# Letters

- Author: [Augustine of Hippo](https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/authors/augustine-of-hippo/)
- Latin title: *Epistulae*
- Date: ca. 386–430 (approximate)
- Source: Alois Goldbacher, ed., S. Aureli Augustini Hipponiensis episcopi epistulae, CSEL 34.1, 34.2, 44, 57 (Prague: Tempsky; Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag, 1895–1911) (Latin text: Alois Goldbacher (CSEL 34, 44, 57, 1895–1911), digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0)

- Translation: Claude, from the original text, unless a passage says otherwise; each passage below gives the translator
- Editions and translations: Johannes Divjak, ed., Epistulae ex duobus codicibus nuper in lucem prolatae, CSEL 88 (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981)
- Work page: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/
- Passages: 2204

## Letter 1.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:1–2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Hermogenianus that he imitated rather than refuted the Academics, whose concealment of truth suited their age but now discourages the search for truth.

### Latin text

Academicos ego ne inter iocandum quidem umquam lacessere auderem — quando enim me tantorum uirorum non moueret auctoritas? —, nisi eos putarem longe in aliam, quam uulgo creditum est, fuisse sententiam, quare potius eos imitatus sum, quantum ualui, quam expugnaui, quod omnino non ualeo. uidetur enim mihi satis congruisse temporibus, ut, si quid sincerum de fonte Platonico flueret, inter umbrosa et spinosa dumeta potius in possessionem paucissimorum hominum duceretur, quam per aperta manans inruentibus passim pecoribus nullo modo posset liquidum purumque seruari. quid enim conuenientius pecori est quam putari animam corpus esse? contra huius modi homines opinor ego illam utiliter excogitatam occultandi ueri artem atque rationem. hoc autem saeculo cum iam nullos uideamus philosophos nisi forte amiculo corporis, quos quidem haud censuerim dignos tam uenerabili nomine, reducendi mihi uidentur homines, si quos Academicorum per uerborum ingenium a rerum comprehensione terruit sententia, in spem reperiendae ueritatis, ne id, quod eradicandis altissimis erroribus pro tempore accommodatum fuit, iam incipiat inserendae scientiae impedimento esse.

### English translation (Claude)

I would never dare to provoke the Academics, not even in jest (for when would the authority of such great men fail to move me?), unless I thought that they held a view far different from the one commonly believed. That is why I have imitated them, as far as I could, rather than refuted them, which I am quite unable to do. For it seems to me to have suited those times well that, if anything pure flowed from the Platonic spring, it should be led through shady and thorny thickets into the possession of very few, rather than run through open ground where, with cattle breaking in on every side, it could in no way be kept clear and pure. For what is more fitting for cattle than to think that the soul is a body? Against people of this kind I think that art and method of hiding the truth was usefully devised. But in this age, when we see no philosophers any more except, perhaps, by the cloak on their bodies (and I would hardly judge such men worthy of so venerable a name), it seems to me that people should be brought back to the hope of finding the truth, if the doctrine of the Academics, through the cleverness of its words, has frightened any of them away from grasping things; otherwise what was suited to the times for rooting out the deepest errors may now begin to be an obstacle to planting knowledge.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Hermogenianus (the address is not printed in the digital text). The 'little books' are Augustine's Against the Academics.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 1.1 (CSEL 34.1:1–2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-1).

## Letter 1.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In the past scepticism spurred people to search harder; now it gives the lazy an excuse to stop thinking.

### Latin text

Tantum enim tunc uariarum sectarum studia flagrabant, ut nihil metuendum esset nisi falsi approbatio. pulsus autem quisque illis argumentis ab eo, quod se firmum et inconcussum tenere crediderat, tanto constantius atque cautius aliud quaerebat, quanto et in moribus erat maior industria et in natura rerum atque animorum altissima et implicitissima latere ueritas sentiebatur. tanta porro nunc fuga laboris et incuria bonarum artium, ut, simul atque sonuerit acutissimis philosophis esse uisum nihil posse comprehendi, dimittant mentes et in aeternum obducant. non enim audent uiuaciores se illis credere, ut sibi appareat, quod tanto studio ingenio otio, tam denique multa multiplicique doctrina, postremo uita etiam longissima Carneades inuenire non potuit. si uero etiam aliquantum obnitentes aduersum pigritiam legerint eosdem libros, quibus quasi ostenditur naturae humanae denegata perceptio, tanto torpore indormiscent, ut nec caelesti tuba euigilent.

### English translation (Claude)

For in those days the zeal of the various schools burned so hot that nothing was to be feared except the approval of a falsehood. And each person, driven by those arguments from what he had believed he held firm and unshaken, searched for something else all the more steadily and cautiously, the greater the diligence in moral life was, and the more it was felt that truth lay hidden, very deep and very intricate, in the nature of things and of souls. But now there is such flight from labour and such neglect of the liberal arts that, as soon as word goes round that the sharpest philosophers held that nothing can be grasped, people dismiss their minds and cover them over for ever. For they do not dare to believe themselves more lively than those men, so as to expect to see clearly what Carneades could not find with so much zeal, talent and leisure, with such great and manifold learning, and finally with a very long life as well. And if, struggling a little against laziness, they do read the very books in which perception is, as it were, shown to be denied to human nature, they fall asleep in such torpor that not even the trumpet of heaven would wake them.

### Translation notes

- Carneades: head of the New Academy in the second century BC.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 1.2 (CSEL 34.1:2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-2).

## Letter 1.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:2–3
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Hermogenianus to judge the end of the third book of Against the Academics and says his real gain was freedom from despair of finding the truth.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem cum gratissimum habeam fidele iudicium tuum de libellis meis tantumque in te momenti ponam, ut nec error in tua prudentia nec in amicitia simulatio cadere possit, illud magis peto diligentius consideres mihique rescribas, utrum adprobes, quod in extremo tertii libri suspiciosius fortasse quam certius, utilius tamen, ut arbitror, quam incredibilius putaui credendum. equidem, quoquo modo se habent illae litterae, non tam me delectat, ut scribis, quod Academicos uicerim — scribis enim hoc amantius forte quam uerius —, quam quod mihi abruperim odiosissimum retinaculum, quo a philosophiae ubere desperatione ueri, quod est animi pabulum, refrenabar.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, since I value your faithful judgment of my little books very highly, and set such weight on you that neither error can befall your prudence nor pretence your friendship, I ask you rather to consider more carefully, and write back to me, whether you approve of what I thought should be believed at the end of the third book, more with suspicion, perhaps, than with certainty, yet, as I think, more usefully than incredibly. For my part, however those writings stand, I am not so much delighted, as you write, that I have defeated the Academics (for you write this perhaps more lovingly than truly), as that I have broken off from myself the most hateful tether by which, through despair of the truth, which is the food of the mind, I was held back from the breast of philosophy.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 1.3 (CSEL 34.1:2–3; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-1-3).

## Letter 2.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-2-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:3–4
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Zenobius that, though the mind should love only what is unchanging, he still longs for his absent friend, and asks him to finish their discussion by letter.

### Latin text

Bene inter nos conuenit, ut opinor, omnia, quae corporeus sensus adtingit, ne puncto quidem temporis eodem modo manere posse, sed labi, effluere et praesens nihil obtinere, id est, ut latine loquar, non esse. horum itaque amorem perniciosissimum poenarumque plenissimum uera et diuina philosophia monet frenare atque sopire, ut se toto animus, etiam dum hoc corpus agit, in ea, quae semper eiusdem modi sunt neque peregrino pulchro placent, feratur atque aestuet. quae cum ita sint et cum te uerum ac simplicem, qualis sine ulla sollicitudine amari potes, in semet ipsa mens uideat, fatemur tamen congressum istum atque conspectum tuum, cum a nobis corpore discedis locisque seiungeris, quaerere nos eoque, dum licet cupere fratribus. quod profecto uitium, si te bene noui, amas in nobis et, cum omnia bona optes carissimis et familiarissimis tuis, ab hoc eos sanare metuis. si autem tam potenti animo es, ut et agnoscere hunc laqueum et eo captos inridere ualeas, ne tu magnus atque alius. ego quidem quamdiu desidero absentem, desiderari me uolo. inuigilo tamen, quantum queo, et nitor, ut nihil amem, quod abesse a me inuito potest. quod dum officio, commoneo te interim, qualiscumque sis, inchoatam tecum disputationem perficiendam, si curae nobismet ipsis sumus. nam eam cum Alypio perfici nequaquam sinerem, etiam si uellet. non uult autem; non enim est humanitatis eius non mecum operam dare, ut in quam multis possemus litteris te nobiscum teneamus nescio qua necessitate fugientem.

### English translation (Claude)

We are well agreed, I think, that all things which bodily sense touches cannot remain in the same state even for a moment of time, but slip away, flow off, and hold nothing present; that is, to speak plain Latin, they do not exist. Therefore true and divine philosophy warns us to curb and lull to sleep the love of these things, a love most pernicious and full of penalties, so that the mind with its whole self, even while it animates this body, may be borne toward and burn for those things that are always of the same kind and do not please by a borrowed beauty. Though this is so, and though the mind sees you within itself as true and simple, such as you can be loved without any anxiety, we confess nevertheless that, when you depart from us in body and are separated from us by place, we seek that company and sight of you, and long for it while we may, as brothers do. Surely, if I know you well, you love this fault in us, and though you wish every good for your dearest and most intimate friends, you are afraid to cure them of it. But if you are of so strong a mind that you can both recognize this snare and laugh at those caught in it, then you are great indeed, and different from us. For my part, as long as I long for one who is absent, I want to be longed for. Yet I keep watch as far as I can, and strive to love nothing that can be absent from me against my will. While I am about this, I remind you meanwhile, whatever you may be, that the discussion begun with you must be completed, if we have any care for ourselves. For I would never allow it to be completed with Alypius, even if he wished. But he does not wish it; for it is not like his kindness to fail to join me in trying to hold you with us by as many letters as we can, since you flee from us by some necessity or other.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Zenobius. The clause 'dum licet cupere fratribus' is difficult in the printed text; it is translated by sense ('long for it while we may, as brothers do').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 2.1 (CSEL 34.1:3–4; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-2-1).

## Letter 3.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:4–6
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, writing to Nebridius, recounts how he debated with himself in bed whether Nebridius was right to call him happy.

### Latin text

Utrum nescio quo, ut ita dicam, blandiloquio tuo factum putem, an uere ita se res habeat, incertum apud me est. nam repente accidit nec satis deliberatum est, quatenus debeat committi fidei. expectas, quid istuc sit. quid censes? prope persuasisti mihi non quidem beatum esse me, nam id solius sapientis praedium est, sed certe quasi beatum, ut dicimus hominem quasi hominem in comparatione hominis illius, quem Plato nouerat, aut quasi rotunda et quasi quadra ea, quae uidemus, cum longe ab eis absint, quae paucorum animus uidet. legi enim litteras tuas ad lucernam iam cenatus; proxime erat cubitio, sed non ita etiam dormitio; quippe diu mecum in lecto situs cogitaui atque has loquelas habui Augustinus ipse cum Augustino: Nonne uerum est, quod Nebridio placet, beatos nos esse? non utique; nam stultos adhuc esse nec ipse audet negare. quid, si etiam stultis beata uita contingit? durum! quasi uero parua uel alia ulla miseria sit quam ipsa stultitia. unde ergo illi uisum est? an lectis illis libellis etiam sapientem me ausus est credere? non usque adeo temeraria est laetitia gestiens praesertim hominis, cuius quanti ponderis consideratio sit, bene nouimus. illud igitur est: scripsit, quod nobis putauit dulcissimum fore, quia et illi dulce factum est, quicquid posuimus in illis litteris, et scripsit gaudens nec curauit, quid committendum gaudenti calamo esset. quid? si Soliloquia legisset? laetaretur multo exundantius nec tamen reperiret plus aliquid, quod me appellaret, quam beatum. cito ergo summum nomen effudit in me nec sibi aliquid reseruauit, quod de me laetior adseueret. uide, laetitia quid faciat.

### English translation (Claude)

Whether I should think this the result of some, so to speak, flattering speech of yours, or whether things really are so, I am uncertain. For it happened suddenly, and I have not yet considered well enough how far it should be trusted. You are waiting to hear what it is. What do you think? You have almost persuaded me, not indeed that I am happy, for that is the estate of the wise man alone, but certainly that I am, as it were, happy; as we call a man 'as it were a man' in comparison with that man whom Plato knew, or call the things we see 'as it were round' and 'as it were square', though they are far from those which the minds of a few see. For I read your letter by lamplight, after supper; bedtime was near, but not yet sleep. Indeed, lying long in bed, I thought it over and held this conversation, Augustine himself with Augustine: 'Is it not true, as Nebridius holds, that we are happy?' Certainly not; for even he does not dare to deny that we are still fools. 'What if the happy life comes even to fools?' Hardly! As though folly itself were a small misery, or there were any misery but it. 'Then how did it seem so to him? Having read those little books, did he dare to think me even wise?' The joy of an exultant man is not as rash as that, especially of a man whose weight of judgment we know well. So this is it: he wrote what he thought would be very sweet to us, because whatever we put in those books became sweet to him too; and he wrote rejoicing, and did not consider what should be entrusted to a joyful pen. What if he had read the Soliloquies? He would rejoice far more overflowingly, and yet he would find nothing greater to call me than happy. So he quickly poured out on me the highest name, and kept nothing in reserve to affirm of me when he is happier still. See what joy does!

### Extrabiblical texts

- Plato (Plato (works)): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Nebridius. 'That man whom Plato knew': the Platonic Form of man.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 3.1 (CSEL 34.1:4–6; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-1).

## Letter 3.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:6–7
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks whether happiness lies in knowing natural philosophy and reflects on infinite divisibility and the contrast between intelligible and sensible number.

### Latin text

Sed ubi est ista beata uita? ubi? ubinam? o si ipsa esset repellere atomos Epicuri! o si ipsa esset scire nihil deorsum esse praeter mundum! o si ipsa esset nosse extrema sphaerae tardius rotari quam medium! et alia similia, quae similiter nouimus. nunc uero quomodo uel qualiscumque beatus sum, qui nescio. cur tantus mundus sit, cum rationes figurarum, per quas est, nihil prohibeant esse, quanto quis uoluerit, ampliorem? aut non mihi diceretur, immo non cogeremur confiteri corpora in infinitum secari, ut a certa uelut basi in quantitatem certam certus corpusculorum numerus surgeret? quare cum corpus nullum esse minimum sinitur, quo pacto esse sinamus amplissimum, quo amplius esse non posset, nisi forte illud, quod aliquando Alypio dixi occultissime, habet magnam uim, ut, quoniam numerus ille intellegibilis infinite crescit, non tamen infinite minuitur — nam non eum licet ultra monadem resoluere —, contra sensibilis — nam quid est aliud sensibilis numerus nisi corporeorum uel corporum quantitas? — minui quidem infinite, sed infinite crescere nequeat. et ideo fortasse merito philosophi in rebus intellegibilibus diuitias ponunt, in sensibilibus egestatem. quid enim aerumnosius quam minus atque minus semper posse fieri? quid ditius quam crescere, quantum uelis, ire, quo uelis, redire, cum uelis, quousque uelis, et hoc multum amare, quod minui non potest? quisquis namque intellegit istos numeros, nihil sic amat ut monadem; nec mirum, cum per eam fiat, ut ceteri amentur. sed tamen cur tantus est mundus? poterat enim esse uel maior uel breuior. nescio; tale est enim. et cur hoc loco potius quam illo? nec in ea re debet esse quaestio: ubi quicquid esset, quaestio esset. unum illud multum mouebat, quod infinite corpora secarentur, cui fortasse responsum est de ui contraria intellegibilis numeri.

### English translation (Claude)

But where is that happy life? Where? Where on earth? Oh, if only it consisted in rejecting the atoms of Epicurus! Oh, if only it consisted in knowing that there is nothing below except the world! Oh, if only it consisted in knowing that the outer parts of a sphere turn more slowly than the middle! and other such things, which we know in the same way. But as it is, how or in what sense am I happy, when I do not know why the world is as large as it is, though the principles of the figures by which it exists in no way prevent it from being larger, as much larger as anyone pleases? Or would it not be said to me, or rather would we not be compelled to admit, that bodies can be divided to infinity, so that from a fixed base, as it were, a fixed number of particles rises to a fixed quantity? Therefore, since no body is allowed to be the smallest, on what terms may we allow there to be a largest, than which there could be none larger? Unless perhaps what I once said to Alypius in great secrecy has great force: that, since intelligible number increases infinitely but does not decrease infinitely (for it may not be resolved beyond the unit), sensible number on the contrary (for what else is sensible number but the quantity of bodily things or bodies?) can decrease infinitely but cannot increase infinitely. And perhaps that is why philosophers rightly place riches in intelligible things and poverty in sensible ones. For what is more wretched than always being able to become less and less? What is richer than to grow as much as you wish, to go where you wish, to return when you wish, as far as you wish, and to love greatly that which cannot be diminished? For whoever understands those numbers loves nothing as much as the unit; and no wonder, since it is through it that the others are loved. But still, why is the world as large as it is? It could have been either larger or smaller. I do not know; it is so. And why in this place rather than that? There should be no question about that either: wherever anything was, there would be a question. The one thing that troubled me greatly was that bodies can be divided infinitely, and perhaps this has been answered by the contrary power of intelligible number.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 3.2 (CSEL 34.1:6–7; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-2).

## Letter 3.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:7–8
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that mirrors can shrink images but never enlarge them, and leaves the puzzle to sleep on.

### Latin text

Sed expecta; uideamus, quid sit hoc nescio quid, quod suggeritur menti. certe sensibilis mundus nescio cuius intellegibilis imago esse dicitur. mirum est autem, quod in imaginibus uidemus, quas specula referunt; nam quamuis ingentia specula sint, non reddunt maiores imagines, quam sunt corpora etiam breuissima obiecta. in paruis autem specillis sicut in pupillis oculorum etsi magna facies sese opponat, breuissima imago pro modo speculi formatur. ergo et imagines corporum minui licet, si specula minuantur; augeri, si augeantur, non licet. hic profecto aliquid latet. sed nunc dormiendum est. neque enim Nebridio beatus quaerendo uideor, sed fortasse aliquid inueniendo. id autem aliquid quid est? an illa ratiocinatio, cui tamquam unicae meae blandiri soleo et ea me nimis oblectare?

### English translation (Claude)

But wait; let us see what this something is that is being suggested to my mind. Certainly the sensible world is said to be the image of some intelligible one. Now what we see in the images that mirrors give back is strange; for however huge mirrors are, they do not give back images larger than the bodies set before them, even very small ones. But in small mirrors, as in the pupils of the eyes, even if a large face is set before them, a very small image is formed in proportion to the mirror. So the images of bodies may be diminished if the mirrors are diminished, but may not be enlarged if the mirrors are enlarged. Surely something lies hidden here. But now I must sleep. For it is not by seeking that I seem happy to Nebridius, but perhaps by finding something. And what is that something? Is it that line of reasoning which I am accustomed to flatter as though it were my only one, and in which I take too much delight?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 3.3 (CSEL 34.1:7–8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-3).

## Letter 3.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:8
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In a short dialogue with himself Augustine argues that the soul is better than the body, that truth lies in the understanding, and that happiness is not in sensible pleasure.

### Latin text

Unde constamus? ex animo et corpore. quid horum melius? uidelicet animus. quid laudatur in corpore? nihil aliud uideo quam pulchritudinem. quid est corporis pulchritudo? congruentia partium cum quadam coloris suauitate. haec forma ubi uera melior, an ubi falsa? quis dubitet, ubi uera est, esse meliorem? ubi ergo uera est? in animo scilicet. animus igitur magis amandus quam corpus. sed in qua parte animi est ista ueritas? in mente atque intellegentia. quid huic aduersatur? sensus. resistendum ergo sensibus totis animi uiribus liquet. quid si sensibilia nimium delectant? fiat, ut non delectent. unde fit? consuetudine his carendi appetendique meliora. quid si moritur animus? ergo moritur ueritas aut non est intellegentia ueritas aut intellegentia non est in animo aut potest mori aliquid, in quo aliquid inmortale est. nihil autem horum fieri posse Soliloquia nostra iam continent satisque persuasum est; sed nescio qua consuetudine malorum territamur atque titubamus. postremo etiam si moritur animus, quod nullo modo fieri posse uideo, non esse tamen beatam uitam in laetitia sensibilium hoc otio satis exploratum est. his rebus fortasse atque talibus Nebridio meo si non beatus, at certe quasi beatus uideor. uidear et mihi; quid inde perdo aut cur parcam bonae opinioni? haec mihi dixi; deinde oraui, ut solebam, atque dormiui.

### English translation (Claude)

What are we made of? Of soul and body. Which of these is better? The soul, obviously. What is praised in the body? I see nothing other than beauty. What is the beauty of a body? A harmony of the parts with a certain pleasantness of colour. Is this form better where it is true or where it is false? Who would doubt that it is better where it is true? Where, then, is it true? In the soul, of course. So the soul is to be loved more than the body. But in what part of the soul is that truth? In the mind and understanding. What opposes this? The senses. So it is clear that the senses must be resisted with all the strength of the soul. What if sensible things delight too much? Let it come about that they do not delight. How does that come about? By the habit of doing without them and of desiring better things. What if the soul dies? Then truth dies, or understanding is not truth, or understanding is not in the soul, or something in which there is something immortal can die. But our Soliloquies already contain the proof that none of these can happen, and we are sufficiently persuaded of it; yet through some habit of evils we are frightened and waver. Finally, even if the soul dies, which I see can in no way happen, it has been sufficiently established in this leisure that the happy life does not lie in the joy of sensible things. Perhaps through these and similar things I seem to my Nebridius, if not happy, at least as it were happy. Let me seem so to myself as well; what do I lose by it, or why should I be sparing of a good opinion? These things I said to myself; then I prayed, as I used to, and slept.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 3.4 (CSEL 34.1:8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-4).

## Letter 3.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:8–9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by asking Nebridius about the correct passive infinitive of cupio and similar verbs and begs for a longer letter.

### Latin text

Haec placuit scribere tibi. delectat enim me, quod mihi gratias agis, si nihil te, quod in buccam uenerit, celem, et gaudeo, quia sic tibi placeo. apud quem igitur libentius ineptiam, quam cui displicere non possum? at si in potestate fortunae est, ut hominem amet homo, uide quam beatus sim, qui de fortuitis tam multum gaudeo et talia bona, fateor, desidero mihi ubertim adcrescere. fortunae autem bona uerissimi sapientes, quos solos beatos fas est uocari, nec timeri uoluerunt nec cupi — an cupiri? tu uideris. et belle accidit. nam uolo me declinationis huius gnarum facias. cum enim adiungo uerba similia, incertior fio. nam ita est cupio ut fugio, ut sapio, ut iacio, ut capio; sed utrum fugiri an fugi, utrum sapiri an sapi sit modus infinitus, ignoro. possem adtendere iaci et capi, ni uererer, ne me caperet et pro ludibrio iaceret, quo uellet, qui iactum et captum aliud, aliud fugitum, cupitum, sapitum esse conuinceret. quae item tria utrum paenultima longa et inflexa, an graui breuique pronuntianda sint, similiter nescio. prouocauerim te ad epistulam longiorem; peto, ut paulo diutius te legam. nam non queo tantum dicere, quantum uolupe est legere te.

### English translation (Claude)

I was pleased to write this to you. For it delights me that you thank me if I hide from you nothing that comes into my mouth, and I rejoice that I please you in this way. With whom, then, would I rather play the fool than with one whom I cannot displease? But if it is in the power of fortune that one person loves another, see how happy I am, who rejoice so much in things of chance and, I confess, wish such goods to grow abundantly for me. Yet the truly wise, who alone may rightly be called happy, wished the goods of fortune neither to be feared nor desired (cupi), or is it cupiri? You will see to that. And this falls out nicely, for I want you to make me expert in this conjugation. For when I set similar verbs beside it, I become more uncertain. For cupio goes like fugio, sapio, iacio, capio; but whether the infinitive is fugiri or fugi, sapiri or sapi, I do not know. I could look to iaci and capi, were I not afraid that someone would 'catch' me and 'throw' me where he pleased as a laughingstock, by proving that iactum and captum are one thing and fugitum, cupitum and sapitum another. And likewise I do not know whether these three should be pronounced with the next-to-last syllable long and circumflexed, or with a grave and short one. I would challenge you to a longer letter; I ask that I may read you a little longer. For I cannot say how great a pleasure it is to read you.

### Translation notes

- The grammatical question concerns the passive infinitive and supine of third-conjugation -io verbs; the 'catch' and 'throw' are puns on capio and iacio.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 3.5 (CSEL 34.1:8–9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-3-5).

## Letter 4.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-4-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:9–10
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Nebridius that progress in distinguishing the sensible from the intelligible is real but gradual, like growing up.

### Latin text

Mirum admodum est, quam mihi praeter spem euenerit, quod, cum requiro, quibus epistulis tuis mihi respondendum remanserit, unam tantum inueni, quae me adhuc debitorem teneret, qua petis, ut tanto nostro otio, quantum esse arbitraris tecum aut nobiscum cupis, indicemus tibi, quid in sensibilis atque intellegibilis naturae discernentia profecerimus. sed non arbitror occultum tibi esse, si falsis opinionibus tanto quisque inseritur magis, quanto magis in eis familiariusque uolutatur, multo id facilius in rebus ueris animo accidere. ita tamen paulatim ut per aetatem proficimus. quippe cum plurimum inter puerum et iuuenem distet, nemo a pueritia cotidie interrogatus se aliquando iuuenem dicet.

### English translation (Claude)

It is quite wonderful how beyond hope it has turned out for me that, when I looked for which of your letters remained for me to answer, I found only one that still kept me in your debt, the one in which you ask that, with all the leisure you suppose we have, and wish us to have with you or with ourselves, we tell you what progress we have made in distinguishing between sensible and intelligible nature. But I do not think it is hidden from you that, if each person becomes more deeply rooted in false opinions the more he turns them over and grows familiar with them, this happens far more easily to the mind in things that are true. Yet we progress gradually, as we do with age. For though there is a great difference between a boy and a young man, no one who was questioned every day from boyhood would ever say on a given day that he had now become a young man.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Nebridius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 4.1 (CSEL 34.1:9–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-4-1).

## Letter 4.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-4-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:10–11
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he is refreshed by the argument that what the mind understands is more real than what the eyes see, and asks Nebridius to check whether he still owes him letters.

### Latin text

Quod nolo in eam partem accipias, ut nos in his rebus quasi ad quandam mentis iuuentutem firmioris intellegentiae robore peruenisse existimes. pueri enim sumus, sed, ut dici adsolet, forsitan belli; et non male. nam plerumque perturbatos et sensibilium plagarum curis refertos illa tibi notissima ratiuncula in respirationem leuat, mentem atque intellegentiam oculis et hoc uulgari aspectu esse meliorem. quod ita non esset, nisi magis essent illa, quae intellegimus, quam ista, quae cernimus. cui ratiocinationi utrum nihil ualide inimicum sit, peto mecum consideres. hac ego interim recreatus cum deo in auxilium deprecato et in ipsum et in ea, quae uerissime uera sunt, adtolli coepero, tanta non numquam rerum manentium praesumptione compleor, ut mirer interdum illa mihi opus esse ratiocinatione, ut haec esse credam, quae tanta insunt praesentia, quanta sibi quisque ipse fit praesens. recole tu quoque; nam te fateor huius rei esse diligentiorem, ne quid forte nesciens rescriptis adhuc debeam. nam mihi non facit fidem tam multorum onerum, quae aliquando numeraueram, tam repentina depositio, quamuis te accepisse litteras meas non dubitem, quarum rescripta non habeo.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not want you to take this to mean that we have reached in these matters a kind of youth of the mind, with the strength of a firmer understanding. For we are boys, but, as the saying goes, perhaps pretty ones; and not badly so. For most often, when we are disturbed and filled with the cares of wounds received through the senses, that little argument so well known to you lets us breathe again: that mind and understanding are better than the eyes and this common sight. This would not be so unless the things we understand existed more truly than those we see. Please consider with me whether anything is strongly opposed to this reasoning. Refreshed by it meanwhile, when I have called on God for help and have begun to be lifted up both to him and to those things that are most truly true, I am sometimes filled with such a foretaste of abiding things that I am at times surprised that I need that reasoning in order to believe that these things exist, which are as present within us as each person is present to himself. Look back over things yourself as well (for I confess that you are more careful about this), in case I still owe you replies without knowing it. For I cannot believe that so many burdens, which I had once counted up, were laid down so suddenly, although I do not doubt that you received my letters, to which I have no replies.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 4.2 (CSEL 34.1:10–11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-4-2).

## Letter 5.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-5-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:11
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nebridius writes to Augustine regretting that civic business at Thagaste keeps him from the quiet life of devotion to God, and invites him to his country estate.

### Latin text

Itane est, mi Augustine? fortitudinem ac tolerantiam negotiis ciuium praestas necdum tibi redditur illa exoptata cessatio? quaeso, qui te tantum bonum homines interpellant? credo, qui nesciunt, quid ames, quid concupiscas. nullusne tibi est amicorum, qui eis amores referat tuos? nec Romanianus nec Lucinianus? me certe audiant. ego clamabo, ego testabor te deum amare, illi seruire atque inhaerere cupere. uellem ego te in rus meum uocare ibique adquiescere. non enim timebo me seductorem tui dici a ciuibus tuis, quos nimium amas et a quibus nimium amaris.

### English translation (Claude)

Is it so, my Augustine? Do you show fortitude and endurance for the affairs of your fellow citizens, and is that longed-for rest still not given back to you? Tell me, who are these people who make such demands on so good a man? I suppose people who do not know what you love and what you desire. Have you no friend to tell them what you love? Neither Romanianus nor Lucinianus? Let them listen to me at least. I will cry out, I will testify that you love God and long to serve him and cling to him. I would like to call you to my country estate and let you rest there. For I will not be afraid of being called your seducer by your fellow citizens, whom you love too much and who love you too much.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Nebridius to Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 5.1 (CSEL 34.1:11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-5-1).

## Letter 6.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-6-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:11–12
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nebridius praises Augustine's letters and argues that every memory involves an image in the imagination.

### Latin text

Epistulas tuas perplacet ita seruare ut oculos meos. sunt enim magnae non quantitate sed rebus et magnarum rerum magnas continent probationes. illae mihi Christum, illae Platonem, illae Plotinum sonabunt. erunt igitur mihi et ad audiendum propter eloquentiam dulces et ad legendum propter breuitatem faciles et ad intellegendum propter sapientiam salubres. curabis ergo, quod tuae menti sanctum bonumque fuerit uisum, me docere. his autem litteris respondebis, cum de phantasia et memoria subtilius aliquid disputaris. mihi enim ita uidetur, quod, quamuis non omnis phantasia cum memoria sit, omnis tamen memoria sine phantasia esse non possit. sed dices: Quid, cum recordamur nos intellexisse aut cogitasse aliquid? contra haec ego respondeo et dico propterea hoc euenisse, quia, cum intelleximus uel cogitauimus corporeum ac temporale aliquid, genuimus, quod ad phantasiam pertinet; nam aut uerba intellectui cogitationibusque nostris adiunximus, quae uerba sine tempore non sunt et ad sensum uel phantasiam pertinent, aut tale aliquid noster intellectus cogitatioue passa est, quod in animo phantastico memoriam facere potuisset. haec ego inconsiderate ac perturbate, ut soleo, dixi; tu explorabis et falso reiecto ueritatem in litteris conferes.

### English translation (Claude)

I am very glad to keep your letters as I would my own eyes. For they are great, not in length but in content, and they contain great proofs of great things. They will speak to me of Christ, of Plato, of Plotinus. So they will be sweet to hear for their eloquence, easy to read for their brevity, and wholesome to understand for their wisdom. You will take care, then, to teach me whatever has seemed holy and good to your mind. But you will answer this letter when you have discussed something more precisely about imagination and memory. For it seems to me that, although not every act of imagination is accompanied by memory, no memory can be without imagination. But you will say: 'What about when we remember that we have understood or thought something?' Against this I answer and say that this happens because, when we understood or thought something bodily and temporal, we produced something that belongs to imagination; for either we joined words to our understanding and thoughts, and words are not without time and belong to sense or imagination, or our understanding or thought underwent something of such a kind that it could have produced a memory in the imagining soul. I have said these things without reflection and in confusion, as is my habit; you will examine them, reject what is false, and set down the truth in a letter.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Nebridius to Augustine. 'Imagination' renders phantasia throughout this exchange.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 6.1 (CSEL 34.1:11–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-6-1).

## Letter 6.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-6-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:12–13
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nebridius asks whether the imagination has its images from itself, merely prompted by the senses.

### Latin text

Audi aliud: cur, quaeso te, non a se potius quam a sensu phantasiam habere omnes imagines dicimus? potest enim, quem ad modum noster animus intellectualis ad intellegibilia sua uidenda a sensu admonetur potius quam aliquid accipit, ita et phantasticus animus ad imagines suas contemplandas a sensu admoneri potius quam aliquid adsumere. nam forte inde contingit, ut ea, quae sensus non uidet, ille tamen aspicere possit. quod signum est in se et a se habere omnes imagines. de hac re quoque, quid sentias, respondebis.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear something else: why, I ask you, do we not say that the imagination has all its images from itself rather than from sense? For just as our intellectual soul is prompted by sense to see its intelligible objects rather than receiving anything from it, so too the imagining soul may be prompted by sense to contemplate its own images rather than taking anything in. For perhaps that is how it comes about that it can see things which sense does not see. This is a sign that it has all images in itself and from itself. On this too you will reply with what you think.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 6.2 (CSEL 34.1:12–13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-6-2).

## Letter 7.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:13
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Nebridius that memory is not always of things that have passed away and not always bound to images.

### Latin text

Prooemio supersidam et cito incipiam, quod me iam iamque uis dicere, praesertim non cito desiturus. memoria tibi uidetur nulla esse posse sine imaginibus uel imaginariis uisis, quae phantasiarum nomine appellare uoluisti; ego aliud existimo. primum ergo uidendum est non nos semper rerum praetereuntium meminisse, sed plerumque manentium. quare cum sibi memoria praeteriti temporis uindicet tenacitatem, constat eam tamen partim eorum esse, quae nos deserunt, partim eorum, quae deseruntur a nobis. nam cum recordor patrem meum, id utique recordor, quod me deseruit et nunc non est; cum autem Carthaginem, id quod est et quod ipse deserui. in utroque tamen horum generum praeteritum tempus memoria tenet. nam et illum hominem et istam urbem ex eo, quod uidi, non ex eo, quod uideo, memini.

### English translation (Claude)

I will dispense with a preface and quickly begin what you want me to say at once, especially as I will not soon be done. It seems to you that there can be no memory without images or imaginary visions, which you chose to call by the name 'phantasies'; I think otherwise. First, then, we must see that we do not always remember things that pass away, but very often things that remain. So, though memory claims for itself a hold on past time, it is clear that it is partly of things that leave us and partly of things that are left by us. For when I remember my father, I remember something that has left me and now is not; but when I remember Carthage, something that exists and that I myself have left. In both these kinds, however, memory holds past time. For I remember both that man and that city from what I saw, not from what I see.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius, answering letter 6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.1 (CSEL 34.1:13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-1).

## Letter 7.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:13–14
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends Plato's doctrine of recollection and argues that there can be memory of eternal things without images.

### Latin text

Hic tu fortasse quaeris: Quorsum ista? praesertim cum animaduertas utrumlibet horum non posse in memoriam uenire nisi uiso illo imaginario. at mihi satis est sic interim ostendisse posse dici earum etiam rerum, quae nondum interierunt, memoriam. uerum quid me adiuuet, facito intentius accipias. nonnulli calumniantur aduersus Socraticum illud nobilissimum inuentum, quo adseritur non nobis ea, quae discimus, ueluti noua inseri, sed in memoriam recordatione reuocari, dicentes memoriam praeteritarum rerum esse, haec autem, quae intellegendo discimus, Platone ipso auctore manere semper nec posse interire ac per hoc non esse praeterita. qui non adtendunt illam uisionem esse praeteritam, quia haec aliquando mente uidimus; a quibus quia defluximus et aliter alia uidere coepimus, ea nos reminiscendo reuisere, id est per memoriam. quam ob rem si, ut alia omittam, ipsa aeternitas semper manet nec aliqua imaginaria figmenta conquirit, quibus in mentem quasi uehiculis ueniat, nec tamen uenire posset, nisi eius meminissemus, potest esse quarundam rerum sine ulla imaginatione memoria.

### English translation (Claude)

Here you may ask: 'What is the point of this?' especially since you notice that either of these can come into memory only through that imaginary vision. But for the time being it is enough for me to have shown in this way that one can speak of memory even of things that have not yet perished. Now pay closer attention to how this helps me. Some people cavil against that most famous discovery of Socrates, which asserts that the things we learn are not implanted in us as new but are called back into memory by recollection. They say that memory is of past things, but that the things we learn by understanding, on the authority of Plato himself, abide always and cannot perish, and therefore are not past. They do not notice that the vision is past, because we once saw these things with the mind; and since we have flowed away from them and begun to see other things in another way, we see them again by remembering, that is, through memory. Therefore, to leave other things aside, if eternity itself always abides and seeks no imaginary fictions on which to come into the mind as on vehicles, and yet it could not come unless we remembered it, there can be memory of some things without any imagination.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Plato (Plato (works)): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Socratic doctrine of learning as recollection (Plato, Meno and Phaedo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.2 (CSEL 34.1:13–14; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-2).

## Letter 7.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:14–15
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the soul cannot have had images of bodies before using the senses, since then dreamers and madmen would see more truly than the waking and sane.

### Latin text

Iam uero quod tibi uidetur anima etiam non usa sensibus corporis corporalia posse imaginari, falsum esse conuincitur isto modo. si anima, priusquam corpore utatur ad corpora sentienda, eadem corpora imaginari potest et melius, quod nemo sanus ambigit, affecta erat, antequam his fallacibus sensibus implicaretur, melius afficiuntur animae dormientium quam uigilantium, melius phreneticorum quam tali peste carentium; his enim afficiuntur imaginibus, quibus ante istos sensus uanissimos nuntios afficiebantur, et aut uerior erit sol, quem uident illi, quam ille, quem sani atque uigilantes, aut erunt ueris falsa meliora. quae si absurda sunt, sicuti sunt, nihil est aliud illa imaginatio, mi Nebridi, quam plaga inflicta per sensus, quibus non, ut tu scribis, commemoratio quaedam fit, ut talia formentur in anima, sed ipsa huius falsitatis inlatio siue, ut expressius dicatur, inpressio. quod sane te mouet, qui fiat, ut eas facies formasque cogitemus, quas numquam uidimus, acute mouet. itaque faciam, quod ultra solitum modum hanc epistulam porrigat, sed non apud te, cui nulla est pagina gratior, quam quae me loquaciorem adportat tibi.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, as to your view that the soul, even without using the senses of the body, can imagine bodily things, that this is false is proved in this way. If the soul, before it uses the body to perceive bodies, can imagine those same bodies, and if (as no sane person doubts) it was in a better state before it was entangled in these deceptive senses, then the souls of sleepers are in a better state than those of the waking, and the souls of the frenzied better than those of people free of such a plague; for they are affected by the images by which they were affected before these senses, those most empty messengers. And either the sun that they see will be truer than the one seen by the sane and the waking, or false things will be better than true. If these things are absurd, as they are, that imagination, my Nebridius, is nothing other than a wound inflicted through the senses; through them there does not occur, as you write, a kind of reminding, so that such things are formed in the soul, but the very bringing in, or, to put it more exactly, the impressing, of this falsity. As for what troubles you, how it comes about that we think of faces and forms that we have never seen, it is a sharp objection. So I will do something that stretches this letter beyond its usual measure, but not in your eyes, for no page is more welcome to you than one that brings me to you more talkative.

### Translation notes

- The conditional sentence is loosely constructed in the printed text and is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.3 (CSEL 34.1:14–15; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-3).

## Letter 7.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:15–16
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine divides images into three kinds: those of things perceived, things supposed or invented, and things reasoned such as numbers and figures.

### Latin text

Omnes has imagines, quas phantasias cum multis uocas, in tria genera commodissime ac uerissime distribui uideo, quorum est unum sensis rebus inpressum, alterum putatis, tertium ratis. primi generis exempla sunt, cum mihi tuam faciem uel Carthaginem uel familiarem quondam nostrum Uerecundum et si quid aliud manentium uel mortuarum rerum, quas tamen uidi atque sensi, in se animus format. alteri generi subiciantur illa, quae putamus ita se habuisse uel ita se habere, uel cum disserendi gratia quaedam ipsi fingimus nequaquam impedientia ueritatem uel qualia figuramus, cum legitur historia et cum fabulosa uel audimus uel componimus uel suspicamur. ego enim mihi, ut libet atque ut occurrit animo, Aeneae faciem fingo, ego Medeae cum suis anguibus alitibus iunctis iugo, ego Chremetis et alicuius Parmenonis. in hoc genere sunt etiam illa, quae siue sapientes aliquid ueri talibus inuoluentes figuris siue stulti, uariarum superstitionum conditores, pro uero adtulerunt, ut est tartareus Phlegethon et quinque antra gentis tenebrarum et stilus septentrionalis continens caelum et alia poetarum atque haereticorum mille portenta. dicimus etiam inter disputandum: puta esse tres super inuicem mundos, qualis hic unus est, et: puta quadrata figura terram contineri. et similia. haec enim omnia, ut se cogitationis tempestas habuerit, fingimus et putamus. nam de rebus, quod ad tertium genus adtinet imaginum, numeris maxime atque dimensionibus agitur, quod partim est in rerum natura, cum totius mundi figura inuenitur et hanc inuentionem in animo cogitantis imago sequitur, partim in disciplinis tamquam in figuris geometricis et rhythmicis musicis et infinita uarietate numerorum. quae quamuis uera, sic ut ego autumo, comprehendantur, gignunt tamen falsas imaginationes, quibus ipsa ratio uix resistit, tametsi nec ipsam disciplinam disserendi carere hoc malo facile est, cum in diuisionibus et conclusionibus quosdam quasi calculos imaginamur.

### English translation (Claude)

All these images, which you, with many others, call 'phantasies', I see can be most conveniently and most truly divided into three kinds: one impressed by things perceived, another by things supposed, the third by things reasoned. Examples of the first kind are when my mind forms within itself your face, or Carthage, or our former friend Verecundus, or anything else, whether still existing or dead, which I have nevertheless seen and perceived. Under the second kind fall the things we suppose to have been so or to be so; or the things which we ourselves invent for the sake of argument and which in no way hinder the truth; or the sort of things we picture when history is read, and when we hear or compose or conjecture fables. For I picture to myself, as I please and as it occurs to my mind, the face of Aeneas, or of Medea with her winged serpents joined to the yoke, or of Chremes and some Parmeno. In this kind are also the things which either wise men, wrapping some truth in such figures, or fools, the founders of various superstitions, have put forward as true, such as the Phlegethon of Tartarus, and the five caves of the race of darkness, and the northern pole that holds up the sky, and a thousand other monsters of the poets and heretics. We also say in the course of argument, 'Suppose there are three worlds one above another, such as this one is', and 'Suppose the earth is contained in a square figure', and the like. For all these we invent and suppose as the drift of our thinking has it. As for the third kind of images, it is chiefly a matter of numbers and dimensions. This is partly in the nature of things, as when the shape of the whole world is discovered and an image follows this discovery in the mind of the one thinking; partly in the sciences, as in geometrical figures, musical rhythms, and the infinite variety of numbers. Although these, as I hold, are grasped as true, they nevertheless give rise to false imaginings which reason itself can scarcely resist; indeed, it is not easy even for the discipline of argument itself to be free of this evil, since in divisions and conclusions we imagine a kind of counters, as it were.

### Translation notes

- Chremes and Parmeno are characters of Roman comedy (Terence). 'The five caves of the race of darkness' refers to Manichaean cosmology; the 'northern pole that holds up the sky' (stilus septentrionalis) is probably also a Manichaean image.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.4 (CSEL 34.1:15–16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-4).

## Letter 7.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:16–17
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the soul did not have such false images before it was joined to the body and the senses.

### Latin text

In hac tota imaginum silua credo tibi non uideri primum illud genus ad animam, priusquam inhaereat sensibus, pertinere; neque hinc diutius disserendum. de duobus reliquis iure adhuc quaeri posset, nisi manifestum esset animam minus esse obnoxiam falsitatibus nondum passam sensibilium sensuumque uanitatem. at istas imagines quis dubitauerit istis sensibilibus multo esse falsiores? nam illa quae putamus et credimus siue fingimus, et ex omni parte omnino falsa sunt et certe longe, ut cernis, ueriora [esse], quae uidemus atque sentimus. iam in illo tertio genere quodlibet spatium corporale animo figurauero, quamquam id rationibus disciplinarum minime fallentibus cogitatio peperisse uideatur, ipsis rursum rationibus arguentibus falsum esse conuinco. quo fit, ut nullo pacto animam credam nondum corpore sentientem, nondum per sensus uanissimos mortali et fugaci substantia uerberatam in tanta falsitatis ignominia iacuisse.

### English translation (Claude)

In this whole forest of images I believe it does not seem to you that the first kind belongs to the soul before it clings to the senses; nor need we argue about this any longer. About the other two a question could still rightly be raised, were it not obvious that the soul is less subject to falsehoods when it has not yet undergone the emptiness of sensible things and of the senses. But who would doubt that those images are far more false than these sensible things? For the things we suppose and believe or invent are entirely false in every respect, and certainly, as you see, the things we see and perceive are far truer. Now in that third kind, whatever bodily space I picture in my mind, although thought seems to have produced it by the principles of the sciences, which are least deceptive, I prove it false by those very principles, which refute it in turn. So it is that I can in no way believe that the soul, before it perceived through the body, before it was beaten by mortal and fleeting substance through the emptiest senses, lay in such a disgrace of falsehood.

### Translation notes

- The editor deletes 'esse' after 'ueriora'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.5 (CSEL 34.1:16–17; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-5).

## Letter 7.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:17
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that we imagine unseen things through the soul's power to add and take away from images received through the senses.

### Latin text

Unde igitur euenit, ut, quae non uidemus, cogitemus? quid putas, nisi esse uim quandam minuendi et augendi animae insitam, quam, quocumque uenerit, necesse est adferat secum? quae uis in numeris praecipue animaduerti potest. hac fit, ut uerbi gratia corui quasi ob oculos imago constituta, quae uidelicet aspectibus nota est, demendo et addendo quaedam ad quamlibet omnino numquam uisam imaginem perducatur. hoc euenit, ut per consuetudinem uoluentibus sese in talibus animis figurae huiusce modi uelut sua sponte cogitationibus inruant. licet igitur animae imaginanti ex his, quae illi sensus inuexit, demendo, ut dictum est, et addendo ea gignere, quae nullo sensu adtingit tota; partes uero eorum in aliis atque aliis rebus adtigerat. ita nos pueri apud mediterraneos nati atque nutriti uel in paruo calice aqua uisa iam imaginari maria poteramus, cum sapor fragorum et cornorum, antequam in Italia gustaremus, nullo modo ueniret in mentem. hinc est, quod a prima aetate caeci, cum de luce coloribusque interrogantur, quid respondeant, non inueniunt; non enim coloratas ullas patiuntur imagines, qui senserint nullas.

### English translation (Claude)

Where, then, does it come from that we think of things we do not see? What do you suppose, except that there is a certain power of diminishing and increasing implanted in the soul, which it must bring with it wherever it goes? This power can be observed especially in numbers. By it, for example, the image of a crow, set as it were before the eyes, an image that is of course known by sight, can by taking away and adding certain things be brought to any image at all that has never been seen. Hence it happens that, through habit, figures of this kind rush as if of their own accord into the thoughts of minds that turn themselves about in such things. So the imagining soul may, from the things the senses brought into it, by taking away and adding, as has been said, produce things which it does not touch whole by any sense, though it had touched their parts in one thing and another. Thus we, as boys born and brought up inland, could already imagine seas after seeing water even in a small cup, while the taste of strawberries and cornel cherries in no way came into our minds before we tasted them in Italy. That is why those who have been blind from birth, when asked about light and colours, can find nothing to answer; for those who have perceived no coloured images do not experience any.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.6 (CSEL 34.1:17; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-6).

## Letter 7.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-7
- Source: CSEL 34.1:17–18
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that many motions of the soul occur without images and urges Nebridius to break off all friendship with the images of the senses.

### Latin text

Nec mirere, quo pacto ea, quae in rerum natura figurantur, effingi possint non primo anima, quae omnibus inest, secum ista uoluente, cum ea numquam extrinsecus senserit. non enim etiam nos cum indignando aut laetando ceterisque huiusce modi animi motibus multos in nostro corpore uultus coloresque formamus, prius nostra cogitatio, quod facere possimus, tales imagines concipit. consequuntur ista miris illis modis et committendis cogitationi tuae, cum in anima sine ulla corporalium figura falsitatum numeri actitantur occulti. ex quo intellegas uelim, cum tam multos animi motus esse sentias expertes omnium, de quibus nunc quaeris, imaginum, quolibet alio motu animam sortiri corpus quam sensibilium cogitatione formarum, quas eam, priusquam corpore sensibusque utatur, nullo modo arbitror pati posse. quam ob rem pro nostra familiaritate et pro ipsius diuini iuris fide sedulo monuerim, carissime mihi ac iucundissime, nullam cum istis infernis umbris copules amicitiam neue illam, quae copulata est, cunctere diuellere. nullo modo enim resistitur corporis sensibus, quae nobis sacratissima disciplina est, si per eos inflictis plagis uulneribusque blandimur.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should you wonder how the things that are shaped in the nature of things can be formed without the soul, which is present in all, first turning them over within itself, since it has never perceived them from outside. For not even when we form many expressions and colours in our body in indignation or joy and other such motions of the mind does our thought first conceive images of what we can do. These follow in those wonderful ways which I leave to your own thought, when hidden numbers are set at work in the soul without any image of bodily falsities. From this I would like you to understand, since you perceive that so many motions of the mind are free of all the images you are now asking about, that the soul obtains a body by some other motion than by thinking of sensible forms, which I think it can in no way experience before it uses the body and the senses. Therefore, by our friendship and by the faithfulness of divine law itself, I would earnestly warn you, my dearest and most delightful friend, to form no friendship with those shades of the underworld, and not to delay in tearing apart the friendship that has been formed. For there is no resisting the senses of the body, which is our most sacred discipline, if we caress the blows and wounds inflicted through them.

### Translation notes

- 'The soul obtains a body' (animam sortiri corpus) is uncertain in sense; it may mean that the soul affects the body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 7.7 (CSEL 34.1:17–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-7-7).

## Letter 8.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-8-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:18–20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nebridius asks Augustine how heavenly powers send dreams to sleepers, since he cannot send dreams to a friend and the body itself seems to cause dreams.

### Latin text

Festinanti mihi ad rem peruenire nullum prooemium, nullum placet exordium. qui fit, mi Augustine, uel qui modus est ille, quo utuntur superiores potestates, quas caelestes intellegi uolo, cum eis placet nobis dormientibus aliqua somnia demonstrare? qui, inquam, modus est? id est, quomodo id faciunt, qua arte, quibus manganis quibusque instrumentis aut medicamentis? animumne nostrum per cogitationes suas inpellunt, ut nos etiam ea cogitando imaginemur? an ipsa in suo corpore uel in sua phantasia facta nobis offerunt et ostendunt? sed si in suo corpore ea faciunt, sequitur, ut et nos alios oculos corporeos intrinsecus habeamus, cum dormimus, quibus ea uideamus, quae illi in suo corpore formauerunt. sin uero ad istas res non corpore adiuuantur suo, sed in phantastico suo ista disponunt atque ita phantastica nostra contingunt et fit uisum, quod est somnium, cur, quaeso te, non ego phantastico meo tuum phantasticum ea somnia generare compello, quae mihi primo in eo ipse formaui? certe et mihi est phantasia et, quod uolo, potis est fingere, cum omnino nullum tibi facio somnium, sed ipsum corpus nostrum uideo in nobis somnia generare. nam cum se male habuerit, per affectum, quo animae copulatur, cogit nos id ipsum miris modis per phantasian assimulare. saepe dormientes cum sitimus, bibere somniamus et esurientes quasi comedentes uidemur et multa talia, quae quasi commercio quodam a corpore in animam phantastice transferuntur. haec pro sui obscuritate pro nostraque inperitia ne mireris si minus eleganter minusque subtiliter explicata sunt; tu id facere, quantum poteris, laborabis.

### English translation (Claude)

As I hurry to come to the point, I want no preface, no exordium. How does it come about, my Augustine, or what is the means used by the higher powers (by which I mean the heavenly ones), when they choose to show us dreams while we sleep? What, I say, is the means? That is, how do they do it, by what art, by what devices, by what instruments or drugs? Do they drive our mind by their own thoughts, so that we too imagine those things by thinking? Or do they offer and show us things made in their own body or in their own imagination? But if they make them in their own body, it follows that we too have other bodily eyes within us when we sleep, with which to see what they have formed in their body. But if they are not helped by their body in these things, but arrange them in their imagination and so touch our imaginations, and a vision results, which is a dream, why, I ask you, can I not compel your imagination by mine to produce the dreams which I have first formed in mine? Certainly I too have imagination, and it is able to picture what I wish, yet I produce no dream at all for you; but I see that our body itself produces dreams in us. For when it is unwell, through the bond by which it is joined to the soul, it compels us in wonderful ways to imitate that very condition through imagination. Often when we are thirsty in sleep we dream that we are drinking, and when hungry we seem to be eating, and there are many such things, which pass from the body to the soul in the imagination by a kind of exchange. Do not be surprised if, because of their obscurity and our inexperience, these things have been set out without much elegance or precision; you will work to do so as far as you can.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Nebridius to Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 8.1 (CSEL 34.1:18–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/1-1/#p-8-1).

## Letter 9.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine consoles Nebridius in his loneliness, telling him to turn to his own mind and to God, where friends are present without bodily images.

### Latin text

Quamquam mei animi cognitor sis, fortasse tamen ignoras, quantum uelim praesentia tua frui. uerum hoc tam magnum beneficium deus quandoque praestabit. legi recentissimam epistulam tuam, in qua de solitudine questus es et quadam desertione a familiaribus tuis, cum quibus uita dulcissima est. sed quid aliud hic tibi dicam, nisi quod te non dubito facere? confer te ad animum tuum et illum in deum leua, quantum potes. ibi enim certius habes et nos non per corporeas imagines, quibus nunc in nostra recordatione uti necesse est, sed per illam cogitationem, qua intellegis non loco esse nos simul.

### English translation (Claude)

Although you know my mind, perhaps you do not know how much I long to enjoy your presence. But God will grant this great benefit some day. I have read your latest letter, in which you complained of solitude and of being in a sense deserted by your intimate friends, with whom life is sweetest. But what else should I say to you here, except what I do not doubt you are doing? Withdraw into your mind and lift it up to God as far as you can. For there you possess us too more surely, not through bodily images, which we must now use in our remembering, but through that thought by which you understand that we are together, not by place.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius, answering letter 8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 9.1 (CSEL 34.1:20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-1).

## Letter 9.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the question how higher powers or demons put thoughts and dreams into us needs a book, but offers some hints.

### Latin text

Epistulas tuas cum considerarem, quibus non dubium tibi quaerenti magna respondi, uehementer me illa terruit, qua percontaris, quomodo fiat, ut nobis a superioribus potestatibus uel a daemonibus et cogitationes quaedam inserantur et somnia. magna enim res est, cui tu quoque pro tua prudentia perspicis non epistula, sed aut praesenti conlocutione aut aliquo libello respondendum esse. temptabo tamen callens ingenium tuum quaedam quaestionis huius lumina praeseminare, ut aut cetera tecum ipse contexas aut posse ad rei tantae probabilem inuestigationem perueniri minime desperes.

### English translation (Claude)

As I was considering your letters, in which I have certainly answered great questions you asked, I was greatly alarmed by the one in which you ask how it comes about that certain thoughts and dreams are put into us by the higher powers or by demons. For it is a great matter, and you too, with your prudence, see that it must be answered not by a letter but either by conversation in person or by some book. Yet, knowing your gifts, I will try to sow beforehand some lights on this question, so that you may either weave the rest together yourself or at least not despair that a probable investigation of so great a matter can be reached.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 9.2 (CSEL 34.1:20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-2).

## Letter 9.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:20–21
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine suggests that motions of the mind leave traces in the body which beings of air or ether can perceive and stir, producing thoughts and dreams.

### Latin text

Arbitror enim omnem motum animi aliquid facere in corpore; id autem usque ad nostros exire sensus tam hebetes tamque tardos, cum sunt maiores animi motus, uelut cum irascimur aut tristes aut gaudentes sumus. ex quo licet conicere, cum etiam cogitamus aliquid neque id nobis in nostro corpore apparet, apparere tamen posse aeriis aetheriisue animantibus, quorum est sensus acerrimus et in cuius comparatione noster ne sensus quidem putandus est. igitur ea, quae, ut ita dicam, uestigia sui motus animus figit in corpore, possunt et manere et quendam quasi habitum facere; quae latenter cum agitata fuerint et contrectata, secundum agitantis et contrectantis uoluntatem ingerunt nobis cogitationes et somnia atque id fit mira facilitate. si enim nostrorum corporum terrenorum et tardissimorum excitationes agendis organis musicis seu in funiambulo ceterisque huiusce modi spectaculis innumerabilibus ad quaedam incredibilia peruenisse manifestum est, nequaquam est absurdum eos, qui aerio uel aetherio corpore aliquid in corporibus agunt, quae naturali ordine penetrant, longe maiore uti facilitate ad mouendum, quicquid uolunt, non sentientibus nobis et tamen inde aliquid perpetientibus. neque enim etiam, quomodo fellis abundantia nos ad iram crebriorem cogat, sentimus et tamen cogit, cum haec ipsa, quam dixi, abundantia facta sit irascentibus nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

For I think that every motion of the mind produces something in the body, and that this reaches our senses, dull and slow as they are, when the motions of the mind are greater, as when we are angry or sad or joyful. From this we may infer that, even when we think something and it does not appear to us in our body, it can nevertheless appear to living beings of air or ether, whose perception is extremely sharp, so that in comparison ours should not even be thought perception. So the traces, so to speak, of its motion which the mind fixes in the body can both remain and form a kind of habit; and when these are secretly stirred and handled, they bring thoughts and dreams to us according to the will of the one stirring and handling them; and this happens with wonderful ease. For if it is clear that the movements of our earthly and very slow bodies have achieved certain incredible feats in playing musical instruments, or in the tightrope walker and countless other spectacles of this kind, it is in no way absurd that those who act with an airy or ethereal body on bodies, which by the order of nature they penetrate, should have far greater ease in moving whatever they wish, without our perceiving it and yet with our undergoing something as a result. For neither do we perceive how an abundance of bile drives us to more frequent anger, and yet it does drive us, though this very abundance of which I spoke was produced by our being angry.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 9.3 (CSEL 34.1:20–21; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-3).

## Letter 9.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:21–22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine illustrates with anger and bile how what the mind produces in the body can in turn move the mind.

### Latin text

Sed hoc autem si non uis simile nobis praetereunter accipere, uersa id cogitatione, quantum potes. nam si animo existat assidue aliqua difficultas agendi atque implendi, quod cupit, assidue irascitur. ira est autem, quantum mea fert opinio, turbulentus appetitus auferendi ea, quae facilitatem actionis impediunt. itaque plerumque non hominibus tantum, sed calamo irascimur in scribendo eumque conlidimus atque frangimus et aleatores tesseris et pictores penicillo et cuique instrumento quilibet, ex quo difficultatem se pati arbitratur. hac autem assiduitate irascendi fel crescere etiam medici adfirmant. cremento autem fellis rursus et facile ac prope nullis causis existentibus irascimur. ita quod suo motu animus fecit in corpore, ad eum rursus commouendum ualebit.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you do not want to accept this comparison of ours in passing, turn it over in your thought as much as you can. For if the mind constantly meets some difficulty in doing and accomplishing what it desires, it is constantly angry. Now anger, as far as my opinion goes, is a turbulent desire to remove the things that hinder ease of action. So very often in writing we are angry not only with people but with the pen, and crush and break it; and gamblers are angry with their dice, painters with their brush, and anyone with any instrument from which he thinks he is suffering difficulty. Physicians also affirm that bile increases through this constant anger. And with the increase of bile we again become angry easily and almost without cause. So what the mind has done in the body by its motion will have the power to move it again in turn.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 9.4 (CSEL 34.1:21–22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-4).

## Letter 9.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refers Nebridius back to his letter on images and memory to explain how we picture bodies we have never seen.

### Latin text

Possunt latissime ista tractari et multis rerum testimoniis ad certiorem plenioremque perduci notitiam. sed huic epistulae adiunge illam, quam tibi nuper de imaginibus et de memoria misi, et eam diligentius pertracta; nam minus plene a te intellecta rescripto tuo mihi apparuit. huic ergo, quam nunc legis, cum adiunxeris de illa, quod ibi dictum est de naturali quadam facultate animi minuentis et augentis cogitatione quodlibet, fortasse te iam non mouebit, unde fiat, ut etiam formae corporum, quas numquam uidimus, uel cogitando apud nos uel somniando figurentur.

### English translation (Claude)

These things could be treated at great length and brought to more certain and fuller knowledge by many testimonies from the facts. But add to this letter the one I recently sent you about images and memory, and study it more carefully; for it seemed to me from your reply that you had understood it less than fully. So when you have added to this letter, which you are now reading, what was said there about a certain natural faculty of the mind that diminishes and increases anything in thought, perhaps it will no longer trouble you how it comes about that forms of bodies which we have never seen are pictured within us, whether in thinking or in dreaming.

### Translation notes

- The earlier letter is letter 7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 9.5 (CSEL 34.1:22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-9-5).

## Letter 10.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:22–23
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Nebridius's complaint that they do not live together, weighing the difficulties of travel, Nebridius's mother, and his own duties and poor health.

### Latin text

Numquam aeque quicquam tuarum inquisitionum me in cogitando tenuit aestuantem atque illud, quod recentissimis tuis litteris legi, ubi nos arguis, quod consulere neglegamus, ut una nobis uiuere liceat. magnum crimen et, nisi falsum esset, periculosissimum. sed cum perprobabilis ratio demonstrare uideatur hic nos potius quam Carthagini uel etiam in rure ex sententia posse degere, quid tecum agam, mi Nebridi, prorsus incertus sum. mittaturne ad te accommodissimum tibi uehiculum? nam basterna innoxie te uehi posse noster Lucinianus auctor est. at matrem cogito, ut quae absentiam sani non ferebat, inbecilli multo minus esse laturam. ueniamne ipse ad uos? at hic sunt, qui neque uenire mecum queant et quos deserere nefas putem. tu enim potes et apud tuam mentem suauiter habitare; hi uero ut idem possint, satagitur. eamne crebro et redeam et nunc tecum, nunc cum ipsis sim? at hoc neque simul neque ex sententia uiuere est. non enim breuis est uia, sed tanta omnino, cuius peragendae negotium saepe suscipere non sit ad optatum otium peruenisse. huc accedit infirmitas corporis, qua ego quoque, ut nosti, non ualeo, quod uolo, nisi omnino desinam quicquam plus uelle, quam non ualeo.

### English translation (Claude)

None of your questions has ever held me so agitated in thought as what I read in your latest letter, where you accuse us of neglecting to arrange that we may live together. A great charge, and, if it were not false, a most dangerous one. But since a very probable reason seems to show that we can live as we wish here rather than at Carthage or even in the country, I am quite uncertain what to do about you, my Nebridius. Should a carriage best suited to you be sent to you? For our Lucinianus assures me that you can travel without harm in a litter. But I think of your mother: as she could not bear your absence when you were well, she will much less bear it when you are ill. Should I come to you myself? But there are people here who cannot come with me and whom I would think it wrong to desert. For you can dwell pleasantly even within your own mind; but for them to be able to do the same, effort is still being made. Should I go and return often, and be now with you, now with them? But that is to live neither together nor as we wish. For the road is not short, but so long that to undertake the business of travelling it often would not be to reach the leisure we desire. Add to this the weakness of my body, by which I too, as you know, cannot do what I want unless I cease altogether to want more than I can.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 10.1 (CSEL 34.1:22–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-1).

## Letter 10.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:23–24
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that a life of constant travel and business is incompatible with the leisure needed to prepare for death and to reach a fearless joy.

### Latin text

Profectiones ergo, quas quietas et faciles habere nequeas, per totam cogitare uitam non est hominis de illa una ultima, quae mors uocatur, cogitantis, de qua uel sola intellegis uere esse cogitandum. dedit quidem deus paucis quibusdam, quos ecclesiarum gubernatores esse uoluit, ut et illam non solum expectarent fortiter, sed alacriter etiam desiderarent et harum obeundarum labores sine ullo angore susciperent; sed neque his, qui ad huius modi administrationes temporalis honoris amore raptantur, neque rursum his, qui cum sunt priuati, negotiosam uitam appetunt, hoc tantum bonum concedi arbitror, ut inter strepitus inquietosque conuentus atque discursus cum morte familiaritatem, quam quaerimus, faciant; deificari enim utrisque in otio licebat. aut si hoc falsum est, ego sum omnium ne dicam stultissimus, certe ignauissimus, cui nisi proueniat quaedam secura cessatio, sincerum illud bonum gustare atque amare non possum. magna secessione a tumultu rerum labentium, mihi crede, opus est, ut non duritia, non audacia, non cupiditate inanis gloriae, non superstitiosa credulitate fiat in homine nihil timere. hinc enim fit illud etiam solidum gaudium nullis omnino laetitiis ulla ex particula conferendum.

### English translation (Claude)

To think throughout one's whole life, then, about journeys which cannot be made quietly and easily is not the part of a man who is thinking about that one last journey which is called death, the only one, as you understand, that truly deserves thought. God has indeed granted to a certain few, whom he has willed to be governors of churches, not only to await that journey bravely but even to desire it eagerly, and to take on the labours of these other journeys without any anguish. But I do not think so great a good is granted either to those who are swept into such offices by love of temporal honour, or again to those who, though private persons, seek a busy life, that amid noise and restless gatherings and running about they should achieve the familiarity with death that we seek; for both were free to become godlike in leisure. Or if this is false, I am, I will not say the most foolish, but certainly the most sluggish of all men, for unless some secure rest comes to me I cannot taste and love that pure good. Believe me, a great withdrawal from the tumult of passing things is needed so that a man may come to fear nothing, not through hardness, not through boldness, not through desire for empty glory, not through superstitious credulity. For from this comes that solid joy which cannot be compared in any part with any pleasures at all.

### Translation notes

- 'To become godlike' renders deificari ('to be deified').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 10.2 (CSEL 34.1:23–24; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-2).

## Letter 10.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:24–25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appeals to Nebridius's own experience of inner peace in God and asks him to help plan how they can live together.

### Latin text

Quod si in natura humana talis uita non cadit, cur aliquando euenit ista securitas? cur tanto euenit crebrius, quanto quisque in mentis penetralibus adorat deum? cur in actu etiam humano plerumque ista tranquillitas manet, si ex illo adyto ad agendum quisque procedat? cur interdum et cum loquimur, mortem non formidamus, cum autem non loquimur, etiam cupimus? tibi dico, non enim hoc cuilibet dicerem, tibi, inquam, dico, cuius itinera in superna bene noui, tune, cum expertus saepe sis, quam dulce uiuat, cum amori corporeo animus moritur, negabis tandem totam hominis uitam posse intrepidam fieri, ut rite sapiens nominetur? aut hanc affectionem, quam ratio nititur tibi accidisse umquam, nisi cum in intimis tuis ageris, asserere audebis? quae cum ita sint, restare unum uides, ut tu quoque in commune consulas, quo uiuamus simul. quid enim cum matre agendum sit, quam certe frater Victor non deserit, tu multo melius calles quam ego. alia scribere, ne te ab ista cogitatione auerterem, nolui.

### English translation (Claude)

But if such a life does not fall within human nature, why does that security sometimes come? Why does it come more often the more one worships God in the inner sanctuary of the mind? Why does that tranquillity usually remain even in human activity, if one goes out to act from that inner shrine? Why are we sometimes unafraid of death even while we are speaking, and, when we are not speaking, even desire it? I say to you (for I would not say this to just anyone), I say to you, whose journeys to the heights I know well: will you, who have often experienced how sweetly the mind lives when it dies to bodily love, deny after all that the whole of a person's life can become fearless, so that he may rightly be called wise? Or will you dare to assert that this state of mind, on which reason relies, has ever come to you except when you were occupied in your inmost self? Since this is so, you see that one thing remains: that you too take counsel for our common good, how we may live together. For what is to be done about your mother, whom your brother Victor certainly does not desert, you know much better than I. I did not want to write of other things, so as not to turn you away from this thought.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 10.3 (CSEL 34.1:24–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-10-3).

## Letter 11.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, relieved by Nebridius's letter about living together, asks him to stop sending new questions until the old ones are answered.

### Latin text

Cum me uehementer agitaret quaestio a te dudum cum quadam etiam familiari obiurgatione proposita, quonam pacto una uiuere possemus, et de hoc solo statuissem et rescribere tibi et rescripta flagitare neque ad aliud aliquid, quod ad nostra studia pertinet, stilum auertere, donec inter nos istuc ipsum terminaretur, cito me securum fecit recentis epistulae tuae breuissima et uerissima ratio, propterea scilicet hinc non esse cogitandum, quia uel nos, cum potuerimus, ad te, uel tu, cum potueris, ad nos necessario uenturus sis. hinc ergo, ut dixi, securus effectus consideraui omnes epistulas tuas, ut uiderem, quarum responsionum debitor sim. in quibus tam multas quaestiones repperi, ut, etiam si facile dissolui possent, ipso aceruo cuiusuis ingenium otiumque superarent. tam uero difficiles sunt, ut, etiam si una earum mihi esset inposita, non dubitarem me onustissimum confiteri. hoc autem prooemium ad id ualet, ut tantisper desinas noua quaerere, donec toto aere alieno liberemur, et de solo iudicio tuo mihi rescribas. quamquam scio, quam sit aduersum me, qui tuarum diuinarum cogitationum uel tantisper particeps esse differo.

### English translation (Claude)

I was greatly troubled by the question you put to me some time ago, with a friendly rebuke as well, how we could live together; and I had decided to write back to you about this alone and to press you for a reply, and not to turn my pen to anything else belonging to our studies until this very matter was settled between us. But the very brief and very true argument of your latest letter quickly set me at ease: namely, that there is no need to think about it from here, because either we, when we can, will necessarily come to you, or you, when you can, to us. Set at ease on this point, then, as I said, I went over all your letters to see what answers I owe. In them I found so many questions that, even if they could be easily solved, by their very mass they would overwhelm anyone's talent and leisure. And they are so difficult that, even if only one of them were laid on me, I would not hesitate to confess myself heavily burdened. This preface serves to ask you to stop asking new questions for a while, until we are free of the whole debt, and to write back to me only your judgment. Yet I know how much against my own interest this is, since I put off sharing in your divine thoughts even for a while.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 11.1 (CSEL 34.1:25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-1).

## Letter 11.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:25–26
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine takes up Nebridius's question why, if the works of the Trinity are inseparable, the incarnation is attributed to the Son alone.

### Latin text

Accipe igitur, quid mihi uideatur de susceptione hominis mystica, quam propter salutem nostram factam esse religio, qua inbuti sumus, credendum cognoscendumque commendat. quam quaestionem non facillimam omnium elegi, cui potissimum responderem, sed ea mihi dignior ceteris uisa est, cui operam cogitationis inpenderem. illa namque, quae de hoc mundo quaeruntur, nec satis ad beatam uitam obtinendam mihi uidentur pertinere et, si aliquid adferunt uoluptatis, cum inuestigantur, metuendum est tamen, ne occupent tempus rebus inpendendum melioribus. quam ob rem quod ad hoc pertinet susceptum in praesentia, prius miror te esse commotum, cur non pater et filius dicatur hominem suscepisse, sed etiam spiritus sanctus. nam ista trinitas catholica fide ita inseparabilis commendatur et creditur, ita etiam a paucis sanctis beatisque intellegitur, ut, quicquid ab ea fit, simul fieri sit existimandum et a patre et a filio et ab spiritu sancto nec quicquam patrem facere, quod non et filius et spiritus sanctus faciat, nec quicquam filium, quod non et pater et spiritus sanctus, nec quicquam spiritum sanctum, quod non et pater et filius. ex quo uidetur esse consequens, ut hominem trinitas tota susceperit; nam si filius suscepit, pater autem et spiritus sanctus non susceperunt, aliquid praeter inuicem faciunt. cur ergo in mysteriis et sacris nostris hominis susceptio filio tributa celebratur? haec est plenissima quaestio ita difficilis et de re tam magna, ut nec sententia hic satis expedita nec eius probatio satis secura esse possit. audeo tamen, si quidem ad te scribo, significare potius, quid meus animus habeat, quam explicare, ut cetera pro ingenio tuo et familiaritate nostra, qua fit, ut me optime noueris, per te ipse coniectes.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear, then, what I think about the mystical assumption of a man, which the religion in which we have been instructed commends to us to be believed and known as done for our salvation. I chose this question to answer first, not as the easiest of all, but because it seemed to me more worthy than the others of the labour of thought. For the questions asked about this world do not seem to me to bear sufficiently on obtaining the happy life, and if they bring some pleasure when investigated, it is to be feared that they take up time that should be spent on better things. As to the matter now in hand, then, first I am surprised that you were troubled why it is not said that the Father along with the Son assumed a man, and were not troubled about the Holy Spirit as well. For this Trinity is commended and believed by the Catholic faith as so inseparable, and is also understood so by a few holy and blessed people, that whatever is done by it must be thought to be done at the same time by the Father and by the Son and by the Holy Spirit; and the Father does nothing that the Son and the Holy Spirit do not also do, nor the Son anything that the Father and the Holy Spirit do not, nor the Holy Spirit anything that the Father and the Son do not. From this it seems to follow that the whole Trinity assumed the man; for if the Son assumed him, but the Father and the Holy Spirit did not, they do something apart from one another. Why, then, in our mysteries and sacred rites is the assumption of a man celebrated as belonging to the Son? This is a very full question, so difficult and about so great a matter that neither can the answer here be clear enough nor its proof secure enough. Yet I dare, since I am writing to you, to indicate rather than unfold what my mind holds, so that you may yourself conjecture the rest, given your talent and our friendship, through which you know me very well.

### Translation notes

- 'The assumption of a man' (susceptio hominis) is Augustine's term for the incarnation. The clause about the Father and the Holy Spirit is compressed in the Latin and is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 11.2 (CSEL 34.1:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-2).

## Letter 11.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:26–27
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from the threefold structure of every being (existence, form, persistence) that the persons of the Trinity act inseparably.

### Latin text

Nulla natura est, Nebridi, et omnino nulla substantia, quae non in se habeat haec tria et prae se gerat: primo ut sit deinde ut hoc uel illud sit, tertio ut in eo ipso, quod est, maneat, quantum potest. primum illud causam ipsam naturae ostentat, ex qua sunt omnia; alterum speciem, per quam fabricantur et quodam modo....... formanturque omnia; tertium manentiam quandam, ut ita dicam, in qua sunt omnia. quod si fieri potest, ut aliquid sit et non hoc uel illud sit et tam diu sit atque id sit, quam diu in genere suo manet, aut hoc quidem aut illud sit, sed non sit neque in suo genere maneat, quantum potest, aut in suo genere quidem pro ipsius sui generis uiribus maneat, sed tamen nec sit neque hoc uel illud sit, fieri etiam potest, ut in illa trinitate aliqua persona praeter alias aliquid faciat. at si cernis necesse esse ut, quicquid sit, continuo et hoc uel illud sit et in suo genere maneat, quantum potest, nihil tria illa praeter inuicem faciunt. uideo adhuc partem me egisse huius quaestionis, qua fit difficilis solutio. sed breuiter tibi aperire uolui, si tamen egi, quod uolui, quam subtiliter et quanta ueritate in Catholica intellegatur huiusce inseparabilitas trinitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

There is no nature, Nebridius, and no substance at all, that does not have in itself and display these three things: first, that it is; second, that it is this or that; third, that it remains, as far as it can, in what it is. The first shows the very cause of nature, from which all things are; the second, the form through which all things are made and in a certain way formed; the third, a kind of abiding, so to speak, in which all things are. Now if it can happen that something is, and is not this or that, and does not remain in its kind; or that it is this or that, but is not and does not remain in its kind as far as it can; or that it remains in its kind according to the powers of that kind, but nevertheless neither is nor is this or that, then it can also happen that in that Trinity some person does something apart from the others. But if you see that whatever is must at once both be this or that and remain in its kind as far as it can, then those three do nothing apart from one another. I see that so far I have dealt with the part of this question that makes its solution difficult. But I wanted to show you briefly, if indeed I have done what I wanted, how subtly and with what truth the inseparability of this Trinity is understood in the Catholic Church.

### Translation notes

- The first of the three conditions is awkwardly phrased in the printed text and is translated by sense. A row of dots after 'quodam modo' in the digital text is passed over; the sense is complete.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 11.3 (CSEL 34.1:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-3).

## Letter 11.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:27–29
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the incarnation is attributed to the Son because it gave us a rule and example of life, form being proper to the Son, while the Father is known through the Son and the delight of abiding in that knowledge is the gift of the Spirit.

### Latin text

Nunc accipe, quo modo possit non mouere animum illud, quod mouet. species, quae proprie filio tribuitur, ea pertinet etiam ad disciplinam et ad artem quandam, si bene hoc uocabulo in his rebus utimur, et ad intellegentiam, qua ipse animus rerum cogitatione formatur. itaque quoniam per illam susceptionem hominis id actum est, ut quaedam nobis disciplina uiuendi et exemplum praecepti sub quarundam sententiarum maiestate ac perspicuitate insinuaretur, non sine ratione hoc totum filio tribuitur. in multis enim rebus, quas cogitationi et prudentiae committo tuae, quamuis multa insint, aliquid tamen eminet et ideo sibi proprietatem quandam non absurde uindicat. uelut in illis tribus generibus quaestionum, etiam si quaeratur, an sit, ibi est et quid sit, esse enim non potest profecto, nisi aliquid sit; ibi etiam, probandum inprobandumne sit, quicquid enim est, nonnulla aestimatione dignum est; ita cum quaeritur, quid sit, necesse est, ut et sit et aliqua aestimatione pendatur; hoc modo etiam cum quaeritur, quale sit, et aliquid est utique. ita cum sibi inseparabiliter iuncta sunt omnia, nomen tamen quaestio non ex omnibus accipit, sed ut sese habuerit quaerentis intentio. ergo disciplina hominibus erat necessaria, qua inbuerentur et qua ad modum formarentur. num tamen id ipsum, quod per hanc disciplinam fit in hominibus, aut non esse possumus dicere aut non appetendum? sed scire prius intendimus, et per quod coniciamus aliquid et in quo maneamus. demonstranda igitur prius erat quaedam norma et regula disciplinae. quod factum est per illam suscepti hominis dispensationem, quae proprie filio tribuenda est, ut esset consequens et ipsius patris, id est unius principii, ex quo sunt omnia, cognitio per filium et quaedam interior et ineffabilis suauitas atque dulcedo in ista cognitione permanendi contemnendique omnia mortalia, quod donum et munus proprie spiritui sancto tribuitur. ergo cum agantur omnia summa communione et inseparabilitate, tamen distincte demonstranda erant propter inbecillitatem nostram, qui ab unitate in uarietatem lapsi sumus. nemo enim quemquam erigit ad id, in quo ipse est, nisi aliquantum ad id, in quo est ille, descendat. habes epistulam, non quae tuam curam de hac re finierit, sed quae cogitationes tuas certo fortasse aliquo fundamento inchoauerit, ut cetera ingenio, quod mihi notissimum est, persequaris et pietate, cui maxime standum est, consequaris.

### English translation (Claude)

Now hear how what troubles your mind need not trouble it. Form, which is properly attributed to the Son, pertains also to discipline and to a kind of art, if we use this word rightly in these matters, and to the understanding by which the mind itself is formed in thinking of things. So, since the aim of that assumption of a man was that a certain discipline of living and an example of what is commanded should be instilled in us under the majesty and clarity of certain teachings, it is not without reason that all this is attributed to the Son. For in many things, which I leave to your thought and prudence, although many things are present, something nevertheless stands out and therefore not absurdly claims a certain property for itself. So in those three kinds of questions: even if it is asked whether a thing is, there is involved also what it is, for it certainly cannot be unless it is something; and there is involved also whether it is to be approved or disapproved, for whatever is deserves some valuation. So when it is asked what a thing is, it must both be and be weighed by some valuation; in the same way also when it is asked of what sort it is, it certainly is something as well. So, though all are joined inseparably, the question takes its name not from all of them, but from the intention of the questioner. Discipline, then, was necessary for human beings, so that they might be instructed by it and formed according to a measure. Yet can we say that what is brought about in people through this discipline either does not exist or is not to be desired? But we aim first to know, both that through which we may infer something and that in which we may abide. So first a certain norm and rule of discipline had to be shown. This was done through that dispensation of the assumed man, which is to be attributed properly to the Son; so that there would follow both the knowledge of the Father himself, that is, of the one principle from which all things are, through the Son, and a certain inner and ineffable sweetness and delight in remaining in that knowledge and despising all mortal things, a gift and grace that is properly attributed to the Holy Spirit. Therefore, though all things are done in the highest communion and inseparability, they had nevertheless to be shown distinctly because of our weakness, since we have fallen from unity into variety. For no one raises anyone up to where he himself is unless he comes down somewhat to where the other is. Here you have a letter which has not ended your concern about this matter, but has perhaps begun your thoughts on some sure foundation, so that you may pursue the rest with your talent, which I know very well, and attain it by piety, on which one must above all stand.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 11.4 (CSEL 34.1:27–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-11-4).

## Letter 12.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-12-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:29–30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Nebridius which questions have been answered and recalls briefly why the incarnation is attributed to the Son.

### Latin text

Plures epistulas te scribis misisse, quam accepimus; sed neque tibi possum non credere neque mihi tu. tametsi enim rescribendo par esse non ualeo, tamen non minore a me diligentia seruantur litterae tuae, quam frequentantur abs te. prolixiores autem nostras non te amplius quam binas accepisse conuenit inter nos; non enim misimus tertias. sane recognitis exemplaribus animaduerti quinque fere tuis rogationibus esse responsum, nisi quod una ibi quaestio quasi transeunter perstricta, quamquam non temere ingenio tuo commissa sit, non tamen fortasse satisfecit auaritiae tuae. quam refrenes aliquantum opus est et nonnulla compendia libenter feras, ita plane ut, si quicquam fraudo intellegentiam, dum sum parcus in uerbis, nihil parcas mihi; sed tu iure, quo mihi ualentius esset forte aliquid, si quicquam posset esse iucundius, totum, quod debetur, efflagites: hanc igitur epistulam numerabis inter minores epistulas meas, quam tibi t non sibi nihil mihi de aceruo minuere. non enim et tu mittis minores, quae non eundem aceruum augeant. quare illud, quod de filio dei quaeris, cur ipse potius dicatur hominem suscepisse quam pater, cum simul uterque sit, dinosces facillime, si sermocinationum nostrarum, quibus, ut potuimus — nam ineffabile quiddam est —.......... qui sit dei filius, quo coniuncti simus, recorderis. quod ut hic breuiter adtingam, disciplina ipsa et forma dei, per quam facta sunt omnia, quae facta sunt, filius nuncupatur. quicquid autem per susceptum illum hominem gestum est, ad eruditionem informationemque nostram gestum est.

### English translation (Claude)

You write that you have sent more letters than we have received; but I cannot disbelieve you, nor can you disbelieve me. For although I cannot equal you in writing back, your letters are kept by me with no less care than they are sent often by you. As for our longer letters, we agree that you have received no more than two; for we did not send a third. Indeed, having gone over the copies, I noticed that about five of your questions have been answered, except that one question there was touched on in passing, as it were, and, though not rashly left to your talent, perhaps did not satisfy your avarice. You need to rein it in somewhat and gladly accept some abridgements, on the understanding that, if I cheat your understanding at all while I am sparing of words, you are not to spare me at all; but you may by right demand all that is owed … So you will count this letter among my shorter letters … For you too send no shorter letters that do not add to the same pile. Therefore, as to what you ask about the Son of God, why he rather than the Father is said to have assumed a man, though both are together, you will discern it very easily if you remember our conversations in which, as far as we could (for it is something ineffable), … who the Son of God is, to whom we are joined. To touch on it briefly here: the very discipline and form of God, through which all things that were made were made, is called the Son. And whatever was done through that assumed man was done for our instruction and formation.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius; the letter survives only incompletely (NPNF omits it). Two passages are corrupt or defective in the printed text and are marked with '…': the clause 'quod mihi ualentius … efflagites' and the words 'quam tibi t non sibi nihil mihi de aceruo minuere'; and after 'ineffabile quiddam est' a verb (such as 'we discussed') is missing. 'Through which all things that were made were made' echoes John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 12.1 (CSEL 34.1:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-12-1).

## Letter 13.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Nebridius that he has had no leisure for their old questions, but sends what he worked out during the night.

### Latin text

Usitata tibi scribere non libet, noua non licet. alterum enim uideo tibi non convenire, alterum mihi non uacare. nam ex quo abii abs te, nulla mihi opportunitas, nullum otium datum est ea, quae inter nos quaerere solemus, agitandi atque versandi. sunt quidem hiemales nimis longae noctes nec a me totae dormiuntur; sed sese obiciunt magis cogitanda, cum otium est, quae diffirmando sunt otio necessaria. quid ergo faciam? mutusne apud te, an tacitus sim? neutrum uis, neutrum uolo. quare age atque accipe, quod de me excudere potuit ultimum noctis, quam diu exequebatur, quo haec epistula scripta est.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not care to write you ordinary things, and I am not free to write new ones. For I see that the one does not suit you, and that for the other I have no leisure. For since I left you, no opportunity, no leisure has been given me to discuss and turn over the questions we used to investigate together. The winter nights are indeed very long, and I do not sleep through them all; but when I have leisure, other things present themselves to be thought about, things needed to make that leisure secure. What, then, shall I do? Shall I be dumb toward you, or silent? You want neither, and I want neither. So come and receive what the last part of the night was able to hammer out of me, for as long as it lasted while this letter was being written.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius. 'Diffirmando' in the printed text is obscure and is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 13.1 (CSEL 34.1:30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-1).

## Letter 13.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:30–31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the question of a subtle body or 'vehicle' of the soul cannot be settled, since it is neither intelligible nor perceptible to us.

### Latin text

Necesse est te meminisse, quod crebro inter nos sermone iactatum est nosque iactauit anhelantes atque aestuantes, de animae scilicet ueluti perpetuo quodam corpore uel quasi corpore, quod a nonnullis etiam dici uehiculum recordaris. quam rem certe, si quidem loco mouetur, non esse intellegibilem clarum est. quicquid autem intellegibile non est, intellegi non potest. at quod intellectum fugit, si saltem sensum non fugit, aestimare inde aliquid uerisimiliter non usquequaque denegatur. quod uero neque intellegi neque sentiri potest, temerariam nimis et nugatoriam gignit opinionem. et hoc, de quo agimus, tale est, si tamen est. cur ergo, quaeso te, non nobis ad hanc quaestiunculam indicimus ferias et nos totos inprecato deo in summam serenitatem naturae summae uiuentis adtollimus?

### English translation (Claude)

You must remember the question often tossed about between us, which tossed us about as we panted and burned: namely, about a kind of perpetual body, or quasi-body, of the soul, which you remember some also call its vehicle. It is clear that this thing, if indeed it moves from place to place, is not intelligible. But whatever is not intelligible cannot be understood. Yet when something escapes the understanding, if at least it does not escape the senses, a probable estimate of it is not altogether ruled out. But what can be neither understood nor perceived gives rise to an opinion that is too rash and trifling. And the thing we are discussing is of this kind, if indeed it exists. Why, then, I ask you, do we not declare a holiday from this little question, and, having prayed to God, lift our whole selves to the supreme serenity of the supreme living nature?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 13.2 (CSEL 34.1:30–31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-2).

## Letter 13.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine raises the objection that the existence of a body can be known by the understanding even if the body itself is perceived only by sense.

### Latin text

Hic forsitan dicas, quamquam corporea percipi nequeant, multa nos tamen ad corpus pertinentia intellegibiliter posse percipere, ut est, quod nouimus esse corpus. quis enim neget aut quis hoc uerisimile potius quam uerum esse fateatur? ita cum ipsum corpus uerisimile sit, esse tamen in natura tale quiddam uerissimum est. ergo corpus sensibile, esse autem corpus intellegibile iudicatur; non enim posset aliter percipi. ita nescio quid illud, de quo quaerimus, corpus, quo inniti anima, ut de loco in locum transeat, putatur, quamquam etiam si non sensibus nostris, tamen quibusdam longe uegetioribus sensibile sit, utrum tamen sit, intellegibiliter cognosci potest.

### English translation (Claude)

Here perhaps you may say that, though bodily things cannot be perceived by the understanding, we can nevertheless perceive intelligibly many things that pertain to body, such as our knowing that body exists. For who would deny this, or who would admit that it is probable rather than true? So, though body itself is a matter of probability, yet that there is such a thing in nature is most true. Therefore body is judged sensible, but that body exists is judged intelligible; for otherwise it could not be perceived. So that body, whatever it is, which we are asking about, on which the soul is thought to rely in passing from place to place: even if it is perceptible, not to our senses but to some far livelier ones, still whether it exists can be known intelligibly.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 13.3 (CSEL 34.1:31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-3).

## Letter 13.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:31–32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that, since we cannot perceive such a body, its existence cannot be known by us and the question does not concern us.

### Latin text

Hoc si dices, ueniat in mentem illud, quod intellegere appellamus, duobus modis in nobis fieri: aut ipsa per se mente atque ratione intrinsecus, ut cum intellegimus esse ipsum intellectum; aut admonitione a sensibus, ut id quod iam dictum est, cum intellegimus esse corpus. in quibus duobus generibus illud primum per nos, id est de eo, quod apud nos est, deum consulendo; hoc autem secundum de eo, quod a corpore sensuque nuntiatur, nihilo minus deum consulendo intellegimus. quae si rata sunt, nemo de illo corpore, utrum sit, intellegere potest, nisi cui sensus quicquam de illo nuntiarit. in quo animantium numero, si ullus est, nos quoniam non esse perspicimus, illud etiam perfectum puto, quod supra dicere coeperam, non ad nos istam pertinere quaestionem. haec etiam atque etiam cogites velim et, quod cogitando genueris, ut nouerim cures.

### English translation (Claude)

If you say this, remember that what we call understanding takes place in us in two ways: either by the mind and reason itself within, as when we understand that understanding itself exists; or through a prompting from the senses, as in the case just mentioned, when we understand that body exists. Of these two kinds, we understand the first through ourselves, that is, about what is within us, by consulting God; and the second, about what is reported by the body and the senses, we understand no less by consulting God. If these things are settled, no one can understand whether that body exists unless the senses have reported something about it to him. And since we see that we are not in that class of living beings, if there is any, I think that what I began to say above is also established: that this question does not concern us. I would like you to think about these things again and again, and to make sure that I learn what your thinking has produced.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 13.4 (CSEL 34.1:31–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-13-4).

## Letter 14.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Nebridius that he is answering his latest letter first, since he lacks the leisure for a long reply to the earlier ones.

### Latin text

Recentissimis litteris tuis respondere malui, non quod contempserim praecedentia quaesita tua minusue me delectauerint, sed quod in respondendo maiora, quam opinaris, molior. quamquam enim longiorem, quam longissima est, epistulam tibi mittendam esse praescripseris, non tamen tantum habemus otii, quantum existimas et quantum nos semper optasse nosti et optamus. ne quaeras, cur ita sit; illa enim facilius, quibus impedior, quam cur impediar, exposuerim.

### English translation (Claude)

I have preferred to answer your latest letter, not because I despised your earlier questions or because they delighted me less, but because in answering them I am attempting greater things than you suppose. For although you have prescribed that I should send you a letter longer than the longest, we do not have as much leisure as you think, and as you know we have always wished for and still wish for. Do not ask why this is so; for I could more easily explain the things that hinder me than why I am hindered.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Nebridius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 14.1 (CSEL 34.1:32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-1).

## Letter 14.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:32–33
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Nebridius that the sun shares many actions with the stars, and that no two bodies, not even twins walking together, can ever perform exactly the same movement.

### Latin text

Scribis, cur ego et tu, cum simus singuli, eadem multa faciamus, sol autem non idem faciat quod cetera sidera cuius rei causam conarer. nam si eadem nos agimus, multa et ille cum ceteris agit; si non ille, nec nos. ambulo et ambulas, mouetur et mouentur; uigilo et uigilas, lucet et lucent; disputo et disputas, circuit et circumeunt. tametsi actus animi nullo modo est his, quae uidemus, comparandus. si autem animum, ita ut aequum est, animo conferas, magis idem uel cogitare uel contemplari uel si quid aliud commodius dicitur, si ullus eis inest animus, sidera quam homines consideranda sunt. ceterum in corporum motibus si, ut soles, diligenter adtendas, nihil omnino a duobus idem fieri potest. an tu, cum deambulamus simul, satis idem nos agere existimas? absit a prudentia tua. septentrioni namque uicinior nostrum qui deambulat, aut alterum pari motu antecedat aut tardius ingrediatur necesse est; neutrum tamen sentiri potest. sed tu, ni fallor, quid intellegamus, non quid sentiamus, expectas. quod si ab axe in meridiem tendamus, coniuncti nobis atque inhaerentes, quantum ualemus, innitamurque marmori leui et aequali uel etiam ebori, tam non potest esse amborum idem motus quam uenae pulsus, quam forma, quam facies. remoue nos et pone Glauciam prolem, nihil egeris. quippe his etiam simillimis geminis tanta est necessitas, ut proprie moueantur, quanta fuit, ut singuli nascerentur.

### English translation (Claude)

You write asking why you and I, though each of us is a single individual, do many of the same things, while the sun does not do the same as the other stars; and I am to attempt the cause of this. Now if we do the same things, the sun too does many things along with the others; if it does not, neither do we. I walk and you walk; it moves and they move. I am awake and you are awake; it shines and they shine. I discuss and you discuss; it goes round and they go round. And yet the action of the mind is in no way to be compared with these things that we see. But if you compare mind with mind, as is fair, the stars, if they have any mind in them, should be considered more alike than human beings in thinking or contemplating, or whatever else may be said more suitably. Moreover, in the movements of bodies, if you attend carefully, as you are accustomed to do, nothing at all can be done identically by two. Or do you think that when we walk together we are really doing the same thing? Far be that from your prudence. For whichever of us walks nearer the north must either get ahead of the other with an equal motion or step more slowly; yet neither can be perceived. But you, unless I am mistaken, are waiting to hear what we understand, not what we perceive. Now if we headed from the pole toward the south, joined to each other and clinging together as tightly as we can, and pressed on smooth, level marble or even ivory, the motion of the two of us could no more be the same than the beat of our pulses, our shape, or our face. Remove us and put in the offspring of Glaucia; you will have achieved nothing. For even for these most similar twins, it is as necessary that each be moved in his own way as it was that each be born as an individual.

### Translation notes

- 'The offspring of Glaucia': a pair of proverbially identical twins.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 14.2 (CSEL 34.1:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-2).

## Letter 14.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:33–34
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the sun's unique brightness among the stars with the unique greatness of the man Christ, whom God assumed in a way unlike any other saint.

### Latin text

At enim hoc, inquies, rationi tantum; quod autem sol ab astris differt, sensibus etiam clarum atque manifestum est. si magnitudinem me cogis dispicere, nosti de interuallis quam multa dicantur et ad quantum incertum perspicuitas ista reuocetur. sed ut concedam ita esse, ut apparet, sic enim et credo, cuius tandem et sensum fefellit illa proceritas Naeuii pede longioris, quam qui est sex longissimus? cui te credo nimium quaesisse hominem aequalem et, cum minime repperisses, usque in eius formam nostram epistulam tendere uoluisse. quare cum in terris quoque tale aliquid existat, nihil de caelo puto esse mirandum. si autem te monet, quod praeter solem nullius sideris lumen implet diem, quis, quaeso te, hominibus tantus apparuit quantus homo ille, quem deus suscepit longe aliter quam ceteros sanctos atque sapientes? quem si cum aliis hominibus conferas, maiore distantia continentur quam conlatione solis cetera sidera. quam sane similitudinem diligenter intuere. fieri enim potest mente, qua excellis, ut quandam quaestionem de homine Christo a te propositam transeuntes dissoluerimus.

### English translation (Claude)

'But,' you will say, 'this is only for reason; that the sun differs from the stars is clear and manifest even to the senses.' If you compel me to examine its size, you know how much is said about distances and to what uncertainty that apparent clarity is reduced. But granting that it is as it appears (and so I believe), whose senses, pray, did the tallness of Naevius ever escape, a foot taller than the tallest six-foot man? I believe you looked too hard for a man to match him, and when you could not find one, you wanted to stretch our letter to his length. So, since something like this exists on earth also, I think there is nothing to wonder at in the sky. But if it strikes you that the light of no star but the sun fills the day, who, I ask you, has appeared to human beings as great as that man whom God assumed, far otherwise than the other saints and wise men? If you compare him with other men, he is separated from them by a greater distance than the other stars when compared with the sun. Look carefully at this comparison. For it may be, with the mind in which you excel, that in passing we have solved a question you proposed about the man Christ.

### Translation notes

- Naevius: apparently a man of extraordinary height known to both correspondents.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 14.3 (CSEL 34.1:33–34; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-3).

## Letter 14.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:34–35
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine suggests that the divine Wisdom, the Son, contains the idea of man in general for creation and the ideas of individual men in the order of time, as a square requires the idea of four angles.

### Latin text

Item quaeris, utrum summa illa ueritas et summa sapientia, forma rerum, per quam facta sunt omnia, quem filium dei unicum sacra nostra profitentur, generaliter hominis, an etiam uniuscuiusque nostrum rationem contineat. magna quaestio. sed mihi uidetur, quod ad hominem faciendum adtinet, hominis quidem tantum, non meam uel tuam ibi esse rationem; quod autem ad orbem temporis, uarias hominum rationes in illa sinceritate uiuere. uerum hoc cum obscurissimum sit, qua similitudine inlustrari possit, ignoro, nisi forte ad artes illas, quae insunt animo nostro, confugiendum est. nam in disciplina metiendi una est anguli ratio, una quadrati. itaque quotiens demonstrare angulum uolo, non nisi una ratio anguli mihi occurrit; sed quadratum nequaquam scriberem, nisi quattuor simul angulorum rationem intuerer. ita quilibet homo una ratione, qua homo intellegitur, factus est; at ut populus fiat, quamuis et ipsa una ratio, non tamen hominis ratio, sed hominum. si igitur pars huius uniuersi est Nebridius, sicut est, et omne uniuersum partibus confit, non potuit uniuersi conditor deus rationem partium non habere. quam ob rem quod plurimorum hominum ibi ratio est, non ad ipsum hominem pertinet, quamquam miris rursum modis ad unum omnia redigantur. sed tu id commodius cogitabis. his contentus sis interim peto, quamquam iam excesserim Naeuium.

### English translation (Claude)

You also ask whether that supreme truth and supreme wisdom, the form of things, through which all things were made, whom our sacred rites confess as the only Son of God, contains the idea of man in general, or also of each one of us. A great question. But it seems to me that, as far as the making of man is concerned, the idea there is of man only, not of me or of you; but as far as the cycle of time is concerned, the various ideas of men live in that purity. But since this is very obscure, I do not know by what comparison it could be illustrated, unless perhaps we must take refuge in those arts which are present in our mind. For in the science of measurement there is one idea of an angle and one of a square. So whenever I want to show an angle, only one idea, that of an angle, comes to me; but I could never draw a square without looking at the idea of four angles together. So each man has been made by the one idea by which man is understood; but for a people to be made, although that too is one idea, it is not the idea of man but of men. If, then, Nebridius is a part of this universe, as he is, and every universe is made up of parts, God the founder of the universe could not fail to have the idea of the parts. Therefore, that the idea of very many men is there does not pertain to man as such, although in wonderful ways all things are again brought back to one. But you will think about this better. I ask you to be content with this meanwhile, although I have already outrun Naevius.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'I have already outrun Naevius': the letter is now longer than Naevius was tall (see 14.3). 'Through which all things were made' echoes John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 14.4 (CSEL 34.1:34–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-14-4).

## Letter 15.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-15-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:35–36
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Romanianus on parchment for lack of paper, mentions a work he has written on the Catholic religion, and leaves him free to take the books he wants.

### Latin text

Non haec epistula sic inopiam chartae indicat, ut membranas saltem abundare testetur? tabellas eburneas, quas habeo, auunculo tuo cum litteris misi. tu enim huic pelliculae facilius ignosces, quia differri non potuit, quod ei scripsi, et tibi non scribere etiam ineptissimum existimaui. sed tabellas, si quae ibi nostrae sunt, propter huius modi necessitates mittas peto. scripsi quiddam de catholica religione, quantum dominus dare dignatus est, quod tibi uolo ante aduentum meum mittere, si charta interim non desit. tolerabis enim qualemcumque scripturam ex officina Maiorini. de codicibus praeter libros de Oratore totum mihi excidit. sed nihil amplius rescribere potui, quam ut ipse sumeres, quos liberet, et nunc in eadem maneo sententia. absens enim quid plus faciam, non inuenio.

### English translation (Claude)

Does this letter not show a shortage of paper in such a way as to testify at least that parchment is plentiful? The ivory tablets I have I sent with a letter to your uncle. You will more easily forgive this bit of skin, because what I wrote to him could not be put off, and I thought it most improper not to write to you as well. But please send any tablets of ours that are there, for necessities of this kind. I have written something about the Catholic religion, as far as the Lord has deigned to grant, which I want to send you before I come, if paper does not run short meanwhile. For you will put up with any sort of writing from Majorinus's workshop. As for the books, apart from the books On the Orator, it has all slipped my mind. But I could write back nothing more than that you should take whichever you liked yourself, and I remain of the same view now. For, being absent, I do not see what more I can do.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Romanianus. The work on the Catholic religion is probably On True Religion. Majorinus is apparently the copyist or scriptorium that produced Augustine's copies.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 15.1 (CSEL 34.1:35–36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-15-1).

## Letter 15.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-15-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:36–37
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Romanianus not to trust his present prosperity and urges him to use temporal goods faithfully while seeking eternal ones.

### Latin text

Gratissimum mihi est, quod in ultima epistula me participem domestici tui gaudii facere uoluisti. sed Mene salis placidi uultum fluctusque quietos ignorare iubes? quamquam nec me iubeas nec ipse ignores. quare si ad melius cogitandum quies aliqua data est, utere diuino beneficio. nec enim nobis debemus, cum ista proueniunt, sed illis, per quos proueniunt, gratulari, quoniam iusta et officiosa et pro suo genere pacatior atque tranquillior rerum temporalium administratio recipiendorum aeternorum meritum gignit, si non teneat, cum tenetur, non implicet, cum multiplicatur, si non, cum......... putatur, inuoluat. ipsius enim ueritatis ore dictum est: Si in alieno fideles non fuistis, uestrum quis dabit uobis? laxatis ergo curis mutabilium rerum bona stabilia et certa quaeramus, superuolemus terrenis opibus nostris. nam et in mellis copia non frustra pennas habet apicula; necat enim haerentem.

### English translation (Claude)

I am most grateful that in your last letter you wished to make me a sharer in your joy at home. But 'do you bid me be ignorant of the face of the calm sea and the quiet waves?' Though you do not bid me, nor are you yourself ignorant of them. So if some quiet has been given you for better thinking, make use of the divine gift. For when such things come, we should congratulate not ourselves but those through whom they come, since a just and dutiful administration of temporal things, more peaceful and tranquil for its kind, earns the receiving of eternal things, if it does not hold fast when it is held, does not entangle when it is multiplied, does not, when … is thought, wrap us up. For it was said by the mouth of Truth itself: 'If you have not been faithful in what belongs to another, who will give you what is yours?' So let us loosen our cares for changeable things and seek goods that are stable and certain; let us fly above our earthly wealth. For it is not for nothing that the bee has wings amid an abundance of honey; for honey kills the bee that sticks in it.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:12: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 5.848–849 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The verse is Virgil, Aeneid 5.848–849 (Palinurus). A word is missing in the printed text before 'putatur' (marked '…'). 'Truth itself': Christ, quoting Luke 16:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 15.2 (CSEL 34.1:36–37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/9-1/#p-15-2).

## Letter 16.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:37
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Maximus of Madaura, a pagan grammarian, writes to Augustine that the many gods are names for the powers of the one supreme God.

### Latin text

Auens crebro tuis affatibus laetificari et instinctu tui sermonis, quod me paulo ante iucundissime salua caritate pulsasti, paria redhibere non destiti, ne silentium meum paenitudinem appellasses. sed quaeso, ut, si haec quasi seniles artus esse duxeris, benignarum aurium indulgentia prosequaris. Olympum montem deorum esse habitaculum sub incerta fide Graecia fabulatur. at uero nostrae urbis forum salutarium numinum frequentia possessum nos cernimus et probamus. et quidem unum esse deum summum sine initio, sine prole naturae ceu patrem magnum atque magnificum quis tam demens, tam mente captus neget esse certissimum? huius nos uirtutes per mundanum opus diffusas multis uocabulis inuocamus, quoniam nomen eius cuncti proprium uidelicet ignoramus. nam deus omnibus religionibus commune nomen est. ita fit, ut, dum eius quasi quaedam membra carptim uariis supplicationibus prosequimur, totum colere profecto uideamur.

### English translation (Claude)

Longing to be gladdened often by your addresses, and spurred by the discourse with which, a little while ago, you very pleasantly struck at me without breach of love, I have not ceased to pay you back in kind, lest you should call my silence repentance. But I ask that, if you consider these the limbs, as it were, of an old man, you receive them with the indulgence of kindly ears. Greece tells the tale, on uncertain credit, that Mount Olympus is the dwelling place of the gods. But we see and know for certain that the forum of our city is occupied by a throng of saving deities. And indeed, who is so mad, so out of his mind, as to deny that it is most certain that there is one supreme God, without beginning, without natural offspring, like a great and magnificent father? His powers, diffused through the work of the world, we invoke by many names, since we are all evidently ignorant of his proper name. For 'god' is a name common to all religions. So it comes about that, while we approach his members, as it were, one by one with various supplications, we are seen to worship him whole.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Maximus of Madaura to Augustine, written as a pagan; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 16.1 (CSEL 34.1:37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-1).

## Letter 16.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:37–38
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Maximus mocks the Christian veneration of African martyrs with Punic names and their tombs.

### Latin text

Sed inpatientem me esse tanti erroris dissimulare non possum. quis enim ferat Ioui fulmina uibranti praeferri Migginem, Iunoni, Mineruae, Veneri Vestaeque Sanamem et cunctis, pro nefas! diis inmortalibus archimartyrem Namphamonem? inter quos Lucitas etiam haud minore cultu suspicitur atque alii interminato numero, diis hominibusque odiosa nomina, qui conscientia nefandorum facinorum specie gloriosae mortis scelera sua sceleribus cumulantes dignum moribus factisque suis exitum maculati reppererunt. horum busta, si memoratu dignum est, relictis templis, neglectis maiorum suorum manibus stulti frequentant, ita ut praesagium uatis illius indigne ferentis emineat: Inque deum templis iurabit Roma per umbras. sed mihi hac tempestate propemodum uidetur bellum Actiacum rursus exortum, quo Aegyptia monstra in Romanorum deos audeant tela uibrare minime duratura.

### English translation (Claude)

But I cannot conceal that I am impatient of so great an error. For who could bear that Miggin should be preferred to Jupiter hurling his thunderbolts, Sanam to Juno, Minerva, Venus and Vesta, and, oh the outrage, the archmartyr Namphamo to all the immortal gods? Among them Lucitas too is looked up to with no less worship, and others without number, names hateful to gods and men, who, conscious of unspeakable crimes, heaping crimes on crimes under the guise of a glorious death, have found, stained as they were, an end worthy of their character and deeds. Their tombs (if it is worth mentioning) are crowded by fools who leave the temples and neglect the shades of their own ancestors, so that the prophecy of that bard who bore it with indignation stands out: 'And in the temples of the gods Rome will swear by shades.' But to me it seems almost as if in this time the battle of Actium had broken out again, in which Egyptian monsters dare to hurl at the gods of the Romans weapons that will not last long.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Lucan, 7.459 (Lucan, Civil War): quotation, high confidence
- Virgil, Aen. 8.698 (Virgil): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Miggin, Sanam, Namphamo and Lucitas are Punic names of African martyrs; Maximus's charge that they died as criminals is his own polemic. The verse is Lucan, Pharsalia 7.459. 'Egyptian monsters' at Actium recalls Virgil, Aeneid 8.698.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 16.2 (CSEL 34.1:37–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-2).

## Letter 16.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:38–39
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Maximus challenges Augustine to show plainly who the Christian God is, contrasting pagan public worship with Christian secrecy.

### Latin text

Sed illud quaeso, uir sapientissime, uti remoto facundiae robore atque exploso, qua cunctis clarus es, omissis etiam, quibus pugnare solebas, Chrysippeis argumentis postposita paululum dialectica, quae neruorum suorum luctamine nihil certi cuiquam relinquere nititur, ipsa re adprobes, qui sit iste deus, quem uobis Christiani quasi proprium uindicatis et in locis abditis praesentem uos uidere componitis. nos etenim deos nostros luce palam ante oculos atque aures omnium mortalium piis precibus adoramus et per suaues hostias propitios nobis efficimus et a cunctis haec cerni et probari contendimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But I ask this of you, most wise man: setting aside and discarding the strength of eloquence for which you are famous among all, leaving aside also the Chrysippean arguments with which you used to fight, and putting aside for a little the dialectic which strives by the struggle of its sinews to leave nothing certain to anyone, prove by the thing itself who that god is whom you Christians claim as your own and pretend to see present in hidden places. For we worship our gods openly in the light, before the eyes and ears of all mortals, with pious prayers, and make them favourable to us by pleasing sacrifices, and we are eager that these things be seen and approved by all.

### Translation notes

- Chrysippus: the Stoic logician.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 16.3 (CSEL 34.1:38–39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-3).

## Letter 16.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:39
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Maximus withdraws from the debate, citing Virgil, and closes with a pagan blessing.

### Latin text

Sed ulterius huic certamini me senex inualidus subtraho et in sententiam Mantuani rhetoris libenter pergo: Trahat sua quemque uoluptas. post haec non dubito, uir eximie, qui a mea secta deuiasti, hanc epistulam aliquorum furto detractam flammis uel quolibet pacto perituram. quod si acciderit, erit damnum chartulae, non nostri sermonis, cuius exemplar penes omnes religiosos perpetuo retinebo. dii te seruent, per quos et eorum atque cunctorum mortalium communem patrem uniuersi mortales, quos terra sustinet, mille modis concordi discordia ueneramur et colimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But, a weak old man, I withdraw from this contest any further and gladly follow the opinion of the Mantuan rhetor: 'Each is drawn by his own pleasure.' After this, excellent man, who have strayed from my sect, I do not doubt that this letter will be stolen by someone and perish in flames or in some other way. If that happens, it will be the loss of the paper, not of my words, a copy of which I will keep for ever with all religious people. May the gods preserve you, through whom all of us mortals whom the earth sustains venerate and worship in a thousand ways, in harmonious discord, the common father of them and of all mortals.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Ecl. 2.65 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The 'Mantuan rhetor' is Virgil; the line is Eclogues 2.65.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 16.4 (CSEL 34.1:39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-16-4).

## Letter 17.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:39–41
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Maximus that his comparison of Olympus with the gods in the forum of Madaura is a joke, and warns him against calling such gods members of the one God.

### Latin text

Seriumne aliquid inter nos agimus, an iocari libet? nam sicut tua epistula loquitur, utrum causae ipsius infirmitate, an morum tuorum comitate sit factum, ut malles esse facetior quam paratior, incertum habeo. primo enim Olympi montis et fori uestri comparatio facta est, quae nescio quo pertinuerit, nisi ut me commonefaceret et in illo monte Iouem castra posuisse, cum aduersus patrem bellum gereret, ut ea docet historia, quam uestri etiam sacram uocant, et in isto foro recordarer esse in duobus simulacris unum Martem nudum, alterum armatum, quorum daemonium infestissimum ciuibus porrectis tribus digitis contra conlocata statua humana comprimeret. ergone umquam ego crediderim mentione illius fori facta numinum talium memoriam mihi te renouare uoluisse, nisi iocari potius quam serie agere maluisses? sed illud plane, quod tales deos quaedam dei unius magni membra esse dixisti, admoneo, quia dignaris, ut ab huius modi sacrilegis facetiis te magnopere abstineas. si quidem illum deum dicis unum, de quo, ut dictum est a ueteribus, docti indoctique consentiunt, huiusne tu membra dicis esse, quorum iam immanitatem uel, si hoc mauis, potentiam mortui hominis imago compescit? plura hinc possim dicere; uides enim pro tua prudentia, quam late locus iste pateat reprehensioni. sed me ipse cohibeo, ne a te rhetorice potius quam ueridice agere existimer.

### English translation (Claude)

Are we dealing with something serious between us, or do you wish to joke? For, judging by the way your letter speaks, I am uncertain whether it was due to the weakness of the cause itself or to the courtesy of your manners that you preferred to be witty rather than well prepared. For first came a comparison of Mount Olympus and your forum, and I do not know what it was meant to do, unless to remind me that Jupiter pitched his camp on that mountain when he was waging war against his father, as that history teaches which even your people call sacred, and to make me remember that in this forum there are two images of Mars, one naked, the other armed, whose demon, most hostile to the citizens, a human statue placed opposite holds in check with three fingers stretched out. Would I ever believe that by mentioning that forum you wished to renew in me the memory of such deities, unless you preferred to joke rather than act seriously? But as for your statement that such gods are certain members of the one great God, I warn you, since you deign to hear it, to abstain carefully from sacrilegious jokes of this kind. If you speak of the one God about whom, as the ancients said, the learned and unlearned agree, do you say that those are his members whose savagery, or, if you prefer, power, the image of a dead man holds in check? I could say more on this; for with your prudence you see how wide a field for criticism this point opens. But I restrain myself, so as not to be thought by you to act rhetorically rather than truthfully.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Maximus of Madaura. 'The history which your people call sacred' is probably the Sacred History of Euhemerus, which presented the gods as deified men.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 17.1 (CSEL 34.1:39–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-1).

## Letter 17.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:41–42
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Maximus's mockery of Punic martyrs' names by explaining the meaning of Namphamo, citing Virgil, and pointing to absurd Roman gods.

### Latin text

Nam quod nomina quaedam mortuorum Punica collegisti, quibus in nostram religionem festiuas, ut tibi uisum est, contumelias iaciendas putares, nescio, utrum refellere debeam, an silentio praeterire. si enim res istae tam uidentur leues tuae grauitati, quam sunt, iocari mihi non multum uacat; si autem graues tibi uidentur, miror, quod nominum absurditate commoto in mentem non uenerit habere uos et in sacerdotibus Euoaddires et in numinibus Abaddires. non puto ego ista tibi, cum scriberes, in animo non fuisse, sed more humanitatis et leporis tui commonefacere nos uoluisti ad relaxandum animum, quanta in uestra superstitione ridenda sint. neque enim usque adeo te ipsum obliuisci potuisses, ut homo Afer scribens Afris, cum simus utrique in Africa constituti, Punica nomina exagitanda existimares. nam si ea uocabula interpretemur, Namphamo quid aliud significat quam boni pedis hominem? id est, cuius aduentus adferat aliquid felicitatis, sicut solemus dicere secundo pede introisse, cuius introitum prosperitas aliqua consecuta sit. quae lingua si inprobatur abs te, nega Punicis libris, ut a uiris doctissimis proditur, multa sapienter esse mandata memoriae; paeniteat te certe ibi natum, ubi huius linguae cunabula recalent. si uero et sonus nobis noster non rationabiliter displicet et me bene interpretatum illud uocabulum recognoscis, habes quod suscenseas Vergilio tuo, qui Herculem uestrum ad sacra, quae illi ab Euandro celebrantur, inuitat hoc modo: Et nos et tua dexter adi pede sacra secundo. secundo pede optat ut ueniat. ergo uenire optat Herculem Namphamonem, de quo tu multum nobis insultare dignaris. uerum tamen si ridere delectat, habes apud uos magnam materiam facetiarum: deum Stercutium, deam Cluacinam, Venerem Caluam, deum Timorem, deum Pallorem, deam Febrem et cetera innumerabilia huiusce modi, quibus Romani antiqui simulacrorum cultores templa fecerunt et colenda censuerunt. quae si neglegis, Romanos deos neglegis, ex quo intellegeris non Romanis initiatus sacris, et tamen Punica nomina tamquam nimium Romanorum altaribus deditus contemnis ac despicis.

### English translation (Claude)

As for your collecting certain Punic names of the dead, with which you thought you could hurl what seemed to you witty insults at our religion, I do not know whether I should refute it or pass over it in silence. For if these things seem to your seriousness as light as they are, I have little time for joking; but if they seem serious to you, I am surprised that, troubled as you are by the absurdity of names, it did not occur to you that you have Eucaddires among your priests and Abaddires among your deities. I do not think these were absent from your mind when you wrote, but in keeping with your kindness and wit you wanted to remind us, to relax our minds, how much in your superstition is laughable. For you could not have so forgotten yourself that, an African writing to Africans, when we are both settled in Africa, you would think Punic names should be ridiculed. For if we interpret those words, what else does Namphamo mean but 'a man of good foot', that is, one whose coming brings some good fortune, as we are accustomed to say that someone has come in 'with a favourable foot' when some prosperity has followed his coming? If you disapprove of this language, deny that, as very learned men report, many things have been wisely committed to memory in Punic books; you must certainly regret having been born where the cradle of this language is still warm. But if our own sound does not reasonably displease us, and you recognize that I have interpreted that word well, you have grounds to be angry with your Virgil, who invites your Hercules to the rites celebrated to him by Evander in this way: 'Come, propitious, to us and to your rites with favourable foot.' He wishes him to come with favourable foot. So he wishes Hercules to come as a Namphamo, over whom you deign to insult us so much. However, if laughing pleases you, you have among you great material for jokes: the god Stercutius, the goddess Cloacina, the Bald Venus, the god Fear, the god Pallor, the goddess Fever, and countless others of this kind, to which the ancient Romans, worshippers of images, built temples and decreed that they should be worshipped. If you neglect these, you neglect Roman gods, from which it is understood that you are not initiated in Roman rites; and yet you despise and look down on Punic names as if you were too devoted to the altars of the Romans.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 8.302 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The verse is Virgil, Aeneid 8.302.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 17.2 (CSEL 34.1:41–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-2).

## Letter 17.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:42–43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns Virgil against Maximus, noting that Virgil and Cicero present the gods as having once been men.

### Latin text

Sed mihi uideris omnino plus quam nos fortasse illa sacra nihili pendere, sed ex eis nescio quam captare ad huius uitae transitum uoluptatem, quippe qui etiam non dubitaueris ad Maronem confugere, ut scribis, et eius uersu te tueri, quo ait: Trahit sua quemque uoluptas. nam si tibi auctoritas Maronis placet, sicut placere significas, profecto etiam illud placet: Primus ab aetherio uenit Saturnus Olympo arma Iouis fugiens et regnis exul ademptis et cetera, quibus eum atque huius modi deos uestros uult intellegi homines fuisse. legerat enim ille mysticam historiam uetusta auctoritate roboratam, quam etiam Tullius legerat, qui hoc idem in dialogis plus, quam postulare auderemus, commemorat et perducere in hominum notitiam, quantum illa tempora patiebantur, molitur.

### English translation (Claude)

But you seem to me perhaps to count those rites as nothing, even more than we do, and to catch from them some sort of pleasure for the passage through this life, since you did not hesitate to take refuge in Maro, as you write, and protect yourself with his verse in which he says: 'Each is drawn by his own pleasure.' For if Maro's authority pleases you, as you indicate it does, surely this also pleases you: 'First from heavenly Olympus came Saturn, fleeing the arms of Jupiter, an exile, his kingdom taken from him', and the rest, by which he wishes it to be understood that he and your gods of this kind were men. For he had read the mystical history confirmed by ancient authority, which Tullius too had read, who mentions this same thing in his dialogues more than we would dare to ask, and strives to bring it to people's knowledge as far as those times allowed.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Ecl. 2.65 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence
- Virgil, Aen. 8.319–320 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Nat. d. (Cicero): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The verses are Virgil, Eclogues 2.65 and Aeneid 8.319–320. Tullius is Cicero (compare On the Nature of the Gods).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 17.3 (CSEL 34.1:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-3).

## Letter 17.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the charge of Christian secrecy by pointing to the secret rites of Liber and the frenzied public processions of Madaura's leading men.

### Latin text

Quod autem dicis eo nostris uestra sacra praeponi, quod uos publice colitis deos, nos autem secretioribus conuenticulis utimur, primo illud abs te quaero, quo modo oblitus sis Liberum illum, quem paucorum sacratorum oculis committendum putatis. deinde tu ipse iudicas nihil aliud te agere uoluisse, cum publicam sacrorum uestrorum celebrationem commemorares, nisi ut nobis decuriones et primates ciuitatis per plateas uestrae urbis bacchantes ac furentes ante oculos quasi specula poneremus. in qua celebritate si numine inhabitamini, certe uidetis, quale illud sit, quod adimit mentem; si autem fingitis, quae sunt ista etiam in publico uestra secreta? uel quo pertinet tam turpe mendacium? deinde cur nulla futura canitis, si uates estis? aut cur spoliatis circumstantes, si sani estis?

### English translation (Claude)

As for your saying that your rites are to be preferred to ours because you worship the gods publicly while we use more secret little gatherings, first I ask you how you have forgotten that Liber of yours, whom you think should be shown only to the eyes of a few initiates. Next, you yourself judge that, when you mentioned the public celebration of your rites, you wanted nothing else than that we should set before our eyes, as in a mirror, the councillors and leading men of the city raving like bacchants through the streets of your town. In that celebration, if you are possessed by a deity, you surely see what kind of thing it is that takes away the mind; but if you are pretending, what are these secrets of yours even in public? Or what is the purpose of so shameful a lie? Next, why do you foretell nothing of the future, if you are prophets? Or why do you rob the bystanders, if you are sane?

### Translation notes

- Liber: Bacchus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 17.4 (CSEL 34.1:43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-4).

## Letter 17.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:43–44
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine invites Maximus to a serious discussion and states that Catholic Christians worship no dead person and no creature, but only the one God who made all things.

### Latin text

Cum igitur haec nos et alia, quae nunc praetermittenda existimo, per epistulam tuam feceris recordari, quid nos derideamus deos uestros, quos abs te ipso subtiliter derideri nemo non intellegit, qui et ingenium tuum nouit et legit litteras tuas? itaque si aliquid inter nos de his rebus uis agamus, quod aetati prudentiaeque tuae congruit, quod denique de nostro proposito iure a carissimis nostris flagitari potest, quaere aliquid nostra discussione dignum et ea pro uestris numinibus cura dicere, in quibus non te causae praeuaricatorem putemus, quod nos magis commoneas, quae contra illos dici possint, quam pro eis aliquid dicas. ad summam tamen ne te hoc lateat et in sacrilega conuicia inprudentem trahat, scias a Christianis catholicis, quorum in uestro oppido etiam ecclesia constituta est, nullum coli mortuorum, nihil denique ut numen adorari, quod sit factum et conditum a deo, sed unum ipsum deum, qui fecit et condidit omnia. disserentur ista latius ipso uero et uno deo adiuuante, cum te grauiter agere uelle cognouero.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, you have made us recall these things and others which I think should now be passed over, why should we mock your gods, when no one who knows your talent and has read your letter fails to understand that you yourself mock them subtly? So if you want us to discuss something about these matters between us that befits your age and prudence, and that, finally, can rightly be asked of us, given our way of life, by those dearest to us, look for something worthy of our discussion, and take care to say on behalf of your deities things in which we may not think you a betrayer of your cause, reminding us rather of what can be said against them than saying anything for them. In sum, however, so that this may not escape you and draw you unawares into sacrilegious abuse, know that by the Catholic Christians, who also have a church established in your town, none of the dead is worshipped, and, in short, nothing is adored as a deity that was made and established by God, but only the one God himself, who made and established all things. These matters will be discussed more fully with the help of the one true God himself, when I learn that you wish to act seriously.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 17.5 (CSEL 34.1:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-17-5).

## Letter 18.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-18-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:44–45
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Celestinus to return his books against the Manichaeans with his opinion of them.

### Latin text

O utinam possem assidue tibi aliquid dicere! id autem aliquid est, ut curis exueremur inanibus et curis indueremur utilibus. nam de securitate nescio utrum quicquam in hoc mundo sperandum sit. scripsi nec recepi ulla rescripta. misi aduersum Manichaeos libros, quos paratos et emendatos mittere potui, nec quicquam ex illis iudicii motusque uestri notum mihi factum est. nunc eos repetere iam me, uos autem restituere conuenit. peto itaque, ne differatis eos remittere cum rescriptis, quibus nosse cupio, quid de illis geritis uel adhuc ad illum errorem expugnandum quid armaturae uobis opus esse arbitremini.

### English translation (Claude)

Oh, if only I could constantly say something to you! And that something is that we should strip off empty cares and put on useful ones. For as to security, I do not know whether any is to be hoped for in this world. I have written and received no replies. I sent the books against the Manichaeans which I was able to send ready and corrected, and nothing of your judgment or reaction to them has been made known to me. Now it is fitting that I ask for them back and that you return them. So I ask you not to delay sending them back with a reply in which I want to learn what you are doing with them, or what further armour you think you need for defeating that error.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Celestinus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 18.1 (CSEL 34.1:44–45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-18-1).

## Letter 18.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-18-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:45–46
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out three natures: body, changeable in place and time; soul, changeable in time only; and God, unchangeable, to whom the soul must turn through faith in Christ.

### Latin text

Sane quoniam te noui, accipe hoc quiddam grande et breue. est natura per locos et tempora mutabilis, ut corpus, et est natura per locos nullo modo, sed tantum per tempora etiam ipsa mutabilis, ut anima, et est natura, quae nec per locos nec per tempora mutari potest, hoc deus est. quod hic insinuaui quoquo modo mutabile, creatura dicitur; quod inmutabile, creator. cum autem omne, quod esse dicimus, in quantum manet dicamus et in quantum unum est, omnis porro pulchritudinis forma unitatis sit, uides profecto in ista distributione naturarum, quid summe sit, quid infime et tamen sit, quid medie, magis infimo et minus summo, sit. summum illud est ipsa beatitas; infimum nec beatum potest esse nec miserum; quod uero medium, uiuit inclinatione ad infimum misere, conuersione ad summum beate uiuit. qui Christo credit, non diligit infimum, non superbit in medio atque ita summo inhaerere fit idoneus. et hoc est totum, quod agere iubemur, monemur, accendimur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since I know you, receive this thing, great and brief. There is a nature changeable in place and time, such as body; there is a nature changeable in no way in place, but only in time, such as soul; and there is a nature that can be changed neither in place nor in time: this is God. What I have here suggested to be changeable in any way is called creature; what is unchangeable, Creator. Now since we say that everything we say exists, exists insofar as it abides and insofar as it is one, and since the form of all beauty is unity, you surely see in this division of natures what exists supremely, what exists lowest and yet exists, and what exists in the middle, greater than the lowest and less than the highest. That highest is happiness itself; the lowest can be neither happy nor miserable; but the middle lives miserably by inclining to the lowest, and happily by turning to the highest. Whoever believes in Christ does not love the lowest, is not proud in the middle, and so becomes fit to cling to the highest. And this is the whole of what we are commanded, admonished, and kindled to do.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 18.2 (CSEL 34.1:45–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-18-2).

## Letter 19.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-19-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:46–47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Gaius, a seeker not yet a Catholic, his writings, telling him that whatever is true in them is God's gift and whatever is false is Augustine's own.

### Latin text

Ut abs te abscessimus, dici non potest, quanta suauitate nos perfuderit recordatio tui ac saepe perfundat. recolimus enim ardore inquisitionis tuae, cum esset mirabilis, non fuisse perturbatam modestiam disputandi. nam neque flagrantius percontantem neque tranquillius audientem quemquam facile inuenerim. uellem itaque tecum multum loqui; non enim multum esset, quantumcumque esset, si tecum loquerer. sed quia difficile est, quid opus est causas quaerere? prorsus difficile est. erit fortasse aliquando facillimum ita deus uelit —, nunc certe aliud est. dedi ergo negotium fratri, per quem litteras misi, ut omnia nostra legenda praebeat prudentissimae caritati tuae. non enim aliquid meum inculcabit inuito; noui enim quid benignitatis in nos animo geras. quae tamen lecta si probaueris et uera peruideris, nostra esse non putes, nisi quod data sunt, eoque te conuertas licet, unde tibi quoque est, ut ea probares, datum. nemo enim, quod legit, in codice ipso cernit uerum esse aut in eo, qui scripserit, sed in se potius, si eius menti quoddam non uulgariter candidum et a faece corporis remotissimum lumen ueritatis inpressum est. quod si aliqua falsa atque inprobanda compereris, de humano nubilo inrorata scias et ea uere nostra esse deputes. hortarer autem te ad quaerendum, nisi uidere mihi uiderer hiantia quaedam ora cordis tui; hortarer etiam, ut, quod uerum cognoueris, uiriliter teneas, nisi prae te ferres euidentissimum robur animi et consilii tui. totum enim se mihi breui tempore prope discussis corporis tegumentis, quod in te uiuit, aperuit. neque ullo modo siuerit domini nostri misericordissima prouidentia, ut a catholico Christi grege tu uir tam bonus et egregie cordatus alienus sis.

### English translation (Claude)

Since we parted from you, words cannot say how much sweetness the memory of you has poured over us and often pours over us still. For we recall that, though the ardour of your inquiry was wonderful, the modesty of your discussion was not disturbed by it. For I could not easily find anyone who questions more fervently or listens more calmly. So I would like to talk with you a great deal; for it would not be a great deal, however much it was, if I were talking with you. But since it is difficult, what need is there to look for the reasons? It is simply difficult. Perhaps it will some day be very easy (may God so will), but now it is certainly otherwise. So I have charged the brother by whom I sent this letter to offer all our writings to your most prudent love for reading. For he will press nothing of mine on you against your will; for I know what kindness you bear toward us in your heart. Yet if you read them and approve them and see them to be true, do not think them ours except in that they were given to us; and you may turn to the source from which it was given to you too to approve them. For no one sees that what he reads is true in the book itself or in the one who wrote it, but rather in himself, if a light of truth, uncommonly bright and very far removed from the dregs of the body, has been impressed on his mind. But if you find some things false and to be rejected, know that they have been sprinkled from a human cloud, and consider them truly ours. I would exhort you to seek, did I not seem to see the open mouths, as it were, of your heart; I would also exhort you to hold manfully what you have known to be true, did you not display the most evident strength of your mind and counsel. For in a short time, with the coverings of the body almost shaken off, what lives in you disclosed itself wholly to me. And may the most merciful providence of our Lord in no way allow that you, so good and so remarkably wise a man, should remain a stranger to the Catholic flock of Christ.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Gaius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 19.1 (CSEL 34.1:46–47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-19-1).

## Letter 20.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Antoninus, a layman, by the hand of a friend who is visiting him, and thanks him for his letter.

### Latin text

Cum a duobus tibi scripta deberentur, cumulatissime magis pars reddita est, quod unum nostrum praesentem uides, cuius ex ore cum me quoque accipis, poteram non rescribere, nisi ipso iubente fecissem, quo proficiscente superuacaneum uidebatur esse, quod feci. quapropter fertilius tecum fortasse conloquor, quam si coram adessem, cum et epistulam meam legis et eum audis, in cuius pectore me habitare optime nosti. cum magno gaudio litteras sanctitatis tuae consideraui atque digessi, quod et christianum animum tuum sine ullo fuco iniqui temporis et in nos amicissimum prae se gerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Since letters were owed to you by two of us, a larger part of the debt has been paid most abundantly in that you see one of us present; and since you receive me too from his mouth, I could have not written back, had I not done so at his own bidding, although, since he was setting out to you, what I have done seemed superfluous. So perhaps I talk with you more fruitfully than if I were present in person, since you both read my letter and hear him in whose heart you know very well that I dwell. With great joy I considered and digested the letter of Your Holiness, because it displays both your Christian mind, free of any of the pretence of this wicked time, and your great friendship toward us.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Antoninus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 20.1 (CSEL 34.1:47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-1).

## Letter 20.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:47–48
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Antoninus that his love for goodness in others profits him even if they fall short, and asks for his prayers.

### Latin text

Gratulor tibi et gratias ago deo et domino nostro de spe et fide et caritate tua tibique apud eum, quod de nobis tam bene existimas, ut fideles dei seruos esse credas idque ipsum in nobis corde purissimo diligas. quamquam hinc etiam gratulandum beniuolentiae tuae potius quam gratiae agendae sint. tibi enim prodest ipsam diligere bonitatem, quam profecto diligit, qui eum diligit, quem credit bonum, siue ille se ita siue aliter, quam creditur, habeat. unus tantum in hac re cauendus error est, ne quisquam non de homine, sed de ipso hominis bono aliter sentiat, quam ueritas postulat. tu uero, frater dilectissime, qui nullo modo erras credendo uel sciendo magnum bonum esse libenter deo casteque seruire, quemlibet hominum propterea diligas, quod huius boni participem credis, tecum est fructus tuus, etiam si ille non ita sit. quapropter tibi de hac re gratulandum est; illi autem non, si propterea diligitur, sed si talis est, qualem esse existimat, a quo propterea diligitur. quales itaque nos simus quantumque in deum promouerimus, ipse uiderit, cuius non solum de hominis bono, sed de homine ipso non potest errare iudicium. tibi ad mercedem beatitudinis, quod ad hanc rem adtinet, satis est, quod nos tales credens, quales esse oportet seruos dei, toto sinu cordis amplecteris. gratias uero tibi uberes agimus, quod nos cum laudas, tamquam tales simus, mirabiliter hortaris, ut tales esse cupiamus; uberiores etiam, si non solum te commendes orationibus nostris, sed etiam pro nobis orare non praetermittas. gratior enim deo est pro fratre deprecatio, ubi sacrificium caritatis offertur.

### English translation (Claude)

I congratulate you and thank our God and Lord for your hope and faith and love, and I congratulate you before him that you think so well of us as to believe us faithful servants of God, and love that very thing in us with a most pure heart. Though in this matter your goodwill is to be congratulated rather than thanked. For it profits you to love goodness itself, which he certainly loves who loves someone he believes to be good, whether that person is so or otherwise than he is believed to be. In this matter only one error must be guarded against: that no one should think otherwise than truth requires, not about the man, but about the very good of a man. But you, most beloved brother, who in no way err in believing or knowing that it is a great good to serve God willingly and chastely, when you love any person because you believe him to share in this good, have your fruit with you, even if he is not so. Therefore you are to be congratulated on this; but he is not, if he is loved for that reason, but only if he is such as the one who loves him for that reason thinks him to be. So what we are and how far we have advanced toward God, he will see whose judgment cannot err, not only about the good of a man but about the man himself. For your reward of happiness, as far as this matter goes, it is enough that, believing us to be such as servants of God ought to be, you embrace us with the whole bosom of your heart. And we give you abundant thanks that, while you praise us as though we were such, you wonderfully encourage us to desire to be such; and more abundant thanks still if you not only commend yourself to our prayers but also do not fail to pray for us. For prayer for a brother is more pleasing to God when the sacrifice of love is offered.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 20.2 (CSEL 34.1:47–48; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-2).

## Letter 20.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:48–49
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine greets Antoninus's child and urges him to lead his wife, who is outside the Catholic communion, to the Catholic faith by reading and conversation.

### Latin text

Paruulum tuum plurimum saluto et secundum praecepta domini salutaria opto grandescere. domui quoque tuae unam fidem et deuotionem ueram, quae sola catholica est, prouenire desidero et precor. in quam rem si quam forte aliam nostram operam necessariam existimas, ne tibi dubites uindicare et communi domino fretus et iure caritatis. illud sane admonuerim religiosissimam prudentiam tuam, ut timorem dei non inrationabilem uel inseras infirmiori uasi tuo uel nutrias diuina lectione grauique conloquio. nemo enim fere sollicitus de statu animae suae atque ob hoc sine pertinacia inquirendae uoluntatis domini intentus est, qui bono demonstratore usus non dinoscat, quid inter schisma quodlibet atque unam catholicam intersit.

### English translation (Claude)

I greet your little one most warmly and wish him to grow up according to the saving precepts of the Lord. For your house too I desire and pray that there may come the one faith and true devotion, which alone is Catholic. If you think any further help of ours necessary for this, do not hesitate to claim it, relying both on our common Lord and on the right of love. I would certainly advise your most religious prudence to implant or nourish a reasonable fear of God in your weaker vessel by divine reading and serious conversation. For hardly anyone who is anxious about the state of his soul, and therefore intent without obstinacy on seeking the will of the Lord, fails, with the help of a good guide, to discern the difference between any schism and the one Catholic Church.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Weaker vessel' (1 Pet 3:7) means his wife, apparently a member of a schismatic (probably Donatist) church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 20.3 (CSEL 34.1:48–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-20-3).

## Letter 21.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:49–50
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, newly ordained presbyter at Hippo, tells Bishop Valerius that church office is easy if done carelessly but most difficult and blessed if done rightly, and that he was forced into it unprepared.

### Latin text

Ante omnia peto, ut cogitet religiosa prudentia tua nihil esse in hac uita et maxime hoc tempore facilius et laetius et hominibus acceptabilius episcopi aut presbyteri aut diaconi officio, si perfunctorie atque adulatorie res agatur, sed nihil apud deum miserius et tristius et damnabilius; item nihil esse in hac uita et maxime hoc tempore difficilius, laboriosius, periculosius episcopi aut presbyteri aut diaconi officio, sed apud deum nihil beatius, si eo modo militetur, quo noster imperator iubet. quis autem iste sit modus, nec a pueritia nec ab adulescentia mea didici. et eo tempore, quo discere coeperam, uis mihi facta est merito peccatorum meorum — nam quid aliud existimem nescio —, ut secundus locus gubernaculorum mihi traderetur, qui remum tenere non noueram.

### English translation (Claude)

Before all else I ask your religious prudence to consider that there is nothing in this life, and especially at this time, easier, more pleasant, and more acceptable to people than the office of bishop or presbyter or deacon, if the work is done perfunctorily and with flattery; but nothing more wretched, sad, and damnable before God. Likewise, there is nothing in this life, and especially at this time, more difficult, laborious, and dangerous than the office of bishop or presbyter or deacon; but nothing more blessed before God, if one serves as a soldier in the way our Commander orders. But what that way is I did not learn either in boyhood or in youth. And at the very time when I had begun to learn it, force was put on me, as the due of my sins (for I do not know what else to think), so that the second place at the helm was handed to me, who did not know how to hold an oar.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Valerius, bishop of Hippo, shortly after Augustine's forced ordination as presbyter (391).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.1 (CSEL 34.1:49–50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-1).

## Letter 21.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:50–51
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains the tears he shed at his ordination: he had criticized clergy before knowing the difficulty of their work and overestimated his own strength.

### Latin text

Sed arbitror dominum meum propterea me sic emendare uoluisse, quod multorum peccata nautarum, antequam expertus essem, quid illic agitur, quasi doctior et melior reprehendere audebam. itaque posteaquam missus sum in medium, tunc sentire coepi temeritates reprehensionum mearum, quamquam et antea periculosissimum iudicarem hoc ministerium. et hinc erant illae lacrimae, quas me fundere in nouitate ordinationis meae nonnulli fratres animaduerterunt et nescientes causas doloris mei quibus potuerunt sermonibus, qui omnino ad uulnus meum non pertinerent, tamen bono animo consolati sunt. sed multo, ualde multo amplius expertus sum, quam putabam, non quia nouos aliquos fluctus aut tempestates uidi, quas ante non uideram uel non audieram uel non legeram uel non cogitaueram, sed ad eas euitandas aut perferendas sollertiam et uires meas omnino non noueram et alicuius momenti arbitrabar. dominus autem inrisit me et rebus ipsis ostendere uoluit me ipsum mihi.

### English translation (Claude)

But I think my Lord wished to correct me in this way because, before I had experienced what is done there, I dared to criticize the sins of many sailors as though I were more learned and better. So after I was sent into the midst, I began to feel the rashness of my criticisms, although even before I judged this ministry most dangerous. And this was the source of those tears which some brothers noticed me shedding in the newness of my ordination; not knowing the causes of my grief, they consoled me with good intentions by whatever words they could, words which had nothing at all to do with my wound. But I have experienced much, very much more than I thought; not because I saw any new waves or storms which I had not seen or heard of or read of or thought of before, but because I did not know my skill and strength for avoiding or enduring them at all, and thought them of some account. But the Lord laughed at me and wished to show me to myself by the facts themselves.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.2 (CSEL 34.1:50–51; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-2).

## Letter 21.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:51–52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Valerius for leave to study the Scriptures, which he now sees he needs in order to minister the sacrament and the word.

### Latin text

Quod si non damnando, sed miserando fecit — hoc enim spero certe uel nunc cognita aegritudine mea —, debeo scripturarum eius medicamenta omnia perscrutari et orando ac legendo agere, ut idonea ualitudo animae meae ad tam periculosa negotia tribuatur. quod ante non feci, quia et tempus non habui; tunc enim ordinatus sum, cum de ipso uacationis tempore ad cognoscendas diuinas scripturas cogitaremus et sic nos disponere uellemus, ut nobis otium ad hoc negotium posset esse. quod uerum est, nondum sciebam, quid mihi deesset ad tale opus, quale me nunc torquet et conterit. quod si propterea in re ipsa didici, quid sit homini necessarium, qui populo ministrat sacramentum et uerbum dei, ut iam mihi non liceat adsequi, quod me non habere cognoui, iubes ergo, ut peream, pater Ualeri? ubi est caritas tua? certe diligis me? certe diligis ipsam ecclesiam, cui me sic ministrare uoluisti? et tamen certus sum, quod et me et ipsam diligis. sed putas me idoneum, cum ego melius me nouerim, qui tamen nec ipse me nossem, nisi experiendo didicissem.

### English translation (Claude)

But if he did this not to condemn but to have mercy (and this I certainly hope, at least now that my sickness is known), I must search out all the medicines of his Scriptures, and by praying and reading act so that health of soul fit for such dangerous business may be granted me. This I did not do before, because I did not have the time; for I was ordained just when we were thinking about using that very time of leisure to get to know the divine Scriptures, and wanted to arrange our affairs so that we could have leisure for this business. And, to tell the truth, I did not yet know what I lacked for such a work as now torments and crushes me. But if, having learned in the very doing what is necessary for a man who ministers the sacrament and the word of God to the people, I am now not allowed to acquire what I have recognized that I do not have, do you then order me to perish, father Valerius? Where is your love? Surely you love me? Surely you love the church itself, which you wished me to serve in this way? And yet I am sure that you love both me and it. But you think me fit, while I know myself better; and yet I would not know myself either, had I not learned by experience.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.3 (CSEL 34.1:51–52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-3).

## Letter 21.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he knows what is needed for his own salvation but not how to minister it to others, and asks for time until Easter to study the Scriptures.

### Latin text

Sed dicit fortasse sanctitas tua: uellem scire, quid desit instructioni tuae. tam multa autem sunt, ut facilius possim enumerare, quae habeam, quam quae habere desidero. auderem enim dicere scire me et plena fide retinere, quid pertineat ad salutem nostram. sed hoc ipsum quo modo ministrem ad salutem aliorum non quaerens, quod mihi utile est, sed quod multis, ut salui fiant? et sunt fortasse aliqua, immo non est dubitandum esse in sanctis libris conscripta consilia, quibus cognitis et adprehensis possit homo dei rebus ecclesiasticis ordinatioribus ministrare aut certe inter manus iniquorum uel uiuere conscientia saniore uel mori, ut illa uita non amittatur, cui uni christiana corda humilia et mansueta suspirant. quo modo autem hoc fieri potest, nisi, quem ad modum ipse dominus dicit, petendo quaerendo pulsando, id est orando legendo plangendo? ad quod negotium mihi paruum tempus uelut usque ad pascha impetrare uolui per fratres a tua sincerissima et uenerabili caritate et nunc per has preces uolo.

### English translation (Claude)

But perhaps Your Holiness says: 'I would like to know what is lacking in your training.' There are so many things that I could more easily list what I have than what I wish to have. For I would dare to say that I know and hold with full faith what pertains to our salvation. But how am I to minister this very thing for the salvation of others, 'seeking not what is useful to me, but what is useful to many, that they may be saved'? And there are perhaps some counsels (indeed, there is no doubt that there are) written in the holy books, by knowing and grasping which a man of God may minister in church affairs in a more orderly way, or at least live with a sounder conscience among the hands of the wicked, or die so as not to lose that life for which alone humble and meek Christian hearts sigh. But how can this be done except, as the Lord himself says, by asking, seeking, knocking, that is, by praying, reading, lamenting? For this business I wished to obtain from your most sincere and venerable love, through the brothers, a little time, say until Easter, and I wish it now through this request.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 10:33: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of 1 Cor 10:33; allusion to Matt 7:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.4 (CSEL 34.1:52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-4).

## Letter 21.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:52–53
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine imagines Christ the judge asking why he would travel for a year to defend church property but would not take time to learn to tend Christ's field.

### Latin text

Quid enim responsurus sum domino iudici? non poteram ista iam quaerere, cum ecclesiasticis negotiis impedirer? si ergo mihi dicat: serue nequam, si uilla ecclesiae calumniosum aliquem pateretur, cuius fructibus colligendis magna opera inpenditur neglecto agro, quem rigaui sanguine meo, si quid agere pro ea posses apud iudicem terrae, nonne omnibus consentientibus, nonnullis etiam iubentibus et cogentibus pergeres et, si contra te iudicaretur, etiam trans mare proficiscereris? atque hoc modo uel annuam uel amplius absentiam tuam nulla querela reuocaret, ne alius possideret terram non animae sed corpori pauperum necessariam, quorum tamen famem uiuae arbores meae multo facilius mihique gratius, si diligenter colerentur, explerent. cur ergo ad discendam agriculturam meam uacationem temporis tibi defuisse causaris? dic mihi, quid respondeam; rogo te. an forte uis dicam: senex Ualerius dum me omnibus rebus instructum esse credidisset, quanto amplius me dilexit, tanto minus discere ista permisit?

### English translation (Claude)

For what am I to answer the Lord my judge? 'I could not seek these things then, since I was hindered by church business'? If, then, he says to me: 'Wicked servant, if some estate of the church, on the gathering of whose fruits great effort is spent, were suffering from some vexatious claimant, while the field which I watered with my blood lay neglected; if you could do anything for it before an earthly judge, would you not go, with everyone agreeing and some even ordering and compelling you, and, if the judgment went against you, would you not even set out across the sea? And in that case no complaint would call you back from an absence of a year or more, so that another might not possess land needed not for the soul but for the body of the poor, whose hunger my living trees, if carefully cultivated, would satisfy much more easily and more pleasingly to me. Why then do you plead that you lacked the time to learn my husbandry?' Tell me, what am I to answer? I ask you. Or perhaps you want me to say: 'Old Valerius, believing me to be equipped in all things, the more he loved me, the less he allowed me to learn these things'?

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:26: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Wicked servant' recalls Matt 25:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.5 (CSEL 34.1:52–53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-5).

## Letter 21.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:53–54
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begs Valerius by Christ to grant the time he asks and to pray for him.

### Latin text

Adtende omnia ista, senex Ualeri; obsecro te per bonitatem et seueritatem Christi, per misericordiam et iudicium eius, per eum, tantam qui tibi inspirauit erga nos caritatem, ut ne te nec pro lucro animae nostrae audeamus offendere. sic autem mihi dominum et Christum testem facis innocentiae et caritatis et sinceri affectus, quem circa nos habes, quasi ego non de his iurare omnibus possum. ipsam ergo caritatem et affectum inploro, ut miserearis mei et concedas mihi ad hoc, quod rogaui, tempus, quantum rogaui, atque adiuues me orationibus tuis, ut non sit inane desiderium meum nec infructuosa ecclesiae Christi atque utilitati fratrum et conseruorum meorum absentia mea. scio quod illam caritatem pro me orantem maxime in tali causa non despicit dominus et eam sicut sacrificium suauitatis accipiens fortassis breuiore tempore, quam postulaui, me saluberrimis consiliis de scripturis suis reddet instructum.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider all this, old Valerius; I implore you by the goodness and severity of Christ, by his mercy and judgment, by him who inspired in you such love toward us that we do not dare to offend you even for the gain of our soul. You make the Lord and Christ my witness to the innocence and love and sincere affection which you have toward us, as though I myself could not swear to all these things. So I implore that very love and affection: have pity on me and grant me, for the purpose I asked, as much time as I asked, and help me with your prayers, so that my desire may not be vain nor my absence fruitless for the church of Christ and for the benefit of my brothers and fellow servants. I know that the Lord does not despise that love when it prays for me, especially in such a cause, and, receiving it as a sacrifice of sweet savour, will perhaps return me instructed with most wholesome counsels from his Scriptures in a shorter time than I asked.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:22: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Goodness and severity' echoes Rom 11:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 21.6 (CSEL 34.1:53–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/16-1/#p-21-6).

## Letter 22.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:54–55
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, presbyter at Hippo, answers Aurelius, bishop of Carthage, thanking him for his kindness toward Alypius and the community of brothers.

### Latin text

Qua gratia responderem litteris sanctitatis tuae, cum diu haesitans non reperirem — omnia enim uicit affectus animi mei, quem iam sponte surgentem lectio epistulae tuae multo ardentius excitauit —, commisi me tamen deo, qui pro uiribus meis operaretur in me, ut ea rescriberem, quae utrique nostrum studio in domino et cura ecclesiastica pro tua praestantia et mea obsecundatione congruerent. atque illud primum, quod orationibus meis te adiuuari credis, non solum non defugio, uerum etiam libenter amplector. ita enim etsi non meis, at certe tuis me dominus noster exaudiet. quod fratrem Alypium in nostra coniunctione mansisse, ut exemplo sit fratribus curas mundi huius uitare cupientibus, beniuolentissime accepisti, ago gratias, quas nullis uerbis explicare possim; deus hoc rependat in animam tuam. omnis itaque fratrum coetus, qui apud eos coepit coalescere, tanta tibi praerogatiua obstrictus est, ut locis terrarum tantum longe disiunctis ita nobis consulueris tamquam praesentissimus spiritu. quapropter precibus, quantum ualemus, incumbimus, ut gregem tibi commissum tecum dominus sustinere dignetur nec te uspiam deserere, sed adesse adiutor in opportunitatibus faciens cum ecclesia sua misericordiam per sacerdotium tuum, qualem spiritales uiri ut faciat lacrimis eum gemitibusque interpellant.

### English translation (Claude)

When after long hesitation I could not find how to answer the letter of Your Holiness (for the affection of my heart overcame everything, and the reading of your letter stirred it up much more ardently when it was already rising of its own accord), I nevertheless committed myself to God, that he might work in me according to my strength, so that I might write back what would befit the zeal of both of us in the Lord and our care for the church, in keeping with your eminence and my deference. And first, that you believe you are helped by my prayers, I not only do not shrink from but gladly embrace. For so, if not through mine, then certainly through yours, our Lord will hear me. For your most kindly reception of the news that brother Alypius has remained in our fellowship, to be an example to brothers who wish to avoid the cares of this world, I thank you with thanks I could express in no words; may God repay this to your soul. So the whole company of brothers that has begun to grow together here is bound to you by so great a privilege, in that, though separated from us by so great a distance of lands, you have consulted for us as if present in spirit. Therefore we apply ourselves to prayer as much as we can, that the Lord may deign to uphold with you the flock entrusted to you, and not forsake you anywhere, but be present as a helper in times of need, showing mercy to his church through your priesthood, such mercy as spiritual men implore him with tears and groans to show.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Aurelius, bishop of Carthage. 'Priesthood' (sacerdotium) here means the episcopate.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.1 (CSEL 34.1:54–55; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-1).

## Letter 22.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:55–56
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine hopes that Aurelius and church councils can correct the disorders of the African church, especially drunkenness and strife, which are tolerated while sexual sin is punished.

### Latin text

Scias itaque, domine beatissime et plenissima caritate uenerabilis, non desperare nos, immo sperare nos uehementer, quod dominus et deus noster per auctoritatem personae, quam geris, quam non carni, sed spiritu tuo inpositam esse confidimus, multas carnales foeditates et aegritudines, quas Africana ecclesia in multis patitur, in paucis gemit................ conciliorum graui ense et tua grauitate posse sanari. cum enim apostolus tria breuiter genera uitiorum detestanda et uitanda uno in loco posuerit, de quibus innumerabilium peccatorum exurrexit seges, unum horum, quod quidem secundo loco posuit, acerrime in ecclesia uindicatur; duo autem reliqua, id est primum et ultimum, tolerabilia uidentur hominibus atque ita paulatim fieri potest, ut nec uitia iam putentur. ait enim uas electionis: Non in comissationibus et ebrietatibus, non in cubilibus et inpudicitiis, non in contentione et zelo; sed induite uos dominum Iesum Christum et carnis curam ne feceritis in concupiscentiis.

### English translation (Claude)

Know, then, most blessed lord, venerable in your fullest love, that we do not despair, indeed we strongly hope, that our Lord and God, through the authority of the office you bear, which we trust has been laid not on your flesh but on your spirit, can heal by the weighty sword of councils and by your own weight of authority the many carnal foulnesses and sicknesses which the African church suffers in many members and laments in few. For the apostle in one place briefly set down three kinds of vices to be detested and avoided, from which a harvest of innumerable sins has sprung up; one of these, the one he put in second place, is punished most severely in the church, but the other two, that is, the first and the last, seem tolerable to people, and so it can gradually come about that they are no longer even thought vices. For the vessel of election says: 'Not in revelling and drunkenness, not in beds and impurity, not in strife and jealousy; but put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh in its desires.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:13–14: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 9:15: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Rom 13:13–14; 'vessel of election' is Paul (Acts 9:15). The second vice (sexual sin) is punished by the church; the first (revelling and drunkenness) and the third (strife and jealousy) are tolerated. A row of dots in the digital text after 'gemit' is passed over; the sense is complete.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.2 (CSEL 34.1:55–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-2).

## Letter 22.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:56–57
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine complains that drunken feasts are tolerated, even held daily at the martyrs' shrines, while sexual sin is rightly punished by exclusion from communion.

### Latin text

Horum ergo trium cubilia et inpudicitiae ita magnum crimen putatur, ut nemo dignus non modo ecclesiastico ministerio, sed ipsa etiam sacramentorum communione uideatur, qui se isto peccato maculauerit. et recte omnino. sed quare solum? comissationes enim et ebrietates ita concessae et licitae putantur, ut in honore etiam beatissimorum martyrum non solum per dies sollemnes, quod ipsum quis non lugendum uideat, qui haec non carneis oculis inspicit, sed etiam cotidie celebrentur. quam foeditatem, si tantum flagitiosa et non etiam sacrilega esset, quibuscumque tolerantiae uiribus sustentandam putaremus. quamquam ubi est illud, quod cum multa uitia enumerasset idem apostolus, inter quae posuit ebriosos, ita conclusit, ut diceret: cum talibus nec panem edere? sed feramus haec in luxu et labe domestica et eorum conuiuiorum, quae priuatis parietibus continentur, accipiamusque cum eis corpus Christi, cum quibus panem edere prohibemur: saltem de sanctorum corporum sepulcris, saltem de locis sacramentorum, de domibus orationum tantum dedecus arceatur. quis enim audet uetare priuatim, quod cum frequentatur in sanctis locis, honor martyrum nominatur?

### English translation (Claude)

Of these three, then, debauchery and impurity is thought so great a crime that no one who has stained himself with that sin seems worthy not only of church ministry but even of communion in the sacraments themselves. And quite rightly. But why that alone? For revelling and drunkenness are thought so allowed and lawful that they are celebrated even in honour of the most blessed martyrs, not only on the solemn days (which in itself anyone who looks at these things with eyes not of flesh must see as lamentable), but even daily. If this foulness were only shameful and not also sacrilegious, we would think it should be borne with whatever strength of tolerance we have. And yet what of that saying of the same apostle, when, having listed many vices, among which he put drunkards, he concluded by saying that we should not even eat bread with such people? But let us bear these things in domestic luxury and corruption, and in those banquets that are held within private walls, and let us receive the body of Christ with those with whom we are forbidden to eat bread; at least from the tombs of the saints' bodies, at least from the places of the sacraments, from the houses of prayer, let so great a disgrace be kept away. For who dares to forbid in private what, when it is practised by crowds in holy places, is called honouring the martyrs?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 5:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The apostle's saying is 1 Cor 5:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.3 (CSEL 34.1:56–57; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-3).

## Letter 22.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:57–58
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Aurelius to abolish the feasts, as most churches overseas have done, by the authority of a council or by the example of Carthage.

### Latin text

Haec si prima Africa temptaret auferre, a ceteris terris imitatione digna esse deberet; cum uero et per Italiae maximam partem et in aliis omnibus aut prope omnibus transmarinis ecclesiis, partim quia numquam facta sunt, partim quia uel orta uel inueterata sanctorum et uere de uita futura cogitantium episcoporum diligentia et animaduersione extincta atque deleta sunt,................ dubitare quo modo possumus tantam morum labem uel proposito tam lato exemplo emendare? et nos quidem illarum partium hominem habemus episcopum, unde magnas deo agimus gratias. quamquam eius modestiae atque lenitatis est, eius denique prudentiae et sollicitudinis in domino, ut, etiam si Afer esset, cito illi de scripturis persuaderetur curandum, quod licentiosa et male libera consuetudo uulnus inflixit, sed tanta pestilentia est huius mali, ut sanari prorsus, quantum mihi uidetur, nisi concilii auctoritate non possit, aut, si ab una ecclesia inchoanda est medicina, sicut uidetur audaciae mutare conari, quod Carthaginiensis ecclesia tenet, sic magnae inpudentiae est uelle seruare, quod Carthaginiensis ecclesia correxit. ad hanc autem rem quis alius episcopus esset optandus, nisi qui ea diaconus execrabatur?

### English translation (Claude)

If Africa were the first to try to remove these things, it would deserve to be imitated by the other lands; but since, throughout the greater part of Italy and in all or nearly all the other churches overseas, these things have either never been done, or, where they arose or had become long established, have been extinguished and abolished by the diligence and correction of bishops who were holy and truly thinking about the life to come, how can we hesitate to correct so great a corruption of morals, with so wide an example set before us? And we indeed have as our bishop a man from those parts, for which we give great thanks to God. He is, moreover, of such moderation and gentleness, and finally of such prudence and solicitude in the Lord, that even if he were an African he would quickly be persuaded from the Scriptures that the wound which a licentious and wrongly free custom has inflicted must be healed. But the plague of this evil is so great that, as it seems to me, it can be fully healed only by the authority of a council; or, if the medicine must begin with one church, then, just as it seems audacious to try to change what the church of Carthage holds, so it is great impudence to wish to keep what the church of Carthage has corrected. And for this purpose what other bishop could be wished for than one who denounced these things as a deacon?

### Translation notes

- The bishop 'from those parts' is Valerius of Hippo, a Greek from overseas. A row of dots in the digital text after 'deleta sunt' is passed over; the sense is complete.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.4 (CSEL 34.1:57–58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-4).

## Letter 22.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:58
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine advises that the custom be removed gently, by teaching and admonition rather than threats, since a multitude must be persuaded.

### Latin text

Sed quod erat tunc dolendum, nunc auferendum est non aspere, sed, sicut scriptum est, in spiritu lenitatis et mansuetudinis. dant enim mihi fiduciam litterae tuae, indices germanissimae caritatis, ut tecum tamquam mecum audeam conloqui. non ergo aspere, quantum existimo, non duriter, non modo imperioso ista tolluntur, magis docendo quam iubendo, magis monendo quam minando. sic enim agendum est cum multitudine, seueritas autem exercenda est in peccata paucorum. et si quid minamur, cum dolore fiat de scripturis comminando uindictam futuram, ne nos ipsi in nostra potestate, sed deus in nostro sermone timeatur. ita prius mouebuntur spiritales uel spiritalibus proximi, quorum auctoritate et lenissimis quidem sed instantissimis admonitionibus cetera multitudo frangatur.

### English translation (Claude)

But what was then to be lamented must now be removed, not harshly, but, as it is written, in a spirit of gentleness and meekness. For your letter, a sign of most genuine love, gives me confidence to dare to speak with you as with myself. These things are not removed, then, as I think, harshly, not severely, not in an imperious way, but more by teaching than by commanding, more by admonishing than by threatening. For so one must deal with a multitude; severity is to be exercised on the sins of a few. And if we threaten at all, let it be done with sorrow, threatening future punishment from the Scriptures, so that it is not we ourselves in our own power, but God in our words, who is feared. In this way the spiritual, or those close to the spiritual, will be moved first, so that by their authority and by gentle but most insistent admonitions the rest of the multitude may be won over.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'In a spirit of gentleness' recalls Gal 6:1 (compare 1 Cor 4:21).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.5 (CSEL 34.1:58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-5).

## Letter 22.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:58–59
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that the feasts at the tombs be replaced by modest offerings for the dead given freely to all, with money given to the poor.

### Latin text

Sed quoniam istae in cimiteriis ebrietates et luxuriosa conuiuia non solum honores martyrum a carnali et inperita plebe credi solent, sed etiam solatia mortuorum, mihi uidetur facilius illis dissuaderi posse istam foeditatem ac turpitudinem, si et de scripturis prohibeatur et oblationes pro spiritibus dormientium, quas uere aliquid adiuuare credendum est, super ipsas memorias non sint sumptuosae atque omnibus petentibus sine typho et cum alacritate praebeantur neque uendantur; sed si quis pro religione aliquid pecuniae offerre uoluerit, in praesenti pauperibus eroget. ita nec deserere uidebuntur memorias suorum, quod potest gignere non leuem cordis dolorem, et id celebrabitur in ecclesia, quod pie honesteque celebratur. haec interim de comissationibus et ebrietatibus dicta sint.

### English translation (Claude)

But since these drunken feasts and luxurious banquets in the cemeteries are usually believed by the carnal and ignorant people to be not only honours to the martyrs but also comforts for the dead, it seems to me that this foulness and disgrace could more easily be dissuaded from them if it is forbidden from the Scriptures, and if the offerings for the spirits of those who sleep, which we must truly believe are of some help, are not sumptuous over the memorials themselves, and are given to all who ask without pride and with readiness, and are not sold; but if anyone wishes to offer some money out of religious devotion, let him pay it out to the poor on the spot. In this way they will not seem to desert the memorials of their own dead, which can cause no slight grief of heart, and what is celebrated in the church will be celebrated piously and honourably. Let this suffice for now about revelling and drunkenness.

### Translation notes

- Augustine holds that offerings for the dead are of some help to them; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.6 (CSEL 34.1:58–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-6).

## Letter 22.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-7
- Source: CSEL 34.1:59–60
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says strife and jealousy, born of pride and love of praise, are worse among the clergy, and that a cleric should accept honour only for the good of others.

### Latin text

De contentione autem et zelo quid me attinet dicere, quando ista uitia non in plebe, sed in nostro numero grauiora sunt? horum autem morborum mater superbia est et humanae laudis auiditas, quae etiam hypocrisin saepe generat. huic non resistitur, nisi crebris diuinorum librorum testimoniis incutiatur timor et caritas dei, si tamen ille, qui hoc agit, se ipsum praebeat patientiae atque humilitatis exemplum minus sibi adsumendo, quam offertur, sed tamen ab eis, qui se honorant, nec totum nec nihil accipiendo et id, quod accipitur laudis aut honoris, non propter se, qui totus coram deo esse debet et humana contemnere, sed propter illos accipiatur, quibus consulere non potest, si nimia deiectione uilescat. ad hoc enim pertinet, quod dictum est: Nemo iuuentutem tuam contemnat, cum ille hoc dixerit, qui alio loco ait: Si hominibus placere uellem, Christi seruus non essem.

### English translation (Claude)

But as for strife and jealousy, what business is it of mine to speak of them, when these vices are more serious not among the people but in our own number? The mother of these diseases is pride and greed for human praise, which also often begets hypocrisy. This is not resisted unless the fear and love of God are struck into the heart by frequent testimonies of the divine books; provided, however, that the one who does this offers himself as an example of patience and humility, taking for himself less than is offered, yet accepting from those who honour him neither all nor nothing; and whatever praise or honour is accepted should be accepted not for his own sake, since he ought to be wholly in the sight of God and to despise human things, but for the sake of those whose good he cannot serve if he becomes worthless through excessive self-abasement. For this is what is meant by the saying, 'Let no one despise your youth', since he said it who says in another place: 'If I wished to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.'

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Tim 4:12 and Gal 1:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.7 (CSEL 34.1:59–60; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-7).

## Letter 22.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-8
- Source: CSEL 34.1:60–61
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reflects on the difficulty of not delighting in praise, confessing that he himself is often wounded in this struggle.

### Latin text

Magnum est de honoribus et laudibus hominum non laetari, sed et omnem inanem pompam praecidere et, si quid inde necessarium retinetur, id totum ad utilitatem honorantium salutemque conferre. non enim frustra dictum est: Deus confringet ossa hominibus placere uolentium. quid enim languidius, quid tam sine stabilitate ac fortitudine, quod ossa significant, quam homo, quem male loquentium lingua debilitat, cum sciat falsa esse, quae dicuntur? cuius rei dolor nullo modo animae uiscera dilaniaret, si non amor laudis eius ossa confringeret. praesumo de robore animi tui; itaque ista, quae tecum confero, mihi dico; dignaris tamen, credo, mecum considerare, quam sint grauia, quam difficilia. non enim huius hostis uires sentit, nisi qui ei bellum indixerit, quia, etsi cuiquam facile est laude carere, dum denegatur, difficile est ea non delectari, cum offertur. et tamen tanta mentis in deum debet esse suspensio, ut, si non merito laudemur, corrigamus eos, quos possumus, ne arbitrentur aut in nobis esse, quod non est, aut nostrum esse, quod dei est, aut ea laudent, quae quamuis non desint nobis aut etiam supersint, nequaquam tamen sint laudabilia, uelut sunt bona omnia, quae uel cum pecoribus habemus communia uel cum impiis hominibus. si autem merito laudamur propter deum, gratulemur eis, quibus placet uerum bonum, non tamen nobis, quia placemus hominibus, sed si coram deo tales sumus, quales esse nos credunt, et non tribuitur nobis sed deo, cuius dona sunt omnia, quae uere meritoque laudantur. haec mihi ipse canto cotidie uel potius ille, cuius salutaria praecepta sunt, quaecumque siue in diuinis lectionibus inueniuntur siue quae intrinsecus animo suggeruntur. et tamen uehementer cum aduersario dimicans saepe ab eo uulnera accipio, cum delectationem oblatae laudis mihi auferre non possum.

### English translation (Claude)

It is a great thing not to rejoice in human honours and praises, but also to cut off all empty pomp, and, if anything of it is kept as necessary, to devote all of it to the benefit and salvation of those who honour us. For not in vain was it said: 'God will break the bones of those who wish to please men.' For what is feebler, what so lacking in stability and strength, which bones signify, than a man whom the tongue of slanderers weakens, though he knows that what is said is false? The pain of this would in no way tear the inner parts of the soul if the love of praise did not break its bones. I take the strength of your mind for granted; so the things I share with you I am saying to myself. Yet you deign, I believe, to consider with me how serious, how difficult they are. For no one feels the strength of this enemy except one who has declared war on it, because, though it is easy for anyone to do without praise while it is denied, it is difficult not to be delighted by it when it is offered. And yet the mind should be so lifted up to God that, if we are praised undeservedly, we correct those we can, so that they may not think either that there is in us what is not, or that what is God's is ours, or praise things which, though we are not lacking in them or even have them in abundance, are nevertheless in no way praiseworthy, such as all the goods we have in common either with cattle or with impious people. But if we are deservedly praised on account of God, let us congratulate those who are pleased by the true good, yet not ourselves because we please men, but only if before God we are such as they believe us to be, and if the praise is attributed not to us but to God, whose gifts are all the things that are truly and deservedly praised. These things I sing to myself daily, or rather he whose saving precepts they are, whether they are found in the divine readings or suggested inwardly to the mind. And yet, fighting hard with the adversary, I often receive wounds from him, when I cannot take away from myself the delight of praise that is offered.

### Scripture references

- Ps 53:5 (52:6 LXX): quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The saying is Ps 53:5 in the Latin (Old Latin/LXX) form, 'God has scattered the bones of those who please men'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.8 (CSEL 34.1:60–61; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-8).

## Letter 22.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-9
- Source: CSEL 34.1:61–63
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Aurelius to pray for him, to send the aged Saturninus to visit, and thanks him for the land given to the brothers.

### Latin text

Haec propterea scripsi, ut, si tuae sanctitati iam non sunt necessaria, siue quod plura ipse huius modi cogites atque utiliora siue quod tuae sanctitati medicina ista non opus sit, mala tamen mea nota sint tibi sciasque, unde pro mea infirmitate deum rogare digneris. quod ut inpensissime facias, obsecro per humanitatem illius, qui praeceptum dedit, ut inuicem onera nostra portemus. multa sunt, quae de nostra uita et conuersatione deflerem, quae nollem per litteras ad te uenire, sed inter cor meum et cor tuum nulla essent ministeria praeter os meum et aures tuas. si autem uenerabilis nobis omniumque nostrum tota sinceritate carissimus, cuius in te uere fraternam, cum praesens essem, benignitatem studiumque perspexi, senex Saturninus si dignatus fuerit, quando opportunum uidebit, ad nos uenire, quicquid cum eius sanctitate et spiritali affectu conloqui potuerimus, aut nihil aut non multum distabit, ac si cum tua dignatione id ageremus. quod ut nobiscum ab eo petere atque impetrare digneris, tantis precibus posco, quantis uerba nulla sufficiunt. absentiam enim meam tantum longe Hipponienses uehementer nimisque formidant neque ullo modo mihi sic uolunt credere ut et ego uobis. Agrum fratribus datum prouisione et liberalitate tua didicimus ante epistulam tuam per sanctum fratrem et conseruum nostrum Parthenium, a quo multa alia, quae audire desiderabamus, audiuimus. praestabit dominus, ut etiam cetera, quae adhuc desideramus, impleantur.

### English translation (Claude)

I have written these things so that, if they are no longer necessary for Your Holiness, either because you yourself think of more and more useful things of this kind or because Your Holiness has no need of this medicine, my ills at least may be known to you, and you may know what to ask God for on behalf of my weakness. That you may do this most earnestly, I implore you by the humanity of him who gave the command that we bear one another's burdens. There are many things in our life and conduct which I would lament, things I would not want to reach you by letter; between my heart and your heart I would want no intermediaries but my mouth and your ears. But if the aged Saturninus, venerable to us and dearest to all of us in complete sincerity, whose truly brotherly kindness and zeal toward you I saw when I was with you, deigns to come to us when he sees fit, whatever we can discuss with his holiness and spiritual affection will differ little or not at all from doing it with Your Worthiness. I beg you with entreaties for which no words suffice to deign to ask and obtain this from him together with us. For the people of Hippo greatly, too greatly, dread my absence so far away, and will in no way trust me as I trust you. We learned of the field given to the brothers by your provision and generosity before your letter came, through our holy brother and fellow servant Parthenius, from whom we heard many other things we wanted to hear. The Lord will grant that the rest of what we still desire may also be fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Gal 6:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 22.9 (CSEL 34.1:61–63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-22-9).

## Letter 23.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:63–64
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, writing to the Donatist bishop Maximinus, explains why he addresses him as lord, most beloved, honourable and brother, though not as his bishop.

### Latin text

Priusquam ad rem ueniam, de qua tuae beniuolentiae scribere uolui, tituli huius epistulae, ne uel te uel alium quempiam moueat, rationem breuiter reddam. domino scripsi, quia scriptum est: Uos in libertatem uocati estis, fratres; tantum ne libertatem in occasionem carnis detis, sed per caritatem seruite inuicem. cum ergo uel hoc ipso officio litterarum per caritatem tibi seruiam, non absurde te dominum uoco propter unum et uerum dominum nostrum, qui nobis ista praecepit. dilectissimo autem quod scripsi, nouit deus, quod non solum te diligam, sed ita diligam ut me ipsum, quando quidem bene mihi sum conscius et bona me tibi optare quae mihi. honorabili uero quod addidi, non ad hoc addidi, ut honorarem episcopatum tuum; mihi enim episcopus non es. neque hoc cum contumelia dictum acceperis, sed ex animo, quo in ore nostro esse debet est est, non non. neque enim ignoras aut quisquam hominum, qui nos nouit, ignorat neque te esse episcopum meum neque me presbyterum tuum. honorabilem igitur ex ea regula te libenter appello, qua noui te esse hominem et noui hominem ad imaginem dei et similitudinem factum et in honore positum ipso ordine et iure naturae, si tamen intellegendo, quae intellegenda sunt, seruet honorem suum. nam ita scriptum est: Homo in honore positus non intellexit; comparatus est iumentis insensatis et similis factus est illis. cur ergo te honorabilem, in quantum homo es, non appellem, cum praesertim de tua salute atque correctione, quam diu in hac uita es, desperare non audeam? (fratrem) uero ut uocem, non te latet praeceptum nobis esse diuinitus, ut etiam eis, qui negant se fratres nostros esse, dicamus: Fratres nostri estis et hoc uehementer ualet ad causam, propter quam scribere uolui fraternitati tuae. iam enim reddita ratione, cur epistulae talem ianuam fecerim, audi placidissime, quae sequuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Before I come to the matter about which I wished to write to Your Benevolence, I will briefly give the reason for the heading of this letter, so that it may not disturb either you or anyone else. I wrote 'lord' because it is written: 'You were called to freedom, brothers; only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love be servants of one another.' Since, then, even by this very duty of writing I serve you through love, I do not absurdly call you lord, for the sake of our one and true Lord, who gave us these commands. As for my writing 'most beloved', God knows that I not only love you but love you as myself, since I am well aware that I wish for you the same good things as for myself. As for my adding 'honourable', I did not add it to honour your episcopate; for you are not my bishop. And do not take this as said in insult, but from the mind by which there should be in our mouth 'yes, yes; no, no'. For you know, as does anyone who knows us, that neither are you my bishop nor am I your presbyter. I gladly call you honourable, then, by the rule by which I know you to be a man, and know that man was made in the image and likeness of God and set in honour by the very order and law of nature, if only, by understanding what is to be understood, he keeps his honour. For thus it is written: 'Man, set in honour, did not understand; he was compared to senseless beasts and became like them.' Why then should I not call you honourable insofar as you are a man, especially since I dare not despair of your salvation and correction as long as you are in this life? As for calling you brother, you are aware that we have been commanded by God to say even to those who deny that they are our brothers: 'You are our brothers.' And this has great force for the cause on account of which I wished to write to Your Brotherhood. Now that I have given the reason why I made such a doorway to my letter, hear very calmly what follows.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:37: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:26: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 49:12 (48:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 66:5: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Maximinus, Donatist bishop of Sinitum (the heading, explained here, is not printed in the digital text). Quotations: Gal 5:13; Ps 49:12 (Latin form, LXX 48:13); 'You are our brothers' from Isa 66:5 (LXX). 'Brother' is supplied by the editor in round brackets.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.1 (CSEL 34.1:63–64; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-1).

## Letter 23.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:64–66
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Maximinus that he heard he did not rebaptize Catholics, but now hears that he has rebaptized a Catholic deacon of Mutugenna, which he hopes is untrue.

### Latin text

Ego cum in ista regione consuetudinem hominum lugendam + atque plangendam, qui cum christiano nomine glorientur, Christianos rebaptizare non dubitant, quibus uerbis poteram, detestarer, non defuerunt laudatores tui, qui mihi dicerent te ista non facere. fateor, primo non credidi. deinde considerans posse fieri, ut animam humanam de futura uita cogitantem dei timor inuaderet, ut se ab scelere apertissimo temperaret, gratulatus credidi, quod tali proposito ab ecclesia catholica nolueris esse nimis alienus. quaerebam sane occasionem loquendi tecum, ut, si fieri posset, ea quae parua remanserat inter nos dissensio tolleretur, cum ecce ante paucos dies diaconum nostrum Mutugennensem te rebaptizasse nuntiatum est. dolui uehementer et illius miserabilem lapsum et tuum, frater, inopinatum scelus. noui etenim, quae sit ecclesia catholica. gentes sunt hereditas Christi et possessio Christi termini terrae. nostis et uos aut, si non nostis, aduertite; facillime a uolentibus sciri potest. rebaptizare igitur haereticum hominem, qui haec sanctitatis signa perceperit, quae christiana tradidit disciplina, omnino peccatum est; rebaptizare autem catholicum immanissimum scelus est. tamen non adeo credens, quia de te mihi bene persuasum tenebam, Mutugennam ipse perrexi et eum quidem miserum uidere non potui, a parentibus uero eius audiui, quod uester iam etiam diaconus factus sit. et tamen tam bene adhuc de tuo corde sentio, ut eum rebaptizatum esse non credam.

### English translation (Claude)

When in your region I was denouncing, with what words I could, the custom, to be mourned and lamented, of people who, though they glory in the Christian name, do not hesitate to rebaptize Christians, there were some who praised you and told me that you do not do this. I confess that at first I did not believe it. Then, considering that it could happen that the fear of God might come upon a human soul thinking about the future life, so that it would restrain itself from a most manifest crime, I believed it gladly, because by such a resolve you had chosen not to be too far estranged from the Catholic Church. I was indeed seeking an opportunity to speak with you, so that, if possible, the small disagreement that remained between us might be removed, when, behold, a few days ago it was reported that you had rebaptized our deacon of Mutugenna. I grieved greatly both at his wretched fall and at your unexpected crime, brother. For I know what the Catholic Church is. The nations are the inheritance of Christ, and the ends of the earth the possession of Christ. You also know this, or, if you do not, take note; it can be known very easily by those who wish. To rebaptize a heretic, then, who has received these signs of holiness which the Christian discipline has handed down, is altogether a sin; but to rebaptize a Catholic is a most monstrous crime. Still, not quite believing it, because I held a good opinion of you, I went to Mutugenna myself, and though I could not see the wretched man himself, I heard from his parents that he has now even been made your deacon. And yet I still think so well of your heart that I do not believe he has been rebaptized.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ps 2:8. Augustine's position that baptism given outside the Catholic Church is not to be repeated is stated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.2 (CSEL 34.1:64–66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-2).

## Letter 23.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:66–67
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Maximinus to reply openly, to be read in church, and urges him, if he does not rebaptize, to say so freely without fear of his colleagues.

### Latin text

Quare te, frater dilectissime, per diuinitatem et humanitatem domini nostri Iesu Christi obsecro, ut rescribere mihi digneris, quid gestum sit, et sic rescribere, ut noueris me in ecclesia fratribus nostris epistulam tuam uelle recitare. quod ideo scripsi, ne, cum id postea facerem, quod me non sperares esse facturum, offenderem caritatem et iustam de me apud communes amicos querelam deponeres. quid ergo te impediat ad rescribendum, non uideo. si enim rebaptizas, nihil est quod homines de tuo collegio formides, cum id te rescripseris facere, quod te illi facere, etiam si nolles, iuberent. cum autem id quantis potueris documentis faciendum esse defenderis, non solum non suscensebunt, sed etiam praedicabunt. si autem non rebaptizas, arripe libertatem christianam, frater Maximine, arripe, quaeso te; non cuiusquam hominis in contemplatione Christi aut reprehensionem uerearis aut exhorreas potestatem. transit honor huius saeculi, transit ambitio. in futuro Christi iudicio nec absidae gradatae nec cathedrae uelatae nec sanctimonialium occursantium atque cantantium greges adhibebuntur ad defensionem, ubi coeperit accusare conscientia et conscientiarum arbiter iudicare. quae hic honorant, ibi onerant; quae hic releuant, ibi grauant. ista quae pro tempore propter ecclesiae utilitatem honori nostro exhibentur, defendentur forte bona conscientia, defendere autem non poterunt malam.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, most beloved brother, I implore you by the divinity and humanity of our Lord Jesus Christ to deign to write back to me what has been done, and to write back knowing that I wish to read your letter aloud to our brothers in church. I have written this so that, if I later did what you did not expect me to do, I might not offend your love and you might not lodge a just complaint about me with our common friends. I do not see, then, what could hinder you from writing back. For if you rebaptize, you have nothing to fear from the men of your college, since you will have written that you do what they would order you to do even if you did not want to. And when you have defended with all the proofs you can that it should be done, they will not only not be angry, but will even praise you. But if you do not rebaptize, seize Christian freedom, brother Maximinus, seize it, I beg you; looking to Christ, do not fear any man's reproach or shudder at any man's power. The honour of this world passes, ambition passes. At the future judgment of Christ, neither apses raised on steps, nor draped thrones, nor troops of nuns running to meet us and singing will be brought for our defence, when conscience begins to accuse and the arbiter of consciences to judge. What honours here will burden there; what lifts us here will weigh us down there. These things that are shown for the time being to our honour for the good of the church will perhaps be defended by a good conscience, but they will not be able to defend a bad one.

### Translation notes

- 'Your college': Maximinus's fellow Donatist bishops.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.3 (CSEL 34.1:66–67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-3).

## Letter 23.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:67–69
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the one baptism in the name of the Trinity must be recognized wherever it is found, comparing it with circumcision, which was never repeated even for a Samaritan becoming a Jew.

### Latin text

Quod ergo tam pio et tam religioso animo facis, si tamen facis, ut ecclesiae catholicae baptismum non iteres, sed adprobes potius tamquam unius uerissimae matris, quae omnibus gentibus et regenerandis praebet sinum et regeneratis ubera infundit tamquam unius possessionis Christi sese usque ad terrae terminos porrigentis, — si hoc uere facis, cur non erumpis in exultantem et liberam uocem? cur lucernae tuae tam utilem splendorem premis sub modio? cur non discissis atque abiectis ueteribus pellibus timidae seruitutis christiana potius indutus fiducia existis et dicis: Ego unum baptismum noui patris et filii et spiritus sancti nomine consecratum atque signatum; hanc formam ubi inuenio, necesse est ut adprobem; non destruo, quod dominicum agnosco, non exsufflo uexillum regis mei? uestem Christi et qui diuiserunt, non uiolauerunt; et illi adhuc Christum non resurrecturum crediderant, sed morientem uidebant. si a persecutoribus uestis non conscissa est pendentis in cruce, cur a Christianis destruitur sacramentum sedentis in caelo? si ueteris populi temporibus Iudaeus essem, quando aliud esse melius non possem, accepissem utique circumcisionem. quod signaculum iustitiae fidei tantum illo tempore ualuit, antequam domini euacuaretur aduentu, ut infantem filium Moysi angelus praefocasset, nisi mater arrepto calculo circumcidisset puerum et hoc sacramento imminentem perniciem depulisset. hoc sacramentum etiam Iordanen fluuium refrenauit et reduxit in fontem, hoc sacramentum ipse dominus quamuis euacuauerit crucifixus, tamen natus accepit. non enim signacula illa damnata sunt, sed succedentibus opportunioribus decesserunt. nam sicut circumcisionem abstulit domini primus aduentus, sic baptismum auferet secundus aduentus. sicut enim nunc, posteaquam uenit libertas fidei et remotum est seruitutis iugum, nullus christianus circumciditur carne, sic tunc regnantibus iustis cum domino damnatisque impiis nemo baptizabitur, sed illud, quod ista praefigurant, id est circumcisio cordis et mundatio conscientiae manebit in aeternum. si ergo illo tempore Iudaeus essem et ueniret ad me Samaritanus uelletque illo errore derelicto, quem etiam dominus improbauit dicens: Vos adoratis, quod nescitis; nos adoramus, quod scimus, quoniam salus ex Iudaeis est, - uellet ergo Samaritanus, quem Samaritani circumciderant, fieri Iudaeus, uacaret certe iterationis audacia et id, quod apud haeresem factum erat, quod praeceperat deus, non repetere sed adprobare cogeremur. quod si in carne circumcisi hominis non inuenirem locum, ubi circumcisionem repeterem, quia unum est illud membrum, multo minus inuenitur locus in uno corde, ubi baptismum Christi repetatur. ideo qui duplicare baptismum uultis, necesse est omnino, ut corda duplicia requiratis.

### English translation (Claude)

What you do, then, with so pious and religious a mind, if indeed you do it, not repeating the baptism of the Catholic Church but rather approving it as the baptism of the one truest mother, who offers her bosom to all nations to be reborn and pours out her breasts for the reborn, as of the one possession of Christ stretching to the ends of the earth: if you truly do this, why do you not burst out in a joyful and free voice? Why do you hide the so useful brightness of your lamp under a bushel? Why do you not tear apart and throw away the old skins of timid servitude, put on Christian confidence instead, come out, and say: 'I know one baptism, consecrated and sealed in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit; where I find this form, I must approve it; I do not destroy what I recognize as the Lord's; I do not blow upon the standard of my King'? Even those who divided the garments of Christ did not violate them; and they had not yet believed that Christ would rise, but saw him dying. If the garment of him who hung on the cross was not torn by persecutors, why is the sacrament of him who sits in heaven destroyed by Christians? If I had been a Jew in the times of the old people, when I could not have been anything better, I would certainly have received circumcision. That seal of the righteousness of faith had such force at that time, before it was made void by the Lord's coming, that the angel would have strangled the infant son of Moses had his mother not taken a stone and circumcised the boy, and by this sacrament driven off the impending destruction. This sacrament also held back the river Jordan and drove it back to its source; this sacrament the Lord himself, though he made it void when crucified, yet received when born. For those seals were not condemned, but gave way as more fitting ones succeeded them. For as the Lord's first coming took away circumcision, so his second coming will take away baptism. For just as now, after the freedom of faith has come and the yoke of slavery has been removed, no Christian is circumcised in the flesh, so then, when the righteous reign with the Lord and the impious are condemned, no one will be baptized; but what these signs prefigure, that is, the circumcision of the heart and the cleansing of the conscience, will remain for ever. If, then, I had been a Jew at that time, and a Samaritan had come to me wishing to abandon that error which even the Lord condemned when he said, 'You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews' — if, I say, a Samaritan whom the Samaritans had circumcised wished to become a Jew, there would certainly be no room for the audacity of repetition, and we would be compelled not to repeat but to approve what had been done in the heresy, because God had commanded it. And if I could find no place in the flesh of a circumcised man where I could repeat circumcision, because that member is one, much less is a place found in the one heart where the baptism of Christ may be repeated. So you who wish to double baptism must altogether look for double hearts.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:15: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 28:19: allusion, high confidence
- John 19:23–24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:11: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 4:24–26: allusion, high confidence
- Josh 3:16: allusion, low confidence
- Josh 5:2: allusion, low confidence
- John 4:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Blow upon' (exsufflo) refers to the rite of exsufflation, a gesture of exorcism. Allusions: Matt 5:15; Eph 4:5; Matt 28:19; John 19:23–24; Rom 4:11; Exod 4:24–26; the Jordan (Josh 3:16, linked by Augustine with the circumcision of Josh 5); quotation of John 4:22. Augustine's statement that circumcision was 'made void' by Christ's coming is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.4 (CSEL 34.1:67–69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-4).

## Letter 23.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:69–70
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Maximinus not to fear his own councils and hopes for peace, so that Christian families divided between the two communions may share the table of Christ.

### Latin text

Clama ergo recte te facere, si non rebaptizas, et non solum sine trepidatione sed etiam cum gaudio mihi inde rescribe. nulla te tuorum concilia, frater, exterreant. si enim hoc eis displicuerit, non sunt digni, qui te habeant; si autem placuerit, credimus de misericordia domini, qui timentes sibi displicere et conantes placere numquam deserit, quod inter uos et nos cito pax erit, ne propter honores nostros, de qua sarcina periculosa ratio redditur, miserae plebes credentes in Christum habeant in domibus suis communes cibos et mensam Christi communem habere non possint. nonne ingemescimus, quod uir et uxor, ut fideliter coniungant corpora sua, iurant sibi plerumque per Christum et ipsius Christi corpus diuersa communione dilaniant? hoc tantum scandalum, tantus diaboli triumphus, tanta pernicies animarum si per tuam modestiam et prudentiam et dilectionem, quam debemus ei, qui pro nobis suum sanguinem fudit, ablata de medio in his regionibus fuerit, quis explicet uerbis, quam tibi palmam praeparet dominus, ut ad cetera membra sananda, quae per totam Africam tabefacta miserabiliter iacent, a te proficiscatur tam imitabile medicinae documentum? quam uereor, quoniam cor meum uidere non potes, ne tibi cum insultatione potius quam cum dilectione loqui uidear! sed certe, amplius quid faciam, non inuenio, nisi ut inspiciendum sermonem meum tibi offeram, animum deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Proclaim, then, that you are doing right, if you do not rebaptize, and write back to me about it not only without fear but with joy. Let no councils of your people frighten you, brother. For if this displeases them, they are not worthy to have you; but if it pleases them, we trust in the mercy of the Lord, who never deserts those who fear to displease him and try to please him, that there will soon be peace between you and us, so that, on account of our honours (a dangerous burden of which an account must be given), the wretched peoples who believe in Christ may not share common food in their houses yet be unable to share the table of Christ. Do we not groan that husband and wife, in order to join their bodies faithfully, very often swear to each other by Christ, and yet tear apart the body of Christ himself by belonging to different communions? If this great scandal, this great triumph of the devil, this great ruin of souls, is removed from our midst in these regions through your moderation and prudence and the love we owe to him who shed his blood for us, who could express in words what a palm the Lord prepares for you, so that from you there may go out so imitable an example of healing for curing the other members that lie miserably wasting throughout all Africa? How I fear, since you cannot see my heart, that I may seem to you to speak with insult rather than with love! But certainly I find nothing more I can do than to offer my words to you for inspection and my mind to God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.5 (CSEL 34.1:69–70; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-5).

## Letter 23.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:70–71
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that both sides drop the old charges about Macarius and the Circumcellions and that their letters be read publicly, so that the people may learn the difference between the Catholic Church and schism.

### Latin text

Tollamus de medio inania obiecta, quae a partibus inperitis iactari contra inuicem solent, nec tu obicias tempora Macariana nec ego saeuitiam Circumcellionum. si hoc ad te non pertinet, nec illud ad me. area dominica nondum uentilata est; sine paleis esse non potest. nos oremus atque agamus, quantum possumus, ut frumentum simus. ego rebaptizato diacono nostro silere non possum; scio enim, quam mihi silentium perniciosum sit. non enim cogito in ecclesiasticis honoribus tempora uentosa transigere, sed cogito me principi pastorum omnium rationem de commissis ouibus redditurum. si forte nolles, ut haec tibi scriberem, oportet te, frater, ignoscere timori meo; multum enim timeo, ne me tacente et dissimulante alii quoque rebaptizentur a uobis. decreui ergo, quantum uires et facultatem dominus praebere dignatur, causam istam sic agere, ut pacificis conlationibus nostris omnes, qui nobis communicant, nouerint, ab haeresibus aut schismatibus quantum catholica distet ecclesia et quantum sit cauenda pernicies uel zizaniorum uel praecisorum de uite domini sarmentorum. quam conlationem mecum si libenti animo susceperis, ut concordibus nobis amborum litterae populis recitentur, ineffabili exultabo laetitia. si autem id aequo animo non accipis, quid faciam, frater, nisi ut te quoque inuito epistulas nostras populo catholico legam, quo esse possit instructior? quod si rescribere dignatus non fueris, uel meas solas legere decreui, ut saltem diffidentia uestra cognita rebaptizari erubescant.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us remove from our midst the empty charges which ignorant partisans usually hurl at each other: you should not bring up the times of Macarius, nor I the savagery of the Circumcellions. If this does not concern you, neither does that concern me. The Lord's threshing floor has not yet been winnowed; it cannot be without chaff. Let us pray and do what we can, that we may be wheat. I cannot be silent about the rebaptism of our deacon; for I know how ruinous silence would be for me. For I do not intend to pass empty and windy days in church honours, but I bear in mind that I shall render to the Prince of all shepherds an account of the sheep entrusted to me. If perhaps you did not want me to write this to you, you must, brother, pardon my fear; for I greatly fear that, if I am silent and pretend not to see, others too will be rebaptized by you. So I have decided, as far as the Lord deigns to grant strength and means, to conduct this cause in such a way that, through our peaceful conferences, all who are in communion with us may know how far the Catholic Church differs from heresies or schisms, and how much the ruin of the tares, or of the branches cut off from the Lord's vine, must be avoided. If you willingly undertake this conference with me, so that the letters of both of us may be read to the peoples with our agreement, I shall rejoice with unspeakable joy. But if you do not accept it calmly, what shall I do, brother, but read our letters to the Catholic people even against your will, so that it may be better instructed? And if you do not deign to write back, I have decided to read even my own letter alone, so that at least, when your hesitation is known, people may be ashamed to be rebaptized.

### Scripture references

- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 5:4: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:25: allusion, medium confidence
- John 15:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Macarius was the imperial commissioner whose measures against the Donatists in 347 the Donatists remembered as persecution; the Circumcellions were bands associated with the Donatists, accused of violence. Allusions: Matt 3:12; 1 Pet 5:4; Matt 13:25; John 15:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.6 (CSEL 34.1:70–71; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-6).

## Letter 23.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-7
- Source: CSEL 34.1:71–72
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine promises to read the letters only after the soldiers have left, since he does not wish anyone to be forced into communion, and asks that the Circumcellions' violence also cease.

### Latin text

Neque id agam, cum miles praesens est, ne quis uestrum arbitretur tumultuosius me agere uoluisse, quam ratio pacis desiderat, sed post abscessum militis, ut omnes, qui nos audiunt, intellegant non hoc esse propositi mei, ut inuiti homines ad cuiusquam communionem cogantur, sed ut quietissime quaerentibus ueritas innotescat. cessabit a nostris partibus terror temporalium potestatum; cesset etiam a uestris partibus terror congregatorum Circumcellionum. re agamus, ratione agamus, diuinarum scripturarum auctoritatibus agamus, quieti atque tranquilli, quantum possumus, petamus, quaeramus, pulsemus, ut accipiamus et inueniamus et aperiatur nobis, ne forte fieri possit, ut adiuuante domino concordes conatus et orationes nostras tanta deformitas atque impietas Africanarum regionum de nostris terris incipiat aboleri. si non credis post discessum militum me uelle agere, post discessum militum tu rescribe. si enim ego praesente milite litteras meas legere populo uoluero, prolata epistula mea demonstrabit me fidei uiolatorem. quod misericordia domini auertat a moribus atque instituto meo, quod mihi per iugum suum inspirare dignatus est.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor shall I do this while the soldiers are present, lest any of you think that I wanted to act more tumultuously than the principle of peace requires, but after the soldiers have left, so that all who hear us may understand that it is not my purpose that people should be forced against their will into anyone's communion, but that the truth should become known to those who seek it in complete quiet. On our side the terror of temporal powers will cease; let the terror of gathered Circumcellions also cease on your side. Let us deal with the facts, deal with reason, deal with the authorities of the divine Scriptures; quiet and tranquil as far as we can, let us ask, seek and knock, that we may receive and find and it may be opened to us; for perhaps it may come about that, with the Lord helping our harmonious efforts and prayers, so great a deformity and impiety in the regions of Africa may begin to be abolished from our lands. If you do not believe that I mean to act after the soldiers have left, write back after the soldiers have left. For if I wish to read my letter to the people while the soldiers are present, my letter, when produced, will show me to be a breaker of my word. May the mercy of the Lord turn this away from my character and resolve, which he has deigned to inspire in me through his yoke.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- At this date Augustine rejects compulsion into communion; compare his later position in Ep. 93. Allusion to Matt 7:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.7 (CSEL 34.1:71–72; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-7).

## Letter 23.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-8
- Source: CSEL 34.1:72–73
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he wrote in his bishop's absence because the matter was urgent, and closes with a prayer for peace.

### Latin text

Episcopus meus beniuolentiae tuae fortasse potius litteras misisset, si esset praesens, aut ego illo uel iubente uel permittente scripsissem. sed illo absente cum diaconi rebaptizatio recens aut est aut esse dicitur, frigescere actionem ipsam dilatione non passus sum de fraterna et uera morte acerbissimi doloris aculeis excitatus. quem dolorem meum adiuuante misericordia et prouidentia domini pacis fortasse compensatio lenitura est. deus et dominus noster tibi mentem pacatam inspirare dignetur, domine dilectissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

My bishop would perhaps rather have sent a letter to Your Benevolence himself, if he were present, or I would have written at his command or with his permission. But in his absence, since the rebaptism of the deacon either is recent or is said to be, I did not allow the matter itself to grow cold through delay, roused as I was by the stings of most bitter grief over the true death of a brother. Perhaps the compensation of peace, with the help of the mercy and providence of the Lord, will soothe this grief of mine. May our God and Lord deign to inspire in you a peaceful mind, most beloved lord and brother.

### Translation notes

- 'My bishop': Valerius of Hippo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 23.8 (CSEL 34.1:72–73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/22-1/#p-23-8).

## Letter 24.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:73–74
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus of Nola writes to Alypius, bishop of Thagaste, rejoicing in a friendship formed by God before they had met.

### Latin text

Haec est uera caritas, haec perfecta dilectio, quam tibi circa humilitatem nostram inesse docuisti, domine uere sancte et merito beatissime ac desiderabilis. accepimus enim per hominem nostrum Iulianum de Carthagine reuertentem litteras tantam nobis sanctitatis tuae lucem adferentes, ut nobis caritatem tuam non agnoscere sed recognoscere uideremur, quia uidelicet ex illo, qui nos ab origine mundi praedestinauit sibi, caritas ista manauit, in quo facti sumus, antequam nati, quia ipse fecit nos et non ipsi nos, qui fecit, quae futura sunt. huius igitur praescientia et opere formati in similitudinem uoluntatum et unitatem fidei uel unitatis fidem praeueniente notitiam caritate conexi sumus, ut nos inuicem ante corporales conspectus reuelante spiritu nosceremus. gratulamur itaque et gloriamur in domino, qui unus atque idem ubique terrarum operatur in suis dilectionem suam spiritu sancto, quem super omnem carnem effudit fluminis impetu laetificans ciuitatem suam, in cuius te ciuibus principalem cum principibus populi sui sede apostolica merito conlocauit nosque etiam, quos erexit elisos et de terra inopes suscitauit, in uestra uoluit sorte numerari. sed magis gratulamur in eo domini munere, quo nos in pectoris tui habitatione constituit quoque ita uisceribus tuis insinuare dignatus est, ut peculiarem nobis caritatis tuae fiduciam uindicemus his officiis atque muneribus prouocati, ut nos diffidenter aut leuiter te amare non liceat.

### English translation (Claude)

This is true love, this is perfect charity, which you have shown to be in you toward our lowliness, truly holy lord, deservedly most blessed and longed for. For through our servant Julian, returning from Carthage, we received a letter bringing us such light from Your Holiness that we seemed not to come to know your love but to recognize it again, since that love flowed from him who predestined us for himself from the beginning of the world, in whom we were made before we were born, because he made us, and not we ourselves, he who made the things that are to be. Formed, then, by his foreknowledge and work into a likeness of wills and the unity of faith, or the faith of unity, we have been joined by a love that came before acquaintance, so that we knew each other, the Spirit revealing it, before seeing each other in the body. We rejoice, therefore, and glory in the Lord, who, one and the same, works his love in his own throughout the earth by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out upon all flesh, gladdening his city with the rush of the river; among whose citizens he has deservedly placed you as a leader, with the princes of his people, in an apostolic see; and he has willed that we too, whom he raised up when we were crushed and lifted up from the earth in our need, should be counted in your lot. But we rejoice more in that gift of the Lord by which he has placed us in the dwelling of your heart and deigned to bring us so deep into your inmost affections that we may claim a special confidence in your love, provoked by these services and gifts, so that we may not love you with diffidence or lightly.

### Scripture references

- Eph 1:4–5: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 100:3 (99:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:17: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 46:4 (45:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 146:8 (145:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 113:7–8 (112:7-Ps LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Paulinus (later bishop of Nola) to Alypius (NPNF omits it). 'Apostolic see' here means simply a bishop's see. Allusions: Eph 1:4–5; Ps 100:3 (LXX 99:3); Acts 2:17 (Joel 2:28); Ps 46:4; Ps 146:8; Ps 113:7–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.1 (CSEL 34.1:73–74; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-1).

## Letter 24.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:74–75
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus thanks Alypius for five books of Augustine against the Manichaeans, sends greetings to the clergy and monks, and praises Alypius's ascetic life amid his pastoral work.

### Latin text

Accepimus enim insigne praecipuum dilectionis et sollicitudinis tuae opus sancti et perfecti in domino Christo uiri, fratris nostri Augustini, libris quinque confectum, quod ita miramur atque suspicimus, ut dictata diuinitus uerba credamus. itaque fiducia suspiciendae nobis unanimitatis tuae et ad ipsum scribere ausi sumus, dum nos illi per te et de inperitia excusandos et ad caritatem commendandos praesumimus sicut et omnibus sanctis, quorum nos et absentium officiis sospitare dignatus es pari procul dubio curaturus affectu, ut per sanctitatem tuam nostris inuicem salutentur obsequiis et in clero sanctitatis tuae comites et in monasteriis fidei ac uirtutis tuae aemulatores. nam etsi in populis ac super populum agas oues pascuae domini regens sollicitis uigil pastor excubiis, tamen abdicatione saeculi et repulsa carnis ac sanguinis desertum tibi ipse fecisti secretus a multis, uocatus in paucis.

### English translation (Claude)

For we have received an outstanding mark of your love and care: the work of our brother Augustine, a holy man and perfect in Christ the Lord, completed in five books, which we so admire and look up to that we believe its words were dictated by God. So, trusting in your oneness of heart, which we must revere, we have dared to write to him too, presuming that through you we shall be excused to him for our lack of skill and commended to his love; as also to all the saints, whom you will no doubt take care, with the same affection with which you have deigned to cheer us with your kind services though absent, to have greeted in turn with our respects through Your Holiness, both the companions of Your Holiness in the clergy and the imitators of your faith and virtue in the monasteries. For although you act among the peoples and over the people, ruling the sheep of the Lord's pasture as a watchful shepherd with anxious vigils, yet by renouncing the world and rejecting flesh and blood you have made a desert for yourself, set apart from the many, called among the few.

### Scripture references

- Ps 100:3 (99:3 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 22:14: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The five books are Augustine's anti-Manichaean works. Allusions: Ps 100:3; Matt 22:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.2 (CSEL 34.1:74–75; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-2).

## Letter 24.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:75–76
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus reports that he has had a copy made of Eusebius's Chronicle, borrowed from Domnio at Rome, to be sent to Alypius through Aurelius of Carthage.

### Latin text

Sane uicario aliquatenus munere licet omnia tibi inpar, ut iusseras, prouidi illam Eusebii, uenerabilis episcopi Constantinopolitani, de cunctis temporibus historiam. sed in hoc fuit obtemperandi mora, quod instructu tuo, quia ipse non haberem hunc codicem, Romae repperi apud parentem nostrum uere sanctissimum Domnionem, qui procul dubio promptius mihi paruit in hoc beneficio, quod tibi deferendum indicaui. uerum tamen quia et loca tua mihi significare dignatus es, ut ipse monuisti, ad uenerabilem socium coronae tuae, patrem nostrum Aurelium, ita scripsimus, ut, si nunc Hippone Regio degeres, illo tibi litteras nostras et transcriptam Carthagine membranam mittere dignaretur. quod et sanctos uiros, quos indice caritatis ipsorum tuo sermone cognouimus, Comitem et Euodium rogauimus, ut scribere ipsi curarent, ne uel parenti Domnioni codex suus diutius deforet et tibi transmissus sine necessitate redhibendi maneret.

### English translation (Claude)

As a kind of return gift, though unequal to you in every way, I have, as you had requested, provided that History of all times by Eusebius, the venerable bishop of Constantinople. But the delay in obeying was due to the fact that, following your instruction, since I myself did not have this book, I found it at Rome with our truly most holy father Domnio, who no doubt obliged me all the more readily in this kindness because I told him it was to be sent to you. However, since you have deigned to tell me where you are, as you yourself advised, we have written to your venerable fellow in the crown, our father Aurelius, asking that, if you are now staying at Hippo Regius, he deign to send you there our letter and the parchment copied at Carthage. We have also asked the holy men Comes and Evodius, whom we have come to know through your words, which bear witness to their love, to take care to write themselves, so that father Domnio might not be without his book too long and the copy sent to you might remain with you without need of returning it.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Chron. (Eusebius and Jerome, Chronicle): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Paulinus calls Eusebius 'bishop of Constantinople'; the work is the Chronicle of Eusebius of Caesarea, probably in Jerome's Latin version.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.3 (CSEL 34.1:75–76; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-3).

## Letter 24.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:76
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Alypius to tell him his life story and whether he too was brought to the faith by Ambrose, and tells of his own baptism at Bordeaux and forced ordination at Barcelona.

### Latin text

Specialiter autem hoc a te peto, quoniam me inmerentem et inopinantem magno tui amore complesti, ut pro hac historia temporum referas mihi omnem tuae sanctitatis historiam, ut, qui genus, unde sis (domo) tanto uocatus a domino, quibus exordiis segregatus ab utero matris tuae ad matrem filiorum dei prole laetantem abiurata carnis et sanguinis stirpe transieris et in genus regale ac sacerdotale sis translatus, edisseras. quod enim indicasti iam de humilitatis nostrae nomine apud Mediolanium te didicisse, cum illic initiareris, fateor curiosius me uelle condiscere, ut omni parte te nouerim, quo magis gratuler, si a suscipiendo mihi patre nostro Ambrosio uel ad fidem inuitatus es uel ad sacerdotium consecratus, ut eundem ambo habere uideamur auctorem. nam ego etsi a Delphino Burdigalae baptizatus, a Lampio apud Barcilonem in Hispania per uim inflammatae subito plebis sacratus sim, tamen Ambrosii semper et dilectione ad fidem innutritus sum et nunc in sacerdotii ordinatione confoueor. denique suo me clero uoluit uindicare, ut, etsi diuersis locis degam, ipsius presbyter censear.

### English translation (Claude)

But I ask this of you especially, since you have filled me, undeserving and unexpecting, with great love for you: that in return for this history of the times you relate to me the whole history of Your Holiness; that you explain who you are by family, from what home you were called by so great a Lord, by what beginnings you were set apart from your mother's womb and, having renounced the stock of flesh and blood, passed over to the mother of the children of God who rejoices in her offspring, and were transferred into the royal and priestly race. For as to what you indicated, that you learned the name of our lowliness at Milan when you were being initiated there, I confess that I want to learn more about it, so that I may know you in every respect, and may rejoice the more if it was by our father Ambrose, whom I must revere, that you were either invited to the faith or consecrated to the priesthood, so that we both may be seen to have the same author. For although I was baptized by Delphinus at Bordeaux, and ordained by Lampius at Barcelona in Spain through the force of the people, suddenly inflamed, yet I have always been nourished in the faith by the love of Ambrose and am now cherished by him in the order of the priesthood. In short, he wished to claim me for his own clergy, so that, though I live in other places, I may be counted his presbyter.

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 113:9 (112:9 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 2:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Home' (domo) is supplied by the editor. Alypius was baptized at Milan in 387 with Augustine. Allusions: Gal 1:15; Ps 113:9 (LXX 112:9); 1 Pet 2:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.4 (CSEL 34.1:76; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-4).

## Letter 24.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:76–77
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus describes himself as a recent convert and asks Alypius for his prayers and letters.

### Latin text

Sed de me ne quid ignores, scias antiquissimum peccatorem non ita olim de tenebris et umbra mortis eductum spiritum aurae uitalis hausisse nec ita olim posuisse in aratro manum et crucem domini sustulisse, quam ut in finem perferre ualeamus, orationibus tuis adiuuemur. accumulabitur haec meritis tuis merces, si interuentu tuo onera nostra releuaueris. sanctus enim laborantem adiuuans, quia fratrem non audemus dicere, exaltabitur sicut ciuitas magna. et tu quidem super montem aedificata ciuitas es uel accensa super candelabrum lucerna in septiformi claritate conluces, nos sub modio peccatorum delitescimus. uisita litteris tuis et profer in lucem, in qua ipse uersaris super aurea candelabra conspicuus; eloquia tua lumen semitis nostris erunt et oleo lucernae tuae inpinguabitur caput nostrum; et accendetur fides, cum de spiritu oris tui cibum mentis et lumen animae sumpserimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But so that you may not be ignorant of anything about me, know that I am a sinner of very long standing, who not so long ago was led out of darkness and the shadow of death and drew the breath of life-giving air, and not so long ago put my hand to the plough and took up the cross of the Lord; that we may be able to carry it to the end, let us be helped by your prayers. This reward will be added to your merits, if by your intercession you lighten our burdens. For the saint who helps one who toils (for we do not dare to say brother) will be exalted like a great city. And you indeed are a city built on a mountain, or a lamp lit on a lampstand, shining with sevenfold brightness, while we lie hidden under the bushel of our sins. Visit us with your letters and bring us out into the light in which you yourself move, conspicuous above the golden lampstands; your words will be a light to our paths, and our head will be anointed with the oil of your lamp; and faith will be kindled when we take from the spirit of your mouth the food of the mind and the light of the soul.

### Scripture references

- Ps 107:14 (106:14 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 1:79: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 9:62: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 16:24: allusion, medium confidence
- Prov 18:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:14–15: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 1:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 119:105 (118:105 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Ps 107:14 and Luke 1:79; Luke 9:62; Matt 16:24; Prov 18:19 (Latin form, 'a brother helped by a brother is like a strong city'); Matt 5:14–15; Rev 1:12; Ps 119:105.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.5 (CSEL 34.1:76–77; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-5).

## Letter 24.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:77–78
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus closes with greetings to the African churches and monasteries and sends Alypius a loaf as a sign of unity.

### Latin text

Pax et gratia dei tecum et corona iustitiae tibi maneat in die illo, domine pater merito dilectissime, uenerabilis et exoptatissime. benedictos sanctitatis tuae comites et aemulatores, in domino fratres, si dignantur, nostros tam in ecclesiis quam in monasteriis Carthagini, Tagastae, Hippone Regio et totis paroeciis tuis atque omnibus cognitis tibi per Africam locis domino catholice seruientes multo affectu et obsequio salutari rogamus. si ipsam membranam sancti Domnionis acceperis, transcriptam nobis remittere dignaberis. et hoc rogo scribas mihi, quem hymnum meum agnoueris. panem unum sanctitati tuae unitatis gratia misimus, in quo etiam trinitatis soliditas continetur. hunc panem eulogiam esse tu facies dignatione sumendi.

### English translation (Claude)

Peace and the grace of God be with you, and may the crown of righteousness await you on that day, lord father, deservedly most beloved, venerable and most longed for. We ask that the blessed companions and imitators of Your Holiness, our brothers in the Lord, if they will allow it, both in the churches and in the monasteries at Carthage, Thagaste and Hippo Regius, and in all your parishes and all places known to you throughout Africa, who serve the Lord in the Catholic faith, be greeted with much affection and respect. If you receive the parchment of holy Domnio, you will deign to send it back to us copied. And I ask you to write and tell me which hymn of mine you recognized. We have sent Your Holiness one loaf as a sign of unity, in which the solidity of the Trinity is also contained. You will make this bread a blessing by deigning to receive it.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The loaf (eulogia) was a customary gift of blessed bread between Christians. Allusion to 2 Tim 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 24.6 (CSEL 34.1:77–78; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-24-6).

## Letter 25.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:78–79
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus of Nola writes to Augustine praising his five books against the Manichaeans, received through Alypius.

### Latin text

Caritas Christi, quae urget nos et absentes licet per unitatem fidei alligat, ipsa fiduciam ad te scribendi pudore depulso praestitit teque per litteras tuas uisceribus meis intimauit, quas et de scholasticis facultatibus adfluentes et de caelestibus fauis dulces ut animae meae medicas et altrices in quinque libris interim teneo, quos munere benedicti et uenerabilis nobis episcopi nostri Alypii non pro nostra instructione tantum, sed etiam pro ecclesiae multarum urbium utilitate suscepimus. hos igitur nunc libros lectioni habeo, in his me oblecto, de his cibum capio non illum, qui perit, sed qui operatur uitae aeternae substantiam per fidem nostram, qua adcorporamur in Christo Iesu domino nostro, cum fides nostra, quae uisibilium neglegens inuisibilibus inhiat, per caritatem omnia secundum ueritatem omnipotentis dei credentem litteris et exemplis fidelium roboretur. o uere sal terrae, quo praecordia nostra, ne possint saeculi errore uanescere, condiuntur! o lucerna digne super candelabrum ecclesiae posita, quae late catholicis urbibus de septiformi lychno pastum oleo laetitiae lumen effundens densas licet haereticorum caligines discutis et lucem ueritatis a confusione tenebrarum splendore clarifici sermonis enubilas!

### English translation (Claude)

The love of Christ, which urges us on and binds us, though absent, through the unity of faith, has itself driven off shyness and given me confidence to write to you, and has set you in my inmost heart through your writings. These, abounding in the resources of the schools and sweet from heavenly honeycombs, I now hold in five books as physicians and nurses of my soul; we received them by the gift of our blessed and venerable bishop Alypius, not for our own instruction only, but also for the benefit of the church in many cities. These books, then, I now have for reading; in them I delight; from them I take food, not the food that perishes, but that which works the substance of eternal life through our faith, by which we are incorporated into Christ Jesus our Lord, since our faith, which neglects visible things and gapes after invisible ones, is strengthened by the writings and examples of the faithful, through the love that believes all things according to the truth of almighty God. O truly salt of the earth, by which our hearts are seasoned so that they may not fade away through the error of the world! O lamp worthily set on the lampstand of the church, which, pouring far and wide over Catholic cities the light fed from the sevenfold lamp with the oil of gladness, scatters the darkness of the heretics, however thick, and clears the light of truth from the confusion of darkness by the splendour of your illuminating speech!

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:27: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:18: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:7: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:13–15: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 45:7 (44:8 LXX): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Paulinus (with Therasia) to Augustine; the address is not printed in the digital text. Quotation of 2 Cor 5:14; allusions: John 6:27; 2 Cor 4:18; 1 Cor 13:7; Matt 5:13–15; Ps 45:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 25.1 (CSEL 34.1:78–79; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-1).

## Letter 25.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:79–80
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine for further writings against other heretics and describes his conversion from worldly learning.

### Latin text

Vides, frater unanime, admirabilis in Christo domino et suscipiende, quam familiariter te agnouerim, quanto admirer stupore, quam magno amore complectar, qui cotidie conloquio litterarum tuarum fruor et oris tui spiritu uescor. os enim tuum fistulam aquae uiuae et uenam fontis aeterni merito dixerim, quia fons in te aquae salientis in uitam aeternam Christus effectus est. cuius desiderio sitiuit in te anima mea et ubertate tui fluminis inebriari terra mea concupiuit. ideoque cum hoc Pentateucho tuo contra Manichaeos me satis armaueris, si qua in alios quoque hostes catholicae fidei munimina comparasti, quia hostis noster, cui mille nocendi artes tam uariis expugnandus est telis, quam oppugnat insidiis, quaeso promere mihi de armamentario tuo et conferre non abnuas arma iustitiae. sum enim laboriosus etiam nunc sub magno onere peccator, ueteranus in numero peccatorum, sed aeterno regi nouus incorporeae tiro militiae. sapientiam mundi miser hucusque miratus sum et per inutiles litteras reprobatamque prudentiam deo stultus et mutus fui. postquam inueteraui inter inimicos meos et euanui in cogitationibus meis, leuaui oculos meos in montes ad praecepta legis et gratiae dona suspiciens, unde mihi auxilium uenit a domino, qui non secundum iniquitates retribuens inluminauit caecum, soluit compeditum, humiliauit erectum male, ut erigeret humiliatum pie.

### English translation (Claude)

You see, brother of one mind, admirable in Christ the Lord and to be revered, how intimately I have come to know you, with what amazement I admire you, with what great love I embrace you, I who daily enjoy conversation with your writings and feed on the breath of your mouth. For I might rightly call your mouth a pipe of living water and a vein of the eternal spring, because Christ has become in you a spring of water welling up to eternal life. Longing for it, my soul has thirsted for you, and my land has desired to be drunk with the abundance of your river. And so, since you have armed me well against the Manichaeans with this Pentateuch of yours, if you have prepared any defences also against other enemies of the Catholic faith (for our enemy, 'who has a thousand arts of harm', must be fought with weapons as varied as the ambushes with which he attacks), I ask you not to refuse to bring out for me from your armoury and confer on me the arms of righteousness. For I am still a toiling sinner under a heavy burden, a veteran in the ranks of sinners, but a new recruit to the eternal King in incorporeal warfare. Wretched man, I have till now admired the wisdom of the world, and through useless letters and reprobate prudence I was foolish and dumb before God. After I had grown old among my enemies and become vain in my thoughts, I lifted up my eyes to the mountains, looking up to the precepts of the law and the gifts of grace, whence my help comes from the Lord, who, not repaying according to our iniquities, gave light to the blind, loosed the fettered, humbled the wrongly exalted, that he might lift up the piously humbled.

### Scripture references

- John 4:14: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 63:1 (62:2 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 6:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:20: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 6:7 (6:8 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:21: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 121:1–2 (120:1-Ps LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:10 (102:10 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 146:7–8 (145:7-Ps LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 7.338 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'A thousand arts of harm' is Virgil, Aeneid 7.338. The 'Pentateuch' is the five anti-Manichaean books. Allusions: John 4:14; Ps 63:1; 2 Cor 6:7; 1 Cor 1:20; Ps 6:7 (LXX 6:8); Rom 1:21; Ps 121:1–2; Ps 103:10; Ps 146:7–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 25.2 (CSEL 34.1:79–80; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-2).

## Letter 25.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:80–81
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus, older in years but young in faith, asks Augustine to be his father in spiritual learning and to support him with his prayers.

### Latin text

Sequor igitur non aequis adhuc passibus magna iustorum uestigia, si possim orationibus uestris adprehendere, in quo dei miserationibus adprehensus sum. rege ergo paruulum incerta reptantem et tuis gressibus ingredi doce. nolo enim me corporalis ortus magis quam spiritalis exortus aetate consideres. quippe aetas mihi secundum carnem iam ea est, qua fuit ille ab apostolis in porta Speciosa uerbi potestate sanatus. in natalibus autem animae illius adhuc mihi tempus infantiae est, quae intentatis Christo uulneribus immolata digno sanguine agni uictimam praecucurrit et dominicam auspicata est passionem. atque ideo ut infantem adhuc uerbo dei et spiritali aetate lactantem educa uerbis tuis uberibus fidei, sapientiae, caritatis inhiantem. si officium commune consideras, frater es; si maturitatem ingenii tui et sensuum, pater mihi es, etsi forte sis aeuo iunior, quia te ad maturitatem meriti honore seniorum prouexit et iuuenem cana prudentia. foue igitur et corrobora me in sacris litteris et spiritalibus studiis tempore, ut dixi, recentem et ob hoc post longa discrimina, post multa naufragia usu rudem, uixdum a fluctibus saeculi emergentem tu, qui iam solido litore constitisti, toto excipe sinu, ut in portu salutis, si dignum putas, pariter nauigemus. interea me de periculis uitae istius et profundo peccatorum euadere nitentem orationibus tuis tamquam tabula sustine, ut de hoc mundo quasi de naufragio nudus euadam.

### English translation (Claude)

I follow, then, with steps not yet equal to theirs, the great footsteps of the righteous, to see whether by your prayers I can lay hold of that for which I have been laid hold of by the mercies of God. Guide, then, a little one crawling uncertainly, and teach him to walk in your steps. For I do not want you to consider me by the age of my bodily birth rather than of my spiritual rising. For in the flesh my age is now that of the man healed by the apostles at the Beautiful Gate by the power of the word. But in the birth of the soul I am still at the age of those infants who were sacrificed by the wounds aimed at Christ, ran ahead of the victim of the Lamb with worthy blood, and inaugurated the Lord's passion. And so, as an infant still nursing on the word of God and in spiritual age, bring me up with your words, as I long for the breasts of faith, wisdom and love. If you consider our common office, you are my brother; if the maturity of your mind and judgment, you are my father, even if perhaps younger in years, because grey-haired prudence has advanced you, though young, to the maturity of merit with the honour of elders. Cherish and strengthen me, then, in the sacred writings and spiritual studies, new as I am in time, as I said, and for that reason, after long dangers and many shipwrecks, unskilled in practice, scarcely emerging from the waves of the world; you who already stand on the solid shore, receive me with your whole bosom, so that, if you think it fitting, we may sail together into the harbour of salvation. Meanwhile, as I strive to escape from the dangers of this life and the depth of sins, hold me up with your prayers as with a plank, so that I may escape from this world naked, as from a shipwreck.

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 3:2: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 4:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 2:16: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 2:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:8–9 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The man at the Beautiful Gate was over forty (Acts 3:2; 4:22); the infants are the Innocents of Matt 2:16. 'Grey-haired prudence' recalls Wis 4:8–9. Allusions also to Phil 3:12 and 1 Pet 2:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 25.3 (CSEL 34.1:80–81; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-3).

## Letter 25.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:81–82
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus describes his renunciation of wealth, says he has not yet attained what he desires, and rejoices that God has made him a fellow cleric with Augustine.

### Latin text

Idcirco enim leuare me sarcinis et uestimentis onerantibus exuere curaui, ut undosum hoc, quod inter nos et deum peccatis interlatrantibus separat, praesentis uitae salum omni amictu carnis et cura diei sequentis iubente et iuuante Christo expeditus enatem. neque id perfecisse me glorior, quod etsi gloriari possem, in domino gloriarer, cuius est perficere, quod nobis uelle adiacet; sed concupiscit adhuc anima mea desiderare iudicia domini. uide quando adsequatur effectum dei uoluntatum, qui adhuc ipsum desiderare desiderat. quod in me tamen est, dilexi decorem domus sanctae et, quantum in me fuit, elegeram abiectus esse in domo domini. sed cui placuit segregare me ab utero matris meae et ab amicitia carnis et sanguinis ad gratiam suam trahere, eidem placuit inopem me omnis boni menti suscitare de terra et de lacu miseriarum ac de luto faecis educere, ut conlocaret me cum principibus populi sui et partem meam in tua sorte poneret, ut te praestante meritis officio sociatus aequarer.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason I have taken care to lighten myself of baggage and strip off burdensome clothing, so that, at Christ's command and with his help, freed from every covering of flesh and from care for the next day, I might swim across this stormy sea of the present life, which separates us from God, with our sins barking in between. Nor do I boast that I have accomplished this; for even if I could boast, I would boast in the Lord, whose it is to accomplish what to will is present with us; but my soul still longs to desire the judgments of the Lord. See when he may attain the fulfilment of the will of God who still desires to desire it. Yet as far as in me lies, I have loved the beauty of the holy house, and, as far as was in me, I had chosen to be cast down in the house of the Lord. But he who was pleased to set me apart from my mother's womb and to draw me from the friendship of flesh and blood to his grace was also pleased to raise me, needy of every good, from the earth, and to lead me out of the pit of miseries and the mire of dregs, to set me with the princes of his people and to place my portion in your lot, so that, joined to you in office, I might be made equal to you who excel me in merits.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:34: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 10:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:18: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 119:20 (118:20 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 26:8 (25:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 84:10 (83:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 113:7–8 (112:7-Ps LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 40:2 (39:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 6:34; 2 Cor 10:17; Rom 7:18; Ps 119:20 (LXX 118:20); Ps 26:8; Ps 84:10; Gal 1:15; Ps 113:7–8; Ps 40:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 25.4 (CSEL 34.1:81–82; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-4).

## Letter 25.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:82–83
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus commends his friendship to Augustine through Alypius, sends greetings, and sends a loaf as a sign of unity.

### Latin text

Praesumptione igitur non mea, sed placito et ordinatione domini fraternitatis tuae mihi foedus usurpans tanto indignus honore me dignor, quia te pro tua sanctitate certo scio — nam ueritate sapis — non alta sapere, sed humilibus congruere. ideoque prompte et intime recepturum spero caritatem humilitatis nostrae, quam quidem iam recepisse te per beatissimum sacerdotem Alypium, quia dignatur, patrem nostrum, confido. is enim sine dubio de se tibi exemplum praebuit nos ante notitiam et supra meritum diligendi, qui incognitos sibi nos et longinqua soli uel sali intercapedine disparatos spiritu uerae dilectionis, qui ubique et penetrat et effunditur, et uidere diligendo potuit et adloquendo pertingere. hic nobis prima affectus sui documenta et caritatis tuae pignora in supra dicto munere librorum dedit. et quanto studuit impendio, ut sanctitatem tuam non ipsius tantum uerbis, sed plenius eloquentia et fide tua cognitam non possemus amare mediocriter, tantopere curasse eundem credimus, ut nos uicissim ipsius imitatione plurimum diligas. gratia dei tecum, ut est, in aeternum maneat optamus, frater in Christo domino unanime, uenerabilis, desiderantissime. totam domum et omnem comitem et aemulatorem in domino sanctitatis tuae plurimo fraternitatis unanimae salutamus affectu. panem unum, quem unanimitatis indicio misimus caritati tuae, rogamus accipiendo benedicas.

### English translation (Claude)

So, claiming for myself the bond of your brotherhood, not by my own presumption but by the pleasure and ordinance of the Lord, I, unworthy of so great an honour, deem myself worthy of it, because I know for certain that, in keeping with your holiness (for you have a taste for truth), you do not set your mind on high things but associate with the lowly. And so I hope you will receive readily and inwardly the love of our lowliness, which indeed I trust you have already received through the most blessed bishop Alypius, our father, since he deigns to be so. For he no doubt gave you in himself an example of loving us before acquaintance and beyond our merit, he who, through the spirit of true love, which penetrates and is poured out everywhere, could both see us by loving and reach us by addressing us, though we were unknown to him and separated by a long distance of land and sea. He gave us the first proofs of his affection and pledges of your love in the gift of books mentioned above. And as he strove with great effort that we should be unable to love only moderately Your Holiness, made known to us not only by his words but more fully by your own eloquence and faith, so we believe he took equal care that you in turn, imitating him, should love us very much. May the grace of God remain with you, as it does, for ever, we pray, brother of one mind in Christ the Lord, venerable, most longed for. We greet your whole house and every companion and imitator of Your Holiness in the Lord with the greatest affection of unanimous brotherhood. We ask you to bless, by receiving it, the one loaf which we have sent to your Love as a sign of unanimity.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Bishop' renders sacerdos. Allusion to Rom 12:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 25.5 (CSEL 34.1:82–83; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-25-5).

## Letter 26.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:83–84
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to his former pupil Licentius, reporting on a request he made for him and turning to the state of his soul.

### Latin text

Vix repperi occasionem scribendi tibi. quis credat? sed mihi tamen Licentium necesse est credere. nolo te causas rationesque rimari, quae etiam si reddi possent, fidei tamen, qua mihi credis, non eas debeo. nam et litteras tuas non per eos accepi, per quos possem scripta redhibere. quae autem petisti, ut peterem, curaui per epistulam, quantum promendum uidebatur; sed quid effecerim, tu uideris. quod si nondum effectum est, uel, cum sciero, agam instantius uel, cum rursus ipse admonueris. hactenus, quae huius uitae uincula perstrepunt, tecum locutus sim; nunc paucis accipe pectoris mei aestus de spe tua non transitoria, quod quodam modo uia tibi patescat in deum.

### English translation (Claude)

I have scarcely found an opportunity of writing to you. Who would believe it? But Licentius must believe me. I do not want you to search out the causes and reasons; even if they could be given, I do not owe them to the trust with which you believe me. Besides, I did not receive your letter through people by whom I could send back a reply. As for what you asked me to request, I have taken care of it by letter, as far as seemed proper to put forward; but what I have achieved you will see. If it has not yet been achieved, I will press more urgently, either when I learn of it or when you yourself remind me again. So far I have spoken with you of the things about which the chains of this life clamour; now receive in a few words the surgings of my heart concerning your hope that does not pass away, so that in some way the road to God may open before you.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Licentius, son of Romanianus and Augustine's former pupil.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.1 (CSEL 34.1:83–84; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-1).

## Letter 26.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:84–85
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Licentius that in fleeing the bonds of wisdom he is binding himself to the harsher bonds of worldly ambition.

### Latin text

Mi Licenti, etiam atque etiam recusantem et formidantem compedes sapientiae timeo te rebus mortalibus ualidissime et perniciosissime compediri. nam sapientia quos primo alligauerit et exercitatoriis quibusdam laboribus edomuerit, soluet postea liberatisque sese donat ad fruendum; et quos primo temporalibus nexibus erudiuerit, post aeternis amplexibus alligabit, quo uinculo nec iucundius nec solidius cogitari quicquam potest. prima haec aliquantulum dura esse confiteor; illa uero ultima nec dura dixerim, quia dulcissima sunt, nec mollia, quia firmissima. quid igitur, nisi quod dici non potest, sed credi tamen et sperari et amari potest? uincula uero huius mundi asperitatem habent ueram, iucunditatem falsam; certum dolorem, incertam uoluptatem; durum laborem, timidam quietem; rem plenam miseriae, spem beatitudinis inanem. hisne tu inseris et collum et manus et pedes, cum et honoribus huiusce modi subiugari adfectas et facta tua non aliter fructuosa existimas et ambis inhaerere, quo non modo inuitatus, sed nec compulsus quidem ire debuisti?

### English translation (Claude)

My Licentius, while you again and again refuse and dread the fetters of wisdom, I fear that you are being fettered most strongly and most ruinously by mortal things. For those whom wisdom first binds and tames by certain labours of training, it will later loose, and give itself to them, once freed, to enjoy; and those whom it first trains with temporal bonds it will later bind with eternal embraces, and no bond more delightful or more solid than this can be thought of. These first bonds I confess are somewhat hard; but those last I would call neither hard, for they are most sweet, nor soft, for they are most firm. What then are they, except what cannot be spoken, but can yet be believed, hoped for, and loved? But the bonds of this world have real harshness and false delight, certain pain and uncertain pleasure, hard labour and fearful rest, a reality full of misery and an empty hope of happiness. Is it into these that you thrust your neck and hands and feet, when you aspire to be yoked to honours of this kind and think your deeds fruitful in no other way, and strive to cling to a place to which you ought not to have gone even under compulsion, let alone when invited?

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 6:24–30 (Sirach): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The 'fetters of wisdom' recall Sir 6:24–30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.2 (CSEL 34.1:84–85; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-2).

## Letter 26.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:85–86
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine anticipates Licentius's mocking reply and says he will keep exhorting him even if he does not respond.

### Latin text

Hic tu fortasse Terentiani serui mihi responsum dederis: Ohe! tu uerba fundis hic, sapientia? cape igitur, ut fundam potius quam effundam. aut si ego canto, tu autem ad aliam uocem saltas, nec sic quidem me paenitet. habet enim suam hilaritatem ipsa cantatio, etiam cum ad eam membra non mouet, cui plena caritatis modulatione cantatur. uerba quaedam in epistulis tuis me mouerunt, sed de his tractare, cum factorum uitaeque totius tuae cura excoquat, ineptum putaui.

### English translation (Claude)

Here perhaps you will give me the reply of Terence's slave: 'Oho! You pour out words here, Wisdom?' Take them, then, so that I may pour them into you rather than pour them away. Or if I sing and you dance to another tune, even so I do not regret it. For the singing itself has its own cheerfulness, even when the one to whom it is sung with a melody full of love does not move his limbs to it. Certain words in your letters troubled me, but I thought it foolish to deal with them while concern for your deeds and your whole life is burning me up.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Phorm. 541 (Terence): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The line is Terence, Phormio 541, where 'Wisdom' is a mocking address; Augustine puns on fundere ('pour') and effundere ('pour away, waste').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.3 (CSEL 34.1:85–86; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-3).

## Letter 26.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:86–87
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts Licentius's care for correct verse with his neglect of an ordered life, and takes up his poem's line 'only bid me' by bidding him give himself to God.

### Latin text

Si uersus tuus momentis inordinatis peruersus esset, si suis legibus non staret, si mensuris inparibus aurem auditoris offenderet, puderet te certe nec differres nec desisteres, donec ordinares, corrigeres, statueres, aequares uersum tuum discendo et agendo artem metricam acerrimo studio et labore quolibet. quid; cum inordinatus ipse peruerteris, cum legibus dei tui ipse non stas neque in agenda uita honestis tuorum uotis et huic ipsi eruditioni tuae concinis, abiciendum post tergum putas et neglegendum? quasi prae sono linguae tuae sis tibi uilior et, incompositis moribus quod offendis aures dei, leuius sit, quam si incompositis syllabis tuis grammatica suscenseret auctoritas. scribis: O mihi transactos reuocet si pristina soles laetificis aurora rotis, quos libera tecum otia temptantes et candida iura bonorum duximus Italiae medio montesque per altos! non me dura gelu prohiberent frigora cano nec fera tempestas Zephyrum fremitusque Borini, quin tua sollicito premerem uestigia passu. hoc opus ut iubeas tantum. Me miserum, si ego non iubeo, si non cogo atque impero, si non rogo ac supplico. sed si aures tuae aduersus meas uoces clausae sunt, ori tuo pateant, pateant carmini tuo; exaudi te ipsum, durissime, immanissime, surdissime. quo mihi linguam auream et cor ferreum? quibus ego non carminibus sed lamentationibus sufficiam plangere carmina tua, in quibus uideo, quam animam, quod ingenium non mihi liceat adprehendere et immolare deo nostro? expectas, ut ego iubeam, sis bonus, sis quietus, sis beatus; quasi quicquam mihi dierum gratius inlucescat, quam ut ingenio tuo fruar in domino, aut uere tu nescias, quod te esuriam et sitiam, aut non hoc ipso id carmine fatearis. reuoca animum, quo ista scripsisti; nunc mihi dic: Hoc opus ut iubeas tantum. ecce iussum meum: da mihi te, si hoc opus est tantum; da domino meo te, qui omnium nostrum dominus est, qui tibi illud donauit ingenium. nam ego quid sum, nisi seruus tuus per ipsum et conseruus sub ipso?

### English translation (Claude)

If your verse were distorted by disordered quantities, if it did not stand by its own laws, if it offended the listener's ear with unequal measures, you would surely be ashamed, and you would neither put it off nor stop until you had ordered, corrected, set straight and evened your verse, learning and practising the art of metre with the keenest zeal and any labour. What then? When you yourself are distorted and disordered, when you do not stand by the laws of your God, and do not harmonize in the conduct of your life with the honourable wishes of your family and with this very learning of yours, do you think this should be thrown behind your back and neglected? As if you were worth less to yourself than the sound of your tongue, and offending the ears of God with ill-composed morals were a lighter thing than having the authority of grammar angry at your ill-composed syllables. You write: 'O if the dawn of old, with its gladdening wheels, would bring back to me the days we spent with you, trying out free leisure and the bright laws of the good in the midst of Italy and through the high mountains! Neither hard cold with hoary frost, nor fierce storm, nor the Zephyr and the roaring of the north wind would keep me from pressing on your footsteps with eager pace. Only bid me do this task.' Woe is me, if I do not bid, if I do not compel and command, if I do not ask and beg! But if your ears are closed against my voice, let them be open to your own mouth, open to your own poem; hear yourself, most hard, most cruel, most deaf! What use to me is a golden tongue with an iron heart? With what, not poems, but laments, could I be equal to bewailing your poems, in which I see what a soul, what a talent I am not allowed to lay hold of and offer to our God? You wait for me to bid you be good, be quiet, be happy; as if any day could dawn more welcome to me than one on which I might enjoy your talent in the Lord; or as if you really did not know that I hunger and thirst for you; or as if you did not confess it in this very poem. Recall the mind with which you wrote these things, and now say to me: 'Only bid me do this task.' Here is my bidding: give me yourself, if this is the only task; give yourself to my Lord, who is the Lord of us all, who gave you that talent. For what am I but your servant through him and your fellow servant under him?

### Translation notes

- The verses are lines 52–59 of Licentius's poem, given in full in 26.6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.4 (CSEL 34.1:86–87; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-4).

## Letter 26.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:87–88
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Christ's invitation to take his yoke and holds up Paulinus of Nola as an example of a gifted man who gave up worldly honour for Christ.

### Latin text

An ipse non iubet? audi euangelium. stabat, inquit, Iesus et clamabat: Venite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quoniam mitis sum et humilis corde, et inuenietis requiem animabus uestris, iugum enim meum lene est et sarcina mea leuis est. si haec non audiuntur aut usque ad aures audiuntur, expectasne, Licenti, ut Augustinus iubeat conseruo suo et non plangat potius frustra iubere dominum suum, immo non iubere, sed inuitare et rogare quodam modo, ut, qui laborant, reficiantur ab eo? sed uidelicet fortissimo et praefidenti collo iugum mundi iugo Christi est iucundius. qui si laborare nos cogeret, uide, quis cogeret, qua mercede cogeret. uade in Campaniam, disce Paulinum, egregium et sanctum dei seruum, quam grandem fastum saeculi huius tanto generosiore quanto humiliore ceruice incunctanter excusserit, ut eam subderet Christi iugo, sicut subdidit; et nunc illo moderatore itineris sui quietus et modestus exultat. uade, disce, quibus opibus ingenii sacrificia laudis ei offerat refundens illi, quicquid boni accepit ex illo, ne amittat omnia, si non in eo reponat, a quo haec habet.

### English translation (Claude)

Or does he not bid? Hear the gospel. 'Jesus stood,' it says, 'and cried out: Come to me, all you who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls; for my yoke is gentle and my burden is light.' If these words are not heard, or heard only as far as the ears, do you wait, Licentius, for Augustine to give orders to his fellow servant, rather than lament that his Lord gives orders in vain, or rather does not order, but invites and in a way asks, that those who labour may be refreshed by him? But clearly, to a very strong and overconfident neck the yoke of the world is more pleasant than the yoke of Christ. If he were compelling us to labour, see who would be compelling, and for what reward. Go to Campania, learn from Paulinus, that outstanding and holy servant of God, how unhesitatingly he shook off the great pride of this world, with a neck all the nobler for being humble, in order to put it under the yoke of Christ, as he has done; and now, with Christ guiding his journey, he exults quietly and modestly. Go and learn with what riches of talent he offers him sacrifices of praise, pouring back to him whatever good he has received from him, lest he lose all if he does not lay it up in him from whom he has it.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:28–30: quotation, high confidence
- John 7:37: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 13:15: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 11:28–30, introduced with words from John 7:37.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.5 (CSEL 34.1:87–88; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-5).

## Letter 26.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:88–95
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Licentius to give his golden talent to Christ rather than to his lusts, and appends Licentius's own poem, in which he asks Augustine's help with Varro, longs for their days together in Italy, and asks for his books on music.

### Latin text

Quid aestuas? quid fluctuas? quid imaginationibus mortiferarum uoluptatum aurem accommodas et auertis a nobis? mentiuntur, moriuntur, in mortem trahunt. mentiuntur, Licenti, sic nobis, sicuti optas, uerum ratione patescat, sic plus Eridano fluat. non dicit uerum nisi ueritas: Christus est ueritas; ueniamus ad eum, ne laboremus. ut ipse nos reficiat, tollamus iugum eius super nos et discamus ab eo, quoniam mitis est et humilis corde, et inueniemus requiem animis nostris. iugum enim eius lene est et sarcina eius leuis est. ornari abs te diabolus quaerit. si calicem aureum inuenisses in terra, donares illum ecclesiae dei. accepisti a deo ingenium spiritaliter aureum et ministras inde libidinibus et in illo satanae propinas te ipsum! noli, obsecro; sic aliquando sentias, quam misero et miserando pectore haec scripserim, et miserearis iam mei, si tibi uiluisti. Arcanum Varronis iter scrutando profundi mens hebet aduersamque fugit conterrita lucem. nec mirum; iacet omnis enim mea cura legendi te non dante manum et consurgere sola ueretur. nam simul ut perplexa uiri compendia tanti uoluere suasit amor sacrosque adtingere sensus, quis numerum dedit ille tonos mundumque Tonanti disseruit canere et pariles agitare choreas, implicuit uaria nostrum caligine pectus induxitque animo rerum uiolentia nubem; inde figurarum positas sine puluere formas posco amens aliasque graues offendo tenebras; ad summam astrorum causas clarosque meatus, obscuros quorum ille situs per nubila monstrat. sic iacui nutans, ut talem omnino ruinam nec qui nos prohibet latebras agnoscere caeli nec persona daret functorum freta cauernis. Protea namque ferunt ueterum commenta Pelasgum, qui dum sollicitis non uult aperire futura, spumat aper, fluit unda, fremit leo, sibilat anguis, captum aliquando tamen in munera parua uolucrum. at mihi, qui nimium curis grauioribus angor, dulcia quaeque animae, subdulcia pabula quaero, Varronis responsa latent. quod supplice cantu praesidium nymphamue rogem, quae flumina poscam? an te uoce uocem, clari quem rector Olympi fontibus infantum praefecit et abdita iussit ubertate animi longe ructare fluenta? ferto magister opem actutum, ne desere uires inualidas mecumque sacras subuertere glebas incipe; tempus enim, nisi me mortalia fallunt, labitur in seniumque trahit. tibi noster Apollo corda replet patremque suum patremque deorum conciliat legemque bonam pacemque cruentam monstrat et abducto uelamine singula pandit. uiginti emensus nam longos forsitan orbes solis eras, cum te ratio pulcherrima mundi ditior imperiis et nectare dulcior omni corripuit statuitque uagum medioque locauit, omnibus unde aciem posses intendere rebus. o bone, carpe iter annorum; sapientia quantum crescit amore sui inueniens noua culmina semper! perge uiam, qua te suboles praeclara Tonantis perducit sternens in planos ardua campos. et cum luciferos praecordia uesper in ortus distulerit sanctumque super benedixeris ignem, sis memor ipse mei. bibulam qui ponitis aurem legibus inuictis, contundite pectora palmis, sternite membra solo meritosque ciete dolores et prohibete nefas. deus imperat omnibus unum, admonet antistes uenturaque fulmina terrent. o mihi transactos reuocet si pristina soles laetificis aurora rotis, quos libera tecum otia temptantes et candida iura bonorum duximus Italiae medio montesque per altos! non me dura gelu prohiberent frigora cano nec fera tempestas Zephyrum fremitusque Borini, quin tua sollicito premerem uestigia passu. hoc opus ut iubeas tantum, cruor inriget artus, solstitio Neuros, bruma sectabimur Histrum. ignotus Garamas soluet mihi uincula gentis Exampeosque lacus fugiens Hypaneius amnis Callipidum Scythicas resonet spumosus ad undas. ibimus et Leucos, qua Leucia solis in ortus tenditur, et uasti deserta cacumina Cassi, quis Epidaphnaeas aequat sibi Cassia rupes, unde quiescentem auroram currusque solutos sopitamque diem media sub nocte uiderem, te suadente petam; nec enim labor aut metus ullus terret, ubi insontes precibus deus audit apertis. et nunc Romulidum sedes et inania Remi culmina bacchatasque domos uanosque tumultus desererem et totus semel in tua corda uenirem, ni mens coniugio incumbens retineret euntem. crede meis, o docte, malis ueroque dolori, quod sine te nullos promittunt carbasa portus erramusque procul turbata per aequora uitae, praecipites densa ueluti caligine nautae, quos furor australis stridens et flatus ab Euro perculit et raptis priuauit turbo magistris; protinus abruptis miseri uoluuntur in undis, non foras aut prorae, non lintea deinde procellas ferre ualent ratioque iacet stupefacta regendi: sic me uentus agit uoluuntque cupidinis aestus in mare letiferum. nec terrae protinus absunt, sed mecum reputans tua candida uerba, magister, haec magis esse reor tibi credere: callida res est, decipit atque animis molitur retia nostris. praeteritos oblitus enim, praesentia praesto nunc tibi cara, tuo nos non de pectore lapsi. ei mihi quo ferar, unde uelim tibi pandere mentem! ante sub Aegeo aptabunt pia tecta palumbes et uersa alcyone componat in arbore nidos, esuriens uitulos alat ante leaena sequaces atque inpasta diu teneros lupa nutriat agnos mutantesque suis diuisum partibus orbem aut Barcaeus aret Taurum aut Hyrcania Mauros, ante Thyesteis iterum male territa mensis interrupta dies refugos uanescat in ortus, ante dabunt imbres Nilum, super aethera dammae errabunt montesque canant et flumina laudent, quam mihi post tergum ueniant tua dona, magister. arcet amor copulamque tenet communis honesti. hic, hic regnat amicitiae decus hoste fugato. nam neque propter opes uitreas aurumque rebelle iungimus adsensus animorum; nam neque uulgi nos fortuna ruens, quae separat ardua, iunxit, sed labor interiora legens uulgata libellis atque animis inuenta tuis et nobile dogma indictum contraque bonos responsa relatus. et mea Calliope quamuis te comminus altum horreat et uultus abscondat inutile tractans, hoc tamen, hoc animi uinclum nexusque fideles non qui montosis firmatas rupibus Alpes fregit et Italicas pressit cum moenibus urbes, rumperet aut nostro tereret de robore quicquam. ite procul latices tumidis anfractibus orti aut ab Arimphaeis Ripheos aut oppida Caspi Cimmeriasque domos seiungere flumine largo Maeotidumque plagae et pontus quas obruit Helles Europae atque Asiae longe discrimina tendant. nonne boum per utrumque latus armenta fatigans finibus abscidit Talari Dodona Molossos,................ cognatosque Arabas? nec pacis foedus amicum Sidonios inter mansit regnumque Pelasgum sacrilegosque Phrygas, quamuis pro tempore cunctis hospitium commune fuit. quid denique fratrum discidium pugnasque canam? quid honesta parentum uerbera? quid matrum furias natosque superbos? est etiam superum concors discordia rerum totque fluunt ritus, quot dat sententia leges. nos tenet unus amor. non si mihi murmura centum det Boreas totidemque animas centumque per ora lingua rigens adamante fremat, memorare queamus, quae sociata prius ueterum natura locorum distulit et tereti limauit gloria mundo. sed nos, praeterea quod ab una exsurgimus urbe, quod domus una tulit, quod sanguine tinguimur uno saeclorum, christiana fides conexuit; et quod nos iter inmensum disterminat et plaga ponti interfusa cohercet, amor contemnit utrumque, gaudia qui spernens oculorum semper amico absenti fruitur, quoniam de corde profundo pendet et internae rimatur pabula fibrae. interea uenient quaecumque futura bonorum scripta salutiferi sermonis et illa priorum aequiperanda fanis, reputans quae pectore in alto conceptum in lucem uomuisti nectareum mel, praesentem ipsa mihi te reddent, si mihi morem gesseris et libros, quibus in te lenta recumbit musica, tradideris; nam ferueo totus in illos. adnue, sic nobis uerum ratione patescat, sic plus Eridano fluat et contagia mundi nequiquam uolitent nostri circum arua coloni.

### English translation (Claude)

Why do you surge? Why do you waver? Why do you lend your ear to the imaginings of deadly pleasures and turn it away from us? They lie, they die, they drag into death. They lie, Licentius, as surely as you pray, 'so may truth be opened to us by reason, so may it flow more fully than the Eridanus.' No one speaks the truth but the Truth: Christ is the Truth; let us come to him, so that we may not labour. That he may refresh us, let us take his yoke upon us and learn from him, for he is meek and humble of heart, and we shall find rest for our souls. For his yoke is gentle and his burden light. The devil seeks to be adorned by you. If you had found a golden chalice in the earth, you would give it to the church of God. You have received from God a talent that is spiritually golden, and with it you serve your lusts, and in it you drink yourself to Satan! Do not, I implore you; so may you one day feel with what a wretched and pitiable heart I have written these things, and have pity on me now, if you have become worthless to yourself.

While I search out the secret path of profound Varro, my mind grows dull and flees in terror from the light that confronts it. No wonder; for all my care for reading lies prostrate without you to lend a hand, and alone it fears to rise. For as soon as love persuaded me to unroll the intricate abridgements of so great a man and to touch his sacred meanings (by what number he taught the Thunderer's tones and the world to sing and move in equal dances), the violence of the matter wrapped my heart in manifold darkness and brought a cloud over my mind. Then, mad, I demand the forms of figures laid down without the sand, and stumble upon other heavy darkness; and finally upon the causes of the stars and their bright courses, whose positions he shows obscure, as through clouds. So I lay faltering, in such ruin as neither he who forbids us to know the hiding places of heaven would cause, nor the mask that gives the dead their straits from caverns. For the inventions of the old Pelasgians tell of Proteus, who, unwilling to reveal the future to anxious enquirers, foams as a boar, flows as water, roars as a lion, hisses as a serpent, yet once caught gives way at last for the small gifts of birds. But to me, who am tormented by heavier cares and seek every sweetness for the soul, half-sweet pastures, the answers of Varro lie hidden. With what suppliant song should I ask for help, which nymph should I beseech, what rivers should I invoke? Or should I call with my voice on you, whom the ruler of bright Olympus set over the springs of infants and bade pour forth far and wide the hidden streams of a rich mind? Bring help, master, at once; do not abandon my feeble strength, and begin with me to turn up the sacred clods; for time, unless mortal things deceive me, glides away and drags toward old age. For you our Apollo fills the heart, reconciles his Father, the Father of the gods, shows the good law and the bloody peace, and, drawing aside the veil, opens each thing. For you had perhaps traversed twenty long circuits of the sun when the most beautiful reason of the world, richer than empires and sweeter than any nectar, seized you, steadied you in your wandering, and placed you in the midst, from where you could direct your gaze on all things. O good man, pluck the road of the years; how wisdom grows by love of itself, ever finding new heights! Go on along the way by which the glorious offspring of the Thunderer leads you, levelling the steep into plains. And when evening has put off your heart until the light-bringing dawn, and you have blessed the holy fire above, be mindful of me. You who lend a thirsty ear to unconquered laws, beat your breasts with your palms, throw your limbs on the ground, stir up deserved griefs, and forbid wickedness. God commands one thing to all, the high priest admonishes, and the thunderbolts to come terrify.

O if the dawn of old, with its gladdening wheels, would bring back to me the days we spent with you, trying out free leisure and the bright laws of the good in the midst of Italy and through the high mountains! Neither hard cold with hoary frost, nor fierce storm, nor the Zephyr and the roaring of the north wind would keep me from pressing on your footsteps with eager pace. Only bid me do this task: though blood should drench my limbs, at midsummer we will follow the Neuri, in midwinter the Hister. The unknown Garamantian will loose for me the bonds of his race, and the river Hypanis, fleeing the Exampaean lakes, may resound in foam to the Scythian waves of the Callipidae. We will go even to the Leuci, where Leucia stretches toward the sunrise, and to the desert peaks of vast Cassius, in which Cassia rivals the Epidaphnean cliffs, from where I might see the dawn at rest, the chariot unyoked, and the day asleep in the middle of the night; at your urging I will seek them, for no labour or fear terrifies where God hears the innocent, open to their prayers. And even now I would desert the seat of Romulus's sons, the empty roofs of Remus, the houses full of revelling and vain tumults, and come once and for all wholly into your heart, did not a mind bent on marriage hold me back as I go. Believe my ills, O learned one, and my true grief: without you the sails promise no harbour, and we wander far over the troubled seas of life, like sailors headlong in thick darkness, whom the shrieking fury of the south wind and the blast from Eurus have struck, and the whirlwind has robbed of their pilots, snatched away; at once the wretches are rolled in broken waves; neither the decks nor the prows, nor then the sails can bear the storms, and the skill of steering lies stunned: so the wind drives me and the surges of desire roll me into the deadly sea. Nor is land far off; but, pondering your bright words with myself, master, I think rather that this must be entrusted to you: it is a cunning thing, it deceives and weaves nets for our minds. You have forgotten the past and now hold the present dear; yet we have not slipped from your heart. Alas, where am I borne? from where would I open my mind to you! Sooner will doves fit their pious roofs beneath the Aegean, and the halcyon build her nest in an upturned tree; sooner will a hungry lioness feed the calves that follow her, and a she-wolf long unfed nurse tender lambs, and, the world divided into its parts exchanging places, the Barcaean plough the Taurus or Hyrcania the land of the Moors; sooner will the day, interrupted and again terrified by the banquet of Thyestes, vanish into the retreating dawn; sooner will rains produce the Nile, deer wander above the sky, and mountains sing and rivers praise, than your gifts, master, fall behind me. Love prevents it, and holds the bond of a common good. Here, here reigns the glory of friendship, the enemy put to flight. For it is not for glassy riches or rebellious gold that we join the assent of our minds; nor did the crashing fortune of the crowd, which separates the lofty, join us; but the labour of reading the inner matters made public in books and found by your minds, and the noble doctrine not yet proclaimed, and the replies brought against the good. And though my Calliope dreads you, lofty as you are, at close quarters and hides her face, busy with useless things, yet this bond of mind, these faithful ties, not even he who broke the Alps, made firm with mountain rocks, and crushed the cities of Italy with their walls, could break, or wear away any of our strength. Go far off, you waters risen in swelling windings, whether to divide the Ripheans from the Arimphaeans, or the towns of the Caspian and the Cimmerian homes with a broad river; and let the regions of the Maeotians and the sea that overwhelmed Helle stretch far the boundaries of Europe and Asia. Did not Dodona, wearying herds of oxen on either side, cut off the Molossians from the bounds of Talarus, … and the kindred Arabs? Nor did the friendly treaty of peace remain between the Sidonians, the kingdom of the Pelasgians and the sacrilegious Phrygians, although for a time all had shared a common hospitality. Why, finally, should I sing of the quarrels and battles of brothers? why the honourable blows of parents? why the fury of mothers and proud sons? There is even a harmonious discord in the affairs of the gods above, and as many rites flow as opinion gives laws. One love holds us. Not if Boreas gave me a hundred murmurs and as many breaths, and a tongue stiff with adamant roared through a hundred mouths, could we recount the things which nature first joined and then the glory of ancient places put asunder and polished for the rounded world. But we, besides the fact that we rise from one city, that one house bore us, that we are tinged with one blood of the ages, have been bound together by the Christian faith; and as for the immense journey that divides us and the stretch of sea poured between that confines us, love despises both; scorning the joys of the eyes, it always enjoys the absent friend, since it hangs from the depth of the heart and searches the pastures of the inmost fibres. Meanwhile, whatever writings of saving discourse are yet to come, and those worthy to be set beside the shrines of the ancients, which, pondering in the depth of your breast what you had conceived, you have poured out into the light like nectared honey, will themselves make you present to me, if you will humour me and hand over the books in which music lies at rest in you; for I am all aflame for them. Grant it: so may truth be opened to us by reason, so may it flow more fully than the Eridanus, and so may the contagions of the world flutter in vain around the fields of our farmer.

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:28–30: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Varro (Varro): allusion, medium confidence
- Virgil, Aen. 6.625 (Virgil): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The poem (154 hexameters in the edition) is by Licentius, addressed to Augustine; NPNF omits it. Licentius writes in pagan poetic diction: 'the Thunderer' and 'the Father of the gods' are God, 'our Apollo' is Christ. Several lines are obscure or corrupt and are translated by sense (the 'mask' and the 'straits from caverns', the 'gifts of birds' given to Proteus, the 'replies brought against the good'); a gap in the poem is marked '…'. 'He who broke the Alps' is Hannibal; the Hister is the Danube; the Eridanus is the Po. The books on music are Augustine's On Music. 'A hundred mouths' echoes Virgil, Aeneid 6.625. The edition's line numbers, which had leaked into the text, are removed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 26.6 (CSEL 34.1:88–95; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/24-1/#p-26-6).

## Letter 27.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:95–97
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine's first letter to Paulinus of Nola: he grieves that he has not seen the friend whose soul he already knows through his letter.

### Latin text

O bone uir et bone frater, latebas animam meam. et ei dico, ut toleret, quod adhuc lates oculos meos; et uix mihi obtemperat, immo non obtemperat. an uero tolerat? cur ergo me excruciat desiderium tui apud ipsam intus animam? nam si molestias corporis paterer et si non perturbarent aequitatem animi mei, recte illas tolerare dicerer; cum autem non aequo animo fero, quod te non uideo, intolerabile est istam appellare tolerantiam. sed quando tu talis es, esse sine te fortasse intolerabilius toleraretur. bene est ergo, quia aequo animo ferre non possum, quod si aequo animo ferrem, aequo animo ferendus non essem. mirum est, sed tamen uerum, quod mihi accidit: doleo, quod te non uideo, et me ipse consolatur dolor. ita mihi displicet fortitudo, qua patienter fertur absentia bonorum, sicuti es. nam et Hierusalem futuram desideramus utique et, quanto inpatientius desideramus ipsam, tanto patientius sustinemus omnia propter ipsam. quis igitur potest non gaudere te uiso, ut posset, quamdiu te non uidet, non dolere? ergo neutrum possum et, quoniam, si possem, immaniter possem, non posse delector atque in eo, quod delector, nonnullum solatium est. dolentem itaque me non sedatus, sed consideratus consolatur dolor. ne reprehendas, quaeso, sanctiore grauitate, qua praeuales, et dicas non recte me dolere, quod adhuc te non nouerim, cum animum mihi tuum, hoc est te ipsum interiorem aspiciendum patefeceris. quid enim? si uspiam te uel in terrena tua ciuitate didicissem fratrem et dilectorem meum et tantum in domino ac talem uirum, nullumne me dolorem sensurum fuisse arbitrareris, si non sinerer nosse domum tuam? quo modo ergo non doleam, quod nondum faciem tuam noui, hoc est domum animae tuae, quam sicut meam noui?

### English translation (Claude)

O good man and good brother, you were hidden from my soul. And I tell it to bear patiently that you are still hidden from my eyes; and it scarcely obeys me, or rather it does not obey. Or does it bear it? Why then does longing for you torment me within my very soul? For if I suffered bodily troubles and they did not disturb the evenness of my mind, I would rightly be said to bear them; but since I do not bear with an even mind that I do not see you, it is unbearable to call this bearing. But since you are such as you are, to be without you and bear it would perhaps be more unbearable still. It is well, then, that I cannot bear it with an even mind; for if I bore it with an even mind, I would not deserve to be borne with an even mind. What has happened to me is strange, but true: I grieve that I do not see you, and the grief itself consoles me. So I dislike the fortitude with which the absence of good men such as you is patiently borne. For we certainly long for the Jerusalem to come, and the more impatiently we long for it, the more patiently we endure all things for its sake. Who, then, can fail to rejoice at seeing you, so as to be able not to grieve as long as he does not see you? So I can do neither, and, since if I could I would be monstrous, I am glad that I cannot, and in being glad there is some consolation. So, though I grieve, my grief consoles me, not by being calmed but by being considered. Do not rebuke me, I beg, with the holier gravity in which you excel, and say that I do wrong to grieve that I do not yet know you, when you have opened your mind to me, that is, your inner self, to look upon. What then? If anywhere, even in your earthly city, I had learned of you as my brother and one who loves me, and so great and such a man in the Lord, would you think I would feel no grief if I were not allowed to know your house? How then should I not grieve that I do not yet know your face, that is, the house of your soul, which I know as I know my own?

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Paulinus (later bishop of Nola), answering letter 25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.1 (CSEL 34.1:95–97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-1).

## Letter 27.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:97–98
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Paulinus's letter, his renunciation of the world, and his wife Therasia, now living with him in spiritual partnership.

### Latin text

Legi enim litteras tuas fluentes lac et mel, praeferentes simplicitatem cordis tui, in qua quaeris dominum sentiens de illo in bonitate, et adferentes ei claritatem et honorem. legerunt fratres et gaudent infatigabiliter et ineffabiliter tam uberibus et tam excellentibus donis dei, bonis tuis. quotquot eas legerunt, rapiunt, quia rapiuntur, cum legunt. quam suauis odor Christi et quam fraglat ex eis, dici non potest. illae litterae cum te offerunt, ut uidearis, quantum nos excitant, ut quaeraris! nam et perspicabilem faciunt et desiderabilem. quanto enim praesentiam tuam nobis quodam modo exhibent, tanto absentiam nos ferre non sinunt. amant te omnes in eis et amari abs te cupiunt. laudatur et benedicitur deus, cuius gratia talis es. ibi excitatur Christus, ut uentos et maria tibi placare dignetur tendenti ad stabilitatem suam. uidetur a legentibus ibi coniunx non dux ad mollitiem uiro suo, sed ad fortitudinem redux in ossa uiri sui, quam in tuam unitatem redactam et redditam et spiritalibus tibi tanto firmioribus, quanto castioribus nexibus copulatam officiis uestrae sanctitati debitis in te uno resalutamus. ibi cedri Libani ad terram depositae et in arcae fabricam compagine caritatis erectae mundi huius fluctus inputribiliter secant; ibi gloria, ut adquiratur, contemnitur et mundus, ut obtineatur, relinquitur; ibi paruuli siue etiam grandiusculi filii Babylonis eliduntur ad petram, uitia scilicet confusionis superbiaeque saecularis.

### English translation (Claude)

For I have read your letter flowing with milk and honey, displaying the simplicity of your heart, in which you seek the Lord, thinking of him in goodness, and bringing him glory and honour. The brothers have read it and rejoice tirelessly and inexpressibly at such abundant and excellent gifts of God, your good gifts. All who have read it snatch it away, because they are carried away when they read it. How sweet is the fragrance of Christ that breathes from it, words cannot say. That letter, in offering you to be seen, how much it rouses us to seek you! For it makes you both visible and desirable. The more it shows us your presence in a way, the less it allows us to bear your absence. All love you in it and desire to be loved by you. God is praised and blessed, by whose grace you are such. There Christ is roused to deign to calm the winds and seas for you as you make your way toward his stability. There readers see a wife who does not lead her husband to softness but is led back to strength, into the bones of her husband; brought back and restored into unity with you, and joined to you by spiritual bonds all the firmer for being chaster, she is greeted by us in return in you alone, with the respects due to your holiness. There the cedars of Lebanon, laid on the ground and raised up by the joinery of love into the building of the ark, cut through the waves of this world without decay; there glory is despised that it may be gained, and the world left that it may be won; there the little ones, or even the somewhat older children of Babylon, are dashed against the rock, namely the vices of confusion and worldly pride.

### Scripture references

- Exod 3:8: echo, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 2:15: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:26: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 2:23: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 137:9 (136:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 1:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Thinking of him in goodness ... simplicity of heart' quotes Wis 1:1. The wife is Therasia, who with Paulinus had adopted a life of continence. 'Into the bones of her husband' recalls Gen 2:23. Allusions also to Exod 3:8; 2 Cor 2:15; Matt 8:26; Ps 137:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.2 (CSEL 34.1:97–98; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-2).

## Letter 27.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:98–99
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he cannot believe Paulinus's praise of him but gladly believes his love, and gives himself wholly to him, asking for his prayers.

### Latin text

Haec atque huius modi suauissima et sacratissima spectacula litterae tuae praebent legentibus, litterae illae, litterae fidei non fictae, litterae spei bonae, litterae purae caritatis. quo modo nobis anhelant sitim tuam et desiderium defectumque animae tuae in atria domini! quid amoris sanctissimi spirant! quantam opulentiam sinceri cordis exaestuant! quas agunt gratias deo! quas impetrant a deo! blandiores sunt, an ardentiores? luminosiores, an fecundiores? quid est enim, quod ita nos mulcent, ita accendunt, ita compluunt et ita serenae sunt? quid est, quaeso te, aut quid tibi pro eis rependam, nisi quia totus sum tuus in eo, cuius totus es tu? si parum est, plus certe non habeo; tu autem fecisti, ut non mihi uideatur parum, qui me in illa epistula tantis laudibus honorare dignatus es, ut, cum tibi me refundo, si parum hoc putem, tibi non credidisse conuincar. pudet me quidem tantum boni de me credere, sed plus piget tibi non credere. est, quod faciam. non me credam talem, qualem putas, quoniam non agnosco, et credam me abs te diligi, quoniam sentio et plane percipio. ita nec in me temerarius nec in te ingratus extitero. et cum me tibi totum offero, parum non est; offero enim, quem uehementissime diligis, et offero, si non qualem me esse arbitraris, eum tamen, pro quo, ut talis esse merear, deprecaris. hoc enim magis iam peto facias, ne minus optes mihi adici ad id, quod sum, dum me existimas iam esse, quod non sum.

### English translation (Claude)

These and other such most sweet and most holy sights your letter offers its readers: that letter, a letter of unfeigned faith, a letter of good hope, a letter of pure love. How it breathes out to us your thirst, and the longing and fainting of your soul for the courts of the Lord! What a most holy love it exhales! What wealth of a sincere heart it pours forth! What thanks it gives to God! What it obtains from God! Is it more gentle or more ardent? More luminous or more fruitful? What is it that so soothes us, so kindles us, so rains on us, and yet is so serene? What is it, I ask you, or what shall I repay you for it, except that I am wholly yours in him whose you are wholly? If this is little, I certainly have no more; but you have made it seem not little to me, since you deigned to honour me in that letter with such praises that, in giving myself back to you, if I thought this little, I would be convicted of not having believed you. I am ashamed indeed to believe so much good about myself, but I am more reluctant not to believe you. There is something I can do. I will not believe myself such as you think, since I do not recognize it, and I will believe that I am loved by you, since I feel it and plainly perceive it. In this way I shall be neither rash about myself nor ungrateful to you. And when I offer myself wholly to you, it is not little; for I offer one whom you love most ardently, and I offer, if not such a one as you think me, yet one for whom you pray that he may deserve to be such. For this I now ask you to do even more, lest you wish less to be added to what I am, while you think that I already am what I am not.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 1:5: echo, medium confidence
- Ps 84:2 (83:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Echoes of 1 Tim 1:5 and Ps 84:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.3 (CSEL 34.1:98–99; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-3).

## Letter 27.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:99–100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine introduces the bearer, his friend Romanianus, warns Paulinus not to trust his praise, and asks him to pray for his faults, since whatever is good in his books is God's.

### Latin text

Ecce carissimus meus est et ab ineunte adulescentia mihi familiariter amicissimus, qui hanc eximietati tuae ac praestantissimae caritati epistulam adportat. huius nomen est in libro de religione, quem tua sanctitas, quantum litteris indicas, libentissime legit; factus enim tibi etiam tanti uiri, qui tibi eum misit, commendatione iucundior. neque huic tamen tam familiari amico meo uelim credas, quae de me forte laudans dixerit. sensi enim etiam ipsum saepe non mentiendi studio, sed amandi propensione falli iudicantem et arbitrari iam me accepisse quaedam, quibus accipiendis a domino patente ore cordis inhiarem. et si hoc in os meum, quis non coniciat, quanta de me absente meliora quam ueriora laetus effundat? librorum autem nostrorum copiam faciet uenerabili studio suo; nam nescio me aliquid siue ad eorum, qui extra ecclesiam dei sunt, siue ad aures fratrum scripsisse, quod ipse non habeat. sed tu cum legis, mi sancte Pauline, non te ita rapiant, quae per nostram infirmitatem ueritas loquitur, ut ea, quae ipse loquor, minus diligenter aduertas, ne, dum auidus hauris bona et recta, quae data ministro, non ores pro peccatis et erratis, quae ipse committo. in his enim, quae tibi recte, si aduerteris, displicebunt, ego ipse conspicior, in his autem, quae per donum spiritus, quod accepisti, recte tibi placent in libris meis, ille amandus, ille praedicandus est, apud quem est fons uitae et in cuius lumine uidebimus lumen sine aenigmate et facie ad faciem, nunc autem in aenigmate uidemus. in his ergo, quae ipse de ueteri fermento eructaui, cum ea legens agnosco, me iudico cum dolore; in his uero, quae de azymo sinceritatis et ueritatis dono dei dixi, exulto cum tremore. quid enim habemus, quod non accepimus? at enim melior est, qui maioribus et pluribus quam qui minoribus et paucioribus donis dei diues est. quis negat? sed rursus melius est uel de paruo dei dono gratias ipsi agere quam sibi agi uelle de magno. haec ut ex animo semper confitear meumque cor a lingua mea non dissonet, ora pro me, frater; ora, obsecro, ut non laudari uolens, sed laudans inuocem dominum, et ab inimicis meis saluus ero.

### English translation (Claude)

See, he who brings this letter to Your Excellency and your most excellent Love is very dear to me and has been my close friend from early youth. His name is in the book On Religion, which Your Holiness, as you indicate in your letter, reads with great pleasure; for it has become all the more pleasing to you by the commendation of so great a man, who sent it to you. Yet I would not want you to believe what this so intimate friend of mine may perhaps say in praise of me. For I have noticed that he too often errs in his judgment, not from a desire to lie but from a bent to love, and thinks that I have already received certain things which I gape for with the open mouth of my heart to receive from the Lord. And if he does this to my face, who would not guess how many things, better than true, he joyfully pours out about me when I am absent? He will provide your venerable zeal with a supply of our books; for I do not know that I have written anything, either for the ears of those outside the church of God or for the brothers, that he does not have. But when you read, my holy Paulinus, do not let the things which truth speaks through our weakness so carry you away that you attend less carefully to the things I speak myself, lest, while you eagerly drink in the good and right things given me to minister, you fail to pray for the sins and errors that I myself commit. For in the things that will rightly displease you, if you notice them, I myself am seen; but in the things in my books that rightly please you through the gift of the Spirit you have received, he is to be loved, he is to be proclaimed, with whom is the fountain of life, and in whose light we shall see light without a riddle and face to face, whereas now we see in a riddle. In the things, then, which I myself belched up from the old leaven, when I recognize them on reading, I judge myself with grief; but in those which by the gift of God I spoke from the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth, I exult with trembling. For what do we have that we have not received? But, you say, one who is rich in greater and more gifts of God is better than one rich in lesser and fewer. Who denies it? But again, it is better to give thanks to him even for a small gift of God than to wish to be thanked oneself for a great one. Pray for me, brother, that I may always confess these things from the heart and that my heart may not be out of tune with my tongue; pray, I implore you, that, not wishing to be praised but praising, I may call upon the Lord, and I shall be saved from my enemies.

### Scripture references

- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:8: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 2:11: echo, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 18:3 (17:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The bearer is Romanianus, to whom On True Religion refers. Allusions: Ps 36:9 (LXX 35:10); 1 Cor 13:12; 1 Cor 5:8; 1 Cor 4:7; Ps 2:11; quotation of Ps 18:3 (LXX 17:4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.4 (CSEL 34.1:99–100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-4).

## Letter 27.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:100–101
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the bearer is a relative of Alypius, promises to write Alypius's story himself, and commends the bearer to Paulinus's spiritual counsel.

### Latin text

Est etiam aliud, quo istum fratrem amplius diligas; nam est cognatus uenerabilis et uere beati episcopi Alypii, quem toto pectore amplecteris et merito. nam quisquis de illo uiro benigne cogitat, de magna dei misericordia et de mirabilibus dei muneribus cogitat. itaque cum legisset petitionem tuam, qua desiderare te indicasti, ut historiam suam tibi scribat, et uolebat facere propter beniuolentiam tuam et nolebat propter uerecundiam suam. quem cum uiderem inter amorem pudoremque fluctuantem, onus ab illo in umeros meos transtuli; nam hoc mihi etiam per epistulam iussit. cito ergo, si dominus adiuuerit, totum Alypium inseram praecordiis tuis; nam hoc sum ego maxime ueritus, ne ille uereretur aperire omnia, quae in eum dominus contulit, ne alicui minus intellegenti — non enim abs te solo illa legerentur — non diuina munera concessa hominibus, sed se ipsum praedicare uideretur et tu, qui nosti, quo modo haec legas, propter aliorum cauendam infirmitatem fraternae notitiae debito fraudareris. quod iam fecissem iamque illum legeres, nisi profectio fratris inprouisa repente placuisset, quem sic commendo cordi et linguae tuae, ut ita comiter ei te praebeas, quasi non nunc illum, sed mecum ante didiceris. si enim cordi tuo non dubitauerit aperire se ipsum, aut ex omni aut ex magna parte sanabitur per linguam tuam. uolo enim eum numerosius contundi eorum uocibus, qui amicum non saeculariter diligunt.

### English translation (Claude)

There is also another reason for you to love this brother more; for he is a relative of the venerable and truly blessed bishop Alypius, whom you embrace with your whole heart, and rightly. For whoever thinks kindly of that man thinks of the great mercy of God and of God's wonderful gifts. So when Alypius had read your request, in which you indicated that you wanted him to write his story for you, he both wished to do it because of your goodwill and did not wish to because of his modesty. When I saw him wavering between love and shame, I transferred the burden from him to my own shoulders; for he ordered me to do this too by letter. Soon, then, if the Lord helps, I shall put the whole Alypius into your heart. For what I feared most was that he would be afraid to disclose all that the Lord has bestowed on him, lest to someone less understanding (for it would not be read by you alone) he might seem to proclaim not divine gifts granted to men but himself; and that you, who know how to read these things, might be cheated of what brotherly acquaintance owes you, for the sake of guarding against the weakness of others. I would have done this already and you would be reading him now, had not this brother's departure suddenly been decided, unexpectedly. I commend him so to your heart and tongue that you may show yourself as friendly to him as if you had come to know him not now but long ago, together with me. For if he does not hesitate to open himself to your heart, he will be healed wholly or in great part through your tongue. For I want him to be struck more often by the voices of those who love a friend not in a worldly way.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's account of Alypius is found in Confessions 6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.5 (CSEL 34.1:100–101; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-5).

## Letter 27.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:101–103
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends to Paulinus Romanianus's son Licentius, whose poem and Augustine's letter (letter 26) show his danger, and asks Paulinus to correct Augustine's own writings.

### Latin text

Filium autem eius, filium nostrum, cuius etiam nomen in aliquibus nostris libris inuenies, etsi ad tuae caritatis praesentiam ipse non pergeret, statueram litteris in manum tuam tradere consolandum, exhortandum, instruendum non tam oris sono quam exemplo roboris tui. ardeo quippe, ut, dum adhuc aetas eius in uiridi faeno est, zizania conuertat in frugem et credat expertis, quod experiri periculose desiderat. nunc ergo ex eius carmine et ex epistula, quam ad eum misi, intellegit beniuolentissima et mansuetissima prudentia tua, quid de illo doleam, quid timeam, quid cupiam. nec despero adfuturum dominum, ut per te ministrum eius tantis curarum aestibus liberer. sane quia multa scripta nostra lecturus es, multo mihi erit gratior dilectio tua, si ex his, quae tibi displicuerint, emendaueris me iustus in misericordia et argueris me. non enim talis es, cuius oleo timeam inpinguari caput meum. fratres non solum qui nobiscum habitant et qui habitantes ubi libet deo pariter seruiunt, sed prope omnes, qui nos in Christo libenter nouerunt, salutant, uenerantur, desiderant germanitatem, beatitatem, humanitatem tuam. non audeo petere, sed si tibi ab ecclesiasticis muneribus uacat, uides, quid mecum sitiat Africa.

### English translation (Claude)

His son, our son, whose name you will also find in some of our books, I had decided to hand over into your hands by letter, even if he were not going himself into the presence of your Love, to be consoled, exhorted and instructed not so much by the sound of your mouth as by the example of your strength. For I burn with desire that, while his age is still the green blade, he may turn the tares into grain and believe those who have experienced what he dangerously desires to experience. Now then, from his poem and from the letter I sent him, your most kind and gentle prudence will understand what I grieve over in him, what I fear, and what I desire. Nor do I despair that the Lord will be present, so that through you, his minister, I may be freed from such great surges of anxiety. Indeed, since you are going to read many of our writings, your love will be much more welcome to me if, in what displeases you, you correct me, a righteous man in mercy, and rebuke me. For you are not such that I need fear having my head anointed with your oil. The brothers, not only those who live with us and those who live wherever they may and serve God equally, but almost all who know us gladly in Christ, greet, revere and long for Your Brotherliness, Blessedness and Kindness. I do not dare to ask, but if you have leisure from church duties, you see what Africa thirsts for along with me.

### Scripture references

- Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:25: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The son is Licentius (see letter 26). Allusion to Ps 141:5 (LXX 140:5) and to the parable of the tares (Matt 13:24–30).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 27.6 (CSEL 34.1:101–103; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-27-6).

## Letter 28.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:103–105
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine's first letter to Jerome: he says he knows Jerome through his writings and through Alypius, and commends the bearer Profuturus.

### Latin text

Numquam aeque quisquam facie cuilibet innotuit quam mihi tuorum in domino studiorum quieta laetitia et uere exercitatio liberalis. quamquam ergo percupiam omnino te nosse, tamen exiguum quiddam tui minus habeo, praesentiam uidelicet corporis. quam ipsam etiam, posteaquam te beatissimus nunc episcopus tunc uero iam episcopatu dignus frater Alypius uidit remeansque a me uisus est, negare non possum magna ex parte mihi esse relatu eius inpressam et ante reditum, cum te ille ibi uidebat, ego uidebam sed oculis eius. non enim animo me atque illum sed corpore duos, qui nouerit, dixerit, concordia dum taxat et familiaritate fidissima, non meritis, quibus ille antecellit. quia ergo me primitus communione spiritus, quo in unum nitimur, deinde illius ex ore iam diligis, nequaquam inpudenter quasi aliquis ignotus commendo germanitati tuae fratrem Profuturum, quem nostris conatibus, deinde adiutorio tuo uere profuturum speramus, nisi forte quod talis est, ut ipse tibi per eum fiam commendatior quam ille per me. hactenus fortasse scribere debuerim, si esse uellem epistularum sollemnium more contentus. sed scatet animus in loquelas communicandas tecum de studiis nostris, quae habemus in Christo Iesu domino nostro, qui nobis multas utilitates et uiatica quaedam demonstrati a se itineris etiam per tuam caritatem non mediocriter ministrare dignatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Never has anyone become known to anyone by his face as well as the quiet joy and truly liberal exercise of your studies in the Lord has become known to me. Although, then, I greatly desire to know you altogether, I lack only a small part of you, namely the presence of your body. And even this, after our brother Alypius, now a most blessed bishop but then already worthy of the episcopate, saw you and on his return was seen by me, I cannot deny has been largely imprinted on me by his account; and even before his return, when he was seeing you there, I was seeing you, but with his eyes. For whoever knows us would say that he and I are two in body but not in mind, that is, in harmony and most faithful friendship, not in merits, in which he excels. Since, then, you love me first through the communion of the Spirit, by which we strive toward unity, and then from his mouth, I do not at all impudently, as though I were unknown, commend to Your Brotherliness our brother Profuturus, who we hope will truly be profitable, through our efforts and then through your help; unless perhaps he is such that I shall become more commended to you through him than he through me. Perhaps I ought to have written only so far, if I wished to be content with the manner of formal letters. But my mind overflows with things to share with you in conversation about our studies, which we have in Christ Jesus our Lord, who deigns to minister to us, even through your love, not a few benefits and provisions, as it were, for the journey he has shown us.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Jerome (the address is not printed in the digital text). 'Profitable' plays on the name Profuturus ('one who will be of profit').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 28.1 (CSEL 34.1:103–105; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-1).

## Letter 28.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:105–107
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to translate the Greek commentators on Scripture, but not to make new Latin versions from the Hebrew, except with critical signs showing differences from the Septuagint.

### Latin text

Petimus ergo et nobiscum petit omnis Africanarum ecclesiarum studiosa societas, ut interpretandis eorum libris, qui graece scripturas nostras quam optime tractauerunt, curam atque operam inpendere non graueris. potes enim efficere, ut nos quoque habeamus tales illos uiros et unum potissimum, quem tu libentius in tuis litteris sonas. de uertendis autem in linguam latinam sanctis litteris canonicis laborare te nollem, nisi eo modo, quo Iob interpretatus es, ut signis adhibitis, quid inter hanc tuam et LXX, quorum est grauissima auctoritas, interpretationem distet, appareat. satis autem nequeo mirari, si aliquid adhuc in hebraeis exemplaribus inuenitur, quod tot interpretes illius linguae peritissimos fugerit. omitto enim LXX, de quorum uel consilii uel spiritus maiore concordia, quam si unus homo esset, non audeo in aliquam partem certam ferre sententiam, nisi quod eis praeminentem auctoritatem in hoc munere sine controuersia tribuendam existimo. illi me plus mouent, qui, cum posteriores interpretarentur et uerborum locutionumque hebraearum uiam atque regulas mordacius, ut fertur, tenerent, non solum inter se non consenserunt, sed etiam reliquerunt multa, quae tanto post eruenda et prodenda remanerent. si enim obscura sunt, te quoque in eis falli posse creditur; si manifesta, illos in eis falli potuisse non creditur. huius igitur rei pro tua caritate expositis causis certum me facias obsecrauerim.

### English translation (Claude)

We ask, then, and the whole studious fellowship of the African churches asks with us, that you not be reluctant to spend care and labour on translating the books of those who have treated our Scriptures best in Greek. For you can bring it about that we too may have those men, and especially one whose name you sound most willingly in your writings. But I would not want you to labour at turning the holy canonical writings into the Latin tongue, except in the way you translated Job, so that by the addition of signs it may appear how this translation of yours differs from that of the Seventy, whose authority is the weightiest. I cannot wonder enough if anything is still found in the Hebrew copies that has escaped so many translators most skilled in that language. For I leave aside the Seventy, about whose harmony, whether of counsel or of spirit, greater than if they had been one man, I do not dare to give a definite opinion either way, except that I think pre-eminent authority must be granted to them in this task without dispute. Those move me more who translated later and, as is said, held more tenaciously to the way and rules of Hebrew words and expressions, yet not only did not agree among themselves but also left many things which remained to be dug out and published so long afterward. For if these things are obscure, it is believed that you too can be mistaken in them; if they are clear, it is not believed that those men could have been mistaken in them. I would implore you, then, of your love, to set out the reasons for this and make me certain.

### Translation notes

- The Greek writer Jerome names most willingly is Origen. Jerome's version of Job from the Greek used Origen's critical signs. Augustine's reserve about translation from the Hebrew is stated as written; it opens the long correspondence between the two.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 28.2 (CSEL 34.1:105–107; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-2).

## Letter 28.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:107–108
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine objects to Jerome's commentary on Galatians, which explains the clash between Paul and Peter as a staged pretence, arguing that admitting any lie in Scripture would destroy its authority.

### Latin text

Legi etiam quaedam scripta, quae tua dicerentur, in epistulas apostoli Pauli, quarum ad Galatas cum enodare uelles, uenit in manus locus ille, quo apostolus Petrus a perniciosa simulatione reuocatur. ibi patrocinium mendacii susceptum esse uel abs te tali uiro uel a quopiam, si alius illa scripsit, fateor, non mediocriter doleo, donec refellantur, si forte refelli possunt, ea quae me mouent. mihi enim uidetur exitiosissime credi aliquod in libris sanctis esse mendacium, id est eos homines, per quos nobis illa scriptura ministrata est atque conscripta, aliquid in libris suis fuisse mentitos. alia quippe quaestio est, sitne aliquando mentiri uiri boni, et alia quaestio est, utrum scriptorem sanctarum scripturarum mentiri oportuerit, immo uero non alia, sed nulla quaestio est. admisso enim semel in tantum auctoritatis fastigium officioso aliquo mendacio, nulla illorum librorum particula remanebit, quae non, ut cuique uidebitur uel ad mores difficilis uel ad fidem incredibilis, eadem perniciosissima regula ad mentientis auctoris consilium officiumque referatur.

### English translation (Claude)

I have also read some writings on the letters of the apostle Paul that were said to be yours. When you sought to explain the letter to the Galatians, you came to that passage in which the apostle Peter is called back from a ruinous pretence. There, I confess, I grieve not a little that the defence of a lie has been undertaken, whether by you, such a man as you are, or by someone else, if another wrote these things; and I shall grieve until the things that trouble me are refuted, if perhaps they can be refuted. For it seems to me most disastrous to believe that there is any lie in the holy books, that is, that the men through whom that Scripture was ministered and written down for us told any lie in their books. For it is one question whether it is ever the part of a good man to lie, and another whether it was proper for a writer of the holy Scriptures to lie; or rather, it is not another question but no question at all. For once some well-meant lie has been admitted into so lofty a height of authority, no little part of those books will remain which, whenever it seems to anyone either difficult for conduct or incredible for faith, will not be referred, by this same most ruinous rule, to the plan and purpose of a lying author.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11–14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Well-meant lie' renders officiosum mendacium (a lie told for a useful purpose). The passage concerned is Gal 2:11–14, which Jerome interpreted as a pretended dispute; this begins the Augustine–Jerome controversy.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 28.3 (CSEL 34.1:107–108; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-3).

## Letter 28.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:108–111
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if Paul could lie in rebuking Peter, heretics could claim his teaching on marriage was also a lie, and that Paul himself treats falsehood about God as a crime.

### Latin text

Si enim mentiebatur apostolus Paulus, cum apostolum Petrum obiurgans diceret: Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non iudaice uiuis, quem ad modum gentes cogis iudaizare? et recte illi uidebatur Petrus fecisse, quem non recte fecisse et dixit et scripsit, ut quasi animos tumultuantium deleniret, quid respondebimus, cum exsurrexerint peruersi homines prohibentes nuptias, quos futuros ipse praenuntiauit, et dixerint totum illud, quod idem apostolus de matrimoniorum iure firmando locutus est, propter homines, qui dilectione coniugum tumultuari poterant, fuisse mentitum, scilicet non quod hoc senserit, sed ut illorum placaretur aduersitas? non opus est multa commemorare. possunt enim uideri etiam de laudibus dei esse officiosa mendacia, ut apud homines pigriores dilectio eius ardescat. atque ita nusquam certa erit in sanctis libris castae ueritatis auctoritas. nonne adtendimus eundem apostolum cum ingenti cura commendandae ueritatis dicere: Si autem Christus non resurrexit, inanis est praedicatio nostra, inanis est et fides uestra. inuenimur autem et falsi testes dei, quia testimonium diximus aduersus deum, quod suscitauerit Christum, quem non suscitauit? si quis huic diceret: Quid in hoc mendacio perhorrescis, cum id dixeris, quod etiam si falsum sit, ad laudem dei maxime pertinet nonne huius detestatus insaniam quibus posset uerbis et significationibus in lucem penetralia sui cordis aperiret clamans non minore aut fortasse etiam maiore scelere in deo laudari falsitatem quam ueritatem uituperari? agendum est igitur, ut ad cognitionem diuinarum scripturarum talis homo accedat, qui de sanctis libris tam sancte et ueraciter existimet, ut nolit aliqua eorum parte delectari per officiosa mendacia, potiusque id, quod non intellegit, transeat, quam cor suum praeferat illi ueritati. profecto enim cum hoc dicit, credi sibi expetit et id agit, ut diuinarum scripturarum auctoritatibus non credamus.

### English translation (Claude)

For if the apostle Paul was lying when, rebuking the apostle Peter, he said, 'If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?', and if Peter seemed to him to have acted rightly, though he both said and wrote that he had not acted rightly, in order, as it were, to soothe the minds of those who were in an uproar, what shall we answer when perverse men arise forbidding marriage, as he himself foretold, and say that all that the same apostle said to confirm the right of marriage was a lie, told for the sake of people who might cause an uproar out of love for their wives, that is, not because he thought it, but to appease their opposition? There is no need to mention many things. For even in the praises of God there could seem to be well-meant lies, so that love for him may be kindled among lazier people. And so nowhere in the holy books will the authority of pure truth be certain. Do we not notice the same apostle, with great care to commend the truth, saying: 'If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is empty, and your faith is empty too. And we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we have testified against God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise'? If someone said to him: 'Why do you shudder at this lie, when what you would have said, even if false, contributes greatly to the praise of God?', would he not, detesting this man's madness, open the depths of his heart to the light with whatever words and signs he could, crying out that to praise falsehood in God is no less a crime, perhaps even a greater one, than to blame truth? We must see to it, then, that the man who comes to the knowledge of the divine Scriptures thinks so holily and truthfully about the holy books that he does not wish to take delight in any part of them through well-meant lies, and would rather pass over what he does not understand than prefer his own heart to that truth. For surely, when he says this, he asks to be believed himself, and works to make us not believe the authorities of the divine Scriptures.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:3: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:14–15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gal 2:14 and 1 Cor 15:14–15; allusion to 1 Tim 4:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 28.4 (CSEL 34.1:108–111; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-4).

## Letter 28.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:111–114
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to reinterpret the texts used to justify useful lies, and asks him to read and frankly criticize the writings Profuturus brings.

### Latin text

Et ego quidem qualibuscumque uiribus, quas dominus suggerit, omnia illa testimonia, quae adhibita sunt adstruendae utilitati mendacii, aliter oportere intellegi ostenderem, ut ubique eorum firma ueritas doceretur. quam enim testimonia mendacia esse non debent, tam non debent fauere mendacio. sed hoc intellegentiae relinquo tuae. admota enim lectioni diligentiore consideratione multo id fortasse facilius uidebis quam ego. ad hanc autem considerationem coget te pietas, qua cognoscis fluctuare auctoritatem diuinarum scripturarum, ut in eis, quod uult quisque credat, quod non uult non credat, si semel fuerit persuasum aliqua illos uiros, per quos nobis haec ministrata sunt, in scripturis suis officiose potuisse mentiri, nisi forte regulas quasdam daturus es, quibus nouerimus, ubi oporteat mentiri et ubi non oporteat. quod si fieri potest, nullo modo mendacibus dubiisque rationibus id explices quaeso. nec me onerosum aut inpudentem iudices per humanitatem ueracissimam domini nostri. nam ut non dicam nulla, certe non magna culpa meus error ueritati fauet, si recte in te potest ueritas fauere mendacio. Multa alia cum sincerissimo corde tuo loqui cuperem et de christiano studio conferre, sed huic desiderio meo nulla epistula sat est. uberius id possum per fratrem, quem miscendum et alendum dulcibus atque utilibus sermocinationibus tuis misisse me gaudeo. et tamen, quantum uellem, nec ipse, quod eius pace dixerim, forsitan capit. quamquam nihilo me illi praetulerim; ego enim me fateor tui capaciorem, sed ipsum uideo fieri pleniorem, quo me sine dubitatione antecellit. et posteaquam redierit, quod domino adiuuante prosperatum iri spero, cum eius pectoris abs te cumulati particeps fuero, non est impleturus, quod in me adhuc uacuum erit atque auidum sensorum tuorum. ita fiet, ut ego etiam tunc egentior sim, ille copiosior. sane idem frater aliqua scripta nostra fert secum. quibus legendis si dignationem adhibueris, etiam sinceram fraternamque seueritatem adhibeas quaeso. non enim aliter intellego, quod scriptum est: Emendabit me iustus in misericordia et arguet me; oleum autem peccatoris non inpinguet caput meum, nisi quia magis amat obiurgator sanans quam adulator unguens caput. ego autem difficillime bonus iudex lego, quod scripserim, sed aut timidior recto aut cupidior. uideo etiam interdum uitia mea, sed haec malo audire a melioribus, ne, cum me recte fortasse reprehendero, rursus mihi blandiar et meticulosam potius mihi uidear in me quam iustam tulisse sententiam.

### English translation (Claude)

And I for my part, with whatever strength the Lord supplies, would show that all those testimonies which have been brought forward to establish the usefulness of lying must be understood otherwise, so that their firm truth may be taught everywhere. For just as testimonies ought not to be lies, so they ought not to favour lying. But this I leave to your understanding. For if you apply more careful consideration to the reading, you will perhaps see it much more easily than I. To this consideration you will be compelled by your piety, through which you recognize that the authority of the divine Scriptures becomes unsteady, so that in them each person believes what he wants and does not believe what he does not want, once it has been accepted that those men through whom these things were ministered to us could have told well-meant lies in their writings; unless perhaps you are going to give some rules by which we may know where it is proper to lie and where it is not. If this can be done, I ask you to explain it by no lying or doubtful reasons. And do not judge me burdensome or impudent, I beg you by the most truthful humanity of our Lord. For my error, if I err, favours truth with no fault, or certainly with no great fault, if in your case truth can rightly favour a lie. Many other things I would like to discuss with your most sincere heart, and to confer about Christian study, but no letter is enough for this desire of mine. I can do it more abundantly through the brother whom I rejoice to have sent to share and be nourished by your sweet and useful conversations. And yet even he, if I may say so with his leave, perhaps does not take in as much as I would wish. Though I would in no way prefer myself to him; for I confess that I am more capable of receiving you, but I see that he is becoming fuller, in which he undoubtedly surpasses me. And after he returns, which I hope with the Lord's help will turn out well, when I share in his heart filled by you, he will not fill what will still be empty in me and greedy for your thoughts. So it will happen that even then I shall be the needier and he the richer. This same brother is carrying with him some of our writings. If you deign to read them, I ask you to apply also a sincere and brotherly severity. For I do not understand otherwise what is written, 'The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me; but let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head', except that the one who rebukes and heals loves more than the flatterer who anoints the head. I find it very hard to read what I have written as a good judge; I am either more timid than is right or more eager. I see my faults too sometimes, but I prefer to hear them from better men, lest, when I have perhaps rightly blamed myself, I flatter myself again and seem to myself to have passed a fearful rather than a just sentence on myself.

### Scripture references

- Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Ps 141:5 (LXX 140:5).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 28.5 (CSEL 34.1:111–114; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/27-1/#p-28-5).

## Letter 29.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:114
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, presbyter at Hippo, writes to Alypius to report how the Lord answered their prayers concerning the people of Hippo.

### Latin text

De negotio interim, quod non curare non possum, nihil certum scribere potui absente fratre Machario, qui cito dicitur rediturus, et quod deo adiuuante peragi potuerit, peragetur. de nostra autem pro eis sollicitudine quamquam fratres nostri ciues, qui aderant, securos uos facere possent, tamen digna res epistulari conloquio, quo nos inuicem consolamur, a domino praestita est, in quo promerendo multum nos adiutos esse credimus ipsa uestra sollicitudine, quae profecto sine deprecatione pro nobis esse non potuit.

### English translation (Claude)

About the business which I cannot fail to care for, I have been able to write nothing certain in the meantime, since brother Macarius is away; he is said to be returning soon, and what can be accomplished with God's help will be accomplished. As for our concern for the people, although our brothers, your fellow citizens who were present, could set your mind at rest, the Lord has nevertheless granted us something worthy of a conversation by letter, by which we console each other; and in obtaining it we believe we were greatly helped by your very concern, which certainly could not have been without prayer for us.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Alypius, bishop of Thagaste.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.1 (CSEL 34.1:114; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-1).

## Letter 29.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:114–115
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that, when the people of Hippo protested against the banning of the festival of 'Gladness', he preached on Christ's saying about dogs and swine.

### Latin text

Itaque non praetermittamus uestrae caritati narrare, quid gestum sit, ut nobiscum deo gratias agatis de accepto beneficio, qui nobiscum preces de accipiendo fudistis. cum post profectionem tuam nobis nuntiatum esset tumultuari homines et dicere se ferre non posse, ut illa sollemnitas prohiberetur, quam laetitiam nominantes uinulentiae nomen frustra conantur abscondere, sicut etiam te praesente iam iam nuntiabatur, opportune nobis accidit occulta ordinatione omnipotentis dei, ut quarta feria illud in euangelio capitulum consequenter tractaretur: Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque proieceritis margaritas uestras ante porcos. tractatum est ergo de canibus et de porcis ita; ut et peruicaci latratu aduersus dei praecepta rixantes et uoluptatum carnalium sordibus dediti erubescere cogerentur, conclusumque ita, ut uiderent, quam esset nefarium intra ecclesiae parietes id agere nomine religionis, quod in suis domibus si agere perseuerarent, sancto et margaritis ecclesiasticis eos arceri oporteret.

### English translation (Claude)

So let us not fail to tell Your Love what has happened, so that you, who poured out prayers with us that we might receive this benefit, may give thanks to God with us for receiving it. After your departure it was reported to us that people were in an uproar, saying that they could not bear the prohibition of that festival which they call 'Gladness', vainly trying to hide under that name the name of drunkenness, as was already being reported while you were still present. By the hidden ordering of almighty God it happened opportunely for us that on Wednesday that chapter of the gospel came up in order for exposition: 'Do not give what is holy to dogs, nor cast your pearls before swine.' So there was a discussion of dogs and swine in such a way that both those who quarrel against God's commands with stubborn barking and those given to the filth of carnal pleasures were compelled to blush; and it was concluded in such a way that they would see how wicked it was to do within the walls of the church, in the name of religion, what, if they persisted in doing it in their own homes, would require them to be kept away from what is holy and from the pearls of the church.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Gladness' (Laetitia) was the popular feast at Hippo, apparently held in honour of the martyr-bishop Leontius. Quotation of Matt 7:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.2 (CSEL 34.1:114–115; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-2).

## Letter 29.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:115
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: At the beginning of Lent Augustine preached on Christ's cleansing of the temple, arguing that he would far more drive out drunken feasts.

### Latin text

Sed haec quamuis grate accepta fuerint, tamen quia pauci conuenerant, non erat satisfactum tanto negotio. iste autem sermo cum ab eis, qui aderant, pro cuiusque facultate ac studio foris uentilaretur, multos habuit contradictores. postea uero quam dies quadragesimae inluxisset et frequens multitudo ad horam tractationis occurrit, lectum est illud in euangelio, ubi dominus de templo expulsis uenditoribus animalium et euersis mensis nummulariorum dixit domum patris sui pro domo orationum speluncam latronum esse factam. quod capitulum, cum eos intentos proposita uinulentiae quaestione feci, et ipse quoque recitaui adiunxique disputationem, qua ostenderem, quanto commotius et uehementius dominus noster ebriosa conuiuia, quae ubique sunt turpia, de templo expelleret, unde sic expulit concessa commercia, cum ea uenderentur, quae sacrificiis illo tempore licitis essent necessaria, quaerens ab eis, quibus similiorem putarent speluncam latronum necessaria uendentibus an inmoderate bibentibus.

### English translation (Claude)

But although these words were received gratefully, yet, because few had come, they were not enough for so great a matter. When this sermon was spread abroad by those present, according to each one's ability and zeal, it met many opponents. But when the day of Quadragesima (the beginning of Lent) dawned and a great crowd gathered at the hour of exposition, the passage of the gospel was read in which the Lord, after driving the sellers of animals out of the temple and overturning the tables of the money-changers, said that his Father's house, a house of prayer, had been made a den of robbers. When I had made them attentive by putting forward the question of drunkenness, I read this chapter again myself and added a discussion to show with how much greater anger and vehemence our Lord would drive drunken banquets, which are shameful everywhere, out of the temple, when he drove out from it in this way even permitted trade, in which things were sold that were necessary for the sacrifices lawful at that time; and I asked them which they thought more like a den of robbers, those selling necessities or those drinking immoderately.

### Scripture references

- Matt 21:12–13: allusion, high confidence
- John 2:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Matt 21:12–13 (John 2:14–16).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.3 (CSEL 34.1:115; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-3).

## Letter 29.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-4
- Source: CSEL 34.1:115–116
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminded the people that Israel feasted in drunkenness only once, before the golden calf, and urged them not to do as Christians what Israel did for an idol.

### Latin text

Et quoniam mihi praeparatae lectiones suggerendae tenebantur, adiunxi deinde ipsum adhuc carnalem populum Iudaeorum in illo templo, ubi nondum corpus et sanguis domini offerebatur, non solum uinulenta sed nec sobria quidem umquam celebrasse conuiuia nec eos publice religionis nomine inebriatos inueniri in historia, nisi cum festa fabricato idolo exoluerent. quae cum dicerem, codicem etiam accepi et recitaui totum illum locum. addidi etiam cum dolore, quo potui, quoniam apostolus ait ad discernendum populum christianum a duritia Iudaeorum epistulam suam non in tabulis lapideis scriptam sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus, cum Moyses famulus dei propter illos principes binas lapideas tabulas confregisset, quo modo non possemus istorum corda confringere, qui homines noui testamenti sanctorum diebus celebrandis ea uellent sollemniter exhibere, quae populus ueteris testamenti et semel et idolo celebrauit.

### English translation (Claude)

And since the readings prepared for me to put forward were kept ready, I then added that the Jewish people, though still carnal, in that temple where the body and blood of the Lord were not yet offered, never celebrated banquets, not only drunken ones but even sober ones, and that in their history they are not found drunk in public in the name of religion except when they held a feast for the idol they had made. As I said this, I took the book and read the whole passage. I added also, with all the grief I could, that since the apostle, to distinguish the Christian people from the hardness of the Jews, says that his letter was written not on tablets of stone but on fleshly tablets of the heart, while Moses the servant of God broke the two stone tablets because of those leaders, how could we not break the hearts of those who, being people of the new covenant, wished to present solemnly, in celebrating the days of the saints, what the people of the old covenant celebrated only once, and for an idol?

### Scripture references

- Exod 32:6: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 32:19: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Exod 32:6, 19; 2 Cor 3:3. The contrast between the 'carnal' Jewish people and the Christian people is Augustine's own; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.4 (CSEL 34.1:115–116; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-4).

## Letter 29.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-5
- Source: CSEL 34.1:116–117
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine read the people Paul's lists of sins that exclude from the kingdom, including drunkenness, and his rebuke of feasting at the Lord's supper, arguing that no banquets belong in the church.

### Latin text

Tunc reddito exodi codice crimen ebrietatis, quantum tempus sinebat, exaggerans sumpsi apostolum Paulum et, inter quae peccata posita esset, ostendi legens illum locum: Si quis frater nominetur aut fornicator aut idolis seruiens aut auarus aut maledicus aut ebriosus aut rapax, cum eius modi nec cibum sumere, ingemescendo admonens, cum quanto periculo conuiuaremur cum eis, qui uel in domibus inebriarentur. legi etiam illud, quod non longo interuallo sequitur: Nolite errare; neque fornicatores neque idolis seruientes neque adulteri neque molles neque masculorum concubitores neque fures neque auari neque ebriosi neque maledici neque raptores regnum dei possidebunt. et haec quidem fuistis, sed abluti estis, sed iustificati estis in nomine domini Iesu Christi et spiritu dei nostri. quibus lectis dixi, ut considerarent, quo modo possent fideles audire: sed abluti estis, qui adhuc talis concupiscentiae sordes, contra quas clauditur regnum caelorum, in corde suo, id est in interiore dei templo esse patiuntur. inde uentum est ad illud capitulum: Conuenientibus ergo uobis in unum non est dominicam cenam celebrare, unusquisque enim propriam cenam praesumit in manducando et alius quidem esurit, alius ebrius est. numquid domos non habetis ad manducandum et bibendum? an ecclesiam dei contemnitis? quo recitato diligentius commendaui, ne honesta quidem et sobria conuiuia debere in ecclesia celebrari, quando quidem apostolus non dixerit: numquid domos non habetis ad inebriandos uos ut quasi tantum modo inebriari in ecclesia non liceret, sed ad manducandum et bibendum, quod potest honeste fieri sed praeter ecclesiam ab eis, qui domos habent, ubi alimentis necessariis refici possint. et tamen nos ad has angustias corruptorum temporum et diffluentium morum esse perductos, uti nondum modesta conuiuia sed saltem domesticum regnum ebrietatis optemus.

### English translation (Claude)

Then, having given back the book of Exodus, I enlarged on the crime of drunkenness as far as time allowed, took up the apostle Paul, and showed among which sins it was placed, reading that passage: 'If anyone who is called a brother is sexually immoral or an idolater or greedy or a slanderer or a drunkard or a robber, with such a one do not even eat'; and I warned them with groans how dangerous it was for us to eat with those who got drunk even in their homes. I also read what follows at no great distance: 'Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor the effeminate nor men who lie with males nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor robbers will possess the kingdom of God. And such you were; but you were washed, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.' After reading these, I told them to consider how the faithful could hear 'but you were washed', when they still allow the filth of such desire, against which the kingdom of heaven is closed, in their heart, that is, in the inner temple of God. Then we came to that chapter: 'When you come together, then, it is not to celebrate the Lord's supper; for each one goes ahead with his own supper in eating, and one is hungry and another drunk. Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God?' After reading this I emphasized more carefully that not even honourable and sober banquets ought to be held in the church, since the apostle did not say, 'Do you not have houses to get drunk in?', as though only getting drunk in the church were forbidden, but 'to eat and drink in', which can be done honourably, but outside the church, by those who have houses where they can be refreshed with the food they need. And yet we have been brought to such straits by corrupt times and dissolute morals that we do not yet hope for moderate banquets, but at least that the reign of drunkenness may be confined to the home.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 5:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:9–11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:20–22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Cor 5:11; 6:9–11; 11:20–22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.5 (CSEL 34.1:116–117; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-5).

## Letter 29.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-6
- Source: CSEL 34.1:117–118
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine read the people Paul's lists of the works of the flesh and the fruit of the Spirit, asking how Christians could be known by the fruit of drunkenness.

### Latin text

Commemoraui etiam euangelii capitulum, quod pridie tractaueram, ubi de pseudoprophetis dictum est: Ex fructibus eorum cognoscetis eos. deinde in memoriam reuocaui fructus eo loco non appellatos nisi opera. tum quaesiui, inter quos fructus nominata esset ebrietas, et recitaui illud ad Galatas: Manifesta autem sunt opera carnis, quae sunt fornicationes, inmunditiae, luxuriae, idolorum seruitus, ueneficia, inimicitiae, contentiones, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, haereses, inuidiae, ebrietates, comissationes et his similia; quae praedico uobis, sicut praedixi, quoniam, qui talia agunt, regnum dei non possidebunt. post quae uerba interrogaui, quo modo de fructu ebrietatis agnosceremur christiani, quos de fructibus agnosci dominus iussit. adiunxi etiam legendum, quod sequitur: Fructus autem spiritus est caritas, gaudium, pax, longanimitas, benignitas, bonitas, fides, mansuetudo, continentia, egique, ut considerarent, quam esset pudendum atque plangendum, quod de illis fructibus carnis non solum priuatim uiuere, sed etiam honorem ecclesiae deferre cuperent et, si potestas daretur, totum tam magnae basilicae spatium turbis epulantium ebriorumque complerent; de spiritalibus autem fructibus, ad quos et diuinarum scripturarum auctoritate et nostris gemitibus inuitarentur, nolunt adferre deo munera et his potissimum celebrare festa sanctorum.

### English translation (Claude)

I also recalled the chapter of the gospel which I had expounded the day before, where it is said of false prophets: 'By their fruits you will know them.' Then I reminded them that in that place 'fruits' means nothing other than works. Then I asked among which fruits drunkenness was named, and read that passage to the Galatians: 'Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are sexual immorality, impurity, debauchery, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, dissensions, heresies, envy, drunkenness, revelling, and things like these; of which I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God.' After these words I asked how we could be recognized as Christians by the fruit of drunkenness, when the Lord commanded that we be recognized by our fruits. I added that what follows should also be read: 'But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, self-control'; and I made them consider how shameful and lamentable it was that they wished not only to live privately by those fruits of the flesh but even to offer them as an honour to the church, and, if they were given the power, would fill the whole space of so great a basilica with crowds of feasting and drunken people; while of the spiritual fruits, to which they were invited both by the authority of the divine Scriptures and by our groans, they will not bring gifts to God and celebrate the feasts of the saints chiefly with these.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:19–21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:22–23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Matt 7:16; Gal 5:19–21; 5:22–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.6 (CSEL 34.1:117–118; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-6).

## Letter 29.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-7
- Source: CSEL 34.1:118–119
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appealed to the people by Christ's passion and by Valerius's love for them, warned them of God's chastening, and ended in tears shared with the congregation.

### Latin text

Quibus peractis codicem reddidi et imperata oratione, quantum ualui et quantum me ipsum periculum urguebat et uires subministrare dominus dignabatur, constitui eis ante oculos commune periculum et ipsorum, qui nobis commissi essent, et nostrum, qui de illis rationem reddituri essemus pastorum principi, per cuius humilitatem, insignes contumelias, alapas et sputus in faciem et palmas et spineam coronam et crucem ac sanguinem obsecraui, ut, si se ipsi aliquid offendissent, uel nostri misererentur et cogitarent uenerabilis senis Valerii circa me ineffabilem caritatem, qui mihi tractandi uerba ueritatis tam periculosum onus non dubitarit propter eos inponere eisque saepe dixerit, quod orationes eius exauditae essent de nostro aduentu, quos non utique ad communem mortem uel spectaculum mortis illorum sed ad communem conatum in aeternam uitam ad se uenisse laetatus est. postremo etiam dixi certum esse me et fidere in eum, qui mentiri nescit, qui per os prophetae sui pollicitus est de domino nostro Iesu Christo dicens: Si reliquerint filii eius legem meam et in praeceptis meis non ambulauerint, si iustificationes meas profanauerint, uisitabo in uirga facinora eorum et in flagellis delicta eorum; misericordiam autem meam non auferam, in eum. ergo me fidere, quod, si haec tanta, quae sibi essent lecta et dicta, contemnerent, uisitaturus esset in uirga et in flagello nec eos permissurus cum hoc mundo damnari. in qua conquestione sic actum, ut pro negotii atque periculi magnitudine tutor et gubernator noster animos facultatemque praebebat. non ego illorum lacrimas meis lacrimis moui, sed cum talia dicerentur, fateor, eorum fletu praeuentus meum abstinere non potui. et cum iam pariter fleuissemus, plenissima spe correctionis illorum finis sermonis mei factus est.

### English translation (Claude)

When this was done I gave back the book, and, having called for prayer, as far as I was able, as far as the danger itself pressed me and the Lord deigned to supply strength, I set before their eyes the common danger, both of themselves, who had been entrusted to us, and of us, who would render an account of them to the Prince of shepherds. By his humility, his remarkable insults, the blows and spitting in the face, the slaps, the crown of thorns, the cross and the blood, I implored them that, if they were in any way displeased with themselves, they would at least have pity on us, and think of the unspeakable love of the venerable old man Valerius for me, who had not hesitated for their sake to lay on me the so dangerous burden of expounding the words of truth, and had often told them that his prayers had been heard in our coming; he rejoiced that we had come to him not, surely, to share their death or to watch their death, but to strive together with them toward eternal life. Finally I said also that I was certain and trusted in him who cannot lie, who promised through the mouth of his prophet, speaking of our Lord Jesus Christ: 'If his children forsake my law and do not walk in my commandments, if they profane my statutes, I will visit their crimes with the rod and their offences with scourges; but I will not take away my mercy from him.' So I said I trusted that, if they despised these great things which had been read and said to them, he would visit them with the rod and the scourge and not allow them to be condemned with this world. In this complaint I acted as our guardian and pilot gave me courage and ability, in proportion to the greatness of the matter and the danger. I did not move their tears by my tears; but when such things were said, I confess, their weeping came first and I could not restrain my own. And when we had wept together, I ended my sermon with the fullest hope of their correction.

### Scripture references

- Ps 89:30–33 (88:31-Ps LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Titus 1:2: echo, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 5:4: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Ps 89:30–33 (LXX 88:31–34), applied to Christ; 'him who cannot lie' echoes Titus 1:2; 'Prince of shepherds' echoes 1 Pet 5:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.7 (CSEL 34.1:118–119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-7).

## Letter 29.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-8
- Source: CSEL 34.1:119
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: When some still asked why the custom was now forbidden, the objectors came to Augustine before the service and were persuaded, and he answered 'Why now?' with 'Even now'.

### Latin text

Postridie uero cum inluxisset dies, cui solebant fauces uentresque se parare, nuntiatur mihi nonnullos eorum etiam, qui sermoni aderant, nondum a murmuratione cessasse tantumque in eis ualere uim pessimae consuetudinis, ut eius tantum uoce uterentur et dicerent: Quare modo? non enim antea, qui haec non prohibuerunt, christiani non erant quo audito quas sicut maiores commouendi eos machinas praepararem, omnino nesciebam; disponebam tamen, si perseuerandum putarent, lecto illo loco de propheta Ezechiele: Explorator absoluitur, si periculum denuntiauerit, etiam si illi, quibus denuntiatur, cauere noluerint uestimenta mea excutere atque discedere. tum uero dominus ostendit, quod nos non deserat et quibus modis, in se ut praesumamus, hortetur; namque ante horam, qua exhedram ascenderemus, ingressi sunt ad me idem ipsi, quos audieram de oppugnatione uetustae consuetudinis fuisse conquestos. quos blande acceptos paucis uerbis in sententiam sanam transtuli. atque ubi uentum est ad tempus disputationis, omissa lectione, quam praeparaueram, quia necessaria iam non uidebatur, de hac ipsa quaestione pauca disserui, nihil nos nec breuius nec uerius posse adferre aduersus eos, qui dicunt: Quare modo? nisi et nos dicamus: Vel modo.

### English translation (Claude)

But the next day, when the day dawned for which they used to prepare their throats and bellies, it was reported to me that some of them, even of those who had been present at the sermon, had not yet stopped murmuring, and that the force of the worst custom was so strong in them that they used only its voice and said: 'Why now? For those who did not forbid these things before were not un-Christian.' When I heard this I did not know at all what greater engines I could prepare to move them; yet I was planning, if they thought they should persist, to read that passage from the prophet Ezekiel, 'The watchman is absolved if he has announced the danger, even if those to whom it is announced do not wish to take care', and to shake out my garments and depart. But then the Lord showed that he does not desert us, and in what ways he encourages us to trust in him; for before the hour at which we were to go up to the platform, the very people came in to me whom I had heard complaining about the attack on the old custom. I received them kindly and in a few words brought them over to a sound view. And when the time came for the discourse, I omitted the reading I had prepared, since it no longer seemed necessary, and spoke briefly on this very question: that we could bring nothing shorter or truer against those who say 'Why now?' than for us to say 'Even now.'

### Scripture references

- Ezek 33:9: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 18:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Ezek 33:9 and Acts 18:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.8 (CSEL 34.1:119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-8).

## Letter 29.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-9
- Source: CSEL 34.1:119–120
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explained that the feasts at martyrs' shrines had been tolerated after the persecutions to ease the conversion of pagans, but must now be given up.

### Latin text

Verum tamen ne illi, qui ante nos tam manifesta inperitae multitudinis crimina uel permiserunt uel prohibere non ausi sunt, aliqua a nobis affici contumelia uiderentur, exposui eis, qua necessitate ista in ecclesia uiderentur exorta. scilicet post persecutiones tam multas tamque uehementes cum facta pace turbae gentilium in christianum nomen uenire cupientes hoc impedirentur, quod dies festos cum idolis suis solerent in abundantia epularum et ebrietate consumere nec facile ab his perniciosissimis sed tamen uetustissimis uoluptatibus se possent abstinere, uisum fuisse maioribus nostris, ut huic infirmitatis parti interim parceretur diesque festos post eos, quos relinquebant, alios in honorem sanctorum martyrum uel non simili sacrilegio quamuis simili luxu celebrarent; iam Christi nomine conligatis et tantae auctoritatis iugo subditis salutaria sobrietatis praecepta traderentur, quibus iam propter praecipientis honorem ac timorem resistere non ualerent. quocirca iam tempus esse, ut, qui non se audent negare christianos, secundum Christi uoluntatem uiuere incipiant, ut ea, quae, ut essent christiani, concessa sunt, cum christiani sunt, respuantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet, lest those who before us had either permitted, or not dared to forbid, such manifest offences of the ignorant multitude should seem to be insulted by us, I explained to them by what necessity these things appear to have arisen in the church. After so many and such violent persecutions, when peace had come, crowds of pagans who wished to come to the Christian name were held back because they were used to spending their feast days with their idols in abundance of feasting and drunkenness, and could not easily abstain from these most pernicious yet most ancient pleasures. It seemed good to our forefathers to spare this part of their weakness for the time being, and to let them celebrate, in place of those they were leaving, other feast days in honour of the holy martyrs, not with similar sacrilege, though with similar luxury; so that, once they were bound together by the name of Christ and placed under the yoke of so great an authority, they might be given the saving precepts of sobriety, which they could no longer resist, out of honour and fear for the one who gave them. Therefore it was now time that those who do not dare to deny that they are Christians should begin to live according to the will of Christ, and that what had been conceded so that they might become Christians should be rejected now that they are Christians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.9 (CSEL 34.1:119–120; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-9).

## Letter 29.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-10
- Source: CSEL 34.1:120–121
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answered the example of drinking at St Peter's in Rome by reading Peter's own letter against drunkenness, and invited the people to a midday service of readings and psalms.

### Latin text

Deinde hortatus sum, ut transmarinarum ecclesiarum, in quibus partim ista recepta numquam sunt, partim iam per bonos rectores populo obtemperante correcta, imitatores esse uellemus. et quoniam de basilica beati apostoli Petri cotidianae uinulentiae proferebantur exempla, dixi primo audisse nos saepe esse prohibitum, sed quod remotus sit locus ab episcopi conuersatione et in tanta ciuitate magna sit carnalium multitudo peregrinis praesertim, qui noui subinde ueniunt, tanto uiolentius quanto inscitius illam consuetudinem retinentibus, tam immanem pestem nondum compesci sedarique potuisse. uerum tamen nos si Petrum apostolum honoraremus, debere praecepta eius audire et multo deuotius epistulam, in qua uoluntas eius apparet, quam basilicam, in qua non apparet, intueri; statimque accepto codice recitaui, ubi ait: Christo enim passo pro nobis per carnem et uos eadem cogitatione armamini, quia, qui passus est carne, desiit a carne, ut iam non hominum desideriis sed uoluntate dei reliquum tempus in carne uiuat. sufficit enim uobis praeteritum tempus uoluntate hominum perfecisse ambulantes in libidinibus, desideriis, ebrietate, comissationibus et nefandis idolorum seruitutibus. quibus gestis cum omnes uno animo in bonam uoluntatem ire contempta mala consuetudine cernerem, hortatus sum, ut meridiano tempore diuinis lectionibus et psalmis interessent; ita illum diem multo mundius atque sincerius placere celebrandum et certe de multitudine conuenientium facile posse apparere, qui mentem et qui uentrem sequeretur. ita lectis omnibus sermo terminatus est.

### English translation (Claude)

Then I exhorted them that we should wish to imitate the churches overseas, in some of which these things were never accepted, while in others they have already been corrected by good rulers, with the people obeying. And since examples of daily drunkenness at the basilica of the blessed apostle Peter were being put forward, I said first that we had heard it had often been forbidden; but because the place is far from the bishop's residence, and in so great a city there is a great multitude of carnal people, especially strangers who keep arriving fresh and cling to that custom the more violently the more ignorantly, so monstrous a plague had not yet been checked and quelled. Yet if we honoured the apostle Peter, we ought to hear his precepts and look much more devoutly to his letter, in which his will appears, than to the basilica, in which it does not appear; and at once taking the book I read where he says: 'Since Christ suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves also with the same thought, for whoever has suffered in the flesh has ceased from the flesh, so as to live the rest of his time in the flesh no longer by human desires but by the will of God. For the time that is past suffices for having done the will of men, walking in lusts, desires, drunkenness, revelling, and unspeakable idolatries.' When this was done and I saw them all going with one mind toward good will, despising the bad custom, I exhorted them to be present at midday for the divine readings and psalms; I said that this was a much purer and more sincere way of celebrating that day, and that from the crowd that gathered it could easily be seen who followed the mind and who the belly. So, when everything had been read, the sermon was ended.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:1–3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of 1 Pet 4:1–3. The basilica of Peter is at Rome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.10 (CSEL 34.1:120–121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-10).

## Letter 29.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-11
- Source: CSEL 34.1:121–122
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In the afternoon the crowd grew; Augustine contrasted their spiritual feast with the drinking in the Donatists' basilica, and the day ended with evening prayer and hymns.

### Latin text

Pomeridiano autem die maior quam ante meridiem adfuit multitudo et usque ad horam, qua cum episcopo egrederemur, legebatur alternatim et psallebatur; nobisque egressis duo psalmi lecti sunt. deinde me inuitum, qui iam cupiebam peractum esse tam periculosum diem, iussum compulit senex, ut aliquid eis loquerer. habui breuem sermonem, quo gratias agerem deo, et quoniam in haereticorum basilica audiebamus ab eis solita conuiuia celebrata, cum adhuc etiam eo ipso tempore, quo a nobis ista gerebantur, illi in poculis perdurarent, dixi diei pulchritudinem noctis comparatione decorari et colorem candidum nigri uicinitate gratiorem. ita nostrum spiritalis celebrationis conuentum minus fortasse futurum fuisse iucundum, nisi ex alia parte carnalis ingurgitatio conferretur, hortatusque sum, ut tales epulas instanter appeterent, si gustassent, quam suauis est dominus; illis autem esse metuendum, qui tamquam primum sectantur, quod aliquando destruetur, cum quisque comes efficiatur eius rei, quam colit, insultaritque apostolus talibus dicens: Quorum deus uenter, cum idem alio loco dixerit: Esca uentri et uenter escis; deus autem et hunc et illas euacuabit. nos proinde oportere id sequi, quod non euacuatur, quod remotissimum a carnis affectu spiritus sanctificatione retinetur. atque in hanc sententiam pro tempore cum ea, quae dominus suggerere dignatus est, dicta essent, acta sunt uespertina, quae cotidie solent, nobisque cum episcopo recedentibus fratres eodem loco hymnos dixerunt non parua multitudine utriusque sexus ad obscuratum diem manente atque psallente.

### English translation (Claude)

In the afternoon a larger crowd was present than in the morning, and until the hour at which we went out with the bishop there was reading and psalm singing in turn; and after we had gone out, two psalms were read. Then the old man ordered and compelled me, unwilling as I was, since I longed for so dangerous a day to be over, to say something to them. I gave a short sermon to give thanks to God; and since we heard that in the basilica of the heretics their usual banquets had been celebrated, and that even at the very time when we were doing these things they were continuing in their cups, I said that the beauty of the day is enhanced by comparison with the night, and white is more pleasing next to black; so our gathering for a spiritual celebration would perhaps have been less delightful had not carnal gorging been set against it on the other side. And I exhorted them to seek such feasts eagerly, if they had tasted how sweet the Lord is; but that those should be afraid who pursue as their first good what will one day be destroyed, since each becomes the companion of the thing he worships; and the apostle mocked such people, saying, 'whose god is the belly', since he said in another place: 'Food for the belly and the belly for food; but God will destroy both the one and the other.' We therefore ought to follow what is not destroyed, what is kept by the sanctification of the Spirit farthest from the affection of the flesh. And when the things the Lord deigned to suggest had been said to this effect, as time allowed, the evening service was held, as it is daily; and as we withdrew with the bishop, the brothers said hymns in the same place, with no small crowd of both sexes remaining and singing psalms until the day grew dark.

### Scripture references

- Ps 34:8 (33:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'The heretics' are the Donatists. Allusion to Ps 34:8 (LXX 33:9); quotations of Phil 3:19 and 1 Cor 6:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.11 (CSEL 34.1:121–122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-11).

## Letter 29.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-12
- Source: CSEL 34.1:122–123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks for prayers, reports that Circumcellions have broken the altar of the Catholic church at Asna, and closes.

### Latin text

Digessi uobis, quantum breuiter potui, quod uos audire desiderasse quis dubitauerit? orate, ut a conatibus nostris omnia scandala et omnia taedia deus dignetur auertere. magna sane ex parte uobiscum requiescimus cum alacritate feruoris, quia spiritalis ecclesiae Tagastensium tam crebra nobis dona nuntiantur. nauis cum fratribus nondum uenit. apud Asnam, ubi est presbyter frater Argentius, Circumcelliones inuadentes basilicam nostram altare comminuerunt. causa nunc agitur, quae ut pacate agatur et ut ecclesiam catholicam decet ad opprimendas linguas haereseos inpacatae, multum uos petimus, ut oretis. epistulam Asiarchae misimus. beatissimi perseueretis in domino memores nostri. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

I have set out for you, as briefly as I could, what no one would doubt you wanted to hear. Pray that God may deign to turn away all scandals and all weariness from our efforts. We rest with you in great part, with eager fervour, because so many gifts of the spiritual church of Thagaste are reported to us. The ship with the brothers has not yet come. At Asna, where brother Argentius is presbyter, the Circumcellions invaded our basilica and broke the altar. The case is now being heard; we earnestly ask you to pray that it may be conducted peacefully and as befits the Catholic Church, so as to silence the tongues of the restless heresy. We have sent a letter to the Asiarch. Most blessed ones, persevere in the Lord, mindful of us. Amen.

### Translation notes

- The Asiarch was a provincial official; his precise role here is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 29.12 (CSEL 34.1:122–123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-29-12).

## Letter 30.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-1
- Source: CSEL 34.1:123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus of Nola writes again to Augustine, since his first letter seems not to have arrived.

### Latin text

Iam dudum, frater in Christo domino mi unanime, ut te in sanctis et piis laboribus tuis nescientem agnoui absentemque uidi, tota mente complexus alloquio quoque familiari atque fraterno per litteras adire properaui. et credo in manu et in gratia domini sermonem meum ad te fuisse perlatum; sed morante adhuc puero, quem ad te aliosque dilectos aeque deo salutandos ante hiemem miseramus, non potuimus ultra et officium nostrum suspendere et desiderium sermonis tui cupidissimum temperare. scripsimus itaque iterato nunc, si priores ad te litterae nostrae peruenire meruerunt, aut primo, si illis in manus tuas perueniendi felicitas non fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

Long ago, my brother of one mind in Christ the Lord, as soon as I came to know you in your holy and pious labours, without your knowing it, and saw you though you were absent, I embraced you with my whole mind and hastened to approach you also with a familiar and brotherly address by letter. And I believe my words were carried to you by the hand and grace of the Lord; but since the servant whom we had sent before winter to greet you and others equally beloved by God is still delayed, we could no longer either suspend our duty or restrain our most eager desire for your words. So we have written now a second time, if our earlier letter was fortunate enough to reach you, or for the first time, if it did not have the good fortune of reaching your hands.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Paulinus to Augustine; the earlier letter is letter 25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 30.1 (CSEL 34.1:123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-1).

## Letter 30.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-2
- Source: CSEL 34.1:123–124
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus says that his love for Augustine, born from reading his anti-Manichaean works, rests on their membership of the one body of Christ.

### Latin text

Sed tu, frater spiritalis omnia iudicans, amorem in te nostrum ne pendas officio solo aut tempore litterarum. dominus enim testis est, qui unus atque idem operatur in suis ubique caritatem suam, iam abinde nobis, ex quo te beneficio uenerabilium episcoporum Aurelii et Alypii per tua in Manichaeos opera cognouimus, ita inditam dilectionem tuam, ut nobis non nouam aliquam amicitiam sumere, sed quasi ueterem caritatem resumere uideremur. denique nunc etsi sermone, non tamen tamquam et affectu rudes scribimus teque uicissim in spiritu per interiorem hominem quasi recognoscimus. nec mirum si et absentes adsumus nobis et ignoti nosmet nouimus, cum unius corporis membra simus, unum habeamus caput, una perfundamur gratia, uno pane uiuamus, una incedamus uia, eadem habitemus domo. denique in omne, quod sumus, tota spe ac fide, qua stamus in praesenti, nitimur in futurum, tam in spiritu quam in corpore domini unum sumus, ne simus nihil, si ab uno excidamus.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, a spiritual brother who judges all things, do not weigh our love for you by the duty or the timing of letters alone. For the Lord is witness, who, one and the same, works his love in his own everywhere, that ever since we came to know you through your works against the Manichaeans, by the kindness of the venerable bishops Aurelius and Alypius, love for you has been so implanted in us that we seemed not to take up some new friendship but to resume, as it were, an old love. And so now, though we write as beginners in speech, we do not write as beginners in affection, and we recognize you in turn, as it were, in the spirit through the inner man. Nor is it surprising if, though absent, we are present to each other, and, though unknown, we know each other, since we are members of one body, have one head, are steeped in one grace, live by one bread, walk one way, and dwell in the same house. In short, in all that we are, we press on toward the future with all the hope and faith by which we stand in the present; we are one both in the spirit and in the body of the Lord, lest we be nothing if we fall away from the One.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:15: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:22: echo, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 10:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 4:4–5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 2:15; Rom 7:22; 1 Cor 10:17; Eph 4:4–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 30.2 (CSEL 34.1:123–124; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-2).

## Letter 30.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-3
- Source: CSEL 34.1:124–125
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus longs to see Augustine in the flesh and commends to him the bearers Romanus and Agilis.

### Latin text

Quantulum ergo est, quod absentia corporalis nobis inuidet nostri, nisi sane fructum istum, quo pascuntur oculi temporalium expectatores? quamuis ne corporalis quidem gratia temporalis in spiritalibus dici debeat, quibus etiam corporum aeternitatem resurrectio largietur, ut audebimus in uirtute Christi et bonitatis dei patris uel indigni praesumere. quare utinam hoc quoque nobis munus adnueret gratia dei per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, ut etiam in carne faciem tuam uideremus! non solum desideriis nostris magnum conferretur gaudium, sed etiam mentibus lumen adcresceret et ex tua copia locupletaretur inopia nostra. quod quidem et absentibus largiri potes hac praesertim occasione, qua filii nostri unanimes et carissimi nobis in domino, Romanus et Agilis, quos ut nos alios tibi commendamus, in nomine domini reuertentur opere caritatis impleto. in quo tuae caritatis affectu specialiter utantur, rogamus. nosti enim, quam celsa promittat altissimus fratri fratrem adiuuanti. per hos, si quo me gratiae, quae tibi data est, dono remunerari uoles, tuto facies. sunt enim, uelim credas, unum cor et una in domino anima nobiscum. gratia dei tecum, ut est, in aeternum maneat, frater in Christo domino unanime, uenerabilis, dilectissime et desiderabilis. omnes in Christo sanctos, quales tibi cohaerere non dubium est, a nobis saluta. commenda nos omnibus sanctis, ut tecum pro nobis orare dignentur.

### English translation (Claude)

How little, then, is it that bodily absence begrudges us of each other, except indeed that enjoyment on which eyes that look for temporal things feed? Though not even bodily grace should be called temporal in spiritual people, to whom the resurrection will grant the eternity even of bodies, as we shall dare to presume, unworthy though we are, in the power of Christ and the goodness of God the Father. Would that the grace of God through our Lord Jesus Christ might grant us this gift also, that we might see your face in the flesh too! Not only would great joy be given to our longings, but light would increase in our minds, and our poverty would be enriched from your abundance. This you can grant even to those who are absent, especially on this occasion, when our sons Romanus and Agilis, of one mind and very dear to us in the Lord, whom we commend to you as other selves, will return in the name of the Lord, having fulfilled their work of love. We ask that they may enjoy in a special way the affection of your love. For you know what lofty things the Most High promises to a brother who helps a brother. Through them, if you wish to repay me with any gift of the grace given to you, you may do so safely. For they are, believe me, one heart and one soul with us in the Lord. May the grace of God remain with you, as it does, for ever, brother of one mind in Christ the Lord, venerable, most beloved and longed for. Greet from us all the saints in Christ who, no doubt, cling to you. Commend us to all the saints, that they may deign to pray for us with you.

### Scripture references

- Prov 18:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Prov 18:19 (Latin form); Acts 4:32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 30.3 (CSEL 34.1:124–125; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-30-3).

## Letter 31.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:1–2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Paulinus and Therasia that the delay of his first letter has brought him the gain of their second.

### Latin text

Cum litteras meas, quibus respondi prioribus uestris, si tamen uestris litteris ullo modo a me responderi potest, celerrime optauerim uenire in uestrae caritatis manus, ut aliquo pacto absens cito possem esse uobiscum, lucrum mihi uestrae epistulae contulit tarditas mea. bonus dominus, qui non tribuit saepe, quod uolumus, ut, quod mallemus, adtribuat. aliud est enim, quod accepta epistula mea scripturi estis, aliud, quod non accipiendo scripsistis. quod cum laetissime legerimus, defuisset certe nobis ista laetitia, si, sicut optauimus maximeque uoluimus, cito ad uestram sanctitatem nostrae litterae permeassent. nunc uero et haec habere scripta et illa sperare rescripta gaudio cumulatiore delectat. ita nec nostra culpa accusari potest et domini largior benignitas fecit, quod nostro desiderio conducibilius esse iudicauit.

### English translation (Claude)

Though I wished my letter, in which I answered your earlier one (if indeed your letters can in any way be answered by me), to come very quickly into the hands of Your Love, so that in some way, though absent, I might soon be with you, my slowness has brought me the gain of your letter. The Lord is good, who often does not give what we want, so that he may give what we would prefer. For what you will write when you have received my letter is one thing, and what you wrote without having received it is another. We read it with the greatest joy, and we would certainly have lacked that joy if, as we wished and very much wanted, our letter had quickly reached Your Holiness. But now to have this letter and to hope for that reply delights us with a fuller joy. So neither can we be blamed for any fault, and the more generous kindness of the Lord has done what he judged more profitable to our desire.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Paulinus and Therasia, answering letter 30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.1 (CSEL 34.2:1–2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-1).

## Letter 31.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the bearers Romanus and Agilis were a living letter, through whom he learned more of Paulinus and Therasia than any page could tell.

### Latin text

Sanctos fratres Romanum et Agilem, aliam epistulam uestram audientem uoces atque reddentem et suauissimam partem uestrae praesentiae, sed qua uobis uisendis inhiaremus auidius, cum magna in domino iucunditate suscepimus. unde aut quando aut quo modo uel uos praestare uel nos possemus exigere, ut nos de uobis tanta scribendo doceretis, quanta eorum ore didicimus? aderat etiam, quod nulli chartae adesse potest, tantum in narrantibus gaudium, ut per ipsum etiam uultum oculosque loquentium uos in cordibus eorum scriptos cum ineffabili laetitia legeremus. hoc quoque amplius erat, quod pagina quaelibet, quantacumque bona scripta contineat, nihil ipsa proficit, quamuis ad profectum explicetur aliorum; hanc autem epistulam uestram, fraternam scilicet animam, sic in eorum conloquio legebamus, ut tanto beatior appareret nobis, quanto uberius conscripta esset ex uobis. itaque illam ad eiusdem beatitatis imitationem studiosissime de uobis omnia percontando in nostra corda transcripsimus.

### English translation (Claude)

The holy brothers Romanus and Agilis, another letter of yours, one that hears voices and returns them, and a most sweet part of your presence, though one that made us long more eagerly to see you, we received with great joy in the Lord. From where, or when, or how could you provide, or we demand, that you should teach us by writing as much about yourselves as we learned from their mouths? There was present also what no paper can have: such joy in those who told us that through their very faces and eyes as they spoke we read you, written in their hearts, with unspeakable gladness. There was this further advantage: any page, however good the things written on it, itself gains nothing, although it is unrolled for the profit of others; but this letter of yours, that is, a brotherly soul, we read in our conversation with them in such a way that it appeared to us the more blessed the more richly it had been written from you. So, by eagerly asking about everything concerning you, we copied it into our hearts in imitation of that same blessedness.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.2 (CSEL 34.2:2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-2).

## Letter 31.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:2–4
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes his reluctance to let the bearers return and takes up Paulinus's own words about their unity in one body.

### Latin text

Nec ideo tamen eos tam cito a nobis licet ad uos remeantes sine molestia passi sumus. uidete enim, quaeso uos, quibus quatiebamur affectibus. tanto utique dimittendi erant ocius, quanto uobis inpensius oboedire cupiebant; sed quanto id cupiebant magis, tanto uos nobis praesentius exhibebant; eo quippe indicabant, quam cara uiscera uestra essent; tanto eos minus igitur dimittere uolebamus, quanto iustius, ut dimitterentur, instabant. o rem non ferendam, nisi a nobis ista discessione non discederemus, nisi unius essemus corporis membra, unum haberemus caput, una perfunderemur gratia, uno pane uiueremus, una incederemus uia, eadem habitaremus domo! cur enim non etiam isdem uerbis uteremur? agnoscitis enim, credo, haec esse ex epistula uestra. sed cur potius haec uestra sint uerba quam mea, quae utique quam uera sunt, tam nobis ab eiusdem capitis communione proueniunt? et si aliquid proprium uobis donatum haberent, tanto magis ea sic dilexi, ut obsiderent uiam pectoris mei neque a corde ad linguam meam uerba transire sinerent, donec tanto puriora, quanto sunt uestra, procederent. sancti fratres dilecti deo nostraque inuicem membra, quis dubitet nos uno spiritu uegetari, nisi qui non sentit, qua nobis dilectione uinciamur?

### English translation (Claude)

Yet we did not let them go back to you so soon without distress, even though they were returning to you. For see, I beg you, by what feelings we were shaken. They were surely to be let go the more quickly, the more earnestly they wished to obey you; but the more they wished it, the more present they made you to us, for by this they showed how dear your heart was to them. So we were the less willing to let them go, the more justly they pressed to be let go. O unbearable thing, were it not that we do not depart from one another by this departure, were it not that we are members of one body, have one head, are steeped in one grace, live by one bread, walk one way, and dwell in the same house! For why should we not use the same words too? You recognize, I believe, that these are from your letter. But why should these be your words rather than mine, since, being as true as they are, they come to us from communion with the same head? And if they had something given especially to you, I loved them all the more, so that they besieged the passage of my heart and did not let words pass from my heart to my tongue until they came forth all the purer for being yours. Holy brothers beloved of God and members of one another, who can doubt that we are quickened by one spirit, except one who does not feel with what love we are bound to one another?

### Translation notes

- The repeated phrases are quoted from letter 30.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.3 (CSEL 34.2:2–4; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-3).

## Letter 31.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:4–5
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Paulinus that Valerius has made him his fellow bishop, and begs Paulinus and Therasia to come to Africa.

### Latin text

Vellem tamen scire, utrum hanc absentiam corporalem uos patientius quam nos facilius toleretis. si ita est, fateor, non amo istam fortitudinem uestram, nisi forte quia nos tales sumus, ut minus a uobis desiderari quam uos desiderare debeamus. in me certe si esset patientia uestrae absentiae perferendae, displiceret mihi; segniter enim agerem, ut uos uiderem; quid autem absurdius quam fortitudine fieri segniorem? sed qua ecclesiae cura tenear, ex hoc uestra caritas oportet adtendat, quod beatissimus pater Valerius, qui uos nobiscum quantum salutet quantumque sitiat, audietis ex fratribus, nec presbyterum me esse suum passus est, nisi maiorem mihi coepiscopatus sarcinam inponeret. quod quidem quia tanta eius caritate tantoque populi studio dominum id uelle credidi, nonnullis iam exemplis praecedentibus, quibus mihi omnis excusatio claudebatur, uehementer timui excusare. sed quamquam iugum Christi per se ipsum lene sit et sarcina leuis, tamen propter nostram asperitatem atque infirmitatem, si quid me mordet hoc uinculum atque urget hoc onus, ineffabiliter mihi aliquanto uestrae praesentiae solatio tolerabilius et portabilius redderetur. uos autem audio curis eius modi expeditiores liberioresque uiuere. qua re non ego inpudenter rogo uos et postulo et flagito, ut in Africam maiore talium hominum siti quam siccitatis nobilitate laborantem uenire dignemini.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet I would like to know whether you bear this bodily absence more patiently than we bear it easily. If so, I confess I do not love this fortitude of yours, unless perhaps because we are such that we deserve to be longed for less by you than we long for you. Certainly, if I had the patience to endure your absence, it would displease me; for I would be sluggish in trying to see you; and what is more absurd than to become more sluggish through fortitude? But by what care for the church I am held, Your Love should note from this: the most blessed father Valerius (how warmly he greets you with us and how much he thirsts for you, you will hear from the brothers) did not allow me to remain his presbyter without laying on me the greater burden of being his fellow bishop. Because I believed that the Lord willed this, given his great love and the great zeal of the people, and since some precedents had already gone before by which every excuse was closed to me, I was greatly afraid to excuse myself. But although the yoke of Christ is in itself gentle and the burden light, yet because of our roughness and weakness, if this bond chafes me at all and this load presses me, it would be made inexpressibly more bearable and portable by some comfort of your presence. I hear that you live freer and less encumbered by cares of this kind. Therefore I am not impudent in asking, requesting and pressing you to deign to come to Africa, which suffers more from thirst for such people than from its famous dryness.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine was consecrated bishop as Valerius's colleague in 395/396. Allusion to Matt 11:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.4 (CSEL 34.2:4–5; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-4).

## Letter 31.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:5–6
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine wants Paulinus and Therasia in Africa as a visible example, since their renunciation of great wealth fulfils gladly what the rich young man heard with sadness.

### Latin text

Scit deus, quam non solum propter desiderium meum neque solum propter eos, qui uel per nos uestrum propositum uel undecumque fama praedicante didicerunt, sed etiam propter ceteros, qui partim non audiunt, partim audita non credunt, tamen possunt comperta diligere, uos istis terris etiam corporaliter adesse cupiamus. quamuis enim sedulo atque misericorditer id agatis, tamen etiam coram hominibus regionum nostrarum luceat opera uestra, ut uideant bona facta uestra et glorificent patrem uestrum, qui in caelis est. piscatores uocante domino quod nauiculas et retia dimiserunt, omnia se dimisisse et dominum secutos esse etiam commemorando laetati sunt. et re uera omnia contemnit, qui non solum, quantum potuit, sed etiam, quantum uoluit habere, contemnit. sed in eo, quod cupiebatur, oculi dei testes sunt, in eo, quod habebatur, et hominum. nescio quo autem modo, cum superflua terrena diliguntur, artius adepta quam concupita constringunt. nam unde tristis ille discessit, qui consilium consequendae uitae aeternae quaerebat a domino, cum audisset uendenda esse omnia sua et distribuenda pauperibus et habendum thesaurum in caelo, si uellet esse perfectus, nisi quia magnas, ut euangelium loquitur, habebat diuitias? aliud est enim iam nolle incorporare, quae desunt, aliud iam incorporata diuellere: illi uelut cibi repudiantur, illa uelut membra praeciduntur. quanto igitur et quantum mirabili gaudio nostris temporibus Christiana caritas conspicit per domini euangelium cum laetitia fieri, quod ore domini cum tristitia diues audiuit!

### English translation (Claude)

God knows that we want you to be present in these lands bodily too, not only for my longing, nor only for those who have learned of your way of life either through us or from report spreading from anywhere, but also for the others, who partly have not heard of it and partly, having heard, do not believe it, yet could love it once they found it to be true. For although you act diligently and mercifully, still let your works shine also before the people of our regions, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father who is in heaven. The fishermen, when the Lord called them, rejoiced to recall that in leaving their little boats and nets they had left everything and followed the Lord. And truly he despises everything who despises not only as much as he could have, but also as much as he wished to have. But for what was desired the eyes of God are witnesses; for what was possessed, the eyes of men as well. Yet in some way or other, when superfluous earthly things are loved, things acquired bind more tightly than things desired. For why did that man go away sad who sought from the Lord counsel for attaining eternal life, when he heard that he must sell all he had and distribute it to the poor and have treasure in heaven, if he wished to be perfect, except that, as the gospel says, he had great riches? For it is one thing no longer to wish to take into oneself what one lacks, and another to tear away what has already become part of oneself: the former are refused like food, the latter are cut off like limbs. With how great and how wonderful a joy, then, does Christian love see happening gladly in our times, through the Lord's gospel, what the rich man heard from the Lord's mouth with sadness!

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 4:20–22: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 19:21–22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 5:16; allusions to Matt 4:20–22; Matt 19:27; Matt 19:21–22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.5 (CSEL 34.2:5–6; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-5).

## Letter 31.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:6
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the couple's renunciation is the glory of Christ, an example to men and women alike, which they should not hide.

### Latin text

Quamquam nullis uerbis explicem conceptionem ac parturitionem cordis mei, tamen quia prudenter et pie intellegitis non esse istam uestram, hoc est humanam, sed in uobis domini gloriam — nam et inimicum cautissime intuemini deuotissimeque agitis, ut tamquam discipuli Christi humiles corde et mites sitis; utilius enim terrena opulentia tenetur humiliter, quam superbe relinquitur — quia ergo recte intellegitis non esse hanc uestram sed domini gloriam, uidebitis, quam parua et exigua dixerim. dixi enim de laudibus Christi, quibus sunt linguae inpares angelorum. hanc ergo Christi gloriam etiam oculis nostrorum hominum cupimus admoueri, in uno coniugio proposita utrique sexui calcandae superbiae et non desperandae perfectionis exempla. nescio si quicquam misericordius agitis, quam si tantum nolitis latere, quod tales estis, quantum tales esse uoluistis.

### English translation (Claude)

Although I can express in no words the conception and travail of my heart, yet since you understand prudently and piously that this is not your glory, that is, human glory, but the Lord's glory in you (for you watch the enemy most cautiously and strive most devoutly to be humble of heart and meek, as disciples of Christ; for earthly wealth is more usefully held humbly than proudly given up), since, then, you rightly understand that this is not your glory but the Lord's, you will see how small and slight are the things I have said. For I have spoken of the praises of Christ, to which the tongues of angels are unequal. This glory of Christ, then, we want brought before the eyes of our people too, examples set before both sexes, in one marriage, of trampling on pride and of not despairing of perfection. I do not know whether you could do anything more merciful than to be as unwilling to hide that you are such as you have been willing to be such.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Paulinus and Therasia were a married couple who had renounced their wealth and lived in continence. Allusions to Matt 11:29 and 1 Cor 13:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.6 (CSEL 34.2:6; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-6).

## Letter 31.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:6–7
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends the boy Vetustinus, sends his three books On Free Will, and again commends Romanianus and his son Licentius.

### Latin text

Vetustinum, impiis quoque miserabilem puerum, uestrae benignitati caritatique commendo. causas calamitatis et peregrinationis eius audietis ex ipso. nam et propositum eius, quo seruiturum se esse pollicetur deo, tempus prolixius et aetas robustior et transactus timor certius indicabunt. tres libros atque utinam tam grandis quaestionis ita explicatores ut grandes tanto minus metuens in te laborem legendi, quanto ardorem perspicio diligendi, misi sanctitati et caritati tuae; nam quaestio eorum est de libero arbitrio. hos aut non habere aut omnes non habere fratrem Romanianum scio, per quem prope omnia, quae quibuslibet auribus accommodata scribere potui, studio in nos tuo non adportanda dedi, sed legenda indicaui. habebat enim ille iam omnia secumque gestabat; per eum autem prima rescripta transmisi. credo iam expertam sanctitatem tuam sagacitate spiritali, quam tibi dominus tribuit, quid ille uir boni animo gerat et quae in illo infirmitate pars claudicet. unde humanitati et caritati tuae tam ipsum quam filium eius legisti, ut spero, qua sollicitudine commendauerim et quanta mihi necessitudine copulati sint. aedificet eos per te dominus. quod ab illo magis petendum est; nam id tu quam uelis, noui.

### English translation (Claude)

I commend to your kindness and love Vetustinus, a boy who would move even the impious to pity. You will hear the causes of his calamity and wanderings from himself. As for his resolution, by which he promises to serve God, a longer time, a sturdier age and the passing of his fear will show it more surely. I have sent to Your Holiness and Love three books (would that they were as great in explaining so great a question as they are great in size), fearing to impose on you the labour of reading them the less, the more I see your ardour of love; for their question is free will. I know that brother Romanianus either does not have them or does not have all of them; through him I made known to your zeal toward us almost everything I have been able to write that is suited to any readers, not to be brought to you, but for you to read. For he already had them all and carried them with him; through him, moreover, I sent my first reply. I believe Your Holiness has already found out, by the spiritual discernment the Lord has given you, what good that man bears in his mind and what part of him limps in weakness. Hence you have read, I hope, with what solicitude I commended both him and his son to your kindness and love, and by how close a tie they are bound to me. May the Lord build them up through you. This is rather to be asked of him; for I know how much you wish it.

### Translation notes

- The three books are On Free Will.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.7 (CSEL 34.2:6–7; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-7).

## Letter 31.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:7–8
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Paulinus for his work against the pagans and for Ambrose's books against those who claimed Christ learned from Plato.

### Latin text

Aduersus paganos te scribere didici ex fratribus. si quid de tuo pectore meremur, indifferenter mitte, ut legamus; nam pectus tuum tale domini oraculum est, ut ex eo nobis tantum placita et aduersus loquacissimas quaestiones explicatissima datum iri responsa praesumam. libros beatissimi papae Ambrosii credo habere sanctitatem tuam; eos autem multum desidero, quos aduersus nonnullos inperitissimos et superbissimos, qui de Platonis libris dominum profecisse contendunt, diligentissime et copiosissime scripsit.

### English translation (Claude)

I have learned from the brothers that you are writing against the pagans. If we deserve anything from your heart, send it to us to read without hesitation; for your heart is such an oracle of the Lord that I presume it will give us only pleasing answers, most clearly worked out against the most talkative questions. I believe Your Holiness has the books of the most blessed pope Ambrose; I greatly desire those which he wrote most carefully and copiously against certain most ignorant and most proud people who maintain that the Lord learned from the books of Plato.

### Translation notes

- 'Pope' (papa) was a title of honour for bishops. Ambrose's work against those who derived Christ's teaching from Plato is lost.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.8 (CSEL 34.2:7–8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-8).

## Letter 31.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:8
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends greetings from Severus of Milevis and the brothers, and a loaf of bread, to Paulinus and Therasia.

### Latin text

Beatissimus frater Seuerus de condiscipulatu nostro Mileuitanae antistes ecclesiae bene apud eandem ciuitatem fratribus cognitus debito nobiscum officio sanctitatem uestram salutat. fratres quoque omnes nobiscum domino seruientes tam id faciunt, quam uos desiderant, tam uos desiderant, quam uos diligunt, et tam diligunt, quam estis boni. panis, quem misimus, uberior benedictio fiet dilectione accipientis uestrae benignitatis. custodiat uos dominus ab ista generatione in aeternum, domini dilectissimi et sincerissimi, uere benigni et abundantissima domini gratia praestantissimi fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

The most blessed brother Severus, our former fellow disciple, now bishop of the church of Milevis and well known to the brothers in that city, greets Your Holiness with us with due respect. All the brothers too who serve the Lord with us do so as much as they long for you; they long for you as much as they love you, and love you as much as you are good. The bread we have sent will become a richer blessing through the love with which your Kindness receives it. May the Lord keep you from this generation for ever, most beloved and most sincere lords, truly kind brothers, most excellent in the abundant grace of the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Ps 12:7 (11:8 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ps 12:7 (LXX 11:8).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 31.9 (CSEL 34.2:8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/29-1/#p-31-9).

## Letter 32.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:8–9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus writes to Romanianus at Rome with the news, just received from Africa, that Augustine and his friends are now all bishops.

### Latin text

Pridie, quam has daremus, reuersis ex Africa fratribus nostris, quorum expectatione nos pendere uidisti, optatissime sanctorum et carissimorum uirorum inde epistulas receperamus, id est Aurelii, Alypii, Augustini, Profuturi, Seueri, iam omnium pariter episcoporum. ergo tot sanctorum talium recentissimis sermonibus gratulantes properauimus ad te nostram referre laetitiam, ut tibi quoque expectatum in peregrinatione sollicita gaudium festiuissimis conferremus indiciis. si forte eadem de uenerabilibus et amantissimis uiris per aliarum aduentus nauium comperisti, per nos etiam repetita accipe et quasi renouata hilaritate rursus exulta. quod si primus hic a nobis tibi nuntius ueniet, gratulare tantam nobis in tua patria caritatem Christo donante partam, ut, quicquid illic diuina prouidentia gerat mirabilis semper, ut scriptum est, in sanctis suis, uel primi uel cum primis sciamus.

### English translation (Claude)

The day before we sent this letter, our brothers returned from Africa, for whom you saw us waiting anxiously, and we received from there, as we had greatly desired, letters from holy and very dear men, namely Aurelius, Alypius, Augustine, Profuturus and Severus, all of them now bishops alike. So, rejoicing in the very recent words of so many such saints, we hastened to bring our joy to you, so that we might give you too, in your anxious stay abroad, the joy you were awaiting, with most festive tidings. If perhaps you have learned the same things about these venerable and most loving men through the arrival of other ships, receive them repeated by us too, and rejoice again with renewed gladness. But if this news comes to you first from us, rejoice that Christ has granted us such love won in your homeland that whatever divine providence does there, ever wonderful, as it is written, in his saints, we know either first or among the first.

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:35 (67:36 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Paulinus to Romanianus and Licentius (NPNF omits it). Allusion to Ps 68:35 (LXX 67:36).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 32.1 (CSEL 34.2:8–9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-1).

## Letter 32.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:9–10
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus rejoices that Augustine was made co-bishop with the living Valerius, an unusual arrangement, and sees in it God's work against the Donatists and Manichaeans.

### Latin text

Non autem tantum hoc scribimus gratulandum, quod episcopatum Augustinus acceperit, sed quod hanc dei curam meruerint Africanae ecclesiae, ut uerba caelestia Augustini ore perciperent, qui ad maiorem dominici muneris gratiam nouo more prouectus ita consecratus est, ut non succederet in cathedra episcopo, sed accederet. nam incolumi Valerio Hipponiensis ecclesiae coepiscopus Augustinus est. et ille beatus senex, cui purissimam mentem nulla umquam liuentis inuidiae macula suffudit, dignos sui cordis pace nunc ab altissimo fructus capit, ut quem successorem sacerdotii sui simpliciter optabat, hunc mereatur tenere collegam. credine hoc potuit, antequam fieret? sed in hoc quoque omnipotentis opere dici euangelicum illud potest: Hominibus haec ardua; apud deum autem omnia possibilia. exultemus itaque et laetemur in eo, qui facit mirabilia solus et qui facit unanimes habitare in domo, quoniam ipse respexit humilitatem nostram et uisitauit in bono plebem suam, qui erexit cornu in domo Dauid pueri sui et nunc exaltauit cornu ecclesiae suae in electis suis, ut cornua peccatorum, sicut per prophetam spondet, hoc est Donatistarum Manichaeorumque, confringat.

### English translation (Claude)

We write that this is a matter for rejoicing not only because Augustine has received the episcopate, but because the African churches have been found worthy of this care of God, to receive heavenly words from Augustine's mouth. For the greater grace of the Lord's gift he has been advanced in a new way, consecrated so that he did not succeed the bishop in his chair but joined him in it. For while Valerius is still alive, Augustine is co-bishop of the church of Hippo. And that blessed old man, whose most pure mind no stain of jealous envy ever clouded, now reaps from the Most High fruits worthy of the peace of his heart, in that he is found worthy to have as colleague the one he simply wished for as successor in his priesthood. Could this have been believed before it happened? But of this work of the Almighty too that gospel saying can be spoken: 'For men these things are hard, but with God all things are possible.' So let us exult and rejoice in him who alone does wonders and who makes those of one mind dwell in a house, because he has looked on our lowliness and visited his people for good, who raised up a horn in the house of his servant David, and has now exalted the horn of his church in his chosen ones, so that he may break the horns of sinners, as he promises through the prophet, that is, of the Donatists and Manichaeans.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:26: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:18 (71:18 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 68:6 (67:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Luke 1:48: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 1:68–69: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 75:10 (74:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 19:26; allusions: Ps 72:18; Ps 68:6; Luke 1:48, 68–69; Ps 75:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 32.2 (CSEL 34.2:9–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-2).

## Letter 32.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:10–11
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus hopes Licentius will hear Augustine's call, sends five loaves to Romanianus and Licentius, and turns to address Licentius.

### Latin text

Utinam haec nunc domini tuba, qua per Augustinum intonat, filii nostri Licentii pulset auditus, sed ut illa audiat aure, qua Christus ingreditur, de qua non rapit dei semen inimicus! tunc uere sibi summus Christi pontifex Augustinus uidebitur, quia tunc se et exauditum sentiet ab excelso, si, quem tibi dignum genuit in litteris, hunc et sibi digne filium pariat in Christo. nam et nunc, uelim credas, flagrantissima de ipso nobis sollicitudine scripsit. credimus in omnipotente Christo, quod adulescentis nostri uotis carnalibus spiritalia Augustini uota praeualeant. uincetur uel inuitus, mihi crede; uincetur piissimi parentis fide, ne mala uictoria uincat, si maluerit in perniciem suam uincere quam pro salute superari. ne uacuum fraternae humanitatis officium uideretur, de buccellato Christianae expeditionis, in cuius procinctu cotidie ad frugalitatis annonam militamus, panes quinque tibi pariter et filio nostro Licentio misimus; non enim potuimus a benedictione secernere, quem cupimus eadem nobis gratia penitus adnectere. paucis tamen et ad ipsum loquamur, ne neget sibi scriptum, quod de se tibi scriptum est. Aeschino enim dicitur, quod audit Micio. sed quid de alienis loquar, cum de proprio cuncta possimus et aliena loqui non soleat esse sani capitis? quo dei gratia sano et saluo sumus, quibus caput Christus est. incolumem te aetate quam plurima et beatum semper cum tota domo tua, ut cupimus, habeamus in Christo, domine frater merito honorandissime et desiderantissime.

### English translation (Claude)

Would that this trumpet of the Lord, with which he now thunders through Augustine, might strike the hearing of our son Licentius, but so that he might hear it with that ear by which Christ enters, from which the enemy does not snatch the seed of God! Then Augustine will truly seem to himself a high priest of Christ, for then he will feel that he has been heard on high, if the one whom he begot for you, worthy in letters, he also brings forth worthily for himself as a son in Christ. For even now, believe me, he has written to us with most burning concern for him. We believe in the almighty Christ that Augustine's spiritual prayers will prevail over the carnal wishes of our young man. He will be conquered even against his will, believe me; he will be conquered by the faith of his most devoted parent, lest a bad victory win, if he prefers to conquer to his own ruin rather than to be overcome for his salvation. So that the duty of brotherly kindness might not seem empty, we have sent five loaves to you and to our son Licentius alike, from the hardtack of the Christian campaign, in whose array we serve daily for the ration of frugality; for we could not separate from the blessing one whom we desire to bind closely to us by the same grace. But let us also speak a few words to him, lest he deny that what is written to you about him is written to him. For what Micio hears is said to Aeschinus. But why should I speak of other people's things, when we can say everything from our own, and to speak what belongs to others is not usually the mark of a sound head? By God's grace we are sound and safe in our head, we whose head is Christ. May we have you safe for as long a life as possible, and always happy with your whole house, as we desire, in Christ, lord brother, deservedly most honoured and most longed for.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:19: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Ad. (Terence): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Micio and Aeschinus are characters of Terence's Adelphoe; the point is that words addressed to the father are meant for the son. 'To speak what belongs to others' (aliena loqui) puns on 'to rave'. Allusion to Matt 13:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 32.3 (CSEL 34.2:10–11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-3).

## Letter 32.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:11–12
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus urges Licentius to follow Augustine, his spiritual father and mother, so as to become a true consul and pontiff in Christ.

### Latin text

Audi ergo, fili, legem patris tui, id est fidem Augustini et noli repellere consilia matris tuae, quod aeque nomen in te Augustini pietas iure sibi uindicat, qui te tantillum sinu gestauit suo et a paruulis primo lacte sapientiae saecularis inbutum nunc etiam spiritalibus lactare et enutrire domino gestit uberibus, quoniam te adultum aetate corporea in spiritalibus adhuc cunabulis uagientem uidet, adhuc infantem uerbo dei, uixdum in Christo primis passibus et uestigio titubante repentem, si tamen Augustini doctrina tamquam manus matris et ulna nutricis instabilem regat paruulum. quem si audias et sequaris, ut rursum te sermone Salomonis alliciam, fili, coronam accipies gratiarum tuo uertici. et tunc uere eris ille non phantasmate somniatus sed ab ipsa ueritate formatus consul et pontifex uacuas imagines falsi operis implente Christo solidis suae operationis effectibus. uere enim pontifex et uere consul Licentius erit, si Augustini uestigiis propheticis et apostolicis disciplinis ut sacrato beatus Helisaeus Heliae, ut inlustri apostolo Timotheus adulescens adhaereas indiuulso per itinera diuina comitatu, ut et sacerdotium corde perfecto discas mereri et populis ad salutem magistro ore consulere.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear, then, my son, the law of your father, that is, the faith of Augustine, and do not reject the counsels of your mother; for Augustine's love may equally claim that name by right in your case, since he carried you, such a little one, in his bosom, and, having fed you from infancy with the first milk of worldly wisdom, now longs to nurse and nourish you for the Lord with spiritual breasts too, because he sees you, grown in bodily age, still wailing in spiritual cradles, still an infant in the word of God, scarcely crawling in Christ with first steps and faltering tread, if only Augustine's teaching, like a mother's hand and a nurse's arm, may guide the unsteady little one. If you hear and follow him, then, to entice you again with the words of Solomon, my son, you will receive a crown of graces for your head. And then you will truly be that consul and pontiff, not dreamed of in a phantasm but formed by Truth itself, Christ filling the empty images of a false work with the solid effects of his own work. For Licentius will truly be pontiff and truly consul if you cling to Augustine's footsteps, to prophetic and apostolic disciplines, as blessed Elisha to holy Elijah, as young Timothy to the illustrious apostle, in undivided companionship along the divine ways, so that you may learn with a perfect heart to deserve the priesthood and with a teacher's mouth to counsel the peoples for their salvation.

### Scripture references

- Prov 1:8–9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 19:19–21: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Prov 1:8–9; allusions to Elisha and Elijah (1 Kgs 19:19–21) and to Timothy and Paul. 'Consul and pontiff' apparently refers to Licentius's worldly ambitions (perhaps a dream); the reference is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 32.4 (CSEL 34.2:11–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-4).

## Letter 32.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:12–18
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus addresses Licentius in prose and in elegiac verse, urging him to leave Rome and worldly ambition, take Christ's yoke, and follow Augustine and his kinsman Alypius.

### Latin text

Sat hoc monitis et hortatui; modico enim sermone et labore arbitror, mi Licenti, ad Christum posse incitari iam a pueris ad studia ueritatis et sapientiae, quod utrumque uere Christus est et omnis boni summum bonum, uenerabilis Augustini spiritu et ore flammatum. qui si parum apud te pro te ualuit, quid ego tanto interuallo posterior et omnium illius opum pauper efficiam? sed quia et illius facultatis potentia et tui ingenii humanitate confisus pleniora atque maiora in te spero elaborata quam elaboranda, ausus sum hiscere duplici gratia, ut et illi uiro debita caritate compararer in sollicitudine tui et inter eos, qui salutem tuam diligunt, uel contestato numerarer affectu. nam effectus in tui perfectione palmam Augustino potissimum destinatam scio. uereor, fili, ne aures tuas asperitate temerarii sermonis offenderim et per aures animo etiam tuo taedii mei uulnus intulerim. sed in mentem uenit epistulae tuae, qua te musicis familiarem modis intellexi, a quo studio ego aeui quondam tui non abhorrui. itaque mihi ad tuam mentem, si in aliquo exulcerassem, deleniendam remedium litteras tuas recordatus repperi, ut te ad dominum harmoniae omniformis artificem modulamine carminis euocarem. quaeso te, ut aure audias neque causam salutis tuae in uerbis meis spernas, sed piam curam et mentem paternam etiam in despiciendis sermonibus libenter accipias, quibus insitum Christi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, hanc deberi uenerationem facit, ut non possit a credente contemni. Quare age rumpe moras et uincla tenacia saecli nec metuas placidi mite iugum domini. pulchra quidem sed mira uagis praesentia rerum mentibus, at sapiens non stupet ista animus. nunc te sollicitat uariis malesuada figuris heu! ualidos etiam uertere Roma potens. sed tibi, nate, precor, semper pater Augustinus occurset cunctas urbis ad inlecebras. illum tanta inter fragilis discrimina uitae aspiciens et habens pectore tutus eris. hoc tamen et repetens iterumque iterumque monebo, ut fugias durae lubrica militiae. blandum nomen honos, mala seruitus, exitus aeger, quem nunc uelle iuuat, mox uoluisse piget. scandere celsa iuuat, tremor est descendere celsis; si titubes, summa peius ab arce cades. nunc tibi falsa placent bona, nunc rapit omnibus auris ambitus et uitreo fert caua fama sinu. ast ubi te magno damnosus cinxerit aestu balteus et sterilis fregerit inde labor, serus et in cassum spes accusabis inanes et modo, quae nectis, rumpere uincla uoles. tunc reminisceris frustra patris Augustini contempsisse dolens ueridicos monitus. quare si sapiens et si pius es, puer, audi et cape uerba patrum consiliumque senum. quid retrahis fera colla iugo? mea sarcina lenis, suaue iugum, Christi est uox pia; crede deo et caput adde iugis, da mollibus ora capistris demissosque leui subde humeros oneri. nunc potes hoc, dum liber agis, dum nulla retentant uincula, nulla tori cura nec altus honor. haec bona libertas Christo seruire et in ipso omnibus esse supra. non dominis hominum, non uitiis seruit, non regibus ille superbis, tantum qui Christo se dederit domino. nec tibi nobilitas uideatur libera, quam nunc sublimem attonita conspicis urbe uehi, quam cernis tanta sibi libertate uideri, ut dedignetur flectere colla deo. multis ille miser mortalibus et quoque seruis seruit et ancillas, ut dominentur, emit. norunt eunuchos et magna palatia passi et quisquis Romam sponte miser patitur, quanto sudoris pretio damnoque decoris constet ibi chlamydis, hic honor officii. nec tamen ipse potens, qui celsior omnibus esse emerit, ut nulli seruiat, adsequitur. cum bene se tota dominum iactauerit urbe, seruit daemoniis, si simulacra colit. pro dolor! hos propter remoraris in urbe, Licenti, et regnum Christi spernis, ut his placeas? hos uocitas dominos curua et ceruice salutas, quos ligni seruos conspicis et lapidis? nomine diuino argentum uenerantur et aurum, religio est, quod amat morbus auaritiae. inprecor, hos ut amet, qui non amat Augustinum, non colat et Christum, cui placet hos colere. inde ait ipse deus dominis non posse duobus seruiri, quoniam mens placet una deo. una fides, deus unus et unicus e patre Christus, haud duplex uni seruitus est domino. quanta etenim caelo ac terris distantia, tanta est Caesaris et Christi rebus et imperiis. tollere humo, sed nunc, dum spiritus hos regit artus, mente polum penetra, nil mora carnis obest. corporeis iam nunc morere actibus et bona uitae caelestis liquido praemeditare animo. spiritus es, quamquam tenearis corpore, si nunc mente pia uictor carnis opus perimas. haec tibi, care puer. fido compulsus amore scripsi; si recipis, suscipiere deo. crede Augustinum tibi nunc in me geminatum, sume duos una cum pietate patres. spernimur, abstraheris maiore dolore duobus; audimur, pignus dulce duobus eris. in te laeta patrum sudauit cura duorum et tibi magnus honos laetificasse duos. sed me Augustino cum copulo, non meritorum iacto parem, solo comparo amore tui. nam quid ego adfundam rorans tibi paupere riuo? me praeter gemino flumine prolueris: frater Alypius est Augustinusque magister, sanguinis hic consors, hic sator ingenii. tanto fratre uales et praeceptore, Licenti, et dubitas pennis talibus astra sequi? quicquid agas — nam te nec speret mundus amicum —, non daberis terrae debita Christo anima. tu thalamos licet et celsos mediteris honores nunc, olim domino restituere tuo. credo unum uincent iusti duo peccatorem et tua fraternae uota preces abigent. ergo redi, qua uoce parens, qua sanguine frater, ambo sacerdotes, te remeare iubent. ad tua te retrahunt, nam nunc aliena petessis: haec mage, quae retinent regna tui, tua sunt. haec repete, his inhia, externis ne contere tempus; si tua nolueris, quisquam aliena dabit? non eris ipse tuus missusque per extera longe sensibus heu! proprii pectoris exul ages. sollicitum satis haec nato cecinisse parentem, dum tibi, quae mihimet, uel uolo uel metuo. haec tibi, si recipis, feret olim pagina uitam; si rennuis, eadem haec pagina testis erit. incolumem mihi te, fili carissime, Christus annuat et seruum det sibi perpetuo. uiue, precor, sed uiue deo; nam uiuere mundo mortis opus, uiua est uiuere uita deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Enough of warnings and exhortation; for I think, my Licentius, that with little speech and labour one can be roused to Christ who has been fired from boyhood by the spirit and mouth of the venerable Augustine for the pursuit of truth and wisdom, both of which Christ truly is, the supreme good of all good. If he has availed too little with you on your own behalf, what shall I accomplish, so far behind him and poor in all his riches? But because, trusting both in the power of his ability and in the kindness of your nature, I hope that more and greater things have been worked in you than remain to be worked, I have dared to open my mouth for a double reason: that I might be likened to that man, with the love I owe, in concern for you, and that I might be counted, at least by an attested affection, among those who love your salvation. For I know that the palm for bringing about your perfection is destined above all for Augustine. I fear, son, that I may have offended your ears with the harshness of rash speech, and through your ears have wounded your mind too with weariness of me. But your letter came to mind, from which I understood that you are familiar with musical measures, a study which I too once did not shrink from at your age. So, remembering your letter, I found a remedy to soothe your mind, if I had made it sore at all: to call you forth to the Lord, the craftsman of every form of harmony, by the measure of a poem. I ask you to hear with your ear and not to spurn the cause of your salvation in my words, but to receive gladly a loving care and a fatherly mind even in words that might be despised, in which the name of Christ, which is above every name, makes this reverence due, so that it cannot be despised by a believer.

Come then, break off delay and the tenacious bonds of the world, and do not fear the gentle yoke of the mild Lord. The present beauty of things is lovely indeed, but it amazes only wandering minds; the wise mind is not dazzled by it. Now mighty Rome, alas, ill-counselling, tempts you with various figures, able to overturn even the strong. But I pray, son, that father Augustine may always come to meet you amid all the enticements of the city. Looking on him amid such great dangers of fragile life, and holding him in your heart, you will be safe. Yet this I will warn you, repeating it again and again: flee the slippery ways of hard service. Honour is a flattering name, a bad slavery, a sick ending; what you now delight to want, you will soon regret having wanted. It is pleasant to climb the heights, but it is terror to come down from the heights; if you stumble, you will fall the worse from the highest citadel. Now false goods please you, now ambition snatches you with every breeze, and hollow fame carries you in its glassy bosom. But when the ruinous belt of office has girded you with great heat, and fruitless labour has then broken you, late and in vain you will blame your empty hopes and wish to break the bonds you are now tying. Then you will remember, grieving in vain, that you despised the truthful warnings of father Augustine. So, if you are wise, if you are dutiful, boy, hear and take in the words of fathers and the counsel of elders. Why do you draw back your wild neck from the yoke? 'My burden is light, my yoke is sweet': it is the loving voice of Christ. Trust God and put your head to the yoke, give your mouth to the soft halter and put your lowered shoulders under the light load. You can do this now, while you live free, while no bonds hold you back, no care of a marriage bed nor lofty honour. This is good freedom: to serve Christ and in him to be above all things. He serves not the masters of men, not vices, not proud kings, who has given himself to Christ alone as Lord. Nor let the nobility seem free to you, which you now see, astonished, borne aloft through the city, which, you see, thinks itself so free that it disdains to bend its neck to God. That wretch serves many mortals, even slaves, and buys maidservants to be his masters. Those know who have endured eunuchs and great palaces, and whoever wretchedly endures Rome of his own will, at what price of sweat and loss of dignity the official cloak costs there, and here the honour of office. Yet not even the powerful man who has bought his way to be higher than all, so as to serve no one, attains it. Though he boasts himself lord through the whole city, he serves demons, if he worships images. Alas! is it for these that you linger in the city, Licentius, and spurn the kingdom of Christ to please them? Do you call these men masters and greet them with bent neck, whom you see to be slaves of wood and stone? They venerate silver and gold with a divine name; what the disease of avarice loves is their religion. I pray that he who does not love Augustine may love these, and that he who likes to worship these may not worship Christ either. Hence God himself says that two masters cannot be served, since an undivided mind pleases God. One faith, one God, and Christ the only one from the Father: no double service is due to the one Lord. For as great as is the distance between heaven and earth, so great is the distance between the affairs and empires of Caesar and of Christ. Lift yourself from the ground; even now, while breath rules these limbs, pierce the sky with your mind; the delay of the flesh is no hindrance. Die already now to bodily deeds and with a clear mind meditate beforehand on the goods of the heavenly life. You are spirit, though held by a body, if now with a pious mind you victoriously destroy the work of the flesh. These things, dear boy, I have written to you, compelled by faithful love; if you receive them, you will be received by God. Believe that Augustine is now doubled for you in me; take two fathers with one devotion. If we are spurned, you will be torn away to the greater grief of two; if we are heard, you will be a sweet pledge to two. The joyful care of two fathers has sweated over you, and it will be a great honour for you to have gladdened two. But when I join myself to Augustine, I do not boast myself his equal in merits; I compare myself with him only in love for you. For what can I pour on you, sprinkling from a poor stream? Besides me you are washed by a double river: brother Alypius and master Augustine, the one sharing your blood, the other the sower of your talent. You are strong in such a brother and such a teacher, Licentius, and do you hesitate to follow the stars on such wings? Whatever you do (for let not the world hope for you as a friend), you will not be given to the earth, a soul owed to Christ. Though you now contemplate marriage chambers and lofty honours, one day you will be restored to your Lord. I believe two righteous men will overcome one sinner, and fraternal prayers will drive away your wishes. So return, as your parent by his voice and your brother by blood, both priests, bid you return. They draw you back to what is your own, for now you seek what belongs to others; these things are rather yours, which the kingdoms keep for you. Seek these again, long for these, do not waste time on externals; if you will not have what is yours, will anyone give you what belongs to others? You will not be your own, and, sent far through foreign lands, alas, you will live an exile from the senses of your own heart. Enough for an anxious parent to have sung these things to his son, while I wish or fear for you what I wish or fear for myself. This page, if you receive it, will one day bring you life; if you refuse, this same page will be a witness. May Christ grant you to me safe, dearest son, and give you to himself as his servant for ever. Live, I pray, but live to God; for to live to the world is the work of death; to live to God is living life.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:30: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:24: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 115:4 (113:12 LXX): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Alypius was a kinsman of Licentius. The line 'these things are rather yours, which the kingdoms keep for you' (haec mage, quae retinent regna tui, tua sunt) is obscure and translated by sense. Allusions: Phil 2:9; Matt 11:30; Matt 6:24; Eph 4:5; Ps 115:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 32.5 (CSEL 34.2:12–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-32-5).

## Letter 33.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:18–19
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Proculeianus, Donatist bishop of Hippo, explaining that he honours him as a man of peaceable mind, though not his schism.

### Latin text

Propter inperitorum hominum uanitates diutius apud te de titulo epistulae meae disputare non debeo. cum enim nos reuocare inuicem ab errore conamur, quamuis ante plenissimam discussionem causae quibusdam uideri possit, quis nostrum erret, incertum, seruimus tamen inuicem nobis, si bono animo nobiscum agimus, ut a peruersitate discordiae liberemur. quod me sincero corde agere et cum tremore Christianae humilitatis, etiam si plerisque hominibus apertum non est, uidet tamen ille, cui nulla corda clauduntur. quid autem in te honorare non dubitem, facile intellegis. non enim errorem schismatis, unde omnes homines, quantum ad me adtinet, cupio sanari, dignum honore aliquo existimo; sed te ante omnia, quod ipsius nobis humanae societatis uinculo adstringeris et quod nonnulla in te praeminent placidioris mentis indicia, quibus nullo modo desperandum est facile te posse ueritatem, cum fuerit demonstrata, complecti, sine ullo aestu dubitationis honorandum puto. dilectionis autem tantum tibi debeo, quantum nobis ipse imperat, qui nos dilexit usque ad crucis opprobrium.

### English translation (Claude)

Because of the vanities of ignorant people I need not argue with you at length about the heading of my letter. For when we try to call each other back from error, although before the fullest discussion of the case it may seem uncertain to some which of us is in error, yet we serve each other, if we deal with each other in a good spirit, so that we may be freed from the perversity of discord. That I do this with a sincere heart and with the trembling of Christian humility, even if it is not plain to most people, he sees to whom no hearts are closed. And you easily understand what I do not hesitate to honour in you. For I do not consider the error of schism, from which I wish all people to be healed as far as it concerns me, worthy of any honour; but I think that you are to be honoured without any surge of hesitation, above all because you are bound to us by the very bond of human society, and because certain signs of a more peaceable mind stand out in you, which give no reason at all to despair that you may easily embrace the truth once it has been shown. And I owe you as much love as he himself commands us who loved us even to the reproach of the cross.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Proculeianus, Donatist bishop of Hippo; the heading discussed is not printed in the digital text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.1 (CSEL 34.2:18–19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-1).

## Letter 33.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:19
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine welcomes Proculeianus's reported willingness to confer before good men about the origin of the schism.

### Latin text

Sed ne mireris, quod apud beniuolentiam tuam diu tacui, non putabam in hac te esse sententia, quam mihi frater Euodius, cui fidem non habere non possum, gaudens indicauit. nam cum forte contigisset, ut in unam domum conueniretis, et sermo inter uos de spe nostra, hoc est de Christi hereditate ortus esset, ait dixisse benignitatem tuam uelle te bonis uiris sedentibus conferre nobiscum. quod te multum gaudeo nostrae humilitati offerre dignatum neque ullo modo possum tantam occasionem benigni animi tui deserere, ut, quantum uires dominus praebere dignabitur, quaeram tecum atque discutiam, quae causa, quae origo, quae ratio in ecclesia Christi, cui dixit: Pacem meam do uobis, pacem meam relinquo uobis, tam lugendae atque plangendae discissionis extiterit.

### English translation (Claude)

But do not be surprised that I have long been silent toward Your Benevolence; I did not think you were of the mind which brother Evodius, whom I cannot fail to trust, has joyfully reported to me. For when it happened by chance that you met in one house, and a conversation arose between you about our hope, that is, about the inheritance of Christ, he says that Your Kindness said you wished to confer with us in the presence of good men. I rejoice greatly that you have deigned to offer this to our lowliness, and I can in no way pass by so great an opportunity afforded by your kind mind; so that I may seek and discuss with you, as far as the Lord deigns to grant strength, what cause, what origin, what reason there was for so lamentable and deplorable a division in the church of Christ, to which he said: 'My peace I give you, my peace I leave you.'

### Scripture references

- John 14:27: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of John 14:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.2 (CSEL 34.2:19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-2).

## Letter 33.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:19–20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Proculeianus to excuse the frankness of Evodius in their discussion, since honest correction is better than flattery.

### Latin text

Audiui quidem de memorato fratre te fuisse conquestum, quod nescio quid tibi contumeliose responderit. quod, quaeso te, ne illam contumeliam deputes, quam certum mihi est non de superbo animo processisse — noui enim fratrem meum —, sed si quid in disputando pro fide sua et pro ecclesiae caritate dixit fortasse feruentius, quod tua grauitas nollet audire, non illa contumacia sed fiducia nominanda est. conlatorem enim et disputatorem, non assentatorem et adulatorem se esse cupiebat. nam hoc est oleum peccatoris, quo propheta non uult inpinguari caput; ita enim dicit: Emendabit me iustus in misericordia et arguet me: oleum autem peccatoris non inpinguet caput meum. mauult enim seuera misericordia iusti emendari quam leni adulationis unctione laudari. unde etiam illud propheticum est: Qui uos felices dicunt, in errorem uos mittunt. ideoque de homine, quem falsae blanditiae faciunt adrogantem, recte etiam uulgo dicitur: Creuit caput; inpinguatum est enim oleo peccatoris, hoc est non aspera ueritate corrigentis sed leni falsitate laudantis. neque hoc in eam partem peto accipias, quasi ego te a fratre Euodio tamquam a iusto emendatum intellegi uelim. uereor enim, ne me quoque aliquid contumeliose in te dicere existimes, quod uehementer caueo, quantum possum. sed iustus est ille, qui dixit: Ego sum ueritas. itaque de cuiuslibet hominis ore nobis uerum cum aliqua asperitate sonuerit, non ab illo homine, qui forte peccator est, sed ab ipsa ueritate, hoc est a Christo, qui iustus est, emendamur, ne nostrum caput blandae sed perniciosae adulationis unctio, hoc est oleum peccatoris inpinguet. quamquam etiam si frater Euodius aliquantum pro suae communionis defensione turbatior aliquid elatius animo commotiore dixisset, aetati hominis et necessitati causae te oporteret ignoscere.

### English translation (Claude)

I have heard indeed that you complained of the brother I mentioned, because he gave you some insulting answer. I beg you not to count as insult what I am sure did not proceed from a proud mind (for I know my brother); but if in disputing for his faith and for love of the church he said something more fervently, perhaps, than your gravity would have wished to hear, it should be called not insolence but confidence. For he wished to be a partner in discussion and debate, not an assenter and flatterer. For this is the oil of the sinner with which the prophet does not wish his head to be anointed; for he says: 'The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me; but let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head.' For he prefers to be corrected by the severe mercy of the righteous rather than praised with the smooth unction of flattery. Hence also that prophetic saying: 'Those who call you happy lead you into error.' And so of a man whom false flatteries make arrogant it is rightly said in common speech too: 'His head has swelled'; for it has been anointed with the oil of the sinner, that is, not of one who corrects with harsh truth but of one who praises with smooth falsehood. Do not take this to mean that I want you to be understood as corrected by brother Evodius as by a righteous man. For I fear you may think that I too am saying something insulting to you, which I take great care to avoid as far as I can. But he is righteous who said, 'I am the truth.' So when the truth sounds to us with some harshness from the mouth of any man, we are corrected not by that man, who may be a sinner, but by Truth itself, that is, by Christ, who is righteous, so that the anointing of soothing but ruinous flattery, that is, the oil of the sinner, may not anoint our head. And even if brother Evodius, somewhat agitated in defending his communion, had said something rather haughty with a more excited mind, you ought to pardon the man's age and the necessity of the cause.

### Scripture references

- Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 3:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 141:5 (LXX 140:5) and Isa 3:12 (Latin form); allusion to John 14:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.3 (CSEL 34.2:19–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-3).

## Letter 33.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:20–21
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes either a recorded conference before chosen witnesses or a private exchange of letters later read to both congregations.

### Latin text

Illud tamen, quod promittere dignatus es, peto memineris, ut sedentibus, quos ipse delegeris, dummodo uerba nostra non inaniter uentilentur, sed stilo excipiantur, ut et tranquillius et ordinatius disseramus et, si quid forte a nobis dictum de memoria lapsum fuerit, recitatione reuocetur, rem tam magnam et ad salutem omnium pertinentem cum concordia requiramus, aut, si placet, nullo medio interposito prius nobiscum siue per epistulas siue per conlocutionem atque lectionem, ubi placuerit, conferamus, ne forte intemperantes nonnulli auditores malint quasi nostrum expectare certamen, quam de sua salute in nostra conlocutione cogitare, ut, quod inter nos fuerit terminatum, postea per nos populus nouerit, aut, si per epistulas agi placet, ipsae plebibus recitentur, ut aliquando non plebes sed plebs una dicatur. prorsus sicut uolueris, sicut iusseris, sicut tibi placuerit, libenter amplector. et de animo beatissimi et uenerabilis mihi patris Valerii nunc absentis tota securitate polliceor hoc eum cum magna laetitia cogniturum; noui enim, quantum diligat pacem et nulla uani fastus inanitate iactetur.

### English translation (Claude)

But I ask you to remember what you deigned to promise: that in the presence of men whom you yourself choose, provided our words are not tossed about in vain but taken down in writing, so that we may discuss more calmly and in better order, and that anything we say that slips from memory may be recalled by reading, we may seek together in harmony so great a matter, which concerns the salvation of all. Or, if you prefer, let us first confer between ourselves with no one in between, either by letters or by conversation and reading, wherever you please, lest perhaps some intemperate hearers prefer to await what they think is our contest rather than to think about their own salvation in our conference; so that what is settled between us the people may afterwards learn through us; or, if you prefer it to be done by letters, let these be read to the congregations, so that at last we may speak not of congregations but of one congregation. In short, as you wish, as you order, as you please, I gladly embrace it. And concerning the mind of my most blessed and venerable father Valerius, now absent, I promise with complete confidence that he will learn of this with great joy; for I know how much he loves peace and is not puffed up by any emptiness of vain pride.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.4 (CSEL 34.2:20–21; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-4).

## Letter 33.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:21–22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine laments that the schism divides Christian households and that bishops who settle worldly disputes cannot agree about Christ himself.

### Latin text

Rogo te, quid nobis est cum ueteribus dissensionibus, ut huc usque uulnera illa durauerint, quae animositas hominum superborum nostris membris inflixit? quorum uulnerum putrefactione etiam dolorem perdidimus, quo solet medicus inplorari. uides, quanta et quam miserabili foeditate Christianae domus familiaeque turpatae sint. mariti et uxores de suo lecto sibi consentiunt et de Christi altari dissentiunt; per illum sibi iurant, ut inter se pacem habeant, et in illo habere non possunt; filii cum parentibus unam domum habent suam et domum dei non habent unam; succedere in eorum hereditatem cupiunt, cum quibus de Christi hereditate rixantur; serui et domini communem deum diuidunt, qui formam serui accepit, ut omnes seruiendo liberaret; honorant nos uestri, honorant uos nostri; per coronam nostram nos adiurant uestri, per coronam uestram uos adiurant nostri; omnium uerba suscipimus, neminem offendere uolumus; quid nos solus Christus offendit, cuius membra laniamus? et homines quidem causas suas saeculares apud nos finire cupientes, quo modo eis necessarii fuerimus, sic nos sanctos et dei seruos appellant, ut negotia terrae suae peragant: aliquando agamus et negotium salutis nostrae et salutis ipsorum. non de auro, non de argento, non de fundis et pecoribus, pro quibus rebus cotidie submisso capite salutamur, ut dissensiones hominum terminemus, sed de ipso capite nostro tam turpis inter nos et perniciosa dissensio est. quantum libet capita submittant, qui nos salutant, ut eos concordes in terra faciamus, de caelo usque ad crucem submissum est caput nostrum, in quo concordes non sumus.

### English translation (Claude)

I ask you, what have we to do with old dissensions, that those wounds which the animosity of proud men inflicted on our members should have lasted until now? Through the festering of those wounds we have even lost the pain that usually makes us call the physician. You see with how great and wretched a foulness Christian houses and households are disfigured. Husbands and wives agree about their bed and disagree about the altar of Christ; they swear to each other by him that they will have peace with each other, and in him they cannot have it. Children have one home with their parents and do not have one house of God; they wish to succeed to the inheritance of those with whom they quarrel over the inheritance of Christ. Slaves and masters divide the God they share, who took the form of a slave to free all by serving. Your people honour us, our people honour you; your people adjure us by our crown, our people adjure you by your crown; we accept everyone's words, we wish to offend no one: why does Christ alone offend us, whose members we tear apart? And people who wish to settle their worldly cases before us, as far as we are necessary to them, call us holy men and servants of God, so as to conclude the business of their land: let us at some time conduct the business of our own salvation and theirs. It is not about gold, not about silver, not about estates and cattle, for which matters we are greeted daily with bowed heads so that we may end people's disputes, but about our very Head that there is so shameful and ruinous a dissension among us. However low those who greet us bow their heads, that we may make them agree on earth, our Head bowed down from heaven to the cross, and in him we do not agree.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Our crown': the episcopal dignity, by which people swore. Bishops heard civil cases as arbitrators. Allusion to Phil 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.5 (CSEL 34.2:21–22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-5).

## Letter 33.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:22–23
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appeals to Proculeianus's reputed kindness to agree to a peaceful discussion for the sake of the people.

### Latin text

Rogo te atque obsecro, si est in te aliqua humanitas, quam multi praedicant, hic appareat bonitas tua, si non propter honores transitorios simulatur, ut contremescant in te uiscera misericordiae et uelis aliquando rem discuti instando nobiscum orationibus et omnia pacifice conferendo, ne miserae plebes, quae nostris honoribus obsequuntur, premant nos obsequiis suis in iudicio dei, sed potius nostra non ficta caritate nobiscum reuocatae ab erroribus et dissensionibus in ueritatis et pacis itinera dirigantur. opto te coram oculis dei beatum esse, domine honorabilis et dilectissime.

### English translation (Claude)

I ask and implore you, if there is in you any of the humanity that many praise, let your goodness appear here, if it is not feigned for the sake of passing honours: let the heart of mercy tremble within you, and be willing at last for the matter to be discussed, pressing on with us in prayers and conferring peaceably about everything, lest the wretched peoples who pay deference to our honours weigh us down with that deference at the judgment of God; but rather, called back with us by our unfeigned love from errors and dissensions, may they be directed into the ways of truth and peace. I wish you to be happy before the eyes of God, honourable and most beloved lord.

### Scripture references

- Col 3:12: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Echo of Col 3:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 33.6 (CSEL 34.2:22–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-33-6).

## Letter 34.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:23
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Eusebius, an official at Hippo, that he seeks no forced conversions but only the open declaration of the truth.

### Latin text

Scit deus, cui manifesta sunt arcana cordis humani, quantum pacem diligo Christianam, tantum me moueri sacrilegis eorum factis, qui in eius dissensione indigne atque impie perseuerant, eumque motum animi mei esse pacificum neque me id agere, ut ad communionem catholicam quisquam cogatur inuitus, sed ut omnibus errantibus aperta ueritas declaretur et per nostrum ministerium deo iuuante manifestata se amplectendam atque sectandam satis ipsa persuadeat.

### English translation (Claude)

God knows, to whom the secrets of the human heart are manifest, that as much as I love Christian peace, so much am I moved by the sacrilegious deeds of those who persist unworthily and impiously in dissension from it; and that this emotion of my mind is peaceable, and that I am not working for anyone to be forced into Catholic communion against his will, but for the truth to be plainly declared to all who are in error, so that, made manifest through our ministry with God's help, it may itself sufficiently persuade them to embrace and follow it.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Eusebius, a Catholic layman of rank at Hippo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.1 (CSEL 34.2:23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-1).

## Letter 34.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:23–24
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports a young man who beat his mother, threatened to kill her, and was received and rebaptized by the Donatists.

### Latin text

Quid enim execrabilius, quaeso te, ut alia taceam, quam id, quod nunc accidit? corripitur ab episcopo suo iuuenis crebris caedibus matris insanus et impias manus nec illis diebus, cum etiam seueritas legum sceleratissimis parcit, a uisceribus, unde natus est, reuocans; minatur eidem matri se in partem Donati translaturum et eam, quam incredibili furore solet caedere, perempturum; minatur ei, transit ad partem Donati, rebaptizatur furens et in maternum sanguinem fremens albis uestibus candidatur; constituitur intra cancellos eminens atque conspicuus et omnium gementium oculis matricidii meditator tamquam renouatus opponitur.

### English translation (Claude)

For what, I ask you, is more execrable, to say nothing of other things, than what has just happened? A young man is rebuked by his bishop for madly beating his mother again and again, and for not withholding his impious hands from the womb from which he was born, not even on those days when the severity of the laws spares the most wicked; he threatens that same mother that he will go over to the party of Donatus and kill her, whom he is accustomed to beat with incredible fury. He threatens her, goes over to the party of Donatus, is rebaptized in his rage, and, roaring for his mother's blood, is clothed in white garments; he is placed within the chancel rails, prominent and conspicuous, and, though plotting matricide, is set before the eyes of all, who groan, as one renewed.

### Translation notes

- 'Those days': probably the days of Easter, when criminal proceedings were suspended. The newly baptized wore white for eight days.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.2 (CSEL 34.2:23–24; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-2).

## Letter 34.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:24–25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine imagines the young man's reasoning in going over to the Donatists and warns that he may now carry out his threat against his mother.

### Latin text

Haecine tandem tibi placent, uir grauissime? nequaquam hoc de te crediderim; noui considerationem tuam. caeditur mater carnalis in membris, quibus genuit et nutriuit ingratum; prohibet hoc ecclesia, mater spiritalis; caeditur et ipsa in sacramentis, quibus genuit et nutriuit ingratum. nonne tibi uidetur dixisse parricidaliter frendens: Quid faciam ecclesiae, quae me prohibet caedere matrem meam? inueni, quid faciam: iniuriis, quibus potest, etiam ipsa feriatur; fiat in me aliquid, unde membra eius doleant; uadam mihi ad eos, qui nouerunt exsufflare gratiam, in qua ibi natus sum, destruere formam, quam in utero eius accepi; ambas matres meas saeuis cruciatibus torqueam; quae me posterior peperit, efferat prior; ad huius dolorem spiritaliter moriar, ad illius caedem carnaliter uiuam. quid aliud expectamus, uir honorabilis Eusebi, nisi ut in miseram mulierem senectute decrepitam, uiduitate destitutam, a cuius caedibus in catholica prohibebatur, iam Donatista securus armetur? quid enim aliud furibundo corde concepit, cum diceret matri: Transferam me in partem Donati et bibam sanguinem tuum? ecce iam conscientia cruentus, ueste dealbatus perficit partem pollicitationis suae; restat pars altera, ut matris sanguinem bibat. si ergo placent ista, urgeatur a clericis et sanctificatoribus suis, ut intra octauas suas totum, quod uouit, exoluat.

### English translation (Claude)

Do these things please you, after all, most grave man? I would never believe this of you; I know your thoughtfulness. A mother in the flesh is beaten in the members with which she bore and nourished an ingrate; the church, his spiritual mother, forbids it; she too is beaten in the sacraments with which she bore and nourished an ingrate. Does he not seem to you to have said, gnashing his teeth like a parricide: 'What shall I do to the church, which forbids me to beat my mother? I have found what to do: let her too be struck with whatever injuries can be inflicted; let something be done in me to make her members ache; I will go to those who know how to blow upon the grace in which I was born there, and to destroy the form I received in her womb; I will torture both my mothers with cruel torments; let the one who bore me second bury the one who bore me first; to the grief of the one I will die spiritually, to the slaughter of the other I will live carnally.' What else do we expect, honourable Eusebius, but that now, as a Donatist, he will arm himself without fear against the wretched woman, decrepit with old age and bereft by widowhood, whom in the Catholic Church he was restrained from beating? For what else did he conceive in his raging heart when he said to his mother, 'I will go over to the party of Donatus and drink your blood'? See, now, bloody in conscience and whitened in his garment, he fulfils part of his promise; the other part remains, that he drink his mother's blood. If these things please, then, let him be urged by his clerics and sanctifiers to fulfil his whole vow within his octave.

### Translation notes

- 'Blow upon the grace' refers to the exsufflation used in rebaptism; 'within his octave': within the eight days after his rebaptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.3 (CSEL 34.2:24–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-3).

## Letter 34.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he cannot be silent, and that he had the crime entered in the public records so that no one could say he invented it.

### Latin text

Potens est quidem dextera domini, quae furorem illius a misera uidua et desolata compescat et eum, quibus modis nouit, a tam scelerata dispositione deterreat. uerum tamen ego tanto animi dolore percussus quid facerem, nisi saltem loquerer? an uero ista illi faciunt et mihi dicitur: Tace? auertat a me dominus hanc amentiam, ut, cum ipse mihi imperet per apostolum suum et dicat ab episcopo refelli oportere docentes, quae non oportet, ego illorum indignationibus territus taceam. quod enim publicis gestis haerere uolui tam sacrilegum nefas, ad hoc utique uolui, ne me quisquam maxime in aliis ciuitatibus, ubi opportunum fuerit, ista deplorantem fingere aliquid arbitretur, quando etiam apud ipsam Hipponem iam dicitur non hoc Proculianum mandasse, quod publicum renuntiauit officium.

### English translation (Claude)

The right hand of the Lord is indeed able to restrain his fury from the wretched and desolate widow, and to deter him, in ways he knows, from so wicked a design. Yet, struck with such grief of mind, what should I do, if not at least speak? Or do they do these things and am I told, 'Be silent'? May the Lord turn away from me this madness, that, when he himself commands me through his apostle and says that those who teach what they should not must be refuted by a bishop, I should be terrified by their indignation and keep silent. For my reason for wanting so sacrilegious a crime fixed in the public records was certainly this: that no one, especially in other cities, where it may be opportune for me to lament these things, should think I am inventing anything, since even at Hippo itself it is now being said that Proculianus did not give the instruction which the public official reported.

### Scripture references

- Titus 1:9–11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Titus 1:9–11. Proculianus (Proculeianus) is the Donatist bishop of Hippo (letter 33).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.4 (CSEL 34.2:25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-4).

## Letter 34.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:25–26
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Eusebius to find out from Proculianus whether he authorized his presbyter's statement, and accepts his proposal of a conference with ten witnesses from each side.

### Latin text

Quid autem modestius agere possumus, quam ut tam grauem causam per te tamen agam, uirum et clarissima dignitate praeditum et considerantissima uoluntate tranquillum? peto igitur, sicut iam petiui per fratres nostros, bonos atque honestos uiros, quos ad tuam eximietatem misi, ut quaerere digneris, utrum Proculiani presbyter Victor non hoc ab episcopo suo mandatum acceperit, quod officio publico renuntiauit, an forte, cum et ipse Victor aliud dixerit, falsum illi apud acta prosecuti sint, cum sint communionis eiusdem; aut, si consentit, ut ipsam totam quaestionem dissensionis nostrae placide pertractemus, ut error, qui iam manifestus est, manifestius innotescat, libenter amplector. audiui enim, quod dixerit, ut sine tumultu populari adsint nobiscum deni ex utraque parte graues et honesti uiri et secundum scripturas, quid in uero sit, perquiramus. nam illud, quod rursus eum dixisse nonnulli ad me pertulerunt, cur non ierim Constantinam, quando ibi plures ipsi erant, uel me debere ire Mileum, quod illic, sicut perhibent, concilium proxime habituri sunt, ridiculum est dicere, quasi ad me pertineat cura propria nisi Hipponiensis ecclesiae. mihi tota huius quaestionis ratio maxime cum Proculiano est. sed si forte inparem se putat, cuius uoluerit, collegae sui inploret auxilium. in aliis enim ciuitatibus tantum agimus, quod ad ecclesiam pertinet, quantum uel nos permittunt uel nobis inponunt earundem ciuitatium episcopi, fratres et consacerdotes nostri.

### English translation (Claude)

And what more moderate course can we take than to conduct so serious a case through you, a man of most distinguished rank and of calm and most considerate disposition? I ask, then, as I have already asked through our brothers, good and honourable men whom I sent to Your Excellency, that you deign to inquire whether Victor, Proculianus's presbyter, did not receive from his bishop the instruction which he reported to the public official, or whether perhaps, though Victor himself said something else, those officials entered something false in the record, although they are of the same communion. Or, if he agrees that we should calmly discuss the whole question of our dissension, so that the error, which is already manifest, may become known still more manifestly, I gladly embrace it. For I have heard that he said that ten grave and honourable men from each side should be present with us without popular tumult, and that we should search out according to the Scriptures what is true. As for what some have reported to me that he said besides, asking why I did not go to Constantina when many of them were there, or saying that I ought to go to Milevis, because, as they say, they are about to hold a council there, it is ridiculous to say this, as if any church but that of Hippo were my own care. For me the whole matter of this question lies chiefly with Proculianus. But if perhaps he thinks himself unequal to it, let him call on the help of whichever colleague he likes. For in other cities we do only as much of what concerns the church as the bishops of those cities, our brothers and fellow priests, either permit us or lay upon us.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.5 (CSEL 34.2:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-5).

## Letter 34.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:26–27
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine offers that, if Proculianus fears his learning, the unlettered Catholic bishop Samsucius of Turris will debate him instead.

### Latin text

Quamquam et iste, qui se tot annorum episcopum dicit, quid in me tirone timeat, quominus mecum uelit conferre sermonem, non satis intellego: si doctrinam liberalium litterarum, quas forte ipse aut non didicit aut minus didicit, quid hoc pertinet ad eam quaestionem, quae uel de sanctis scripturis uel documentis ecclesiasticis aut publicis discutienda est, in quibus ille per tot annos uersatur, unde in eis deberet esse peritior? postremo est hic frater et collega meus Samsucius, episcopus Turrensis ecclesiae, qui nullas tales didicit, quales iste dicitur formidare; ipse adsit, agat cum illo; rogabo eum et, ut confido in nomine Christi, facile mihi concedet, ut suscipiat in hac re uicem meam, et eum dominus pro ueritate certantem, quamuis sermone inpolitum, tamen uera fide eruditum, sicut confidimus, adiuuabit. nulla ergo causa est, cur ad alios nescio quos differat, ne inter nos, quod ad nos pertinet, peragamus. nec tamen, ut dixi, etiam illos defugio, si eorum ipse poscit auxilium.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet I do not well understand what this man, who calls himself a bishop of so many years, fears in me, a novice, that he does not wish to confer with me. If it is learning in the liberal arts, which perhaps he himself either did not learn or learned less, what has this to do with the question, which is to be discussed either from the holy Scriptures or from church or public documents, with which he has been occupied for so many years, so that he ought to be more skilled in them? Finally, there is here my brother and colleague Samsucius, bishop of the church of Turris, who has learned none of the things this man is said to fear; let him be present, let him debate with him. I will ask him, and, as I trust in the name of Christ, he will readily grant me this, to take my place in this matter; and the Lord will help him as he contends for the truth, unpolished in speech though he is, yet instructed in the true faith, as we trust. There is no reason, then, why he should put it off to some others or other, rather than settle between ourselves what concerns us. Yet, as I said, I do not avoid those others either, if he asks for their help.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 34.6 (CSEL 34.2:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/32-1/#p-34-6).

## Letter 35.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:27–28
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Eusebius that he asked him not to judge but only to put a question to Proculianus, and that Proculianus now knows of the matricidal young man and should exclude him.

### Latin text

non ego recusanti uoluntati tuae iudicium, sicut dicis, inter episcopos subeundum molestus exhortator aut deprecator inposui. quod quidem etiam si suadere uoluissem, possem fortasse facile ostendere, quam ualeas iudicare inter nos in tam manifesta atque aperta causa et quale sit illud, quod facis, ut non auditis partibus iam ferre non dubites pro una parte sententiam, qui iudicium reformidas. sed hoc, ut dixi, interim omitto. nihil autem rogaueram aliud honorabilem benignitatem tuam, quod quaeso tandem in hac saltem epistula digneris aduertere, nisi ut quaereres a Proculiano, utrum hoc ipse dixerit Victori presbytero suo, quod ab eo sibi dictum publicum officium renuntiauit, an forte, qui missi sunt, non quod a Victore audierunt, sed falsum gestis prosecuti sint; deinde quid illi de tota ipsa quaestione inter nos discutienda uideretur. arbitror autem non iudicem fieri eum, qui rogatur, ut interroget aliquem et, quod ei responsum fuerit, rescribere dignetur. hoc ergo etiam nunc rogo, ut facere non graueris, quia litteras meas, sicut etiam expertus sum, non uult accipere. quod si uoluisset, non utique per tuam eximietatem id agerem. cum autem id non uult, quid possum mitius agere, quam ut per te, talem uirum et qui eum diligis, interrogetur aliquid, unde me tacere mea sarcina prohibet? quod autem mater a filio caesa tuae grauitati displicuit, sed ille dixisti si sciret, a communione sua tam nefarium iuuenem prohibiturus esset, breuiter respondeo: modo cognouit, modo prohibeat.

### English translation (Claude)

I did not, as you say, impose on your unwilling will, as a troublesome exhorter or petitioner, the task of judging between bishops. Even if I had wished to persuade you to it, I could perhaps easily show how well able you are to judge between us in so manifest and open a case, and what sort of thing it is that you do, in that you, who dread judgment, do not hesitate to pass sentence for one party without hearing the parties. But this, as I said, I leave aside for now. I had asked nothing else of your honourable Kindness (and I ask you to notice it at last, at least in this letter) except that you should inquire of Proculianus whether he himself said to his presbyter Victor what the public official reported Victor said to him, or whether perhaps those who were sent entered in the record not what they heard from Victor but something false; and then what he thought about discussing the whole question between us. And I do not think a man becomes a judge when he is asked to question someone and deign to write back the answer he received. This, then, I still ask you not to be unwilling to do, since he will not accept my letters, as I have also found by experience. Had he been willing, I would certainly not be doing this through Your Excellency. But since he is not willing, what milder course can I take than to have him questioned through you, such a man as you are and one who loves him, about something on which my burden forbids me to be silent? As for your saying that the mother beaten by her son displeased your gravity, but that he, if he knew, would bar so wicked a young man from his communion, I answer briefly: now he knows; now let him bar him.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Eusebius, answering his reply to letter 34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 35.1 (CSEL 34.2:27–28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-1).

## Letter 35.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:28–29
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports a deposed Catholic subdeacon, Primus, who was rebaptized by the Donatists with two nuns and now roams with the Circumcellions, and asks that Proculianus exclude him.

### Latin text

Addo etiam aliud. subdiaconus quondam Spaniensis ecclesiae uocabulo Primus cum ab accessu indisciplinato sanctimonialium prohiberetur atque ordinata et sana praecepta contemneret, a clericatu remotus est et ipse inritatus aduersus disciplinam dei transtulit se ad illos et rebaptizatus est. duas etiam sanctimoniales concolonas suas de fundo catholicorum Christianorum siue idem transtulit siue illum secutae etiam ipsae tamen rebaptizatae sunt et nunc cum gregibus Circumcellionum inter uagabundos greges feminarum, quae proterue maritos habere noluerunt, ne habeant disciplinam, in detestabilis uinolentiae bacchationibus superbus exultat gaudens latissimam sibi apertam esse licentiam malae conuersationis, unde in catholica prohibebatur. et hoc fortasse Proculianus ignorat. ergo per tuam grauitatem atque modestiam eidem in notitiam perferatur. iubeat eum, qui non ob aliud illam communionem delegit, nisi quia in catholica clericatum amiserat propter inoboedientiam et perditos mores, a sua communione remoueri.

### English translation (Claude)

I add something else. A former subdeacon of the church of Spanianum named Primus, when he was forbidden undisciplined access to nuns and despised orderly and sound precepts, was removed from the clergy; and he, angered against the discipline of God, went over to them and was rebaptized. Two nuns also, his fellow tenants on an estate belonging to Catholic Christians, either were taken over by him or followed him; at any rate they too were rebaptized. And now, with bands of Circumcellions, among wandering bands of women who shamelessly refused to have husbands so as not to have discipline, he exults proudly in the revels of detestable drunkenness, glad that the widest licence for wicked living, from which he was restrained in the Catholic Church, has been opened to him. And perhaps Proculianus does not know this. So let it be brought to his notice through your gravity and moderation. Let him order that this man, who chose that communion for no other reason than that he had lost his clerical office in the Catholic Church for disobedience and depraved conduct, be removed from his communion.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 35.2 (CSEL 34.2:28–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-2).

## Letter 35.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:29–30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts the Catholic practice of receiving degraded Donatist clergy only as penitents with the Donatist rebaptism of disciplined Catholics, who must declare themselves pagans.

### Latin text

Etenim ego, si domino placet, istum modum seruo, ut, quisquis apud eos propter disciplinam degradatus ad catholicam transire uoluerit, in humiliatione paenitentiae recipiatur, quo et ipsi eum forsitan cogerent, si apud eos manere uoluisset. ab eis uero considera, quaeso te, quam execrabiliter fiat, ut, quos male uiuentes ecclesiastica disciplina corripimus, persuadeatur eis, ut ad lauacrum alterum ueniant atque, ut id accipere mereantur, paganos se esse respondeant, quae uox ne procederet de ore Christiano, tantus sanguis martyrum fusus est, deinde quasi renouati et quasi sanctificati disciplinae, quam ferre non potuerunt, deteriores facti sub specie nouae gratiae sacrilegio noui furoris insultent. aut si male facio per tuam beniuolentiam ista corrigenda curare, de me nullus queratur, si haec illi perferri in notitiam per codices publicos fecero, qui mihi negari, ut arbitror, in Romana ciuitate non possunt. nam cum deus imperet, ut loquamur et praedicemus uerbum et docentes, quae non oporteat, refellamus et instemus opportune atque importune, sicuti dominicis et apostolicis litteris probo, nullus hominum mihi silentium de his rebus persuadendum arbitretur. uiolenter autem uel latrocinanter si quid audendum putauerint, non deerit dominus ad tuendam ecclesiam suam, qui iugo suo in gremio eius toto orbe diffuso omnia terrena regna subiecit.

### English translation (Claude)

For I, if it pleases the Lord, keep this rule: whoever among them has been degraded for discipline and wishes to pass over to the Catholic Church is received in the humiliation of penance, to which they too would perhaps have compelled him if he had wished to remain with them. But on their side, consider, I beg you, how execrable it is that those whom we rebuke by church discipline for living wickedly are persuaded to come to a second washing, and, so that they may be found worthy to receive it, answer that they are pagans (a word which so much blood of martyrs was shed to keep from coming out of a Christian mouth); and then, as though renewed and sanctified, having become worse, they insult, under the appearance of a new grace and with the sacrilege of a new madness, the discipline they could not bear. Or if I do wrong in taking care to have these things corrected through your goodwill, let no one complain of me if I have them brought to his notice through public records, which, as I think, cannot be denied me in a Roman city. For since God commands us to speak and preach the word, to refute those who teach what they should not, and to be urgent in season and out of season, as I prove from the writings of the Lord and the apostles, let no man think he can persuade me to be silent about these matters. But if they think they should venture something by violence or brigandage, the Lord will not fail to protect his church, who in her bosom, spread through the whole world, has subjected all earthly kingdoms to his yoke.

### Scripture references

- Titus 1:9–11: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Tim 4:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Penance' renders paenitentia, the church discipline. Allusions to Titus 1:9–11 and 2 Tim 4:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 35.3 (CSEL 34.2:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-3).

## Letter 35.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:30–31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that, though he forbade a Catholic father to force his Donatist daughter back, a Donatist presbyter publicly abused him as a traditor and persecutor.

### Latin text

Nam cum ecclesiae quidam colonus filiam suam, quae apud nos fuerat catechumena et ad illos seducta est inuitis parentibus, ut ibi baptizata etiam sanctimonialis formam susciperet, ad communionem catholicam paterna uellet seueritate reuocare et ego feminam corruptae mentis nisi uolentem et libero arbitrio meliora deligentem suscipi noluissem, ille rusticus etiam plagis instare coepit, ut sibi filia consentiret. quod statim omni modo fieri prohibui. tamen per Spanianum transeuntibus nobis presbyter ipsius stans in medio fundo catholicae ac laudabilis feminae uoce inpudentissima post nos clamauit, quod traditores et persecutores essemus, quod conuicium etiam in illam feminam iaculatus est, quae communionis est nostrae, in cuius medio fundo stabat. quibus uocibus auditis non solum me ipsum a lite refrenaui, sed etiam multitudinem, quae mihi comitabatur, compescui. et tamen si dicam: quaeratur, qui sint uel fuerint traditores uel persecutores, respondetur mihi: disputare nolumus et rebaptizare uolumus; nos oues uestras insidiantibus morsibus luporum more depraedemur, uos, si boni pastores estis, tacete — quid enim aliud mandauit Proculianus, si uere ipse mandauit? —; si Christianus es, serua hoc iudicio dei, nisi nos faciamus; tu tace. ausus etiam idem presbyter homini rusticano conductori fundi ecclesiae comminari.

### English translation (Claude)

For when a certain tenant of the church wished, with fatherly severity, to call back to Catholic communion his daughter, who had been a catechumen with us and had been drawn away to them against her parents' will, so that she was baptized there and even took the habit of a nun; and I had refused to receive a woman of corrupted mind unless she came willingly and chose the better course by free will; the peasant began even to press her with blows to make her agree with him. I at once forbade this to be done in any way. Nevertheless, as we were passing through Spanianum, their presbyter, standing in the middle of the estate of a Catholic and praiseworthy woman, shouted after us in a most impudent voice that we were traditors and persecutors; and he hurled this insult even at that woman, who is of our communion, in the middle of whose estate he stood. Hearing these words, I not only restrained myself from strife but also checked the crowd that accompanied me. And yet if I say, 'Let it be inquired who are or were traditors or persecutors', the answer I get is: 'We do not want to dispute, and we want to rebaptize; let us prey on your sheep with the lurking bites of wolves; you, if you are good shepherds, be silent' (for what else did Proculianus instruct, if he really did instruct it?); 'if you are a Christian, keep this for the judgment of God; whatever we may do, you be silent.' The same presbyter even dared to threaten a peasant who was a lessee of a church estate.

### Scripture references

- John 10:12: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Traditors': those who had handed over the Scriptures in the persecution, the Donatists' charge against the Catholics. 'Whatever we may do' renders the obscure 'nisi nos faciamus'. Echo of John 10:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 35.4 (CSEL 34.2:30–31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-4).

## Letter 35.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Eusebius to pass these complaints to Proculianus and report his answer.

### Latin text

Haec quoque omnia per te, quaeso, nouerit Proculianus; coherceat insaniam clericorum suorum, unde, honorabilis Eusebi, non apud te tacui. dignaberis itaque, non quid tu de his omnibus sentias, ne tibi arbitreris a me iudicis onus inponi, sed quid illi respondeant, mihi rescribere. misericordia dei te incolumem tueatur, domine eximie et merito suscipiende ac dilectissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

Let Proculianus also learn all these things through you, I beg; let him restrain the madness of his clerics, about which, honourable Eusebius, I have not kept silent with you. You will deign, then, to write back to me not what you yourself think of all these things, lest you suppose that I am laying on you the burden of a judge, but what they answer. May the mercy of God keep you safe, excellent lord and brother, deservedly to be esteemed and most beloved.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 35.5 (CSEL 34.2:31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-35-5).

## Letter 36.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:31–32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the young presbyter Casulanus, apologizing for not replying to his first letter.

### Latin text

Nescio, unde sit factum, ut primis tuis litteris meas non redderem; non tamen tui contemptu id fecisse me scio; nam et studiis tuis et ipso sermone delector teque in ista aetate iuuenali proficere in uerbo dei et abundare ad aedificationem ecclesiae et opto et exhortor. nunc uero scriptis tuis alteris sumptis, quibus tibi tandem aliquando responderi iure caritatis, in qua unum sumus, fraterno et aequissimo flagitas, differendum tuae dilectionis ulterius desiderium non putaui et inter artissimas occupationes meas suscepi isto me apud te debito absoluere.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not know how it happened that I did not answer your first letter; yet I know that I did not do it out of contempt for you; for I delight both in your studies and in your very style, and I both wish and urge that at this youthful age you may make progress in the word of God and abound in it for the building up of the church. But now that I have received your second letter, in which you demand, by the brotherly and most just right of the love in which we are one, that you be answered at long last, I did not think the desire of Your Love should be put off any longer, and amid my most pressing occupations I have undertaken to free myself of this debt to you.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Casulanus, a young presbyter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.1 (CSEL 34.2:31–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-1).

## Letter 36.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers that fasting on Saturday is not unlawful in itself, but that where Scripture is silent the custom of the church is to be followed without contention.

### Latin text

Qnod ergo me consulis, utrum liceat sabbato ieiunare, respondeo: si nullo modo liceret, profecto quadraginta continuos dies nec Moyses nec Helias nec ipse dominus ieiunasset. uerum ista ratione concluditur etiam dominico die non inlicitum esse ieiunium. et tamen quisquis hunc diem ieiunio decernendum putauerit, sicut quidam ieiunantes sabbatum obseruant, non paruo scandalo erit ecclesiae nec inmerito. in his enim rebus, de quibus nihil certi statuit scriptura diuina, mos populi dei uel instituta maiorum pro lege tenenda sunt. de quibus si disputare uoluerimus et ex aliorum consuetudine alios inprobare, orietur interminata luctatio, quae labore sermocinationis cum certa documenta nulla ueritatis insinuet, utique cauendum est, ne tempestate contentionis serenitatem caritatis obnubilet. quod periculum uitare neglexit, cuius mihi prolixam disputationem, ut ei responderem, cum tuis prioribus litteris existimasti esse mittendam.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your question whether it is permitted to fast on the Sabbath, I answer: if it were in no way permitted, certainly neither Moses nor Elijah nor the Lord himself would have fasted for forty continuous days. But by this reasoning it is also concluded that fasting on the Lord's day is not unlawful. And yet whoever thinks this day should be appointed for fasting, as some fast on the Sabbath, will be no small scandal to the church, and not without reason. For in those matters about which divine Scripture has established nothing certain, the custom of the people of God or the institutions of our forefathers are to be held as law. If we wish to dispute about these and to condemn some people by the custom of others, an endless struggle will arise; and since, for all the labour of argument, it instils no certain proofs of truth, we must surely take care that it does not cloud the serenity of love with a storm of contention. This danger was neglected by the man whose lengthy disputation you thought should be sent to me with your earlier letter, so that I might answer it.

### Scripture references

- Exod 34:28: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 19:8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 4:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Sabbath' (sabbatum) here means Saturday; the Roman church fasted on Saturdays, most other churches did not. Allusions to the forty-day fasts of Moses (Exod 34:28), Elijah (1 Kgs 19:8) and Christ (Matt 4:2).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.2 (CSEL 34.2:32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-2).

## Letter 36.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:32–33
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that the Roman writer's tract, by equating not fasting with drunkenness, insults the whole church and even the Romans on the days they do not fast.

### Latin text

Non autem usque adeo mihi spatia temporum larga sunt, ut ea refellendis singulis sententiis eius inpendam, quae aliis operibus magis urguentibus explicandis habeo necessaria. sed eo quo te mihi in tuis epistulis ostendis ingenio, quod in te donum dei admodum diligo, eundem sermonem cuiusdam, ut scribis, urbici paulo diligentius ipse considera et uidebis eum paene uniuersam Christi ecclesiam ab ortu solis usque ad occasum uerbis iniuriosissimis nequaquam lacerare timuisse. nec dixerim paene uniuersam sed plane uniuersam. nam neque ipsis, quorum consuetudinem sibi uidetur defendere, inuenitur pepercisse Romanis, sed, quo modo in eos quoque redundet conuiciorum eius impetus, nescit, quoniam non aduertit. nam cum eum argumenta deficiunt, quibus probet sabbato ieiunandum, in luxurias epularum et temulenta conuiuia et nequissimas ebrietates insultabundus inuehitur, quasi non ieiunare hoc sit inebriari. quod si hoc est, quid ergo prodest Romanis sabbato ieiunare, quando quidem aliis diebus, quibus non ieiunant, necesse est eos secundum disputationem huius ebriosos et uentricolas iudicari? porro si aliud est grauare corda in crapula et ebrietate, quod semper est malum, aliud est autem modestia et temperantia custodita relaxare ieiunium, quod certe, cum fit die dominico, reprehensorem non habet Christianum, prandia prius sanctorum a uoracitate et ebriositate uentricolarum iste discernat, ne Romanos ipsos, quando non ieiunant, uentricolas faciat, et tunc inquirat, non utrum liceat inebriari sabbato, quod nec dominico licet, sed utrum nec sabbato ieiunandum sit, sicut dominico non solet.

### English translation (Claude)

But I do not have such ample time as to spend on refuting his individual statements the time I need for completing other works that press more urgently. But with the talent you show me in your letters, a gift of God in you which I greatly love, consider a little more carefully yourself this discourse of a certain man of the city, as you write, and you will see that he did not at all fear to tear apart with most insulting words almost the whole church of Christ from the rising of the sun to its setting. Nor should I say almost the whole, but plainly the whole. For he is not found to have spared even the Romans, whose custom he seems to be defending; but he does not know how the force of his abuse rebounds on them too, because he does not notice it. For when arguments fail him to prove that one must fast on the Sabbath, he inveighs insultingly against luxurious feasts, drunken banquets and most wicked drunkenness, as if not to fast were to get drunk. If that is so, what does it profit the Romans to fast on the Sabbath, since on the other days, on which they do not fast, they must by this man's argument be judged drunkards and belly-worshippers? Further, if it is one thing to weigh down the heart with surfeit and drunkenness, which is always bad, and another to relax the fast while keeping moderation and temperance, which certainly, when it is done on the Lord's day, has no Christian critic, let him first distinguish the meals of the saints from the voracity and drunkenness of belly-worshippers, lest he make the Romans themselves belly-worshippers when they do not fast; and then let him inquire, not whether it is permitted to get drunk on the Sabbath, which is not permitted on the Lord's day either, but whether one should refrain from fasting on the Sabbath, as one usually does on the Lord's day.

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:34: allusion, high confidence
- Mal 1:11: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The author of the tract is an unnamed 'man of the city' (urbicus), apparently of Rome. Allusion to Luke 21:34; 'from the rising of the sun to its setting' echoes Ps 113:3 and Mal 1:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.3 (CSEL 34.2:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-3).

## Letter 36.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:33–34
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine objects that the tract calls all Eastern and most Western Christians, who eat on Saturday, carnal, Judaizing and enslaved to the belly.

### Latin text

Quod utinam sic quaereret aut sic adfirmaret, ut toto terrarum orbe diffusam exceptis Romanis et adhuc paucis occidentalibus apertissime non blasphemaret ecclesiam. nunc uero quis ferat per omnes orientales et multos etiam occidentales populos Christianos de tot tantisque famulis famulabusque Christi sabbato sobrie modesteque prandentibus ab isto dici, quod in carne sint et deo placere non possint et quod de illis sit scriptum: Recedant iniqui a me, uiam eorum nosse nolo, et quod sint uentricolae Iudaeam ecclesiae praeponentes et ancillae filios et lege non iusta sed uoluptaria consulentes uentri, non disciplinae succumbentes, et quod caro sint et mortem sapiant et cetera huius modi, quae si de uno quopiam dei famulo diceret, quis eum audire, quis non deuitare deberet? cum uero his opprobriis atque maledictis insectatur ecclesiam per totum mundum fructificantem atque crescentem et die sabbati paene ubique prandentem, admoneo, quisquis est, ut sese cohibeat. nam cuius me nomen ignorare uoluisti, profecto de illo me iudicare noluisti.

### English translation (Claude)

Would that he inquired or asserted in such a way as not to blaspheme most openly the church spread throughout the whole world, apart from the Romans and a few other Westerners! As it is, who could bear this man saying of so many and such great men and women servants of Christ among all the Eastern and many Western Christian peoples, who take their meal soberly and modestly on the Sabbath, that they are in the flesh and cannot please God, that of them it is written, 'Let the wicked depart from me; I do not wish to know their way', that they are belly-worshippers who prefer Judaea to the church, sons of the slave woman, consulting the belly by a law not just but pleasure-seeking, not submitting to discipline, that they are flesh and savour of death, and other such things? If he said them of any single servant of God, who should listen to him, who should not avoid him? But since he assails with these reproaches and curses the church that bears fruit and grows throughout the world and takes its meal on the Sabbath almost everywhere, I warn him, whoever he is, to restrain himself. For in wishing me not to know his name, you surely did not wish me to pass judgment on him.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:8: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:22–31: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 8:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 119:115 (118:115 LXX): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Rom 8:8; Gal 4:22–31; Rom 8:6; Phil 3:19. The quotation 'Let the wicked depart from me ...' is not identified with certainty (compare Ps 119:115 and Ps 101:4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.4 (CSEL 34.2:33–34; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-4).

## Letter 36.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:34–35
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Sabbath signified rest and joy, that the law said nothing about eating or fasting on it, and that Christ's words on fasting do not concern the Sabbath.

### Latin text

Filius hominis, inquit, sabbati dominus est, in quo maxime bene quam male facere licet. si ergo male facimus, quando prandemus, nullo die dominico bene uiuimus. quod autem fatetur apostolos sabbato manducasse et dicit, ut tunc ieiunaretur, temporis non fuisse, propter quod ait dominus: Venient dies, ut auferatur ab eis sponsus, et tunc ieiunabunt filii sponsi, quia tempus gaudii et tempus est luctus, primum adtendere debuit, quod illic dominus de ieiunio, non de sabbati ieiunio loquebatur. deinde cum uult intellegi luctum ieiunio, cibo gaudium deputandum, cur non cogitat, quicquid est illud, quod significare deus uoluit in eo, quod scriptum est eum die septimo requieuisse ab omnibus operibus suis, non ibi luctum significatum esse sed gaudium? nisi forte dicturus est in illa requie dei et sanctificatione sabbati gaudium Iudaeis, luctum significatum esse Christianis. et tamen nec, quando sanctificauit deus diem septimum, quia in illo requieuit ab omnibus operibus suis, aliquid de ieiunio uel prandio sabbati expressit nec, cum postea populo Hebraeo de ipsius diei obseruatione mandauit, aliquid de alimentis uel sumendis uel non sumendis locutus est. uacatio tantum homini a suis uel seruilibus operibus imperatur, quam prior populus in umbra accipiens futurorum sic uacauit ab operibus, quem ad modum nunc Iudaeos uacare conspicimus non, ut putatur, Iudaeis carnalibus non recte intellegentibus, quod recte intellegunt Christiani. neque enim melius haec intellegimus quam prophetae, qui tamen eo tempore, quo ita fieri oportuit, seruauerunt hanc sabbati uacationem, quam Iudaei putant adhuc esse seruandam. unde illud est, quod lapidari deus hominem iussit, qui sabbato ligna collegerat; nusquam autem legimus lapidatum uel aliquo dignum supplicio iudicatum siue ieiunantem sabbato siue prandentem. quid tamen horum duorum quieti conueniat, quid labori, iste ipse uiderit, qui gaudium manducantibus, luctum ieiunantibus deputauit uel intellexit a domino deputari, ubi de ieiunio respondens ait: Non possunt lugere filii sponsi, quam diu cum eis est sponsus.

### English translation (Claude)

'The Son of Man', he says, 'is Lord of the Sabbath', on which it is permitted to do good rather than evil. If, then, we do evil when we take a meal, we never live well on the Lord's day. As for his admitting that the apostles ate on the Sabbath, and saying that it was not then the time for fasting, because of the Lord's words, 'The days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them, and then the sons of the bridegroom will fast', since there is a time of joy and a time of mourning: he ought first to have noticed that there the Lord was speaking of fasting, not of fasting on the Sabbath. Next, since he wants mourning to be understood by fasting, and joy to be attributed to food, why does he not reflect that, whatever it is that God wished to signify by what is written, that he rested on the seventh day from all his works, what is signified there is not mourning but joy? Unless perhaps he is going to say that in that rest of God and sanctification of the Sabbath joy was signified for the Jews and mourning for Christians. And yet neither when God sanctified the seventh day, because on it he rested from all his works, did he express anything about fasting or eating on the Sabbath, nor, when he later commanded the Hebrew people about the observance of that day, did he say anything about taking or not taking food. Only rest from one's own works, or from servile works, is commanded to man; and the former people, receiving it in the shadow of things to come, rested from works in the same way as we now see the Jews resting; not, as is thought, because the carnal Jews do not rightly understand what Christians rightly understand. For we do not understand these things better than the prophets, who nevertheless, at the time when it was proper to do so, kept this Sabbath rest which the Jews think must still be kept. Hence it is that God ordered a man to be stoned who had gathered wood on the Sabbath; but nowhere do we read that anyone was stoned or judged worthy of any punishment either for fasting or for eating on the Sabbath. Yet which of these two befits rest and which befits labour, let him see for himself, who has attributed joy to those who eat and mourning to those who fast, or understood the Lord to attribute it so, where in answer about fasting he says: 'The sons of the bridegroom cannot mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 3:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 2:2–3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:8–10: allusion, medium confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Num 15:32–36: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Matt 12:8 and Matt 9:15; allusions: Matt 12:12; Eccl 3:4; Gen 2:2–3; Exod 20:8–10; Col 2:17; Num 15:32–36. Augustine's remark about the 'carnal Jews' is part of his argument that the Sabbath rest was rightly kept in its time; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.5 (CSEL 34.2:34–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-5).

## Letter 36.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:35–36
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points out that on the same Sabbath the disciples both ate and plucked grain, suggesting that both Sabbath rest and Sabbath fasting are not binding.

### Latin text

Quod autem propterea dicit sabbato apostolos manducasse, quia nondum erat tempus, ut sabbato ieiunarent, quod scilicet ueterum traditio prohibebat, numquid ergo iam erat tempus, ut sabbato non uacarent? nonne et hoc ueterum traditio prohibebat et uacare cogebat? et tamen eo ipso sabbati die, quo Christi legimus manducasse discipulos, uulserunt utique spicas, quod sabbato non licebat, quia ueterum traditio prohibebat. uideat igitur, ne forte congruentius ei respondeatur ideo dominum die illo a discipulis haec duo fieri uoluisse unum de spicis uellendis alterum de alimentis sumendis, ut illud esset aduersus eos, qui uolunt sabbato uacare, hoc autem aduersus eos, qui cogunt sabbato ieiunare, cum illud mutato tempore iam superstitiosum esse significasset, hoc autem utroque tempore liberum esse uoluisset. neque id confirmando dixerim, sed, quid ei multo aptius, quam sunt ea, quae loquitur, responderi possit, ostenderim.

### English translation (Claude)

As for his saying that the apostles ate on the Sabbath because it was not yet the time for them to fast on the Sabbath, since, as he says, the tradition of the elders forbade it: was it then already the time for them not to rest on the Sabbath? Did not the tradition of the elders forbid this too and compel them to rest? And yet on the very Sabbath day on which we read that Christ's disciples ate, they certainly plucked ears of grain, which was not permitted on the Sabbath, because the tradition of the elders forbade it. Let him consider, then, whether it might not be answered him more fittingly that the Lord wished these two things to be done by the disciples on that day, the plucking of ears and the taking of food, the former against those who want to rest on the Sabbath and the latter against those who compel fasting on the Sabbath; since he had indicated that the former, with the change of times, was now superstitious, but wished the latter to be free in both times. I do not say this as asserting it, but to show what could be answered him much more aptly than the things he says.

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Matt 12:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.6 (CSEL 34.2:35–36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-6).

## Letter 36.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:36–37
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies that the Pharisee in the parable was faulted for his pride, not for fasting twice a week.

### Latin text

Quo modo, inquit, non cum Pharisaeo damnabimur bis in sabbato ieiunantes? tamquam Pharisaeus ideo damnetur, quia bis in sabbato ieiunabat, et non, quia super publicanum se tumidus extollebat. potest autem iste dicere etiam illos, qui omnium fructuum suorum decimas dant pauperibus, cum Pharisaeo damnari, quia hoc quoque ille inter sua opera praedicabat, quod cupimus a multis fieri Christianis et uix paucissimos inuenimus, aut uero, qui non fuerit iniustus, adulter et raptor, cum Pharisaeo damnabitur, quia ille se talem non esse iactabat; quod certe quisquis sentit, insanit. porro si haec sine dubio bona, quae sibi Pharisaeus inesse commemorabat, non habenda sunt cum superbiente iactantia, quae in illo apparebat, sed tamen habenda sunt cum pietate humili, quae in illo non aderat, sic et bis in sabbato ieiunare in homine, qualis fuerat ille Pharisaeus, infructuosum est, in homine autem humiliter fideli uel fideliter humili religiosum est. quamuis euangelica scriptura non dixerit damnatum Pharisaeum, sed magis iustificatum dixerit publicanum.

### English translation (Claude)

'How', he says, 'shall we not be condemned with the Pharisee, if we fast twice in the week?' As if the Pharisee were condemned because he fasted twice a week, and not because he puffed himself up above the tax collector. But by this reasoning he could say that those too who give tithes of all their produce to the poor are condemned with the Pharisee, because the Pharisee also proclaimed this among his works (something we wish many Christians would do, and we scarcely find a very few); or that whoever has not been unjust, an adulterer or a robber will be condemned with the Pharisee, because he boasted that he was not such: anyone who thinks this is certainly mad. Further, if these undoubtedly good things which the Pharisee said were in him are not to be had with the proud boasting that appeared in him, but are nevertheless to be had with the humble piety that was not present in him, so too fasting twice a week is fruitless in a man such as that Pharisee was, but in a humbly faithful, or faithfully humble, man it is a religious act. And yet the gospel did not say that the Pharisee was condemned, but rather that the tax collector was justified.

### Scripture references

- Luke 18:11–14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Twice in the week' renders bis in sabbato (Luke 18:12), where sabbatum means 'week'. Allusion to Luke 18:11–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.7 (CSEL 34.2:36–37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-7).

## Letter 36.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:37–38
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that one can surpass the Pharisee's fasting without fasting on Saturday or Sunday, as many monks do, yet the tract still condemns them.

### Latin text

Verum si hoc modo putauit iste intellegendum, quod ait dominus: Nisi abundauerit iustitia uestra plus quam scribarum et Pharisaeorum, non intrabitis in regnum caelorum, ut, nisi amplius quam bis in sabbato ieiunemus, hoc praeceptum non possimus implere, bene quod septem dies sunt, qui uolumine temporum per sua uestigia reuocantur. cum ergo ex his biduum quisque detraxerit, ne sabbato dominicoque ieiunet, remanent dies quinque, de quibus Pharisaeum superare possit bis in sabbato ieiunantem. puto enim, quod, si ter in sabbato quisque ieiunat, iam superat Pharisaeum, qui bis in sabbato ieiunabat. quod si et quater uel etiam, ut nullus dierum excepto sabbato et dominico praetermittatur, in hebdomade quinquies ieiunatur, quod multi tota uita sua faciunt maxime in monasterio constituti, non solum Pharisaeus, qui bis in sabbato ieiunabat, uerum etiam Christianus, qui quarta et sexta et ipso sabbato ieiunare consueuit, quod frequenter Romana plebs facit, in labore ieiunii superabitur. et tamen nescio quis iste, ut dicis, urbicus disputator, etiam si quisque continuis quinque praeter sabbatum et dominicum diebus ita ieiunet, ut nullo die corpus omnino reficiat, eum carnalem uocat, quasi cibus et potus ceteris diebus non pertineat ad carnem, et uentricolam iudicat, quasi solius sabbati prandium descendat in uentrem.

### English translation (Claude)

But if he thought the Lord's saying, 'Unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven', should be understood to mean that unless we fast more than twice a week we cannot fulfil this precept, it is well that there are seven days, which return along their own tracks in the turning of time. When, then, one has subtracted two days from them, so as not to fast on the Sabbath and the Lord's day, five days remain in which one can surpass the Pharisee who fasted twice a week. For I think that one who fasts three times a week already surpasses the Pharisee who fasted twice a week. But if one fasts four times, or even five times a week, so that no day except the Sabbath and the Lord's day is passed over (which many do all their life, especially those living in a monastery), not only the Pharisee who fasted twice a week, but also the Christian who is accustomed to fast on the fourth and sixth day and on the Sabbath itself, as the Roman people often do, will be surpassed in the labour of fasting. And yet this disputer from the city, as you call him, whoever he is, calls carnal even one who fasts on the five continuous days apart from the Sabbath and the Lord's day without refreshing his body at all on any of them, as if food and drink on the other days did not pertain to the flesh, and judges him a belly-worshipper, as if only the Sabbath meal went down into the belly.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 5:20. 'The fourth and sixth day': Wednesday and Friday.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.8 (CSEL 34.2:37–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-8).

## Letter 36.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:38–39
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the tract's demand for fasting six days a week condemns even the Roman church, where few fast so often.

### Latin text

Huic sane non sufficit, quod ad uincendum Pharisaeum iam sufficit, ut ter in sabbato ieiunetur, sed excepto dominico sex ceteris diebus ita ieiunare compellit, ut dicat: Antiqua remota labe duo in carne una Christi iam sub disciplina manentes non debent cum filiis sine lege et cum principibus Sodomorum et cum plebe Gomorrhae sabbatorum uoluptaria conuiuia exercere, sed cum sanctimonii incolis ac deo deuotis sollemni et ecclesiastico iure magis ac magis legitime ieiunare, ut sex dierum uel leuis error ieiunii, orationis et elemosynae fontibus abluatur, quo possimus dominica alogia refecti omnes aequali corde digne cantare: Saturasti, domine, animam inanem et potasti animam sitientem. ista dicens et a frequentia ieiunandi solum diem dominicum excipiens non tantum orientis et occidentis populos Christianos, in quibus sabbato nemo ieiunat, uerum et ipsam Romanam ecclesiam inprouidus et incautus accusat. cum enim dicit sub disciplina Christi manentes non debere cum filiis sine lege, cum principibus Sodomae, cum plebe Gomorrhae uoluptaria sabbatorum exercere conuiuia, sed cum sanctimonii incolis ac deo deuotis sollemni et ecclesiastico iure magis ac magis legitime ieiunare, ac deinde definiens, quid sit legitime ieiunare, subiungit et dicit ut sex dierum uel leuis error ieiunii, orationis et elemosynae fontibus abluatur, profecto eos, qui minus quam sex diebus in hebdomade ieiunant, non putat legitime exercere ieiunium nec deo esse deuotos nec maculas erroris, quae de ista mortalitate contrahuntur, abluere. uideant ergo Romani, quid agant, quia etiam ipsi nimium contumeliose huius disputatione tractantur, apud quos omnibus istis sex diebus praeter paucissimos clericos aut monachos quotusquisque inuenitur, qui frequentet cotidiana ieiunia, maxime quia ibi ieiunandum quinta sabbati non uidetur?

### English translation (Claude)

He is certainly not satisfied with what already suffices to surpass the Pharisee, fasting three times a week, but compels fasting on the other six days, apart from the Lord's day, saying: 'The old stain removed, two in the one flesh of Christ, now remaining under discipline, ought not to hold pleasure-seeking Sabbath banquets with the sons without law, with the princes of Sodom and the people of Gomorrah, but with the dwellers in holiness and those devoted to God ought to fast more and more lawfully by solemn and ecclesiastical right, so that even the slight error of six days may be washed away by the fountains of fasting, prayer and almsgiving, and we may all, refreshed by the Lord's-day alogia, sing worthily with equal heart: "You have satisfied, O Lord, the empty soul and given drink to the thirsty soul."' In saying this, and excepting only the Lord's day from frequent fasting, he improvidently and incautiously accuses not only the Christian peoples of the East and the West, among whom no one fasts on the Sabbath, but even the Roman church itself. For when he says that those remaining under the discipline of Christ ought not to hold pleasure-seeking Sabbath banquets with the sons without law, with the princes of Sodom, with the people of Gomorrah, but with the dwellers in holiness and those devoted to God ought to fast more and more lawfully by solemn and ecclesiastical right, and then, defining what it is to fast lawfully, adds 'so that even the slight error of six days may be washed away by the fountains of fasting, prayer and almsgiving', he clearly thinks that those who fast less than six days a week do not fast lawfully, are not devoted to God, and do not wash away the stains of error contracted from this mortal state. Let the Romans see what they are doing, then, since they too are treated very insultingly in this man's disputation; for among them, apart from a very few clerics or monks, how many are found who keep daily fasts on all those six days, especially since there it is not thought right to fast on the fifth day of the week?

### Scripture references

- Isa 1:10: echo, medium confidence
- Ps 107:9 (106:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Alogia is the tract's word for the Sunday feast (explained in 36.11). 'Two in the one flesh of Christ' is obscure (perhaps Jew and Gentile, Eph 2:15). Allusions to Isa 1:10 and quotation of Ps 107:9 (LXX 106:9). 'The fifth day of the week': Thursday.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.9 (CSEL 34.2:38–39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-9).

## Letter 36.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:39
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the tract's reasoning would make Saturday holier than the Lord's day.

### Latin text

Deinde quaero: si uniuscuiusque diei uel leuis error ipsius diei ieiunio soluitur uel abluitur — sic enim dicit: ut sex dierum uel leuis error ieiunii quoque fontibus abluatur —, quid faciemus de illo errore, qui subrepserit dominico die, in quo scandalum est ieiunare? aut si die ipso nullus Christianis error obrepit, uide, homo iste, qui uentricolas tamquam magnus ieiunator accusat, quantum honoris et utilitatis uentribus tribuat, si tunc non erratur, quando prandetur. an forte in ieiunio sabbati tantum bonum constituit, ut aliorum sex dierum, hoc est etiam ipsius dominici uel leuem, sicut dicit, errorem solum ieiunium sabbati possit abolere et solo ipso die non erretur, quo toto utique ieiunatur? quid est ergo quod diem dominicum sabbato uelut Christiano iure praeponit? ecce secundum ipsum dies sabbati multo sanctior inuenitur, in quo et non erratur, cum eius toto spatio ieiunatur, et eodem ieiunio sex ceterorum dierum ac per hoc et ipsius dominici error abluitur. puto, quod tibi non placeat ista praesumptio.

### English translation (Claude)

Next I ask: if the slight error of each day is loosed or washed away by that day's fasting (for so he says: 'so that even the slight error of six days may be washed away by the fountains of fasting'), what shall we do about the error that creeps in on the Lord's day, on which it is a scandal to fast? Or if no error creeps up on Christians on that day, see how much honour and benefit this man, who accuses belly-worshippers as though he were a great faster, gives to bellies, if there is no erring when one takes a meal. Or perhaps he places so great a good in the Sabbath fast that the Sabbath fast alone can abolish the 'slight error', as he calls it, of the other six days, that is, even of the Lord's day itself, and that only on that day, on which one fasts the whole day, there is no erring? Why then does he set the Lord's day above the Sabbath as by Christian right? See, according to him the Sabbath is found to be much holier, since on it there is no erring, because one fasts throughout it, and by that same fast the error of the other six days, and hence even of the Lord's day itself, is washed away. I think this presumption does not please you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.10 (CSEL 34.2:39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-10).

## Letter 36.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:39–40
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine mocks the tract's author, who condemns Saturday meals yet calls for a Sunday 'alogia', a feast beyond reason.

### Latin text

Iam uero cum se hominem spiritalem uideri uelit et tamquam carnales pransores sabbati accuset, adtende, quem ad modum dominici diei non parco prandio reficiatur, sed alogia delectetur. quid est autem alogia, quod uerbum ex Graeca lingua usurpatum est, nisi cum epulis indulgetur, ut a rationis tramite deuietur? unde animalia ratione carentia dicuntur aloga, quibus similes sunt uentri dediti. propter quod inmoderatum conuiuium, quo mens, in qua ratio dominatur, ingurgitatione uescendi ac bibendi quodam modo obruitur, alogia nuncupatur. insuper etiam propter cibum ac potum non mentis sed uentris alogia diei dominici dicit esse cantandum: Saturasti, domine, animam inanem et potasti animam sitientem. o uirum spiritalem! o magnum ieiunatorem! o carnalium reprehensorem et non uentricultorem! ecce qui nos admonet, ne lege uentris legem domini corrumpamus, ne panem caeli uendamus esca terrena, et adiungit: Quia esca Adam paradiso periit, esca Esau primatus amisit. ecce qui dicit: Est enim Satanae usitata calumnia temptatio uentris, cui modicum suadet, ut auferat totum. et horum, inquit, interpretatio praeceptorum uentricolas minus incuruat.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, though he wishes to appear a spiritual man and accuses those who eat on the Sabbath as carnal, notice how on the Lord's day he refreshes himself not with a sparing meal, but delights in alogia. And what is alogia, a word borrowed from the Greek language, except indulgence in feasting to the point of straying from the path of reason? Hence animals lacking reason are called aloga, and those given to the belly are like them. For this reason an immoderate banquet, in which the mind, where reason rules, is in a way overwhelmed by gorging on food and drink, is called alogia. Moreover, he says that, because of food and drink not of the mind but of the belly, this should be sung at the alogia of the Lord's day: 'You have satisfied, O Lord, the empty soul and given drink to the thirsty soul.' O spiritual man! O great faster! O reprover of the carnal, and no worshipper of the belly! See the man who warns us not to corrupt the law of the Lord by the law of the belly, not to sell the bread of heaven for earthly food, and adds: 'For by food Adam perished from paradise, by food Esau lost his birthright.' See the man who says: 'For the temptation of the belly is Satan's customary slander; he persuades it to take a little, in order to take away everything.' 'And the interpretation of these precepts', he says, 'bends the belly-worshippers less.'

### Scripture references

- Ps 107:9 (106:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gen 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 25:33–34: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Greek alogia means 'unreason'; aloga are irrational animals. Quotation of Ps 107:9 (LXX 106:9); allusions to Gen 3:6 and Gen 25:33–34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.11 (CSEL 34.2:39–40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-11).

## Letter 36.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:40–41
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that the Lord's day is above the Sabbath because of the resurrection, and that eating or fasting is good or bad according to the faith of the one who does it.

### Latin text

Nonne his uerbis suis id agere uidetur, ut etiam die dominico ieiunetur? alioquin sanctior erit sabbati dies, quo dominus in monumento requieuit, quam dominicus, quo a mortuis resurrexit. sanctius est enim profecto sabbatum, si secundum uerba huius in sabbato per ieiunium peccatum omne uitatur et, quod aliis diebus contractum est, aboletur, in dominico autem per escam uentris temptatio non cauetur et diabolicae calumniae locus datur et paradiso peritur et primatus amittitur. quid est ergo quod rursus sibi ipse contrarius admonet, ut non prandio moderato, sobrio, Christiano reficiamur dominico die, sed in alogia laetantes plaudentesque cantemus: Saturasti, domine, animam inanem et potasti animam sitientem? nempe si tunc non erramus, quando ieiunamus, et aliorum sex dierum errores tunc abluimus, cum sabbato ieiunamus, nullus erit die dominico deterior, nullus sabbato melior. crede, dilectissime frater, nemo legem sicut iste intellegit, nisi qui non intellegit. si enim Adam non cibus sed prohibitus cibus perdidit et Esau, nepotem sancti Abrahae, non esca sed usque ad contemptum sacramenti, quod in primatu suo habuit, concupita esca damnauit, sic a sanctis et fidelibus pie prandetur, quem ad modum a sacrilegis et incredulis impie ieiunatur. praeponitur autem dies dominicus sabbato fide resurrectionis, non consuetudine refectionis aut etiam uinolentae licentia cantionis.

### English translation (Claude)

Does he not by these words of his seem to be working to have fasting even on the Lord's day? Otherwise the Sabbath, on which the Lord rested in the tomb, will be holier than the Lord's day, on which he rose from the dead. For the Sabbath is certainly holier if, according to this man's words, on the Sabbath every sin is avoided by fasting and what was contracted on the other days is abolished, while on the Lord's day the temptation of the belly is not guarded against through food, place is given to the devil's slander, paradise is lost, and the birthright forfeited. Why then does he, contradicting himself, urge us to refresh ourselves on the Lord's day not with a moderate, sober, Christian meal, but to sing, rejoicing and applauding in alogia, 'You have satisfied, O Lord, the empty soul and given drink to the thirsty soul'? Surely, if we do not err when we fast, and if we wash away the errors of the other six days when we fast on the Sabbath, no day will be worse than the Lord's day and none better than the Sabbath. Believe me, dearest brother, no one understands the law as this man does except one who does not understand it. For if it was not food but forbidden food that destroyed Adam, and not food but food desired to the point of despising the sacrament he had in his birthright that condemned Esau, the grandson of holy Abraham, then the saints and faithful eat piously just as the sacrilegious and unbelieving fast impiously. And the Lord's day is set above the Sabbath by faith in the resurrection, not by the custom of refreshment or by the licence of drunken singing.

### Scripture references

- Gen 3:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 25:34: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.12 (CSEL 34.2:40–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-12).

## Letter 36.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:41–43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the argument from Moses's forty-day fast by noting that it included Sundays as well as Saturdays, as did Christ's.

### Latin text

Moyses, inquit, quadraginta diebus panem non manducauit nec bibit aquam cur autem hoc dixerit, subiunxit atque ait: Ecce Moyses, amicus dei, nubis inquilinus, delator legis et populi dux, ter bina sabbata ieiunio celebrans non offensam sed meritum conlocauit. numquid adtendit, quid hinc possit consequenter opponi? quia utique, si Moysi ieiunantis propterea proponit exemplum, quoniam in illis quadraginta diebus ter bina, sicut loquitur, sabbata ieiunauit, et ex hoc uult persuadere, ut sabbato ieiunetur, ex hoc ergo persuadeat, ut et dominico ieiunetur, quia in illis quadraginta diebus nihilo minus Moyses ter binos dominicos ieiunauit. sed addit ac dicit: Et adhuc cum Christo dominicus a deo imminenti ecclesiae seruabatur. quod cur dixerit, nescio: si enim propterea, quia multo magis ieiunandum est, posteaquam uenit cum Christo dominicus dies, ergo, quod absit, etiam ipso dominico die ieiunetur; si autem timuit, ne propter dierum quadraginta ieiunium obiceretur etiam dominico die ieiunandum, et ideo addidit, quod adhuc cum Christo imminenti ecclesiae dies dominicus seruabatur, ut uidelicet ea causa intellegatur ieiunasse Moyses etiam die, qui sequitur sabbatum, quia nondum uenerat Christus, per quem factus est ipse dies dominicus, quo non expedit ieiunare, quare ipse Christus quadraginta diebus similiter ieiunauit? cur non illis diebus in quadraginta ter binis, qui sabbatum sequebantur, ieiunium soluit, ut iam dominici diei prandium commendaret etiam ante suam resurrectionem, sicut sanguinem suum potandum dedit ante passionem? uides certe dierum quadraginta ieiunium, quod iste commemorat, sic ad rem non pertinere, ut sabbato ieiunemus, quo modo ad rem non pertinet, ut dominico ieiunemus.

### English translation (Claude)

'Moses', he says, 'did not eat bread or drink water for forty days.' And why he said this, he explains by adding: 'See, Moses, the friend of God, dweller in the cloud, bearer of the law and leader of the people, celebrating three pairs of Sabbaths with fasting, earned not offence but merit.' Did he notice what could consequently be objected from this? Surely, if he puts forward the example of Moses fasting because in those forty days he fasted on three pairs of Sabbaths, as he puts it, and from this wishes to persuade us to fast on the Sabbath, then from this let him persuade us to fast on the Lord's day too, because in those forty days Moses fasted no less on three pairs of Lord's days. But he adds and says: 'And the Lord's day was still being kept by God with Christ for the coming church.' Why he said this I do not know. If it is because one must fast much more after the Lord's day came with Christ, then, God forbid, let there be fasting even on the Lord's day itself; but if he feared that, because of the fast of forty days, it might be objected that one should fast on the Lord's day too, and therefore added that the Lord's day was still being kept with Christ for the coming church, so that Moses might be understood to have fasted even on the day that follows the Sabbath for this reason, that Christ had not yet come, through whom that Lord's day was made on which it is not fitting to fast: why then did Christ himself likewise fast for forty days? Why did he not break the fast on those six days in the forty which followed the Sabbath, so as to commend the Lord's-day meal even before his resurrection, as he gave his blood to drink before his passion? You surely see that the forty days' fast which this man mentions has no more to do with our fasting on the Sabbath than with our fasting on the Lord's day.

### Scripture references

- Exod 34:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:27–28: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Exod 34:28; allusions to Matt 4:2 and Matt 26:27–28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.13 (CSEL 34.2:41–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-13).

## Letter 36.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the tract confuses moderate Saturday meals with luxury and implies that eating on the Lord's day is sinful.

### Latin text

Prorsus non adtendit, quid ei de die dominico possit opponi, quando, sicut accusanda sunt ebriosa conuiuia et omnis uorax ac temulenta luxuries, sic accusat prandia sabbatorum, cum possint et ipsa esse modestorum atque sobriorum. et ideo non est illi ad singula respondendum, quoniam pro sabbati prandio uitia luxuriae reprehendendo eadem atque eadem saepe dicit aliud non inueniendo, quod dicat, nisi quod inaniter et ad rem non pertinens dicit. utrum non sit sabbato ieiunandum, quaeritur, non utrum non sit sabbato luxuriandum, quod nec dominico faciunt, qui deum timent, quamuis in illo utique non ieiunent. quis autem diceret, quod iste ausus est dicere? quo modo, inquit, pro nobis aut per nos rata erunt deo aut digna, quae nos sanctificata die ad peccatum cogunt? sanctificatam diem sabbati confitetur et ad peccatum dicit cogi homines, quia prandetur, ac per hoc secundum istum aut dies dominicus sanctificatus non est et incipit esse sabbatum melius aut, si est et dominicus dies sanctificatus, ad peccatum cogimur, quia prandemus.

### English translation (Claude)

He simply does not notice what can be objected to him about the Lord's day, when, just as drunken banquets and all voracious and drunken luxury are to be condemned, so he condemns Sabbath meals, though these too can be those of moderate and sober people. And so one need not answer him point by point, since in place of the Sabbath meal he rebukes the vices of luxury and says the same things over and over, finding nothing else to say except what is empty and irrelevant. The question is whether one should not fast on the Sabbath, not whether one should not indulge in luxury on the Sabbath, which those who fear God do not do on the Lord's day either, though on that day they certainly do not fast. But who would say what this man dared to say? 'How', he says, 'will things be ratified or worthy for God, for us or through us, which compel us to sin on a sanctified day?' He confesses that the Sabbath is a sanctified day and says that men are compelled to sin because they take a meal; and therefore, according to him, either the Lord's day is not sanctified and the Sabbath becomes better, or, if the Lord's day too is sanctified, we are compelled to sin because we take a meal on it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.14 (CSEL 34.2:43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-14).

## Letter 36.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:43–44
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the scriptural texts the tract cites against feasting concern sexual sin, idolatry and drunkenness, not eating on Saturday.

### Latin text

Et conatur testimoniis diuinis probare sabbato ieiunandum, sed, unde hoc probet, omnino non inuenit. manducauit, inquit, et bibit uinum Iacob et satiatus est et recessit a deo salutari suo et ceciderunt una die uiginti tria milia, quasi dictum sit: Prandit sabbato Iacob et recessit a deo salutari suo. et apostolus quando commemorauit cecidisse tot milia, non ait: Neque prandeamus sabbato, sicut illi pranderunt, sed ait: Neque fornicemur, sicut quidam eorum fornicati sunt et ceciderunt una die uiginti tria milia. quid sibi etiam uult, quod ait: Sedit autem populus manducare et bibere et surrexerunt ludere? posuit quidem et apostolus hoc testimonium, sed ut a seruitute idolorum, non a sabbati prandio prohiberet. sabbato autem illud factum esse iste non probat, sed, ut libitum est, suspicatur. sicut autem fieri potest, ut ieiunetur et, cum ieiunium soluitur, si quisque ebriosus est, tunc inebrietur, ita fieri potest, ut non ieiunetur et, si temperantes sunt homines, modestissime prandeatur. quid est ergo quod sabbati uolens persuadere ieiunium adhibet apostolum testem dicentem: Nolite inebriari uino, in quo est omnis luxuria, quasi dixerit: Nolite prandere sabbato, quia ibi est omnis luxuria. sicut autem hoc praeceptum apostolicum, ne inebrientur uino, in quo est omnis luxuria, obseruatur a Christianis deum timentibus, quando prandent die dominico, ita obseruatur, quando prandetur et sabbato.

### English translation (Claude)

He also tries to prove from divine testimonies that one must fast on the Sabbath, but he finds nothing at all to prove it from. 'Jacob ate', he says, 'and drank wine and was filled, and departed from God his saviour, and twenty-three thousand fell in one day'; as though it said, 'Jacob dined on the Sabbath and departed from God his saviour.' And the apostle, when he recalled that so many thousands fell, did not say, 'Neither let us dine on the Sabbath, as they dined', but, 'Neither let us commit sexual immorality, as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in one day.' And what does he mean by quoting, 'The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play'? The apostle too used this testimony, but to forbid the service of idols, not the Sabbath meal. That this happened on the Sabbath this man does not prove, but conjectures as he pleases. And just as it can happen that one fasts and, if one is a drunkard, gets drunk when the fast is broken, so it can happen that one does not fast and, if people are temperate, dines most modestly. Why then, in wishing to persuade us to fast on the Sabbath, does he bring in as witness the apostle saying, 'Do not get drunk with wine, in which is all debauchery', as if he had said, 'Do not dine on the Sabbath, for therein is all debauchery'? But just as this apostolic precept, not to get drunk with wine, in which is all debauchery, is observed by God-fearing Christians when they dine on the Lord's day, so it is observed when one dines on the Sabbath too.

### Scripture references

- Deut 32:15: quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 10:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:7: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 32:6: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The first text combines Deut 32:15 with 1 Cor 10:8. Quotations also of 1 Cor 10:7 (Exod 32:6) and Eph 5:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.15 (CSEL 34.2:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-15).

## Letter 36.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:44–46
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine dismisses the tract's examples of Elijah, Daniel and the three young men as irrelevant to fasting on Saturday.

### Latin text

Ut expressius, inquit, errantibus contradicam, nemo ieiunio deum, etsi non promeretur, offendet; porro et non offendere promereri est quis hoc diceret, nisi qui nollet considerare, quid diceret? ergo pagani quando ieiunant, non ideo magis offendunt deum aut, si de Christianis uoluit, quod dixit, intellegi, quis non deum offendit, si uelit cum scandalo totius, quae ubique dilatatur, ecclesiae die dominico ieiunare? deinde subiecit testimonia de scripturis ad causam, quam suscepit, nihil ualentia. ieiunio, inquit, Helias paradiso donatus in corpore regnat quasi ieiunium non praedicent, qui sabbato non ieiunant, sicut ieiunium praedicant, qui tamen die dominico non ieiunant, aut Helias eo tempore ieiunauerit, quo populus dei etiam sabbato ieiunabat. quod autem respondimus de quadraginta diebus ieiunii Moysi, hoc deputo esse respondendum etiam de quadraginta diebus Heliae. ieiunio inquit, Danihel leonum sicca rabie ora inlaesus euasit quasi legerit, quod sabbato ieiunauerit aut etiam cum ipsis leonibus sabbato fuerit, ubi tamen legimus, quod et prandent. ieiunio, inquit, trium fida germanitas ignibus coruscanti carceri dominata rogi hospitio susceptum dominum adorauit haec exempla sanctorum nec ad persuadendum cuiuscumque diei ieiunium ualent, quanto minus sabbati, quando quidem non solum non legitur tres uiros sabbato fuisse missos in caminum ignis ardentem, sed ne illud quidem legitur tam diu illic eos fuisse, ut posset eos quisquam dicere ieiunasse; immo uero uix unius horae spatium est, quo eorum confessio hymnusque cantatur, nec amplius inter illas flammas innoxias deambulauerunt, quam canticum illud terminauerunt, nisi forte ab isto etiam unius horae spatium ieiunio deputatur. quod si ita est, non habet, quod suscenseat pransoribus sabbati; usque ad horam enim prandii multo quam in illo camino prolixius ieiunatur.

### English translation (Claude)

'To contradict the erring more expressly,' he says, 'no one will offend God by fasting, even if he does not earn merit; and not to offend is itself to earn merit.' Who would say this, except one unwilling to consider what he was saying? So when pagans fast, do they not offend God the more? Or, if he wanted what he said to be understood of Christians, who does not offend God if he chooses to fast on the Lord's day, to the scandal of the whole church spread everywhere? Then he added testimonies from the Scriptures that have no force for the cause he took up. 'By fasting', he says, 'Elijah, granted paradise, reigns in the body'; as if those who do not fast on the Sabbath did not preach fasting, just as those preach fasting who nevertheless do not fast on the Lord's day; or as if Elijah fasted at a time when the people of God fasted on the Sabbath too. What we answered about Moses's forty days of fasting I think should be answered also about Elijah's forty days. 'By fasting', he says, 'Daniel escaped unharmed the mouths of lions with their dry rage'; as if he had read that he fasted on the Sabbath, or even that he was with those lions on the Sabbath, where in fact we read that he also dined. 'By fasting', he says, 'the faithful brotherhood of the three, mastering the prison flashing with fire, adored the Lord received as guest of the pyre.' These examples of the saints have no force to persuade us to fast on any day, how much less on the Sabbath, since not only is it not read that the three men were thrown into the burning fiery furnace on the Sabbath, but it is not even read that they were there long enough for anyone to say they fasted; indeed, the space in which their confession and hymn are sung is scarcely one hour, and they walked among those harmless flames no longer than it took to finish that song; unless perhaps this man counts even the space of one hour as a fast. If so, he has no reason to be angry with those who dine on the Sabbath; for until the hour of the meal one fasts much longer than they did in that furnace.

### Scripture references

- 2 Kgs 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 19:8: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:22: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:23–25: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Bel 33–39 (Bel and the Dragon): allusion, high confidence
- Pr Azar (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 2 Kgs 2:11 and 1 Kgs 19:8 (Elijah); Dan 6:22 (the lions' den), where Daniel is fed in the Greek addition Bel and the Dragon 33–39; Dan 3 (the furnace) and the hymn of the three in the Greek additions (Prayer of Azariah).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.16 (CSEL 34.2:44–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/35-1/#p-36-16).

## Letter 36.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:46–47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul's saying that the kingdom of God is not food and drink concerns scruples about foods, not fasting on Saturday.

### Latin text

Adhibet et illud apostoli testimonium, ubi ait: Non est regnum dei esca et potus sed iustitia et pax et gaudium in spiritu sancto, et regnum dei ecclesiam uult intellegi, in qua deus regnat. obsecro te, numquid hoc agebat apostolus, cum ista loqueretur, ut sabbato a Christianis ieiunaretur? sed nec de ipso cuiuscumque diei ieiunio loquebatur, cum haec diceret. dictum est enim aduersus eos, qui more Iudaeorum secundum ueterem legem in obseruatione quorundam ciborum putabant esse munditiam, et ad eorum fratrum admonitionem, per quorum escam et potum indifferenter acceptum scandalizabantur infirmi. ideo cum dixisset: Noli in esca tua illum perdere, pro quo Christus mortuus est, et: Non ergo blasphemetur bonum nostrum, tunc adiunxit: Non enim est regnum dei esca et potus et cetera. nam sicut iste uerba haec apostoli intellegit, ut regnum dei, quod est ecclesia, non sit in esca et potu sed in ieiunio, non dico sabbatis ieiunare, sed numquam omnino cibum ac potum sumere deberemus, ne de isto dei regno umquam recederemus. puto autem, quia isto confitente aliquanto religiosius die dominico ad ecclesiam pertinemus, quando tamen et ipso concedente prandemus.

### English translation (Claude)

He also brings in the apostle's testimony where he says, 'The kingdom of God is not food and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit', and wants the kingdom of God to be understood as the church, in which God reigns. I implore you, was the apostle aiming, when he said this, at having Christians fast on the Sabbath? He was not even speaking of fasting on any day at all when he said it. For it was said against those who, in the manner of the Jews according to the old law, thought there was purity in observing certain foods, and to admonish those brothers whose indifferent taking of food and drink scandalized the weak. So when he had said, 'Do not by your food destroy him for whom Christ died', and, 'So do not let our good be blasphemed', he then added, 'For the kingdom of God is not food and drink', and the rest. For if these words of the apostle are understood as this man understands them, that the kingdom of God, which is the church, is not in food and drink but in fasting, then we ought, I do not say to fast on Sabbaths, but never to take food and drink at all, lest we ever depart from this kingdom of God. But I think that, as he himself admits, we belong to the church somewhat more religiously on the Lord's day, when nevertheless, with his own concession, we dine.

### Scripture references

- Rom 14:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:15–16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Rom 14:17, 15–16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.17 (CSEL 34.2:46–47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-17).

## Letter 36.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:47–48
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the tract's appeal to Tobit and to the 'sacrifice of praise' by noting that praise is offered every day, especially in the fifty days after Easter when no one fasts.

### Latin text

Cur, inquit, sacrificium potiori domino carum murmuremus offerre, quod spiritus desiderat et angelus laudat? deinde adiungit angeli testimonium dicentis: Bona est oratio cum ieiunio et elemosyna. quid dixerit potiori domino nescimus, nisi forte scriptor errauit et te fugit, ut, quod mihi legendum misisti, non emendares. sacrificium ergo domino carum ieiunium uult intellegi, quasi de ieiunio uersetur haec quaestio et non de ieiunio sabbati. neque enim dominicus dies sine sacrificio, quod deo carum est, peragitur, quia non ieiunatur. sequitur adhuc et ingerit testimonia ad causam, quam defendendam suscepit, penitus aliena. immola, inquit, deo sacrificium laudis, et istam uocem diuini psalmi uolens ad quod agitur nescio quo modo conectere utique, inquit, non sanguinis aut ebrietatis conuiuium, quo non laudes debitae deo sed blasphemiae diabolo suffragante siluescunt o inprouidam praesumptionem! non ergo immolatur sacrificium laudis dominico die, quia non ieiunatur, sed agitur ebrietatis conuiuium et blasphemiae diabolo suffragante siluescunt. quod si nefas est dicere, intellegat non ieiunium significari in eo, quod scriptum est: Immola deo sacrificium laudis. ieiunium quippe certis diebus et maxime festis non agitur, sacrificium uero laudis ab ecclesia toto orbe diffusa diebus omnibus immolatur. alioquin, quod nullus non dico Christianus sed nec insanus dicere auderet, dies illi quinquaginta post pascha usque ad pentecosten, quibus non ieiunatur, erunt secundum istum a sacrificio laudis alieni. quibus tantum modo diebus in multis ecclesiis, in omnibus autem maxime cantatur alleluia, quam uocem laudis esse nullus Christianus quamlibet inperitus ignorat.

### English translation (Claude)

'Why', he says, 'should we murmur at offering to the more powerful Lord a dear sacrifice, which the Spirit desires and the angel praises?' Then he adds the testimony of the angel who says, 'Prayer is good with fasting and almsgiving.' What he meant by 'to the more powerful Lord' we do not know, unless perhaps the copyist made an error and it escaped you, so that you did not correct what you sent me to read. He wants fasting to be understood, then, as the sacrifice dear to the Lord, as if this question were about fasting and not about fasting on the Sabbath. For the Lord's day does not pass without a sacrifice dear to God just because there is no fasting. He goes on and piles up testimonies entirely foreign to the cause he undertook to defend. 'Offer to God a sacrifice of praise', he says; and wishing somehow to connect this verse of the divine psalm with the matter in hand, he says: 'certainly not a banquet of blood or drunkenness, in which, with the devil's support, not the praises due to God but blasphemies grow wild like a forest.' O improvident presumption! Is the sacrifice of praise, then, not offered on the Lord's day, because there is no fasting, but is a banquet of drunkenness held, and do blasphemies grow wild with the devil's support? If this is wicked to say, let him understand that fasting is not what is signified in the words, 'Offer to God a sacrifice of praise.' For fasting is not practised on certain days, especially feasts, but the sacrifice of praise is offered by the church spread throughout the world on all days. Otherwise (what no one, I do not say no Christian, but not even a madman would dare to say) those fifty days after Easter until Pentecost, on which there is no fasting, will according to him be strangers to the sacrifice of praise; yet it is on these days only that Alleluia is sung in many churches, and in all churches especially, and no Christian, however unskilled, is unaware that it is a word of praise.

### Scripture references

- Ps 50:14 (49:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 12:8 (Tobit): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The angel's saying is Tob 12:8. Quotation of Ps 50:14 (LXX 49:14).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.18 (CSEL 34.2:47–48; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-18).

## Letter 36.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:48–49
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that the tract allows a sober Sunday meal, and that the Roman church itself eats on three consecutive days each week.

### Latin text

Confitetur tamen etiam ipse die dominico non in ebrietate sed in iucunditate pranderi, cum dicit debere nos ex Iudaeis et gentibus multis Christiani nominis fide paucos electos uespertino sabbatorum incenso pro pecudum uictimis ieiunium deo placitum laudibus immolare, cuius feruore cremata deficiant opera delictorum. et mane, inquit, exaudiet nos a nobis auditus et erunt nobis domus ad manducandum et bibendum non in ebrietate sed in iucunditate dominica celebritate perfecta. tunc ergo eulogia, non, ut superius ait, alogia celebratur. sed quid eum offendit sabbati dies, quem deus sanctificauit, ignoro, ut in eo non putet posse manducari et bibi eum tali iucunditate, quae careat ebrietate, cum sic ante sabbatum ieiunare possimus, quo modo dicit ante dominicum sabbato ieiunandum. an continuo biduo prandere nefas esse arbitratur? uideat ergo, quanta afficiat contumelia ipsam quoque Romanam ecclesiam, ubi et his hebdomadibus, in quibus quarta et sexta et sabbato ieiunatur, tribus tamen continuis diebus, dominico scilicet ac deinde secunda tertiaque prandetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet he himself admits that on the Lord's day one dines not in drunkenness but in gladness, when he says that we, the few chosen from Jews and Gentiles by faith in the Christian name, ought to offer to God with praises, as the evening incense of the Sabbath instead of animal victims, a fast pleasing to God, by whose fervour the works of sins may be burnt up and fail. 'And in the morning', he says, 'he will hear us, as we have heard him, and we shall have houses to eat and drink in, not in drunkenness but in gladness, when the Lord's-day celebration is completed.' Then, therefore, a eulogia is celebrated, not, as he said above, an alogia. But what offends him in the Sabbath day, which God sanctified, I do not know, that he thinks one cannot eat and drink on it with a gladness free of drunkenness, since we could fast before the Sabbath in the same way as he says one should fast on the Sabbath before the Lord's day. Or does he think it wicked to dine on two consecutive days? Then let him see how great an insult he inflicts on the Roman church itself, where even in those weeks in which there is fasting on the fourth and sixth day and on the Sabbath, there is nevertheless dining on three consecutive days, namely the Lord's day and then the second and third days.

### Scripture references

- Ps 141:2 (140:2 LXX): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Eulogia ('blessing') is set against alogia ('unreason'). 'The evening incense' echoes Ps 141:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.19 (CSEL 34.2:48–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-19).

## Letter 36.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:49–50
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the tract's 'woe to those who call good evil' condemns the whole church, and that Paul forbids those who fast and those who eat to judge one another.

### Latin text

Omnium uitam certum est inquit, arbitrio pendere pastorum; sed uae qui dicunt quod bonum malum et tenebras lucem et lucem tenebras et amarum dulce et dulce amarum. quid sibi uelint haec uerba eius, non satis intellego. si enim haec tu scribis, sicut urbicus dicit, in urbe plebs pendens ex pastoris arbitrio cum episcopo suo ieiunat sabbato; si autem ad te ista scripsit, quia in epistula tua et ipse quiddam tale dixisti, non tibi persuadeat urbem Christianam sic laudare sabbato ieiunantem, ut cogaris orbem Christianum damnare prandentem. cum enim dicit: Vae qui dicunt quod bonum malum et tenebras lucem et lucem tenebras et amarum dulce et dulce amarum ieiunium sabbati uolens intellegi bonum et lucem et dulce, prandium uero malum et tenebras et amarum, quis eum dubitet in omnibus Christianis sabbato prandentibus uniuersum orbem damnare terrarum? nec se ipse respicit nec, quibus dicat, adtendit, ut scriptis suis ab ista praecipiti cohibeatur audacia. continuo quippe subiunxit: Nemo ergo uos iudicet in esca aut in potu, quod ipse utique facit, qui sabbato sumentes escam potumque sic arguit. quantum erat, ut hinc ei ueniret in mentem etiam illud, quod idem apostolus alibi dicit: Qui manducat, non manducantem non spernat et, qui non manducat, manducantem non iudicet? isto modo hoc temperamentum, quo scandala deuitaret, inter ieiunantes sabbato et manducantes teneret, ut et ipsum non manducantem manducans quisque non sperneret et ipse non manducans manducantem non iudicaret.

### English translation (Claude)

'It is certain', he says, 'that the life of all depends on the judgment of the pastors; but woe to those who call good evil, and darkness light and light darkness, and bitter sweet and sweet bitter.' What these words of his mean I do not well understand. For if he writes this to you as a man of the city, meaning that in the city the people, depending on the pastor's judgment, fast on the Sabbath with their bishop; or if he wrote it to you because in your letter you yourself said something of the kind: let him not persuade you so to praise the Christian city for fasting on the Sabbath that you are forced to condemn the Christian world for dining. For when he says, 'Woe to those who call good evil, and darkness light and light darkness, and bitter sweet and sweet bitter', wishing the Sabbath fast to be understood as good, light and sweet, and the meal as evil, darkness and bitter, who can doubt that in all Christians who dine on the Sabbath he condemns the whole world? He neither looks at himself nor attends to those to whom he is speaking, so as to be restrained from this headlong audacity by his own writings. For he at once added: 'So let no one judge you in food or in drink', which he himself certainly does when he rebukes in this way those who take food and drink on the Sabbath. How little it would have taken for this to bring to his mind another saying of the same apostle elsewhere: 'Let him who eats not despise him who does not eat, and let him who does not eat not judge him who eats'! In this way he would keep between those who fast on the Sabbath and those who eat the moderation by which scandals are avoided, so that whoever eats would not despise him who does not eat, and he who does not eat would not judge him who eats.

### Scripture references

- Isa 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Isa 5:20, Col 2:16 and Rom 14:3. The sentence about the 'man of the city' is compressed in the Latin and is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.20 (CSEL 34.2:49–50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-20).

## Letter 36.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:50–51
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the claim that Peter taught Saturday fasting at Rome after defeating Simon Magus, citing the story as an uncertain opinion and urging harmony between the customs.

### Latin text

Petrus etiam, inquit, apostolorum caput, caeli ianitor et ecclesiae fundamentum, extincto Simone, qui fuerat diaboli non nisi ieiunio uincendi figura, id ipsum Romanos edocuit, quorum fides adnuntiatur uniuerso orbi terrarum. numquid ergo ceteri apostoli prandere Christianos contra Petrum docuerunt in uniuerso orbe terrarum? sicut itaque inter se uixerunt concorditer Petrus et condiscipuli eius, sic inter se concorditer uiuant sabbato ieiunantes, quos plantauit Petrus, et sabbato prandentes, quos plantauerunt condiscipuli eius. est quidem et haec opinio plurimorum, quamuis eam perhibeant esse falsam plerique Romani, quod apostolus Petrus cum Simone mago die dominico certaturus propter ipsum magnae temptationis periculum pridie cum eiusdem urbis ecclesia ieiunauerit et consecuto tam prospero gloriosoque successu eundem morem tenuerit eamque imitatae sint nonnullae occidentis ecclesiae. sed si, sicut iste dicit, magus Simon figura erat diaboli, non plane sabbatarius aut dominicarius sed cotidianus est ille temptator; nec tamen aduersus eum cotidie ieiunatur, quando et diebus dominicis omnibus et quinquaginta post pascha et per diuersa loca diebus sollemnibus martyrum et festis quibusque prandetur, et tamen diabolus uincitur, si oculi nostri sint semper ad dominum, ut ipse euellat de laqueo pedes nostros, et, siue manducamus siue bibimus siue quodcumque facimus, omnia in gloriam dei faciamus et, quantum in nobis est, sine offensione simus Iudaeis et Graecis et ecclesiae dei. quod parum cogitant, qui cum offensione manducant uel cum offensione ieiunant et per utramlibet intemperantiam scandala concitant, quibus non superatur diabolus, sed laetatur.

### English translation (Claude)

'Peter too', he says, 'the head of the apostles, doorkeeper of heaven and foundation of the church, after the destruction of Simon, who had been a figure of the devil, who can be overcome only by fasting, taught this very thing to the Romans, whose faith is proclaimed in the whole world.' Did the other apostles, then, teach Christians throughout the whole world to dine, against Peter? Just as Peter and his fellow disciples lived in harmony with one another, so let those who fast on the Sabbath, whom Peter planted, and those who dine on the Sabbath, whom his fellow disciples planted, live in harmony with one another. There is indeed this opinion held by very many, although most Romans declare it false, that the apostle Peter, being about to contend with Simon Magus on the Lord's day, fasted the day before with the church of that city because of the very danger of so great a trial, and, having obtained so prosperous and glorious a success, kept the same custom, and some churches of the West have imitated it. But if, as this man says, Simon Magus was a figure of the devil, that tempter is plainly not a Sabbath or Lord's-day tempter but a daily one; and yet we do not fast against him daily, since we dine on all Lord's days and on the fifty days after Easter, and in various places on the solemn days of martyrs and on all feasts; and yet the devil is overcome, if our eyes are always toward the Lord, that he may pluck our feet out of the snare, and if, whether we eat or drink or whatever we do, we do all to the glory of God and, as far as in us lies, give no offence to Jews or Greeks or the church of God. This is little considered by those who eat with offence or fast with offence and by either kind of intemperance stir up scandals, by which the devil is not overcome but rejoices.

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:18–19: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 8:9–24: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 25:15 (24:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:31–32: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Acts Pet. (Acts of Peter): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The contest of Peter with Simon Magus is told in the apocryphal Acts of Peter. Allusions: Matt 16:18–19; Rom 1:8; Acts 8:9–24; quotation of Ps 25:15 (LXX 24:15) and 1 Cor 10:31–32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.21 (CSEL 34.2:50–51; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-21).

## Letter 36.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:51–52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that disputes over which apostolic custom is original are endless, and that the one faith of the church may be clothed in varied observances like the queen's embroidered robe.

### Latin text

Quod si respondetur hoc docuisse Iacobum Hierosolymis, Ephesi Iohannem ceterosque aliis locis, quod docuit Romae Petrus, id est ut sabbato ieiunetur, sed ab hac doctrina terras ceteras deuiasse atque in ea Romam stetisse et e contrario referetur occidentis potius aliqua loca, in quibus Roma est, non seruasse, quod apostoli tradiderunt, orientis uero terras, unde coepit ipsum euangelium praedicari, in eo, quod ab omnibus simul cum ipso Petro apostolis traditum est, ne sabbato ieiunaretur, sine aliqua uarietate mansisse, interminabilis est ista contentio generans lites, non finiens quaestiones. sit ergo una fides uniuersae, quae ubique dilatatur, ecclesiae tamquam intus in membris, etiam si ipsa fidei unitas quibusdam diuersis obseruationibus celebratur, quibus nullo modo, quod in fide uerum est, impeditur. omnis enim pulchritudo filiae regis intrinsecus. illae autem obseruationes, quae uariae celebrantur, in eius ueste intelleguntur, unde ibi dicitur: In fimbriis aureis circumamicta uarietate. sed ea quoque uestis ita diuersis celebrationibus uarietur, ut non aduersis contentionibus dissipetur.

### English translation (Claude)

And if it is answered that James taught at Jerusalem, John at Ephesus and the others in other places what Peter taught at Rome, namely to fast on the Sabbath, but that the other lands strayed from this teaching and Rome stood firm in it; and if on the contrary it is retorted that rather some places in the West, among them Rome, did not keep what the apostles handed down, while the lands of the East, where the gospel itself began to be preached, remained without any variation in what was handed down by all the apostles together with Peter himself, namely not to fast on the Sabbath, then this contention is endless, begetting quarrels, not ending questions. Let there be, then, one faith of the whole church spread everywhere, as it were within in the members, even if that very unity of faith is celebrated with certain different observances, by which what is true in the faith is in no way hindered. For all the beauty of the king's daughter is within. Those observances which are celebrated variously are understood as being in her garment, whence it is said there: 'Clothed with golden fringes in variety.' But let that garment too be varied by different celebrations in such a way that it is not torn apart by opposing contentions.

### Scripture references

- Ps 45:13–14 (44:14-Ps LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Ps 45:13–14 (LXX 44:14–15).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.22 (CSEL 34.2:51–52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-22).

## Letter 36.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:52–53
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the claim that eating on Saturday is serving two masters, since Christ is Lord of both the Sabbath and the Lord's day.

### Latin text

Postremo, inquit, si Iudaeus sabbatum colendo dominicum negat, quo modo sabbatum Christianus obseruat?, aut sumus Christiani et dominicum colimus aut sumus Iudaei et sabbatum obseruamus; nemo enim potest duobus dominis seruire. nonne ita loquitur, tamquam sabbati alius dominus sit, alius dominici? nec illud audit, quod et ipse commemorauit: Dominus est enim sabbati filius hominis. quod autem ita nos uult esse a sabbato alienos, sicut Iudaei sunt a dominico alieni, nonne tantum errat, ut possit etiam dicere ita nos non debere accipere legem nec prophetas, sicut Iudaei non accipiunt euangelium nec apostolos? quod qui sapit, quid mali sapiat, utique intellegis. sed uetera, inquit, omnia transierunt et in Christo facta sunt noua. hoc uerum est; nam propterea sicut Iudaei sabbatis non uacamus, etiam si ad significandam requiem, quae illo die significata est, Christiana sobrietate et frugalitate seruata ieiunii uinculum relaxamus, et, si aliqui fratres nostri requiem sabbati relaxatione ieiunii significandam esse non putant, nequaquam de uestis regiae uarietate litigamus, ne ipsius reginae, ubi unam fidem etiam de ipsa requie retinemus, interiora membra uexemus. etsi enim, quia uetera transierunt, cum eis transiit etiam carnalis uacatio sabbati, non tamen, quia sabbato et dominico sine superstitiosa uacatione prandemus, ideo duobus dominis seruimus, quia et sabbati et dominici unus est dominus.

### English translation (Claude)

'Finally', he says, 'if the Jew denies the Lord's day by keeping the Sabbath, how does the Christian observe the Sabbath? Either we are Christians and keep the Lord's day, or we are Jews and observe the Sabbath; for no one can serve two masters.' Does he not speak as though the Sabbath had one lord and the Lord's day another? Nor does he hear what he himself mentioned: 'For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.' And in wishing us to be as alien from the Sabbath as the Jews are from the Lord's day, does he not err so far that he could even say that we ought not to accept the law and the prophets, as the Jews do not accept the gospel and the apostles? You certainly understand what evil a man savours who savours this. 'But', he says, 'all old things have passed away, and in Christ they have been made new.' This is true; and that is why we do not rest on Sabbaths as the Jews do, even if, to signify the rest which was signified by that day, we relax the bond of fasting while keeping Christian sobriety and frugality; and if some of our brothers do not think the Sabbath rest should be signified by relaxing the fast, we in no way quarrel about the variety of the royal garment, lest we trouble the inner members of the queen herself, where we hold one faith even about that rest. For although, because old things have passed away, the carnal Sabbath rest has passed away with them, yet we do not serve two masters because we dine on the Sabbath and the Lord's day without superstitious rest, since there is one Lord of both the Sabbath and the Lord's day.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:24: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Matt 6:24, Matt 12:8 and 2 Cor 5:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.23 (CSEL 34.2:52–53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-23).

## Letter 36.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:53–54
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine corrects the tract's contrast between old and new worship, arguing that each old sign gave way to its spiritual counterpart, and so the carnal Sabbath to the spiritual.

### Latin text

Iste autem, qui uetera transisse sic dicit, ut in Christo cederet ara altari, gladius ieiunio, precibus ignis, pani pecus, poculo sanguis, nescit altaris nomen magis legis et prophetarum litteris frequentatum et altare deo prius in tabernaculo, quod per Moysen factum est, conlocatum, aram quoque in apostolicis litteris inueniri, ubi martyres clamant sub ara dei. dicit cessisse ieiunio gladium non recordans illum, quo milites euangelici armantur ex utroque testamento, gladium bis acutum. dicit cessisse precibus ignem, quasi non et tunc preces deferebantur in templum et nunc a Christo ignis est missus in mundum. dicit cessisse pani pecus tamquam nesciens et tunc in domini mensa panes propositionis poni solere et nunc se de agni inmaculati corpore partem sumere. dicit cessisse poculo sanguinem non cogitans etiam nunc se accipere in poculo sanguinem. quanto ergo melius et congruentius uetera transisse et noua in Christo facta esse sic diceret, ut cederet altare altari, gladius gladio, ignis igni, panis pani, pecus pecori, sanguis sanguini. uidemus quippe in his omnibus carnalem uetustatem spiritali cedere nouitati. sic ergo intellegendum est, siue in isto die uolubili septimo prandeatur siue a quibusdam etiam ieiunetur, tamen sabbato spiritali sabbatum carnale cessisse; quando in isto sempiterna et uera requies concupiscitur, in illo uacatio temporalis iam superstitiosa contemnitur.

### English translation (Claude)

But this man, who says that the old things have passed away in such a way that 'in Christ the ara yielded to the altare, the sword to fasting, fire to prayers, the beast to bread, blood to the cup', does not know that the word altare occurs more often in the writings of the law and the prophets, and that an altare was set up for God first in the tabernacle made through Moses, and that the word ara too is found in the apostolic writings, where the martyrs cry out under the ara of God. He says the sword yielded to fasting, not remembering the sword with which the soldiers of the gospel are armed from both testaments, the two-edged sword. He says fire yielded to prayers, as if prayers were not brought into the temple then too, and as if fire has not now been sent by Christ into the world. He says the beast yielded to bread, as if he did not know that then too the loaves of the presence used to be placed on the Lord's table, and that now he himself receives a part of the body of the spotless Lamb. He says blood yielded to the cup, not reflecting that even now he receives blood in the cup. How much better and more fittingly, then, would he say that the old things have passed away and new things have been made in Christ in such a way that altar yielded to altar, sword to sword, fire to fire, bread to bread, beast to beast, blood to blood! For in all these we see the carnal oldness yielding to spiritual newness. So it must be understood that, whether on this seventh day of the turning week one dines, or some even fast, the carnal Sabbath has nevertheless yielded to the spiritual Sabbath; since in the latter the true and everlasting rest is desired, while in the former the temporal resting, now superstitious, is despised.

### Scripture references

- Exod 27:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 6:9: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 4:12: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 12:49: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 25:30: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 1:19: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 5:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The tract contrasts ara (an altar, often pagan) with altare (the altar of God); Augustine shows both words are used of God's altar. Allusions: Exod 27:1; Rev 6:9; Heb 4:12; Luke 12:49; Exod 25:30; 1 Pet 1:19; Matt 26:27–28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.24 (CSEL 34.2:53–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-24).

## Letter 36.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:54–55
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine gives his own view: fasting is commanded in the New Testament, but no days are fixed, and relaxing the fast on Saturday better signifies eternal rest.

### Latin text

Cetera, quae sequuntur, quibus suam disputationem iste concludit, sicut alia quaedam, quae inde commemoranda non arbitratus sum, multo magis ad causam non pertinent, in qua de sabbati ieiunio uel prandio disputatur. sed ea tibi ipsi, maxime si ex his, quae a me dicta sunt, aliquid adiuuaris, aduertenda et iudicanda dimitto. si autem, quoniam huic, quantum potui, sufficienter respondisse me puto, de hac re sententiam meam quaeris, ego in euangelicis et apostolicis litteris totoque instrumento, quod appellatur testamentum nouum, animo id reuoluens uideo praeceptum esse ieiunium. quibus autem diebus non oporteat ieiunare et quibus oporteat, praecepto domini uel apostolorum non inuenio definitum. ac per hoc sentio quidem non ad obtinendam, quam fides obtinet atque iustitia, in qua est pulchritudo filiae regis intrinsecus, sed tamen ad significandam requiem sempiternam, ubi est uerum sabbatum, relaxationem quam constrictionem ieiunii aptius conuenire.

### English translation (Claude)

The rest that follows, with which he concludes his disputation, like some other things in it which I did not think worth mentioning, is still less relevant to the case, in which the dispute is about fasting or dining on the Sabbath. But I leave it to you to notice and judge, especially if you are helped by anything I have said. If, however, since I think I have answered him sufficiently, as far as I could, you ask my own opinion on this matter: turning it over in my mind, I see that fasting is commanded in the gospel and apostolic writings and in the whole instrument called the New Testament. But on which days one ought not to fast and on which one ought, I do not find defined by any command of the Lord or of the apostles. And for this reason I do think that relaxing the fast is more fitting than tightening it, not indeed for obtaining the righteousness which faith obtains, in which is the beauty of the king's daughter within, but for signifying the everlasting rest, where the true Sabbath is.

### Scripture references

- Ps 45:13 (44:14 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ps 45:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.25 (CSEL 34.2:54–55; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-25).

## Letter 36.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:55–56
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine counsels that those who fast and those who eat on Saturday should not despise or judge one another, avoiding offence either way.

### Latin text

Verum tamen in huius sabbati ieiunio siue prandio nihil mihi uidetur tutius pacatiusque seruari, quam ut, qui manducat, non manducantem non spernat et, qui non manducat, manducantem non iudicet, quia neque, si manducauerimus, abundabimus neque, si non manducauerimus, egebimus custodita scilicet eorum, inter quos uiuimus et cum quibus deo uiuimus, in his rebus inoffensa societate. sicut enim, quod ait apostolus, uerum est malum esse homini, qui per offensionem manducat, ita malum est homini, qui per offensionem ieiunat. non itaque simus eis similes, qui uidentes Iohannem non manducantem nec bibentem dixerunt: Daemonium habet, sed nec rursus eis, qui uidentes Christum manducantem et bibentem dixerunt: Ecce homo uorax et uinosus, amicus publicanorum et peccatorum. rem quippe ualde necessariam his dictis dominus ipse subiecit atque ait: Et iustificata est sapientia in filiis suis. qui sint autem isti, si requiris, lege, quod scriptum est: Filii sapientiae ecclesia iustorum. hi sunt, qui, quando manducant, non manducantes non spernunt, quando non manducant, manducantes non iudicant, sed eos plane, qui per offensionem non manducant siue manducant, uel spernunt uel iudicant.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet in this matter of fasting or dining on the Sabbath nothing seems to me safer and more peaceful to observe than that he who eats should not despise him who does not eat, and he who does not eat should not judge him who eats, because if we eat we shall not abound, and if we do not eat we shall not lack; keeping, of course, the fellowship of those among whom we live, and with whom we live for God, unoffended in these matters. For just as what the apostle says is true, that it is evil for a man who eats with offence, so it is evil for a man who fasts with offence. Let us not, then, be like those who, seeing John neither eating nor drinking, said, 'He has a demon'; nor again like those who, seeing Christ eating and drinking, said, 'Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.' To these words the Lord himself added something very necessary, saying: 'And wisdom is justified by her children.' If you ask who these are, read what is written: 'The children of wisdom are the church of the righteous.' These are they who, when they eat, do not despise those who do not eat, and when they do not eat, do not judge those who eat; but they plainly despise or judge those who either do not eat or eat so as to give offence.

### Scripture references

- Rom 14:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:20: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:18–19: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 3:1 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Rom 14:3; 1 Cor 8:8; Rom 14:20; Matt 11:18–19. 'The children of wisdom are the church of the righteous' is Sir 3:1 in the Latin form.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.26 (CSEL 34.2:55–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-26).

## Letter 36.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:56–57
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says fasting on Sunday is a scandal, especially because the Manichaeans made it their fast day, except within a long continuous fast.

### Latin text

Et de die quidem sabbati facilior causa est, quia et Romana ieiunat ecclesia et aliae nonnullae etiam si paucae siue illi proximae siue longinquae. die autem dominico ieiunare scandalum est magnum, maxime postea quam innotuit detestabilis multumque fidei catholicae scripturisque diuinis apertissime contraria haeresis Manichaeorum, qui suis auditoribus ad ieiunandum istum tamquam legitimum constituerunt diem. per quod factum est, ut ieiunium diei dominici horribilius haberetur, nisi forte aliquis idoneus sit nulla refectione interposita ultra hebdomadem perpetuare ieiunium, ut ieiunio quadraginta dierum, quantum potuerit, adpropinquet, sicut aliquos fecisse cognouimus. nam et ad ipsum quadragenarium numerum peruenisse quendam a fratribus fide dignissimis nobis adseueratum est. quem ad modum enim ueterum patrum temporibus Moyses et Helias nihil contra prandia sabbatorum fecerunt, cum diebus quadragenis ieiunauerunt, ita, qui potuerit septem dies ieiunando transire, non sibi ad ieiunandum elegit dominicum diem, sed in his eum inuenit, quos ieiunaturum se uouit plurimos dies. ieiunium tamen etiam continuatum si in hebdomade soluendum est, nullo congruentius quam dominico die soluitur. si autem post hebdomadem corpus reficitur, non utique ad ieiunandum dies dominicus eligitur, sed in numero, quem uoueri placuit, inuenitur.

### English translation (Claude)

About the Sabbath day the case is easier, because the Roman church fasts, and some others too, though few, whether near it or far off. But to fast on the Lord's day is a great scandal, especially since the heresy of the Manichaeans became known, detestable and most openly contrary to the Catholic faith and the divine Scriptures, which appointed this day as the lawful fast day for their hearers. Through this it has come about that fasting on the Lord's day is held in greater horror; unless perhaps someone is able to prolong a fast beyond a week without any refreshment in between, so as to approach the forty days' fast as nearly as he can, as we know some have done. For it was asserted to us by most trustworthy brothers that one man even reached the very number of forty. For just as in the times of the ancient fathers Moses and Elijah did nothing against Sabbath meals when they fasted forty days, so one who can pass seven days fasting has not chosen the Lord's day for fasting, but found it among the many days he vowed to fast. Yet if a fast, even a continuous one, is to be broken within the week, it is broken on no day more fittingly than on the Lord's day. But if the body is refreshed after a week, the Lord's day is certainly not chosen for fasting but is found within the number which one decided to vow.

### Translation notes

- The Manichaean 'hearers' were their lay adherents.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.27 (CSEL 34.2:56–57; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-27).

## Letter 36.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:57–58
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul's all-night discourse at Troas on the first day of the week was a special necessity, not evidence that the apostles fasted on Sundays, as the Priscillianists claim.

### Latin text

Nec illud moneat, quod Priscillianistae Manichaeorum simillimi ad ieiunandum die dominico solent testimonium de apostolorum actibus adhibere, cum esset Paulus apostolus in Troade. sic enim scriptum est: In una autem sabbati congregatis nobis frangere panem Paulus disputabat illis exiturus alia die produxitque sermonem usque ad medium noctis. deinde cum descendisset de cenaculo, ubi congregati erant, ad resuscitandum adulescentem, qui grauatus somno de fenestra ceciderat et mortuus ferebatur, de ipso apostolo scriptura sic loquitur: Ascendens autem, inquit, cum fregisset panem atque gustasset satisque esset adlocutus usque ad diluculum, sic profectus est. absit, ut hoc sic accipiatur, tamquam solerent apostoli dominico die sollemniter ieiunare. una enim sabbati tunc appellabatur dies, qui nunc dominicus appellatur, quod in euangeliis apertius inuenitur. nam dies resurrectionis domini prima sabbati a Matthaeo, a ceteris autem tribus una sabbati dicitur, quem constat eum esse, qui postea dominicus appellatus est. aut ergo post peractum diem sabbati noctis initio fuerant congregati, quae utique nox iam ad diem dominicum, hoc est ad unam sabbati pertinebat, et ita eadem nocte fracturus panem, sicut frangitur in sacramento corporis Christi, produxit sermonem usque ad medium noctis, ut post celebrata sacramenta rursus usque ad diluculum adloquens congregatos, quoniam multum festinabat, lucescente proficisceretur dominico die, aut certe, si in una sabbati non per noctem sed per diem hora dominici fuerant congregati, eo ipso, quod dictum est: Paulus disputabat illis exiturus alia die, expressa est producendi causa sermonis, quia fuerat exiturus et eos sufficienter instruere cupiebat. non ergo sollemniter die dominico ieiunabant, sed necessarius sermo, qui studii feruentissimi audiebatur ardore, reficiendi corporis causa interrumpendus esse non uisus est profecturo apostolo, qui eos propter alios suos usquequaque discursus uel alias numquam uel rarissime uisitabat, praesertim quia tunc ex illis terris, sicut consequentia docent, ita discessurus erat, ut iam non esset eos in carne uisurus. ac per hoc magis ostenditur dominicis diebus solita illis non fuisse ieiunia, quia, ne hoc crederetur, curauit scriptor libri causam producendi sermonis exponere, ut sciremus, si aliqua necessitas oriatur, urguentiori actioni non esse prandium praeferendum. quamuis ab istis auidissime audientibus et ipsum fontem cogitantibus profecturum atque ideo magna siti non aquae sed uerbi sine satietate, quicquid influebat, haurientibus non tantum carnale prandium uerum etiam cena contempta est.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should anyone be moved by the fact that the Priscillianists, who are very like the Manichaeans, usually bring forward a testimony from the Acts of the Apostles for fasting on the Lord's day, when the apostle Paul was at Troas. For thus it is written: 'On the first day of the week, when we were gathered to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart the next day, and prolonged his speech until midnight.' Then, when he had gone down from the upper room where they were gathered to raise the young man who, overcome by sleep, had fallen from the window and was being carried out dead, Scripture speaks thus of the apostle himself: 'When he had gone up again and had broken bread and eaten, and had talked a long while, until daybreak, so he departed.' Far be it that this be taken to mean that the apostles were accustomed to fast solemnly on the Lord's day. For the day now called the Lord's day was then called the first of the week, as is found more plainly in the gospels. For the day of the Lord's resurrection is called by Matthew the first of the week and by the other three one of the week, and it is agreed that it is the day which was afterwards called the Lord's day. Either, then, they had gathered at the beginning of the night after the Sabbath day had ended, a night which certainly already belonged to the Lord's day, that is, to the first of the week; and so on that same night, intending to break bread as it is broken in the sacrament of the body of Christ, he prolonged his speech until midnight, so that after the sacraments had been celebrated he might talk again with the gathering until daybreak and, being in great haste, depart as the Lord's day dawned. Or certainly, if they had gathered on the first of the week not by night but by day, at an hour of the Lord's day, the reason for prolonging the speech is expressed in the very words, 'Paul talked with them, intending to depart the next day': he was about to depart and wished to instruct them sufficiently. They were not, then, solemnly fasting on the Lord's day; but it did not seem right to the apostle, who was about to set out, to interrupt for the refreshment of the body a necessary discourse which was being heard with the ardour of the most fervent zeal, since because of his other journeys in every direction he either never or very rarely visited them again, especially as he was then about to leave those lands in such a way, as what follows shows, that he would not see them again in the flesh. And by this it is rather shown that fasts on the Lord's days were not customary for them, because, lest this be believed, the writer of the book took care to set out the reason for prolonging the speech, so that we might know that, if some necessity arises, a meal should not be preferred to more urgent business. And yet by those who were listening most eagerly and thinking that the very fountain was about to depart, and who therefore drank in whatever flowed, with a great thirst, not for water but for the word, without being satisfied, not only the bodily midday meal but even supper was disregarded.

### Scripture references

- Acts 20:7: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 20:9–10: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 20:11: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 28:1: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 16:2: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 20:25: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Acts 20:7, 11; allusions: Matt 28:1; Mark 16:2; Acts 20:25, 38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.28 (CSEL 34.2:57–58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-28).

## Letter 36.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:58–59
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that, since heretics made Sunday a fast day, even Paul's example should not now be followed, and the Lord's day should not be a fast day except within a vowed continuous fast.

### Latin text

Sed tunc quamuis dominico die solita illis ieiunia non fuissent, non erat tamen ecclesiae tam insignis offensio, si aliqua tali necessitate, qualem Paulus apostolus habuit, die toto dominico usque ad medium noctis uel etiam usque ad diluculum reficere corpora non curarent. nunc uero postea quam haeretici maxime impiissimi ieiunia diei dominici non aliqua necessitate occurrentia peragere, sed quasi sacra sollemnitate statuta dogmatizare coeperunt et innotuerunt populis Christianis, profecto nec tali necessitate, qualem apostolus habuit, existimo faciendum esse, quod fecit, ne maius malum incurratur in scandalo, quam bonum percipiatur ex uerbo. quicquid tamen causae uel necessitatis extiterit, cur homo Christianus die dominico ieiunare cogatur, sicut etiam illud in actibus apostolorum inuenimus in naufragii periculo, ubi et ipse apostolus nauigabat, quattuordecim diebus ac per hoc duobus dominicis ieiunatum, nullo modo dubitare debemus dominicum diem, quando non plures dies sine ulla refectione continuandi uouentur, inter ieiuniorum dies non esse ponendum.

### English translation (Claude)

But although fasts were not customary for them then on the Lord's day, it was nevertheless no such notable offence to the church if, under some such necessity as the apostle Paul had, they did not trouble to refresh their bodies the whole Lord's day until midnight or even until daybreak. But now, since heretics, and especially the most impious, have begun to practise fasts on the Lord's day, not because of some necessity that has arisen, but to teach them as established by a sacred solemnity, and have become known to the Christian peoples, I certainly think that not even under such a necessity as the apostle had should what he did be done, lest a greater evil be incurred by the scandal than the good gained from the word. Yet whatever cause or necessity may arise for a Christian to be compelled to fast on the Lord's day (as we also find in the Acts of the Apostles, in the danger of shipwreck, when the apostle himself was on board, that there was fasting for fourteen days and therefore on two Lord's days), we ought in no way to doubt that the Lord's day, when several days are not vowed to be continued without any refreshment, should not be counted among fast days.

### Scripture references

- Acts 27:33: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Acts 27:33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.29 (CSEL 34.2:58–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-29).

## Letter 36.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:59–60
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Wednesday and Friday are fast days because the plot against Christ was made on the fourth day and he suffered on the sixth.

### Latin text

Cur autem quarta et sexta maxime ieiunet ecclesia, illa ratio reddi uidetur, quod considerato euangelio ipsa quarta sabbati, quam uulgo quartam feriam uocant, consilium reperiuntur ad occidendum dominum fecisse Iudaei. intermisso autem uno die, cuius uespera dominus pascha cum discipulis manducauit, qui finis fuit eius diei, quem uocamus quintam sabbati, deinde traditus est ea nocte, quae iam ad sextam sabbati, qui dies passionis eius manifestus est, pertinebat. hic dies primus azymorum fuit a uespera incipiens. sed Matthaeus euangelista quintam sabbati dicit fuisse primum azymorum, quia eius uespera consequente futura erat cena paschalis, qua cena incipiebat azymum et ouis immolatio manducari. ex quo colligitur quartam sabbati fuisse, quando ait dominus: Scitis, quia post biduum pascha fiet et filius hominis tradetur, ut crucifigatur. ac per hoc dies ipse ieiunio deputatus est, quia, sicut euangelista sequitur et dicit, tunc congregati sunt principes sacerdotum et seniores populi in atrium principis sacerdotum, qui dicebatur Caiphas, et consilium fecerunt, ut Iesum dolo tenerent et occiderent. intermisso autem uno die, de quo dicit euangelium: Prima autem azymorum accesserunt discipuli ad Iesum dicentes: Ubi uis paremus tibi comedere pascha? — hoc ergo die intermisso passus est dominus, quod nullus ambigit, sexta sabbati. quapropter et ipsa sexta recte ieiunio deputatur; ieiunia quippe humilitatem significant. unde dictum est: Et humiliabam in ieiunio animam meam.

### English translation (Claude)

As to why the church fasts especially on the fourth and sixth day, the reason given seems to be this: when the gospel is considered, it is on the fourth day of the week, which is commonly called the fourth feria, that the Jews are found to have taken counsel to kill the Lord. Then one day intervened, at the evening of which the Lord ate the Passover with his disciples; that was the end of the day which we call the fifth of the week. Then he was betrayed on that night which already belonged to the sixth of the week, which is plainly the day of his passion. This day was the first of unleavened bread, beginning from the evening. But the evangelist Matthew says that the fifth of the week was the first of unleavened bread, because at its following evening the paschal supper was to take place, at which supper the eating of unleavened bread and the sacrifice of the lamb began. From this it is gathered that it was the fourth of the week when the Lord said, 'You know that after two days the Passover will come, and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.' And for this reason that day itself was assigned to fasting, because, as the evangelist goes on to say, then the chief priests and the elders of the people gathered in the court of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and took counsel to seize Jesus by stealth and kill him. Then one day intervened, of which the gospel says, 'On the first day of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Where do you wish us to prepare for you to eat the Passover?' After this intervening day the Lord suffered, as no one doubts, on the sixth of the week. Therefore the sixth day too is rightly assigned to fasting; for fasts signify humility. Hence it is said: 'And I humbled my soul with fasting.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:2–4: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:17: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 35:13 (34:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The account of the plot against Jesus is the gospel narrative, retold as written. Quotations of Matt 26:2–4, 17 and Ps 35:13 (LXX 34:13).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.30 (CSEL 34.2:59–60; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-30).

## Letter 36.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:60–61
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Saturday, the day Christ rested in the tomb, is kept by some with fasting and by others with relaxation, but all fast on Holy Saturday.

### Latin text

Sequitur sabbatum, quo die caro Christi in monumento requieuit, sicut in primis operibus mundi requieuit deus illo die ab omnibus operibus suis. hinc exorta est ista in regia illa ueste uarietas, ut alii sicut maxime populi orientis propter requiem significandam mallent relaxare ieiunium, alii propter humilitatem mortis domini ieiunare sicut Romana et nonnullae occidentis ecclesiae, quod quidem uno die, quo pascha celebratur, propter renouandam rei gestae memoriam, qua discipuli humanitus mortem domini doluerunt, sic ab omnibus ieiunatur, ut etiam illi sabbati ieiunium deuotissime celebrent, qui ceteris per totum annum sabbatis prandent, utrumque uidelicet significantes et in uno anniuersario die luctum discipulorum et ceteris sabbatis quietis bonum. duo quippe sunt, quae iustorum beatitudinem et omnis miseriae finem sperari faciunt, mors et resurrectio mortuorum. in morte requies est, de qua dicitur per prophetam: Plebs mea intra in cellaria tua, abscondere pusillum, donec transeat ira domini, in resurrectione autem in homine toto, id est in carne et spiritu perfecta felicitas. hinc factum est, ut horum duorum utrumque non significandum putaretur labore ieiunii sed potius refectionis hilaritate excepto paschali uno sabbato, quo discipulorum, sicut diximus, luctus propter rei gestae memoriam fuerat ieiunio prolixiore signandus.

### English translation (Claude)

There follows the Sabbath, on which day the flesh of Christ rested in the tomb, just as in the first works of the world God rested on that day from all his works. From this arose that variety in the royal garment: some, especially the peoples of the East, preferred to relax the fast in order to signify rest, while others, like the Roman church and some churches of the West, fast because of the humility of the Lord's death. On the one Sabbath on which Easter is celebrated, however, to renew the memory of what happened, when the disciples grieved humanly over the Lord's death, all fast, so that even those who dine on the other Sabbaths throughout the year keep the fast of that Sabbath most devoutly; thus signifying both things, the mourning of the disciples on the one annual day, and on the other Sabbaths the good of rest. For there are two things that make us hope for the happiness of the righteous and the end of all misery: death and the resurrection of the dead. In death there is rest, of which it is said through the prophet: 'My people, enter your chambers, hide yourself for a little while, until the wrath of the Lord passes'; but in the resurrection there is perfect happiness in the whole man, that is, in flesh and spirit. Hence it came about that neither of these two was thought fit to be signified by the labour of fasting, but rather by the cheerfulness of refreshment; except the one paschal Sabbath, on which the mourning of the disciples, as we said, was to be marked by a longer fast, in memory of what happened.

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 26:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Gen 2:2; quotation of Isa 26:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.31 (CSEL 34.2:60–61; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-31).

## Letter 36.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:61–63
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls Ambrose's advice to follow the custom of the church where one is, and tells Casulanus to follow his own bishop's practice on Saturday fasting.

### Latin text

Sed quoniam non inuenimus, ut iam supra commemoraui, in euangelicis et apostolicis litteris, quae ad noui testamenti reuelationem proprie pertinent, certis diebus aliquibus euidenter praeceptum obseruanda esse ieiunia et ideo res quoque ista sicut aliae plurimae, quas enumerare difficile est, inuenit in ueste illius filiae regis, hoc est ecclesiae uarietatis locum, indicabo tibi, quid mihi de hoc requirenti responderit uenerandus Ambrosius, a quo baptizatus sum, Mediolanensis episcopus. nam cum in eadem ciuitate mater mea mecum esset et nobis adhuc catechumenis parum ista curantibus illa sollicitudinem gereret, utrum secundum morem nostrae ciuitatis sibi esset sabbato ieiunandum, an ecclesiae Mediolanensis more prandendum, ut hac eam cunctatione liberarem, interrogaui hoc supra dictum hominem dei. at ille: Quid possum, inquit, hinc docere amplius, quam ipse facio? ubi ego putaueram nihil eum ista responsione praecepisse, nisi ut sabbato pranderemus; hoc quippe ipsum facere sciebam. sed ille secutus adiecit: Quando hic sum, non ieiuno sabbato; quando Romae sum, ieiuno sabbato. et ad quamcumque ecclesiam ueneritis, inquit, eius morem seruate, si pati scandalum non uultis aut facere. hoc responsum rettuli ad matrem eique suffecit nec dubitauit esse oboediendum; hoc etiam nos secuti sumus. sed quoniam contigit maxime in Africa, ut una ecclesia uel unius regionis ecclesiae alios habeant sabbato prandentes alios ieiunantes, mos eorum mihi sequendus uidetur, quibus eorundem populorum congregatio regenda commissa est. quapropter si consilio meo, praesertim quia in hac causa plus forte, quam satis fuit, te petente atque urguente locutus sum, libenter adquiescis, episcopo tuo in hac re noli resistere et, quod facit ipse, sine ullo scrupulo uel disceptatione sectare.

### English translation (Claude)

But since, as I mentioned above, we do not find in the gospel and apostolic writings, which properly belong to the revelation of the New Testament, any clear command that fasts are to be observed on certain fixed days, and therefore this matter too, like very many others which are hard to enumerate, has found a place of variety in the garment of that king's daughter, that is, the church, I will tell you what the venerable Ambrose, bishop of Milan, by whom I was baptized, answered me when I asked about this. When my mother was with me in that city, and we, still catechumens, cared little about these things, she was anxious whether she ought to fast on the Sabbath according to the custom of our city or dine according to the custom of the church of Milan; to free her from this hesitation, I asked the man of God mentioned above. And he said: 'What more can I teach on this than what I do myself?' I had thought that by this answer he had prescribed nothing except that we should dine on the Sabbath; for I knew that he did this himself. But he went on to add: 'When I am here, I do not fast on the Sabbath; when I am at Rome, I fast on the Sabbath. And to whatever church you come,' he said, 'keep its custom, if you do not wish to suffer scandal or to cause it.' I reported this answer to my mother, and it satisfied her, and she did not doubt that it should be obeyed; we too have followed it. But since it happens, especially in Africa, that one church, or the churches of one region, have some members who dine on the Sabbath and others who fast, the custom to follow seems to me to be that of those to whom the government of these peoples' congregations has been entrusted. Therefore, if you willingly accept my counsel, especially since in this cause I have spoken perhaps more than was sufficient, at your request and urging, do not resist your bishop in this matter, and follow what he himself does without any scruple or dispute.

### Scripture references

- Ps 45:13–14 (44:14-Ps LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's mother is Monica. Allusion to Ps 45:13–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 36.32 (CSEL 34.2:61–63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-36-32).

## Letter 37.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:63
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Simplicianus of Milan for his fatherly letter of congratulation.

### Latin text

Plenas bonorum gaudiorum litteras, quod sis memor mei meque, ut soles, diligas magnaeque gratulationi tibi sit, quicquid in me donorum suorum dominus conferre dignatus est misericordia sua, non meritis meis, missas munere tuae sanctitatis accepi. in quibus affectum in me paternum, tuo benignissimo corde non repentinum et nouum hausi, sed expertum plane cognitumque repetiui, domine beatissime et uenerabiliter sincerissima caritate amplectende.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received, sent through the kindness of Your Holiness, a letter full of good joys: that you remember me and love me as you always have, and that whatever gifts the Lord has deigned to confer on me in his mercy, not for my merits, is a matter of great rejoicing for you. In it I drank in your fatherly affection toward me, which I did not find sudden and new in your most kind heart, but recognized again as fully tried and known, most blessed lord, to be embraced with reverence and most sincere love.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Simplicianus, Ambrose's successor as bishop of Milan.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 37.1 (CSEL 34.2:63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-1).

## Letter 37.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:63–64
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Simplicianus's approval of his books is God's confirmation of his work.

### Latin text

Unde autem tanta exorta est felicitas litterario labori nostro, quo in librorum quorundam conscriptione sudauimus, ut a tua dignatione legerentur, nisi quia dominus, cui subdita est anima mea, consolari uoluit curas meas et a timore recreare, quo me in talibus operibus necesse est esse sollicitum, necubi forte indoctior uel incautior quamuis in planissimo campo ueritatis offendam? cum enim tibi placet, quod scribo, noui, cui placeat, quoniam, quis te inhabitet, noui. idem quippe omnium munerum spiritalium distributor atque largitor per tuam sententiam confirmauit oboedientiam meam. quicquid enim habent illa scripta delectatione tua dignum, in meo ministerio dixit deus: Fiat, et factum est; in tua uero approbatione uidit deus, quia bonum est.

### English translation (Claude)

From where has such good fortune come to the literary labour we have sweated over in writing certain books, that they should be read by Your Worthiness, except that the Lord, to whom my soul is subject, wished to console my cares and to refresh me from the fear with which I must be anxious in such works, lest perhaps through lack of learning or caution I stumble somewhere, even on the most level plain of truth? For when what I write pleases you, I know whom it pleases, since I know who dwells in you. For the same distributor and bestower of all spiritual gifts has confirmed my obedience through your judgment. For whatever those writings contain that is worthy of your delight, God said in my ministry, 'Let it be', and it was made; but in your approval God saw that it was good.

### Scripture references

- Gen 1:3–4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Gen 1:3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 37.2 (CSEL 34.2:63–64; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-2).

## Letter 37.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:64
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine promises to answer Simplicianus's questions and asks him to pray for him and correct his writings.

### Latin text

Quaestiunculas sane, quas mihi enodandas iubere dignatus es, etsi mea tarditate implicatus non intellegerem, tuis meritis adiutus aperirem. tantum illud quaeso, ut pro infirmitate mea depreceris deum et siue in his, quibus me exercere benigne paterneque uoluisti, siue in aliis, quaecumque nostra in tuas sanctas manus forte peruenerint, quia sicut dei data sic etiam mea errata cogito, non solum curam legentis inpendas, sed etiam censuram corrigentis adsumas.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the little questions you have deigned to bid me unravel, even if, entangled in my slowness, I did not understand them, I would open them up, helped by your merits. Only this I ask: that you pray to God for my weakness, and that, whether in these questions in which you kindly and in a fatherly way wished me to exercise myself, or in any others of ours that may perhaps come into your holy hands (for just as I consider what is God's gift, so too I consider my own errors), you not only bestow the care of a reader but also take up the censure of a corrector.

### Translation notes

- The questions are answered in Augustine's To Simplicianus, on Various Questions.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 37.3 (CSEL 34.2:64; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-37-3).

## Letter 38.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:64–65
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, confined to bed by a painful ailment, tells Profuturus he is nevertheless well in spirit and asks his prayers.

### Latin text

Secundum spiritum, quantum domino placet atque ipse uires praebere dignatur, recte sumus; corpore autem ego in lecto sum; nec ambulare enim nec stare nec sedere possum rhagadis uel exochadis dolore et tumore. sed etiam sic, quoniam id domino placet, quid aliud dicendum est, nisi quia recte sumus? potius enim, si id nolumus, quod ille uult, nos culpandi sumus, quam ille non recte aliquid uel facere uel sinere existimandus est. nosti haec omnia; sed quia mihi ea alter ego, quid libentius tecum loquerer, nisi quod mecum loquor? commendamus ergo sanctis orationibus tuis et dies et noctes nostras, ut oretis pro nobis, ne diebus intemperanter utamur, ut noctes aequo animo toleremus, ut, etiam si ambulemus in medio umbrae-mortis, nobiscum sit dominus, ne timeamus mala.

### English translation (Claude)

In the spirit, as far as it pleases the Lord and he deigns to supply strength, we are well; but in body I am in bed, for I can neither walk nor stand nor sit, because of the pain and swelling of fissures or external piles. But even so, since this pleases the Lord, what else is to be said but that we are well? For if we do not will what he wills, it is we who are to be blamed, rather than he who is to be thought to do or permit anything not rightly. You know all this; but since you are my other self, what would I more gladly say to you than what I say to myself? We therefore commend both our days and our nights to your holy prayers: pray for us, that we may not use the days intemperately, that we may bear the nights with an even mind, and that, even if we walk in the midst of the shadow of death, the Lord may be with us, so that we fear no evil.

### Scripture references

- Ps 23:4 (22:4 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Profuturus. 'Shadow of death ... fear no evil' echoes Ps 23:4 (22:4 LXX/Vulg.). rhagades and exochades are medical terms (anal fissures and external haemorrhoids); NPNF renders 'a boil or tumour'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 38.1 (CSEL 34.2:64–65; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-1).

## Letter 38.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:65–66
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports the death of the primate Megalius and warns that anger, even just anger, if harboured, grows into hatred.

### Latin text

Quod senex Megalius defunctus sit. iam uos audisse quis dubitet? erant autem a depositione corporis eius, cum haec scriberem, dies ferme uiginti quattuor. utrum iam uideris, disponebas enim, successorem primatus eius, si fieri potest, nosse uolumus. non desunt scandala sed neque refugium; non desunt maerores sed neque consolationes. atque inter haec quam uigilandum sit, ne cuiusquam odium cordis intima teneat neque sinat, ut oremus deum in cubili nostro clauso ostio, sed aduersus ipsum deum claudat ostium, nosti optime, optime frater; subrepit autem, dum nulli irascenti ira sua uidetur iniusta. ita enim inueterescens ira fit odium, dum quasi iusti doloris admixta dulcedo diutius eam in uase detinet, donec totum acescat uasque corrumpat. quapropter multo melius nec iuste cuiquam irascimur, quam uelut iuste irascendo in alicuius odium irae occulta facilitate delabimur. in recipiendis enim hospitibus ignotis solemus dicere multo esse melius malum hominem perpeti quam forsitan per ignorantiam excludi bonum, dum cauemus, ne recipiatur malus. sed in affectibus animi contra est. nam incomparabiliter salubrius est irae etiam iuste pulsanti non aperire penetrale cordis quam admittere non facile recessuram, et peruenturam de surculo ad trabem. audet quippe inpudenter etiam crescere citius, quam putatur. non enim erubescit in tenebris, cum super eam sol occiderit. recolis certe. qua cura et quanta sollicitudine ista scripserim, si recolis. quid mecum nuper in itinere quodam locutus sis.

### English translation (Claude)

That the aged Megalius has died, who doubts that you have already heard? When I wrote this, it was about twenty-four days since his body was laid to rest. We should like to know, if possible, whether you have already seen his successor in the primacy, as you were planning. There is no lack of offences, but no lack of refuge either; no lack of sorrows, but no lack of consolations either. And amid these things you know very well, my very good brother, how watchful we must be, that hatred of anyone may not hold the inmost part of the heart and so not allow us to pray to God in our chamber with the door shut, but shut the door against God himself. It creeps in, moreover, because to no one who is angry does his own anger seem unjust. For so anger, growing old, becomes hatred, while the sweetness mixed with it, as though it were a just grievance, keeps it longer in the vessel, until the whole turns sour and spoils the vessel. Therefore it is much better for us not to be angry with anyone even justly, than, by being angry as though justly, to slip through the hidden ease of anger into hatred of someone. In receiving unknown guests we are accustomed to say that it is much better to put up with a bad man than perhaps through ignorance to shut out a good one, while we take care that a bad one is not received. But in the affections of the soul it is the opposite. For it is incomparably more wholesome not to open the inner chamber of the heart to anger even when it knocks justly, than to admit what will not easily depart and will grow from a twig to a beam. For it dares shamelessly to grow even faster than one thinks; it does not blush in the darkness when the sun has gone down upon it. You surely remember with what care and how much anxiety I have written these things, if you remember what you said to me lately on a certain journey.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:3: echo, medium confidence
- Eph 4:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Megalius was primate of Numidia. 'Pray ... with the door shut' echoes Matt 6:6; 'twig to a beam' echoes Matt 7:3–5; 'the sun has gone down upon it' echoes Eph 4:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 38.2 (CSEL 34.2:65–66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-2).

## Letter 38.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:66–67
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends greetings to Severus and asks Profuturus to urge Victor to return by way of Calama on a matter concerning Nectarius.

### Latin text

Fratrem Seuerum et qui cum eo sunt salutamus. etiam ipsis fortasse scriberemus, si per festinationem perlatoris liceret. peto autem, ut apud eundem fratrem nostrum Victorem, cui ago etiam apud tuam sanctitatem gratias, quod, Constantinam cum pergeret, indicauit, petendo adiuues, propter negotium, quod ipse nouit, de quo grauissimum pondus pro ea re multum deprecantis Nectarii maioris patior, per Calamam remeare ne grauetur; sic enim promisit mihi. uale.

### English translation (Claude)

We greet brother Severus and those who are with him. We would perhaps write to them too, if the haste of the bearer allowed. I ask you to help me by your request to that same brother of ours, Victor, to whom, in the presence of Your Holiness also, I give thanks for letting me know when he was setting out for Constantina, that he not be unwilling to return by way of Calama, because of the business which he knows about, in which I bear a very heavy burden from the elder Nectarius, who is pressing me hard in the matter; for so he promised me. Farewell.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 38.3 (CSEL 34.2:66–67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/36-17/#p-38-3).

## Letter 39.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-39-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:67–68
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome writes to Augustine commending the deacon Praesidius and recalling an earlier letter.

### Latin text

Anno praeterito per fratrem nostrum Asterium hypodiaconum dignationi tuae epistulam miseram promptum reddens salutationis officium, quam tibi arbitror redditam. nunc quoque per sanctum fratrem meum Praesidium diaconum obsecro primum, ut memineris mei, dein, ut baiulum litterarum habeas commendatum et mihi scias germanissimum et, in quibuscumque necessitas postularit, foueas atque sustentes, non quo aliqua re Christo tribuente indigeat, sed quod bonorum amicitias auidissime expetat et se in his coniungendis maximum putet beneficium consecutum. cur autem ad occidentem nauigauerit, ipso poteris narrante cognoscere.

### English translation (Claude)

Last year, by our brother Asterius the subdeacon, I sent Your Worthiness a letter, readily paying the duty of greeting, and I think it was delivered to you. Now too, by my holy brother Praesidius the deacon, I beg you first to remember me, and then to hold the bearer of this letter commended, to know that he is very dear to me, and to cherish and support him in whatever necessity may require; not that by Christ's gift he lacks anything, but because he most eagerly seeks the friendship of good men and thinks that in forming such ties he has gained the greatest benefit. Why he has sailed to the West you will be able to learn from his own account.

### Translation notes

- Letter from Jerome to Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 39.1 (CSEL 34.2:67–68; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-39-1).

## Letter 39.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-39-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:68–69
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome describes the troubles of his monastery, trusts in Christ's victory, and sends greetings to Alypius.

### Latin text

Nos in monasterio constituti uariis hinc inde fluctibus quatimur et peregrinationis molestias sustinemus. sed credimus in eo, qui dixit: Confidite; ego uici mundum, quod ipso tribuente et praesule contra hostem diabolum uictoriam consequamur. sanctum et uenerabilem fratrem nostrum papam Alypium ut meo obsequio salutes, obsecro. sancti fratres, qui nobiscum in monasterio domino seruire festinant, oppido te salutant. incolumem te et memorem mei Christus deus noster tueatur omnipotens, domine uere sancte et suscipiende papa.

### English translation (Claude)

We, settled in a monastery, are shaken by various waves on this side and that and endure the troubles of a sojourn in a foreign land. But we believe in him who said, 'Take courage; I have overcome the world,' that by his gift and protection we shall gain the victory against the enemy, the devil. I beg you to greet with my respects our holy and venerable brother, Pope Alypius. The holy brothers who are eager to serve the Lord with us in the monastery greet you warmly. May Christ our almighty God keep you safe and mindful of me, my lord, truly holy and revered pope.

### Scripture references

- John 16:33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of John 16:33. 'Papa' (pope) was then a title of honour for any bishop.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 39.2 (CSEL 34.2:68–69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-39-2).

## Letter 40.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:69–71
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Jerome for his letter, asks for a regular correspondence, and says he knows Jerome through his books.

### Latin text

Habeo gratiam, quod pro subscripta salutatione plenam mihi epistulam reddidisti sed breuiorem multo, quam ex te uellem sumere tali uiro, a quo, tempora quanta libet occupet, nullus sermo prolixus est. quamquam itaque nos negotiorum alienorum eorumque saecularium curis circumstemur ingentibus, tamen epistulae tuae breuitati facile non ignoscerem, nisi cogitarem, quam paucioribus uerbis meis redderetur. quare adgredere, quaeso, istam nobiscum litterariam conlocutionem, ne multum ad nos disiungendos liceat absentiae corporali, quamquam simus in domino spiritus unitate coniuncti, etiam si ab stilo quiescamus et taceamus. et libri quidem, quos de horreo dominico elaborasti, paene te totum nobis exhibent. si enim propterea te non nouimus, quia faciem corporis tui non uidimus, hoc modo nec ipse te nosti, nam tu quoque non uides eam. si autem tibi non ob aliud notus es, nisi quia nosti animum tuum, et nos eum non mediocriter nouimus in litteris tuis, in quibus benedicimus domino quod tibi et nobis omnibusque fratribus, qui tua legunt, te talem dedit.

### English translation (Claude)

I thank you that in return for a greeting written at the foot of a letter you have sent me a full letter, but much shorter than I would wish to receive from such a man as you, from whom no discourse is long, however much time it takes. And so, although we are surrounded by huge cares over the business of others, and secular business at that, I would not easily pardon the brevity of your letter, if I did not consider with how many fewer words of mine it was a reply. Therefore, I beg you, enter on this conversation by letter with us, so that bodily absence may not have much power to separate us, although we are joined in the Lord by unity of spirit, even if we rest from the pen and keep silent. And indeed the books you have produced from the Lord's granary show you to us almost entirely. For if we do not know you because we have not seen the face of your body, in that way you do not know yourself either, for you do not see it. But if you are known to yourself for no other reason than that you know your own mind, we too know it not slightly in your writings, in which we bless the Lord that he has given you, such as you are, to yourself and to us and to all the brothers who read your works.

### Translation notes

- Letter from Augustine to Jerome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.1 (CSEL 34.2:69–71; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-1).

## Letter 40.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:71
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks why Jerome's catalogue of church writers bears the title 'Epitaphium' when it includes living authors.

### Latin text

Liber quidam tuus inter cetera non diu est ut uenit in manus nostras. quae sit eius inscriptio, nescimus adhuc; non enim hoc codex ipse, ut adsolet, in liminari pagina praetendebat. epitaphium tamen appellari dicebat frater, apud quem inuentus est. quod ei nomen tibi placuisse ut inderetur, crederemus, si eorum tantum uel uitas uel scripta ibi legissemus, qui iam defuncti essent. cum uero multorum et eo tempore, quo scribebatur, et nunc usque uiuentium ibi commemorentur opuscula, miramur, cur hunc ei titulum uel inposueris uel inposuisse credaris. sane utiliter a te conscriptum eundem librum satis adprobamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Not long ago a certain book of yours came into our hands among other things. What its title is we do not yet know; for the codex itself did not display it on the first page, as is usual. But the brother with whom it was found said that it was called Epitaphium. We would believe that you were pleased to have this name given to it, if we had read there the lives or writings only of those already dead. But since the works of many who were living both when it was written and still now are mentioned there, we wonder why you either gave it this title or are believed to have given it. We fully approve the book itself as usefully written by you.

### Translation notes

- The book is Jerome's On Illustrious Men (De viris illustribus).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.2 (CSEL 34.2:71; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-2).

## Letter 40.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:71–73
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine objects that Jerome's view of Gal 2, that Paul's rebuke of Peter was a dutiful pretence, would destroy the authority of Scripture.

### Latin text

In expositione quoque epistulae Pauli apostoli ad Galatas inuenimus aliquid, quod nos multum moueat. si enim ad scripturas sanctas admissa fuerint uelut officiosa mendacia, quid in eis remanebit auctoritatis? quae tandem de scripturis illis sententia proferetur, cuius pondere contentiosae falsitatis obteratur inprobitas? statim enim, ut protuleris, si aliter sapit, qui contra nititur, dicit illud, quod prolatum erit, honesto aliquo officio scriptorem fuisse mentitum. ubi enim hoc non poterit, si potuit in ea narratione, quam exorsus apostolus ait: Quae autem scribo uobis, ecce coram deo, quia non mentior, credi adfirmarique mentitus eo loco, ubi dixit de Petro et Barnaba: Cum uiderem, quia non recte ingrediuntur ad ueritatem euangelii? si enim recte illi ingrediebantur, iste mentitus est; si autem ibi mentitus est, ubi uerum dixit? an ibi uerum dixisse uidebitur, ubi hoc dixerit, quod lector sapit, cum uero contra sensum lectoris aliquid occurrerit, officioso mendacio deputabitur? non enim deesse poterunt causae, cur existimetur non solum potuisse uerum etiam debuisse mentiri, si huic regulae conceditur locus. non opus est hanc causam multis uerbis agere praesertim apud te, cui sapienter prouidenti dictum sat est. nequaquam uero mihi adrogauerim, ut ingenium tuum diuino dono aureum meis obolis ditare contendam, nec est quisquam te magis idoneus, qui opus illud emendet.

### English translation (Claude)

In your exposition of the apostle Paul's letter to the Galatians, too, we have found something that troubles us greatly. For if lies told as if from a sense of duty are admitted into the holy Scriptures, what authority will remain in them? What sentence will at last be brought forward from those Scriptures by whose weight the wickedness of contentious falsehood may be crushed? For as soon as you have brought it forward, if your opponent thinks otherwise, he will say that in the passage brought forward the writer lied from some honourable motive of duty. For where will this not be possible, if in that narrative which the apostle began by saying, 'What I am writing to you, behold, before God, I am not lying,' it could be believed and affirmed that he lied in the place where he said of Peter and Barnabas, 'When I saw that they were not walking straight toward the truth of the gospel'? For if they were walking straight, he lied; and if he lied there, where did he tell the truth? Or will he be thought to have told the truth where he says what the reader thinks, but when something meets the reader against his own opinion, it will be put down to a dutiful lie? For reasons will not be lacking why he may be thought not only to have been able, but even obliged, to lie, if place is granted to this rule. There is no need to argue this case at length, especially with you, to whose wise foresight a word is enough. Far be it from me to presume to try to enrich your talent, golden by divine gift, with my small coins; nor is anyone better fitted than you to correct that work.

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Jerome–Augustine dispute over Gal 2:11–14. Quotations of Gal 1:20 and Gal 2:14. The 'dutiful lie' (officiosum mendacium) is a lie told for a good purpose.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.3 (CSEL 34.2:71–73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-3).

## Letter 40.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:73–74
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul's becoming 'as a Jew' was an act of compassion, not pretence, and that he kept the Jewish rites without hope of salvation in them.

### Latin text

Neque enim a me docendus es, quo modo intellegatur, quod idem dicit: Factus sum Iudaeis tamquam Iudaeus, ut Iudaeos lucrifacerem, et cetera, quae ibi dicuntur compassione misericordi, non simulatione fallaci. fit enim tamquam aegrotus, qui ministrat aegroto, non cum se febres habere mentitur, sed cum animo condolentis cogitat, quem ad modum sibi seruiri uellet, si ipse aegrotaret. nam utique Iudaeus erat, Christianus autem factus non Iudaeorum sacramenta reliquerat, quae conuenienter ille populus et legitime tempore, quo oportebat, acceperat. ideoque suscepit ea celebranda, cum iam Christi esset apostolus, sed ut doceret non esse perniciosa his, qui ea uellent, sicut a parentibus per legem acceperant, custodire, etiam cum in Christum credidissent, non tamen in eis iam constituerent spem salutis, quoniam per dominum Iesum salus ipsa, quae illis sacramentis significabatur, aduenerat. ideoque gentibus, quod insuetos a fide reuocarent onere graui et non necessario, nullo modo inponenda esse censebat.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor need I teach you how to understand what the same apostle says: 'To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win the Jews,' and the rest that is said there out of merciful compassion, not deceitful pretence. For one who nurses a sick man becomes as one sick, not when he falsely claims to have a fever, but when with a sympathizing mind he considers how he would wish to be served if he himself were sick. For he was certainly a Jew, and when he became a Christian he had not abandoned the sacraments of the Jews, which that people had received fittingly and lawfully at the time when it was right. And so he undertook to celebrate them even when he was already an apostle of Christ, but in order to teach that they were not harmful to those who wished to keep them as they had received them from their parents through the law, even when they had believed in Christ, provided they did not now place in them their hope of salvation, since through the Lord Jesus the very salvation signified by those sacraments had come. And for that reason he held that they were in no way to be imposed on the Gentiles, lest by a heavy and unnecessary burden they should turn back from the faith those who were unaccustomed to them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of 1 Cor 9:20. 'Sacraments' here means the rites of the law.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.4 (CSEL 34.2:73–74; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-4).

## Letter 40.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:74–75
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds that Paul truly rebuked Peter for compelling Gentiles to judaize, and that admitting a lie in Scripture would make it all doubtful.

### Latin text

Quapropter non ideo Petrum emendauit, quod paternas traditiones obseruaret, quod si facere uellet, nec mendaciter nec incongrue faceret, quamuis enim iam superflua tamen solita non nocerent, sed quoniam gentes cogebat iudaizare, quod nullo modo posset, nisi ea sic ageret, tamquam adhuc etiam post domini aduentum necessaria saluti forent. quod uehementer per apostolatum Pauli ueritas dissuasit. nec apostolus Petrus hoc ignorabat, sed id faciebat timens eos, qui ex circumcisione erant. ita et ipse uere correctus est et Paulus uera narrauit, ne sancta scriptura, quae ad fidem posteris edita est, admissa auctoritate mendacii tota dubia nutet et fluctuet. non enim potest aut oportet litteris explicari, quanta et quam inexplicabilia mala consequantur, si hoc concesserimus; posset autem opportune minusque periculose demonstrari, si coram inter nos conloqueremur.

### English translation (Claude)

So he did not correct Peter because he kept the traditions of his fathers; if Peter wished to do that, he would do it neither falsely nor unfittingly, for though they were now superfluous, being customary they did no harm. He corrected him because he was compelling the Gentiles to live like Jews, which he could not do unless he observed those things as though they were still necessary for salvation even after the Lord's coming. This the truth strongly opposed through the apostleship of Paul. Nor was the apostle Peter ignorant of this, but he did it fearing those who were of the circumcision. Thus he was truly corrected, and Paul narrated true things, lest holy Scripture, published for the faith of later generations, should, once the authority of a lie is admitted, totter and waver as wholly doubtful. For it neither can nor should be set out in a letter how great and how inextricable are the evils that follow if we grant this; but it could be shown conveniently and with less danger if we spoke together face to face.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:12: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Gal 2:12–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.5 (CSEL 34.2:74–75; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-5).

## Letter 40.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:75–77
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that what Paul counted as loss was Jewish error, not the law's rites, and that his becoming all things to all was compassion, not pretence.

### Latin text

Hoc ergo Iudaeorum Paulus dimiserat, quod malum habebant, et in primis illud, quod ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam iustitiam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti; deinde quod post passionem et resurrectionem Christi dato ac manifestato sacramento gratiae secundum ordinem Melchisedech adhuc putabant uetera sacramenta non ex consuetudine sollemnitatis sed ex necessitate salutis esse celebranda, quae tamen si numquam fuissent necessaria, infructuose atque inaniter pro eis Machabaei martyres fierent; postremo illud, quod praedicatores gratiae Christianos Iudaei tamquam hostes legis persequebantur. hos atque huius modi errores et uitia dicit se damna et stercora arbitratum, ut Christum lucrifaceret, non obseruationes legis, si more patrio celebrarentur, sicut ab ipso celebratae sunt sine ulla salutis necessitate, sicut Iudaei celebrandas putabant, aut fallaci simulatione, quod in Petro reprehenderat. nam si propterea illa sacramenta celebrauit, quia simulauit se Iudaeum, ut illos lucrifaceret, cur non etiam sacrificauit cum gentibus, quia et his, qui sine lege erant, tamquam sine lege factus est, ut eos quoque lucrifaceret, nisi quia et illud fecit ut natura Iudaeus et hoc totum dixit, non ut fallaciter se fingeret esse, quod non erat, sed ut misericorditer ita subueniendum esse sentiret, ac si ipse in eodem errore laboraret, non scilicet mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu? sicut eo ipso loco generaliter intulit: Factus sum infirmis infirmus, ut infirmos lucrifacerem, ut sequens conclusio: Omnibus omnia factus sum, ut omnes lucrifacerem, ad hoc referenda intellegatur, ut cuiusque infirmitatem tamquam in se ipso miseratus appareat. non enim et cum diceret: Quis infirmatur et ego non infirmor? infirmitatem alterius simulasse potius quam condoluisse uolebat intellegi.

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, of the Jews' Paul had given up, which was evil in them: first, that being ignorant of God's righteousness and wishing to establish their own, they did not submit to the righteousness of God; next, that after the passion and resurrection of Christ, when the sacrament of grace according to the order of Melchizedek had been given and made manifest, they still thought the old sacraments must be celebrated not by the custom of a festival but by necessity for salvation; and yet if they had never been necessary, the Maccabean martyrs would have died for them fruitlessly and in vain; lastly, that the Jews persecuted the Christian preachers of grace as enemies of the law. These and such errors and faults he says he counted loss and dung that he might gain Christ, not the observances of the law if they were celebrated by ancestral custom, as they were celebrated by him without any necessity for salvation, not as the Jews thought they must be celebrated, nor by deceitful pretence, which he had rebuked in Peter. For if he celebrated those sacraments because he pretended to be a Jew in order to win them, why did he not also sacrifice with the Gentiles, since to those too who were without law he became as without law, that he might win them also? Was it not because he did the one as a Jew by birth, and said the other not in order to pretend falsely to be what he was not, but because he felt that he must help them mercifully, as if he himself laboured under the same error, not with the cunning of a liar but with the feeling of one who suffers with them? So in that same place he added generally: 'To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak,' so that the conclusion which follows, 'I became all things to all men, that I might win all,' should be understood as referring to this, that he showed compassion for each one's weakness as if it were his own. For when he said, 'Who is weak, and I am not weak?' he did not wish it to be understood that he pretended another's weakness rather than shared his pain.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 110:4 (109:4 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:8: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:22: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 6–7 (2 Maccabees): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Rom 10:3; Ps 110:4 / Heb 5–7 (order of Melchizedek); Phil 3:8; quotations of 1 Cor 9:21–22 and 2 Cor 11:29. The Maccabean martyrs: 2 Macc 6–7. Augustine's statements about the Jews are given as he wrote them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.6 (CSEL 34.2:75–77; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-6).

## Letter 40.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:77–78
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Jerome to retract his interpretation, comparing the truth Christians die for with the Helen of the Greeks.

### Latin text

Quare arripe, obsecro te, ingenuam et uere Christianam cum caritate seueritatem ad illud opus corrigendum atque emendandum et παλινῳδίαν, ut dicitur, cane. incomparabiliter enim pulchrior est ueritas Christianorum quam Helena Graecorum. pro ista enim fortius nostri martyres aduersus hanc Sodomam quam pro illa illi heroes aduersus Troiam dimicauerunt. neque hoc ego dico, ut oculos cordis recipias, quos absit ut amiseris, sed ut aduertas, quos cum habeas sanos et uigiles, nescio qua dissimulatione auertisti, ut non intenderes, quae consequantur aduersa, si semel creditum fuerit posse honeste ac pie scriptorem diuinorum librorum in aliqua sui operis parte mentiri.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore take up, I beg you, a frank and truly Christian severity joined with love to correct and amend that work, and 'sing a palinode,' as the saying is. For the truth of Christians is incomparably more beautiful than the Helen of the Greeks. For our martyrs fought for it more bravely against this Sodom than those heroes fought for her against Troy. I do not say this so that you may recover the eyes of your heart, which God forbid you should have lost, but that you may turn them to it; for though you have them sound and wakeful, by some dissembling or other you have turned them away so as not to attend to the adverse consequences that follow if it is once believed that the writer of the divine books could honourably and piously lie in any part of his work.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Stesichorus (Stesichorus): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The 'palinode' alludes to Stesichorus's recantation of his poem on Helen; the Greek word is restored from the garbled digital text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.7 (CSEL 34.2:77–78; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-7).

## Letter 40.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:78–79
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine mentions an earlier letter that was never delivered and asks pardon if Jerome's view proves the better.

### Latin text

Scripseram iam hinc aliquando ad te epistulam, quae non perlata est, quia nec perrexit, cui perferendam tradideram. ex qua illud mihi suggestum est, cum ista dictarem, quod in hac quoque praetermittere non debui, ut, si alia est sententia tua eademque est melior, timori meo libenter ignoscas. si enim aliter sentis uerumque tu sentis — nam nisi uerum sit, melius esse non potest —, ut non dicam nulla, certe non magna culpa meus error ueritati fauet, si recte in quoquam ueritas potest fauere mendacio.

### English translation (Claude)

I had written you a letter from here once before, which was not delivered, because the person to whom I had given it to carry did not go. From it this occurred to me as I dictated this one, which I ought not to leave out here either: that if your opinion is different and better, you will gladly pardon my fear. For if you think otherwise and think truly (for unless it is true it cannot be better), then my error, if not no fault, is at least no great fault, since it favours truth, if truth can rightly favour a lie in anyone.

### Translation notes

- The undelivered letter is Letter 28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.8 (CSEL 34.2:78–79; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-8).

## Letter 40.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:79–81
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to state Origen's errors and to write a short handbook of all heresies, and commends the bearer Paul.

### Latin text

De Origene autem quod rescribere dignatus es, iam sciebam non tantum in ecclesiasticis litteris sed in omnibus recta et uera, quae inuenerimus, adprobare atque laudare, falsa uero et praua inprobare atque reprehendere. sed illud de prudentia doctrinaque tua desiderabam et adhuc desidero, ut nota nobis facias ea ipsa eius errata, quibus a fide ueritatis ille uir tantus recessisse conuincitur. in libro etiam, quo cunctos, quorum meminisse potuisti, scriptores ecclesiasticos et eorum scripta commemorasti, commodius, ut arbitror, fieret, si nominatis eis, quos haeresiotas esse nosti, quando ne ipsos quidem praetermittere uolueris, subiungeres etiam, in quibus cauendi essent, quamquam nonnullos etiam praeterieris. quod scire cuperem, quo consilio factum sit, aut, si illud uolumen forte onerare noluisti, ut commemoratis haereticis non adderes, in quibus eos catholica damnarit auctoritas, quaeso, ne graue sit litterario labori tuo, quo non mediocriter per domini nostri gratiam in latina lingua sanctorum studia et accendisti et adiuuisti, id quod tibi per humilitatem meam fraterna caritas indicit, ut, si occupationes tuae sinent, omnium haereticorum peruersa dogmata, qui rectitudinem fidei Christianae usque ad hoc tempus uel inpudentia uel peruicacia deprauare conati sunt, uno libello breuiter digesta edas in notitiam eorum, quibus aut non uacat propter alia negotia aut non ualent propter alienam linguam tam multa legere atque cognoscere. diu te rogarem, nisi hoc soleret esse indicium minus de caritate praesumentis. hunc interea Paulum fratrem nostrum in Christo multum commendo benignitati tuae, cuius in nostris regionibus existimationi bonum coram deo testimonium perhibemus.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you were good enough to write back about Origen, I already knew that not only in church writings but in all writings we should approve and praise what is right and true that we find, and disapprove and censure what is false and wrong. But what I desired, and still desire, from your wisdom and learning is that you make known to us the very errors by which that great man is shown to have departed from the true faith. In the book, too, in which you listed all the church writers you could remember and their writings, it would have been more convenient, I think, if, after naming those whom you knew to be heretics (since you did not wish to pass over even them), you had added in what respects they were to be avoided; although you have also passed over some, and I should like to know with what intention this was done. Or if you did not wish to overload that volume by adding, after naming the heretics, in what respects Catholic authority had condemned them, I ask that it not be burdensome to your literary labour, by which through the grace of our Lord you have kindled and helped not a little the studies of the saints in the Latin tongue, to do what brotherly love lays on you through my lowliness: that, if your occupations allow, you publish in one short book a summary of the perverse teachings of all the heretics who up to this time have tried to distort the straightness of the Christian faith by shamelessness or obstinacy, for the information of those who either have no leisure because of other business or are unable, because of a foreign tongue, to read and learn so much. I would ask you at length, if this were not usually a sign of one who presumes too little on love. Meanwhile I warmly commend to your kindness this Paul, our brother in Christ, to whose good reputation in our regions we bear good witness before God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 40.9 (CSEL 34.2:79–81; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-40-9).

## Letter 41.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-41-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:81–83
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine rejoice that Aurelius has had presbyters preach to the people in his presence.

### Latin text

Impletum est gaudio os nostrum et lingua nostra exultatione nuntiantibus litteris tuis sanctam cogitationem tuam adiuuante domino, qui eam inspirauit, ad effectum esse perductam de omnibus ordinatis fratribus nostris et praecipue de sermone presbyterorum, qui te praesente populo infunditur. per quorum linguas clamat caritas tua maiore uoce in cordibus hominum quam illi in auribus. deo gratias. nam quid melius et animo geramus et ore promamus et calamo exprimamus quam deo gratias? hoc nec dici breuius nec audiri laetius nec intellegi grandius nec agi fructuosius potest. deo gratias, qui te et tam fideli pectore ditauit erga filios tuos et id, quod in intimo animae habebas, quo humanus oculus non penetrat, eduxit in lucem donando tibi, non solum ut bene uelles, uerum etiam in quibus posset apparere, quod uelles. ita plane fiat, fiat. luceant haec opera coram hominibus, uideant, gaudeant, glorificent patrem, qui in caelis est; talibus delecteris in domino, ipse te pro eis orantem dignetur exaudire, quem tu per eos loquentem non dedignaris audire; eatur, ambuletur, curratur in uia domini; benedicantur pusilli cum magnis iucundati in his, qui dicunt eis: In domum domini ibimus; praecedant illi et sequantur isti imitatores facti eorum sicut et illi Christi; ferueat iter sanctarum formicarum, fraglent opera sanctarum apum, feratur fructus in tolerantia cum salute perseuerandi usque in finem nec sinat dominus temptari supra, quam possumus ferre, sed faciat, cum temptatione etiam exitum ut possimus sustinere.

### English translation (Claude)

Our mouth has been filled with joy and our tongue with exultation, since your letter tells us that your holy plan has, with the help of the Lord who inspired it, been carried into effect concerning all our ordained brothers, and especially concerning the preaching of the presbyters, which is poured out to the people in your presence. Through their tongues your Charity cries with a louder voice in the hearts of men than they do in their ears. Thanks be to God! For what better can we bear in mind, utter with the mouth, or express with the pen than 'Thanks be to God'? Nothing can be said more briefly, heard more gladly, understood more grandly, or done more fruitfully. Thanks be to God, who has enriched you with so faithful a heart toward your sons, and has brought to light what you had in the depth of your soul, where the human eye does not penetrate, by granting you not only to will well but also the means by which what you willed could appear. So let it be, let it be. Let these works shine before men; let them see, rejoice, and glorify the Father who is in heaven; may you delight in such men in the Lord; may he deign to hear you praying for them, whom you do not disdain to hear speaking through them. Let them go, let them walk, let them run in the way of the Lord; let the small be blessed with the great, gladdened by those who say to them, 'We will go into the house of the Lord'; let those go before and these follow, imitators of them as they are of Christ; let the path of the holy ants be busy, let the works of the holy bees be fragrant; let fruit be borne in patience, with the saving gift of persevering to the end; and may the Lord not allow us to be tempted beyond what we can bear, but with the temptation also make a way of escape, that we may be able to endure it.

### Scripture references

- Ps 126:2 (125:2 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 115:13 (113:21 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 122:1 (121:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 8:15: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 10:22: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 10:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Bishop Aurelius of Carthage, from Alypius and Augustine. Echoes Ps 126:2 (125:2 LXX/Vulg.), Matt 5:16, Ps 115:13 (113:21 LXX/Vulg.), Ps 122:1 (121:1 LXX/Vulg.), 1 Cor 11:1, Luke 8:15, Matt 10:22, 1 Cor 10:13. Presbyters preaching in a bishop's presence was then unusual in Africa.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 41.1 (CSEL 34.2:81–83; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-41-1).

## Letter 41.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-41-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:83–84
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine ask Aurelius for copies of the presbyters' sermons and his opinion of Tyconius's seven rules.

### Latin text

Orate pro nobis digni exaudiri; cum tanto quippe sacrificio acceditis ad deum sincerissimae dilectionis et laudis eius in operibus uestris. orate, ut etiam nobis haec luceant, quoniam nouit ille, quem oratis, cum quanto nostro gaudio uobis luceant. haec sunt uota nostra, haec multitudines solatiorum secundum multitudinem dolorum nostrorum in corde nostro iucundant animam nostram. ita est, quia ita promissum est; ita erit. quod restat, sicut promissum est. obsecramus te per eum, qui tibi ista donauit et populum, cui seruis, hac per te benedictione perfudit, ut iubeas singulos, quos uolueris, sermones eorum conscriptos et emendatos mitti nobis. nam et ego, quod iussisti, non neglego et de Tychonii septem regulis uel clauibus, sicut saepe iam scripsi, cognoscere, quid tibi uideatur, expecto. Fratrem Hilarinum, Hipponiensem archiatrum et principalem, multum commendamus. nam de fratre Romano quid satagas, nouimus nihilque petendum est, nisi ut te pro illo adiuuet dominus. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

Pray for us, you who are worthy to be heard; for you draw near to God with so great a sacrifice of most sincere love and of his praise in your works. Pray that these things may shine for us too, since he to whom you pray knows with how great joy of ours they shine for you. These are our prayers; these, the multitude of comforts according to the multitude of sorrows in our heart, gladden our soul. So it is, because so it was promised; so it will be, what remains, as it was promised. We beseech you, by him who gave you these things and through you poured this blessing on the people you serve, to order that any particular sermons of theirs you choose be written down, corrected, and sent to us. For I too am not neglecting what you commanded; and I am waiting to know what you think of Tyconius's seven rules or keys, as I have often written already. We warmly commend brother Hilarinus, chief physician and leading citizen of Hippo. As for brother Romanus, we know what you are doing, and nothing need be asked except that the Lord help you on his behalf. Amen.

### Scripture references

- Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Echo of Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX/Vulg.). Tyconius was a Donatist writer whose Book of Rules Augustine valued.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 41.2 (CSEL 34.2:83–84; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-41-2).

## Letter 42.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-42-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:84–85
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reproaches Paulinus and Therasia for not answering for two years and asks after Paulinus's work against paganism.

### Latin text

Num etiam hoc sperari aut expectari posset, ut per fratrem Seuerum rescripta flagitaremus tam diu tam ardentibus nobis a uestra caritate non reddita? quid est, qui duas aestates easdemque in Africa sitire cogamur? quid amplius dicam? o qui res uestras cotidie donatis, debitum reddite. an forte, quod aduersus daemonicolas te scribere audieram atque id opus uehementer desiderare me ostenderam, uolens perficere ac mittere tanto tempore ad nos epistulas distulisti? utinam saltem tam opima mensa iam annosum ab stilo tuo ieiunium meum tandem accipias! quae si nondum parata est, non desinemus conqueri, si nos, dum illud perficis, non interim reficis. Salutate fratres, maxime Romanum et Agilem. hinc, qui nobiscum sunt, uos salutant et parum nobiscum irascuntur, si parum diligunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Could even this have been hoped for or expected: that through brother Severus we should have to demand a reply which your Charity has not returned to us, though we have waited so long and so ardently? Why are we forced to thirst through two summers, and those in Africa? What more shall I say? O you who give away your own goods daily, pay what you owe! Or perhaps, because I had heard that you were writing against the worshippers of demons and had shown that I greatly desired that work, you have put off sending us letters for so long because you wished to finish it and send it? If only, by so rich a table, you would at last receive my fast from your pen, which has now lasted a year! If it is not yet ready, we will not stop complaining unless, while you are completing that, you refresh us in the meantime. Greet the brothers, especially Romanus and Agilis. From here those who are with us greet you, and they are only a little angry with us if they love you only a little.

### Translation notes

- To Paulinus of Nola and Therasia. The final clause is compressed in the Latin: the friends' anger at the delay is a measure of their love. 'Receive my fast' (accipias) is as printed; the sense may be 'break' or 'relieve'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 42.1 (CSEL 34.2:84–85; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-42-1).

## Letter 43.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:85–86
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that those who hold an inherited error without obstinacy are not heretics, and that love obliges him to write to Donatists.

### Latin text

Dixit quidem apostolus Paulus: Haereticum hominem post unam correptionem deuita sciens, quia subuersus est eius modi et peccat et est a semet ipso damnatus. sed qui sententiam suam quamuis falsam atque peruersam nulla pertinaci animositate defendunt, praesertim quam non audacia praesumptionis suae pepererunt, sed a seductis atque in errorem lapsis parentibus acceperunt, quaerunt autem cauta sollicitudine ueritatem corrigi parati, cum inuenerint, nequaquam sunt inter haereticos deputandi. tales ergo uos nisi esse crederem, nullas fortasse uobis litteras mitterem, quamquam et ipsum haereticum quamlibet odiosa superbia tumidum et peruicacia malae contentionis insanum sicut uitandum monemus, ne infirmos et paruulos fallat, ita non abnuimus, quibuscumque modis possumus, corrigendum. unde factum est, ut etiam ad nonnullos Donatistarum primarios scriberemus non communicatorias litteras, quas iam olim propter suam peruersitatem ab unitate catholica, quae toto orbe diffusa est, non accipiunt, sed tales priuatas, qualibus nobis uti etiam ad paganos licet. quas illi etsi aliquando legerunt, respondere tamen eis siue noluerunt siue, ut magis creditur, nequiuerunt. ubi nobis satis uisum est impleuisse nos officium caritatis, quam non solum nostris sed et omnibus nos debere sanctus spiritus docet, qui nobis ait per apostolum: Vos autem dominus multiplicet et abundare faciat in caritate in inuicem et in omnes. monet etiam alio loco in modestia corripiendos diuersa sentientes: Ne forte, inquit, det illis deus paenitentiam ad cognoscendam ueritatem et resipiscant de diaboli laqueis captiuati ab ipso in ipsius uoluntatem.

### English translation (Claude)

The apostle Paul indeed said: 'Avoid a heretic after one rebuke, knowing that such a man is perverted and sins and is condemned by himself.' But those who defend their opinion, however false and perverse, with no stubborn animosity, especially an opinion which they did not produce by their own presumptuous boldness but received from parents who had been led astray and fallen into error, and who seek the truth with careful concern, ready to be corrected when they find it, are by no means to be counted among heretics. If I did not believe you to be such, I would perhaps send you no letter; although, while we warn that even the heretic himself, however swollen with hateful pride and mad with the obstinacy of evil contention, is to be avoided lest he deceive the weak and the little ones, we do not refuse to correct him by whatever means we can. Hence it is that we have written even to some of the leading Donatists, not letters of communion, which for a long time now, because of their perversity, they do not receive from the Catholic unity spread throughout the whole world, but private letters such as we may use even toward pagans. Though they have sometimes read them, they have either been unwilling or, as is more likely, unable to answer them. In this we thought we had sufficiently fulfilled the duty of love, which the Holy Spirit teaches that we owe not only to our own but to all, saying to us through the apostle: 'May the Lord make you increase and abound in love for one another and for all.' He also warns in another place that those who think otherwise should be corrected in gentleness: 'In case,' he says, 'God may grant them repentance to know the truth, and they may come to their senses out of the snares of the devil, by whom they have been taken captive to do his will.'

### Scripture references

- Titus 3:10: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 3:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:25: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Glorius, Eleusius, the Felixes, Grammaticus and other Donatists. Quotations of Titus 3:10–11, 1 Thess 3:12, 2 Tim 2:25–26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.1 (CSEL 34.2:85–86; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-1).

## Letter 43.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:86
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends writing to the Donatists about their souls, citing the blessing on peacemakers.

### Latin text

Haec praelocutus sum, ne quis me existimet inpudentius uobis quam prudentius scripta misisse et hoc modo uobiscum de negotio animae uestrae aliquid agere uoluisse, quia nostrae communionis non estis, cum tamen si de negotio fundi aut alicuius pecuniariae litis dirimendae uobis aliquid scriberem, nemo fortasse reprehenderet. usque adeo carus est hic mundus hominibus et sibimet ipsi uiluerunt. erit igitur mihi ad defensionem testis haec epistula in iudicio dei, qui nouit, quo animo fecerim, et qui dixit: Beati pacifici, quia ipsi filii dei uocabuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said this first, so that no one may think I have sent you a letter with more impudence than prudence, and have wished in this way to treat with you about the business of your soul because you are not of our communion; though if I wrote to you about the business of a farm or the settling of some money dispute, no one perhaps would blame me. So dear is this world to men, and so cheap have they become to themselves! This letter, then, will be a witness for my defence at the judgement of God, who knows with what intention I have acted, and who said: 'Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 5:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.2 (CSEL 34.2:86; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-2).

## Letter 43.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:86–87
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls the debate at which the Donatists produced the acts condemning Caecilian, and he answered that Secundus of Tigisis had pardoned confessed traitors who later condemned Caecilian.

### Latin text

Ergo, ut meminisse dignamini, cum essemus in uestra ciuitate et nonnulla uobiscum de communione Christianae unitatis ageremus, prolata sunt a partibus uestris gesta quaedam, quibus recitatum est, quod septuaginta ferme episcopi Caecilianum quondam nostrae communionis episcopum Carthaginiensis ecclesiae cum suis collegis et ordinatoribus damnauerunt. ubi etiam Felicis Aptungitani causa multo prae ceteris inuidiosius et criminosius uentilata est. quae cum essent cuncta perlecta, respondimus non esse mirandum, si homines, qui tunc illud schisma fecerunt, non sine confectione gestorum eos, in quos fuerant ab aemulis et perditis concitati, absentes causa incognita temere damnandos esse putauerunt; nos autem habere alia gesta ecclesiastica, in quibus Secundus Tigisitanus, qui tunc agebat in Numidia primatum, praesentes et confessos traditores reliquit deo iudicandos et eos in episcopalibus sedibus, sicuti erant, manere permisit, quorum nomina inter damnatores Caeciliani numerantur, cum etiam Secundus ipse concilii eiusdem principatum teneret, ubi absentes quasi traditores per eorum sententias damnauit, quibus praesentibus et confessis ignouit.

### English translation (Claude)

As you will be good enough to remember, then, when we were in your city and were discussing with you some matters concerning the communion of Christian unity, certain records were produced by your party, in which it was read out that about seventy bishops once condemned Caecilian, bishop of the church of Carthage, of our communion, together with his colleagues and those who ordained him. There the case of Felix of Aptunga was also aired with much more ill will and accusation than the rest. When all these had been read through, we answered that it was not surprising if the men who then made that schism thought that those against whom they had been stirred up by rivals and abandoned men should be rashly condemned in their absence, without a hearing, and not without drawing up records; but that we had other church records, in which Secundus of Tigisis, who then held the primacy in Numidia, left to God's judgement traitors who were present and confessed, and allowed them to remain in their episcopal sees as they were; and their names are counted among the condemners of Caecilian, while Secundus himself presided over that same council, where, through the votes of those whom he had pardoned when they were present and confessed, he condemned absent men as traitors.

### Translation notes

- 'Traitors' (traditores) were clergy who handed over the Scriptures in the persecution of 303–305. The council was that of the seventy Numidian bishops at Carthage (312).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.3 (CSEL 34.2:86–87; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-3).

## Letter 43.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:87–88
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine summarizes how Caecilian was vindicated at Rome under Miltiades, at Arles, and by Constantine, and Felix of Aptunga by the proconsul.

### Latin text

Deinde diximus aliquanto post Maiorini ordinationem, quem contra Caecilianum nefario scelere leuauerunt erigentes altare contra altare et unitatem Christi discordiis furialibus dissipantes, eos petisse a Constantino tunc imperatore iudices episcopos, qui de suis quaestionibus, quae in Africa exortae pacis uinculum dirimebant, arbitro medio iudicarent. quod postea quam factum est, praesente Caeciliano et illis, qui aduersus eum nauigauerant, iudicante Melchiade tunc Romanae urbis episcopo cum collegis suis, quos ad preces Donatistarum miserat imperator, nihil in Caeciliano probari potuisse ac per hoc illo in episcopatu confirmato Donatum, qui aduersus eum tunc aderat, inprobatum. quibus peractis rebus cum illi omnes in pertinacia scelestissimi schismatis permanerent, post apud Arelatum memoratum imperatorem eandem causam diligentius examinandam terminandamque curasse, illos uero ab ecclesiastico iudicio prouocasse, ut causam Constantinus audiret. quo postea quam uentum est, utraque parte adsistente innocentem Caecilianum fuisse iudicatum atque illos recessisse superatos et in eadem tamen peruersitate mansisse. nec de Felicis Aptungitani causa neglegentiam consecutam, sed ad eiusdem principis iussionem proconsularibus gestis etiam ipsum fuisse purgatum.

### English translation (Claude)

We then said that some time after the ordination of Majorinus, whom they set up against Caecilian with wicked crime, raising altar against altar and tearing apart the unity of Christ with frenzied discord, they asked Constantine, then emperor, for bishops as judges, to judge as impartial arbiters their disputes which had arisen in Africa and were breaking the bond of peace. After this was done, in the presence of Caecilian and of those who had sailed to accuse him, with Miltiades, then bishop of the city of Rome, as judge, together with his colleagues whom the emperor had sent at the Donatists' request, nothing could be proved against Caecilian; and so he was confirmed in the episcopate, and Donatus, who was then present against him, was condemned. When this was done, and they all persisted in the obstinacy of a most criminal schism, the emperor afterwards had the same case examined more carefully and settled at Arles; but they appealed from the church's judgement for Constantine to hear the case. When it came to that, with both parties present, Caecilian was judged innocent, and they withdrew defeated, and yet remained in the same perversity. Nor was the case of Felix of Aptunga neglected, but at the same emperor's command he too was cleared by proconsular records.

### Translation notes

- The Roman synod under Miltiades (Melchiades) in 313, the Council of Arles in 314, Constantine's judgement in 316, and the proconsular inquiry into Felix (315). 'Altar against altar' is Augustine's standing phrase for schism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.4 (CSEL 34.2:87–88; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-4).

## Letter 43.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:88
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls the reading, in one day, of the documents proving Caecilian's and Felix's innocence.

### Latin text

Sed quia haec omnia dicebamus tantum, non etiam legebamus, minus profecto uobis agere uidebamur, quam de nostra expectabatis instantia. quod ubi sensimus, ad ea, quae legenda promiseramus, non distulimus mittere. quae omnia, dum excurrimus ad ecclesiam Gelizitanam inde ad uestrum oppidum reuersuri, bidui non pleni intermissione uenerunt atque, ut nostis, quantum tempus admisit, uno die recitata sunt uobis: primo ubi Secundus Tigisitanus confessos traditores a collegio suo remouere non ausus est, cum quibus postea non confessum et absentem Caecilianum aliosque suos collegas damnare ausus est, deinde gesta proconsularia, ubi Felix diligentissimo examine probatus est innocens. haec ante meridiem uobis lecta esse meministis; post meridiem uero recitauimus preces eorum ad Constantinum datisque ab eo iudicibus gesta ecclesiastica in Romana urbe habita, quibus illi inprobati sunt, Caecilianus autem in episcopali honore firmatus, postremo Constantini imperatoris litteras, quibus omnia multo maxime testatissima claruerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But because we were only saying all this and not also reading it, we seemed to you to be doing less than you expected of our insistence. When we perceived this, we did not delay sending for the documents we had promised to read. All of them arrived during an interval of less than two days, while we went over to the church of Geliza, intending to return from there to your town; and, as you know, as far as time allowed, they were read to you in one day: first, the record where Secundus of Tigisis did not dare to remove from his body of colleagues confessed traitors, with whom he afterwards dared to condemn Caecilian and other colleagues of his, who had not confessed and were absent; then the proconsular records, where Felix was proved innocent after the most careful examination. You remember that these were read to you before noon. After noon we read their petitions to Constantine and the church records of the proceedings held in the city of Rome by the judges he appointed, in which they were condemned and Caecilian confirmed in his episcopal rank; lastly, the letter of the emperor Constantine, in which everything became clear with the fullest attestation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.5 (CSEL 34.2:88; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-5).

## Letter 43.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:88–89
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine presses the Donatists with the plain evidence and explains that Secundus pardoned the confessed traitors because he himself was suspected.

### Latin text

Quid uultis amplius, homines? quid uultis amplius? non de auro et argento uestro agitur; non terra, non praedia, non denique salus uestri corporis in discrimen uocatur: de adipiscenda uita aeterna et fugienda morte aeterna compellamus animas uestras. expergiscimini aliquando! non in aliqua obscura quaestione uersamur, non recondita secreta rimamur, quibus penetrandis uel nulla uel rara humana corda sufficiant. res in aperto est. quid eminet clarius? quid cernitur citius? dicimus temerario concilio quamlibet numerosissimo innocentes absentesque fuisse damnatos. probamus hoc proconsularibus gestis, quibus ab omni traditionis crimine alienus iudicatus est ille, quem maxime criminosum a uestris prolata concilii gesta sonuerunt. dicimus a traditoribus confessis in eos, qui traditores dicerentur, dictas fuisse sententias. probamus hoc ecclesiasticis gestis, ubi nominatim declarantur, in quibus Secundus Tigisitanus ea, quae cognouit, uelut contuitu pacis ignouit et, cum quibus postea non cognouit, discissa pace damnauit. unde apparuit eum etiam primo non paci consuluisse, sed sibi timuisse. obiecerat ei namque Purpurius Liniatensis, quod etiam ipse, cum detentus esset a curatore et ordine, ut scripturas traderet, dimissus est utique non frustra, nisi quia tradidit aut tradi aliquid iussit. hanc ille suspicionem satis probabilem metuens accepto consilio a minore Secundo consanguineo suo consultisque ceteris, qui cum eo erant, episcopis manifestissima crimina deo iudicanda dimisit atque ita paci prospexisse uisus est, quod falsum erat, cum sibi prospexerit.

### English translation (Claude)

What more do you want, men? What more do you want? It is not your gold and silver that is at stake; not land, not estates, not even the health of your body is put in danger. We are appealing to your souls about gaining eternal life and fleeing eternal death. Wake up at last! We are not dealing with some obscure question, nor probing hidden secrets which no human hearts, or few, are able to penetrate. The matter is in the open. What stands out more clearly? What is seen more quickly? We say that innocent and absent men were condemned by a rash council, however numerous. We prove this by the proconsular records, in which that man was judged free of every charge of handing over whom the records of the council produced by your side proclaimed the most guilty. We say that sentences were pronounced by confessed traitors against those who were called traitors. We prove this by church records, in which the names are declared of those in whose case Secundus of Tigisis pardoned, as if out of regard for peace, things he had investigated, and with whom he afterwards, breaking the peace, condemned men whose case he had not investigated. From this it became clear that even at first he did not consult for peace, but feared for himself. For Purpurius of Limata had charged him with the fact that he too, when he had been held by the curator and the town council to make him hand over the Scriptures, had been released, certainly not for nothing, unless because he had handed them over or ordered something to be handed over. Fearing this quite probable suspicion, he took advice from the younger Secundus, his kinsman, consulted the other bishops who were with him, and left the plainest crimes to God's judgement; and so he seemed to have looked to peace, which was false, since he looked to himself.

### Translation notes

- Purpurius of Limata was among the Numidian bishops at Cirta (305).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.6 (CSEL 34.2:88–89; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-6).

## Letter 43.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:89–90
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Caecilian, in communion with Rome and the churches overseas, could rightly refuse a suspect council, and Secundus should not have condemned him in absence.

### Latin text

Nam si in eius corde cogitatio pacis habitaret, non apud Carthaginem postea cum traditoribus, quos praesentes atque confessos deo dimiserat, damnaret crimine traditionis, quos absentes apud eum nemo conuicerat. tanto magis enim timere debuit, ne pax unitatis uiolaretur, quanto erat Carthago ciuitas ampla et inlustris, unde se per totum Africae corpus malum, quod ibi esset exortum, tamquam a uertice effunderet. erat etiam transmarinis uicina regionibus et fama celeberrima nobilis. unde non mediocris utique auctoritatis habebat episcopum, qui posset non curare conspirantem multitudinem inimicorum, cum se uideret et Romanae ecclesiae, in qua semper apostolicae cathedrae uiguit principatus, et ceteris terris, unde euangelium ad ipsam Africam uenit, per communicatorias litteras esse coniunctum, ubi paratum esset causam suam dicere, si aduersarii eius ab eo illas ecclesias alienare conarentur. quia ergo uenire noluit ad hospitium collegarum, quos a suis inimicis contra ueritatem suae causae peruersos esse sentiebat uel suspicabatur uel, ut ipsi adserunt, simulabat, tanto magis Secundus, si uerae pacis custos esse uoluisset, cauere debuit, ne damnarentur absentes, qui iudicio eorum omnino interesse noluerunt. neque enim de presbyteris aut diaconis aut inferioris ordinis clericis sed de collegis agebatur, qui possent aliorum collegarum iudicio praesertim apostolicarum ecclesiarum causam suam integram reseruare, ubi contra eos sententiae dictae in absentes nullo modo aliquid ualerent, quando eorum iudicium non primo aditum postea deseruerunt, sed suspectum semper habitum numquam adire uoluerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

For if the thought of peace dwelt in his heart, he would not afterwards at Carthage, with the traitors whom he had left to God when they were present and confessed, have condemned for the crime of handing over men whom no one had convicted before him in their absence. He ought to have feared the more that the peace of unity would be violated, the larger and more illustrious a city Carthage was, so that an evil arising there would pour itself out, as from a head, over the whole body of Africa. It was also near the lands overseas and renowned by widespread fame. Hence it certainly had a bishop of no slight authority, who could disregard the conspiring multitude of his enemies, since he saw himself joined by letters of communion both to the Roman church, in which the primacy of the apostolic chair has always flourished, and to the other lands from which the gospel came to Africa itself, where he was ready to plead his case if his adversaries tried to estrange those churches from him. Since, then, he was unwilling to come to the lodging of colleagues who he felt or suspected, or, as they themselves assert, pretended, had been turned against the truth of his case by his enemies, all the more ought Secundus, if he had wished to be a guardian of true peace, to have taken care that men should not be condemned in their absence who were wholly unwilling to attend their tribunal. For the matter concerned not presbyters or deacons or clergy of a lower order, but colleagues, who could reserve their case entire for the judgement of other colleagues, especially those of the apostolic churches, where sentences pronounced against them in their absence would be of no force at all, since they did not first approach their tribunal and afterwards desert it, but always held it suspect and never wished to approach it.

### Translation notes

- The phrase on the Roman church's 'primacy of the apostolic chair' is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.7 (CSEL 34.2:89–90; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-7).

## Letter 43.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:90–92
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine imagines the counsel Secundus should have given: leave the cases to God or bring them before the churches overseas, rather than create a schism.

### Latin text

Haec res maxime sollicitare debuit Secundum, qui tunc erat primas, si propterea concilium regebat, ut paci consuleret; facile enim fortassis rabida in absentem ora placata uel frenata comprimeret, si diceret: Videtis, fratres, post tantam stragem persecutionis misericordia dei a principibus saeculi pacem esse concessam; non debemus nos Christiani et episcopi unitatem disrumpere Christianam, quam iam paganus non insequitur inimicus. itaque aut istas omnes causas, quas clades turbulentissimi temporis inflixit ecclesiae, deo iudici dimittamus aut, si aliqui in uobis sunt, qui certa istorum crimina ita nouerint, ut ea facile ualeant edocere negantesque conuincere, et talibus communicare formidant, pergant ad fratres et collegas nostros transmarinarum ecclesiarum episcopos et ibi prius de istorum factis et contumacia conquerantur, quod ad iudicium collegarum Afrorum male sibi conscii uenire noluerunt, ut inde illis denuntietur, ut ueniant ibique obiectis respondeant. quod si non fecerint, ibi etiam eorum prauitas et peruersitas innotescet missaque tractatoria super eorum nomine per totum orbem terrarum, quacumque iam Christi ecclesia dilatata est, ab omnibus ecclesiis eorum communio praecidetur, ne aliquis error in cathedra ecclesiae Carthaginis oriatur. tum demum securi episcopum alium plebi Carthaginis ordinabimus, cum a tota ecclesia isti fuerint separati, ne forte, cum alius modo fuerit ordinatus, non ei communicetur ab ecclesia transmarina, quia iste ab honore depositus non uidebitur, quem iam ordinatum fama celebrauit et ad eum commeare communicatorias litteras fecit, atque ita magnum scandalum schismatis in unitate Christi iam pacatis temporibus oriatur, dum praepropere uolumus nostras praecipitare sententias, et non contra Caecilianum sed contra orbem terrarum, qui ei per ignorantiam communicat, altare alterum erigere audeamus.

### English translation (Claude)

This matter ought above all to have concerned Secundus, who was then primate, if he presided over the council in order to consult for peace. For perhaps he could easily have calmed or curbed the mouths raging against an absent man, had he said: 'You see, brothers, that after so great a slaughter of persecution, by the mercy of God, peace has been granted by the rulers of the world. We Christians and bishops ought not to break apart Christian unity, which the pagan enemy no longer persecutes. Therefore let us either leave to God as judge all these cases which the disaster of a most turbulent time has inflicted on the church; or, if there are some among you who know the crimes of these men so certainly that they can easily prove them and convict them if they deny them, and who dread communion with such men, let them go to our brothers and colleagues, the bishops of the churches overseas, and there first complain of their deeds and contumacy, that, conscious of guilt, they refused to come to the judgement of their African colleagues; so that from there they may be summoned to come and answer the charges there. If they do not, their depravity and perversity will become known there too, and when a circular letter has been sent concerning their names through the whole world, wherever the church of Christ has now spread, their communion will be cut off by all the churches, lest any error arise in the chair of the church of Carthage. Then at last we shall safely ordain another bishop for the people of Carthage, when these men have been separated from the whole church; lest perhaps, if another is ordained now, the church overseas should not communicate with him, because this man will not be seen to have been deposed from his rank, whose ordination report has already made famous and has caused letters of communion to pass to him; and so a great scandal of schism arise in the unity of Christ in times now peaceful, while we are in too great haste to rush out our sentences, and dare to raise another altar not against Caecilian but against the whole world, which communicates with him in ignorance.'

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.8 (CSEL 34.2:90–92; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-8).

## Letter 43.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:92
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Donatists avoided bringing their charges overseas because they could not prove them there.

### Latin text

Huic tam sano rectoque consilio quisquis infrenis obtemperare noluisset, quid esset facturus aut quo modo aliquem absentium collegarum esset damnaturus, cum in potestate acta concilii non haberet contradicente primate? quod si tanta et aduersus primam sedem seditio nasceretur, ut nonnulli damnare iam uellent, quos uolebat ille differri, quanto melius a talibus inquieta et inpacata molientibus quam a totius orbis communione dissentiretur! sed quia non erant, quae in Caecilianum et ordinatores eius transmarino iudicio probarentur, propterea nec, priusquam in eum sententias dicerent, differre noluerunt nec, postea quam dixerunt, perseueranter id agere, ut ecclesiae transmarinae in notitiam perferretur, quorum traditorum in Africa damnatorum communionem uitare deberent, quia, si id facere temptauissent, adessent sibi Caecilianus et ceteri et suam causam aduersus fallaces criminatores apud transmarinos ecclesiasticos iudices diligentissima discussione purgarent.

### English translation (Claude)

If any unbridled man had refused to obey such sound and right counsel, what could he have done, or how could he have condemned any of his absent colleagues, when he did not have the acts of the council in his power, with the primate opposing? And if so great a sedition arose even against the first see that some wished to condemn at once those whom he wished to be deferred, how much better it would have been to dissent from such men, who were plotting restless and unpeaceful things, than from the communion of the whole world! But because there was nothing that could be proved against Caecilian and his ordainers before a tribunal overseas, they were unwilling either to defer before pronouncing sentence on him, or, after they had pronounced it, to work persistently to bring to the knowledge of the churches overseas the names of the traitors condemned in Africa whose communion they ought to avoid; because, if they had tried to do so, Caecilian and the others would have been present and would have cleared their case against the deceitful accusers before the church judges overseas by a most careful inquiry.

### Translation notes

- 'The first see' here means the Numidian primacy.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.9 (CSEL 34.2:92; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-9).

## Letter 43.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:92–93
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the confessed traitors condemned Caecilian to deflect suspicion from themselves.

### Latin text

Itaque consilium illud peruersum atque nefarium maxime, ut creditur, traditorum fuit, quibus confessis Secundus Tigisitanus ignouerat, ut, quoniam de traditione fama crebruerat, infamatis aliis a se auerterent suspicionem et, cum homines per Africam totam credentes episcopis falsa de innocentibus loquerentur, quod damnati essent apud Carthaginem traditores, tamquam in nebula mendacissimi rumoris ipsi, qui uere tradiderant, latitarent. unde uidetis, carissimi, fieri potuisse, quod uerisimile non esse quidam uestrum dicebant, ut, qui essent de sua traditione confessi causamque suam impetrauissent deo dimitti oportere, idem iudices damnatoresque tamquam traditorum absentium postea consedissent. magis enim amplexi sunt occasionem, qua possent alios falsa criminatione perfundere et conuersas in eos linguas hominum inquisitione criminum suorum hoc modo declinare. alioquin, si fieri non posset, ut quisque mala, quae ipse committeret, in alio iudicaret, non diceret quibusdam Paulus apostolus: Propterea inexcusabilis es, o homo, qui iudicas. in quo enim alium iudicas, temet ipsum condemnas; eadem enim agis, quae iudicas. quod illi omnino fecerunt, ut haec uerba apostolica integre in eos apteque conueniant.

### English translation (Claude)

And so that perverse and wicked plan was chiefly, it is believed, that of the traitors whom Secundus of Tigisis had pardoned when they confessed: since rumour about handing over had spread widely, by defaming others they might turn suspicion away from themselves; and while men throughout Africa, believing the bishops, said false things about innocent men, that traitors had been condemned at Carthage, those who had truly handed over might hide as in the fog of a most lying rumour. From this you see, dearly beloved, that what some of you said was not likely could happen: that those who had confessed their handing over and had obtained the decision that their case should be left to God afterwards sat as judges and condemners of absent men as traitors. For they the more eagerly seized an opportunity by which they could cover others with false accusation and in this way, when men's tongues were turned against those others, avoid inquiry into their own crimes. Otherwise, if it were impossible for anyone to judge in another the evils he himself committed, the apostle Paul would not say to certain people: 'Therefore you are without excuse, O man, whoever you are who judge; for in judging another you condemn yourself, for you do the same things that you judge.' This they did entirely, so that these apostolic words fit them fully and aptly.

### Scripture references

- Rom 2:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Rom 2:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.10 (CSEL 34.2:92–93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-10).

## Letter 43.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:93–94
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that condemning absent men without a hearing, while pardoning confessed traitors, was unjust, citing Sirach on inquiry before blame.

### Latin text

Non ergo tunc Secundus, quando eorum crimina deo dimisit, paci unitatique consuluit; alioquin magis hoc apud Carthaginem prouideret, ne schisma fieret, ubi nullus aderat, cui confesso crimen donare cogeretur, sed, quod erat facillimum, tota conseruatio pacis esset absentes nolle damnare. itaque iniuriam facerent innocentibus, etiam si eis non conuictis neque confessis neque omnino praesentibus ignoscere uoluissent. ille quippe accipit ueniam, cuius culpa certissima est. quanto ergo immaniores et caeciores fuerunt, qui ea se putauerunt posse damnare, quae incognita nec donare potuissent! sed illic cognita dimissa sunt deo, ne alia quaererentur; hic incognita damnata sunt, ut illa tegerentur. sed dicet aliquis: (Cognouerunt.) quod etsi concedam, etiam sic absentibus utique parci oportebat. neque enim iudicium deseruerant, ubi numquam omnino constiterant, nec in illis solis episcopis Afris erat ecclesia, ut omne iudicium ecclesiasticum uitasse uiderentur, qui se iudicio eorum praesentare noluissent. milia quippe collegarum transmarina restabant, ubi apparebat eos iudicari posse, qui uidebantur Afros uel Numidas collegas habere suspectos. ubi est enim, quod scriptura clamat: Antequam interroges, ne uituperes quemquam et, cum interrogaueris, corripe iuste? si ergo nec uituperari nec corripi nisi interrogatum spiritus sanctus uoluit, quanto sceleratius non uituperati aut correpti, sed omnino damnati sunt, qui de suis criminibus nihil absentes interrogari potuerunt!

### English translation (Claude)

So Secundus did not consult for peace and unity when he left their crimes to God; otherwise he would rather have taken care at Carthage that no schism should arise, where there was no one present whose confessed crime he was compelled to pardon, but where, what was easiest of all, the whole preservation of peace lay in refusing to condemn absent men. Indeed they would have done the innocent a wrong even if they had chosen to pardon them when they were neither convicted nor confessed nor present at all; for he receives pardon whose guilt is most certain. How much more monstrous and blind, then, were those who thought they could condemn what, without investigation, they could not even have pardoned! There, things investigated were left to God so that other things might not be inquired into; here, things uninvestigated were condemned so that those might be covered. But someone will say: 'They did investigate.' Even if I grant this, even so the absent ought certainly to have been spared. For they had not deserted a tribunal before which they had never stood at all; nor was the church to be found in those African bishops alone, so that those who refused to present themselves to their judgement should seem to have avoided all church judgement. Thousands of colleagues remained overseas, where it was evident that those could be judged who seemed to hold their African or Numidian colleagues suspect. For where is what Scripture cries out: 'Before you inquire, blame no one; and when you have inquired, rebuke justly'? If, then, the Holy Spirit willed that no one be blamed or rebuked unless he had been questioned, how much more wickedly were those not blamed or rebuked but wholly condemned, who, being absent, could not be questioned about their crimes at all!

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 11:7 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotation is Sir 11:7, cited by Augustine as Scripture spoken by the Holy Spirit.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.11 (CSEL 34.2:93–94; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/39-1/#p-43-11).

## Letter 43.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:94–95
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that since Felix, the most fiercely accused, was proved innocent, the others condemned with him should be presumed innocent too.

### Latin text

Sed tamen isti, qui licet absentium et nequaquam iudicium deserentium, quia numquam adfuerunt et semper sibi cuneum illum suspectum esse declarauerunt, tamen cognita crimina damnasse dicunt, quaeso uos, fratres mei, quo modo cognouerunt? respondetis: Nescimus, quando quidem ipsa cognitio in illis gestis explicata non est. sed ego uobis ostendam, quo modo cognouerunt. adtendite causam Felicis Aptungitani et primo legite, quam uehementiores in eum fuerunt. sic ergo et ceterorum causam nouerant, sicut huius, qui postea innocentissimus diligenti et terribili inquisitione probatus est. quanto itaque iustius et tutius et citius innocentes eos existimare debemus, quorum crimina ab istis leuius accusata sunt et parciore reprehensione damnata, quando ille inuentus est innocens, in quem multo immanius saeuierunt!

### English translation (Claude)

But these men, who say that they condemned crimes that had been investigated, though the men were absent and in no way deserting the tribunal, since they had never appeared and had always declared that faction suspect, I ask you, my brothers, how did they investigate them? You answer: 'We do not know, since the investigation itself is not set out in those records.' But I will show you how they investigated. Consider the case of Felix of Aptunga, and first read how much more vehement they were against him. So, then, they knew the case of the others just as they knew the case of this man, who was afterwards proved most innocent by a careful and fearful inquiry. How much more justly, safely, and quickly, then, ought we to consider those men innocent whose crimes they accused more lightly and condemned with more sparing censure, when that man was found innocent against whom they raged far more savagely!

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.12 (CSEL 34.2:94–95; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-12).

## Letter 43.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:95–96
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the objection that a bishop should not have been cleared by a civil court: the Donatists themselves appealed to the emperor.

### Latin text

An forte, sicut quidam dixit, quod quidem cum uobis diceretur, displicuit, sed tamen praetermittendum non est, — ait enim quidam: Non debuit episcopus proconsulari iudicio purgari. quasi uero ipse sibi hoc comparauerit ac non imperator ita quaeri iusserit, ad cuius curam, de qua rationem deo redditurus esset, res illa maxime pertinebat. arbitrum enim et iudicem causae traditionis et schismatis illi eum fecerant, qui ad eum etiam preces miserant, ad quem postea prouocarunt et tamen iudicio eius adquiescere noluerunt. itaque si culpandus est, quem iudex terrenus absoluit, cum ipse sibi hoc non poposcisset, quanto magis culpandi sunt, qui terrenum regem suae causae iudicem esse uoluerunt! si autem criminis non est prouocare ad imperatorem, non est criminis audiri ab imperatore, ergo nec ab illo, cui causam delegauerit imperator. quendam etiam suspensum eculeo in causa Felicis episcopi amicus ille uoluit criminari, ut quis etiam ungulis uexaretur. numquid poterat Felix contradicere, ne tanta diligentia uel seueritate quaereretur, cum eius causam inueniendam cognitor agitaret? quid enim erat aliud nolle sic quaeri quam de crimine confiteri? et tamen ille ipse pro consule inter praeconum terribiles uoces et cruentas carnificum manus numquam collegam damnaret absentem, qui iudicio eius se praesentare noluisset, cum haberet aliud, quod posset audiri, aut si damnaret, certe etiam ipsis saecularibus legibus poenas iustas et debitas lueret.

### English translation (Claude)

Or perhaps, as someone said (and though it displeased you when it was said to you, it must not be passed over), someone said: 'A bishop ought not to have been cleared by a proconsular court.' As if he had procured this for himself, and the emperor had not ordered the inquiry to be made, to whose charge, for which he would render account to God, that matter chiefly belonged! For they had made him arbiter and judge of the case of handing over and of the schism, who had even sent petitions to him, to whom they afterwards appealed, and whose judgement they nevertheless refused to accept. So if he is to be blamed whom an earthly judge acquitted, though he had not asked this for himself, how much more are they to be blamed who wished an earthly king to be the judge of their case! But if it is no crime to appeal to the emperor, it is no crime to be heard by the emperor, and so neither by one to whom the emperor has delegated the case. That friend of yours also wished to make a charge of the fact that, in the case of bishop Felix, a certain man was hung on the rack, and even torn with the hooks. Could Felix object to the inquiry being made with such diligence or severity, when the judge was pressing the investigation of his case? For what else would refusing such an inquiry be than confessing the crime? And yet that very proconsul, amid the fearful cries of the heralds and the bloody hands of the executioners, would never have condemned an absent colleague who had refused to present himself at his tribunal, if he had another court in which he could be heard; or if he had condemned him, he would surely have paid just and due penalties even under the secular laws themselves.

### Translation notes

- The torture of a witness (the rack and hooks) is described as in Roman judicial procedure.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.13 (CSEL 34.2:95–96; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-13).

## Letter 43.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:96–97
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Roman synod under Miltiades rightly judged the case at the emperor's request and found nothing against Caecilian.

### Latin text

Quod si gesta proconsularia displicent, ecclesiasticis cedite. omnia uobis ordine recitata sunt. an forte non debuit Romanae ecclesiae Melchiades episcopus cum collegis transmarinis episcopis illud sibi usurpare iudicium, quod ab Afris septuaginta, ubi primas Tigisitanus praesedit, fuerat terminatum? quid, quod nec ipse usurpauit? rogatus quippe imperator iudices misit episcopos, qui cum eo sederent et de tota illa causa, quod iustum uideretur, statuerent. hoc probamus et Donatistarum precibus et uerbis ipsius imperatoris; utraque enim uobis lecta meministis et inspiciendi ac describendi licentiam nunc habetis. legite et considerate omnia. uidete, quanta cura pacis atque unitatis conseruandae uel restituendae cuncta discussa sint, quem ad modum accusatorum persona tractata et quorundam eorum quibus maculis inprobata sit praesentiumque uocibus liquido constiterit nihil eos habuisse, quod in Caecilianum dicerent, sed totam causam in plebem de parte Maiorini, hoc est seditiosam et ab ecclesiae pace alienatam multitudinem transferre uoluisse, ut ab ea uidelicet turba Caecilianus accusaretur, quam solis tumultuosis clamoribus nulla documentorum adtestatione, nullo ueritatis examine ad suam uoluntatem animos iudicum detorquere posse arbitrabantur, nisi forte furiosa et poculo erroris atque corruptionis ebria multitudo uera in Caecilianum crimina diceret ubi septuaginta episcopi, sicut de Felice Aptungitano constitit, absentes et innocentes collegas tam insana temeritate damnarunt. quali enim turbae illi consenserant, ut aduersus innocentes non interrogatos proferrent sententias, a tali turba etiam rursus accusari Caecilianum uolebant. sed plane tales inuenerant iudices, quibus illam dementiam persuaderent!

### English translation (Claude)

If the proconsular records displease you, yield to the church records. All were read to you in order. Or perhaps Miltiades, bishop of the Roman church, with his colleagues the bishops overseas, ought not to have claimed for himself the judgement which had been settled by the seventy Africans over whom the primate of Tigisis presided? What if he did not even claim it? For the emperor, being asked, sent bishops as judges to sit with him and decide what seemed just about that whole case. We prove this both by the petitions of the Donatists and by the words of the emperor himself; for you remember that both were read to you, and you now have permission to inspect and copy them. Read and consider everything. See with what care for preserving or restoring peace and unity everything was discussed; how the character of the accusers was dealt with, and by what stains some of them were discredited; and how it became clear from the words of those present that they had nothing to say against Caecilian, but wished to transfer the whole case to the people of Majorinus's party, that is, a seditious multitude estranged from the peace of the church; so that Caecilian might be accused by that crowd, which they thought could bend the minds of the judges to their will by tumultuous shouting alone, with no attestation of documents and no examination of the truth; unless perhaps a furious multitude, drunk with the cup of error and corruption, would speak true charges against Caecilian, where seventy bishops, as was established in the case of Felix of Aptunga, condemned absent and innocent colleagues with such mad rashness. For they wished Caecilian to be accused again by the same kind of crowd as the one they had gone along with in pronouncing sentence against innocent men who had not been questioned. But plainly they had found judges whom they could persuade of that madness!

### Translation notes

- The last sentence is ironic: the judges at Rome were not persuaded.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.14 (CSEL 34.2:96–97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-14).

## Letter 43.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:97
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how at Rome the Donatists failed to produce accusers and Donatus withdrew, while a further accusation against Caecilian came to nothing.

### Latin text

Potestis enim pro uestra prudentia et illorum peruersitatem illic adtendere et iudicum grauitatem, quem ad modum ad extremum persuadere non possent, ut a plebe partis Maiorini, quae certam personam non habebat, argueretur Caecilianus et requisiti ab eis essent uel accusatores uel testes uel quoquo modo causae necessarii, qui simul cum eis ex Africa uenerant, et eos praesentes fuisse atque a Donato subtractos esse diceretur. promisit idem Donatus, quod eos esset exhibiturus. quod cum non semel sed saepius promisisset, amplius ad illud iudicium accedere noluit, ubi iam erat tanta confessus, ut nihil aliud deinceps non accedendo nisi praesens damnari noluisse uideretur, cum tamen ea, quae damnanda essent, eo praesente atque interrogato manifestata fuerint. accessit aliud, ut a quibusdam aduersus Caecilianum denuntiationis libellus daretur. post quod factum quem ad modum sit rursus agitata cognitio et quae personae illum libellum dederint quoque modo nihil in Caecilianum probari potuerit, quid dicam, cum et audieritis omnia et, quotiens uolueritis, legere possitis?

### English translation (Claude)

For your prudence enables you to observe there both their perversity and the seriousness of the judges: how in the end they could not persuade them that Caecilian should be accused by the people of Majorinus's party, which had no definite legal standing; how they were asked for the accusers or witnesses, or those in any way necessary to the case, who had come with them from Africa, and how it was said that these had been present and had been withdrawn by Donatus. The same Donatus promised that he would produce them. When he had promised this not once but repeatedly, he refused to come before that tribunal any more, where he had already confessed so much that by not coming thereafter he seemed only to wish not to be condemned in person, although the things that deserved condemnation had been made plain while he was present and questioned. Something else was added: a written accusation against Caecilian was handed in by certain people. How after this the inquiry was opened again, what persons handed in that document, and how nothing could be proved against Caecilian, why should I say, since you have heard everything and can read it as often as you like?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.15 (CSEL 34.2:97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-15).

## Letter 43.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:97–98
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Miltiades's peaceable sentence, which blamed Donatus alone and offered to recognize bishops ordained by Majorinus, over the rash council of seventy.

### Latin text

De numero autem septuaginta episcoporum cum quasi grauissima opponeretur auctoritas, quae fuerint dicta, meministis. et tamen uiri grauissimi ab infinitis quaestionibus catena quadam inexplicabili sese nectentibus suum temperare arbitrium maluerunt nequaquam curantes, quam multi essent illi episcopi aut unde collecti, quos uidebant tanta temeritate caecatos, ut in absentes et non interrogatos collegas tam praecipites auderent proferre sententias. et tamen qualis ipsius beati Melchiadis ultima est prolata sententia! quam innocens, quam integra, quam prouida atque pacifica! qua neque collegas, in quibus nihil constiterat, de collegio suo ausus est remouere et Donato solo, quem totius mali principem inuenerat, maxime culpato sanitatis recuperandae optionem ceteris liberam fecit paratus communicatorias litteras mittere etiam his, quos a Maiorino ordinatos esse constaret, ita ut, quibuscumque locis duo essent episcopi, quos dissensio geminasset, eum confirmari uellet, qui fuisset ordinatus prior, alteri autem eorum plebs alia regenda prouideretur. o uirum optimum! o filium Christianae pacis et patrem Christianae plebis! conferte nunc istam paucitatem cum illa multitudine episcoporum neque numerum numero sed pondus ponderi comparate: hinc modestiam, inde temeritatem; hinc uigilantiam, inde caecitatem; hic nec mansuetudo integritatem corrupit nec integritas mansuetudini repugnauit, ibi autem et furore timor tegebatur et timore furor incitabatur; isti enim conuenerant cognitione uerorum criminum falsa respuere, illi falsorum damnatione uera celare.

### English translation (Claude)

You remember what was said when the number of seventy bishops was set against us as though it were a most weighty authority. And yet those most serious men preferred to restrain their judgement from endless questions binding one another in an inextricable chain, not at all concerned how many those bishops were or where they had been gathered from, whom they saw blinded by such rashness as to dare to pronounce such headlong sentences against absent colleagues who had not been questioned. And yet what a final sentence the blessed Miltiades himself pronounced! How innocent, how upright, how far-seeing and peaceable! By it he neither dared to remove from his body of colleagues those against whom nothing had been established, and, laying the chief blame on Donatus alone, whom he had found to be the author of the whole evil, he left the rest free to choose to recover their soundness, ready to send letters of communion even to those who were shown to have been ordained by Majorinus; so that, in whatever places there were two bishops whom dissension had doubled, he wished the one who had been ordained first to be confirmed, and another people to be provided for the other of them to govern. O excellent man! O son of Christian peace and father of the Christian people! Now compare that small number with that multitude of bishops, and weigh not number against number but weight against weight: here moderation, there rashness; here watchfulness, there blindness. Here gentleness did not corrupt integrity, nor did integrity fight against gentleness; there, fear was covered by fury and fury stirred up by fear. For these had met to reject false charges by investigating the true; those, to hide true crimes by condemning false ones.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.16 (CSEL 34.2:97–98; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-16).

## Letter 43.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:98–100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the council against Caecilian was driven by a few guilty bishops and by the money of Lucilla, whom Caecilian had once rebuked.

### Latin text

Illisne se tandem Caecilianus audiendum iudicandumque committeret, cum haberet tales, apud quos, si ei causa moueretur, innocentiam suam facillime ostenderet? non se illis omnino committeret nec, si peregrinus ecclesiae Carthaginiensis subito esset episcopus ordinatus et ignoraret, quid ad corrumpendos animos uel inproborum uel inperitorum posset tunc pecuniosissima mulier Lucilla quaedam, quam pro disciplina ecclesiastica corripiendo idem, cum esset diaconus, laeserat. etiam hoc enim accesserat malum ad illam perficiendam iniquitatem. nam in illo concilio, ubi a confessis traditoribus absentes atque innocentes damnati sunt, pauci quidam erant, qui crimina sua infamatis aliis tegere cupiebant, ut homines a ueritatis inquisitione auerterentur falsis rumoribus auocati. pauci ergo erant, qui hoc negotium maxime curabant, quamuis in eis esset maior auctoritas propter ipsius Secundi societatem, qui eis pepercerat territus. ceteri autem Lucillae pecunia maxime aduersus Caecilianum empti et instigati perhibentur. extant gesta apud Zenophilum consularem, ubi Nundinarius quidam diaconus a Siluano Cirtensi episcopo, quantum ipsis gestis intellegitur, degradatus cum eis satisfacere per aliorum episcoporum litteras frustra conatus esset, multa patefecit iratus et in iudicium publicum protulit. inter quae id quoque commemoratum legitur, quod Lucillae pecunia corruptis episcopis in Carthaginiensi ecclesia, in Africae capite, altare contra altare leuatum est. scio, quod haec gesta uobis non legerimus, sed tempus non fuisse meministis. inerat etiam nonnullus dolor animi de typho superbiae ueniens, quod non ipsi ordinauerant Carthagini episcopum.

### English translation (Claude)

Was Caecilian, then, to commit himself to be heard and judged by those men, when he had others before whom, if a case were brought against him, he could very easily show his innocence? He would not commit himself to them at all, not even if he had been a stranger suddenly ordained bishop of the church of Carthage and did not know what a certain Lucilla, then a very wealthy woman, could do to corrupt the minds of the wicked or the ignorant; whom he had offended, when he was a deacon, by rebuking her for the sake of church discipline. For this evil too had been added to bring that iniquity to completion. In that council, where absent and innocent men were condemned by confessed traitors, there were a few who wished to cover their own crimes by defaming others, so that men, distracted by false rumours, might be turned away from inquiring into the truth. So there were few who chiefly managed this business, though they had greater authority because of their partnership with Secundus himself, who had spared them out of fear. The rest are said to have been bought and stirred up against Caecilian chiefly by Lucilla's money. There are extant the records of proceedings before Zenophilus the consular, where a certain Nundinarius, a deacon, who, as far as can be understood from the records themselves, had been degraded by Silvanus, bishop of Cirta, and had tried in vain to make satisfaction to them through letters of other bishops, in his anger disclosed much and brought it before a public court. Among other things it is recorded there that, when bishops had been corrupted by Lucilla's money, altar was raised against altar in the church of Carthage, the capital of Africa. I know that we did not read these records to you, but you remember there was no time. There was also some resentment, arising from swollen pride, that they themselves had not ordained the bishop of Carthage.

### Translation notes

- The proceedings before Zenophilus (320) are the Gesta apud Zenophilum.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.17 (CSEL 34.2:98–100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-17).

## Letter 43.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends Caecilian's refusal to appear before the hostile council and notes that the Donatists went overseas only too late.

### Latin text

Quibus omnibus rebus cum eos non ueros iudices sed inimicos atque corruptos Caecilianus conuenisse cognosceret, quando fieri posset, ut uel ipse uellet uel populus, cui praesidebat, permitteret, ut relicta ecclesia iret in domum priuatam non collegarum discutiendus examine sed factionis cuneo et odiis muliebribus trucidandus, cum sibi praesertim uideret apud ecclesiam transmarinam priuatis inimicitiis et ab utraque parte dissensionis alienam incorruptum et integrum examen suae causae remanere? ubi si nihil aduersarii agere uellent, ipsi se ab orbis terrarum innocentissima communione praeciderent; si autem illic eum accusare temptassent, tunc sibi adesset, tunc innocentiam suam aduersus eorum machinamenta defenderet, sicut postea factum esse didicistis, cum tamen illi nimis sero quaesissent iudicium transmarinum iam schismatis rei, iam leuati altaris horrendo scelere maculati. primo enim facerent, si ueritate niterentur; sed falsis rumoribus temporis diuturnitate firmatis quasi uetusta fama praeiudicante ad iudicium uenire uoluerunt aut, quod magis credendum est, damnato prius, sicut libuit, Caeciliano quasi securi sibi uidebantur praefidentes numero suo nec audentes alibi commouere causam tam malam, ubi nulla corruptione operante posset ueritas inueniri.

### English translation (Claude)

When Caecilian knew from all these things that they had assembled not as true judges but as enemies and corrupt men, how could it happen that he would either wish, or the people over whom he presided would allow, that he should leave the church and go into a private house, not to be examined by the scrutiny of colleagues but to be butchered by a faction's wedge and a woman's hatred, especially when he saw that an uncorrupted and impartial examination of his case remained for him before the church overseas, which was free from private enmities and from both sides of the dissension? If his adversaries chose to do nothing there, they would cut themselves off from the most innocent communion of the whole world; but if they tried to accuse him there, then he would be present, then he would defend his innocence against their schemes, as you have learned was afterwards done, although they sought the judgement overseas far too late, when they were already guilty of schism and stained with the horrid crime of a raised altar. For they would have done it first if they relied on the truth; but they wished to come to judgement when false rumours had been confirmed by length of time, as though an old report would prejudge the case; or, what is more to be believed, having first condemned Caecilian as they pleased, they seemed to themselves secure, trusting in their numbers and not daring to raise so bad a case elsewhere, where, with no corruption at work, the truth could be found.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.18 (CSEL 34.2:100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-18).

## Letter 43.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:100–101
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Donatists appealed overseas only to have an excuse, and that if they distrusted the Roman judges, a plenary council remained open to them.

### Latin text

Sed postea quam ipsis rebus experti sunt cum Caeciliano permanere communionem orbis terrarum et ad eum a transmarinis ecclesiis communicatorias litteras mitti, non ad illum, quem ipsi scelerate ordinauerant, puduit eos semper tacere, quia posset eis obici, cur paterentur ignaram per tot gentes ecclesiam communicare damnatis et cur se ipsi ab innocentis orbis terrarum communione praeciderent, cum tacendo sinerent episcopo, quem Carthaginiensibus ordinassent, a toto orbe non communicari. elegerunt, sicut dicitur, ad duas agere causam cum Caeciliano apud ecclesias transmarinas parati ad utrumque, ut, si eum potuissent quacumque uersutia falsae criminationis euincere, satiarent plenissime cupiditatem suam, si autem non possent, in eadem quidem peruersitate durarent, sed iam tamen quasi haberent, quod dicerent, malos iudices se esse perpessos, quae uox est omnium malorum litigatorum, cum fuerint etiam manifestissima ueritate superati, quasi non eis ad hoc dici possit et iustissime dici: Ecce putemus illos episcopos, qui Romae iudicarunt, non bonos iudices fuisse? restabat adhuc plenarium ecclesiae uniuersae concilium, ubi etiam cum ipsis iudicibus causa posset agitari, ut, si male iudicasse conuicti essent, eorum sententiae soluerentur. quod utrum fecerint, probent; nos enim non esse factum facile probamus ex eo, quod totus orbis non eis communicat; aut, si factum est, etiam ibi sunt uicti, quod ipsa eorum separatio manifestat.

### English translation (Claude)

But after they had learned by experience that the communion of the whole world remained with Caecilian, and that letters of communion were sent to him from the churches overseas, and not to the man whom they had wickedly ordained, they were ashamed to keep silent for ever, because it could be objected to them: why did they allow the church throughout so many nations to communicate in ignorance with condemned men, and why did they cut themselves off from the communion of an innocent world, when by their silence they allowed the bishop they had ordained for the Carthaginians to be out of communion with the whole world? They chose, as is said, to plead their case against Caecilian before the churches overseas, ready for either outcome: if by any cunning of false accusation they could defeat him, they would most fully satisfy their desire; and if they could not, they would persist in the same perversity, but now as if they had something to say, namely that they had suffered bad judges, which is the cry of all bad litigants even when they have been overcome by the plainest truth; as if it could not be said to them, and most justly said: 'Suppose, then, that those bishops who judged at Rome were not good judges.' There still remained a plenary council of the whole church, where the case could be argued even with those judges themselves, so that if they were convicted of having judged badly, their sentences might be annulled. Whether they did this, let them prove; for we easily prove that it was not done, from the fact that the whole world does not communicate with them; or, if it was done, they were defeated there too, as their very separation shows.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.19 (CSEL 34.2:100–101; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-19).

## Letter 43.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:101–102
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts the Donatists' appeal from the Council of Arles to Constantine and the emperor's judgement at Milan in Caecilian's favour.

### Latin text

Sed tamen quid postea fecerint, imperatoris litteris sufficientissime ostenditur. iudices enim ecclesiasticos tantae auctoritatis episcopos, quorum iudicio et Caeciliani innocentia et eorum inprobitas declarata est, non apud alios collegas sed apud imperatorem accusare ausi sunt, quod male iudicarint. dedit ille aliud Arelatense iudicium aliorum scilicet episcoporum, non quia iam necesse erat, sed eorum peruersitatibus cedens et omni modo cupiens tantam inpudentiam cohibere. neque enim ausus est Christianus imperator sic eorum tumultuosas et fallaces querelas suscipere, ut de iudicio episcoporum, qui Romae sederant, ipse iudicaret, sed alios, ut dixi, episcopos dedit. a quibus tamen illi ad ipsum rursum imperatorem prouocare maluerunt. qua in re illos quem ad modum detestetur, audistis. atque utinam saltem ipsius iudicio insanissimis animositatibus suis finem posuissent atque, ut eis ipse cessit, ut de illa causa post episcopos iudicaret a sanctis antistitibus postea ueniam petiturus, dum tamen illi, quod ulterius dicerent, non haberent, si eius sententiae non obtemperarent, ad quem ipsi prouocauerunt, sic et illi aliquando cederent ueritati! iussit enim ille, ut ei partes ad agendam causam Romam occurrerent. quo cum Caecilianus nescio qua causa non occurrisset, interpellatus ab eis praecepit, ut Mediolanium sequerentur. tunc se aliqui eorum subtrahere coeperant fortasse indignati, quia non est eos imitatus Constantinus, ut iam statim atque uelociter Caecilianum damnaret absentem. quod ubi cognouit prouidus imperator, reliquos ab officialibus custoditos fecit Mediolanium peruenire. quo cum etiam Caecilianus uenisset, ipsum quoque, sicut scripsit, exhibuit cognitaque causa qua diligentia, qua cautela, qua prouisione, sicut eius indicant litterae, Caecilianum innocentissimum, illos inprobissimos iudicauit.

### English translation (Claude)

But what they did afterwards is shown most fully by the emperor's letter. For they dared to accuse the church judges, bishops of such authority, by whose judgement both Caecilian's innocence and their own wickedness had been declared, not before other colleagues but before the emperor, of having judged badly. He granted another trial at Arles, by other bishops, not because it was now necessary but yielding to their perversity and wishing by every means to restrain such impudence. For the Christian emperor did not dare to take up their noisy and deceitful complaints in such a way as to judge himself concerning the judgement of the bishops who had sat at Rome; but he gave other bishops, as I said. From them, however, they preferred to appeal once more to the emperor himself; and you have heard how he detests them for it. And would that at least by his judgement they had put an end to their insane animosities; and that, just as he yielded to them so far as to judge that case after the bishops, intending afterwards to ask pardon of the holy prelates, provided only that they would have nothing further to say if they did not obey the sentence of the one to whom they themselves had appealed, so they too would at last yield to the truth! For he ordered the parties to meet him at Rome to plead the case. When Caecilian, for some reason I do not know, did not appear there, the emperor, appealed to by them, ordered them to follow him to Milan. Then some of them began to slip away, perhaps indignant that Constantine had not imitated them by condemning Caecilian at once and quickly in his absence. When the far-seeing emperor learned this, he had the rest brought to Milan under guard of his officers. When Caecilian too had come there, he produced him also, as he wrote; and having heard the case, with what diligence, caution, and foresight his letter shows, he judged Caecilian wholly innocent and them wholly wicked.

### Translation notes

- The emperor's judgement at Milan was in 316.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.20 (CSEL 34.2:101–102; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-20).

## Letter 43.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:102–103
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine charges the Donatists with schism and rebaptism and argues that tolerating the wicked in the church for the sake of unity does not defile the good.

### Latin text

Et adhuc baptizant extra ecclesiam et, si possint, rebaptizant ecclesiam; sacrificant in dissensione et schismate et pacis nomine populos salutant, quos a pace salutis exterminant. conscinditur unitas Christi, blasphematur hereditas Christi, exsufflatur baptisma Christi et nolunt in se ista per ordinarias humanas potestates flagellis temporalibus emendari, ne in aeternas poenas pro tantis sacrilegiis destinentur. nos eis obicimus furorem schismatis, rebaptizationis insaniam, ab hereditate Christi, quae per omnes gentes diffusa est, nefariam separationem. de codicibus non tantum nostris sed etiam eorum recitamus ecclesias, quarum nomina hodie legunt et quibus hodie non communicant. quae cum recitantur in conuenticulis eorum, lectoribus suis dicunt: Pax tecum, et cum ipsis plebibus, quibus illae litterae scriptae sunt, pacem non habent. et ipsi nobis obiciunt uel falsa crimina mortuorum uel etiam si uera tamen aliena non intellegentes in his, quae nos eis obicimus, omnes illos teneri, in his uero, quae nobis obiciunt, paleam uel zizania messis dominicae reprehendi, ad frumenta autem crimen non pertinere neque considerantes, quia, quibus mali placent in unitate, ipsi communicant malis, quibus autem displicent et eos emendare non possunt neque ante tempus messis audent zizania eradicare, ne simul eradicent et triticum, non factis eorum sed altari Christi communicant, ita ut non solum non ab eis maculentur, sed etiam diuinis uerbis laudari praedicarique mereantur, quoniam, ne nomen Christi per horribilia schismata blasphemetur, pro bono unitatis tolerant, quod pro bono aequitatis oderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

And still they baptize outside the church and, if they can, rebaptize the church; they offer sacrifice in dissension and schism and greet with the name of peace peoples whom they banish from the peace of salvation. The unity of Christ is torn apart, the inheritance of Christ is blasphemed, the baptism of Christ is exorcized with breath; and they do not want these things in themselves to be corrected by temporal scourges through the ordained human authorities, so that they may not be destined to eternal punishment for such great sacrileges. We charge them with the fury of schism, the madness of rebaptism, the wicked separation from the inheritance of Christ, which is spread through all nations. From books not only ours but theirs we read out the churches whose names they read today and with which today they are not in communion. When these are read in their conventicles, they say to their readers, 'Peace be with you,' and yet have no peace with the very peoples to whom those letters were written. And they charge us with crimes of the dead, either false or, even if true, someone else's, not understanding that in the things we charge against them they are all held guilty, whereas in the things they charge against us it is the chaff or tares of the Lord's harvest that are blamed, and the crime does not touch the wheat. Nor do they consider that those who are pleased with the wicked in unity themselves share with the wicked; but those who are displeased with them and cannot correct them, and do not dare to root up the tares before harvest-time lest they root up the wheat with them, share not in their deeds but in the altar of Christ, so that they are not only not stained by them but even deserve to be praised and commended by the divine words; because, lest the name of Christ be blasphemed through horrible schisms, they tolerate for the good of unity what they hate for the good of justice.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Exorcized with breath' (exsufflatur) refers to the rite of breathing on candidates for exorcism, which the Donatists used on Catholics who joined them. 'Temporal scourges through the ordained human authorities' refers to imperial laws against the Donatists; translated as written. The 'books' are the New Testament letters addressed to churches overseas. The tares: Matt 13:24–30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.21 (CSEL 34.2:102–103; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-21).

## Letter 43.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:103–104
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads the letter to the angel of Ephesus as praise of a church leader who bore false apostles for Christ's name.

### Latin text

Si habent aures, audiant, quid spiritus dicat ecclesiis. sic enim in Apocalypsi Iohannis legitur: Angelo, inquit, ecclesiae Ephesi scribe: Haec dicit, qui tenet septem stellas in dextera sua, qui ambulat in medio septem candelabrorum aureorum: Scio opera tua et laborem et patientiam tuam et quia non potes sustinere malos et temptasti eos, qui se dicunt apostolos esse et non sunt, et inuenisti eos mendaces et patientiam habes et sustinuisti eos propter nomen meum et non defecisti. quod si de angelo superiorum caelorum et non de praepositis ecclesiae uellet intellegi, non consequenter diceret: Sed habeo aduersum te, quod caritatem tuam primam reliquisti. memor esto itaque, unde excideris, et age paenitentiam et prima opera fac; sin autem, uenio tibi et mouebo candelabrum tuum de loco suo, nisi paenitentiam egeris. hoc superioribus angelis dici non potest, qui perpetuam retinent caritatem, unde qui defecerunt et lapsi sunt, diabolus est et angeli eius. ergo primam caritatem dicit, quia sustinuit pseudoapostolos propter nomen Christi, quam iubet ut repetat et faciat priora opera sua. et obiciuntur nobis crimina malorum hominum, non nostra sed aliena et ipsa partim incognita. quae si etiam uera et praesentia uideremus et zizaniis propter frumenta parcentes pro unitate toleraremus, non solum nulla reprehensione sed etiam non parua laude nos dignos diceret, quicumque scripturas sanctas non corde surdus audiret.

### English translation (Claude)

If they have ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. For so we read in the Apocalypse of John: 'To the angel of the church of Ephesus,' he says, 'write: These things says he who holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks in the midst of the seven golden lampstands: I know your works, your labour and your patience, and that you cannot bear evil men, and have tested those who say they are apostles and are not, and have found them liars; and you have patience and have borne them for my name's sake, and have not grown weary.' If he wished this to be understood of an angel of the higher heavens and not of the overseers of the church, he would not go on to say: 'But I have this against you, that you have abandoned your first love. Remember therefore from where you have fallen, and repent and do the first works; or else I am coming to you and will move your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.' This cannot be said to the higher angels, who keep a perpetual love; those who failed and fell from it are the devil and his angels. So he speaks of the first love because he bore the false apostles for the name of Christ, and he commands him to recover it and do his former works. And the crimes of wicked men are charged against us, not ours but others', and some of them unknown. Even if we saw them to be true and present, and tolerated them for the sake of unity, sparing the tares for the sake of the wheat, anyone who heard the holy Scriptures with a heart not deaf would say that we deserved not only no blame but no small praise.

### Scripture references

- Rev 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 2:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 2:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Rev 2:7 (the refrain) and Rev 2:1–5. Augustine takes the 'angel' to be the bishop of the church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.22 (CSEL 34.2:103–104; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-22).

## Letter 43.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:104–106
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine gives examples from Aaron to Paul of saints who tolerated the wicked among God's people without being defiled.

### Latin text

Tolerat Aaron multitudinem idolum exigentem et fabricantem et adorantem; tolerat Moyses aduersus deum tot milia murmurantia et totiens offendentia sanctum nomen eius; tolerat Dauid Saulem persecutorem suum sceleratis moribus caelestia deserentem, magicis artibus inferna quaerentem, occisum uindicat, christum etiam domini propter sacramentum uenerandae unctionis appellat; tolerat Samuhel nefandos filios Heli, peruersos filios suos, quos populus quia tolerare noluit, diuina ueritate accusatus, diuina seueritate correptus est; tolerat denique ipsum populum superbum contemptorem dei; tolerat Esaias, in quos tam multa uera crimina iaculatur; tolerat Hieremias, a quibus tanta perpetitur; tolerat Zacharias Pharisaeos et scribas, quales illo tempore fuisse scriptura testatur. scio me multos praetermisisse; legant, qui uolunt, legant, qui possunt, eloquia caelestia, inuenient omnes sanctos dei seruos et amicos semper habuisse, quos in suo populo tolerarent, cum quibus tamen illius temporis sacramenta communicantes non solum non inquinabantur, sed etiam laudabiliter sustinebant studentes, sicut ait apostolus, seruare unitatem spiritus in uinculo pacis. adtendant etiam post domini aduentum, ubi multo plura huius tolerantiae per totum orbem inueniremus exempla, si omnia scribi et in auctoritatem redigi potuissent, — tamen haec ipsa, quae habemus, aduertite. tolerat ipse dominus Iudam diabolum, furem et uenditorem suum, sinit accipere inter innocentes discipulos, quod fideles nouerunt pretium nostrum; tolerant apostoli pseudoapostolos et inter sua quaerentes, non quae Iesu Christi, Paulus non sua quaerens, sed quae Iesu Christi, cum gloriosissima tolerantia conuersatur; postremo, quod paulo ante commemoraui, diuina uoce laudatur sub angeli nomine praepositus ecclesiae, quod, cum odisset malos, eos tamen temptatos et inuentos pro nomine domini tolerauit.

### English translation (Claude)

Aaron tolerates the multitude demanding, making, and worshipping an idol; Moses tolerates so many thousands murmuring against God and so often offending his holy name; David tolerates Saul his persecutor, who by his wicked conduct was abandoning heavenly things and seeking the powers below by magic arts; he avenges him when he is slain, and even calls him the Lord's anointed because of the sacrament of the venerable anointing. Samuel tolerates the wicked sons of Eli and his own perverse sons; and because the people would not tolerate them, they were accused by divine truth and rebuked by divine severity. He tolerates, finally, that proud people itself, a despiser of God. Isaiah tolerates those against whom he hurls so many true charges; Jeremiah tolerates those from whom he suffers so much; Zechariah tolerates the Pharisees and scribes, such as Scripture testifies them to have been at that time. I know I have passed over many; let those who wish, let those who can, read the heavenly words, and they will find that all the holy servants and friends of God always had people in their own nation whom they tolerated, sharing with them the sacraments of that time, yet they were not only not defiled but even endured them praiseworthily, striving, as the apostle says, to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. Let them consider also the time after the Lord's coming, when we would find far more examples of this toleration throughout the world, if all could have been written and given authority; but consider these very ones that we have. The Lord himself tolerates Judas, a devil, a thief, and his betrayer; he allows him to receive among the innocent disciples what the faithful know as our ransom. The apostles tolerate false apostles; and among those who seek their own, not the things of Jesus Christ, Paul, seeking not his own but the things of Jesus Christ, lives with most glorious toleration. Finally, as I mentioned a little earlier, an overseer of a church is praised by the divine voice under the name of an angel because, though he hated the wicked, yet when he had tested and found them out, he tolerated them for the name of the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Exod 32:1: allusion, high confidence
- Num 14:2: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Sam 24:6: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 1:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 28:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 2:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 8:3: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:70: allusion, high confidence
- John 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Exod 32; Num 14; 1 Sam 24:6 and 2 Sam 1:14–16; 1 Sam 28; 1 Sam 2:12–17 and 8:1–7; Luke 1 (Zechariah father of John the Baptist); Eph 4:3; John 6:70 and 12:6; Phil 2:21; 2 Cor 11:13; Rev 2:2. 'What the faithful know as our ransom' refers to Judas's sharing in the Last Supper.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.23 (CSEL 34.2:104–106; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-23).

## Letter 43.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:106–107
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points to the Donatists' own toleration of Circumcellion violence and of Optatus, and argues that schism is punished more severely than idolatry.

### Latin text

Ad summam se ipsos interrogent. nonne tolerantur ab eis caedes et incendia Circumcellionum, ueneratores praecipitatorum ultro cadauerum et sub incredibilibus malis unius Optati per tot annos totius Africae gemitus? parco iam dicere singularum per Africam regionum et ciuitatum et fundorum tyrannicas potestates et publica latrocinia. melius enim uobis haec uos ipsi dicitis siue in aurem siue palam, sicut libitum fuerit. quocumque enim oculos uerteritis, occurret, quod dico uel potius quod taceo. neque hinc istos, quos ibi diligitis, accusamus. non enim nobis displicent, quia tolerant malos, sed quia intolerabiliter mali sunt propter schisma, propter altare contra altare, propter separationem ab hereditate Christi toto orbe diffusa, sicut tanto ante promissa est. uiolatam pacem, conscissam unitatem, iterata baptismata, exsufflata sacramenta, quae in sceleratis quoque hominibus sancta sunt, plangimus et lugemus. quae si parui pendunt, intueantur exempla, quibus demonstratum est, quanti haec penderit deus. qui fecerunt idolum, usitata gladii morte perempti sunt; qui uero schisma facere uoluerunt, hiatu terrae principes deuorati et turba consentiens igne consumpta est. diuersitate poenarum diuersitas agnoscitur meritorum.

### English translation (Claude)

In short, let them question themselves. Do they not tolerate the murders and burnings of the Circumcellions, the venerators of the corpses of those who have thrown themselves down of their own accord, and, under the incredible evils of the one man Optatus, the groaning of all Africa for so many years? I refrain from speaking of the tyrannical powers and public robberies in the separate regions, cities, and estates throughout Africa. You can say these things better to yourselves, either in the ear or openly, as you please. For wherever you turn your eyes you will meet what I say, or rather what I leave unsaid. Nor do we accuse those whom you love there on this account; for we are not displeased with them because they tolerate the wicked, but because they are intolerably wicked through schism, through altar against altar, through separation from the inheritance of Christ spread through the whole world, as it was promised so long before. We lament and mourn violated peace, torn unity, repeated baptisms, sacraments exorcized with breath, which are holy even in wicked men. If they think little of these things, let them look at the examples which show how much God thought of them. Those who made an idol were slain by the ordinary death of the sword; but of those who chose to make a schism, the leaders were swallowed by the opening of the earth and the crowd that agreed with them was consumed by fire. By the difference of punishments the difference of deserts is recognized.

### Scripture references

- Exod 32:28: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:31: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:35: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Optatus, Donatist bishop of Thamugadi (d. 398), allied with the rebel Gildo. Allusions to Exod 32:27–28 and Num 16:31–35 (Korah).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.24 (CSEL 34.2:106–107; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-24).

## Letter 43.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:107–108
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sums up the history and appeals to the worldwide church, foretold in Ps 2:8, as the proof that the Donatists are cut off from Christ's inheritance.

### Latin text

Traduntur in persecutione sancti codices, confitentur traditores et deo dimittuntur; non interrogantur innocentes et ab hominibus temerariis damnantur; probatur integer certis iudiciis, qui inter damnatos absentes multo uehementius ceteris criminatus est; iudicium episcoporum; ad imperatorem appellatur; iudex eligitur imperator; iudicans contemnitur imperator. quae tunc acta sint, legistis; quae nunc agantur, uidetis. si de illis in aliquo dubitatis, ista iam cernite. certe non chartis ueteribus, non archiuis publicis, non gestis forensibus aut ecclesiasticis agamus. maior liber noster orbis terrarum est; in eo lego completum, quod in libro dei lego promissum: Dominus, inquit, dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te; postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. huic hereditati qui non communicat, quoslibet libros teneat, exheredatum se esse cognoscat; hanc hereditatem quisquis expugnat, alienum se esse a familia dei satis indicat. certe de traditione diuinorum librorum uertitur quaestio, ubi hereditas ista promissa est. ille ergo credatur testamentum tradidisse flammis, qui contra uoluntatem litigat testatoris. quid tibi fecit, o pars Donati, quid tibi fecit ecclesia Corinthiorum? quod autem de ista dico, de omnibus talibus et tam longe positis intellegi uolo. quid uobis fecerunt, quae nec omnino, quid feceritis, nec, quos infamaueritis, nosse potuerunt? an quia Lucillam Caecilianus in Africa laesit, lucem Christi orbis amisit?

### English translation (Claude)

The holy books are handed over in persecution; the traitors confess and are left to God; innocent men are not questioned and are condemned by rash men; the one who among the absent condemned was accused far more fiercely than the rest is proved upright by sure judgements; there is a judgement of bishops; appeal is made to the emperor; the emperor is chosen as judge; the emperor, when he judges, is despised. What was done then, you have read; what is being done now, you see. If you have any doubt about those things, look now at these. Let us certainly not deal in old papers, public archives, or court or church records. Our greater book is the whole world; in it I read fulfilled what I read promised in the book of God: 'The Lord,' it says, 'said to me: You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance and the ends of the earth as your possession.' Let whoever does not communicate with this inheritance know that he is disinherited, whatever books he holds; whoever attacks this inheritance shows clearly enough that he is a stranger to the family of God. Surely the question turns on the handing over of the divine books, in which this inheritance is promised. Let him, then, be believed to have handed the testament over to the flames who goes to law against the will of the testator. What has the church of the Corinthians done to you, O party of Donatus, what has it done to you? And what I say of it I wish to be understood of all such churches, set so far away. What have they done to you, which could not know at all either what you had done or whom you had defamed? Or did the world lose the light of Christ because Caecilian offended Lucilla in Africa?

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Ps 2:7–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.25 (CSEL 34.2:107–108; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-25).

## Letter 43.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:108
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the Maximianist schism against Primian with the Donatist schism against Caecilian and asks the Donatists to judge both alike.

### Latin text

Tandem sentiant, quod fecerunt; merito certo annorum interuallo in oculos eorum reuolutum est opus ipsorum. quaerite, per quam feminam Maximianus, qui dicitur esse Donati propinquus, sese a Primiani communione praeciderit et quem ad modum congregata episcoporum factione Primianum damnarit absentem et aduersus eum episcopus ordinatus sit, quem ad modum Maiorinus per Lucillam congregata episcoporum factione Caecilianum damnauit absentem et contra eum episcopus ordinatus est. an forte, quod a ceteris Afris suae communionis episcopis contra factionem Maximiani Primianus purgatus est, ualere uultis et, quod a transmarinis unitatis episcopis aduersus factionem Maiorini Caecilianus purgatus est, ualere non uultis? rogo, fratres mei, quid magnum peto? quid difficile a uobis intellegi cupio? multum quidem interest et incomparabiliter distat uel auctoritate uel numero Africana ecclesia, si cum ceteris orbis partibus conferatur, et longe minor est, etiam si unitas hic esset, longe omnino minor est comparata ceteris Christianis omnibus gentibus quam pars Maximiani comparata parti Primiani. peto tamen et iustum esse arbitror, ut tantum ualeat concilium Secundi Tigisitani, quod Lucilla conflauit aduersus absentem Caecilianum et apostolicas sedes totumque orbem Caeciliano communicantem, quantum ualet concilium Maximianensium, quod similiter femina nescio quae conflauit aduersus absentem Primianum et ceteram per Africam multitudinem Primiano communicantem. quid apertius cernitur? quid aequius postulatur?

### English translation (Claude)

Let them at last feel what they have done; deservedly, after a certain interval of years, their own deed has rolled back before their eyes. Inquire through what woman Maximian, who is said to be a relative of Donatus, cut himself off from the communion of Primian, and how, having gathered a faction of bishops, he condemned Primian in his absence and a bishop was ordained against him; just as Majorinus, through Lucilla, having gathered a faction of bishops, condemned Caecilian in his absence and a bishop was ordained against him. Or perhaps you want it to be valid that Primian was cleared against the faction of Maximian by the other African bishops of his communion, and do not want it to be valid that Caecilian was cleared against the faction of Majorinus by the bishops of unity overseas? I ask you, my brothers, what great thing do I ask? What difficult thing do I want you to understand? There is indeed a great difference, and an incomparable distance, in authority or number between the African church and the other parts of the world; and even if unity were here, it is far smaller, far smaller altogether, compared with all the other Christian nations, than the party of Maximian compared with the party of Primian. Yet I ask, and think it just, that the council of Secundus of Tigisis, which Lucilla got together against the absent Caecilian and against the apostolic sees and the whole world in communion with Caecilian, should have as much force as the council of the Maximianists, which likewise some woman or other got together against the absent Primian and the rest of the multitude throughout Africa in communion with Primian. What is seen more plainly? What is asked more fairly?

### Translation notes

- The Maximianist schism within the Donatist church (393).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.26 (CSEL 34.2:108; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-26).

## Letter 43.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:108–109
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the Donatists to put eternal salvation above human friendships and to find what answer their leaders can give.

### Latin text

Videtis haec omnia et nostis et gemitis; et tamen uidet et deus, quod uos in tam pestifera et sacrilega praecisione nulla res cogit remanere, si pro adipiscendo spiritali regno carnalem superetis affectum et amicitias hominum, quae in iudicio dei nihil proderunt, pro deuitandis sempiternis poenis non timeatis offendere. ecce ite, consulite; quid contra haec nostra possint respondere, cognoscite. si proferunt chartas, proferimus chartas; si falsas nostras esse dicunt, hoc nos de suis dicere non indignentur. nemo delet de caelo constitutionem dei. nemo delet de terra ecclesiam dei; ille totum orbem promisit, ista totum orbem repleuit et malos habet et bonos, sed nec in terris amittit nisi malos nec in caelum admittit nisi bonos. erit autem uobis hic sermo, quem de munere dei nouit ipse quanta et pacis et uestra dilectione deprompsimus, correctio, si uelitis, testis uero, etsi nolitis.

### English translation (Claude)

You see all these things, you know them, and you groan; and yet God too sees that nothing compels you to remain in so pestilent and sacrilegious a separation, if, to gain the spiritual kingdom, you overcome carnal affection, and, to avoid eternal punishment, you do not fear to offend friendships with men, which will be of no profit at the judgement of God. Go, then, and consult; find out what they can answer to these arguments of ours. If they produce documents, we produce documents; if they say ours are false, let them not be indignant if we say this of theirs. No one blots out from heaven the decree of God; no one blots out from the earth the church of God. He promised the whole world; she has filled the whole world, and she has both bad and good, but on earth she loses none but the bad, and into heaven she admits none but the good. This discourse, which he himself knows with how great love both of peace and of you we have drawn from the gift of God, will be a correction for you if you will, and a witness if you will not.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 43.27 (CSEL 34.2:108–109; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/43-12/#p-43-27).

## Letter 44.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:109–110
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the Donatist laymen how he visited their bishop Fortunius at Thubursicum, where a noisy crowd hindered the discussion.

### Latin text

Fortunium, quem Tubursicu habetis episcopum, per eandem ciuitatem quamquam festinantissime cum ad Cirtensem ecclesiam pergeremus, experti sumus ita omnino, ut de illo soletis benignissime polliceri. eam ipsam quippe uestram de illo nobis sermocinationem cum ei renuntiaremus uolentes eum uidere, non abnuit. uenimus itaque ad eum, quia aetati eius id a nobis deferendum uidebatur potius quam exigendum, ut ipse ad nos ueniret prior. perreximus ergo comitantibus non paucis, quos forte adgregatos nobis illud tempus inuenerat. cum autem apud eum consedissemus, rumore disperso non parua praeterea turba confluxit. sed in tota illa multitudine perpauci apparebant, qui utiliter ac salubriter agi causam illam et tantam reique tantae quaestionem prudenter et pie discuti cuperent. ceteri uero magis ad spectaculum quasi altercationis nostrae prope theatrica consuetudine quam ad instructionem salutis Christiana deuotione conuenerant. quapropter nec silentium nobis praebere nec intente atque nobiscum modeste saltem et ordinate conloqui potuerunt exceptis, ut dixi, paucis, quorum religiosa et simplex apparebat intentio. itaque libere pro sui cuiusque animi motu inmoderate loquentium strepitu omnia turbabantur nec euincere siue nos siue ipse rogando, interdum etiam obiurgando potuimus, ut nobis modestum silentium praeberetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Fortunius, whom you have as bishop at Thubursicum, we found, as we passed through that city in great haste on our way to the church of Cirta, to be exactly as you are accustomed to describe him so kindly. For when we reported to him that very conversation of yours about him, wishing to see him, he did not refuse. So we came to him, because it seemed that out of respect for his age we ought to pay him this courtesy rather than demand that he come to us first. We went, then, accompanied by not a few who happened to have joined us at the time. When we had sat down with him, as the rumour spread, a considerable crowd besides flocked together. But in that whole multitude very few appeared who wished the case to be handled usefully and wholesomely, and so great a question on so great a matter to be discussed prudently and piously. The rest had come together more for the spectacle of a kind of contest between us, almost as at a theatre, than for instruction in salvation with Christian devotion. So they could neither give us silence nor talk with us attentively, or even with moderation and order, except, as I said, a few, whose intention appeared religious and sincere. And so everything was thrown into confusion by the din of people talking freely and immoderately as each one's feeling moved him; nor could either we or he, by asking and sometimes even scolding, prevail on them to give us a decent silence.

### Translation notes

- To Eleusius, Glorius, and the Felixes, Donatists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.1 (CSEL 34.2:109–110; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-1).

## Letter 44.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:110–111
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the attempt to record the debate failed amid the noise and that he now writes down what he remembers.

### Latin text

Res tamen utcumque agi coepta est et aliquot horas in alterno sermone protraximus, quantum uocibus interquiescentibus uarie tumultuantium sinebamur. sed in ipso disputationis exordio cum uideremus ea, quae dicebantur, subinde labi de memoria uel nostra uel eorum, quorum salutem maxime curabamus, et ut esset nobis cautior modestiorque tractatio, simul et uos atque alii fratres, qui absentes erant, quid inter nos actum esset, legendo cognosceretis, postulauimus, ut a notariis uerba nostra exciperentur. diu ab illo uel ei consentientibus reluctatum est; postea tamen ipse concessit. sed notarii, qui aderant atque id strenue facere poterant, nescio qua causa excipere noluerunt. egimus saltem, ut fratres, qui nobiscum erant, quamquam in hac re tardius possent, exciperent, pollicentes nos ibi easdem tabulas relicturos. consensum est. coeperunt uerba nostra excipi et aliqua ab inuicem ad tabulas dicta sunt. postea inordinatas perstrepentium interpellationes et propterea nostram quoque turbulentiorem disputationem notarii non ualentes sustinere cesserunt nobis sane non desistentibus et, ut cuique facultas dabatur, multa dicentibus. ex quibus omnibus uerbis nostris, quantum recordari potui causae totius actionem, dilectionem uestram fraudare nolui. potestis enim ei litteras meas legere, ut uel adprobet me uera scripsisse uel ipse uobis, si quid melius recolit, incunctanter insinuet.

### English translation (Claude)

Nevertheless the matter was begun somehow, and we prolonged it for some hours in alternate speech, as far as the pauses in the voices of those variously raising a tumult allowed us. But at the very beginning of the debate, seeing that what was said slipped repeatedly from the memory either of ourselves or of those whose salvation we chiefly cared about, and so that our handling might be more careful and moderate, and at the same time you and the other brothers who were absent might learn by reading what had passed between us, we asked that our words be taken down by stenographers. For a long time he, or those who agreed with him, resisted; afterwards, however, he himself consented. But the stenographers who were present and could do this efficiently refused, for some reason I do not know, to take them down. We arranged at least that the brothers who were with us should take them down, though they were slower at this, promising that we would leave the tablets there. It was agreed. Our words began to be taken down, and some things were said by each side for the record. Afterwards, the stenographers, unable to keep up with the disorderly interruptions of the noisy crowd and our discussion, which had therefore also become more turbulent, gave up; but we did not stop, and said much as each had opportunity. From all these words of ours I did not wish to cheat your Affection of an account of the whole proceedings, as far as I could remember them. For you can read him my letter, so that he may either confirm that I have written the truth or, if he recalls anything better, tell you without hesitation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.2 (CSEL 34.2:110–111; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-2).

## Letter 44.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:111–112
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that Fortunius praised his life but claimed his own communion was worldwide, which Augustine proposed to test by letters of communion.

### Latin text

Primo enim uitam nostram, quam uobis beniuolentius fortasse quam uerius narrantibus se comperisse dicebat, praedicare dignatus est adiungens dixisse se uobis nos omnia, quae de nobis insinuaratis, bene facere potuisse, si in ecclesia faceremus. deinde quaerere coepimus, quaenam illa esset ecclesia, ubi uiuere sic oporteret, utrum illa, quae, sicut sancta tanto ante scriptura praedixerat, se terrarum orbe diffunderet, an illa, quam pars exigua uel Afrorum uel Africae contineret. hic primo adserere conatus ubique terrarum esse communionem suam. quaerebam, utrum epistulas communicatorias, quas formatas dicimus, posset, quo uellem, dare, et adfirmabam, quod manifestum erat omnibus, hoc modo facillime illam terminari posse quaestionem. parabam autem, ut, si consentiret, ad illas ecclesias a nobis tales litterae mitterentur, quas in apostolicis auctoritatibus pariter legeremus illo iam tempore fuisse fundatas.

### English translation (Claude)

First, then, he was good enough to praise our life, which he said he had learned of from you, who described it perhaps more kindly than truly, adding that he had told you that we could have done well all the things you had reported of us if we did them in the church. Then we began to ask which church that was in which one ought to live so: whether it was the one which, as holy Scripture had foretold so long before, spread itself through the whole world, or the one which a small part of the Africans, or of Africa, contained. Here he first tried to assert that his communion was everywhere on earth. I asked whether he could give letters of communion, which we call 'formed letters', to any place I wished, and I affirmed, what was plain to all, that in this way that question could be settled most easily. I was ready, if he agreed, for such letters to be sent by us to those churches which we read alike in the apostolic writings to have been founded already at that time.

### Translation notes

- 'Formed letters' (litterae formatae) were letters of communion sealed with a fixed formula, by which churches recognized one another's members.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.3 (CSEL 34.2:111–112; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-3).

## Letter 44.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:112–113
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts the exchange on false prophets and on persecution, arguing that suffering proves nothing unless it is for righteousness.

### Latin text

Sed quia res aperte falsa erat, permixtis uerbis cito inde discessum est. inter quae uerba euangelicam illam domini admonitionem commemorauit, qua dixit: Cauete a pseudoprophetis; multi ad uos uenient in uestitu ouium, intus autem sunt lupi rapaces; ex fructibus eorum cognoscetis eos. quae uerba domini cum diceremus eadem de illis a nobis posse recitari, uentum inde est ad exaggerationem persecutionis, quam saepe suam partem pertulisse dicebat hinc uolens ostendere suos esse Christianos, quia persecutionem paterentur. inter quae uerba cum ego pararem ex euangelio respondere, inde capitulum commemorauit prior, ubi dominus ait: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur propter iustitiam, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum. quo loco ego gratulatus subieci statim id ergo esse quaerendum, utrum illi persecutionem propter iustitiam passi fuerint. in qua quaestione discuti cupiebam, quod quidem omnibus clarum erat, utrum eos in unitate ecclesiae constitutos an schismate iam diuisos Macariana tempora inuenerint, ut, qui uidere uellent, utrum propter iustitiam persecutionem passi fuerint, id potius adtenderent, utrum se recte a totius orbis unitate praeciderint, quod si iniuste fecisse inuenirentur, manifestum esset eos propter iniustitiam potius quam propter iustitiam passos persecutionem et ideo numero beatorum adiungi non posse, de quibus dictum est: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur propter iustitiam. ibi commemorata est famosior quam certior codicum illa traditio. sed respondebatur a partibus nostris principes illorum potius fuisse traditores; quod si in hac re nostrorum litteris nollent credere, nec nos cogi oportere, ut litteris credamus ipsorum.

### English translation (Claude)

But because the claim was plainly false, we quickly moved away from it amid confused talk. In the course of this he quoted that warning of the Lord in the gospel, where he said: 'Beware of false prophets; many will come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves; by their fruits you will know them.' When we said that we could quote the same words of the Lord about them, we came next to an exaggerated account of the persecution which he said his party had often suffered, wishing to show from this that his people were Christians because they suffered persecution. As I was preparing to answer from the gospel, he quoted first the chapter where the Lord says: 'Blessed are those who suffer persecution for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.' At this point I welcomed it and added at once that this, then, was what had to be inquired into: whether they had suffered persecution for righteousness' sake. In this question I wished to discuss what was indeed clear to all: whether the times of Macarius found them established in the unity of the church or already divided by schism; so that those who wished to see whether they had suffered persecution for righteousness' sake should rather consider whether they had rightly cut themselves off from the unity of the whole world; and if they were found to have done so unjustly, it would be plain that they had suffered persecution for unrighteousness rather than for righteousness, and therefore could not be added to the number of the blessed of whom it was said: 'Blessed are those who suffer persecution for righteousness' sake.' Then that handing over of the books was mentioned, more notorious than certain. But it was answered from our side that it was rather their founders who were the traitors; and that if in this matter they would not believe the documents of our side, we ought not to be forced to believe theirs.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Matt 7:15–16 and Matt 5:10. 'The times of Macarius': the imperial repression of the Donatists under the commissioner Macarius (347–348).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.4 (CSEL 34.2:112–113; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-4).

## Letter 44.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:113
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks how the Donatists could separate from the churches overseas, and whether they were in communion with the East before Macarius.

### Latin text

Sed tamen sequestrata ista dubia quaestione quaerebam, quo modo se isti iuste separassent ab innocentia ceterorum Christianorum, qui per orbem terrarum successionis ordinem custodientes in antiquissimis ecclesiis constituti penitus ignorarent, qui fuerint in Africa traditores, qui certe non possent communicare nisi eis, quos sedere in sedibus episcopalibus audiebant. respondit tam diu transmarinarum partium ecclesias mansisse innocentes, donec consensissent in eorum sanguinem, quos Macarianam persecutionem pertulisse dicebat. ubi ego possem quidem dicere nec inuidia Macariani temporis innocentiam transmarinarum ecclesiarum contaminari potuisse, quando quidem nullo modo probaretur illis auctoribus etiam fecisse, quae fecerat; sed de compendio quaerere malui, si Macarii saeuitia, ex quo in eam consensisse dicebantur transmarinae ecclesiae, suam innocentiam perdiderunt, utrum saltem probaretur usque ad illa tempora Donatistas cum orientalibus ecclesiis ceterisque orbis partium in unitate mansisse.

### English translation (Claude)

But setting aside that doubtful question, I asked how these men had justly separated themselves from the innocence of the rest of the Christians, who throughout the world, keeping the order of succession in the most ancient churches, were wholly ignorant of who had been traitors in Africa, and certainly could communicate only with those whom they heard to be sitting in the episcopal sees. He answered that the churches overseas had remained innocent until they consented to the shedding of the blood of those who he said had suffered the persecution of Macarius. Here I could indeed have said that the innocence of the churches overseas could not be stained even by the odium of the time of Macarius, since it was in no way proved that he did what he did on their authority; but I preferred to ask for the sake of brevity: if, through the cruelty of Macarius, the churches overseas had lost their innocence from the time when they were said to have consented to it, could it at least be proved that up to that time the Donatists had remained in unity with the Eastern churches and the other parts of the world?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.5 (CSEL 34.2:113; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-5).

## Letter 44.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:113–114
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the letter Fortunius produced, from the council at Serdica to a bishop Donatus, came from the Arian party that condemned Athanasius and Julius.

### Latin text

Tunc protulit quoddam uolumen, ubi uolebat ostendere Serdicense concilium ad episcopos Afros, qui erant communionis Donati, dedisse litteras. quod cum legeretur, audiuimus Donati nomen inter ceteros episcopos, quibus illi scripserant. itaque flagitare coepimus, ut doceretur, utrum ipse esset Donatus, de cuius parte isti cognominantur; fieri enim potuisse, ut alicui Donato alterius haeresis episcopo scripserint, cum maxime in illis nominibus nec Africae mentio facta fuerit; quo modo ergo posset probare Donatum partis Donati episcopum nomine illo accipiendum esse, quando ne id quidem probare posset, utrum ad Africanarum specialiter ecclesiarum episcopos illae litterae missae fuerint. quamquam enim Donati nomen Afrum esse soleat, non tamen repugnaret a uero, ut uel partium illarum aliquis uocaretur Afro nomine uel aliquis Afer in illis partibus constitueretur episcopus. neque enim in eis uel diem uel consulem inuenimus, ut saltem consideratis temporibus certi aliquid eluceret. sane quoniam nescio quando audieramus Arrianos, cum a communione catholica discrepassent, Donatistas in Africa sibi sociare temptasse, ad aurem mihi hoc ipsum frater Alypius suggessit. tunc accepto ipso uolumine eiusdem concilii statuta considerans legi Athanasium episcopum Alexandrinum catholicum, cuius maxime aduersus Arrianos acerrimarum disputationum conflictus eminuit, et Iulium ecclesiae Romanae episcopum nihilo minus catholicum illo concilio Serdicensi fuisse inprobatos. unde apud nos constitit Arrianorum fuisse concilium, quibus isti episcopi catholici uehementissime resistebant. itaque ad diligentiorem etiam temporum discussionem uoluimus ipsum uolumen accipere atque auferre nobiscum. qui noluit dare dicens ibi nos habere illud, quando aliquid in eo considerare uellemus. rogaui etiam, ut manu mea notari permitteret, fateor, timens, ne mihi forte, causa exigente cum petendum esset, pro illo aliud proferretur. neque hoc uoluit.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he produced a certain volume, in which he wished to show that the Council of Serdica had sent a letter to the African bishops who were of Donatus's communion. When it was read, we heard the name of Donatus among the other bishops to whom they had written. So we began to demand that it be shown whether this was the Donatus from whom their party takes its name; for it could have happened that they wrote to some Donatus, a bishop of another heresy, especially since in those names no mention was made of Africa. How then could he prove that by that name Donatus, bishop of Donatus's party, was to be understood, when he could not even prove that the letter had been sent specifically to bishops of the African churches? For although Donatus is usually an African name, it would not be unlikely that someone of those regions was called by an African name, or that some African was made bishop in those regions. Nor did we find in it either day or consul, so that at least by considering the dates something certain might appear. Indeed, since we had heard at some time that the Arians, when they had broken from Catholic communion, had tried to ally the Donatists in Africa with themselves, brother Alypius suggested this very thing in my ear. Then, taking the volume itself and considering the decrees of that council, I read that Athanasius, the Catholic bishop of Alexandria, whose conflict in most vigorous debates especially against the Arians was outstanding, and Julius, bishop of the Roman church, no less Catholic, had been condemned by that Council of Serdica. From this it was clear to us that it was a council of the Arians, whom these Catholic bishops most vehemently resisted. So we wished to take the volume and carry it away with us, to examine the dates more carefully too. He would not give it, saying that we would have it there whenever we wished to examine anything in it. I asked him also to let me mark it with my own hand, fearing, I confess, that when the case required it and it had to be asked for, something else might be produced in its place. He would not allow this either.

### Translation notes

- The letter came from the Eastern bishops who withdrew from Serdica to Philippopolis (343) and condemned Athanasius and Julius of Rome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.6 (CSEL 34.2:113–114; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-6).

## Letter 44.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:114–115
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers that suffering persecution does not prove righteousness, citing Ambrose and Maximian, whom the Donatists did not consider righteous.

### Latin text

Deinde mihi coepit instare, ut ad interrogationem suam breuiter responderem, quaerens a me, quem iustum putarem, eum, qui persequeretur, an eum, qui persecutionem pateretur. cui respondebam non recte ita interrogari; fieri enim posse, ut ambo iniqui sint, fieri etiam posse, ut iniquiorem iustior persequatur: non ergo esse consequens, ut ideo sit quisque iustior, quia persecutionem patitur, quamuis id plerumque contingat. deinde cum uiderem in hoc eum multum inmorari, ut iustitiam suae partis ex eo certam uellet intellegi, quia persecutionem passa fuerit, quaesiui ab eo, utrum iustum et Christianum putaret episcopum Mediolanensis ecclesiae Ambrosium. cogebatur utique negare, quod ille uir Christianus esset et iustus, quia, si fateretur, statim obiceremus, quod eum rebaptizandum esse censeret. cum ergo ea loqui cogeretur, quibus ille non esset habendus Christianus et iustus, commemoraui, quantam persecutionem pertulerit circumdata etiam militibus armatis ecclesia. quaesiui etiam, utrum Maximianum, qui ab eis apud Carthaginem schisma fecerit, et iustum et Christianum putaret. non poterat nisi negare. commemoraui ergo etiam illum talem persecutionem pertulisse, ut ecclesia eius usque ad fundamenta dirueretur. his igitur exemplis ei, si possem, persuadere moliebar, ut iam desineret dicere persecutionis perpessionem Christianae iustitiae certissimum esse documentum.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he began to press me to answer his question briefly, asking me whom I thought righteous, the one who persecuted or the one who suffered persecution. I answered that the question was not rightly put; for it could happen that both were wicked, and it could also happen that a more righteous man persecuted a more wicked one; so it did not follow that anyone was more righteous because he suffered persecution, though this is often the case. Then, seeing that he dwelt much on this, wishing the righteousness of his party to be taken as certain from the fact that it had suffered persecution, I asked him whether he thought Ambrose, bishop of the church of Milan, a righteous man and a Christian. He was of course compelled to deny that that man was a Christian and righteous, because, if he admitted it, we would at once object that he held that Ambrose must be rebaptized. So, when he was forced to say things by which Ambrose was not to be held a Christian and righteous, I reminded him how great a persecution Ambrose had endured, when his church was even surrounded by armed soldiers. I also asked whether he thought Maximian, who had made a schism from them at Carthage, both righteous and a Christian. He could only deny it. So I reminded him that Maximian too had suffered such persecution that his church was torn down to its foundations. By these examples, then, I tried, if I could, to persuade him to stop saying that suffering persecution is the surest proof of Christian righteousness.

### Translation notes

- Ambrose's basilica was surrounded by troops of the empress Justina in 386.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.7 (CSEL 34.2:114–115; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-7).

## Letter 44.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:115–116
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Fortunius's story of a Donatist interventor killed by Catholics: the story must be verified, and killing does not decide which side is righteous.

### Latin text

Narrauit etiam in ipsa schismatis nouitate maiores suos, cum cogitarent culpam Caeciliani, ne schisma fieret, quoquo modo uelle sopire, dedisse quendam interuentorem populo suae communionis apud Carthaginem constituto, antequam Maiorinus aduersus Caecilianum ordinaretur. hunc ergo interuentorem in suo conuenticulo a nostris dicebat occisum. quod, fateor, numquam antea prorsus audieram, cum tam multa ab eis obiecta crimina refellerentur et redarguerentur a nostris atque in eos plura et maiora iacerentur. sed tamen postea, quam hoc narrauit, rursus a me instanter coepit quaerere, quem iustum putarem, eumne, qui occidit, an eum, qui occisus esset, quasi iam mihi probauisset ita, ut narrauerat, esse commissum. dicebam ergo prius, utrum uerum esset, esse quaerendum; non enim temere credi oportere, quaecumque dicuntur; et tamen fieri potuisse, ut uel ambo aeque mali essent uel etiam peiorem quisquam malus occideret. re uera enim fieri potest, ut sceleratior sit rebaptizator totius hominis quam solius corporis interemptor.

### English translation (Claude)

He also related that at the very beginning of the schism his predecessors, considering the fault of Caecilian and wishing somehow to settle it so that a schism might not arise, had given a certain interventor to the people of their communion at Carthage before Majorinus was ordained against Caecilian; and he said that this interventor was killed by our people in his meeting-place. This, I confess, I had never heard at all before, although so many crimes they alleged had been refuted and disproved by our people, and more and greater ones charged against them. Yet after he told this, he began again to ask me insistently whom I thought righteous, the one who killed or the one who had been killed, as though he had already proved to me that it was done as he had related. I said, then, that first it must be asked whether it was true, for not everything that is said should be rashly believed; and yet it could have happened that both were equally bad, or even that a bad man killed a worse one. For indeed it can be that a rebaptizer of the whole man is more criminal than a slayer of the body alone.

### Translation notes

- An 'interventor' was a bishop appointed to administer a vacant see until a new bishop was chosen.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.8 (CSEL 34.2:115–116; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-8).

## Letter 44.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:116–117
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes Donatist violence and answers Fortunius's question about killing by citing Elijah, while granting that such deeds are not done by good men now.

### Latin text

Unde etiam illud, quod a me postea quaesiuit, iam quaerendum non erat. ait enim etiam malum non debuisse occidi a Christianis et iustis; quasi nos eos, qui haec in catholica faciunt, iustos uocemus. quae tamen nobis ab istis dici facilius quam probari solent, cum tam multas uiolentissimas caedes et strages plerique ipsorum et episcopi et presbyteri et quilibet clerici congregatis turbis hominum furiosissimorum non catholicis sed non numquam etiam suis, ubi possunt, inferre non cessent. quae cum ita sint, dissimulans tamen ab sceleratissimis factis suorum, quae ipse plus nouit, urguebat, ut dicerem, quis iustorum uel malum aliquem occiderit. quod etiam si ad causam iam non pertinebat, fatebamur enim haec ubicumque sub nomine Christiano fierent, non fieri a bonis, sed tamen ut admoneretur, quid esset quaerendum, respondimus quaerentes, utrum Helias iustus ei uideretur fuisse, quod negare non potuit. deinde subiecimus, quam multos pseudoprophetas sua manu peremerit. hic re uera uidit, quod uidendum erat, alia licuisse tunc iustis; haec enim prophetico spiritu auctoritate dei faciebant, qui procul dubio nouit, cui etiam prosit occidi. exigebat ergo, ut docerem, iam noui testamenti temporibus qui iustorum aliquem occiderit etiam sceleratum et impium.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence what he asked me afterwards no longer needed to be asked. For he said that even a bad man ought not to be killed by Christians and righteous men; as if we called righteous those who do such things in the Catholic Church. Such things, however, are more easily said against us by them than proved, since many of them, bishops, presbyters, and clergy of every kind, gathering crowds of most furious men, do not cease to inflict so many most violent murders and massacres, where they can, not only on Catholics but sometimes even on their own people. This being so, he nevertheless, ignoring the most criminal deeds of his own people, which he knows better than we, pressed me to say which of the righteous had killed anyone, even a bad man. Although this no longer concerned the case (for we admitted that such things, wherever they are done under the Christian name, are not done by the good), yet, to remind him of what should be inquired into, we answered by asking whether he thought Elijah had been righteous, which he could not deny. Then we added how many false prophets he had slain with his own hand. Here indeed he saw what had to be seen, that other things were permitted to the righteous then; for they did these things by the prophetic spirit, by the authority of God, who no doubt knows for whom it is even beneficial to be killed. So he demanded that I show who among the righteous, in the times of the New Testament, had killed anyone, even a criminal and ungodly man.

### Scripture references

- 1 Kgs 18:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 1 Kgs 18:40 (3 Kgdms 18:40 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.9 (CSEL 34.2:116–117; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-9).

## Letter 44.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:117–118
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Christ's toleration of Judas at the Last Supper and rebuts the claim that the apostles then had only John's baptism.

### Latin text

Tunc reditum est ad superiorem tractatum, quod uolebamus ostendere neque nos illis debere obicere suorum scelera neque illos nobis, si qua inuenirentur talia facta nostrorum. de nouo enim testamento ostendi quidem non posse, quod iustus quisquam interfecerit aliquem; sed tamen illud probari posse ipso exemplo domini sceleratos ab innocentibus fuisse toleratos. traditorem enim suum, qui iam pretium eius acceperat, usque ad ultimum osculum pacis inter innocentes secum esse perpessus est. quibus non tacuit esse inter illos tanti sceleris hominem et tamen primum sacramentum corporis et sanguinis sui nondum illo excluso communiter omnibus dedit. quo exemplo cum prope omnes mouerentur, temptauit dicere ante passionem domini communionem illam cum scelerato non obfuisse apostolis, quia nondum habebant baptismum Christi sed baptismum Iohannis. quod posteaquam dixit, coepi ab eo quaerere, quem ad modum ergo scriptum esset, quod Iesus baptizauerit plures quam Iohannes, cum ipse non baptizaret sed discipuli eius, hoc est per suos discipulos baptizaret quo modo ergo dabant, quod non acceperant, quod ipsi maxime solent dicere? an forte Christus baptismo Iohannis baptizabat? deinde in hac sententia multa quaesiturus eram, quo modo ab ipso Iohanne tunc quaesitum sit de baptismo domini et responderit, quod ille haberet sponsam et ille esset sponsus. numquid ergo fas erat, ut baptismo Iohannis baptizaret sponsus, id est baptismo amici uel serui? deinde quo modo poterant eucharistiam accipere nondum baptizati? aut quo modo Petro uolenti, ut totum se lauaret, responderit: Qui lotus est semel, non eum oportet iterum lauari, sed est mundus totus? perfecta enim mundatio non in Iohannis sed in nomine domini baptisma est, si eo se dignum, qui accipit, praebeat; si autem indignum, sacramenta in eo non ad salutem sed ad perniciem permanebunt tamen. cum ergo ista quaesiturus essem, etiam ipse uidit de baptismo discipulorum domini non sibi fuisse quaerendum.

### English translation (Claude)

Then we returned to the earlier discussion, since we wished to show that neither ought we to charge them with the crimes of their people nor they us, if any such deeds of our people were found. For from the New Testament, indeed, it could not be shown that any righteous man had killed anyone; but it could be proved, by the very example of the Lord, that criminals were tolerated by the innocent. For he bore with his betrayer, who had already received his price, among the innocent with him, up to the final kiss of peace. He did not keep silent from them that a man of such great crime was among them, and yet he gave the first sacrament of his body and blood to all in common, without excluding him. When almost everyone was moved by this example, he tried to say that before the Lord's passion that communion with a criminal did not harm the apostles, because they did not yet have the baptism of Christ but the baptism of John. After he had said this, I began to ask him how, then, it was written that Jesus baptized more than John, though he himself did not baptize but his disciples, that is, he baptized through his disciples. How then did they give what they had not received, which is what these men are most accustomed to say? Or did Christ perhaps baptize with John's baptism? Then I was going to ask many things on this point: how John himself was then asked about the Lord's baptism and answered that he had the bride and was the bridegroom. Was it right, then, for the bridegroom to baptize with John's baptism, that is, the baptism of the friend or servant? Then, how could they receive the Eucharist if they were not yet baptized? Or how did he answer Peter, when he wished to be washed all over: 'He who has once been washed need not be washed again, but is wholly clean'? For perfect cleansing is baptism not in John's name but in the Lord's, if the one who receives it shows himself worthy of it; but if unworthy, the sacraments will nevertheless remain in him, not for salvation but for destruction. When I was about to ask these things, he too saw that he should not have raised the question of the baptism of the Lord's disciples.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:49: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:26: allusion, high confidence
- John 4:1: allusion, high confidence
- John 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:29: allusion, high confidence
- John 13:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 26:49; John 4:1–2; John 3:29; quotation of John 13:10 in a form fuller than the usual text. The Donatist principle that one cannot give what one has not received is in view. Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.10 (CSEL 34.2:117–118; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-10).

## Letter 44.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:118–119
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the fear of persecution by appealing to Paul's call to bear with one another and keep unity, as the prophets did.

### Latin text

Inde itum in aliud multis, ut poterant, utrimque sermocinantibus. inter quae dictum est, quod adhuc eos nostri persecuturi essent, nobisque dicebat uidere se uelle, quales nos essemus in illa persecutione praebituros, utrum consensuri essemus tali saeuitiae, an nullum commodaturi consensum. nos dicebamus deum uidere corda nostra, quae ipsi non possent, et illos temere sibi adhuc ista metuere, quae si contigerint, a malis contingere, quibus deteriores ipsi habent; nec tamen ideo nos a catholica communione segregare debere, si quid forte nobis inuitis uel etiam, si ualuerimus, contradicentibus factum fuerit, cum tolerantiam pacificam didicerimus dicente apostolo: Sufferentes inuicem in dilectione, studentes seruare unitatem spiritus in uinculo pacis. quam pacem atque tolerantiam illos non tenuisse dicebamus, qui schisma fecerunt, ut nunc inter suos, qui mitiores eorum sunt, grauiora tolerent, ne scindatur, quod scissum est, cum leuiora nollent pro ipsa unitate tolerare. dicebamus etiam nondum fuisse temporibus ueterum pacem unitatis et tolerantiam tanta commendatione praedicatam, sicut exemplo domini et noui testamenti caritate et tamen prophetas illos et sanctos uiros dicere solere in populum scelera eorum, cum tamen se ab illius populi unitate et a communione pariter accipiendorum sacramentorum, quae tunc fuerunt, diuellere non temptassent.

### English translation (Claude)

From there we passed to another subject, with many speaking on both sides as they could. Among other things it was said that our people would yet persecute them; and he said to us that he wished to see how we would conduct ourselves in that persecution, whether we would consent to such cruelty or give no consent at all. We said that God saw our hearts, which they could not; that they were rashly still afraid of such things, which, if they happened, would happen through bad men, worse than whom they themselves have among them; and yet that we ought not for that reason to separate ourselves from Catholic communion, if anything should happen against our will, or even against our protest if we were able to make it, since we have learned peaceable toleration from the apostle, who says: 'Bearing with one another in love, eager to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.' We said that those who made the schism did not keep this peace and toleration, so that now the gentler among them tolerate graver things among their own people, lest what has been torn be torn again, whereas they would not tolerate lighter things for the sake of unity itself. We also said that in the times of the ancients the peace of unity and toleration had not yet been preached with such commendation as by the Lord's example and the love of the New Testament; and yet those prophets and holy men used to denounce the people's crimes to them, though they did not try to tear themselves away from the unity of that people and from sharing in the sacraments of that time.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:2: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Eph 4:2–3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.11 (CSEL 34.2:118–119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-11).

## Letter 44.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:119–120
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that Fortunius regretted the Donatist rule of rebaptism and his people's violence, and that they agreed to a further conference of ten bishops on each side.

### Latin text

Inde nescio quo modo uentum est ad commemorationem beatae memoriae Genethlii episcopi, quod nescio quam constitutionem datam contra illos compresserit et effectum habere non siuerit. laudabant illum omnes et benignissime praeferebant. inter quas laudes a nobis subiectum est, quod etiam ipse tamen Genethlius, si in eorum manus incidisset, rebaptizandus censeretur. et haec iam stantes loquebamur, quia discedendi tempus urgueret. ibi plane ille senex dixit iam formam esse factam, ut, quisquis ad eos fidelium a nobis uenerit, baptizetur, quod eum inuitum et cum dolore dicere, quantum poterat, apparebat. sane cum etiam ipse multa mala suorum apertissime gemeret atque ostenderet, quod totius ciuitatis eius testimonio probabatur, quam esset remotus a talibus factis et, quae ipsis suis dicere soleat, modesta conquestione proferret nosque commemoraremus illud Ezechielis prophetae, ubi aperte scriptum est nec filii culpam patri nec patris culpam filio eius inputandam, ubi dictum est: Sicut enim anima patris mea est, ita et anima filii mea est; anima enim quaecumque peccauerit, sola morietur, placuit omnibus in talibus disputationibus uiolenta facta malorum hominum nobis ab inuicem obici non debere. remanebat ergo schismatis quaestio. itaque hortati eum sumus, ut etiam atque etiam placido et pacato animo adnitatur nobiscum, ut diligenti examinatione tanta inquisitio terminum sumat. ubi ille benigne cum diceret nos solum ista quaerere, nolle autem nostros haec quaeri, ea facta pollicitatione discessimus, ut exhiberemus ei plures collegas nostros certe uel decem, qui tanta beniuolentia et lenitate et tam pio studio id quaeri uellent, quantum in nobis eum iam animaduertisse atque adprobare sentiebamus. hoc etiam de suorum numero et ipse pollicitus.

### English translation (Claude)

From there, somehow, we came to mention Genethlius, a bishop of blessed memory, who had suppressed some decree issued against them and had not allowed it to take effect. All praised him and spoke of him most kindly. Amid these praises we added that even Genethlius himself, had he fallen into their hands, would have been judged to need rebaptism. We were saying this standing, since the time to leave was pressing. Then that old man said plainly that a rule had now been made that any of the faithful who came over to them from us should be baptized; and it was evident that he said this unwillingly and with grief, as far as he could. Indeed, since he himself also lamented very openly many evils of his own people and showed, as the testimony of his whole city confirmed, how far removed he was from such deeds, and related with modest complaint what he was accustomed to say to his own people; and since we mentioned that passage of the prophet Ezekiel where it is plainly written that the son's guilt is not to be charged to the father nor the father's to the son, where it is said: 'For as the soul of the father is mine, so also the soul of the son is mine; the soul that sins, it alone shall die,' all agreed that in such debates the violent deeds of bad men should not be charged by each side against the other. There remained, then, the question of the schism. So we urged him again and again to strive with us, with a calm and peaceable mind, so that so great an inquiry might come to an end by careful examination. When he said kindly that we alone sought this, but our people did not wish it, we left with the promise that we would bring him several of our colleagues, at least ten, who would wish it to be inquired into with as much goodwill, gentleness, and pious zeal as we felt he had already seen and approved in us. He too promised this concerning an equal number of his own.

### Scripture references

- Ezek 18:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 18:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Genethlius was Catholic bishop of Carthage before Aurelius. Quotation of Ezek 18:4 (cf. 18:20).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.12 (CSEL 34.2:119–120; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-12).

## Letter 44.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:120–121
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the Donatists to hold Fortunius to his promise and explains why the conversation was cut short.

### Latin text

Unde uos hortor et obtestor per domini sanguinem, ut eum promissi sui commoneatis et gnauiter instetis, ut res coepta peragatur, quam prope ad finem peruenisse iam cernitis. quantum enim arbitror, difficillime potestis inuenire in episcopis uestris tam utilem animum et uoluntatem, quam in isto sene perspeximus. postero enim die ipse ad nos uenit et haec iterum quaerere coeperamus. sed quia ordinandi episcopi necessitas nos inde iam iamque rapiebat, diutius cum illo esse nequiuimus. iam enim miseramus ad Maiorem Caelicolarum, quem audieramus noui apud eos baptismi institutorem institisse et multos illo sacrilegio seduxisse, ut cum illo, quantum ipsius temporis patiebantur angustiae, aliquid loqueremur. quem posteaquam uenturum comperit, uidens nos aliud suscepisse negotium, cum et ipsum nescio qua necessitas profectionis urgueret, benigne a nobis placideque discessit.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore I urge and adjure you by the blood of the Lord to remind him of his promise and to press him diligently that the matter begun may be carried through, which you see has almost come to its end. For, as far as I can judge, you could hardly find among your bishops so helpful a mind and will as we have seen in this old man. The next day he came to us himself, and we had begun to inquire into these things again. But because the necessity of ordaining a bishop was hurrying us away at any moment, we could not stay longer with him. For we had already sent to the Major of the Caelicolae, who we had heard had established a new baptism among them and had led many astray by that sacrilege, so that we might speak with him as far as the shortness of the time allowed. When Fortunius learned that he was coming, seeing that we had taken up other business, and since some necessity of travel was pressing him too, he left us kindly and peaceably.

### Translation notes

- The Caelicolae ('heaven-worshippers') were a sect in Africa; their leader is called 'the Major' (an elder).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.13 (CSEL 34.2:120–121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-13).

## Letter 44.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:121–122
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes a quiet conference on a jointly owned estate, with the canonical Scriptures and documents at hand.

### Latin text

Videtur autem mihi, ut turbulentas turbas et impedimentum potius quam adiumentum adferentes omnino deuitemus et uere ei animo amico atque tranquillo susceptum tam magnum negotium domino opitulante peragamus, ad aliquam uillam nos conuenire debere non magnam, ubi nullius nostrum esset ecclesia, quam tamen uillam communiter possident homines et nostrae communionis et ipsius, sicuti est uilla Titiana. siue ergo in Tubursicensi siue in Tagastensi talis locus uel ille, quem commemoraui, uel aliquis alius inuentus fuerit, faciamus codices canonicos praesto esse et, si qua proferri potuerint, ex utraque parte documenta, ut postpositis ceteris nulla, si domino placuerit, interpellante molestia, quotquot diebus potuerimus, ad hoc uacantes et unusquisque nostrum apud suum hospitem dominum deprecantes adiuuante ipso, cui pax Christiana gratissima est, rem tantam et bono animo coeptam ad inquisitionis terminum perducamus. rescribite sane, quid de hac re uel uobis uel illi uideatur.

### English translation (Claude)

It seems to me, however, that, in order wholly to avoid turbulent crowds who bring hindrance rather than help, and to carry through, with the Lord's help, so great an undertaking begun in a truly friendly and tranquil spirit, we ought to meet at some small country estate where none of us has a church, but which is owned jointly by people of our communion and of his, such as the estate of Titiana. Whether such a place is found in the territory of Thubursicum or of Thagaste, either the one I mentioned or some other, let us have the canonical books at hand and whatever documents can be produced on both sides, so that, setting everything else aside, with no trouble interrupting us, if it please the Lord, giving ourselves to this for as many days as we can, and each of us praying to the Lord at the house of his host, we may, with the help of him to whom Christian peace is most pleasing, bring so great a matter, begun with goodwill, to the end of the inquiry. Do write back what you or he think of this.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 44.14 (CSEL 34.2:121–122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-44-14).

## Letter 45.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-45-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:122
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine complain to Paulinus and Therasia of two years without a letter.

### Latin text

Nequaquam nos nescio qua uestra cessatio, qua ecce per totum biennium, ex quo nobis dulcissimi fratres Romanus et Agilis ad uos remeauerunt, nullas a uobis litteras sumpsimus, pigros ad scribendum fecit. nam cum in aliis rebus, quanto quisque amplius diligitur, tanto dignior imitatio uideatur, in hac re contra est. quo enim uos amamus ardentius, eo minus ferimus, quod nobis non scribitis, nec uos in eo uolumus imitari. ecce igitur salutamus uos si non respondentes epistulis uestris, quae nullae ad nos ueniunt, saltem expostulantes et non dolore mediocri, quamuis fortasse etiam caritas uestra similiter conqueratur, si quidem missas a uobis nostis, quae ad nos non peruenerunt, uicissimque, a nobis quae missae erant, non sunt uobis datae. quod si ita est, querelas nostras conuertamus in preces ad dominum, ne tanta solatia deneget nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

Your silence, whatever its cause, by which, for two whole years now, since our dearest brothers Romanus and Agilis returned to you, we have received no letter from you, has by no means made us slow to write. For while in other matters the more anyone is loved, the more worthy of imitation he seems, in this matter it is the opposite. The more ardently we love you, the less we bear your not writing to us, and we do not wish to imitate you in it. So we greet you, if not answering your letters, since none come to us, at least remonstrating, and with no small grief; though perhaps your Charity too complains in the same way, if indeed you know that letters were sent by you which have not reached us, and that, in turn, those sent by us were not delivered to you. If that is so, let us turn our complaints into prayers to the Lord, that he may not deny us such great comforts.

### Translation notes

- To Paulinus and Therasia, from Alypius and Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 45.1 (CSEL 34.2:122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-45-1).

## Letter 45.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-45-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:122–123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine ask for Paulinus's work against the pagans and commend the bearer of the letter.

### Latin text

Scribere te audieramus aduersum paganos. quod si absolutum est, quaesumus, ne differas mittere per perlatorem huius epistulae. carus nobis est, cuius aestimationi in regionibus nostris possumus non temere bonum testimonium perhibere. rogat per nos sanctimonium uestrum, ut eum commendare dignemini, cum quibus ei negotium est et apud quos ne bona causa eius opprimatur, timet. quid in re agatur, commodius ipse narrabit, qui etiam ad singula, quae forte animum mouerint, interrogari potest. nos gratissimum habemus et apud dominum deum nostrum sincerissimae uestrae benignitati gratias agimus, si per uestram operam de Christiani fratris securitate gaudeamus.

### English translation (Claude)

We had heard that you were writing against the pagans. If it is finished, we ask you not to delay sending it by the bearer of this letter. He is dear to us, and we can without rashness bear good witness to his reputation in our regions. He asks your Holiness through us to be good enough to commend him to those with whom he has business and before whom he fears that his good case may be overborne. What the matter is he will himself tell more conveniently, and he can be questioned on any particular points that may concern you. We will count it a very great favour, and will thank your most sincere kindness before the Lord our God, if by your efforts we may rejoice in the security of a Christian brother.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 45.2 (CSEL 34.2:122–123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-45-2).

## Letter 46.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-46-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:123–129
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Publicola, a landowner, asks Augustine eighteen questions on oaths sworn by pagan gods, food and objects connected with idols, and self-defence.

### Latin text

Scriptum est: Interroga patrem tuum et indicabit tibi, seniores tuos et dicent tibi. unde et mihi exquirendam legem de ore sacerdotis iudicaui in causa tali, quae qualis sit, per litteras expono, simul etiam ut et ego instruar in diuersis causis. singulas autem quaestiones et diuersas per capitula designari feci, ad quas singillatim dignare respondere. I. In Arzugibus, ut audiui, decurioni, qui limiti praeest, uel tribuno solent iurare barbari iurantes per daemones suos. qui ad deducendas bastagas pacti fuerint uel aliqui ad seruandas fruges ipsas, singuli possessores uel conductores solent ad custodiendas fruges suscipere quasi iam fideles epistulam decurione mittente uel singuli transeuntes, quibus necesse est per ipsos transire. mihi disceptatio in corde nata est, si ille possessor, qui susceperit barbarum, cuius fides per daemonum iurationem firma uisa est, non coinquinatur uel ipse uel illa, quae custodit, uel ille, qui deducitur a deductore barbaro. sed hoc debes scire, quia, qui iurat barbarus, a possessore pro seruandis frugibus accipiat aurum uel a uiatore deductor; sed tamen cum hac ueluti mercede, quae solet dari a possessore uel a uiatore, iuramentum etiam illud in medio est mortale datum decurioni uel tribuno. quod perturbat me, ne polluat illum, qui suscepit barbari iuramentum, uel illa, quae custodit barbarus. quacumque enim condicione etiam auro dato et obsidibus datis, ut audiui, tamen iuramentum iniquum medium intercessit. dignare mihi autem definitiue rescribere et non suspense, quod, si ipse scribas dubitanter, ego in maiores dubitationes incidere possum, quam antequam interrogassem. II. Hoc etiam audiui, quia ipsi homines conductores, qui praesunt rei meae, iuramentum per daemones suos iurantibus barbaris accipiunt pro reseruandis frugibus. si, cum illi ergo iurant per daemones suos, ut custodiant fruges, non polluunt ipsas fruges, ut, si inde manducauerit Christianus sciens uel de pretio ipsarum rerum usus fuerit, coinquinetur, significare dignare. III. Item ab alio audiui, quod conductori non iuratur a barbaro, et alter dixit, quia iuratur conductori. si etiam falsum mihi dixit ille, qui dixit iurari conductori, si iam pro hoc, quod solum audiui, non debeo uti de ipsis frugibus uel de pretio ipsarum propter auditum solum, quia dictum est: Si quis autem dixerit: Hoc immolaticium est idolis, nolite manducare propter illum? si tamen etiam haec causa similis est causae de immolaticio? quod si ita est, quid debeo de ipsis frugibus uel de pretio ipsarum facere? IV. Si debeo requirere de utroque, qui mihi dixit, quia non iuratur conductori, aut qui dixit, quia iuratur conductori, et dictum uniuscuiusque probare per testes, qui uerum dixit de illis duobus, et tam diu non contingere de ipsis frugibus uel de pretio, quam diu mihi probatum fuerit, si uerum dixit ille, qui dixit, quia non iuratur conductori? V. Si barbarus, qui per iuramentum suum iurat malum, fecerit illum Christianum conductorem uel tribunum, qui limiti praeest, iurare sibi pro fide illi seruanda pro custodiendis frugibus per ipsum iuramentum mortale, per quod ipse iurat, si solus ille Christianus coinquinatur? si non et illa, quorum causa iurat? aut si paganus, qui limiti praeest, iurauerit barbaro pro fide illi seruanda per mortale iuramentum, si non inquinat, pro quibus iurat? si quem misero ad Arzuges, si licet ei iuramentum accipere a barbaro illud mortale et si non coinquinatur, si susceperit tale iuramentum Christianus? VI. Si de area trituratoria tritici uel cuiuscumque leguminis aut torculari, de qua daemoni oblatum est, si licet inde manducare Christianum scientem? VII. De luco si licet ad aliquem usum suum Christianum scientem ligna tollere? VIII. Si quis uadens ad macellum emat carnem, quae non sit immolaticia, et cogitationes duas habuerit in corde, quod immolata sit et non sit immolata, et illam tenuerit cogitationem, qua non immolatam cogitabit, si manducauerit, si peccat? IX. Si qui bonam rem, de qua dubitat, an bona aut mala sit, faciat, cum putat bonam, cum tamen putasset et malam, si peccatum adscribatur ei? X. Si quis dixerit, quod immolaticium est, mentiens et postea dixerit iterum, quia mentitus est, et ad fidem uere mentitus est, si licet Christianum inde manducare aut uendere et de pretio uti ex eo, quod audiuit? XI. Si Christianus aliquis ambulans passus necessitatem uictus fame unius diei uel bidui uel multorum dierum, ut iam durare non possit, ita occurrerit, ut in ipsa necessitate famis, in qua sibi uidet iam mortem proximare, inuenerit cibum in idolio positum, ubi nullus sit hominum, et non possit inuenire alium cibum, debet mori aut exinde cibari? XII. Si Christianus uideat se a barbaro uel a Romano uelle interfici, debet eos ipse Christianus interficere, ne ab illis interficiatur? uel si licet sine interfectione eos inpugnare uel repellere, quia dictum est: Non resistere malo? XIII. Si murum possessioni debet Christianus facere propter hostem et si ille Christianus, qui fecerit murum, causa non existit homicidii, cum inde aliqui coeperint pugnare et interficere hostes? XIV. Si licet de fonte bibere uel de puteo, ubi de sacrificio aliquid missum est? si de puteo, quod in templo est et desertum factum est, debet inde Christianus bibere? si in templo, quod colitur, idoli puteus ibi sit uel fons et nihil ibi factum sit in eodem puteo uel fonte, si debet haurire aquam inde Christianus et bibere? XV. Si Christianus debet in balneis lauare uel in thermis, in quibus sacrificatur simulacris? si Christianus debet in balneis, quibus in die festo suo pagani loti sunt, lauare siue cum ipsis siue sine ipsis? XVI. Si in solio, ubi descenderunt pagani ab idolis uenientes in die festo suo et aliquid illic in solio sacrilegii sui fecerint et scierit Christianus, si debet in eodem solio descendere? XVII. Si Christianus inuitatus ab aliquo adpositam habuerit carnem in escam, de qua dictum fuerit illi, quia immolaticia est, et non manducauerit eam; postea autem ad aliquem translatam ipsam carnem aliquo casu inuenerit uenalem et emerit eam aut adpositam habuerit ab aliquo alio inuitatus et non cognouerit eam et manducauerit, si peccat? XVIII. Si de horto uel de possessione idolorum uel sacerdotum eorum debet Christianus sciens holus emere uel aliquem fructum et inde edere? Sane de iuramento uel de idolis, ut laborem non patiaris in requirendo, quae dominus donauit, ut inuenerimus, ante oculos tuos uolui proponere; si quid autem aliud apertius aut melius in scripturis inueneris, dignare mihi significare. unde, quae inuenimus, haec sunt, ubi Laban dixit ad Iacob: Deus Abraham et deus Nachor, quem autem deum, non significauit scriptura; et iterum Abimelech quando uenit ad Isaac, ubi iurauit uel qui cum illo erant, sed quale iuramentum, non significauit scriptura; iterum de idolis, ubi ad Gedeon dictum est a domino in libro iudicum, ut de uitulo, quem occiderat, holocaustum faceret; et in Iesu Naue de Hiericho, ut omne aurum, argentum et aeramentum inferretur in thesauris domini, et sanctum uocatum est de ciuitate, quae anathema est; et quid est illud, quod in Deuteronomio positum est: Non inferes abominationem in domum tuam et anathema eris, sicut hoc ipsum est? Dominus te seruet; saluto te; ora pro me.

### English translation (Claude)

It is written: 'Ask your father, and he will tell you; your elders, and they will say to you.' Therefore I too have judged that I should seek the law from the mouth of the priest in a case of this kind, which I set out by letter, and at the same time that I may be instructed in various cases. I have had the individual and different questions marked off by headings; please answer them one by one. I. In Arzugis, as I have heard, the barbarians are accustomed to swear to the decurion who commands the frontier, or to the tribune, swearing by their demons. Those who have contracted to escort baggage-trains, or some to guard the crops themselves, are received by the individual landowners or tenants to guard the crops, as already trustworthy, when the decurion sends a letter; or by individual travellers who must pass through their territory. A debate has arisen in my heart whether the landowner who has received a barbarian whose good faith seemed confirmed by an oath by demons is not defiled, either he himself or the things he guards, or the traveller who is escorted by the barbarian guide. But you should know this, that the barbarian who swears receives gold from the landowner for guarding the crops, or the guide from the traveller; yet along with this as it were payment, which is usually given by the landowner or the traveller, there is also in between that deadly oath given to the decurion or the tribune. This troubles me, lest it pollute the one who has accepted the barbarian's oath, or the things the barbarian guards. For on whatever terms, even when gold has been given and hostages given, as I have heard, still the wicked oath has come in between. Please write back to me definitely and not doubtfully, for if you yourself write hesitantly, I may fall into greater doubts than before I asked. II. I have also heard that the tenants themselves who manage my property accept an oath from barbarians swearing by their demons to guard the crops. If, then, when they swear by their demons to guard the crops, they do not pollute the crops themselves, so that a Christian who knowingly eats of them or uses the price of those goods is defiled, please let me know. III. Again, I have heard from one man that no oath is sworn to the tenant by the barbarian, and another said that an oath is sworn to the tenant. If the man who said an oath is sworn to the tenant told me a falsehood, ought I not, merely because of what I have heard, to use those crops or their price, because it is said, 'But if anyone says, This has been sacrificed to idols, do not eat, for his sake'? If, indeed, this case is like the case of things sacrificed? If so, what ought I to do with the crops themselves or their price? IV. Ought I to make inquiry of both, the one who told me no oath is sworn to the tenant and the one who said an oath is sworn, and prove by witnesses the statement of each, which of the two told the truth, and not touch the crops or their price until it has been proved to me that the one who said no oath is sworn to the tenant told the truth? V. If the barbarian, who swears an evil oath by his own oath, has made the Christian tenant, or the tribune who commands the frontier, swear to him, to keep faith with him in guarding the crops, by the same deadly oath by which he himself swears, is the Christian alone defiled, and not also the things for whose sake he swears? Or if a pagan who commands the frontier has sworn to the barbarian by a deadly oath to keep faith with him, does he not defile the things for which he swears? If I send someone to Arzugis, may he accept that deadly oath from the barbarian, and is a Christian not defiled if he accepts such an oath? VI. From a threshing floor of wheat or of any other crop, or from a wine-press, from which an offering has been made to a demon, may a Christian knowingly eat? VII. May a Christian knowingly take wood from a sacred grove for some use of his own? VIII. If someone going to the market buys meat which has not been sacrificed, and has two thoughts in his heart, that it has been sacrificed and that it has not, and holds to the thought by which he thinks it not sacrificed, does he sin if he eats it? IX. If someone does a good thing about which he doubts whether it is good or bad, when he thinks it good, though he had also thought it bad, is sin imputed to him? X. If someone says, lying, that something has been sacrificed, and afterwards says again that he lied, and truly did lie, may a Christian eat of it or sell it and use the price, after what he has heard? XI. If some Christian on a journey, suffering want, overcome by hunger for one day or two or many days, so that he can no longer endure, comes upon food placed in an idol's temple, where no one is present, in the very extremity of hunger, when he sees death approaching, and can find no other food, ought he to die or to eat of it? XII. If a Christian sees that a barbarian or a Roman wishes to kill him, ought the Christian himself to kill them so as not to be killed by them? Or may he fight them off or repel them without killing, since it is said, 'Do not resist evil'? XIII. Ought a Christian to build a wall for a property because of the enemy; and is the Christian who has built the wall not a cause of homicide, when some begin to fight from it and kill enemies? XIV. May one drink from a spring or a well into which something from a sacrifice has been put? If from a well that is in a temple which has become deserted, ought a Christian to drink from it? If in a temple where worship is carried on there is an idol's well or spring, and nothing has been done in that well or spring, ought a Christian to draw water from it and drink? XV. Ought a Christian to wash in baths or hot baths in which sacrifice is offered to images? Ought a Christian to wash in baths in which pagans have washed on their festival day, whether with them or without them? XVI. If, in a bathing-tub into which pagans coming from their idols on their festival day have gone down and performed some act of their sacrilege there in the tub, and a Christian knows it, ought he to go down into the same tub? XVII. If a Christian, invited by someone, has had meat set before him to eat, of which he has been told that it was sacrificed, and has not eaten it; but afterwards, the same meat having passed to someone else, he by some chance finds it on sale and buys it, or has it set before him when invited by someone else and does not recognize it and eats it, does he sin? XVIII. Ought a Christian knowingly to buy vegetables or any fruit from a garden or estate belonging to idols or their priests, and eat of it? Indeed, concerning oaths and idols, so that you may not have the labour of searching, I have wished to set before your eyes what the Lord has granted us to find; but if you find anything else clearer or better in the Scriptures, please let me know. What we found, then, is this: where Laban said to Jacob, 'The God of Abraham and the God of Nahor'; but which god, Scripture did not indicate; and again when Abimelech came to Isaac, where he or those with him swore, but what kind of oath Scripture did not indicate; again concerning idols, where the Lord told Gideon in the book of Judges to make a burnt offering of the calf he had killed; and in Joshua son of Nun concerning Jericho, that all the gold, silver, and bronze should be brought into the treasuries of the Lord, and it was called holy, from a city which was under the ban; and what is that which is written in Deuteronomy: 'You shall not bring an abomination into your house, and you will be under the ban, as it is'? The Lord keep you; I greet you; pray for me.

### Scripture references

- Deut 32:7: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 2:7: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 10:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:39: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 31:53: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 26:31: allusion, high confidence
- Judg 6:26: allusion, high confidence
- Josh 6:19: allusion, high confidence
- Deut 7:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter from Publicola to Augustine. Quotations of Deut 32:7; 1 Cor 10:28; Matt 5:39; Deut 7:26; allusions to Gen 31:53; Gen 26:26–31; Judg 6:25–26; Josh 6:19. Arzugis was a frontier district of Tripolitania. 'From the mouth of the priest' echoes Mal 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 46.1 (CSEL 34.2:123–129; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/44-1/#p-46-1).

## Letter 47.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:129–130
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his reply to Publicola, warning that he cannot guarantee to remove his doubts.

### Latin text

Aestus animi tui postea quam didici litteris tuis, etiam mei continuo facti sunt, non quo me omnia talia permouerent, qualibus te indicasti esse permotum, sed quo modo tibi auferrentur hi aestus, fateor, aestuaui, maxime quia petis, ut definitiue tibi rescriberem, ne in maiores dubitationes incideres, quam antequam interrogasses. hoc enim uideo non esse in mea potestate. nam quo modo libet scripsero, quae mihi uidentur esse certissima, si tibi non persuasero, procul dubio eris incertior. non autem sicut mihi adiacet suadere, eo modo adiacet etiam persuadere cuilibet. uerum tamen ne tuae dilectioni negarem operulam meam, post aliquantam deliberationem rescribendum putaui.

### English translation (Claude)

Once I learned from your letter of the agitation of your mind, it at once became mine too; not that I was disturbed by all such things as you said had disturbed you, but I confess that I was agitated about how this agitation might be taken from you, especially since you ask me to write back definitely, lest you fall into greater doubts than before you asked. For I see that this is not in my power. However I write what seem to me most certain things, if I do not persuade you, you will no doubt be more uncertain. But it is not in my power to persuade anyone in the same way as it is to advise. Nevertheless, so as not to refuse your Affection my small service, after some deliberation I thought I should reply.

### Translation notes

- Reply to Publicola (Letter 46).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.1 (CSEL 34.2:129–130; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-1).

## Letter 47.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:130–132
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that using the good faith of someone who swore by false gods is not a share in his sin, and that oaths are forbidden to guard against perjury.

### Latin text

Mouet te certe, utrum eius fide utendum sit, qui, ut eam seruet, per daemonia iurauerit. ubi te uolo prius considerare, utrum, si quispiam per deos falsos iurauerit se fidem seruaturum et eam non seruauerit, non tibi uideatur bis peccasse. si enim tali iuratione promissam custodiret fidem, ideo tantum peccasse iudicaretur, quia per tales deos iurauit; illud autem nemo recte reprehenderet, quia fidem seruauit. nunc uero, quia et iurauit, per quos non debuit, et contra pollicitam fidem fecit, quod non debuit, bis utique peccauit; ac per hoc, qui utitur fide illius, quem constat iurasse per deos falsos, et utitur non ad malam sed ad licitam et bonam rem, non peccato eius se sociat, quo per daemonia iurauit, sed bono pacto eius, quo fidem seruauit. neque hic eam fidem dico seruari, qua fideles uocantur, qui baptizantur in Christo. illa enim longe alia est longeque discreta a fide humanorum placitorum atque pactorum. uerum tamen sine ulla dubitatione minus malum est per deum falsum iurare ueraciter quam per deum uerum fallaciter. quanto enim, per quod iuratur, magis est sanctum, tanto magis est poenale periurium. alia ergo quaestio est, utrum non peccet, qui per falsos deos sibi iurari fecit, quoniam ille, qui ei iurat, deos falsos colit. cui quaestioni possunt illa testimonia suffragari, quae ipse commemorasti de Laban et Abimelech, si tamen Abimelech per deos suos iurauit sicut Laban per deum Nachor. haec, ut dixi, alia quaestio est, quae me merito fortassis moueret, nisi illa exempla occurrissent de Isaac et Iacob et si qua alia possunt inueniri, si tamen illud non adhuc mouet, quod in nouo testamento dictum est, ne omnino iuremus. quod mihi quidem propterea dictum uidetur, non quia uerum iurare peccatum est, sed quia periurare immane peccatum est, a quo nos longe esse uoluit, qui omni modo ne iuremus admonuit. sed tibi aliud uideri scio, unde nunc disputandum non est, ut illud potius agamus, unde me consulendum putasti. proinde sicut non iuras, ita nec alium, si hoc placet, iurare compellas, quamuis dictum sit, ne iuremus, nusquam autem in scripturis sanctis legi meminerim, ne ab alio iurationem accipiamus. alia uero quaestio est, utrum ea pace debeamus uti, quae inter alios inuicem iurantes facta est. quod si noluerimus, ubi uiuamus in terris, nescio utrum inuenire possimus. neque enim tantum modo limiti sed uniuersis prouinciis pax conciliatur iuratione barbarica. unde et illud sequetur, ut non fruges tantum, quae ab eis custodiuntur, qui per deos falsos iurauerunt, sed ubique inquinata sint omnia, quae ipsa pace muniuntur, quam iuratio illa confirmat. quod si absurdissimum est dicere, nec illa te moueant, quae mouebant.

### English translation (Claude)

What troubles you, surely, is whether one may make use of the good faith of a man who has sworn by demons that he will keep it. Here I want you first to consider whether, if someone swore by false gods that he would keep faith and did not keep it, he would not seem to you to have sinned twice. For if he kept the faith promised by such an oath, he would be judged to have sinned only in swearing by such gods; but no one would rightly blame him for keeping faith. As it is, since he both swore by those by whom he ought not and acted against his promised faith, which he ought not, he has certainly sinned twice. And so one who makes use of the good faith of a man known to have sworn by false gods, and makes use of it not for an evil but for a lawful and good purpose, does not associate himself with his sin of swearing by demons, but with his good agreement by which he kept faith. Nor do I mean here the faith by which those who are baptized in Christ are called the faithful; for that is something far different and far removed from the faith of human agreements and compacts. Yet without any doubt it is a lesser evil to swear truly by a false god than falsely by the true God. For the holier that by which one swears, the more punishable the perjury. It is another question, then, whether one does not sin who has someone swear to him by false gods, since the one who swears to him worships false gods. To this question the testimonies you yourself mentioned of Laban and Abimelech can lend support, if indeed Abimelech swore by his gods as Laban did by the god of Nahor. This, as I said, is another question, which might perhaps rightly trouble me if those examples of Isaac and Jacob, and any others that can be found, had not occurred to me; unless perhaps what still troubles you is that it was said in the New Testament that we should not swear at all. This seems to me to have been said not because swearing truly is a sin, but because perjury is a monstrous sin, from which he wished us to be far removed who warned us not to swear at all. But I know that you think otherwise, so this is not to be argued now, so that we may rather deal with what you thought you should consult me about. Accordingly, just as you do not swear, so neither compel another to swear, if you think fit; although it is said that we should not swear, I do not remember reading anywhere in the holy Scriptures that we should not accept an oath from another. But it is another question whether we ought to enjoy the peace made between others who swear to one another. If we refuse, I do not know whether we could find anywhere on earth to live. For peace is secured by barbarian oaths not only for the frontier but for whole provinces. From that it would follow that not only the crops guarded by those who have sworn by false gods, but everything everywhere protected by the peace which that oath confirms, would be defiled. If that is utterly absurd to say, let the things that troubled you trouble you no longer.

### Scripture references

- Gen 31:53: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 26:31: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:34: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Gen 31:53 and Gen 26:28–31; Matt 5:34 (cf. Jas 5:12).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.2 (CSEL 34.2:130–132; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-2).

## Letter 47.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:132–133
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that produce, water, and baths are not defiled by pagan offerings, and that spoils of destroyed temples may be put to common or sacred use but not taken for private gain.

### Latin text

Item si de area uel torculari tollatur aliquid ad sacrificia daemoniorum sciente Christiano, ideo peccat, si fieri permittit, ubi prohibendi potestas est. quod si factum comperit aut prohibendi potestatem non habuit, utitur mundis reliquis fructibus, unde illa sublata sunt, sicut fontibus utimur, de quibus hauriri aquam ad usum sacrificiorum certissime scimus. eadem est etiam ratio lauacrorum. neque enim spiritum deducere de aere dubitamus, in quem scimus ire fumum ex aris omnibus et incensis daemoniorum. unde apparet illud esse prohibitum, ne in honorem alienorum deorum aliqua re utamur aut uti existimemur sic eam accipiendo, ut, quamuis animo contemnamus, eos tamen, qui nostrum animum ignorant, ad haec honoranda aedificemus. et cum templa, idola, luci et si quid huius modi data potestate euertuntur, quamuis manifestum est, cum id agimus, non ea nos honorare, sed potius detestari, ideo tamen in usus nostros priuatos dum taxat et proprios non debemus inde aliquid usurpare, ut appareat nos pietate ista destruere, non auaritia. cum uero in usus communes, non proprios ac priuatos, uel in honorem dei ueri conuertuntur, hoc de illis fit, quod de ipsis hominibus, cum ex sacrilegis et impiis in ueram religionem mutantur. hoc deus intellegitur docuisse illis testimoniis, quae ipse posuisti, cum de luco alienorum deorum iussit ligna ad holocaustum adhiberi et de Hiericho, ut omne aurum, argentum et aeramentum inferretur in thesauros domini. quapropter etiam illud, quod in Deuteronomio scriptum est: Non concupisces argentum uel aurum illorum nec accipies inde tibi, ne excedas propter illud, quoniam abominatio est domino deo tuo; et non conferes execramentum in domum tuam et eris anathema, sicut et illud est, et offensione offendes et coinquinatione inquinaberis abominatione illa, quia anathema est. satis apparet aut ipsos priuatos usus in talibus esse prohibitos aut, ne sic inde aliquid inferatur in domum, ut honoretur; tunc est enim abominatio et execratio, non cum in talibus sacrilegus honor apertissima destructione subuertitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise, if something is taken from a threshing floor or wine-press for sacrifices to demons with a Christian's knowledge, he sins if he allows it to be done where he has the power to prevent it. If he learns that it has been done, or did not have the power to prevent it, he uses the rest of the produce, from which those things were taken, as clean, just as we use springs from which we know for certain that water is drawn for use in sacrifices. The same reasoning applies to baths. For we do not hesitate to draw breath from the air into which we know the smoke goes from all the altars and incense of demons. From this it appears that what is forbidden is that we should use anything in honour of alien gods, or be thought to use it, by accepting it in such a way that, though we despise them in our mind, we nevertheless lead on to honour these things those who do not know our mind. And when temples, idols, groves, and anything of the kind are overthrown by permission granted, although it is plain that when we do this we do not honour but rather detest them, we nevertheless ought not to take anything from them for our private and personal uses, so that it may be evident that we destroy them out of piety, not avarice. But when they are turned to common uses, not personal and private, or to the honour of the true God, the same is done with them as with men themselves when they are changed from sacrilegious and ungodly into the true religion. This is what God is understood to have taught by those testimonies which you yourself cited, when he commanded wood from the grove of alien gods to be used for a burnt offering, and that all the gold, silver, and bronze of Jericho should be brought into the treasuries of the Lord. Hence also what is written in Deuteronomy: 'You shall not covet their silver or gold, nor take any of it for yourself, lest you go astray because of it, for it is an abomination to the Lord your God; and you shall not bring an accursed thing into your house and become accursed like it; you shall surely be offended and surely defiled by that abomination, because it is accursed.' It is clear enough that either private uses of such things are forbidden, or bringing anything from them into the house in such a way that it is honoured. For then it is an abomination and an accursed thing; not when, in such things, sacrilegious honour is overthrown by the plainest destruction.

### Scripture references

- Judg 6:26: allusion, high confidence
- Josh 6:19: allusion, high confidence
- Deut 7:25: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 7:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Judg 6:26; Josh 6:19; quotation of Deut 7:25–26 in Augustine's Latin. 'By permission granted' refers to imperial authority to destroy temples.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.3 (CSEL 34.2:132–133; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-3).

## Letter 47.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:133–135
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the questions on food offered to idols, temple produce and wells, and on acting with an uncertain conscience.

### Latin text

De escis autem idolorum nihil amplius nos debere obseruare, quam quod praecepit apostolus, certus esto. et ideo de hac re uerba eius recole, quae si obscura essent, pro modulo nostro exponeremus. non autem peccat, qui cibum postea nesciens manducauerit, quem prius tamquam idolothytum respuit. holus uel quilibet fructus in quolibet agro natus eius est, qui creauit, quia domini est terra et plenitudo eius et omnis creatura dei bona est. sed si illud, quod in agris nascitur, consecratur idolo uel sacrificatur, tunc inter idolothyta deputandum est. cauendum est enim, ne, si putauerimus non uescendum holere, quod nascitur in horto templi idoli, consequens sit, ut existimemus non debuisse apostolos apud Athenas cibum sumere, quia ciuitas erat Mineruae eiusque numini consecrata. hoc et de puteo responderim uel fonte, qui in templo est. plus autem mouet re uera, si aliquid sacrificiorum in fontem uel puteum proiciatur. sed eadem ratio est aeris, qui omnem eum fumum recipit, de quo supra diximus, aut, si hoc ideo putatur distare, quia illud sacrificium, de quo fumus aeri confunditur, non fit ipsi aeri sed idolo alicui uel daemonio, aliquando autem sic mittuntur sacrificia in aquas, ut ipsis aquis sacrificetur, non ideo utique solis huius luce non utimur, quia ei sacrilegi, ubi possunt, sacrificare non cessant. sacrificatur etiam uentis, quibus tamen utimur ad tantas nostras commoditates, cum eorundem sacrificiorum fumum ipsi quodam modo haurire et uorare uideantur. si quis dubitat de aliqua carne, utrum immolaticia sit, et non est immolaticia, si eam cogitationem tenuerit, quod immolaticia non sit, et ea uescatur, non utique peccat, quia nec est nec iam putatur immolaticia, etsi antea putabatur. neque enim non licet corrigere cogitationes a falsitate in ueritatem. si quis autem bonum putauerit esse, quod malum est, et fecerit, hoc putando utique peccat. et ea sunt omnia peccata ignorantiae, quando quisque bene fieri putat, quod male fit.

### English translation (Claude)

As for food offered to idols, be assured that we ought to observe nothing more than what the apostle commanded. So recall his words on this matter; if they were obscure we would explain them as far as we are able. One who afterwards unknowingly eats food which he earlier refused as offered to idols does not sin. Vegetables or any fruit growing in any field belong to him who created them, because the earth is the Lord's and its fullness, and every creature of God is good. But if what grows in the fields is consecrated to an idol or sacrificed, then it is to be counted among things offered to idols. For we must beware lest, if we thought that vegetables growing in the garden of an idol's temple should not be eaten, it should follow that we should think the apostles ought not to have taken food at Athens, because the city belonged to Minerva and was consecrated to her divinity. I would answer the same about a well or spring that is in a temple. It is indeed more troubling if something from the sacrifices is thrown into a spring or well. But the same reasoning applies to the air, which receives all that smoke of which we spoke above. Or, if this is thought to differ because the sacrifice whose smoke mingles with the air is offered not to the air itself but to some idol or demon, whereas sacrifices are sometimes thrown into waters so that the waters themselves receive the sacrifice: we certainly do not refrain from using the light of this sun because sacrilegious men do not cease to sacrifice to it wherever they can. Sacrifice is also offered to the winds, which we nevertheless use for so many of our conveniences, though they seem in a way to drink in and devour the smoke of those same sacrifices. If someone doubts whether some meat has been sacrificed, and it has not, and he holds to the thought that it has not and eats it, he certainly does not sin, because it neither is nor is any longer thought to be sacrificed, even if it was thought so before. For it is not forbidden to correct one's thoughts from falsehood to truth. But if someone thinks that what is bad is good and does it, he certainly sins in thinking so. And all these are sins of ignorance, when someone thinks that what is done badly is done well.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 10:25: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 24:1 (23:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:26: quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 17:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The apostle's rule: 1 Cor 8 and 10. Quotations of Ps 24:1 (23:1 LXX/Vulg.; also 1 Cor 10:26) and 1 Tim 4:4. Athens as Minerva's city alludes to Acts 17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.4 (CSEL 34.2:133–135; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-4).

## Letter 47.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:135–136
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects killing in self-defence except for soldiers and officials acting for others, and holds that one is not guilty of harm arising from lawful things such as a wall.

### Latin text

De occidendis hominibus, ne ab eis quisque occidatur, non mihi placet consilium, nisi forte sit miles aut publica functione teneatur, ut non pro se hoc faciat sed pro aliis uel pro ciuitate, ubi etiam ipse est, accepta legitima potestate, si eius congruit personae. qui uero repelluntur aliquo terrore, ne male faciant, etiam ipsis aliquid fortasse praestatur. hinc autem dictum est: Non resistamus malo, ne nos uindicta delectet, quae alieno malo animum pascit, non ut correctionem hominum neglegamus. unde nec reus est mortis alienae, qui cum suae possessioni...... et murum circumduxerit, aliquis ex ipsorum usu percussus intereat. neque enim reus est Christianus, si bos eius aliquem feriendo uel equus calcem iaciendo aliquem occidat, aut ideo non debent Christiani boues habere cornua aut equus ungulas aut dentes canis aut uero, quoniam Paulus apostolus satis egit, ut in tribuni notitiam perferretur insidias sibi a quibusdam perditis praeparari, et ob hoc deductores accepit armatos, si in illa arma scelerati homines incidissent, Paulus in effusione sanguinis eorum suum crimen agnosceret. absit, ut ea, quae propter bonum ac licitum facimus aut habemus, si quid per haec praeter nostram uoluntatem cuiquam mali acciderit, nobis inputetur. alioquin nec ferramenta domestica et agrestia sunt habenda, ne quis eis uel se uel alterum interimat, nec arbor aut restis, ne quis se inde suspendat, nec fenestra facienda est, ne per hanc se quisque praecipitet. quid plura commemorem, cum ea commemorando finire non possim? quid enim est in usu hominum bono ac licito, unde non possit etiam pernicies inrogari?

### English translation (Claude)

As for killing men so as not to be killed by them, I do not approve of this counsel, unless perhaps one is a soldier or bound by public office, so that he does it not for himself but for others, or for the city where he too lives, having received lawful authority, if it befits his position. Those who are driven back by some fear from doing evil are perhaps even being done some good. But the saying 'Let us not resist evil' was spoken so that revenge, which feeds the mind on another's harm, may not delight us; not so that we may neglect the correction of men. Hence neither is a man guilty of another's death who has built a wall around his property, if someone perishes, struck in the course of its use. For a Christian is not guilty if his ox kills someone by goring or his horse by kicking; or else Christians ought not to have oxen with horns, or horses with hooves, or dogs with teeth. Or indeed, since the apostle Paul took care that the plot being prepared against him by certain abandoned men should be brought to the tribune's notice, and on that account received an armed escort, if those criminals had fallen upon those arms, would Paul have recognized the shedding of their blood as his own crime? Far be it that what we do or have for a good and lawful purpose should be imputed to us, if through it some harm befalls anyone against our will. Otherwise we should have no household or farm tools, lest someone kill himself or another with them; no tree or rope, lest someone hang himself from it; no window should be made, lest someone throw himself out through it. Why should I mention more, when I could not finish mentioning them? For what is there in good and lawful human use from which destruction cannot also be brought?

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:39: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 23:16: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 23:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 5:39; allusion to Acts 23:12–24. The Latin of the sentence about the wall is defective in the digital text (marked by dots); it is translated by the evident sense. The final 'r' in the digital text is read as a question mark.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.5 (CSEL 34.2:135–136; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-5).

## Letter 47.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:136–137
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers that a starving traveller should refuse food known to be offered to an idol but may eat it if this is unknown.

### Latin text

Restat, ni fallor, ut dicamus aliquid de illo uiatore Christiano, quem commemorasti uictum famis necessitate, si nihil uspiam inuenerit nisi cibum in idolio positum, ubi alius nullus est hominum, utrum ei satius sit fame emori, quam illud in alimentum sumere. in qua quaestione quoniam non est consequens, ut cibus ille idolothytum sit, potuit enim uel ab eis, qui ibi ab itinere deuertentes corpus refecerant, obliuione seu uoluntate dimitti uel illic ob aliam causam quamlibet poni, breuiter respondeo. aut certum est esse idolothytum aut certum est non esse aut ignoratur. si ergo certum est esse, melius Christiana uirtute respuitur; si autem uel non esse scitur uel ignoratur, sine ullo conscientiae scrupulo in usum necessitatis adsumitur.

### English translation (Claude)

It remains, unless I am mistaken, for us to say something about that Christian traveller whom you mentioned, overcome by the necessity of hunger: if he finds nothing anywhere but food placed in an idol's temple, where no other person is, whether it is better for him to die of hunger than to take it as nourishment. In this question, since it does not follow that that food was offered to an idol (for it could have been left, by forgetfulness or on purpose, by people who had turned aside there from their journey to refresh themselves, or placed there for some other reason), I answer briefly. Either it is certain that it was offered to an idol, or it is certain that it was not, or it is unknown. If it is certain that it was, it is better refused with Christian courage; but if it is known that it was not, or it is unknown, it may be taken for necessity without any scruple of conscience.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 47.6 (CSEL 34.2:136–137; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-47-6).

## Letter 48.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:137–138
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the monks of Capraria for their prayers, since secular business presses heavily on him as bishop.

### Latin text

Quando quietem uestram cogitamus, quam habetis in Christo, etiam nos, quamuis in laboribus uariis asperisque uersemur, in uestra caritate requiescimus. unum enim corpus sub uno capite sumus, ut et uos in nobis negotiosi et nos in nobis otiosi simus, quia, si patitur unum membrum, compatiuntur omnia membra et, si glorificatur unum membrum, congaudent omnia membra. admonemus ergo et petimus et obsecramus per Christi altissimam humilitatem et misericordissimam celsitudinem, ut nostri memores sitis in sanctis orationibus uestris, quas uos uigilantiores et magis sobrias habere credimus; nostras enim saepe sauciat et debilitat caligo et tumultus saecularium actionum. quas etsi nostras non habemus, eorum tamen, qui nos angariant mille passus et iubemur ire cum eis alia duo, tanta nobis ingeruntur, ut uix respirare possimus credentes tamen, quod ille, in cuius conspectu intrat gemitus compeditorum, perseuerantes nos in eo ministerio, in quo conlocare dignatus est cum promissa mercede, adiuuantibus orationibus uestris ab omni angustia liberabit.

### English translation (Claude)

When we think of the quiet which you have in Christ, we too, though we are engaged in various and harsh labours, rest in your love. For we are one body under one head, so that you are busy in us and we are at leisure in you; because if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it, and if one member is honoured, all the members rejoice with it. We therefore admonish, ask, and beseech you, by the most lofty humility and most merciful loftiness of Christ, to remember us in your holy prayers, which we believe you offer with more wakefulness and sobriety; for ours are often wounded and weakened by the darkness and tumult of secular business. Though this business is not our own, yet so much is heaped on us by those who press us to go a mile with them, and we are commanded to go with them another two, that we can scarcely breathe; trusting, however, that he before whom the groaning of the prisoners comes will, with the help of your prayers, free us from all distress if we persevere in the ministry in which he has deigned to place us, with the reward he has promised.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 12:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:41: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 79:11 (78:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Eudoxius, abbot of the monastery on the island of Capraria, and his monks. Quotations or allusions: 1 Cor 12:26; Matt 5:41 (Augustine's 'another two' is his own extension); Ps 79:11 (78:11 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 48.1 (CSEL 34.2:137–138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-1).

## Letter 48.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:138–139
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the monks to persevere, not to refuse service to the church out of love of leisure, and to avoid both pride and sloth.

### Latin text

Vos autem, fratres, exhortamur in domino, ut propositum uestrum custodiatis et usque in finem perseueretis ac, si qua opera uestra mater ecclesia desiderauerit, nec elatione auida suscipiatis nec blandiente desidia respuatis, sed miti corde obtemperetis deo cum mansuetudine portantes eum, qui uos regit, qui dirigit mites in iudicio, docebit mansuetos uias suas. nec uestrum otium necessitatibus ecclesiae praeponatis, cui parturienti si nulli boni ministrare uellent, quo modo nasceremini, non inueniretis. sicut autem inter ignem et aquam tenenda est uia, ut nec exuratur homo nec demergatur, sic inter apicem superbiae et uoraginem desidiae iter nostrum temperare debemus, sicut scriptum est: Non declinantes neque ad dexteram neque ad sinistram. sunt enim, qui, dum nimis timent, ne quasi in dexteram rapti extollantur, in sinistram lapsi demerguntur, et sunt rursus, qui, dum nimis se auferunt a sinistra, ne torpida uacationis mollitia sorbeantur, ex altera parte iactantiae fastu corrupti atque consumpti in fumum fauillamque uanescunt. sic ergo, dilectissimi, diligite otium, ut uos ab omni terrena delectatione refrenetis et memineritis nullum locum esse, ubi non possit laqueos tendere, qui timet, ne reuolemus ad deum et inimicum omnium bonorum, cuius captiui fuimus, iudicemus, nullamque esse nobis perfectam requiem cogitetis, donec transeat iniquitas et in iudicium iustitia conuertatur.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, brothers, we exhort in the Lord to keep your resolve and persevere to the end; and if mother church should desire any work of yours, neither to take it up with eager pride nor to refuse it from flattering sloth, but to obey God with a gentle heart, bearing with meekness him who rules you, who guides the meek in judgement and will teach the gentle his ways. Nor prefer your own leisure to the needs of the church; for if no good men were willing to serve her when she was in labour, you would not have found how to be born. And just as a path must be kept between fire and water, so that a man is neither burned nor drowned, so we must steer our course between the peak of pride and the whirlpool of sloth, as it is written: 'Turning aside neither to the right hand nor to the left.' For there are some who, while fearing too much to be swept off as it were to the right and lifted up, slip to the left and are drowned; and again there are some who, while withdrawing too far from the left lest they be swallowed by the sluggish softness of idleness, on the other side are corrupted and consumed by the arrogance of boasting and vanish into smoke and ashes. So, dearly beloved, love leisure in such a way that you restrain yourselves from all earthly delight, and remember that there is no place where he cannot set snares who fears that we may fly back to God, and who is the enemy of all good, whose captives we were; and think that there is no perfect rest for us until iniquity passes away and justice is turned into judgement.

### Scripture references

- Ps 25:9 (24:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 4:27: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 57:1 (56:2 LXX): allusion, low confidence
- Ps 94:15 (93:15 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Ps 25:9 (24:9 LXX/Vulg.); Prov 4:27 or Deut 5:32; Ps 57:1 (56:2 LXX/Vulg.); Ps 94:15 (93:15 LXX/Vulg.). The call to serve the church when asked refers to monks being ordained clergy.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 48.2 (CSEL 34.2:138–139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-2).

## Letter 48.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:139
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the monks to do all their works, prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and mutual forbearance, for the glory of God.

### Latin text

Item cum aliquid strenue atque alacriter agitis et inpigre operamini siue in orationibus siue in ieiuniis siue in elemosynis uel tribuentes aliquid indigentibus uel donantes iniurias, sicut et deus in Christo donauit nobis, siue edomantes perniciosas consuetudines castigantesque corpus et seruituti subicientes siue sufferentes tribulationem et ante omnia uos ipsos inuicem in dilectionem — quid enim sufferat, qui fratrem non suffert? - siue prospicientes astutiam atque insidias temptatoris et scuto fidei iacula eius ignita repellentes et extinguentes siue cantantes et psallentes in cordibus uestris domino uel uocibus a corde non dissonis: omnia in gloriam dei facite, qui operatur omnia in omnibus, atque ita feruentes spiritu, ut in domino laudetur anima uestra. ipsa est enim actio recti itineris, quae oculos semper habet ad dominum, quoniam ipse euellet de laqueo pedes. talis actio nec frigitur negotio nec frigida est otio nec turbulenta nec marcida est nec audax nec fugax nec praeceps nec iacens. haec agite et deus pacis erit uobiscum.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise, when you do anything vigorously and eagerly and work tirelessly, whether in prayers or fasts or almsgiving, either giving something to the needy or forgiving injuries, as God in Christ has forgiven us; or subduing harmful habits and chastising the body and bringing it into subjection; or bearing tribulation, and above all bearing with one another in love (for what will he bear who does not bear with his brother?); or watching for the cunning and snares of the tempter and repelling and extinguishing his fiery darts with the shield of faith; or singing and making melody to the Lord in your hearts, or with voices not out of tune with the heart: do all things to the glory of God, who works all in all, and be so fervent in spirit that your soul may make its boast in the Lord. For that is the action of the right road which always has its eyes on the Lord, since he will pluck one's feet out of the snare. Such action is neither broken by business nor cold in leisure, neither turbulent nor languid, neither rash nor timid, neither headlong nor sluggish. Do these things, and the God of peace will be with you.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:32: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:27: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:16: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:19: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:31: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:11: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 25:15 (24:15 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Phil 4:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Eph 4:32; 1 Cor 9:27; Eph 4:2; Eph 6:16; Eph 5:19; 1 Cor 10:31; 1 Cor 12:6; Rom 12:11; Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX/Vulg.); Ps 25:15 (24:15 LXX/Vulg.); Phil 4:9. 'Broken' renders frigitur, read as frangitur; the printed word is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 48.3 (CSEL 34.2:139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-3).

## Letter 48.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:139–140
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains why he wrote and mentions the death of the monk Eustasius.

### Latin text

Nec importunum me existimet caritas uestra, quia uobiscum loqui uel per epistulam uolui. non enim hoc uos monui, quod uos non arbitror facere; sed credidi me non parum commendari deo a uobis, si ea, quae munere illius facitis, cum adlocutionis nostrae memoria faciatis. nam et ante iam fama et nunc fratres, qui uenerunt a uobis, Eustasius et Andreas bonum Christi odorem de uestra sancta conuersatione ad nos adtulerunt. quorum Eustasius in eam requiem praecessit, quae nullis fluctibus sicut insula tunditur, nec Caprariam desiderat, quia nec cilicio iam quaerit indui.

### English translation (Claude)

Let your Charity not think me tiresome because I wished to speak with you, even by letter. For I have not advised you of this because I think you do not do it; but I believed that I would be commended to God by you not a little if you did what you do by his gift with remembrance of our words to you. For both earlier by report, and now through the brothers who have come from you, Eustasius and Andrew, the good odour of Christ from your holy way of life has reached us. Of these, Eustasius has gone before into that rest which is not beaten by any waves like an island, and does not long for Capraria, since he no longer seeks to be clothed in sackcloth.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 2:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 2 Cor 2:15. Capraria is an island off Tuscany (modern Capraia).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 48.4 (CSEL 34.2:139–140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-48-4).

## Letter 49.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:140
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts the Donatist bishop Honoratus's proposal to discuss their differences by letter.

### Latin text

Consilium tuum multum nobis placuit, quod fratrem Herotem, carissimum nobis et in Christo laudabilem uirum, mandare dignatus es, ut litteris inter nos agamus, ubi nullus turbarum tumultus perturbare possit dispositionem nostram, quae cum tota pace et lenitate animi suscipienda et agenda est, sicut dicit apostolus: Seruum autem domini litigare non oportet, sed mitem esse ad omnes, docibilem, patientem, in modestia corripientem diuersa sentientes. itaque breuiter insinuamus, quid a te responderi desideremus.

### English translation (Claude)

Your proposal pleased us very much, which you were good enough to send by brother Heros, a man very dear to us and praiseworthy in Christ: that we should carry on our discussion by letter, where no tumult of crowds can disturb our arrangement, which must be undertaken and conducted in all peace and gentleness of mind, as the apostle says: 'The servant of the Lord must not quarrel, but be gentle toward all, apt to teach, patient, correcting in modesty those who think otherwise.' So we indicate briefly what we wish you to answer.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:24: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Honoratus, a Donatist bishop. Quotation of 2 Tim 2:24–25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 49.1 (CSEL 34.2:140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-1).

## Letter 49.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:140–142
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Scripture that the church is spread through all nations and that the Catholics, unlike the Donatists, are in communion with the churches founded by the apostles.

### Latin text

Quoniam ecclesiam eius, quae catholica dicitur, sicut de illa prophetatum est, per orbem terrarum diffusam uidemus, arbitramur nos non debere dubitare de tam euidentissima completione sanctae prophetiae, quam dominus etiam in euangelio confirmauit et apostoli, per quos eadem ecclesia dilatata est, sicut de illa praedictum erat. nam et in capite sacrosancti psalterii scriptum est de filio dei: Dominus dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te; postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae, et ipse dominus Iesus Christus dicit euangelium suum in omnibus gentibus futurum et apostolus Paulus, antequam sermo dei in Africam peruenisset, in ipso capite epistulae, quam scribit ad Romanos: Per quem accepimus, inquit, gratiam et apostolatum ad obaudiendum fidei in omnibus gentibus pro nomine eius. deinde ipse ab Hierusalem in circuitu per totam Asiam usque in Illyricum euangelium praedicauit, ecclesias constituit atque fundauit, non ipse sed gratia dei cum eo, sicut ipse testatur. quid autem euidentius apparere potest, quam cum in eius epistulis nomina etiam regionum uel ciuitatum inuenimus? ad Romanos, ad Corinthios, ad Galatas, ad Ephesios, ad Philippenses, ad Thessalonicenses, ad Colossenses scribit; Iohannes etiam scribit ad septem ecclesias, quas commemorat in illis partibus constitutas, in quibus etiam uniuersis ecclesiam septenario numero intellegimus commendari, Ephesum, Smyrnam, Sardis, Philadelphiam, Laodiciam, Pergamum, Thyatiram. quibus omnibus ecclesiis nos hodie communicare manifestum est, sicut manifestum est uos istis ecclesiis non communicare.

### English translation (Claude)

Since we see the church of him whose church is called Catholic spread throughout the world, as was prophesied of it, we think that we ought not to doubt so very evident a fulfilment of holy prophecy, which the Lord also confirmed in the gospel, and the apostles, through whom that same church was spread, as had been foretold of it. For at the head of the most holy Psalter it is written of the Son of God: 'The Lord said to me: You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance and the ends of the earth as your possession.' And the Lord Jesus Christ himself says that his gospel will be among all nations. And the apostle Paul, before the word of God had reached Africa, at the very head of the letter he writes to the Romans, says: 'Through whom we have received grace and apostleship for the obedience of faith among all nations for his name's sake.' Then he himself preached the gospel from Jerusalem round about through all Asia as far as Illyricum, establishing and founding churches; not he himself, but the grace of God with him, as he testifies. What can appear more evident than when we find in his letters even the names of regions and cities? He writes to the Romans, the Corinthians, the Galatians, the Ephesians, the Philippians, the Thessalonians, the Colossians; John also writes to seven churches, which he mentions as established in those parts, in which we understand the universal church to be signified by the number seven: Ephesus, Smyrna, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea, Pergamum, Thyatira. It is plain that we are in communion with all these churches today, as it is plain that you are not in communion with them.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 15:19: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:10: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 1:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 2:7–8 and Rom 1:5; allusions to Matt 24:14 / Mark 13:10, Rom 15:19, 1 Cor 15:10, Rev 1:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 49.2 (CSEL 34.2:140–142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-2).

## Letter 49.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:142–143
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Honoratus to explain how Christ's worldwide church could have survived only in the Donatist party in Africa.

### Latin text

Quaerimus ergo, ut nobis respondere non graueris, quam causam forte noueris, qua factum est, ut Christus amitteret hereditatem suam per orbem terrarum diffusam et subito in solis Afris nec ipsis omnibus remaneret. etenim ecclesia catholica est etiam in Africa, quia per omnes terras eam deus esse uoluit et praedixit. pars autem uestra, quae Donati dicitur, non est in illis omnibus locis, in quibus et litterae et sermo et facta apostolica cucurrerunt. sed ne dicatis non uocari ecclesiam nostram catholicam sed Macarianam, sicuti eam uos appellatis, nosse debes, quod facillime potest, in illis omnibus partibus, unde istas terras euangelium Christi perfudit, nec nomen Donati sciri nec nomen Macarii; uestra autem quia Donati pars dicitur, nec uos negare potestis et omnibus notum est, ubicumque est uestra communio. dignare ergo rescribere nobis, ut sciamus, quo modo fieri possit, ut ecclesiam suam Christus de toto orbe perdiderit et in uobis solis habere coeperit. uestrum est enim haec ostendere; nam nobis sufficit ad causam nostram, quod compleri prophetiam et scripturas sanctas per orbem terrarum uidemus. hoc autem ego Augustinus dictaui, quia olim uolo loqui inde tecum; uidetur enim mihi uel propter ipsam uicinitatem posse nos per litteras de hac re conloqui sine aliquo tumultu adiuuante deo, quantum ipsa necessitas postulat.

### English translation (Claude)

We ask you, then, not to be reluctant to answer us: what reason do you perhaps know for its having happened that Christ lost his inheritance spread throughout the world and that it suddenly remained among the Africans alone, and not even among all of them? For the Catholic Church is also in Africa, because God willed and foretold that it should be in all lands. But your party, which is called Donatus's, is not in all those places where the letters, the preaching, and the deeds of the apostles ran their course. And so that you may not say that our church is not called Catholic but Macarian, as you call it, you ought to know, as you very easily can, that in all those regions from which the gospel of Christ flowed into these lands, neither the name of Donatus nor the name of Macarius is known; but yours, since it is called the party of Donatus, you cannot deny, and it is known to all wherever your communion exists. Please write back, then, so that we may know how it could happen that Christ lost his church from the whole world and began to have it in you alone. For it is for you to show this; for us it is enough for our case that we see the prophecy and the holy Scriptures fulfilled throughout the world. I, Augustine, have dictated this because I have long wished to speak with you about it; for it seems to me that, if only because we are neighbours, we can confer by letter on this matter without any tumult, with God's help, as far as the need itself requires.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 49.3 (CSEL 34.2:142–143; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-49-3).

## Letter 50.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-50-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:143–144
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes the magistrates of Sufes for the killing of sixty Christians over a destroyed statue of Hercules, offering to replace the idol but demanding the lives back.

### Latin text

immanitatis uestrae famosissimum scelus et inopinata crudelitas terram concutit et percutit caelum, ut in plateis ac delubris uestris eluceat sanguis et resonet homicidium. apud uos Romanae sepultae sunt leges, iudiciorum rectorum calcatus est terror, imperatorum certe nulla ueneratio nec timor. apud uos sexaginta numero fratrum innocens effusus est sanguis et, si quis plures occidit, functus est laudibus et in uestram curiam tenuit principatum. age nunc principalem ueniamus ad causam. si Herculem uestrum dixeritis, porro reddemus; adsunt metalla, saxa nec desunt; accedunt et marmorum genera, suppeditat artificum copia. ceterum deus uester cum diligentia sculpitur, tornatur et ornatur; addimus et rubricam, quae pingat ruborem, quo possint uota uestra sacra sonare. nam si uestrum Herculem dixeritis, conlatis singulis nummis ab artifice uestro uobis emimus deum. reddite igitur animas, quas truculenta uestra manus contorsit, et, sicuti a nobis uester Hercules redhibetur, sic etiam a uobis tantorum animae reddantur.

### English translation (Claude)

The most notorious crime of your savagery and your unheard-of cruelty shake the earth and strike heaven, so that blood shines and murder resounds in your streets and shrines. Among you the Roman laws have been buried, the fear of upright courts trampled underfoot, and there is certainly no reverence or fear of the emperors. Among you the innocent blood of sixty of our brothers has been shed, and whoever killed the most has been rewarded with praise and has held the first place in your council. Come now, let us come to the principal cause. If you say Hercules is yours, we will certainly give him back: metals are at hand, nor is stone lacking; there are also kinds of marble, and plenty of craftsmen. Your god, moreover, will be carefully sculpted, turned, and adorned; we will add red ochre too, to paint the blush with which your sacred vows may sound. For if you say Hercules is yours, we will each contribute a coin and buy you a god from your craftsman. Give back, then, the lives which your savage hand has wrung out; and as your Hercules is given back by us, so let the lives of so many be given back by you.

### Translation notes

- To the leaders and elders of the colony of Sufes (Byzacena), after a riot (399) in which sixty Christians were killed in revenge for the destruction of a statue of Hercules. The irony is Augustine's. 'Brothers' (fratrum) are fellow Christians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 50.1 (CSEL 34.2:143–144; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-50-1).

## Letter 51.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:144–145
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes to the Donatist bishop Crispinus a debate by letter and argues that Scripture punishes schism more severely than idolatry or burning the sacred books.

### Latin text

Quia humilitatem nostram uestri reprehendunt, ideo sic epistulam praenotaui, quod in tuam contumeliam fecisse uidear, si non, ita mihi abs te ut rescribatur, expecto. de Carthaginiensi promissione tua uel nostra instantia quid multa commemorem? quo modo libet ea gesserimus, transierint, ne, quod restat, impediant. nunc excusatio, nisi fallor, nulla est adiuuante domino; ambo in Numidia sumus et nobis loco terrarum inuicem propinquamus. rumor ad me detulit adhuc uelle mecum disputando experiri de quaestione, quae nostram dirimit communionem. uide, quam breuiter omnes auferantur ambages; ad hanc epistulam responde, si placet, et fortasse sufficiet non solum nobis sed et eis, qui nos audire desiderant, aut, si non sufficiet, scripta atque rescripta, donec sufficiat, repetentur. quid enim nobis commodius poterit exhibere urbium, quas incolimus, tanta uicinitas? ego enim statui nihil de hac re agere uobiscum nisi per litteras, uel ne cui nostrum de memoria, quod dicitur, elabatur uel ne fraudentur talium studiosi, qui forte interesse non possunt. soletis de praeteritis rebus gestis, qui uultis, falsa iactare forte non mentiendi studio sed errore. proinde, si placet, de praesentibus illa metiamur. procul dubio te non fugit prioris populi temporibus et idolatriae sacrilegium fuisse commissum et a rege contemptore librum propheticum incensum; quo utroque crimine schismatis malum non puniretur atrocius, nisi grauius penderetur. profecto enim recordaris, quem ad modum schismatis auctores uiuos dehiscens terra sorbuerit et eos, qui consenserant, caelo inruens ignis absumpserit. sic nec fabricatum et adoratum idolum nec sacer liber exustus meruit uindicari.

### English translation (Claude)

Since your people find fault with our humility, I have headed this letter as I have; I would seem to have done this as an insult to you, were it not that I expect you to write back to me in the same way. As for your promise at Carthage, or our insistence, why should I say much? However we handled those things, let them pass, so that they may not hinder what remains. Now, unless I am mistaken, there is no excuse, with the Lord's help: we are both in Numidia and near each other in place. Report has brought me word that you still wish to try the question that divides our communion with me in debate. See how briefly all evasions can be removed: answer this letter, if you please, and perhaps it will be enough not only for us but for those who wish to hear us; or, if it is not enough, letters and replies will be repeated until it is. For what more convenient arrangement can the great nearness of the cities we live in provide for us? For I have resolved to deal with you on this matter only by letters, so that nothing, as they say, may slip from the memory of either of us, and so that those interested in such things who perhaps cannot be present may not be cheated. Those of you who wish are accustomed to throw out falsehoods about past events, perhaps not from a desire to lie but by error. So, if you please, let us measure those by present events. Surely you are aware that in the times of the former people both the sacrilege of idolatry was committed and the book of the prophet was burned by a contemptuous king; and the evil of schism would not have been punished more terribly than either crime unless it had been weighed as graver. You certainly remember how the earth opened and swallowed alive the authors of schism, and fire falling from heaven consumed those who had agreed with them. Neither the idol made and worshipped nor the sacred book burned was punished in this way.

### Scripture references

- Exod 32:4: allusion, high confidence
- Jer 36:23: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:32: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:35: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Crispinus, Donatist bishop of Calama. Augustine apparently headed the letter without honorific titles. Allusions to Exod 32; Jer 36:23; Num 16:31–35. A leaked line number in the digital text is removed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 51.1 (CSEL 34.2:144–145; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-1).

## Letter 51.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:145–146
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine presses Crispinus with the Donatists' reception of Felicianus and Praetextatus, condemned as Maximianist schismatics, back into their sees.

### Latin text

Cur ergo, qui soletis nobis obicere non solum in nostris non probata sed potius in uestris probata crimina eorum, qui formidine persecutionis inpulsi dominicos libros concremandos ignibus tradiderunt, uos eos, quos pro scelere schismatis plenarii concilii uestri ueridico, sicut ibi scriptum est, ore) damnastis, in eodem ipso episcopatu recepistis, in quo damnastis? Felicianum dico Mustitanum et Praetextatum Assuritanum. neque enim, sicut ignorantibus dicitis, ex eo numero fuerunt isti, quibus uestrum concilium diem prorogauerat et praefixerat, intra quem nisi ad uestram communionem remeauissent, eadem sententia tenerentur; sed de illo numero isti fuerunt, quos eo die sine dilatione damnastis, quo illis dilationem dedistis. probabo, si negaueris; concilium uestrum loquitur; proconsularia gesta habemus in manibus, quibus id non semel allegastis. aliam ergo defensionem para, si potes, ne, dum negas, quod conuincam, moras faciamus. Felicianus igitur et Praetextatus si innocentes erant, quare sic damnati sunt? si scelerati, quare sic recepti sunt? si probaueris innocentes, cur non credamus a multo paucioribus maioribus uestris falso crimine traditionis innocentes potuisse damnari, si a trecentis decem successoribus eorum, ubi etiam pro magno scriptum est plenarii concilii ore ueridico, in falso crimine schismatis innocentes damnari potuerunt? si autem probaueris recte fuisse damnatos, quae restat defensio, cur in eodem episcopatu recepti sint, nisi ut exaggerans utilitatem salubritatemque pacis ostendas etiam ista pro unitatis uinculo toleranda? quod utinam non oris sed cordis uiribus ageres! profecto perspiceres, quam nullis calumniis per orbem terrarum esset uiolanda pax Christi, si licet in Africa etiam in sacrilego schismate damnatos in eodem ipso episcopatu recipi pro pace Donati.

### English translation (Claude)

Why, then, do you, who are accustomed to charge us with the crimes of those who, driven by fear of persecution, handed over the Lord's books to be burned (crimes not proved against our people, but rather proved against yours), why have you received back, in the very same episcopal rank in which you condemned them, those whom you condemned for the crime of schism 'by the truthful mouth of your plenary council', as it is written there? I mean Felicianus of Musti and Praetextatus of Assuras. For they were not, as you tell the ignorant, of the number of those to whom your council had extended and fixed a date, by which, unless they returned to your communion, they would be bound by the same sentence; they were of the number of those whom you condemned without delay on the very day you gave the others a delay. I will prove it if you deny it; your council speaks; we have in our hands the proconsular records, in which you cited it more than once. Prepare another defence, then, if you can, so that we may not waste time while you deny what I will prove. If Felicianus and Praetextatus were innocent, why were they condemned so? If criminals, why were they received back so? If you prove them innocent, why should we not believe that innocent men could be condemned on a false charge of handing over by your predecessors, who were far fewer, if innocent men could be condemned on a false charge of schism by three hundred and ten of their successors, where it is even written in grand style, 'by the truthful mouth of a plenary council'? But if you prove that they were rightly condemned, what defence remains for their being received back in the same episcopal rank, except that, enlarging on the usefulness and wholesomeness of peace, you show that even such things are to be tolerated for the bond of unity? If only you did this with the strength of your heart and not of your mouth! You would surely see that the peace of Christ throughout the world must not be violated by any slanders, if in Africa even men condemned for sacrilegious schism may be received back in the very same episcopal rank for the peace of Donatus.

### Translation notes

- The Donatist Council of Bagai (394), with 310 bishops, condemned Maximian and his ordainers. The phrase 'by the truthful mouth of a plenary council' is quoted from its decree.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 51.2 (CSEL 34.2:145–146; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-2).

## Letter 51.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:146–147
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns the charge of persecution back on the Donatists, who used imperial judges to expel the Maximianists from their churches.

### Latin text

Item soletis nobis obicere, quod uos per potestates terrenas persequamur. qua in re non disputo, uel quid uos pro immanitate tanti sacrilegii mereamini uel quantum nos Christiana temperet mansuetudo; illud dico: si hoc crimen est, cur eosdem Maximianistas per iudices ab eis imperatoribus missos, quos per euangelium genuit nostra communio, grauiter insectati de basilicis, quas tenebant, in quibus eos inuenit ipsa conscissio, et controuersiarum strepitu et iussionum potentatu et auxiliorum impetu proturbastis? in qua conflictatione quae passi sint per loca singula, recentia rerum uestigia contestantur; quae iussa sint, chartae indicant; quae facta sint, terrae clamant, in quibus etiam Optati illius tribuni uestri sancta memoria praedicatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise you are accustomed to charge us with persecuting you through earthly powers. On this I do not argue either what you deserve for the enormity of so great a sacrilege, or how much Christian gentleness restrains us. I say this: if this is a crime, why did you pursue those same Maximianists vigorously through judges sent by those emperors whom our communion begot through the gospel, and drive them out of the basilicas they held, in which the split itself found them, by the din of lawsuits, the power of orders, and the onslaught of armed help? What they suffered in each place in that conflict, the fresh traces of the events attest; what was ordered, the documents show; what was done, the lands cry out, in which even the holy memory of that tribune of yours, Optatus, is proclaimed.

### Translation notes

- The emperors are Christians, 'begotten' through the gospel by the Catholic communion. 'Holy memory' of Optatus (Donatist bishop of Thamugadi) is ironic.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 51.3 (CSEL 34.2:146–147; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-3).

## Letter 51.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:147–148
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that by accepting without rebaptism those baptized by Maximianist bishops, the Donatists have conceded the validity of baptism outside their communion.

### Latin text

Item dicere soletis, quod nos Christi baptismum non habeamus et praeter uestram communionem nusquam sit. possem hinc uberius aliquanto disserere. sed contra uos iam nihil opus est, qui cum Feliciano et Praetextato etiam Maximianistarum baptismum recepistis. quotquot enim baptizauerunt, quando Maximiano communicabant, cum etiam ipsos nominatim, id est Felicianum et Praetextatum de basilicis eorum, sicut gesta testantur, diuturno conflictu iudiciorum expellere conaremini, quotquot ergo eo tempore baptizauerunt, nunc secum et uobiscum habent non solum per aegritudinum pericula sed etiam per sollemnitates paschales in tot ecclesiis ad suas ciuitates pertinentibus et in ipsis tam magnis ciuitatibus foris in scelere schismatis baptizatos, quorum nulli baptisma repetitum est. atque utinam probare possitis eos, quos foris in scelere schismatis Felicianus et Praetextatus tamquam inaniter baptizauerant, ab eis receptis intus quasi utiliter denuo baptizatos. si enim rursus baptizandi erant isti, rursus ordinandi erant illi; amiserant enim episcopatum recedentes a uobis, si extra communionem uestram baptizare non poterant; nam si discedentes episcopatum non amiserant, baptizare utique poterant, si autem amiserant, ergo, ut eis, quod amiserant, redderetur, redeuntes ordinari debebant. sed noli timere; sicut certum est cum eodem illo episcopatu, cum quo exierant, remeasse, ita certum est omnes, quos in Maximiani schismate baptizarunt, sine ulla baptismi repetitione se cum uestra communione reconciliasse.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise you are accustomed to say that we do not have the baptism of Christ and that it exists nowhere outside your communion. I could argue this at some length. But against you there is now no need, since together with Felicianus and Praetextatus you have received the baptism of the Maximianists too. For all whom they baptized while they were in communion with Maximian, at a time when you were trying to expel these very men by name, Felicianus and Praetextatus, from their basilicas by a long conflict in the courts, as the records testify, all whom they baptized at that time they now have with themselves and with you, not only in the dangers of sickness but also at the Easter solemnities, in so many churches belonging to their cities, and in those great cities themselves: people baptized outside in the crime of schism, of whom none has had baptism repeated. And would that you could prove that those whom Felicianus and Praetextatus had baptized outside in the crime of schism, as if in vain, were baptized again inside, as if usefully, by these men after they had been received back! For if these needed to be baptized again, those needed to be ordained again; for they had lost the episcopate by departing from you, if they could not baptize outside your communion. For if in departing they had not lost the episcopate, they could certainly baptize; but if they had lost it, then, so that what they had lost might be restored to them, they ought to have been ordained when they returned. But do not fear: just as it is certain that they returned with the same episcopate with which they had gone out, so it is certain that all whom they baptized in the schism of Maximian were reconciled to your communion without any repetition of baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 51.4 (CSEL 34.2:147–148; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-4).

## Letter 51.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:148–149
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that the Donatists accept the baptism of condemned Maximianists while rejecting that of the worldwide church, and calls on Crispinus to answer.

### Latin text

Quibus igitur sufficimus lacrimis plangere recipi baptismum Maximianistarum et exsufflari baptismum orbis terrarum? siue auditos siue inauditos siue iuste siue iniuste damnastis Felicianum, damnastis Praetextatum, dic mihi: quem Corinthiorum episcopum audiuit aut damnauit aliquis uestrum? quem Galatarum, quem Ephesiorum, quem Colossensium, Philippensium, Thessalonicensium ceterarumque omnium ciuitatium, de quibus dictum est: Adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium? ergo istorum baptismus acceptatur et illorum exsufflatur, qui nec istorum est nec illorum sed illius, de quo dictum est: Hic est, qui baptizat. sed non hinc ago; ad illa, quae praesto sunt, aduerte; ea, quae oculos etiam caecos feriunt. intuere: damnati habent baptismum et inauditi non habent! nominatim in scelere schismatis expressi et eiecti habent et ignoti, longe peregrini, numquam accusati, numquam iudicati non habent! qui de praecisa parte Africae rursus praecisi sunt, habent et, unde ipsum euangelium in Africam uenit, non habent! quid pluribus onero? ad ista responde. adtende sacrilegium schismatis uestro concilio Maximianistis exaggeratum, adtende persecutiones per iudiciarias potestates, quas eis inrogastis, adtende baptismum eorum, quem cum eis, quos damnastis, recepistis, et responde, si potes, utrum habeatis aliquid, unde iniciatis nebulas imperitis, cur ab orbe terrarum longe maiore scelere schismatis separemini, quam quod in Maximianistis uos damnasse gloriamini. pax Christi uincat in corde tuo.

### English translation (Claude)

With what tears, then, can we lament enough that the baptism of the Maximianists is received and the baptism of the whole world is exorcized with breath? Whether you condemned Felicianus and Praetextatus heard or unheard, justly or unjustly, tell me: what bishop of the Corinthians did any of you hear or condemn? Of the Galatians, of the Ephesians, of the Colossians, Philippians, Thessalonians, and all the other cities of which it was said: 'All the families of the nations shall worship before him'? So the baptism of these men is accepted and that of those is exorcized, though it belongs neither to these nor to those, but to him of whom it was said: 'This is he who baptizes.' But I am not arguing from that; turn to what is at hand, the things that strike even blind eyes. Look: the condemned have baptism, and the unheard do not! Those expressly named and cast out for the crime of schism have it, and the unknown, far-off strangers, never accused, never judged, do not! Those who were cut off again from a part of Africa already cut off have it, and those from whom the gospel itself came to Africa do not! Why burden you with more? Answer these things. Consider the sacrilege of schism magnified by your council against the Maximianists; consider the persecutions you inflicted on them through judicial powers; consider their baptism, which you received together with those you condemned; and answer, if you can, whether you have anything by which to cast mist over the ignorant, explaining why you are separated from the whole world by a far greater crime of schism than that which you boast of having condemned in the Maximianists. May the peace of Christ conquer in your heart.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 1:33: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX/Vulg.) and John 1:33; allusion to Col 3:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 51.5 (CSEL 34.2:148–149; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/47-1/#p-51-5).

## Letter 52.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:149–150
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine welcomes a letter from his Donatist kinsman Severinus and points him to the Catholic Church, the city on a hill that cannot be hidden.

### Latin text

Litteras fraternitatis tuae etsi ualde sero, etsi praeter quod speraueram, tamen laetus accepi. maxime ampliore gaudio perfusus sum, cum cognouissem hominem uestrum in ipsa sola causa uenisse Hipponem, ut ad me litteras tuae fraternitatis adferret. cogitaui enim non sine causa hoc exortum esse in animo tuo, ut recoleres consanguinitatem nostram, nisi quia fortasse perspicis, sicut noui non leue pondus prudentiae tuae, quam sit dolendum, ut, qui secundum carnem fratres sumus, in Christi corpore non una societate uiuamus, praesertim quia facile tibi est adtendere et uidere ciuitatem super montem constitutam, de qua dominus ait in euangelio, quod abscondi non possit; ipsa est enim ecclesia catholica, unde καθολικὴ graece appellatur, quod per totum orbem terrarum diffunditur. hanc ignorare nulli licet; ideo secundum uerbum domini nostri Jesu Christi abscondi non potest.

### English translation (Claude)

Though very late, and beyond what I had hoped, I gladly received the letter of your Brotherliness. I was filled with still greater joy when I learned that your man had come to Hippo for this sole purpose, to bring me your Brotherliness's letter. For I thought that it was not without reason that it arose in your mind to recall our kinship, unless perhaps because you perceive, as I know the considerable weight of your prudence, how much it is to be lamented that we who are brothers according to the flesh do not live in one fellowship in the body of Christ; especially since it is easy for you to observe and see the city set on a mountain, of which the Lord says in the gospel that it cannot be hidden. For that is the Catholic Church, for which reason it is called in Greek katholikē, because it is spread through the whole world. No one may be ignorant of it; therefore, according to the word of our Lord Jesus Christ, it cannot be hidden.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Severinus, a relative of Augustine in the Donatist communion. Allusion to Matt 5:14. Augustine derives 'catholic' from the Greek 'throughout the whole'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 52.1 (CSEL 34.2:149–150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-1).

## Letter 52.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:150
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the Donatists to branches cut off from the vine for lack of the fruit of love.

### Latin text

Pars autem Donati in solis Afris calumniatur orbi terrarum et non considerat ea sterilitate, qua fructus pacis et caritatis adferre noluit, ab illa radice orientalium ecclesiarum se esse praecisam, unde euangelium in Africam uenit, unde terra si eis adferatur, adorant; fidelis autem inde si ueniat, exsufflant et rebaptizant etiam. hoc enim praedixit filius dei, qui ueritas est, se esse uitem, suos autem filios esse sarmenta et patrem suum agricolam: Sarmentum, inquit, quod in me non dat fructum, pater meus tollet illud; sarmentum autem quod in me dat fructum, purgat illud, ut maiorem fructum adferat. non ergo mirum est, si de illa uite, quae creuit et omnes terras impleuit, praecisi sunt illi, qui fructum caritatis adferre noluerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But the party of Donatus, among the Africans alone, slanders the whole world, and does not consider that by the barrenness with which it refused to bear the fruits of peace and love it has been cut off from the root of the Eastern churches, from which the gospel came to Africa; if earth is brought to them from there, they worship it; but if a believer comes from there, they exorcize him with breath and even rebaptize him. For the Son of God, who is the truth, foretold this, that he is the vine and his sons the branches, and his Father the vinedresser: 'Every branch in me that does not bear fruit,' he says, 'my Father will take away; and every branch that bears fruit in me he prunes, that it may bear more fruit.' It is no wonder, then, if those who refused to bear the fruit of love have been cut off from that vine which grew and filled all lands.

### Scripture references

- John 15:1: allusion, high confidence
- John 15:2: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of John 15:2; allusion to John 15:1, 5. 'Earth brought from there' refers to soil from the Holy Land venerated as a relic.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 52.2 (CSEL 34.2:150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-2).

## Letter 52.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:150–151
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that either the Donatists' charges were false or they failed to prove them, and in either case their schism is without excuse.

### Latin text

Qui si uera crimina obiecissent collegis suis, maiores eorum, quando schisma fecerunt, ipsi obtinuissent causam suam apud ecclesiam transmarinam, unde ad istas partes Christianae fidei manauit auctoritas, ut illi essent foris, quibus eadem crimina obiciebant. nunc autem cum illi inueniuntur intus communicare ecclesiis apostolicis, quarum nomina in libris sanctis habent et recitant, isti autem foris positi et ab illa communione separati sunt, quis non intellegat eos habuisse causam bonam, qui eam apud medios iudices obtinere potuerunt? aut si causam bonam habebant et eam transmarinis ecclesiis probare non potuerunt, quid illos laesit orbis terrarum, ubi episcopi collegas suos, qui apud eos obiectis criminibus conuicti non erant, temere damnare non possent? itaque innocentes rebaptizantur et Christus in innocentibus exsufflatur. si autem idem Donatistae Afrorum collegarum suorum uera crimina nouerant et neglexerunt eadem monstrare et probare transmarinis ecclesiis, ipsi se ab unitate Christi sceleratissimo schismate praeciderunt, non habent, quod excusent, et uos nostis, maxime quia tam multi scelerati apud eos emerserunt et tolerauerunt illos per tot annos, ne partem Donati conscinderent, et non dubitauerunt illo tempore falsas suspiciones suas obicientes pacem Christi unitatemque disrumpere et uos uidetis.

### English translation (Claude)

If their forebears, when they made the schism, had brought true charges against their colleagues, they themselves would have won their case before the church overseas, from which the authority of the Christian faith flowed to these parts, so that those against whom they brought the charges would be outside. But as it is, when the former are found inside, in communion with the apostolic churches, whose names these men have and read in the holy books, while the latter are placed outside and separated from that communion, who does not understand that those had the good case who were able to win it before impartial judges? Or if they had a good case and could not prove it to the churches overseas, what harm did the whole world do them, where bishops could not rashly condemn their colleagues who had not been convicted before them of the charges brought? And so innocent men are rebaptized, and Christ is exorcized in the innocent. But if the Donatists knew true crimes of their African colleagues and neglected to show and prove them to the churches overseas, they have cut themselves off from the unity of Christ by a most wicked schism and have no excuse; and you know it, especially since so many criminals have emerged among them, and they have tolerated them for so many years so as not to tear the party of Donatus apart, and yet did not hesitate at that time, alleging their false suspicions, to break the peace and unity of Christ; and you see it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 52.3 (CSEL 34.2:150–151; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-3).

## Letter 52.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:151–152
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Severinus not to let carnal habit keep him from the Catholic Church, warning of God's judgement.

### Latin text

Sed nescio quae carnalis consuetudo, frater Seuerine, ibi uos tenet; et olim doleo, olim gemo maxime prudentiam tuam cogitans et olim te uidere desidero, ut de hac re tecum loquerer. quid enim prodest uel salus uel consanguinitas temporalis, si aeternam Christi hereditatem salutemque perpetuam in nostra cognitione contemnimus? haec me interim scripsisse suffecerit, quae duris cordibus ualde pauca sunt et prope nulla, animo autem tuo, quem bene noui, ualde multa sunt et ualde magna. non enim mea sunt; qui nihil sum, nisi quod expecto misericordiam dei, sed ipsius dei omnipotentis, quem quisquis in hoc saeculo comtempserit patrem, inueniet in futuro iudicem.

### English translation (Claude)

But some carnal habit or other, brother Severinus, holds you there; and I have long grieved, long groaned, thinking especially of your prudence, and I have long wished to see you, so as to speak with you about this matter. For what profit is there in temporal well-being or kinship if in our kinship we despise the eternal inheritance of Christ and everlasting salvation? Let it suffice for me to have written this for now: to hard hearts it is very little and almost nothing, but to your mind, which I know well, it is very much and very great. For these words are not mine, who am nothing except that I wait for the mercy of God, but are of almighty God himself; and whoever despises him as Father in this world will find him as Judge in the world to come.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 52.4 (CSEL 34.2:151–152; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-52-4).

## Letter 53.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:152–153
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Fortunatus, Alypius, and Augustine answer a Donatist presbyter who claimed an angel told him to write to Generosus, citing Paul's curse on any other gospel.

### Latin text

Quoniam nobis notam esse uoluisti epistulam, quam ad te Donatistarum presbyter dedit, quamquam eam tu quoque catholico animo deriseris, tamen, ut ei potius, si non desperate desipit, consulas, haec ad eum rescripta petimus perferas. ille enim ordinem Christianitatis ciuitatis uestrae tibi ut insinuaret, iussisse sibi angelum scripsit, cum tu teneas Christianitatem non ciuitatis tuae tantum nec tantum Africae uel Afrorum sed totius orbis terrae, quae adnuntiata est et adnuntiatur omnibus gentibus. unde illos parum est quod praecisos esse non pudet nec sibi subueniunt, ut, cum possunt, redeant ad radicem, nisi etiam secum alios praecidere et sicut ligna arida in ignem destinare conentur. quapropter si tibi ipsi angelus adstitisset, quem sibi ille propter te adstitisse, quantum arbitramur, astuta uanitate confingit, et haec ipsa tibi dixisset, quae iste mandato illius tibi se insinuare dicit, oporteret te apostolicae sententiae memorem fieri, qui ait: Licet si nos aut angelus de caelo uobis euangelizauerit praeter id, quod euangelizauimus uobis, anathema sit. euangelizatum est enim tibi per uocem ipsius domini Iesu Christi, quod omnibus gentibus adnuntiabitur euangelium eius et tunc erit finis; euangelizatum tibi est per propheticas et apostolicas litteras, quod Abrahae dictae sunt promissiones et semini eius, quod est Christus, cum ei diceret deus: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes. has ergo promissiones tenenti si tibi angelus de caelo diceret: Dimitte Christianitatem orbis terrae et tene partis Donati, cuius ordo tibi exponitur in epistula episcopi tuae ciuitatis, anathema esse deberet, quia te a toto praecidere et in partem contrudere conaretur et alienare a promissis dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Since you wished us to know of the letter which a presbyter of the Donatists sent you, although you too laughed at it with a Catholic mind, nevertheless, so that you may rather do him good, if his folly is not hopeless, we ask you to deliver to him this reply. For he wrote that an angel had commanded him to set out for you the order of the Christianity of your city, when you hold the Christianity not of your city only, nor only of Africa or the Africans, but of the whole world, which has been proclaimed and is being proclaimed to all nations. Hence it is not enough for them that they are not ashamed of being cut off and do not help themselves by returning to the root while they can; they even try to cut others off with themselves and destine them for the fire like dry wood. Therefore, if the angel had stood by you yourself, whom that man, as we think, invents with cunning vanity to have stood by him on your account, and had said to you the very things which he says he is setting out to you at the angel's command, you ought to remember the sentence of the apostle, who says: 'Even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel other than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.' For it has been preached to you by the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ himself that his gospel will be proclaimed to all nations, and then the end will come; it has been preached to you through the prophetic and apostolic writings that the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed, which is Christ, when God said to him: 'In your seed all nations shall be blessed.' If, then, while you hold these promises, an angel from heaven said to you, 'Abandon the Christianity of the whole world and hold that of the party of Donatus, whose order is set out to you in the letter of the bishop of your city,' he ought to be accursed, because he would be trying to cut you off from the whole, thrust you into a part, and estrange you from the promises of God.

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:14: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Generosus of Constantina, from Fortunatus, Alypius, and Augustine. Quotations of Gal 1:8 and Gen 22:18 (cf. Gal 3:16); allusions to Matt 24:14 and John 15:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.1 (CSEL 34.2:152–153; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-1).

## Letter 53.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:153–154
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists the bishops of Rome from Peter to Anastasius and notes that no Donatist bishop appears in the succession.

### Latin text

Si enim ordo episcoporum sibi succedentium considerandus est, quanto certius et uere salubriter ab ipso Petro numeramus, cui totius ecclesiae figuram gerenti dominus ait: Super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et portae inferorum non uincent eam. Petro enim successit Linus, Lino Clemens, Clementi Anacletus, Anacleto Euaristus, Euaristo Sixtus, Sixto Telesphorus, Telesphoro Hyginus, Hygino Anicetus, Aniceto Pius, Pio Soter, Soteri Alexander, Alexandro Victor, Victori Zephyrinus, Zephyrino Calistus, Calisto Urbanus, Urbano Pontianus, Pontiano Antherus, Anthero Fabianus, Fabiano Cornelius, Cornelio Lucius, Lucio Stephanus, Stephano Sixtus, Sixto Dionysius, Dionysio Felix, Felici Eutychianus, Eutychiano Gaius, Gaio Marcellus, Marcello Eusebius, Eusebio Melchiades, Melchiadi Siluester, Siluestro Marcus, Marco Iulius, Iulio Liberius, Liberio Damasus, Damaso Siricius, Siricio Anastasius. in hoc ordine successionis nullus Donatista episcopus inuenitur. sed ex transuerso ex Africa ordinatum miserunt, qui paucis praesidens Afris in urbe Roma Montensium uel Cutzupitarum uocabulum propagauit.

### English translation (Claude)

For if the order of bishops succeeding one another is to be considered, how much more surely and truly wholesomely do we count from Peter himself, to whom, as bearing the figure of the whole church, the Lord said: 'Upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not overcome it.' For Peter was succeeded by Linus, Linus by Clement, Clement by Anacletus, Anacletus by Evaristus, Evaristus by Sixtus, Sixtus by Telesphorus, Telesphorus by Hyginus, Hyginus by Anicetus, Anicetus by Pius, Pius by Soter, Soter by Alexander, Alexander by Victor, Victor by Zephyrinus, Zephyrinus by Callistus, Callistus by Urban, Urban by Pontianus, Pontianus by Anterus, Anterus by Fabian, Fabian by Cornelius, Cornelius by Lucius, Lucius by Stephen, Stephen by Sixtus, Sixtus by Dionysius, Dionysius by Felix, Felix by Eutychianus, Eutychianus by Gaius, Gaius by Marcellus, Marcellus by Eusebius, Eusebius by Miltiades, Miltiades by Silvester, Silvester by Mark, Mark by Julius, Julius by Liberius, Liberius by Damasus, Damasus by Siricius, Siricius by Anastasius. In this order of succession no Donatist bishop is found. But they sent one ordained in Africa from the side, who, presiding over a few Africans in the city of Rome, spread the name of 'Mountain-men' or 'Cutzupitae'.

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 16:18. The list is translated as printed: it places Alexander after Soter (where modern lists have Eleutherius, and Alexander after Evaristus) and omits Marcellinus. The Donatists at Rome were nicknamed Montenses ('Mountain-men') or Cutzupitae.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.2 (CSEL 34.2:153–154; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-2).

## Letter 53.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:154
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that even an unworthy bishop in the succession would not harm the church, since the faithful hope in the Lord, not in men.

### Latin text

In illum autem ordinem episcoporum, qui ducitur ab ipso Petro usque ad Anastasium, qui nunc eandem cathedram sedet, etiam si quisquam traditor per illa tempora subrepsisset, nihil praeiudicaret ecclesiae et innocentibus Christianis, quibus dominus prouidens ait de praepositis malis: Quae dicunt, facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite: dicunt enim et non faciunt, ut certa sit spes fidelis, quae non in homine sed in domino conlocata numquam tempestate sacrilegi schismatis dissipetur, sicut isti dissipati sunt, qui legunt in codicibus sanctis ecclesias, quibus apostoli scripserunt, et nullum in eis habent episcopum. quid autem peruersius et insanius quam lectoribus easdem epistulas legentibus dicere: Pax tecum et ab earum ecclesiarum pace separari, quibus ipsae epistulae scriptae sunt?

### English translation (Claude)

Into that order of bishops which runs from Peter himself to Anastasius, who now sits in that same chair, even if some traitor had crept in during those times, it would not prejudice the church and innocent Christians, for whom the Lord provided when he said of bad leaders: 'Do what they say, but do not do what they do; for they say and do not do'; so that the hope of the faithful may be sure, which, placed not in man but in the Lord, is never scattered by the storm of sacrilegious schism, as these men have been scattered, who read in the holy books of the churches to which the apostles wrote and have no bishop in them. What is more perverse and insane than to say to readers reading those same letters, 'Peace be with you,' and to be separated from the peace of the churches to which those letters were written?

### Scripture references

- Matt 23:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 23:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.3 (CSEL 34.2:154; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-3).

## Letter 53.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:154–155
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites the records showing that Silvanus, the first Donatist bishop of Constantina, had himself handed over church property in the persecution.

### Latin text

Tamen ne sibi etiam de Constantinensi, hoc est ciuitatis uestrae episcoporum ordine blandiatur, recita illi gesta apud Munatium Felicem, flaminem perpetuum, curatorem tunc eiusdem ciuitatis uestrae Diocletiano VIII. et Maximiano VII. consulibus undecimo Kalendas Iunias, quibus liquido constitit ita Paulum episcopum tradidisse, ut Siluanus tunc eius subdiaconus fuerit et cum illo tradiderit proferens instrumenta dominica, etiam quae diligenter fuerant occultata, capitulatam argenteam et lucernam argenteam, ita ut ei diceret Victor quidam: Mortuus fueras, si non illas inuenisses. hunc iste Siluanum, manifestissimum traditorem, pro magno commemorat in epistula, quam tibi scripsit, a Secundo Tigisitano primae sedis episcopo episcopum tunc ordinatum. quiescat ergo superba eorum lingua et cognoscat crimina sua, ne delirans loquatur aliena. recita illi etiam, si uoluerit, gesta ecclesiastica eiusdem Secundi Tigisitani in domo Urbani Donati habita, ubi confessos traditores iudici deo dimisit, Donatum Masculitanum, Marinum ab Aquis Tibilitanis, Donatum Calamensem, cum quibus confessis traditoribus memoratum traditorem Siluanum eis ordinauit episcopum. recita illi gesta apud Zenophilum consularem, ubi Nundinarius quidam diaconus iratus Siluano, quod ab eo fuerit excommunicatus, haec omnia iudiciis prodidit, quae certis documentis et responsionibus testium et recitatione gestorum et multarum epistularum luce clarius constiterunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But so that he may not flatter himself even about the order of bishops of Constantina, that is, of your city, read him the records of proceedings before Munatius Felix, perpetual flamen and then curator of that same city of yours, in the eighth consulship of Diocletian and the seventh of Maximian, on the eleventh day before the Kalends of June, in which it was clearly established that bishop Paul handed over the Scriptures, and that Silvanus, then his subdeacon, handed over with him, producing the Lord's vessels, even those that had been carefully hidden, a silver chest and a silver lamp, so that a certain Victor said to him: 'You would have been a dead man if you had not found them.' This Silvanus, a most manifest traitor, that man mentions with pride in the letter he wrote to you as having been then ordained bishop by Secundus of Tigisis, bishop of the first see. Let their proud tongue be still, then, and acknowledge its own crimes, so as not to rave and speak of others'. Read him also, if he wishes, the church records of that same Secundus of Tigisis held in the house of Urbanus Donatus, where he left to God as judge confessed traitors, Donatus of Mascula, Marinus of Aquae Tibilitanae, and Donatus of Calama; and with these confessed traitors he ordained for them as bishop the aforementioned traitor Silvanus. Read him the records before Zenophilus the consular, where a certain deacon Nundinarius, angry with Silvanus for having excommunicated him, disclosed all these things to the courts, which were established clearer than light by sure documents, the answers of witnesses, the reading of records, and many letters.

### Translation notes

- The proceedings before Munatius Felix are dated 19 May 303. 'Capitulatam' is obscure; rendered 'chest' by conjecture.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.4 (CSEL 34.2:154–155; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-4).

## Letter 53.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:155–156
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists the documents of the early Donatist controversy that prove Caecilian's innocence.

### Latin text

Multa sunt alia, quae illi recites, si non contentiose agere sed prudenter audire uoluerit: preces Donatistarum ad Constantinum, ut propter ipsam causam inter Afros episcopos dirimendam iudices ex Gallia episcopos mitteret; litteras etiam eiusdem imperatoris, ubi episcopos misit ad urbem Romam; gesta quoque in urbe Roma, ubi ab episcopis, quos ille miserat, causa cognita atque discussa est; itemque alias litteras, ubi declarat memoratus imperator eos apud se de collegarum suorum iudicio, id est episcoporum, quos ad urbem Romam miserat, fuisse conquestos, ubi etiam alios episcopos uoluit apud Arelatum iudicare, ubi isti et ab ipsorum iudicio ad eundem imperatorem appellauerunt, ubi postremo causam inter partes ipse cognouit, ubi eos uehementissime detestatur innocentia Caeciliani fuisse superatos. quae, si uoluerit, audiet et tacebit et desinet insidiari ueritati.

### English translation (Claude)

There are many other things you could read to him, if he is willing not to argue contentiously but to listen prudently: the petitions of the Donatists to Constantine, asking him to send bishops from Gaul as judges to settle this case among the African bishops; the letter of the same emperor in which he sent bishops to the city of Rome; the records also of the proceedings in the city of Rome, where the case was heard and discussed by the bishops he had sent; and another letter, in which the said emperor declares that they had complained to him about the judgement of their colleagues, that is, the bishops he had sent to the city of Rome; in which he also wished other bishops to judge at Arles; where these men appealed from their judgement too to the same emperor; where finally he himself heard the case between the parties; where he most vehemently denounces them as defeated by the innocence of Caecilian. If he is willing, he will hear these things and be silent and stop lying in wait for the truth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.5 (CSEL 34.2:155–156; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-5).

## Letter 53.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:156–157
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Scripture and from the Maximianist affair that the Donatists' charge of contagion through communion condemns themselves.

### Latin text

Quamquam nos non tam de istis documentis praesumamus quam de scripturis sanctis, ubi hereditas Christi usque ad terminos terrae promissa est in omnibus gentibus. unde isti nefario schismate separati iactant crimina in paleam messis dominicae, quae necesse est usque ad finem permixta toleretur, donec ultimo iudicio tota area uentiletur. unde manifestum est ista crimina seu uera seu falsa non pertinere ad frumenta dominica, quae per totum agrum, id est istum mundum usque in finem saeculi oportet crescere, sicut non falsus angelus in huius errore sed dominus in euangelio loquitur. ideoque in Christianos innocentes, qui per totum orbem malis Christianis tamquam paleae suae uel zizaniis permixti sunt, multa falsa crimina et uana iactantibus his miseris Donatistis merito deus reddidit, ut Maximianistas apud Carthaginem schismaticos suos, Primiani damnatores, extra Primianum baptizatores, post Primianum rebaptizatores, uniuersali concilio suo damnarent, ut ex eorum numero post non paruum tempus quosdam in honoribus episcopatus sui, Felicianum Mustitanum et Praetextatum Assuritanum, cogente Optato Gildoniano susciperent cum omnibus, quos damnati extra baptizauerunt. quod si ab eis, quos ore proprio tamquam sceleratos et sacrilegos damnauerunt et quos illis primis schismaticis, quos uiuos terra obruit, compararunt, non maculantur, cum eis rursus in honore suo receptis communicant, euigilent aliquando, cogitent, quanta caecitate et quanta insania dicant orbem terrarum ignotis Afrorum criminibus esse maculatum et hereditatem Christi, quae promissa exhibita est in omnibus gentibus, peccatis Afrorum per contagionem communicationis fuisse deletam, quando se nolunt deletos et maculatos uideri, dum eis communicant, quorum crimina cognita iudicarunt.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet we rely not so much on these documents as on the holy Scriptures, where the inheritance of Christ is promised to the ends of the earth among all nations. Separated from it by a wicked schism, these men hurl charges at the chaff of the Lord's harvest, which must be tolerated, mixed in, until the end, until the whole threshing floor is winnowed at the last judgement. From this it is plain that these charges, whether true or false, do not concern the Lord's wheat, which must grow throughout the whole field, that is, this world, until the end of the age, as not a false angel in this man's error but the Lord in the gospel says. And so, since these wretched Donatists hurl many false and empty charges against innocent Christians who throughout the world are mixed with bad Christians as with their chaff or tares, God has justly repaid them: they condemned by their universal council the Maximianists at Carthage, their own schismatics, who condemned Primian, baptized apart from Primian, and rebaptized after Primian; and then, after no short time, under the compulsion of Optatus the Gildonian, they received back some of their number in the rank of their episcopate, Felicianus of Musti and Praetextatus of Assuras, together with all whom they had baptized outside while condemned. If they are not stained by those whom with their own mouth they condemned as criminal and sacrilegious, and compared to those first schismatics whom the earth buried alive, when they communicate with them, received back again in their rank, let them at last wake up and consider with what blindness and madness they say that the whole world has been stained by unknown crimes of Africans, and that the inheritance of Christ, promised and now displayed among all nations, has been destroyed by the sins of Africans through the contagion of communion, when they do not wish to be seen as destroyed and stained while they communicate with men whose crimes they knew and judged.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:32: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Ps 2:8; Matt 3:12; Matt 13:24–30, 38–40; Num 16:31–33. Optatus of Thamugadi was an ally of the rebel Gildo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.6 (CSEL 34.2:156–157; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-6).

## Letter 53.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:157–158
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that the presbyter's angel was either Satan disguised or a lie, and that he has been answered in love.

### Latin text

Quapropter cum Paulus apostolus iterum dicat, quia ipse satanas transfigurat se in angelum lucis, unde non esse mirum, si ministri eius transfigurant se sicut ministros iustitiae, si uere iste aliquem angelum uidit erroris nuntium et de unitate catholica Christianos separare cupientem, ipse passus est angelum satanae transfigurantem se uelut angelum lucis. si autem mentitur et nihil tale uidit, ipse est minister satanae transfigurans se uelut ministrum iustitiae. et tamen ista omnia considerans si nimium peruersus et pertinax esse noluerit, poterit ab omni uel aliena uel sua seductione liberari. nos enim per occasionem tuam sine aliquo odio conuenimus hoc circa eum seruantes, quod apostolus dicit: Seruum autem domini litigare non oportet, sed mitem esse ad omnes, docibilem, patientem, in modestia corripientem diuersa sentientes, ne forte det illis deus paenitentiam ad cognoscendam ueritatem et resipiscant de diaboli laqueis captiuati ab ipso in ipsius uoluntatem. si ergo aliquid aspere diximus, non ad amaritudinem dissensionis sed ad correptionem dilectionis ualere cognoscat. incolumis uiuas in Christo, dilectissime et honorabilis frater. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, since the apostle Paul says again that Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light, so that it is not surprising if his ministers transform themselves as ministers of righteousness: if that man really saw some angel, a messenger of error wishing to separate Christians from Catholic unity, he has encountered an angel of Satan transforming himself as an angel of light. But if he is lying and saw nothing of the kind, he is himself a minister of Satan transforming himself as a minister of righteousness. And yet, considering all these things, if he does not choose to be excessively perverse and obstinate, he can be freed from all seduction, whether of others or his own. For through the opportunity you gave us we have addressed him without any hatred, observing toward him what the apostle says: 'The servant of the Lord must not quarrel, but be gentle toward all, apt to teach, patient, correcting in modesty those who think otherwise, in case God may grant them repentance to know the truth, and they may come to their senses out of the snares of the devil, by whom they have been taken captive to do his will.' If, then, we have said anything harshly, let him know that it aims not at the bitterness of dissension but at the correction of love. May you live safe in Christ, dearly beloved and honoured brother. Amen.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:14: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:15: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:24: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:25: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 2 Cor 11:14–15; quotation of 2 Tim 2:24–26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 53.7 (CSEL 34.2:157–158; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-53-7).

## Letter 54.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:158–160
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Januarius that Christ gave few and simple sacraments, and that customs observed by the whole church come from the apostles or plenary councils.

### Latin text

Ad ea, quae me interrogasti, mallem prius nosse, quid interrogatus ipse responderes; ita enim uel adprobando uel emendando responsiones tuas multo breuius possem respondere et te facillime aut confirmarem aut corrigerem. hoc quidem, ut dixi, mallem. sed tamen ut nunc responderem, malui longiorem facere sermonem quam dilationem. primo itaque tenere te uolo, quod est huius disputationis caput, dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, sicut ipse in euangelio loquitur, leni iugo suo nos subdidisse et sarcinae leui. unde sacramentis numero paucissimis, obseruatione facillimis, significatione praestantissimis societatem noui populi conligauit, sicuti est baptismus trinitatis nomine consecratus, communicatio corporis et sanguinis ipsius et si quid aliud in scripturis canonicis commendatur exceptis his, quae seruitutem populi ueteris pro congruentia cordis illorum et prophetici temporis onerabant, quae et in quinque libris Moysi leguntur. illa autem, quae non scripta sed tradita custodimus, quae quidem toto terrarum orbe seruantur, datur intellegi uel ab ipsis apostolis uel plenariis conciliis, quorum est in ecclesia saluberrima auctoritas, commendata atque statuta retineri, sicuti quod domini passio et resurrectio et ascensio in caelum et aduentus de caelo spiritus sancti anniuersaria sollemnitate celebrantur et si quid aliud tale occurrit, quod seruatur ab uniuersa, quacumque se diffundit, ecclesia.

### English translation (Claude)

As to the questions you asked me, I would rather have known first what you yourself would answer if asked; for in that way, by approving or amending your answers, I could reply much more briefly and very easily either confirm or correct you. That, as I said, I would have preferred. But in order to answer now, I chose to make my discourse longer rather than delay. First, then, I want you to hold what is the main point of this discussion: that our Lord Jesus Christ, as he himself says in the gospel, has placed us under his gentle yoke and light burden. Hence he has bound together the fellowship of the new people by sacraments very few in number, very easy to observe, and most excellent in meaning, such as baptism consecrated in the name of the Trinity, the communion of his body and blood, and anything else commended in the canonical Scriptures, apart from those which burdened the servitude of the old people, suited to their hearts and to the prophetic age, which are read in the five books of Moses. But the things which we keep not by writing but by tradition, which are observed throughout the whole world, are understood to be retained as commended and established either by the apostles themselves or by plenary councils, whose authority in the church is most wholesome: such as that the Lord's passion, resurrection, and ascension into heaven, and the coming of the Holy Spirit from heaven, are celebrated with yearly solemnity, and anything else of the kind that is observed by the whole church, wherever it spreads.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Januarius, who had asked about varying church customs. Allusion to Matt 11:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.1 (CSEL 34.2:158–160; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-1).

## Letter 54.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:160
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that practices which vary locally, such as Saturday fasting and the frequency of communion, are free, and one should follow the local church.

### Latin text

Alia uero, quae per loca terrarum regionesque uariantur, sicuti est, quod alii ieiunant sabbato, alii non, alii cotidie communicant corpori et sanguini dominico, alii certis diebus accipiunt, alibi nullus dies intermittitur, quo non offeratur. alibi sabbato tantum et dominico, alibi tantum dominico et si quid aliud huius modi animaduerti potest, totum hoc genus rerum liberas habet obseruationes nec disciplina ulla est in his melior graui prudentique Christiano, nisi ut eo modo agat, quo agere uiderit ecclesiam, ad quamcumque forte deuenerit. quod enim neque contra fidem neque contra bonos mores esse conuincitur, indifferenter habendum et pro eorum, inter quos uiuitur, societate seruandum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Other things vary from place to place and region to region: for instance, some fast on Saturday, others do not; some communicate daily in the Lord's body and blood, others receive on certain days; in some places no day passes without the offering, in others only on Saturday and Sunday, in others only on Sunday; and whatever else of this kind can be noticed. This whole class of things allows free observance, and there is no better rule in them for a serious and prudent Christian than to act as he sees the church act to which he happens to come. For what is shown to be neither against faith nor against good morals is to be treated as indifferent and kept for the sake of fellowship with those among whom one lives.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.2 (CSEL 34.2:160; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-2).

## Letter 54.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:160–162
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls Ambrose's advice to Monica to follow the fasting custom of whatever church one is in, and deplores quarrels over such matters.

### Latin text

Credo te aliquando audisse, tamen etiam nunc commemoro: mater mea Mediolanium me consecuta inuenit ecclesiam sabbato non ieiunare. coeperat perturbari et fluctuari, quid ageret. tunc ego talia non curabam, sed propter ipsam consului de hac re beatissimae memoriae uirum Ambrosium. respondit nihil se docere me posse, nisi quod ipse faceret, quia, si melius nosset, id potius obseruaret, cumque ego putassem nulla reddita ratione auctoritate sola sua nos uoluisse admonere, ne sabbato ieiunaremus, subsecutus est et ait mihi: Cum Romam uenio, ieiuno sabbato; cum hic sum, non ieiuno: sic etiam tu, ad quam forte ecclesiam ueneris, eius morem serua, si cuiquam non uis esse scandalum nec quemquam tibi. hoc cum matri renuntiassem, libenter amplexa est. ego uero de hac sententia etiam atque etiam cogitans ita semper habui, tamquam eam caelesti oraculo acceperim. sensi enim saepe dolens et gemens multas infirmorum perturbationes fieri per quorundam fratrum contentiosam obstinationem uel superstitiosam timiditatem, qui in rebus huius modi, quae neque sanctae scripturae auctoritate neque uniuersalis ecclesiae traditione neque uitae corrigendae utilitate ad certum possunt terminum peruenire, tantum quia subest qualiscumque ratiocinatio cogitantis aut quia in sua patria sic ipse consueuit aut quia alibi uidit et peregrinatione sua quo remotiorem a suis eo doctiorem se factum putat, tam litigiosas excitant quaestiones, ut, nisi quod ipsi faciunt, nihil rectum aestiment.

### English translation (Claude)

I think you have heard it at some time, yet I mention it now too. My mother, having followed me to Milan, found that the church did not fast on Saturday. She began to be troubled and to waver as to what she should do. At that time I did not care about such things, but for her sake I consulted on this matter that man of most blessed memory, Ambrose. He answered that he could teach me nothing but what he himself did, because if he knew something better he would observe that instead. And when I thought that, giving no reason, he had wished to admonish us by his authority alone not to fast on Saturday, he went on and said to me: 'When I come to Rome, I fast on Saturday; when I am here, I do not fast. So you too, whatever church you come to, keep its custom, if you do not wish to be a stumbling-block to anyone or anyone to you.' When I reported this to my mother, she gladly accepted it. And I, considering this judgement again and again, have always held it as if I had received it from a heavenly oracle. For I have often perceived, with grief and groaning, that many disturbances of the weak arise from the contentious obstinacy or superstitious timidity of certain brothers, who, in matters of this kind which cannot be brought to a definite conclusion either by the authority of holy Scripture or by the tradition of the universal church or by usefulness for amending life, merely because some reasoning or other of their own lies behind it, or because they were so accustomed in their own country, or because they saw it elsewhere and think themselves the more learned the farther they have travelled from their own people, stir up such quarrelsome questions that they think nothing right but what they themselves do.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.3 (CSEL 34.2:160–162; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-3).

## Letter 54.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:162–163
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the arguments for and against daily communion and concludes that both sides honour the sacrament and should remain in peace.

### Latin text

Dixerit aliquis non cotidie accipiendam eucharistiam. quaesieris: Quare? Quoniam inquit, eligendi sunt dies, quibus purius homo continentiusque uiuit, quo ad tantum sacramentum dignus accedat; qui enim manducauerit indigne, iudicium sibi manducat et bibit. alius contra: Immo, inquit, si tanta est plaga peccati atque impetus morbi, ut medicamenta talia differenda sint, auctoritate antistitis debet quisque ab altario remoueri ad agendam paenitentiam et eadem auctoritate reconciliari - hoc est enim indigne accipere, si eo tempore accipiat, quo debet agere paenitentiam —, non ut arbitrio suo, cum libet, uel auferat se communioni uel reddat. ceterum si tanta non sunt, ut excommunicandus quisque homo iudicetur, non se debere a cotidiana medicina dominici corporis separare. rectius inter eos fortasse quispiam dirimit litem, qui monet, ut praecipue in Christi pace permaneant. faciat autem unusquisque, quod secundum fidem suam pie credit esse faciendum. neuter enim eorum exhonorat corpus et sanguinem domini, sed saluberrimum sacramentum certatim honorare contendunt. neque enim litigauerunt inter se aut quisquam eorum se alteri praeposuit Zachaeus et ille centurio, cum alter eorum gaudens in domum suam susceperit dominum, alter dixerit: Non sum dignus, ut sub tectum meum intres, ambo saluatorem honorificantes diuerso et quasi contrario modo, ambo peccatis miseri, ambo misericordiam consecuti. ualet etiam ad hanc similitudinem, quod in primo populo unicuique manna secundum propriam uoluntatem in ore sapiebat, sic uniuscuiusque in corde Christiani sacramentum illud, quo subiugatus est mundus. nam et ille honorando non audet cotidie sumere et ille honorando non audet ullo die praetermittere. contemptum solum non uult cibus iste sicut manna fastidium. inde enim et apostolus indigne dicit acceptum ab eis, qui hoc non discernebant a ceteris cibis ueneratione singulariter debita; continuo quippe, cum dixisset: Iudicium sibi manducat et bibit, addidit, ut diceret: Non diiudicans corpus, quod satis toto ipso loco in epistula ad Corinthios prima, si diligenter adtendatur, apparet.

### English translation (Claude)

Someone may say that the Eucharist should not be received daily. You ask: 'Why?' 'Because,' he says, 'days should be chosen on which a man lives more purely and continently, so that he may approach so great a sacrament worthily; for he who eats unworthily eats and drinks judgement on himself.' Another, on the contrary, says: 'No; if the wound of sin and the violence of the disease are so great that such medicines must be put off, then each one ought to be removed from the altar by the bishop's authority to do penance, and be reconciled by the same authority (for to receive unworthily is to receive at a time when one ought to be doing penance), not that by his own choice he should withdraw from communion or return to it whenever he likes. But if his sins are not so great that he should be judged worthy of excommunication, he ought not to separate himself from the daily medicine of the Lord's body.' Perhaps someone settles the dispute between them more rightly who advises that they should above all remain in the peace of Christ, and that each should do what, according to his faith, he piously believes should be done. For neither of them dishonours the body and blood of the Lord; rather they vie with each other in honouring the most saving sacrament. Nor did Zacchaeus and that centurion quarrel with each other, or either of them put himself above the other, when one of them joyfully received the Lord into his house, and the other said, 'I am not worthy that you should come under my roof': both honouring the Saviour in different and as it were opposite ways, both wretched through sins, both obtaining mercy. It is also relevant to this comparison that among the first people the manna tasted in each one's mouth according to his own wish; so in each Christian's heart does that sacrament by which the world has been subdued. For the one out of honour does not dare to receive it daily, and the other out of honour does not dare to let any day pass. This food will not be despised, just as the manna would not be loathed. Hence the apostle says that it was received unworthily by those who did not distinguish it from other food by the veneration singularly due to it; for immediately after saying, 'He eats and drinks judgement on himself,' he added, 'not discerning the body'; which is clear enough from that whole passage in the first letter to the Corinthians, if it is carefully considered.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 19:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:8: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 16:20–21 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Cor 11:29 and Matt 8:8; allusion to Luke 19:6. The legend that the manna tasted as each wished is from Wis 16:20–21. 'Penance' here is the church's public discipline.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.4 (CSEL 34.2:162–163; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-4).

## Letter 54.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:163–164
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine illustrates the folly of insisting on one's home custom with examples about the Lenten fast and the Maundy Thursday Eucharist.

### Latin text

Sic aliquis peregrinus in eo forte loco, ubi perseueranter in obseruatione quadragesimae nec quinta sabbati lauant relaxantue ieiunium: "Non" inquit, hodie ieiunabo. quaeritur causa, quia non fit, inquit, in patria mea. quid aliud iste nisi consuetudinem suam consuetudini alterius praeponere conatur? non enim mihi de libro dei hoc recitaturus est aut uniuersae, qua dilatatur, ecclesiae plena uoce certabit aut ostendet illum contra fidem facere, se autem secundum fidem, moresque hinc optimos aut illum uiolare aut se custodire conuincet. uiolant sane quietem et pacem suam de superflua quaestione rixando. mallem tamen in rebus huius modi, ut et ille in huius et hic in illius patria ab eo, quod ceteri faciunt, non abhorreret. siue etiam in aliena patria cum peregrinaretur, ubi maior et frequentior et feruentior est populus dei, uidit uerbi gratia bis offerri quinta sabbati ultimae quadragesimae et mane et ad uesperam ueniensque in patriam suam, ubi in fine diei mos est offerri, male atque inlicite fieri contendat, quoniam alibi aliter ipse uiderit, puerilis est iste sensus cauendus in nobis, tolerandus et corrigendus in nostris.

### English translation (Claude)

So too some stranger, perhaps in a place where, keeping Lent strictly, they do not bathe or break the fast even on the Thursday, says: 'I will not fast today.' The reason is asked. 'Because,' he says, 'it is not done in my country.' What else is he trying to do but put his own custom above another's? For he will not read this to me from the book of God, or contend for it with the full voice of the universal church wherever it spreads, or show that the other acts against faith and he according to faith, or prove that the other violates the best morals and he keeps them. They certainly violate their own quiet and peace by quarrelling over a superfluous question. But in such matters I would rather that each, in the other's country, did not shrink from what the rest do. Or again, if when travelling in a foreign country, where the people of God are more numerous, more frequent in attendance, and more fervent, he has seen, for example, the offering made twice on the Thursday of the last week of Lent, both in the morning and in the evening, and on coming to his own country, where the custom is to offer at the end of the day, he contends that this is done wrongly and unlawfully because he has seen it done otherwise elsewhere: this is a childish attitude, to be avoided in ourselves and to be tolerated and corrected in our people.

### Translation notes

- 'Thursday' renders 'the fifth day of the week' (quinta sabbati).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.5 (CSEL 34.2:163–164; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-5).

## Letter 54.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:164–166
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine classifies the question of the Maundy Thursday Eucharist as a local custom, in which each should follow the church he is in.

### Latin text

Prima ergo inquisitio tua, quam in commonitorio posuisti, ex quo trium istorum generum sit, adtende. quaeris enim his uerbis: Quid per quintam feriam ultimae hebdomadis quadragesimae fieri debeat? an offerendum sit mane et rursus post cenam propter illud, quod dictum est: Similiter postquam cenatum est, an ieiunandum et post cenam tantum modo offerendum, an etiam ieiunandum et post oblationem, sicut facere solemus, cenandum? ad haec itaque ita respondeo, ut, quid horum sit faciendum, si diuinae scripturae praescribit auctoritas, non sit dubitandum, quin ita facere debeamus, ut legimus, ut iam non quo modo faciendum sed quo modo sacramentum intellegendum sit, disputemus; similiter etiam, si quid horum tota per orbem frequentat ecclesia; nam et hinc, quin ita faciendum sit, dubitare insolentissimae insaniae est. sed neque hoc neque illud est in eo, quod tu quaeris. restat igitur, ut de illo tertio genere sit, quod per loca regionesque uariatur. faciat ergo quisque, quod in ea ecclesia, in quam uenit, inuenit. non enim quicquam eorum contra fidem est aut mores fiunt hinc uel inde meliores. his enim causis, id est aut propter fidem aut propter mores uel emendari oportet, quod perperam fiebat, uel institui, quod non fiebat. ipsa quippe mutatio consuetudinis, etiam quae utilitate adiuuat, nouitate perturbat. quapropter quae utilis non est, perturbatione infructuosa et consequenter noxia est.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider, then, to which of these three classes your first question belongs, which you put in your memorandum. For you ask in these words: 'What ought to be done on the Thursday of the last week of Lent? Should the offering be made in the morning and again after supper, because of what is said, Likewise, after supper; or should we fast and offer only after supper; or should we also fast and, after the offering, take supper, as we are accustomed to do?' To this I answer thus: if the authority of divine Scripture prescribes which of these should be done, there is no doubt that we must do as we read, so that we may argue no longer how it is to be done but how the sacrament is to be understood. Likewise, if the whole church throughout the world practises any of these; for to doubt that it should be done so would be most arrogant madness. But neither the one nor the other applies to what you ask. It remains, then, that it belongs to the third class, which varies from place to place and region to region. Let each, then, do what he finds in the church to which he comes. For none of these is against faith, nor are morals made better by one or the other. For these are the reasons, namely faith or morals, for which either what was done wrongly should be amended or what was not done should be instituted. For the very change of a custom, even one that helps by its usefulness, disturbs by its novelty. Therefore a change that is not useful is, by its fruitless disturbance, consequently harmful.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:25: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 22:20: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Januarius quotes 1 Cor 11:25 (cf. Luke 22:20).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.6 (CSEL 34.2:164–166; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-6).

## Letter 54.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:166
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains how the custom of an evening Eucharist after a meal on Maundy Thursday may have arisen from the gospel accounts of the Last Supper.

### Latin text

Nec ideo putari debet institutum esse multis locis, ut illa die post refectionem offeratur, quia scriptum est: Identidem et calicem post cenam dicens; ipsam enim potuit appellare cenam, quod iam corpus acceperant, ut deinde calicem acciperent. nam quia alibi dicit: Conuenientibus ergo uobis in unum non est dominicam cenam manducare hanc ipsam acceptionem eucharistiae dominicam cenam uocans, illud magis mouere potuit homines, ut iam refecti die illo uel offerrent uel sumerent eucharistiam, quod in euangelio dicit: Cum autem illi manducarent, accepit Iesus panem et benedixit, cum etiam superius dixisset: Cum sero autem factum esset, recumbebat cum duodecim et manducantibus eis dixit: Quoniam unus ex uobis tradet me; post enim tradidit sacramentum. et liquido apparet, quando primo acceperunt discipuli corpus et sanguinem domini, non eos accepisse ieiunos.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it be thought that the practice of offering on that day after a meal was instituted in many places because it is written, 'In the same way also the cup after supper, saying'; for he could have called 'supper' the fact that they had already received the body, so that they then received the cup. For since he says elsewhere, 'When you come together, then, it is not to eat the Lord's supper,' calling this very reception of the Eucharist the Lord's supper, what may rather have moved people to offer or receive the Eucharist on that day after eating is what the gospel says: 'While they were eating, Jesus took bread and blessed it,' having said earlier: 'When evening came, he reclined with the twelve; and as they were eating he said, One of you will betray me.' For afterwards he gave the sacrament. And it is clear that when the disciples first received the body and blood of the Lord, they did not receive it fasting.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Cor 11:25; 1 Cor 11:20; Matt 26:26; Matt 26:20–21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.7 (CSEL 34.2:166; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-7).

## Letter 54.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:166–168
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends the universal custom of receiving the Eucharist fasting, which he attributes to the apostles' ordering of the church.

### Latin text

Numquid tamen propterea calumniandum est uniuersae ecclesiae, quod a ieiunis semper accipitur? ex hoc enim placuit spiritui sancto, ut in honorem tanti sacramenti in os Christiani prius dominicum corpus intraret quam ceteri cibi; nam ideo per uniuersum orbem mos iste seruatur. neque enim quia post cibos dedit dominus, propterea pransi aut cenati fratres ad illud sacramentum accipiendum conuenire debeant aut, sicut faciebant, quos apostolus arguit et emendat, mensis suis ista miscere. namque saluator quo uehementius commendaret mysterii illius altitudinem, ultimum hoc uoluit infigere cordibus et memoriae discipulorum, a quibus ad passionem digressurus erat. et ideo non praecepit, quo deinceps ordine sumeretur, ut apostolis, per quos ecclesias dispositurus erat, sacraret hunc locum. nam si hoc ille monuisset, ut post cibos alios semper acciperetur, credo, quod eum morem nemo uariasset. cum uero ait apostolus de hoc sacramento loquens: Propter quod, fratres, cum conuenitis ad manducandum, inuicem expectate; si quis esurit, domi manducet, ut non ad iudicium conueniatis, statim subtexuit: Cetera autem, cum uenero, ordinabo. unde intellegi datur, quia multum erat, ut in epistula totum illis agendi ordinem insinuaret, quae uniuersa per orbem seruat ecclesia, ab ipso ordinatum esse, quod nulla morum diuersitate uariatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Must we then slander the universal church because the sacrament is always received by those fasting? For from this it pleased the Holy Spirit that, in honour of so great a sacrament, the Lord's body should enter a Christian's mouth before other food; for that is why this custom is kept throughout the whole world. For it does not follow that, because the Lord gave it after food, the brothers should come together to receive that sacrament after lunch or supper, or mix it with their own meals, as those did whom the apostle rebukes and corrects. For the Saviour, to commend more forcefully the depth of that mystery, wished to fix this last in the hearts and memory of the disciples, from whom he was about to depart to his passion. And therefore he did not prescribe in what order it should be received thereafter, so that he might reserve this matter for the apostles, through whom he was going to order the churches. For if he had advised that it always be received after other food, I believe no one would have changed that custom. But when the apostle says, speaking of this sacrament, 'Therefore, brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for one another; if anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, so that you may not come together for judgement,' he at once adds: 'The rest I will set in order when I come.' From this we are given to understand that, since it was too much to set out in a letter the whole order of practice which the universal church throughout the world observes, what is not varied by any diversity of customs was set in order by him.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:34: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Cor 11:33–34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.8 (CSEL 34.2:166–168; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-8).

## Letter 54.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:168
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts an evening Eucharist after a meal on Maundy Thursday and explains the double celebration by the custom of bathing that day.

### Latin text

Sed nonnullos probabilis quaedam ratio delectauit: uno certo die per annum, quo ipsam cenam dominus dedit, tamquam ad insigniorem commemorationem post cibos offerri et accipi liceat corpus et sanguinem domini. honestius autem arbitror ea hora fieri, ut, qui etiam ieiunauerit, post refectionem, quae hora nona fit, ad oblationem possit occurrere. quapropter neminem cogimus ante dominicam illam cenam prandere, sed nulli etiam contradicere audemus. hoc tamen non arbitror institutum, nisi quia plures et prope omnes in plerisque locis eo die lauare consueuerunt, et, quia nonnulli etiam ieiunium custodiunt, mane offertur propter prandentes, quia ieiunia simul et lauacra tolerare non possunt, ad uesperam uero propter ieiunantes.

### English translation (Claude)

But a certain plausible reason has pleased some: that on one fixed day in the year, on which the Lord gave that supper, as for a more notable commemoration, it may be permitted to offer and receive the body and blood of the Lord after food. But I think it more fitting that it be done at such an hour that one who has fasted may come to the offering after the meal which is taken at the ninth hour. Therefore we compel no one to take lunch before that Lord's supper, but neither do we dare to oppose anyone. I think, however, that this was instituted only because more people, almost all in most places, are accustomed to bathe on that day; and because some also keep the fast, the offering is made in the morning for those who take lunch, since they cannot bear fasting and bathing at the same time, and in the evening for those who fast.

### Translation notes

- The ninth hour is about 3 p.m.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.9 (CSEL 34.2:168; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-9).

## Letter 54.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:168–169
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine suggests that bathing on Maundy Thursday began with the candidates for Easter baptism, and promises to answer Januarius's other questions later.

### Latin text

Si autem quaeris, cur etiam lauandi mos ortus sit, nihil mihi de hac re cogitanti probabilius occurrit, nisi quia baptizandorum corpora per obseruationem quadragesimae sordidata cum offensione sensus ad fontem uenirent, nisi aliqua die lauarentur. istum autem diem potius ad hoc electum, quo cena dominica anniuersarie celebratur. et quia concessum est hoc baptismum accepturis, multi cum his lauare uoluerunt ieiuniumque laxare. His, ut potui, disputatis moneo, ut ea, quae praelocutus sum, serues, quantum potes, ut decet ecclesiae prudentem ac pacificum filium. alia quae interrogasti, si dominus uoluerit, alio tempore expediam.

### English translation (Claude)

If you also ask why the custom of bathing arose, nothing more probable occurs to me in thinking about it than that the bodies of those to be baptized, made dirty through the observance of Lent, would come to the font offending the senses unless they bathed on some day. And this day was chosen for the purpose rather than another, because on it the Lord's supper is celebrated each year. And because this was allowed to those about to receive baptism, many wished to bathe with them and relax the fast. Having discussed these things as I could, I advise you to keep what I said at the beginning, as far as you can, as befits a prudent and peaceable son of the church. The other things you asked I will deal with at another time, if the Lord wills.

### Translation notes

- The other questions are answered in Letter 55.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 54.10 (CSEL 34.2:168–169; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-54-10).

## Letter 55.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-55-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:169–170
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his answer to Januarius's remaining questions.

### Latin text

Lectis litteris tuis, ubi me commonuisti, ut debitum redderem de residuis enodandis quaestionibus, quas iam longe ante quaesiueras, gratissimum mihi atque carissimum desiderium studii tui amplius differri tolerare non potui et quamuis in mediis aceruis occupationum mearum hanc feci praecipuam, ut ad ea, quae interrogasti, responderem tibi. diutius autem de tua epistula disputare nolo, ne hoc ipsum me impediat iam tandem redhibere, quod debeo.

### English translation (Claude)

When I read your letter, in which you reminded me to pay my debt by unravelling the remaining questions which you had asked long before, I could not bear any longer to put off the most welcome and dear desire of your zeal; and although I am in the midst of heaps of occupations, I have made this my chief one, to answer what you asked. I do not want to discuss your letter at length, lest this very thing hinder me from at last paying what I owe.

### Translation notes

- To Januarius; continues Letter 54.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.1 (CSEL 34.2:169–170; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-55-1).

## Letter 55.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-55-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:170–171
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christmas is a simple commemoration, whereas Easter is a sacrament signifying the passage from death to life, as the Hebrew word pascha means.

### Latin text

Quaeris, quae causa sit, cur anniuersarius dies celebrandae dominicae passionis non ad eundem redeat anni diem sicut dies, qua traditur natus, et deinde subiungis, si hoc fit propter sabbatum et lunam, quid sibi uelit in hac re obseruatio sabbati et lunae. hic primum oportet noueris diem natalis domini non in sacramento celebrari, sed tantum in memoriam reuocari, quod natus sit, ac per hoc nihil opus erat, nisi reuolutum diem anni, quo ipsa res facta est, festa deuotione signari. sacramentum est autem in aliqua celebratione, cum rei gestae commemoratio ita fit, ut aliquid etiam significare intellegatur, quod sancte accipiendum est. eo itaque modo agimus pascha, ut non solum, quod factum est, in memoriam reuocemus, id est quod mortuus Christus et resurrexit, sed etiam cetera, quae circa eum adtestantur, ad sacramentorum significationem non omittamus. quia enim, sicut dicit apostolus, mortuus est propter delicta nostra et resurrexit propter iustificationem nostram, transitus quidam de morte ad uitam in illa passione domini et resurrectione sacratus est. nam etiam uocabulum ipsum, quod pascha dicitur, non Graecum, sicut uulgo uideri solet, sed Hebraeum esse dicunt, qui linguam utramque nouerunt. neque enim a passione, quoniam πάσχειν Graece dicitur pati, sed ab eo, quod transitur, ut dixi, a morte ad uitam, Hebraeo uerbo res appellata est. in quo eloquio pascha transitus dicitur, sicut perhibent, qui haec sciunt. quod uoluit et ipse dominus tangere, cum ait: Qui credit in me, transiit a morte ad uitam. et maxime idem euangelista hoc intellegitur exprimere uoluisse, cum celebraturo domino pascha cum discipulis, ubi cenam eis mysticam dedit: Cum uidisset, inquit, Iesus, quia uenit hora, ut transiret de hoc mundo ad patrem. transitus ergo de hac uita mortali in aliam uitam inmortalem, hoc est enim de morte ad uitam in passione et in resurrectione domini commendatur.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask why the yearly day for celebrating the Lord's passion does not return to the same day of the year, as the day on which he is said to have been born does; and then you add: if this is done because of the sabbath and the moon, what is the meaning of observing the sabbath and the moon in this matter? Here you should know first that the Lord's birthday is not celebrated as a sacrament, but only recalled to memory, namely that he was born; and so nothing was needed but to mark with festive devotion the day of the year on which the event took place, as it comes round. But there is a sacrament in a celebration when the commemoration of the event is made in such a way that it is also understood to signify something that is to be received with reverence. So we keep Easter in such a way that we not only recall to memory what happened, that is, that Christ died and rose again, but also do not omit the other things attested concerning him for the meaning of the sacraments. For since, as the apostle says, he died for our sins and rose again for our justification, a certain passage from death to life has been consecrated in that passion and resurrection of the Lord. For even the word itself, 'pascha', is not Greek, as is commonly thought, but Hebrew, according to those who know both languages. For the thing was not named from suffering, because in Greek 'to suffer' is paschein, but from the fact that there is a passing over, as I said, from death to life, by a Hebrew word; in that language pascha means 'passage', as those who know these things affirm. The Lord himself wished to touch on this when he said: 'He who believes in me has passed from death to life.' And the same evangelist is understood to have wished to express this especially when, as the Lord was about to celebrate the Passover with his disciples, at which he gave them the mystical supper, he says: 'When Jesus saw that his hour had come to pass from this world to the Father.' So the passage from this mortal life into another, immortal life, that is, from death to life, is set forth in the passion and resurrection of the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Rom 4:25: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:24: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Rom 4:25; allusion to John 5:24; quotation of John 13:1. The Greek word, garbled in the digital text, is restored as πάσχειν.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.2 (CSEL 34.2:170–171; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/52-1/#p-55-2).

## Letter 55.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:171–173
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that our passage from death to life begins now in faith and baptism and will be completed in the resurrection of the body.

### Latin text

Hic transitus a nobis modo agitur per fidem, quae nobis est in remissionem peccatorum, in spe uitae aeternae diligentibus deum et proximum, quia fides per dilectionem operatur et iustus ex fide uiuit; spes autem quae uidetur, non est spes; quod enim uidet quis, quid sperat? si autem, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus. secundum hanc fidem et spem et dilectionem, qua coepimus esse sub gratia, iam commortui sumus cum Christo et consepulti illi per baptismum, sicut dicit apostolus: Quia et uetus homo noster simul crucifixus est cruci cum illo; et resurreximus cum illo, quia et simul nos excitauit et simul sedere fecit in caelestibus. unde est et illa exhortatio: Quae sursum sunt sapite, non quae super terram. sed quia sequitur et dicit: Mortui enim estis et uita uestra abscondita est cum Christo in deo; cum Christus apparuerit uita uestra, tunc et uos apparebitis cum illo in gloria, satis indicat, quid uelit intellegi, quia nunc transitus noster de morte ad uitam, qui fit per fidem, spe peragitur futurae in fine resurrectionis et gloriae, cum corruptibile hoc, id est caro ista, in qua gemimus modo, induet incorruptionem et mortale hoc induerit inmortalitatem. nunc enim iam quidem habemus per fidem primitias spiritus, sed adhuc in nobismet ipsis ingemescimus adoptionem expectantes, redemptionem corporis nostri; spe enim salui facti sumus. in hac spe cum sumus, corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem uita est propter iustitiam. sed uide, quid sequitur: Si autem spiritus eius, inquit, qui suscitauit Christum a mortuis, habitat in uobis, qui suscitauit Christum a mortuis, uiuificabit et mortalia corpora uestra per inhabitantem spiritum eius in uobis. hoc igitur uniuersa ecclesia, quae in peregrinatione mortalitatis inuenta est, expectat in fine saeculi, quod in domini nostri Iesu Christi corpore praemonstratum est, qui est primogenitus a mortuis, quia et corpus eius, cui caput est ipse, non nisi ecclesia est.

### English translation (Claude)

This passage is accomplished by us now through faith, which is ours for the forgiveness of sins, in the hope of eternal life, as we love God and our neighbour; because faith works through love, and the righteous lives by faith; but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience. According to this faith, hope, and love, by which we have begun to be under grace, we have already died with Christ and been buried with him through baptism, as the apostle says: 'For our old man was crucified together with him'; and we have risen with him, because he has raised us up together and made us sit together in the heavenly places. Hence also that exhortation: 'Set your mind on the things above, not on the things on earth.' But since he goes on to say, 'For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God; when Christ your life appears, then you too will appear with him in glory,' he shows clearly enough what he wishes to be understood: that our passage from death to life now, which is made by faith, is carried out in the hope of the resurrection and glory to come at the end, when this corruptible, that is, this flesh in which we now groan, puts on incorruption, and this mortal puts on immortality. For now we have indeed through faith the firstfruits of the Spirit, but we still groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body; for in hope we have been saved. While we are in this hope, the body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. But see what follows: 'If the Spirit of him who raised Christ from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit dwelling in you.' This, then, is what the whole church, found in the pilgrimage of mortality, waits for at the end of the age: what was shown beforehand in the body of our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the firstborn from the dead; because his body too, of which he himself is the head, is nothing other than the church.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:6: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:11: quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Gal 5:6; Rom 1:17 (Hab 2:4); Rom 8:24–25; Rom 6:4, 6; Eph 2:6; Col 3:1–4; 1 Cor 15:53–54; Rom 8:23–24; Rom 8:10–11; Col 1:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.3 (CSEL 34.2:171–173; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-3).

## Letter 55.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:173–174
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains against those who said the resurrection had already happened that our rising with Christ is now in hope, with the body's redemption still to come.

### Latin text

Nonnulli enim adtendentes uerba, quae assidue dicit apostolus, quia et mortui sumus cum Christo et resurreximus cum eo, nec intellegentes, quatenus dicantur, arbitrati sunt iam factam esse resurrectionem nec ullam ulterius in fine temporum esse sperandam, ex quibus est, inquit, Hymenaeus et Philetus, qui circa ueritatem aberrauerunt dicentes resurrectionem iam factam esse et fidem quorundam subuertunt. idem apostolus eos arguens detestatur, qui tamen dicit nos resurrexisse cum Christo. unde, nisi quia hoc per fidem et spem et dilectionem factum esse dicit in nobis secundum primitias spiritus? sed quia spes, quae uidetur, non est spes et ideo, si, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus, restat utique redemptio corporis nostri, quam expectantes in nobismet ipsis ingemescimus. unde est illud: Spe gaudentes, in tribulatione patientes.

### English translation (Claude)

For some, attending to the words which the apostle constantly uses, that we have died with Christ and risen with him, and not understanding in what sense they are said, thought that the resurrection had already taken place and that none was to be hoped for later at the end of time. 'Among them,' he says, 'are Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have swerved from the truth, saying that the resurrection has already taken place, and are overturning the faith of some.' The same apostle rebukes and denounces them, though he says that we have risen with Christ. Why, except that he says this has happened in us through faith, hope, and love, according to the firstfruits of the Spirit? But since hope that is seen is not hope, and therefore, if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience, there certainly remains the redemption of our body, waiting for which we groan within ourselves. Hence that saying: 'Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation.'

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:17: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 2 Tim 2:17–18, Rom 8:24–25, and Rom 12:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.4 (CSEL 34.2:173–174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-4).

## Letter 55.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:174–175
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Easter falls in the first month, the month of new things, and in the third week of the moon, signifying the third age, that of grace.

### Latin text

Haec igitur innouatio uitae nostrae est quidam transitus de morte ad uitam, qui fit primo per fidem, ut in spe gaudeamus et in tribulatione patientes simus, dum adhuc exterior homo noster corrumpitur, sed interior renouatur de die in diem. propter ipsum initium nouae uitae, propter nouum hominem, quem iubemur induere et exuere ueterem expurgantes uetus fermentum, ut simus noua consparsio, quoniam pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus, propter hanc ergo uitae nouitatem primus mensis in anni mensibus celebrationi huic adtributus est. nam ipse dicitur et mensis nouorum. quia uero in toto tempore saeculi nunc tertium tempus apparuit, ideo resurrectio domini triduana est. primum enim tempus est ante legem, secundum sub lege, tertium sub gratia, ubi iam manifestatio est sacramenti prius occulti in prophetico aenigmate. hoc ergo et in lunari numero significatur; quia enim septenarius numerus solet in scripturis ad quandam perfectionem mysticus apparere, tertia hebdomade lunae pascha celebratur, id est qui dies occurrit a quarta decima in uicesimam primam.

### English translation (Claude)

This renewal of our life, then, is a certain passage from death to life, which is made first through faith, so that we rejoice in hope and are patient in tribulation, while our outer man is still decaying, but the inner man is being renewed day by day. Because of this very beginning of new life, because of the new man whom we are commanded to put on, putting off the old, purging out the old leaven so that we may be a new lump, since Christ our Passover has been sacrificed: because of this newness of life, then, the first month among the months of the year has been assigned to this celebration. For it is also called the month of new things. And since in the whole course of the age a third time has now appeared, therefore the Lord's resurrection is on the third day. For the first time is before the law, the second under the law, the third under grace, in which there is now the manifestation of the sacrament formerly hidden in prophetic riddle. This, then, is also signified in the number of the moon; for since the number seven usually appears in the Scriptures as mystical, pointing to a certain perfection, Easter is celebrated in the third week of the moon, that is, on the day that falls between the fourteenth and the twenty-first.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:22: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:24: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:7: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 12:2: allusion, medium confidence
- Deut 16:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Rom 12:12; 2 Cor 4:16; Eph 4:22–24; 1 Cor 5:7; Exod 12:2 and Deut 16:1 (the 'month of new things', Abib).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.5 (CSEL 34.2:174–175; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-5).

## Letter 55.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:175–176
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns to the moon's phases, ridiculing the Manichaean doctrine that the moon fills with liberated particles of God.

### Latin text

Est illic et aliud sacramentum, quod si tibi obscurum fuerit, quia in talibus inquisitionibus minus eruditus es, non contristeris nec ideo me putes esse meliorem, quia haec in studiis puerilibus didici; qui enim gloriatur, in domino glorietur scire et intellegere, quoniam ego sum dominus. nonnulli ergo studiosi talium rerum quaesiuerunt multa de numeris et motibus siderum et, qui subtilius ista scrutati sunt, incrementa et decrementa lunaria ex conuersione globi eius coniecerunt, non quod aliquid substantiae uel accedat ei, cum augetur, uel recedat, cum minuitur, quod delira inperitia Manichaei opinantes repleri eam dixerunt, sicut repletur nauis, ex fugitiua dei parte, quam commixtam principibus tenebrarum et eorum sordibus inquinatam corde atque ore sacrilego et credere et loqui non dubitant. hinc ergo impleri lunam dicunt, cum eadem pars dei magnis laboribus ab inquinamento purgata de toto mundo atque ab omnibus cloacis fugiens redditur deo lugenti, dum redeat; repleri uero per mensem dimidium et alio dimidio in solem refundi uelut in aliam nauem. nec tamen inter istas anathemandas blasphemias aliquid umquam fingere potuerunt, cur uel incipiens lucere uel desinens corniculato lumine fulgeat aut cur a dimidio mense incipiat minui et non ad refundendum plena perueniat.

### English translation (Claude)

There is another sacrament there too; and if it is obscure to you, because you are less learned in such inquiries, do not be saddened, nor think me better on that account, because I learned these things in my boyhood studies; for let him who boasts boast in this, that he knows and understands that I am the Lord. Some students of such matters, then, have inquired much about the numbers and motions of the stars, and those who have examined these things more subtly have inferred the waxing and waning of the moon from the turning of its globe; not that any substance is added to it when it increases or taken away when it decreases, as the Manichees, holding this out of mad ignorance, have said that it is filled, as a ship is filled, from the fugitive part of God, which they do not hesitate to believe and declare, with sacrilegious heart and mouth, to be mixed with the princes of darkness and defiled by their filth. So they say that the moon is filled when that same part of God, purged from defilement by great labours, fleeing from the whole world and from all the sewers, is returned to God, who mourns until it returns; and that it is filled during half a month and in the other half poured out into the sun as into another ship. Yet amid these blasphemies, which are to be anathematized, they have never been able to invent any reason why, either when beginning to shine or when ceasing, it gleams with a horned light, or why it begins to diminish from the middle of the month and does not arrive full at the pouring out.

### Scripture references

- Jer 9:24: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Jer 9:24 (cf. 1 Cor 1:31). The Manichaean cosmology is described as Augustine reports it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.6 (CSEL 34.2:175–176; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-6).

## Letter 55.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:176–177
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the astronomers' two explanations of the moon's phases and notes that in either case it waxes as it moves away from the sun.

### Latin text

Illi autem, qui haec certis numeris indagarunt, ita ut defectus solis et lunae non solum cur fierent, sed etiam quando futuri essent, longe ante praedicerent et eos determinatis interuallis temporum canonica supputatione praefigerent litterisque mandarent, quas modo qui legunt atque intellegunt, nihilo minus eos praedicunt nec aliter aut alias accidunt, quam praedicunt, tales ergo, quibus non est ignoscendum, sicut scriptura sancta dicit, quia, cum tantum ualerent, ut possent aestimare saeculum, dominum eius, quem supplici pietate possent, non facilius inuenerunt, ex ipsis cornibus lunae, quae a sole auersa sunt, siue crescentis siue decrescentis coniecerunt uel a sole inlustrari et, quanto magis ab eo recederet, tanto magis ab ea parte, quae terris apparet, radios eius excipere, quanto autem ad eum magis post dimidium mensem ex alio semicirculo propinquaret, tanto magis a superiori parte inlustratam ab ea parte, quam terris aduerteret, non posse excipere radios et propterea uideri decrescere, uel, si haberet suum lumen, id habere ex una parte in hemisphaerio, quam partem cum recedens a sole paulatim terris ostenderet, donec totam ostenderet, quasi augmenta monstrare, dum non addatur, quod deerat, sed prodatur, quod inerat, ac rursus paulatim abscondere, quod patebat, et ideo uideri decrescere. sed quodlibet horum duorum sit, illud certe manifestum est et cuiuis aduertenti facile cognitum, quod luna non augeatur ad oculos nostros nisi a sole recedendo neque minuatur nisi ad solem ei parte alia propinquando.

### English translation (Claude)

But those who have investigated these things by sure numbers, so that they predicted long beforehand not only why eclipses of the sun and moon happened but also when they would occur, and fixed them at determined intervals of time by regular calculation and committed them to writing, so that those who now read and understand those writings predict them no less, and they happen neither otherwise nor at other times than they predict; such men, who are not to be pardoned, as holy Scripture says, because, though they had so much power that they could assess the world, they did not more easily find its Lord, whom they could have found by humble piety: from the very horns of the moon, which are turned away from the sun whether it is waxing or waning, they inferred either that it is illuminated by the sun, and the farther it moves away from it, the more it receives its rays on the side visible to the earth; and the nearer it approaches it after the middle of the month from the other semicircle, the more, being illuminated on its upper side, it cannot receive the rays on the side it turns toward the earth, and so seems to wane; or else, if it has its own light, that it has it on one half of its sphere, and as it moves away from the sun it gradually shows that part to the earth, until it shows the whole, as if displaying increase, while what was lacking is not added, but what was there is revealed; and again gradually hides what was visible, and so seems to wane. But whichever of these two is true, this at least is plain and easily known to anyone who pays attention: that the moon does not increase to our eyes except by moving away from the sun, nor decrease except by approaching the sun on its other side.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 13:8–9 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Wis 13:8–9 ('not to be pardoned ... could assess the world').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.7 (CSEL 34.2:176–177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-7).

## Letter 55.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:177–179
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares Christ to the unchanging sun and fallen humanity to the changing moon, which grows bright inwardly as it turns to the true Sun.

### Latin text

Adtende nunc, quod in prouerbiis legimus: Sapiens sicut sol permanet, stultus autem sicut luna mutatur. et quis est sapiens, qui permanet, nisi sol ille iustitiae, de quo dicitur: Ortus est mihi iustitiae sol, et quem sibi non fuisse ortum in die nouissima plangentes impii dicturi sunt: Et iustitiae lumen non inluxit nobis et sol non ortus est nobis? nam istum carnis oculis uisibilem solem oriri facit super bonos et malos deus, qui etiam pluit super iustos et iniustos. ducuntur autem semper ex rebus uisibilibus ad inuisibilia congruae similitudines. quis ergo est ille stultus, qui tamquam luna mutatur, nisi Adam, in quo omnes peccauerunt? anima quippe humana recedens a sole iustitiae, ab illa scilicet interna contemplatione incommutabilis ueritatis, omnes uires suas in terrena conuertit et eo magis magisque obscuratur in interioribus ac superioribus suis: sed cum redire coeperit ad illam incommutabilem sapientiam, quanto magis ei propinquat affectu pietatis, tanto magis exterior homo corrumpitur, sed interior renouatur de die in diem omnisque lux illa ingenii, quae ad inferiora uergebat, ad superiora conuertitur et a terrenis quodam modo aufertur, ut magis magisque huic saeculo moriatur et uita eius abscondatur cum Christo in deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Now consider what we read in Proverbs: 'The wise man remains like the sun, but the fool changes like the moon.' And who is the wise man who remains, but that Sun of righteousness of whom it is said, 'The sun of righteousness has risen for me,' and of whom the ungodly, lamenting on the last day that he did not rise for them, will say, 'And the light of righteousness did not shine on us, and the sun did not rise for us'? For this sun, visible to the eyes of the flesh, God makes to rise on the good and the bad, who also sends rain on the just and the unjust. Fitting comparisons are always drawn from visible things to invisible. Who, then, is that fool who changes like the moon, but Adam, in whom all sinned? For the human soul, withdrawing from the Sun of righteousness, that is, from that inner contemplation of unchangeable truth, turns all its powers to earthly things and is darkened more and more in its inner and higher parts; but when it begins to return to that unchangeable wisdom, the nearer it approaches it with the affection of piety, the more the outer man decays but the inner man is renewed day by day, and all that light of the mind which was inclined to lower things is turned to higher things and is in a way withdrawn from earthly things, so that it dies more and more to this world and its life is hidden with Christ in God.

### Scripture references

- Mal 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:45: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:3: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 27:11 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 5:6 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotation 'The wise man remains like the sun' is Sir 27:11 (Augustine says Proverbs). Other quotations: Mal 4:2 (cf. 'has risen for me'); Wis 5:6; Matt 5:45; Rom 5:12; 2 Cor 4:16; Col 3:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.8 (CSEL 34.2:177–179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-8).

## Letter 55.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:179–180
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Easter begins at the fourteenth moon, when the moon turns toward the sun, signifying the soul's conversion to inward things.

### Latin text

Mutatur ergo in deterius ad exteriora progrediens et in uita sua proiciens intima sua; et hoc terrae, id est eis, qui terrena sapiunt, melius uidetur, cum laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae et, qui iniqua gerit, benedicitur. mutatur autem in melius, cum intentionem et gloriam suam a terrenis, quae in hoc saeculo apparent, paulatim auertit et ad superiora atque interiora conuertit; et hoc terrae, id est eis, qui terrena sapiunt, deterius uidetur. unde illi impii postremam infructuosam agentes paenitentiam etiam hoc inter multa dicturi sunt: Hi sunt, quos aliquando habuimus in risum et in similitudinem improperii; nos insensati uitam illorum aestimabamus insaniam. ac per hoc spiritus sanctus de uisibilibus ad inuisibilia et de corporalibus ad spiritalia sacramenta similitudinem ducens transitum illum de alia uita in aliam uitam, quod pascha nominatur, a quarta decima luna uoluit obseruari, ut non solum propter tempus tertium, quod supra commemoraui, quia inde incipit hebdomada tertia, sed etiam propter ipsam conuersionem ab exterioribus ad interiora de luna similitudo adsumeretur, usque ad uicesimam uero et primam propter ipsum numerum septenarium, quo uniuersitatis significatio saepe figuratur, qui etiam ipsi ecclesiae tribuitur propter instar uniuersitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

It changes for the worse, then, when it goes out to outward things and casts away its inmost parts in its life; and this seems better to the earth, that is, to those whose minds are on earthly things, when the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul and he who does wickedly is blessed. But it changes for the better when it gradually turns its attention and glory away from earthly things that appear in this world and turns them to higher and inner things; and this seems worse to the earth, that is, to those whose minds are on earthly things. Hence those ungodly men, doing at last a fruitless repentance, will say among many things: 'These are they whom we once held in derision and as a byword of reproach; we fools thought their life madness.' And so the Holy Spirit, drawing a likeness from visible to invisible things and from bodily to spiritual sacraments, willed that the passage from one life to another, which is called pascha, should be observed from the fourteenth moon: so that the likeness should be taken from the moon not only because of the third time I mentioned above, since the third week begins there, but also because of that very turning from outward to inward things; and up to the twenty-first because of the number seven itself, by which the totality is often figured, and which is also attributed to the church itself as an image of totality.

### Scripture references

- Ps 10:3 (9:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 5:3–4 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 10:3 (9:24 LXX/Vulg.) and Wis 5:3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.9 (CSEL 34.2:179–180; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-9).

## Letter 55.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:180–181
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows from Scripture that the moon signifies the church in its mortal pilgrimage, and Jericho ('moon') falling at the seventh circuit signifies the end of worldly hope.

### Latin text

Ideo Iohannes apostolus in Apocalypsi ad septem scribit ecclesias. ecclesia uero adhuc in ista mortalitate carnis constituta propter ipsam mutabilitatem lunae nomine in scripturis significatur. unde est illud: Parauerunt sagittas suas in pharetra, ut sagittent in obscura luna rectos corde. prius enim quam fiat illud, quod dicit apostolus: Cum Christus apparuerit uita uestra, tunc et uos cum illo apparebitis in gloria, obscura uidetur ecclesia in tempore peregrinationis suae inter multas iniquitates gemens et tunc sunt timendae insidiae fallacium seductorum, quas nomine sagittarum intellegi uoluit. unde alio loco propter nuntios fidelissimos ueritatis, quos ubique parit ecclesia, dicitur: Luna testis in caelo fidelis, et cum de regno domini psalmus caneret: Orietur, inquit, in diebus eius iustitia et abundantia pacis, quoad usque interficiatur luna, id est abundantia pacis in tantum crescet, donec omnem mutabilitatem mortalitatis absumat. tunc nouissima inimica destruetur mors et, quicquid nobis resistit ex infirmitate carnis, unde nobis perfecta pax nondum est, consumetur omnino, cum corruptibile hoc induet incorruptionem et mortale hoc induet inmortalitatem. unde et illius ciuitatis muri, quae Hiericho appellatur, quod in Hebraeo eloquio luna interpretari dicitur, septimo circumacta testamenti arca corruerunt. quid enim nunc agit adnuntiatio regni caelorum, quam circumactio arcae significauit, nisi ut omnia munimenta mortalis uitae, id est omnis spes huius saeculi, quae resistit spei futuri saeculi, in dono septenario spiritus sancti per liberum arbitrium destruatur? ob hoc enim circumeunte arca non inpulsu uiolento illi muri sed sponte ceciderunt. sunt et alia testimonia scripturarum, quae nobis ingerunt per commemorationem lunae ecclesiae significationem, quae in ista mortalitate ab illa Hierusalem, cuius ciues sancti angeli, in aerumnis et laboribus peregrinatur.

### English translation (Claude)

That is why the apostle John in the Apocalypse writes to seven churches. And the church, still placed in this mortality of the flesh, is signified in the Scriptures by the name of the moon because of that very changeableness. Hence that saying: 'They have made ready their arrows in the quiver, to shoot in the dark moon at the upright in heart.' For before what the apostle says comes to pass, 'When Christ your life appears, then you too will appear with him in glory,' the church seems dark in the time of her pilgrimage, groaning among many iniquities; and then the snares of deceitful seducers are to be feared, which he wished to be understood by the name of arrows. Hence in another place, because of the most faithful messengers of truth whom the church brings forth everywhere, it is said: 'The moon, a faithful witness in heaven.' And when the psalm sang of the Lord's kingdom, it said: 'In his days righteousness shall arise, and abundance of peace, until the moon is taken away'; that is, the abundance of peace will grow until it consumes all the changeableness of mortality. Then the last enemy, death, will be destroyed, and whatever resists us from the weakness of the flesh, by reason of which we do not yet have perfect peace, will be wholly consumed, when this corruptible puts on incorruption and this mortal puts on immortality. Hence the walls of that city called Jericho, which in the Hebrew language is said to mean 'moon', fell when the ark of the covenant was carried round the seventh time. For what does the proclamation of the kingdom of heaven, which the carrying round of the ark signified, do now, except that all the defences of mortal life, that is, all hope of this world which resists the hope of the world to come, should be destroyed by the sevenfold gift of the Holy Spirit through free choice? For this reason, as the ark went round, those walls fell not by violent force but of their own accord. There are other testimonies of the Scriptures too which suggest to us, by mentioning the moon, the meaning of the church, which in this mortality is a pilgrim in hardships and labours away from that Jerusalem whose citizens are the holy angels.

### Scripture references

- Rev 1:11: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 11:2 (10:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 89:37 (88:38 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:7 (71:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:26: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: quotation, high confidence
- Josh 6:20: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 11:2: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 11:2 (10:3 LXX/Vulg.); Col 3:4; Ps 89:37 (88:38 LXX/Vulg.); Ps 72:7 (71:7 LXX/Vulg.), translated as Augustine's Latin has it; allusions to 1 Cor 15:26, 53–54; Josh 6:15–20; Isa 11:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.10 (CSEL 34.2:180–181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-10).

## Letter 55.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:181–182
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine insists that drawing figures from the sun and moon does not mean worshipping them, any more than calling Christ a lamb means worshipping cattle.

### Latin text

Non ideo tamen putare debent stulti, qui nolunt in melius commutari, adoranda esse ista luminaria, quia ducitur ex eis aliquando similitudo ad diuina mysteria figuranda; ex omni enim creatura ducitur. nec ideo in sententiam damnationis debemus inruere, quae ore apostolico de quibusdam profertur, qui coluerunt et seruierunt creaturae potius quam creatori, qui est benedictus in saecula. sicut enim non adoramus pecora, quamuis dictus sit et agnus et uitulus, nec feram, quia dictus sit leo de tribu Iuda, nec lapides, quia petra erat Christus, nec montem Sion, quia in ipso figuratur ecclesia, sic nec solem aut lunam, quamuis ex ea caelesti creatura sicut ex multa terrestri sacramentorum figurae ad informationes mysticas adsumuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet fools who do not wish to be changed for the better should not think on that account that these luminaries are to be worshipped, because a likeness is sometimes drawn from them to figure divine mysteries; for it is drawn from every creature. Nor should we on that account rush into the sentence of condemnation pronounced by the apostle's mouth on certain people who worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. For just as we do not worship cattle, although he has been called both lamb and calf, nor a wild beast, because he has been called the lion of the tribe of Judah, nor stones, because the rock was Christ, nor Mount Zion, because the church is figured in it, so neither do we worship the sun or the moon, although from that heavenly creation, as from much of the earthly, figures of the sacraments are taken for mystical instruction.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:25: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:29: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 5:5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Rom 1:25; John 1:29; Rev 5:5; 1 Cor 10:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.11 (CSEL 34.2:181–182; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-11).

## Letter 55.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:182–183
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Manichaean taunt about the Easter reckoning: using natural things as figures is not superstition.

### Latin text

Quapropter Manichaeorum deliramenta cum detestatione ridenda sunt, quibus cum obiecerimus uana commenta, unde homines in errorem praecipitant, quo prius praecipitati sunt, garruli sibi uidentur, cum dicunt nobis: Cur et uos ad solis et lunae computationem pascha celebratis? quasi nos ordines siderum aut uicissitudines temporum a summo atque optimo deo conditas arguamus et non eorum peruersitatem, quae rebus sapientissime conditis ad stultitiae suae uanissimas opiniones abutitur. nam si mathematicus nobis contradicturus est de sideribus et luminaribus caeli ad sacramenta mystice figuranda similitudines ducere, contradicant et augures, ne dicatur nobis: Estote simplices sicut columbae; contradicant et Marsi, ne dicatur nobis: Astuti ut serpentes; contradicant histriones, ne in psalmis citharam nominemus; aut quia ex his rebus ad mysteria uerbi dei similitudinum signa sumuntur, dicant, si placet, uel auspicia nos captare uel uenena conficere uel theatricas affectare luxurias, quod dementissimum est dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore the ravings of the Manichees are to be laughed at with detestation. When we charge them with the empty fictions by which they hurl men headlong into the error into which they were first hurled themselves, they think themselves clever when they say to us: 'Why do you too celebrate Easter by the reckoning of the sun and the moon?' As if we found fault with the orders of the stars or the changes of the seasons, created by the supreme and good God, and not with their perversity, which abuses things most wisely created for the emptiest opinions of their folly. For if an astrologer is going to object to our drawing likenesses from the stars and lights of heaven to figure the sacraments mystically, let the augurs object too, so that it may not be said to us, 'Be simple as doves'; let the Marsi object too, so that it may not be said to us, 'Wise as serpents'; let the actors object, so that we may not name the harp in the psalms. Or else, because signs of likenesses are taken from these things for the mysteries of the word of God, let them say, if they please, that we are seeking auspices, or brewing poisons, or affecting theatrical luxuries, which is the height of madness to say.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Matt 10:16. The Marsi were reputed snake-charmers.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.12 (CSEL 34.2:182–183; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-12).

## Letter 55.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:183–185
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes astrology, which he condemns, from observing natural seasons and from using creation as figures of sacred truths.

### Latin text

Non igitur nos de sole et luna annuis menstruisue temporibus actionum nostrarum euenta conicimus, ne in uitae humanae periculosissimis tempestatibus tamquam in scopulos miserae seruitutis inlisi a libero arbitrio naufragemus, sed ad rem sacrate significandam similitudines habitas religiosissima deuotione suscipimus sicut de cetera creatura de uentis, de mari, de terra, de uolatilibus, de piscibus, de pecoribus, de arboribus, de hominibus ad sermonem quidem multipliciter, ad celebrationem uero sacramentorum iam Christiana libertate parcissime sicut de aqua, de frumento, de uino, de oleo. in seruitute autem ueteris populi multa etiam celebrari imperata sunt, quae nobis tantum modo intellegenda traduntur. non itaque dies obseruamus et annos et menses et tempora, ne audiamus ab apostolo: Timeo uos, ne forte sine causa laborauerim in uobis; eos enim culpat, qui dicunt: Non proficiscar, quia posterus est aut quia luna sic fertur, uel: Proficiscar, ut prospera cedant, quia ita se habet positio siderum; non agam hoc mense commercium, quia illa stella mihi agit mensem, uel: Agam, quia suscipit mensem: non plantem hoc anno uineam, quia bissextus est. non autem quisquam sapiens arbitratur obseruatores temporum reprehendendos, qui dicunt: Non proficiscar hodie, quia tempestas exorta est, aut: Non nauigem, quia adhuc sunt hibernae reliquiae, aut: Tempus seminandi est, quod imbribus autumnalibus terra satiata est, uel si qui forte alii naturales effectus circa motus aeris et humoris ad uariandas temporum qualitates in siderum ordinatissima conuersione notati sunt, de quibus dictum est, dum conderentur: Et sint in signis et temporibus et in diebus et in annis. si quae autem figurae similitudinum non tantum de caelo et sideribus sed etiam de creatura inferiore ducuntur ad dispensationem sacramentorum, eloquentia quaedam est doctrinae salutaris monendo affectui discentium accommodata a uisibilibus ad inuisibilia, a corporalibus ad spiritalia, a temporalibus ad aeterna.

### English translation (Claude)

We do not, then, infer from the sun and the moon, at yearly or monthly times, the outcomes of our actions, lest in the most dangerous storms of human life we should be dashed as on the rocks of a wretched slavery and make shipwreck of free choice. But we receive with most religious devotion likenesses taken from them for signifying a sacred thing, as from the rest of creation: from winds, sea, earth, birds, fish, cattle, trees, men; in speech, indeed, in many ways, but in the celebration of the sacraments, with Christian freedom, very sparingly, as from water, grain, wine, and oil. But in the servitude of the old people many things were commanded even to be celebrated which are handed down to us only to be understood. So we do not observe days and years and months and seasons, lest we hear from the apostle: 'I fear for you, lest perhaps I have laboured among you in vain.' For he blames those who say: 'I will not set out, because it is an unlucky day,' or 'because the moon is in such a position'; or 'I will set out, so that things may go well, because the position of the stars is such'; 'I will not do business this month, because that star governs my month,' or 'I will, because it takes up the month'; 'I will not plant a vineyard this year, because it is leap year.' But no wise man thinks that those observers of times are to be blamed who say, 'I will not set out today, because a storm has arisen,' or 'I will not sail, because the remains of winter are still here,' or 'It is time to sow, because the earth has been soaked by the autumn rains'; or any other natural effects that have been observed concerning the motions of air and moisture in varying the qualities of the seasons in the most orderly revolution of the stars, of which it was said when they were created: 'And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years.' But if figures of likenesses are drawn not only from heaven and the stars but also from lower creation for the dispensation of the sacraments, it is a kind of eloquence of saving doctrine, adapted to moving the affection of learners from visible to invisible things, from bodily to spiritual, from temporal to eternal.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:10: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:11: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gal 4:10–11 and Gen 1:14. 'Unlucky day' renders posterus (dies), the day after the Kalends, Nones or Ides, considered ill-omened.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.13 (CSEL 34.2:183–185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-13).

## Letter 55.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:185–186
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the sun's position in Aries at Easter is not why Christians keep the feast then, though Scripture is free to draw figures from the stars.

### Latin text

Nec quisquam nostrum adtendit, quod eo tempore, quo pascha celebramus, sol in ariete est, sicut illi appellant quendam siderum locum, ubi re uera mense nouorum sol inuenitur; sed siue illi arietem siue aliud aliquid eandem partem caeli uocare uoluerint, nos de scripturis sanctis hoc didicimus, quod omnia sidera deus condidit et locis caelestibus, quibus uoluit, ordinauit. quae stellis distincta et ordinata in quaslibet partes diuidant, quibuslibet uocabulis notent, ubicumque sol esset mense nouorum, illic eum reperiret haec celebratio propter similitudinem sacramenti renouandae uitae, de qua satis disseruimus. quod si etiam locus ille siderum aries posset uocari propter aliquam figuram et congruentiam, neque hinc timeret sermo diuinus aliquam sacramenti similitudinem ducere, sicut de aliis non solum caelestibus sed etiam terrestribus creaturis sicut de Orione uel Pliadibus, sicut de monte Sina, de monte Sion, sicut de fluminibus, qui uocantur Geon, Phison, Tigris, Euphrates, sicut de ipso totiens in sanctis mysteriis nobilitato fluuio Iordane rerum figurate insinuandarum mysticas similitudines duxit.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor does any of us pay attention to the fact that at the time when we celebrate Easter the sun is in the Ram, as they call a certain region of the stars, where indeed the sun is found in the month of new things. But whether they choose to call that same part of the sky the Ram or something else, we have learned from the holy Scriptures that God created all the stars and set them in order in the heavenly places he wished. However they divide the stars, marked out and ordered, into whatever parts, and by whatever names they designate them, wherever the sun was in the month of new things, there this celebration would find it, because of the likeness to the sacrament of renewing life, about which we have said enough. And if that region of the stars could be called the Ram because of some figure and correspondence, the divine word would not be afraid to draw some likeness of a sacrament from it, just as it has drawn mystical likenesses for conveying things figuratively from other creatures, not only heavenly but also earthly: as from Orion or the Pleiades, from Mount Sinai, from Mount Zion, from the rivers called Gihon, Pishon, Tigris, Euphrates, from the river Jordan itself, so often made famous in the holy mysteries.

### Scripture references

- Job 9:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Job 38:31: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Job 9:9 and 38:31 (Orion, Pleiades) and Gen 2:11–14 (the rivers).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.14 (CSEL 34.2:185–186; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-14).

## Letter 55.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:186
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes legitimate uses of the stars in farming, navigation, and teaching from astrology's search for fated outcomes.

### Latin text

Sed quantum intersit inter obseruationes siderum ad aerias qualitates accommodatas, sicut agricolae uel nautae obseruant, aut ad notandas partes mundi cursumque aliquo et alicunde dirigendum, quod gubernatores nauium faciunt et hi, qui per solitudines arenosas in interiora austri nulla certa semita gradiuntur, aut ad aliquid in doctrina utili figurate significandum si fit nonnullorum siderum aliqua commemoratio —, quantum ergo intersit inter has utilitates et uanitates hominum ad hoc obseruantium sidera, ut nec aeris qualitates nec regionum uias nec solos temporum numeros nec spiritalium similitudines sed quasi fatalia rerum euenta perquirant, quis non intellegat?

### English translation (Claude)

But who does not understand how great a difference there is between observations of the stars adapted to the qualities of the weather, as farmers or sailors observe them, or to marking the regions of the world and directing one's course to or from somewhere, as ship's pilots do and those who travel through sandy deserts into the interior of the south by no fixed path, or for signifying something figuratively in useful teaching, if some mention of certain stars is made; how great a difference, I say, between these useful purposes and the vanities of men who observe the stars in order to search out neither the qualities of the weather, nor the routes of regions, nor merely the numbers of the seasons, nor likenesses of spiritual things, but as it were the fated outcomes of events?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.15 (CSEL 34.2:186; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-15).

## Letter 55.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:186–187
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christians, unlike Jews, require a sabbath within the Easter celebration, because a sabbath lay between Christ's death and resurrection.

### Latin text

Sed iam deinceps uideamus, cur etiam id obseruatur, cum pascha celebramus, ut sabbatum occurrat; hoc enim proprium Christianae religionis est, nam Iudaei tantum modo mensem nouorum et lunam obseruant a quarta decima usque uicesimam primam. sed quia illud eorum pascha, quo passus est dominus, ita occurrit, ut inter mortem eius et resurrectionem medius esset sabbati dies, addendum patres nostri censuerunt, ut et nostra festiuitas a Iudaeorum festiuitate distingueretur et, quod non frustra factum esse credendum est ab illo, qui est ante tempora et per quem facta sunt tempora et qui uenit in plenitudine temporum et qui potestatem habebat ponendi animam suam et iterum recipiendi eam et ideo non fatalem sed opportunam sacramento, quod commendare instituerat, horam expectabat, cum diceret: Nondum uenit hora mea, ut in anniuersaria passionis eius celebratione a posteris seruaretur.

### English translation (Claude)

But now let us see next why, when we celebrate Easter, care is also taken that the sabbath should fall within it; for this is peculiar to the Christian religion, since the Jews observe only the month of new things and the moon from the fourteenth to the twenty-first. But because their Passover, at which the Lord suffered, fell in such a way that the sabbath day was between his death and his resurrection, our fathers judged that this should be added, both so that our festival might be distinguished from the festival of the Jews, and so that what we must believe was not done without purpose by him who is before times, through whom times were made, who came in the fullness of time, and who had power to lay down his life and take it up again, and who therefore waited for an hour not fated but suited to the sacrament he had resolved to commend, saying, 'My hour has not yet come', might be kept by later generations in the yearly celebration of his passion.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:18: allusion, high confidence
- John 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Gal 4:4; John 10:18; John 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.16 (CSEL 34.2:186–187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-16).

## Letter 55.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:187–188
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains the sabbath as a figure of eternal rest, which is active and untroubled, and the Lord's day, the eighth and first, as the restored, eternal life.

### Latin text

Quod enim nunc, ut superius dixi, fide ac spe peregrinamur atque, ut ad id perueniamus, dilectione satagimus, requies est quaedam ab omni labore omnium molestiarum sancta atque perpetua. in eam nobis ex hac uita fit transitus, quem dominus noster Iesus Christus sua passione praemonstrare et consecrare dignatus est. inest autem in illa requie non desidiosa segnitia sed quaedam ineffabilis tranquillitas actionis otiosae. sic enim ab huius uitae operibus in fine requiescitur, ut in alterius uitae actione gaudeatur. sed quia talis actio in dei laude agitur sine labore membrorum, sine angore curarum, non ad eam sic transitur per quietem, ut ipsi labor succedat, id est non sic esse incipiat actio, ut desinat quies, neque enim reditur ad labores et curas, sed permanet in actione, quod ad quietem pertinet, nec in opere laborare nec in cogitatione fluctuare. quia ergo per requiem ad primam uitam reditur, unde anima lapsa est in peccatum, propterea sabbato requies significatur. illa autem prima uita, quae a peregrinatione redeuntibus et primam stolam accipientibus redditur, per unam sabbati, quem diem dominicum dicimus, figuratur. quaere septem dies, Genesim lege: inuenies septimum sine uespere, quia requiem sine fine significat. prima ergo uita non fuit sempiterna peccanti, requies autem ultima sempiterna est ac per hoc et octauus sempiternam beatitudinem habebit, quia requies illa, quae sempiterna est, excipitur ab octauo, non extinguitur; neque enim esset aliter sempiterna. ita ergo erit octauus, qui primus, ut prima uita sed aeterna reddatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For the goal towards which, as I said above, we now journey by faith and hope, and to reach which we strive through love, is a certain rest from all labour of all troubles, holy and everlasting. Into it a passage is made for us out of this life, which our Lord Jesus Christ deigned to show beforehand and consecrate by his passion. In that rest there is no slothful idleness, but a certain ineffable tranquillity of leisured activity. For at the end one rests from the works of this life in such a way as to rejoice in the activity of the other life. But since such activity is carried on in the praise of God without labour of the limbs and without the anguish of cares, one does not pass to it through rest in such a way that labour succeeds rest, that is, activity does not begin in such a way that rest ceases; for there is no return to labours and cares, but what belongs to rest remains in the activity: neither toiling in work nor wavering in thought. Since, then, through rest there is a return to the first life, from which the soul fell into sin, rest is therefore signified by the sabbath. But that first life, which is restored to those returning from pilgrimage and receiving the first robe, is figured by the first day of the week, which we call the Lord's day. Look for the seven days; read Genesis: you will find the seventh without an evening, because it signifies rest without end. So the first life was not everlasting for the sinner, but the final rest is everlasting; and therefore the eighth day too will have everlasting blessedness, because that rest which is everlasting is taken up by the eighth, not extinguished; for otherwise it would not be everlasting. So the eighth will be the same as the first, so that the first life may be restored, but eternal.

### Scripture references

- Luke 15:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Luke 15:22 (the first robe) and Gen 2:2–3 (the seventh day has no evening).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.17 (CSEL 34.2:187–188; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-17).

## Letter 55.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:188–190
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the sabbath figures rest in the Holy Spirit, and that souls, like weights, strive for the rest found only in delighting in God.

### Latin text

Sabbatum tamen commendatum est priori populo in otio corporaliter celebrando, ut figura esset sanctificationis in requiem spiritus sancti. numquam enim legimus in Genesi sanctificationem per omnes priores dies, sed de solo sabbato dictum est: Et sanctificauit deus diem septimum. amant enim requiem siue piae animae siue iniquae; sed qua perueniant ad id, quod amant, plurimum nesciunt; nec aliquid appetunt etiam ipsa corpora ponderibus suis, nisi quod animae amoribus suis. nam sicut corpus tam diu nititur pondere siue deorsum uersus siue sursum uersus, donec ad locum, quo nititur, ueniens conquiescat — pondus quippe olei si dimittatur in aere, deorsum, si autem sub aquis, sursum nititur —. sic animae ad ea, quae amant, propterea nituntur, ut perueniendo requiescant. et multa quidem per corpus delectant, sed non est in eis aeterna requies nec saltem diuturna; et propterea magis sordidant animam et grauant potius, ut sincerum eius pondus, quo in superna fertur, impediant. cum uero anima se ipsa delectatur, nondum re incommutabili delectatur et ideo adhuc superba est, quia se pro summo habet, cum superior sit deus. nec in tali peccato inpunita relinquitur, quia deus superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam. cum autem deo delectatur, ibi ueram, certam, aeternam inuenit requiem, quam in aliis quaerebat nec inueniebat. proinde admonetur in psalmo: Delectare in domino et dabit tibi petitiones cordis tui.

### English translation (Claude)

The sabbath, however, was commended to the former people to be celebrated bodily by rest from work, so that it might be a figure of sanctification in the rest of the Holy Spirit. For we never read in Genesis of sanctification through all the earlier days, but of the sabbath alone it was said: 'And God sanctified the seventh day.' For souls love rest, whether godly or wicked; but most of them do not know how to reach what they love. Even bodies by their weights seek nothing but what souls seek by their loves. For just as a body strives by its weight, whether downward or upward, until, coming to the place towards which it strives, it comes to rest (for the weight of oil, if released in air, strives downward, but if under water, upward), so souls strive towards the things they love, in order to rest by reaching them. And many things delight through the body, but in them there is no eternal rest, nor even a lasting one; and therefore they rather defile and weigh down the soul, so as to hinder its pure weight, by which it is borne to things above. But when the soul delights in itself, it does not yet delight in an unchangeable thing, and so it is still proud, because it holds itself to be supreme, whereas God is higher. Nor is it left unpunished in such a sin, because God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble. But when it delights in God, there it finds true, sure, eternal rest, which it was seeking in other things and not finding. Hence it is admonished in the psalm: 'Delight in the Lord, and he will give you the desires of your heart.'

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 5:5: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 37:4 (36:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gen 2:3; Jas 4:6 (1 Pet 5:5); Ps 37:4 (36:4 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.18 (CSEL 34.2:188–190; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-18).

## Letter 55.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:190
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that God's rest on the seventh day signifies the rest he will give us, as our good works are his work in us.

### Latin text

Quia ergo caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, ideo sanctificatio in septimo die commemorata est, ubi requies commendatur. quia uero nec bene operari possumus nisi dono eius adiuti, sicut apostolus dicit: Deus enim est, qui operatur in uobis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate, nec requiescere poterimus post omnia bona opera nostra, quae in hac uita gerimus, nisi eius dono ad aeternitatem sanctificati atque perfecti, propterea de ipso deo dicitur, quia, cum fecisset omnia opera bona ualde septimo die requieuit ab omnibus operibus suis, quae fecit. futuram enim requiem significabat, quam post bona opera daturus erat hominibus. sicut enim, cum bene operamur, ipse dicitur operari in nobis, cuius munere bene operamur, ita, cum requiescimus, ipse requiescere dicitur, quo donante requiescimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us, sanctification is mentioned on the seventh day, where rest is commended. But since we cannot work well unless helped by his gift, as the apostle says, 'For it is God who works in you both to will and to work for his good pleasure', nor shall we be able to rest after all the good works we do in this life unless sanctified and perfected for eternity by his gift, therefore it is said of God himself that, when he had made all things very good, he rested on the seventh day from all his works which he had made. For it signified the future rest which he was to give to men after good works. For just as, when we work well, he is said to work in us, by whose gift we work well, so, when we rest, he is said to rest, by whose gift we rest.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:31: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Rom 5:5 and Phil 2:13; allusions to Gen 1:31 and Gen 2:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.19 (CSEL 34.2:190; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-19).

## Letter 55.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:190–191
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine relates the first three commandments to the Trinity: images to the Father, God's name to the Son, and the sabbath to the Holy Spirit and future rest.

### Latin text

Hinc est, quod etiam in tribus primis praeceptis decalogi, quae ad deum pertinent — cetera enim septem ad proximum pertinent, id est ad hominem, quia in duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet —, tertium ibi de obseruatione sabbati positum est, ut in primo praecepto patrem intellegamus, ubi prohibetur coli aliqua in figmentis hominum dei similitudo, non quia non habet imaginem deus, sed quia nulla imago eius coli debet nisi illa, quae et hoc est, quod ipse, nec ipsa pro illo sed cum illo; et quia creatura mutabilis est ac propterea dicitur: Omnis creatura uanitati subiecta est, quoniam natura uniuersi etiam in parte monstratur, ne quisquam filium dei uerbum, per quod facta sunt omnia, iam putaret esse creaturam, sequitur aliud praeceptum: Non accipias in uanum nomen domini dei tui; spiritus autem sanctus, in quo nobis requies illa tribuitur, quam ubique amamus, sed nisi deum amando non inuenimus, cum caritas eius diffunditur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, quia sanctificauit deus diem septimum, in quo requieuit, tertio praecepto legis insinuatur, quod scriptum est de obseruatione sabbati, non ut iam in ista uita nos quiescere existimemus, sed ut omnia, quae bene operamur, non habeant intentionem nisi in futuram requiem sempiternam. memento enim maxime, quod iam supra commemoraui, quia spe salui facti sumus; spes autem quae uidetur, non est spes.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence it is that among the first three commandments of the Decalogue, which concern God (for the other seven concern the neighbour, that is, man, since the whole law hangs on two commandments), the third concerns the observance of the sabbath. So in the first commandment we understand the Father, where the worship of any likeness of God in human fabrications is forbidden; not because God has no image, but because no image of him ought to be worshipped except that which is what he himself is, and not even that in his place, but with him. And because the creature is changeable, and therefore it is said, 'Every creature has been subjected to vanity', since the nature of the whole is shown even in a part, another commandment follows, lest anyone should think the Son of God, the Word through whom all things were made, to be a creature: 'You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.' And the Holy Spirit, in whom that rest is granted to us which we love everywhere but find only by loving God, when his love is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (since God sanctified the seventh day, on which he rested), is suggested in the third commandment of the law, which is written about the observance of the sabbath; not so that we should think we rest already in this life, but so that all the good we do may have no aim but the future everlasting rest. For remember above all what I have already mentioned above, that in hope we have been saved; but hope that is seen is not hope.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:20: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 22:40; Exod 20:4; Rom 8:20; John 1:3; Exod 20:7; Rom 5:5; Gen 2:3; Rom 8:24. The 'image ... which is what he himself is' is the Son. The Trinitarian reading of the Decalogue is Augustine's.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.20 (CSEL 34.2:190–191; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-20).

## Letter 55.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:191–192
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that figurative expressions kindle love more than plain statements, because the mind is quickened by passing from images to spiritual realities.

### Latin text

Ad ipsum autem ignem amoris nutriendum et flatandum quodam modo, quo tamquam pondere sursum uel introrsum referamur ad requiem, omnia ista pertinent, quae figurate nobis insinuantur; plus enim mouent et accendunt amorem, quam si nuda sine ullis sacramentorum similitudinibus ponerentur. cuius rei causam difficile est dicere: sed tamen ita se habet, ut aliquid per allegoricam significationem intimatum plus moueat, plus delectet et plus honoretur, quam si uerbis propriis apertissime diceretur. credo, quod ipse animae motus, quam diu rebus adhuc terrenis implicatur, pigrius inflammatur; si feratur ad similitudines corporales et inde referatur ad spiritalia, quae illis similitudinibus figurantur, ipso quasi transitu uegetatur et tamquam in facula ignis agitatus accenditur et ardentiore dilectione rapitur ad quietem.

### English translation (Claude)

All those things which are conveyed to us figuratively serve to nourish and, as it were, fan the very fire of love by which, as by a weight, we are carried upward or inward to rest; for they move and kindle love more than if they were set out bare, without any likenesses of sacraments. The reason for this is hard to state; yet it is so, that something intimated through allegorical meaning moves more, delights more, and is more honoured than if it were said most plainly in literal words. I believe that the soul's movement, as long as it is still entangled in earthly things, is kindled rather sluggishly; but if it is carried to bodily likenesses and from there brought back to the spiritual things figured by those likenesses, it is quickened by the very passage, and is kindled like a flame stirred in a torch, and is carried away to rest with more ardent love.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.21 (CSEL 34.2:191–192; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-21).

## Letter 55.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:192–194
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that of the Ten Commandments only the sabbath is to be kept figuratively, as spiritual rest, while the others are kept literally.

### Latin text

Ideoque inter omnia decem illa praecepta solum ibi, quod de sabbato positum est, figurate obseruandum praecipitur. quam figuram nos intellegendam, non etiam per otium corporale celebrandam suscepimus. cum enim sabbato significetur spiritalis requies, de qua dictum est in psalmo: Vacate et uidete, quoniam ego sum dominus, et quo uocantur homines ab ipso domino dicente: Venite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam; tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quia mitis sum et humilis corde, et inuenietis requiem animabus uestris, cetera tamen ibi praecepta proprie, sicut praecepta sunt, sine ulla figurata significatione obseruamus. nam et idola non colere manifeste didicimus et non accipere in uanum nomen domini dei nostri et honorare patrem et matrem et non moechari, non occidere, non furari, non falsum testimonium dicere, non concupiscere uxorem proximi, non concupiscere ullam rem proximi non figurate aliud praetendunt et mystice aliud significant, sed sic obseruantur, ut sonant. obseruare tamen diem sabbati non iubemur ad litteram secundum otium ab opere corporali, sicut obseruant Iudaei; et ipsa eorum obseruatio quia ita praecepta est, nisi aliam quandam spiritalem requiem significet, ridenda iudicatur. unde non inconuenienter intellegimus ad amorem excitandum, quo ad requiem tendimus, ualere omnia, quae figurate in scripturis dicuntur, quando quidem id solum in decalogo figurate praecipitur, ubi requies commendatur, quae ubique amatur, sed in solo deo sancta et certa inuenitur.

### English translation (Claude)

And so, among all those ten commandments, only the one about the sabbath is commanded to be observed figuratively; and we have taken up that figure to be understood, not also to be celebrated by bodily rest. For since the sabbath signifies spiritual rest, of which it is said in the psalm, 'Be still and see that I am the Lord', and to which men are called by the Lord himself, saying, 'Come to me, all who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you; take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls', we nevertheless observe the other commandments there literally, as commandments, without any figurative meaning. For we have plainly learned not to worship idols, not to take the name of the Lord our God in vain, to honour father and mother, not to commit adultery, not to kill, not to steal, not to bear false witness, not to covet our neighbour's wife, not to covet anything of our neighbour's; these do not figuratively put forward one thing and mystically signify another, but are observed as they sound. But we are not commanded to observe the sabbath day according to the letter, by rest from bodily work, as the Jews observe it; and their observance itself, because it is so commanded, is judged ridiculous unless it signifies some other, spiritual rest. Hence we understand, not unfittingly, that all the things said figuratively in the Scriptures serve to arouse the love by which we tend towards rest, since only that commandment in the Decalogue is given figuratively in which rest is commended, which is loved everywhere but is found holy and sure in God alone.

### Scripture references

- Ps 46:10 (45:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:8: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Ps 46:10 (45:11 LXX/Vulg.) and Matt 11:28–29; allusion to Exod 20:3–17. Augustine's remark on Jewish observance is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.22 (CSEL 34.2:192–194; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-22).

## Letter 55.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:194–195
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the Lord's day, the eighth and first, was revealed by Christ's resurrection and signifies the glorified activity of the risen body.

### Latin text

Dies tamen dominicus non Iudaeis sed Christianis resurrectione domini declaratus est et ex illo habere coepit festiuitatem suam. animae quippe omnium sanctorum ante resurrectionem corporis sunt quidem in requie, sed in ea non sunt actione, qua corpora recepta uegetantur. talem quippe actionem significat dies octauus, qui et primus, quia non aufert illam requiem, sed glorificat. non enim redit cum corpore difficultas ex corpore, quia nec corruptio: Oportet enim corruptibile hoc indui incorruptionem et mortale hoc indui inmortalitatem. quapropter ante domini resurrectionem quamuis sanctos patres plenos prophetico spiritu octaui sacramentum nequaquam lateret, quo significaretur resurrectio — nam et pro octauo psalmus scribitur et octaua die circumcidebantur infantes et in Ecclesiaste ad duorum testamentorum significationem dicitur: Illis septem et illis octo —, reseruatum est tamen et occultatum et solum celebrandum sabbatum traditum est, quia erat antea requies mortuorum, resurrectio autem nullius erat, qui resurgens a mortuis non moreretur et mors ei ultra non dominaretur, ut, postquam facta est talis resurrectio in corpore domini, ut praeiret in capite ecclesiae, quod corpus ecclesiae speraret in finem, iam dies dominicus, id est octauus, qui et primus, inciperet celebrari. ipsa etiam causa intellegitur, cur obseruandum pascha, ubi ouem occidere et edere iubentur, cum manifestissime passionem domini praefigurat, non eis ita praeceptum est, ut adtenderent occurrere sabbatum et cum mense nouorum ad tertiam lunae hebdomadem concurrere, ut eundem quoque diem dominus potius sua passione signaret, qui etiam dominicum, id est octauum, qui et primus est, declaraturus aduenerat.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord's day, however, was made known not to the Jews but to Christians by the resurrection of the Lord, and from that it began to have its festival. For the souls of all the saints, before the resurrection of the body, are indeed at rest, but they are not in that activity by which bodies, once recovered, are quickened. Such activity is signified by the eighth day, which is also the first, because it does not take away that rest but glorifies it. For the difficulty arising from the body does not return with the body, since neither does corruption: 'For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality.' Therefore, before the Lord's resurrection, although the sacrament of the eighth day, by which the resurrection was signified, was by no means hidden from the holy fathers, full of the prophetic spirit (for a psalm is written 'for the eighth', infants were circumcised on the eighth day, and in Ecclesiastes it is said, signifying the two testaments, 'To those seven and to those eight'), it was nevertheless reserved and hidden, and only the sabbath was handed down to be celebrated; because previously there was the rest of the dead, but no one's resurrection who, rising from the dead, would not die, and over whom death would have no more dominion. So, after such a resurrection had taken place in the Lord's body, so that what the body of the church hoped for at the end might go before in the head of the church, the Lord's day, that is, the eighth, which is also the first, might begin to be celebrated. The same reason is understood why, in the observance of the Passover, in which they were commanded to kill and eat a lamb, though it most plainly prefigured the Lord's passion, they were not commanded to see that the sabbath should fall within it and coincide with the third week of the moon in the month of new things: so that the Lord might rather mark that same day by his passion, who had come also to make known the Lord's day, that is, the eighth, which is also the first.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:53: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 6:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 17:12: allusion, high confidence
- Eccl 11:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:9: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 12:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of 1 Cor 15:53; allusions to Ps 6 and 12 titles ('for the eighth'), Gen 17:12, Rom 6:9, Exod 12. 'To those seven and to those eight' is Eccl 11:2 in Augustine's Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.23 (CSEL 34.2:194–195; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-3/#p-55-23).

## Letter 55.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:195–196
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the three days of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection: the cross is the present life of mortifying sin, the burial and resurrection are held in faith and hope.

### Latin text

Adtende igitur sacratissimum triduum crucifixi, sepulti, suscitati. horum trium quod significat crux, in praesenti agimus uita; quod autem significat sepultura et resurrectio, fide ac spe gerimus. nunc enim dicitur homini: Tolle crucem tuam et sequere me. cruciatur autem caro, cum mortificantur membra nostra super terram, fornicatio, inmunditia, luxuria, auaritia et cetera huius modi, de quibus dicit: Si enim secundum carnem uixeritis, moriemini; si autem spiritu facta carnis mortificaueritis, uiuetis. hinc etiam de ipso dicit: Mundus mihi crucifixus est et ego mundo, et alio loco: Scientes, inquit, quia uetus homo noster simul crucifixus est cruci cum illo, ut euacuetur corpus peccati, ut ultra non seruiamus peccato. quam diu ergo id agunt opera nostra, ut euacuetur corpus peccati, quam diu exterior homo corrumpitur, ut interior renouetur de die in diem, tempus est crucis.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider, then, the most sacred three days of the one crucified, buried, and raised. Of these three, what the cross signifies we do in the present life; what the burial and resurrection signify we carry out in faith and hope. For now it is said to man: 'Take up your cross and follow me.' And the flesh is crucified when our members on earth are put to death: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, greed, and the rest of this kind, of which he says: 'For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live.' Hence he also says of himself: 'The world has been crucified to me, and I to the world'; and in another place: 'Knowing that our old man was crucified together with him, so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we might no longer serve sin.' As long, then, as our works aim at this, that the body of sin may be done away with, as long as the outer man decays so that the inner may be renewed day by day, it is the time of the cross.

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:24: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations or allusions: Matt 16:24; Col 3:5; Rom 8:13; Gal 6:14; Rom 6:6; 2 Cor 4:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.24 (CSEL 34.2:195–196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-24).

## Letter 55.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:196–198
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the breadth, height, length, and depth of the cross as cheerfulness in good works, hope of reward, patience, and the hidden sacrament, and the burial and resurrection as held in faith.

### Latin text

Haec sunt etiam bona opera quidem tamen adhuc laboriosa, quorum merces requies est. sed ideo dicitur: Spe gaudentes, ut cogitantes requiem futuram cum hilaritate in laboribus operemur. hanc hilaritatem significat crucis latitudo in transuerso ligno, ubi figuntur manus; per manus enim opera intellegimus, per latitudinem hilaritatem operantis, quia tristitia facit angustias; per altitudinem autem, cui caput adiungitur, expectationem retributionis de sublimi iustitia dei, qui reddet unicuique secundum opera sua, his quidem qui secundum tolerantiam boni operis gloriam et honorem et incorruptionem quaerentibus uitam aeternam. itaque etiam longitudo, qua totum corpus extenditur, ipsam tolerantiam significat, unde longanimes dicuntur, qui tolerant. profundum autem, quod terrae infixum est, secretum sacramenti praefigurat. recordaris enim, nisi fallor, quae uerba apostolica in ista designatione crucis expediam, ubi ait: In caritate radicati atque fundati, ut possitis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis, quae sit longitudo, latitudo, altitudo et profundum. ea quae nondum uidemus et nondum tenemus, sed fide et spe gerimus, in alio biduo figurata sunt. haec enim, quae nunc agimus tamquam clauis praeceptorum in dei timore confixi, sicut scriptum est: Confige clauis a timore tuo carnes meas, in necessariis deputantur, non in eis, quae per se ipsa appetenda et concupiscenda sunt. unde illud optimum se dicit concupiscere, dissolui et esse cum Christo; manere autem in carne necessarium, inquit, propter uos. quod ergo ait dissolui et esse cum Christo, inde incipit requies, quia non interrumpitur resurrectione, sed clarificatur, quae tamen nunc fide retinetur, quia iustus ex fide uiuit. ignoratis, inquit, quoniam, quicumque baptizati sumus in Christo Iesu, in morte illius baptizati sumus? consepulti ergo sumus illi per baptismum in morte. unde nisi fide? neque enim iam in nobis perfectum est adhuc in nobismet ipsis ingemescentibus et adoptionem expectantibus, redemptionem corporis nostri: Spe enim salui facti sumus; spes autem quae uidetur, non est spes; quod enim uidet quis, quid et sperat? si autem, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus.

### English translation (Claude)

These are good works, but still laborious, whose reward is rest. But it is said, 'Rejoicing in hope', so that, thinking of the rest to come, we may work cheerfully in our labours. This cheerfulness is signified by the breadth of the cross in the crossbeam, where the hands are fixed; for by the hands we understand works, by the breadth the cheerfulness of the worker, because sadness makes things narrow. By the height, to which the head is joined, we understand the expectation of reward from the lofty justice of God, who will render to each according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek glory and honour and incorruption, eternal life. And so the length too, along which the whole body is stretched, signifies patience itself, whence those who endure are called long-suffering. The depth, which is fixed in the earth, prefigures the secret of the sacrament. For you remember, unless I am mistaken, what words of the apostle I am explaining in this description of the cross, where he says: 'Rooted and grounded in love, that you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the length, breadth, height, and depth.' The things which we do not yet see and do not yet hold, but carry out in faith and hope, are figured in the other two days. For what we now do, fixed as it were by the nails of the commandments in the fear of God, as it is written, 'Pierce my flesh with nails from fear of you', is counted among things necessary, not among those which are to be sought and desired for their own sake. Hence he says that he desires what is best, to depart and be with Christ; but to remain in the flesh, he says, is necessary for your sake. So in what he says, 'to depart and be with Christ', rest begins, which is not interrupted by the resurrection but glorified; yet it is now held by faith, because the righteous lives by faith. 'Do you not know,' he says, 'that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him through baptism into death.' How, if not by faith? For it is not yet perfected in us, as we still groan within ourselves and wait for the adoption, the redemption of our body: 'For in hope we have been saved; but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:120 (118:120 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations or allusions: Rom 12:12; Rom 2:6–7; Eph 3:17–18; Ps 119:120 (118:120 LXX/Vulg., in Augustine's Latin); Phil 1:23–24; Rom 1:17; Rom 6:3–4; Rom 8:23–25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.25 (CSEL 34.2:196–198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-25).

## Letter 55.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:198–200
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns against expecting full blessedness in this life: the new life is begun in faith and hope and will be completed at the resurrection.

### Latin text

Quod memento quam saepe commemorem. neque iam nunc in ista uita nos beatos fieri debere arbitremur et ab omnibus difficultatibus liberos ac sic in angustiis rerum temporalium aduersus deum ore sacrilego murmuremus, quasi non exhibeat, quod promisit. promisit quidem etiam huic uitae necessaria; sed alia sunt solatia miserorum, alia gaudia beatorum: Domine, inquit, secundum multitudinem dolorum meorum in corde meo exhortationes tuae iucundauerunt animam meam. non ergo murmuremus in difficultatibus, ne perdamus latitudinem hilaritatis, de qua dicitur: Spe gaudentes, quia sequitur: In tribulatione patientes. noua ergo uita in fide nunc inchoatur et spe geritur; nam tunc erit, cum absorbebitur mors in uictoriam, cum illa nouissima inimica destruetur mors, cum inmutati fuerimus et aequales angelis facti: Omnes enim, inquit, resurgemus, sed non omnes inmutabimur, et dominus: Erunt, inquit, aequales angelis dei. adprehensi enim sumus modo in timore per fidem, tunc autem adprehendemus in caritate per speciem. quam diu enim sumus in corpore, peregrinamur a domino; per fidem enim ambulamus, non per speciem. ipse itaque apostolus, qui dicit: Ut adprehendam, sicut et adprehensus sum, aperte se non adprehendisse confitetur: Fratres, inquit, ego me non arbitror adprehendisse. sed tamen quia ipsa spes ex promissione ueritatis certa nobis est, cum diceret: Consepulti ergo sumus illi per baptismum in morte, subiunxit et ait: Ut, quem ad modum surrexit Christus a mortuis per gloriam patris, ita et nos in nouitate uitae ambulemus. ambulamus ergo in re laboris sed in spe quietis, in carne uetustatis sed in fide nouitatis. dicit enim: Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem uita est propter iustitiam. si autem spiritus eius, qui suscitauit Iesum Christum a mortuis, habitat in uobis, qui suscitauit Christum a mortuis, uiuificabit et mortalia corpora uestra per inhabitantem spiritum eius in uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

Remember how often I mention this. Let us not think that we ought already in this life to be made blessed and free from all difficulties, and so, in the straits of temporal things, murmur against God with sacrilegious mouth, as if he did not provide what he promised. He did indeed promise also the necessities of this life; but the comforts of the wretched are one thing, the joys of the blessed another. 'Lord,' it says, 'according to the multitude of my sorrows in my heart, your consolations have gladdened my soul.' Let us not murmur, then, in difficulties, lest we lose the breadth of cheerfulness of which it is said, 'Rejoicing in hope', because there follows: 'Patient in tribulation.' So the new life is now begun in faith and carried on in hope; for it will be then, when death is swallowed up in victory, when that last enemy, death, is destroyed, when we have been changed and made equal to the angels. 'For we shall all rise,' he says, 'but we shall not all be changed'; and the Lord says: 'They will be equal to the angels of God.' For we are now laid hold of in fear through faith, but then we shall lay hold in love through sight. For as long as we are in the body we are away from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight. So the apostle himself, who says, 'That I may lay hold of it, as I have also been laid hold of', openly confesses that he has not laid hold of it: 'Brothers,' he says, 'I do not consider that I have laid hold of it.' Yet because that hope is sure for us, from the promise of the truth, when he said, 'We were buried therefore with him through baptism into death', he added: 'So that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.' So we walk in the reality of labour but in the hope of rest, in the flesh of oldness but in the faith of newness. For he says: 'The body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus Christ from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit dwelling in you.'

### Scripture references

- Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:26: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:51: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 20:36: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:12: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations or allusions: Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX/Vulg.); Rom 12:12; 1 Cor 15:54, 26; 1 Cor 15:51 (in the Latin form 'we shall all rise, but not all be changed'); Luke 20:36; 2 Cor 5:6–7; Phil 3:12–13; Rom 6:4; Rom 8:10–11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.26 (CSEL 34.2:198–200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-26).

## Letter 55.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:200
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Easter's date combines the Old Testament lunar rule with the days of the week of Christ's passion, fixed by councils.

### Latin text

Haec et ex auctoritate diuinarum scripturarum et uniuersae ecclesiae, quae toto orbe diffunditur, consensione per anniuersarium pascha celebrantur in magno utique, sicut iam intellegis, sacramento. et in scripturis quidem ueteribus ad agendum pascha non est praeceptum tempus nisi ei mense nouorum luna quarta decima usque ad uicesimam primam; ex euangelio tamen, quia manifestum est, quo etiam die dominus crucifixus sit et in sepultura fuerit et resurrexerit, adiuncta est etiam ipsorum dierum obseruatio per patrum concilia et orbi uniuerso Christiano persuasum eo modo pascha celebrari oportere.

### English translation (Claude)

These things, then, both by the authority of the divine Scriptures and by the agreement of the universal church, which is spread through the whole world, are celebrated in the yearly Easter, certainly in a great sacrament, as you now understand. In the old Scriptures indeed no time is prescribed for keeping the Passover except in the month of new things, from the fourteenth moon to the twenty-first; but from the gospel, since it is plain on what day the Lord was crucified, lay in the tomb, and rose again, the observance of those very days was added by the councils of the fathers, and the whole Christian world was persuaded that Easter ought to be celebrated in that way.

### Scripture references

- Exod 12:18: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Latin 'nisi ei mense' is probably a digitization slip for 'nisi in (or ut) mense'; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.27 (CSEL 34.2:200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-27).

## Letter 55.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:200–202
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains the scriptural basis and number symbolism of the forty days of Lent and the fifty days of Easter, when fasting is relaxed and prayer is made standing.

### Latin text

Quadragesima sane ieiuniorum habet auctoritatem et in ueteribus libris et ex ieiunio Moysi et Heliae et ex euangelio, quia totidem diebus dominus ieiunauit demonstrans euangelium non dissentire a lege et prophetis. in persona quippe Moysi lex, in persona Heliae prophetae accipiuntur, inter quos in monte gloriosus apparuit, ut euidentius emineret, quod de illo dicit apostolus: Testimonium habens a lege et prophetis. in qua ergo parte anni congruentius obseruatio quadragesimae constitueretur nisi confinis atque contigua dominicae passionis, quia in ea significatur haec uita laboriosa, cui opus est continentia, ut ab ipsius mundi amicitia ieiunetur, quae utique fallaciter blandiri et inlecebrarum fucos circumspargere atque iactare non cessat? numero autem quadragenario uitam istam propterea figurari arbitror, quia denarius, in quo est perfectio beatitudinis nostrae — sicut in octonario, quia redit ad primum, ita in hoc, quia creatura, quae septenario figuratur, adhaeret creatori, in quo declaratur unitas trinitatis —, per uniuersum mundum temporaliter adnuntiatus est, quia mundus et a quattuor uentis deliniatur et quattuor elementis erigitur et a quattuor annuis temporum uicibus uariatur, decem autem quater in quadraginta consummantur, quadragenarius autem partibus suis computatus addit ipsum denarium et fiunt quinquaginta tamquam merces laboris et continentiae. neque enim frustra ipse dominus et quadraginta dies post resurrectionem in hac terra et in hac uita cum discipulis conuersatus est et, posteaquam ascendit in caelum, decem diebus interpositis promissum misit spiritum sanctum completo die pentecostes. qui dies quinquagenarius habet alterum sacramentum, quod septies septeni quadraginta nouem fiunt et, cum reditur ad initium, quod est octauus, qui et primus dies, quinquaginta complentur, qui celebrantur post domini resurrectionem iam in figura non laboris sed quietis et laetitiae. propter hoc ieiunia relaxantur et stantes oramus, quod est signum resurrectionis. unde etiam diebus omnibus dominicis ad altare obseruatur et alleluia canitur. quod significat actionem nostram futuram non esse nisi laudem dei, sicut scriptum est: Beati, qui habitant in domo tua; in saecula saeculorum laudabunt te.

### English translation (Claude)

The forty days of fasting, indeed, have authority both in the old books, from the fasts of Moses and Elijah, and from the gospel, because the Lord fasted for the same number of days, showing that the gospel does not disagree with the law and the prophets. For the law is understood in the person of Moses, the prophets in the person of Elijah, between whom he appeared in glory on the mountain, so that what the apostle says of him might stand out more clearly: 'Having witness from the law and the prophets.' In what part of the year, then, could the observance of the forty days be more fittingly set than next to and adjoining the Lord's passion? For it signifies this laborious life, which needs self-restraint, so that we may fast from friendship with the world itself, which never ceases to flatter deceitfully and to scatter and display the paint of its allurements. And I think this life is figured by the number forty for this reason: the number ten, in which is the perfection of our blessedness (as in the number eight, because it returns to the first, so in this, because the creature, which is figured by seven, cleaves to the Creator, in whom the unity of the Trinity is declared), has been proclaimed in time through the whole world; and the world is marked out by four winds, built up of four elements, and varied by the four yearly changes of the seasons; and ten four times makes forty; and forty, reckoned by its parts, adds ten itself, and makes fifty, as the reward of labour and self-restraint. For it was not without purpose that the Lord himself lived for forty days after the resurrection on this earth and in this life with the disciples, and, after he ascended into heaven, at an interval of ten days, sent the promised Holy Spirit when the day of Pentecost had come. That fiftieth day contains another sacrament: seven times seven makes forty-nine, and when one returns to the beginning, which is the eighth day and also the first, fifty is completed; and these days are celebrated after the Lord's resurrection, now as a figure not of labour but of rest and joy. For this reason fasts are relaxed and we pray standing, which is a sign of the resurrection. Hence on all Lord's days too this is observed at the altar, and Alleluia is sung, which signifies that our future activity will be nothing but the praise of God, as it is written: 'Blessed are those who dwell in your house; for ever and ever they will praise you.'

### Scripture references

- Exod 34:28: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 19:8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 17:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:1: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 84:4 (83:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Exod 34:28; 1 Kgs 19:8; Matt 4:2; Matt 17:3; Acts 1:3; Acts 2:1; quotations of Rom 3:21 and Ps 84:4 (83:5 LXX/Vulg.). 'Number ten ... ten itself': the divisors of 40 (1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 20) add up to 50.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.28 (CSEL 34.2:200–202; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-28).

## Letter 55.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:202–204
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets the fifty days from Passover to the giving of the law beside the fifty days from Easter to Pentecost, the law written by God's finger and the Spirit who is God's finger.

### Latin text

Sed dies quinquaginta et in scripturis commendantur, non tantum in euangelio, quia tunc spiritus sanctus aduenit, sed etiam in ueteribus libris. nam et ipsi, posteaquam pascha occiso agno celebrauerunt, quinquaginta dies numerantur usque in diem, quo lex data est in monte Sina famulo dei Moysi digito dei scripta, in libris autem euangelii apertissime declaratur digitum dei significare spiritum sanctum. cum enim unus euangelista dixisset: In digito dei eicio daemonia, alius hoc idem ita dixit: In spiritu dei eicio daemonia. quis hanc laetitiam diuinorum sacramentorum, cum sanae doctrinae luce clarescunt, non praeferat uniuersis mundi huius imperiis etiam inusitata felicitate pacatis? nonne tamquam duo Seraphin clamant ad inuicem concinentia laudes altissimi: Sanctus, sanctus, sanctus dominus deus sabaoth? ita duo testamenta fideliter concordantia sacratam concinunt ueritatem. occiditur ouis, celebratur pascha et interpositis quinquaginta diebus datur lex ad timorem scripta digito dei: occiditur Christus, qui tamquam ouis ad immolandum ductus est, sicut Esaias propheta testatur, celebratur uerum pascha et interpositis quinquaginta diebus datur ad caritatem spiritus sanctus, qui est digitus dei, contrarius hominibus sua quaerentibus et ideo iugum asperum et sarcinam grauem portantibus nec inuenientibus requiem animabus suis, quia caritas non quaerit, quae sua sunt. ideo animositas haereticorum semper inquieta est, quos magorum Pharaonis habere conatum declarat apostolus dicens: Sicut enim Iamnes et Mambres restiterunt Moysi, sic et hi resistunt ueritati homines mente corrupti, reprobi circa fidem; sed ultra non proficient; dementia enim eorum manifesta erit omnibus, sicut et illorum fuit. quia enim per ipsam corruptionem mentis inquietissimi fuerunt, in signo tertio defecerunt fatentes sibi aduersum esse spiritum sanctum, qui erat in Moyse. nam deficientes dixerunt: Digitus dei est hic. sicut autem conciliatus et placatus spiritus sanctus requiem praestat mitibus et humilibus corde, ita contrarius et aduersus inmites ac superbos inquietudine exagitat. quam inquietudinem muscae illae breuissimae significauerunt, sub quibus magi Pharaonis defecerunt dicentes: Digitus dei est hic.

### English translation (Claude)

But the fifty days are commended in the Scriptures, not only in the gospel, because the Holy Spirit came then, but also in the old books. For after they celebrated the Passover by killing the lamb, fifty days are counted to the day on which the law, written by the finger of God, was given on Mount Sinai to Moses the servant of God; and in the books of the gospel it is most plainly declared that the finger of God signifies the Holy Spirit. For when one evangelist had said, 'By the finger of God I cast out demons', another said the same thing thus: 'By the Spirit of God I cast out demons.' Who would not prefer this joy of the divine sacraments, when they shine with the light of sound doctrine, to all the empires of this world, even when pacified with unheard-of prosperity? Do not the two testaments, like the two Seraphim crying to one another in harmony the praises of the Most High, 'Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts', thus faithfully agree and sing together the sacred truth? The lamb is killed, the Passover is celebrated, and after fifty days the law, written by the finger of God, is given for fear; Christ is killed, who was led like a lamb to the slaughter, as the prophet Isaiah testifies, the true Passover is celebrated, and after fifty days the Holy Spirit, who is the finger of God, is given for love; he is contrary to men who seek their own and therefore bear a harsh yoke and a heavy burden and do not find rest for their souls, because love does not seek its own. Therefore the animosity of heretics is always restless; the apostle declares that they have the attempt of Pharaoh's magicians, saying: 'For as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these also oppose the truth, men corrupted in mind, reprobate concerning the faith; but they will not get much further, for their folly will be plain to all, as theirs was.' For because they were most restless through that very corruption of mind, they failed at the third sign, confessing that the Holy Spirit who was in Moses was against them. For when they failed they said: 'This is the finger of God.' And just as the Holy Spirit, reconciled and appeased, gives rest to the meek and humble of heart, so, contrary and opposed to the ungentle and proud, he harasses them with restlessness. That restlessness was signified by those tiny flies under which Pharaoh's magicians failed, saying: 'This is the finger of God.'

### Scripture references

- Exod 31:18: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 11:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:28: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 53:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:30: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 8:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions or quotations: Exod 31:18; Luke 11:20; Matt 12:28; Isa 6:3; Isa 53:7; Matt 11:29–30; 1 Cor 13:5; 2 Tim 3:8–9 (Augustine's 'Iamnes and Mambres'); Exod 8:19 (8:15 LXX/Vulg.). The third plague is gnats; Augustine's text calls them tiny flies.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.29 (CSEL 34.2:202–204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-29).

## Letter 55.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:204–205
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine counts the fifty days from Passover to the giving of the law and interprets the law in the ark as sanctification in Christ's body.

### Latin text

Exodum lege et uide, ubi pascha celebrauerunt, post quot dies data sit lex. loquitur deus ad Moysen in heremo Sina die tertia tertii mensis. nota ergo unum diem ex ingressu ipsius tertii mensis et uide, quid dicat inter cetera: Descende, inquit, testare populo et purifica illos hodie et cras et lauent uestimenta sua et sint parati in diem tertium. tertia enim die descendet dominus in montem Sina coram omni populo. tunc data est lex tertia scilicet die tertii mensis. numera itaque a quarta decima primi mensis, quo factum est pascha, usque ad diem tertium tertii mensis, inuenies decem et septem primi mensis, triginta secundi, tres tertii, qui fiunt quinquaginta. lex in arca est sanctificatio in corpore domini, per cuius resurrectionem nobis requies futura promittitur, ad quam percipiendam sancto spiritu caritas inspiratur. spiritus autem nondum erat datus, quia Iesus nondum erat clarificatus. inde prophetia illa cantata est: Exsurge, domine, in requiem tuam, tu et arca sanctificationis tuae. ubi requies, ibi et sanctificatio. unde nunc ut amemus et desideremus, pignus accepimus. uocantur autem ad requiem alterius uitae, quo ab ista uita transitur, quod pascha significat, omnes in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti.

### English translation (Claude)

Read Exodus and see after how many days from their celebrating the Passover the law was given. God speaks to Moses in the desert of Sinai on the third day of the third month. Note, then, one day from the beginning of that third month, and see what he says among other things: 'Go down,' he says, 'charge the people and purify them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their garments and be ready for the third day. For on the third day the Lord will come down on Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people.' Then the law was given, namely on the third day of the third month. So count from the fourteenth of the first month, on which the Passover took place, to the third day of the third month: you will find seventeen days of the first month, thirty of the second, and three of the third, which make fifty. The law in the ark is the sanctification in the Lord's body, through whose resurrection future rest is promised to us; to receive it, love is breathed into us by the Holy Spirit. But the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet been glorified. Hence that prophecy was sung: 'Arise, O Lord, into your rest, you and the ark of your sanctification.' Where there is rest, there is also sanctification. Hence we have now received a pledge, so that we may love and desire it. And all are called to the rest of the other life, to which one passes from this life, which is what pascha signifies, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

### Scripture references

- Exod 19:1: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 19:11: quotation, high confidence
- John 7:39: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 132:8 (131:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 28:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Exod 19:1, 10–11; John 7:39; Ps 132:8 (131:8 LXX/Vulg.); allusion to Matt 28:19. Augustine's count of seventeen days in the first month includes the fourteenth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.30 (CSEL 34.2:204–205; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-30).

## Letter 55.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:205–207
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the 153 fish of John 21 as the triangular number of seventeen, the law's ten plus the Spirit's seven, signifying the saints at rest in the end.

### Latin text

Propterea quinquagenarius numerus ter multiplicatus addito ad eminentiam sacramenti ipso ternario in illis magnis piscibus inuenitur, quos dominus iam post resurrectionem nouam uitam demonstrans a dextera parte leuari imperauit; nec retia rupta sunt, quia tunc haereticorum inquietudo non erit. tunc homo perfectus et quietus, purgatus in anima et corpore per eloquia domini casta, argentum igne examinatum terrae, purgatum septuplum accipiet mercedem denarium, ut sint decem et septem. nam et in hoc numero sicut in aliis multiplices figuras exhibentibus sacramentum mirabile reperitur. nec inmerito etiam psalmus septimus decimus in regnorum libris solus integer legitur, quia regnum illud significat, ubi aduersarium non habebimus. titulus enim eius est: In die qua eruit eum dominus de manu omnium inimicorum eius et de manu Saul. quis enim figuratur in Dauid nisi ille, qui uenit secundum carnem ex semine Dauid? qui utique in corpore suo, quod est ecclesia, adhuc patitur inimicos. unde illi persecutori, quem uoce mactauit et in suum corpus traiciens quodam modo manducauit, sonuit de caelo: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? quando autem eruetur hoc corpus eius de manu omnium inimicorum eius, nisi cum et illa nouissima inimica destruetur mors? ad hoc tempus pertinet numerus ille centum quinquaginta trium piscium. nam et ipse numerus decem et septem surgens in trigonum centum quinquaginta trium summam complet. ab uno utique usque ad decem et septem surgens omnes medios adde et inuenies: ad unum scilicet adde duo, fiunt utique tria; adde tria, fiunt sex; adde quattuor, fiunt decem; adde quinque, fiunt quindecim; adde sex, fiunt uiginti unum; adde ita ceteros et ipsum septimum decimum, fiunt centum quinquaginta tria.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason the number fifty multiplied by three, with three itself added to emphasize the sacrament, is found in those great fish which the Lord, showing the new life after his resurrection, ordered to be drawn up on the right side; and the nets were not torn, because then there will be no restlessness of heretics. Then man, perfect and at rest, purified in soul and body by the pure words of the Lord, silver tried by fire in the earth, purified sevenfold, will receive the reward of the denarius, so that they make seventeen. For in this number too, as in others presenting manifold figures, a wonderful sacrament is found. Nor is it without reason that the seventeenth psalm alone is read entire in the books of Kingdoms, because it signifies that kingdom where we shall have no adversary. For its title is: 'On the day when the Lord delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul.' For who is figured in David but he who came according to the flesh from the seed of David? He still suffers enemies in his body, which is the church. Hence to that persecutor, whom he slew with his voice and, taking him into his own body, in a way ate, the voice from heaven sounded: 'Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?' And when will this body of his be delivered from the hand of all his enemies, except when that last enemy, death, is also destroyed? To that time belongs that number of a hundred and fifty-three fish. For the number seventeen itself, rising into a triangle, completes the sum of a hundred and fifty-three. Rising from one to seventeen, add all those in between and you will find it: to one add two, which makes three; add three, which makes six; add four, which makes ten; add five, which makes fifteen; add six, which makes twenty-one; add the rest in the same way, and seventeen itself, and they make a hundred and fifty-three.

### Scripture references

- John 21:6: allusion, high confidence
- John 21:11: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 12:6 (11:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 20:2: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 18:1 (17:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Sam 22:1: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions or quotations: John 21:6–11; Ps 12:6 (11:7 LXX/Vulg.); Matt 20:2 (the denarius); Ps 18 title (17:1 LXX/Vulg.), which is also 2 Sam 22; Rom 1:3; Acts 9:4; 1 Cor 15:26. Ten (the denarius, the law) plus seven (the sevenfold purification, the Spirit) makes seventeen.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.31 (CSEL 34.2:205–207; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-31).

## Letter 55.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:207
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes what rests on Scripture (Easter, Pentecost) from what rests on church agreement (Lent, the octave of the newly baptized) and from local variation (Alleluia, standing at prayer).

### Latin text

Haec de scripturis firmissime tenentur, id est pascha et pentecoste. ut quadraginta illi dies ante pascha obseruentur, ecclesiae consensio roborauit; sic etiam, ut octo dies neophytorum distinguantur a ceteris, id est ut octauus primo concinat. ut autem alleluia per illos solos dies quinquaginta in ecclesia cantetur, non usquequaque obseruatur; nam et aliis diebus uarie cantatur alibi atque alibi, ipsis tamen diebus ubique. ut autem stantes et in illis diebus et in omnibus dominicis oremus, utrum ubique seruetur, ignoro; tamen quid in eo sequatur ecclesia, dixi, ut potui, et arbitror esse manifestum.

### English translation (Claude)

These things are held most firmly from the Scriptures, namely Easter and Pentecost. That the forty days before Easter should be observed has been confirmed by the agreement of the church; likewise that the eight days of the newly baptized should be distinguished from the rest, that is, that the eighth should accord with the first. But that Alleluia should be sung in church only during those fifty days is not observed everywhere; for in different places it is sung variously on other days too, but on those days everywhere. Whether our praying standing, both on those days and on all Lord's days, is kept everywhere, I do not know; but what the church follows in it I have said as I could, and I think it is plain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.32 (CSEL 34.2:207; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-32).

## Letter 55.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-33
- Source: CSEL 34.2:207–208
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains the varying practice of foot-washing in the Easter season and the wish to keep it distinct from baptism.

### Latin text

De lauandis uero pedibus, cum hoc dominus propter humilitatis formam, quam docendam uenerat, commendauerit, sicut ipse consequenter exposuit, quaesitum est, quonam tempore potissimum res tanta etiam facto doceretur, et in illud tempus occurrit, quo ipsa commendatio religiosius inhaereret. sed ne ad ipsum baptismi sacramentum pertinere uideretur, multi hoc in consuetudinem recipere noluerunt. nonnulli etiam de consuetudine auferre non dubitauerunt. aliqui autem, ut hoc secretiore tempore commendarent et a baptismi sacramento distinguerent, uel diem tertium octauarum, quia et ternarius numerus in multis sacramentis maxime excellit, uel etiam ipsum octauum, ut hoc facerent, elegerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

As for washing feet: since the Lord commended this for the sake of the pattern of humility which he had come to teach, as he himself explained afterwards, the question was raised at what time so great a thing might best be taught by deed too, and that time came to mind at which the commendation itself would cling more devoutly. But lest it seem to belong to the sacrament of baptism itself, many have refused to adopt it as a custom; some have even not hesitated to remove it from custom. Others, in order to commend it at a more private time and to distinguish it from the sacrament of baptism, have chosen to do it either on the third day of the octave, since the number three is most excellent in many sacraments, or even on the eighth day itself.

### Scripture references

- John 13:14: allusion, high confidence
- John 13:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to John 13:14–15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.33 (CSEL 34.2:207–208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-33).

## Letter 55.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-34
- Source: CSEL 34.2:208–209
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine gives the rule for local customs: follow what helps a better life unless it causes greater harm, and he commends the singing of psalms against Donatist criticism.

### Latin text

Miror sane, quid ita uolueris, ut de his, quae uarie per diuersa loca obseruantur, tibi aliqua scriberem, cum et non sit necessarium et una in his saluberrima regula retinenda sit, ut, quae non sunt contra fidem neque bonos mores et habent aliquid ad exhortationem uitae melioris, ubicumque institui uidemus uel instituta cognoscimus, non solum non inprobemus, sed etiam laudando et imitando sectemur, aliquorum infirmitas non ita impedit, ut amplius detrimentum sit. si enim eo modo impedit, ut maiora studiosorum lucra speranda sint quam calumniatorum detrimenta metuenda, sine dubitatione faciendum est, maxime id quod etiam de scripturis defendi potest sicut de hymnis et psalmis canendis, cum et ipsius domini et apostolorum habeamus exemplum et praecepta. de hac re tam utili ad mouendum pie animum et accendendum diuinae dilectionis affectum uaria consuetudo est et pleraque in Africa ecclesiae membra pigriora sunt, ita ut Donatistae nos reprehendant, quod sobrie psallimus in ecclesia diuina cantica prophetarum, cum ipsi ebrietates suas ad canticum psalmorum humano ingenio compositorum quasi ad tubas exhortationis inflamment. quando autem non est tempus, cum in ecclesia fratres congregantur, sancta cantandi, nisi cum legitur aut disputatur aut antistites clara uoce deprecantur aut communis oratio uoce diaconi indicitur?

### English translation (Claude)

I wonder indeed why you wished me to write to you something about things that are observed variously in different places, since it is not necessary, and one most wholesome rule is to be kept in them: that whatever is not against faith or good morals and has something to encourage a better life, wherever we see it instituted or know it to have been instituted, we should not only not disapprove but even follow by praising and imitating it, provided that the weakness of some does not so hinder it that the loss is greater. For if it hinders only in such a way that greater gains are to be hoped for from the earnest than losses feared from the cavillers, it should be done without hesitation, especially what can also be defended from the Scriptures, such as the singing of hymns and psalms, since we have both the example and the precepts of the Lord himself and of the apostles. On this practice, so useful for moving the mind piously and kindling the affection of divine love, custom varies, and most members of the church in Africa are rather sluggish, so that the Donatists blame us because we sing soberly in church the divine songs of the prophets, while they inflame their drunkenness with the singing of psalms composed by human talent, as if with trumpets of exhortation. But when is it not the time, when the brothers are assembled in church, to sing holy things, except when there is reading or preaching, or the bishops pray aloud, or common prayer is announced by the deacon's voice?

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:30: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:19: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Jas 5:13: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 26:30; Eph 5:19; Col 3:16; Jas 5:13. The Latin of the proviso ('aliquorum infirmitas ... impedit') lacks a conjunction; translated by sense. The remark about Donatist singing is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.34 (CSEL 34.2:208–209; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-34).

## Letter 55.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-35
- Source: CSEL 34.2:209–210
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine deplores the multiplication of local observances not grounded in Scripture, councils, or universal custom, and would abolish them where possible.

### Latin text

Aliis uero particulis temporum quid melius a congregatis Christianis fiat, quid utilius, quid sanctius omnino non uideo. quod autem instituitur praeter consuetudinem, ut quasi obseruatio sacramenti sit, adprobare non possum, etiam si multa huius modi propter nonnullarum uel sanctarum uel turbulentarum personarum scandala deuitanda liberius inprobare non audeo. sed hoc nimis doleo, quam multa, quae in diuinis libris saluberrime praecepta sunt, minus curantur; et tam multis praesumptionibus sic plena sunt omnia, ut grauius corripiatur, qui per octauas suas terram nudo pede tetigerit, quam qui mentem uinolentia sepeliuerit. omnia itaque talia, quae neque sanctarum scripturarum auctoritatibus continentur nec conciliis episcoporum statuta inueniuntur nec consuetudine uniuersae ecclesiae roborata sunt, sed diuersorum locorum diuersis motibus innumerabiliter uariantur, ita ut uix aut omnino numquam inueniri possint causae, quas in eis instituendis homines secuti sunt, ubi facultas tribuitur, sine ulla dubitatione resecanda existimo. quamuis enim neque hoc inueniri possit, quo modo contra fidem sint, ipsam tamen religionem, quam paucissimis et manifestissimis celebrationum sacramentis misericordia dei esse liberam uoluit, seruilibus oneribus premunt, ut tolerabilior sit condicio Iudaeorum, qui, etiam si tempus libertatis non cognouerunt, legalibus tamen sarcinis, non humanis praesumptionibus subiciuntur. sed ecclesia dei inter multam paleam multaque zizania constituta multa tolerat et tamen, quae sunt contra fidem uel bonam uitam, nec adprobat nec tacet nec facit.

### English translation (Claude)

At other moments I do not see at all what could be done better, more usefully, or more holily by assembled Christians. But what is instituted beyond custom, so as to be observed as if it were a sacrament, I cannot approve, even if I do not dare to disapprove more freely of many things of this kind, in order to avoid offending certain persons, either holy or turbulent. But this grieves me greatly: that so many things most wholesomely commanded in the divine books are less cared for, and everything is so full of so many presumptions that a man who touches the ground with bare feet during his octave is rebuked more severely than one who has buried his mind in drunkenness. All such things, therefore, which are neither contained in the authorities of the holy Scriptures, nor found established by councils of bishops, nor confirmed by the custom of the universal church, but vary innumerably according to the different inclinations of different places, so that the reasons men followed in instituting them can hardly or never be found, I think should be cut away without any hesitation wherever the opportunity is given. For although it cannot be found how they are against faith, yet they burden with servile loads the very religion which the mercy of God willed to be free, with very few and very clear sacraments of celebration; so that the condition of the Jews is more tolerable, who, even if they have not recognized the time of freedom, are subject to the burdens of the law, not to human presumptions. But the church of God, set among much chaff and many tares, tolerates many things; and yet what is against faith or a good life she neither approves nor passes over in silence nor does.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The 'octave' is the week after baptism, when the newly baptized kept certain observances.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.35 (CSEL 34.2:209–210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-35).

## Letter 55.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-36
- Source: CSEL 34.2:210–212
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine condemns the view that meat is unclean as contrary to the faith, while upholding abstinence for self-control.

### Latin text

Itaque illud, quod scripsisti quosdam fratres ita temperare a carnibus edendis, ut inmundas arbitrentur, apertissime contra fidem sanamque doctrinam est. sed hinc ego si diutius disputare uoluero, potest putari a nonnullis obscure hinc apostolum praecepisse, qui etiam inter multa, quae de hac re dixit, sic detestatus est haereticorum impiam opinationem, ut diceret: Spiritus autem manifeste dicit, quia in nouissimis temporibus recedent quidam a fide adtendentes spiritibus seductoribus et doctrinis daemoniorum in hypocrisi mendaciloquorum cauteriatam habentes conscientiam suam, prohibentes nubere, abstinere a cibis, quos deus creauit ad percipiendum cum gratiarum actione fidelibus et his, qui cognouerunt ueritatem, quia omnis creatura dei bona est et nihil abiciendum, quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur; sanctificatur enim per uerbum dei et orationem. et alio loco de his rebus loquitur: Omnia, inquit, munda mundis; inmundis autem et infidelibus nihil est mundum, sed polluta sunt eorum et mens et conscientia. tu ipse lege cetera et recita, quibus potes. non in se inritam faciant gratiam dei, quia in libertate uocati sumus; tantum ne libertatem in occasionem carnis adsumant et ideo iam nolint refrenandae carnalis concupiscentiae causa a quibuslibet cibis temperare, quia non eis permittitur superstitiose atque infideliter facere.

### English translation (Claude)

So what you wrote, that certain brothers abstain from eating meat in such a way as to consider it unclean, is most plainly against faith and sound doctrine. But if I chose to argue this at greater length, some might think the apostle had given obscure instructions on it; he, among the many things he said on this matter, denounced the impious opinion of heretics in such a way as to say: 'Now the Spirit says plainly that in the last times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons, through the hypocrisy of liars whose conscience is seared, forbidding to marry and commanding abstinence from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and by those who know the truth; for every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.' And in another place he says of these things: 'To the pure all things are pure; but to the defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure, but both their mind and conscience are defiled.' Read the rest yourself and recite it to whom you can. Let them not make the grace of God void in themselves, since we were called to freedom; only let them not use freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, and so no longer be willing to abstain from any foods for the sake of curbing carnal desire, because they are not allowed to do so superstitiously and faithlessly.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 1:15: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:21: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 5:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Tim 4:1–5 and Titus 1:15; allusions to Gal 2:21 and Gal 5:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.36 (CSEL 34.2:210–212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-36).

## Letter 55.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-37
- Source: CSEL 34.2:212
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine disapproves of using the Gospels for fortune-telling by lot, though it is better than consulting demons.

### Latin text

Hi uero, qui de paginis euangelicis sortes legunt, etsi optandum est, ut hoc potius faciant, quam ad daemonia consulenda concurrant, tamen etiam ista mihi displicet consuetudo, ad negotia saecularia et ad uitae huius uanitatem propter aliam uitam loquentia oracula diuina uelle conuertere.

### English translation (Claude)

As for those who draw lots from the pages of the gospel, although it is to be wished that they would do this rather than run to consult demons, yet this custom too displeases me: wishing to turn divine oracles, which speak for the sake of another life, to secular business and the vanity of this life.

### Translation notes

- The practice of the sortes biblicae (opening the book at random for guidance).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.37 (CSEL 34.2:212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-37).

## Letter 55.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-38
- Source: CSEL 34.2:212–213
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects Januarius's flattery that nothing escapes him, confessing that he does not know far more of Scripture than he knows, but finds love in every passage.

### Latin text

Haec tibi satis esse ad ea, quae requisisti, si non putaueris, nimis ignoras et uires et occupationes meas. tantum enim absum ab eo, quod putasti nihil me latere, ut nihil in epistula tua legerim tristius, quia et apertissime falsum est et miror, quia hoc te latet, quod non solum in aliis innumerabilibus rebus multa me latent, sed etiam in ipsis sanctis scripturis multo nesciam plura, quam sciam. sed ideo spem in nomine Christi non infructuosam gero, quia non solum credidi deo meo in illis duobus praeceptis totam legem prophetasque pendere, sed etiam expertus sum experiorque cotidie, quando quidem nullum mihi sacramentum aut aliquis sermo admodum obscurior de sacris litteris aperitur, ubi non eadem praecepta reperiam: Finis enim praecepti est caritas de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta, et: Plenitudo legis caritas.

### English translation (Claude)

If you do not think this enough for what you asked, you know too little both of my strength and of my occupations. For I am so far from what you supposed, that nothing escapes me, that I have read nothing in your letter more saddening, since it is most plainly false; and I wonder that you are unaware that not only in countless other things is much hidden from me, but even in the holy Scriptures themselves I do not know far more than I know. But I have a hope in the name of Christ that is not fruitless for this reason: that I have not only believed my God that on those two commandments hang all the law and the prophets, but have also experienced it and experience it daily, since no sacrament or any rather obscure saying of the sacred writings is opened to me in which I do not find those same commandments: 'For the end of the commandment is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned', and: 'Love is the fulfilling of the law.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Matt 22:40; quotations of 1 Tim 1:5 and Rom 13:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.38 (CSEL 34.2:212–213; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-38).

## Letter 55.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-39
- Source: CSEL 34.2:213
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by warning that knowledge must serve love, which alone abides.

### Latin text

Itaque et tu, carissime, siue ista siue alia sic lege, sic disce, ut memineris uerissime dictum: Scientia inflat. caritas autem non aemulatur, non inflatur. sic itaque adhibeatur scientia tamquam machina quaedam, per quam structura caritatis adsurgat, quae manet in aeternum, etiam cum scientia destruetur, quae ad finem caritatis adhibita multum est utilis, per se autem ipsa sine tali fine non modo superflua sed etiam perniciosa probata est. scio autem, quae te cogitatio sancta custodiat sub umbraculo alarum domini dei nostri. sed ideo haec etsi breuiter monui, quoniam noui eandem ipsam caritatem tuam, quae non aemulatur, hanc epistulam multis daturam atque lecturam.

### English translation (Claude)

So you too, dearest friend, read and learn these things or others in such a way as to remember the most true saying: 'Knowledge puffs up'; but 'love does not envy, is not puffed up.' Let knowledge, then, be applied as a kind of scaffolding by which the structure of love may rise, which abides for ever, even when knowledge will be destroyed; knowledge, applied to the end of love, is very useful, but by itself, without such an end, it has been proved not only superfluous but even harmful. I know, however, what holy thought guards you under the shadow of the wings of the Lord our God. But I have given these admonitions, even if briefly, because I know that that same love of yours, which does not envy, will give this letter to many and read it to them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:8: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 17:8 (16:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of 1 Cor 8:1 and 1 Cor 13:4; allusions to 1 Cor 13:8 and Ps 17:8 (16:8 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 55.39 (CSEL 34.2:213; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-55-39).

## Letter 56.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-56-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:213–214
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Celer that, being away visiting his churches, he has sent the presbyter Optatus to read with him the promised material.

### Latin text

Promissi mei et tuae uoluntatis inmemor non sum. sed quoniam uisitandarum ecclesiarum ad meam pertinentium curam necessitate profectus sum, nec per me ipse debitum continuo reddere potui nec tibi tamen diutius deberi uolui, quod posset et me habente redhiberi. proinde carissimo filio presbytero Optato delegaui, ut eis horis, quas tibi opportuniores uideris, tecum legat ea, quae pollicitus sum. cum totum fieri posse persenserit, hoc etiam eximietas tua quam grate acceperit, tam inpigre atque acriter facere suadebit. quantum autem te diligam salubribusque studiis in rerum diuinarum atque humanarum cognitione oblectari atque exerceri uelim, credo, quod optime intellegas.

### English translation (Claude)

I have not forgotten my promise or your wish. But since I have had to set out on the necessary business of visiting the churches under my care, I could neither pay my debt at once in person nor, on the other hand, did I wish you to be owed any longer what could be paid even in my absence. So I have delegated our dearest son, the presbyter Optatus, to read with you, at the hours you find most convenient, the things I promised. When he perceives that the whole can be done, he will urge your Excellency to do as energetically and keenly as gratefully as you have received it. How much I love you, and how much I wish you to delight and exercise yourself in wholesome studies in the knowledge of things divine and human, I believe you understand very well.

### Translation notes

- To Celer, a Donatist layman of rank. The middle sentence is confused in the digital text; translated by sense. NPNF does not include this letter; checked against the Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 56.1 (CSEL 34.2:213–214; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-56-1).

## Letter 56.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-56-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:214–215
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Celer to leave the Donatists, admitting that breaking with habit is harder than seeing the truth.

### Latin text

Caritatem officii mei si non aspernaris, spero in ipsa fide Christiana et in moribus iam ita constitutae personae tuae congruis tales te prouectus habiturum, ut huius fumi uel uaporis temporalis, quae uita humana dicitur, ultimum diem, quem nulli mortalium euitare conceditur, uel auidus uel securus uel certe non desperate sollicitus non in uanitate erroris sed in soliditate ueritatis expectes. quam certum est enim tibi uiuere te, tam sit certum doctrina salutari istam uitam, quae in deliciis temporalibus agitur, in comparatione uitae aeternae, quae nobis per Christum atque in Christo promittitur, non uitam sed mortem esse deputandam. nullo modo autem dubitauerim de indole tua, quod ista consuetudine Donatistarum facillime te extrahes, si religiosissime ipsam Christianam puritatem non paruipenderis. quam inconcussis enim documentorum firmamentis error ille conuincatur, non magnum est etiam tardis ingenio, si tantum patienter atque intente audierint, peruidere. sed ad sectandam insolitam rectitudinem usitatae quasi familiaris peruersitatis uinculum abrumpere maiorum uirium est. et nequaquam desperandum adiuuante atque exhortante ipso domino deo nostro de generosa libertate atque plane uirili pectore tuo. incolumem te domini dei nostri misericordia tueatur, domine eximie meritoque honorabilis et dilectissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

If you do not despise the love that prompts my service, I hope that in the Christian faith itself, and in a manner of life befitting a person of your standing, you will make such progress that you may await the last day of this smoke or vapour of time, which is called human life, a day no mortal is allowed to escape, either eagerly or securely, or at least not with desperate anxiety, not in the vanity of error but in the solidity of truth. For let it be as certain to you through saving doctrine as it is certain that you are alive, that this life, which is spent in temporal pleasures, is to be counted not life but death, in comparison with the eternal life promised us through Christ and in Christ. I would not doubt at all, given your character, that you will very easily free yourself from this habit of the Donatists, if you do not make light of Christian purity itself, most religiously. For by how unshakable supports of documents that error is refuted is no great matter to see, even for those slow of wit, if only they listen patiently and attentively. But to break the chain of an accustomed and, as it were, familiar perversity in order to follow an unaccustomed rightness requires greater strength. And with the help and exhortation of the Lord our God himself, there is no reason at all to despair of your noble freedom and truly manly heart. May the mercy of the Lord our God keep you safe, my excellent lord and deservedly honoured and dearly beloved son.

### Scripture references

- Jas 4:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Jas 4:14 (life as a vapour).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 56.2 (CSEL 34.2:214–215; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-56-2).

## Letter 57.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-57-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:215
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds Celer of the book he lent him showing the Donatists have no case and offers further answers.

### Latin text

Nullam fuisse iustam causam, cur ab orbe terrarum, quo ecclesia catholica secundum prophetica et euangelica promissa diffunditur, se pars Donati dirimeret, credo, quod magis quoque considerans prudentia tua facillime intellegit. de qua re si diligentior disputatio necessaria est, memini me ad legendum dedisse beniuolentiae tuae codicem, cum id te petisse carissimus tuus mihi filius, meus Caecilius, intimasset. qui codex non paucis diebus apud te fuit. quem si rei huius cognoscendae studio uel inter occupationes tuas legere siue uoluisti siue potuisti, non dubito comperisse prudentiam tuam nihil eos habere, quod probabiliter contradicant. et si quid te forte adhuc mouet, quantum deus donat ac sinit, forte poterimus respondere interroganti aut ad legendum itidem aliquid dare, domine dilectissime meritoque honorabilis ac suscipiende fili.

### English translation (Claude)

That there was no just cause for the party of Donatus to separate itself from the whole world, through which the Catholic Church is spread according to the promises of the prophets and the gospel, I believe your prudence, considering it further, understands very easily. If a more careful discussion of this matter is necessary, I remember that I gave your Kindness a book to read, when your dear son Caecilius, also mine, told me that you had asked for it. That book was with you for not a few days. If, from a desire to know the matter, you either wished or were able to read it amid your occupations, I do not doubt that your prudence has found that they have nothing to say against it with any probability. And if anything still troubles you, as far as God grants and permits, we may perhaps be able to answer your question or likewise give you something to read, my dearly beloved and deservedly honoured lord and esteemed son.

### Translation notes

- To Celer. NPNF does not include this letter; checked against the Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 57.1 (CSEL 34.2:215; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-57-1).

## Letter 57.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-57-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:215–216
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Celer to promote Catholic unity among his tenants near Hippo and to help a Donatist friend who fears his own party.

### Latin text

Quapropter peto unitatem catholicam regioni Hipponiensi diligentius commendes hominibus tuis, maxime Paterno et Maurusio. uigilantiam cordis tui noui nec opus est, arbitror, plura scribere, cum, si uolueris, facillime possis, et quid alii curent et caueant in possessionibus tuis et in re tua quid agatur, addiscere. in re tua esse mihi ualde adfirmatum est amicum, cum quo cupio concordare; peto faueas ad hanc rem, ut et inter homines magnam laudem et apud deum habeas magnam mercedem. iam enim mihi per quendam Carum utriusque nostrum medium mandauerat se nescio quos uiolentos suos timere, ne faceret, quos in re tua et te fauente timere non poterit; nec ipse in eo debes diligere non constantiam sed plane pertinaciam. turpe est enim mutare sententiam sed ueram et rectam, nam stultam et noxiam etiam laudabile et salubre est. sicut autem constantia non sinit hominem deprauari, sic pertinacia non sinit corrigi; proinde sicut illa laudanda, sic ista emendanda est. presbyter, quem misi, reliqua tuae prudentiae planius intimabit. incolumem felicemque te dei misericordia tueatur, domine dilectissime meritoque honorabilis ac suscipiende fili.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore I ask you to commend Catholic unity more diligently to your people in the region of Hippo, especially Paternus and Maurusius. I know the watchfulness of your heart, and I think there is no need to write more, since, if you wish, you can very easily learn what others are concerned about and guard against on your estates, and what is going on in your property. I have been strongly assured that on your property there is a friend with whom I wish to come to agreement; I ask you to favour this, so that you may have great praise among men and a great reward with God. For he had already sent me word, through a certain Carus, a go-between for us both, that he feared some violent people of his own if he did this; but on your property and with your favour he cannot fear them. Nor ought you yourself to love in him not constancy but plain obstinacy. For it is shameful to change one's opinion, but a true and right one; to change a foolish and harmful one is even praiseworthy and wholesome. Just as constancy does not allow a man to be corrupted, so obstinacy does not allow him to be corrected; therefore, as the one is to be praised, so the other is to be amended. The presbyter whom I have sent will explain the rest more fully to your prudence. May the mercy of God keep you safe and happy, my dearly beloved and deservedly honoured lord and esteemed son.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 57.2 (CSEL 34.2:215–216; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-57-2).

## Letter 58.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:216–217
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine congratulates the Roman senator Pammachius on persuading his tenants in Numidia to leave the Donatists for Catholic unity.

### Latin text

Bona opera tua Christi gratia germinantia te nobis in membris eius honorandum et plane notissimum dilectissimumque fecerunt. neque enim, si cotidie faciem tuam uiderem, notior mihi esses, quam cum interiorem tuum pacis decorem pulchrum ac ueritatis luce radiantem in unius tui facti candore conspexi, conspexi et agnoui, agnoui et amaui. huic nunc loquor, huic scribo dilecto amico meo, qui mihi corpore absenti absens innotuit. uerum autem iam simul eramus et coniuncti sub uno capite uiuebamus, in cuius caritate nisi radicatus esses, non tibi tam dilecta catholica unitas foret nec colonos tuos Afros eo terrarum, unde Donatistarum furor exortus est, hoc est in media consulari Numidia constitutos tali admoneres adloquio, tanto feruore spiritus animares, ut deuotione promptissima ad sequendum eligerent, quod te tantum ac talem uirum non nisi agnita ueritate sequi cogitarent, et tam longe a te locorum interuallis remoti irent sub idem caput atque in eius membris tecum in aeternum deputarentur, cuius praecepto tibi temporaliter seruiunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Your good works, sprouting by the grace of Christ, have made you honoured among us in his members, and indeed most well known and dearly loved. For if I saw your face every day, you would not be better known to me than when I beheld your inner beauty of peace, lovely and radiant with the light of truth, in the brightness of one deed of yours; I beheld and recognized, I recognized and loved. To him I now speak, to him I write, my beloved friend, who, though absent, has become known to me, absent in body. But in truth we were already together and lived joined under one head, in whose love, had you not been rooted, Catholic unity would not have been so dear to you, nor would you have admonished your African tenants, settled in that part of the world from which the fury of the Donatists arose, that is, in the middle of Consular Numidia, with such an address, nor animated them with such fervour of spirit, that with most ready devotion they chose to follow what they thought so great and such a man as you would not follow unless the truth were known; and, though so far removed from you by distance, they went under the same head, and will be counted with you for ever among his members, by whose command they serve you in time.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 6:5: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- To Pammachius, a Roman senator and friend of Jerome. Allusions to Eph 3:17 and Eph 6:5 (servants obeying masters).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 58.1 (CSEL 34.2:216–217; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-1).

## Letter 58.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:217–218
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Pammachius that his letter cannot express the joy in his heart at his deed, and gives thanks to God.

### Latin text

In hoc ergo tuo facto te cognitum amplectens exultaui, ut gratularer tibi in Christo Iesu domino nostro tibique has gratulatorias litteras mitterem qualecumque specimen cordis et amoris erga te mei; neque enim amplius potui. sed quaeso, ne tu hactenus, quicquid te diligo, metiaris. perlectam transi hanc epistulam transitu inuisibili, qui intus fit, et perge cogitando in pectus meum et cerne, quid illic de te agatur. patebit enim oculo caritatis cubiculum caritatis, quod claudimus aduersus nugas tumultuosas saeculi, cum illic dominum adoramus, et uidebis ibi delicias laetitiae meae de tam bono opere tuo, quas nec lingua effari nec stilo exprimere ualeo, calentes atque flagrantes in sacrificio laudis eius, quo inspirante hoc uoluisti et quo adiuuante potuisti. gratias deo super inenarrabili dono.

### English translation (Claude)

Embracing you, then, known to me in this deed of yours, I rejoiced, so as to congratulate you in Christ Jesus our Lord and send you this letter of congratulation, a sample, such as it is, of my heart and love towards you; for I could do no more. But I beg you not to measure by this however much I love you. When you have read through this letter, pass on by the invisible passage that takes place within, and go in thought into my heart, and see what goes on there concerning you. For the chamber of love will lie open to the eye of love, the chamber which we close against the noisy trifles of the world when we worship the Lord there; and you will see there the delights of my joy at so good a deed of yours, which I can neither utter with the tongue nor express with the pen, warm and burning in the sacrifice of praise to him by whose inspiration you willed this and by whose help you were able. Thanks be to God for his inexpressible gift!

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 50:14 (49:14 LXX): allusion, low confidence
- 2 Cor 9:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 6:6 and Ps 50:14 (49:14 LXX/Vulg.); quotation of 2 Cor 9:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 58.2 (CSEL 34.2:217–218; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-2).

## Letter 58.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:218–219
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine wishes more senators would follow Pammachius's example and asks him to share the letter, commending its bearers.

### Latin text

O quam multorum tecum pariter senatorum pariterque sanctae ecclesiae filiorum tale opus desideramus in Africa, de quali tuo laetamur! sed illos periculosum est exhortari, tibi securum est gratulari. illi enim forte non facient et, tamquam nos in animo eorum uicerint inimici ecclesiae, decipiendis insidiabuntur infirmis; tu uero iam fecisti, unde inimici ecclesiae liberatis confundantur infirmis. proinde sufficere uisum est, ut ipse, quibus Christiano iure potueris, amica fiducia istam epistulam legas. sic enim ex tuo facto fieri posse in Africa credunt, quod forte dum putant fieri non posse, pigrescunt. insidias autem, quas ipsi haeretici distorto corde moliuntur, quoniam risi eos arbitratos ualere aliquid in possessione Christi animo tuo, nec scribere uolui. audies tamen haec a fratribus meis, quos plurimum commendo eximietati tuae, ne in tam magna tamque inopinata salute hominum, de quibus per te catholica mater exultat, aspernere etiam superflua metuentes.

### English translation (Claude)

O how we long in Africa for such a deed from many senators like you, and many sons of the holy church, as we rejoice over in yours! But it is dangerous to exhort them, safe to congratulate you. For they perhaps will not do it, and, as if the enemies of the church had defeated us in their minds, those enemies will lie in wait to deceive the weak; but you have already done what will confound the enemies of the church, now that the weak have been set free. So it has seemed enough that you yourself should read this letter, with friendly confidence, to those to whom you can by Christian right. For thus, from your deed, they will believe that what they perhaps grow slack about, thinking it cannot be done, can be done in Africa. As for the plots which the heretics themselves are contriving with distorted heart, since I laughed at them for thinking that they had any power in your mind against Christ's possession, I did not even wish to write of them. You will hear of them, however, from my brothers, whom I warmly commend to your Excellency, so that, in so great and unexpected a salvation of men, over whom the Catholic mother rejoices through you, you may not disdain them even if their fears are superfluous.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 58.3 (CSEL 34.2:218–219; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/55-24/#p-58-3).

## Letter 59.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-59-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:219–220
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine excuses himself to the primate Victorinus from a council, objecting to irregularities in the summons, including the omission of Xanthippus, who also claimed the primacy.

### Latin text

Tractoria ad me quinto Idus Nouembris uenit iam finito die et me ualde indispositum inuenit, ut occurrere omnino non possem. uerum tamen siue inperitiam meam mouerit siue iuste motus sim, tuae sanctitatis et grauitatis est arbitrari. legi in eadem tractoria etiam ad Mauretanias esse scriptum, quas prouincias scimus suos habere primates. quod si et ex eis ad Numidiam conuocandum esset concilium, oportuit utique, ut aliquorum Maurorum episcoporum, qui illic priores sunt, nomina in tractoria ponerentur; quod in ista tractoria non reperiens multum miratus sum. deinde ad ipsos Numidas ita perturbato et neglecto ordine scriptum, ut nomen meum tertio loco inuenerim, qui noui, quam post multos episcopus factus sim. quae res et aliis iniuriosa est satis et mihi inuidiosa. praeterea uenerabilis frater et collega noster Xanthippus Tagonensis dicit, quod eum primatus ipse contingat, et erga plurimos sic habetur et tales mittit epistulas, qui etiam error si facile inter uestram sanctitatem cognosci et corrigi potest, non debuit tamen in tractoria, quam misit uenerabilitas tua, nomen eius praetermitti. quod si in mediis locis conscriberetur et non in primo poneretur, multum mirarer; quanto magis mirandum est, quod nulla tibi eius admemoratio facta est, qui maxime ad concilium uenire debuit, ut de ipso primatus ordine, quae causa omnium Numidarum episcopis t ecclesiarum primatus, ageretur.

### English translation (Claude)

The letter of summons came to me on the fifth day before the Ides of November, when the day was already over, and found me very unprepared, so that I could not possibly attend. Nevertheless, whether my lack of experience has moved me, or I have been moved justly, it is for your Holiness and Gravity to judge. I read in that same summons that it had been written also to the Mauretanias. We know that those provinces have their own primates. If a council had to be summoned to Numidia from them too, the names of some Mauretanian bishops who are senior there ought certainly to have been placed in the summons; and not finding this in this summons, I was very surprised. Then, to the Numidians themselves it was written with such a disturbed and neglected order that I found my name in the third place, I who know after how many I was made bishop. This is both injurious enough to others and invidious to me. Moreover, our venerable brother and colleague Xanthippus of Thagura says that the primacy belongs to him, is so regarded by very many, and sends letters as such. Even if this error can easily be recognized and corrected between your Holinesses, his name ought nevertheless not to have been passed over in the summons which your Venerableness sent. If it had been written in the middle and not placed first, I would be very surprised; how much more surprising is it that no mention at all was made by you of him who above all ought to come to the council, so that the very order of the primacy, which is the concern of all the bishops and churches of Numidia, might be dealt with.

### Translation notes

- To Victorinus, who claimed to be primate of Numidia. The fifth day before the Ides of November is 9 November. The last clause is corrupt in the digital text ('episcopis t ecclesiarum'); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 59.1 (CSEL 34.2:219–220; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-59-1).

## Letter 59.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-59-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:220–221
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that the dispute over the Numidian primacy be settled by the senior bishops before any council is summoned.

### Latin text

His de causis etiam uenire dubitarem, ne forte falsa esset tractoria, qua tanta peruersitas appareret, quamquam et angustia temporis et aliae graues necessitates me multipliciter impedirent. unde peto beatitudinem tuam, ut mihi ignoscas et primo instare digneris, ut inter tuam sanctimoniam et senem Xanthippum concorditer constet, quis uestrum debet conuocare concilium; aut certe, quod salubrius arbitror, sine cuiusquam praeiudicio ambo conuocate collegas nostros, eos maxime, qui uobis episcopatus aetate uicini sunt, qui facile, quis uestrum uerum dicat, agnoscant, ut inter uos paucos eadem prae ceteris quaestio dirimatur et errore sublato minores a ceteris conuocentur, qui nec possunt nec debent nisi uobis in hac re tamquam prioribus credere et nunc ignorant, cui uestrum potissimum credant. hanc epistulam signatam misi anulo, qui exprimit faciem hominis adtendentis in latus.

### English translation (Claude)

For these reasons I would even hesitate to come, lest perhaps the summons, in which such perversity appeared, should be false; although the shortness of time and other serious necessities also hindered me in many ways. So I ask your Blessedness to pardon me, and first to be good enough to press for it to be settled harmoniously between your Holiness and the aged Xanthippus which of you ought to summon the council; or at least, what I think more wholesome, both of you summon our colleagues without prejudice to either, especially those who are near you in seniority as bishops, who can easily recognize which of you speaks the truth; so that this question may be settled first among you few, and once the error is removed, the junior bishops may be summoned by the others, who neither can nor ought to do anything in this matter but believe you as their seniors, and who do not now know which of you they should rather believe. I have sent this letter sealed with a ring which shows the face of a man looking sideways.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 59.2 (CSEL 34.2:220–221; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-59-2).

## Letter 60.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-60-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:221–222
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine advises Aurelius against ordaining monks who have deserted their monastery, lest it be said that a bad monk makes a good cleric.

### Latin text

Litteras nullas tuae uenerabilitatis, ex quo ab inuicem corporaliter digressi sumus, accepi. nunc uero legi epistulam benignitatis tuae de Donato et fratre eius et, quid responderem, diu fluctuaui. sed tamen etiam atque etiam cogitanti, quid sit utile saluti eorum, quibus nutriendis in Christo seruimus, nihil mihi aliud occurrere potuit nisi non esse istam uiam dandam seruis dei, ut facilius se putent eligi ad aliquid melius, si facti fuerint deteriores. et ipsis enim facilis lapsus et ordini clericorum fit indignissima iniuria, si desertores monasteriorum ad militiam clericatus eliguntur, cum ex his, qui in monasterio permanent, non tamen nisi probatiores atque meliores in clerum adsumere soleamus, nisi forte, sicut uulgares dicunt malus choraula bonus symphoniacus est ita idem ipsi uulgares de nobis iocabuntur dicentes malus monachus bonus clericus est. nimis dolendum, si ad tam ruinosam superbiam monachos subrigimus et tam graui contumelia clericos dignos putamus, in quorum numero sumus, cum aliquando etiam bonus monachus uix bonum clericum faciat, si adsit ei sufficiens continentia et tamen desit instructio necessaria aut personae regularis integritas.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received no letter from your Venerableness since we parted from each other in body. But now I have read your Kindness's letter about Donatus and his brother, and I have long wavered about what to answer. But considering again and again what is useful for the salvation of those whom we serve by nourishing them in Christ, nothing else could occur to me but that this way should not be opened to servants of God, that they should think they are more easily chosen for something better if they have become worse. For it is both an easy fall for them and a most unworthy injury to the clerical order, if deserters from monasteries are chosen for the service of the clergy, since even of those who remain in the monastery we are accustomed to take into the clergy only the more tested and better. Unless perhaps, as common people say, 'A bad piper makes a good chorister,' so the same common people will joke about us, saying: 'A bad monk makes a good cleric.' It is greatly to be lamented if we raise monks to such ruinous pride, and think the clergy, in whose number we are, worthy of so grave an insult, since sometimes even a good monk hardly makes a good cleric, if he has sufficient self-restraint but lacks the necessary instruction or the integrity of a man under a rule.

### Translation notes

- To Aurelius of Carthage. The proverb contrasts a choraula (a solo piper) with a symphoniacus (a member of a band).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 60.1 (CSEL 34.2:221–222; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-60-1).

## Letter 60.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-60-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:222
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the two monks left his monastery against his will and leaves the decision about them to Aurelius.

### Latin text

Sed de istis, credo, arbitrata sit beatitudo tua, quod nostra uoluntate, ut suis potius conregionalibus utiles essent, de monasterio recessissent. sed falsum est; sponte abierunt. sponte deseruerunt nobis, quantum potuimus, pro eorum salute renitentibus. et de Donato quidem, quia iam factum est, ut, antequam de hac re aliquid in concilio statueremus, ordinaretur, si forte a superbiae peruersitate correctus est, quod uult, faciat prudentia tua. de fratre uero eius, in cuius uel maxime causa de monasterio etiam ipse Donatus abscessit, cum intellegas, quid sentiam, nescio, quid respondeam. contradicere tamen prudentiae tuae, honori caritatique non audeo et sane spero id te facturum, quod membris ecclesiae salubre perspexeris. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

But concerning these men, I believe, your Blessedness supposed that they had left the monastery with our consent, so as to be more useful to the people of their own region. But it is false; they left of their own accord; of their own accord they deserted, while we resisted as much as we could for their salvation. As for Donatus, since it has already happened that he was ordained before we could decide anything about this in council, let your prudence do what it wishes, if perhaps he has been corrected from the perversity of pride. But as for his brother, on whose account above all Donatus himself also left the monastery, since you understand what I think, I do not know what to answer. Yet I do not dare to contradict your prudence, rank, and love, and I certainly hope that you will do what you see to be wholesome for the members of the church. Amen.

### Translation notes

- The council referred to is the Council of Carthage of 401, which legislated on this matter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 60.2 (CSEL 34.2:222; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-60-2).

## Letter 61.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-61-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:222–223
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out for Theodorus the terms on which Donatist clergy are received: their error is rejected, their baptism and the name of God they bear are honoured.

### Latin text

Cum beniuolentia tua mecum loqueretur, quo modo susceperimus clericos ex parte Donati, si uoluerint esse catholici. placuit mihi illud, quod tibi respondi, etiam hac ad te data epistula............. et, si quis de hac re te interrogauerit, etiam manu mea prolata, quod de hac re sentiamus uel faciamus, ostendas. scias ergo nos non in eis detestari nisi dissensionem ipsorum, per quam schismatici uel haeretici facti sunt, quia ecclesiae catholicae unitatem et ueritatem non tenent in eo, quod pacem cum populo dei non habent, qui toto terrarum orbe diffunditur, et in eo, quod in hominibus baptismum Christi non agnoscunt. inprobamus ergo malum errorem, quia suum habent; bonum autem nomen quod dei habent et sacramentum eius agnoscimus in eis et ueneramur et amplectimur. sed propterea dolemus errantes et eos per caritatem Christi lucrari deo cupimus, ut sanctum sacramentum, quod foris ab ecclesia habent ad perniciem, in pace ecclesiae habeant ad salutem. si ergo tollantur de medio mala hominum et honorentur in hominibus bona dei, erit fraterna concordia et amabilis pax, ut in cordibus hominum uincat persuasionem diaboli caritas Christi.

### English translation (Claude)

When your Kindness was speaking with me about how we receive clergy from the party of Donatus if they wish to be Catholics, I resolved to put what I answered you in writing also, in this letter sent to you, so that, if anyone asks you about this matter, you may show what we think or do about it, produced even in my own hand. Know, then, that we detest nothing in them but their dissension, by which they have become schismatics or heretics, because they do not hold the unity and truth of the Catholic Church, in that they do not have peace with the people of God, which is spread through the whole world, and in that they do not recognize the baptism of Christ in men. We disapprove, then, of the evil error, because it is their own; but the good name of God which they have, and his sacrament, we recognize in them, revere, and embrace. But for this reason we grieve over them as erring and long to win them for God through the love of Christ, so that the holy sacrament which they have outside the church to their destruction they may have in the peace of the church to their salvation. If, then, the evils of men are taken out of the way, and the good things of God in men are honoured, there will be brotherly concord and lovely peace, so that in the hearts of men the love of Christ may conquer the persuasion of the devil.

### Translation notes

- To Theodorus. There is a gap marked in the digital text after 'epistula'; the missing verb is supplied by sense ('to put in writing').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 61.1 (CSEL 34.2:222–223; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-61-1).

## Letter 61.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-61-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:223–224
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Donatists coming to the Catholic Church keep their baptism, orders, and vows, and receive the love and unity that make these profitable.

### Latin text

Itaque cum ad nos ueniunt ex parte Donati, mala illorum non suscipimus, id est dissensionem et errorem, sed ipsa tollantur de medio tamquam impedimenta concordiae, et amplectimur fratres stantes cum eis, sicut dicit apostolus, in unitate spiritus in uinculo pacis et agnoscentes in eis bona dei, siue sanctum baptismum siue benedictionem ordinationis siue continentiae professionem siue consignationem uirginitatis siue fidem trinitatis et si qua alia sunt, quae omnia, etiam si erant, nihil tamen proderant, quando caritas non erat. quis autem uere dicit se habere Christi caritatem, quando eius non amplectitur unitatem? cum ergo ad catholicam ueniunt, non hic accipiunt, quod habebant: ut prodesse illis incipiat, quod habebant, accipiunt hic, quod non habebant; hic enim radicem caritatis in uinculo pacis et in societate unitatis, ut non ad damnationem sed ad liberationem illis ualeant omnia, quae habent, sacramenta ueritatis. non enim debent gloriari sarmenta, quia non sunt spinarum ligna sed uitis. si enim non in radice uixerint, cum tota specie sui in ignem mittentur. de quibusdam autem ramis fractis dixit apostolus, quia potens est deus iterum inserere illos. et ideo, dilectissime frater, quoscumque illorum uideris forte dubitantes, quo ordine suscipiantur a nobis, ostende illis istam, quam bene nosti, manum meam et, si eam habere uoluerint, habeant, quia testem deum facio super animam sic eos me suscepturum, ut non solum baptismum Christi, quem acceperunt, ipsum habeant sed etiam honorem pactimonii et continentiam.

### English translation (Claude)

So when they come to us from the party of Donatus, we do not receive their evils, that is, dissension and error; these are taken out of the way as obstacles to concord, and we embrace them as brothers, standing with them, as the apostle says, in the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace, and recognizing in them the good things of God: whether holy baptism, or the blessing of ordination, or the profession of continence, or the consecration of virginity, or faith in the Trinity, and whatever else there is; all of which, even if they were there, profited nothing, since love was not there. For who truly says that he has the love of Christ when he does not embrace his unity? So when they come to the Catholic Church, they do not receive here what they had; so that what they had may begin to profit them, they receive here what they did not have. For here they receive the root of love in the bond of peace and in the fellowship of unity, so that all the sacraments of truth which they have may avail them not for condemnation but for deliverance. For branches ought not to boast that they are not the wood of thorns but of the vine; for if they do not live in the root, they will be thrown into the fire with all their fine appearance. But of certain broken branches the apostle said that God is able to graft them in again. And so, dearest brother, whoever of them you see perhaps doubting on what terms they are received by us, show them this handwriting of mine, which you know well; and if they wish to have it, let them have it; for I call God to witness on my soul that I will receive them in such a way that they will keep not only the baptism of Christ which they received, but also the honour of their sacred profession and their continence.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 15:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:23: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations or allusions: Eph 4:3; 1 Cor 13:3; John 15:6; Rom 11:23; 2 Cor 1:23. 'Who truly says' reads quis for the printed quia. 'Sacred profession' renders the obscure printed word pactimonii, probably a slip for a word meaning holy life (perhaps sanctimonii).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 61.2 (CSEL 34.2:223–224; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-61-2).

## Letter 62.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-62-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:224–225
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius, Augustine, and Samsucius report to Severus on their inquiry at Subsana into the affair of the reader Timothy, and apologize for a discourtesy to his messengers.

### Latin text

Cum Subsanam uenissemus et, quae illic nobis absentibus contra nostram uoluntatem gesta fuerant, quaereremus, quaedam, sicut audieramus, quaedam uero aliter facta, omnia tamen dolenda et toleranda, quantum dominus adiuuit, partim obiurgando, partim monendo, partim orando correximus. illud sane, quod post tuae sanctitatis profectionem nos plurimum contristauit, quod inde fratres sine itineris duce dimissi sunt, petimus ignoscas et timidius quam malitiosius factum scias. cum enim putarent eos a filio nostro Timotheo propterea mitti, ut in nos maxime caritatem tuam ad iracundiam prouocarent, uellent autem ipsi nostro aduentui, quem tecum futurum sperabant, omnia integra reseruare, putauerunt non eos profecturos, si ducem itineris non acciperent. sed tamen peccatum esse quis dubitet? hinc etiam factum est, ut et Fossori diceretur iam Timotheum cum ipsis fratribus fuisse profectum. quod utique falsum erat, non tamen a presbytero dictum; et haec omnia fratrem Carcedonium penitus ignorasse nobis manifestissime declaratum est, quantum ista manifestari solent.

### English translation (Claude)

When we came to Subsana and inquired into what had been done there in our absence and against our will, we found some things done as we had heard, others otherwise, but all to be lamented and borne; and, as far as the Lord helped, we corrected them partly by rebuking, partly by admonishing, partly by praying. As for what grieved us most after your Holiness's departure, that the brothers were sent away from there without a guide for the journey, we ask you to forgive it and to know that it was done more from timidity than from malice. For since they thought that those brothers were being sent by our son Timothy expressly to provoke your Charity to anger against us, and since they themselves wished to keep everything untouched for our arrival, which they hoped would be together with you, they thought that the brothers would not set out if they did not get a guide for the journey. Yet who doubts that it was a sin? Hence it also came about that Fossor was told that Timothy had already set out with those brothers. This was certainly false, but it was not said by the presbyter; and it has been most plainly shown to us, as far as such things are usually shown, that brother Carcedonius was wholly ignorant of all these things.

### Translation notes

- To Severus, bishop of Milevis, from Alypius, Augustine, and Samsucius. Timothy was a reader of Augustine's church who had sworn to stay with Severus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 62.1 (CSEL 34.2:224–225; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-62-1).

## Letter 62.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-62-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:225–226
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops explain that Timothy will abide by their joint decision, his oath binding only his own will, and ask Severus to agree.

### Latin text

Sed quid pluribus inmoremur? memoratus filius noster Timotheus uehementissime perturbatus, quod dubietatem tam inopinatam inuitissimus senserit, indicauit nobis, quod, dum ageres cum illo, ut apud Subsanam deo seruiret, erupit et iurauit a te omnino non recessurum. cumque eius uoluntatem requireremus, respondit se hac iuratione impediri, quo minus ibi esset, ubi eum esse etiam antea uolebamus, cum iam praesertim de suae libertatis manifestatione securus sit. cumque illi aperuissemus non eum futurum periurii reum, si non per ipsum sed per te fieret, ut propter uitandum scandalum tecum esse non posset, quando quidem non de tua uoluntate sed de sua iurare potuerit nec te sibi uicissim aliquid iurasse confessus sit, ad extremum dixit, quod seruum dei, ecclesiae filium dicere oportebat, quicquid nobis cum tua sanctitate de illo fieri placuisset, id se sine dubio secuturum. proinde petimus et per caritatem Christi obsecramus prudentiam tuam, ut omnium, quae locuti sumus, memineris et rescriptis tuis nos laetifices. debemus enim nos firmiores, si tamen inter tanta temptationum pericula hoc dicere audendum est, sicut ait apostolus, infirmorum onera sustinere. frater Timotheus ideo non scripsit sanctitati tuae, quia omnia, quae gesta sunt, sanctus frater tuus significauit. memor nostri in domino glorieris, domine beatissime et uenerabiliter carissime et sincerissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

But why dwell on this further? Our son Timothy, very greatly disturbed at having, much against his will, fallen into so unexpected an uncertainty, told us that, while you were urging him to serve God at Subsana, he burst out and swore that he would never leave you at all. And when we asked what he wished, he answered that he was prevented by this oath from being where we had wished him to be even before, especially now that he is assured by the clear proof of his freedom. And when we had shown him that he would not be guilty of perjury if it came about not through him but through you that he could not be with you, to avoid scandal, since he could swear about his own will and not yours, and he admitted that you had not sworn anything to him in return, he finally said, as a servant of God and a son of the church ought to say, that whatever we, together with your Holiness, decided about him he would follow without hesitation. Therefore we ask and beseech your prudence, by the love of Christ, to remember all that we said, and to gladden us by your reply. For we who are stronger (if indeed this may be said amid such great dangers of temptations) ought, as the apostle says, to bear the burdens of the weak. Brother Timothy has not written to your Holiness because your holy brother has reported everything that happened. Mindful of us, may you glory in the Lord, most blessed lord and venerably dear and most sincere brother.

### Scripture references

- Rom 15:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Rom 15:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 62.2 (CSEL 34.2:225–226; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-62-2).

## Letter 63.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:226–227
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Severus's complaint, explaining that Timothy was ordained subdeacon at Subsana without his consent.

### Latin text

Si dicam, quae me ipsa causa cogit dicere, ubi erit sollicitudo caritatis? si autem non dicam, ubi erit libertas amicitiae? uerum tamen fluctuans interim elegi me purgare potius quam te arguere. scripsisti te mirari cum dolore nostro nos tolerare uoluisse, quod correctione emendari potuisset, quasi non sint dolenda, quae male facta sunt, etiam si, quantum possunt, postea corriguntur, aut non id maxime tolerandum sit, quod, cum manifestum sit perperam factum, fieri non possit infectum. desine itaque mirari, frater sincerissime. nam ordinatus est apud Subsanam subdiaconus Timotheus praeter meum consilium et uoluntatem, cum, quid de illo agendum esset, adhuc inter nostras alternas sententias deliberatio nataret. ecce adhuc doleo, quamuis iam ad te redierit, in quo nos tuae uoluntati paruisse non paenitet.

### English translation (Claude)

If I say what the case itself compels me to say, where will be the solicitude of love? But if I do not say it, where will be the frankness of friendship? Yet, wavering meanwhile, I have chosen rather to clear myself than to accuse you. You wrote that you wondered that we had been willing to tolerate, with grief to ourselves, what could have been amended by correction; as if what has been done wrongly were not to be grieved over, even if afterwards it is corrected as far as possible; or as if that were not above all to be tolerated which, though it is plain that it was done wrongly, cannot be undone. So stop wondering, most sincere brother. For Timothy was ordained subdeacon at Subsana without my counsel and against my will, while the deliberation about what should be done with him was still floating between our differing opinions. See, I still grieve, although he has now returned to you, in which we do not regret having obeyed your will.

### Translation notes

- To Severus of Milevis.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 63.1 (CSEL 34.2:226–227; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-1).

## Letter 63.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:227–228
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains how he rebuked those responsible, admonished Timothy and Carcedonius, and prayed, before Timothy left for Milevis.

### Latin text

Audi etiam, quid obiurgando, quid monendo, quid orando correxerimus et ante, quam hinc esset profectus, ne adhuc tibi propterea uideatur nihil a nobis tunc fuisse correctum, quia nondum ad uos ipse redierat. obiurgando correximus primo ipsum, qui tibi non obtemperauit, ut inconsulto fratre Carcedonio ad tuam sanctitatem ante proficisceretur, unde origo huius nostrae tribulationis exorta est; deinde presbyterum et Verinum, per quos, ut ordinaretur, factum esse comperimus. cum enim omnes obiurgantibus nobis haec omnia non recte facta esse confessi sunt et, ut sibi ignosceretur, rogauerunt, nimis superbe, si non crederemus esse correctos. neque enim agere poterant, ut facta non essent; sed nec nos aliud obiurgando agebamus, nisi ut se male egisse cognoscerent et dolerent. monendo autem correximus primo omnes, ut deinceps talia non auderent, ne iram dei experirentur. deinde praecipue Timotheum, qui sola iuratione se cogi dicebat ad tuam pergere caritatem, ut, si sanctitas tua, quod fore sperabamus, considerans, quae simul locuti fuerimus, propter infirmorum scandalum, pro quibus Christus mortuus est, et propter ecclesiae disciplinam, quam periculose neglegunt, quoniam hic iam lector esse coeperat, nolles eum esse tecum, iam liber a uinculo iurationis aequissimo animo deo seruiret, cui sumus rationem nostrorum actuum reddituri. ipsum quoque fratrem Carcedonium, quantum potuimus, monendo ad hoc perduxeramus, ut etiam ipse patientissime acciperet, quicquid de illo fieri conseruandae ecclesiasticae disciplinae prouisio et necessitas cogeret. orando autem correxeramus nos ipsos, ut et gubernationes et exitus consiliorum nostrorum misericordiae dei commendaremus et, si quid indignationis nos momorderat, sub illius medicinalem dexteram confugiendo sanaremur. ecce quam multa partim obiurgando, partim monendo, partim orando correxeramus.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear too what we corrected by rebuking, admonishing, and praying, even before he set out from here, lest it still seem to you that nothing was corrected by us then because he had not yet returned to you. By rebuking we corrected first Timothy himself, who disobeyed you by setting out to your Holiness earlier without consulting brother Carcedonius, from which the origin of this tribulation of ours arose; then the presbyter and Verinus, through whom, we found, his ordination was brought about. For when all of them, as we rebuked them, confessed that all these things had not been done rightly and asked to be forgiven, it would have been too proud of us not to believe them corrected. For they could not bring it about that these things had not been done; but neither did we aim at anything else by rebuking than that they should recognize that they had acted wrongly and be sorry. By admonishing we corrected, first, all of them, that they should not dare such things in future, lest they experience the wrath of God; then especially Timothy, who said that only his oath compelled him to go to your Charity, that, if your Holiness, considering what we had said together, should not wish him to be with you, as we hoped would happen, because of the scandal to the weak, for whom Christ died, and because of church discipline, which they dangerously neglect (since he had already begun to be a reader here), he should then, free from the bond of the oath, serve God with a most even mind, to whom we shall render account of our actions. Brother Carcedonius himself too we had brought, as far as we could, by admonishing, to accept most patiently whatever provision for and necessity of preserving church discipline might require to be done about him. By praying we had corrected ourselves, so as to commend to the mercy of God both the guidance and the outcome of our counsels, and, if any indignation had stung us, to be healed by taking refuge under his healing right hand. See how much we had corrected, partly by rebuking, partly by admonishing, partly by praying.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 1 Cor 8:11 (the weak for whom Christ died).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 63.2 (CSEL 34.2:227–228; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-2).

## Letter 63.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:228
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that for the sake of love he and Carcedonius agreed to return Timothy to Severus.

### Latin text

Et nunc considerantes uinculum caritatis, ut non possideamur a satana, non enim ignoramus mentes eius, quid aliud facere debuimus nisi obtemperare uoluntati tuae, qui non putasti, quod factum est, corrigi potuisse, nisi ipse, in quo tibi iniuriam factam esse conquereris, iuri tuo redderetur? hoc etiam frater ipse Carcedonius quamuis non post leuem animi perturbationem, de qua peto ut ores pro illo, tamen Christum in te cogitans aequanimiter fecit. et cum adhuc ego, utrum apud nos remorante Timotheo alias ad tuam germanitatem litteras mitterem, cogitandum putarem, ueritus est ipse paternam commotionem tuam et praecidit deliberationem meam non solum sinens sed etiam instans, ut tibi Timotheus redderetur.

### English translation (Claude)

And now, considering the bond of love, so that we may not be possessed by Satan (for we are not ignorant of his designs), what else ought we to have done but obey your will, since you did not think that what had been done could be corrected unless the man himself, in whose case you complain that you were wronged, were restored to your jurisdiction? Brother Carcedonius himself also did this with an even mind, thinking of Christ in you, though not without considerable disturbance of mind, for which I ask you to pray for him. And while I still thought I should consider whether to send another letter to your Brotherliness while Timothy stayed with us, he himself feared your fatherly displeasure and cut short my deliberation, not only allowing but even urging that Timothy be returned to you.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 2:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 2 Cor 2:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 63.3 (CSEL 34.2:228; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-3).

## Letter 63.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:228–229
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Severus to judge whether Timothy, who had read publicly several times, was not already a reader of Hippo, and warns that such oaths would undermine church discipline.

### Latin text

Ego autem, frater Seuere, causam meam iudicio tuo dimitto. certus sum enim Christum habitare in corde tuo, per quem te obsecro, ut ipsum consulas tuae menti sibi subditae praesidentem, utrum homo, qui in ecclesia meae dispensationi credita iam legere coeperat et non semel sed iterum et tertio apud Subsanam et presbytero Subsanensis ecclesiae comitatus et apud Turres et apud Cizau et apud Verbalis legerat, non fuisse lector possit aut debeat iudicari. et sicut nos, quod postea nobis inuitis factum est, deo iubente correximus, sic et tu, quod prius te nesciente factum est, eodem iubente similiter corrige. neque enim uereor, ne tu parum intellegas, quantus aditus aperitur ad dissoluendum ordinem ecclesiasticae disciplinae. si alterius ecclesiae clericus cuicumque iurauerit, quod ab ipso non sit recessurus, eum secum esse permittat ideo se facere adfirmans, ne auctor sit eius periurii, cum profecto, qui hoc non sinet nec illum apud ipsum remanere permittet, quia de se, non de altero iurare potuit, ipse pacificam regulam sine aliqua reprehensione custodiat.

### English translation (Claude)

But I, brother Severus, leave my case to your judgement. For I am sure that Christ dwells in your heart, by whom I beseech you to consult him as he presides over your mind, which is subject to him, whether a man who had already begun to read in the church entrusted to my stewardship, and had read not once but a second and third time at Subsana, and, accompanying the presbyter of the church of Subsana, at Turres, at Cizau, and at Verbalis, can or ought to be judged not to have been a reader. And just as we, at God's command, corrected what was done afterwards against our will, so you too, at the same command, correct likewise what was done earlier without your knowledge. For I have no fear that you fail to understand how wide a door is opened to dissolving the order of church discipline if a cleric of one church swears to anyone that he will not leave him, and that person allows him to stay with him, claiming that he does so in order not to be the cause of his perjury; whereas surely the one who does not allow this, and will not permit him to remain with him, keeps the peaceable rule without any blame, since the cleric could swear only about himself and not about another.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Eph 3:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 63.4 (CSEL 34.2:228–229; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-63-4).

## Letter 64.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:229–230
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine encourages the presbyter Quintianus, who is under church discipline, to wait patiently in hope.

### Latin text

Nos non dedignamur aspicere corpora minus pulchra, praesertim cum ipsae animae nostrae nondum pulchrae sint, sicut eas futuras speramus, cum ille ineffabiliter pulcher nobis apparuerit, in quem modo non uidentes credimus; tunc enim similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est. quod et tu de anima tua, si libenter et fraterne me accipis, admonemus ut sentias nec eandem pulchram esse praesumas, sed, quem ad modum apostolus praecipit, in spe gaudeas et, quod sequitur, facias; sic enim dicit: Spe gaudentes, in tribulatione patientes; spe enim salui facti sumus; sicut rursus idem ipse dicit: Spes autem, quae uidetur, non est spes; quod enim uidet quis, quid sperat? si autem, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus. haec patientia in te non deficiat et in bona conscientia sustine dominum et uiriliter age et confortetur cor tuum et sustine dominum.

### English translation (Claude)

We do not disdain to look at bodies that are less beautiful, especially since our own souls are not yet beautiful, as we hope they will be when he who is ineffably beautiful appears to us, in whom we now believe without seeing; for then we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. We admonish you, if you receive me gladly and as a brother, to think so of your soul too, and not to presume that it is beautiful, but, as the apostle commands, to rejoice in hope and to do what follows; for he says: 'Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation'; for in hope we have been saved; as again the same apostle says: 'Hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.' May this patience not fail in you; and in a good conscience wait for the Lord, act manfully, let your heart be strengthened, and wait for the Lord.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 27:14 (26:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Quintianus, a presbyter whose case was pending before Aurelius. Quotations or allusions: 1 Pet 1:8; 1 John 3:2; Rom 12:12; Rom 8:24–25; Ps 27:14 (26:14 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 64.1 (CSEL 34.2:229–230; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-1).

## Letter 64.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:230
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains to Quintianus that he cannot receive him into communion while Aurelius has not, but has passed his complaint on to Aurelius.

### Latin text

Manifestum est quidem, quod, si ad nos uenires uenerabili episcopo Aurelio non communicans, nec apud nos posses communicare; sed ea caritate nos faceremus, qua et illum facere non dubitamus. nec ideo tamen onerosus nobis esset aduentus tuus, quia et te oportet aequo animo facere pro ecclesiae disciplina praesertim salua conscientia, quam tu nosti et deus. neque enim et ille, si causam tuam discutiendam distulit, odio tuo fecit et non necessitatibus suis, quas tu si ita nosses, quem ad modum tuam nosti, nec mirareris nec contristareris. quod etiam de nostris petimus credas, quia similiter eas non potes nosse. sunt autem maiores nobis et auctoritate digniores et loco uiciniores episcopi, per quos facilius possitis ad curam uestram pertinentes ecclesiae causas exequi. nec ego tamen tacui apud uenerabilem et debita mihi pro eius meritis honorificentia suscipiendum fratrem et collegam meum senem Aurelium tribulationem uestram et querimoniam litterarum uestrarum, sed per exemplum epistulae tuae innocentiam tuam ei perferre curaui. litteras autem tuas uel pridie uel ante biduum natalis domini accepi, quando illum insinuasti ad ecclesiam Badesilitanam uenturum, a qua timetis dei plebem conturbari atque corrumpi. quapropter per litteras quidem adloqui plebem uestram non audeo; rescribere autem eis, qui mihi scriberent, possem; ultro autem ad plebem scribere, quae dispensationi meae commissa non est, unde possem?

### English translation (Claude)

It is indeed plain that, if you came to us while not in communion with the venerable bishop Aurelius, you could not communicate with us either; but we would do this with the same love with which we do not doubt he does it. Nor would your coming be burdensome to us on that account, since you too ought to act with an even mind for the sake of church discipline, especially with a clear conscience, which you and God know. For neither has he, if he has postponed the examination of your case, done so out of hatred for you rather than because of his own pressing duties; if you knew them as you know your own, you would neither wonder nor be saddened. We ask you to believe the same of ours, since likewise you cannot know them. There are bishops greater than we, more worthy in authority and nearer in place, through whom you could more easily pursue the cases of the church in your charge. Yet I have not kept silent about your tribulation and the complaint of your letter to my venerable brother and colleague, the aged Aurelius, whom I am bound to esteem with the honour due to his merits, but I have taken care to convey your innocence to him by a copy of your letter. I received your letter either the day before or two days before the Lord's birthday, in which you indicated that he was coming to the church of Badesila, by which you fear the people of God will be disturbed and corrupted. Therefore I do not dare to address your people by letter. I could reply to those who wrote to me; but to write of my own accord to a people not committed to my stewardship, how could I?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 64.2 (CSEL 34.2:230; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-2).

## Letter 64.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:230–231
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes Quintianus for having non-canonical scriptures read in church and clarifies the council's rules on receiving clergy and monks.

### Latin text

Verum tamen, quod tibi uni dico, qui mihi scripsisti, per te ipsum perueniat ad eos, quibus opus est dici. uos ipsi prius nolite in scandalum mittere ecclesiam legendo in populis scripturas, quas canon ecclesiasticus non recepit; his enim haeretici et maxime Manichaei solent inperitas mentes euertere, quos in campo uestro libenter latitare audio. miror ergo prudentiam tuam, quod me admonueris, ut iubeam non recipi eos, qui ad nos a nobis ad monasterium ueniunt, ut, quod statutum est a nobis in concilio, permaneret, et tu non memineris in concilio institutum, quae sint scripturae canonicae, quae in populo dei legi debeant. recense ergo concilium et omnia, quae ibi legeris, commenda memoriae; et ibi etiam inuenies de solis clericis fuisse statutum, non etiam de laicis, ut undecumque uenientes non recipiantur in monasterium, non quia monasterii facta mentio est, sed quia sic institutum est, ut clericum alienum nemo suscipiat. recenti autem concilio statutum est, ut de aliquo monasterio qui recesserint uel proiecti fuerint, non fiant alibi clerici aut praepositi monasteriorum. si ergo de Priuatione te aliquid mouit, scias eum a nobis nondum esse susceptum in monasterium; sed causam ipsius ad senem Aurelium misi, ut, quod de illo statuerit, hoc faciam. miror enim, utrum iam potest lector deputari, qui non nisi semel scripturas etiam non canonicas legit. si enim propterea iam ille lector ecclesiasticus, profecto et illa scriptura ecclesiastica est; si autem illa scriptura ecclesiastica non est, quisquis eam quamuis in ecclesia legerit, ecclesiasticus lector non est. tamen de isto adulescente, quod memorato antistiti uisum fuerit, hoc oportet obseruem.

### English translation (Claude)

Nevertheless, what I say to you alone, who wrote to me, let it reach through you those to whom it needs to be said. You yourselves, first of all, do not scandalize the church by reading to the people Scriptures which the church's canon has not received; for by these heretics, and especially the Manichees, are accustomed to overturn untrained minds, and I hear that they are gladly hiding in your district. So I wonder at your prudence, that you admonished me to order that those who come from you to us, to the monastery, should not be received, so that what was decreed by us in council might stand, and you do not remember what was laid down in council as to which are the canonical Scriptures that ought to be read among the people of God. So go over the council again and commit to memory all that you read there; and there you will also find that the decree was only about clergy, not also about laymen, that those coming from anywhere should not be received into the monastery; not that a monastery was mentioned, but it was laid down that no one should receive another's cleric. But at a recent council it was decreed that those who have left or been expelled from any monastery should not become clerics or superiors of monasteries elsewhere. So if anything about Privatio has troubled you, know that he has not yet been received into the monastery by us; but I have sent his case to the aged Aurelius, so that I may do whatever he decides about him. For I wonder whether one can already be counted a reader who has read Scriptures only once, and those not canonical. For if he is on that account a church reader, then that scripture too is church Scripture; but if that scripture is not church Scripture, whoever reads it, even in church, is not a church reader. However, about this young man I must observe whatever the said bishop decides.

### Translation notes

- The councils are the Council of Hippo (393), confirmed at Carthage (397), which listed the canonical books, and the Council of Carthage (401). The particular non-canonical book read is not named.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 64.3 (CSEL 34.2:230–231; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-3).

## Letter 64.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:231–232
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine supports the people of Vigesila in refusing a bishop deposed by a plenary council of Africa.

### Latin text

Plebs autem Vigesilitana uobiscum nobis in uisceribus Christi carissima si episcopum in plenario Africae concilio degradatum suscipere noluerit, sano capite faciet et nec cogi potest nec debet. et quisquis eam uiolenter coegerit, ostendet, qualis sit, et, qualis ante fuerit, quando de se nihil mali credi uolebat, faciet intellegi. nullus enim sic proditur, qualem causam habuerit, quam ille, qui per saeculares potestates uel quaslibet uiolentias cum perturbatione et querela conatur recipere honorem, quem perdidit. non uult enim uolenti Christo seruire sed Christianis nolentibus dominari. frater, cauti estote; multum astutus est diabolus; sed Christus dei sapientia est.

### English translation (Claude)

But if the people of Vigesila, very dear to us as to you in the heart of Christ, refuse to receive a bishop degraded in a plenary council of Africa, they will act with sound judgement; and they neither can nor should be compelled. And whoever compels them by violence will show what he is, and will make it understood what he was before, when he wished nothing bad to be believed of himself. For no one betrays what kind of case he had so much as one who tries, through secular powers or any kind of violence, with disturbance and complaint, to recover the rank he has lost. For he does not wish to serve Christ, who wills it, but to lord it over Christians who do not will it. Brother, be careful; the devil is very cunning; but Christ is the wisdom of God.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 1 Cor 1:24. The deposed bishop is not named here.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 64.4 (CSEL 34.2:231–232; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-64-4).

## Letter 65.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-65-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:232–233
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports to the primate Xanthippus his removal of the presbyter Abundantius for embezzlement and for dining and staying with a woman of bad reputation on a fast day.

### Latin text

Officio debito meritis tuis salutans dignationem tuam tuisque me orationibus ualde commendans insinuo prudentiae tuae Abundantium quendam in fundo Strabonianensi pertinente ad curam nostram ordinatum fuisse presbyterum. qui cum non ambularet uias seruorum dei, non bonam famam habere coeperat. qua ego conterritus non tamen temere aliquid credens sed plane sollicitior factus operam dedi, si quo modo possem ad aliqua malae conuersationis eius certa indicia peruenire. ac primo comperi eum pecuniam cuiusdam rusticani diuino apud se commendato interuertisse, ita ut nullam inde posset probabilem reddere rationem. deinde conuictus atque confessus est die ieiunii natalis domini, quo etiam Gippitana ecclesia sicut ceterae ieiunabant, cum tamquam perrecturus ad ecclesiam suam <uale) fecisset collegae suo presbytero Gippitano, hora ferme quinta, et cum secum nullum clericum haberet, in eodem fundo restitisse et apud quandam malae famae mulierem et prandisse et cenasse et in eadem domo mansisse. in huius autem hospitio iam quidam clericus noster Hipponiensis remotus erat; et hoc quia iste optime nouerat, negare non potuit, nam quae negauit, deo dimisi iudicans, quae occultare permissus non est. timui ei committere ecclesiam praesertim inter haereticorum circumlatrantium rabiem constitutam. et cum me rogaret, ut ad presbyterum fundi Armenianensis in campo Bullensi, unde ad nos deuenerat, causa eius insinuata litteras darem, ne quid de illo atrocius suspicaretur, ut illic uiuat, si fieri potest, sine officio presbyterii correctior, misericordia commotus feci. haec autem me praecipue prudentiae tuae intimare oportebat, ne aliqua tibi fallacia subreperet.

### English translation (Claude)

Greeting your Worthiness with the duty owed to your merits, and commending myself warmly to your prayers, I inform your prudence that a certain Abundantius was ordained presbyter on the estate of Strabonia, which belongs to our charge. Since he did not walk in the ways of the servants of God, he had begun to have a bad reputation. Alarmed by this, though not rashly believing anything, but plainly made more anxious, I took pains to see whether I could in any way arrive at some sure evidence of his bad conduct. First I found that he had embezzled money of a certain countryman entrusted to him as a sacred deposit, so that he could give no plausible account of it. Then he was convicted and confessed that on the fast day of the Lord's birthday, when the church of Gippi too was fasting like the others, after he had said farewell to his colleague the presbyter of Gippi, at about the fifth hour, as if he were going to his own church, and having no cleric with him, he stayed on the same estate, both lunched and dined at the house of a certain woman of bad reputation, and stayed in the same house. In this woman's lodging a certain cleric of ours from Hippo was already staying; and because that man knew it very well, he could not deny it; what he denied I left to God, judging what he was not allowed to conceal. I was afraid to entrust a church to him, especially one placed amid the fury of heretics barking round it. And when he asked me to give him a letter to the presbyter of the Armenian estate in the district of Bulla, from which he had come to us, explaining his case, so that nothing worse might be suspected of him, so that he might live there, if possible, more corrected, without the office of presbyter, I did so, moved by pity. But I had especially to inform your prudence of these things, lest some deception creep up on you.

### Translation notes

- To Xanthippus, primate of Numidia. The fifth hour is late morning. 'Was already staying' renders remotus erat, taken as 'was lodging there apart'; it could also mean that a cleric had earlier been removed from office over this woman.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 65.1 (CSEL 34.2:232–233; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-65-1).

## Letter 65.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-65-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:233–235
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains to Xanthippus that he removed Abundantius on clear evidence, and that he cannot entrust a congregation to such a man whatever others decide.

### Latin text

Audiui autem causam eius, cum centum dies essent ad dominicum paschae, qui futurus est VIII Id. Aprilis. hoc propter concilium insinuare curaui uenerabilitati tuae, quod etiam ipsi non celaui, sed ei fideliter, quid institutum esset, aperui. et si intra annum causam suam, si forte sibi aliquid agendum putat, agere neglexerit, deinceps eius uocem nemo audiat. nos autem, domine beatissime et uenerabiliter suscipiende pater, si haec indicia malae conuersationis clericorum, maxime cum fama non bona eos coeperit comitari, non putauerimus nisi eo modo uindicanda, quo in concilio constitutum est, incipimus cogi ea, quae sciri non possunt, uelle discutere et aut incerta damnare aut uere incognita praeterire. ego certe presbyterum, ut qui die ieiunii, quo eiusdem loci etiam ecclesia ieiunabat, uale faciens collegae suo eiusdem loci presbytero apud famosam mulierem nullum secum clericum habens remanere et prandere et cenare ausus est et in una domo dormire, remouendum ab officio presbyterii arbitratus sum timens ei deinceps ecclesiam dei committere. quod si forte iudicibus ecclesiasticis aliud uidetur, quia sex episcopis causam presbyteri terminare concilio statutum est, committat illi, qui uult, ecclesiam suae curae commissam; ego talibus, fateor, quamlibet plebem committere timeo, praesertim quos nulla bona fama defendit, ut hoc eis possit ignosci, ne, si quid perniciosius eruperit, languens inputem mihi.

### English translation (Claude)

I heard his case when there were a hundred days to the Lord's day of Easter, which will be on the eighth day before the Ides of April. I have taken care to inform your Venerableness of this because of the council, which I did not conceal from him either, but faithfully told him what had been decreed; that if within a year he neglects to bring his case, if he thinks he has any case to bring, no one should hear his voice thereafter. But, most blessed lord and venerably esteemed father, if we think that such evidence of bad conduct in clerics, especially when a bad reputation has begun to accompany them, is to be punished only in the way decreed in the council, we begin to be compelled to wish to examine what cannot be known, and either to condemn what is uncertain or to pass over what is truly unknown. I certainly judged that a presbyter who, on a fast day, when the church of that place too was fasting, after saying farewell to his colleague the presbyter of the same place, dared to stay with a notorious woman, having no cleric with him, to lunch and dine and sleep in one house, should be removed from the office of presbyter, fearing to entrust the church of God to him thereafter. But if perhaps the church judges think otherwise, since the council decreed that the case of a presbyter should be settled by six bishops, let whoever wishes entrust to him the church committed to his care; I confess that I fear to entrust any people whatever to such men, especially those whom no good reputation defends, so that this could be forgiven them; lest, if anything more harmful breaks out, I should blame myself in grief.

### Translation notes

- Easter on the eighth day before the Ides of April is 6 April (in 402). The council of Carthage (397) set a year's limit for appeal and six bishops for a presbyter's case.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 65.2 (CSEL 34.2:233–235; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-65-2).

## Letter 66.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-66-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:235–236
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes the Donatist bishop Crispinus for rebaptizing, by pressure, the tenants of an estate he had bought at Mappalia.

### Latin text

Deum quidem timere debuisti; sed quia in rebaptizandis Mappaliensibus sicut homo timeri uoluisti, cur non ualeat iussio regalis in prouincia, si tantum ualuit iussio prouincialis in uilla? si personas compares, tu possessor, ille imperator; si loca compares, tu in fundo, ille in regno; si causas compares, ille ut diuisio resarciatur, tu ut unitas diuidatur. sed nos te de homine non terremus. nam possemus agere, ut decem libras auri secundum imperatoria iussa persolueres. an forte propterea non habes, unde reddas, quod dare iussi sunt rebaptizatores, dum multum erogas, ut emas, quos rebaptizes? sed nos, ut dixi, de homine te non terremus; Christus te potius terreat. cui uolo scire quid respondeas, si tibi dicat: Crispine, carum fuit pretium tuum ad emendum timorem Mappaliensium et uilis mors mea ad emendum amorem omnium gentium? plus ualuit rebaptizandis colonis tuis, quod numeratum est de saeculo tuo, quam baptizandis populis meis, quod manauit de latere meo? scio te plura audire posse, si Christo aurem praebeas, et ex ipsa tua possessione admoneri, quam impia contra Christum loquamini. si enim humano iure praesumis firme te possidere, quod emisti argento tuo, quanto firmius diuino iure possidet Christus, quod emit sanguine suo! et ille quidem inconcusse possidebit totum, de quo dictum est: Dominabitur a mari usque ad mare et a flumine usque ad terminos orbis terrae. sed certe quo modo confidis non te perditurum, quod in Africa uideris emisse, qui Christum dicis toto orbe perdito ad solam Africam remansisse?

### English translation (Claude)

You ought indeed to have feared God; but since in rebaptizing the people of Mappalia you wished to be feared as a man, why should a royal command not have force in a province, if a provincial command had so much force on an estate? If you compare persons, you are a landowner, he is emperor; if you compare places, you are on an estate, he is in a kingdom; if you compare causes, he acts so that division may be mended, you so that unity may be divided. But we do not frighten you with man. For we could act so that you would pay ten pounds of gold according to the imperial orders. Or perhaps you do not have the means to pay what rebaptizers have been ordered to pay, because you spend so much to buy people to rebaptize? But, as I said, we do not frighten you with man; let Christ rather frighten you. I want to know what you would answer him if he said to you: 'Crispinus, was your price dear for buying the fear of the people of Mappalia, and my death cheap for buying the love of all nations? Did what was counted out of your worldly goods avail more for rebaptizing your tenants than what flowed from my side avails for baptizing my peoples?' I know you could hear more if you lent your ear to Christ, and be warned from your very possession how impiously you speak against Christ. For if by human law you presume that you possess firmly what you bought with your silver, how much more firmly does Christ by divine law possess what he bought with his blood! And he will possess unshaken the whole, of which it was said: 'He shall have dominion from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth.' But how can you be confident that you will not lose what you seem to have bought in Africa, when you say that Christ, having lost the whole world, has remained in Africa alone?

### Scripture references

- John 19:34: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Crispinus, Donatist bishop of Calama. The imperial law fining rebaptizers ten pounds of gold is that of Theodosius (392). Quotation of Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX/Vulg.); allusion to John 19:34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 66.1 (CSEL 34.2:235–236; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-66-1).

## Letter 66.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-66-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:236–237
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that the Mappalia tenants hear both bishops, with an interpreter in Punic, and choose freely.

### Latin text

Quid multa? si uoluntate sua Mappalienses in tuam communionem transierunt, ambos nos audiant, ita ut scribantur, quae dicimus, et a nobis subscripta eis Punice interpretentur, et remoto timore dominationis eligant, quod uoluerint. ex his enim, quae dicimus, apparebit, utrum coacti in falsitate remaneant, an uolentes teneant ueritatem. si enim haec non intellegunt, qua temeritate traduxisti non intellegentes? si autem intellegunt, ambos, ut dixi, audiant et, quod uoluerint, faciant. si quae etiam plebes ad nos transierunt, quas putas a dominis coactas, hoc et ibi fiat; ambos nos audiant et eligant, quod placuerit. si autem non uis hoc fieri, cui non appareat non uos de ueritate praesumere? sed cauenda est ira dei et hic et in futuro saeculo. adiuro te per Christum, ut ad ista respondeas.

### English translation (Claude)

Why say more? If the people of Mappalia went over to your communion of their own will, let them hear us both, in such a way that what we say is written down and, signed by us, is interpreted to them in Punic; and, with fear of their master removed, let them choose what they wish. For from what we say it will appear whether they remain in falsehood under compulsion or hold the truth willingly. For if they do not understand these things, with what rashness did you bring them over without understanding? But if they understand, let them hear us both, as I said, and do what they wish. If any peoples too have come over to us whom you think compelled by their masters, let the same be done there; let them hear us both and choose what they please. But if you do not want this done, to whom will it not be plain that you do not trust in the truth? But the wrath of God must be guarded against, both here and in the world to come. I adjure you by Christ to answer these things.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 66.2 (CSEL 34.2:236–237; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-66-2).

## Letter 67.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:237–238
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Jerome he has heard his letter arrived and blames the lack of reply on some hindrance.

### Latin text

Audiui peruenisse in manus tuas litteras meas; sed quod adhuc rescripta non merui, nequaquam inputauerim dilectioni tuae; aliquid procul dubio impedimenti fuit. unde agnosco a me dominum potius deprecandum, ut tuae uoluntati det facultatem mittendi, quod rescripseris, nam rescribendi iam dedit, quia, cum uolueris, facillime poteris.

### English translation (Claude)

I have heard that my letter has reached your hands; but that I have not yet been favoured with a reply I would by no means charge to your Affection; something no doubt has hindered it. So I recognize that I should rather pray the Lord to give your will the means of sending what you have written in reply; for he has already given you the means of writing it, since you can do so very easily whenever you wish.

### Translation notes

- Letter from Augustine to Jerome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 67.1 (CSEL 34.2:237–238; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-1).

## Letter 67.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:238–239
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine denies having written a book against Jerome and sent it to Rome, and invites Jerome's frank criticism of his writings.

### Latin text

Etiam hoc ad me sane perlatum utrum quidem crederem, dubitaui, sed hinc quoque tibi aliquid utrum scriberem, dubitare non debui. hoc autem breue est: suggestum caritati tuae a nescio quibus fratribus mihi dictum est, quod librum aduersus te scripserim Romamque miserim. hoc falsum esse noueris; deum nostrum testor hoc me non fecisse. sed si forte aliqua in aliquibus scriptis meis reperiuntur, in quibus aliter aliquid quam tu sensisse reperiar, non contra te dictum, sed quod mihi uidebatur, a me scriptum esse puto te debere cognoscere aut, si cognosci non potest, credere. ita sane hoc dixerim, ut ego non tantum paratissimus sim, si quid te in meis scriptis mouerit, fraterne accipere, quid contra sentias, aut de correctione mea aut de ipsa tua beniuolentia gauisurus, uerum etiam hoc a te postulem ac flagitem.

### English translation (Claude)

This too has been reported to me, and I hesitated whether to believe it; but I ought not to hesitate whether to write you something about it as well. It is brief: I have been told that some brothers or other have suggested to your Charity that I wrote a book against you and sent it to Rome. Know that this is false; I call our God to witness that I have not done it. But if perhaps some things are found in some of my writings in which I am found to have thought otherwise than you on some point, I think you ought to recognize, or, if it cannot be recognized, to believe, that it was not said against you but written by me as it seemed to me. I would say this, indeed, in such a way that I am not only most ready, if anything in my writings has troubled you, to receive in a brotherly way what you think against it, ready to rejoice either in my correction or in your goodwill itself, but also ask and beg this of you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 67.2 (CSEL 34.2:238–239; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-2).

## Letter 67.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:239–240
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine wishes he could live near Jerome and asks him to keep up their friendship by letter.

### Latin text

O si licuisset etsi non cohabitante saltem uicino te in domino perfrui ad crebrum et dulce conloquium! sed quia id non est datum, peto, ut hoc ipsum, quod in Christo, quam possimus, simul simus, conseruare studeas et augeri ac perfici et rescripta quamuis rara non spernere. saluta obsequio meo sanctum fratrem Paulinianum et omnes fratres, qui tecum ac de te in domino gaudent. memor nostri exaudiaris a domino in omni sancto desiderio, domine carissime et desiderantissime et honorande in Christo frater.

### English translation (Claude)

O, if it had been possible, if not living with you, at least as your neighbour, to enjoy you in the Lord in frequent and sweet conversation! But since this has not been granted, I ask you to strive to preserve this very thing, that we are together in Christ as far as we can be, and to increase and perfect it, and not to despise replies, however rare. Greet with my respects the holy brother Paulinianus and all the brothers who rejoice with you and in you in the Lord. Remembering us, may you be heard by the Lord in every holy desire, my dearest and most longed-for lord, and brother to be honoured in Christ.

### Translation notes

- Paulinianus was Jerome's brother.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 67.3 (CSEL 34.2:239–240; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/59-1/#p-67-3).

## Letter 68.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:240–241
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome tells Augustine that a letter attributed to him, urging Jerome to retract on Galatians, has circulated in copies, and asks whether it is genuine.

### Latin text

In ipso profectionis articulo sancti filii nostri Asterii hypodiaconi beatitudinis tuae ad me litterae peruenerunt, quibus satis facis te contra paruitatem meam librum Romam non misisse. hoc nec ego factum audieram, sed epistulae cuiusdam quasi ad me scriptae per fratrem nostrum Sisinnium diaconum huc exemplaria peruenerunt, in qua hortaris me, ut παλινῳδίαν super quodam apostoli capitulo canam et imiter Stesichorum inter uituperationem et laudes Helenae fluctuantem, ut, qui detrahendo oculos perdiderat, laudando receperit. ego simpliciter fateor dignationi tuae, licet stilus et ἐπιχειρήματα tua mihi uiderentur, tamen non temere exemplaribus litterarum credendum putaui, ne forte me respondente laesus iuste expostulares, quod probare ante debuissem tuum esse sermonem et sic rescribere. accessit ad moram sanctae et uenerabilis Paulae longa infirmitas. dum enim languenti multo tempore adsidemus, paene epistulae tuae uel eius, qui sub tuo nomine scripserat, obliti sumus memores illius uersiculi: Musica in luctu importuna narratio. itaque si tua est epistula, aperte scribe uel mitte exemplaria ueriora, ut absque ullo rancore stomachi in scripturarum disputatione uersemur et uel nostrum emendemus errorem uel alium frustra reprehendisse doceamus.

### English translation (Claude)

At the very moment of departure of our holy son Asterius the subdeacon, your Blessedness's letter reached me, in which you assure me that you did not send a book against my littleness to Rome. I had not heard that this was done either; but copies of a certain letter, as if written to me, have come here through our brother Sisinnius the deacon, in which you urge me to sing a palinode on a certain chapter of the apostle, and to imitate Stesichorus, wavering between blame and praise of Helen, so that he who had lost his eyes by disparaging might recover them by praising. I simply confess to your Worthiness that, although the style and the arguments seemed to me to be yours, I did not think I should rashly believe copies of a letter, lest perhaps, if I replied and you were hurt, you should justly complain that I ought first to have proved the discourse to be yours and then written back. Added to the delay was the long illness of the holy and venerable Paula. For while we sat for a long time by her sickbed, we almost forgot your letter, or the letter of him who had written in your name, mindful of that little verse: 'Music in mourning is an untimely tale.' So if the letter is yours, write openly, or send truer copies, so that without any rancour of temper we may engage in the discussion of the Scriptures, and either correct our own error or show that another has censured us in vain.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Stesichorus (Stesichorus): allusion, high confidence
- Sir 22:6 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter from Jerome to Augustine. The letter in question is Augustine's Letter 40 (cf. 40.7). Stesichorus was said to have been blinded for slandering Helen and cured by his recantation. 'Music in mourning is an untimely tale' is Sir 22:6. Paula is probably the younger Paula. The Greek word is restored from a misread letter in the digital text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 68.1 (CSEL 34.2:240–241; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-1).

## Letter 68.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:241–243
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome disclaims any wish to attack Augustine's books but warns the younger man not to provoke an old one, citing Persius and Virgil.

### Latin text

Absit autem a me, ut quicquam de libris beatitudinis tuae adtingere audeam. sufficit enim mihi probare mea et aliena non carpere. ceterum optime nouit prudentia tua unumquemque in suo sensu abundare et puerilis esse iactantiae, quod olim adulescentuli facere consueuerant, accusando inlustres uiros suo nomini famam quaerere. nec tam stultus sum, ut diuersitate explanationum tuarum me laedi putem, quia nec tu laederis, si nos contraria senserimus. sed illa est uera inter amicos reprehensio, si nostram peram non uidentes aliorum iuxta Persium manticam consideremus. superest, ut diligas diligentem et in scripturarum campo iuuenis senem non prouoces. nos nostra habuimus tempora et cucurrimus, quantum potuimus. nunc te currente et longa spatia transmittente nobis debetur otium simulque, ut cum uenia et honore tuo dixerim, ne solus mihi de poetis aliquid proposuisse uidearis, memento Daretis et Entelli et uulgaris prouerbii, quod bos lassus fortius figat pedem. tristes haec dictauimus. utinam mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus!

### English translation (Claude)

Far be it from me to dare to touch anything in your Blessedness's books. For it is enough for me to approve my own and not to pick at others'. Moreover, your prudence knows very well that each one abounds in his own sense, and that it is a mark of childish boasting, as young men used to do long ago, to seek fame for one's own name by accusing illustrious men. Nor am I so foolish as to think myself injured by the difference of your interpretations, since neither are you injured if we think the opposite. But that is true reproach among friends, if, not seeing our own bag, we look at the wallet of others, as Persius says. It remains that you love one who loves you, and that in the field of the Scriptures you, a young man, do not challenge an old one. We have had our time and have run as far as we could. Now that you are running and covering long distances, rest is owed to us; and at the same time, if I may say so with your leave and with respect to you, so that you may not seem to be the only one to have put forward something from the poets, remember Dares and Entellus, and the common proverb that the tired ox plants its foot more firmly. We have dictated this in sadness. If only we might be worthy of your embraces, and in mutual conference either teach or learn something!

### Scripture references

- Rom 14:5: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Persius, 4.24 (Persius, Satires): allusion, high confidence
- Virgil, Aen. 5.362–484 (Virgil): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Each one abounds in his own sense' echoes Rom 14:5. Persius, Satires 4.24 (the wallet on our back). Dares and Entellus: Virgil, Aeneid 5.362–484, the young boxer beaten by the old one.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 68.2 (CSEL 34.2:241–243; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-2).

## Letter 68.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:243
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome mentions his reply to the abuse of 'Calpurnius Lanarius' and assures Augustine of his affection.

### Latin text

Misit mihi temeritate solita maledicta sua Calpurnius cognomento Lanarius, quae ad Africam quoque studio eius didici peruenisse. ad quae breuiter ex parte respondi et libelli eius uobis misi exemplaria latius opus, cum opportunum fuerit, primo missurus tempore. in quo illud caui, ne in quoquam existimationem laederem Christianam, sed tantum ut delirantis inperiti mendacium ac uecordiam confutarem. memento mei, sancte ac uenerabilis papa. uide, quantum te diligam, ut ne prouocatus quidem uoluerim respondere nec credam tuum esse, quod in altero forte reprehenderem. frater Communis suppliciter te salutat.

### English translation (Claude)

Calpurnius, surnamed Lanarius, has sent me his abuse with his usual rashness, and I have learned that through his efforts it has reached Africa too. I have answered it briefly in part, and have sent you copies of my little book, intending to send a larger work at the first opportunity, when convenient. In it I have taken care not to injure Christian reputation in anyone, but only to refute the lies and folly of an ignorant madman. Remember me, holy and venerable pope. See how much I love you, that even when provoked I have not wished to answer, nor do I believe that to be yours which I would perhaps censure in another. Brother Communis greets you humbly.

### Translation notes

- 'Calpurnius Lanarius' is Jerome's nickname for Rufinus. 'Pope' (papa) was a title for any bishop.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 68.3 (CSEL 34.2:243; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-68-3).

## Letter 69.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-69-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:243–245
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine praise Maximian, a convert from Donatism, for resigning as bishop of Bagai to avoid dissension in the church.

### Latin text

Molitus est quidem aduersarius Christianorum per carissimum atque dulcissimum filium nostrum fratrem tuum catholicae matri, quae uos in hereditatem Christi ab exheredata praecisione fugientes pio sinu suscepit, periculosissimum scandalum commouere cupiens uidelicet serenitatem gaudii nostri, quae nobis de bono uestrae conuersationis oborta est, foeda innubilare tristitia. sed dominus deus noster misericors et miserator consolans afflictos, nutriens paruulos, curans infirmos ad hoc eum aliquid posse permisit, ut rem correctam multo amplius laetaremur, quam dolebamus afflictam. longe est quippe gloriosius episcopatus sarcinam propter ecclesiae uitanda pericula deposuisse quam propter regenda gubernacula suscepisse. ille quippe se honorem, si pacis ratio pateretur, digne accipere potuisse demonstrat, qui acceptum non defendit indigne. uoluit ergo deus etiam per fratrem tuum filium nostrum Maximianum ostendere inimicis ecclesiae suae esse in uisceribus eius, qui non sua quaerant sed quae Iesu Christi. neque enim illud ministerium dispensationis mysteriorum dei uictus aliqua saeculari cupiditate deseruit, sed pacifica permotus pietate deposuit, ne propter eius honorem foeda et periculosa aut fortasse etiam perniciosa in membris Christi dissensio nasceretur. quid enim esset caecius et omni execratione dignius quam propter ecclesiae catholicae pacem schisma deserere et ipsam pacem catholicam honoris sui quaestione turbare? quid enim laudabilius et Christianae caritati commodatius quam derelicta Donatistarum uesana superbia ita hereditati Christi cohaerere, ut testimonium humilitatis amore probaretur unitatis? itaque, quantum ad ipsum adtinet, sicut eum gaudemus talem inuentum, ut, quod in eius corde diuinus sermo aedificauit, nequaquam tempestas huius temptationis euerteret, sic optamus et deprecamur a domino, ut consequenti uita et moribus suis magis magisque declaret, quam bene gesturus fuisset, quod profecto gereret, si hoc oportuisset. retribuatur ei pax aeterna, quae promissa est ecclesiae, qui intellexit sibi non expedire, quod paci non expediebat ecclesiae.

### English translation (Claude)

The adversary of Christians did indeed try, through our dearest and sweetest son, your brother, to stir up a most dangerous scandal against the Catholic mother, who received you into her loving bosom when you fled from disinherited separation into the inheritance of Christ; he wished, that is, to cloud with foul sadness the serenity of the joy that had arisen in us from the good of your conversion. But the Lord our God, merciful and compassionate, consoling the afflicted, nourishing the little ones, healing the sick, allowed him power for this purpose only, that we might rejoice far more at the matter set right than we grieved at its trouble. For it is far more glorious to have laid down the burden of the episcopate to avoid dangers to the church than to have taken it up to hold the helm. For he shows that he could worthily have accepted the honour, if the principle of peace allowed, who does not unworthily defend it once accepted. God willed, then, through your brother, our son Maximian, to show the enemies of his church that there are in her heart those who seek not their own but the things of Jesus Christ. For he did not abandon that ministry of dispensing the mysteries of God overcome by any worldly desire, but laid it down moved by peaceable piety, lest because of his rank a foul and dangerous, or perhaps even destructive, dissension should arise among the members of Christ. For what would be blinder and more deserving of all execration than to leave a schism for the sake of the peace of the Catholic Church, and then to disturb that very Catholic peace by a question about one's own rank? And what more praiseworthy and more befitting Christian love than, having abandoned the mad pride of the Donatists, to cleave to the inheritance of Christ in such a way that a testimony of humility is shown by love of unity? So, as far as he is concerned, just as we rejoice that he has been found such that the storm of this temptation by no means overthrew what the divine word had built in his heart, so we wish and pray the Lord that by his subsequent life and conduct he may show more and more how well he would have exercised what he certainly would exercise, if it had been right. May he be repaid with the eternal peace promised to the church, who understood that what was not expedient for the peace of the church was not expedient for him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 103:8 (102:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Castorius, from Alypius and Augustine; brother of Maximian, a converted Donatist bishop of Bagai. Allusions to Ps 103:8 (102:8 LXX/Vulg.); 1 Cor 4:1; Phil 2:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 69.1 (CSEL 34.2:243–245; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-69-1).

## Letter 69.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-69-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:245–246
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Castorius to accept election as bishop of Bagai in his brother's place and dedicate his gifts to Christ.

### Latin text

Tu uero, fili carissime, non mediocre gaudium nostrum, qui nulla tali necessitate a suscipiendo episcopatu impediris, decet indolem tuam Christo in te dicare, quod dedit. ingenium quippe tuum, prudentia, eloquentia, grauitas, sobrietas et cetera, quibus ornantur mores tui, dona sunt dei. cui melius seruiunt quam illi, a quo tributa sunt, ut et custodiantur et augeantur et perficiantur et remunerentur? non seruiant huic saeculo, ne uanescant cum illo atque dispereant. non diu tecum in hoc agendum nouimus, quanta facilitate consideres spes inanium hominum et insatiabiles cupiditates et incertam uitam. abice igitur ex animo, quicquid terrenae atque falsae felicitatis expectatione conceperat; operare in agro dei, ubi certus est fructus, ubi tam multa tanto ante promissa completa sunt, ut ea, quae restant, insanissime desperentur. obsecramus te per Christi diuinitatem et humanitatem, per pacem caelestis illius ciuitatis, unde peregrinantes labore temporali aeternam requiem comparamus, ut in episcopatum Bagaiensis ecclesiae fratri tuo non ignominiose cadenti sed gloriose cedenti succedas. plebs illa, cui per tuam mentem ac linguam donis dei fecundatam et ornatam uberrima incrementa speramus, in te intellegat fratrem tuum non pro sua desidia sed pro eius pace fecisse, quod fecit. haec epistula mandauimus ut tibi non legeretur, nisi cum te iam tenerent, quibus es necessarius. nos enim te spiritalis amoris uinculo tenemus, quia et nostro collegio multum es necessarius. cur autem etiam corporalem praesentiam non exhibuerimus, postea scies.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, dearest son, no small joy of ours, who are hindered from accepting the episcopate by no such necessity: it befits your character to dedicate to Christ what he has given you. For your talent, prudence, eloquence, seriousness, sobriety, and the other things that adorn your character are gifts of God. Whom do they serve better than him by whom they were bestowed, so that they may be kept, increased, perfected, and rewarded? Let them not serve this world, lest they vanish and perish with it. We know there is no need to argue long with you on this, with how much ease you consider the hopes of vain men, their insatiable desires, and their uncertain life. Cast out of your mind, then, whatever it had conceived in expectation of earthly and false happiness; work in the field of God, where the fruit is sure, where so many things promised so long before have been fulfilled that it is utter madness to despair of what remains. We beseech you, by the divinity and humanity of Christ, by the peace of that heavenly city from which, as pilgrims, we gain eternal rest by temporal labour, to succeed in the episcopate of the church of Bagai your brother, who did not fall disgracefully but withdrew gloriously. Let that people, for whom we hope for the richest increase through your mind and tongue, made fruitful and adorned by the gifts of God, understand in you that your brother did what he did not from his own sloth but for its peace. We ordered that this letter should not be read to you until those to whom you are needed already had hold of you. For we hold you by the bond of spiritual love, because you are much needed in our college too. Why we have not also been present in body, you will learn later.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 69.2 (CSEL 34.2:245–246; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-69-2).

## Letter 70.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-70-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:246–247
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine argue to Naucelio that the Donatists' condemnation and later restoration of Felicianus shows they could condemn the innocent, as they did Caecilian.

### Latin text

Cum rettulisses nobis, quid ab episcopo uestro Clarentio responsum fuerit, id est de Feliciano Mustitano, non eum negasse et damnatum ab ipsis et postea in honore suo receptum sed innocentem fuisse damnatum, quia absens fuerit et absentem se fuisse probauerit, hoc dicimus, ut ad hoc respondeat, quia non licuit damnari inauditum, quem innocentem fuisse ipsi modo dicunt, qui eum damnauerunt. aut ergo innocens damnari non debuit aut nocens recipi non debuit. si innocens receptus est, innocens damnatus est; si nocens damnatus est, nocens receptus est. si nesciebant, qui damnauerunt, utrum innocens fuerit, arguendi sunt temeritatis, quia inauditum innocentem, de quo nesciebant, damnare ausi sunt, et de praesenti facto intellegimus eadem temeritate illos damnasse etiam superiores, quos traditionis crimine infamauerunt. si enim potuit ab ipsis innocens damnari, potuerunt ab ipsis traditores etiam dici, qui non erant traditores.

### English translation (Claude)

Since you reported to us what answer your bishop Clarentius gave concerning Felicianus of Musti, namely that he did not deny that he was both condemned by them and afterwards received back in his rank, but said that he had been condemned when innocent, because he was absent and proved that he had been absent, we say this, so that he may answer it: since it was not lawful to condemn unheard one whom those who condemned him now themselves say was innocent, either he should not have been condemned if innocent, or he should not have been received back if guilty. If he was received back innocent, he was condemned innocent; if he was condemned guilty, he was received back guilty. If those who condemned him did not know whether he was innocent, they are to be convicted of rashness, because they dared to condemn an innocent man unheard about whom they did not know; and from the present case we understand that with the same rashness they also condemned those earlier men whom they defamed with the crime of handing over. For if an innocent man could be condemned by them, men who were not traitors could also be called traitors by them.

### Translation notes

- To Naucelio, from Alypius and Augustine. The Latin of the central sentences is scrambled in the digital text (lines transposed); restored by a logged correction. NPNF leaves this letter untranslated; checked against the Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 70.1 (CSEL 34.2:246–247; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-70-1).

## Letter 70.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-70-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:247–248
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine presses the dilemma that the Donatists accepted without rebaptism those Felicianus baptized in schism, yet reject the baptism of the whole world.

### Latin text

Deinde idem Felicianus damnatus ab ipsis multo tempore cum Maximiano communicauit. si innocens erat, quando damnatus est, quare posteriore tempore cum scelerato Maximiano communicans multos baptizauit extra communionem ipsorum? testes sunt ipsi, qui egerunt apud proconsulem, ut idem Felicianus tamquam cum Maximiano de basilica excluderetur. parum erat ergo damnasse absentem, damnasse inauditum, damnasse, sicut dicunt, innocentem; insuper et aditus est contra illum proconsul, ut de ecclesia expelleretur. uel tunc, quando illum expellebant de ecclesia, fatentur, quia inter damnatos et sceleratos et Maximianistas eum deputauerunt; quando ergo ille baptizabat homines, Maximiano communicans uerum baptismum dabat an falsum? si uerum baptismum dabat, qui cum Maximiano communicabat, quare accusatur baptismus orbis terrarum? si autem falsum baptismum dabat, quando cum Maximiano communicabat, quare sic sunt recepti cum illo, quos in schismate Maximiani baptizauit, et nemo eos in parte uestra rebaptizauit?

### English translation (Claude)

Then, the same Felicianus, condemned by them, was in communion with Maximian for a long time. If he was innocent when he was condemned, why at a later time, in communion with the criminal Maximian, did he baptize many outside their communion? Witnesses are those very men who took action before the proconsul to have the same Felicianus excluded from his basilica as one in communion with Maximian. So it was not enough to have condemned him absent, condemned him unheard, condemned him, as they say, innocent; on top of that the proconsul was approached against him to have him expelled from the church. At least then, when they were expelling him from the church, they admit that they counted him among the condemned, the criminals, and the Maximianists. When, then, he was baptizing people while in communion with Maximian, did he give true baptism or false? If he who was in communion with Maximian gave true baptism, why is the baptism of the whole world accused? But if he gave false baptism while in communion with Maximian, why were those whom he baptized in the schism of Maximian received with him in such a way that no one in your party rebaptized them?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 70.2 (CSEL 34.2:247–248; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-70-2).

## Letter 71.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:248–249
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends to Jerome the deacon Cyprian, bearer of the letter, as a reliable carrier of a reply.

### Latin text

Ex quo coepi ad te scribere ac tua scripta desiderare, numquam mihi melior occurrit occasio, quam ut per dei seruum ac ministrum fidelissimum mihique carissimum mea tibi adferretur epistula, qualis est filius noster Cyprianus diaconus, per hunc certe ita spero litteras tuas, ut certius in hoc rerum genere quicquam sperare non possim. nam nec studium in petendis rescriptis memorato filio nostro deerit nec gratia in promerendis nec diligentia in custodiendis nec alacritas in perferendis nec fides in reddendis. tantum, si aliquo modo mereor, adiuuet dominus et adsit cordi tuo et desiderio meo, ut fraternam uoluntatem nulla uoluntas maior impediat.

### English translation (Claude)

Since I began to write to you and to long for your writings, no better opportunity has ever come my way than that my letter should be brought to you by a servant and most faithful minister of God, very dear to me, such as is our son Cyprian the deacon. Through him I hope for your letter with such confidence that I could not hope for anything of this kind more surely. For our said son will not lack zeal in asking for a reply, nor favour in obtaining it, nor care in keeping it, nor eagerness in carrying it, nor faithfulness in delivering it. Only, if I am in any way worthy, may the Lord help and be present to your heart and to my desire, so that no greater will may hinder a brotherly will.

### Translation notes

- Letter from Augustine to Jerome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 71.1 (CSEL 34.2:248–249; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-1).

## Letter 71.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:249–250
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine resends his earlier letters to Jerome, including the first one written while he was a presbyter, which Profuturus never carried.

### Latin text

Quia ergo duas iam epistulas misi, nullam autem tuam postea recepi, easdem ipsas rursus mittere uolui credens eas non peruenisse. quod si et peruenerunt ac fortasse tuae potius ad me peruenire minime potuerunt, ea ipsa scripta, quae iam misisti, iterum mitte, si forte seruata sunt; sin minus, rursus dicta, quod legam, dum tamen his respondere ne graueris, quod iam diu est ut expecto. primas etiam quas ad te adhuc presbyter litteras praeparaueram mittendas per quendam fratrem nostrum Profuturum, qui postea collega nobis factus iam ex hac uita migrauit nec eas tunc ipse perferre potuit, quia continuo, dum proficisci disponit, episcopatus sarcina detentus ac deinde breui defunctus est, etiam nunc mittere uolui, ut scias, in tua conloquia quam olim inardescam et quam uim patiar, quod a me tam longe absunt sensus corporis tui, per quos adire possit ad animum tuum animus meus, mi frater dulcissime et in domini membris honorande.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, I have already sent two letters and have received none of yours since, I wished to send those same letters again, believing that they had not arrived. And if they did arrive, and perhaps yours could not reach me, send again the very letters you have already sent, if they have been kept; if not, dictate again something for me to read, provided you are not unwilling to answer these, which I have long been waiting for. The first letter too, which I had prepared for you while still a presbyter, to be sent through a brother of ours, Profuturus, who afterwards became our colleague and has now departed this life, and who could not carry it then, because just as he was arranging to set out he was detained by the burden of the episcopate and then died shortly after, I wished to send even now, so that you may know how long I have burned for conversation with you, and how much I suffer because the senses of your body, through which my mind might approach your mind, are so far from me, my sweetest brother, to be honoured among the members of the Lord.

### Translation notes

- The earlier letters are Letters 28 and 40; the first is Letter 28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 71.2 (CSEL 34.2:249–250; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-2).

## Letter 71.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:250–252
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome why his new translation of Job from the Hebrew seems less exact than his earlier one from the Greek, marked with asterisks and obelisks.

### Latin text

In hac autem epistula hoc addo, quod postea didicimus, Iob ex Hebraeo te interpretatum, cum iam quandam haberemus interpretationem tuam eius prophetae ex Graeco eloquio uersam in Latinum, ubi tamen asteriscis notasti, quae in Hebraeo sunt et Graeco desunt, obeliscis autem, quae in Graeco inueniuntur et in Hebraeo non sunt, tam mirabili diligentia, ut quibusdam in locis ad uerba singula stellas significantes uideamus eadem uerba esse in Hebraeo, in Graeco autem non esse. porro in hac posteriore interpretatione, quae uersa est ex Hebraeo, non eadem uerborum fides occurrit nec parum turbat cogitantem, uel cur in illa prima tanta diligentia figantur asterisci, ut minimas etiam particulas orationis indicent deesse codicibus Graecis, quae sunt in Hebraeis, uel cur in hac altera, quae ex Hebraeis est, neglegentius hoc curatum sit, ut hae eaedem particulae locis suis inuenirentur. aliquid inde exempli gratia ponere uolui, sed mihi ad horam codex defuit, qui ex Hebraeo est. uerum tamen, quia praeuolas ingenio, non solum quid dixerim, uerum etiam quid dicere uoluerim, satis, ut opinor, intellegis, ut causa reddita, quod mouet, edisseras.

### English translation (Claude)

In this letter I add what we have learned since: that you have translated Job from the Hebrew, though we already had a translation of yours of that prophet turned from the Greek into Latin, in which you marked with asterisks what is in the Hebrew and missing in the Greek, and with obelisks what is found in the Greek and is not in the Hebrew, with such wonderful care that in some places we see stars against single words, signifying that those words are in the Hebrew but not in the Greek. But in this later translation, which is turned from the Hebrew, the same fidelity to the words does not appear; and it greatly troubles one who reflects, either why in that first one the asterisks are fixed with such care that they show even the smallest particles of speech missing from the Greek manuscripts that are in the Hebrew, or why in this other, which is from the Hebrew, less care has been taken that those same particles should be found in their places. I wished to give an example from it, but at the time I did not have the manuscript translated from the Hebrew. However, since you fly ahead in talent, you understand well enough, I think, not only what I have said but also what I meant to say, so that you may give the reason and explain what troubles me.

### Translation notes

- Augustine calls Job a prophet.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 71.3 (CSEL 34.2:250–252; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-3).

## Letter 71.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:252–253
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Jerome to translate the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew, fearing that a version from the Hebrew will divide Latin from Greek churches.

### Latin text

Ego sane mallem Graecas potius canonicas te nobis interpretari scripturas, quae septuaginta interpretum perhibentur. perdurum erit enim, si tua interpretatio per multas ecclesias frequentius coeperit lectitari, quod a Graecis ecclesiis Latinae ecclesiae dissonabunt, maxime quia facile contradictor conuincitur Graeco prolato libro, id est linguae notissimae. quisquis autem in eo, quod ex Hebraeo translatum est, aliquo insolito permotus fuerit et falsi crimen intenderit, uix aut numquam ad Hebraea testimonia peruenitur, quibus defendatur obiectum. quod si etiam peruentum fuerit, tot Latinas et Graecas auctoritates damnari quis ferat? huc accedit, quia etiam consulti Hebraei possunt aliud respondere, ut tu solus necessarius uidearis, qui etiam ipsos possis conuincere, sed tamen quo iudice, mirum si potueris inuenire.

### English translation (Claude)

I for my part would rather you translated for us the Greek canonical Scriptures which are said to be of the Seventy translators. For it will be very hard if your translation begins to be read more often in many churches, because the Latin churches will differ from the Greek churches; especially since an objector is easily refuted by producing the Greek book, that is, of a very well-known language. But if anyone is disturbed by something unusual in what has been translated from the Hebrew and brings a charge of falsification, one can hardly or never get to the Hebrew testimonies by which what is objected may be defended. And even if one does get to them, who would tolerate so many Latin and Greek authorities being condemned? Besides, even Jews when consulted may give a different answer, so that you alone would seem necessary, who could refute even them; but before what judge, it would be a wonder if you could find one.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 71.4 (CSEL 34.2:252–253; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-4).

## Letter 71.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:253–255
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports a riot at Oea over Jerome's rendering in Jonah, praises his revision of the Gospels from the Greek, and asks him to translate the Septuagint.

### Latin text

Nam quidam frater noster episcopus cum lectitari instituisset in ecclesia, cui praeest, interpretationem tuam, mouit quiddam longe aliter abs te positum apud Ionam prophetam, quam erat omnium sensibus memoriaeque inueteratum et tot aetatum successionibus decantatum. factus est tantus tumultus in plebe maxime Graecis arguentibus et inflammantibus calumniam falsitatis, ut cogeretur episcopus — Oea quippe ciuitas erat — Iudaeorum testimonium flagitare. utrum autem illi inperitia an malitia hoc esse in Hebraeis codicibus responderunt, quod et Graeci et Latini habebant atque dicebant? quid plura? coactus est homo uelut mendositatem corrigere nolens post magnum periculum non remanere sine plebe unde etiam nobis uidetur aliquando te quoque in nonnullis falli potuisse et uide, hoc quale sit in eis litteris, quae non possunt conlatis usitatarum linguarum testimoniis emendari. Proinde non paruas deo gratias agimus de opere tuo, quod euangelium ex Graeco interpretatus es, quia et paene in omnibus nulla offensio est, cum scripturam Graecam contulerimus. unde si quisquam ueteri falsitati contentiosus fauet, prolatis conlatisque codicibus uel docetur facillime uel refellitur. et si quaedam rarissima merito mouent, quis tam durus est, qui labori tam utili non facile ignoscat, cui uicem laudis referre non sufficit? quid tibi autem uideatur, cur in multis aliter se habeat Hebraeorum codicum auctoritas, aliter Graecorum quae dicitur septuaginta, uellem dignareris aperire. neque enim paruum pondus habet illa, quae sic meruit diffamari et qua usos apostolos non solum res ipsa indicat, sed etiam te adtestatum esse memini. ac per hoc plurimum profueris, si eam scripturam Graecam, quam septuaginta operati sunt, Latinae ueritati reddideris, quae in diuersis codicibus ita uaria est, ut tolerari uix possit, et ita suspecta, ne in Graeco aliud inueniatur, ut inde aliquid proferre aut probare dubitemus. breuem putabam futuram hanc epistulam, sed nescio quo modo ita mihi dulce factum est in ea progredi, ac si tecum loquerer. sed obsecro te per dominum, ne te pigeat ad omnia respondere et praestare mihi, quantum potueris, praesentiam tuam.

### English translation (Claude)

For a certain brother of ours, a bishop, when he had arranged for your translation to be read in the church over which he presides, stirred things up by something in the prophet Jonah that you rendered very differently from what was ingrained in everyone's senses and memory and had been chanted for so many successive generations. Such a tumult arose among the people, especially as the Greeks argued and inflamed the charge of falsification, that the bishop (the city was Oea) was compelled to ask for the testimony of the Jews. And they, whether out of ignorance or malice, answered that what the Greeks and Latins had and said was in the Hebrew manuscripts. Why say more? The man was compelled to correct what seemed a mistake, not wishing, after great danger, to be left without a people. From this it seems to us too that you also could sometimes be mistaken in some things; and see what this means in writings that cannot be corrected by comparing the testimonies of languages in common use. Accordingly, we give no small thanks to God for your work in translating the gospel from the Greek, because in almost everything there is no difficulty when we have compared the Greek Scripture. So if anyone contentiously favours an old error, he is very easily either taught or refuted when the manuscripts are produced and compared. And if some very rare things rightly cause difficulty, who is so hard as not readily to pardon so useful a labour, which cannot be repaid enough with praise? But I wish you would be good enough to explain what you think is the reason why in many places the authority of the Hebrew manuscripts is one thing and that of the Greek, called the Seventy, another. For that version has no small weight, which has deserved to be so widely spread, and which not only the thing itself shows that the apostles used, but which I remember you also testified that they used. And so you would do very great service if you rendered into accurate Latin that Greek Scripture which the Seventy produced, which in different manuscripts varies so much that it can hardly be tolerated, and is so suspect, lest something else be found in the Greek, that we hesitate to quote or prove anything from it. I thought this letter would be short, but somehow it has become so sweet to me to go on with it as if I were talking with you. But I beseech you by the Lord not to be reluctant to answer everything, and to give me your presence as far as you can.

### Scripture references

- Jonah 4:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The dispute at Oea concerned the plant in Jonah 4:6 (Jerome's 'ivy' for the traditional 'gourd'). The digital text lacks a full stop after 'plebe'; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 71.5 (CSEL 34.2:253–255; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-71-5).

## Letter 72.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:255–256
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome tells Augustine he cannot understand how the letter addressed to him circulates in Rome and Italy but never reached him.

### Latin text

Crebras ad me epistulas dirigis et saepe compellis, ut respondeam cuidam epistulae tuae, cuius ad me, ut ante iam scripsi, per Sisinnium diaconum exemplaria peruenerunt absque subscriptione tua et quae primum per fratrem Profuturum, secundo per quendam alium te misisse significas; et interim Profuturum retractum de itinere et episcopum constitutum ueloci morte subtractum, illum, cuius nomen retices, maris timuisse discrimina et nauigationis mutasse consilium. quae cum ita sint, satis mirari nequeo, quo modo ipsa epistula et Romae et in Italia haberi a plerisque dicatur et ad me solum non peruenerit, cui soli missa est, praesertim cum idem frater Sisinnius inter ceteros tractatus tuos dixerit eam se non in Africa, non apud te, sed in insula Hadriae ante hoc ferme quinquennium repperisse.

### English translation (Claude)

You send me frequent letters and often press me to answer a certain letter of yours, copies of which reached me, as I wrote before, through Sisinnius the deacon, without your signature; a letter which you indicate you sent first through brother Profuturus and a second time through someone else; and that meanwhile Profuturus was called back from his journey, made bishop, and taken away by a swift death, while the other, whose name you do not mention, feared the dangers of the sea and changed his plan of sailing. This being so, I cannot wonder enough how that same letter is said to be held by many both in Rome and in Italy, and has not reached me alone, to whom alone it was sent; especially since that same brother Sisinnius said that he found it, among your other treatises, not in Africa, not with you, but on an island of the Adriatic about five years ago.

### Translation notes

- Letter from Jerome to Augustine. The letter in question is Letter 40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 72.1 (CSEL 34.2:255–256; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-1).

## Letter 72.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:256–257
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome explains that friends suspected Augustine of seeking fame by attacking him, and that he had not replied because he doubted the letter was genuine.

### Latin text

De amicitia omnis tollenda suspicio est et sic cum amico quasi cum altero se loquendum. nonnulli familiares mei et uasa Christi, quorum Hierosolymis et in sanctis locis permagna copia est, suggerebant non simplici a te animo factum sed laudem atque rumusculos et gloriolam populi requirente, ut de nobis cresceres, ut multi cognoscerent te prouocare, me timere, te scribere ut doctum, me tacere ut inperitum et tandem repperisse, qui garrulitati meae modum inponeret. ego autem, ut simpliciter fatear, dignationi tuae primum idcirco respondere nolui, quia tuam liquido epistulam non credebam nec, ut uulgi de quibusdam prouerbium est, litum melle gladium; deinde illud cauebam, ne episcopo communionis meae uiderer procaciter respondere et aliqua in reprehendentis epistula reprehendere, praesertim cum quaedam in illa haeretica iudicarem;

### English translation (Claude)

From friendship all suspicion must be removed, and one should speak with a friend as with another self. Some of my intimate friends and vessels of Christ, of whom there is a very great number at Jerusalem and in the holy places, suggested that this was not done by you with a single mind, but in search of praise and petty rumours and the small glory of popular favour, so that you might grow at my expense; that many might know that you challenge and I fear, that you write as a learned man and I keep silent as an ignorant one, and that at last someone had been found to put a limit to my chatter. But I, to confess it simply, did not wish at first to answer your Worthiness, because I did not clearly believe it to be your letter, nor, as the common proverb says of some, a sword smeared with honey; and then I was wary of seeming to answer a bishop of my communion impudently and to censure some things in the letter of one who was censuring me, especially since I judged certain things in it to be heretical;

### Translation notes

- The sentence continues in 72.3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 72.2 (CSEL 34.2:256–257; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-2).

## Letter 72.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:257–259
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome asks Augustine either to send a signed copy or to stop provoking an old man, quoting Virgil and the example of Barzillai.

### Latin text

ad extremum, ne tu iure expostulares et diceres: Quid enim? epistulam meam uideras et notae tibi manus in subscriptione signa deprehenderas, ut tam facile amicum laederes et alterius malitiam in meam uerteres contumeliam? igitur, ut ante iam scripsi, aut mitte eandem epistulam tua subscriptam manu aut senem latitantem in cellula lacessere desine. sin autem tuam uis uel ostentare uel exercere doctrinam, quaere iuuenes et disertos et nobiles, quorum Romae dicuntur esse quam plurimi, qui possint et audeant tecum congredi et in disputatione sanctarum scripturarum iugum cum episcopo ducere. ego quondam miles nunc ueteranus et tuas et aliorum debeo laudare uictorias, non ipse rursus effeto corpore dimicare, ne, si me ad scribendum frequenter inpuleris, illius recorder historiae, quod Hannibalem iuueniliter exultantem Quintus Maximus patientia sua fregerit. Omnia fert aetas, animum quoque. saepe ego longos cantando puerum memini me condere soles. nunc oblita mihi tot carmina; uox quoque Moerim iam fugit. et, ut magis de scripturis sanctis loquar, Berzelli ille Galaadites regis Dauid beneficia omnesque delicias iuueni delegans filio ostendit senectutem haec appetere non debere nec oblata suscipere.

### English translation (Claude)

and finally, lest you should justly complain and say: 'What? Had you seen my letter and recognized the marks of a familiar hand in the signature, that you so easily wounded a friend and turned another's malice into an insult to me?' Therefore, as I wrote before, either send that same letter signed with your own hand, or stop provoking an old man hiding in his cell. But if you wish either to display or to exercise your learning, look for young, eloquent, and noble men, of whom there are said to be very many at Rome, who can and dare to engage with you and bear the yoke with a bishop in the debate over the holy Scriptures. I, once a soldier, now a veteran, ought to praise the victories of you and others, not myself fight again with a worn-out body; lest, if you often drive me to write, I recall that story of how Quintus Maximus by his patience broke Hannibal in his youthful exultation. 'Age bears all away, the mind too. Often, I remember, as a boy I spent long days in song; now so many songs are forgotten by me; even his voice has now fled Moeris.' And, to speak rather from the holy Scriptures, Barzillai the Gileadite, handing over to his young son King David's favours and all his delights, showed that old age ought not to seek these things nor accept them when offered.

### Scripture references

- 2 Sam 19:35: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 19:37: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Ecl. 9.51–54 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Fabius Maximus 'Cunctator' and Hannibal. Quotation of Virgil, Eclogues 9.51–54. Allusion to 2 Sam 19:31–39 (Barzillai), where the son is named Chimham.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 72.3 (CSEL 34.2:257–259; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-3).

## Letter 72.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:259–261
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome tells Augustine to either disown the letter or admit it, so that any reply in self-defence will be Augustine's fault.

### Latin text

Quod autem iuras te aduersum me librum non scripsisse neque Romam misisse, quem non scripseris, sed si forte aliqua in tuis scriptis reperiantur, quae a meo sensu discrepent, non me a te laesum, sed a te scriptum, quod tibi rectum uidebatur, quaeso, ut me patienter audias. non scripsisti librum. et quo modo mihi reprehensionis a te meae per alios scripta delata sunt? cur habet Italia, quod tu non scripsisti? qua ratione poscis, ut rescribam ad ea, quae scripsisse te denegas? nec tam hebes sum, ut, si diuersa senseris, me laesum putem. sed si mea comminus dicta reprehendas et rationem scriptorum expetas et, quae scripserim, emendare compellas et ad παλινῳδίαν prouoces et oculos mihi reddas, in hoc laeditur amicitia, in hoc necessitudinis iura uiolantur. ne uideamur certare pueriliter et fautoribus inuicem uel detractoribus nostris tribuere materiam contendendi, haec scribo, quia te pure et Christiane diligere cupio nec quicquam in mea mente retinere, quod distet a labiis. non enim conuenit, ut ab adulescentia usque ad hanc aetatem in monasteriolo cum sanctis fratribus labore desudans aliquid contra episcopum communionis meae scribere audeam et eum episcopum, quem ante coepi amare quam nosse, qui me primus ad amicitias prouocauit, quem post me orientem in scripturarum eruditione laetatus sum. igitur aut tuum negato librum, si forte non tuus est, et desine flagitare rescriptum ad ea, quae non scripsisti, aut, si tuus est, ingenue confitere, ut, si in defensione mei aliqua scripsero, in te culpa sit, qui prouocasti, non in me, qui respondere compulsus sum.

### English translation (Claude)

As for your swearing that you did not write a book against me nor send to Rome one you had not written, but that if perhaps some things are found in your writings which differ from my opinion, I have not been wounded by you, but you have written what seemed right to you: I ask you to hear me patiently. You did not write a book. How, then, have writings containing your censure of me been brought to me by others? Why does Italy have what you did not write? On what ground do you ask me to reply to what you deny having written? Nor am I so dull as to think myself wounded if you hold different opinions. But if you censure my sayings at close quarters, demand an account of what I have written, press me to correct what I have written, challenge me to a palinode, and give me back my eyes, in this friendship is wounded, in this the rights of close ties are violated. I write this so that we may not seem to contend childishly and give our supporters or detractors material for quarrelling with one another, because I wish to love you purely and as a Christian, and to keep nothing in my mind that differs from my lips. For it is not fitting that I, who from youth to this age have toiled and sweated in a little monastery with holy brothers, should dare to write anything against a bishop of my communion, and that bishop whom I began to love before I knew him, who first invited me to friendship, whom I rejoiced to see rising after me in the learning of the Scriptures. Therefore either deny that the book is yours, if perhaps it is not, and stop demanding a reply to what you did not write; or, if it is yours, confess it frankly, so that, if I write anything in my own defence, the fault may be yours, who provoked me, not mine, who was compelled to answer.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Stesichorus (Stesichorus): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Give me back my eyes' refers again to the story of Stesichorus (cf. 40.7). The Greek word and 'prouoces' are restored from misread letters in the digital text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 72.4 (CSEL 34.2:259–261; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-4).

## Letter 72.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:261–263
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome accuses Augustine of provoking an old man, hints that his commentaries on the Psalms differ from the Greek interpreters, and asks that future letters come to him first.

### Latin text

Addis praeterea te paratum esse, ut, si quid me in tuis scriptis mouerit aut corrigere uoluero, fraterne accipias et non solum mea in te beniuolentia gauisurum, sed, ut hoc ipsum faciam, deprecans. rursum dico, quod sentio: prouocas senem, tacentem stimulas, uideris iactare doctrinam. non est autem aetatis meae putari maliuolum erga eum, cui magis fauere debeo. et si in euangeliis ac prophetis peruersi homines inueniunt, quod nitantur reprehendere, miraris, si in tuis libris et maxime in scripturarum expositione, quae uel obscurissimae sunt, quaedam a recti linea discrepare uideantur? et hoc dico, non quod in operibus tuis quaedam reprehendenda iam censeam. neque enim lectioni eorum umquam operam dedi nec horum exemplariorum apud nos copia est praeter Soliloquiorum tuorum libros et quosdam commentariolos in psalmos, quos si uellem discutere, non dicam a me, qui nihil sum, sed a ueterum Graecorum docerem interpretationibus discrepare. uale, mi amice carissime, aetate fili, dignitate parens, et hoc a me rogatus obserua, ut, quicquid mihi scripseris, ad me primum facias peruenire.

### English translation (Claude)

You add, moreover, that you are ready, if anything in your writings troubles me or I wish to correct it, to receive it in a brotherly way, and that you will not only rejoice in my goodwill towards you but even beg me to do this very thing. Again I say what I think: you provoke an old man, you goad one who is silent, you seem to show off your learning. But it does not befit my age to be thought ill-disposed towards one whom I ought rather to favour. And if perverse men find in the Gospels and the Prophets what they strive to censure, do you wonder if in your books, and especially in the exposition of the Scriptures, which are very obscure, some things seem to depart from the straight line? I say this not because I already judge that certain things in your works should be censured. For I have never given attention to reading them, nor do we have a supply of copies of them here, except your books of the Soliloquies and some short commentaries on the Psalms; if I wished to discuss these, I would show that they differ, I will not say from me, who am nothing, but from the interpretations of the ancient Greeks. Farewell, my dearest friend, my son in age, my father in rank; and, as I ask of you, see to it that whatever you write to me reaches me first.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 72.5 (CSEL 34.2:261–263; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/68-1/#p-72-5).

## Letter 73.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:263–265
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Jerome’s complaint about the copies of his letter that had reached Jerome, asking how they can discuss Scripture without rancour if Jerome means to wound him.

### Latin text

Quamuis existimem, antequam istas sumeres, uenisse in manus tuas litteras meas, quas per dei seruum filium nostrum Cyprianum diaconum misi, quibus certissime agnosceres meam esse epistulam, cuius exemplaria illuc peruenisse commemorasti, unde iam me arbitror rescriptis tuis uelut Entellinis grandibus atque acribus caestibus tamquam audacem Dareta coepisse pulsari atque uersari, nunc tamen eis ipsis respondeo litteris tuis, quas mihi per sanctum filium nostrum Asterium mittere dignatus es, in quibus multa in me comperi tuae beniuolentissimae caritatis et rursus quaedam nonnullius a me tuae offensionis indicia. itaque ubi mulcebar legens, ibi continuo feriebar hoc sane uel maxime admirans. quod, cum te dicas exemplaribus litterarum mearum ideo temere non putasse credendum, ne forte te respondente laesus iuste expostularem, quod probare ante debuisses meum esse sermonem et sic rescribere, postea iubeas, si mea est epistula, aperte me scribere aut mittere exemplaria ueriora, ut absque ullo rancore stomachi in scripturarum disputatione uersemur. quo pacto enim possumus in hac disputatione sine rancore uersari, si me laedere paras? aut si non paras, quo modo ego te non laedente abs te laesus iuste expostularem, quod probare ante debuisses meum esse sermonem et sic rescribere. hoc est et sic laedere? nisi enim rescribendo laesisses, ego iuste expostulare non possem. proinde cum ita rescribis, ut laedas, quis locus nobis relinquitur in disputatione scripturarum sine ullo rancore uersandi? ego quidem absit ut laedar, si mihi certa ratione uolueris et potueris demonstrare illud ex epistula apostoli uel quid aliud scripturarum sanctarum te uerius intellexisse quam me. immo uero absit, ut non cum gratiarum actione lucris meis deputem, si fuero te docente instructus aut emendante correctus.

### English translation (Claude)

Although I suppose that, before you received this, my letter reached your hands, the one I sent by the servant of God, our son the deacon Cyprian, from which you would learn with full certainty that the letter of which you said copies had reached you is mine (and so I think that I, like the bold Dares, have already begun to be struck and tossed about by your replies as by the great and fierce gauntlets of Entellus), I nevertheless now answer the very letter which you were pleased to send me by our holy son Asterius. In it I found many signs of your most kindly love towards me, and again some signs that you have taken some offence at me. And so, where I was soothed as I read, there at once I was struck; and what I wondered at most of all was this: you say that you did not think the copies of my letter should be rashly believed, for fear that, if you answered, I might justly complain of being injured, because you ought first to have established that the words were mine and only then reply; and yet you go on to bid me, if the letter is mine, to write plainly or to send truer copies, so that we may engage in the discussion of the Scriptures without any rancour of feeling. But how can we engage in this discussion without rancour if you are preparing to injure me? Or, if you are not preparing to, how could I, when you were not injuring me, justly complain of being injured by you, because you ought first to have established that the words were mine and only then reply, that is, only then injure? For unless you had injured me by replying, I could not justly complain. Therefore, when you reply in such a way as to injure, what room is left us for engaging in the discussion of the Scriptures without any rancour? For my part, far be it from me to be injured if you are willing and able to show me by sound reasoning that you have understood that passage of the apostle’s letter, or anything else in the holy Scriptures, more truly than I. Nay rather, far be it from me not to count it as gain, with thanksgiving, if I am instructed by your teaching or set right by your correction.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 5.362–484 (Virgil): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Entellus and Dares are the boxers of Virgil, Aeneid 5.362–484; Jerome had used the image. The ‘passage of the apostle’s letter’ is Gal 2:11–14, the subject of the dispute. Augustine quotes Jerome’s own words from Ep. 72 (Goldbacher’s numbering).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.1 (CSEL 34.2:263–265; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-1).

## Letter 73.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:265
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Jerome would not have expected him to feel hurt unless Jerome himself felt hurt by Augustine’s letter.

### Latin text

Verum tamen tu, mi frater carissime, nisi te putares laesum scriptis meis, non me putares laedi posse rescriptis tuis. nullo enim modo id de te opinatus fuero, quod non te arbitrans laesum sic tamen rescribis, ut laedas. aut si te non sic rescribente ego propter nimiam stultitiam meam laedi posse putatus sum, hoc ipso laesisti plane, quod de me ita sensisti. sed nullo modo tu me, quem numquam talem expertus es, temere talem crederes, qui litterarum mearum exemplaribus, etiam cum stilum meum nosses, temere credere noluisti. si enim non inmerito uidisti me iuste expostulaturum fuisse, si temere crederes esse litteras meas, quae non essent meae, quanto iustius expostularem me ipsum temere putatum talem, qualem me non nosset, qui putauisset? nequaquam ergo ita prolabereris, ut te non rescribente, quo laederer, me tamen existimares nimis insipientem etiam tali tuo rescripto laedi potuisse.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet you, my dearest brother, would not think that I could be injured by your reply unless you thought that you had been injured by my writings. For I could in no way have formed such an opinion of you, that you, not thinking yourself injured, should still reply in such a way as to injure. Or, if you did not so reply, and I was thought, through my great folly, capable of being injured, then you have plainly injured me by that very thing, by thinking so of me. But you would by no means rashly believe me to be such a man, never having found me so, you who would not rashly believe the copies of my letter even though you knew my style. For if you saw, not without reason, that I would justly complain if you rashly believed a letter to be mine that was not mine, how much more justly would I complain at being rashly thought to be such a man as the one who thought so did not know me to be? You would never, then, have slipped so far as to think me so very foolish that I could be injured even by such a reply of yours, when you were not replying in order to injure me.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.2 (CSEL 34.2:265; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-2).

## Letter 73.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:265–267
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome’s pardon for any injury his letter caused and begs him to point out his real errors in a spirit of love.

### Latin text

Restat igitur, ut laedere me rescribendo disponeres, si certo documento meas esse illas litteras nosses. atque ita, quia non credo, quod iniuste me laedendum putares, superest, ut agnoscam peccatum meum, quod prior te illis litteris laeserim, quas meas esse negare non possum. cur itaque conor contra fluminis tractum ac non potius ueniam peto? obsecro ergo te per mansuetudinem Christi, ut, si laesi te, dimittas mihi nec me uicissim laedendo malum pro malo reddas. laedes autem me, si mihi tacueris errorem meum, quem forte inueneris in factis uel dictis meis. nam si ea in me reprehenderis, quae reprehendenda non sunt, te laedis magis quam me, quod absit a moribus et sancto proposito tuo, ut hoc facias uoluntate laedendi culpans in me aliquid dente maledico; quod mente ueridica scis non esse culpandum. ac per hoc aut beniuolo corde argues, etiam si caret delicto, quod arguendum putas, aut paterno affectu mulceas, quem adicere nequeas. potest enim fieri, ut tibi aliud uideatur, quam ueritas habet, dum tamen abs te aliud non fiat, quam caritas habet. et ego amicissimam reprehensionem gratissime accipiam, etiam si reprehendi non meruit, quod recte defendi non potest, aut agnoscam simul et beniuolentiam tuam et culpam meam et, quantum dominus donat, in alio gratus, in alio emendatus inueniar.

### English translation (Claude)

It remains, then, that you intended to injure me by your reply, should you know by certain proof that the letter was mine. And so, since I do not believe that you would think I should be injured unjustly, all that is left is for me to acknowledge my sin, that I first injured you by that letter which I cannot deny is mine. Why then do I strive against the stream instead of asking pardon? I beseech you, therefore, by the gentleness of Christ, that, if I have injured you, you forgive me, and do not in turn injure me and so render evil for evil. But you will injure me if you keep silent to me about my error, should you perhaps find one in my deeds or words. For if you rebuke in me things that do not deserve rebuke, you injure yourself more than me; and far be it from your character and holy way of life that you should do this with intent to injure, faulting in me with a slanderous tooth something which your truthful mind knows is not to be faulted. And therefore either you will reprove with a kindly heart what you think should be reproved, even if it is free of fault, or you will soothe with a father’s affection one whom you cannot win over. For it can happen that something seems otherwise to you than the truth holds, provided only that you do nothing otherwise than love requires. And I shall most gratefully receive a most friendly rebuke, even if what cannot rightly be defended did not deserve rebuke; or I shall acknowledge both your kindness and my fault, and, as far as the Lord grants, I shall be found grateful in the one and corrected in the other.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 10:1: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- ‘Whom you cannot win over’: the printed quem adicere nequeas is obscure (perhaps for quem docere nequeas, ‘whom you cannot teach’); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.3 (CSEL 34.2:265–267; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-3).

## Letter 73.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:267–268
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he welcomes Jerome’s correction, even if it stings, and invites the ‘weary ox’ to tread hard on his faults.

### Latin text

Quid ergo fortasse dura sed certe salubria uerba tua tamquam caestus Entelli pertimescam? caedebatur ille, non curabatur et ideo uincebatur, non sanabatur. ego autem si medicinalem correptionem tuam tranquillus accepero, non dolebo; si uero infirmitas uelut humana uel mea, etiam cum ueraciter arguor, non potest nisi aliquantulum contristari, melius tumor capitis dolet, dum curatur, quam, dum ei parcitur, non sanatur. hoc est enim, quod acute uidit, qui dixit utiliores esse plerumque inimicos iurgantes quam amicos obiurgare metuentes; illi enim dum rixantur, dicunt aliquando uera, quae corrigamus, isti autem minorem, quam oportet, exhibent iustitiae libertatem, dum amicitiae timent exasperare dulcedinem. quapropter, etsi bos, ut tibi uideris, lassus senectute forte corporis, non uigore animi tamen in area dominica fructuoso labore desudans, ecce sum, si quid perperam dixi, fortius fige pedem. non mihi esse debet molestum pondus aetatis tuae, dum conteratur palea culpae meae.

### English translation (Claude)

Why then should I dread your words, harsh perhaps but certainly wholesome, as if they were the gauntlets of Entellus? He was beaten, not cured, and so he was conquered, not healed. But if I receive your medicinal correction calmly, I shall not grieve; and if human weakness, or my own, cannot but be somewhat saddened even when I am truly rebuked, it is better that a swelling on the head should hurt while it is being cured than that it should be spared and not healed. For this is what was keenly seen by the man who said that quarrelling enemies are often more useful than friends who are afraid to rebuke; for the former, while they wrangle, sometimes say true things that we may correct, whereas the latter show less freedom of justice than they ought, for fear of embittering the sweetness of friendship. Therefore, although you are, as you think yourself, an ox wearied perhaps by bodily old age, yet not in vigour of mind, sweating with fruitful labour on the Lord’s threshing floor, here I am: if I have said anything amiss, ‘plant your foot more firmly.’ The weight of your years ought not to trouble me, so long as the chaff of my fault is trodden out.

### Scripture references

- Deut 25:4: echo, low confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Amic. 90 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The saying about enemies and friends is Cato’s, as reported by Cicero, On Friendship 90. ‘Plant your foot more firmly’ and the weary ox are Jerome’s own words in Ep. 72; the image recalls the ox treading out grain (Deut 25:4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.4 (CSEL 34.2:267–268; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-4).

## Letter 73.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:268–270
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine wishes he lived near Jerome, laments the slow delivery of his letters, and proposes sending a young man to study with him.

### Latin text

Proinde illud, quod in extremo epistulae tuae posuisti, cum magni desiderii suspirio uel lego uel recolo. utinam, inquis, mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus! ego autem dico: Utinam saltem propinquis terrarum locis habitaremus, ut, si non possunt misceri nostra conloquia, litterae possent esse crebriores! nunc uero tanto locorum interuallo absumus a sensibus nostris, ut de illis uerbis apostoli ad Galatas iuuenem me ad tuam sanctitatem scripsisse meminerim et ecce iam senex nondum rescripta meruerim faciliusque ad te exemplaria epistulae meae peruenerint nescio qua occasione praeueniente quam ipsa epistula me curante; homo enim, qui eam tunc acceperat, nec ad te pertulerit nec ad me rettulerit. tantae mihi autem in litteris tuis, quae in manus nostras uenire potuerunt, apparent litterae, ut nihil studiorum meorum mallem, si possem, quam inhaerere lateri tuo. quod ego quia non possum, aliquem nostrorum in domino filiorum erudiendum nobis ad te mittere cogito, si etiam de hac re tua rescripta meruero. nam neque in me tantum scientiae scripturarum diuinarum est aut esse iam poterit, quantum inesse tibi uideo, et si quid in hac re habeo facultatis, utcumque inpendo populo dei. uacare autem studiosis diligentius, quam populi audiunt, instruendis propter ecclesiasticas occupationes omnino non possum.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, I read and reread with a sigh of great longing what you put at the end of your letter: ‘Would that we were worthy of your embrace, and that by talking together we might either teach or learn something!’ But I say: would that we lived at least in neighbouring lands, so that, if our conversations cannot be joined, our letters might be more frequent! As it is, we are separated from each other’s perceptions by so great a distance that I remember writing to your Holiness as a young man about those words of the apostle to the Galatians, and here I am now an old man and still have not been favoured with a reply; and copies of my letter reached you more easily, through some chance or other that came first, than the letter itself through my care; for the man who had then received it neither delivered it to you nor brought it back to me. And so great is the learning that appears to me in those of your writings that have been able to reach our hands that there is nothing I would rather do in my studies, if I could, than cleave to your side. Since I cannot do this, I am thinking of sending to you one of our sons in the Lord to be instructed for our benefit, if I am favoured with your reply on this matter too. For there is not in me so much knowledge of the divine Scriptures, nor can there now be, as I see is in you; and whatever ability I have in this matter I spend, as best I can, on the people of God. But because of my church duties I am altogether unable to give time to instructing the studious more thoroughly than the congregations hear.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.5 (CSEL 34.2:268–270; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-5).

## Letter 73.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:270–271
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine grieves over the quarrel between Jerome and Rufinus, which shows that no friend can be sure of another’s future.

### Latin text

Nescio quae scripta maledica super tuo nomine ad Africam peruenisse nescimus; accepimus tamen, quod dignatus es mittere illis respondens maledictis. quo perlecto, fateor, multum dolui inter tam caras familiaresque personas cunctis paene ecclesiis notissimo amicitiae uinculo copulatas tantum malum extitisse discordiae. et tu quidem quantum tibi modereris quantumque teneas aculeos indignationis tuae, ne reddas maledictum pro maledicto, satis in tuis litteris eminet. uerum tamen si, eas ipsas cum legissem, contabui dolore, et obrigui timore, quid de me illa facerent, quae in te scripsit, si in manus meas forte uenissent. uae mundo ab scandalis! ecce fit, ecce prorsus impletur, quod ueritas ait: Quoniam abundabit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum. quae sibi enim iam fida pectora tuto refundantur? in cuius sensus tota se proiciat secura dilectio? quis denique amicus non formidetur quasi futurus inimicus, si potuit inter Hieronymum et Rufinum hoc, quod plangimus, exoriri? o misera et miseranda condicio! o infida in uoluntatibus amicorum scientia praesentium, ubi nulla est praescientia futurorum! sed quid hoc alteri de altero gemendum putem, quando ne ipse quidem sibi homo est notus in posterum? nouit enim utcumque uix forte, nunc qualis sit; qualis autem postea futurus sit, ignorat.

### English translation (Claude)

What abusive writings concerning you may have reached Africa, we do not know; we have, however, received what you were pleased to send in answer to those abuses. When I had read it, I confess, I grieved greatly that so great an evil of discord had arisen between persons so dear and intimate, joined by a bond of friendship known to almost all the churches. And indeed how far you restrain yourself, and how far you hold back the stings of your indignation so as not to return abuse for abuse, stands out plainly enough in your writing. And yet, if I wasted away with grief and grew stiff with fear when I read even this, what would the things he wrote against you have done to me, had they happened to come into my hands? ‘Woe to the world because of offences!’ See, it is happening; see, it is being wholly fulfilled, what the Truth said: ‘Because iniquity will abound, the love of many will grow cold.’ For what faithful hearts can now pour themselves out safely to each other? Into whose mind may trusting love cast itself wholly and securely? In short, what friend is not to be feared as a possible future enemy, if what we lament could arise between Jerome and Rufinus? O wretched and pitiable condition! O untrustworthy knowledge of friends’ present wills, where there is no foreknowledge of the future! But why should I think this a thing for one man to lament about another, when not even a man himself is known to himself for the future? For he knows, perhaps, and barely, what he is now; but what he will be afterwards he does not know.

### Scripture references

- Matt 18:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome had sent Augustine his reply (the Apology against Rufinus) to Rufinus’s attacks. Quotations: Matt 18:7; Matt 24:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.6 (CSEL 34.2:270–271; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-6).

## Letter 73.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:271–272
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome how the devil could have been blessed as a good angel if angels foreknow their future, and repeats his longing to meet him.

### Latin text

Haec porro non tantum scientia, qualis quisque sit, uerum etiam praescientia, qualis futurus sit, si est in sanctis et beatis angelis, quo modo fuerit diabolus beatus aliquando, cum adhuc angelus bonus esset, sciens futuram iniquitatem suam et sempiternum supplicium, omnino non uideo. de qua re, si tamen eam nosse opus est, uellem audire, quid sentias. uide, quid faciant terrae ac maria, quae nos corporaliter dirimunt. si haec epistula mea, quam legis, ego essem, iam mihi diceres, quod quaesiui; nunc uero quando rescribes? quando mittes? quando perueniet? quando accipiam? et tamen utinam quandoque fiat, quod tam cito fieri non posse, quam uolumus, quanta possumus tolerantia sustinemus! unde recurro ad illa uerba epistulae tuae dulcissima sanctique desiderii plenissima et ea facio uicissim mea: Utinam mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus, si tamen esse ullo modo posset, quod ego te docerem.

### English translation (Claude)

Moreover, if the holy and blessed angels have not only this knowledge of what each one is, but also the foreknowledge of what he will be, I do not see at all how the devil was ever blessed while he was still a good angel, if he knew his future iniquity and everlasting punishment. On this question, if indeed it is necessary to know it, I should like to hear what you think. See what the lands and seas that separate us in body bring about. If this letter of mine that you are reading were I myself, you would already be telling me what I asked; but as it is, when will you write back? When will you send? When will it arrive? When shall I receive it? And yet, would that it might happen some day! We bear with all the patience we can that it cannot happen as quickly as we wish. So I return to those most sweet words of your letter, full of holy longing, and make them mine in turn: ‘Would that we were worthy of your embrace, and that by talking together we might either teach or learn something,’ if indeed it were possible in any way that I should teach you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.7 (CSEL 34.2:271–272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-7).

## Letter 73.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:272–274
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine laments that bitterness arose between Jerome and Rufinus, once companions in the Holy Land, and longs to plead with them both to stop writing against each other.

### Latin text

In his autem uerbis non iam tuis tantum sed etiam meis ubi delector et reficior et ipso quamuis pendente et non adtingente utriusque nostrum desiderio non parua ex parte consolor, ibi rursus acerrimis dolorum stimulis fodior, dum cogito inter uos, quibus deus hoc ipsum, quod uterque nostrum optauit, largum prolixumque concesserat, ut coniunctissimi et familiarissimi mella scripturarum sanctarum pariter lamberetis, tantae amaritudinis inrepsisse perniciem quando non, ubi non, cui non homini formidandam, cum eo tempore, quo abiectis iam sarcinis saecularibus iam expediti dominum sequebamini et in ea terra uiuebatis simul, in qua dominus humanis pedibus ambulans: Pacem meam, inquit, do uobis, pacem meam relinquo uobis, uiris aetate maturis et in eloquio domini habitantibus uobis accidere potuit. uere temptatio est uita humana super terram. ei mihi, qui uos alicubi simul inuenire non possum! forte, ut moueor. ut doleo, ut timeo, prociderem ad pedes uestros, flerem. quantum ualerem, rogarem, quantum amarem, nunc unumquemque uestrum pro se ipso nunc utrumque pro alterutro et pro aliis ac maxime infirmis, pro quibus Christus mortuus est, qui uos tamquam in theatro uitae huius cum magno sui periculo spectant, ne de uobis ea conscribendo spargatis, quae quoniam concordantes delere non poteritis, concordare nolitis aut quae concordes legere timeatis, ne iterum litigetis.

### English translation (Claude)

But in these words, which are now not only yours but mine as well, where I am delighted and refreshed, and where I am in no small part consoled by our mutual longing itself, though it hangs unfulfilled and does not reach its goal, there again I am pierced by the sharpest goads of grief, when I think how, between you two, to whom God had granted generously and abundantly the very thing that each of us has wished, that, most closely joined and intimate, you might together taste the honey of the holy Scriptures, so great a bane of bitterness has crept in. When, where, to what man is it not to be feared, if it could befall you, men of mature age dwelling in the word of the Lord, at the very time when, having cast off the baggage of the world, you were following the Lord unencumbered and living together in that land where the Lord, walking on human feet, said, ‘My peace I give to you, my peace I leave with you’? Truly, human life on earth is a trial. Alas for me, that I cannot find you anywhere together! Perhaps, moved, grieving, fearing as I am, I would fall at your feet, I would weep; I would plead as much as I could, as much as I love, now with each of you for himself, now with both for each other, and for others, especially the weak, for whom Christ died, who watch you as in the theatre of this life to their own great peril, that you would not, by writing such things about each other, spread abroad things which, since you will not be able to blot them out once reconciled, would make you unwilling to be reconciled, or which you would fear to read once reconciled, lest you quarrel again.

### Scripture references

- John 14:27: quotation, high confidence
- Job 7:1: quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 8:11: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:9: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- ‘Human life on earth is a trial’: Job 7:1 in the Old Latin (the Vulgate has militia, ‘warfare’). Quotation of John 14:27; allusions to Rom 14:15 / 1 Cor 8:11 and 1 Cor 4:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.8 (CSEL 34.2:272–274; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-8).

## Letter 73.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:274–276
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks that they discuss their differences without bitterness, or else drop them, and promises to defend his views without wronging Jerome while begging pardon for any offence.

### Latin text

Verum dico caritati tuae nihil me magis quam hoc exemplum tremuisse, cum quaedam ad me in epistula tua legerem tuae indignationis indicia, non tam illa de Entello et de boue lasso, ubi mihi hilariter iocari quam iracunde minari uisus es. quam illud, quod serio te scripsisse satis apparet, unde supra locutus sum plus fortasse, quam debui, sed non plus, quam timui, ubi aisti: Ne forte laesus iuste expostulares. rogo te, si fieri potest, ut inter nos quaeramus et disseramus aliquid, quo sine amaritudine discordiae corda nostra pascantur fiat. si autem non possum dicere, quid mihi emendandum uideatur in scriptis tuis nec tu in meis nisi cum suspicione inuidiae aut laesione amicitiae, quiescamus ab his et nostrae uitae salutique parcamus. minus certe adsequatur illa, quae inflat, dum non offendatur illa, quae aedificat. ego me longe esse sentio ab illa perfectione, de qua scriptum est: Si quis in uerbo non offendit, hic perfectus est uir. sed plane in dei misericordia puto me posse facile abs te petere ueniam, si quid offendi. quod mihi aperire debes, ut, cum te audiero, lucreris fratrem tuum. neque enim, quia hoc propter longinquitatem terrarum non potes facere inter me et te, propterea debes sinere errare me. prorsus quod ad ipsas res, quas nosse uolumus, adtinet, si quid ueri me tenere uel scio uel credo uel puto, in quo tu aliter sentis, quantum dat dominus, sine tua iniuria conabor adserere. quod autem pertinet ad offensionem tuam, cum te indignatum sensero, nihil aliud quam ueniam deprecabor.

### English translation (Claude)

I tell your Charity truly that nothing made me tremble more than this example when I read in your letter to me certain signs of your indignation: not so much the remarks about Entellus and the weary ox, where you seemed to me to be joking cheerfully rather than threatening angrily, as that which you plainly wrote in earnest, about which I spoke above more, perhaps, than I should have, but not more than I feared, where you said, ‘Lest perhaps, being injured, you should justly complain.’ I ask you: if it is possible for us to inquire and discuss something between us by which our hearts may be fed without the bitterness of discord, let it be done. But if I cannot say what seems to me to need correcting in your writings, nor you in mine, without suspicion of envy or injury to friendship, let us leave these things alone and spare our life and salvation. Let that which ‘puffs up’ certainly achieve less, so long as that which ‘builds up’ is not offended. I feel that I am far from that perfection of which it is written, ‘If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man.’ But plainly I think that, by God’s mercy, I can easily ask your pardon if I have given any offence. You ought to open it to me, so that when I have heard you, you may gain your brother. Nor, because you cannot do this between you and me alone owing to the distance of our lands, ought you therefore to let me go on erring. As for the matters themselves that we wish to know, if I know or believe or think that I hold some truth in which you think otherwise, I shall try, as far as the Lord grants, to maintain it without wronging you. But as for your offence, when I perceive that you are indignant, I shall do nothing but beg your pardon.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:1: allusion, high confidence
- Jas 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to 1 Cor 8:1 (‘knowledge puffs up, love builds up’) and Matt 18:15; quotation of Jas 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.9 (CSEL 34.2:274–276; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-9).

## Letter 73.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:276–279
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reflects that the best defence against a friend turned enemy is a clear conscience, and hopes Jerome and Rufinus will be reconciled.

### Latin text

Nec omnino arbitror te suscensere potuisse, nisi aut hoc dicerem, quod non debui, aut non sic dicerem, ut debui, quia nec miror minus nos scire inuicem, quam scimur a coniunctissimis et familiarissimis nostris. in quorum ego caritatem, fateor, facile me totum proicio praesertim fatigatum scandalis saeculi et in ea sine ulla sollicitudine requiesco. deum quippe illic esse sentio, in quem me securus proicio et in quo securus requiesco. nec in hac mea securitate crastinum illud humanae fragilitatis incertum, de quo superius gemui, omnino formido. cum enim hominem Christiana caritate flagrantem eaque mihi fidelem amicum factum esse sentio, quicquid ei consiliorum meorum cogitationumque committo, non homini committo sed illi, in quo manet, ut talis sit; deus enim caritas est et, qui manet in caritate, in deo manet. quem si deseruerit, tantum faciat necesse est dolorem, quantum manens fecerat gaudium. uerum tamen ex amico intimo factus inimicus quaerat sibi potius, quod fingat astutus, non inueniat, quod prodat iratus. hoc autem unusquisque facile adsequitur non occultando, quod fecerit, sed non faciendo, quod occultari uelit. quod misericordia dei bonis piisque concedit, ut inter inimicos quoslibet futuros liberi securique uersentur, aliena peccata sibi commissa non prodant, quae prodi timeant, ipsi nulla committant. cum enim falsum quid a maledico fingitur, aut omnino non creditur aut certe integra salute sola fama uexatur. quod autem malum perpetratur, hostis est intimus, etiam si nullius intimi loquacitate aut lite uulgetur. quapropter quis prudentium non uideat, etiam tu quam tolerabiliter feras amicissimi quondam et familiarissimi incredibiles nunc inimicitias consolante conscientia et quem ad modum, uel quod iactitat uel quod a quibusdam forsitan creditur, in sinistris armis deputes, quibus non minus quam dextris contra diabolum dimicatur? uerum tamen illum maluerim aliquo modo mitiorem quam te isto modo armatiorem. hoc magnum et triste miraculum est ex amicitiis talibus ad has inimicitias peruenisse. laetum erit et multo maius ei inimicitiis talibus ad pristinam concordiam reuertisse.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor do I think at all that you could have been angry unless I had either said what I ought not, or not said it as I ought; for I do not wonder that we know each other less than we are known by those most closely joined and intimate with us. Into their love, I confess, I readily cast myself wholly, especially when wearied by the offences of the world, and in it I rest without any anxiety; for I feel that God is there, into whom I cast myself securely and in whom I rest securely. Nor in this security of mine do I fear at all that uncertain tomorrow of human frailty which I lamented above. For when I feel that a man is aflame with Christian love and has by it become a faithful friend to me, whatever of my plans and thoughts I entrust to him, I entrust not to a man but to Him in whom he abides, so that he is such; ‘for God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God.’ If he forsakes that love, he must cause as much pain as the joy he caused while he abided in it. Yet even so, let one who from an intimate friend has become an enemy have to seek what he may cunningly invent, rather than find what he may betray in anger. And this anyone easily achieves, not by hiding what he has done, but by not doing what he would wish hidden. This the mercy of God grants to the good and godly, that among any future enemies they may live free and secure: they do not betray the sins of others entrusted to them, and they themselves commit none that they would fear to have betrayed. For when something false is invented by a slanderer, either it is not believed at all, or at least one’s reputation alone is troubled while one’s salvation remains whole. But an evil that is committed is an inward enemy, even if it is not published by the talk or quarrel of any intimate. Therefore what sensible man does not see how bearable you, too, find the incredible enmity, now, of one once your dearest and most intimate friend, since your conscience consoles you; and how you count what he boasts of, or what perhaps some believe, among the weapons on the left hand, with which one fights the devil no less than with those on the right? Yet I would rather he were somehow milder than that you were so much better armed. It is a great and sad marvel to have come from such friendship to such enmity; it will be a joyful and much greater one to have returned from such enmity to the former concord.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of 1 John 4:16; allusion to 2 Cor 6:7–8 (‘weapons of righteousness for the right hand and the left’).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 73.10 (CSEL 34.2:276–279; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-73-10).

## Letter 74.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-74-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:279–280
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Praesidius to forward his letter to Jerome and, if he finds Augustine at fault, to tell Augustine rather than Jerome.

### Latin text

Sicut praesens rogaui sinceritatem tuam, nunc quoque commoneo, ut litteras meas sancto fratri et conpresbytero nostro Hieronymo mittere non graueris. ut autem nouerit caritas tua, quem ad modum etiam tu illi pro mea causa scribere debeas, misi exemplaria litterarum et mearum ad ipsum et ad me ipsius, quibus lectis pro tua sancta prudentia. facile uideas et modum meum, quem seruandum putaui, et motum eius, quem non frustra timui. aut si ego, quod non debui uel quo modo non debui, aliquid scripsi, non ad illum de me sed ad me ipsum potius fraterna dilectione mitte sermonem, quo correctus petam, ut ignoscat, si meam culpam ipse cognouero.

### English translation (Claude)

As I asked your Sincerity when I was with you, so now too I remind you not to be reluctant to send my letter to our holy brother and fellow presbyter Jerome. And so that your Charity may know how you too ought to write to him on my behalf, I have sent copies of my letters to him and of his to me; when you have read them, in your holy prudence you will easily see both the restraint which I thought I should keep and his agitation, which I did not fear in vain. Or, if I have written anything I ought not, or in a way I ought not, send a word, in brotherly love, not to him about me but rather to me myself, so that, being corrected, I may ask him to forgive me, if I myself come to recognize my fault.

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Praesidius (named in the manuscripts’ heading, not in the staged text).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 74.1 (CSEL 34.2:279–280; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-74-1).

## Letter 75.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:280–281
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome tells Augustine that he has received his three letters, which he regards as criticisms of his works, and must answer them in haste.

### Latin text

Tres simul epistulas, immo libellos breues per diaconum Cyprianum tuae dignationis accepi diuersas, ut tu nominas, quaestiones, ut ego sentio, reprehensiones meorum opusculorum continentes. ad quas si respondere uoluero, libri magnitudine opus erit; tamen conabor, quantum facere possum. modum non egredi epistulae longioris et festinanti fratri moram non facere, qui ante triduum, quam profecturus erat, a me epistulas flagitauit, ut paene in procinctu haec, qualiacumque sunt, effutire compellar et tumultuario respondere sermone non maturitate scribentis sed dictantis temeritate, quae plerumque non in doctrinam sed in casum uertitur, ut fortissimos quoque milites subita bella conturbant et ante coguntur fugere, quam possint arma corripere.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received from your Worthiness, by the deacon Cyprian, three letters at once, or rather three short books, containing various questions, as you call them, but, as I perceive, criticisms of my little works. If I wished to answer them, it would take a book of great size; yet I shall try, as far as I can, not to go beyond the limit of a longer letter, and not to delay our brother, who is in a hurry and asked me for letters only three days before he was to set out, so that I am forced to blurt out these things, such as they are, almost under arms, and to answer in hasty language, not with the deliberation of one who writes but with the rashness of one who dictates, which mostly turns out to be not a matter of learning but of chance, just as sudden wars throw even the bravest soldiers into confusion, and they are forced to flee before they can snatch up their arms.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Jerome to Augustine (Ep. 112 in Jerome’s collection).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.1 (CSEL 34.2:280–281; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-1).

## Letter 75.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:281–284
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome arms himself with Scripture for the debate, hopes the truth will win whichever of them is right, and turns to Augustine’s questions.

### Latin text

Ceterum nostra armatura Christus est et apostoli institutio, qui scribit ad Ephesios: Adsumite arma dei, ut possitis resistere in die malo; et rursus: State succincti lumbos uestros in ueritate et induti loricam iustitiae et calciati pedes in praeparatione euangelii pacis super omnia accipientes scutum fidei, in quo possitis uniuersa tela maligni ignita extinguere, et galeam salutis accipite et gladium spiritus, quod est uerbum dei. his quondam telis rex Dauid armatus procedebat ad proelium et quinque lapides de torrente accipiens leuigatos nihil asperitatis et sordium inter huius saeculi turbines in sensibus suis esse monstrabat bibens de torrente in uia et idcirco exaltatus caput superbissimum Goliath suo potissimum mucrone truncauit percutiens in fronte blasphemum et in ea parte corporis uulnerans, in qua et praesumptor sacerdotii Ozias lepra percutitur. et sanctus gloriatur in domino dicens: Signatum est super nos lumen uultus tui, domine. dicamus igitur et nos: Paratum cor meum, deus, paratum cor meum; cantabo et psallam in gloria mea; exsurge psalterium et cithara, exsurgam diluculo, ut in nobis possit impleri: Aperi os tuum et implebo illud, et: Dominus dabit uerbum euangelizantibus uirtute multa. te quoque ipsum orare non dubito, ut inter nos contendentes ueritas superet. non enim tuam quaeris gloriam sed Christi, cumque tu uiceris, et ego uincam, si meum errorem intellexero, et e contrario me uincente tu superas, quia non filii parentibus sed parentes filiis thesaurizant. et in Paralipomenon libro legimus, quod filii Israhel ad pugnandum processerint mente pacifica inter ipsos quoque gladios et effusiones sanguinis et cadauera prostratorum non suam sed pacis uictoriam cogitantes. respondeamus igitur ad omnia et multiplices quaestiones breui, si Christus iusserit, sermone soluamus, praetermitto salutationes et officia, quibus meum demulces caput; taceo de blanditiis, quibus reprehensionem mei niteris consolari; ad ipsas causas ueniam.

### English translation (Claude)

But our armour is Christ and the teaching of the apostle, who writes to the Ephesians: ‘Take up the armour of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day’; and again: ‘Stand, therefore, having your loins girded with truth and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace, above all taking the shield of faith, with which you may be able to quench all the fiery darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.’ Armed with these weapons, King David once went forth to battle, and, taking five smooth stones from the brook, showed that there was nothing rough or filthy in his mind amid the whirlwinds of this world, drinking from the brook by the way; and therefore, being exalted, he cut off the most proud head of Goliath with Goliath’s own sword, striking the blasphemer in the forehead and wounding him in that part of the body in which Uzziah too, who presumed to take the priesthood, was struck with leprosy. And the saint glories in the Lord, saying: ‘The light of your countenance, O Lord, is sealed upon us.’ Let us also, then, say: ‘My heart is ready, O God, my heart is ready; I will sing and give praise in my glory. Awake, psaltery and harp; I will awake at dawn,’ so that in us may be fulfilled, ‘Open your mouth and I will fill it,’ and, ‘The Lord will give the word to those who preach the good news with great power.’ I do not doubt that you too pray that, as we contend, the truth may prevail. For you seek not your own glory but Christ’s; and when you win, I too shall win, if I understand my error; and conversely, when I win, you are the victor, because children do not lay up for their parents but parents for their children. And in the book of Chronicles we read that the children of Israel went forth to fight with a peaceful mind, thinking even amid swords and the shedding of blood and the corpses of the fallen not of their own victory but of the victory of peace. Let us answer, then, everything, and, if Christ so commands, resolve these many questions in brief language. I pass over the greetings and courtesies with which you stroke my head; I say nothing of the flattery with which you try to soften your rebuke of me; I shall come to the matters themselves.

### Scripture references

- Eph 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 6:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Sam 17:40: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 110:7 (109:7 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Sam 17:51: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Chr 26:19: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 4:6 (4:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 108:1 (107:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 81:10 (80:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 68:11 (67:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Chr 12:38: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Eph 6:13–17; Ps 4:6 (LXX 4:7); Ps 108:1–2 (LXX 107:2–3; cf. Ps 57:7–8); Ps 81:10 (LXX 80:11); Ps 68:11 (LXX 67:12); allusions to 1 Sam 17:40–51, Ps 110:7, 2 Chr 26:19–20, 2 Cor 12:14. The reference to Chronicles (warriors with a peaceful mind) is uncertain; perhaps 1 Chr 12:38 (LXX ‘with a peaceful heart’).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.2 (CSEL 34.2:281–284; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-2).

## Letter 75.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:284–285
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome explains that his catalogue of Christian writers is titled ‘On Illustrious Men’, not ‘Epitaph’.

### Latin text

Dicis accepisse te librum meum a quodam fratre, qui titulum non haberet, in quo scriptores ecclesiasticos tam Graecos quam Latinos enumerauerim, cumque ab eo quaereres, ut tuis uerbis utar, cur liminaris pagina non esset inscripta uel quo censeretur nomine, respondisse appellari epitaphium et argumentaris, quod recte sic uocaretur, si eorum tantum uel uitas uel scripta ibi legisses, qui iam defuncti essent; cum uero multorum et eo tempore, quo scribebatur, et nunc usque uiuentium ibi commemorentur opuscula, mirari te, cur ei hunc titulum inposuerim. puto intellegere prudentiam tuam, quod ex opere ipso titulum potueris intellegere; legisti enim et Graecos et Latinos, qui uitas uirorum inlustrium descripserunt, quod numquam epitaphium huic operi scripserint sed de inlustribus uiris uerbi gratia ducibus, philosophis, oratoribus, historicis, poetis epicis, tragicis, comicis. epitaphium autem proprie scribitur mortuorum, quod quidem in dormitione sanctae memoriae Nepotiani presbyteri olim fecisse me noui. ergo hic liber uel de inlustribus uiris uel proprie de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis appellandus est, licet a plerisque emendatoribus inperitis de auctoribus dicatur inscriptus.

### English translation (Claude)

You say that you received from a certain brother a book of mine without a title, in which I listed the church writers, Greek as well as Latin, and that, when you asked him (to use your own words) why the first page had no title, or by what name it was known, he answered that it was called ‘Epitaph’; and you argue that it would rightly be so called if you had read there only the lives or writings of those who were already dead; but since the works of many who were living when it was written, and are living still, are recorded there, you wonder why I gave it this title. I think your Prudence understands that you could have gathered the title from the work itself. For you have read both the Greeks and the Latins who described the lives of illustrious men, and they never gave the title ‘Epitaph’ to such a work, but ‘On Illustrious Men’, for example generals, philosophers, orators, historians, epic, tragic, and comic poets. An epitaph, on the other hand, is properly written of the dead, such as I remember I once composed on the falling asleep of the presbyter Nepotian of holy memory. This book, therefore, should be called either ‘On Illustrious Men’ or, properly, ‘On Church Writers’, although many unskilled correctors are said to have titled it ‘On Authors’.

### Translation notes

- Jerome’s De viris illustribus; the epitaph on Nepotian is his Ep. 60.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.3 (CSEL 34.2:284–285; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-3).

## Letter 75.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:285–288
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome answers that his view of Peter and Paul at Antioch (Gal 2) was taken from Origen and other Greek commentators and left to the reader’s judgment.

### Latin text

In secundo loco quaeris, cur dixerim in commentariis epistulae ad Galatas Paulum id in Petro non potuisse reprehendere, quod ipse fecerat, nec in alio arguere simulationem, cuius ipse tenebatur reus, et adseris reprehensionem apostolicam non fuisse dispensatoriam sed ueram et me non debere docere mendacium, sed uniuersa, quae scripta sunt, ita sonare, ut scripta sunt. ad quae primum respondeo debuisse prudentiam tuam praefatiunculae commentariorum meorum meminisse dicentis ex persona mea: Quid igitur? ego stultus aut temerarius, qui id pollicear, quod ille non potuit? minime! quin potius in eo mihi uideor cautior atque timidior, quod inbecillitatem uirium mearum sentiens Origenis commentarios sum secutus. scripsit enim ille uir in epistulam Pauli ad Galatas quinque proprie uolumina et decimum Stromatum suorum librum commatico super explanatione eius sermone compleuit; tractatus quoque uarios et excerpta, quae uel sola possent sufficere, composuit. praetermitto Didymum uidentem meum et Laodicenum de ecclesia nuper egressum et Alexandrum ueterem haereticum, Eusebium quoque Emisenum et Theodorum Heracleotem, qui et ipsi nonnullos super hac re commentarios reliquerunt. e quibus uel si pauca decerperem, fieret aliquid, quod non penitus contemneretur. et, ut simpliciter fatear, legi haec omnia et in mente mea plurima coaceruans accito notario uel mea uel aliena dictaui nec ordinis nec uerborum interdum nec sensuum memor. iam domini misericordiae est, ne per inperitiam nostram ab aliis bene dicta dispereant et non placeant inter extraneos, quae placent inter suos. si quid igitur reprehensione dignum putaueras in explanatione nostra, eruditionis tuae fuerat quaerere, utrum ea, quae scripsimus, haberentur in Graecis, ut, si illi non dixissent, tunc meam proprie sententiam condemnares, praesertim cum libere in praefatione confessus sim Origenis commentarios me secutum et uel mea uel aliena dictasse et in fine eiusdem capituli, quod reprehendis, scripserim: Si cui iste non placet sensus, quo nec Petrus peccasse nec Paulus procaciter ostenditur arguisse maiorem, debet exponere, qua consequentia Paulus in altero reprehendat, quod ipse commisit. ex quo ostendi me non ex definito id defendere, quod in Graecis legeram, sed ea expressisse, quae legeram, ut lectoris arbitrio derelinquerem, utrum probanda essent an inprobanda.

### English translation (Claude)

In the second place you ask why I said, in my commentary on the Letter to the Galatians, that Paul could not have rebuked in Peter what he had done himself, nor censured in another a pretence of which he himself was guilty; and you assert that the apostle’s rebuke was not a matter of arrangement but real, and that I ought not to teach falsehood, but that everything written means just what is written. To this I answer first that your Prudence ought to have remembered the little preface of my commentary, which says in my own person: ‘What then? Am I foolish or rash to promise what he could not? Not at all! Rather I think I am more cautious and timid in this, that, feeling the weakness of my powers, I have followed the commentaries of Origen. For that man wrote five volumes specifically on Paul’s Letter to the Galatians, and filled the tenth book of his Stromata with a brief discussion of its explanation; he also composed various treatises and excerpts, which alone might suffice. I pass over my Didymus the Seer, and the Laodicean who has lately left the church, and Alexander, the heretic of old, and also Eusebius of Emesa and Theodore of Heraclea, who themselves also left some commentaries on this matter. Even if I culled only a little from these, something would result that would not be altogether despised. And, to confess it simply, I read all of these, and, heaping up a great deal in my mind, I called a secretary and dictated either my own thoughts or those of others, sometimes not remembering the order, or the words, or the sense. It now rests with the Lord’s mercy that what others said well should not perish through my lack of skill, and fail to please among strangers what pleases among its own.’ If, therefore, you thought anything in my explanation worthy of rebuke, it was for your learning to inquire whether what I wrote was to be found in the Greeks, so that, if they had not said it, you might then condemn the opinion as properly mine; especially since I openly confessed in the preface that I had followed Origen’s commentaries and dictated either my own thoughts or those of others, and since at the end of the very chapter you criticize I wrote: ‘If anyone does not like this interpretation, by which it is shown that Peter did not sin and that Paul did not insolently rebuke his superior, he ought to explain by what consistency Paul censures in another what he himself committed.’ By this I showed that I was not defending as settled what I had read in the Greeks, but had set out what I had read, so as to leave it to the reader’s judgment whether it should be approved or disapproved.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The dispute concerns Gal 2:11–14. Jerome quotes the preface of his Commentary on Galatians. ‘Didymus the Seer’ is Didymus the Blind; ‘the Laodicean’ is Apollinaris of Laodicea. Origen’s Stromata (lost) is not the work of Clement of Alexandria. The passage is part of the Jerome–Augustine dispute; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.4 (CSEL 34.2:285–288; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-4).

## Letter 75.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:288–289
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome mocks Augustine’s view that Jewish Christians remained bound to the law and says he himself merely reports the various interpretations of earlier writers.

### Latin text

Tu igitur ne, quod ego petieram, faceres, nouum argumentum repperisti, ut adsereres gentiles, qui in Christum credidissent, legis onere liberos, eos autem, qui ex Iudaeis crederent, legi esse subiectos, ut per utrorumque personam et Paulus recte reprehenderet eos, qui legem seruarent, quasi doctor gentium et Petrus iure reprehenderetur, qui princeps circumcisionis id imperauerit gentibus, quod soli, qui ex Iudaeis erant, debuerint obseruare. hoc si placet, immo quia placet, ut, quicumque credunt ex Iudaeis debitores sint legis faciendae, tu ut episcopus in toto orbe notissimus debes hanc promulgare sententiam et in adsensum tuum omnes coepiscopos trahere. ego in paruo tuguriunculo cum monachis, id est conpeccatoribus meis de magnis statuere non audeo, nisi hoc ingenue confiteri, me maiorum scripta legere et in commentariis secundum omnium consuetudinem uarias ponere explanationes, ut e multis sequatur unusquisque quod uelit. quod quidem puto te et in saeculari litteratura et in diuinis libris legisse et probasse.

### English translation (Claude)

So, to avoid doing what I had asked, you found a new argument: you assert that the Gentiles who had believed in Christ were free of the burden of the law, but that those who believed from among the Jews were subject to the law; so that, in the person of each, Paul rightly rebuked those who kept the law, as teacher of the Gentiles, and Peter was justly rebuked because, as chief of the circumcision, he had imposed on the Gentiles what only those who were from the Jews ought to observe. If this is your view, or rather since it is your view, that all who believe from among the Jews are bound to keep the law, you, as a bishop known throughout the whole world, ought to promulgate this opinion and draw all your fellow bishops into agreement with you. I, in my little hut with the monks, that is, with my fellow sinners, do not dare to decide great matters, except to confess frankly that I read the writings of my elders and, according to the custom of all, set down various explanations in my commentaries, so that from many each may follow what he wishes. This I think you too have read and approved, both in secular literature and in the divine books.

### Translation notes

- Sarcastic in tone; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.5 (CSEL 34.2:288–289; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-5).

## Letter 75.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:289–290
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome says that Origen, the later Greek commentators, and John Chrysostom held his view, which answered Porphyry’s attack on Paul, and challenges Augustine to name one supporter of his.

### Latin text

Hanc autem expositionem, quam primus Origenes in decimo Stromatum libro, ubi epistulam Pauli ad Galatas interpretatur, et ceteri deinceps interpretes sunt secuti, illa uel maxime causa subintroducunt, ut Porphyrio respondeant blasphemanti, qui Pauli arguit procacitatem, quod principem apostolorum Petrum ausus sit reprehendere et arguere in faciem ac ratione constringere, quod male fecerit, id est in eo errore fuerit, in quo fuit ipse, qui alium arguit delinquentem. quid dicam de Iohanne, qui dudum in pontificali gradu Constantinopolitanam rexit ecclesiam et proprie super hoc capitulo latissimum exarauit librum, in quo Origenis et ueterum sententiam est secutus? si igitur me reprehendis errantem, patere me, quaeso, errare cum talibus et, cum me erroris mei multos socios habere perspexeris, tu ueritatis tuae saltem unum adstipulatorem proferre debebis. haec de explanatione unius capituli epistulae ad Galatas.

### English translation (Claude)

This explanation, which Origen first gave in the tenth book of his Stromata, where he interprets Paul’s Letter to the Galatians, and which the other interpreters followed after him, they introduce chiefly for this reason: to answer the blasphemous Porphyry, who accuses Paul of insolence for daring to rebuke Peter, the chief of the apostles, to censure him to his face and to pin him down by argument for having done wrong, that is, for being in the same error as the man who censured another for his fault. What shall I say of John, who not long ago governed the church of Constantinople in the episcopal rank, and wrote a very long book specifically on this passage, in which he followed the view of Origen and the ancients? If, then, you rebuke me as in error, allow me, I beg you, to err with such men; and when you see that I have many companions in my error, you ought to produce at least one supporter of your truth. So much for the explanation of one passage of the Letter to the Galatians.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Porphyry, Porphyry, Chr. (Porphyry, Against the Christians (fragments)): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John is John Chrysostom (bishop of Constantinople 398–404), whose homily on Gal 2:11 is meant. On Porphyry’s attack see the extrabiblical tag.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.6 (CSEL 34.2:289–290; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-6).

## Letter 75.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:290–294
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome recounts from Acts how Peter was first taught that Gentiles are clean and led the Jerusalem council in freeing them from the law.

### Latin text

Sed ne uidear aduersum rationem tuam niti testium numero et occasione uirorum inlustrium subterfugere ueritatem nec manum audere conserere, breuiter de scripturis exempla proponam. in actibus apostolorum uox facta est ad Petrum dicens: Surge, Petre, occide et manduca, id est omnia animalia quadrupedum et serpentium terrae et uolatilium caeli. quo dicto ostenditur nullum hominem secundum naturam esse pollutum, sed aequaliter omnes ad Christi euangelium prouocari. ad quod Petrus respondit: Absit, quia numquam manducaui commune et inmundum. et uox secundo ad eum facta est: Quae deus purificauit, tu ne commune dixeris. iuit itaque Caesaream et ingressus ad Cornelium aperiens os suum dixit: In ueritate comperio, quoniam non est personarum acceptor deus, sed in omni gente, qui timet eum et operatur iustitiam, acceptus est illi. denique cecidit spiritus sanctus super eos et obstipuerunt ex circumcisione fideles, qui uenerant cum Petro, quod et in nationes gratia spiritus sancti esset effusa. tunc respondit Petrus: Numquid aquam quis prohibere potest, ut non baptizentur hi, qui spiritum sanctum acceperunt sicut et nos? et iussit eos in nomine Iesu Christi baptizari. audierunt autem apostoli et fratres, qui erant in Iudaea, quia et gentes recepissent uerbum dei. cum autem ascendisset Petrus Hierosolymam, disceptabant aduersus illum, qui erant ex circumcisione, dicentes: Quare introisti ad uiros praeputium habentes et manducasti cum illis? quibus omni ratione exposita nouissime orationem suam hoc sermone conclusit: Si ergo eandem gratiam dedit illis deus sicut et nobis, qui credidimus in dominum Iesum Christum, ego quis eram, qui possem prohibere deum? his auditis tacuerunt et glorificauerunt deum dicentes: Ergo et gentibus deus paenitentiam ad uitam dedit. rursum, cum multo post tempore Paulus et Barnabas uenissent Antiochiam et congregata ecclesia rettulissent, quanta fecisset deus cum illis et quia aperuisset gentibus ostium fidei, quidam descendentes de Iudaea docebant fratres atque dicebant: Nisi circumcidamini secundum morem Moysi, non potestis salui fieri. commota igitur seditione non minima aduersum Paulum et Barnaban statuerunt ascendere et ipsi, qui accusabantur, et hi, qui accusabant, ad apostolos et presbyteros Hierosolymam super hac quaestione, cumque Hierosolymam perrexissent et surrexissent quidam de haeresi Pharisaeorum, qui cre- diderant in Christo, dicentes: Oportet circumcidi eos et praecipere illis, ut seruent legem Moysi, et magna super hoc uerbo oriretur quaestio, Petrus solita libertate: Viri, inquit, fratres, uos scitis, quoniam ab antiquis diebus in nobis elegit deus per os meum audire gentes uerbum euangelii et credere et, qui nouit corda, deus testimonium perhibuit dans illis spiritum sanctum sicut et nobis et nihil discreuit inter nos et illos fide purificans corda eorum. nunc ergo quid temptatis deum inponere iugum super ceruicem discipulorum, quod neque patres nostri neque nos portare potuimus? sed per gratiam domini nostri Iesu Christi credimus saluari, quem ad modum et illi. tacuit autem omnis multitudo et in sententiam eius Iacobus apostolus et omnes simul presbyteri transierunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But so that I may not seem to rely on the number of witnesses against your reasoning, and to evade the truth under cover of illustrious men without daring to join battle, I shall briefly put forward examples from the Scriptures. In the Acts of the Apostles a voice came to Peter, saying, ‘Rise, Peter, kill and eat,’ that is, all kinds of four-footed animals and creeping things of the earth and birds of the air. By this saying it is shown that no man is unclean by nature, but that all are called equally to the gospel of Christ. To this Peter answered, ‘Far from it, for I have never eaten anything common and unclean.’ And a voice came to him a second time: ‘What God has cleansed, you must not call common.’ So he went to Caesarea, and, having entered Cornelius’s house, he opened his mouth and said, ‘In truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons, but in every nation whoever fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.’ Then the Holy Spirit fell upon them, and the believers from the circumcision who had come with Peter were astonished that the grace of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. Then Peter answered, ‘Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?’ And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Now the apostles and brethren who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles too had received the word of God. And when Peter had gone up to Jerusalem, those of the circumcision disputed with him, saying, ‘Why did you go in to men who are uncircumcised and eat with them?’ When he had explained everything to them in order, he concluded his speech with these words: ‘If, then, God gave them the same grace as he gave us, who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I, that I could hinder God?’ When they heard this they held their peace and glorified God, saying, ‘Then God has granted to the Gentiles also repentance unto life.’ Again, when a long time afterwards Paul and Barnabas had come to Antioch and, having gathered the church, had reported how much God had done with them and that he had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles, certain men coming down from Judea taught the brethren, saying, ‘Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.’ So, since no small dissension arose against Paul and Barnabas, they decided that both the accused and the accusers should go up to the apostles and presbyters at Jerusalem about this question. And when they had come to Jerusalem, and some of the sect of the Pharisees who had believed in Christ rose up, saying, ‘They must be circumcised and commanded to keep the law of Moses,’ and a great debate arose over this matter, Peter, with his usual boldness, said: ‘Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel and believe. And God, who knows the hearts, bore them witness, giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you tempt God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, just as they are.’ And all the multitude kept silence, and the apostle James and all the presbyters together came over to his opinion.

### Scripture references

- Acts 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:14: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:15: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:34: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:47: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 11:3: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 11:17: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 11:18: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 14:27: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 15:1: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:5: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and summary of Acts 10:13–15, 34–35, 44–48; 11:1–3, 17–18; 14:27; 15:1–2, 5–12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.7 (CSEL 34.2:290–294; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/73-1/#p-75-7).

## Letter 75.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:294–296
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome argues that Peter had been the first to teach that the law need not be kept, and withdrew from the Gentiles at Antioch only out of fear of losing the Jewish believers.

### Latin text

Haec non debent molesta esse lectori sed et illi et mihi utilia, ut probemus ante apostolum Paulum non ignorasse Petrum, immo principem huius fuisse decreti legem post euangelium non seruandam. denique tantae Petrus auctoritatis fuit, ut Paulus in epistula sua scripserit: Deinde post annos tres ueni Hierosolymam uidere Petrum et mansi apud illum diebus quindecim, rursumque in consequentibus: Post annos quattuordecim ascendi iterum Hierosolymam cum Barnaba adsumpto et Tito; ascendi autem secundum reuelationem et exposui illis euangelium, quod praedico inter gentes, ostendens non habuisse se securitatem euangelii praedicandi, nisi Petri et ceterorum, qui cum eo erant, fuisset sententia roboratum. statimque sequitur: Separatim autem his, qui uidebantur, ne forte in uacuum currerem aut cucurrissem. quare separatim et non in publico? ne fidelibus ex numero Iudaeorum, qui legem putabant esse seruandam et sic credendum in domino saluatore, fidei scandalum nasceretur. ergo et eo tempore, cum Petrus uenisset Antiochiam, licet hoc apostolorum acta non scribant, sed adfirmanti Paulo credendum sit, in faciem illi Paulus restitisse se scribit, quia reprehensibilis erat. prius enim, quam uenirent quidam a Iacobo, cum gentibus edebat; cum autem uenissent, subtrahebat se et segregabat timens eos, qui ex circumcisione erant. et consenserunt cum illo ceteri Iudaei, ita ut et Barnabas duceretur ab his in illa simulatione. sed cum uidissem, inquit, quod non recte ingrediuntur ad ueritatem euangelii, dixi Petro coram omnibus: Si tu, cum Iudaeus sis, gentiliter et non iudaice uiuis, quo modo gentes cogis iudaizare? et cetera. nulli ergo dubium est, quod Petrus apostolus sententiae huius, cuius nunc praeuaricator arguitur, primus auctor extiterit. causa autem praeuaricationis timor est Iudaeorum; dicit enim scriptura, quod primum edebat cum gentibus, cum autem uenissent quidam a Iacobo, subtrahebat se et segregabat timens eos, qui ex circumcisione erant. timet autem Iudaeos, quorum erat apostolus, ne per occasionem gentilium a fide Christi recederent et imitator pastoris boni perderet gregem sibi creditum.

### English translation (Claude)

These things should not be tiresome to the reader, but useful both to him and to me, so that we may prove that Peter was not ignorant, before the apostle Paul, that the law was not to be kept after the gospel; nay, that he was the chief author of this decree. Indeed, Peter was of such authority that Paul wrote in his letter: ‘Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and stayed with him fifteen days’; and again in what follows: ‘After fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus also; and I went up by revelation and set before them the gospel which I preach among the Gentiles,’ showing that he did not have confidence in preaching the gospel unless it had been confirmed by the judgment of Peter and those who were with him. And at once there follows: ‘But privately to those who seemed to be something, lest by any means I should run or had run in vain.’ Why privately and not in public? So that no stumbling block to faith should arise for the believers from among the Jews, who thought that the law was to be kept and that one should believe in the Lord and Saviour in that way. So, at that time too, when Peter had come to Antioch (although the Acts of the Apostles do not record it, Paul must be believed when he affirms it), Paul writes that he withstood him to his face because he was to be blamed. ‘For before certain men came from James, he ate with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. And the other Jews joined him in this, so that even Barnabas was carried away by them into that pretence. But when I saw,’ he says, ‘that they were not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live as the Gentiles do and not as the Jews, how do you compel the Gentiles to live as Jews?”’ and so on. No one, then, doubts that the apostle Peter was the first author of the very rule which he is now accused of transgressing. The cause of the transgression was fear of the Jews; for the Scripture says that at first he ate with the Gentiles, but when certain men came from James, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. He feared the Jews, whose apostle he was, lest on account of the Gentiles they should fall away from faith in Christ, and lest he, an imitator of the good shepherd, should lose the flock entrusted to him.

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:1: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- John 10:11: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gal 1:18; 2:1–2, 2:11–14; allusion to John 10:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.8 (CSEL 34.2:294–296; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-8).

## Letter 75.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:296–298
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome points out that Paul himself circumcised Timothy and shaved his head under a vow, and so should pardon Peter.

### Latin text

Sicut igitur ostendimus Petrum bene quidem sensisse de abolitione legis Mosaicae, sed ad simulationem obseruandae eius timore compulsum, uideamus, an ipse Paulus, qui alium arguit, tale quid fecerit. legimus in eodem libro: Perambulabat autem Paulus Syriam et Ciliciam confirmans ecclesias peruenitque in Derben et Lystram. et ecce discipulus quidam erat ibi nomine Timotheus, filius mulieris Iudaeae fidelis patre gentili. huic testimonium reddebant, qui in Lystris erant et Iconio fratres. hunc uoluit Paulus secum proficisci et adsumens circumcidit eum propter Iudaeos, qui erant in illis locis; sciebant enim omnes, quod pater eius gentilis esset. o beate apostole Paule, qui in Petro reprehenderas simulationem, quare se subtraxisset a gentibus propter metum Iudaeorum, qui a Iacobo uenerant, cur Timotheum, filium hominis gentilis utique et ipsum gentilem — neque enim Iudaeus erat, qui non fuerat circumcisus —, contra sententiam tuam circumcidere cogeris? respondebis mihi: Propter Iudaeos, qui erant in illis locis. qui igitur tibi ignoscis in circumcisione discipuli uenientis ex gentibus, ignosce et Petro, praecessori tuo, quod aliqua fecerit metu fidelium Iudaeorum. rursum scriptum est: Paulus uero cum adhuc sustinuisset dies multos, fratribus uale dicens nauigauit Syriam et cum eo Priscilla et Aquila et totondit sibi in Cenchris caput; uotum enim habuerat. esto, ut ibi Iudaeorum timore compulsus sit facere, quod nolebat: quare comam nutriuit ex uoto et postea eam in Cenchris totondit ex lege, quod Nazaraei, qui se deo uouerint, iuxta praecepta Moysi facere consuerunt?

### English translation (Claude)

As we have shown, then, that Peter rightly understood the abolition of the law of Moses but was driven by fear to pretend to observe it, let us see whether Paul himself, who censured another, did anything of the kind. We read in the same book: ‘Paul went through Syria and Cilicia, confirming the churches, and came to Derbe and Lystra. And behold, a certain disciple was there named Timothy, the son of a believing Jewish woman, but his father was a Gentile. The brethren at Lystra and Iconium bore witness to him. Paul wanted him to go with him, and took him and circumcised him because of the Jews who were in those places; for they all knew that his father was a Gentile.’ O blessed apostle Paul, who had rebuked Peter’s pretence, because he had withdrawn from the Gentiles for fear of the Jews who had come from James, why are you compelled, against your own judgment, to circumcise Timothy, the son of a Gentile man and certainly himself a Gentile (for one who had not been circumcised was not a Jew)? You will answer me: ‘Because of the Jews who were in those places.’ You who pardon yourself for circumcising a disciple who came from the Gentiles, pardon Peter also, your predecessor, for doing certain things out of fear of the believing Jews. Again it is written: ‘But Paul, having stayed many days more, took leave of the brethren and sailed for Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; and he had his head shorn at Cenchreae, for he had a vow.’ Granted that there he was compelled by fear of the Jews to do what he did not wish: why did he let his hair grow by a vow, and afterwards shave it at Cenchreae according to the law, as the Nazirites who had vowed themselves to God were accustomed to do according to the precepts of Moses?

### Scripture references

- Acts 15:41: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 16:1: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 16:3: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 18:18: quotation, high confidence
- Num 6:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Acts 15:41–16:3; 18:18; allusion to Num 6:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.9 (CSEL 34.2:296–298; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-9).

## Letter 75.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:298–300
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome cites Paul’s purification and offering in the temple at James’s advice as a further pretence for the sake of the Jewish believers.

### Latin text

Verum haec ad comparationem eius rei, quae sequitur, parua sunt. refert Lucas, sacrae scriptor historiae: Cum uenissemus Hierosolymam, libenter exceperunt nos fratres et sequenti die Iacobus et omnes seniores, qui cum eo erant, euangelio illius comprobato dixerunt ei: Vides, frater, quot milia sunt in Iudaea, qui crediderunt in Christo et hi omnes aemulatores legis. audierunt autem de te, quia discessionem doces a Moyse eorum, qui per gentes sunt, Iudaeorum dicens non debere circumcidere eos filios suos neque secundum consuetudinem ingredi. quid ergo est? utique oportet conuenire multitudinem; audient enim te superuenisse. hoc ergo fac, quod tibi dicimus. sunt nobis uiri quattuor uotum habentes super se; his adsumptis sanctifica te cum ipsis et inpende in eos, ut radant capita, et scient omnes, quia, quae de te audierunt, falsa sunt, sed ambulas et ipse custodiens legem. tunc Paulus adsumptis uiris postera die purificatus cum illis intrauit in templum adnuntians expletionem dierum purificationis, donec offerretur pro unoquoque eorum oblatio. o Paule, et in hoc te rursum interrogo, cur caput raseris, cur nudipedalia exercueris de caeremoniis Iudaeorum, cur obtuleris sacrificia et secundum legem hostiae pro te fuerint immolatae. utique respondebis: Ne scandalizarentur, qui ex Iudaeis crediderant. simulasti ergo Iudaeum, ut Iudaeos lucrifaceres, et hanc ipsam simulationem Iacobus te et ceteri docuere presbyteri. sed tamen euadere non potuisti: orta enim seditione cum occidendus esses, raptus es a tribuno et ab eo missus Caesaream sub custodia militum diligenti, ne te Iudaei quasi simulatorem ac destructorem legis occiderent, atque inde Romam perueniens in hospitio, quod tibi conduxeras, Christum et Iudaeis et gentibus praedicasti et sententia tua Neronis gladio confirmata est.

### English translation (Claude)

But these things are small compared with what follows. Luke, the writer of the sacred history, relates: ‘When we had come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. And on the following day James and all the elders who were with him, having approved his gospel, said to him: “You see, brother, how many thousands there are in Judea who have believed in Christ, and they are all zealous for the law. And they have heard about you, that you teach the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children nor walk according to the custom. What then? The multitude must certainly come together, for they will hear that you have come. Do therefore what we tell you. We have four men who have a vow on them; take them, purify yourself with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads; and all will know that what they have heard about you is false, but that you yourself also walk keeping the law.” Then Paul took the men, and the next day, having been purified with them, he entered the temple, announcing the fulfilment of the days of purification, until the offering should be made for each one of them.’ O Paul, here too I ask you again: why did you shave your head, why did you go barefoot according to the ceremonies of the Jews, why did you offer sacrifices, and why were victims slain for you according to the law? You will certainly answer: ‘So that those of the Jews who had believed should not be offended.’ You pretended, then, to be a Jew in order to gain the Jews; and this very pretence James and the other presbyters taught you. Yet you could not escape: for when a riot arose and you were about to be killed, you were snatched away by the tribune and sent by him to Caesarea under a careful military guard, lest the Jews should kill you as a pretender and destroyer of the law; and from there coming to Rome, in the lodging you had rented you preached Christ to Jews and Gentiles, and your teaching was confirmed by Nero’s sword.

### Scripture references

- Acts 21:17: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:20: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:24: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:26: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:20: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 23:23: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 28:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Acts 21:17–26; allusions to Acts 21:31–23:33; 28:30–31; 1 Cor 9:20. ‘Went barefoot’ (nudipedalia) is Jerome’s description of the rite, not in Acts.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.10 (CSEL 34.2:298–300; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-10).

## Letter 75.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:300–301
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome concludes that Peter and Paul both pretended to keep the law, defends the older interpretation as an honourable arrangement rather than a lie, and challenges Augustine to do better.

### Latin text

Didicimus, quod propter metum Iudaeorum et Petrus et Paulus aequaliter finxerint legis se praecepta seruare. qua igitur fronte, qua audacia potest id Paulus in altero reprehendere, quod ipse commisit? ego, immo alii ante me exposuerunt causam, quam putauerant, non officiosum mendacium defendentes, sicut tu scribis, sed docentes honestam dispensationem, ut et apostolorum prudentiam demonstrarent et blasphemantis Porphyrii inpudentiam cohercerent, qui Paulum et Petrum puerili dicit inter se pugnasse certamine, immo exarsisse Paulum in inuidiam uirtutum Petri et ea scripsisse iactanter, uel quae non fecerit uel, si fecit, procaciter fecerit in alio reprehendens, quod ipse commiserit. interpretati sunt illi, ut potuerunt; tu quo modo istum locum edisseres? utique meliora dicturus, qui ueterum sententiam reprobasti.

### English translation (Claude)

We have learned that out of fear of the Jews both Peter and Paul alike pretended to keep the precepts of the law. With what face, then, with what boldness can Paul rebuke in another what he himself committed? I, or rather others before me, have set out the explanation they thought right, not defending a dutiful lie, as you write, but teaching an honourable arrangement, so as both to show the prudence of the apostles and to restrain the impudence of the blasphemer Porphyry, who says that Paul and Peter fought with each other in a childish contest; nay, that Paul blazed up in envy of Peter’s virtues and wrote boastfully things which either he did not do, or, if he did them, he did insolently, rebuking in another what he himself committed. They interpreted as they could; how will you expound this passage? You will certainly say something better, since you have rejected the opinion of the ancients.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Porphyry, Porphyry, Chr. (Porphyry, Against the Christians (fragments)): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- ‘Dutiful lie’ (officiosum mendacium) is Augustine’s phrase for the view he rejects; ‘arrangement’ renders dispensatio.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.11 (CSEL 34.2:300–301; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-11).

## Letter 75.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:301–303
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome quotes Augustine’s view that Paul kept the Jewish rites as harmless for Jewish believers and summarizes his argument about Peter’s fault.

### Latin text

Scribis ad me in epistula: Neque enim a me docendus es, quo modo intellegatur, quod idem dicit: Factus sum Iudaeis tamquam Iudaeus, ut Iudaeos lucrifacerem et cetera, quae ibi dicuntur compassione misericordi, non simulatione fallaci. fit enim tamquam aegrotus, qui ministrat aegroto, non cum se febres habere mentitur, sed cum animo condolentis cogitat, quem ad modum sibi seruiri uellet, si ipse aegrotaret. nam utique Iudaeus erat, Christianus autem factus non Iudaeorum sacramenta reliquerat, quae conuenienter ille populus et legitime tempore, quo oportebat, acceperat. ideoque suscepit ea celebranda, cum iam Christi esset apostolus, ut doceret non esse perniciosa his, qui ea uellent. sicut a parentibus per legem acceperant, custodire, etiam cum in Christum credidissent, non tamen in eis iam constituerent spem salutis, quoniam per dominum Iesum salus ipsa, quae illis sacramentis significabatur, aduenerat. totius sermonis tui, quem disputatione longissima protraxisti, hic sensus est, ut Petrus non errauerit in eo, quod his, qui ex Iudaeis crediderant, putauerit legem esse seruandam, sed in eo a recti linea deuiarit, quod gentes cogeret iudaizare, cogeret autem non docentis imperio sed conuersationis exemplo; et Paulus non contraria sit locutus his, quae ipse gesserat. sed quare Petrus eos, qui ex gentibus erant, iudaizare compelleret.

### English translation (Claude)

You write to me in your letter: ‘For you do not need to be taught by me how we are to understand what the same apostle says, “To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews,” and the other things said there out of merciful compassion, not deceitful pretence. For he who nurses a sick man becomes as one sick, not when he falsely claims to have a fever, but when, with a sympathizing mind, he considers how he would wish to be served if he himself were sick. For Paul was indeed a Jew; and when he became a Christian he had not abandoned the sacraments of the Jews, which that people had received fittingly and lawfully at the time when it was right. And so he undertook to celebrate them when he was already an apostle of Christ, to teach that they were not harmful to those who wished to keep them as they had received them from their parents through the law, even after they had believed in Christ, provided that they no longer placed in them their hope of salvation, since the very salvation which those sacraments signified had come through the Lord Jesus.’ The sense of your whole discourse, which you drew out in a very long discussion, is this: that Peter did not err in thinking that the law was to be kept by those who had believed from among the Jews, but that he swerved from the straight line in this, that he compelled the Gentiles to live as Jews, compelling them not by the command of one who teaches but by the example of his conduct; and that Paul did not say anything contrary to what he himself had done, but asked why Peter compelled those who were from the Gentiles to live as Jews.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 40.4. Quotation of 1 Cor 9:20; allusion to Gal 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.12 (CSEL 34.2:301–303; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-12).

## Letter 75.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:303–304
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome argues that Augustine’s view revives the heresy of the Ebionites and Nazarenes, who mixed the law with the gospel.

### Latin text

Haec ergo summa est quaestionis, immo sententiae tuae, ut post euangelium Christi bene faciant credentes Iudaei, si legis mandata custodiant, hoc est si sacrificia offerant, quae obtulit Paulus, si filios circumcidant, si sabbatum seruent, ut Paulus in Timotheo et omnes obseruauere Iudaei. si hoc uerum est, in Cerinthi et Hebionis haeresin delabimur, qui credentes in Christo propter hoc solum a parentibus anathematizati sunt, quod legis caeremonias Christi euangelio miscuerunt et sic noua confessi sunt, ut uetera non amitterent. quid dicam de Hebionitis, qui Christianos esse se simulant? usque hodie per totas orientis synagogas inter Iudaeos haeresis est, quae dicitur Minaeorum et a Pharisaeis huc usque damnatur, quos uulgo Nazaraeos nuncupant, qui credunt in Christum filium dei natum de Maria uirgine et eum dicunt esse, qui sub Pontio Pilato et passus est et resurrexit, in quem et nos credimus. sed dum uolunt et Iudaei esse et Christiani, nec Iudaei sunt nec Christiani. oro ergo te, ut, qui nostro uulnusculo medendum putas, quod acu foratum. immo punctum dicitur, huius sententiae medearis uulneri. quod lancea et, ut ita dicam, phalaricae mole percussum est. neque enim eiusdem est criminis in explanatione scripturarum diuersas maiorum sententias ponere et haeresin sceleratissimam rursus in ecclesiam introducere. sin autem haec nobis incumbit necessitas, ut Iudaeos cum legitimis suis suscipiamus. et licebit eis obseruare in ecclesiis Christi, quod exercuerunt in synagogis satanae, — dicam, quod sentio — non illi Christiani fient, sed nos Iudaeos facient.

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, is the sum of the question, or rather of your opinion: that after the gospel of Christ the believing Jews do well if they keep the commandments of the law, that is, if they offer the sacrifices which Paul offered, if they circumcise their sons, if they keep the sabbath, as Paul did in the case of Timothy and as all the Jews observed. If this is true, we slide into the heresy of Cerinthus and Ebion, who, though believing in Christ, were anathematized by our fathers for this alone, that they mixed the ceremonies of the law with the gospel of Christ, and so confessed the new as not to give up the old. What shall I say of the Ebionites, who pretend to be Christians? To this day there is in all the synagogues of the East, among the Jews, a heresy which is called that of the Minaeans and is condemned by the Pharisees to this day; they are commonly called Nazarenes; they believe in Christ, the Son of God, born of the Virgin Mary, and say that he is the one who suffered under Pontius Pilate and rose again, in whom we also believe. But while they wish to be both Jews and Christians, they are neither Jews nor Christians. I pray you, therefore, you who think our little wound should be healed, which was made with a needle, or rather, as they say, a pinprick, to heal the wound of this opinion of yours, which was struck by a lance and, so to speak, by the weight of a siege javelin. For it is not the same offence to set out the differing opinions of our elders in explaining the Scriptures and to bring back into the church a most wicked heresy. But if this necessity lies upon us, that we receive the Jews together with their legal observances, and they are allowed to practise in the churches of Christ what they practised in the synagogues of Satan, I will say what I think: they will not become Christians, but they will make us Jews.

### Scripture references

- Rev 2:9: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Polemical passage; translated as written. ‘Synagogues of Satan’ echoes Rev 2:9; 3:9. The Minaeans (Hebrew minim) and Nazarenes were Jewish-Christian groups.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.13 (CSEL 34.2:303–304; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-13).

## Letter 75.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:304–308
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome insists that the Jewish ceremonies are deadly to all Christians, Jewish or Gentile, citing the Gospels, Jeremiah, Paul, and Ezekiel.

### Latin text

Quis enim hoc Christianorum patienter audiat, quod in tua epistula continetur: Iudaeus erat Paulus, Christianus autem factus non Iudaeorum sacramenta reliquerat, quae conuenienter ille populus et legitime tempore, quo oportebat, acceperat. ideoque suscepit ea celebranda, cum iam Christi esset apostolus. ut doceret non esse perniciosa his, qui ea uellent, sicut a parentibus per legem acceperant, custodire. rursum obsecro te, ut pace tua meum dolorem audias. Iudaeorum Paulus caeremonias obseruabat, cum iam Christi esset apostolus, et dicis eas non esse perniciosas his, qui eas uelint, sicut a parentibus acceperint, custodire. ego e contrario loquar et reclamante mundo libera uoce pronuntiem caeremonias Iudaeorum et perniciosas esse et mortiferas Christianis et, quicumque eas obseruauerit siue ex Iudaeis siue ex gentibus, eum in barathrum diaboli deuolutum. finis enim legis Christus est ad iustitiam omni credenti, Iudaeo scilicet atque gentili; neque enim omni credenti erit finis ad iustitiam, si Iudaeus excipitur. et in euangelio legimus: Lex et prophetae usque ad Iohannem Baptistam, et in alio loco: Propterea ergo magis quaerebant eum Iudaei interficere, quia non solum soluebat sabbatum. sed et patrem suum dicebat deum aequalem se faciens deo, et iterum: De plenitudine eius nos omnes accepimus et gratiam pro gratia, quia lex per Moysen data est, gratia et ueritas per Iesum Christum facta est. pro legis gratia. quae praeteriit, gratiam euangelii accepimus permanentem et pro umbris et imaginibus ueteris instrumenti ueritas per Iesum Christum facta est. Hieremias quoque ex persona dei uaticinatur: Ecce dies ueniunt, dicit dominus, et consummabo domui Israhel et domui Iuda testamentum nouum non secundum testamentum. quod disposui patribus eorum in die. quando adprehendi manum eorum, ut educerem eos de terra Aegypti. obserua, quid dicat, quod non populo gentilium. cum quo ante non fecerat testamentum, sed populo Iudaeorum, cui legem dederat per Moysen, testamentum nouum euangelii repromittat, ut nequaquam uiuant in uetustate litterae sed in nouitate spiritus. Paulus autem, super cuius nomine nunc quaestio uentilatur, crebras huiusce modi ponit sententias, e quibus breuitatis studio pauca subnectam: Ecce ego Paulus dico uobis, quoniam, si circumcidamini, Christus uobis nihil prodest, et iterum: Euacuati estis a Christo, qui in lege iustificamini; a gratia excidistis, et infra: Si spiritu ducimini, iam non estis sub lege. ex quo apparet, qui sub lege est non dispensatiue, ut nostri uoluere maiores, sed uere, ut tu intellegis, eum sanctum spiritum non habere. qualia sint autem praecepta legalia, deo docente discamus: Ego, inquit, dedi eis praecepta non bona et iustificationes, in quibus non uiuant in eis. haec dicimus, non quo legem iuxta Manichaeum et Marcionem destruamus, quam et sanctam et spiritalem iuxta apostolum nouimus, sed quod, postquam fides uenit et temporum plenitudo, misit deus filium suum factum ex muliere, factum sub lege, ut eos, qui sub lege erant, redimeret, ut adoptionem filiorum reciperemus et nequaquam sub paedagogo sed sub adulto et domino et herede uiuamus.

### English translation (Claude)

For what Christian could patiently hear what your letter contains: ‘Paul was a Jew; and when he became a Christian he had not abandoned the sacraments of the Jews, which that people had received fittingly and lawfully at the time when it was right. And so he undertook to celebrate them when he was already an apostle of Christ, to teach that they were not harmful to those who wished to keep them as they had received them from their parents through the law’? Again I beseech you to hear my grief without taking offence. Paul observed the ceremonies of the Jews when he was already an apostle of Christ, and you say that they are not harmful to those who wish to keep them as they received them from their parents! I, on the contrary, will say, and though the world cry out against me I will declare with a free voice, that the ceremonies of the Jews are both harmful and deadly to Christians, and that whoever observes them, whether from the Jews or from the Gentiles, has fallen headlong into the devil’s pit. ‘For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes,’ that is, to Jew and Gentile; for he will not be the end for righteousness to everyone who believes if the Jew is excepted. And in the Gospel we read, ‘The law and the prophets were until John the Baptist’; and in another place, ‘For this reason the Jews sought all the more to kill him, because he not only broke the sabbath but also called God his own Father, making himself equal with God’; and again, ‘Of his fullness we have all received, grace for grace; for the law was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.’ In place of the grace of the law, which has passed away, we have received the abiding grace of the gospel, and in place of the shadows and images of the old instrument, truth came through Jesus Christ. Jeremiah too prophesies in the person of God: ‘Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will accomplish for the house of Israel and the house of Judah a new covenant, not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt.’ Notice what he says: that he promises the new covenant of the gospel not to the people of the Gentiles, with whom he had not previously made a covenant, but to the people of the Jews, to whom he had given the law through Moses, so that they should no longer live in the oldness of the letter but in the newness of the Spirit. And Paul, about whose name the question is now being argued, sets down frequent statements of this kind, of which, for brevity’s sake, I shall add a few: ‘Behold, I Paul say to you that if you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing’; and again, ‘You are cut off from Christ, you who are justified by the law; you have fallen from grace’; and below, ‘If you are led by the Spirit, you are no longer under the law.’ From this it is clear that one who is under the law, not by arrangement, as our elders held, but truly, as you understand it, does not have the Holy Spirit. And what kind of precepts the legal precepts are, let us learn from God himself: ‘I gave them,’ he says, ‘precepts that were not good, and ordinances by which they shall not live.’ We say this, not that we may destroy the law, as Mani and Marcion do, for we know, with the apostle, that it is both holy and spiritual; but because, after faith came and the fullness of times, ‘God sent his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons,’ and live no longer under a tutor, but under the grown heir who is lord.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:4: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Jer 31:31 (38:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 5:2: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:4: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 20:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:25: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Polemical and doctrinally sensitive; translated as written. Quotations: Rom 10:4; Luke 16:16 (cf. Matt 11:13); John 5:18; John 1:16–17; Jer 31:31–32 (LXX 38:31–32); Gal 5:2, 5:4, 5:18; Ezek 20:25; Gal 4:4–5; allusions to Rom 7:6, 7:12, 14; Gal 3:24–25; 4:1–2. The editor’s text has a stray ‘11’ in the Ezekiel quotation, omitted.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.14 (CSEL 34.2:304–308; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-14).

## Letter 75.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:308–310
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome challenges Augustine to let a converted Jew keep circumcision, sabbath, food laws, and Passover, and quotes Augustine’s account of the Jews’ ‘evil’ that Paul abandoned.

### Latin text

Sequitur in epistula tua: Non ideo Petrum emendauit. quod paternas traditiones obseruaret, quod si facere uellet. nec mendaciter nec incongrue faceret iterum dico: episcopus es ecclesiarum Christi magister; ut probes uerum esse. quod adseris, suscipe aliquem Iudaeorum, qui factus Christianus natum sibi filium circumcidat, qui obseruet sabbata. qui abstineat se a cibis. quos deus creauit ad utendum cum gratiarum actione, qui quarta decima die mensis primi agnum mactet ad uesperam, et. cum hoc feceris, immo non feceris — scio enim te Christianum et rem sacrilegam non esse facturum —, uelis nolis tuam sententiam reprobabis et tunc disces opere difficilius esse confirmare sua quam aliena reprehendere. ac ne forsitan tibi non crederemus, immo non intellegeremus, quid diceres — frequenter enim in longum sermo protractus caret intellegentia et, dum non sentitur, ab inperitis minus reprehenditur —, inculcas et replicas: Hoc ergo Iudaeorum Paulus dimiserat, quod malum habebant. quod est malum Iudaeorum, quod Paulus dimiserat? utique illud, quod sequitur, quod ignorantes, inquit, dei iustitiam et suam iustitiam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti; deinde quod post passionem et resurrectionem Christi dato ac manifestato sacramento gratiae secundum ordinem Melchisedech adhuc putabant uetera sacramenta non ex consuetudine sollemnitatis sed ex necessitate salutis esse celebranda, quae tamen si numquam fuissent necessaria, infructuose atque inaniter pro eis Machabaei martyres fierent; postremo illud, quod praedicatores gratiae Christianos Iudaei tamquam hostes legis persequerentur. hos atque eius modi errores et uitia dicit se damna et stercora arbitratum, ut Christum lucrifaceret.

### English translation (Claude)

There follows in your letter: ‘He did not correct Peter for observing the traditions of his fathers; if he wished to do so, he would do it neither deceitfully nor unfittingly.’ Again I say: you are a bishop, a teacher of the churches of Christ. To prove that what you assert is true, take some Jew who, having become a Christian, circumcises a son born to him, keeps the sabbaths, abstains from foods which God created to be used with thanksgiving, and slays a lamb at evening on the fourteenth day of the first month; and when you have done this, or rather not done it (for I know you are a Christian and will not do a sacrilegious thing), willing or not you will reject your own opinion, and then you will learn by experience that it is harder to establish one’s own views than to criticize those of others. And lest perhaps we should not believe you, or rather not understand what you were saying (for a discourse drawn out at length often lacks clarity and, not being understood, is less criticized by the unskilled), you press it home and repeat it: ‘This, then, Paul had left behind of the Jews’ ways, which was evil.’ What is the evil of the Jews which Paul had left behind? Surely what follows: ‘that, being ignorant,’ he says, ‘of God’s righteousness and seeking to establish their own righteousness, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God’; next, that after the passion and resurrection of Christ, when the sacrament of grace according to the order of Melchizedek had been given and revealed, they still thought that the old sacraments were to be celebrated, not out of custom and solemn usage, but as necessary to salvation (and yet, had they never been necessary, the Maccabees would have become martyrs for them fruitlessly and in vain); lastly, that the Jews persecuted the Christian preachers of grace as enemies of the law. These and similar errors and vices, he says, he counted as loss and dung, that he might gain Christ.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 5:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:8: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 6–7 (2 Maccabees): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 40.4–6. Allusions: 1 Tim 4:3; Exod 12:6; Rom 10:3 (quoted within Augustine’s words); Ps 110:4 / Heb 5:6 (Melchizedek); Phil 3:8. The Maccabean martyrs: 2 Macc 6–7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.15 (CSEL 34.2:308–310; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-15).

## Letter 75.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:310–312
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome denies that the law’s ceremonies can be kept ‘without necessity for salvation’, since they are either good or evil, and accuses Augustine of falling into the Ebionite error.

### Latin text

Didicimus per te, quae apostolus Paulus mala reliquerit Iudaeorum; rursum te docente discamus, quae bona eorum tenuerit. obseruationes, inquis, legis, quas more patrio celebrabant, sicut ab ipso Paulo celebratae sunt sine ulla salutis necessitate. quid uelis dicere sine ulla salutis necessitate, non satis intellego. si enim salutem non adferunt, cur obseruantur? si autem obseruanda sunt, utique salutem adferunt, maxime quae seruata martyres faciunt. non enim obseruarentur, nisi adferrent salutem. neque enim indifferentia sunt inter bonum et malum, sicut philosophi disputant: bonum est continentia, malum luxuria, inter utrumque indifferens ambulare, digerere alui stercora, capitis naribus purgamenta proicere, sputa rheumatis iacere; hoc nec bonum nec malum est; siue enim feceris siue non feceris, nec iustitiam habebis nec iniustitiam. obseruare autem legis caeremonias non potest esse indifferens, sed aut malum est aut bonum est. tu dicis bonum, ego adsero malum et malum non solum his, qui ex gentibus, sed et his, qui ex Iudaico populo crediderunt. in hoc, nisi fallor, loco dum aliud uitas, ad aliud deuolueris. dum enim metuis Porphyrium blasphemantem, in Hebionis incurris laqueos his, qui credunt ex Iudaeis, obseruandam legem esse decernens. et quia periculosum intellegis esse, quod dicis, rursum illud superfluis uerbis temperare conaris: Sine ulla salutis necessitate, sicut Iudaei celebrandas putabant, aut fallaci simulatione, quod in Petro reprehenderat.

### English translation (Claude)

We have learned from you what evils of the Jews the apostle Paul left behind; let us learn again, with you as teacher, what good things of theirs he kept. ‘The observances of the law,’ you say, ‘which they celebrated after the custom of their fathers, as they were celebrated by Paul himself, without any necessity for salvation.’ What you mean by ‘without any necessity for salvation’ I do not well understand. For if they do not bring salvation, why are they observed? But if they are to be observed, they certainly bring salvation, especially since their observance makes martyrs. For they would not be observed unless they brought salvation. Nor are they among the things indifferent between good and evil, as the philosophers argue: self-control is good, self-indulgence evil; between the two is the indifferent: to walk, to void the bowels, to clear the nose, to spit out phlegm; this is neither good nor evil, for whether you do it or not, you will have neither righteousness nor unrighteousness. But to observe the ceremonies of the law cannot be indifferent: it is either evil or good. You say good; I assert evil, and evil not only for those who believed from the Gentiles, but also for those who believed from the Jewish people. In this passage, if I am not mistaken, while you avoid one thing you fall into another. For while you fear the blasphemer Porphyry, you run into the snares of Ebion, ruling that the law is to be observed by those who believe from the Jews. And because you realize that what you say is dangerous, you try again to soften it with superfluous words: ‘without any necessity for salvation, as the Jews thought they must be celebrated, or by deceitful pretence, which he had rebuked in Peter.’

### Extrabiblical texts

- Porphyry, Porphyry, Chr. (Porphyry, Against the Christians (fragments)): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 40.6. ‘Things indifferent’: the Stoic category; no specific source quoted.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.16 (CSEL 34.2:310–312; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-16).

## Letter 75.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:312–314
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome mocks Augustine’s claim that Paul kept the law out of compassion rather than pretence, arguing that both views amount to Paul pretending to be what he was not.

### Latin text

Petrus igitur simulauit legis custodiam, iste autem reprehensor Petri audacter obseruauit legitima; sequitur enim in epistula tua: Nam si propterea illa sacramenta celebrauit. quia simulauit se Iudaeum, ut illos lucrifaceret, cur non etiam sacrificauit cum gentibus, quia et his, qui sine lege erant, tamquam sine lege factus est, ut eos quoque lucrifaceret, nisi quia et illud fecit ut natura Iudaeus et hoc totum dixit, non ut fallaciter se fingeret esse, quod non erat, sed ut misericorditer ita subueniendum esse sentiret, ac si ipse in eo errore laboraret, non scilicet mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu? bene defendis Paulum, quod non simulauerit errorem Iudaeorum, sed uere fuerit in errore neque imitari uoluerit Petrum mentientem, ut, quod erat, metu Iudaeorum dissimularet, sed tota libertate Iudaeum esse se diceret. nouam clementiam apostoli! dum Iudaeos Christianos uult facere, ipse Iudaeus factus est. non enim poterat luxuriosos ad frugalitatem reducere, nisi se luxuriosum probasset, et misericorditer, ut ipse dicis, subuenire miseris, nisi se miserum ipse sentiret. uere enim miselli et misericorditer deplorandi, qui contentione sua et amore legis abolitae apostolum Christi fecere Iudaeum. nec multum interest inter meam et tuam sententiam, quia ego dico et Petrum et Paulum timore fidelium Iudaeorum legis exercuisse, immo simulasse mandata, tu autem adseris hoc eos fecisse clementer non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu, dum modo illud constet uel metu uel misericordia eos simulasse se esse, quod non erant. illud autem argumentum, quo aduersum nos uteris, quod et gentilibus debuerit gentilis fieri, si Iudaeis Iudaeus factus est, magis pro nobis facit. sicut enim non fuit uere Iudaeus. sic nec uere gentilis erat, et sicut non fuit uere gentilis, sic nec uere Iudaeus erat. in eo autem imitator gentilium est. quia praeputium recipit in fide Christi et indifferenter permittit uesci cibis, quos damnant Iudaei. non cultu, ut tu putas, idolorum; in Christo enim Iesu nec circumcisio est aliquid nec praeputium sed obseruatio mandatorum dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Peter, then, pretended to keep the law, but this critic of Peter boldly observed its ordinances! For there follows in your letter: ‘For if he celebrated those sacraments because he pretended to be a Jew in order to gain them, why did he not also sacrifice with the Gentiles, since to those who were without law he also became as without law, that he might gain them too? Was it not because he did the one as a Jew by birth, and said all this, not that he might deceitfully pretend to be what he was not, but because he felt that he must mercifully help them, as if he himself were labouring under that error, that is, not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion?’ A fine defence of Paul you make: that he did not pretend to the error of the Jews but was truly in error, and that he did not wish to imitate the lying Peter by concealing out of fear of the Jews what he was, but said with full freedom that he was a Jew! A new kind of clemency in an apostle! While he wishes to make Jews Christians, he himself became a Jew. For he could not bring the self-indulgent back to frugality unless he proved himself self-indulgent, nor mercifully help the wretched, as you yourself say, unless he felt himself wretched. Truly wretched, and to be mercifully lamented, are those who by their contentiousness and love of an abolished law have made an apostle of Christ a Jew. Nor is there much difference between my opinion and yours: I say that both Peter and Paul, out of fear of the believing Jews, practised, or rather pretended to practise, the commandments of the law; you assert that they did this out of clemency, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion’; provided only that it is agreed that, whether from fear or from mercy, they pretended to be what they were not. And the argument you use against us, that he ought to have become a Gentile to the Gentiles if he became a Jew to the Jews, tells rather in our favour. For just as he was not truly a Jew, so he was not truly a Gentile; and just as he was not truly a Gentile, so he was not truly a Jew. He imitates the Gentiles in this, that he accepts the uncircumcised into the faith of Christ and permits them without distinction to eat foods which the Jews condemn, not, as you think, by the worship of idols; ‘for in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is anything nor uncircumcision, but the keeping of the commandments of God.’

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:19: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 40.6. Allusions to 1 Cor 9:20–21; the closing quotation combines 1 Cor 7:19 and Gal 5:6 / 6:15. Sarcastic in tone; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.17 (CSEL 34.2:312–314; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-17).

## Letter 75.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:314–316
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome asks pardon for his long reply, denies teaching lying, and complains that Augustine’s letters circulate in Italy before reaching him.

### Latin text

Quaeso igitur et te iterum atque iterum deprecor, ut ignoscas disputatiunculae meae et, quod modum meum egressus sum, tibi inputes, qui coegisti, ut rescriberem, et mihi cum Stesichoro oculos abstulisti. nec me putes magistrum esse mendacii, qui sequor Christum dicentem: Ego sum uia et uita et ueritas, nec potest fieri, ut ueritatis cultor mendacio colla submittam, neque mihi inperitorum plebeculam concites, qui te uenerantur ut episcopum et in ecclesia declamantem sacerdotii honore suscipiunt, me autem aetatis ultimae et paene decrepitum ac monasterii et ruris secreta sectantem parui pendunt, et quaeras tibi, quos doceas siue reprehendas. ad nos enim tantis maris atque terrarum a te diuisos spatiis uix uocis tuae sonus peruenit et, si forsitan litteras scripseris, ante eas Italia ac Roma suscipiet, quam ad me, cui mittendae sunt, deferantur.

### English translation (Claude)

I ask you, then, and beg you again and again, to pardon my little disputation, and, since I have gone beyond my usual limit, to blame yourself, who forced me to reply and, as with Stesichorus, took away my eyes. And do not think me a teacher of lying, I who follow Christ when he says, ‘I am the way, and the life, and the truth’; nor can it be that I, a worshipper of the truth, should bow my neck to a lie. Nor stir up against me the crowd of the unlearned, who revere you as a bishop and receive you with the honour due to the priesthood when you preach in church, but think little of me, a man at the end of life and almost decrepit, who seeks the seclusion of a monastery and the countryside; and look for others to teach or rebuke. For to us, separated from you by such great stretches of sea and land, the sound of your voice scarcely reaches; and if perhaps you write letters, Italy and Rome will receive them before they are delivered to me, to whom they are to be sent.

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Stesichorus (Stesichorus): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Stesichorus was said to have been struck blind for slandering Helen (cf. Plato, Phaedrus 243a); the allusion is uncertain in sense. Quotation of John 14:6 (in Jerome’s order, ‘way, life, truth’).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.18 (CSEL 34.2:314–316; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-18).

## Letter 75.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:316–317
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome explains the asterisks and obeli of his earlier translation from the Hexaplaric Septuagint and defends his new translation from the Hebrew.

### Latin text

Quod autem in aliis quaeris epistulis, cur mea prior in libris canonicis interpretatio asteriscos habeat et uirgulas praenotatas et postea aliam translationem absque his signis ediderim, pace tua dixerim, uideris mihi non intellegere, quod quaesisti. illa enim interpretatio septuaginta interpretum est et, ubicumque uirgulae, id est obeli sunt, significatur, quod septuaginta plus dixerint, quam habetur in Hebraeo, ubi autem asterisci, id est stellae praelucentes, ex Theodotionis editione ab Origene additum est; et ibi Graeca transtulimus, hic de ipso Hebraico, quod intellegebamus, expressimus sensuum potius ueritatem quam uerborum interdum ordinem conseruantes. et miror, quo modo septuaginta interpretum libros legas non puros, ut ab eis editi sunt, sed ab Origene emendatos siue corruptos per obelos et asteriscos et Christiani hominis interpretatiunculam non sequaris, praesertim cum ea, quae addita sunt, ex hominis Iudaei atque blasphemi post passionem Christi editione transtulerit. uis amator esse uerus septuaginta interpretum, non legas ea, quae sub asteriscis sunt, immo rade de uoluminibus, ut ueterum te fautorem probes. quod si feceris, omnes ecclesiarum bibliothecas condemnare cogeris. uix enim unus aut alter inuenietur liber, qui ista non habeat.

### English translation (Claude)

As for your question in other letters, why my earlier translation of the canonical books has asterisks and small strokes marked in it, and why I afterwards published another translation without these signs, with your leave I would say that you do not seem to me to understand what you asked. For that earlier translation is that of the Seventy translators; and wherever there are small strokes, that is, obeli, it is indicated that the Seventy said more than is found in the Hebrew; but where there are asterisks, that is, shining stars, something has been added by Origen from the edition of Theodotion. There I translated from the Greek; here I rendered from the Hebrew itself what I understood, preserving the truth of the sense rather than, at times, the order of the words. And I wonder how you read the books of the Seventy translators not pure, as they were published by them, but emended, or corrupted, by Origen with obeli and asterisks, and do not follow the little translation of a Christian man, especially since Origen translated what was added from the edition of a Jew and a blasphemer, published after the passion of Christ. Do you wish to be a true lover of the Seventy translators? Do not read what is under the asterisks; nay, scrape it out of the volumes, to show yourself a supporter of the ancients. But if you do this, you will be forced to condemn all the libraries of the churches; for scarcely one or two books will be found that do not have these passages.

### Translation notes

- Theodotion is called ‘a Jew and a blasphemer’ by Jerome; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.19 (CSEL 34.2:316–317; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-19).

## Letter 75.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:317–320
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome turns Augustine’s dilemma about the Septuagint against Augustine’s own commentary on the Psalms and defends his translation from the Hebrew.

### Latin text

Porro quod dicis non debuisse me interpretari post ueteres et nouo uteris syllogismo: Aut obscura fuerunt, quae interpretati sunt septuaginta, aut manifesta; si obscura, te quoque in eis falli potuisse credendum est, si manifesta, illos in eis falli non potuisse perspicuum est, tuo tibi sermone respondeo. omnes ueteres tractatores, qui nos in domino praecesserunt et qui scripturas sanctas interpretati sunt, aut obscura interpretati sunt aut manifesta. si obscura, quo modo tu post eos ausus es disserere, quod illi explanare non potuerunt? si manifesta, superfluum est te uoluisse disserere, quod illos latere non potuit maxime in explanatione psalmorum, quos apud Graecos interpretati sunt multis uoluminibus primus Origenes. secundus Eusebius Caesariensis, tertius Theodorus Heracleotes, quartus Asterius Scythopolita, quintus Apollinaris Laodicenus. sextus Didymus Alexandrinus. feruntur et diuersorum in paucos psalmos opuscula, sed nunc de integro psalmorum corpore dicimus. apud Latinos autem Hilarius Pictauensis et Eusebius Vercellensis episcopus Origenem et Eusebium transtulerunt, quorum priorem et noster Ambrosius in quibusdam secutus est. respondeat mihi prudentia tua, quare post tantos et tales interpretes in explanatione psalmorum diuersa senseris. si enim obscuri sunt psalmi, te quoque in eis falli potuisse credendum est, si manifesti, illos in eis falli potuisse non creditur. ac per hoc utroque modo superflua erit interpretatio tua et hac lege post priores nullus loqui audebit et. quodcumque alius occupauerit, alius de eo scribendi licentiam non habebit. quin potius humanitatis tuae est, in quo ueniam tibi tribuis, indulgere et ceteris. ego enim non tantum uetera abolere conatus sum, quae linguae meae hominibus emendata de Graeco in Latinum transtuli, quam ea testimonia, quae a Iudaeis praetermissa sunt uel corrupta. proferre in medium, ut scirent nostri, quid Hebraea ueritas contineret. si cui legere non placet, nemo compellit inuitum. bibat uinum uetus cum suauitate et nostra musta contemnat, quae in explanatione priorum edita sunt, ut, sicubi illa non intelleguntur, ex nostris manifestiora fiant. quod autem genus interpretationis in scripturis sanctis sequendum sit, liber, quem scripsi de optimo genere interpretandi, et omnes praefatiunculae diuinorum uoluminum, quas editioni nostrae praeposuimus, explicant ad illasque prudentem lectorem remittendum puto. et si me, ut dicis, in noui testamenti emendatione suscipis exponisque causam, cur suscipias. quia plurimi linguae Graecae habentes scientiam de meo possent opere iudicare, eandem integritatem debueras etiam in ueteri credere testamento, quod non nostra confinximus. sed, ut apud Hebraeos inuenimus, diuina transtulimus. sicubi dubitas, Hebraeos interroga.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, you say that I ought not to have translated after the ancients, and you use a new syllogism: ‘What the Seventy translated was either obscure or clear; if obscure, it must be believed that you too could have been mistaken in it; if clear, it is evident that they could not have been mistaken in it.’ I answer you in your own words. All the ancient commentators who went before us in the Lord and who interpreted the holy Scriptures interpreted either what was obscure or what was clear. If obscure, how did you dare after them to discuss what they could not explain? If clear, it is superfluous for you to have wished to discuss what could not have escaped them, especially in the explanation of the Psalms, which among the Greeks were interpreted in many volumes, first by Origen, second by Eusebius of Caesarea, third by Theodore of Heraclea, fourth by Asterius of Scythopolis, fifth by Apollinaris of Laodicea, sixth by Didymus of Alexandria. There are also said to be short works of various authors on a few Psalms, but I am speaking now of the whole body of the Psalms. Among the Latins, Hilary of Poitiers and Bishop Eusebius of Vercelli translated Origen and Eusebius, and our Ambrose too followed the former in some places. Let your Prudence answer me why, after so many and such great interpreters, you have held different views in explaining the Psalms. For if the Psalms are obscure, it must be believed that you too could have been mistaken in them; if clear, it is not believed that they could have been mistaken in them. And so in either case your interpretation will be superfluous; and by this rule no one will dare to speak after his predecessors, and whatever one has taken up, another will not have leave to write about it. Rather, it befits your kindness to grant to others too the indulgence you grant yourself. For I have tried not so much to abolish the old things, which I corrected and translated from Greek into Latin for the people of my own language, as to bring forward the testimonies which have been omitted or corrupted by the Jews, so that our people might know what the Hebrew truth contains. If anyone does not like to read it, no one compels him against his will. Let him drink the old wine with pleasure and despise our new wine, which was published to explain the earlier versions, so that wherever they are not understood they may be made clearer by ours. What kind of translation should be followed in the holy Scriptures is explained by the book I wrote, ‘On the Best Kind of Translation’, and by all the little prefaces to the divine books which I placed before my edition; to these I think the prudent reader should be referred. And if, as you say, you accept me in my emendation of the New Testament, and give as the reason for accepting it that very many who know Greek could judge my work, you ought to have believed in the same integrity in the Old Testament too, for I did not invent anything of my own, but translated the divine words as I found them among the Hebrews. Wherever you are in doubt, ask the Hebrews.

### Scripture references

- Luke 5:39: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 28.2. ‘On the Best Kind of Translation’ is Jerome’s Ep. 57. Allusion to Luke 5:39. The printed ‘11011’ is a digitization slip for non.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.20 (CSEL 34.2:317–320; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-20).

## Letter 75.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:320–322
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome quotes Augustine’s story of the riot at Oea over his rendering in Jonah.

### Latin text

Dices: Quid, si Hebraei aut respondere noluerint aut mentiri uoluerint? tota frequentia Iudaeorum in mea interpretatione reticebit, nullus si inueniri poterit, qui Hebraeae linguae habeat notitiam, aut omnes imitabuntur illos Iudaeos. quos dicis in Africae repertos oppidulo in meam calumniam conspirasse? huiusce modi enim in epistula tua texis fabulam: Quidam frater noster episcopus cum lectitari instituisset in ecclesia, cui praeest, interpretationem tuam, mouit quiddam longe aliter a te positum apud Ionam prophetam, quam erat omnium sensibus memoriaeque inueteratum et tot aetatum successionibus decantatum. factus est tantus tumultus in plebe maxime Graecis arguentibus et inflammantibus calumniam falsitatis, ut cogeretur episcopus — Oea quippe ciuitas erat — Iudaeorum testimonium flagitare. utrum autem illi inperitia an malitia hoc esse in Hebraeis codicibus responderunt, quod et Graeci et Latini habebant atque dicebant? quid plura? coactus est homo uelut mendositatem corrigere uolens post magnum periculum non remanere sine plebe. unde etiam nobis uidetur aliquando te quoque in nonnullis falli potuisse.

### English translation (Claude)

You will say: ‘What if the Hebrews either refuse to answer or choose to lie?’ Will the whole multitude of Jews keep silent about my translation? Can no one be found who has a knowledge of the Hebrew language? Or will they all imitate those Jews who, you say, were found in a little town of Africa and conspired to slander me? For in your letter you weave a tale of this kind: ‘A certain brother of ours, a bishop, having arranged for your translation to be read in the church over which he presides, caused a stir by something in the prophet Jonah which you had rendered very differently from what was ingrained in the senses and memory of all and had been chanted through so many successive generations. Such a tumult arose among the people, especially as the Greeks argued and inflamed the charge of falsification, that the bishop (the city was Oea) was forced to ask for the testimony of the Jews. And they, whether from ignorance or from malice, answered that what was in the Hebrew manuscripts was what the Greeks and the Latins had and said. In short, the man was forced to correct the passage as if it were an error, wishing not to be left without a congregation after this great danger. From this it seems to us too that you also could sometimes have been mistaken in some things.’

### Translation notes

- Jerome quotes Augustine, Ep. 71.5. Oea is modern Tripoli in Libya.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.21 (CSEL 34.2:320–322; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-21).

## Letter 75.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:322–324
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome defends his rendering ‘ivy’ for the plant of Jonah 4:6 and asks Augustine to leave an old man in peace.

### Latin text

Dicis me in Iona propheta male quiddam interpretatum et seditione populi conclamante propter unius uerbi dissonantiam episcopum paene sacerdotium perdidisse. et quid sit illud, quod male interpretatus sim, subtrahis auferens mihi occasionem defensionis meae, ne, quicquid dixeris, me respondente soluatur, nisi forte ut ante annos plurimos cucurbita uenit in medium adserente illius temporis Cornelio et Asinio Pollione me hederam pro cucurbita transtulisse. super qua re in commentario Ionae prophetae plenius respondimus hoc tantum nunc dixisse contenti, quod in eo loco, ubi septuaginta interpretes cucurbitam et Aquila cum reliquis hederam transtulerunt. id est ϰιττόν, in Hebraeo uolumine ciceion scriptum habet, quam uulgo Syri ciceiam uocant; est autem genus uirgulti lata habens folia in modum pampini cumque plantatum fuerit, cito consurgit in arbusculam absque ullis calamorum et hastilium adminiculis, quibus et cucurbitae et hederae indigent, suo trunco se sustinens. hoc ergo uerbum de uerbo edisserens si ciceion transferre uoluissem, nullus intellegeret, si cucurbitam, id dicerem, quod in Hebraico non habetur; hederam posui, ut ceteris interpretibus consentirem. sin autem Iudaei uestri, ut ipse adseris, malitia uel inperitia hoc dixerunt esse in uoluminibus Hebraeorum, quod in Graecis et Latinis codicibus continetur, manifestum est eos aut Hebraeas litteras ignorare aut ad inridendos cucurbitarios noluisse mentiri. peto in fine epistulae, ut quiescentem senem olimque ueteranum militare non cogas et rursum de uita periclitari. tu, qui iuuenis es et in pontificali culmine constitutus, doceto populos et nouis Africae frugibus Romana tecta locupleta. mihi sufficit cum auditore ac lectore pauperculo in angulo monasterii susurrare.

### English translation (Claude)

You say that I translated something wrongly in the prophet Jonah, and that a bishop almost lost his office through the uproar of the people crying out over the discrepancy of one word; and yet you withhold what it is that I translated wrongly, depriving me of the occasion of defending myself, lest whatever you say should be refuted by my answer; unless perhaps, as many years ago, the gourd has come into the open again, when the Cornelius and Asinius Pollio of that time asserted that I had translated ‘ivy’ for ‘gourd’. On this matter I have answered more fully in my commentary on the prophet Jonah; it is enough now to say only this: in that passage, where the Seventy translators rendered ‘gourd’ and Aquila with the rest ‘ivy’, that is, kittos, the Hebrew volume has written ‘ciceion’, which the Syrians commonly call ‘ciceia’. It is a kind of shrub with broad leaves like a vine leaf, and when it has been planted it quickly springs up into a small tree, supporting itself on its own stem without any props of canes and poles, which both gourds and ivy need. If, then, translating word for word, I had chosen to put ‘ciceion’, no one would have understood it; if ‘gourd’, I would be saying what is not in the Hebrew; I put ‘ivy’ so as to agree with the other translators. But if your Jews, as you yourself assert, said from malice or ignorance that what is in the Greek and Latin manuscripts is in the volumes of the Hebrews, it is plain that they either do not know Hebrew letters or chose to lie in order to mock the gourd-growers. I ask at the end of my letter that you do not force an old man at rest, a veteran long since discharged, to soldier again and to risk his life once more. You who are young and set on the summit of the episcopate, teach the peoples and enrich the roofs of Rome with the new harvests of Africa. It is enough for me to whisper with a poor little hearer or reader in a corner of the monastery.

### Scripture references

- Jonah 4:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jonah 4:6: Hebrew qiqayon (here ‘ciceion’), LXX ‘gourd’, Aquila ‘ivy’. ‘Cornelius and Asinius Pollio’ are Jerome’s mocking names for an earlier critic (probably a certain Canterius), uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 75.22 (CSEL 34.2:322–324; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/75-8/#p-75-22).

## Letter 76.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:324–326
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, speaking for the Catholic Church, urges the Donatists to accept the worldwide Church promised in Scripture rather than unproved charges about the surrender of the sacred books.

### Latin text

Vobis, Donatistae, catholica ecclesia dicit: Filii hominum, usque quo graues corde? ut quid diligitis uanitatem et quaeritis mendacium? ut quid uos a totius orbis unitate nefario schismatis sacrilegio diuisistis? adtenditis falsa, quae uobis dicuntur ab hominibus aut mentientibus aut errantibus de traditione codicum diuinorum, ut in haeretica separatione moriamini, et non adtenditis, quod uobis ipsi codices dicunt, ut in catholica pace uiuatis. quare aperitis aures ad sermonem hominum dicentium, quod numquam probare potuerunt, et surdi estis aduersus sermonem dei dicentis: Dominus dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te; postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. Abrahae dictae sunt promissiones et semini eius. non dicit et seminibus tamquam in multis, sed tamquam in uno et semini tuo, quod est Christus. in semine, inquit, tuo benedicentur omnes gentes. erigite oculos cordis et considerate totum orbem terrarum, quo modo in semine Abrahae benedicuntur omnes gentes. tunc ab uno credebatur, quod nondum uidebatur; uos iam uidetis et adhuc inuidetis. passio domini pretium est orbis terrarum, ille totum orbem redemit et uos cum toto orbe ad lucrum uestrum non concordatis, sed potius in damnum uestrum in parte litigatis, ut totum perdatis. audite in psalmo, quo pretio redempti sumus: Foderunt, inquit, manus meas et pedes, dinumerauerunt omnia ossa mea; ipsi uero considerauerunt et conspexerunt me, diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestimentum meum miserunt sortem. quare diuisores uestimentorum domini esse uultis et tunicam illam caritatis desuper textam, quam nec persecutores eius diuiserunt, tenere cum toto orbe non uultis? in psalmo ipso legitur, quia totus orbis eam tenet: Commemorabuntur, inquit, et conuertentur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium. quoniam ipsius est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium. aperite aures cordis et audite, quia deus deorum dominus locutus est et uocauit terram a solis ortu usque ad occasum; ex Sion species decoris eius. si hoc non uultis intellegere, audite euangelium iam per os proprium loquente ipso domino et dicente: Quia oportebat de Christo compleri omnia, quae de illo scripta sunt in lege et prophetis et psalmis, et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipiens ab Hierusalem. quod in psalmo dixit uocauit terram a solis ortu usque ad occasum, hoc in euangelio per omnes gentes et, quod in psalmo dixit ex Sion species decoris eius, hoc in euangelio dixit incipiens ab Hierusalem.

### English translation (Claude)

To you, Donatists, the Catholic Church says: ‘Sons of men, how long will you be heavy of heart? Why do you love vanity and seek after falsehood?’ Why have you divided yourselves from the unity of the whole world by the wicked sacrilege of schism? You give heed to the false things said to you about the handing over of the divine books by men who are either lying or mistaken, so that you may die in heretical separation; and you do not give heed to what the books themselves say to you, so that you may live in Catholic peace. Why do you open your ears to the talk of men saying what they have never been able to prove, and are deaf to the word of God, who says: ‘The Lord said to me, You are my Son, today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations for your inheritance, and the ends of the earth for your possession’? ‘To Abraham the promises were spoken, and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your seed,” which is Christ.’ ‘In your seed,’ he says, ‘shall all nations be blessed.’ Lift up the eyes of your heart and consider the whole world, how in the seed of Abraham all nations are blessed. Then what was not yet seen was believed by one man; you already see it, and still you begrudge it. The passion of the Lord is the price of the whole world. He redeemed the whole world, and you do not agree with the whole world to your own gain, but rather quarrel in a part to your own loss, so that you lose the whole. Hear in the psalm at what price we were redeemed: ‘They pierced my hands and feet,’ it says, ‘they numbered all my bones; they looked and stared at me; they divided my garments among them, and for my vesture they cast lots.’ Why do you wish to be dividers of the Lord’s garments, and are unwilling to hold with the whole world that tunic of love woven from above, which not even his persecutors divided? In the same psalm we read that the whole world holds it: ‘All the ends of the earth,’ it says, ‘shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship before him. For the kingdom is his, and he shall rule over the nations.’ Open the ears of your heart and hear that ‘the God of gods, the Lord, has spoken and called the earth from the rising of the sun to its setting; out of Zion is the beauty of his comeliness.’ If you will not understand this, hear the Gospel, where the Lord himself now speaks with his own mouth and says: ‘That all things must be fulfilled concerning Christ which are written of him in the law and the prophets and the psalms, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning from Jerusalem.’ What he said in the psalm, ‘called the earth from the rising of the sun to its setting,’ he says in the Gospel, ‘among all nations’; and what he said in the psalm, ‘out of Zion is the beauty of his comeliness,’ he says in the Gospel, ‘beginning from Jerusalem.’

### Scripture references

- Ps 4:2 (4:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:16 (21:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:18 (21:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:23: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:2 (49:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:44: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:47: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- An open letter of the Catholic Church to the Donatists; polemical, translated as written. The ‘handing over’ (traditio) refers to the charge that Catholic bishops had surrendered the Scriptures in the persecution of 303–305. The seamless tunic: John 19:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 76.1 (CSEL 34.2:324–326; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-1).

## Letter 76.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:326–327
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from the parable of the wheat and tares that the Donatists separated themselves wrongly, and summarizes the origins of the schism and its condemnation at Rome, Arles, and by Constantine.

### Latin text

Fingitis uos ante tempus messis fugere permixta zizania, quia uos estis sola zizania. nam si frumenta essetis, permixta zizania toleraretis et a segete Christi non uos diuideretis. de zizaniis quidem dictum est: Quoniam abundauit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum, sed et de tritico dictum est: Qui perseuerauerit in finem usque, hic saluus erit. quare creditis creuisse zizania et mundum repleuisse, triticum autem decreuisse et in sola Africa mansisse? Christianos uos dicitis et Christo contradicitis. ipse dixit: Sinite utraque crescere usque ad messem, non dixit: Crescant zizania, decrescant frumenta; ipse dixit: Ager est hic mundus, non dixit: Ager est Africa; ipse dixit: Messis est finis saeculi, non dixit: Messis est tempus Donati; ipse dixit: Messores angeli sunt, non dixit: Messores principes Circumcellionum sunt. sed quia pro zizaniis triticum accusastis, uos esse zizania demonstrastis et, quod est grauius, ante tempus uos a tritico separastis. maiores enim uestri, in quorum sacrilega praecisione perseueratis, quidam gestis municipalibus codices sanctos et instrumenta ecclesiae persecutoribus tradiderunt, quidam eos fatentes dimiserunt et eis communicauerunt et utrique Carthaginem furiosa factione conuenerunt, de crimine traditionis, de quo ipsi inter se iam consenserant, inauditos damnauerunt, episcopum contra episcopum ordinauerunt, altare contra altare erexerunt. postea litteras ad imperatorem Constantinum, ut inter Afros episcopi transmarini iudicarent, miserunt; datis iudicibus, quos postulauerant, et Romae iudicantibus non obtemperauerunt; episcopos apud imperatorem, tamquam male iudicauerint, arguerunt; ab aliis rursus episcopis ad Arelatum missis ad ipsum imperatorem appellauerunt; ab ipso auditi et calumniatores inuenti in eodem scelere permanserunt. euigilate ad salutem, amate pacem, redite ad unitatem. haec nobis, quem ad modum gesta sint, quando uultis, omnia recitamus...

### English translation (Claude)

You pretend that you are fleeing the tares mixed in before the time of harvest, because you alone are tares. For if you were wheat, you would bear with the tares mixed in and would not divide yourselves from Christ’s crop. Of the tares indeed it is said, ‘Because iniquity has abounded, the love of many will grow cold’; but of the wheat it is also said, ‘He who perseveres to the end shall be saved.’ Why do you believe that the tares have grown and filled the world, while the wheat has dwindled and remained in Africa alone? You call yourselves Christians and contradict Christ. He said, ‘Let both grow until the harvest’; he did not say, ‘Let the tares grow and the wheat dwindle.’ He said, ‘The field is this world’; he did not say, ‘The field is Africa.’ He said, ‘The harvest is the end of the age’; he did not say, ‘The harvest is the time of Donatus.’ He said, ‘The reapers are angels’; he did not say, ‘The reapers are the chiefs of the Circumcellions.’ But because you accused the wheat of being tares, you showed that you are tares, and, what is worse, you separated yourselves from the wheat before the time. For of your forefathers, in whose sacrilegious cutting-off you persist, some handed over the holy books and the church’s documents to the persecutors, as the municipal records show; others pardoned them when they confessed and remained in communion with them; and both met at Carthage in a furious faction, condemned unheard others on the charge of handing over, about which they had already come to terms among themselves, ordained bishop against bishop, and raised altar against altar. Afterwards they sent a letter to the emperor Constantine asking that bishops from overseas should judge between the Africans; when the judges they had asked for were given and judged at Rome, they did not obey them; they accused the bishops before the emperor of having judged badly; when other bishops were sent again to Arles, they appealed from them to the emperor himself; heard by him and found to be slanderers, they persisted in the same crime. Awake to salvation, love peace, return to unity. We will read out to you how all these things were done whenever you wish.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:30: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:39: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Parable of the wheat and tares: Matt 13:24–30, 36–43. The Council of Carthage (ca. 308/312), the Council of Rome (313), the Council of Arles (314), and Constantine’s judgment (316). The Circumcellions were Donatist bands of rural militants. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 76.2 (CSEL 34.2:326–327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-2).

## Letter 76.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:327–328
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points out the Donatists’ inconsistency in tolerating Optatus and receiving back the Maximianists, such as Felicianus of Musti, whom they had condemned.

### Latin text

Ille communicat malis, qui consentit factis malorum, non qui tolerat in agro dominico zizania usque ad messem uel paleam usque ad ultimam uentilationem. si malos odistis, uos ipsi mutamini ab scelere schismatis; si malorum permixtionem timeretis, Optatum inter uos in apertissima iniquitate uiuentem per tot annos non teneretis. quem cum modo martyrem dicitis, superest, ut eum, propter quem mortuus est, Christum dicatis. postremo quid uos offendit orbis Christianus, a quo uos nefario furore praecidistis? et quid uos promeruerunt Maximianistae, quos a uobis damnatos et per iudicia publica de basilicis proturbatos in suo rursus honore recepistis? quid uos offendit pax Christi, contra quam uos diuiditis ab eis, quos infamatis? et quid uos promeruit pax Donati, pro qua suscipitis, quos damnatis? Felicianus Mustitanus modo uobiscum est. legimus eum prius in uestro concilio damnatum et a uobis postea in iudicio proconsulis accusatum et in Mustitana ciuitate gestis municipalibus oppugnatum.

### English translation (Claude)

He shares with the wicked who consents to the deeds of the wicked, not he who bears with the tares in the Lord’s field until the harvest, or with the chaff until the final winnowing. If you hate the wicked, change yourselves from the crime of schism; if you feared being mixed with the wicked, you would not have kept among you for so many years Optatus, living in the most open iniquity. Since you now call him a martyr, it remains for you to call him for whose sake he died Christ. In short, how has the Christian world offended you, from which you have cut yourselves off in wicked fury? And how did the Maximianists deserve well of you, whom you condemned and drove out of the basilicas by public judgments, and then received back in their honour? How has the peace of Christ offended you, against which you divide yourselves from those whom you defame? And how did the peace of Donatus deserve well of you, for whose sake you receive those whom you condemn? Felicianus of Musti is now with you. We read that he was first condemned in your council, afterwards accused by you in the proconsul’s court, and attacked in the municipal records of the city of Musti.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Optatus, Donatist bishop of Thamugadi, supporter of the rebel Gildo, died in prison in 398. The Maximianists were a schism within the Donatist church, condemned at the Donatist council of Bagai (394). Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 76.3 (CSEL 34.2:327–328; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-3).

## Letter 76.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:328–329
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts the Donatists’ charge of handing over the Scriptures with their own acceptance of the Maximianist schismatics and their baptism, and urges Donatist laity to question their bishops.

### Latin text

Si traditio codicum scelerata est, quia deus in regem, qui Hieremiae librum incendit, morte bellica uindicauit, quanto sceleratius est sacrilegium schismatis, cuius auctores, quibus Maximianistas comparastis, aperta terra uiuos absorbuit! quo modo ergo crimen traditionis nobis obicitis, quod non probatis. et schismaticos uestros et damnatis et acceptatis? si propterea iusti estis, quia persecutionem per imperatores passi estis, iustiores uobis sunt ipsi Maximianistae, quos per iudices ab imperatoribus catholicis missos uos ipsi persecuti estis. si baptismum uos soli habetis, quid apud uos facit baptismus Maximianistarum in eis, quos baptizauit Felicianus damnatus, cum quibus est ad uos postea reuocatus? uel uobis laicis ad ista respondeant episcopi uestri, si nobiscum loqui nolunt, et cogitate pro salute uestra, quale sit hoc ipsum, quod nobiscum loqui nolunt. si lupi concilium fecerunt, ut pastoribus non respondeant, quare oues consilium perdiderunt, ut ad luporum speluncas accedant?

### English translation (Claude)

If the handing over of the books is a crime, because God punished with death in war the king who burned the book of Jeremiah, how much more criminal is the sacrilege of schism, whose authors, to whom you compared the Maximianists, the opened earth swallowed alive! How, then, do you charge us with the crime of handing over, which you do not prove, and both condemn and accept your own schismatics? If you are righteous because you suffered persecution through the emperors, the Maximianists themselves are more righteous than you, for you yourselves persecuted them through judges sent by Catholic emperors. If you alone have baptism, what is the baptism of the Maximianists doing among you in those whom the condemned Felicianus baptized, and with whom he was afterwards recalled to you? Let your bishops answer these questions to you, the laity, if they will not speak with us; and consider, for your own salvation, what this very thing means, that they will not speak with us. If the wolves have held a council not to answer the shepherds, why have the sheep lost their counsel, so as to go to the dens of the wolves?

### Scripture references

- Jer 36:23: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The king is Jehoiakim (Jer 36:23, 30; cf. 2 Kgs 24); the schismatics swallowed alive are Korah, Dathan, and Abiram (Num 16:31–33), to whom the Donatist council of Bagai compared the Maximianists. Wordplay on concilium/consilium. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 76.4 (CSEL 34.2:328–329; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-76-4).

## Letter 77.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-77-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:329–330
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Felix and Hilarinus not to be shaken by slander against God’s servants, which Christ foretold.

### Latin text

Non miror satanan fidelium animos perturbantem. cui resistite permanentes in spe promissorum dei, qui fallere non potest, qui non solum nobis in se credentibus et sperantibus et in eius caritate usque in finem perseuerantibus polliceri praemia aeterna dignatus est, uerum etiam temporalia scandala non defutura praedixit, quibus fidem nostram exerceri et probari oporteret; ait enim: Quoniam abundauit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum; sed continuo subiecit: Qui autem perseuerauerit usque in finem, hic saluus erit. quid ergo mirum, si homines seruis dei detrahunt et, quia eorum uitam peruertere non possunt, famam decolorare conantur, cum ipsum deum et dominum eorum cotidie blasphemare non cessent, cum eis displicet, quicquid contra eorum uoluntatem iusto et occulto iudicio facit? unde exhortor prudentiam uestram, domini dilectissimi meritoque honorandi fratres, ut scripturam dei, qui nobis haec omnia futura praenuntiauit et aduersus ea nos firmos esse debere praemonuit, contra hominum maledica uaniloquia suspicionesque temerarias corde Christianissimo cogitetis.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not wonder that Satan troubles the minds of the faithful. Resist him, persevering in the hope of the promises of God, who cannot deceive, who has deigned not only to promise eternal rewards to us who believe and hope in him and persevere in his love to the end, but has also foretold that temporal offences would not be lacking, by which our faith must be exercised and tested. For he says, ‘Because iniquity has abounded, the love of many will grow cold’; but at once he added, ‘But he who perseveres to the end shall be saved.’ What wonder is it, then, if men disparage the servants of God, and, because they cannot pervert their life, try to stain their reputation, when they do not cease daily to blaspheme God himself, their Lord, since whatever he does against their will by his just and hidden judgment displeases them? Therefore I exhort your Prudence, my most beloved lords and brothers, deservedly honoured, to consider with most Christian hearts, against the slanderous empty talk and rash suspicions of men, the Scripture of God, who foretold to us that all these things would happen and warned us beforehand that we must be firm against them.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Felix and Hilarinus, laymen of Hippo (named in the heading of the manuscripts, not in the staged text).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 77.1 (CSEL 34.2:329–330; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-77-1).

## Letter 77.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-77-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:330–331
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he will not strike the presbyter Boniface from the clergy list, since no crime has been proved and his case with Spes awaits God’s judgment.

### Latin text

Breuiter itaque dico caritati uestrae Bonifatium presbyterum in nullo crimine apud me fuisse detectum, nequaquam me de illo tale aliquid credidisse uel credere. quo modo ergo iuberem de numero presbyterorum nomen eius auferri uehementer terrente euangelio, ubi dominus ait: In quo iudicio iudicaueritis, iudicabimini? cum enim causa, quae inter illum et Spem exorta est, sub diuino examine pendeat secundum placitum eorum, quod uobis, si uolueritis, poterit recitari, quis ego sum, ut audeam dei praeuenire sententiam. in delendo uel supprimendo eius nomine, de quo nec suspicari temere mali aliquid episcopus debui nec dilucide iudicare homo de occultis hominum potui, cum in ipsis causis saecularibus, quando ad maiorem potestatem refertur arbitrium iudicandi, manentibus, sicuti erant, omnibus rebus expectetur illa sententia, unde iam non liceat prouocari, ne superiori cognitori fiat iniuria, si eius pendente iudicio aliquid fuerit commutatum? et utique multum interest inter diuinam et humanam quamlibet excelsissimam potestatem. domini dei nostri misericordia numquam uos deserat, domini dilectissimi et honorandi fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

So I tell your Charity briefly that the presbyter Boniface has not been found guilty of any crime before me, and that I have in no way believed, nor do I believe, any such thing of him. How then could I order his name to be removed from the list of presbyters, when the Gospel strikes such terror, where the Lord says, ‘With what judgment you judge, you shall be judged’? For since the case that has arisen between him and Spes is pending before the divine examination, according to their agreement, which can be read to you if you wish, who am I to dare anticipate God’s sentence by deleting or suppressing the name of one of whom, as a bishop, I ought not rashly to suspect anything evil, and of whom, as a man, I could not clearly judge in matters hidden in men? For even in secular cases, when the decision of judgment is referred to a higher authority, all things are left as they were while that sentence is awaited from which there can be no further appeal, lest injury be done to the higher judge if anything is changed while his judgment is pending. And surely there is a great difference between the divine power and any human power, however exalted. May the mercy of the Lord our God never forsake you, my most beloved and honoured lords and brothers.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:2: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 77.2 (CSEL 34.2:330–331; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-77-2).

## Letter 78.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:331–333
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds his people that Scripture foretold offences and the cooling of love before the end, so that they might persevere.

### Latin text

Utinam scripturae dei sollicita mente intendentes in quibusque scandalis adiutorio nostri sermonis non egeretis et ille uos potius consolaretur, qui consolatur et nos, qui non solum bona, quae sanctis et fidelibus suis est redditurus, uerum etiam mala, quibus erat hic mundus abundaturus, ante praedixit, ante conscribenda curauit, ut bona post saeculi finem secutura certiores expectaremus, quam mala similiter praenuntiata ante saeculi finem praecedentia sentiremus. unde et apostolus dicit: Quaecumque enim ante scripta sunt, ut nos doceremur, scripta sunt, ut per patientiam et consolationem scripturarum spem habeamus ad deum. quid autem opus erat, ut ipse dominus Iesus non solum diceret: Tunc iusti fulgebunt sicut sol in regno patris sui, quod post saeculi finem futurum est uerum etiam exclamaret: Vae mundo ab scandalis, nisi ut nobis non blandiremur uenire nos posse ad sedes felicitatis aeternae, nisi temporalibus malis exerciti non defecerimus? quid opus fuit, ut diceret: Quoniam abundauit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum, nisi ut illi, de quibus continuo locutus adiunxit: Qui perseuerauerit usque in finem, hic saluus erit, cum hac iniquitatis abundantia refrigescentem caritatem uiderent, non perturbarentur, non expauescerent, non quasi rebus insperatis et inopinatis contristati deficerent, sed potius uidentes accidere, quae futura praedicta sunt ante finem, patienter perseuerarent, usque in finem, ut securi mererentur regnare post finem in ea uita, quae non habet finem?

### English translation (Claude)

Would that, attending with careful minds to the Scriptures of God, you did not need the help of our words in every offence, and that rather he might console you who consoles us too, who foretold not only the good things which he will render to his saints and faithful, but also the evils with which this world was to abound, and had them written down beforehand, so that we might await with greater certainty the good things that will follow after the end of the world, when we experience the evils, likewise foretold, that come before the end of the world. Hence the apostle too says: ‘For whatever was written beforehand was written for our learning, that through patience and the comfort of the Scriptures we might have hope in God.’ What need was there that the Lord Jesus himself should not only say, ‘Then the righteous shall shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father,’ which is to happen after the end of the world, but also cry out, ‘Woe to the world because of offences,’ except that we should not flatter ourselves that we can come to the seats of eternal happiness unless, exercised by temporal evils, we do not fail? What need was there for him to say, ‘Because iniquity has abounded, the love of many will grow cold,’ except that those of whom he spoke when he at once added, ‘He who perseveres to the end shall be saved,’ should not be troubled, nor terrified, nor fail through grief as at things unhoped for and unexpected, when they saw love growing cold through this abundance of iniquity, but rather, seeing those things happen which were foretold to come before the end, should persevere patiently to the end, so that they might deserve to reign securely after the end in that life which has no end?

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 1:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 15:4: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:43: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to the clergy, elders, and people of the church of Hippo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.1 (CSEL 34.2:331–333; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-1).

## Letter 78.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:333–334
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks his people to grieve and pray over the case between the presbyter Boniface and Spes, one of whom must be guilty of a sexual advance or of slander.

### Latin text

Proinde, carissimi, in isto scandalo, quo de Bonifatio presbytero nonnulli perturbantur, non uobis dico, ut non doleatis — qui enim ista non dolent, non est in eis caritas Christi; qui autem etiam de talibus gaudent, abundat in eis malignitas diaboli —, non quia in memorato presbytero apparuit aliquid, quod dignum damnatione iudicaretur, sed quia duo de domo nostra talem habent causam, ut unus eorum sine dubio perditus habeatur et sit alterius fama apud quosdam mala, apud quosdam dubia, etiam si non sit maculata conscientia. dolete ista, quoniam dolenda sunt, non tamen sic, ut eo dolore uestra caritas a bene uiuendo refrigescat, sed potius ad dominum deprecandum inardescat, ut, si innocens est presbyter uester, quod magis credo, quia, cum sensisset alterius motum inpudicum et inmundum, nec consentire uoluit nec tacere, cito eum sua diuina sententia manifestatum ministerio proprio repraesentet; si autem male sibi conscius, quod suspicari non audeo, uoluit alterius existimationem laedere, cum eius pudicitiam contaminare non posset, sicut dicit ipse, cum quo habet causam, non eum permittat suam occultare nequitiam, ut, quod homines inuenire non possunt, de quolibet eorum diuino iudicio propaletur.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, dearly beloved, in this offence by which some are troubled concerning the presbyter Boniface, I do not tell you not to grieve (for those who do not grieve at such things do not have the love of Christ in them, and those who even rejoice at such things abound in the malice of the devil); not because anything has appeared in the said presbyter that should be judged worthy of condemnation, but because two of our household have such a case that one of them must without doubt be regarded as lost, and the other’s reputation is bad with some and doubtful with others, even if his conscience is not stained. Grieve at these things, because they are to be grieved at; yet not so that by this grief your love grows cold from good living, but rather that it is kindled to pray to the Lord that, if your presbyter is innocent, as I rather believe (for when he perceived the other’s shameless and unclean impulse he would neither consent nor keep silent), God may quickly make this plain by his divine sentence and restore him to his ministry; but if, conscious of guilt (which I dare not suspect), he sought to injure the other’s reputation because he could not corrupt his chastity, as the man with whom he has the case says, that God may not allow him to hide his wickedness, so that what men cannot discover may be revealed by divine judgment concerning whichever of them it may be.

### Translation notes

- The case: Spes, a member of Augustine’s monastic household, accused Boniface; Boniface said Spes had made an indecent proposal to him. Augustine inclines to believe Boniface.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.2 (CSEL 34.2:333–334; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-2).

## Letter 78.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:334–336
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains how the case arose and why he sent Boniface and Spes to the shrine of St Felix at Nola, where God might reveal the guilty party.

### Latin text

Cum enim me causa ista diu cruciasset nec inuenirem. quo modo unus e duobus conuinceretur, quamuis magis presbytero credidissem, cogitaueram primo sic ambos deo relinquere, donec in uno eorum, qui mihi suspectus erat. aliquid existeret, unde non sine iusta et manifesta causa de nostro habitaculo proiceretur. sed cum promoueri in clericatu siue illic per me siue alibi per litteras meas uehementissime conaretur, ego autem nullo modo adducerer ei homini, de quo tantum mali existimarem, manus ordinationis inponere aut per commendationem meam alicui fratri meo eum subintroducere, turbulentius agere coepit, ut, si ipse in clericatu non promoueretur, nec presbyter Bonifatius in suo gradu esse permitteretur. in qua eius prouocatione cum uiderem Bonifatium nolle quibuslibet infirmis et ad suspicionem propensis de suae uitae dubitatione scandalum fieri paratumque esse honoris sui apud homines damnum perpeti potius quam in ea contentione, in qua non posset ignorantibus et dubitantibus uel ad male suspicandum procliuioribus suam demonstrare conscientiam, usque ad Ecclesiae perturbationem inaniter progredi, elegi aliquid medium, ut certo placito se ambo constringerent ad locum sanctum se pergituros, ubi terribiliora opera dei non sanam cuiusque conscientiam multo facilius aperirent et ad confessionem uel poena uel timore compellerent. ubique quidem deus est et nullo continetur uel includitur loco, qui condidit omnia, et eum a ueris adoratoribus in spiritu et ueritate oportet adorari, ut in occulto exaudiens in occulto etiam iustificet et coronet. uerum tamen ad ista, quae hominibus uisibiliter nota sunt, quis potest eius consilium perscrutari, quare in aliis locis haec miracula fiant, in aliis non fiant? multis enim notissima est sanctitas loci, ubi beati Felicis Nolensis corpus conditum est, quo uolui ut pergerent, quia inde nobis facilius fideliusque scribi potest, quicquid in eorum aliquo diuinitus fuerit propalatum. nam et nos nouimus Mediolani apud memoriam sanctorum, ubi mirabiliter et terribiliter daemones confitentur, furem quendam, qui ad eum locum uenerat, ut falsum iurando deciperet, compulsum fuisse confiteri furtum et, quod abstulerat, reddere. numquid non et Africa sanctorum martyrum corporibus plena est? et tamen nusquam hic scimus talia fieri. sicut enim, quod apostolus dicit, non omnes sancti dona habent curationum nec omnes habent diiudicationem spirituum, ita nec in omnibus memoriis sanctorum ista fieri uoluit ille, qui diuidit propria unicuique, prout uult.

### English translation (Claude)

For when this case had long tormented me, and I could not find how one of the two could be convicted, although I was more inclined to believe the presbyter, I had at first thought of leaving both to God until something should come to light in the one I suspected, by which he could be expelled from our dwelling with just and manifest cause. But when he tried most vehemently to be promoted in the clergy, either here by me or elsewhere through my letters, and I could in no way be brought to lay the hands of ordination on a man of whom I thought so much evil, or to introduce him to any brother of mine by my recommendation, he began to act more turbulently, so that, if he himself was not promoted in the clergy, neither should the presbyter Boniface be allowed to remain in his rank. When, at this challenge of his, I saw that Boniface did not wish an offence to arise for any of the weak and those prone to suspicion through doubt about his life, and was ready to suffer the loss of his honour among men rather than go on vainly, to the disturbance of the church, in a contest in which he could not demonstrate his conscience to those who did not know, those who doubted, or those more inclined to suspect evil, I chose a middle course: that both should bind themselves by a definite agreement to go to a holy place, where the more awe-inspiring works of God might much more easily lay bare the unsound conscience of either and drive him to confession by punishment or fear. God is everywhere indeed, and he who made all things is contained or enclosed by no place, and he must be worshipped by true worshippers in spirit and in truth, so that, hearing in secret, he may also justify and crown in secret. Yet as to those things which are visibly known to men, who can search out his counsel, why these miracles happen in some places and not in others? For the holiness of the place where the body of blessed Felix of Nola is buried is very well known to many, and there I wished them to go, because from there whatever is divinely revealed in either of them can be written to us more easily and reliably. For we too know that at Milan, at the shrine of the saints, where demons confess in a marvellous and terrible way, a certain thief who had come to that place to deceive by swearing falsely was compelled to confess the theft and restore what he had taken. Is not Africa too full of the bodies of holy martyrs? And yet nowhere here do we know such things to happen. For just as, as the apostle says, not all the saints have gifts of healing, nor do all have the discernment of spirits, so he who distributes to each as he wills did not will that these things should happen at all the shrines of the saints.

### Scripture references

- John 4:23: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 11:34: echo, low confidence
- 1 Cor 12:30: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The shrine at Milan is that of Gervasius and Protasius. Allusions to John 4:23–24; Matt 6:4–6; 1 Cor 12:9–11, 30; Rom 11:33–34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.3 (CSEL 34.2:334–336; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-3).

## Letter 78.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:336–338
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains why he has not removed Boniface’s name from the clergy list but will leave it unread if the people wish, since only a guilty conscience removes a name from the book of life.

### Latin text

Quapropter cum ego noluissem hunc grauissimum dolorem cordis mei uobis perferre in notitiam, ne uos atrociter et inaniter contristando turbarem, fortassis ideo deus noluit uos latere, ut nobiscum orationibus incumbatis, ut, quod ipse in hac causa nouit, nos autem nosse non possumus, etiam nobis manifestare dignetur. nomen autem presbyteri propterea non ausus sum de numero collegarum eius uel supprimere uel delere, ne diuinae potestati, sub cuius examine causa adhuc pendet, facere uiderer iniuriam, si illius iudicium meo uellem praeiudicio praeuenire. quod nec in negotiis saecularibus iudices faciunt, quando causae dubitatio ad maiorem potestatem refertur, ut pendente relatione aliquid audeant commutare. et in episcoporum concilio constitutum est nullum clericum, qui nondum conuictus sit, suspendi a communione debere, nisi ad causam suam examinandam se non praesentauerit. Bonifatius tamen hanc humilitatem suscepit, ut nec litteras acciperet, quibus in peregrinationem honorem suum quaereret, ut in eo loco, ubi ambo ignoti sunt, circa ambos aequalitas seruaretur. et nunc, si uobis placet, ut nomen eius non recitetur, ne his, qui ad ecclesiam nolunt accedere, sicut ait apostolus, demus occasionem quaerentibus occasionem, non erit hoc nostrum factum sed eorum, quorum causa fuerit factum. quid enim obest homini, quod ex illa tabula non uult eum recitari humana ignorantia, si de libro uiuorum non eum delet iniqua conscientia?

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, although I had not wished to bring this most grievous pain of my heart to your knowledge, lest I should trouble you by saddening you grievously and to no purpose, perhaps God did not wish it to be hidden from you so that you might join us in earnest prayer, that he may deign to make known to us too what he knows in this case and we cannot know. I did not dare to suppress or delete the presbyter’s name from the list of his colleagues, lest I should seem to do injury to the divine power, before whose examination the case is still pending, if I wished to forestall his judgment by my prejudgment. Not even judges in secular affairs do this, when a doubtful case is referred to a higher authority, daring to change anything while the reference is pending. And it was decreed in a council of bishops that no cleric who has not yet been convicted should be suspended from communion, unless he has failed to present himself for the examination of his case. Boniface, however, accepted this humility, that he would not receive letters with which to claim his honour while travelling, so that in the place where both are unknown, equality might be kept between them. And now, if you wish his name not to be read out, so that, as the apostle says, we may not give occasion to those seeking occasion, to those who do not wish to come to the church, this will not be our doing but theirs on whose account it is done. For what harm is it to a man that human ignorance does not wish him to be read out from that list, if a wicked conscience does not blot him out of the book of the living?

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:12: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 69:28 (68:29 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The council is probably the Council of Carthage of 397 (or Hippo 393); uncertain. ‘That list’ is the diptych of clergy read out in church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.4 (CSEL 34.2:336–338; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-4).

## Letter 78.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:338–339
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns against the devil’s three snares in such cases: imitating evil, losing heart under slander, and judging others by suspicion.

### Latin text

Proinde, fratres mei, qui timetis deum, mementote, quod ait apostolus Petrus: Quoniam aduersarius uester diabolus tamquam leo rugiens circuit quaerens. quem deuoret. quem non potest deuorare seductum ad nequitiam, famam ipsius inquinare conatur, ut, si fieri potest. opprobriis hominum et malarum linguarum detractione deficiat et sic in eius fauces ruat. si autem nec famam innocentis maculare potuerit, hoc ei persuadere temptat, ut per maliuolas suspiciones de fratre suo iudicet et sic ab illo implicatus absorbeatur. et quis omnes eius captiones et circumuentiones uel comprehendere uel enumerare sufficiat? aduersus haec tamen tria, quae ad causam praesentem pertinent, prius, ne mala exempla imitando ad nequitiam seducamini, ita uos per apostolum adloquitur deus: Ne sitis iugum ducentes cum infidelibus; quae enim participatio iustitiae cum iniquitate aut quae societas luci ad tenebras? item alio loco: Nolite, inquit, seduci: corrumpunt mores bonos conloqui mala. sobrii estote. iusti et nolite peccare. ut autem linguis detrahentium non deficiatis, sic per prophetam dicit: Audite me, qui scitis iudicium, populus meus, in quorum corde lex mea est. opprobria hominum nolite metuere et detractione eorum ne superemini nec, quod uos spernant, magni duxeritis. sicut enim uestimentum ita per tempus absumentur et sicut lana a tinea comedentur, iustitia autem mea in aeternum manet. iam uero ne maliuolo animo de seruis dei falsa suspicando pereatis, illud apostolicum recordamini, ubi ait: Nolite ante tempus quicquam iudicare, donec ueniat dominus et inluminet abscondita tenebrarum; et manifestabit cogitationes cordis et tunc laus erit unicuique a deo. et item illud, quod scriptum est: Quae manifesta sunt, uobis; quae autem occulta sunt, domino deo uestro.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, my brothers who fear God, remember what the apostle Peter says: ‘Your adversary the devil, like a roaring lion, goes about seeking whom he may devour.’ Whom he cannot devour by seducing him into wickedness, he tries to defile in reputation, so that, if possible, he may fail under the reproaches of men and the disparagement of evil tongues, and so fall into his jaws. But if he cannot stain the reputation of the innocent, he tries to persuade him to judge his brother by malicious suspicions, and so, entangled by him, to be swallowed up. And who can comprehend or enumerate all his snares and deceits? Yet against those three which concern the present case God speaks to you thus through the apostle: first, so that you may not be seduced into wickedness by imitating bad examples: ‘Do not be yoked with unbelievers; for what partnership has righteousness with iniquity, or what fellowship has light with darkness?’ Likewise in another place: ‘Do not be deceived,’ he says, ‘evil communications corrupt good manners. Be sober and righteous, and do not sin.’ So that you may not fail under the tongues of detractors, he says through the prophet: ‘Hear me, you who know judgment, my people, in whose heart is my law. Do not fear the reproaches of men, and do not be overcome by their disparagement, nor think it great that they despise you. For like a garment they shall be consumed in time, and like wool they shall be eaten by the moth; but my righteousness abides for ever.’ And so that you may not perish by maliciously suspecting false things of the servants of God, remember the apostle’s words: ‘Judge nothing before the time, until the Lord comes, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and will make manifest the thoughts of the heart; and then each one will have praise from God.’ And likewise what is written: ‘The things that are revealed are for you; but the hidden things are for the Lord your God.’

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:33: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:34: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 51:7: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 51:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 29:29: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Pet 5:8; 2 Cor 6:14; 1 Cor 15:33–34 (the proverb is from Menander’s Thais); Isa 51:7–8; 1 Cor 4:5; Deut 29:29 (in an Old Latin form).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.5 (CSEL 34.2:338–339; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-5).

## Letter 78.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:339–341
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks his people not to add to his pain, and compares those who delight in clerical scandals to the dogs that licked Lazarus’s sores.

### Latin text

Manifestum est quidem, quia ista in ecclesia non accidunt sine graui tristitia sanctorum atque fidelium; uerum tamen consoletur nos, qui cuncta praedixit atque, ut abundantia iniquitatis non refrigescamus, sed usque in finem perseueremus, ut salui esse possimus, admonuit. nam quantum ad me adtinet, si est in me quantulacumque caritas Christi. quis uestrum infirmatur et ego non infirmor? quis scandalizatur et ego non uror? nolite itaque augere cruciatus meos deficiendo uel in suspicionibus falsis uel in peccatis alienis; nolite, obsecro uos, ne dicam de uobis: Et super dolorem uulnerum meorum addiderunt. nam illi, qui gaudent de istis doloribus nostris, de quibus in persona corporis Christi tanto ante praedictum est: Aduersus me insultabant, qui sedebant in porta, et in me psallebant, qui bibebant uinum. ualde tolerabilius sustinentur; pro quibus tamen etiam ipsis orare et bonum eis uelle didicimus. ad quid enim aliud sedent isti et quid aliud captant, nisi ut, quisquis episcopus uel clericus uel monachus uel sanctimonialis ceciderit, omnes tales esse credant, iactent. contendant, sed non omnes posse manifestari? et tamen etiam ipsi, cum aliqua maritata inuenitur adultera, nec proiciunt uxores suas nec accusant matres suas; cum autem de aliquibus. qui sanctum nomen profitentur, aliquid criminis uel falsi sonuerit uel ueri patuerit, instant, satagunt, ambiunt, ut de omnibus hoc credatur. hos ergo de nostris doloribus suauitatem suae malae linguae captantes facile est ut illis canibus comparemus, si forte in malo intellegendi sunt, qui lingebant uulnera pauperis illius, qui ante ianuam diuitis iacebat et, quousque ueniret ad requiem sinus Abrahae, laboriosa et indigna omnia tolerabat.

### English translation (Claude)

It is plain, indeed, that these things do not happen in the church without grave sorrow to the saints and faithful; yet let him console us who foretold all things and warned us not to grow cold through the abundance of iniquity, but to persevere to the end, that we may be saved. For as far as I am concerned, if there is in me even a little of the love of Christ, ‘Who among you is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?’ Do not, then, increase my torments by failing either through false suspicions or through the sins of others; do not, I beseech you, lest I say of you, ‘And they added to the pain of my wounds.’ For those who rejoice at these sorrows of ours, of whom it was foretold so long before in the person of the body of Christ, ‘They who sat in the gate spoke against me, and they who drank wine made songs about me,’ are much more easily borne; and yet we have learned to pray even for them and to wish them well. For why else do they sit, and what else do they seek, except that, whenever a bishop or cleric or monk or nun has fallen, they may believe, boast, and maintain that all are such, but that not all can be exposed? And yet these same men, when some married woman is found to be an adulteress, do not cast off their wives or accuse their mothers; but when some crime, whether false, has been rumoured, or true, has come to light, concerning some who profess a holy name, they press on, busy themselves, and strive that it be believed of all. These men, then, who catch from our sorrows the sweetness of their evil tongues, we may easily compare to those dogs (if perhaps they are to be understood in a bad sense) which licked the sores of that poor man who lay before the rich man’s gate and bore all hardships and indignities until he came to the rest of Abraham’s bosom.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:13: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 69:26 (68:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 69:12 (68:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 2 Cor 11:29; Ps 69:26 (LXX 68:27); Ps 69:12 (LXX 68:13); allusion to Luke 16:20–22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.6 (CSEL 34.2:339–341; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-6).

## Letter 78.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:341–342
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks his people not to add to his sorrow and prays that God will strengthen them.

### Latin text

Vos me nolite amplius cruciare. qui aliquam spem habetis ad deum. uos nolite ipsa uulnera, quae illi lingunt, multiplicare, uos, pro quibus periclitamur omni hora habentes foris pugnas, intus timores periculis in ciuitate, periculis in deserto, periculis ex gentibus, periculis in falsis fratribus. scio, quia doletis, sed numquid acrius quam ego? scio, quia conturbati estis, sed timeo, ne inter linguas maledicorum deficiat et pereat infirmus, propter quem Christus mortuus est. non ex uobis increscat dolor noster, quia non culpa nostra factus est uester. nam hoc est, quod praecauere conatus sum. ut. si fieri posset, hoc malum nec uitandum neglegeretur nec in uestram notitiam perferretur, ubi infructuose cruciarentur firmi et periculose turbarentur infirmi. sed qui hoc cognito permisit uos temptari, det uobis uires sustinendi et erudiat uos ex lege sua, doceat uos et mitiget a diebus malignis, donec fodiatur peccatori fouea.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not torment me further, you who have any hope in God. Do not multiply the very wounds which they lick, you for whom we are in danger every hour, having ‘fightings without, fears within,’ ‘perils in the city, perils in the wilderness, perils from the Gentiles, perils among false brethren.’ I know that you grieve; but surely not more keenly than I? I know that you are troubled; but I fear lest, amid the tongues of the slanderers, the weak brother should fail and perish, for whom Christ died. Let not our sorrow increase because of you, since yours did not arise through our fault. For this is what I tried to guard against: that, if possible, this evil should neither be neglected when it ought to be avoided nor be brought to your knowledge, where the strong would be tormented to no purpose and the weak dangerously troubled. But may he who allowed you to be tried by learning of it give you strength to endure, and instruct you out of his law, teach you, and give you rest from the evil days, until a pit is dug for the sinner.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 7:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:26: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:30: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 8:11: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 94:12 (93:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:13 (93:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 2 Cor 7:5; 2 Cor 11:26; allusions to 1 Cor 15:30; 1 Cor 8:11; quotation of Ps 94:12–13 (LXX 93:12–13).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.7 (CSEL 34.2:341–342; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-7).

## Letter 78.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:342–344
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes those who boasted over the fall of two Donatist deacons, and shows from Scripture that no household, not even Christ’s, is free of the wicked.

### Latin text

Audio nonnullos uestrum hinc amplius contristari, quod de lapsu duorum illorum diaconorum, qui ex parte Donati uenerant, tamquam disciplinae Proculiani insultauerunt uelut gloriantes de nobis, quod ex nostra disciplina nihil tale in clericis extitisset. quod quicumque fecistis, fateor uobis. non bene fecistis. ecce docuit uos deus, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. nec obiciatis haereticis, nisi quia non sunt catholici, ne similes eis sitis, qui non habendo, quod in causa suae diuisionis defendant. non nisi hominum crimina colligere affectant et ea ipsa plura falsissime iactant, ut quia ipsam diuinae scripturae ueritatem, qua ubique diffusa Christi ecclesia commendatur, criminari et obscurare non possunt, homines, per quos praedicatur, adducant in odium, de quibus et fingere, quicquid in mentem uenerit, possunt. nos autem non ita didicistis Christum, si tamen illum audistis et in illo docti estis. ipse quippe fideles suos securos fecit etiam de dispensatoribus malis mala sua facientibus et bona eius loquentibus, ubi ait: Quae dicunt, facite, quae autem faciunt, facere nolite; dicunt enim et non faciunt. orate quidem pro me, ne forte aliis praedicans ipse reprobus inueniar; uerum tamen cum gloriamini, non in me sed in domino gloriamini. quantum libet enim uigilet disciplina domus meae, homo sum et inter homines uiuo nec mihi adrogare audeo, ut domus mea melior sit quam arca Noe, ubi tamen inter octo homines reprobus unus inuentus est; aut melior sit quam domus Abrahae, ubi dictum est: Eice ancillam et filium eius; aut melior sit quam domus Isaac, cuius de duobus geminis dictum est: Iacob dilexi, Esau odio habui; aut melior sit quam domus ipsius Iacob, ubi lectum patris filius incestauit; aut melior sit quam domus Dauid, cuius filius cum sorore concubuit, cuius alter filius contra patris tam sanctam mansuetudinem rebellauit; aut melior sit quam cohabitatio apostoli Pauli, qui tamen si inter omnes bonos habitaret, non diceret, quod superius commemoraui: Foris pugnae, intus timores, nec diceret. cum de sanctitate et fide Timothei loqueretur: Neminem habeo, qui germane de uobis sollicitus sit; omnes sua quaerunt, non quae Iesu Christi; aut melior sit quam cohabitatio ipsius domini Christi, in qua undecim boni perfidum et furem Iudam tolerauerunt; aut melior sit postremo quam caelum, unde angeli ceciderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

I hear that some of you are saddened further by this: that, at the fall of those two deacons who had come over from the party of Donatus, you taunted the discipline of Proculeianus, as if boasting about us that nothing of the kind had arisen among the clergy from our discipline. Whoever of you did this, I confess to you, did not do well. See, God has taught you that ‘he who glories, let him glory in the Lord.’ And do not reproach heretics with anything except that they are not Catholics, lest you become like them, who, having nothing to defend in the cause of their division, aim only at collecting the crimes of men and noise abroad even these, and more, most falsely; so that, since they cannot accuse and obscure the very truth of the divine Scripture, by which the church of Christ spread everywhere is commended, they may bring into hatred the men through whom it is preached, about whom they can invent whatever comes into their minds. ‘But you did not so learn Christ, if indeed you have heard him and been taught in him.’ For he made his faithful secure even about bad stewards, who do their own evil and speak his good, where he says: ‘What they say, do; but what they do, do not do; for they say and do not do.’ Pray for me indeed, lest perhaps, having preached to others, I myself should be found reprobate; yet when you glory, glory not in me but in the Lord. For however watchful the discipline of my house may be, I am a man and live among men, and I do not dare to claim that my house is better than Noah’s ark, where yet among eight persons one was found reprobate; or better than the house of Abraham, where it was said, ‘Cast out the slave woman and her son’; or better than the house of Isaac, of whose two twins it was said, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated’; or better than the house of Jacob himself, where a son defiled his father’s bed; or better than the house of David, one of whose sons lay with his sister, and another rebelled against his father’s so holy gentleness; or better than the company of the apostle Paul, who, if he had lived among none but the good, would not have said what I mentioned above, ‘Fightings without, fears within,’ nor would he have said, when speaking of the holiness and faith of Timothy, ‘I have no one who is genuinely concerned for you; for all seek their own, not the things of Jesus Christ’; or better than the company of the Lord Christ himself, in which eleven good men bore with the faithless thief Judas; or, finally, better than heaven, from which angels fell.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:20: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:27: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 21:10: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 35:22: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 13:14: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 15:10: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 7:5: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:20: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- John 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Pet 2:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Proculeianus was the Donatist bishop of Hippo. Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 1:31; Eph 4:20–21; Matt 23:3; 1 Cor 9:27; Gen 9:22–25 (Ham); Gen 21:10; Mal 1:2–3 (Rom 9:13); Gen 35:22; 2 Sam 13:14; 2 Sam 15; 2 Cor 7:5; Phil 2:20–21; John 12:6; 2 Pet 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.8 (CSEL 34.2:342–344; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-8).

## Letter 78.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:344–345
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine observes that monasteries produce both the best and the worst of men, and urges his people not to despise them for their failures.

### Latin text

Simpliciter fateor caritati uestrae coram domino deo nostro. qui testis est super animam meam, ex quo deo seruire coepi: quo modo difficile sum expertus meliores, quam qui in monasteriis profecerunt, ita non sum expertus peiores, quam qui in monasteriis ceciderunt, ita ut hinc arbitrer in Apocalypsi scriptum: Iustus iustior fiat et sordidus sordescat adhuc. quapropter etsi contristamur de aliquibus purgamentis, consolamur tamen etiam de pluribus ornamentis. nolite ergo propter amurcam, qua oculi uestri offenduntur, torcularia detestari, unde apothecae dominicae fructu olei luminosioris implentur. domini dei nostri misericordia uos aduersus omnes insidias inimici in sua pace custodiat, dilectissimi fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

I confess simply to your Charity before the Lord our God, who is witness upon my soul, that from the time I began to serve God, just as I have hardly found better men than those who have made progress in monasteries, so I have not found worse men than those who have fallen in monasteries; so that I think this is why it is written in the Apocalypse, ‘Let the righteous be more righteous still, and let the filthy be filthy still.’ Therefore, though we are saddened by some refuse, we are consoled by many more ornaments. Do not, then, because of the dregs that offend your eyes, loathe the oil presses from which the Lord’s storehouses are filled with the produce of a brighter oil. May the mercy of the Lord our God keep you in his peace against all the snares of the enemy, most beloved brothers.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 1:23: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 22:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Rev 22:11 (Old Latin form); allusion to 2 Cor 1:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 78.9 (CSEL 34.2:344–345; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-78-9).

## Letter 79.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-79-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:345–346
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine challenges a Manichaean teacher either to answer the question that defeated his predecessor Fortunatus or to leave Hippo.

### Latin text

Sine causa tergiuersaris, cum longe appareat, qualis sis. quid tecum locuti fuerint fratres, indicauerunt mihi. bene, quia non times mortem; sed eam mortem debes timere, quam tibi ipse facis talia de deo blasphemando. et quod intellegis mortem istam uisibilem, quam omnes homines norunt, separationem esse mentis a corpore, non est magnum intellegere; sed quod adiungis de uestro separationem esse boni a malo, si mens bonum est et corpus malum, qui ea commiscuit, non est bonus; dicitis autem, quia deus bonus ista commiscuit: ergo aut malus est aut malum timebat. et tu gloriaris, quia non times hominem, cum deum talem tibi fingas, qui tenebras timuit, ut commisceret bonum et malum? noli autem extolli animo, sicut scripsisti, quia uos magnos facimus eo, quod impedire uolumus uenena uestra, ne ad homines pestilentia serpat; non enim apostolus, quos canes appellat, magnos facit, cum dicit: Cauete canes, aut illos magnos faciebat, quorum sermonem dicebat serpere ut cancrum. itaque denuntio tibi in nomine Christi, ut.............. si paratus es, solue quaestionem, in qua defecit praecessor tuus Fortunatus et ita hinc ierat, ut non rediret, nisi cum suis disputatione conlata inueniret, quid contra respondere posset disputans cum fratribus; si autem ad hoc non es paratus, discede hinc et noli peruertere uias domini et illaqueare et uenenis inficere animas infirmas, ne adiuuante dextera domini nostri, quo modo non putaueras, erubescas.

### English translation (Claude)

You shuffle in vain, since it is plain from afar what kind of man you are. The brothers have told me what they discussed with you. Well and good that you do not fear death; but you ought to fear that death which you bring on yourself by blaspheming God with such things. And your understanding that this visible death, which all men know, is the separation of the mind from the body is no great understanding; but as for what you add from your own teaching, that it is the separation of good from evil: if the mind is good and the body evil, he who mixed them is not good. But you say that the good God mixed them; therefore he is either evil or he feared evil. And do you boast that you do not fear man, when you imagine for yourself a God who feared the darkness, so that he mixed good and evil? Do not be puffed up in mind, as you wrote, because we make you out to be great by wishing to prevent your poisons, so that the plague may not creep in among men. For the apostle does not make great those whom he calls dogs when he says, ‘Beware of dogs,’ nor did he make great those whose talk he said spreads like a cancer. Therefore I charge you in the name of Christ … if you are ready, solve the question at which your predecessor Fortunatus failed, and so departed from here that he would not return unless, having conferred with his own people, he should find what answer he could make in a debate with the brothers. But if you are not ready for this, depart from here, and do not pervert the ways of the Lord, and ensnare and infect weak souls with poison, lest, with the help of the right hand of our Lord, you be put to shame in a way you had not expected.

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:17: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 13:10: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Fort. (Acts of the Debate with Fortunatus the Manichaean): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to a Manichaean priest who had succeeded Fortunatus at Hippo (cf. Augustine’s Debate with Fortunatus, 392). The Manichaean doctrine that God mixed good with evil out of fear of the darkness is stated as Augustine reports it. A row of dots in the printed text after ‘that’ marks a gap or an omission; it is rendered ‘…’. Allusions: Phil 3:2; 2 Tim 2:17; Acts 13:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 79.1 (CSEL 34.2:345–346; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/76-1/#p-79-1).

## Letter 80.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:346–347
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Paulinus of Nola a hasty note by Celsus, promising a longer letter and asking for his prayers.

### Latin text

Carissimus frater Celsus cum rescripta repeteret, debitum reddere festinaui, sed uere festinaui; cum enim eum putarem adhuc aliquot dies nobiscum remoraturum, repente comperta occasione nauigii mihi pridianam suam profectionem iam nocte suggessit. quid facerem, cum eum tenere non possem et. quia ad uos, cum quibus ei melius esset, properabat, nec si possem, deberem. proinde pauca haec ilico arripui dictanda atque mittenda prolixioris epistulae me confitens debitorem, cum post reditum uenerabilium fratrum nostrorum collegarum meorum Theasi et Euodi primum uestri ex parte satiatus fuero. uberius enim ad nos in eorum pectoribus et oribus uos esse uenturos iam iamque in Christi nomine atque adiutorio speramus. cum haec scriberemus, et per unanimem filium nostrum Tagastensis ecclesiae presbyterum Fortunatianum Romam nauigaturum aliam epistulam paucis ante diebus iam dederam. nunc ergo, quod soleo, rogo, ut, quod soletis. faciatis: oretis pro nobis, ut uideat dominus humilitatem nostram et laborem nostrum et dimittat omnia peccata nostra.

### English translation (Claude)

When our dearest brother Celsus asked for a reply, I hastened to pay my debt, and truly I hastened; for while I thought he would stay with us some days longer, suddenly, having found an opportunity of a ship, he told me late at night that he was leaving the next day. What could I do, since I could not keep him, and, since he was hurrying to you, with whom he would be better off, I ought not to have done so even if I could? So I at once seized on these few words to dictate and send, confessing myself a debtor of a longer letter, when, after the return of our venerable brothers and colleagues Theasius and Evodius, I have first been satisfied with news of you. For we hope at any moment, in the name and with the help of Christ, that you will come to us more fully in their hearts and on their lips. When I was writing this, I had already given another letter a few days before to our like-minded son Fortunatianus, a presbyter of the church of Thagaste, who was about to sail to Rome. Now, then, as I am accustomed, I ask that you do as you are accustomed: pray for us, that the Lord may look on our humility and our toil and forgive all our sins.

### Scripture references

- Ps 25:18 (24:18 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Paulinus (and Therasia) of Nola. Allusion to Ps 25:18 (LXX 24:18).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 80.1 (CSEL 34.2:346–347; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-1).

## Letter 80.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:347–348
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Paulinus to explain more fully how we recognize God’s will when it calls us to change a decision that was not in itself wrong.

### Latin text

Conloqui autem uobiscum talia cupio, si dignemini, litteris. qualia conloqui possemus, si coram uestris sensibus adessemus. ecce illam quaestiunculam, quam nuper proposueram, tamquam si praesens praesenti inter dulces loquelas obderem. plane Christiano intellectu et deuotione soluisti sed nimis cursim et breuiter. posset quippe ibi aliquanto diutius et uberius habitare gratia oris tui, si, cum dixisses ita te illo. quo feliciter uteris, loco perseuerare decreuisse, ut, si quid de te aliud domino placuerit, eius uoluntatem praeferas tuae. id ipsum aliquanto apertius explicares, quonam modo uoluntatem dei, quae nostrae uoluntati praeponenda est, nouerimus. utrum tantum in ea re, quam propterea uolentes perferre debemus, quia et inuiti cogeremur — ibi enim fit quidem. quod nolumus, sed ideo nos corrigimus. ut uelimus, quia ille uult, cuius uoluntatis nec excellentiam fas est recusare nec omnipotentiam licet euitare, sicut Petrum alter cinxit et tulit, quo noluerat; uerum tamen, quo nollet, iit. sed nolens mortem subegit asperam — an et ibi, ubi est potestas non mutare sententiam, quamuis aliud occurrat. in quo potius appareat uoluntas dei ad mutandam sententiam nos uocantis. non quia nostra mala erat, sed in qua recte permaneretur. nisi ab illo in alteram uocaremur. neque enim malum fuit Abrahae nutrire et educare filium, quoad posset, quantum in ipso esset, usque ad finem uitae suae, sed repente iussus occidere mutauit utique non prius malam sententiam, sed quae mala esset, si post iussum mutata non esset. hinc quoque non dubito nihil aliud uideri tibi.

### English translation (Claude)

I long, if you will deign, to converse with you by letter about such things as we could converse about if we were present to your perceptions. Here, then, is that little question I recently put to you, as if I were raising it face to face amid sweet conversation. You solved it plainly with Christian understanding and devotion, but too hastily and briefly. The grace of your speech might have dwelt on it somewhat longer and more fully if, when you had said that you had resolved to remain in the place you enjoy so happily, in such a way that, if the Lord should be pleased with anything else concerning you, you would prefer his will to yours, you had explained somewhat more clearly how we may know the will of God, which is to be put before our will. Is it only in a matter which we ought to bear willingly because we would be forced to bear it even against our will? For there indeed something happens that we do not wish, but we correct ourselves so as to wish it, because he wills it whose will it is not right to refuse in its excellence nor possible to escape in its omnipotence; as another girded Peter and carried him where he did not wish to go, yet he went where he would not, but, though unwilling, submitted to a harsh death. Or is it also where it is in our power not to change our decision, though something else presents itself, in which the will of God appears rather to be calling us to change our decision, not because ours was bad, but because it was one in which we would rightly remain unless he called us to another? For it was not evil for Abraham to rear and bring up his son as long as he could, as far as lay in him, to the end of his life; but, suddenly commanded to kill him, he changed a decision which was certainly not bad before, but which would have been bad if it had not been changed after the command. Here too I do not doubt that you think nothing else.

### Scripture references

- John 21:18: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to John 21:18 (Peter) and Gen 22:2 (Abraham).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 80.2 (CSEL 34.2:347–348; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-2).

## Letter 80.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:348–350
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Paulinus how to discern God’s will through circumstances that call one to change a course of action.

### Latin text

Sed plerumque non uoce de caelo, non per prophetam, non per reuelationem uel somnii uel excessus mentis, quae dicitur extasis, sed rebus ipsis accidentibus et ad aliud, quam statueramus, uocantibus cogimur agnoscere dei uoluntatem aliam, quam erat nostra, tamquam si proficisci statueremus et aliquid oreretur, quod consulta de officio nostro ueritas uetaret deserere, aut decernentibus inmanere nuntiaretur aliquid, quod eadem ueritate consulta nos compelleret proficisci. ex hoc tertio genere causarum mutandae sententiae quid tibi uideatur peto mecum plenius et enodatius conloquaris. saepe nos quippe conturbat et difficile est non aliquid. quod magis faciendum erat, omittere, dum illud mutare nolumus, in quo prius permanere statueramus, non quidem malum, uerum iam ideo malum. quia id, quod potius agendum est, occurrens deseritur, quod si non occurreret, non solum sine uituperatione sed etiam cum laude in illo priore perduraretur. hic non falli difficile est, hic omnino uox prophetica praeualet: Delicta quis intellegit? hinc, oro, participem me facias cogitationum tuarum, quid in talibus uel facere soleas uel faciendum esse reperias.

### English translation (Claude)

But often it is not by a voice from heaven, nor through a prophet, nor through a revelation either in a dream or in a transport of the mind, which is called ecstasy, but by events themselves that happen and call us to something other than we had resolved, that we are forced to recognize that God’s will is other than ours: as if we had resolved to set out, and something arose which the truth, when consulted about our duty, forbade us to abandon; or, when we had decided to stay, something was reported which, when the same truth was consulted, compelled us to set out. I ask you to discuss with me more fully and clearly what you think about this third kind of reason for changing one’s decision. For it often troubles us, and it is hard not to neglect something that ought rather to be done while we are unwilling to change what we had first resolved to keep to, which is not evil in itself, but becomes evil because what ought rather to be done, when it presents itself, is abandoned; whereas if it did not present itself, one would persist in the former course not only without blame but even with praise. Here it is hard not to be deceived; here the prophetic word fully applies: ‘Who understands his faults?’ Here, I pray you, make me a sharer in your thoughts, what you are accustomed to do in such cases, or what you find ought to be done.

### Scripture references

- Ps 19:12 (18:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Ps 19:12 (LXX 18:13).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 80.3 (CSEL 34.2:348–350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-80-3).

## Letter 81.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-81-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:350–351
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome sends Augustine a short, conciliatory note by Firmus, asking for letters of love rather than disputes and referring him to his commentary on Jonah.

### Latin text

Cum a sancto fratre nostro Firmo sollicite quaererem. quid ageres, sospitem te laetus audiui. rursum cum tuas litteras non dico sperarem, sed exigerem, nesciente te de Africa profectum esse se dixit. itaque reddo tibi per eum salutationis officia, qui te unico amore complectitur, simulque obsecro. ut ignoscas pudori meo, quod diu praecipienti, ut rescriberem, negare non potui. nec ego tibi sed causae causa respondit. et si culpa est respondisse, — quaeso, ut patienter audias — multo maior est prouocasse. sed facessant istius modi querimoniae; sit inter nos pura germanitas et deinceps non quaestionum sed caritatis ad nos scripta mittamus. sancti fratres, qui nobiscum domino seruiunt, affatim te salutant. sanctos, qui tecum Christi leue trahunt iugum. praecipue sanctum et suscipiendum papam Alypium ut meo obsequio salutes, precor. incolumem te et memorem mei Christus deus noster tueatur omnipotens, domine uere sancte et beatissime papa. Si legisti librum explanationum in Ionam, puto, quod ridiculam cucurbitae non recipias quaestionem. sin autem amicus, qui me primus gladio petiit, stilo repulsus est, sit humanitatis tuae atque iustitiae accusantem reprehendere, non respondentem. in scripturarum, si placet, campo sine nostro inuicem dolore ludamus.

### English translation (Claude)

When I anxiously asked our holy brother Firmus how you were, I was glad to hear that you were well. Again, when I was not merely hoping for but demanding a letter from you, he said he had set out from Africa without your knowledge. So I send you my respectful greetings by him, who embraces you with singular love; and at the same time I beseech you to pardon my sense of shame, in that I could not refuse you when you had long been bidding me to reply. And it was not I who answered you, but cause answered cause. And if it is a fault to have answered (I ask you to hear me patiently), it is a much greater one to have provoked. But away with complaints of this kind; let there be pure brotherhood between us, and from now on let us send each other letters not of questions but of love. The holy brothers who serve the Lord with us greet you warmly. I pray you to greet with my respects the saints who bear Christ’s light yoke with you, especially the holy and venerable Pope Alypius. May Christ our God almighty keep you safe and mindful of me, my lord truly holy and most blessed pope. If you have read the book of explanations on Jonah, I think you will not take up the ridiculous question of the gourd. But if the friend who first attacked me with the sword has been repelled with the pen, let it befit your kindness and justice to rebuke the accuser, not the one who answers. Let us play, if you please, in the field of the Scriptures without hurting each other.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Jerome to Augustine (Ep. 115 in Jerome’s collection). ‘Pope’ (papa) is an honorific for any bishop here. The friend who first attacked with the sword is Rufinus. ‘Light yoke’: Matt 11:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 81.1 (CSEL 34.2:350–351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-81-1).

## Letter 82.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:351–352
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome whether he received his earlier letter and whether he has forgiven him.

### Latin text

pridem tuae caritati prolixam epistulam misi respondens illi tuae, quam per sanctum filium tuum Asterium nunc iam non solum fratrem uerum etiam collegam meum misisse te recolis. quae utrum in manus tuas peruenire meruerit, adhuc nescio, nisi quod per fratrem sincerissimum Firmum scribis, si ille, qui te primum gladio petiit, stilo repulsus est, ut sit humanitatis meae atque iustitiae accusantem reprehendere, non respondentem; hoc solo tenuissimo indicio utcumque conicio legisse te illam epistulam meam. in ea quippe deploraui tantam inter uos extitisse discordiam, de quorum tanta amicitia, quaqua uersum eam fama diffuderat. caritas fraterna gaudebat. quod non feci reprehendendo germanitatem tuam, cuius in ea re aliquam culpam me cognouisse non ausim dicere, sed dolendo humanam miseriam, cuius in amicitiis mutua caritate retinendis, quanta libet illa sit. incerta permansio est. uerum illud malueram tuis nosse rescriptis, utrum mihi ueniam, quam poposceram, dederis. quod apertius mihi intimari cupio, quamuis hilarior quidam uultus litterarum tuarum etiam hoc me impetrasse significare uideatur, si tamen post lectam illam missae sunt, quod in eis minime apparet.

### English translation (Claude)

Some time ago I sent your Charity a long letter in answer to the one which you remember sending me by your holy son Asterius, now not only my brother but also my colleague. Whether it has been fortunate enough to reach your hands I do not yet know, except that you write by our most sincere brother Firmus that, if he who first attacked you with the sword has been repelled with the pen, it should befit my kindness and justice to rebuke the accuser, not the one who answers. From this single, very slight indication I somehow conjecture that you have read that letter of mine. For in it I lamented that so great a discord had arisen between you two, whose great friendship, spread abroad by report in every direction, had been a joy to brotherly love. I did this, not to rebuke your Brotherliness, in whom I would not dare to say I had recognized any fault in that matter, but to lament human misery, in which, however great the mutual love by which friendships are held, their lasting is uncertain. But I would rather have learned from your reply whether you have granted me the pardon I asked. I wish this to be made known to me more plainly, although a certain more cheerful look in your letter seems to indicate that I have obtained this too; if, that is, it was sent after you had read mine, which does not at all appear from it.

### Translation notes

- Augustine’s reply to Jerome’s letters 72, 75, and 81 (Goldbacher’s numbering).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.1 (CSEL 34.2:351–352; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-1).

## Letter 82.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:352–354
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome how two friends can disagree frankly about Scripture without being suspected either of vanity or of flattery.

### Latin text

Petis uel potius fiducia caritatis iubes, ut in scripturarum campo sine nostro inuicem dolore ludamus. equidem, quantum ad me adtinet. serio nos ista quam ludo agere mallem. quod si hoc uerbum tibi propter facilitatem ponere placuit, ego fateor maius aliquid expeto a benignitate uirium tuarum prudentiaque tam docta et otiosa, annosa, studiosa, ingeniosa diligentia haec tibi non tantum donante uerum etiam dictante spiritu sancto, ut in magnis et laboriosis quaestionibus non tamquam ludentem in campo scripturarum sed in montibus anhelantem adiuues. si autem propter hilaritatem, quam esse inter carissimos disserentes decet, putasti dicendum esse ludamus siue illud apertum et planum sit, unde conloquimur, siue arduum atque difficile, hoc ipsum edoce, obsecro te. quonam modo adsequi ualeamus, ut, cum forte aliquid nos mouet, quod nobis etsi non cautius adtendentibus certe tardius intellegentibus non probatum est, et, quid nobis uideatur. contra conamur adserere, si hoc aliquanto securiore libertate dicamus, non incidamus in suspicionem puerilis iactantiae, quasi nostro nomini famam uiros inlustres accusando quaeramus, si autem aliquid asperum refellendi necessitate depromptum, quo tolerabile fiat, leniore circumfundamus eloquio, litum melle gladium stringere iudicemur, nisi forte ille modus est, quo utrumque hoc uitium uel uitii suspicionem caueamus, si cum doctiore amico sic disputemus, ut, quicquid dixerit, necesse sit adprobare nec quaerendi saltem causa liceat aliquantulum reluctari.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask, or rather, in the confidence of love, you bid, that we play in the field of the Scriptures without hurting each other. For my part, I would rather we treated these things seriously than in play. If you chose to use this word for the sake of ease, I confess that I seek something greater from the kindness of your powers and from your prudence, so learned and so leisured, so long-practised, studious, and gifted, a diligence to which the Holy Spirit not only grants these things but even dictates them, namely that in great and laborious questions you should help me, not as one playing in the field of the Scriptures, but as one panting among its mountains. But if you thought you should say ‘let us play’ because of the cheerfulness that befits dear friends in discussion, whether the matter we are discussing is open and plain or steep and difficult, teach me this, I beseech you: how can we manage, when something perhaps troubles us that we have not found convincing (because, if not through less care in attending, at least through slower understanding), and we try to maintain what seems to us to the contrary, that, if we say it with somewhat greater freedom, we do not fall under suspicion of childish boastfulness, as if we were seeking fame for our own name by accusing illustrious men; and, if we wrap in gentler language something harsh brought out by the necessity of refutation, so as to make it bearable, we are not judged to draw a sword smeared with honey? Unless perhaps the way to avoid both this fault and the suspicion of it is to argue with a more learned friend in such a way that we must approve whatever he says, and may not resist even a little, if only for the sake of inquiry.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.2 (CSEL 34.2:352–354; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-2).

## Letter 82.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:354–355
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine states that he believes only the canonical Scriptures to be free of all error, while other writers, however holy, are to be judged by Scripture and reason.

### Latin text

Tum uero sine ullo timore offensionis tamquam in campo luditur, sed mirum si nobis non inluditur. ego enim fateor caritati tuae solis eis scripturarum libris, qui iam canonici appellantur, didici hunc timorem honoremque deferre, ut nullum eorum auctorem scribendo errasse aliquid firmissime credam ac, si aliquid in eis offendero litteris, quod uideatur contrarium ueritati, nihil aliud quam uel mendosum esse codicem uel interpretem non adsecutum esse, quod dictum est, uel me minime intellexisse non ambigam. alios autem ita lego, ut. quanta libet sanctitate doctrinaque praepolleant. non ideo uerum putem, quia ipsi ita senserunt, sed quia mihi uel per illos auctores canonicos uel probabili ratione. quod a uero non abhorreat, persuadere potuerunt. nec te, mi frater, sentire aliud existimo; prorsus, inquam. non te arbitror sic legi tuos libros uelle tamquam prophetarum uel apostolorum, de quorum scriptis, quod omni errore careant, dubitare nefarium est. absit hoc a pia humilitate et ueraci de temet ipso cogitatione, qua nisi esses praeditus, non utique diceres: Utinam mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus.

### English translation (Claude)

Then indeed one plays without any fear of offence, as in a field; but it would be strange if we were not being played with. For I confess to your Charity that I have learned to give this fear and honour only to those books of the Scriptures which are now called canonical, so that I believe most firmly that none of their authors erred in anything in writing. And if I come upon anything in those writings that seems contrary to the truth, I do not doubt that either the manuscript is faulty, or the translator has not grasped what was said, or I have not understood it at all. But others I read in such a way that, however much they excel in holiness and learning, I do not think a thing true because they thought so, but because they have been able to persuade me, either through those canonical authors or by probable reason, that it does not depart from the truth. Nor do I think, my brother, that you think otherwise; I do not suppose, I say, that you wish your books to be read like those of the prophets or apostles, of whose writings it is wicked to doubt that they are free of all error. Far be this from your devout humility and your truthful estimate of yourself; for if you were not endowed with it, you certainly would not say, ‘Would that we were worthy of your embrace, and that by talking together we might either teach or learn something.’

### Translation notes

- A classic statement of Augustine’s view of the authority of the canonical Scriptures; translated as written. Augustine again quotes Jerome’s Ep. 72.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.3 (CSEL 34.2:354–355; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-3).

## Letter 82.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:355
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if Paul’s account of rebuking Peter was a pretence, no statement of Scripture could be trusted.

### Latin text

Quod si te ipsum consideratione uitae ac morum tuorum non simulate, non fallaciter dixisse credo, quanto magis aequum est me credere apostolum Paulum non aliud sensisse, quam scripserit, ubi ait de Petro et Barnaba: Cum uiderem, quia non recte ingrediuntur ad ueritatem euangelii, dixi Petro coram omnibus: Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non iudaice uiuis, quo modo gentes cogis iudaizare? de quo enim certus sim, quod me scribendo uel loquendo non fallat, si fallebat apostolus filios suos, quos iterum parturiebat, donec in eis Christus, id est ueritas formaretur, quibus cum praemisisset dicens: Quae autem scribo uobis, ecce coram deo, quia non mentior. non tamen ueraciter scribebat, sed nescio qua dispensatoria simulatione fallebat, uidisse se Petrum et Barnaban non recte ingredientes ad ueritatem euangelii ac Petro in faciem restitisse non ob aliud, nisi quod gentes cogeret iudaizare?

### English translation (Claude)

If, considering your life and character, I believe that you said this of yourself without pretence and without deceit, how much more just is it for me to believe that the apostle Paul did not mean anything other than he wrote where he says of Peter and Barnabas: ‘When I saw that they were not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live as the Gentiles do and not as the Jews, how do you compel the Gentiles to live as Jews?”’ For of whom could I be sure that he does not deceive me in writing or speaking, if the apostle was deceiving his sons, with whom he was again in labour until Christ, that is, the truth, should be formed in them? Having said to them beforehand, ‘Now in what I write to you, behold, before God, I do not lie,’ was he nonetheless not writing truthfully, but deceiving them by some pretence of arrangement or other, when he said that he had seen Peter and Barnabas not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, and had withstood Peter to his face for no other reason than that he was compelling the Gentiles to live as Jews?

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:19: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gal 2:14 and Gal 1:20; allusion to Gal 4:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.4 (CSEL 34.2:355; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-4).

## Letter 82.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:355–356
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the idea that it is better to think Paul wrote falsely than that Peter erred, since by that logic the Gospels and Kings would lie about Peter’s denial and David’s sin.

### Latin text

At enim satius est credere apostolum Paulum aliquid non uere scripsisse, quam apostolum Petrum non recte aliquid egisse. hoc si ita est, dicamus, quod absit, satius esse credere mentiri euangelium, quam negatum esse a Petro Christum, et mentiri regnorum librum, quam tantum prophetam a domino deo tam excellenter electum et in concupiscenda atque abducenda uxore aliena commisisse adulterium et in marito eius necando tam horrendum homicidium. immo uero sanctam scripturam in summo et caelesti auctoritatis culmine conlocatam de ueritate eius certus ac securus legam et in ea homines uel adprobatos uel emendatos uel damnatos ueraciter discam potius, quam, facta humana dum in quibusdam laudabilis excellentiae personis aliquando credere timeo reprehendenda, ipsa diuina eloquia mihi sint ubique suspecta.

### English translation (Claude)

‘But it is better to believe that the apostle Paul wrote something untrue than that the apostle Peter did something wrong.’ If this is so, let us say (God forbid!) that it is better to believe that the Gospel lies than that Christ was denied by Peter, and that the book of Kingdoms lies rather than that so great a prophet, so excellently chosen by the Lord God, committed adultery in desiring and taking away another man’s wife, and so horrible a murder in killing her husband. No, rather I will read the holy Scripture, set on the highest and heavenly summit of authority, certain and secure of its truth, and in it I will learn truthfully of men approved, corrected, or condemned, rather than, while I fear to believe that human deeds are sometimes blameworthy in certain persons of praiseworthy excellence, have the divine words themselves everywhere suspect.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:70: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 11:4: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 11:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Peter’s denial (Matt 26:69–75) and David’s adultery and murder (2 Sam 11).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.5 (CSEL 34.2:355–356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-5).

## Letter 82.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:356
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that admitting deliberate falsehood in the apostles would hand the Manichaeans an argument against Scripture.

### Latin text

Manichaei plurima diuinarum scripturarum, quibus eorum nefarius error clarissima sententiarum perspicuitate conuincitur, quia in alium sensum detorquere non possunt, falsa esse contendunt, ita tamen, ut eandem falsitatem non scribentibus apostolis tribuant sed nescio quibus codicum corruptoribus. quod tamen quia nec pluribus siue antiquioribus exemplaribus nec praecedentis linguae auctoritate, unde Latini libri interpretati sunt, probare aliquando potuerunt, notissima omnibus ueritate superati confusique discedunt. itane non intellegit sancta prudentia tua, quanta malitiae illorum patescat occasio, si non ab aliis. apostolicas litteras esse falsatas, sed ipsos apostolos falsa scripsisse dicamus?

### English translation (Claude)

The Manichaeans maintain that very many passages of the divine Scriptures, by which their wicked error is refuted with the clearest plainness of meaning, are false, because they cannot twist them into another sense; yet they attribute this falsity not to the apostles who wrote but to some corrupters of the manuscripts or other. But since they have never been able to prove this either from more numerous or older copies or from the authority of the original language from which the Latin books were translated, they go away overcome and confounded by the truth, which is well known to all. Does not your holy Prudence understand, then, how great an opening is given to their malice if we say, not that the apostolic writings were falsified by others, but that the apostles themselves wrote falsehoods?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.6 (CSEL 34.2:356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-6).

## Letter 82.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:356–357
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that either Paul lied in Galatians or Peter really acted wrongly, and he chooses to believe Paul wrote the truth.

### Latin text

Non est, inquis, credibile hoc in Petro Paulum, quod ipse Paulus fecerat, arguisse. non nunc quaero, quid fecerit: quid scripserit, quaero. hoc ad quaestionem. quam suscepi, maxime pertinet, ut ueritas diuinarum scripturarum ad nostram fidem aedificandam memoriae commendata non a quibuslibet sed ab ipsis apostolis ac per hoc in canonicum auctoritatis culmen recepta ex omni parte uerax atque indubitanda persistat. nam si hoc fecit Petrus, quod facere debuit, mentitus est Paulus, quod eum uiderit non recte ingredientem ad ueritatem euangelii. quisquis enim hoc facit, quod facere debet, recte utique facit et ideo falsum de illo dicit, qui dicit eum non recte fecisse, quod eum nouit facere debuisse. si autem uerum scripsit Paulus, uerum est, quod Petrus non recte tunc ingrediebatur ad ueritatem euangelii; id ergo faciebat, quod facere non debebat. et si tale aliquid Paulus ipse iam fecerat, correctum potius etiam ipsum credam coapostoli sui correctionem non potuisse neglegere, quam mendaciter aliquid in sua epistula posuisse et epistula qualibet. quanto magis in illa. in qua praelocutus ait: Quae autem scribo uobis, ecce coram deo. quia non mentior.

### English translation (Claude)

‘It is not credible,’ you say, ‘that Paul censured in Peter what Paul himself had done.’ I am not now asking what he did; I am asking what he wrote. This is what most concerns the question I have taken up: that the truth of the divine Scriptures, committed to memory for the building up of our faith, not by just anyone but by the apostles themselves, and therefore received into the canonical summit of authority, should remain in every part truthful and beyond doubt. For if Peter did what he ought to have done, Paul lied in saying that he had seen him not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel. For whoever does what he ought to do certainly does right; and therefore he says what is false about him who says that he did not do right, when he knows he did what he ought to have done. But if Paul wrote the truth, it is true that Peter was not then walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel; he was therefore doing what he ought not to have done. And if Paul himself had already done something of the kind, I would rather believe that he too had been corrected and could not neglect to correct his fellow apostle, than that he set down anything falsely in his letter, in any letter at all, and how much more in that one in which he said beforehand, ‘Now in what I write to you, behold, before God, I do not lie.’

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Gal 1:20; allusion to Gal 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.7 (CSEL 34.2:356–357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-7).

## Letter 82.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:357–358
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Peter wrongly implied the old rites were needed for salvation, while Paul kept them only to show they were not idolatry but God-given shadows of what was to come.

### Latin text

Ego quidem illud Petrum sic egisse credo, ut gentes cogeret iudaizare. hoc enim lego scripsisse Paulum, quem mentitum esse non credo. et ideo non recte agebat hoc Petrus; erat enim contra euangelii ueritatem, ut putarent, qui credebant in Christum, sine illis ueteribus sacramentis saluos se esse non posse. hoc enim contendebant Antiochiae. qui ex circumcisione crediderant, contra quos Paulus perseueranter acriterque confligit. ipsum uero Paulum non ad hoc id egisse, quod uel Timotheum circumcidit uel Cenchris uotum persoluit uel Hierosolymis a Iacobo admonitus cum eis, qui uouerant, legitima illa celebranda suscepit, ut putari uideretur per ea sacramenta etiam Christianam salutem dari. sed ne illa, quae prioribus, ut congruebat, temporibus in umbris rerum futurarum deus fieri iusserat, tamquam idolatriam gentilium damnare crederetur. hoc est enim, quod illi Iacobus ait auditum de illo esse, quod discissionem doceat a Moyse, quod utique nefas est, ut credentes in Christum discindantur a propheta Christi tamquam eius doctrinam detestantes atque damnantes, de quo ipse Christus dicit: Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit.

### English translation (Claude)

I, for my part, believe that Peter acted in such a way as to compel the Gentiles to live as Jews. For I read that Paul wrote this, and I do not believe that he lied. And therefore Peter was not acting rightly in this; for it was contrary to the truth of the gospel that those who believed in Christ should think that they could not be saved without those old sacraments. For this is what those who had believed from the circumcision were contending at Antioch, against whom Paul fought persistently and fiercely. But Paul himself did not do what he did, whether in circumcising Timothy, or in fulfilling a vow at Cenchreae, or in undertaking at Jerusalem, at James’s advice, to celebrate those legal rites with those who had made a vow, in order that it might be thought that Christian salvation too was given through those sacraments, but so that he might not be believed to condemn, like the idolatry of the Gentiles, those things which God had commanded to be done in the former times, as was fitting, as shadows of things to come. For this is what James told him had been heard about him, that he taught separation from Moses; which is certainly wicked, that those who believe in Christ should be separated from Christ’s prophet, as if detesting and condemning the teaching of him of whom Christ himself says, ‘If you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me.’

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 16:3: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 18:18: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 21:26: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 21:21: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:46: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Acts 16:3; 18:18; 21:21–26; Col 2:17; Heb 10:1; quotation of John 5:46.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.8 (CSEL 34.2:357–358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-8).

## Letter 82.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:358–360
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from James’s advice in Acts 21 that Paul kept the rites to refute the slander that he condemned the law as sacrilegious, not to teach that they were needed for salvation.

### Latin text

Adtende enim, obsecro, ipsa uerba Iacobi: Vides, inquit. frater, quot milia sunt in Iudaea. qui crediderunt in Christum, et hi omnes aemulatores sunt legis. audierunt autem de te, quia discissionem doces a Moyse eorum, qui per gentes sunt, Iudaeorum dicens non debere circumcidere eos filios suos neque secundum consuetudinem ingredi. quid ergo est? utique oportet conuenire multitudinem; audient enim te superuenisse. hoc ergo fac, quod tibi dicimus. sunt nobis uiri quattuor uotum habentes super se. his adsumptis sanctifica te cum ipsis et inpende in eos, ut radant capita, et scient omnes, quia quae de te audierunt, falsa sunt, sed sequeris et ipse custodiens legem. de gentibus autem, qui crediderunt, nos mandauimus iudicantes nihil eius modi seruare illos, nisi ut obseruent ab idolis immolato et a sanguine et a fornicatione. non, ut opinor, obscurum est et Iacobum hoc ideo monuisse, ut scirent falsa esse, quae de illo audierant hi, qui, cum in Christum ex Iudaeis credidissent. tamen aemulatores erant legis, ne per doctrinam Christi uelut sacrilega nec deo mandante conscripta damnari putarentur. quae per Moysen patribus fuerant ministrata. hoc enim de Paulo iactauerant non illi, qui intellegebant, quo animo a Iudaeis fidelibus obseruari tunc ista deberent propter commendandam scilicet auctoritatem diuinam et sacramentorum illorum propheticam sanctitatem, non propter adipiscendam salutem. quae iam in Christo reuelabatur et per baptismi sacramentum ministrabatur, sed illi hoc de Paulo sparserant, qui sic ea uolebant obseruari, tamquam sine his in euangelio salus credentibus esse non posset. ipsum enim senserant uehementissimum gratiae praedicatorem et intentioni eorum maxime aduersum docentem non per illa hominem iustificari sed per gratiam Iesu Christi, cuius praenuntiandae causa illae umbrae in lege mandatae sunt. et ideo illi inuidiam et persecutionem concitare molientes tamquam inimicum legis mandatorumque diuinorum criminabantur, cuius falsae criminationis inuidiam congruentius deuitare non posset, quam ut ea ipse celebraret. quae damnare tamquam sacrilega putabatur, atque ita ostenderet nec Iudaeos tunc ab eis tamquam a nefariis prohibendos nec gentiles ad ea tamquam ad necessaria compellendos.

### English translation (Claude)

For notice, I beseech you, the very words of James: ‘You see, brother,’ he says, ‘how many thousands there are in Judea who have believed in Christ, and they are all zealous for the law. And they have heard about you, that you teach the Jews who are among the Gentiles separation from Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children nor walk according to the custom. What then? The multitude must certainly come together, for they will hear that you have come. Do therefore what we tell you. We have four men who have a vow on them; take them, purify yourself with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads; and all will know that what they have heard about you is false, but that you yourself also follow, keeping the law. But as for the Gentiles who have believed, we have written, judging that they should observe nothing of the kind, except that they keep themselves from what is sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from sexual immorality.’ It is not obscure, I think, that James gave this advice so that those who, though they had believed in Christ from among the Jews, were still zealous for the law, might know that what they had heard about Paul was false, lest they should think that through the teaching of Christ the things ministered to the fathers through Moses were condemned as sacrilegious and not written at God’s command. For this charge had been spread about Paul not by those who understood in what spirit these things ought then to be observed by believing Jews, namely to commend the divine authority and the prophetic holiness of those sacraments, not to obtain salvation, which was now revealed in Christ and ministered through the sacrament of baptism; but by those who wished them to be observed as if without them there could be no salvation for believers in the gospel. For they had found him a most vehement preacher of grace, teaching, most contrary to their aim, that a man is justified not by those things but by the grace of Jesus Christ, to foretell which those shadows were commanded in the law. And therefore, striving to stir up hatred and persecution against him, they accused him as an enemy of the law and of the divine commandments; and he could not more fittingly avoid the odium of this false accusation than by himself celebrating the things he was thought to condemn as sacrilegious, and so showing that neither were the Jews then to be forbidden them as wicked, nor the Gentiles to be compelled to them as necessary.

### Scripture references

- Acts 21:20: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:21: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:24: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 21:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Acts 21:20–25 (fornicatio rendered ‘sexual immorality’).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.9 (CSEL 34.2:358–360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-9).

## Letter 82.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:360–361
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that the apostolic decree forbade compelling Gentiles to live as Jews but did not forbid Jews to keep their customs, so Paul rightly held Peter to it.

### Latin text

Nam si re uera sic ea reprobaret, quem ad modum de illo auditum erat, et ideo celebranda susciperet, ut actione simulata suam posset occultare sententiam, non ei diceret Iacobus: Et scient omnes, sed diceret et putabunt omnes quoniam. quae de te audierunt, falsa sunt, praesertim quia in ipsis Hierosolymis apostoli iam decreuerant, ne quisquam gentes cogeret iudaizare, non autem decreuerant. ne quisquam tunc Iudaeos iudaizare prohiberet, quamuis etiam ipsos iam doctrina Christiana non cogeret. proinde si post hoc apostolorum decretum Petrus habuit illam in Antiochia simulationem. qua gentes cogeret iudaizare, quoniam nec ipse cogebatur, quamuis propter commendanda eloquia dei. quae Iudaeis sunt credita, non prohibebatur, quid mirum si constringebat eum Paulus libere adserere, quod cum ceteris apostolis se Hierosolymis decreuisse meminerat?

### English translation (Claude)

For if he really disapproved of them as had been heard of him, and undertook to celebrate them in order to hide his opinion by a pretended action, James would not have said to him, ‘And all will know,’ but, ‘And all will think that what they have heard about you is false’; especially since at Jerusalem itself the apostles had already decreed that no one should compel the Gentiles to live as Jews, but had not decreed that no one should then forbid the Jews to live as Jews, although Christian teaching no longer compelled even them. Accordingly, if after this decree of the apostles Peter engaged in that pretence at Antioch by which he compelled the Gentiles to live as Jews, though he himself was not compelled to, although he was not forbidden to, for the sake of commending the oracles of God which were entrusted to the Jews, what wonder is it if Paul pressed him to assert freely what he remembered he had decreed with the other apostles at Jerusalem?

### Scripture references

- Acts 21:24: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:28: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 3:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Acts 15:19–29 and Rom 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.10 (CSEL 34.2:360–361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-10).

## Letter 82.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:361–362
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Peter shared Paul’s view, and that Paul rebuked not his belief but his pretence, which implied that circumcision was necessary for salvation.

### Latin text

Si autem hoc, quod magis arbitror, ante illud Hierosolymitanum concilium Petrus fecit, nec sic mirum est, quod eum nolebat Paulus non timide obtegere, sed fidenter adserere, quod eum pariter sentire iam nouerat, siue quod cum eo contulerat euangelium siue quod in Cornelii centurionis uocatione etiam diuinitus eum de hac re admonitum acceperat siue quod ante, quam illi. quos timuerat, uenissent Antiochiam, cum gentibus eum conuesci uiderat. neque enim negamus in hac sententia fuisse iam Petrum, in qua et Paulus fuit. non itaque tunc eum, quid in ea re uerum esset, docebat, sed eius simulationem, qua gentes iudaizare cogebantur, arguebat non ob aliud, nisi quia sic illa omnia simulatoria gerebantur, tamquam uerum esset, quod dicebant illi, qui sine circumcisione praeputii atque aliis obseruationibus umbrae futurorum putabant credentes saluos esse non posse.

### English translation (Claude)

But if, as I rather think, Peter did this before that council at Jerusalem, even so it is no wonder that Paul wished him not to cover timidly but to assert confidently what he already knew Peter held equally with him, whether because he had conferred with him about the gospel, or because he knew that Peter had been divinely admonished on this matter at the calling of the centurion Cornelius, or because he had seen him eating with the Gentiles before those whom he feared came to Antioch. For we do not deny that Peter already held the same opinion as Paul. So Paul was not then teaching him what was true in this matter, but was censuring his pretence, by which the Gentiles were being compelled to live as Jews, for no other reason than that all those pretended actions were being done as if what was said by those was true who thought that believers could not be saved without circumcision of the foreskin and the other observances that were shadows of things to come.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 10:28: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:12: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Gal 2:2; Acts 10; Gal 2:12; Col 2:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.11 (CSEL 34.2:361–362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-11).

## Letter 82.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:362–363
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul circumcised Timothy to show circumcision was not idolatry, but refused to circumcise Titus so as not to imply it was necessary for salvation.

### Latin text

Ergo et Timotheum propterea circumcidit, ne Iudaeis et maxime cognationi eius maternae sic uiderentur, qui ex gentibus in Christum crediderant, detestari circumcisionem, sicut idolatria detestanda est, cum illam deus fieri praeceperit. hanc satanas persuaserit; et Titum propterea non circumcidit. ne occasionem daret eis, qui sine illa circumcisione dicebant credentes saluos esse non posse, et ad deceptionem gentium hoc etiam Paulum sentire iactarent. quod ipse satis significat. ubi ait: Sed neque Titus, qui mecum erat. cum esset Graecus, compulsus est circumcidi propter subintroductos autem falsos fratres, qui subintroierant perscrutari libertatem nostram. ut nos in seruitutem redigerent, quibus nec ad horam cessimus subiectione, ut ueritas euangelii permaneat ad uos. hic apparet. quid eos captare intellexerit, ut non faceret, quod in Timotheo fecerat, quod ea libertate facere poterat, qua ostenderet illa sacramenta nec tamquam necessaria debere appeti nec tamquam sacrilega debere damnari.

### English translation (Claude)

So he circumcised Timothy for this reason, that it might not seem to the Jews, and especially to his mother’s kin, that those who had believed in Christ from the Gentiles detested circumcision as idolatry is to be detested, since God commanded the one and Satan prompted the other. And he did not circumcise Titus for this reason, that he might not give an opening to those who said that believers could not be saved without that circumcision, and who, to deceive the Gentiles, boasted that Paul too held this. He indicates this clearly enough where he says: ‘But not even Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised, because of false brethren secretly brought in, who had slipped in to spy out our liberty, that they might bring us into bondage; to whom we did not yield in subjection even for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might remain with you.’ Here it appears what he understood them to be angling for, so that he did not do what he had done in the case of Timothy, which he could do in that liberty by which he showed that those sacraments ought neither to be sought as necessary nor condemned as sacrilegious.

### Scripture references

- Acts 16:3: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Acts 16:1–3; quotation of Gal 2:3–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.12 (CSEL 34.2:362–363; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-12).

## Letter 82.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:363
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies that he fears less the philosophers’ category of indifferent acts than Jerome’s comparison of the apostles to lying advocates.

### Latin text

Sed cauendum est uidelicet in hac disputatione, ne sicut philosophi quaedam facta hominum media dicamus inter recte factum et peccatum, quae neque in recte factis neque in peccatis numerentur, et urgeamur eo, quod obseruare legis caeremonias non potest esse indifferens sed aut bonum aut malum, ut, si bonum dixerimus, eas nos quoque obseruare cogamur, si autem malum, non uere sed simulate ab apostolis obseruatas esse credamus. ego uero apostolis non tam exemplum philosophorum timeo, quando et illi in sua disputatione ueri aliquid dicunt, quam forensium aduocatorum, quando in alienarum causarum actione mentiuntur. quorum similitudo si in ipsa expositione epistulae ad Galatas ad confirmandam simulationem Petri et Pauli putata est decenter induci, quid ego apud te timeam nomen philosophorum, qui non propterea uani sunt, quia omnia falsa dicunt, sed quia et falsis plerisque confidunt et, ubi uera inueniuntur dicere, a Christi gratia, qui est ipsa ueritas, alieni sunt?

### English translation (Claude)

But in this discussion, you say, we must take care not to say, like the philosophers, that some human acts are intermediate between right action and sin, to be counted neither among right actions nor among sins; and we are pressed by the argument that to observe the ceremonies of the law cannot be indifferent, but is either good or evil, so that, if we call it good, we too are compelled to observe them, and if evil, we must believe that the apostles observed them not truly but in pretence. For my part, I fear for the apostles not so much the example of the philosophers, since they too say something true in their discussions, as that of advocates in the courts, when they lie in pleading the cases of others. If a comparison with these was thought fitting to introduce, in the very exposition of the Letter to the Galatians, to support the pretence of Peter and Paul, why should I fear before you the name of the philosophers, who are not foolish because everything they say is false, but because they trust in many falsehoods, and, where they are found to say true things, they are strangers to the grace of Christ, who is the Truth itself?

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome’s Commentary on Galatians compared Paul’s conduct to the tactics of advocates. Allusion to John 14:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.13 (CSEL 34.2:363; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-13).

## Letter 82.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:363–364
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the old rites were neither good (since they do not justify) nor evil (since God commanded them), comparing the varying custom of fasting on Saturday.

### Latin text

Cur autem non dicam praecepta illa ueterum sacramentorum nec bona esse, quia non eis homines iustificantur, umbrae sunt enim praenuntiantes gratiam, qua iustificamur, nec tamen mala, quia diuinitus praecepta sunt tempori personisque congruentia, cum me adiuuet etiam prophetica sententia, qua dicit deus se illi populo dedisse praecepta non bona? forte enim propterea non dixit mala sed tantum non bona, id est non talia, ut illis homines boni fiant aut sine illis boni non fiant. uellem me doceret benigna sinceritas tua, utrum simulate quisquam sanctus orientalis, cum Romam uenerit, ieiunet sabbato excepto illo die paschalis uigiliae. quod si malum esse dixerimus, non solum Romanam ecclesiam sed etiam multa ei uicina et aliquanto remotiora damnabimus, ubi mos idem tenetur et manet. si autem non ieiunare sabbato malum putauerimus, tot ecclesias orientis et multo maiorem orbis Christiani partem qua temeritate criminabimur! placetne tibi, ut medium quiddam esse dicamus, quod tamen acceptabile sit ei. qui hoc non simulate sed congruenti societate atque obseruantia fecerit? et tamen nihil inde legimus in canonicis libris praeceptum esse Christianis. quanto magis illud malum dicere non audeo, quod deum praecepisse ipsa Christiana fide negare non possum, qua didici non eo me iustificari sed gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum!

### English translation (Claude)

Why should I not say that those precepts of the old sacraments are neither good, since men are not justified by them (for they are shadows foretelling the grace by which we are justified), nor yet evil, since they were divinely commanded as suited to their time and persons, when the prophetic saying also helps me, in which God says that he gave that people precepts that were not good? For perhaps he did not say ‘evil’ but only ‘not good’ for this reason, that is, not such that men become good by them, or do not become good without them. I would like your kind sincerity to teach me whether any holy man from the East, when he comes to Rome, fasts on the sabbath in pretence, except on that day of the Easter vigil. If we call this evil, we shall condemn not only the Roman church but also many churches near it and some further away, where the same custom is kept and continues. But if we think it evil not to fast on the sabbath, with what rashness shall we accuse so many churches of the East and the much greater part of the Christian world! Do you agree that we should call it something intermediate, which is nevertheless acceptable to one who does it not in pretence but out of fitting fellowship and observance? And yet we read nothing in the canonical books commanding Christians on this point. How much less do I dare to call evil what I cannot deny God commanded, by that very Christian faith by which I learned that I am justified not by it but by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord!

### Scripture references

- Ezek 20:25: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ezek 20:25; Rom 7:25. The Roman church fasted on Saturday; most Eastern churches did not.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.14 (CSEL 34.2:363–364; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-14).

## Letter 82.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:364–366
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the old rites were to be read, not practised, by Christians, but were allowed to fade out honourably among Jewish believers; Peter erred by pretence, while Paul acted truthfully.

### Latin text

Dico ergo circumcisionem praeputii et cetera huius modi priori populo per testamentum, quod uetus dicitur, diuinitus data ad significationem futurorum. quae per Christum oportebat impleri. quibus aduenientibus remansisse illa Christianis legenda tantum ad intellegentiam praemissae prophetiae, non autem necessario facienda, quasi adhuc expectandum esset, ut ueniret fidei reuelatio, quae his significabatur esse uentura. sed quamuis gentibus inponenda non essent, non tamen sic debuisse auferri a consuetudine Iudaeorum tamquam detestanda atque damnanda. sensim proinde atque paulatim feruente sane praedicatione gratiae Christi, qua sola nossent credentes se iustificari saluosque fieri, non illis umbris rerum ante futurarum tunc iam uenientium atque praesentium, ut in illorum Iudaeorum uocatione, quos praesentia carnis domini et apostolica tempora sic inuenerant, omnis illa actio consumeretur umbrarum, hoc ei suffecisse ad commendationem, ut non tamquam detestanda et similis idolatriae uitaretur, ultra uero non haberet progressum, ne putaretur necessaria, tamquam uel ab illa salus esset uel sine illa esse non posset, quod putauerunt haeretici, qui dum uolunt et Iudaei esse et Christiani, nec Iudaei nec Christiani esse potuerunt. quorum sententiam mihi cauendam, quamuis in ea numquam fuerim, tamen beniuolentissime admonere dignatus es. in cuius sententiae non consensionem sed simulationem timore Petrus inciderat, ut de illo Paulus uerissime scriberet, quod eum uidisset non recte ingredientem ad ueritatem euangelii, eique uerissime diceret, quod gentes iudaizare cogebat. quod Paulus utique non cogebat ob hoc illa uetera ueraciter, ubi opus esset, obseruans, ut damnanda non esse monstraret, praedicans tamen instanter non eis sed reuelata gratia fidei saluos fieri fideles, ne ad ea quemquam uelut necessaria suscipienda compelleret. sic autem credo apostolum Paulum ueraciter cuncta illa gessisse nec tamen nunc quemquam factum ex Iudaeo Christianum uel cogo uel sino talia ueraciter celebrare. sicut nec tu, cui uidetur Paulus ea simulasse, cogis istum uel sinis talia simulare.

### English translation (Claude)

I say, then, that circumcision of the foreskin and other things of this kind were divinely given to the former people through the covenant called old, to signify things to come which were to be fulfilled through Christ; that when these came, those things remained for Christians only to be read for the understanding of the prophecy that went before, not necessarily to be done, as if we still had to wait for the coming of the revelation of faith which they signified would come. But although they were not to be imposed on the Gentiles, they ought not, for all that, to have been taken away from the custom of the Jews as if they were to be detested and condemned. Gradually, therefore, and little by little, while the preaching of the grace of Christ was indeed glowing hot, by which alone believers were to know that they are justified and saved, and not by those shadows of things formerly to come and now coming and present, so that in the calling of those Jews whom the bodily presence of the Lord and the apostolic times found in that state, the whole practice of the shadows might be used up, it was enough for its commendation that it should not be shunned as detestable and like idolatry; but it should go no further, lest it be thought necessary, as if salvation came from it or could not be without it. This the heretics thought, who, wishing to be both Jews and Christians, could be neither Jews nor Christians. You were kind enough most benevolently to warn me to beware of their opinion, though I was never in it. Into this opinion Peter had fallen, not by agreement but by pretence out of fear, so that Paul wrote most truly of him that he had seen him not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, and said to him most truly that he was compelling the Gentiles to live as Jews. Paul certainly did not compel them, for he observed those old things truthfully where there was need, so as to show that they were not to be condemned, yet preached insistently that the faithful are saved not by them but by the revealed grace of faith, so that he might not compel anyone to undertake them as necessary. Thus I believe that the apostle Paul did all those things truthfully, and yet now I neither compel nor allow anyone who has become a Christian from among the Jews to celebrate such things truthfully, just as you, who think that Paul pretended them, neither compel nor allow such a person to pretend them.

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:23: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine answers Jerome’s charge (Ep. 75.13) that his view revived the Ebionite heresy. Allusion to Gal 3:23; Gal 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.15 (CSEL 34.2:364–366; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-15).

## Letter 82.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:366–368
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns Jerome’s charge back on him and compares the old rites to a dead body that the apostles honourably escorted to burial but that no Christian may now disturb.

### Latin text

An uis, ut etiam ego dicam hanc esse summam quaestionis, immo sententiae tuae, ut post euangelium Christi bene faciant credentes Iudaei, si sacrificia offerant. quae obtulit Paulus, si filios circumcidant, si sabbatum obseruent, ut Paulus in Timotheo et omnes obseruauere Iudaei, dum modo haec simulate ac fallaciter agant? hoc si ita est, non iam in haeresin Hebionis uel eorum, quos uulgo Nazaraeos nuncupant, uel quamlibet aliam ueterem sed in nescio quam nouam delabimur, quae sit eo perniciosior, quo non errore sed proposito est ac uoluntate fallaci. quod si respondes, ut te ab hac purges sententia. tunc apostolos ista laudabiliter simulasse. ne scandalizarentur infirmi, qui ex Iudaeis multi crediderant et ea respuenda nondum intellegebant, nunc uero confirmata per tot gentes doctrina gratiae Christianae, confirmata etiam per omnes Christi ecclesias lectione legis et prophetarum, quo modo haec intellegenda, non obseruanda recitentur, quisquis ea simulando agere uoluerit, insanire, cur mihi non licet dicere apostolum Paulum et alios rectae fidei Christianos tunc illa uetera sacramenta paululum obseruando ueraciter commendare debuisse, ne putarentur illae propheticae significationis obseruationes a piissimis patribus custoditae tamquam sacrilegia diabolica a posteris detestatae? iam enim cum uenisset fides, quae prius illis obseruationibus praenuntiata post mortem et resurrectionem domini reuelata est, amiserant tamquam uitam officii sui. uerum tamen sicut defuncta corpora necessariorum deducenda erant quodam modo ad sepulturam nec simulate sed religiose, non autem deserenda continuo uel inimicorum obtrectationibus tamquam canum morsibus proicienda. proinde nunc quisquis Christianorum, quamuis sit ex Iudaeis, similiter ea celebrare uoluerit, tamquam sopitos cineres eruens non erit pius deductor uel baiulus corporis sed impius sepulturae uiolator.

### English translation (Claude)

Or do you wish me too to say that this is the sum of the question, or rather of your opinion: that after the gospel of Christ the believing Jews do well if they offer the sacrifices which Paul offered, if they circumcise their sons, if they keep the sabbath, as Paul did in the case of Timothy and as all the Jews observed, provided only that they do these things in pretence and deceitfully? If this is so, we slide no longer into the heresy of Ebion, or of those commonly called Nazarenes, or into any other old heresy, but into some new one, which is the more pernicious in that it comes not from error but from deliberate and deceitful will. But if, to clear yourself of this opinion, you answer that the apostles then commendably pretended these things so that the weak, many of whom had believed from among the Jews and did not yet understand that these things were to be rejected, should not be offended, but that now, when the doctrine of Christian grace has been established through so many nations, and when the reading of the law and the prophets has also been established through all the churches of Christ, showing how these things are read to be understood, not to be observed, whoever wishes to do them in pretence is mad, why may I not say that the apostle Paul and other Christians of right faith ought then to have commended those old sacraments truthfully by observing them for a little while, lest those observances of prophetic significance, kept by most godly fathers, should be thought to be detested by their descendants as diabolical sacrileges? For once the faith had come, which, foretold beforehand by those observances, was revealed after the death and resurrection of the Lord, they had lost, as it were, the life of their function. Yet just as the dead bodies of kinsfolk had in some way to be escorted to burial, not in pretence but religiously, and not abandoned at once or thrown to the slanders of enemies as to the bites of dogs, so now any Christian, even one from among the Jews, who wishes to celebrate them in the same way, will be, as it were, stirring up ashes laid to rest, not a devout escort or bearer of the body but an impious violator of the tomb.

### Translation notes

- Augustine echoes Jerome’s wording in Ep. 75.13. The image of the burial of the law became well known.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.16 (CSEL 34.2:366–368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-16).

## Letter 82.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:368–369
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine admits he should have added that the old rites were harmless only at the beginning, refers Jerome to his work against Faustus, and affirms that Jewish Christians may not now keep them.

### Latin text

Fateor sane in eo, quod epistula mea continet, quod ideo sacramenta Iudaeorum Paulus celebranda susceperat, cum iam Christi esset apostolus, ut doceret non esse perniciosa his, qui ea uellent, sicut a parentibus per legem acceperant. custodire, minus me posuisse illo dum taxat tempore, quo primum fidei gratia reuelata est tunc enim hoc non erat perniciosum. progressu uero temporis illae obseruationes ab omnibus Christianis desererentur, ne, si tunc fierent, non discerneretur, quod deus populo suo per Moysen praecepit. ab eo, quod in templis daemoniorum spiritus inmundus instituit. proinde potius culpanda est neglegentia mea, quia hoc non addidi, quam obiurgatio tua. uerum tamen longe ante. quam tuas litteras accepissem, scribens contra Faustum Manichaeum quo modo eundem locum quamuis breuiter explicauerim et hoc illic non praetermiserim, et legere poterit, si non dedignetur, benignitas tua et a carissimis nostris. per quos haec scripta nunc misi, quo modo uolueris, tibi fides fiat illud me ante dictasse. mihique de animo meo crede. quod coram deo loquens iure caritatis exposco, numquam mihi uisum fuisse etiam nunc Christianos ex Iudaeis factos sacramenta illa uetera quolibet affectu, quolibet animo celebrare debere aut eis ullo modo licere, cum illud de Paulo semper ita senserim, ex quo illius mihi litterae innotuerunt, sicut nec tibi uidetur hoc tempore cuiquam ista esse simulanda, cum hoc fecisse apostolos credas.

### English translation (Claude)

I confess, indeed, that in what my letter contains, namely that Paul had undertaken to celebrate the sacraments of the Jews when he was already an apostle of Christ in order to teach that they were not harmful to those who wished to keep them as they had received them from their parents through the law, I did not add ‘only at that time when the grace of faith was first revealed’; for then this was not harmful. But in the course of time those observances were to be abandoned by all Christians, lest, if this had been done at that time, what God commanded his people through Moses should not be distinguished from what the unclean spirit instituted in the temples of demons. Therefore my negligence in not adding this is to be blamed rather than your rebuke. Yet long before I received your letter, when writing against Faustus the Manichaean, I explained the same passage, though briefly, and did not omit this point there; your Kindness can read it if you do not disdain to, and you may be assured, in whatever way you wish, by our dearest brothers through whom I have now sent these writings, that I dictated it earlier. And believe me about my own mind, which, speaking before God, I ask by the right of love: it has never seemed to me that even now Christians who have become so from among the Jews ought to celebrate those old sacraments with any feeling or in any spirit, or that it is in any way lawful for them, since I have always thought so about Paul from the time his letters became known to me; just as you do not think that anyone should pretend these things at this time, though you believe the apostles did so.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, C. Faust. 19.17 (Against Faustus the Manichaean): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes his own Ep. 40.4. The passage in the work against Faustus is Contra Faustum 19.17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.17 (CSEL 34.2:368–369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/80-1/#p-82-17).

## Letter 82.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:369–370
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine agrees with Jerome that the Jewish rites are now deadly, adding that pretended observance is equally so, and points out that Christ himself truly kept the law.

### Latin text

Proinde, sicut tu e contrario loqueris et licet reclamante, sicut scribis, mundo libera uoce pronuntias caeremonias Iudaeorum et perniciosas esse et mortiferas Christianis et, quicumque eas obseruauerit siue ex Iudaeis siue ex gentibus, eum in barathrum diaboli deuolutum, ita ego hanc uocem tuam omnino confirmo et addo: quicumque eas obseruauerit non solum ueraciter uerum etiam simulate, eum in barathrum diaboli deuolutum. quid quaeris amplius? sed sicut tu simulationem apostolorum ab huius temporis ratione secernis, ita ego Pauli apostoli ueracem tunc in his omnibus conuersationem ab huius temporis quamuis minime simulata caeremoniarum Iudaicarum obseruatione secerno, quoniam tunc fuit adprobanda nunc detestanda. ita quamuis legerimus: Lex et prophetae usque ad Iohannem Baptistam et quia propterea quaerebant Iudaei Christum interficere, quia non solum soluebat sabbatum, sed et patrem suum dicebat deum aequalem se faciens deo, et quia gratiam pro gratia accepimus et quoniam lex per Moysen data est, gratia autem et ueritas per Iesum Christum facta est et per Hieremiam promissum est daturum deum testamentum nouum domui Iuda non secundum testamentum, quod disposuit patribus eorum, non tamen arbitror ipsum dominum fallaciter a parentibus circumcisum aut, si hoc propter aetatem minime prohibebat, nec illud arbitror eum dixisse fallaciter leproso, quem certe non illa per Moysen praecepta obseruatio sed ipse mundauerat: Vade et offer pro te sacrificium, quod praecepit Moyses in testimonium illis; nec fallaciter ascendit ad diem festum usque adeo non causa ostentationis coram hominibus, ut non euidenter ascenderit sed latenter.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, just as you speak to the contrary and, though the world cries out against you, as you write, declare with a free voice that the ceremonies of the Jews are both harmful and deadly to Christians, and that whoever observes them, whether from the Jews or from the Gentiles, has fallen headlong into the devil’s pit, so I wholly confirm this saying of yours and add: whoever observes them, not only truthfully but even in pretence, has fallen headlong into the devil’s pit. What more do you want? But just as you distinguish the pretence of the apostles from the practice of this time, so I distinguish the truthful conduct of the apostle Paul in all these things at that time from any observance of the Jewish ceremonies at this time, even one wholly without pretence, since then it was to be approved and now it is to be detested. Thus, although we have read, ‘The law and the prophets were until John the Baptist,’ and that the Jews sought to kill Christ for this reason, ‘because he not only broke the sabbath but also called God his own Father, making himself equal with God,’ and that ‘we have received grace for grace,’ and that ‘the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ,’ and that it was promised through Jeremiah that God would give a new covenant to the house of Judah, not according to the covenant which he made with their fathers, yet I do not think that the Lord himself was deceitfully circumcised by his parents; or, if he did not prevent this because of his age, neither do I think that he spoke deceitfully to the leper, whom certainly not that observance commanded through Moses but he himself had cleansed: ‘Go and offer for yourself the sacrifice which Moses commanded, as a testimony to them’; nor that he went up to the feast deceitfully, so far from doing it for display before men that he went up not openly but secretly.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Jer 31:31 (38:31 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Luke 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:4: quotation, high confidence
- John 7:10: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine repeats the texts Jerome cited in Ep. 75.14: Luke 16:16; John 5:18; John 1:16–17; Jer 31:31–32. Allusions to Luke 2:21; quotation of Matt 8:4 (cf. Mark 1:44); allusion to John 7:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.18 (CSEL 34.2:369–370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-18).

## Letter 82.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:370–371
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Paul’s warning against circumcision in Galatians applies to those who thought it necessary for salvation, not to Timothy’s case.

### Latin text

At enim dixit idem apostolus: Ecce ego Paulus dico uobis, quia, si circumcidamini, Christus uobis nihil proderit. decepit ergo Timotheum et fecit ei nihil prodesse Christum. an quia hoc fallaciter factum est, ideo non offuit? at ipse hoc non posuit nec ait si circumcidamini ueraciter sicut nec fallaciter, sed sine ulla exceptione dixit: Si circumcidamini, Christus uobis nihil proderit. sicut ergo tu uis hic locum dare sententiae tuae, ut uelis subintellegi nisi fallaciter, ita non inpudenter flagito, ut etiam nos illic intellegere sinas eis dictum si circumcidamini, qui propterea uolebant circumcidi, quod aliter se putabant in Christo saluos esse non posse. hoc ergo animo, hac uoluntate, ista intentione quisquis tunc circumcidebatur, Christus ei omnino nihil proderat, sicut alibi aperte dicit: Nam si per legem iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est. hoc declarat et quod ipse commemorasti: Euacuati estis a Christo, qui in lege iustificamini; a gratia excidistis. illos itaque arguit, qui se iustificari in lege credebant, non qui legitima illa in eius honore, a quo mandata sunt, obseruabant intellegentes, et quia praenuntiandae ueritatis ratione mandata sint et quousque debeant perdurare. unde est illud, quod ait: Si spiritu ducimini, non adhuc estis sub lege, unde, uelut colligis, apparere, qui sub lege est, non dispensatiue, ut nostros putas uoluisse maiores, sed uere, ut ego intellego, eum sanctum spiritum non habere.

### English translation (Claude)

‘But the same apostle said, “Behold, I Paul say to you that if you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing.”’ Did he then deceive Timothy and make Christ profit him nothing? Or did it do him no harm because it was done deceitfully? But he did not put it that way, nor did he say ‘if you are circumcised truthfully’, any more than ‘deceitfully’; but he said without any exception, ‘If you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing.’ Just as, then, you wish to make room here for your opinion, so that you would have ‘unless deceitfully’ understood, so I ask, not shamelessly, that you allow us also to understand that ‘if you are circumcised’ was said there to those who wished to be circumcised because they thought they could not otherwise be saved in Christ. Whoever was then circumcised with this mind, this will, this intention, to him Christ profited nothing at all, as he says plainly elsewhere: ‘For if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died for nothing.’ This is also made clear by what you yourself quoted: ‘You are cut off from Christ, you who are justified by the law; you have fallen from grace.’ He rebukes, then, those who believed that they were justified in the law, not those who observed those legal rites in honour of him who commanded them, understanding both for what purpose they were commanded, namely to foretell the truth, and how long they ought to last. Hence his saying, ‘If you are led by the Spirit, you are no longer under the law’; from which, as you conclude, it appears that one who is under the law, not by arrangement, as you think our elders held, but truly, as I understand it, does not have the Holy Spirit.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:2: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 16:3: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:4: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations of Gal 5:2; Gal 2:21; Gal 5:4; Gal 5:18; allusion to Acts 16:3. Augustine answers Jerome, Ep. 75.14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.19 (CSEL 34.2:370–371; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-19).

## Letter 82.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:371–373
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that to be ‘under the law’ in Paul’s sense is to try to keep God’s commandments by one’s own strength without grace, and that the old rites could justify no one but were to be honourably laid aside.

### Latin text

Magna mihi uidetur quaestio, quid sit esse sub lege sic, quem ad modum apostolus culpat. neque enim hoc eum propter circumcisionem arbitror dicere aut illa sacrificia, quae tunc facta a patribus nunc a Christianis non fiunt, et cetera eius modi, sed hoc ipsum etiam, quod lex dicit: Non concupisces, quod fatemur certe Christianos obseruare debere atque euangelica maxime inlustratione praedicare. legem dicit esse sanctam et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum: deinde subiungit: Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? absit. sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem, ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum. quod autem hic dicit peccatum per mandatum fieri supra modum, hoc alibi: Lex subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum: ubi autem abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia; et alibi, cum superius de dispensatione gratiae loqueretur, quod ipsa iustificet, uelut interrogans ait: Quid ergo lex? atque huic interrogationi continuo respondit: Praeuaricationis gratia posita est, donec ueniret semen, cui promissum est. hos ergo damnabiliter dicit esse sub lege, quos reos facit lex non implentes legem, dum non intellegendo gratiae beneficium ad facienda dei praecepta quasi de suis uiribus superba elatione praesumunt. plenitudo enim legis caritas; caritas uero dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris non per nos ipsos sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. sed huic rei, quantum satis est, explicandae prolixus fortasse et sui proprii uoluminis sermo debetur. si ergo illud, quod lex ait: Non concupisces, si humana infirmitas gratia dei adiuta non fuerit, sub se reum tenet et praeuaricatorem potius damnat, quam liberat peccatorem, quanto magis illa, quae significationis causa praecepta sunt, circumcisio et cetera, quae gratiae reuelatione latius innotescente necesse fuerat aboleri, iustificare neminem poterant! non tamen ideo fuerant tamquam diabolica gentium sacrilegia fugienda, etiam cum ipsa gratia iam coeperit reuelari, quae umbris talibus fuerat praenuntiata, sed permittenda paululum eis maxime, qui ex illo populo, cui data sunt, uenerant. postea uero tamquam cum honore sepulta sint a Christianis omnibus inreparabiliter deserenda.

### English translation (Claude)

It seems to me a great question what it is to be under the law in the way the apostle censures. For I do not think he says this on account of circumcision, or those sacrifices which were then offered by the fathers and are not now offered by Christians, and other things of this kind, but also on account of this very thing which the law says, ‘You shall not covet,’ which we certainly confess Christians ought to observe and preach above all with the light of the gospel. He says that the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good; then he adds: ‘Did what is good, then, become death to me? By no means! But sin, that it might appear sin, worked death in me through what is good, so that sin through the commandment might become sinful beyond measure.’ What he says here, that sin through the commandment becomes sinful beyond measure, he says elsewhere: ‘The law came in that the offence might abound; but where the offence abounded, grace abounded all the more’; and elsewhere, after speaking above of the dispensation of grace, that it justifies, he asks as it were, ‘What then is the law?’ and at once answers this question: ‘It was added because of transgression, until the seed should come to whom the promise was made.’ Those, then, he says are under the law to their condemnation whom the law makes guilty because they do not fulfil the law, while, not understanding the benefit of grace, they presume in proud self-exaltation to do the commandments of God as if by their own strength. For love is the fulfilling of the law; and the love of God has been poured out in our hearts, not by ourselves, but by the Holy Spirit who has been given to us. But to explain this matter sufficiently, a long discourse, perhaps one needing a volume of its own, is required. If, then, what the law says, ‘You shall not covet,’ holds man guilty under it if human weakness is not helped by the grace of God, and rather condemns the transgressor than frees the sinner, how much less could those things which were commanded for the sake of signification, circumcision and the rest, which had to be abolished as the revelation of grace became more widely known, justify anyone! Yet they were not on that account to be shunned like the diabolical sacrileges of the Gentiles, even when the grace itself which such shadows had foretold had begun to be revealed, but were to be permitted for a little while, especially to those who had come from the people to whom they were given; but afterwards, as if buried with honour, they were to be abandoned irrevocably by all Christians.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Grace and the law; doctrinally significant, translated as written. Quotations: Exod 20:17 / Rom 7:7; Rom 7:12–13; Rom 5:20; Gal 3:19; Rom 13:10; Rom 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.20 (CSEL 34.2:371–373; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-20).

## Letter 82.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:373–374
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Jerome’s ‘arrangement’ (dispensatio) is simply a dutiful lie under another name.

### Latin text

Hoc autem, quod dicis non dispensatiue, ut nostri uoluere maiores. quid sibi uult? oro te. aut enim hoc est, quod ego appello officiosum mendacium, ut haec dispensatio sit officium uelut honeste mentiendi, aut, quid aliud sit, omnino non uideo, nisi forte addito nomine dispensationis fit, ut mendacium non sit mendacium. quod si absurdum est, cur ergo non aperte dicis officiosum mendacium defendendum? nisi forte nomen te mouet, quia non tam usitatum est in ecclesiasticis libris uocabulum officii, quod Ambrosius noster non timuit, qui suos quosdam libros utilium praeceptionum plenos de officiis uoluit appellare. an, si officiose mentiatur quisque, culpandus est, si dispensatiue, adprobandus? rogo te. mentiatur, ubi legerit, qui hoc putat — quia et haec magna quaestio est, sitne aliquando mentiri uiri boni, immo uiri Christiani, qualibus dictum est: Sit in ore uestro est est non non et qui cum fide audiunt: Perdes omnes.

### English translation (Claude)

But what, I pray you, is the meaning of your phrase, ‘not by arrangement, as our elders held’? Either this is what I call a dutiful lie, so that this ‘arrangement’ is a duty, as it were, of lying honourably; or I cannot see at all what else it is, unless perhaps by adding the name ‘arrangement’ it comes about that a lie is not a lie. If that is absurd, why then do you not say openly that the dutiful lie is to be defended? Unless perhaps the name troubles you, because the word ‘duty’ is not so commonly used in church writings; but our Ambrose did not fear it, who chose to call certain books of his, full of useful precepts, ‘On Duties’. Or is a man to be blamed if he lies dutifully, but approved if he lies by arrangement? I ask you: let him who thinks this lie where he chooses (for this too is a great question, whether it is ever right for a good man, nay, for a Christian man, to lie, to men to whom it was said, ‘Let your speech be yes, yes; no, no,’ and who hear with faith, ‘You will destroy all

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:37: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 5:6 (5:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The sentence continues in 82.22. Ambrose’s De officiis. Quotation of Matt 5:37 and (continuing) Ps 5:6 (LXX 5:7).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.21 (CSEL 34.2:373–374; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-21).

## Letter 82.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:374–375
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine insists that the authors of canonical Scripture never lie, and praises Paul’s just freedom and Peter’s humility in accepting correction as the better answer to Porphyry.

### Latin text

qui loquuntur mendacium; sed, ut dixi, et alia et magna quaestio est — eligat, quod uoluerit, qui hoc existimat, ubi mentiatur, dum tamen ab scribentibus auctoribus sanctarum scripturarum et maxime canonicarum inconcusse credatur et defendatur abesse omnino mendacium, ne dispensatores Christi, de quibus dictum est: Hic iam quaeritur inter dispensatores, ut fidelis quis inueniatur, tamquam magnum aliquid sibi fideliter didicisse uideantur pro ueritatis dispensatione mentiri, cum ipsa fides in Latino sermone ab eo dicatur appellata, quia fit, quod dicitur. ubi autem fit. quod dicitur, mentiendi utique non est locus. fidelis igitur dispensator apostolus Paulus procul dubio nobis exhibet in scribendo fidem, quia ueritatis dispensator erat, non falsitatis. ac per hoc uerum scripsit uidisse se Petrum non recte ingredientem ad ueritatem euangelii eique in faciem restitisse, quod gentes cogeret iudaizare. ipse uero Petrus, quod a Paulo fiebat utiliter libertate caritatis, sanctae ac benignae pietate humilitatis accepit atque ita rarius et sanctius exemplum posteris praebuit, quo non dedignarentur, sicubi forte recti tramitem reliquissent, etiam a posterioribus corrigi, quam Paulus. quo fidenter auderent etiam minores maioribus pro defendenda euangelica ueritate salua fraterna caritate resistere. nam cum satius sit a tenendo itinere in nullo quam in aliquo declinare. multo est tamen mirabilius et laudabilius libenter accipere corrigentem quam audacter corrigere deuiantem. laus itaque iustae libertatis in Paulo et sanctae humilitatis in Petro, quantum mihi pro modulo meo uidetur, magis fuerat aduersus calumniantem Porphyrium defendenda, quam ut ei daretur obtrectandi maior occasio, qua multo mordacius criminaretur Christianos fallaciter uel suas litteras scribere uel dei sui sacramenta portare.

### English translation (Claude)

who speak a lie’; but, as I said, that is another and a great question): let him who thinks so choose where he will lie, provided only that it is believed and defended without wavering that a lie is altogether absent from the writing authors of the holy Scriptures, and especially of the canonical Scriptures; lest the stewards of Christ, of whom it is said, ‘Here it is required among stewards that one be found faithful,’ should seem to have learned, as some great thing to be faithful in, to lie for the sake of the stewardship of the truth; when in the Latin language fides itself is said to be so called because what is said is done (fit quod dicitur). But where what is said is done, there is certainly no room for lying. The apostle Paul, then, a faithful steward, beyond doubt shows us good faith in his writing, because he was a steward of truth, not of falsehood. And therefore he wrote the truth when he said he had seen Peter not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel and had withstood him to his face, because he was compelling the Gentiles to live as Jews. And Peter himself received what Paul did usefully with the freedom of love, with the holy and kind devotion of humility, and so gave posterity an example rarer and holier than Paul’s: that they should not disdain, if they had perhaps left the straight path anywhere, to be corrected even by their juniors; whereas Paul’s example was that even lesser men might boldly dare to resist greater ones in defence of the truth of the gospel, while keeping brotherly love. For while it is better not to turn aside from the road at all than to turn aside in anything, it is much more wonderful and praiseworthy to accept a corrector gladly than boldly to correct one who strays. So the praise of just freedom in Paul and of holy humility in Peter ought, as far as it seems to me in my small measure, rather to have been defended against the slanderer Porphyry, than that he should be given a greater occasion for disparagement, by which he could accuse Christians much more bitingly of either writing their letters deceitfully or carrying out the sacraments of their God deceitfully.

### Scripture references

- Ps 5:6 (5:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:2: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Porphyry, Porphyry, Chr. (Porphyry, Against the Christians (fragments)): allusion, medium confidence
- Cicero, Off. 1.23 (Cicero): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Continues the sentence begun in 82.21 (Ps 5:6). Quotation of 1 Cor 4:2. The derivation of fides from fit quod dicitur is Cicero’s (De officiis 1.23).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.22 (CSEL 34.2:374–375; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-22).

## Letter 82.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:375–376
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that Jerome himself discredits four of the six or seven authorities he cites, leaving only Eusebius of Emesa, Theodore of Heraclea, and John Chrysostom.

### Latin text

Flagitas a me, ut aliquem saltem unum ostendam, cuius in hac re sententiam sim secutus, cum tu tam plures nominatim commemoraueris, qui te in eo, quod adstruis, praecesserunt, petens, ut in eo si te reprehendo errantem, patiar te errare cum talibus, quorum ego, fateor, neminem legi. sed cum sint ferme sex uel septem, horum quattuor auctoritatem tu quoque infringis. nam Laodicenum, cuius nomen taces, de ecclesia dicis nuper egressum, Alexandrum autem ueterem haereticum, Origenem uero ac Didymum reprehensos abs te lego in recentioribus opusculis tuis et non mediocriter nec de mediocribus quaestionibus, quamuis Origenem mirabiliter ante laudaueris. cum his ergo errare puto quia nec te ipse patieris, quamuis hoc perinde dicatur, ac si in hac sententia non errauerint. nam quis est, qui se uelit cum quolibet errare? tres igitur restant, Eusebius Emisenus, Theodorus Heracleotes et, quem paulo post commemoras, Iohannes, qui dudum in pontificali gradu Constantinopolitanam rexit ecclesiam.

### English translation (Claude)

You demand that I show at least one person whose opinion I have followed in this matter, since you have named so many who went before you in what you maintain, asking that, if I rebuke you as in error in this, I should allow you to err with such men; of whom, I confess, I have read none. But though there are some six or seven of them, you yourself weaken the authority of four. For the Laodicean, whose name you do not mention, you say has lately left the church; Alexander you call a heretic of old; and Origen and Didymus I read are criticized by you in your more recent works, and not mildly nor on minor questions, although you formerly praised Origen wonderfully. To err with these, then, I think you will not allow even yourself, although this is said as if they had not erred in this opinion. For who is there who would wish to err with just anyone? There remain, then, three: Eusebius of Emesa, Theodore of Heraclea, and, whom you mention a little later, John, who not long ago governed the church of Constantinople in the episcopal rank.

### Translation notes

- Answering Jerome, Ep. 75.4, 6. ‘I think you will not allow even yourself’: the printed construction (puto quia) is awkward; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.23 (CSEL 34.2:375–376; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-23).

## Letter 82.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:376–377
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine names Ambrose and Cyprian on his side but appeals above all to Paul’s own oath in Galatians that he does not lie.

### Latin text

Porro si quaeras uel recolas, quid hinc senserit noster Ambrosius, quid noster itidem Cyprianus, inuenies fortasse nec nobis defuisse, quos in eo, quod adserimus, sequeremur. quamquam, sicut paulo ante dixi, tantum modo scripturis canonicis hanc ingenuam debeam seruitutem, qua eas solas ita sequar, ut conscriptores earum nihil in eis omnino errasse, nihil fallaciter posuisse non dubitem. proinde cum quaero tertium, ut tres etiam ego tribus opponam, possem quidem, ut arbitror, facile reperire, si multa legissem. uerum tamen ipse mihi pro his omnibus, immo supra hos omnes apostolus Paulus occurrit. ad ipsum confugio, ad ipsum ab omnibus, qui aliud sentiunt, litterarum eius tractatoribus prouoco, ipsum interrogans interpello et requiro in eo, quod scripsit ad Galatas uidisse se Petrum non recte ingredientem ad ueritatem euangelii eique in faciem propterea restitisse, quod illa simulatione gentes iudaizare cogebat, utrum uerum scripserit, an forte nescio qua dispensatiua falsitate mentitus sit. et audio paulo superius in eiusdem narrationis exordio religiosa uoce mihi clamantem: Quae autem scribo uobis, ecce coram deo, quia non mentior.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, if you inquire or recall what our Ambrose thought on this, and likewise our Cyprian, you will perhaps find that we too have not lacked men to follow in what we assert. Although, as I said a little before, I owe this willing servitude only to the canonical Scriptures, by which I follow them alone in such a way that I do not doubt that their writers erred in nothing at all in them and set down nothing deceitfully. So when I look for a third, so that I too may set three against three, I could, I think, easily find one if I had read much. But the apostle Paul himself comes to my aid in place of all these, nay, above all these. To him I flee; to him I appeal from all the commentators on his letters who think otherwise; him I question and challenge and ask, about what he wrote to the Galatians, that he saw Peter not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel and withstood him to his face because by that pretence he was compelling the Gentiles to live as Jews: did he write the truth, or did he perhaps lie with some falsehood of arrangement? And I hear him, a little earlier, at the beginning of the same narrative, crying out to me with a solemn voice: ‘Now in what I write to you, behold, before God, I do not lie.’

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Gal 1:20; allusion to Gal 2:11–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.24 (CSEL 34.2:376–377; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-24).

## Letter 82.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:377–378
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine trusts Paul’s sworn word and denies that Paul either pretended to the Jews’ error or shared it.

### Latin text

Dent ueniam quilibet aliud opinantes; ego magis credo tanto apostolo in suis et pro suis litteris iuranti quam cuique doctissimo de alienis litteris disputanti. nec dici timeo sic Paulum defendere, quod non simularit errorem Iudaeorum, sed uere fuerit in errore, quoniam neque simulabat errorem, qui libertate apostolica, sicut illi tempori congruebat, uetera illa sacramenta, ubi opus erat, agendo commendabat ea non satanae uersutia decipiendis hominibus sed dei prouidentia praenuntiandis rebus futuris prophetice constituta, nec uere fuerat in errore Iudaeorum, qui non solum nouerat, sed etiam instanter et acriter praedicabat eos errare, qui putabant gentibus inponenda uel iustificationi quorumque fidelium necessaria.

### English translation (Claude)

Let those who think otherwise pardon me; I would rather believe so great an apostle swearing in and for his own letters than any most learned man discussing the letters of another. Nor do I fear being said to defend Paul by claiming that he did not pretend to the error of the Jews but was truly in error. For he was not pretending to an error, who, with apostolic freedom, as suited that time, commended those old sacraments by practising them where there was need, as instituted not by the cunning of Satan to deceive men but by the providence of God to foretell things to come prophetically; nor was he truly in the error of the Jews, who not only knew but also insistently and sharply preached that those were in error who thought that these things should be imposed on the Gentiles or were necessary for the justification of any of the faithful.

### Translation notes

- Answering Jerome, Ep. 75.17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.25 (CSEL 34.2:377–378; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-25).

## Letter 82.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:378
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine clarifies that Paul acted truthfully, not in pretence, both when he conformed to Jewish custom and when he freed Gentiles from food laws.

### Latin text

Quod autem dixi eum factum Iudaeis tamquam Iudaeum et tamquam gentilem gentilibus non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu, quem ad modum dixerim, parum mihi uisus es adtendisse, immo ego fortasse non satis hoc explanare potuerim. neque enim hoc ideo dixi, quod misericorditer illa simulauerit, sed quia sic ea non simulauit, quae faciebat similia Iudaeis, quem ad modum nec illa, quae faciebat similia gentibus, quae tu quoque commemorasti atque in eo me, quod non ingrate fateor, adiuuisti. cum enim abs te quaesissem in epistula mea, quo modo putetur ideo factus Iudaeis tamquam Iudaeus, quia fallaciter suscepit sacramenta Iudaeorum, cum et gentibus tamquam gentilis factus sit nec tamen susceperit fallaciter sacrificia gentium, tu respondisti in eo factum gentibus tamquam gentilem, quod praeputium receperit, quod indifferenter permiserit uesci cibis, quos damnant Iudaei. ubi ego quaero, utrum et hoc simulate fecerit, quod si absurdissimum atque falsissimum est, sic ergo et illa, in quibus Iudaeorum consuetudini congruebat, libertate prudenti, non necessitate seruili aut, quod est indignius, dispensatione fallaci potius quam fideli.

### English translation (Claude)

As for my saying that he became as a Jew to the Jews and as a Gentile to the Gentiles, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion’, you seem to me to have paid too little attention to how I said it; or perhaps I was not able to explain it well enough. For I did not say this because he pretended those things out of mercy, but because he did not pretend the things in which he acted like the Jews, just as he did not pretend those in which he acted like the Gentiles, which you too mentioned, and in that, I confess not ungratefully, you helped me. For when I had asked you in my letter how he can be thought to have become as a Jew to the Jews because he deceitfully took up the sacraments of the Jews, since he also became as a Gentile to the Gentiles and yet did not deceitfully take up the sacrifices of the Gentiles, you answered that he became as a Gentile to the Gentiles in this, that he received the uncircumcised and permitted them without distinction to eat foods which the Jews condemn. Here I ask whether he did this too in pretence. If that is most absurd and most false, then so too he did those things in which he conformed to the custom of the Jews with prudent freedom, not by servile necessity, or, what is more unworthy, by a deceitful rather than a faithful arrangement.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:20: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 1 Cor 9:20–21; Augustine refers to Jerome’s reply in Ep. 75.17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.26 (CSEL 34.2:378; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-26).

## Letter 82.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:378–379
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Paul could not have been truthful with Gentiles and deceitful with Jews, since he owed both love with a pure heart and unfeigned faith.

### Latin text

Fidelibus enim et his, qui cognouerunt ueritatem, sicut ipse testatur, nisi forte et hic fallit, omnis creatura dei bona est et nihil abiciendum, quod cum gratiarum actione accipitur. ergo et ipsi Paulo, non solum uiro uerum etiam dispensatori maxime fideli, non solum cognitori uerum etiam doctori ueritatis, omnis utique in cibis creatura dei non simulate sed uere bona erat. cur igitur nihil simulate suscipiendo sacrorum caeremoniarumque gentilium sed de cibis et praeputio uerum sentiendo ac docendo tamen tamquam gentilis factus est gentibus et non potuit fieri tamquam Iudaeus Iudaeis nisi fallaciter suscipiendo sacramenta Iudaeorum? cur oleastro inserto seruauit dispensationis ueracem fidem et naturalibus ramis non extra sed in arbore constitutis nescio quod dispensatoriae simulationis uelamen obtendit? cur factus tamquam gentilis gentibus, quod sentit, docet, quod agit, sentit; factus autem tamquam Iudaeus Iudaeis aliud claudit in pectore, aliud promit in uerbis, in factis, in scriptis? sed absit hoc sapere. utrisque enim debebat caritatem de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta. ac per hoc omnibus omnia factus est, ut omnes lucrifaceret non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu, id est non omnia mala hominum fallaciter agendo sed aliorum omnium malis omnibus, tamquam si sua essent, misericordia medicinae diligentiam procurando.

### English translation (Claude)

For to the faithful and to those who have known the truth, as he himself testifies (unless perhaps he deceives here too), every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving. Therefore to Paul himself, not only a man but a most faithful steward, not only a knower but a teacher of the truth, every creature of God among foods was certainly good, not in pretence but truly. Why, then, did he become as a Gentile to the Gentiles without taking up in pretence any of the Gentile rites and ceremonies, but by truly thinking and teaching about foods and uncircumcision, and yet could not become as a Jew to the Jews except by deceitfully taking up the sacraments of the Jews? Why did he keep the truthful faith of his stewardship toward the grafted wild olive, and yet hold out some veil or other of pretended arrangement before the natural branches, which are not outside but in the tree? Why, having become as a Gentile to the Gentiles, does he teach what he thinks and think what he does, while having become as a Jew to the Jews he shuts up one thing in his heart and brings out another in words, deeds, and writings? Far be it from us to think so. For he owed to both love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned. And so he became all things to all men that he might gain all, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion’, that is, not by deceitfully doing all the evils of men, but by attending, with the diligence of merciful healing, to all the evils of all others as if they were his own.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Tim 4:3–4; Rom 11:17–24; 1 Tim 1:5; 1 Cor 9:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.27 (CSEL 34.2:378–379; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-27).

## Letter 82.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:379–380
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul’s becoming ‘as a Jew’ meant seeking to free the Jews from error as if it were his own, out of love of neighbour.

### Latin text

Cum itaque illa testamenti ueteris sacramenta etiam sibi agenda minime recusabat, non misericorditer fallebat, sed omnino non fallens atque hoc modo a domino deo illa usque ad certi temporis dispensationem iussa esse commendans a sacrilegis sacris gentium distinguebat. tunc autem non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu Iudaeis tamquam Iudaeus fiebat, quando eos ab illo errore, quo uel in Christum credere nolebant uel per uetera sacerdotia sua caeremoniarumque obseruationes se a peccatis posse mundari fierique saluos existimabant, sic liberare cupiebat, tamquam ipse illo errore teneretur, diligens utique proximum tamquam se ipsum et haec aliis faciens, quae sibi ab aliis fieri uellet, si hoc illi opus esset. quod cum dominus monuisset, adiunxit: Haec est enim lex et prophetae.

### English translation (Claude)

So when he did not refuse to practise those sacraments of the old covenant himself, he was not deceiving out of mercy, but, not deceiving at all, he was in this way commending them as commanded by the Lord God for the arrangement of a fixed time, and distinguishing them from the sacrilegious rites of the Gentiles. But he became as a Jew to the Jews, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion’, when he desired to free them from that error by which they either refused to believe in Christ or thought that they could be cleansed from sins and saved by their old priesthoods and the observances of their ceremonies, as if he himself were held by that error, loving his neighbour as himself and doing to others what he would wish others to do to him if he needed it. When the Lord had given this counsel, he added, ‘For this is the law and the prophets.’

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:39: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 22:39; quotation of Matt 7:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.28 (CSEL 34.2:379–380; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-28).

## Letter 82.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:380–381
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine illustrates compassionate identification from Galatians 6:1: Paul became all things to all by sympathy, not pretence.

### Latin text

Hunc compatientis affectum in eadem epistula ad Galatas praecipit dicens: Si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, uos, qui spiritales estis, instruite huius modi in spiritu lenitatis intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tempteris. uide, si non dixit fieri tamquam ille, ut illum lucrifacias, non utique ut ipsum delictum fallaciter ageret aut se id habere simularet, sed ut in alterius delicto, quid etiam sibi accidere posset, adtenderet atque ita alteri, tamquam sibi ab altero uellet, misericorditer subueniret, hoc est non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu. sic Iudaeo, sic gentili, sic cuilibet homini Paulus in errore uel peccato aliquo constituto non simulando, quod non erat, sed compatiendo. quia esse potuisset, tamquam qui se hominem cogitaret, omnibus omnia factus est, ut omnes lucrifaceret.

### English translation (Claude)

This affection of compassion he commands in the same Letter to the Galatians, saying: ‘If a man is overtaken in any fault, you who are spiritual instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself, lest you too be tempted.’ See whether he did not say to become as that man in order to gain him: not, of course, that one should deceitfully commit the fault itself or pretend to have it, but that in another’s fault one should consider what could happen to oneself too, and so help the other mercifully, as one would wish to be helped by another; that is, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion.’ So to the Jew, so to the Gentile, so to any man set in some error or sin, Paul became all things to all men, that he might gain all, not by pretending to be what he was not, but by having compassion, because he could have been such, as one who considered that he was a man.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Gal 6:1; allusion to 1 Cor 9:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.29 (CSEL 34.2:380–381; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-29).

## Letter 82.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:381–382
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Jerome’s own profession of sincere friendship and says that Paul showed the same sincerity in his letters.

### Latin text

Te ipsum, si placet, obsecro te, paulisper intuere, te ipsum, inquam, erga me ipsum et recole uel, si habes conscripta, relege uerba tua in illa epistula, quam mihi per fratrem nostrum iam collegam meum Cyprianum breuiorem misisti, quam ueraci, quam germano, quam pleno caritatis affectu, cum quaedam me in te commisisse expostulasses, grauiter subiunxisti: In hoc laeditur amicitia, in hoc necessitudinis iura uiolantur; ne uideamur certare pueriliter et fautoribus inuicem uel detractoribus nostris tribuere materiam contendendi. haec abs te uerba non solum ex animo dicta sentio uerum etiam benigno animo ad consulendum mihi. denique addis, quod, etiam si non adderes, appareret, et dicis: Haec scribo, quia te pure et Christiane diligere cupio nec quicquam in mea mente retinere, quod distet a labiis. o uir sancte mihique, ut deus uidet animam meam, ueraci corde dilecte, hoc ipsum, quod posuisti in litteris tuis, quod te mihi exhibuisse non dubito, hoc ipsum omnino Paulum apostolum credo exhibuisse in litteris suis non uni cuilibet homini sed Iudaeis et Graecis et omnibus gentibus filiis suis, quos in euangelio genuerat et quos pariendos parturiebat, et deinde posterorum tot milibus fidelium Christianorum, propter quos illa memoriae mandabatur epistula, ut nihil in sua mente retineret, quod distaret a labiis.

### English translation (Claude)

Look at yourself for a moment, I beseech you, if you please; at yourself, I say, in relation to me; and recall, or, if you have it in writing, reread the words of that shorter letter which you sent me by our brother, now my colleague, Cyprian, how truthfully, how brotherly, how full of loving affection, after you had complained that I had committed certain offences against you, you added gravely: ‘In this friendship is injured, in this the rights of close relationship are violated; let us not seem to contend like boys and give our supporters or detractors matter for dispute.’ These words of yours I feel were spoken not only from the heart but also with a kindly heart, to counsel me. Finally you add what would be evident even if you did not add it, and you say: ‘I write this because I wish to love you purely and in a Christian way, and not to keep anything in my mind that differs from my lips.’ O holy man, beloved by me, as God sees my soul, with a truthful heart: this very thing which you put in your letter, and which I do not doubt you have shown to me, this very thing I believe the apostle Paul showed in his letters, not to some one man but to Jews and Greeks and all nations, his sons, whom he had begotten in the gospel and was in labour to bring to birth, and then to so many thousands of faithful Christians of later generations, for whose sake that letter was committed to memory: that he kept nothing in his mind that differed from his lips.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:15: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Jerome’s Ep. 72. Allusions to 1 Cor 4:15; Gal 4:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.30 (CSEL 34.2:381–382; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-30).

## Letter 82.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:382
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Jerome for correcting him and asks that his own frank criticism be taken in the same spirit, since true friends wound faithfully.

### Latin text

Certe factus es etiam tu tamquam ego non mentientis astu sed compatientis affectu, cum cogitares tam me non relinquendum in ea culpa, in quam me prolapsum existimasti, quam nec te uelles, si eo modo prolapsus esses. unde agens gratias beniuolae menti erga me tuae simul posco, ut etiam mihi non suscenseas, quod, cum in opusculis tuis aliqua me mouerent, motum meum intimaui tibi hoc erga me ab omnibus seruari uolens, quod erga te ipse seruaui, ut, quicquid inprobandum putant in scriptis meis, nec claudant subdolo pectore nec ita reprehendant apud alios, ut taceant apud me, hinc potius existimans laedi amicitiam et necessitudinis iura uiolari. nescio enim, utrum Christianae amicitiae putandae sint, in quibus magis ualet uulgare prouerbium: Obsequium amicos, ueritas odium parit, quam ecclesiasticum: Fideliora sunt uulnera amici quam uoluntaria oscula inimici.

### English translation (Claude)

Certainly you too became as I am, ‘not with the cunning of a liar but with the affection of one who has compassion’, when you considered that I should no more be left in the fault into which you thought I had fallen than you would wish to be left if you had fallen in that way. So, thanking you for your kind mind toward me, I ask at the same time that you also not be angry with me because, when some things in your works troubled me, I made my concern known to you, wishing all to observe toward me what I myself observed toward you: that whatever they think deserves disapproval in my writings they should neither shut up in a deceitful heart nor criticize before others while keeping silent before me; thinking rather that it is by this that friendship is injured and the rights of close relationship are violated. For I do not know whether those friendships are to be thought Christian in which the common proverb, ‘Compliance breeds friends, truth breeds hatred,’ has more force than the church’s proverb, ‘Faithful are the wounds of a friend, rather than the willing kisses of an enemy.’

### Scripture references

- Prov 27:6: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Andr. 68 (Terence): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The common proverb is from Terence, Andria 68. Quotation of Prov 27:6 (Old Latin form).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.31 (CSEL 34.2:382; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-31).

## Letter 82.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:382–384
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks that their friends learn that friends can disagree in love, and assures Jerome that his earlier letter circulated without his intent.

### Latin text

Proinde carissimos nostros, qui nostris laboribus sincerissime fauent, hoc potius, quanta possumus instantia, doceamus, quo sciant fieri posse, ut inter carissimos aliquid alterutro sermone contra dicatur nec tamen caritas ipsa minuatur nec ueritas odium pariat, quae debetur amicitiae, siue illud uerum sit, quod contra dicitur, siue corde ueraci, qualecumque sit, dicitur non retinendo in mente, quod distet a labiis. credant itaque fratres nostri, familiares tui, quibus testimonium perhibes, quod sint uasa Christi, me inuito factum nec mediocrem de hac re dolorem inesse cordi meo, quod litterae meae prius in multorum manus uenerunt, quam ad te, ad quem scriptae sunt, peruenire potuerunt. quo autem modo id acciderit, et longum est narrare et, nisi fallor, superfluum, cum sufficiat, si quid mihi in hoc creditur, non eo factum animo, quo putatur, nec omnino meae fuisse uoluntatis aut dispositionis aut consensionis aut saltem cogitationis, ut fieret. haec si non credunt, quod teste deo loquor, quid amplius faciam, non habeo. ego tamen absit, ut eos credam haec tuae sanctitati maliuola mente suggerere ad excitandas inter nos inimicitias, quas misericordia domini dei nostri auertat a nobis, sed sine ullo nocendi animo facile de homine humana uitia suspicari. hoc enim me de illis aequum est credere, si uasa sunt Christi non in contumeliam sed in honorem facta et disposita in domo magna a deo in opus bonum. quod si post hanc adtestationem meam, si in notitiam eorum uenerit, facere uoluerint, quam non recte faciant, et tu uides.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly let us rather teach our dearest friends, who most sincerely favour our labours, with all the urgency we can, so that they may know that it is possible for one dear friend to contradict another in conversation without love itself being diminished and without truth, which is owed to friendship, breeding hatred, whether what is said in contradiction is true or, whatever it is, is said with a truthful heart, keeping nothing in the mind that differs from the lips. Let our brothers, then, your intimates, to whom you bear witness that they are vessels of Christ, believe that it happened against my will, and that there is no small grief in my heart over this, that my letter came into many hands before it could reach you, to whom it was written. How this happened would be long to tell and, if I am not mistaken, superfluous, since it is enough, if I am believed in this, that it was not done with the intent that is supposed, nor was it at all of my will or arrangement or consent or even thought that it should happen. If they do not believe this, which I say with God as witness, I have nothing more I can do. Yet far be it from me to believe that they suggest these things to your Holiness with malicious intent, to stir up enmity between us, which may the mercy of the Lord our God turn away from us; rather, that without any intention of harm they easily suspect human failings in a man. For it is right for me to believe this of them, if they are vessels of Christ made not for dishonour but for honour, and set by God in a great house for good work. But if, after this testimony of mine, should it come to their notice, they wish to do so, you too see how wrongly they act.

### Scripture references

- Acts 9:15: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Tim 2:20: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Acts 9:15 and 2 Tim 2:20–21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.32 (CSEL 34.2:382–384; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-32).

## Letter 82.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-33
- Source: CSEL 34.2:384–385
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains his earlier remarks, including the reference to Stesichorus, asks Jerome’s forgiveness, and invites his correction, acknowledging that in many things he is Jerome’s inferior.

### Latin text

Quod sane scripseram nullum me librum aduersus te Romam misisse, ideo scripseram, quia et libri nomen ab illa epistula discernebam, unde omnino nescio quid aliud te audisse existimaueram, et Romam nec ipsam epistulam sed tibi miseram et aduersus te non esse arbitrabar, quod sinceritate amicitiae siue ad admonendum siue ad te uel me abs te corrigendum fecisse me noueram. exceptis autem familiaribus tuis te ipsum obsecro per gratiam, qua redempti sumus, ut, quaecumque tua bona, quae tibi domini bonitate concessa sunt, in litteris meis posui, non me existimes insidioso blandiloquio posuisse, si quid autem in te peccaui, dimittas mihi. nec illud, quod de nescio cuius poetae fato ineptius fortasse quam litteratius a me commemoratum est, amplius, quam dixi, ad te trahas, cum continuo subiecerim non hoc ideo me dixisse, ut oculos cordis reciperes, quos absit inquam, ut amiseris, sed ut aduerteres, quos sanos ac uigiles haberes. propter solam ergo παλινῳδίαν, si aliquid scripserimus, quod scripto posteriore destruere debeamus, imitandam, non propter Stesichori caecitatem, quam cordi tuo nec tribui nec timui, adtingendum illud existimaui. atque identidem rogo, ut me fidenter corrigas, ubi mihi hoc opus esse perspexeris. quamquam enim secundum honorum uocabula, quae iam ecclesiae usus obtinuit, episcopatus presbyterio maior sit, tamen in multis rebus Augustinus Hieronymo minor est, licet etiam a minore quolibet non sit refugienda uel dedignanda correctio.

### English translation (Claude)

As for my having written that I had sent no book against you to Rome, I wrote it because I distinguished the name ‘book’ from that letter, so that I supposed you had heard of something else altogether; and because I had sent not even that letter to Rome but to you; and I did not think it was against you, since I knew I had written it in sincere friendship, either to admonish you or to correct you or be corrected by you. And, setting aside your intimates, I beseech you yourself, by the grace by which we were redeemed, not to think that I set down with insidious flattery whatever good qualities of yours, granted you by the Lord’s goodness, I mentioned in my letter; and, if I have sinned against you in anything, to forgive me. Nor should you draw to yourself more than I said in my mention, perhaps more foolish than learned, of the fate of some poet or other, since I at once added that I did not say it so that you might recover the eyes of your heart (‘which far be it,’ I said, ‘that you have lost’), but so that you might turn them, sound and watchful as they are, to the matter. I thought fit to touch on it, then, only for the sake of the palinode, which we should imitate if we have written anything that we ought to undo by a later writing, not for the sake of the blindness of Stesichorus, which I neither attributed to nor feared for your heart. And again and again I ask you to correct me confidently wherever you see I need it. For although, according to the titles of honour which the usage of the church has now established, the episcopate is greater than the presbyterate, yet in many things Augustine is less than Jerome; although correction is not to be shunned or disdained even from anyone who is less.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Stesichorus (Stesichorus): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Stesichorus recanted his slander of Helen in a ‘palinode’ (recantation) and recovered his sight; Augustine had used the story in Ep. 40.7. The remark on bishop and presbyter reflects church usage of the time; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.33 (CSEL 34.2:384–385; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-33).

## Letter 82.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-34
- Source: CSEL 34.2:385–386
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome which Jews he meant had corrupted the text, and requests his translation from the Septuagint and his book on translation.

### Latin text

De interpretatione tua iam mihi persuasisti, qua utilitate scripturas uolueris transferre de Hebraeis, ut scilicet ea, quae a Iudaeis praetermissa uel corrupta sunt, proferres in medium. sed peto insinuare digneris, a quibus Iudaeis, utrum ab eis ipsis, qui ante aduentum domini interpretati sunt, et, si ita est, quibus uel quonam eorum, an ab istis posterius, qui propterea putari possunt aliqua de codicibus Graecis uel subtraxisse uel in eis corrupisse, ne illis testimoniis de Christiana fide conuincerentur. illi autem anteriores cur hoc facere uoluerint, non inuenio. deinde nobis mittas, obsecro, interpretationem tuam de septuaginta, quam te edidisse nesciebam. librum quoque tuum, cuius mentionem fecisti, de optimo genere interpretandi cupio legere et adhuc nosse, quo modo coaequanda sit in interprete peritia linguarum coniecturis eorum, qui scripturas disserendo pertractant, quos necesse est, etiam si rectae atque unius fidei fuerint, uarias parere in multorum locorum obscuritate sententias, quamuis nequaquam ipsa uarietas ab eiusdem fidei unitate discordet, sicut etiam unus tractator secundum eandem fidem aliter atque aliter eundem locum potest exponere, quia hoc eius obscuritas patitur.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your translation, you have now persuaded me of the usefulness for which you wished to translate the Scriptures from the Hebrew, namely to bring into the open what was omitted or corrupted by the Jews. But I ask you to deign to tell me by which Jews: whether by those who translated before the coming of the Lord, and if so, by which of them, or by those later ones, who may be thought to have removed or corrupted some things in the Greek manuscripts so as not to be refuted by those testimonies of the Christian faith. But why the earlier ones should have wished to do this I cannot find. Next, send me, I beg you, your translation from the Seventy, which I did not know you had published. I also want to read your book, which you mentioned, ‘On the Best Kind of Translation’, and to learn further how in a translator the knowledge of languages is to be balanced with the conjectures of those who treat the Scriptures in commentary; who must necessarily, even if they are of the right and one faith, produce various opinions in the obscurity of many passages, though this variety in no way departs from the unity of the same faith; just as one commentator, too, can expound the same passage in different ways according to the same faith, because its obscurity allows this.

### Translation notes

- ‘On the Best Kind of Translation’ is Jerome’s Ep. 57.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.34 (CSEL 34.2:385–386; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-34).

## Letter 82.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-35
- Source: CSEL 34.2:386–387
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he opposes reading Jerome’s Hebrew-based translation in church only to avoid scandal, and would keep ‘gourd’ in Jonah.

### Latin text

Ideo autem desidero interpretationem tuam de septuaginta. ut et tanta Latinorum interpretum, qui qualescumque hoc ausi sunt, quantum possumus, inperitia careamus et hi, qui me inuidere putant utilibus laboribus tuis, tandem aliquando, si fieri potest, intellegant propterea me nolle tuam ex Hebraeo interpretationem in ecclesiis legi, ne contra septuaginta auctoritatem tamquam nouum aliquid proferentes magno scandalo perturbemus plebes Christi, quarum aures et corda illam interpretationem audire consuerunt, quae etiam ab apostolis adprobata est. unde illud apud Ionam uirgultum si in Hebraeo nec hedera est nec cucurbita sed nescio quid aliud, quod trunco suo nixum nullis sustentandum adminiculis erigatur, mallem iam in omnibus Latinis cucurbitam legi; non enim frustra hoc puto septuaginta posuisse, nisi quia et huic simile sciebant.

### English translation (Claude)

I desire your translation from the Seventy for this reason: that we may be free, as far as we can, of the great unskilfulness of the Latin translators, of whatever sort, who have ventured on this; and that those who think I envy your useful labours may at last, if possible, understand that the reason I do not wish your translation from the Hebrew to be read in the churches is that we may not, by bringing forward something new, as it were, against the authority of the Seventy, disturb with great scandal the peoples of Christ, whose ears and hearts are accustomed to hear that translation, which was also approved by the apostles. Hence, as to that plant in Jonah, if in the Hebrew it is neither ivy nor gourd but something else that stands upright, resting on its own stem, needing no props to support it, I would rather that ‘gourd’ were now read in all the Latin copies; for I do not think the Seventy put this without reason, but because they knew that this too was similar.

### Scripture references

- Jonah 4:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jonah 4:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.35 (CSEL 34.2:386–387; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-35).

## Letter 82.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-36
- Source: CSEL 34.2:387–388
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by promising to take care that his letters reach Jerome first, and asks that they keep the freedom of friendship to criticize each other.

### Latin text

Satis me, immo fortasse plus quam satis tribus epistulis tuis respondisse arbitror, quarum duas per Cyprianum accepi, unam per Firmum. rescribe, quod uisum fuerit, ad nos uel alios instruendos. dabo autem operam diligentiorem, quantum me adiuuat dominus, ut litterae, quas ad te scribo, prius ad te perueniant quam ad quemquam, a quo latius dispergantur. fateor enim nec mihi hoc fieri uelle de tuis ad me, quod de meis ad te factum iustissime expostulas. tamen placeat nobis inuicem non tantum caritas uerum etiam libertas amicitiae, ne apud me taceas uel ego apud te, quod in nostris litteris uicissim nos mouet, eo scilicet animo, qui oculis dei in fraterna dilectione non displicet. quod si inter nos fieri posse sine ipsius dilectionis perniciosa offensione non putas, non fiat. illa enim caritas, quam tecum habere uellem, profecto maior est, sed melius haec minor quam nulla est.

### English translation (Claude)

I think I have answered your three letters sufficiently, or perhaps more than sufficiently; two of them I received by Cyprian, one by Firmus. Write back what you think fit, for the instruction of us or of others. And I will take greater care, as far as the Lord helps me, that the letters I write to you reach you before they reach anyone by whom they may be spread more widely. For I confess that I would not wish that to happen with your letters to me which you most justly complain has happened with mine to you. Yet let us agree to have between us not only the love but also the freedom of friendship, so that neither you with me nor I with you keep silent about what troubles us in each other’s writings, in that spirit, namely, which does not displease the eyes of God in brotherly love. But if you do not think this can happen between us without hurtful offence to that love itself, let it not happen. For the love I would like to have with you is certainly greater; but this lesser one is better than none.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 82.36 (CSEL 34.2:387–388; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/82-18/#p-82-36).

## Letter 83.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:388
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Alypius about restoring the good will of the church of Thiave and proposes a joint letter to them.

### Latin text

Tristitia Thiauensis ecclesiae cor meum conquiescere non permittit, donec eos tecum audiam in pristinum animum restitutos, quod cito faciendum est. si enim de homine uno tantum sategit apostolus dicens: Ne maiore tristitia absorbeatur, qui eius modi est, ubi etiam ait: Ut non possideamur a satana, non enim ignoramus mentes eius, quanto magis nos oportet uigilanter agere, ne hoc in toto grege plangamus et maxime in eis, qui nunc catholicae paci accesserunt et quos nullo modo relinquere possum. sed quia temporis non siuit angustia, ut simul inde nobis diligenter deliberatam liceret eliquare sententiam, quid mihi post digressum nostrum diu cogitanti placuerit, accipiat sanctitas tua et, si tibi quoque placet, iam litterae, quas ad eos communi nomine scripsi. sine dilatione mittantur.

### English translation (Claude)

The sadness of the church of Thiave does not let my heart rest until I hear that they have been restored with you to their former good will, which must be done quickly. For if the apostle took such pains over a single man, saying, ‘Lest such a one be swallowed up by excessive sorrow,’ where he also says, ‘That we may not be taken advantage of by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his designs,’ how much more must we act watchfully, so as not to have to lament this in a whole flock, and especially in those who have now come over to Catholic peace and whom I can in no way abandon. But since the shortness of time did not allow us to work out a carefully considered decision together there, let your Holiness hear what has seemed best to me after long thought since we parted; and, if you also agree, let the letter which I have written to them in our joint name be sent without delay.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Alypius, bishop of Thagaste. Quotations of 2 Cor 2:7, 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.1 (CSEL 34.2:388; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-1).

## Letter 83.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:388–389
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues against Alypius’s compromise of splitting the disputed property, since it would make the bishops look avaricious.

### Latin text

Dixisti, ut dimidium habeant et alterum dimidium eis a me undecumque prouideretur. ego autem puto, quia. si totum eis auferretur, esset, quod diceremur non de pecunia nos sed de iustitia tantopere laborasse. cum uero dimidium eis concedimus et eo modo cum eis pacem quandoque componimus, satis apparebit nostram curam nihil aliud quam pecuniariam fuisse et uides, quae pernicies consequatur. et illis enim uidebimur alienam rem dimidiam tulisse et illi nobis uidebuntur inhoneste et inique se passos fuisse, ut adiuuarentur de dimidio, quod totum pauperum fuerat. nam quod dixisti: Cauendum est. ne, cum rem dubiam emendari uolumus, maiora uulnera faciamus, tantundem ualebit, si eis dimidium concedatur. propter ipsum quippe dimidium illi, quorum conuersioni consulere uolumus, ut hoc exemplo secum agatur, rerum suarum uenditionem per moras illas excusatorias dilaturi sunt. deinde mirum, si de re dubia est totius plebis tam grande scandalum, cum episcopos suos, quos pro magno habent, sordida auaritia maculatos putant, dum maligna species non uitatur?

### English translation (Claude)

You said that they should have half, and that the other half should be provided for them by me from some source or other. But I think that if the whole were taken from them, there would be grounds for saying that we had laboured so hard not over money but over justice. But when we grant them half and in that way make peace with them at last, it will be quite apparent that our concern was nothing but money; and you see what harm follows. For we shall seem to them to have taken half of what belonged to another, and they will seem to us to have suffered dishonestly and unjustly being helped with half of what had wholly belonged to the poor. For what you said, ‘We must take care that, in wishing to put right a doubtful matter, we do not make greater wounds,’ will apply equally if half is granted to them. For because of that very half, those whose conversion we wish to provide for, so that they may be dealt with by this precedent, will put off the sale of their property by those excusing delays. And then, is it any wonder if there is so great an offence to a whole congregation over a doubtful matter, when they think their bishops, whom they regard highly, are stained with sordid avarice, while the appearance of evil is not avoided?

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The dispute concerned the property of the presbyter Honoratus, formerly a monk of Thagaste and now ordained at Thiave: whether it belonged to the monastery of Thagaste or to the church of Thiave. Allusion to 1 Thess 5:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.2 (CSEL 34.2:388–389; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-2).

## Letter 83.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:389–390
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that in future monks dispose of their property before entering, and that in this case the property be left to Thiave to avoid scandal.

### Latin text

Nam cum quisque ad monasterium conuertitur, si ueraci corde conuertitur, illud non cogitat maxime admonitus, quantum malum sit. si autem fallax est et sua quaerit, non quae Iesu Christi, non habet utique caritatem et quid ei prodest, si distribuerit omnia sua pauperibus et tradiderit corpus suum, ut ardeat? huc accedit, quia illud, sicut iam conlocuti sumus, deinceps uitari potest et agi cum eo, qui conuertitur, si non potest admitti ad societatem fratrum, antequam se omnibus illis impedimentis exuerit et ex otio tendatur, cum eius res iam esse destiterit. haec autem mors infirmorum et tantum impedimentum salutis eorum, pro quibus tantopere laboramus, ut eos catholicae paci lucremur, aliter uitari non potest, nisi ut apertissime intellegant nullo modo nos de pecunia satagere in talibus causis, quod nullo modo intellecturi sunt, nisi illam rem, quam semper presbyteri esse putauerunt, eorum usibus relinquamus, quia et, si eius non erat, hoc ab initio scire debuerant.

### English translation (Claude)

For when anyone turns to the monastery, if he turns with a truthful heart, he does not think of that, especially when warned how great an evil it is. But if he is deceitful and seeks his own interests, not those of Jesus Christ, he certainly does not have love, and what does it profit him if he gives all his goods to the poor and hands over his body to be burned? Besides, as we have already discussed, that can be avoided in future, and it can be arranged with one who turns to the monastery that he may not be admitted to the fellowship of the brothers until he has stripped himself of all those encumbrances and rests at leisure, when his property has ceased to be his. But this death of the weak and this great obstacle to the salvation of those for whom we labour so hard to win them to Catholic peace cannot be avoided otherwise than by their understanding most plainly that we are in no way concerned about money in such cases; and they will in no way understand this unless we leave to their use that property which they always thought belonged to the presbyter, because, even if it was not his, they ought to have known this from the beginning.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Phil 2:21; 1 Cor 13:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.3 (CSEL 34.2:389–390; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-3).

## Letter 83.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:390–391
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that a cleric’s property belong to the church where he is ordained, notes that by civil law Honoratus’s property is his own, and reports that bishop Samsucius was shocked at their earlier position.

### Latin text

Videtur itaque mihi haec regula esse in rebus huiusce modi retinenda, ut, quicquid eo iure, quo talia possidentur, eius fuerit, qui alicubi clericus ordinatur, ad eam pertineat ecclesiam, in qua ordinatur. usque adeo autem eodem iure presbyteri Honorati est illud, unde agitur, ut non solum alibi ordinatus sed adhuc in Tagastensi monasterio constitutus si re sua non uendita nec per manifestam donationem in quempiam translata moreretur, non nisi heredes eius in eam succederent, sicut frater Aemilianus in illos triginta solidos fratri Priuato successit. haec ergo ante praecauenda sunt; si autem praecauta non fuerint, ea iura eis seruare oportet, quae talibus habendis uel non habendis secundum ciuilem societatem sunt instituta, ut ab omni non solum re sed etiam specie maligna, quantum possumus, nos abstineamus et bonam famam custodiamus dispensationi nostrae multum necessariam. quam uero species maligna sit, aduertat sancta prudentia tua. excepta illorum tristitia, quam experti sumus, ne quid forte ipse fallerer, sicut fieri solet, dum in sententiam meam procliuior erro, narraui causam fratri et collegae nostro Samsucio nondum dicens, quod mihi modo uidetur, sed illud potius adiungens, quod utrique nostrum uisum sit. cum illis resisteremus. uehementer exhorruit et nobis hoc uisum esse miratus est nulla re alia permotus nisi ipsa specie foeda, non nostra sed cuiuslibet uita ac moribus indignissima.

### English translation (Claude)

It seems to me, therefore, that in matters of this kind this rule should be kept: whatever belonged, by the right by which such things are owned, to one who is ordained a cleric somewhere, should belong to the church in which he is ordained. And the property in question belongs to the presbyter Honoratus by that same right to such an extent that, not only if he had been ordained elsewhere but even if he were still living in the monastery of Thagaste, should he die without having sold his property or transferred it to anyone by a manifest gift, none but his heirs would succeed to it, as brother Aemilianus succeeded brother Privatus in those thirty solidi. These things, then, must be guarded against beforehand; but if they have not been guarded against, we must preserve for them those rights which are established by civil society for owning or not owning such things, so that we may abstain, as far as we can, not only from every evil thing but also from every appearance of evil, and keep a good reputation, which is very necessary for our stewardship. And how evil the appearance is, let your holy Prudence consider. Apart from their sadness, which we have experienced, lest I should perhaps be mistaken, as often happens when I err through being too inclined to my own opinion, I told the case to our brother and colleague Samsucius, not yet saying what seems right to me now, but rather adding what had seemed right to us both when we resisted them. He was greatly shocked and wondered that we had thought this, moved by nothing else than the foul appearance itself, most unworthy not of our life and character only, but of anyone’s.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 1 Thess 5:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.4 (CSEL 34.2:390–391; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-4).

## Letter 83.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:391
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Alypius to send the joint letter, citing Christ’s paying the temple tax and Paul’s refusing support to avoid offence.

### Latin text

Proinde obsecro, ut epistulam, quam eis communi nomine scripsi, subscriptam non differas mittere. et si forte illic illud iustum acutissime peruides, non cogantur infirmi modo discere, quod ego nondum intellego, ut hoc circa eos in hac causa seruetur, quod dominus ait: Multa habeo uobis dicere, sed non potestis illa portare modo. tali quippe infirmitati parcens etiam illud de tributo soluendo ait: Ergo liberi sunt filii; sed ne scandalizemus eos et cetera, quando Petrum misit. ut didrachmas, quae tunc exigebantur, soluerent. nouerat enim aliud ius, quo nihil tale debebat; sed eo iure tributum ei ille soluebat, quo iure diximus heredem presbyteri Honorati successurum fuisse, si, antequam rem suam uel donaret uel uenderet, moreretur. quamquam in ipso ecclesiae iure Paulus apostolus parcit infirmis et debitum stipendium non exigit certus conscientia, quod rectissime exigeret, sed nihil aliud quam suspicionem deuitans bonum odorem Christi turbantem et ab illa maligna specie sese abstinens in eis regionibus, ubi hoc nouerat oportere, et forte antequam tristitiam hominum fuisset expertus. sed nos tardiores uel experti corrigamus, quod praeuidere debuimus.

### English translation (Claude)

I beseech you, therefore, not to delay signing and sending the letter which I wrote to them in our joint name. And even if you perhaps see most keenly that there is justice on that side, let the weak not be forced now to learn what I do not yet understand, so that what the Lord said may be observed toward them in this case: ‘I have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.’ Sparing such weakness, he also said about paying the tax, ‘Then the sons are free; but lest we offend them,’ and so on, when he sent Peter to pay the two-drachma tax that was then being demanded. For he knew another right, by which he owed no such thing; but he paid the tax by that right by which, as we said, the heir of the presbyter Honoratus would have succeeded if he had died before giving away or selling his property. And yet even in the church’s own right the apostle Paul spares the weak and does not demand the wages due to him, though certain in conscience that he would demand them most rightly, but simply avoiding a suspicion that would disturb the good fragrance of Christ, and abstaining from that appearance of evil in those regions where he knew it was needful, and perhaps before he had experienced people’s sadness. But let us, slower as we are, at least correct after experience what we ought to have foreseen.

### Scripture references

- John 16:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 17:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 17:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:12: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 2:15: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 11:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: John 16:12; Matt 17:24–27; 1 Cor 9:12–18; 2 Cor 2:15; 2 Cor 11:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.5 (CSEL 34.2:391; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-5).

## Letter 83.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:391–392
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine agrees, if Alypius thinks it just, to owe the Thagaste monastery half the sum, to be paid when the Hippo monastery can afford it.

### Latin text

Postremo, quia omnia timeo et memini, in digressu nostro quid proposueris, quod me fratres Tagastenses teneant debitorem in dimidio illius pretii, si hoc iustum esse liquido perspicis, ea dum taxat condicione non abnuo, ut, cum habuero, reddam, id est cum aliquid tantum obuenerit Hipponiensi monasterio, ubi hoc sine angustia fieri possit, ut tanta ibi summa detracta non minus quam aequalis pro numero cohabitantium pars ad nostros perueniat.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, since I fear everything, and I remember what you proposed when we parted, that the brothers of Thagaste should hold me their debtor for half of that sum: if you see clearly that this is just, I do not refuse, but only on this condition, that I pay it when I have it, that is, when so much comes to the monastery of Hippo that it can be done there without hardship, so that, when so great a sum has been taken away there, no less than an equal share, in proportion to the number of those living together, may come to ours.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 83.6 (CSEL 34.2:391–392; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-83-6).

## Letter 84.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-84-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:392–393
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains to bishop Novatus why he cannot return Novatus’s brother, the deacon Lucillus, comparing his own separation from his friend Severus.

### Latin text

Et ego sentio, quam durus uidear, et me ipse uix fero, quod filium meum diaconum Lucillum germanum tuum sanctitati tuae non mitto atque permitto. sed cum ipse quoque aliquos ex tuis nutrimentis ualde carissimos atque dulcissimos necessitatibus ecclesiarum longe abs te positarum concedere coeperis, tunc senties, quibus desideriorum stimulis fodiar, quod quidam mihi maxima et dulcissima familiaritate coniuncti non sunt etiam corporaliter mecum. nam ut longe mittam cognationem tuam, quantum libet ualeat germanitas tui sanguinis, non uincit amicitiae uinculum, quo nobis inuicem ego et frater Seuerus inhaeremus; et tamen nosti, quam raro mihi eum uidere contingat. atque hoc fecit non utique uoluntas uel mea uel illius, sed dum matris ecclesiae necessitates propter futurum saeculum, quo nobiscum inseparabiliter conuiuemus, nostri temporis necessitatibus anteponimus. quanto ergo aequius te tolerare oportet pro utilitate ipsius matris ecclesiae eius fratris absentiam, cum quo non tam diu cibum dominicum ruminas. quam diu ego cum dulcissimo conciue meo Seuero, qui mecum tamen nunc uix et interdum per exiguas chartulas loquitur et eas quidem plures aliarum curarum et negotiorum refertas quam portantes aliquid nostrorum in Christi suauitate pratorum!

### English translation (Claude)

I too feel how hard I seem, and I can scarcely bear myself, in that I do not send and give up to your Holiness my son the deacon Lucillus, your brother. But when you yourself begin to give up some of those you have brought up, very dear and very sweet to you, to the needs of churches far away from you, then you will feel with what goads of longing I am pierced because some who are joined to me in the greatest and sweetest intimacy are not with me in body too. For, to set aside your kinship, however strong the brotherhood of your blood, it does not surpass the bond of friendship by which brother Severus and I cling to each other; and yet you know how rarely I have the chance to see him. And neither his will nor mine brought this about, but our putting the needs of our mother the church, for the sake of the world to come, in which we shall live together inseparably, before the needs of our own time. How much more fair is it, then, that you should bear, for the benefit of that same mother church, the absence of your brother, with whom you have not chewed the Lord’s food so long as I have with my sweetest fellow citizen Severus, who nevertheless now speaks with me scarcely, and sometimes only through tiny notes, and those mostly filled with other cares and business rather than bearing anything from our meadows in the sweetness of Christ!

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Novatus, bishop of Sitifis. Severus was bishop of Milevis.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 84.1 (CSEL 34.2:392–393; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-84-1).

## Letter 84.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-84-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:393–394
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Lucillus’s knowledge of Latin is badly needed in his region, where Latin is scarce, and asks Novatus not to press the request.

### Latin text

Hic forsitan dicas: Quid enim? et apud nos germanus meus ecclesiae non erit utilis aut propter aliud eum mecum habere desidero? plane si tantum ibi, quantum hic mihi eius praesentia lucrandis uel regendis ouibus domini utilis uideretur, non dico duritiam sed iniquitatem meam nemo non iure culparet. sed cum Latina lingua, cuius inopia in nostris regionibus euangelica dispensatio multum laborat, illic autem eiusdem linguae usus omnino sit, — itane censes nos saluti plebium domini oportere consulere, ut hanc facultatem illuc mittamus et hinc auferamus, ubi eam magno cordis aestu requirimus? da itaque ueniam, quod non solum contra tuum desiderium sed etiam contra sensum meum facio, quod me facere sarcinae nostrae cura constringit. dabit tibi dominus, in quo posuisti cor tuum, ut tales sint labores tui, ut pro isto beneficio remunereris; sic enim regionum nostrarum ardentissimae siti diaconum Lucillum tu potius concessisti; neque enim parum praestabis, cum de hac re nulla petitione me ulterius onerabis, ne nihil aliud quam durior appaream uenerabili mihi et sanctae beniuolentiae tuae.

### English translation (Claude)

Here perhaps you may say: ‘What then? Will my brother not be useful to the church with us too, or do I desire to have him with me for some other reason?’ Certainly, if his presence there seemed as useful for winning or governing the Lord’s sheep as it seems to me here, everyone would rightly blame, I do not say my hardness, but my injustice. But since the Latin language, for lack of which the preaching of the gospel labours greatly in our regions, is in full use there, do you think that we ought to provide for the salvation of the Lord’s peoples by sending this ability there and taking it from here, where we seek it with great anxiety of heart? Forgive me, then, for doing, not only against your desire but also against my own feeling, what the care of our burden compels me to do. The Lord, in whom you have set your heart, will grant that your labours be such that you are rewarded for this kindness; for so you will rather have given up the deacon Lucillus to the most burning thirst of our regions. And you will do me no small service if you burden me with no further request on this matter, so that I may not appear merely harsh to your venerable and holy kindness.

### Translation notes

- The text as printed reads Latina lingua (Latin); the older (Maurist) text and the NPNF translation have Punic, which fits the argument better (Punic was the language of much of the rural population around Hippo). Translated as printed; the reading is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 84.2 (CSEL 34.2:393–394; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-84-2).

## Letter 85.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-85-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:394–395
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells bishop Paulus that he withholds communion not from hatred but because he cannot flatter him, and that Paulus’s worldly conduct has gravely wounded the church of Hippo.

### Latin text

Tam inexorabilem me non uocares, nisi etiam mendacem putares. quid enim aliud de animo meo credis, quando talia mihi scribis, nisi teneri aduersus te naeuum discordiae et odium detestandum, quasi in re manifesta non caueam, ne aliis praedicans ipse reprobus inueniar, aut ita uelim eicere stipulam de oculo tuo, ut in meo trabem nutriam? non est, quod putas. ecce iterum dico et testor deum, quia. si tu tibi ea uelles, quae tibi ego uolo, iam olim securus in Christo uiueres et in nominis eius gloria totam eius ecclesiam laetificares. ecce iam scripsi non tantum te esse fratrem meum sed etiam collegam meum; neque enim fieri potest, ut non sit collega meus quilibet episcopus ecclesiae catholicae, qualiscumque sit, nullo ecclesiastico iudicio damnatus. sed ut tibi non communicem, nulla causa est, nisi quia tibi adulari non possum. tibi enim maxime debeo, quia in Christo Iesu per euangelium ego te genui salubrem mordacitatem caritatis ueraciter obiurgando. et ita gaudeo multos in ecclesiam catholicam adiuuante domino per te esse collectos. ut non debeam plangere plures inde dispergi. sic enim uulnerasti ecclesiam Hipponiensem, ut, nisi te dominus omnibus curis et sarcinis saecularibus expeditum ad ueram episcopalem uitam uictumque reuocauerit, tale uulnus sanari non possit.

### English translation (Claude)

You would not call me so inexorable unless you thought me a liar too. For what else do you believe of my mind when you write such things to me, except that I hold against you a blemish of discord and detestable hatred, as if in a plain matter I did not take care lest, preaching to others, I myself should be found reprobate, or as if I wished to cast the mote out of your eye while nourishing the beam in my own? It is not as you think. See, I say again, and I call God to witness: if you wished for yourself what I wish for you, you would long ago be living securely in Christ and gladdening his whole church in the glory of his name. See, I have already written that you are not only my brother but my colleague; for it cannot be that any bishop of the Catholic Church, whatever he may be, who has been condemned by no church judgment, is not my colleague. But there is no reason for my not being in communion with you except that I cannot flatter you. For I owe you most of all, since in Christ Jesus through the gospel I begot you, by truly rebuking you with the wholesome sharpness of love. And while I rejoice that many have been gathered into the Catholic Church through you, with the Lord’s help, I must not cease to lament that more are being scattered from it. For you have so wounded the church of Hippo that, unless the Lord frees you from all worldly cares and burdens and calls you back to a true episcopal life and way of living, such a wound cannot be healed.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:27: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:3: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Paulus, a Catholic bishop (perhaps of Cataquas), a convert from Donatism. Allusions to 1 Cor 9:27; Matt 7:3–5; 1 Cor 4:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 85.1 (CSEL 34.2:394–395; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-85-1).

## Letter 85.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-85-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:395–396
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes Paulus for re-entangling himself in worldly business and living beyond his church’s means, and urges him to true episcopal life.

### Latin text

Cum autem tu magis magisque te implicare non cesses, ut etiam rebus, quibus renuntiasti, te post renuntiationem inserueris, quod nec apud ipsas humanas leges ullo modo defendi potest, et in ea professione uiuere dicaris, cui frugalitas ecclesiae tuae sufficere non possit, ut quid quaeris communionem meam, cum audire numquam uolueris admonitionem meam? an ut, quicquid facis, mihi inputent homines, quorum querelas sustinere non possum? frustra autem suspicaris eos esse obtrectatores tuos, qui tibi semper et in uita priore aduersati sunt. non est ita nec mirum, quod multa te latent. sed etiam si hoc uerum esset, nihil in tuis moribus inuenire debuerunt, quod recte reprehenderent et unde ecclesiam blasphemarent. adhuc me putas fortasse ideo ista dicere, quia non accepi satisfactionem tuam. immo propterea dico, ne ipse non possim satis deo facere de peccatis meis, si haec tibi tacuero. noui, quia cor habes, sed et tardum securum est, quando in caelo est, et acutum cor nihil est, quando in terra est. non est episcopatus artificium transigendae uitae fallacis. docebit te, quod dico, dominus deus, qui tibi interclusit omnes uias, ad quas illo uti uoluisti, ut dirigat te, si intellegas, in illam uiam, propter quam ambulandam tibi tam sancta sarcina inposita est.

### English translation (Claude)

But since you do not cease to entangle yourself more and more, so that you have even involved yourself, after renouncing them, in affairs which you renounced, which cannot be defended in any way even by human laws, and you are said to live in a manner which the frugal means of your church cannot support, why do you seek my communion, when you have never been willing to hear my admonition? Is it so that men, whose complaints I cannot bear, may blame me for whatever you do? You suspect in vain that those who have always opposed you, even in your former life, are your detractors. It is not so; nor is it surprising that many things escape you. But even if this were true, they ought to have found nothing in your conduct that they could rightly blame and by which they could blaspheme the church. Perhaps you still think I say these things because I have not accepted your apology. On the contrary, I say them so that I myself may not be unable to make satisfaction to God for my sins, if I keep silent to you about these things. I know that you have a heart; but even a slow heart is secure when it is in heaven, and a sharp heart is nothing when it is on earth. The episcopate is not a craft for living a deceitful life. The Lord God will teach you what I say, he who has closed to you all the ways by which you wished to use it, that he may direct you, if you understand, into that way for the sake of walking in which so holy a burden was laid upon you.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to 2 Tim 2:4 (entanglement in worldly affairs).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 85.2 (CSEL 34.2:395–396; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-85-2).

## Letter 86.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-86-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:396–397
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the governor Caecilianus to enforce his edict for Catholic unity in the region of Hippo, preferring deterrence to punishment of the Donatists.

### Latin text

Administrationis tuae castitas et fama uirtutum, pietatis quoque Christianae laudanda diligentia et fida sinceritas, quae tibi diuina munera eo donante gaudes tributa, a quo speras promittente potiora, excitauerunt me, ut hoc epistulari alloquio aestus causarum mearum excellentia participaret tua. quantum enim per alias Africae terras te unitati catholicae mirabili efficacia consuluisse gaudemus, tantum dolemus regionem Hipponiensium-Regiorum et ei uicinas partes confines Numidiae praesidali edicti tui uigore nondum adiuuari meruisse, domine eximie et in Christi caritate uere meritoque honorabilis ac suspiciende fili. quod ne meae potius neglegentiae deputetur, qui episcopalem sarcinam Hippone sustineo. tuae magnificentiae non tacendum putaui. quantum etiam in campo Hipponiensi haeretica praesumat audacia, si ex fratribus et collegis meis, qui haec tuae sublimitati narrare potuerint, uel ex presbytero, quem cum litteris misi, fueris audire dignatus, adiuuante domino deo nostro procul dubio prouidebis, ut tumor sacrilegae uanitatis terrendo sanetur potius, quam ulciscendo resecetur.

### English translation (Claude)

The integrity of your administration and the fame of your virtues, and also the praiseworthy diligence of your Christian piety and your faithful sincerity, divine gifts which you rejoice to have been bestowed on you by him from whom you hope, by his promise, for better things, have moved me to let your Excellency share, by this letter, in the anxiety of my concerns. For as much as we rejoice that throughout the other lands of Africa you have provided for Catholic unity with wonderful effectiveness, so much do we grieve that the region of Hippo Regius and the neighbouring parts bordering Numidia have not yet been worthy to be helped by the force of your edict as governor, my excellent lord and son, truly and deservedly honourable and to be revered in the love of Christ. Lest this be imputed rather to my negligence, who bear the burden of the episcopate at Hippo, I thought I should not keep silent before your Magnificence. How far heretical audacity presumes even in the district of Hippo, you will learn if you deign to hear it from my brothers and colleagues, who can tell your Sublimity of it, or from the presbyter whom I have sent with this letter; and with the help of the Lord our God you will doubtless provide that the swelling of sacrilegious vanity be healed by deterring it rather than cut off by punishing it.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Caecilianus, imperial governor in Africa, ca. 405. Concerns the enforcement of imperial measures against the Donatists; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 86.1 (CSEL 34.2:396–397; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-86-1).

## Letter 87.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:397–398
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the Donatist bishop Emeritus, arguing that the churches overseas cannot be defiled by African crimes they never knew of, any more than Donatists are defiled by hidden sinners among them.

### Latin text

Ego cum audio quemquam bono ingenio praeditum doctrinisque liberalibus eruditum, quamquam non ibi salus animae constituta sit, tamen in quaestione facillima sentire aliud, quam ueritas postulat, quo magis miror, eo magis exardesco nosse hominem et cum eo conloqui uel, si id non possim, saltem litteris, quae longissime uolant, adtingere mentem eius atque ab eo uicissim adtingi desidero, sicut te esse audio talem uirum et ab ecclesia catholica, quae, sicut sancto spiritu praenuntiata est, toto orbe diffunditur, discerptum doleo atque seclusum. quam ob causam, nescio. nam certum est magnae parti Romani orbis, ne dicam etiam barbaris gentibus, quibus quoque debitorem se dicebat apostolus, quorum Christianae fidei communio nostra contexitur, ignotam esse partem Donati nec eos omnino scire, uel quando uel quibus causis exorta sit ista dissensio. quos utique omnes. Christianos ab eis Christianos, quae Afris obicitis, nisi innocentes esse fatearis, cogeris dicere omnium malis factis obnoxios, cum apud uos perditi, ut mitius dixerim, latent. uos omnes esse pollutos. non enim neminem de uestra communione pellitis aut tunc primum pellitis. cum primum illud. unde pellendus est, fecerit. an non aliquanto tempore latentem et postea proditum conuictumque damnatis? quaero igitur, utrum uos contaminauerit eo tempore, quo latebat. respondebis: Nullo modo nullo ergo tempore contaminaret, etiam si semper id lateret; nam et mortuorum nonnulla saepe commissa produntur nec fraudi est Christianis, qui eis communicauere uiuentibus. cur ergo uos tam temeraria atque sacrilega diremptione praecidistis a communione innumerabilium ecclesiarum orientalium, quas semper latuit et adhuc latet, quod in Africa gestum esse aut docetis aut fingitis?

### English translation (Claude)

When I hear of anyone endowed with good ability and educated in liberal learning holding, on a very easy question, a view other than the truth requires (although the salvation of the soul is not placed in such learning), the more I wonder at it, the more I burn to know the man and to talk with him; or, if I cannot, I desire at least to reach his mind by letters, which fly very far, and in turn to be reached by him. Such a man I hear that you are, and I grieve that you are torn away and shut off from the Catholic Church, which, as was foretold by the Holy Spirit, is spread throughout the whole world. For what reason, I do not know. For it is certain that to a great part of the Roman world, not to say also the barbarian nations, to whom too the apostle said he was a debtor, with whose communion in the Christian faith ours is joined, the party of Donatus is unknown, and that they do not know at all either when or for what reasons this dissension arose. All these Christians, unless you admit that they are innocent of what you charge against the Africans, you are forced to say are liable for the evil deeds of all; and, since among you the lost (to put it mildly) lie hidden, you must say that you are all defiled. For it is not that you expel no one from your communion, nor that you expel a man at the very moment he first does that for which he must be expelled. Do you not condemn one who lay hidden for some time and was afterwards exposed and convicted? I ask, then, whether he defiled you at the time when he lay hidden. You will answer, ‘By no means.’ Then he would never defile you, even if it always lay hidden; for some things done by the dead are often brought to light, and it does no harm to the Christians who communicated with them while they lived. Why, then, have you cut yourselves off by so rash and sacrilegious a severance from the communion of the countless churches of the East, from which what you either teach or invent was done in Africa has always been and is still hidden?

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Emeritus, Donatist bishop of Caesarea in Mauretania. The middle of the section (‘All these Christians … you are all defiled’) is garbled in the digital text (stray ‘(.’ and a repeated ‘Christianos ab eis’); translated by sense. Allusion to Rom 1:14. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.1 (CSEL 34.2:397–398; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-1).

## Letter 87.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:398–399
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that no one is defiled by unknown sinners, and that even known sinners do not harm the good who mourn their sins, as Ezekiel and Paul show.

### Latin text

Alia enim quaestio est, utrum illa uera dicatis, quae quidem nos multo probabilioribus documentis falsa esse conuincimus et in uestris magis ea ipsa, quae obicitis, tunc probata declaramus. sed haec, ut dixi, alia quaestio est tunc adgredienda et discutienda, cum opus fuerit. illud nunc adtendat uigilantia mentis tuae neminem contaminari posse ignotorum ignotisque criminibus. unde manifestum est a communione orbis, cui seu falsa seu uera crimina, quae Afris intenditis, prorsus ignota sunt et ignota semper fuerunt, sacrilego schismate uos esse separatos. quamquam et illud non est tacendum etiam cognitos malos bonis non obesse in ecclesia, si eos a communione prohibendi aut potestas desit aut aliqua ratio conseruandae pacis impediat. qui sunt enim, qui apud prophetam Ezechielem et ante uastationem perditorum signari meruerunt et, cum illi uastarentur, euadere inlaesi, nisi, ut ibi manifestissime ostenditur, qui maerent et gemunt peccata et iniquitates populi dei, quae fiunt in medio eorum? quis autem, quod ignorat, gemit et maeret? ex eadem ratione etiam Paulus apostolus falsos fratres tolerat; non enim de incognitis ait: Omnes enim sua quaerunt, non quae Iesu Christi, quos tamen secum fuisse manifestat. ex quo autem genere sunt, qui uel turificare idolis uel codices diuinos tradere quam mori maluerunt, nisi ex eorum, qui sua quaerunt, non quae Iesu Christi?

### English translation (Claude)

For it is another question whether what you say is true; we, indeed, show by much more convincing documents that it is false, and we declare that the very things you charge were then proved rather against your own side. But this, as I said, is another question, to be taken up and discussed when necessary. Let the watchfulness of your mind now attend to this: that no one can be defiled by the unknown crimes of unknown men. From which it is plain that you have separated yourselves by sacrilegious schism from the communion of the world, to which the crimes you charge against the Africans, whether false or true, are wholly unknown and always have been. Although this too must not be passed over, that even known wicked men do no harm to the good in the church, if either the power to exclude them from communion is lacking or some reason of preserving peace prevents it. For who are those in the prophet Ezekiel who were found worthy to be marked before the destruction of the lost, and to escape unharmed when they were destroyed, except, as is most plainly shown there, those who mourn and groan over the sins and iniquities of the people of God that are done in their midst? But who groans and mourns over what he does not know? For the same reason the apostle Paul also bears with false brethren; for he does not speak of unknown people when he says, ‘For all seek their own, not the things of Jesus Christ,’ and yet he shows that they were with him. And of what kind are those who preferred to offer incense to idols or to hand over the divine books rather than die, if not of those who seek their own, not the things of Jesus Christ?

### Scripture references

- Ezek 9:4: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:26: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Ezek 9:4–6; quotation of Phil 2:21; allusion to 2 Cor 11:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.2 (CSEL 34.2:398–399; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-2).

## Letter 87.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:399–400
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that sharing the altar with a sinner does not make one guilty unless one consents to his sin.

### Latin text

Multa testimonia scripturarum praetereo, ne longiorem, quam necesse est, epistulam faciam, et eruditioni tuae plura per te ipsum consideranda permitto. quod tamen satis est. uide, obsecro. si tam multi iniqui in uno populo dei eos, qui eos contestabantur, non fecerunt tales, quales ipsi erant, si multitudo illa falsorum fratrum apostolum Paulum in una cum eis ecclesia constitutum non fecit sua quaerentem, non quae Iesu Christi, manifestum est non hoc effici hominem, quod est malus quisquam, cum quo ad altare Christi acceditur, etiam si non sit incognitus, si tantum non adprobetur et a bona conscientia displicendo separetur. manifestum est igitur non esse aliud cum fure concurrere nisi uel furari cum eo uel furtum eius cordis placito accipere. hoc nos dicimus, ut quaestiones infinitas atque superfluas de factis hominum, quae rationem nostram nihil impediunt, auferamus.

### English translation (Claude)

I pass over many testimonies of the Scriptures so as not to make the letter longer than necessary, and leave more to your learning to consider for yourself. But this is enough: see, I beseech you, if so many wicked men among the one people of God did not make those who testified against them such as they themselves were, if that multitude of false brethren did not make the apostle Paul, set in one church with them, seek his own rather than the things of Jesus Christ, it is plain that a man is not made what any wicked man is with whom he approaches the altar of Christ, even if he is not unknown, provided only that he is not approved, and is separated from a good conscience by being disapproved. It is plain, therefore, that to run with a thief is nothing else than either to steal with him or to accept his theft with the consent of the heart. We say this so as to remove endless and superfluous questions about men’s deeds, which do not hinder our case at all.

### Scripture references

- Ps 50:18 (49:18 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ps 50:18 (LXX 49:18), ‘if you saw a thief, you ran with him’.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.3 (CSEL 34.2:399–400; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-3).

## Letter 87.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:400–401
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Donatists, by tolerating Optatus to avoid dividing their own party, condemn their own original division of the Church, a sin punished in Korah’s rebels.

### Latin text

Sed et uos, nisi hoc sentiatis, tales eritis omnes, qualis Optatus in uestra communione uobis non ignorantibus fuit, quod absit ab Emeriti moribus aliorumque talium, quales apud uos esse non dubito longe a factis illius alienos. neque enim uobis obicimus nisi schismatis crimen, quam etiam haeresem male perseuerando fecistis. quanti autem diuino iudicio pendatur hoc facinus, lege, quod te legisse non ambigo. inuenies Dathan et Abiron hiatu terrae deuoratos ceterosque omnes, qui eis consenserant, igne de medio eorum existente consumptos. illud ergo scelus ad exemplum deuitandi dominus deus praesenti supplicio denotauit, ut, cum talibus patientissime parcit, quali ultimo iudicio reseruet, ostenderet. neque enim reprehendimus rationes uestras, si eo tempore, quo uesana potentia furere iactabatur Optatus, cum eius accusator esset totius Africae gemitus congemescentibus uobis, si tamen talis es, qualem te praedicat fama, quod scit deus me et credere et uelle, — non ergo reprehendimus, si eo tempore, ne multos secum excommunicatos traheret et communionem uestram schismatis furore praecideret, eum excommunicare noluistis. sed hoc ipsum est, quod uos arguit in iudicio dei, frater Emerite, quia, cum uideretis tam magnum malum esse diuidi partem Donati, ut Optatus potius in communione tolerandus existimaretur, quam illud admitteretur permanetis in eo malo, quod in diuidenda ecclesia Christi a uestris maioribus perpetratum est.

### English translation (Claude)

But you too, unless you hold this, will all be such as Optatus was in your communion, with your knowledge; which far be it from the character of Emeritus and of others like him, who I do not doubt are among you, far removed from his deeds. For we charge you with nothing but the crime of schism, which by persisting in it wrongly you have also made a heresy. And how heavily this crime weighs in God’s judgment, read what I do not doubt you have read: you will find Dathan and Abiram swallowed up by the opening of the earth, and all the rest who consented with them consumed by fire that came forth from their midst. The Lord God marked that crime with present punishment as an example to be avoided, so as to show, while he spares such men most patiently, what he reserves for them at the last judgment. Nor do we find fault with your reasons, if, at the time when Optatus was boasted to be raging with mad power, when the groaning of all Africa was his accuser, and you groaned with it (if indeed you are such as report proclaims you, which God knows I both believe and wish), we do not find fault, I say, if at that time you refused to excommunicate him, lest he should drag many excommunicated with him and cut off your communion in the madness of schism. But this very thing convicts you in the judgment of God, brother Emeritus: that, seeing it to be so great an evil for the party of Donatus to be divided that Optatus was judged rather to be tolerated in communion than that this should be allowed, you persist in that evil which was committed by your forefathers in dividing the church of Christ.

### Scripture references

- Num 16:32: allusion, high confidence
- Num 16:35: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Optatus of Thamugadi, ally of the rebel Gildo (d. 398). Allusion to Num 16:31–35. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.4 (CSEL 34.2:400–401; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-4).

## Letter 87.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:401–402
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if Emeritus could plead ignorance about Optatus, the churches of the East far more can plead ignorance of the African ‘traitors’, yet the Donatists condemn and rebaptize them.

### Latin text

Hic fortasse respondendi angustia temptabis defendere Optatum. noli, frater, noli, obsecro; non te decet et, si alium aliquem forte deceat, si tamen quicquam decet malos, Emeritum certe non decet defendere Optatum. sed fortasse nec accusare. ita sit sane. utere uoce media et dic: Unusquisque sarcinam suam portat. tu quis es, qui iudices seruum alienum? si ergo ad testimonium totius Africae, immo uero terrarum omnium, quaqua uersum Gildonis fama feruebat, simul enim et ille notus erat, non ausi estis umquam de Optato iudicare, ne temere de incognitis iudicaretis, nos tandem possumus aut debemus de his, qui ante nos uixerunt, ad uestrum tantum modo testimonium temerariam de incognitis ferre sententiam, ut parum sit, quod uos ignota criminamini, nisi et nos ignota iudicemus? non enim Optatum. etiam si forte falsa periclitatur inuidia, sed te defendis, cum dicis: Ignoro, qualis ille fuerit. quanto magis ergo, quales fuerint Afri, quos ignotiores arguis, orientalis orbis ignorat! a quibus tamen ecclesiis, quarum nomina in libris habes et recitas, nefaria dissensione disiungeris. si Tamugadensem episcopum uestrum famosissimum et pessime diffamatum non dico Caesariensis sed Sitifensis collega eius eiusdemque temporis ignorabat, quo modo traditores Afros, quicumque illi fuerint, ecclesia Corinthiorum, Ephesiorum, Colossensium, Philippensium, Thessalonicensium, Antiochenorum, Ponti, Galatiae, Cappadociae ceterarumque orbis partium ab apostolis in Christo aedificatarum aut nosse potuit aut damnari a uobis meruit, quia non potuit? et tamen eis non communicatis et dicitis non esse Christianos et eos rebaptizare conamini. quid dicam? quid querar? aut quid exclamem? si cum homine cordato loquor, indignationis huius aculeos tecum participo; nam uides profecto, quae dicerem, si uellem dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

Here perhaps, under pressure to answer, you will try to defend Optatus. Do not, brother, do not, I beseech you; it does not become you, and if it perhaps becomes anyone else (if anything becomes the wicked), it certainly does not become Emeritus to defend Optatus. But perhaps not to accuse him either. So be it. Take a middle position and say, ‘Each one bears his own burden. Who are you to judge another’s servant?’ If, then, on the testimony of all Africa, nay of all lands wherever the fame of Gildo spread (for he too was known along with him), you never dared to judge Optatus, lest you should judge rashly of the unknown, can we or ought we, at last, on your testimony alone, pass rash sentence about unknown men who lived before us, so that it is not enough that you accuse unknown things unless we too judge unknown things? For you are not defending Optatus, even if he is perhaps endangered by false odium, but yourself, when you say, ‘I do not know what he was like.’ How much more, then, does the Eastern world not know what the Africans were like, whom you accuse, who are even more unknown! And yet you are separated by wicked dissension from those churches, whose names you have in your books and read out. If his colleague of Sitifis, not to say of Caesarea, at the same time did not know about your most notorious and most ill-famed bishop of Thamugadi, how could the church of the Corinthians, Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians, Thessalonians, Antiochenes, of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, and the other parts of the world built up in Christ by the apostles, either know the African traitors, whoever they were, or deserve to be condemned by you because it could not? And yet you do not communicate with them, and you say they are not Christians, and you try to rebaptize them. What shall I say? What shall I complain? Or what shall I cry out? If I am speaking with a man of sense, I share with you the stings of this indignation; for you surely see what I would say if I wished to say it.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gildo, count of Africa, rebelled in 397–398. Quotations of Gal 6:5 and Rom 14:4. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.5 (CSEL 34.2:401–402; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-5).

## Letter 87.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:402
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine mocks the idea that a Donatist council could condemn the whole world, and asks Emeritus to reply on the one question of why the schism began.

### Latin text

An forte fecerunt inter se maiores uestri concilium et damnauerunt praeter se totum orbem Christianum? itane ad hoc perducta est rerum existimatio, ut concilium Maximianensium, qui de uestra praecisione praecisi sunt, quia uobis comparati paucissimi sunt, non ualeat aduersus uos et uestrum concilium ualeat aduersus gentes hereditatem Christi et possessionem eius terminos terrae? miror, si habet in corpore sanguinem, qui de hac re non erubescit. rescribe ad ista, quaeso; a nonnullis enim, quibus non potui non credere, audiui te rescripturum, si tibi scriberem. iam etiam pridem misi unam epistulam, quam utrum acceperis uel ei responderis et forte ego tuam non acceperim, nescio. nunc interim peto, ad haec respondere ne graueris, quod tibi uidetur. sed noli te in alias tollere quaestiones; hinc enim caput est ordinatissimae inquisitionis, cur schisma factum sit

### English translation (Claude)

Or did your forefathers perhaps hold a council among themselves and condemn the whole Christian world apart from themselves? Has the estimate of things come to this, that the council of the Maximianists, who were cut off from your cutting-off, has no force against you because they are very few compared with you, while your council has force against the nations, the inheritance of Christ, and his possession, the ends of the earth? I wonder whether he who does not blush at this has blood in his body. Write back about these things, I beg you; for I have heard from some whom I could not but believe that you would write back if I wrote to you. I already sent one letter some time ago; whether you received it or answered it, and perhaps I did not receive yours, I do not know. Now, meanwhile, I ask you not to be reluctant to answer these points as you think fit. But do not carry yourself off into other questions; for here is the head of a well-ordered inquiry: why the schism was made.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Ps 2:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.6 (CSEL 34.2:402; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-6).

## Letter 87.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:402–403
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Romans 13 that the state rightly punishes evil, and that the Donatists suffer not for righteousness but for the evil of schism.

### Latin text

Nam et terrenae potestates cum schismaticos persequuntur. ea regula se defendunt, qua dicit apostolus: Qui resistit potestati, dei ordinationi resistit; qui autem resistunt, ipsi sibi iudicium adquirunt; principes enim non sunt timori bono operi sed malo. uis autem non timere potestatem, bonum fac et habebis laudem ex illa; dei enim minister est tibi in bonum. quod si malum feceris, time; non enim frustra gladium portat; dei enim minister est, uindex in iram ei, qui male agit. tota igitur quaestio est, utrum nihil mali sit schisma aut utrum schisma non feceritis, ut pro bono opere potestatibus resistatis, non pro malo, unde uobis adquiratis iudicium. propterea prouidentissime dominus non ait: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur tantum, sed addidit: Propter iustitiam. si ergo iustitia est, quam operati estis in illa dissensione, in qua etiam permanetis, secundum ea, quae supra dixi, nosse abs te cupio; si autem iniquitas est orbem Christianum damnare inauditum, uel quia non audiuit, quae uos audistis, uel quia non ei probatum est, quod temere credidistis aut sine certo documento accusastis, et ideo rebaptizare uelle tot ecclesias ipsius domini, cum hic adhuc esset in carne, et apostolorum eius praedicatione ac labore fundatas. quia uobis licet aut nescire Afros collegas uestros malos simul uiuentes simul sacramenta tractantes aut etiam scire sed tolerare, ne pars Donati diuidatur, illis autem in orbe remotissimo constitutis non licet nescire, quod uos de Afris aut nostis aut creditis aut audistis aut fingitis, quae tanta est peruersitas amplecti suam iniquitatem et potestatum accusare seueritatem?

### English translation (Claude)

For earthly powers too, when they persecute schismatics, defend themselves by that rule of which the apostle says: ‘He who resists the power resists the ordinance of God; and those who resist bring judgment on themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good work but to evil. Do you wish not to fear the power? Do good, and you will have praise from it; for it is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, fear; for it does not bear the sword in vain; for it is God’s minister, an avenger to bring wrath on him who does evil.’ The whole question, therefore, is whether schism is no evil, or whether you have not made a schism, so that you resist the powers for good work, not for evil, by which you would bring judgment on yourselves. Hence the Lord most providently did not say only, ‘Blessed are those who suffer persecution,’ but added, ‘for righteousness’ sake.’ If, then, it is righteousness that you have worked in that dissension in which you still persist, I desire to know it from you, in accordance with what I said above. But if it is iniquity to condemn the Christian world unheard, either because it has not heard what you have heard, or because what you rashly believed or accused without certain proof has not been proved to it, and therefore to wish to rebaptize so many churches founded by the preaching and labour of the Lord himself, while he was still here in the flesh, and of his apostles; because you may either not know your African colleagues to be wicked while living with them and handling the sacraments with them, or even know it but tolerate it lest the party of Donatus be divided, while those set in the most distant world may not be ignorant of what you know or believe or have heard or invent about the Africans: what great perversity it is to embrace one’s own iniquity and accuse the severity of the powers!

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:4: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Concerns imperial coercion of the Donatists; translated as written. Quotation of Rom 13:2–4; allusion to Matt 5:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.7 (CSEL 34.2:402–403; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-7).

## Letter 87.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:403–404
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends Catholics’ appeals to imperial protection against Donatist violence, citing Paul’s armed escort and Romans 13, while disapproving of any immoderate Catholic action.

### Latin text

At enim et malos Christianis non licet persequi. esto, non liceat; sed numquid hoc potestatibus ad hoc ipsum ordinatis fas est obicere? an apostolum delebimus? aut non habent codices uestri, quae paulo ante commemoraui? sed uos inquies, talibus communicare non debetis. quid ergo? uos Flauiano quondam uicario, partis uestrae homini, quia legibus seruiens nocentes, quos inuenerat, occidebat, non communicastis? sed a uobis, inquies, Romani principes aduersum nos prouocantur. immo a uobis aduersum uos ipsos, qui ecclesiam, cuius illi, sicut tanto ante praedictum est, iam membra sunt — de Christo enim dictum est: Et adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae —, et praecisione laniare ausi estis et rebaptizare pertinaciter audetis. nostri autem aduersus inlicitas et priuatas uestrorum uiolentias, quas et uos ibi, qui talia non facitis, doletis et gemitis, a potestatibus ordinatis tuitionem petunt, non qua uos persequantur, sed qua se defendant, sicut apostolus Paulus aduersus Iudaeos coniurantes, ut eum necarent, antequam esset Romanum imperium Christianum, egit, ut sibi tuitio etiam armatorum daretur. sed illi principes qualibet occasione cognoscentes uestri schismatis nefas constituunt aduersus uos pro sua sollicitudine ac potestate, quod uolunt. non enim frustra gladium portant; dei enim ministri sunt, uindices in iram in eos, qui male agunt. postremo etiam si aliqui nostrorum non Christiana moderatione ista faciunt, displicet nobis; sed tamen non propter eos relinquimus catholicam ecclesiam, si eam ante ultimum tempus uentilationis palea purgare non possumus. quando et uos propter Optatum, cum eum pellere non audebatis, partem Donati non reliquistis.

### English translation (Claude)

‘But it is not lawful for Christians to persecute even the wicked.’ Granted, let it not be lawful; but is it right to charge this against the powers ordained for this very purpose? Shall we blot out the apostle? Or do your copies not contain what I mentioned a little while ago? ‘But you,’ you will say, ‘ought not to communicate with such men.’ What then? Did you not communicate with Flavianus, formerly vicar, a man of your party, because, serving the laws, he put to death the guilty whom he found? ‘But by you,’ you will say, ‘the Roman emperors are stirred up against us.’ No, rather by yourselves against yourselves, who have dared to tear by cutting off, and persistently dare to rebaptize, the church of which they are now members, as was foretold so long ago; for it was said of Christ, ‘And all the kings of the earth shall worship him.’ But our people, against the unlawful and private violence of yours, which you too, who do not do such things, lament and groan over there, seek protection from the ordained powers, not to persecute you but to defend themselves; as the apostle Paul, before the Roman empire was Christian, acted against the Jews who conspired to kill him, so that protection even by armed men was given him. But those emperors, learning on whatever occasion of the wickedness of your schism, decree against you what they will, out of their own concern and power. ‘For they do not bear the sword in vain; for they are God’s ministers, avengers to bring wrath on those who do evil.’ Finally, even if some of our people do these things without Christian moderation, it displeases us; but we do not on their account leave the Catholic Church, if we cannot purge it of chaff before the last time of winnowing; just as you did not leave the party of Donatus on account of Optatus, when you did not dare to expel him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 23:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:4: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Concerns coercion and imperial power; translated as written. Flavianus was a Donatist imperial vicar of Africa. Quotation of Ps 72:11 (LXX 71:11); allusion to Acts 23:12–24; quotation of Rom 13:4; allusion to Matt 3:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.8 (CSEL 34.2:403–404; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-8).

## Letter 87.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:404–406
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Catholics seek to reunite the Donatists to the root of the Church, without rebaptizing them, since the sacraments they hold remain Christ’s even in schism.

### Latin text

At enim quare nos adiungi nobis uultis, si scelerati sumus? quia uiuitis adhuc et corrigi potestis, si uelitis. cum enim nobis coniungimini, hoc est ecclesiae dei, hereditati Christi, cuius possessio sunt termini terrae, uos corrigimini, ut in radice uiuatis. de ramis enim fractis sic ait apostolus: Potens est enim deus iterum inserere illos. uos ergo mutamini ex ea parte, qua dissentiebatis, quamuis sacramenta, quae habebatis, cum eadem sint in omnibus, sancta sint. quapropter uos mutari uolumus a peruersitate, id est ut denuo radicetur uestra praecisio. nam sacramenta, quae non mutastis, sicut habetis, adprobantur a nobis, ne forte, cum uestram prauitatem corrigere uolumus, illis mysteriis Christi, quae in uestra prauitate deprauata non sunt, sacrilegam faciamus iniuriam. neque enim et Saul deprauauerat unctionem, quam acceperat, cui unctioni tantum honorem rex Dauid, pius dei seruus, exhibuit. propterea ergo uos non rebaptizamus, qui radicem uobis reddere cupimus, formam tamen praecisi sarmenti, si non mutata est, adprobamus, quae tamen quamuis integra nullo modo est sine radice fructuosa. alia quaestio est de persecutionibus, quas uos dicitis pati in tanta mansuetudine et lenitate nostrorum. cum uere inlicite ac priuatim uestri faciant grauiora, alia de baptismate, quod non quaerimus ubi sit, sed ubi prosit. nam ubicumque est, ipsum est; sed non etiam ille, qui hoc accipit, ubicumque est, ipse est. itaque priuatam hominum impietatem detestamur in schismate, baptismum uero Christi ubique ueneramur, quia, si desertores secum imperatoris signa traducant, illis uel damnatione punitis uel indulgentia correctis salua signa recipiuntur, si salua manserunt. et si quid de hac re diligentius quaerendum est, alia est, ut dixi, quaestio. hoc enim obseruandum est in his rebus, quod obseruat ecclesia dei.

### English translation (Claude)

‘But why do you want us to be joined to you, if we are criminals?’ Because you are still living and can be corrected if you will. For when you are joined to us, that is, to the church of God, the inheritance of Christ, whose possession is the ends of the earth, you are corrected, so that you may live in the root. For of the broken branches the apostle says, ‘For God is able to graft them in again.’ You, then, must change in the respect in which you dissented, although the sacraments you had are holy, since they are the same in all. Therefore we wish you to be changed from your perversity, that is, that your cut-off branch be rooted again. For the sacraments, which you have not changed, are approved by us as you have them, lest perhaps, in wishing to correct your depravity, we should do sacrilegious injury to those mysteries of Christ which have not been depraved in your depravity. For neither had Saul depraved the anointing he had received, to which anointing King David, God’s devout servant, showed such honour. Therefore we do not rebaptize you, since we desire to restore you to the root; but we approve the form of the cut-off branch, if it has not been changed, which, though whole, is in no way fruitful without the root. It is another question about the persecutions which you say you suffer amid such great mildness and gentleness of our people, when yours, truly unlawfully and privately, do worse things; and another about baptism, where we ask not where it is, but where it profits. For wherever it is, it is the same; but he who receives it is not, wherever he is, the same. So we detest the private impiety of men in schism, but we venerate the baptism of Christ everywhere; for if deserters carry off the emperor’s standards with them, when they are either punished by condemnation or corrected by pardon, the standards are received back intact, if they have remained intact. And if anything about this needs to be examined more carefully, it is, as I said, another question. For in these matters we must observe what the church of God observes.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Sam 24:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- A key statement of Augustine’s view of baptism outside the Church; translated as written. Allusions: Ps 2:8; Rom 11:23; 1 Sam 24:6; 26:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.9 (CSEL 34.2:404–406; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-9).

## Letter 87.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:406–407
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Emeritus to reply on the origin of the schism, noting the Donatist misdeeds he has passed over, such as the bishop of Rusicade’s pact with the rebel Firmus.

### Latin text

Quaeritur autem, utrum uestra an nostra sit ecclesia dei. quapropter illud quaerendum est a capite, cur schisma feceritis. si non rescripseris, ego apud deum, quantum credo. facilem causam habeo, quia uiro, quem audiui excepto schismate bonum et liberaliter instructum, pacificantes litteras misi. tu uideris, quid illi respondeas, cuius nunc laudanda patientia, in fine uero timenda sententia est. si autem rescripseris ea cura, qua tibi scriptum uides, aderit misericordia dei, ut aliquando error, qui nos dirimit, et amore pacis et ratione ueritatis intereat. memento, quod de Rogatensibus non dixerim, qui uos Firmianos appellare dicuntur, sicut nos Macarianos appellatis, neque de Rusicazensi episcopo uestro, qui cum Firmo pactus perhibetur incolumitatem suorum, ut ei portae aperirentur et in uastationem darentur catholici. et alia innumerabilia. desine ergo locis communibus exaggerare facta hominum uel audita uel cognita. uides enim, quae de uestris taceam, ut de origine schismatis, ubi tota causa est, res agatur. dominus deus inspiret tibi cogitationem pacificam, desiderabilis et dilecte frater. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

The question, then, is whether the church of God is yours or ours. Therefore we must inquire from the beginning why you made the schism. If you do not write back, I believe I have an easy case before God, because I sent peaceable letters to a man whom I heard to be good, apart from his schism, and liberally educated. You must see what answer you give to him whose patience is now to be praised, but whose sentence at the end is to be feared. But if you write back with the care with which you see you have been written to, the mercy of God will be present, so that at some time the error which divides us may perish, both through love of peace and through the reason of truth. Remember that I have said nothing of the Rogatists, who are said to call you Firmians, as you call us Macarians; nor of your bishop of Rusicade, who is reported to have made a pact with Firmus for the safety of his own people, on condition that the gates were opened to him and the Catholics given up to plunder; and innumerable other things. Stop, then, inflating with commonplaces the deeds of men, whether heard of or known. For you see what I keep silent about your people, so that the matter may be argued about the origin of the schism, where the whole case lies. May the Lord God inspire in you a peaceable thought, brother longed for and beloved. Amen.

### Translation notes

- The Rogatists were a splinter group of the Donatists; ‘Macarians’ was the Donatist name for Catholics, after the imperial commissioner Macarius (347). Firmus was a Moorish rebel (372–375). Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 87.10 (CSEL 34.2:406–407; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/83-1/#p-87-10).

## Letter 88.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:407–408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholic clergy of Hippo complain to the Donatist primate Januarius of violence by Donatist clergy and Circumcellions, and recall that the Donatists first appealed to Constantine against Caecilian.

### Latin text

Clerici et Circumcelliones uestri noui generis et inauditae crudelitatis persecutione in nos saeuiunt. qui si malum pro malo redderent, etiam sic contra legem facerent Christi; nunc uero consideratis omnibus factis uestris et nostris inuenimur hoc pati, quod scriptum est: Retribuebant mihi mala pro bonis et in alio psalmo: Cum his, qui oderant pacem, eram pacificus; cum loquebar illis, debellabant me gratis. nam cum sis in tam grandi constitutus aetate, arbitramur te optime nosse, quod pars Donati, quae primo apud Carthaginem pars Maiorini dicebatur, ultro accusauit Caecilianum tunc episcopum ecclesiae Carthaginiensis apud imperatorem illum antiquum Constantinum. sed ne forte aut oblita hoc sit grauitas tua aut te nosse dissimules aut etiam, quod non putamus, forsitan nescias, exemplum relationis tunc Anulini proconsulis, quem pars Maiorini tunc interpellauit, ut ea crimina, quae obiciebat Caeciliano, ad memoratum imperatorem ab eodem proconsule mitterentur, his nostris litteris inseruimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Your clergy and Circumcellions are raging against us with a persecution of a new kind and unheard-of cruelty. If they were returning evil for evil, even so they would be acting against the law of Christ; but as it is, when all your deeds and ours are considered, we are found to be suffering what is written: ‘They repaid me evil for good’; and in another psalm: ‘With those who hated peace I was peaceable; when I spoke to them, they fought against me without cause.’ For since you are of so great an age, we think you know very well that the party of Donatus, which at first at Carthage was called the party of Majorinus, of its own accord accused Caecilian, then bishop of the church of Carthage, before the emperor Constantine of old. But lest your Gravity should perhaps have forgotten this, or pretend not to know it, or even, which we do not think, perhaps not know it, we have inserted in this letter of ours a copy of the report of the proconsul Anulinus at that time, whom the party of Majorinus then petitioned that the charges they brought against Caecilian should be sent by the same proconsul to the said emperor.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 35:12 (34:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 120:7 (119:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of the Catholic clergy of Hippo to Januarius, Donatist bishop of Casae Nigrae and primate of Numidia. Quotations of Ps 35:12 (LXX 34:12) and Ps 120:7 (LXX 119:7). Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.1 (CSEL 34.2:407–408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-1).

## Letter 88.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A copy of the proconsul Anulinus’s report to the emperors (313) forwarding the petition of the party of Majorinus against Caecilian.

### Latin text

A. GGG. NNN. ANULINUS VC. PRO CONSULE AFRICAE. Scripta caelestia maiestatis uestrae accepta atque adorata Caeciliano et his, qui sub eodem agunt quique clerici appellantur, deuotio mea apud acta paruitatis meae insinuare curauit eosdemque hortata est, ut unitate consensu omnium facta, cum omni omnino munere indulgentiae maiestatis uestrae liberati esse uideantur, catholicae custodita sanctitate legis debita reuerentia ac diuinis rebus inseruiant. uerum post paucos dies extiterunt quidam adunata secum populi multitudine, qui Caeciliano contradicendum putarent quique fasciculum in aluta signatum et libellum sine signo obtulerunt dicationi meae atque impendio postularunt, ut ad sacrum ac uenerabilem comitatum numinis uestri dirigerem, quae manente Caeciliano in statu suo subiectis eorundem actis, quo cuncta maiestas uestra possit dinoscere, paruitas mea dirigere curauit. transmissi libelli duo, unus in aluta suprascriptus ita: Libellus ecclesiae catholicae criminum Caeciliani traditus a parte Maiorini, item alius sine sigillo cohaerens eidem alutae, datus die XVII Kalendas Maias Carthagine domino nostro Constantino Augusto III.

### English translation (Claude)

To our three Augusti, Anulinus, a man of senatorial rank, proconsul of Africa. My devotion has taken care to communicate, in the records of my lowliness, the heavenly writings of your Majesty, received and adored, to Caecilian and to those who act under him and are called clergy, and has exhorted them that, unity having been established by the consent of all, since they are seen to be freed by the indulgence of your Majesty from every public duty whatever, they should, keeping the holiness of the Catholic law with due reverence, devote themselves to divine things. But after a few days there appeared certain persons, with a crowd of people gathered with them, who thought that Caecilian should be opposed, and who presented to my office a bundle sealed in leather and a petition without a seal, and earnestly demanded that I should send them to the sacred and venerable court of your Divinity. These my lowliness has taken care to send, Caecilian remaining in his position, with the records of the proceedings attached, so that your Majesty may be able to judge everything. Two petitions sent: one in leather, inscribed thus: ‘Petition of the Catholic Church concerning the crimes of Caecilian, delivered by the party of Majorinus’; and the other, without a seal, attached to the same leather. Given on the 17th day before the Kalends of May at Carthage, in the third consulship of our lord Constantine Augustus.

### Translation notes

- Official report of 15 April 313 inserted in the letter. ‘Three Augusti’ renders the abbreviation A. GGG. NNN. (Augustis nostris).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.2 (CSEL 34.2:408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-2).

## Letter 88.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:408–410
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy recount the condemnation of the Donatist cause at Rome, Arles, and by Constantine, and introduce Constantine’s letter on the acquittal of Felix of Aptunga.

### Latin text

Post hanc relationem ad se missam iussit imperator uenire partes ad episcopale iudicium in urbe Roma faciendum. ubi quem ad modum causa dicta atque finita sit et Caecilianus innocens iudicatus sit, indicant gesta ecclesiastica. iam utique post pacificum moderamen episcopalis iudicii omnis contentionis et animositatis pertinacia debebat extingui. sed rursus maiores uestri ad imperatorem redierunt. non recte iudicatum neque omnem causam auditam esse conquesti sunt. unde ille alterum episcopale iudicium dedit habendum in Arelatensi Galliae ciuitate, ubi multi uestri uana et diabolica dissensione damnata cum Caeciliano in concordiam redierunt, alii uero pertinacissimi et litigiosissimi ad eundem imperatorem appellauerunt. postea et ipse coactus episcopalem causam inter partes cognitam terminauit et primus contra uestram partem legem constituit, ut loca congregationum uestrarum fisco uindicarentur. quarum omnium rerum documenta si uellemus inserere, nimium longas litteras faceremus. illud tamen nullo modo praetermittendum est, quo modo Felicis Aptungensis, quem fontem omnium malorum in concilio Carthaginiensi ab Secundo Tigisitano primate habito patres uestri fuisse dixerunt, urgentibus apud imperatorem uestris publico iudicio causa discussa atque finita sit. nam memoratus imperator in hac ipsa causa uestros apud se accusatores et assiduos interpellatores litteris suis fuisse testatur, quarum exemplum infra scripsimus.

### English translation (Claude)

After this report was sent to him, the emperor ordered the parties to come to an episcopal court to be held in the city of Rome. How the case was argued and concluded there, and Caecilian judged innocent, the church records show. Surely after the peaceable control of an episcopal judgment all the obstinacy of contention and animosity ought to have been extinguished. But your forefathers went back to the emperor again and complained that the judgment was not right and that the whole case had not been heard. So he granted another episcopal court to be held in the Gallic city of Arles, where many of your party, having condemned the vain and diabolical dissension, returned to concord with Caecilian, while others, most obstinate and quarrelsome, appealed to the same emperor. Afterwards he himself, under compulsion, heard the bishops’ case between the parties and settled it, and he was the first to make a law against your party, that the places of your assemblies should be confiscated to the treasury. If we wished to insert the documents of all these things, we would make the letter far too long. But this must by no means be passed over: how the case of Felix of Aptunga, whom your fathers, at the council of Carthage held by Secundus of Tigisis, the primate, declared to be the source of all evils, was examined and concluded in a public court at the insistence of your people before the emperor. For the said emperor testifies in his letter that in this very case your people were his accusers and persistent petitioners before him; a copy of that letter we have written below.

### Translation notes

- Council of Rome (313), Council of Arles (314), Constantine’s judgment (316). Felix of Aptunga had consecrated Caecilian; the Donatists charged him with handing over the Scriptures. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.3 (CSEL 34.2:408–410; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-3).

## Letter 88.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:410–411
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A copy of Constantine’s letter to the proconsul Probianus reporting the acquittal of Felix of Aptunga and summoning the forger Ingentius to court.

### Latin text

IMPERATORES CAESARES FLAVII CONSTANTINUS MAXIMUS ET VALERIUS LICINIANUS LICINIUS AD PROBIANUM PROCONSULEM AFRICAE. Aelianus praedecessor tuus merito, dum uir perfectissimus Verus, uicarius praefectorum tunc per Africam nostram, incommoda ualitudine teneretur, eiusdem partibus functus inter cetera etiam id negotium uel inuidiam, quae de Caeciliano episcopo ecclesiae catholicae uidetur esse commota, ad examen suum atque iussionem credidit esse reuocandam. etenim cum iam Superium centurionem et Caecilianum magistratum Aptungitanorum et Saturninum excuratorem et Calibium iuniorem, eiusdem ciuitatis curatorem, atque Solum seruum publicum supra scriptae ciuitatis praesentes esse fecisset, audientiam praebuit competentem, adeo ut, cum Caeciliano fuisset obiectum, quod a Felice eidem episcopatus uideretur esse delatus, cui diuinarum scripturarum proditio atque exustio uideretur obiecta, innocentem de eo Felicem fuisse constiterit. denique cum Maximus Ingentium decurionem Ziquensium ciuitatis epistulam Caeciliani exduumuiri falsasse contenderet, eundem ipsum Ingentium suspensum actis, quae suberant, peruidimus et ideo minime tortum. quod se decurionem Ziquensium ciuitatis esse adseuerauerit. unde uolumus, ut eundem ipsum Ingentium sub idonea prosecutione ad comitatum meum Constantini Augusti mittas. ut illis, qui in praesentiarum agunt atque diurnis diebus interpellare non desinunt, audientibus et coram adsistentibus apparere et intimare possit frustra eos Caeciliano episcopo inuidiam comparare atque aduersus eum uiolenter insurgere noluisse. ita enim fiet, ut omissis, sicuti oportet, eius modi contentionibus populus sine dissensione aliqua religioni propriae cum debita ueneratione deseruiat.

### English translation (Claude)

The Emperors Caesars Flavius Constantine Maximus and Valerius Licinianus Licinius to Probianus, proconsul of Africa. Your predecessor Aelianus, while the most perfect Verus, vicar of the prefects then in our Africa, was held by ill health, acting in his place, rightly thought that among other things this business, or the odium which seems to have been stirred up concerning Caecilian, bishop of the Catholic Church, should be brought back to his own examination and decision. For when he had caused to be present Superius the centurion, Caecilian the magistrate of Aptunga, Saturninus the former curator, Calibius the younger, curator of the same city, and Solus, public slave of the aforesaid city, he gave a fitting hearing, so that, when it had been objected against Caecilian that he appeared to have been raised to the episcopate by Felix, against whom the betrayal and burning of the divine Scriptures appeared to be charged, it was established that Felix was innocent of this. Finally, when Maximus contended that Ingentius, a decurion of the city of Ziqua, had forged a letter of Caecilian the former duumvir, we saw from the records attached that the same Ingentius had been suspended for torture, but was not tortured, because he asserted that he was a decurion of the city of Ziqua. Therefore we wish you to send this same Ingentius under suitable escort to the court of me, Constantine Augustus, so that, in the hearing and presence of those who are now pleading and do not cease petitioning day after day, it may be shown and made known that they have in vain stirred up odium against Bishop Caecilian and wished to rise violently against him. For so it will come about that, such contentions being dropped, as they ought to be, the people may serve their own religion with due reverence and without any dissension.

### Translation notes

- Imperial letter of ca. 315 inserted in the letter. The printed text reads noluisse (‘did not wish’), which contradicts the sense; translated as ‘wished’ (uoluisse), uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.4 (CSEL 34.2:410–411; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-4).

## Letter 88.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:411–412
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy argue that the Donatists, who first appealed to the emperor, cannot complain of imperial laws against them, comparing Daniel’s accusers thrown to the lions.

### Latin text

Haec cum uideas ita se habere, quid est quod nobis de imperatorum iussionibus, quae contra uos constituuntur, inuidiam concitatis, cum hoc totum uos potius antea feceritis? si nihil debent in his causis imperatores iubere, si ad imperatores Christianos haec cura pertinere non debet, quis urguebat maiores uestros causam Caeciliani ad imperatorem per proconsulem mittere et episcopum, contra quem absentem iam sententias quoquo modo dixeratis, iterum apud imperatorem accusare, quo innocente pronuntiato ordinatori eius Felici alias apud eundem imperatorem calumnias machinari? et nunc quid aliud quam ipsius maioris Constantini iudicium contra uestram partem uiuit, quod maiores uestri elegerunt, quod assiduis interpellationibus extorserunt, quod episcopali iudicio praetulerunt? si displicent imperialia iudicia, qui primitus imperatores ad ea uobis excitanda coegerunt? sic enim modo contra catholicam clamatis in his, quae contra uos ab imperatoribus decernuntur, quem ad modum si uellent aduersus Danihelem clamare, qui liberato illo eisdem leonibus consumendi missi sunt, a quibus eum ipsi primitus consumi uoluerunt; scriptum est enim: Nihil interest inter minas regis et iram leonis. Danihelem calumniosi inimici in lacum leonum mitti coegerunt; uicit innocentia eius illorum malitiam; inlaesus inde leuatus est; ipsi illuc missi perierunt. similiter maiores uestri Caecilianum et eius societatem regiae irae consumendam obiecerunt, cuius innocentia liberata ab eisdem regibus eadem uos patimini, quae illos uestri pati uoluerunt, quoniam scriptum est: Qui parat proximo foueam, ipse incidet in eam.

### English translation (Claude)

Since you see that these things are so, why is it that you stir up odium against us over the emperors’ orders that are issued against you, when you rather did all this earlier? If emperors ought to order nothing in these matters, if this concern ought not to belong to Christian emperors, who urged your forefathers to send Caecilian’s case to the emperor through the proconsul, and to accuse again before the emperor a bishop against whom, in his absence, you had already pronounced sentence in some fashion, and, when he was declared innocent, to contrive other slanders against Felix, who ordained him, before the same emperor? And now what else is in force against your party but the judgment of Constantine the elder himself, which your forefathers chose, which they extorted by persistent petitions, which they preferred to the episcopal judgment? If imperial judgments displease you, who first forced the emperors to stir them up against you? For you now cry out against the Catholic Church over what is decreed against you by the emperors, just as if those men had wished to cry out against Daniel who, when he was set free, were sent to be devoured by the same lions by which they had first wished him to be devoured; for it is written, ‘There is no difference between the threats of a king and the wrath of a lion.’ Slanderous enemies forced Daniel to be sent into the lions’ den; his innocence overcame their malice; he was lifted out unharmed; they, sent in there, perished. In the same way your forefathers cast Caecilian and his fellowship to the king’s wrath to be devoured; since his innocence has been set free, you suffer at the hands of the same kings the very things your people wished them to suffer; for it is written, ‘He who prepares a pit for his neighbour will fall into it himself.’

### Scripture references

- Dan 6:16: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:24: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 19:12: quotation, medium confidence
- Prov 26:27: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 27:26 (Sirach): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Concerns imperial coercion; polemical, translated as written. Allusions to Dan 6:16–24; Prov 19:12 / 20:2 (Old Latin form); Prov 26:27 (cf. Sir 27:26).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.5 (CSEL 34.2:411–412; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-5).

## Letter 88.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:412–413
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy describe Donatist violence against Catholic bishops, clergy, and laity, including the abduction and humiliation of a presbyter, before the new imperial laws.

### Latin text

De nobis ergo quid queramini, non habes et tamen ecclesiae mansuetudo etiam ab his imperatorum iussionibus omnino conquieuerat, nisi uestri clerici et Circumcelliones per suas immanissimas inprobitates furiosasque uiolentias quietem nostram perturbantes atque uastantes haec in uos recoli et moueri coegissent. nam prius quam recentiores leges istae, de quibus modo querimini, uenissent in Africam, insidias in itineribus nostris episcopis tetenderunt, conclericos nostros plagis immanissimis quassauerunt, laicis quoque et plagas grauissimas inflixerunt et intulerunt eorum aedificiis incendia. presbyterum etiam quendam, quia propria et libera uoluntate unitatem nostrae communionis elegit, de domo sua raptum et pro arbitrio immaniter caesum, in gurgite etiam caenoso uolutatum, buda uestitum cum quibusdam dolendum, quibusdam ridendum in pompa sui facinoris ostentassent, abductum inde, quo uoluerunt, uix post dies XII dimiserunt. unde conuentus municipalibus gestis a nostro episcopo Proculianus, cum ab inquirenda causa dissimulassent et iterum continuo conuentus esset, nihil se dicturum amplius gestis expressit. et hodie illi, qui hoc fecerunt, presbyteri uestri sunt adhuc nos insuper territantes et, sicut potuerunt, persequentes.

### English translation (Claude)

You have, then, nothing to complain of against us; and yet the mildness of the church had altogether refrained even from these imperial orders, had not your clergy and Circumcellions, disturbing and devastating our peace by their most savage wickedness and furious violence, forced these things to be recalled and set in motion against you. For before these more recent laws, of which you now complain, came to Africa, they laid ambushes for our bishops on their journeys, battered our fellow clergy with most savage blows, inflicted very grievous blows on laymen too, and set fire to their buildings. A certain presbyter, also, because by his own free will he chose the unity of our communion, they dragged from his house, beat savagely at their pleasure, rolled in a muddy pool, dressed in a rush mat, and paraded in the pomp of their crime, a sight for some to grieve at and for others to laugh at; then they led him off where they wished and released him barely after twelve days. When Proculeianus was summoned about this by our bishop before the municipal records, he pretended to look into the case; and when he was summoned again at once, he declared in the records that he would say nothing more. And today those who did this are still your presbyters, terrorizing us besides and persecuting us as they can.

### Translation notes

- Proculeianus was the Donatist bishop of Hippo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.6 (CSEL 34.2:412–413; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-6).

## Letter 88.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:413–414
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy explain that Catholics sought a peaceful conference and leniency for Donatists, but Donatist violence, especially against the bishop of Bagai, led to the harsher imperial laws.

### Latin text

Nec tamen de his iniuriis et persecutionibus, quas ecclesia catholica in regione nostra tunc pertulit, imperatoribus questus est episcopus noster. sed facto concilio placuit, ut pacifice conueniremini, quo, si fieri posset, haberetis inter uos conlationem et errore sublato fraterna caritas pacis in uinculo laetaretur. et in ipsa conuentione quid Proculianus primo responderit, quod concilium facturi essetis et illic uisuri, quid respondere deberetis, deinde quid postea, cum propter suam promissionem denuo conuentus esset, actis expresserit recusans pacificam conlationem, ipsa gesta instruant grauitatem tuam. deinde cum uestrorum clericorum et Circumcellionum notissima omnibus non cessaret immanitas, dicta causa est cum Crispino iudicatus haereticus nec poena decem librarum auri, quae in haereticos ab imperatoribus fuerat constituta, per mansuetudinem catholicam feriri permissus est et tamen ad imperatores appellandum putauit. cuius appellationi quod ita responsum est, nonne uestrorum praecedens inprobitas et eadem ipsius appellatio extorsit, ut fieret? nec tamen etiam post ipsum rescriptum intercedentibus apud imperatorem nostris episcopis eadem auri condemnatione multatus est. ex consilio autem nostri episcopi legatos ad comitatum miserunt, qui impetrarent, ut non omnes episcopi et clerici partis uestrae ad eandem condemnationem X librarum auri, quae in omnes haereticos constituta est, tenerentur sed hi soli, in quorum locis aliquas a uestris uiolentias ecclesia catholica pateretur. sed sic cum legati Romam uenerunt, iam cicatrices episcopi catholici Bagaitani horrendae ac recentissimae imperatorem commouerant, ut leges tales mitterentur, quales et missae sunt. quibus in Africam uenientibus cum utique non ad malum sed ad bonum coepissetis urgueri. quid facere debebatis nisi et uos mittere ad episcopos nostros, ut, quo modo uos ipsi conuenerant, sic conuenirentur a uobis et potius conlatione ueritas appareret?

### English translation (Claude)

Yet our bishop did not complain to the emperors of these injuries and persecutions which the Catholic Church then suffered in our region. But a council was held and it was decided that you should be approached peaceably, so that, if possible, you might hold a conference among yourselves and, error being removed, brotherly love might rejoice in the bond of peace. And what Proculeianus answered at first in that meeting, that you would hold a council and see there what you ought to answer, and then what he declared in the records afterwards, when he was summoned again because of his promise, refusing a peaceful conference, the records themselves will inform your Gravity. Then, since the savagery of your clergy and Circumcellions, well known to all, did not cease, a case was brought, and Crispinus was judged a heretic; but through Catholic mildness he was not allowed to be struck with the penalty of ten pounds of gold which had been established by the emperors against heretics; and yet he thought fit to appeal to the emperors. As for the answer given to his appeal, was it not the previous wickedness of your people and his own appeal that extorted it? And yet even after that rescript he was not fined the same amount of gold, because our bishops interceded with the emperor. And on the advice of our bishop they sent envoys to the court to obtain that not all the bishops and clergy of your party should be held liable to the same fine of ten pounds of gold established against all heretics, but only those in whose localities the Catholic Church suffered some violence from your people. But when the envoys came to Rome, the horrible and very recent scars of the Catholic bishop of Bagai had already so moved the emperor that such laws were sent as were in fact sent. When these came to Africa, since you had begun to be pressed certainly not towards evil but towards good, what ought you to have done but also to send to our bishops, so that, as they had approached you, so they might be approached by you, and the truth might rather appear through conference?

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:3: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Crispinus was Donatist bishop of Calama. The bishop of Bagai was Maximianus, savagely beaten by Donatists (ca. 404). The laws are the edicts of unity of 405. Concerns coercion; translated as written. Allusion to Eph 4:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.7 (CSEL 34.2:413–414; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-7).

## Letter 88.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:414–415
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy describe Circumcellion attacks, including blinding with lime and vinegar, and contrast them with the Donatists’ claim to suffer persecution.

### Latin text

Non solum autem non fecistis, sed peiora mala nobis uestri nunc faciunt. non tantum nos fustibus quassant ferroque concidunt, uerum etiam in oculos extinguendos calcem mixto aceto incredibili excogitatione sceleris mittunt. domus nostras insuper compilantes arma sibi ingentia et terribilia fabricarunt, quibus armati per diuersa discurrunt comminantes atque anhelantes caedes, rapinas, incendia, caecitates. quibus rebus compulsi sumus tibi primitus conqueri, ut consideret grauitas tua, quam multi uestrum, immo uos omnes, qui uos pati dicitis persecutionem, sub ipsis quasi terribilibus imperatorum catholicorum legibus in possessionibus uestris et alienis securi sedeatis et nos a uestris tam inaudita mala patiamur. uos dicitis pati persecutionem et nos ab armatis uestris fustibus et ferro concidimur; uos dicitis pati persecutionem et nostrae domus ab armatis uestris compilando uastantur; uos dicitis pati persecutionem et nostri oculi ab armatis uestris calce et aceto extinguntur; insuper, etiam si quas mortes sibi ultro ingerunt, nobis uolunt esse inuidiosas, nobis gloriosas. quod nobis faciunt, sibi non inputant et, quod sibi faciunt, nobis inputant. uiuunt ut latrones, moriuntur ut Circumcelliones, honorantur ut martyres et tamen nec latrones aliquando audiuimus eos, quos depraedati sunt, excaecasse: occisos auferunt luci, non uiuis auferunt lucem.

### English translation (Claude)

But not only have you not done this, but your people are now doing worse evils to us. They not only batter us with clubs and cut us down with the sword, but even, by an incredible invention of crime, throw lime mixed with vinegar into our eyes to blind them. Plundering our houses besides, they have made themselves huge and terrible weapons, armed with which they run about in various directions, threatening and breathing out murder, robbery, arson, and blinding. Compelled by these things, we have complained first to you, so that your Gravity may consider how many of you, nay all of you who say you suffer persecution, sit securely on your own and others’ estates under these supposedly terrible laws of the Catholic emperors, while we suffer such unheard-of evils from your people. You say you suffer persecution, and we are cut down by your armed men with clubs and the sword; you say you suffer persecution, and our houses are plundered and laid waste by your armed men; you say you suffer persecution, and our eyes are put out by your armed men with lime and vinegar. Moreover, if they bring any deaths on themselves of their own accord, they want them to bring odium on us and glory to themselves. What they do to us they do not impute to themselves, and what they do to themselves they impute to us. They live as robbers, die as Circumcellions, are honoured as martyrs; and yet we have never heard that even robbers blinded those they had plundered: they take the slain away from the light, they do not take the light away from the living.

### Translation notes

- The ‘deaths they bring on themselves’ refers to Circumcellion suicides honoured as martyrdom. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.8 (CSEL 34.2:414–415; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-8).

## Letter 88.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:415–416
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy state that captured Donatists are treated gently, instructed, and either reconciled without rebaptism or released unharmed, though some Catholic laity act more harshly.

### Latin text

Nos interim si quando uestros tenemus, cum magna dilectione seruamus inlaesos, loquimur eis et legimus omnia, quibus error ipse conuincitur, qui fratres a fratribus separat; facimus, quod dominus per Esaiam prophetam praecepit dicens: Audite, qui pauetis, uerbum domini; dicite: Fratres nostri estis his, qui uos oderunt et qui uos execrantur, ut nomen domini honorificetur et appareat illis in iucunditate, ipsi autem erubescant. ac sic aliquos eorum considerantes euidentiam ueritatis et pulchritudinem pacis non baptismo, quem iam sicut regalem characterem tamquam desertores acceperant, sed fidei, quae illis defuit, et spiritus sancti caritati et Christi corpori sociamus. scriptum est enim: Fide mundans corda eorum itemque scriptum est: Caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum. si autem uel nimia duritia uel pudore non ferentes eorum insultationem, cum quibus contra nos tam multa falsa iactabant et tam multa mala excogitabant, uel magis timore, ne, qualia nobis ante faciebant, talia nobiscum iam patiantur, unitati Christi consentire noluerunt, sicut inlaesi retenti sunt, sic a nobis dimittuntur inlaesi. hoc, quantum possumus, monemus etiam laicos nostros, ut eos inlaesos teneant et nobis corripiendos instruendosque perducant. sed aliqui nos audiunt et, si possunt, faciunt; alii cum illis quem ad modum cum latronibus agunt, quia eos re uera tales patiuntur; aliqui ictus eorum suis corporibus imminentes feriendo repellunt, ne ab eis ante feriantur; aliqui adprehensos iudicibus offerunt nec nobis intercedentibus eis parcunt, dum ab eis pati mala immania pertimescunt. in quibus omnibus illi non deponunt facta latronum et honorem sibi exigunt martyrum.

### English translation (Claude)

We, meanwhile, if we ever catch any of yours, keep them unharmed with great love; we speak with them and read to them everything by which the error is refuted that separates brothers from brothers; we do what the Lord commanded through the prophet Isaiah, saying: ‘Hear the word of the Lord, you who tremble; say, You are our brothers, to those who hate you and curse you, that the name of the Lord may be honoured and may appear to them in joy, but they shall be ashamed.’ And so some of them, considering the evidence of the truth and the beauty of peace, we unite, not to baptism, which they had already received like the royal mark, as deserters, but to the faith which they lacked, to the love of the Holy Spirit, and to the body of Christ. For it is written, ‘Cleansing their hearts by faith’; and likewise it is written, ‘Love covers a multitude of sins.’ But if, through too great hardness, or through shame, not bearing the taunts of those with whom they used to spread so many falsehoods against us and devise so many evils, or rather through fear that they should now suffer with us such things as they used to do to us before, they have been unwilling to consent to the unity of Christ, then, as they were held unharmed, so they are released by us unharmed. As far as we can, we admonish our laity too to hold them unharmed and to bring them to us to be rebuked and instructed. But some hear us and, if they can, do so; others deal with them as with robbers, because in truth they suffer them as such; some ward off the blows threatening their bodies by striking, so as not to be struck first; some seize them and bring them before the judges and do not spare them even at our intercession, since they greatly fear suffering monstrous evils from them. In all of this those men do not lay aside the deeds of robbers, and they demand for themselves the honour of martyrs.

### Scripture references

- Isa 66:5: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation of Isa 66:5 (LXX form); Acts 15:9; 1 Pet 4:8. Baptism compared to the ‘royal mark’ (character) of soldiers. Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.9 (CSEL 34.2:415–416; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-9).

## Letter 88.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:416–417
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy ask Januarius to hold a peaceful conference with the Catholic bishops, so that error, not men, may be removed and the settled case shown to those who do not know it.

### Latin text

Hoc est ergo desiderium nostrum, quod tuae grauitati per has litteras et per fratres, quos misimus, allegamus: primum, si fieri potest, ut cum episcopis nostris pacifice conferatis, ut, in quibus fuerit inuentus, non homines sed error ipse tollatur; ut homines non puniantur, sed corrigantur; ut uos modo conueniatis, quia eorum conuentionem antea contempsistis. quanto melius enim hoc inter uos facitis. ut, quod egeritis, conscriptum et subscriptum imperatori mittatis, quam ut hoc apud terrenas potestates fiat, quae non possunt nisi iam datis contra uos legibus inseruire! uestri enim collegae, qui nauigauerant, apud praefectos dixerunt se audiri uenisse et nominauerunt sanctum patrem nostrum catholicum episcopum Valentinum, qui tunc in comitatu erat. dicentes cum illo se uelle audiri, quod eis non poterat iudex concedere, qui iam secundum leges, quae contra uos constitutae sunt, iudicabat; nec ille episcopus ita uenerat aut aliquod tale mandatum a suis episcopis acceperat. quanto ergo melius ipse imperator, qui non est eisdem legibus subditus et qui habet in potestate alias leges ferre, cum ei conlatio uestra fuerit recitata, de tota ipsa causa poterit iudicare, quamuis iam olim dicta fuerit terminata! sed ideo uos conferre uolumus, non ut causa iterum finiatur, sed ut eis, qui nesciunt, iam finita monstretur. quod si hoc facere nostri episcopi noluerint, quid inde perditis et non potius adquiritis. quia uoluntas uestra innotescit, ne diffidentia merito reprehendatur? an forte putatis non licere fieri, cum non uos lateat, quod dominus Christus etiam cum diabolo de lege locutus est, quod cum Paulo non solum Iudaei sed etiam de haeresi Stoicorum et Epicureorum philosophi gentium contulerunt? an forte istae leges imperatoris uos non permittunt nostros episcopos conuenire? ecce interim episcopos nostros, qui sunt in regione Hipponiensi, ubi a uestris tanta mala patimur, conuenite. quanto enim licentius et liberius ad nos per uestros uestra scripta quam eorum arma perueniunt!

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, is our desire, which we put before your Gravity by this letter and by the brothers whom we have sent: first, if possible, that you confer peaceably with our bishops, so that, wherever error is found, not men but the error itself may be removed; that men may not be punished but corrected; that you may now approach them, since you formerly despised their approach. How much better it is for you to do this among yourselves, so as to send the emperor a written and signed record of what you have done, than that it should happen before earthly powers, who cannot but serve the laws already given against you! For your colleagues who had sailed overseas said before the prefects that they had come to be heard, and named our holy father, the Catholic bishop Valentinus, who was then at court, saying they wished to be heard with him; which the judge could not grant them, since he was already judging according to the laws established against you; nor had that bishop come for that purpose or received any such commission from his bishops. How much better, then, could the emperor himself, who is not subject to those laws and has power to make other laws, judge the whole case when your conference has been read to him, although it was declared settled long ago! But we wish you to confer, not so that the case may be settled again, but so that it may be shown to those who do not know that it has been settled. If our bishops refuse to do this, what do you lose by it, and do you not rather gain, since your willingness becomes known, so that you are not rightly blamed for lack of confidence? Or perhaps you think it is not lawful to do this, though you know that the Lord Christ spoke about the law even with the devil, and that not only Jews but also philosophers of the Gentiles of the sect of the Stoics and Epicureans conferred with Paul? Or perhaps these laws of the emperor do not permit you to approach our bishops? See, approach meanwhile our bishops in the region of Hippo, where we suffer such great evils from your people. For how much more lawfully and freely may your writings reach us through your people than their weapons!

### Scripture references

- Matt 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 17:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions to Matt 4:1–11 and Acts 17:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.10 (CSEL 34.2:416–417; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-10).

## Letter 88.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:417–418
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy point out that the Donatists accepted without rebaptism those baptized by the condemned Maximianists, and themselves used judges to expel schismatics from basilicas.

### Latin text

Postremo per istos ipsos fratres nostros, quos ad uos misimus, talia rescribite. si autem et hoc non uultis, saltem cum uestris, a quibus talia patimur, nos audite. ostendite nobis ueritatem, pro qua uos pati dicitis persecutionem, cum patiamur nos uestrorum tantam crudelitatem. si enim nos esse in errore conuiceritis, forte concedetis nobis, ut non rebaptizemur a uobis, iustum existimantes, ut nobis hoc praestetis, qui baptizati sumus ab eis, quos nullo iudicio damnastis, quod praestitistis eis, quos Felicianus Mustitanus et Praetextatus Assuritanus per tam longum tempus baptizauerant, quando eos per iudicum iussa de basilicis pellere conabamini, quia Maximiano communicabant, cum quo a uobis in concilio Bagaitano expresse nominatimque damnati sunt. quae omnia gestis iudicialibus et municipalibus demonstramus, ubi et ipsum concilium uestrum allegastis, dum uultis iudicibus ostendere, quod schismaticos uestros de basilicis pelleretis. et tamen, qui ab ipso semine Abrahae, in quo omnes gentes benedicuntur, schisma fecistis, de basilicis pelli non uultis non per iudices, sicut schismaticis uestris uos fecistis, sed per ipsos reges terrae, qui completa prophetia Christum adorant, apud quos Caecilianum accusantes uicti recessistis.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, write back such things by these very brothers of ours whom we have sent to you. But if you do not want even this, at least hear us together with your people, from whom we suffer such things. Show us the truth for which you say you suffer persecution, when we suffer such cruelty from your people. For if you convince us that we are in error, perhaps you will grant us not to be rebaptized by you, thinking it just to give us, who were baptized by men whom you condemned by no judgment, what you gave to those whom Felicianus of Musti and Praetextatus of Assuras had baptized over so long a time, when you were trying to drive them out of the basilicas by order of the judges because they communicated with Maximianus, with whom they had been expressly and by name condemned by you at the council of Bagai. All this we demonstrate by judicial and municipal records, in which you also cited that council of yours, when you wished to show the judges that you were driving your schismatics out of the basilicas. And yet you who have made a schism from the very seed of Abraham, in which all nations are blessed, do not wish to be driven out of the basilicas, not by judges, as you did to your schismatics, but by the very kings of the earth, who, in fulfilment of prophecy, worship Christ, before whom you accused Caecilian and went away defeated.

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Donatist council of Bagai (394) condemned Maximianus and his ordainers, including Felicianus and Praetextatus, who were later received back. Allusions to Gen 22:18; Ps 72:11 (LXX 71:11). Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.11 (CSEL 34.2:417–418; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-11).

## Letter 88.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:418–419
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Hippo clergy ask Januarius at least to restrain the Donatist bands, and warn that God will vindicate his Church.

### Latin text

Si autem nec audire nec docere nos uultis, uenite aut mittite nobiscum in regionem Hipponiensium, qui uideant armatum exercitum uestrum, quamuis nullus miles numero armorum suorum calcem et acetum addidit ad oculos barbarorum. si neque hoc uultis, saltem scribite ad illos, ut iam ista non faciant, ut iam se a caedibus nostris, a rapinis, ab excaecatione compescant. nolumus dicere: Damnate illos; uos enim uideritis, quo modo uos non inquinent, quos modo ostendimus in uestra communione latrones, et nos inquinent. quos numquam potuistis ostendere traditores. ex his omnibus eligite, quod uolueritis. si autem querelas nostras contempseritis, nos minime paenitebit ordine pacifico agere uoluisse. aderit dominus ecclesiae suae, ut uos potius humilitatem nostram contempsisse paeniteat.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you will neither hear nor teach us, come, or send people, with us into the region of Hippo, to see your armed army; although no soldier has ever added lime and vinegar for the eyes of barbarians to the number of his weapons. If you do not want even this, at least write to them that they stop doing these things now, that they now restrain themselves from murdering, robbing, and blinding us. We do not wish to say, ‘Condemn them’; for you must see how it is that those whom we now show to be robbers in your communion do not defile you, while those whom you could never show to be traitors defile us. Choose from all these whatever you will. But if you despise our complaints, we shall not at all regret having wished to act in a peaceable order. The Lord will help his church, so that you rather may regret having despised our humility.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 88.12 (CSEL 34.2:418–419; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-88-12).

## Letter 89.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:419
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the official Festus that Catholics must labour as tirelessly for unity as the Donatists do for their error.

### Latin text

Si pro errore homines et damnabili dissensione et conuicta modis omnibus falsitate tanta praesumunt, ut eorum salutem requirenti catholicae ecclesiae tam audaciter insidiari minarique non cessent, quanto magis aequum est et oportet eos, qui pacis et unitatis Christianae adserunt ueritatem omnibus etiam dissimulantibus et cohibentibus manifestam, satagere instanter atque inpigre non solum pro eorum munimine, qui iam catholici sunt, uerum etiam pro eorum correctione, qui nondum sunt! nam si pertinacia insuperabiles uires habere conatur, quantas decet habere constantiam, quae in eo bono, quod perseueranter atque infatigabiliter agit, et deo se placere nouit et procul dubio non potest hominibus prudentibus displicere!

### English translation (Claude)

If men, for the sake of error, and of a damnable dissension, and of a falsehood refuted in every way, presume so much that they do not cease to lay ambushes and make threats so boldly against the Catholic Church, which seeks their salvation, how much more just and fitting is it that those who maintain the truth of Christian peace and unity, which is plain to all even who pretend otherwise and suppress it, should take pains urgently and tirelessly, not only for the protection of those who are already Catholics, but also for the correction of those who are not yet! For if obstinacy tries to have invincible strength, how great a constancy ought that to have which, in the good it does perseveringly and tirelessly, knows that it pleases God and certainly cannot displease prudent men!

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Festus, an imperial official with estates in the region of Hippo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.1 (CSEL 34.2:419; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-1).

## Letter 89.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:419–420
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Donatists are not martyrs, since the cause, not the punishment, makes a martyr, and that their violence makes them the real persecutors.

### Latin text

Quid autem infelicius atque peruersius, sicut Donatistae faciunt, qui se persecutionem perpeti gloriantur, quam de cohercitione iniquitatis suae non solum nescire confundi, sed etiam uelle laudari ignorantes caecitate mirabili uel animositate damnabili se scire dissimulantes, quod martyres ueros non faciat poena sed causa? et hoc quidem aduersus eos dicerem, quos sola caligo haeretici erroris inuolueret, pro quo sacrilegio poenas dignissimas luerent, nec tamen ulla quemquam uiolenta insania laedere auderent. aduersus istos autem quid dicam, quorum tam perniciosa peruersitas uel damnorum terrore cohercetur uel docetur exilio, quam ubique diffusa sit ecclesia, sicut futura praedicta est, quam malunt oppugnare quam agnoscere? et si ea, quae per misericordissimam disciplinam patiuntur, comparentur eis factis, quae furiosa temeritate committunt, quis non uideat, qui magis persecutores uocandi sunt? quamquam filii mali eo tantum, quo perdite uiuunt, etiam si nullas uiolenter inferant manus, parentum pietatem grauius persequuntur, quam cum illos pater aut mater, quanto amplius diligunt, tanto amplius ad bonam uitam sine ulla dissimulatione compellunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But what is more unhappy and perverse than what the Donatists do, who boast that they suffer persecution, not only not to know how to be ashamed of the restraint of their iniquity, but even to wish to be praised for it, not knowing, through amazing blindness, or pretending not to know, through damnable animosity, that it is not the punishment but the cause that makes true martyrs? And this indeed I would say against those who were wrapped only in the darkness of heretical error, for which sacrilege they would pay a most deserved penalty, though they dared not harm anyone with any violent madness. But what shall I say against these, whose so pernicious perversity is either restrained by the fear of losses or taught by exile how widely spread everywhere is the church, as it was foretold that it would be, which they prefer to attack rather than acknowledge? And if what they suffer through most merciful discipline is compared with the deeds they commit with furious rashness, who does not see which ought rather to be called persecutors? Although bad sons, merely by living dissolutely, even if they lay no violent hands on them, persecute the devotion of their parents more grievously than when a father or mother, the more they love them, the more they press them without any pretence towards a good life.

### Translation notes

- The maxim ‘not the punishment but the cause makes the martyr’ recurs in Augustine. Concerns coercion; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.2 (CSEL 34.2:419–420; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-2).

## Letter 89.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:420–421
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that the Donatists themselves first appealed to Constantine against Caecilian, were defeated at every stage, and now call the consequences persecution.

### Latin text

Extant publicorum monumentorum firmissima documenta, quae potes legere, si uolueris, immo peto et hortor, ut legas. quibus probatur, quod maiores eorum, qui primi se ab ecclesiae pace diuiserunt, ultro per Anulinum tunc proconsulem apud Constantinum imperatorem accusare ausi sunt Caecilianum. in quo utique iudicio si uicissent, quid erat Caecilianus ab imperatore passurus, nisi quod in istos, posteaquam uicti sunt, pronuntiauit? sed uidelicet si eis accusantibus atque superantibus Caecilianus eiusque collegae pellerentur sedibus, quas tenebant, uel etiam in sua conspiratione durantes grauius punirentur — neque enim poterat uictos et resistentes regia censura contemnere —, tunc isti prouisionem suam et pro ecclesia sollicitam curam praedicandam laudibus uentilarent. nunc autem quia ipsi superati sunt, qui ea, quae intendebant, probare minime potuerunt, si quid pro sua iniquitate patiuntur, persecutionem uocant; nec tantum furorem perditum minime reprimunt, uerum etiam honorem martyrum quaerunt, quasi uero Christiani catholici imperatores aduersus eorum pertinacissimam iniquitatem aliud sequantur quam Constantini iudicium, apud quem ultro Caeciliani accusatores fuerunt, cuius auctoritatem omnibus transmarinis episcopis praetulerunt, ut non ad illos sed ad illum ecclesiae causam deferrent, ut ab eo datum in urbe Roma episcopale iudicium, in quo primum uicti sunt, rursus apud illum accusarent, ut ab altero ad Arelatum dato episcopali iudicio ad illum appellarent, apud quem tamen nouissime superati in sua peruersitate manserunt. puto, quod ipse diabolus, si auctoritate iudicis, quem ultro elegerat, totiens uinceretur, non esset tam inpudens, ut in ea causa persisteret.

### English translation (Claude)

There exist most reliable documents in the public records, which you can read if you will; indeed I ask and urge you to read them. By them it is proved that the forefathers of these men, who first divided themselves from the peace of the church, of their own accord dared to accuse Caecilian before the emperor Constantine through Anulinus, then proconsul. If they had won in that trial, what would Caecilian have suffered from the emperor but what he pronounced against them after they were defeated? But no doubt, if, on their accusation and victory, Caecilian and his colleagues had been driven from the sees they held, or even more severely punished for persisting in their conspiracy (for the royal authority could not disregard the defeated and resisting), then these men would be trumpeting their foresight and their anxious care for the church as worthy of praise. But now, because they themselves were defeated, being quite unable to prove what they alleged, if they suffer anything for their iniquity they call it persecution; and they not only fail to restrain their abandoned fury but even seek the honour of martyrs; as if the Catholic Christian emperors, against their most obstinate iniquity, were following anything other than the judgment of Constantine, before whom they were the accusers of Caecilian of their own accord, whose authority they preferred to all the bishops overseas, so that they referred the church’s case not to them but to him; so that, after the episcopal court which he granted in the city of Rome, in which they were first defeated, they accused again before him; so that from the second episcopal court, granted at Arles, they appealed to him; before whom, defeated at last, they nevertheless remained in their perversity. I think that the devil himself, if he were defeated so many times by the authority of a judge he had chosen of his own accord, would not be so shameless as to persist in that case.

### Translation notes

- Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.3 (CSEL 34.2:420–421; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-3).

## Letter 89.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:421–422
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the worldwide Church cannot be condemned for crimes it could not know, and that the same Scriptures that foretell Christ foretell the universal Church.

### Latin text

Sed haec humana iudicia deputentur et circumueniri ac falli uel etiam corrumpi potuisse dicantur. cur ergo adhuc accusatur Christianus orbis terrarum et nescio quibus traditorum criminibus infamatur, qui utique nec potuit nec debuit nisi electis iudicibus potius quam uictis litigatoribus credere? habent apud deum illi iudices causam suam siue bonam siue malam; quid fecit ecclesia toto orbe diffusa, quae non ob aliud ab istis rebaptizanda censetur, nisi quia in ea causa, in qua, quid ueri esset, iudicare non potuit, eis potius, qui iudicare potuerunt, quam eis, qui nec superati cesserunt, credendum putauit? o magnum crimen omnium gentium, quas in semine Abrahae benedicendas promisit deus et, sicut promisit, exhibuit! quae cum uoce una dixerunt: Quare nos uultis rebaptizare, respondetur eis: Quia nescitis, qui fuerint in Africa sanctorum codicum traditores, et in eo, quod nesciebatis, iudicibus magis quam accusatoribus credere uoluistis. si crimen alienum non grauat quemquam, quid pertinet ad orbem terrarum, quod in Africa quisque commisit? si crimen incognitum non grauat quemquam, unde potuit orbis terrarum cognoscere uel crimen iudicum uel reorum? iudicate, qui cor habetis. haec est haeretica iustitia, ut, quia orbis terrarum non damnat crimen incognitum, pars Donati damnet orbem terrarum inauditum? sed sane sufficit orbi terrarum tenere promissiones dei et in se uidere compleri, quod prophetae tanto ante cecinerunt, in eisdem scripturis agnoscere ecclesiam, ubi et rex eius Christus agnoscitur. ubi enim de Christo talia praedicta sunt, qualia completa in euangelio legimus, illic praedicta sunt de ecclesia, qualia compleri toto orbe iam cernimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But let these be counted human judgments, and let it be said that they could have been circumvented and deceived or even corrupted. Why then is the Christian world still accused and defamed with some crimes or other of traitors, when it certainly neither could nor should believe anyone but the chosen judges rather than the defeated litigants? Those judges have their case before God, whether good or bad; what has the church spread throughout the world done, that it is judged by these men to need rebaptizing, for no other reason than that, in a case in which it could not judge what was true, it thought those who could judge were to be believed rather than those who did not yield even when defeated? O great crime of all the nations, which God promised would be blessed in the seed of Abraham, and, as he promised, has shown! When they say with one voice, ‘Why do you want to rebaptize us?’ the answer given them is, ‘Because you do not know who were the traitors of the holy books in Africa, and in what you did not know you chose to believe the judges rather than the accusers.’ If another’s crime burdens no one, what has the whole world to do with what anyone committed in Africa? If an unknown crime burdens no one, how could the whole world know the crime either of the judges or of the accused? Judge, you who have a heart. Is this heretical justice, that, because the whole world does not condemn an unknown crime, the party of Donatus condemns the whole world unheard? But truly it is enough for the whole world to hold the promises of God and see fulfilled in itself what the prophets sang so long before, to recognize the church in the same Scriptures in which its king, Christ, is also recognized. For where such things were foretold of Christ as we read fulfilled in the Gospel, there such things were foretold of the church as we now see fulfilled throughout the world.

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Gen 22:18. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.4 (CSEL 34.2:421–422; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-4).

## Letter 89.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:422–423
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues against the Donatist view that baptism depends on the minister’s righteousness: it is Christ who baptizes, whoever the minister.

### Latin text

Nisi forte quemquam prudentium permouebit, quod de baptismo solent dicere, tunc esse uerum baptismum Christi. cum ab homine iusto datur, cum et hinc teneat orbis terrarum euidentissimam et euangelicam ueritatem, ubi Iohannes ait: Qui me misit baptizare in aqua, ipse mihi dixit: Super quem uideris spiritum descendentem quasi columbam et manentem super eum, ipse est. qui baptizat in spiritu sancto. unde secura ecclesia spem non ponit in homine, ne incidat in illam sententiam, in qua scriptum est: Maledictus omnis, qui spem suam ponit in homine, sed spem suam ponit in Christo, qui sic accepit formam serui; ut non amitteret formam dei. de quo dictum est: Ipse est, qui baptizat. proinde homo quilibet minister baptismi eius qualemcumque sarcinam portet, non iste sed, super quem columba descendit, ipse est; qui baptizat. illos autem uana sentientes tanta absurditas sequitur, ut, quo ab ea fugiant, non inueniant. cum enim fateantur ratum et uerum esse baptismum, quando baptizat apud eos aliquis criminosus, cuius crimina latent, dicimus eis: Quis tunc baptizat? nec habent, quid respondeant, nisi: Deus, neque enim possunt dicere, quod homo adulter quemquam sanctificat. quibus respondemus: Si ergo, cum baptizat homo iustus manifestus, ipse sanctificat, cum autem baptizat homo iniquus occultus, tunc non ipse sed deus sanctificat, optare debent, qui baptizantur, ab occultis malis hominibus potius baptizari quam a manifestis bonis; multum enim eos melius deus quam quilibet homo iustus sanctificat. quod si absurdum est, ut quisque baptizandus optet ab occulto adultero potius baptizari quam a manifesto casto, restat utique, ut, quilibet ministrorum hominum accesserit, ideo ratus sit baptismus, quia, super quem columba descendit, ipse baptizat.

### English translation (Claude)

Unless perhaps any sensible person will be moved by what they are accustomed to say about baptism, that the baptism of Christ is true when it is given by a righteous man; since on this point too the whole world holds the most evident gospel truth, where John says: ‘He who sent me to baptize with water said to me, He on whom you see the Spirit descending like a dove and remaining on him, he it is who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.’ Hence the church, secure, does not place its hope in man, lest it fall under that sentence in which it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who places his hope in man,’ but places its hope in Christ, who so took the form of a servant that he did not lose the form of God, of whom it was said, ‘He it is who baptizes.’ Accordingly, whatever man is the minister of his baptism, whatever burden he bears, it is not he but he on whom the dove descended who baptizes. But such absurdity follows those who hold empty views that they cannot find where to flee from it. For since they admit that baptism is valid and true when some criminal among them, whose crimes are hidden, baptizes, we say to them, ‘Who baptizes then?’ And they have nothing to answer but ‘God’; for they cannot say that an adulterous man sanctifies anyone. We answer them: If, then, when a manifestly righteous man baptizes, he himself sanctifies, but when a secretly wicked man baptizes, then not he but God sanctifies, those who are baptized ought to wish to be baptized by secretly wicked men rather than by manifestly good ones; for God sanctifies them much better than any righteous man. But if it is absurd that anyone to be baptized should wish to be baptized by a secret adulterer rather than by a manifestly chaste man, it certainly remains that, whatever human minister comes, baptism is valid because he on whom the dove descended himself baptizes.

### Scripture references

- John 1:33: quotation, high confidence
- Jer 17:5: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- A key statement of Augustine’s doctrine of baptism; translated as written. Quotations: John 1:33; Jer 17:5; allusion to Phil 2:6–7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.5 (CSEL 34.2:422–423; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-5).

## Letter 89.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:423–424
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the Church to a physician who must restrain the frenzied and rouse the lethargic, troubling both out of love.

### Latin text

Et tamen cum tam perspicua ueritas aures et corda hominum feriat, tanta quosdam malae consuetudinis uorago submersit, ut omnibus auctoritatibus rationibusque resistere quam consentire malint. resistunt autem duobus modis: aut saeuiendo aut pigrescendo. quid igitur hic faciat ecclesiae medicina salutem omnium materna caritate conquirens tamquam inter phreneticos et lethargicos aestuans? numquid contemnere, numquid desistere uel debet uel potest? utrisque sit necesse est molesta, quia neutris est inimica. nam et phrenetici nolunt ligari et lethargici nolunt excitari; sed perseuerat diligentia caritatis phreneticum castigare, lethargicum stimulare, ambos amare. ambo offenduntur, sed ambo diliguntur; ambo molestati, quam diu aegri sunt, indignantur. sed ambo sanati gratulantur.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet, though so plain a truth strikes the ears and hearts of men, the whirlpool of bad habit has so swallowed up some that they would rather resist all authorities and reasons than agree. They resist in two ways: either by raging or by growing sluggish. What, then, is the church’s medicine to do here, seeking the salvation of all with motherly love, anxious as among the frenzied and the lethargic? Ought it, or can it, despise them or give up? It must needs be troublesome to both, because it is hostile to neither. For the frenzied do not want to be bound, and the lethargic do not want to be roused; but the diligence of love perseveres in restraining the frenzied, stimulating the lethargic, loving both. Both are offended, but both are loved; both, while troubled, are indignant as long as they are sick; but both, when healed, give thanks.

### Translation notes

- Concerns coercion of the Donatists; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.6 (CSEL 34.2:423–424; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-6).

## Letter 89.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:424
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that converted Donatists keep their sacraments but abandon their error, and that some who came over from fear proved better than old Catholics.

### Latin text

Denique non, sicut putant et sicut iactant, tales eos suscipimus, quales fuerunt, sed omnino mutatos, quia esse catholici non incipiunt, nisi haeretici esse destiterint. neque enim sacramenta eorum nobis inimica sunt, quae in illis sunt nobis communia, quia non humana sunt sed diuina. proprius eorum error auferendus est, quem male inbiberunt, non sacramenta, quae similiter acceperunt, quae ad poenam suam portant et habent, quanto indignius habent, sed tamen habent. errore itaque derelicto, separationis prauitate correcta ab haeresi ad ecclesiae pacem transeunt, quam non habebant. sine qua illis perniciosum fuerat, quod habebant. sed si, cum transeunt, ficti sunt, non est iam hoc nostrum sed dei iudicium; et tamen quidam cum ficti putarentur, quoniam iussionis ad nos terrore transierunt, tales posterius in nonnullis temptationibus inuenti sunt, ut quibusdam ueteribus catholicis praeferrentur. non ergo nihil agitur, cum instanter agitur: neque enim solis humanis terroribus murus durae consuetudinis expugnatur, sed etiam diuinis auctoritatibus atque rationibus fides et intellegentia mentis instruitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, we do not receive them, as they think and boast, such as they were, but wholly changed, because they do not begin to be Catholics unless they have ceased to be heretics. For their sacraments are not hostile to us, since in them they are common to us, because they are not human but divine. What must be taken away is their own error, which they wrongly imbibed, not the sacraments, which they received alike, and which they carry and have to their own punishment, the more unworthily they have them; but still they have them. So, having abandoned error and corrected the perversity of separation, they pass from heresy to the peace of the church, which they did not have, and without which what they had was harmful to them. But if they are insincere when they pass over, this is no longer our judgment but God’s. And yet some, though they were thought insincere because they came over to us out of fear of the imperial order, were afterwards found in some temptations to be such that they were preferred to some old Catholics. So it is not for nothing that one acts urgently; for the wall of hard habit is not stormed by human terrors alone, but the faith and understanding of the mind are also instructed by divine authorities and reasons.

### Translation notes

- Concerns coercion; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.7 (CSEL 34.2:424; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-7).

## Letter 89.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:424–426
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Festus to send a trusted agent to help win over the Donatist tenants on his estates near Hippo.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, nouerit benignitas tua homines uestros. qui in regione Hipponiensi sunt, adhuc esse Donatistas nec apud eos quicquam ualuisse litteras tuas. cur autem non ualuerint, non opus est scribere; sed mitte aliquem tuorum uel domesticorum uel amicorum, cuius hoc fidei possis iniungere, qui non ad ea loca sed ad nos primitus ueniat illis omnino nescientibus et nobiscum primitus consilio pertractato, quod agendum domino adiuuante uisum fuerit, agat. neque enim tantum pro eis agimus, cum hoc agimus, sed etiam pro nostris iam factis catholicis, quibus illorum uicinitas sic infesta est, ut contemni a nobis nullo modo possit. et hoc quidem breuiter scribere poteram; sed uolui te habere aliquid litterarum nostrarum, quo rationem curae meae non solum ipse cognosceres, sed etiam cuicumque dissuadenti, ne tuorum correctioni operam instanter inpendas, nobisque detrahenti, quod talia uelimus, habeas, quod respondeas. quod si superfluo feci, quod iam ista uel didiceras uel ipse cogitaueras, aut onerosus fui, quod curis publicis tam occupato prolixam epistulam ingessi, peto des ueniam, dum tamen, quod suggessi et rogaui, non spernas. sic te tueatur misericordia dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Since these things are so, your Kindness knows that your people who are in the region of Hippo are still Donatists, and that your letter has had no effect on them. Why it has had no effect there is no need to write; but send someone of yours, either of your household or of your friends, to whose good faith you can entrust this, who will come not to those places but first to us, without their knowing anything at all, and, having first taken counsel with us, will do what seems best to be done with the Lord’s help. For when we do this we act not only for them but also for our people who have already become Catholics, to whom their neighbourhood is so dangerous that we can in no way disregard it. And I could have written this briefly; but I wanted you to have something of our letters, by which you might not only know the reason for my concern yourself, but also have something to answer anyone who dissuades you from urgently devoting effort to the correction of your people, and disparages us for wishing such things. But if I have done this superfluously, because you had already learned or thought of these things yourself, or have been burdensome, because I have pressed a long letter on one so occupied with public cares, I ask you to forgive me, provided you do not despise what I have suggested and asked. So may the mercy of God protect you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 89.8 (CSEL 34.2:424–426; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-89-8).

## Letter 90.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-90-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:426–427
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius, a pagan citizen of Calama, appeals to Augustine to spare his city punishment for its people’s offence, citing a bishop’s duty to obtain pardon.

### Latin text

Quanta sit caritas patriae, quoniam nosti, praetereo. sola est enim, quae parentum iure uincat affectum. cui si ullus esset consulendi modus aut finis bonis, digne iam ab eius muneribus meruimus excusari. sed quoniam crescit in dies singulos dilectus et gratia ciuitatis, quantumque aetas fini proxima est, tantum incolumem ac florentem relinquere patriam cupit, idcirco gaudeo primum, quod apud instructum disciplinis omnibus uirum mihi hic sermo est institutus. in Calamensi colonia multa sunt, quae merito diligamus, uel quod in ea geniti sumus uel quod eidem magna contulisse uidemur officia. haec ergo, domine praestantissime et merito suscipiende, non leui populi sui errato prolapsa est. quod quidem si iuris publici rigore metiamur, debet plecti seueriore censura. sed episcopum fas non est nisi salutem hominibus impertire et pro statu meliore causis adesse et apud omnipotentem deum ueniam aliorum mereri delictis. quam ob rem quanta possum supplicatione deposco, ut, si defendenda res est, innoxius defendatur, ab innocentibus molestia separetur. praesta hoc, quod secundum naturam tuam peruides postulari. de damnis facilis potest haberi taxatio; tantum supplicia deprecamur. acceptior deo uiuas, domine insignis et merito suscipiende frater.

### English translation (Claude)

How great is the love of one’s country, since you know it, I pass over. For it alone surpasses by right the affection of parents. If there were any measure or limit to the good man’s care for it, I would by now deservedly have earned release from its duties. But since love and goodwill toward the city grow day by day, and the nearer age is to its end, the more it desires to leave its country safe and flourishing, I rejoice, first, that this discourse of mine is addressed to a man instructed in all learning. In the colony of Calama there are many things that we rightly love, either because we were born there or because we seem to have rendered it great services. This town, then, most excellent lord, deservedly to be revered, has fallen through no light offence of its people. If indeed we measure it by the rigour of public law, it ought to be punished with a severer sentence. But it is not right for a bishop to do anything but bestow salvation on men, to stand by causes for the better state of things, and to obtain from almighty God pardon for the faults of others. Therefore I ask with all the supplication I can that, if the matter is to be defended, the harmless be defended and trouble be kept from the innocent. Grant this, which you see, in accordance with your nature, is being asked. An assessment of damages can easily be made; we only beg that there be no punishments. May you live more acceptable to God, distinguished lord and brother, deservedly to be revered.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Rep. (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Nectarius to Augustine (408), after a pagan riot at Calama. ‘There is no measure or limit to the good man’s care for his country’ echoes Cicero, De re publica (cf. Ep. 91.3).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 90.1 (CSEL 34.2:426–427; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/88-1/#p-90-1).

## Letter 91.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:427–428
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Nectarius’s patriotism and invites him to become a citizen of the heavenly country.

### Latin text

Iam senio frigescentibus membris feruere animum tuum patriae caritate nec miror et laudo teque non tantum tenere memoriter uerum etiam uita ac moribus demonstrare, quod nullus sit patriae consulendi modus aut finis bonis, non inuitus, immo etiam libens accipio. unde supernae cuiusdam patriae, in cuius sancto amore pro nostro modulo inter eos, quibus ad illam capessendam consulimus, periclitamur atque laboramus, talem etiam te ipsum ciuem habere uellemus, ut eius portiunculae in hac terra peregrinanti nullum consulendi modum finemque censeres tanto effectus melior, quanto meliori ciuitati officia debita praerogares in eius aeterna pace nullum gaudendi finem inuenturus, cuius ad tempus laboribus nullum tibi finem statueris consulendi.

### English translation (Claude)

That your mind, while your limbs are already growing cold with age, glows with love of your country, I do not wonder, and I praise it; and that you not only remember but show by your life and conduct that ‘there is no measure or limit to the good man’s care for his country,’ I accept not unwillingly, nay even gladly. Hence we would wish to have you too as a citizen of a certain heavenly country, in whose holy love, according to our small measure, we face danger and labour among those whom we counsel to win it; so that you would think there is no measure or limit to care for its little portion that is a pilgrim on this earth, becoming the better, the better the city to which you paid your due services, destined to find no end of rejoicing in its eternal peace, if for a time you set no end to your care for its labours.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Rep. (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Reply to Nectarius (Ep. 90). Augustine quotes the Ciceronian phrase from Nectarius’s letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.1 (CSEL 34.2:427–428; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-1).

## Letter 91.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:428
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Calama will not truly ‘flourish’ if the arson and violence of its pagans go unpunished.

### Latin text

Verum hoc donec fiat — neque enim desperandum est illam te patriam posse adquirere uel iam adquirendam prudentissime cogitare, ad quam te pater etiam, qui in ista genuit, antecessit — hoc ergo donec fiat, da nobis ueniam, si propter patriam nostram, quam cupimus numquam relinquere, contristamus patriam tuam, quam cupis florentem relinquere. de cuius quidem floribus si cum tua prudentia disputemus, non est uerendum, ne tibi difficile persuadeatur aut uero etiam non facile occurrat, quem ad modum florere ciuitas debeat. commemorauit poeta ille uestrarum clarissimus litterarum quosdam flores Italiae; sed nos in uestra patria non tam experti sumus, quibus floruit terra illa uiris, quam quibus arserit armis, immo uero non armis sed flammis nec arserit, sed incenderit. quod tantum scelus si fuerit inpunitum nulla digna correctione prauorum, florentem te patriam putas relicturum? o flores non plane fructuum sed spinarum! compara nunc, utrum malis florere patriam tuam pietate an impunitate, correctis moribus an securis ausibus; compara ista et uide, utrum in patriae tuae amore nos uincas, utrum eam magis ueriusque cupias florere quam nos.

### English translation (Claude)

But until this happens (for we must not despair that you can gain that country, or are already most prudently considering how to gain it, where your father too, who begot you in this one, has gone before you), until this happens, then, forgive us if, for the sake of our country, which we desire never to leave, we sadden your country, which you desire to leave flourishing. If we were to discuss its flowers with your Prudence, there is no fear that you would be hard to persuade, or rather that it would not easily occur to you, how a city ought to flourish. That most famous poet of your literature recalled certain flowers of Italy; but in your country we have experienced not so much ‘with what men that land flourished’ as ‘with what arms it burned’; nay rather, not with arms but with flames, and it did not burn but set on fire. If so great a crime goes unpunished, with no fitting correction of the wicked, do you think you will leave your country flourishing? O flowers, plainly not of fruits but of thorns! Compare now whether you would rather your country flourished in piety or in impunity, in corrected morals or in secure audacity; compare these and see whether you surpass us in love of your country, whether you desire it to flourish more and more truly than we do.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 7.643–644 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The poet is Virgil, Aeneid 7.643–644 (‘with what men the land of Italy flourished, with what arms it burned’).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.2 (CSEL 34.2:428; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-2).

## Letter 91.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:428–429
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points Nectarius to Cicero’s On the Republic, whose praise of virtue is truly taught in the churches, and argues that imitating the pagan gods corrupts morals.

### Latin text

Intuere paululum ipsos de re publica libros, unde illum affectum amantissimi ciuis ebibisti, quod nullus sit patriae consulendi modus aut finis bonis. intuere, obsecro te, et cerne, quantis ibi laudibus frugalitas et continentia praedicetur et erga coniugale uinculum fides castique honesti ac probi mores, quibus cum praepollet ciuitas, uere florere dicenda est. hi autem mores in ecclesiis toto orbe crescentibus tamquam in sanctis auditoriis populorum docentur atque discuntur et maxime pietas, qua uerus et uerax colatur deus, qui haec omnia, quibus animus humanus diuinae societati ad inhabitandam aeternam caelestemque ciuitatem instruitur et aptatur, non solum iubet adgredienda, uerum etiam donat implenda. inde est, quod deorum multorum falsorumque simulacra et praedixit euersum iri et praecepit euerti. nihil enim homines tam insociabiles reddit uitae peruersitate quam illorum deorum imitatio, quales describuntur et commendantur litteris eorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Look a little at those very books ‘On the Republic’ from which you drank in that affection of a most loving citizen, that ‘there is no measure or limit to the good man’s care for his country.’ Look, I beseech you, and see with what praises frugality and self-control are proclaimed there, and faithfulness to the marriage bond, and chaste, honourable, and upright morals; when a city excels in these, it may truly be said to flourish. And these morals are taught and learned in the churches growing throughout the world, as in holy lecture halls of the peoples, and above all the piety by which the true and truthful God is worshipped, who not only commands us to undertake, but also grants us to fulfil, all those things by which the human mind is instructed and fitted for divine fellowship, to dwell in the eternal and heavenly city. That is why he both foretold that the images of the many false gods would be overthrown and commanded that they be overthrown. For nothing makes men so unsociable through perversity of life as the imitation of those gods, such as they are described and commended in their own literature.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Rep. (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, De re publica. Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.3 (CSEL 34.2:428–429; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-3).

## Letter 91.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:429–430
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues, citing Terence and Cicero, that imitating the pagan gods makes men worse, as with the young man in Terence who excused his lust by Jupiter’s example.

### Latin text

Denique illi doctissimi uiri, qui rem publicam ciuitatemque terrenam, qualis eis esse debere uidebatur, magis domesticis disputationibus requirebant uel etiam describebant, quam publicis actionibus instituebant atque formabant, egregios atque laudabiles, quos putabant, homines potius quam deos suos imitandos proponebant erudiendae indoli iuuentutis. et re uera Terentianus ille adulescens, qui spectans tabulam pictam in pariete, ubi pictura inerat de adulterio regis deorum, libidinem, qua rapiebatur, stimulis etiam tantae auctoritatis accendit, nullo modo in illud flagitium uel concupiscendo laberetur uel perpetrando inmergeretur, si Catonem maluisset imitari quam Iouem; sed quo pacto id faceret, cum in templis adorare cogeretur Iouem potius quam Catonem? uerum haec ex comoedia, quibus impiorum luxus et sacrilega superstitio conuinceretur, proferre forsitan non debemus. lege uel recole, in eisdem libris quam prudenter disseratur nullo modo potuisse scriptiones et actiones recipi comoediarum, nisi mores recipientium consonarent. ita clarissimorum uirorum in re publica excellentium et de re publica disputantium auctoritate firmatur nequissimos homines fieri deorum imitatione peiores non sane uerorum sed falsorum atque fictorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Indeed, those most learned men who sought or even described the commonwealth and earthly city, such as they thought it ought to be, in private discussions rather than establishing and shaping it by public action, proposed for the education of the character of youth men they thought outstanding and praiseworthy to be imitated, rather than their gods. And truly that young man in Terence who, looking at a picture painted on the wall, in which there was a painting of the adultery of the king of the gods, inflamed the lust by which he was carried away with the goad of so great an authority, would in no way have slipped into that shameful act by desiring it, or sunk into it by committing it, if he had chosen to imitate Cato rather than Jupiter; but how could he do so, when he was compelled to worship Jupiter rather than Cato in the temples? But perhaps we ought not to bring forward these examples from comedy, by which the dissoluteness and sacrilegious superstition of the ungodly might be refuted. Read or recall how wisely it is argued in those same books that the writings and performances of comedies could never have been accepted unless the morals of those who accepted them had agreed with them. Thus it is confirmed by the authority of most famous men, eminent in the commonwealth and discussing the commonwealth, that the most wicked men become worse by imitating gods, not true gods, of course, but false and fictitious ones.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Eun. 583–591 (Terence): allusion, high confidence
- Cicero, Rep. 4 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The young man is Chaerea in Terence, Eunuchus 583–591 (painting of Jupiter and Danae). The argument about comedy is from Cicero, De re publica 4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.4 (CSEL 34.2:429–430; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-4).

## Letter 91.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:430–431
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine mocks the claim that the myths of the gods are interpreted allegorically, pointing to the public celebration of Jupiter’s adulteries and the obscene games of Flora.

### Latin text

At enim illa omnia, quae antiquitus de uita deorum moribusque conscripta sunt, longe aliter sunt intellegenda atque interpretanda sapientibus. ita uero in templis populis congregatis recitari huiusce modi salubres interpretationes heri et nudiustertius audiuimus. quaeso te, sicine caecum est humanum genus aduersus ueritatem, ut tam aperta et manifesta non sentiat? tot locis pingitur, funditur, tunditur, sculpitur, scribitur, legitur, agitur, cantatur, saltatur Iuppiter adulteria tanta committens; quantum erat, ut in suo saltem Capitolio ista prohibens legeretur? haec mala dedecoris impietatisque plenissima si nemine prohibente in populis ferueant, adorentur in templis, rideantur in theatris, cum his uictimas immolant, uastetur pecus etiam pauperum, cum haec histriones agunt et saltant, effundantur patrimonia diuitum, ciuitates florere dicuntur? horum plane florum non terra fertilis, non aliqua opulens uirtus sed illa dea Flora digna mater inuenta est, cuius ludi scenici tam effusiore et licentiore turpitudine celebrantur, ut quiuis intellegat, quale daemonium sit, quod placari aliter non potest, nisi illic non aues, non quadrupedes, non denique sanguis humanus sed multo scelestius pudor humanus tamquam immolatus intereat.

### English translation (Claude)

‘But all those things that were written long ago about the life and morals of the gods are to be understood and interpreted quite differently by the wise.’ Indeed, we heard yesterday and the day before such wholesome interpretations recited in the temples to the assembled peoples! I ask you, is the human race so blind to the truth that it does not perceive things so open and manifest? In so many places Jupiter is painted, cast, hammered, sculpted, written, read, acted, sung, danced, committing so many adulteries; how much would it have been if, at least in his own Capitol, he were read prohibiting such things? If these evils, full of disgrace and impiety, seethe among the peoples with no one prohibiting them, are adored in the temples, laughed at in the theatres; if, when victims are sacrificed to them, even the cattle of the poor are wasted, and when actors perform and dance these things, the patrimonies of the rich are poured out, are cities said to flourish? Plainly the mother found worthy of these flowers is not a fertile earth, nor any rich virtue, but that goddess Flora, whose stage games are celebrated with such lavish and licentious filthiness that anyone may understand what kind of demon it is that cannot be appeased except by the slaughter there, not of birds, not of four-footed beasts, not even of human blood, but, much more wickedly, of human modesty, perishing as if sacrificed.

### Translation notes

- The Floralia were Roman festival games notorious for obscenity. Polemical; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.5 (CSEL 34.2:430–431; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-5).

## Letter 91.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:431
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Calama will truly flourish only when converted to God, and that he seeks both Christian gentleness and a correction that does not encourage imitation.

### Latin text

Haec dixi, propter quod scripsisti, quantum tibi aetas fini proxima est, cupere te, ut patriam tuam incolumem ac florentem relinquas. tollantur illa omnia uana et insana, conuertantur homines ad uerum dei cultum moresque castos et pios; tunc patriam tuam florentem uidebis non opinione stultorum sed ueritate sapientium, cum haec patria carnalis generationis tuae portio fuerit illius patriae, cui non corpore sed fide nascimur, ubi omnes sancti et fideles dei post labores uelut hiemales uitae huius intermina aeternitate florebunt. nobis itaque cordi est neque Christianam amittere mansuetudinem neque perniciosum ceteris imitationis exemplum in illa ciuitate relinquere. quo modo id agamus, aderit deus, si eis non ita grauiter indignetur. alioquin et mansuetudo, quam seruare cupimus, et disciplina, qua uti moderate nitimur, impediri potest, si deo aliud in occulto placet siue iudicanti hoc tantum malum flagello acriore plectendum siue etiam uehementius irascenti, si non correctis nec ad se conuersis ad tempus esse uoluerit inpunitum.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said these things because you wrote that, the nearer your age is to its end, the more you desire to leave your country safe and flourishing. Let all those vain and insane things be taken away; let men be converted to the true worship of God and to chaste and godly morals: then you will see your country flourishing, not in the opinion of fools but in the truth of the wise, when this country of your fleshly birth has become a portion of that country into which we are born not by the body but by faith, where all the saints and faithful of God, after the wintry labours, as it were, of this life, will flourish in unending eternity. It is our heart’s desire, therefore, neither to lose Christian gentleness nor to leave in that city an example harmful for others to imitate. How we are to do this, God will help us, if he is not too gravely angry with them. Otherwise both the gentleness which we desire to keep and the discipline which we strive to use moderately may be hindered, if something else pleases God in secret, whether judging that so great an evil must be punished with a sharper scourge, or even, being more vehemently angry, if he wills that it remain unpunished for a time, while they are not corrected or converted to him.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.6 (CSEL 34.2:431; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-6).

## Letter 91.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:431–432
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts Nectarius’s account of a bishop’s duty but explains that true salvation and pardon require correction, not impunity.

### Latin text

Praescribit nobis quodam modo prudentia tua de persona episcopali et dicis patriam tuam non leui populi sui errato prolapsam. quod quidem si iuris publici rigore metiamur, debet plecti seueriore censura; sed episcopum, inquis, fas non est nisi salutem hominibus impertire et pro statu meliore causis adesse et apud omnipotentem deum ueniam aliorum mereri delictis. hoc omnino seruare conamur, ut seueriore censura nemo plectatur neque a nobis neque ab alio ullo intercedentibus nobis, et salutem hominibus cupimus impertire. quae posita est in recte uiuendi felicitate, non in male faciendi securitate. ueniam quoque non tantum nostris uerum et aliorum instamus delictis mereri, quod impetrare nisi pro correctis omnino non possumus. adiungis etiam et dicis: Quanta possum supplicatione deposco, ut, si defendenda res est, innoxius defendatur, ab innocentibus molestia separetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Your Prudence in a way prescribes to us concerning the role of a bishop, and you say that your country ‘has fallen through no light offence of its people. If indeed we measure it by the rigour of public law, it ought to be punished with a severer sentence. But it is not right,’ you say, ‘for a bishop to do anything but bestow salvation on men, to stand by causes for the better state of things, and to obtain from almighty God pardon for the faults of others.’ This we try wholly to observe: that no one be punished with a severer sentence, either by us or by anyone else at our intercession; and we desire to bestow on men salvation, which consists in the happiness of living rightly, not in the security of doing wrong. We also strive to obtain pardon not only for our own faults but also for those of others, which we cannot obtain at all except for those who are corrected. You add further and say: ‘I ask with all the supplication I can that, if the matter is to be defended, the harmless be defended and trouble be kept from the innocent.’

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Nectarius, Ep. 90.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.7 (CSEL 34.2:431–432; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-7).

## Letter 91.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:432–433
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts the pagan riot at Calama on 1 June 408: a forbidden festival, repeated stoning of the church, arson, and the murder of a monk, while the town’s leaders did nothing.

### Latin text

Accipe breuiter, quae commissa sint, et noxios ab innocentibus ipse discerne. contra recentissimas leges Kalendis Iuniis festo paganorum sacrilega sollemnitas agitata est nemine prohibente tam insolenti ausu, ut, quod nec Iuliani temporibus factum est, petulantissima turba saltantium in eodem prorsus uico ante fores transiret ecclesiae. quam rem inlicitissimam atque indignissimam clericis prohibere temptantibus ecclesia lapidata est. deinde post dies ferme octo, cum leges notissimas episcopus ordini replicasset et dum ea, quae iussa sunt, uelut implere disponunt, iterum ecclesia lapidata est. postridie nostris ad inponendum perditis metum, quod uidebatur, apud acta dicere uolentibus publica iura negata sunt eodemque ipso die, ne uel diuinitus terrerentur, grando lapidationibus reddita est, qua transacta continuo tertiam lapidationem et postremo ignes ecclesiasticis tectis atque hominibus intulerunt, unum seruorum dei, qui oberrans occurrere potuit, occiderunt ceteris partim, ubi potuerant, latitantibus partim, qua potuerant, fugientibus, cum interea contrusus atque coartatus quodam loco se occultaret episcopus, ubi se ad mortem quaerentium uoces audiebat sibique increpantium, quod eo non inuento gratis tantum perpetrassent scelus. gesta sunt haec ab hora ferme decima usque ad noctis partem non minimam. nemo compescere, nemo subuenire temptauit illorum, quorum esse grauis posset auctoritas, praeter unum peregrinum, per quem et plurimi serui dei de manibus interficere conantium liberati sunt et multa extorta praedantibus. per quem clarum factum est, quam facile illa uel omnino non fierent uel coepta desisterent, si ciues maximeque primates ea fieri perficique uetuissent.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear briefly what was done, and distinguish the guilty from the innocent yourself. Against the most recent laws, on the Kalends of June, a sacrilegious pagan festival was celebrated with no one prohibiting it, with such insolent daring that, what was not done even in the times of Julian, a most impudent crowd of dancers passed right along the same street before the doors of the church. When the clergy tried to prohibit this most unlawful and most unworthy thing, the church was stoned. Then about eight days later, when the bishop had reminded the council of the well-known laws, and while they were making a show of arranging to carry out what was ordered, the church was stoned again. The next day, when our people wished to make a statement in the records, to put fear into the wicked, as seemed right, they were denied their public rights; and on that same day, that they might be frightened at least by heaven, hail was returned for the stonings; and when it had passed, they at once made a third stoning and finally set fire to the church buildings and the people; they killed one of the servants of God who, wandering, happened to meet them, while the rest hid partly where they could and fled partly as they could; meanwhile the bishop, thrust into a certain place and squeezed in, hid himself there, where he heard the voices of those seeking him to kill him and reproaching themselves because, not having found him, they had committed so great a crime for nothing. These things were done from about the tenth hour until no small part of the night. No one of those whose authority could carry weight tried to restrain them, no one to help, except one stranger, through whom very many servants of God were freed from the hands of those trying to kill them and much was wrested from the plunderers. Through him it was made clear how easily these things would either not have happened at all or would have stopped once begun, if the citizens, and especially the leading men, had forbidden them to be done and carried through.

### Translation notes

- ‘The most recent laws’ are imperial laws of 407–408 against pagan festivals. Julian the Apostate, emperor 361–363. The bishop of Calama was Possidius. ‘That they might be frightened at least by heaven’: the printed ne uel diuinitus terrerentur is awkward (literally ‘lest they be frightened even by heaven’); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.8 (CSEL 34.2:432–433; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-8).

## Letter 91.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:433–434
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes degrees of guilt among the people of Calama and asks that the guilty be spared life and livelihood but deprived of the wealth that enables their wickedness.

### Latin text

Proinde in uniuersa illa ciuitate non innocentes a nocentibus sed minus nocentes a nocentioribus poteris fortasse discernere. nam in paruo peccato illi sunt, qui metu deterriti maximeque, ne offenderent eos, quos in illo oppido plurimum posse et inimicos ecclesiae nouerant, opem ferre non ausi sunt; scelerati autem omnes, quibus etsi non facientibus neque inmittentibus tamen uolentibus ista commissa sunt; sceleratiores, qui commiserunt; sceleratissimi, qui inmiserunt. sed de inmissione suspicionem putemus esse, non ueritatem nec ea discutiamus, quae nisi tormentis eorum, per quos inquiruntur, inueniri omnino non possunt. demus etiam ueniam timori eorum, qui potius deum pro episcopo et seruis eius deprecandum quam potentes inimicos ecclesiae offendendos esse putauerunt. quid eos, qui restant, nullane censes disciplina cohercendos et proponendum aestimas inpunitum tam immanis furoris exemplum? non praeterita uindicando pascere iram nostram studemus, sed misericorditer in futurum consulendo satagimus. habent homines mali, ubi et per Christianos non solum mansuete uerum etiam utiliter salubriterque plectantur: habent enim. quod corpore incolumi uiuunt, habent, unde uiuunt, habent, unde male uiuunt. duo prima salua sint, ut, quos paeniteat, sint; hoc optamus, hoc, quantum in nobis est, etiam inpensa opera instamus. tertium uero si deus uoluerit tamquam putre noxiumque resecari, ualde misericorditer puniet: si autem uel amplius uoluerit uel ne hoc quidem permiserit, altioris et profecto iustioris consilii ratio penes ipsum est; a nobis curam officiumque oportet inpendi, quousque uidere conceditur. deprecantibus eum, ut animum nostrum adprobet, quo cunctis uolumus esse consultum, nihilque fieri sinat per nos, quod et nobis et ecclesiae suae non expedire longe melius nouit ipse quam nos.

### English translation (Claude)

So in that whole city you will perhaps be able to distinguish not the innocent from the guilty but the less guilty from the more guilty. For those are in slight sin who, deterred by fear, and especially of offending those whom they knew to be most powerful in that town and enemies of the church, did not dare to bring help; but all are criminals by whose will these things were committed, even if they did not do them or instigate them; more criminal are those who committed them; most criminal those who instigated them. But let us suppose that the instigation is a suspicion and not the truth, and let us not examine those things which cannot be found out at all except by torturing those through whom they are investigated. Let us also pardon the fear of those who thought it better to pray to God for the bishop and his servants than to offend the powerful enemies of the church. What of those who remain? Do you think they should be restrained by no discipline, and that so savage an example of fury should be set forth unpunished? We are not eager to feed our anger by avenging what is past, but we take pains to provide mercifully for the future. Wicked men have things in which they may be punished by Christians not only gently but also usefully and wholesomely; for they have the fact that they live with body unharmed, they have the means by which they live, and they have the means by which they live wickedly. Let the first two be kept safe, so that there may be those who repent; this we desire, and as far as lies in us we press for it with earnest effort. But the third, if God wills to cut it off as rotten and harmful, he will punish very mercifully; but if he wills either more, or does not permit even this, the reason of a higher and certainly juster counsel lies with him. From us must be given care and duty, as far as we are permitted to see; praying him to approve our intention, by which we wish all to be provided for, and to let nothing be done through us which he knows much better than we do is not expedient for us and for his church.

### Translation notes

- Concerns the punishment of the Calama rioters; Augustine opposes bodily punishment and torture. Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.9 (CSEL 34.2:433–434; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-9).

## Letter 91.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:434–436
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports meeting both Christians and pagans at Calama, and seeks a correction that deters imitation while winning souls.

### Latin text

Modo cum apud Calamam essemus, ut nostri in tam graui dolore uel consolarentur afflicti uel sedarentur accensi, quantum potuimus. quod in tempore oportuisse existimauimus. cum Christianis egimus. deinde ipsos etiam paganos, mali tanti caput et causam, petentes, ut ab eis uideremur, admisimus, ut hac occasione admoneremus eos, quid facere deberent, si saperent, non tantum pro remouenda praesenti sollicitudine uerum etiam pro inquirenda salute perpetua. multa a nobis audierunt, multum etiam ipsi rogauerunt; sed absit. ut tales serui simus, quos ab eis rogari delectet, a quibus noster dominus non rogatur. unde peruides pro uiuacitate mentis tuae ad hoc esse nitendum seruata mansuetudine et moderatione Christiana, ut aut ceteros deterreamus eorum imitari peruersitatem aut ceteros optemus eorum imitari correctionem. damna, quae inlata sunt, uel tolerantur a Christianis uel resarciuntur per Christianos. animarum nos lucra, quibus adquirendis cum periculo etiam sanguinis inhiamus, et in loco illo quaestuosius prouenire et aliis locis illo exemplo non impediri desideramus. dei misericordia nobis praestet de tua salute gaudere.

### English translation (Claude)

Recently, when we were at Calama, so that our people in so great a grief might be either consoled in their affliction or calmed in their anger, we did with the Christians, as far as we could, what we thought was needed at that time. Then we also admitted the pagans themselves, the head and cause of so great an evil, at their request to see us, so that on this occasion we might admonish them what they ought to do, if they were wise, not only to remove their present anxiety but also to seek eternal salvation. They heard much from us, and they themselves also asked much; but far be it from us to be such servants as are pleased to be asked by those by whom our Lord is not asked. So you see, in the liveliness of your mind, that we must strive, while keeping Christian gentleness and moderation, either to deter others from imitating their perversity or to wish that others may imitate their correction. The losses that were inflicted are either borne by Christians or made good through Christians. The gains of souls, which we long to acquire even at the risk of our blood, we desire both to come about more profitably in that place and not to be hindered in other places by that example. May the mercy of God grant us to rejoice in your salvation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 91.10 (CSEL 34.2:434–436; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-91-10).

## Letter 92.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:436–437
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine consoles the widow Italica with Christian hope of reunion with the departed in the life to come.

### Latin text

Non solum litteris tuis uerum etiam ipso referente, qui pertulit, comperi multum te flagitare litteras meas credentem, quod ex eis consolationem habere plurimam possis. tu itaque uideris, quid exinde capias, ego tamen eas negare uel differre non debui. consoletur te autem fides et spes tua et ipsa caritas, quae diffunditur in cordibus piorum per spiritum sanctum, cuius nunc aliquid pro pignore accepimus, ut ipsam plenitudinem desiderare nouerimus. non enim te desolatam putare debes, cum in interiore homine habeas praesentem Christum per fidem in corde tuo, aut sic te contristari oportet quem ad modum gentes, quae spem non habent, cum ueracissima promissione speremus nos in hac uita, unde migraturi quosdam nostros migrantes non amisimus, sed praemisimus, ad eam uitam esse uenturos, ubi nobis erunt quanto notiores tanto utique cariores et sine timore ullius discessionis amabiles.

### English translation (Claude)

I have learned, not only from your letter but also from the report of the man who brought it, that you are earnestly asking for a letter from me, believing that you can have very great consolation from it. You must see what you gain from it; but I ought not to refuse or delay it. May your faith and hope console you, and love itself, which is poured out in the hearts of the godly by the Holy Spirit, of whom we have now received something as a pledge, that we may learn to long for the fullness itself. For you ought not to think yourself desolate when you have Christ present in the inner man by faith in your heart; nor ought you to be saddened like the Gentiles who have no hope, since by a most truthful promise we hope that we, who are to depart from this life, from which we have not lost but sent ahead some of our own who are departing, shall come to that life where they will be the dearer to us the better known they are, and lovable without fear of any parting.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:5: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 3:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Italica, a Roman widow of high rank. Allusions: Rom 5:5; 2 Cor 1:22; Eph 3:16–17; 1 Thess 4:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 92.1 (CSEL 34.2:436–437; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-1).

## Letter 92.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:437–438
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that in the resurrection hearts will be open to one another in the light of God, who is seen by purified minds, not bodily eyes.

### Latin text

Hic autem etsi tuus coniux, cuius abscessu uidua diceris, tibi notissimus erat, notior tamen erat sibi quam tibi. et unde hoc. cum tu eius corporalem faciem uideres, quam ipse utique non uidebat, nisi quia notitia nostri certior intus est. ubi nemo scit, quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis. qui in ipso est? sed cum uenerit dominus et inluminauerit abscondita tenebrarum et manifestauerit cogitationes cordis, tunc nihil latebit proximum in proximo nec erit, quod suis quisque aperiat, abscondat alienis, ubi nullus erit alienus. lux uero ipsa, qua inluminabuntur haec omnia, quae modo in cordibus reconduntur, qualis aut quanta sit, quis lingua proferat, quis saltem infirma mente contingat? profecto lux illa ipse deus est, quoniam deus lux est et tenebrae in eo non sunt ullae, sed lux mentium purgatarum, non istorum corporis oculorum. erit ergo tunc mens idonea, quae illam lucem uideat, quod nunc nondum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Here, however, although your husband, by whose departure you are called a widow, was very well known to you, he was better known to himself than to you. And why so, when you saw his bodily face, which he certainly did not see, unless because our knowledge of ourselves is surer within, where ‘no one knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him’? But when the Lord comes and brings to light the hidden things of darkness and makes manifest the thoughts of the heart, then nothing in a neighbour will be hidden from his neighbour, nor will there be anything that one opens to his own and hides from strangers, where no one will be a stranger. But that light itself, by which all these things now hidden in hearts will be illumined, who can express with the tongue what it is like or how great, who can touch it even with a weak mind? Surely that light is God himself, since ‘God is light and in him there is no darkness at all’; but he is the light of purified minds, not of these eyes of the body. Then, therefore, the mind will be fit to see that light, which it is not yet now.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 2:11; 1 Cor 4:5; 1 John 1:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 92.2 (CSEL 34.2:437–438; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-2).

## Letter 92.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:438–440
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that God, who is not in place, cannot be seen by bodily eyes, but will be seen by the inner man as he is renewed in God’s likeness.

### Latin text

Hoc autem oculus corporis neque nunc potest neque tunc poterit. omne quippe, quod oculis corporis conspici potest. in loco aliquo sit necesse est nec ubique sit totum, sed minore sui parte minorem locum occupet et maiore maiorem. non ita est deus inuisibilis et incorruptibilis, qui solus habet inmortalitatem et lucem habitat inaccessibilem, quem nemo hominum uidit nec uidere potest. per hoc enim uideri ab homine non potest, per quod uidet homo corpore corpora. nam si et mentibus piorum esset inaccessibilis, non diceretur: Accedite ad eum et inluminamini, et si mentibus piorum esset inuisibilis, non diceretur: Videbimus eum, sicuti est. nam perspice totam ipsam in epistula Iohannis sententiam: Dilectissimi. inquit, filii dei sumus et nondum apparuit, quod erimus. scimus, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est. in tantum ergo uidebimus, in quantum similes erimus, quia et nunc in tantum non uidemus, in quantum dissimiles sumus. inde igitur uidebimus, ubi similes erimus. quis autem dementissimus dixerit corpore nos uel esse uel futuros esse similes deo? in interiore igitur homine ista similitudo est, qui renouatur in agnitione dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit eum. et tanto efficimur similiores illi, quanto magis in eius cognitione et caritate proficimus, quia, etsi exterior homo noster corrumpitur, sed interior renouatur de die in diem ita sane, ut in hac uita, quantuscumque prouectus sit, longe absit ab illa perfectione similitudinis, quae idonea erit ad uidendum deum, sicut dicit apostolus, facie ad faciem. in quibus certe uerbis si corporalem faciem uoluerimus accipere, consequens erit, ut etiam deus talem habeat faciem et sit aliquod interuallum inter nostram et ipsius, cum eum uidebimus facie ad faciem, et si interuallum, utique finis et membrorum habitus terminatus et cetera absurda dictuque et cogitatu impia, quibus animalis homo non percipiens, quae sunt spiritus dei, fallacissimis uanitatibus luditur.

### English translation (Claude)

But the eye of the body can neither do this now nor will be able to then. For everything that can be seen by the eyes of the body must be in some place, and is not whole everywhere, but occupies a smaller place with a smaller part of itself and a larger with a larger. God is not like this, invisible and incorruptible, ‘who alone has immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see.’ For he cannot be seen by man by that by which man sees bodies with the body. For if he were unapproachable even to the minds of the godly, it would not be said, ‘Approach him and be enlightened’; and if he were invisible to the minds of the godly, it would not be said, ‘We shall see him as he is.’ For consider the whole sentence in the letter of John: ‘Beloved,’ he says, ‘we are children of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. We know that when he appears we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.’ So we shall see in so far as we shall be like him, because even now we do not see in so far as we are unlike. We shall see, then, by that in which we shall be like him. But who, however mad, would say that we are or shall be like God in body? This likeness, then, is in the inner man, ‘who is renewed in the knowledge of God according to the image of him who created him.’ And we are made the more like him the more we advance in knowledge and love of him; for ‘though our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is renewed day by day’; in such a way, however, that in this life, however far one has advanced, one is far from that perfection of likeness which will be fit to see God, as the apostle says, ‘face to face.’ If in these words we wish to take ‘face’ as bodily, it will follow that God too has such a face, and that there is some distance between ours and his when we see him face to face; and if distance, then certainly limit, and a bounded arrangement of members, and other things absurd and impious to say or think, by which the natural man, who does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God, is mocked by most deceitful vanities.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 1:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 34:5 (33:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:10: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Tim 1:17; 1 Tim 6:16; Ps 34:5 (LXX 33:6); 1 John 3:2; Col 3:10; 2 Cor 4:16; 1 Cor 13:12; 1 Cor 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 92.3 (CSEL 34.2:438–440; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-3).

## Letter 92.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:440–443
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refutes those who claim that God will be seen with bodily eyes, even by the wicked, arguing from Scripture that only the pure in heart will see God, and that with the inner man.

### Latin text

Dicunt enim quidam eorum, qui talia garriunt, sicut ad me potuit peruenire, nos deum uidere nunc mente tunc corpore, ita ut etiam impios eum pari modo adseuerent esse uisuros. uide, quantum in peius profecerint. dum sine limite timoris uel pudoris hac atque hac uagabunda fertur inpunita loquacitas. antea dicebant carni suae tantum hoc praestitisse Christum, ut corporeis oculis uideret deum; deinde addiderunt etiam omnes sanctos receptis in resurrectione corporibus eodem modo deum esse uisuros; nunc iam istam possibilitatem etiam impiis donauerunt. donent sane, quantum uolunt et quibus uolunt; nam quis audeat contra dicere hominibus de suo donantibus? qui enim loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur. tu autem cum his, qui sanam doctrinam tenent, nihil istorum audeas usurpare de tuo; sed cum legis: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, intellege impios non uisuros; neque enim beati et mundi corde sunt impii. item cum legis: Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem, intellege inde nos tunc uisuros facie ad faciem, unde nunc uidemus per speculum in aenigmate. hoc autem utrumque interioris hominis munus est, siue cum in ista peregrinatione adhuc per fidem ambulatur, in qua utitur speculo et aenigmate, siue in illa patria, cum per speciem contemplabitur, pro qua uisione positum est facie ad faciem. Audiat caro carnalibus cogitationibus ebria: Spiritus est deus et ideo, qui adorant deum, in spiritu et ueritate oportet adorare. si adorare, quanto magis uidere! quis enim audeat adfirmare dei substantiam corporaliter uideri, cum eam noluerit corporaliter adorari? sed argute sibi uidentur dicere et quasi interrogando premere: Potuit Christus praestare carni suae, ut oculis corporeis uideret patrem, an non potuit? ut, si non potuisse responderimus, omnipotentiae dei nos derogasse proclament; si autem potuisse concesserimus, argumentationem suam ex nostra responsione concludant. quanto iam tolerabilius desipiunt, qui carnem adserunt conuersum iri in substantiam dei et hoc futuram esse, quod deus est, ut sic eam saltem deo uidendo faciant idoneam non tanta diuersitate dissimilem. quam uanitatem credo istos abigere a fide sua, fortasse et ab auribus. et tamen si interrogatione de hoc similiter urgeantur, possitne hoc deus, an non possit efficere, utrum eius potestati detrahent, si non posse responderint, an hoc futurum fatebuntur, si posse concesserint? quo modo ergo exierint de hoc alieno laqueo, sic exeant de suo. deinde cur solis oculis corporis Christi hoc donum adtributum esse contendunt, non etiam ceteris sensibus? sonus ergo erit deus, ut possit eius etiam auribus percipi? et halitus erit, ut sentiri possit eius olfactu? et liquor aliquis erit, ut possit et bibi? et moles erit, ut possit et tangi? non, inquiunt. quid ergo? an illud potest deus et hoc non potest? si non posse dixerint, cur derogant omnipotentiae dei? si posse et nolle responderint, cur solis oculis fauent, inuident autem ceteris sensibus corporis Christi? an, quousque uolunt, desipiunt? quanto nos melius, qui non eorum insipientiae terminos figimus, sed, ut desipiant prorsus, nolumus!

### English translation (Claude)

For some of those who chatter such things say, as far as could reach me, that we see God now with the mind but then with the body, so that they even assert that the ungodly will see him in the same way. See how far they have advanced for the worse, while unpunished talkativeness wanders hither and thither without the limit of fear or shame. Formerly they said that Christ granted this to his own flesh alone, that it should see God with bodily eyes; then they added that all the saints too, having received their bodies in the resurrection, would see God in the same way; now they have granted this possibility even to the ungodly. Let them grant as much as they will and to whom they will; for who would dare to contradict men giving of their own? ‘For he who speaks a lie speaks of his own.’ But you, with those who hold sound doctrine, do not dare to claim anything of these things of your own; but when you read, ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,’ understand that the ungodly will not see him; for the ungodly are neither blessed nor pure in heart. Likewise, when you read, ‘We see now through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face,’ understand that we shall then see face to face by that by which we now see through a mirror in an enigma. Both of these are the work of the inner man, whether when in this pilgrimage one still walks by faith, in which it uses a mirror and an enigma, or in that homeland when it will contemplate by sight, for which vision ‘face to face’ is put. Let the flesh drunk with carnal thoughts hear: ‘God is spirit, and therefore those who worship God must worship in spirit and truth.’ If worship, how much more see! For who would dare to affirm that the substance of God is seen bodily, when he did not wish it to be worshipped bodily? But they think they speak cleverly and press us, as it were, with a question: ‘Could Christ grant to his flesh that it should see the Father with bodily eyes, or could he not?’ So that, if we answer that he could not, they may proclaim that we have detracted from God’s omnipotence; but if we concede that he could, they may conclude their argument from our answer. How much more tolerably foolish are those who assert that the flesh will be changed into the substance of God and will become what God is, so as at least to make it fit to see God by making it not so different from him! I believe these men drive away that vanity from their faith, perhaps even from their ears. And yet, if they were pressed in the same way with the question whether God can bring this about or cannot, will they detract from his power if they answer that he cannot, or will they admit that it will happen if they concede that he can? As, then, they would escape from this snare of others, so let them escape from their own. Next, why do they contend that this gift was attributed only to the eyes of Christ’s body, and not to the other senses as well? Will God then be a sound, so that he can be perceived by his ears too? And will he be a breath, so that he can be sensed by his smell? And will he be some liquid, so that he can also be drunk? And will he be a mass, so that he can also be touched? ‘No,’ they say. What then? Can God do the one and not the other? If they say he cannot, why do they detract from God’s omnipotence? If they answer that he can but will not, why do they favour only the eyes and begrudge the other senses of Christ’s body? Or are they foolish just as far as they wish? How much better are we, who do not fix limits to their folly, but wish them not to be foolish at all!

### Scripture references

- John 8:44: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 2:1: echo, low confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: allusion, high confidence
- John 4:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 8:44; Matt 5:8; 1 Cor 13:12; John 4:24; allusions: 2 Cor 5:6–7. Doctrinally significant (the vision of God); translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 92.4 (CSEL 34.2:440–443; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-4).

## Letter 92.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:443–444
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Italica to answer such views with his letter, since faith purifies the heart for the vision of God, which a mind fixed on the flesh cannot attain.

### Latin text

Multa proferri possunt ad istam dementiam refutandam. sed si aliquando inruerint auribus tuis, haec eis interim lege et, quid respondeant, non te pigeat rescribere, ut potes. ad hoc enim fide corda nostra mundantur, quia nobis fidei merces uisio dei promittitur. quae si per corporis oculos erit, frustra ad eam percipiendam sanctorum animus exercetur, immo uero tam peruerse sentiens animus non exercetur in se, sed totus in carne est. ubi enim tenacius habitabit et fixius, nisi unde se deum uisurum esse praesumit? quod certe quantum malum sit, intellegentiae potius dimitto tuae, quam longo sermone molior explicare. in protectione domini semper habitet cor tuum, domina eximia et merito praestantissima atque in Christi caritate honoranda filia. honorabiles tecum nobisque in domino dilectissimos filios tuos debito meritis uestris officio resaluto.

### English translation (Claude)

Much can be brought forward to refute this madness. But if it should ever assail your ears, read them this meanwhile, and do not be reluctant to write back, as you can, what they answer. For our hearts are cleansed by faith for this reason, that the vision of God is promised us as the reward of faith. If it is to be through the eyes of the body, the mind of the saints is exercised in vain to attain it; nay rather, a mind that thinks so perversely is not exercised in itself but is wholly in the flesh. For where will it dwell more tenaciously and more firmly than where it presumes it will see God? How great an evil this is I leave rather to your understanding than labour to explain in a long discourse. May your heart always dwell in the protection of the Lord, excellent lady, deservedly most distinguished, daughter to be honoured in the love of Christ. I return the greetings, with the respect due to your merits, of your honourable children, most beloved to you and to us in the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Acts 15:9: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 91:1 (90:1 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion to Acts 15:9; Ps 91:1 (LXX 90:1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 92.5 (CSEL 34.2:443–444; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-92-5).

## Letter 93.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:445–446
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Rogatist bishop Vincentius, defending the restraint of the Donatists by the civil authorities because many have been corrected by it.

### Latin text

Accepi epistulam, quam tuam esse non mihi incredibile uisum est; adtulit enim eam, quem catholicum Christianum esse constaret, qui, ut opinor, mihi mentiri audere non posset. sed etsi forte non sunt litterae tuae, ego ei, qui scripsit, rescribendum putaui nunc me potius quietis esse auidum et petentem quam tunc, cum me adulescentem uiuo adhuc Rogato, cui successisti, apud Carthaginem noueras. sed Donatistae nimium inquieti sunt, quos per ordinatas a deo potestates cohiberi atque corrigi non mihi uidetur inutile. nam de multorum iam correctione gaudemus, qui tam ueraciter unitatem catholicam tenent atque defendunt et a pristino errore se liberatos esse laetantur, ut eos cum magna gratulatione miremur. qui tamen nescio qua ui consuetudinis nullo modo mutari in melius cogitarent, nisi hoc terrore perculsi sollicitam mentem ad considerationem ueritatis intenderent, ne forte, si non pro iustitia sed pro peruersitate et praesumptione hominum ipsas temporales molestias infructuosa et uana tolerantia paterentur, apud deum postea non inuenirent nisi debitas poenas impiorum, qui eius tam lenem admonitionem et paterna flagella contempserint, ac sic ista cogitatione dociles facti non in calumniis et fabulis humanis sed in diuinis libris promissam per omnes gentes inuenirent ecclesiam, quam suis oculis reddi conspicerent, in quibus et Christum praenuntiatum etiam non uisum super caelos esse minime dubitarent. num quidnam ego istorum saluti inuidere debebam, ut collegas meos ab huius modi paterna diligentia reuocarem, per quam factum est, ut multos uideamus accusare suam pristinam caecitatem? qui cum super caelos exaltatum Christum etiam non uidentes credebant, gloriam tamen eius super omnem terram etiam uidentes negabant, cum propheta utrumque una sententia tanta manifestatione complexus sit dicens: Exaltare super caelos, deus, et super omnem terram gloria tua.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received a letter which I did not find it hard to believe is yours, for it was brought by a man known to be a Catholic Christian, who, I think, would not dare to lie to me. But even if the letter is perhaps not yours, I thought I should write back to whoever wrote it that I am now more eager for quiet and more desirous of it than I was then, when you knew me at Carthage as a young man, while Rogatus, whom you succeeded, was still alive. But the Donatists are far too restless, and it does not seem to me useless that they should be restrained and corrected by the authorities ordained by God. For we already rejoice over the correction of many who hold and defend Catholic unity so sincerely, and are so glad to have been set free from their former error, that we marvel at them with great joy. Yet these, by some force of habit, would never have thought of changing for the better had they not been struck with this fear and turned their anxious minds to consider the truth. They feared that if they endured these temporal troubles with a fruitless and empty endurance, not for the sake of righteousness but for human perversity and presumption, they would afterwards find with God nothing but the punishment due to the ungodly who had despised so gentle a warning and such fatherly scourges. Made teachable by this thought, they found the church promised throughout all nations, not in human slanders and tales, but in the divine books; and they saw it fulfilled before their own eyes, and from the same books they no longer doubted that Christ, foretold there, is above the heavens, though they do not see him. Ought I then to have begrudged these men their salvation and called my colleagues back from this fatherly diligence, through which it has come about that we see many accusing their former blindness? Though they believed that Christ is exalted above the heavens without seeing him, they denied his glory over all the earth even while they saw it; yet the prophet embraced both in one sentence with such clarity, saying: “Be exalted above the heavens, O God, and your glory above all the earth.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 57:5 (56:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Vincentius, Rogatist bishop of Cartenna, successor of Rogatus. Its defence of the imperial laws against the Donatists is translated exactly as written. Quotation: Ps 57:5, 11 (56:6, 12 LXX); compare Ps 108:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.1 (CSEL 34.2:445–446; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-1).

## Letter 93.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:446–447
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Leaving the Donatists unchecked would be repaying evil for evil, as letting a delirious man run off a cliff would be; many former Circumcellions and lethargic Donatists now thank the Catholics.

### Latin text

Istos ergo atroces quondam inimicos nostros pacem et quietem nostram uariis uiolentiarum et insidiarum generibus grauiter infestantes si sic contemneremus et toleraremus, ut nihil omnino, quod ad eos terrendos ac corrigendos ualere posset, excogitaretur et argueretur a nobis, uere malum pro malo redderemus. si enim quisquam inimicum suum periculosis febribus phreneticum factum currere uideret in praeceps, nonne tunc potius malum pro malo redderet, si eum sic ire permitteret, quam si corripiendum ligandumque curaret? et tamen ei tunc molestissimus et aduersissimus uideretur, quando utilissimus et misericordissimus extitisset; sed plane salute reparata tanto uberius ei gratias ageret, quanto sibi eum minus pepercisse sensisset. o si possem tibi ostendere, ex ipsis Circumcellionibus quam multos iam catholicos manifestos habeamus damnantes suam pristinam uitam et miserabilem errorem. quo se arbitrabantur pro ecclesia dei facere, quicquid inquieta temeritate faciebant! qui tamen ad hanc sanitatem non perducerentur, nisi legum istarum, quae tibi displicent, uinculis tamquam phrenetici ligarentur. quid illud alterum genus morbi grauissimi eorum, qui turbulentam quidem audaciam non habebant, sed quadam uetusta socordia premebantur dicentes nobis: Verum quidem dicitis; non est, quod respondeatur; sed durum est nobis traditionem parentum relinquere? nonne salubriter regula temporalium molestiarum excutiendi erant, ut tamquam de somno lethargico emergerent et in salutem unitatis euigilarent? quam multi et ex ipsis nunc nobiscum gaudentes pristinum pondus perniciosi sui operis accusant et fatentur nos sibi molestos esse debuisse, ne tamquam mortifero somno ita morbo ueternosae consuetudinis interirent.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, we were so to disregard and tolerate these men, once our fierce enemies, who gravely troubled our peace and quiet with violence and ambushes of every kind, that we devised and urged nothing at all that might serve to frighten and correct them, we would truly be repaying evil for evil. For if someone saw his enemy, made delirious by a dangerous fever, running toward a precipice, would he not rather be repaying evil for evil if he let him go on so, than if he had him seized and bound? And yet at that moment he would seem to the man most troublesome and most hostile, when in fact he had shown himself most useful and most merciful; but once his health was restored, the man would thank him all the more warmly the less he felt he had been spared. Oh, if only I could show you how many of the Circumcellions themselves we now have as open Catholics, condemning their former life and their wretched error, in which they thought that whatever they did in their restless rashness they were doing for the church of God! Yet they would not have been brought to this soundness had they not been bound, like madmen, by the bonds of these laws that displease you. And what of that other kind of very grave disease, of those who had no turbulent boldness but were weighed down by a kind of long-standing sluggishness, who said to us: “What you say is true; there is no answer to it; but it is hard for us to give up the tradition of our parents”? Was it not wholesome that they should be shaken by the discipline of temporal troubles, so that they might come out of a sort of lethargic sleep and awaken to the salvation of unity? How many of these, too, now rejoicing with us, condemn the former weight of their ruinous course, and confess that we ought to have troubled them, lest they perish of the disease of inveterate habit as of a deadly sleep!

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Circumcellions were bands of Donatist rural militants. The comparison with binding a madman is Augustine's own; translated as written. Compare Rom 12:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.2 (CSEL 34.2:446–447; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-2).

## Letter 93.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:447–448
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Coercion fails with some, but it should be judged by the many it has helped; fear without teaching would be tyranny, teaching without fear too weak against habit.

### Latin text

At enim quibusdam ista non prosunt. numquid ideo neglegenda est medicina, quia nonnullorum est insanabilis pestilentia? tu non adtendis nisi eos, qui ita duri sunt, ut nec istam recipiant disciplinam. de talibus enim scriptum est: Frustra flagellaui filios uestros; disciplinam non receperunt. puto tamen, quia dilectione, non odio flagellati sunt. sed debes etiam tam multos adtendere, de quorum salute gaudemus. si enim terrerentur et non docerentur, inproba quasi dominatio uideretur. rursus si docerentur et non terrerentur, uetustate consuetudinis obdurati ad capessendam uiam salutis pigrius mouerentur, quando quidem multi, quod bene nouimus, reddita sibi ratione et manifestata diuinis testimoniis ueritate respondebant nobis cupere se in ecclesiae catholicae communionem transire, sed uiolentas perditorum hominum inimicitias formidare, quas quidem pro iustitia et pro aeterna uita utique contemnere debuerunt; sed talium infirmitas, donec firmi efficiantur, sustinenda est, non desperanda. nec obliuiscendum, quod ipse dominus adhuc infirmo Petro ait: Non potes me sequi modo, sequeris adiungitur, ut non solum tenebras erroris lux ueritatis expellat, uerum etiam malae consuetudinis uincula uis timoris abrumpat, de multorum, sicut dixi, salute laetamur benedicentium nobiscum et gratias agentium deo, quod sua pollicitatione completa, qua reges terrae Christo seruituros esse promisit, sic curauit morbidos, sic sanauit infirmos.

### English translation (Claude)

“But these things do some people no good.” Is medicine to be neglected, then, because some people's plague is incurable? You pay attention only to those who are so hard that they do not accept even this discipline. Of such it is written: “In vain have I scourged your children; they did not receive discipline.” Yet I think they were scourged out of love, not hatred. But you ought also to pay attention to the many over whose salvation we rejoice. For if they were frightened and not taught, it would seem a kind of wicked tyranny. Again, if they were taught and not frightened, hardened by long habit they would move more sluggishly to take the way of salvation; for many, as we well know, when the reason had been given them and the truth shown by divine testimonies, answered us that they wished to pass into the communion of the Catholic Church but feared the violent hostility of desperate men. They certainly ought to have despised that for the sake of righteousness and eternal life; but the weakness of such people must be borne until they are made strong, not despaired of. Nor must we forget what the Lord himself said to Peter while he was still weak: “You cannot follow me now; you will follow …” When [saving teaching] is joined [to useful fear], so that not only does the light of truth drive out the darkness of error but the force of fear also breaks the chains of bad habit, then, as I have said, we rejoice over the salvation of many who bless God with us and give him thanks that, having fulfilled his promise by which he promised that the kings of the earth would serve Christ, he has thus cured the diseased and thus healed the weak.

### Scripture references

- Jer 2:30: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:36: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Jer 2:30; John 13:36. Some words of the digital text appear to be lost after “sequeris” (John 13:36 continues “but you will follow afterward”); the following clause is translated by sense, with the missing words supplied in brackets from the context. The promise of kings serving Christ alludes to Ps 72:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.3 (CSEL 34.2:447–448; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-3).

## Letter 93.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:448–449
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love can strike and gentleness can deceive; God himself both comforts and chastises those he loves.

### Latin text

Non omnis, qui parcit, amicus est nec omnis, qui uerberat, inimicus. meliora sunt uulnera amici quam uoluntaria oscula inimici. melius est cum seueritate diligere quam cum lenitate decipere. utilius esurienti panis tollitur, si de cibo securus iustitiam neglegebat, quam esurienti panis frangitur, ut iniustitiae seductus adquiescat. et qui phreneticum ligat et qui lethargicum excitat, ambobus molestus ambos amat. quis nos potest amplius amare quam deus? et tamen nos non solum docere suauiter uerum etiam salubriter terrere non cessat. fomentis lenibus, quibus consolatur, saepe etiam mordacissimum medicamentum tribulationis adiungens exercet fame patriarchas etiam pios et religiosos, populum contumacem poenis grauioribus agitat, non aufert ab apostolo stimulum carnis tertio rogatus, ut uirtutem in infirmitate perficiat. diligamus etiam inimicos nostros, quia hoc iustum est et hoc praecepit deus, ut simus filii patris nostri, qui in caelis est, qui solem suum facit oriri super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos. sed sicut ista dona eius laudamus, ita etiam flagella eius in eos, quos diligit, cogitemus.

### English translation (Claude)

Not everyone who spares is a friend, nor is everyone who strikes an enemy. “Better are the wounds of a friend than the willing kisses of an enemy.” It is better to love with severity than to deceive with gentleness. It is more useful to take bread away from a hungry man, if, secure about his food, he was neglecting righteousness, than to break bread for a hungry man so that he may be seduced into consenting to unrighteousness. Both he who binds a madman and he who rouses a lethargic man trouble both of them and love both. Who can love us more than God? And yet he does not cease not only to teach us gently but also to frighten us for our good. To the soothing poultices with which he comforts he often adds the most stinging medicine of tribulation: he tries with famine even the godly and devout patriarchs; he harries a stubborn people with heavier punishments; he does not take away from the apostle the thorn in the flesh, though asked three times, so that he may perfect strength in weakness. Let us love even our enemies, for this is right and this God has commanded, so that we may be sons of our Father who is in heaven, who makes his sun rise on the good and the evil and sends rain on the just and the unjust. But as we praise these gifts of his, let us also consider his scourges on those whom he loves.

### Scripture references

- Prov 27:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:9: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:45: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 12:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Prov 27:6. Allusions: famine of the patriarchs (Gen 12:10; 26:1; 42–43), 2 Cor 12:7–9, Matt 5:44–45, Heb 12:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.4 (CSEL 34.2:448–449; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-4).

## Letter 93.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:449–450
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture shows compulsion toward the truth: the guests compelled to come in, Paul's blinding, and the Father's drawing.

### Latin text

Putas neminem debere cogi ad iustitiam, cum legas patrem familias dixisse seruis: Quoscumque inueneritis, cogite intrare, cum legas etiam ipsum primo Saulum postea Paulum ad cognoscendam et tenendam ueritatem magna uiolentia Christi cogentis esse compulsum, nisi forte cariorem putas hominibus esse pecuniam uel qualem libet possessionem quam lucem istam, quae oculis carpitur? hanc ille caelesti uoce prostratus subito amissam non recuperauit, nisi cum sanctae incorporaretur ecclesiae. et putas nullam uim adhibendam esse homini, ut ab erroris pernicie liberetur, cum ipsum deum, quo nemo nos utilius diligit, certissimis exemplis hoc facere uideas et Christum audias dicentem: Nemo ad me uenit, nisi quem pater adtraxerit, quod fit in cordibus omnium, qui se ad eum diuinae iracundiae timore conuertunt, et noueris aliquando furem auertendis pecoribus pabulum spargere et aliquando pastorem flagello ad gregem pecora errantia reuocare?

### English translation (Claude)

Do you think that no one ought to be compelled to righteousness, when you read that the householder said to his servants, “Whomever you find, compel them to come in”; when you read too that Saul, later Paul, was driven by the great violence of Christ compelling him to know and hold the truth? Unless perhaps you think that money or any possession is dearer to men than this light which is taken in by the eyes! Struck down by the heavenly voice, he lost it suddenly and did not recover it until he was incorporated into the holy church. And do you think that no force should be used on a man to free him from the ruin of error, when you see by the surest examples that God himself, than whom no one loves us more usefully, does this, and you hear Christ saying, “No one comes to me unless the Father has drawn him”, which happens in the hearts of all who turn to him through fear of the divine wrath; and when you know that sometimes a thief scatters fodder to lead cattle away, and sometimes a shepherd calls straying cattle back to the flock with a whip?

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:23: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 9:3: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:18: allusion, high confidence
- John 6:44: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Luke 14:23; John 6:44. Paul's conversion: Acts 9:3–18. Augustine's use of Luke 14:23 to justify compulsion is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.5 (CSEL 34.2:449–450; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/91-1/#p-93-5).

## Letter 93.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:450–451
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sarah's discipline of Hagar, Moses' punishments and Elijah's killing of false prophets show that like actions are judged by their motive.

### Latin text

Nonne contumacem ancillam data sibi potestate Sara potius affligebat? et utique non eam, quam superius beneficio suo matrem fecerat, crudeliter oderat, sed in ea superbiam salubriter edomabat. non autem ignoras, quod istae duae mulieres Sara et Agar et duo filii earum Isaac et Ismahel pro spiritalibus et carnalibus figurentur; et cum legamus ancillam et filium eius a Sara passos graues molestias. Paulus tamen apostolus dicit, quod ab Ismahele persecutionem sit passus Isaac: Sed sicut tunc, inquit, ille, qui erat secundum carnem. persequebatur eum, qui erat secundum spiritum, ita et nunc, ut, qui possunt, intellegant magis ecclesiam catholicam persecutionem pati superbia et impietate carnalium, quos temporalibus molestiis atque terroribus emendare conatur. quicquid ergo facit uera et legitima mater. etiam si asperum amarumque sentiatur. non malum pro malo reddit, sed bonum disciplinae expellendo malum iniquitatis adponit non odio nocendi sed dilectione sanandi. cum boni et mali eadem faciunt eademque patiuntur, non factis et poenis sed causis utique discernendi sunt. Pharao populum dei duris laboribus adterebat, Moyses eundem populum. impie agentem duris cohercitionibus affligebat; similia fecerunt, sed non similiter prodesse uoluerunt; ille dominatione inflatus, iste dilectione inflammatus est.. Iezabel occidit prophetas, Helias occidit pseudoprophetas; puto, quod diuersa sint merita facientium, diuersa passorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Did not Sarah, when the power was given her, rather afflict her stubborn maidservant? And she certainly did not cruelly hate her whom she had earlier made a mother by her own kindness; she was subduing her pride for her good. You are not unaware that these two women, Sarah and Hagar, and their two sons, Isaac and Ishmael, stand for the spiritual and the carnal; and though we read that the maidservant and her son suffered severe trouble from Sarah, the apostle Paul says that Isaac suffered persecution from Ishmael: “But just as then,” he says, “he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now”, so that those who can may understand that it is rather the Catholic Church that suffers persecution from the pride and ungodliness of the carnal, whom she tries to correct by temporal troubles and fears. Whatever, then, the true and lawful mother does, even if it is felt as harsh and bitter, she does not repay evil for evil, but applies the good of discipline to drive out the evil of iniquity, not from hatred that would harm but from love that would heal. When good and bad people do the same things and suffer the same things, they must surely be distinguished not by their deeds and penalties but by their motives. Pharaoh crushed the people of God with hard labour; Moses afflicted the same people with hard punishments when they acted ungodly. They did similar things, but they did not similarly intend good: the one was puffed up with domination, the other aflame with love. Jezebel killed prophets, Elijah killed false prophets; I think the deserts of the doers were different, and those of the sufferers different.

### Scripture references

- Gen 16:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:29: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 1:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 32:27: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Kgs 18:4: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 18:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Gen 16:6; Gal 4:22–29 (quotation of 4:29); Exod 1:11–14; Exod 32:27–28; 1 Kgs 18:4, 40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.6 (CSEL 34.2:450–451; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-6).

## Letter 93.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:451–452
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The same act differs by motive: the Father, Christ and Judas all handed Christ over, and Paul himself handed men over to Satan for their correction.

### Latin text

Aspice etiam tempora testamenti noui, quando iam ipsa mansuetudo caritatis non solum erat in corde seruanda uerum etiam in luce monstranda, quando Petri gladius in uaginam reuocatur a Christo et ostenditur non debuisse de uagina exeri nec pro Christo. legimus tamen non solum, quod ceciderunt Iudaei Paulum apostolum, uerum etiam quod ceciderunt et Graeci pro Paulo apostolo Sosthenen Iudaeum. nonne similitudo facti quasi utrosque coniungit et tamen eos causae dissimilitudo discernit? nempe deus proprio filio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum: nempe de ipso filio dicitur: Qui me dilexit et tradidit. semet ipsum pro me; nempe et de Iuda dicitur, quod introierit in eum satanas, ut traderet Christum. cum ergo et pater tradiderit filium suum et ipse Christus corpus suum et Iudas dominum suum, cur in hac traditione deus est pius et homo reus, nisi in re una, quam fecerunt, causa non una est, qua fecerunt? tres cruces uno in loco erant: in una latro liberandus, in alia latro damnandus, in medio Christus alterum liberaturus, alterum damnaturus. quid similius istis crucibus? quid dissimilius istis pendentibus? traditus est Paulus includendus et conligandus, sed quolibet custode carceris peior est utique satanas, cui tamen ipse Paulus tradidit hominem in interitum carnis, ut spiritus saluus sit in die domini Iesu. et hic quid dicimus? ecce mitiori tradidit crudelis traditor, crudeliori tradidit misericors traditor. discamus, fratres, in similitudine operum discernere animos operantium, ne clausis oculis calumniemur et beniuolos pro nocentibus accusemus. item cum ait idem apostolus tradidisse se quosdam satanae, ut discerent non blasphemare, malum pro malo reddidit, an potius malos etiam per malum emendare bonum opus esse iudicauit?

### English translation (Claude)

Look also at the times of the New Testament, when the very gentleness of love was not only to be kept in the heart but also to be shown in the light, when Peter's sword was called back into its sheath by Christ, and it was shown that it ought not to have been drawn from its sheath even for Christ. Yet we read not only that the Jews beat the apostle Paul, but also that the Greeks beat Sosthenes, a Jew, on behalf of the apostle Paul. Does not the likeness of the deed seem to join both together, and yet the unlikeness of the motive sets them apart? Indeed, God did not spare his own Son but handed him over for us all; indeed, of the Son himself it is said, “who loved me and handed himself over for me”; and indeed of Judas it is said that Satan entered into him so that he would hand Christ over. Since, then, the Father handed over his Son, and Christ himself his body, and Judas his Lord, why in this handing over is God holy and man guilty, unless it is that in the one act which they did the motive for which they did it was not one? There were three crosses in one place: on one a thief to be saved, on another a thief to be condemned, in the middle Christ, who would save the one and condemn the other. What is more alike than those crosses? What more unlike than those hanging on them? Paul was handed over to be shut up and bound; but Satan is surely worse than any jailer, and yet Paul himself handed a man over to him for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. And what do we say here? See, a cruel betrayer handed over to a milder one, a merciful one handed over to a crueller. Let us learn, brothers, to distinguish the intentions of the doers in the likeness of their works, lest with eyes closed we slander and accuse the well-meaning as harmful. Again, when the same apostle says that he handed certain men over to Satan so that they might learn not to blaspheme, did he repay evil for evil, or did he rather judge it a good work to correct evil men even through an evil?

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:52: allusion, high confidence
- John 18:11: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 21:32: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 18:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:32: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:20: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:27: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 23:33: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Matt 26:52; John 18:11; Acts 21:30–32; Acts 18:17 (Sosthenes); Rom 8:32; Gal 2:20; John 13:27; Luke 23:33, 39–43; 1 Cor 5:5; 1 Tim 1:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.7 (CSEL 34.2:451–452; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-7).

## Letter 93.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:452–453
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Persecution is praiseworthy or blameworthy according to its cause; the good have persecuted the bad for their correction.

### Latin text

Si semper esset laudabile persecutionem pati, sufficeret domino dicere: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur, nec adderet propter iustitiam. item si semper esset culpabile persecutionem facere, non scriptum esset in sanctis libris: Detrahentem proximo suo occulte hunc persequebar. aliquando ergo et qui eam patitur iniustus est et qui eam facit iustus est. sed plane semper et mali persecuti sunt bonos et boni persecuti sunt malos, illi nocendo per iniustitiam, illi consulendo per disciplinam; illi immaniter, illi temperanter; illi seruientes cupiditati, illi caritati. nam qui trucidat, non considerat, quem ad modum laniet; qui autem curat, considerat, quem ad modum secet; ille enim persequitur sanitatem, ille putredinem. occiderunt impii prophetas, occiderunt impios et prophetae; flagellauerunt Iudaei Christum, Iudaeos flagellauit et Christus: traditi sunt apostoli ab hominibus potestati humanae, tradiderunt et apostoli homines potestati satanae. in his omnibus quid adtenditur, nisi quis eorum pro ueritate, quis pro iniquitate, quis nocendi causa, quis emendandi?

### English translation (Claude)

If it were always praiseworthy to suffer persecution, it would have been enough for the Lord to say, “Blessed are those who suffer persecution”, and he would not have added “for righteousness' sake”. Again, if it were always blameworthy to persecute, it would not have been written in the holy books: “Him who secretly slanders his neighbour I persecuted.” Sometimes, then, he who suffers it is unjust and he who inflicts it is just. But clearly the bad have always persecuted the good and the good have always persecuted the bad: the former doing harm through injustice, the latter seeking their good through discipline; the former savagely, the latter with restraint; the former serving greed, the latter love. For one who butchers does not consider how he mangles, but one who heals considers how he cuts; the one pursues what is healthy, the other what is rotten. The ungodly killed prophets, and prophets killed the ungodly; the Jews scourged Christ, and Christ scourged the Jews; the apostles were handed over by men to human power, and the apostles handed men over to the power of Satan. In all these, what is to be looked at except who acted for truth, who for iniquity, who in order to harm, who in order to correct?

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 101:5 (100:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 2:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 5:10; Ps 101:5 (100:5 LXX). Christ scourging the Jews alludes to John 2:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.8 (CSEL 34.2:452–453; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-8).

## Letter 93.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:453–454
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Apostolic times had no Christian kings to appeal to; Nebuchadnezzar's persecution and later decree for God figure the church's two ages.

### Latin text

Non inuenitur exemplum in euangelicis et apostolicis litteris aliquid petitum a regibus terrae pro ecclesia contra inimicos ecclesiae. quis negat non inueniri? sed nondum implebatur illa prophetia: Et nunc, reges, intellegite et erudimini, qui iudicatis terram; seruite domino in timore. adhuc enim illud implebatur, quod in eodem psalmo paulo superius dicitur: Quare fremuerunt gentes et populi meditati sunt inania? adstiterunt reges terrae et principes conuenerunt in unum aduersus dominum et aduersus Christum eius. uerum tamen si facta praeterita in propheticis libris figurae fuerunt futurorum, in rege illo, qui appellabatur Nabuchodonosor, utrumque tempus figuratum est, et quod sub apostolis habuit et quod nunc habet ecclesia. temporibus itaque apostolorum et martyrum illud implebatur, quod figuratum est, quando rex memoratus pios et iustos cogebat adorare simulacrum et recusantes mittebat in flammam; nunc autem illud impletur, quod paulo post in eodem rege figuratum est, cum conuersus ad honorandum deum uerum decreuit in regno suo, ut, quicumque blasphemaret deum Sidrac, Misac et Abdenago, poenis debitis subiaceret. prius ergo tempus illius regis significabat priora tempora regum infidelium, quos passi sunt Christiani pro impiis; posterius uero tempus illius regis significauit tempora posteriorum regum iam fidelium, quos patiuntur impii pro Christianis.

### English translation (Claude)

“No example is found in the Gospels and the apostolic writings of anything asked of the kings of the earth for the church against the church's enemies.” Who denies that none is found? But that prophecy was not yet being fulfilled: “And now, O kings, understand; be instructed, you who judge the earth; serve the Lord in fear.” For what is said a little earlier in the same psalm was still being fulfilled: “Why have the nations raged and the peoples devised vain things? The kings of the earth stood up and the rulers gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ.” Yet if past events in the prophetic books were figures of things to come, both times were figured in the king called Nebuchadnezzar: what the church had under the apostles and what she has now. In the times of the apostles and martyrs, then, what was figured was being fulfilled when that king compelled the godly and righteous to worship an image and threw those who refused into the flames; but now what was figured a little later in the same king is being fulfilled, when, converted to honour the true God, he decreed in his kingdom that whoever blasphemed the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego should undergo the punishment due. The earlier time of that king, then, signified the earlier times of unbelieving kings, under whom Christians suffered in place of the ungodly; but the later time of that king signified the times of later kings, now believers, under whom the ungodly suffer in place of Christians.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:1: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:29 (3:96 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 2:10–11; Ps 2:1–2. References: Dan 3:1–23; Dan 3:29 (3:96 LXX and Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.9 (CSEL 34.2:453–454; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-9).

## Letter 93.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:454–455
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Penalties against Donatists (exile, fines) are milder than the capital laws against pagan sacrifice, for their aim is correction; like the Jews of Rom 10, they seek their own righteousness.

### Latin text

Sed plane in eis, qui sub nomine Christi errant seducti a peruersis, ne forte oues Christi sint errantes et ad gregem. aliter reuocandae sint, temperata seueritas et magis mansuetudo seruatur, ut cohercitione exiliorum atque damnorum admoneantur considerare. quid quare patiantur. et discant praeponere rumoribus et calumniis hominum scripturas, quas legunt. quis enim nostrum, quis uestrum non laudat leges ab imperatoribus datas aduersus sacrificia paganorum? et certe longe ibi poena seuerior constituta est; illius quippe impietatis capitale supplicium est. de uobis autem corripiendis atque cohercendis habita ratio est, qua potius admoneremini ab errore discedere. quam pro scelere puniremini. potest enim fortasse etiam de uobis dici. quod ait apostolus de Iudaeis: Testimonium illis perhibeo, quia zelum dei habent sed non secundum scientiam. ignorantes enim dei iustitiam et suam iustitiam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. quid enim aliud et uos quam uestram iustitiam uultis constituere. quando non dicitis iustificari nisi eos, qui a uobis potuerint baptizari? in hac ergo apostolica sententia, quam de Iudaeis protulit, hoc distatis a Iudaeis, quod uos habetis sacramenta Christiana, quibus illi adhuc carent. ceterum ad hoc, quod: ait: Ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere, et quod zelum dei habent sed non secundum scientiam, pares estis omnino exceptis dumtaxat illis, quicumque in uobis sunt scientes, quid uerum sit, et pro animositate suae peruersitatis contra ueritatem etiam sibi notissimam dimicantes. horum quippe impietas etiam idolatriam forsitan superat. sed quia non facile conuinci possunt — in animo namque latet hoc malum —, omnes tamquam non a nobis nimis alieni leniore seueritate cohercemini. et hoc quidem uel de omnibus haereticis, qui Christianis sacramentis inbuuntur et a Christi ueritate siue unitate dissentiunt. uel Donatistis omnibus dixerim.

### English translation (Claude)

But clearly, in the case of those who go astray under the name of Christ, led astray by perverse men, lest perhaps they be Christ's straying sheep who must be called back to the flock some other way, a tempered severity, and rather gentleness, is observed, so that by the constraint of exile and fines they may be warned to consider why they suffer, and learn to prefer the Scriptures they read to the rumours and slanders of men. For which of us, which of you, does not praise the laws issued by the emperors against the sacrifices of the pagans? And certainly a far severer penalty is laid down there: that ungodliness carries the death penalty. But in correcting and restraining you, the aim was rather that you should be warned to depart from error than punished for a crime. For perhaps what the apostle says of the Jews can be said of you too: “I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. For, being ignorant of God's righteousness and seeking to establish their own righteousness, they did not submit to the righteousness of God.” For what else do you want but to establish your own righteousness, when you say that none are justified except those whom you have been able to baptize? In this sentence of the apostle that he spoke about the Jews, you differ from the Jews in that you have the Christian sacraments, which they still lack. But as to what he says, “being ignorant of God's righteousness and seeking to establish their own”, and that they have a zeal for God but not according to knowledge, you are entirely alike, except only those among you who know what is true and fight, from the animosity of their perversity, even against a truth well known to them. Their ungodliness perhaps surpasses even idolatry. But since they cannot easily be convicted, for this evil lies hidden in the mind, you are all restrained by a milder severity, as people not too far removed from us. And this I would say either of all heretics who are imbued with the Christian sacraments and dissent from the truth or unity of Christ, or of all the Donatists.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Rom 10:2–3. The comparison with the Jews and the remarks on the death penalty for pagan sacrifice are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.10 (CSEL 34.2:454–455; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-10).

## Letter 93.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:455–456
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Rogatists seem milder only because they are too few to be violent, and their founder Rogatus himself went to law over property.

### Latin text

Quod autem ad uos adtinet, qui non solum cum illis communiter Donatistae a Donato uerum etiam proprie Rogatistae a Rogato appellamini, mitiores quidem esse uidemini, quia Circumcellionum immanissimis gregibus non saeuitis; sed nulla bestia, si neminem uulneret, propterea mansueta dicitur, quia dentes et ungues non habet. saeuire uos nolle dicitis; ego non posse arbitror. ita enim estis numero exigui, ut mouere uos contra aduersarias uobis multitudines non audeatis, etsi cupiatis. sed ponamus uos etiam nolle, quod non ualetis, ponamus uos euangelicam sententiam, qua scriptum est: Si quis tibi uoluerit tunicam tollere et iudicio tecum contendere, dimitte illi et pallium, sic intellegere, sic tenere, ut persequentibus uos non solum nulla iniuria uerum etiam iure nullo resistendum putetis: hunc certe intellectum Rogatus auctor uester aut non habuit aut non impleuit, qui de nescio quibus rebus. ut dicitis, uestris acerrima perseuerantia etiam forensi disceptatione conflixit. cui si diceretur: Quis umquam apostolorum in causa fidei res suas iudicio publico defendit? sicut tu in epistula posuisti: Quis umquam apostolorum in causa fidei res alienas inuasit? nullum quidem in diuinis litteris huius facti reperiret exemplum; sed tamen forte inueniret aliquam ueram defensionem, si ueram ecclesiam retineret, non sub ecclesiae uerae nomine inpudenter aliquid possideret.,

### English translation (Claude)

As for you, who are called not only Donatists after Donatus, in common with them, but also, in particular, Rogatists after Rogatus, you do seem milder, because you do not rage with the savage gangs of the Circumcellions. But no beast is called tame because it wounds no one, when it has no teeth or claws. You say you do not wish to rage; I think you cannot. For you are so few in number that you would not dare to move against the multitudes opposed to you, even if you wished. But let us suppose that you do not even wish what you are unable to do; let us suppose that you so understand and so hold the Gospel saying, in which it is written, “If anyone wishes to take your tunic and go to law with you, let him have your cloak as well”, that you think those who persecute you are to be resisted not only with no injury but even with no legal right. Certainly Rogatus, your founder, either did not have this understanding or did not fulfil it, for he fought with the most stubborn persistence, even in litigation in the courts, over some property or other that you say was yours. If it were said to him, “Which of the apostles ever defended his property in a public court in a matter of faith?”, just as you put it in your letter, “Which of the apostles ever seized other people's property in a matter of faith?”, he would indeed find no example of this deed in the divine writings; but perhaps he would find some true defence, if he held the true church and did not shamelessly possess anything under the name of the true church.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:40: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 5:40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.11 (CSEL 34.2:455–456; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-11).

## Letter 93.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:456–457
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists themselves petitioned Julian the Apostate, flatteringly calling him a man with whom justice alone had a place.

### Latin text

Quod autem pertinet ad terrenarum potestatum iussa contra schismaticos aut haereticos uel impetranda uel exerenda, illi quidem, a quibus uos separastis, acerrimi fuerunt et contra uos, quantum audire potuimus, et contra Maximianistas. quod gestorum etiam certis documentis probamus; sed tamen nondum ab eis separati eratis, quando Iuliano imperatori in sua petitione dixerunt, quod apud eum sola iustitia locum haberet, quem certe apostatam nouerant et idolatriis deditum sic uidebant, ut aut iustitiam esse idolatriam faterentur aut se scelerate mentitos negare non possent, ut apud eum dicerent solam locum habere iustitiam, apud quem magnum locum cernerent habere idolatriam. sed fuerit error in uerbo. de ipso facto quid dicis? si nihil iustum ab imperatore petendum est, cur a Iuliano petitum est, quod iustum putatum est?

### English translation (Claude)

As for asking for or carrying out orders of the earthly powers against schismatics or heretics, those from whom you separated were very fierce, both against you, as far as we have been able to hear, and against the Maximianists, which we prove by sure documents from the public records. Yet you had not yet separated from them when they said to the emperor Julian in their petition that with him justice alone had a place, though they knew him to be an apostate and saw him so given over to idolatry that either they would have to admit that idolatry is justice or they could not deny that they had lied wickedly, saying that justice alone had a place with a man with whom they saw idolatry had a great place. But let that be a slip of the tongue. What do you say about the deed itself? If nothing just is to be asked of an emperor, why was what was thought just asked of Julian?

### Translation notes

- The Maximianists were a schism within the Donatist church (393). The Donatist petition to Julian (361–362) is quoted again in later anti-Donatist writings.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.12 (CSEL 34.2:456–457; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-12).

## Letter 93.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:457–458
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' forebears first accused Caecilian before Constantine and, though defeated before bishops and the emperor, refused peace.

### Latin text

An per hoc petendum est, ut sua quisque recuperet, non ut aliquem, quo ab imperatore coherceatur, accuset? interim et in suarum rerum recipiendarum repetitione ab apostolicis exemplis receditur, quia hoc fecisse nemo inuenitur illorum. sed tamen cum maiores uestri ipsum Caecilianum tunc ecclesiae Carthaginiensis episcopum, cui tamquam criminoso communicare noluerunt, apud principem Constantinum per Anulinum proconsulem accusauerunt, non res suas amissas repetiuerunt, sed innocentem, sicut existimamus et sicut ipse iudiciorum exitus docuit, calumniose appetierunt, quo quid sceleratius ab eis fieri potuit? si autem, sicut falso arbitramini, uere criminosum iudicandum terrenis potestatibus tradiderunt, quid nobis obicitis, quod uestrorum praesumptio primitus fecit? quod eos non argueremus, quia fecerunt, si non animo inuido et noxio sed emendandi et corrigendi uoluntate fecissent. uos tamen indubitanter arguimus, quibus crimen uidetur de inimicis communionis nostrae Christiano imperatori aliquid conqueri, cum libellus a maioribus uestris Anulino proconsuli datus Constantino imperatori mittendus ita suprascriptus sit: Libellus ecclesiae catholicae criminum Caeciliani traditus a parte Maiorini. illos autem hinc magis arguimus, quia, cum apud imperatorem ultro Caecilianum accusassent, quem primo utique apud collegas transmarinos conuincere debuerunt, ipso imperatore longe ordinatius agente, ut episcoporum causam ad se delatam ad episcopos mitteret. nec uicti pacem cum fratribus habere uoluerunt, sed rursus ad eundem imperatorem uenerunt, rursus non Caecilianum tantum uerum etiam datos sibi episcopos iudices apud terrenum regem accusauerunt, rursus ab alio episcopali iudicio ad eundem imperatorem appellauerunt nec eo ipso inter partes cognoscente atque iudicante uel ueritati uel paci cedendum esse duxerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Or is it to be asked on the ground that each may recover his own property, not that one may accuse someone in order to have him restrained by the emperor? Even in reclaiming one's own property one departs from the example of the apostles, for none of them is found to have done this. But when your forebears accused Caecilian himself, then bishop of the church of Carthage, with whom they refused to communicate as a criminal, before the emperor Constantine through the proconsul Anulinus, they were not reclaiming property they had lost; they were slanderously attacking an innocent man, as we believe and as the outcome of the trials itself showed. What could they have done more wicked than that? But if, as you falsely suppose, they handed over a man who really was a criminal to be judged by the earthly powers, why do you reproach us with what the presumption of your own people did first? We would not blame them for having done it, if they had done it not with an envious and harmful mind but with the will to amend and correct. You, however, we blame without hesitation, who think it a crime to make any complaint to a Christian emperor about the enemies of our communion, when the petition given by your forebears to the proconsul Anulinus, to be sent to the emperor Constantine, was headed thus: “Petition of the Catholic Church concerning the crimes of Caecilian, submitted by the party of Majorinus.” And we blame them still more for this: that though they of their own accord accused Caecilian before the emperor, whom they certainly ought first to have convicted before their colleagues overseas, and though the emperor acted far more properly in sending the case of bishops, brought before him, to bishops, they would not, when defeated, have peace with their brothers; they came again to the same emperor, again accused before an earthly king not only Caecilian but also the bishops given them as judges, again appealed from another episcopal judgment to the same emperor, and even when he himself heard and judged between the parties, they did not think they should yield either to truth or to peace.

### Translation notes

- Caecilian, bishop of Carthage from ca. 311; Majorinus was the rival bishop set up against him, Donatus's predecessor. The petition through the proconsul Anulinus (313) is preserved in Augustine, Ep. 88.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.13 (CSEL 34.2:457–458; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-13).

## Letter 93.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:458–459
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Constantine first decreed confiscation against those who resisted unity after failing to prove their charges; later emperors follow his sentence.

### Latin text

Quid autem aliud statueret Constantinus aduersus Caecilianum et socios eius, si essent uestris maioribus accusantibus uicti, quam quod statuit in eos ipsos, qui cum ultro accusassent nec ea, quae intendebant, probare potuissent. noluerunt ueritati consentire nec uicti? ille quippe imperator primus constituit in hac causa, ut res conuictorum et unitati peruicaciter resistentium fisco uindicarentur. sed uidelicet si uestris maioribus accusantibus atque superantibus contra communionem Caeciliani imperator tale aliquid decreuisset. prouisores ecclesiae, defensores pacis et unitatis nominari uelletis. cum uero in eos, qui ultro accusantes nihil probare potuerunt nec oblato sibi gremio pacis, quo correcti exciperentur. consentire uoluerunt, ab imperatoribus talia decernuntur, indignum facinus clamitatur, neminem ad unitatem esse cogendum, malum pro malo nemini reddendum esse contenditur. quid est aliud quam id, quod de uobis quidam scripsit: Quod uolumus, sanctum est? et nunc non erat magnum neque difficile considerare atque cogitare Constantini iudicium atque sententiam contra uos uigere. quae uestris maioribus Caecilianum apud imperatorem totiens accusantibus et non conuincentibus aduersus uos promulgata est, eamque necessario sequi ceteros imperatores, maxime catholicos Christianos, quotiens de uobis aliquid agere uestrae obstinationis necessitas cogit.

### English translation (Claude)

And what else would Constantine have decreed against Caecilian and his associates, if they had been defeated when your forebears accused them, than what he decreed against those very men who, having accused of their own accord and been unable to prove their charges, would not yield to the truth even when defeated? For that emperor was the first to decree in this case that the property of those convicted and stubbornly resisting unity should be confiscated to the treasury. But of course, if your forebears had accused and prevailed, and the emperor had decreed something of the kind against the communion of Caecilian, you would want to be called guardians of the church, defenders of peace and unity. But when such things are decreed by emperors against those who, accusing of their own accord, could prove nothing and would not consent when the bosom of peace was offered them, in which they would be received on correction, then it is shouted that this is an outrage, and it is argued that no one is to be compelled to unity, that evil is to be repaid to no one for evil. What is this but what someone wrote of you: “What we want is holy”? And now it was not a great or difficult thing to consider and reflect that the judgment and sentence of Constantine against you is still in force, which was issued against you when your forebears so often accused Caecilian before the emperor and failed to convict him; and that the other emperors, especially Catholic Christians, necessarily follow it whenever the necessity created by your obstinacy compels them to take any action concerning you.

### Translation notes

- The saying “What we want is holy” is quoted from an unnamed writer (in Augustine's other works it is attributed to Tyconius, a Donatist; here unnamed).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.14 (CSEL 34.2:458–459; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-14).

## Letter 93.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:459–461
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The worldwide church could not be guilty of crimes it never knew; the bad are to be tolerated for the sake of the good, as the prophets, Christ, the apostles and Cyprian did.

### Latin text

Facile erat ista cogitare, ut uobis ipsis aliquando diceretis: Si Caecilianus uel innocens fuit uel nocens conuinci non potuit, quid in hoc negotio tam longe lateque diffusa societas Christiana peccauit? cur orbi Christiano non licuit ignorare, quod non potuerunt, qui accusauerant, demonstrare? cur illi, quos Christus in agro suo, id est in hoc mundo seminauit et inter zizania crescere usque ad messem praecepit, cur tot milia fidelium in omnibus gentibus, quorum multitudinem stellis caeli et harenae maris dominus comparauit, quos in semine Abrahae benedicendos promisit et reddidit, propterea negantur esse Christiani, quia in hac causa, in qua discutienda non interfuerunt, iudicibus potius suo periculo iudicantibus quam uictis litigatoribus credere maluerunt? certe nullius crimen maculat nescientem. quo modo fideles toto orbe diffusi crimen traditorum cognoscere poterant, quod accusatores, etiam si nouerant, tamen eis ostendere non ualebant? hos ergo ab hoc crimine innocentes esse nempe ipsa ignorantia facillime ostendit. cur ergo innocentes falsis criminibus accusantur. quia crimina aliena seu falsa seu uera nescierunt? quis locus innocentiae reseruatur. si crimen est proprium nescire crimen alienum? porro si tot gentium populos ipsa ignorantia, sicut dictum est, innocentes ostendit, quam magnum crimen est ab istorum innocentium communione separari? nam et facta nocentium, quae innocentibus demonstrari uel ab innocentibus credi non possunt, non inquinant quemquam, si propter innocentium consortium etiam cognita sustinentur. non enim propter malos boni deserendi, sed propter bonos mali tolerandi sunt, sicut tolerarunt prophetae, contra quos tanta dicebant, nec communionem sacramentorum illius populi relinquebant, sicut ipse dominus nocentem Iudam usque ad condignum eius exitum tolerauit et eum sacram cenam cum innocentibus communicare permisit, sicut tolerarunt apostoli eos, qui per inuidiam, quod ipsius diaboli uitium est, Christum adnuntiabant, sicut tolerauit Cyprianus collegarum auaritiam, quam secundum apostolum appellat idolatriam. postremo quicquid tunc inter illos episcopos gestum est, etiam si forte ab aliquibus eorum sciebatur, si non sit acceptio personarum, nunc ab omnibus ignoratur. cur ergo non ab omnibus pax amatur? haec facillime cogitare possetis aut fortasse etiam cogitatis. sed melius erat. ut amaretis possessiones terrenas, quas timendo perdere cognitae ueritati consentiretis, quam ut amaretis uanissimam hominum gloriam, quam uos putatis perdere, si cognitae ueritati consenseritis.

### English translation (Claude)

It was easy to reflect on these things, so that you might at some time say to yourselves: “If Caecilian was either innocent or, if guilty, could not be convicted, how has the Christian society, spread so far and wide, sinned in this matter? Why was the Christian world not permitted to be ignorant of what the accusers could not prove? Why are those whom Christ sowed in his field, that is, in this world, and commanded to grow among the weeds until the harvest, why are so many thousands of believers in all nations, whose multitude the Lord compared to the stars of heaven and the sand of the sea, whom he promised would be blessed in the seed of Abraham and has made good his promise, denied to be Christians on this account: that in this case, at whose examination they were not present, they chose to believe the judges, who judged at their own peril, rather than the defeated litigants?” Certainly no one's crime stains one who does not know of it. How could the believers spread throughout the world know the crime of the traditors, which the accusers, even if they knew it, were unable to show them? That they are innocent of this crime their very ignorance most easily shows. Why then are the innocent accused of false crimes because they did not know of other people's crimes, whether false or true? What room is left for innocence, if it is one's own crime not to know another's crime? Further, if, as has been said, their very ignorance shows the peoples of so many nations to be innocent, how great a crime it is to separate from the communion of these innocent people! For the deeds of the guilty, which cannot be shown to the innocent or believed by the innocent, stain no one, even if, once known, they are borne for the sake of fellowship with the innocent. For the good are not to be deserted because of the bad, but the bad are to be tolerated because of the good: as the prophets tolerated them, against whom they said so much, and yet did not leave the communion of the sacraments of that people; as the Lord himself tolerated guilty Judas until his fitting end and allowed him to share the holy supper with the innocent; as the apostles tolerated those who proclaimed Christ out of envy, which is the vice of the devil himself; as Cyprian tolerated the avarice of his colleagues, which, following the apostle, he calls idolatry. Finally, whatever was done then among those bishops, even if perhaps some of them knew of it, is now, without respect of persons, unknown to all. Why then is peace not loved by all? You could very easily reflect on these things, or perhaps you even do reflect on them. But it would be better for you to love your earthly possessions, so that through fear of losing them you would consent to the truth you know, than to love the emptiest glory of men, which you think you will lose if you consent to the truth you know.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:17: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:5: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 6 (On the Lapsed): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Traditors” (traditores) were clergy accused of handing over the Scriptures in the persecution of 303–305. References: Matt 13:24–30, 38; Gen 22:17–18; Phil 1:15; Col 3:5 (avarice as idolatry); Cyprian, On the Lapsed 6 (bishops' avarice).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.15 (CSEL 34.2:459–461; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-15).

## Letter 93.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:461
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: What matters is what one is compelled to; many cities once Donatist became sincerely Catholic through fear of the imperial laws.

### Latin text

Vides itaque iam, ut opinor, non esse considerandum, quod quisque cogitur, sed quale sit illud, quo cogitur, utrum bonum an malum. non quo quisque bonus esse possit inuitus, sed timendo, quod non uult, pati uel relinquit impedientem animositatem uel ignoratam compellitur cognoscere ueritatem, ut timens uel respuat falsum, de quo contendebat, uel quaerat uerum, quod nesciebat, et uolens iam teneat, quod nolebat. superfluo fortasse hoc diceretur quibuslibet uerbis, si non tam multis ostenderetur exemplis. non illos aut illos homines sed multas ciuitates uidemus fuisse Donatistas, nunc esse catholicas, detestari uehementer diabolicam separationem, diligere ardenter unitatem. quae tamen timoris huius, qui tibi displicet, occasionibus catholicae factae sunt per leges imperatorum a Constantino, apud quem primum uestri ultro Caecilianum accusauerunt, usque ad praesentes imperatores, qui iudicium illius, quem uestri elegerunt, quem iudicibus episcopis praetulerunt, iustissime contra uos custodiendum esse decernunt.

### English translation (Claude)

You see, then, I think, that what must be considered is not whether someone is compelled, but what that is to which he is compelled, whether good or bad. Not that anyone can be good against his will; but through fear of suffering what he does not wish, he either gives up the animosity that stood in his way or is driven to know a truth of which he was ignorant, so that through fear he either rejects the falsehood he was contending for or seeks the truth he did not know, and now willingly holds what he did not want. It would perhaps be superfluous to say this in any words at all, if it were not shown by so many examples. We see that not this or that man but many cities were Donatist and are now Catholic, vehemently detest the diabolical separation, and ardently love unity. Yet they became Catholic on the occasion of this fear that displeases you, through the laws of the emperors, from Constantine, before whom your people first accused Caecilian of their own accord, down to the present emperors, who decree most justly that the judgment of him whom your people chose, whom they preferred to the episcopal judges, is to be upheld against you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.16 (CSEL 34.2:461; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-16).

## Letter 93.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:461–462
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine admits he first opposed compulsion, but was persuaded by the conversion of his own city and others through fear of the laws.

### Latin text

His ergo exemplis a collegis meis mihi propositis cessi. nam mea primitus sententia non erat nisi neminem ad unitatem Christi esse cogendum, uerbo esse agendum, disputatione pugnandum, ratione uincendum, ne fictos catholicos haberemus, quos apertos haereticos noueramus. sed haec opinio mea non contradicentium uerbis sed demonstrantium superabatur exemplis. nam primo mihi opponebatur ciuitas mea, quae cum tota esset in parte Donati, ad unitatem catholicam legum imperialium timore conuersa est, quam nunc uidemus ita huius uestrae animositatis perniciem detestari, ut in ea numquam fuisse credatur; ita aliae multae, quae mihi nominatim commemorabantur, ut ipsis rebus agnoscerem etiam in hac causa recte intellegi posse, quod scriptum est: Da sapienti occasionem et sapientior erit. quam multi enim, quod certo scimus, iam uolebant esse catholici manifestissima ueritate commoti et offensionem suorum reuerendo cotidie differebant! quam multos non ueritas, qua numquam praesumpsistis, sed obduratae consuetudinis graue uinculum conligabat, ut in eis compleretur diuina illa sententia: Verbis non emendabitur seruus durus; si enim et intellexerit, non oboediet! quam multi propterea putabant ueram ecclesiam esse partem Donati, quia eos ad cognoscendam catholicam ueritatem securitas torpidos, fastidiosos pigrosque faciebat! quam multis aditum intrandi obserabant rumores maledicorum, qui nescio quid aliud nos in altare dei ponere iactitabant! quam multi nihil interesse credentes, in qua quisque parte Christianus sit, ideo permanebant in parte Donati. quia ibi nati erant et eos inde discedere atque ad catholicam transire nemo cogebat!

### English translation (Claude)

So I yielded to these examples put before me by my colleagues. For my opinion originally was that no one should be compelled to the unity of Christ, that one should act by word, fight by discussion, conquer by reason, lest we have pretended Catholics whom we had known as open heretics. But this opinion of mine was overcome, not by the words of those who contradicted it, but by the examples of those who demonstrated otherwise. For first my own city was set against me, which, though it had been wholly in the party of Donatus, was converted to Catholic unity by fear of the imperial laws, and which we now see detesting the ruin of this animosity of yours so much that one would think it had never been in it. So too many others, which were mentioned to me by name, so that I recognized from the facts themselves that what is written can rightly be understood in this case too: “Give a wise man an opportunity and he will be wiser.” For how many, as we know for certain, already wished to be Catholics, moved by the most manifest truth, and put it off from day to day out of regard for offending their own people! How many were bound, not by the truth, on which you never relied, but by the heavy chain of hardened habit, so that in them that divine saying was fulfilled: “A hard servant will not be corrected by words; for even if he understands, he will not obey”! How many thought the party of Donatus was the true church because security made them sluggish, disdainful and lazy about learning the Catholic truth! For how many the rumours of slanderers, who kept claiming that we place I know not what else on the altar of God, barred the way in! How many, believing that it makes no difference in which party one is a Christian, remained in the party of Donatus because they had been born there and no one compelled them to leave it and pass over to the Catholic Church!

### Scripture references

- Prov 9:9: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 29:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's account of his change of mind on coercion is translated exactly. Quotations: Prov 9:9; Prov 29:19. “My own city” is Hippo Regius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.17 (CSEL 34.2:461–462; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-17).

## Letter 93.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:462–463
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Converts give thanks in various ways that the fear of the laws moved them out of delay, habit, ignorance and false rumour into unity.

### Latin text

His omnibus harum legum terror, quibus promulgandis reges domino seruiunt in timore, ita profuit, ut nunc alii dicant: clam hoc uolebamus; sed deo gratias, qui nobis occasionem praebuit iam iamque faciendi et dilationum morulas amputauit, alii dicant: Hoc esse uerum iam sciebamus, sed nescio qua consuetudine tenebamur; gratias domino, qui uincula nostra disrupit et nos ad pacis uinculum transtulit, alii dicant: Nesciebamus hic esse ueritatem nec eam discere uolebamus; sed nos ad eam cognoscendam metus fecit intentos, quo timuimus, ne forte sine ullis rerum aeternarum lucris damno rerum temporalium feriremur; gratias domino, qui neglegentiam nostram stimulo terroris excussit, ut saltem solliciti quaereremus, quod securi numquam nosse curauimus), alii dicant: Nos falsis rumoribus terrebamur intrare, quos falsos esse nesciremus, nisi intraremus, nec intraremus, nisi cogeremur; gratias domino, qui trepidationem nostram flagello abstulit, expertos docuit, quam uana et inania de ecclesia sua mendax fama iactauerit;. hinc iam credimus et illa falsa esse, quae auctores huius haeresis criminati sunt, quando posteri eorum tam falsa et peiora finxerunt alii dicant: Putabamus quidem nihil interesse, ubi fidem Christi teneremus; sed gratias domino, qui nos a diuisione collegit et hoc uni deo congruere, ut in unitate colatur, ostendit.

### English translation (Claude)

To all these the terror of these laws, in promulgating which kings serve the Lord in fear, has been so beneficial that now some say: “We wanted this secretly; but thanks be to God, who has given us the occasion to do it at once and has cut off the little delays of postponement.” Others say: “We already knew this was the truth, but we were held by some habit or other; thanks be to the Lord, who has broken our bonds and brought us over to the bond of peace.” Others say: “We did not know that the truth was here, nor did we wish to learn it; but fear made us intent on knowing it, the fear that we might be struck by the loss of temporal things without any gain of eternal things; thanks be to the Lord, who shook off our negligence with the goad of terror, so that at least when anxious we sought what when secure we never cared to know.” Others say: “We were frightened of entering by false rumours, which we would not have known to be false unless we entered, and we would not have entered unless we were compelled; thanks be to the Lord, who took away our trepidation with the scourge, and taught us by experience how vain and empty were the things that lying report spread about his church; from this we now believe that those things too are false which the founders of this heresy charged, since their successors have invented things so false and worse.” Others say: “We thought it made no difference where we held the faith of Christ; but thanks be to the Lord, who has gathered us from division and shown that it befits the one God to be worshipped in unity.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Kings serving the Lord in fear: Ps 2:11. Bond of peace: Eph 4:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.18 (CSEL 34.2:462–463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-18).

## Letter 93.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:463–464
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refuses to hinder the laws that gather Christ's sheep, contrasting the Donatists' care for their own rights with their denial of Christ's inheritance.

### Latin text

His ego dominicis lucris impediendis ad contradicendum me opponerem collegis meis, ne in montibus et collibus uestris, id est in tumoribus superbiae uestrae Christi oues errantes in pacis ouile colligerentur, ubi est unus grex et unus pastor? ita sane huic prouisioni contradicere debui, ne res, quas dicitis uestras, perderetis et securi Christum proscriberetis? ut iure Romano testamenta conderetis et iure diuino patribus conditum testamentum, ubi scriptum est: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes, calumniosis criminationibus rumperetis? ut in emptionibus et uenditionibus liberos contractus haberetis et uobis diuidere, quod Christus emit uenditus, auderetis? ut, quod quisque uestrum cuiquam donasset, ualeret et, quod donauit deus deorum a solis ortu usque ad occasum uocatis filiis, non ualeret? ut de terra corporis uestri in exilium non mitteremini et de regno sanguinis sui a mari usque ad mare et a flumine usque ad terminos orbis terrae Christum. exulem facere conaremini? immo uero seruiant reges terrae Christo etiam leges ferendo pro Christo. maiores uestri Caecilianum et socios eius regibus terrae puniendos falsis criminibus obiecerunt; conuertantur leones ad comminuenda ossa calumniantium nec Danihel ipse intercedat innocens comprobatus et de lacu, quo illi pereunt, liberatus; qui enim parat proximo suo foueam, ipse iustius cadet in eam.

### English translation (Claude)

Should I set myself to contradict my colleagues so as to hinder these gains for the Lord, so that Christ's straying sheep on your mountains and hills, that is, on the swellings of your pride, should not be gathered into the fold of peace, where there is one flock and one shepherd? Ought I really to have opposed this provision so that you should not lose the property you call yours, and might proscribe Christ in security? So that you might make wills under Roman law, and by slanderous charges break the will made under divine law to the fathers, where it is written, “In your seed shall all nations be blessed”? So that you might have free contracts in buying and selling, and dare to divide what Christ bought when he was sold? So that what any of you had given to anyone should be valid, and what the God of gods has given to his children, called from the rising of the sun to its setting, should not be valid? So that you should not be sent into exile from the land of your body, and you might try to make Christ an exile from the kingdom of his blood, from sea to sea and from the river to the ends of the earth? No indeed: let the kings of the earth serve Christ by making laws for Christ too. Your forebears exposed Caecilian and his associates to the kings of the earth to be punished on false charges; let the lions be turned to crush the bones of the slanderers, and let not Daniel himself intercede, proved innocent and delivered from the den in which they perish; for he who prepares a pit for his neighbour will more justly fall into it himself.

### Scripture references

- Ezek 34:6: allusion, medium confidence
- John 10:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:20: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:24: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 26:27: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ezek 34:6; John 10:16; Gen 22:18; 1 Cor 6:20; Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX); Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX); Ps 72:11; Dan 6:24; Prov 26:27. The image of the lions turned on the slanderers is Augustine's application of Daniel; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.19 (CSEL 34.2:463–464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-19).

## Letter 93.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:464–466
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The civil power is from God; Vincentius does not do good, for at Cartenna with ten followers he denies the worldwide church foretold by the prophets.

### Latin text

Eripe te, frater, dum in hac carne uiuis, ab ira, quae uentura est pertinacibus et superbis. terror temporalium potestatum quando ueritatem oppugnat, iustis fortibus gloriosa probatio est, infirmis periculosa temptatio; quando autem ueritatem praedicat, errantibus cordatis utilis admonitio est, insensatis inutilis afflictio. non est tamen potestas nisi. a deo; qui autem resistit potestati, dei ordinationi resistit; principes enim non sunt timori bono operi sed malo. uis autem non timere potestatem, bonum fac et habebis laudem ex illa. siue enim potestas ueritati fauens aliquem corrigat, laudem habet ex illa, qui fuerit emendatus; siue inimica ueritati in aliquem saeuiat, laudem habet ex illa, qui uictor fuerit coronatus. tu autem non bonum facis, ut timere non debeas potestatem, nisi forte bonum est sedere et non aduersus fratrem detrahere sed aduersus fratres omnes in omnibus gentibus constitutos. quibus testimonium perhibent prophetae, Christus, apostoli, cum legitur: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes, cum legitur: Ab ortu solis usque ad occasum sacrificium mundum offertur nomini meo, quoniam glorificatum est nomen meum in gentibus, dicit dominus — audi: dicit dominus, non: dicit Donatus aut Rogatus aut Vincentius aut Hilarius aut Ambrosius aut Augustinus sed: dicit dominus —, cum legitur: Et benedicentur in eo omnes tribus terrae, omnes gentes magnificabunt eum. benedictus dominus deus Israhel, qui facit mirabilia solus, et benedictum nomen gloriae eius in aeternum et in saeculum saeculi. et replebitur gloria eius omnis terra. fiat, fiat. et tu sedes Cartennis et cum decem Rogatistis, qui remansistis, dicis: (Non fiat, non fiat).

### English translation (Claude)

Rescue yourself, brother, while you live in this flesh, from the wrath that will come upon the obstinate and proud. When the terror of temporal powers attacks the truth, it is a glorious testing for the strong and righteous and a dangerous temptation for the weak; but when it proclaims the truth, it is a useful warning for those who err but have sense, and a useless affliction for the senseless. Yet “there is no power except from God; and whoever resists the power resists the ordinance of God; for rulers are a terror not to good work but to bad. Do you wish not to fear the power? Do good, and you will have praise from it.” For whether the power, favouring the truth, corrects someone, he who has been amended has praise from it; or whether, hostile to the truth, it rages against someone, he who has been crowned as victor has praise from it. But you are not doing good, so as to have no need to fear the power; unless perhaps it is good to sit and speak against, not a brother, but all the brothers established in all nations, to whom the prophets, Christ and the apostles bear witness when we read, “In your seed shall all nations be blessed”; when we read, “From the rising of the sun to its setting a pure sacrifice is offered to my name, for my name is glorified among the nations, says the Lord” (listen: “says the Lord”, not “says Donatus”, or Rogatus, or Vincentius, or Hilary, or Ambrose, or Augustine, but “says the Lord”); when we read, “And all the tribes of the earth shall be blessed in him; all nations shall magnify him. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, who alone does wonders, and blessed be the name of his glory for ever and for ages of ages; and the whole earth shall be filled with his glory. So be it, so be it.” And you sit at Cartenna and with the ten Rogatists who are left you say, “Let it not be, let it not be!”

### Scripture references

- Matt 3:7: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 13:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:3: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:20 (49:20 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:11: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:17 (71:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:18 (71:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:19 (71:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 13:1–3; Gen 22:18; Mal 1:11; Ps 72:17–19 (71:17–19 LXX). Sitting and slandering a brother: Ps 50:20 (49:20 LXX). Cartenna (Ténès, Algeria) was Vincentius's see.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.20 (CSEL 34.2:464–466; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-20).

## Letter 93.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:466–467
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Gospel and Acts foretell repentance preached to all nations; Vincentius would make forgiveness depend on finding him in Mauretania.

### Latin text

Audis loqui euangelium: Oportebat impleri omnia, quae scripta sunt in lege et prophetis et psalmis de me. tunc aperuit illis sensum, ut intellegerent scripturas, et dixit eis: Quoniam sic scriptum est et sic oportebat Christum pati et resurgere a mortuis tertia die et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipientibus ab Hierusalem). legis etiam actus apostolorum, quem ad modum hoc euangelium coeperit ab Hierusalem, ubi primo illos centum uiginti spiritus sanctus impleuit, atque inde in Iudaeam et Samariam et in omnes gentes exierit, sicut eis dixerat ascensurus in caelum: Eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in tota Iudaea et Samaria et usque in fines terrae, quia in omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum et in fines orbis terrae uerba eorum. et tu contradicis diuinis testimoniis tanta firmitate roboratis, tanta luce manifestis et ad istam proscriptionem Christi hereditatem perducere conaris, ut, cum in eius nomine, sicut dixit, praedicetur paenitentia in omnibus gentibus, quisquis hac fuerit praedicatione commotus, in qualibet parte orbis terrarum, nisi quaesierit et inuenerit latentem in Mauretania Caesariensi Cartennensem Vincentium aut aliquem ex eius nouem aut decem consortibus, dimitti ei peccata non possint. quid non audeat typhus morticinae pelliculae? quo non se praecipitet praesumptio carnis et sanguinis? hocine est bonum opus tuum, propter quod non timeas potestatem? tantum scandalum ponis aduersus filium matris tuae paruulum scilicet et infirmum, propter quem Christus mortuus est, nondum cibo paterno idoneum sed adhuc materno lacte nutriendum et Hilarii mihi libros opponis, uti neges ecclesiam crescentem in omnibus gentibus usque in finem saeculi, quam deus contra incredulitatem uestram cum iuratione promisit! et cum essetis infelicissimi, si tunc, quando promittebatur, resisteretis, nunc etiam, cum redditur, contradicitis.

### English translation (Claude)

You hear the Gospel speak: “All things had to be fulfilled that are written in the law and the prophets and the psalms concerning me. Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and said to them: Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day, and for repentance and forgiveness of sins to be preached in his name among all nations, beginning from Jerusalem.” You read also in the Acts of the Apostles how this Gospel began from Jerusalem, where the Holy Spirit first filled those hundred and twenty, and went out from there into Judea and Samaria and to all nations, as he had told them when about to ascend into heaven: “You shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria and to the ends of the earth”; for “their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.” And you contradict divine testimonies so firmly established and so clearly manifest, and try to bring Christ's inheritance to such a proscription that, though repentance is preached in his name among all nations, as he said, whoever is moved by this preaching, in whatever part of the world, cannot have his sins forgiven unless he seeks out and finds Vincentius of Cartenna, hidden away in Mauretania Caesariensis, or one of his nine or ten partners! What would the conceit of a scrap of dead skin not dare? Where would the presumption of flesh and blood not hurl itself? Is this your good work, on account of which you need not fear the power? You set so great a stumbling block against your mother's son, a little one, weak, for whom Christ died, not yet fit for his father's food but still to be fed on his mother's milk; and you set against me the books of Hilary, to deny the church growing in all nations to the end of the world, which God promised with an oath against your unbelief! And though you would have been most unhappy if you had resisted when it was promised, now you contradict it even when it is fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:44: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:45: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:46: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:47: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:4: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:4 (18:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:18: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 50:20 (49:20 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 14:15: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Luke 24:44–47; Acts 1:8; Ps 19:4 (18:5 LXX), cited in Rom 10:18. References: Acts 1:15; Acts 2:4; Ps 50:20; Rom 14:15; 1 Cor 8:11; 1 Cor 3:2. Hilary is presumably Hilary of Poitiers, whose works Vincentius had cited (the passage is not identified).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.21 (CSEL 34.2:466–467; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-21).

## Letter 93.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:467–468
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Vincentius argues that Christendom is small in the world; Augustine replies that the Gospel is spreading among barbarian nations as Christ foretold.

### Latin text

Sed historicus doctus magnum aliquid inuenisti, quod contra dei testimonia proferendum putares. dicis enim: Quantum ad totius mundi pertinet partes, modica pars est in compensatione totius mundi, in qua fides Christiana nominatur, nec uis adtendere aut te nosse dissimulas, in quam multas iam barbaras nationes tam paruo tempore uenerit euangelium, ut nec inimici Christi dubitare iam possint breui tempore futurum, quod discipulis respondit de saeculi fine quaerentibus: Et praedicabitur hoc euangelium in uniuerso orbe in testimonium omnibus gentibus et tunc ueniet finis. i nunc et clama et contende, quantum potes: etiam si apud Indos et Persas euangelium praedicetur, ubi quidem iam diu praedicatur, nisi, quisquis hoc audierit, Cartennas uenerit uel in uiciniam Cartennensium, mundari a delictis suis omnino non poterit. itane si carueris ista uoce, rideri te metuis et, cum ea non cares, flere te non uis?

### English translation (Claude)

But, as a learned historian, you have found something great that you thought could be brought against the testimonies of God. For you say: “As regards the parts of the whole world, the part in which the Christian faith is named is small compared with the whole world.” And you will not consider, or you pretend not to know, into how many barbarian nations the Gospel has already come in so short a time, so that not even the enemies of Christ can now doubt that what he answered the disciples when they asked about the end of the world will come to pass in a short time: “And this Gospel will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Go now, shout and argue as much as you can: even if the Gospel is preached among the Indians and Persians, where indeed it has long been preached, unless whoever hears it comes to Cartenna or the neighbourhood of Cartenna, he can by no means be cleansed from his sins! Is it, then, that if you refrained from saying this you fear you would be laughed at, and since you do not refrain, you do not want to be wept over?

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 24:14. The last sentence is compressed in the Latin; translated literally.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.22 (CSEL 34.2:467–468; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-22).

## Letter 93.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:468–469
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Vincentius explains “Catholic” as observance of all commandments; Augustine replies that the church is proven by Scripture's promise of all nations, not by the name.

### Latin text

Acutum autem aliquid uideris dicere, cum catholicae nomen non ex totius orbis communione interpretaris sed ex obseruatione praeceptorum omnium diuinorum atque omnium sacramentorum, quasi nos, etiam si forte hinc sit appellata catholica, quod totum ueraciter teneat, cuius ueritatis nonnullae particulae etiam in diuersis inueniuntur haeresibus. huius nominis testimonio nitimur ad demonstrandam ecclesiam in omnibus gentibus et non promissis dei et tam multis tamque manifestis oraculis ipsius ueritatis. sed nempe hoc est totum. quod nobis persuadere conaris, solos remansisse Rogatistas. qui catholici recte appellandi sint ex obseruatione praeceptorum omnium diuinorum atque omnium sacramentorum, et uos esse solos, in quibus inueniat fidem, cum uenerit filius hominis. da ueniam, non credimus. licet enim et hoc audeas forsitan dicere, ut in uobis possit inueniri fides, quam se in terra non inuenturum dominus dixit, non uos in terra sed in caelo esse deputandos, nos tamen apostolus ita cautos reddidit, ut etiam angelum de caelo nobis aliud euangelizantem, praeterquam quod accepimus, anathema esse debere praeceperit. quo modo autem fidimus ex diuinis litteris accepisse nos Christum manifestum, si non inde accepimus et ecclesiam manifestam? quaslibet quisque ansas et uncos aduersus simplicitatem ueritatis intexat, quaslibet nebulas callidae falsitatis offundat, sicut anathema erit, qui adnuntiauerit Christum neque passum esse neque tertio die resurrexisse, quoniam in ueritate euangelica accepimus: Oportebat Christum pati et resurgere a mortuis tertia die, sic erit anathema, quisquis adnuntiauerit ecclesiam praeter communionem omnium gentium, quia eadem ueritate consequenter accepimus: Et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipientibus ab Hierusalem et inconcusse tenere debemus: Quis quis uobis adnuntiauerit, praeterquam quod accepistis, anathema sit.

### English translation (Claude)

You seem to say something clever when you interpret the name “Catholic” not from the communion of the whole world but from the observance of all the divine commandments and all the sacraments; as if we, even if the church is perhaps called Catholic because it truly holds the whole (some small particles of which truth are found even in various heresies), relied on the testimony of this name to prove the church in all nations, and not on the promises of God and so many and such manifest oracles of the Truth himself. But this, of course, is the whole of what you try to persuade us: that the Rogatists alone are left, who are rightly to be called Catholics from the observance of all the divine commandments and all the sacraments, and that you are the only ones in whom the Son of Man will find faith when he comes. Pardon us, we do not believe it. For though you may perhaps dare to say even this, that you are to be reckoned not on earth but in heaven, so that in you may be found the faith that the Lord said he would not find on earth, yet the apostle has made us so wary that he commanded that even an angel from heaven preaching to us any other gospel than what we have received should be anathema. And how do we trust that we have received from the divine writings a manifest Christ, if we have not received from them a manifest church too? Whatever handles and hooks anyone may weave against the simplicity of truth, whatever fogs of cunning falsehood he may spread, just as anyone will be anathema who proclaims that Christ neither suffered nor rose on the third day, since we have received in the truth of the Gospel, “It was necessary for Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day”, so anyone will be anathema who proclaims a church apart from the communion of all nations, since we have received in the same truth, immediately after, “and for repentance and forgiveness of sins to be preached in his name among all nations, beginning from Jerusalem”; and we must hold unshaken: “Whoever proclaims to you anything other than what you have received, let him be anathema.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 18:8: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:9: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:46: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:47: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Luke 18:8; Gal 1:8–9; Luke 24:46–47. The Greek katholikos means “according to the whole”, which both explanations play on.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.23 (CSEL 34.2:468–469; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-23).

## Letter 93.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:469–470
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists read “Where do you lie down at noon?” as Africa; Augustine mocks the claim, which would favour the Maximianists, or the Arzuges, rather than the Rogatists of western Mauretania.

### Latin text

Si autem uniuersos Donatistas non audimus se pro ecclesia Christi opponentes, quia nullum pro se testimonium de diuinis libris proferunt, quo id doceant, quanto minus, rogo te, Rogatistas audire debemus, qui nec illud pro se interpretari conabuntur, quod scriptum est: Ubi pascis, ubi cubas in meridie? si enim hoc loco scripturarum meridies Africa intellegenda est in parte Donati, quod sub caeli feruentiore plaga est, omnes uos Maximianistae superabunt, quorum schisma in Byzantio et in Tripoli exarsit. sed confligant cum eis Arzuges et hoc magis ad se pertinere contendant. Mauretania tamen Caesariensis occidentali quam meridianae parti uicinior, quando nec Africam se uult dici, quo modo de meridie gloriabitur, non dico aduersus orbem terrarum sed aduersus ipsam partem Donati, unde pars Rogati breuissimum frustum de frusto maiore praecisum est? quis autem non inpudentissime nitatur aliquid in allegoria positum pro se interpretari, nisi habeat et manifesta testimonia, quorum lumine inlustrentur obscura?

### English translation (Claude)

If we do not listen to all the Donatists when they put themselves forward as the church of Christ, because they bring no testimony from the divine books to teach it, how much less, I ask you, ought we to listen to the Rogatists, who will not even try to interpret for themselves what is written: “Where do you feed, where do you lie down at noon?” For if in this passage of Scripture “noon” is to be understood as Africa, in the party of Donatus, because it lies under the hotter zone of the sky, the Maximianists will beat all of you, whose schism blazed up in Byzacena and Tripoli. But let the Arzuges fight it out with them and argue that this applies rather to themselves. Mauretania Caesariensis, however, being nearer the west than the south, since it does not even wish to be called Africa, how will it boast of the noon, I do not say against the whole world, but against the very party of Donatus, from which the party of Rogatus is a tiny scrap cut off from a bigger scrap? And who would not be most shameless to try to interpret something put in allegory in his own favour, unless he also has clear testimonies by whose light the obscure things may be illuminated?

### Scripture references

- Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX and Vulgate). The Arzuges were a people on the southern frontier of Tripolitania. The digital text reads “Byzantio”, evidently for Byzacena (the province); translated as Byzacena.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.24 (CSEL 34.2:469–470; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-6/#p-93-24).

## Letter 93.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:470–471
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If separation could be just, the Donatists cannot know whether some unknown group elsewhere separated justly before them; their claim rests only on their own testimony.

### Latin text

Quod autem omnibus Donatistis dicere solemus, quanto fortius uobis dicimus: si possunt, quod fieri non potest, aliqui habere causam iustam, qua communionem suam separent a communione orbis terrarum eamque appellent ecclesiam Christi, quod se iuste ab omnium gentium communione separauerint. unde scitis, in Christiana societate tam longe lateque diffusa ne forte, antequam uos separaretis, iam se aliqui iusta causa separauerant in longinquissimis terris, unde ad uos eorum iustitiae fama non potuerit peruenire? quo modo in uobis potest esse ecclesia potius quam in illis, qui se priores forte separauerunt? ita fit, ut, cum hoc nescitis, incerti uobismet ipsis sitis, quod necesse est contingat omnibus. qui pro sua societate utuntur testimonio non diuino sed suo. neque enim potestis dicere: si hoc contigisset, nos latere non posset, cum, in Africa ipsa quot iam partes factae sint ex parte Donati, si interrogemini, non dicatis, praesertim quia tanto sibi uidentur, qui hoc faciunt, iustiores, quanto fuerint pauciores, et utique tanto sunt latentiores. ac per hoc incerti estis, ne forte aliqui pauci iusti et ideo minime noti alicubi longe contra Africae meridiem, antequam pars Donati iustitiam suam a ceterorum hominum iniquitate secerneret, se primitus causa aequissima separauerint in latere aquilonis et ipsa sit potius ecclesia dei tamquam Sion spiritalis, quae uos omnes iusta separatione praeuenit, multoque praesumptius pro se interpretetur, quod scriptum est: Mons Sion, latera aquilonis, ciuitas regis magni, quam pro se interpretatur pars Donati: Ubi pascis, ubi cubas in meridie?

### English translation (Claude)

What we usually say to all the Donatists, we say all the more forcefully to you. Suppose that some could have (what is impossible) a just cause for separating their communion from the communion of the whole world and calling it the church of Christ, on the ground that they had justly separated themselves from the communion of all nations: how do you know whether, in a Christian society spread so far and wide, before you separated, some had not already separated with just cause in the most distant lands, from which the report of their righteousness could not reach you? How can the church be in you rather than in those who perhaps separated earlier? So it comes about that, since you do not know this, you are uncertain even to yourselves, which must happen to all who use for their society a testimony not divine but their own. For you cannot say, “If this had happened, it could not have escaped us”, since you could not say, if asked, how many factions have already arisen out of the party of Donatus in Africa itself; especially since those who do this think themselves the more righteous the fewer they are, and are certainly the more hidden. And so you are uncertain whether some few righteous people, and therefore hardly known, somewhere far off, opposite the south of Africa, before the party of Donatus set its righteousness apart from the iniquity of other men, did not first separate with most just cause on the side of the north, and whether that is not rather the church of God, as a spiritual Zion, which anticipated all of you by a just separation, and with much more presumption interprets in its favour what is written, “Mount Zion, the sides of the north, the city of the great king”, than the party of Donatus interprets in its favour, “Where do you feed, where do you lie down at noon?”

### Scripture references

- Ps 48:2 (47:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 48:2 (47:3 LXX); Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.25 (CSEL 34.2:470–471; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-25).

## Letter 93.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:471–472
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The fewness of the Rogatists would make Jews and pagans laugh, and contradicts Paul's use of Isaiah's “many are the children of the desolate”.

### Latin text

Et tamen uereris, ne, cum imperialibus legibus ad unitatem cogimini, nomen dei a Iudaeis et paganis diutius blasphemetur, quasi nesciant Iudaei, quem ad modum primus populus Israhel etiam bello delere uoluerit duas illas tribus et dimidiam, quae ultra Iordanen terras acceperant, quando eas putauerunt se ab unitate sui populi separasse. pagani uero magis nos blasphemare possunt de legibus, quas contra idolorum cultores Christiani imperatores tulerunt, et tamen ex eis multi correcti et ad deum uiuum uerumque conuersi sunt et cotidie conuertuntur. sed plane et Iudaei et pagani si tam paucos putarent esse Christianos, quam pauci uos estis, qui solos uos Christianos esse perhibetis, nec blasphemare nos dignarentur, sed numquam ridere cessarent. non timetis, ne uobis dicant Iudaei: Ubi est, quod Paulus uester ecclesiam uestram intellegit, ubi dictum est: Laetare sterilis, quae non paris, erumpe et clama, quae non parturis, quoniam multi filii desertae, magis quam eius, quae habet uirum, praeponens multitudinem Christianorum multitudini Iudaeorum, si Christi ecclesia est paucitas uestra? hocine illis dicturi estis: Ideo magis iusti sumus, quia pauci sumus, nec adtenditis eos responsuros: Quotlibet uos esse dicatis, non tamen estis illi, de quibus dictum est: Multi filii desertae. si tam exigui numero remansistis?

### English translation (Claude)

And yet you are afraid that, when you are compelled to unity by the imperial laws, the name of God will be blasphemed for longer by the Jews and pagans; as if the Jews did not know how the first people of Israel wished to destroy even by war those two and a half tribes that had received lands beyond the Jordan, when they thought these had separated from the unity of their people. As for the pagans, they can blaspheme us more over the laws that Christian emperors have passed against the worshippers of idols; and yet many of them have been corrected and converted to the living and true God, and are being converted daily. But clearly, if both Jews and pagans thought Christians were as few as you are, who claim that you alone are Christians, they would not even deign to blaspheme us; they would never stop laughing. Are you not afraid that the Jews will say to you: “Where is that passage which your Paul understands of your church, where it is said, ‘Rejoice, you barren one who does not bear; break forth and cry, you who are not in labour, for many are the children of the desolate, more than of her who has a husband’, so setting the multitude of Christians above the multitude of Jews, if your fewness is the church of Christ?” Will you say to them, “We are the more righteous because we are few”, and not notice that they will answer: “Say you are as many as you like, you are still not those of whom it was said, ‘Many are the children of the desolate’, if you are left so small in number”?

### Scripture references

- Josh 22:12: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 54:1: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:27: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Josh 22:10–12; Isa 54:1, quoted in Gal 4:27. The remarks on Jews and pagans are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.26 (CSEL 34.2:471–472; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-26).

## Letter 93.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:472
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If the Rogatists appeal to Noah's eight, they are not yet few enough, and cannot know whether others separated before them.

### Latin text

Hic tu oppositurus es exemplum iusti illius in, diluuio, qui cum domo sua solus liberari dignus inuentus est. uides ergo, adhuc quam longe sis a iustitia? prorsus donec ad septem remaneas, quibus tu sis octauus, iustum te esse non dicimus, si tamen non istam iustitiam, sicut dicebam, praeripuit aliquis ante partem Donati et cum suis septem iusta aliqua causa commotus se longe alibi separauit et a mundi huius diluuio liberauit. quod cum ignoretis an factum sit atque ita uobis inauditum, sicut multis populis Christianorum in longinquis terris constitutorum nomen Donati inauditum est. incerti estis, ubi sit ecclesia. ibi enim erit, ubi primum forsitan factum est, quod postea uos fecistis, si potuit esse ulla iusta causa, qua uos a communione omnium gentium separare possetis.

### English translation (Claude)

Here you will set against me the example of that righteous man in the flood, who alone with his household was found worthy to be saved. Do you see, then, how far you still are from righteousness? Until you are reduced to seven, with yourself as the eighth, we do not call you righteous; provided, however, that, as I was saying, no one before the party of Donatus forestalled this righteousness, and, moved by some just cause, separated himself with his seven far away somewhere else and saved himself from the flood of this world. Since you do not know whether this has happened, and it is as unheard of to you as the name of Donatus is unheard of to many peoples of Christians living in distant lands, you are uncertain where the church is. For it will be where what you did afterwards was perhaps first done, if there could be any just cause for which you could separate yourselves from the communion of all nations.

### Scripture references

- Gen 7:1: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:20: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Gen 7:1; 1 Pet 3:20 (eight saved).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.27 (CSEL 34.2:472; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-27).

## Letter 93.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:472–473
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The church is found in Scripture's promises, as the lily among thorns crying from the ends of the earth; heretics are “companions” who share the sacraments.

### Latin text

Nos autem ideo certi sumus neminem se a communione omnium gentium iuste separare potuisse, quia non quisque nostrum in sua iustitia sed in scripturis diuinis quaerit ecclesiam et, ut promissa est, reddi conspicit. ipsa est enim de qua dicitur: Sicut lilium in medio spinarum ita proxima mea in medio filiarum, quae nec spinae dici possent nisi malignitate morum nec filiae nisi communione sacramentorum. ipsa est, quae dicit: A finibus terrae ad te clamaui, cum anxiaretur cor meum, quae in alio psalmo dicit: Taedium detinuit me a peccatoribus relinquentibus legem tuam et: Vidi insensatos et tabescebam. ipsa est, quae dicit sponso suo: Ubi pascis, ubi cubas in meridie; ne forte fiam sicut operta super greges sodalium tuorum, id est, quod alibi dicitur: Dexteram tuam notam fac mihi et eruditos corde in sapientia, in quibus luce fulgentibus et caritate feruentibus quasi in meridie requiescis, ne forte uelut operta, id est occulta et ignorata inruam non in gregem tuum sed in greges sodalium tuorum, id est haereticorum, quos ita sodales dicit sicut spinas illas filias propter communionem sacramentorum, de quibus alibi dicitur: Tu uero unanimis meus, dux meus et notus meus, qui simul mecum dulces capiebas cibos; in domo domini ambulauimus cum consensu. ueniat mors super illos et descendant in infernum uiuentes sicut Dathan et Abiron, impiae separationis auctores.

### English translation (Claude)

We, however, are certain that no one could justly separate himself from the communion of all nations, because each of us seeks the church not in his own righteousness but in the divine Scriptures, and sees it fulfilled as it was promised. For she it is of whom it is said: “As a lily among thorns, so is my love among the daughters”; and these could not be called thorns except for the malice of their conduct, nor daughters except for the communion of the sacraments. She it is who says: “From the ends of the earth I have cried to you, when my heart was in anguish”; who says in another psalm, “Weariness has held me because of sinners who forsake your law”, and, “I saw the senseless and I pined away.” She it is who says to her bridegroom: “Where do you feed, where do you lie down at noon, lest I become as one veiled over the flocks of your companions?” That is what is said elsewhere: “Make your right hand known to me, and those instructed in heart in wisdom”, in whom, shining with light and glowing with love, you rest as at noon, lest perhaps, as one veiled, that is, hidden and unknown, I rush not into your flock but into the flocks of your companions, that is, of heretics. She calls them companions just as she called those thorns daughters, because of the communion of the sacraments; and of them it is said elsewhere: “But you, my equal, my guide and my familiar friend, who took sweet food together with me; we walked in the house of the Lord in harmony. Let death come upon them, and let them go down alive into hell”, like Dathan and Abiram, the authors of an ungodly separation.

### Scripture references

- Song 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 61:2 (60:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:53 (118:53 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:158 (118:158 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 90:12 (89:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:13 (54:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:14 (54:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:15 (54:16 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Num 16:31: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Song 2:2; Ps 61:2 (60:3 LXX); Ps 119:53 and 119:158 (118:53, 158 LXX); Song 1:7 (1:6 LXX); Ps 90:12 (89:12 LXX, in the Latin form); Ps 55:13–15 (54:14–16 LXX). Dathan and Abiram: Num 16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.28 (CSEL 34.2:472–473; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-28).

## Letter 93.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:473–475
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bridegroom's answer, “Unless you know yourself”, tells the church to know itself from Scripture's promises of a worldwide church; those who do not go out after divided flocks.

### Latin text

ipsa est, cui continuo respondetur: Nisi cognoueris temet ipsam, o pulchra inter mulieres, exi tu in uestigiis gregum et pasce haedos tuos in tabernaculis pastorum. o responsio dulcissimi sponsi! nisi cognoueris, inquit, temet ipsam. quia utique non potest ciuitas abscondi super montem constituta et ideo non es operta, ut incurras in greges sodalium meorum; ego enim sum mons paratus in cacumine montium, ad quem uenient uniuersae gentes. nisi ergo cognoueris temet ipsam non in uerbis calumniosorum sed in testimoniis librorum meorum. nisi cognoueris temet ipsam, quia de te dictum est: Porrige longius funiculos et palos ualidos confirma; etiam atque etiam in dextram atque sinistram extende. semen enim tuum hereditabit gentes et ciuitates, quae desertae erant, inhabitabis. non est, quod metuas, praeualebis enim, nec erubescas, quod detestabilis fueris. confusionem enim in perpetuum obliuisceris, ignominiae uiduitatis tuae non eris memor. ego enim sum dominus, qui facio te, dominus nomen ei et, qui eruit te, ipse deus Israhel uniuersae terrae uocabitur. nisi cognoueris temet ipsam, o pulchra inter mulieres, quia de te dictum est: Concupiuit rex speciem tuam, quia de te dictum est: Pro patribus tuis nati sunt tibi filii; constitues eos principes super omnem terram. nisi ergo cognoueris temet ipsam, exi tu; non ego te eicio, sed exi tu, ut dicatur de te: Ex nobis exierunt, sed non erant ex nobis. exi tu in uestigiis gregum, non in uestigiis meis sed in uestigiis gregum nec unius gregis sed gregum diuisorum et errantium. et pasce haedos tuos non sicut Petrus, cui dicitur: Pasce oues meas, sed pasce haedos tuos in tabernaculis pastorum, non in tabernaculo pastoris, ubi est unus grex et unus pastor. cognoscit enim semet ipsam, ne hoc ei contingat, quia hoc contigit eis, qui se in illa non cognouerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

She it is to whom the answer is given at once: “Unless you know yourself, O fairest among women, go out in the tracks of the flocks, and feed your kids in the tents of the shepherds.” O answer of the sweetest bridegroom! “Unless you know yourself,” he says; for surely a city set on a mountain cannot be hidden, and therefore you are not veiled, so as to run into the flocks of my companions; for I am the mountain prepared on the top of the mountains, to which all nations will come. Unless, then, you know yourself, not in the words of slanderers but in the testimonies of my books; unless you know yourself, for of you it is said: “Lengthen your cords and strengthen your stakes; spread out again and again to the right and to the left. For your seed shall inherit the nations, and you shall inhabit the cities that were desolate. There is nothing for you to fear, for you shall prevail; nor be ashamed that you were detestable. For you shall forget your shame for ever; you shall not remember the disgrace of your widowhood. For I am the Lord who makes you, the Lord is his name; and he who rescues you, the God of Israel himself, shall be called God of the whole earth.” Unless you know yourself, O fairest among women, for of you it is said, “The king has desired your beauty”; for of you it is said, “Instead of your fathers sons are born to you; you shall make them princes over all the earth.” Unless, then, you know yourself, go out. I do not cast you out, but go out, so that it may be said of you, “They went out from us, but they were not of us.” Go out in the tracks of the flocks: not in my tracks, but in the tracks of the flocks, and not of one flock but of flocks divided and wandering. And feed your kids, not as Peter, to whom it is said, “Feed my sheep”, but feed your kids in the tents of the shepherds, not in the tent of the shepherd, where there is one flock and one shepherd. For she knows herself, lest this befall her, because this befell those who did not know themselves in her.

### Scripture references

- Song 1:8 (1:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:14: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 54:2: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:3: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:4: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 45:11 (44:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 45:16 (44:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- John 21:17: quotation, high confidence
- John 10:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Song 1:8 (1:7 LXX); Isa 54:2–5; Ps 45:11, 16 (44:12, 17 LXX); 1 John 2:19; John 21:17; John 10:16. Allusions: Matt 5:14; Isa 2:2. Augustine reads Song 1:8 in its Old Latin form, with “unless you know yourself”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.29 (CSEL 34.2:473–475; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-29).

## Letter 93.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:475–476
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The church is both few compared with the wicked and many in itself, like Abraham's seed as stars (the strong) and sand (the weak).

### Latin text

ipsa est, de cuius paucitate dicitur in comparatione plurimorum malorum, quia angusta et arta uia est, quae ducit ad uitam, et pauci sunt, qui ambulant in ea. et rursus ipsa est, de cuius multitudine dicitur: Sic erit semen tuum sicut stellae caeli et sicut harena maris. idem quippe fideles sancti et boni et in comparatione plurium malorum pauci sunt et per se ipsi multi sunt, quia multi filii desertae, magis quam eius, quae habet uirum, et multi ab oriente et occidente uenient et recumbent cum Abraham et Isaac et Iacob in regno caelorum et quia exhibet sibi deus populum abundantem, aemulatorem bonorum operum, et multa milia, quae numerare nemo potest, uidentur in Apocalypsi ex omni tribu et lingua in stolis albis palmisque uictricibus. ipsa est, quae aliquando obscuratur et tamquam obnubilatur multitudine scandalorum, quando peccatores intendunt arcum, ut sagittent in obscura luna rectos corde; sed etiam tunc in suis firmissimis eminet. et si aliqua in his uerbis diuinis distributio facienda est, fortasse non frustra dictum sit de semine Abrahae: Sicut stellae caeli et sicut harena, quae est ad oram maris, ut in stellis caeli pauciores, firmiores clarioresque intellegantur, in harena autem maritimi litoris magna multitudo infirmorum atque carnalium, quae aliquando tranquillitate temporis quieta et libera apparet, aliquando autem tribulationum et temptationum fluctibus operitur atque turbatur.

### English translation (Claude)

She it is of whose fewness, compared with the very many wicked, it is said that “narrow and strait is the way that leads to life, and few are those who walk in it.” And again, she it is of whose multitude it is said: “So shall your seed be, as the stars of heaven and as the sand of the sea.” For the same faithful, holy and good people are both few in comparison with the more numerous wicked and many in themselves, because “many are the children of the desolate, more than of her who has a husband”, and “many will come from east and west and recline with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven”, and because God presents to himself an abundant people, zealous for good works, and many thousands whom no one can number are seen in the Apocalypse, from every tribe and tongue, in white robes and with victorious palms. She it is who is sometimes obscured and, as it were, clouded over by a multitude of scandals, when sinners bend the bow to shoot at the upright in heart in the dark of the moon; but even then she stands out in her firmest members. And if some distinction is to be drawn in these divine words, perhaps it was not said for nothing of the seed of Abraham, “as the stars of heaven and as the sand that is on the seashore”, so that by the stars of heaven may be understood the fewer, firmer and brighter, and by the sand of the seashore the great multitude of the weak and carnal, which sometimes appears quiet and free in a time of calm, but sometimes is covered and troubled by the waves of tribulations and temptations.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:14: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:17: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:27: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:11: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 7:9: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 11:2 (10:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and references: Matt 7:14; Gen 22:17; Gal 4:27 (Isa 54:1); Matt 8:11; Titus 2:14; Rev 7:9; Ps 11:2 (10:3 LXX, “in the dark of the moon” in the Latin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.30 (CSEL 34.2:475–476; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-30).

## Letter 93.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:476–477
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary's lament for a time of Arian confusion does not mean the church perished; the deceived were pardoned when corrected, and the church survived in its wheat.

### Latin text

Tale tunc erat tempus, de quo scripsit Hilarius, unde putasti insidiandum contra testimonia tot diuina, tamquam perierit ecclesia de orbe terrarum. potes hoc modo dicere nec tot ecclesias Galatiae tunc fuisse, quando dicebat apostolus: o stulti Galatae, quis uos fascinauit? et: Cum spiritu coeperitis, nunc carne consummamini? sic enim calumniaris docto uiro, qui tardicordes et timidos grauiter increpabat, quos iterum parturiebat, donec Christus formaretur in eis. quis enim nescit illo tempore obscuris uerbis multos parui sensus fuisse delusos, ut putarent hoc credi ab Arrianis, quod etiam ipsi credebant, alios autem timore cessisse et simulate consensisse non recte ingredientes ad ueritatem euangelii, quibus tu postea correctis sic, quem ad modum ignotum est, nolles ignosci? prorsus non nosti litteras dei. lege enim, quid de Petro scripserit Paulus et quid inde etiam senserit Cyprianus, et non tibi displiceat ecclesiae mansuetudo, quae membra Christi dispersa colligit, non collecta dispergit, quamquam et illi, qui tunc firmissimi fuerunt et uerba haereticorum insidiosa intellegere potuerunt, pauci quidem in comparatione ceterorum sed tamen etiam ipsi quidam pro fide fortiter exulabant, quidam toto orbe latitabant. ac sic ecclesia, quae per omnes gentes crescit, in frumentis dominicis conseruata est et usque in finem, donec omnino gentes omnes etiam barbaras teneat, conseruabitur. ipsa est enim ecclesia in bono semine, quod seminauit filius hominis et usque ad messem crescere inter zizania praenuntiauit. ager autem mundus est, messis finis saeculi.

### English translation (Claude)

Such was the time of which Hilary wrote, from which you thought you could lie in wait against so many divine testimonies, as though the church had perished from the world. In this way you might say that there were not so many churches of Galatia at the time when the apostle said, “O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you?” and, “Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?” For so you slander a learned man, who was sharply rebuking the slow of heart and the fearful, with whom he was again in labour until Christ was formed in them. For who does not know that at that time many of small understanding were deceived by obscure words, so that they thought the Arians believed what they themselves believed, and that others yielded through fear and consented in pretence, not walking straight toward the truth of the Gospel; and would you have refused them pardon when afterwards they were corrected, as they were pardoned? You plainly do not know the letters of God. Read what Paul wrote about Peter, and what Cyprian too thought of it, and let not the gentleness of the church displease you, which gathers the scattered members of Christ and does not scatter those gathered. And yet those who were then most steadfast and could understand the insidious words of the heretics, few indeed compared with the rest, but still, some of them went bravely into exile for the faith, and some lay hidden throughout the world. And thus the church, which grows through all nations, was preserved in the Lord's wheat, and will be preserved to the end, until it holds absolutely all nations, even the barbarian. For she is the church in the good seed which the Son of Man sowed and foretold would grow among the weeds until the harvest. “The field is the world; the harvest is the end of the age.”

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:19: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:39: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 71.3 (Letters): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Hilary of Poitiers wrote (De synodis) of the Eastern churches during the Arian controversy (ca. 359); the passage is not identified exactly. Quotations: Gal 3:1, 3; Gal 4:19; Matt 13:38–39. Peter rebuked by Paul: Gal 2:11–14; Cyprian discusses it in Ep. 71.3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.31 (CSEL 34.2:476–477; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-31).

## Letter 93.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:477–478
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Like Paul to the Corinthians, Hilary rebuked as if all were guilty while aiming at some; the world contains both weeds and wheat.

### Latin text

Hilarius ergo decem prouinciarum Asianarum aut zizania non triticum arguebat aut ipsum etiam triticum, quod defectu quodam periclitabatur, quanto uehementius tanto utilius arguendum putabat. habent enim etiam scripturae canonicae hunc arguendi morem, ut tamquam omnibus dicatur et ad quosdam uerbum perueniat. quod enim dicit apostolus ad Corinthios: Quo modo dicunt quidam in uobis, quia resurrectio mortuorum non est? manifestat utique non omnes esse tales, uerum tamen et tales non extra sed in eis fuisse testatur. a quibus ne illi seducerentur, qui non ita sentiebant, paulo post monuit dicens: Nolite seduci;. corrumpunt mores bonos conloquia mala. sobrii estote, iusti et nolite peccare; ignorantiam enim dei quidam habent; ad reuerentiam uobis loquor. quod autem dicit: Cum enim sint inter uos aemulatio et contentio, nonne carnales estis et secundum hominem ambulatis? tamquam omnibus dicit et uides, quam sit graue, quod dicit. proinde nisi in ipsa epistula legeremus: Gratias ago deo meo semper pro uobis in gratia dei, quae data est uobis in Christo Iesu, quia in omnibus ditati estis in illo, in omni uerbo et in omni scientia, sicut testimonium Christi confirmatum est in uobis, ita ut nihil uobis desit in ulla gratia, putaremus omnes Corinthios carnales et animales, non percipientes, quae sunt spiritus dei, contentiosos, aemulos, secundum hominem ambulantes. itaque et totus mundus in maligno positus est propter zizania, quae sunt per totum mundum, et Christus propitiator est peccatorum nostrorum, non tantum nostrorum sed et totius mundi propter triticum, quod est per totum mundum.

### English translation (Claude)

Hilary, then, was rebuking either the weeds, not the wheat, of the ten Asian provinces, or else the wheat itself, which was in danger through some failing, and he thought it should be rebuked the more usefully the more vehemently. For the canonical Scriptures too have this way of rebuking, so that something is said as if to all and the word reaches certain people. For when the apostle says to the Corinthians, “How do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?”, he clearly shows that not all were such, and yet he testifies that such people were not outside but among them. And so that those who did not think so should not be led astray by them, he warned a little later, saying: “Do not be led astray; bad company corrupts good morals. Be sober, righteous, and do not sin; for some have no knowledge of God; I speak to your shame.” But when he says, “For since there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not carnal and walking according to man?”, he speaks as if to all, and you see how grave is what he says. And so, if we did not read in the same letter, “I give thanks to my God always for you, for the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus, that in everything you were enriched in him, in all speech and in all knowledge, as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, so that you lack nothing in any grace”, we would think all the Corinthians carnal and natural, not perceiving the things of the Spirit of God, quarrelsome, jealous, walking according to man. So too “the whole world lies in the evil one” because of the weeds that are throughout the whole world, and Christ is “the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for those of the whole world” because of the wheat that is throughout the whole world.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:33: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:34: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 5:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 15:12; 15:33–34; 3:3; 1:4–7; 1 John 5:19; 1 John 2:2. Allusion: 1 Cor 2:14. “Bad company corrupts good morals” is also a line of Menander (Thais), quoted by Paul.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.32 (CSEL 34.2:477–478; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-32).

## Letter 93.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-33
- Source: CSEL 34.2:478–480
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scandals multiply as the wicked enter the church, but they cannot extinguish the elect, who grow with the weeds until the final winnowing.

### Latin text

Refrigescit autem caritas multorum propter scandalorum abundantiam, quanto magis magisque glorificato Christi nomine congregantur in communionem sacramentorum eius etiam maligni et perseueranter omnino peruersi sed tamen tamquam palea de area dominica non nisi ultima uentilatione separandi. non extingunt isti frumenta dominica in eorum quidem comparatione pauca sed multa per se ipsa; non extingunt electos dei congregandos in fine saeculi, sicut euangelium loquitur, a quattuor uentis, a summis caelorum usque ad terminos eorum. ipsorum enim uox est: Saluum me fac, domine, quoniam defecit sanctus, quoniam diminutae sunt ueritates a filiis hominum, de quibus et dominus dicit: inter abundantiam iniquitatis qui perseuerauerit usque in finem, hic saluus erit. denique non unum hominem sed plures in eodem psalmo loqui consequentia docent, ubi dicitur: Tu, domine, seruabis nos et custodies nos a generatione hac in aeternum. propter hanc enim abundantiam iniquitatis, quam dominus futuram esse praedixit, etiam illud positum est: Cum uenerit filius hominis, putas inueniet fidem in terra? dubitatio enim cuncta scientis nostram in illo dubitationem praefigurauit, quando ecclesia ex multis, de quibus multum sperauit, saepe decepta, quod aliter, quam credebantur, inuenti sunt, sic perturbatur in suis, ut de nullo facile boni aliquid uelit credere. ipsos tamen, quorum inuenturus est fidem in terra, per totum agrum cum zizaniis crescere dubitare fas non est.

### English translation (Claude)

But the love of many grows cold because of the abundance of scandals, the more and more, as the name of Christ is glorified, the wicked and the utterly and persistently perverse are also gathered into the communion of his sacraments; yet, like chaff, they are to be separated from the Lord's threshing floor only at the final winnowing. These do not extinguish the Lord's wheat, few indeed in comparison with them, but many in themselves; they do not extinguish God's elect, who are to be gathered at the end of the age, as the Gospel says, from the four winds, from the heights of the heavens to their ends. For theirs is the voice: “Save me, O Lord, for the holy man has failed, for truths are diminished among the sons of men”; and of them the Lord says that amid the abundance of iniquity, “he who perseveres to the end will be saved.” Finally, what follows teaches that not one man but many are speaking in the same psalm, where it is said: “You, O Lord, will preserve us and guard us from this generation for ever.” Because of this abundance of iniquity, which the Lord foretold would come, this too was said: “When the Son of Man comes, do you think he will find faith on earth?” For the doubt of him who knows all things prefigured our doubt in him, when the church, often deceived by many of whom she hoped much, because they were found other than they were believed to be, is so troubled about her own that she is unwilling to believe anything good easily of anyone. Yet it is not right to doubt that those whose faith he will find on earth are growing with the weeds throughout the whole field.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:31: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 12:1 (11:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 12:7 (11:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and references: Matt 24:12; Matt 3:12; Matt 24:31; Ps 12:1 and 12:7 (11:2, 8 LXX); Matt 24:13; Luke 18:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.33 (CSEL 34.2:478–480; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-33).

## Letter 93.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-34
- Source: CSEL 34.2:480
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The church swims in the Lord's net with bad fish, separate from them in heart, awaiting bodily separation at the end.

### Latin text

Ipsa est ergo ecclesia, quae intra sagenam dominicam cum malis piscibus natat, a quibus corde semper et moribus separatur atque discedit, ut exhibeatur uiro suo gloriosa non habens maculam neque rugam. corporalem autem separationem in litore maris, hoc est in fine saeculi expectat corrigens, quos potest, tolerans, quos corrigere non potest; non tamen propter eorum, quos non corrigit, iniquitatem ipsam bonorum deserit unitatem.

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, is the church that swims within the Lord's net with bad fish, from whom she is always separated in heart and conduct and withdraws, so that she may be presented to her husband glorious, without spot or wrinkle. But she awaits bodily separation on the seashore, that is, at the end of the age, correcting those she can, tolerating those she cannot correct; yet she does not desert the unity of the good because of the iniquity of those she does not correct.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:27: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Matt 13:47–48; Eph 5:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.34 (CSEL 34.2:480; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-34).

## Letter 93.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-35
- Source: CSEL 34.2:480–481
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The writings of bishops such as Hilary, Cyprian and Agrippinus do not have canonical authority and may be disagreed with.

### Latin text

Noli ergo, frater, contra diuina tam multa, tam clara, tam indubitata testimonia colligere uelle calumnias ex episcoporum scriptis siue nostrorum sicut Hilarii siue, antequam pars Donati separaretur, ipsius unitatis sicut Cypriani et Agrippini primo, quia hoc genus litterarum ab auctoritate canonis distinguendum est. non enim sic leguntur, tamquam ita ex eis testimonium proferatur, ut contra sentire non liceat, sicubi forte aliter sapuerunt, quam ueritas postulat. in eo quippe numero sumus, ut non dedignemur etiam nobis dictum ab apostolo accipere: Et si quid aliter sapitis, id quoque uobis deus reuelabit. uerum tamen in quod peruenimus, in eo ambulemus, in illa uia scilicet, quae est Christus, de qua uia psalmus ita loquitur: Deus misereatur nostri et benedicat nobis; inluminet uultum suum super nos, ut cognoscamus in terra uiam tuam, in omnibus gentibus salutare tuum.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not then, brother, against so many, so clear, so undoubted divine testimonies, try to collect slanders from the writings of bishops, whether of ours, like Hilary, or, before the party of Donatus separated, of the unity itself, like Cyprian and Agrippinus; first, because this kind of writing must be distinguished from the authority of the canon. For they are not read as if testimony were brought from them in such a way that it is not permitted to think otherwise, if perhaps at some point they thought otherwise than the truth demands. For we are among those who do not disdain to take as said to us too what the apostle said: “And if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you. Nevertheless, to what we have attained, let us walk in that”: in that way, that is, which is Christ, of which way the psalm speaks thus: “May God have mercy on us and bless us; may he make his face shine upon us, that we may know your way on earth, your salvation among all nations.”

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:6: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 67:1 (66:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 67:2 (66:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Agrippinus was bishop of Carthage before Cyprian (ca. 220), who first held a council on rebaptism. Quotations: Phil 3:15–16; Ps 67:1–2 (66:2–3 LXX). Allusion: John 14:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.35 (CSEL 34.2:480–481; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-35).

## Letter 93.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-36
- Source: CSEL 34.2:481
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If Vincentius values Cyprian, he should follow him in loving unity, refusing to separate the tares early, and not breaking communion over disagreement.

### Latin text

Deinde si Cypriani, sancti episcopi et gloriosi martyris, te delectat auctoritas, quam quidem, sicut dixi, a canonis auctoritate distinguimus, cur in eo te non delectat, quod unitatem orbis terrae atque omnium gentium et diligendo tenuit et disputando defendit, quod eos, qui se tamquam iustos ab ea separare uoluissent, adrogantissimos et superbissimos iudicauit inridens eos hoc sibi adsumere, quod nec apostolis concessit dominus, ut ante tempus zizania colligerent aut, tamquam ipsis paleam ferre et aream purgare concessum sit, paleas conarentur a tritico separare, quod unumquemque alienis peccatis maculari non posse monstrauit, quam sibi omnes impiae seditionis auctores solam causam separationis adsumunt, quod in eo ipso, in quo aliter sapuit, collegas diuersa sentientes nec iudicandos nec a iure communionis amouendos esse decreuit, quod in ea ipsa epistula ad Iubaianum, quae in concilio, cuius auctoritatem ad rebaptizandum sequi uos dicitis, primitus recitata est, cum fateatur in praeteritum sic esse admissos in ecclesiam, qui fuerant alibi baptizati, ut denuo non baptizarentur, unde illos sine baptismo fuisse arbitratur, tantum tamen ponit utilitatis et salubritatis in pace ecclesiae, ut propter illam non eos credat ab ecclesiae muneribus separari?

### English translation (Claude)

Next, if the authority of Cyprian, holy bishop and glorious martyr, pleases you (which, as I have said, we distinguish from the authority of the canon), why does it not please you in him that he both held by love and defended by argument the unity of the whole world and of all nations; that he judged those who wished to separate from it as righteous to be most arrogant and proud, mocking them for taking upon themselves what the Lord did not grant even to the apostles, to gather the weeds before the time, or trying to separate the chaff from the wheat as if it had been granted to them to carry the chaff and cleanse the threshing floor; that he showed that no one can be stained by other people's sins, which is the only cause of separation all the authors of ungodly sedition claim; that, in the very matter in which he thought otherwise, he decreed that colleagues who held different views were neither to be judged nor removed from the right of communion; that in the very letter to Jubaianus, which was read first in the council whose authority you say you follow in rebaptizing, though he admits that in the past those who had been baptized elsewhere were admitted into the church without being baptized again (and so he thinks they were without baptism), he nevertheless sets so much value and wholesomeness on the peace of the church that because of it he does not believe they were separated from the church's gifts (or offices)?

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Letters): allusion, high confidence
- Cyprian, Sent. 0 (The Opinions of the Eighty-Seven Bishops (Council of Carthage, 256)): allusion, medium confidence
- Cyprian, Ep. 73.23 (Letters): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Matt 13:29–30; Matt 3:12. Cyprian on the tares and chaff: Ep. 54.3; on colleagues who differ: Sententiae episcoporum (Council of Carthage, 256), preface; the letter to Jubaianus is Ep. 73 (73.23 on those admitted without rebaptism).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.36 (CSEL 34.2:481; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-36).

## Letter 93.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-37
- Source: CSEL 34.2:481–482
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If sharing sacraments with sinners destroyed the church, it perished before Cyprian and Donatus were born; so the Donatist separation has no excuse.

### Latin text

Qua in re, sicut ingenium tuum noui, facillime perspicis totam causam uestram penitus euersam et extinctam. si enim sacramenta cum peccatoribus communicando, sicut putatis, periit ecclesia, quae fuerat in orbe terrarum — nam uos ideo separastis —, iam prius tota perierat, cum, sicut dicit Cyprianus, in eam sine baptismo admittebantur, ac sic nec ipse Cyprianus habebat, in qua ecclesia nasceretur, quanto magis multo posterior uester auctor paterque Donatus! si autem illo tempore, cum in eam sine baptismo admittebantur. erat tamen ecclesia, quae pareret Cyprianum, pareret et Donatum, manifestum est non contaminari iustos peccatis alienis, quando cum eis sacramenta communicant. ac per hoc separationem, qua existis ab unitate, qua excusatione possitis abluere, non habetis impleturque in uobis sanctae scripturae illud oraculum: Filius malus ipse se iustum dicit. exitum autem suum non abluit.

### English translation (Claude)

In this matter, knowing your intelligence, you very easily see that your whole case is utterly overturned and extinguished. For if the church that had been throughout the world perished by sharing the sacraments with sinners, as you think (for that is why you separated), it had already perished entirely before, when, as Cyprian says, people were admitted into it without baptism; and so not even Cyprian himself had a church in which to be born, much less your much later founder and father Donatus! But if at that time, when people were admitted into it without baptism, there was nevertheless a church to give birth to Cyprian and to give birth to Donatus, it is clear that the righteous are not contaminated by other people's sins when they share the sacraments with them. And so you have no excuse with which to wash away the separation by which you went out from unity, and in you is fulfilled that oracle of holy Scripture: “A wicked son calls himself righteous, but does not wash away his going out.”

### Scripture references

- Prov 30:12: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Prov 30:12 in an Old Latin form (the Greek order of Proverbs differs here).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.37 (CSEL 34.2:481–482; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-37).

## Letter 93.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-38
- Source: CSEL 34.2:482–483
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Cyprian's view on rebaptism is found only in his own writings, not Scripture; he may have corrected it, and some even think it forged.

### Latin text

Meritis autem Cypriani sic non aequatur, qui propter paria sacramenta nec ipsos haereticos audet rebaptizare, sicut non aequatur meritis Petri, quisquis non cogit gentes iudaizare. sed illa Petri non tantum claudicatio uerum etiam correctio scripturis canonicis continetur; Cyprianus autem sensisse aliter de baptismo, quam forma et consuetudo habebat ecclesiae, non in canonicis sed in suis et in concilii litteris inuenitur. correxisse autem istam sententiam non inuenitur: non incongruenter tamen de tali uiro existimandum est, quod correxerit et fortasse suppressum sit ab eis, qui hoc errore nimium delectati sunt et tanto uelut patrocinio carere noluerunt. quamquam non desint, qui hoc Cyprianum prorsus non sensisse contendant, sed sub eius nomine a praesumptoribus atque mendacibus fuisse confictum. neque enim sic potuit integritas atque notitia litterarum unius quamlibet inlustris episcopi custodiri, quem ad modum scriptura canonica tot linguarum litteris et ordine ac successione celebrationis ecclesiasticae custoditur, contra quam tamen non defuerunt qui sub nominibus apostolorum multa confingerent frustra quidem, quia illa sic commendata, sic celebrata, sic nota est; uerum quid possit aduersus litteras non canonica auctoritate fundatas, etiam hinc demonstrauit impiae conatus audaciae, quod et aduersus eas, quae tanta notitiae mole firmatae sunt, sese erigere non praetermisit.

### English translation (Claude)

He who, because the sacraments are the same, does not dare to rebaptize even heretics is not thereby made equal to Cyprian in merit, just as whoever does not compel the Gentiles to Judaize is not made equal in merit to Peter. But Peter's limping, and also his correction, are contained in the canonical Scriptures; whereas that Cyprian thought differently about baptism from the form and custom of the church is found not in the canonical writings but in his own and in the council's. That he corrected this opinion is not found; yet it is not unfitting to think of such a man that he did correct it, and that perhaps this was suppressed by those who were too delighted with this error and did not wish to lose so great a patron. There are indeed some who contend that Cyprian did not hold this at all, but that it was forged under his name by presumptuous liars. For the integrity and knowledge of the writings of a single bishop, however illustrious, could not be guarded as the canonical Scripture is guarded by the writing of so many languages and by the order and succession of the church's celebration; and yet against it there were not lacking those who forged many things under the names of the apostles, in vain indeed, because it is so commended, so celebrated, so known; but what the effort of ungodly boldness can do against writings not founded on canonical authority it has shown from this very fact, that it did not hesitate to raise itself even against those that are confirmed by so great a weight of knowledge.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Peter compelling Gentiles to Judaize: Gal 2:11–14. Augustine's suggestions that Cyprian corrected his view, or that it was forged, are reported as he gives them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.38 (CSEL 34.2:482–483; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-38).

## Letter 93.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-39
- Source: CSEL 34.2:483
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts that Cyprian held rebaptism, since even so the church survived admitting the unbaptized, which refutes the Donatists.

### Latin text

Nos tamen duas ob res non negamus illud sensisse Cyprianum, quod et stilus eius habet quandam propriam faciem, qua possit agnosci, et quod ibi magis contra uos causa nostra demonstratur inuictior uestraeque separationis praesumptio, uidelicet ne macularemini peccatis alienis, tota facilitate subuertitur, cum apparet in litteris Cypriani communicata esse cum peccatoribus sacramenta, cum admissi sunt in ecclesiam, qui secundum uestram et, sicut uultis, illius sententiam baptismum non habebant, et tamen ecclesiam non perisse, sed in sui generis dignitate per totum orbem sparsa dominica frumenta mansisse. ac per hoc si perturbati tamquam ad aliquem portum sic ad auctoritatem Cypriani confugitis, uidetis, quem illic scopulum uester error offendat; si autem iam nec illuc confugere audetis, sine ullo luctamine naufragatis.

### English translation (Claude)

We, however, do not deny that Cyprian held that view, for two reasons: because his style has a certain face of its own by which it can be recognized, and because there our case is shown to be the more unconquerable against you, and the presumption of your separation, namely that you should not be stained by other people's sins, is overturned with complete ease; for it appears in Cyprian's writings that the sacraments were shared with sinners, when those were admitted into the church who, according to your opinion and, as you wish, his, did not have baptism, and yet the church did not perish, but the Lord's wheat remained, scattered throughout the world, in the dignity of its kind. And so, if in distress you flee to the authority of Cyprian as to a harbour, you see what rock your error strikes there; but if you no longer dare to flee even there, you are shipwrecked without any struggle.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.39 (CSEL 34.2:483; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-39).

## Letter 93.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-40
- Source: CSEL 34.2:483–484
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Cyprian either did not hold rebaptism, corrected it, or covered it by his love for unity, and his martyrdom pruned any fault.

### Latin text

Porro autem Cyprianus aut non sensit omnino, quod eum sensisse recitatis, aut hoc postea correxit in regula ueritatis aut hunc quasi naeuum sui candidissimi pectoris cooperuit ubere caritatis, dum unitatem ecclesiae toto orbe crescentis et copiosissime defendit et perseuerantissime tenuit uinculum pacis; scriptum est enim: Caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum. accessit huc etiam, quod tamquam sarmentum fructuosissimum, si quid in eo fuerat emendandum, purgauit pater falce passionis: Sarmentum enim, ait dominus, quod in me dat fructum, purgat illud pater meus, ut maiorem fructum adferat. unde, nisi quia haerens in diffusione uitis radicem non deseruit unitatis? nam etsi traderet corpus suum, ut arderet, caritatem autem non haberet, nihil ei prodesset.

### English translation (Claude)

Furthermore, Cyprian either did not hold at all what you cite him as holding, or he afterwards corrected it by the rule of truth, or he covered this, as a mole on his most radiant breast, with the abundance of love, since he both defended most copiously the unity of the church growing throughout the whole world and held most perseveringly the bond of peace; for it is written: “Love covers a multitude of sins.” To this is added that, if there was anything in him to be amended, the Father pruned him, as a most fruitful branch, with the knife of martyrdom: “For every branch in me that bears fruit,” says the Lord, “my Father prunes, that it may bear more fruit.” And why, if not because, clinging to the spreading vine, he did not forsake the root of unity? For even if he gave his body to be burned, but did not have love, it would profit him nothing.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Pet 4:8; John 15:2; 1 Cor 13:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.40 (CSEL 34.2:483–484; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-40).

## Letter 93.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-41
- Source: CSEL 34.2:484–485
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Cyprian records that earlier African bishops who refused reconciliation to adulterers still did not break communion with those who granted it.

### Latin text

Adtende adhuc paululum in litteras Cypriani, ut aduertas, quam inexcusabilem ostenderit, qui se uoluerit ab unitate ecclesiae, quam deus in omnibus gentibus promisit et reddidit, quasi iustitiae suae causa separare, magisque intellegas, quam sit uera sententia paulo ante a me commemorata: Filius malus ipse se iustum dicit, exitum autem suum non abluit. ponit in quadam epistula sua, quam scribit ad Antonianum, rem quandam satis rei, de qua nunc agimus, necessariam; sed melius uerba eius inserimus. antecessores, inquit, nostri quidam episcopi istic in prouincia nostra dandam pacem moechis non putauerunt, in totum paenitentiae locum contra adulteria clauserunt, non tamen a coepiscoporum suorum collegio recesserunt aut catholicae ecclesiae unitatem uel duritie uel censurae suae obstinatione ruperunt, ut, quia apud alios adulteris pax daretur, qui non dabat, de ecclesia separaretur. manente concordiae uinculo et perseuerante ecclesiae catholicae indiuiduo sacramento actum suum disponit et dirigit unusquisque episcopus rationem propositi sui domino redditurus. quid ad haec dicis, frater Vincenti? nempe intueris hunc tantum uirum, pacificum episcopum et fortissimum martyrem nihil uehementius sategisse quam ne unitatis uinculum rumperetur. uides eum parturientem, non solum ut paruuli in Christo concepti nascantur, uerum etiam ne iam nati de sinu matris excussi moriantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Look a little further into the writings of Cyprian, so that you may notice how inexcusable he showed anyone to be who wished to separate himself, as if on account of his own righteousness, from the unity of the church which God promised and has fulfilled in all nations, and may understand better how true is the saying I mentioned a little earlier: “A wicked son calls himself righteous, but does not wash away his going out.” In a letter he writes to Antonianus he sets out a matter quite relevant to the one we are now dealing with; but it is better to insert his words. “Some of our predecessors,” he says, “bishops here in our province, did not think peace should be given to adulterers, and wholly closed the place of repentance to adultery; yet they did not withdraw from the college of their fellow bishops, nor break the unity of the Catholic Church by the hardness or obstinacy of their censure, so that he who did not give peace should be separated from the church because peace was given to adulterers by others. While the bond of concord remains and the indivisible sacrament of the Catholic Church endures, each bishop disposes and directs his own conduct, and will give account of his decision to the Lord.” What do you say to this, brother Vincentius? Surely you see that this great man, a peaceable bishop and most valiant martyr, strove for nothing more earnestly than that the bond of unity should not be broken. You see him in labour, not only that little ones conceived in Christ may be born, but also that those already born may not be shaken out of their mother's bosom and die.

### Scripture references

- Prov 30:12: quotation, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 55.21 (Letters): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Cyprian, Ep. 55.21 (to Antonianus). “Peace” means reconciliation to communion after public penance; the passage concerns penance for adultery and is translated as written. Prov 30:12 (Old Latin) is quoted again.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.41 (CSEL 34.2:484–485; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-41).

## Letter 93.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-42
- Source: CSEL 34.2:485–486
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whichever side was right about reconciling adulterers, neither defiled the other by communion; so no one is stained by others' sins in the unity of Christ.

### Latin text

Porro autem ipsam rem, quam contra impios separatores commemorauit, adtende. si adulteris communicabant, qui paenitentibus adulteris pacem dabant, numquid illi, qui hoc non faciebant, collegio maculabantur istorum? si autem, quod ueritas habet et quod ecclesia merito tenet, recte paenitentibus adulteris pax dabatur, illi, qui in totum locum paenitentiae contra adulteros claudebant, impie utique agebant, qui membris Christi sanitatem negabant et claues ecclesiae pulsantibus subtrahebant et misericordissimae patientiae dei, quae illos propterea sinebat uiuere, ut paenitendo sanarentur sacrificio contriti spiritus et contribulati cordis oblato, dura crudelitate contra dicebant. nec tamen istos misericordes et pacificos cum eis Christiana sacramenta communicantes et eos intra unitatis retia tolerantes, donec ad litus perducti separarentur, tam immanis eorum error et impietas inquinabat aut, si inquinabat, iam tunc ecclesia malorum communione deleta est nec erat, quae pareret ipsum Cyprianum. si autem, quod certum est, permansit ecclesia, certum est etiam peccatis alienis in unitate Christi neminem posse maculari non malorum factis consentientem, ne ipsis peccatis communicando polluatur, sed propter societatem bonorum malos tamquam paleam usque ad ultimam uentilationem in area dominica tolerantem. quae cum ita sint, ubi est praesumptio separationis uestrae? nonne filii mali estis? ipsi uos iustos dicitis, exitum autem uestrum non abluitis.

### English translation (Claude)

Now consider the very matter he mentioned against the ungodly separatists. If those who gave peace to penitent adulterers were communicating with adulterers, were those who did not do so stained by the fellowship of the others? But if, as the truth holds and the church rightly maintains, peace was rightly given to penitent adulterers, those who wholly closed the place of repentance to adulterers were certainly acting ungodly: they denied healing to members of Christ, withdrew the keys of the church from those who knocked, and with hard cruelty contradicted the most merciful patience of God, who let them live precisely so that by repenting they might be healed through offering the sacrifice of a contrite spirit and a broken heart. Yet their error and ungodliness, monstrous as it was, did not defile those merciful and peaceable men who shared the Christian sacraments with them and tolerated them within the nets of unity until, brought to the shore, they should be separated; or, if it did defile them, then the church was already destroyed by communion with the wicked, and there was none to give birth to Cyprian himself. But if, as is certain, the church remained, it is certain too that in the unity of Christ no one can be stained by other people's sins, provided he does not consent to the deeds of the wicked, so as to be polluted by sharing in the sins themselves, but tolerates the wicked like chaff on the Lord's threshing floor until the final winnowing, for the sake of fellowship with the good. This being so, where is the presumption of your separation? Are you not wicked sons? You call yourselves righteous, but you do not wash away your going out.

### Scripture references

- Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 16:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Prov 30:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX); Matt 16:19 (keys); Matt 13:47–48; Matt 3:12; Prov 30:12. Augustine's statement that the church rightly reconciles penitent adulterers is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.42 (CSEL 34.2:485–486; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-42).

## Letter 93.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-43
- Source: CSEL 34.2:486–487
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatist Tyconius reports that a Donatist council of 270 bishops admitted traditors without rebaptism, and Donatus communicated with such bishops for forty years.

### Latin text

Iam si uelim et illa commemorare, quae Tychonius, homo communionis uestrae, scriptis suis inserit, qui magis contra uos pro ecclesia catholica scripsit frustra se ab Afrorum quasi traditorum communione secernens, quo uno eum Parmenianus suffocat, quid respondere poteritis, nisi quod de uobis idem Tychonius dixit et ego paulo ante recolui: Quod uolumus, sanctum est? scribit enim ille Tychonius, homo. ut dixi, uestrae communionis, a ducentis et septuaginta episcopis uestris concilium Carthagini celebratum, in quo concilio per septuaginta et quinque dies postpositis omnibus praeteritis limatam esse sententiam atque decretam, ut traditoribus immensi criminis reis, si baptizari nollent, pro integris communicaretur. Deuterium etiam Macrianensem episcopum communionis uestrae dicit traditorum plebem congregatam ecclesiae miscuisse et secundum statuta illius concilii a ducentis et septuaginta uestris episcopis facti fecisse cum traditoribus unitatem eique Deuterio post hoc factum iugiter communicasse Donatum nec solum huic Deuterio sed etiam uniuersis Maurorum episcopis per quadraginta annos, quos dicit usque ad persecutionem per Macarium factam traditoribus sine baptismo communicasse.

### English translation (Claude)

Now if I wished to mention also what Tyconius, a man of your communion, put in his writings (he wrote rather against you for the Catholic Church, while vainly separating himself from the communion of the Africans as traditors, for which one thing Parmenian strangles him), what could you answer except what that same Tyconius said of you and I recalled a little earlier: “What we want is holy”? For this Tyconius, a man, as I said, of your communion, writes that a council of two hundred and seventy of your bishops was held at Carthage, in which, after seventy-five days, setting aside all past matters, a sentence was polished and decreed that traditors, guilty of an immense crime, should be received into communion as if blameless if they were unwilling to be baptized. He says too that Deuterius, bishop of Macriana, of your communion, mixed a congregation of traditors with his church, and, according to the statutes of that council of two hundred and seventy of your bishops, made unity with traditors; and that Donatus communicated with this Deuterius continually after this deed, and not only with this Deuterius but with all the bishops of the Moors, who, he says, communicated with traditors without baptism for forty years, until the persecution carried out by Macarius.

### Translation notes

- Tyconius was a Donatist lay theologian (late 4th century), opposed by the Donatist bishop Parmenian of Carthage; his work cited here is lost. Macarius was the imperial commissioner of 347–348. Tyconius's writings are not in the site's extrabiblical list.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.43 (CSEL 34.2:486–487; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-43).

## Letter 93.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-44
- Source: CSEL 34.2:487
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Parmenian answered Tyconius but did not deny his facts, which living witnesses could confirm.

### Latin text

Sed dicis: Quis mihi est iste Tychonius? ille est Tychonius, quem Parmenianus rescribendo compescit et eum deterret, ne talia scribat; non tamen refellit ea ipsa, quae scribit; uno, sicut supra dixi, eum premit, quod, cum talia diceret de ecclesia toto orbe diffusa et quod neminem in eius unitate macularent aliena peccata, ab Afrorum se tamen quasi traditorum contagione remouebat et erat in parte Donati. posset autem dicere Parmenianus ista eum omnia esse mentitum; sed, sicut idem Tychonius commemorat, adhuc uiuebant multi, per quos haec certissima et apertissima esse ostenderentur.

### English translation (Claude)

But you say: “Who is this Tyconius to me?” He is the Tyconius whom Parmenian restrains by writing in reply and deters from writing such things; yet he does not refute the very things he writes. He presses him, as I said above, with one thing only: that though he said such things about the church spread throughout the world, and that other people's sins stained no one in its unity, he nevertheless removed himself from the contagion of the Africans as traditors and was in the party of Donatus. Parmenian could have said that he had lied about all this; but, as the same Tyconius mentions, many were still alive through whom these things could be shown to be most certain and most evident.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.44 (CSEL 34.2:487; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-44).

## Letter 93.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-45
- Source: CSEL 34.2:487–488
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even setting Tyconius aside, Cyprian's writings show that no one is stained by others' sins in the church's unity.

### Latin text

Sed de his taceo. contende Tychonium esse mentitum; ad Cyprianum te reuoco, cuius mentionem ipse fecisti. prorsus secundum scripta Cypriani, si peccatis alienis in unitate quisque maculatur, iam ante Cyprianum periit ecclesia nec erat unde existeret ipse Cyprianus. si autem hoc sentire sacrilegum est et certum est ecclesiam permanere, nemo alienis peccatis in eius unitate maculatur, frustra filii mali iustos uos dicitis, exitum uestrum non abluitis, non purgatis.

### English translation (Claude)

But I say nothing of these. Contend that Tyconius lied; I call you back to Cyprian, whom you yourself mentioned. Plainly, according to the writings of Cyprian, if anyone in unity is stained by other people's sins, the church perished before Cyprian, and there was nothing from which Cyprian himself could come into being. But if it is sacrilege to think this, and it is certain that the church remains, no one is stained in its unity by other people's sins; in vain, wicked sons, you call yourselves righteous; you do not wash away, you do not cleanse, your going out.

### Scripture references

- Prov 30:12: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 30:12 (Old Latin) is echoed again.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.45 (CSEL 34.2:487–488; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-45).

## Letter 93.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-46
- Source: CSEL 34.2:488–489
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Catholics do not rebaptize Donatists because baptism is Christ's; converts keep their sacraments, which begin to profit them only within the unity of the church.

### Latin text

Cur ergo, inquis, nos quaeritis? cur sic suscipitis, quos haereticos dicitis? uide, quam facile breuiterque respondeam. quaerimus uos, quia peristis, ut de inuentis gaudeamus, de quibus perditis dolebamus; haereticos autem uos dicimus, sed antequam ad pacem catholicam conuertamini, antequam errore, quo inretiti estis, exuamini; cum autem transitis ad nos, prius utique relinquitis, quod eratis, ne ad nos haeretici transeatis. baptiza ergo me, inquis. facerem, si baptizatus non esses aut si Donati uel Rogati, non Christi baptismo baptizatus esses. non sacramenta Christiana te faciunt haereticum sed praua dissensio. non propter malum. quod processit ex te, negandum est bonum, quod remansit in te, quod malo tuo habes, si non ibi habes, unde est bonum, quod habes. ex catholica enim ecclesia sunt omnia dominica sacramenta. quae sic habetis et datis, quem ad modum habebantur et dabantur etiam prius, quam inde exiretis. non tamen ideo non habetis, quia ibi non estis, unde sunt, quae habetis. non in uobis mutamus. in quibus nobiscum estis; in multis enim estis nobiscum; nam et de talibus dictum est: Quoniam in multis erant mecum; sed ea corrigimus. in quibus nobiscum non estis, et ea uos hic accipere uolumus. quae non habetis illic, ubi estis. nobiscum autem estis in baptismo, in symbolo, in ceteris dominicis sacramentis. in spiritu autem unitatis et uinculo pacis, in ipsa denique catholica ecclesia nobiscum non estis. haec si accipiatis, non tunc aderunt, sed tunc proderunt, quae habetis. non ergo, sicut putatis, suscipimus uestros, sed suscipiendo efficimus nostros, qui recedunt a uobis, ut suscipiantur a nobis, et, ut incipiant esse nostri, prius esse desinunt uestri. nec nobis coniungi compellimus operarios erroris, quem detestamur, sed ideo nobis illos homines coniungi uolumus, ne hoc sint, quod detestamur.

### English translation (Claude)

“Why then,” you say, “do you seek us? Why do you receive in this way those you call heretics?” See how easily and briefly I answer. We seek you because you were lost, so that we may rejoice over you found, as we grieved over you lost. We call you heretics, but before you are converted to Catholic peace, before you are stripped of the error in which you are entangled; when you pass over to us, you certainly first leave what you were, so that you do not pass over to us as heretics. “Then baptize me,” you say. I would, if you were not baptized, or if you had been baptized with the baptism of Donatus or Rogatus and not of Christ. It is not the Christian sacraments that make you a heretic, but wicked dissent. The good that remained in you is not to be denied because of the evil that came from you; and you have that good to your harm if you do not have it where the good you have comes from. For all the Lord's sacraments are from the Catholic Church; you have and give them just as they were had and given even before you went out from it. Yet you do not fail to have them because you are not there, where the things you have come from. We do not change in you the things in which you are with us, for in many things you are with us (of such it is said, “for in many things they were with me”); but we correct the things in which you are not with us, and we want you to receive here what you do not have there where you are. You are with us in baptism, in the creed, in the other sacraments of the Lord; but in the spirit of unity and the bond of peace, in short in the Catholic Church itself, you are not with us. If you receive these, the things you have will not then begin to be present, but will then begin to profit you. So we do not, as you think, receive your people; by receiving them we make ours those who leave you to be received by us, and in order to begin to be ours, they first cease to be yours. Nor do we compel workers of the error we detest to be joined to us; we want those men joined to us precisely so that they may not be what we detest.

### Scripture references

- Luke 15:24: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 55:18 (54:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 55:18 (54:19 LXX, in the Latin form “for in many things they were with me”). Allusions: Luke 15:24, 32; Eph 4:3. Augustine's doctrine that the sacraments of schismatics are valid but unprofitable outside unity is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.46 (CSEL 34.2:488–489; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-25/#p-93-46).

## Letter 93.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-47
- Source: CSEL 34.2:489–490
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul rebaptized John's disciples because John's baptism was not Christ's; Christ's baptism is equally valid whoever administers it.

### Latin text

Sed baptizauit, inquis, post Iohannem Paulus apostolus. numquid post haereticum? aut si forte audes illum amicum sponsi haereticum dicere et in unitate ecclesiae non fuisse, uolo et hoc scribas. si autem hoc dementissimum est uel sentire uel dicere, iam tuae prudentiae est considerare, quare post Iohannem Paulus apostolus baptizauerit. si enim post aequalem, omnes post uos baptizare debetis; si post maiorem, debes et tu post Rogatum; si post minorem, debuit post te Rogatus, cum presbyter baptizasses. si autem baptismus, qui nunc datur, ideo pariter ualet in eis, quibus datur, quamuis sint inparis meriti, per quos datur, quia Christi est, non eorum, a quibus ministratur, puto, quod iam intellegas ideo Paulum dedisse quibusdam baptismum Christi, quia Iohannis baptismo fuerant baptizati, non Christi; Iohannis quippe ille baptismus dictus est, sicut multis locis diuina scriptura testatur, quod et ipse dominus dicit: Baptismus Iohannis unde erat? de caelo an ex hominibus? baptismus autem, quem dedit Petrus, non erat Petri sed Christi et, quem dedit Paulus, non erat Pauli sed Christi et, quem dederunt, qui tempore apostolorum non caste sed per inuidiam Christum adnuntiabant, non erat eorum sed Christi et, quem dederunt, qui tempore Cypriani fundos insidiosis fraudibus rapiebant, usuris multiplicantibus faenus augebant, non erat eorum sed Christi. et quia Christi erat. ideo, quamuis non per aequales daretur eis, tamen, quibus dabatur, aequaliter proderat. nam si tanto melius quisque baptizatur, quanto a meliore fuerit baptizatus, non recte gratias agit apostolus, quod neminem Corinthiorum baptizauerit nisi Crispum et Gaium et Stephanae domum; tanto enim melius baptizarentur, quanto erat Paulus melior, si ab ipso baptizarentur. denique cum dicit: Ego plantaui, Apollo rigauit, uidetur significare se euangelizasse, illum baptizasse. numquid melior Apollo quam Iohannes? cur ergo post istum non baptizauit, qui post Iohannem baptizauerat, nisi quia iste baptismus per quemlibet datus Christi erat, ille autem per quemlibet datus, quamuis Christo uiam praepararet. tamen Iohannis erat?

### English translation (Claude)

“But the apostle Paul,” you say, “baptized after John.” Did he baptize after a heretic? Or if perhaps you dare to call that friend of the bridegroom a heretic and say that he was not in the unity of the church, I would like you to write this too. But if it is utter madness either to think or to say this, it is now for your prudence to consider why the apostle Paul baptized after John. For if he baptized after an equal, all of you ought to baptize after one another; if after a greater, you too ought to baptize after Rogatus; if after a lesser, Rogatus ought to have baptized after you, since you had baptized as a presbyter. But if the baptism now given is equally valid in those to whom it is given, though those through whom it is given are of unequal merit, because it is Christ's and not theirs by whom it is administered, I think you now understand that Paul gave the baptism of Christ to certain people because they had been baptized with the baptism of John, not of Christ. For that baptism was called John's, as the divine Scripture testifies in many places, as the Lord himself says: “The baptism of John, where was it from? From heaven or from men?” But the baptism that Peter gave was not Peter's but Christ's; and that which Paul gave was not Paul's but Christ's; and that which was given by those who in the time of the apostles proclaimed Christ not purely but from envy was not theirs but Christ's; and that which was given by those who in Cyprian's time seized estates by treacherous frauds and increased their gains by multiplying interest was not theirs but Christ's. And because it was Christ's, therefore, although it was not given by equals, it profited equally those to whom it was given. For if each is the better baptized the better the man by whom he was baptized, the apostle did not rightly give thanks that he baptized none of the Corinthians except Crispus and Gaius and the household of Stephanas; for they would have been the better baptized, the better Paul was, if they were baptized by him. Finally, when he says, “I planted, Apollos watered”, he seems to mean that he evangelized and Apollos baptized. Was Apollos better than John? Why then did he who had baptized after John not baptize after Apollos, unless because this baptism, by whomever given, was Christ's, while that one, by whomever given, though it prepared the way for Christ, was John's?

### Scripture references

- Acts 19:5: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 21:25: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:16: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:6: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 6 (On the Lapsed): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Acts 19:1–5; John 3:29; Matt 21:25; Phil 1:15–18; 1 Cor 1:14–16; 1 Cor 3:6. Cyprian's complaint about bishops seizing estates and lending at interest: On the Lapsed 6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.47 (CSEL 34.2:489–490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-47).

## Letter 93.48

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-48
- Source: CSEL 34.2:490–492
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If baptism by a drunkard is not repeated though John's was, neither is baptism by a heretic; Christ's baptism is the same whoever gives it.

### Latin text

Inuidiose dici uidetur: Post Iohannem baptizatum est et post haereticos non baptizatur; sed potest et hoc inuidiose dici: Post Iohannem baptizatum est et post ebriosos non baptizatur. melius enim hoc uitium commemoro, quod nec occultare possunt, in quibus regnat, et, quam multi ubique sint, quis uel caecus ignorat? et tamen inter opera carnis, quae qui agunt, regnum dei non possidebunt, etiam hoc ponit apostolus, ubi etiam haereses enumerat: Manifesta, inquit, sunt opera carnis, quae sunt fornicationes, inmunditiae, luxuria, idolorum seruitus, ueneficia, inimicitiae, contentiones, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, haereses, inuidiae, ebrietates, comissationes et his similia, quae praedico uobis, sicut praedixi, quoniam, qui talia agunt, regnum dei non possidebunt. hac ergo ratione, quamuis baptizatum sit post Iohannem, non baptizatur post haereticum, qua ratione, quamuis baptizatum sit post Iohannem, non baptizatur post ebriosum, quoniam et haereses et ebrietates in eis operibus sunt, quae opera qui agunt, regnum dei non possidebunt. nonne tibi uidetur quasi intolerabiliter indignum, ut, cum baptizatum fuerit post eum, qui non sobrie uinum bibens sed uinum omnino non bibens regno dei uiam parauit, non baptizetur post ebriosum, qui regnum dei non possidebit? quid hic respondetur, nisi quia ille baptismus erat Iohannis, post quem Christi baptismo baptizauit apostolus, iste autem baptismus Christi est, quo baptizauit ebriosus? inter Iohannem et ebriosum a contrario multum interest; inter baptismum Iohannis et baptismum Christi non a contrario sed tamen multum interest. inter apostolum et ebriosum multum interest; inter baptismum Christi, quem dedit apostolus, et baptismum Christi, quem dedit ebriosus, nihil interest. sic inter Iohannem et haereticum a contrario multum interest et inter baptismum Iohannis et baptismum Christi, quem dat haereticus, non a contrario sed multum interest; inter baptismum autem Christi, quem dedit apostolus, et baptismum Christi, quem dat haereticus, nihil interest. agnoscitur enim sacramentorum species aequalis, etiam cum magna differentia est in hominum meritis.

### English translation (Claude)

It seems invidious to say, “There was baptism after John, and there is no baptism after heretics.” But one could just as invidiously say, “There was baptism after John, and there is no baptism after drunkards.” I prefer to mention this vice because those in whom it reigns cannot hide it, and who, even if blind, does not know how many such there are everywhere? And yet among the works of the flesh, whose doers will not possess the kingdom of God, the apostle puts this too, in the place where he also lists heresies: “The works of the flesh are manifest,” he says, “which are sexual immoralities, impurities, licentiousness, idolatry, sorceries, enmities, strife, jealousies, animosities, dissensions, heresies, envyings, drunkenness, carousings and the like, of which I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God.” For the same reason, then, that there is no baptism after a heretic though there was baptism after John, there is no baptism after a drunkard though there was baptism after John: for both heresies and drunkenness are among the works whose doers will not possess the kingdom of God. Does it not seem to you intolerably unworthy that, when there was baptism after him who prepared the way for the kingdom of God not by drinking wine soberly but by drinking no wine at all, there should be no baptism after a drunkard, who will not possess the kingdom of God? What is the answer here, except that that baptism was John's, after which the apostle baptized with the baptism of Christ, while this baptism with which the drunkard baptized is Christ's? Between John and a drunkard there is a great difference, as of opposites; between the baptism of John and the baptism of Christ there is a great difference, not of opposites, but still great. Between the apostle and a drunkard there is a great difference; between the baptism of Christ given by the apostle and the baptism of Christ given by a drunkard there is no difference. So too between John and a heretic there is a great difference, as of opposites, and between the baptism of John and the baptism of Christ given by a heretic there is a great difference, though not of opposites; but between the baptism of Christ given by the apostle and the baptism of Christ given by a heretic there is no difference. For the form of the sacraments is recognized as equal even when there is a great difference in the merits of men.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:19: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:21: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Gal 5:19–21. John the Baptist drinking no wine: Luke 1:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.48 (CSEL 34.2:490–492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-48).

## Letter 93.49

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-49
- Source: CSEL 34.2:492–493
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine ironically supposes the Rogatists have no drunkards, mocking their claim to be the only faithful and recalling the Pharisee and the tax collector.

### Latin text

Sed da ueniam; erraui, quando te uolui de ebrioso baptizante conuincere; exciderat mihi cum Rogatista me habere rem, non cum qualicumque Donatista. potes enim tu in tam paucis collegis tuis et in omnibus clericis uestris nullum inuenire forsitan ebriosum. uos enim estis, qui non ex totius orbis communione sed ex obseruatione praeceptorum omnium diuinorum atque omnium sacramentorum tenetis catholicam fidem, in quibus eam solis inuenturus est, cum uenerit filius hominis, quando non inueniet fidem in terra, quia nec terra estis nec in terra, sed caelestes in caelo habitatis! nec adtenditis nec timetis, quia deus superbis resistit. humilibus autem dat gratiam? nec uos euangelii locus ipse compungit, ubi dominus ait: Cum uenerit filius hominis, putas inueniet fidem in terra? continuo quippe tamquam praesciens nonnullos sibi superbe adrogaturos hanc fidem dixit ad quosdam, qui sibi iusti uidebantur et spernebant ceteros, similitudinem hanc: Duo quidam ascenderunt in templum orare, unus Pharisaeus et alter publicanus et cetera. iam tibi, quae sequuntur, ipse responde. inspice tamen diligentius ipsos paucos uestros, utrum nullus illic baptizet ebriosus. tam enim late uastat animas haec pestilentia et tanta libertate dominatur, ut multum mirer, si non etiam uestrum gregiculum penetrauit, quamuis ante ipsum aduentum filii hominis, unius boni pastoris, iam uos oues ab haedis separasse iactetis.

### English translation (Claude)

But pardon me; I erred when I wished to convince you by the case of a drunkard baptizing. I had forgotten that I was dealing with a Rogatist, not with any ordinary Donatist. For among your few colleagues and all your clergy you can perhaps find no drunkard. For you are the ones who hold the Catholic faith not from the communion of the whole world but from the observance of all the divine commandments and all the sacraments; in you alone he will find it when the Son of Man comes, when he will not find faith on earth, because you are neither earth nor on earth, but dwell as heavenly beings in heaven! And you do not notice or fear that God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble? Nor does that very passage of the Gospel prick you, where the Lord says, “When the Son of Man comes, do you think he will find faith on earth?” For at once, as if foreseeing that some would proudly claim this faith for themselves, he told this parable to some who thought themselves righteous and despised others: “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector”, and so on. Answer yourself now what follows. Yet look more carefully at those few of yours, whether no drunkard baptizes among them. For this plague lays waste souls so widely and reigns with such freedom that I would be very surprised if it had not penetrated your little flock too, though you boast that you have already separated the sheep from the goats before the coming of the Son of Man, the one good shepherd.

### Scripture references

- Jas 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:8: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:9: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:32: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:11: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Jas 4:6 (1 Pet 5:5; Prov 3:34); Luke 18:8–10. Allusions: Matt 25:32; John 10:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.49 (CSEL 34.2:492–493; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-49).

## Letter 93.50

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-50
- Source: CSEL 34.2:493–494
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Catholics disapprove of those who use the laws out of hatred or greed to seize Donatist property or receive their excommunicates, but they tolerate such people within the church.

### Latin text

Audi sane per me uocem dominicorum frumentorum in area dominica usque ad ultimam uentilationem inter paleam laborantium per totum scilicet mundum, qua deus uocauit terram a solis ortu usque ad occasum, ubi etiam laudant pueri dominum: Quicumque uos ex occasione legis huius imperialis non dilectione corrigendi sed inimicandi odio persequitur, displicet nobis. et quamuis res quaeque terrena non recte a quoquam possideri possit nisi uel iure diuino, quo cuncta iustorum sunt, uel iure humano, quod in potestate est regum terrae, ideoque res uestras falso appelletis, quas nec iusti possidetis et secundum leges regum terrenorum amittere iussi estis, frustraque dicatis: Nos eis congregandis laborauimus, cum scriptum legatis: Labores impiorum iusti edent, sed tamen quisquis ex occasione legis huius, quam reges terrae Christo seruientes ad emendandam uestram impietatem promulgauerunt, res proprias uestras cupide appetit. displicet nobis. quisquis denique ipsas res pauperum uel basilicas congregationum, quas sub nomine ecclesiae tenebatis, quae omnino non debentur nisi ei ecclesiae, quae uera Christi ecclesia est, non per iustitiam sed per auaritiam tenet, displicet nobis. quisquis pro aliquo flagitio uel facinore proiectum a uobis ita suscipit, sicut suscipiuntur, qui excepto errore, quo a nobis separamini, sine crimine apud uos uixerunt, displicet nobis. sed nec facile ista monstratis et, si monstretis, nonnullos toleramus, quos corrigere uel punire non possumus; neque propter paleam relinquimus aream domini neque propter pisces malos rumpimus retia domini neque propter haedos in fine segregandos deserimus gregem domini neque propter uasa facta in contumeliam migramus de domo domini.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear, I pray, through me the voice of the Lord's wheat, labouring among the chaff on the Lord's threshing floor until the final winnowing, throughout the whole world, that is, in which God has called the earth from the rising of the sun to its setting, where even children praise the Lord: “Whoever, taking occasion from this imperial law, persecutes you not out of love that would correct but out of the hatred of enmity, displeases us. And although no earthly thing can rightly be possessed by anyone except either by divine right, by which all things belong to the righteous, or by human right, which is in the power of the kings of the earth, and therefore you falsely call yours the things you neither possess as righteous men and have been ordered to lose by the laws of earthly kings, and you say in vain, ‘We laboured to gather them’, when you read what is written, ‘The righteous will eat the labours of the ungodly’; nevertheless, whoever, taking occasion from this law, which the kings of the earth, serving Christ, have promulgated to amend your ungodliness, greedily seeks your private property, displeases us. Whoever, finally, holds the very property of the poor or the basilicas of the congregations, which you held under the name of the church and which are owed to no church but that which is the true church of Christ, not through justice but through avarice, displeases us. Whoever receives someone cast out by you for some disgrace or crime in the same way as those are received who, apart from the error by which you are separated from us, lived among you without crime, displeases us.” But you do not easily show these things, and if you show them, we tolerate some whom we cannot correct or punish; we do not leave the Lord's threshing floor because of the chaff, nor break the Lord's nets because of bad fish, nor desert the Lord's flock because of the goats to be separated at the end, nor move out of the Lord's house because of vessels made for dishonour.

### Scripture references

- Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 113:1 (112:1 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 113:3 (112:3 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Prov 13:22: quotation, low confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:32: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX); Ps 113:1, 3 (112:1, 3 LXX); Matt 3:12; Matt 13:47–48; Matt 25:32; 2 Tim 2:20. “The righteous will eat the labours of the ungodly” is an Old Latin form close to Prov 13:22 (identification uncertain). The property claims against the Donatists are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.50 (CSEL 34.2:493–494; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-50).

## Letter 93.51

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-51
- Source: CSEL 34.2:494–495
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Vincentius's own letter speaks of Augustine's conversion to the Christian faith, which was neither Donatist nor Rogatist; only shame keeps him from the true church.

### Latin text

Tu autem, frater, quantum mihi uidetur, si uanam gloriam hominum non adtendas et insensatorum contemnas opprobrium, qui dicturi sunt: Quare modo? sine dubio transies ad ecclesiam, quam ueram sentire te intellego. nec huius sententiae tuae testimonia longe peto. tu ipse in eiusdem epistulae tuae principio, cui nunc respondeo, haec uerba posuisti: Cum optime inquis, te nouerim longe adhuc a fide Christiana sepositum et studiis olim deditum litterarum quietis et honestatis fuisse cultorem cumque postea conuersus ad Christianam fidem, ut ex multorum relatione cognoui, disputationibus legalibus operam dares. certe si tu ad me illam epistulam misisti, haec uerba tua sunt. cum ergo fatearis me conuersum ad Christianam fidem, cum ego nec ad Donatistas nec ad Rogatistas conuersus sim, sine ulla dubitatione confirmas et praeter Rogatistas et praeter Donatistas esse Christianam fidem. haec ergo fides, sicut dicimus, in omnibus gentibus dilatatur, quae secundum dei testimonium in semine Abrahae benedicuntur. quid igitur adhuc dubitas tenere, quod sentis, nisi quia id, quod non sentis, uel aliquando sensisse uel aliud defendisse confunderis, et, dum erubescis corrigere errorem, non erubescis permanere in errore, quod utique potius erubescendum fuit?

### English translation (Claude)

But you, brother, as it seems to me, if you were not concerned with the vain glory of men and despised the reproach of the senseless, who will say, “Why now?”, would without doubt pass over to the church which I perceive you feel to be the true one. Nor do I look far for evidence of this opinion of yours. You yourself, at the beginning of that letter of yours to which I am now replying, put these words: “Since I knew you very well,” you say, “when you were still far removed from the Christian faith and once devoted to the study of literature, as a lover of quiet and honourable conduct; and since afterwards, converted to the Christian faith, as I learned from the report of many, you were giving yourself to disputations about the law …” Certainly, if you sent me that letter, these are your words. Since, then, you acknowledge that I was converted to the Christian faith, though I was converted neither to the Donatists nor to the Rogatists, you confirm without any doubt that the Christian faith exists apart from the Rogatists and apart from the Donatists. This faith, then, as we say, is spreading among all nations, which, according to God's testimony, are blessed in the seed of Abraham. Why then do you still hesitate to hold what you feel, except that you are ashamed either of having once felt what you do not feel, or of having defended something else; and while you blush to correct an error, you do not blush to remain in error, which certainly ought rather to have made you blush?

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Gen 22:18. Vincentius's sentence is quoted only in part, as in the letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.51 (CSEL 34.2:494–495; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-51).

## Letter 93.52

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-52
- Source: CSEL 34.2:495–496
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There is a shame that leads to sin and one that leads to grace; Vincentius should not fear the charge of inconsistency, from which Paul himself would not be free.

### Latin text

Hoc est illud, quod scriptura non tacuit: Est confusio adducens peccatum et est confusio adducens gratiam et gloriam. confusio adducit peccatum, cum erubescit quisque prauam mutare sententiam, ne aut inconstans putetur aut diu errasse se ipso indice teneatur; ita descendunt in infernum uiuentes, id est suam perditionem sentientes, quos Dathan et Abiron et Core hiatu terrae absumpti tanto ante futuros figurauerunt. confusio autem adducit gratiam et gloriam, cum erubescit quisque de propria iniquitate et paenitendo in melius commutatur, quod te facere piget illa perniciosa confusione superatum, ne tibi ab hominibus nescientibus, quid loquantur, obiciatur apostolica illa sententia: Si enim, quae destruxi, haec eadem iterum aedifico, praeuaricatorem me ipsum constituo. quae si dici posset etiam in eos, qui ueritatem correcti praedicant, quam peruersi oppugnabant, in ipsum Paulum primitus diceretur, in quo ecclesiae Christi magnificabant deum audientes, quod euangelizaret fidem, quam aliquando uastabat.

### English translation (Claude)

This is what Scripture did not keep silent: “There is a shame that brings sin, and there is a shame that brings grace and glory.” Shame brings sin when someone blushes to change a wrong opinion, lest he be thought inconstant or be held, on his own testimony, to have erred for a long time; so they go down alive into hell, that is, aware of their own ruin, whom Dathan, Abiram and Korah, swallowed by the opening of the earth, prefigured so long before. But shame brings grace and glory when someone blushes for his own iniquity and by repenting is changed for the better. You are reluctant to do this, overcome by that ruinous shame, lest men who do not know what they are saying should cast at you that saying of the apostle: “For if I build up again the very things I tore down, I make myself a transgressor.” If this could be said even against those who, once corrected, preach the truth that they attacked when perverse, it would be said first of all against Paul himself, in whom the churches of Christ glorified God when they heard that he was preaching the faith he once ravaged.

### Scripture references

- Num 16:32: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 55:15 (54:16 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:23: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:24: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 4:21 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Sir 4:21 (outside the 66 books). References: Num 16:31–33; Ps 55:15 (54:16 LXX); Gal 2:18; Gal 1:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.52 (CSEL 34.2:495–496; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-52).

## Letter 93.53

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-53
- Source: CSEL 34.2:496–497
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends the church's different treatment of returning deserters and first-time converts, and closes the long letter.

### Latin text

Nec quemquam putes ab errore ad ueritatem uel a quocumque seu magno seu paruo peccato ad correctionem sine paenitentia posse transire. sed nimis inpudens error est hic uelle calumniari ecclesiae, quam tot diuinis testimoniis esse constat ecclesiam Christi, quod aliter tractat illos, qui eam deserunt, si hoc ipsum paenitendo corrigant, aliter illos, qui in ea nondum fuerunt et tunc primum pacem eius accipiunt, illos amplius humiliando, istos lenius suscipiendo, utrosque diligendo, utrisque sanandis materna caritate seruiendo. habes epistulam prolixiorem fortasse, quam uelles. esset autem multo breuior, si te tantum in respondendo cogitarem; nunc uero. etiam si tibi nihil prosit, non puto nihil eis profuturam, qui eam legere cum dei timore et sine personarum acceptione curauerint. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

And do not think that anyone can pass from error to truth, or from any sin, great or small, to correction, without repentance. But it is a too shameless error to wish to slander the church, which so many divine testimonies show to be the church of Christ, because it treats differently those who desert it, if they correct this very thing by repentance, and those who were never yet in it and are then receiving its peace for the first time: humbling the former more, receiving the latter more gently, loving both, serving the healing of both with a mother's love. You have a letter longer perhaps than you would wish. It would be much shorter if I were thinking only of you in replying; but now, even if it profits you nothing, I do not think it will profit nothing those who take care to read it with the fear of God and without respect of persons. Amen.

### Translation notes

- The penitential treatment of those returning to the Catholic Church is translated as written; “repentance” here includes public penance.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 93.53 (CSEL 34.2:496–497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-93-53).

## Letter 94.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:497–498
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus of Nola, writing with Therasia to Augustine, describes receiving his letter in Rome through the deacon Quintus and reading it at leisure at Formiae.

### Latin text

Lucerna semper est pedibus meis uerbum tuum et lumen semitis meis. ita quotienscumque litteras beatissimae sanctitatis tuae accipio, tenebras insipientiae meae discuti sentio et quasi collyrio declarationis infuso oculis mentis meae purius uideo ignorantiae nocte depulsa et caligine dubitationis abstersa. quod cum saepe alias per munera epistularum tuarum mihi donatum senserim, tum praecipue isto recentium litterarum libello, cuius mihi tam gratus quam dignus portitor fuit uir benedictus domini frater noster Quintus diaconus, qui longo quidem, posteaquam ad urbem uenerat, interuallo, cum eo iuxta sollemnem meum morem post pascha domini pro apostolorum et martyrum ueneratione uenissem, benedictionem oris tui reddidit nobis. uerum tamen oblitterato, quod nesciente me Romae consumpserat, tempore recentissimus mihi uisus est a conspectu tuo, ita ut tunc statim eum a te mihi uenisse crederem, cum primum uidebam et cum mihi plenum odorem suauitatis tuae in eloquiis tuis caelestis unguenti castitate fragrantibus offerebat. fateor tamen uenerandae unanimitati tuae non potuisse me uolumen ipsum statim, ut acceperam, Romae legere; tantae enim illic turbae erant, ut non possem munus tuum diligenter inspicere et eo, ut cupiebam, perfrui, scilicet ut perlegerem iugiter, si legere coepissem. itaque, ut fieri solet, secura expectatione conuiuii praeparati auidae licet mentis esuriem refrenaui et spe certa capiendae saturitatis, cum in manu tenerem panes desiderii mei in uolumine deuorando, quod postea uoranti mihi et in ore et in uentre dulcissimum fuit, inhiantem in fauos litterarum tuarum gulam facile suspendi, donec urbe proficiscerer et interponendum ad itineris statiua diem, quem in oppido Formiano habuimus, totum huic operi manciparem, ut in deliciis epistulae tuae spiritalibus ab omni faece curarum et suffocatione turbarum liber epularer.

### English translation (Claude)

“Your word is always a lamp to my feet and a light to my paths.” So, whenever I receive a letter from your most blessed Holiness, I feel the darkness of my foolishness scattered, and, as if the eye-salve of explanation had been poured into the eyes of my mind, I see more clearly, the night of ignorance driven away and the mist of doubt wiped off. I have often felt this given to me at other times through the gift of your letters, but especially through this little book, your recent letter, whose bearer was as welcome to me as he was worthy, a man blessed of the Lord, our brother the deacon Quintus. A long while after he had come to the City, when I had come there according to my customary practice after the Lord's Pascha to venerate the apostles and martyrs, he delivered your blessing to us. Yet, the time he had spent in Rome without my knowledge being forgotten, he seemed to me to have come most recently from your presence, so that I believed he had come to me from you at that very moment, when I first saw him and when he offered me the full fragrance of your sweetness in your words, which breathe the chastity of a heavenly ointment. I confess, however, to your venerable Unanimity that I could not read the volume itself in Rome as soon as I had received it; for there were such crowds there that I could not examine your gift carefully and enjoy it as I wished, that is, read it straight through once I had begun to read. And so, as usually happens, in the secure expectation of a feast prepared, I restrained the hunger of my eager mind, and with sure hope of being filled, holding in my hand the loaves of my desire in a volume to be devoured (which afterwards, when I devoured it, was most sweet both in my mouth and in my stomach), I easily held back my appetite as it gaped at the honeycombs of your letters, until I set out from the City and could devote wholly to this work the day that had to be spent at a halt on the journey, which we had in the town of Formiae, so that, free from all the dregs of cares and the stifling of crowds, I might feast on the spiritual delights of your letter.

### Scripture references

- Ps 119:105 (118:105 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rev 3:18: allusion, low confidence
- Ezek 3:3: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Paulinus of Nola (and Therasia, according to the NPNF heading) to Augustine; it answers Augustine's Ep. 92 on the death of Melanius (Valerius Publicola), son of Melania the Elder. Quotation: Ps 119:105 (118:105 LXX). Allusions: Rev 3:18 (eye-salve); Ezek 3:3 and Rev 10:9–10 (sweet in the mouth).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.1 (CSEL 34.2:497–498; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-1).

## Letter 94.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:498–499
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus praises Augustine's understanding of Melania's restrained tears for her son, who died before giving up senatorial ambition for the monastic life.

### Latin text

Quid ergo humilis et terrenus respondeam ad hanc sapientiam, quae data est tibi desuper, quam mundus hic non capit et quam nemo sapit nisi sapientia dei sapiens et uerbo dei eloquens? itaque quia experimentum habeo Christi in te loquentis, in deo laudabo sermones tuos et non timebo a timore nocturno, quia docuisti me in spiritu ueritatis salubre moderandi in occiduis mortalibus animi temperamentum, quo et illam beatam matrem et auiam Melanium fleuisse carnalem obitum unici filii taciturno quidem luctu non tamen sicco a maternis lacrimis dolore uidisti. cuius quidem modestas et graues lacrimas sicut propior uel aequalior animae eius spiritus altius intellexisti et perfectae in Christo feminae salua uirilis animi fortitudine cor maternum de cordis tui similitudine melius ex aequo statu contemplatus es, ut eam primum pro naturali affectione permotam deinde causa potiore compunctam fleuisse perspiceres non tam illud humanum, quod unicum filium condicione mortali functum in praesenti saeculo amisisset, quam quod propemodum in saeculari uanitate praeuentum, quia necdum illum deseruerat senatoriae dignitatis ambitio, non iuxta sanctam uotorum suorum auaritiam cogitaret adsumptum, ut de conuersationis gloria transisset ad gloriam resurrectionis communem cum matre requiem coronamque capturus, si in huius saeculi uita matris exemplo saccum togae et monasterium senatui praetulisset.

### English translation (Claude)

What then can I, lowly and earthly, answer to this wisdom which is given you from above, which this world does not grasp and which no one understands except one who is wise with the wisdom of God and eloquent with the Word of God? And so, because I have proof of Christ speaking in you, in God I will praise your words and will not fear the terror of the night, since you have taught me in the spirit of truth the wholesome restraint of the soul to be kept regarding mortal things that pass away, by which you saw that blessed mother and grandmother Melanium wept for the bodily death of her only son, with a silent grief, yet not without a mother's tears in her sorrow. Her modest and grave tears you understood more deeply, as a spirit nearer or more equal to her soul; and, saving the manly fortitude of a woman perfect in Christ, you contemplated her mother's heart better, from an equal standing, by the likeness of your own heart, so that you perceived that she, first moved by natural affection and then pierced by a weightier cause, wept not so much for that human thing, that she had lost in this present world an only son who had paid the debt of mortality, as because she thought him taken away almost overtaken in worldly vanity, since the ambition of senatorial rank had not yet left him, and not according to the holy greed of her prayers, namely that he should have passed from the glory of the religious life to the glory of the resurrection, to take with his mother a common rest and crown, if in the life of this world he had, by his mother's example, preferred sackcloth to the toga and the monastery to the senate.

### Scripture references

- Jas 3:17: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 13:3: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 56:10 (55:11 LXX): quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 91:5 (90:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Melanium (Melania the Elder) and her son Valerius Publicola, a senator, who died ca. 406. References: Jas 3:17 (wisdom from above); 2 Cor 13:3; Ps 56:4, 10 (55:5, 11 LXX); Ps 91:5 (90:5 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.2 (CSEL 34.2:498–499; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-2).

## Letter 94.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:499–501
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus praises the humility and charity of Melania's son and defers to Augustine's praise of Melania.

### Latin text

Verum tamen idem uir, ut et antea rettulisse me puto sanctitati tuae, his operibus locupletatus abscessit, ut maternae humilitatis nobilitatem si ueste non gesserit, mente praetulerit. ita enim secundum uerbum domini mitis moribus fuit et humilis corde, ut non inmerito credatur introisse in requiem domini, quoniam sunt reliquiae homini pacifico et mansueti possidebunt terram placentes deo in regione uiuorum. nam certe et illud apostoli non solum tacito mitis affectu sed et conspicuis religiosus impleuit officiis, ut, cum esset altorum huius saeculi in ordine et honore collega, non tamen ut gloriosus terrae alta saperet, sed ut Christi perfectus imitator humilibus consentiret et tota etiam die misereri et commodare persisteret. unde et semen eius potens in terra factum est inter eos, qui dei fortes terrae nimium eleuati sunt, ut etiam de beatissima familiae ac domus eius uisitatione sanctum hominis meritum reueletur. generatio, inquit, rectorum benedicetur; gloria non caduca et diuitiae non labentes in domo eius, domo, quae aedificatur in caelis non labore manuum sed operum sanctitate. sed cesso plura de memoria tam dilecti mihi quam deuoti Christo hominis enarrare, cum et pristinis litteris non pauca super eo narrasse me repetam et nihil possim de beata huius filii matre et sanctorum pari radice ramorum Melanio melius aut sanctius praedicare, quam sanctitas tua in eam profari et disputare dignata est, ut, quia ego peccator inmunda labia habens nihil dignum loqui potueram ut longinquus a meritis fidei eius animaeque uirtutibus, tu ille uir Christi, doctor Israhel in ecclesia ueritatis, procurante in melius dei gratia parareris dignior tam uirilis in Christo animae praedicator, qui et mentem eius diuina uirtute firmatam, ut dixi, spiritu propiore conspiceres et mixtam cum uirtute pietatem eloquio digniore laudares.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet that same man, as I think I reported to your Holiness before, departed enriched with such works that, if he did not wear his mother's noble humility in his dress, he displayed it in his mind. For he was, according to the word of the Lord, so meek in conduct and humble in heart that it is not without reason believed that he has entered into the Lord's rest, since “there is a posterity for the peaceable man”, and “the meek shall possess the land”, pleasing God “in the land of the living.” For certainly he fulfilled that saying of the apostle too, not only with the silent disposition of a meek man but also with conspicuous religious service: though he was a colleague in the rank and honour of the high ones of this world, he did not, like one glorious on earth, mind high things, but, as a perfect imitator of Christ, agreed with the humble, and persisted all day long in showing mercy and lending. Hence his seed too has become mighty on earth among those who, as God's strong ones of the earth, are greatly exalted, so that the holy merit of the man is revealed even by the most blessed visitation of his family and household. “The generation of the upright,” it says, “will be blessed”; glory that does not fall and riches that do not slip away are in his house, a house built in the heavens not by the labour of hands but by holiness of works. But I cease telling more about the memory of a man as dear to me as he was devoted to Christ, since I recall that in earlier letters I told not a little about him, and since I can say nothing better or holier of this son's blessed mother Melanium, the root equal to her holy branches, than what your Holiness has deigned to say and discuss about her: so that, because I, a sinner with unclean lips, could say nothing worthy, being far from the merits of her faith and the virtues of her soul, you, that man of Christ, the teacher of Israel in the church of the truth, were provided by the grace of God, arranging things for the better, as a worthier herald of so manly a soul in Christ, who both saw her mind, strengthened by divine power, as I have said, with a nearer spirit, and praised her piety, mixed with virtue, with worthier eloquence.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:29: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 4:10: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 37:37 (36:37 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:9 (114:9 LXX): quotation, medium confidence
- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 37:26 (36:26 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 112:2 (111:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 112:3 (111:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 47:9 (46:10 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 5:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Isa 6:5: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:10: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Matt 11:29; Heb 4:10; Ps 37:37 and 37:11 (36:37, 11 LXX); Matt 5:5; Ps 116:9 (114:9 LXX); Rom 12:16; Ps 37:26 (36:26 LXX); Ps 112:2–3 (111:2–3 LXX); Ps 47:9 (46:10 LXX); 2 Cor 5:1; Isa 6:5; John 3:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.3 (CSEL 34.2:499–501; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-3).

## Letter 94.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:501
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine instead to teach him how to die to the world now, as Augustine has.

### Latin text

Quae uero post resurrectionem carnis in illo saeculo beatorum futura sit actio, tu me interrogare dignatus es. at te ego de praesenti uitae meae statu ut magistrum et medicum spiritalem consulo, ut doceas me facere uoluntates dei, tuis uestigiis ambulare post Christum et mortem istam euangelicam prius emori, qua carnalem resolutionem uoluntario praeuenimus excessu non obitu sed sententia recedentes ab huius saeculi uita, quae tota temptationum uel, ut tu aliquando ad me locutus es, tota temptatio est. utinam ergo sic dirigantur uiae meae post uestigia tua, ut exemplo tuo soluens calciamentum uetus de pedibus meis disrumpam uincula mea et liber exultem ad currendam uiam, quo possim adsequi mortem istam, qua tu mortuus es huic saeculo, ut uiuas deo Christo uiuente in te, cuius et mors et uita in corpore tuo et corde et ore cognoscitur, quia non sapit cor tuum terrena nec os tuum loquitur opera hominum, sed uerbum Christi abundat in pectore tuo et spiritus ueritatis effunditur in lingua tua superni fluminis impetu laetificans ciuitatem dei!

### English translation (Claude)

You have deigned to ask me what the activity of the blessed will be in that world after the resurrection of the flesh. But I consult you, as a teacher and spiritual physician, about the present state of my life: that you may teach me to do the will of God, to walk in your footsteps after Christ, and first to die that Gospel death by which we forestall our bodily dissolution by a voluntary departure, withdrawing from the life of this world not by dying but by resolve; for this life is wholly a life of temptations, or, as you once said to me, wholly temptation. Would, then, that my ways might be so directed after your footsteps that, by your example loosing the old shoe from my feet, I might break my bonds and exult in freedom to run the course, so that I may attain that death by which you have died to this world, that you may live to God with Christ living in you, whose death and life are recognized in your body and heart and mouth; for your heart does not savour earthly things, nor does your mouth speak of the works of men, but the word of Christ abounds in your breast and the spirit of truth is poured out on your tongue, gladdening the city of God with the rush of the heavenly river!

### Scripture references

- Ps 143:10 (142:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Job 7:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 3:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 116:16 (115:16 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 6:10: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:20: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 46:4 (45:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 143:10 (142:10 LXX); Job 7:1 (Latin “temptation”); Exod 3:5; Ps 116:16 (115:16 LXX); Ps 19:5 (18:6 LXX); Rom 6:10–11; Gal 2:20; Ps 17:4 (16:4 LXX); Col 3:16; Ps 46:4 (45:5 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.4 (CSEL 34.2:501; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-4).

## Letter 94.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:501–502
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love, strong as death, makes us die to the world in imitation of Christ, whose risen body is the pledge of our own glorification.

### Latin text

Quae autem uirtus hanc in nobis efficit mortem nisi caritas, quae fortis est ut mors? sic enim oblitterat nobis et perimit hoc saeculum, ut impleat mortis effectum per affectum Christi, in quem conuersi auertimur ab hoc mundo et cui uiuentes morimur ab elementis huius mundi nec tamquam uiuentes in eorum conspectu usuque decernimus, quia portio nostra mors Christi est, cuius a mortuis resurrectionem non adprehendimus in gloria, nisi mortem eius in cruce mortificatis membris et sensibus carnis imitemur, ut iam non nostra uoluntate uiuamus sed illius, cuius uoluntas sanctificatio nostra est et qui ideo pro nobis mortuus est et resurrexit, ut iam non nobis sed illi uiuamus, qui pro nobis mortuus est et resurrexit et dedit nobis pignus repromissionis suae spiritu suo, sicut pignus uitae nostrae posuit in caelis in corpore suo, quod est corporis nostri. unde nunc expectatio nostra dominus est et substantia, quae ab ipso facta est, apud ipsum et in ipso et per ipsum est, qui conformatus est corpori humilitatis nostrae, ut nos conformaret corpori gloriae suae et secum in caelestibus conlocaret. propterea et qui digni fuerint uita aeterna, erunt olim in gloria regni eius, ut cum ipso sint, sicut apostolus ait, et cum ipso maneant. sicut et ipse dominus ad patrem dixit: Volo, ut, ubi ego

### English translation (Claude)

And what power works this death in us but love, which is strong as death? For it so blots out and destroys this world for us that it accomplishes the effect of death through the affection of Christ, turned to whom we are turned away from this world, and living to whom we die to the elements of this world, and do not judge as though living in their sight and use; for our portion is the death of Christ, whose resurrection from the dead we do not lay hold of in glory unless we imitate his death on the cross by mortifying the members and senses of the flesh, so that we may no longer live by our own will but by his, whose will is our sanctification, and who died and rose for us so that we might no longer live for ourselves but for him who died for us and rose again, and gave us his Spirit as the pledge of his promise, just as he placed in heaven the pledge of our life in his own body, which is of our body. Hence now the Lord is our expectation, and our substance, which was made by him, is with him and in him and through him, who was conformed to the body of our lowliness so that he might conform us to the body of his glory and place us with himself in the heavenly places. Therefore those who are worthy of eternal life will one day be in the glory of his kingdom, so as to be with him, as the apostle says, and to remain with him, as the Lord himself said to the Father: “I will that where I

### Scripture references

- Song 8:6: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:20: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Thess 4:3: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:15: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:22: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 39:7 (38:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:21: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 2:6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:17: allusion, high confidence
- John 17:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The sentence continues in 94.6. References: Song 8:6; Col 2:20; Gal 6:14; 1 Thess 4:3; 2 Cor 5:15; 2 Cor 1:22; Ps 39:7 (38:8 LXX); Phil 3:21; Eph 2:6; 1 Thess 4:17; John 17:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.5 (CSEL 34.2:501–502; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-5).

## Letter 94.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:502–504
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus suggests that the risen saints will praise God with real tongues and voices, perhaps in the unutterable angelic speech Paul heard in paradise.

### Latin text

sum, et illi sint mecum, sine dubio illud, quod in psalmis habes: Beati, qui habitant in domo tua; in saecula saeculorum laudabunt te. puto autem hanc laudationem uocibus concinentium esse promendam, etsi inmutabuntur sanctorum resurgentium corpora, ut sint sicut et domini corpus post resurrectionem apparuit, in qua utique resurrectionis humanae uiua imago praefulsit, ut dominus ipse, qui in corpore ipso, quo passus fuerat, et resurrexerat, quasi speculum contemplationis omnibus fuerit. qui utique cum in eadem carne, qua mortuus et sepultus fuerat, et resurrexisset, omnium omnia officia membrorum expressa oculis et auribus hominum saepe conlatus exhibuit. quod si etiam angeli, quorum simpliciter spiritalis est creatura, linguas habere dicuntur, quibus utique laudes domino creatori canant et gratias referre non desinant, quanto magis hominum etsi spiritalia iam post resurrectionem corpora manentibus tamen glorificatae carnis omnibus membris et per omnia membra formis et numeris suis et linguas habebunt in oribus suis et linguis effantibus dabunt uoces, quibus diuinas laudes uel sensuum suorum gaudiorumque affectus per uerba depromant forte etiam hoc gratiae gloriaeque adposituro sanctis suis domino in saeculis regni sui, ut tanto potioribus linguis et uocibus canant, quanto ad beatiorem naturam corporum beata inmutatione profecerint, ut in corporibus iam spiritalibus constituti iam forsitan non humanis sed illis angelicis atque caelestibus, quales apostolus in paradiso audiuit, sermonibus eloquantur! et ideo forsitan homini ineffabiles eos sermones fuisse testatus est, quia sanctis inter alias praemiorum species iam nouae linguae parentur. quibus idcirco homines huius saeculi adhuc uti non licet, ut iam his gloriae suae congruentibus inmortales loquantur, de quibus dictum est: Etenim clamabunt et hymnum dicent procul dubio in caelestibus, ubi cum domino erunt et delectabuntur in abundantia pacis gaudentes in conspectu throni, mittentes ante pedes agni pateras et coronas et cantantes ei canticum nouum adgregati choris angelorum, Virtutum, Dominationum, Thronorum, ut et ipsi cum Cherubin atque Seraphin et quattuor illis animalibus uoce perpetua concinentes dicant: Sanctus, sanctus, sanctus dominus deus sabaoth et reliqua, quae nosti.

### English translation (Claude)

am, they too may be with me.” Without doubt that is what you have in the psalms: “Blessed are those who dwell in your house; for ages of ages they will praise you.” I think this praise will be uttered by the voices of those singing together, even though the bodies of the saints, when they rise, will be changed, so as to be like the Lord's body as it appeared after the resurrection, in which the living image of human resurrection shone out beforehand, so that the Lord himself, in the very body in which he had suffered and risen, was like a mirror of contemplation for all. Since he rose in the same flesh in which he had died and been buried, he often showed, when brought before men's eyes and ears, all the functions of all his members expressly. And if even the angels, whose creation is simply spiritual, are said to have tongues, with which they sing praises to the Lord their creator and never cease giving thanks, how much more will men, though their bodies after the resurrection are spiritual, yet with all the members of the glorified flesh remaining, and in all the members their forms and proportions, have tongues in their mouths and give voice with speaking tongues, with which to utter in words the divine praises or the affections of their senses and joys! Perhaps the Lord will even add this to the grace and glory of his saints in the ages of his kingdom, that they sing with tongues and voices the more excellent the further they have advanced by a blessed change to a more blessed nature of bodies, so that, established in bodies now spiritual, they may perhaps speak no longer in human words but in those angelic and heavenly words such as the apostle heard in paradise! And perhaps he testified that those words were unutterable for man for this reason: that new tongues are being prepared for the saints among the other kinds of rewards. Men of this world are not yet allowed to use them, so that the immortals, of whom it is said, “For they will shout and sing a hymn”, may speak with these tongues befitting their glory; without doubt in the heavenly places, where they will be with the Lord and delight in the abundance of peace, rejoicing before the throne, casting bowls and crowns before the feet of the Lamb and singing a new song to him, joined to the choirs of angels, Powers, Dominions, Thrones, so that they too, together with the Cherubim and Seraphim and those four living creatures, may sing with unceasing voice: “Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts”, and the rest that you know.

### Scripture references

- John 17:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 84:4 (83:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:1: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:4: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 65:13 (64:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 37:11 (36:11 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 4:10: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 5:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 5:9: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:16: allusion, medium confidence
- Isa 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rev 4:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: John 17:24; Ps 84:4 (83:5 LXX); 1 Cor 15:44, 51; 1 Cor 13:1; 2 Cor 12:4; Ps 65:13 (64:14 LXX); Ps 37:11 (36:11 LXX); Rev 4:10; 5:8–9; Col 1:16; Isa 6:3; Rev 4:8. Paulinus's speculation on the bodies of the risen is reported as he gives it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.6 (CSEL 34.2:502–504; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-6).

## Letter 94.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:504–505
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine how angels and the blessed speak, whether “tongues of angels” means literal organs or kinds of speech.

### Latin text

Hoc est ergo, quod egenus et pauper ego ille insipiens et paruulus tuus, quem ut uerus sapiens ferre consuesti, rogo, ut me scientiam uel opinionem super hoc tuam doceas, quia scio te inluminatum spiritu reuelationis ab ipso duce et fonte sapientium, ut, sicut praeterita cognouisti et praesentia uides, ita etiam de futuris aestimes, quid censeas de his caelestium creaturarum uel etiam super caelos in conspectu altissimi agentium uocibus sempiternis, quibus tandem organis exprimantur. quamlibet enim apostolus dicendo: Si linguis angelorum loquar proprium quendam illos suae naturae uel, ut ita dixerim, gentis habere sermonem ostenderit tanto humanis sensibus et eloquiis altiorem, quanto ipsa angelorum creatura et statio mortalibus incolis et terrenis sedibus praestat, at tamen forsitan linguas angelorum pro generibus uocum atque sermonum dixerit, sicut et de charismatum uarietate disserens inter dona gratiarum numerat genera linguarum utique hoc in signo esse significans, quod multarum gentium sermone loqui singulis donaretur. sed et uox dei saepe ad sanctos emissa de nube ostendit posse loquelam esse sine lingua, si quidem lingua corporis membrum sit pusillum et magnum. sed forte ex hoc ipso, quia in hoc membro uocis officium deus posuit, etiam incorporeae angelorum creaturae sermones et uoces linguam uocauerit, sicut scriptura adsolet deo quoque secundum species operationum nomina adsignare membrorum. ora pro nobis et doce nos.

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, is what I, needy and poor, that foolish little one of yours whom you, as truly wise, are accustomed to bear with, ask: that you teach me your knowledge or opinion on this. For I know that you are enlightened by the spirit of revelation from the very leader and fountain of the wise, so that, as you have known the past and see the present, you may also judge of the future: what you think about these everlasting voices of the heavenly creatures, or even of those who act above the heavens in the sight of the Most High, and by what organs they are expressed. For although the apostle, by saying, “If I speak with the tongues of angels”, showed that they have a certain speech proper to their nature, or, so to speak, their race, as much higher than human senses and words as the very creation and station of angels surpasses mortal inhabitants and earthly abodes, yet perhaps he spoke of “tongues of angels” in the sense of kinds of sounds and speech; just as, when discussing the variety of charisms, he numbers kinds of tongues among the gifts of grace, meaning surely that this was given as a sign, that individuals were granted to speak in the language of many nations. But the voice of God, often sent forth to the saints from a cloud, also shows that there can be speech without a tongue, since the tongue is a member of the body, small and great. But perhaps, from the very fact that God placed the function of the voice in this member, he called even the words and voices of the incorporeal creation of angels a tongue, just as Scripture is accustomed to assign the names of members to God as well, according to the kinds of his works. Pray for us and teach us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 40:17 (39:18 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 1:17: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:28: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 17:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Jas 3:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 40:17 (39:18 LXX); Eph 1:17; 1 Cor 13:1; 1 Cor 12:10, 28; Matt 17:5; Jas 3:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.7 (CSEL 34.2:504–505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-7).

## Letter 94.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:505–506
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus excuses his hasty, much-corrected letter because Quintus insisted on leaving at once.

### Latin text

Frater noster carissimus et dulcissimus Quintus quam tarde ad nos remeat a uobis, tam cito a nobis ad uos redire festinat. instantiam uero eius in litteris exigendis etiam haec epistula lituris quam uersibus crebrior loquitur; commemorati exactoris nimiam festinationem scheda fecit; nam pridie Idus Maias uenit ad nos, ut rescripta peteret, et Idibus ante sextam dimitti obtinuit. uidete ergo, utrum eum commendauerim an accusauerim huius modi testimonio. forte enim, immo sine dubio laudabilis magis quam culpabilis iudicabitur, qui a tenebris, quod in comparatione uestri luminis sumus, iustissime refestinauit ad lucem suam.

### English translation (Claude)

Our dearest and sweetest brother Quintus, as slowly as he returns to us from you, so quickly does he hasten to go back from us to you. His insistence in demanding a letter is shown by this very letter, which has more erasures than lines; the excessive haste of the said collector made it a rough draft. For he came to us on the day before the Ides of May to ask for a reply, and on the Ides he obtained leave to be sent off before the sixth hour. See then whether I have commended or accused him by such testimony. Perhaps, or rather without doubt, he will be judged more praiseworthy than blameworthy, who most rightly hurried back from the darkness, which we are compared with your light, to his own light.

### Translation notes

- The Ides of May is 15 May; the letter was finished on 14–15 May (year 408, according to NPNF).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 94.8 (CSEL 34.2:505–506; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/93-47/#p-94-8).

## Letter 95.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:506–507
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, replying to Paulinus and Therasia, rejoices that Possidius is with them, though sad business brought him overseas.

### Latin text

Cum uos fratres nostri coniunctissimi nobis, quos nobiscum desiderati desiderare et salutati resalutare consuestis, assidue uident, non tam augentur bona nostra quam consolantur mala. nam ipsas causas et necessitates, quibus petere transmarina coguntur, non amamus, immo etiam odimus et, quantum ualemus, deuitare conamur et tamen nescio quo modo, credo pro meritis nostris, deesse non possunt; sed cum ad uos ueniunt et uident uos, fit, quod scriptum est: Secundum multitudinem dolorum meorum in corde meo exhortationes tuae iucundauerunt animam meam. proinde ad istam laetitiam, qua uobiscum est frater Possidius, cum ex ipso audieritis, quam tristis eum causa compulerit, hoc me uerissime dicere cognoscetis. et tamen si quisquam nostrum propter hoc solum iret trans mare, ut uestra praesentia frueretur, quid hac causa iustius, quid posset dignius inueniri? sed id uincula nostra non ferrent, quibus religati sumus infirmorum seruire languoribus nec eos praesentia corporali relinquere, nisi cum hoc cogunt tanto imperiosius quanto periculosius aegrotando. utrum exerceamur his, an potius plectamur, nescio, nisi quod non secundum peccata nostra facit nobis neque secundum iniquitates nostras retribuit nobis, qui tanta solatia doloribus miscet agitque mirabili medicina, ne amemus mundum, ne deficiamus in mundo.

### English translation (Claude)

When our brothers, most closely united with us, whom you are accustomed, together with us, to long for when longed for and to greet in return when greeted, see you frequently, our good things are not so much increased as our ills are consoled. For the very business and necessities that compel them to seek lands overseas we do not love; indeed we even hate them and try to avoid them as far as we can; and yet somehow, I believe because of our deserts, they cannot be absent. But when they come to you and see you, what is written comes to pass: “According to the multitude of my sorrows in my heart, your consolations have gladdened my soul.” And so, as for this joy of brother Possidius being with you, when you hear from him what sad business compelled him, you will know that I say this most truly. And yet, if any of us were to go overseas for this reason alone, to enjoy your presence, what cause could be found more just, what more worthy? But our bonds would not allow it, by which we are tied to serving the infirmities of the weak and not leaving them in bodily presence, except when they compel it, the more imperiously the more dangerously they are ill. Whether we are being exercised by these things or rather punished, I do not know; except that he who mingles such great consolations with our sorrows does not deal with us according to our sins, nor repay us according to our iniquities, and acts by a wonderful medicine so that we may not love the world and may not fail in the world.

### Scripture references

- Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 103:10 (102:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's reply to Ep. 94. Possidius, bishop of Calama, had gone to Italy after violence against the Catholics at Calama (408). Quotations: Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX); Ps 103:10 (102:10 LXX). Allusion: 1 John 2:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.1 (CSEL 34.2:506–507; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-1).

## Letter 95.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:507–508
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine agrees that one must die to the world, but asks how to live among worldly people without being drawn into their pleasures, and notes the temptation of inner self-praise.

### Latin text

Quaesiui abs te prioribus litteris, qualisnam tibi uideatur futura aeterna uita sanctorum; sed bene mihi respondisti etiam de praesentis uitae statu adhuc esse utique consulendum, nisi quod me consulere uoluisti, quod aut mecum nescis aut mecum scis aut magis quam ego forsitan scis, quippe qui etiam uerissime dixeris euangelicam mortem prius emoriendum, qua carnalem resolutionem uoluntario praeuenimus excessu non obitu sed sententia recedentes ab huius saeculi uita. simplex haec actio et nullo dubitationis aestu fluctuat, quod ita nos uiuere oportere censemus in hac uita mortali, ut uitae inmortali quodam modo coaptemur. uerum omnis quaestio, quae agentes quaerentesque conturbat homines, qualis ego sum, illa est, quonam modo uiuendum sit uel inter eos uel propter eos, qui nondum uiuere moriendo nouerunt non resolutione corporis sed quodam se a corporalibus inlecebris auertentis mentis affectu. plerumque enim uidetur nobis, quod, nisi eis aliquantulum congruamus ad ea ipsa, unde illos extrahi cupimus, nihil cum eis salubriter agere poterimus. quod cum facimus, talium delectatio subrepit et nobis, ut saepe etiam loqui uana delectet auremque praebere loquentibus nec adridere tantum sed etiam risu uinci ac solui. ita puluereis quibusdam uel etiam luteis affectibus nostras animas praegrauantes laboriosius et pigrius leuamus ad deum, ut uiuamus euangelicam uitam moriendo euangelicam mortem. quod si aliquando successerit, statim subicietur: Euge, euge! non ab hominibus, neque enim quisquam hominum sentit in alio talem mentis agnitionem, sed in quodam intus silentio nescio unde clamatur: Euge, euge! propter hoc genus temptationis ab angelo colaphizatum se tantus apostolus confitetur. ecce unde uita humana super terram tota temptatio est, quando et ibi homo temptatur, ubi, quantum potest, uitae caelestis similitudini coaptatur.

### English translation (Claude)

In my former letter I asked you what you thought the eternal life of the saints will be like; but you answered me well that one must still take counsel about the state of the present life too, except that you wished to consult me about what you either do not know along with me, or know along with me, or perhaps know better than I; for you also said most truly that we must first die the Gospel death, “by which we forestall our bodily dissolution by a voluntary departure, withdrawing from the life of this world not by dying but by resolve.” This course of action is simple and wavers with no surge of doubt, since we judge that we ought so to live in this mortal life as to be in some way fitted to immortal life. But the whole question that troubles men like me, as we act and inquire, is this: how one should live among, or for the sake of, those who do not yet know how to live by dying, not by the dissolution of the body but by an affection of the mind turning itself away from bodily allurements. For it often seems to us that unless we conform ourselves a little to them in the very things from which we wish to draw them out, we can do nothing helpful with them. And when we do this, the delight of such things creeps into us too, so that we often even enjoy talking idly and lending an ear to those who talk, and not only smiling but even being overcome and dissolved by laughter. So, weighing down our souls with dusty or even muddy affections, we lift them to God with more labour and sluggishness, so as to live the Gospel life by dying the Gospel death. And if at some time this succeeds, at once it is suggested: “Well done, well done!”, not by men, for no man perceives such a state of mind in another, but in a kind of inner silence, from I know not where, the cry is raised, “Well done, well done!” Because of this kind of temptation so great an apostle confesses that he was buffeted by an angel. See why human life on earth is wholly temptation, when a man is tempted even where he is fitted, as far as he can be, to the likeness of the heavenly life.

### Scripture references

- Ps 40:15 (39:16 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 12:7: allusion, high confidence
- Job 7:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Paulinus's words from Ep. 94.4. References: Ps 35:21 and 40:15 (34:21, 39:16 LXX, “Well done, well done” as the voice of flatterers); 2 Cor 12:7; Job 7:1 (Latin “temptation”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.2 (CSEL 34.2:507–508; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-2).

## Letter 95.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:508–509
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine confesses daily uncertainty about when and how to punish or forgive in the church, citing conflicting Scriptural commands.

### Latin text

Quid dicam de uindicando uel non uindicando, quando quidem hoc totum ad eorum salutem proficere uolumus, in quos uindicandum uel non uindicandum esse arbitramur? quis etiam sit uindicandi modus non solum pro qualitate uel quantitate culparum uerum etiam pro quibusdam uiribus animorum, quid quisque sufferat, quid recuset, ne non solum non proficiat sed etiam deficiat, quam profundum et latebrosum est! inpendentem quoque uindictam metuentes, quae ab hominibus metuitur, nescio utrum plures correcti sunt, quam in deterius abierunt. quid, cum saepe accidit, ut, si in quemquam uindicaueris, ipse pereat, si inultum reliqueris, alter pereat? ego in his cotidie peccare me fateor et ignorare, quando quoue modo custodiam id, quod scriptum est: Peccantes coram omnibus argue, ut ceteri timorem habeant, et quod scriptum est: Corripe eum inter te et ipsum solum, et quod scriptum est: Nolite ante tempus quemquam iudicare, et quod scriptum est: Nolite iudicare, ut non iudicemini, neque enim hic addidit ante tempus, et quod scriptum est: Tu qui es, qui iudices alienum seruum? suo domino stat aut cadit; stabit autem; potens est enim deus statuere illum, unde confirmat de his se dicere, qui intus sunt. et rursus eos iudicari iubet, cum dicit: Quid enim mihi de his, qui foris sunt, iudicare? nonne de his, qui intus sunt, uos iudicatis? auferte malum ex uobis ipsis. quod cum etiam faciendum uidetur, quatenus fiat, quantae curae ac timoris est, ne forte contingat, quod de illo ipso intellegitur in secunda ad eosdem epistula cauendum admonere, ne maiore tristitia absorbeatur, qui eius modi est! et ne quisquam hoc non multum curandum putaret, ibi ait: Ut non possideamur a satana; non enim ignoramus mentes eius. quis in his omnibus tremor, mi Pauline, sancte homo dei! quis tremor, quae tenebrae! nonne putamus de his esse dictum: Timor et tremor uenerunt super me et contexerunt me tenebrae et dixi: Quis dabit mihi pennas sicut columbae, et uolabo et requiescam? ecce elongaui fugiens et mansi in deserto. uerum tamen etiam in deserto ipso fortassis expertus sit quod adiungit: Expectabam eum, qui me saluum faceret a pusillanimitate et tempestate. nempe ergo temptatio est uita humana super terram.

### English translation (Claude)

What shall I say about punishing or not punishing, since we wish all this to serve the salvation of those whom we judge are to be punished or not punished? And what the measure of punishment should be, not only according to the kind or size of the faults but also according to certain strengths of souls, what each can bear and what he will refuse, lest he not only fail to improve but even fall away: how deep and obscure a matter that is! I do not know, too, whether more have been corrected than have gone to the worse through fear of impending punishment, the kind that is feared from men. What of when it often happens that if you punish someone he himself perishes, and if you leave him unpunished another perishes? I confess that I sin in these things daily, and do not know when or how to keep what is written, “Rebuke those who sin before all, so that the rest may have fear”, and what is written, “Reprove him between you and him alone”, and what is written, “Do not judge anyone before the time”, and what is written, “Judge not, that you be not judged” (for here he did not add “before the time”), and what is written, “Who are you to judge another's servant? To his own master he stands or falls; but he will stand, for God is able to make him stand”; by which he makes clear that he speaks of those who are inside. And again he orders them to be judged, when he says, “For what have I to do with judging those outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? Remove the evil one from among yourselves.” And when this seems necessary to do, how far it should be done, what care and fear it requires, lest there happen what he is understood to warn must be guarded against concerning that very man in his second letter to the same church, that such a one be not swallowed up by excessive sorrow! And so that no one should think this need not much concern us, he says there: “So that we may not be possessed by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs.” What trembling in all these things, my Paulinus, holy man of God! What trembling, what darkness! Do we not think it was said of these things: “Fear and trembling came upon me, and darkness covered me; and I said: Who will give me wings like a dove, and I will fly and be at rest? Behold, I have gone far off in flight and stayed in the wilderness”? Yet perhaps even in the wilderness itself he may have experienced what he adds: “I waited for him who would save me from faintheartedness and storm.” Surely, then, human life on earth is temptation.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:13: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:5 (54:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:6 (54:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:7 (54:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 55:8 (54:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Job 7:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Tim 5:20; Matt 18:15; 1 Cor 4:5; Matt 7:1; Rom 14:4; 1 Cor 5:12–13; 2 Cor 2:7, 11; Ps 55:5–8 (54:6–9 LXX, Old Latin form); Job 7:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.3 (CSEL 34.2:508–509; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-3).

## Letter 95.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:509–510
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine finds Scripture hard to grasp and frank criticism among brothers easily misread as envy; he longs for the solitude of the wilderness.

### Latin text

Quid? ipsa diuina eloquia domini nonne palpantur potius quam tractantur a nobis, dum in multo pluribus quaerimus potius, quid sentiendum sit, quam definitum aliquid fixumque sentimus? et ea cautio cum sollicitudinis plena sit, multo melior est tamen quam temeritas adfirmandi. nonne in multis, si non secundum carnem homo sapiat, quam mortem esse dicit apostolus, magno scandalo erit ei, qui adhuc secundum carnem sapit, ubi et dicere, quid sentias, periculosissimum et non dicere laboriosissimum et aliud, quam sentis, dicere perniciosissimum est? quid? cum ea, quae non adprobamus in eorum, qui intus sunt, sermone uel scriptis........ putantesque id ad fraternae caritatis libertatem pertinere iudicium nostrum non occultamus et hoc non beniuolentia sed inuidia facere credimur, quantum peccatur in nos! et cum similiter eos, qui nostras sententias reprehendunt, laedere potius uelle quam corrigere suspicamur, quantum peccamus in alios! certe hinc existunt inimicitiae plerumque etiam inter carissimas familiarissimasque personas, dum, supra quam scriptum est, unus pro altero inflatur aduersus alterum, et, dum mordent et comedunt inuicem, timendum est, ne consumantur ab inuicem. quis ergo dabit mihi pennas sicut columbae, et uolabo et requiescam? siue enim quia pericula, in quibus quisque uersatur, grauiora sunt quam inexperta siue quia re uera ita est, quaelibet pusillanimitas tempestasque deserti minus mihi uidetur molesta quam ea, quae uel patimur uel timemus in turbis.

### English translation (Claude)

What then? Are not the divine words of the Lord themselves rather felt for than handled by us, since in very many things we seek what we should think rather than think anything defined and fixed? And though that caution is full of anxiety, it is still much better than the rashness of asserting. In many matters, if a man does not think according to the flesh (which the apostle says is death), will he not be a great stumbling block to one who still thinks according to the flesh, where to say what you think is most dangerous, not to say it most burdensome, and to say other than you think most ruinous? What then? When we find in the speech or writings of those who are inside things we do not approve … and, thinking it belongs to the freedom of brotherly love, we do not hide our judgment, and are believed to do this not from goodwill but from envy, how much is sinned against us! And when we similarly suspect that those who criticize our opinions wish to wound rather than correct, how much we sin against others! Certainly from this arise enmities, very often even between the dearest and most intimate persons, when, beyond what is written, one is puffed up for one against another; and while they bite and devour one another, it is to be feared that they may be consumed by one another. “Who then will give me wings like a dove, and I will fly and be at rest?” For whether because the dangers in which each is engaged are heavier than those not experienced, or because it really is so, any faintheartedness and storm of the wilderness seems to me less troublesome than what we either suffer or fear in crowds.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 5:15: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 55:6 (54:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text marks a lacuna with dots after “scriptis”, shown as “…”; the sense is that something is found in others' writings. References: Rom 8:6; 1 Cor 4:6; Gal 5:15; Ps 55:6 (54:7 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.4 (CSEL 34.2:509–510; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-4).

## Letter 95.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:510–511
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he asked about the future life because managing the heavenly city's people now is so uncertain.

### Latin text

Proinde multum adprobo sententiam tuam de huius uitae statu esse agendum uel potius cursu quam statu. addo aliud, quia prius hoc requirendum atque tenendum est quam illud. quale futurum sit, quo iste fert cursus. inde ergo interrogaui, quid sentias, quasi de huius uitae recta regula retenta atque seruata iam securissimus, cum in tam multis maximeque in his, quae breuiter, ut potui, commemoraui, periculosissime laborare me sentiam. sed quia omnis haec ignorantia et difficultas hinc mihi uidetur existere, quod in magna uarietate morum et animorum et inter occultissimas uoluntates atque infirmitates hominum rem populi gerimus non terreni atque Romani sed Hierosolymitani caelestis, magis me libuit loqui tecum ex illo, quod erimus, quam ex isto, quod sumus; ibi enim etsi nescimus quae bona futura sunt, tamen non parua in re certi sumus, quod ista mala ibi non erunt.

### English translation (Claude)

So I strongly approve your view that we should deal with the state of this life, or rather its course than its state. I add something else: that this must first be sought and held, before that other question of what that will be like to which this course carries us. I asked you about that, then, as if I were already quite secure about having kept and observed the right rule of this life, when in so many things, and especially in those I have briefly mentioned as best I could, I feel myself labouring most dangerously. But because all this ignorance and difficulty seems to me to arise from the fact that, amid a great variety of characters and minds and among the most hidden wills and weaknesses of men, we manage the affairs of a people not earthly and Roman but of the heavenly Jerusalem, I preferred to speak with you about what we shall be rather than what we are; for there, even if we do not know what good things will come, we are certain of no small thing, that these evils will not be there.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.5 (CSEL 34.2:510–511; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-5).

## Letter 95.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:511
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine states the general rules of Christian living and that grace determines what each can do, and asks Paulinus to seek counsel on living among men.

### Latin text

De agenda ergo ista temporali uita eo modo, per quem ueniendum est ad aeternam, noui concupiscentias carnales esse frenandas tantumque remittendum in delectationes sensuum corporalium, quantum sustentandae huius agendaeque uitae satis est, omnesque molestias temporales pro ueritate dei et salute aeterna nostra et proximi patienter fortiterque tolerandas. noui etiam proximo ad hoc consulendum omni studio caritatis, ut istam uitam recte gerat propter aeternam; praeponenda etiam nobis spiritalia carnalibus, incommutabilia mutabilibus et haec omnia tanto magis minusue posse hominem, quanto magis minusue adiuuatur gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. cur autem ille sic ille autem sic adiuuetur uel non adiuuetur, nescio; id tamen deum summa sibique nota aequitate facere scio. propter illa uero, quae supra commemoraui, quem ad modum uiuendum sit cum hominibus, si quid tibi exploratum liquet, edoce me, obsecro;. sin et te ita ut me mouent ista, confer ea cum aliquo mansueto cordis medico, siue illic inueneris, ubi degitis, siue cum Romam toto anniuersario pergitis, et, quod per illum tibi loquentem seu uobis conloquentibus dominus aperuerit, scribe mihi.

### English translation (Claude)

As to living this temporal life in the way by which one must come to the eternal, I know that carnal desires must be bridled, and that only so much indulgence must be given to the pleasures of the bodily senses as suffices for sustaining and living this life, and that all temporal troubles must be borne patiently and bravely for the truth of God and the eternal salvation of ourselves and our neighbour. I know also that we must care for our neighbour with every effort of love, so that he may live this life rightly for the sake of the eternal; that the spiritual must be preferred by us to the carnal, the unchangeable to the changeable; and that a man is more or less able to do all these things according as he is more or less helped by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. But why this one is helped in this way, and that one in that way, or not helped, I do not know; yet I know that God does it with supreme justice, known to himself. But concerning the things I mentioned above, how one should live with men, if anything is clear and certain to you, teach me, I beg you. But if these things trouble you as they do me, discuss them with some meek physician of the heart, whether you find him there where you live or when you go to Rome on your yearly visit, and write to me what the Lord reveals through him speaking to you or through your conversing together.

### Translation notes

- On grace given to one and not another by a justice known to God, translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.6 (CSEL 34.2:511; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-6).

## Letter 95.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:511–512
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds that risen bodies will be spiritual and incorruptible, able to eat by power and not necessity, as Christ did after his resurrection.

### Latin text

De resurrectione autem corporum membrorumque in illa incorruptione atque inmortalitate futuris officiis quoniam uicissim me interrogasti, quid sentiam, audi breuiter, quod, si non satis erit, poterit, si dominus adiuuerit, latius disputari. firmissime tenendum est, unde scripturae sanctae uerax et clara sententia est, uisibilia ista corpora atque terrena, quae nunc animalia dicuntur, spiritalia futura in resurrectione fidelium atque iustorum. porro spiritalis corporis qualitas inexperta nobis quem ad modum uel comprehendi uel insinuari possit, ignoro. corruptio ibi certe nulla erit ac per hoc nec isto, quo nunc indigent, corruptibili cibo tunc indigebunt nec tamen eum capere non poterunt ueraciterque consumere potestate, non necessitate; alioquin nec dominus eum post resurrectionem accepisset, qui nobis ita praebuit corporalis resurrectionis exemplum, ut hinc apostolus dicat: Si mortui non resurgunt, neque Christus resurrexit. qui cum membris omnibus appareret eorumque officiis uteretur, loca etiam uulnerum demonstrauit. quas ego cicatrices, non ipsa uulnera semper accepi et eas ipsas potestate, non necessitate. cuius potestatis facilitatem tunc maxime ostendit, cum uel in alia forma se demonstrauit uel in domo discipulis constitutis, cum ostia clausa essent, uerus apparuit.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the resurrection of bodies and the functions of the members in that incorruption and immortality, since you in turn asked me what I think, hear it briefly; if it is not enough, it can be discussed more fully, if the Lord helps. It must be held most firmly, since the truthful and clear teaching of holy Scripture says so, that these visible and earthly bodies, which are now called natural, will be spiritual in the resurrection of the faithful and righteous. But how the quality of a spiritual body, which we have not experienced, can be either grasped or conveyed, I do not know. Certainly there will be no corruption there, and therefore they will not then need this corruptible food which they now need; yet they will not be unable to take it and truly consume it, by power, not by necessity. Otherwise the Lord would not have taken it after his resurrection, he who gave us such an example of bodily resurrection that the apostle says from it: “If the dead do not rise, neither has Christ risen.” When he appeared with all his members and used their functions, he also showed the places of his wounds. I have always taken these to be scars, not the wounds themselves, and these too by power, not by necessity. The ease of this power he showed most of all when he either showed himself in another form or appeared, truly himself, to the disciples gathered in a house when the doors were shut.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:16: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:42: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:27: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 16:12: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:19: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: 1 Cor 15:44; 1 Cor 15:16; Luke 24:39–43; John 20:27; Mark 16:12; John 20:19, 26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.7 (CSEL 34.2:511–512; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-7).

## Letter 95.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:512–513
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine leaves open whether angels have bodies, but holds that in the city of the saints praise will be voiced harmoniously in spiritual bodies, with no thought hidden.

### Latin text

Hinc oritur de angelis quaestio, utrum habeant corpora suis officiis et conuersationibus congrua, an tantum modo spiritus sint. si enim habere dixerimus, occurrit nobis: Qui facit angelos suos spiritus; si autem non habere dixerimus, plus habet scrupuli, quo modo scriptum sit eos corporeis hominum sensibus sine corpore praesentatos, hospitio susceptos, pedes eis lotos, edentibus et bibentibus ministratum. facilius enim uideri potest sic esse spiritus angelos dictos ut homines animas, sicut scriptum est cum Iacob in Aegyptum tot animas descendisse — neque enim corpora non habebant —, quam ut illa omnia sine corporibus gesta credantur. deinde certa quaedam in Apocalypsi angeli statura definitur in ea mensura, quae nisi corporum esse non possit, at, quod hominibus apparuerunt, non ad falsitatem sed ad illam potestatem ac facilitatem spiritalium corporum referatur. sed siue habeant angeli corpora siue quisquam possit ostendere, quem ad modum corpora non habentes gerere illa omnia potuerint, in illa tamen ciuitate sanctorum, ubi etiam per Christum redempti a generatione hac in aeternum coniungentur milibus angelorum, uoces corporales non latentes animos indicabunt, quia in illa societate diuina nihil cogitationis proximo poterit occultari, sed erit consonans in dei laude concordia non solum spiritu uerum etiam spiritali corpore expressa.

### English translation (Claude)

From this arises the question about angels, whether they have bodies suited to their functions and ways of life, or are only spirits. For if we say they have bodies, we meet: “Who makes his angels spirits”; but if we say they do not, there is more difficulty in how it is written that they presented themselves without a body to men's bodily senses, were received as guests, had their feet washed, and were served as they ate and drank. For it can more easily seem that angels are called spirits in the way men are called souls, as it is written that so many souls went down with Jacob into Egypt (for they were not without bodies), than that all those things should be believed to have been done without bodies. Again, in the Apocalypse a certain definite stature of an angel is defined by a measure which can belong only to bodies; and that they appeared to men should be referred not to falsehood but to that power and ease of spiritual bodies. But whether angels have bodies, or someone can show how they could do all those things without having bodies, in that city of the saints, where those redeemed through Christ from this generation for ever will be joined to the thousands of angels, bodily voices will express minds that are not hidden, since in that divine society no thought can be hidden from one's neighbour; but there will be a harmonious concord in God's praise, expressed not only in spirit but also in the spiritual body.

### Scripture references

- Ps 104:4 (103:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Heb 1:7: quotation, medium confidence
- Gen 18:4: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 18:8: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 46:27: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 21:17: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 12:7 (11:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 104:4 (103:4 LXX), cited in Heb 1:7; Gen 18:2–8; Gen 19:1–3; Gen 46:27; Rev 21:17; Ps 12:7 (11:8 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.8 (CSEL 34.2:512–513; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-8).

## Letter 95.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:513–514
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks for better answers if Paulinus has them, and reminds him of the unanswered questions about Christian leisure.

### Latin text

Hoc mihi interim uidetur. si quid congruentius ueritati uel iam tenes uel a doctioribus audire potueris, per te nosse studiosissime expecto. recense sane epistulam meam, cui quoniam festinantissime te respondisse de diaconi festinatione causatus es, ideo non conqueror, sed potius commemoro, ut, quod tunc omissum est, nunc reddatur. et de otio quippe Christiano ad percipiendam uel disserendam Christianam sapientiam quid sentias et de otio, quod putabam, tuo, cuius mihi occupationes incredibiles nuntiatae sunt, require et uide, quid a te scire quaesierim. [Et alia manu: Memores nostri felices uiuite magna gaudia et solatia nostra, sancti dei.

### English translation (Claude)

This is how it seems to me for the present. If you either already hold something more consistent with the truth or can hear it from more learned men, I await most eagerly to learn it through you. Do go over my letter again: since you pleaded the deacon's haste as the reason why you replied to it in great haste, I do not complain, but rather remind you, so that what was then omitted may now be supplied. Look again and see what I asked to know from you, both what you think about Christian leisure for learning or discussing Christian wisdom, and about your own leisure, as I supposed it, though I have been told of your incredible occupations. [And in another hand:] Remember us and live happily, our great joys and consolations, saints of God.

### Translation notes

- The bracketed words “And in another hand” mark the closing greeting written in Augustine's own hand; they are a note in the edition, not a deletion.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 95.9 (CSEL 34.2:513–514; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-95-9).

## Letter 96.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:514
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine congratulates the court official Olympius on his reported promotion and urges him to use his power for the heavenly city.

### Latin text

Quicquid sis secundum saeculi huius cursum, nos tamen carissimo et sincerissimo conseruo nostro Olympio Christiano fidissime scribimus. hoc enim tibi esse scimus omni gloria gloriosius et omni sublimitate sublimius. fama quippe ad nos pertulit honorem te adeptum esse celsiorem, quae utrum uera esset, nondum apud nos fuerat confirmatum, cum haec scribendi prouenit occasio. sed quoniam nouimus te a domino didicisse non alta sapere sed humilibus consentire, quolibet culmine prouectus esses, non aliter, quam soles, litteras nostras te accepturum esse praesumimus, domine dilectissime et in Christi membris honorabiliter amplectende fili. temporali uero felicitate ad aeterna lucra te prudenter usurum minime dubitamus, ut, quanto plus potes in hac terrena re publica, tanto plus inpendas caelesti illi, quae te in Christo peperit. ciuitati, quod tibi uberius rependatur in regione uiuentium et in uera pace securorum ac sine fine gaudiorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Whatever you may be according to the course of this world, we write with complete confidence to our dearest and most sincere fellow servant Olympius, a Christian; for we know that this is to you more glorious than any glory and more exalted than any eminence. For report has brought us word that you have obtained a higher office; whether this was true had not yet been confirmed among us when this opportunity of writing came. But since we know that you have learned from the Lord not to mind high things but to agree with the humble, we presume that, to whatever height you have been raised, you will receive our letter no differently from your usual way, my most beloved lord and son, to be embraced with honour among the members of Christ. Nor do we at all doubt that you will use your temporal good fortune wisely for eternal gains, so that the more power you have in this earthly commonwealth, the more you will spend for that heavenly city which has given birth to you in Christ, that it may be repaid to you more richly in the land of the living and in the true peace of those secure in joys without end.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 27:13 (26:13 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Olympius was a high official (magister officiorum) at the court of Honorius after the fall of Stilicho in 408. References: Rom 12:16; Ps 27:13 (26:13 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 96.1 (CSEL 34.2:514; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-1).

## Letter 96.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:514–516
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine renews the request of Bishop Boniface of Cataqua that the emperor grant his church small estates which his predecessor Paul had bought fraudulently while in debt to the treasury.

### Latin text

Sancti fratris et coepiscopi mei Bonifatii petitionem tuae rursus caritati commendo, ne forte nunc fieri possit, quod ante non potuit. cum enim posset sine ulla forsitan quaestione, quod praecessor eius quamuis sub alieno nomine comparauerat et sub ecclesiae nomine possidere iam coeperat, consequenter etiam ipse retinere, nolumus ergo, quoniam fisci debitor fuit, hunc scrupulum habere in conscientia. neque enim fraus ista quia fisco fiebat ideo non fiebat. et ille quidem Paulus, postquam episcopus factus est, renuntiaturus suis omnibus rebus propter inmensum cumulum fiscalium debitorum exacta quadam cautione, in qua ei certum pondus debebatur argenti, hos exiguos agellos, unde uictum sustentaret, tamquam ecclesiae comparauit sub nomine tunc potentissimae domus, ut etiam ei ipsis morem suum sequens, cum fisco non solueret, nullas exactorum molestias pateretur. iste autem, qui eidem ecclesiae illo defuncto est ordinatus, timuit hos agros suscipere et, cum possit pro solis fiscalibus debitis, quae de memoratis possessiunculis ille contraxerat, imperiale beneficium postulare, totum maluit confiteri, quod eas Paulus de argento proprio, cum esset fisco obnoxius, de hastario emerat, ut eas ecclesia, si fieri potest, non occulta episcopi iniquitate sed manifesta Christiani imperatoris liberalitate possideat. quod si fieri non potest, melius inopiae laborem serui dei tolerant, quam ut necessariorum facultatem cum conscientia fraudis obtineant.

### English translation (Claude)

I commend again to your Charity the petition of my holy brother and fellow bishop Boniface, in case what could not be done before can be done now. For although he could perhaps, without any question, have kept as a matter of course what his predecessor had bought, though under another's name, and had already begun to possess under the name of the church, we do not wish him, since that man was a debtor to the treasury, to have this scruple on his conscience. For that fraud was not the less a fraud because it was done against the treasury. That Paul, after he was made bishop, being about to give up all his property because of the immense heap of debts he owed the treasury, having called in a certain bond under which a fixed weight of silver was owed to him, bought these small plots of land, from which to support himself, as if for the church, under the name of a household that was then very powerful, so that, following his custom even in these, he might suffer no trouble from the tax collectors while not paying the treasury. But this man, who was ordained for the same church after his death, was afraid to take over these lands; and though he could have asked for an imperial remission for the treasury debts alone which the other had incurred on the said little properties, he preferred to confess everything: that Paul had bought them at public auction with his own silver while he was liable to the treasury; so that the church may possess them, if it can be done, not through the hidden iniquity of a bishop but through the open liberality of a Christian emperor. If that cannot be done, the servants of God would rather endure the hardship of poverty than obtain the means of necessities with a conscience of fraud.

### Translation notes

- Boniface was bishop of Cataqua (see Ep. 97.3); his predecessor Paul is otherwise unknown. The phrase “ut etiam ei ipsis” is unclear in the digital text and is translated by sense (“even in these”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 96.2 (CSEL 34.2:514–516; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-2).

## Letter 96.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:516
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Olympius to support the renewed petition, which would be praised as Christian piety.

### Latin text

Ad hoc tuum suffragium petimus impertire digneris, quia id, quod primo impetratum est, noluit allegare, ne iterum supplicandi sibi intercluderet facultatem; non enim erat ad desiderata responsum. nunc uero cum sis eadem benignitate, qua soles, sed amplior potestate, non desperamus adiuuante domino meritis tuis hoc facile posse concedi, cum, etiam si tuo nomine eadem loca peteres et memoratae ecclesiae ipse donares, quis reprehenderet aut quis non maxime praedicaret petitionem tuam non terrenae cupiditati sed Christianae pietati seruientem? domini dei nostri misericordia te in Christo feliciorem tueatur, domine fili.

### English translation (Claude)

For this we ask you to be so good as to grant your support, since he did not wish to present what was obtained at first, lest he shut himself off from the possibility of petitioning again; for it was not an answer to what he desired. But now that you are of the same kindness as usual, but greater in power, we do not despair that, with the Lord's help, this can easily be granted through your merits. For even if you asked for the same lands in your own name and gave them yourself to the said church, who would blame you, or who would not highly praise your petition as serving not earthly greed but Christian piety? May the mercy of the Lord our God keep you ever happier in Christ, my lord son.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 96.3 (CSEL 34.2:516; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-96-3).

## Letter 97.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:516–517
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Olympius with confidence after receiving his letter offering help to the church.

### Latin text

Quamuis mox, ut audiuimus te merito sublimatum, cum ipsa fama nondum certissima nobis esset, nihil aliud de animo tuo credidimus erga ecclesiam dei, cuius te ueraciter filium esse gaudemus, quam quod tuis litteris mox aperuisti, tamen etiam illis lectis, quibus ultro dignatus es, etiam si pigri et cunctantes essemus, exhortationem beniuolentissimam mittere, ut instruente humilitate nostra per religiosam oboedientiam tuam dominus, cuius munere talis es, ecclesiae suae iam iamque subueniat, maiore fiducia tibi scribimus, domine eximie et merito praestantissime multumque in Christi caritate honorande fili.

### English translation (Claude)

As soon as we heard that you had been deservedly raised to high office, though the report itself was not yet quite certain to us, we believed nothing else of your mind toward the church of God, whose son we rejoice that you truly are, than what you soon revealed in your letter. Yet, having read that letter too, in which you deigned of your own accord to send us a most kindly exhortation, even if we were sluggish and hesitant, that, with our lowliness instructing you, the Lord, by whose gift you are what you are, might through your devout obedience come at once to the help of his church, we write to you with greater confidence, my excellent lord and deservedly most distinguished son, much to be honoured in the love of Christ.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Olympius (see Ep. 96).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 97.1 (CSEL 34.2:516–517; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-1).

## Letter 97.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:517
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Olympius to hasten a declaration that the laws against idols and heretics issued under Stilicho were the emperor's own will.

### Latin text

Et fratres quidem multi sancti collegae mei grauiter ecclesia perturbata profecti sunt paene fugientes ad gloriosissimum comitatum, quos siue iam uideris siue litteras eorum ab urbe Roma opportunitate cuiusquam occasionis acceperis, ego tamen, licet nullum consilium cum eis communicare potuerim, non potui praetermittere per hunc fratrem et conpresbyterum meum, qui urgenti necessitate pro salute ciuis sui etiam media hieme quomodocumque ad illas partes uenire compulsus est, et salutare et admonere caritatem tuam, quam habes in Christo Iesu domino nostro, ut opus tuum bonum diligentissima acceleretur instantia, quo nouerint inimici ecclesiae leges illas, quae de idolis confringendis et haereticis corrigendis uiuo Stilichone in Africam missae sunt, uoluntate imperatoris piissimi et fidelissimi constitutas; quo nesciente uel nolente factum siue dolose iactant siue libenter putant atque hinc animos inperitorum turbulentissimos reddunt nobisque periculose ac uehementer infestos.

### English translation (Claude)

Many brothers, my holy colleagues, set out, almost fleeing, to the most glorious court, because the church has been gravely disturbed. Whether you have already seen them or have received their letters from the city of Rome through some convenient opportunity, I nevertheless, though I could share no counsel with them, could not fail, through this brother and fellow presbyter of mine, who by urgent necessity for the safety of a fellow citizen has been compelled to come to those parts somehow even in mid-winter, both to greet and to admonish your Charity, which you have in Christ Jesus our Lord, that your good work be hastened with most diligent urgency: so that the enemies of the church may know that those laws which were sent to Africa while Stilicho was alive, about breaking idols and correcting heretics, were established by the will of the most pious and faithful emperor. They either cunningly spread it about, or gladly believe, that this was done without his knowledge or against his will, and in this way they make the minds of the ignorant most turbulent and dangerously and violently hostile to us.

### Translation notes

- Stilicho, the Western general, was executed in August 408; the opponents of the church claimed his laws had lapsed with him. The laws against pagan worship and heretics are referred to as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 97.2 (CSEL 34.2:517; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-2).

## Letter 97.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:517–519
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, on behalf of the African bishops, urges Olympius to have the emperor confirm the laws quickly, before the bishops sent to court arrive.

### Latin text

Hoc autem, quod petendo uel suggerendo admoneo praestantiam tuam, non dubito omnium per Africam collegarum meorum fieri uoluntate. arbitror quacumque primitus exorta occasione facillime posse ac debere maturari, ut nouerint, sicut dixi, homines uani, quorum et aduersantium salutem requirimus, et leges, quae pro ecclesia Christi missae sunt, magis Theodosii filium quam Stilichonem curasse mittendas. propterea quippe memoratus presbyter harum perlator, cum de regione sit Mileuitana, ab episcopo suo uenerabili fratre meo Seuero, qui tuam mecum sincerissimam dilectionem multum salutat, per Hipponem-Regium, ubi ego sum, transire iussus est, quia, cum forte simul essemus in magnis ecclesiae tribulationibus et perturbationibus, quaerebamus occasionem scribendi ad eximietatem tuam et non inueniebamus. iam quidem unam epistulam miseram in negotio sancti fratris et collegae mei Bonifatii episcopi Cataquensis; sed nondum ad nos peruenerant grauiora, quae nos uehementius agitarent, quibus comprimendis uel corrigendis quem ad modum meliore secundum uiam Christi consilio succurratur, commodius episcopi, qui propterea nauigauerunt, cum tanta benignitate tui cordis acturi sunt, qui potuerunt communi consilio diligentius deliberatum aliquid ferre, quantum temporis permittebat angustia. illud tamen, quo animum clementissimi et religiosissimi principis erga ecclesiam prouincia nouerit, nullo modo esse differendum, sed etiam antequam episcopos, qui profecti sunt, uideas, quam primum tua praestantissima pro Christi membris in tribulatione maxima constitutis uigilantia potuerit, accelerandum suggero, peto, obsecro, flagito. neque enim paruum in his malis solatium dominus obtulit, quod te uoluit multo amplius posse, quam poteras, quando iam de tuis multis et magnis bonis operibus gaudebamus.

### English translation (Claude)

And this which I urge on your Excellency by asking or suggesting I do not doubt is the will of all my colleagues throughout Africa. I think it can and should very easily be hastened on whatever occasion first arises, so that, as I said, vain men, whose salvation we seek even when they oppose us, may know that the laws sent for the church of Christ were sent by the care of the son of Theodosius rather than of Stilicho. That is why the said presbyter, the bearer of this letter, though he is from the region of Milevis, was ordered by his bishop, my venerable brother Severus, who greets your most sincere Affection warmly together with me, to pass through Hippo Regius, where I am; for, when we happened to be together in great tribulations and disturbances of the church, we were looking for an opportunity of writing to your Excellency and did not find one. I had indeed already sent one letter on the business of my holy brother and colleague Boniface, bishop of Cataqua; but the graver matters, which disturbed us more violently, had not yet reached us. How these may be repressed or corrected with better counsel according to the way of Christ will be more suitably dealt with, with the great kindness of your heart, by the bishops who sailed for that purpose, who were able, by common counsel, to bring something more carefully deliberated, as far as the shortness of time allowed. But that by which the province may know the mind of the most clement and religious emperor toward the church must in no way be delayed; rather, even before you see the bishops who have set out, I suggest, ask, beseech and implore that it be hastened as soon as your most excellent vigilance can manage, for the members of Christ placed in the greatest tribulation. For the Lord has offered no small consolation in these evils, in that he willed you to have much more power than you had when we were already rejoicing over your many great good works.

### Translation notes

- The son of Theodosius is the emperor Honorius. Severus was bishop of Milevis; Boniface bishop of Cataqua (Ep. 96).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 97.3 (CSEL 34.2:517–519; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-3).

## Letter 97.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:519–520
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many have been converted through the laws, and Augustine fears for their perseverance under attack; he asks Olympius to pass a memorandum to the bishops.

### Latin text

Multum sane de quorundam neque paucorum fide firma et stabili gratulamur, qui ex occasione legum ipsarum ad Christianam religionem uel catholicam pacem conuersi sunt, pro quorum salute sempiterna nos in hac temporali etiam periclitari delectat. propterea enim maxime ab hominibus nimium durumque peruersis nunc inimicitiarum grauiores impetus sustinemus, quos nonnulli eorum nobiscum patientissime sustinent; sed plurimum infirmitati metuimus, donec discant et ualeant adiuuante misericordissima gratia domini saeculum praesens et hominum diem robore cordis ualentiore contemnere. commonitorium, quod misi, fratribus episcopis, si, ut puto, nondum ibi sunt, ab eximietate tua illis tradatur, cum uenerint. tantam quippe tui sincerissimi pectoris habemus fiduciam, ut adiuuante domino deo nostro non solum impertitorem auxilii te uelimus uerum etiam consilii participem.

### English translation (Claude)

We rejoice greatly over the firm and steadfast faith of some, and those not few, who, on the occasion of these very laws, have been converted to the Christian religion or to Catholic peace; for whose eternal salvation we are glad to be in danger even in this temporal life. For it is chiefly for this reason that we now endure the heavier attacks of enmity from men who are excessively and harshly perverse, attacks which some of them endure most patiently with us; but we greatly fear for their weakness, until they learn and become able, with the help of the most merciful grace of the Lord, to despise the present world and the day of man with a stronger heart. Let the memorandum I have sent to the brother bishops be handed to them by your Excellency when they come, if, as I think, they are not yet there. For we have such confidence in your most sincere heart that, with the help of the Lord our God, we wish you to be not only a giver of help but also a sharer in counsel.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:3: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “The day of man” alludes to 1 Cor 4:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 97.4 (CSEL 34.2:519–520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/95-1/#p-97-4).

## Letter 98.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:520–521
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Boniface that parents who offer baptized infants to demons cannot bind them with their sin, since inherited guilt comes only from Adam, in whom all were one.

### Latin text

Quaeris a me, utrum parentes baptizatis paruulis suis noceant, cum eos daemoniorum sacrificiis sanare conantur, et, si non nocent, quo modo eis prosit, cum baptizantur, parentum fides, quorum eis non potest obesse perfidia. ubi respondeo tantam illius sacramenti, hoc est baptismi salutaris esse uirtutem in sancta compage corporis Christi, ut semel generatus per aliorum carnalem uoluptatem, cum semel regeneratus fuerit per aliorum spiritalem uoluntatem, deinceps non possit uinculo alienae iniquitatis obstringi, cui nulla sua uoluntate consentit. et anima enim patris mea est, inquit, et anima filii mea est. anima, quae peccauerit, ipsa morietur. non autem peccat ipsa, cum parentes ei omnino nescienti uel quilibet alius adhibet sacrilegia daemoniorum, sed ideo ex Adam traxit, quod sacramenti illius gratia solueretur, quia nondum erat anima separatim uiuens, id est altera anima, de qua diceretur: Et anima patris mea est et anima filii mea est. iam itaque cum homo in se ipso est ab eo, qui genuit, alter effectus, peccato alterius sine sua consensione non tenetur obnoxius. traxit ergo reatum, quia unus erat cum illo et in illo, a quo traxit, quando, quod traxit, admissum est; non autem trahit alter ab altero, quando sua unoquoque propria uita uiuente iam est, unde dicatur: Anima, quae peccauerit, ipsa morietur.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask me whether parents harm their baptized little ones when they try to heal them by sacrifices to demons; and if they do not harm them, how the faith of the parents profits them when they are baptized, when their parents' faithlessness cannot hurt them. To this I answer that the power of that sacrament, that is, of saving baptism, in the holy structure of the body of Christ is so great that one who has once been begotten through the carnal pleasure of others, once he has been regenerated through the spiritual will of others, cannot thereafter be bound by the chain of another's iniquity to which he does not consent by any will of his own. “For the soul of the father is mine,” he says, “and the soul of the son is mine; the soul that sins, it shall die.” It does not itself sin when its parents, or anyone else, apply sacrileges of demons to it while it is wholly unaware. But it drew from Adam what would be loosed by the grace of that sacrament, because it was not yet a soul living separately, that is, another soul, of which it could be said, “Both the soul of the father is mine and the soul of the son is mine.” So now, when a man is in himself, made other than him who begot him, he is not held liable for another's sin without his own consent. He drew guilt, then, because he was one with him and in him from whom he drew it, when what he drew was committed; but one does not draw from another when each is already living his own life, so that it may be said: “The soul that sins, it shall die.”

### Scripture references

- Ezek 18:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Boniface, a bishop (NPNF: Boniface, ca. 408). Quotation: Ezek 18:4. On original sin drawn from Adam, translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.1 (CSEL 34.2:520–521; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-1).

## Letter 98.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:521–523
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The one Holy Spirit makes others' faith profit the infant at baptism, but sin cannot be shared that way, so baptismal grace is lost only by the child's own later sins.

### Latin text

Ut autem possit regenerari per officium uoluntatis alienae, cum offertur consecrandus, facit hoc unus spiritus, ex quo regeneratur oblatus. non enim scriptum est: <Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex parentum uoluntate aut ex offerentium uel ministrantium fide) sed: Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu. aqua igitur exhibens forinsecus sacramentum gratiae et spiritus operans intrinsecus beneficium gratiae, soluens uinculum culpae, reconcilians bonum naturae regenerant hominem in uno Christo ex uno Adam generatum. regenerans ergo spiritus in maioribus offerentibus et paruulo oblato renatoque communis est; ideo per hanc societatem unius eiusdemque spiritus prodest offerentium uoluntas paruulo oblato. quando autem in paruulum maiores peccant offerentes eum atque obligare conantes daemonum sacrilegis uinculis, non est anima utrorumque communis, ut etiam culpam possint habere communem. non enim sic communicatur culpa per alterius uoluntatem, quem ad modum communicatur gratia per sancti spiritus unitatem. potest enim et in hoc et in illo homine esse unus spiritus sanctus, etiam si inuicem nesciant. per quem sit utriusque gratia communis; non autem potest spiritus hominis esse et huius et illius, per quem peccante altero et altero non peccante sit tamen culpa communis. ac per hoc potest paruulus semel ex parentum carne generatus dei spiritu regenerari, ut ex illis obligatio contracta soluatur; non potest autem semel dei spiritu regeneratus ex parentum carne regenerari, ut obligatio, quae soluta est, iterum contrahatur. et ideo semel perceptam paruulus Christi gratiam non amittit nisi propria impietate, si aetatis accessu tam malus euaserit. tunc enim etiam propria incipiet habere peccata, quae non regeneratione auferantur, sed alia curatione sanentur.

### English translation (Claude)

But that he can be regenerated through the service of another's will, when he is offered to be consecrated, is the work of the one Spirit, from whom the one offered is regenerated. For it is not written, “Unless one is born again of the will of the parents or of the faith of those who offer or minister”, but, “Unless one is born again of water and the Spirit.” So the water, presenting outwardly the sacrament of grace, and the Spirit, working inwardly the benefit of grace, loosing the bond of guilt, reconciling the good of nature, regenerate in the one Christ the man begotten from the one Adam. The regenerating Spirit, then, is common to the older people who offer and to the little one offered and reborn; therefore, through this fellowship of one and the same Spirit, the will of those who offer profits the little one offered. But when older people sin against the little one by offering him and trying to bind him with sacrilegious bonds of demons, the soul of both is not common, so that they could also have guilt in common. For guilt is not shared through another's will in the way grace is shared through the unity of the Holy Spirit. For the one Holy Spirit can be in this man and in that one, even if they do not know each other, through whom grace is common to both; but the spirit of a man cannot be both this man's and that man's, so that, when one sins and the other does not, the guilt is nevertheless common. And so a little one once begotten from the flesh of his parents can be regenerated by the Spirit of God, so that the obligation contracted from them is loosed; but once regenerated by the Spirit of God he cannot be regenerated from the flesh of his parents, so that the obligation which has been loosed is contracted again. And therefore the little one does not lose the grace of Christ once received, except by his own ungodliness, if with the advance of age he turns out so evil. For then he will begin to have his own sins too, which are not taken away by regeneration but healed by another cure.

### Scripture references

- John 3:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 3:5. “Another cure” refers to repentance (penance) for sins after baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.2 (CSEL 34.2:521–523; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-2).

## Letter 98.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:523–524
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Such parents are spiritual murderers in intent, but, as Cyprian's On the Lapsed implies, the infants themselves lose nothing before God.

### Latin text

Verum tamen recte dicuntur parentes uel quicumque maiores filios seu quoslibet paruulos baptizatos daemoniorum sacrilegiis obligare conantes spiritaliter homicidae. nam in illis quidem interfectionem non faciunt, sed, quantum in ipsis est, interfectores fiunt. recte illis dicitur, quando ab hoc scelere prohibentur: Nolite occidere paruulos uestros, dicit enim et apostolus: Spiritum nolite extinguere, non quia ille extingui potest, sed, quantum in ipsis est, extinctores eius merito dicuntur, qui sic agunt, ut extinctum uelint. isto sensu recte intellegi potest, quod scripsit beatissimus Cyprianus in epistula de lapsis, cum eos, qui tempore persecutionis idolis immolauerant, arguens: Ac ne quid deesset, inquit, ad criminis cumulum, infantes quoque parentum manibus inpositi uel adtracti amiserunt paruuli quod in primo statim natiuitatis exordio fuerant consecuti. amiserunt, dixit, quantum adtinuit ad illorum scelus, a quibus amittere coacti sunt; amiserunt in eorum mente ac uoluntate, qui in illos tantum facinus commiserunt; nam si in se ipsis amisissent, remansissent utique diuina sententia sine ulla defensione damnandi. quod si sanctus Cyprianus arbitraretur, non eorum defensionem continuo subiceret dicens: Nonne illi, cum iudicii dies uenerit, dicent: Nos nihil fecimus nec derelicto cibo et poculo domini ad profana contagia sponte properauimus; perdidit nos aliena perfidia, parentes sensimus parricidas; illi nobis ecclesiam matrem, illi patrem dominum negauerunt, ut, dum parui et inprouidi et tanti facinoris ignari per alios ad consortium criminis iungimur, aliena fraude caperemur? hanc defensionem non subnecteret, nisi iustissimam crederet et in dei iudicio paruulis profuturam. si enim uere dicitur: Nos nihil fecimus; anima, quae peccauerit, ipsa morietur, nec illi peribunt sub dei iusto iudicio, quos parentes suo scelere, quantum ad se ipsos adtinet, perdiderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Nevertheless, parents or any older people who try to bind their baptized children or any little ones by sacrileges of demons are rightly called spiritual murderers. For they do not indeed commit murder in them, but, as far as lies in them, they become murderers. It is rightly said to them when they are forbidden this crime, “Do not kill your little ones”; for the apostle too says, “Do not quench the Spirit”, not because he can be quenched, but those are rightly called his quenchers, as far as lies in them, who act so as to wish him quenched. In this sense one can rightly understand what the most blessed Cyprian wrote in his letter on the lapsed, when, rebuking those who had sacrificed to idols in the time of persecution, he says: “And so that nothing might be lacking to the heap of crime, infants too, placed in or dragged by their parents' hands, lost as little ones what they had obtained at the very beginning of their birth.” “They lost,” he said, as far as concerned the crime of those by whom they were forced to lose it; they lost in the mind and will of those who committed so great a crime against them; for if they had lost it in themselves, they would surely have remained to be condemned by the divine sentence without any defence. If holy Cyprian had thought this, he would not have added their defence immediately, saying: “Will they not say, when the day of judgment comes: ‘We did nothing, nor did we leave the food and cup of the Lord and hasten of our own accord to profane contagion; another's faithlessness ruined us; we found our parents parricides; they denied us the church as mother and the Lord as father, so that, while small and unwary and ignorant of so great a crime, we were joined through others to a partnership in crime, we were caught by another's fraud’?” He would not have attached this defence unless he believed it most just and of profit to the little ones in God's judgment. For if it is truly said, “We did nothing; the soul that sins, it shall die”, neither will those perish under God's just judgment whom their parents, as far as concerns themselves, have destroyed by their crime.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:19: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 18:4: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 9 (On the Lapsed): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Thess 5:19; Cyprian, On the Lapsed 9; Ezek 18:4. “Do not kill your little ones” is not an exact biblical quotation (source unidentified).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.3 (CSEL 34.2:523–524; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-3).

## Letter 98.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:524–526
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The infant in Cyprian's story who spat out the Eucharist was a divine sign to the adults, like Balaam's ass, not an act of the child's knowledge.

### Latin text

Illud uero, quod in eadem commemoratur epistula quandam paruulam turbatis in fuga parentibus nutrici derelictam atque ab eadem nutrice daemonum sacrilegiis impactam postea in ecclesia inlatam sibi eucharistiam miris motibus respuisse, ideo mihi uidetur diuinitus factum, ne maiores putarent nihil se in paruulos illa iniquitate peccare, sed potius intellegerent per illum significantem quodam modo gestum corporis eorum, qui loqui non poterant, se mirabiliter admoneri, quid ipsi facere deberent, qui post tantum illud nefas sacramentis salutaribus inruebant, unde se utique paenitendo abstinere deberent. nec cum tale aliquid diuina prouidentia per infantulos agit, ipsos id agere scientia uel ratione credendum est. neque enim, quia cuiusdam prophetae dementiam deus uoluit etiam asina loquente cohercere, ideo iam miranda est asinorum sapientia. porro si per animal inrationale sonuit aliquid homini simillimum, quod miraculo diuino, non cordi asinino tribuendum sit, ita potuit omnipotens per infantis animam, non ubi ratio nulla erat, sed ubi adhuc sopita erat, gestu corporis eius ostendere, quid illi, qui et in se et in paruulos suos peccauerant, curare deberent. ceterum cum infans non redeat in parentem, ut cum illo et in illo unus homo sit, sed omnino alter sit habens carnem suam et animam suam, anima, quae peccauerit, ipsa morietur.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what is related in the same letter, that a little girl, left with a nurse by her parents, who were in confusion as they fled, and forced by that same nurse into the sacrileges of demons, afterwards in church spat out the Eucharist brought to her with strange movements: this seems to me to have been done by God, so that older people should not think they commit no sin against little ones by that iniquity, but rather understand that through that significant movement of the body of those who could not speak they were being wonderfully warned what they themselves ought to do, who after so great a crime were rushing to the saving sacraments, from which they certainly ought to have abstained by doing penance. Nor, when divine providence does some such thing through little infants, is it to be believed that they do it by knowledge or reason. For because God willed to restrain the madness of a certain prophet even by a speaking ass, the wisdom of asses is not therefore to be admired. And if through an irrational animal there sounded something very like a man, which is to be attributed to a divine miracle and not to an ass's heart, so the Almighty could, through the soul of an infant, not where there was no reason but where it was still asleep, show by the movement of its body what those who had sinned both against themselves and their little ones ought to attend to. For the rest, since the infant does not return into the parent, so as to be one man with him and in him, but is altogether another, having his own flesh and his own soul, “the soul that sins, it shall die.”

### Scripture references

- Num 22:28: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Pet 2:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 18:4: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 25 (On the Lapsed): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Cyprian, On the Lapsed 25; Num 22:28; 2 Pet 2:16; Ezek 18:4. Infant communion is reported as in Cyprian's account.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.4 (CSEL 34.2:524–526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-4).

## Letter 98.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:526–527
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Infants are truly regenerated even if presented for bodily healing, because the whole church, through the Holy Spirit, offers them; even heretics' baptism is valid.

### Latin text

Nec illud te moueat, quod quidam non ea fide ad baptismum percipiendum paruulos ferunt, ut gratia spiritali ad uitam regenerentur aeternam, sed quod eos putant hoc remedio temporalem retinere uel recipere sanitatem. non enim propterea illi non regenerantur, quia non ab istis hac intentione offeruntur. celebrantur enim per eos necessaria ministeria et uerba sacramentorum, sine quibus consecrari paruulus non potest. spiritus autem ille sanctus, qui habitat in sanctis, ex quibus una illa columba deargentata caritatis igne conflatur; agit, quod agit, etiam per seruitutem aliquando non solum simpliciter ignorantium uerum etiam damnabiliter indignorum. offeruntur quippe paruuli ad percipiendam spiritalem gratiam non tam ab eis, quorum gestantur manibus, quamuis et ab ipsis, si et ipsi boni fideles sunt, quam ab uniuersa societate sanctorum atque fidelium. ab omnibus namque offerri recte intelleguntur, quibus placet, quod offeruntur, et quorum sancta atque indiuidua caritate ad communicationem sancti spiritus adiuuantur. tota hoc ergo mater ecclesia, quae in sanctis est. facit, quia tota omnes, tota singulos parit. nam si Christiani baptismi. sacramentum, quando unum atque id ipsum est, etiam apud haereticos ualet et sufficit ad consecrationem, quamuis ad uitae aeternae participationem non sufficiat, quae consecratio reum quidem facit haereticum extra domini gregem habentem dominicum characterem, corrigendum tamen admonet sana doctrina, non iterum similiter consecrandum, quanto potius in catholica ecclesia etiam per stipulae ministerium frumenta purganda portantur, ut ad massae societatem mediante area perducantur!

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it trouble you that some bring little ones to receive baptism not with the faith that they may be regenerated to eternal life by spiritual grace, but because they think that by this remedy they may keep or recover bodily health. For the little ones are not therefore not regenerated because they are not offered by these people with this intention. For through them the necessary ministries and words of the sacraments are celebrated, without which a little one cannot be consecrated. But that Holy Spirit who dwells in the saints, from whom that one silvered dove is fused together by the fire of love, does what he does even through the service, sometimes, not only of those who are simply ignorant but even of those damnably unworthy. For little ones are offered to receive spiritual grace not so much by those in whose hands they are carried (though by them too, if they too are good believers) as by the whole society of the saints and believers. For they are rightly understood to be offered by all who are pleased that they are offered and by whose holy and undivided love they are helped toward the communion of the Holy Spirit. This the whole mother church, which is in the saints, does, because the whole of her gives birth to all and the whole of her to each. For if the sacrament of Christian baptism, when it is one and the same, is valid even among heretics and suffices for consecration, though it does not suffice for participation in eternal life (a consecration that makes the heretic guilty, having the Lord's mark outside the Lord's flock, yet sound doctrine warns that he is to be corrected, not consecrated again in the same way), how much more in the Catholic Church is the wheat carried, to be cleansed, even by the service of straw, so that by means of the threshing floor it may be brought into the fellowship of the heap!

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:13 (67:14 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Ps 68:13 (67:14 LXX, the silvered dove); Matt 3:12. The doctrine of the baptismal mark (character) is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.5 (CSEL 34.2:526–527; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-5).

## Letter 98.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:527–528
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Infants need not be presented by their own parents; masters, rescuers of exposed children and consecrated virgins also present them, like the Good Samaritan.

### Latin text

Illud autem nolo te fallat, ut existimes reatus uinculum ex Adam tractum aliter non posse disrumpi, nisi paruuli ad percipiendam Christi gratiam a parentibus offerantur; sic enim scribens dicis: Ut, sicut parentes fuerunt auctores ad eorum poenam, per fidem parentum identidem iustificentur, cum uideas multos non offerri a parentibus sed etiam a quibuslibet extraneis, sicut a dominis seruuli aliquando offeruntur. et nonnumquam mortuis parentibus suis paruuli baptizantur ab eis oblati, qui in illis huius modi misericordiam praebere potuerunt. aliquando etiam, quos crudeliter parentes exposuerint, nutriendi a quibuslibet, nonnumquam a sacris uirginibus colliguntur et ab eis offeruntur ad baptismum, quae certe proprios filios nec habuerunt ullos nec habere disponunt. ac per hoc nihil aliud hic fieri uides, nisi quod in euangelio scriptum est, cum dominus interrogasset, quis illi a latronibus sauciato et semiuiuo in uia derelicto proximus fuisset; responsum est enim: Qui in illum fecit misericordiam.

### English translation (Claude)

But I do not want you to be misled into thinking that the bond of guilt drawn from Adam cannot be broken unless little ones are offered by their parents to receive the grace of Christ; for you write: “so that, as the parents were the authors of their punishment, they may in turn be justified through the faith of the parents.” For you see that many are offered not by their parents but even by any strangers, as little slaves are sometimes offered by their masters. And sometimes, when their parents are dead, little ones are baptized when offered by those who were able to show them mercy of this kind. Sometimes too those whom their parents cruelly exposed are picked up to be reared by anyone, sometimes by holy virgins, and offered by them for baptism, though these certainly neither had any children of their own nor intend to have any. And so you see nothing else done here but what is written in the Gospel, when the Lord asked who had been neighbour to the man wounded by robbers and left half dead on the road; for the answer was: “He who showed mercy to him.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 10:37: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Luke 10:36–37. Augustine quotes Boniface's letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.6 (CSEL 34.2:527–528; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-6).

## Letter 98.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:528–529
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Boniface asks how sponsors can answer that an infant believes and turns to God when they cannot say whether he will be chaste or honest.

### Latin text

Difficillimam sane quaestionem tibi proposuisse uisus es in extremo inquisitionis tuae ea uidelicet intentione, qua soles uehementer cauere mendacium. si constituam, inquis, ante te paruulum et interrogem, utrum, cum creuerit, futurus sit castus uel fur non sit futurus, sine dubio respondebis: Nescio, et utrum in eadem paruula aetate constitutus cogitet aliquid boni uel mali, dices: Nescio. si itaque de moribus eius futuris nihil audes certi promittere et de eius praesenti cogitatione, quid est illud, quod, quando ad baptismum offeruntur, pro eis parentes tamquam fidedictores respondent et dicunt illos facere, quod illa aetas cogitare non potest aut, si potest, occultum est? interrogamus enim eos, a quibus offeruntur, et dicimus: Credit in deum? de illa aetate, quae, utrum sit deus, ignorat; respondent: Credit; et ad cetera sic respondetur singula, quae geruntur. unde miror parentes in istis rebus tam fidenter pro paruulo respondere, ut dicant eum facere tanta bona, quae ad horam, qua baptizatur, baptizator interrogat; tamen eadem hora si subiciam: Erit castus, qui baptizatur, aut non erit fur? nescio utrum audet aliquis dicere, aliquid horum erit aut non erit, sicut mihi sine dubitatione respondet, quod credat in deum et quod se conuertat ad deum. deinde tua scripta concludens adiungis et dicis: Ad istas ergo quaestiones peto breuiter respondere digneris, ita ut non. mihi de consuetudine praescribas, sed rationem reddas.

### English translation (Claude)

At the end of your inquiry you thought you were putting to me a very difficult question, with that intention, namely, with which you are accustomed strongly to guard against lying. “If I set a little one before you,” you say, “and ask whether, when he grows up, he will be chaste or will not be a thief, you will no doubt answer, ‘I do not know’; and whether, at that same tender age, he is thinking anything good or bad, you will say, ‘I do not know.’ If, then, you dare promise nothing certain about his future conduct or about his present thought, what is it that, when they are offered for baptism, the parents answer for them as sponsors and say that they do what that age cannot think, or, if it can, it is hidden? For we ask those by whom they are offered and say, ‘Does he believe in God?’ of that age which does not know whether God exists; they answer, ‘He believes’; and so they answer to each of the other questions that are asked. So I am amazed that parents in these matters answer so confidently for the little one as to say that he does such great good things as the baptizer asks at the hour he is baptized; yet if at that same hour I were to add, ‘Will the one being baptized be chaste, or will he not be a thief?’, I do not know whether anyone dares to say that any of these will or will not be, as he answers me without hesitation that he believes in God and that he turns himself to God.” Then, concluding your letter, you add: “To these questions, then, I ask you to be so good as to answer briefly, in such a way that you do not cite custom to me but give a reason.”

### Translation notes

- The baptismal interrogations (“Does he believe in God?”, renunciation and turning to God) are quoted as Boniface gives them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.7 (CSEL 34.2:528–529; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-7).

## Letter 98.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:529–530
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls Nebridius's dislike of short answers to great questions, but agrees to answer Boniface briefly since both are busy bishops.

### Latin text

His litteris tuis lectis et relectis et, quantum sinebant temporis angustiae, consideratis recordatus sum Nebridium amicum meum, qui cum esset rerum obscurarum ad doctrinam pietatis maxime pertinentium diligentissimus et acerrimus inquisitor, ualde oderat de quaestione magna responsionem breuem. et quisquis id poposcisset, aegerrime ferebat eumque, si eius persona pateretur, uultu indignabundus et uoce cohibebat indignum deputans, qui talia quaereret, cum, de re tanta quam multa dici possent deberentque, nesciret. sed ego tibi non similiter, ut solebat ille, suscenseo; es enim episcopus multis curis occupatus ut ego; unde nec tibi facile uacat prolixum aliquid legere nec mihi scribere. nam ille tunc adulescens, qui talia breuiter nolebat audire et de me multa in nostra sermocinatione quaerebat, ab otioso quaerebat otiosus; tu uero cogitans nunc, quis et a quo ista flagites, breuiter de re tanta respondere me iubes. ecce facio, quantum possum; dominus adiuuet, ut, quod postulas, possim.

### English translation (Claude)

Having read and reread this letter of yours and considered it as far as the shortness of time allowed, I remembered my friend Nebridius, who, being a most diligent and acute inquirer into obscure matters, especially those that pertain to the teaching of piety, greatly hated a short answer to a great question. And whoever demanded one, he took it very ill, and, if the person's standing allowed, he would check him with an indignant look and voice, thinking unworthy one who asked such things when he did not know how much could and should be said on so great a matter. But I am not angry with you as he used to be; for you are a bishop occupied with many cares, as I am, so that neither have you much leisure to read anything long nor I to write it. For he, then a young man, who did not want to hear such things briefly and asked me many things in our conversations, was asking at leisure of one at leisure; but you, considering now who is asking these things and of whom, bid me answer briefly on so great a matter. See, I do it as far as I can; may the Lord help me to be able to do what you ask.

### Translation notes

- Nebridius was Augustine's friend from youth (died ca. 391), the recipient of Epp. 3–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.8 (CSEL 34.2:529–530; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-8).

## Letter 98.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:530–531
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sacraments take the names of what they signify, as Easter is called the day of the passion and the sacrament of Christ's body is called his body; so the sacrament of faith is called faith.

### Latin text

Nempe saepe ita loquimur, ut pascha propinquante dicamus crastinam uel perendinam domini passionem, cum ille ante tam multos annos passus sit nec omnino nisi semel illa passio facta sit. nempe ipso die dominico dicimus: Hodie dominus resurrexit, cum, ex quo resurrexit, tot anni transierint. cur nemo tam ineptus est, ut nos ita loquentes arguat esse mentitos, nisi quia istos dies secundum illorum, quibus haec gesta sunt, similitudinem nuncupamus, ut dicatur ipse dies, qui non est ipse sed reuolutione temporis similis eius, et dicatur illo die fieri propter sacramenti celebrationem, quod non illo die sed iam olim factum est? nonne semel immolatus est Christus in se ipso et tamen in sacramento non solum per omnes paschae sollemnitates sed omni die populis immolatur nec utique mentitur, qui interrogatus eum responderit immolari? si enim sacramenta quandam similitudinem rerum earum, quarum sacramenta sunt, non haberent, omnino sacramenta non essent. ex hac autem similitudine plerumque iam ipsarum rerum nomina accipiunt. sicut ergo secundum quendam modum sacramentum corporis Christi corpus Christi est, sacramentum sanguinis Christi sanguis Christi est, ita sacramentum fidei fides est. nihil est autem aliud credere quam fidem habere. ac per hoc cum respondetur paruulus credere, qui fidei nondum habet affectum, respondetur fidem habere propter fidei sacramentum et conuertere se ad deum propter conuersionis sacramentum, quia et ipsa responsio ad celebrationem pertinet sacramenti, sicut de ipso baptismo apostolus: Consepulti, inquit, sumus Christo per baptismum in mortem; non ait: Sepulturam significauimus), sed prorsus ait: Consepulti sumus. sacramentum ergo tantae rei non nisi eiusdem rei uocabulo nuncupauit.

### English translation (Claude)

We often speak in such a way that, as Easter approaches, we say that tomorrow or the day after is the Lord's passion, though he suffered so many years ago and that passion took place only once. On the Lord's day itself we say, “Today the Lord rose”, though so many years have passed since he rose. Why is no one so foolish as to accuse us of lying when we speak so, except that we name these days according to their likeness to those on which these things were done, so that a day is called that very day which is not that day but is like it by the revolution of time, and something is said to happen on that day because of the celebration of the sacrament which did not happen on that day but long ago? Was not Christ sacrificed once in himself, and yet in the sacrament he is sacrificed for the peoples not only on all the solemnities of Easter but every day; and he certainly does not lie who, when asked, answers that he is being sacrificed. For if sacraments did not have a certain likeness to those things of which they are sacraments, they would not be sacraments at all. And from this likeness they generally receive the names of the things themselves. As, then, in a certain way the sacrament of Christ's body is Christ's body, and the sacrament of Christ's blood is Christ's blood, so the sacrament of faith is faith. And to believe is nothing other than to have faith. And so, when it is answered that a little one believes who does not yet have the disposition of faith, it is answered that he has faith because of the sacrament of faith, and that he turns himself to God because of the sacrament of conversion; for the answer itself belongs to the celebration of the sacrament. So the apostle says of baptism itself: “We were buried together with Christ through baptism into death.” He does not say, “We signified burial”, but plainly says, “We were buried together.” He named the sacrament of so great a thing by no other word than that of the thing itself.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Rom 6:4. Augustine's statements on the daily sacrifice and on the sacrament of the body being “in a certain way” Christ's body are translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.9 (CSEL 34.2:530–531; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-9).

## Letter 98.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:531–533
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The infant is made faithful by the sacrament of faith, which protects him and, if he dies before reason, frees him from Adam's condemnation.

### Latin text

Itaque paruulum etsi nondum fides illa, quae in credentium uoluntate consistit, iam tamen ipsius fidei sacramentum fidelem facit. nam sicut credere respondentur, ita etiam fideles uocantur non rem ipsam mente adnuendo sed ipsius rei sacramentum percipiendo. cum autem sapere homo coeperit, non illud sacramentum repetet, sed intelleget eiusque ueritati consona etiam uoluntate coaptabitur. hoc quam diu non potest, ualebit sacramentum ad eius tutelam aduersus contrarias potestates et tantum ualebit, ut, si ante maioris usum ex hac uita emigrauerit, per ipsum sacramentum commendante ecclesiae caritate ab illa condemnatione, quae per unum hominem intrauit in mundum, Christiano adiutorio liberetur. hoc qui non credit et fieri non posse arbitratur, profecto infidelis est, etsi habeat fidei sacramentum, longeque melior est ille paruulus, qui, etiam si fidem nondum habet in cogitatione, non ei tamen obicem contrariae cogitationis opponit, unde sacramentum eius salubriter percipit. respondi, sicut existimo, quaestionibus tuis, quantum adtinet ad minus capaces et contentiosos, non satis, quantum autem ad pacatos et intellegentes, plus forte quam satis. nec tibi ad excusationem meam obieci firmissimam consuetudinem, sed saluberrimae consuetudinis reddidi, quam potui, rationem.

### English translation (Claude)

So, even if that faith which consists in the will of believers does not yet make a little one faithful, the sacrament of that faith does. For as they are answered for as believing, so too they are called faithful, not by assenting to the thing itself in their mind but by receiving the sacrament of the thing itself. But when a man begins to understand, he will not repeat that sacrament, but will understand it and conform himself to its truth by an agreeing will as well. As long as he cannot do this, the sacrament will avail for his protection against the opposing powers, and will avail so much that, if he departs this life before the use of reason, he will be freed by Christian help, through the sacrament itself, commended by the love of the church, from that condemnation which entered the world through one man. Whoever does not believe this and thinks it cannot be done is surely an unbeliever, even if he has the sacrament of faith; and far better is that little one who, even if he does not yet have faith in his thought, does not set against it the obstacle of a contrary thought, so that he receives its sacrament to his salvation. I have answered your questions, as I think, not sufficiently for the less capable and the contentious, but for the peaceable and intelligent perhaps more than sufficiently. Nor have I set against you in my excuse the very firm custom, but I have given, as well as I could, the reason for a most wholesome custom.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Rom 5:12. The teaching on the necessity of infant baptism is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 98.10 (CSEL 34.2:531–533; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-98-10).

## Letter 99.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:533–534
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, writing to the widow Italica, regrets that she sent no news of the sufferings at Rome, since sharing tribulation is part of love.

### Latin text

Tres epistulas tuae benignitatis acceperam, cum ista rescripsi: unam, quae adhuc meas litteras exigebat, alteram, quae ad te iam peruenisse indicabat, tertiam, quae beniuolentissimam pro nobis curam tuam etiam de domo clarissimi et egregii iuuenis Iuliani, quae nostris adhaeret parietibus, continebat. qua accepta continuo respondere non distuli, quia procurator eximietatis tuae cito se Romam posse mittere scripsit. cuius litteris grauiter contristati sumus, quod ea, quae illic in urbe uel circa urbem geruntur, non nobis insinuare curauit, ut certum apud nos fieret, quod incertae famae credere nolebamus. fratrum quippe litteris ante transmissis quamuis molesta et dura multo tamen leuiora nuntiata sunt. plus sane, quam dici potest, miratus sum, quod nec tanta occasione hominum tuorum fratres sancti episcopi scripserint nec epistula tua quicquam nobis de tantis tribulationibus uestris insinuauerit, quae utique per uiscera caritatis et nostrae sunt, nisi forte faciendum non putasti, quod nihil prodesse duxisti aut nos tuis litteris maestificari noluisti. prodest aliquid, quantum ego arbitror, etiam ista cognoscere, primo quia iniustum est gaudere uelle cum gaudentibus et flere non uelle cum flentibus, deinde quia tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia probationem, probatio spem, spes autem non confundit, quia caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

I had received three letters from your Kindness when I wrote this reply: one still asking for a letter from me, a second indicating that mine had already reached you, and a third containing your most kindly care for us concerning the house of the most distinguished and excellent young man Julian, which adjoins our walls. On receiving this I did not put off replying at once, because the agent of your Excellency wrote that he could send to Rome quickly. We were greatly saddened by his letter, because he took care to inform us of what is happening there in the City or around the City, so that what we were unwilling to believe on uncertain report has become certain to us. For in letters from the brothers sent earlier, things were reported that were distressing and hard, but much lighter. I was more amazed than can be said that, with so good an opportunity offered by your people, neither did the holy brother bishops write, nor did your letter tell us anything of your great tribulations, which, through the bowels of love, are certainly ours too; unless perhaps you thought it should not be done because you judged it would do no good, or did not wish to sadden us by your letter. It does some good, in my judgment, to know even these things: first, because it is unjust to wish to rejoice with those who rejoice and not to wish to weep with those who weep; second, because “tribulation works patience, patience proof, proof hope; and hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.”

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 12:15: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Italica, a noble Roman widow (NPNF heading), during Alaric's siege of Rome (408–409). Quotations: Rom 12:15; Rom 5:3–5. Allusion: Phil 2:1. The digital text reads “non nobis insinuare curauit” (“did not take care to inform us”), but the context (the news is now certain and worse than earlier reports) requires the positive sense, which is translated; the “non” may be a slip.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 99.1 (CSEL 34.2:533–534; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-1).

## Letter 99.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:534–535
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sharing in others' sufferings lightens them through love, and God consoles those who fight in hope of the crown.

### Latin text

Absit itaque, ut recusemus audire, etiam quae amara et tristia sunt erga carissimos nostros. nescio quo enim modo minus fit, quod patitur unum membrum, si compatiuntur alia membra. nec ipsa mali releuatio fit per communionem cladis sed per solatium caritatis, ut, quamuis alii ferendo patiuntur, alii cognoscendo compatiuntur, communis sit tamen tribulatio, quibus probatio, spes, dilectio spiritusque communis est. omnes autem nos dominus consolatur, qui et haec temporalia mala praedixit et post haec bona aeterna promisit. nec debet, cum proeliatur, infringi, qui uult post proelium coronari, uiret illo subministrante certantibus, qui praeparat ineffabilia dona uictoribus.

### English translation (Claude)

Far be it from us, then, to refuse to hear even bitter and sad things concerning our dearest ones. For somehow what one member suffers becomes less if the other members suffer with it. And this relief of the evil comes not through sharing the disaster but through the comfort of love, so that, though some suffer by bearing and others suffer with them by knowing, the tribulation is nevertheless common to those who have proof, hope, love and the Spirit in common. And the Lord consoles us all, who both foretold these temporal evils and promised eternal goods after them. Nor ought he who wishes to be crowned after the battle to be broken while he fights; he is strong when he who prepares unutterable gifts for the victors supplies strength to those who contend.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 12:26: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: 1 Cor 12:26; 2 Tim 2:5. The last clause (“uiret illo subministrante”) is compressed in the Latin; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 99.2 (CSEL 34.2:534–535; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-2).

## Letter 99.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:535
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine greets Italica's children and explains that the house requested from the church at Hippo cannot be given, since it is old church property.

### Latin text

Rescripta illa nostra non tibi ad nos auferant scribendi fiduciam, praesertim quia timorem nostrum non inprobabili defensione lenisti. paruulos tuos resalutamus et in Christo tibi grandescere optamus, qui iam in hac aetate cernunt, quam sit amor huius saeculi periculosus et noxius. atque utinam, cum magna et dura quatiuntur, parua et flexibilia corrigantur. de domo illa quid dicam, nisi benignissimae tuae curae gratias agam? nam eam, quam dare possumus, nolunt, quam uolunt autem, dare non possumus. neque enim, sicut falso audierunt, a decessore meo relicta est ecclesiae, sed inter antiqua eius praedia possidetur et antiquae alteri ecclesiae sic cohaeret quem ad modum ista, qua de agitur, alteri.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not let that reply of ours take away your confidence in writing to us, especially since you have soothed our fear with a not unreasonable defence. We return the greetings of your little ones and pray that they may grow up for you in Christ; already at this age they see how dangerous and harmful is the love of this world. And would that, when great and hard things are shaken, small and pliant things may be corrected! As for that house, what shall I say but give thanks for your most kindly care? For the house we can give they do not want, and the one they want we cannot give. For it was not, as they have falsely heard, left to the church by my predecessor; it is held among the church's ancient estates, and adjoins one ancient church just as the one in question adjoins the other.

### Translation notes

- The predecessor is Valerius, bishop of Hippo before Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 99.3 (CSEL 34.2:535; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-99-3).

## Letter 100.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-100-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:535–537
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine welcomes the new proconsul Donatus but begs him not to punish Donatist crimes against the church with the full severity, still less with death.

### Latin text

Nollem quidem in his afflictionibus esse Africanam ecclesiam constitutam, ut terrenae ullius potestatis indigeret auxilio. sed quia, sicut apostolus dicit, non est potestas nisi a deo, procul dubio, cum per uos sincerissimos catholicae matris filios eidem subuenitur, auxilium nostrum in nomine domini est, qui fecit caelum et terram. quis enim non sentiat in tantis malis non paruam nobis consolationem diuinitus missam, cum tu uir talis et Christi nominis amantissimus proconsularibus es sublimatus insignibus. ut ab sceleratis et sacrilegis ausibus inimicos ecclesiae bonae tuae uoluntati potestas sociata cohiberet. domine eximie meritoque honorabilis insigniterque laudabilis fili? denique unum solum est, quod in tua iustitia pertimescimus, ne forte, quoniam, quicquid mali contra Christianam societatem ab hominibus impiis ingratisque committitur, profecto grauius est et atrocius, quam si in alios talia committantur, tu quoque pro immanitate facinorum ac non potius pro lenitatis Christianae consideratione censeas cohercendum. quod te per ipsum Christum ne facias obsecramus. neque enim uindictam de inimicis in hac terra requirimus aut uero ad eas angustias animi nos debent coartare, quae patimur, ut obliuiscamur, quid nobis praeceperit, pro cuius ueritate ac nomine patimur; diligimus inimicos nostros et oramus pro eis. unde ex occasione terribilium iudicum ac legum, ne in aeterni iudicii poenas incidant, corrigi eos cupimus, non necari; nec disciplinam circa eos neglegi uolumus nec supplicia, quae digna sunt, exerceri. sic ergo eorum peccata compesce, ut sint, quos paeniteat peccauisse.

### English translation (Claude)

I would not wish the African church to be placed in such afflictions that it needed the help of any earthly power. But since, as the apostle says, “there is no power except from God”, without doubt, when help is brought to it through you, most sincere sons of the Catholic mother, “our help is in the name of the Lord, who made heaven and earth.” For who would not feel that in such great evils no small consolation has been sent us from God, when you, such a man and a most devoted lover of the name of Christ, have been raised to the insignia of proconsul, so that power joined to your good will might restrain the enemies of the church from their wicked and sacrilegious attempts, my excellent lord, deservedly honourable and notably praiseworthy son? In short, there is only one thing we fear in your justice: that perhaps, since whatever evil is committed by ungodly and ungrateful men against the Christian society is certainly graver and more atrocious than if such things were committed against others, you too may think it should be punished according to the monstrousness of the crimes, and not rather with regard to Christian gentleness. We beg you by Christ himself not to do this. For we do not seek vengeance on our enemies on this earth, nor ought what we suffer to narrow our minds so much that we forget what he commanded us for whose truth and name we suffer: we love our enemies and pray for them. Hence, through the occasion of terrible judges and laws, we wish them to be corrected, lest they fall into the penalties of the eternal judgment, not to be put to death; we wish neither that discipline toward them be neglected nor that the punishments they deserve be inflicted. So restrain their sins in such a way that there may be people to repent of having sinned.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:1: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 124:8 (123:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Donatus, proconsul of Africa (408–409). Quotations: Rom 13:1; Ps 124:8 (123:8 LXX). Allusion: Matt 5:44. Augustine's plea against capital punishment of the Donatists is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 100.1 (CSEL 34.2:535–537; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-100-1).

## Letter 100.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-100-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:537–539
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Donatus to renounce the death penalty for Donatists, to publish that the laws remain in force, and to have them instructed by documents rather than merely compelled.

### Latin text

Quaesumus igitur, ut, cum ecclesiae causas audis, quamlibet nefariis iniuriis appetitam uel afflictam esse cognoueris, potestatem occidendi te habere obliuiscaris, petitionem nostram non obliuiscaris. non tibi uile sit neque contemptibile, fili honorabiliter dilectissime, quod uos rogamus, ne occidantur, pro quibus dominum rogamus, ut corrigantur. excepto etiam, quod a perpetuo proposito recedere non debemus uincendi in bono malum, illud quoque prudentia tua cogitet, quod causas ecclesiasticas insinuare uobis nemo praeter ecclesiasticos curat. proinde si occidendos in his homines putaueritis, deterrebitis nos, ne per operam nostram ad uestrum iudicium aliquid tale perueniat, quo comperto illi in nostram perniciem licentiore audacia grassabuntur necessitate nobis impacta, ut etiam occidi ab eis eligamus, quam eos occidendos uestris iudiciis ingeramus. hanc admonitionem, petitionem, obsecrationem meam ne, quaeso, aspernanter accipias. neque enim te arbitror non recolere magnam me ad te et multo, quam nunc es, altius sublimatum, etiam si episcopus non essem, fiduciam tamen habere potuisse. cito interim per edicta excellentiae tuae nouerint haeretici Donatistae manere leges contra errorem suum latas, quas iam nihil ualere arbitrantur et iactant, ne uel sic nobis parcere aliquatenus possint. plurimum autem labores et pericula nostra, quo fructuosa sint, adiuuabis, si eorum uanissimam et impiae superbiae plenissimam sectam non ita cures imperialibus legibus comprimi, ut sibi uel suis uideantur qualescumque molestias pro ueritate atque iustitia sustinere, sed eos, cum hoc abs petitur, rerum certarum manifestissimis documentis apud acta uel praestantiae tuae uel minorum iudicum conuinci atque instrui patiaris, ut et ipsi, qui te iubente adtinentur, duram, si fieri potest, flectant in melius uoluntatem et ea ceteris salubriter legant. onerosior est quippe quam utilior diligentia, quamuis ut magnum deseratur malum et magnum bonum teneatur, cogi tantum homines, non doceri.

### English translation (Claude)

We ask, therefore, that when you hear the church's cases, however nefarious the injuries with which you learn it has been attacked or afflicted, you forget that you have the power to put to death, but do not forget our petition. Do not think it a cheap or contemptible thing, my most beloved son, to be honoured, that we ask you that those should not be put to death for whom we ask the Lord that they may be corrected. Besides the fact that we must not depart from our constant purpose of overcoming evil with good, let your prudence consider this too: that no one but churchmen takes care to bring church cases before you. Therefore, if you think men should be put to death in these cases, you will deter us from letting any such case come before your court through our efforts; and when they learn this, they will rage for our destruction with more unbridled boldness, since the necessity will be laid on us of choosing even to be killed by them rather than to bring them before your courts to be killed. I beg you not to receive this admonition, petition and entreaty of mine with disdain. For I do not think you fail to remember that I could have had great confidence in approaching you, even had you been raised much higher than you now are, even if I were not a bishop. Meanwhile, let the Donatist heretics quickly learn through the edicts of your Excellency that the laws passed against their error remain in force, which they think and boast are now of no effect, lest even so they be unable to spare us at all. But you will greatly help our labours and dangers to bear fruit if you take care that their most vain sect, full of ungodly pride, is not so repressed by the imperial laws that they seem to themselves or to their people to be enduring some troubles or other for truth and righteousness; but, when this is asked, allow them to be convicted and instructed by the most manifest documents of definite facts in the records of your Excellency or of the lesser judges, so that those who are detained by your order may, if possible, bend their hard will for the better and read these things to the others for their good. For it is a diligence more burdensome than useful merely to compel men, and not to teach them, even though it be to abandon a great evil and hold to a great good.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Rom 12:21. Translated exactly as written, including the request that the laws be enforced. “Cum hoc abs petitur” is defective in the digital text (probably “abs te”); translated as “when this is asked”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 100.2 (CSEL 34.2:537–539; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-100-2).

## Letter 101.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:539–540
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine apologizes to Bishop Memorius for not yet sending his corrected books, and introduces Possidius, trained on the Lord's bread rather than liberal letters.

### Latin text

Nullas debui iam reddere litteras sanctae caritati tuae sine his libris, quos a me sancti amoris iure uiolentissimo flagitasti, ut hac saltem oboedientia responderem epistulis tuis, quibus me magis onerare quam honorare dignatus es. quamquam ubi succumbo, quia oneror, ibi etiam, quia diligor, subleuor. neque enim a quolibet diligor, subleuor, eligor sed ab eo uiro et domini sacerdote, quem sic acceptum deo sentio, ut, cum animam tuam tam bonam leuas ad dominum, quoniam in illa me habes, leues et me. debui ergo nunc libros mittere, quos emendaturum me esse promiseram et ideo non misi, quia non emendaui, non quia nolui, sed quia non potui curis uidelicet multis et multum praeualentibus occupatus. nimis autem ingratum ac ferreum fuit, ut te, qui nos sic amas, hic sanctus frater et collega noster Possidius, in quo nostram non paruam praesentiam reperies, uel non disceret uel sine nostris litteris disceret. est enim per nostrum ministerium non litteris illis, quas uariarum serui libidinum liberales uocant, sed dominico pane nutritus, quantus ei potuit per nostras angustias dispensari.

### English translation (Claude)

I ought not to have sent any further letter to your holy Charity without those books which you demanded of me by the most forceful right of holy love, so that at least by this obedience I might answer your letters, with which you deigned rather to burden than to honour me. And yet where I sink because I am burdened, there too I am lifted because I am loved. For I am not loved, lifted, chosen by just anyone, but by such a man and priest of the Lord that I feel him to be so acceptable to God that, when you lift up your soul, so good, to the Lord, since you have me in it, you lift me too. I ought, then, to send now the books which I had promised to correct; and I have not sent them because I have not corrected them, not because I did not wish to, but because I could not, being occupied with many and very pressing cares. But it would have been too ungrateful and iron-hearted that this holy brother and colleague of ours, Possidius, in whom you will find no small presence of ours, should either not come to know you, who love us so much, or come to know you without a letter from us. For through our ministry he has been nourished, not on those letters which the slaves of various lusts call liberal, but on the Lord's bread, as much of it as could be dispensed to him through our narrow means.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Memorius, a bishop (father of Julian, later bishop of Eclanum). The books are Augustine's On Music (De musica).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 101.1 (CSEL 34.2:539–540; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-1).

## Letter 101.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:540–541
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Only what accords with truth is truly liberal; poets, orators and philosophers who did not know God are not, though honest history has some nearness to freedom.

### Latin text

Quid enim aliud dicendum est eis, qui cum sint iniqui et impii, liberaliter sibi uidentur eruditi, nisi quod in litteris uere liberalibus legimus: Si uos filius liberauerit, tunc uere liberi eritis? per eum namque praestatur, ut ipsae etiam, quae liberales disciplinae ab eis, qui in libertatem uocati non sunt, appellantur, quid in se habeant liberale, noscatur. neque enim habent congruum libertati, nisi quod habent congruum ueritati. unde ille ipse filius: Et ueritas, inquit, liberabit uos. non ergo illae innumerabiles et impiae fabulae, quibus uanorum plena sunt carmina poetarum, ullo modo nostrae consonant libertati, non oratorum inflata et expolita mendacia, non denique ipsorum philosophorum garrulae argutiae, qui uel deum prorsus non cognouerunt uel, cum cognouissent deum, non sicut deum glorificauerunt aut gratias egerunt, sed euanuerunt in cogitationibus suis et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum et dicentes se esse sapientes stulti facti sunt et inmutauerunt gloriam incorrupti dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis et uolucrum et quadrupedum et serpentium uel qui istis simulacris non dediti aut non nimis dediti coluerunt tamen et seruierunt creaturae potius quam creatori. absit omnino, ut istorum uanitates et insaniae mendaces, uentosae nugae ac superbus error recte liberales litterae nominentur hominum scilicet infelicium, qui dei gratiam per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, qua sola liberamur de corpore mortis huius, non cognouerunt nec in eis ipsis, quae uera senserunt. historia sane, cuius scriptores fidem se praecipue narrationibus suis debere. profitentur, fortassis habeat aliquid cognitione dignum liberis, cum siue bona siue mala hominum tamen uera narrantur. quamuis in eis cognoscendis, qui sancto spiritu non adiuti sunt rumoresque colligere ipsa humanae infirmitatis condicione compulsi sunt, quem ad modum non fallerentur in plurimis, omnino non uideo. est tamen aliqua in eis propinquitas libertatis, si uoluntatem mentiendi non habent nec homines fallunt, nisi cum ab hominibus humana infirmitate falluntur.

### English translation (Claude)

For what else should be said to those who, though unjust and ungodly, think themselves liberally educated, but what we read in letters truly liberal: “If the Son sets you free, then you will be free indeed”? For it is through him that it is granted that even those disciplines which are called liberal by those who have not been called to freedom may be known for what they have in them that is liberal. For they have nothing suited to freedom except what they have suited to truth. Hence that Son himself says: “And the truth will set you free.” So those countless and ungodly fables with which the songs of vain poets are filled in no way accord with our freedom, nor the inflated and polished lies of orators, nor finally the chattering subtleties of the philosophers themselves, who either did not know God at all, or, “though they knew God, did not glorify him as God or give thanks, but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened; claiming to be wise they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed beasts and serpents”; or, if they were not given, or not much given, to these images, nevertheless worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator. Far be it altogether that the vanities and lying madness, windy trifles and proud error of these men should rightly be called liberal letters, the men, that is, unhappy as they are, who did not know the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, by which alone we are freed from the body of this death, not even in those things that they perceived truly. History, indeed, whose writers profess that they owe good faith above all to their narratives, perhaps has something worthy of the knowledge of free men, since the deeds of men, good or bad, are at least truly narrated. Though how, in coming to know these things, those who were not helped by the Holy Spirit and were compelled by the very condition of human weakness to gather rumours could avoid being deceived in very many things, I do not at all see. Yet there is some nearness to freedom in them, if they have no will to lie and do not deceive men except when they are deceived by men through human weakness.

### Scripture references

- John 8:36: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:13: allusion, medium confidence
- John 8:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:25: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 8:36; John 8:32; Rom 1:21–23, 25. References: Gal 5:13; Rom 7:24–25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 101.2 (CSEL 34.2:540–541; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-2).

## Letter 101.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:541–542
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he wrote six books on rhythm in his leisure before ordination, as steps toward truth, and that five are hard to follow without a reader.

### Latin text

Verum quia in omnibus rerum motibus, quid numeri ualeant, facilius consideratur in uocibus eaque consideratio quibusdam quasi gradatis itineribus nititur ad superna intima ueritatis, in quibus uiis ostendit se sapientia hilariter et in omni prouidentia occurrit amantibus, initio nostri otii, cum a curis maioribus magisque necessariis uacabat animus, uolui per ista, quae a nobis desiderasti, scripta proludere, quando conscripsi de solo rhythmo sex libros et de melo scribere alios forsitan sex, fateor, disponebam, cum mihi otium futurum sperabam. sed postea quam mihi curarum ecclesiasticarum sarcina inposita est, omnes illae deliciae fugere de manibus, ita ut uix nunc ipsum codicem inueniam, quoniam tuam uoluntatem nec petitionem sed iussionem contemnere nequeo. quod sane opusculum si potuero mittere, non quidem me tibi obtemperasse uerum tamen te hoc a me tanto opere flagitasse paenitebit. difficillime quippe intelleguntur in eo quinque libri, si non adsit, qui non solum disputantium possit separare personas uerum etiam pronuntiando ita sonare morulas syllabarum, ut eis exprimantur sensumque aurium feriant genera numerorum, maxime quia in quibusdam etiam silentiorum dimensa interualla miscentur, quae omnino sentiri nequeunt, nisi auditorem pronuntiator informet.

### English translation (Claude)

But since, in all the motions of things, what numbers can do is more easily considered in sounds, and this consideration strives by certain graded paths toward the inmost heights of truth, in which ways wisdom shows herself cheerfully and meets those who love her in all providence, at the beginning of our leisure, when my mind was free from greater and more necessary cares, I wished to make a prelude with these writings which you have asked of us, when I wrote six books on rhythm alone; and I was planning, I confess, to write perhaps six more on melody, when I hoped I would have leisure. But after the burden of church cares was laid on me, all those delights fled from my hands, so that I can scarcely find the volume itself now, since I cannot disregard your wish, or rather not your request but your command. If I can send that little work, I shall not indeed regret having obeyed you, but you will regret having demanded it of me so urgently. For five of its books are very hard to understand unless someone is present who can not only distinguish the persons of those disputing but also, in pronouncing, so sound the lengths of the syllables that the kinds of rhythm are expressed by them and strike the sense of hearing; especially since in some places measured intervals of silence are also mixed in, which cannot be perceived at all unless the reader instructs the hearer.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 6:16 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The work is On Music (De musica), six books on rhythm; the planned books on melody were never written. “Wisdom shows herself cheerfully in the ways” quotes Wis 6:16 (outside the 66 books).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 101.3 (CSEL 34.2:541–542; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-3).

## Letter 101.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:542–544
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends the sixth book of On Music, expresses his longing to see the deacon Julian, and admits he does not know the metre of David's psalms.

### Latin text

Sextum sane librum, quem emendatum repperi, ubi est omnis fructus ceterorum, non distuli mittere caritati tuae; fortassis ipse tuam non multum refugiat grauitatem. nam superiores quinque uix filio nostro et condiacono Iuliano, quoniam et ipse iam nobiscum commilitat, digni lectione uel cognitione uidebuntur. quem quidem non audeo dicere plus amo quam te, quia nec ueraciter dico, sed tamen audeo dicere plus desidero quam te. mirum uideri potest, quem ad modum, quem pariter amo, amplius desiderem; sed hoc mihi facit spes amplior uidendi eum; puto enim, quod, si ad nos te iubente uel mittente uenerit, et hoc faciet, quod adulescentem decet, maxime quia nondum curis maioribus detinetur, et te ipsum mihi expeditius adportabit. quibus numeris consistant uersus Dauidici, non scripsi, quia nescio. neque enim ex Hebraea lingua, quam ignoro, potuit etiam numeros interpres exprimere, ne metri necessitate ab interpretandi ueritate amplius, quam ratio sententiarum sinebat, digredi cogeretur. certis tamen eos constare numeris credo illis, qui eam linguam probe callent. amauit enim uir ille sanctus musicam piam et in ea studia nos magis ipse quam ullus alius auctor accendit. habitetis omnes in aeternum in adiutorio altissimi, qui habitatis unanimes in domo, pater materque fratres filiorum et cuncti unius patris filii memores nostri.

### English translation (Claude)

The sixth book, however, which I found corrected, and in which is all the fruit of the others, I did not delay sending to your Charity; perhaps it will not be altogether unsuited to your gravity. For the first five will seem scarcely worthy of being read or known by our son and fellow deacon Julian, since he too is now a fellow soldier with us. I do not dare say that I love him more than you, for I would not say it truly; but I do dare say that I long for him more than for you. It may seem strange how I can long more for one whom I love equally; but a greater hope of seeing him does this to me. For I think that if he comes to us at your bidding or sending, he will do what befits a young man, especially since he is not yet held back by greater cares, and he will bring you yourself to me more readily. In what rhythms the verses of David consist I have not written, because I do not know. For the translator from the Hebrew language, which I do not know, could not express the rhythms as well, lest by the necessity of metre he be forced to depart further from the truth of translation than the sense of the sentences allowed. Yet I believe that they consist of definite rhythms, as those who know that language well say. For that holy man loved sacred music, and he more than any other author has kindled us to these studies. May you all dwell for ever in the help of the Most High, you who dwell of one mind in one house, father and mother, brothers of your sons, and all sons of one Father; remember us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 91:1 (90:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 68:6 (67:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Julian, son of Memorius, later bishop of Eclanum and Augustine's chief Pelagian opponent. References: Ps 91:1 (90:1 LXX); Ps 68:6 (67:7 LXX, “who makes those of one mind dwell in a house”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 101.4 (CSEL 34.2:542–544; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/98-1/#p-101-4).

## Letter 102.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:544–545
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends the presbyter Deogratias his answers to six questions put by a pagan friend, and asks him to answer the friend briefly himself.

### Latin text

Quaestiones tibi propositas mihi delegare maluisti non, ut opinor, pigritia, sed quod ea quoque ipsa, quae nosti, libentius per nos audis, dum nos nimis diligis. at ego propterea malebam a te illas aperiri, quod ille ipse amicus, qui eas proposuit, quantum ex hoc conici datur, quod mihi ad quasdam epistulas non rescripsit, quasi nos uerecundatur sequi; uiderit quam ob causam. hoc tamen suspicor nec suspicio mea uel maliuola est uel absurda, cum et optime noueris, quantum eum diligam quantoque mihi dolori sit, quod nondum Christianus est, et utique non inconuenienter arbitror eum, quem uideo mihi rescribere noluisse, nihil sibi a me scribi uoluisse. proinde obsecro te, ut, quem ad modum ego tibi parui atque inter meas artissimas occupationes tuam sanctam mihique carissimam uoluntatem offendere timui, ut facerem, quod petisti, ita tu quoque facias, quod peto. hoc est autem, ut breuiter, quem ad modum a te, sicut mihi indicasti, postulauit, ad omnia illi respondere non graueris, quod et ante facere potuisti. scies enim, cum legeris, nihil paene a me dictum, quod ipse non noueras aut quod me tacente nosse non poteras. sed hoc opus meum habeas rogo cum ceteris, quorum studio scis conuenire. tuum uero illud, quod flagito, habeat ipse, cui hoc potissimum congruit, et ceteri, quos non parum ista delectant, quem ad modum abs te dici possunt, inter quos et ipse sum. uiuas semper in Christo nostri memor. SEX QVAESTIONES CONTRA PAGANOS EXPOSITAE.

### English translation (Claude)

You preferred to delegate to me the questions put to you, not, I think, from laziness, but because you hear even the things you know more gladly through us, since you love us too much. But I preferred that they be explained by you, because that friend himself who put them, as far as one may guess from the fact that he did not reply to some letters of mine, is as it were ashamed to follow us; let him see for what reason. This, however, I suspect, and my suspicion is neither malicious nor absurd, since you know very well how much I love him and how much it grieves me that he is not yet a Christian; and I think it not unfitting to suppose that one whom I see did not wish to write back to me did not wish anything to be written to him by me. So I beg you, just as I obeyed you and, amid my most pressing occupations, was afraid of offending your holy will, so dear to me, and did what you asked, so you too do what I ask: namely, that you do not mind answering him briefly on all points, as he asked of you, as you told me, which you could have done even before. For when you read this, you will know that almost nothing has been said by me which you did not know yourself or could not have known without my speaking. But I ask you to keep this work of mine with the others whose study you know it suits. But let that work of yours which I demand be had by him to whom it is above all suited, and by the others who take no small delight in these things, as they can be said by you; and I am one of them. May you live always in Christ, remembering us. Six questions against the pagans, explained.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to the Carthaginian presbyter Deogratias (NPNF heading, ca. 409); the treatise is also known as Six Questions against the Pagans. The final line is the edition's heading for what follows.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.1 (CSEL 34.2:544–545; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-1).

## Letter 102.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:545–546
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The first pagan question asks whether the promised resurrection resembles Christ's or Lazarus's, and why the risen Christ ate and showed wounds.

### Latin text

I. DE RESURRECTIONE. Mouet quosdam et requirunt de duabus resurrectionibus quae conueniat promissae resurrectioni, utrumnam Christi an Lazari. si Christi, inquiunt, quo modo potest haec conuenire resurrectioni natorum ex semine eius, qui nulla seminis condicione natus est? si autem Lazari resurrectio conuenire adseritur, ne haec quidem congruere uidetur, si quidem Lazari resurrectio facta sit de corpore nondum tabescente, de eo corpore, quo Lazarus dicebatur; nostra autem multis saeculis post ex confuso eruetur. deinde si post resurrectionem status beatus futurus est nulla corporis iniuria, nulla necessitate famis, quid sibi uult cibatum fuisse Christum et uulnera monstrauisse? sed si propter incredulum fecit, finxit; si autem uerum ostendit, ergo in resurrectione accepta futura sunt uulnera.

### English translation (Claude)

I. On the resurrection. Some people are troubled and ask which of the two resurrections agrees with the promised resurrection, Christ's or Lazarus's. “If Christ's,” they say, “how can it agree with the resurrection of those born of seed, when he was born under no condition of seed? But if it is asserted that Lazarus's resurrection agrees, not even this seems to fit, since Lazarus's resurrection was from a body not yet decomposing, from that body by which he was called Lazarus; whereas ours will be dug out of a confused mass many ages later. Then, if after the resurrection there is to be a blessed state with no injury to the body and no necessity of hunger, what is meant by Christ's having eaten and shown his wounds? If he did it for the sake of the unbeliever, he pretended; but if he showed something real, then the wounds received will be there in the resurrection.”

### Scripture references

- John 11:44: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:43: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: John 11:39–44; Luke 24:39–43; John 20:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.2 (CSEL 34.2:545–546; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-2).

## Letter 102.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:546–547
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's resurrection, not Lazarus's, is the pattern, since he dies no more; a different birth makes no difference to death or resurrection.

### Latin text

Quibus respondetur ideo non Lazari resurrectionem sed potius Christi congruere promissae resurrectioni, quia Lazarus ita resurrexit, ut iterum moreretur, Christus autem, sicut de illo scriptum est, surgens a mortuis iam non moritur et mors ei ultra non dominabitur. quod etiam promissum est resurrecturis in fine saeculi et cum illo regnaturis in aeternum. sic autem non pertinet ad resurrectionem differentia natiuitatis Christi et nostrae, quod ille sine uirili semine nos autem ex uiro et femina creati sumus, sicut non pertinet ad ipsius mortis differentiam. non enim propterea illius non uera mors fuit, quia sine uirili semine natus est, sicut nec ipsius primi hominis aliter exorta caro quam nostra, quando quidem ille sine parentibus de terra creatus est nos uero ex parentibus, aliquid adtulit ad differentiam mortis, ut aliter ille moreretur aliter nos. sicut autem ad mortis sic nec ad resurrectionis differentiam ualet diuersa natiuitas.

### English translation (Claude)

To these we answer that it is not Lazarus's resurrection but rather Christ's that agrees with the promised resurrection, because Lazarus rose so as to die again, but Christ, as is written of him, “rising from the dead dies no more, and death will no longer have dominion over him.” This is promised too to those who will rise at the end of the world and reign with him for ever. The difference between Christ's birth and ours, that he was born without male seed and we were created from man and woman, no more concerns the resurrection than it concerns the difference of death itself. For his death was not the less real because he was born without male seed; just as the different origin of the first man's flesh from ours (since he was created from the earth without parents, and we from parents) contributed nothing to a difference of death, as though he died one way and we another. As, then, a different birth makes no difference to death, so it makes none to resurrection.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Rom 6:9. Reference: Gen 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.3 (CSEL 34.2:546–547; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-3).

## Letter 102.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:547–548
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Animals born from the earth and from parents live and die alike, so bodies of different origin can rise alike.

### Latin text

Sed ne hoc ipsum, quod scriptum est de primo homine, similiter infideles nolint credere, quaerant uel animaduertant, si uel hoc possunt, quam multorum animalium genera sine parentibus ex terra procreentur, quae tamen coeundo pariant etiam ipsa sui similem prolem nec propter diuersitatem natiuitatis intersit aliquid ad naturam eorum, quae procreata sunt ex terra, et eorum, quae illis coeuntibus orta sunt. similiter enim uiuunt similiterque moriuntur, quamuis dissimiliter nata sint. ita non est absurdum, ut similiter resurgant corpora, quae dissimiliter orta sunt. huius modi autem homines non ualentes intueri, ad quam rem intersit aliquid diuersum et ad quam non intersit, ubi aduerterint aliquam distantiam primordiorum, etiam omnia consequentia distare oportere contendunt. possunt tales putare oleum ex adipibus non debere natare super aquam sicut illud, quod ex oliua est, quoniam longe est utriusque origo dissimilis, quando illud ex ligno hoc ex carne profluxerit.

### English translation (Claude)

But lest unbelievers likewise refuse to believe this very thing that is written of the first man, let them inquire or notice, if they can at least do this, how many kinds of animals are produced from the earth without parents, which nevertheless themselves bear offspring like themselves by mating; and because of the difference of birth there is no difference in the nature of those produced from the earth and those born of their mating. For they live alike and die alike, though they were born unlike. So it is not absurd that bodies which originated unlike should rise alike. But men of this kind, unable to see to what a difference matters and to what it does not, as soon as they notice some distance in origins, contend that all that follows must differ too. Such men may think that oil from fat ought not to float on water as that which is from the olive does, since the origin of each is very different, the one having flowed from wood, the other from flesh.

### Translation notes

- The spontaneous generation of animals from earth is the natural science of Augustine's time, reported as he gives it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.4 (CSEL 34.2:547–548; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-4).

## Letter 102.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:548–549
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Raising long-dissolved bodies is as easy to God as raising Christ's on the third day; nature, like the seed holding the tree, is full of greater wonders.

### Latin text

Quantum autem adtinet ad illam differentiam, quod Christi corpus non dissolutum tabe atque putredine die tertio resurrexit, nostra uero post longum tempus ex quadam, quo soluta discesserint, confusione reparabuntur, humanae facultati utrumque inpossibile est, diuinae autem potestati utrumque facillimum. ut enim radius oculi nostri non citius peruenit ad propinquiora tardius ad longinquiora, sed utraque interualla parili celeritate contingit, ita cum in ictu oculi, sicut apostolus dicit, fit resurrectio mortuorum, omnipotentiae dei et ineffabili nutui tam facile est quaeque recentia quam diuturno tempore dilapsa cadauera suscitare. incredibilia sunt haec quibusdam, quia inexperta, cum omnis natura rerum tam sit plena miraculis, ut non quasi facili peruestigatione rationis sed uidendi consuetudine mira non sint atque ob hoc nec consideratione nec inquisitione digna uideantur. nam ego et mecum quicumque inuisibilia dei per ea, quae facta sunt, intellegere moliuntur, aut non minus aut amplius admiramur in uno seminis tam paruulo grano omnia, quae laudamus in arbore, tamquam liciata latuisse, quam mundi huius tam ingentem sinum, quae de corporibus humanis, dum dilabuntur, absumit, resurrectioni futurae tota et integra redditurum.

### English translation (Claude)

As for that difference, that Christ's body rose on the third day not dissolved by decay and putrefaction, whereas ours will be restored after a long time from a kind of confusion into which they will have passed when dissolved: both are impossible to human ability, both are very easy to divine power. For just as the ray of our eye does not reach nearer things more quickly and farther things more slowly, but touches both distances with equal speed, so, when the resurrection of the dead takes place in the twinkling of an eye, as the apostle says, it is as easy for the omnipotence of God and his unspeakable will to raise corpses recently dead as those long since decayed. These things are incredible to some because they have not experienced them, though the whole nature of things is so full of miracles that they are not wonderful, not because reason has easily traced them out, but by the habit of seeing them, and for that reason they do not seem worth consideration or inquiry. For I, and with me whoever strives to understand the invisible things of God through the things that are made, marvel no less, or even more, that in one so small grain of seed all that we praise in the tree lay hidden as if folded up, than that the vast bosom of this world will return whole and entire for the future resurrection what it takes from human bodies as they decay.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:52: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: 1 Cor 15:52; Rom 1:20. The theory that sight works by a ray from the eye is ancient optics, reported as given.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.5 (CSEL 34.2:548–549; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-5).

## Letter 102.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:549–550
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The risen body, like angels who ate with Abraham, will be able to eat by power without needing to.

### Latin text

Quo modo autem contrarium est et Christum post resurrectionem cibatum et in resurrectione, quae promittitur, ciborum indigentiam non futuram, cum et angelos legamus eiusdem modi escas eodemque modo sumpsisse non ficto phantasmate sed manifestissima ueritate nec tamen necessitate sed potestate? aliter enim absorbet aquam terra sitiens aliter solis radius candens, illa indigentia iste potentia. futurae ergo resurrectionis corpus inperfectae felicitatis erit, si cibos sumere non potuerit, inperfectae felicitatis, si cibis eguerit. possem hic de commutationibus corporalium qualitatum et de praepotenti ualentia in inferiora corpora corporum superiorum latius disputare; sed breuiter mihi respondere propositum est et talibus ingeniis hoc scribitur, quae admonere suffecerit.

### English translation (Claude)

And how is it contradictory both that Christ ate after the resurrection and that in the promised resurrection there will be no need of food, when we read that angels too took food of the same kind and in the same way, not by a feigned phantom but in most manifest truth, yet not by necessity but by power? For the thirsty earth absorbs water in one way, the burning ray of the sun in another: the one from need, the other from power. So the body of the future resurrection will be of imperfect happiness if it cannot take food, and of imperfect happiness if it needs food. I could discuss at more length here the changes of bodily qualities and the superior power of higher bodies over lower ones; but my purpose is to answer briefly, and this is written for minds of such a kind that a reminder will suffice.

### Scripture references

- Gen 18:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Gen 18:8 (angels eating with Abraham).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.6 (CSEL 34.2:549–550; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-6).

## Letter 102.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:550–551
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ showed real scars, not wounds, to prove the same body had risen, as a soldier might keep scars as badges of honour.

### Latin text

Sciat sane, qui has proposuit quaestiones, Christum post resurrectionem cicatrices, non uulnera demonstrasse dubitantibus, propter quos etiam cibum ac potum sumere uoluit non semel sed saepius, ne illud non corpus sed spiritum esse arbitrarentur et sibi non solide sed imaginaliter apparere. tunc autem illae falsae cicatrices fuissent, si nulla uulnera praecessissent; et tamen nec ipsae essent, si eas esse noluisset. uoluit autem certae dispensationis gratia, ut eis, quos aedificabat in fide non ficta, non aliud pro alio sed hoc, quod crucifixum uiderant, resurrexisse monstraret. quid est ergo, quod dicitur: Si propter incredulum fecit, finxit? quasi uero, si quisquam uir fortis pro patria dimicans multa aduersa uulnera exciperet et peritissimo medico, qui haec curare ita ualeret, ut cicatrices nullae apparerent, ipse potius diceret sic se uelle sanari, ut magis essent in corpore suo uestigia uulnerum tamquam tituli gloriarum, ideo ille medicus cicatrices finxisse diceretur, quia, cum per artem efficere potuerit, ut non essent, certa existente causa per artem effecit potius, ut essent. quae uno solo modo, sicut superius dixi, falsae conuincerentur, si nulla uulnera sanarentur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let him who put these questions know that after the resurrection Christ showed scars, not wounds, to those who doubted, for whose sake he also chose to take food and drink, not once but more often, lest they think it was not a body but a spirit, and that he appeared to them not solidly but as an image. Those scars would have been false if no wounds had preceded them; and yet they would not have existed at all if he had not willed them to exist. But he willed it for the sake of a certain dispensation, so as to show to those he was building up in an unfeigned faith that not one thing instead of another, but the very thing they had seen crucified, had risen. What then is the meaning of saying, “If he did it for the sake of the unbeliever, he pretended”? As if, supposing some brave man fighting for his country received many wounds in front, and when a most skilful physician could heal them so that no scars would appear, he himself said he would rather be healed so that traces of the wounds remained in his body as titles of glory, that physician would therefore be said to have feigned scars, because, though he could by his art have made them not exist, for a definite reason he made them exist instead. These scars, as I said above, could be proved false in only one way: if no wounds had been healed.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:39: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:27: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 10:41: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Luke 24:37–43; John 20:27; Acts 10:41.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.7 (CSEL 34.2:550–551; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-7).

## Letter 102.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:551–552
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The second question, taken from Porphyry, asks what became of all the souls who lived before Christ came.

### Latin text

II. DE TEMPORE CHRISTIANAE RELIGIONIS. Item alia proposuerunt, quae dicerent de Porphyrio contra Christianos tamquam ualidiora decerpta: Si Christus, inquiunt, salutis se uiam dicit, gratiam et ueritatem in seque solo ponit animis sibi credentibus reditum, quid egerunt tot saeculorum homines ante Christum? ut dimittam, inquit, tempora ante Latium regnatum, ab ipso Latio quasi principium humani nominis sumamus. in ipso Latio ante Albam dii culti sunt. in Alba aeque religiones ritusque ualuere templorum. non paucioribus saeculis ipsa Roma longo saeculorum tractu sine Christiana lege fuit. quid, inquit, actum de tam innumeris animis, quae omnino in culpa nulla sunt, si quidem is, cui credi posset, nondum aduentum suum hominibus commodarat? orbis quoque cum ipsa Roma in ritibus templorum caluit. quare, inquit, saluator qui dictus est, sese tot saeculis subduxit? sed ne dicant, inquit, lege Iudaica uetere hominum curatum genus, longo post tempore lex Iudaeorum apparuit ac uiguit angusta Syriae regione, postea uero prorepsit etiam in fines Italos sed post Caesarem Gaium aut certe ipso imperante. quid igitur actum de Romanis animis uel Latinis, quae gratia nondum aduenientis Christi uiduatae sunt usque in Caesarum tempus?

### English translation (Claude)

II. On the time of the Christian religion. They also put forward other things, which they said were extracted from Porphyry against the Christians, as stronger arguments: “If Christ,” they say, “declares himself the way of salvation, grace and truth, and places in himself alone the return for souls that believe in him, what did the people of so many ages before Christ do? To pass over,” he says, “the times before Latium was ruled, let us take Latium itself as the beginning, as it were, of human civilization. In Latium itself, before Alba, gods were worshipped. In Alba, too, religions and the rites of temples prevailed. For no fewer ages Rome itself, through a long stretch of ages, was without the Christian law. What,” he says, “has become of such innumerable souls, which are in no way to blame, if he in whom one could believe had not yet granted his coming to men? The world too, together with Rome itself, glowed with the rites of temples. Why,” he says, “did he who is called Saviour withdraw himself for so many ages? But lest they say,” he says, “that the human race was cared for by the old Jewish law, the law of the Jews appeared long after and flourished in a narrow region of Syria, and afterwards crept even into the borders of Italy, but after Gaius Caesar or at the earliest while he was ruling. What then has become of the Roman or Latin souls, which were deprived of the grace of the not yet coming Christ up to the time of the Caesars?”

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Porphyry, Porphyry, Chr. 81 (Porphyry, Against the Christians (fragments)): quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation from Porphyry, Against the Christians (fr. 81 Harnack), as reported to Augustine. Allusion: John 14:6; John 1:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.8 (CSEL 34.2:551–552; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-8).

## Letter 102.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:552
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The same objection applies to pagan rites, which were instituted at definite times and so were unavailable to those who died before them.

### Latin text

Huic propositioni respondetur, ut primo ipsi dicant, utrum profuerint hominibus deorum suorum sacra, quae constat certis temporibus instituta. quae si negant aliquid profuisse ad animarum salutem, nobiscum ea destruunt et esse inania confitentur. nos quidem etiam perniciosa monstramus; sed parum non est, ut ipsi interim prius inania fateantur. si uero ea defendunt et sapienter atque utiliter adserunt instituta, quaero, quid actum sit de his, qui ante, quam haec instituta essent, morte obierunt; hac enim utique salute atque utilitate fraudati sunt. si autem potuerunt alio modo purgari, cur non idem modus perseuerauit in posteros? quid opus erat instituere nouitias consecrationes, quae antiquitus non fuerunt?

### English translation (Claude)

To this proposition the answer is that they should first say themselves whether the rites of their gods, which were clearly instituted at definite times, profited men. If they deny that these profited anything for the salvation of souls, they destroy them along with us and confess that they are empty. We indeed show that they are even harmful; but it is no small thing that they should first confess them empty for the time being. But if they defend them and assert that they were wisely and usefully instituted, I ask what has become of those who died before these were instituted; for they were certainly cheated of this salvation and benefit. And if they could be purified in another way, why did the same way not continue for their descendants? What need was there to institute new consecrations which did not exist in ancient times?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.9 (CSEL 34.2:552; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-9).

## Letter 102.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:552–553
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pagans who say their gods were served differently in different times must allow the same for the one true religion, whose rites follow God's will.

### Latin text

Hic si dicunt deos quidem ipsos semper fuisse et ad liberandos cultores suos pariter ubique ualuisse, sed pro uarietate rerum temporalium ac terrenarum, quae scirent certis temporibus locisque congruere, in his alias atque alias alibi atque alibi aliter atque aliter sibi uoluisse seruiri, cur hanc quaestionem ingerunt religioni Christianae, in qua nobis ipsi pro diis suis aut respondere non possunt aut, si possunt, in eo ipso sibi etiam pro nostra religione respondeant ita nihil interesse pro diuersa temporum locorumque congruentia, quam diuersis sacramentis colatur, si, quod colitur, sanctum est, sicut nihil interest pro diuersa linguarum auditorumque congruentia, quam diuersis sonis dicatur, si quod dicitur, uerum est, dum hoc sane intersit, quod linguae sonos, quibus inter se sua sensa communicent, etiam homines pacto quodam societatis instituere sibi possunt, quibus autem sacris diuinitati congruerent, uoluntatem dei secuti sunt, qui recte sapuerunt. quae omnino numquam defuit ad salutem iustitiae pietatique mortalium et, si qua in aliis atque aliis populis una eademque religione sociatis uarie celebrantur, quatenus fiat, plurimum refert, quo et humana exhortetur uel toleretur infirmitas et diuina non oppugnetur auctoritas.

### English translation (Claude)

If here they say that the gods themselves always existed and were everywhere equally able to free their worshippers, but, according to the variety of temporal and earthly things, which they knew to suit definite times and places, they wished to be served in different ways, in different places, in different manners, why do they press this question on the Christian religion, when either they cannot answer it for their own gods, or, if they can, in that very answer they should answer for our religion too: that it makes no difference, according to the different suitability of times and places, by what different sacraments one worships, if what is worshipped is holy; just as it makes no difference, according to the different suitability of languages and hearers, by what different sounds something is said, if what is said is true. With this difference, indeed: that men can institute for themselves the sounds of language, by which to communicate their thoughts to one another, by a kind of social agreement; but those who were rightly wise have followed the will of God as to what rites would befit the Godhead. That will has never been lacking for the salvation of the righteousness and piety of mortals; and if certain things are celebrated differently among various peoples joined in one and the same religion, it matters greatly how far this is done, so that human weakness may be encouraged or tolerated and divine authority not opposed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.10 (CSEL 34.2:552–553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-10).

## Letter 102.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:553–554
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ, the unchangeable Word through whom all things were made, has governed all ages by suitable means, before and after his incarnation.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem cum Christum dicamus uerbum dei, per quod facta sunt omnia, et ideo filium, quia uerbum, nec uerbum dictum atque transactum sed apud incommutabilem patrem incommutabile ipsum atque incommutabiliter manens, sub cuius regimine uniuersa creatura spiritalis et corporalis pro congruentia temporum locorumque administratur, cuius moderandae et gubernandae quid quando et ubi circa eam fieri oporteat, sapientia et scientia penes ipsum est profecto - et ante, quam propagaret Hebraeorum gentem, per quam sui aduentus manifestationem congruis sacramentis praefiguraret, et ipsis temporibus Israhelitici regni et deinde, cum se in carne de uirgine accepta mortalibus mortaliter demonstrauit, et deinceps usque nunc, cum implet omnia, quae per prophetas ante praedixit, et abhinc usque in finem saeculi, quo sanctos ab impiis dirempturus est et sua cuique retributurus, idem ipse est filius dei patri coaeternus et incommutabilis sapientia, per quam creata est uniuersa natura et cuius participatione omnis rationalis anima fit beata.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, since we say that Christ is the Word of God, through whom all things were made, and is therefore Son because he is Word; not a word spoken and passed away, but abiding with the unchangeable Father, himself unchangeable and unchangeably; under whose rule the whole creation, spiritual and corporeal, is administered according to the suitability of times and places; with whom, surely, rests the wisdom and knowledge of what should be done concerning it, and when and where, in directing and governing it: both before he propagated the nation of the Hebrews, through which he would prefigure by suitable sacraments the manifestation of his coming, and in the very times of the kingdom of Israel, and afterwards when he showed himself mortal to mortals in the flesh taken from a virgin, and from then until now, when he fulfils all that he foretold through the prophets, and from now until the end of the world, when he will separate the saints from the ungodly and render to each his own, he is the same Son of God, coeternal with the Father, and the unchangeable Wisdom through whom all nature was created and by participation in whom every rational soul is made blessed.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:3: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 25:32: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 16:27: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: John 1:1–3; Col 2:3; Matt 25:32; Matt 16:27. The Christological statements are translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.11 (CSEL 34.2:553–554; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-11).

## Letter 102.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:554–555
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: All who believed in Christ and lived piously from the beginning of the human race were saved through him; one true religion has existed under different signs.

### Latin text

Itaque ab exordio generis humani quicumque in eum crediderunt eumque utcumque intellexerunt et secundum eius praecepta pie iusteque uixerunt, quando libet et ubi libet fuerint, per eum procul dubio salui facti sunt. sicut enim nos in eum credimus et apud patrem manentem et qui in carne iam uenerit, sic in eum credebant antiqui et apud patrem manentem et in carne uenturum. nec, quia pro temporum uarietate nunc factum adnuntiatur, quod tunc futurum praenuntiabatur, ideo fides ipsa uariata uel salus ipsa diuersa est nec, quia una eademque res aliis atque aliis sacris et sacramentis uel prophetatur uel praedicatur, ideo alias et alias res uel alias et alias salutes oportet intellegi. quid autem quando fiat, quod ad unam eandemque fidelium et piorum liberationem pertineat, consilium deo tribuamus, nobis oboedientiam teneamus. proinde aliis tunc nominibus et signis aliis autem nunc et prius occultius postea manifestius et prius a paucioribus post a pluribus una tamen eademque uera religio significatur et obseruatur.

### English translation (Claude)

And so, from the beginning of the human race, whoever believed in him and understood him in whatever way, and lived piously and righteously according to his precepts, whenever and wherever they were, were without doubt saved through him. For as we believe in him both as abiding with the Father and as having already come in the flesh, so the ancients believed in him both as abiding with the Father and as going to come in the flesh. Nor, because according to the variety of times what was then foretold as future is now announced as done, is faith itself therefore varied or salvation itself different; nor, because one and the same thing is prophesied or preached by different rites and sacraments, must different things or different salvations be understood. What is done, and when, that pertains to the one and same deliverance of the faithful and godly, let us attribute to God's counsel, and let us keep obedience for ourselves. So by other names and signs then, and by others now, earlier more hiddenly and later more openly, earlier by fewer and later by more, one and the same true religion is signified and observed.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's claim that the righteous before Christ were saved through faith in him is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.12 (CSEL 34.2:554–555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-12).

## Letter 102.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:555
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christians do not fault paganism for changing its rites over time, but for worshipping false gods; what suits each time is set by providence.

### Latin text

Nec nos eis obicimus, quod aliter Numa Pompilius deos colendos Romanis instituit, atque ab eis uel Italis antea colebantur, nec quod Pythagoreis temporibus illa philosophia celebrata est, quae antea uel omnino non erat uel in paucissimis eadem sentientibus non tamen eodem ritu uiuentibus fortasse latitabat, sed utrum illi dii ueri aut colendi sint et utrum illa philosophia saluti animarum aliquid prosit; hoc cum eis agimus, hoc in quaestionem uocamus, hoc disputando conuellimus. desinant igitur obicere nobis, quod omni sectae et omni nomini religionis obici potest. cum enim non fortuito labi sed diuina prouidentia tempora ordinari fateantur, quid cuique tempori aptum et opportunum sit, humanum consilium praetergreditur et illinc dispertitur, unde ipsa prouidentia rebus consulit.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor do we object to them that Numa Pompilius instituted for the Romans a worship of the gods different from that with which they or the Italians had worshipped them before, nor that in the time of Pythagoras that philosophy became celebrated which either did not exist at all before or perhaps lay hidden among very few who held the same opinions but did not live by the same rule; but whether those gods are true or to be worshipped, and whether that philosophy profits the salvation of souls at all: this we argue with them, this we call into question, this we overthrow by argument. Let them stop, then, objecting to us what can be objected to every sect and every name of religion. For since they admit that the times are ordered not by chance but by divine providence, what is fitting and opportune for each time surpasses human counsel and is distributed from the source whence providence itself takes care of things.

### Translation notes

- Numa Pompilius, legendary second king of Rome, credited with founding Roman religious institutions.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.13 (CSEL 34.2:555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-13).

## Letter 102.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:555–557
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ appeared when and where he foreknew there would be believers; in earlier ages he foresaw that people would not have believed even his miracles.

### Latin text

Si enim dixerint propterea non semper nec ubique fuisse Pythagoricam disciplinam, quia Pythagoras homo fuit neque hoc in potestate habere potuit, numquid etiam hoc possunt dicere eo ipso tempore, quando fuit, et terrarum locis, ubi illa philosophia uiguit, omnes, qui eum potuerunt audire, etiam credere sectarique uoluisse? ac per hoc magis, si tantae potestatis fuisset Pythagoras, ut, ubi uellet et quando uellet, sua dogmata praedicaret, et si haberet etiam cum ea potestate summam rerum praescientiam, nusquam et numquam appareret, nisi ubi et quando sibi homines credituros esse praenosceret. proinde, cum Christo non obiciant, quod eius doctrinam non omnes sequuntur, sentiunt enim et ipsi nequaquam hoc recte obici posse uel sapientiae philosophorum uel etiam numini deorum suorum, quid respondebunt, si excepta illa altitudine sapientiae et scientiae dei, ubi fortassis aliud diuinum consilium longe secretius latet, sine praeiudicio etiam aliarum forte causarum, quae a prudentibus inuestigari queunt, hoc solum eis breuitatis gratia in huius quaestionis disputatione dicamus tunc uoluisse hominibus apparere Christum et apud eos praedicari doctrinam suam, quando sciebat et ubi sciebat esse, qui in eum fuerant credituri? his enim temporibus et his locis, quibus euangelium eius non est praedicatum, tales omnes in eius praedicatione futuros esse praesciebat, quales non quidem omnes sed tamen multi in eius corporali praesentia fuerunt, qui in eum nec suscitatis ab eo mortuis credere uoluerunt, quales etiam nunc multos uidemus, cum tanta manifestatione de illo compleantur praeconia prophetarum, nolle adhuc credere et malle humana astutia resistere quam tam clarae atque perspicuae tamque sublimi et sublimiter diffamatae diuinae cedere auctoritati, quam diu paruus et infirmus est intellectus hominis diuinae cedere ueritati. quid ergo mirum, si tam infidelibus plenum orbem terrarum Christus prioribus saeculis nouerat, ut eis apparere uel praedicari merito nollet, quos nec uerbis nec miraculis suis credituros esse praesciebat? neque enim incredibile est tales fuisse tunc omnes, quales ab eius aduentu usque ad hoc tempus tam multos fuisse atque esse miramur.

### English translation (Claude)

For if they say that the Pythagorean teaching did not exist always and everywhere because Pythagoras was a man and could not have this in his power, can they also say that at the very time when he lived, and in the regions where that philosophy flourished, all who could hear him also wished to believe and follow him? And so, all the more, if Pythagoras had been of such power as to preach his doctrines where and when he wished, and if, with that power, he also had supreme foreknowledge of things, he would appear nowhere and never except where and when he foreknew that men would believe him. Therefore, since they do not object to Christ that not all follow his teaching (for they themselves feel that this can by no means rightly be objected either to the wisdom of the philosophers or even to the divinity of their own gods), what will they answer if, setting aside that depth of the wisdom and knowledge of God, where perhaps some other divine counsel lies far more hidden, and without prejudice to other causes too, perhaps, that the wise may investigate, we say to them only this, for brevity's sake, in discussing this question: that Christ willed to appear to men and his teaching to be preached among them when he knew, and where he knew, there were those who would believe in him? For in those times and places in which his Gospel was not preached, he foreknew that all would be such in regard to its preaching as, not indeed all, but many were in his bodily presence, who would not believe in him even when he raised the dead; such as we see many even now, when the proclamations of the prophets about him are fulfilled so manifestly, still unwilling to believe and preferring to resist by human cunning rather than yield to divine authority so clear and evident, so sublime and so sublimely spread abroad, as long as man's understanding is small and weak to yield to divine truth. What wonder then, if Christ knew that in earlier ages the world was so full of unbelievers that he rightly did not wish to appear or be preached to those who, he foreknew, would believe neither his words nor his miracles? For it is not incredible that all were then such as we marvel that so many have been and are from his coming until this time.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- John 12:37: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Rom 11:33; John 12:37. Augustine's argument from foreknowledge is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.14 (CSEL 34.2:555–557; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-14).

## Letter 102.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:557–558
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Believers in Christ existed in every age and even outside Israel; the true religion was never lacking to anyone worthy of it.

### Latin text

Et tamen ab initio generis humani alias occultius alias euidentius, sicut congruere temporibus diuinitus uisum est, nec prophetari destitit nec, qui in eum crederent, defuerunt ab Adam usque ad Moysen et in ipso populo Israhel, quae speciali quodam mysterio gens prophetica fuit, et in aliis gentibus, antequam uenisset in carne. cum enim nonnulli commemorantur in sanctis Hebraicis libris iam ex tempore Abrahae nec de stirpe carnis eius nec ex populo Israhel nec aduenticia societate in populo Israhel, qui tamen huius sacramenti participes fuerunt, cur non credamus etiam in ceteris hac atque illac gentibus alias alios fuisse, quamuis eos commemoratos in eisdem auctoritatibus non legamus? ita salus religionis huius, per quam solam ueram salus uera ueraciterque promittitur, nulli umquam defuit, qui dignus fuit, et, cui defuit, dignus non fuit. et ab exordio propagationis humanae usque in finem quibusdam ad praemium quibusdam ad iudicium praedicatur. ac per hoc et, quibus omnino adnuntiata non est, non credituri praesciebantur et, quibus non credituris tamen adnuntiata est, in illorum exemplo demonstrantur; quibus autem credituris adnuntiatur, hi regno caelorum et sanctorum angelorum societati praeparantur.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet from the beginning of the human race, sometimes more hiddenly, sometimes more evidently, as it seemed good to God to suit the times, he never ceased to be prophesied, nor were those lacking who believed in him, from Adam to Moses, and in the people of Israel itself, which by a special mystery was a prophetic nation, and in other nations, before he came in the flesh. For since some are mentioned in the holy Hebrew books, already from the time of Abraham, who were neither of his fleshly stock nor of the people of Israel nor joined to the people of Israel as foreigners, and yet were partakers of this sacrament, why should we not believe that in the other nations too, here and there, there were others at other times, though we do not read of them mentioned in the same authorities? Thus the salvation of this religion, through which alone true salvation is truly promised, was never lacking to anyone who was worthy, and he to whom it was lacking was not worthy. And from the beginning of human propagation to the end it is preached, to some for reward, to some for judgment. And so those to whom it was not announced at all were foreknown as not going to believe; and those to whom it was announced though they would not believe are shown as an example of the former; but those to whom it is announced who will believe are being prepared for the kingdom of heaven and the fellowship of the holy angels.

### Translation notes

- Examples of such outsiders in Scripture would be Melchizedek and Job (not named here). The statements on worthiness and foreknowledge are translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.15 (CSEL 34.2:557–558; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-15).

## Letter 102.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:558
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The third question objects that Christians condemn pagan sacrifices though their own God once required offerings.

### Latin text

III. DE SACRIFICIORUM DISTINCTIONE. Iam uideamus eam, quae sequitur, quaestionem. <accusant, inquit, ritus sacrorum, hostias, tura et cetera, quae templorum cultus exercuit, cum idem cultus ab ipsis, inquit, uel a deo, quem colunt, exorsus est temporibus priscis, cum inducitur deus primitiis eguisse.

### English translation (Claude)

III. On the distinction of sacrifices. Now let us look at the question that follows. “They condemn,” he says, “the rites of sacrifice, victims, incense and the rest that the worship of the temples practised, though the same worship,” he says, “began in ancient times with them, or with the God whom they worship, since God is represented as having needed first-fruits.”

### Scripture references

- Gen 4:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Gen 4:3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.16 (CSEL 34.2:558; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-16).

## Letter 102.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:558–559
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sacrifice is as old as Cain and Abel and is owed only to the true God, who needs nothing; sacrifices are signs of spiritual realities.

### Latin text

Huic respondetur, quoniam ex illo scripturarum nostrarum loco haec quaestio proposita agnoscitur, ubi scriptum est Cain ex fructibus terrae Abel autem ex primitiuis ouium obtulisse munus deo, hinc potius esse intellegendum, quam sit res antiqua sacrificium, quod non nisi uni uero deo offerri oportere ueraces et sacrae litterae monent, non quod illo egeat deus, cum in eisdem ipsis litteris apertissime scriptum sit: Dixi domino: Deus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges sed quod etiam in his uel acceptandis uel reprobandis uel percipiendis non nisi hominibus consulat. nobis enim prodest colere deum, non ipsi deo. cum ergo inspirat et docet, quo modo colendus sit, non solum sua nulla indigentia facit sed nostra maxima utilitate. significatiua sunt autem omnia talia sacrificia et quarundam rerum similitudines, quibus admoneri nos oportet ad ea ipsa, quorum similitudines sunt, siue scrutanda siue noscenda siue recolenda. de qua re, quantum satis est, disserenda non breuis sermo flagitandus est, quo nunc respondere nobis propositum est, praesertim quia in aliis opusculis nostris de hac re multa iam diximus et, qui ante nos dei eloquia tractauerunt, de similitudinibus sacrificiorum ueteris testamenti tamquam umbris figurisque futurorum copiose locuti sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

To this the answer is that, since this question is recognized as raised from that passage of our Scriptures where it is written that Cain offered a gift to God from the fruits of the earth and Abel from the firstlings of the sheep, one should rather understand from it how ancient a thing sacrifice is, which the true and sacred writings warn must be offered to none but the one true God; not that God needs it, since in those very writings it is most plainly written, “I said to the Lord, You are my God, for you have no need of my goods”, but that even in accepting, rejecting or receiving these he takes thought only for men. For worshipping God benefits us, not God himself. When therefore he inspires and teaches how he is to be worshipped, he does it not from any need of his own but for our very great benefit. All such sacrifices are significant, likenesses of certain things, by which we ought to be reminded of the very things they are likenesses of, whether to search them out, or know them, or recall them. To discuss this sufficiently would require no brief discourse, whereas our purpose now is to answer briefly; especially since in other little works of ours we have already said much on this, and those who expounded God's words before us have spoken copiously of the likenesses of the sacrifices of the Old Testament as shadows and figures of things to come.

### Scripture references

- Gen 4:3: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 16:2 (15:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Heb 10:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Gen 4:3–4; Ps 16:2 (15:2 LXX); Col 2:17; Heb 10:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.17 (CSEL 34.2:558–559; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-17).

## Letter 102.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:559–560
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Demons demand temples and sacrifices because they know these belong to God; the fault of paganism is offering them to idols and demons.

### Latin text

Hoc sane nec in ista breuitate praetereundum est, quod templum, sacerdotem, sacrificium et alia quaecumque ad haec pertinentia nisi uni uero deo deberi nossent dii falsi, hoc est daemones, qui sunt praeuaricatores angeli, numquam haec sibi a cultoribus suis, quos decipiunt, expetissent. uerum haec cum exhibentur deo secundum eius inspirationem atque doctrinam, uera religio est, cum autem daemonibus secundum eorum impiam superbiam, noxia superstitio. quapropter qui Christianas litteras utriusque testamenti sciunt, non hoc culpant in sacrilegis ritibus paganorum, quod construant templa et instituant sacerdotia et faciant sacrificia, sed quod haec idolis et daemoniis exhibeant. et idola quidem omni sensu carere quis dubitet? uerum tamen cum his locantur sedibus honorabili sublimitate, ut a precantibus atque immolantibus adtendantur, ipsa similitudine animatorum membrorum atque sensuum quamuis insensata et exanima afficiunt infirmos animos, ut uiuere ac spirare uideantur accedente praesertim ueneratione multitudinis, qua tantus eis cultus inpenditur.

### English translation (Claude)

This at least must not be passed over even in this brevity: that the false gods, that is, the demons, who are fallen angels, would never have demanded a temple, priest, sacrifice and whatever else belongs to these from their worshippers whom they deceive, had they not known that these are owed only to the one true God. But when these are offered to God according to his inspiration and teaching, it is true religion; when offered to demons according to their ungodly pride, it is harmful superstition. Therefore those who know the Christian writings of both testaments do not blame the sacrilegious rites of the pagans for building temples, instituting priesthoods and making sacrifices, but for offering these to idols and demons. And who would doubt that idols lack all sense? Yet when they are placed on seats of honourable height, so as to be looked at by those who pray and sacrifice, by the very likeness of living members and senses, though senseless and lifeless, they affect weak minds so that they seem to live and breathe, especially when the veneration of the multitude is added, by which such great worship is paid them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.18 (CSEL 34.2:559–560; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-18).

## Letter 102.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:560–561
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture mocks senseless idols and identifies the gods of the nations as demons; true religion condemns sacrifice to demons, not sacrifice as such.

### Latin text

Quibus morbidis et pestilentiosis affectibus mederetur scriptura diuina, quae rem quidem notam sed tamen salubri remedio admonitionis inculcat dicens: Oculos habent et non uident, aures habent et non audiunt et cetera talia. haec enim uerba quo magis aperta et populariter uera sunt, eo magis incutiunt salubrem pudorem illis, qui, cum talibus simulacris diuinum cum timore cultum exhibent eaque uiuentibus similia uenerantes adorantesque contuentur eisque uelut praesentibus preces allegant, uictimas immolant, uota persoluunt, sic afficiuntur omnino, ut ea sensu carentia putare non audeant. ne arbitrentur autem isti hoc solum nostros libros uelle sonare, quod huiusce modi affectus humano cordi ex idolis innascitur, apertissime scriptum est: Quoniam omnes dii gentium daemonia. unde et apostolica disciplina non solum dicit, quod apud Iohannem legitur: Fratres, cauete a simulacris, uerum etiam quod apud Paulum: Quid ergo dico? quod idolis immolatum sit aliquid aut idolum est aliquid? sed quae immolant gentes, daemoniis et non deo immolant; nolo autem uos socios fieri daemoniorum. unde satis intellegi potest non tam ipsam immolationem, nam uero deo prisci sancti immolauerunt, sed quod diis falsis et impiis daemoniis immolatur, reprehendi a uera religione in superstitionibus gentium. sicut enim ueritas hortatur homines fieri socios sanctorum angelorum, ita seducit impietas ad societatem daemoniorum, cui praeparatur ignis aeternus sicut regnum aeternum societati sanctorum.

### English translation (Claude)

These morbid and pestilent affections the divine Scripture would heal, which inculcates a thing well known but with the wholesome remedy of warning, saying, “They have eyes and do not see, they have ears and do not hear”, and the rest. For these words, the more obvious and popularly true they are, the more they strike a wholesome shame into those who, when they pay divine worship with fear to such images and gaze on them, venerating and adoring them as like living beings, and address prayers to them as if present, sacrifice victims, pay vows, are so affected that they do not dare think them without sense. But lest these people think that our books mean to say only that affections of this kind arise in the human heart from idols, it is most plainly written: “For all the gods of the nations are demons.” Hence the apostolic teaching says not only what is read in John, “Brothers, guard yourselves from idols”, but also what is read in Paul: “What then do I say? That what is sacrificed to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? But what the nations sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God; and I do not want you to become partners with demons.” From this it can be sufficiently understood that it is not so much sacrifice itself (for the holy men of old sacrificed to the true God) but sacrifice to false gods and ungodly demons that true religion condemns in the superstitions of the nations. For as truth urges men to become partners of the holy angels, so ungodliness seduces them to fellowship with the demons, for which eternal fire is prepared, as an eternal kingdom is for the fellowship of the saints.

### Scripture references

- Ps 115:5 (113:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 115:6 (113:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 96:5 (95:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 5:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:41: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 115:5–6 (113:13–14 LXX); Ps 96:5 (95:5 LXX); 1 John 5:21; 1 Cor 10:19–20. Allusion: Matt 25:41. In the Latin, 1 John 5:21 begins “Brothers” instead of “Little children”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.19 (CSEL 34.2:560–561; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-19).

## Letter 102.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:561–563
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Allegorical interpretations of pagan rites point to creatures, not the Creator; sacrifice is owed to God alone, and holy angels and men refuse it.

### Latin text

Neque illinc excusant impii sua sacrilega sacra et simulacra, quod eleganter interpretantur, quid quaeque significent. omnis quippe illa interpretatio ad creaturam refertur, non ad creatorem, cui uni debetur seruitus religionis illa, quae uno nomine λατρεία Graece appellatur. nec nos dicimus terram, maria, caelum, solem, lunam, stellas et quasdam non in promptu sitas aelites potestates esse daemonia; sed cum omnis creatura partim corporalis sit partim uero incorporalis, quam etiam spiritalem uocamus, manifestum est id, quod a nobis pie ac religiose fit, a uoluntate animi proficisci, quae creatura spiritalis est et omni corporali praeponenda. unde colligitur corporali creaturae non esse sacrificandum. restat spiritalis, quae uel pia uel impia est: pia scilicet in hominibus et angelis iustis et deo rite seruientibus, impia uero in hominibus et angelis iniquis, quos etiam daemones dicimus. ac per hoc nec spiritali quamuis iustae creaturae sacrificandum est, quoniam, quanto magis pia est et subdita deo, tanto minus se tali honore dignatur, quem scit non deberi nisi deo. quanto ergo perniciosius est sacrificare daemoniis, hoc est iniquae spiritali creaturae, quae in hoc proximo et caliginoso caelo habitans tamquam in aerio carcere suo praedestinata est supplicio sempiterno! quam ob rem etiam cum se homines superioribus caelestibus potestatibus, quae non sunt daemonia, sacrificare dicunt et solius nominis interesse arbitrantur, quod illi deos, nos eos angelos appellamus, non se opponant eis ludificandis multiplici fallacia nisi daemones, qui errore delectantur et quodam modo pascuntur humano, quoniam sancti angeli non adprobant sacrificium, nisi quod ex doctrina uerae sapientiae ueraeque religionis offertur uni uero deo, cui sancta societate deseruiunt. proinde sicut impia superbia siue hominum siue daemonum sibi hos diuinos honores exhiberi uel iubet uel cupit, ita pia humilitas uel hominum uel angelorum sanctorum haec sibi oblata recusauit et, cui deberentur, ostendit. cuius rei manifestissima in sacris litteris nostris exempla monstrantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor do the ungodly excuse their sacrilegious rites and images by elegantly interpreting what each signifies. For all that interpretation refers to the creature, not to the Creator, to whom alone is owed that service of religion which is called by one word in Greek, latreia. Nor do we say that the earth, the seas, the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars and certain heavenly powers not readily seen are demons; but since all creation is partly corporeal and partly incorporeal, which we also call spiritual, it is clear that what we do piously and religiously proceeds from the will of the mind, which is a spiritual creature and to be preferred to every corporeal one. From this it follows that sacrifice is not to be offered to a corporeal creature. There remains the spiritual, which is either godly or ungodly: godly in righteous men and angels who rightly serve God, ungodly in wicked men and angels, whom we also call demons. And so sacrifice is not to be offered even to a spiritual creature, however righteous, since the more godly it is and subject to God, the less it deems itself worthy of such an honour, which it knows is owed only to God. How much more ruinous, then, is it to sacrifice to demons, that is, to a wicked spiritual creature, which, dwelling in this nearest and misty sky as in its prison of air, is predestined to eternal punishment! Therefore, even when men say they sacrifice to the higher heavenly powers, which are not demons, and think the difference is only one of name, because they call them gods and we call them angels, none but demons present themselves to mock them with manifold deceit, demons who delight in and in a way feed on human error; for the holy angels approve no sacrifice except that which, according to the teaching of true wisdom and true religion, is offered to the one true God, whom they serve in holy fellowship. So, just as the ungodly pride of men or demons commands or desires that these divine honours be shown to itself, so the godly humility of men or holy angels has refused them when offered and has shown to whom they were owed. Of this the most manifest examples are shown in our sacred writings.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:25: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 2:2: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Pet 2:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 10:26: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 14:15: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 19:10: allusion, medium confidence
- Rev 22:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text's “Xatpeta” is an OCR of the Greek λατρεία (religious service), corrected. “Aelites” is unclear (perhaps “caelites”, heavenly beings) and is translated by sense. References: Rom 1:25; Eph 2:2; 2 Pet 2:4; Acts 10:25–26; Acts 14:14–15; Rev 19:10; Rev 22:8–9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.20 (CSEL 34.2:561–563; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-20).

## Letter 102.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:563
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's word foretold that the sacrifices would change with the coming of Christ's one sacrifice, without any change in God or religion.

### Latin text

Dispertita autem diuinis eloquiis sacrificia pro temporum congruentia, ut alia fierent ante manifestationem noui testamenti, quod ex ipsa uera et unius sacerdotis uictima, hoc est ex fuso Christi sanguine ministratur, et aliud nunc, quod huic manifestationi congruum, qui iam declarato nomine Christiani appellamur, offerimus, non solum euangelicis uerum etiam propheticis litteris demonstratur. mutatio quippe non dei non ipsius religionis sed sacrificiorum et sacramentorum inpudenter nunc uideretur praedicata, nisi fuisset ante praedicta. quem ad modum enim unus idemque homo, si deo mane aliud offerat aliud uespere pro congruentia diurni temporis, non deum mutat nec religionem sicut nec salutem, qui alio modo mane alio uespere salutat, ita in uniuerso tractu saeculorum, cum aliud oblatum est ab antiquis sanctis aliud ab eis, qui nunc sunt, offertur, non humana praesumptione sed auctoritate diuina temporibus congrua sacra mysteria celebrantur, non deus aut religio commutatur.

### English translation (Claude)

That sacrifices were distributed in the divine words according to the suitability of times, so that some were made before the manifestation of the New Testament, which is administered from the one true victim of the one priest, that is, from the shed blood of Christ, and another is now offered, suited to this manifestation, by us who, the name now declared, are called Christians, is shown not only in the Gospel writings but also in the prophetic ones. For a change, not of God nor of religion itself but of sacrifices and sacraments, would now seem shamelessly preached had it not been foretold before. For just as one and the same man, if he offers God one thing in the morning and another in the evening according to the suitability of the time of day, does not change God or religion, just as he who greets in one way in the morning and another in the evening does not change his greeting; so in the whole course of the ages, when one thing was offered by the ancient saints and another is offered by those who now live, sacred mysteries suited to the times are celebrated not by human presumption but by divine authority, and neither God nor religion is changed.

### Scripture references

- Heb 9:12: allusion, high confidence
- Mal 1:11: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 11:26: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Heb 9:12–14; Mal 1:11 (foretelling the new sacrifice); Acts 11:26. The sacrifice “now offered” by Christians is the Eucharist; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.21 (CSEL 34.2:563; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-21).

## Letter 102.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:563–564
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The fourth question claims that Christ's eternal punishment contradicts his saying about being repaid by the same measure.

### Latin text

IV. DE EO QVOD SCRIPTUM EST: IN QVA MENSURA MENSI FUERITIS, REMETIETUR VOBIS. Iam nunc deinde uideamus, quale sit, quod de mensura peccati atque supplicii proposuit sic euangelio calumniatus: Minatur, inquit, Christus sibi non credentibus aeterna supplicia et alibi ait: In qua mensura mensi fueritis, in ea remetietur uobis, satis, inquit, ridicule atque contrarie; nam si ad mensuram redditurus est poenam et omnis mensura circumscripta est fine temporis, quid sibi uolunt minae infiniti supplicii?

### English translation (Claude)

IV. On what is written: “With the measure you measure, it will be measured to you again.” Now next let us see what kind of thing it is that he proposed about the measure of sin and punishment, slandering the Gospel thus: “Christ threatens eternal punishments to those who do not believe him, and elsewhere he says, ‘With the measure you measure, it will be measured to you again’: rather ridiculously and contradictorily,” he says; “for if he will render punishment by measure, and every measure is bounded by an end in time, what is the meaning of the threats of infinite punishment?”

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:2: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:38: quotation, medium confidence
- Matt 25:46: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and references: Matt 7:2; Luke 6:38; Matt 25:46.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.22 (CSEL 34.2:563–564; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-22).

## Letter 102.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:564–565
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Not every measure is one of time; even the sun, which pagans think everlasting, has a measure, so eternal punishment can be measured.

### Latin text

Istam quaestionem a qualicumque philosopho esse obiectam atque propositam difficile est credere, quippe qui ait: <Omnia mensura circumscribitur tempore, quasi non soleat nisi temporum esse mensura sicut horarum et dierum et annorum. uel sicut dicimus breuem syllabam simplum habere temporis ad syllabam longam. puto enim modios et rabones, urnas et amphoras non temporum esse mensuras. quo modo ergo omnis mensura circumscribitur tempore? nonne ipsi dicunt solem istum sempiternum esse? qui tamen quantus sit ad terram, mensuris geometricis perscrutari audent et renuntiare. quod siue possit siue non possit, constat eum tamen propriam sui orbis habere mensuram, quia et, si comprehendunt, quantus sit, mensuram eius comprehendunt et, si hoc non adsequuntur, mensuram eius utique non comprehendunt nec ideo nulla est, quia homines eam nosse non possunt. potest igitur aliquid et sempiternum esse et certam sui modi habere mensuram. secundum ipsos enim de solis aeternitate locutus sum, ut sua sententia conuincantur atque concedant esse posse aliquid cum mensura sempiternum. ac sic non ideo putent non esse credendum de supplicio sempiterno, quod minatus est Christus, quia idem dixit: In qua mensura mensi fueritis, remetietur uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

It is hard to believe that this question was raised and proposed by any kind of philosopher, since he says, “Every measure is bounded by time”, as if measure were usually only of times, like hours, days and years, or as when we say that a short syllable has one unit of time compared with a long syllable. For I think that pecks and bushels, urns and amphorae are not measures of times. How then is every measure bounded by time? Do not they themselves say that this sun is everlasting? And yet they dare to investigate by geometrical measurements how large it is in relation to the earth, and to report it. Whether they can or cannot do this, it is agreed that it has its own measure of its orb; for if they grasp how large it is, they grasp its measure, and if they do not achieve this, they certainly do not grasp its measure; but it is not therefore nothing because men cannot know it. Something can therefore be both everlasting and have a definite measure of its own mode. I spoke of the eternity of the sun according to their view, so that they may be convicted by their own opinion and concede that something can be everlasting with a measure. And so let them not think that what Christ threatened about everlasting punishment is not to be believed because he also said, “With the measure you measure, it will be measured to you again.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 7:2. The digital text has the Latin word “rabones” among the dry measures (perhaps for “arabones” or a corruption); translated as “bushels” by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.23 (CSEL 34.2:564–565; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-23).

## Letter 102.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:565–566
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The saying about measure need not mean identical or equal-length punishment; it may be as great in force while longer in duration.

### Latin text

Si enim dixisset: (Quod mensi fueritis, hoc metietur uobis), etiam sic non omnino ad eandem rem ex omni parte necesse esset referre sententiam. possumus enim recte dicere: Quod plantaueris, hoc decerpes, quamuis nemo plantet pomum sed lignum, decerpat autem pomum magis quam lignum; sed illud dicimus secundum arboris genus, quia non ficum plantat, unde nucem decerpat. ita dici posset: Quod feceris, patieris, non ut, si stuprum fecerit, stuprum patiatur, sed quod peccato isto fecit legi, hoc ei lex faciat, id est quia legem talia prohibentem de sua uita abstulit, auferat eum etiam ipsa lex de hominum uita, quam regit. item si dixisset: Quantum mensi fueritis, tantum metietur uobis nec sic esset consequens, ut omni modo aequales peccatis poenas intellegere deberemus; neque enim aequalia sunt uerbi gratia triticum et hordeum et profecto dici posset: Quantum mensi fueritis, tantum metietur uobis, hoc est quantum tritici tantum hordei. quod si de doloribus ageretur atque diceretur: Quantum dolorem ingesseritis, tantus ingeretur uobis fieri posset, ut tantus dolor esset quamuis tempore diuturnior, hoc est mora maior, ui par. neque enim, si de duabus lucernis dicamus: Tantum ignis iste caluit, quantum ille ideo falsum erit, quia una earum forte citius extincta est. non itaque, si aliquid secundum aliud tantum est secundum aliud non est tantum, quia non in omni modo tantum est, ideo falsus est modus, in quo tantum est.

### English translation (Claude)

For if he had said, “What you have measured, this will be measured to you”, even so it would not be necessary to refer the saying to the same thing in every respect. For we can rightly say, “What you plant, this you will pluck”, though no one plants a fruit but a tree, and plucks fruit rather than a tree; but we say this according to the kind of tree, because one does not plant a fig tree to pluck a nut from it. So it could be said, “What you have done, you will suffer”, not that if someone commits sexual immorality he should suffer sexual immorality, but that what he did to the law by this sin the law should do to him; that is, because he took out of his life the law that forbids such things, the law itself should take him out of the life of men which it governs. Again, if he had said, “As much as you have measured, so much will be measured to you”, even so it would not follow that we must understand penalties equal to sins in every way; for wheat and barley, for example, are not equal, and yet it could be said, “As much as you have measured, so much will be measured to you”, that is, as much barley as wheat. And if it concerned pains and it were said, “As great a pain as you have inflicted, so great a pain will be inflicted on you”, it could be that the pain would be as great, though longer in time, that is, greater in duration and equal in force. For if we say of two lamps, “This fire was as hot as that”, it will not be false because one of them was perhaps put out sooner. So if something is as great in one respect and not as great in another, because it is not as great in every way, the respect in which it is as great is not therefore false.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:7: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The illustration of the law putting a sinner to death (for stuprum, “sexual immorality”) is Augustine's own; translated as written. Compare Gal 6:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.24 (CSEL 34.2:565–566; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-1/#p-102-24).

## Letter 102.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:566–567
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The measure differs from what is measured, and in context Christ means that each will be judged in the very will and judgment by which he acted.

### Latin text

Cum uero dixerit: In qua mensura mensi fueritis, metietur uobis cumque manifestum sit aliud esse mensuram, in qua metitur aliquid, aliud ipsam rem, quae metitur, iam fieri potest, ut, in qua mensura homines mensi essent uerbi gratia modium tritici, in ea illis metirentur milia modiorum, ut et tam multum interesset in quantitate frumenti et nihil in mensura, ut taceam de ipsarum rerum diuersitate, quia non solum fieri potest, ut, in qua mensura quisque mensus fuerit hordeum, in ea illi metiatur triticum, sed in qua mensura mensus fuerit frumentum, in ea illi metiatur aurum et frumenti sit unus modius auri autem quam plurimi. ita cum sine comparatione rerum ipsarum et genus et quantitas differat, dici tamen rectissime potest: In qua mensura mensus est, in ea illi metitum est. unde autem hoc dixerit Christus, paulo superius satis elucet: Nolite, inquit, iudicare, ut non iudicemini; in quo enim iudicio iudicaueritis, iudicabimini. numquid si iniquo iudicio iudicabunt, iniquo iudicabuntur? absit. nulla quippe iniquitas apud deum. sed ita dictum est: In quo iudicio iudicaueritis, in eo iudicabimini, tamquam diceretur: In qua uoluntate benefeceritis, in ipsa liberabimini, uel: In qua uoluntate malefeceritis, in ipsa puniemini, uelut, si quispiam ad turpem concupiscentiam oculis utens excaecari iuberetur, recte utique audiret: In quibus oculis peccasti, in eis supplicium meruisti. iudicio enim quisque animi sui seu bono seu malo utitur uel ad benefaciendum uel ad peccandum. unde non iniquum est, ut, in quo iudicat, in eo iudicetur, hoc est ut in ipso animi sui iudicio poenas luat, cum ea mala patitur, quae male iudicantem animum consequuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

But since he said, “With the measure you measure, it will be measured to you”, and it is clear that the measure in which something is measured is one thing and the thing measured another, it can happen that in the measure in which men measured, say, a peck of wheat, thousands of pecks may be measured to them, so that there is a great difference in the quantity of grain and none in the measure; not to mention the difference of the things themselves, since it can happen not only that in the measure in which someone measured barley, wheat is measured to him, but that in the measure in which he measured grain, gold is measured to him, one peck of grain and very many of gold. So, though both kind and quantity differ beyond comparison of the things themselves, it can still be said most correctly: “In the measure in which he measured, in it it was measured to him.” And why Christ said this is quite clear a little earlier: “Judge not,” he says, “that you be not judged; for with the judgment you judge you will be judged.” If they judge with unjust judgment, will they be judged with unjust judgment? Far from it; for there is no injustice with God. But it was said, “With the judgment you judge you will be judged”, as if it were said, “In the will in which you have done good, in it you will be set free”, or, “In the will in which you have done evil, in it you will be punished”; as, if someone who used his eyes for shameful lust were ordered to be blinded, he would rightly hear: “In the eyes in which you sinned, in them you have deserved punishment.” For each uses the judgment of his mind, good or bad, either to do good or to sin. Hence it is not unjust that he be judged in that in which he judges, that is, that he pay the penalty in the very judgment of his mind, when he suffers the evils that follow a mind that judges badly.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 7:2; Matt 7:1–2; Rom 9:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.25 (CSEL 34.2:566–567; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-25).

## Letter 102.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:567–568
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sin is measured by the will, not by duration; so punishments may be equally eternal yet differ in severity.

### Latin text

Alia namque sunt manifesta tormenta, quae post futura praeparantur, etiam ipsa ex eodem malae uoluntatis cardine adtracta; in ipso autem animo, ubi appetitus uoluntatis humanorum omnium est mensura factorum, continuo poena sequitur culpam plerumque maior non sentientis caecitate grauiore. ideo cum dixisset: In quo iudicio iudicaueritis, iudicabimini, secutus adiunxit: Et qua mensura mensi fueritis, metietur uobis. in uoluntate quippe propria metietur bonus homo bona facta et in ea metietur ei beatitudo, itemque in uoluntate propria metietur malus homo mala opera et in ea metietur ei miseria, quoniam, ubi quisque bonus est, cum bene uult, ibi etiam malus, cum male uult. ac per hoc ibi etiam fit uel beatus uel miser, hoc est in ipso suae uoluntatis affectu, quae omnium factorum meritorumque mensura est. ex qualitatibus quippe uoluntatum non ex temporum spatiis siue recte facta siue peccata metimur. alioquin maius peccatum haberetur arborem deicere quam hominem occidere; illud enim fit longa mora ictibus multis, hoc uno ictu breuissimo tempore. pro quo tamen exigui temporis tam grandi peccato si perpetua deportatione homo puniretur, etiam mitius cum illo actum, quam dignus fuerat, diceretur, quamuis in spatio temporali longitudo poenae cum breuitate facinoris nullo modo sit comparanda. quid ergo contrarium est, si erunt pariter longa uel etiam pariter aeterna supplicia sed aliis alia mitiora uel acriora, ut, quibus tempus aequale est, non sit aequalis asperitas propter mensuram etiam peccatorum non in productione temporum sed in uoluntate peccantium?

### English translation (Claude)

For there are other, manifest torments prepared to come afterwards, they too drawn from the same hinge of the evil will; but in the mind itself, where the desire of the will is the measure of all human deeds, punishment follows guilt at once, often greater in one who does not feel it, by a heavier blindness. Therefore, having said, “With the judgment you judge you will be judged”, he went on to add: “And with the measure you measure, it will be measured to you.” For in his own will the good man will measure good deeds, and in it happiness will be measured to him; and likewise in his own will the bad man will measure evil works, and in it misery will be measured to him; since where each is good, when he wills well, there too he is bad, when he wills badly. And so there too he becomes either happy or miserable, that is, in the very disposition of his will, which is the measure of all deeds and deserts. For we measure right deeds or sins by the qualities of wills, not by lengths of time. Otherwise it would be thought a greater sin to fell a tree than to kill a man; for the one is done over a long time with many blows, the other with one blow in a very short time. Yet if a man were punished with perpetual deportation for so great a sin of so short a time, it would be said that he was treated even more mildly than he deserved, though in temporal duration the length of the punishment can in no way be compared with the brevity of the crime. What contradiction is there, then, if punishments are equally long, or even equally eternal, but some milder and others harsher than others, so that for those whose time is equal the severity is not equal, because the measure of sins too lies not in the extension of times but in the will of the sinners?

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 7:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.26 (CSEL 34.2:567–568; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-26).

## Letter 102.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:568–569
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Eternal punishment answers the sinner's will to enjoy sin eternally, so it is consistent with the saying about measure.

### Latin text

Voluntas quippe ipsa punitur sine animi supplicio sine corporis, ut, quae delectatur in peccatis, ipsa plectatur in poenis et ut, qui iudicat sine misericordia, sine misericordia iudicetur. et in hac quippe sententia ad hoc solum eadem mensura est, ut, quod non praestitit, non ei praestetur atque ita, quod ipse iudicatur, aeternum erit, quamuis, quod iudicauit, aeternum esse nequiuerit. in eadem igitur mensura quamuis non aeternorum malefactorum aeterna supplicia remetiuntur, ut, quia aeternam uoluit habere peccati perfruitionem, aeternam inueniat uindictae seueritatem. non autem sinit proposita breuitas responsionis meae, ut colligam omnia uel certe quam plurima, quae de peccatis et de peccatorum poenis sancti libri habent, atque ex his unam eruam sine ulla ambiguitate sententiam, si tamen id ualeam uiribus mentis, etiam si congruum nanciscar otium. nunc tamen arbitror satis esse monstratum non esse contrarium aeternitati suppliciorum, quod in eadem mensura redduntur, in qua peccata commissa sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

For the will itself is punished, whether by punishment of the mind or of the body, so that the will that delights in sins is itself struck in penalties, and so that “he who judges without mercy will be judged without mercy.” In this saying the measure is the same only in this respect: that what he did not grant is not granted to him; and so his being judged will be eternal, though his judging could not be eternal. In the same measure, therefore, eternal punishments are measured back for evil deeds not eternal, so that, because he wished to have eternal enjoyment of sin, he may find eternal severity of vengeance. But the brevity I have set myself in my reply does not allow me to collect all, or at least very many, of the things the holy books contain about sins and the punishments of sins, and to draw from them one sentence without any ambiguity, if indeed I could do so with the strength of my mind, even if I found suitable leisure. Yet I think it has now been sufficiently shown that it is not contrary to the eternity of punishments that they are rendered in the same measure in which sins were committed.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Jas 2:13. The doctrine of eternal punishment is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.27 (CSEL 34.2:568–569; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-27).

## Letter 102.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:569
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The fifth question asks whether Solomon said that God has no son.

### Latin text

V. DE FILIO DEI SECUNDUM SALOMONEM. Post hanc quaestionem, qui eas ex Porphyrio proposuit, hoc adiunxit: "Sane etiam de illo", inquit, me dignaberis instruere, si uere dixit Salomon: Filium deus non habet.

### English translation (Claude)

V. On the Son of God according to Solomon. After this question, he who put them forward from Porphyry added this: “Please also instruct me about this: whether Solomon truly said, ‘God has no son.’”

### Translation notes

- The saying “God has no son” is not found in Solomon's books; Augustine answers accordingly.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.28 (CSEL 34.2:569; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-28).

## Letter 102.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:569–570
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Solomon did not deny that God has a son but spoke of him, as in Proverbs 8 and 30, which Augustine reads of Christ.

### Latin text

Cito respondetur: Non solum hoc non dixit, uerum etiam dixit, quod deus habeat filium. apud eum enim sapientia loquens ait: Ante omnes colles genuit me. et quid est Christus nisi dei sapientia? item quodam loco prouerbiorum: Deus, inquit, docuit me sapientiam et scientiam sanctorum cognoui. quis ascendit in caelum et descendit? quis colligit uentos in sinu? quis conuertit aquam in uestimento? quis tenuit fines terrae? quod nomen est ei aut quod nomen est filii eius? horum duorum, quae in extremo commemoraui, unum rettulit ad patrem, id est quod nomen est ei propter quod dixerat deus docuit me sapientiam, et alterum euidenter ad filium, cum ait aut quod nomen est filii eius, propter cetera, quae de filio magis intelleguntur, hoc est quis ascendit in caelum et descendit, quod Paulus ita commemorat: Qui descendit, ipse est, et qui ascendit super omnes caelos; quis colligit uentos in sinum? id est animas credentium in occultum atque secretum, quibus dicitur: Mortui enim estis et uita uestra abscondita est cum Christo in deo; quis conuertit aquam in uestimento? ut dici posset: Quotquot in Christo baptizati estis, Christum induistis; quis tenuit fines terrae? qui dixit discipulis suis: Eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in tota Iudaea et Samaria et usque in fines terrae.

### English translation (Claude)

The answer is quick: not only did he not say this, but he even said that God has a son. For in his book Wisdom speaks and says: “Before all the hills he begot me.” And what is Christ but the Wisdom of God? Again, in a certain place of the Proverbs he says: “God taught me wisdom, and I have known the knowledge of the holy. Who has ascended into heaven and descended? Who has gathered the winds in his bosom? Who has turned water into a garment? Who has held the ends of the earth? What is his name, or what is the name of his son?” Of these two things I mentioned last, he referred one to the Father, namely, “what is his name”, because he had said, “God taught me wisdom”; and the other plainly to the Son, when he says, “or what is the name of his son”, because of the other things, which are understood rather of the Son: that is, “Who has ascended into heaven and descended?”, which Paul recalls thus: “He who descended is the same as he who ascended above all the heavens”; “Who has gathered the winds into his bosom?”, that is, the souls of believers into a hidden and secret place, to whom it is said, “For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God”; “Who has turned water into a garment?”, so that it could be said, “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ”; “Who has held the ends of the earth?”, he who said to his disciples, “You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria and to the ends of the earth.”

### Scripture references

- Prov 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:24: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 30:3: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 30:4: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:10: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:27: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Prov 8:25; 1 Cor 1:24; Prov 30:3–4 (Old Latin form); Eph 4:10; Col 3:3; Gal 3:27; Acts 1:8. The Christological reading of Proverbs is Augustine's; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.29 (CSEL 34.2:569–570; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-29).

## Letter 102.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:570
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The sixth question, from pagan mockery, asks how Jonah survived in the whale and what the gourd meant.

### Latin text

VI. DE IONA PROPHETA. Postrema quaestio proposita est de Iona nec ipsa quasi ex Porphyrio sed tamquam ex inrisione paganorum; sic enim posita est: Deinde quid sentire, inquit, debemus de Iona, qui dicitur in uentre ceti triduo fuisse? quod satis ἀπίθανον est et incredibile transuoratum cum ueste hominem fuisse in corde piscis; aut si figura est, hanc dignaberis pandere. deinde quid sibi etiam illud uult supra euomitum Ionam cucurbitam natam? quid causae fuit, ut haec nasceretur? hoc enim genus quaestionis multo cachinno a paganis grauiter inrisum animaduerti.»

### English translation (Claude)

VI. On the prophet Jonah. The last question proposed was about Jonah, and not as if from Porphyry but as from the mockery of the pagans; for it was put thus: “Then what are we to think,” he says, “of Jonah, who is said to have been three days in the belly of a whale? It is quite implausible (apithanon) and incredible that a man swallowed with his clothes should have been inside a fish. Or, if it is a figure, please explain it. Then, what is the meaning of the gourd that sprang up above Jonah after he was vomited out? What was the reason for its springing up?” For I have noticed that this kind of question is greatly mocked by the pagans with much laughter.

### Scripture references

- Jonah 1:17 (2:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 4:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Greek word ἀπίθανον (“implausible”) is in the original. References: Jonah 1:17 (2:1 LXX and Hebrew); Jonah 4:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.30 (CSEL 34.2:570; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-30).

## Letter 102.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:570–572
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jonah's preservation is no harder to believe than the resurrection; the monster's size, attested by ribs displayed at Carthage, made it possible, clothes or no clothes.

### Latin text

Ad hoc respondetur, quod aut omnia diuina miracula credenda non sint aut, hoc cur non credatur, causa nulla sit. in ipsum autem Christum, quod tertio die resurrexerit, non crederemus, si fides Christianorum cachinnum metueret paganorum. cum autem hinc quaestionem non proposuerit amicus noster, utrum credendum sit uel Lazarum quarto die resuscitatum esse uel ipsum Christum tertio die resurrexisse, multum miror hoc, quod factum est de Iona, eum pro incredibili posuisse, nisi forte facilius putat mortuum de sepulcro resuscitari quam uiuum in tam uasto uentre beluae potuisse seruari. ut enim omittam commemorare, quanta magnitudo beluarum marinarum ab eis, qui experti sunt, indicetur, uenter, quem costae illae muniebant, quae Carthagine in publico fixae populo notae sunt, quot homines in spatio suo capere posset, quis non coniciat? quanto hiatu patebat os illud, quod uelut ianua speluncae illius fuit! nisi forte, ut posuit, uestis esset impedimento, ne Ionas uorari posset inlaesus, quasi per angusta sese coartauerit, qui per abruptum aeris praecipitatus sic exceptus est, ut prius reciperetur uentre bestiae, quam dente laceraretur. quamquam scriptura neque nudum neque uestitum in illud antrum deiectum esse dixerit, ut possit intellegi illuc etiam nudus inruisse, si forte opus erat tamquam ouo conum ita illi uestem detrahi, quo facilius sorberetur. sic enim sunt homines de prophetae huius ueste solliciti, quasi aut per fenestram paruam repsisse aut in balneas intrasse dicatur, quo etiam si necesse esset intrare uestitum, uix molestum esset, non tamen mirum.

### English translation (Claude)

To this the answer is that either all divine miracles are not to be believed, or there is no reason why this one should not be believed. We would not believe in Christ himself, that he rose on the third day, if the faith of Christians feared the laughter of pagans. But since our friend did not put the question whether it is to be believed that Lazarus was raised on the fourth day, or that Christ himself rose on the third, I wonder greatly that he put forward as incredible what happened to Jonah; unless perhaps he thinks it easier for a dead man to be raised from the tomb than for a living man to be preserved in so vast a belly of a sea monster. For, to omit mentioning how great a size of sea monsters is reported by those who have seen them, who would not guess how many men that belly could hold in its space, protected by those ribs which are set up in public at Carthage and known to the people? How wide a gape that mouth must have opened, which was like the door of that cave! Unless perhaps, as he put it, the clothing was an obstacle to Jonah's being swallowed unharmed, as though he had squeezed himself through a narrow place, he who, thrown headlong through the air, was so received that he was taken into the beast's belly before he could be torn by its teeth. And yet Scripture did not say whether he was cast into that cavern naked or clothed, so that it can be understood that he rushed in even naked, if perhaps it was necessary that his clothing be stripped off him like a shell from an egg, so that he might be swallowed more easily. For men are as anxious about this prophet's clothing as if he were said to have crept through a small window or entered the baths; where, even if he had to enter clothed, it would be barely inconvenient, and certainly not a marvel.

### Scripture references

- John 11:39: allusion, medium confidence
- Jonah 1:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The phrase “tamquam ouo conum” is unclear in the digital text; translated by sense (“like a shell from an egg”). References: John 11:39; Jonah 1:15–17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.31 (CSEL 34.2:570–572; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-31).

## Letter 102.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:572
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who reject this miracle must reject all, including the three men in the furnace; pagans would admire it if told of Apuleius or Apollonius.

### Latin text

Sed habent re uera, quod non credant in diuino miraculo uaporem uentris, quo cibi madescunt, potuisse ita temperari, ut uitam hominis conseruaret. quanto incredibilius ergo proponerent tres illos uiros ab impio rege in caminum missos deambulasse in medio ignis inlaesos! quapropter si nulla isti diuina miracula uolunt credere, alia disputatione refellendi sunt. neque enim debent unum aliquid tamquam incredibile proponere et in quaestionem uocare sed omnia, quae uel talia uel etiam mirabiliora narrantur. et tamen si hoc, quod de Iona scriptum est, Apuleius Madaurensis uel Apollonius Tyaneus fecisse diceretur, quorum multa mira nullo fideli auctore iactitant, quamuis et daemones nonnulla faciant angelis sanctis similia non ueritate sed specie, non sapientia sed plane fallacia, tamen, si de istis, ut dixi, quos magos uel philosophos laudabiliter nominant, tale aliquid narraretur, non iam in buccis creparet risus sed typhus. ita rideant scripturas nostras; quantum possunt, rideant, dum per singulos dies rariores paucioresque se uideant uel moriendo uel credendo, dum implentur omnia, quae praedixerunt, qui hos contra ueritatem inaniter pugnaturos, uane latraturos, paulatim defecturos tanto ante riserunt nobisque posteris suis non solum ea legenda dimiserunt, uerum experienda promiserunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But they really have grounds for not believing that, by a divine miracle, the heat of the belly, by which food is softened, could be so tempered as to preserve a man's life! How much more incredible, then, would they find it that those three men, thrown into the furnace by the ungodly king, walked about unharmed in the midst of the fire! Therefore, if they will believe no divine miracles at all, they must be refuted by another discussion. For they ought not to put forward one thing as incredible and question it, but all things that are narrated, whether of this kind or even more marvellous. And yet, if what is written of Jonah were said to have been done by Apuleius of Madauros or Apollonius of Tyana, of whom they boast many marvels with no trustworthy authority (though demons too do some things like the holy angels, not in truth but in appearance, not by wisdom but plainly by deceit), still, if something of the kind were told, as I said, of these men whom they praise by calling them magicians or philosophers, it would no longer be laughter but pride that puffed their cheeks. So let them laugh at our Scriptures; let them laugh as much as they can, while day by day they see themselves becoming rarer and fewer, either by dying or by believing, while all those things are being fulfilled which were foretold by those who so long ago laughed at these people who would fight vainly against the truth, bark idly and gradually fail, and who left them to us their descendants not only to be read but promised that we would experience them.

### Scripture references

- Dan 3:25: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Dan 3:24–25. Apollonius of Tyana was a first-century Pythagorean wonder-worker whom pagan writers compared with Christ.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.32 (CSEL 34.2:572; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-32).

## Letter 102.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-33
- Source: CSEL 34.2:572–573
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: One may ask what Jonah's story signifies, but first believe it happened; God speaks by deeds as well as words.

### Latin text

Non sane absurde neque importune requiritur, quid ista significent, ut, cum hoc expositum fuerit, non tantum gesta sed etiam propter aliquam significationem conscripta esse credantur. prius ergo non dubitet Ionam prophetam in aluo ingenti marinae beluae triduo fuisse, qui uult scrutari, cur hoc factum sit; non enim frustra factum est, sed tamen factum est. si enim mouent ad fidem, quae figurate tantum dicta, non facta sunt, quanto magis mouere debent, quae figurate non tantum dicta sed facta sunt! nam sicut humana consuetudo uerbis ita diuina potentia etiam factis loquitur et, sicut sermoni humano uerba noua uel minus usitata moderate ac decenter aspersa splendorem addunt, ita in factis mirabilibus congruenter aliquid significantibus quodam modo luculentior est diuina eloquentia.

### English translation (Claude)

It is not at all absurd or out of place to ask what these things signify, so that, when this has been explained, they may be believed to have been not only done but also written for the sake of some meaning. First, then, let him who wishes to examine why it was done not doubt that the prophet Jonah was three days in the huge belly of a sea monster; for it was not done in vain, but it was done. For if things said only figuratively, not done, move us to faith, how much more ought those to move us which were not only said figuratively but done! For as human custom speaks by words, so divine power speaks also by deeds; and as new or less used words, sprinkled moderately and fittingly, add splendour to human speech, so in marvellous deeds that fittingly signify something the divine eloquence is in a way more brilliant.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.33 (CSEL 34.2:572–573; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-33).

## Letter 102.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-34
- Source: CSEL 34.2:573–574
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ himself explained Jonah's three days as a sign of his death and resurrection, after which the message reached the Gentiles as Jonah's reached Nineveh.

### Latin text

Proinde quid praefigurauerit, quod prophetam belua illa deuoratum tertio die uiuum reddidit, cur a nobis quaeritur, cum hoc Christus exponat? generatio, inquit, praua et adultera signum quaerit et signum non dabitur ei nisi signum Ionae prophetae; sicut enim Ionas fuit in uentre ceti tribus diebus et tribus noctibus, sic erit filius hominis in corde terrae tribus diebus et tribus noctibus. de ipso autem triduo mortis domini Christi quo modo ratio reddatur, cum a parte totum intellegitur in die primo et nouissimo, ut toti tres dies, id est cum suis noctibus computentur, longum est disserere et in aliis sermonibus iam saepissime dictum est. sicut ergo Ionas ex naui in aluum ceti ita Christus ex ligno in sepulcrum uel in mortis profundum et sicut ille pro his, qui tempestate periclitabantur, ita Christus pro his, qui in hoc saeculo fluctuant, et sicut primo iussum est, ut praedicaretur Nineuitis a Iona, sed non ad eos peruenit prophetia Ionae, nisi posteaquam eum cetus euomuit, ita prophetia praemissa est ad gentes, sed nisi post resurrectionem Christi non peruenit ad gentes.

### English translation (Claude)

Why, then, do they ask us what it prefigured that the monster which swallowed the prophet gave him back alive on the third day, when Christ explains it? “An evil and adulterous generation,” he says, “seeks a sign, and no sign will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah; for as Jonah was in the belly of the whale three days and three nights, so will the Son of Man be in the heart of the earth three days and three nights.” How an account is to be given of the three days of the death of the Lord Christ, since the whole is understood from a part in the first and last day, so that three whole days, that is, with their nights, are counted, would take long to discuss, and has already been said very often in other discourses. As, then, Jonah passed from the ship into the belly of the whale, so Christ from the tree into the tomb or into the depth of death; and as Jonah for those in danger in the storm, so Christ for those tossed on the waves of this world; and as Jonah was first commanded to preach to the Ninevites, but the prophecy of Jonah did not reach them until after the whale vomited him out, so prophecy was sent ahead to the Gentiles, but did not reach the Gentiles until after the resurrection of Christ.

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:39: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:40: quotation, high confidence
- Jonah 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 2:10: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 3:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 12:39–40. References: Jonah 1:2, 15; Jonah 2:10; Jonah 3:2–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.34 (CSEL 34.2:573–574; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-34).

## Letter 102.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-35
- Source: CSEL 34.2:574–575
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads Jonah under the gourd as carnal Israel, the gourd as the Old Testament promises, and the worm that withered it as Christ.

### Latin text

Iam uero quod tabernaculum sibi constituit et consedit ex aduerso ciuitatis Nineue, quid ei futurum esset, expectans, alterius significationis personam propheta gestabat. praefigurabat enim carnalem populum Israhel. nam huic erat et tristitia de salute Nineuitarum, hoc est de redemptione et liberatione gentium. unde uenit Christus uocare non iustos sed peccatores in paenitentiam. umbraculum ergo cucurbitae super caput eius promissiones erant ueteris testamenti uel ipsa iam munera, in quibus erat utique, sicut dicit apostolus, umbra futurorum tamquam ab aestu temporalium malorum in terra promissionis defensaculum praebens. uermis autem matutinus, quo rodente cucurbita exaruit, idem ipse rursus Christus occurrit, ex cuius ore euangelio diffamato cuncta illa, quae temporaliter apud Israhelitas uelut umbratili prius significatione uiguerunt, euacuata marcescunt. et nunc ille populus amisso Hierosolymitano regno et sacerdotio et sacrificio, quod totum umbra erat futuri, in captiua dispersione magno aestu tribulationis aduritur, sicut Ionas, quod scriptum est, a solis ardore et dolet grauiter et tamen dolori eius atque umbrae, quam diligebat, salus gentium paenitentiumque praeponitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, in setting up a booth for himself and sitting opposite the city of Nineveh, waiting to see what would happen to it, the prophet bore the person of another meaning. For he prefigured the carnal people of Israel. For they too were sad at the salvation of the Ninevites, that is, at the redemption and liberation of the Gentiles; whence Christ came to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance. The shade of the gourd over his head, then, was the promises of the Old Testament, or the gifts themselves already given, in which, as the apostle says, there was “a shadow of things to come”, offering protection from the heat of temporal evils in the land of promise. But the morning worm, by whose gnawing the gourd withered, again turns out to be Christ himself, from whose mouth the Gospel was spread abroad, and all those things which flourished temporally among the Israelites with a shadowy meaning before are emptied and wither. And now that people, having lost the kingdom of Jerusalem and the priesthood and the sacrifice, all of which was a shadow of what was to come, is scorched in captive dispersion by a great heat of tribulation, like Jonah, as it is written, by the heat of the sun, and grieves heavily; and yet the salvation of the Gentiles and the penitent is preferred to its grief and to the shade it loved.

### Scripture references

- Jonah 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 4:7: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The allegorical reading of Israel's dispersion is Augustine's; translated exactly as written, with a neutral note. References: Jonah 4:5–8; Matt 9:13; Col 2:17; Heb 10:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.35 (CSEL 34.2:574–575; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-35).

## Letter 102.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-36
- Source: CSEL 34.2:575–576
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The “morning worm” is Christ, who calls himself a worm in Psalm 22 and rose at dawn; let the pagans laugh, for they are being consumed.

### Latin text

Adhuc cachinnent pagani et iam uermem Christum et hanc interpretationem prophetici sacramenti superbiore garrulitate derideant, dum tamen et ipsos sensim paulatimque consumat. nam de omnibus talibus Esaias prophetat, per quem nobis dicit deus: Audite me, qui scitis iudicium, populus meus, in quorum corde lex mea est. opprobria hominum nolite metuere et detractione eorum ne superemini nec, quod uos spernant, magni duxeritis. sicut enim uestimentum ita per tempus absumentur et sicut lana a tinea comedentur; iustitia autem mea in aeternum manet. nos ergo agnoscamus uermem matutinum, quia et in illo psalmo, cuius titulus inscribitur: Pro susceptione matutina, hoc se ipse nomine appellare dignatus est: Ego, inquit, sum uermis et non homo, opprobrium hominum et abiectio plebis. hoc opprobrium de illis opprobriis est, quae iubemur non metuere per Esaiam dicentem: Opprobria hominum nolite metuere. ab isto uermi tamquam a tinea comeduntur, qui sub eius dente euangelico per singulos dies paucitatem suam deficiendo mirantur. nos hunc agnoscamus et pro salute diuina humana opprobria sufferamus. uermis est propter humilitatem carnis, fortassis etiam propter uirginis partum; nam hoc animal plerumque de carne uel de quaque re terrena sine ullo concubitu nascitur. matutinus est, quia diluculo resurrexit. poterat utique illa cucurbita et sine ullo uermiculo arescere. postremo si habebat deus ad hoc uermem necessarium, quid opus erat addere matutinum, nisi ut ille uermis agnosceretur, qui cantat pro susceptione matutina: Ego autem sum uermis et non homo?

### English translation (Claude)

Let the pagans laugh still, and with prouder chatter deride Christ as a worm and this interpretation of the prophetic mystery, provided he consumes them too, slowly and little by little. For Isaiah prophesies about all such, through whom God says to us: “Hear me, you who know judgment, my people, in whose heart is my law. Do not fear the reproaches of men, and do not be overcome by their slander, nor think it a great thing that they despise you. For like a garment they will be consumed in time, and like wool they will be eaten by the moth; but my righteousness remains for ever.” Let us, then, recognize the morning worm, for in that psalm whose title is inscribed “For the morning help”, he deigned to call himself by this name: “I am a worm,” he says, “and not a man, a reproach of men and despised by the people.” This reproach is one of those reproaches which we are commanded not to fear through Isaiah, saying: “Do not fear the reproaches of men.” By this worm, as by a moth, those are eaten who under his Gospel tooth marvel day by day at their fewness as they dwindle. Let us recognize him and for divine salvation endure human reproaches. He is a worm because of the lowliness of the flesh, perhaps also because of the virgin birth; for this animal is usually born from flesh or from some earthly thing without any mating. He is a morning worm because he rose at dawn. The gourd could surely have withered without any little worm. Finally, if God needed a worm for this, what need was there to add “morning”, except that that worm might be recognized who sings “for the morning help”: “But I am a worm and not a man”?

### Scripture references

- Isa 51:7: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 51:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:1 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jonah 4:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Isa 51:7–8; Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX), with the Old Latin psalm title (Ps 22:1 heading, 21:1 LXX “for the morning help”). The belief that worms are generated without mating is the natural science of the time, reported as given.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.36 (CSEL 34.2:575–576; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-36).

## Letter 102.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-37
- Source: CSEL 34.2:576–577
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Psalm 22's prophecy of the mocked worm and of the nations' conversion is fulfilled; other details of Jonah may be variously explained, but the three days must be read as Christ taught.

### Latin text

Quid ista prophetia iam ipso rerum effectu et adimpletione lucidius? neque enim si inrisus est uermis iste, cum penderet in cruce, sicut in eodem psalmo scriptum est: Locuti sunt labiis et mouerunt caput: Sperauit in deum, eruat eum; saluum faciat eum, quoniam uult eum), cum completa sunt, quae ibi praedixit: Foderunt manus meas et pedes, dinumerauerunt omnia ossa mea; ipsi uero considerauerunt et conspexerunt me, diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestem meam miserunt sortem, quod tanta manifestatione futurum in libro antiquo prophetatur, quanta manifestatione factum in nouo euangelio recitatur, — sed si in hac humilitate, ut dicere coeperam, iste uermis inrisus est, numquid adhuc inridendus est, cum ea compleri cernimus, quae consequentia psalmus ipse habet: Commemorabuntur et conuertentur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium, quoniam domini est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium? sic commemorati sunt Nineuitae et conuersi sunt ad dominum. hanc salutem paenitentiae gentium tanto ante praefiguratam in Iona dolebat Israhel, sicut nunc dolet umbra nudatus et aestu sauciatus. liceat sane cuilibet quamlibet aliter dum tamen secundum regulam fidei cetera omnia, quae de Iona propheta mysteriis operta sunt, aperire; illud plane, quod in uentre ceti triduo fuit, fas non est aliter intellegere, quam ab ipso caelesti magistro in euangelio commemorauimus reuelatum.

### English translation (Claude)

What is clearer than this prophecy, now that it is fulfilled in the very event? For if this worm was mocked when he hung on the cross, as is written in the same psalm, “They spoke with their lips and shook their heads: He hoped in God, let him rescue him; let him save him, since he delights in him”, when those things were fulfilled which he foretold there, “They pierced my hands and feet, they numbered all my bones; they looked and stared at me, they divided my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing”, which is prophesied in the ancient book as going to happen with as much clarity as it is read in the new Gospel as having happened; but if, as I had begun to say, this worm was mocked in this lowliness, is he still to be mocked, when we see fulfilled what the psalm itself contains next: “All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations shall worship before him, for the kingdom is the Lord's and he shall rule over the nations”? So the Ninevites remembered and turned to the Lord. This salvation through the repentance of the Gentiles, prefigured so long before in Jonah, Israel grieved over, as it now grieves, stripped of its shade and wounded by the heat. Let anyone indeed explain in any other way he likes, provided it is according to the rule of faith, all the other things about the prophet Jonah that are covered with mysteries; but that he was three days in the belly of the whale may not rightly be understood otherwise than as we have recalled it revealed in the Gospel by the heavenly Master himself.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:7 (21:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:8 (21:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:16 (21:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:17 (21:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:18 (21:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:28 (21:29 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 27:35: allusion, medium confidence
- Jonah 3:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 22:7–8, 16–18, 27–28 (21:8–9, 17–19, 28–29 LXX). References: Matt 27:35, 39; Jonah 3:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.37 (CSEL 34.2:576–577; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-37).

## Letter 102.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-38
- Source: CSEL 34.2:577–578
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the questioner to become a Christian now rather than wait until every question is settled, lest he die without faith.

### Latin text

Proposita exposuimus, ut potuimus; sed ille, qui proposuit, iam sit Christianus, ne forte, cum expectat ante librorum sanctorum finire quaestiones, prius finiat istam uitam, quam transeat a morte ad uitam. fieri enim potest, quod ante, quam Christianis sacramentis inbuatur, quaerit de resurrectione mortuorum; concedendum etiam fortassis, quod de Christo quaesiuit, cur tanto post uenerit uel si quae sunt aliae paucae et magnae quaestiones, quibus cetera inseruiunt. si autem qualis est illa: In qua mensura mensi fueritis. metietur uobis, uel qualis ista de Iona, etiam tales omnes ante, quam sit Christianus, finire cogitat, perparum cogitat uel condicionem humanam uel aetatem iam suam. sunt enim innumerabiles, quae non sunt finiendae ante fidem, ne finiatur uita sine fide, sed plane retenta iam fide ad exercendam piam delectationem mentium fidelium studiosissime requirendae et, quod in eis eluxerit, sine typho arrogantiae communicandum, quod autem latuerit, sine salutis dispendio tolerandum.

### English translation (Claude)

We have explained the questions put forward as best we could; but let him who put them now become a Christian, lest, while he waits first to settle the questions of the holy books, he end this life before he passes from death to life. For it is reasonable that, before being imbued with the Christian sacraments, he should ask about the resurrection of the dead; it may perhaps also be allowed that he asked about Christ, why he came so late, or if there are some other few and great questions which all the rest serve. But if he intends to settle all such questions as “With the measure you measure, it will be measured to you”, or this one about Jonah, before he becomes a Christian, he gives very little thought either to the human condition or to his own age. For there are countless questions which are not to be settled before faith, lest life end without faith; but once faith is held, they are to be investigated most zealously for the exercise of the devout delight of faithful minds; and what has become clear in them is to be shared without the conceit of arrogance, and what has remained hidden is to be borne without loss to salvation.

### Scripture references

- John 5:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: John 5:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 102.38 (CSEL 34.2:577–578; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-102-38).

## Letter 103.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:578–579
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius, a pagan of Calama, writing to Augustine, compares Augustine's letter to the eloquence of Cicero turned philosopher.

### Latin text

Sumptis litteris eximietatis tuae, quibus idolorum cultum et templorum caeremonias destruxisti, audire mihi uisus sum philosophi uocem non illius, quem in Academiae Lycio memorant tenebrosis humo angulis residentem, ex profunda quadam cogitatione demersum, reductis ad frontem caput implicitum genibus, ut aliorum praeclara inuenta doctrinae egenus quidam calumniator oppugnet adsertaque praeclare, cum suum nihil defendat, accuset, sed plane excitatus oratione tua ante oculos stetit M. Tullius consularis, qui innumeris ciuium capitibus conseruatis forensis campi signa uictricia stupentibus Graeciae scholis laureatus inferret tubamque illam canorae uocis et linguae, quam in criminum reos et rei publicae parricidas spiritu iustae indignationis flauerat anhelus, inuerteret togamque ipsam rugarum paginis resolutis palliorum imitatus speciem retorqueret.

### English translation (Claude)

On taking up your Excellency's letter, in which you demolished the worship of idols and the ceremonies of temples, I seemed to hear the voice of a philosopher; not of that one whom they record as sitting in the dark corners of the ground in the Lyceum of the Academy, sunk in some deep thought, his head wrapped up and drawn down to his knees, so that, poor in learning of his own, as a kind of slanderer he might attack the brilliant discoveries of others and accuse what was brilliantly asserted, while defending nothing of his own; but, plainly, roused by your speech, there stood before my eyes the consular Marcus Tullius, who, having saved the lives of countless citizens, crowned with laurel, carried the victorious standards of the forum into the astonished schools of Greece, and turned round that trumpet of his resonant voice and tongue, which he had blown breathlessly with the spirit of just indignation against criminals and parricides of the commonwealth, and, loosening the folds of his toga, twisted it back into the likeness of the philosopher's cloak.

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Nectarius, a pagan notable of Calama, to Augustine (409), pleading for his fellow citizens after a pagan riot in which the church at Calama was burned (June 408). Marcus Tullius is Cicero. The philosopher in the dark corners is evidently a sceptic of the Academy; the text's “Academiae Lycio” mixes the Academy and the Lyceum.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 103.1 (CSEL 34.2:578–579; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-1).

## Letter 103.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:579–580
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius welcomes Augustine's call to the heavenly city but argues that the earthly fatherland must not be deserted, since those who serve it are rewarded in heaven.

### Latin text

Ergo cum nos ad exsuperantissimi dei cultum religionemque compelleres, libenter audiui; quam caelestem patriam intuendam esse suaderes, gratanter accepi. non enim illam mihi ciuitatem dicere uidebare, quam muralis aliquis gyrus cohercet, nec illam, quam philosophorum tractatus mundanam memorans communem omnibus profitetur, sed quam magnus deus et uere meritae in ea animae habitant atque incolunt, quam omnes leges diuersis uiis et tramitibus appetunt, quam loquendo exprimere non possumus, cogitando forsitan inuenire possimus. haec ergo licet principaliter appetenda atque diligenda sit, tamen illam non arbitror deserendam, in qua nati et geniti sumus, quae prima nobis usum lucis huius infudit, quae aluit, quae educauit et, ut, quod ad causam proprie pertinet, dicam, de qua bene meritis uiris doctissimi homines ferunt post obitum corporis in caelo domicilium praeparari, ut promotio quaedam ad supernam praestetur his hominibus, qui bene de genitalibus urbibus meruerunt, et hi magis cum deo habitent, qui salutem dedisse aut consiliis aut operibus patriae doceantur. iam illud, quod ioculariter dignatus es dicere urbem nostram non armis sed flammis incendiisque flagrare et spinas magis ingenerare quam flores, non est maxima reprehensio, cum sciamus flores ex spinis plerumque generari. nam et rosas ex spinis gigni quis dubitat et fruges ipsas aristarum uallo sepiri? ita et asperis suauia plerumque miscentur.

### English translation (Claude)

So, when you urged us toward the worship and religion of the most exalted God, I heard it gladly; when you persuaded us to contemplate the heavenly fatherland, I received it with thanks. For you did not seem to me to speak of that city which some circuit of walls encloses, nor of that which philosophers' treatises, calling it the world-city, declare common to all, but of that in which the great God and souls that have truly deserved it dwell and live, which all laws seek by different ways and paths, which we cannot express in speaking but may perhaps find in thinking. Though this is to be sought and loved first of all, yet I do not think we should desert that city in which we were born and begotten, which first poured into us the enjoyment of this light, which nourished us, which brought us up, and, to say what properly belongs to the case, about which most learned men say that for men who have deserved well of it a dwelling is prepared in heaven after the death of the body, so that a kind of promotion to the city above is given to those men who have deserved well of the cities of their birth, and those dwell more with God who are shown to have brought safety to their fatherland by counsel or by deeds. As for what you deigned to say jestingly, that our city is burning not with arms but with flames and fires, and produces thorns rather than flowers, it is not the greatest reproach, since we know that flowers are very often produced from thorns. For who doubts that roses spring from thorns, and that the very crops are fenced with a palisade of beards? So sweet things are very often mixed with harsh.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Rep. 6.13 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The idea that those who served their fatherland have a dwelling prepared in heaven is from Cicero, Republic 6.13 (Dream of Scipio). “All laws seek it by different ways and paths” is Nectarius's own phrase, discussed by Augustine in Ep. 104.12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 103.2 (CSEL 34.2:579–580; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-2).

## Letter 103.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:580–581
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius argues that losing property is worse than death, and that, since repentance earns pardon and all sins are equal, his fellow citizens should be pardoned.

### Latin text

Postremum fuit in litteris praestantiae tuae non caput aut sanguinem in ecclesiae postulari uindicta, sed rebus quibus maxime metuunt spoliandos. ego autem, nisi me opinio fallit, sic arbitror grauius esse spoliari facultatibus quam occidi, si quidem, quod frequentatum in litteris nosti, mors malorum omnium auferat sensum, egestosa uita aeternam pariat calamitatem; grauius est enim male uiuere quam mala morte finire. hoc etiam operae uestrae indicat ratio, in quibus pauperes sustinetis, morbidos curatione releuatis, medicinam afflictis corporibus adhibetis, id postremo modis omnibus agitis, ut diuturnitatem calamitatis addicti non sentiant. quod autem ad modum pertinet peccatorum, nihil interest, quale uideatur esse peccatum, cui indulgentia postulatur. primum enim, si paenitentia et ueniam tribuit et purgat admissum, paenitet utique illum, qui rogat, qui pedes complectitur, et, si, ut quibusdam philosophis placet, omnia peccata paria sunt, indulgentia omnibus debet esse communis. petulantius locutus est aliquis, peccauit; conuicia aut crimina ingessit, aeque peccauit; aliena quisquam diripuit, inter delicta numeratur; loca profana sacraue uiolauit, non est ab indulgentia secernendus. postremo nullus esset ueniae locus, nisi peccata praecederent.

### English translation (Claude)

The last point in your Excellency's letter was that the vengeance of the church did not demand life or blood, but that they should be stripped of the things they most fear to lose. But I, unless I am mistaken, think it more grievous to be stripped of one's means than to be killed; since, as you know is often repeated in literature, death takes away the sense of all evils, while a life of want produces endless calamity; for it is more grievous to live in evils than to end evils by death. This is shown also by the character of your works, in which you support the poor, relieve the sick with care, apply medicine to afflicted bodies, and in short do everything in every way so that those consigned to it may not feel the length of their calamity. As to the measure of sins, it makes no difference what kind of sin it seems to be for which pardon is asked. First, if repentance both grants pardon and cleanses the offence, he who asks, who embraces your feet, certainly repents; and if, as some philosophers hold, all sins are equal, pardon ought to be common to all. Someone spoke insolently: he sinned. He heaped insults or accusations: he sinned equally. Someone plundered another's goods: it is counted among offences. He violated places profane or sacred: he is not to be excluded from pardon. Finally, there would be no room for pardon unless sins came first.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 51.20 (Sallust): allusion, medium confidence
- Cicero, Parad. 3 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Death takes away the sense of all evils” echoes Sallust, Catiline 51.20 (Caesar's speech); the equality of sins is the Stoic paradox (Cicero, Paradoxa Stoicorum 3). Nectarius is quoting Augustine's earlier letter (Ep. 91).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 103.3 (CSEL 34.2:580–581; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-3).

## Letter 103.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:581–582
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius pleads that Augustine consider the suffering of families if citizens are punished, and especially spare the innocent.

### Latin text

Nunc quoniam, non quantum debui, sed quantum potui, maius, ut dicitur, minusue respondi, oro atque obsecro — utinam praesentem possem, ut etiam lacrimas meas peruideres —, ut, qui sis, quid profitearis, quid agas, etiam atque etiam cogites, intendas, quae sit illius species ciuitatis, ex qua ad supplicium ducendi extrahuntur, quae sit matrum, quae coniugum, quae liberorum, quae parentum lamentatio, quo pudore ad patriam uenire possint liberati sed torti, quos renouet dolores aut gemitus consideratio uulnerum et cicatricum. et his omnibus pertractatis deum primo consideres hominumque cogites famam, bonitatem amicam potius familiaremque coniunctionem et ignoscendo potius laudem quam uindicando conquiras. atque haec de his dicta sint, quos uerus confessionis suae reatus astringit, quibus quidem legis contemplatione, quod laudare non desino, ueniam tribuisti. iam illud explicari uix potest, quantae crudelitatis sit innocentes appetere et eos, quos a crimine constat esse discretos, in iudicium capitis deuocare. quos si purgari contigerit, cogites, quaeso, quanta accusatorum liberabuntur inuidia, cum reos sponte dimiserint uicti, reliquerint innocentes. deus summus te custodiat et a legis suae conseruet praesidium atque ornamentum nostrum.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, since I have answered, not as much as I ought but as much as I could, more or less, as they say, I pray and beseech you (would that I were present, so that you might see my tears too) to consider again and again who you are, what you profess, what you do; to consider what the appearance of that city is from which men are dragged out to be led to punishment; what the lamentation of mothers, of wives, of children, of parents; with what shame those set free, but tortured, can come back to their fatherland; what sorrows and groans the sight of their wounds and scars renews. And having weighed all these things, consider God first and think of men's reputation, and seek rather friendly goodness and familiar union, and praise by pardoning rather than by punishing. And let this be said of those whom the real guilt of their confession binds, to whom indeed you have granted pardon out of regard for your law (that is, your religion), for which I do not cease to praise you. But it can hardly be expressed how great a cruelty it is to attack the innocent and to summon to a capital trial those who are clearly separate from the crime. If it happens that they are cleared, consider, I beg you, with how much ill will toward their accusers they will be set free, since the accusers released the guilty of their own accord and let the innocent go only when defeated. May the supreme God guard you and preserve you, the defence of his law and our ornament.

### Translation notes

- The closing words (“a legis suae conseruet”) are defective in the digital text and are translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 103.4 (CSEL 34.2:581–582; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/102-25/#p-103-4).

## Letter 104.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:582
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Nectarius's late reply, denying any wish that the citizens of Calama be tortured or executed, and asks what rumour prompted his fear.

### Latin text

Legi litteras benignitatis tuae, quibus mihi longe postea respondisti, quam meas ad te perferendas dedi. nam ego rescripseram, cum adhuc nobiscum esset neque nauigasset sanctus frater et coepiscopus meus Possidius; has autem, quas mei causa illi dignatus es reddere, accepi VI Kal. Aprilis post menses ferme octo, quam scripseram. cur ergo ad te tam sero mea scripta peruenerint aut ad me tua, prorsus ignoro, nisi forte modo rescribere prudentiae tuae placuerit, quod facere ante contempseras. hoc si ita est, miror, unde sit. an aliquid audisti, quod nos adhuc latet, fratrem meum Possidium aduersus ciues tuos, quos — pace tua dixerim — multo salubrius diligit ipse quam tu, quo plectantur seuerius, impetrasse? nam hoc et epistula tua te metuere indicat, cum admones, ut mihi ante oculos constituam, qualis illa sit species ciuitatis, ex qua ad supplicium ducendi extrahuntur, quae sit matrum, quae coniugum, quae liberorum, quae parentum lamentatio, quo pudore ad patriam uenire possint liberati sed torti, quos renouet dolores aut gemitus consideratio uulnerum et cicatricum. absit, ut, ista cuiquam inimicorum nostrorum uel per nos uel per quemquam quod ingerantur, instemus; sed, ut dixi, si aliquid tale ad te fama pertulit, apertius edissere, ut nouerimus, uel quid agere, ne ista fiant, uel quid haec credentibus respondere debeamus.

### English translation (Claude)

I have read your Benevolence's letter, in which you replied to me long after I had given mine to be delivered to you. For I had replied while my holy brother and fellow bishop Possidius was still with us and had not yet sailed; but this letter, which you were so kind as to give him for me, I received on the sixth day before the Kalends of April, about eight months after I had written. Why my letter reached you so late, or yours me, I do not know at all; unless perhaps your Prudence has decided to reply now, which you had previously disdained to do. If so, I wonder why. Have you heard something, which is still hidden from us, that my brother Possidius has obtained something against your fellow citizens, whom (by your leave) he loves much more wholesomely than you do, by which they may be punished more severely? For your letter shows that you fear this, when you urge me to set before my eyes what the appearance of that city is from which men are dragged out to be led to punishment, what the lamentation of mothers, wives, children, parents, with what shame those set free, but tortured, can come back to their fatherland, what sorrows and groans the sight of their wounds and scars renews. Far be it from us to press for these things to be inflicted on any of our enemies, either by us or by anyone else! But, as I said, if some such report has reached you, explain it more openly, so that we may know either what to do so that these things do not happen, or what we should answer those who believe them.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's reply to Ep. 103. The sixth day before the Kalends of April is 27 March (409). Possidius, bishop of Calama, had gone to the imperial court (see Ep. 95.1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.1 (CSEL 34.2:582; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-1).

## Letter 104.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:582–583
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Nectarius misreported his letter, and restates the argument Nectarius drew from it.

### Latin text

Litteras meas potius intuere, quibus te rescribere piguit: illic enim satis expressi animum nostrum. sed, ut opinor, oblitus, quid tibi rescripserim, omnino mihi alia longe diuersa et dissimilia rettulisti. quippe quasi recordatus, quod, in litteris meis posui, hoc tuis inseruisti, quod omnino non posui. postremum enim fuisse in litteris meis dicis non caput aut sanguinem in ecclesiae postulari uindicta, sed rebus quibus maxime metuunt spoliandos. deinde ostendens, quantum sit hoc mali, adiungis atque contexis, nisi te opinio fallit, arbitrari grauius esse spoliari facultatibus quam occidi. atque ut apertius exponas, de quibus facultatibus dixeris, peragis atque addis me frequentatum in litteris nosse, quod mors malorum omnium auferat sensum, egestosa autem uita aeternam pariat calamitatem. deinde conclusisti grauius esse in malis uiuere quam mala morte finire.

### English translation (Claude)

Look rather at my letter, to which you were reluctant to reply; for there I expressed my mind sufficiently. But, I think, having forgotten what I wrote to you, you have reported to me things altogether different and unlike. For, as if remembering what I put in my letter, you inserted in yours what I did not put at all. You say that the last point in my letter was “that the vengeance of the church did not demand life or blood, but that they should be stripped of the things they most fear to lose.” Then, showing how great an evil this is, you add and attach that, unless you are mistaken, you think it more grievous to be stripped of one's means than to be killed. And to explain more clearly what means you spoke of, you go on and add that I know it is often repeated in literature that “death takes away the sense of all evils, while a life of want produces endless calamity.” Then you concluded that it is more grievous to live in evils than to end evils by death.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.2 (CSEL 34.2:582–583; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-2).

## Letter 104.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:583–584
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Poverty is never a sin and cannot cause eternal misery; death ends evils only for the righteous, as the better philosophers and Scripture agree.

### Latin text

Et ego quidem nec in nostris, ad quas me serius fateor animum applicuisse, quam uellem, nec in uestris, quas ab ineunte aetate didici, litteris uspiam legisse recolo, quod egestosa uita aeternam pariat calamitatem. nam nec umquam peccatum est laboriosa paupertas et est aliquanta restrictio et cohercitio peccatorum. ac per hoc non est metuendum, ne cuiquam post hanc breuem uitam hoc ad aeternam ualeat animae calamitatem, quod pauper hic uixerit, et in hac ipsa, quam in terris degimus, nullo modo ulla calamitas aeterna esse poterit, cum eadem uita aeterna esse non possit, quae nec saltem diuturna est, ad quamlibet aetatem senectutemque peruenerit. hoc enim potius in illis litteris legi. quoniam uita ipsa, qua fruimur, breuis est, in qua tu arbitraris et frequentatum in litteris iam mones aeternam esse posse calamitatem; mortem autem malorum omnium esse finem habent quidem uestrae litterae sed nec ipsae omnes; Epicureorum est quippe ista sententia et si qui alii mortalem animam putant. at illi, quos Tullius quasi consulares philosophos appellat, quod eorum magni pendat auctoritatem, quoniam, cum extremum diem fungimur, non extingui animam sed emigrare censent, et ut merita quoque eius adserunt seu bona seu mala uel ad beatitudinem uel ad miseriam permanere. hoc congruit et litteris sacris, quarum me cupio litteratorem. malorum ergo finis est mors, sed in eis, quorum casta, pia, fidelis, innocens uita, non in eis, qui temporalium nugarum et uanitatum cupiditate flagrantes et, cum hic sibi felices uidentur, ipsa uoluntatis prauitate miseri conuincuntur et post mortem grauiores miserias non habere tantum uerum etiam sentire coguntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Now I do not remember ever having read, either in our literature, to which I confess I applied my mind later than I would have wished, or in yours, which I learned from my early youth, that a life of want produces endless calamity. For toilsome poverty is never a sin, and it is in some measure a restraint and check on sins. And so there is no need to fear that the fact that someone lived here in poverty will avail, after this short life, for the eternal calamity of his soul; and in this life which we spend on earth no calamity can in any way be eternal, since this life cannot be eternal, which is not even long, to whatever age and old age it may reach. This rather is what I have read in that literature: that this very life which we enjoy is short; and in it you think, and warn me that it is often repeated in literature, that there can be eternal calamity. That death is the end of all evils your literature does indeed contain, but not all of it; for that is the opinion of the Epicureans, and of any others who think the soul mortal. But those whom Tullius calls as it were the consular philosophers, because he values their authority highly, hold that when we die the soul is not extinguished but departs, and they assert that its deserts too, whether good or bad, remain for either happiness or misery. This agrees with the sacred writings too, of which I wish to be a scholar. Death, then, is the end of evils, but for those whose life has been chaste, pious, faithful and innocent; not for those who, burning with desire for temporal trifles and vanities, even when they seem happy here, are proved miserable by the very perversity of their will, and after death are compelled not only to have heavier miseries but also to feel them.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 1.55 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero's “consular philosophers” (Tusculan Disputations 1.55, of Plato and the Platonists) are contrasted with the Epicureans.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.3 (CSEL 34.2:583–584; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-3).

## Letter 104.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:584
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius should fear luxury, not poverty, for his people; Augustine never wished them reduced to want.

### Latin text

Haec ergo cum et uestris quibusdam, quas honorabilius habetis, et nostris omnibus litteris frequententur, o bone dilector etiam terrenae patriae tuae, luxuriosam uitam time ciuibus tuis, non egestosam aut, si egestosam times, illam potius egestatem mone deuitandam, quae magna licet rerum terrenarum prosperitate circumfluat, eis tamen insatiabiliter inhiando, ut uestrorum ipsorum uerbis utar auctorum, neque copia neque inopia minuitur. uerum tamen in illis, quibus respondisti, litteris meis inimicos ecclesiae ciues tuos nec illa egestate dixi emendandos, ubi necessaria naturae desunt, cui succurrit misericordia, de qua nobis etiam praescribendum putasti, quod operum nostrorum hoc indicet ratio, quibus pauperes sustinemus, morbidos curatione releuamus, medicinam afflictis corporibus adhibemus, quamquam et sic egere utilius sit quam ad satiandam nequitiam rebus omnibus abundare; sed absit, ut ego illa cohercitione ad hanc aerumnam eos, de quibus agimus, redigendos esse censuerim.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, these things are often repeated both in some of your literature, which you hold in greater honour, and in all of ours, O good lover even of your earthly fatherland, fear a luxurious life for your fellow citizens, not a needy one; or, if you fear a needy one, urge them rather to avoid that neediness which, though it overflows with great prosperity of earthly goods, yet, by gaping insatiably after them, to use the words of your own authors, “is lessened neither by plenty nor by want.” But in that letter of mine to which you replied I did not say that your fellow citizens, enemies of the church, should be corrected by that want in which the necessities of nature are lacking, which mercy relieves, about which you even thought you should prescribe to us, saying that this is shown by the character of our works, in which we support the poor, relieve the sick with care, and apply medicine to afflicted bodies; though even to be in want in that way is more useful than to abound in all things for the satisfying of wickedness. But far be it from me to have thought that those we are dealing with should be reduced to this hardship by that coercion.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 11.3 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quoted words are from Sallust, Catiline 11.3 (of avarice).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.4 (CSEL 34.2:584; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-4).

## Letter 104.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:584–586
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes his earlier letter: the offenders' lives and livelihood are to be spared, and only the wealth with which they live wickedly, which paid for idols and the burning of the church, may be taken.

### Latin text

Recense epistulam meam, si tamen dignam habuisti, si non quam relegeres, cum ei fuisset respondendum, saltem quam ita reponeres, ut tibi iubenti, cum uolueris, proferretur, et so adtende, quid dixerim; hoc profecto inuenies, cui te non respondisse, quantum existimo, fatearis. nam ex epistula illa mea uerba nunc insero: Non praeterita, inquam, uindicando pascere iram nostram studemus, sed misericorditer in futurum consulendo satagimus. habent homines mali, ubi et per Christianos non solum mansuete uerum etiam utiliter salubriterque plectantur; habent enim, quod corpore incolumes uiuunt, habent, unde uiuunt, habent, unde male uiuunt. duo prima salua sint, ut, quos paeniteat, sint; hoc optamus, hoc, quantum in nobis est, etiam inpensa opera instamus. tertium uero si dominus uoluerit tamquam putre noxiumque resecare, ualde misericorditer puniet. haec uerba mea si recensuisses, cum mihi rescribere dignareris, non solum de morte sed et de damnis corporalibus euitandis eorum, pro quibus agis, nos inuidiosius quam officiosius rogandos putares, quorum dixi uelle nos in eis saluum esse, quod incolumes corpore uiuunt, nec egestosam uitam, ut uictu indigeant ab aliis impartito, per nos eis utique formidares. quorum et illud secundum dixi uelle nos saluum, quod habent, unde uiuunt. tertium uero, quod habent, unde male uiuunt, id est, ut nihil aliud dicam, certe unde falsorum deorum argentea fabricauere simulacra, pro quibus uel seruandis uel adorandis uel sacrilego ritu adhuc colendis usque ad ecclesiae dei prosiliatur incendium et religiosissimorum pauperum sustentacula infelici uulgo diripienda praebeantur sanguisque fundendus, tu, qui tuae consulis ciuitati, quare metuis resecari, ne omni modo impunitate perniciosa nutriatur et roboretur audacia? hoc nobis edissere, hoc doce circumspecta disputatione quid mali sit; diligenter adtende, quod dicimus, ne id, quod uobis dicimus, uelut specie petendi quodam modo accusatione obliqua obicere uidearis.

### English translation (Claude)

Go over my letter again, if indeed you thought it worth, if not rereading when it had to be answered, at least putting away so that it could be produced when you ordered, whenever you wished; and note what I said: you will certainly find something which, as far as I can judge, you will admit you did not answer. For I now insert my words from that letter: “We are not eager,” I said, “to feed our anger by avenging the past, but we strive to provide mercifully for the future. Wicked men have things in which they may be punished by Christians too, not only gently but also usefully and wholesomely; for they have their bodily safety, they have the means to live, they have the means to live wickedly. Let the first two remain safe, so that there may be people to repent; this we desire, this, as far as in us lies, we press for with earnest effort. But the third, if the Lord wills to cut it off as something rotten and harmful, he will punish very mercifully.” If you had gone over these words of mine when you deigned to reply to me, you would have thought that we should be asked, more invidiously than dutifully, not only about avoiding death but also about avoiding bodily injury to those for whom you plead, since I said we wish their bodily safety preserved; nor would you have feared from us for them a life of want, so that they would need food given by others, since I said we wish the second thing preserved for them too, that they have the means to live. But the third, that they have the means to live wickedly: that is, to say nothing else, the means with which they made silver images of false gods, for the preserving, adoring or still worshipping of which with sacrilegious rite they rushed even to setting fire to the church of God, and the support of the most devout poor was handed over to the wretched mob to plunder, and blood was to be shed: why do you, who care for your city, fear that this should be cut off, lest harmful boldness be nourished and strengthened in every way by impunity? Explain this to us, teach us with careful argument what evil there is in this; attend carefully to what we say, lest what we say to you you seem to throw back at us, under the appearance of a petition, as a kind of oblique accusation.

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes his Ep. 91.9. The riot at Calama (June 408) is described as Augustine gives it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.5 (CSEL 34.2:584–586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-5).

## Letter 104.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:586
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine does not wish them reduced to the poverty of old Roman heroes, but only that fear for their superfluous wealth restrain them from further crimes.

### Latin text

Sint honesti ciues tui, probis moribus, non superfluis facultatibus; non eos uolumus ad aratrum Quintii et ad Fabricii focum per nos ulla cohercitione perduci, qua paupertate illi Romanae rei publicae principes non solum non uiluerunt ciuibus suis, sed ob eam fuerunt praecipue cariores et patriae gubernandis opibus aptiores. ne illud quidem optamus aut agimus, ut patriae tuae diuitibus illius Rufini bis consulis argenti cultus decem pondo remaneat, quod tunc laudabiliter seuera censura adhuc resecandum tamquam uitium iudicauit. tantum nos consuetudo decoloris aetatis nimium marcidas animas mitius contrectare persuadet, ut mansuetudini Christianae, quod illis censoribus iustum uisum est, nimium uideatur, et uides, quam multum intersit, utrum iam punienda culpa sit tantum habere an propter alias grauissimas culpas, ut tantum quis habeat, permittere. quod tunc iam fuit peccatum, nunc uolumus sit saltem poena peccati. sed est, quod fieri possit et debeat, ut nec usque ad ista progrediatur seueritas nec nimis secura laetetur et debacchetur impunitas et imitationis exemplum ad grauissimas et occultissimas poenas infelicibus proponatur. saltem concede, ut nimium superfluis suis timeant, qui necessaria nostra incendere ac uastare moliuntur. liceat et hoc beneficium tribuere inimicis nostris, ut, dum metuunt rebus, quas noxium non est amittere, quod sibi noxium est, non conentur admittere. neque enim haec dicenda est uindicta peccati sed tutela consilii; non est hoc inrogare supplicium sed ab excipiendo supplicio communire.

### English translation (Claude)

Let your fellow citizens be honourable by good conduct, not by superfluous wealth. We do not wish them to be brought by any coercion of ours to the plough of Quinctius and the hearth of Fabricius, the poverty by which those leaders of the Roman commonwealth were not only not cheapened in the eyes of their fellow citizens but were for that very reason especially dearer to them and fitter to govern the resources of the fatherland. We do not even wish or work for this: that to the rich of your fatherland there should remain only the ten pounds of silver plate of that Rufinus, twice consul, which the then praiseworthily severe censorship judged should be cut off as a vice. So far does the custom of a degenerate age persuade us to handle too languid souls more gently, that to Christian gentleness what seemed just to those censors seems too much; and you see how great a difference it makes whether merely having so much is already a fault to be punished, or whether, because of other very grave faults, one is permitted to have so much. What was then already a sin, we now wish to be at least the penalty of sin. But there is something that can and should be done, so that severity does not go so far, and impunity does not rejoice too securely and run riot, and an example for imitation, leading to the gravest and most hidden punishments, is not set before the unhappy. At least allow those who try to burn and lay waste our necessities to fear for their superfluities. Let us be allowed to give our enemies this benefit too: that, while they fear for things which it is not harmful to lose, they may not attempt to commit what is harmful to them. For this should not be called vengeance for sin but a protection by counsel; this is not inflicting punishment but guarding against incurring punishment.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Livy, Per. 14 (Livy, History of Rome): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quinctius Cincinnatus and Fabricius were heroes of early Roman frugality; Publius Cornelius Rufinus, twice consul, was expelled from the senate by the censor in 275 BC for owning ten pounds of silver plate (Livy, Periochae 14; Valerius Maximus 2.9.4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.6 (CSEL 34.2:586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-6).

## Letter 104.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:586–587
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love sometimes withholds what is asked, as one keeps a sword from a child or pulls a boy away from snakes; a good ruler serves the people's good, not their wishes.

### Latin text

Quisquis inprudentem cum aliquo sensu doloris priuat. ne superuacuis sceleribus adsuefactus poenas atrocissimas pendat, puero capillos uellit, ne serpentibus plaudat, atque ita, ubi molesta dilectio est, nullum membrum laeditur, unde autem deterret, salus et uita periclitatur. non tunc benefici sumus, cum id, quod a nobis petitur, facimus, sed cum id facimus, quod non obsit petentibus. nam pleraque non dando prosumus et noceremus, si dedissemus. unde illud prouerbium: Nec puero gladium. Tu uero, inquit Tullius, ne unico quidem filio. quo enim quemquam maxime diligimus, eo minus ei debemus, in quibus magno periculo peccatur, committere. et de diuitiis, ni fallor, cum haec ageret, loquebatur. proinde quae periculose male utentibus committuntur, salubriter etiam plerumque detrahuntur. medici cum uident secandam urendamque putredinem, saepe aduersus multas lacrimas misericorditer obsurdescunt. si, quotiens paruuli uel etiam grandiusculi ueniam peccantes deprecati sumus, totiens a parentibus uel magistris accepissemus, quis nostrum tolerandus creuisset? quis aliquid utile didicisset? prouidenter ista, non crudeliter fiunt. ne, quaeso, in hac causa nihil aliud intendas, nisi quem ad modum apud nos efficias, quod rogaris a tuis; omnia uero diligenter considera. si praeterita neglegis, quae fieri iam infecta non possunt, aliquantum prospice in posterum; non quid cupiant, qui te rogant, sed quid eis expediat, prudenter adtende. non sane fideliter eos amare conuincimur, si hoc solum intuemur, ne non faciendo, quod poscunt, minuatur, quod amamur ab eis; et ubi est, quod et uestrae litterae illum laudant patriae rectorem, qui populi utilitati magis consulat quam uoluntati?

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever, with some feeling of pain, deprives a heedless person [of something dangerous], so that, grown used to needless crimes, he may not pay the most atrocious penalties, is like one who pulls a boy's hair so that he will not clap his hands at snakes: so where love is troublesome, no limb is harmed, but where it deters, health and life are in danger. We are not beneficent when we do what is asked of us, but when we do what does not harm those who ask. For we often help by not giving, and would harm if we had given. Hence that proverb: “Not even a sword to a boy.” “But you,” says Tullius, “not even to an only son.” For the more we love someone, the less we ought to entrust to him things in which there is great danger of sinning. And, if I am not mistaken, he was speaking of riches when he said this. Therefore what is entrusted dangerously to those who use it badly is very often also withdrawn wholesomely. Physicians, when they see that a rotten part must be cut and burned, often mercifully turn a deaf ear to many tears. If, every time we begged pardon for our faults as small children, or even as somewhat older ones, we had received it from parents or teachers, which of us would have grown up bearable? Which of us would have learned anything useful? These things are done with foresight, not with cruelty. Do not, I beg you, in this case aim at nothing but how to obtain from us what your people ask of you; consider everything carefully. If you neglect the past, which cannot now be undone, look a little to the future; consider prudently not what those who ask you desire, but what is good for them. We are certainly shown not to love them faithfully if we look only to this, that our being loved by them should not be lessened by our not doing what they demand. And where is it that your literature too praises that ruler of the fatherland who consults the people's advantage rather than its wishes?

### Translation notes

- The opening sentence is defective in the digital text; the words in brackets are supplied by sense. The words of “Tullius” (Cicero) are not identified in his surviving works. The praise of the ruler who consults the people's good is a commonplace of Roman political writing (compare Cicero, On Duties 1.85).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.7 (CSEL 34.2:586–587; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-7).

## Letter 104.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:587–588
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A Christian forgives readily and never seeks vengeance, but forgiveness does not exclude restraining and correcting.

### Latin text

Nihil interest, inquis, quale uideatur esse peccatum, cum indulgentia postulatur. recte hoc diceres, si de puniendis, non de corrigendis hominibus ageretur. absit enim a corde Christiano, ut libidine ulciscendi ad poenam cuiusque rapiatur; absit, ut in dimittendo cuique peccatum aut non praeueniat preces rogantis aut certe continuo subsequatur, sed hoc utique ne oderit hominem, ne malum pro malo retribuat, ne nocendi inflammetur ardore, ne uindicta etiam lege debita pasci desideret, non autem ne consulat, ne prospiciat, ne compescat a malis. fieri enim potest, ut uehementius aduersando emendationem quisque neglegat hominis, quem grauius odit, et nonnulla molestia reddat cohercendo meliorem, quem maxime diligit.

### English translation (Claude)

“It makes no difference,” you say, “what kind of sin it seems to be, when pardon is asked.” You would say this rightly if it were a question of punishing men, not of correcting them. For far be it from a Christian heart to be carried away by lust for vengeance to anyone's punishment; far be it that, in forgiving anyone's sin, it should not either anticipate the prayers of the one asking or at least follow them at once; but this, surely, so that it may not hate the man, may not repay evil for evil, may not be inflamed with eagerness to harm, may not desire to feed on vengeance even when it is due by law; not so that it may not take thought, not provide for the future, not restrain from evils. For it can happen that by more vehement opposition one neglects the correction of a man whom one hates more gravely, and by some trouble, in restraining him, makes better one whom one loves most.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 12:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.8 (CSEL 34.2:587–588; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-8).

## Letter 104.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:588–589
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: True repentance looks to God's judgment; Christians involved in the riot were reconciled by penance, but pagans who mock the faith are restrained for their own good, and Augustine prays for their conversion.

### Latin text

Nam et paenitentia, sicut scribis, impetrat ueniam et purgat admissum sed illa, quae in uera religione agitur, quae futurum iudicium dei cogitat, non illa, quae ad horam hominibus aut exhibetur aut fingitur, non ut a delicto anima purgetur in aeternum, sed ut interim a praesenti metu molestiae uita cito peritura liberetur. hinc est, quod Christianis confitentibus atque deprecantibus, qui delicto illo fuerant implicati uel non succurrendo arsurae ecclesiae uel de sceleratissimis rapinis aliquid auferendo, paenitentiae dolorem fructuosum esse credidimus eisque ad correctionem sufficere existimauimus, quod inest cordibus eorum fides, qua considerare possent, quid de diuino iudicio formidare deberent. quae autem paenitentia sanare potest eos, qui fontem ipsum indulgentiae non solum agnoscere neglegunt, uerum etiam inridere ac blasphemare non desinunt? et contra hos tamen inimicitias in corde non retinemus, quod illi patet ac nudum est, cuius et in praesenti et in futura uita et timemus iudicium et speramus auxilium. sed arbitramur nos etiam pro ipsis aliquid prouidere, si homines, qui deum non timent, aliquid timeant, quo non eorum laedatur utilitas, sed uanitas castigetur, ne ab eis deus ipse, quem spernunt, noxia securitate audacioribus factis grauius offendatur et ne aliis ad imitandum eadem ipsa securitas multo perniciosius proponatur. denique pro quibus abs te rogamur, nos pro illis deum rogamus, uti eos ad se conuertat, ut fide mundans corda eorum ueracem ac salubrem agere paenitentiam doceat.

### English translation (Claude)

For repentance too, as you write, obtains pardon and cleanses the offence; but that repentance which is practised in the true religion, which considers the future judgment of God; not that which is shown or feigned before men for the moment, not so that the soul may be cleansed from the offence for ever, but so that a life soon to perish may meanwhile be freed from the present fear of trouble. That is why, in the case of Christians who confessed and begged pardon, who had been involved in that offence either by not helping the church as it burned or by taking something from the most wicked plunder, we believed the pain of repentance to be fruitful, and judged it sufficient for their correction that there is faith in their hearts, by which they could consider what they ought to fear from the divine judgment. But what repentance can heal those who not only neglect to acknowledge the very fountain of pardon but do not cease to mock and blaspheme it? And yet even against these we do not keep enmity in our heart, which lies open and bare to him whose judgment we fear and whose help we hope for, both in the present and in the future life. But we think we are providing something for them too, if men who do not fear God fear something, by which not their advantage is harmed but their vanity is chastised, lest God himself, whom they despise, be more gravely offended by them through bolder deeds born of harmful security, and lest that very security be set before others to imitate with much more ruinous effect. Finally, for those for whom you ask us, we ask God that he may turn them to himself, and, cleansing their hearts by faith, teach them to practise a true and wholesome repentance.

### Scripture references

- Acts 15:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Acts 15:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.9 (CSEL 34.2:588–589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-9).

## Letter 104.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:589
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine claims to love Nectarius's fellow citizens better than he does, and urges him to lead them himself toward true religion.

### Latin text

Ecce quanto eos, quibus nos arbitraris irasci, — pace tua dixerim — ordinatius quam tu utiliusque diligimus, pro quibus et ad euitanda tanto maiora mala et ad consequenda tanto maiora bona deprecamur. quos etiam tu si ex dei caelesti munere non ex hominum terreno more diligeres sinceriterque mihi rescriberes, quod, cum te ad exsuperantissimi dei cultum religionemque compellerem, libenter audieris, non solum haec eis optares, sed eis ad haec ipse praeires. sic omne apud nos tuae petitionis negotium cum magno et sano gaudio finiretur; sic illam caelestem patriam, quam cum intuendam esse suaderem, libens te accepisse dixisti, ex huius etiam, quae te carnaliter genuit, uera et pia dilectione promereris uere consulens tuis non ad uanitatem laetitiae temporalis nec ad impunitatem perniciosissimam sceleris sed ad gratiam sempiternae felicitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

See how much more rightly and usefully than you (by your leave) we love those with whom you think we are angry, praying for them both to avoid evils so much greater and to obtain goods so much greater. If you too loved them from God's heavenly gift and not by the earthly custom of men, and wrote to me sincerely that you heard gladly when I urged you toward the worship and religion of the most exalted God, you would not only wish these things for them but would go before them yourself toward these things. Thus the whole business of your petition would be concluded with us with great and sound joy; thus you would earn that heavenly fatherland, which you said you gladly received when I urged that it be contemplated, by a true and godly love for this one too, which begot you in the flesh, truly caring for your people, not for the vanity of temporal joy nor for the most ruinous impunity of crime, but for the grace of everlasting happiness.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.10 (CSEL 34.2:589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-10).

## Letter 104.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:589–590
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's counsel about Calama is unknown; better to turn now to Christ, who alone truly fulfils Virgil's words about wiping away the traces of crime.

### Latin text

Habes expositas in hac causa cogitationes et uota pectoris mei. quid autem lateat in consilio dei, fateor, homo sum, nescio; sed certissime scio, quicquid illud est, id esse iustius atque sapientius et firmissime stabilitum incomparabili excellentia prae omnibus mentibus hominum. uerum est quippe, quod legitur in libris nostris: Multae cogitationes sunt in corde uiri, consilium autem domini manet in aeternum. proinde quid tempus adferat, quid nobis facultatis aut difficultatis oriatur, quid postremo uoluntatis ex rerum praesentium uel correctione uel spe subito possit existere, utrum deus sic indignetur his factis, ut ea, quam petunt, impunitate magis seueriusque puniantur, an illo modo, quo nobis placet, cohercendos misericorditer iudicet, an aliqua acriore sed salubriore eorum praecedente correctione nec ad hominum sed ad suam misericordiam ueraci conuersione, quicquid terroris praeparabatur, auertat et conuertat in gaudium, iam nouit ipse, nos autem ignoramus. quid ergo hic ante tempus inter nos ego et praestantia tua frustra laboremus? seponamus paululum curam, cuius hora non est, et quod semper instat, si placet, agamus. nullum enim tempus est, quo non deceat et oporteat agere, unde deo placere possimus; quod in hac uita usque ad eam perfectionem impleri, ut nullum omnino peccatum insit in homine, aut non potest aut forte difficillimum est. inde praecisis omnibus dilationibus ad illius gratiam confugiendum est, cui uerissime dici potest, quod carmine adulatorio nescio cui nobili dixit, qui tamen ex Cumaeo tamquam ex prophetico carmine se accepisse confessus est: Te duce, si qua manent sceleris uestigia nostri, inrita perpetua soluent formidine terras. hoc enim duce solutis omnibus dimissisque peccatis hac uia ad caelestem patriam peruenitur, cuius habitatione cum eam tibi amandam, quantum potui, commendarem, admodum delectatus es.

### English translation (Claude)

You have here set out the thoughts and wishes of my heart in this case. But what lies hidden in the counsel of God I confess I do not know, being a man; but I know most certainly that, whatever it is, it is more just and wise and most firmly established, with incomparable excellence, above all the minds of men. For what is read in our books is true: “Many are the thoughts in a man's heart, but the counsel of the Lord remains for ever.” So what time may bring, what possibility or difficulty may arise for us, finally what will may suddenly spring from either the correction or the hope of present things; whether God is so angered by these deeds that they will be punished more and more severely by the very impunity they seek, or will judge that they should be mercifully restrained in the way we prefer, or, through some sharper but more wholesome correction of theirs going before, and through a true conversion, not to the mercy of men but to his own, will turn away whatever terror was being prepared and turn it into joy: this he knows, but we do not know. Why then should your Excellency and I labour in vain over this between us before the time? Let us set aside for a little the concern whose hour has not come, and, if you please, let us do what is always pressing. For there is no time when it is not fitting and necessary to do what may please God; which in this life either cannot be fulfilled to that perfection in which there is no sin at all in a man, or perhaps is very difficult. So, cutting off all delays, we must flee to the grace of him to whom can most truly be said what someone said in a flattering poem to some nobleman or other, though he confessed that he had taken it from a Cumaean, as it were prophetic, song: “Under your leadership, any traces of our crime that remain, made void, will free the lands from perpetual fear.” For under this leader, all sins loosed and forgiven, one comes by this way to the heavenly fatherland, in whose dwelling you were so much delighted when I commended it to your love as well as I could.

### Scripture references

- Prov 19:21: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Ecl. 4.13 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Prov 19:21; Virgil, Eclogue 4.13–14 (the poem claims to follow the Cumaean Sibyl's song).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.11 (CSEL 34.2:589–590; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-11).

## Letter 104.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:590–591
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius's word “seek” rightly implies that many religions seek the heavenly city but only one way reaches it, though Scripture speaks of many ways that are one.

### Latin text

Sed quia dixisti, quod omnes eam leges diuersis uiis et tramitibus appetant, uereor, ne forte, cum putas etiam illam uiam, in qua nunc constitutus es, eo tendere, pigrior sis ad eam tenendam, quae illuc sola perducit. sed rursus uerbum, quod posuisti, diligenter adtendens uideor mihi tuam non inprudenter aperire sententiam. neque enim dixisti, quam omnes leges diuersis uiis et tramitibus adsequuntur aut ostendunt aut inueniunt aut ingrediuntur aut obtinent aut aliquid eius modi, sed dicendo appetunt librato uerbo atque perpenso non adeptionem significasti sed adipiscendi cupiditatem. ita nec illam, quae uera est, exclusisti nec alias, quae falsae sunt, admisisti; et illa quippe appetit, quae perducit, nec perducit omnis, quae hoc appetit. quo quisquis perducitur, sine ulla dubitatione beatus est; beati autem omnes esse uolumus, hoc est appetimus nec tamen omnes, qui uolumus, possumus, hoc est, quod appetimus, adipiscimur. ille ergo adipiscitur, qui uiam tenet non solum, qua id appetit, sed qua etiam peruenitur, relinquens alios in itineribus appetendi sine fine adipiscendi, quoniam nec error esset, si nihil appeteretur nec si appetita ueritas teneretur. si uero diuersas uias ita dixisti, ut non intellegamus aduersas, sicut dicimus diuersa praecepta, quae tamen omnia bonam aedificent uitam alia de castitate alia de patientia alia de fide alia de misericordia et si qua sunt cetera, non solum appetitur uiis et tramitibus ita diuersis illa patria, uerum etiam reperitur. nam et in scripturis sanctis et uiae leguntur et uia: uiae, sicut illud est: Docebo iniquos uias tuas et impii ad te conuertentur, uia, sicut illud: Deduc me in uia tua et ambulabo in ueritate tua, non aliae illae alia ista sed omnes una, de quibus alio loco eadem sancta scriptura dicit: Uniuersae uiae domini misericordia et ueritas. quae si diligenter considerentur, copiosum pariunt sermonem intellectumque suauissimum; quod si opus fuerit, in tempus aliud differam.

### English translation (Claude)

But since you said that all laws seek it by different ways and paths, I fear that, thinking that the way on which you are now set also leads there, you may be slower to hold the one way that alone leads there. But again, paying careful attention to the word you used, I seem not unwisely to discern your meaning. For you did not say that all laws by different ways and paths attain it, or show it, or find it, or enter it, or obtain it, or anything of that kind; but by saying “seek”, with a weighed and balanced word, you signified not the attainment but the desire to attain. So you neither excluded the one that is true nor admitted the others that are false; for the one that leads there also seeks it, but not every one that seeks it leads there. Whoever is led there is without any doubt happy; and we all wish to be happy, that is, we seek it; yet not all of us who wish are able, that is, attain what we seek. He attains, then, who holds the way not only by which he seeks it but by which one also arrives, leaving others on the roads of seeking without the end of attaining; for there would be no error if nothing were sought, nor if the truth sought were held. But if you spoke of different ways in such a sense that we do not understand opposed ways, as we speak of different precepts which nevertheless all build up a good life, some about chastity, some about patience, some about faith, some about mercy, and whatever others there are, then that fatherland is not only sought by ways and paths so different, but also found. For in the holy Scriptures both “ways” and “the way” are read: “ways”, as in this, “I will teach the unjust your ways, and the ungodly will turn to you”; “the way”, as in this, “Lead me in your way, and I will walk in your truth”; not those ways being other and this way another, but all one, of which the same holy Scripture says in another place: “All the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth.” If these are considered carefully, they produce a copious discourse and a most delightful understanding; if it is necessary, I will put it off to another time.

### Scripture references

- Ps 51:13 (50:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 86:11 (85:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 51:13 (50:15 LXX); Ps 86:11 (85:11 LXX); Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX). Nectarius's phrase is from Ep. 103.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.12 (CSEL 34.2:590–591; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-12).

## Letter 104.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:591–592
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ is the way to mercy and truth; the Stoic doctrine that all sins are equal is absurd, equating a laugh with burning one's city.

### Latin text

Nunc autem, quod satis esse arbitror pro suscepto officio rescribendi praestantiae tuae, quoniam Christus dixit: Ego sum uia, in illo quaerenda est misericordia et ueritas, ne, si alibi quaesierimus, erremus tenentes appetentem uiam sed non etiam perducentem, uelut, si hanc ipsam tenere uellemus, unde quiddam commemorasti, omnia peccata esse paria, nonne ab illa patria ueritatis et beatitatis nos longe exules mitteret? quid enim absurdius, quid insanius dici potest, quam ut ille, qui aliquanto inmoderatius riserit, et ille, qui patriam truculentius incenderit, peccasse iudicentur aequaliter? quam quidem tu ei quorundam philosophorum opinione non diuersam uiam, quae tamen ducat ad caelestem habitationem, sed plane peruersam, quae ducit ad perniciosissimum errorem, non pro tuo sensu sed pro causa ciuium tuorum adhibendam putasti, ut sic ignoscamus eis, quorum saeuientium ignibus arsit ecclesia, quem ad modum ignosceremus, si ab eis aliquo petulanti conuicio appeteremur.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, however, which I think is enough for the duty I have undertaken of replying to your Excellency, since Christ said, “I am the way”, mercy and truth must be sought in him, lest, if we seek them elsewhere, we go astray, holding a way that seeks but does not also lead; as, if we wished to hold that very one from which you mentioned something, that all sins are equal, would it not send us far into exile from that fatherland of truth and blessedness? For what can be said more absurd, more insane, than that he who laughed somewhat immoderately and he who savagely set fire to his fatherland should be judged to have sinned equally? This opinion of certain philosophers, not a different way that nevertheless leads to the heavenly dwelling, but a plainly perverse one that leads to most ruinous error, you thought should be brought in, not according to your own view but for the cause of your fellow citizens, so that we might pardon those by whose raging fires the church burned, as we would pardon them if we were attacked by them with some insolent abuse.

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Parad. 3 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 14:6. The Stoic paradox: Cicero, Paradoxa Stoicorum 3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.13 (CSEL 34.2:591–592; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-13).

## Letter 104.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:592
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nectarius asserts but does not prove that all sins are equal; on that logic mice would equal elephants.

### Latin text

Sed quem ad modum id adstruxeris, uide: Et si, ut quibusdam, inquis, philosophis placet, omnia peccata paria sunt, indulgentia omnibus debet esse communis. deinde cum quasi moliris ostendere omnia paria esse peccata, subiungis et dicis: Petulantius locutus est aliquis, peccauit; conuicia aut crimina ingessit, aeque peccauit. hoc non est docere sed id, quod peruerse sentitur, sine ulla documentorum adstructione proponere. ad hoc enim, quod dicis aeque peccauit, cito respondetur: non aeque peccauit. exigis fortassis, ut probem: quid enim tu, quod aeque peccauerit, iam probasti? an illud, quod iungis, audiendum est: Aliena quisque diripuit, inter delicta numeratur? hic etiam tu ipse uerecundatus es; puduit enim te dicere, quod peccauit aequaliter, sed inter delicta, inquis, numeratur. non autem ibi quaestio est, utrum et hoc inter delicta numeretur, sed utrum hoc illi delicto aequalitate iungatur, aut, si propterea sunt paria, quia utraque delicta sunt, mures et elephanti pares erunt, quia utraque sunt animalia, muscae et aquilae, quia utraque uolatilia.

### English translation (Claude)

But see how you built it up: “And if, as some philosophers hold,” you say, “all sins are equal, pardon ought to be common to all.” Then, as if trying to show that all sins are equal, you add and say: “Someone spoke insolently: he sinned. He heaped insults or accusations: he sinned equally.” This is not teaching but putting forward, without any support of proofs, what is perversely thought. For to your “he sinned equally” the answer is quick: he did not sin equally. Perhaps you demand that I prove it; but what have you proved, that he sinned equally? Or should we listen to what you add: “Someone plundered another's goods: it is counted among offences”? Here even you yourself were ashamed; for you were embarrassed to say that he sinned equally, but you say, “it is counted among offences.” But the question there is not whether this too is counted among offences, but whether it is joined to that offence in equality; or, if they are equal because both are offences, mice and elephants will be equal because both are animals, flies and eagles because both are winged creatures.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.14 (CSEL 34.2:592; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-14).

## Letter 104.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:592–593
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even Nectarius did not equate burning the church with insolent words; mercy is owed to the penitent, and he should not teach his son Paradoxus Stoic paradoxes.

### Latin text

Adhuc etiam progrederis et coniectas: Loca profana sacraue uiolauit, non est ab indulgentia secernendus. hic sane de uiolatis sacris locis ad facinus tuorum ciuium peruenisti, uerum locutioni petulanti nec tu ipse coaequasti; tantum modo eis petisti indulgentiam, quae recte petitur a Christianis propter abundantem miserationem non propter peccatorum parilitatem. ego autem supra posui scriptum in litteris nostris: Uniuersae uiae domini misericordia et ueritas. consequentur itaque misericordiam, si non oderint ueritatem. quae non quasi aeque peccantibus, ac si petulantius locuti sint, sed de scelere immanissimo atque impio recte paenitentibus Christiano iure debetur. tu uero, uir merito laudabilis, ne, quaeso, ista paradoxa Stoicorum sectanda doceas Paradoxum tuum, quem tibi optamus uera pietate ac felicitate grandescere. nam quid generosus adulescens sapere iniquius et tibi ipsi periculosius potest, quam si conuicio in quemlibet extraneum iaculato non dico parricidium sed ipsum in patrem conuicium coaequauerit?

### English translation (Claude)

You go further still and throw in: “He violated places profane or sacred: he is not to be excluded from pardon.” Here indeed, with the violation of sacred places, you have come to the crime of your fellow citizens, yet even you did not make it equal to insolent speech; you only asked pardon for them, which is rightly asked of Christians because of their abundant compassion, not because of the equality of sins. I put above what is written in our literature: “All the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth.” They will obtain mercy, then, if they do not hate truth. That mercy is owed by Christian right, not to those as if they had sinned equally, as though they had spoken insolently, but to those who rightly repent of a most monstrous and ungodly crime. But you, deservedly praiseworthy man, do not, I beg you, teach these paradoxes of the Stoics to be followed by your Paradoxus, whom we wish to grow up for you in true piety and happiness. For what could a noble young man think more unjust, and more dangerous to yourself, than if he made, I do not say parricide, but insult against his father equal to an insult hurled at any stranger?

### Scripture references

- Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX). Paradoxus was Nectarius's son or grandson (the name invites the pun on the Stoic “paradoxes”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.15 (CSEL 34.2:592–593; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-15).

## Letter 104.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:593–594
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Stoic hardness condemns the mercy Nectarius asks for; Cicero praised Caesar's mercy, and Christians practise mercy with truth, which sometimes means restraint.

### Latin text

Conuenienter itaque apud nos pro ciuibus tuis agis ingerendo nobis misericordiam Christianorum non duritiam Stoicorum, quae causae a te susceptae non modo nihil suffragatur, uerum etiam multum aduersatur. nam ipsam misericordiam, quam si non habeamus, nulla tua petitione, nullis illorum precibus flecti poterimus, in uitio Stoici ponunt eamque a sapientis animo penitus expellunt, quem prorsus ferreum et inflexibilem uolunt. melius itaque tibi occurreret, de tuo Cicerone quod diceres, qui Caesarem laudans: Nulla, inquit, de uirtutibus tuis admirabilior uel gratior misericordia est. quanto magis debet ea in ecclesiis praeualere, quando eum sequuntur, qui dixit: Ego sum uia, et legunt: Uniuersae uiae domini misericordia et ueritas. noli ergo metuere, innocentibus ne moliamur exitium, qui nec nocentes uolumus ad dignum supplicium peruenire prohibente nos illa misericordia, quam in Christo cum ueritate diligimus. sed qui uitiis nutriendis parcit et fouet, ne contristet peccantium uoluntatem, tam non est misericors, quam qui non uult cultrum rapere puero, ne audiat plorantem, et non timet, ne uulneratum doleat uel extinctum. serua ergo tempori opportuno, quod apud nos agas pro his hominibus, in quorum dilectione — da ueniam — non solum nos minime praecedis, sed nec adhuc sequeris, et rescribe potius, quid te de hac uia moueat, quam tenemus et in qua nobiscum ad supernam patriam, qua te delectari nouimus et gaudemus, ut gradiaris, instamus.

### English translation (Claude)

It is fitting, then, that you plead with us for your fellow citizens by pressing on us the mercy of Christians, not the hardness of the Stoics, which not only does nothing for the cause you have taken up but even works greatly against it. For the Stoics count that very mercy, without which no petition of yours and no prayers of theirs could move us, as a vice, and drive it out entirely from the mind of the wise man, whom they want to be wholly iron and inflexible. It would have been better, then, to recall what you could quote from your Cicero, who, praising Caesar, says: “Of your virtues none is more admirable or more pleasing than mercy.” How much more ought it to prevail in the churches, since they follow him who said, “I am the way”, and read, “All the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth”! Do not fear, then, that we are plotting destruction for the innocent, we who do not wish even the guilty to come to the punishment they deserve, forbidden by that mercy which we love in Christ together with truth. But he who spares and fosters vices in order not to sadden the will of sinners is as little merciful as one who will not snatch a knife from a child so as not to hear him cry, and does not fear that he may grieve over him wounded or dead. Keep for a suitable time, then, what you would do with us for these men, in love for whom (pardon me) you not only do not go before us at all but do not even follow us yet; and write back instead what troubles you about this way which we hold and in which we urge you to walk with us to the heavenly fatherland in which, we know and rejoice, you take delight.

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Lig. 37 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Cicero, For Ligarius 37. Quotations: John 14:6; Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.16 (CSEL 34.2:593–594; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-16).

## Letter 104.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:594–595
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine was not joking about Calama's thorns while the church still smokes; he distinguished degrees of guilt and refused torture, unlike the Stoics, who would punish all equally.

### Latin text

Ciues autem carnalis patriae tuae etsi non omnes sed quosdam innocentes quidem dixisti, uerum tamen, quod relecta illa epistula mea debes aduertere, non defendisti. quorum non flores sed spinas nos sensisse cum dicerem respondens ad illud, quod scripseras florentem te cupere patriam relinquere, iocari me putasti. hoc scilicet in malis tantis libeat! ita est prorsus! fumant adhuc ruinae incensae ecclesiae et in ea causa nos iocamur! et ego quidem, quamuis innocentes illic mihi non occurrerent, nisi qui aut absentes fuerunt aut mala illa perpessi sunt aut nullis ad prohibendum uiribus uel auctoritate ualuerunt, tamen nocentiores a minus nocentibus in rescribendo distinxi aliamque causam posui eorum, qui timuerunt offendere potentes inimicos ecclesiae, aliam eorum, qui hoc committi uoluerunt, aliam eorum, qui commiserunt, aliam eorum, qui inmiserunt, nihil agi de inmissoribus nolens, quia hoc sine tormentis corporalibus a proposito nostro abhorrentibus fortasse non potest inueniri. Stoici autem tui omnes aequaliter nocentes esse concedunt, quibus placet omnia paria esse peccata; qui etiam duritiam suam, qua misericordiam uituperant, huic sententiae sociantes nullo modo censent omnibus pariter ignoscendum. sed omnes pariter esse puniendos. remoue ergo illos, quam longissime potes, a patrocinio causae istius et opta potius, ut tamquam Christiani agamus, ut, sicut optamus, nos in Christo eos, quibus parcimus, adquiramus, ne perniciosa illis dissolutione parcamus. deus misericors et uerax te felicitate uera donare dignetur.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the citizens of your earthly fatherland, you said that some, though not all, were innocent; yet, as you ought to notice on rereading my letter, you did not defend them. When I said, in reply to what you had written about wishing to leave your fatherland flourishing, that we had felt its thorns, not its flowers, you thought I was joking. Of course, one would like to joke amid such evils! That's exactly it! The ruins of the burned church are still smoking, and we joke about the matter! And though no innocent people occurred to me there except those who were absent, or who suffered those evils, or who had no strength or authority to prevent them, I nevertheless distinguished in my reply the more guilty from the less guilty, and set apart the case of those who feared to offend the powerful enemies of the church, of those who wished this to be committed, of those who committed it, and of those who instigated it; and I wished nothing done about the instigators, because this perhaps cannot be discovered without bodily tortures, which are abhorrent to our purpose. But your Stoics, who hold that all sins are equal, grant that all are equally guilty; and, combining with this opinion their hardness, by which they condemn mercy, they think not that all should be pardoned equally, but that all should be punished equally. Remove them, then, as far as you can, from the defence of this case, and wish rather that we may act as Christians, so that, as we wish, we may gain in Christ those whom we spare, and not spare them with a ruinous laxity. May the merciful and truthful God deign to grant you true happiness.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's refusal to have the instigators discovered by torture is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 104.17 (CSEL 34.2:594–595; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/104-1/#p-104-17).

## Letter 105.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:595–596
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, writing to the Donatists, answers their threats: they have stolen Christ's sheep and marked them with his baptism, which the Lord does not erase when he brings them back.

### Latin text

Caritas Christi, cui omnem hominem, quantum ad nostram pertinet uoluntatem, lucrari uolumus, tacere nobis non permittit. si propterea nos odistis, quia pacem uobis catholicam praedicamus, nos domino seruimus dicenti: Beati pacifici, quoniam ipsi filii dei uocabuntur, et in psalmo scriptum est: Cum his, qui oderunt pacem, eram pacificus; cum loquebar eis, debellabant me gratis. propterea mandauerunt nobis quidam presbyteri partis uestrae dicentes: Recedite a plebibus nostris, si non uultis, ut interficiamus uos. quanto iustius eis nos dicimus: Immo uos non recedite, sed accedite pacati ad plebes non nostras sed illius, cuius omnes sumus; aut si non uultis et inpacati estis, uos potius recedite a plebibus, pro quibus Christus suum sanguinem fudit, quas ideo uultis uestras facere, ne sint Christi, quamuis eas sub eius nomine possidere conemini, tamquam si seruus furetur oues de grege domini sui et, quaecumque ex illis nata fuerint, characterem domini sui eis infigat, ne furtum eius possit agnosci. sic enim fecerunt maiores uestri; separauerunt ab ecclesia Christi populos habentes baptismum Christi et, quicumque illis adcreuerunt. baptismo Christi eos baptizauerunt. sed dominus et fures punit. si non se correxerint, et oues ab errore reuocat ad gregem nec in eis suum exterminat characterem.

### English translation (Claude)

The love of Christ, for whom we wish to gain every man, as far as our will is concerned, does not allow us to keep silent. If you hate us because we preach Catholic peace to you, we serve the Lord who says, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God”; and in the psalm it is written: “With those who hated peace I was peaceable; when I spoke to them, they fought against me without cause.” For this reason certain presbyters of your party sent us word, saying: “Withdraw from our congregations, if you do not want us to kill you.” How much more justly do we say to them: “No, do not you withdraw, but come in peace to congregations that are not ours but his whose we all are; or, if you do not wish this and are not at peace, it is rather you who should withdraw from the congregations for which Christ shed his blood, which you wish to make yours precisely so that they may not be Christ's, though you try to possess them under his name.” It is as if a slave were to steal sheep from his master's flock and stamp his master's mark on whatever lambs were born of them, so that his theft could not be recognized. For so your forebears did: they separated from the church of Christ peoples who had the baptism of Christ, and whoever were added to them they baptized with the baptism of Christ. But the Lord both punishes the thieves, if they do not correct themselves, and calls the sheep back from error to the flock, and does not erase his mark in them.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:14: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:9: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 120:7 (119:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to the Donatists as a body (ca. 409–410). Quotations: Matt 5:9; Ps 120:7 (119:7 LXX, Old Latin form). Allusion: 2 Cor 5:14. The image of the master's mark (character) refers to the validity of Donatist baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.1 (CSEL 34.2:595–596; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-1).

## Letter 105.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:596
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The charge of being traditors was never proved; the Donatist claim that the church survives only in Africa has no Scripture, while Christ promised a church among all nations.

### Latin text

Dicitis nos traditores, quod nec maiores uestri in maiores nostros potuerunt nec uos in nos probare ullo modo poteritis. quid uobis uultis faciamus, qui, quando uobis dicimus, ut causam nostram et uestram patienter audiatis, non nostis nisi superbire et insanire? nam utique ostenderemus uobis, quia illi potius traditores fuerunt, qui Caecilianum et socios eius quasi traditionis crimine damnauerunt. et dicitis recedite a plebibus nostris, quas docetis, ut uobis credant et Christo non credant. uos enim eis dicitis propter traditores, quos non ostenditis, remansisse ecclesiam Christi in sola Africa partis Donati, quod non de lege, non de propheta, non de psalmo, non de apostolo, non de euangelio sed de corde uestro et de parentum uestrorum calumniis recitatis. Christus autem dicit praedicari in nomine suo paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipientibus ab Hierusalem, cui ecclesiae ex ore Christi manifestatae uos non communicatis et alios in uestram perditionem trahentes liberari non uultis.

### English translation (Claude)

You call us traditors, which neither could your forebears prove against our forebears nor can you prove against us in any way. What do you want us to do for you, when, as soon as we ask you to hear our case and yours patiently, you know only how to be proud and rage? For we would certainly show you that those were rather the traditors who condemned Caecilian and his associates on the charge of handing over the Scriptures. And you say, “Withdraw from our congregations”, whom you teach to believe you and not believe Christ. For you tell them that, because of traditors whom you do not show, the church of Christ has remained in Africa alone, in the party of Donatus; which you recite not from the law, not from a prophet, not from a psalm, not from an apostle, not from the Gospel, but from your own heart and from your forebears' slanders. But Christ says that repentance and forgiveness of sins are to be preached in his name among all nations, beginning from Jerusalem; and with this church, made manifest from Christ's mouth, you do not communicate, and dragging others into your ruin you do not wish to be set free.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:47: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Luke 24:47. “Traditors” were those accused of handing over the Scriptures in persecution.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.2 (CSEL 34.2:596; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-2).

## Letter 105.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:596–597
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The imperial laws were provoked by Donatist violence, as shown by recent attacks on converts at Casphaliana, Victoriana and Urga.

### Latin text

Si autem ideo uobis displicemus, quia per imperatorum iussiones ad unitatem cogimini, hoc uos fecistis, qui, ubicumque uellemus praedicare ueritatem, ut eam quisque securus audiret, ut uolens eligeret, numquam permisistis per uiolentias et terrores uestros. nolite stridere et perturbare animas uestras; patienter, si fieri potest, considerate, quod dicimus, et recolite facta Circumcellionum uestrorum et clericorum, qui duces eorum semper fuerunt, et uidebitis, quae causa uobis hoc excitauerit. unde iniuste querimini, quia, uobis omnia ista ut iuberentur, coegistis. nam ut longe praeterita et multa non repetamus, saltem recentia facta uestra cogitate. Marcus presbyter Casphalianensis a nemine coactus propria uoluntate catholicus factus est; qua re illum uestri persecuti sunt et paene occidissent, nisi dei manus per homines superuenientes uiolentias eorum compressisset. Restitutus Victorianensis ad catholicam nullo cogente se transtulit; qua re raptus est de domo sua, caesus, in aqua uolutatus, buda uestitus et nescio quot dies in captiuitate retentus est nec libertati propriae fortasse restitutus esset, nisi iam paene propter ipsam causam Proculianus sibi exhibitionem uideret imminere. Marcianus Urgensis catholicam unitatem propria uoluntate delegit: qua re subdiaconum eius, cum ipse fugisset, prope usque ad mortem caesum clerici uestri lapidibus obruerunt, quorum domus pro suo scelere euersae sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But if we displease you because you are compelled to unity by the orders of the emperors, you brought this about yourselves: wherever we wished to preach the truth, so that each might hear it in safety and choose it willingly, you never allowed it, by your violence and terror. Do not grind your teeth and disturb your souls; consider patiently, if possible, what we say, and recall the deeds of your Circumcellions and of the clergy who have always been their leaders, and you will see what cause has stirred this up against you. So you complain unjustly, since you compelled all these things to be ordered. For, not to repeat things long past and many, think at least of your recent deeds. Marcus, presbyter of Casphaliana, compelled by no one, became a Catholic of his own will; for this your people persecuted him and would almost have killed him, had not the hand of God, through men who arrived, checked their violence. Restitutus of Victoriana went over to the Catholic Church with no one compelling him; for this he was snatched from his house, beaten, rolled in water, dressed in rushes, and kept in captivity for I do not know how many days; and perhaps he would not have been restored to his freedom had not Proculeianus seen a summons to court threatening him almost on this very account. Marcianus of Urga chose Catholic unity of his own will; for this, when he himself had fled, your clergy beat his subdeacon almost to death and buried him under stones, and their houses were pulled down for their crime.

### Translation notes

- Proculeianus was the Donatist bishop of Hippo. The episodes are reported as Augustine gives them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.3 (CSEL 34.2:596–597; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-3).

## Letter 105.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:597–598
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts Donatist threats at Sinitum and the attempt by Crispinus's party to burn Bishop Possidius alive, whose fine Possidius had remitted.

### Latin text

Quid amplius dicamus? modo praeconem misistis, qui clamaret Siniti: Quisquis Maximino communicauerit, incendetur domus eius. quid? antequam ipse ad catholicam conuersus esset et nondum de transmarinis remeasset, ad quid aliud presbyterum Siniti miseramus, nisi ut nulli molestus nostros uisitaret et in domo iuris sui positus pacem catholicam uolentibus praedicaret? quem uos inde cum graui iniuria proiecistis. quid aliud agebamus, quando unus nostrum Calamensis episcopus Possidius ibat ad fundum Figulinensem. nisi ut nostri quamuis pauci, qui illic erant, uisitarentur et audito uerbo dei ad unitatem Christi, qui uellent, conuerterentur? cui ambulanti uiam suam latronum more insidiati sunt et, quia in eorum insidias cadere non potuit, eum aperta uiolentia in fundo Oliuetensi paene uiuum cum domo, quo fugerat, incenderant, nisi tertio suppositas flammas coloni eiusdem fundi propter periculum suae salutis extinguerent. et tamen cum Crispinus propter hoc factum in proconsulari iudicio conuinceretur haereticus, eiusdem episcopi Possidii intercessu decem libras auri non est exactus. cui beniuolentiae et mansuetudini ingratus ad imperatores catholicos ausus est appellare. unde hanc in uos iram dei, de qua murmuratis. multo importunius et uehementius prouocauit.

### English translation (Claude)

What more shall we say? Just now you sent a herald to cry out at Sinitum: “Whoever communicates with Maximinus, his house will be burned.” Why? Before he himself had been converted to the Catholic Church and had not yet returned from overseas, for what other purpose had we sent a presbyter to Sinitum than that, troubling no one, he might visit our people and, staying in a house of his own, preach Catholic peace to those who wished? You threw him out of there with grave injury. What else were we doing when one of us, Possidius, bishop of Calama, was going to the Figulina estate, than that our people there, though few, might be visited and, having heard the word of God, those who wished might be converted to the unity of Christ? As he went on his way they lay in ambush for him like robbers, and since he could not fall into their ambush, with open violence on the Olivetum estate they would almost have burned him alive with the house in which he had taken refuge, had not the tenants of that estate put out the flames, set three times, because of the danger to their own safety. And yet, when Crispinus was convicted as a heretic in the proconsul's court for this deed, at the intercession of the same bishop Possidius the ten pounds of gold were not exacted from him. Ungrateful for this kindness and gentleness, he dared to appeal to the Catholic emperors. So it was he who provoked, much more importunately and vehemently, this wrath of God against you about which you murmur.

### Translation notes

- Maximinus was the Donatist bishop of Sinitum who became a Catholic (see Ep. 23). Crispinus was the Donatist bishop of Calama; the ten pounds of gold was the fine for heretics under the imperial laws.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.4 (CSEL 34.2:597–598; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-4).

## Letter 105.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:598–599
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists suffer for their crimes, not as martyrs; the authorities rightly resist their violence, and many converts wish to be compelled so as to escape it.

### Latin text

Videtis, quia uos contra pacem Christi uiolenter insurgitis et patimini non pro ipso sed pro iniquitatibus uestris. quae est ista dementia, ut, cum male uiuitis, latronum facta faciatis et, cum iure punimini, gloriam martyrum requiratis? si ergo uos priuata uestra audacia tam uiolenter cogitis homines aut ire in errorem aut permanere in errore, quanto magis nos debemus per ordinatissimas potestates, quas deus secundum suam prophetiam subdidit Christo, resistere furoribus uestris, ut miserae animae de uestra dominatione liberatae eruantur a uetustissima falsitate et adsuescant in apertissima ueritate! nam quos a nobis nolentes dicitis cogi, multi etiam cogi se uolunt, quod nobis antea et postea confitentur, ut uel sic euadant oppressiones uestras.

### English translation (Claude)

You see that you rise violently against the peace of Christ, and suffer not for him but for your iniquities. What madness is this, that when you live wickedly you do the deeds of robbers, and when you are justly punished you seek the glory of martyrs? If, then, you by your private boldness so violently compel men either to go into error or to remain in error, how much more ought we, through the most ordered powers which God, according to his prophecy, has subjected to Christ, to resist your fury, so that wretched souls, set free from your domination, may be rescued from the most ancient falsehood and grow accustomed to the most open truth! For of those whom you say are compelled by us against their will, many even want to be compelled, as they confess to us before and after, so that even so they may escape your oppression.

### Scripture references

- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Ps 72:11 (kings serving Christ).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.5 (CSEL 34.2:598–599; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-5).

## Letter 105.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:599
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists spread a false report of an imperial pardon; Catholics rely not on men but on Christ, whom the prophets said kings would serve.

### Latin text

Et tamen quid est melius, proferre ueras imperatorum iussiones pro unitate an falsas indulgentias pro peruersitate, quod uos fecistis et mendacio uestro subito totam Africam implestis? in quo facto nihil aliud ostendistis nisi partem Donati semper de mendacio praesumentem omni uento iactari et circumferri, sicut scriptum est: Qui fidit in falsis, hic pascit uentos. sicut enim uera fuit ista indulgentia, sic uera sunt crimina Caeciliani et traditio Felicis Aptungensis, per quem ordinatus est, et quicquid aliud contra catholicos dicere consuestis, ut a pace ecclesiae Christi infelices separetis et infeliciter separemini. de nulla quidem nos hominis potestate praesumimus, quamuis utique multo sit honestius praesumere de imperatoribus quam praesumere de Circumcellionibus, praesumere de legibus quam praesumere de seditionibus; sed meminimus scriptum esse: Maledictus omnis, qui spem suam ponit in hominem. unde ergo praesumimus, si uultis nosse, illum cogitate, de quo propheta praenuntiauit dicens: Adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae, omnes gentes seruient illi. et ideo hac ecclesiae potestate utimur, quam ei dominus et promisit et dedit.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet which is better: to produce true orders of the emperors for unity, or false pardons for perversity, as you did, and suddenly filled all Africa with your lie? In this you showed nothing but that the party of Donatus, always relying on lies, is tossed and carried about by every wind, as it is written: “He who trusts in falsehoods feeds the winds.” For just as true as that pardon was, so true are the crimes of Caecilian and the handing over of the Scriptures by Felix of Abthugni, by whom he was ordained, and whatever else you usually say against the Catholics, so as to separate unhappy people from the peace of the church of Christ and be unhappily separated yourselves. We do not rely on any man's power, though it is surely much more honourable to rely on emperors than on Circumcellions, on laws than on riots; but we remember that it is written: “Cursed is everyone who puts his hope in man.” If you wish to know, then, on what we rely, think of him of whom the prophet foretold, saying: “All the kings of the earth shall worship him; all nations shall serve him.” And therefore we use this power of the church, which the Lord both promised and gave to it.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:14: allusion, high confidence
- Jer 17:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Donatists had claimed an imperial edict of toleration (409). “He who trusts in falsehoods feeds the winds” is from the Greek Proverbs (Prov 9:12a LXX), a verse not in the Hebrew text. Quotations: Jer 17:5; Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX). Allusion: Eph 4:14. Felix, bishop of Abthugni, consecrated Caecilian.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.6 (CSEL 34.2:599; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-6).

## Letter 105.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:599–600
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Kings who hold the truth rightly legislate for it, as Nebuchadnezzar did after the furnace; the Donatists themselves say Amen to his edict in the liturgy.

### Latin text

Imperatores enim si in errore essent, quod absit, pro errore suo contra ueritatem leges darent, per quas iusti et probarentur et coronarentur non faciendo, quod illi iuberent, quia deus prohiberet, sicut iusserat Nabuchodonosor, ut aurea statua adoraretur, quod qui facere noluerunt, deo talia prohibenti placuerunt. quando autem imperatores ueritatem tenent, pro ipsa ueritate contra errorem iubent, quod quisquis contempserit, ipse sibi iudicium adquirit; nam et inter homines poenas luit et apud deum frontem non habebit, quia hoc facere noluit, quod ei per cor regis ipsa ueritas iussit, sicut ipse Nabuchodonosor postea miraculo salutis trium puerorum commotus atque mutatus pro ueritate contra errorem edictum proposuit, ut, quicumque blasphemarent deum Sidrac, Misac et Abdenago, in interitum irent et domus eorum in dispersionem. et non uultis, ut aliquid tale contra uos iubeant imperatores Christiani, cum sciant a uobis in eis, quos rebaptizatis, Christum exsufflari? si iussiones regum non pertinent ad praedicandam religionem et sacrilegia prohibenda, quare ad edictum regis talia iubentis etiam ipsi uos signatis? an ignoratis uerba regis esse: Signa et ostenta, quae fecit mihi dominus deus excelsus, placuit mihi in conspectu meo adnuntiare, quam magnum et potens sit regnum eius, regnum sempiternum et potestas eius in saecula saeculorum? an, cum hoc audieritis, non respondetis: Amen et hoc dicto clara uoce ad edictum regis uos in sancta sollemnitate signatis? sed modo quia nihil apud imperatores potestis, nobis inde uultis facere inuidiam; si autem aliquid possetis, quanta faceretis, quando nihil potestis et non cessatis!

### English translation (Claude)

For if the emperors were in error, which God forbid, they would make laws for their error against the truth, by which the righteous would be both tested and crowned for not doing what they ordered, because God forbade it; as Nebuchadnezzar ordered that a golden statue be worshipped, and those who refused to do so pleased God, who forbade such things. But when emperors hold the truth, they give orders for the truth against error, and whoever despises them brings judgment on himself; for he both pays penalties among men and will have no face before God, because he would not do what the truth itself commanded him through the heart of the king. So Nebuchadnezzar himself afterwards, moved and changed by the miracle of the three youths' deliverance, issued an edict for the truth against error, that whoever blasphemed the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego should go to destruction and their houses be scattered. And do you not want Christian emperors to order something of the kind against you, when they know that Christ is exorcised by you in those you rebaptize? If the orders of kings have nothing to do with proclaiming religion and forbidding sacrileges, why do you yourselves sign yourselves at the edict of a king who ordered such things? Or do you not know that these are the words of the king: “It has pleased me to declare in my sight the signs and wonders which the Lord God Most High has done for me, how great and mighty is his kingdom, an everlasting kingdom, and his power for ages of ages”? Or, when you hear this, do you not answer “Amen”, and, having said it with a clear voice, sign yourselves at the king's edict in the holy solemnity? But now, because you can do nothing with the emperors, you wish to stir up ill will against us on that account; but if you could do anything, how much you would do, when you can do nothing and yet do not cease!

### Scripture references

- Dan 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:29 (3:96 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Dan 4:2 (3:99 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Dan 4:3 (3:100 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Dan 3:1–18; Dan 3:29 (3:96 LXX and Vulgate); Dan 4:2–3 (3:99–100 Vulgate), read in the liturgy. “Christ is exorcised” (exsufflari) refers to the exorcism by breathing at baptism, applied by Donatists to Catholics they rebaptized.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.7 (CSEL 34.2:599–600; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-7).

## Letter 105.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:600–601
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how the Donatists took Caecilian's case to Constantine and lost at Rome, at Arles, before the emperor, and in the trial of Felix of Abthugni.

### Latin text

Scitote: primi maiores uestri causam Caeciliani ad imperatorem Constantinum detulerunt. exigite hoc a nobis, probemus uobis et, si non probauerimus, facite de nobis, quicquid potueritis. sed quia Constantinus non est ausus de causa episcopi iudicare, eam discutiendam atque finiendam episcopis delegauit. quod et factum est in urbe Roma praesidente Melchiade episcopo illius ecclesiae cum multis collegis suis. qui cum Caecilianum innocentem pronuntiassent et Donatum, qui schisma Carthagini fecerat, sententia percussissent, iterum uestri ad imperatorem uenerunt, de iudicio episcoporum, in quo uicti fuerant, murmurauerunt. quando enim potest malus litigator laudare iudices, quibus iudicantibus uictus est? iterum tamen clementissimus imperator alios iudices episcopos dedit apud Arelatum, Galliae ciuitatem, et ab ipsis uestri ad ipsum imperatorem appellauerunt, donec etiam ipse causam cognosceret et Caecilianum innocentem, illos calumniosos pronuntiaret. nec sic totiens uicti quieuerunt, sed de Felice Aptungitano, per quem Caecilianus fuerat ordinatus, cotidianis interpellationibus ipsi imperatori taedium fecerunt dicentes eum esse traditorem et ideo Caecilianum episcopum esse non posse, quod a traditore fuerit ordinatus. donec et ipse Felix iussu imperatoris causa cognita ab Aeliano proconsule innocens probaretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Know this: your forebears were the first to bring the case of Caecilian before the emperor Constantine. Demand this of us, let us prove it to you, and if we do not prove it, do with us whatever you can. But because Constantine did not dare to judge the case of a bishop, he delegated it to bishops to be examined and decided. This was done in the city of Rome, under the presidency of Miltiades, bishop of that church, with many of his colleagues. When they had pronounced Caecilian innocent and passed sentence on Donatus, who had made the schism at Carthage, your people came again to the emperor and murmured against the judgment of the bishops in which they had been defeated. For when can a bad litigant praise the judges by whose judgment he was defeated? Yet again the most clement emperor gave other bishops as judges at Arles, a city of Gaul; and from them your people appealed to the emperor himself, until he too heard the case and pronounced Caecilian innocent and them slanderers. Not even so, defeated so many times, did they keep quiet, but wearied the emperor himself with daily petitions about Felix of Abthugni, by whom Caecilian had been ordained, saying that he was a traditor and that therefore Caecilian could not be a bishop, because he had been ordained by a traditor; until Felix himself, by the emperor's order, after the case had been heard by the proconsul Aelianus, was proved innocent.

### Translation notes

- Council of Rome under Miltiades (313), Council of Arles (314), Constantine's judgment (316), trial of Felix before the proconsul Aelianus (315).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.8 (CSEL 34.2:600–601; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-8).

## Letter 105.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:601–602
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: From Constantine on, Christian emperors legislated against the Donatists; only Julian the Apostate favoured them, and the sons of Theodosius follow Constantine.

### Latin text

Tunc Constantinus prior contra partem Donati seuerissimam legem dedit. hunc imitati filii eius talia praeceperunt. quibus succedens Iulianus, desertor Christi et inimicus, supplicantibus uestris Rogatiano et Pontio libertatem perditioni parti Donati permisit; denique tunc reddidit basilicas haereticis, quando templa daemoniis. eo modo putans Christianum nomen posse perire de terris, si unitati ecclesiae, de qua lapsus fuerat, inuideret et sacrilegas dissensiones liberas esse permitteret. haec erat eius praedicanda iustitia, quam supplicantes Rogatianus et Pontius laudauerunt dicentes homini apostatae, quod apud eum sola iustitia haberet locum. huic successit Iouianus, qui quoniam cito mortuus est, nihil de rebus talibus iussit. deinde Valentinianus; legite, quae contra uos iusserit. inde Gratianus et Theodosius; legite, quando uultis, quae de uobis constituerint. quid ergo de filiis Theodosii miramini, quasi aliud in hac causa sequi debuerunt, quam Constantini iudicium per tot Christianos imperatores firmissime custoditum?

### English translation (Claude)

Then Constantine was the first to pass a most severe law against the party of Donatus. His sons imitated him and gave similar orders. Julian, succeeding them, a deserter and enemy of Christ, at the petition of your Rogatianus and Pontius, granted freedom to the party of Donatus for its ruin; in short, he gave back basilicas to the heretics at the same time as temples to the demons, thinking that in this way the Christian name could perish from the earth, if he begrudged the unity of the church from which he had fallen and allowed sacrilegious dissensions to be free. This was his justice to be proclaimed, which Rogatianus and Pontius praised in their petition, saying to an apostate that with him justice alone had a place. Jovian succeeded him, who, since he died soon, ordered nothing about such matters. Then Valentinian: read what he ordered against you. Then Gratian and Theodosius: read, when you like, what they decreed about you. Why then are you surprised at the sons of Theodosius, as if they ought to have followed anything else in this case than the judgment of Constantine, so firmly upheld by so many Christian emperors?

### Translation notes

- Rogatianus and Pontius were Donatist bishops who petitioned Julian (361–362); compare Ep. 93.12. The digital text's “perditioni parti” is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.9 (CSEL 34.2:601–602; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-9).

## Letter 105.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:602
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Constantine's judgment, sought by the Donatists themselves, still stands; they would rather have Julian back, though freedom for error is the soul's worst death.

### Latin text

Ad Constantinum autem, sicut diximus, sicut uobis, quando uultis, si tamen ignoratis, ostendimus, maiores uestri causam Caeciliani ultro detulerunt. defunctus est Constantinus, sed iudicium Constantini contra uos uiuit, quo uestri causam miserunt, apud quem iudices episcopos reprehenderunt, ad quem a iudicibus episcopis appellauerunt, quem taediosissime de Felice Aptungitano interpellauerunt, a quo totiens conuicti et confusi redierunt et a pernicie furoris et animositatis suae non recesserunt eamque uobis posteris suis hereditariam reliquerunt, ut tam inpudenter de iussionibus Christianorum imperatorum faciatis inuidiam, cum, si uobis liceret, non quidem iam Constantinum Christianum, quia ueritati fauit, contra nos interpellaretis, sed apostatam Iulianum ab inferis excitaretis, quasi uero, si aliquid tale contingeret, esset magnum malum nisi uobis. quae est enim peior mors animae quam libertas erroris?

### English translation (Claude)

But to Constantine, as we have said, and as we show you whenever you wish, if indeed you do not know it, your forebears of their own accord brought the case of Caecilian. Constantine is dead, but the judgment of Constantine lives against you: to him your people sent the case, before him they found fault with the episcopal judges, to him they appealed from the episcopal judges, him they petitioned most wearisomely about Felix of Abthugni, from him they returned so often convicted and confounded, and yet they did not depart from the ruin of their fury and animosity, but left it as an inheritance to you their descendants; so that you so shamelessly stir up ill will about the orders of Christian emperors, when, if you were allowed, you would not indeed petition the Christian Constantine against us, since he favoured the truth, but would raise up the apostate Julian from the dead; as if, should anything of the kind happen, it would be a great evil to anyone but you. For what worse death of the soul is there than freedom for error?

### Translation notes

- The closing maxim (“what worse death of the soul than freedom for error?”) is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.10 (CSEL 34.2:602; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-10).

## Letter 105.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:602–603
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: When emperors command unity, Christ commands through them, as Paul forbade divisions; Catholics persecuted by heretical emperors were true martyrs.

### Latin text

Sed iam tollamus ista omnia de medio; amemus pacem, quam omnis doctus et indoctus intellegit praeponendam esse discordiae, diligamus et teneamus unitatem. hoc iubent imperatores, quod iubet et Christus, quia, cum bonum iubent, per illos non iubet nisi Christus. et nos etiam per apostolum obsecrat, ut id ipsum dicamus omnes et non sint in nobis schismata neque dicamus: Ego quidem sum Pauli, ego autem Apollo, ego uero Cephae, ego autem Christi, sed simul omnes non simus nisi Christi, quia nec diuisus est Christus nec Paulus crucifixus est pro nobis, quanto minus Donatus! nec in nomine Pauli baptizati sumus, quanto minus in Donati! hoc dicunt et imperatores, quia Christiani catholici sunt, non idolorum serui sicut uester Iulianus, non haeretici, sicut quidam fuerunt et catholicam persecuti sunt, quando ueri Christiani non pro haeretico errore poenas iustissimas sicut uos sed pro catholica ueritate passiones gloriosissimas pertulerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But now let us remove all these things from the midst; let us love peace, which every learned and unlearned person understands is to be preferred to discord; let us love and hold unity. The emperors command this, which Christ also commands; for when they command good, it is none other than Christ who commands through them. And he entreats us through the apostle that we all say the same thing and that there be no schisms among us, nor that we say, “I am of Paul, I of Apollos, I of Cephas, I of Christ”, but that all together we be none but Christ's; for neither is Christ divided, nor was Paul crucified for us, how much less Donatus! Nor were we baptized in the name of Paul, how much less in that of Donatus! This the emperors too say, because they are Catholic Christians, not slaves of idols like your Julian, nor heretics, as some were who persecuted the Catholic Church, when true Christians endured not most just penalties for heretical error, as you do, but most glorious sufferings for Catholic truth.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: 1 Cor 1:10–13. Heretical (Arian) emperors such as Constantius and Valens are meant.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.11 (CSEL 34.2:602–603; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-11).

## Letter 105.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:603–604
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The imperial law rightly states that baptism does not depend on the minister's merit; the Donatist view would make an unknown bad minister preferable to a known good one.

### Latin text

Adtendite, quam manifestissima ueritate per cor regis, quod in manu dei est, ipse deus dixerit in ista ipsa lege, quam contra uos prolatam dicitis, est autem, si intellegatis, prolata pro uobis; adtendite, quid habeant uerba principis: Nam si in eis, qui primo initiati sunt, idcirco religio baptismatis iudicatur infirma, quod hi, a quibus accipitur, peccatores putentur, totiens renouari necesse erit traditum sacramentum, quotiens indignus fuerit inuentus conlati baptismatis administer, et fides nostra non ex nostrae uoluntatis arbitrio neque ex diuini muneris gratia sed ex meritis sacerdotum et clericorum qualitate pendebit. faciant mille concilia episcopi uestri, huic uni sententiae respondeant et, ad quod uolueritis, consentimus uobis. uidete enim, quam peruerse et impie dicatur, quod dicere soletis, quia, si bonus sit homo, ipse sanctificat eum, quem baptizat, si autem malus sit et nesciat ille, qui baptizatur, tunc deus sanctificat. hoc si uerum est, optare ergo debent homines, ut a malis ignoratis baptizentur potius quam a notis bonis, ut magis a deo quam ab homine possint sanctificari. sed absit a nobis ista dementia. quare ergo non uerum dicimus et recte sapimus, quia semper dei est illa gratia et dei sacramentum hominis autem solum ministerium, qui si bonus est, adhaeret deo et operatur cum deo, si autem malus est, operatur per illum deus uisibilem sacramenti formam, ipse autem donat inuisibilem gratiam? hoc sapiamus omnes et non sint in nobis schismata.

### English translation (Claude)

Notice with what most manifest truth God himself has spoken, through the heart of the king, which is in the hand of God, in this very law which you say was issued against you, but which, if you understand, was issued for you; notice what the emperor's words contain: “For if, in those who were first initiated, the religion of baptism is judged weak because those from whom it is received are thought sinners, the sacrament handed down will have to be renewed as often as the minister of the baptism conferred is found unworthy, and our faith will depend not on the choice of our will nor on the grace of the divine gift but on the merits of priests and the character of clerics.” Let your bishops hold a thousand councils; let them answer this one sentence, and we will agree with you on whatever you wish. For see how perverse and ungodly it is to say what you usually say: that if the man is good, he himself sanctifies the one he baptizes; but if he is bad and the one baptized does not know it, then God sanctifies. If this is true, men ought then to wish to be baptized by unknown bad men rather than by known good men, so that they may be sanctified by God rather than by man. But far be such madness from us. Why then do we not speak the truth and think rightly: that the grace is always God's and the sacrament God's, but only the ministry is man's; and if he is good, he clings to God and works with God, but if he is bad, God works through him the visible form of the sacrament, while he himself gives the invisible grace? Let us all think this, and let there be no schisms among us.

### Scripture references

- Prov 21:1: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:10: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quoted law is an edict of Honorius (405) against rebaptism. References: Prov 21:1; 1 Cor 1:10. Augustine's teaching that God gives the grace whatever the minister's merit is translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.12 (CSEL 34.2:603–604; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-12).

## Letter 105.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:604–605
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine pleads for unity, says God corrects the Donatists through the Catholics and the laws, and notes that their bishops refuse to debate, though Christ answered even the devil.

### Latin text

Concordate nobiscum, fratres; diligimus uos; hoc uobis uolumus, quod et nobis. si propterea nos grauius odistis, quia errare uos et perire non permittimus, hoc deo dicite, quem timemus minantem malis pastoribus et dicentem: Quod errauerat, non reuocastis et, quod perierat, non inquisistis. hoc uobis per nos deus ipse facit siue obsecrando siue minando siue corripiendo siue damnis siue laboribus siue per suas occultas admonitiones uel uisitationes siue per potestatum temporalium leges. intellegite, quid uobiscum agatur; perire uos non uult deus in sacrilega discordia alienatos a matre uestra catholica. nihil in nos aliquando probare potuistis; uestri episcopi conuenti a nobis num nobiscum pacifice conferre uoluerunt quasi fugientes cum peccatoribus loqui? quis ferat istam superbiam? quasi Paulus apostolus non contulerit cum peccatoribus et cum ualde sacrilegis — legite actus apostolorum et uidete —, quasi ipse dominus non cum Iudaeis, a quibus crucifixus est, sermonem de lege habuerit eisque congruenter responderit. postremo diabolus est primus omnium peccatorum, qui conuerti ad iustitiam numquam poterit, et tamen nec ipse dominus de lege dedignatus est ei respondere, ut intellegatis istos ideo nobiscum nolle conferre, quia causam suam perditam norunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Be of one mind with us, brothers; we love you; we wish for you what we wish for ourselves. If you hate us more bitterly because we do not allow you to go astray and perish, say this to God, whom we fear when he threatens bad shepherds and says: “What had strayed you did not bring back, and what was lost you did not seek.” This God himself does to you through us, whether by entreating, or threatening, or rebuking, or by losses, or by hardships, or through his hidden warnings or visitations, or through the laws of temporal powers. Understand what is being done with you: God does not wish you to perish in sacrilegious discord, estranged from your Catholic mother. You have never been able to prove anything against us. When your bishops were approached by us, did they wish to confer peaceably with us, as though fleeing from speaking with sinners? Who can bear such pride? As if the apostle Paul did not confer with sinners, and with very sacrilegious ones (read the Acts of the Apostles and see); as if the Lord himself did not hold discussion about the law with the Jews, by whom he was crucified, and answer them fittingly. Finally, the devil is the first of all sinners, who can never be converted to righteousness, and yet not even the Lord himself disdained to answer him from the law; so that you may understand that these men will not confer with us because they know their case is lost.

### Scripture references

- Ezek 34:4: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 17:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 4:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ezek 34:4. References: Acts 17:17–34; Matt 4:1–11. The question about the bishops is grammatically a question expecting “no” (the digital text reads “num”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.13 (CSEL 34.2:604–605; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-13).

## Letter 105.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:605–607
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The same Scriptures that reveal Christ reveal a worldwide church, as a series of paired texts from Genesis and the Psalms shows.

### Latin text

Nos ignoramus, quid aduersum se ipsos homines iactent, qui calumniosis dissensionibus gaudent. in scripturis didicimus Christum, in scripturis didicimus ecclesiam. has scripturas communiter habemus; quare non in eis et Christum et ecclesiam communiter retinemus? nos ubi agnouimus eum, de quo dixit apostolus: Abrahae dictae sunt promissiones et semini eius; non dicit et seminibus tamquam in multis, sed tamquam in uno et semini tuo, quod est Christus, ibi agnouimus ecclesiam, de qua deus dicit ad Abraham: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes. ubi agnouimus Christum in psalmo de se prophetantem: Dominus dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu; ego hodie genui te, ibi agnouimus ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Deus deorum dominus locutus est, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Et uocauit terram a solis ortu usque ad occasum. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Et ipse tamquam sponsus procedens de thalamo suo exultauit ut gigas ad currendam uiam, ibi agnouimus ecclesiam in eo, quod paulo superius dicitur: In omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum et in fines orbis terrae uerba eorum; in sole posuit tabernaculum suum; ipsa est ecclesia in sole posita, hoc est in manifestatione omnibus nota usque ad terminos terrae. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Foderunt manus meas et pedes, dinumerauerunt omnia ossa mea, ipsi uero considerauerunt et aspexerunt me, diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestem meam miserunt sortem, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod paulo post in psalmo ipso dicitur: Commemorabuntur et conuertentur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium, quoniam domini est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Exaltare super caelos, deus, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Et super omnem terram gloria tua. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Deus, iudicium tuum regi da et iustitiam tuam filio regis, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod de illo in psalmo ipso dicitur: Dominabitur a mari usque ad mare et a flumine usque ad terminos orbis terrae, coram illo procident Aethiopes et inimici eius terram lingent, reges Tharsis et insulae munera offerent, reges Arabum et Saba dona adducent et adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae, omnes gentes seruient illi.

### English translation (Claude)

We do not know what men who delight in slanderous dissensions throw at each other. In the Scriptures we have learned Christ; in the Scriptures we have learned the church. We have these Scriptures in common; why do we not hold both Christ and the church in common in them? Where we have recognized him of whom the apostle said, “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed; he does not say ‘and to seeds’, as of many, but as of one, ‘and to your seed’, which is Christ”, there we have recognized the church, of which God says to Abraham: “In your seed shall all nations be blessed.” Where we have recognized Christ prophesying of himself in the psalm, “The Lord said to me: You are my Son; today I have begotten you”, there we have recognized the church in what follows: “Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance, and the ends of the earth as your possession.” Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “The God of gods, the Lord, has spoken”, there we have recognized the church too in what follows: “And has called the earth from the rising of the sun to its setting.” Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “And he, like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, has rejoiced like a giant to run his course”, there we have recognized the church in what is said a little before: “Their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world; in the sun he has set his tabernacle”; this is the church set in the sun, that is, in open display, known to all to the ends of the earth. Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “They pierced my hands and feet, they numbered all my bones; they looked and stared at me; they divided my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing”, there we have recognized the church too in what is said a little later in the same psalm: “All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations shall worship before him, for the kingdom is the Lord's and he shall rule over the nations.” Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “Be exalted above the heavens, O God”, there we have recognized the church too in what follows: “And your glory above all the earth.” Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “O God, give your judgment to the king, and your righteousness to the king's son”, there we have recognized the church too in what is said of him in the same psalm: “He shall rule from sea to sea and from the river to the ends of the earth; before him the Ethiopians shall fall down and his enemies lick the dust; the kings of Tarshish and the islands shall offer gifts, the kings of the Arabs and Saba shall bring presents, and all the kings of the earth shall worship him, all nations shall serve him.”

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:5 (18:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:4 (18:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:16 (21:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:17 (21:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:18 (21:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:28 (21:29 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 57:5 (56:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:1 (71:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:9 (71:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:10 (71:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Gal 3:16; Gen 22:18; Ps 2:7–8; Ps 50:1 (49:1 LXX); Ps 19:5, 4 (18:6, 5 LXX, “in the sun he has set his tabernacle” in the Greek and Latin); Ps 22:16–18, 27–28 (21:17–19, 28–29 LXX); Ps 57:5 (56:6 LXX); Ps 72:1, 8–11 (71:1, 8–11 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.14 (CSEL 34.2:605–607; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-14).

## Letter 105.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:607–608
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Daniel's stone, Zephaniah, Habakkuk and Isaiah 53–54 likewise reveal both Christ and the worldwide church.

### Latin text

ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est lapidem de monte sine manibus praecisum fregisse omnia regna terrarum utique illa, quae de culturis daemonum praesumebant, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod dictum est lapidem ipsum creuisse et factum montem magnum et repleuisse omnem terram. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Praeualebit dominus aduersus eos et exterminabit omnes deos gentium terrae, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod illic sequitur: Et adorabunt in conspectu eius unusquisque de loco suo omnes insulae gentium. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Deus ab Africo ueniet et sanctus de monte umbroso; operiet caelos uirtus eius, ibi agnouimus ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Et laudis eius plena est terra. ab Africo enim posita est Hierusalem, sicut legitur in libro Iesu Naue, unde nomen Christi diffusum est; et ibi est mons umbrosus, mons oliueti, unde ascendit in caelum, ut cooperiret caelos uirtus eius et impleretur ecclesia per omnem terram laudis eius. ubi agnouimus Christum in eo, quod scriptum est: Sicut ouis ad immolandum ductus est et sicut agnus coram tondente se fuit sine uoce, sic non aperuit os suum et cetera, quae illic de eius passione dicuntur, ibi agnouimus et ecclesiam in eo, quod illic dicitur: Laetare sterilis, quae non paris, erumpe et exclama, quae non parturis, quoniam multi filii desertae magis quam eius, quae habet uirum; dixit enim dominus. dilata locum tabernaculi tui et aulaeas tuas confige; non est, quod parcas; porrige longius funiculos et palos ualidos confirma; etiam atque etiam in dextram atque sinistram extende. semen enim tuum hereditabit gentes et ciuitates, quae desertae erant, inhabitabis. non est quod metuas, praeualebis enim, nec erubescas, quod detestabilis fueris; confusionem enim in perpetuum obliuisceris, ignominiae uiduitatis tuae non eris memor. quoniam ego sum dominus, qui feci te, dominus nomen ei et, qui eruit te, ipse deus Israhel uniuersae terrae uocabitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, that a stone cut from the mountain without hands broke all the kingdoms of the earth, certainly those that relied on the worship of demons, there we have recognized the church too in what is said, that the stone itself grew and became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “The Lord will prevail against them and will destroy all the gods of the nations of the earth”, there we have recognized the church too in what follows there: “And they shall worship before him, each from his own place, all the islands of the nations.” Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “God will come from the south, and the Holy One from the shady mountain; his power will cover the heavens”, there we have recognized the church in what follows: “And the earth is full of his praise.” For Jerusalem lies toward the south, as is read in the book of Joshua son of Nun, whence the name of Christ was spread abroad; and there is the shady mountain, the Mount of Olives, from which he ascended into heaven, so that his power might cover the heavens and the church be filled with his praise throughout all the earth. Where we have recognized Christ in what is written, “He was led as a sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before its shearer is dumb, so he did not open his mouth”, and the rest that is said there of his passion, there we have recognized the church too in what is said there: “Rejoice, you barren one who does not bear; break forth and cry out, you who are not in labour, for many are the children of the desolate, more than of her who has a husband; for the Lord has said: Enlarge the place of your tent and fix your curtains; do not hold back; lengthen your cords and strengthen your stakes; spread out again and again to the right and to the left. For your seed shall inherit the nations, and you shall inhabit the cities that were desolate. There is nothing for you to fear, for you shall prevail; nor be ashamed that you were detestable; for you shall forget your shame for ever; you shall not remember the disgrace of your widowhood. For I am the Lord who made you, the Lord is his name; and he who rescues you, the God of Israel himself, shall be called God of the whole earth.”

### Scripture references

- Dan 2:34: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 2:35: allusion, high confidence
- Zeph 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Hab 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Isa 53:7: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:1: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:2: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:3: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:4: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References and quotations: Dan 2:34–35; Zeph 2:11; Hab 3:3 (Old Latin, following the Greek, “from the south … from the shady mountain”); Acts 1:12; Isa 53:7; Isa 54:1–5. The reference to Joshua is perhaps to the southern boundary list of Judah (Josh 15), uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.15 (CSEL 34.2:607–608; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-15).

## Letter 105.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:608–610
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Catholics correct the bad where they can and tolerate the rest without sharing their sins, as Christ's parables of the tares, chaff and net teach, and as he bade obey bad leaders' teaching.

### Latin text

Non nouimus, quid de traditoribus dicatis, quos numquam conuincere, numquam ostendere potuistis. non dico, quia uestri potius in tali crimine detecti et confessi manifestantur; quid ad nos pertinet de sarcinis alienis, nisi ut, quos possumus, corrigamus uel correptione uel quacumque disciplina in spiritu mansuetudinis et diligentia caritatis, quos autem corrigere non ualemus, etiam si necessitas cogit pro salute ceterorum, ut dei sacramenta nobiscum communicent, peccatis tamen eorum non communicemus, quod non fit nisi consentiendo et fauendo? sic enim eos in isto mundo, in quo ecclesia catholica per omnes gentes diffunditur, quem agrum suum dominus dicit, tamquam zizania inter triticum uel in hac unitatis area tamquam paleam frumento permixtam uel intra retia uerbi et sacramenti tamquam malos pisces cum bonis inclusos usque ad tempus messis aut uentilationis aut litoris toleramus, ne propter illos eradicemus et triticum aut grana nuda ante tempus de area separata non in horreum mittenda purgemus, sed uolatilibus colligenda proiciamus aut disruptis per schismata retibus, dum quasi malos pisces cauemus, in mare perniciosae libertatis exeamus. propter hoc enim his atque aliis similitudinibus dominus seruorum suorum tolerantiam confirmauit, ne, dum se boni putant malorum permixtione culpari, per humanas et temerarias dissensiones aut paruulos perdant aut paruuli pereant. quod usque adeo caelestis magister cauendum praemonuit, ut etiam de praepositis malis plebem securam faceret, ne propter illos doctrinae salutaris cathedra desereretur, in qua coguntur etiam mali bona dicere. neque enim sua sunt, quae dicunt, sed dei, qui in cathedra unitatis doctrinam posuit ueritatis. proinde ille uerax et ipsa ueritas de praepositis sua mala facientibus et dei bona dicentibus ait: Quae dicunt, facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite; dicunt enim et non faciunt. non utique diceret: Quae faciunt, facere nolite, nisi manifesta essent mala, quae faciunt.

### English translation (Claude)

We do not know what you say about traditors, whom you have never been able to convict or show. I do not say that it is rather your people who are shown to have been detected and to have confessed such a crime. What have we to do with other people's burdens, except to correct those we can, by rebuke or by any discipline, in a spirit of gentleness and with the diligence of love; and as for those we cannot correct, even if necessity compels, for the salvation of the rest, that they share the sacraments of God with us, yet not to share in their sins, which happens only by consenting and favouring? For so we tolerate them in this world, in which the Catholic Church is spread through all nations, which the Lord calls his field, like weeds among the wheat; or on this threshing floor of unity like chaff mixed with the grain; or within the nets of the word and the sacrament like bad fish enclosed with good, until the time of the harvest, or the winnowing, or the shore; lest because of them we also uproot the wheat, or cleanse bare grains separated from the threshing floor before the time, not to be sent into the barn but thrown out to be gathered by the birds; or, the nets broken by schisms, while we guard against bad fish as it were, we go out into the sea of ruinous freedom. For this reason the Lord strengthened the forbearance of his servants by these and other similitudes, lest, while the good think they are blamed for mixing with the bad, by human and rash dissensions they either destroy the little ones or the little ones perish. The heavenly Master gave warning to beware of this so far as to make the people secure even about bad leaders, lest because of them the chair of saving doctrine be deserted, in which even the bad are compelled to say good things. For what they say is not theirs but God's, who placed the teaching of truth in the chair of unity. So he who is truthful and the Truth itself says of leaders who do their own evil and say God's good: “What they say, do; but what they do, do not do; for they say and do not do.” He certainly would not say, “What they do, do not do”, unless the evil they do were manifest.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:1: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 23:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 23:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- References: Gal 6:1–2, 5; Matt 13:24–30, 38; Matt 3:12; Matt 13:47–48; Matt 13:4; Matt 23:2–3 (quoted).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.16 (CSEL 34.2:608–610; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-16).

## Letter 105.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:610
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If the Donatists believe the Scriptures about the unseen Christ, they should believe them about the visible church; Augustine prays that God kill their error, not them.

### Latin text

Non ergo propter malos in mala dissensione pereamus, quamuis uestros maiores non execratores malorum sed accusatores innocentium fuisse, si uelitis, possimus ostendere. sed quicumque illi et qualescumque fuerint, portent sarcinas suas. ecce scripturae communes, ecce ubi nouimus Christum, ecce ubi nouimus ecclesiam. si Christum ipsum tenetis, ipsam ecclesiam quare non tenetis? si in ipsum Christum, quem legitis et non uidetis, tamen propter ueritatem scripturarum creditis, quare ecclesiam negatis, quam et legitis et uidetis? haec uobis dicendo et ad hoc bonum pacis et unitatis et caritatis uos compellendo inimici uobis facti sumus et mandatis, quia occidetis nos, qui ueritatem uobis dicimus et in errore uos perire, quantum possumus, non permittimus. uindicet nos deus de uobis, ut ipsum errorem uestrum in uobis occidat et nobiscum de ueritate gaudeatis. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us not, then, perish in evil dissension because of the bad; though we could show, if you wished, that your forebears were not abhorrers of the bad but accusers of the innocent. But whoever and whatever they were, let them carry their own burdens. Here are the Scriptures we share; here is where we know Christ; here is where we know the church. If you hold Christ himself, why do you not hold the church itself? If you believe in Christ himself, whom you read of and do not see, because of the truth of the Scriptures, why do you deny the church, which you both read of and see? By saying these things to you and urging you to this good of peace, unity and love, we have become your enemies, and you send word that you will kill us, who tell you the truth and, as far as we can, do not allow you to perish in error. May God avenge us on you by killing that very error of yours in you, so that you may rejoice with us in the truth. Amen.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Reference: Gal 6:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 105.17 (CSEL 34.2:610; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-105-17).

## Letter 106.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-106-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:610–611
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns the Donatist bishop Macrobius not to rebaptize a Catholic subdeacon, since the Donatists do not rebaptize those baptized by the Maximianist Felicianus, now reconciled with them.

### Latin text

Audiui, quod quendam subdiaconum nostrum rebaptizare disponis. noli; sic deo uiuas, sic deo placeas, sic Christi sacramenta non inaniter habeas, sic non in aeternum a Christi corpore separeris. noli, rogo te, frater, pro te ipso te magis rogo. certe paululum adtende, quod dico. Felicianus Mustitanus Primianum Carthaginiensem damnauit et uicissim ab illo etiam ipse damnatus est. diu Felicianus in sacrilego Maximiani schismate fuit, multos ibi per suas ecclesias baptizauit modo cum Primiano uester episcopus, sed et neminem post eum baptizatis. qua ergo licentia post nos adhuc rebaptizandum putatis? hanc mihi solue quaestionem et me rebaptiza; si autem hanc soluere non potes, parce alienae animae, parce tuae. aut si me de Feliciano falsum dixisse arguis, exige, ut probem; certe, si non probauero, tunc fac, quod putas. addo etiam, si non probauero, non sim episcopus communionis meae; si autem probauero, noli esse inimicus salutis tuae. opto te, domine frater, in pace esse nobiscum.

### English translation (Claude)

I have heard that you intend to rebaptize a certain subdeacon of ours. Do not do it; so may you live to God, so may you please God, so may you not have the sacraments of Christ in vain, so may you not be separated for ever from the body of Christ. Do not, I beg you, brother; I beg you more for your own sake. At least pay a little attention to what I say. Felicianus of Musti condemned Primianus of Carthage and was in turn condemned by him. For a long time Felicianus was in the sacrilegious schism of Maximianus and baptized many there through his churches; now your bishop is with Primianus, and yet you baptize no one after him. By what licence, then, do you still think one must be rebaptized after us? Solve this question for me and rebaptize me; but if you cannot solve it, spare another's soul, spare your own. Or, if you charge that I have said something false about Felicianus, demand that I prove it; certainly, if I do not prove it, then do what you think. I add even this: if I do not prove it, let me not be a bishop of my communion; but if I prove it, do not be an enemy of your own salvation. I pray, my lord brother, that you may be at peace with us.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Macrobius, Donatist bishop of Hippo (ca. 409–410). Felicianus of Musti, a Maximianist bishop condemned at the Donatist council of Bagai (394), was later received back with his clergy and baptisms; Augustine often uses this case.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 106.1 (CSEL 34.2:610–611; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-106-1).

## Letter 107.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-107-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:611–612
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Maximus and Theodorus report to Augustine that the Donatist bishop Macrobius heard his letter but refused to answer on the case of Primianus.

### Latin text

Ex praecepto sanctitatis tuae ad episcopum Macrobium perreximus. ad quem cum litteras beatitudinis tuae perferremus, primo negauit se, ne eidem legerentur. deinde aliquando ex nostra suggestione commotus easdem sibi uoluit recitari, quibus relectis ait: Non possum nisi ad me uenientes suscipere et eisdem fidem, quam postulauerint, dare cum autem a nobis eidem diceretur, quid de facto Primiani diceret, dixit se nuper ordinatum patris sui iudicem esse non posse, sed in id, quod a prioribus suis acceperit, permanere. quod necesse habuimus his litteris sanctitati tuae significare. beatitudinem tuam nobis dominus custodiat, domine pater.

### English translation (Claude)

At the instruction of your Holiness we went to bishop Macrobius. When we delivered your Blessedness's letter to him, at first he refused to have it read to him. Then, at length moved by our urging, he consented to have it read to him; and when it had been read, he said: “I can only receive those who come to me and give them the faith they ask for.” But when we asked him what he would say about the case of Primianus, he said that, having been recently ordained, he could not be a judge of his father, but would abide in what he had received from his predecessors. We thought it necessary to inform your Holiness of this by this letter. May the Lord keep your Blessedness for us, my lord father.

### Translation notes

- The letter is to Augustine traditionally identified as Maximus and Theodorus, who delivered Ep. 106. Primianus, the Donatist primate of Carthage, is the “father” whom Macrobius would not judge.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 107.1 (CSEL 34.2:611–612; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/105-1/#p-107-1).

## Letter 108.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:612–613
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the Donatist bishop Macrobius why he rebaptizes Catholics when his own party accepted the baptism given by the Maximianist Felicianus.

### Latin text

Carissimi filii mei, honorabiles uiri, cum ad tuam beniuolentiam adtulissent litteras meas, quibus admonui rogauique te, ne subdiaconum nostrum rebaptizares, rescripserunt mihi te respondisse: Non possum nisi ad me uenientes suscipere et eis fidem, quam postulauerint, dare. et tamen, si ad te uenerit in uestra communione baptizatus, qui diu a uobis separatus fuit, et per ignorantiam se putauerit denuo baptizandum idque poposcerit, cum quaesieris et cognoueris, ubi fuerit baptizatus, suscipis quidem ad te uenientem nec tamen ei das, quam postulat, fidem, sed doces hominem habere, quod petit, nec uerba errantis adtendis, sed studium adhibes corrigentis. male ergo dantem, quod iam dandum non est, et sacramentum, quod datum est, uiolantem suus error accusat, non petentis excusat. dic itaque mihi, obsecro te, quo modo non habeat, qui petiuit abs te, quod iam acceperat per me? si propter alienam aquam et alienum fontem, quod solent dicere, qui non intellegunt, quia scriptum est: Ab aqua aliena abstine te et de fonte alieno ne biberis, Felicianus quando separatus est a nobis in parte Maximiani, ueritatis adulter, catena sacrilegii, sicut concilii uestri uerba indicant, trahebatur; si secum abstulerat fontem uestrum, quis erat fons, in quo illo separato uestros baptizastis? si autem in alieno fonte baptizauerat, quare post eum non rebaptizastis? simul enim nunc uester episcopus sedet cum Primiano a se damnato et damnatore suo.

### English translation (Claude)

My dearest sons, honorable men, when they had brought to Your Benevolence my letter, in which I admonished and asked you not to rebaptize our subdeacon, wrote back to me that you had replied: “I cannot do otherwise than receive those who come to me and give them the faith they ask for.” And yet, if someone baptized in your communion who had long been separated from you should come to you, and through ignorance think that he must be baptized again and ask for it, when you have inquired and learned where he was baptized, you do indeed receive him as he comes to you, and yet you do not give him the faith he asks for; rather you teach the man that he has what he seeks, and you do not heed the words of one in error but apply the zeal of one who corrects. Therefore one who wrongly gives what is no longer to be given, and violates the sacrament that has been given, is accused by his own error, not excused by that of the one who asks. Tell me, then, I beg you: how does he who asked it of you not have what he had already received through me? If it is because of “foreign water” and a “foreign fountain,” as those who do not understand are wont to say, since it is written, “Keep yourself from foreign water, and do not drink from a foreign fountain”: when Felicianus separated from you in the party of Maximian, he was being dragged along as “an adulterer of the truth, a chain of sacrilege,” as the words of your council declare. If he had carried off your fountain with him, what fountain was there in which you baptized your people after he had separated? But if he had baptized in a foreign fountain, why did you not rebaptize after him? For now your bishop sits together with Primian, whom he condemned and by whom he was condemned.

### Scripture references

- Prov 9:18: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Macrobius, Donatist bishop of Hippo. The text prints “a nobis” (“from us”) for Felicianus's separation; the sense requires “from you” (the Primianist Donatists), and it is so translated. “Keep yourself from foreign water …” is the Greek (LXX) addition to Prov 9:18, not in the Hebrew text. The quoted phrases are from the Donatist Council of Bagai (394) against Maximian and his supporters.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.1 (CSEL 34.2:612–613; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-1).

## Letter 108.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:613–614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns Macrobius's refusal to judge his predecessor against the Donatist demand that the whole church judge Caecilian.

### Latin text

Sed sicut mihi suis litteris intimarunt nostri, qui in hac causa te uiderunt, cum quaererent, quid hinc diceres, respondisti te nuper ordinatum factorum patris tui iudicem esse non posse, sed in eo, quod a prioribus tuis acceperis, permanere. hinc sane dolui necessitatem tuam, cum te existimem, sicut audio, bonae indolis iuuenem. quid enim te ad hanc responsionem nisi malae causae necessitas cogit? sed si adtendas, mi frater, si recte cogites, si deum timeas, in mala causa perseuerare nulla necessitas cogit. haec enim responsio tua non quaestionem tibi a me propositam soluit, sed causam nostram ab omni calumnia uestrae causationis absoluit. dicis enim te nuper ordinatum factorum patris tui iudicem esse non posse, sed in eo, quod a prioribus tuis acceperis, permanere. cur ergo non potius in ecclesia, quam scriptura teste incipientem ab Hierusalem ac per omnes gentes fructificantem atque crescentem a domino Christo per apostolos accepimus, permanemus et de factis nescio quorum patrum, quae ante paene centum annos admissa dicuntur, non iudicamur? si enim tu de patre tuo adhuc in hac uita constituto non audes iudicare, quem potes interrogare, mihi quare dicitur, ut iudicem de mortuo longe ante, quam natus sum? tot Christianis gentibus quare dicitur, ut iudicent de factis Afrorum traditorum ante tot annos mortuorum, quos nec uiuos tot Christiani, qui tunc uiuebant, in terris remotissimis constituti audire uel nosse potuerunt? qui manentem notum non audes iudicare Primianum, cur mihi antiquum et ignotum iudicandum uis inponere Caecilianum? si patres tuos non iudicas de factis suis, quare fratres tuos iudicas de factis alienis?

### English translation (Claude)

But, as our people who saw you about this matter informed me by letter, when they asked what you would say to this, you replied that, being newly ordained, you could not be a judge of the deeds of your father, but would abide in what you had received from your predecessors. At this I truly grieved over the constraint you are under, since I consider you, from what I hear, a young man of good character. For what forces you to this answer except the constraint of a bad cause? But if you pay attention, my brother, if you think rightly, if you fear God, no constraint forces anyone to persevere in a bad cause. For this reply of yours does not solve the question I put to you, but clears our cause of every slander of your accusations. You say that, being newly ordained, you cannot be a judge of the deeds of your father, but abide in what you received from your predecessors. Why then do we not rather abide in the church which, as Scripture testifies, beginning from Jerusalem and bearing fruit and growing through all nations, we received from the Lord Christ through the apostles, without being judged for the deeds of I know not what fathers, which are said to have been committed nearly a hundred years ago? For if you do not dare to judge your father, who is still alive and whom you can question, why am I told to judge one who died long before I was born? Why are so many Christian nations told to judge the deeds of African traditors who died so many years ago, whom so many Christians then living, situated in the most remote lands, could neither hear nor know even while they were alive? You who do not dare to judge Primian, who is still here and known, why do you want to lay on me the judging of Caecilian, long ago and unknown? If you do not judge your fathers for their own deeds, why do you judge your brothers for the deeds of others?

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:47: allusion, medium confidence
- Col 1:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Traditors”: those accused of handing over the Scriptures in the persecution of 303–305; the Donatist schism began with the charge that Caecilian of Carthage had been ordained by one.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.2 (CSEL 34.2:613–614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-2).

## Letter 108.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appeals to Isaiah's command to call one's haters brothers and protests that the Donatists divide Christ by men's names and exorcise his baptism.

### Latin text

An forte fratres nos negas? sed melius audimus sanctum spiritum per prophetam praecipientem: Audite, qui pauetis uerbum domini: Dicite fratres nostri estis his, qui uos oderunt et qui uos detestantur, ut nomen domini honorificetur et appareat illis in iucunditatem, ipsi autem erubescant. re uera enim si hominibus nomen domini iucundius esset quam nomina hominum, numquid Christus clamans: Pacem meam do uobis diuideretur in membris suis per eos, qui dicunt: Ego quidem sum Pauli ego autem Apollo ego uero Cephae et per hominum nomina dilaniantur? numquid Christus exsufflaretur in baptismo suo, de quo dictum est: Hic est. qui baptizat, de quo dictum est: Christus dilexit ecclesiam suam et tradidit se ipsum pro ea, ut eam sanctificaret mundans eam lauacro aquae in uerbo? numquid ergo in ipso suo lauacro exsufflaretur, si nomen domini esset iucundius, cuius est ipse baptismus, quam nomen hominum. de quibus dicitis: Sanctum est, quod ille dat, non quod ille?

### English translation (Claude)

Or perhaps you deny that we are brothers? But we do better to listen to the Holy Spirit commanding through the prophet: “Hear, you who tremble at the word of the Lord: say, ‘You are our brothers,’ to those who hate you and who detest you, that the name of the Lord may be honored and may appear to them in gladness; but let them be ashamed.” For truly, if the name of the Lord were more delightful to men than the names of men, would Christ, who cries out, “My peace I give to you,” be divided in his members by those who say, “I indeed am of Paul, but I of Apollos, and I of Cephas,” and would they be torn apart by the names of men? Would Christ be exorcised in his own baptism, of whom it was said, “This is he who baptizes,” of whom it was said, “Christ loved his church and gave himself up for it, that he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the washing of water in the word”? Would he, then, be exorcised in his own washing, if the name of the Lord, whose baptism it is, were more delightful than the name of men, of whom you say, “What this one gives is holy, not what that one gives”?

### Scripture references

- Isa 66:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:33: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:25: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 66:5 is quoted in its Greek (LXX) form. “Exorcised” renders exsufflaretur, the rite of breathing out against the devil before baptism, which the Donatists applied to Catholics who joined them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.3 (CSEL 34.2:614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-3).

## Letter 108.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:614–615
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises the Donatists' own acceptance of Felicianus's baptism and argues that Macrobius cannot refuse to judge Primian while judging the whole world for Caecilian.

### Latin text

Et tamen collegae tui, ubi uoluerunt, ueritatem potius adtenderunt et non solum baptismum, quem dedit Primianus in uestra communione, sed etiam quem dedit Felicianus in Maximiani sacrilego schismate, propter honoris domini iucunditatem sanctum esse senserunt et characterem, non solum quem ipse apud uos acceperat, sed etiam quem aliis extra uos desertor infixerat, ipso correcto uiolare non ausi sunt, quia regium cognouerunt. de hoc eorum facto tam bono iudicare non uis, ubi eos deberes laudabiliter imitari, et sequeris iudicium eorum, in quo merentur ab omnibus detestari. times de Primiano iudicare, ne cogaris audire, quod culpes; immo uero iudica et illic magis poteris inuenire, quod laudes. non enim, quod male fecit Primianus, te uoluimus memorare, sed quod optime fecit, qui in suscipiendis, quos eius damnator in separatione sceleratissima baptizauerat, errorem hominum correxit, non dei sacramenta destruxit, bonum Christi et in hominibus malignis agnouit, malum autem hominum non uiolato Christi bono emendauit. aut si hoc factum displicet tibi, illud saltem adtende, illud pro tuo bono ingenio prudenter aduerte, quia unum Primianum non iudicas de factis ipsis Primiani et orbem Christianum iudicas de factis Caeciliani. times, ne te polluat, si noueris, quod uindicare non audeas; absolue ergo gentes, quae nec nosse poterant, quod accusas.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet your colleagues, when they wished, paid attention rather to the truth, and judged holy, for the sake of the gladness of the Lord's honor, not only the baptism that Primian gave in your communion but also that which Felicianus gave in the sacrilegious schism of Maximian; and once he had been corrected they did not dare to violate the mark, not only the one he himself had received among you but also the one he had imprinted on others outside you as a deserter, because they recognized it as royal. You do not want to judge this deed of theirs, so good, in which you ought to imitate them to your credit; and you follow their judgment in the thing for which they deserve to be detested by all. You fear to judge Primian, lest you be compelled to hear something you would blame; on the contrary, judge, and there you will rather be able to find something to praise. For we did not want you to call to mind what Primian did badly but what he did excellently: in receiving those whom his own condemner had baptized in a most wicked separation, he corrected the error of men and did not destroy the sacraments of God; he recognized the good of Christ even in malicious men, and amended the evil of men without violating the good of Christ. Or if this deed displeases you, at least attend to this, and consider it prudently, as your good mind should: you do not judge the one man Primian for Primian's own deeds, and yet you judge the Christian world for the deeds of Caecilian. You fear that it would pollute you to know what you dare not punish; then acquit the nations, which could not even know what you allege.

### Translation notes

- “Mark” renders characterem, the indelible seal of baptism, compared to a royal brand.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.4 (CSEL 34.2:614–615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-4).

## Letter 108.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:615–617
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how the Council of Bagai condemned Maximian and his ordainers, yet the Donatists later received Felicianus and Praetextatus in their honors without rebaptizing those they had baptized.

### Latin text

Nec tamen illud unius Primiani factum est; scis, in quantum opinor, et tu: centum ferme episcopi uestri factione damnabili cum Maximiano conspirantes ausi sunt damnare Primianum et trecentorum decem Bagaiensi concilio, sicut decreti eius uerba personant, Maximianum fidei aemulum, ueritatis adulterum, ecclesiae matris inimicum, Dathan, Core et Abiron ministrum, de pacis gremio sententiae fulmen excussit, huic alii duodecim, qui eius ordinationi, quando contra Primianum leuatus est, interfuerant, non dilata damnatione coniuncti sunt, ceteris autem, ne nimia praecisio fieret, praestituto die redeundi est concessa dilatio saluis suis honoribus, si intra temporis terminum remeassent. nec timuerunt trecenti et decem ad suum collegium reuocare tanto Maximiani sacrilegio accusatos intuentes forte, quod scriptum est: Caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum. quia, ut et permittatur tempus dilationis,................................, foris a uestra communione baptizauerunt, quoscumque baptizare potuerunt; neque enim, foris nisi fuissent, dilatione concessa inuitari poterant, ut redirent. deinde et ante, quam dilatio finiretur, et postea, quam finita est, illi duodecim cum Maximiano damnati apud tres aut amplius proconsules accusati sunt, ut e sedibus suis iudiciario uigore pellantur. inter quos erat Felicianus Mustitanus, de quo nunc ago, et Praetextatus Assuritanus nuper defunctus, in cuius damnati loco alter iam fuerat ordinatus. quos duos non unus Primianus sed multi coepiscopi uestri, cum frequentissima numerositate Tamugadensis Optati natalicia celebrarent, post eorum sine dilatione damnationem, post terminatam, quae ceteris data fuerat, dilationem, post diuulgatam forensi etiam strepitu apud tot consules accusationem in honoribus integris susceperunt et post eos nullum baptizauerunt. si huic assertioni resistitur uel horum aliquid si negatur, periculo episcopatus mei exigar probare, quod loquor.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor was that the act of Primian alone; you know it too, I think. Nearly a hundred of your bishops, conspiring with Maximian in a damnable faction, dared to condemn Primian; and the Council of Bagai of three hundred and ten, as the words of its decree proclaim, “struck from the bosom of peace with the thunderbolt of its sentence Maximian, rival of the faith, adulterer of the truth, enemy of mother church, minister of Dathan, Korah, and Abiram.” Twelve others, who had been present at his ordination when he was set up against Primian, were joined to him in condemnation without delay; to the rest, lest the cutting off be too great, a delay was granted, with a fixed day for returning, their honors preserved if they came back within the time limit. Nor did the three hundred and ten fear to recall to their college men accused of so great a sacrilege as Maximian's, looking perhaps to what is written: “Love covers a multitude of sins.” Because, even granting that the period of delay be allowed, … they baptized outside your communion whomever they could baptize; for unless they had been outside, they could not have been invited to return when the delay was granted. Then, both before the delay ended and after it ended, those twelve condemned with Maximian were accused before three or more proconsuls, so that they might be driven from their sees by the force of the courts. Among them were Felicianus of Musti, of whom I am now treating, and Praetextatus of Assuras, lately deceased, in whose place, as a condemned man, another had already been ordained. These two were received with their honors intact, not by Primian alone but by many of your fellow bishops, when they were celebrating with a great crowd the anniversary of Optatus of Thamugadi; this after their condemnation without delay, after the end of the delay given to the others, after the accusation had been published, with all the clamor of the courts, before so many consuls; and they rebaptized no one after them. If this assertion is resisted, or if any of these things is denied, I shall be required, at the risk of my episcopate, to prove what I say.

### Scripture references

- Num 16:1: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The row of dots marks a gap in the printed text; nothing is supplied. The quotation is from the decree of the Donatist Council of Bagai (394). “Consuls” (consules) refers to the same proconsular hearings named just before.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.5 (CSEL 34.2:615–617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-5).

## Letter 108.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:617–619
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Donatists' proof texts on baptism one by one, showing that their own reception of the Maximianists refutes each.

### Latin text

Finita est causa, frater Macrobi; deus hoc egit, deus hoc uoluit; occultae illius prouidentiae fuit, ut in causa Maximiani speculum uobis correctionis propinaretur, ut omnis aduersum nos, immo aduersus Christi ecclesiam toto orbe crescentem non dico uestra, ne in te uidear contumeliosus, sed certe uestrorum criminosa calumnia finiretur. nihil enim remansit omnino eorum, quae contra nos tamquam de scripturis ab hominibus non intellegentibus proferri solent. nam haec habere in ore consueuerunt: Ab aqua aliena abstine te; sed respondetur: Non est aqua aliena, quamuis sit in alienis, sicut nec aqua illa Maximiani fuit, unde uos non abstinuistis. item proponitur nobis: Facti sunt mihi sicut aqua mendax non habens fidem; sed respondetur: Hoc dictum est de fictis hominibus non pertinentibus ad dei sacramenta, quae nec in mendacibus possunt esse mendacia. nam utique mendaces fuerunt, qui Primianum, sicut ipsi perhibetis, falsis criminibus damnauerunt, nec tamen aqua mendax fuit, in qua separati a uobis, quos potuerunt, baptizauerunt. nam quando eam in his, quos Felicianus et Praetextatus foris baptizauerunt, suscepistis, etiam in mendacibus ueracem fuisse sensistis. proponitur nobis: Qui baptizatur a mortuo, quid prodest lauacrum eius? respondetur: Si hoc de baptismo scriptum est, quo baptizant illi, quos tamquam mortuos eiecit ecclesia, non dixit hoc lauacrum non esse, sed nihil prodesse, quod et nos dicimus. uerum tamen quando cum illo ad ecclesiam uenerit, quod foris oberat, intus proderit, non cum ipse repetitur baptismus, sed cum corrigitur baptizatus, sicut Maximianum et socios eius tamquam mortuos a uestra congregatione communionis eiectos loquitur Bagaiense concilium: Veridica, inquit, funda in asperos scopulos nonnullorum naufraga proiecta sunt membra; Aegyptiorum admodum exemplo pereuntium funeribus plena sunt litora, quibus in ipsa morte maior est poena, quod post extortam aquis ultricibus animam nec ipsam inueniunt sepulturam). ex hac turba mortuorum quasi reuiuiscentes Felicianum et Praetextatum in suis honoribus suscepistis et ab eis in illa morte baptizatos non rebaptizastis, quia baptismum Christi foris datum per mortuos mortuis non prodesse, eundem tamen ipsum prodesse intus reuiuiscentibus agnouistis. proponitur nobis: Oleum peccatoris non inpinguet caput meum; respondetur hoc scriptum de assentatione leni atque fallaci blandi adulatoris intellegi, quia unguitur et crescit eis caput, cum laudantur peccatores in desideriis animae suae et, qui iniqua egerint, benedicentur. quod ex priore uersu satis apparet; sic enim posita est tota sententia: Emendabit me iustus in misericordia et arguet me; oleum autem peccatoris non inpinguabit caput meum. malle se dixit ueraci misericordis austeritate compesci quam deceptoria laude fallentis extolli. sed quo modo libet hoc intellegatis, certe in eis, quos in sacrilegio Maximiani Felicianus et Praetextatus baptizauerunt, aut peccatorum oleum suscepistis aut etiam peccatoribus ministrantibus datum Christi esse oleum cognouistis; neque enim non erant peccatores, quando de illis in Bagaiensi concilio dicebatur: Famosi criminis reos, qui funesto opere perditionis uas sordidum collecta faeculentia glutinarunt, damnatos esse cognoscite.

### English translation (Claude)

The case is finished, brother Macrobius. God has done this, God has willed this; it was the work of his hidden providence that in the case of Maximian a mirror for correction should be held up to you, so that all the slanderous accusation against us, or rather against the church of Christ growing throughout the whole world, might be ended: I do not say yours, lest I seem insulting to you, but certainly that of your people. For nothing at all is left of the things which men who do not understand the Scriptures are wont to bring against us as if from them. They are accustomed to have this in their mouths: “Keep yourself from foreign water”; but the answer is: water is not foreign even when it is among strangers, just as that water of Maximian was not, from which you did not keep yourselves. Again it is put to us: “They have become to me like lying water that has no faithfulness”; but the answer is: this was said of feigned men who do not pertain to the sacraments of God, which cannot be lies even in liars. For certainly those were liars who condemned Primian, as you yourselves assert, on false charges; and yet the water in which, separated from you, they baptized whom they could was not lying. For when you received it in those whom Felicianus and Praetextatus baptized outside, you judged that it had been truthful even among liars. It is put to us: “He who is baptized by a dead man, what does his washing profit?” The answer is: if this was written of the baptism with which those baptize whom the church has cast out as dead, it did not say that this washing is not a washing, but that it profits nothing, which we also say. Nevertheless, when he comes with it to the church, what harmed him outside will profit him inside, not when baptism itself is repeated but when the baptized person is corrected. So the Council of Bagai speaks of Maximian and his companions as dead men cast out of the fellowship of your congregation: “By the truth-telling sling,” it says, “the shipwrecked limbs of some have been hurled onto the rough rocks; after the example of the Egyptians who perished, the shores are full of their corpses; for them in death itself the punishment is greater, that after their souls have been wrung from them by the avenging waters they do not find even burial.” Out of this crowd of the dead you received Felicianus and Praetextatus in their honors as men returning to life, and you did not rebaptize those whom they had baptized in that death, because you recognized that the baptism of Christ given outside by the dead does not profit the dead, yet that the same baptism does profit those who return to life inside. It is put to us: “Let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head.” The answer is that this is to be understood as written of the smooth and deceitful flattery of a fawning flatterer, because their head is anointed and swells when sinners are praised in the desires of their soul and those who have done wicked things are blessed. This is quite clear from the preceding line, for the whole sentence is set out thus: “The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me; but the oil of the sinner will not anoint my head.” He said that he preferred to be restrained by the truthful severity of one who is merciful than to be extolled by the deceitful praise of one who deceives. But however you may understand it, certainly in those whom Felicianus and Praetextatus baptized in the sacrilege of Maximian you either received the oil of sinners or recognized that the oil given even by sinners as ministers is Christ's; for they were certainly sinners when it was said of them at the Council of Bagai: “Know that those guilty of a notorious crime are condemned, who by a deadly work of perdition have glued together a filthy vessel out of collected dregs.”

### Scripture references

- Jer 15:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 10:3 (9:24 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Exod 14:30: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 34:25 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jer 15:18; “He who is baptized by a dead man” is Sir 34:25 (Vulgate 34:30), which speaks of washing after touching a corpse; Ps 141:5 (LXX 140:5) and Ps 10:3 (LXX 9:24). The two quotations are from the decree of the Donatist Council of Bagai (394).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.6 (CSEL 34.2:617–619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-6).

## Letter 108.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:619
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Donatist texts on separation: one shares in others' sins by consent, not by bodily communion, as the parable of the net shows.

### Latin text

Ista de baptismo dixisse suffecerit. causa uero separationis uestrae his solet non intellectis testimoniis colorari. scriptum est: Ne communices peccatis alienis; sed respondetur eum communicare peccatis alienis, qui consentit malis factis, non eum, qui, cum ipse sit triticum, simul tamen cum palea, quam diu area trituratur, diuinis communicat sacramentis. scriptum est enim: Exite inde et inmundum ne tetigeritis et: Qui tetigerit pollutum, pollutus est, sed consensione uoluntatis, qua deceptus est homo primus, non conuersatione corporis, qua et Iudas osculatus est Christum; pisces quippe illi, de quibus in euangelio dominus loquitur, boni et mali intra eadem retia, quibus congregationis coaptat unitatem. usque ad finem saeculi, quod litoris nomine praefiguratur, pariter natant corporibus mixti sed moribus separati. scriptum est enim: Modicum fermentum totam massam corrumpit, sed eorum, qui consentiunt mala facientibus, non eorum, qui secundum prophetam Ezechielem gemunt et maerent ob iniquitates populi dei, quae fiunt in medio eorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Let what has been said about baptism suffice. But the cause of your separation is usually given color by these testimonies, misunderstood. It is written: “Do not share in other men's sins”; but the answer is that he shares in other men's sins who consents to evil deeds, not he who, being himself wheat, nevertheless shares in the divine sacraments together with the chaff as long as the threshing floor is being threshed. It is written also: “Go out from there and touch no unclean thing,” and: “Whoever touches what is polluted is polluted”; but by consent of the will, by which the first man was deceived, not by bodily association, in which Judas too kissed Christ. For those fish of which the Lord speaks in the gospel, good and bad within the same nets, by which he fits together the unity of the congregation, swim together until the end of the age, which is prefigured by the name of the shore, mixed in body but separated in conduct. It is written also: “A little leaven corrupts the whole lump”; but this concerns those who consent to evildoers, not those who, according to the prophet Ezekiel, groan and mourn over the iniquities of the people of God that are done in their midst.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 5:22: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 52:11: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:17: quotation, medium confidence
- Num 19:22: allusion, low confidence
- Hag 2:13: allusion, low confidence
- Matt 26:49: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 9:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Whoever touches what is polluted is polluted” is not an exact quotation; cf. Num 19:22 and Hag 2:13 (identification uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.7 (CSEL 34.2:619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-7).

## Letter 108.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:619–620
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Daniel, the three young men, the prophets, the apostles with Judas, and Paul as examples of the righteous who tolerated the wicked without separating.

### Latin text

Istam malorum permixtionem gemit et Danihel, tres quoque uiri gemuerunt; ille hoc in oratione, illi in fornace testantur; nec tamen se ab unitate populi, cuius peccata confitebantur, corporali disiunctione separauerunt. prophetae omnes in eundem populum, in quo erant, quae et quanta dixerint! nec sibi tamen alterum populum, in quo essent, discessione corporali uel segregatione quaesierunt. ipsi apostoli permixtum sibi diabolum Iudam usque in finem, quo se ipse etiam laqueo perdidit, sine ulla sui contaminatione tolerarunt, ita ut diceret eis dominus propter illius inter eos praesentiam: Et uos mundi estis sed non omnes. nec ob illius inmunditiam tamquam fermento in eis dissimilium morum massa corrupta est. nec recto adfirmari potest, quod eos illius latebat nequitia, nisi forte qua fuerat etiam dominum traditurus; nam ipsi de illo scripserunt, quod fur erat et omnia, quae mittebantur, de dominicis loculis auferebat. non eis quisquam calumniabatur illo testimonio: Videbatis furem et concurrebatis cum eo; et factis enim malorum non sacramentorum communione sed eorundem factorum consensione concurritur. apostolus Paulus quanta de falsis fratribus conqueritur! quorum tamen corporali permixtione non maculabatur cordis puri diuersitate seiunctus. nam a quibusdam. quos inuidos nouerat, gaudet Christum pariter praedicari: utique inuidia diabolicum uitium est.

### English translation (Claude)

Daniel too laments this mixture of the wicked, and the three men also lamented it; he testifies to it in his prayer, they in the furnace; and yet they did not separate themselves by bodily disjunction from the unity of the people whose sins they confessed. The prophets, all of them: what things, and how great, they said against the very people among whom they were! And yet they did not seek for themselves another people to be among by bodily departure or segregation. The apostles themselves endured without any contamination of their own the devil Judas mingled among them until the end, when he destroyed himself with a noose, so that the Lord said to them on account of his presence among them: “And you are clean, but not all.” Nor was the lump of their unlike conduct corrupted by his uncleanness as by leaven. Nor can it rightly be asserted that his wickedness was hidden from them, except perhaps that by which he was going to betray even the Lord; for they themselves wrote of him that he was a thief and carried off everything that was put into the Lord's purse. No one slandered them with that testimony, “You saw a thief and ran along with him”; for one runs along with the deeds of the wicked not by communion in the sacraments but by consent to those same deeds. The apostle Paul, how much he complains of false brothers! Yet he was not stained by bodily mingling with them, being separated from them by the difference of a pure heart. For he rejoices that Christ is preached alike even by certain men whom he knew to be envious; and envy is certainly a devilish vice.

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 27:5: allusion, high confidence
- John 6:70: allusion, medium confidence
- John 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 50:18 (49:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:26: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 1:15: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 1:18: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pr Azar 1-22 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The three men's lament in the furnace is in the Greek additions to Daniel (Prayer of Azariah 1–22).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.8 (CSEL 34.2:619–620; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-8).

## Letter 108.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:620–621
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Cyprian, whom the Donatists cite for rebaptism, loved unity above all and was purified by martyrdom within it.

### Latin text

Postremo episcopus Cyprianus iam ecclesia copiosius dilatata uicinior temporibus nostris, cuius auctoritate aliquando repetitionem baptismi confirmare conamini, cum illud concilium uel illa scripta, si uere ipsius sunt et non, sicut aliqui putant, sub eius nomine conscripta atque conficta, ipsa contineant. quantum dilexerit unitatem, quo modo in ea tolerandos, etiam contra quos sentiebat, apertissima exhortatione consuluerit. ne pacis uinculum rumperetur, id potissimum adtendens. quia, si quis alterutris, quibus aliud uidetur, quam ueritas habet, humanus error inrepserit, fraterna concordia custodita caritas cooperit etiam multitudinem peccatorum: hanc ille sic tenuit, sic amauit, ut, si quid aliter, quam res est, de baptismi sacramento sapuerat, id quoque deus illi reuelaret, sicut apostolus fratribus in caritate ambulantibus dicit: Quotquot ergo perfecti, hoc sapiamus; et si quid aliter sapitis, id quoque uobis deus reuelabit. uerum tamen in quod peruenimus, in eo et ambulemus. huc accedit, quoniam fructuosum sarmentum, si aliquid habebat adhuc purgandum, etiam gloriosa martyrii falce purgatum est, non quia pro Christi nomine occisus est, sed quia pro Christi nomine in gremio unitatis occisus est. nam ipse scripsit et fidentissime adserit eos, qui extra unitatem etiamsi pro illo nomine moriantur. occidi posse, non posse coronari. tantum ualet siue ad delenda siue ad confirmanda peccata uel custodita uel uiolata caritas unitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, Bishop Cyprian, nearer our own times, when the church had already spread more widely, by whose authority you sometimes try to confirm the repetition of baptism, since that council or those writings contain it, if they are really his and not, as some think, composed and fabricated under his name: how much he loved unity, how in the plainest exhortation he counseled that within it even those with whom he disagreed should be tolerated, lest the bond of peace be broken, attending above all to this, that if some human error should creep into either side among those who think otherwise than the truth is, brotherly concord being kept, love covers even a multitude of sins. This love he so held and so loved that, if he had thought anything about the sacrament of baptism otherwise than it is, God would reveal this also to him, as the apostle says to brothers walking in love: “Let as many of us, then, as are perfect think this; and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you. Nevertheless, where we have arrived, there let us walk.” Add to this that the fruitful branch, if it still had anything to be pruned, was pruned by the glorious knife of martyrdom; not because he was killed for the name of Christ, but because he was killed for the name of Christ in the bosom of unity. For he himself wrote, and asserts most confidently, that those who are outside unity, even if they die for that name, can be killed but cannot be crowned. So great is the power of the love of unity, whether kept or violated, either to blot out sins or to confirm them.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:3: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Unit. eccl. 14 (On the Unity of the Catholic Church): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine reports a doubt held by some about the authenticity of Cyprian's council and letters on rebaptism without endorsing it. The saying that those outside unity can be killed but not crowned is in Cyprian, On the Unity of the Church 14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.9 (CSEL 34.2:620–621; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-9).

## Letter 108.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:621–622
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that Cyprian rebuked greedy colleagues without separating from them and taught that the church must not be deserted because of the tares in it.

### Latin text

Ipse ergo ille Cyprianus cum per impiorum gentilium persecutionem uastata ecclesia multos plangeret lapsos malis hoc moribus tribuens eorum, qui in ipsa ecclesia damnabili conuersatione uiuebant, de collegarum suorum moribus gemit nec suum gemitum silentio tegit, sed dicit eos in tantam cupiditatem fuisse progressos, ut esurientibus etiam in ecclesia fratribus habere argentum largiter uellent, fundos insidiosis fraudibus raperent, usuris multiplicantibus faenus augerent). puto istorum auaritia, rapinis et faenore Cyprianum non fuisse maculatum nec tamen ab eis corporali segregatione sed uitae dissimilitudine fuisse disiunctum. cum eis altare tetigit, sed inmundam illorum uitam ille non tetigit, quando sic culpauit atque arguit. placentia ista quippe tanguntur, displicentia repelluntur. ideoque illi optimo episcopo nec censura, qua peccata coherceret, nec cautela defuit, qua unitatis uinculum custodiret. legitur eius in quadam epistula, quam scripsit ad presbyterum Maximum, de hac re clara et aperta sententia, qua omnino praecepit propheticam regulam tenens nullo modo ecclesiae deseri debere unitatem propter malorum permixtionem. nam etsi uidentur, inquit, in ecclesia esse zizania, non tamen impediri debet fides aut caritas nostra, ut, quoniam esse zizania in ecclesia cernimus, nos de ecclesia recedamus. tantum modo nobis laborandum est, ut frumentum esse possimus.

### English translation (Claude)

That same Cyprian, then, when the church had been laid waste by the persecution of the impious heathen and he was lamenting the many who had lapsed, attributing this to the evil conduct of those who were living a damnable life within the church itself, groans over the conduct of his colleagues, and does not cover his groaning with silence, but says that they had advanced to such greed that, while brothers in the church were starving, they wanted to have silver in abundance, seized estates by treacherous frauds, and increased their gains by multiplying usury. I think that Cyprian was not stained by these men's avarice, robberies, and usury, and yet that he was separated from them not by bodily segregation but by unlikeness of life. He touched the altar with them, but he did not touch their unclean life, since he censured and rebuked it as he did. For what pleases is touched; what displeases is pushed away. And so that excellent bishop lacked neither the censure by which to restrain sins nor the caution by which to guard the bond of unity. In a letter of his which he wrote to the presbyter Maximus, there is a clear and plain judgment on this matter, in which, holding to the prophetic rule, he enjoined that in no way ought the unity of the church to be deserted because of the mixture of the wicked. “For although,” he says, “there seem to be tares in the church, yet our faith or our love ought not to be hindered, so that, because we see that there are tares in the church, we ourselves should withdraw from the church. We must only labor that we may be wheat.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:24: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 6 (On the Lapsed): allusion, high confidence
- Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Letters): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The greed of the bishops is described in Cyprian, On the Lapsed 6; the letter is Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Hartel), addressed to Maximus and other confessors.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.10 (CSEL 34.2:621–622; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-10).

## Letter 108.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:622–624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Cyprian's warning that only the Lord may separate wheat from tares, and that those who presume to do so perish from the church.

### Latin text

Istam caritatis legem ex ore Christi domini promulgatam — ipsius enim sunt istae similitudines et de zizaniis usque ad tempus messis in unitate agri per mundum et de malis piscibus usque ad tempus litoris intra eadem retia tolerandis hanc ergo caritatis legem si maiores uestri mente retinerent, si cum dei timore cogitarent non propter Caecilianum et nescio quos Afros siue, ut putatis, re uera criminosos siue, quod magis credendum est, calumniis appetitos se ab ecclesia, quam descripsit ipse Cyprianus per omnes gentes radios suos porrigere et ramos suos per omnem terram copia ubertatis extendere, non, inquam, se a tot gentibus Christianis, quae omnino nescierunt, qui uel quid uel quibus obiciebant, nefaria separatione discinderent, quod non fit nisi aut simultate priuata potius quam utilitate communi aut illo uitio, quod consequenter Cyprianus ipse conumerat uitandumque commemorat. nam cum praecepisset propter zizania, quae in ecclesia cernuntur, non esse ecclesiam deserendam, sequitur et adiungit: Nobis tantum modo laborandum est, ut frumentum esse possimus, ut. cum coeperit frumentum dominicis horreis condi, fructum pro opere nostro et labore capiamus. apostolus in epistula sua dicit: In domo autem magna non solum sunt uasa aurea et argentea sed et lignea et fictilia et quaedam quidem honorata quaedam inhonorata. nos operam demus et, quantum possumus, laboremus, ut uas aureum et argenteum simus. ceterum fictilia uasa confringere domino soli licitum est, cui et uirga ferrea data est. esse non potest maior domino suo seruus nec quisquam sibi, quod soli filio pater tribuit, uindicarit, ut se putet aut ad aream uentilandam et purgandam palam et uentilabrum etiam ferre posse aut a frumento uniuersa zizania humano iudicio separare. superba est ista praesumptio et sacrilega obstinatio, quam sibi furor prauus adsumit, et, dum sibi semper aliquid amplius, quam mitis iustitia deposcit, adsumunt, de ecclesia pereunt et, dum se insolenter extollunt, ipso suo tumore caecati ueritatis lumen amittunt.

### English translation (Claude)

This law of love was promulgated from the mouth of Christ the Lord; for these similitudes are his, both of the tares to be tolerated in the unity of the field throughout the world until the time of harvest, and of the bad fish within the same nets until the time of the shore. If, then, your forefathers had kept this law of love in mind, if they had reflected with the fear of God, they would not, on account of Caecilian and I know not what Africans, whether really criminal, as you think, or, as is rather to be believed, assailed by slanders, have cut themselves off by a wicked separation from the church which Cyprian himself described as extending its rays through all nations and spreading its branches through all the earth with abundant fruitfulness; not, I say, from so many Christian nations, which knew nothing at all of who was making the charges, or what, or against whom. That is not done except either from private enmity rather than common benefit, or from that vice which Cyprian himself names next and warns must be avoided. For having enjoined that the church is not to be deserted because of the tares seen in it, he continues and adds: “We must only labor that we may be wheat, so that when the wheat begins to be stored in the Lord's barns, we may receive fruit for our work and labor. The apostle says in his letter: ‘But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver but also of wood and earthenware, some for honor and some for dishonor.’ Let us take pains and labor as much as we can to be a vessel of gold and silver. But to break the earthen vessels is permitted to the Lord alone, to whom also the rod of iron has been given. The servant cannot be greater than his lord, nor may anyone claim for himself what the Father has granted to the Son alone, so as to think that he can either carry the shovel and the fan to winnow and purge the threshing floor, or separate all the tares from the wheat by human judgment. That is proud presumption and sacrilegious obstinacy, which depraved fury takes upon itself; and while they always take upon themselves something more than gentle justice demands, they perish from the church, and while they insolently exalt themselves, blinded by their own swelling they lose the light of truth.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:20: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 2:27: allusion, medium confidence
- John 13:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Unit. eccl. 5 (On the Unity of the Catholic Church): allusion, high confidence
- Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Letters): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The image of the church's rays and branches is from Cyprian, On the Unity of the Church 5; the long quotation is Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Hartel).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.11 (CSEL 34.2:622–624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-11).

## Letter 108.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that those who leave the church's unity in the name of their own righteousness are themselves the tares and chaff.

### Latin text

Quid hac Cypriani adtestatione clarius, quid ueracius? uides, quanta euangelica et apostolica luce praefulgeat; uides eos, qui uelut offensi pro sua iustitia iniquitatibus alienis ecclesiae deserunt unitatem, ipsos esse potius iniquissimos; uides foris esse zizania eos, qui noluerunt in unitate agri dominici zizania tolerare; uides foris esse paleam eos, qui noluerunt in unitate domus magnae talia tolerare; uides, quam ueraciter scriptum est: Filius malus ipse se iustum dicit, exitum autem suum non abluit; exitum scilicet. quo exit de ecclesia, non purgat, non excusat, non defendit, non purum et sine crimine ostendit; hoc est enim non abluit quia, si non se ipsum iustum diceret, sed uere ac legitime iustus esset, non bonos propter malos impiissime desereret, sed malos propter bonos patientissime sustineret, donec ipse dominus siue per se siue per angelos suos a tritico zizania, a frumentis paleas, a uasis misericordiae uasa irae et haedos ab ouibus, pisces malos a bonis in fine saeculi separaret.

### English translation (Claude)

What is clearer, what truer, than this testimony of Cyprian? You see with how great a light of the gospel and the apostles it shines; you see that those who, as if offended on behalf of their own righteousness by the iniquities of others, desert the unity of the church, are themselves rather the most iniquitous; you see that those are tares outside who would not tolerate tares in the unity of the Lord's field; you see that those are chaff outside who would not tolerate such things in the unity of the great house; you see how truly it is written: “A wicked son calls himself righteous, but does not wash away his going out.” His going out, that is, by which he goes out of the church, he does not cleanse, does not excuse, does not defend, does not show to be pure and blameless; for this is what “does not wash away” means. For if he did not call himself righteous, but were truly and rightly righteous, he would not most impiously desert the good on account of the wicked, but would most patiently bear with the wicked for the sake of the good, until the Lord himself, either by himself or by his angels, should separate the tares from the wheat, the chaff from the grain, the vessels of wrath from the vessels of mercy, the goats from the sheep, and the bad fish from the good at the end of the age.

### Scripture references

- Prov 30:12: quotation, medium confidence
- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:32: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:49: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “A wicked son calls himself righteous …” is the Greek (LXX) form of a proverb (Prov 24 in the LXX order; cf. Prov 30:12).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.12 (CSEL 34.2:624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-12).

## Letter 108.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:624–627
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Donatists' lenient treatment of the Maximianists refutes their claim that the whole world was polluted by Caecilian.

### Latin text

Sed si testimonia illa scripturarum, quae maiores uestri a ad diuidendum populum dei uel intellegenda uel proferenda crediderunt, aliter, quam diuinorum eloquiorum sensus postulat, accipere conamini, iam desinite; adtendite illud speculum, quod ad uos admonendos deus misericordissima, si sapietis, prouisione constituit. causam dico Feliciani, fidei aemulum, ueritatis adulterum, ecclesiae matris, sicut in Bagaiensi concilio conclamatum est, inimicum, Dathan, Core et Abiron ministrum, de quo amplius addiderunt, quod eum aperta terra non absorbuit, ad maius supplicium super his reseruasse; raptus enim, inquiunt, poenam suam compendio lucrauerat funeris; usuras nunc grauioris colligit funeris, cum mortuus interest uiuis. quaero enim: utrum istum tunc inmundum mortuum tetigerunt illi, qui cum eo conspirantes Primiani innocentiam damnauerunt? si enim tetigerunt, utique pollutum tangendo polluti sunt. cur ergo in eiusdem communione constitutis atque a uestra separatis nec tamquam innocentibus dilatio redeundi conceditur. ut integri honoris ac fidei regressi habeant fundamenta et, qui tantum ordinationi Maximiani non interfuerunt, mereantur audire, quod eos sacrilegi surculi non polluere plantaria in eadem parte positos, in eodem schismate conligatos, a uobis diuisos, illis sociatos, simul in Africa constitutos, notissimos, amicissimos, coniunctissimos, qui, etsi non praesentes eum ordinauerunt, propter eum tamen etiam absentem Primianum damnauerunt, et inquinasse dicitur surculus Caeciliani orbis terrarum populos Christianos numerosissimos. remotissimos, ignotissimos, cuius non dico causam sed multi nec nomen nosse potuerunt? non communicant peccatis alienis, qui peccatum Maximiani non solum scierunt, sed etiam contra Primianum leuando erexerunt, et communicant peccatis alienis, qui Caecilianum episcopum factum aut in longinquis gentibus nescierunt aut in propinquioribus tantum modo audierunt aut in ipsa Africa factum simpliciter et pacifice cognouerunt aut in ipsa Carthagine contra neminem......... iam fuerat, leuauerunt! nec cum fure concurrebant, qui communicabant ei, de quo dicit Nummasius aduocatus loquens pro praesente Restituto episcopo uestro, quod per occultum sacrilegii propemodum furtum episcopalis nominis inuaserit principatum, nec cum adultero portionem suam ponebant, qui communicabant ueritatis adultero, nec modico fermento tota eorum massa corrumpebatur, cum ei fauerent, cum in eius parte non quasi nescientes a uobis praecisi remanerent, sed a uobis contra uos praecidendam erigendamque curarent; deinde uos ipsi, quod eos ad redeundum sic inuitastis, ut Maximiano tanta societate coniunctos inpollutos a sacrilegii surculo diceretis, quod Praetextatum quoque et Felicianum saluis eorum honoribus suscepistis, quod cum eis pacifice concordatis, quod hodieque Felicianum uobiscum considentem uidetis, nulla communione peccatorum alienorum maculati. nullo contactu inmunditiae coinquinati, nullius estis malignitatis fermento corrupti, et orbi Christiano per haec testimonia alienum crimen obicitur, unitatis diuisio a separatione funesta defenditur, a praeciso ramo tamquam inmundus ramus, qui in uerae matris radice manserit, accusatur!

### English translation (Claude)

But if you try to take those testimonies of the Scriptures, which your forefathers believed should be understood or brought forward to divide the people of God, otherwise than the sense of the divine oracles demands, stop now; look at that mirror which God, if you will be wise, has set up by a most merciful provision to admonish you. I mean the case of Felicianus, “rival of the faith, adulterer of the truth, enemy of mother church, minister of Dathan, Korah, and Abiram,” as was proclaimed at the Council of Bagai; of whom they further added that the earth had not opened and swallowed him up so that he might be reserved for a greater punishment above it. “For had he been snatched away,” they say, “he would have gained his punishment by the shortcut of death; now he collects the interest of a heavier death, since being dead he is present among the living.” For I ask: did those who, conspiring with him, condemned the innocence of Primian then touch this unclean dead man? If they touched him, then by touching what was polluted they were certainly polluted. Why then is a delay for returning granted, as though to innocent men, to those established in his communion and separated from yours, so that on their return they may have the foundations of honor and faith intact? And why do those who merely were not present at Maximian's ordination deserve to hear that “the shoots of the sacrilegious sapling” did not pollute them, though they were placed in the same party, bound in the same schism, divided from you, allied with them, living together in Africa, very well known, very friendly, very closely joined to them, men who, though not present to ordain him, nevertheless for his sake condemned Primian even in his absence; and yet the sapling of Caecilian is said to have defiled the Christian peoples of the whole world, most numerous, most remote, most unknown, many of whom could know, I do not say his case, but not even his name? They do not share in others' sins who not only knew the sin of Maximian but even raised it up by setting him up against Primian; and they do share in others' sins who in distant nations did not know that Caecilian had been made bishop, or in nearer ones only heard of it, or in Africa itself knew of it simply and peaceably, or in Carthage itself set him up against no one … had already been! Nor did they run with a thief who communicated with the man of whom the advocate Nummasius, speaking for your bishop Restitutus in his presence, says that “by a hidden, almost a theft of sacrilege, he seized the primacy of the episcopal name”; nor did they put in their portion with an adulterer who communicated with the adulterer of the truth; nor was their whole lump corrupted by a little leaven when they favored him, when they remained in his party not as men cut off from you unknowingly, but took care that he be cut off from you and set up against you. And then you yourselves, because you invited them to return in such terms that you said that men joined in such close fellowship with Maximian were unpolluted by the sacrilegious sapling, because you received Praetextatus and Felicianus with their honors preserved, because you live in peaceful concord with them, because today you see Felicianus sitting with you: you are stained by no communion in others' sins, defiled by no contact with uncleanness, corrupted by the leaven of no malice; and yet by these testimonies the crime of another is laid against the Christian world, the division of unity is defended by a deadly separation, and the branch that has remained in the root of the true mother is accused as unclean by the branch that has been cut off!

### Scripture references

- Num 16:31: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 50:18 (49:18 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotations are from the decree of the Donatist Council of Bagai (394) and from the court speech of the advocate Nummasius. The Latin of the question about the delay reads “nec tamquam innocentibus” (“nor as though to innocent men”); the rhetorical sense is translated. The row of dots marks a gap in the printed text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.13 (CSEL 34.2:624–627; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-13).

## Letter 108.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:627–628
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Donatist boast of persecution by pointing to their own persecution of the Maximianists and to the violence of the Circumcellions.

### Latin text

Quid illud, quod soletis de sustentatis persecntionibus gloriari? si martyres non facit causa sed poena, cum diceretur: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur, frustra est additum: Propter iustitiam. nonne uos etiam in hoc titulo gloriae Maximianistae facillime uincunt, qui persecutionem non solum postea uobiscum sed prius et a uobis pertulerunt? aduocati accusantis Maximianum uestro collega praesente Restituto, qui in locum Salui Membressitani cum ceteris illis undecim sine dilatione damnati, antequam ipse dies dilationis transiret, iam fuerat ordinatus, uerba sunt, quae iam paulo ante commemoraui. Titianus etiam iam die ipso dilationis transacto Felicianum et Praetextatum, totam ipsam contra Primianum conspirationem uerbis grauissimis accusauit. concilium etiam Bagaiense non semel gestis proconsularibus ac deinde municipalibus allegatum est, excitata iudicia, impetratae minacissimae iussiones, postulatum atque praeceptum est, ad cohercitionem resistentes perducerentur, impertitum officium, concessa auxilia ciuitatum, per quae id, quod iudicatum est, impleretur. quid ergo nobiscum de tolerata persecutione confligitis, qui uobiscum ista non aequo iure diuisimus? cum enim non semper, qui persecutionem sustinet, perueniat ad passionem, sic inter nos composuerunt clerici et Circumcelliones uestri, ut uos persecutionem, nos passionem sustineremus. sed, ut dixi, cum Maximianistis de ista laude certate, qui contra uos recitant gesta forensia, ubi eos per iudices persecutionibus agitastis, sed plane cum quibusdam eorum tali cohercitione correctis postea concordastis, unde nec nostra est desperata concordia, si deus adiuuare et uobis pacificam mentem inspirare dignetur. nam et illud, quod contra nos a uestra parte magis ore maledico quam ueridico solet dici: Veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem, nos potius ista in tantis latrociniis Circumcellionum clericorumque uestrorum experti sumus, qui corporibus humanis caede atrocissima laniatis tot loca nostrorum sanguine cruentarunt, quorum duces, quando te ingredientem in hac patria cum suis cuneis deduxerunt, deo laudes inter cantica conclamantes quas uoces uelut tubas praeliorum in suis omnibus latrociniis habuerunt! alio tamen die concussi ac stimulati aculeis uerborum tuorum, quae in eos per Punicum interpretem honesta et ingenua libertatis indignatione iaculatus es factis eorum inritatus potius quam delectatus obsequiis, se de media congregatione, sicut ab eis, qui aderant, narrantibus audire potuimus, furibundis motibus rapuerunt nec post eorum pedes ueloces ad effundendum sanguinem ulla aqua pauimenta salsa lauistis, quod post nostros clerici tui putauerunt esse faciendum.

### English translation (Claude)

What of your habit of boasting about the persecutions you have endured? If martyrs are made not by the cause but by the penalty, then when it was said, “Blessed are those who suffer persecution,” it was idle to add, “for righteousness' sake.” Do not the Maximianists very easily beat you even on this claim to glory, since they suffered persecution not only afterward together with you but earlier also from you? The words I mentioned a little while ago belong to the advocate who accused Maximian in the presence of your colleague Restitutus, who had been ordained in the place of Salvius of Membresa, condemned without delay with those other eleven, before the very day of the delay had passed. Titianus too, when the very day of the delay had passed, accused Felicianus and Praetextatus and the whole conspiracy against Primian in the gravest words. The Council of Bagai was also cited more than once in proconsular and then in municipal proceedings; courts were set in motion, most threatening orders obtained; it was demanded and ordered that those who resisted be brought to coercion; an official staff was assigned, and the help of the cities granted, so that what had been judged might be carried out. Why then do you contend with us about persecution endured, you who have not shared these things with us on equal terms? For since not everyone who undergoes persecution comes to suffering, your clergy and Circumcellions have arranged matters between us so that you undergo persecution and we undergo suffering. But, as I said, contend for this praise with the Maximianists, who read out against you the court records in which you harassed them with persecutions through the judges; though plainly you afterward came to concord with some of them who had been corrected by such coercion. Hence concord with us too is not to be despaired of, if God deigns to help and to inspire you with a peaceable mind. For as for what is commonly said against us from your side with a mouth more abusive than truthful, “Their feet are swift to shed blood,” it is rather we who have experienced this in the many robberies of your Circumcellions and clergy, who, mangling human bodies with most atrocious slaughter, have stained so many places with the blood of our people. Their leaders, when they escorted you with their bands as you entered this region, shouting “Praise to God” among their songs: these are the cries they have used like battle trumpets in all their robberies! Yet on another day, shaken and stung by the goads of your words, which you hurled at them through a Punic interpreter with an honest and frank indignation, provoked by their deeds rather than pleased by their services, they rushed out from the midst of the congregation in a furious commotion, as we could hear from those who were present; and after their feet, swift to shed blood, you did not wash the floors with any salt water, as your clergy thought must be done after our people had been there.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 59:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Praise to God” (Deo laudes) was the Circumcellions' cry. The Punic interpreter shows that Macrobius addressed a Punic-speaking crowd through a translator. Salt-water washing of floors where Catholics had stood was a Donatist practice.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.14 (CSEL 34.2:627–628; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-14).

## Letter 108.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:628–629
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the Council of Bagai applied the text about feet swift to shed blood to Felicianus and Praetextatus, who were later received in full honor.

### Latin text

Sed, ut dicere coeperam, hoc de scripturis testimonium, quod in nos soletis magis conuiciando quam probando iactare: Veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem. etiam in Felicianum et Praetextatum impetu uehementi grandiloqua illa sententia concilii Bagaiensis euomuit. nam cum de Maximiano, quae uisa sunt dicenda, dixissent: Nec solum hunc, inquiunt, sceleris sui mors iusta condemnat; trahit etiam ad consortium criminis plurimos catena sacrilegii, de quibus scriptum est: Venenum aspidum sub labiis eorum, quorum os maledictione et amaritudine plenum est. ueloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem et cetera. quibus dictis ut deinde ostenderent, qui essent, quos traheret ad consortium criminis catena sacrilegii, eosque cum Maximiano simili seueritate damnarent: Famosi ergo, inquiunt, criminis reos Victorianum Carcauianensem, ad quem adiungunt alios undecim, inter quos Felicianum Mustitanum et Praetextatum Assuritanum. post haec in eos dicta facta est cum eis tanta concordia, ut nihil eorum minueretur honoribus, nullus ab eis ablutus post abluentium pedes ueloces ad effundendum sanguinem et rursus abluendus iudicaretur. cur ergo de nostra concordia desperandum est? deus diaboli auertat inuidiam et pax Christi uincat in cordibus nostris ac, sicut idem apostolus dicit, donemus nobismet ipsis, si quis aduersus aliquem habet querelam, sicut et deus in Christo donauit nobis, ut, quod iam dixi et saepe dicendum est, caritas cooperiat multitudinem peccatorum.

### English translation (Claude)

But, as I had begun to say, this testimony of the Scriptures which you are wont to throw at us more by way of abuse than of proof, “Their feet are swift to shed blood,” that grandiloquent sentence of the Council of Bagai vomited forth with violent force against Felicianus and Praetextatus also. For when they had said what seemed fit to say about Maximian, “Not only is he condemned,” they say, “by the just death of his crime; the chain of sacrilege also drags many into partnership in the crime, of whom it is written: ‘The poison of asps is under their lips, whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness; their feet are swift to shed blood,’” and so on. Having said this, in order to show next who were those whom the chain of sacrilege dragged into partnership in the crime, and to condemn them with the same severity as Maximian, they say: “Therefore those guilty of a notorious crime: Victorianus of Carcabia,” to whom they join eleven others, among them Felicianus of Musti and Praetextatus of Assuras. After these things had been said against them, such concord was made with them that nothing was taken from their honors, and no one washed by them, after the feet of those washers “swift to shed blood,” was judged to need washing again. Why then should concord with us be despaired of? May God turn away the envy of the devil, and may the peace of Christ prevail in our hearts; and, as the same apostle says, let us forgive one another, if anyone has a complaint against another, as God in Christ has forgiven us; so that, as I have already said and must often say, love may cover a multitude of sins.

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:32: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 3:13–15 (from Ps 140:3 and Isa 59:7) as quoted in the decree of the Council of Bagai.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.15 (CSEL 34.2:628–629; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-1/#p-108-15).

## Letter 108.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:629–631
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that any honest Donatist defense of the Maximianist affair must adopt the Catholic principles on baptism, tolerance of the wicked, and moderate coercion.

### Latin text

Verum tu, frater, cum quo nunc ago et de quo in Christo, sicut ipse nouit, gaudere desidero, si partis Donati defensionem in hac Maximiani causa uelis pro ingenii tui et eloquii facultate suscipere nec mendaciter agere, quoniam recens est memoria ipsis hominibus, in quos haec gesta sunt, adhuc in corpore constitutis, tot etiam proconsularibus et municipalibus gestis cuncta testata sunt, nonne confugies ad praesidia ueritatis, quibus aduersus uos semper catholica ecclesia commonita est, ut nec illud de aqua aliena et de aqua mendacii et lauacro mortui et si qua alia sunt huius modi, sicut soletis, intellegenda fatearis, sed eo potius modo, ut baptismus Christi ad participationem salutis aeternae datus ecclesiae nec extra ecclesiam iudicetur extraneus nec in alienis deputetur alienus, sed extraneis et alienis ualeat ad perniciem, suis autem et propriis ad salutem atque in illis, cum ad pacem ecclesiae conuertuntur, error emendetur, non sacramentum errorem puniens destruatur utque id, quod oberat foris peruerso, intus incipiat prodesse correcto, nec illa rursus de non communicando peccatis alienis, de separatione a malis, de non tangendo inmundo atque polluto, de cauenda modici fermenti corruptione et cetera talia, sicut soletis, accepturus es, ne uos in Maximiani causa inexplicabiliter implicetis, sed ita sapiens hoc adseres, hoc tenebis, quod sana doctrina commendat, quod uera regula exemplis propheticis atque apostolicis probat malos esse potius tolerandos, ne destruantur boni, quam bonos deserendos, ut separentur mali, tantum ut ab imitatione, a consensione, a uitae ac morum similitudine reprobi seiungantur simul crescentes, simul in tribulatione permixti, simul intra retia congregati usque ad tempus messis, uentilationis et litoris? de persecutione autem quicquid ad expellendos et sedibus proturbandos Maximianistas a uestris per iudices actum est, quo modo defensurus es, nisi hoc prudentiores uestros corrigendi animo, non nocendi moderato terrore fecisse; si qui autem humanum modum excesserunt sicut in his, quae Saluium Membressitanum esse perpessum ciuitas ipsa testatur, non praescribere ceteris tamquam palea cum frumentis in una sacramentorum communione constitutis, uitae autem dissimilitudine separatis?

### English translation (Claude)

But you, brother, with whom I am now dealing and in whom I desire to rejoice in Christ, as he himself knows: if you should wish, with all the resources of your mind and eloquence, to undertake the defense of the party of Donatus in this case of Maximian, and not to argue falsely, since the memory is fresh, the very men against whom these proceedings were taken are still alive in the body, and everything has been attested by so many proconsular and municipal records, will you not take refuge in the defenses of the truth with which the Catholic Church has always been furnished against you? Then you will confess that the texts about foreign water, about lying water, and about the washing of the dead, and any others of this kind, are not to be understood as you are wont to understand them, but rather in this way: that the baptism of Christ, given to the church for participation in eternal salvation, is neither judged foreign outside the church nor reckoned alien among aliens, but avails to destruction for strangers and aliens and to salvation for its own; and that in those, when they turn to the peace of the church, the error is amended, and the sacrament is not destroyed in punishing the error; so that what harmed the perverse man outside begins to profit the corrected man inside. Nor will you take the texts about not sharing in others' sins, about separation from the wicked, about not touching the unclean and polluted, about guarding against the corruption of a little leaven, and others of this kind, as you are wont to, lest you entangle yourselves inextricably in the case of Maximian; but, being wise, you will assert and hold what sound doctrine commends, what the true rule proves by the examples of prophets and apostles: that the wicked are rather to be tolerated, lest the good be destroyed, than the good deserted so that the wicked may be separated; provided only that the reprobate are separated from imitation, from consent, from likeness of life and conduct, while they grow together, are mingled together in tribulation, and are gathered together within the nets until the time of harvest, winnowing, and the shore. And as for persecution, whatever was done by your people through the judges to drive the Maximianists out and dislodge them from their sees: how will you defend it, except by saying that the more prudent of your people did this with moderate terror, with the intention of correcting, not of harming; and that if some exceeded the human measure, as in what the city itself testifies that Salvius of Membresa suffered, this does not prejudice the others, who are like chaff with the wheat, joined in one communion of the sacraments but separated by unlikeness of life?

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine here presents the defense of moderate coercion for correction as the argument the Donatists themselves would have to use for their action against the Maximianists; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.16 (CSEL 34.2:629–631; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-16).

## Letter 108.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:631–632
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists the evils of the schism, which divides the flock, married couples, and neighbors at the very altar.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, amplector istam defensionem tuam. ista quippe erit, si uerax erit, et ueritate uincetur, si ista non erit. amplector, inquam, defensionem tuam, sed hanc esse cernis et meam. cur non ergo in unitate areae dominicae simul frumentum esse laboremus, simul paleam toleramus? cur non, obsecro te, quae causa, cui bono, ob quam utilitatem? dic mihi. fugitur unitas, ut agni unici sanguine populi comparati aduersus inuicem studiis contrariis inflammentur et diuidantur oues quasi nostrae inter nos patris familias illius, qui seruo dixit: Pasce oues meas, non: Pasce oues tuas, et de quibus dictum est: Ut sit unus grex et unus pastor, qui clamat in euangelio: In hoc scient omnes, quia discipuli mei estis, si ueram dilectionem habueritis in uobis, et: Sinite crescere utraque usque ad messem, ne forte, cum uultis colligere zizania, eradicetis simul et triticum. fugitur unitas, ut huc maritus illuc uxor conueniat, dicat ille: Mecum tene unitatem, quia ego sum uir tuus, respondeat illa: Ibi moror, ubi est pater meus ut in uno lecto diuidant Christum, quos detestaremur, si diuiderent lectum. fugitur unitas, ut propinqui et ciues et amici et hospites et quicumque sibi humana necessitudine conligati utrique Christiani in conuiuiis ineundis, in matrimoniis tradendis et accipiendis, in emendo ac uendendo, in pactis et placitis, in salutationibus, in consensionibus, in conlocutionibus, in omnibus suis rebus negotiisque concordes sint et ad dei altare discordes; qui enim quantam libet aliunde conceptam illic deberent finire discordiam et secundum praeceptum domini prius reconciliari fratribus suis et tunc offerre munus altaris, alibi concordes ibi discordant.

### English translation (Claude)

Since this is so, I embrace this defense of yours. For this is what it will be, if it is truthful; and it will be overcome by the truth, if it is not this. I embrace, I say, your defense; but you see that it is mine too. Why then do we not labor together to be wheat in the unity of the Lord's threshing floor, and tolerate the chaff together? Why not, I beg you: what is the cause, for whose good, for what benefit? Tell me. Unity is fled, so that peoples purchased by the blood of the one Lamb are inflamed against one another with contrary passions, and the sheep are divided between us as though they were ours, the sheep of that householder who said to his servant, “Feed my sheep,” not “Feed your sheep,” and of whom it was said, “That there may be one flock and one shepherd”; who cries in the gospel, “By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have true love among you,” and, “Let both grow until the harvest, lest perhaps, when you wish to gather the tares, you root up the wheat together with them.” Unity is fled, so that the husband goes to one place and the wife to another; he says, “Keep unity with me, because I am your husband,” and she answers, “I stay where my father is”; so that in one bed they divide Christ, they whom we would detest if they divided the bed. Unity is fled, so that relatives, fellow citizens, friends, guests, and whoever are bound to one another by human ties, both being Christians, agree in holding banquets, in giving and taking in marriage, in buying and selling, in contracts and agreements, in greetings, in assents, in conversations, in all their affairs and business, and disagree at the altar of God; for those who ought to end there whatever discord they had conceived elsewhere, and, according to the Lord's command, first be reconciled to their brothers and then offer their gift at the altar, agree elsewhere and disagree there.

### Scripture references

- Rev 5:9: allusion, medium confidence
- John 21:17: quotation, high confidence
- John 10:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:35: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:29: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:30: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:23: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The wife's “father” is probably her bishop or pastor (uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.17 (CSEL 34.2:631–632; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-17).

## Letter 108.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:632
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes the Circumcellions' violence against landowners and masters and the Donatist clergy's dependence on them.

### Latin text

Fugitur unitas, ut nos aduersus uestrorum — nolo enim uestras dicere — inprobitates quaeramus publicas leges et aduersus ipsas leges armentur Circumcelliones, quas eo ipso furore contemnant, quo in uos eas, cum furerent, excitarunt. fugitur unitas, ut contra possessores suos rusticana erigatur audacia et fugitiui serui contra apostolicam disciplinam non solum a dominis alienentur, uerum etiam dominis comminentur nec solum comminentur, sed et uiolentissimis adgressionibus depraedentur auctoribus et ducibus et in ipso scelere principibus agonisticis confessoribus uestris, qui ad deo laudes ornant honorem uestrum, ad deo laudes fundunt sanguinem alienum, ut uos propter hominum inuidiam collectis uestris atque discursis promittatis praedas eis, a quibus ablatae sunt, reddituros nec tamen et hoc uelitis ut ualeatis implere, ne illorum audaciam, quam sibi putauerunt uestri presbyteri necessariam, nimium cogamini offendere; iactant enim praecedentia circa uos merita sua demonstrantes et enumerantes ante istam legem, qua gaudetis uobis redditam libertatem, quot loca et basilicas per eos presbyteri uestri uastatis nostris fugatisque tenuerunt, ut, si in eos uolueritis esse seueri, beneficiis eorum appareatis ingrati.

### English translation (Claude)

Unity is fled, so that we seek public laws against the outrages of your people (for I do not want to say yours), and the Circumcellions are armed against those very laws, which they despise with the same fury with which, in their raging, they provoked them against you. Unity is fled, so that rustic audacity is raised up against its landowners, and runaway slaves, contrary to the apostolic discipline, are not only estranged from their masters but even threaten their masters; and not only threaten them, but plunder them with most violent assaults, with your “agonistic” confessors as instigators and leaders and chiefs in the very crime, men who with “Praise to God” adorn your honor and with “Praise to God” shed the blood of others. So it is that you, because of public resentment, having assembled your people and gone round among them, promise to return the plunder to those from whom it was taken, and yet you do not wish to be able to fulfill even this, lest you be compelled to offend too much the audacity of those men, which your presbyters thought necessary to them. For they boast, showing and counting up their earlier services to you before that law by which you rejoice that liberty has been given back to you: how many places and basilicas your presbyters held through them, after our people had been laid waste and driven out; so that, if you wished to be severe toward them, you would appear ungrateful for their benefits.

### Scripture references

- Eph 6:5: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Agonistic” (agonistici, “fighters”) was the Circumcellions' name for themselves. The “apostolic discipline” for slaves refers to texts such as Eph 6:5 and 1 Tim 6:1. The law restoring the Donatists' liberty is probably the imperial grant of toleration of 409–410 (identification uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.18 (CSEL 34.2:632; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-18).

## Letter 108.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:632–633
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the occasion of the letter is the rebaptism of Rusticianus, an excommunicated and indebted subdeacon, and recalls a similar case that ended in violence.

### Latin text

Fugitur unitas, ut, quicumque apud nos ferre detractauerint disciplinam, ad illos fugiant defendendi, ut uobis offerantur rebaptizandi, sicut iste de agro subdiaconus Rusticianus, cuius causa haec ad te scribere magno sum dolore ac timore compulsus, propter reprobos et peruersos mores excommunicatus a presbytero suo, multorum etiam in illa regione debitor factus et contra ecclesiasticum uigorem et contra creditores suos aliud praesidium non quaesiuit, nisi ut abs te iterum plagaretur et ab ipsis quasi mundissimus amaretur. iam talem diaconum nostrum et ipsum a suo presbytero excommunicatum decessor tuus rebaptizauit et uestrum diaconum fecit, qui non post multos dies eorundem perditorum, sicut desiderauit, commixtus audacia et in nocturna adgressione in medio latrocinio atque incendio suo subuenientis multitudinis concursu peremptus est. hi sunt fructus diuisionis huius, quam sanare non uultis sic fugiendo unitatem, quem ad modum fuerat ipsa diuisio fugienda, quae per se ipsa foeda est et damnabilis deo, etiam si propter ipsam haec et talia tam horrenda et nefanda non fierent.

### English translation (Claude)

Unity is fled, so that whoever among us refuse to bear discipline flee to them to be defended, so that they may be offered to you to be rebaptized; like this country subdeacon Rusticianus, on whose account I have been compelled with great sorrow and fear to write these things to you. Excommunicated by his presbyter because of his reprobate and perverse conduct, and having also become a debtor to many in that region, he sought no other protection against the rigor of the church and against his creditors than to be wounded again by you and loved by those men as though he were perfectly pure. Already your predecessor rebaptized a deacon of ours of the same kind, who had likewise been excommunicated by his presbyter, and made him your deacon; not many days later, joined, as he wished, with the audacity of those same abandoned men, he was killed in a night attack, in the midst of his robbery and arson, by a crowd that ran together to bring help. These are the fruits of this division, which you refuse to heal, fleeing unity in the very way in which the division itself ought to have been fled, a division foul in itself and damnable before God, even if these and other such horrible and abominable things did not happen because of it.

### Translation notes

- “Wounded again” (iterum plagaretur): Augustine treats rebaptism as a second wounding.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.19 (CSEL 34.2:632–633; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-19).

## Letter 108.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:633–634
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appeals to Macrobius to keep the peace of Christ, citing the ark in which clean and unclean animals were carried together until the flood ended.

### Latin text

Agnoscamus ergo, frater, pacem Christi pariterque teneamus et, quantum deus donat, simul boni esse studeamus et simul malos salua unitate quanta possumus disciplina emendemus et propter ipsam unitatem quanta possumus patientia toleremus, ne, sicut Christus admonuit, cum uolumus ante tempus colligere zizania, quae beatus Cyprianus non extra sed in ecclesia uideri cernique testatus est, eradicemus simul et triticum. neque enim re uera uos habetis propria quaedam priuilegia sanctitatis, ut nos polluant mali nostri et uos non polluant mali uestri, ut nos antiqua contaminet, quam nescimus, timiditas traditorum et uos non contaminet praesens, quam uidetis, audacia perditorum. agnoscamus arcam illam, quae praefigurauit ecclesiam; simul illic munda animalia simus nec in ea nobiscum etiam inmunda portari usque in finem diluuii recusemus. simul in arca fuerunt, sed non simul domino in odorem sacrificii placuerunt; nam post diluuium de mundis Noe sacrificium, non de inmundis obtulit deo. nec ideo tamen a mundis aliquibus arca ante tempus propter inmunda deserta est; coruus tamen deseruit et se ante tempus ab illius arcae communione separauit, sed de binis inmundis, non de septenis mundis fuit; huius separationis inmunditiam detestemur. nam quicumque talibus moribus laudabiles sunt, facit eos sola separatio ista damnabiles, quia filius malus ipse se iustum dicit, exitum autem suum non abluit, quamuis insolenter elatus et ipse suo tumore caecatus audeat dicere, quod propheta praeuidens detestatus est: Noli me tangere, quoniam mundus sum. quisquis ergo ante tempus uelut propter quorundam inmunditiam congregationem huius deserit unitatis tamquam arcam in diluuio munda atque inmunda portantem, ostendit se potius hoc esse, quod fugit. hoc uoluit dominus ut etiam in hac ciuitate plebs tua per os cuiusdam...........

### English translation (Claude)

Let us therefore acknowledge, brother, the peace of Christ and hold it together; and, as far as God grants, let us strive together to be good, and together correct the wicked with as much discipline as we can while preserving unity, and for the sake of that unity tolerate them with as much patience as we can; lest, as Christ warned, while we wish to gather the tares before the time (tares which blessed Cyprian testified are seen and perceived not outside but in the church), we root up the wheat together with them. For in truth you do not have some special privileges of holiness, so that our wicked pollute us and your wicked do not pollute you; so that the ancient timidity of the traditors, which we do not know, contaminates us, and the present audacity of abandoned men, which you see, does not contaminate you. Let us recognize that ark which prefigured the church; let us be clean animals in it together, and let us not refuse that unclean animals too be carried in it with us until the end of the flood. They were together in the ark, but they did not together please the Lord as an odor of sacrifice; for after the flood Noah offered God a sacrifice from the clean, not from the unclean. Yet the ark was not on that account deserted before the time by any of the clean because of the unclean; the raven, however, did desert it and separated itself before the time from the communion of that ark, but it was of the pairs of unclean animals, not of the sevens of clean ones. Let us detest the uncleanness of this separation. For whoever are praiseworthy for such conduct, this separation alone makes them damnable, because “a wicked son calls himself righteous, but does not wash away his going out,” though, insolently puffed up and blinded by his own swelling, he dares to say what the prophet foresaw and detested: “Do not touch me, for I am clean.” Whoever, then, before the time, as if because of the uncleanness of certain people, deserts the congregation of this unity, like the ark in the flood carrying clean and unclean, shows that he is rather what he flees. The Lord willed this, that in this city too your people through the mouth of a certain …

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 8:20: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 8:7: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 7:2: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 30:12: quotation, medium confidence
- Isa 65:5: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 54.3 (Letters): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter breaks off unfinished in the manuscripts; the row of dots marks the end of the surviving text. On Cyprian, see Ep. 54.3 (quoted in 108.10–11). The proverb is the Greek (LXX) form; cf. Prov 30:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 108.20 (CSEL 34.2:633–634; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-108-20).

## Letter 109.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:634–636
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Severus, bishop of Milevis, writes to Augustine of the joy and nourishment he finds in reading his works.

### Latin text

Deo gratias, frater Augustine, cuius donum est, quicquid in nobis bonorum gaudiorum est. fateor, bene mihi tecum est, multum te lego; mirum dicam sed uerum plane: quam mihi absens solet esse praesentia, tam praesens facta est absentia tui. nullae se nobis interponunt turbulentae actiones temporalium rerum. ago, quantum possum, etsi non tantum possum, quantum uolo. quid ergo dicam, quantum uolo? nosti optime, quam auarus sim tui, nec tamen murmuro, quia non tantum ago, quantum uolo, quoniam rursus non minus ago, quantum possum. deo ergo gratias, frater dulcissime, bene mihi tecum est, gaudeo tecum artius coniunctus et, ut ita dicam, unissime, quantum potest, adhaerens tibi redundantiam uberum tuorum suscipiens uires comparo, si possim idoneus effici ad ea concutienda et exprimenda, ut, quicquid secretius et interius clausum custodiunt, remotis pellibus, quas adhuc lactanti sugendas inserunt, ipsa mihi uiscera, si possibile est, dignentur effundere. uiscera, inquam, mihi ut refundantur cupio, uiscera tua, uiscera pinguia sagina caelesti et condita omni dulcedine spiritali, uiscera tua, uiscera pura, uiscera simplicia, nisi quod duplici sunt uinculo redimita geminae caritatis, uiscera tua, uiscera perfusa lumine ueritatis et refulgentia ueritatem. horum me manationi uel resultationi subicio, quo nox mea in lumine tuo deficiat, ut in diei claritate simul ambulare possimus. o uere artificiosa apis dei construens fauos diuini nectaris plenos, manantes misericordiam et ueritatem, per quos discurrens deliciatur anima mea et uitali pastu, quicquid in se minus inuenit aut inbecillum sentit, resarcire et suffulcire molitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Thanks be to God, brother Augustine, whose gift is whatever good joys are in us. I confess, it is well with me with you; I read you a great deal. I will say something marvelous but plainly true: as your presence used to be absent to me, so your absence has become present to me. No troubling business of temporal affairs comes between us. I do what I can, even if I cannot do as much as I wish. Why, then, do I say “as much as I wish”? You know very well how greedy I am for you; and yet I do not murmur that I do not do as much as I wish, since, on the other hand, I do no less than I can. Thanks be to God, then, sweetest brother; it is well with me with you. I rejoice to be more closely joined with you and, if I may say so, made most wholly one with you; clinging to you as far as I can, receiving the overflow of your breasts, I gather strength, in case I can be made fit to shake and press them, so that whatever they guard more secretly and keep shut up within, the skins being removed which they still offer me to suck as a nursling, they may deign to pour out to me their very inmost parts, if that is possible. Your inmost parts, I say, I long to have poured out for me: your inmost parts, fat with heavenly nourishment and seasoned with every spiritual sweetness; your inmost parts, pure, simple, except that they are bound with the double bond of twofold love; your inmost parts, filled with the light of truth and shining with truth. To their flowing out and reflected light I submit myself, so that my night may fade away in your light and we may walk together in the brightness of day. O truly skillful bee of God, building honeycombs full of divine nectar, flowing with mercy and truth, through which my soul ranges and delights, and with life-giving food strives to repair and prop up whatever it finds lacking or feels weak in itself.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 2:2: allusion, low confidence
- Ps 85:10 (84:11 LXX): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Severus, bishop of Milevis, Augustine's friend. “Inmost parts” renders uiscera (the inner being, the seat of affection).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 109.1 (CSEL 34.2:634–636; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-1).

## Letter 109.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:636–637
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Severus praises Augustine's ministry for leading readers through love of neighbor to the love of God, which has no measure.

### Latin text

Benedicitur dominus per praeconium oris tui et fidele ministerium, quod sic concinere et respondere facis canenti tibi domino, ut, quicquid de eius plenitudine ad nos usque redundat, iucundius efficiatur et gratius per tuum elegantem famulatum et succinctam munditiam et fidele ac castum simplexque ministerium, quod ita resplendere facis per argutias tuas et uigilantiam tuam, ut perstringat oculos et in se rapiat, nisi tu idem innuas dominum, ut, quicquid in te delectabile lucet, referentes nos ad illum ipsius esse agnoscamus, de cuius bonitate tam bonus es et de cuius puritate et simplicitate et pulchritudine purus, simplex et pulcher es, et illi agentes gratias de bono tuo, dono suo dignetur nos tibi adiungere uel quoquo modo subiungere, ut plenius subiciamur illi, cuius te ductu ac moderatione talem gaudemus, ut et tibi contingat gaudere de nobis. quod non diffido fore, si tuis me orationibus adiuues, cuius imitatione non nihil iam profeci, ut talis esse desiderem. uides, quid facias, quod sic bonus es. quam nos rapias in amorem proximi, qui nobis primus ad dilectionem dei et ultimus gradus est et quasi limes, quo sibi uterque adnectitur, dei et proximi, in quo nos, ut dixi, quasi limite stantes amborum calore tangimur et amborum flagramus amore. sed quantum nos iste ignis exusserit et purgauerit proximi, tantum nos in illum puriorem dei ire compellit. in quo iam nullus nobis amandi modus inponitur, quando ipse ibi modus est sine modo amare. non ergo uerendum est, ne plus amemus dominum nostrum, sed, ne minus, timendum.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord is blessed through the proclamation of your mouth and your faithful ministry, which you make sing in harmony with the Lord who sings to you, and answer him, in such a way that whatever overflows to us from his fullness becomes more pleasant and welcome through your elegant service, your trim neatness, and your faithful, chaste, and simple ministry. You make it shine so brightly by your subtlety and vigilance that it would dazzle our eyes and draw them to itself, did you not yourself point us to the Lord, so that, referring to him whatever delightful thing shines in you, we may recognize that it is his, by whose goodness you are so good, and by whose purity, simplicity, and beauty you are pure, simple, and beautiful; and so that, as we give thanks to him for your good, which is his gift, he may deign to join us to you, or in some way to place us under you, that we may be more fully subject to him under whose guidance and governance we rejoice that you are what you are, and that it may also befall you to rejoice in us. This I do not doubt will come about, if you help me with your prayers; for by imitating you I have already made some progress, so that I desire to be such. You see what you bring about by being so good: how you carry us away into love of neighbor, which is for us the first step to the love of God and the last, and as it were the boundary at which both are joined together, the love of God and of neighbor; standing on it as on a boundary, as I said, we are touched by the warmth of both and burn with the love of both. But the more that fire of love of neighbor burns us out and purifies us, the more it drives us into that purer fire of God. There no measure of loving is any longer imposed on us, since there the measure itself is to love without measure. We need not fear, then, that we may love our Lord too much; we must fear that we may love him too little.

### Scripture references

- John 1:16: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 22:37: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 22:39: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 109.2 (CSEL 34.2:636–637; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-2).

## Letter 109.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:637–638
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Severus explains that the preceding letter was written in a time of leisure, and asks when and where he should meet Augustine.

### Latin text

Haec epistula superior, quae tibi me quasi abstersa tristitia facilitate actionum de liberali otio, quod tecum mihi agere licuit in hoc rure posito — nam ita licere potuit —, laetiorem offert, antequam sane uenerabilis episcopus nos uisitare dignaretur, quasi meta illorum gaudiorum scripta est et, quod uere mirer, eodem die uenit, quo scripta est. quid hoc est, quaeso, anima mea, nisi forte quod nos delectat, tametsi honestum est, non tamen satis utile, quia in parte est? interim licet uniuerso hanc ipsam partem, id est nos ipsos, quantum pro peccatis nostris nobis cedit materia, id est nos ipsi cedimus nobis, elimatiores et compaginabiliores, si tamen admittis hoc uerbum, aptare moliamur. habes epistulam non pro tua magnitudine sed pro mea paruitate longiorem, qua et prouocauerim, ut iam non pro mea paruitate sed pro tua magnitudine mihi epistula mittatur. quae tamen quantacumque erit, mihi longa non erit, cui totum tempus breue est ad legendum. rescribe mihi, quando aut ubi occurrere debeam propter illam causam, qua me iussisti occurrere. quod si est integra et non forte aliud melius placuit, tunc occurram; sin minus, rogo te, nolo me a cursu meo reuoces; illa enim sola uisa est, quam praeponerem mihi. fratres omnes, qui nobis in domino conserui sunt, et desidero multum et saluto.

### English translation (Claude)

This preceding letter, which presents me to you as more cheerful, my sadness as it were wiped away by the lightening of business, from the liberal leisure I was allowed to enjoy with you while staying on this country estate (for so it was possible), was written as a kind of finishing post of those joys, before the venerable bishop indeed deigned to visit us; and, what I truly marvel at, he came on the very day on which it was written. What does this mean, I ask, my soul, unless perhaps that what delights us, although it is honorable, is nevertheless not useful enough, because it is only in a part? Meanwhile, let us strive to fit this very part, that is, ourselves, to the whole, made more polished and better jointed, if you will allow the word, as far as the material yields to us because of our sins, that is, as far as we yield to ourselves. You have a letter longer, not in proportion to your greatness but to my littleness, by which I hope I have also provoked you, so that a letter may now be sent to me in proportion not to my littleness but to your greatness. Yet however great it is, it will not be long for me, for whom all time is short for reading. Write back to me when or where I ought to meet you on account of that matter for which you bade me meet you. If it is still unsettled and nothing better has perhaps been decided, then I will come; if not, I beg you, I would not have you call me back from my course; for that alone seemed something I would put ahead of my own plans. All the brothers who are our fellow servants in the Lord I greatly long for and greet.

### Translation notes

- The sense of several clauses in this section (the “part” and the “whole”, and the last sentence about the meeting) is uncertain; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 109.3 (CSEL 34.2:637–638; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-109-3).

## Letter 110.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:638–639
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Severus, explaining why his answer was delayed and that he remains in his debt.

### Latin text

Epistula mea, quam peruexit carissimus filius et condiaconus noster Timotheus, iam parata erat profecturo, quando filii nostri Quoduultdeus et Gaudentius ad nos uenerunt cum litteris tuis. inde factum est, ut continuo proficiscens non adferret responsionem meam, quoniam post illorum aduentum quantulumcumque apud nos inmoratus est et profecturus per horas singulas uidebatur. sed etsi per eum respondissem, adhuc debitor forem. nam et nunc, quod uideor respondisse, debitor sum non dico caritatis, quam tanto magis debemus, quanto amplius inpenderimus, cuius nos perpetuos debitores ostendit apostolus dicens: Nemini quicquam debeatis. nisi ut inuicem diligatis, sed ipsius epistulae tuae; quando enim sufficiam tuae suauitati tantaeque auiditati animi tui, quam mihi lecta nuntiauit? rem quidem in te mihi notissimam insinuauit; uerum tamen etsi non mihi rei nouae insinuatrix, noua tamen rescriptorum exactrix fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

My letter, which our dearest son and fellow deacon Timothy delivered, was already prepared for him as he was setting out, when our sons Quodvultdeus and Gaudentius came to us with your letter. So it happened that, setting out at once, he did not bring my reply, since after their arrival he stayed with us only a very short while and seemed to be about to leave from hour to hour. But even if I had replied by him, I would still be a debtor. For even now, when I seem to have replied, I am a debtor: I do not mean of love, which we owe the more the more we have spent it, and of which the apostle shows us to be perpetual debtors when he says, “Owe no one anything, except to love one another,” but of your letter itself; for when shall I be equal to your sweetness and to the great eagerness of your mind which it announced to me when it was read? It conveyed to me something about you that I knew very well; yet although it brought me nothing new, it was a new demand for a reply.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:8: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.1 (CSEL 34.2:638–639; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-1).

## Letter 110.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:639
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Severus that the sincerity of his praise leaves him in debt, since modesty forbids him to praise Severus in return.

### Latin text

Miraris fortasse, cur me huius debiti persolutorem inparem dicam, cum tu de me tam multum sentias, qui me tamquam anima mea noueris. sed hoc ipsum est, quod mihi magnam difficultatem facit respondendi litteris tuis, quia et, quantus mihi uidearis, parco dicere propter uerecundiam tuam et utique minus dicendo, cum tu in me tantam laudem contuleris, quid nisi debitor remanebo? quod non curarem, si ea, quae de me ad me locutus es, non ex caritate sincerissima dicta scirem sed adulatione inimica amicitiae. hoc quippe modo nec debitor fierem, quia talia rependere non deberem; sed quanto magis noui, quam fideli animo loqueris, tanto magis uideo, quanto debito grauer.

### English translation (Claude)

You are perhaps surprised that I call myself unequal to paying this debt, since you think so much of me, you who know me as though I were your own soul. But this is the very thing that makes it so difficult for me to reply to your letter: out of regard for your modesty I refrain from saying how great you seem to me; and certainly, if I say less, when you have bestowed such praise on me, what shall I remain but a debtor? I would not care about this if I knew that what you said to me about myself was spoken not out of the most sincere love but out of flattery, the enemy of friendship. In that case I would not even become a debtor, since I would not owe a return for such things; but the better I know with what faithful mind you speak, the more I see how heavy a debt weighs on me.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.2 (CSEL 34.2:639; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-2).

## Letter 110.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:639–640
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that untrue things can be said faithfully, as Severus has done in praising him.

### Latin text

Vide autem, quid mihi contigit, ut me quodam modo ipse laudauerim, qui me a te fideliter laudatum dixerim. sed quid aliud dicerem quam id, quod de te admonui, quam nosti? ecce mihi nouam feci quaestionem, quam tu non proposuisti et eam fortassis expectas ut soluam. ita mihi parum erat, quod debitor eram, nisi etiam me ampliore debito ipse cumularem. quamquam hoc facile sit ostendere et, si non ostendam, facile tibi uidere et uera infideliter dici posse et non uera fideliter. qui enim sic credit, ut loquitur, etsi non uera loquitur, fideliter loquitur; qui autem non credit, quae loquitur, etsi uera loquitur, infideliter loquitur. numquid ergo dubito, quod ea de me credas, quae scripsisti? quae cum in me non agnosco, potuisti fideliter de me non uera dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

But see what has happened to me: I have in a way praised myself, by saying that I was praised by you faithfully. But what else could I say than what I reminded you of about yourself, which you know? See, I have raised a new question for myself, which you did not raise, and which perhaps you expect me to resolve. So it was not enough that I was a debtor; I had to heap a greater debt on myself. And yet it is easy to show, and if I do not show it, easy for you to see, that true things can be said unfaithfully and untrue things faithfully. For one who believes as he speaks, even if he does not speak the truth, speaks faithfully; but one who does not believe what he says, even if he speaks the truth, speaks unfaithfully. Do I then doubt that you believe what you wrote about me? Since I do not recognize these things in myself, you were able to say faithfully things about me that are not true.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.3 (CSEL 34.2:639–640; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-3).

## Letter 110.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:640
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Severus not to be misled by affection into overpraising him, and explains why he does not praise Severus in return.

### Latin text

Sed nolo te uel beniuolentia sic falli. cui beniuolentiae debitor sum, quia et tam fideliter et tam beniuole ea, quae uera sunt, possem de te dicere, nisi, ut supra dixi, uerecundiae tuae parcerem. ego autem quando laudor a germanissimo et familiarissimo animae meae, uelut a me ipso lauder, sic habeo. quod cernis quam molestum sit, etiam si uera dicantur; quanto potius, quia etiam, cum sis altera anima mea, immo una sit anima tua et mea, sic in me falleris putando mihi adesse, quae desunt, quo modo et de se ipse unus homo falli potest! quod non tantum ideo nolo, ne, quem diligo, tu fallaris, uerum etiam ne minus ores, ut sim, quod iam esse me credis. nec in eo sum tibi debitor, ut eodem progressu beniuolentiae credam et loquar de te bona, quae adhuc et tu tibi deesse cognoscis, sed ut animo tam quidem beniuolo ea tamen dicam bona tua, dona dei, de quibus in te certus sum. quod non ideo non facio, ne fallar in eis, sed ne tu a me laudatus ipse te laudasse uidearis et propter illam iustitiae regulam, quia mihi fieri nolo. quod si fieri debet, eligo esse debitor, quam diu puto non esse faciendum; si autem fieri non debet, nec debitor sum.

### English translation (Claude)

But I do not want you to be deceived in this way, even by goodwill. To that goodwill I am a debtor, because I too could say about you, with equal faithfulness and goodwill, things that are true, did I not, as I said above, spare your modesty. But when I am praised by the closest and most intimate friend of my soul, I feel as though I were being praised by myself. You see how irksome that is, even if true things are said; how much more so because, though you are my other soul, or rather your soul and mine are one, you are deceived about me, thinking that things are present in me that are lacking, in the way that a single man can be deceived even about himself! I do not want this, not only so that you, whom I love, may not be deceived, but also so that you may not pray less that I may be what you already believe me to be. Nor is my debt to you such that, with the same advance of goodwill, I should believe and speak good things of you which you yourself know are still lacking in you; it is rather that I should, with an equally kindly mind, speak of those goods of yours, the gifts of God, of which I am certain in you. I refrain from this, not for fear of being deceived about them, but lest, when praised by me, you should seem to have praised yourself; and because of that rule of justice, since I do not want it done to me. If it ought to be done, I choose to remain a debtor as long as I think it ought not to be done; but if it ought not to be done, I am not a debtor either.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:12: allusion, low confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.4 (CSEL 34.2:640; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-4).

## Letter 110.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:640–641
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that justice requires repaying a debt before giving gifts, and that his duties leave him almost no time.

### Latin text

Sed noui, quid mihi ad haec respondere possis: Ita ista loqueris, quasi prolixam epistulam tuam de laudibus meis desiderauerim). absit, ut hoc de te credam; sed epistula tua nolo dicere quam ueris uel quam non ueris plena tamen laudibus meis hoc de me ut rependerem etiam te nolente flagitauit. nam si quid aliud uolebas ut scriberem, largitorem me desiderabas, non redditorem. porro iustitiae ordo sic habet, ut debitum prius reddamus, tum deinde, cui reddimus, si hoc placet, aliquid et donemus. quamquam etiam talia, qualia desiderasti ut scriberem, si diligentius praecepta dominica cogitemus, reddimus potius quam donamus, si nemini quicquam debendum est, nisi ut inuicem diligamus. ipsa quippe dilectio exigit debitum, ut fraternae caritati seruientes eum, qui se adiuuari recte uelit, in quo possumus, adiuuemus. sed, mi frater, et tu credo quod noueris, quanta sint in manibus meis, quibus aduersus curas, quas nostrae seruitutis necessitas habet, uix mihi paucissimae guttae temporis stillantur, quas aliis rebus si inpendero, contra officium meum mihi facere uideor.

### English translation (Claude)

But I know what you could reply to this: “You speak as though I had wanted a long letter from you in praise of me.” Far be it from me to believe this of you; but your letter, full of praises of me, I will not say how true or how untrue, demanded, even against your will, that I pay you back in this. For if you wanted me to write something else, you desired me as a giver, not as one who repays. Now the order of justice is that we first pay what is owed, and then afterward, if it pleases, also give something to the one we pay. And yet even such things as you wanted me to write, if we consider the Lord's precepts more carefully, we pay rather than give, if nothing is to be owed to anyone except to love one another. For love itself demands its due, that, serving brotherly love, we help as far as we can one who rightly wishes to be helped. But, my brother, I believe you too know how much I have on my hands, so that against the cares that the necessities of our service bring, scarcely the fewest drops of time trickle down to me; and if I spend them on other things, I seem to act against my duty.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:8: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.5 (CSEL 34.2:640–641; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-5).

## Letter 110.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:641–642
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Severus and his other friends to shield him from requests for further writings, since he owes his time first to all.

### Latin text

Quod enim uis, ut ad te prolixam epistulam scribam, et hoc quidem debeo, fateor; debeo prorsus hoc tam dulci, tam sincerae, tam merae uoluntati tuae. sed quia bonus es amator iustitiae, inde te admoneo, ut de illa, quam diligis, hoc a me libentius audias. cernis prius esse, quod et tibi et aliis quam quod tibi tantum modo debeo; et tempus ad omnia mihi non sufficit, quando nec ad illa, quae priora sunt. unde omnes carissimi et familiarissimi mei, quorum in nomine Christi inter primos mihi es, rem facient officii sui, si non solum mihi alia scribenda ipsi non inponant, uerum etiam ceteros quanta possunt auctoritate et sancta benignitate prohibeant, ne uidear ego durus, cum a singulis petita non dedero, dum ea magis uolo reddere, quae omnibus debeo. denique cum, sicut speramus et promissum tenemus, ad nos uenerit uenerabilitas tua, scies, quibus operibus litterarum et quantum occupatus sim, et instantius facies, quod rogaui, ut et alios, quos potueris, mihi aliquid aliud scribendum uolentes iniungere a me demoliaris. dominus deus noster impleat cordis tui tam grandem et tam sanctum sinum, quem ipse fecit,. domine beatissime.

### English translation (Claude)

As for your wish that I write you a long letter, this too I owe, I confess; I owe it wholly to your will, so sweet, so sincere, so pure. But since you are a good lover of justice, I remind you of this from justice itself, so that you may hear it from me more willingly about the justice you love. You see that what I owe both to you and to others comes before what I owe to you alone; and my time is not sufficient for everything, since it is not sufficient even for the things that come first. Hence all my dearest and most intimate friends, among whom in the name of Christ you are among the first, will be doing their duty if they not only do not themselves lay other writing on me, but also, with all the authority and holy kindness they can, forbid others, lest I seem harsh when I do not give individuals what they ask, because I wish rather to pay what I owe to all. Finally, when Your Venerableness comes to us, as we hope and as we hold you to your promise, you will know with what literary works and how much I am occupied, and you will more urgently do what I have asked: fend off from me any others you can who want to lay on me something else to write. May the Lord our God fill the so great and so holy bosom of your heart, which he himself made, most blessed lord.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 110.6 (CSEL 34.2:641–642; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/108-16/#p-110-6).

## Letter 111.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:642–644
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to the presbyter Victorianus that disasters afflict the whole world, including the violence of the Donatists and Circumcellions around Hippo.

### Latin text

Litterae tuae impleuerunt grandi dolore cor nostrum, quibus petisti, ut prolixo opere aliqua responderem, cum talibus malis magis prolixi gemitus et fletus quam prolixi libri debeantur. totus quippe mundus tantis affligitur cladibus, ut paene pars nulla terrarum sit, ubi non talia, qualia scripsisti, committantur atque plangantur. nam ante paruum tempus etiam in illis solitudinibus Aegypti, ubi monasteria separata ab omni strepitu quasi secura degebant, a barbaris interfecti sunt fratres. iam uero quae modo in regionibus Italiae, quae in Galliis nefaria perpetrata sint, etiam uos latere non arbitror; de Hispanis quoque tot prouinciis, quae ab his malis diu uidebantur intactae, coeperunt iam talia nuntiari. sed quid longe imus? ecce in regione nostra Hipponiensi, quoniam eam barbari non adtigerunt, clericorum Donatistarum et Circumcellionum latrocinia sic uastant ecclesias, ut barbarorum fortasse facta mitiora sint. quis enim barbarus excogitare potuit, quod isti, ut in oculos clericorum nostrorum calcem et acetum mitterent, quorum membra etiam cetera plagis horrendis uulneribusque sauciarunt? depraedantur etiam domos aliquas et incendunt, fructus aridos diripiunt, humidos fundunt et talia ceteris comminando multos etiam rebaptizari compellunt. pridie, quam ad te ista dictaui, ex uno loco per huius modi terrores XL et VIII animae mihi rebaptizatae renuntiatae sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Your letter filled our heart with great sorrow, for in it you asked me to answer certain things in a lengthy work, when such evils call for prolonged groans and weeping rather than prolonged books. For the whole world is afflicted with such great disasters that there is almost no part of the earth where such things as you wrote of are not being committed and lamented. Not long ago, even in those deserts of Egypt where monasteries, separated from all noise, lived as if in safety, brothers were killed by barbarians. As for the abominable things lately perpetrated in the regions of Italy and in the Gauls, I do not suppose they are hidden even from you; and from the Spains too, so many provinces which for a long time seemed untouched by these evils, such things have begun to be reported. But why go far? See, in our own region of Hippo, although the barbarians have not reached it, the robberies of the Donatist clergy and the Circumcellions so lay waste the churches that the deeds of the barbarians are perhaps milder. For what barbarian could have devised what these men have done, throwing lime and vinegar into the eyes of our clergy, whose other limbs too they have wounded with horrible blows and injuries? They also plunder some houses and set them on fire, carry off the dry produce, pour out the liquid, and by threatening others with such things they compel many even to be rebaptized. The day before I dictated this to you, forty-eight souls from a single place were reported to me as rebaptized through terrors of this kind.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Victorianus, a presbyter (named in the manuscripts' heading), in 409.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.1 (CSEL 34.2:642–644; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-1).

## Letter 111.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:644–645
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the calamities were foretold, and answers pagan complaints that Christianity brought them with the parable of the servant who knew his master's will.

### Latin text

Plangenda sunt haec, non miranda, et exclamandum ad deum, ut non secundum merita nostra sed secundum suam misericordiam a tantis malis liberet nos. nam quid utique sperandum fuit generi humano, cum haec et in prophetis et in euangelio tanto ante praedicta sint? non itaque debemus tam nobis ipsis esse contrarii, ut credamus, quando leguntur, et queramur, quando complentur, sed potius et illi, qui increduli fuerant, cum haec in sanctis libris conscripta legerent uel audirent, nunc saltem credere debent, cum compleri iam uident, ut de his tam magnis pressuris tamquam in torculari domini dei nostri, sicut amurca infidelium murmurantium et blasphemantium fluit, ita oleum quoque fidelium confitentium et orantium exprimi et liquari non cesset. illis enim, qui contra Christianam fidem querelas impias iactare non quiescunt dicentes, quod ante, quam ista doctrina per mundum praedicaretur, tanta mala non patiebatur genus humanum, facile est ex euangelio respondere; dominus enim dicit: Seruus nesciens uoluntatem domini sui et faciens digna plagis uapulabit pauca, seruus autem sciens uoluntatem domini sui et faciens digna plagis uapulabit multa. quid ergo mirum, si Christianis temporibus iste mundus tamquam seruus iam sciens uoluntatem domini sui et faciens digna plagis uapulat multa? adtendunt, quanta celeritate euangelium praedicatur, et non adtendunt, quanta peruersitate contemnitur. serui autem dei humiles et sancti, qui dupliciter mala temporalia patiuntur, quia et ab ipsis impiis et cum ipsis patiuntur, habent consolationes suas et spem futuri saeculi, unde dicit apostolus: Non sunt condignae passiones huius temporis ad futuram gloriam, quae reuelabitur in nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

These things are to be lamented, not wondered at; and we must cry out to God that he deliver us from such evils, not according to our merits but according to his mercy. For what else was to be expected for the human race, when these things were foretold so long before both in the prophets and in the gospel? We ought not, then, to be so contrary to ourselves as to believe them when they are read and complain when they are fulfilled; rather, even those who were unbelieving when they read or heard these things written in the holy books ought now at least to believe, when they see them being fulfilled; so that from these great pressures, as in the press of the Lord our God, just as the dregs of unbelievers who murmur and blaspheme flow out, so the oil of the faithful who confess and pray may not cease to be pressed out and run clear. For to those who do not cease to hurl impious complaints against the Christian faith, saying that before this teaching was preached throughout the world the human race did not suffer such great evils, it is easy to answer from the gospel. For the Lord says: “The servant who does not know his master's will and does things worthy of blows will be beaten with few; but the servant who knows his master's will and does things worthy of blows will be beaten with many.” What wonder is it, then, if in Christian times this world, like a servant who now knows his master's will and does things worthy of blows, is beaten with many? They notice with what speed the gospel is preached, and do not notice with what perversity it is despised. But the humble and holy servants of God, who suffer temporal evils doubly, because they suffer both at the hands of the impious and together with them, have their consolations and the hope of the world to come; hence the apostle says: “The sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that will be revealed in us.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 12:47: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 12:48: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:18: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.2 (CSEL 34.2:644–645; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-2).

## Letter 111.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:645–647
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers those who ask why God's servants suffer by quoting the confession of sins made by Azariah in the furnace.

### Latin text

Proinde, carissime, etiam illis, quorum uerba dicis te ferre non posse, quoniam dicunt: Si nos peccatores ista meruimus, quare et serui dei barbarorum ferro perempti sunt et ancillae dei captiuae ductae sunt? humiliter et ueraciter et pie responde: Quantam libet enim iustitiam seruemus, quantam libet domino oboedientiam exhibeamus, numquid meliores esse possumus tribus illis uiris, qui in camino ignis ardentis pro conseruanda dei lege proiecti sunt? et tamen lege, quid illic dicat Azarias, unus ex tribus aperiens os suum in medio ignis dixit: Benedictus es, domine deus patrum nostrorum, et laudabile et gloriosum nomen tuum in saecula, quoniam iustus es in omnibus, quae fecisti nobis, et omnia opera tua uera et rectae uiae tuae et omnia iudicia tua ueritas et iudicia ueritatis fecisti per omnia, quae intulisti nobis et ciuitati sanctae patrum nostrorum Hierusalem, quoniam in ueritate et iudicio intulisti nobis omnia haec propter peccata nostra, quoniam peccauimus et legi non paruimus et mandatis tuis non obaudiuimus, ut bene nobis esset; et omnia, quae intulisti nobis, uero iudicio intulisti et tradidisti nos in manus iniquorum inimicissimorum transfugarum et regi iniusto et pessimo ultra uniuersam terram. et nunc non est nobis, ut possimus aperire os; uere confusio et opprobrium facti sumus seruis tuis et eis, qui te colunt. ne tradideris nos in perpetuum, domine, propter nomen tuum et ne despexeris testamentum tuum et ne abstuleris misericordiam tuam a nobis propter Abraham, qui a te dilectus est, et propter Isaac seruum tuum et Israhel sanctum tuum, quibus locutus es multiplicaturum te semen eorum ut astra caeli et harenam maris, quoniam, domine, minimi facti sumus prae omnibus nationibus et sumus humiles hodie in terra propter peccata nostra. uides certe, frater, quales uiri, quam sancti, quam fortes in media tribulatione, ubi tamen eis parcebatur et eos urere ipsa flamma uerebatur, peccata sua confitebantur, pro quibus se digne et iuste humiliari nouerant nec tacebant.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, dearest brother, to those also whose words you say you cannot bear, because they say, “If we sinners deserved these things, why were the servants of God also slain by the sword of the barbarians, and the handmaids of God led away captive?”, answer humbly, truthfully, and piously: However much righteousness we keep, however much obedience we show the Lord, can we be better than those three men who were thrown into the furnace of burning fire for keeping the law of God? And yet read what Azariah says there. One of the three, opening his mouth in the midst of the fire, said: “Blessed are you, O Lord, God of our fathers, and your name is praiseworthy and glorious for ever; for you are just in all that you have done to us, and all your works are true and your ways right and all your judgments truth; and you have executed judgments of truth in all that you have brought upon us and upon Jerusalem, the holy city of our fathers; for in truth and judgment you have brought all these things upon us because of our sins; for we have sinned and have not obeyed the law and have not hearkened to your commandments, that it might be well with us. And all that you have brought upon us you have brought by a true judgment, and you have delivered us into the hands of lawless enemies, most hateful deserters, and to an unjust king, the worst in all the earth. And now we cannot open our mouth; truly we have become a shame and a reproach to your servants and to those who worship you. Do not give us up for ever, O Lord, for your name's sake, and do not reject your covenant, and do not take away your mercy from us, for the sake of Abraham, who is loved by you, and for the sake of Isaac your servant and Israel your holy one, to whom you said that you would multiply their seed as the stars of heaven and as the sand of the sea; for, O Lord, we have become the least of all nations, and we are humbled today in the earth because of our sins.” You see, brother, what men these were, how holy, how brave in the midst of tribulation, where nevertheless they were spared and the very flame was afraid to burn them; yet they confessed their sins, for which they knew they were deservedly and justly humbled, and did not keep silent.

### Scripture references

- Dan 3:20: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pr Azar 3-14 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The prayer is from the Greek additions to Daniel (Prayer of Azariah 3–14).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.3 (CSEL 34.2:645–647; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-3).

## Letter 111.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:647–651
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Daniel's prayer of confession in captivity to show that even the holiest acknowledge that God justly chastises them for their sins.

### Latin text

Numquid etiam meliores esse possumus ipso Danihele, de quo per Ezechielem prophetam dicit dominus ad principem Tyri: Numquid tu sapientior quam Danihel? et qui ponitur unus in tribus iustis, quos dicit deus solos se liberaturum ostendens utique in illis tres quasdam formas iustorum, quos ita se liberaturum dicit, ut nec filios suos secum liberent, sed ipsi soli liberentur, Noe, Danihel et Iob? lege tamen etiam precem Danihelis et uide, quem ad modum in captiuitate positus peccata non tantum populi sui uerum etiam sua confiteatur et pro his dicat per iustitiam dei se ad illam captiuitatis poenam et opprobria peruenisse. sic enim scriptum est: Et dedi faciem meam ad dominum deum, ut quaererem preces et obsecrationes in ieiunationibus et sacco, et precatus sum dominum deum meum et confessus sum et dixi: Domine deus magne et mirabilis, qui seruas testamentum tuum et misericordiam diligentibus te et seruantibus praecepta tua, peccauimus, aduersus legem fecimus, impie egimus et recessimus et declinauimus a praeceptis tuis et a iudiciis tuis et non exaudiuimus seruos tuos prophetas, qui loquebantur in nomine tuo ad reges nostros et ad omnem populum terrae. tibi, domine, iustitia, nobis autem confusio faciei, sicut dies hic, uiro Iuda et habitantibus Hierusalem et omni Israhel, qui proximi sunt et qui longe sunt in omni terra, in qua eos disseminasti ibi propter contumaciam eorum, quia inprobauerunt te, domine. nobis confusio faciei et regibus nostris et principibus nostris et patribus nostris, qui peccauimus. tibi domino deo nostro miserationes et propitiationes, quoniam recessimus et non audiuimus uocem domini dei nostri, ut essemus in praeceptis legis huius, quae dedit in conspectu nostro in manus seruorum eius prophetarum. et omnis Israhel peccauerunt aduersus legem tuam et declinauerunt, ne audirent uocem tuam, et superuenit nobis maledictio et iusiurandum, quod scriptum est in lege Moysi serui dei, quoniam peccauimus, et statuit sermones suos, quos locutus est ad nos et ad iudices nostros, qui iudicabant nos superducere in nos mala magna, quae numquam facta sunt sub omni caelo secundum ea, quae facta sunt in Hierusalem; sicut scriptum est in lege Moysi, omnia mala haec uenerunt ad nos et non rogauimus dominum deum nostrum, ut auerteret a nobis delicta nostra et ut intellegeremus omnem ueritatem tuam. et uigilauit dominus deus ad omnem sanctum suum et perduxit ea, quae fecit, ad nos, quoniam iustus dominus deus noster in omni mundo suo, quem fecit, et non audiuimus uocem eius. et nunc, domine deus noster, qui eduxisti populum tuum de terra Aegypti in manu forti et fecisti tibi nomen, sicut dies hic, delicta aduersus legem tuam fecimus. domine, in omni misericordia tua auertatur itaque impetus tuus et ira tua a ciuitate tua Hierusalem et monte sancto tuo. propter peccata enim nostra et iniquitates patrum nostrorum Hierusalem et populus tuus in confusionem uenit omnibus, qui circa nos sunt. et nunc exaudi, deus, preces serui tui et orationem eius et ostende nobis faciem tuam ad sanctificationem tuam, quae deserta est. propter te inclina, domine deus meus, aurem tuam et exaudi; aperi oculos tuos et uide interitum nostrum et ciuitatis tuae Hierusalem, ad quam inuocatum est nomen tuum super eam, quoniam non in nostra iustitia iactauimus precem nostram in conspectu tuo sed ad misericordiam tuam, quae magna est. exaudi, domine, propitiare, domine, intende, domine, et ne tardaueris propter te, deus meus, quoniam nomen tuum inuocatum est in ciuitatem tuam et populum tuum. et adhuc me loquente et orante et enumerante peccata mea et peccata populi mei —. uide quem ad modum sua peccata prius dixit et postea populi sui. et hanc dei commendat iustitiam et hanc dei laudem dicit, quia non iniuste sed pro peccatis eorum flagellat etiam ipsos sanctos suos. si ergo ista dicunt, qui excellentissima sanctitate ignes et leones circa se innoxios habuerunt, quid nos oportet dicere in humilitate nostra, qui tam longe illis inpares sumus, quantamcumque iustitiam seruare uideamur?

### English translation (Claude)

Can we even be better than Daniel himself, of whom the Lord says through the prophet Ezekiel to the prince of Tyre, “Are you wiser than Daniel?”, and who is placed as one of the three righteous men whom God says he alone will deliver, showing in them, surely, three types of righteous men, whom he says he will deliver in such a way that they will not deliver even their sons with them, but they alone will be delivered: Noah, Daniel, and Job? Yet read the prayer of Daniel too, and see how, placed in captivity, he confesses the sins not only of his people but also his own, and says that because of them, by the justice of God, he has come to that punishment and reproach of captivity. For it is written thus: “And I set my face to the Lord God, to seek him by prayers and supplications with fastings and sackcloth; and I prayed to the Lord my God and confessed and said: O Lord God, great and wonderful, who keep your covenant and mercy for those who love you and keep your commandments, we have sinned, we have acted against the law, we have done wickedly, and we have departed and turned aside from your commandments and from your judgments, and we have not listened to your servants the prophets, who spoke in your name to our kings and to all the people of the land. To you, O Lord, belongs righteousness, but to us confusion of face, as at this day, to the men of Judah and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and to all Israel, those who are near and those who are far off, in every land into which you have scattered them because of their stubbornness, because they rejected you, O Lord. To us belongs confusion of face, and to our kings and our princes and our fathers, who have sinned. To you, the Lord our God, belong compassion and forgiveness, for we have departed and have not listened to the voice of the Lord our God, to walk in the precepts of this law which he set before us by the hands of his servants the prophets. And all Israel have sinned against your law and turned aside so as not to hear your voice; and the curse and the oath written in the law of Moses the servant of God have come upon us, because we have sinned; and he has confirmed his words, which he spoke against us and against our judges who judged us, to bring upon us great evils, such as have never been done under the whole heaven as have been done in Jerusalem. As it is written in the law of Moses, all these evils have come upon us, and we did not entreat the Lord our God to turn our offenses away from us and that we might understand all your truth. And the Lord God kept watch over all that is holy to him and brought upon us what he has done; for the Lord our God is righteous in all his world which he made, and we have not listened to his voice. And now, O Lord our God, who brought your people out of the land of Egypt with a strong hand and made a name for yourself, as at this day, we have committed offenses against your law. O Lord, in all your mercy let your fury and your anger be turned away from your city Jerusalem and your holy mountain; for because of our sins and the iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and your people have become a reproach to all who are around us. And now hear, O God, the prayers of your servant and his supplication, and show us your face for the sake of your sanctuary, which is desolate. For your own sake, O Lord my God, incline your ear and hear; open your eyes and see our ruin and that of your city Jerusalem, over which your name has been called; for we have not cast our prayer before you on the ground of our righteousness but on your mercy, which is great. Hear, O Lord; be merciful, O Lord; attend, O Lord, and do not delay, for your own sake, my God; for your name has been called upon your city and your people. And while I was still speaking and praying and recounting my sins and the sins of my people …” See how he spoke first of his own sins and afterward of his people's. And he commends this justice of God and speaks this praise of God, that not unjustly but for their sins he scourges even his own saints. If, then, those say such things who by their most excellent holiness had fire and lions harmless around them, what ought we to say in our lowliness, who are so far unequal to them, however much righteousness we may seem to keep?

### Scripture references

- Ezek 28:3: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 14:14: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 14:16: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 9:3: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:4: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:5: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:6: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:7: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:8: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:9: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:10: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:11: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:17: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:18: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 6:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Daniel's prayer is quoted in the Old Latin form of the Greek text, which differs at points from the Hebrew (e.g. “kept watch over all that is holy to him”, Dan 9:14; sense uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.4 (CSEL 34.2:647–651; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-4).

## Letter 111.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:651–652
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that God delivered Daniel and the three men to convert their kings, but not the Maccabean martyrs, who also confessed that they suffered for their sins.

### Latin text

Sed ne aliquis existimet illos dei seruos, quos dicis a barbaris interfectos, sic illam mortem euadere debuisse, quo modo tres illi uiri ab ignibus et Danihel a leonibus liberatus est, sciant illa propterea facta miracula, ut eos uerum deum colere crederent reges, a quibus in illa supplicia tradebantur. hoc enim erat in occulto iudicio et misericordia dei, ut illis regibus eo modo consuleret ad salutem. Antiocho autem regi, qui Machabaeos poenis crudelibus interemit, noluit ita consulere, sed eorum gloriosissimis passionibus cor duri regis acriore seueritate puniuit. lege tamen, etiam unus illorum, qui sexto loco patiebatur, quid dicat; ita enim scriptum est: Et post hunc sextum applicauerunt. cum hic tormentis excruciatus moreretur, dixit: Noli te seducere; propter nos haec patimur peccantes in deum nostrum et facta sunt haec digna nobis. tu autem noli te putare inpunitum futurum, qui aduersus deum et legem eius legibus tuis pugnare uoluisti. uides etiam, isti quam humiliter et ueraciter sapiant, qui pro suis peccatis se flagellari a domino confitentur, de quo scriptum est: Quem enim diligit dominus, corripit; flagellat autem omnem filium, quem recipit. unde et apostolus dicit: Si enim nos ipsos iudicaremus, a domino non iudicaremur; cum iudicamur autem a domino, corripimur, ne cum mundo damnemur.

### English translation (Claude)

But lest anyone think that those servants of God whom you say were killed by barbarians ought to have escaped that death in the way that the three men were delivered from the fire and Daniel from the lions, let them know that those miracles were done so that the kings by whom they were handed over to those punishments might believe that they worshiped the true God. For this was in the hidden judgment and mercy of God, to provide for the salvation of those kings in this way. But for King Antiochus, who killed the Maccabees with cruel tortures, he did not will to provide in this way; rather, by their most glorious sufferings he punished the hard king's heart with sharper severity. Yet read what one of them, who suffered in the sixth place, says; for thus it is written: “And after him they brought the sixth. When he was dying, racked by torments, he said: Do not deceive yourself; we suffer these things because of ourselves, since we have sinned against our God, and these things have come upon us deservedly. But do not think that you will go unpunished, you who have chosen to fight with your laws against God and his law.” You see how humbly and truthfully these men too think, who confess that they are scourged for their sins by the Lord, of whom it is written: “For whom the Lord loves he reproves; and he scourges every son whom he receives.” Hence the apostle also says: “For if we judged ourselves, we would not be judged by the Lord; but when we are judged by the Lord, we are corrected, so that we may not be condemned with the world.”

### Scripture references

- Heb 12:6: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 3:12: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 11:31: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:32: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 7:18-19 (2 Maccabees): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Macc 7:18–19, quoted in an Old Latin form.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.5 (CSEL 34.2:651–652; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-5).

## Letter 111.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:652–653
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Victorianus to forbid murmuring against God, since it matters not how God's servants die but in what state they go to him.

### Latin text

Haec fideliter lege, fideliter praedica et, quantum potes, cane et cauendum doce, ne aduersus deum in his temptationibus et tribulationibus murmuretur. bonos dicis dei seruos et fideles et sanctos gladio barbarorum peremptos. quid autem interest, utrum eos febris an ferrum de corpore solueret? non qua occasione exeant, sed quales ad se exeant, deus adtendit in seruis suis, nisi quod maiorem habet poenam languor diuturnus quam citissimus exitus; et tamen etiam ipsum languorem diuturnum et horrendum legimus, qualem passus est ille Iob, cuius certe iustitiae deus ipse, qui falli non potest, tale perhibet testimonium.

### English translation (Claude)

Read these things faithfully, preach them faithfully, and, as far as you can, beware yourself and teach others to beware, lest there be murmuring against God in these temptations and tribulations. You say that good, faithful, and holy servants of God were slain by the sword of the barbarians. But what does it matter whether fever or the sword released them from the body? God looks, in his servants, not at the occasion by which they depart but at what kind of people they are when they depart to him; except that a long illness carries a greater penalty than a very swift death. And yet we read of even such a long and horrible illness as that which Job suffered, to whose righteousness God himself, who cannot be deceived, bears such testimony.

### Scripture references

- Job 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- Job 2:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.6 (CSEL 34.2:652–653; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-6).

## Letter 111.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:653–654
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine comforts Victorianus about captive consecrated women, telling how a captive nun's prayers healed her captors and won her release.

### Latin text

Grauissima sane et multum dolenda est illa captiuitas feminarum castarum atque sanctarum, sed non est captiuus deus earum nec captiuas deserit suas, si nouit suas. nam et illi sancti, quorum passiones et confessiones de scripturis sanctis commemoraui, ab hostibus ducti atque in captiuitate positi illa dixerunt, quae conscripta legerentur a nobis et disceremus captiuos dei seruos non deseri a domino suo. unde autem scimus, quid etiam per istas omnipotens et misericors deus in ipsa terra barbarica fieri uelit mirabilium suorum? tantum non cessetis pro illis ingemescere ad deum et quaerere, quantum potestis et quantum ipse permittit, cum tempus et facultatem dederit, quid de illis factum sit uel quae uestra possint habere solatia. nam de Sitifensi ante paucos annos Seueri episcopi neptis sanctimonialis a barbaris ducta est et per mirabilem dei misericordiam cum honore magno suis parentibus restituta est. domus enim illa barbarorum, ubi captiua ingressa est, subita coepit dominorum infirmitate iactari, ita ut omnes ipsi barbari, tres, nisi fallor, uel amplius fratres, periculosissima aegritudine laborarent. quorum mater animaduertit puellam deo deditam et credidit, quod eius orationibus sui filii possent ab imminentis iam mortis periculo liberari; petiuit, ut oraret pro eis, pollicens, quod, si salui facti essent, eam suis parentibus redderent. ieiunauit illa et orauit et exaudita continuo est; ad hoc enim factum erat, quantum exitus docuit. ita illi tam repentino dei beneficio salute percepta mirantes et honorantes, quod eorum mater promiserat, impleuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Most grievous indeed and greatly to be lamented is that captivity of chaste and holy women; but their God is not captive, nor does he desert his own in captivity, if he knows them as his own. For those saints too, whose sufferings and confessions I have recalled from the holy Scriptures, said those things when they had been led away by enemies and placed in captivity, so that they might be read by us in writing and we might learn that captive servants of God are not deserted by their Lord. And how do we know what wonders of his the almighty and merciful God may will to work through these women too in that barbarian land? Only do not cease to groan to God for them, and to seek out, as far as you can and as far as he permits, when he gives time and opportunity, what has become of them, or what comforts you can give them. For a few years ago a granddaughter of Bishop Severus, a nun, was carried off by barbarians from the territory of Sitifis, and by the wonderful mercy of God was restored to her parents with great honor. For the house of the barbarians into which she entered as a captive began to be shaken by a sudden sickness of its masters, so that all those barbarians, three brothers or more, if I am not mistaken, labored under a most dangerous illness. Their mother noticed that the girl was dedicated to God and believed that by her prayers her sons could be delivered from the danger of death that now threatened; she asked her to pray for them, promising that, if they were made well, they would return her to her parents. She fasted and prayed and was heard at once; for this was why it had happened, as the outcome showed. So they, having received health by so sudden a kindness of God, wondering at her and honoring her, fulfilled what their mother had promised.

### Translation notes

- Neptis can mean “granddaughter” or “niece”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.7 (CSEL 34.2:653–654; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-7).

## Letter 111.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:654–656
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Victorianus to pray that the captive women may offer God the sacrifice of a humble spirit, as Azariah did when no sacrifice was possible.

### Latin text

Ora ergo dominum pro eis et roga, ut etiam ipsas doceat talia dicere, qualia supra memoratus sanctus Azarias inter cetera in oratione et confessione sua fudit ad deum. sic enim sunt illae in terra captiuitatis suae, quo modo erant illi in ea terra, ubi nec sacrificare more suo poterant domino, sicut nec istae possunt, uel ferre oblationem ad altare dei uel inuenire ibi sacerdotem, per quem offerant deo. donet ergo eis dominus, ut ei dicant, quod Azarias dixit in consequentibus precum suarum: Non est in hoc tempore princeps et propheta et dux, non holocausta neque oblatio neque supplicationes nec locus ad sacrificandum in conspectu tuo et inuenire misericordiam, sed in anima contribulata et spiritu humilitatis accipiamur. sicut in holocaustomatibus arietum et taurorum et in multitudine agnorum pinguium sic fiat sacrificium nostrum in conspectu tuo hodie et perficere subsequentes te, quoniam non erit confusio his, qui in te confidunt. et nunc sequimur in toto corde et timemus te et quaerimus faciem tuam. ne confundas nos, sed fac nobiscum secundum mansuetudinem tuam et secundum multitudinem misericordiae tuae et libera nos secundum mirabilia tua et da gloriam nomini tuo, domine, et uereantur omnes, qui ostendunt seruis tuis mala, et confundantur ab omni potentia et uirtus eorum conteratur; sciant, quoniam tu es dominus deus solus et gloriosus in uniuerso orbe terrae.

### English translation (Claude)

Pray to the Lord for them, then, and ask that he teach them too to say such things as the holy Azariah, mentioned above, poured out to God, among others, in his prayer and confession. For they are in the land of their captivity as those men were in that land where they could not sacrifice to the Lord in their own way, just as these women cannot bring an offering to the altar of God or find a priest there through whom to offer to God. May the Lord grant them, then, to say to him what Azariah said in the following part of his prayer: “There is at this time no prince or prophet or leader, no burnt offering or oblation or supplications, nor any place to sacrifice before you and to find mercy; but with a troubled soul and a spirit of humility let us be accepted. As in burnt offerings of rams and bulls and in multitudes of fat lambs, so let our sacrifice be in your sight today, and let us follow you fully, for there will be no shame for those who trust in you. And now we follow you with all our heart, and we fear you and seek your face. Do not put us to shame, but deal with us according to your gentleness and according to the multitude of your mercy, and deliver us according to your wonders, and give glory to your name, O Lord; and let all who do harm to your servants be put to shame, and let them be confounded in all their power, and let their strength be broken; let them know that you alone are the Lord God, glorious over the whole world.”

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pr Azar 15-22 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Prayer of Azariah 15–22 (Greek additions to Daniel).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.8 (CSEL 34.2:654–656; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-8).

## Letter 111.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:656–657
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine teaches that women who suffer rape without consent remain chaste, since the guilt is the attacker's alone.

### Latin text

Haec illis dicentibus et ad deum ingemescentibus omnino suis aderit, qui suis adesse consueuit, et aut nihil in earum castissimis membris libidine hostili perpetrari permittit aut, si permittit, cum earum animus nulla consensionis turpitudine maculatur, etiam carnem suam defendit a crimine et, quicquid in ea nec commisit nec permisit libido patientis, solius erit culpa facientis omnisque illa uiolentia non pro corruptionis turpitudine sed pro passionis uulnere deputabitur. tantum enim ualet in mente integritas castitatis, ut illa inuiolata nec in corpore possit pudicitia uiolari, cuius membra potuerint superari. haec epistula pro tuo desiderio breuis, pro meis tamen occupationibus multum prolixa et propter perlatoris festinationem nimis accelerata sufficiat caritati tuae. multo uberius uos dominus consolabitur, si scripturas eius intentissime legeritis.

### English translation (Claude)

When they say these things and groan to God, he who is wont to be present to his own will surely be present to them. Either he permits nothing to be perpetrated on their most chaste bodies by the lust of the enemy, or, if he permits it, since their mind is stained by no baseness of consent, he defends even their flesh from guilt; and whatever lust has committed in it, without the sufferer either committing or permitting it, will be the fault of the doer alone, and all that violence will be reckoned not as the baseness of corruption but as the wound of suffering. For so great is the power of the integrity of chastity in the mind that, while it remains inviolate, modesty cannot be violated even in the body, though its members could be overpowered. Let this letter, short in view of your desire, but very long in view of my occupations, and much hurried because of the haste of the bearer, suffice for your charity. The Lord will console you far more abundantly if you read his Scriptures most attentively.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 111.9 (CSEL 34.2:656–657; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-111-9).

## Letter 112.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:657
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the former official Donatus, regretting that he could not meet him while in office and urging him to seek heavenly rather than earthly glory.

### Latin text

Quod te administrantem multum desiderans, etiam cum Tibilim uenisses, uidere non potui, credo propterea factum esse, ut animo tuo curis publicis expedito potius fruerer, quam ut illa salutatio me apud te otioso et te negotioso neutri nostrum, quantum satis esset, desiderium temperaret. recolens quippe honestatem atque probitatem ab ineunte aetate indolis tuae abundanter idoneum tuum pectus existimo, cui se Christus largissime infundat, ut fructus ei adferas aeterna et caelesti gloria quam temporali et terreno praeconio digniores.

### English translation (Claude)

That I could not see you during your administration, though I greatly desired it, even when you had come to Tibilis, happened, I believe, so that I might rather enjoy your mind when it was free of public cares, than that a greeting, with me at leisure and you busy, should fail to satisfy the longing of either of us as fully as it deserved. For, recalling the honor and uprightness of your character from your early youth, I consider your heart abundantly fit for Christ to pour himself into most generously, so that you may bring him fruits worthy of eternal and heavenly glory rather than of temporal and earthly praise.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 112.1 (CSEL 34.2:657; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-1).

## Letter 112.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:657–658
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports the universal praise of Donatus's administration and reminds him that true worth lies in the deeds themselves, not in popular fame.

### Latin text

A multis enim, immo prorsus ab omnibus, quos uel percontari uel ultro etiam praedicantes audire potui, castitatem uirtutemque administrationis tuae constanter omnino laudantibus atque praeferentibus et sine ullo scrupulo dissonae uarietatis accepi et eo certius, quod ignorabant necessitudinem nostram et, utrum te uel tenuiter nossem, penitus nesciebant praedicatores tui, ne magis eos auribus meis se dedisse quam uera de te spargere crederem. ibi enim est a uanitate remota laudatio, ubi etiam uituperatio ab offensione secura est. uerum tamen, o frater eximie et sincerissima dilectione honorabilis, non nunc docendus es, sed fortasse admonendus tamen omnem istam gloriam famamque popularem non in ore uulgi esse laetabilem sed in rebus ipsis, quae, etiam si uulgo displiceant, proprio tamen fulgore ac pondere non inperitorum commendatione pretiosae sunt, magisque miserandus est, qui talia inprobat, quam ille, qui de talibus inprobatur, iudicandus miser. cum uero placent et sibi debita laude populariter quoque praedicantur, ne sic quidem ipsae maiores melioresque fiunt alieno iudicio, quoniam integrantur intima ueritate et solius conscientiae robore solidantur. unde magis hominibus recte existimantibus quam ei, de quo bene uulgus existimat, aliquid ex eo felicitatis accedit.

### English translation (Claude)

For from many, indeed from absolutely all whom I could either question or hear proclaiming it of their own accord, I have heard the integrity and excellence of your administration praised and extolled with complete constancy and without any hint of discordant variety; and all the more surely because your heralds did not know of our connection and were wholly unaware whether I knew you even slightly, so that I could not suspect that they were humoring my ears rather than spreading the truth about you. For praise is free from vanity where blame too is safe from giving offense. Nevertheless, O excellent brother, honorable with most sincere love, you do not need to be taught now, but perhaps to be reminded, that all this glory and popular fame is not to be rejoiced in on the lips of the crowd but in the things themselves, which, even if they displease the crowd, are precious by their own brightness and weight, not by the commendation of the unskilled; and he who disapproves of such things is more to be pitied than he who is disapproved of for such things is to be judged wretched. But when they do please and are proclaimed popularly with their due praise, not even so do they become greater or better by another's judgment, since they are made whole by inner truth and made solid by the strength of conscience alone. Hence whatever happiness comes from it accrues to the men who judge rightly rather than to the man of whom the crowd judges well.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 112.2 (CSEL 34.2:657–658; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-2).

## Letter 112.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:658–659
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Donatus to look to Christ and to encourage his people around Siniti and Hippo to join the Catholic Church.

### Latin text

Quae cum optime noueris, uir bone, intuere, ut coepisti. fortissima cordis acie dominum nostrum Iesum Christum et ab omni inani fastu omnino detumescens adsurge in illum, qui non uentose alleuat conuersos ad se, sed certis fidei passibus innitentes atque ascendentes conlocat in sempiterno fastigio caelestis atque angelicae dignitatis. per quem te obsecro, ut rescribas mihi tuosque omnes, quos in Sinitensi uel in Hipponiensi habes, ad catholicae ecclesiae communionem comiter et benigne adhorteris. in cuius gremio etiam patrem tuum, laudabilem et egregium uirum, abs te genitum esse cognoui. quem ut debito meritis eius a me officio salutes peto et nos uisere non graueris. quod etiam propter rem tuam, quam hic habes, meliorem apud deum faciendam non inpudenter exposco. dei misericordia te circumplectatur et ab omni iniquitate conseruet.

### English translation (Claude)

Since you know these things very well, good sir, look, as you have begun, with the strongest gaze of your heart on our Lord Jesus Christ; and, wholly subsiding from all empty pride, rise up to him who does not lift up with wind those who turn to him, but sets those who lean on the sure steps of faith and climb by them on the everlasting summit of heavenly and angelic dignity. Through him I beseech you to write back to me, and to exhort courteously and kindly all your people whom you have in the territory of Siniti or of Hippo to the communion of the Catholic Church, in whose bosom I have learned that your father too, a praiseworthy and excellent man, was begotten by you. I ask that you greet him for me with the respect due to his merits, and that you not be reluctant to visit us. This I ask, not shamelessly, for the sake of your property here too, that it may be put in a better state before God. May the mercy of God embrace you and preserve you from all iniquity.

### Translation notes

- “Begotten by you”: Donatus had apparently brought his own father into the Catholic Church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 112.3 (CSEL 34.2:658–659; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-112-3).

## Letter 113.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-113-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:659–660
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Cresconius to ensure that Faventius, seized after taking refuge in the church, receives the thirty days' grace granted by imperial law.

### Latin text

Si ab ista causa dissimulauero, de qua tuae religioni ecce iterum scribo, non solum eximietas tua sed etiam ipse, quisquis ille est, in cuius causa Fauentius sic raptus est, merito me culpabit et recte reprehendet iudicans utique, si etiam ipse ad auxilium ecclesiae confugisset, si ei simile aliquid accidisset, ita me fuisse ab eius necessitate et tribulatione dissimulaturum. deinde, si hominum existimatio contemnenda est, ipsi domino deo nostro quid dicam et quam rationem reddam, si, quantum possum, non egero pro eius salute, qui se ecclesiae, cui seruio, tuendum adiuuandumque commisit, domine dilectissime et uenerabilis fili? rogo itaque benignitatem tuam, quoniam difficile et incredibile est, ut non iam uel noueris uel nosse possis, in qua causa detentus sit, hoc interim apud apparitorem, qui eum tenet, petitionem meam adiuuare digneris ut faciat, quod imperatoris lege praecipitur, ut eum apud acta municipalia interrogari faciat, utrum sibi uelit dies triginta concedi, quibus agat sub moderata custodia in ea ciuitate, in qua detentus est, ut sua ordinet sumptusque prouideat. quorum dierum spatio tua nobis adnitente beniuolentia si eius causam amica disceptatione finire potuerimus, gratulabimur; si autem non potuerimus, inueniet eum exitus iudiciorum, qui placuerit deo secundum causae ipsius meritum uel domini omnipotentissimi uoluntatem.

### English translation (Claude)

If I were to ignore this case, about which, see, I am writing again to Your Religiousness, not only Your Excellency but also the man himself, whoever he is, in whose case Faventius was seized in this way, would rightly blame me and justly reproach me, judging that, if he himself had fled to the help of the church and something similar had happened to him, I would have ignored his need and tribulation in the same way. Then, even if men's opinion is to be despised, what shall I say to the Lord our God himself, and what account shall I give, if I do not do all I can for the safety of one who has entrusted himself to the church I serve, to be protected and helped, my most beloved lord and venerable son? I ask Your Kindness, therefore, since it is difficult and incredible that you do not already know, or could not know, in what case he is held, in the meantime to deign to support my petition with the apparitor who holds him, that he do what the emperor's law enjoins: that he have him asked, before the municipal records, whether he wishes to be granted thirty days, to spend under moderate custody in the city where he is held, so as to set his affairs in order and provide for his expenses. If within the space of those days, with your goodwill assisting us, we can end his case by friendly settlement, we shall rejoice; if we cannot, the outcome of the trials will find him which pleases God, according to the merits of the case itself or the will of the almighty Lord.

### Translation notes

- The addressee is named in the manuscripts' heading (Cresconius). The law gave persons summoned to trial the option of thirty days under light custody to arrange their affairs.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 113.1 (CSEL 34.2:659–660; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-113-1).

## Letter 114.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-114-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:660–661
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the officer Florentinus, who seized Faventius, sending him again the imperial law on the thirty days' grace and asking him to observe it.

### Latin text

Cuius potestatis iussione Fauentium rapueris, ipse uideris: hoc autem scio, quod omnis potestas sub imperio constituta imperatoris sui legibus seruit. quamuis ergo iam per fratrem et conpresbyterum meum Caelestinum miserim legem, quam quidem et ante, quam mitterem, ignorare utique non deberes, qua concessum est eis, qui praecipiuntur ab aliqua potestate iudiciis exhiberi, ut ad gesta municipalia perducantur atque illic interrogentur, utrum uelint triginta dies in ea ciuitate, ubi tenentur, agere sub moderata custodia ad parandos sibi fructus uel rem suam, sicut necesse fuerit, ordinandam, quae lex, sicut mihi memoratus presbyter renuntiauit, tuae religioni recitata est, tamen etiam nunc eam cum his litteris identidem misi non terrens sed rogans et pro homine humane et episcopali misericordia, quantum ipsa permittit humanitas et pietas, intercedens, domine fili, ut et hoc existimationi tuae et petitioni meae praestare digneris et, quod lex imperatoris iubet, cuius rei publicae militas, meo quoque interuentu et deprecatione accedente facere non graueris.

### English translation (Claude)

By the order of what authority you seized Faventius is for you to consider; but this I know, that every authority established under the empire serves the laws of its emperor. I have already sent, through my brother and fellow presbyter Caelestinus, the law (of which, indeed, even before I sent it, you certainly ought not to have been ignorant) by which it is granted to those whom some authority orders to be produced before the courts that they be brought before the municipal records and there asked whether they wish to spend thirty days, in the city where they are held, under moderate custody, to procure supplies for themselves or to set their affairs in order as needed; and, as the presbyter I mentioned reported to me, this law was read out to Your Religiousness. Nevertheless I have now sent it again with this letter, not threatening but asking, interceding for a man with humanity and with a bishop's mercy, as far as humanity and piety themselves permit, my lord son: that you deign to grant this both to your own reputation and to my petition, and that you not be reluctant to do what the law of the emperor in whose state service you serve commands, with my intervention and entreaty added.

### Translation notes

- The addressee is named in the manuscripts' heading (Florentinus); cf. 115.1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 114.1 (CSEL 34.2:660–661; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-114-1).

## Letter 115.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-115-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:661–663
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Bishop Fortunatus how Faventius was seized after taking refuge in the church, and asks him to deliver a letter to the governor requesting a delay of the trial.

### Latin text

Fauentium bene nouit sanctitas tua, qui Paratianensis saltus conductor fuit. is cum ab eiusdem possessionis domino nescio quid sibi metueret, ad Hipponiensem confugit ecclesiam et ibi erat, ut confugientes solent, expectans, quo modo per intercessionem nostram sua negotia terminaret. qui, ut saepe fit, per dies singulos minus minusque sollicitus et quasi aduersario cessante securus cum ab amico suo de cena egrederetur, subito raptus est a Florentino quodam, ut dicunt, comitis officiali per armatorum manum, quanta eis ad hoc factum sufficere uisa est. quod cum mihi nuntiatum esset et adhuc, quo uel a quibus raptus fuerit, nesciretur, suspicio tamen esset de illo, quem metuens se per ecclesiam tuebatur, continuo misi ad tribunum, qui custodiendo litori constitutus est. misit militares; nemo potuit reperiri. sed mane cognouimus, et in qua domo fuerit et quod post galli cantum cum illo abscesserit, qui eum tenuerat. etiam illuc misi, quo dicebatur abductus. ubi memoratus officialis inuentus concedere presbytero, quem miseram, noluit, ut eum saltem uideret. alio die misi litteras petens, ut ei concederetur, quod iussit in causis talibus imperator, id est ut actis municipalibus interrogarentur, qui praecepti fuerint exhibendi, utrum uelint in ea ciuitate sub custodia moderata triginta dies agere, ut rem suam ordinent uel praeparent sumptus, id utique existimans, quod per ipsos dies possemus fortasse causam eius amica disceptatione finire. iam uero cum illo officiali profectus ductus est. sed metus est, ne forte ad consularis perductus officium mali aliquid patiatur. habet enim causam cum homine pecuniosissimo, quamuis iudicis integritas fama clarissima praedicetur. ne quid tamen apud officium pecunia praeualeat, peto sanctitatem tuam, domine dilectissime et uenerabilis frater, ut honorabili nobisque carissimo consulari digneris tradere litteras meas et has ei legere, quia bis eandem causam insinuare necessarium non esse arbitratus sum: et eius causae differat audientiam, quoniam nescio, utrum in ea nocens an innocens sit, et, quod circa eundem leges non seruatae sunt, ut sic raperetur neque, ut ab imperatore praeceptum est, ad acta municipalia perduceretur interrogandus, utrum beneficium dilationis uellet accipere, non contemnat, ut per hoc possimus cum eius aduersario rem finire.

### English translation (Claude)

Your Holiness knows Faventius well, who was the lessee of the Paratian estate. When he feared something, I know not what, from the owner of that same property, he took refuge in the church of Hippo and was there, as refugees usually are, waiting to have his affairs settled through our intercession. As often happens, he became less and less anxious from day to day and, as though his adversary had given up, felt secure; and as he was coming out from supper at a friend's house, he was suddenly seized by a certain Florentinus, an officer, they say, of the count, with a band of armed men as large as seemed to them sufficient for the deed. When this was reported to me, and it was not yet known where or by whom he had been carried off, though suspicion fell on the man against whom he was protecting himself through the church, I sent at once to the tribune who is stationed to guard the coast. He sent soldiers; no one could be found. But in the morning we learned both in what house he had been and that after cockcrow the man who had held him had left with him. I sent there too, where he was said to have been taken. There the officer I mentioned was found, and he refused to allow the presbyter whom I had sent even to see him. The next day I sent a letter asking that he be granted what the emperor ordered in such cases, namely that those who have been ordered to be produced be asked, before the municipal records, whether they wish to spend thirty days in that city under moderate custody to arrange their affairs or prepare their expenses; thinking, of course, that within those days we might perhaps end his case by friendly settlement. But he had already set out and been taken away with that officer. And there is fear that, if he is brought to the office of the consularis, he may suffer some harm. For he has a case with a very wealthy man, although the integrity of the judge is proclaimed by a most brilliant reputation. Lest money nevertheless prevail with the office staff, I ask Your Holiness, most beloved lord and venerable brother, to deign to deliver my letter to the honorable consularis, who is very dear to us, and to read him this one also, because I did not think it necessary to explain the same case twice: that he postpone the hearing of his case, since I do not know whether he is guilty or innocent in it; and that he not disregard the fact that the laws were not observed in his regard, since he was seized in this way and not brought before the municipal records, as the emperor ordered, to be asked whether he wished to accept the benefit of the delay; so that by this means we may settle the matter with his adversary.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Fortunatus, bishop of Cirta. The consularis is the provincial governor (Generosus, Ep. 116).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 115.1 (CSEL 34.2:661–663; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-115-1).

## Letter 116.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-116-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:663
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the governor Generosus to act as a just and Christian judge in the case of Faventius described in his letter to Fortunatus.

### Latin text

Laus et praedicatio administrationis tuae et fama praeclara cum me pro dilectione, quam tuis meritis beniuolentiaeque debemus, plurimum delectaret, numquam adhuc in aliquo beneficio postulando eximietati tuae mea intercessio extitit onerosa, domine dilectissime et uenerabilis fili. sed nunc quid in ciuitate, in qua ecclesiae dei seruio, factum sit, cum ex litteris, quas ad uenerabilem fratrem et coepiscopum meum Fortunatum dedi, cognouerit praestantia tua, qua fuerim necessitate compulsus, ut petitionem meam ingererem occupationibus tuis, tua benignitas peruidebit. et profecto facies, quod non solum integrum uerum etiam Christianum iudicem decet, eo circa nos animo, de quo in nomine Christi utique fuerat praesumendum.

### English translation (Claude)

Although the praise and celebration of your administration and your brilliant reputation delighted me greatly, because of the love we owe to your merits and goodwill, my intercession has never yet been a burden to Your Excellency in asking any favor, my most beloved lord and venerable son. But now, when Your Eminence has learned from the letter which I gave to my venerable brother and fellow bishop Fortunatus what has happened in the city in which I serve the church of God, your kindness will clearly see by what necessity I was compelled to press my petition upon your occupations. And you will certainly do what befits a judge who is not only upright but Christian, with that disposition toward us which in the name of Christ we were surely entitled to presume.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Generosus, governor (consularis) of Numidia; enclosed with Ep. 115.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 116.1 (CSEL 34.2:663; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-116-1).

## Letter 117.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-117-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:663–665
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Dioscorus, a young student about to sail home, begs Augustine to answer his questions on Cicero's dialogues so that he will not be thought ignorant.

### Latin text

Prooemiari apud te non solum superfluum est sed etiam molestum, qui rem non uerba desideras, ideoque simpliciter audio senex Alypius rogatus a me saepius pollicitus erat tecum respondere dialogorum pauculis interrogatiunculis et, quoniam in Mauretania dicitur hodieque esse, peto uiribus omnibus et rogo, ut tu solus respondere digneris, quod etiam praesente ipso fratre tuo sine dubio facturus eras. non est pecunia, non est aurum, quod pro quouis daturus eras procul dubio, si haberes; nunc uero sine labore loqueris, quod requiro. possem te plus et per multos caros tuos exorare, sed noui animum tuum, qui non rogari desiderat sed omnibus praestare, si tantum absit, quod dedecet, quod in hac re penitus nihil est dedecoris. tamen quodcumque est, peto praestes nauigaturo. nosti, quam mihi molestissimum est oneri esse non dico sinceritati tuae sed cuipiam. solus autem deus nouit, quo modo nimia necessitate inpulsus hoc feci. uobis enim saluis et fauente deo nauigaturus sum; et mores hominum non ignoratis, qui procliues sunt ad uituperandum, et, quam, si interrogatus quis non responderit, indoctus et hebes putabitur, uides. ergo, obsecro te, ad omnia sine cunctatione responde, ne me tristem dimittas; sic uideam parentes meos, quia propter hoc solum Cerdonem misi et ipsum expecto solum. frater Zenobius magister memoriae factus est et misit nobis euectionem cum annonis. si ego dignus non sum, ut respondeas interrogatiunculis meis, saltem timeantur annonae. incolumem te summa diuinitas longa nobis tueatur aetate. Papas plurimum dignationem tuam salutat.

### English translation (Claude)

To make a preface with you is not only superfluous but even irksome, since you want the substance, not words. So, simply: I hear that the old man Alypius, often asked by me, had promised to answer, together with you, a few little questions about the dialogues; and since he is said to be in Mauretania even now, I ask with all my strength and beg that you alone deign to answer, as you would no doubt have done even with your brother present. It is not money, it is not gold, which you would doubtless give for anyone if you had it; this time you would only be saying, without labor, what I ask. I could entreat you more, and through many who are dear to you, but I know your mind, which does not wish to be asked but to grant to all, provided only that nothing unbecoming is involved; and in this matter there is absolutely nothing unbecoming. However that may be, I ask you to grant it to me as I am about to sail. You know how very irksome it is to me to be a burden, I do not say to Your Sincerity, but to anyone. God alone knows how I have done this, driven by excessive necessity. For, with your welfare secured and God favoring, I am about to sail; and you are not ignorant of men's ways, how prone they are to find fault, and you see how, if someone who is asked does not answer, he will be thought unlearned and dull. So I beseech you, answer everything without delay, lest you send me away sad; so may I see my parents, for I have sent Cerdo for this alone and am waiting only for him. Brother Zenobius has been made master of the records and has sent us a travel warrant with provisions. If I am not worthy of your answering my little questions, at least have regard for the provisions. May the supreme Divinity keep you safe for us for a long life. Papas sends many greetings to Your Worthiness.

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Dioscorus, a Greek student in Africa. “Master of the records” (magister memoriae) was a high imperial secretarial office.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 117.1 (CSEL 34.2:663–665; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/111-1/#p-117-1).

## Letter 118.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:665–666
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Dioscorus that he has no time for his many questions and would rather cure his curiosity than feed it.

### Latin text

Tu me innumerabilium quaestionum turba repente circumuallandum uel potius obruendum putasti, etiam si uacantem otiosumque credidisti. quando enim ego in quolibet otio tot rerum nodos tam festinanti et, ut scribis, iam paene proficiscenti possem dissoluere? numero enim rerum ipsarum impedirer, etiam si nodi faciles ad soluendum forent; tanta sunt autem perplexitate inuoluti et tenacitate constricti, ut, etiam si pauci essent, otiosissimum me occupantes magna mora temporis fatigarent intentionem atque attererent ungues meos. ego te autem uellem abripere de medio deliciosarum inquisitionum tuarum et constipare inter curas meas, ut uel disceres non esse inaniter curiosus uel curiositatem tuam cibandam atque nutriendam inponere non auderes eis, quorum inter curas uel maxima cura est reprimere ac refrenare curiosos. quanto enim melius quantoque fructuosius, si in dandis ad te ullis litteris tempus atque opera inpenditur, ad hoc potius inpenditur, ut resecentur uanae atque fallaces cupiditates tuae, quae tanto magis cauendae sunt, quanto facilius decipiunt nescio qua umbra honestatis et liberalium studiorum nomine uelatae atque palliatae, quam ut nostro ministerio atque, ut ita dixerim, satellitio in dominatum, quo tam bonam tuam mentem premant, uehementius excitentur!

### English translation (Claude)

You thought that I should suddenly be surrounded, or rather overwhelmed, by a crowd of innumerable questions, even if you believed me to be free and at leisure. For when, with any amount of leisure, could I untie so many knotty matters for one in such haste and, as you write, already almost setting out? I would be hindered by the very number of the matters even if the knots were easy to untie; but they are wrapped up in such intricacy and bound so tightly that, even if they were few, they would occupy me at my most leisured, weary my attention by the great expenditure of time, and wear down my fingernails. But I would like to snatch you away from the midst of your delightful inquiries and pack you in among my cares, so that you might either learn not to be idly curious, or not dare to impose the feeding and nourishing of your curiosity on those among whose cares even the greatest is to repress and rein in the curious. For if time and effort are spent in writing you any letter, how much better and more fruitful it is that they be spent on cutting back your vain and deceitful desires, which are the more to be guarded against the more easily they deceive, veiled and cloaked as they are with some shadow of honor and the name of liberal studies, than that by our ministry and, so to speak, our escort they should be roused more vehemently to the domination by which they oppress your so good mind!

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.1 (CSEL 34.2:665–666; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-1).

## Letter 118.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:666–667
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that it would be unbecoming for a busy bishop to expound Cicero to a single student, sailing or not.

### Latin text

Ecce enim tot dialogi lecti si ad uidendum finem et capessendum omnium actionum tuarum nihil te adiuuerunt, quid prosunt? dic mihi. nam ubi finem constitueris totius huius flagrantissimi studii tui et tibi infructuosi et nobis molesti, epistula tua satis indicas. cum enim de soluendis quaestionibus, quas misisti, apud me per litteras satageres, ita scripsisti: Possem te inquis, plus et per multos caros tuos exorare, sed noui animum tuum, qui non rogari desiderat sed omnibus praestare, si tantum absit, quod dedecet, quod in hac re penitus nihil est dedecoris. tamen quodcumque est, peto praestes nauigaturo in his uerbis epistulae tuae recte quidem de me existimas, quod omnibus praestare desiderem, si absit, quod dedecet; sed in hac re nihil esse dedecoris, non mihi uidetur. non enim dedecora facies rerum adtingit sensum meum, cum cogito episcopum ecclesiasticis curis circumstrepentibus districtum atque distentum repente quasi obsurdescentem cohibere se ab his omnibus et dialogorum Tullianorum quaestiunculas uni scholastico exponere? quod quantum dedeceat, quamquam tuorum studiorum raptus ardore prorsus nolis adtendere, tu etiam sentis tamen. quid enim aliud indicat, quod, cum dixisses in hac re penitus nihil esse dedecoris, statim adiunxisti: Tamen quodcumque est, peto praestes nauigaturo. hoc enim sonat uideri tibi quidem nihil in hac re esse dedecoris, tamen, quodcumque est dedecoris, petere te, ut praestem nauigaturo. sed quid est, quaeso te, quod addidisti nauigaturo? an ego, nisi nauigaturus esses, praestare tibi aliquid dedecoris non deberem? nimirum putas, quod aqua marina dedecus abluatur. quod si ita esset, meum certe, qui nauigaturus non sum, inexpiatum remaneret.

### English translation (Claude)

For look: if so many dialogues you have read have not helped you at all to see and grasp the end of all your actions, what use are they? Tell me. For where you have set the end of this whole most ardent study of yours, fruitless to you and burdensome to us, your letter shows clearly enough. For when you were busying yourself to get me to solve by letter the questions you sent, you wrote thus: “I could entreat you more,” you say, “and through many who are dear to you, but I know your mind, which does not wish to be asked but to grant to all, provided only that nothing unbecoming is involved; and in this matter there is absolutely nothing unbecoming. However that may be, I ask you to grant it to me as I am about to sail.” In these words of your letter you judge rightly of me that I desire to grant to all, if nothing unbecoming is involved; but that there is nothing unbecoming in this matter does not seem so to me. For does not the unbecoming look of the thing strike my mind when I think of a bishop, distracted and stretched by church cares that clamor around him, suddenly growing deaf, as it were, holding himself back from all these and expounding little questions on Cicero's dialogues to a single student? How unbecoming this is, although carried away by the ardor of your studies you are quite unwilling to attend to it, you nevertheless feel too. For what else does it show that, having said that in this matter there is absolutely nothing unbecoming, you at once added, “However that may be, I ask you to grant it to me as I am about to sail”? For this sounds as if it seemed to you that there is nothing unbecoming in this matter, yet, whatever unbecomingness there is, you ask me to grant it to you as one about to sail. But what is it, I ask you, that you added, “as one about to sail”? Ought I not to grant you something unbecoming unless you were about to sail? No doubt you think that disgrace is washed off by sea water. If that were so, mine at least would remain unexpiated, since I am not about to sail.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.2 (CSEL 34.2:666–667; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-2).

## Letter 118.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:667–668
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes Dioscorus for studying only to escape the reproach of ignorance, quoting Persius against him.

### Latin text

Scribis etiam nosse me, quam tibi molestissimum sit oneri esse cuipiam, et adtestaris solum deum nosse, quod nimia necessitate inpulsus hoc feceris. hic sane, cum epistulam tuam legerem, satis aduerti animum cognoscere necessitatem tuam, cum ecce mihi adfers et dicis: Mores hominum non ignoratis, qui procliues sunt ad uituperandum, et quam, si interrogatus quis non responderit, indoctus et hebes putabitur. hoc loco uero exarsi ad rescribendum tibi; hoc enim languore animi tui penetrasti mihi pectus et inrupisti in curas meas, ut dissimulare non possem, quantum me deus adiuuaret, mederi tibi, non ut de tuis quaestionibus enodandis explicandisque cogitarem, sed ut felicitatem tuam pendentem ex linguis hominum atque nutantem a tam infelici retinaculo abrumperem et cuidam sedi omnino inconcussae stabilique religarem. tune, o Dioscore, nec Persium tuum respicis insultantem tibi contorto uersiculo sed plane puerile caput, si sensus adsit, idoneo colapho contundentem atque cohercentem: Scire tuum nihil est, nisi te scire hoc sciat alter? tot, ut superius dixi, legisti dialogos, tot philosophorum altercationibus cor inseruisti! dic mihi, quaeso, quis eorum finem actionum suarum constituerit in fama uulgi aut in lingua hominum uel bonorum atque sapientium. tu autem et, quod magis pudendum est, iam nauigaturus satis praeclare te in Africa profecisse testaris, cum aliam ob causam te oneri non esse adseris negotiosissimis et in alia longe distantia intentis episcopis, ut tibi exponant Ciceronem, nisi quia times homines procliues ad uituperandum, ne interrogatus ab eis, si non responderis, indoctus et hebes puteris! o rem dignam uigiliis et lucubrationibus episcoporum!

### English translation (Claude)

You write also that I know how very irksome it is to you to be a burden to anyone, and you call God alone to witness that you have done this driven by excessive necessity. Here indeed, as I was reading your letter, I turned my mind attentively to learn what your necessity was, when lo, you bring it to me and say: “You are not ignorant of men's ways, how prone they are to find fault, and how, if someone who is asked does not answer, he will be thought unlearned and dull.” At this point I truly blazed up to write back to you; for by this sickness of your mind you pierced my heart and broke in upon my cares, so that I could not leave you untreated, as far as God would help me; not so as to think about untying and unraveling your questions, but to break off your happiness, which hangs on the tongues of men and sways from so unhappy a mooring, and tie it to a seat wholly unshaken and stable. Do you not consider, Dioscorus, even your Persius, who mocks you with a twisted little verse, or rather pounds and checks your plainly childish head, if there is any sense in it, with a fitting blow: “Is your knowing nothing, unless another knows that you know?” You have read, as I said above, so many dialogues; you have inserted your heart into so many disputes of philosophers! Tell me, I beg you, which of them set the end of his actions in the fame of the crowd or in the tongue of men, even of good and wise men? But you, and what is more shameful, already about to sail, testify that you have made quite splendid progress in Africa, since you assert that you are a burden to very busy bishops, intent on matters far removed, getting them to expound Cicero to you, for no other reason than that you fear men prone to find fault, lest, questioned by them, if you do not answer, you be thought unlearned and dull! O matter worthy of the vigils and night studies of bishops!

### Extrabiblical texts

- Persius, 1.27 (Persius, Satires): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Persius, Satires 1.27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.3 (CSEL 34.2:667–668; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-3).

## Letter 118.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:668–669
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points out that Dioscorus fears only to be thought ignorant, and warns that one who fears such opinions is dry wood.

### Latin text

Non mihi uideris aliunde dies noctesque cogitare, nisi ut in studiis tuis atque doctrina lauderis ab hominibus. quod etsi semper ad certa et recta tendentibus periculosum esse iudicaui, nunc tamen in te maxime experior. non enim aliunde quam ex eadem pernicie non uidisti, qua tandem re possemus moueri, ut tibi, quod petebas, daremus. quam enim peruerse tu ipse non ob aliud ad ea discenda, quae interrogas, raperis, nisi ut lauderis aut non uitupereris ab hominibus, tam peruerse etiam nos putas in tua petitione talibus causis allegatis moueri. et utinam possemus efficere, ut tu quoque tam inani atque fallaci humanae laudis bono minime mouereris, cum tibi nos indicaremus non ad praestandum tibi, quod petis, quoniam haec de te scribis, sed ad te corrigendum moueri! mores hominum, inquis, procliues sunt ad uituperandum. quid deinde? si interrogatus quis non responderit, inquis, indoctus et hebes putabitur. ecce ego te interrogo non de Ciceronis libris aliquid, cuius sensum fortasse legentes indagare non possunt, sed de ipsa epistula tua et de sententia uerborum tuorum; quaero enim, cur non dixeris: Qui non responderit, indoctus et hebes manifestabitur, sed potius dixeris: Indoctus et hebes putabitur, nisi quia satis etiam ipse intellegis eum, qui talia non responderit, non esse indoctum et hebetem sed putari. at ego te admoneo eum, qui talium putatorum linguis tamquam falcibus concidi timet, lignum esse aridum et ideo non putari tantum indoctum atque hebetem sed uere esse atque conuinci.

### English translation (Claude)

You seem to me to think of nothing else day and night than of being praised by men for your studies and learning. Although I have always judged this dangerous for those who strive toward what is certain and right, I now experience it most of all in you. For it was from no other source than that same ruinous habit that you failed to see by what means we could actually be moved to give you what you asked. For just as perversely as you yourself are carried away to learn the things you ask about for no other reason than to be praised, or not to be blamed, by men, so perversely too you think that we are moved in your petition by the reasons you allege. And would that we could bring it about that you too were not in the least moved by so empty and deceitful a good as human praise, now that we show you that we are moved, not to grant what you ask, since you write these things about yourself, but to correct you! Men's ways, you say, are prone to find fault. What then? If someone who is asked does not answer, you say, he will be thought unlearned and dull. See, I question you, not about something in Cicero's books, whose sense perhaps their readers cannot track down, but about your own letter and the meaning of your words. For I ask why you did not say, “He who does not answer will be shown to be unlearned and dull,” but said rather, “He will be thought unlearned and dull,” unless because you yourself understand well enough that one who does not answer such things is not unlearned and dull, but is thought so. But I warn you that he who fears to be cut down by the tongues of such pruners as by pruning hooks is dry wood, and therefore is not merely “pruned,” that is, thought, unlearned and dull, but truly is so and is shown to be so.

### Translation notes

- Augustine puns on putare, “to think” and “to prune”: the “thinkers” (putatores) are also pruners, and dry wood is not pruned.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.4 (CSEL 34.2:668–669; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-4).

## Letter 118.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:669–670
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that studying merely to avoid being thought ignorant is an empty end that blinds the mind to the truth.

### Latin text

Fortasse dixeris: Sed cum hebes animo non sim et praecipue non esse studeam, nolo hebes animo uel putari. recte; sed quo fine nolis, id quaero. quod enim in illis quaestionibus aperiendis tibi et explicandis nec nobis oneri esse dubitasti, hanc causam et hunc finem esse dixisti et tam necessarium, ut eam nimiam necessitatem appellares, ne scilicet de his interrogatus neque respondens ab hominibus ad uituperandum procliuibus indoctus et hebes puteris. ego autem quaero, hocine totum sit, cur a nobis ista desideres, an etiam indoctus et hebes putari propter aliud aliquid nolis. si hoc totum est, cernis, ut arbitror, hunc esse finem tam uehementis intentionis tuae, qua nobis quoque oneri es, ut fateris. quid autem a Dioscoro potest nobis esse oneri, nisi quod ipsum Dioscorum etiam nescientem onerat? quod non sentiet, nisi cum surgere uoluerit; atque utinam non sic alligentur haec onera, ut frustra etiam humeros conetur excutere! quod non ideo dico, quia istae discuntur quaestiones, sed quia tali fine discuntur. hunc enim finem certe iam sentis esse nugatorium, inanem, uentosum; habet et tumorem, sub quo etiam tabes gignitur, et pupulae mentis ad non uidendam opulentiam ueritatis offunditur. crede, sic est, mi Dioscore, ita te fruar in ipsa uoluntate et in ipsa. cuius umbra auerteris, dignitate ueritatis. unde enim tibi nisi uel hoc modo de hac re fidem faciam, non inuenio. non enim uides eam aut ullo modo, quam diu linguis humanis ruinosa gaudia construis, potes eam uidere.

### English translation (Claude)

Perhaps you will say: “But since I am not dull of mind, and strive especially not to be, I do not want even to be thought dull of mind.” Rightly; but for what end you do not want it, that is what I ask. For you said that the reason and the end for which you did not hesitate to be a burden to us in opening and explaining those questions to you was so necessary that you called it an excessive necessity: namely, lest, when questioned about them and not answering, you be thought unlearned and dull by men prone to find fault. But I ask whether this is the whole reason why you want these things from us, or whether you do not want to be thought unlearned and dull for some other reason as well. If this is the whole of it, you see, I think, that this is the end of your so vehement endeavor, by which you are a burden to us too, as you confess. But what burden can come to us from Dioscorus, except what burdens Dioscorus himself, even without his knowing it? He will not feel it until he wishes to rise; and would that these burdens may not be so tightly bound on that he tries in vain even to shake them off his shoulders! I do not say this because these questions are studied, but because they are studied for such an end. For you surely already feel that this end is trifling, empty, windy; it also has a swelling, under which a wasting disease is bred, and it spreads over the pupil of the mind so that it does not see the riches of truth. Believe me, it is so, my Dioscorus; so may I enjoy you in that very will and in that very dignity of truth from whose shadow you are turned away. For I find no other way than this to make you believe me on this matter. For you do not see the truth, nor can you see it in any way, as long as you build ruinous joys on human tongues.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.5 (CSEL 34.2:669–670; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-5).

## Letter 118.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:670–671
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that seeking fame as a means to wealth, marriage, or honors only leads from one unstable good to another, whereas the truth is near and free.

### Latin text

Si autem non ibi finis est harum actionum atque intentionis tuae, sed propter aliud aliquid indoctus et hebes non uis putari, quaero, quid illud sit. si propterea, ne angustior tibi aditus ad adquirendas temporales diuitias, uxorem impetrandam, honores capessendos et cetera huius modi praecipiti fluxu transcurrentia atque in se lapsos in imum rapientia, neque ad hunc finem tibi seruire nos decet, immo decet etiam hinc te amouere. non enim sic te prohibemus in incerto famae finem ponere, ut tamquam de Mincio in Eridanum emigres, quo te ipse fortasse Mincius etiam non emigrantem impingeret. cum enim non satiauerit auidum spiritum uanitas laudis humanae, quia nihil ad cibandum adfert nisi inane et inflatum, cogitur eam ipsa auiditas referre in aliud quasi uberius atque fructuosius; quod nihilo minus si temporali lapsu praeterfluit, ita est, quasi fluuius ducat in fluuium, ut non sit finis miseriae, quam diu finis officiorum nostrorum in re instabili conlocatur. in aliquo igitur firmo atque incommutabili bono te figere uolumus constantissimae intentionis domum et securissimam requiem omnis bonae atque honestae actionis tuae. an forte istam ipsam terrenam felicitatem, quam commemoraui, si prosperi rumoris aura aut etiam flatibus uela pandendo ad eam potueris peruenire, hanc etiam cogitas referre in aliud uerum et certum et plenum bonum? at mihi non uidetur atque omnino ipsa ueritas negat uel tantis ad se anfractibus, quae tam proxima est, uel tantis sumptibus, quae tam gratuita est, perueniri.

### English translation (Claude)

But if the end of these actions and of your endeavor is not there, but you do not want to be thought unlearned and dull for some other reason, I ask what that is. If it is so that your access may not be narrower to acquiring temporal riches, obtaining a wife, seizing honors, and other things of this kind that run past in a headlong flow and drag those who slip into them down to the depths, neither is it fitting that we serve you for this end; indeed, it is fitting rather to remove you from it. For we do not forbid you to set your end in the uncertainty of fame in order that you may emigrate, as it were, from the Mincius into the Eridanus, into which the Mincius itself might perhaps thrust you even if you did not emigrate. For when the vanity of human praise has not satisfied the greedy spirit, since it brings nothing for food but what is empty and puffed up, that very greed is compelled to turn it toward something else, as it were richer and more fruitful; and if this too flows past in temporal passing, it is as if one river led into another, so that there is no end of misery as long as the end of our duties is placed in an unstable thing. We wish, therefore, to fix in some firm and unchangeable good the home of your most constant endeavor and the most secure rest of all your good and honorable action. Or perhaps that very earthly happiness which I mentioned, if you could reach it by spreading your sails to the breeze, or even the gusts, of favorable rumor, you think of turning this too toward another good, true, certain, and full? But it does not seem so to me, and truth itself wholly denies that it is reached by such winding detours, when it is so near, or at such cost, when it is so free.

### Translation notes

- The Mincius flows into the Po (Eridanus): passing from fame to worldly gain is moving from one river to a greater one.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.6 (CSEL 34.2:670–671; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-6).

## Letter 118.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:671–672
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if Dioscorus wanted learning in order to win a hearing for the truth, he should rather learn the rules of truth themselves.

### Latin text

An ipsa humana laude tamquam instrumento utendum existimas, ut aditum per hanc praepares ad animos hominum persuadendi uera atque salubria, et caues, ne te, cum indoctum atque hebetem putauerint, indignum arbitrentur, cui aurem uel intentissimam uel patientissimam praebeant, siue ad recte facta quemquam exhorteris siue malitiam atque nequitiam peccantis obiurges? hunc tu finem iustitiae ac beneficentiae si in illis interrogandis quaestionibus cogitasti, nos de te male meruimus, quibus in epistula tua non id potius, quo moueremur, posuisti, ut aut libenter daremus, quod petebas, aut ideo non daremus, quia causa quaelibet alia fortasse prohiberet, non tamen quia tuae uanae cupiditati non solum seruire uerum etiam non resistere puderet. quanto enim melius atque salubrius, quaeso te, ipsas ueritatis regulas multo certius et breuius per se ipsas accipis, quibus falsa omnia possis ipse refellere, ne, quod falsum et pudendum est, si multorum annosas et decrepitas falsitates studio iactantiore quam prudentiore didiceris, doctum atque intellegentem te esse arbitreris! quod iam non existimo uideri tibi; non enim frustra tam diu tam uera Dioscoro diximus, ex quo in hac epistula gradimur.

### English translation (Claude)

Or do you think that human praise itself should be used as an instrument, so that through it you may prepare access to men's minds for persuading them of what is true and wholesome, and are you taking care lest, if they think you unlearned and dull, they judge you unworthy to receive from them an ear either most attentive or most patient, whether you are exhorting someone to right action or rebuking the malice and wickedness of a sinner? If you had this end of justice and beneficence in mind in asking those questions, it was unfair to us that in your letter you did not rather set this before us to move us, so that we might either gladly give what you asked or else decline because some other cause perhaps prevented us, but not because we were ashamed not only to serve your vain desire but even not to resist it. For how much better and more wholesome it is, I ask you, to receive the very rules of truth far more surely and briefly in themselves, by which you could refute everything false yourself, rather than to think yourself learned and intelligent, which is false and shameful, if you have learned the aged and decrepit falsehoods of many people with more ostentatious than prudent zeal! I do not think this now seems right to you; for not in vain have we said such true things to Dioscorus for so long, since the point from which we set out in this letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.7 (CSEL 34.2:671–672; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-7).

## Letter 118.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:672
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks whether the false opinion of fault-finders should move Dioscorus to burden bishops with his questions.

### Latin text

Quapropter iam illud uideamus, cum te istarum rerum ignorantia nequaquam indoctum atque hebetem iudices sed ipsius potius ueritatis, ut, quisquis de his rebus scripsit uel scripserit, aut ea sint, quae iam certus tenes, aut, si falsa sunt, securus ignores neque de diuersitate cognoscenda sententiarum alienarum, quasi ne indoctus et hebes remaneas, inani sollicitudine macereris, — cum ergo haec ita sint, etiam illud, si placet, uideamus, utrum aliorum falsa existimatio, qui sunt, ut scribis, ad uituperandum procliues, ita ut, si te ista ignorare persenserint, indoctum atque hebetem falso quidem sed tamen putent, sic te mouere debeat ut etiam ab episcopis tibi haec exponi non incongruenter petas, quando quidem eo fine iam te ista cupere credimus, quo illis consulas ad persuadendam ueritatem uitamque eorum corrigendam, qui te, si in illis Ciceronis libris indoctum hebetemque putauerint, indignum habebunt, a quo aliquid utilis salubrisque scientiae sibi accipiendum esse arbitrentur.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore let us now consider this. Since you judge that a man is by no means unlearned and dull through ignorance of these things, but rather through ignorance of the truth itself, so that, whoever has written or will write about these matters, either the things are what you already hold for certain, or, if they are false, you are untroubled not to know them, and you need not waste away with empty anxiety about learning the diversity of other men's opinions, as though to avoid remaining unlearned and dull; since this is so, let us also consider, if you please, whether the false opinion of others, who are, as you write, prone to find fault, so that if they perceived you were ignorant of these things they would think you unlearned and dull, falsely indeed but still think it, ought to move you so much that you may not unfittingly ask even bishops to expound these things to you. For we now believe that you desire these things for this end, that you may help those people by persuading them of the truth and correcting their lives, who, if they thought you unlearned and dull about those books of Cicero, would consider you unworthy to be someone from whom they should receive any useful and wholesome knowledge.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.8 (CSEL 34.2:672; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-8).

## Letter 118.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:672–674
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine observes that no one in Rome, Carthage, or the Greek East cares about such questions, and that he himself, once a teacher of rhetoric, no longer deals in boyish things.

### Latin text

Quod non ita est — mihi crede —, primum quia esse aliquos in illis terris, ubi inperitus minimeque acutus uideri times, qui te de istis quaestionibus quicquam interrogent, omnino non uideo, quando quidem hic, quo ad ea discenda uenisti, et Romae expertus es, quam neglegenter habeantur et ob hoc neque doceantur neque discantur; et in Africa usque adeo de his interrogatorem pateris neminem, ut nec te ipsum quis patiatur inuenias eaque inopia episcopis exponenda ea mittere cogaris, quasi uero isti episcopi, etiam si adulescentes eodem, quo tu raperis, animi ardore uel potius errore quasi aliquid magnum haec discere curarunt, usque ad canos episcopales et usque ad cathedras ecclesiasticas ea sibi in memoria durare paterentur aut, si ipsi uellent, non illa etiam de inuitorum cordibus curae maiores grauioresque secluderent aut, si aliqua ex eis in animis eorum nimia consuetudine remanerent, non etiam ipsa obliuione sepelire mallent recordata quam ineptia respondere quaesita, cum in ipsa etiam scholari leuitate et rhetoricis cathedris ita obmutuisse atque obtorpuisse uideantur, ut a Carthagine Hipponem, quo exponi possint, mittenda existimentur, ubi tam insolita atque omnino peregrina sunt, ut, si uellem respondendi cura inspicere aliquid uolens uidere, quo modo ad sententiam, quae mihi exponenda esset, desuper ueniatur aut ab ea deinceps quae contexeretur oratio, codicem prorsus inuenire non possem. illi autem Carthaginienses rhetores si huic tuo studio defuerunt, non modo a me non reprehenduntur, sed etiam adprobantur, si forte iam recolunt non Romanorum fororum sed Graecorum gymnasiorum ista solere esse certamina. tu uero cum et in gymnasia cogitationem iniecisti et ea quoque ipsa inuenisti talibus rebus nuda atque frigida, ubi has curas tuas deponeres, Christianorum tibi basilica Hipponiensis occurrit, quia in ea nunc sedet episcopus, qui aliquando ista pueris uendidit. sed nec te uolo esse adhuc puerum et me iam esse puerilium rerum sicut non uenditorem ita nec largitorem decet. quae cum ita sint, id est cum duae tantae urbes Latinarum litterarum artifices, Roma atque Carthago, nec taedio tibi sint, ut a te ista perquirant, nec taedia tua curent, ut te ista perquirentem exaudiant, miror tantum, quantum dici non potest, uereri te, tam boni ingenii iuuenem, ne in Graecis atque orientalibus urbibus quemquam de his rebus molestum interrogatorem feras. facilius quippe corniculas in Africa audieris quam in illis partibus hoc genus uocis.

### English translation (Claude)

That is not so, believe me. First, because I do not see at all that there are any people in those lands where you fear to seem unskilled and not at all sharp who would question you about these questions, since you have experienced both here, where you came to learn them, and at Rome how negligently they are regarded, and that for this reason they are neither taught nor learned; and in Africa you suffer from such a lack of anyone to question you about them that you find no one to put up with you yourself, and by that dearth you are compelled to send them to bishops to be expounded; as if these bishops, even if as young men they took care, with the same ardor, or rather error, of mind by which you are carried away, to learn these things as something great, would suffer them to last in their memory down to their episcopal grey hairs and their church chairs; or, if they themselves wished it, as if greater and graver cares would not shut these things out of their hearts even against their will; or, if some of them remained in their minds through excessive habit, as if they would not prefer to bury them in oblivion once remembered rather than answer questions about them with ineptitude. Indeed, even in the frivolity of the schools and in the chairs of rhetoric they seem to have fallen so silent and torpid that they are thought to need sending from Carthage to Hippo to be expounded, where they are so unusual and wholly foreign that, if in my care to answer I wanted to look up something, to see how the passage to be expounded is reached from what precedes, or what discourse is connected with it afterward, I could not find a copy at all. But those rhetoricians of Carthage, if they failed this zeal of yours, are not only not blamed by me but are even approved, if perhaps they now recall that these used to be the contests not of the Roman forums but of the Greek gymnasia. But you, when you had cast your thoughts toward the gymnasia too and found them also bare and cold in such things, thought of the Christian basilica of Hippo as the place to lay down these cares of yours, because a bishop now sits in it who once sold these things to boys. But I do not want you still to be a boy; and it is not fitting for me now, as I am no longer a seller of boyish things, to be a giver of them either. Since this is so, that is, since two such great cities, masters of Latin letters, Rome and Carthage, neither are troubled to question you about these things nor care about your troubles so as to listen to you when you inquire about them, I wonder beyond words that you, a young man of such good intellect, fear that in Greek and Eastern cities you may have to bear some troublesome questioner about these matters. You would sooner hear crows in Africa than this kind of talk in those parts.

### Translation notes

- Augustine had taught rhetoric before his conversion.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.9 (CSEL 34.2:672–674; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-9).

## Letter 118.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:674–675
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Dioscorus that in Greece he would rather be blamed for learning Greek philosophy from Latin dialogues instead of the Greek originals.

### Latin text

Deinde si fallor et quisquam ibi forte huius modi quaestionum tanto utique odiosior quanto in illis locis ineptior percontator extiterit, nonne magis caues, ne multo facilius existant, qui te Graeci homines in Graecia constitutum et Graeca inbutum primitus lingua de ipsis philosophorum libris aliqua interrogent, quae Cicero in suis litteris non posuit? quod si acciderit, quid responsurus es? potius te ista in Latinorum auctorum libris quam in Graecorum nosse uoluisse? qua responsione primo Graeciae facies iniuriam et nosti, quam illi homines hoc non ferant; deinde iam exulcerati et irati quam cito te, quod nimis non uis, et hebetem iudicabunt, qui Graecorum philosophorum dogmata uel potius dogmatum particulas quasdam discerptas atque dispersas in Latinis dialogis quam in ipsorum auctorum libris Graecis tota atque contexta discere maluisti, et indoctum, qui cum tam multa in tua lingua nescias, earum rerum frusta in aliena colligere ambisti! an forte illud respondebis, non te Graecos de his rebus libros contempsisse sed prius Latinos curasse cognoscere, nunc autem uelle te in Latinis doctum Graeca iam quaerere? si hoc non pudet, hominem Graecum Latina puerum didicisse, nunc uelle discere Graeca barbatum, pudebitne tandem in ipsis Latinis ignorare aliqua, quae quam multi Latini docti tecum nesciant, uel hoc ipso sentis, quod te nobis magna necessitate dicis onerosum in tanta doctorum multitudine apud Carthaginem constitutus?

### English translation (Claude)

Then, if I am wrong and someone there perhaps should turn up who asks questions of this kind (the more odious, surely, the more out of place in those regions), should you not rather beware that there will much more easily turn up Greeks who will question you, now settled in Greece and brought up first in the Greek tongue, about things in the actual books of the philosophers which Cicero did not put in his writings? If that happens, what will you answer? That you preferred to know these things from the books of Latin authors rather than of Greek? By that answer you will first insult Greece, and you know how those men do not bear that; then, already sore and angry, how quickly they will judge you, what you so much do not want, both dull, since you preferred to learn the doctrines of the Greek philosophers, or rather certain torn and scattered fragments of doctrines, from Latin dialogues rather than whole and connected in the Greek books of the authors themselves, and unlearned, since, not knowing so many things in your own language, you sought to collect scraps of these matters in a foreign one! Or perhaps you will answer that you did not despise the Greek books on these matters but took care to know the Latin first, and now, learned in Latin, want to seek the Greek? If you are not ashamed of this, that a Greek learned Latin as a boy and now wants to learn Greek as a bearded man, will you then be ashamed to be ignorant of some things in Latin itself, of which you may perceive how many learned Latins are as ignorant as you from this very fact, that you say you are burdening us out of great necessity, though you are living at Carthage among so great a multitude of learned men?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.10 (CSEL 34.2:674–675; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-10).

## Letter 118.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:675–676
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Dioscorus that Christian teaching needs no knowledge of Cicero to win hearers; his conduct should make them attentive.

### Latin text

Postremo fac te de omnibus, quae a nobis quaeris, interrogatum respondere potuisse. ecce iam doctissimus atque acutissimus diceris, ecce iam te laudibus in caelum Graeculus flatus adtollit; tu tantum memento grauitatis tuae et illam mereri laudem quo fine uolueris, ut scilicet eos leuiter leuia ista miratos et beniuolentissime atque auidissime iam in tua ora suspensos grauissimum aliquid et saluberrimum doceas. id ipsum, quicquid est grauissimum et saluberrimum, utrum teneas et recte tradere noueris, uellem cognoscere. ridiculum est enim, cum propterea superflua multa didiceris, ut tibi aures hominum ad necessaria praeparentur, ipsa necessaria non tenere, quibus excipiendis eas per superflua praeparaueris, et, dum occuparis, ut discas, unde facias intentos, nolle discere, quod infundatur intentis. sed si hoc te scire iam dicis idque ipsum Christianam doctrinam esse respondes, quam te omnibus praeponere nouimus et in ea sola esse praesumere spem salutis aeternae, non opus est ei cognitione dialogorum Ciceronis et collectione emendicatarum discordantium sententiarum alienarum procurari auditores. moribus tuis intenti fiant, qui abs te aliquid tale accepturi sunt. nolo prius aliquid doceas, quod dediscendum est, ut uera doceas.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, suppose that, when questioned about everything you ask us, you have been able to answer. See, now you are called most learned and most acute; see, now a little Greek puff of breath raises you to the skies with praise. Only remember your seriousness, and the end for which you wanted to earn that praise: namely, that you may teach something most serious and wholesome to those who lightly admired these light things and now hang most benevolently and eagerly on your lips. Whether you hold that very thing, whatever is most serious and wholesome, and know how to hand it on rightly, I should like to know. For it is ridiculous, when you have learned many superfluous things so that men's ears may be prepared for you to hear necessary things, not to hold the necessary things themselves, for receiving which you prepared their ears by the superfluous; and, while you are busy learning how to make them attentive, to be unwilling to learn what is to be poured into them once they are attentive. But if you say that you already know this, and answer that this is the Christian teaching, which we know you set above everything and in which alone you hold that the hope of eternal salvation lies, it has no need of a knowledge of Cicero's dialogues and a collection of other men's begged and discordant opinions to procure hearers. Let those who are to receive anything of the kind from you be made attentive by your conduct. I do not want you first to teach something that must be unlearned, in order to teach the truth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.11 (CSEL 34.2:675–676; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-11).

## Letter 118.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:676–677
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the defender of the faith should study the living heresies of his day rather than long-dead philosophers.

### Latin text

Nam si alienarum sententiarum dissidentium et repugnantium cognitio aliquid adiuuat insinuatorem Christianae ueritatis, ut nouerit, quo modo aduersantes destruat falsitates ad hoc dum taxat, ne quis contra disserens nonnisi in refellendis tuis figat oculum, sua uero sedulo occultet, nam cognitio ueritatis omnia falsa, si modo proferantur, etiam quae prius inaudita erant, et diiudicare et subuertere idonea est, — sed, ut non solum aperta feriantur, sed etiam abscondita eruantur, si alienos opus est cognoscere errores, erige oculos auresque, oro te, et uide atque ausculta, utrum aliquis aduersus nos de Anaximene et de Anaxagora proferat aliquid, quando iam ne ipsorum quidem multo recentiorum multumque loquacium Stoicorum aut Epicureorum cineres caleant, unde aliqua contra fidem Christianam scintilla excitetur. sed circuli atque conuenticula partim fugacia partim etiam audaciter prompta uel Donatistarum uel Maximianensium uel Manichaeorum uel etiam, ad quorum greges turbamque uenturus es, Arrianorum, Eunomianorum, Macedonianorum, Cataphrygarum ceterarumque pestium innumerabiliter perstrepant. quorum omnium errores si cognoscere piget, quid nobis est propter defensionem Christianae religionis quaerere, quid senserit Anaximenes, et olim sopitas lites inani curiositate recoquere, cum quorundam etiam haereticorum, qui nomine Christiano gloriari noluerunt, ut Marcionistarum et Sabellianorum multorumque praeterea iam dissensiones quaestionesque sileantur? tamen si opus est, ut dixi, ueritati aduersantes praenoscere aliquas et pertractatas habere sententias, de haereticis potius, qui se Christianos uocant, quam de Anaxagora et Democrito nobis cogitandum fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

For if knowledge of other men's dissenting and conflicting opinions helps somewhat the one who introduces Christian truth, so that he knows how to destroy the falsehoods opposed to it, this is only so that no one arguing against him may fix his eye solely on refuting your views while carefully hiding his own; for knowledge of the truth is able to judge and overturn all falsehoods, if only they are brought forward, even those not heard of before. But so that not only open errors may be struck down but hidden ones dug out too, if one needs to know other men's errors, lift up your eyes and ears, I beg you, and see and listen whether anyone brings anything against us from Anaximenes and Anaxagoras, when not even the ashes of the much more recent and very talkative Stoics or Epicureans are still warm enough for any spark to be kindled from them against the Christian faith. But the circles and small gatherings, partly furtive, partly boldly open, of the Donatists, or Maximianists, or Manichaeans, or also, to whose flocks and crowds you are now going, of the Arians, Eunomians, Macedonians, Cataphrygians, and the other plagues without number, make a din. If it is irksome to learn the errors of all these, what need have we, for the defense of the Christian religion, to inquire what Anaximenes thought, and with empty curiosity to recook quarrels long put to sleep, when even the dissensions and questions of certain heretics who chose to glory in the Christian name, such as the Marcionites and Sabellians and many others besides, have now fallen silent? Yet if, as I said, it is necessary to know in advance and to have examined some opinions opposed to the truth, we ought to have thought about the heretics who call themselves Christians rather than about Anaxagoras and Democritus.

### Translation notes

- The text prints “noluerunt” (“chose not to glory”); the sense requires “uoluerunt” (“chose to glory”), which is translated.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.12 (CSEL 34.2:676–677; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-12).

## Letter 118.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:677–678
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows Dioscorus that the knowledge needed is how to be happy: the highest good lies not in the body or the mind but in God.

### Latin text

Ille autem, quisquis abs te quaesierit, quae tu a nobis quaeris, audiat, quod ea doctius et prudentius nescias. si enim Themistocles non curauit, quod est habitus indoctior, cum canere neruis in epulis recusasset, ubi cum se nescire illa dixisset eique dictum esset: Quid igitur nosti? respondit: Rem publicam ex parua magnam facere, dubitandum tibi est dicere te ista nescire, cum ei, qui rogarit, quid noueris, respondere possis nosse te, quo modo etiam sine istis homo esse possit beatus? quod si adhuc non tenes, tam peruerse ista conquiris, quam peruerse, si aliquo corporis periculoso morbo grauareris, deliciosas et tenerrimas uestes potius quam medicamenta medicosque conquireres. non enim ullo modo differenda est ista cognitio aut illa huic a te praesertim iam in hac aetate uel discendi ordine praeferenda est. uide autem, quam facile posses hoc scire, si uelles. qui enim quaerit, qua ad beatam uitam perueniat, nihil aliud profecto quaerit, nisi ubi sit finis boni, hoc est ubi constitutum sit non praua opinione atque temeraria sed certa atque inconcussa ueritate summum hominis bonum. quod a quolibet, ubi constituatur, non inuenitur nisi aut in corpore aut in animo aut in deo aut in duobus aliquibus horum aut certe in omnibus. quod si didiceris neque summum bonum neque aliquam partem summi boni omnino esse in corpore, duo restabunt, animus et deus, quorum uel in uno uel in ambobus sit. si autem adieceris et didiceris hoc idem de animo quod de corpore, quid aliud iam nisi deus occurret, in quo summum hominis bonum constitutum sit, non quo alia bona non sint, sed summum id dicitur, quo cuncta referuntur; eo enim fruendo quisque beatus est, propter quod cetera uult habere, cum illud iam non propter aliud sed propter se ipsum diligatur, et ideo finis ibi dicitur, quia iam, quo excurrat et quo referatur, non inuenitur, ibi requies appetendi, ibi fruendi securitas, ibi tranquillissimum gaudium optimae uoluntatis.

### English translation (Claude)

But whoever asks you the things you ask us, let him hear that you are more learned and prudent in not knowing them. For if Themistocles did not care that he was considered rather unlearned when he refused to play the lyre at a banquet, and, when he had said that he did not know how and was asked, “What then do you know?”, answered, “How to make a state great from a small one,” should you hesitate to say that you do not know these things, when to one who asks what you know you can answer that you know how a man can be happy even without them? But if you do not yet hold this, you seek these things as perversely as you would, if you were weighed down by some dangerous bodily disease, seek luxurious and very delicate garments rather than medicines and doctors. For in no way is that knowledge to be put off, or this other to be preferred to it by you, especially at your present age, even in the order of learning. But see how easily you could know this if you wished. For he who seeks the way to reach the happy life is surely seeking nothing else than where the end of good is, that is, where the highest good of man is placed, not by depraved and rash opinion but by certain and unshaken truth. And no one finds it placed anywhere but either in the body or in the mind or in God, or in some two of these, or indeed in all. If you have learned that neither the highest good nor any part of the highest good is in the body at all, two will remain, the mind and God, in one or both of which it lies. But if you go on to learn the same about the mind as about the body, what else will present itself but God, in whom the highest good of man is placed? Not that there are no other goods; but that is called the highest to which all are referred. For each person is happy by enjoying that for whose sake he wants to have the rest, since that is loved no longer for the sake of something else but for its own sake; and therefore it is called the end, because nothing further is found to which it runs on or is referred. There is the rest of desire, there the security of enjoyment, there the most tranquil joy of the best will.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 1.4 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The story of Themistocles is told by Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 1.4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.13 (CSEL 34.2:677–678; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-13).

## Letter 118.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:678–679
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the highest good cannot be in the body, since the mind is better than the body, and notes the Epicureans who placed it there.

### Latin text

Da igitur, qui cito uideat non corpus esse animi bonum, sed animum potius esse corporis bonum; recedetur iam ab inquirendo, utrum summum illud bonum uel aliqua pars eius sit in corpore. quod enim stultissime negatur, melior est animus corpore; item stultissime negatur meliorem esse eum, qui dat beatam uitam uel partem aliquam beatae uitae, quam eum, qui accipit; non igitur accipit animus a corpore uel summum bonum uel partem aliquam summi boni. hoc qui non uident caecati dulcedine carnalium uoluptatum, quam ei indigentia sanitatis uenire non intuentur — sanitas autem perfecta corporis illa extrema totius hominis inmortalitas erit; tam potenti enim natura deus fecit animam, ut ex eius plenissima beatitudine, quae in fine temporum sanctis promittitur, redundet etiam in inferiorem naturam, quod est corpus, non beatitudo, quae fruentis et intellegentis est propria, sed plenitudo sanitatis, id est incorruptionis uigor —, quod qui non uident, ut dixi, bellant inquietis altercationibus uarie pro suo quisque captu in corpore constituentes summum hominis bonum et carnalium seditiosorum turbas concitant; inter quos Epicurei apud indoctam multitudinem excellentiore auctoritate uiguerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Grant, then, someone who quickly sees that the body is not the good of the mind, but rather that the mind is the good of the body; then one will give up inquiring whether that highest good, or any part of it, is in the body. For it is most foolish to deny that the mind is better than the body; likewise it is most foolish to deny that he who gives the happy life, or some part of the happy life, is better than he who receives it; therefore the mind does not receive from the body either the highest good or any part of the highest good. Those who do not see this, blinded by the sweetness of carnal pleasures, do not perceive that it comes to them from a lack of health. (The perfect health of the body will be that final immortality of the whole man; for God made the soul of so powerful a nature that from its fullest blessedness, which is promised to the saints at the end of time, there overflows into the lower nature too, which is the body, not blessedness, which belongs properly to the one who enjoys and understands, but fullness of health, that is, the vigor of incorruption.) Those, I say, who do not see this wage war with restless disputes, each according to his capacity placing the highest good of man in the body in different ways, and they stir up mobs of carnal rebels; among them the Epicureans flourished with greater authority among the unlearned multitude.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.14 (CSEL 34.2:678–679; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-14).

## Letter 118.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:679–681
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the mind is not its own highest good, since it is changeable and made wise by the unchangeable Wisdom, which is God; the Stoics erred in placing the good in the mind.

### Latin text

Da item, qui cito uideat animum quoque ipsum non suo bono beatum esse, cum beatus est, alioquin numquam esset miser, et recedetur a quaerendo, utrum in animo sit summum illud atque, ut ita dixerim, beatificum bonum uel aliqua pars eius. nam cum se ipso sibi quasi suo bono animus gaudet, superbus est. cum uero perspicit se esse mutabilem uel hoc uno saltem, quod de stulto sapiens efficitur, sapientiamque esse incommutabilem cernit, simul oportet cernat esse illam supra suam naturam eiusque participatione atque inlustratione se uberius et certius gaudere quam se ipso. ita cessans atque detumescens a iactatione atque inflatione propria inhaerere deo atque ab illo incommutabili refici et reformari nititur, a quo esse iam capit non solum omnem speciem rerum omnium, siue quae sensu corporis siue quae intellegentia mentis adtinguntur, sed etiam ipsam capacitatem formationis ante formationem, cum uel informe aliquid dicitur, quod formari potest. itaque tanto minus se esse stabilem sentit, quanto minus haeret deo, qui summe est, et illum ideo summe esse, quia nulla mutabilitate proficit seu deficit; sibi autem illam commutationem expedire, qua proficit, ut perfecte illi cohaereat, eam uero commutationem, quae in defectu est, esse uitiosam; omnem autem defectum ad interitum uergere, quo utrum aliqua res perueniat, tametsi non apparet, tamen apparere omnibus eo ducere interitum, ut non sit, quod erat. unde colligit non ob aliud res deficere uel posse deficere, nisi quod ex nihilo factae sunt, ut, quod in eis est, quod sunt et manent et pro defectibus etiam suis ad uniuersitatis complexum ordinantur, ad eius bonitatem omnipotentiamque pertineat, qui summe est et conditor, qui potens est etiam ex nihilo non tantum aliquid sed etiam magnum aliquid facere; primum autem peccatum, hoc est primum uoluntarium defectum esse gaudere ad propriam potestatem; ad minus enim gaudet, quam si ad dei potestatem gaudeat, quae utique maior est. hoc non uidentes et potentias intuentes animi humani magnamque pulchritudinem factorum atque dictorum, etiam si in corpore puduit ponere summum bonum, in ipso tamen animo ponentes infra utique posuerunt, quam ubi sincerissima ratione ponendum est. inter hos, qui ita sentiunt apud Graecos philosophos, et numero et disputandi subtilitate Stoici praeualuerunt, qui tamen in naturalibus corporea omnia esse arbitrantes magis a carne quam a corpore animum auertere potuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Grant likewise someone who quickly sees that the mind itself, too, is not happy by its own good when it is happy, otherwise it would never be miserable; then one will give up inquiring whether that highest and, so to speak, beatifying good, or any part of it, is in the mind. For when the mind rejoices in itself as its own good, it is proud. But when it perceives that it is changeable, if only by this one fact, that from foolish it is made wise, and discerns that wisdom is unchangeable, it must at the same time discern that wisdom is above its own nature and that it rejoices more richly and surely by participation in it and illumination by it than by itself. So, ceasing and subsiding from its own boasting and inflation, it strives to cling to God and to be refreshed and reformed by that unchangeable one, from whom it now grasps that there comes not only every form of all things, whether those reached by the sense of the body or by the understanding of the mind, but even the very capacity for being formed, before formation, as when something formless is spoken of that can be formed. And so it feels that it is the less stable the less it clings to God, who supremely is; and that he supremely is because he neither advances nor declines by any change; but that for itself that change is beneficial by which it advances so as to cleave to him perfectly, whereas the change that consists in falling away is vicious; and that every falling away tends toward destruction; and although it is not evident whether anything actually reaches that point, yet it is evident to all that destruction leads to this, that a thing is not what it was. Hence it gathers that things fall away or can fall away for no other reason than that they were made from nothing; so that whatever in them is, namely that they exist and endure and, even in their failings, are ordered into the embrace of the universe, belongs to the goodness and omnipotence of him who supremely is and is the creator, who is able to make from nothing not only something but even something great; and that the first sin, that is, the first voluntary falling away, is to rejoice in one's own power; for it rejoices in something less than if it rejoiced in the power of God, which is certainly greater. Those who do not see this, and look at the powers of the human mind and the great beauty of its deeds and words, even if they were ashamed to place the highest good in the body, yet, by placing it in the mind itself, placed it lower than where it should be placed by the purest reason. Among the Greek philosophers who think thus, the Stoics prevailed both in number and in subtlety of argument; yet they, holding in natural philosophy that all things are corporeal, were able to turn the mind away from the flesh rather than from the body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.15 (CSEL 34.2:679–681; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-1/#p-118-15).

## Letter 118.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:681
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the Platonists, who placed the highest good in the enjoyment of God, opposed both the Epicureans and the Stoics while concealing their own doctrine.

### Latin text

Inter eos autem, qui fruendum deo, a quo et nos et omnia facta sunt, unum atque summum bonum nostrum esse dicunt, apud illos eminuerunt Platonici, qui non inmerito ad officium suum pertinere arbitrati sunt Stoicis et Epicureis maxime et prope solis omnino resistere. idem quippe Academici qui Platonici, quod docet auditorum ipsa successio. Arcesilas enim, qui primus occultata sententia sua nihil aliud istos quam refellere statuit, quaere, cui successerit: Polemonem inuenies; quaere, cui Polemon: Xenocraten; Xenocrati autem discipulo Academiam, scholam suam, reliquit Plato. quantum igitur pertinet ad quaestionem de summo hominis bono, remoue personas hominum atque ipsam disceptationem constitue: profecto reperies duos errores inter se aduersa fronte conlidi, unum constituentem in corpore alium constituentem in animo summum bonum, rationem autem ueritatis, qua summum bonum nostrum deus esse intellegitur, utrique resistere sed non prius docentem uera quam praua dedocentem. id ipsum rursum adiunctis personis constitue: reperies Epicureos et Stoicos inter se acerrime dimicantes, eorum uero litem conantes diiudicare Platonicos occultantes sententiam ueritatis et illorum uanam in falsitate fiduciam conuincentes et redarguentes.

### English translation (Claude)

Among those who say that our one and highest good is to enjoy God, by whom both we and all things were made, the Platonists stood out, who not undeservedly thought it part of their task to resist the Stoics and Epicureans above all and almost alone. For the Academics are the same as the Platonists, as the very succession of pupils shows. For Arcesilaus, who first, concealing his own opinion, resolved to do nothing but refute those men: ask whom he succeeded, and you will find Polemo; ask whom Polemo succeeded: Xenocrates; and to Xenocrates, his pupil, Plato left the Academy, his school. As far, then, as concerns the question of the highest good of man, remove the persons of the men and set up the debate itself: you will surely find two errors clashing head-on with each other, one placing the highest good in the body, the other placing it in the mind; while the reasoning of truth, by which God is understood to be our highest good, resists both, but does not teach the truth before it unteaches what is perverse. Set up the same thing again with the persons added: you will find the Epicureans and the Stoics fighting most fiercely with each other, and the Platonists, trying to settle their dispute, concealing the doctrine of truth while convicting and refuting the others' vain confidence in falsehood.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.16 (CSEL 34.2:681; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-16).

## Letter 118.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:681–682
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the Platonists lacked the example of Christ's humility and so could not lead the crowds to belief in the invisible God.

### Latin text

Sed non sicut illi errorum suorum ita Platonici uerae rationis personam implere potuerunt. omnibus enim defuit diuinae humilitatis exemplum, quod opportunissimo tempore per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum inlustratum est; cui uni exemplo in cuiusuis animo ferociter adrogantis omnis superbia cedit et frangitur et emoritur. ideoque non ualentes illi auctoritate turbas terrenarum rerum dilectione caecatas ad inuisibilium fidem ducere, cum eas uiderent Epicureis maxime contentionibus commoueri non solum ad hauriendam, quo ultro ferebantur, sed etiam ad defensitandam corporis uoluptatem, ut in ea summum bonum hominis constitueretur, eos autem, qui aduersus hanc uoluptatem uirtutis laude mouerentur, minus difficulter eam contemplari in animis hominum, unde facta bona, de quibus utcumque poterant iudicare, procederent, simul uidebant, si eis conarentur insinuare aliquam rem diuinam et supra omnia incommutabilem, quae nullo adtingeretur corporis sensu, sed sola mente intellegeretur, quae tamen etiam naturam ipsius mentis excederet, eumque esse deum propositum animo humano ad fruendum purgato ab omni labe humanarum cupiditatum, in quo uno adquiesceret omnis beatitudinis appetitus et in quo nobis uno bonorum omnium finis esset, non eos intellecturos et repugnantibus uel Epicureis uel Stoicis multo quam sibi facilius palmam daturos, ita ut uera salubrisque sententia, quod perniciosissimum est generi humano, inperitorum populorum inrisione sordesceret. et hoc in moralibus.

### English translation (Claude)

But the Platonists could not play the part of true reason as those others played the part of their errors. For they all lacked the example of divine humility, which was made manifest at the most opportune time through our Lord Jesus Christ; to that one example all pride yields, and is broken and dies, in the mind of anyone, however fiercely arrogant. And so they were not able by authority to lead to faith in invisible things the crowds blinded by love of earthly things. They saw these crowds stirred, chiefly by the arguments of the Epicureans, not only to drink in bodily pleasure, toward which they were carried of their own accord, but even to defend it, so that the highest good of man was placed in it; and they saw that those who were moved against this pleasure by the praise of virtue found it less difficult to contemplate the good in men's minds, from which good deeds proceeded, of which they could judge after a fashion. At the same time they saw that, if they tried to instill into them the notion of something divine and unchangeable above all things, reached by no sense of the body but understood by the mind alone, yet surpassing the nature of the mind itself, and taught that this is God, set before the human mind to be enjoyed once it has been purified from every stain of human desires, in whom alone every craving for happiness would rest and in whom alone we would have the end of all goods, they would not understand, and would much more readily give the palm to the Epicureans or Stoics opposing them than to themselves; so that the true and wholesome doctrine would be made contemptible by the derision of ignorant peoples, which is the most ruinous thing for the human race. So much for ethics.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.17 (CSEL 34.2:681–682; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-17).

## Letter 118.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:682–683
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that in natural philosophy the crowds would side with the materialist schools against the Platonists' incorporeal Wisdom.

### Latin text

In naturalibus autem quaestionibus si isti dicerent effectricem omnium naturarum esse incorpoream sapientiam, illi autem a corpore nusquam discederent, cum alii atomis alii quattuor elementis, in quibus ad efficienda omnia ignis praeualeret, principia rerum darent, quis non uideret stultorum abundantiam corpori deditam, cum incorpoream potentiam conditricem rerum nequaquam ualeret intueri, in quorum potius suffragium raperetur?

### English translation (Claude)

In questions of natural philosophy, if these men said that the maker of all natures is incorporeal wisdom, while the others never departed from the body, some giving atoms and others the four elements, among which fire prevailed for making all things, as the principles of things, who would not see to whose support the abundance of fools devoted to the body would rather be carried off, since it was quite unable to contemplate an incorporeal power as the creator of things?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.18 (CSEL 34.2:682–683; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-18).

## Letter 118.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:683
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that in logic too the Platonists' teaching that truth is grasped by the intellect alone would not be heard against schools that trusted the senses.

### Latin text

Restabat pars rationalium quaestionum. nosti enim, quicquid propter adipiscendam sapientiam quaeritur, aut de moribus aut de natura aut de ratione habere quaestionem. cum ergo Epicurei numquam sensus corporis falli dicerent, Stoici autem falli aliquando concederent, utrique tamen regulam comprehendendae ueritatis in sensibus ponerent, quis istis contra dicentibus audiret Platonicos? quis non modo in sapientium sed omnino in hominum numero habendos putaret, si ab eis prompte diceretur non solum esse aliquid, quod neque tactu corporis neque olfactu uel gustatu neque his auribus aut oculis percipi possit neque omnino talium rerum, quae ita sentirentur, aliqua imaginatione cogitari, sed id solum uere esse atque id solum posse percipi, quia incommutabile et sempiternum est, percipi autem sola intellegentia, qua una ueritas, quo modo adtingi potest, adtingitur?

### English translation (Claude)

There remained the part concerned with questions of reasoning. For you know that whatever is investigated for the attainment of wisdom concerns either conduct or nature or reason. Since, then, the Epicureans said that the senses of the body are never deceived, while the Stoics granted that they are sometimes deceived, but both placed the rule for grasping truth in the senses, who would listen to the Platonists contradicting them? Who would think them worth counting not merely among the wise but among men at all, if they readily said not only that there is something which can be perceived neither by bodily touch nor by smell or taste nor by these ears or eyes, nor even thought of by any imagining of the things so perceived, but that this alone truly is and this alone can be perceived, because it is unchangeable and eternal; and that it is perceived by the understanding alone, by which alone truth, so far as it can be reached, is reached?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.19 (CSEL 34.2:683; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-19).

## Letter 118.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:683–684
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that the dispute between Platonists and materialists lasted until the apostolic age, when Epicureans and Stoics opposed Paul at Athens.

### Latin text

Cum ergo talia sentirent Platonici, quae neque docerent carni deditos homines neque tanta essent auctoritate apud populos, ut credenda persuaderent, donec ad eum habitum perduceretur animus, quo ista capiuntur, elegerunt occultare sententiam suam et contra eos disserere, qui uerum se inuenisse iactarent, cum inuentionem ipsam ueri in carnis sensibus ponerent. et eorum quidem consilium quale fuerit, quid adtinet quaerere? diuinum certe uel diuina aliqua auctoritate praeditum non fuit. tantum illud adtende, quoniam Plato a Cicerone multis modis apertissime ostenditur in sapientia non humana sed plane diuina, unde humana quodam modo accenderetur, in illa utique sapientia prorsus inmutabili atque eodem modo semper se habente ueritate constituisse et finem boni et causas rerum et ratiocinandi fiduciam, oppugnatos autem esse nomine Epicureorum et Stoicorum a Platonicis eos, qui in corporis uel in animi natura ponerent et finem boni et causas rerum et ratiocinandi fiduciam, eo rem successione temporum esse deuolutam, ut Christianae iam aetatis exordio, cum rerum inuisibilium atque aeternarum fides per uisibilia miracula salubriter praedicaretur hominibus, qui nec uidere nec cogitare aliquid praeter corpora poterant, beato apostolo Paulo, qui eandem fidem gentibus praeseminabat, idem ipsi Epicurei et Stoici in actibus apostolorum contradixisse inueniantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, the Platonists held such views, which they could neither teach to men devoted to the flesh nor had such authority among the peoples as to persuade them to believe until the mind should be brought to the condition in which these things are grasped, they chose to conceal their opinion and to argue against those who boasted that they had found the truth, while they placed the very finding of truth in the senses of the flesh. And what sort of plan theirs was, why need we ask? It was certainly not divine or endowed with any divine authority. Only note this: Plato is shown by Cicero in many ways most plainly to have placed the end of good, the causes of things, and confidence in reasoning in a wisdom not human but plainly divine, from which human wisdom is in a way kindled; in that wisdom, surely, wholly unchangeable, and in the truth that is always the same. And those who placed the end of good, the causes of things, and confidence in reasoning in the nature of the body or of the mind were attacked by the Platonists under the names of Epicureans and Stoics. And the matter came down through the succession of the ages to the point that, at the very beginning of the Christian age, when faith in invisible and eternal things was being preached for their salvation, through visible miracles, to men who could neither see nor think of anything but bodies, these same Epicureans and Stoics are found in the Acts of the Apostles contradicting the blessed apostle Paul, who was sowing that same faith ahead among the Gentiles.

### Scripture references

- Acts 17:18: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.20 (CSEL 34.2:683–684; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-20).

## Letter 118.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-21
- Source: CSEL 34.2:684–685
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine observes that the old philosophical sects have fallen silent and that the Platonists, with a few changes, should submit to Christ, the incarnate Word.

### Latin text

Qua in re satis mihi uidetur esse demonstratum errores gentium siue de moribus siue de natura rerum siue de ratione inuestigandae ueritatis, qui quamuis essent multi atque multiplices, in his tamen maxime duabus sectis eminebant, expugnantibus doctis et tanta disserendi subtilitate atque copia subuertentibus durasse tamen usque in tempora Christiana. quos iam certe nostra aetate sic obmutuisse conspicimus, ut uix iam in scholis rhetorum commemoretur tantum, quae fuerint illorum sententiae, certamina tamen etiam de loquacissimis Graecorum gymnasiis eradicata atque compressa sint. ita ut, si qua nunc erroris secta contra ueritatem, hoc est contra ecclesiam Christi emerserit, nisi nomine cooperta Christiano ad pugnandum prosilire non audeat. ex quo intellegitur ipsos quoque Platonicae gentis philosophos paucis mutatis, quae Christiana inprobat disciplina, inuictissimo uni regi Christo pias ceruices oportere submittere et intellegere uerbum dei homine indutum, qui iussit et creditum est, quod illi uel proferre metuebant.

### English translation (Claude)

In this matter it seems to me sufficiently shown that the errors of the Gentiles, whether about conduct or about the nature of things or about the method of investigating truth, which, though many and manifold, were most prominent in these two sects, lasted on into Christian times, although learned men attacked them and overturned them with great subtlety and fullness of argument. Now, in our own age, we see that they have certainly fallen so silent that it is scarcely even mentioned any longer in the schools of the rhetoricians what their opinions were, and their contests have been rooted out and suppressed even from the most talkative gymnasia of the Greeks; so that, if any sect of error now rises up against the truth, that is, against the church of Christ, it does not dare to leap out to fight unless it is covered with the Christian name. From this it is understood that the philosophers of the Platonic race too, with a few things changed which Christian teaching disapproves, ought to bow their pious necks to the one most invincible King, Christ, and to understand the Word of God clothed with a man, who gave the command, and what they were afraid even to utter was believed.

### Scripture references

- John 1:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.21 (CSEL 34.2:684–685; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-21).

## Letter 118.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-22
- Source: CSEL 34.2:685–686
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Dioscorus that the way to truth is humility, first, second, and third, as the orator said of delivery.

### Latin text

Huic te, mi Dioscore, ut tota pietate subdas uelim nec aliam tibi ad capessendam et obtinendam ueritatem uiam munias, quam quae munita est ab illo, qui gressuum nostrorum tamquam deus uidit infirmitatem. ea est autem prima humilitas, secunda humilitas, tertia humilitas et, quotiens interrogares, hoc dicerem, non quo alia non sint praecepta, quae dicantur, sed nisi humilitas omnia, quaecumque bene facimus, et praecesserit et comitata et consecuta fuerit et proposita, quam intueamur, et adposita, cui adhaereamus, et inposita, qua reprimamur, iam nobis de aliquo bono facto gaudentibus totum extorquet de manu superbia. uitia quippe cetera in peccatis, superbia uero etiam in recte factis timenda est, ne illa, quae laudabiliter facta sunt, ipsius laudis cupiditate amittantur. itaque, sicut rhetor ille nobilissimus cum interrogatus esset, quid ei primum uideretur in eloquentiae praeceptis obseruari oportere, pronuntiationem dicitur respondisse, cum quaereretur, quid secundo, eandem pronuntiationem, quid tertio, nihil aliud quam pronuntiationem dixisse, si interrogares et quotiens interrogares de praeceptis Christianae religionis, nihil me aliud respondere nisi humilitatem liberet, etsi forte alia dicere necessitas cogeret.

### English translation (Claude)

To him, my Dioscorus, I would have you submit yourself with complete piety, and build for yourself no other road for grasping and holding the truth than the one built by him who, being God, saw the weakness of our steps. And that road is, first, humility; second, humility; third, humility; and as often as you asked, I would say this. Not that there are no other precepts to be stated; but unless humility precedes, accompanies, and follows whatever we do well, and is set before us to look at, set beside us to cling to, and set upon us to restrain us, pride wrenches everything out of our hands while we are already rejoicing over some good deed. For other vices are to be feared in sins, but pride is to be feared even in right actions, lest what has been done laudably be lost through desire for the praise itself. And so, just as that most famous orator, when asked what seemed to him the first thing to be observed among the precepts of eloquence, is said to have answered “delivery,” and when asked what was second, “delivery” again, and what third, nothing but “delivery”; so if you asked, and as often as you asked, about the precepts of the Christian religion, I would choose to answer nothing but “humility,” even if necessity perhaps compelled me to speak of other things.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, De or. 3.213 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The orator is Demosthenes; the saying is reported by Cicero (De oratore 3.213; Brutus 142) and Quintilian 11.3.6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.22 (CSEL 34.2:685–686; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-22).

## Letter 118.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-23
- Source: CSEL 34.2:686–687
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that one who knows that God is present everywhere whole, like truth, and that the Word is begotten in a unique way, need not trouble about Anaximenes' view that air is God.

### Latin text

Huic humilitati saluberrimae, quam dominus noster Iesus Christus ut doceret humiliatus est, huic, inquam, maxime aduersatur quaedam, ut ita dicam, inperitissima scientia, dum nos scire gaudemus, quid Anaximenes, quid Anaxagoras, quid Pythagoras, quid Democritus senserit, et cetera huius modi, ut docti eruditique uideamur, cum hoc a uera doctrina et eruditione longe absit. qui enim didicerit deum non distendi aut diffundi per locos neque finitos neque infinitos, quasi in aliqua parte maior sit in aliqua minor, sed totum ubique esse praesentem sicut ueritatem, cuius nemo sobrie dicit partem esse in isto loco et partem in illo, quoniam ueritas utique deus est, nequaquam eum mouebit, quod de infinito aere sensit, quicumque sensit, quod ipse esset deus. quid ad illum, si nesciat, quam dicant isti corporis formam — eam quippe dicunt, quae undique finita sit — et utrum refellendi causa tamquam Academicus Anaximeni Cicero obiecerit formam et pulchritudinem deum habere oportere quasi corpoream speciem cogitans, quia ille corporeum deum esse dixerat, aer enim corpus est; an ipse sentiebat esse formam et pulchritudinem incorpoream ueritati, qua ipse animus informatur et per quam omnia sapientis facta pulchra esse iudicamus, ut non tantum refellendi gratia sed etiam uerissime dixerit, quod deum pulcherrima specie deceat esse, quia nihil est pulchrius ipsa intellegibili atque incommutabili ueritate? quod autem ait ille gigni aerem, quem tamen deum esse censebat, nullo modo mouet hunc uirum, qui intellegit, non sicut aer gignitur, id est aliqua causa, ut sit, efficitur, cum omnino deus non sit, ita genitum esse uerbum dei, deum apud deum, sed longe alio modo, quem nemo, nisi cui deus ipse inspirarit, intelleget. illum autem etiam in ipsis corporibus desipere quis non uideat, cum aerem gigni dicat et deum uelit, eum autem, a quo aer gignitur, non enim a nullo gigni potest, non dicat deum? cum autem dicitur aer esse semper in motu, nequaquam conturbabit hominem, ut propterea illum deum putet, qui nouit omnis corporis motum inferiorem esse, quam est motus animi, motum autem animi longe pigriorem, quam est motus summae atque incommutabilis sapientiae.

### English translation (Claude)

This most wholesome humility, which our Lord Jesus Christ was humbled in order to teach, this, I say, is most opposed by a certain, so to speak, most ignorant knowledge, when we rejoice to know what Anaximenes, Anaxagoras, Pythagoras, and Democritus thought, and other things of this kind, so that we may seem learned and erudite, whereas this is far from true learning and erudition. For one who has learned that God is not stretched out or spread through places, whether finite or infinite, as though he were greater in one part and smaller in another, but is present everywhere whole, like truth, of which no sober person says that part is in this place and part in that (since truth, of course, is God), will not at all be moved by what was thought, by whoever thought it, about infinite air being itself God. What is it to him if he does not know what shape of body those men speak of (for they speak of one bounded on every side), and whether Cicero, as an Academic, objected to Anaximenes, to refute him, that God must have shape and beauty, thinking as it were of a bodily appearance because Anaximenes had said that God was corporeal (for air is a body); or whether Cicero himself thought that there is an incorporeal shape and beauty in truth, by which the mind itself is formed and through which we judge all the deeds of the wise man to be beautiful, so that he said, not only for the sake of refutation but most truly, that it befits God to be of the most beautiful form, because nothing is more beautiful than intelligible and unchangeable truth itself? And that Anaximenes said that air is begotten, though he held it to be God, does not move such a man at all, for he understands that the Word of God, God with God, was not begotten as air is begotten, that is, made to exist by some cause, since air is not God at all, but in a far different way, which no one will understand unless God himself inspires him. And who would not see that Anaximenes is foolish even about bodies, since he says that air is begotten and wants it to be God, but does not call that by which air is begotten God (for it cannot be begotten by nothing)? And when it is said that air is always in motion, this will in no way disturb a man so as to make him think it God for that reason, if he knows that every motion of a body is lower than the motion of a mind, and that the motion of a mind is far slower than the motion of the supreme and unchangeable wisdom.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:8: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:1: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.26 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The arguments about Anaximenes and Anaxagoras are from Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.23 (CSEL 34.2:686–687; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-23).

## Letter 118.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-24
- Source: CSEL 34.2:687–688
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts Anaxagoras's “Mind” as a name for divine Wisdom and answers Cicero's objections, which treat the infinite as if it were a body.

### Latin text

Item Anaxagoras siue quilibet si mentem dicit ipsam ueritatem atque sapientiam, quid mihi est de uerbo cum homine contendere? manifestum est enim omnium rerum descriptionem et modum ab illa fieri eamque non incongrue dici infinitam non per spatia locorum sed per potentiam, quae cogitatione humana comprehendi non potest, neque quod informe aliquid sit ipsa sapientia; hoc enim corporum est, ut, quaecumque infinita fuerint, sint et informia. Cicero autem studio refellendi, quantum uidetur, propter aduersarios corporaliter sentientes negat infinito aliquid iungi potuisse, quia ex ea parte, qua quidque adiungitur, necesse est esse in corporibus aliquem finem. ideo ait non eum uidisse neque motum sensui iunctum et continentem) - id est continua copulatione adhaerentem — (infinito) — id est infinitae rei — ullum esse posse, quasi de corporibus ageret, quibus nihil iungi nisi per fines locorum potest. sic autem addidit: Neque sensum omnino, quo non tota natura pulsa sentiret, quasi ille dixisset mentem illam ordinatricem et moderatricem rerum omnium habere sensum, qualem habet anima per corpus. nam manifestum est totam sentire animam, cum per corpus aliquid sentit; nam totam utique non latet, quicquid illud est, quod sentitur. ad hoc autem dixit totam naturam sentire, ut illi quasi auferret, quod ait mentem infinitam. quo modo enim tota sentit, si infinita est? sensus enim corporis ab aliquo loco incipit nec percurrit totum, nisi ad cuius finem peruenerit, quod in infinito dici non potest. sed neque ille de sensu corporis aliquid dixerat et aliter dicitur totum, quod incorporeum est, quia sine finibus locorum intellegitur, ut et totum et infinitum dici possit: totum propter integritatem, infinitum, quia locorum finibus non ambitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise, if Anaxagoras or anyone else calls truth and wisdom itself “Mind,” why should I quarrel with a man over a word? For it is manifest that the ordering and measure of all things are made by it, and that it is not unfittingly called infinite, not through spaces of place but through power, which cannot be comprehended by human thought; nor is wisdom itself something formless, for it is a property of bodies that whatever is infinite is also formless. But Cicero, out of zeal for refutation, it seems, and because of opponents who thought in bodily terms, denies that anything could be joined to the infinite, because in bodies there must be some boundary at the side where anything is joined. Therefore he says that Anaxagoras did not see that there can be no motion joined to sense and “continuous” (that is, adhering by a continuous connection) “with the infinite” (that is, with an infinite thing), as if he were dealing with bodies, to which nothing can be joined except through the boundaries of places. And he added: “Nor any sense at all, unless the whole of nature, being struck, felt it,” as if Anaxagoras had said that the Mind which orders and governs all things has sense such as the soul has through the body. For it is manifest that the whole soul feels when it feels something through the body; for whatever is felt is certainly not hidden from the whole soul. But Cicero said that the whole nature feels in order to take away, as it were, what Anaxagoras said, that Mind is infinite. For how does the whole feel, if it is infinite? For the sense of the body begins from some place and does not run through the whole unless it reaches its boundary, which cannot be said of the infinite. But Anaxagoras had said nothing about bodily sense; and that which is incorporeal is called a whole in another way, because it is understood without boundaries of place, so that it can be called both whole and infinite: whole because of its integrity, infinite because it is not encompassed by boundaries of place.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.26 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.24 (CSEL 34.2:687–688; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-24).

## Letter 118.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-25
- Source: CSEL 34.2:688–689
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine examines Cicero's objection that Anaxagoras's Mind must be either a living being with a body or beyond understanding.

### Latin text

Deinde, inquit, si mentem ipsam quasi animal aliquod esse uoluit, erit aliquid interius, ex quo illud animal nominetur, ut mens ista quasi corpus sit et habeat intus animam, unde animal appelletur. uide quem ad modum corporali consuetudine loquitur, quo modo solent uideri animalia, propter sensum grossum, ut opinor, eorum, contra, quos disserit; et tamen dixit rem, quae illos, si euigilare possent, satis admoneret, omne, quod sicut corpus uiuum animo occurrit, magis habere animam et esse animal, quam animam esse cogitari oportere. hoc est enim, quod ait: Erit aliquid interius. ex quo illud animal nominetur. sed adiungit: Quid autem interius mente? non ergo potest mens habere interiorem animam, ut sit animal, quia ipsa est interior. ergo corpus habeat extrinsecus, cui sit interior, ut sit animal!. hoc est enim, quod ait: Cingatur igitur corpore externo, quasi Anaxagoras dixerit, nisi animalis alicuius esset, mentem esse non posse, si mentem ipsam summam sapientiam esse sentiebat, quae nullius quasi animantis propria est, quia omnibus animis se frui ualentibus ueritas communiter praesto est. et ideo uide, quam urbane concludat: Quod quoniam non placet, inquit, — hoc est non placet Anaxagorae, ut illa mens, quam dicit deum, cingatur corpore externo, quo animal esse possit, — aperta simplexque mens nulla re adiuncta, qua sentire possit, — id est nullo corpore adiuncto, per quod sentire possit, — fugere intellegentiae nostrae uim et notionem uidetur.

### English translation (Claude)

“Then,” he says, “if he meant Mind itself to be a kind of living being, there will be something more inward from which that living being gets its name,” so that this mind is like a body and has a soul within, from which it is called a living being. See how he speaks according to bodily habit, in the way living beings are usually seen, because, I think, of the gross perception of those against whom he is arguing; and yet he said something that would sufficiently warn them, if they could wake up: that everything which presents itself to the mind like a living body ought rather to be thought to have a soul and to be a living being than to be a soul. For this is what he says: “There will be something more inward from which that living being gets its name.” But he adds: “But what is more inward than mind?” Therefore mind cannot have a soul more inward than itself so as to be a living being, since it is itself the inward thing. So let it have a body outside, to which it is inward, so that it may be a living being! For this is what he says: “Let it then be enclosed by an external body”; as if Anaxagoras had said that mind could not exist unless it belonged to some living being, though he held that Mind itself is the supreme wisdom, which belongs properly to no animate being, because truth is present in common to all souls that are able to enjoy it. And so see how wittily he concludes: “Since this does not please,” he says (that is, it does not please Anaxagoras that the Mind he calls God be enclosed by an external body by which it could be a living being), “a mind open and simple, joined to nothing by which it could feel” (that is, joined to no body through which it could feel), “seems to escape the force and notion of our understanding.”

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.27 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.26–27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.25 (CSEL 34.2:688–689; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-25).

## Letter 118.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-26
- Source: CSEL 34.2:689–690
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that the incorporeal Wisdom escapes only materialists, and that truth is to be loved because it is true, not because Anaxagoras knew it.

### Latin text

Nihil uerius quam fugere hoc uim et notionem intellegentiae Stoicorum et Epicureorum, qui nisi corporalia cogitare non possunt. quod autem ait nostrae., humanae intellegi uoluit; et bene non ait fugit sed fugere uidetur; hoc enim illis uidetur neminem hoc posse intellegere et ideo nihil tale esse arbitrantur. sed quorundam intellegentiam, quantum homini datum est, non fugit esse apertam simplicemque sapientiam atque ueritatem, quae nullius animantis sit propria, sed qua communiter omnis, quae id potest, anima sapiens et uerax efficitur. quam si sensit esse Anaxagoras eumque deum esse uidit mentemque appellauit, non solum nomen Anaxagorae, quod propter litteratam uetustatem omnes, ut militariter loquar, litteriones libenter sufflant, nos doctos et sapientes non facit sed ne ipsa quidem eius cognitio, qua id uerum esse cognouit. non enim mihi propterea ueritas cara esse debet, quia non latuit Anaxagoram, sed quia ueritas est, etiam si nullus eam cognouisset illorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Nothing is truer than that this escapes the force and notion of the understanding of the Stoics and Epicureans, who cannot think of anything but bodily things. By saying “our” he meant human understanding; and he rightly does not say “escapes” but “seems to escape,” for to them it seems that no one can understand this, and so they think there is nothing of the kind. But it does not escape the understanding of some, so far as is granted to man, that there is an open and simple wisdom and truth, which belongs properly to no animate being, but by which every soul capable of it is made wise and truthful in common. If Anaxagoras perceived that this exists and saw that it is God and called it Mind, not only does the name of Anaxagoras, which all the petty letter-men, to speak in soldiers' slang, gladly puff up because of its literary antiquity, not make us learned and wise, but not even his knowledge itself does, by which he knew this to be true. For truth ought not to be dear to me because it was not hidden from Anaxagoras, but because it is the truth, even if none of them had known it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.26 (CSEL 34.2:689–690; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-26).

## Letter 118.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-27
- Source: CSEL 34.2:690–691
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine deplores Democritus's teaching that the gods are images flowing from bodies, and asks from what body the image of truth could come.

### Latin text

Si igitur nec eius hominis, qui uerum forsitan uidit, cognitio nos inflare debet, ut ea quasi docti esse uideamur, sed ipsius ueri solidare, qua uere docti esse possumus, quanto minus eorum hominum, qui falsa senserunt, nomina et dogmata nostram possunt adiuuare doctrinam et latentia cognita facere, cum, si homines sumus, magis nos contristari deceat tot et tam nobilitatorum hominum erroribus, si eos audire contigerit, quam haec propterea studiose quaerere, ut inter eos, qui illa nesciunt, iactatione inanissima uentilemur! quanto enim melius ne audissem quidem nomen Democriti, quam cum dolore cogitarem, nescio quem suis temporibus magnum putatum, qui deos esse arbitraretur imagines, quae de solidis corporibus fluerent solidaeque ipsae non essent, easque hac atque hac motu proprio circumeundo atque inlabendo in animos hominum facere, ut uis diuina cogitetur, cum profecto illud corpus, unde imago flueret, quanto solidius est, praestantius esse iudicetur! ideoque fluctuauit eius, sicut isti dicunt, nutauitque sententia, ut aliquando naturam quandam, de qua fluerent imagines, deum esse diceret, qui tamen cogitari non posset nisi per eas imagines, quas fundit ac mittit, id est quae de illa natura, quam nescio quam corpoream et sempiternam ac per hoc etiam diuinam putat, quasi uaporis similitudine continua uelut emanatione ferrentur et uenirent atque intrarent in animos nostros, ut deum uel deos cogitare possemus. nullam enim aliam causam cuiuslibet cogitationis nostrae opinantur isti, nisi cum ab his corporibus, quae cogitamus, ueniunt atque intrant imagines in animos nostros, quasi non multa ac prope innumerabilia cogitentur incorporaliter atque intellegibiliter ab eis, qui talia cogitare nouerunt, sicut ipsa sapientia et ueritas. quam si isti non cogitant, miror, quo modo de illa utcumque disputent; si autem cogitant, uellem mihi dicerent, uel de quo corpore uel qualis in eorum animos ueniat imago ueritatis.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, not even the knowledge of a man who perhaps saw the truth ought to puff us up, so that by it we may seem learned, but the knowledge of the truth itself ought to make us solid, by which we can be truly learned, how much less can the names and doctrines of men who held false views help our learning and make hidden things known! If we are men, it would befit us rather to be saddened by the errors of so many and such celebrated men, if we happen to hear of them, than to seek these things out eagerly so as to be blown about with the emptiest boasting among those who do not know them. For how much better had I never even heard the name of Democritus than to think with sorrow that someone thought great in his own time held that the gods are images which flow from solid bodies and are not themselves solid, and that by going round here and there by their own motion and gliding into the minds of men they cause the divine power to be thought of; when certainly the body from which the image flows would be judged more excellent the more solid it is! And so his opinion, as these men say, fluctuated and wavered, so that at times he said that a certain nature from which images flow is God, which yet could not be thought of except through the images it pours out and sends forth, that is, images which are carried from that nature (which he thinks is I know not what corporeal and everlasting thing, and therefore also divine) by a continuous emanation, like vapor, and come and enter our minds so that we can think of God or gods. For these men suppose no other cause of any thought of ours than that images come from the bodies we think of and enter our minds; as if many, almost innumerable things were not thought of incorporeally and intelligibly by those who know how to think of such things, such as wisdom and truth itself. If these men do not think of it, I wonder how they dispute about it at all; but if they do think of it, I wish they would tell me from what body, or of what kind, the image of truth comes into their minds.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.120 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Democritus's views are reported from Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.29 and 1.120.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.27 (CSEL 34.2:690–691; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-27).

## Letter 118.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-28
- Source: CSEL 34.2:691–692
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes the atomist theories of Democritus and Epicurus about the gods and the images by which things are thought of.

### Latin text

Quamquam Democritus etiam hoc distare in naturalibus quaestionibus ab Epicuro dicitur, quod iste sentit inesse concursioni atomorum uim quandam animalem et spirabilem, qua ui eum credo et (imagines) ipsas diuinitate praeditas) dicere, non omnes omnium rerum sed deorum, et principia mentis esse in uniuerso, quibus diuinitatem tribuit, et animantes imagines, quae uel prodesse nobis soleant uel nocere. Epicurus uero neque aliquid in principiis rerum ponit praeter atomos, id est corpuscula quaedam tam minuta, ut iam diuidi nequeant neque sentiri aut uisu aut tactu possint. quorum corpusculorum concursu fortuito et mundos innumerabiles et animantia et ipsas animas fieri dicit et deos, quos humana forma non in aliquo mundo sed extra mundos atque inter mundos constituit; et non uult omnino aliquid praeter corpora cogitare, quae tamen ut cogitet, imagines dicit ab ipsis rebus, quas atomis formari putat, defluere atque in animum introire subtiliores, quam sunt illae imagines, quae ad oculos ueniunt — nam et uidendi causam hanc esse dicit —, ingentes autem quasdam imagines, ita ut uniuersum mundum complectantur extrinsecus. intellegis enim iam, ut arbitror, quas isti opinentur imagines.

### English translation (Claude)

Democritus is also said to differ from Epicurus in questions of natural philosophy in this, that he holds that there is in the concourse of atoms a certain animate and breathing force; by this force, I believe, he says both that the “images” themselves “are endowed with divinity” (not all images of all things, but those of the gods), and that the principles of mind are “in the universe,” to which he attributes divinity, and that there are living images which are wont either to benefit or to harm us. But Epicurus places nothing among the principles of things except atoms, that is, certain little bodies so minute that they can no longer be divided, nor perceived by sight or touch. By the chance concourse of these little bodies he says that innumerable worlds and living beings and souls themselves come to be, and gods, whom he places in human form, not in any world, but outside the worlds and between the worlds; and he will not think of anything at all except bodies. Yet in order to think of them, he says that images flow down from the things themselves, which he thinks are formed by atoms, and enter the mind, images subtler than those that come to the eyes (for he says that this is the cause of seeing too), and some enormous images, so large that they embrace the whole world from outside. For you understand now, I think, what images these men suppose.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.120 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.120.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.28 (CSEL 34.2:691–692; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-28).

## Letter 118.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-29
- Source: CSEL 34.2:692–693
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refutes the atomist theory of images by showing that vast images could not touch a small mind or small eyes as wholes.

### Latin text

Miror non admonuisse Democritum uel hoc ipso falsa esse, quae dicit, quia uenientes tam magnae imagines in tam breuem animum nostrum, si corporeus, ut illi uolunt, tam paruo corpore includitur, totae illum tangere non possunt. a magno enim corpore cum paruum corpus adtingitur, a toto simul adtingi nullo pacto potest. quo modo igitur totae simul cogitantur, si in tantum cogitantur, in quantum uenientes atque intrantes animum adtingunt, quae nec totae intrare possunt per tam paruum corpus nec totae tam paruum animum adtingere? memento me secundum illos haec dicere — non enim ego talem animum sentio — aut, si incorporeum Democritus animum existimat, Epicurus quidem solus ista ratione urgeri potest; sed etiam ille quare non uidit non opus esse nec fieri posse, ut incorporeus animus aduentu atque contactu corporearum imaginum cogitet? de uisu certe oculorum ambo pariter redarguuntur; tam enim breues oculos tam grandia imaginum corpora tota adtingere nullo modo possunt.

### English translation (Claude)

I wonder that Democritus was not warned that what he says is false, if only by this: that images so large, coming into our mind, which is so small, cannot touch it as wholes if, being corporeal, as they hold, it is enclosed in so small a body. For when a small body is touched by a large body, it can by no means be touched by the whole of it at once. How then are the images thought of as wholes at once, if they are thought of in so far as, coming and entering, they touch the mind, when they can neither enter whole through so small a body nor touch so small a mind as wholes? Remember that I say these things according to their view, for I do not hold such a view of the mind. Or, if Democritus thinks the mind incorporeal, then Epicurus alone can be pressed by this argument; but why did not Democritus too see that there is no need, and that it is impossible, for an incorporeal mind to think through the arrival and contact of corporeal images? On the sight of the eyes, certainly, both are refuted alike; for the bodies of the images, being so great, can in no way touch as wholes eyes that are so small.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.29 (CSEL 34.2:692–693; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-29).

## Letter 118.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-30
- Source: CSEL 34.2:693–694
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports Cicero's refutation of the Epicurean claim that gods made of flowing atoms and images could be eternal.

### Latin text

Cum autem quaeritur ab eis, quare una imago uideatur corporis alicuius, a quo innumerabiliter imagines fluunt, respondent eo ipso, quo frequenter fluunt et transeunt imagines, quasi quadam earum constipatione et densitate fieri, ut ex multis una uideatur. quam uanitatem Cicero ita refellit, ut eo ipso neget aeternum deum eorum posse cogitari, quo innumerabiliter fluentibus et labentibus imaginibus cogitatur. et quoniam innumerabilitate atomorum suppeditante dicunt fieri formas deorum sempiternas, cum ita discedunt quaedam corpuscula de diuino corpore, ut alia succedant et dissolui illam naturam eadem successione non sinant, omnia ergo, inquit, aeterna essent, quia nulli deest ista innumerabilitas atomorum, quae perpetuas ruinas subinde suppleat. deinde quo modo non uereatur iste deus, ne intereat, cum sine ulla intermissione pulsetur agiteturque atomorum incursione sempiterna? pulsari enim dicit illud corpus, quod inruentibus atomis feriatur, et agitari, quod penetretur. deinde cum ex ipso imagines, de quibus iam satis dictum est, semper adfluant, quo modo potest de inmortalitate confidere?

### English translation (Claude)

But when they are asked why a single image is seen of a body from which images flow innumerably, they answer that by the very fact that the images flow and pass so frequently, a kind of crowding and density of them causes one to be seen out of many. Cicero refutes this vanity by denying, on that very ground, that their god can be thought of as eternal, since he is thought of through images flowing and gliding innumerably. And since they say that the forms of the gods are made everlasting by the supply furnished by the innumerable atoms, as some little bodies depart from the divine body in such a way that others take their place and by this same succession do not allow that nature to be dissolved: “All things, then,” he says, “would be eternal,” because no thing lacks this innumerable supply of atoms to repair its perpetual ruins time and again. Then, how would this god not fear perishing, since he is struck and shaken without any intermission by the everlasting onrush of atoms? For he says that the body is “struck” because it is hit by the atoms rushing in, and “shaken” because it is penetrated. Then, “since images,” about which enough has now been said, “are always flowing out from him, how can he be confident of immortality?”

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Nat. d. 1.114 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.105–114.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.30 (CSEL 34.2:693–694; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-30).

## Letter 118.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-31
- Source: CSEL 34.2:694–695
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that chance collisions of atoms could not produce ordered forms and that the atomists' own theory of images undermines the existence of atoms.

### Latin text

In quibus omnibus deliramentis haec opinantium illud praecipue dolendum est, quod non sufficit enarrari, ut nulla cuiusquam disputatione aduersante respuantur, sed acutissimorum hominum ingenia id etiam negotium susceperunt, ut copiose ista refellerent, quae statim dicta etiam a tardissimis derideri abicique debuerunt. si enim concesseris esse atomos, si concesseris etiam concursu fortuito se ipsas pellere et agitare, num et illud eis fas est concedere, ut inter se atomi fortuito concurrentes rem aliquam ita conficiant, ut eam forma modificent, figura determinent, aequalitate poliant, colore inlustrent, anima uegetent? quae omnia nullo modo nisi arte diuinae prouidentiae fieri uidet, quisquis magis mente quam oculis amat uidere idque ab eo expetit, a quo factus est. nam nec ipsas atomos esse ullo modo concedendum est, quod omissa subtilitate, quae de diuisione corporum a doctis traditur, uide quam facile secundum ipsorum opinionem possit ostendi. certe enim ipsi dicunt omnia, quae sint naturae. nihil esse aliud quam corpora et inane quaeque his accidant, quod credo motum et pulsum dicere et consequentes formas. dicant ergo, in quo genere ponant imagines, quas de corporibus solidioribus adfluere putant ipsas minime solidas, ita ut tactu nisi oculorum, cum uidemus, et animi, cum cogitamus. sentiri non possint, si et ipsa corpora sunt. nam ita censent. ut exire a corpore et uenire ad oculos uel ad animum possint, quem nihilo minus dicunt esse corporeum. quaero, utrum etiam ab ipsis atomis adfluant imagines? si adfluunt, quo modo iam sunt atomi, a quibus aliqua corpora separantur? si non adfluunt, aut potest aliquid sine imaginibus cogitari, quod uehementer nolunt, aut unde norunt atomos, quas nec cogitare potuerunt? sed iam pudet me ista refellere, cum eos non puduerit ista sentire; cum uero ausi sunt etiam defendere, non iam eorum sed ipsius generis humani me pudet, cuius aures haec ferre potuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

In all these ravings of those who hold such opinions, this is especially to be lamented: that it is not enough merely to state them for them to be rejected without anyone needing to argue against them, but the minds of the sharpest men have even undertaken the task of refuting at length things that ought to have been laughed at and thrown out by the slowest as soon as they were said. For if you grant that there are atoms, if you grant also that they strike and shake one another by chance concourse, is it right to grant them this too, that atoms meeting each other by chance should so put a thing together as to give it measure by form, define it by shape, polish it by evenness, brighten it by color, and quicken it by a soul? Whoever loves to see with the mind rather than with the eyes, and seeks this from him by whom he was made, sees that all these things can in no way come about except by the art of divine providence. Indeed, it must not be granted at all that atoms exist; and, setting aside the subtle arguments handed down by the learned about the division of bodies, see how easily this can be shown according to their own opinion. For they certainly say that whatever natures there are, are nothing but bodies and void and the things that happen to these, by which I believe they mean motion and impact and the forms that follow. Let them say, then, in what class they put the images which they think flow from more solid bodies while being themselves by no means solid, so that they cannot be sensed except by the touch of the eyes when we see and of the mind when we think, if they too are bodies. For they hold that they are, so that they may be able to go out from a body and come to the eyes or to the mind, which they nonetheless say is corporeal. I ask whether images also flow from the atoms themselves. If they do, how then are they atoms, if some bodies are separated from them? If they do not, then either something can be thought of without images, which they strongly deny, or how did they come to know the atoms, which they could not think of? But I am now ashamed to refute these things, since they were not ashamed to hold them; and when they dared even to defend them, I am ashamed no longer of them but of the human race itself, whose ears could bear these things.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.31 (CSEL 34.2:694–695; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-31).

## Letter 118.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-32
- Source: CSEL 34.2:695–696
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the incarnation of Truth was the best provision for leading humanity to truth by faith, and that the church combines authority with reason.

### Latin text

Cum igitur tanta sit caecitas mentium per ingluuiem peccatorum amoremque carnis, ut etiam ista sententiarum portenta otia doctorum conterere disputando potuerint, dubitabis tu, Dioscore, uel quisquam uigilanti ingenio praeditus nullo modo ad sequendam ueritatem melius consuli potuisse generi humano, quam ut homo ab ipsa ueritate susceptus ineffabiliter atque mirabiliter et ipsius in terris personam gerens recta praecipiendo et diuina faciendo salubriter credi persuaderet, quod nondum prudenter posset intellegi? huius nos gloriae seruimus, huic te inmobiliter atque constanter credere hortamur, per quem factum est, ut non pauci sed populi etiam, qui non possunt ista diiudicare ratione, fide inrideant, donec salutaribus praeceptis adminiculati euadant ab his perplexitatibus in auras purissimae atque sincerissimae ueritatis. cuius auctoritati tanto deuotius obtemperari oportet, quanto uidemus nullum iam errorem se audere extollere ad congregandas sibi turbas inperitorum, qui non Christiani nominis uelamenta conquirat, eos autem solos ex ueteribus praeter Christianum nomen in conuenticulis suis aliquanto frequentius perdurare. qui scripturas eas tenent, per quas adnuntiatum esse ipsum dominum Iesum Christum se intellegere et uidere dissimulant. porro illi, qui, cum in unitate atque communione catholica non sint, Christiano tamen nomine gloriantur, coguntur aduersari credentibus et audent inperitos quasi ratione traducere, quando maxime cum ista medicina dominus uenerit, ut fidem populis imperaret. sed hoc facere coguntur, ut dixi, quia iacere se abiectissime sentiunt, si eorum auctoritas cum auctoritate catholica conferatur. conantur ergo auctoritatem stabilissimam fundatissimae ecclesiae quasi rationis nomine et pollicitatione superare. omnium enim haereticorum quasi regularis est ista temeritas. sed ille fidei clementissimus imperator et per conuentus celeberrimos populorum atque gentium sedesque ipsas apostolorum arce auctoritatis muniuit ecclesiam et per pauciores pie doctos et uere spiritales uiros copiosissimis apparatibus etiam inuictissimae rationis armauit. uerum illa rectissima disciplina est in arcem fidei quam maxime recipi infirmos, ut pro eis iam tutissime positis fortissima ratione pugnetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, there is such blindness of minds through the gluttony of sins and the love of the flesh that even these monstrous opinions could consume the leisure of the learned in disputation, will you doubt, Dioscorus, or will anyone endowed with a wakeful mind doubt, that no better provision could have been made for the human race to follow the truth than that a man, taken up ineffably and wonderfully by Truth itself and bearing its person on earth, should by enjoining right things and doing divine things persuade men, for their salvation, to believe what could not yet be wisely understood? It is his glory we serve; it is in him we exhort you to believe, immovably and constantly, through whom it has come about that not a few, but whole peoples, who cannot judge these things by reason, laugh at them by faith, until, supported by his saving precepts, they escape from these perplexities into the air of the purest and most sincere truth. To his authority we ought to submit all the more devoutly, the more we see that no error now dares to raise itself up to gather crowds of the unskilled without seeking the cloak of the Christian name, and that, among the ancient groups apart from the Christian name, only those persist somewhat more widely in their gatherings who hold the Scriptures through which the Lord Jesus Christ himself was announced, though they pretend not to understand and see this. Further, those who glory in the Christian name although they are not in Catholic unity and communion are compelled to oppose believers, and dare to lead the unskilled astray as if by reason, whereas the Lord came above all with this medicine, to command faith of the peoples. But they are compelled to do this, as I said, because they feel that they lie utterly prostrate if their authority is compared with Catholic authority. So they try to overcome the most stable authority of the most firmly founded church by the name and promise of reason, as it were. For this rashness is, so to speak, the rule of all heretics. But that most merciful emperor of faith has both fortified his church with the citadel of authority, through the most crowded assemblies of peoples and nations and the very sees of the apostles, and through fewer men, piously learned and truly spiritual, has armed it with the most abundant equipment of most invincible reason too. But the most correct discipline is that the weak be received as far as possible into the citadel of faith, so that, once they are placed there in full safety, the battle may be fought for them with the strongest reason.

### Translation notes

- Those who “hold the Scriptures” announcing Christ are the Jews; the statement is Augustine's own and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.32 (CSEL 34.2:695–696; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-32).

## Letter 118.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-33
- Source: CSEL 34.2:696–697
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how the Platonists of Plotinus's school either fell into magic or became Christians, so that authority and reason are now found in Christ and his church.

### Latin text

Platonici uero, qui falsorum philosophorum erroribus illo tempore circumlatrantibus non habentes diuinam personam, qua imperarent fidem, sententiam suam tegere quaerendam quam polluendam proferre maluerunt, cum iam Christi nomen terrenis regnis admirantibus perturbatisque crebresceret, emergere coeperant ad proferendum atque aperiendum, quid Plato sensisset. tunc Plotini schola Romae floruit habuitque condiscipulos multos acutissimos et sollertissimos uiros. sed aliqui eorum magicarum artium curiositate deprauati sunt, aliqui dominum Iesum Christum ipsius ueritatis atque sapientiae incommutabilis, quam conabantur adtingere, cognoscentes gestare personam in eius militiam transierunt. itaque totum culmen auctoritatis lumenque rationis in illo uno salutari nomine atque in una eius ecclesia recreando et reformando humano generi constitutum est.

### English translation (Claude)

But the Platonists, who at that time, with the errors of false philosophers barking all round them and having no divine person by whom to command faith, preferred to hide their opinion to be sought out rather than bring it forward to be defiled, began to emerge to bring forward and disclose what Plato had thought when the name of Christ was already spreading, while earthly kingdoms marveled and were troubled. Then the school of Plotinus flourished at Rome and had as fellow pupils many very acute and skillful men. But some of them were corrupted by curiosity about the magical arts; others, recognizing that the Lord Jesus Christ bore the person of that very truth and unchangeable wisdom which they were trying to reach, passed over into his service. And so the whole summit of authority and the light of reason for re-creating and reforming the human race have been placed in that one saving name and in his one church.

### Scripture references

- Acts 4:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.33 (CSEL 34.2:696–697; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-33).

## Letter 118.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-34
- Source: CSEL 34.2:697–698
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by explaining that he has annotated most of Dioscorus's questions on the parchment itself but omitted those on Cicero's rhetorical works.

### Latin text

Haec me tibi diutissime in hac epistula locutum, etsi alia forte tu malles, omnino non paenitet. probabis enim haec magis, quanto magis in ueritate proficies; et tunc probabis consilium meum, quod nunc utilitati studiorum tuorum minus obsecutum putas. quamquam etiam illis ipsis quaestionibus tuis non solum quibusdam in hac epistula sed etiam ceteris paene omnibus in ipsis membranis, in quibus eas misisti, ut potui, breuiter adnotando responderim. in quibus me si parum egisse aut aliud, quam uolebas, egisse arbitraris, non recte cogitas, mi Dioscore, a quo nunc ista quaesieris. Oratoris autem librorumque de Oratore omnes praetermisi. nescio quis enim nugator mihi esse uisus sum, si eas exponendas persequerer. nam de ceteris possem etiam decenter interrogari, si mihi quisquam res ipsas non de libris Ciceronis sed per se ipsas tractandas dissoluendasque proferret; in illis autem res ipsae nunc nostrae professioni minus congruunt. haec autem omnia non facerem, nisi me post aegritudinem, in qua eram, cum homo tuus uenisset, aliquantum ab Hippone remouerem. quibus item diebus perturbatione ualitudinis febribusque repetitus sum. inde factum est, ut tardius, quam possent, tibi haec mitterentur. quae quo modo acceperis, rescripta flagito.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not at all regret having spoken to you at such length about these things in this letter, even if you would perhaps have preferred other things. For you will approve of them the more, the more you advance in the truth; and then you will approve my counsel, which you now think pays too little regard to the usefulness of your studies. And yet I have also answered those questions of yours, not only some in this letter but also almost all the rest, by brief notes, as best I could, on the very parchments on which you sent them. If you think I have done too little in them, or done something other than you wished, you are not thinking rightly, my Dioscorus, about whom you have asked these things of. But I have passed over all the questions on the Orator and the books On the Orator. For I would have seemed to myself a kind of trifler if I had gone on to expound them. On the other matters I could fittingly be questioned, if anyone put the matters themselves before me, not out of Cicero's books, but to be treated and resolved on their own terms; but in those books the subjects themselves are now ill suited to our profession. And I would not have done even all this had I not, after the illness I was suffering when your man came, withdrawn some distance from Hippo. In those same days I was again attacked by a disturbance of health and by fevers. Hence it came about that these things were sent to you later than they could have been. I insist that you write back and tell me how you have received them.

### Translation notes

- The Orator and On the Orator are Cicero's works on rhetoric.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 118.34 (CSEL 34.2:697–698; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/118-16/#p-118-34).

## Letter 119.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:698–699
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius writes to Augustine that divine truth must be grasped by faith rather than reason, as the errors of the Arians and Macedonians show.

### Latin text

Iam quidem sancto mihique cunctis animi uirtutibus admirando fratri tuo Alypio episcopo genus petitionis meae breui sermone suggesseram sperans, precum mearum ut apud te esse adiutor dignaretur. sed quia praesentiam mihi tuam ea, quae ad uillam ire compulit, causa fraudauit, malui litteris precem inserere quam expectationem animi fluctuare, maxime cum id, quod postulo, si mihi concedi oportere perspexeris. adiuuare sensum tuum altissima mysteria perscrutantem loci ipsius, ut arbitror, in quo nunc consistis, ualeat solitudo. ego igitur cum apud memet ipsum prorsus definierim ueritatem rei diuinae ex fide magis quam ex ratione percipi oportere — si enim fides sanctae ecclesiae ex disputationis ratione, non ex credulitatis pietate adprehenderetur, nemo praeter philosophos atque oratores beatitudinem possideret. sed quia placuit deo, qui infirma huius mundi elegit, ut confundat fortia, per stultitiam praedicationis saluare credentes, non tam ratio requirenda de deo quam auctoritas est sequenda sanctorum. nam profecto neque Arriani, qui filium, quem genitum confitemur, iuniorem putant, in hac impietate persisterent neque Macedoniani spiritum sanctum, quem neque genitum neque ingenitum credimus, quantum in ipsis est, a diuinitatis arce detruderent, si scripturis sanctis magis quam suis ratiocinationibus accommodare fidem mallent —

### English translation (Claude)

I had already, in a few words, suggested the nature of my request to your brother, the holy bishop Alypius, whom I admire for all the virtues of the soul, hoping that he would deign to support my petition with you. But since the business that compelled you to go to the country estate deprived me of your presence, I preferred to put my request into a letter rather than leave my mind wavering in expectation; especially since, if you see that what I ask ought to be granted, the very solitude of the place where I think you now are may help your mind as it searches out the deepest mysteries. I had decided within myself once and for all that the truth about divine things ought to be grasped from faith rather than from reason. For if the faith of the holy church were grasped by the reasoning of disputation and not by the piety of believing, no one but philosophers and orators would possess blessedness. But since it pleased God, who chose the weak things of this world to confound the strong, to save believers through the foolishness of preaching, it is not so much reason that must be sought concerning God as the authority of the saints that must be followed. For certainly neither would the Arians, who think the Son, whom we confess to be begotten, to be younger, persist in this impiety, nor would the Macedonians, as far as in them lies, thrust down from the citadel of divinity the Holy Spirit, whom we believe to be neither begotten nor unbegotten, if they preferred to give their faith to the Holy Scriptures rather than to their own reasonings;

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Consentius, a Catholic layman and writer living in the Balearic Islands. The sentence continues in 119.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.1 (CSEL 34.2:698–699; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-1).

## Letter 119.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:699–700
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius asks Augustine to explain to him, as far as possible, the ineffable divine substance and to correct his errors and his books.

### Latin text

tamen tu, uir admirabilis, si tibi ille pater noster solus conscius secretorum, qui habet clauem Dauid, serenissimo cordis obtutu caelorum machinam penetrare concessit et reuelata, ut scriptum est, facie gloriam domini speculari, in quantum tibi ille, qui huius modi cogitationem dedit, promendi dederit facultatem, enuntia nobis aliquam ineffabilis substantiae portionem et imaginem similitudinis eius ipso adiuuante exprimere, in quantum potes, uerbis enitere, quoniam, nisi tu tantae rei dux ac magister adfueris, uelut lippientibus oculis prospicere in eam tanti luminis repercussa fulgore cogitatio nostra formidat. intra ergo in illam, quae nostros arcet intuitus, mysteriorum dei obscurissimam nubem et quaestiunculas, in quibus absoluendis me errasse cognosco, qui auctoritatem sanctitatis tuae fide magis sequi uolo quam rationis corde conceptae falsa imagine deprauari, primum in memet ipso, dehinc in libris corrige.

### English translation (Claude)

yet you, admirable man, if that Father of ours who alone knows secrets, who has the key of David, has granted you to penetrate the fabric of the heavens with the most serene gaze of the heart and, as it is written, to behold the glory of the Lord with unveiled face, declare to us, as far as he who gave you this kind of thought has given you the ability to express it, some portion of the ineffable substance, and strive with his help to express in words, as far as you can, the image of its likeness; for unless you are present as guide and master in so great a matter, our thought, as if with bleary eyes, is afraid to look upon it, beaten back by the flash of so great a light. Enter, then, into that most obscure cloud of the mysteries of God which keeps off our gaze, and correct the little questions in which I recognize that I erred in answering them, I who wish rather to follow the authority of Your Holiness by faith than to be corrupted by the false image of a reason conceived in the heart: correct them first in myself, then in my books.

### Scripture references

- Rev 3:7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:18: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.2 (CSEL 34.2:699–700; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-2).

## Letter 119.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:700
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius explains that he had thought of God as an infinite light with form and beauty, and reports an objection to his book about the risen Christ's body.

### Latin text

Ego si quidem in circumspecta admodum simplicitate audiens credensque dominum Iesum lumen esse de lumine, sicut scriptum est: Bene nuntiate diem de die salutare eius et in Sapientia Salomonis: Candor est enim lucis aeternae, credebam deum, quod licet credere, ut dignum est, non ualebam, tamen esse inaestimabilis cuiusdam lucis infinitam magnitudinem, cuius nec qualitatem aestimare nec quantitatem metiri nec speciem fingere quamquam sublime cogitans mens humana sufficeret, tamen esse illud quiddam, quicquid est, cui adsit incomparabilis forma, adsit inaestimabilis pulchritudo, quam etiam carnalibus oculis saltem Christus aspiciat, cum ergo circa finem primi libri, sicut procul dubio meminisse dignaris, cupiens comprobare dominum Iesum Christum, id est hominem adsumptum ita diuinam potentiam possidere, ut materia carnis humanae, quam susceperat. permaneret, - cum in illis uisceribus nihil aliud quam infirmitatem perisse docuissem, illius mihi nodus quaestionis obiectus est: Si inquit, homo ille, quem adsumpsit Christus, in deum uersus est, ergo localis esse non debuit; cur ergo post resurrectionem dixit: Noli me tangere; nondum enim ascendi ad patrem meum?

### English translation (Claude)

For I, hearing and believing with a very cautious simplicity that the Lord Jesus is light from light, as it is written, “Proclaim well his salvation, day from day,” and in the Wisdom of Solomon, “For she is the brightness of eternal light,” believed (as far as one may believe, though I could not do so worthily) that God is the infinite greatness of a certain inestimable light, whose quality the human mind could not estimate, nor measure its quantity, nor picture its appearance, however loftily it thought; but that it is nevertheless something, whatever it is, to which belongs an incomparable form and an inestimable beauty, which at least Christ beholds even with fleshly eyes. Then, near the end of my first book, as you surely deign to remember, I wished to prove that the Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the man assumed, possesses divine power in such a way that the matter of the human flesh he had taken up remains; and when I had taught that in that inward being nothing but weakness had perished, the knot of this question was put to me: “If,” he says, “that man whom Christ assumed was changed into God, then he ought not to have been in a place; why then did he say after the resurrection, ‘Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father’?”

### Scripture references

- Ps 96:2 (95:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 20:17: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:26 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Day from day” is the Old Latin of Ps 96:2 (LXX 95:2), here read as a figure of “light from light”. The views on Christ's humanity being “changed into God” are Consentius's own and are corrected by Augustine in Ep. 120.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.3 (CSEL 34.2:700; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-3).

## Letter 119.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:700–702
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius quotes the passage of his book on the unity of God and the three persons, by which he argued that Christ is everywhere by divinity, not by body.

### Latin text

Ego igitur elaborans adprobare ubique esse Christum uirtute non corpore, diuinitate non carne de unitate dei et personarum trinitate huiusce modi uerba conscripsi: Deus, inquam, unus est, personae tres sunt. deus indiscretus est, personae discretae sunt. deus intra omnia, trans omnia est, ultima includit, media implet, summa transcendit, ultra uniuersa et per uniuersa diffunditur; personae autem sibi constantes proprietate secernuntur, non confusione miscentur. deus ergo unus est et ubique est, quia et alius praeter illum non est et locus non est uacuus, ubi esse alius possit. plena sunt deo omnia et praeter deum nihil est. ipse est in patre, ipse in filio, ipse in spiritu sancto ac per hoc pater et filius et spiritus sanctus non plures dei, sed ipse unus deus est; et non est ipse pater, qui est filius, nec filius, qui spiritus sanctus. pater in filio est, filius in patre, in utroque spiritus sanctus, quia in tribus numero non ordine, id est personis non uirtute discretis unus atque indiuisibilis habitat deus. omnia, quae patris sunt, filii sunt et, quae filii sunt, patris sunt et, quae utriusque sunt, spiritus sancti sunt, quia non quasi aequalem sed eandem, id est unitam non separatam possident substantiam deitatis; et ideo uel maiestate uel aetate alter alterum non praecedit, quia diuidi, quod plenum est, non potest nec est in plenitudine aliquid, quod possit plenitudinem separare et maiorem uni minorem alteri facere portionem. in personis autem non ita est, quia patris persona non est filii nec filii persona eadem est spiritus sancti. una uirtus est, quam trina possidet uirtus, una substantia est, in qua tria sunt, quae subsistunt. pater ergo et filius et spiritus sanctus maiestate ubique sunt, quia unum sunt, personis tantum apud se sunt, quia tres sunt et reliqua huius modi texens rem eo usque deduxi, ut praesentes quidem et ubique esse personas sed illa, quae supra caelos trans maria ultra inferos una atque eadem est, maiestate firmarem. ex quo intellegi debere monstrabam hominem, quem Christus adsumpsit, in deum quidem uersum susceptam non amisisse naturam, non tamen quasi quartam credi posse personam.

### English translation (Claude)

So, laboring to prove that Christ is everywhere by power, not by body, by divinity, not by flesh, I wrote words of this kind about the unity of God and the trinity of persons: “God,” I said, “is one; the persons are three. God is undivided; the persons are distinct. God is within all things and beyond all things; he encloses the farthest, fills the middle, transcends the highest; he is spread out beyond all things and through all things. But the persons, consistent in themselves, are distinguished by their properties, not mingled by confusion. God, then, is one and is everywhere, because there is no other besides him and there is no empty place where another could be. All things are full of God, and besides God there is nothing. He himself is in the Father, he himself in the Son, he himself in the Holy Spirit; and therefore the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are not several gods, but he himself is the one God; and the Father is not the one who is the Son, nor is the Son the one who is the Holy Spirit. The Father is in the Son, the Son in the Father, the Holy Spirit in both; because in the three, distinguished in number, not in order, that is, in persons, not in power, the one and indivisible God dwells. All things that are the Father's are the Son's, and those that are the Son's are the Father's, and those that are both's are the Holy Spirit's, because they possess not as it were an equal but the same substance of deity, that is, united, not separated; and therefore neither precedes the other in majesty or age, because what is full cannot be divided, nor is there anything in fullness that could separate fullness and make a greater portion for one and a lesser for another. But in the persons it is not so, because the person of the Father is not that of the Son, nor is the person of the Son the same as that of the Holy Spirit. There is one power, which the threefold power possesses; there is one substance, in which there are three who subsist. The Father, then, and the Son and the Holy Spirit are everywhere by majesty, because they are one; by their persons they are only with one another, because they are three.” Weaving together other things of this kind, I carried the matter to the point of affirming that the persons are present and everywhere, but by the majesty which is one and the same above the heavens, beyond the seas, beneath the underworld. From this I showed that it should be understood that the man whom Christ assumed, though changed into God, did not lose the nature he had taken up, and yet cannot be believed to be a fourth person, as it were.

### Scripture references

- John 14:10: allusion, medium confidence
- John 16:15: allusion, medium confidence
- Jer 23:24: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The Trinitarian formulas are Consentius's own, quoted from his book; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.4 (CSEL 34.2:700–702; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-4).

## Letter 119.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:702–703
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius reports Augustine's teaching that God must be thought of without bodily images, like justice, and objects that justice is not a living being.

### Latin text

Sed tu, uir, cui caelum, ut arbitror, ipsum subtilitate cogitationum intrare concessum est — uerax etenim est, qui ait: Beati mundo corde, quia ipsi deum uidebunt super omnia sidera ad ipsam contemplationem altitudinem mundi cordis adtollens ais non tamquam aliquod corpus debere cogitari deum; nam etiam si quispiam animo lucem milies, quam huius solis est, clariorem maioremque confingat, nullam illic dei similitudinem comprehendi posse, quia corpus est omne, quod cerni potest; sed sicut iustitiam uel pietatem corpoream cogitare non possumus, nisi forte aliqua nobis feminea corpora gentili uanitate fingamus, ita et deum sine aliqua phantasiae simulatione, in quantum possumus, cogitandum. mihi autem, qui subtilitatem disputationis tuae percipere admodum corde uix possum, uidebatur nihil uiuum secundum substantiam inesse iustitiae ideoque non possum adhuc deum, id est uiuentem naturam iustitiae similem cogitare, quia iustitia non in se sed in nobis uiuit, immo potius nos secundum iustitiam uiuimus, ipsa uero per se iustitia nequaquam uiuit, nisi forte non huius humanae aequitatis sed illa, quae deus est, sola adseratur esse iustitia.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, a man to whom it has been granted, I think, to enter heaven itself by the subtlety of your thoughts (for he is truthful who says, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God”), lifting the height of a pure heart above all the stars to contemplation itself, say that God ought not to be thought of as some body; for even if someone were to picture in his mind a light a thousand times brighter and greater than that of this sun, no likeness of God could be grasped there, because everything that can be seen is body; but just as we cannot think of justice or piety as bodily, unless perhaps we imagine to ourselves some female figures, with pagan vanity, so God too is to be thought of, as far as we can, without any imagery of fantasy. But to me, who can scarcely grasp in my heart the subtlety of your argument, it seemed that there is nothing living in justice as regards substance; and so I cannot yet think of God, that is, a living nature, as like justice, because justice lives not in itself but in us; or rather, we live according to justice, but justice itself does not live at all by itself; unless perhaps it is asserted that not this human equity but only that justice which is God is justice.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Female figures”: pagan personifications of virtues as goddesses.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.5 (CSEL 34.2:702–703; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-5).

## Letter 119.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:703–704
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Consentius asks Augustine to correct his error openly and fully, for the sake of many in the islands who share it, as he had invited him to do in the preface to his books.

### Latin text

Unde confirmari me ex omnibus non solum praesentibus uerbis sed etiam pleniori epistula uelim. neque enim fas est, ut nostri tantum pedes ab ista, in qua multi ingredimur, erroris uia te monente reuocentur. cum enim multi in illis, in quibus habitamus, insulis dum recto ad uiam pergunt aggere, in tramitem tortuosi huius erroris incurrerint, eritne aliquis illic Augustinus, cuius auctoritati cedant, cuius doctrinae credant, cuius ingenio superentur? an forte ex illo paternitatis affectu mauis me occulta admonitione dirigere quam uelut comitem praui itineris increpare? sed mihi pro utilitate animae magis quam pro saeculi laude currere cupienti non est inutilis ac perinde etiam non amara coargutio tua, maxime cum et mihi et ceteris uitam simul laudemque paritura sit, nemo si quidem tam iniustus esse arbiter potest, qui me ex eo, quod aliquando deuia sum secutus, stultitiae denotare malit, quam ex eo, quod recta delegerim, prudenter iudicare cunctetur. neque enim stulti aestimandi sunt, quos Paulus apostolus, ne in incertum currerent, admonebat dicens: Sic currite, ut adprehendatis. quapropter uia ista, quam currimus, non solum relinquenda nobis uerum etiam intercludenda atque praecidenda tibi est, ne forte etiam eos fallaci dilectionis simulatione frustretur. tu enim non editorum iam a me librorum lector sed probandorum emendator, ni fallor, electus es. nam in illa epistula, quam in illis libellis meis uelut praefatiunculam praetuli, huius modi uerba conscripta sunt: Placuit, inquam, fluctuantem fidei nostrae cymbam beati Augustini episcopi stabilire sententia. cur ergo, uir doctrinae huius, quae in Christo est, culmen, arguere palam corrigendum de cetero filium dubitas, cum sententiae tuae ancora, nisi morsum altius presserit, nos certius stabilire non possit? non enim leuis aut culpa aut quaestio est, in qua non solum nihil profecit, uerum etiam, sicut a te fortissime dictum est, quasi cuiusdam idolatriae crimen caecitas nostrae cogitationis incurrit. hanc a te caute prudenterque discuti uellem, ut doctrinae tuae ingeniique serenitas ita nebulam nostrae mentis abstergat, ut, quod nunc cogitare non possumus, intellegentiae a te lumine declaratum oculis cordis uidere ualeamus. incolumis ac beatus nostrique in aeternum memor caelestia regna possideas, domine sancte ac beatissime papa.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence I would like to be confirmed on all these matters, not only by the present words but also by a fuller letter. For it is not right that only our feet should be called back by your warning from this road of error on which many of us walk. For since many in the islands where we live, while proceeding along the straight embankment toward the highway, have run into the side-track of this crooked error, will there be any Augustine there to whose authority they will yield, whose teaching they will believe, by whose intellect they will be overcome? Or perhaps out of fatherly affection you prefer to direct me by a private admonition rather than rebuke me as a companion on a wrong road? But to me, who desire to run for the benefit of my soul rather than for the praise of the world, your reproof is not useless, and for the same reason not bitter either, especially since it will bring both life and praise to me and to others; for no one can be so unjust a judge as to prefer to brand me with folly because I once followed by-ways, rather than to hesitate to judge me prudent because I chose the right ones. For those whom the apostle Paul warned not to run uncertainly are not to be thought fools; he said, “So run that you may obtain.” Wherefore this road on which we are running must not only be abandoned by us but also be blocked off and cut off by you, lest perhaps it should deceive others too by a false pretense of love. For you have been chosen, unless I am mistaken, not as a reader of books already published by me but as a corrector of books still to be approved. For in the letter which I placed as a little preface before those little books of mine, words of this kind were written: “It has pleased me,” I said, “to steady the wavering skiff of our faith by the judgment of the blessed bishop Augustine.” Why then, you who are the summit of this teaching which is in Christ, do you hesitate to rebuke openly a son who is to be corrected henceforth, when the anchor of your judgment cannot steady us more surely unless it bites more deeply? For it is no light fault or question, in which the blindness of our thinking not only made no progress, but even, as you said most forcefully, incurred the charge of something like idolatry. I would like this to be examined by you cautiously and prudently, so that the serenity of your teaching and intellect may so wipe away the mist of our mind that what we cannot now think we may be able to see with the eyes of the heart, made clear by you with the light of understanding. May you, safe and blessed and mindful of us forever, possess the heavenly kingdoms, holy lord and most blessed father.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:24: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:26: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Father” renders papa, an honorific used for bishops.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 119.6 (CSEL 34.2:703–704; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-119-6).

## Letter 120.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:704–705
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Consentius, urging him to come and read his works with him and to mark the passages that trouble him.

### Latin text

Ego propterea, ut ad nos uenires, rogaui, quoniam in libris tuis ualde sum tuo delectatus ingenio. proinde uolui, ut quaedam nostra opuscula, quae arbitratus sum tibi esse necessaria, non procul a nobis positus sed potius apud nos legeres, ut ea, quae forte minus intellexisses, non difficulter praesens interrogares atque ex nostra sermocinatione mutuoque conloquio, quantum dominus et nobis promere et tibi capere tribuisset, quid in libris tuis emendandum esset, ipse cognosceres, ipse emendares. eius quippe es facultatis, ut possis, quae senseris, explicare, eius porro probitatis et humilitatis, ut merearis uera sentire. et nunc in eadem sum, quae nec tibi debet displicere, sententia, unde te nuper admonui, ut in his, quae a nobis elaborata apud te legis, signa facias ad ea loca, quae te mouent, et cum his ad me uenias et de singulis quaeras. nondum quae fecisti, exhortor, ut facias. recte quippe uerecundareris ac te pigeret id agere, si uel semel uoluisses et me difficilem repperisses. illud quoque dixeram, cum a te audissem, quod mendosissimis fatigareris codicibus, ut in nostris legeres, quos emendatiores posses ceteris inuenire.

### English translation (Claude)

I asked you to come to us for this reason, that I was greatly delighted with your intellect in your books. And so I wanted you to read certain works of ours, which I thought necessary for you, not at a distance from us but rather here with us, so that whatever you might have understood less well you could ask about in person without difficulty, and from our conversation and talk together, as far as the Lord should grant us to bring forth and you to grasp, you yourself might learn what needed correcting in your books, and correct it yourself. For you have such ability that you can explain what you think, and such uprightness and humility that you deserve to think what is true. And I am still of the same opinion, which ought not to displease you either; hence I recently advised you, in the works of ours that you are reading at home, to put marks at the places that trouble you, and to come to me with them and ask about each. What you have not yet done I exhort you to do. For you would rightly be ashamed and reluctant to do this if you had ever once wished to and had found me difficult. I had also told you, when I heard from you that you were struggling with very faulty manuscripts, to read them in ours, which you might find more correct than others.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.1 (CSEL 34.2:704–705; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-1).

## Letter 120.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:705–706
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points out that Consentius's request for an explanation of the Trinity contradicts his own claim that reason should not be sought, and asks him to correct it.

### Latin text

Quod autem petis, ut quaestionem trinitatis, hoc est de unitate diuinitatis et discretione personarum caute prudenterque discutiam, ut doctrinae meae, sicut dicis, ingeniique serenitas ita nebulam uestrae mentis abstergat, ut, quod nunc cogitare non potestis, intellegentiae a me lumine declaratum oculis quodam modo uidere possitis, uide prius, utrum ista petitio cum tua superiore definitione concordet. superius quippe in eadem ipsa epistula, in qua hoc petis, apud temet ipsum definisse te dicis ueritatem ex fide magis quam ex ratione percipi oportere; si enim fides>, inquis, sanctae ecclesiae ex disputationis ratione et non ex credulitatis pietate adprehenderetur, nemo praeter philosophos atque oratores beatitudinem possideret. sed quia placuit deo, inquis, qui infirma huius mundi elegit, ut confunderet fortia, per stultitiam praedicationis saluos facere credentes, non tam ratio requirenda quam auctoritas est sequenda sanctorum. uide ergo, secundum haec uerba tua ne potius debeas maxime de hac re, in qua praecipue fides nostra consistit, solam sanctorum auctoritatem sequi nec eius intellegentiae a me quaerere rationem. neque enim cum coepero te in tanti huius secreti intellegentiam utcumque introducere, quod, nisi deus intus adiuuerit, omnino non potero, aliud disserendo facturus sum quam rationem, ut potero, redditurus. quam si a me uel a quolibet doctore non inrationabiliter flagitas, ut, quod credis, intellegas, corrige definitionem tuam, non ut fidem respuas, sed ut ea, quae fidei firmitate iam tenes, etiam rationis luce conspicias.

### English translation (Claude)

As for your request that I examine the question of the Trinity, that is, of the unity of the divinity and the distinction of the persons, cautiously and prudently, so that the serenity of my teaching and intellect, as you say, may so wipe away the mist of your mind that what you cannot now think you may in some way be able to see with your eyes, made clear by me with the light of understanding: see first whether this request agrees with your earlier definition. For earlier, in the very letter in which you make this request, you say that you had decided within yourself “that truth ought to be grasped from faith rather than from reason; for if the faith of the holy church,” you say, “were grasped by the reasoning of disputation and not by the piety of believing, no one but philosophers and orators would possess blessedness. But since it pleased God,” you say, “who chose the weak things of this world to confound the strong, to save believers through the foolishness of preaching, it is not so much reason that must be sought as the authority of the saints that must be followed.” See, then, whether according to these words of yours you ought not rather, especially in this matter in which our faith chiefly consists, to follow the authority of the saints alone and not seek from me the reason for understanding it. For when I begin to lead you in some way into the understanding of so great a mystery, which I shall not be able to do at all unless God helps within, I shall be doing nothing else in my discussion than giving a reason, as far as I can. If you demand this, not unreasonably, from me or from any teacher, so that you may understand what you believe, correct your definition: not so as to reject faith, but so as to see by the light of reason as well what you already hold by the firmness of faith.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:21: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.2 (CSEL 34.2:705–706; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-2).

## Letter 120.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:706–707
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that faith precedes the reason that cannot yet be grasped, yet a small reason, which persuades us to believe, precedes faith.

### Latin text

Absit namque, ut hoc in nobis deus oderit, in quo nos reliquis animantibus excellentiores creauit. absit, inquam, ut ideo credamus, ne rationem accipiamus siue quaeramus, cum etiam credere non possemus, nisi rationales animas haberemus. ut ergo in quibusdam rebus ad doctrinam salutarem pertinentibus, quas ratione percipere nondum ualemus sed aliquando ualebimus, fides praecedat rationem, qua cor mundetur, ut magnae rationis capiat et perferat lucem, et hoc utique rationis est. et ideo rationabiliter dictum est per prophetam: Nisi credideritis, non intellegetis. ubi procul dubio discreuit haec duo deditque consilium, quo prius credamus, ut id, quod credimus, intellegere ualeamus. proinde ut fides praecedat rationem, rationabiliter iussum est. nam si hoc praeceptum rationabile non est, ergo inrationabile est; absit. si igitur rationabile est, ut magnam quandam, quae capi nondum potest, fides antecedat rationem, procul dubio quantulacumque ratio, quae hoc persuadet, etiam ipsa antecedit fidem.

### English translation (Claude)

For far be it from God to hate in us that by which he created us more excellent than the other animals. Far be it, I say, that we should believe in order not to receive or seek reason, since we could not even believe if we did not have rational souls. So, in certain matters pertaining to saving doctrine which we cannot yet perceive by reason, but one day shall, faith precedes reason, so that by it the heart may be cleansed to receive and bear the light of great reason; and this is certainly a demand of reason. And therefore it was reasonably said through the prophet, “Unless you believe, you will not understand.” There, without doubt, he distinguished these two and gave counsel that we first believe, so that we may be able to understand what we believe. Accordingly, it is reasonably commanded that faith precede reason. For if this precept is not reasonable, then it is unreasonable; far from it! If, then, it is reasonable that faith should precede a certain great reason which cannot yet be grasped, without doubt the reason, however small, which persuades us of this itself also precedes faith.

### Scripture references

- Isa 7:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 7:9 in its Greek (LXX) form.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.3 (CSEL 34.2:706–707; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-3).

## Letter 120.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:707–708
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that reason must be given to believers according to their capacity, while they keep to the way of faith, which alone leads to the vision of God.

### Latin text

Propterea monet apostolus paratos nos esse debere ad responsionem omni poscenti nos rationem de fide et spe nostra, quoniam, si a me infidelis rationem poscit fidei et spei meae et uideo, quod ante, quam credat, capere non potest, hanc ipsam ei reddo rationem, in qua, si fieri potest, uideat, quam praepostere ante fidem poscat rationem earum rerum, quas capere non potest; si autem iam fidelis rationem poscat, ut, quod credit, intellegat, capacitas eius intuenda est, ut secundum eam ratione reddita sumat fidei suae, quantam potest, intellegentiam, maiorem, si plus capit, minorem, si minus, dum tamen, quousque ad plenitudinem cognitionis perfectionemque perueniat, ab itinere fidei non recedat. hinc est, quod dicit apostolus: Et si quid aliter sapitis, id quoque uobis deus reuelabit; uerum tamen in quod peruenimus, in eo ambulemus. iam ergo si fideles sumus, ad fidei uiam perueniemus, quam si non dimiserimus, non solum ad tantam intellegentiam rerum incorporearum et incommutabilium, quanta in hac uita capi non ab omnibus potest, uerum etiam ad summitatem contemplationis, quam dicit apostolus facie ad faciem, sine dubitatione ueniemus. nam quidam etiam minimum et tamen in uia fidei perseuerantissime gradientes ad illam beatissimam contemplationem perueniunt, quidam uero, quid sit natura inuisibilis, incommutabilis, incorporea, utcumque iam scientes et uiam, quae ducit ad tantam beatitudinis mansionem, quoniam stulta illis uidetur, quod est Christus crucifixus, tenere recusantes ad quietis ipsius penetrale, cuius iam luce mens eorum uelut in longinqua radiante perstringitur, peruenire non possunt

### English translation (Claude)

This is why the apostle warns that we ought to be ready to give an answer to everyone who asks us a reason for our faith and hope. For if an unbeliever asks me a reason for my faith and hope, and I see that he cannot grasp it before he believes, I give him this very reason, in which he may see, if possible, how preposterously he asks, before having faith, for a reason for things he cannot grasp; but if a believer asks for a reason so that he may understand what he believes, his capacity must be considered, so that, when a reason is given according to it, he may take as much understanding of his faith as he can, greater if he grasps more, less if he grasps less, provided only that he does not withdraw from the road of faith until he reaches the fullness and perfection of knowledge. Hence the apostle says: “And if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you; nevertheless, where we have arrived, there let us walk.” If, then, we are already believers, we have arrived at the way of faith; and if we do not abandon it, we shall without doubt come not only to such understanding of incorporeal and unchangeable things as cannot be grasped by all in this life, but even to the summit of contemplation, which the apostle calls “face to face.” For some, even the least, but walking most perseveringly on the road of faith, arrive at that most blessed contemplation; while others, already knowing in some fashion what an invisible, unchangeable, incorporeal nature is, but refusing to hold to the way that leads to so great a dwelling of blessedness, because it seems foolish to them, that is, Christ crucified, cannot reach the inner sanctuary of that rest, by whose light, as though shining from afar, their mind is already dazzled.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The text prints the future “perueniemus” (“we shall arrive”) in “we have arrived at the way of faith”; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.4 (CSEL 34.2:707–708; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-4).

## Letter 120.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:708
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that some truths become credible once reasoned out, while God sometimes hides the reason of his miracles so that they may still rouse wonder and faith.

### Latin text

Sunt autem quaedam, quae cum audierimus, non eis accommodamus fidem et ratione nobis reddita uera esse cognoscimus, quae credere non ualemus. et uniuersa dei miracula ideo ab infidelibus non creduntur, quia eorum ratio non uidetur. et re uera sunt, de quibus ratio reddi non potest, non tamen non est; quid enim est in rerum natura, quod inrationabiliter fecerit deus? sed quorundam mirabilium operum eius etiam expedit tantisper occultam esse rationem, ne apud animos fastidio languidos eiusdem rationis cognitione uilescant. sunt enim et hi multi sunt, qui plus tenentur admiratione rerum quam cognitione causarum, ubi miracula mira esse desistunt, et opus est eos ad inuisibilium fidem uisibilibus mirabilibus excitari, ut puritate purgati eo perueniant, ubi familiaritate ueritatis mirari desinant. nam et in theatris homines funiambulum mirantur, musicis delectantur; in illo stupetur difficultas, in his retinet pascitque iucunditas.

### English translation (Claude)

There are some things which, when we hear them, we do not believe, and which, once a reason is given us, we recognize to be true, though we could not believe them. And all the miracles of God are not believed by unbelievers precisely because their reason is not seen. And in truth there are things for which a reason cannot be given, and yet it is not that there is none; for what is there in the nature of things that God made without reason? But in the case of some of his wonderful works it is even expedient that their reason be hidden for a while, lest they become cheap, through knowledge of that reason, in minds languid with disdain. For there are those, and they are many, who are held more by wonder at things than by knowledge of causes, whereupon miracles cease to be wonderful; and they need to be roused to faith in invisible things by visible wonders, so that, cleansed by purity, they may come to the point where, through familiarity with the truth, they cease to wonder. For in the theaters too men marvel at the rope-walker and are delighted by musicians; in the one the difficulty astonishes them, in the others the pleasure holds and feeds them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.5 (CSEL 34.2:708; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-5).

## Letter 120.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:708–710
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes true reason from the false reasoning of the Arians and Macedonians, and notes that philosophers who accepted Christ crucified found the fishermen ahead of them.

### Latin text

Haec dixerim, ut fidem tuam ad amorem intellegentiae cohortarer, ad quam ratio uera perducit et cui fides animum praeparat. nam illa, quae persuasit in ea trinitate, quae est deus, filium patri non esse coaeternum uel alterius esse substantiae atque aliqua parte dissimilem et eo modo inferiorem spiritum sanctum, itemque illa, quae persuasit patrem et filium unius eiusdemque, spiritum uero sanctum alterius esse substantiae, non ideo, quia ratio est, sed quia falsa ratio est, cauenda et detestanda dicenda est. si autem ratio uera esset, non utique errasset. quapropter sicut non ideo debes omnem uitare sermonem, quia est et sermo falsus, ita non debes omnem uitare rationem, quia est et falsa ratio. hoc et de sapientia dixerim; neque enim propterea sapientia deuitanda est, quia est et falsa sapientia, cui stultitia est Christus crucifixus, qui est dei uirtus et dei sapientia, et ideo per hanc stultitiam praedicationis placuit deo saluos facere credentes, quoniam, quod stultum est dei, sapientius est hominibus. hoc quibusdam philosophorum et oratorum non ueram uiam sed ueri similem sectantibus et in ea se ipsos aliosque fallentibus persuaderi non potuit, quibusdam uero eorum potuit. et quibus potuit, neque scandalum est Christus crucifixus neque stultitia; in his enim sunt, quibus uocatis Iudaeis et Graecis dei uirtus est et dei sapientia. in qua uia, id est in cuius Christi crucifixi fide, qui eius rectitudinem per dei gratiam comprehendere potuerunt, et si philosophi appellati sunt siue oratores, profecto humili pietate confessi sunt sibi longe excellentius in ea fuisse praeuios piscatores non solum credendi firmissimo robore uerum etiam intellegendi certissima ueritate. cum enim didicissent ad hoc electa esse stulta mundi et infirma, ut sapientia confunderentur et fortia, seque cognouissent fallaciter sapere et inbecilliter praeualere, confusi salubriter facti sunt stulti et infirmi, ut per stultum et infirmum dei, quod sapientius et fortius est hominibus, inter electa stulta et infirma fierent ueraciter sapientes et efficaciter fortes.

### English translation (Claude)

I would say these things to exhort your faith to the love of understanding, to which true reason leads and for which faith prepares the mind. For the reasoning that persuaded some that in the Trinity which is God the Son is not coeternal with the Father, or is of another substance and unlike him in some respect, and the Holy Spirit inferior in the same way; and likewise the reasoning that persuaded others that the Father and the Son are of one and the same substance but the Holy Spirit of another: these must be called things to be avoided and detested, not because they are reason, but because they are false reason. If the reason were true, it certainly would not have erred. Therefore, just as you ought not to avoid all speech because there is also false speech, so you ought not to avoid all reason because there is also false reason. I would say the same of wisdom; for wisdom is not to be avoided because there is also a false wisdom, to which Christ crucified is foolishness, who is the power of God and the wisdom of God; and therefore it pleased God through this foolishness of preaching to save believers, because the foolishness of God is wiser than men. Some of the philosophers and orators, following not the true way but one like the truth, and deceiving themselves and others in it, could not be persuaded of this; but some of them could. And to those who could, Christ crucified is neither a stumbling block nor foolishness; for they are among those to whom, being called, both Jews and Greeks, he is the power of God and the wisdom of God. In this way, that is, in the faith of this Christ crucified, those who could grasp its rightness by the grace of God, even if they were called philosophers or orators, certainly confessed with humble piety that fishermen had gone before them in it far more excellently, not only in the firmest strength of believing but also in the most certain truth of understanding. For when they had learned that the foolish and weak things of the world were chosen to confound the wise and the strong, and had recognized that their own wisdom was deceitful and their strength feeble, they were wholesomely confounded and became foolish and weak, so that through the foolishness and weakness of God, which is wiser and stronger than men, they might become, among the chosen foolish and weak, truly wise and effectively strong.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The two errors described are those of the Arians and of the Macedonians (Pneumatomachians).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.6 (CSEL 34.2:708–710; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-6).

## Letter 120.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:710–711
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects as a kind of idolatry the picture of the Trinity as three bodily masses in heaven sharing a fourth, omnipresent divinity.

### Latin text

Cui autem nisi uerissimae rationi fidelis pietas erubescit. ut quandam idolatriam, quam in corde nostro ex consuetudine uisibilium constituere conatur humanae cogitationis infirmitas, non dubitemus euertere nec audeamus credere ita esse trinitatem, quam inuisibilem et incorpoream atque incommutabilem colimus, quasi tres quasdam uiuentes moles licet maximas et pulcherrimas suorum tamen locorum spatiis propriis terminatas et sibimet in suis locis contigua propinquitate cohaerentes, siue una earum sic in medio constituta, ut duas dirimat sibi ex lateribus singulis iunctas, siue in modum trigoni duas ceteras unaquaeque contingat, ut nulla ab aliqua separetur; earumque trium tantarum ac talium personarum licet in grandi ualde molibus tamen a summo et imo et circumquaque terminatarum unam esse diuinitatem aliquid quartum nec talem, qualis est aliqua ex illis, sed communem omnibus tamquam numen omnium et in omnibus et in singulis totum, per quam unam diuinitatem dicatur eadem trinitas unus deus: eiusque tres personas nusquam esse nisi in caelis, illam uero diuinitatem nusquam non esse sed ubique praesentem; ac per hoc recte quidem dici deum et in caelo esse et in terra propter illam diuinitatem, quae ubique sit tribusque communis sit, non autem recte dici patrem esse in terra uel filium uel spiritum sanctum, cum huic trinitati sedes non nisi in caelo sit? istam cogitationis carnalis compositionem uanumque figmentum ubi uera ratio labefactare incipit, continuo intus illo adiuuante atque inluminante, qui cum talibus idolis in corde nostro habitare non uult, ita ista confringere atque a fide nostra quodam modo excutere festinamus, ut ne puluerem quidem ullum talium phantasmatum illic remanere patiamur.

### English translation (Claude)

But to what does faithful piety defer with reverence, if not to the truest reason, so that we do not hesitate to overturn a kind of idolatry which the weakness of human thought, out of habit with visible things, tries to set up in our heart, nor dare to believe that the Trinity, which we worship as invisible, incorporeal, and unchangeable, is like three living masses, however great and beautiful, yet bounded by the proper extents of their own places and joined to one another in their places by touching closely; whether one of them is placed in the middle so as to separate the two joined to it on either side, or each touches the other two in the manner of a triangle, so that none is separated from any other; and that of these three persons, so great and of such a kind, though in very great masses, yet bounded above and below and all round, there is one divinity, a fourth something, not such as any of them is, but common to all, as the godhead of all, whole in all and in each, through which one divinity the same Trinity is said to be one God; and that its three persons are nowhere but in the heavens, whereas that divinity is nowhere absent but present everywhere; and that therefore it is rightly said that God is both in heaven and on earth because of that divinity which is everywhere and common to the three, but not rightly said that the Father is on earth, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit, since this Trinity has its seat nowhere but in heaven? When true reason begins to shake this construction of carnal thought and this empty fiction, at once, with the help and illumination within of him who does not wish to dwell in our heart along with such idols, we hasten so to shatter these things and in a way to shake them out of our faith that we do not allow even the dust of such phantasms to remain there.

### Translation notes

- The picture rejected is the view Consentius had expressed in his book (Ep. 119.4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.7 (CSEL 34.2:710–711; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-7).

## Letter 120.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:711
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that faith prepares for reason, that true faith is better than false reason, and that faith seeks understanding with hope and love.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem nisi rationem disputationis, qua forinsecus admoniti ipsi intrinsecus ueritate lucente haec falsa esse perspicimus, fides in nostro corde antecessisset, quae nos indueret pietate, nonne incassum, quae uera sunt, audiremus? ac per hoc, quoniam id, quod ad eam pertinebat, fides egit, ideo subsequens ratio aliquid eorum, quae inquirebat, inuenit. falsae itaque rationi non solum ratio uera, qua id, quod credimus, intellegimus, uerum etiam fides ipsa rerum nondum intellectarum sine dubio praeferenda est. melius est enim quamuis nondum uisum credere, quod uerum est, quam putare te uerum uidere, quod falsum est. habet namque fides oculos suos, quibus quodam modo uidet uerum esse, quod nondum uidet, et quibus certissime uidet nondum se uidere, quod credit. porro autem qui uera ratione iam, quod tantum modo credebat, intellegit, profecto praeponendus est ei, qui cupit adhuc intellegere, quod credit; si autem nec cupit et ea, quae intellegenda sunt, credenda tantum modo existimat, cui rei fides prosit, ignorat; nam pia fides sine spe et sine caritate esse non uult. sic igitur homo fidelis debet credere, quod nondum uidet, ut uisionem et speret et amet.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, unless faith, which clothed us with piety, had gone before in our heart the reasoning of the discussion by which, admonished from outside, we ourselves perceive within, by the shining of the truth, that these things are false, would we not hear the things that are true in vain? And so, because faith did what belonged to it, the reason that followed found something of what it was seeking. So not only true reason, by which we understand what we believe, but even faith itself in things not yet understood is without doubt to be preferred to false reason. For it is better to believe what is true, though it is not yet seen, than to think that you see as true what is false. For faith has its own eyes, by which it sees in a way that what it does not yet see is true, and by which it sees most certainly that it does not yet see what it believes. Further, one who by true reason now understands what he only believed is surely to be preferred to one who still desires to understand what he believes; but if someone does not even desire it, and thinks that the things that are to be understood are only to be believed, he does not know what faith is good for; for pious faith does not wish to be without hope and love. So, then, the believer ought to believe what he does not yet see in such a way that he both hopes for and loves the vision.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:13: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.8 (CSEL 34.2:711; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-8).

## Letter 120.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:711–712
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes past things, believed only; future things, believed and hoped for; and eternal things, some invisible and seen by understanding, some visible like Christ's risen body.

### Latin text

Et uisibilium quidem rerum praeteritarum, quae temporaliter transierunt, sola fides est, quoniam non adhuc uidenda sperantur, sed facta et transacta creduntur, sicut est illud, quod Christus semel pro peccatis nostris mortuus est et resurrexit nec iam morietur et mors ei ultra non dominabitur. ea uero, quae nondum sunt, sed futura sunt sicut nostrorum spiritalium corporum resurrectio, ita creduntur, ut etiam uidenda sperentur; sed ostendi modo nullo possunt modo. quae uero ita sunt, ut neque praetereant neque futura sint, sed aeterna permaneant, partim sunt inuisibilia sicut iustitia, sicut sapientia, partim uisibilia sicut Christi inmortale iam corpus. sed inuisibilia intellecta conspiciuntur ac per hoc et ipsa modo quodam sibi congruo uidentur et, cum uidentur, multo certiora sunt quam ea, quae corporis sensus adtingit; sed ideo dicuntur inuisibilia. quia oculis istis mortalibus uideri omnino non possunt. at illa, quae uisibilia sunt permanentia, possunt, si ostendantur. etiam his mortalibus oculis conspici, sicut se discipulis post resurrectionem dominus ostendit, sicut etiam post ascensionem apostolo Paulo et diacono Stephano.

### English translation (Claude)

Of visible things that are past and have passed away in time there is faith alone, since they are not hoped to be seen in the future but are believed as done and accomplished; for example, that Christ died once for our sins and rose again, and will die no more, and death will no longer have dominion over him. But things that are not yet but are to come, like the resurrection of our spiritual bodies, are believed in such a way that they are also hoped to be seen; but they cannot be shown in any way at present. Things that exist in such a way that they neither pass away nor are future but remain eternal are partly invisible, like justice and wisdom, and partly visible, like the now immortal body of Christ. But the invisible things are seen by being understood, and so they too are seen in a way proper to them; and when they are seen they are far more certain than the things that the senses of the body reach; but they are called invisible because they cannot be seen at all by these mortal eyes. But the permanent visible things can be seen even by these mortal eyes, if they are shown, as the Lord showed himself to the disciples after the resurrection, and also after the ascension to the apostle Paul and to the deacon Stephen.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:18: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 1:20: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:3: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 7:55: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.9 (CSEL 34.2:711–712; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-9).

## Letter 120.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:712–713
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that visible things not yet seen are imagined, whereas invisible things like justice are beheld by the mind in an incorporeal light.

### Latin text

Proinde ista uisibilia permanentia ita credimus, ut, etiam si non demonstrentur, speremus ea nos quandoque uisuros nec ea conemur ratione intellectuque comprehendere, nisi ut ea, quia uisibilia sunt, ab inuisibilibus distinctius cogitemus, et, cum cogitatione, qualia sint, imaginamur, satis utique nouimus ea nobis nota non esse. nam et Antiochiam cogito incognitam sed non sicut Carthaginem cognitam; illam quippe uisionem cogitatio mea fingit, hanc recolit; nequaquam tamen dubito, siue quod de illa testibus multis siue quod de ista meis aspectibus credidi. iustitiam uero et sapientiam et quicquid eius modi est non aliter imaginamur, aliter contuemur, sed haec inuisibilia simplici mentis atque rationis intentione intellecta conspicimus sine ullis formis et molibus corporalibus, sine ullis liniamentis figurisque membrorum, sine ullis localibus siue finibus siue spatiis infinitis. ipsumque lumen, quo cuncta ista discernimus, in quo nobis satis apparet, quid credamus incognitum, quid cognitum teneamus, quam formam corporis recordemur, quam cogitatione fingamus, quid corporis sensus adtingat, quid imaginetur animus simile corpori, quid certum et omnium corporum dissimillimum intellegentia contempletur, hoc ergo lumen, ubi haec cuncta diiudicantur, non utique sicut huius solis et cuiusque corporei luminis fulgor per localia spatia circumquaque diffunditur mentemque nostram quasi uisibili candore conlustrat, sed inuisibiliter et ineffabiliter et tamen intellegibiliter lucet tamque nobis certum est, quam nobis effecit certa, quae secundum ipsum cuncta conspicimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, we believe these permanent visible things in such a way that, even if they are not shown to us, we hope that we shall see them some day; and we do not try to comprehend them by reason and understanding, except to think of them, since they are visible, as more clearly distinct from invisible things; and when we imagine in thought what they are like, we know well enough that they are not known to us. For I think of Antioch, which I do not know, but not as I think of Carthage, which I know; my thought pictures the appearance of the one and recalls that of the other; yet I in no way doubt either what I have believed about the former on the testimony of many or what I have believed about the latter from my own sight. But justice and wisdom and whatever is of that kind we do not imagine in one way and behold in another; rather, we behold these invisible things, understood by the simple attention of mind and reason, without any bodily forms and masses, without any lineaments and shapes of limbs, without any local boundaries or infinite spaces. And that very light by which we discern all these things, in which it is sufficiently clear to us what we believe without knowing, what we hold as known, what bodily form we remember, what we picture in thought, what the bodily sense reaches, what the mind imagines like a body, what the intelligence contemplates as certain and most unlike all bodies: this light, then, in which all these things are judged, is certainly not spread round about through local spaces like the brightness of this sun and of any bodily light, illuminating our mind as with a visible whiteness; rather it shines invisibly and ineffably and yet intelligibly, and is as certain to us as the things it makes certain to us, which we behold according to it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.10 (CSEL 34.2:712–713; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-10).

## Letter 120.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:713–714
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes bodily things, images of bodies, and intelligible things like wisdom, and argues that the Trinity must be thought of in the highest kind, free of all bodily likeness.

### Latin text

Cum igitur tria sint rerum genera, quae uidentur, unum corporalium, sicut sunt caelum et terra et quicquid in eis corporeus sensus cernit et tangit, alterum simile corporalibus, sicut sunt ea, quae spiritu cogitata imaginamur siue recordata uel oblata quasi corpora contuemur, unde sunt etiam uisiones, quae uel in somnis uel in aliquo mentis excessu his quasi localibus quantitatibus ingeruntur, tertium ab utroque discretum, quod neque sit corpus neque habeat ullam similitudinem corporis, sicuti est sapientia, quae mente intellecta conspicitur et in cuius luce de his omnibus ueraciter iudicatur, in quo istorum genere credendum est esse istam, quam nosse uolumus, trinitatem? profecto aut in aliquo aut in nullo. si in aliquo, eo utique, quod est aliis duobus praestantius, sicut est sapientia. quod si donum eius in nobis est et minus est quam illa summa et incommutabilis, quae dei sapientia dicitur — puto, quod non debemus dono suo inferius cogitare donantem — si autem aliquis splendor eius in nobis est, quae nostra sapientia dicitur, quantumcumque eius per speculum et in aenigmate capere possumus, oportet eam et ab omnibus corporibus et ab omnibus corporum similitudinibus secernamus.

### English translation (Claude)

There are, then, three kinds of things that are seen: one of bodily things, such as heaven and earth and whatever the bodily sense perceives and touches in them; another like bodily things, such as those which we imagine when they are thought of by the spirit, or which we behold as bodies when remembered or presented to us, from which come also the visions presented in sleep or in some ecstasy of mind with these quasi-local dimensions; a third distinct from both, which is neither body nor has any likeness of body, such as wisdom, which is beheld by being understood by the mind, and in whose light all these are truly judged. In which of these kinds is the Trinity, which we wish to know, to be believed to be? Surely either in one or in none. If in one, then certainly in that which is more excellent than the other two, such as wisdom. But if his gift in us is less than that supreme and unchangeable wisdom which is called the wisdom of God (and I think we ought not to think of the giver as lower than his gift); if, I say, some splendor of it is in us, which is called our wisdom, however much of it we can grasp through a mirror and in an enigma, we must separate it both from all bodies and from all likenesses of bodies.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.11 (CSEL 34.2:713–714; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-11).

## Letter 120.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:714–715
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine teaches that the Trinity surpasses all bodily things and is to be approached through understanding the soul made in God's image, or else held by faith until the promised vision.

### Latin text

Si autem in nullo istorum genere esse putanda est ista trinitas et sic est inuisibilis, ut nec mente uideatur, multo minus de illa huius modi opinionem habere debemus, ut eam rebus corporalibus uel corporalium rerum imaginibus similem esse credamus. non enim corpora pulchritudine molis aut magnitudine superat sed dissimilitudine ac disparilitate naturae et, si discreta est a comparatione bonorum animi nostri, qualia sunt sapientia, iustitia, caritas, castitas et cetera talia, quae profecto non mole corporis pendimus nec eorum quasi corporeas formas cogitatione figuramus, sed ea, quando recte intellegimus, sine aliqua corpulentia uel similitudine corpulentiae in luce mentis aspicimus, quanto est ab omnium qualitatum et quantitatum corporalium comparatione discretior! non eam tamen a nostro intellectu omnino abhorrere apostolus testis est, ubi ait: Inuisibilia enim eius a constitutione mundi per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur, sempiterna quoque eius uirtus ac diuinitas. ac per hoc, cum eadem trinitas fecerit et corpus et animam, sine dubitatione est utroque praestantior. anima itaque considerata, maxime humana et rationalis atque intellectualis, quae ad eius imaginem facta est, si cogitationes nostras et intellegentias non euicerit, sed eius, quod habet praecipuum, id est ipsam mentem atque intellegentiam mente atque intellegentia potuerimus adprehendere, non erit fortassis absurdum, ut eam ad suum quoque creatorem intellegendum ipso adiuuante meditemur adtollere. si autem in se ipsa deficit sibique succumbit, pia fide contenta sit, quam diu peregrinatur a domino, donec fiat in homine, quod promissum est, faciente illo, qui potens est, sicut ait apostolus, facere supra, quam petimus et intellegimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if this Trinity is to be thought to be in none of these kinds, and is so invisible that it is not seen even by the mind, much less ought we to hold such an opinion of it as to believe that it is like bodily things or the images of bodily things. For it surpasses bodies not by the beauty of its mass or its magnitude but by the unlikeness and disparity of its nature; and if it is set apart from comparison with the goods of our mind, such as wisdom, justice, love, chastity, and the like, which we certainly do not weigh by bodily mass nor picture with quasi-bodily forms in thought, but, when we understand rightly, behold in the light of the mind without any corporeality or likeness of corporeality, how much more is it set apart from comparison with all bodily qualities and quantities! Yet that it is not wholly beyond our understanding the apostle is witness, when he says: “For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are seen, being understood through the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity.” And therefore, since the same Trinity made both body and soul, it is without doubt more excellent than both. So when the soul has been considered, especially the human soul, rational and intellectual, which was made in his image, if it does not defeat our thoughts and understanding, but we are able to grasp by mind and understanding what is chief in it, that is, the mind and understanding itself, it will perhaps not be absurd for us to try, with his help, to raise it to the understanding of its creator too. But if it fails in itself and gives way to itself, let it be content with pious faith as long as it is a pilgrim away from the Lord, until what is promised is accomplished in man by him who is able, as the apostle says, to do beyond what we ask and understand.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:27: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:20: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.12 (CSEL 34.2:714–715; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-12).

## Letter 120.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:715–716
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the rule of faith on the Trinity, tells Consentius to reject every bodily image of God, and urges him to love understanding.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, interim uolo, ut legas ea, quae ad istam quaestionem pertinentia iam multa conscripsimus, illa etiam, quae in manibus habemus et propter magnitudinem tam difficilis quaestionis nondum possumus explicare. nunc uero tene inconcussa fide patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum esse trinitatem et tamen unum deum, non quod sit eorum communis quasi quarta diuinitas, sed quod sit ipsa ineffabiliter inseparabilis trinitas, patremque solum genuisse filium filiumque solum a patre genitum, spiritum uero sanctum et patris esse et filii spiritum. et quicquid tibi, cum ista cogitas, corporeae similitudinis occurrerit, abnue, nega, respue, abice, fuge; non enim parua inchoatio est cogitationis dei, si ante, quam possimus nosse, quid sit, incipiamus iam nosse, quid non sit. intellectum uero ualde ama, quia et ipsae scripturae sanctae, quae magnarum rerum ante intellegentiam suadent fidem, nisi eas recte intellegas, utiles tibi esse non possunt. omnes enim haeretici, qui eas in auctoritate recipiunt, ipsas sibi uidentur sectari, cum suos potius sectentur errores, ac per hoc, non quod eas contemnant, sed quod eas non intellegant, haeretici sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Since this is so, meanwhile I want you to read the many things we have already written that pertain to this question, and also those we have in hand and, because of the magnitude of so difficult a question, cannot yet complete. But for now hold with unshaken faith that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are a Trinity and yet one God; not that there is a common, as it were fourth, divinity of theirs, but that the Trinity itself is ineffably inseparable; and that the Father alone begot the Son, and the Son alone was begotten by the Father, while the Holy Spirit is the Spirit both of the Father and of the Son. And whatever bodily likeness occurs to you when you think of these things, refuse it, deny it, reject it, cast it away, flee it; for it is no small beginning of the thought of God if, before we can know what he is, we begin to know what he is not. But love understanding greatly, because even the holy Scriptures themselves, which urge faith in great things before understanding, cannot be useful to you unless you understand them rightly. For all the heretics who receive them as authoritative seem to themselves to follow them, while they rather follow their own errors; and therefore they are heretics not because they despise the Scriptures but because they do not understand them.

### Translation notes

- The works “in hand” include Augustine's On the Trinity, then in progress.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.13 (CSEL 34.2:715–716; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/119-1/#p-120-13).

## Letter 120.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:716–717
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Consentius to pray for understanding and shows from Isaiah's conflicting images that Scripture's bodily language about God must be understood spiritually.

### Latin text

Tu autem, carissime, ora fortiter et fideliter, ut det tibi dominus intellectum ac sic ea, quae forinsecus adhibet diligentia praeceptoris siue doctoris, possint esse fructuosa, quoniam, neque qui plantat, est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus, cui dicimus: Pater noster, qui es in caelis, non quia ibi est et hic non est, qui praesentia incorporea ubique totus est, sed quod in eis habitare dicitur, quorum pietati adest, et hi maxime in caelis sunt, ubi et nostra est conuersatio, si nos ueraciter os nostrum sursum cor habere respondeat. nam etsi carnaliter acciperemus, quod scriptum est: Caelum mihi sedes est, terra autem scabellum pedum meorum, et ibi et hic eum esse credere debemus, quamuis non totum ibi, quia hic essent pedes, nec totum hic, quia ibi essent superiores corporis partes. quam cogitationem carnalem rursum nobis illud excuteret, quod de illo scriptum est, quia caelum mensus est palmo et terram pugillo. quis enim sedeat in spatio palmi sui aut in tanto loco pedes ponat, quantum eius pugnus adprehendit? nisi forte in tantum caro uana progreditur, ut ei parum sit humana membra substantiae dei tribuere, si ea non etiam monstruosa confingat, ubi palmus lumbis et pugillus plantis ambabus coniunctisque sit latior. sed haec dicuntur. ut, cum sibi non conueniunt, quae carnaliter audimus, eis ipsis admoniti ineffabiliter spiritalia cogitemus.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, dearest brother, pray strongly and faithfully that the Lord may give you understanding, so that the things which the diligence of an instructor or teacher applies from outside may be fruitful; since neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth, to whom we say, “Our Father, who are in heaven”: not because he is there and not here, he who by incorporeal presence is whole everywhere, but because he is said to dwell in those whom he aids in their piety by his presence; and these are chiefly in the heavens, where our citizenship also is, if our mouth truly answers that we have our heart lifted up. For even if we took carnally what is written, “Heaven is my seat, but the earth the footstool of my feet,” we ought to believe that he is both there and here, though not wholly there, since his feet would be here, nor wholly here, since the upper parts of his body would be there. That carnal thought would in turn be shaken out of us by what is written of him, that he measured heaven with his palm and the earth with his fist. For who would sit in the space of his own palm, or set his feet in a place no bigger than his fist can hold? Unless perhaps vain flesh goes so far that it is not enough for it to attribute human limbs to the substance of God unless it also fashions monstrous ones, where the palm is broader than the loins and the fist broader than both soles put together. But these things are said so that, when the things we take carnally do not agree with one another, we may be admonished by them to think of spiritual things ineffably.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 66:1: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Our heart lifted up” alludes to the liturgical dialogue (Sursum corda, “Lift up your hearts”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.14 (CSEL 34.2:716–717; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-14).

## Letter 120.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:717–718
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that “the right hand” of the Father means blessedness, and interprets “Do not touch me” as a call to touch Christ by faith in his equality with the Father.

### Latin text

Unde etiam si corpus domini, quod de sepulcro excitatum leuauit in caelum, non nisi in specie humana membrisque cogitamus, non tamen ita putandum est sedere ad dexteram patris, ut ei pater ad sinistram sedere uideatur. in illa quippe beatitudine, quae omnem superat humanum intellectum, sola dextera est et eadem dextera eiusdem beatitudinis nomen est. proinde nec illud, quod post resurrectionem suam dixit Mariae: Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad patrem, tam absurde accipiendum est, ut aestimemus eum, cum ascendisset, uoluisse a feminis tangi, qui se tangendum uiris ante, quam ascenderet, praebuit. sed Mariae profecto, in qua figura ecclesia est, quando illud dixit, intellegi uoluit tunc ascendisse ad patrem, cum illum patri cognouit aequalem et tali fide illum salubriter tetigit, ne, si hoc solum eum esse crederet, quod in carne apparuerat, non bene tangeret. sic eum Photinus haereticus tetigit, qui hominem tantum modo Christum credidit.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence, even if we think of the Lord's body, which he raised from the tomb and lifted into heaven, only in human form and limbs, we must not think that he sits at the right hand of the Father in such a way that the Father appears to sit at his left. For in that blessedness which surpasses all human understanding there is only a right hand, and that same right hand is the name of that same blessedness. Accordingly, not even what he said to Mary after his resurrection, “Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father,” is to be taken so absurdly that we suppose he wished to be touched by women once he had ascended, he who offered himself to be touched by men before he ascended. But surely, when he said this, he wished it to be understood by Mary, in whom the church is figured, that he would have ascended to the Father for her when she recognized him as equal to the Father, and touched him with such faith for her salvation; lest, if she believed him to be only what had appeared in the flesh, she should not touch him rightly. So the heretic Photinus touched him, who believed Christ to be a man only.

### Scripture references

- Mark 16:19: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:39: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.15 (CSEL 34.2:717–718; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-15).

## Letter 120.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:718
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the view that the persons are localized in heaven while their common divinity is everywhere, since the divinity can be neither a quality nor another substance.

### Latin text

Et si forte in his uerbis domini aliud aptius meliusque intellegi potest, opinio tamen, qua putatur substantia esse patris in caelo, secundum quod pater una in trinitate persona est, diuinitas uero non in caelo tantum sed ubique est, quasi aliud sit pater aliud diuinitas eius, quae illi communis est cum filio et spiritu sancto, ut ipsa trinitas tamquam locis corporalibus et tamquam corporea sit, diuinitas uero una trium personarum ubique sit praesens et ipsa sola tamquam incorporea ubique sit tota, sine dubitatione respuenda est. si enim qualitas eorum esset — quod absit, ut in patre aut filio aut spiritu sancto aliud sit qualitas aliud substantia —, tamen si eorum qualitas esse posset, utique amplius alicui quam in sua substantia esse non posset; si autem substantia est et alia est, quam sunt ipsi, alia substantia est, quod nihilo minus falsissime creditur.

### English translation (Claude)

And even if something more fitting and better can perhaps be understood in these words of the Lord, the opinion must without hesitation be rejected by which it is thought that the substance of the Father is in heaven, inasmuch as the Father is one person in the Trinity, while the divinity is not in heaven only but everywhere; as though the Father were one thing and his divinity, which he has in common with the Son and the Holy Spirit, another, so that the Trinity itself is as it were in bodily places and as it were corporeal, while the one divinity of the three persons is present everywhere and alone, as being incorporeal, is whole everywhere. For if it were their quality (and far be it that in the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit quality should be one thing and substance another), yet if it could be their quality, it certainly could not extend anywhere beyond its own substance; but if it is a substance and is other than they themselves are, it is another substance, which is likewise believed most falsely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.16 (CSEL 34.2:718; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-16).

## Letter 120.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:718–719
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the divinity cannot be something other than the Trinity, since the three are one God by being of one and the same substance or essence.

### Latin text

Sed si forte minus intellegis, inter qualitatem atque substantiam quid intersit, hoc certe facilius aduertis, quod et diuinitas trinitatis — quae putatur alia esse, quam est ipsa trinitas, et propter hanc dici non tres deos sed unum deum, quoniam ipsa est tribus una communis — aut substantia est aut non est substantia. si substantia est et alia est quam pater aut filius aut spiritus sanctus aut eadem simul trinitas, procul dubio alia substantia est; hoc autem ueritas refellit et respuit. si autem non est substantia ista diuinitas et ipsa est deus, quia ipsa est ubique tota, non illa trinitas, ergo deus non est substantia; quis hoc catholicus dixerit? item si non est substantia ista diuinitas et secundum hanc est trinitas unus deus, quod haec una est in tribus, non debuit dici pater et filius et spiritus sanctus unius substantiae sed unius diuinitatis, quae non est substantia. agnoscis autem in fide catholica, quoniam hoc est uerum, hoc esse firmatum, quod pater et filius et spiritus sanctus ideo, cum sit trinitas, unus est deus, quod inseparabiliter sint unius eiusdemque substantiae uel, si hoc melius dicitur, essentiae. nam nonnulli nostri et maxime Graeci trinitatem, quae deus est, magis essentiam quam unam substantiam esse dixerunt aliquid inter haec duo nomina esse arbitrantes uel intellegentes, unde nunc disputare non opus est, quod, etsi diuinitatem istam, quae aliud existimatur esse quam ipsa trinitas, non substantiam sed essentiam dixerimus, eadem falsitas consequetur. si enim alia est quam ipsa trinitas, altera erit essentia, quod absit ut catholicus sentiat. restat itaque, ut ita credamus unius esse substantiae trinitatem, ut ipsa essentia non aliud sit quam ipsa trinitas. ad quam uidendam quantum libet in hac uita proficiamus, per speculum erit et in aenigmate, quod uidebimus. cum uero, quod in resurrectione promittitur, spiritale corpus habere coeperimus, siue illam mente siue mirabili modo, quoniam ineffabilis est spiritalis corporis gratia, etiam corpore uideamus, non tamen per locorum interualla nec in parte minorem in parte maiorem, quoniam non est corpus et ubique tota est, pro nostra capacitate uidebimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if perhaps you do not quite understand the difference between quality and substance, you will certainly notice this more easily: that the divinity of the Trinity (which is thought to be other than the Trinity itself, and on whose account the Trinity is said to be not three gods but one God, because it is one and common to the three) either is a substance or is not. If it is a substance and is other than the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit or the Trinity itself together, it is without doubt another substance; but truth refutes and rejects this. But if this divinity is not a substance and is itself God, because it, and not that Trinity, is whole everywhere, then God is not a substance; what Catholic would say this? Again, if this divinity is not a substance, and according to it the Trinity is one God because it is one in the three, it ought not to have been said that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are of one substance, but of one divinity which is not a substance. But you recognize that in the Catholic faith, because it is true, this has been firmly established: that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, though a Trinity, are one God for this reason, that they are inseparably of one and the same substance or, if this is a better way of saying it, essence. For some of our writers, and especially the Greeks, have said that the Trinity which is God is one essence rather than one substance, thinking or understanding that there is some difference between these two names, which we need not dispute now; for even if we call this divinity, which is thought to be other than the Trinity itself, not a substance but an essence, the same falsehood will follow. For if it is other than the Trinity itself, it will be another essence, which far be it that a Catholic should think. It remains, then, that we believe that the Trinity is of one substance in such a way that the essence itself is nothing other than the Trinity itself. However much we advance in this life toward seeing it, what we shall see will be through a mirror and in an enigma. But when we have begun to have the spiritual body which is promised in the resurrection, whether we see it with the mind or, in a wonderful way (since the grace of the spiritual body is ineffable), even with the body, we shall see it according to our capacity, not through intervals of places, nor as smaller in one part and greater in another, since it is not a body and is whole everywhere.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Greek writers spoke of one ousia (essence) and three hypostases, so Latin “substance” was ambiguous for them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.17 (CSEL 34.2:718–719; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-17).

## Letter 120.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:719–720
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Consentius that justice does live in itself, since souls that lose it are called dead, and justice is the life of lives.

### Latin text

Quod uero posuisti in epistula tua uideri tibi uel potius, quod uidebatur tibi nihil uiuum secundum substantiam inesse iustitiae ideoque te non posse adhuc deum, id est uiuentem naturam iustitiae similem cogitare, quae iustitia, sicut dicis, non in se sed in nobis uiuit, immo potius nos secundum illam uiuimus, ipsa uero per se iustitia nequaquam uiuit ad hoc ut tibi ipse respondeas, illud intuere, utrum recte dici possit uitam ipsam non uiuere, qua fit, ut uiuat, quicquid non falso dicimus uiuere. puto enim absurdum tibi uideri, ut per uitam uiuatur et uita non uiuat porro si uita ipsa praecipue uiuit, qua uiuit omne, quod uiuit, recole, obsecro, quas dicat scriptura diuina animas mortuas; profecto inuenies iniustas, impias, infideles. nam licet per illas uiuant corpora impiorum, de quibus dictum est, quod mortui sepeliant mortuos suos, et ibi intellegantur etiam iniquae animae non esse sine aliqua uita — neque enim aliter ex eis possent corpora uiuere nisi qualicumque uita, qua omnino animae carere non possunt, unde inmortales merito uocantur —, non tamen ob aliud amissa iustitia dicuntur mortuae, nisi quia et animarum licet inmortaliter uita qualicumque uiuentium uerior et maior uita iustitia est tamquam uita uitarum, quae cum sunt in corporibus, etiam ipsa corpora uiua sunt, quae per se ipsa uiuere nequeunt. quapropter si animae non possunt nisi etiam in se ipsis utcumque uiuere, quia ex eis uiuunt et corpora, a quibus deserta moriuntur, quanto magis uera iustitia etiam in se ipsa uiuere intellegenda est, ex qua sic uiuunt animae, ut hac amissa mortuae nuncupentur, quamuis quantulacumque uita non desinant uiuere!

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you put in your letter, that it seems to you, or rather that it seemed to you, that there is nothing living according to substance in justice, and that therefore you cannot yet think of God, that is, a living nature, as like justice, since justice, as you say, “lives not in itself but in us, or rather we live according to it, but justice itself does not live at all by itself”: to answer yourself on this point, consider whether it can rightly be said that life itself does not live, by which whatever we truly say lives comes to live. For I think it seems absurd to you that one should live by life and life itself not live. Further, if life itself above all lives, by which everything that lives lives, recall, I beg you, which souls divine Scripture calls dead; you will surely find the unjust, the impious, the unbelieving. For although the bodies of the impious live through them (of whom it was said, “Let the dead bury their own dead”), and it is understood there that even wicked souls are not without some life (for bodies could not live from them except by some kind of life, which souls cannot lack at all, whence they are rightly called immortal), yet they are said to be dead, having lost justice, for no other reason than that justice is a truer and greater life even of souls, though they live immortally with some kind of life; justice is, as it were, the life of lives, and when souls are in bodies even the bodies themselves are alive, which cannot live of themselves. Wherefore, if souls cannot help living somehow even in themselves, since from them bodies too live, which die when deserted by them, how much more must true justice be understood to live even in itself, from which souls so live that when it is lost they are called dead, although they do not cease to live with some small life!

### Scripture references

- Matt 8:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Iustitia is rendered “justice” in 120.18–20, following Consentius's question; it also means “righteousness”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.18 (CSEL 34.2:719–720; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-18).

## Letter 120.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-19
- Source: CSEL 34.2:720–721
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine identifies the justice that lives in itself with God, in whom we participate by cleaving to him, as Christ was made our justice.

### Latin text

Ea porro iustitia, quae uiuit in se ipsa, procul dubio deus est atque incommutabiliter uiuit. sicut autem, cum sit in se ipsa uita, etiam nobis fit uita, cum eius efficimur utcumque participes, ita, cum in se ipsa sit iustitia, etiam nobis fit iustitia, cum ei cohaerendo iuste uiuimus, et tanto magis minusue iusti sumus, quanto illi magis minusue cohaeremus. unde scriptum est de unigenito filio dei, cum sit utique patris sapientia atque iustitia et semper in se ipsa sit, quod factus sit nobis a deo sapientia et iustitia et sanctificatio et redemptio, ut, quem ad modum scriptum est, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. quod quidem et ipse uidisti addendo atque dicendo: Nisi forte non haec humanae aequitatis sed illa, quae deus est, sola adseratur esse iustitia, est plane ille summus deus uera iustitia uel ille uerus deus summa iustitia, quam profecto esurire ac sitire ea nostra est in hac peregrinatione iustitia et qua postea saturari ea nostra est in aeternitate plena iustitia. non ergo deum nostrae iustitiae similem cogitemus, sed cogitemus nos potius tanto similiores deo, quanto esse potuerimus eius participatione iustiores.

### English translation (Claude)

That justice, then, which lives in itself is without doubt God, and lives unchangeably. And just as, being life in itself, it becomes life for us too when we are made partakers of it in some way, so, being justice in itself, it becomes justice for us too when by cleaving to it we live justly; and we are more or less just the more or less we cleave to it. Hence it is written of the only-begotten Son of God, who is certainly the wisdom and justice of the Father and is always in himself, that he was made for us by God wisdom and justice and sanctification and redemption, so that, as it is written, he who glories may glory in the Lord. This indeed you yourself saw, when you added: “Unless perhaps it is asserted that not this human equity but only that which is God is justice.” Plainly that supreme God is true justice, or that true God is supreme justice; to hunger and thirst for it is our justice in this pilgrimage, and to be filled with it afterward will be our full justice in eternity. Let us not, then, think of God as like our justice, but rather think that we are the more like God the more just we can become by participation in him.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:30: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:6: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.19 (CSEL 34.2:720–721; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-19).

## Letter 120.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-20
- Source: CSEL 34.2:721–723
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that God's beauty, like the beauty of justice in the inner man, is not bodily, and urges Consentius to correct his own errors humbly.

### Latin text

Si ergo cauendum est, ne iustitiae nostrae similem putemus deum, quoniam lumen, quod inluminat, incomparabiliter excellentius est illo, quod inluminatur, quanto magis caueri oportet, ne aliquid inferius et quodam modo decoloratius eum esse credamus, quam est nostra iustitia! quid est autem aliud iustitia, cum in nobis est, uel quaelibet uirtus, qua recte sapienterque uiuitur, quam interioris hominis pulchritudo? et certe secundum hanc pulchritudinem magis quam corpus sumus ad imaginem dei, unde nobis dicitur: Nolite conformari huic saeculo, sed reformamini in nouitate mentis uestrae ad probandum uos, quae sit uoluntas dei, quod bonum et placitum et perfectum. si ergo non in mole neque in distantibus per loca sua partibus, sicut corpora siue cernuntur siue cogitantur, sed in uirtute intellegibili, qualis est iustitia, mentem dicimus seu nouimus seu uolumus pulchram et secundum hanc pulchritudinem reformamur ad imaginem dei, profecto ipsius dei, qui nos formauit et reformat ad imaginem suam, non in aliqua mole corporea suspicanda est pulchritudo eoque iustorum mentibus credendus est incomparabiliter pulchrior, quo est incomparabiliter iustior. haec dilectionem tuam, quantum ad usitatum epistularum modum pertinet, prolixius forsitan, quam expectabas. quantum autem ad tam magnae rei quaestionem, breuiter admonuisse suffecerit, non ut satis sit eruditioni tuae, sed ut aliis quoque lectis auditisue diligenter instructus ipse uberius tua secus dicta redarguas, quod est utique tanto melius, quanto fit humilius et fidelius.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, we must beware of thinking God like our justice, since the light that illuminates is incomparably more excellent than what is illuminated, how much more must we beware of believing him to be something lower and in a way more faded than our justice! And what else is justice, when it is in us, or any virtue by which one lives rightly and wisely, than the beauty of the inner man? And certainly it is according to this beauty, rather than according to the body, that we are in the image of God; hence it is said to us: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be reformed in the newness of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” If, then, we speak of the mind, or know it, or wish it to be beautiful, not in mass nor in parts set apart in their places, as bodies are either seen or thought of, but in an intelligible virtue such as justice, and according to this beauty we are reformed in the image of God, surely the beauty of God himself, who formed us and re-forms us in his image, is not to be imagined in any bodily mass; and he is to be believed incomparably more beautiful than the minds of the just, in the degree that he is incomparably more just. I have reminded Your Love of these things, perhaps at greater length than you expected, as regards the usual measure of letters, but, as regards the question of so great a matter, briefly enough: not so that it may suffice for your instruction, but so that, carefully instructed also by other things you read or hear, you may yourself more fully refute what you have said wrongly; which is certainly the better the more humbly and faithfully it is done.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:2: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Col 3:10: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 120.20 (CSEL 34.2:721–723; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/120-14/#p-120-20).

## Letter 121.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:723
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus of Nola sends Augustine a set of questions on difficult passages of Scripture.

### Latin text

De paucis, quae nunc iam ad nauem currente litterarum perlatore et mihi in ipsius festinatione properanti in mentem uenerunt, ne sine corollario mihi rescribas, aliqua proponam. quae si forte lucida sunt et mihi uidentur obscura, nemo prudentium filiorum, qui forte de nostris in hora lectiunculae huius circa te steterint, de insipientia mea rideat, sed potius beniuolentia fraternae caritatis faueat instruendo, ut efficiar uidentium particeps et ex doctrina tua inluminatis mentibus considerantium mirabilia de lege domini.

### English translation (Claude)

I will put to you a few of the questions that have come to mind now, as the bearer of this letter is already hurrying to his ship and I am hurried along by his haste, so that you may not write back to me without a little something extra. If perhaps they are clear and only seem obscure to me, let none of the wise sons from among our people who may be standing around you when this little piece is read laugh at my foolishness, but rather let them favor me with the kindness of brotherly love by instructing me, so that I may become a sharer with those who see and who, with minds enlightened by your teaching, consider the wonderful things of the law of the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Ps 119:18 (118:18 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Paulinus, bishop of Nola.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.1 (CSEL 34.2:723; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-1).

## Letter 121.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:723–725
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks what Psalm 16 means by the “saints in his land,” suggesting it refers to the Jews who glory in descent and the law, like the Pharisee in the parable.

### Latin text

Dic ergo mihi, benedicte doctor Israhel, quid sit, quod dicit in psalmo quinto decimo: Sanctis, qui in terra sunt eius, mirificauit omnes uoluntates suas inter illos. multiplicatae sunt enim infirmitates eorum; postea accelerauerunt. quos ait sanctos, qui in terra sint sancti? num illos Iudaeos, qui filii carnis Abrahae et non filii repromissionis excluduntur a semine, quod in Isaac uocatum est, ideo sanctos in terra, quia sancti genere carnali, uita autem sensuque terreni sunt, qui terrena sapiunt et carnali obseruantia in uetustate litterae consenescunt non renascentes in nouam creaturam, quia non receperunt eum, per quem uetera transierunt et facta sunt noua? sic enim forte eos in hoc psalmo sanctos appellat, quo modo et in euangelio iustos, ubi dicit: Non ueni iustos uocare sed peccatores, id est illos iustos. qui in sanctitate generis et littera legis gloriantur, quibus dicitur: Nolite gloriari patrem Abraham, quia potens est deus de lapidibus istis excitare filios Abraham. quorum forma in illo Pharisaeo proponitur, qui iustitias suas tamquam nescienti domino recolens praedicabat in templo non orans, ut exaudiretur, sed exigens quasi debitum meriti pro operibus bonis quidem sed ingratis deo, quia, quod iustitia aedificauerat, superbia destruebat nec id ipsum silentio sed uoce clamabat, ut appareret eum non diuinis auribus loqui, quia et ab hominibus uellet audiri; atque ideo non placuit deo, quia placebat sibi: Quoniam dissipauit dominus ossa hominum sibi placentium. confusi sunt, inquit, quia spreuit illos, qui cor humile et contribulatum non spernit.

### English translation (Claude)

Tell me, then, blessed teacher of Israel, what it means that he says in the fifteenth psalm: “To the saints who are in his land he has made wonderful all his wills among them. For their infirmities were multiplied; afterward they hastened.” Whom does he call saints who are saints in the land? Is it those Jews who, being children of Abraham's flesh and not children of the promise, are excluded from the seed that is called in Isaac; saints in the land because they are saints by carnal descent, but earthly in life and mind, minding earthly things and growing old in carnal observance in the oldness of the letter, not reborn into a new creation, because they did not receive him through whom the old things passed away and became new? For perhaps he calls them saints in this psalm in the same way as he calls them righteous in the gospel, where he says, “I did not come to call the righteous but sinners,” that is, those righteous who glory in the holiness of their race and in the letter of the law, to whom it is said: “Do not boast that you have Abraham as your father, for God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham.” Their type is set forth in that Pharisee who, recounting his righteous deeds as though to a Lord who did not know them, proclaimed them in the temple, not praying to be heard but demanding as a debt the reward of merit for works that were good indeed but not pleasing to God, because what righteousness had built pride destroyed; and he did not even do this in silence but cried it aloud, so that it was clear that he was not speaking to the divine ears, since he wanted to be heard by men too; and therefore he did not please God, because he pleased himself: “Because the Lord has scattered the bones of men who please themselves. They are put to shame,” it says, “because he has despised them,” he who does not despise a humble and contrite heart.

### Scripture references

- Ps 16:3 (15:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:17: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:11: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 18:12: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 53:5 (52:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The psalm numbers follow the Latin (Septuagint) numbering: Ps 16:3–4 (LXX 15:3–4). Paulinus's interpretation concerning the Jews is his own and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.2 (CSEL 34.2:723–725; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-2).

## Letter 121.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-3
- Source: CSEL 34.2:725–726
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus contrasts the proud Pharisee with the humble tax collector, and righteousness from the law with the righteousness of faith reckoned to Abraham.

### Latin text

Denique et in ipsa euangelii parabola, qua Pharisaei et publicani persona confertur, euidenter ostendit ipse dominus, quid in homine suscipiat, quid repellat, sicut scriptum est, quia deus superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam. ideo protestatur magis iustificatum abisse e templo publicanum de confessione peccatorum suorum quam Pharisaeum de inputatione iustitiarum suarum. merito autem ille laudator sui repudiatus abscessit a facie dei, qui cum ipso nomine peritiam legis praeferret, oblitus fuerat in propheta dicentem dominum: Super quem habitabo nisi super humilem et quietum et trementem sermones meos? ille autem in corde contrito sui accusator accipitur et obtinet ueniam de confessis peccatis propter gratiam humilitatis sancto illo Pharisaeo, quales Iudaei sancti sunt, reportante sarcinam peccatorum de iactantia sanctitatis. ipsius nimirum sunt forma Iudaei illi, de quibus apostolus ait, quod suam iustitiam statuere cupientes, quae ex lege est, iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti, quae est ex fide, quae reputata est Abraham patri nostro ad iustitiam non ex operibus, quia secundum omnipotentiam dei credidit deo, apud quem ille uere iustus est, qui ex fide uiuit nec sanctus in terra est sed in caelo, quia non carne sed spiritu ambulat, cuius conuersatio in caelis est non glorianti in concisione carnis sed in circumcisione cordis, quae non littera sed spiritu agitur inuisibiliter, unde laus eius non est ex hominibus sed ex deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, in the very parable of the gospel in which the figures of the Pharisee and the tax collector are compared, the Lord himself plainly shows what he accepts in a man and what he rejects, as it is written that God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble. Therefore he declares that the tax collector went away from the temple justified by the confession of his sins rather than the Pharisee by the reckoning of his righteous deeds. And rightly did that self-praiser go away rejected from the face of God, who, though by his very name he displayed expertise in the law, had forgotten the Lord saying in the prophet: “Upon whom shall I dwell but upon the humble and quiet and one who trembles at my words?” But the other, accusing himself in a contrite heart, is accepted and obtains pardon for the sins he confessed because of the grace of humility, while that holy Pharisee (holy in the way the Jews are holy) carried home the burden of his sins from his boasting of holiness. Of him indeed those Jews are a type of whom the apostle says that, desiring to establish their own righteousness, which is from the law, they did not submit to the righteousness of God, which is from faith; the righteousness that was reckoned to our father Abraham, not from works, because he believed God according to God's omnipotence; before whom he is truly righteous who lives by faith, and is holy not on earth but in heaven, because he walks not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit, whose citizenship is in heaven, who glories not in the cutting of the flesh but in the circumcision of the heart, which is done invisibly, not in the letter but in the spirit, whence his praise is not from men but from God.

### Scripture references

- Luke 18:14: allusion, high confidence
- Jas 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 5:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Isa 66:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 4:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:21: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 1:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:2: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 2:29: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.3 (CSEL 34.2:725–726; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-3).

## Letter 121.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-4
- Source: CSEL 34.2:726–727
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus suggests that God made his will wonderful among the Jews through the law and the incarnation and miracles of Christ, whom they rejected.

### Latin text

Deinde quod iungit in eodem uersiculo: Mirificauit uoluntates suas inter illos, credo ex eo dicit, quod ipsis primum lucernam legis accendit et praecepta uiuendi dedit. notas, enim inquit, fecit uias suas Moysi et filiis Israhel uoluntates suas. deinde ipsum pietatis suae sacramentum in ipsis operatus est natus in carne ex uirgine deus in gente ipsorum et de carne ipsorum factus ex semine Dauid homo, deinde uirtutes sanitatum, quas in ipsis et coram ipsis perfecit quippe haec non modo creditus sed et blasphematus ab eis, cum dicerent: Hic homo si a deo esset, non curaret sabbatis et: Non eicit daemonia nisi in Beelzebub principe daemoniorum. propter hanc mentem obdurata impietate caecatam multiplicatae sunt infirmitates et tenebrae eorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Next, what he adds in the same verse, “he has made wonderful his wills among them,” I believe he says because he first lit the lamp of the law for them and gave them precepts for living. “He made known,” it says, “his ways to Moses, his wills to the children of Israel.” Then he worked the very mystery of his piety among them: God born in the flesh of a virgin in their nation, and made man from their flesh, of the seed of David; then the mighty works of healing, which he performed among them and before them, being for these things not believed but even blasphemed by them, when they said, “If this man were from God, he would not heal on the sabbath,” and, “He casts out demons only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons.” Because of this mind, blinded by hardened impiety, their infirmities and darkness were multiplied.

### Scripture references

- Ps 103:7 (102:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The text prints “non modo creditus” (“not only believed”); the sense requires “not believed”, which is translated.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.4 (CSEL 34.2:726–727; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-4).

## Letter 121.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-5
- Source: CSEL 34.2:727–728
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks whether “afterward they hastened” means the repentance of those converted at Pentecost or the haste of those who demanded Christ's crucifixion.

### Latin text

Sed quid est, quod ait: Postea accelerauerunt? utrum in paenitentiam sicut illi in actibus apostolorum, qui beati Petri praedicatione compuncti crediderunt in eum, quem crucifixerant, et festinantes tanto expiari peccato ad donum gratiae cucurrerunt? an uero, quia uirtutes animae ex fide et caritate dei roborantur, illis impiis utroque uacuis multiplicatae sunt infirmitates animae ex impietate scelerum mortiferis languoribus occupatae? Christus etenim lumen et uita credentium est et sanitas sub pennis eius. unde non mirum, si et tenebrae et infirmitates eorum multiplicatae sunt in interitum, qui uitam et lucem non receperunt neque sub pennis eius manere uoluerunt, quos, ut ipse flens in euangelio suo protestatur, saepe uoluit congregare sub alas suas, sicut gallina congregat pullos suos, et noluerunt. multiplicatis ergo infirmitatibus quo accelerauerunt? forte in crucem domini conclamandam et inuito Pilato nefariis uocibus extorquendam, ut adimplerent mensuram patrum suorum, ut isti dominum prophetarum occiderent, quorum patres ipsos prophetas interfecerunt, a quibus hic mundi saluator esse uenturus nuntiabatur. postea accelerauerunt; ueloces enim pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem. contritio et infelicitas in uiis eorum et uiam pacis non cognouerunt, id est Christum, qui dicit: Ego sum uia.

### English translation (Claude)

But what does he mean by “afterward they hastened”? Was it to repentance, like those in the Acts of the Apostles who, pierced to the heart by blessed Peter's preaching, believed in him whom they had crucified and, hastening to be cleansed from so great a sin, ran to the gift of grace? Or rather, since the powers of the soul are strengthened by faith and the love of God, were the infirmities of the soul multiplied for those impious men, empty of both, as their souls were seized by the deadly sicknesses of the crimes that come from impiety? For Christ is the light and life of believers, and healing is under his wings. Hence it is no wonder if the darkness and infirmities of those who did not receive the life and the light, nor wished to remain under his wings, were multiplied to their destruction; those whom, as he himself declares with weeping in his gospel, he often wished to gather under his wings as a hen gathers her chicks, and they would not. With their infirmities multiplied, then, to what did they hasten? Perhaps to shouting for the Lord's cross and extorting it from an unwilling Pilate with wicked cries, so as to fill up the measure of their fathers, so that these killed the Lord of the prophets whose fathers killed the prophets themselves, by whom it was announced that this Savior of the world would come. “Afterward they hastened”; for “their feet are swift to shed blood; destruction and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace they have not known,” that is, Christ, who says, “I am the way.”

### Scripture references

- Acts 2:37: allusion, high confidence
- Mal 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 23:37: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:32: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Paulinus's application of Rom 3:15–17 to the Jews is his own and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.5 (CSEL 34.2:727–728; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-5).

## Letter 121.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-6
- Source: CSEL 34.2:728
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks for an explanation of Psalm 17:14 and its variant readings “pork” and “sons.”

### Latin text

In consequenti psalmo illud mihi exponi desidero, quid dicat: De absconditis tuis adimpletus est uenter eorum. saturati sunt porcina uel, sicut in quibusdam psalteriis scriptum audio, saturati sunt filiis et reliquerunt, quae superfuerunt, paruulis suis.

### English translation (Claude)

In the following psalm I would like this explained to me, what it means: “Their belly has been filled from your hidden things. They are sated with pork,” or, as I hear is written in some psalters, “they are sated with sons, and they have left what remained to their little ones.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 17:14 (16:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 17:14 (LXX 16:14). The variants go back to two Greek readings, ὑείων (“of swine”) and υἱῶν (“of sons”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.6 (CSEL 34.2:728; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-6).

## Letter 121.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-7
- Source: CSEL 34.2:728–729
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks why Psalm 59 prays that the Jews not be killed lest they forget the law, and suggests reasons from the honor of the law and the elect of Israel in Revelation.

### Latin text

Rursus in alio psalmo admirari soleo filium ad patrem loqui intellegens in psalmo quinquagesimo octauo, ubi de Iudaeis inimicis, de quibus supra dixerat: Ecce ipsi loquentur in ore suo et gladius in labiis eorum, paulo infra dicit: Ne occideris eos, ne quando obliuiscantur legis tuae. disperge illos in uirtute tua et destrue eos, domine. quod in his usque in hodiernum diem uidemus impleri; destructi sunt enim a ueteri sua gloria sine templo et sine sacrificiis ac sine prophetis in omnium gentium dispersione uiuentes. sed quid miramur, quod iam per prophetam pro eis non occidendis rogabat, pro quibus et sub ipso tempore passionis iam ad crucem eum ducentibus precabatur dicens: Pater, dimitte eis; non enim sciunt, quid faciunt? uerum quod adiecit: Ne umquam obliuiscantur legis tuae, tamquam propter hoc necessaria esset etiam sine fide euangelii uita eorum, obscurum mihi fateor. quid enim his ad salutem, quae sola fide quaeritur, prodest in legis memoria et meditatione uersari, nisi forte propter honorem legis ipsius uel generis Abraham, ut etiam in parte terrena carnalis seminis eius, quae uidentur secundum harenam maris computari, legis antiquae littera perseueret, ne forte aliqui legendo legem inluminentur ad fidem Christi, qui et legis et prophetarum finis est et in omnibus eorum libris praefiguratus ac prophetatus elucet? aut quia ex ipsis impiis eorum generatio uentura est electorum, qui de singulis tribubus electi in duodenis milibus signabuntur, quibus ipsa reuelatio beati Iohannis ex uoce angeli praenuntiantis hoc testimonium perhibet, quia comitatui regis aeterni familiarius adhaerebunt penitus inmaculati et humanae coniunctionis expertes? de quibus specialiter ait: Sequentur agnum, quocumque ierit, quia cum mulieribus se non coinquinauerunt; uirgines enim sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Again, in another psalm, I am accustomed to marvel, understanding that the Son is speaking to the Father in the fifty-eighth psalm, where, concerning the Jews his enemies, of whom he had said above, “Behold, they will speak with their mouth, and a sword is in their lips,” he says a little later: “Do not kill them, lest at any time they forget your law. Scatter them by your power and bring them down, O Lord.” This we see fulfilled in them to this very day; for they have been brought down from their ancient glory, living without temple, without sacrifices, and without prophets, dispersed among all nations. But why do we marvel that he was already asking through the prophet that they not be killed, when at the very time of his passion, as they were leading him to the cross, he prayed for them, saying, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing”? But what he added, “Lest they ever forget your law,” as though their life were necessary for this reason even without faith in the gospel, I confess is obscure to me. For what does it profit them toward salvation, which is sought by faith alone, to be occupied with remembering and meditating on the law? Unless perhaps it is for the honor of the law itself or of the race of Abraham, so that the letter of the ancient law may persevere even in the earthly part of his carnal seed, who seem to be counted as the sand of the sea, in case some may be enlightened by reading the law to faith in Christ, who is the end both of the law and of the prophets and shines forth, prefigured and prophesied, in all their books. Or is it because from these impious men is to come the generation of the elect, who, chosen from each tribe, will be sealed by twelve thousands, to whom the very Revelation of blessed John, from the voice of the angel foretelling it, bears this testimony, that they will cling more closely to the retinue of the eternal King, wholly undefiled and without experience of human union? Of them it says specially: “They follow the Lamb wherever he goes, because they have not defiled themselves with women; for they are virgins.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 59:7 (58:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 59:11 (58:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:34: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 10:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 7:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 14:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 59:7, 11 (LXX 58:8, 12). Paulinus's statements about the Jews are his own and are translated as written. “In case” renders ne forte, whose sense here is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.7 (CSEL 34.2:728–729; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-7).

## Letter 121.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-8
- Source: CSEL 34.2:729–730
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks about the “crown of the hair” and the “tongue of your dogs” in Psalm 68.

### Latin text

In sexagesimo sexto praeter alia illud obscurissimum mihi est, quod ait: Verum tamen deus conquassabit capita inimicorum suorum uerticem capilli perambulantium in delictis suis, quid sit uerticem capilli perambulare in delictis. non enim dixit uerticem capitis sed uerticem capilli, qui sine sensu est. an repletum peccatis hominem uult ostendere? scriptum est: Omne cor in dolore a pedibus usque ad caput. et paulo infra quod ait: Lingua canum tuorum ex inimicis ab ipso, a quo ipso? et numquid canes dei possunt dici gentiles. quos ipse in euangelio canes nominat? aut ne forte ipsos canes dei dicat. quales aestimari possunt, si qui in nomine Christiano gentiliter uiuant, quorum pars cum infidelibus ponitur, quia deum, quem uerbis colunt, factis negant?

### English translation (Claude)

In the sixty-sixth psalm, besides other things, this is most obscure to me, where it says: “But God will shatter the heads of his enemies, the crown of the hair of those who walk about in their offenses”: what it means to walk about the crown of the hair in offenses. For he did not say “the crown of the head” but “the crown of the hair,” which has no feeling. Does he mean to show a man filled with sins? It is written: “Every heart is in pain, from the feet to the head.” And a little further on, where it says, “The tongue of your dogs from the enemies, by himself”: by whom himself? And can the Gentiles be called God's dogs, whom he himself calls dogs in the gospel? Or perhaps he calls God's dogs those who may be considered such, if any live like Gentiles under the Christian name, whose portion is set with the unbelievers, because they deny by their deeds the God whom they worship in words?

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:21 (67:22 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 68:23 (67:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 1:5: quotation, medium confidence
- Matt 15:26: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 12:46: allusion, high confidence
- Titus 1:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Paulinus calls it the sixty-sixth psalm; it is Ps 68:21, 23 (LXX 67:22, 24).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.8 (CSEL 34.2:729–730; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-8).

## Letter 121.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-9
- Source: CSEL 34.2:730–731
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine to distinguish the apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers of Ephesians 4:11, especially pastors from teachers.

### Latin text

Haec interim de psalmis; nunc et de apostolo quodcumque proponam. dicit ad Ephesios, quod in alia epistula dixerat de gradibus uel ordinibus dispositionum dei operante spiritu sancto diuisiones gratiarum: Et quosdam quidem dedit apostolos, quosdam autem prophetas, alios uero euangelistas, alios autem pastores et doctores ad consummationem sanctorum et reliqua. hoc opto distinguas mihi in hac diuersitate nominum, quae sit cuique nomini officiorum uel gratiarum proprietas, quid proprium sit apostolorum, quid prophetarum, quid euangelistarum, quid pastorum quidue doctorum. in omnibus enim his diuersis nominibus simile et prope unum doctrinae officium uideo fuisse tractatum. hos autem prophetas, quos post apostolos posuit, non puto illos esse, qui ordine temporum ante apostolos fuerunt, sed istos, quibus iam sub apostolis per gratiam donabatur aut interpretatio scripturarum et inspectio mentium aut praedictio temporis secuturi, ut Agabus cernebat, qui et famem instantem praedixit et, quae beatus Paulus in Hierosolymis passurus esset, et uerbo denuntiauit et signo zonae eius ostendit. inter pastores specialiter et doctores quid intersit, dinoscere uolo, quia praepositis ecclesiae utrumque nomen adscribi solet.

### English translation (Claude)

So much for the psalms for now; now I will put forward something from the apostle too. He says to the Ephesians what he had said in another letter about the grades or orders of God's dispositions, the divisions of graces at work by the Holy Spirit: “And he gave some as apostles, some as prophets, others as evangelists, others as pastors and teachers, for the perfecting of the saints,” and so on. I wish you would distinguish for me, in this diversity of names, what property of office or grace belongs to each name: what is proper to apostles, what to prophets, what to evangelists, what to pastors, and what to teachers. For under all these different names I see a similar, almost single office of teaching treated. And I do not think that the prophets whom he placed after the apostles are those who in the order of time came before the apostles, but those to whom, already under the apostles, there was given by grace either the interpretation of the Scriptures and insight into minds, or the foretelling of the time to come, as Agabus discerned, who both foretold the coming famine and announced in words, and showed by the sign of Paul's belt, what blessed Paul would suffer at Jerusalem. I want to discern what the difference is, especially between pastors and teachers, because both names are usually given to those set over the church.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 12:4: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:28: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:11: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:12: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 11:28: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 21:11: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.9 (CSEL 34.2:730–731; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-9).

## Letter 121.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-10
- Source: CSEL 34.2:731
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks how the four kinds of prayer in 1 Timothy 2:1 differ.

### Latin text

Item, quod ait ad Timotheum: Obsecro igitur primum omnium fieri obsecrationes, orationes, postulationes, gratiarum actiones pro omnibus hominibus, quaeso exponas mihi, quod discrimen sit in hac diuersitate uerborum, cum omnia mihi, quae gerenda dixit, orationis officio conuenire uideantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise, what he says to Timothy: “I urge, then, first of all, that supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings be made for all men”: I ask you to explain to me what distinction there is in this diversity of words, since everything he said must be done seems to me to belong to the office of prayer.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:1: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.10 (CSEL 34.2:731; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-10).

## Letter 121.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-11
- Source: CSEL 34.2:731–732
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks how the Jews can be both enemies for the Gentiles' sake and beloved for the sake of the fathers, as Romans 11:28 says.

### Latin text

Item, quod ad Romanos ait, interrogo et rogo, ut edisseras mihi; multum enim caecutire me fateor in hac apostoli sententia de Iudaeis, quod ait: Secundum euangelium quidem inimici propter uos, secundum electionem autem carissimi propter patres. quo modo idem et inimici propter nos, qui credidimus ex gentibus, tamquam non potuerint gentes credere, nisi Iudaei non credidissent? aut ipse unus omnium creator deus, qui omnes homines saluos fieri uult et in agnitionem ueritatis uenire, capax non fuit adquisitionis utriusque, nisi alterum pro altero possideret? deinde carissimi propter patres quo modo aut unde carissimi, si non credant et inimici deo esse persistant? nonne, inquit, qui oderant te, deus, oderam illos et super inimicos tuos tabescebam? perfecto odio oderam illos. certe hoc puto paterna uox loquitur ad filium per prophetam in eodem psalmo, ubi supra de parte credentium dixerat: Mihi autem nimis honorificati sunt amici tui, deus, nimis confortati sunt principatus eorum. quid autem illis prodest ad salutem, quae non nisi per fidem et gratiam Christi capitur, si propter patres carissimi deo sint? cui bono diliguntur, quos necesse est propter hoc damnari, quod propter suam infidelitatem a prophetarum et patriarcharum parentum fide discrepantes inimici sunt euangelio Christi? si ergo carissimi deo, quo modo peribunt? et si non credunt, quo modo non peribunt? si propter patres sine suo merito diliguntur, quo modo et propter patres non saluabuntur? sed etsi fuerint Noe, Danihel et Iob in medio eorum, filios impios non saluabunt, soli salui erunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise, I ask and beg you to expound to me what he says to the Romans; for I confess that I am quite blind in this saying of the apostle about the Jews: “As regards the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.” How are they both enemies for our sake, we who believed from among the Gentiles, as though the Gentiles could not have believed unless the Jews had refused to believe? Or was the one God, creator of all, who wills all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth, unable to gain both unless he possessed the one in place of the other? Then, “beloved for the sake of the fathers”: how or why beloved, if they do not believe and persist in being enemies to God? “Did I not,” it says, “hate those who hated you, O God, and waste away over your enemies? I hated them with perfect hatred.” Certainly I think this is the voice of the Father speaking to the Son through the prophet in the same psalm where above he had said of the part that believes: “But to me your friends are greatly honored, O God; their rule is greatly strengthened.” And what does it profit them toward salvation, which is obtained only through faith and the grace of Christ, if they are beloved by God for the sake of the fathers? For what good are they loved, who must be condemned for this very reason, that because of their unbelief, departing from the faith of their parents the prophets and patriarchs, they are enemies of the gospel of Christ? If, then, they are beloved by God, how will they perish? And if they do not believe, how will they not perish? If they are loved for the sake of the fathers without any merit of their own, how will they not also be saved for the sake of the fathers? But even if Noah, Daniel, and Job were in their midst, they will not save impious sons; they alone will be saved.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 139:21 (138:21 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 139:22 (138:22 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 139:17 (138:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 14:14: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 14:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 139:17, 21–22 (LXX 138). Paulinus's question is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.11 (CSEL 34.2:731–732; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-11).

## Letter 121.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-12
- Source: CSEL 34.2:732–733
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks what Colossians 2:18 means by the “religion of angels,” suggesting it refers to heretics who teach doctrines of demons.

### Latin text

Adhuc aliud obscurius mihi erue de profundo et in uadum profer. in epistula Colossensium omnino colligere non possum, quod ait: Nemo uos seducat uolens in humilitate et religione angelorum, quae non uidit ambulans frustra inflatus sensu carnis suae et non tenens caput. de quibus angelis dicit? si de inimicis et malis, quae illorum religio aut quae humilitas et qui sit magister seductionis huius, qui per obtentum nescio cuius angelicae religionis quasi uisa et comperta doceat, quae non uidit? sine dubio haeretici, qui doctrinas daemoniorum et sequuntur et promunt, conceptis ab eorum spiritu adinuentionibus, quae non uiderunt phantasmata, quasi uisa fingentes et pestiferis disputationibus in corda male credula seminantes hi sunt, qui non tenent caput, id est Christum fontem ueritatis, cuius doctrinae quicquid aduersatur, insanum est, et hi caeci duces caecorum, de quibus dici puto: Me dereliquerunt fontem aquae uiuae et foderunt sibi lacus contritos, qui non tenent aquam.

### English translation (Claude)

Dig up another, still more obscure passage for me from the depths and bring it into the shallows. In the letter to the Colossians I cannot make out at all what he says: “Let no one lead you astray, wishing to do so in humility and the religion of angels, walking in what he has not seen, vainly puffed up by the sense of his flesh, and not holding the head.” Of what angels does he speak? If of hostile and evil ones, what is their religion or what is their humility, and who is the master of this seduction, who under the pretext of some angelic religion teaches as though seen and ascertained what he has not seen? Without doubt the heretics, who both follow and put forth teachings of demons, inventing as though seen phantasms they have not seen, inventions conceived from the demons' spirit, and sowing them with pestilent disputations in hearts that believe wrongly: these are those who do not hold the head, that is, Christ, the source of truth, so that whatever opposes his teaching is insane; and these are blind leaders of the blind, of whom I think it is said: “They have forsaken me, the fountain of living water, and dug for themselves broken cisterns that cannot hold water.”

### Scripture references

- Col 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:1: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 15:14: allusion, high confidence
- Jer 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.12 (CSEL 34.2:732–733; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-12).

## Letter 121.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-13
- Source: CSEL 34.2:733–735
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine to explain Colossians 2:21–23, which seems to attribute wisdom and humility to superstition and to join “not sparing the body” with “satisfaction of the flesh.”

### Latin text

Deinde in subsequenti capite adiecit: Ne tetigeritis neque gustaueritis neque contrectaueritis, quae sunt omnia in interitum ipso usu secundum praecepta et doctrinas hominum rationem quidem habentia sapientiae in superstitione et humilitate ad non parcendum corpori, non in honore aliquo ad saturitatem carnis. quae sunt ista, quibus et rationem sapientiae inesse testatur magister ueritatis et tamen ipsam ueritatem religionis inesse abnegat? ne forte de talibus loquitur, de quibus ad Timotheum dicit: Habentes autem speciem pietatis, uirtutem autem eius abnegantes? rogo ergo specialiter haec capitula duo de Colossensium epistula per singula mihi uerba dissoluas, quia laudabilibus execranda permiscuit. quid enim tam laudabile quam ratio sapientiae et quid tam execrabile quam superstitio erroris? humilitas quoque et deo placita et maxime in uera religione laudabilis cum ratione sapientiae ipsis datur, de quorum doctrinis et actibus dicitur nobis: Ne tetigeritis neque gustaueritis, quae sunt in interitum, quia non sunt ex deo et omne, quod non est ex fide, peccatum est. deus autem dissipauit consilia sapientium, qui deo stulti sunt per prudentiam carnis, quae non potest legi dei esse subiecta; scit enim cogitationes hominum, quoniam uanae sunt. qualem humilitatem qualemque rationem sapientiae superstitioni hominum doctrinis uenienti inesse dicat, requiro. et quod ait: Ad non parcendum corpori, non in honore aliquo ad saturitatem carnis, prorsus haec parum intellego, quia in eadem sententia magna mihi uidetur esse discretio; arbitror enim eum de abstinentia qualibet ficta uel inutili, qualis solet ab haereticis affectari, hoc dicere ad non parcendum corpori, quod autem adiecit non in honore aliquo, quia sancti operis speciem non in fide ueritatis exercentes nullius gloriae honore uel fructu agunt, quod in magna erroris peruersi reprehensione conficiunt transfigurantes se in ministros iustitiae. sed quod adiecit ad saturitatem carnis, contrarium mihi uidetur illi, quod dicit ad non parcendum corpori; uidetur enim mihi ille non parcere corpori, qui carnem ieiuniis domat, sicut apostolus dicit: Liuidum facio corpus meum et in seruitutem redigo, a quo opere saturitas carnis aliena est, nisi forte et ipsam saturandae carnis curam, quae maxime obseruantiam religionis praetendentibus probrosa est, non parcere corpori dixit secundum illud honestatis praeceptum, quod alibi dicit, ut unusquisque suum uas honorifice possidere nouerit, ut hostiam uiuam et placentem deo suum corpus exhibeat non in saturitatem carnis, quia distentio corporis animae sobrietatem necat et inimica est castitati.

### English translation (Claude)

Then in the following passage he added: “Do not touch, nor taste, nor handle, things which all perish by their very use, according to the precepts and doctrines of men, having indeed a reason of wisdom in superstition and humility, for not sparing the body, not in any honor, for the satisfaction of the flesh.” What are these things, in which the teacher of truth testifies that there is a reason of wisdom, and yet denies that the truth of religion is in them? Is he perhaps speaking of such people as those of whom he says to Timothy, “Having the appearance of piety, but denying its power”? I ask, then, specially that you resolve for me, word by word, these two passages of the letter to the Colossians, because he has mingled execrable things with praiseworthy ones. For what is so praiseworthy as the reason of wisdom, and what so execrable as the superstition of error? Humility too, which is pleasing to God and most praiseworthy in true religion, is attributed, together with the reason of wisdom, to the very people about whose teachings and acts we are told, “Do not touch nor taste” things which perish, because they are not from God, and everything that is not from faith is sin. But God has scattered the counsels of the wise, who are foolish before God through the prudence of the flesh, which cannot be subject to the law of God; for he knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain. I ask what kind of humility and what kind of reason of wisdom he says is present in a superstition that comes from the doctrines of men. And what he says, “for not sparing the body, not in any honor, for the satisfaction of the flesh,” I understand very poorly, because there seems to me to be a great difference within the same sentence. For I think he says “for not sparing the body” of some feigned or useless abstinence such as heretics are wont to affect; and that he added “not in any honor” because, practicing the appearance of holy work not in the faith of truth, they act without the honor or fruit of any glory, which they bring about to the great reproach of their perverse error, transforming themselves into ministers of righteousness. But what he added, “for the satisfaction of the flesh,” seems to me contrary to what he says, “for not sparing the body”; for it seems to me that he does not spare the body who subdues his flesh with fasts, as the apostle says, “I bruise my body and bring it into subjection,” and satisfaction of the flesh is foreign to that work. Unless perhaps by “not sparing the body” he meant also the very care for satisfying the flesh, which is especially disgraceful in those who profess religious observance, contrary to that precept of decency which he gives elsewhere, that each should know how to possess his own vessel in honor, so as to present his body as a living sacrifice pleasing to God, not for the satisfaction of the flesh, because the distension of the body kills the sobriety of the soul and is hostile to chastity.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:22: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:23: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 8:7: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 94:11 (93:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:15: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:1: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.13 (CSEL 34.2:733–735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-13).

## Letter 121.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-14
- Source: CSEL 34.2:735–736
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks Augustine to send again, or rewrite, an earlier letter on the form of the resurrection body.

### Latin text

Restat, ut aliquid et de euangelicis locis suggeram beatitudini tuae, non quidem quanta legenti per otium occurrere solent — nec enim nunc uacabat dispersa per libros quaerere aut in reminiscendis memoriam uentilare —, sed uel pauca, quae ad horam dictationis huius in mentem ueniunt, sciscitabor. de resurrectionis forma non grandem sed plenam fidei instructione epistulam, qua secundae consultationi meae, dum Carthagini exhiemarem, rescripseras, si habes relatam in schedis, rogo, ut mittas aut certe retexas eam mihi, quod tibi facile est. nam etsi scriptura non extat, quia forte breuis epistula ut tumultuaria tibi inter libros tuos haberi spreta sit, renoua eam mihi eodem sensu promptam de thesauro cordis tui et mitte ad me inter alia responsa, quae reddes mihi, ut spero, praestante mihi ac tibi commeatum dierum Christo, ut ea, quo labor tuus in me fructificet, accipiam, secundum haec capitula scripturarum, de quibus te, qui uides quasi per deum, interrogaui, ut audiam, quid in te uel ex te mihi loquatur deus.

### English translation (Claude)

It remains for me to put to Your Blessedness something about passages of the gospels too; not as many as usually occur to one reading at leisure (for I had no time now to search for them scattered through the books or to stir up my memory to recall them), but I will ask about a few that come to mind at the hour of this dictation. Concerning the form of the resurrection, the letter, not long but full of instruction in the faith, in which you replied to my second inquiry while I was wintering at Carthage: if you have it entered in your files, I ask you to send it, or at least to compose it again for me, which is easy for you. For even if the copy does not survive, because perhaps a short letter, written in haste, was not thought worth keeping among your books, renew it for me with the same sense, drawn from the treasury of your heart, and send it to me among the other answers which, I hope, you will give me, Christ granting you and me provision of days; so that I may receive these answers, by which your labor may bear fruit in me, on these passages of Scripture about which I have questioned you, who see as through God, that I may hear what God speaks to me in you or from you.

### Translation notes

- “While I was wintering” translates the printed first person (exhiemarem); whether Paulinus or Augustine was at Carthage is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.14 (CSEL 34.2:735–736; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-14).

## Letter 121.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-15
- Source: CSEL 34.2:736–737
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks how the risen Christ, in the same body, was at first not recognized and then recognized.

### Latin text

Hoc autem rogo lucere mihi facias, quo modo uel qua ratione dominus post resurrectionem uel mulieribus, quae primae ad sepulcrum uenerunt, uel postea illis duobus in uia, deinde discipulis suis et non agnitus sit et agnitus; in eodem enim corpore resurrexit, in quo et passus est. et quo modo non eadem erat eiusdem corporis forma, quae fuerat, aut, si eadem erat, quo modo non agnoscebatur ab his, qui eam nouerant? illud uero sacramenti esse credo, quod, qui in uia ambulantibus non fuerat agnitus, in fractione panis reuelatus est. id ipsum tamen tuo sensu uolo tenere, non meo.

### English translation (Claude)

But this I ask you to make clear to me: how, or by what reasoning, the Lord after the resurrection, whether to the women who first came to the tomb, or afterward to those two on the road, then to his disciples, was both not recognized and recognized; for he rose in the same body in which he also suffered. And how was the form of the same body not the same as it had been; or, if it was the same, how was it not recognized by those who had known it? That indeed I believe to be a mystery, that he who had not been recognized by those walking on the road was revealed in the breaking of bread. Yet I want to hold this very thing according to your understanding, not mine.

### Scripture references

- John 20:14: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:16: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:31: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:35: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.15 (CSEL 34.2:736–737; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-15).

## Letter 121.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-16
- Source: CSEL 34.2:737
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus suggests that Mary was told “Do not touch me” because she did not yet recognize Christ as God by faith.

### Latin text

Et quod ad Mariam ait: Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad patrem, si comminus stantem non sinebatur adtingere, quo modo eum tangeret, cum ascendisset ad patrem, nisi forte fidei profectu et mentis ascensu, qua deus homini fit longinquus aut proximus? et illa dubitauerat de Christo, quem hortulanum putauerat; ideo fortassis audire meruit: Noli me tangere; indigna enim iudicabatur, ut tangeret manu Christum, quem necdum fide adprehenderat nec intellexerat deum, cum hortulanum putasset, de quo paulo ante ab angelis audierat: Quid quaeritis uiuentem cum mortuis? noli ergo me tangere, quia tibi nondum ascendi ad patrem, cui adhuc tantum homo uideor; postea me tanges, cum ad agnoscendum me credendo conscenderis.

### English translation (Claude)

And what he said to Mary, “Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father”: if she was not allowed to touch him when he was standing close by, how would she touch him when he had ascended to the Father, unless perhaps by progress in faith and ascent of mind, by which God becomes far from or near to a person? And she had been in doubt about Christ, whom she had thought to be the gardener; perhaps that is why she deserved to hear, “Do not touch me”; for she was judged unworthy to touch with her hand Christ, whom she had not yet grasped by faith nor understood to be God, since she had thought him the gardener, he of whom she had heard from the angels a little before, “Why do you seek the living among the dead?” “Do not touch me, then, because for you I have not yet ascended to the Father, you to whom I still seem only a man; afterward you will touch me, when you have ascended by believing to recognize me.”

### Scripture references

- John 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- John 20:15: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:5: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.16 (CSEL 34.2:737; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-16).

## Letter 121.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-17
- Source: CSEL 34.2:737–740
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus asks whether Simeon's prophecy of a sword piercing Mary's soul refers to her grief at the cross, where Christ entrusted her to John.

### Latin text

De illis etiam beatissimi Symeonis uerbis quid sentias, edissere mihi, ut sequar sensum tuum, quibus, cum ad uidendum ex oraculo dei Christum agente spiritu uenisset in templum et acceptum sinu benedixisset infantem dominum. ait ad Mariam: Ecce hic positus est in ruinam et resurrectionem multorum in Israhel et in signum, cui contradicetur; et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius, ut reuelentur multorum cordium cogitationes. numquid de passione Mariae, quae nusquam scripta est, hoc prophetasse credendus est? an uero de materno eius affectu, quo postea in tempore passionis adsistens cruci, qua hoc erat fixum, quod ipsa pepererat, maternorum uiscerum dolore confixa est et animam illius illa, quae eius secundum carnem filium ipsa spectante confoderat, crucis rumphea penetrabat? uideo enim et in psalmis de Ioseph ita dictum: Humiliauerunt in compedibus pedes eius; ferrum pertransiit animam eius, sicut euangelio dixit Symeon: Et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius. non ait (carnem) sed animam, in qua pietatis affectio continetur et doloris aculeus quasi gladius operatur, cum aut aliqua carnis suae iniuria afficitur, ut Ioseph, qui non mortis sed iniuriarum pertulit passiones in seruum uenditus et in reum uinculatus et carceri datus, aut cum affectionis internae tristitia uel dolore cruciatur, ut in Maria, quam utique ad crucem domini, in quo tunc sui tantum corporis filium cogitabat, materna mens duxerat, ut, cum eum uidisset mortuum, humana infirmitate lugeret sepeliendumque colligeret nihil sibi de ipsius resurrectione praesumens, qua subsecuturae admirationis fidem in oculis posita passionis poena caecabat, quamuis eandem adstantem cruci suae dominus non morientis infirmitate trepidans consolatus sit, sed ipsam, qua obibat uolens, in potestatem habens mortem plena uirtute uiuentis et constantia resurrecturi de cruce admonet dicens de apostolo beato Iohanne: Mulier, ecce filius tuus itemque illi ibidem consistenti: Ecce mater tua. iam scilicet ab humana fragilitate, qua erat natus ex femina, per crucis mortem demigrans in aeternitatem dei, ut esset in gloria dei patris, delegat homini iura pietatis humanae et ex discipulis suis adulescentior adulescentiorem elegit, ut conuenienter adsignet uirgini apostolo uirginem matrem duo pariter in eadem sententia docens, formam pietatis relinquens nobis, cum est de matre sollicitus, ut, quam relinquebat corpore, non relinqueret cura sed nec corpore relicturus, quia, quem uidebat morientem, mox erat uisura rediuiuum, et illud, quod ad fidem omnium pertineret, salutiferum pietatis suae sacramentum arcana diuini ratione consilii sub hac uoce designans, ut et alii matrem delegaret pro matre habendam et uice sua consolandam atque illi uicissim nouum filium uice corporis sui traderet, immo, ut ita dixerim, gigneret, quo ostenderet eam praeter se, qui ex ea uirgine natus esset, nec habuisse filium nec habere, quia nec saluator tantopere curam de solatio eius habuisset, si illi unicus non fuisset.

### English translation (Claude)

Explain to me also what you think about those words of most blessed Simeon, so that I may follow your understanding. When he had come into the temple, moved by the Spirit according to God's oracle, to see Christ, and had taken the infant Lord in his arms and blessed him, he said to Mary: “Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that will be spoken against; and a sword will pierce through your own soul, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.” Is he to be believed to have prophesied this of a martyrdom of Mary, which is nowhere recorded? Or rather of her maternal affection, by which afterward, at the time of the passion, as she stood by the cross on which was fixed the one she had borne, she was pierced through with the pain of a mother's heart, and the sword of the cross, which had pierced her son according to the flesh before her very eyes, penetrated her soul? For I see that in the psalms too it is said of Joseph, “They humbled his feet in fetters; iron passed through his soul,” just as Simeon said in the gospel, “And a sword will pierce through your own soul.” He does not say “flesh” but “soul,” in which the affection of love is contained and the sting of pain works like a sword: either when someone is affected by some injury to his flesh, like Joseph, who suffered not death but the sufferings of injuries, sold as a slave, bound as a criminal, and put in prison; or when someone is tortured by the sadness or pain of inward affection, as in Mary, whom her mother's heart had surely led to the Lord's cross, in whom she was then thinking only of the son of her body; so that, when she had seen him dead, she mourned with human weakness and gathered him up for burial, presuming nothing for herself about his resurrection, faith in which, the wonder that was to follow, was blinded by the suffering of the passion set before her eyes. And yet the Lord, not trembling with the weakness of a dying man, consoled her as she stood by his cross, but, holding in his power the very death to which he was going willingly, with the full strength of one who lives and the constancy of one who was to rise again, he admonishes her from the cross, saying of the blessed apostle John, “Woman, behold your son,” and likewise to him as he stood there, “Behold your mother.” That is, departing now through the death of the cross from the human frailty by which he was born of a woman into the eternity of God, so as to be in the glory of God the Father, he delegates to a man the rights of human devotion; and, being young himself, he chose the younger of his disciples, so as fittingly to assign the virgin mother to the virgin apostle. He teaches two things together in the same saying. He leaves us a pattern of devotion, since he is concerned for his mother, so that he would not leave in his care her whom he was leaving in body (though he was not going to leave her even in body, since the one she saw dying she would soon see alive again). And by the hidden reason of divine counsel he designates under this saying the saving mystery of his devotion, which concerns the faith of all: he both delegated his mother to another, to be held as a mother and comforted in his stead, and in turn handed over to her a new son in place of his own body, or rather, so to speak, begot one for her, by which he showed that she, apart from himself, who was born of her as a virgin, neither had nor has a son, since the Savior would not have taken such care for her comfort if he had not been her only son.

### Scripture references

- Luke 2:34: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 2:35: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 105:18 (104:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gen 37:28: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 39:20: allusion, high confidence
- John 19:25: allusion, high confidence
- John 19:26: quotation, high confidence
- John 19:27: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 105:18 (LXX 104:18). Paulinus's inference from John 19:26–27 that Mary had no other son is his own and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.17 (CSEL 34.2:737–740; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-17).

## Letter 121.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-18
- Source: CSEL 34.2:740–742
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulinus suggests that the sword of Simeon's prophecy is the word of God, and asks how it relates to the revealing of the thoughts of many hearts.

### Latin text

Sed redeamus ad uerba Symeonis, in quorum clausula intellectum meum caligare fateor: Et tuam, inquit, animam pertransibit framea uel gladius, ut reuelentur multorum cordium cogitationes. secundum litteram hoc mihi penitus obscurum est, quia nec Mariam beatissimam usquam legimus occisam, ut de corporali gladio sanctus ille ei futuram passionem prophetasse uideatur. sed quod subiecit: ut reuelentur multorum cordium cogitationes -.scrutans, enim inquit, corda et renes deus —, et de futuro iudicio apostolus ait, quia tunc manifestabit deus operta cordium et occulta tenebrarum. itidemque apostolus spiritaliter exprimens arma caelestia, quibus in interiori nostro debeamus armari, gladium spiritus dicit uerbum dei, de quo ad Hebraeos ait: Viuus est sermo dei et efficax et penetrabilior omni gladio ancipiti, pertingens, inquit, usque ad diuisionem animae ac spiritus et reliqua, quae nosti. quid ergo mirum, si istius uerbi ignita uis et ancipitis gladii penetrabilior acies et sancti Ioseph olim et postea beatae Mariae animam pertransiuit? nam neque in illius neque in huius corpore ferrum transisse cognouimus. atque ut magis pateat ibi prophetam ferrum pro uerbi gladio posuisse, statim subsequente uersiculo ait: Sermo domini igniuit illum. sermo enim dei et ignis et gladius est uerbo ipso deo utrumque dicente de se: Ignem, enim inquit, ueni mittere in terram et quid uolo, nisi iam accendatur? item alibi dicit: Non ueni pacem mittere sed gladium. uides eum unam uim doctrinae suae diuerso ignis et gladii nomine designasse. aut quo modo Mariae inlata per gladium passio uel tribulatio praestaret? itaque hoc scire cupio: quid ad Mariam pertineret, ut reuelarentur multorum cordium cogitationes, aut ubi apparuit, quia ex eo, quod animam eius siue carnalis in ferro siue spiritalis gladius in uerbo dei pertransiuit, exinde multorum cordium cogitationes reuelatae sint? expone ergo hanc maxime de uerbis Symeonis clausulam mihi, quia lucere non dubito sanctae animae tuae, quae de interioris oculi puritate meruit inluminationem spiritus sancti, per quem scrutari et inspicere possit etiam alta dei. deus misereatur mei per orationes tuas et inluminet uultum suum super me per lucernam uerbi tui, sancte domine, beatissime frater in domino Christo unanime, magister meus in fide ueritatis et susceptor meus in uisceribus caritatis Christi.

### English translation (Claude)

But let us return to the words of Simeon, at whose close, I confess, my understanding is clouded: “And a spear,” he says, or “sword, will pierce through your soul, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.” Taken literally this is wholly obscure to me, because we nowhere read that most blessed Mary was killed, so that the holy man would seem to have prophesied a future martyrdom for her by a bodily sword. But as for what he added, “that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed”: “For God searches hearts and reins,” it says; and the apostle says of the future judgment that God will then make manifest the hidden things of hearts and the secrets of darkness. And likewise the apostle, describing spiritually the heavenly arms with which we ought to be armed in our inner self, calls the word of God the sword of the Spirit, of which he says to the Hebrews: “The word of God is living and effective, and more piercing than any two-edged sword, reaching,” he says, “even to the division of soul and spirit,” and the rest, which you know. What wonder is it, then, if the fiery power of this word, and the edge of a two-edged sword, more piercing, passed through the soul of holy Joseph long ago and afterward of blessed Mary? For we do not know that iron passed through the body of either. And to make it clearer that the prophet there put “iron” for the sword of the word, in the next verse he says, “The word of the Lord set him on fire.” For the word of God is both fire and sword, the Word, God himself, saying both of himself: “I came,” he says, “to cast fire on the earth, and what do I wish but that it be kindled?”, and likewise elsewhere, “I did not come to bring peace but a sword.” You see that he designated the one power of his teaching by the different names of fire and sword. Or how would suffering or tribulation inflicted on Mary by a sword have served that end? So this is what I desire to know: what it had to do with Mary that the thoughts of many hearts should be revealed; or where it appeared that the thoughts of many hearts were revealed as a result of either a fleshly sword of iron or the spiritual sword of the word of God passing through her soul. Explain to me, then, above all this closing clause of Simeon's words, since I do not doubt that it shines clear to your holy soul, which by the purity of its inner eye has deserved the illumination of the Holy Spirit, through whom it can search and look into even the depths of God. May God have mercy on me through your prayers, and make his face shine upon me through the lamp of your word, holy lord, most blessed brother of one mind with me in the Lord Christ, my teacher in the faith of truth and my upholder in the heart of Christ's love.

### Scripture references

- Luke 2:35: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 7:9 (7:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:17: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 4:12: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 105:19 (104:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 12:49: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:34: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:10: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 67:1 (66:2 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 119:105 (118:105 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 105:19 (LXX 104:19).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 121.18 (CSEL 34.2:740–742; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-121-18).

## Letter 122.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-122-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:742–743
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to his clergy and people at Hippo, asking them not to be saddened by his absence and urging them to persevere in good works in view of eternal life.

### Latin text

In primis peto caritatem uestram et per Iesum obsecro, ne uos mea contristet absentia corporalis. nam spiritu et cordis affectu puto uos non dubitare nullo modo me a uobis posse discedere, quamuis me amplius contristet quam forte uos ipsos, quod infirmitas mea sufficere non potest omnibus curis, quas de me exigunt membra Christi, quibus me et timor eius et caritas seruire compellit. illud enim nouerit uestra dilectio numquam me absentem fuisse licentiosa libertate sed necessaria seruitute, quae saepe sanctos fratres et collegas meos etiam labores marinos et transmarinos compulit sustinere, a quibus me semper non indeuotio mentis sed minus idonea ualitudo corporis excusauit. proinde, dilectissimi fratres, sic agite, ut, quod ait apostolus, siue adueniens et uidens uos siue absens audiam de uobis, quia statis in uno spiritu uno animo conlaborantes fidei euangelicae. si uos aliqua molestia temporalis exagitat, ipsa uos magis admonere debet, quem ad modum de illa uita cogitare debeatis, ubi sine aliquo labore uiuatis euadentes non molestas angustias temporis parui sed horrendas poenas ignis aeterni. nam si modo tanta cura, tanta intentione, tanto labore agitis, ne in aliquos cruciatus transitorios incidatis, quantum uos oportet esse sollicitos, ut sempiternas miserias fugiatis! et si mors sic timetur, quae finit temporalem laborem. quo modo timenda est, quae mittit in aeternum dolorem! et si deliciae saeculi huius breues et sordidae sic amantur, quanto uehementius futuri saeculi gaudia pura et infinita quaerenda sunt! ista cogitantes nolite esse pigri in operibus bonis, ut ad uestri seminis messem suo tempore ueniatis.

### English translation (Claude)

First of all I ask Your Charity, and beseech you through Jesus, not to let my bodily absence sadden you. For I think you do not doubt that in spirit and in the affection of my heart I can in no way depart from you, although it saddens me more, perhaps, than it does you yourselves that my weakness cannot suffice for all the cares which the members of Christ demand of me, whom both the fear of him and love compel me to serve. For let Your Love know that I have never been absent through self-indulgent freedom, but through necessary service, which has often compelled my holy brothers and colleagues to endure even labors by sea and overseas, from which not any lack of devotion in my mind but my less robust bodily health has always excused me. Therefore, dearly beloved brothers, so act that, as the apostle says, whether I come and see you or am absent, I may hear of you that you stand firm in one spirit, with one mind laboring together for the faith of the gospel. If some temporal trouble disturbs you, it ought rather to admonish you how you should think of that life where you may live without any labor, escaping not the troublesome straits of a short time but the horrible punishments of eternal fire. For if now you act with such care, such intentness, such labor not to fall into some passing torments, how anxious you ought to be to flee everlasting miseries! And if death, which ends temporal labor, is so feared, how much more is that death to be feared which sends one into eternal pain! And if the brief and sordid delights of this world are so loved, how much more vehemently are the pure and infinite joys of the world to come to be sought! Thinking of these things, do not be slothful in good works, so that you may come to the harvest of your sowing in due season.

### Scripture references

- Phil 1:27: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to the clergy and people of Hippo (named in the manuscripts' heading).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 122.1 (CSEL 34.2:742–743; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-122-1).

## Letter 122.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-122-2
- Source: CSEL 34.2:743–745
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the people of Hippo to resume their custom of clothing the poor and to store up treasure in heaven as the world's troubles increase.

### Latin text

Nuntiatum est enim mihi, quod morem uestrum de uestiendis pauperibus fueritis obliti, ad quam misericordiam, cum praesens essem, uos exhortatus sum et nunc exhortor, ne uos uincat et pigros faciat contritio mundi huius, cui talia uidetis accidere, qualia dominus et redemptor noster, qui mentiri non potest, uentura praedixit. non solum ergo non debetis minus facere opera misericordiae, sed etiam debetis amplius, quam soletis. sicut enim ad loca munitiora festinatius migrant, qui ruinam domus uident contritis parietibus imminere, sic corda Christiana quanto magis sentiunt mundi huius ruinam crebrescentibus tribulationibus propinquare, tanto magis debent bona, quae in terra recondere disponebant, in thesaurum caelestem inpigra celeritate transferre, ut, si aliqui humanus casus acciderit, gaudeat, qui de loco ruinoso emigrauit, si autem nihil tale fuerit subsecutum, non contristetur, qui quandoque moriturus inmortali domino, ad quem uenturus est, bona propria commendauit. itaque, fratres mei dilectissimi, ex eo, quod quisque habet, secundum suas uires, quas ipse nouit, facite, quod soletis, alacriore animo, quam soletis, et inter omnes saeculi huius molestias apostolicam exhortationem corda retinete, ubi ait: Dominus in proximo est; nihil solliciti fueritis. talia mihi de uobis nuntientur, quibus nouerim non propter meam praesentiam sed propter dei praeceptum, qui numquam est absens, uos solere facere, quod multis annis me praesente et aliquando etiam me absente fecistis. dominus uos in pace conseruet, dilectissimi fratres; orate pro nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

For it has been reported to me that you have forgotten your custom of clothing the poor. I exhorted you to this work of mercy when I was present, and I exhort you now, that the distress of this world, to which you see such things happening as our Lord and Redeemer, who cannot lie, foretold would come, may not overcome you and make you slothful. You ought, then, not only not to do fewer works of mercy, but even more than you are accustomed to. For just as those who see the ruin of their house threatening, with its walls cracked, move more hastily to safer places, so Christian hearts, the more they feel the ruin of this world approaching as tribulations grow more frequent, the more they ought to transfer with unwearied speed into the heavenly treasury the goods they had planned to store up on earth; so that, if some human mishap should occur, he may rejoice who moved out of a ruinous place, and if nothing of the kind follows, he may not be saddened who, being bound to die some day, has entrusted his own goods to the immortal Lord to whom he is going. Therefore, my dearly beloved brothers, from what each has, according to his means, which he himself knows, do what you are accustomed to do, with a readier mind than usual, and amid all the troubles of this world keep in your hearts the apostle's exhortation, where he says: “The Lord is near; be anxious about nothing.” Let such things be reported to me about you as will show me that you are accustomed to do, not because of my presence but because of the command of God, who is never absent, what you did for many years when I was present, and sometimes also when I was absent. May the Lord keep you in peace, dearly beloved brothers; pray for us.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 6:20: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 4:6: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 122.2 (CSEL 34.2:743–745; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-122-2).

## Letter 123.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-123-1
- Source: CSEL 34.2:745–746
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome sends Augustine a brief note about people who cling to their former error, with greetings to Alypius and Evodius.

### Latin text

Multi utroque claudicant pede et ne fractis quidem ceruicibus inclinantur habentes affectum erroris pristini, cum praedicandi eandem non habeant libertatem. sancti fratres, qui cum nostra sunt paruitate, praecipue sanctae et uenerabiles filiae tuae suppliciter te salutant. fratres tuos, dominum meum Alypium et dominum meum Euodium, ut meo nomine salutes, precor coronam tuam. capta Hierusalem tenetur a Nabuchodonosor nec Hieremiae uult audire consilia; quin potius Aegyptum desiderat, ut moriatur in Taphnes et ibi seruitute pereat sempiterna.

### English translation (Claude)

Many are lame on both feet, and do not bow even when their necks are broken, keeping their attachment to their former error though they no longer have the same freedom to preach it. The holy brothers who are with our littleness, especially your holy and venerable daughters, humbly greet you. I beg Your Crown to greet in my name your brothers, my lord Alypius and my lord Evodius. Jerusalem has been captured and is held by Nebuchadnezzar, and will not listen to the counsels of Jeremiah; rather it longs for Egypt, so as to die in Tahpanhes and perish there in everlasting slavery.

### Scripture references

- 1 Kgs 18:21: allusion, medium confidence
- Jer 43:7 (50:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Jerome. Whom his figures of speech refer to (the “former error”, the captive Jerusalem) is not stated; identification uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 123.1 (CSEL 34.2:745–746; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/121-1/#p-123-1).

## Letter 124.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-124-1
- Source: CSEL 44:746–2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Albina, Pinianus, and Melania, then at Thagaste, of his distress at being unable to visit them.

### Latin text

Cum habitu ualitudinis uel natura frigus ferre non possim, numquam tamen maiores aestus quam ista hieme tam horrenda perpeti potui, quod ad uos, ad quos uolatu maria transeunda fuerant, tam in proximo constitutos, tam de longinquo uisendi nos gratia uenientes non dicam pergere sed uolare non potui. et forsitan sanctitas uestra eandem hiemalem asperitatem poenae meae tantum causam putauerit. absit, carissimi. quid enim graue ac molestum uel etiam periculosum habent imbres isti, quod non mihi subeundum ac ferendum fuit, ut ad uos uenirem, tanta in tantis malis nostris solatia, in hac generatione tortuosa ac peruersa tam ardenter accensa de summo lumine lumina suscepta humilitate sublimia et contempta claritate clariora? simul etiam fruerer carnalis patriae meae tam spiritali felicitate, quae uos etiam praesentes habere meruit, de quibus absentibus, cum id, quod nati estis et quod gratia Christi facti estis, audiret, quamuis caritate crederet, tamen, ne non crederetur, narrare forsitan uerebatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Although, by the state of my health or by nature, I cannot bear the cold, yet never have I been able to suffer greater heat than in this most dreadful winter, because I could not (I will not say go, but fly) to you who are settled so near, and who have come from so far to see us, you to whom I ought to have flown even across the seas. And perhaps Your Holiness may have thought that this same wintry harshness was the only cause of my punishment. Far from it, dearest ones. For what is there grievous and troublesome or even dangerous in these rains that I ought not to have undergone and borne to come to you, such great comforts amid our so great evils, lights so ardently kindled from the highest Light in this crooked and perverse generation, raised high by the humility you have taken up and made more illustrious by the renown you have despised? At the same time I would have enjoyed the so spiritual happiness of my earthly homeland, which has been found worthy to have you present too: you of whom, when you were absent, it hesitated perhaps to speak, lest it not be believed, though it believed out of love when it heard what you were by birth and what by the grace of Christ you have become.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Albina, her son-in-law Pinianus, and her daughter Melania the Younger (named in the manuscripts' heading). “Heat” plays on the burning of anxiety.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 124.1 (CSEL 44:746–2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-124-1).

## Letter 124.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-124-2
- Source: CSEL 44:2–3
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the distress of his people at Hippo, already troubled by his absence, kept him from visiting.

### Latin text

Dicam igitur, quare non uenerim et quibus malis a tanto bono impeditus sum, ut non solum a uobis ueniam sed etiam uestris orationibus ab illo, qui in uobis, quod ei uiuitis, operatur, merear misericordiam. populus Hipponiensis, cui me dominus seruum dedit, cum ex magna ac pene ex omni parte ita infirmus sit, ut pressura etiam leuioris tribulationis possit grauiter aegrotare, nunc tam magna tribulatione caeditur, ut, etiam si non sic esset infirmus, uix eam cum aliqua salute animi sustineret. eum autem, cum modo regressus sum, periculosissime scandalizatum comperi de absentia mea; uestris autem, de quorum spiritali robore gaudemus in domino, sanis utique faucibus sapit quo modo dictum sit: Quis infirmatur et ego non infirmor? quis scandalizatur et ego non uror? praesertim quoniam multi sunt hic, qui detrahendo nobis ceterorum animas, a quibus diligi uidemur, aduersus nos perturbare conantur, ut locum in eis diabolo faciant. cum autem irascuntur nobis, de quorum salute satagimus, magnum illis consilium uindicandi est libido moriendi non in corpore sed in corde, ubi funus occulte prius suo putore sentitur, quam nostra cogitatione prospicitur. huic meae sollicitudini procul dubio libenter ignoscitis, praesertim quoniam, si suscenseretis et uelletis ulcisci, nihil fortasse grauius inueniretis, quam id, quod patior, cum uos Tagastae non uideo. spero autem uestris adiutus orationibus, quod mihi ad uos, ubicumque in Africa fueritis, uenire quantocius concedetur, cum hoc, quo nunc detentus sum, praeterierit, si haec ciuitas, in qua laboramus, digna non est, quia nec ego audeo dignam putare, quae nobiscum de uestra praesentia conlaetetur.

### English translation (Claude)

I will say, then, why I did not come and by what evils I was kept from so great a good, so that I may deserve not only your pardon but also, through your prayers, mercy from him who works in you, so that you live for him. The people of Hippo, to whom the Lord has given me as a servant, being for the most part, almost wholly, so weak that the pressure of even a lighter tribulation could make them gravely ill, are now beaten by so great a tribulation that, even if they were not so weak, they would scarcely bear it with any health of soul. And when I returned just now, I found them most dangerously offended by my absence; and to your healthy palates, whose spiritual strength we rejoice in in the Lord, the meaning of this saying is surely clear: “Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?” Especially since there are many here who, by disparaging us, try to stir up against us the souls of others by whom we seem to be loved, so as to make room in them for the devil. And when those whose salvation we labor for are angry with us, their great plan of revenge is the desire to die, not in body but in heart, where the corpse is first perceived secretly by its stench before our thought can foresee it. You will surely gladly pardon this anxiety of mine, especially since, if you were angry and wished to take revenge, you would perhaps find nothing more grievous than what I suffer in not seeing you at Thagaste. But I hope, helped by your prayers, that I shall be allowed to come to you as soon as possible, wherever in Africa you may be, when this matter by which I am now detained has passed; that is, if this city in which we labor is not worthy (for I do not dare to think it worthy) to rejoice with us in your presence.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:27: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 124.2 (CSEL 44:2–3; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-124-2).

## Letter 125.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-1
- Source: CSEL 44:3
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Alypius that the suspicion that they sought Pinianus's wealth is more grievous than the people's insults.

### Latin text

Dolemus quidem grauiter nec fieri potest, ut parui pendamus, quod in iniurias sanctitatis tuae populus Hipponiensis tanta clamauit; sed multo grauius dolendum est, frater bone, talia de nobis existimari quam illa clamari. quando enim nos credimur cupiditate pecuniae, non dilectione iustitiae seruos dei uelle retinere, nonne optandum est, ut, qui hoc credunt, occultum cordis sui uoce testentur ac sic aliqua, si fieri potest, tanto maiora remedia requirantur, quam ut taciti pereant perniciosis suspicionibus uenenati? quapropter magis satagendum est, unde, etiam priusquam hoc fieret, locuti sumus, quo modo persuadeatur hominibus, quibus nos ad exemplum bonorum operum praebere praecipimur, falsum esse, quod suspicantur, quam quo modo arguendi sint, qui suspiciones suas uocibus uerbisque declarant.

### English translation (Claude)

We do indeed grieve deeply, and we cannot make light of it, that the people of Hippo shouted such things to the injury of Your Holiness; but it is much more to be grieved over, good brother, that such things should be thought of us than that those things should be shouted. For when it is believed that we wish to keep servants of God among us out of greed for money, not out of love of righteousness, is it not to be wished that those who believe this should declare aloud what is hidden in their hearts, so that, if possible, remedies as much greater may be sought, rather than that they perish in silence, poisoned by pernicious suspicions? Therefore we must be more concerned (as we said even before this happened) about how to persuade people, to whom we are commanded to offer ourselves as an example of good works, that what they suspect is false, than about how to rebuke those who declare their suspicions in cries and words.

### Scripture references

- Titus 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Alypius, bishop of Thagaste, about the attempt of the people of Hippo to have Pinianus ordained.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 125.1 (CSEL 44:3; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-1).

## Letter 125.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-2
- Source: CSEL 44:3–5
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine judges that Albina and her family should be healed of their suspicion of the clergy's greed, and urges Alypius that they take care to be above reproach before men.

### Latin text

Proinde ego sanctae Albinae non suscenseo nec arguendam iudico sed a tali suspicione sanandam. quae quia non in meam personam eadem uerba direxit, sed tamquam de Hipponiensibus questa est, quod aperuerint cupiditatem suam, se non clericatus sed pecuniae causa hominem diuitem atque huius modi pecuniae contemptorem et largitorem apud se tenere uoluisse, tamen, quid de nobis senserit, paene clamauit nec ipsa tantum uerum etiam sancti filii eius, qui hoc etiam ipsa die in abside dixerunt. hos ergo, ut dixi, magis sanandos ab huius modi suspicionibus quam propter has arguendos existimo. ubi enim nobis a spinis talibus securitas et requies praeparari uel praeberi potest, si aduersus nos in tam sanctis nobisque carissimis cordibus nostris pullulare potuere? de te quippe inperitum uulgus hoc sensit, de nobis lumina ecclesiae; unde, quid magis dolendum sit, uides. utrumque autem non accusandum censeo sed sanandum; homines enim sunt et de hominibus talia licet falsa non tamen incredibilia suspicantur. nam utique non usque adeo desipiunt tales homines, ut credant populum suam desiderare pecuniam praesertim iam experti, quod nihil ex ea populus Tagastensis accepit — sic ergo et Hipponiensis —; uerum omnis haec inuidia non nisi in clericos aestuat maximeque in episcopos, quorum uidetur praeminere dominatus, qui uti fruique rebus ecclesiae tamquam possessores et domini existimantur. ad istam cupiditatem tam noxiam atque mortiferam, si fieri potest, meus Alypi, non aedificentur per nos infirmi. recordare, quid locuti fuerimus, antequam ista temptatio, quae plus ad hoc cogit, accideret. ex hoc potius conferendo adiuuante domino prouidere conemur nec nobis sufficiat nostra conscientia, quia non talis causa est, ubi debeat sola sufficere. si enim serui dei non reprobi sumus, si aliquid uiget in nobis illius igniculi, quo caritas non quaerit, quae sua sunt, prouidere utique debemus bona non solum coram deo sed etiam coram hominibus, ne tranquillam aquam bibentes in nostra conscientia pedibus incautis agere conuincamur, ut oues dominicae turbidam bibant.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, I am not angry with holy Albina, nor do I judge that she should be rebuked, but that she should be healed of such a suspicion. She did not direct these words against me personally, but complained, as it were, about the people of Hippo, that they had revealed their greed by wishing to keep with them a rich man, who despised and gave away such wealth, not for the sake of clerical office but for the sake of money; yet what she thought of us she almost shouted aloud; and not she only, but also her holy children, who said this even on that very day in the apse. These, then, as I said, I think should be healed of such suspicions rather than rebuked for them. For where can security and rest from such thorns be prepared or given us, if they could sprout up against us in hearts so holy and so dear to us? About you it was the ignorant crowd that thought this; about us, the lights of the church: so you see which is more to be grieved over. But I think neither should be accused; both should be healed. For they are human beings and suspect such things of human beings, things false, yet not incredible. For certainly such people are not so foolish as to believe that the people desire their money, especially when they have already found that the people of Thagaste received nothing of it (and so too the people of Hippo); rather, all this resentment seethes only against the clergy, and most of all against bishops, whose dominion appears preeminent, and who are thought to use and enjoy the property of the church as owners and masters. To this greed, so harmful and deadly, let the weak not be encouraged by us, my Alypius, if it can be helped. Remember what we said before this temptation occurred, which presses us all the more to this. Let us rather try, by conferring together with the Lord's help, to make provision for it, and let our own conscience not be enough for us, for this is not a case where it alone ought to suffice. For if we are servants of God who are not reprobate, if any of that little spark is alive in us by which love does not seek its own, we ought certainly to provide what is good not only before God but also before men, lest, drinking calm water in our own conscience, we be shown to walk with careless feet, so that the Lord's sheep drink muddied water.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:10: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 8:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Ezek 34:18: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 34:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Her holy children”: her son-in-law Pinianus and her daughter Melania.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 125.2 (CSEL 44:3–5; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-2).

## Letter 125.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-3
- Source: CSEL 44:5–6
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the idea that Pinianus's oath, given under the crowd's pressure, could lawfully be broken, citing Regulus and the Roman censors.

### Latin text

Nam quod scripsisti, de genere iurationis uiolenter extortae ut inter nos requiramus, obsecro te, ne res lucidissimas disputatio nostra faciat obscuras. si enim certa mors intentaretur, ut aliquid inlicitum ac nefarium seruus dei se iuraret esse facturum, mori malle quam iurare debuerat, ne iurationem scelere impleret. nunc uero, cum tantum modo populi perseuerantissimus clamor ad nullum nefas hominem cogeret sed ad id, quod, si fieret, licite fieret, cumque metueretur quidem, ne aliqui perditi, qui multitudini etiam bonorum plerumque miscentur, occasione seditionis et quasi iustae indignationis inuenta in aliquam uim sceleratam rapinarum cupiditate prorumperent, sed tamen illud, quod metuebatur, esset incertum, quis censeat propter incerta non dico damna et quaslibet iniurias corporales sed propter ipsam mortem cauendam certum periurium debere committi? nescio quis ille Regulus nihil in scripturis sanctis de impietate falsae iurationis audierat, nihil de Zachariae falce didicerat et nimirum Carthaginensibus non per sacramenta Christi sed per daemonum inquinamenta iurauerat et tamen certissimos cruciatus et horrendi exempli mortem non, ut iuraret necessitate, pertimuit, sed libera uoluntate, quia iurauerat, ne peieraret, excepit. et Romana tunc illa censura noluit habere non in numero sanctorum sed in numero senatorum nec in caelesti gloria sed in terrestri curia non solum eos, qui metu mortis crudeliumque poenarum apertissime peierare quam ad immanes hostes remeare maluerunt, sed etiam illum, qui reatu periurii se putauerat absolutum, quia post iurationem ficta nescio qua necessitate redierat. ita non adtenderunt, qui eum senatu pepulerunt, quid ipse iurando cogitasset, sed quid ab illo, quibus iurauerat, expectarent. nec legerant, quod nos usquequaque cantamus: Qui iurat proximo suo et non decipit. solemus haec quamuis in hominibus a Christi gratia et nomine alienis cum ingenti admiratione laudare; et adhuc in libris diuinis inquirendum putamus, utrum aliquando licite peieremus, ubi nobis, ne iurandi facilitate in periurium prolabamur, etiam praeceptum est, ne iuremus?

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you wrote, that we should inquire between ourselves about the kind of oath extorted by violence, I beg you, let not our discussion make most clear things obscure. For if certain death were threatened to make a servant of God swear that he would do something unlawful and wicked, he ought to prefer to die rather than to swear, lest he fulfill his oath by a crime. But in this case only the most persistent shouting of the people was compelling the man, and not to any wickedness but to something that, if done, would be done lawfully; and though it was indeed feared that some abandoned men, who are often mixed in with a multitude even of good people, having found an occasion for sedition and, as it were, for just indignation, might break out into some criminal violence from lust for plunder, still what was feared was uncertain. Who would think that, because of uncertain things, I do not say losses or any bodily injuries, but even to escape death itself, a certain perjury ought to be committed? That Regulus, whoever he was, had heard nothing in the holy Scriptures about the impiety of false swearing, had learned nothing about the sickle of Zechariah, and of course had sworn to the Carthaginians not by the sacraments of Christ but by the defilements of demons; and yet he did not dread most certain tortures and a death of horrible example so as to swear out of necessity, but of his own free will, because he had sworn, he accepted them so as not to perjure himself. And the Roman censorship of that time refused to keep, not among the number of saints but among the number of senators, not in heavenly glory but in the earthly senate house, not only those who, from fear of death and cruel punishments, most openly chose to perjure themselves rather than return to their savage enemies, but also the one who had thought himself absolved from the guilt of perjury because, after the oath, he had gone back on some feigned pretext. So those who expelled him from the senate considered not what he himself had in mind when he swore, but what those to whom he had sworn expected of him. Nor had they read what we sing everywhere: “He who swears to his neighbor and does not deceive.” We are accustomed to praise these things with great admiration even in men who were strangers to the grace and name of Christ; and do we still think we must inquire in the divine books whether we may ever lawfully perjure ourselves, where we have even been commanded not to swear, lest by readiness to swear we slip into perjury?

### Scripture references

- Zech 5:1: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 15:4 (14:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:34: allusion, high confidence
- Jas 5:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Off. 3.99-115 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The stories of Regulus and of the prisoners who broke their oaths after Cannae are told by Cicero, On Duties 3.99–115. The “sickle” of Zech 5:1–2 follows the Greek (LXX) reading.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 125.3 (CSEL 44:5–6; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-3).

## Letter 125.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-4
- Source: CSEL 44:6–7
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that an oath binds according to the known expectation of those to whom it is sworn, so Pinianus may travel but must keep his promise to reside at Hippo.

### Latin text

Illud sane rectissime dici non ambigo, non secundum uerba iurantis sed secundum expectationem illius, cui iuratur, quam nouit ille, qui iurat, fidem iurationis impleri.. nam uerba difficillime comprehendunt maxime breuiter sententiam, cuius a iurante fides exigitur. unde periuri sunt, qui seruatis uerbis expectationem eorum, quibus iuratum est, deceperunt, et periuri non sunt, qui etiam uerbis non seruatis illud, quod ab eis, cum iurarent, expectatum est, impleuerunt. proinde quia Hipponienses sanctum Pinianum non sicut damnatum sed sicut carissimum inhabitatorem suae ciuitatis habere uoluerunt, etsi uerbis eius non satis comprehendi potuit, usque adeo tamen in promptu est, quid ab illo expectauerint, ut, quod nunc post iurationem absens est, neminem moueat eorum, qui audire potuerunt certa eum causa profecturum esse cum uoluntate redeundi. ac per hoc periurus nec erit nec ab eis putabitur, nisi eorum expectationem deceperit; non autem decipiet, nisi aut uoluntatem mutauerit apud eos habitandi aut aliquando discesserit sine dispositione redeundi, quod absit ab eius moribus et fide, quam Christo et ecclesiae debitam seruat. nam ut omittam, quod mecum nosti, quam sit tremendum de periurio diuinum iudicium, illud certe scio, nulli nos deinceps suscensere debere, qui nobis iurantibus non crediderit, si talis uiri periurium non modo aequo animo ferendum uerum etiam defendendum putabimus. quod et a nobis et ab illo auertat illius misericordia, qui eruit a temptatione sperantes in se. sicut ergo in commonitorio rescripsisti, impleat promissum, quod ita se promisit ab Hippone non recessurum, quem ad modum ego uel ipsi Hipponienses non recedimus, quibus tamen et abeundi et redeundi facultas est libera, nisi quod his, qui iuratione non detinentur, etiam omnino et migrandi et non redeundi sine periurii reatu potestas est.

### English translation (Claude)

This indeed I do not doubt is said most rightly: that the faith of an oath is fulfilled not according to the words of the one who swears, but according to the expectation of the one to whom it is sworn, which the one who swears knows. For words very seldom capture, especially in a few words, the meaning whose faithful observance is required of the one who swears. Hence those are perjurers who, while keeping the words, have deceived the expectation of those to whom they swore; and those are not perjurers who, even without keeping the words, have fulfilled what was expected of them when they swore. Accordingly, since the people of Hippo wished to have holy Pinianus not as a condemned man but as a most dear resident of their city, even if this could not be sufficiently captured in his words, yet what they expected of him is so evident that his present absence after the oath disturbs none of those who could hear that he was going to set out for a definite reason with the intention of returning. And so he will not be a perjurer, nor be thought one by them, unless he deceives their expectation; and he will not deceive it unless he either changes his intention of living among them or someday departs without arranging to return, which be far from his character and from the faith which he keeps as due to Christ and the church. For, to pass over how terrible the divine judgment on perjury is, which you know as well as I do, this I certainly know: that henceforth we ought to be angry with no one who does not believe us when we swear, if we think that the perjury of such a man is not only to be borne with equanimity but even defended. May the mercy of him who rescues from temptation those who hope in him turn this away both from us and from him. As you wrote back, then, in your memorandum, let him fulfill his promise, since he promised that he would not withdraw from Hippo, in the same way as I and the people of Hippo themselves do not withdraw, who nevertheless have free power both to go away and to return; except that those who are not bound by an oath also have the power to move away altogether and not return without the guilt of perjury.

### Scripture references

- 2 Pet 2:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 125.4 (CSEL 44:6–7; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-4).

## Letter 125.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-5
- Source: CSEL 44:7
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that only one monk joined the crowd's shouting, and encloses a copy of Pinianus's signed promise.

### Latin text

Clericos sane nostros uel fratres in monasterio constitutos participes uel hortatores fuisse contumeliarum tuarum utrum probari possit, ignoro. nam cum hoc quaesissem, dictum est unum tantum modo Carthaginensem de monasterio clamasse cum populo, cum illum presbyterum peterent, non cum in te indigna iactarent adiunxi huic epistulae ipsius promissionis exemplum ex chartula eadem translatum, quam ipse subscripsit, et me inspiciente emendatum.

### English translation (Claude)

Whether it can be proved that our clergy or the brothers living in the monastery took part in or incited the insults against you, I do not know. For when I had inquired about this, I was told that only one, a Carthaginian from the monastery, had shouted with the people, when they were demanding him as presbyter, not when they were hurling unworthy things at you. I have attached to this letter a copy of the promise itself, transcribed from the very paper which he signed, and checked under my inspection.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 125.5 (CSEL 44:7; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-125-5).

## Letter 126.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-1
- Source: CSEL 44:7–9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine gives Albina his account of how the crowd at Hippo demanded Pinianus as presbyter and insulted Alypius, and how he refused to break his promise.

### Latin text

Dolorem animi tui, quem te scribis explicare non posse, consolari aequum est, non augere, ut, si fieri potest, sanemus suspiciones tuas, non ut eis pro nostra causa suscensendo uenerandum cor tuum et deo dicatum amplius perturbemus. sancto fratri nostro filio tuo Piniano nullus ab Hipponiensibus metus mortis ingestus est, etiamsi forte ipse tale aliquid timuit; nam et nos metuebamus, ne ab aliquibus perditis, qui saepe multitudini occulta conspiratione miscentur, in uiolentam prorumperetur audaciam occasione seditionis inuenta, quam uelut iusta indignatione concitaret. sed, sicut post audire potuimus, nihil tale a quoquam dictum est uel molitum, sed uere in fratrem meum Alypium multa contumeliosa et indigna clamabant, a quo tam ingenti reatu utinam per illius orationes mereantur absolui. ego autem post primos eorum clamores cum eis dixissem de illo inuito non ordinando, qua iam promissione detinerer, atque adiecissem, quod, si mea fide uiolata illum haberent presbyterum, me episcopum non haberent, ad nostra subsellia relicta turba redieram. tum illi aliquantulum inopinata mea responsione cunctati atque turbati uelut flamma uento paululum pressa deinde coeperunt multo ardentius excitari existimantes fieri posse, ut uel mihi extorqueretur illud non seruare promissum uel me tenente promissi fidem ab alio episcopo ordinaretur. dicebam ego, quibus poteram, qui ad nos in absidem honoratiores et grauiores ascenderant, nec a promissi fide me posse dimoueri nec ab alio episcopo in ecclesia mihi tradita nisi me interrogato ac permittente posse ordinari; quod si permitterem, a fide nihilo minus deuiarem. addebam etiam nihil eos uelle, si ordinaretur inuitus, nisi ut ordinatus abscederet. illi hoc posse fieri non credebant. multitudo uero pro gradibus constituta horrendo et perseuerantissimo clamorum fremitu in eadem uoluntate persistens incertos animi consiliique faciebant. tunc illa in fratrem meum indigna clamabantur, tunc a nobis grauiora timebantur.

### English translation (Claude)

It is right to console, not to increase, the grief of your mind, which you write that you cannot express; so that, if possible, we may heal your suspicions, and not disturb your venerable heart, dedicated to God, still further by being angry at them on our own account. No fear of death was inflicted on our holy brother, your son Pinianus, by the people of Hippo, even if perhaps he himself feared something of the kind; for we too were afraid that some abandoned men, who often mix with a multitude in secret conspiracy, might break out into violent audacity, having found an occasion for sedition which they could stir up as if with just indignation. But, as we were able to learn afterward, nothing of the kind was said or attempted by anyone; but they did indeed shout many insulting and unworthy things against my brother Alypius, from which so great a guilt may they deserve to be absolved through his prayers. But after their first shouts, when I had told them what promise already bound me not to ordain him against his will, and had added that, if they got him as presbyter by my breaking faith, they would not have me as bishop, I had left the crowd and returned to our seats. Then they, somewhat checked and disturbed by my unexpected reply, like a flame pressed down a little by the wind, began to be stirred up much more ardently, thinking it could happen either that I might be forced not to keep that promise or that, while I kept faith with the promise, he might be ordained by another bishop. To those I could reach, the more honorable and weighty men who had come up to us in the apse, I said that I could neither be moved from keeping faith with my promise, nor could he be ordained by another bishop in the church entrusted to me unless I were asked and gave permission; and if I gave permission, I would no less be departing from my word. I added also that, if he were ordained against his will, they would get nothing except that, once ordained, he would depart. They did not believe this could happen. But the multitude standing before the steps, persisting in the same will with a horrible and most persistent roar of shouting, made them uncertain in mind and counsel. Then those unworthy things were shouted against my brother; then more serious things were feared by us.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Albina. Pinianus was her son-in-law, here called her son.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.1 (CSEL 44:7–9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-1).

## Letter 126.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-2
- Source: CSEL 44:9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he kept both his promises, neither ordaining Pinianus against his will nor urging him to accept, and could not safely leave with or without Alypius.

### Latin text

Sed quamuis tanto motu populi et tanta perturbatione ecclesiae permouerer nec aliud constipationi illi dixissem nisi eum me inuitum ordinare non posse, nec sic tamen adductus sum, quia et hoc promiseram non me fuisse facturum, ut aliquid ei de suscipiendo presbyterio suaderem; quod si persuadere potuissem, non iam ordinaretur inuitus. seruaui utriusque promissionis fidem non solum illius, quam iam populo patefeceram, uerum etiam illius, in qua uno teste, quantum ad homines adtinet, detinebar. seruaui, inquam, fidem promissionis, non iurationis in tanto periculo. quod licet falso. sicut postea comperimus, metuebatur, omnibus tamen, si quod esset, communiter inpendebat et erat metus ipse communis ac propter ecclesiam, in qua eramus, maxime metuens abscedere cogitabam. sed metuendum fuit, ne magis me absente tale aliquid faceret et reuerentia minor et dolor ardentior. deinde, si cum fratre Alypio discederem per populum constipatum, cauendum fuit, ne quisquam in eum manum mittere auderet, si autem sine illo, quae frons esset existimationis, si quid ei fortassis accideret et uiderer eum propterea deseruisse, ut furenti populo traderetur?

### English translation (Claude)

But although I was deeply moved by so great an agitation of the people and so great a disturbance of the church, and had said nothing else to that crowd than that I could not ordain him against his will, still I was not induced to urge him in any way to accept the presbyterate, because I had promised that I would not do this either; and if I had been able to persuade him, he would no longer have been ordained against his will. I kept faith with both promises: not only the one I had already made known to the people, but also the one by which I was bound with only one witness, as far as men are concerned. I kept faith, I say, with a promise, not an oath, in so great a danger. Although, as we found out afterward, it was falsely feared, yet the danger, if there was any, hung over all of us in common, and the fear itself was common; and I thought of withdrawing, fearing most for the church in which we were. But it was to be feared that in my absence less reverence and more burning resentment might bring about something of the kind. Then, if I departed with brother Alypius through the packed crowd, care had to be taken lest anyone dare to lay hands on him; but if I departed without him, how would my reputation look, if something happened to him and I seemed to have deserted him so that he might be handed over to the raging people?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.2 (CSEL 44:9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-2).

## Letter 126.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-3
- Source: CSEL 44:9–10
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine relates how Pinianus offered to swear that he would reside at Hippo if not ordained against his will, and how the people demanded that any future ordination be at Hippo.

### Latin text

Inter hos aestus meos grauemque maerorem et nullius consilii respirationem ecce repente atque inopinate sanctus filius noster Pinianus mittit ad me seruum dei, qui mihi diceret eum se uelle populo iurare, quod, si esset ordinatus inuitus, ex Africa discederet omnino, credo, existimans eos, quando quidem peierare non posset, non iam ulterius infructuosa perseuerantia clamaturos ad expellendum hinc hominem, quem saltem deberemus habere uicinum. mihi autem quia uidebatur uehementiorem eorum dolorem post hanc iurationem fuisse metuendum, apud me tacitus habui et, quia simul petierat, ut ad eum uenirem, non distuli. cum mihi dixisset hoc ipsum, continuo et illud adiunxit eidem iurationi, quod mihi, dum ad eum pergo, per alium dei seruum mandauerat, de praesentia scilicet sua, si ei clericatus sarcinam nolenti nullus inponeret. hic ego in tantis angustiis quasi aura spirante recreatus nihil ei respondi, sed ad fratrem Alypium gradu concitatiore perrexi eique, quid dixerit, dixi. at ille, ut existimo, deuitans, ne quid se auctore fieret, unde uos putabat offendi: Hinc me inquit, nemo consulat. quo audito ad populum tumultuantem perrexi factoque silentio, quid promissum esset, cum promissione etiam iurationis aperui. illi uero, qui solum eius presbyterium cogitabant atque cupiebant, non ita, ut putabam, quod oblatum fuerat, acceperunt, sed inter se aliquantulum mussitantes petiuerunt, ut adderetur eidem promissioni atque iurationi, ut, si quando illi ad suscipiendum clericatum consentire placuisset, non nisi in ipsa Hipponiensi ecclesia consentiret. rettuli ad eum; sine dubitatione adnuit. renuntiaui illis; laetati sunt et mox iurationem pollicitam poposcerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Amid these anxieties of mine and my heavy grief, with no breathing space for any counsel, behold, suddenly and unexpectedly our holy son Pinianus sends a servant of God to tell me that he wished to swear to the people that, if he were ordained against his will, he would leave Africa altogether; thinking, I believe, that since he could not perjure himself, they would no longer shout with fruitless persistence and so drive away from here a man whom we ought at least to have as a neighbor. But since it seemed to me that their resentment was to be feared as more vehement after this oath, I kept it to myself in silence; and since he had at the same time asked me to come to him, I did not delay. When he had told me this very thing, he at once added to the same oath what he had sent me word of by another servant of God while I was on my way to him, namely, that he would reside here if no one laid the burden of clerical office on him against his will. At this, refreshed in such straits as by a breath of air, I answered him nothing, but went with quicker step to brother Alypius and told him what Pinianus had said. But he, avoiding, I think, that anything should be done on his authority by which he thought you would be offended, said: “Let no one consult me about this.” Having heard this, I went to the tumultuous people and, when silence had been obtained, disclosed what had been promised, together with the promise of an oath. But they, who thought of and desired only his presbyterate, did not receive what was offered as I had thought they would, but, muttering a little among themselves, asked that there be added to the same promise and oath that, if he should ever be pleased to consent to receive clerical office, he would consent only in the church of Hippo. I referred it to him; he agreed without hesitation. I announced it to them; they rejoiced and immediately demanded the promised oath.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.3 (CSEL 44:9–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-3).

## Letter 126.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-4
- Source: CSEL 44:10–11
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how a clause excusing Pinianus in case of necessity provoked the crowd and was withdrawn.

### Latin text

Reuerti ad filium nostrum eumque inueni fluctuantem, quibusnam uerbis comprehendi posset illa cum iuratione promissio propter necessitates inruentes, quae possent eum, ut abscederet, cogere. simul etiam, quid timeret, ostendit, ne quis inruisset hostilis incursus, qui esset discessione uitandus. uolebat addi sancta Melania et aeris morbidi causationem, sed illius responsione reprehensa est. ego autem dixi grauem ab illo et non contemnendam causam necessitatis ingestam, quae ciues etiam emigrare compelleret; sed si haec populo dicerentur, timendum esse, ne male nos ominari uideremur, si autem sub generali necessitatis nomine fieret excusatio, non nisi fraudulentam necessitatem putari. placuit tamen, ut de hac re populi animum experiremur, et nihil aliud quam id, quod putaueramus, inuenimus. nam cum eius uerba a diacono dicta recitarentur et omnia placuissent, ubi nomen interpositae necessitatis insonuit, continuo reclamatum est promissioque displicuit tumultu recrudescente et nihil aliud quam fraude secum agi populo existimante. quod cum sanctus filius noster uidisset iussit inde auferri nomen necessitatis rursumque ad laetitiam populus remeauit.

### English translation (Claude)

I returned to our son and found him wavering over the words in which that promise with the oath might be framed, because of emergencies that might arise and compel him to depart. At the same time he showed what he feared: that some hostile incursion might occur which would have to be escaped by departure. Holy Melania wanted the pretext of unhealthy air added too, but she was overruled by his reply. I said that he had raised a serious and not negligible cause of necessity, one that would compel even citizens to emigrate; but if this were said to the people, it was to be feared that we would seem to be making ill omens, while if the excuse were made under the general name of necessity, it would be thought nothing but a fraudulent necessity. It was decided, however, to test the people's mind on this, and we found nothing other than what we had expected. For when his words were read out by the deacon and everything had pleased them, as soon as the word “necessity,” which had been inserted, sounded, there was immediately a shout of protest and the promise displeased them, the tumult breaking out afresh and the people thinking that nothing but fraud was being practiced on them. When our holy son saw this, he ordered the word “necessity” to be removed, and the people returned to rejoicing.

### Translation notes

- Melania the Younger, Pinianus's wife.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.4 (CSEL 44:10–11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-4).

## Letter 126.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-5
- Source: CSEL 44:11
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that Pinianus swore and signed before the people, and that Augustine's own signature was left incomplete at Melania's objection.

### Latin text

Et ut lassitudinem recusarem, sine me ad plebem accedere noluit; simul accessimus. dixit ea, quae a diacono audita erant, se mandasse, se iurasse eaque se esse facturum continuoque omnia eo tenore, quo dictauerat, prosecutus est. responsum est: Deo gratias et petitum, ut totum scriptum subscriberetur. dimisimus catechumenos continuoque scriptum subscripsit. deinde peti coepimus nos episcopi non uocibus populi sed tamen a populo per honestos fideles, ut nos quoque subscriberemus. at ubi coepi subscribere, sancta Melania contradixit. miratus sum, quare tam sero, quasi promissionem illam et iurationem nos non subscribendo facere possemus infectam; sed tamen obtemperaui ac sic remansit mea non plena subscriptio nec ultra nobis quisquam, ut subscriberemus, putauit instandum.

### English translation (Claude)

And though I pleaded weariness, he would not go to the people without me; we went together. He said that he had sent the words they had heard from the deacon, that he had sworn them, and that he would carry them out; and at once he went through everything in the form in which he had dictated it. The answer was, “Thanks be to God,” and it was asked that the whole document be signed. We dismissed the catechumens, and at once he signed the document. Then we bishops began to be asked, not by the voices of the people, but still on the people's behalf through honorable members of the faithful, to sign it too. But when I began to sign, holy Melania objected. I wondered why she did so this late, as though we could make that promise and oath void by not signing; but I complied all the same, and so my signature remained incomplete, and no one thought we should be pressed further to sign.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.5 (CSEL 44:11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-5).

## Letter 126.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-6
- Source: CSEL 44:11–12
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine insists that Pinianus swore in his presence but not at his command, and that the people sought his ordination, not his oath, as God's work.

### Latin text

Qui autem alio die, posteaquam ipsum discessisse didicerunt, fuerint motus uel linguae hominum, quantum satis arbitratus sum, sanctitati uestrae per commonitorium intimare curaui. quisquis itaque uobis contraria his, quae narraui, forte narrauit, aut mentitur aut fallitur. quaedam enim, quae mihi ad curam non pertinere uisa sunt, praetermisisse me sentio, nulla tamen falsa dixisse. proinde sanctus filius noster Pinianus quod me praesente ac permittente iurauerit, uerum est; quod autem me praecipiente iurauerit, falsum est. scit ipse, sciunt serui dei, quos ad me misit, primo sanctus Barnabas, deinde Timasius, per quem etiam de promissione praesentiae suae mihi mandauit. ipse quoque populus ad presbyterium, non ad ius iurandum clamando cogebat; sed oblatum sibi non respuit ea spe, quo posset in eodem apud nos habitante uoluntas fieri, quo consentiret ad ordinationem, ne, sicut iurauerat, si inuitus ordinaretur, abscederet. ac per hoc et illi propter opus dei clamauerunt — neque enim sanctificatio presbyterii non est opus dei — et, quod postea de promissa praesentia gratulati non sunt, nisi adderetur, quod, si quando ad suscipiendum clericatum consentire uellet, non nisi in Hipponiensi ecclesia consentiret, satis in promptu est, quod etiam de ipsa eius apud se habitatione sperauerint, ideoque ab illo operis dei desiderio non recesserunt.

### English translation (Claude)

What stirrings there were, or what men said, on another day, after they learned that he had departed, I have taken care to inform Your Holiness by a memorandum, as far as I thought sufficient. Whoever, then, may perhaps have told you anything contrary to what I have narrated is either lying or mistaken. For I am aware that I have passed over some things which seemed to me not to concern the matter, but I have said nothing false. Accordingly, it is true that our holy son Pinianus swore in my presence and with my permission; but that he swore at my command is false. He himself knows it; the servants of God whom he sent to me know it, first holy Barnabas, then Timasius, through whom he also sent me word about the promise of his residence. The people too, by their shouting, were pressing for the presbyterate, not for an oath; but they did not reject the oath when it was offered to them, in the hope that, with him living among us, the will might arise in him to consent to ordination, so that he would not depart, as he had sworn to do if he were ordained against his will. And so they too shouted for the sake of God's work (for the consecration of a presbyter is certainly God's work); and since afterward they were not glad about the promised residence unless it were added that, if he ever wished to consent to receive clerical office, he would consent only in the church of Hippo, it is clear enough what they hoped for even from his living among them, and therefore they did not give up that desire for God's work.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.6 (CSEL 44:11–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-6).

## Letter 126.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-7
- Source: CSEL 44:12–13
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the people loved Pinianus's renunciation of wealth rather than coveting it, as they had loved his own renunciation of his small inheritance.

### Latin text

Quo modo ergo dicis hoc eos fecisse turpissimo appetitu pecuniae? primo quia ad plebem, quae clamabat, omnino non pertinet; sicut enim plebs Tagastensis de his, quae contulistis ecclesiae Tagastensi, non habet nisi gaudium boni operis uestri, sic et Hipponiensis et cuiuslibet alterius loci, ubi de mammona iniquitatis domini praecepta fecistis uel estis ubicumque facturi. non ergo populus, ut de tanto uiro ecclesiae consuleret suae, ardentissime flagitans suum pecuniarium commodum quaesiuit a uobis, sed uestrum pecuniae contemptum dilexit in uobis. nam si in me dilexerunt, quod audierant paucis agellulis paternis contemptis ad dei liberam seruitutem me fuisse conuersum, neque in hoc inuiderunt ecclesiae Tagastensi, quae carnalis patria mea est, sed, cum illa mihi clericatum non inposuisset, quando potuerunt, habendum inuaserunt, quanto flagrantius in nostro Piniano amare potuerunt tantam mundi istius cupiditatem, tantas opes, tantam spem tanta conuersione superatam atque calcatam! ego quippe secundum multorum sensum comparantium semet ipsos sibimet ipsis non diuitias dimisisse sed ad diuitias uideor uenisse. uix enim uigesima particula res mea paterna existimari potest in comparatione praediorum ecclesiae, quae nunc ut dominus existimor possidere. in qualibet autem maxime Africanarum ecclesiarum hic noster non dico presbyter sed episcopus sit, comparatus pristinis opibus suis, etiamsi animo dominantis egerit, pauperrimus erit. multo ergo liquidius et securius in hoc amatur Christiana paupertas, in quo nulla rerum ampliorum potest putari cupiditas. hoc accendit animos populi, hoc in illam uiolentiam perseuerantissimi clamoris erexit. non eos turpis cupiditatis insuper accusemus, sed magis bonum, quod ipsi non habent, saltem in aliis diligere sine crimine permittamus. nam etsi fuerunt illi multitudini permixti inopes uel mendici, qui simul clamabant et de uestra uenerabili redundantia indigentiae suae supplementum sperabant, nec ista, ut arbitror, cupiditas turpis est.

### English translation (Claude)

How then do you say that they did this out of a most shameful appetite for money? First, because it does not concern the common people who were shouting at all; for just as the people of Thagaste have nothing from what you gave to the church of Thagaste except joy in your good work, so too the people of Hippo, and of any other place where you have carried out, or wherever you will carry out, the Lord's precepts concerning the mammon of unrighteousness. It was not, then, their own financial advantage that the people sought from you when they demanded most ardently that their church be provided with so great a man; rather they loved in you your contempt of money. For if they loved in me what they had heard, that I had turned to the free service of God, despising a few little fields I had from my father, and in this they did not begrudge the church of Thagaste, which is my earthly homeland, but, since it had not imposed clerical office on me, seized me to have me when they could; how much more ardently could they love in our Pinianus so great a desire for this world, such great wealth, such great hope, overcome and trampled underfoot by so great a conversion! For in the view of many who compare themselves with themselves, I seem not to have given up riches but to have come into riches. For my father's property can scarcely be reckoned a twentieth part in comparison with the estates of the church, which I am now thought to possess as owner. But in whatever church this man of ours might be, especially among the African churches, not as presbyter, I say, but as bishop, compared with his former wealth he will be very poor, even if he acts with the mind of an owner. Much more clearly and securely, then, is Christian poverty loved in him, in whom no greed for greater possessions can be suspected. This is what kindled the minds of the people; this is what roused them to that violence of most persistent shouting. Let us not accuse them of shameful greed besides; let us rather allow them, without reproach, at least to love in others the good which they themselves do not have. For even if there were poor people or beggars mixed in that multitude, who shouted along with the rest and hoped for some relief of their need from your venerable abundance, not even this, I think, is shameful greed.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:9: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 10:12: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.7 (CSEL 44:12–13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-7).

## Letter 126.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-8
- Source: CSEL 44:13–14
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that the suspicion of greed can fall only on the clergy, and that Albina's suspicion compels him to call God to witness.

### Latin text

Restat ergo, ut iste pecuniae turpissimus appetitus ex obliquo in clericos et maxime in episcopum dirigatur. nos enim rebus ecclesiae dominari existimamur, nos opibus frui. postremo quicquid de istis nos accepimus, nos uel adhuc possidemus uel, ut placuit. erogauimus; nihil inde populo extra clericatum uel extra monasterium constituto nisi paucissimis indigentibus largiti sumus. non ergo dico, quia uel in nos maxime a uobis dici ista debuerunt, uerum tamen in nos solos credibiliter dici potuerunt. quid ergo faciemus? qua nos, si apud inimicos non possumus, saltem apud uos ratione purgamus? res haec animi est, intus est, procul ab oculis secreta mortalium deo tantum modo nota est. quid ergo restat nisi deum testari, cui nota est? cum ergo de nobis ista sentitis, non praecipitis, quod multo melius est et quod mihi in epistula tua tamquam culpabile obiciendum putasti, sed omnino cogitis, ut iuremus. non intentato metu mortis carnis nostrae, quod populus Hipponiensis fecisse putatus est, sed intentato metu mortis existimationis nostrae, quae propter infirmos, quibus nos praebere ad exemplum bonorum operum qualicumque conuersatione conamur, etiam uitae carnis huius utique praeponenda est.

### English translation (Claude)

It remains, then, that this most shameful appetite for money is directed obliquely at the clergy and especially at the bishop. For we are thought to be masters of the church's property; we are thought to enjoy its wealth. In short, whatever we have received of such gifts we either still possess or have distributed as we judged best; nothing of it have we given to the people outside the clergy or the monastery, except to a very few in need. I do not say, then, that these things ought to have been said by you especially against us, but that they could credibly be said only against us. What then shall we do? By what reasoning can we clear ourselves, if not before our enemies, at least before you? This matter is in the mind, it is within, hidden far from the eyes of mortals, known to God alone. What then remains but to call God to witness, to whom it is known? So when you think such things of us, you do not merely command us to swear (which would be much better, and which in your letter you thought should be held against me as blameworthy), but you altogether compel us to swear: not by threatening fear of death to our flesh, as the people of Hippo were thought to have done, but by threatening fear of death to our reputation, which, for the sake of the weak, to whom we try to offer ourselves as an example of good works by our way of life, such as it is, must certainly be preferred even to the life of this flesh.

### Scripture references

- Titus 2:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Albina had blamed Augustine for having Pinianus swear; Augustine replies that her suspicion compels him to take an oath himself (126.9).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.8 (CSEL 44:13–14; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-8).

## Letter 126.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-9
- Source: CSEL 44:14–15
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine calls God to witness that he bears the administration of church property out of duty, not love of it, and that Alypius is of the same mind.

### Latin text

Verum tamen uobis nos ita cogentibus, ut iuremus, non suscensemus, sicut uos Hipponiensibus suscensetis. creditis enim tamquam homines de hominibus etsi ea, quae in nobis non sunt, non tamen ea, quae in nobis esse non possunt. sananda ista in uobis, non accusanda sunt et nostra purganda uobis est fama, si est domino purgata conscientia. qui fortasse praestabit, sicut ante, quam accidisset ista temptatio, ego et frater meus Alypius conlocuti sumus, ut non solum uobis carissimis commembris nostris uerum etiam ipsis inimicis notissimum fiat nulla nos cupiditate pecuniae in rebus ecclesiasticis sordidari. quod donec fiat, si dominus donabit, ut fiat, ecce nunc interim, quod cogimur, facimus, ne uestri cordis medicinam in quantam libet moram temporis differamus. deus testis est istam omnem rerum ecclesiasticarum procurationem, quarum credimur amare dominatum, propter seruitutem, quam debeo caritati fratrum et timori dei, tolerare me, non amare, ita ut ea, si saluo officio possim, carere desiderem. nec aliud me de fratre meo Alypio sentire ipse deus testis est. tamen et de illo aliter sentiendo populus et, quod est grauius, Hipponiensis in tantas est illius praecipitatus iniurias et de nobis uos sancti dei et pleni uisceribus misericordiae talia credendo nomine eiusdem populi, qui ad causam huiusce modi cupiditatis omnino non pertinet, nos tangere atque admonere uoluistis utique ad nos corrigendos, neque enim odio, quod absit a uobis. unde non irasci sed gratias agere debeo, quod nec uerecundius nec liberius agere potuistis, ut episcopo non quasi conuiciose obiceretis, quod sentiebatis, sed ex obliquo intellegendum relinqueretis.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet we are not angry with you for compelling us to swear in this way, as you are angry with the people of Hippo. For you believe of us, as human beings of human beings, things which, though they are not in us, are yet not things that could not be in us. These things are to be healed in you, not accused, and our reputation must be cleared before you, if our conscience is clear before the Lord. He perhaps will grant, as my brother Alypius and I discussed before this temptation occurred, that it may become very well known not only to you, our dearest fellow members, but even to our enemies themselves, that we are not sullied by any greed for money in the affairs of the church. Until this happens (if the Lord grants that it happen), see, here and now we do what we are compelled to do, so as not to postpone for any length of time the healing of your heart. God is witness that all this management of the church's property, whose dominion we are believed to love, I bear because of the service I owe to the love of the brothers and to the fear of God, not that I love it, so that I would wish to be without it, if I could do so without failing in my duty. And God himself is witness that I think no differently of my brother Alypius. Yet the people, and, what is more serious, the people of Hippo, thinking otherwise of him, have been carried headlong into such insults against him; and you, holy ones of God and full of the bowels of mercy, believing such things of us, wished to touch and admonish us under the name of the same people, who have nothing at all to do with any cause for greed of this kind; surely in order to correct us, not out of hatred, which be far from you. Hence I ought not to be angry but to give thanks, that you could not act more modestly or more freely than by not throwing what you thought in a bishop's face as a reproach, but leaving it to be understood obliquely.

### Scripture references

- Col 3:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “God is witness” is the oath which Augustine says he is compelled to take.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.9 (CSEL 44:14–15; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-9).

## Letter 126.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-10
- Source: CSEL 44:15–16
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Paul's oath in 1 Thessalonians 2:5 as precedent for calling God to witness, and asks that the people not be accused of greed.

### Latin text

Nec molestum sit uobis, ut uos uelut grauatos arbitremini, quia iurandum putaui. neque enim grauabat apostolus aut eos parum diligebat, quibus dicebat: Non in sermone adulationis fuimus apud uos neque in occasione cupiditatis; deus testis est. rei quippe apertae ipsos testes adhibuit, rei autem occultae quem nisi deum? si ergo ille merito est ueritus, ne humana ignorantia de illo aliquid tale sentiret, cuius labor in promptu omnibus erat, quod nisi summa necessitate a populis, quibus Christi gratiam dispensabat, in usus suos aliquid non sumebat, cetera uero suo uictui necessaria suis manibus transigebat, quanto magis nobis laborandum est, ut credatur, qui et merito sanctitatis et uirtute animi longe inpares sumus nec aliquid ad sustentacula uitae huius operari nostris manibus possumus et, si possemus, tantis occupationibus, quas tunc illos non credo fuisse perpessos, nequaquam sineremur! non ergo ulterius in hac causa populo Christiano, quae ecclesia est dei, obiciatur pecuniae turpissimus appetitus. tolerabilius enim nobis obicitur, in quos huius mali quamuis falsa tamen uerisimilis suspicio cadere potuit, quam illis, quos ab hoc appetitu et a suspicione constat alienos.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should you be troubled, as though you thought yourselves blamed, because I thought I should swear. For the apostle was not blaming, nor loving too little, those to whom he said: “We were not among you with flattering speech, nor with a pretext for greed; God is witness.” For of the open matter he called them themselves as witnesses, but of the hidden matter whom but God? If, then, he rightly feared that human ignorance might think anything of the kind about him, whose labor was evident to all (for he took nothing for his own use from the peoples to whom he dispensed the grace of Christ except in the utmost necessity, but provided the other necessities of his living with his own hands), how much more must we labor to be believed, who are far unequal to him both in merit of holiness and in strength of mind, and cannot work at anything with our own hands for the support of this life, and, if we could, would by no means be allowed to by such great occupations, which I do not believe they endured then! Let not, then, a most shameful appetite for money be laid any further in this cause against the Christian people, which is the church of God. For it is more tolerably laid against us, on whom the suspicion of this evil, though false, could still plausibly fall, than against those who are evidently strangers both to this appetite and to the suspicion of it.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 20:34: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.10 (CSEL 44:15–16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-10).

## Letter 126.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-11
- Source: CSEL 44:16–17
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Albina that an oath must be kept even when given under fear, as even soldiers keep oaths sworn to enemies.

### Latin text

Denegare autem iurationem qualibet fide praeditas mentes, quanto magis fide Christiana, non dico aliquid contrarium confirmare, sed omnino dubitare fas non est. de qua re quid sentiam, satis, ut arbitror, in epistula, quam ad fratrem meum scripsi, planissime aperui. scripsit mihi sanctitas tua: Si aut ego aut Hipponienses hoc censent, ut iuri iurando uiolenter extorto satis fiat>. tu enim ipsa quid censes? placetne tibi, ut etiam certa morte imminente, quod tunc inaniter metuebatur, nomen domini dei sui in fallaciam Christianus adsumat, deum suum testem falsitati Christianus adhibeat? qui profecto si praeter iurationem ad falsum testimonium morte imminente cogeretur, maculare uitam suam magis timere debuit quam finire. hostiles inter se acies et armatae certe apertissima mortis intentione confligunt et tamen, cum inuicem iurant, laudamus fidem seruantes, fallentes autem merito detestamur. ut autem iurarent, quid utraeque ab alterutris nisi occidi uel capi timuerunt? ac per hoc uel mortis uel captiuitatis metu extortae iurationi nisi parcatur, nisi fides, quae ibi data est, custodiatur, sacrilegii, periurii crimine detinentur etiam tales homines, qui magis metuunt peierare quam hominem occidere, et nos, utrum implenda sit extorta iuratio seruorum dei munere sanctitatis praeminentium, monachorum ad perfectionem mandatorum Christi rerum etiam suarum distributione currentium quasi disceptaturi ponimus quaestionem?

### English translation (Claude)

For minds endowed with any faith whatever, how much more with Christian faith, it is not right to deny an oath its due; I do not say by affirming something contrary to it, but even by doubting it at all. What I think on this matter I have, I believe, set out sufficiently and very plainly in the letter I wrote to my brother. Your Holiness wrote to me: “Whether either I or the people of Hippo hold that an oath extorted by violence should be fulfilled.” But what do you yourself hold? Does it please you that, even with certain death threatening (which was then feared in vain), a Christian should take the name of the Lord his God in deceit, a Christian should call his God as witness to a falsehood? Surely, if apart from an oath he were compelled under threat of death to give false testimony, he ought to have feared staining his life more than ending it. Hostile armies clash with one another, armed and certainly with the most open threat of death; and yet, when they swear to each other, we praise those who keep faith and rightly detest those who deceive. And in order that they should swear, what did each side fear from the other but to be killed or captured? And therefore, unless an oath extorted by fear of death or captivity is respected, unless the faith given there is kept, even such men, who fear perjury more than killing a man, are held guilty of the crime of sacrilege and perjury; and do we propose for debate, as it were, the question whether an extorted oath must be fulfilled by servants of God who are eminent in the gift of holiness, monks running toward the perfection of Christ's commandments even by distributing their own property?

### Scripture references

- Exod 20:7: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 19:21: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.11 (CSEL 44:16–17; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-11).

## Letter 126.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-12
- Source: CSEL 44:17
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine denies that residence at Hippo is a form of exile and insists that the oath was offered, not extorted.

### Latin text

Nam quid exilii uel deportationis aut relegationis nomine promissa illa praesentia praegrauatur? obsecro te. puto, quod presbyterium non est exilium. hoc ergo noster eligeret quam illud exilium? absit a nobis, ut sic sanctus dei et nobis carissimus defendatur, absit, inquam, ut dicatur maluisse exilium quam presbyterium aut maluisse periurium quam exilium. haec dicerem, si uere a nobis aut a populo iuratio ei fuisset extorta promittendae praesentiae; nunc uero non extorta est, dum negaretur, sed, dum offerretur, accepta et hoc ea spe, sicut supra diximus, quia per illam praesentiam creditum est eum etiam ad clericatum suscipiendum posse desiderantibus consentire. postremo, quodlibet de nobis uel de Hipponiensibus sentiatur, longe alia est eorum causa, qui coegerint iurare, quam eorum, qui non dicam coegerint, sed suaserint peierare. ipse etiam, de quo agitur, considerare non renuat, utrum sit peius sub quolibet timore ius iurandum an remoto timore ipso periurium.

### English translation (Claude)

For why is that promised residence weighed down with the name of exile, or deportation, or banishment? I beg you to tell me. I think the presbyterate is not exile. Would our friend, then, have chosen that exile rather than this? Far be it from us that the holy one of God, so dear to us, be defended in this way; far be it, I say, that it be said that he preferred exile to the presbyterate, or perjury to exile. I would say these things if the oath promising residence had really been extorted from him by us or by the people; but in fact it was not extorted from him while he refused, but accepted when he offered it, and that in the hope, as we said above, that through that residence he might, it was believed, also consent to receive clerical office for those who desired it. Finally, whatever is thought of us or of the people of Hippo, the case of those who compelled someone to swear is far different from that of those who, I will not say compelled, but persuaded someone to perjure himself. Let the man himself who is concerned not refuse to consider whether it is worse to take an oath under any fear whatever, or to commit perjury when that fear is removed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.12 (CSEL 44:17; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-12).

## Letter 126.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-13
- Source: CSEL 44:17–18
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the people expect only that Pinianus reside at Hippo with the intention of returning from any journey, and that the necessity clause was withdrawn by Pinianus himself.

### Latin text

Deo gratias, quia non aliter Hipponienses promissum circa se impleri sentiunt, quam ut adsit uoluntate habitandi et eat, quo necesse fuerit, cum dispositione redeundi. nam si uerba iurationis adtenderent et exigerent, nullo modo seruus dei recedere quam ullo modo debuit peierare. sed quia crimen eorum esset non dico talem uirum sed quemlibet hominem sic tenere, nec ipsi aliam expectationem se habuisse probauerunt, qui audientes, quod rediturus abscesserit, gratulati sunt, nec aliud illis uerax iuratio debet quam id, quod ab illa expectauerunt. quid est autem, quod dicitur eum iuratione ore suo expressa exceptionem fecisse necessitatis? quasi non ore suo rursus hoc iussit auferri. certe ad populum quando ipse locutus est. tunc etiam interponeret. quod si fecisset, non utique responderetur: Deo gratias>, sed ad illam rediretur reclamationem. quae facta fuerat, quando sic a diacono recitatum est. et numquid ad rem pertinet, siue interposita sit ad recedendum necessitatis excusatio siue non sit? nihil ab illo aliud expectatum est quam id, quod supra diximus. expectationem autem eorum, quibus iuratur, quisquis deceperit, non potest esse non periurus.

### English translation (Claude)

Thanks be to God that the people of Hippo consider the promise concerning him to be fulfilled in no other way than that he be present with the will to reside, and go wherever it may be necessary with the intention of returning. For if they attended to the words of the oath and exacted them, the servant of God ought in no way to depart rather than in any way perjure himself. But since it would be a crime on their part to hold, I do not say such a man, but any man in that way, they themselves have shown that they had no other expectation, since they rejoiced on hearing that he had departed intending to return; and a truthful oath owes them nothing other than what they expected of it. And what is this that is said, that in the oath uttered by his own mouth he made an exception for necessity? As if he had not by his own mouth ordered this to be removed again. Certainly, when he himself spoke to the people, he would have inserted it then too. If he had done so, the answer would certainly not have been “Thanks be to God,” but there would have been a return to the outcry that had arisen when it was read out in that form by the deacon. And does it make any difference whether an excuse of necessity for departing was inserted or not? Nothing else was expected of him than what we said above. And whoever deceives the expectation of those to whom he swears cannot but be a perjurer.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.13 (CSEL 44:17–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-13).

## Letter 126.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-14
- Source: CSEL 44:18–19
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges that Pinianus keep his promise for the sake of the weak, and defends his own acceptance of the oath.

### Latin text

Fiat ergo, quod promissum est, et infirmorum corda sanentur, ne tanto exemplo. quibus hoc placuerit, ad imitandum periurium aedificentur. quibus autem displicet, iustissime dicant nulli nostrum credendum esse non solum promittenti aliquid sed etiam iuranti. hinc enim potius cauendae sunt linguae inimicorum, de quibus tamquam iaculis ad interficiendos infirmos maior ille utitur inimicus. sed absit, ut de tali anima speremus aliud, quam quod dei timor inspirat et tanta, quae in illa est, excellentia sanctitatis hortatur. ego autem, quem dicis etiam prohibere debuisse, fateor, non potui sic sapere, ut tanto uel tumultu uel offensione magis euerti uellem ecclesiam, cui seruio, quam id, quod a tali uiro nobis offerebatur, accipere.

### English translation (Claude)

Let what was promised be done, then, and let the hearts of the weak be healed; lest by so great an example those whom this pleases be built up to imitate perjury, and those whom it displeases say most justly that none of us is to be believed, not only when promising something but even when swearing. For it is from this quarter rather that we must guard against the tongues of enemies, which that greater enemy uses like darts to kill the weak. But far be it from us to hope anything else of such a soul than what the fear of God inspires and the so great excellence of holiness that is in it encourages. As for me, who you say ought even to have forbidden it, I confess I could not be so wise as to prefer that the church I serve be overthrown by so great a tumult or offense rather than accept what was offered to us by such a man.

### Scripture references

- Eph 6:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 126.14 (CSEL 44:18–19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-126-14).

## Letter 127.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-1
- Source: CSEL 44:19–20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Armentarius, who with his wife has vowed continence, to fulfill his vow without delay.

### Latin text

Vir egregius, filius meus Ruferius, adfinis uester, rettulit mihi, quid domino uoueritis. qua eius narratione hilaratus et ibidem metuens, ne aliud suadeat ille temptator, qui bonis talibus antiquitus inuidet, exhortandam paucis credidi caritatem tuam, domine eximie meritoque honorabilis et desiderabilis fili, ut cogites, quod in diuinis eloquiis legitur: Ne tardes conuerti ad dominum neque differas de die in diem atque arripias curesque reddendum, quod ei te uouisse nosti, qui et debita exigit et promissa persoluit. nam et hoc scriptum est: Vouete et reddite domino deo nostro. quamquam etsi non uouisses, quid aliud tibi suadendum fuit aut quid melius ab homine fieri potest, quam ut ei se restituat, a quo institutus est, praesertim quia caritatis erga nos dei tantum apparuit atque inluxit indicium, ut filium suum unigenitum mitteret, qui pro nobis moreretur? restat ergo, ut fiat, quod apostolus ait, propterea mortuum esse Christum, ut, qui uiuunt, iam non sibi uiuant sed ei, qui pro ipsis mortuus est et resurrexit, nisi forte adhuc mundus amandus est tanta rerum labe contritus, ut etiam speciem seductionis amiserit. nam quantum illi laudandi atque praedicandi, qui dignati non sunt cum mundo etiam florente florere, tantum increpandi et accusandi sunt, quos perire cum pereunte delectat.

### English translation (Claude)

That excellent man, my son Ruferius, your kinsman, has told me what you have vowed to the Lord. Gladdened by his account, and at the same time fearing that the tempter, who from of old envies such goods, may persuade you otherwise, I thought I should exhort Your Charity in a few words, excellent lord and deservedly honorable and longed-for son, to consider what is read in the divine oracles: “Do not delay to turn to the Lord, nor put it off from day to day”; and to take up and see to the payment of what you know you have vowed to him who both exacts debts and pays what he promises. For this too is written: “Vow and pay to the Lord our God.” And yet, even if you had not vowed, what else should you have been urged to, or what better can a man do than restore himself to him by whom he was made, especially since so great a sign of God's love toward us has appeared and shone forth, that he sent his only-begotten Son to die for us? It remains, then, that what the apostle says be done, that Christ died for this, that those who live may live no longer for themselves but for him who died for them and rose again; unless perhaps the world is still to be loved, worn down by such a collapse of things that it has lost even the appearance of allurement. For as much as those are to be praised and proclaimed who did not deign to flourish with the world even when it was flourishing, so much are those to be rebuked and accused who delight to perish with it as it perishes.

### Scripture references

- Ps 76:11 (75:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:9: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:16: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 5:15: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 5:7 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Armentarius and his wife Paulina (named in the manuscripts' heading). Sir 5:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.1 (CSEL 44:19–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-1).

## Letter 127.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-2
- Source: CSEL 44:20–22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts the great efforts made to prolong this brief and uncertain life with the far greater reason to strive for eternal life.

### Latin text

Labores et pericula et exitia huius transitoriae uitae si pro eadem uita quandoque finienda subeuntur, ut mors eius non omnino auferatur, sed paululum differatur, quanto magis pro aeterna subeunda sunt, ubi mortem nec natura sollicite cauet nec ignauia turpiter timet nec sapientia fortiter sustinet! nulli quippe erit, quae non erit. habeat igitur te uita aeterna in dilectoribus suis. nonne cernis, haec uita miserabilis et egena quam uehementes habeat quantumque sibi obliget amatores suos? qui tamen periculo eius saepe turbati citius eam finiunt eo ipso, quo finire formidant, et mortem dum declinant, accelerant, ueluti si quisquam fluuio rapiendus inruat latronem bestiamue fugiendo. iactant in mare tempestate saeuiente aliquando et alimenta et, ut uiuant, proiciunt, unde uiuunt, ne cito finiatur, quod uel in labore uiuitur. quantis laboribus agitur, ut longiore tempore laboretur! et mors cum inpendere coeperit, ideo cauetur, ut diutius timeatur. nam inter tot casus fragilitatis humanae quam multae mortes timentur, quarum certe una cum uenerit, restat ceteras non timeri! et tamen fugitur una, ut omnes timeantur. quibus excruciantur doloribus, qui curantur a medicis et secantur! numquid ut non moriantur? sed ut aliquanto serius moriantur. multi cruciatus suscipiuntur certi, ut pauci dies adiciantur incerti, et nonnumquam ipsis doloribus uicti continuo moriuntur, quos mortis timore suscipiunt, et cum omnino non eligant uitam finire, ne doleant, sed dolere, ne finiant, accidit eis, ut et doleant et finiant, non solum quia et sanati uitam utique finiunt post dolores, quae tantis poenis comparata nec sempiterna esse potest, quia mortalis est, nec diuturna, quia tota breuis est, nec de ipso breui spatio sui secura, quia semper incerta est, uerum etiam quod aliquando eam dolore finierunt, quam ne finirent, dolere uoluerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

If the labors and dangers and ruins of this transitory life are undergone for the sake of that same life, which must end some day, so that its death is not taken away altogether but only put off a little, how much more are they to be undergone for eternal life, where death is neither anxiously avoided by nature, nor shamefully feared by cowardice, nor bravely endured by wisdom! For it will be no one's, since it will not exist. Let eternal life, then, have you among its lovers. Do you not see how vehement are the lovers of this miserable and needy life, and how much it binds them to itself? Yet they, often thrown into confusion by its danger, end it the sooner by the very means by which they fear to end it, and while they shun death they hasten it, as if someone fleeing a robber or a wild beast should rush into a river and be swept away. In a raging storm they sometimes throw even their food into the sea, and to live they cast away that by which they live, lest there be a speedy end of a life that is lived even in toil. With what great labors men act so as to labor for a longer time! And when death begins to threaten, it is avoided so that it may be feared longer. For amid so many accidents of human frailty, how many deaths are feared, of which, when one has come, the rest are certainly no longer to be feared! And yet one is fled so that all may be feared. With what pains are those tortured who are treated and cut by doctors! Is it so that they may not die? No, but that they may die somewhat later. Many certain tortures are undergone so that a few uncertain days may be added; and sometimes, overcome by the very pains they undergo for fear of death, they die at once. And though they by no means choose to end life so as not to suffer, but rather to suffer so as not to end it, it befalls them both to suffer and to end it: not only because even when healed they certainly end, after their pains, a life bought with such punishments, which can be neither everlasting, since it is mortal, nor long-lasting, since it is wholly brief, nor secure even of its brief span, since it is always uncertain; but also because sometimes they have ended by pain the very life which they were willing to suffer pain so as not to end.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.2 (CSEL 44:20–22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-2).

## Letter 127.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-3
- Source: CSEL 44:22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that excessive love of this life leads many to offend God and lose eternal life.

### Latin text

Habet etiam hoc magnum malum ac uehementer execrandum et horrendum nimius amor uitae istius, quod multi, dum uolunt paulo diutius uiuere, grauiter offendunt deum, apud quem est fons uitae, atque ita, dum ab eis frustra, qui necessario futurus est uitae finis, metuitur, illinc prohibentur, ubi sine fine uiuitur. huc accedit, quia uita misera, etiam si posset esse perpetua, nullo modo beatae uitae etiam breuissimae comparanda est. et tamen isti amando miserrimam atque breuissimam perdunt beatissimam ac sempiternam, cum in hac ipsa, quam male diligunt, hoc uelint, quod in altera perdunt, quia utique in ista nec miseriam diligunt, nam beati esse uolunt, nec breuitatem, nam eam finire nolunt; tantum quia uita est, sic amatur, ut saepe propter eam licet miseram et breuem beata et sempiterna amittatur.

### English translation (Claude)

This too is a great evil in the excessive love of this life, and one vehemently to be cursed and dreaded: that many, while they want to live a little longer, gravely offend God, with whom is the fountain of life; and so, while they fear in vain the end of life which must necessarily come, they are shut out from the place where one lives without end. Add to this that a miserable life, even if it could be perpetual, is in no way to be compared with a happy life even of the shortest. And yet these people, by loving a most miserable and most brief life, lose a most happy and everlasting one, while in this very life which they wrongly love they want what they lose in the other; for certainly in this life they love neither misery, since they want to be happy, nor brevity, since they do not want it to end. Only because it is life is it so loved that often, for its sake, miserable and brief as it is, the happy and everlasting life is lost.

### Scripture references

- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.3 (CSEL 44:22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-3).

## Letter 127.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-4
- Source: CSEL 44:22–23
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine points to those who gave up all their wealth to save their lives in the sack of Rome as a lesson in how eternal life should be loved.

### Latin text

His consideratis quid magnum uita aeterna iubeat amatoribus suis, cum se iubet sic amari, quem ad modum haec amatur a suis? an uero dignum est uel ferendum, cum contemnuntur omnia, quae amantur in mundo, ut uita post paululum finienda saltem ipsum paululum teneatur in mundo, et non contemnitur mundus, ut obtineatur uita, quae sine fine apud illum est, per quem factus est mundus? modo cum ipsa Roma, domicilium clarissimi imperii, barbarico uastaretur incursu, quam multi uitae huius temporalis amatores, ut eam uel infeliciter producendam nudamque redimerent, dederunt omnia, quae illi non solum oblectandae et ornandae uerum etiam sustentandae tuendaeque seruabant! solent certe amatores illis, quas amant, ut eas habeant, multa conferre; isti amatam suam non haberent, nisi amando inopem reddidissent, nec ei multa conferrent, sed cuncta potius auferrent, ne sibi eam hostis auferret. nec eorum reprehendo consilium; quis enim nesciat perituram fuisse ipsam, si non ea perissent, quae recondita fuerant propter ipsam? quamuis et quidam perdiderint prius illa mox ipsam, quidam uero licet parati cuncta perdere propter ipsam prius perdiderint ipsam. sed hinc admonendi sumus, quales aeternae uitae dilectores esse debeamus, ut propter eam contemnamus cuncta superflua, cum pro hac transitoria uita contempta sint, quae illi fuerant necessaria.

### English translation (Claude)

These things considered, what great thing does eternal life command of its lovers, when it commands that it be loved as this life is loved by its own? Or is it fitting or tolerable that all things loved in the world are despised so that a life which is soon to end may be kept in the world at least for that short while, and yet the world is not despised so that a life may be obtained which is without end with him through whom the world was made? Lately, when Rome itself, the home of the most glorious empire, was laid waste by barbarian invasion, how many lovers of this temporal life gave everything they kept, not only for its delight and adornment but even for its support and protection, to buy it back, even if it was to be prolonged unhappily and stripped bare! Lovers are certainly accustomed to bestow many gifts on those they love, in order to have them; these men would not have had their beloved unless by loving her they had made her poor, nor did they bestow many things on her but rather took everything away, lest the enemy take her from them. Nor do I blame their plan; for who does not know that she would have perished had not those things perished which had been stored up for her sake? Although some lost those things first and soon her too, while others, though ready to lose everything for her sake, lost her first. But from this we should be admonished what kind of lovers of eternal life we ought to be, so that for its sake we despise everything superfluous, since for this transitory life even the things necessary to it were despised.

### Scripture references

- John 1:10: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The sack of Rome by Alaric's Goths in 410.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.4 (CSEL 44:22–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-4).

## Letter 127.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-5
- Source: CSEL 44:23–25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges that this life be made the servant of eternal life by taking Christ's easy yoke, under which a good will finds rest.

### Latin text

Neque enim amatam nostram sicut illi suam, ut teneamus, expoliamus, sed illi aeternae adipiscendae istam temporalem uelut famulam expeditiorem seruire facimus, si eam nec ornamentorum uanorum uinculis alligemus nec curarum noxiarum sarcinis oneremus audiamusque dominum, qui nobis illam uitam summo ardore desiderandam fidelissime pollicetur, uelut in totius mundi contione clamantem: Venite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quoniam mitis sum et humilis corde, et inuenietis requiem animabus uestris; iugum enim meum lene est et onus meum leue est. haec disciplina piae humilitatis uentosam et turbidam cupiditatem auidam rerum extra nostram potestatem constitutarum pellit ex animo et quodam modo expirat. ibi enim labor, ubi multa quaeruntur et diliguntur, quibus adipiscendis atque retinendis uoluntas non satis est, quia consequentem non habet facultatem. iusta uero uita, cum uolumus, adest, quia eam ipsam plene uelle iustitia est nec plus aliquid perficienda iustitia quam perfectam uoluntatem requirit. uide, si labor est, ubi uelle satis est. unde diuinitus dictum est: Pax in terra hominibus bonae uoluntatis. ubi pax, ibi requies; ubi requies, ibi finis appetendi et nulla causa laborandi. sed haec uoluntas ut plena sit, oportet ut sana sit; erit autem sana, si medicum non refugiat, cuius solius gratia sanari potest a morbo desideriorum noxiorum. ipse est ergo medicus, qui clamat: Venite ad me omnes, qui laboratis, iugum suum lene et onus leue dicens, quia diffusa per spiritum sanctum caritate in cordibus nostris profecto amabitur, quod iubebitur, et non erit asperum nec onerosum, si sub hoc uno iugo quanto minus tumida tanto magis libera ceruice seruiatur. et haec est una sarcina, qua eius baiulus non premitur, sed leuatur. diuitiae si diliguntur, ibi seruentur, ubi perire non possunt; honor si diligitur, illic habeatur, ubi nemo indignus honoratur; salus si diligitur, ibi adipiscenda desideretur, ubi adeptae nihil timetur; uita si diligitur, ibi adquiratur, ubi nulla morte finitur.

### English translation (Claude)

For we do not strip our beloved, as they did theirs, in order to keep her; rather we make this temporal life serve as a less encumbered handmaid for gaining the eternal one, if we neither bind it with the chains of vain ornaments nor burden it with the loads of harmful cares, and if we listen to the Lord, who most faithfully promises us that life, to be desired with the highest ardor, crying out as it were in the assembly of the whole world: “Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls; for my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” This discipline of pious humility drives out of the mind, and in a way breathes out, the windy and turbulent desire that is greedy for things placed outside our power. For there is labor where many things are sought and loved for whose obtaining and keeping the will is not enough, because it does not have the ability to follow through. But the just life is present when we will it, because to will it fully is itself justice, and justice requires nothing more for its accomplishment than a perfect will. See whether there is labor where to will is enough. Hence it was divinely said: “Peace on earth to men of good will.” Where there is peace, there is rest; where there is rest, there is the end of desiring and no cause for laboring. But for this will to be full it must be healthy; and it will be healthy if it does not flee the physician by whose grace alone it can be healed of the disease of harmful desires. He, then, is the physician who cries, “Come to me, all you who labor,” calling his yoke easy and his burden light; because, when love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, what is commanded will surely be loved, and it will not be harsh or burdensome if one serves under this one yoke with a neck the more free the less it is swollen with pride. And this is the one load by which its bearer is not weighed down but lifted up. If riches are loved, let them be kept where they cannot perish; if honor is loved, let it be had where no one unworthy is honored; if health is loved, let it be sought where, once obtained, nothing is feared; if life is loved, let it be acquired where it is ended by no death.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:30: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:20: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.5 (CSEL 44:23–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-5).

## Letter 127.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-6
- Source: CSEL 44:25–26
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that in fulfilling a vow one pays oneself to God, whose image man bears as the coin bore Caesar's.

### Latin text

Reddite igitur, quod uouistis, quia uos ipsi estis et ei uos redditis, a quo estis; reddite, obsecro. neque enim, quod redditis, reddendo minuetur, sed potius seruabitur et augebitur; benignus enim exactor est, non egenus, et qui non crescat ex redditis, sed in se crescere faciat redditores. huic ergo quod non redditur, perditur, quod autem redditur, reddenti additur, immo uero in eo, cui redditur, reddens ipse seruatur. id ipsum quippe erit redditum et redditor, quia id ipsum erat debitum et debitor. deo namque se ipsum homo debet eique reddendus est, ut beatus sit. a quo accepit, ut sit. hoc significat, quod in euangelio dominus ait: Reddite Caesari, quae caesaris sunt, et deo, quae dei sunt. hoc enim dixit, cum sibi demonstrato nummo et quaesito, cuius haberet imaginem, responsum esset: Caesaris, ut hinc intellegerent, quod deus exigeret ab homine imaginem suam in homine ipso, sicut suam Caesar exigebat in nummo. quanto magis ergo reddenda est, cum promittitur, cui etiam non promissa debetur!

### English translation (Claude)

Pay, then, what you have vowed, because you yourselves are what you pay, and you pay yourselves to him from whom you have your being; pay, I beg you. For what you pay will not be diminished by paying, but rather kept and increased; for he is a kind creditor, not a needy one, one who does not grow from what is paid but makes those who pay grow in himself. To him, then, what is not paid is lost, while what is paid is added to the one who pays; or rather, the payer himself is kept safe in him to whom he pays. For the same thing will be both the payment and the payer, because the same thing was both the debt and the debtor. For man owes himself to God, and must be paid back to him from whom he received his existence, in order to be happy. This is what the Lord means in the gospel: “Render to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.” For he said this when a coin had been shown to him and he had asked whose image it bore, and the answer was “Caesar's”; so that they might understand from this that God demands from man his own image in man himself, as Caesar demanded his in the coin. How much more, then, must it be paid when it has been promised, since it is owed to him even when not promised!

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:20: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:27: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.6 (CSEL 44:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-6).

## Letter 127.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-7
- Source: CSEL 44:26–27
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes Christians who love the world from those who despise it, citing the parable of the houses built on rock and on sand.

### Latin text

Quapropter, carissime, possem quidem pro mea quantulacumque facultatula sancti propositi, quod deo uouisse uos comperi, uberius laudare fructum ac demonstrare, quid distet inter Christianos dilectores mundi huius et contemptores, quamuis fideles utrique dicantur, eodem utrique lauacro sacri fontis abluti sint, eisdem inbuti consecratique mysteriis, utrique eiusdem euangelii non auditores tantum uerum etiam praedicatores nec utrique tamen regni dei lucisque participes et uitae aeternae, quae sola est beata, coheredes. dominus enim Iesus non ab eis, qui non audiunt, sed eos inter se auditores uerborum suorum latissimo limite, non tenui distinctione discreuit: Qui audit, inquit, uerba mea haec et facit ea, similabo eum uiro prudenti, qui aedificauit domum suam super petram: descendit pluuia, uenerunt flumina, flauerunt uenti et impegerunt in domum illam et non cecidit; fundata enim erat super petram. qui autem audit uerba mea haec et non facit ea, similabo eum uiro stulto, qui aedificauit domum suam super harenam: descendit pluuia, uenerunt flumina, flauerunt uenti et impegerunt in domum illam et cecidit et facta est ruina eius magna. audire ergo uerba illa aedificare est; in hoc utrique pares sunt, in faciendo autem et non faciendo, quod audiunt, tantum dispares, quantum aedificium petrae soliditate fundatum dispar est ei, quod sine ullo fundamento facili harenae mobilitate subuertitur. nec ideo, quisquis omnino non audit, tutius sibi aliquid comparat; nihil enim aedificans sine ullo tecto multo facilius obruendus, rapiendus et dispergendus imbribus, fluuiis uentisque donatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Wherefore, dearest friend, I could indeed, according to my small little ability, praise more fully the fruit of the holy resolution which I have learned that you have vowed to God, and show the difference between Christians who love this world and those who despise it. Both are called faithful, both have been washed in the same bath of the sacred font, imbued and consecrated with the same mysteries, both are not only hearers but also preachers of the same gospel, and yet they are not both partakers of the kingdom of God and of light, and co-heirs of eternal life, which alone is happy. For the Lord Jesus distinguished, not those who do not hear his words from those who do, but the hearers of his words among themselves, by a very wide boundary and no slight distinction: “He who hears these words of mine and does them,” he says, “I will liken to a wise man who built his house upon the rock: the rain came down, the rivers came, the winds blew and beat upon that house, and it did not fall; for it was founded on the rock. But he who hears these words of mine and does not do them, I will liken to a foolish man who built his house upon the sand: the rain came down, the rivers came, the winds blew and beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was its ruin.” To hear those words, then, is to build; in this both are equal; but in doing or not doing what they hear they are as unequal as a building founded on the solidity of rock is unequal to one which, having no foundation, is overturned by the easy shifting of sand. Nor does one who does not hear at all procure anything safer for himself; for he builds nothing and has no roof, and so is given over much more easily to be overwhelmed, carried off, and scattered by rains, rivers, and winds.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:24: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:25: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:27: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.7 (CSEL 44:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-7).

## Letter 127.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-8
- Source: CSEL 44:27–28
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Armentarius that, having vowed continence, he is now bound to it, and that breaking the vow would make him worse than if he had never made it.

### Latin text

Possem etiam pro modulo meo eosdem ipsos pertinentes ad dexteram regnumque caelorum in suis gradibus meritisque distinguere atque ostendere, quo differat uita coniugalis filios procreantium patrum matrumque familias uerum tamen religiosorum ac piorum ab ea uita, quam uos deo uouistis, si nunc ad eam uouendam exhortandus esses; sed quia iam uouisti, iam te obstrinxisti, aliud tibi facere non licet. priusquam esses uoti reus, liberum fuit, quo esses inferior, quamuis non sit gratulanda libertas, qua fit, ut non debeatur, quod cum lucro redditur. nunc uero, quia tenetur apud deum sponsio tua, non te ad magnam iustitiam inuito, sed a magna iniquitate deterreo. non enim talis eris, si non feceris, quod uouisti, qualis mansisses, si nihil tale uouisses. minor enim tunc esses, non peior; modo autem tanto — quod absit — miserior, si fidem deo fregeris, quanto beatior, si persolueris. nec ideo te uouisse paeniteat, immo gaude iam tibi non licere, quod cum tuo detrimento licuisset. adgredere itaque intrepidus et dicta imple factis; ipse adiuuabit, qui uota tua expetit. felix est necessitas, quae in meliora compellit.

### English translation (Claude)

I could also, according to my small measure, distinguish those very people who belong to the right hand and the kingdom of heaven according to their grades and merits, and show how the married life of fathers and mothers of families who beget children, though they are religious and pious, differs from the life which you have vowed to God, if you now needed to be exhorted to vow it; but since you have already vowed it and already bound yourself, you may not do otherwise. Before you were bound by the vow, you were free to be lower, although that freedom is not to be congratulated by which something that is repaid with profit is not owed. But now, since your pledge is held before God, I am not inviting you to great righteousness but deterring you from great iniquity. For if you do not do what you have vowed, you will not be such as you would have remained if you had vowed nothing of the kind. For then you would be lesser, not worse; but now, may it not be so, you would be as much more wretched, if you broke faith with God, as you will be happier if you fulfill it. Nor should you regret having vowed; rather rejoice that it is no longer permitted to you which would have been permitted only to your loss. Go forward, then, without fear, and fulfill your words with deeds; he himself who seeks your vows will help you. Happy is the necessity that compels us to better things.

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:33: allusion, medium confidence
- Eccl 5:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.8 (CSEL 44:27–28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-8).

## Letter 127.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-9
- Source: CSEL 44:28–30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that a vow of continence in marriage requires the consent of both spouses, and since Paulina consents, urges Armentarius to keep it with her.

### Latin text

Una sola esse causa posset, qua te id, quod uouisti, non solum non hortaremur, uerum etiam prohiberemus implere, si forte tua coniux hoc tecum suscipere animi seu carnis infirmitate recusaret. nam et uouenda talia non sunt a coniugatis nisi ex consensu et uoluntate communi et, si praepropere factum fuerit, magis est corrigenda temeritas quam persoluenda promissio. neque enim deus exigit, si quis ex alieno aliquid uouerit, sed potius usurpare uetat alienum. diuina quippe de hac re per apostolum est prolata sententia: Uxor non habet potestatem corporis sui sed uir; similiter et uir non habet potestatem sui corporis sed mulier. sexum nomine corporis nuncupauit. sed cum illam tam paratam esse audiam deo dicare continentiam, ut eo solo impediatur, si tibi debitum reddere coniugali iure compellitur, ambo deo reddite, quod ambo uouistis, ut illi persoluatur, quod ab alterutro non exigitis. si continentia uirtus est, sicuti est, cur ad eam sit promptior sexus infirmior, cum uirtus a uiro potius cognominata uideatur, sicut similitudo uocabuli resonat? noli ergo uir abhorrere a uirtute, quam mulier est parata suscipere. sit uester consensus oblatio ad supernum altare creatoris et uicta concupiscentia tanto fortius quanto sanctius uinculum caritatis. gaudeamus de uobis in abundanti gratia Christi, domini eximii meritoque honorabiles et desiderabiles filii.

### English translation (Claude)

There could be one single reason for which we would not only not exhort you to fulfill what you have vowed, but even forbid you: if perhaps your wife refused to undertake this with you through weakness of mind or of flesh. For such things are not to be vowed by married people except by common consent and will; and if it has been done too hastily, the rashness is rather to be corrected than the promise paid. For God does not exact it if someone has vowed something that belongs to another; rather he forbids usurping what belongs to another. For the divine sentence on this matter has been pronounced through the apostle: “The wife does not have power over her own body, but the husband; likewise the husband does not have power over his own body, but the wife.” By the name of “body” he meant sex. But since I hear that she is so ready to dedicate continence to God that she would be hindered only if she were compelled to render you the debt by conjugal right, both of you render to God what both of you have vowed, so that there may be paid to him what you do not exact from each other. If continence is a virtue, as it is, why should the weaker sex be readier for it, when virtue (uirtus) seems rather to be named from man (uir), as the likeness of the words suggests? Do not, then, being a man, shrink from a virtue which a woman is ready to undertake. Let your consent be an offering on the heavenly altar of the creator, and, concupiscence being conquered, let the bond of love be the stronger the holier it is. Let us rejoice over you in the abundant grace of Christ, excellent lords and deservedly honorable and longed-for children.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine plays on the Latin uirtus (“virtue”) and uir (“man”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 127.9 (CSEL 44:28–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-127-9).

## Letter 128.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-1
- Source: CSEL 44:30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholic bishops write to the tribune Marcellinus accepting his edict on the arrangements for the conference with the Donatists at Carthage.

### Latin text

Edicto spectabilitatis tuae, quo nostrae conlationis tranquillitati quietique seruandae et ueritati manifestandae muniendaeque consultum est, in omnibus nos consentire, sicut admonere dignatus es, per has litteras intimamus, hoc est de loco et tempore ipsius conlationis et de numero eorum, quos praesentes esse oportebit. consentimus etiam, ut hi, quibus conferendi delegamus officium, subscribant prosecutionibus suis inque illo scripto, quo eis hoc munus inponimus ratumque nos habituros, quod egerint, pollicemur, subscriptiones omnium nostrum non solum habeas factas uerum etiam, cum fiunt, ipse perspicias, admonituri quoque domino adiuuante populum Christianum, ut a conlationis loco quietis et tranquillitatis gratia suum abstineat omnino conuentum et ea, quae aguntur, non, cum aguntur, audire festinet, sed, conscripta ut cognoscat, expectet, sicut ea te prolaturum omnibus promisisti.

### English translation (Claude)

We inform you by this letter that we agree in all respects, as you deigned to advise, with the edict of Your Excellency by which provision has been made for preserving the tranquillity and quiet of our conference and for manifesting and securing the truth; that is, concerning the place and time of the conference itself and the number of those who are to be present. We agree also that those to whom we delegate the duty of conferring should sign their proceedings; and that, in the document by which we impose this charge on them and promise that we will hold as valid whatever they do, you should not only have the signatures of all of us made but also see them yourself as they are made. We will also, with the Lord's help, admonish the Christian people to keep their gatherings altogether away from the place of the conference for the sake of quiet and tranquillity, and not to hurry to hear what is done while it is being done, but to wait to learn it when it has been written down, since you have promised to publish it to all.

### Translation notes

- Written in the name of the Catholic bishops to the tribune Marcellinus before the Conference of Carthage (411).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 128.1 (CSEL 44:30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-1).

## Letter 128.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-2
- Source: CSEL 44:30–32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholic bishops pledge to give up their sees if the Donatists prove their case, and offer the Donatist bishops their episcopal rank if they join Catholic unity.

### Latin text

Illo etiam ueritate confisi nos uinculo condicionis obstringimus, ut, si nobis hi, cum quibus agimus, demonstrare potuerint, cum secundum dei promissa populi Christiani usquequaque crescendo iam magnam partem orbis implerent et in cetera dilatarentur implenda, subito ecclesiam Christi nescio quorum, quos isti accusant, peccatorum perisse contagio et in sola remansisse parte Donati, si hoc, ut dictum est, demonstrare potuerint, nullos apud eos honores episcopalis muneris requiremus, sed eorum sequemur pro sola aeterna salute consilium, quibus tanti gratiam beneficii pro cognita ueritate debebimus. si autem nos potius ualuerimus ostendere ecclesiam Christi omnium non solum Africanarum uerum etiam transmarinarum prouinciarum multarumque gentium spatia feracissima populorum copia iam tenentem et, sicut scriptum est, toto mundo fructificantem atque crescentem nullorum hominum sibi commixtorum peccatis perire potuisse, si denique ipsorum, quos tunc accusare uoluerunt potius quam conuincere ualuerunt, quaestionem demonstrauerimus esse finitam, quamuis non in eis ecclesiae causa consistat, et Caecilianum innocentem illos autem uiolentos et calumniosos esse iudicatos ab eo imperatore, ad cuius examen criminationes suas ultro accusando miserunt, postremo si, quicquid de peccatis quorumlibet hominum dixerint, uel humanis documentis uel diuinis probauerimus aut eorum innocentiam falsis criminibus appetitam aut Christi ecclesiam, cuius communioni cohaeremus, nullis eorum delictis esse destructam, sic eius nobiscum teneant unitatem, ut non solum uiam salutis inueniant, sed nec honorem episcopatus amittant. neque enim in eis diuinae sacramenta ueritatis sed commenta humani detestamur erroris, quibus sublatis fraternum pectus amplectimur Christiana nobis caritate coniunctum, quod nunc dolemus dissensione diabolica separatum.

### English translation (Claude)

Trusting in the truth, we also bind ourselves by this condition. If those with whom we are dealing can demonstrate that, when according to God's promises the Christian peoples, growing everywhere, were already filling a great part of the world and spreading to fill the rest, the church of Christ suddenly perished through the contagion of the sins of I know not what people, whom they accuse, and remained only in the party of Donatus: if, as has been said, they can demonstrate this, we will seek no honors of episcopal office among them, but will follow their counsel for the sake of eternal salvation alone, owing them gratitude for so great a benefit, the knowledge of the truth. But if we, rather, are able to show that the church of Christ, which already holds, with an abundance of peoples, the most fruitful territories not only of all the African but also of the overseas provinces and of many nations, and, as it is written, bears fruit and grows in the whole world, could not perish through the sins of any men mixed with it; if, finally, we demonstrate that the question of those very men whom they then wished to accuse rather than were able to convict has been settled (although the cause of the church does not rest on them), and that Caecilian was judged innocent and they violent and slanderous by the emperor to whose examination they themselves sent their charges as accusers; lastly, if, whatever they say about the sins of any men, we prove by human or divine documents either that those men's innocence was assailed by false charges or that the church of Christ, to whose communion we adhere, was not destroyed by any of their offenses: then let them hold its unity with us in such a way that they not only find the way of salvation but do not lose the honor of the episcopate either. For in them we detest not the sacraments of divine truth but the fictions of human error; when these are removed, we embrace a brother's heart, joined to us by Christian love, which we now grieve to see separated by diabolical dissension.

### Scripture references

- Col 1:6: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 128.2 (CSEL 44:30–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-2).

## Letter 128.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-3
- Source: CSEL 44:32–33
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholic bishops propose that former Donatist bishops share sees with Catholic bishops, or that both resign for the sake of unity.

### Latin text

Poterit quippe unusquisque nostrum honoris sibi socio copulato uicissim sedere eminentius sicut peregrino episcopo iuxta considente collega. hoc cum alternis basilicis utrimque conceditur, uterque ab alterutro honore mutuo praeuenitur, quia, ubi perceptio caritatis dilatauerit corda, possessio pacis non fit angusta, ut uno eorum defuncto deinceps iam singulis singuli pristino more succedant. nec nouum aliquid fiet; nam hoc ab ipsius separationis exordio in eis, qui damnato nefariae discissionis errore unitatis dulcedinem uel sero sapuerunt, catholica dilectio custodiuit. aut si forte Christiani populi singulis delectantur episcopis et duorum consortium inusitata rerum facie tolerare non possunt, utrique de medio secedamus et ecclesiis in singulis damnata schismatis causa in unitate pacifica constitutis ab his, qui singuli in ecclesiis singulis inuenientur, unitati factae per loca necessaria singuli constituantur episcopi. quid enim dubitemus redemptori nostro sacrificium istius humilitatis offerre? an uero ille de caelis in membra humana descendit, ut membra eius essemus, et nos, ne ipsa eius membra crudeli diuisione lanientur, de cathedris descendere formidamus? propter nos nihil sufficientius quam Christiani fideles et oboedientes sumus; hoc ergo semper simus. episcopi autem propter Christianos populos ordinamur; quod ergo Christianis populis ad Christianam pacem prodest, hoc de nostro episcopatu faciamus. si serui utiles sumus, cur domini aeternis lucris pro nostris temporalibus sublimitatibus inuidemus? episcopalis dignitas fructuosior nobis erit, si gregem Christi magis deposita collegerit quam retenta disperserit; nam qua fronte in futuro saeculo promissum a Christo sperabimus honorem, si Christianam in hoc saeculo noster honor impedit unitatem?

### English translation (Claude)

For each of us, joining to himself a partner in honor, will be able to sit in the more eminent place by turns, as when a visiting bishop sits beside his colleague. When this is granted on both sides in alternate basilicas, each is anticipated by the other in mutual honor, because, where the reception of love has enlarged hearts, the possession of peace does not become cramped; and when one of them dies, thereafter single bishops will succeed single bishops in the former manner. Nor will anything new be done; for Catholic love has observed this from the very beginning of the separation in the case of those who, having condemned the error of wicked division, have tasted the sweetness of unity, even if late. Or if perhaps the Christian peoples delight in single bishops and cannot bear the partnership of two, an unaccustomed sight, let us both withdraw from the midst; and, when the cause of schism has been condemned and the churches established in peaceful unity, let single bishops be appointed where necessary for the unity that has been made, by those who will be found as single bishops in single churches. For why should we hesitate to offer our Redeemer the sacrifice of this humility? Or did he descend from heaven into human members so that we might be his members, and do we fear to descend from our chairs, lest his very members be torn apart by cruel division? For our own sakes nothing is more sufficient than that we be faithful and obedient Christians; let us always be this, then. But we are ordained bishops for the sake of the Christian peoples; whatever, then, benefits the Christian peoples for Christian peace, let us do that with our episcopate. If we are useful servants, why do we begrudge our Lord eternal gains for the sake of our temporal eminence? The episcopal dignity will be more fruitful to us if, laid down, it gathers the flock of Christ, rather than if, retained, it scatters it. For with what face shall we hope in the world to come for the honor promised by Christ, if in this world our honor hinders Christian unity?

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:7: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 12:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 17:10: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 128.3 (CSEL 44:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-3).

## Letter 128.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-4
- Source: CSEL 44:33–34
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops ask that the Donatists be reconciled, noting their own lenient reception of the Maximianists, and the letter is signed by Aurelius of Carthage and Silvanus of Summa.

### Latin text

Haec propterea praestantiae tuae scribenda curauimus, ut et per te innotescant omnibus. postulamus, ut in adiutorio domini dei nostri, quo admonente ista promittimus et quo adiuuante nos implere posse confidimus, etiam ante conlationem, si fieri potest, corda hominum uel infirma uel dura pia caritas aut sanet aut edomet ac sic iam pacificis mentibus non resistamus manifestissimae ueritati et disputationem nostram uel praecedamus concordia uel sequamur. neque enim desperare debemus, si recolunt beatos esse pacificos, quoniam ipsi filii dei uocabuntur, multo dignius et facilius eos uelle, ut pars Donati uniuerso orbi Christiano reconcilietur, quam uniuersus orbis Christianus a parte Donati rebaptizetur, cum praesertim de Maximiani sacrilego et damnato schismate uenientes, quos etiam terrenarum potestatum iussionibus insectando emendare curarunt, tanta dilectione quaesierint, ut nec baptismum ab eis datum rescindere auderent et quosdam eorum damnatos sine ulla honoris eorum deminutione susciperent, quosdam uero in illius discissionis societate inpollutos fuisse censerent. quorum inter se concordiae non inuidemus; sed eos certe oportet aduertere, quam pie tanto studio ramum a se fractum radix catholica inquirit, si ramus ipse similiter a se paruum fragmen incisum sic colligere laborauit. [Et alia manu:] Optamus te, fili, in domino bene ualere. Aurelius episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Carthaginensis huic epistulae subscripsi. [Item alia manu:] Siluanus senex ecclesiae Summensis subscripsi.

### English translation (Claude)

We have taken care to write this to Your Excellency so that through you it may become known to all. We ask that, with the help of the Lord our God, at whose prompting we make these promises and with whose help we trust we can fulfill them, pious love may, even before the conference if possible, either heal or tame the hearts of men, whether weak or hard; and so, with minds now at peace, may we not resist the most manifest truth, and may we either precede our debate with concord or follow it with concord. For we ought not to despair, if they remember that the peacemakers are blessed, since they shall be called children of God, that they would much more fittingly and easily wish that the party of Donatus be reconciled to the whole Christian world than that the whole Christian world be rebaptized by the party of Donatus; especially since they sought out with such love those coming from the sacrilegious and condemned schism of Maximian, whom they even took care to correct by pursuing them with the orders of earthly powers, that they did not dare to annul the baptism given by them, and received some of the condemned without any loss of their honor, and judged certain others to have been unpolluted in the fellowship of that division. We do not begrudge them their concord among themselves; but they ought certainly to notice how piously and with what zeal the Catholic root seeks out the branch broken off from it, if the branch itself likewise labored so hard to gather a small fragment cut off from it. [And in another hand:] We wish you good health in the Lord, son. I, Aurelius, bishop of the Catholic Church of Carthage, have signed this letter. [Likewise in another hand:] I, Silvanus, senior bishop, of the church of Summa, have signed.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Senior bishop” (senex) is the title of the primate of Numidia.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 128.4 (CSEL 44:33–34; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-128-4).

## Letter 129.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-1
- Source: CSEL 44:34
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholic bishops express concern to Marcellinus that the Donatists' wish to attend the conference in full numbers may cause disorder, while hoping it will lead to unity.

### Latin text

Multum nos sollicitos reddidit notoria uel litterae fratrum nostrorum, quos cupimus ad catholicam pacem a perniciosa dissensione conuerti, quod edicto nobilitatis tuae, quo ipsius disputationis nostrae tranquillitati quietique prouidisti, consentire noluerunt, ne forte etiamsi non omnes aliqui tamen eorum per multitudinis tumultum seu strepitum conlationem, quae pacifica et pacata esse debet, impediant. atque utinam ipsos non pertemptet ista cogitatio et nos potius fallat ista suspicio! et ideo si uelint omnes esse praesentes, ut, cum eis uisum fuerit, congregatis illuc etiam nobis simul inde egrediamur concordes atque pacati et schismatica diuisione correcta fraterno unitatis Christi uinculo obstricti mirantibus et gaudentibus omnibus bonis dolente autem solo diabolo et similibus eius pariter in ecclesiam ad gratiarum actionem laudesque deo reddendas ardentissima et lucidissima caritate pergamus!

### English translation (Claude)

The notice, or letter, of our brothers, whom we desire to be converted from pernicious dissension to Catholic peace, has made us very anxious, because they refused to agree to the edict of Your Nobility by which you provided for the tranquillity and quiet of our debate; we fear that, if not all, at least some of them may by the tumult or din of a multitude hinder the conference, which ought to be peaceable and peaceful. Would that such a thought may not tempt them, and that this suspicion of ours may rather prove mistaken! And so, if they want all to be present, may it be in order that, when it seems good to them, with us too assembled there, we may go out from there together, in concord and at peace, and, the schismatic division corrected and bound by the brotherly bond of Christ's unity, while all good people marvel and rejoice and only the devil and those like him grieve, may proceed together into the church to give thanks and render praises to God with most ardent and most shining love!

### Translation notes

- Written in the name of the Catholic bishops to the tribune Marcellinus before the Conference of Carthage (411).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.1 (CSEL 44:34; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-1).

## Letter 129.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-2
- Source: CSEL 44:34–35
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops argue from Luke 24:46–47 that the gospel attests both Christ's resurrection and the church's spread through all nations.

### Latin text

Quid enim magnum est, si oculus pacatus adtendat et cogitatio Christiana non deserat considerare et uidere remotis humanis criminationibus seu ueris seu falsis in eis litteris ecclesiam esse quaerendam, ubi Christus redemptor eius innotuit? nam sicut non audimus contra Christum eos, qui dicunt corpus eius de sepulcro furatum a discipulis, sic non debemus audire contra eius ecclesiam eos, qui dicunt non eam esse nisi in solis Afris et Afrorum paucissimis sociis. apostolus quippe dicit, quoniam ueraces Christiani membra sunt Christi. sicut ergo non credimus furto cuiusquam perisse carnem Christi mortuam de sepulcro, sic credere non debemus peccato cuiusquam uiua eius membra perisse de mundo. non est itaque difficile, quoniam caput est Christus et corpus ecclesia, simul in euangelio commendatum uidere et caput contra calumnias Iudaeorum et corpus contra criminationes haereticorum. nam quod legitur: Oportebat Christum pati et resurgere a mortuis tertio die, contra eos est, qui dicunt mortuum de sepulcro esse sublatum; quod autem sequitur: Et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipientibus ab Hierusalem, contra eos est, qui dicunt non esse ecclesiam in orbe terrarum, ut uno breui capitulo paucisque uerbis et inimicus capitis et inimicus corporis repellatur et, si fideliter adtenderit, corrigatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For what great thing is it, if a peaceful eye attends and Christian thought does not fail to consider and see, setting aside human accusations whether true or false, that the church is to be sought in those writings in which Christ its Redeemer was made known? For just as we do not listen, against Christ, to those who say that his body was stolen from the tomb by the disciples, so we ought not to listen, against his church, to those who say that it exists only among the Africans and a very few associates of the Africans. For the apostle says that true Christians are members of Christ. Just as, then, we do not believe that Christ's dead flesh was lost from the tomb through anyone's theft, so we ought not to believe that his living members have been lost from the world through anyone's sin. It is therefore not difficult, since Christ is the head and the church the body, to see both commended together in the gospel: the head against the calumnies of the Jews and the body against the accusations of heretics. For what is read, “It was necessary for Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day,” is against those who say that he was carried off dead from the tomb; and what follows, “and that repentance and remission of sins be preached in his name among all nations, beginning from Jerusalem,” is against those who say that the church is not in the whole world; so that by one short passage and a few words both the enemy of the head and the enemy of the body are repelled, and, if he attends faithfully, corrected.

### Scripture references

- Matt 28:13: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:27: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:18: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:46: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:47: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The “calumnies of the Jews” refers to the story in Matt 28:13 that the disciples stole the body; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.2 (CSEL 44:34–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-2).

## Letter 129.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-3
- Source: CSEL 44:35–36
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops hope that the Donatists, having searched the Scriptures, will see that they foretell a worldwide church and none confined to Africa.

### Latin text

Nam tenere istas inimicitias fratres nostros tanto magis dolemus, quanto magis eos constat easdem scripturas nobiscum tenere, quibus haec apertissima testimonia continentur. Iudaei quippe, qui negant resurrexisse Christum, saltem non accipiunt euangelium, isti autem fratres nostri utriusque testamenti auctoritate deuincti sunt et tamen criminari nos uolunt de euangelio tradito et nolunt ei credere recitato. sed nunc fortasse huius conlationis cura suscepta diligentius perscrutati sunt scripturas sanctas et, quia in eis innumerabilia testimonia reppererunt, quibus promissa est ecclesia futura in omnibus gentibus et toto orbe terrarum, sicut eam reddi et praesentari coepisse in euangelio et in epistulis apostolicis et in actibus apostolorum uidemus, ubi et ipsa loca et ciuitates et prouinciae leguntur, per quas creuit incipiens ab Hierusalem, ut inde se etiam in Africam non migrando sed crescendo diffunderet, non autem inuenerunt aliquod testimonium diuinorum eloquiorum, ubi dictum est eam perituram de ceteris partibus mundi et in sola Africa Donati parte mansuram et uiderunt, quam sit absurdum pro illa, quae fuerat peritura, tot testimonia diuina recitari. pro ea uero, quae, sicut putant, fuerat domino placitura, nullum eius testimonium reperiri, haec forte cogitantes ad finiendas uanas et perniciosas et saluti aeternae contrarias inimicitias ad locum conlationis nostrae omnes conuenire uoluerunt, non ut tumultus nouus oriatur, sed ut uetusta discordia finiatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For we grieve that our brothers keep up these enmities all the more because it is evident that they hold with us the same Scriptures in which these most plain testimonies are contained. The Jews, indeed, who deny that Christ rose, at least do not accept the gospel; but these brothers of ours are bound by the authority of both testaments, and yet they want to accuse us of handing over the gospel, and refuse to believe it when it is read. But now perhaps, having undertaken the care of this conference, they have examined the holy Scriptures more diligently. They have found in them innumerable testimonies by which the church was promised to be in all nations and in the whole world, as we see that it began to be delivered and presented in the gospel and in the apostolic letters and in the Acts of the Apostles, where the very places and cities and provinces are named through which it grew, beginning from Jerusalem, so that from there it spread even into Africa, not by migrating but by growing; but they have not found any testimony of the divine oracles where it is said that it would perish from the other parts of the world and remain only in Africa in the party of Donatus. And they have seen how absurd it is that so many divine testimonies should be read on behalf of a church that was to perish, while not a single testimony of his can be found on behalf of the one which, as they think, was to please the Lord. Thinking these things, perhaps, they have wished all to come together to the place of our conference to end enmities that are vain and pernicious and contrary to eternal salvation, not so that a new tumult may arise but so that an old discord may be ended.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The charge of “handing over the gospel” refers to the Donatist accusation that Catholic bishops descended from traditors. The statement about the Jews is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.3 (CSEL 44:35–36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-3).

## Letter 129.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-4
- Source: CSEL 44:36–37
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops defend imperial laws against heretics by the example of ancient kings and the Donatists' own appeal to Constantine, who acquitted Caecilian and Felix of Aptunga.

### Latin text

Nam et illud, quo in nos solent grauiter inritari, quod reges terrae, quos tanto ante praedictum est Christo domino seruituros, leges contra haereticos et schismaticos pro catholica pace constituunt, credimus quod aliquando cogitauerint non esse culpandum, quia et antiqui reges non solum gentis Hebraicae sed etiam alienigenae, ne quisquam contra deum Israhel, hoc est uerum deum non tantum faceret, sed uel diceret aliquid, omnes regni sui populos praeceptis minacissimis tenuerunt et maiores istorum ipsam Caeciliani causam, unde nata est ista dissensio, ad Constantinum imperatorem per Anulinum proconsulem accusando miserunt, quod utique non ob aliud uidentur fecisse, nisi ut imperator Constantinus contra eos, qui superati essent, eis, qui superassent, aliquid regali auctoritate decerneret, totamque ipsam causam potuerunt — et forte fecerunt ipsius conlationis necessitate — archiuis publicis perscrutatis inuenire olim esse finitam post ecclesiastica iudicia, quibus absolutus est Caecilianus, illo etiam imperatore iudicante, ad cuius examen rem totam et primo miserunt et postea perduxerunt. ibi potuerant etiam causam Felicis Aptungensis, ordinatoris Caeciliani, quem malorum omnium fontem in concilio suo dixerant, cognoscente Aeliano proconsule ex praecepto eiusdem imperatoris inuenire purgatam.

### English translation (Claude)

For as to the thing by which they are usually gravely provoked against us, that the kings of the earth, who it was foretold so long before would serve Christ the Lord, establish laws against heretics and schismatics for the sake of Catholic peace, we believe they have at some time reflected that this is not to be blamed. For the ancient kings too, not only of the Hebrew nation but foreigners as well, restrained all the peoples of their kingdoms with most threatening commands, lest anyone should not only do but even say anything against the God of Israel, that is, the true God; and their own forefathers sent the very case of Caecilian, from which this dissension arose, to the emperor Constantine through the proconsul Anulinus, as accusers, which they certainly seem to have done for no other reason than that the emperor Constantine might decree something by royal authority against those who had lost, in favor of those who had won. And they could find, by searching the public archives (and perhaps they have done so because of this very conference), that the whole case was settled long ago, after the ecclesiastical judgments by which Caecilian was acquitted, with that emperor too giving judgment, to whose examination they first sent the whole matter and later brought it. There they could also have found that the case of Felix of Aptunga, Caecilian's ordainer, whom they had called in their council the source of all evils, was cleared when the proconsul Aelianus heard it by order of the same emperor.

### Scripture references

- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:29: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:26: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The bishops' defense of imperial coercion of heretics and schismatics is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.4 (CSEL 44:36–37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-4).

## Letter 129.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-5
- Source: CSEL 44:37–38
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops argue that the Donatists' own treatment of the Maximianists, including appeals to the state and acceptance of their baptism, condemns their case against the Catholics.

### Latin text

Quamquam et hoc si adtenderunt et, quod facile fuerat, aduerterunt in scripturis sanctis ecclesiam Christi permixtis zizaniis et palea et piscibus malis futuram esse promissam usque ad tempus messis, uentilationis et litoris, utique cogitare potuerunt, etiamsi malam causam Caecilianus et coepiscopi eius habuissent, nihil eos praeiudicare potuisse orbi Christiano, quem deus paucis credentibus tanto ante promisit et nunc multis uidentibus reddidit, nisi forte plus contra ecclesiam ualuit homo peccans quam pro ecclesia deus iurans et iniquitas, quod amisit, quam ueritas, quod promisit. haec sentire quam sit stultum et impium, iam fortasse uiderunt; cogitauerunt quoque damnatos a se Maximianistas, Primiani damnatores, per potestates terrenas etiam de basilicis curasse pellendos et ibi certius exemplo suo recentiore didicerunt non esse peccatum, si tale aliquid ecclesia contra rebelles suos ab huius modi potestatibus postulat; et quod aliquos ex damnatis postea receperunt, quos cum damnarent, aliis etiam plurimis in eadem societate schismatis constitutis dilationem dederunt, quos in Maximiani sacrilegi surculi communione inpollutos mansisse dixerunt, et baptismum uel a damnatis uel a sociis eorum quamuis foris in schismate datum rescindere atque iterare non ausi sunt, satis utique iudicarunt ea, quae contra nos dicebant exemplo suo esse damnata et credendum est. quod iam intellegant, quam sit indignum, quam intolerabile, ut, cum sedeant in cathedris episcopalibus cum istis et cum ipso simul Primiano damnatores eius et damnati in causa eius, ut sit pax in parte Donati, de Caeciliano infametur orbis Christianus, ne in pace uiuat unitas Christi.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet, if they have attended to this too, and noticed, as was easy, that in the holy Scriptures the church of Christ was promised to be mixed with tares and chaff and bad fish until the time of harvest, winnowing, and the shore, they could certainly have reflected that, even if Caecilian and his fellow bishops had had a bad case, they could not have prejudiced the Christian world at all, which God promised so long before to a few who believed and has now delivered to many who see it; unless perhaps a sinning man had more power against the church than God swearing on its behalf, and iniquity in what it lost more than truth in what it promised. How foolish and impious it is to think this they have perhaps already seen. They have reflected too that they took care to have the Maximianists, whom they had condemned, the condemners of Primian, driven even from their basilicas through earthly powers; and there they learned more surely, by their own more recent example, that it is not a sin if the church asks such powers for something of this kind against its rebels. And since they afterward received back some of the condemned, and, when they condemned them, gave a delay to very many others established in the same fellowship of schism, whom they said had remained unpolluted in communion with the sacrilegious sapling of Maximian, and did not dare to annul and repeat the baptism given either by the condemned or by their associates, though given outside in schism, they certainly judged clearly enough that the things they used to say against us were condemned by their own example. And it is to be believed that they now understand how unworthy, how intolerable it is that, while Primian's condemners and those condemned in his case sit with these men and with Primian himself in episcopal chairs, so that there may be peace in the party of Donatus, the Christian world should be defamed on account of Caecilian, so that the unity of Christ may not live in peace.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:16: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 22:18: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “God swearing” refers to God's sworn promise to Abraham of blessing to all nations (Gen 22:16–18).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.5 (CSEL 44:37–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-5).

## Letter 129.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-6
- Source: CSEL 44:38
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops argue that the Donatists' numbers could be shown by their signatures, and that a full assembly would only hinder the conference.

### Latin text

Haec omnia fortasse cogitantes et dei timore permoti omnes conlationis loco adesse uoluerunt non tumultus dispositione sed pacis. quod enim propterea se uniuersos adesse dixerunt, ut eorum numerus appareat, quoniam eos paucos esse aduersarii sui saepe mentiti sunt, hoc si aliquando a nostris dictum est, de his locis dici uerissime potuit, ubi nostrorum coepiscoporum et clericorum atque laicorum longe maior est numerus et maxime in proconsulari prouincia, quamquam excepta Numidia consulari etiam in ceteris prouinciis Africanis nostrorum numero facillime superentur aut certe in comparatione omnium gentium, per quas catholica communio dilatatur, eos esse paucissimos rectissime dicimus. sed nunc si numerum suum innotescere uoluissent, nonne ordinatius atque tranquillius innotesceret per eorum subscriptiones, quas ut mandato suo te cernente subiungant, edicto admonuisti? quid sibi ergo uult quod conlationis loco omnes adesse desiderant? si enim pacem non cogitant, quid non perturbabunt locuturi aut quid illic facient tacituri? nam etiamsi clamor non sit, solus susurrus ipse multorum satis magnum strepitum faciet, quo impediatur illa conlatio.

### English translation (Claude)

Thinking perhaps of all these things and moved by the fear of God, they wanted all to be present at the place of the conference, not with a plan for tumult but for peace. As for their saying that they would all be present so that their number might appear, since their adversaries had often lied that they were few: if this was ever said by our people, it could be said most truly of those places where the number of our fellow bishops and clergy and laity is far greater, and especially in the proconsular province; although, except in consular Numidia, they are very easily outnumbered by ours in the other African provinces too; or certainly we say most rightly that, in comparison with all the nations through which the Catholic communion is spread, they are very few. But now, if they had wished their number to be known, would it not have been made known in a more orderly and tranquil way through their signatures, which you directed in your edict that they should append to their mandate in your sight? What then is the meaning of their desire that all be present at the place of the conference? For if they are not thinking of peace, what will they not disturb if they speak, or what will they do there if they keep silent? For even if there is no shouting, the mere whispering of many will make a great enough din to hinder that conference.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.6 (CSEL 44:38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-6).

## Letter 129.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-7
- Source: CSEL 44:38–40
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops agree that all the Donatists may attend, while limiting their own numbers, and hope that the assembly will end in brotherly unity.

### Latin text

Quid est autem, quod in notoria sua ponendum putarunt ideo se iuste flagitasse, ut omnes adessent, quia omnes conuenti sunt, ut uenirent, quasi possent eligi pauci, qui adesse deberent, nisi ab omnibus, qui uenissent, ut eorum electioni te praesente subscriberent ac sic in paucis omnes essent, cum ab omnibus pauci electi essent? aut ergo tumultus ab eis cogitatur aut pax. quorum illud optamus, illud cauemus et ideo, ne forte, quod absit, hoc praeparetur potius, quod cauemus, quam quod optamus, sic consentimus adesse omnes illos, ut tamen a nobis tantus adsit numerus, quantus tuae spectabilitati sufficere uisus est, ut tumultuosum per turbas si quid emerserit, nonnisi eis recte inputetur, in quorum parte praesens fuerit ad rem, quae a paucis agenda est, omnino superflua multitudo. si autem, quod uotis omnibus cupimus, quod ardenter appetimus, quod suppliciter a domino deprecamur, causa unitatis faciendae illa erit necessaria multitudo, cum uoluerint, omnes aderimus et ad tantum bonum illo adiuuante, qui hoc donat, alacriter conuolabimus dicentes: Fratres nostri estis non iam eis, qui nos detestantur, sed qui odio finito amplectuntur, ut nomen domini honorificetur et appareat illis in iucunditate iam nobiscum experientibus, quam bonum sit et iucundum fratres habitantes in unum. [Et alia manu:] Optamus te, fili, in deo bene ualere. [Item alia manu:] Aurelius episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Carthaginensis subscripsi. [Item:] Siluanus primae sedis prouinciae Numidiae subscripsi.

### English translation (Claude)

And what of the statement they thought fit to put in their notice, that they had justly demanded that all be present because all had been summoned to come; as if the few who were to be present could be chosen otherwise than by all who had come, so that they might sign their election in your presence, and thus all would be present in the few, since the few would have been chosen by all? Either tumult, then, is in their thoughts, or peace. Of these we desire the latter and guard against the former; and therefore, lest perhaps (may it not be so) what we guard against should be prepared rather than what we desire, we agree that all of them be present, but in such a way that on our side only as many be present as seemed sufficient to Your Excellency; so that, if anything tumultuous should arise through the crowds, it may rightly be imputed only to those on whose side a multitude was present, wholly superfluous for a matter to be conducted by a few. But if, as we desire with all our prayers, as we ardently seek, as we humbly beg of the Lord, that multitude will be needed for making unity, then, when they wish, we will all be present and will fly eagerly to so great a good with the help of him who grants it, saying: “You are our brothers,” no longer to those who detest us, but to those who, hatred ended, embrace us, “that the name of the Lord may be honored and may appear to them in gladness,” as they now experience with us how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in unity. [And in another hand:] We wish you good health in God, son. [Likewise in another hand:] I, Aurelius, bishop of the Catholic Church of Carthage, have signed. [Likewise:] I, Silvanus, of the primatial see of the province of Numidia, have signed.

### Scripture references

- Isa 66:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 133:1 (132:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 66:5 in its Greek (LXX) form, as in 108.3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 129.7 (CSEL 44:38–40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-129-7).

## Letter 130.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-1
- Source: CSEL 44:40–41
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his letter to the widow Proba on prayer, praising her concern to pray night and day.

### Latin text

Et petisse te et promisisse me recolens, ut de orando deo ad te aliquid scriberem, ubi tribuente ipso, quem oramus, tempus facultasque concessa est, oportuit, ut debitum meum iam iamque persoluerem et pio studio tuo in Christi caritate seruirem. quam me autem laetificauerit ipsa petitio tua, in qua cognoui, quantam rei tantae curam geras, uerbis explicare non possum. quod enim maius oportuit esse negotium uiduitatis tuae quam persistere in orationibus nocte ac die secundum apostoli admonitionem? ille quippe ait: Quae autem uere uidua est et desolata, sperauit in domino et persistit in orationibus nocte ac die. unde mirum uideri potest, cum sis secundum hoc saeculum nobilis, diues tantaeque familiae mater et ideo licet uidua non tamen desolata, quo modo occupauerit cor tuum praecipueque sibi uindicauerit orandi cura, nisi quia prudenter intellegis, quod in hoc mundo et in hac uita nulla anima possit esse secura.

### English translation (Claude)

Remembering that you asked, and that I promised, that I would write something to you about praying to God, I ought, now that time and opportunity have been granted by him to whom we pray, to pay my debt at once and serve your devout zeal in the love of Christ. How much your request itself gladdened me, for in it I learned how great a care you take for so great a matter, I cannot express in words. For what ought to be the greater business of your widowhood than to persevere in prayers night and day, according to the apostle's admonition? He says: "She who is truly a widow and desolate has set her hope on the Lord and perseveres in prayers night and day." Hence it may seem wonderful that, since by the standards of this world you are noble and rich, and the mother of so great a family, and therefore, though a widow, still not desolate, the care of praying should have taken hold of your heart and claimed it above all for itself, unless it is because you wisely understand that in this world and in this life no soul can be secure.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 5:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 130 is addressed to Proba, a Roman noblewoman and widow. Quotation: 1 Tim 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.1 (CSEL 44:40–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-1).

## Letter 130.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-2
- Source: CSEL 44:41–42
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God, for whom it is easy to save the rich, has inspired Proba's concern to pray, and the rich must hope in God, not in riches.

### Latin text

Proinde qui tibi eam cogitationem dedit, profecto facit, quod discipulis suis non pro se ipsis sed pro humano genere contristatis et desperantibus quemquam posse saluari, posteaquam ab illo audierunt facilius esse camelum intrare per foramen acus quam diuitem in regnum caelorum, mirifica et misericordissima pollicitatione respondit deo esse facile, quod hominibus inpossibile est. cui ergo facile est, ut etiam diues intret in regnum caelorum, inspirauit tibi piam sollicitudinem, de qua me consulendum putasti, quonam modo tibi esset orandum. ille namque cum etiam hic adhuc esset in carne, in regnum caelorum Zacchaeum diuitem misit et resurrectione atque ascensione glorificatus multos postea diuites impertito sancto spiritu fecit huius saeculi contemptores et finita diuitiarum cupiditate ditiores. quo modo enim tu sic studeres orare dominum, nisi sperares in eo? quo modo autem sperares in eo, si sperares in incerto diuitiarum et contemneres praeceptum saluberrimum, quod apostolus ait: Praecipe diuitibus huius saeculi non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum; diuites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore he who gave you that concern is surely doing what he did for his disciples when they were saddened, not for themselves but for the human race, and despaired that anyone could be saved, after they heard from him that it is easier for a camel to enter through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven: he answered with a wonderful and most merciful promise that what is impossible for human beings is easy for God. He, then, for whom it is easy that even a rich man should enter the kingdom of heaven, has inspired in you the devout anxiety about which you thought I should be consulted, namely how you ought to pray. For even while he was still here in the flesh, he sent the rich man Zacchaeus into the kingdom of heaven; and after he was glorified by his resurrection and ascension, he imparted the Holy Spirit and afterward made many rich people despisers of this world, richer once their greed for riches was ended. For how would you be so eager to pray to the Lord if you did not hope in him? And how would you hope in him if you hoped in the uncertainty of riches and despised the most wholesome precept that the apostle gives: "Command the rich of this world not to be proud nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches, but in the living God, who gives us all things richly to enjoy; let them be rich in good works, give readily, share, lay up for themselves a good foundation for the future, that they may lay hold of the true life"?

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:26: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 19:9: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 19:23–26 (cf. Mark 10:25–27); Zacchaeus, Luke 19:1–10; quotation of 1 Tim 6:17–19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.2 (CSEL 44:41–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-2).

## Letter 130.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-3
- Source: CSEL 44:42–43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: True consolation, like true life, is found not in riches or honors but in God, who makes people good and so happy.

### Latin text

Debes itaque prae amore huius uerae uitae etiam desolatam te reputare in hoc saeculo, in qualibet eius felicitate uerseris. nam sicut est illa uera uita, in cuius comparatione utique ista, quae multum amatur, quamlibet iucunda atque producta sit. nec uita dicenda est, sic est etiam solacium uerum, quod per prophetam promittit deus dicens: Dabo illis solacium uerum, pacem super pacem, sine quo solacio, quaecumque sunt terrena solacia, magis in eis desolatio quam consolatio reperitur. diuitiae quippe atque fastigia dignitatum ceteraque huius modi, quibus se felices putant esse mortales uerae illius felicitatis expertes, quid adferunt consolationis, cum sit eis non indigere quam eminere praestantius, quae plus excruciant adepta timore amissionis quam concupita adeptionis ardore? talibus bonis non fiunt homines boni, sed aliunde boni facti bene utendo faciunt, ut ista sint bona. non sunt ergo in his uera solacia sed ibi potius, ubi uera uita. nam inde necesse est fiat homo beatus, unde fit bonus.

### English translation (Claude)

You ought therefore, out of love for this true life, to count yourself desolate in this world, whatever prosperity of it you may enjoy. For just as that is the true life, in comparison with which this life that is so much loved, however pleasant and long it may be, should not even be called life, so also there is a true consolation, which God promises through the prophet, saying: "I will give them true consolation, peace upon peace"; without this consolation, whatever earthly consolations there are, desolation rather than consolation is found in them. For riches and the heights of office and other things of this kind, by which mortals who have no share in that true happiness think themselves happy, what consolation do they bring, since it is better not to need them than to excel in them, and since, once gained, they torment more by the fear of losing them than they did by the passion to gain them when they were desired? People do not become good by such goods; but having been made good from elsewhere, by using them well they make these things good. True consolations, then, are not in these things, but rather where true life is. For a person must become happy from the same source from which he becomes good.

### Scripture references

- Isa 57:18: quotation, medium confidence
- Isa 57:19: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The promise follows Isa 57:18–19 in the Old Latin (from the Septuagint).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.3 (CSEL 44:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/124-1/#p-130-3).

## Letter 130.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-4
- Source: CSEL 44:43–45
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Good friends console in this life, but since no one's heart is fully known, even this comfort is uncertain and judgment must be left to the Lord.

### Latin text

Homines autem boni etiam in hac uita uidentur praestare non parua solacia. nam si paupertas angit, si luctus maestificat: si dolor corporis inquietat, si contristat exilium, si ulla alia calamitas uexat, adsint boni homines, qui non solum gaudere cum gaudentibus uerum etiam flere cum flentibus norunt et salubriter adloqui et conloqui sciunt; plurimum illa aspera leniuntur, releuantur grauia, superantur aduersa. sed ille hoc in eis et per eos agit, qui spiritu suo bonos facit. contra si diuitiae circumfluant, nulla orbitas accidat, adsit sanitas carnis, incolumi habitetur in patria et cohabitent mali homines, in quibus nemo sit, cui fides habeatur, a quo non dolus, fraus, irae, discordiae, insidiae sustineantur atque timeantur, nonne illa omnia fiunt amara et dura nec aliquid laetum uel dulce est in eis? ita in quibuslibet rebus humanis nihil est homini amicum sine homine amico. sed quousque talis inuenitur, de cuius animo et moribus sit in hac uita certa securitas? nam sicut sibi quisque nemo alter alteri notus est et tamen nec sibi quisque ita notus est, ut sit de sua crastina conuersatione securus. proinde quamuis ex fructibus suis multi cognoscantur et alii quidem proximos bene uiuendo laetificent alii male uiuendo contristent, tamen propter humanorum animorum ignota et incerta rectissime apostolus admonet, ut non ante tempus quicquam iudicemus, donec ueniat dominus et inluminet abscondita tenebrarum et manifestet cogitationes cordis et tunc laus erit unicuique a deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Good people, however, seem to provide no small consolations even in this life. For if poverty pinches, if grief saddens, if bodily pain disturbs, if exile depresses, if any other calamity afflicts, let good people be present who know how not only to rejoice with those who rejoice but also to weep with those who weep, and know how to speak and converse helpfully; then those harsh things are greatly softened, heavy things lightened, adversities overcome. But it is he who makes them good by his Spirit who does this in them and through them. On the other hand, if riches abound, if no bereavement occurs, if bodily health is present, if one lives safely in one's homeland, but bad people live alongside, among whom there is no one who can be trusted, from whom deceit, fraud, anger, discord, and treachery are not endured and feared, do not all those things become bitter and hard, and is there anything glad or sweet in them? So in any human affairs whatever, nothing is friendly to a person without a friendly person. But how far can such a one be found, about whose mind and character there can be sure security in this life? For no one is known to another as each is known to himself, and yet no one is so well known even to himself as to be secure about his own conduct tomorrow. Therefore, although many are known by their fruits, and some gladden their neighbors by living well while others sadden them by living badly, yet because human minds are unknown and uncertain, the apostle very rightly admonishes us not to judge anything before the time, until the Lord comes and brings to light the hidden things of darkness and makes manifest the thoughts of the heart, and then each one will have praise from God.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:15: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:16: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 12:15; Matt 7:16; 1 Cor 4:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.4 (CSEL 44:43–45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-4).

## Letter 130.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-5
- Source: CSEL 44:45–47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In this dark life the Christian soul should count itself desolate and keep praying, looking to Scripture until it sees God in the true life to come, where prayer will give way to contemplation.

### Latin text

In his igitur uitae huius tenebris, in quibus peregrinamur a domino, quam diu per fidem ambulamus non per speciem, desolatam se debet anima Christiana deputare, ne desistat orare et scripturarum diuinarum sanctarumque sermoni tamquam lucernae in obscuro loco positae fidei oculum intendere, donec dies lucescat et lucifer oriatur in cordibus nostris. huius enim lucernae quidam fons ineffabilis lumen illud est, quod sic lucet in tenebris, ut non comprehendatur a tenebris, cui uidendo fide corda mundanda sunt. beati enim mundicordes, quia ipsi deum uidebunt, et: Scimus, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est. tunc erit uera uita post mortem uerumque solacium post desolationem. illa uita eximet animam nostram de morte et illud solacium oculos nostros a lacrimis et, quoniam ibi iam non erit ulla temptatio, ideo sequitur in eodem psalmo: Pedes meos a lapsu. porro si nulla temptatio, iam nulla oratio; non enim adhuc promissi boni expectatio sed redditi contemplatio. unde: Placebo, inquit, domino in regione uiuorum, ubi tunc erimus, non in deserto mortuorum, ubi nunc sumus. mortui enim estis, ait apostolus, et uita uestra abscondita est cum Christo in deo; cum Christus apparuerit, uita uestra, tunc et uos cum ipso apparebitis in gloria. haec est uera uita, quam iubentur bonis operibus adprehendere diuites, et ibi est uerum solacium, quo solacio nunc uidua desolata, etiam quae filios et nepotes habet et domum suam pie tractat, agens cum omnibus suis, ut ponant in deo spem suam, dicit tamen in oratione: Sitiuit tibi anima mea, quam multipliciter tibi caro mea in terra deserta et sine uia et sine aqua, quod est ista moribunda uita, quibuslibet mortalibus solaciis frequentetur, quibuslibet itinerantibus comitetur. quanta libet rerum copia cumuletur. nosti quippe ista omnia, quam incerta sint; et in illius promissae felicitatis comparatione quid essent, etiamsi incerta non essent?

### English translation (Claude)

In the darkness of this life, then, in which we are away from the Lord as long as we walk by faith and not by sight, the Christian soul ought to count itself desolate, so that it may not cease to pray, and may fix the eye of faith on the word of the divine and holy Scriptures as on a lamp set in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in our hearts. For the ineffable source of this lamp is that light which so shines in the darkness that the darkness does not comprehend it; and to see it, hearts must be cleansed by faith. For "blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God," and: "We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is." Then there will be true life after death and true consolation after desolation. That life will deliver our soul from death, and that consolation our eyes from tears; and since there will be no temptation there any longer, the same psalm therefore goes on: "my feet from falling." Now, if there is no temptation, there is no longer any prayer; for there will no longer be the expectation of the good promised, but the contemplation of the good bestowed. Hence it says: "I will please the Lord in the land of the living," where we shall then be, not in the wilderness of the dead, where we are now. "For you have died," says the apostle, "and your life is hidden with Christ in God; when Christ, your life, appears, then you also will appear with him in glory." This is the true life which the rich are commanded to lay hold of by good works, and there is the true consolation. For this consolation a desolate widow now longs; even one who has sons and grandsons and manages her household devoutly, taking care with all her family that they put their hope in God, nevertheless says in prayer: "My soul has thirsted for you; how manifoldly my flesh for you, in a land deserted, without a way and without water." This is this dying life, however crowded it may be with mortal consolations, however many companions accompany it on its journey, however great an abundance of things is heaped up. For you know how uncertain all these things are; and even if they were not uncertain, what would they be in comparison with that promised happiness?

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Pet 1:19: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:8 (114:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:9 (114:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:4: echo, medium confidence
- Ps 63:1 (62:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:6–7; 2 Pet 1:19; John 1:5; Matt 5:8; 1 John 3:2; Ps 116:8–9 (114:8–9 LXX); Col 3:3–4; 1 Tim 5:4 (echo); Ps 63:1 (62:2 LXX), in the Old Latin wording. The Latin of the last sentences is loosely constructed; the sense is that the widow longs for this consolation even amid her family.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.5 (CSEL 44:45–47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-5).

## Letter 130.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-6
- Source: CSEL 44:47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Proba should feel desolate even amid her family until she reaches the life of true consolation.

### Latin text

Haec dixi, quoniam sermonem meum uidua diues et nobilis et tantae familiae mater de oratione quaesisti, ut etiam tecum in hac uita permanentibus et obsequentibus tuis te sentias desolatam nondum utique adprehensa illa uita, ubi est uerum certumque solacium, ubi implebitur, quod in prophetia dictum est: Satiati sumus mane misericordia tua et exultauimus et iucundati sumus in omnibus diebus nostris. iucundati sumus pro diebus, quibus nos humiliasti, annis, quibus uidimus mala.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said this because you, a widow, rich and noble and the mother of so great a family, have asked me for a discourse on prayer: that you may feel yourself desolate even while your family stays with you in this life and serves you, since you have not yet laid hold of that life where there is true and certain consolation, where what was said in prophecy will be fulfilled: "We were satisfied in the morning with your mercy, and we rejoiced and were glad in all our days; we were glad for the days in which you humbled us, the years in which we saw evil."

### Scripture references

- Ps 90:14 (89:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 90:15 (89:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 90:14–15 (89:14–15 LXX), in the Old Latin wording.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.6 (CSEL 44:47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-6).

## Letter 130.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-7
- Source: CSEL 44:47–49
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A true widow must count herself desolate and not set her heart on pleasures, caring for the body only for the sake of health.

### Latin text

Antequam ergo ista consolatio ueniat, quantacumque temporalium bonorum felicitate circumfluas, ut persistas in orationibus nocte ac die, desolatam te esse memineris. non enim apostolus qualicumque uiduae tribuit hoc munus, sed quae uere, inquit, uidua est et desolata, sperauit in domino et persistit in orationibus nocte et die. quod uero sequitur, uigilantissime caue: Quae autem in deliciis agit, uiuens mortua est; agit enim homo in his, quae diligit, quae pro magno appetit, quibus beatum esse se credit. quapropter quod scriptura dixit de diuitiis: Diuitiae si adfluant, ne adponatis cor, hoc etiam de deliciis tibi dico: Deliciae si adfluant, ne adponas cor. non ideo te magni pendas, quod non desunt, quod affatim suppetunt, quod uelut ex fonte largissimo terrenae felicitatis fluunt. omnino haec in te despice atque contemne, ne in his quicquam requiras praeter integram corporis ualitudinem. haec enim contemnenda non est propter necessarios usus uitae huius, antequam mortale hoc induatur inmortalitate, hoc est uera et perfecta et perpetua sanitate, quae non terrena infirmitate deficiens corruptibili uoluptate reficitur, sed caelesti firmitate persistens aeterna incorruptibilitate uegetatur. nam et ipse apostolus: Carnis, inquit, prouidentiam ne feceritis in concupiscentiis, quia gerimus curam carnis sed ad necessitatem salutis. nemo enim umquam carnem suam odio habuit, sicut ipse itidem dicit. hinc est, quod et Timotheum nimium, sicut apparet, corporis castigatorem admonet, ut modico uino utatur propter stomachum et frequentes suas infirmitates.

### English translation (Claude)

Before that consolation comes, then, however great the prosperity of temporal goods that surrounds you, remember that you are desolate, so that you may persevere in prayers night and day. For the apostle does not assign this task to any widow whatever, but "she who is truly a widow," he says, "and desolate, has set her hope on the Lord and perseveres in prayers night and day." But beware most watchfully of what follows: "She who lives in pleasures is dead while she lives." For a person lives in the things he loves, which he seeks as something great, in which he believes himself to be happy. Therefore what Scripture said of riches, "If riches abound, do not set your heart on them," I also say to you of pleasures: if pleasures abound, do not set your heart on them. Do not think highly of yourself because they are not lacking, because they are plentifully at hand, because they flow as from a most abundant fountain of earthly happiness. Utterly despise and scorn these things in yourself, so that you seek nothing in them except sound bodily health. This is not to be despised, because of the necessary uses of this life, before this mortal body is clothed with immortality, that is, with true, perfect, and everlasting health, which does not fail through earthly weakness and need to be restored by corruptible pleasure, but persists in heavenly strength and is quickened with eternal incorruptibility. For the apostle himself says: "Make no provision for the flesh in its desires," because we do take care of the flesh, but for the needs of health; "for no one ever hated his own flesh," as he likewise says. Hence he also admonishes Timothy, who was evidently too severe a chastiser of his body, to use a little wine for his stomach and his frequent ailments.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 62:10 (61:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:14: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 5:5–6; Ps 62:10 (61:11 LXX); 1 Cor 15:53–54; Rom 13:14; Eph 5:29; 1 Tim 5:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.7 (CSEL 44:47–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-7).

## Letter 130.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-8
- Source: CSEL 44:49–50
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many saints gave their riches to the poor; Proba must at least not set her heart on her wealth, and the judgment of her conduct belongs to God.

### Latin text

Has ergo delicias, in quibus uidua si agit, hoc est si delectatione cordis haeret atque habitat, uiuens mortua est, multi sancti et sanctae omni modo cauentes ipsas uelut matres deliciarum diuitias dispergendo pauperibus abiecerunt et alio modo in caelestibus thesauris potius condiderunt. quod si tu deuincta aliquo pietatis officio non facis, tu scis, quam de his rationem reddas deo. nemo enim scit, quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est. nos non debemus ante tempus quicquam iudicare, donec ueniat dominus et inluminet abscondita tenebrarum et manifestabit cogitationes cordis; et tunc laus erit unicuique a deo. pertinet tamen ad uidualem curam tuam, deliciae si adfluant, ne adponas cor, ne in eis putrescendo moriatur, quod sursum esse debet, ut uiuat. te in eo numero deputato, de quibus scriptum est: Viuent corda eorum in saeculum saeculi.

### English translation (Claude)

These pleasures, then, in which a widow, if she lives in them (that is, if she clings to them and dwells in them with the delight of her heart), is dead while she lives, many holy men and women have guarded against in every way, and have cast away riches, as the mothers of pleasures, by distributing them to the poor, and so in another way have rather stored them up in heavenly treasuries. If you do not do this, being bound by some duty of family affection, you know what account you will give of them to God. For no one knows what goes on in a person except the spirit of the person which is in him. We ought not to judge anything before the time, until the Lord comes and brings to light the hidden things of darkness and will make manifest the thoughts of the heart; and then each one will have praise from God. Yet it belongs to your care as a widow that, if pleasures abound, you do not set your heart on them, lest what ought to be on high in order to live should die by rotting in them. Count yourself among those of whom it is written: "Their hearts shall live for ever and ever."

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:20: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 62:10 (61:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 6:20 (allusion); 1 Cor 2:11; 1 Cor 4:5; Ps 62:10 (61:11 LXX); Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX). The printed "deputato" is translated by sense as an imperative ("count yourself").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.8 (CSEL 44:49–50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-8).

## Letter 130.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-9
- Source: CSEL 44:50
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: What one should pray for is, in brief, the happy life, which all desire but only the good attain.

### Latin text

Audisti, qualiter ores, audi et, quid ores, unde me maxime consulendum putasti, quoniam te permouet, quod ait apostolus: Quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus, et timuisti, ne magis tibi obsit non, sicut oportet, orare quam non orare. quod sic itaque dici breuiter potest: Ora beatam uitam; hanc enim habere omnes homines uolunt; nam et qui pessime et perdite uiuunt, nullo modo ita uiuerent, nisi eo modo se uel esse beatos putarent. quid igitur aliud oportet orare, nisi id, quod cupiunt et mali et boni, sed ad quod perueniunt nonnisi boni?

### English translation (Claude)

You have heard how you should pray; hear also what you should pray for, which is the main point on which you thought I should be consulted, since you are troubled by what the apostle says: "For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought," and you feared that it might harm you more to pray not as you ought than not to pray at all. This can be put briefly thus: pray for the happy life. For all human beings want to have this; even those who live most wickedly and abandonedly would never live in that way unless they thought that by it they were, or would be, happy. What else, then, ought we to pray for but what both the bad and the good desire, but which only the good attain?

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.9 (CSEL 44:50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-9).

## Letter 130.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-10
- Source: CSEL 44:50–52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The happy life is not living as one wishes, as even Cicero saw, since to wish what is unfitting is the worst misery.

### Latin text

Hic fortasse iam quaeras, quid sit ipsa beata uita. in qua quaestione multa philosophorum ingenia otiaque contrita sunt, qui tamen eam tanto minus inuenire potuerunt, quanto minus eius fontem honorauerunt eique gratias egerunt. prius itaque adtende, utrum adquiescendum sit eis, qui dicunt eum beatum esse, qui secundum suam uiuit uoluntatem. sed absit, ut hoc uerum esse credamus. quid, si enim nequiter uelit uiuere? nonne tanto miserior esse conuincitur, quanto facilius mala uoluntas eius impletur? merito hanc sententiam etiam ipsi, qui sine dei cultu philosophati sunt, respuerunt. nam quidam eorum uir eloquentissimus ait: Ecce autem alii non philosophi quidem sed prompti tamen ad disputandum omnes aiunt esse beatos, qui uiuunt, ut ipsi uelint. falsum id quidem; uelle enim, quod non deceat, id est ipsum miserrimum nec tam miserum est non adipisci, quod uelis, quam adipisci uelle, quod non oporteat. quid tibi uidentur haec uerba? nonne ab ipsa ueritate per quemlibet hominem dicta sunt? possumus ergo hic dicere, quod apostolus ait de quodam propheta Cretensi, cum eius illi sententia placuisset: Testimonium hoc uerum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Here perhaps you may now ask what the happy life itself is. On this question many philosophers have worn out their talents and their leisure, and yet they were less able to find it the less they honored its source and gave thanks to him. First, then, consider whether we should agree with those who say that he is happy who lives according to his own will. Far be it from us to believe this true. For what if he wishes to live wickedly? Is he not shown to be the more miserable the more easily his bad will is fulfilled? Rightly even those who philosophized without the worship of God rejected this opinion. For one of them, a most eloquent man, says: "But see, others, not philosophers indeed, but ready to argue, say that all are happy who live as they themselves wish. That is false; for to wish what is not fitting is itself the most miserable thing, and it is not so miserable not to obtain what you wish as to wish to obtain what you ought not." What do you think of these words? Were they not spoken by the truth itself, through whatever human being? We can therefore say here what the apostle said of a certain Cretan prophet, when a saying of his had pleased him: "This testimony is true."

### Scripture references

- Titus 1:13: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Hortensius (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The "most eloquent man" is Cicero, from the lost Hortensius (fragment preserved here and in Augustine's other works). Titus 1:12–13 (the Cretan prophet is traditionally Epimenides).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.10 (CSEL 44:50–52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-10).

## Letter 130.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-11
- Source: CSEL 44:52–53
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Marriage, continence, children and health may all be fittingly desired, but having them does not yet make one happy.

### Latin text

Ille igitur beatus est, qui omnia, quae uult, habet nec aliquid uult, quod non decet. quod si ita est, uide iam, quae homines non indecenter uelint. alius uult coniugari, alius coniugio uiduatus deinceps continenter eligit uiuere, alius nullum concubitum nec in ipsis nuptiis experiri. et si aliud hic alio melius reperitur, nullum tamen istorum possumus dicere indecenter aliquid uelle; sic et optare filios nuptiarum scilicet fructum et eis, qui suscepti fuerint, uitam ac salutem, quo uoto plerumque occupatur etiam continentia uidualis; nam etsi spreto coniugio iam non optant etiam filios procreare, optant tamen, quos procreauerunt, incolumes uiuere. ab hac omni cura immunis est uirginalis integritas; habent tamen omnes caros et caras, quibus non indecenter optent etiam temporalem salutem. sed cum istam salutem in se ipsis et in eis, quos diligunt, adepti homines fuerint, num poterimus eos dicere iam beatos? habent enim aliquid, quod non dedecet uelle; sed si alia non habent maiora atque meliora et utilitatis decorisque pleniora, adhuc a beata uita longe absunt.

### English translation (Claude)

He, then, is happy who has all that he wishes and wishes nothing that is not fitting. If this is so, see now what people may fittingly wish. One wishes to marry; another, widowed of a spouse, chooses thereafter to live in continence; another chooses never to experience sexual union even in marriage. And although one of these is found better than another, we cannot say that any of them wishes anything unfitting. So also to desire children, which are the fruit of marriage, and life and health for those who have been born, a wish which often occupies even the continence of widows; for though, having renounced marriage, they no longer wish to beget children, they do wish those they have begotten to live in safety. From all this care virginal integrity is free; yet all have dear ones, men and women, for whom they may fittingly wish even temporal health. But when people have obtained this health for themselves and for those they love, shall we be able to say that they are now happy? They do have something that it is not unfitting to wish for; but if they do not have other things, greater and better and fuller of usefulness and honor, they are still far from the happy life.

### Translation notes

- The three states (marriage, widowed continence, virginity) are ranked as in Augustine's treatises on marriage and virginity; none is called unfitting.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.11 (CSEL 44:52–53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-11).

## Letter 130.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-12
- Source: CSEL 44:53–54
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Honors and a sufficiency of goods may be fittingly sought, not for themselves but for the good of others and of bodily health.

### Latin text

Placetne igitur, ut super salutem istam temporalem optent sibi ac suis honores et potestates? sane, si, ut per haec consulant eis, qui uiuunt sub eis, non propter haec ipsa sed propter aliud, quod inde fit bonum, decet ea uelle; si autem propter inanem fastum elationis pompamque superfluam uel etiam noxiam uanitatis, non decet. quocirca si optant sibi ac suis etiam sufficientiam rerum necessariarum, de qua sic apostolus loquitur: Est autem quaestus magnus pietas cum sufficientia; nihil enim intulimus in hunc mundum sed nec auferre hinc aliquid possumus; uictum et tegumentum habentes his contenti sumus. nam qui uolunt diuites fieri, incidunt in temptationem et laqueum et desideria multa stulta et noxia, quae mergunt homines in interitum et perditionem; radix enim omnium malorum auaritia, quam quidam appetentes a fide errauerunt et inseruerunt se doloribus multis, - hanc ergo sufficientiam non indecenter uult, quisquis uult nec amplius uult; alioquin non ipsam uult et ideo nec decenter uult. hanc optabat et pro hac orabat, qui dicebat: Diuitias et paupertatem ne dederis mihi; constitue autem mihi, quae necessaria sunt, sufficienter, ut ne satiatus mendax efficiar et dicam: Quis me uidet? aut pauper factus furer et iurem nomen dei mei. uides certe et istam sufficientiam non appeti propter se ipsam sed propter salutem corporis et congruentem habitum personae hominis, quo habitu non sit inconueniens eis, cum quibus honeste officioseque uiuendum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Is it right, then, that beyond this temporal health they should wish for honors and powers for themselves and their own? Certainly it is fitting to wish for them if it is in order to care through them for those who live under them, not for their own sake but for the sake of some other good that comes from them; but if it is for the empty display of pride and for superfluous or even harmful pomp of vanity, it is not fitting. Accordingly, if they wish for themselves and their own a sufficiency of necessary things, of which the apostle speaks thus: "Godliness with sufficiency is great gain; for we brought nothing into this world, nor can we take anything away from it; having food and clothing, with these we are content. For those who want to become rich fall into temptation and a snare and many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge people into ruin and destruction; for the root of all evils is avarice, by craving which some have strayed from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows": whoever wishes for this sufficiency and wishes no more wishes not unfittingly; otherwise he does not wish for it, and so does not wish fittingly. He wished for this and prayed for it who said: "Give me neither riches nor poverty, but appoint for me sufficiently what is necessary, lest being filled I become a liar and say, 'Who sees me?', or being made poor I steal and swear by the name of my God." You see, surely, that this sufficiency too is sought not for its own sake but for the health of the body and for a manner of life befitting the person's station, such that it is not unsuitable for those with whom one must live honorably and dutifully.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:10: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 30:8: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 30:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 6:6–10; Prov 30:8–9, in the Old Latin wording.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.12 (CSEL 44:53–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-12).

## Letter 130.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-13
- Source: CSEL 44:54–55
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Well-being and friendship are sought for their own sake, and friendship extends to all people, even enemies; we should pray to keep or gain them.

### Latin text

In his itaque omnibus incolumitas hominis et amicitia propter se ipsa appetuntur, sufficientia uero rerum necessariarum non propter se ipsam sed propter duo superiora quaeri solet, cum decenter quaeritur. incolumitas porro in ipsa uita ac salute atque integritate animi et corporis constituta est. itemque amicitia non angustis finibus terminanda est; omnes enim, quibus amor et dilectio debetur, amplectitur, quamuis in alios propensius in alios suspensius inclinetur; peruenit autem usque ad inimicos, pro quibus etiam orare praecipimur. ita nemo est in genere humano, cui non dilectio etsi non pro mutua caritate pro ipsa tamen communis naturae societate debeatur. sed hi nos multum iusteque delectant, a quibus uicissim sancte casteque diligimur. ista cum habentur, ut teneantur, cum autem non habentur, ut habeantur, orandum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Among all these things, then, a person's well-being and friendship are sought for their own sake, while a sufficiency of necessary things is usually sought, when it is sought fittingly, not for its own sake but for the sake of the two former. Well-being, moreover, consists in life itself and in the health and soundness of mind and body. Likewise friendship is not to be confined within narrow bounds; for it embraces all to whom love and affection are owed, though it inclines more readily toward some and more hesitantly toward others; and it reaches even to enemies, for whom we are commanded also to pray. Thus there is no one in the human race to whom love is not owed, if not because of mutual affection, then at least because of the fellowship of our common nature. But those by whom we are loved in return, holily and chastely, delight us greatly and justly. When we have these things, we must pray that we may keep them; when we do not have them, that we may have them.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:44 (allusion).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.13 (CSEL 44:54–55; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-13).

## Letter 130.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-14
- Source: CSEL 44:55–56
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: All temporal goods must be referred to eternal life with God; we love God for himself and ourselves and our neighbors for his sake, but are not yet happy.

### Latin text

Hocine totum et haec sunt omnia, quibus beatae uitae summa colligitur? an aliquid aliud ueritas docet, quod his omnibus praeferatur? nam et illa sufficientia et ipsa incolumitas uel propria uel amicorum quam diu temporalis est, pro aeternae uitae adeptione abicienda est, quamquam fortasse corpus animus uero nullo modo sanus existimandus est, qui non temporalibus aeterna praeponit. neque enim utiliter in tempore uiuitur nisi ad comparandum meritum, quo in aeternitate uiuatur. ad illam ergo unam uitam, qua cum deo et de deo uiuitur, cetera, quae utiliter et decenter optantur, sine dubio referenda sunt. in eo quippe nosmet ipsos diligimus, si deum diligimus, et ex alio praecepto proximos nostros sicut nosmet ipsos ita uere diligimus, si eos ad dei similem dilectionem, quantum in nobis est, perducamus. deum igitur diligimus per se ipsum et nos ac proximos propter ipsum. nec cum ita uiuimus, iam nos in ipsa beata uita constitutos existimemus, quasi nihil sit amplius, quod oremus. quo modo enim iam beate uiuimus, cum illud adhuc desit, propter quod unum bene uiuimus?

### English translation (Claude)

Is this the whole, and are these all the things in which the sum of the happy life is gathered? Or does the truth teach something else, to be preferred to all these? For both that sufficiency and well-being itself, whether one's own or one's friends', so long as it is temporal, must be cast aside for the attainment of eternal life; for though the body may perhaps be thought healthy, the mind is by no means to be thought sound that does not prefer eternal things to temporal. For one does not live profitably in time except to acquire the merit by which one may live in eternity. To that one life, then, in which one lives with God and from God, all other things that are profitably and fittingly desired must without doubt be referred. For we love ourselves in this, if we love God; and by the other commandment we truly love our neighbors as ourselves if, so far as is in us, we lead them to a like love of God. We love God, therefore, for his own sake, and ourselves and our neighbors for his sake. Nor, when we live thus, should we suppose that we are already established in the happy life itself, as if there were nothing more to pray for. For how do we already live happily when that is still lacking for the sake of which alone we live well?

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 22:39: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 22:37–39 (allusion).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.14 (CSEL 44:55–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-14).

## Letter 130.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-15
- Source: CSEL 44:56–58
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The one thing to ask is to dwell in God's house; Christ forbade much speaking yet urged persistent prayer by the parables of the unjust judge and the friend at midnight.

### Latin text

Ut quid ergo per multa dispergimur et quaerimus, quid oremus, timentes, ne forte, sicut non oportet, oremus, ac non potius cum psalmo dicimus: Unam petii a domino, hanc requiram, ut inhabitem in domo domini omnes dies uitae meae, ut contempler delectationem domini et uisitem templum sanctum eius? ibi namque omnes dies non ueniendo et transeundo fiunt omnes nec initium alterius est finis alterius; omnes sine fine simul sunt, ubi nec ipsa uita habet finem, cuius illi dies sunt. propter hanc adipiscendam beatam uitam ipsa uera uita orare nos docuit non in multiloquio, tamquam eo fiat, ut exaudiamur, quo loquaciores sumus, cum eum oremus, qui nouit, sicut ipse dominus ait, quid nobis necessarium sit, priusquam petamus ab eo. unde mirum uideri potest, quamuis multiloquium prohibuerit, cur nos orare sic adhortatus sit, qui nouit, quid nobis necessarium sit, priusquam petamus ab eo, ut diceret: Oportet semper orare et non deficere uiduae cuiusdam proposito exemplo, quae de suo aduersario cupiens uindicari iudicem iniquum saepe interpellando flexit ad audiendum non iustitia uel misericordia permotum sed taedio superatum, ut hinc admoneremur, quam certius nos exaudiat misericors et iustus dominus deus sine intermissione orantes, quando illa nec ab iniquo et impio iudice potuit assidua interpellatione contemni, et quam libens atque placatus bona desideria impleat eorum, a quibus aliena peccata nouit ignosci, si, quo cupiebat, illa peruenit, quae uoluit uindicari. ille quoque, cui amicus de uia uenerat nec, quod ei adponeret, habebat, ab amico sibi cupiens commodari tres panes, quibus fortasse ipsa trinitas unius substantiae figurata est, iam cum suis seruis dormientem petitor instantissimus et molestissimus excitauit, ut daret ei, quantos uolebat, magis et ipse uitando taedium quam beniuolentiam cogitando, ut hinc intellegeremus, si dare cogitur, qui, cum dormiat, a petente excitatur inuitus, quanto det benignius, qui nec dormire nouit et dormientes nos excitat, ut petamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Why then are we scattered over many things and ask what we should pray for, fearing that we may pray as we ought not, and do not rather say with the psalm: "One thing I have asked of the Lord, this I will seek: that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, that I may contemplate the delight of the Lord and visit his holy temple"? For there all the days are all, not by coming and passing away, nor is the beginning of one the end of another; all are together without end, where the life itself, whose days they are, has no end. For the sake of attaining this happy life, the true Life himself taught us to pray, not with much speaking, as if we were heard the more the more talkative we are, since we pray to him who, as the Lord himself says, knows what we need before we ask him. Hence it may seem strange, although he forbade much speaking, why he who knows what we need before we ask him urged us to pray in such a way that he said, "One ought always to pray and not lose heart," setting forth the example of a certain widow who, wishing to be avenged on her adversary, by frequently pressing an unjust judge bent him to hear her, moved not by justice or mercy but overcome by weariness. Thus we were to be admonished how much more surely the merciful and just Lord God hears us when we pray without ceasing, since she could not be disregarded, for her constant pressing, even by an unjust and ungodly judge; and how willingly and graciously he fulfils the good desires of those who he knows forgive the sins of others, if she who wished to be avenged achieved what she wanted. So too the man to whom a friend had come from a journey and who had nothing to set before him, wishing to borrow three loaves from a friend (by which perhaps the Trinity itself, of one substance, was figured), by asking most urgently and most annoyingly roused that friend, who was already asleep with his servants, to give him as many as he wanted, the friend himself acting more to avoid annoyance than out of goodwill. Thus we were to understand that, if one who is asleep and roused against his will by a petitioner is compelled to give, how much more kindly will he give who does not know how to sleep, and who rouses us when we sleep, so that we may ask.

### Scripture references

- Ps 27:4 (26:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:8: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:1: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:2: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 11:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 27:4 (26:4 LXX); Matt 6:7–8; Luke 18:1–8; Luke 11:5–8. The three loaves as a figure of the Trinity is offered tentatively ("perhaps").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.15 (CSEL 44:56–58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-15).

## Letter 130.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-16
- Source: CSEL 44:58–59
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's sayings on asking, seeking, and knocking are interpreted allegorically: fish, egg, and bread signify faith, hope, and love.

### Latin text

Hinc est et illud: Petite et accipietis, quaerite et inuenietis, pulsate et aperietur uobis; omnis enim, qui petit, accipit et quaerens inuenit et pulsanti aperietur. aut quis est ex uobis homo, a quo filius suus panem petit, numquid lapidem porriget ei? aut si piscem petit, numquid serpentem porriget ei? aut si ouum petit, numquid porriget ei scorpium? si ergo uos, cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis uestris, quanto magis pater uester caelestis dabit bona petentibus se. cum ergo secundum tria illa, quae commendat apostolus, fides significetur in pisce uel propter aquam baptismi uel quod in huius saeculi fluctibus integra est, cui contrarius est ille serpens, qui, ut non crederetur deo, uenenosa fraude persuasit, spes in ouo, quia uita pulli nondum est, sed futura est nec iam uidetur, sed adhuc speratur — spes enim, quae uidetur, non est spes —, cui contrarius est scorpius, quoniam, qui sperat aeternam uitam. quae retro sunt, obliuiscitur et in anteriora se extendit, cui noxium est retro respicere, scorpius autem ex ea parte cauendus est, quam uenenatam et aculeatam retrorsum habet, caritas in pane, maior enim horum caritas et in cibis utique uincit cetera panis utilitas, cui contrarius est lapis. quoniam dura corda respuunt caritatem, siue aliud aliquid congruentius ista significent, tamen, qui nouit bona data dare filiis suis, petere nos et quaerere et pulsare compellit.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence also that saying: "Ask and you will receive, seek and you will find, knock and it will be opened to you; for everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. Or what man is there among you who, if his son asks him for bread, will hand him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will he hand him a serpent? Or if he asks for an egg, will he hand him a scorpion? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give good things to those who ask him." Now, according to those three things which the apostle commends: faith is signified in the fish, either because of the water of baptism or because it remains unharmed amid the waves of this world, and its opposite is that serpent who by poisonous deceit persuaded us not to believe God; hope in the egg, because the chick's life is not yet but is to come, and is not yet seen but still hoped for (for hope that is seen is not hope), and its opposite is the scorpion, because he who hopes for eternal life forgets what lies behind and stretches forward to what lies ahead, and for him it is harmful to look back, while the scorpion must be guarded against on the side where it has its poisonous sting, at its back; love in the bread, for the greatest of these is love, and among foods the usefulness of bread surpasses the rest, and its opposite is the stone, because hard hearts reject love. Whether these things signify this or something else more fitting, he who knows how to give good gifts to his children urges us to ask and seek and knock.

### Scripture references

- Luke 11:9: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 11:10: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 11:11: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 11:12: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 11:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:13: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 3:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 11:9–13 (cf. Matt 7:7–11); 1 Cor 13:13; Rom 8:24; Phil 3:13. The fish as a sign of faith, egg of hope, and bread of love is Augustine's allegory, offered with "whether ... or something else more fitting".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.16 (CSEL 44:58–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-16).

## Letter 130.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-17
- Source: CSEL 44:59–60
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God, who knows our needs, has us pray so that our desire may be exercised and enlarged to receive the great gift he prepares.

### Latin text

Quod quare faciat, qui nouit, quid nobis necessarium sit, priusquam petamus ab eo, mouere animum potest, nisi intellegamus, quod dominus et deus noster non uoluntatem nostram sibi uelit innotescere, quam non potest ignorare, sed exerceri in orationibus desiderium nostrum, quo possimus capere, quod praeparat dare. illud enim ualde magnum est, sed nos ad accipiendum parui et angusti sumus. ideo nobis dicitur: Dilatamini, ne sitis iugum ducentes cum infidelibus. tanto quippe illud, quod ualde magnum est, quod nec oculus uidit, quia non est color, nec auris audiuit, quia non est sonus, nec in cor hominis ascendit, quia cor hominis illuc debet ascendere, sumemus capacius, quanto id et fidelius credimus et speramus firmius et desideramus ardentius.

### English translation (Claude)

Why he should do this who knows what we need before we ask him might trouble the mind, unless we understand that our Lord and God does not wish our will to become known to him, for he cannot be ignorant of it, but wishes our desire to be exercised in prayers, so that we may be able to receive what he is preparing to give. For that is very great, but we are small and narrow for receiving it. Therefore it is said to us: "Be enlarged; do not be yoked with unbelievers." For we shall receive that which is very great, which eye has not seen, because it is not a color, nor ear heard, because it is not a sound, nor has it gone up into the heart of man, because the heart of man must go up into it, with greater capacity the more faithfully we believe it, the more firmly we hope for it, and the more ardently we desire it.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 6:13–14; 1 Cor 2:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.17 (CSEL 44:59–60; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-17).

## Letter 130.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-18
- Source: CSEL 44:60–61
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We pray always by desire, but pray in words at set times to rekindle that desire; our requests are made known to ourselves, or to the angels, not to God, who knows them already.

### Latin text

In ipsa ergo fide et spe et caritate continuato desiderio semper oramus. sed ideo per certa interualla horarum et temporum etiam uerbis rogamus deum, ut illis rerum signis nos ipsos admoneamus, quantumque in hoc desiderio profecerimus, nobis ipsis innotescamus et ad hoc augendum nos ipsos acrius excitemus. dignior enim sequitur effectus, quem feruentior praecedit affectus. ac per hoc et quod ait apostolus: Sine intermissione orate, quid est aliud quam beatam uitam, quae nulla nisi aeterna est, ab illo, qui eam dare solus potest, sine intermissione desiderate? semper ergo hanc a domino deo desideremus et semper oremus. sed ideo ab aliis curis atque negotiis, quibus ipsum desiderium quodam modo tepescit, certis horis ad negotium orandi mentem reuocamus uerbis orationis nos admonentes in id, quod desideramus, intendere, ne, quod tepescere coeperat, omnino frigescat et penitus extinguatur, nisi crebrius inflammetur. unde et illud, quod idem apostolus ait: Postulationes uestrae innotescant apud deum, non sic accipiendum est, tamquam deo innotescant, qui eas, et antequam essent, utique nouerat, sed nobis innotescant apud deum per tolerantiam, non apud homines per iactantiam, aut forte innotescant etiam angelis, qui sunt apud deum, ut quodam modo eas offerant deo et de his consulant et, quod eo iubente implendum esse cognouerint, sicut oportere ibi cognouerint, hoc nobis uel euidenter uel latenter adportent; dixit enim angelus homini: Et nunc, quando orabas tu et Sarra, ego obtuli memoriam orationis uestrae in conspectu claritatis dei.

### English translation (Claude)

In faith itself, then, and hope and love, we pray always with continual desire. But at fixed intervals of hours and times we also ask God in words, so that by these signs of things we may remind ourselves, may make known to ourselves how far we have advanced in this desire, and may rouse ourselves more keenly to increase it. For the more worthy effect follows when a more fervent affection precedes. And so what the apostle says, "Pray without ceasing," what else does it mean than: desire without ceasing the happy life, which is none other than eternal life, from him who alone can give it? Let us therefore always desire it from the Lord God, and so always pray. But at certain hours we call the mind back from other cares and business, by which the desire itself somehow grows lukewarm, to the business of praying, reminding ourselves by the words of prayer to attend to what we desire, lest what had begun to grow lukewarm should become altogether cold and be wholly extinguished, unless it is more frequently kindled. Hence also what the same apostle says, "Let your requests be made known before God," is not to be taken as if they were made known to God, who certainly knew them even before they existed, but that they are made known to us before God by patient endurance, not before men by boasting; or perhaps that they are made known also to the angels who are before God, so that in some way they may offer them to God and consult about them, and may bring to us, either openly or secretly, what they have learned at his command is to be fulfilled, as they have learned there that it should be. For the angel said to the man: "And now, when you and Sarah were praying, I offered the remembrance of your prayer in the sight of the glory of God."

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 4:6: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 12:12 (Tobit): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:17; Phil 4:6. The angel's words are from Tobit 12:12 (Raphael to Tobit; "Sarah" is Tobias's wife), quoted in the Old Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.18 (CSEL 44:60–61; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-18).

## Letter 130.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-19
- Source: CSEL 44:61–62
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Long prayer is not the forbidden 'much speaking', for Christ himself prayed all night and at length.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, etiam diu orare, cum uacat, id est cum alia bonarum et necessariarum actionum non impediuntur officia, quamuis et in eis, ut dixi, desiderio illo semper orandum sit, non est inprobum nec inutile. neque enim, ut nonnulli putant, hoc est orare in multiloquio, si diutius oretur. aliud est sermo multus aliud diuturnus affectus. nam et de ipso domino scriptum est, quod pernoctauerit in orando et quod prolixius orauerit. ubi quid aliud quam nobis praebebat exemplum in tempore precator opportunus, cum patre exauditor aeternus?

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, to pray even at length when there is leisure, that is, when other duties of good and necessary actions are not hindered (though even in these, as I said, we must always pray with that desire), is neither wrong nor useless. For it is not, as some think, praying with much speaking if one prays for a long time. Many words are one thing, prolonged affection another. For it is written of the Lord himself that he spent the night in praying and that he prayed more at length. In this what else was he doing but giving us an example, he who is in time a fitting petitioner and, with the Father, the eternal hearer of prayer?

### Scripture references

- Luke 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 22:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 6:12; Luke 22:44 ("prayed more earnestly/at length", in the Old Latin "prolixius").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.19 (CSEL 44:61–62; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-19).

## Letter 130.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-20
- Source: CSEL 44:62–63
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Egyptian monks' short, frequent prayers show that attention matters; prayer is a matter more of groans and tears than of many words.

### Latin text

Dicuntur fratres in Aegypto crebras quidem habere orationes sed eas tamen breuissimas et raptim quodam modo iaculatas, ne illa uigilanter erecta, quae oranti plurimum necessaria est, per productiores moras euanescat atque hebetetur intentio. ac per hoc etiam ipsi satis ostendunt hanc intentionem, sicut non est obtundenda, si perdurare non potest, ita, si perdurauerit, non cito esse rumpendam. absit enim ab oratione multa locutio, sed non desit multa precatio, si feruens perseuerat intentio. nam multum loqui est in orando rem necessariam superfluis agere uerbis; multum autem precari est ad eum, quem precamur, diuturna et pia cordis excitatione pulsare. nam plerumque hoc negotium plus gemitibus quam sermonibus agitur, plus fletu quam affatu. ponit autem lacrimas nostras in conspectu suo et gemitus noster non est absconditus ab eo, qui omnia per uerbum condidit et humana uerba non quaerit.

### English translation (Claude)

The brothers in Egypt are said to have frequent prayers, but very short ones, and as it were darted out swiftly, so that the alertly raised attention, which is most necessary for one who prays, may not fade and grow dull through longer delays. And by this they themselves show clearly enough that this attention, just as it should not be blunted if it cannot last, so, if it does last, should not be quickly broken off. Far be much speaking from prayer, but let not much praying be lacking, if fervent attention persists. For to speak much in praying is to do a necessary thing with superfluous words; but to pray much is to knock at the door of him to whom we pray with a long and devout stirring of the heart. For this business is mostly done more with groans than with speeches, more with weeping than with words. He sets our tears in his sight, and our groaning is not hidden from him who made all things by the Word and does not need human words.

### Scripture references

- Ps 56:8 (55:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 38:9 (37:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- John 1:3: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The monks of Egypt are known for short ejaculatory prayers. Ps 56:8 (55:9 LXX); Ps 38:9 (37:10 LXX); John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.20 (CSEL 44:62–63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-20).

## Letter 130.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-21
- Source: CSEL 44:63–64
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains each petition of the Lord's Prayer as a reminder to ourselves of what we should desire, the bread meaning either sufficiency or the sacrament.

### Latin text

Nobis ergo uerba necessaria sunt, quibus commoneamur et inspiciamus, quid petamus, non quibus dominum seu docendum seu flectendum esse credamus. cum ergo dicimus: Sanctificetur nomen tuum, nos admonemus desiderare, ut nomen eius, quod semper sanctum est, etiam apud homines sanctum habeatur, hoc est non contemnatur, quod non deo sed hominibus prodest. et in eo, quod dicimus: Adueniat regnum tuum, quod, seu uelimus seu nolimus, utique ueniet, desiderium nostrum ad illud regnum excitamus, ut nobis ueniat atque in eo regnare mereamur. cum dicimus: Fiat uoluntas tua sicut in caelo et in terra, nobis ab illo precamur ipsam oboedientiam, ut sic in nobis fiat uoluntas eius, quem ad modum fit in caelestibus ab angelis eius. cum dicimus: Panem nostrum cotidianum da nobis hodie, per id, quod dicitur hodie, significatur hoc tempore, ubi uel sufficientiam illam petimus a parte, quae excellit, id est nomine panis totam significantes uel sacramentum fidelium, quod in hoc tempore necessarium est non tamen ad huius temporis sed ad illam aeternam felicitatem adsequendam. cum dicimus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris, nos admonemus, et quid petamus et quid faciamus, ut accipere mereamur. cum dicimus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, nos admonemus hoc petere, ne deserti eius adiutorio alicui temptationi uel consentiamus decepti uel cedamus afflicti. cum dicimus: Libera nos a malo, nos admonemus cogitare nondum nos esse in eo bono, ubi nullum patiemur malum. et hoc quidem ultimum quod in oratione dominica positum est, tam late patet, ut homo Christianus in qualibet tribulatione constitutus in hoc gemitus edat, in hoc lacrimas fundat. hinc exordiatur, in hoc inmoretur, ad hoc terminet orationem. his enim uerbis res ipsas memoriae nostrae commendari oportebat.

### English translation (Claude)

We need words, then, by which we may be reminded and may consider what we ask, not words by which we believe the Lord is to be either taught or persuaded. When we say, "Hallowed be your name," we remind ourselves to desire that his name, which is always holy, may also be held holy among men, that is, not be despised; and this benefits not God but men. And when we say, "Your kingdom come," which will certainly come whether we wish it or not, we rouse our desire for that kingdom, that it may come for us and that we may be found worthy to reign in it. When we say, "Your will be done, as in heaven, so also on earth," we pray him for obedience itself, that his will may be done in us as it is done in heaven by his angels. When we say, "Give us this day our daily bread," the word "this day" signifies "in this time," in which we ask either for that sufficiency, naming the whole by its chief part, that is, signifying everything by the word "bread", or for the sacrament of the faithful, which is necessary in this time, yet for attaining not the happiness of this time but that eternal happiness. When we say, "Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors," we remind ourselves both what we ask and what we must do in order to be worthy to receive it. When we say, "Lead us not into temptation," we remind ourselves to ask that we may not, deserted by his help, either consent to any temptation when deceived or yield to it when afflicted. When we say, "Deliver us from evil," we remind ourselves to reflect that we are not yet in that good where we shall suffer no evil. And this last petition of the Lord's Prayer extends so widely that a Christian in any tribulation whatever may utter his groans in it and pour out his tears in it, begin his prayer with it, dwell on it, and end with it. For it was fitting that by these words the realities themselves should be committed to our memory.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:11: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 6:9–13. "The sacrament of the faithful" is the Eucharist, offered as one of two readings of "daily bread".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.21 (CSEL 44:63–64; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-21).

## Letter 130.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-22
- Source: CSEL 44:64–66
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: All rightful prayers, including those of Scripture, say in other words what the Lord's Prayer contains; to ask for what it cannot include is to pray carnally.

### Latin text

Nam quaelibet alia uerba dicamus, quae affectus orantis uel praecedendo format, ut clareat, uel consequendo adtendit, ut crescat, nihil aliud dicimus, quam quod in ista dominica oratione positum est, si recte et congruenter oramus. quisquis autem id dicit, quod ad istam euangelicam precem pertinere non possit, etiamsi non inlicite orat, carnaliter orat, quod nescio quem ad modum non dicatur inlicite, quando quidem spiritu renatos non nisi spiritaliter deceat orare. qui enim dicit uerbi gratia: Clarificare in omnibus gentibus, sicut clarificatus es in nobis, et: Prophetae tui fideles inueniantur, quid aliud dicit quam: Sanctificetur nomen tuum? qui dicit: Deus uirtutum, conuerte nos et ostende faciem tuam et salui erimus, quid aliud dicit quam: Veniat regnum tuum? qui dicit: Itinera mea dirige secundum uerbum tuum et ne dominetur mihi omnis iniquitas, quid aliud dicit quam: Fiat uoluntas tua sicut in caelo et in terra? qui dicit: Paupertatem et diuitias ne dederis mihi, quid aliud dicit quam: Panem nostrum cotidianum da nobis hodie? qui dicit: Memento, domine, Dauid et omnis mansuetudinis eius, aut: Domine, si feci istud, si est iniquitas in manibus meis, si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala, quid aliud dicit quam: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris? qui dicit: Aufer a me concupiscentias uentris et desiderium concubitus ne adprehendat me, quid aliud dicit quam: Ne nos inferas in temptationem? qui dicit: Erue me ab inimicis meis, deus, et ab insurgentibus super me libera me, quid aliud dicit quam: Libera nos a malo? et si per omnia precationum sanctarum uerba discurras, quantum existimo, nihil inuenies, quod non ista dominica contineat et concludat oratio. unde liberum est aliis atque aliis uerbis eadem tamen in orando dicere, sed non esse debet liberum alia dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

For whatever other words we may say, words which the affection of the one praying either forms beforehand so that it may be clear, or attends to afterward so that it may grow, we say nothing else than what is contained in this Lord's Prayer, if we pray rightly and fittingly. But whoever says something that cannot belong to this Gospel prayer, even if he does not pray unlawfully, prays carnally; and I do not know how this can be said not to be unlawful, since it befits those reborn of the Spirit to pray only spiritually. For one who says, for example, "Be glorified among all nations, as you have been glorified among us," and "Let your prophets be found faithful," what else does he say than "Hallowed be your name"? One who says, "God of hosts, turn us and show your face, and we shall be saved," what else does he say than "Your kingdom come"? One who says, "Direct my steps according to your word, and let no iniquity rule over me," what else does he say than "Your will be done, as in heaven, so also on earth"? One who says, "Give me neither poverty nor riches," what else does he say than "Give us this day our daily bread"? One who says, "Remember, Lord, David and all his meekness," or "Lord, if I have done this, if there is iniquity in my hands, if I have repaid evil to those who repaid me," what else does he say than "Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors"? One who says, "Take away from me the desires of the belly, and let not the desire of sexual union lay hold of me," what else does he say than "Lead us not into temptation"? One who says, "Rescue me from my enemies, O God, and deliver me from those who rise up against me," what else does he say than "Deliver us from evil"? And if you run through all the words of holy prayers, you will find, I think, nothing that this Lord's Prayer does not contain and include. Hence one is free to say the same things in praying in other and other words, but one ought not to be free to say other things.

### Scripture references

- Ps 80:7 (79:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:133 (118:133 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 30:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 132:1 (131:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 7:3 (7:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 7:4 (7:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 59:1 (58:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:9: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 36:4 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Sir 36:21 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Sir 23:6 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sir 36:4 and 36:21 (36:3, 36:18 in some numberings; Old Latin); Ps 80:7 (79:8 LXX); Ps 119:133 (118:133 LXX); Prov 30:8; Ps 132:1 (131:1 LXX); Ps 7:3–4 (7:4–5 LXX); Sir 23:6; Ps 59:1 (58:2 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.22 (CSEL 44:64–66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-22).

## Letter 130.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-23
- Source: CSEL 44:66–67
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We should pray these petitions for all, even enemies; prayers for wealth and honor out of greed have no place in the Lord's Prayer.

### Latin text

Haec et pro nobis et pro nostris et pro alienis atque ipsis inimicis sine fluctu dubitationis oranda sunt, quamuis alius pro isto alius pro illo, sicut se habent propinquitates uel longinquitates necessitudinum, in corde orantis oriatur aut extollat affectus. qui autem dicit in oratione uerbi gratia: Domine, multiplica diuitias meas, aut: Da mihi tantas, quantas illi uel illi dedisti, aut: Honores meos auge, fac me in hoc saeculo praepotentem atque clarentem, uel si quid eius modi est, et haec dicit eorum habens concupiscentiam non id adtendens, ut ex his secundum deum prosit hominibus, puto eum non inuenire in oratione dominica, quo possit haec uota coaptare. quam ob rem pudeat saltem petere, quae non pudet cupere, aut si et hoc pudet, sed cupiditas uincit, quanto melius hoc petitur, ut etiam ab isto cupiditatis malo liberet, cui dicimus: Libera nos a malo!

### English translation (Claude)

These things are to be prayed for, without wavering doubt, for ourselves, for our own, for strangers, and for our very enemies, although affection may arise or rise higher in the heart of the one praying for this person or for that, according to the nearness or distance of the relationship. But whoever says in prayer, for example, "Lord, multiply my riches," or "Give me as much as you gave to this man or that," or "Increase my honors, make me most powerful and renowned in this world," or anything of that kind, and says these things out of desire for them, not aiming that by them he may benefit people according to God, I think he will find nothing in the Lord's Prayer to which he can fit these wishes. Therefore let him at least be ashamed to ask for what he is not ashamed to desire; or if he is ashamed of this too, but greed prevails, how much better is it to ask that he may deliver him from this evil of greed also, he to whom we say, "Deliver us from evil"!

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 6:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.23 (CSEL 44:66–67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-23).

## Letter 130.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-24
- Source: CSEL 44:67–68
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The happy life is God himself; faith, hope, and love lead the one who prays to him, and fasting, self-restraint, and almsgiving help prayer.

### Latin text

Habes, quantum arbitror, non solum qualis ores, uerum etiam quid ores, non me docente sed illo, qui omnes nos docere dignatus est. beata uita quaerenda est, haec a domino deo petenda. quid sit beatum esse, a multis multa sunt disputata; sed nos ad multos et ad multa ut quid imus? breuiter in scriptura dei ueraciterque dictum est: Beatus populus, cuius est dominus deus ipsius. in ipso populo ut simus atque ad eum contemplandum et cum eo sine fine uiuendum peruenire possimus, finis praecepti est caritas de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta. in eisdem tribus pro conscientia bona spes posita est. fides ergo et spes et caritas ad deum perducunt orantem, hoc est credentem, sperantem, desiderantem et, quae petat a domino in dominica oratione, considerantem. ieiunia et ab aliis uoluptatibus sine salutis neglectu carnalis concupiscentiae refrenatio maximeque elemosynae multum adiuuant orationem, ut possimus dicere: In die tribulationis meae deum exquisiui manibus meis nocte coram eo et non sum deceptus. quo modo enim deus incorporalis et inpalpabilis manibus exquiritur, nisi operibus exquiratur?

### English translation (Claude)

You have, I think, not only what sort of person you should be when you pray, but also what you should pray for, taught not by me but by him who has deigned to teach us all. The happy life is to be sought; it is to be asked of the Lord God. What it is to be happy has been much disputed by many; but why do we go to many people and many things? It has been said briefly and truly in the Scripture of God: "Happy is the people whose God is the Lord." That we may be in that people, and may come to contemplate him and to live with him without end, "the end of the commandment is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned." In the same three, hope is put in place of a good conscience. Faith, then, and hope and love lead to God the one who prays, that is, who believes, hopes, desires, and considers what to ask of the Lord in the Lord's Prayer. Fasting, and the restraint of carnal desire from other pleasures without neglect of health, and above all almsgiving, greatly help prayer, so that we may say: "In the day of my tribulation I sought God with my hands by night before him, and I was not deceived." For how is God, who is incorporeal and intangible, sought with the hands unless he is sought by works?

### Scripture references

- Ps 144:15 (143:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:13: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 77:2 (76:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 144:15 (143:15 LXX); 1 Tim 1:5; 1 Cor 13:13 (faith, hope, love); Ps 77:2 (76:3 LXX), in the Old Latin wording.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.24 (CSEL 44:67–68; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-4/#p-130-24).

## Letter 130.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-25
- Source: CSEL 44:68–69
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We do not know what to pray for as we ought because tribulations may benefit us, as Paul learned when his prayer to remove the thorn in the flesh was refused.

### Latin text

Adhuc est fortasse, quod quaeras, cur apostolus dixerit: Quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus. neque enim ullo modo credendum est uel ipsum uel quibus ista dicebat dominicam nescisse orationem. cur ergo putamus hoc eum dixisse, quod nec temere potuit nec mendaciter dicere, nisi quia molestiae tribulationesque temporales plerumque prosunt uel ad sanandum tumorem superbiae uel ad probandam exercendamue patientiam, cui probatae et exercitatae clarior merces uberiorque seruatur, uel ad quaecumque flagellanda et abolenda peccata, tamen nos nescientes, quid ista prosint, ab omni optamus tribulatione liberari. ab hac ignorantia nec se ipsum apostolus ostendit alienum, nisi forte, quid oraret, sicut oporteret, sciebat, quando, magnitudine reuelationum ne extolleretur, datus est illi stimulus carnis, angelus satanae, qui eum colaphizaret. propter quod ter dominum rogauit, ut eum auferret ab eo, utique sicut oportet nesciens quid oraret. denique dei responsum, cur non fieret, quod uir tantus orabat, et quare fieri non expediret, audiuit: Sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam uirtus in infirmitate perficitur.

### English translation (Claude)

There is still perhaps something you may ask: why the apostle said, "For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought." For we must by no means believe that either he or those to whom he said this did not know the Lord's Prayer. Why then do we think he said this, which he could say neither rashly nor falsely, except that temporal troubles and tribulations are often beneficial, either for healing the swelling of pride, or for proving and exercising patience, for which, once proved and exercised, a more glorious and richer reward is kept, or for chastising and abolishing sins of whatever kind; and yet we, not knowing what good they do, wish to be freed from every tribulation? The apostle shows that he himself was not free from this ignorance, unless perhaps he knew what he should pray for as he ought when, lest he be exalted by the greatness of the revelations, there was given him a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan to buffet him. On account of this he asked the Lord three times to take it away from him, surely not knowing what to pray for as he ought. At last he heard God's answer why what so great a man prayed for was not done, and why it was not expedient that it should be done: "My grace is sufficient for you; for power is made perfect in weakness."

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:8: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:26; 2 Cor 12:7–9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.25 (CSEL 44:68–69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-25).

## Letter 130.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-26
- Source: CSEL 44:69–71
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God sometimes grants impatient requests in anger and refuses others in mercy; we should accept his will, as Christ did in Gethsemane.

### Latin text

In his ergo tribulationibus, quae possunt et prodesse et nocere, quid oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus et tamen, quia dura, quia molesta, quia contra sensum nostrae infirmitatis sunt, uniuersali humana uoluntate, ut a nobis haec auferantur, oramus. sed hoc deuotionis debemus domino deo nostro, ut, si ea non abstulerit, non ideo nos ab eo neglegi existimemus, sed potius pia patientia malorum bona speremus ampliora. sic enim uirtus in infirmitate perficitur. nonnullis quippe inpatientibus dominus deus, quod petebant, concessit iratus, sicut contra apostolo negauit propitius. nam legimus, Israhelitae quid et quo modo rogauerint et acceperint, sed expleta concupiscentia inpatientia est grauiter castigata. dedit et regem petentibus secundum cor eorum, sicut scriptum est, non secundum cor suum. dedit etiam, quod diabolus postulauit, ut probandus eius famulus temptaretur. exaudiuit rogantes et inmundos spiritus, ut in multos sues legio daemonum mitteretur. haec scripta sunt, ne forte se quisquam magni pendat, si fuerit exauditus, cum aliquid inpatienter petit, quod non impetrare plus prosit, aut se abiciat et de diuina erga se miseratione desperet, si non exaudiatur, cum forte aliquid petit, quo accipiendo affligatur atrocius uel a prosperitate corruptus penitus euertatur. in talibus ergo quid oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus. unde si aliquid, contra quod oramus, acciderit, patienter ferendo et in omnibus gratias agendo hoc potius oportuisse, quod dei non quod nostra uoluntas habuit, minime dubitare debemus. nam et huius modi exemplum praebuit nobis ille mediator, qui cum dixisset: Pater, si fieri potest, transeat a me calix iste, humanam in se uoluntatem ex hominis susceptione transformans continuo subiecit: Verum non quod ego uolo, sed quod tu uis, pater. unde merito per unius oboedientiam iusti constituuntur multi.

### English translation (Claude)

In these tribulations, then, which can both benefit and harm, we do not know what we should pray for as we ought; and yet, because they are hard, because they are troublesome, because they go against the feeling of our weakness, we pray with the common human will that they may be taken from us. But we owe this devotion to the Lord our God: that if he does not take them away, we should not therefore think ourselves neglected by him, but rather, by devout patience in evils, hope for greater goods. For so power is made perfect in weakness. For to some who were impatient the Lord God in anger granted what they asked, just as, on the contrary, in mercy he refused it to the apostle. For we read what the Israelites asked for, and how, and received it; but once their desire was satisfied, their impatience was severely punished. He also gave a king to those who asked, according to their heart, as it is written, not according to his own heart. He granted also what the devil requested, that his servant might be tempted in order to be proved. He heard the request even of unclean spirits, that the legion of demons might be sent into a large herd of swine. These things are written lest anyone think highly of himself if he is heard when he impatiently asks for something that it would be more profitable not to obtain, or lest he cast himself down and despair of God's mercy toward him if he is not heard, when perhaps he asks for something by receiving which he would be more grievously afflicted, or corrupted by prosperity and utterly overthrown. In such things, therefore, we do not know what we should pray for as we ought. Hence if something happens against which we pray, by bearing it patiently and giving thanks in all things we ought by no means to doubt that what God's will, and not ours, contained was rather what ought to be. For that Mediator also gave us an example of this kind: when he had said, "Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me," transforming in himself the human will by his taking of human nature, he at once added: "Yet not what I will, but what you will, Father." Hence rightly by the obedience of one many are made righteous.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 12:9: allusion, high confidence
- Num 11:33: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Sam 8:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Hos 13:11: allusion, low confidence
- Job 1:12: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 5:13: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:18: echo, medium confidence
- Matt 26:39: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 12:9; Num 11 (the quails); Hos 13:11 and 1 Sam 8 (a king "according to their heart"; the phrase is not an exact quotation); Job 1:12; Mark 5:12–13; Matt 26:39; Rom 5:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.26 (CSEL 44:69–71; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-26).

## Letter 130.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-27
- Source: CSEL 44:71–72
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The one thing, eternal contemplation of God, may be asked with certainty, yet even it surpasses understanding, so we know only what it is not.

### Latin text

Quisquis autem unam illam petit a domino et hanc requirit, certus ac securus petit nec timet, ne forte obsit, cum acceperit, sine qua nihil prodest, quicquid aliud, sicut oportet, acceperit. ipsa est enim una uera et sola beata uita, ut contemplemur domini delectationem in aeternum inmortales atque incorruptibiles corpore et spiritu. propter hanc unam cetera requiruntur et non indecenter petuntur. istam quisquis habuerit, omnia, quae uult, habebit nec aliquid ibi uelle quia nec habere poterit, quod non decebit. ibi est quippe fons uitae, quem sitire nunc oportet in oratione, quam diu in spe uiuimus et, quod speramus, nondum uidemus, in protectione alarum eius, ante quem est omne desiderium nostrum, ut inebriemur ab ubertate domus eius et torrente uoluptatis eius potemur, quoniam apud eum est fons uitae, in lumine eius uidebimus lumen, quando satiabitur in bonis desiderium nostrum et nihil erit ultra, quod gemendo quaeramus, sed quod gaudendo teneamus. uerum tamen, quoniam ipsa est pax, quae praecellit omnem intellectum, etiam ipsam in oratione poscendo, quid oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus. quod enim, sicuti est, cogitare non possumus, utique nescimus, sed, quicquid cogitanti occurrerit, abicimus, respuimus, inprobamus, non hoc esse, quod quaerimus. nouimus. quamuis illud nondum. quale sit. nouerimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But whoever asks of the Lord that one thing and seeks it asks with certainty and security, and does not fear that it may harm him when he has received it, since without it nothing else that he may receive, even rightly, is of any benefit. For this is the one true and only happy life: that, immortal and incorruptible in body and spirit, we should contemplate the delight of the Lord for ever. For the sake of this one thing the other things are sought and are not unfittingly asked for. Whoever has this will have all that he wishes, and there he will not be able to wish anything unfitting, because he will not be able to have it. For there is the fountain of life, for which we must now thirst in prayer, so long as we live in hope and do not yet see what we hope for, under the shelter of his wings, before whom is all our desire, that we may be filled with the abundance of his house and given to drink of the torrent of his pleasure; for with him is the fountain of life, in his light we shall see light, when our desire shall be satisfied with good things, and there will be nothing more that we seek with groaning, but only what we hold with joy. And yet, since this is the peace that surpasses all understanding, even when we ask for it in prayer, we do not know what we should pray for as we ought. For what we cannot think of as it is, we certainly do not know; but whatever occurs to us when we think, we cast aside, reject, and disapprove; we know that this is not what we seek, though we do not yet know what kind of thing that is.

### Scripture references

- Ps 27:4 (26:4 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 36:7 (35:8 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 36:8 (35:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 38:9 (37:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:5 (102:5 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 27:4 (26:4 LXX); Rom 8:24–25; Ps 36:7–9 (35:8–10 LXX); Ps 38:9 (37:10 LXX); Ps 103:5 (102:5 LXX); Phil 4:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.27 (CSEL 44:71–72; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-27).

## Letter 130.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-28
- Source: CSEL 44:72–73
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Spirit's intercession means that he makes the saints pray with unutterable groanings, giving them a 'learned ignorance' of what they desire.

### Latin text

Est ergo in nobis quaedam, ut ita dicam, docta ignorantia sed docta spiritu dei, qui adiuuat infirmitatem nostram. nam cum dixisset apostolus: Si autem, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus, ibi subiecit: Similiter et spiritus adiuuat infirmitatem nostram; quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus; sed ipse spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus; qui autem scrutatur corda, scit, quid spiritus sapiat, quia secundum deum interpellat pro sanctis, quod non sic est intellegendum, ut existimemus sanctum spiritum dei, qui in trinitate incommutabilis deus est et cum patre et filio unus deus, tamquam aliquem, qui non sit, quod deus est, interpellare pro sanctis; dictum est quippe: Interpellat pro sanctis, quia interpellare sanctos facit, sicut dictum est: Temptat uos dominus deus uester, ut sciat, si diligitis eum, hoc est ut scire uos faciat. interpellare itaque sanctos facit gemitibus inenarrabilibus inspirans eis desiderium etiam adhuc incognitae tantae rei, quam per patientiam expectamus. quo modo enim narretur, quando desideratur, quod ignoratur? nam utique, si omni modo ignoraretur, non desideraretur et rursus, si uideretur, non desideraretur nec gemitibus quaereretur.

### English translation (Claude)

There is therefore in us a certain learned ignorance, so to speak, but learned from the Spirit of God, who helps our weakness. For when the apostle had said, "But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience," he added: "Likewise the Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes with groanings that cannot be uttered; and he who searches the hearts knows what the Spirit has in mind, because he intercedes for the saints according to God." This is not to be understood as though we should think that the Holy Spirit of God, who in the Trinity is unchangeable God and with the Father and the Son one God, intercedes for the saints like someone who is not what God is. It is said, "He intercedes for the saints," because he makes the saints intercede, just as it was said, "The Lord your God tests you, to know whether you love him," that is, to make you know. He makes the saints intercede, then, with groanings that cannot be uttered, inspiring in them a desire for so great a thing, still unknown, for which we wait with patience. For how can what is unknown be uttered when it is desired? For certainly, if it were wholly unknown, it would not be desired; and again, if it were seen, it would not be desired nor sought with groanings.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:27: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 13:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:25–27; Deut 13:3. Augustine reads "the Spirit intercedes" as "makes the saints intercede", so as not to imply that the Spirit is less than God; the Trinitarian statement is his own.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.28 (CSEL 44:72–73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-28).

## Letter 130.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-29
- Source: CSEL 44:73–75
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Proba should pray as a widow of Christ, for Scripture specially enjoins prayer on widows, as the examples of Hannah, Anna, and the persistent widow show.

### Latin text

Haec omnia considerans et si quid aliud de hac re tibi dominus insinuauerit, quod uel mihi non occurrit uel dici a me longum fuit, concerta in oratione uincere hoc saeculum; ora in spe, ora fideliter et amanter, ora instanter atque patienter, ora sicut uidua Christi. quamuis enim ad omnia membra eius, hoc est ad omnes, qui in eum credunt et eius corpori sociantur, sicut docuit, orare pertineat, specialiter tamen diligentior cura orationum in scriptura eius uiduis inuenitur iniuncta. nam duae fuerunt Annae honorabiliter nominatae, una coniugata, quae sanctum Samuhelem peperit, alia uidua, quae sanctum sanctorum, cum adhuc infans esset, agnouit. orauit et coniugata in dolore animi et afflictione cordis, quia filios non habebat; tunc ipsum Samuhelem impetrauit et acceptum deo reddidit, quia, cum posceret, uouit. sed oratio eius quo modo ad orationem illam dominicam pertineat, non facile reperitur, nisi quia in eo, quod ibi positum est:. Libera nos a malo, non paruum malum uidetur et nuptam esse et fructum carere nuptiarum, cum sola excuset nuptias procreandorum causa filiorum. de illa uero Anna uidua uide quid scriptum sit, quia non discedebat de templo ieiuniis et obsecrationibus seruiens nocte ac die. nec aliunde apostolus, quod et supra commemoraui: Quae autem uere uidua est, inquit, et desolata, sperauit in domino et persistit in orationibus nocte ac die. et dominus cum semper orandum et non deficiendum nos hortaretur, uiduam commemorauit, quae licet iniquum et impium iudicem ac dei et hominum contemptorem ad audiendam causam suam assidue interpellando conuertit. quam ergo prae ceteris uiduae debeant uacare orationibus, satis hinc intellegi potest, quod omnibus ad suscipiendum orandi studium de uiduis propositum est exhortationis exemplum.

### English translation (Claude)

Considering all these things, and anything else on this subject that the Lord may suggest to you which either did not occur to me or would have taken too long for me to say, strive in prayer to overcome this world: pray in hope, pray faithfully and lovingly, pray urgently and patiently, pray as a widow of Christ. For although praying belongs, as he taught, to all his members, that is, to all who believe in him and are joined to his body, yet a more diligent care of prayer is found specially enjoined on widows in his Scripture. For there were two Annas mentioned with honor: one married, who bore holy Samuel; the other a widow, who recognized the Holy of Holies while he was still an infant. The married one prayed in grief of soul and affliction of heart because she had no sons; then she obtained Samuel himself, and when she received him she gave him back to God, because she had vowed this when she asked. But how her prayer belongs to the Lord's Prayer is not easily discovered, unless it is that, in the petition placed there, "Deliver us from evil," it seems no small evil both to be married and to lack the fruit of marriage, since only the purpose of begetting children excuses marriage. But see what is written of that widow Anna: that she did not depart from the temple, serving with fasting and supplications night and day. In the same way the apostle, as I mentioned above, says: "She who is truly a widow and desolate has set her hope on the Lord and perseveres in prayers night and day." And the Lord, when urging us always to pray and not lose heart, mentioned a widow who, by constantly pressing him, turned even an unjust and ungodly judge, a despiser of God and men, to hear her case. How much more than others widows ought to devote themselves to prayer can be understood well enough from the fact that the example set before all, to encourage them to take up the practice of prayer, is drawn from widows.

### Scripture references

- 1 Sam 1:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 1:11: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 1:28: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 2:36: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 2:37: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:1: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 18:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Sam 1:10–11, 27–28; Luke 2:36–38; 1 Tim 5:5; Luke 18:1–5. The remark that only the begetting of children "excuses" marriage reflects Augustine's view of the goods of marriage; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.29 (CSEL 44:73–75; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-29).

## Letter 130.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-30
- Source: CSEL 44:75–76
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Every soul away from the Lord is a widow; Proba should pray as poor and desolate, and her household of widows and virgins should do likewise.

### Latin text

Quid autem in hoc operis genere in uiduis electum est nisi destitutio et desolatio? quapropter si se omnis anima intellegat in hoc saeculo destitutam atque desolatam, quam diu peregrinatur a domino, profecto quandam uiduitatem suam deo defensori assidua et inpensissima precatione commendat. ora ergo ut uidua Christi nondum habens eius conspectum, cuius precaris auxilium, et, licet sis ditissima, sicut pauper ora; nondum enim ueras futuri saeculi diuitias habes, ubi nulla damna formides; licet habeas filios et nepotes numerosamque familiam, quod et supra dictum est, sicut desolata ora; incerta sunt enim omnia temporalia etiam usque in finem uitae huius in nostram consolationem mansura. tu autem si ea, quae sursum sunt, quaeris et sapis, aeterna et certa desideras, quae quam diu nondum habes, etiam saluis omnibus atque obsequentibus tuis tamquam desolatam deputare te debes et, si tu, profecto etiam tuo exemplo religiosissima nurus tua et aliae sanctae uiduae uirginesque sub uestra cura securius constitutae; quanto enim magis domum uestram pie tractatis, tanto inpensius orationibus instare debetis rerum praesentium non occupatae negotiis, nisi quae flagitat causa pietatis.

### English translation (Claude)

What is it, in this kind of work, that is chosen in widows, if not their destitution and desolation? Therefore, if every soul understands itself to be destitute and desolate in this world, so long as it is away from the Lord, it surely commends its widowhood, as it were, to God its defender with constant and most earnest prayer. Pray, then, as a widow of Christ, who does not yet have the sight of him whose help you implore; and though you are very rich, pray as one poor; for you do not yet have the true riches of the world to come, where you need fear no loss. Though you have sons and grandsons and a numerous household, as was said above, pray as one desolate; for all temporal things are uncertain, even those that will remain for our consolation to the end of this life. But if you seek and set your mind on the things that are above, you desire what is eternal and certain; and so long as you do not yet have these, even when all your family are safe and attentive to you, you ought to count yourself desolate; and if you do, surely by your example so will your most devout daughter-in-law and the other holy widows and virgins established more securely under your care. For the more devoutly you manage your household, the more earnestly you ought to apply yourselves to prayer, not occupied with the business of present things except what the cause of devotion demands.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:1: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:6; Col 3:1–2. Proba's daughter-in-law is Juliana, mother of the virgin Demetrias.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.30 (CSEL 44:75–76; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-30).

## Letter 130.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-31
- Source: CSEL 44:76–77
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks for their prayers and urges them to fast and keep vigil according to each one's strength, without hindering or pressing one another.

### Latin text

Sane memineritis et pro nobis non neglegenter orare. nolumus enim sic nobis honorem, quem periculosum gerimus, deferatis, ut adiutorium, quod necessarium nouimus, auferatis. a familia Christi oratum est pro Petro, oratum est pro Paulo; et uos in eius familia esse gaudemus et incomparabiliter plus quam Petrus et Paulus orationum fraternarum auxiliis indigemus. orate certatim concordi sanctoque certamine; non enim aduersus alterutrum certatis sed aduersus diabolum sanctis omnibus inimicum. in ieiuniis et uigiliis et omni castigatione corporis, qua plurimum adiuuatur oratio, faciat quaeque uestrum, quod poterit; quod altera minus potest, ea, quae potest, faciat, si in altera diligit, quod ideo, quia non potest ipsa, non facit. proinde, quae minus ualet, non impediat plus ualentem et, quae plus ualet, non urgeat minus ualentem. conscientiam quippe uestram deo debetis; nemini autem uestrum aliquid debeatis, nisi ut inuicem diligatis. exaudiat te dominus, qui potens est facere supra, quam petimus et intellegimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Be sure to remember also to pray earnestly for us. For we do not wish you so to pay us the honor of an office that we bear with danger as to withdraw the help that we know to be necessary. The household of Christ prayed for Peter, prayed for Paul; and we rejoice that you are in his household, and we need the help of brotherly prayers incomparably more than Peter and Paul. Pray in rivalry, with a harmonious and holy rivalry; for you do not strive against one another but against the devil, the enemy of all the saints. In fasting and vigils and every chastening of the body, by which prayer is greatly helped, let each of you do what she can; what one is less able to do, let her who is able do it, provided that the other loves in her what she herself does not do only because she cannot. Accordingly, let her who is weaker not hinder the stronger, and let her who is stronger not press the weaker. For you owe your conscience to God; but owe nothing to anyone, except to love one another. May the Lord hear you, who is able to do beyond what we ask and understand.

### Scripture references

- Acts 12:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:8: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 12:5; Rom 13:8; Eph 3:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 130.31 (CSEL 44:76–77; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-130-31).

## Letter 131.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-131-1
- Source: CSEL 44:77–79
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Proba that the evils of this life, borne with patience and thanksgiving, are turned to good and lead the soul to seek its true rest.

### Latin text

Est quidem ita, ut dicis, quod in corpore corruptibili anima constituta terrena quadam contagione constringitur et tali onere quodam modo depressa curuatur, ut in imo multa quam in summo unum facilius concupiscat et cogitet. nam hoc etiam sancta scriptura ita dicit: Corpus enim, quod corrumpitur, adgrauat animam et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem. sed ideo uenit saluator noster, qui mulierem illam in euangelio per decem et octo annos curuam, quae fortasse hoc significabat, uerbo salutis erexit, ut anima Christiana non frustra audiat: sursum cor, nec frustra respondeat se habere ad dominum. quod intuens recte facis mala huius mundi tolerabilia ducere spe futuri. sic enim usu quodam bono conuertuntur in bonum, dum non augent nostram concupiscentiam, sed exercent patientiam. de qua re apostolus ait: Scimus, quoniam diligentibus deum omnia cooperatur in bonum. omnia inquit, non solum ergo illa, quae appetuntur ut suauia, uerum etiam illa, quae ut molesta uitantur, quando alia sic sumimus, ne capiamur, alia sic ferimus, ne frangamur, et secundum praecepta diuina in omnibus gratias agimus ei, de quo dicimus: Benedicam dominum in omni tempore; semper laus eius in ore meo et: Bonum est mihi, quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas. neque enim re uera, si fallacis prosperitatis semper hic tranquillitas adrideret, anima humana portum illum uerae certaeque securitatis appeteret, domina insignis et merito inlustris et praestantissima filia. reddens itaque debitum praestantiae tuae salutationis obsequium agensque gratias, quod salutis nostrae religiosissimam curam geris, posco tibi a domino futurae uitae praemia praesentisque solacia omniumque uestrum, in quorum cordibus per fidem habitat Christus, me dilectioni orationique commendo. [Et alia manu:] Deus uerus et uerax ueraciter consoletur cor tuum et protegat salutem tuam, domina insignis ac merito inlustris ac praestantissima filia.

### English translation (Claude)

It is indeed as you say: the soul, placed in a corruptible body, is bound by a kind of earthly contagion and is in a way so pressed down and bent by such a burden that it more easily desires and thinks of many things below than of the one thing above. For holy Scripture also says so: "For the body which is corrupted weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind that thinks of many things." But our Savior came for this reason, he who by a word of healing raised up that woman in the Gospel who had been bent over for eighteen years (and she perhaps signified this), so that the Christian soul may not hear "Lift up your heart" in vain, nor answer in vain that it has it lifted up to the Lord. Considering this, you rightly regard the evils of this world as bearable in the hope of the world to come. For so, by a kind of good use, they are turned into good, since they do not increase our desire but exercise our patience. Of this the apostle says: "We know that for those who love God all things work together for good." "All things," he says; not only, then, those that are sought as pleasant, but also those that are avoided as troublesome, when we take the former in such a way as not to be caught by them, and bear the latter in such a way as not to be broken by them, and according to the divine precepts give thanks in all things to him of whom we say: "I will bless the Lord at all times; his praise shall always be in my mouth," and: "It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your statutes." For indeed, if the calm of deceitful prosperity always smiled on us here, the human soul would not seek that harbor of true and certain security, my distinguished lady, deservedly illustrious and most excellent daughter. Therefore, paying the duty of greeting owed to your excellence, and giving thanks that you take most devout care for our welfare, I ask of the Lord for you the rewards of the life to come and the consolations of the present, and I commend myself to the love and prayers of all of you in whose hearts Christ dwells through faith. [And in another hand:] May the true and truthful God truly console your heart and protect your welfare, my distinguished lady, deservedly illustrious and most excellent daughter.

### Scripture references

- Luke 13:11: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 13:13: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:18: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 34:1 (33:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:71 (118:71 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 131 is to Proba. Quotations: Wisdom 9:15; Luke 13:11–13 (the bent woman); "Lift up your heart" is the dialogue of the eucharistic liturgy; Rom 8:28; 1 Thess 5:18; Ps 34:1 (33:2 LXX); Ps 119:71 (118:71 LXX); Eph 3:17. The bracketed words mark the autograph closing as printed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 131.1 (CSEL 44:77–79; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-131-1).

## Letter 132.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-132-1
- Source: CSEL 44:79–80
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Volusian to read the Scriptures, especially the apostles, and to write to him with any questions.

### Latin text

De salute tua, quam et in hoc saeculo et in Christo esse cupio, sanctae matris tuae uotis sum fortasse etiam ipse non inpar. unde meritis tuis reddens salutationis obsequium hortor, ut ualeo, ut litterarum uere certeque sanctarum te curam non pigeat inpendere. sincera enim et solida res est nec fucatis eloquiis ambit ad animum nec ullo linguae tectorio inane aliquid ac pendulum crepitat. multum mouet non uerborum sed rerum auidum et multum terret factura securum. praecipue apostolorum linguas exhortor ut legas; ex his enim ad cognoscendos prophetas excitaberis, quorum testimoniis utuntur apostoli. si quid autem, uel cum legis uel cum cogitas, tibi oritur quaestionis, in quo dissoluendo uidear necessarius, scribe, ut rescribam. magis enim hoc forte adiuuante domino potero quam praesens talia loqui tecum non solum propter occupationes uarias et meas et tuas, quoniam non, cum mihi uacat, occurrit, ut et tibi uacet, uerum etiam propter eorum inruentem praesentiam, qui plerumque non sunt apti tali negotio magisque linguae certaminibus quam scientiae luminibus delectantur. quod autem scriptum habetur, semper uacat ad legendum, cum uacat legenti, nec onerosum fit praesens, quod, cum uoles, sumitur, cum uoles, ponitur.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your welfare, which I wish to be both in this world and in Christ, I am perhaps not unequal even to the prayers of your holy mother. Therefore, returning the greeting due to your merits, I urge you, as far as I can, not to grudge the care you give to the writings that are truly and certainly holy. For it is a genuine and solid thing; it does not court the mind with painted eloquence, nor does it rattle out anything empty and hollow under a veneer of language. It greatly moves one who is eager not for words but for realities, and it greatly alarms the one whom it is going to make secure. I urge you above all to read the apostles' writings; for from these you will be stirred to come to know the prophets, whose testimonies the apostles use. And if, either in reading or in reflecting, any question arises for you in resolving which I may seem needed, write, so that I may write back. For with the Lord's help I shall perhaps be better able to do this than to discuss such things with you in person, not only because of the various occupations both mine and yours (for when I am free it does not happen that you are free too), but also because of the intruding presence of people who are often not suited to such business and take more delight in contests of tongue than in the light of knowledge. But what is set down in writing is always free to be read when the reader is free, and it does not become burdensome by its presence, since it is taken up when you wish and put down when you wish.

### Translation notes

- Letter 132 is to Volusian, a pagan Roman aristocrat (his mother was a Christian).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 132.1 (CSEL 44:79–80; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-132-1).

## Letter 133.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-1
- Source: CSEL 44:80–82
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begs the tribune Marcellinus not to put to death the Donatist clerics and Circumcellions who confessed to murdering and maiming Catholic presbyters.

### Latin text

Circumcelliones illos et clericos partis Donati, quos de Hipponiensi ad iudicium pro factis eorum publicae disciplinae cura deduxerat, a tua nobilitate comperi auditos et plurimos eorum de homicidio, quod in Restitutum, catholicum presbyterum, commiserunt, et de caede Innocentii, alterius catholici presbyteri, atque de oculo eius effosso et digito praeciso fuisse confessos. unde mihi sollicitudo maxima incussa est, ne forte sublimitas tua censeat eos tanta legum seueritate plectendos, ut, qualia fecerunt, talia patiantur. ideoque his litteris obtestor fidem tuam, quam habes in Christo, per ipsius domini Christi misericordiam, ut hoc nec facias nec fieri omnino permittas. quamuis enim ab eorum interitu dissimulare possumus, qui non accusantibus nostris sed illorum notoria, ad quos tuendae publicae pacis uigilantia pertinebat, praesentati uideantur examini, nolumus tamen passiones seruorum dei quasi uice talionis paribus suppliciis uindicari, non quo scelestis hominibus licentiam facinorum prohibeamus auferri, sed hoc magis sufficere uolumus, ut uiui et nulla corporis parte truncati uel ab inquietudine insana ad sanitatis otium legum cohercitione dirigantur uel a malignis operibus alicui utili operi deputentur. uocatur quidem et ista damnatio, sed quis non intellegat magis beneficium quam supplicium nuncupandum, ubi nec saeuiendi relaxetur audacia nec paenitendi medicina subtrahatur?

### English translation (Claude)

I have learned that Your Nobility has heard the Circumcellions and clerics of the party of Donatus whom the care for public order had brought from the district of Hippo to trial for their deeds, and that most of them have confessed to the murder they committed against Restitutus, a Catholic presbyter, and to the beating of Innocentius, another Catholic presbyter, and to gouging out his eye and cutting off his finger. This has struck me with the greatest anxiety lest Your Sublimity should judge that they must be punished with such severity of the laws that they suffer what they did. Therefore by this letter I implore you, by the faith you have in Christ, by the mercy of the Lord Christ himself, neither to do this nor to allow it to be done at all. For although we could keep silent about the death of those who appear to have been brought to examination not on the accusation of our people but by the report of those whose duty it was to watch over the public peace, yet we do not wish the sufferings of the servants of God to be avenged by equal punishments, as by retaliation. Not that we object to wicked men being deprived of the freedom to commit crimes; but we wish rather that it should suffice that, alive and not mutilated in any part of the body, they should either be directed by the restraint of the laws from their insane restlessness to the quiet of sanity, or be removed from their evil works and assigned to some useful work. This too is indeed called a condemnation; but who does not understand that it should be called a benefit rather than a punishment, when neither is license given to savage boldness nor is the medicine of repentance withdrawn?

### Translation notes

- Letter 133 is to the tribune and notary Flavius Marcellinus. The Circumcellions were bands associated with the Donatist party. Augustine asks for punishment short of death or mutilation; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 133.1 (CSEL 44:80–82; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-1).

## Letter 133.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-2
- Source: CSEL 44:82–83
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Marcellinus, who obtained the confessions without torture, to show the same mildness in sentencing, so that Christian gentleness may be seen.

### Latin text

Imple, Christiane iudex, pii patris officium, sic suscense iniquitati, ut consulere humanitati memineris nec in peccatorum atrocitatibus exerceas ulciscendi libidinem, sed peccatorum uulneribus curandi adhibeas uoluntatem. noli perdere paternam diligentiam, quam in ipsa inquisitione seruasti, quando tantorum scelerum confessionem non extendente eculeo, non sulcantibus ungulis, non urentibus flammis sed uirgarum uerberibus eruisti. qui modus cohercitionis et a magistris artium liberalium et ab ipsis parentibus et saepe etiam in iudiciis solet ab episcopis haberi. noli ergo atrocius uindicare, quod lenius inuenisti. inquirendi quam puniendi necessitas maior est; ad hoc enim et mitissimi homines facinus occultatum diligenter atque instanter examinant, ut inueniant, quibus parcant. unde plerumque necesse est, exerceatur acrius inquisitio, ut manifestato scelere sit, ubi appareat mansuetudo. omnia quippe bona opera amant in luce constitui non propter humanam gloriam, sed ut uideant, ait dominus, bona opera uestra et glorificent patrem uestrum, qui in caelis est. et ideo non sufficit apostolo monere, ut mansuetudinem seruaremus, sed ut eam etiam notam omnibus faceremus: Mansuetudo, inquit, uestra nota sit omnibus hominibus, et alio loco: Mansuetudinem ostentantes ad omnes homines, ut nec illa sancti Dauid, quando inimico sibi in manus tradito clementer pepercit, praeclarissima lenitas emineret, nisi potestas pariter appareret. non te ergo exasperet uindicandi potestas, cui lenitatem non excussit examinandi necessitas. noli facinore inuento quaerere percussorem, in quo inueniendo noluisti adhibere tortorem.

### English translation (Claude)

Fulfil, Christian judge, the duty of a devoted father: be angry at wickedness in such a way that you remember to consider humanity, and do not indulge the lust for vengeance in the atrocity of sins, but apply the will to heal the wounds of sinners. Do not lose the fatherly care which you kept in the very inquiry, when you extracted the confession of such great crimes not by the rack stretching the body, not by the claws furrowing it, not by flames burning it, but by beating with rods. This manner of coercion is commonly used by teachers of the liberal arts, by parents themselves, and often also by bishops in their courts. Do not, then, punish more harshly what you discovered more gently. There is greater need to inquire than to punish; for even the gentlest men examine a hidden crime diligently and urgently for this purpose, that they may find whom to spare. Hence it is often necessary that the inquiry be carried on more sharply, so that when the crime has been brought to light there may be room for clemency to appear. For all good works love to be set in the light, not for human glory, but "that they may see your good works," the Lord says, "and glorify your Father who is in heaven." And so it was not enough for the apostle to admonish us to keep gentleness, but also to make it known to all: "Let your gentleness," he says, "be known to all people"; and in another place: "showing gentleness to all people." So too that most illustrious mildness of holy David, when he mercifully spared his enemy delivered into his hands, would not stand out unless his power had equally appeared. Let not the power to punish, then, make you harsh, when the necessity of examining did not shake your mildness. Having discovered the crime, do not seek an executioner, when in discovering it you would not employ a torturer.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Sam 24:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 26:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:16; Phil 4:5; Titus 3:2; David's sparing of Saul, 1 Sam 24 and 26. The beating with rods during inquiry is described as customary; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 133.2 (CSEL 44:82–83; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-2).

## Letter 133.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-3
- Source: CSEL 44:83–84
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine, speaking as a bishop, says that clemency serves the church, and asks Marcellinus to pass his letter to the proconsul.

### Latin text

Postremo pro ecclesiae utilitate missus es. hoc ecclesiae catholicae aut, ut modum dispensationis meae non supergredi uidear, hoc ecclesiae ad Hipponiensium-Regiorum dioecesim pertinenti prodesse, hoc expedire contestor. si non audis amicum petentem, audi episcopum consulentem, quamuis, quoniam Christiano loquor, maxime in tali causa non arroganter dixerim, audire te episcopum conuenit iubentem, domine eximie et merito insignis atque carissime fili. unde scio quidem causas ecclesiasticas excellentiae tuae potissimum iniunctas, sed quia credo istam curam ad uirum clarissimum atque spectabilem proconsulem pertinere, ad eum quoque litteras dedi, quas rogo ut ipse illi tradere et allegare, si opus est, non graueris. atque ambos obsecro, ne importunam arbitremini uel intercessionem uel suggestionem uel sollicitudinem nostram et passiones catholicorum seruorum dei, quae infirmis ad aedificationem spiritalem utiles esse debent, haud reciproca inimicorum, a quibus passi sunt, poena decoloretis, sed potius refracta iudiciaria seueritate et uestram fidem, quia filii estis ecclesiae, et ipsius matris mansuetudinem commendare minime neglegatis. deus omnipotens praestantiam tuam bonis omnibus augeat, domine eximie et merito insignis atque carissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, you were sent for the benefit of the church. I solemnly declare that this is of benefit to the Catholic Church, or, lest I seem to go beyond the bounds of my stewardship, to the church belonging to the diocese of Hippo Regius; this is what is expedient. If you do not listen to a friend who asks, listen to a bishop who counsels; although, since I am speaking to a Christian, I may say without arrogance, especially in such a case, that it befits you to listen to a bishop who commands, my excellent lord, deservedly distinguished and dearest son. I know, indeed, that church cases have been entrusted chiefly to Your Excellency; but because I believe that this matter belongs to the most illustrious and honorable proconsul, I have also given a letter to him, which I ask you not to mind handing to him yourself and supporting, if need be. And I beseech you both not to regard our intercession, suggestion, or anxiety as importunate, and not to tarnish the sufferings of the Catholic servants of God, which ought to be useful for the spiritual edification of the weak, by a punishment of their enemies, by whom they suffered, in kind; but rather, setting aside judicial severity, by no means to neglect to commend both your own faith, since you are sons of the church, and the gentleness of the mother herself. May almighty God increase Your Excellence in every good thing, my excellent lord, deservedly distinguished and dearest son.

### Translation notes

- The proconsul is Apringius, Marcellinus's brother, to whom Letter 134 is addressed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 133.3 (CSEL 44:83–84; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-133-3).

## Letter 134.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-1
- Source: CSEL 44:84–85
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the proconsul Apringius, a Christian, reminding him of God's judgment and asking leave to advise him.

### Latin text

Non dubito in hac potestate, quam tibi deus homini in homines dedit, cogitare te diuinum iudicium, ubi et iudices stabunt rationem de suo iudicio reddituri. Christiana quippe fide te inbutum scio, unde mihi ad excellentiam tuam maior fiducia tribuitur non solum petendi uerum etiam monendi propter illum dominum, in cuius familia nobiscum caelesti iure censeris, in quo spem uitae aeternae pariter habemus et quem pro uobis in sacrosanctis mysteriis inuocamus. proinde, domine insignis et merito sublimis ac praestantissime fili, primum quaeso, ut non tibi uidear importunus inruere actibus tuis ea sollicitudine, quam me praecipue gerere oportet pro ecclesia mihi credita, cuius utilitatibus seruio, cui non tam praeesse quam prodesse desidero. deinde obsecro, ut, quod moneo uel rogo, non dedigneris accipere, non cuncteris adquiescere.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not doubt that in this power which God has given you, a man over men, you think of the divine judgment, where judges too will stand to give account of their own judgment. For I know that you are imbued with the Christian faith, which gives me greater confidence toward Your Excellency, not only to ask but also to admonish, for the sake of that Lord in whose household you are enrolled with us by heavenly right, in whom we share alike the hope of eternal life, and whom we invoke for you in the sacred mysteries. Therefore, my distinguished lord, deservedly exalted and most excellent son, I ask first that I may not seem to you to intrude importunately upon your official acts with that anxiety which I am bound above all to bear for the church entrusted to me, whose interests I serve, and which I desire not so much to preside over as to benefit. Next, I beseech you not to disdain to accept what I advise or ask, and not to hesitate to agree to it.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:10: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 134 is to Apringius, proconsul of Africa and brother of Marcellinus. "The sacred mysteries" is the Eucharist. Rom 14:10–12 and 2 Cor 5:10 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 134.1 (CSEL 44:84–85; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-1).

## Letter 134.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-2
- Source: CSEL 44:85–86
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Apringius of the Donatists' confessed crimes and begs him not to sentence them to death.

### Latin text

Circumcelliones quosdam et clericos Donatistas cura eorum, qui disciplinae publicae inseruiunt, praemissa notoria ad iudicia legesque perduxit. hi cum audirentur a uiro clarissimo et spectabili tribuno et notario fratre tuo, filio meo Marcellino, non tormentis ungularum atque flammarum sed uirgarum coherciti horrenda facinora in fratres et conpresbyteros meos a se perpetrata confessi sunt, quod scilicet unum eorum exceptum insidiis trucidauerint, alterum e domo raptum oculo effosso digitoque amputato truncauerint. haec cum comperissem illos fuisse confessos ideoque minime dubitarem sub iura tuae securis esse uenturos, has ad tuam nobilitatem litteras acceleraui, quibus deprecor et per misericordiam Christi obsecro, sic de tua maiore atque certiore felicitate gaudeamus, ut eis paria non retribuantur, quamquam lapidis ictibus digitum praecidere oculumque conuellere leges puniendo non possint, quod isti saeuiendo potuerunt. unde securus sum de his, qui hoc se fecisse confessi sunt, quod hanc uicissitudinem non reportabunt; sed ne uel ipsi uel illi, quorum homicidium patefactum est, per tuae potestatis sententiam multentur, hoc timeo, hoc ne fiat et Christianus iudicem rogo et Christianum episcopus moneo.

### English translation (Claude)

The care of those who serve public order, after a report had been sent ahead, has brought certain Circumcellions and Donatist clerics before the courts and the laws. When they were heard by the most illustrious and honorable tribune and notary, your brother, my son Marcellinus, being coerced not by the torments of claws and flames but by rods, they confessed the horrible crimes they had committed against my brothers and fellow presbyters: namely, that they had ambushed and slaughtered one of them, and had dragged the other from his house and mutilated him, gouging out his eye and cutting off his finger. When I had learned that they had confessed this, and so had no doubt that they would come under the jurisdiction of your axe, I hastened to send this letter to Your Nobility, in which I entreat you and beseech you by the mercy of Christ, so may we rejoice in your greater and more certain happiness, that like for like may not be paid back to them; although the laws in punishing cannot cut off a finger and pluck out an eye with blows of a stone, as these men could in their savagery. So I am secure about those who confessed that they did this, that they will not receive this retribution; but I fear lest either they or those by whom the murder was clearly committed should be punished by death through the sentence of your authority. That this may not happen, I ask you as a Christian asks a judge, and I admonish you as a bishop admonishes a Christian.

### Translation notes

- "Paria non retribuantur": no retaliation in kind. The digital text's "multentur" is taken in the sense of capital punishment, as the context ("your axe", "murder") requires.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 134.2 (CSEL 44:85–86; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-2).

## Letter 134.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-3
- Source: CSEL 44:86
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The sword is given to the magistrate, but the church's cause calls for clemency, and Augustine appeals to Apringius as a fellow Christian.

### Latin text

De uobis quidem dixisse apostolum legimus, quod non sine causa gladium geratis et ministri dei sitis, uindices in eos, qui male agunt. sed alia causa est prouinciae, alia est ecclesiae: illius terribiliter gerenda est administratio, huius clementer commendanda est mansuetudo. si apud iudicem non Christianum mihi sermo esset, aliter agerem nec tamen etiam sic ecclesiae causam desererem et, quantum admittere dignaretur, instarem, ne passiones seruorum dei catholicorum, quae prodesse debent ad exempla patientiae, inimicorum suorum sanguine foedarentur, et, si nollet adquiescere, inimico animo eum resistere suspicarer. nunc uero, quando apud te res agitur, alia mihi ratio est, alia consultatio. rectorem te quidem praecelsae potestatis uidemus, sed etiam filium Christianae pietatis agnoscimus. subdatur sublimitas tua, subdatur fides tua; causam tecum tracto communem, sed tu in ea potes, quod ego non possum; confer nobiscum consilium et porrige auxilium.

### English translation (Claude)

We read indeed that the apostle said of you that you do not bear the sword without cause and are ministers of God, avengers against those who do evil. But the cause of the province is one thing, the cause of the church another: the administration of the one must be conducted with terror, the gentleness of the other must be commended with clemency. If I were speaking to a judge who was not a Christian, I would act otherwise; yet even so I would not abandon the church's cause, and, as far as he would deign to permit, I would insist that the sufferings of the Catholic servants of God, which ought to be of benefit as examples of patience, should not be defiled by the blood of their enemies; and if he would not agree, I would suspect that he was resisting with a hostile mind. But now, since the matter is being dealt with before you, my reasoning is different, and my counsel different. We see you, indeed, as the governor of a most exalted power, but we also recognize you as a son of Christian piety. Let your sublimity submit, let your faith submit. I am treating with you a common cause, but in it you can do what I cannot; take counsel with us and stretch out your help.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 13:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 134.3 (CSEL 44:86; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-3).

## Letter 134.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-4
- Source: CSEL 44:86–89
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that executing the Donatists would discredit the church's martyrs and asks Apringius to spare them so that they may have time to repent.

### Latin text

Diligenter actum est, ut inimici ecclesiae, qui solent uaniloquio seductionis sollicitare animos inperitos tamquam de persecutione gloriantes, quam se perpeti iactant, horrenda facinora sua in catholicos clericos perpetrata faterentur et suis uerbis implicarentur. legenda sunt gesta ad sanandas animas, quas pestifera suasione uenenauerunt. numquid placet tibi, ut ad finem gestorum, si cruentum istorum supplicium continebit, legendo peruenire timeamus, ubi ponimus et ipsam conscientiam, ne malum pro malo, qui passi sunt, reddidisse uideantur? si ergo nihil aliud constitueretur frenandae malitiae perditorum, extrema fortasse necessitas, ut tales occiderentur, urgeret, quamquam, quod ad nos adtinet, si nihil mitius eis fieri posset, mallemus eos liberos relaxari, quam passiones fratrum nostrorum fuso eorum sanguine uindicari. nunc uero cum et aliquid fieri possit, quo et mitis commendetur ecclesia et inmitium cohibeatur audacia, cur non flectas in partem prouidentiorem lenioremque sententiam, quod licet iudicibus facere etiam non in causis ecclesiae? time ergo nobiscum iudicium dei patris et commenda mansuetudinem matris. cum enim tu facis, ecclesia facit, propter quam facis et cuius filius facis. contende bonitate cum malis. illi scelere immani membra de corpore uiuo auulserunt, tu opere misericordi effice, ut illa, quae nefandis operibus exercebant, alicui utili operi integra eorum membra deseruiant; illi non pepercerunt correctionem sibi praedicantibus dei seruis, tu parce comprehensis, parce ductis, parce conuictis; illi impio ferro fuderunt sanguinem Christianum, tu ab eorum sanguine etiam iuridicum gladium cohibe propter Christum; illi ministro ecclesiae occiso extorserunt spatium uiuendi, tu inimicis ecclesiae uiuentibus relaxa spatium paenitendi. talem te oportet esse in causa ecclesiae iudicem Christianum petentibus, monentibus, intercedentibus nobis. solent homines, quando cum inimicis eorum conuictis lenius agitur, a mitiore sententia prouocare; sed inimicos nostros ita diligimus, ut, nisi de tua Christiana oboedientia praesumamus, a tua seuera sententia prouocemus. deus omnipotens excellentiam tuam auctiorem felicioremque conseruet, domine insignis et merito sublimis ac praestantissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

Diligent care was taken that the enemies of the church, who are accustomed to stir up ignorant minds by the empty talk of their seduction, as if glorying in the persecution they boast of suffering, should confess the horrible crimes they committed against Catholic clerics, and be entangled in their own words. The records must be read to heal the souls they have poisoned with their pestilent persuasion. Would you wish us to be afraid to read on to the end of the records, if they contain the bloody punishment of these men, where we place the very conscience of the case, lest those who suffered seem to have returned evil for evil? If, then, nothing else were laid down for restraining the malice of the lost, perhaps extreme necessity would press for such men to be put to death; although, as far as we are concerned, if nothing milder could be done to them, we would rather they were set free than that the sufferings of our brothers should be avenged by shedding their blood. But now, since something can be done by which both the gentle church may be commended and the boldness of the cruel restrained, why do you not bend your sentence toward the more prudent and milder side, which judges are permitted to do even in cases not of the church? Fear, then, with us the judgment of God the Father, and commend the gentleness of the mother. For when you act, the church acts, for whose sake you act and as whose son you act. Contend with the wicked in goodness. They by monstrous crime tore limbs from a living body; you by a work of mercy cause their limbs, kept whole, to serve some useful work instead of the wicked works they used to practice. They did not spare the servants of God who preached correction to them; you spare them now that they are arrested, spare them now that they are brought to trial, spare them now that they are convicted. They with impious steel shed Christian blood; you for Christ's sake keep even the sword of justice from their blood. They, having killed a minister of the church, cut short his time to live; you grant the enemies of the church, while they live, time to repent. Such a Christian judge you ought to be in the church's cause, while we ask, admonish, and intercede. People usually appeal against a milder sentence when their enemies, after conviction, are treated more leniently; but we so love our enemies that, unless we presumed on your Christian obedience, we would appeal against your severe sentence. May almighty God keep Your Excellency in ever greater power and happiness, my distinguished lord, deservedly exalted and most excellent son.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: echo, medium confidence
- Rom 12:21: echo, medium confidence
- Matt 5:44: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 12:17, 21 (echo); Matt 5:44. "Extorserunt spatium uiuendi" is taken as "cut short (wrested away) his time to live". Augustine says he would appeal against a death sentence; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 134.4 (CSEL 44:86–89; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-134-4).

## Letter 135.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-135-1
- Source: CSEL 44:89–91
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Volusian writes to Augustine describing a gathering of friends where rhetoric, poetry, and the philosophical schools were discussed.

### Latin text

Petis me, uir probitatis iustitiaeque documentum, ut aliqua ex ambiguis lectionis peritae discenda perconter. amplector gratiam muneris imperati meque libens in disciplinas tuas offero ueteris sententiae auctoritatem secutus, quae nullam ad perdiscendum abundare credit aetatem. neque inmerito sapiens prudentiae studia nullis terminis neque fine conclusit, quando primordiis suis remota uirtus numquam adeo reseratur adeuntibus, ut omnis protinus ad agnitionem patescat, domine uere sancte ac merito uenerabilis pater. est operae pretium cognoscere habitam inter nos proxime confabulationem. quibusdam amicorum conuentibus aderamus, frequentes proferebantur illic pro ingeniis studiisque sententiae. erat tamen sermo rhetorica partitio. apud agnoscentem loquor; etiam ista paulo ante docuisti. adstruebatur, quid esset inuentionis acrimonia, quantus disponendi labor, quae translationis gratia, quae iconismatum pulchritudo et pro ingenio naturaque materiae adposita etiam dicendi facultas. alii rursum poeticam eleuabant fauentes; ne hanc quidem eloquentiae partem tacitam aut inhonoram relinquis, ut conuenienter poeta dixerit: Inter uictrices hederam tibi serpere laurus. dicebatur ergo, quantus oeconomiae esset ornatus, quae metaphorarum uenustas, quanta in comparatione sublimitas; iam leues enodesque uersus atque, ut ita dixerim, caesurarum modulata uariatio. tunc ad familiarem tuam philosophiam sermo deflectit, quam ipse Aristoteleo more tamquam esotericam fouere consueueras. quaerebamus, et quid egerit praeceptor ex Lycio, quid Academiae multiplex et continuata cunctatio, quid ille disputator ex porticu, quid physicorum peritia, quid Epicureorum uoluptas, quid inter omnes infinita disputandi libido tuncque magis ignorata ueritas, postquam praesumptum est, quod possit agnosci.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask me, you who are a model of uprightness and justice, to put to you some of the obscure points of learned reading that I want to learn. I embrace the favor of the gift you have bidden, and willingly offer myself to your teaching, following the authority of the ancient saying which holds that no age is too advanced for thorough learning. Nor without reason did the wise man set no limits or end to the pursuit of wisdom, since virtue, withdrawn in its first beginnings, is never so opened to those who approach it that it lies open at once to full knowledge, my truly holy lord and deservedly venerable father. It is worth while to learn of a conversation we recently held among ourselves. I was present at a gathering of some friends, and many opinions were offered there according to each one's talents and studies. Yet the talk was a division of rhetoric. I speak to one who knows; you taught these very things a little while ago. It was discussed what the sharpness of invention is, how great the labor of arrangement, what the grace of metaphor, what the beauty of similes, and the power of speaking suited to the talent and nature of the subject. Others again extolled poetry with favor; you do not leave even this part of eloquence silent or unhonored, so that the poet might fittingly have said: "Ivy creeping for you among the victor's laurels." It was said, then, how great is the adornment of arrangement, what the charm of metaphors, how great the sublimity in comparison; then the smooth and knotless verses, and, so to speak, the modulated variety of the caesuras. Then the talk turned to philosophy, familiar to you, which you yourself were accustomed to cherish, in the Aristotelian manner, as if esoteric. We asked what the teacher from the Lyceum had achieved, what the manifold and continual suspension of judgment of the Academy, what that disputant from the Porch, what the skill of the natural philosophers, what the pleasure of the Epicureans, what the endless lust for disputing among them all, and truth then even more unknown, once it was presumed that it could be known.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Ecl. 8.13 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 135 is from Volusian to Augustine. The verse is Virgil, Eclogue 8.13. The schools named are the Peripatetics (Lyceum), the Academy, the Stoics (Porch), the natural philosophers, and the Epicureans. Several rhetorical terms ("oeconomia", "iconismata") are rendered by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 135.1 (CSEL 44:89–91; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-135-1).

## Letter 135.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-135-2
- Source: CSEL 44:91–93
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Volusian reports a friend's objections to the incarnation, the virgin birth, and Christ's miracles, and asks Augustine to answer them.

### Latin text

Dum in his confabulatio nostra remoratur, unus e multis: Et quis inquit, est sapientia ad perfectum Christianitatis inbutus, qui ambigua, in quibus haereo, possit aperire dubiosque adsensus meos uera uel uerisimili credulitate firmare? stupemus tacentes. tunc in haec sponte prorumpit: Miror, utrum mundi dominus et rector intemeratae feminae corpus impleuerit, pertulerit decem mensium longa illa fastidia mater et tamen uirgo enixa sit sollemnitate pariendi et post haec uirginitas putatur intacta. his et alia subnectit: Intra corpusculum uagientis infantiae latet. cui par uix putatur uniuersitas, patitur puerilitatis annos, adolescit, iuuentute solidatur; tam diu a sedibus suis abest ille regnator atque ad unum corpusculum totius mundi cura transfertur; deinde in somnos resoluitur, cibo alitur, omnes mortalium sentit affectus nec ullis competentibus signis tantae maiestatis indicia clarescunt; larualis illa purgatio, debilium curae, reddita uita defunctis haec, si et alios cogites, deo parua sunt interuenimus ulterius inquirenti solutumque conuentum ad potioris peritiae merita distulimus, ne, dum incautius secreta temerantur, in culpam deflecteret error innocuus. accepisti, uir totius gloriae capax, inperitiae confessionem. quid a partibus uestris desideretur, agnoscis. interest famae tuae, ut quaesita nouerimus. utcumque absque detrimento cultus diuini in aliis sacerdotibus toleratur inscitia, at cum ad antistitem Augustinum uenitur, legi deest, quicquid contigerit ignorari. incolumem uenerationem tuam diuinitas summa tueatur, domine uere sancte ac merito uenerabilis pater.

### English translation (Claude)

While our conversation lingered on these things, one of the many said: "And who is there so imbued with wisdom, to the full perfection of Christianity, that he can open the doubtful points on which I am stuck and confirm my hesitant assent with a belief that is true or probable?" We were amazed and silent. Then he burst out of his own accord into these words: "I wonder whether the Lord and ruler of the world filled the body of an undefiled woman; whether the mother endured those long ten months of discomfort and yet, a virgin, gave birth with the usual solemnity of childbearing, and after this her virginity is thought to remain intact." To these he added other points: "He who is scarcely thought to be equaled by the whole universe lies hidden within the little body of a wailing infant; he endures the years of childhood, grows up, is strengthened in youth; for so long that ruler is absent from his seat, and the care of the whole world is transferred to one little body. Then he is overcome by sleep, nourished by food, feels all the affections of mortals, and by no fitting signs do the marks of so great a majesty shine out. That casting out of evil spirits, the healing of the sick, life restored to the dead: if you think of others too, these are small things for God." We interrupted him as he inquired further, broke up the gathering, and deferred the matter to the merits of better knowledge, lest, while secrets were rashly profaned, an innocent error should turn into fault. You have received, man capable of every glory, a confession of ignorance. You know what is desired from your side. It concerns your reputation that we should come to know what has been asked. Ignorance may somehow be tolerated in other priests without loss to divine worship; but when one comes to Bishop Augustine, whatever happens to be unknown to him is wanting to our religion. May the supreme Divinity keep Your Veneration safe, my truly holy lord and deservedly venerable father.

### Translation notes

- The objections concern the virginal conception and birth, how the ruler of the universe could be contained in an infant's body, and whether Christ's miracles were anything great for God (others, i.e. magicians, did as much). "Larualis illa purgatio" (the casting out of evil spirits) is translated by sense. "Legi deest" (literally "is lacking to the law") is taken of the Christian religion: what Augustine does not know, the faith cannot answer.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 135.2 (CSEL 44:91–93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/130-25/#p-135-2).

## Letter 136.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-1
- Source: CSEL 44:93–94
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Marcellinus writes to Augustine that Volusian has sent him questions on the incarnation, and asks him to answer the claim that Apollonius and Apuleius worked greater miracles than Christ.

### Latin text

Vir inlustris Volusianus beatitudinis tuae mihi litteras legit, immo me quidem cogente pluribus legit, quae, licet omnia, quae a te dicuntur, uere miranda sint, usque quaque miratus sum. sermonis enim diuini gratia humiliter tumens facile, ut placeret, emeruit. hinc enim plurimum placuit, quod hominis gressus aliquanto titubantes boni propositi exhortatione statuere et firmare contendis. est enim nobis cum eodem cotidiana pro uiribus nostris et pro ingenii paupertate disputatio, sanctae si quidem matris eius precatione compulsus cura mihi est eum frequentius salutandi, licet uicem in hac parte reddere etiam ipse dignatur. accepta autem uenerabilitatis tuae epistula homo, qui a uerae fidei stabilitate multorum, quorum in hac urbe copia est, persuasione reuocatur, ita motus est, ut, si, quantum ipse confirmat, litterarum prolixitatem minime formidasset, omne beatitudini tuae, quod habere potest, insinuasset ambiguum. sed tamen satis, sicut etiam ipse probare dignaberis, culto accuratoque sermone et Romanae eloquentiae nitore perspicuo aliqua sibi exolui impendio postulauit. quae quidem quaestio usque quaque detrita est et eorum super hac parte satis nota calliditas, qui dispensationem dominicae incarnationis infamant. sed tamen etiam ego in hac parte, quia plurimis, quicquid rescripseris, profuturum esse confido, precator accesserim, ut ad ea uigilantius respondere digneris, in quibus nihil amplius dominum, quam alii homines facere potuerunt, fecisse mentiuntur, Apollonium si quidem suum nobis et Apuleium aliosque magicae artis homines in medium proferunt, quorum maiora contendunt extitisse miracula.

### English translation (Claude)

The illustrious Volusian read me Your Blessedness's letter; indeed, at my urging, he read it to several people; and although everything you say is truly admirable, I admired it beyond measure. For with the grace of divine speech, humbly swelling, it easily earned approval. It pleased most of all in this, that you strive by the exhortation of a good purpose to steady and strengthen the man's somewhat stumbling steps. For I have daily discussion with him, as far as my strength and poverty of talent allow; since, urged by the prayer of his holy mother, I take care to call on him rather often, though he too deigns to return the visit on his side. Having received Your Reverence's letter, the man, who is drawn back from the stability of the true faith by the persuasion of many people, of whom there is an abundance in this city, was so moved that, if, as he himself affirms, he had not been much afraid of the length of a letter, he would have laid before Your Blessedness every doubt that he can have. Nevertheless, in language polished and careful enough, as you yourself will deign to judge, and with the clear brilliance of Roman eloquence, he has earnestly asked that certain points be resolved for him. This question has indeed been thoroughly worn out, and the cunning of those who defame the dispensation of the Lord's incarnation on this point is well known. Yet I too would come forward as a petitioner on this matter, since I am confident that whatever you write in reply will benefit very many, that you may deign to answer more carefully on the points where they falsely claim that the Lord did nothing more than other men have been able to do; for they bring forward their Apollonius and Apuleius and other men of the magical art, whose miracles they contend were greater.

### Translation notes

- Letter 136 is from Marcellinus to Augustine. Apollonius of Tyana (first-century wonder-worker) and Apuleius of Madaura were cited by pagans as rivals of Christ's miracles.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 136.1 (CSEL 44:93–94; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-1).

## Letter 136.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-2
- Source: CSEL 44:94–96
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Marcellinus reports Volusian's further objections: why God changed the sacrifices, and how Christ's teaching on non-retaliation can be compatible with the state, given the evils under Christian emperors.

### Latin text

Ipse autem uir inlustris superius memoratus multas esse dixit praesentibus aliquantis, quae huic possint iungi non inmerito, quaestiones, sicut ante dixi, si non ab eius partibus epistularis considerata breuitas fuisset. quae tamen licet scribere noluerit, tacere non passus est. dicebat enim, quod, etsi sibi hodie incarnationis dominicae ratio redderetur, reddi uix ad liquidum possit, cur hic deus, qui et ueteris testamenti deus esse firmatur, spretis ueteribus sacrificiis delectatus sit nouis. nihil enim corrigi posse adserebat, nisi quod ante factum non recte probaretur, uel, quod semel recte factum sit, inmutari nullatenus debuisse. recte enim facta dicebat mutari nisi iniuste non posse, maxime quia ista uanitas inconstantiae deum possit arguere, tum deinde quod eius praedicatio atque doctrina rei publicae moribus nulla ex parte conueniat, utpote sicuti a multis dicitur, cuius hoc constat esse praeceptum, ut nulli malum pro malo reddere debeamus et percutienti aliam praebere maxillam et pallium dare tunicam tollere persistenti et cum eo, qui nos angariare uoluerit, ire debere spatio itineris duplicato, quae omnia rei publicae moribus adserit esse contraria. nam quis tolli sibi ab hoste aliquid patiatur uel Romanae prouinciae depraedatori non mala uelit belli iure reponere? et cetera, quae dici ad reliqua posse intellegit uenerabilitas tua. haec ergo omnia ipsi posse iungi aestimat quaestioni in tantum, ut per Christianos principes Christianam religionem maxima ex parte seruantes tanta, etiam si ipse de hac parte taceat, rei publicae mala euenisse manifestum sit.

### English translation (Claude)

The illustrious man mentioned above said, in the presence of several people, that there are many questions which could not unfittingly be joined to this one, as I said before, if the brevity proper to a letter had not been considered on his part. Though he would not write them, he did not let them go unsaid. For he said that even if an account of the Lord's incarnation were given him today, it could hardly be given clearly why this God, who is also affirmed to be the God of the Old Testament, scorned the old sacrifices and was pleased with new ones. For he asserted that nothing can be corrected unless what was done before is shown not to have been done rightly, or that what was once done rightly ought by no means to have been changed. For he said that things rightly done cannot be changed except unjustly, especially because such fickleness might convict God of inconstancy. Then also that Christ's preaching and teaching are in no way compatible with the customs of the state, since, as many say, it is well known that his precept is that we should render evil for evil to no one, and offer the other cheek to one who strikes us, and give our cloak to one who persists in taking our tunic, and go twice the distance of the journey with one who wishes to press us into service; all of which he asserts are contrary to the customs of the state. For who would allow something to be taken from him by an enemy, or not wish to repay, by the law of war, evils to the plunderer of a Roman province? And other things which Your Reverence understands could be said in reply to the rest. All these things, then, he thinks can be joined to the question, all the more since it is evident (even if he himself is silent on this point) that such great evils have befallen the state under Christian emperors who for the most part observe the Christian religion.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:39: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:40: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:41: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:39–41; Rom 12:17. The objection about Christian emperors reflects pagan reaction after the sack of Rome (410).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 136.2 (CSEL 44:94–96; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-2).

## Letter 136.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-3
- Source: CSEL 44:96
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Marcellinus asks Augustine to answer these questions fully, in books that will serve the church, since a landowner of Hippo claimed he had found no satisfactory answer.

### Latin text

Unde, sicut beatitudo tua mecum dignatur agnoscere, ad haec omnia, quoniam multorum manibus sine dubio tradetur sanctitatis tuae desiderata responsio, plenus debet et elucubratus solutionis splendor ostendi, maxime quia, cum ista gererentur, eximius Hipponiensis regionis possessor et dominus praesens aderat, qui et sanctitatem tuam sub ironiae adulatione laudaret et sibi, cum de his quaereret, minime satis factum esse contenderet ego uero ad haec omnia promissionis non inmemor sed exactor libros confici deprecor ecclesiae hoc maxime tempore incredibiliter profuturos.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, as Your Blessedness deigns to recognize with me, since the reply we desire from Your Holiness will no doubt be passed through many hands, a full and carefully worked-out solution of brilliant clarity ought to be shown to all these points; especially because, while these things were going on, a distinguished landowner and lord of the region of Hippo was present, who praised Your Holiness with ironic flattery and maintained that he had by no means been satisfied when he inquired about these things. I, for my part, not forgetful of your promise but demanding its fulfilment, beg that books be written which will be of incredible benefit to the church, especially at this time.

### Translation notes

- The request for "books" led to Augustine's City of God, dedicated to Marcellinus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 136.3 (CSEL 44:96; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/136-1/#p-136-3).

## Letter 137.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-1
- Source: CSEL 44:96–98
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies promptly to Volusian, hoping that his talent will serve not only his own salvation but the defense of the faith before others.

### Latin text

Legi litteras tuas, in quibus uidi magni cuiusdam dialogi specimen laudabili breuitate comprehensum. respondere igitur debui nec pro dilatione aliquid excusationis opponere. accidit enim opportune, ut ab alienis negotiis mihi aliquantulum uacaret. quibus autem dictandis hoc otium statueram inpendere, paululum distuli nequaquam iustum esse arbitratus, ut, quem ad quaerendum exhortatus ipse fueram, differrem quaerentem. quis autem nostrum, qui Christi, ut possumus, gratiam ministramus, cum tua uerba legerit, ita te uelit doctrina instrui Christiana, ut tibi tantum sufficiat ad salutem non huius uitae, quam uaporis esse simillimam tantillum apparentis et ilico uanescentis atque pereuntis sermo diuinus admonere curauit, sed illam salutem, propter quam adipiscendam et in aeternum obtinendam Christiani sumus? parum est ergo nobis sic te instrui, ut tibi sit liberando satis. ingenium quippe et eloquium tuum tam excellens tamque luculentum prodesse debet etiam ceteris, contra quorum tarditatem seu peruersitatem conuenientissime defendenda est tantae gratiae dispensatio, quam superbae animulae nihili pendunt, quae nimis affectant plurimum posse et ad sua uitia sananda uel etiam frenanda nihil possunt.

### English translation (Claude)

I have read your letter, in which I saw the sample of a great dialogue contained with praiseworthy brevity. I ought, then, to reply, and not to put forward any excuse for delay. For it happened opportunely that I had a little leisure from other people's business. What I had decided to spend this leisure in dictating I have put off a little, thinking it by no means right that I should put off the inquirer whom I myself had urged to inquire. For which of us who, as best we can, minister the grace of Christ, on reading your words, would wish you to be instructed in Christian teaching only so far as is enough for your salvation, not in this life, which the divine word has taken care to warn us is very like a vapor appearing for a little while and then at once vanishing and perishing, but that salvation for the sake of which we are Christians, to attain it and hold it for ever? It is too little for us, then, that you be instructed so far as suffices for your being set free. For your talent and eloquence, so excellent and so brilliant, ought to benefit others also, against whose slowness or perversity the dispensation of so great a grace must most fittingly be defended, a grace which proud little souls count for nothing, souls that are too eager to have great power and have no power to heal or even restrain their own vices.

### Scripture references

- Jas 4:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 137 is Augustine's reply to Volusian. Jas 4:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.1 (CSEL 44:96–98; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-1).

## Letter 137.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-2
- Source: CSEL 44:98–99
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine restates Volusian's questions about the virgin birth, the incarnation, and Christ's miracles.

### Latin text

Quaeris igitur, utrum mundi dominus et rector intemeratae feminae corpus impleuerit, pertulerit decem mensium longa illa fastidia mater et tamen uirgo enixa sit sollemnitate pariendi et post haec uirginitas inuiolata permanserit; utrum intra corpusculum uagientis infantiae latuerit, cui par uix putatur uniuersitas, passus fuerit puerilitatis annos, adoleuerit, iuuentute solidatus sit; tam diu a sedibus suis afuerit ille regnator atque in unum corpusculum totius mundi cura translata sit; deinde in somnos resolutus sit, cibo alitus, omnes affectus mortalium senserit nec ullis competentibus signis claruerint tantae maiestatis indicia, quoniam larualis illa purgatio, debilium curae, reddita uita defunctis, si et alios cogitemus, deo parua sunt. hanc scribis in quodam conuentu amicorum ab uno ex multis, qui aderant, inlatam esse quaestionem, uos autem interuenisse ulterius inquirenti solutumque conuentum ad potioris peritiae merita distulisse, ne, dum incautius secreta temerantur, in culpam deflecteret error innocuus.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask, then, whether the Lord and ruler of the world filled the body of an undefiled woman; whether the mother endured those long ten months of discomfort and yet, a virgin, gave birth with the usual solemnity of childbearing, and after this her virginity remained inviolate; whether he who is scarcely thought equaled by the universe lay hidden within the little body of a wailing infant, endured the years of childhood, grew up, was strengthened in youth; whether that ruler was absent so long from his seat and the care of the whole world was transferred to one little body; then whether he was overcome by sleep, nourished by food, felt all the affections of mortals, and no fitting signs made the marks of so great a majesty shine out, since that casting out of evil spirits, the healing of the sick, life restored to the dead, if we think of others too, are small things for God. You write that this question was raised at a gathering of friends by one of the many who were present, but that you interrupted him as he inquired further, broke up the gathering, and deferred the matter to the merits of better knowledge, lest, while secrets were rashly profaned, an innocent error should turn into fault.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.2 (CSEL 44:98–99; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-2).

## Letter 137.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-3
- Source: CSEL 44:99–100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine disclaims the reputation of knowing everything: the depth of Scripture is such that even a lifetime's study leaves one only beginning.

### Latin text

Deinde ad me litterarum tuarum dirigis intentionem et post hanc inperitiae confessionem admones, ut, a partibus nostris quid desideretur, agnoscam. adiungis etiam interesse famae meae, ut quaesita noueritis, quod utcumque absque detrimento cultus diuini in aliis sacerdotibus toleratur inscitia, at cum ad me antistitem uenitur, legi deest, quicquid contigerit ignorari. primum igitur hanc de me opinionem facile praesumptam quaeso deponas eumque animum quamuis erga me beniuolentissimum soluas atque exuas ac de me mihi magis quam ulli alteri credas, si mihi dilectionis uicem reddis. tanta est enim Christianarum profunditas litterarum, ut in eis cotidie proficerem, si eas solas ab ineunte pueritia usque ad decrepitam senectutem maximo otio, summo studio, meliore ingenio conarer addiscere, non quo ad ea, quae necessaria sunt saluti, tanta in eis perueniatur difficultate, sed, cum quisque ibi fidem tenuerit, sine qua pie recteque non uiuitur, tam multa tamque multiplicibus mysteriorum umbraculis opacata intellegenda proficientibus restant tantaque non solum in uerbis, quibus ita dicta sunt, uerum etiam in rebus, quae intellegendae sunt, latet altitudo sapientiae, ut annosissimis, acutissimis, flagrantissimis cupiditate discendi hoc contingat, quod eadem scriptura quodam loco habet: Cum consummauerit homo, tunc incipit.

### English translation (Claude)

Then you direct the aim of your letter to me, and after this confession of ignorance you admonish me to recognize what is desired from my side. You add also that it concerns my reputation that you should come to know what was asked, since ignorance may somehow be tolerated in other priests without loss to divine worship, but when one comes to me as bishop, whatever happens to be unknown is wanting to our religion. First, then, I ask you to lay aside this opinion of me, so readily presumed, and to loosen and put off that state of mind, however most kindly disposed toward me, and to believe me about myself rather than anyone else, if you return my love. For such is the depth of the Christian Scriptures that I would make progress in them daily if I were trying to learn them alone from early boyhood to decrepit old age, with the greatest leisure, the utmost zeal, and a better talent. Not that one comes with such difficulty to what is necessary for salvation in them; but when someone has held fast there to the faith without which one does not live devoutly and rightly, so many things, shadowed by such manifold veils of mysteries, remain to be understood by those who advance, and so great a depth of wisdom lies hidden not only in the words in which they were spoken but also in the realities to be understood, that it happens to the oldest, the keenest, and those most burning with desire to learn, as that same Scripture says in one place: "When a man has finished, then he begins."

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 18:7 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sir 18:7 (18:6 in some numberings), in the Old Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.3 (CSEL 44:99–100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-3).

## Letter 137.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-4
- Source: CSEL 44:100–101
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christian teaching does not say that God left the government of the universe when he took flesh, for God is not a body but is whole everywhere and contained by no place.

### Latin text

Sed quid hinc plura? ueniendum ad rem potius, quam requiris. ubi primum scire te uolo non hoc Christianam habere doctrinam, quod ita sit deus infusus carni, qua ex uirgine nasceretur, ut curam gubernandae uniuersitatis uel deseruerit uel amiserit uel ad illud corpusculum quasi contractam collectamque transtulerit. hominum iste sensus est nihil nisi corpora ualentium cogitare siue ista crassiora, sicut sunt humor atque humus, siue subtiliora sicut aeris et lucis, sed tamen corpora, quorum nullum potest esse ubique totum, quoniam per innumerabiles partes aliud alibi habeat necesse est et, quantumcumque sit corpus seu quantulumcumque corpusculum, loci occupet spatium eundemque locum sic impleat, ut in nulla eius parte sit totum. ac per hoc densari atque rarescere, contrahi et dilatari, in minutias deteri et grandescere in molem non nisi corporum est. longe aliud est animae natura quam corporis; quanto magis dei, qui creator est et animae et corporis! non sic deus implere dicitur mundum uelut aqua, uelut aer, uelut ipsa lux, ut minore sui parte minorem mundi partem impleat et maiore maiorem. nouit ubique totus esse et nullo contineri loco; nouit uenire non recedendo, ubi erat; nouit abire non deserendo, quo uenerat.

### English translation (Claude)

But why say more of this? We must come rather to the matter you ask about. Here first I want you to know that Christian teaching does not hold that God was so poured into the flesh in which he was to be born of the virgin that he either abandoned or lost the care of governing the universe, or transferred it, as if contracted and gathered up, to that little body. That is the notion of people who can think of nothing but bodies, whether the grosser ones, such as water and earth, or the finer, such as air and light, but bodies nonetheless; none of which can be whole everywhere, since through innumerable parts it must have one part in one place and another in another, and however great a body or however small a little body it may be, it occupies a space and so fills that place that it is not whole in any part of it. And so to be condensed and rarefied, contracted and expanded, ground into tiny pieces and enlarged into a mass belongs only to bodies. The nature of the soul is far other than that of the body; how much more that of God, who is the creator of both soul and body! God is not said to fill the world as water does, as air does, as light itself does, so that he fills a smaller part of the world with a smaller part of himself and a larger with a larger. He knows how to be whole everywhere and to be contained in no place; he knows how to come without departing from where he was; he knows how to go away without abandoning the place to which he had come.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.4 (CSEL 44:100–101; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-4).

## Letter 137.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-5
- Source: CSEL 44:101–103
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The mind should first wonder at itself: in sight and hearing the soul perceives things far outside the flesh in which alone it lives.

### Latin text

Miratur hoc mens humana et, quia non capit, fortasse nec credit. se ipsam primitus scrutata miretur, se ipsam paululum, si potest, a corpore attollat et ab eis rebus, quas solet sentire per corpus, et uideat ipsa, quid sit, quae utitur corpore. sed forte non potest; magni quippe ingenii est, ut ait quidam, seuocare mentem a sensibus et cogitationem a consuetudine abducere. ipsos ergo corporis sensus aliquanto insuetius et uigilantius perscrutetur. sunt certe quinquepartiti corporis sensus, qui nec sine corpore nec sine anima esse possunt, quia neque sentire est nisi uiuentis, quod ab anima est corpori, neque sine corporeis instrumentis et quasi uasis atque organis uidemus, audimus ceterisque tribus utimur sensibus. intendat haec anima rationalis et sensus corporis non sensibus corporis sed ipsa mente atque ratione consideret. certe sentire homo non potest, nisi uiuat; uiuit autem in carne, antequam morte utrumque dirimatur. quo modo igitur anima, quae sunt extra carnem suam, sentit, quae non nisi in carne sua uiuit? an non ab eius carne longissime absunt sidera in caelo? an in caelo non uidet solem? an sentire non est uidere, cum sit in quinque sensibus excellentior ceteris uisus? an et in caelo uiuit, quia et in caelo sentit et sensus esse non potest, ubi uita non est? an sentit, et ubi non uiuit, quia, cum in sua tantum carne uiuat, sentit etiam in his locis, quae praeter eius carnem continent ea, quae tangit aspectu? uidesne, quam sit hoc latebrosum in sensu tam conspicuo, qui uisus dicitur? adtende et auditum. nam et ipse se foras quodam modo diffundit a carne. unde enim dicimus: Foris sonat, nisi ibi sentiamus, ubi sonat? ergo et illic extra carnem nostram uiuimus. an sentire possumus, et ubi non uiuimus, cum sensus sine uita esse non possit?

### English translation (Claude)

The human mind wonders at this, and because it does not grasp it, perhaps it does not believe it either. Let it first examine itself and wonder at itself; let it raise itself a little, if it can, from the body and from the things it usually perceives through the body, and see what it is itself, that uses the body. But perhaps it cannot; for it takes a great mind, as someone says, to call the mind away from the senses and to draw thought away from habit. Let it, then, examine the bodily senses themselves somewhat more unusually and attentively. There are certainly five bodily senses, which cannot exist either without a body or without a soul, since perceiving belongs only to a living thing, and the body has life from the soul; nor do we see, hear, or use the other three senses without bodily instruments, as it were vessels and organs. Let the rational soul attend to these things and consider the bodily senses not with the bodily senses but with the mind and reason itself. Certainly a person cannot perceive unless he lives; and he lives in the flesh until death separates the two. How then does the soul, which lives only in its own flesh, perceive things that are outside its flesh? Are not the stars in the sky very far from its flesh? Does it not see the sun in the sky? Is seeing not perceiving, since sight excels the others among the five senses? Does it then live in the sky too, since it perceives in the sky also, and perception cannot exist where there is no life? Or does it perceive even where it does not live, since, though it lives only in its own flesh, it perceives also in those places, outside its flesh, which contain the things it touches with its gaze? Do you see how obscure this is in so conspicuous a sense as the one called sight? Consider hearing too. For it also in a way pours itself out from the flesh. Why else do we say, "It sounds outside," unless we perceive there, where it sounds? So there too we live outside our flesh. Or can we perceive even where we do not live, though perception cannot exist without life?

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 1.38 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- "As someone says": Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 1.16.38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.5 (CSEL 44:101–103; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-5).

## Letter 137.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-6
- Source: CSEL 44:103–105
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If the soul's perception is so wonderful, it should not be incredible that the Word took a body without losing his immortality, eternity, power, or government of the world.

### Latin text

Ceteri tres sensus apud se ipsos sentiunt, quamuis de olfactu possit utcumque dubitari. de gustu autem atque tactu nulla controuersia est, quod ea, quae gustamus et tangimus, non alibi quam in nostra carne sentimus. proinde isti tres sensus ab hac consideratione semoueantur. uisus auditusque adferunt mirabilem quaestionem, aut quo modo anima sentiat, ubi non uiuit, aut quo modo uiuat, ubi non est. neque enim nisi in carne sua est; sentit autem etiam praeter carnem suam. ibi quippe sentit, ubi uidet, quia et uidere sentire est; ibi sentit, ubi audit, quia et audire sentire est. aut ergo et ibi uiuit ac per hoc etiam ibi est aut sentit, et ubi non uiuit, aut uiuit, et ubi non est. haec omnia mira sunt; nihil horum adfirmari sine quadam uelut absurditate potest et de sensu loquimur morticino. quid igitur est ipsa anima praeter corporis sensum, id est in mente, qua ista considerat? neque enim sensu corporis de ipsis sensibus corporis iudicat. et putamus nobis de omnipotentia dei incredibile aliquid dici, cum dicitur uerbum dei, per quod facta sunt omnia, sit adsumpsisse corpus ex uirgine et sensibus apparuisse mortalibus, ut inmortalitatem suam non corruperit, ut aeternitatem non mutauerit, ut potestatem non minuerit, ut administrationem mundi non deseruerit, ut a sinu patris, id est a secreto, quo cum illo et in illo est, non recesserit!

### English translation (Claude)

The other three senses perceive within themselves, though there might be some doubt about smell. About taste and touch there is no dispute, since what we taste and touch we perceive nowhere but in our flesh. Let these three senses therefore be set aside from this consideration. Sight and hearing raise an astonishing question: either how the soul perceives where it does not live, or how it lives where it is not. For it is nowhere but in its flesh; yet it perceives even outside its flesh. For it perceives where it sees, since seeing too is perceiving; it perceives where it hears, since hearing too is perceiving. Either, then, it lives there too, and so is there too; or it perceives even where it does not live; or it lives even where it is not. All these things are wonderful; none of them can be affirmed without some apparent absurdity; and we are speaking of a perishable sense. What then is the soul itself beyond the bodily sense, that is, in the mind with which it considers these things? For it does not judge the bodily senses themselves by a bodily sense. And do we think something incredible is said to us about God's omnipotence when it is said that the Word of God, through whom all things were made, took a body from the virgin and appeared to the senses of mortals in such a way that he did not corrupt his immortality, did not change his eternity, did not diminish his power, did not abandon the government of the world, did not withdraw from the bosom of the Father, that is, from the secret place where he is with him and in him!

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:3, 18. "Morticino" ("of dead flesh") is rendered "perishable".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.6 (CSEL 44:103–105; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-6).

## Letter 137.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-7
- Source: CSEL 44:105–106
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As a spoken word is heard whole by every hearer, so the abiding Word of God is whole everywhere, coming when manifested and departing when hidden.

### Latin text

Verbum dei sic intellege, per quod facta sunt omnia, non ut eius transire aliquid cogites et ex futuro praeteritum fieri. manet, sicuti est, et ubique totum est. uenit autem, cum manifestatur, et, cum occultatur, abscedit. adest tamen siue occultum siue manifestum, sicut lux adest oculis et uidentis et caeci; sed uidenti adest praesens caeco uero absens. adest et uox audientibus auribus, adest etiam surdis; sed illis patet, istis latet. quid autem mirabilius quam id, quod accidit in uocibus nostris uerbisque sonantibus in re scilicet raptim transitoria? cum enim loquimur, ne secundae quidem syllabae locus est, nisi prima sonare destiterit, et tamen, si unus adsit auditor, totum audit, quod dicimus, et, si duo adsint, tantundem ambo audiunt, quod et singulis totum est, et, si audiat multitudo silens, non inter se particulatim comminuunt sonos tamquam cibos, sed omne, quod sonat, et omnibus totum est et singulis totum. itane iam non illud est potius incredibile, si, uerbum hominis transiens quod exhibet auribus, uerbum dei permanens non exhibet rebus, ut, quem ad modum hoc simul auditur etiam a singulis totum, ita illud simul ubique sit totum?

### English translation (Claude)

Understand the Word of God, through whom all things were made, in such a way that you do not think anything of him passes away, or that what was future becomes past. He remains as he is, and he is whole everywhere. He comes, however, when he is made manifest, and departs when he is hidden. Yet he is present whether hidden or manifest, as light is present to the eyes both of one who sees and of one who is blind; but to one who sees it is present as present, to the blind as absent. A voice too is present to ears that hear, and present also to the deaf; but to the former it is open, to the latter hidden. What is more wonderful than what happens in our voices and spoken words, a thing that passes away so swiftly? For when we speak, there is no room even for the second syllable unless the first has ceased to sound; and yet, if one hearer is present, he hears the whole of what we say, and if two are present, both hear just as much, and it is whole to each of them; and if a silent multitude listens, they do not divide the sounds among themselves piecemeal like food, but all that sounds is whole to all and whole to each. Is it not, then, rather incredible if the abiding Word of God does not do for things what the passing word of a human being does for ears: that just as the latter is heard at the same time whole even by each one, so the former should be at the same time whole everywhere?

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.7 (CSEL 44:105–106; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-7).

## Letter 137.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-8
- Source: CSEL 44:106–107
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is great in power, not size; his power made the virgin fruitful, united a whole man to himself, and brought Christ forth through the inviolate womb as later through closed doors.

### Latin text

Non itaque metuendum est corpusculum infantiae, ne in illo tantus deus angustias passus esse uideatur. neque enim mole sed uirtute magnus est deus, qui prouidentiae similiorem sensum magis formiculis et apiculis dedit quam asinis et camelis, qui ex grano minutissimo seminis tantam ficulneae arboris magnitudinem creat, cum ex multo maioribus seminibus longe minora multa nascantur, qui pupulam tam paruam ditauit acie, qua per oculos emicante in ictu temporis caelum prope dimidium lustraretur, qui ex puncto et quasi centro cerebri sensus omnes quinaria distributione diffundit, qui corde, membro tam exiguo, uitalem motum per corporis cuncta dispensat his atque huius modi rebus insinuans magna de minimis, qui non est paruus in paruis. ipsa enim magnitudo uirtutis eius, quae nullas in angusto sentit angustias, uterum uirginalem non aduenticio sed indigena puerperio fecundauit; ipsa sibi animam rationalem et per eandem etiam corpus humanum totumque omnino hominem in melius mutandum nullo modo in deterius mutata coaptauit nomen humanitatis ab eo dignanter adsumens, diuinitatis ei largiter tribuens; ipsa uirtus per inuiolata matris uirginea uiscera membra infantis eduxit, quae postea per clausa ostia membra iuuenis introduxit. hic si ratio quaeritur, non erit mirabile; si exemplum poscitur, non erit singulare. demus deum aliquid posse, quod nos fateamur inuestigare non posse. in talibus rebus tota ratio facti est potentia facientis.

### English translation (Claude)

There is no need, then, to fear the little body of the infant, as though so great a God might seem to have suffered confinement in it. For God is great not in bulk but in power: he who gave to little ants and bees a sense more like foresight than to asses and camels; who creates the great size of the fig tree from the tiniest grain of seed, while many far smaller plants spring from much larger seeds; who enriched the little pupil of the eye with so keen a sight that, flashing out through the eyes, it surveys almost half the sky in an instant; who from a point, as it were the center of the brain, spreads out all the senses in a fivefold distribution; who by the heart, so small an organ, distributes the vital motion through all parts of the body. By these and such things he suggests great things through the least, he who is not small in small things. For this very greatness of his power, which feels no confinement in a narrow space, made the virgin's womb fruitful with a birth not brought in from outside but native to it; this power joined to itself a rational soul and through it also a human body, and the whole man, to be changed for the better, while it was in no way changed for the worse, graciously taking from him the name of humanity and generously giving him that of divinity. The same power brought forth the infant's limbs through the inviolate virginal womb of his mother, which afterward brought in the young man's limbs through closed doors. If a reason is sought here, it will not be wonderful; if an example is demanded, it will not be unique. Let us grant that God can do something that we confess we cannot investigate. In such matters the whole reason for the deed is the power of the doer.

### Scripture references

- John 20:19: allusion, high confidence
- John 20:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 20:19, 26 (closed doors). The birth "through the inviolate womb" states the doctrine of Mary's virginity in childbirth; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.8 (CSEL 44:106–107; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-8).

## Letter 137.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-9
- Source: CSEL 44:107–109
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's sleeping, eating, and human feelings show he was truly man, against heretics who denied his human nature; he joined both natures in one person.

### Latin text

Iam illud, quod in somnos soluitur et cibo alitur et omnes humanos sentit affectus, hominem persuadet hominibus, quem non consumpsit utique, sed adsumpsit. ecce sic factum est et tamen quidam haeretici peruerse mirando eius laudandoque uirtutem naturam humanam in eo prorsus agnoscere noluerunt, ubi est omnis gratiae commendatio, qua saluos facit credentes in se profundos thesauros sapientiae et scientiae continens et fide inbuens mentes, quas ad aeternam contemplationem ueritatis incommutabilis peruehat. quid, si omnipotens hominem ubicumque formatum non ex materno utero crearet, sed repentinum inferret aspectibus? quid, si nullas ex paruulo in iuuentam mutaret aetates, nullos cibos, nullos caperet somnos? nonne opinionem confirmaret erroris nec hominem uerum suscepisse ullo modo crederetur et, dum omnia mirabiliter facit, auferret, quod misericorditer fecit? nunc uero ita inter deum et homines mediator apparuit, ut in unitate personae copulans utramque naturam et solita sublimaret insolitis et insolita solitis temperaret.

### English translation (Claude)

Next, the fact that he was overcome by sleep and nourished by food and felt all human affections convinces human beings that he was a man, whom he certainly did not consume but assumed. See, so it was done, and yet certain heretics, perversely admiring and praising his power, refused altogether to acknowledge human nature in him, in which lies the whole commendation of the grace by which he saves those who believe in him, containing deep treasures of wisdom and knowledge, and imbuing with faith the minds he brings to the eternal contemplation of unchangeable truth. What if the Almighty had created a man formed somewhere else, not from a mother's womb, but brought him suddenly before people's eyes? What if he had passed through no ages from infancy to youth, and taken no food and no sleep? Would he not have confirmed that erroneous opinion, and would it not have been believed that he had by no means taken a true man, and, while doing everything wonderfully, would he not have taken away what he did mercifully? But now he appeared as mediator between God and men in such a way that, joining both natures in the unity of one person, he both raised the ordinary by the extraordinary and tempered the extraordinary by the ordinary.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:3: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:3; 1 Tim 2:5. The heretics meant are those who denied Christ's real humanity (e.g. Manichaeans and other docetists).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.9 (CSEL 44:107–109; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-9).

## Letter 137.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-10
- Source: CSEL 44:109
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As God works wonders daily in seeds and nature, he made a man for himself without seed, taking flesh in time without being changed into flesh.

### Latin text

Quid autem non mirum deus facit in omnibus creaturae motibus, nisi consuetudine cotidiana uiluissent? denique quam multa usitata calcantur, quae considerata stupentur! sicut ipsa uis seminum quos numeros habet, quam uiuaces, quam efficaces, quam latenter potentes, quam in paruo magna molientes, quis adeat animo, quis promat eloquio? ille igitur sibi sine semine operatus est hominem, qui in rerum natura sine seminibus operatur et semina; ille in suo corpore numeros temporum mensurasque seruauit aetatum, qui sine ulla sui mutabilitate mutando contexit ordinem saeculorum. hoc enim creuit in tempore, quod coepit ex tempore; uerbum autem in principio, per quod facta sunt tempora, tempus elegit, quo susciperet carnem, non tempori cessit, ut uerteretur in carnem; homo quippe deo accessit. non deus a se recessit.

### English translation (Claude)

But what does God not do that is wonderful in all the movements of creation, had they not grown cheap through daily habit? How many common things are trampled underfoot which, when considered, astonish us! Take the very power of seeds: what numbers it has, how living, how effective, how secretly powerful, how great the things it accomplishes in a small space: who can reach it with the mind, who can express it in speech? He, then, wrought a man for himself without seed, who in the nature of things works even seeds without seeds; he kept in his own body the numbers of times and the measures of ages, who without any change in himself weaves together by change the order of the ages. For what began in time grew in time; but the Word in the beginning, through whom times were made, chose the time in which to take flesh, and did not yield to time so as to be turned into flesh. For man came to God; God did not depart from himself.

### Scripture references

- John 1:1: allusion, medium confidence
- John 1:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:1–3, 14 (allusion).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.10 (CSEL 44:109; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-10).

## Letter 137.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-11
- Source: CSEL 44:109–111
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As soul and body form one human person, so God and man form the one person of Christ; the union of two incorporeal realities, the Word and a soul, is easier to believe than that of soul and body.

### Latin text

Sic autem quidam reddi sibi rationem flagitant, quo modo deus homini permixtus sit, ut una fieret persona Christi, cum hoc semel fieri oportuerit, quasi rationem ipsi reddant de re, quae cotidie fit, quo modo misceatur anima corpori, ut una persona fiat hominis. nam sicut in unitate personae anima utitur corpore, ut homo sit, ita in unitate personae deus utitur homine, ut Christus sit. in illa ergo persona mixtura est animae et corporis, in hac persona mixtura est dei et hominis, si tamen recedat auditor a consuetudine corporum, qua solent duo liquores ita misceri, ut neutrum seruet integritatem suam, quamquam et in ipsis corporibus aeri lux incorrupta misceatur. ergo persona hominis mixtura est animae et corporis, persona autem Christi mixtura est dei et hominis; cum enim uerbum dei permixtum est animae habenti corpus, simul et animam suscepit et corpus. illud cotidie fit ad procreandos homines, hoc semel factum est ad liberandos homines. uerum tamen duarum rerum incorporearum commixtio facilius credi debuit quam unius incorporeae et alterius corporeae. nam si anima in sua natura non fallatur, incorpoream se esse comprehendit; multo magis incorporeum est uerbum dei ac per hoc uerbi dei et animae credibilior debuit esse permixtio quam animae et corporis. sed hoc in nobis ipsis experimur, illud in Christo credere iubemur. si autem utrumque nobis pariter inexpertum credendum praeciperetur, quid horum citius crederemus? quo modo non fateremur duo incorporea quam unum incorporeum alterumque corporeum facilius potuisse misceri, si tamen non indigne ad ista mixtionis uel mixturae nomen admittitur propter consuetudinem corporalium rerum longe aliter se habentium aliterque natarum?

### English translation (Claude)

Some people, however, demand to be given an account of how God was mingled with man so as to become the one person of Christ, when this had to happen only once, as if they themselves could give an account of something that happens daily, how the soul is mingled with the body so as to become the one person of a human being. For just as in the unity of a person the soul uses a body so that there is a man, so in the unity of a person God uses a man so that there is Christ. In the one person, then, there is a mingling of soul and body; in this person there is a mingling of God and man; provided, however, that the hearer withdraws from the habit of thinking in terms of bodies, by which two liquids are usually so mixed that neither keeps its integrity, although even among bodies light is mixed with air without being corrupted. So the person of a man is a mingling of soul and body, but the person of Christ is a mingling of God and man; for when the Word of God was mingled with a soul having a body, he took at once both the soul and the body. The one happens daily for the begetting of human beings; the other happened once for the setting free of human beings. And yet the mingling of two incorporeal things ought to have been more easily believed than that of one incorporeal and the other corporeal. For if the soul is not deceived about its own nature, it understands itself to be incorporeal; much more incorporeal is the Word of God; and so a mingling of the Word of God and a soul ought to have been more credible than that of a soul and a body. But the latter we experience in ourselves; the former we are commanded to believe in Christ. If, however, both were equally unknown to our experience and we were commanded to believe them, which of these would we believe more readily? How would we not admit that two incorporeal things could have been mingled more easily than one incorporeal and one corporeal, if indeed the word "mixing" or "mingling" is not unfittingly admitted for these things, given our habit of thinking of bodily things, which are of a very different condition and a very different origin?

### Translation notes

- Augustine uses "mixtura" (mingling) of the union of natures, while warning against taking it as a physical mixture in which neither keeps its integrity; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.11 (CSEL 44:109–111; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-11).

## Letter 137.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-12
- Source: CSEL 44:111–114
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The eternal Word took a man and became one Christ, equal to the Father in divinity and less in humanity, bringing teaching that confirms what is true and the help of grace to overcome sin.

### Latin text

Verbum igitur dei idemque dei filius patri coaeternus eademque uirtus et sapientia dei a superno fine creaturae rationalis usque ad infimum finem creaturae corporalis adtingens fortiter et disponens omnia suauiter praesens et latens nusquam conclusa, nusquam discissa, nusquam tumida sed sine mole ubique tota longe alio modo quodam quam eo, quo creaturis ceteris adest, suscepit hominem seque et illo fecit unum Iesum Christum, mediatorem dei et hominum, aequalem patri secundum diuinitatem minorem autem patre secundum carnem, hoc est secundum hominem, incommutabiliter inmortalem secundum aequalem patri diuinitatem eundemque mutabilem atque mortalem secundum cognatam nobis infirmitatem, in quo Christo eo tempore, quod opportunissimum ipse nouerat et ante saecula disposuerat, uenit hominibus magisterium et adiutorium ad capessendam sempiternam salutem: magisterium quidem, ut ea, quae hic ante dicta sunt utiliter uera non solum a prophetis sanctis, qui omnia uera dixerunt, uerum etiam a philosophis atque ipsis poetis et cuiusce modi auctoribus litterarum, quos multa uera falsis miscuisse quis ambigat, illius etiam in carne praesentata confirmaret auctoritas propter eos, qui illa non possent in ipsa intima ueritate cernere atque discernere, quae ueritas, et antequam hominem adsumeret, ipse erat omnibus, qui eius participes esse potuerunt, maxime uero suae incarnationis exemplo id salubriter persuasit, ut, quoniam homines plerique diuinitatis auidi per potestates caelestes, quas deos putarent, ritusque uarios inlicitorum non sacrorum sed sacrilegiorum ambiendum sibi arbitrarentur ad deum magis superbe quam pie, qua in re pro angelis sanctis eis se daemones superbiae cognatione supponunt, scirent homines tam proximum esse deum pietati hominum, ad quem uelut longe positum per interpositas potestates ambiebant, ut hominem suscipere dignaretur et cum illo uniri quodam modo, ut ei sic coaptaretur homo totus, quem ad modum animae corpus excepta concretione mutabili, in quam non conuertitur deus et quam uidemus quod habeat et corpus et anima; adiutorium autem, quod sine gratia fidei, quae ab illo est, nemo potest uincere concupiscentias uitiosas et, si qua earum residua non uicerit, ueniali remissione purgari. quod ergo ad magisterium eius adtinet, quis nunc extremus idiota uel quae abiecta muliercula non credit animae inmortalitatem uitamque post mortem futuram? quod apud Graecos olim primus Pherecydes Syrius cum disputauisset, Pythagoram Samium disputationis illius nouitate permotum ex athleta in philosophum uertit. nunc ergo, quod Maro ait et omnes uidemus, amomum Assyrium uulgo nascitur. quod autem ad adiutorium gratiae pertinet, quae in Christo est, ipse est omnino, quo duce, si qua manent sceleris uestigia nostri, inrita perpetua soluent formidine terras.

### English translation (Claude)

The Word of God, then, who is also the Son of God, coeternal with the Father, the same power and wisdom of God, reaching mightily from the highest limit of rational creation to the lowest limit of bodily creation and ordering all things sweetly, present and hidden, nowhere enclosed, nowhere divided, nowhere swollen, but without bulk whole everywhere, in a way far different from that in which he is present to other creatures, took a man and made himself and that man one Jesus Christ, the mediator between God and men: equal to the Father according to his divinity, but less than the Father according to the flesh, that is, according to the man; unchangeably immortal according to the divinity equal to the Father, and the same changeable and mortal according to the weakness akin to ours. In this Christ, at the time which he knew to be most fitting and had arranged before the ages, there came to human beings teaching and help for laying hold of everlasting salvation. Teaching: so that the things usefully and truly said here before, not only by the holy prophets, who said all things truly, but also by philosophers and the poets themselves and authors of every kind of literature (who would doubt that they mixed many truths with falsehoods?), might be confirmed by the authority of him present even in the flesh, for the sake of those who could not see and distinguish them in the inmost truth itself; and that truth he himself was, even before he took a man, to all who were able to share in him. But above all by the example of his incarnation he persuaded human beings, for their salvation, of this: since many people, eager for divinity, thought they must make their way to God through heavenly powers whom they took to be gods, and through various rites, not of lawful sacred worship but of sacrilege, more proudly than devoutly (and in this matter demons, by kinship in pride, put themselves forward to them in place of the holy angels), people were to know that God, to whom they sought to make their way as though he were far off, through intermediary powers, is so near to the devotion of human beings that he deigned to take a man and to be united with him in such a way that the whole man was joined to him as the body is to the soul, except for the changeable concretion, into which God is not turned, and which we see that both body and soul have. Help: because without the grace of faith, which is from him, no one can overcome vicious desires and be cleansed by pardoning remission from whatever remnants of them he has not overcome. As regards his teaching, then, what utter simpleton now, or what lowly little woman, does not believe in the immortality of the soul and a life to come after death? When Pherecydes the Syrian first argued this long ago among the Greeks, the novelty of that argument so moved Pythagoras of Samos that it turned him from an athlete into a philosopher. Now, then, as Maro says and we all see, "Assyrian amomum springs up everywhere." And as regards the help of the grace that is in Christ, he is wholly the one under whose leadership, "if any traces of our crime remain, made void, they will free the lands from perpetual fear."

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:24: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:28: echo, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence
- Pherecydes of Syros, Pherecydes (Pherecydes of Syros (fragments)): allusion, low confidence
- Virgil, Ecl. 4.25 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence
- Virgil, Ecl. 4.13–14 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wisdom 8:1; 1 Cor 1:24; 1 Tim 2:5. Pherecydes of Syros as Pythagoras's teacher is traditional (the story that he turned an athlete into a philosopher is Augustine's report). Virgil, Eclogue 4.25 and 4.13–14 (Augustine applies the messianic Eclogue to Christ). The phrase "excepta concretione mutabili" (except the changeable concretion) is obscure in the Latin and is translated literally. Statements on the two natures are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.12 (CSEL 44:111–114; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-12).

## Letter 137.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-13
- Source: CSEL 44:114–116
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The prophets also worked miracles, and Moses defeated the magicians; but Christ, foretold by the prophets as Lord, did things uniquely his own: virgin birth, resurrection, and ascension.

### Latin text

Sed nulla, inquiunt, competentibus signis tantae maiestatis indicia claruerunt, quia larualis illa purgatio, debilium curae, reddita uita defunctis, si et alii considerentur, deo parua sunt fatemur quidem et nos talia quaedam fecisse prophetas. nam in his signis quid est excellentius quam mortuos reuixisse? fecit hoc Helias, fecit hoc Helisaeus; nam de magorum miraculis, utrum etiam mortuos suscitauerint, illi uiderint, qui et Apuleium se contra magicarum artium crimina copiosissime defendentem conantur non accusando sed laudando conuincere. nos legimus magos Aegyptiorum istarum artium peritissimos a Moyse, famulo dei, fuisse superatos, cum illi quaedam mira nefandis artibus agerent, ille deo simpliciter inuocato cuncta eorum machinamenta subuerteret. sed et ipse Moyses et ceteri prophetae ueracissimi dominum Christum prophetauerunt et ei gloriam magnam dederunt, hunc non tamquam parem sibi nec in eadem miraculorum potentia superiorem sed plane dominum deum omnium et hominem propter homines factum uenturum praenuntiauerunt. qui propterea et ipse talia facere uoluit, ne esset absurdum, qui per illos fecerat, si ipse non faceret. sed tamen et aliquid proprium facere debuit, nasci de uirgine, a mortuis resurgere, in caelum ascendere. hoc deo qui parum putat, quid plus expectet, ignoro.

### English translation (Claude)

"But," they say, "no fitting signs made the marks of so great a majesty shine out, since that casting out of evil spirits, the healing of the sick, life restored to the dead, if others are considered too, are small things for God." We too admit that the prophets did some such things. For among these signs what is more excellent than the dead coming back to life? Elijah did this; Elisha did this. As for the miracles of magicians, whether they also raised the dead, let those see to it who are trying to convict Apuleius, who defends himself very fully against the charge of magical arts, not by accusing him but by praising him. We read that the magicians of the Egyptians, most skilled in these arts, were overcome by Moses, the servant of God, when they did certain wonders by wicked arts and he, simply calling on God, overturned all their devices. But Moses himself and the other most truthful prophets prophesied the Lord Christ and gave him great glory, and foretold that he would come, not as their equal, nor as superior in the same power of miracles, but plainly as the Lord God of all, and made man for the sake of men. He therefore willed to do such things himself also, lest it be absurd that he should not do himself what he had done through them. Yet he also had to do something of his own: to be born of a virgin, to rise from the dead, to ascend into heaven. Whoever thinks this too little for God, I do not know what more he expects.

### Scripture references

- 1 Kgs 17:22: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Kgs 4:35: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 8:18: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Apuleius, Apology (Apuleius): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Kgs 17:17–24 (3 Kgdms LXX); 2 Kgs 4:32–37 (4 Kgdms LXX); Exod 7–8. Apuleius's Apology is his defense against a charge of magic; Augustine says pagans praise him as a wonder-worker despite his own denial.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.13 (CSEL 44:114–116; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-13).

## Letter 137.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-14
- Source: CSEL 44:116–117
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Unbelievers despise lesser miracles because others performed them and reject Christ's unique works because no one else did them; Augustine urges Volusian not to be like them.

### Latin text

Arbitror enim talia flagitari, qualia gerens hominem facere debuit. nam in principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum et omnia per ipsum facta sunt. num homine adsumpto alium mundum facere debuit, ut eum esse crederemus, per quem factus est mundus? sed nec maior mundus nec isti aequalis in hoc mundo fieri posset. si autem minorem faceret infra istum, similiter hoc quoque parum putaretur. quia ergo non oportebat, ut nouum faceret mundum, noua fecit in mundo. homo enim de uirgine procreatus et a mortuis in aeternam uitam resuscitatus et super caelos exaltatus potentius opus est fortasse quam mundus. hic forte respondent se factum hoc esse non credere. quid ergo fiat hominibus, qui minora contemnunt, maiora non credunt? reddita uita defunctis ideo creditur, quia fecerunt alii, et parum est deo; caro propria de uirgine creata et a morte in aeternam uitam super caelum leuata ideo non creditur, quia nemo fecit, et competit deo. ac per hoc, quae sibi quisque facilia non factu sed captu putat, aequo animo accipit, supra ea ueluti ficta pro falsis ducit. noli eis esse similis, obsecro te.

### English translation (Claude)

For I think they are demanding such things as he ought to have done while bearing a man. "For in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and all things were made through him." Ought he, having taken a man, to have made another world, so that we might believe him to be the one through whom the world was made? But neither a greater world nor one equal to this could be made in this world. And if he made a lesser one, beneath this one, this too would likewise be thought too little. Since, then, it was not fitting that he should make a new world, he made new things in the world. For a man born of a virgin, raised from the dead to eternal life, and exalted above the heavens is perhaps a mightier work than the world. Here perhaps they reply that they do not believe this was done. What, then, is to be done with people who despise the lesser things and do not believe the greater? Life restored to the dead is believed because others have done it, and it is too little for God; his own flesh created from a virgin and raised from death to eternal life above the heavens is not believed because no one has done it, and it is what befits God. And so each one accepts calmly what he thinks easy, not to do but to grasp, and regards what is beyond these as fictions and holds them false. Do not be like them, I beg you.

### Scripture references

- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 3.2 (Sallust): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:1, 3. The last sentence echoes Sallust, Catiline 3.2 ("quae sibi quisque facilia factu putat..."), adapted ("not to do but to grasp").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.14 (CSEL 44:116–117; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-14).

## Letter 137.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-15
- Source: CSEL 44:117–119
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The order of history from Abraham through Israel's story, foretelling Christ in all its promises and rites, should move the mind to believe.

### Latin text

Disputantur haec latius et omnes quaestionum necessariarum sinus perscrutati discussique panduntur. sed intellectui fides aditum aperit, infidelitas claudit. quem non moueat ad credendum tantus ab initio ipse rerum ordo gestarum et ipsa conexio temporum praeteritis fidem de praesentibus faciens, priora posterioribus et recentioribus antiqua confirmans? eligitur unus ex gente Chaldaeorum pietate fidelissima praeditus, cui promissa diuina post tantam seriem saeculorum nouissimis temporibus complenda prodantur, atque in eius semine omnes gentes habiturae benedictionem praenuntiantur. sic unum deum uerum colens uniuersitatis creatorem gignit filium senex de coniuge, quam spe pariendi penitus destitutam sterilitas aetasque iam fecerat. propagatur ex illo numerosissimus populus, multiplicatus in Aegypto, quo illam stirpem ex orientalibus partibus promissis effectisque crebrescens dispositio diuina transmiserat. educitur ex Aegypti seruitute gens ualida horrendis signis atque miraculis pulsisque impiis gentibus in terram promissionis perducta et constituta regno etiam sublimatur. deinde praeualescente peccato sacrilegis ausibus deum uerum, qui ei beneficia tanta contulerat, saepissime offendens uariisque flagellata cladibus et prosperitatibus consolata usque ad Christi incarnationem declarationemque perducitur. quem Christum, dei uerbum, dei filium, deum in carne uenturum, moriturum, resurrecturum, in caelum ascensurum, praepollentissimo suo nomine in omnibus gentibus dicatos sibi populos habiturum inque illo peccatorum remissionem salutemque aeternam futuram esse credentibus omnia gentis illius promissa, omnes prophetiae, sacerdotia, sacrificia, templum et cuncta omnino sacramenta sonuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

These matters are discussed more widely, and all the recesses of the necessary questions are explored, examined, and laid open. But faith opens the way to understanding; unbelief closes it. Whom would not the very order of events from the beginning, so great as it is, move to believe, and the very connection of the ages, which gives credibility to the present from the past and confirms the earlier by the later and the ancient by the more recent? One man from the nation of the Chaldeans is chosen, endowed with most faithful piety, to whom divine promises are revealed, to be fulfilled in the last times after so long a series of ages, and it is foretold that in his seed all nations will receive blessing. So, worshiping the one true God, creator of the universe, he begets a son in his old age from a wife whom barrenness and age had already made wholly without hope of bearing. From him is propagated a most numerous people, multiplied in Egypt, to which the divine plan, growing ever clearer through promises and their fulfilment, had brought that stock from the eastern regions. A strong nation is led out of slavery in Egypt with dreadful signs and miracles, and when the ungodly nations had been driven out it is brought into the land of promise, settled there, and even exalted to a kingdom. Then, as sin prevailed, offending most often by sacrilegious acts the true God who had conferred such benefits on it, chastised by various disasters and consoled by times of prosperity, it is brought on to the incarnation and manifestation of Christ. All the promises of that nation, all its prophecies, priesthoods, sacrifices, temple, and absolutely all its sacraments proclaimed this Christ: that he, the Word of God, the Son of God, God, would come in the flesh, would die, would rise again, would ascend into heaven, would have peoples dedicated to him by his most mighty name among all nations, and that in him there would be remission of sins and eternal salvation for those who believe.

### Scripture references

- Gen 12:1: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 21:2: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 1:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 12:1–3; 22:18; Gen 21:1–7; Exodus; Joshua. The digital text's "dum" before "tantus" seems to be a slip and is removed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.15 (CSEL 44:117–119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-15).

## Letter 137.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-16
- Source: CSEL 44:119–121
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The coming of Christ, Pentecost, the spread of the church through persecution, the fall of the temple, the dispersion of the Jews carrying the Scriptures, and the rise of heresies all fulfil prophecy.

### Latin text

Venit et Christus, complentur in eius ortu, uita, factis, dictis, passionibus, morte, resurrectione, ascensione omnia praeconia prophetarum. mittit spiritum sanctum, implet fideles una in domo congregatos et hoc ipsum promissum orando ac desiderando expectantes. impleti autem sancto spiritu loquuntur repente linguis omnium gentium, arguunt fidenter errores, praedicant saluberrimam ueritatem, exhortantur ad paenitentiam praeteritae culpabilis uitae, indulgentiam de diuina gratia pollicentur. praedicationem pietatis ueraeque religionis signa congruentia et miracula consequuntur. excitatur aduersus eos saeua infidelitas, tolerant praedicta, sperant promissa, docent praecepta. numero exigui per mundum disseminantur, populos mirabili facilitate conuertunt, inter inimicos augentur, persecutionibus crescunt, per afflictionum angustias usque in terrarum extrema dilatantur. ex inperitissimis, ex abiectissimis, ex paucissimis inluminantur, nobilitantur, multiplicantur. praeclarissima ingenia, cultissima eloquia mirabilesque peritias acutorum, facundorum atque doctorum subiugant Christo et ad praedicandam uiam pietatis salutisque conuertunt. alternis aduersitatibus et prosperitatibus rerum patientiam et temperantiam uigilanter exercent, mundo declinante in extrema fessisque rebus aetatem ultimam protestante multo fidentius, quia et hoc praedictum est, aeternam felicitatem caelestis ciuitatis expectant. atque inter haec omnia contra ecclesiam Christi impiarum gentium infidelitas fremit, euincit illa patiendo et inconcussam fidem inter obsistentium saeuitiam profitendo. reuelatae ueritatis, quae diu promissis mysticis uelabatur, sacrificio succedente illa sacrificia, quibus hoc figurabatur, templi ipsius euersione tolluntur. reproba per infidelitatem gens ipsa Iudaeorum a sedibus extirpata per mundum usquequaque dispergitur, ut ubique portet codices sanctos ac sic prophetiae testimonium, qua Christus et ecclesia praenuntiata est, ne ad tempus a nobis fictum existimaretur, ab ipsis aduersariis proferatur, ubi etiam ipsos praedictum est non fuisse credituros. templa et simulacra daemonum ritusque sacrilegi paulatim atque alternatim secundum praedicta prophetica subuertuntur. haereses aduersus nomen Christi sub uelamento tamen nominis Christi ad exercendam doctrinam sanctae religionis, sicut praenuntiatae sunt, pullulant. haec omnia sicut leguntur praedicta, ita cernuntur impleta atque ex his iam tot et tantis, quae restant, expectantur implenda. quae tandem mens auida aeternitatis uitaeque praesentis breuitate permota contra huius diuinae auctoritatis lumen culmenque contendat?

### English translation (Claude)

Christ came too, and in his birth, life, deeds, sayings, sufferings, death, resurrection, and ascension all the proclamations of the prophets are fulfilled. He sends the Holy Spirit; he fills the faithful gathered in one house, awaiting this very promise with prayer and desire. Filled with the Holy Spirit, they suddenly speak in the languages of all nations, boldly refute errors, preach the most wholesome truth, exhort to repentance for a former guilty life, and promise pardon from divine grace. Fitting signs and miracles follow the preaching of piety and true religion. Savage unbelief is stirred up against them; they endure what was foretold, hope for what was promised, teach what was commanded. Few in number, they are scattered throughout the world, convert peoples with wonderful ease, increase among enemies, grow by persecutions, and through the straits of afflictions spread to the ends of the earth. From the most unlearned, the most despised, the fewest, they become enlightened, ennobled, multiplied. They bring under Christ the most brilliant talents, the most cultivated eloquence, and the wonderful skill of the keen, the eloquent, and the learned, and turn them to preaching the way of piety and salvation. Through alternating adversity and prosperity they watchfully exercise patience and temperance; and as the world declines to its end and by its exhaustion testifies that it is in its last age, they await the eternal happiness of the heavenly city with much more confidence, since this too was foretold. And amid all these things the unbelief of the ungodly nations rages against the church of Christ; she overcomes by suffering and by professing an unshaken faith amid the savagery of her opponents. As the sacrifice of the revealed truth, which had long been veiled by mystical promises, succeeds, those sacrifices by which it was prefigured are removed by the overthrow of the temple itself. The very nation of the Jews, rejected for its unbelief, is uprooted from its homeland and dispersed everywhere throughout the world, so that it carries the holy books everywhere, and thus the testimony of prophecy, by which Christ and the church were foretold, is produced by our very adversaries, lest it be thought to have been invented by us for the occasion; and in that prophecy it was also foretold that they themselves would not believe. The temples and images of demons and the sacrilegious rites are overthrown little by little and by turns, according to the prophetic predictions. Heresies against the name of Christ, yet under the veil of the name of Christ, spring up as they were foretold, to exercise the teaching of holy religion. All these things, as they are read to have been foretold, so they are seen to be fulfilled; and from these, so many and so great, the rest that remain are awaited to be fulfilled. What mind, then, eager for eternity and moved by the shortness of the present life, would contend against the light and height of this divine authority?

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:14: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 2:4: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 16:20: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 2:1–13. Augustine's view that the Jews, dispersed, carry the Scriptures as witnesses to the prophecies about Christ is translated as written; it is his recurring argument, not the translator's.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.16 (CSEL 44:119–121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-16).

## Letter 137.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-17
- Source: CSEL 44:121–122
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The two great commandments contain physics, ethics, logic, and the true well-being of the state, surpassing all philosophy and law.

### Latin text

Quae disputationes, quae litterae quorumlibet philosophorum, quae leges quarumlibet ciuitatum duobus praeceptis, ex quibus Christus dicit totam legem prophetasque pendere, ullo modo sunt comparandae? Diliges dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et ex tota mente tua et diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. hic physica, quoniam omnes omnium naturarum causae in deo creatore sunt; hic ethica: quoniam uita bona et honesta non aliunde formatur, quam cum ea, quae diligenda sunt, quem ad modum diligenda sunt, diliguntur, hoc est deus et proximus; hic logica, quoniam ueritas lumenque animae rationalis nonnisi deus est; hic etiam laudabilis rei publicae salus, neque enim conditur et custoditur optima ciuitas nisi fundamento et uinculo fidei firmaeque concordiae, cum bonum commune diligitur, quod summum ac uerissimum deus est, atque in illo inuicem sincerissime se homines diligunt, cum propter illum se diligunt, cui, quo animo diligant, occultare non possunt.

### English translation (Claude)

What disputations, what writings of any philosophers, what laws of any states can in any way be compared with the two commandments on which Christ says the whole law and the prophets depend? "You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind, and you shall love your neighbor as yourself." Here is physics, since all the causes of all natures are in God the creator; here is ethics, since a good and honorable life is formed in no other way than when the things that are to be loved are loved as they are to be loved, that is, God and neighbor; here is logic, since the truth and light of the rational soul is none but God; here too is the praiseworthy well-being of the state, for the best state is not founded and preserved except on the foundation and bond of faith and firm concord, when the common good is loved, which is God, the highest and truest good, and in him people love one another most sincerely, when they love one another for the sake of him from whom they cannot hide the spirit in which they love.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:39: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 22:37–40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.17 (CSEL 44:121–122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-17).

## Letter 137.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-18
- Source: CSEL 44:122–123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture's style is lowly and accessible yet profound, feeding all with plain truth and exercising them with hidden truth.

### Latin text

Modus autem ipse dicendi, quo sancta scriptura contexitur, quam omnibus accessibilis, quamuis paucissimis penetrabilis! ea, quae aperta continet, quasi amicus familiaris sine fuco ad cor loquitur indoctorum atque doctorum; ea uero, quae in mysteriis occultat, nec ipsa eloquio superbo erigit, quo non audeat accedere mens tardiuscula et inerudita quasi pauper ad diuitem, sed inuitat omnes humili sermone, quos non solum manifesta pascat, sed etiam secreta exerceat ueritate hoc in promptis quod in reconditis habens. sed ne aperta fastidirentur, eadem rursus operta desiderantur, desiderata quodam modo renouantur, renouata suauiter intimantur. his salubriter et praua corriguntur et parua nutriuntur et magna oblectantur ingenia. ille huic doctrinae inimicus est animus, qui uel errando eam nescit esse saluberrimam uel odit aegrotando medicinam.

### English translation (Claude)

And the very manner of speaking in which holy Scripture is woven, how accessible it is to all, though penetrable by very few! What it contains openly it speaks, like a familiar friend, without pretense to the heart of the unlearned and the learned; what it hides in mysteries it does not raise up in proud eloquence, which a slow and uneducated mind would not dare approach, like a poor man approaching a rich one, but it invites all by lowly speech, to feed them not only with the plain truth but also to exercise them with the hidden, having in the obvious what it has in the obscure. But lest the plain things should be despised, the same things, hidden again, are desired; once desired, they are in a way renewed; once renewed, they are sweetly impressed. By these, perverse minds are healthfully corrected, small minds nourished, and great minds delighted. That mind is hostile to this teaching which either, by erring, does not know that it is most wholesome, or, being sick, hates the medicine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.18 (CSEL 44:122–123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-18).

## Letter 137.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-19
- Source: CSEL 44:123–124
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine invites Volusian to write at length with any further questions, as the apostles and their expositors did.

### Latin text

Vides, quam prolixam epistulam fecerim. si quid ergo te mouet atque inter nos pertractari tanti habes, non tibi faciat angustias usitatarum epistularum uelut custodiendus modus, quia et optime nosti, quam grandes eas ueteres habuerint, cum aliquid agerent, quod explicare breuiter non ualerent. et si auctorum ad alias litteras pertinentium mos esset alius, nostrorum nobis in hac re dignius imitanda praeberetur auctoritas. inspice itaque modum epistularum apostolicarum uel eorum etiam, qui illa diuina eloquia tractauerunt, et non te pigeat uel multa quaerenda proponere, si multa permouent, uel aliquanto diutius uersare, quod quaeris, ut, quantum fieri per tales, quales sumus, potest, non remaneat dubitationis nubilum, quod obstet lumini ueritatis.

### English translation (Claude)

You see what a long letter I have written. If, then, anything troubles you and you think it worth discussing between us, do not let the customary length of ordinary letters cramp you, as if it were a limit to be kept; for you know very well how long the ancients made their letters when they were dealing with something they could not explain briefly. And even if the custom of authors of other literature were different, the authority of our own authors would be offered to us as more worthy of imitation in this matter. Look, then, at the length of the apostolic letters, or of those who have expounded those divine words, and do not hesitate either to put forward many questions, if many trouble you, or to turn over what you ask somewhat longer, so that, as far as can be done by people such as we are, no cloud of doubt may remain to obstruct the light of truth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.19 (CSEL 44:123–124; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-19).

## Letter 137.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-20
- Source: CSEL 44:124–126
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers those who say Christianity harms the state: they want impunity for vice, but God's grace sustains the faithful in adversity and prosperity until the heavenly city.

### Latin text

Scio enim excellentiam tuam quorundam perpeti obstinatissimas contradictiones, qui propterea putant uel putari uolunt Christianam doctrinam utilitati non conuenire rei publicae, quia nolunt stare rem publicam firmitate uirtutum sed impunitate uitiorum. non autem sicut regi homini uel cuilibet principi ciuitatis ita etiam deo, quicquid a multis peccatur, inultum est. misericordia uero eius et gratia praedicata hominibus per hominem Christum impertita autem per deum deique filium eundem ipsum Christum non deserit eos, qui ex eius fide uiuunt eumque pie colunt, siue mala huius uitae patienter fortiterque experiantur siue bonis eius misericorditer ac temperanter utantur, aeternum pro utroque praemium recepturi in ciuitate superna atque diuina, ubi iam non sit moleste toleranda calamitas nec laboriose frenanda cupiditas sed sola sine ulla difficultate et cum perfecta libertate retinenda dei et proximi caritas. incolumem felicioremque te misericordissima dei omnipotentia tueatur, domine inlustris et merito insignis ac praestantissime fili. sanctam et in Christo dignissime honorandam matrem, cuius pro te preces deus exaudiat, pro meritis uestris officiosissime saluto. sanctus frater et coepiscopus meus Possidius praestantiam uestram multum salutat.

### English translation (Claude)

For I know that Your Excellency endures the most obstinate contradictions of certain people who think, or wish it to be thought, that Christian teaching is not compatible with the welfare of the state, because they want the state to stand not by the firmness of virtues but by the impunity of vices. But it is not with God as with a human king or any ruler of a city, that whatever sins many commit go unpunished. His mercy and grace, however, preached to human beings through the man Christ, but bestowed through God, the Son of God, the same Christ, do not abandon those who live by faith in him and worship him devoutly, whether they endure the evils of this life patiently and bravely or use its goods mercifully and temperately; they will receive an eternal reward for both in the city above, the divine city, where calamity need no longer be borne with distress nor desire curbed with labor, but only the love of God and neighbor kept without any difficulty and with perfect freedom. May the most merciful omnipotence of God keep you safe and ever happier, my illustrious lord, deservedly distinguished and most excellent son. I greet most respectfully, as your merits deserve, your holy mother, most worthy of honor in Christ, whose prayers for you may God hear. My holy brother and fellow bishop Possidius sends many greetings to Your Excellence.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:17: echo, low confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Hab 2:4 / Rom 1:17 (echo: "live by faith"); 1 Tim 2:5 ("the man Christ").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 137.20 (CSEL 44:124–126; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/137-1/#p-137-20).

## Letter 138.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-1
- Source: CSEL 44:126–127
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Marcellinus to answer the further objections he reported, so that the letter may be read to the objectors.

### Latin text

Inlustri uiro et eloquentissimo nobisque dilectissimo Volusiano non amplius quam ad illud, quod inquirendum putauit, respondendum fuit. ad ea uero, quae mihi pertractanda atque soluenda in epistula tua ipse misisti, siue ab illo siue etiam ab aliis uel suggerantur uel ingerantur, ad te potius pro uiribus nostris pertractata et soluta mitti debuerunt non sic, quem ad modum de his agendum est librorum negotio, sed quem ad modum potis est epistulari sat esse conloquio, ut, si tibi uisum fuerit, qui eorum motus cotidianis disputationibus experiris, et illis legantur hae litterae. at si auriculis eorum minus fidei pietate praecultis sermo iste non sufficit, prius inter nos, quod eis putas sufficere, peragatur, tum demum ad illos, quod peractum fuerit, perferatur. multa enim sunt, a quibus sensus eorum si adhuc abhorret et resilit, uel uberiore uel subtiliore ratione uel certe auctoritate, cui resistere indignum putent, persuaderi aliquando forsitan possit.

### English translation (Claude)

To the illustrious and most eloquent Volusian, most dear to us, I had to reply to no more than what he thought fit to ask. But the points that you yourself sent me in your letter to be discussed and resolved, whether they are suggested or pressed upon you by him or by others too, ought rather to be sent to you, discussed and resolved as far as my strength allows: not in the way these things must be treated in the business of books, but in the way that can suffice for conversation by letter; so that, if you think fit, since you experience their objections in daily discussions, this letter may be read to them also. But if this discourse is not enough for their ears, which have not yet been prepared by the piety of faith, let what you think will suffice for them be first worked out between us, and then at last let what has been worked out be carried to them. For there are many things from which, if their minds still shrink and recoil, they may perhaps someday be persuaded by a fuller or subtler reasoning, or at least by an authority which they would think it unworthy to resist.

### Translation notes

- Letter 138 is to Marcellinus, answering the objections reported in Letter 136.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.1 (CSEL 44:126–127; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-1).

## Letter 138.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-2
- Source: CSEL 44:127–128
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the objection that God changed the sacrifices: nature and human arts change their practice with the times while their underlying reason stays the same.

### Latin text

Ergo in epistula tua posuisti moueri quosdam, cur hic deus, qui et ueteris testamenti deus esse firmatur, spretis ueteribus sacrificiis delectatus sit nouis. nihil enim corrigi posse adserunt, nisi quod ante non recte factum probaretur, uel, quod semel recte factum sit, inmutari nullatenus debuisse. recte enim facta dicunt mutari nisi iniuste non posse. haec uerba ex litteris tuis in has meas transtuli. quibus si respondere copiose uelim, tempus me citius quam exempla defecerint, quibus rerum ipsa natura et opera humana certa ratione pro temporum opportunitate mutentur nec tamen eadem ratio sit mutabilis, qua ista mutantur. unde pauca commemorem, ut ex his excitata quodam modo iam per plura similia uigil currat intentio. nonne hiemi aestas addito sensim calore succedit? nonne diurnis tempora nocturna uertuntur? quotiens nostrae uariantur aetates! adulescentiae pueritia non reditura cedit, iuuentus adulescentiae non mansura succedit, finiens iuuentutem senectus morte finitur. haec omnia mutantur nec mutatur diuinae prouidentiae ratio, qua fit, ut ista mutentur. non autem, opinor, cum agricola aestate aliud iusserit, quam iusserat hieme, ratio mutatur agriculturae. et cum mane surgit, qui nocte quiescebat, uitae consilium non mutauit. aliud magister adulescenti, quam puero solebat, inposuit; doctrina igitur constans mutato praecepto non mutata mutauit.

### English translation (Claude)

In your letter, then, you stated that some are troubled as to why this God, who is also affirmed to be the God of the Old Testament, scorned the old sacrifices and was pleased with new ones. For they assert that nothing can be corrected unless what was done before is shown not to have been done rightly, or that what was once done rightly ought by no means to have been changed. For they say that things rightly done cannot be changed except unjustly. These words I have transferred from your letter into mine. If I wished to answer them at length, time would fail me sooner than examples by which the very nature of things and human works are changed by sure reason according to the suitability of the times, while the reason by which they are changed is not itself changeable. So I will mention a few, so that the mind, roused by these, may run alertly through many similar ones. Does not summer succeed winter as heat is gradually added? Are not the times of night turned into those of day? How often our ages vary! Childhood yields to adolescence, never to return; youth succeeds adolescence, not to remain; old age, ending youth, is ended by death. All these things change, yet the reason of divine providence by which they change does not change. Nor, I think, when a farmer orders one thing in summer and another in winter, does the reason of agriculture change. And when one who was resting at night rises in the morning, he has not changed his plan of life. A teacher imposes one thing on a young man and another on a boy; so the teaching, constant, changed the precept and was not itself changed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.2 (CSEL 44:127–128; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-2).

## Letter 138.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-3
- Source: CSEL 44:128–129
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The physician Vindicianus showed that the same remedy may help at one age and harm at another, though the art of medicine stays the same.

### Latin text

Magnus ille nostrorum temporum medicus Vindicianus consultus a quodam dolori eius adhiberi iussit, quod in tempore congruere uidebatur; adhibitum sanitas consecuta est. deinde post aliquot annos eadem rursus corporis causa commota hoc idem ille putauit adhibendum; uertit in peius. miratus recurrit ad medicum, indicat factum; at ille, ut erat acerrimus, ita respondit: Ideo male acceptus es, quia non ego iussi, ut omnes, qui audissent parumque hominem nossent, non eum arte medicinali fidere sed nescio qua inlicita potentia putarent. unde cum esset a quibus poterat stupentibus interrogatus, aperuit, quod non intellexerant, uidelicet illi iam aetati non hoc se fuisse iussurum. tantum igitur ualet ratione atque artibus non mutatis, quid secundum eas sit pro temporum uarietate mutandum.

### English translation (Claude)

The great physician of our times, Vindicianus, was consulted by someone and ordered a remedy to be applied to his pain that seemed suitable at the time; it was applied, and health followed. Then some years later, when the same bodily complaint arose again, the man thought this same remedy should be applied; it turned out worse. Astonished, he ran back to the physician and told him what had happened. And he, being very sharp, replied: "It did you harm because I did not prescribe it"; so that all who heard and did not know the man well thought that he trusted not in the art of medicine but in some unlawful power. So when he was asked by those who could, in their astonishment, he explained what they had not understood: that he would not have prescribed this for that age. So much depends, while reason and the arts do not change, on what according to them must be changed for the variety of times.

### Translation notes

- Vindicianus was a celebrated physician and proconsul of Africa whom Augustine knew (Confessions 4.3.5). The digital text's "[deo" is read as "Ideo" ("therefore").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.3 (CSEL 44:128–129; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-3).

## Letter 138.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-4
- Source: CSEL 44:129
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: What was rightly done may rightly be changed when times change, as what is allowed to one person may not be allowed to another.

### Latin text

Non itaque uerum est, quod dicitur, semel recte factum nullatenus esse mutandum. mutata quippe temporis causa, quod recte ante factum fuerat, ita mutari uera ratio plerumque flagitat, ut, cum ipsi dicant recte non fieri, si mutetur, contra ueritas clamet recte non fieri, nisi mutetur, quia utrumque tunc erit rectum, si erit pro temporum diuersitate diuersum. quod enim in diuersitate personarum uno tempore accidere potest, ut huic liceat aliquid impune facere, illi non liceat, non quod dissimilis res sit, sed quod is, qui facit, ita ab una eademque persona diuersis temporibus tunc oportet aliquid fieri, tunc non oportet, non quod sui dissimilis sit, qui facit, sed quando facit.

### English translation (Claude)

It is not true, then, as is said, that what has once been done rightly must by no means be changed. For when the circumstances of the time change, true reason often demands that what had been rightly done before be changed in such a way that, while they say it is not rightly done if it is changed, truth on the contrary cries out that it is not rightly done unless it is changed; for both will then be right, if they are different according to the difference of the times. For what can happen at one time with different persons, that one may do something with impunity and another may not, not because the thing is different but because the doer is, so with one and the same person at different times something ought to be done at one time and not at another, not because the doer is different from himself, but because the time when he does it is.

### Translation notes

- The Latin of the last sentence is elliptical; the sense is supplied ("because the doer is" ... "because the time ... is").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.4 (CSEL 44:129; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-4).

## Letter 138.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-5
- Source: CSEL 44:129–130
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God, who knows what fits each time, commanded one sacrifice for the early times and another for now, so that history unfolds like a great song of an ineffable composer.

### Latin text

Haec quaestio quam late pateat, profecta uidet, quisquis pulchri aptique distantiam sparsam quodam modo in uniuersitate rerum ualet neque neglegit intueri. pulchrum enim per se ipsum consideratur atque laudatur, cui turpe ac deforme contrarium est. aptum uero, cui ex aduerso est ineptum, quasi religatum pendet aliunde nec ex semet ipso sed ex eo, cui conectitur, iudicatur; nimirum etiam decens atque indecens uel hoc idem est uel perinde habetur. age nunc ea, quae diximus, refer ad illud, unde agitur. aptum fuit primis temporibus sacrificium, quod praeceperat deus, nunc uero non ita est. aliud enim praecepit, quod huic tempori aptum esset, qui multo magis quam homo nouit, quid cuique tempori accommodate adhibeatur, quid quando impertiat, addat, auferat, detrahat, augeat minuatue inmutabilis mutabilium sicut creator ita moderator, donec uniuersi saeculi pulchritudo, cuius particulae sunt, quae suis quibusque temporibus apta sunt, uelut magnum carmen cuiusdam ineffabilis modulatoris excurrat atque inde transeant in aeternam contemplationem speciei, qui deum rite colunt, etiam cum tempus est fidei.

### English translation (Claude)

How widely this question extends is surely seen by anyone who can and does not neglect to observe the distinction between the beautiful and the fitting, scattered as it were through the whole universe of things. For the beautiful is considered and praised in itself, and its opposite is the base and the ugly. But the fitting, whose opposite is the unfitting, hangs as if tied to something else, and is judged not from itself but from what it is connected with; and no doubt the becoming and the unbecoming are either the same as this or regarded as such. Now refer what we have said to the matter in question. The sacrifice which God had commanded was fitting in the first times, but now it is not so. For he commanded another, fitting for this time, he who knows far better than man what is suitably applied to each time, what he should impart, add, take away, withdraw, increase, or diminish, and when: the unchangeable ruler, as he is creator, of changeable things, until the beauty of the whole course of the ages, whose small parts are the things fitting to their several times, runs out like a great song of some ineffable composer, and from there those who worship God rightly, even while it is the time of faith, pass over into the eternal contemplation of his form.

### Translation notes

- The distinction between the beautiful (pulchrum) and the fitting (aptum) was the subject of Augustine's early lost work De pulchro et apto (Confessions 4.13).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.5 (CSEL 44:129–130; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-5).

## Letter 138.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-6
- Source: CSEL 44:130–131
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God commands sacrifices not for his own benefit but for ours; they are signs of his gifts, and the Psalm says God has no need of our goods.

### Latin text

Falluntur autem, qui existimant haec deum iubere causa suae utilitatis uel uoluptatis et merito mouentur, cur deus ista mutauerit quasi delectatione mutabili aliud sibi iubens offerri illo prius tempore aliud isto. non autem ita est. nihil deus iubet, quod sibi prosit sed illi, cui iubet. ideo uerus est dominus, qui seruo non indiget et quo seruus indiget, in ea quippe scriptura, quod uetus dicitur testamentum et eo tempore dictum est, quo adhuc illa offerebantur sacrificia, quae hoc tempore non offeruntur: Dixi domino: Dominus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges. nec illorum ergo sacrificiorum egebat deus nec cuiusquam eget umquam, sed rerum diuinitus impertitarum uel inbuendo uirtutibus animo uel aeternae saluti adipiscendae quaedam signa sunt, quorum celebratione atque functione non deo sed nobis utilia pietatis exercentur officia.

### English translation (Claude)

But those are mistaken who think that God commands these things for his own benefit or pleasure, and they are rightly troubled as to why God changed them, as if with a changeable delight he ordered one thing to be offered to him at that earlier time and another at this. But it is not so. God commands nothing that benefits himself, but only the one to whom he gives the command. That is why he is the true Lord: he does not need a servant, and the servant needs him. Indeed, in the Scripture called the Old Testament, and spoken at the time when those sacrifices which are not offered at this time were still being offered, it says: "I said to the Lord: You are my Lord, since you have no need of my goods." God, then, did not need those sacrifices, nor does he ever need anyone's; but they are signs of things divinely bestowed, either for imbuing the mind with virtues or for attaining eternal salvation; by their celebration and performance the duties of piety are exercised, useful not to God but to us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 16:2 (15:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 16:2 (15:2 LXX), in the Old Latin wording.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.6 (CSEL 44:130–131; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-6).

## Letter 138.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-7
- Source: CSEL 44:131–132
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The change from Old to New Testament sacraments shows no change in God; it was foretold by the Psalms and by Jeremiah's promise of a new covenant.

### Latin text

Nimis autem longum est conuenienter disputare de uarietate signorum, quae cum ad res diuinas pertinent, sacramenta appellantur. sicut autem non ideo mutabilis deus, quia mane aliud aliud uespere, illud hoc mense illud alio, non hoc isto anno quod illo, ita non ideo mutabilis deus, quia uniuersi saeculi priore uolumine aliud aliud posteriore sibi iussit offerri, quo conuenienter significationes ad doctrinam religionis saluberrimam pertinentes per mutabilia tempora sine ulla sui mutatione disponeret. nam ut nouerint, quos haec mouent, iam hoc fuisse in ratione diuina nec, cum ista noua constituerentur, subito priora displicuisse uelut mutabili uoluntate, sed iam hoc fixum et statutum fuisse in ipsa sapientia dei, cui de maioribus etiam rerum mutationibus eadem scriptura dicit: Mutabis ea et mutabuntur, tu autem idem ipse es, insinuandum est eis mutationem istam sacramentorum testamenti ueteris et noui etiam praedictam fuisse propheticis uocibus. ita enim uidebunt, si poterunt, id, quod in tempore nouum est, non esse nouum apud eum, qui condidit tempora et sine tempore habet omnia, quae suis quibusque temporibus pro eorum uarietate distribuit. nam et in illo psalmo, unde commemoraui aliquid, quo demonstrarem non egere deum sacrificiis nostris, cui dicitur: Dixi domino: Dominus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges, paulo post legitur ex persona Christi: Non congregabo conuenticula eorum de sanguinibus, hoc est pecorum uictimis, quibus prius congregabantur conuenticula Iudaeorum; et alibi dicit: Non accipiam de domo tua uitulos neque de gregibus tuis hircos; et alius propheta: Ecce dies, inquit, uenient, dicit dominus, et confirmabo super domum Iacob testamentum nouum non sicut testamentum, quod disposui patribus eorum, cum eduxi eos de terra Aegypti. et alia multa sunt de hac re testimonia, quibus hoc deum facturum esse praedictum est, quae commemorare nunc longum est.

### English translation (Claude)

It would take too long to discuss fittingly the variety of signs, which, when they concern divine things, are called sacraments. But just as God is not changeable because he commands one thing in the morning and another in the evening, this in one month and that in another, not in this year what he commanded in that, so God is not changeable because in the earlier volume of the whole course of the ages he commanded one thing to be offered to him and another in the later, so that he might fittingly arrange, without any change in himself, through changeable times, the significations belonging to the most wholesome teaching of religion. For in order that those who are troubled by these things may know that this was already in the divine plan, and that when these new things were established the earlier did not suddenly displease him as by a changeable will, but that this had already been fixed and decreed in the very wisdom of God, to whom the same Scripture says, concerning even greater changes of things, "You will change them and they will be changed, but you are the same," it must be impressed upon them that this change of the sacraments of the Old and New Testament was also foretold by prophetic voices. For so they will see, if they can, that what is new in time is not new with him who established the times and has without time all things which he distributes to their several times according to their variety. For in that psalm from which I quoted something to show that God does not need our sacrifices, in which he is told, "I said to the Lord: You are my Lord, since you have no need of my goods," a little later we read in the person of Christ: "I will not gather their assemblies from blood," that is, from the sacrifices of cattle, by which the assemblies of the Jews were formerly gathered; and elsewhere he says: "I will not take calves from your house, nor goats from your flocks"; and another prophet says: "Behold, the days will come, says the Lord, and I will establish over the house of Jacob a new covenant, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers when I brought them out of the land of Egypt." And there are many other testimonies on this matter in which it was foretold that God would do this, which it would take long to mention now.

### Scripture references

- Ps 102:26 (101:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 102:27 (101:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:2 (15:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:9 (49:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jer 31:31 (38:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jer 31:32 (38:32 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 102:26–27 (101:27–28 LXX); Ps 16:2, 4 (15:2, 4 LXX); Ps 50:9 (49:9 LXX); Jer 31:31–32 (38:31–32 LXX), all in the Old Latin wording.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.7 (CSEL 44:131–132; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-7).

## Letter 138.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-8
- Source: CSEL 44:132–133
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ had to be foretold by one set of sacraments before his coming and proclaimed by another after it, just as different tenses suit different times.

### Latin text

Hic iam si satis constitit, quod recte alio tempore constitutum est, itidem recte alio tempore posse mutari mutantis opere non dispositione mutata, quam dispositionem intellegibilis ratio continet, ubi sine tempore simul sunt, quae in temporibus simul fieri non possunt, quia tempora non simul currunt, quispiam fortassis expectet causas a nobis ipsius mutationis accipere, quod ipse nosti quam prolixi negotii sit. uerum tamen breuiter dici potest, quod homini acuto fortassis suffecerit, aliis sacramentis praenuntiari Christum, cum uenturus esset, aliis, cum uenisset, adnuntiari oportuisse, sicut modo nos id ipsum loquentes diuersitas rerum compulit etiam uerba mutare, si quidem aliud est praenuntiari aliud adnuntiari, aliud cum uenturus esset aliud cum uenisset.

### English translation (Claude)

If it is now sufficiently established that what was rightly instituted at one time can likewise be rightly changed at another, the work of the one who changes it being changed but not his plan (that plan is contained by intelligible reason, where things that cannot happen at the same time in times exist together without time, since times do not run together), someone may perhaps expect to receive from us the causes of the change itself, which you yourself know to be a lengthy business. Yet it can be said briefly, which may perhaps suffice for a keen mind, that Christ had to be foretold by some sacraments when he was going to come, and announced by others when he had come; just as now, in speaking of this very thing, the difference of the matters has compelled us also to change words, since "to be foretold" is one thing and "to be announced" another, "when he was going to come" one thing and "when he had come" another.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.8 (CSEL 44:132–133; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-8).

## Letter 138.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-9
- Source: CSEL 44:133–134
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To the charge that Christ's teaching on non-retaliation harms the state, Augustine replies that Roman authors themselves praised those who preferred to pardon injuries.

### Latin text

Nunc deinde uideamus, quale sit, quod in epistula tua sequitur. adiecisti enim eos dicere, quod Christi praedicatio atque doctrina rei publicae moribus nulla ex parte conueniat, cuius hoc constet esse praeceptum, ut nulli malum pro malo reddere debeamus et percutienti aliam praebere maxillam et pallium dare ei, qui tunicam auferre perstiterit, et cum eo, qui nos angariare uoluerit, ire debere spatio itineris duplicato, quae omnia rei publicae moribus adseruntur esse contraria. nam quis, inquiunt, tolli sibi ab hoste aliquid patiatur uel Romanae prouinciae depraedatoribus non mala uelit belli iure reponere? haec atque huius modi uerba obtrectantium siue non obtrectando sed quaerendo talia loquentium operosius fortasse refellerem, nisi haec disceptationes haberentur cum uiris liberaliter institutis. unde quid opus est, ut diutius laboremus ac non ipsos potius percontemur, quo modo poterant gubernare atque augere rem publicam, quam ex parua et inopi magnam opulentamque fecerunt, qui accepta iniuria ignoscere quam persequi malebant? quo modo Caesari, utique administratori rei publicae, mores eius extollens Cicero dicebat, quod nihil obliuisci soleret nisi iniurias? dicebat enim hoc tam magnus laudator aut tam magnus adulator; sed si laudator, talem Caesarem nouerat, si autem adulator, talem esse debere ostendebat principem ciuitatis, qualem illum fallaciter praedicabat. quid est autem non reddere malum pro malo nisi abhorrere ab ulciscendi libidine, quod est accepta iniuria ignoscere malle quam persequi et nihil nisi iniurias obliuisci?

### English translation (Claude)

Now let us see what follows in your letter. For you added that they say that Christ's preaching and teaching are in no way compatible with the customs of the state, since his precept is well known that we should render evil for evil to no one, and offer the other cheek to one who strikes us, and give our cloak to one who persists in taking our tunic, and go twice the distance of the journey with one who wishes to press us into service; all of which are asserted to be contrary to the customs of the state. "For who," they say, "would allow something to be taken from him by an enemy, or not wish to repay, by the law of war, evils to the plunderers of a Roman province?" These and similar words of detractors, or of those who say such things not as detractors but as inquirers, I would perhaps refute more laboriously were these discussions not being held with men of liberal education. Why then need we labor longer, and not rather ask them how those men could govern and enlarge the state, which they made great and wealthy from small and poor, who "preferred to pardon an injury received rather than avenge it"? How did Cicero, praising the character of Caesar, who was certainly the administrator of the state, say that he "was accustomed to forget nothing except injuries"? He said this as either so great a praiser or so great a flatterer; but if as a praiser, he knew Caesar to be such; if as a flatterer, he was showing that the ruler of the state ought to be such as he falsely proclaimed him to be. And what is not rendering evil for evil but shrinking from the lust for revenge, which is to prefer to pardon an injury received rather than avenge it, and to forget nothing except injuries?

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:39: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:40: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:41: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 9.5 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Lig. 35 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:39–41; Rom 12:17. Sallust, Catiline 9.5 ("accepta iniuria ignoscere quam persequi malebant"); Cicero, Pro Ligario 12.35 (Caesar forgets nothing but injuries).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.9 (CSEL 44:133–134; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-9).

## Letter 138.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-10
- Source: CSEL 44:134–136
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Romans applaud forgiveness in their own authors but accuse the church that preaches it; a city is a multitude bound by concord, which their quarreling gods could not teach.

### Latin text

Haec cum in eorum leguntur auctoribus, exclamatur et plauditur; describi atque praedicari mores uidentur, quibus dignum esset exsurgere ciuitatem, quae tot gentibus imperaret, quod accepta iniuria ignoscere quam persequi malebant. cum uero legitur praecipiente auctoritate diuina non reddendum malum pro malo, cum haec tam salubris admonitio congregationibus populorum tamquam publicis utriusque sexus atque omnium aetatum et dignitatum scholis de superiore loco personat, accusatur religio tamquam inimica rei publicae. quae si, ut dignum est, audiretur, longe melius Romulo, Numa, Bruto ceterisque illis Romanae gentis praeclaris uiris constitueret, consecraret, firmaret augeretque rem publicam. quid enim est res publica nisi res populi? res ergo communis, res utique ciuitatis. quid est autem ciuitas nisi hominum multitudo in quoddam uinculum redacta concordiae? apud eos enim legitur ita: Breui multitudo diuersa atque uaga concordia ciuitas facta erat. quae porro praecepta concordiae in suis templis umquam illi legenda censuerunt, quando quidem miseri quaerere cogebantur, quonam modo sine offensione cuiusquam eorum discordes inter se deos suos colere possent, quos imitari discordando si uellent, rupto concordiae uinculo ciuitas laberetur, quod postea paulatim decoloratis corruptisque moribus agi coepit per bella ciuilia?

### English translation (Claude)

When these things are read in their own authors, there is acclaim and applause; they seem to describe and proclaim the character worthy of a state destined to rule so many nations: that "they preferred to pardon an injury received rather than avenge it." But when it is read, by command of divine authority, that evil is not to be repaid for evil, when this so wholesome admonition resounds from a higher place to the congregations of the people, as in public schools of both sexes and of all ages and ranks, religion is accused as an enemy of the state. Yet if it were heeded as it deserves, it would establish, consecrate, strengthen, and enlarge the state far better than Romulus, Numa, Brutus, and those other famous men of the Roman nation. For what is a state (res publica) but the property of the people (res populi)? A common property, then, the property of the city. And what is a city but a multitude of human beings brought into a certain bond of concord? For in their authors it is read thus: "In a short time a diverse and wandering multitude had become, by concord, a city." Yet what precepts of concord did they ever decree should be read in their temples, since the wretched people were compelled to ask how they might worship their gods, who were in discord among themselves, without offending any of them? If they had chosen to imitate those gods in discord, the bond of concord would have been broken and the city would have fallen; which afterward began to happen through the civil wars, as their morals were gradually tarnished and corrupted.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 6.2 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Rep. 1.39 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sallust, Catiline 9.5 and 6.2; the definition of the state as "res populi" is Cicero's (De re publica 1.25.39).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.10 (CSEL 44:134–136; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-10).

## Letter 138.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-11
- Source: CSEL 44:136–137
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's precepts of non-retaliation aim to overcome evil with good, so that the wrongdoer may be corrected and restored to concord.

### Latin text

Quanta uero praecepta concordiae non humanis disputationibus exquisita sed diuina auctoritate conscripta in Christi ecclesiis lectitentur, quis uel ab illa religione alienus ita surdus est, ut ignoret? ad hoc enim et illa pertinent, quae malunt exagitare quam discere, alteram percutienti praebendam esse maxillam, uolenti auferre tunicam dandum etiam pallium, cum angariante duplicandam uiam. hoc quippe fit, ut uincatur bono malus, immo in homine malo uincatur bono malum et homo liberetur a malo non exteriore et alieno sed intimo ac suo, quo grauius et perniciosius quam cuiusuis hostis extrinsecus immanitate uastatur. qui ergo uincit bono malum, patienter amittit temporalia commoda, ut doceat, quam pro fide atque iustitia contemnenda sint, quae ille nimis amando fit malus. ac sic iniuriosus ab eo ipso, cui fecit iniuriam, discat, qualia sint, propter quae fecit iniuriam, atque in concordiam, qua nihil est utilius ciuitati, paenitens adquiratur uictus non saeuientis uiribus sed beniuolentia patientis. tunc enim recte fit, cum uidetur ei profuturum esse, propter quem fit ad operandam in eo correctionem atque concordiam. hoc certe animo faciendum est, etiam si alius exitus consequatur nec corrigi uelit atque pacari, propter quem corrigendum atque pacandum uelut curandum et sanandum adhibita est ista medicina.

### English translation (Claude)

And how many precepts of concord, not devised by human disputations but written by divine authority, are constantly read in the churches of Christ: who, even a stranger to that religion, is so deaf as not to know? For to this end belong also those things which they prefer to attack rather than learn: that the other cheek is to be offered to one who strikes, that the cloak also is to be given to one who wishes to take the tunic, that the road is to be doubled with one who presses us into service. For in this way the bad man is overcome by good, or rather, in the bad man the evil is overcome by good, and the man is freed from an evil not external and foreign but inward and his own, by which he is ravaged more gravely and more destructively than by the savagery of any enemy from outside. He, then, who overcomes evil with good patiently gives up temporal advantages, so as to show how much those things are to be despised for the sake of faith and justice, by loving which too much the other becomes bad. And so the one who did the injury may learn from the very person he injured what sort of things those are for which he did the injury, and may be won back, repentant, into concord, than which nothing is more useful to a city, overcome not by the force of one who rages but by the goodwill of one who endures. For it is rightly done when it seems likely to benefit the one for whose sake it is done, by working correction and concord in him. Certainly it must be done with this intention, even if another outcome follows, and the one for whose correction and pacification, as for his treatment and healing, this medicine was applied refuses to be corrected and pacified.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:39: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:40: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:41: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:39–41; Rom 12:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.11 (CSEL 44:136–137; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-11).

## Letter 138.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-12
- Source: CSEL 44:137–138
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The command to turn the other cheek is not to be taken literally but as teaching patience: temporal things should be yielded for the sake of eternal ones.

### Latin text

Alioquin si uerba adtenderimus eorumque proprietati seruiendum putauerimus, non est praebenda dextera maxilla, si fuerit sinistra percussa, quoniam: Si quis te, inquit, percusserit in maxillam dexteram, praebe illi et sinistram. magis autem sinistra percutitur, quod a dextera ferientis facilior ictus est. sed sic intellegi solet, ac si dictum esset: Si quis in te meliora fuerit persecutus, et inferiora ei praebe, ne uindictae potius quam patientiae studens contemnas aeterna pro temporalibus, cum potius temporalia pro aeternis contemnenda sint, tamquam sinistra pro dextris. haec semper fuit sanctorum martyrum intentio; uindicta enim ultima iusta poscitur, quando nullus iam restat correctionis locus, extremo scilicet summoque iudicio. nunc uero cauendum est, ne uindicandi cupiditate amittatur, ut nihil aliud, ipsa patientia, quae pluris habenda est quam omne, quod potest etiam inuito inimicus auferre. namque alius euangelista in eadem sententia nullam fecit dexterae mentionem, sed tantum maxillam et alteram nominauit, ut aliquanto distinctius intellegeretur in alio, ipse autem simpliciter eandem patientiam commendaret. paratus itaque debet esse homo iustus et pius patienter eorum malitiam sustinere, quos fieri bonos quaerit, ut numerus potius crescat bonorum, non ut pari malitia se quoque numero addat malorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Otherwise, if we attended to the words and thought we must keep to their strict sense, the right cheek would not have to be offered if the left had been struck, since he says: "If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, offer him the left also." But the left is more often struck, because a blow is easier from the right hand of the striker. But it is usually understood as if it had been said: If anyone has attacked your better things, offer him your lesser things too, lest, more eager for revenge than for patience, you despise eternal things for temporal, when rather temporal things are to be despised for eternal, as the left for the right. This was always the intention of the holy martyrs; for final just vengeance is demanded when no room for correction remains any longer, namely at the last and supreme judgment. But now we must beware lest, through desire for revenge, we lose, if nothing else, patience itself, which is to be valued more than all that an enemy can take away even against our will. For another evangelist, in the same saying, made no mention of the right cheek, but named only the cheek and the other one, so that it might be understood somewhat more distinctly in the one, while he himself simply commended the same patience. The just and devout man, then, ought to be ready patiently to bear the malice of those whom he seeks to make good, so that the number of the good may rather increase, not that he too, by like malice, should add himself to the number of the bad.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:39: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:29: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:39; Luke 6:29 (the "other evangelist").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.12 (CSEL 44:137–138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-12).

## Letter 138.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-13
- Source: CSEL 44:138–139
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ and Paul, when struck, did not literally turn the other cheek, showing that the precept concerns the heart's readiness more than the outward act.

### Latin text

Denique ista praecepta magis ad praeparationem cordis, quae intus est, pertinere quam ad opus, quod in aperto fit, ut teneatur in secreto animi patientia cum beniuolentia, in manifesto autem id fiat, quod eis uidetur prodesse posse, quibus bene uelle debemus, hinc liquido ostenditur, quod ipse dominus Christus, exemplum singulare patientiae, cum percuteretur in faciem, respondit: Si male dixi, exprobra de malo; si autem bene, quid me caedis? nequaquam igitur praeceptum suum, si uerba intuemur, impleuit; neque enim praebuit percutienti alteram partem, sed potius prohibuit, ne, qui fecerat, augeret iniuriam, et tamen paratus uenerat non solum in faciem percuti uerum etiam pro his quoque, a quibus haec patiebatur, crucifixus occidi, pro quibus ait in cruce pendens: Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt, quid faciunt. nec Paulus apostolus praeceptum domini et magistri sui uidetur implesse, ubi etiam ipse percussus in faciem dixit principi sacerdotum: Percutiet te deus, paries dealbate. sedes iudicare me secundum legem et contra legem iubes me percuti. et cum a circumstantibus diceretur: Iniuriam facis principi sacerdotum, inridenter eos uoluit admonere, quid dixerit, ut, qui saperent, intellegerent iam destruendum fuisse aduentu Christi parietem dealbatum, hoc est hypocrisin sacerdotii Iudaeorum; ait quippe: Nesciui, fratres, quia princeps est; scriptum est enim: Principi populi tui non maledices, cum procul dubio, qui in eodem populo creuerat atque ibi lege fuerat eruditus, illum principem sacerdotum nescire non posset nec eos, quibus ita notus erat, ullo modo falleret, quod nesciret.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, that these precepts belong more to the inward disposition of the heart than to the outward act, so that patience with goodwill is kept in the secret of the mind, while openly that is done which seems able to benefit those to whom we ought to wish well, is clearly shown by the fact that the Lord Christ himself, the unique example of patience, when he was struck in the face, answered: "If I have spoken wrongly, bear witness to the wrong; but if rightly, why do you strike me?" So, if we look at the words, he by no means fulfilled his own precept; for he did not offer the other side to the one who struck him, but rather prevented the one who had done it from adding to the injury; and yet he had come ready not only to be struck in the face but also to be crucified and killed for those very people from whom he was suffering these things, for whom he said as he hung on the cross: "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." Nor does the apostle Paul seem to have fulfilled the precept of his Lord and Master when he too, struck in the face, said to the chief priest: "God will strike you, you whitewashed wall. You sit to judge me according to the law, and contrary to the law you order me to be struck." And when the bystanders said, "You are insulting the chief priest," he wished to admonish them ironically of what he had said, so that those who were wise might understand that the whitewashed wall, that is, the hypocrisy of the Jewish priesthood, was already to be destroyed by the coming of Christ; for he said: "I did not know, brothers, that he is the chief priest; for it is written: You shall not speak evil of the ruler of your people"; when without doubt one who had grown up among that same people and been educated in the law there could not fail to know the chief priest, nor could he in any way deceive those to whom he was so well known into thinking that he did not know him.

### Scripture references

- John 18:23: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:34: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 23:3: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 23:4: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 23:5: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 22:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:39: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 18:23; Luke 23:34; Acts 23:3–5; Exod 22:28. Augustine reads Paul's "I did not know" as ironic; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.13 (CSEL 44:138–139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-13).

## Letter 138.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-14
- Source: CSEL 44:139–141
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Patience lives in the heart, but correction, like a father's or even a just war, may be applied with goodwill for the wrongdoer's good; the prosperity of vice is God's sharpest punishment.

### Latin text

Sunt ergo ista praecepta patientiae semper in cordis praeparatione retinenda ipsaque beniuolentia, ne reddatur malum pro malo, semper in uoluntate complenda est. agenda sunt autem multa etiam cum inuitis benigna quadam asperitate plectendis, quorum potius utilitati consulendum est quam uoluntati, quod in principe ciuitatis luculentissime illorum litterae laudauerunt. nam in corripiendo filio quamlibet aspere numquam profecto amor paternus amittitur; fit tamen, quod nolit et doleat, qui etiam inuitus uidetur dolore sanandus. ac per hoc si terrena ista res publica praecepta Christiana custodiat, et ipsa bella sine beniuolentia non gerentur, ut ad pietatis iustitiaeque pacatam societatem uictis facilius consulatur. nam cui licentia iniquitatis eripitur, utiliter uincitur, quoniam nihil est infelicius felicitate peccantium, qua poenalis nutritur impunitas et mala uoluntas uelut hostis interior roboratur. sed peruersa et aduersa corda mortalium felices res humanas putant, cum tectorum splendor adtenditur et labes non adtenditur animorum, cum theatrorum moles extruuntur et effodiuntur fundamenta uirtutum, cum gloriosa est effusionis insania et opera misericordiae deridentur, cum ex his, quae diuitibus abundant, luxuriantur histriones et necessaria uix habent pauperes, cum deus, qui doctrinae suae publicis uocibus contra hoc malum publicum clamat, ab impiis populis blasphematur et dii tales requiruntur, in quorum honorem illa ipsa theatrica corporum et animorum dedecora celebrentur. haec si deus pollere permittat, tunc indignatur grauius; haec si inpunita dimittat, tunc punit infestius. cum uero euertit subsidium uitiorum et copiosas libidines inopes reddit, misericorditer aduersatur; misericorditer enim, si fieri posset, etiam bella gererentur a bonis, ut licentiosis cupiditatibus domitis haec uitia perderentur. quae iusto imperio uel extirpari uel premi debuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

These precepts of patience, then, are always to be kept in the readiness of the heart, and that same goodwill, not to render evil for evil, is always to be fulfilled in the will. But many things must also be done with those who are unwilling, who must be punished with a kind of kindly severity, whose benefit must be considered rather than their wishes; and their writers have most brilliantly praised this in the ruler of a city. For in correcting a son, however harshly, a father's love is certainly never lost; yet what the son does not want and what pains him is done, since even against his will he seems to need healing by pain. And so, if this earthly state kept the Christian precepts, even wars themselves would not be waged without goodwill, so that the conquered might more easily be brought into a peaceful fellowship of piety and justice. For he from whom the license of wickedness is taken away is conquered to his benefit, since nothing is more unhappy than the happiness of sinners, by which a penal impunity is nourished and a bad will, like an enemy within, is strengthened. But the perverse and contrary hearts of mortals think human affairs happy when the splendor of buildings is regarded and the ruin of souls is not regarded, when huge theaters are built up and the foundations of virtues dug away, when the madness of extravagance is glorious and works of mercy are mocked, when actors live in luxury on what abounds to the rich and the poor scarcely have necessities, when God, who cries out against this public evil by the public voices of his teaching, is blasphemed by ungodly peoples, and such gods are sought in whose honor those very theatrical disgraces of body and soul are celebrated. If God allows these things to flourish, then he is more gravely angry; if he lets them go unpunished, then he punishes more severely. But when he overthrows the supports of vices and makes abundant lusts poor, he opposes them mercifully; for mercifully, if it were possible, even wars would be waged by the good, so that by taming licentious desires those vices might be destroyed which ought to have been either rooted out or suppressed by just rule.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's statement that wars may be waged "with goodwill" by the good is an early statement of his just-war thinking; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.14 (CSEL 44:139–141; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-14).

## Letter 138.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-15
- Source: CSEL 44:141–142
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christian teaching does not forbid military service, as John the Baptist's words to soldiers show; citizens formed by it would be the state's salvation.

### Latin text

Nam si Christiana disciplina omnia bella culparet, hoc potius militibus consilium salutis petentibus in euangelio diceretur, ut abicerent arma seque militiae omnino subtraherent. dictum est eis autem: Neminem concusseritis, nulli calumniam feceritis, sufficiat uobis stipendium uestrum. quibus proprium stipendium sufficere debere praecepit, militare utique non prohibuit. proinde, qui doctrinam Christi aduersam dicunt esse rei publicae, dent exercitum talem, quales doctrina Christi esse milites iussit; dent tales prouinciales, tales maritos, tales coniuges, tales parentes, tales filios, tales dominos, tales seruos, tales reges, tales iudices, tales denique debitorum ipsius fisci redditores et exactores, quales esse praecepit doctrina Christiana. et audeant eam dicere aduersam esse rei publicae, immo uero dubitent confiteri magnam, si ei obtemperetur, salutem esse rei publicae.

### English translation (Claude)

For if Christian teaching condemned all wars, this would rather have been said in the Gospel to the soldiers who asked for counsel for their salvation: that they should throw away their arms and withdraw from military service altogether. But it was said to them: "Do not extort from anyone, do not falsely accuse anyone, let your wages suffice you." When he told them that their own wages ought to suffice them, he certainly did not forbid them to serve. Therefore, let those who say that Christ's teaching is opposed to the state give us an army of such soldiers as the teaching of Christ commanded soldiers to be; let them give such provincials, such husbands, such wives, such parents, such children, such masters, such slaves, such kings, such judges, and finally such payers and collectors of what is owed to the treasury itself as Christian teaching commands them to be; and then let them dare to say that it is opposed to the state; nay rather, let them not hesitate to confess that, if it is obeyed, it is the great salvation of the state.

### Scripture references

- Luke 3:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 3:14 (John the Baptist's reply). The list of household roles echoes the New Testament household codes.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.15 (CSEL 44:141–142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-15).

## Letter 138.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-16
- Source: CSEL 44:142–143
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The decline of Rome began long before Christ, as Sallust and Juvenal testify, through avarice and luxury, not through Christian teaching.

### Latin text

Ut quid autem ad illud respondeam, quod dicunt, per quosdam imperatores Christianos multa mala imperio accidisse Romano? haec generalis conquestio calumniosa est. nam si apertius certe de praeteritis imperatoribus aliqua commemorarent, possem similia uel fortasse etiam grauiora de imperatoribus non Christianis et ego commemorare, ut intellegerent uel hominum haec esse uitia non doctrinae uel non imperatorum sed aliorum, sine quibus imperatores agere nihil possunt. ex quo enim tempore pessum ire coeperit Romana res publica, satis liquet; litterae loquuntur ipsorum; longe ante, quam Christi nomen eluxisset in terris, dictum est: O urbem uenalem et mature perituram, si emptorem inuenerit! in libro etiam belli Catilinae ante aduentum utique Christi idem nobilissimus historicus eorum non tacet, quando primum insueuerit exercitus populi Romani amare, potare, signa, tabulas pictas, uasa caelata mirari, ea priuatim et publice rapere, delubra spoliare, sacra profanaque omnia polluere. quando ergo nec hominibus nec ipsis etiam, quos deos putabant, morum corruptorum et perditorum auaritia rapacitasque parcebat, tunc coepit perire laudabile illud decus salusque rei publicae. quos deinde uitia pessima successus habuerint et quanto humanarum rerum malo illa iniquitas prosperata sit, nunc longum est dicere. audiant satiricum suum garriendo uera dicentem: Seruabat castas humilis fortuna Latinas quondam nec uitiis contingi parua sinebat tecta labor somnique breues et uellere Tusco uexatae duraeque manus et proximus urbi Hannibal et stantes Collina turre mariti. nunc patimur longae pacis mala, saeuior armis luxuria incubuit uictumque ulciscitur orbem. nullum crimen abest facinusque libidinis, ex quo paupertas Romana perit. quid igitur expectas, ut ego exaggerem, quanta mala inportauerit successu prospero iniquitas subleuata, quando quidem et ipsi, qui aliquanto prudentius adtenderunt, plus dolendum uiderunt paupertatem quam opulentiam perisse Romanam? in illa enim morum integritas seruabatur, per hanc autem non muros urbis sed mentes ipsius ciuitatis dira nequitia omni hoste peior inrupit.

### English translation (Claude)

And why should I answer the claim that many evils befell the Roman Empire through certain Christian emperors? This general complaint is slanderous. For if they mentioned anything more openly about particular past emperors, I too could mention similar or perhaps even worse things about emperors who were not Christians, so that they might understand that these are the faults either of men, not of the teaching, or not of the emperors but of others without whom emperors can do nothing. For from what time the Roman state began to go to ruin is clear enough; their own writings speak. Long before the name of Christ had shone on earth it was said: "O city for sale, and soon to perish, if it finds a buyer!" In the book on the war of Catiline too, certainly before the coming of Christ, the same most noble historian of theirs does not keep silent about when the army of the Roman people first became accustomed to make love, to drink, to admire statues, paintings, and embossed vessels, to seize them privately and publicly, to plunder shrines, and to pollute everything sacred and profane. When, therefore, the avarice and rapacity of corrupt and abandoned morals spared neither men nor even those whom they took for gods, then that praiseworthy glory and well-being of the state began to perish. What progress the worst vices then made, and with how great harm to human affairs that wickedness prospered, would take long to tell now. Let them hear their own satirist speaking truth in his chatter: "Once a humble fortune kept the Latin women chaste, and toil and short sleep and hands roughened and hardened by Tuscan wool did not let their small houses be touched by vice, nor Hannibal close to the city, and husbands standing on the Colline tower. Now we suffer the evils of long peace; luxury, more savage than arms, has settled on us and avenges the conquered world. No crime and no deed of lust is lacking since Roman poverty perished." Why then do you expect me to enlarge on how great evils wickedness brought in when raised up by prosperity, since even those who looked at it somewhat more wisely saw that the passing of Roman poverty was more to be lamented than that of Roman wealth? For in the former integrity of morals was preserved; but through the latter dire wickedness, worse than any enemy, broke in, not upon the walls of the city but upon the minds of the citizens themselves.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Jug. 35.10 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence
- Sallust, Cat. 11.6 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence
- Juvenal, Sat. 6.287–295 (Juvenal, Satires): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sallust, Jugurtha 35.10 ("O city for sale...") and Catiline 11.6; Juvenal, Satires 6.287–295.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.16 (CSEL 44:142–143; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-16).

## Letter 138.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-17
- Source: CSEL 44:143–145
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God sent the cross of Christ as help against moral corruption; Rome's civic virtues built an earthly city, but true religion makes people citizens of the city whose king is truth and whose law is love.

### Latin text

Gratias domino deo nostro, qui contra ista mala misit nobis adiutorium singulare. quo enim non tolleret, quem non inuolueret, in quod profundum non demergeret fluuius iste horrendae nequitiae generis humani, nisi crux Christi in tanta uelut mole auctoritatis eminentius firmiusque figeretur, cuius adprehenso robore stabiles essemus, ne male suadentium uel in mala inpellentium tam uasto mundi huius abrepti gurgite sorberemur? in ista enim conluuie morum pessimorum et ueteris perditae disciplinae maxime uenire ac subuenire debuit caelestis auctoritas, quae uoluntariam paupertatem, quae continentiam, beniuolentiam, iustitiam atque concordiam ueramque pietatem persuaderet ceterasque uitae luminosas ualidasque uirtutes non tantum propter istam uitam honestissime gerendam nec tantum propter ciuitatis terrenae concordissimam societatem uerum etiam propter adipiscendam sempiternam salutem et sempiterni cuiusdam populi caelestem diuinamque rem publicam, cui nos ciues adsciscit fides, spes, caritas, ut, quam diu inde peregrinamur, feramus eos, si corrigere non ualemus, qui uitiis inpunitis uolunt stare rem publicam, quam primi Romani constituerunt auxeruntque uirtutibus etsi non habentes ueram pietatem erga deum uerum, quae illos etiam in aeternam ciuitatem posset salubri religione perducere, custodientes tamen quandam sui generis probitatem, quae posset terrenae ciuitati constituendae, augendae conseruandaeque sufficere. deus enim sic ostendit in opulentissimo et praeclaro imperio Romanorum, quantum ualerent ciuiles etiam sine uera religione uirtutes, ut intellegeretur hac addita fieri homines ciues alterius ciuitatis, cuius rex ueritas, cuius lex caritas, cuius modus aeternitas.

### English translation (Claude)

Thanks be to the Lord our God, who sent us unique help against these evils. For where would this river of the horrible wickedness of the human race not have carried us, whom would it not have engulfed, into what depth would it not have plunged us, had not the cross of Christ been fixed, more prominently and more firmly, on so great a mass, as it were, of authority, so that by grasping its strength we might stand firm and not be swallowed up, swept away in the vast whirlpool of this world by those who counsel evil or drive us into evil? For in this sink of the worst morals and of the ancient discipline lost, heavenly authority above all had to come and come to our aid, to persuade us to voluntary poverty, to continence, goodwill, justice, concord, and true piety, and the other bright and strong virtues of life, not only for living this life most honorably, nor only for the most harmonious fellowship of the earthly city, but also for attaining everlasting salvation and the heavenly and divine commonwealth of a certain everlasting people, to which faith, hope, and love enroll us as citizens; so that, as long as we are pilgrims away from it, we may bear with those, if we cannot correct them, who want the state to stand with vices unpunished, the state which the first Romans established and enlarged by virtues, even though they did not have true piety toward the true God, which could also have led them by a saving religion into the eternal city; yet they kept a certain uprightness of its own kind, which could suffice for founding, enlarging, and preserving an earthly city. For God showed in the most wealthy and famous empire of the Romans how much civic virtues could achieve even without true religion, so that it might be understood that, when this is added, human beings become citizens of another city, whose king is truth, whose law is love, whose measure is eternity.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Heb 11:16: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The contrast of the earthly city and the heavenly city anticipates the City of God, dedicated to Marcellinus. 1 Cor 13:13 (faith, hope, love).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.17 (CSEL 44:143–145; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-17).

## Letter 138.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-18
- Source: CSEL 44:145–146
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Comparing Apollonius and Apuleius with Christ is laughable; Christian teaching is called an enemy of the state because it exposed the demons behind pagan gods and magic.

### Latin text

Quis autem uel risu dignum putet, quod Apollonium et Apuleium ceterosque magicarum artium peritissimos conferre Christo uel etiam praeferre conantur? quamquam tolerabilius ferendum sit, quando istos ei potius comparant quam deos suos; multo enim melior, quod fatendum est, Apollonius fuit quam tot stuprorum auctor et perpetrator, quem Iouem nominant. ista, inquiunt, fabulosa sunt. adhuc ergo laudent rei publicae luxuriosam, licentiosam planeque sacrilegam felicitatem, quae ista deorum probra confinxit, quae non solum in fabulis audienda posuit, uerum etiam in theatris spectanda proposuit, ubi crimina essent plura quam numina, quae ipsi dii sibi exhiberi habebant libenter, qui in suos cultores uindicare debuerunt, quod ea uiderent saltem patienter. sed non sunt ipsi, inquiunt, qui talium fabularum mendacio celebrantur. qui ergo sunt isti, qui talium turpitudinum celebratione placantur? horum daemonum peruersitatem atque fallaciam, per quos et magicae artes humanas mentes decipiunt, quia prodidit doctrina Christiana, quia mundo uniuerso patefecit, quia sanctos angelos ab eorum malignitate distinxit, quia cauendos potius et quem ad modum cauerentur admonuit, rei publicae dicitur inimica, quasi non, si omnino per istos esset temporalis obtinenda felicitas, quaelibet potius fuerat infelicitas eligenda. sed neque hinc deus uoluit dubitari, qui primum populum unum deum uerum colentem deos autem falsissimos contemnentem, quam diu oportuit testamentum uetus, ubi uelamentum testamenti noui est, obumbrari, tanta rerum terrenarum felicitate honestauit, ut quiuis intellegat nec ipsam esse in daemonum potestate sed in illius unius, cui angeli seruiunt, quem daemones contremescunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But who would think it even worth a laugh that they try to compare Apollonius and Apuleius and the others most skilled in magical arts with Christ, or even to prefer them to him? Though it is more tolerable when they compare these men to him rather than their gods; for Apollonius was, it must be admitted, far better than that author and perpetrator of so many acts of debauchery whom they call Jupiter. "These things," they say, "are fables." Then let them go on praising the luxurious, licentious, and plainly sacrilegious prosperity of the state which invented these disgraces of the gods, which not only set them forth to be heard in fables but also displayed them to be seen in theaters, where crimes were more numerous than deities, and which the gods themselves were glad to have shown to them, when they ought to have punished their worshipers for watching them even patiently. "But they themselves," they say, "are not the ones celebrated in the lie of such fables." Who then are these who are appeased by the celebration of such disgraces? Because Christian teaching has exposed the perversity and deceit of these demons, through whom magical arts also deceive human minds, because it has laid it open to the whole world, because it has distinguished the holy angels from their malignity, because it has warned that they are rather to be guarded against, and how, it is called an enemy of the state; as if, were temporal happiness wholly to be obtained through them, any unhappiness whatever were not rather to be chosen. But God did not wish there to be doubt on this point either; for he honored the first people, who worshiped the one true God and despised utterly false gods, with such prosperity in earthly things, as long as the Old Testament, in which the New Testament is veiled, was to be overshadowed, that anyone may understand that even that prosperity is not in the power of demons but of that One whom angels serve and before whom demons tremble.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:19: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Apollonius of Tyana and Apuleius (see Letters 136 and 137). Jas 2:19 (demons tremble).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.18 (CSEL 44:145–146; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-18).

## Letter 138.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-19
- Source: CSEL 44:146–147
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Apuleius with all his supposed magic never gained high office and himself denied practicing magic, whereas David rose from shepherd to king without any such arts.

### Latin text

Apuleius enim, ut de illo potissimum loquamur, qui nobis Afris Afer est notior, non dico ad regnum sed ne ad aliquam quidem iudiciariam rei publicae potestatem cum omnibus suis magicis artibus potuit peruenire honesto patriae suae loco natus et liberaliter educatus magnaque praeditus eloquentia. an forte ista ut philosophus uoluntate contempsit, qui sacerdos prouinciae pro magno fuit ut munera ederet uenatoresque uestiret et pro statua sibi apud Oeenses locanda, ex qua ciuitate habebat uxorem, aduersus contradictionem quorundam ciuium litigaret? quod posteros ne lateret, eiusdem litis orationem scriptam memoriae commendauit. quod ergo ad istam terrenam pertinet felicitatem, fuit magus ille, quod potuit. unde apparet nihil eum amplius fuisse, non quia noluit, sed quia non potuit. quamquam et aduersus quosdam, qui ei magicarum artium crimen intenderant, eloquentissime se defendit. unde miror laudatores eius, qui eum nescio qua fecisse miracula illis artibus praedicant, contra eius defensionem testes esse conari. sed uiderint, utrum ipsi uerum perhibeant testimonium et ille falsam defensionem. illud, si sapiunt, adtendant, qui magicas artes non utique nisi pro felicitate terrena uel damnabili curiositate conquirunt uel ab eis innocentes periculosa tamen eas admiratione conlaudant, et uideant Dauid nostrum sine ullis talibus artibus ex pastore ouium peruenisse ad regiam dignitatem, cuius et peccata et merita fidelis scriptura non tacuit, ut sciremus, et quibus modis non offenderetur deus et quibus modis placaretur offensus.

### English translation (Claude)

For Apuleius, to speak of him above all, who as an African is better known to us Africans, with all his magical arts could not attain, I will not say to a kingdom, but not even to any judicial office in the state, though he was born of an honorable family in his homeland, liberally educated, and endowed with great eloquence. Or did he perhaps, as a philosopher, despise these things voluntarily, he who as priest of the province made much of giving games and clothing the hunters, and went to law, against the opposition of some citizens, to have a statue of himself set up among the people of Oea, from which city he had his wife? Lest this escape posterity, he committed to memory the written speech of that same lawsuit. As far as this earthly happiness is concerned, then, that magician was what he could be. Hence it appears that he was nothing more, not because he did not wish it, but because he could not. And yet he defended himself most eloquently against certain people who had brought against him the charge of magical arts. Hence I wonder at his admirers, who proclaim that he did some miracles or other by those arts, that they try to be witnesses against his own defense. But let them see whether they themselves bear true testimony and he made a false defense. Let those, if they are wise, take note, who seek magical arts only for earthly happiness or out of damnable curiosity, or who, though innocent of them, praise them with dangerous admiration; and let them see our David, who without any such arts came from shepherd of sheep to royal dignity, whose sins and merits alike faithful Scripture did not keep silent, so that we might know both by what means God is not offended and by what means, when offended, he is appeased.

### Scripture references

- 1 Sam 16:11: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 7:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Apuleius, Apology (Apuleius): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Apuleius defended himself against a charge of magic in his Apology (delivered at Sabratha; his wife Pudentilla was from Oea). 1 Sam 16:11–13; 2 Sam 7:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.19 (CSEL 44:146–147; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-19).

## Letter 138.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-20
- Source: CSEL 44:147–148
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Magicians cannot be compared even with the prophets, still less with Christ whom the prophets foretold; Augustine invites further questions.

### Latin text

Quantum autem adtinet ad miracula, quae humanis sensibus stupenda monstrantur, multum errant, qui prophetis sanctis miraculorum magnorum nobilitate praestantibus magos comparant. quanto magis, si eos comparent Christo, quem prophetae illi, quibus magi quilibet nullo modo sunt comparandi, praenuntiauerunt esse uenturum et secundum carnem, quam sumpsit ex uirgine, et secundum diuinitatem, qua numquam separatur a patre! Video me fecisse prolixissimam epistulam nec tamen de Christo dixisse omnia, quae uel eis, qui uel tardiore ingenio diuina non ualent adsequi, uel eis, quos, licet acute moueantur, contentiosum tamen studium et praeoccupatio diuturni erroris ab intellegendo impedit, possint utcumque sufficere. uerum tamen cognosce, quid eos contra moueat, atque rescribe, ut uel epistulis uel libris, si adiuuerit deus, ad omnia respondere curemus. sis in domino felix gratia et misericordia eius, domine eximie et merito insignis, carissime ac desiderantissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

As regards the miracles that are shown to human senses as astonishing, those greatly err who compare magicians with the holy prophets, who excel in the renown of great miracles; how much more if they compare them with Christ, whom those prophets, to whom no magicians whatever can in any way be compared, foretold would come, both according to the flesh which he took from the virgin and according to the divinity by which he is never separated from the Father! I see that I have written a very long letter, and yet I have not said everything about Christ that might somehow suffice either for those who, by a slower mind, cannot attain divine things, or for those whom, though they are keenly moved, a contentious zeal and the preoccupation of long-standing error keep from understanding. But find out what further moves them against it, and write back, so that, with God's help, we may take care to answer everything, either in letters or in books. May you be happy in the Lord by his grace and mercy, my excellent lord, deservedly distinguished, most dear and most longed-for son.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 138.20 (CSEL 44:147–148; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/138-1/#p-138-20).

## Letter 139.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-1
- Source: CSEL 44:148–150
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Marcellinus for the records of the Donatists' trial, so that their confessions may be read in the churches and posted publicly.

### Latin text

Gesta, quae promisit praestantia tua, uehementer expecto et in ecclesia Hipponiensi iam iamque cupio recitari ac, si fieri potuerit, per omnes ecclesias etiam in dioecesi constitutas, ut audiant homines pleneque agnoscant confessores iniquitatis non dei timore extorquente paenitentiam sed iudiciaria diligentia crudelissimorum pectorum aperiente duritiam siue illorum, qui de homicidio et de excaecato ac debilitato presbyteri corpore........, siue illorum, qui se illa scire potuisse, quamuis sibi dicerent displicere, negare non ausi sunt refugientes catholicam pacem, uelut ne criminibus polluantur alienis, et in illo schismatis sacrilegio inter sceleratorum tam immanium tantam multitudinem perdurantes, siue etiam illorum, qui se inde non recessuros etiam demonstrata sibi catholica ueritate et Donatistarum peruersitate dixerunt. non est leue, quod deus agi uoluit per operam tuam. utinam tales eorum causas crebras sic audias et facinora eorum atque insana pertinacia sic saepe prodatur eademque publicata gesta in omnium notitiam perferantur! quod autem scripsit eximietas tua dubitare te, utrum in Theoprepia debeas eadem gesta iubere proponi, fiat, si potest illuc frequens confluere multitudo; alioquin alius locus celebrior prouidendus est, non tamen ullo modo praetermittendum.

### English translation (Claude)

I am eagerly awaiting the records that Your Excellence promised, and I long to have them read out without delay in the church of Hippo and, if it can be done, in all the churches established in the diocese too, so that people may hear and fully recognize the confessors of wickedness, not as repentance was wrung from them by the fear of God, but as judicial diligence laid open the hardness of most cruel hearts: whether of those who [confessed] to the murder and to the blinding and maiming of the presbyter's body …, or of those who did not dare to deny that they could have known these things, though they said they disapproved of them, while they shun Catholic peace, as if to avoid being polluted by the crimes of others, and remain in that sacrilege of schism among so great a multitude of men guilty of such monstrous crimes; or even of those who said that they would not leave it even when the Catholic truth and the perversity of the Donatists had been demonstrated to them. It is no light thing that God has willed to be done through your work. Would that you might often hear such cases of theirs in this way, and that their crimes and insane obstinacy might often be exposed like this, and that those same records, once published, might be brought to the knowledge of all! As for what Your Eminence wrote, that you are in doubt whether you should order these records to be posted in the Theoprepia, let it be done if a large crowd can gather there; otherwise a more frequented place must be provided, but it must by no means be omitted.

### Translation notes

- Letter 139 is to Marcellinus. The digital text has a row of dots after "corpore", marking a gap; the verb ("confessed") is supplied in brackets by sense. The Theoprepia was evidently a public building or church in Carthage used by the Donatists (uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 139.1 (CSEL 44:148–150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-1).

## Letter 139.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-2
- Source: CSEL 44:150–152
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine again asks that the Donatist murderers not be executed, reports the Donatist bishop Macrobius's activity, and cites an imperial precedent of clemency.

### Latin text

Poena sane illorum quamuis de tantis sceleribus confessorum rogo te ut praeter supplicium mortis sit et propter conscientiam nostram et propter catholicam mansuetudinem commendandam. ipse enim fructus ad nos peruenit confessionis illorum, quia inuenit ecclesia catholica, ubi suam erga atrocissimos inimicos seruet atque exhibeat lenitatem. in tanta quippe crudelitate, quaecumque praeter sanguinem uindicta processerit, magna lenitas apparebit. quod etsi modo quibusdam nostris illa atrocitate commotis uidetur indignum et quasi dissolutionis et neglegentiae simile, transactis tamen motibus animorum, qui recentioribus factis solent turbulentius excitari, egregie luculenta bonitas apparebit et ob hoc magis eadem gesta legere atque ostendere delectabit, domine merito insignis multumque carissime ac desiderantissime fili. ibi est sanctus frater et coepiscopus meus Bonifatius et per diaconum Peregrinum, qui cum illo perrexit, commonitorium direxi; sic habe tamquam praesentiam meam et, quod uobis in commune pro ecclesiae utilitate placuerit, hoc adiuuante domino fiat, qui potens est misericorditer opitulari in tantis malis. modo Macrobius, episcopus eorum, stipatus cuneis perditorum utriusque sexus hac atque illac circuit, aperuit sibi basilicas, quas possessorum quantuluscumque timor clauserat. praesente autem procuratore uiri clarissimi Celeris Spondeo, quem tuae dilectioni commendaui multumque commendo, utcumque eorum frangebatur audacia. nunc uero, posteaquam Carthaginem profectus est, etiam in fundis ipsius basilicas aperuit, populos congregat. cum ipso est etiam ille Donatus, diaconus rebaptizatus, cum fuerit colonus ecclesiae, qui uersatus est in illa caede praecipuus. qui tales non cum eo sunt, quando et ille cum ipso est? si pro consule uel simul ambo in illos estis sententiam prolaturi et forte ille persistit uelle gladio uindicare, quamquam sit Christianus et, quantum aduertere potuimus, non sit ad haec cruenta procliuis, tamen, si necesse fuerit, etiam gestis iubete allegari epistulas meas, quas de hac re singulas nobis mittendas putaui. soleo enim audire in potestate esse iudicis mollire sententiam et mitius uindicare quam leges. si autem nec litteris meis ad hoc consenserit, hoc saltem praestet, ut in custodiam recipiantur. atque hoc de clementia imperatorum impetrare curauimus, ne passiones seruorum dei, quae debent esse in ecclesia gloriosae, inimicorum sanguine dehonestentur. scio enim in causa clericorum Anaunensium, qui occisi a gentilibus nunc martyres honorantur, imperatorem rogatum facile concessisse, ne illi, qui eos occiderant et capti iam tenebantur, poena simili punirentur.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the punishment of those men, although they have confessed to such great crimes, I ask you to let it stop short of the penalty of death, both for the sake of our conscience and to commend Catholic gentleness. For this very fruit of their confession comes to us: that the Catholic Church finds an occasion to keep and display her mildness toward her most savage enemies. For amid such cruelty, whatever punishment proceeds short of blood will appear great mildness. And although this now seems unworthy to some of our people, stirred by that atrocity, and like slackness and negligence, yet when the emotions have passed that are usually roused more violently by recent deeds, the goodness will appear outstandingly brilliant, and for this reason it will give all the more pleasure to read and show those records, my lord, deservedly distinguished and most dear and longed-for son. My holy brother and fellow bishop Boniface is there, and I have sent a memorandum by the deacon Peregrinus, who went with him; regard it as my presence, and whatever you jointly decide for the benefit of the church, let it be done with the help of the Lord, who is able to give merciful help in such great evils. Just now Macrobius, their bishop, surrounded by bands of lost men of both sexes, is going round here and there, and has opened for himself the basilicas which the fear of the landowners, such as it was, had closed. While Spondeus, the agent of the most illustrious Celer, whom I commended and do strongly commend to your love, was present, their boldness was somehow broken; but now, since he has left for Carthage, he has opened basilicas even on Celer's own estates and is gathering congregations. With him also is that Donatus, a rebaptized deacon, though he was a tenant of the church, who was the chief participant in that murder. Who of that sort is not with him, when even he is with him? If the proconsul, or both of you together, are to pronounce sentence on them, and perhaps he persists in wishing to punish with the sword (although he is a Christian and, as far as we could observe, not inclined to such bloodshed), nevertheless, if it is necessary, order my letters, which I thought fit to send one to each of you on this matter, to be entered also in the records. For I often hear that it is in the judge's power to soften the sentence and to punish more mildly than the laws. But if he will not consent to this even with my letters, let him at least grant that they be taken into custody. And we have taken care to obtain this from the clemency of the emperors: that the sufferings of the servants of God, which ought to be glorious in the church, should not be dishonored by the blood of their enemies. For I know that in the case of the clerics of Anaunia, who were killed by pagans and are now honored as martyrs, the emperor, when asked, readily granted that those who had killed them and were already held captive should not be punished with a like penalty.

### Translation notes

- The proconsul is Apringius (Letter 134). The clerics of Anaunia (Val di Non, near Trent) were Sisinnius, Martyrius, and Alexander, killed by pagans in 397. Augustine's requests concern sentences in the civil courts; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 139.2 (CSEL 44:150–152; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-2).

## Letter 139.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-3
- Source: CSEL 44:152–153
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains his delay in revising his books on infant baptism by listing his urgent writings: the summary of the conference with the Donatists, letters to the Donatist laity, to Marcellinus and Volusian, and a book for Honoratus.

### Latin text

Libros de baptismo paruulorum, cum iam codicem ipsum praestantiae tuae misissem, cur abs te rursus acceperim, oblitus sum, nisi forte, cum inspicerem, mendosos eos repperi et emendare uolui, quod mirabiliter impeditus adhuc usque non feci. epistulam quoque ad te scribendam et his adiungendam, quam, cum ibi essem, iam dictare coeperam, paulo addito sic esse inperfectam scias. si autem rationem omnium dierum et lucubrationum aliis necessitatibus inpensarum tibi possem reddere, grauiter contristatus mirareris, quanta me distendant, quae differri omnino non possunt, nec agere illa permittant, in quae me petendo et admonendo urgues uolentem et ineffabiliter, quia non possum, dolentem. cum enim ab eorum hominum necessitatibus aliquantulum uaco, qui me sic angariant, ut eos nullo modo liceat euitare nec contemnere oporteat, non desunt, quae dictanda praepono sic in articulis temporum constituta, ut dilationem non ferant, sicut mihi fuit breuiatio gestorum conlationis nostrae satis operosa, cum uiderem neminem se uelle tanto aggeri litterarum legendo committere, sicut mihi fuit etiam epistula ad ipsos laicos Donatistas de hac eadem conlatione nostra, quam modo aliquot lucubrationibus terminaui, sicut epistulae duae non breues, una ad dilectionem tuam, altera ad uirum inlustrem Volusianum, quas uos accepisse iam credo, sicut nunc in manibus habeo librum ad Honoratum nostrum de quaestionibus quibusdam quinque, quas mihi proposuit et per litteras intimauit, cui non continuo respondere uides quam minime oporteat. caritas enim, quae tamquam nutrix fouet filios suos, non ordine amandi sed ordine subueniendi infirmiores fortioribus anteponit, quos tales uult esse, quales iam illi sunt, quos non contemnendo sed de his confidendo interim praeterit. tales ergo mihi necessitates dictandi aliquid, quod me ab eis dictationibus impediat, quibus magis inardesco, deesse non possunt, cum paululum spatii uix datur inter aceruos occupationum, quibus nos alienae uel cupiditates uel necessitates angariatos trahunt, et, quid faciam, prorsus nescio.

### English translation (Claude)

Why I received back from you the books on the baptism of little ones, when I had already sent that very volume to Your Excellence, I have forgotten, unless perhaps, on looking at them, I found them full of errors and wished to correct them, which, being wonderfully hindered, I have not done to this day. As for the letter that I was to write to you and add to them, which I had already begun to dictate when I was there, know that it is still unfinished, with only a little added. If I could give you an account of all the days and nights of work spent on other necessities, you would be deeply saddened and would wonder how many things pull me apart which cannot possibly be put off, and which do not allow me to do the things to which you urge me by your requests and admonitions: I am willing, and I grieve unspeakably that I cannot. For when I am a little free from the needs of those people who press me into service in such a way that I can by no means avoid them and must not despise them, there is no lack of things to dictate which I put first, being so placed at critical moments that they bear no delay: such as the summary of the records of our conference, which was laborious enough for me, when I saw that no one was willing to commit himself to reading so great a heap of documents; such as the letter to the Donatist laity themselves about this same conference of ours, which I have just finished after some nights of work; such as two letters, not short ones, one to Your Love, the other to the illustrious Volusian, which I believe you have already received; such as the book I now have in hand for our Honoratus on certain five questions which he put to me and conveyed by letter, to whom you see how little fitting it would be not to reply at once. For love, which like a nurse cherishes her children, puts the weaker before the stronger, not in the order of loving but in the order of helping, wishing them to be such as those already are whom it passes over for the time, not out of contempt but out of confidence in them. So I cannot lack such necessities of dictating something that keeps me from the dictations for which I burn more, when scarcely a little space is given amid the heaps of occupations into which the desires or the needs of others drag us, pressed into service; and what to do I simply do not know.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 2:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The "books on the baptism of little ones" are De peccatorum meritis et remissione et de baptismo paruulorum (411–412). The conference is the Conference of Carthage (411); the summary is the Breviculus collationis; the letter to the Donatist laity is Ad Donatistas post collationem; the book for Honoratus is Letter 140. 1 Thess 2:7 (love as a nurse).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 139.3 (CSEL 44:152–153; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-3).

## Letter 139.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-4
- Source: CSEL 44:153–155
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Marcellinus's prayers, commends the church of Numidia and Bishop Delphinus, and recommends Rufinus of Cirta.

### Latin text

Audisti, unde mecum dominum depreceris; sed etiam quod tam instanter et tam crebro me admones, nolo cesses non nihil agens. commendo etiam ego excellentiae tuae ecclesiam in Numidia constitutam, propter cuius necessitates sanctus frater et coepiscopus meus Delphinus a fratribus et coepiscopis meis ibi conlaborantibus et compericlitantibus missus est. nec de hac re plura scribo, cum ipsum praesentem sis auditurus. cetera in commonitoriis inuenies, quae ad presbyterum misi siue modo siue per diaconum Peregrinum, ne mihi ea totiens iterare necesse sit. semper in Christo cor tuum uigeat et gaudeat, domine merito insignis multumque carissime ac desiderantissime fili. filium nostrum Rufinum, Cirtensem principalem, commendo eximietati tuae.

### English translation (Claude)

You have heard on what account you should pray to the Lord with me; but I do not want you to stop admonishing me so urgently and so often, for you accomplish something by it. I too commend to Your Excellency the church established in Numidia, for whose needs my holy brother and fellow bishop Delphinus has been sent by my brothers and fellow bishops who labor and share the dangers there. I do not write more on this matter, since you will hear him in person. The rest you will find in the memoranda which I sent to the presbyter, either now or by the deacon Peregrinus, so that I need not repeat them so often. May your heart ever flourish and rejoice in Christ, my lord, deservedly distinguished and most dear and longed-for son. I commend to Your Eminence our son Rufinus, a leading citizen of Cirta.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 139.4 (CSEL 44:153–155; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-139-4).

## Letter 140.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-1
- Source: CSEL 44:155–156
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his reply to Honoratus's five questions, proposing to treat them together in one continuous discussion.

### Latin text

Quinque mihi proposuisti pertractandas quaestiones atque soluendas, dilectissime mi frater Honorate, hinc inde raptas, sicut te uel legentem mouere uel cogitanti tibi in mentem uenire potuerunt, et in conspectum meum fusas quodam modo. quarum solutionem si uelim disserendo ordinare, non ut carptim, sicut propositae sunt, de singulis disseram, sed uno quodam tenore sermonis eas inter se conectam atque contexam. difficile opus uidetur. et tamen puto facilius eas solui, si hoc fecero. inuicem quippe adiuuabunt, si altera pendebit ex altera, donec omnes ueniant in seriem disputationis non singillatim separatis locis, quasi unaquaeque in sua priuata intentione habitet, sed unum aliquid intuentes et unum conlaborantes sociali ratione et indiuidua ueritate.

### English translation (Claude)

You have put to me five questions to be discussed and resolved, my dearest brother Honoratus, snatched from here and there, as they could trouble you while reading or come to mind as you were thinking, and as it were poured out before me. If I wish to arrange their solution in a discussion, so as not to treat each one piecemeal, as they were put, but to connect and weave them together in one continuous discourse, the task seems difficult. And yet I think they will be more easily resolved if I do this. For they will help one another if one hangs on the other, until all come into the sequence of the discussion, not singly in separate places, as if each dwelt in its own private aim, but looking to one thing and working together for one thing, by a shared reasoning and an undivided truth.

### Translation notes

- Letter 140, to Honoratus, is also known as the book "On the Grace of the New Testament" (Retractations 2.36).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.1 (CSEL 44:155–156; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-1).

## Letter 140.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-2
- Source: CSEL 44:156
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The five questions are Christ's cry of forsakenness, the breadth and length and height and depth, the five foolish and wise virgins, the outer darkness, and the Word made flesh; Augustine adds a sixth, the grace of the New Testament.

### Latin text

Voluisti ergo et scripto commonuisti exponi atque aperiri tibi, quid sibi uelit uox illa domini: Deus meus, deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? et quid sit, quod ait apostolus: Ut in caritate radicati et fundati praeualeatis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, et quae sint quinque uirgines stultae quaeue sapientes et quae sint tenebrae exteriores et quo modo intellegendum sit: Verbum dei caro factum est. hae sunt certe quinque tam breuiter a me commemoratae quam abs te propositae quaestiones. proinde, si placet, addamus et sextam et illud potissimum requiramus, quae sit gratia testamenti noui. hanc illae omnes intueantur et in hanc, ut opportune quaeque potuerit, opus suum conferat nobis non eo scilicet ordine, quo eas et tu proposuisti et ego recolui, sed unaquaeque cum fuerit necessaria, uelut uocata respondeat et officium sui operis impleat. ergo ita nascatur exordium.

### English translation (Claude)

You wished, then, and asked in writing, to have explained and opened to you what that cry of the Lord means: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"; and what the apostle means when he says, "that rooted and grounded in love you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth"; and who the five foolish virgins are, and who the wise; and what the outer darkness is; and how "The Word of God was made flesh" is to be understood. These are certainly the five questions, mentioned by me as briefly as they were put by you. Therefore, if you agree, let us add a sixth and inquire above all into this: what the grace of the New Testament is. Let all those questions look to this one, and let each, as opportunely as it can, contribute its work to us toward it, not of course in the order in which you put them and I have recalled them, but let each, when it is needed, answer as if called and fulfil the duty of its work. So let the beginning arise thus.

### Scripture references

- Matt 27:46: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:30: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 27:46 (Ps 22:1); Eph 3:17–18; Matt 25:1–13; Matt 8:12, 22:13, 25:30; John 1:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.2 (CSEL 44:156; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-2).

## Letter 140.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-3
- Source: CSEL 44:156–157
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Human life begins entangled in the senses, but at the age of reason one can, helped by God, choose the inner life whose happiness is eternal; the soul stands between the body and its Creator.

### Latin text

Est quaedam uita hominis carnalibus sensibus implicata, gaudiis carnalibus dedita, carnalem fugitans offensionem uoluptatemque consectans. huius uitae felicitas temporalis est, ab hac uita incipere necessitatis est, in ea persistere uoluntatis. in hac quippe ex utero matris infans funditur, huius offensiones, quantum potest, refugit, huius appetit uoluptates, nihil amplius ualet. sed posteaquam uenerit in aetatem, qua in eo rationis usus euigilet, poterit adiuta diuinitus uoluntate eligere alteram uitam, cuius in mente gaudium est, cuius interna atque aeterna felicitas. inest quippe homini anima rationalis, sed interest, eiusdem rationis usum quonam potius uoluntate conuertat, utrum ad bona exterioris et inferioris an ad bona interioris superiorisque naturae, id est, utrum ut fruatur corpore et tempore, an ut fruatur diuinitate atque aeternitate. in quadam quippe medietate posita est infra se habens corporalem creaturam supra se autem sui et corporis creatorem.

### English translation (Claude)

There is a certain human life entangled in the bodily senses, given over to bodily joys, shunning bodily harm and pursuing pleasure. The happiness of this life is temporal; to begin with this life is a matter of necessity, to remain in it a matter of will. For into this life the infant is poured out from its mother's womb; it shuns its harms as much as it can, seeks its pleasures, and can do nothing more. But after it has come to the age at which the use of reason awakens in it, it will be able, with its will helped by God, to choose the other life, whose joy is in the mind, whose happiness is inward and eternal. For there is in a human being a rational soul; but it matters to what it chooses rather to turn the use of that reason by its will: whether to the goods of the outer and lower nature or to the goods of the inner and higher; that is, whether to enjoy the body and time, or to enjoy the Godhead and eternity. For the soul is placed in a kind of middle position, having bodily creation below it, and above it the creator of itself and of the body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.3 (CSEL 44:156–157; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-3).

## Letter 140.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-4
- Source: CSEL 44:157–158
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The soul uses temporal goods well when it keeps them in order beneath eternal ones; even when it uses goods badly, God uses evil well and orders sinners justly in punishment.

### Latin text

Potest igitur anima rationalis etiam temporali et corporali felicitate bene uti, si non se dedent creaturae creatore neglecto, sed eam potius felicitatem fecerit seruire creatori, qui et ipsam suae bonitatis abundantissima largitate donauit. sicut enim bona sunt omnia, quae creauit deus, ab ipsa rationali creatura usque ad infimum corpus, ita bene in his agit anima rationalis, si ordinem seruet et distinguendo, eligendo, pendendo subdat minora maioribus, corporalia spiritalibus, inferiora superioribus, temporalia sempiternis, ne superiorum neglectu et appetitu inferiorum, quoniam hinc fit ipsa deterior, et se et corpus suum mittat in peius, sed potius ordinata caritate se et corpus suum conuertat in melius. cum enim sint omnes substantiae naturaliter bonae, ordo in eis laudatus honoratur, peruersitas culpata damnatur. nec efficit anima peruerse utens creaturis, ut ordinationem effugiat creatoris, quoniam, si illa male utitur bonis, ille bene utitur etiam malis ac per hoc illa peruerse bonis utendo fit mala, ille ordinate etiam malis utendo permanet bonus. qui enim iniuste se ordinat in peccatis, iuste ordinatur in poenis.

### English translation (Claude)

The rational soul, then, can use even temporal and bodily happiness well, if it does not give itself to the creature, neglecting the creator, but rather makes that happiness serve the creator, who has given it too by the most abundant generosity of his goodness. For just as all things that God created are good, from the rational creature itself down to the lowest body, so the rational soul acts well among them if it keeps order and, by distinguishing, choosing, and weighing, subordinates lesser things to greater, bodily to spiritual, lower to higher, temporal to everlasting, so that it may not, by neglecting the higher and desiring the lower (for by this it becomes worse itself), send both itself and its body to something worse, but rather by ordered love turn itself and its body to something better. For since all substances are naturally good, order in them is praised and honored, perversity is blamed and condemned. Nor does the soul, by using creatures perversely, escape the ordering of the creator; for if it uses good things badly, he uses even bad things well; and so the soul, by using good things perversely, becomes bad, while he, by using even bad things in an orderly way, remains good. For he who unjustly orders himself in sins is justly ordered in punishments.

### Scripture references

- Gen 1:31: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 1:31 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.4 (CSEL 44:157–158; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-4).

## Letter 140.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-5
- Source: CSEL 44:158
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God gave the Old Testament with its earthly promises to show that temporal goods too are his gifts, but the saints of old belonged to the New Testament, which was hidden in figures.

### Latin text

Volens itaque deus ostendere etiam terrenam temporalemque felicitatem suum donum esse nec aliunde nisi ab ipso sperari oportere prioribus saeculi temporibus dispensandum iudicauit testamentum uetus, quod pertineret ad hominem ueterem, a quo ista uita necesse est incipiat. sed illae felicitates patrum dei beneficio concessae praedicantur quamuis ad istam uitam transitoriam pertinentes. illa quippe terrena munera in manifesto promittebantur et tribuebantur; in occulto autem illis omnibus rebus nouum testamentum figurate praenuntiabatur et capiebatur intellegentia paucorum, quos eadem gratia prophetico munere dignos fecerat. dispensabant ergo illi sancti pro congruentia temporis testamentum uetus, pertinebant uero ad testamentum nouum. nam et quando temporalem felicitatem agebant, aeternam ueram et praeferendam intellegebant et istam ministrabant in mysterio, ut illam consequerentur in praemio. et si quando patiebantur aduersa, ad hoc patiebantur, ut euidentissimo diuino adiutorio liberati glorificarent deum bonorum omnium largitorem non solum sempiternorum, quae pie sperabant, uerum etiam temporalium, quae prophetice gubernabant.

### English translation (Claude)

God, therefore, wishing to show that even earthly and temporal happiness is his gift and must be hoped for from no other source but him, judged that in the earlier times of the world the Old Testament should be dispensed, which belonged to the old man, with whom this life must begin. But those prosperities of the fathers are proclaimed to have been granted by God's kindness, although they belonged to this transitory life. For those earthly gifts were promised and given openly; but hiddenly, in all those things, the New Testament was foretold figuratively, and it was grasped by the understanding of a few, whom the same grace had made worthy of the prophetic gift. Those saints, then, dispensed the Old Testament in keeping with the time, but they belonged to the New Testament. For even when they enjoyed temporal happiness, they understood eternal happiness to be the true one and to be preferred, and they administered this one as a mystery so as to attain that one as a reward. And if ever they suffered adversity, they suffered it for this purpose: that, delivered by most evident divine help, they might glorify God as the giver of all good things, not only of the everlasting ones, which they devoutly hoped for, but also of the temporal ones, which they governed prophetically.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:6: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The "old man": Rom 6:6; Eph 4:22 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.5 (CSEL 44:158; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-5).

## Letter 140.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-6
- Source: CSEL 44:158–159
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In the fullness of time God sent his Son, the eternal Word through whom all was made, who is present everywhere though the darkness of the ungodly does not grasp him.

### Latin text

Cum autem uenit plenitudo temporis, ut gratia, quae occultabatur in uetere testamento, iam reuelaretur in nouo, misit deus filium suum factum ex muliere, quo nomine proprietate Hebraicae linguae omnis femina nuncupatur sine uiro intacta siue iam mixta. quem autem filium miserit fierique ex muliere uoluerit, quantus ille deus sit, qui hanc humilitatem pro salute fidelium suscipere dignatus fuerit, ut agnoscas, nunc adtende euangelium: In principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum; hoc erat in principio apud deum. omnia per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil, quod factum est. in ipso uita erat et uita erat lux hominum et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt. hic ergo deus, uerbum dei, per quod facta sunt omnia, filius dei est incommutabiliter manens, ubique praesens, nullo clausus loco nec partiliter per cuncta diffusus, tamquam minorem partem habeat in minore loco et in maiore maiorem, sed ubique totus atque ita non absens etiam mentibus impiorum, quamuis eum non uideant, sicut nec ista lux uidetur oculis praesentata caecorum. lucet ergo et in tenebris talibus, quales apostolus significat, ubi dicit: Fuistis enim aliquando tenebrae, nunc autem lux in domino; sed eam tales tenebrae non comprehenderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But when the fullness of time came, so that the grace which was hidden in the Old Testament might now be revealed in the New, God sent his Son, made of a woman (by which name, in the idiom of the Hebrew language, every female is called, whether untouched by a man or already joined to one). But so that you may recognize what Son he sent and willed to be made of a woman, how great a God he is who deigned to take on this lowliness for the salvation of the faithful, now listen to the Gospel: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men; and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it." This God, then, the Word of God, through whom all things were made, is the Son of God, remaining unchangeably, present everywhere, enclosed in no place, nor spread out part by part through all things, as though he had a smaller part in a smaller place and a larger in a larger, but whole everywhere; and so he is not absent even from the minds of the ungodly, although they do not see him, just as this light is not seen by the eyes of the blind when it is present to them. He shines, then, even in such darkness as the apostle means when he says, "For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord"; but such darkness did not comprehend it.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:4: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 4:4; John 1:1–5; Eph 5:8. The remark that "woman" in Hebrew idiom does not imply loss of virginity bears on Mary's virginity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.6 (CSEL 44:158–159; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-6).

## Letter 140.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-7
- Source: CSEL 44:159–160
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: John the Baptist, the greatest born of women, bore witness that Christ is God; John was a lamp lit by participation, while Christ is the light itself.

### Latin text

Suscepit itaque hominem, quem uidere homines poterant, ut sanati per fidem postea uiderent, quod tunc uidere non poterant. sed ne homo Christus eo ipso, quo uisibiliter apparebat, non crederetur et deus tantumque illi tribueretur quantum homini excellentissimae gratiae atque sapientiae, ideo fuit homo missus a deo, cui nomen erat Iohannes. hic uenit, ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine, ut omnes crederent per eum. non erat ille lumen, sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine. tantus enim homo debuit perhibere testimonium de illo, qui non tantum homo uerum etiam deus erat, ut in natis mulierum nemo exsurgeret maior Iohanne Baptista; sic enim ille, cui maior Iohannes testimonium perhibebat, intellegeretur hoc esse maior, quo non tantum homo sed etiam deus erat. lumen ergo et Iohannes sed tale lumen, quale testimonium perhibet ipse dominus dicens: Ille erat lucerna ardens et lucens, quod et discipulis suis dixit: Vos estis lumen mundi; atque ut ostenderet quale lumen, secutus adiunxit: Nemo accendit lucernam et ponit eam sub modio sed super candelabrum, ut luceat omnibus, qui in domo sunt; sic luceat lumen uestrum coram hominibus. istae similitudines datae sunt, ut, quantum possumus, intellegamus uel, si hoc nondum possumus, sine ulla dubitatione credamus animam rationalem non esse naturam dei — illa quippe incommutabilis est —, sed tamen eam posse participando inluminari; lucernae quippe accendi indigent et extingui possunt. ideo, quod dicitur de Iohanne: Non erat ille lumen, ad illud respicitur lumen, quod non participatione inluminatur, sed eius participatione inluminantur, quae ab illo inluminantur.

### English translation (Claude)

He took, then, a man whom human beings could see, so that, healed through faith, they might afterward see what they could not see then. But lest the man Christ, by the very fact that he appeared visibly, should not be believed to be God as well, and only so much be attributed to him as to a man of most excellent grace and wisdom, therefore "there was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came to bear witness concerning the light, that all might believe through him. He was not the light, but came to bear witness concerning the light." For so great a man had to bear witness concerning him who was not only man but also God, that among those born of women none should arise greater than John the Baptist; for so he to whom the greater John bore witness would be understood to be greater in this, that he was not only man but also God. John too, then, was a light, but such a light as the Lord himself bears witness to when he says, "He was a burning and shining lamp"; which he said also to his disciples: "You are the light of the world"; and to show what kind of light, he went on to add: "No one lights a lamp and puts it under a bushel, but on a lampstand, so that it may shine for all who are in the house; so let your light shine before men." These comparisons were given so that we may understand as far as we can, or, if we cannot yet, may believe without any doubt, that the rational soul is not the nature of God (for that nature is unchangeable), but that it can nevertheless be enlightened by participation; for lamps need to be lit and can be put out. Therefore what is said of John, "He was not the light," refers to that light which is not enlightened by participation, but by participation in which are enlightened all things that are enlightened by it.

### Scripture references

- John 1:6: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:11: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:35: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:6–8; Matt 11:11; John 5:35; Matt 5:14–16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.7 (CSEL 44:159–160; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-7).

## Letter 140.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-8
- Source: CSEL 44:160–161
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ is the true light that enlightens every man, including John; the 'world' that did not know him means unbelievers.

### Latin text

Denique sequitur: Erat lumen uerum, et tamquam quaereremus, quo modo discerneretur lumen uerum a lumine inluminato, id est Christus a Iohanne: Erat, inquit, lumen uerum, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum. si omnem hominem, ergo et Iohannem. atque ut magis ostendat huius diuinitatem longe praestantiore distantia: In hoc mundo, inquit, erat et mundus per eum factus est et mundus eum non cognouit. non mundus, qui per eum factus est, eum non cognouit, neque enim habet uim cognoscendi eum nisi rationalis creatura, quamuis etiam mundus iste uisibilis per eum factus sit, hoc est caelum et terra, sed mundum non cognoscentem increpando significauit infideles constitutos in mundo.

### English translation (Claude)

Then follows: "He was the true light"; and as if we were asking how the true light was to be distinguished from an enlightened light, that is, Christ from John, he says: "He was the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world." If every man, then John too. And to show his divinity still more by a far greater distance, he says: "He was in this world, and the world was made through him, and the world did not know him." It was not the world that was made through him that did not know him; for only a rational creature has the power to know him, although this visible world too, that is, heaven and earth, was made through him; but by rebuking the world that did not know him he meant the unbelievers set in the world.

### Scripture references

- John 1:9: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:9–10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.8 (CSEL 44:160–161; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-8).

## Letter 140.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-9
- Source: CSEL 44:161
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who received Christ were given power to become children of God by spiritual birth; this is the grace of the New Testament, hidden in the Old.

### Latin text

Deinde adiungit: In sua propria uenit et sui eum non receperunt, siue quia et ipsi infideles, in quantum homines sunt, eius sunt, per quem creati sunt, siue suos proprie Iudaeos intellegi uoluit, ex quibus naturam carnis adsumpsit. nec tamen omnes eum non receperunt; sequitur enim et dicit: Quotquot autem receperunt eum, dedit eis potestatem filios dei fieri credentibus in nomine eius, qui non ex sanguinibus neque ex uoluntate carnis neque ex uoluntate uiri sed ex deo nati sunt. haec est gratia noui testamenti, quod in uetere latuit nec tamen figuris obumbrantibus prophetari praenuntiarique cessauit, ut intellegat anima deum suum et gratia eius renascatur illi. haec quippe natiuitas spiritalis est, ideo non ex sanguinibus, non ex uoluntate uiri nec ex uoluntate carnis sed ex deo.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he adds: "He came to his own, and his own did not receive him"; either because even unbelievers, in so far as they are human beings, are his, through whom they were created, or he wished his own to be understood properly as the Jews, from whom he took the nature of flesh. Yet not all failed to receive him; for he goes on to say: "But as many as received him, he gave them power to become sons of God, to those who believe in his name, who were born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God." This is the grace of the New Testament, which lay hidden in the Old, and yet did not cease to be prophesied and foretold by overshadowing figures, so that the soul may understand its God and be reborn to him by his grace. For this birth is spiritual; therefore it is not of blood, nor of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God.

### Scripture references

- John 1:11: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:11–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.9 (CSEL 44:161; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-9).

## Letter 140.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-10
- Source: CSEL 44:161–162
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Our sonship is by adoption: the Son of God became son of man so that we, remaining human, might share his nature and become sons of God.

### Latin text

Haec etiam adoptio uocatur. eramus enim aliquid ante, quam essemus filii dei, et accepimus beneficium, ut fieremus, quod non eramus, sicut, qui adoptatur, ante, quam adoptaretur, nondum erat filius eius, a quo adoptatur, iam tamen erat, qui adoptaretur. et ab hac generatione gratiae discernitur ille filius, qui, cum esset filius dei, uenit, ut fieret filius hominis donaretque nobis, qui eramus filii hominis, filios dei fieri. factus est quippe ille, quod non erat, sed tamen aliud aliquid erat et hoc ipsum aliquid uerbum dei erat, per quod facta sunt omnia, et lumen uerum, quod inluminat omnem hominem, et deus apud deum. nos quoque per eius gratiam facti sumus, quod non eramus, id est filii dei; sed tamen aliquid eramus et hoc ipsum aliquid multo inferius, hoc est filii hominum. descendit ergo ille, ut nos ascenderemus, et manens in sua natura factus est particeps naturae nostrae, ut et nos manentes in natura nostra efficeremur participes naturae ipsius, non tamen sic; nam illum naturae nostrae participatio non fecit deteriorem, nos autem facit naturae illius participatio meliores.

### English translation (Claude)

This is also called adoption. For we were something before we were sons of God, and we received the kindness of becoming what we were not; just as one who is adopted, before he was adopted, was not yet the son of the one who adopts him, yet he already existed to be adopted. And from this generation by grace that Son is distinguished who, though he was the Son of God, came to become the son of man and to grant us, who were sons of man, to become sons of God. For he became what he was not, yet he was something else, and this very something was the Word of God, through whom all things were made, and the true light which enlightens every man, and God with God. We too by his grace have become what we were not, that is, sons of God; but we were something, and this very something far lower, that is, sons of men. He therefore came down so that we might go up, and remaining in his own nature he became a sharer in our nature, so that we too, remaining in our nature, might become sharers in his nature; yet not in the same way: for sharing in our nature did not make him worse, while sharing in his nature makes us better.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:9: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Pet 1:4: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:3, 9, 1; 2 Pet 1:4 (echo: sharers of the divine nature).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.10 (CSEL 44:161–162; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-10).

## Letter 140.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-11
- Source: CSEL 44:162–163
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ, born under the law, redeemed those under the law so that we might receive adoption; the Word made flesh shows that humans can become children of God by sharing in the Word.

### Latin text

Misit itaque deus filium suum factum ex muliere, factum sub lege. nam legis sacramenta percepit, ut eos, qui sub lege erant, redimeret, id est quos lex reos tenebat occidente littera, dum praeceptum non impleretur, antequam uiuificaret spiritus. quia caritas dei, quae praeceptum implet, diffunditur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. proinde cum dixisset: Ut eos, qui sub lege erant, redimeret, continuo subiunxit: Ut adoptionem filiorum reciperemus, ut uidelicet huius gratiam beneficii discerneret ab illa filii natura, qui missus est filius non adoptione factus sed semper genitus filius, ut participata natura filiorum hominum ad participandam etiam suam naturam adoptaret filios hominum. quapropter etiam cum dixisset: Dedit eis potestatem filios dei fieri, modumque adiunxisset, ne carnalis intellegeretur natiuitas, quod scilicet eis id praestiterit, qui credunt in nomine eius et per gratiam renascuntur spiritalem non ex sanguinibus neque ex uoluntate uiri neque ex uoluntate carnis sed ex deo, mox commendauit huius quasi uicissitudinis sacramentum. tamquam enim mirati tantum bonum non auderemus optare, statim subiunxit: Et uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis, quod unum est ex quinque illis, quae tibi exponi uoluisti, tamquam diceret: o homines! nolite desperare uos fieri posse filios dei, quia et ipse filius dei, hoc est uerbum dei caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. reddite uicem, efficimini spiritus et habitate in illo, qui caro factus est et habitauit in nobis. neque enim iam desperandum est participatione uerbi fieri posse homines filios dei, quando filius dei participatione carnis factus est filius hominis.

### English translation (Claude)

So "God sent his Son, made of a woman, made under the law"; for he received the sacraments of the law, "that he might redeem those who were under the law," that is, those whom the law held guilty, the letter killing, as long as the commandment was not fulfilled, before the Spirit gave life; because "the love of God," which fulfils the commandment, "is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us." Accordingly, when he had said, "that he might redeem those who were under the law," he at once added, "that we might receive the adoption of sons," so as to distinguish the grace of this kindness from the nature of that Son who was sent as Son, not made so by adoption but always begotten Son, so that, having shared the nature of the sons of men, he might adopt the sons of men to share his own nature too. Therefore also, when he had said, "He gave them power to become sons of God," and had added the manner, lest a bodily birth be understood, namely that he granted this to those who believe in his name and are reborn by grace, a spiritual birth, "not of blood nor of the will of man nor of the will of the flesh, but of God," he soon commended the sacrament of this as it were exchange. For as if we, amazed at so great a good, would not dare to wish for it, he immediately added: "And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us"; which is one of those five things you wanted explained to you; as if he said: O men, do not despair that you can become sons of God, since the Son of God himself, that is, the Word of God, was made flesh and dwelt among us. Return the exchange: become spirit and dwell in him who was made flesh and dwelt among us. For it is no longer to be despaired of that human beings can become sons of God by participation in the Word, when the Son of God by participation in flesh became the son of man.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:13: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 4:4–5; 2 Cor 3:6; Rom 5:5; John 1:12–14. "In nobis" is rendered "among us", as in John 1:14; Augustine's "dwell in him" plays on its sense "in us".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.11 (CSEL 44:162–163; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-11).

## Letter 140.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-12
- Source: CSEL 44:163–164
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The unchangeable Word took flesh through a rational soul, against the Apollinarians; 'flesh' means a whole man, and God and man are one person in Christ.

### Latin text

Nos itaque mutabiles in melius commutandi participes efficimur uerbi; uerbum autem incommutabile nihil in deterius commutatum particeps carnis effectum est rationali anima mediante. neque enim homo Christus, ut Apollinaristae haeretici putauerunt, aut non habuit animam aut non habuit rationalem; sed more suo scriptura, ut Christi humilitatem magis ostenderet, ne carnis nomen quasi indignum aliquid refugisse uideretur, carnem pro homine posuit. neque enim, quia scriptum est: Videbit omnis caro salutare dei, animae ibi non sunt intellegendae. nihil proinde aliud dictum est: Verbum caro factum est, quam si diceretur: Filius dei filius hominis factus est. qui cum in forma dei esset, sicut dicit apostolus, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis deo: neque enim usurpationis erat, ut rapina diceretur, sed naturae inerat, ut esset aequalis; semet ipsum tamen exinaniuit non formam dei amittens sed formam serui suscipiens; humiliauit semet ipsum factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. uide, quem ad modum eundem hominem quem deum commendat, ut persona una sit, ne non trinitas sed quaternitas inducatur. sicut enim non augetur numerus personarum, cum caro accedit animae, ut sit unus homo, sic non augetur numerus personarum, cum homo accedit uerbo, ut sit unus Christus. legitur itaque: Verbum caro factum, ut intellegamus huius personae singularitatem, non ut suspicemur in carnem mutatam diuinitatem.

### English translation (Claude)

We, then, who are changeable, are made sharers in the Word in order to be changed for the better; but the unchangeable Word, changed in no way for the worse, became a sharer in flesh by the mediation of a rational soul. For the man Christ did not, as the Apollinarian heretics thought, either have no soul or have no rational soul; but Scripture, in its usual way, to show Christ's humility more, put "flesh" for "man", lest he should seem to have shunned the word "flesh" as something unworthy. For because it is written, "All flesh shall see the salvation of God," souls are not to be understood as excluded there. So "The Word was made flesh" says nothing other than if it were said, "The Son of God was made the son of man." He, "though he was in the form of God," as the apostle says, "did not think it robbery to be equal with God" (for it was not a matter of usurpation, that it should be called robbery, but it belonged to his nature to be equal); "yet he emptied himself," not losing the form of God but "taking the form of a servant"; "he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross." See how he commends the same one as man and as God, so that there is one person, lest not a Trinity but a quaternity be introduced. For just as the number of persons is not increased when flesh is joined to soul so that there is one man, so the number of persons is not increased when a man is joined to the Word so that there is one Christ. So we read, "The Word was made flesh," that we may understand the singleness of this person, not that we may suspect the divinity was changed into flesh.

### Scripture references

- Luke 3:6: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:5: quotation, medium confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 3:6 (Isa 40:5); John 1:14; Phil 2:6–8. The Apollinarians held that the divine Word took the place of a human mind in Christ. The Christological statements are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.12 (CSEL 44:163–164; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-12).

## Letter 140.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-13
- Source: CSEL 44:164–165
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ was not commended by earthly prosperity but by suffering, so that the faithful would seek eternal rewards; Psalm 73 shows the man troubled by the prosperity of the wicked.

### Latin text

Itaque Christus homo, ut per eum reuelaretur noui gratia testamenti, quae non ad temporalem sed ad aeternam uitam pertinet, non utique terrena felicitate commendandus fuit. inde subiectio, inde passio, inde flagella, sputa, contumeliae, crux, uulnera et tamquam superato subiectoque mors ipsa, ut fideles eius discerent, quale pietatis praemium ab illo, cuius filii facti essent, petere atque sperare deberent, ne ad hoc pro magno seruiretur deo, ut terrenam felicitatem adipisci quaererent, qui seruirent ipsi, abicientes et conculcantes fidem suam aestimando eam mercede uilissima. unde beneficentissima prouidentia omnipotens deus terrenam felicitatem concessit et impiis, ne pro magno quaereretur a bonis. hinc ille psalmus septuagesimus et secundus inducit hominem paenitentem, quod aliquando corde non recto pro hac deo mercede seruierit, qua cum pollere atque excellere impios uideret, turbatus coeperat cogitare, quod deus humana non curet. et cum ab ista cogitatione eum sanctorum ad deum pertinentium reuocaret auctoritas, suscepit atque intendit agnoscere tam grande secretum, quod ei laboranti non patefactum est, donec intraret in sanctuarium dei et intellegeret in nouissima, hoc est donec accepto spiritu sancto disceret desiderare potiora et prospiceret, quae poena futura sit impiis, etiam qui faenea quadam temporaliter felicitate floruissent. hunc psalmum septuagesimum et secundum nocte, qua inlucescebat sollemnitas beatissimi Cypriani, per ministerium nostrum expositum lege et diligenter aduerte.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore the man Christ, so that the grace of the New Testament, which belongs not to temporal but to eternal life, might be revealed through him, was certainly not to be commended by earthly happiness. Hence his subjection, hence his passion, hence the scourges, the spitting, the insults, the cross, the wounds, and, as if he were overcome and subdued, death itself: so that his faithful might learn what reward of piety they ought to seek and hope for from him whose sons they had been made, lest God be served as something great in order that those who served him might seek to obtain earthly happiness, casting away and trampling on their faith by valuing it at the cheapest price. Hence almighty God, by a most beneficent providence, granted earthly happiness to the ungodly too, so that it might not be sought as something great by the good. Hence that seventy-second psalm introduces a man repenting that he had once served God with a heart not upright for this reward, and who, when he saw the ungodly flourishing and excelling in it, was disturbed and had begun to think that God does not care for human affairs. And when the authority of the saints who belong to God called him back from this thought, he undertook and set himself to understand so great a secret, which was not opened to him in his labor until he entered the sanctuary of God and understood the last things; that is, until, having received the Holy Spirit, he learned to desire better things and foresaw what punishment awaits the ungodly, even those who had flourished for a time with a kind of grassy happiness. Read this seventy-second psalm, as it was expounded through my ministry on the night before the dawning of the feast of the most blessed Cyprian, and attend to it carefully.

### Scripture references

- Ps 73:3 (72:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 73:11 (72:11 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 73:17 (72:17 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:30: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Psalm 72 in the Latin (LXX) numbering is Ps 73 in English Bibles; see Ps 73:2–3, 11, 17. Augustine's exposition is his Enarratio in Psalmum 72, preached on the eve of Cyprian's feast (14 September).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.13 (CSEL 44:164–165; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-13).

## Letter 140.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-14
- Source: CSEL 44:165–166
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In his passion Christ took up the voice of our weakness in the cry 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?', the opening of Psalm 22.

### Latin text

Proinde homo Christus idemque deus Christus, cuius misericordissima humanitate atque in cuius forma seruili discere deberemus, quid in hac uita contemnendum et quid in alia sperandum esset, in ipsa passione, in qua sibi eius inimici magni uictoresque uidebantur, suscepit uocem infirmitatis nostrae, qua simul crucifigebatur uetus homo noster, ut euacuaretur corpus peccati, et dixit: Deus, deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? et hoc unum de quinque propositis tuis. sic incipit psalmus uicesimus et primus, qui de passione ipsius et reuelatione gratiae, quam fidelibus faciendis liberandisque adtulit, in prophetia tanto ante cantatus est.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, the man Christ, who is also God Christ, from whose most merciful humanity and in whose form of a servant we were to learn what is to be despised in this life and what is to be hoped for in the other, in the very passion in which his enemies thought themselves great and victorious, took up the voice of our weakness, in which our old man was crucified together with him, so that the body of sin might be done away, and said: "God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" And this is one of your five questions. So begins the twenty-first psalm, which was sung so long before in prophecy about his passion and about the revelation of the grace that he brought for making and setting free the faithful.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:46: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 2:7; Rom 6:6; Matt 27:46; Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.14 (CSEL 44:165–166; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-14).

## Letter 140.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-15
- Source: CSEL 44:166
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ cried out Psalm 22 in the voice of his body, the church, and of human weakness, which had to be denied the goods of the Old Testament so as to learn to hope for those of the New.

### Latin text

Proinde eundem psalmum, cuius prophetiam dominus ad se pertinere demonstrans primum uersum eius exclamauit, cum penderet in ligno, commemorando exponendoque percurram, ut ex hoc intellegas, quem ad modum gratia testamenti noui nec eo tempore tacebatur, quando in uetere uelabatur. dicitur enim ex persona Christi, quod ad formam serui adtinet, in qua nostra portabatur infirmitas. dixit enim de illo et Esaias: Ille infirmitates nostras portat et pro nobis in doloribus est. ex huius igitur infirmitatis uoce, de qua Paulus in eo, quod petebat, non exauditus et ideo quodam modo derelictus audit tamen a domino: Sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam uirtus in infirmitate perficitur, ex uoce ergo huius infirmitatis nostrae, quam in se transfigurauit caput nostrum, dicitur in hoc psalmo: Deus, deus meus, respice me: quare me dereliquisti? in eo quippe derelinquitur deprecans, in quo non exauditur. hanc in se uocem transfigurauit Iesus, uocem scilicet corporis sui, hoc est ecclesiae suae a uetere homine in nouum hominem reformandae, uocem scilicet infirmitatis humanae, cui deneganda fuerant bona ueteris testamenti, ut bona noui testamenti optare atque sperare iam disceret.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, I will run through that same psalm, recalling and expounding it (the psalm whose first verse the Lord cried out as he hung on the tree, showing that its prophecy referred to him), so that you may understand from it how the grace of the New Testament was not kept silent even at the time when it was veiled in the Old. For it is spoken in the person of Christ as regards the form of the servant, in which our weakness was carried. For Isaiah too said of him: "He carries our weaknesses and is in sorrows for us." From the voice of this weakness, then (that weakness by which Paul, not heard in what he asked and therefore in a way forsaken, nevertheless hears from the Lord: "My grace is sufficient for you; for power is made perfect in weakness"), from the voice, then, of this weakness of ours, which our head transferred to himself, it is said in this psalm: "God, my God, look upon me: why have you forsaken me?" For one who prays is forsaken in that in which he is not heard. Jesus transferred this voice to himself, namely the voice of his body, that is, of his church, which was to be reformed from the old man into the new man; the voice, namely, of human weakness, which had to be denied the goods of the Old Testament, so that it might now learn to desire and hope for the goods of the New Testament.

### Scripture references

- Isa 53:4: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:8: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:9: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:22: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 53:4 (Old Latin); 2 Cor 12:8–9; Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX, which adds "look upon me"); Eph 4:22–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.15 (CSEL 44:166; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-15).

## Letter 140.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-16
- Source: CSEL 44:166–167
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Above all people desire to prolong this life; even the devout, though longing to be with Christ, shrink from death and wish to be clothed with immortality without dying.

### Latin text

In illis autem ueteris testamenti bonis ad ueterem hominem pertinentibus praecipue concupiscitur uitae huius productio temporalis, ut aliquanto diutius teneatur, quia semper non potest. ideo mortis diem omnes quidem adfuturum sciunt et eum tamen omnes aut paene omnes differre conantur, etiam qui post mortem se beatius credunt esse uicturos; tantam habet uim carnis et animae dulce consortium. nemo enim umquam carnem suam odio habuit et propterea non uult anima uel ad tempus ab eius etiam infirmitate discedere, quamuis eam se sine infirmitate in aeternum recepturam esse confidat. proinde mente seruiens legi dei carne autem trahens desideria peccati, quibus oboedire uetat apostolus, mentis quidem ratione concupiscit homo pius dissolui et esse cum Christo, sed id sensu carnis recusat et refugit et, si fieri possit, non uult expoliari sed superuestiri, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita, id est ut ab infirmitate ad inmortalitatem etiam ipsum corpus sine morte media transferatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Among those goods of the Old Testament, belonging to the old man, what is desired above all is the temporal prolonging of this life, that it may be held somewhat longer, since it cannot be held always. Hence all know that the day of death will come, and yet all, or almost all, try to put it off, even those who believe they will live more happily after death; so great a power has the sweet fellowship of flesh and soul. For no one ever hated his own flesh; and therefore the soul does not wish to depart even for a time from its flesh, even from its weakness, although it is confident that it will receive it back without weakness for ever. Accordingly, serving the law of God with the mind but drawing with the flesh the desires of sin, which the apostle forbids us to obey, the devout man by the reason of his mind desires to be dissolved and to be with Christ, but by the feeling of the flesh he refuses and shrinks from it, and, if it were possible, he does not wish to be stripped but to be clothed over, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life, that is, so that the body itself may be transferred from weakness to immortality without death between.

### Scripture references

- Eph 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 5:29; Rom 7:25; Rom 6:12; Phil 1:23; 2 Cor 5:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.16 (CSEL 44:166–167; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-16).

## Letter 140.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-17
- Source: CSEL 44:167–168
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The desire for longer life is called 'the words of my sins', far from the salvation promised by the New Testament; the verse can be punctuated in two ways.

### Latin text

Sed haec uerba, quibus humanus dies et uitae huius prolixitas concupiscitur, uerba sunt delictorum et longe sunt ab ea salute, cuius nondum rem sed iam spem gerimus, de qua scriptum est, quia spe salui facti sumus; spes autem quae uidetur, non est spes. ideoque et in isto psalmo cum dixisset: Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti? continuo subiungit: Longe a salute mea uerba delictorum meorum, id est haec uerba delictorum meorum sunt et longe sunt ab illa salute mea, quam mihi non ueteris sed noui testamenti gratia pollicetur. quamquam etiam sic distingui potest: Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti longe a salute mea? tamquam diceret: Relinquendo me, hoc est non me exaudiendo longe factus es a salute mea praesenti scilicet salute huius uitae, ut alius sensus sit uerba delictorum meorum, id est ista, quae dixi, uerba sunt delictorum, quia uerba sunt carnalium desideriorum.

### English translation (Claude)

But these words, by which the human day and the length of this life are desired, are words of sins, and are far from that salvation of which we do not yet hold the reality but already the hope, of which it is written that "in hope we were saved; but hope that is seen is not hope." And so in this psalm too, when he had said, "God, my God, look upon me; why have you forsaken me?" he at once adds: "Far from my salvation are the words of my sins"; that is, these are the words of my sins, and they are far from that salvation of mine which the grace not of the Old but of the New Testament promises me. Although it can also be punctuated thus: "God, my God, look upon me; why have you forsaken me, far from my salvation?", as if he said: By forsaking me, that is, by not hearing me, you have become far from my salvation, namely the present salvation of this life; so that "the words of my sins" has another sense, that is: these things I have said are words of sins, because they are words of carnal desires.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:24; Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX, Old Latin "verba delictorum meorum").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.17 (CSEL 44:167–168; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-17).

## Letter 140.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-18
- Source: CSEL 44:168–169
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ, as bridegroom one flesh with his bride the church, speaks in her voice on the cross, just as he spoke of the persecuted church as himself to Saul.

### Latin text

Haec Christus ex persona sui corporis dicit, quod est ecclesia; haec ex persona dicit infirmitatis carnis peccati, quam transfigurauit in eam, quam sumpsit ex uirgine, similitudinem carnis peccati; haec sponsus ex persona sponsae loquitur, quia uniuit eam sibi quodam modo. et apud Esaiam, ubi dicit: Sicut sponso alligauit mihi mitram et sicut sponsam ornauit me ornamento, alligauit mihi et ornauit me tamquam unius uox est et tamen sponsum et sponsam Christum intellegimus et ecclesiam. sed erunt duo in carne una. sacramentum magnum, dixit apostolus, in Christo et in ecclesia; igitur non iam duo sed una caro. si ergo caro una, profecto competenter etiam uox una. quid hic quaeris, humana infirmitas, uocem uerbi, per quod facta sunt omnia? audi potius uocem carnis, quae facta est inter omnia, quoniam uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis; audi potius medicinae uocem, qua sanaris, ut uideas deum, quem tibi uidendum distulit, hominem autem uidendum adtulit, occidendum obtulit, imitandum contulit, credendum transtulit, ut ista fide ad uidendum deum mentis oculus sanaretur. quid ergo dedignamur audire uocem corporis ex ore capitis? ecclesia in illo patiebatur, quando pro ecclesia patiebatur, sicut etiam ipse in ecclesia patiebatur, quando pro illo ecclesia patiebatur. nam sicut audiuimus ecclesiae uocem in Christo patientis: Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti? sic audiuimus etiam Christi uocem in ecclesia patientis: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris?

### English translation (Claude)

Christ says these things in the person of his body, which is the church; he says them in the person of the weakness of the flesh of sin, which he transferred to the likeness of the flesh of sin that he took from the virgin; the bridegroom speaks them in the person of the bride, because he united her to himself in a certain way. In Isaiah too, where he says, "As a bridegroom he has bound a turban on me, and as a bride he has adorned me with ornament," "he has bound on me" and "he has adorned me" are as it were the voice of one, and yet we understand the bridegroom and the bride as Christ and the church. "But they shall be two in one flesh": "a great sacrament," said the apostle, "in Christ and in the church"; therefore "no longer two, but one flesh." If then one flesh, surely, fittingly, also one voice. Why do you look here, human weakness, for the voice of the Word, through whom all things were made? Hear rather the voice of the flesh, which was made among all things, since "the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us"; hear rather the voice of the medicine by which you are healed, so that you may see God, whom he put off for you to see, but brought man for you to see, offered him to be killed, gave him to be imitated, set him forth to be believed, so that by this faith the eye of the mind might be healed to see God. Why then do we disdain to hear the voice of the body from the mouth of the head? The church suffered in him when he suffered for the church, just as he too suffered in the church when the church suffered for him. For just as we have heard the voice of the church suffering in Christ, "God, my God, look upon me; why have you forsaken me?", so we have heard also the voice of Christ suffering in the church: "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?"

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 61:10: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:31: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:32: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:24: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:6: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 9:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:3; Isa 61:10 (Old Latin); Eph 5:31–32 (Gen 2:24); Matt 19:6; John 1:3, 14; Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX); Acts 9:4. "Sacramentum" (Eph 5:32) is rendered "sacrament", as the Latin has it (Greek "mystery").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.18 (CSEL 44:168–169; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/139-1/#p-140-18).

## Letter 140.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-19
- Source: CSEL 44:169–170
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God 'forsakes' us by not granting temporal goods, but not for the better things he wants us to desire; he seeks a holy dwelling in the love poured out by the Spirit.

### Latin text

Cum itaque non exaudimur ad temporalia bona retinenda uel adipiscenda, quando pro his deprecamur deum, in eo, quod nos non exaudit, derelinquit nos; sed ad potiora, quae uult, ut intellegamus et praeferamus et concupiscamus, non nos derelinquit. unde sequitur psalmus et dicit: Clamaui ad te per diem nec exaudies et nocte — etiam hic subauditur nec exaudies —: sed uide quid adiungit: et non ad insipientiam mihi. hoc ergo dicit: Non me quidem exaudies clamantem per diem, id est in rebus prosperis, ut eas non amittam, et nocte, id est in rebus aduersis, ut prospera, quae amissa sunt, redeant, uerum hoc non mihi ad insipientiam facies, sed potius ut sapiam, quid iam per noui testamenti gratiam a te expectare, quid desiderare, quid poscere debeam. clamo quippe ego, ut mihi bona temporalia non auferantur, tu autem in sancto habitas, laus Israhel. nolo, ut derelinquas concupiscentiam meam, qua carnalem felicitatem requiro; uerum haec est in sordibus uetustatis, tu autem quaeris munditiam nouitatis; non exaudiendo istam cupiditatem relinquis, quia caritatem, in qua habites, quaeris; caritas autem dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. ideo in sancto habitas, laus Israhel, laus uidentium te, quia non in se laudantur sed in te; quid enim habent, quod non acceperunt, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur?

### English translation (Claude)

When, therefore, we are not heard for keeping or obtaining temporal goods, when we pray to God for these, he forsakes us in that he does not hear us; but he does not forsake us for the better things which he wants us to understand, prefer, and desire. Hence the psalm continues and says: "I have cried to you by day, and you will not hear, and by night" (here too "and you will not hear" is understood); but see what he adds: "and not for folly to me." He says this, then: You will not hear me crying by day, that is, in prosperity, so that I may not lose it, nor by night, that is, in adversity, so that the prosperity I have lost may return; but you will do this not for folly to me, but rather so that I may become wise as to what I ought now, through the grace of the New Testament, to expect from you, what to desire, what to ask. For I cry out that temporal goods may not be taken from me; "but you dwell in the holy place, the praise of Israel." I do not want you to forsake my desire by which I seek bodily happiness; but this is in the filth of oldness, while you seek the cleanness of newness. By not hearing this desire you forsake it, because you seek love, in which to dwell; and "the love of God is poured out in our hearts," but "through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us." Therefore "you dwell in the holy place, the praise of Israel," the praise of those who see you, because they are praised not in themselves but in you; "for what do they have that they did not receive," so that "he who glories, let him glory in the Lord"?

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:2 (21:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:3 (21:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:2–3 (21:3–4 LXX, Old Latin); Rom 5:5; 1 Cor 4:7; 1 Cor 1:31. "Israel" is glossed as "those who see" (God), a traditional etymology.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.19 (CSEL 44:169–170; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-19).

## Letter 140.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-20
- Source: CSEL 44:170–171
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Under the Old Testament God delivered the fathers from earthly dangers, as with Isaac, Job, Daniel, and the three youths; the Jews expected the same for Christ and did not see that eternal goods were now revealed.

### Latin text

Haec est gratia testamenti noui. nam in uetere testamento quando commendabas nonnisi a te peti sperarique debere etiam ipsam terrenam temporalemque felicitatem, in te sperauerunt patres nostri, sperauerunt et eruisti eos; ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi. illos quippe patres inter inimicos suos uiuentes et diuitiis implesti et ab hostibus eruisti gloriosasque uictorias reportare fecisti et de diuersis eos mortibus liberasti. pro alio subiecisti, ne feriretur, arietem; alium de putredine sanum et ei dupla, quae amiserat, reddidisti; alium inter leones esurientes inlaesum integrumque seruasti; aliorum inter flammas deambulantium grata uoce laudatus es. tale aliquid in Christo expectabant fieri Iudaei, unde probarent, si uere filius dei esset. ex eorum persona et in libro sapientiae dicitur: Morte turpissima condemnemus eum; erit enim respectus in sermonibus ipsius. si enim uerus filius dei est, suscipiet eum et liberabit eum de manibus contrariorum. haec, inquit, cogitauerunt et errauerunt; excaecauit enim eos malitia eorum. adtendentes quippe tempus ueteris testamenti et illam patrum etiam temporalem felicitatem, in qua illis exhibenda demonstrauit deus etiam talia dona sua esse, non uiderunt iam esse tempus, quo reuelaretur in Christo bona aeterna proprie deum praestare iustis, qui bona temporalia praestat et impiis.

### English translation (Claude)

This is the grace of the New Testament. For in the Old Testament, when you were making known that even earthly and temporal happiness should be asked and hoped for from none but you, "our fathers hoped in you; they hoped and you delivered them; they cried to you and were saved; they hoped in you and were not put to shame." For those fathers, living among their enemies, you both filled with riches and delivered from their foes, and made to win glorious victories, and freed from various deaths. For one you put a ram in his place so that he should not be struck; another you made whole from his rotting sores and restored to him double what he had lost; another you kept unharmed and whole among hungry lions; by others, walking about amid the flames, you were praised with a grateful voice. Something of this kind the Jews expected to happen in Christ, by which they might prove whether he was truly the Son of God. In their person it is said in the book of Wisdom too: "Let us condemn him to a most shameful death; for there will be regard paid to his words. For if he is truly the Son of God, he will take him up and deliver him from the hands of his adversaries." "These things," it says, "they thought, and they erred; for their malice blinded them." For attending to the time of the Old Testament and to that temporal happiness of the fathers, in which God showed that even such gifts were his own to be given to them, they did not see that the time had now come when it was to be revealed in Christ that God properly gives eternal goods to the just, he who gives temporal goods to the ungodly too.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:4 (21:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:5 (21:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:13: allusion, high confidence
- Job 42:10: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:22: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:25: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:43: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 2:20 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 2:18 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 2:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:4–5 (21:5–6 LXX); Gen 22:13; Job 42:10; Dan 6:22; Dan 3:24 (and the Song of the Three Youths); Wisdom 2:20, 18, 21. The reference to "the Jews" concerns those who demanded a sign at the crucifixion (Matt 27:40–43); translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.20 (CSEL 44:170–171; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-20).

## Letter 140.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-21
- Source: CSEL 44:171–172
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'I am a worm and not a man' may mean, besides the virgin birth, 'I am the son of man and not man', that is, Christ in whom all are made alive, not Adam in whom all die.

### Latin text

Denique cum dixisset: In te sperauerunt patres nostri, sperauerunt et eruisti eos; ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi, uide, quid adiunxerit: Ego autem sum uermis et non homo. quod uidetur quidem ad commendandam humilitatem simpliciter dictum, ut se in oculis persequentium abiectissimum quiddam et contemptissimum demonstraret; sed non est contemnenda altitudo secreti profunditasque mysterii praesertim in eis uerbis, quae tanto saluatori in prophetiae praedicatione coaptantur. dictus est hinc sensus elegantissimus a prioribus, ideo se hoc nomine Christum praenuntiari uoluisse, quia uermis de carne sine concubitu nascitur, sicut natus est ille de uirgine. sed in libro suo Iob cum de creaturis caelestibus loqueretur, quod in dei conspectu etiam ipsa uix munda sint: Quanto magis, inquit, homo putredo et filius hominis uermis. putredinem pro mortalitate posuit, quae iam uelut conceptam gerit moriendi necessitatem, in quam peccando contrusus est homo, et filium hominis uermem natum de putredine quasi putrem, hoc est de mortalitate mortalem. ac per hoc in his uerbis psalmi alium sensum nos quaerere admonuit illo quidem saluo neque reprobato, ut non solum scrutemur, quod ait: Ego autem sum uermis, sed etiam illud, quod addidit: et non homo, secundum illud, quod de libro Iob commemoraui, tamquam diceret: Ego autem sum filius hominis et non homo, non quod homo non sit Christus, de quo apostolus dicit: Unus et mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus — omnis enim filius hominis homo est —, sed ad quendam respicit sensus iste, qui homo sic fuerit, ut non esset filius hominis, id est Adam. forte ergo sic dictum est: Ego autem sum uermis et non homo, id est ego autem sum filius hominis et non homo, tamquam diceretur: Ego autem sum Christus, in quo omnes uiuificantur, non Adam, in quo omnes moriuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, when he had said, "Our fathers hoped in you; they hoped and you delivered them; they cried to you and were saved; they hoped in you and were not put to shame," see what he added: "But I am a worm and not a man." This seems indeed to have been said simply to commend humility, to show himself in the eyes of his persecutors as something most abject and despised; but the height of the secret and the depth of the mystery are not to be despised, especially in words which are fitted to so great a Savior in the proclamation of prophecy. A most elegant sense has been given of this by earlier writers: that Christ wished to be foretold by this name because a worm is born from flesh without intercourse, as he was born of a virgin. But Job in his book, when speaking of the heavenly creatures, that even they are scarcely clean in God's sight, says: "How much more man, who is rottenness, and the son of man, a worm." He put "rottenness" for mortality, which carries the necessity of dying as if already conceived, into which man was thrust by sinning; and "the son of man, a worm," born of rottenness, as it were rotten, that is, mortal from mortality. And so he has prompted us to seek another sense in these words of the psalm, without setting aside or rejecting that one: that we should examine not only what he says, "But I am a worm," but also what he added, "and not a man," according to what I have quoted from the book of Job, as if he said: But I am the son of man and not man; not that Christ is not a man, of whom the apostle says, "One also is the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus" (for every son of man is a man), but this sense looks to a certain one who was a man in such a way that he was not a son of man, that is, Adam. Perhaps, then, "But I am a worm and not a man" was said thus: But I am the son of man and not man; as if it were said: But I am Christ, in whom all are made alive, not Adam, in whom all die.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:4 (21:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:5 (21:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Job 25:5: allusion, high confidence
- Job 25:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:4–6 (21:5–7 LXX); Job 25:5–6; 1 Tim 2:5; 1 Cor 15:22. The interpretation of the worm as a figure of the virgin birth is attributed to "earlier writers" (e.g. Ambrose).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.21 (CSEL 44:171–172; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-21).

## Letter 140.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-22
- Source: CSEL 44:172–174
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Earthly deliverance belongs to the old man descended from Adam; the new 'sons of men' in Christ hope for the eternal salvation that Psalm 36 distinguishes from the safety shared with beasts.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc discite, homines, per gratiam testamenti noui iam uitam concupiscere sempiternam. quid pro magno ita uos uultis a domino de morte liberari, sicut liberati sunt patres nostri, quando commendabat deus etiam terrenae felicitatis praeter se non esse alium largitorem? illa felicitas ad ueterem hominem pertinet, quae uetustas ab Adam coepit. ego autem sum uermis et non homo; Christus, non Adam. a ueteri ueteres fuistis, a nouo noui estote; ab Adam homines, a Christo filii hominum. non enim sine causa familiarissime dominus in euangelio se filium hominis dicit magis quam hominem nec sine causa in alio psalmo: Homines, inquit, et iumenta saluos facies, domine, sicut multiplicata est misericordia tua, deus. abs te quippe etiam ista salus hominibus iumentisque communis. sed habent aliam homines noui propriam quandam et a iumentorum consortio separatam, quae ad nouum pertinet testamentum, habent omnino; nam de illa ibidem sequitur et dicit: Filii autem hominum sub tegmine alarum tuarum sperabunt; inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae et torrente uoluptatis tuae potabis eos, quoniam apud te fons uitae, in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen. certe et hic, cum superius dixisset homines, posterius dixit filii autem hominum tamquam distinguens ab hominibus filios hominum. in illa quippe felicitate eius salutis, quae communis est hominibus et iumentis, eo nomine illos appellare uoluit, quo demonstrarentur ad illum primum hominem pertinere, quo uetustas coepit et mors, qui sic fuit homo, ut non esset filius hominis; istis autem posterioribus, qui sperant aliam felicitatem et fontis uitae ineffabilem uoluptatem et sempiterni luminis lumen, hoc nomen inposuit, quo se familiarius appellari uoluit dominus eorum, in quo talis gratia reuelata est, eosque filios hominum potius quam homines appellauit.

### English translation (Claude)

And therefore learn, O men, through the grace of the New Testament, now to desire everlasting life. Why do you want so much, as something great, to be delivered from death by the Lord as our fathers were delivered, when God was making known that there is no other giver even of earthly happiness besides himself? That happiness belongs to the old man, and that oldness began from Adam. "But I am a worm and not a man": Christ, not Adam. From the old one you were old; from the new one be new: men from Adam, sons of men from Christ. For not without reason does the Lord in the Gospel most familiarly call himself the Son of Man rather than man; nor without reason does he say in another psalm, "Men and beasts you will save, O Lord, as your mercy has been multiplied, O God." For from you comes even this salvation common to men and beasts. But the new men have another, a salvation of their own, separate from the fellowship of beasts, which belongs to the New Testament; they certainly have it, for of it he goes on in the same place to say: "But the sons of men will hope under the shelter of your wings; they will be inebriated with the abundance of your house, and you will give them to drink of the torrent of your pleasure; for with you is the fountain of life; in your light we shall see light." Certainly here too, when he had said "men" above, he said afterward "but the sons of men," as if distinguishing the sons of men from men. For in that happiness of the salvation which is common to men and beasts he wished to call them by the name which would show that they belong to that first man, with whom oldness and death began, who was a man in such a way that he was not a son of man; but on these latter, who hope for another happiness, the ineffable pleasure of the fountain of life and the light of everlasting light, he imposed the name by which their Lord, in whom such grace was revealed, wished more familiarly to be called; and he called them sons of men rather than men.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:6 (35:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:7 (35:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:8 (35:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX); Ps 36:6–9 (35:7–10 LXX), in the Old Latin. The contrast "men" (from Adam) and "sons of men" (from Christ) is Augustine's interpretation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.22 (CSEL 44:172–174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-22).

## Letter 140.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-23
- Source: CSEL 44:174
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The distinction between 'men' and 'sons of men' is not a fixed rule but follows the context; here 'But I' marks Christ off from the fathers delivered under the Old Testament.

### Latin text

Non autem existimes quasi locutionis regulam figi perpetua lege seruandam, ut, ubicumque legeris (homines) aut filios hominum, secundum hanc distinctionem semper intellegas, sed ut se habuerit circumstantia lectionis, unde sensus, si patet, hauritur, si latet, eruitur; sicut in hoc loco psalmi huius quem non moueat distinctionis intentio, cum ille, qui dixerat: In te sperauerunt patres nostri et eruisti eos; ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi, subiungit: Ego autem? non enim ait sic: Et ego, sed: Ego autem. quid ergo iste, qui se ita distinguit? ego autem, inquit, sum uermis et non homo, tamquam illis, quos exaudisti et eruisti, eam commendares felicitatem, quae ad uetus pertinens testamentum homini ueteri tribuenda esset, qui coepit ab Adam, ego autem sum uermis, hoc est filius hominis, non homo sicut ille homo, qui non fuit filius hominis.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not think, however, that a rule of speech is being fixed to be kept by a perpetual law, so that wherever you read "men" or "sons of men" you always understand them according to this distinction; but according to the circumstances of the passage, from which the sense is drawn if it is plain, and dug out if it is hidden. So in this place of this psalm, whom would not the intent of the distinction strike, when he who had said, "Our fathers hoped in you and you delivered them; they cried to you and were saved; they hoped in you and were not put to shame," adds, "But I"? For he does not say "And I," but "But I." What then is this one who distinguishes himself so? "But I," he says, "am a worm and not a man"; as if he said: to those whom you heard and delivered you were commending that happiness which, belonging to the Old Testament, was to be granted to the old man, who began from Adam; but I am a worm, that is, a son of man, not a man like that man who was not a son of man.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:4 (21:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:5 (21:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:4–6 (21:5–7 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.23 (CSEL 44:174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-23).

## Letter 140.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-24
- Source: CSEL 44:174–175
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's mockers, belonging to the Old Testament, taunted him because he was not delivered; he willed to appear forsaken so that we might seek a happiness now held by faith and later by sight.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc ego et quod sequitur: Opprobrium hominum et abiectio plebis; omnes, qui conspiciebant me, subsannabant me et locuti sunt labiis, mouerunt caput: Sperauit in deum, eruat eum, saluum faciat eum, quoniam uult eum. hoc in labiis, non in corde dixerunt insultando, quod non fieret, non credendo, quod futurum esset. factum est autem et hoc, sed sicut fieri oportebat in filio hominis, in quo spes aeternae uitae fuerat reuelanda ad nouum pertinens testamentum, non sicut illi expectabant. et quia fieri non uidebant, tamquam superato insultabant pertinentes ad testamentum uetus et hominem, in quo omnes moriuntur, non ad filium hominis, in quo omnes uiuificabuntur. mortem quippe intulit homo sibi filioque hominis; uitam uero adtulit homini moriens et resurgens filius hominis, opprobrium hominum et abiectio plebis usque ad mortem. hoc enim uoluit in conspectu inimicorum pati, quo eum tamquam derelictum putarent, ut gratia commendaretur testamenti noui, qua disceremus aliam quaerere felicitatem, quae nunc est in fide, postea uero erit in specie. quam diu enim sumus in corpore, ait apostolus, peregrinamur a domino; per fidem enim ambulamus, non per speciem et ideo nunc in spe, tunc in re.

### English translation (Claude)

And therefore I am also what follows: "the reproach of men and the outcast of the people; all who saw me mocked me, and spoke with their lips and shook their heads: He hoped in God, let him deliver him, let him save him, since he wants him." This they said with their lips, not in their heart, taunting him because it was not happening, not believing that it would happen. Yet this too happened, but as it had to happen in the Son of Man, in whom the hope of eternal life belonging to the New Testament was to be revealed, not as they expected. And because they did not see it happen, they taunted him as one overcome, belonging as they did to the Old Testament and to the man in whom all die, not to the Son of Man in whom all will be made alive. For man brought death on himself and on the son of man; but the Son of Man, dying and rising, brought life to man, "the reproach of men and the outcast of the people" even to death. For he willed to suffer this in the sight of his enemies, so that they would think him forsaken, so that the grace of the New Testament might be commended, by which we might learn to seek another happiness, which is now in faith, but later will be in sight. "For as long as we are in the body," says the apostle, "we are away from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight"; and so now in hope, then in reality.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:7 (21:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:8 (21:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 27:39: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:6–8 (21:7–9 LXX); Matt 27:39–43; 1 Cor 15:22; 2 Cor 5:6–7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.24 (CSEL 44:174–175; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-24).

## Letter 140.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-25
- Source: CSEL 44:175–176
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ showed his risen body not to his persecutors but to his disciples, so that others would believe their testimony, sealed with signs and their own sufferings.

### Latin text

Denique resurrectionem suam, quam non sicut nostram in longum differri oportebat, ut in exemplo carnis eius disceremus, quid in nostra sperare deberemus, noluit alienis demonstrare sed suis; alienis dico non natura sed uitio, quod semper contra naturam est. mortuus est ergo in conspectu hominum, resurrexit autem in conspectu filiorum hominum, quia mors ad hominem pertinebat, resurrectio ad filium hominis; sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. ut igitur exemplo suae carnis exhortaretur fideles suos temporalem pro aeterna felicitate contemnere, usque ad mortem pertulit persequentes atque saeuientes et quasi uicto et oppresso superbe inludentes. quod autem carnem suam resuscitauit et discipulorum aspectibus atque contactibus reddidit eisque uidentibus ascendit in caelum, ipsos aedificauit et, quid expectare, quid praedicare deberent, euidentissima ueritate monstrauit. illos autem, a quibus tanta mala usque ad mortem pertulerat, quasi de illo superato et extincto gloriantes in ea opinione dereliquit, ut, quisquis eorum salute aeterna saluus fieri uellet, hoc de illius mortui resurrectione crederet, quod hi, qui uiderunt, signis contestantibus praedicauerunt et pro ea praedicatione similia perpeti non dubitauerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, his resurrection, which, unlike ours, was not to be put off for long, so that from the example of his flesh we might learn what we ought to hope for in ours, he chose to show not to strangers but to his own: strangers, I mean, not by nature but by vice, which is always against nature. He died, therefore, in the sight of men, but rose in the sight of the sons of men; because death belonged to man, resurrection to the Son of Man; "for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive." So, in order to exhort his faithful by the example of his flesh to despise temporal happiness for eternal, he endured even to death his persecutors, raging and proudly mocking him as one conquered and crushed. But by raising his flesh and restoring it to the sight and touch of his disciples, and ascending into heaven while they watched, he built them up and showed them with most evident truth what they ought to expect and what to preach. But those from whom he had endured such evils even to death, boasting over him as overcome and extinguished, he left in that opinion, so that whoever of them wished to be saved with eternal salvation should believe about the resurrection of the dead one what those who saw it preached, with signs bearing witness, and for which preaching they did not hesitate to suffer similar things.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:39: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:9: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 10:41: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:22; Luke 24:39; Acts 1:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.25 (CSEL 44:175–176; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-25).

## Letter 140.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-26
- Source: CSEL 44:176–177
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: James contrasts Job's endurance, rewarded with temporal goods, with 'the end of the Lord', teaching Christians to hope for eternal goods; the veil of the Old Testament is removed in Christ.

### Latin text

Quapropter etiam Iacobus, unus ex apostolis eius, in epistula sua, cum exhortaretur fideles, qui post passionem et resurrectionem Christi adhuc in ista uita tenebantur, dispensationem testamenti ueteris nouique distinguens: Sustinentiam, inquit, Iob audistis et finem domini uidistis, ne ideo patienter sustinerent temporalia mala, ut sibi hoc restitueretur, quod recepisse Iob legimus. nam et ab illo uulnere atque putredine saluus est factus et ei cuncta, quae amiserat, duplicata sunt restituta. ubi etiam commendata est resurrectionis fides. nam filii non in duplum sed totidem redditi etiam illos, quos amiserat, resurrecturos significarunt; sic ipsi quoque illis prioribus iuncti a restitutione dupli non inuenirentur alieni. ut ergo non talem remunerationem speraremus, quando mala temporalia pateremur, non ait: Sustinentiam et finem Iob audistis, sed ait: Sustinentiam Iob audistis et finem domini uidistis, tamquam diceret: Mala temporalia sicut Iob sustinete, sed pro hac sustinentia non temporalia bona sperate, quae illi aucta redierunt, sed aeterna potius, quae in domino praecesserunt. Iob ergo de illis patribus erat, qui exclamauerunt et salui facti sunt. cum enim dicit: Ego autem, satis insinuat, qua salute illos saluos esse factos uelit intellegi, in qua ipse utique derelictus est, non quo illi a salute aeterna fuerint alieni, sed in occulto tunc erat, quod in Christo fuerat reuelandum. in uetere quippe testamento uelamen est, quod tunc auferetur, cum ad Christum quisque inde transierit. quo crucifixo uelamen etiam templi scissum est, ut significaretur, quod apostolus de uelamine ueteris testamenti dixit: Quoniam in Christo euacuatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason James too, one of his apostles, in his letter, when exhorting the faithful who after Christ's passion and resurrection were still held in this life, and distinguishing the dispensation of the Old and the New Testament, says: "You have heard of the endurance of Job, and you have seen the end of the Lord"; lest they should endure temporal evils patiently in order that what we read Job received back should be restored to them. For he was made whole from that wound and rottenness, and everything he had lost was restored to him doubled. In this the faith of the resurrection is also commended. For his sons, restored not double but in the same number, signified that those also whom he had lost would rise again; so that they too, joined to those former ones, might not be found strangers to the restoration of the double. So, that we might not hope for such a reward when we suffer temporal evils, he does not say, "You have heard of the endurance and the end of Job," but, "You have heard of the endurance of Job, and you have seen the end of the Lord"; as if he said: Endure temporal evils as Job did, but for this endurance do not hope for temporal goods, which came back to him increased, but rather for eternal goods, which went before you in the Lord. Job, then, was one of those fathers who cried out and were saved. For when he says, "But I," he indicates clearly enough with what salvation he wishes them to be understood to have been saved: the one in which he himself was certainly forsaken; not that they were strangers to eternal salvation, but that what was to be revealed in Christ was then hidden. For in the Old Testament there is a veil, which will be taken away when anyone passes over from there to Christ. When he was crucified the veil of the temple also was torn, to signify what the apostle said of the veil of the Old Testament: "since in Christ it is done away."

### Scripture references

- Jas 5:11: quotation, high confidence
- Job 42:10: allusion, high confidence
- Job 42:13: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:14: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:51: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jas 5:11; Job 42:10, 13; Ps 22:6 (21:7 LXX); 2 Cor 3:14–16; Matt 27:51. The doubled flocks but equal number of sons as a sign of resurrection is Augustine's interpretation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.26 (CSEL 44:176–177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-19/#p-140-26).

## Letter 140.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-27
- Source: CSEL 44:177–178
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There were martyrs before Christ, and in the New Testament there are faithful rich people who use wealth well; Christ's cry expresses the martyrs' voice, who seem forsaken but submit to the Father's will.

### Latin text

Nam et in illis patribus quamuis rarissima tamen fuerunt et usque ad mortem exempla patientiae a sanguine Abel usque ad sanguinem Zachariae, quorum sanguinem dicit dominus Iesus et ab eis exigendum, qui in patrum suorum, a quibus illi occisi sunt, iniquitate persisterent, et in nouo testamento nec defuit nec deest bonorum fidelium multitudo, qui etiam ista temporali felicitate praepolleant et in ea largitoris dei bonitatem misericordiamque experiantur tenentes tamen, quod dispensator noui testamenti diuitibus huius saeculi apostolus praecipit, non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum; ut bene faciant, diuites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam, qualis in Christi non tantum spiritu uerum etiam carne manifestata est. cum resurrexit a mortuis, non qualem Iudaei in illo peremerunt, quando eum de manibus eorum deus non eruit eumque dereliquisse uisus est exclamantem: Deus, deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? ut eo modo in se transfiguraret martyres suos, qui, etsi mori nollent, quod etiam Petro dixit: Alter te cinget et feret, quo tu non uis significans, qua morte glorificaturus erat deum, et ob hoc a deo suo derelicti uiderentur ad tempus, cum eis nollet praestare, quod uellent, illam uocem cordis emitterent illumque adhiberent pietatis affectum, quem passione inpendente ore proprio dominus expressit eos in se identidem transfigurans: Verum non quod ego uolo, sed quod tu uis, pater.

### English translation (Claude)

For among those fathers too there were, though very rare, examples of patience even to death, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, whose blood the Lord Jesus says will be required of those who persist in the wickedness of their fathers by whom these were killed; and in the New Testament there has not been lacking, nor is there lacking, a multitude of good believers who are strong even in this temporal happiness and experience in it the goodness and mercy of God the giver, yet holding to what the apostle, the steward of the New Testament, commands the rich of this world: "not to be proud, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches, but in the living God, who gives us all things richly to enjoy; that they do good, be rich in good works, give readily, share, lay up for themselves a good foundation for the future, so that they may lay hold of the true life": such life as was manifested not only in Christ's spirit but also in his flesh when he rose from the dead; not the life which the Jews destroyed in him, when God did not deliver him from their hands and seemed to have forsaken him as he cried out, "God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" He did this in order to transfer his martyrs to himself in this way: those who, even though they did not wish to die (as he said also to Peter, "Another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish," signifying by what death he would glorify God), and for this reason seemed for a time to be forsaken by their God, since he would not grant them what they wished, should utter that voice of the heart and show that affection of piety which the Lord, as his passion approached, expressed with his own mouth, again and again transferring them to himself: "Yet not what I will, but what you will, Father."

### Scripture references

- Matt 23:35: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 27:46: quotation, high confidence
- John 21:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 21:19: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 14:36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 23:35; 1 Tim 6:17–19; Matt 27:46; John 21:18–19; Mark 14:36 (Matt 26:39).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.27 (CSEL 44:177–178; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-27).

## Letter 140.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-28
- Source: CSEL 44:178–179
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God delivered many fathers from earthly dangers but not Christ, so that his body, the church, might learn to be Christian not for this life but for eternal life.

### Latin text

In quo enim primitus nisi in ipso capite nostro debuit apparere, propter quam uitam Christiani sumus? propterea non ait: Deus meus, dereliquisti me, sed causam commonuit requirendam, cum addidit: ut quid dereliquisti me? id est quare, propter quid, quam ob causam? profecto enim erat aliqua causa eaque non parua, ut Noe liberaret de diluuio, Loth de caelesti incendio, Isaac de imminenti gladio, Ioseph de calumnia mulieris et custodia carceris, Moysen ab Aegyptiis, Raab de excidio ciuitatis, Susannam a testibus falsis, Danihelem a leonibus, tres uiros ab ignibus aliosque patres, qui exclamauerunt et salui facti sunt, et Christum non liberaret de manibus Iudaeorum eumque in potestate saeuientium usque ad mortis exitum derelinqueret. ut quid hoc? propter quid hoc nisi propter illud, quod paulo post in eodem psalmo dicit: Non ad insipientiam mihi, hoc est corpori meo, ecclesiae meae, minimis meis? nam et in euangelio: Quando uni ex minimis meis fecistis, inquit, mihi fecistis. sic itaque dictum est et non ad insipientiam mihi, quo modo dictum est mihi fecistis, et sic dictum est quare dereliquisti me quo modo dictum est: Qui uos recipit, me recipit, et, qui nos spernit, me spernit. non ergo ad insipientiam nobis, sed ut sapiamus non propter istam uitam, in qua nos deus aliquando usque ad mortem persequentium manibus derelinquit, sed propter illam sempiternam nos debere esse Christianos, quia hoc in illo praecessisse intuemur, ex cuius nomine sic uocamur.

### English translation (Claude)

For in whom first should the life for whose sake we are Christians have appeared, if not in our head himself? That is why he does not say, "My God, you have forsaken me," but reminds us that the cause must be sought, when he adds, "why have you forsaken me?", that is, for what reason, on what account, for what cause? For surely there was some cause, and no small one, why he should deliver Noah from the flood, Lot from the fire from heaven, Isaac from the threatening sword, Joseph from the woman's slander and from the prison, Moses from the Egyptians, Rahab from the destruction of the city, Susanna from the false witnesses, Daniel from the lions, the three men from the fire, and other fathers who cried out and were saved, and yet not deliver Christ from the hands of the Jews, but leave him in the power of those who raged against him even to the end of death. Why this? For what reason, if not for what he says a little later in the same psalm: "and not for folly to me," that is, to my body, to my church, to my least ones? For in the Gospel too he says: "When you did it to one of the least of mine, you did it to me." So "and not for folly to me" was said in the way "you did it to me" was said; and "why have you forsaken me" was said in the way it was said, "He who receives you receives me," and "He who rejects you rejects me." Not, then, for folly to us, but that we may be wise and understand that we ought to be Christians not for the sake of this life, in which God sometimes leaves us in the hands of persecutors even to death, but for the sake of that everlasting life; because we see that this went before in him from whose name we are so called.

### Scripture references

- Gen 7:23: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 19:29: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:12: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 41:14: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 14:30: allusion, high confidence
- Josh 6:25: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:22: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:26: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:2 (21:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:40: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:40: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 10:16: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sus (Susanna): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 7–8; Gen 19; Gen 22; Gen 39–41; Exod 14; Josh 6:25; Susanna (Greek Daniel); Dan 6; Dan 3; Ps 22:2 (21:3 LXX); Matt 25:40; Matt 10:40; Luke 10:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.28 (CSEL 44:178–179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-28).

## Letter 140.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-29
- Source: CSEL 44:179–180
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many want to be Christians only for earthly happiness; Christ, who laid down his life freely, spoke those words for us, his body.

### Latin text

Ecce ita factum est. tamen tam multi non ob aliud uolunt esse Christiani, nisi ut huius uitae felicitate perfruantur, ideoque illa deficiente deficiunt. quid, si non in ipso nostro capite tam insigne constitueretur exemplum, quo disceremus pro caelestibus terrena contemnere non respicientes, quae uidentur, sed quae non uidentur? quae enim uidentur, temporalia sunt, quae autem non uidentur, aeterna. quos in se illis uocibus transfigurare dignatus est? nam quantum ad ipsum adtinet, quo modo uellet liberari ab illa hora, qui propterea uenerat in illam horam? aut quo modo sic loquebatur, quasi ei, quod nollet, accideret, cum potestatem habuerit ponendi animam suam et iterum sumendi eam nec eam quisquam tolleret ab illo, sed eam ipse poneret et resumeret, sicut in euangelio dicit? sed procul dubio nos in illis uocibus nostris eramus et caput pro suo corpore loquebatur non disiuncta significatione uocis, ubi conexio non disiungitur unitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

See, so it was done; yet so many want to be Christians for no other reason than to enjoy the happiness of this life, and so when it fails they fall away. What if so striking an example had not been set in our head himself, by which we might learn to despise earthly things for heavenly, looking not at the things that are seen but at those that are not seen? For the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal. Whom did he deign to transfer to himself by those words? For as far as he himself is concerned, how could he wish to be delivered from that hour, when he had come for that very hour? Or how could he speak as if what he did not wish were happening to him, when he had power to lay down his life and to take it up again, and no one took it from him, but he laid it down himself and took it up again, as he says in the Gospel? But without doubt we were in those words of ours, and the head was speaking for his body, without separating the meaning of the words, where the connection of unity is not separated.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 12:27: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:17: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 4:18; John 12:27; John 10:17–18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.29 (CSEL 44:179–180; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-29).

## Letter 140.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-30
- Source: CSEL 44:180–181
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Psalm 22's words about the womb and breasts express our passing from the goods of the flesh to God as our good; Christ signified this change in his flesh, though he never needed to leave ungodliness.

### Latin text

Denique in psalmo sequitur et orans aduerte quid dicat: Quoniam tu, inquit, extraxisti me de uentre, spes mea ab uberibus matris meae. in te iactatus sum ex utero; de uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, tamquam diceret: De alia re et ab alia re in aliam rem me traiecisti, ut tu sis mihi bonum pro terrenis bonis mortalitatis huius, quam in matris uentre sortitus sum, quia ubera suxi. haec enim uetustas est, de qua tu me extraxisti, et illa carnalis natiuitatis bona sunt, a quibus tu spes mea es; inde enim ad te conuersus sum. et ex utero, id est ex his, quae in utero inchoaui, in te iactatus sum ad te scilicet transiens, totum me tibi committens. ideoque de uentre matris meae, id est de bonis carnis, quam sumpsi in uentre matris meae, deus meus es tu, ut de his tu sis bonum meum, ea locutione dictum est, ac si diceretur uerbi gratia: De terra caelum habito, hoc est hinc illo emigraui; et ista nostra in illum transfiguratio est, qui per gratiam testamenti noui mutamus uitam transeuntes de uetere ad nouam. nam ille hanc rem sacramento suae passionis resurrectionisque significans carnem mutauit de mortalitate ad inmortalitatem, uitam uero non mutauit de uetustate in nouitatem, qui numquam fuit in impietate, unde transiret ad pietatem.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, the psalm goes on; pay attention, as you pray, to what it says: "For you," it says, "drew me out of the belly; my hope from my mother's breasts. Upon you I was cast from the womb; from my mother's belly you are my God." It is as if he said: From one thing and away from one thing you have carried me over into another, so that you may be my good in place of the earthly goods of this mortality, which I received in my mother's belly, because I sucked the breasts. For this is the oldness from which you drew me out, and those are the goods of carnal birth, away from which you are my hope; for from there I turned to you. And "from the womb", that is, from the things I began in the womb, "upon you I was cast," passing, that is, to you, committing my whole self to you. And therefore "from my mother's belly you are my God," that is, from the goods of the flesh which I took in my mother's belly, so that instead of these you may be my good: it is said in the manner of speech as if one were to say, for example, "From the earth I dwell in heaven," that is, I have moved from here to there. And this is our transfer into him, we who through the grace of the New Testament change our life, passing from the old to the new. For he, signifying this by the sacrament of his passion and resurrection, changed his flesh from mortality to immortality, but did not change his life from oldness to newness, he who was never in ungodliness, from which to pass over to godliness.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:9 (21:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:10 (21:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:9–10 (21:10–11 LXX), in the Old Latin. "Iactatus sum" is rendered "I was cast".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.30 (CSEL 44:180–181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-30).

## Letter 140.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-31
- Source: CSEL 44:181–182
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine weighs how the psalm's words about the womb and the breasts could refer to Christ himself, as man, and to the virgin birth.

### Latin text

Quamquam non defuerunt, qui hoc, quod dictum est: De uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, ideo ad ipsum caput nostrum pertinere sentirent, quoniam pater in tantum est deus eius, in quantum homo est in forma serui, non in quantum illi aequalis est in forma dei, ideo: De uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, ac si diceret: Ex eo, quod homo factus sum, deus meus es tu. sed quid est: Tu extraxisti me de uentre, si ad ipsum legum de uirgine procreatum refertur? quasi alios non deus extrahat, in cuius prouidentia est omnis ordo nascendi; an inde significare uoluit uirginis partum seruata uirginitatis integritate mirabili, cum ait: Tu extraxisti me de uentre, ut quod illic mirabiliter factum est, cum deus fecisse dicitur, nemini incredibile uideatur? quid ergo est et illud: Spes mea ab uberibus matris meae? quo modo et hoc ad ipsum caput ecclesiae referri potest, quasi spes eius, quae in deo est, a matris uberibus ei coeperit, non et ante in ipso utero? neque enim spes alia intellegenda est, nisi qua futurum erat, ut deus eum exaltaret a mortuis; totum quippe hoc secundum id, quod homo factus est, dicitur. an forte, quia ubera feminarum ab ipso conceptu in ubertatem promoueri perhibentur, sic intellegi uoluit ab uberibus, tamquam diceret: Ex quo carnem sumpsi, cui carni fuerat speranda inmortalitas, ut non ante spes ei esset, cum in forma dei esset, in qua nihil in melius mutandum esset, sed ab uberibus matris, id est ab ipsa susceptione carnis, quae concipiebatur in spe, cuius spei res futura erat, cum ad inmortalitatem de morte transiret?

### English translation (Claude)

There have, however, been some who thought that the words "from my mother's belly you are my God" refer to our head himself, because the Father is his God in so far as he is man in the form of a servant, not in so far as he is equal to him in the form of God; so that "from my mother's belly you are my God" would be as if he said: From the time I was made man, you are my God. But what does "You drew me out of the belly" mean, if it refers to him born of the virgin? As if God did not draw out others, in whose providence is the whole order of birth. Or did he wish to signify by this the virgin's childbearing, with the integrity of virginity wonderfully preserved, when he says "You drew me out of the belly," so that what was wonderfully done there may seem incredible to no one, since God is said to have done it? What then does "my hope from my mother's breasts" mean? How can this too be referred to the head of the church himself, as though his hope, which is in God, began for him from his mother's breasts, and not before, in the womb itself? For no other hope is to be understood than that by which it was to come about that God would raise him from the dead; for all this is said according to his being made man. Or perhaps, since women's breasts are said to begin to fill from the very moment of conception, he wished "from the breasts" to be understood so, as if he said: From the time I took flesh, a flesh for which immortality was to be hoped, so that there was no hope for him before, when he was in the form of God, in which nothing was to be changed for the better, but "from my mother's breasts," that is, from the very taking of flesh, which was conceived in hope, the reality of which hope was to come when he passed from death to immortality?

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:9 (21:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:10 (21:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:6: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:9–10 (21:10–11 LXX); Phil 2:6–7. The digital text's "ad ipsum legum" is evidently corrupt (perhaps for "Iesum"); it is translated by sense ("to him born of the virgin").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.31 (CSEL 44:181–182; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-31).

## Letter 140.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-32
- Source: CSEL 44:182–183
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine finds it hard to apply 'Upon you I was cast from the womb' to Christ himself, declines to speculate on when the soul enters the body, and prefers to read it of us in him.

### Latin text

Sed quod dictum est: In te iactatus sum ex utero, quo modo coaptari capiti possit, ignoro, quasi, in utero cum esset, non in deo fuit, in quo uiuimus, mouemur et sumus, aut illius infantis anima rationalis, ex quo caro processit ex utero, deum sperare coeperit. nisi forte credendum est iam nato animam rationalem accessisse, quae intra uiscera matris adhuc ei defuisset, et, quoniam eadem anima, quae carni iam natae addita est, deo inhaerebat, ideo secundum eandem carnem dictum esse existimandum est: In te iactatus sum ex utero, tamquam diceret: Eam sortitus sum animam ex utero, quae tibi cohaereret. sed quis audeat in hanc se temere praecipitare sententiam, cum ratio de aduentu uel exortu animae in tanto naturae profundo sic lateat, ut satius sit eam semper quaerere, quam diu in hac uita sumus, quam aliquando inuenisse praesumere? ex illa uero in se ipsum transfiguratione nostra quem ad modum possent haec accipi, dictum est. si quid autem conuenientius dici potuit uel potuerit, nullius praeiudicamus ingenio, doctrinae nullius inuidemus.

### English translation (Claude)

But how the words "Upon you I was cast from the womb" could be fitted to the head, I do not know: as though, when he was in the womb, he was not in God, in whom we live and move and have our being; or as though the rational soul of that infant, from whom the flesh came forth from the womb, began to hope in God. Unless perhaps we should believe that the rational soul came to him only when he was already born, having been lacking to him while still within his mother's body; and because that same soul, which was added to the flesh once born, clung to God, it should therefore be thought that "Upon you I was cast from the womb" was said according to that same flesh, as if he said: From the womb I received a soul that would cleave to you. But who would dare to throw himself rashly into this opinion, when the account of the coming or origin of the soul lies hidden in so great a depth of nature that it is better to seek it always, as long as we are in this life, than to presume that we have at some time found it? But how these words might be taken from that transfer of us into himself has been said. If anything more suitable could be said, or ever can be, we prejudge no one's talent and envy no one's learning.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:10 (21:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 17:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 17:28. Augustine leaves open the origin of the soul, a question he discusses at length elsewhere.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.32 (CSEL 44:182–183; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-32).

## Letter 140.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-33
- Source: CSEL 44:183–184
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'Do not depart from me, for tribulation is near' means that when the body is tortured, suffering comes nearest to the soul, which must struggle and pray not to fail in patience.

### Latin text

Iam illud, quod sequitur: Ne discedas a me, quoniam tribulatio proxima est, uide, ut inluminet, quem ad modum dictum sit: Quare me dereliquisti? quo modo enim dereliquit, cui dicitur: Ne discedas, nisi quia dereliquit uitae ueteris temporalem felicitatem? rogatur autem, ne discedat et deserat spem uitae aeternae. sed quid est quoniam tribulatio proxima est? quasi ei passio adhuc immineret, cum in ipsa media passione ista dicere intellegatur, quae de illo in hoc psalmo prophetata sunt. hic enim dicturus est etiam, quae in euangelio apertissime scripta sunt: Diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestem meam miserunt sortem, quod factum est, cum iam penderet in ligno. quid est ergo tribulatio proxima est, in qua media loquebatur? sed nimirum illud uult intellegi, quia, cum caro in doloribus est et in poenis, profecto anima tunc habet magnum agonem patientiae, in quo ne deficiat, laborandum et orandum est. nihil est autem animae sua carne propinquius. ideo mundi huius quilibet magnus perfectusque contemptor cum alibi patitur, nihil patitur. potest enim adhibere uigilem rationem, cum amittit bona, quae extrinsecus sunt et ab animo sapientis, qui ex cupiditate non haeret, sine dubio longe sunt, et non curare, quod patitur, quia nec patitur. cum uero amittit praecipua corporis bona, id est corporis uitam ac salutem, iam tribulatio proxima est animi bonis, quibus ipse intus tamquam corporis dominus est. quid facit qualibet ratione, ut non doleat, cum corpus uulneratur aut uritur, cui tanto implicatur consortio, pati possit, dolere non possit?

### English translation (Claude)

Now see how what follows, "Do not depart from me, for tribulation is near," sheds light on how "Why have you forsaken me?" was said. For how has he forsaken one to whom it is said, "Do not depart," except that he has forsaken the temporal happiness of the old life? But he is asked not to depart and abandon the hope of eternal life. But what does "for tribulation is near" mean? As if his passion were still impending, when he is understood to be saying these things, prophesied of him in this psalm, in the very midst of his passion. For here he is about to say also what is written most plainly in the Gospel: "They divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots," which was done when he was already hanging on the tree. What then does "tribulation is near" mean, when he was speaking in the midst of it? But no doubt he wishes this to be understood: that when the flesh is in pains and punishments, the soul then certainly has a great contest of patience, in which one must labor and pray not to fail. And nothing is nearer to the soul than its own flesh. Hence any great and perfect despiser of this world, when he suffers elsewhere, suffers nothing. For he can apply watchful reason when he loses goods that are external and doubtless far from the mind of the wise man, who does not cling to them by desire, and not care about what he suffers, because he does not suffer. But when he loses the chief goods of the body, that is, the body's life and health, then tribulation is near to the goods of the mind, in which the mind itself within is as it were the lord of the body. What can it do by any reasoning not to feel pain when the body is wounded or burned, the body with which it is bound in so close a fellowship, so that the body may suffer and the mind not feel pain?

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:11 (21:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:18 (21:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:11, 18 (21:12, 19 LXX); John 19:24. The final question is loosely constructed in the Latin; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.33 (CSEL 44:183–184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-33).

## Letter 140.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-34
- Source: CSEL 44:184
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As with Job, the devil first attacks external goods and then the body, so as to reach the goods of the mind; Job spoke differently when the tribulation came near.

### Latin text

Ideo et diabolus hunc nocendi ordinem tenens illius magni uiri, quem postulauerat temptandum, prius externa bona accepit in potestatem. quibus ablatis et perditis cum illum inconcussum uideret - dixerat enim: Dominus dedit, dominus abstulit; sicut domino placuit, ita factum est; sit nomen domini benedictum —, etiam carnem cruciandam uulnere postulauit tali cum eo confligens certamine, ut bona proxima inuaderet, hoc est corporis bona. quibus ille perditis si forte succumberet atque ad impietatem cor inclinaret, etiam bona animi deperirent, quibus perdendis iam in corpore saeuiens uicinus temptator instabat. denique ille uir in tanta temptatione, ubi erat animi bonis proxima tribulatio, quamuis multa prophetice loquatur, longe tamen aliter loquitur, quam cum illa externa deperissent bona, in quibus filios non amiserat, sed praemiserat.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence the devil too, keeping to this order of doing harm, first received power over the external goods of that great man whom he had demanded to tempt. When these had been taken away and lost and he saw him unshaken (for he had said, "The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; as it pleased the Lord, so it has been done; blessed be the name of the Lord"), he asked also that his flesh be tormented with a wound, contending with him in such a struggle as to attack the nearest goods, that is, the goods of the body. If, having lost these, he should perhaps give way and incline his heart to ungodliness, the goods of the mind too would perish; and to destroy them the tempter, now raging in the body close at hand, pressed on. In fact that man, in so great a temptation, when tribulation was near to the goods of the mind, although he says many things prophetically, nevertheless speaks very differently from when those external goods had been lost, among which he had not lost his sons, but sent them on ahead.

### Scripture references

- Job 1:12: allusion, high confidence
- Job 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Job 2:5: allusion, high confidence
- Job 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Job 1:12, 21; 2:5–7. The sons "sent ahead" (not lost) is Augustine's phrase about Job's children (cf. 140.26).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.34 (CSEL 44:184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-34).

## Letter 140.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-35
- Source: CSEL 44:184–185
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The martyr, afflicted in the flesh, prays not to be forsaken, since no friend, praise, or human virtue can help without God.

### Latin text

Clamat ergo martyris anima transfigurata in Christum, cum iam in carne tribulari coeperit, et dicit deo, a quo derelicta est in terrena felicitate, sed quae cum illo est in spe uitae aeternae: Ne discedas a me, quoniam tribulatio proxima est; non est in agro meo, non in auro, non in pecore, non in tectis atque parietibus, non in meorum orbitatibus, sed in carne mea est, cui copulor, cui conector, cuius sensum non habere non possum; unde me de proximo urget, ut a patientiae uirtute deficiam. ne discedas a me, quoniam non est, qui adiuuet neque amicus neque propinquus neque humana laus neque praeteritae recordatio uoluptatis neque aliquid eorum, quo terrenae felicitatis ruina fulcitur, neque ipsa, quae in animo meo est humana uirtus, quia, si tu deseris, quae hominis uirtus? quid est enim homo, nisi quod memor es eius?

### English translation (Claude)

So the soul of the martyr, transferred into Christ, cries out when it has begun to be afflicted in the flesh, and says to God, by whom it has been forsaken in earthly happiness, but with whom it is in the hope of eternal life: "Do not depart from me, for tribulation is near": it is not in my field, not in my gold, not in my cattle, not in my roofs and walls, not in the bereavement of my family, but it is in my flesh, to which I am joined, to which I am bound, whose feeling I cannot help having; so from close at hand it presses me to fail in the virtue of patience. "Do not depart from me, for there is none to help": neither friend nor kinsman nor human praise nor the memory of past pleasure nor anything of those things by which the ruin of earthly happiness is propped up, nor that human virtue itself which is in my mind; because, if you abandon me, what is man's virtue? For what is man, except that you are mindful of him?

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:11 (21:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 8:4 (8:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:11 (21:12 LXX); Ps 8:4 (8:5 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.35 (CSEL 44:184–185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-35).

## Letter 140.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-36
- Source: CSEL 44:185–187
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine expounds Psalm 22:12–14 of the passion: the bulls are the rulers, the scattered bones the apostles, and the melting heart either the fear and grief of Christ's weak members or the opening of the Scriptures.

### Latin text

Circumdederunt me uituli multi, hoc est minores in plebe. tauri pingues obsederunt me, hoc est superbi ac diuites, principes plebis. aperuerunt in me os suum — clamando: Crucifige, crucifige — quasi leo rapiens et rugiens; rapuerunt enim comprehensum adducentes ad praesidem et rugierunt petendo eius mortem. sicut aqua effusus sum, tamquam ut in me lapsi caderent persecutores mei. dispersa sunt omnia ossa mea; quid sunt ossa nisi corporis firmamenta? corpus autem Christi ecclesia: firmamenta ergo ecclesiae qui nisi apostoli, qui etiam columnae alibi appellantur? hi utique dispersi sunt, cum ad passionem ipse duceretur uel cum esset passus et mortuus. factum est cor meum tamquam cera liquescens in medio uentris mei. hoc sane quem ad modum capiti nostro, ipsius corporis saluatori coaptetur, inuenire difficile est. neque enim nisi magno pauore contingit, ut cor uelut cera liquescat humanum. quod unde in illo fieri posset, qui potestatem habebat ponendi et recipiendi animam suam? sed profecto aut infirmorum suorum in se transtulit causam siue illorum, qui mortis metu pauescunt sicut ipse Petrus ex egregio praesumptore tam creber negator effectus, siue illorum, qui tristitia salubri contabescunt sicut idem ipse Petrus, cum amare fleuit — nam et tristitia quasi soluit cor, unde dicitur etiam Graece quod appellata sit λύπη, aut certe profundum sacramentum nos intellegere uoluit, ut cordis sui nomine significaret scripturas suas, ubi eius utique latebat consilium, quod tunc apertum est, cum ea, quae de illo prophetata fuerunt, passus impleuit. solutae sunt ergo scripturae eius in his, quae perfecta sunt aduentu eius, natiuitate, passione, resurrectione, glorificatione. quis enim ea iam non intellegit in prophetis, quando usque ad intellectum etiam carnalis multitudinis peruenerunt? quam fortasse significauit medio uentris sui, ut in eius corpore, quod est ecclesia, quasi uentris locum habeat carnalis et infirmior multitudo, aut, si uentris nomen magis interioribus competit, ad eos potius perfectiorem scripturarum intellectum pertinere monstratum est, cum cor eius, id est scripturae eius, quae continent consilium eius, in medio eorum, hoc est in cogitatione eorum tamquam cera dissoluitur, hoc est feruore spiritus aperitur, disputatur, exponitur.

### English translation (Claude)

"Many calves surrounded me," that is, the lesser among the people. "Fat bulls besieged me," that is, the proud and rich, the rulers of the people. "They opened their mouth against me" (crying out, "Crucify, crucify") "like a lion ravening and roaring"; for they seized him when he was arrested, leading him to the governor, and they roared demanding his death. "I was poured out like water," as if so that my persecutors might slip and fall over me. "All my bones were scattered": what are bones but the supports of the body? Now the body of Christ is the church; who then are the supports of the church but the apostles, who are elsewhere also called pillars? These were certainly scattered when he himself was led to his passion, or when he had suffered and died. "My heart became like wax melting in the midst of my belly." How this is fitted to our head, the Savior of the body itself, is hard to find. For it happens only through great fear that a human heart melts like wax. How could this happen in him who had power to lay down his life and take it up again? But surely he either transferred to himself the case of his weak ones, either of those who tremble with fear of death, as Peter himself became from a bold boaster so frequent a denier, or of those who waste away with saving sorrow, as the same Peter did when he wept bitterly (for sorrow, as it were, dissolves the heart, which is why it is said to be called in Greek lypē); or certainly he wished us to understand a deep mystery, so that by the name of his heart he signified his Scriptures, where his counsel certainly lay hidden, which was opened when by suffering he fulfilled what had been prophesied of him. His Scriptures, then, were dissolved in the things that were accomplished by his coming, birth, passion, resurrection, and glorification. For who does not now understand them in the prophets, when they have reached the understanding even of the carnal multitude? This perhaps he signified by "the midst of his belly," so that in his body, which is the church, the carnal and weaker multitude holds as it were the place of the belly; or, if the name "belly" rather befits the inner parts, it is shown that the more perfect understanding of the Scriptures belongs rather to them, when his heart, that is, his Scriptures, which contain his counsel, in their midst, that is, in their thought, is dissolved like wax, that is, is opened, discussed, and expounded by the fervor of the Spirit.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:12 (21:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:13 (21:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:14 (21:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:6: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:24: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 14:50: allusion, medium confidence
- John 10:18: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:75: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:12–14 (21:13–15 LXX); John 19:6, 15; Col 1:18, 24; Gal 2:9; John 10:18; Matt 26:69–75. The Greek word is printed in the digital text as "λόπη"; corrected to λύπη ("grief"); Augustine's link between λύπη and "dissolving" (λύω) is his etymology.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.36 (CSEL 44:185–187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-36).

## Letter 140.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-37
- Source: CSEL 44:187
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The strength hardened like a potsherd is the church tested by suffering; the tongue cleaving to the jaws is Christ's silence, or preachers who keep close to his precepts.

### Latin text

Exaruit uelut testa uirtus mea. testa igne firmata est; sic et uirtus corporis Christi non sicut faenum igne consumitur, sed sicut testa passione uelut igne firmatur; uasa enim figuli probat fornax, sicut alio loco scriptura dicit, et homines iustos temptatio tribulationis. et lingua mea adhaesit faucibus meis. potest quidem silentium eius significatum uideri, quod et alius propheta commendat, cum dicit: Sicut agnus coram tondente fuit sine uoce; sed si linguam eius eos in eius corpore, quod est ecclesia, intellegamus, per quos suum loquitur euangelium, tunc eius faucibus adhaerent, cum a praeceptis eius non recedunt.

### English translation (Claude)

"My strength is dried up like a potsherd." A potsherd is hardened by fire; so the strength of the body of Christ is not consumed by fire like hay, but hardened by passion as by fire, like a potsherd; for "the furnace tries the potter's vessels," as Scripture says in another place, "and the trial of tribulation tries just men." "And my tongue has cleaved to my jaws." This may indeed seem to signify his silence, which another prophet also commends when he says, "Like a lamb before the shearer he was without voice"; but if we understand his tongue to be those in his body, which is the church, through whom he speaks his Gospel, then they cleave to his jaws when they do not depart from his precepts.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:15 (21:16 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 53:7: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 27:5 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:15 (21:16 LXX); Sir 27:5 (27:6 in some numberings; Old Latin); Isa 53:7 (cf. Acts 8:32).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.37 (CSEL 44:187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-37).

## Letter 140.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-38
- Source: CSEL 44:187–188
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'You brought me into the dust of death' cannot mean that Christ's body decayed; it refers to the martyrs of his body awaiting resurrection, or figuratively to his persecutors as dust.

### Latin text

Quod uero sequitur: Et in puluerem mortis deduxisti me. quo modo capiti coaptabitur, quando quidem corpus eius, quod tertio die resurrexit, non est utique in puluerem dissolutum? nec aliter exposuerunt apostoli, quod in alio psalmo positum est: Neque dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem, nisi quia eius caro non est corrupta, quae tam celeriter resurrexit. unde item in alio psalmo dicit: Quae utilitas in sanguine meo, dum descendo in corruptionem? numquid confitebitur tibi puluis aut adnuntiabit ueritatem tuam? hoc scilicet dicens, quod, si eo modo, quo et ceteri, mortuus dimitteretur in puluerem et caro eius resurrectioni ultimae seruaretur, nulla esset utilitas in sanguine eius, quia nihil prodesset mors eius nec adnuntiaretur ueritas dei, quae illum continuo resurrecturum esse praedixerat. quid sibi ergo uult, quod hoc loco ait: Et in puluerem mortis deduxisti me, nisi corpus eius accipiamus ecclesiam, in qua illi, qui pro eius nomine passi sunt uel patiuntur, non ita ut ipse cito resurgunt, sed in mortis puluerem deducuntur tunc resurrecturi, cum illud tempus uenerit, de quo in euangelio dicit: Veniet hora, quando omnes, qui sunt in monumentis, audient uocem eius et procedent? aut certe tropice puluerem mortis ipsos Iudaeos intellegi uoluit, in quorum manus deductus est; scriptum est enim: Non sic impii, non sic; sed tamquam puluis, quem proicit uentus a facie terrae.

### English translation (Claude)

But how will what follows, "And you have brought me down into the dust of death," be fitted to the head, since his body, which rose on the third day, was certainly not dissolved into dust? Nor did the apostles expound what is set down in another psalm, "Nor will you let your holy one see corruption," otherwise than that his flesh, which rose so quickly, was not corrupted. Hence likewise he says in another psalm: "What profit is there in my blood, while I go down into corruption? Will dust confess to you or proclaim your truth?", saying this, namely, that if, dead, he were left in the dust in the same way as the rest, and his flesh were kept for the last resurrection, there would be no profit in his blood, because his death would be of no benefit, nor would the truth of God be proclaimed, which had foretold that he would rise at once. What then does he mean by saying in this place, "And you have brought me down into the dust of death," unless we take his body to be the church, in which those who have suffered or suffer for his name do not rise quickly as he did, but are brought down into the dust of death, to rise then, when that time comes of which he says in the Gospel, "The hour will come when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come forth"? Or else, figuratively, he wished the Jews themselves, into whose hands he was brought down, to be understood as the dust of death; for it is written: "Not so the ungodly, not so; but like the dust which the wind drives from the face of the earth."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:15 (21:16 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:10 (15:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:31: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 13:37: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 30:9 (29:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 5:28: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 1:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:15 (21:16 LXX); Ps 16:10 (15:10 LXX) with Acts 2:27–31, 13:35–37; Ps 30:9 (29:10 LXX); John 5:28–29; Ps 1:4 (Old Latin, following the LXX). The reading of "dust" as the Jews who handed him over is offered as an alternative ("or else"); translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.38 (CSEL 44:187–188; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-38).

## Letter 140.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-39
- Source: CSEL 44:188–189
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Psalm 22:16–17 describes the crucifixion: the dogs are his persecutors, the pierced hands and feet the nails, and those who looked on waited to see whether Elijah would save him.

### Latin text

Denique sequitur: Quoniam circumdederunt me canes multi, concilium malignantium circumdederunt me, tamquam ipsos dixerit puluerem mortis, in quem deductus est. quos dixit canes multos et concilium malignantium canes uidelicet eos appellans, qui plerumque contra innocentes latrant, cum quibus non habent consuetudinem. iam uero in his, quae subiungit, tamquam euangelium recitatur. crucifixio quippe eius exprimitur in eo, quod dicit: Foderunt manus meas et pedes meos, dinumerauerunt omnia ossa mea: ipsi uero considerauerunt et conspexerunt me. fossae sunt enim clauis manus et pedes eius et, cum extenderetur in ligno, quodam modo numerata sunt ossa eius. consideratus est autem atque conspectus, quid illi futurum esset et utrum ueniret Helias et liberaret eum.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally there follows: "For many dogs have surrounded me; the council of evildoers has surrounded me," as if he had called these the dust of death into which he was brought down. He called them many dogs and the council of evildoers, calling them dogs, namely, because dogs mostly bark against innocent people with whom they are not familiar. Now in what he adds the Gospel is read out, as it were. For his crucifixion is expressed in his saying: "They dug my hands and my feet; they numbered all my bones; but they considered and looked upon me." For his hands and feet were dug by the nails, and when he was stretched out on the tree his bones were in a way numbered. And he was considered and looked upon, to see what would happen to him, and whether Elijah would come and deliver him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:16 (21:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:17 (21:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 27:49: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:16–17 (21:17–18 LXX, Old Latin "foderunt"); Matt 27:49.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.39 (CSEL 44:188–189; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-39).

## Letter 140.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-40
- Source: CSEL 44:189
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ prays in the person of the head and of the church that God's help not be far off; enemies who kill the flesh do no harm if the soul does not consent to evil.

### Latin text

Iam illud, quod sequitur, nullius expositionis indiget: Diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestem meam miserunt sortem. uerba deinde, quae subtexuntur, orantis sunt tam ex persona capitis, id est hominis mediatoris, quam ex persona corporis, quod est ecclesia, quam dicit etiam unicam suam. tu autem, domine, inquit, ne longe feceris auxilium tuum. hoc ad eius carnem pertinet, cuius resurrectio non in longum missa est ut aliorum. in defensionem meam aspice, ne quid noceant inimici, qui sibi uidentur aliquid potuisse carnem perimendo mortalem. non autem nocent, si defendente gratia dei non eis ad malum anima superata consentiat; sicut enim et alibi prophetatum est, terra tradita est in manus impii, hoc est caro terrena.

### English translation (Claude)

What follows next needs no exposition: "They divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots." Then the words that are added are those of one praying, both in the person of the head, that is, of the man who is mediator, and in the person of the body, which is the church, which he also calls his only one. "But you, Lord," he says, "do not put your help far off." This refers to his flesh, whose resurrection was not put off for long, as that of others is. "Look to my defense," so that the enemies may do no harm, who think they have been able to do something by killing mortal flesh. But they do no harm if, defended by the grace of God, the soul is not overcome and does not consent to them in evil; for, as has been prophesied elsewhere, "the earth has been given into the hands of the ungodly," that is, the earthly flesh.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:18 (21:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:19 (21:20 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Job 9:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:18–20 (21:19–21 LXX); Job 9:24. "His only one" alludes to Ps 22:20 ("my only one", unicam meam, of the soul or church).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.40 (CSEL 44:189; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-40).

## Letter 140.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-41
- Source: CSEL 44:189–190
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'Deliver my soul from the sword' refers figuratively to the tongues of Christ's persecutors, or to the sword that would kill his martyrs, whose souls he asks to be delivered.

### Latin text

Erue a framea animam meam. framea gladius est; nec utique tali ferro sed cruce occisus est Christus nec latus eius gladio sed lancea percusserunt. translato ergo uerbo frameam linguam dixit persequentium, sicut in alio psalmo dicitur: Et lingua eorum gladius acutus. unde, quia in eius carne lingua praeualuit malignorum, orat, ut animae nihil noceat, cum dicit: Erue a framea animam meam, ut haec in prophetia oratio, si ad caput corporis referas, non uideatur uelut indigentis petitio sed potius rei futurae figurata praedictio. aut certe, quia corpus eius, hoc est ecclesia graues persecutiones fuerat perpessura, frameam dixit, qua maxime trucidati sunt martyres; unde uult eorum animas erui, ne timeant eos, qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere, et consentiant ad inlicita. aut etiam in ipsorum passionibus inimicorum linguam frameam dicit. unde animam suam, hoc est animam corporis sui, animam sanctorum suorum uult erui.

### English translation (Claude)

"Deliver my soul from the sword." The framea is a sword; but Christ was certainly not killed with such a weapon but by the cross, nor did they pierce his side with a sword but with a lance. By a transferred word, then, he called the tongue of his persecutors a sword, as it is said in another psalm: "And their tongue a sharp sword." Hence, because the tongue of the wicked prevailed over his flesh, he prays that it may do no harm to his soul, when he says, "Deliver my soul from the sword"; so that this prayer in prophecy, if you refer it to the head of the body, may seem not the petition of one in need but rather a figurative prediction of what was to come. Or else, because his body, that is, the church, was going to suffer grievous persecutions, he spoke of the sword, by which the martyrs were mostly slaughtered; hence he wishes their souls to be delivered, so that they may not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul, and consent to unlawful things. Or again, in their own sufferings he calls the tongue of the enemies a sword. Hence he wishes his soul, that is, the soul of his body, the soul of his saints, to be delivered.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:34: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 57:4 (56:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX); John 19:34; Ps 57:4 (56:5 LXX); Matt 10:28. "Framea" is the Old Latin word for sword in this psalm.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.41 (CSEL 44:189–190; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-41).

## Letter 140.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-42
- Source: CSEL 44:190–191
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'My only one' is the one church, the 'dog' is the world, the 'lion' its hostile power and the devil, and the 'unicorns' the proud who oppose humble Christians.

### Latin text

Quod autem sequitur: Et de manu canis unicam meam, nihil aptius quam unica ecclesia mihi uidetur intellegi. canem uero mundum appellauit non ratione sed consuetudine contra insolitam ueritatem latrantem. haec est enim canum natura, ut, cum quibus habent consuetudinem, siue illi boni siue mali sint, non ad eos latrent, insolitorum autem personis uisis etiam innocentibus inritentur. manu autem canis potestatem mundi significauit, cuius etiam regnum infestum futurum corpori suo, id est ecclesiae suae leonis nomine figurauit in eo, quod adiunxit: Saluum me fac de ore leonis. unde scriptum est: Nihil interest inter minas regis et iram leonis, quamquam et diabolum apostolus Petrus leoni comparet rugienti et quaerenti circumeundo, quem deuoret. superbosque huius mundi Christianis humilibus aduersaturos ostendens consequenter dicit: Et a cornibus unicornuorum humilitatem meam. ideo quippe in unicornibus superbi intelleguntur, quia superbia odit consortium et, quantum in ipso est, solus cupit eminere omnis superbus.

### English translation (Claude)

What follows, "And my only one from the hand of the dog," seems to me most fittingly understood as the one church. He called the world a dog, barking against an unfamiliar truth not by reason but by habit. For this is the nature of dogs, that they do not bark at those with whom they are familiar, whether these are good or bad, but are provoked at the sight of unfamiliar persons, even innocent ones. By the hand of the dog he signified the power of the world, whose rule, which would be hostile to his body, that is, to his church, he also figured by the name of a lion in what he added: "Save me from the mouth of the lion." Hence it is written: "There is no difference between the threats of a king and the anger of a lion"; although the apostle Peter also compares the devil to a lion roaring and going about seeking whom he may devour. And showing that the proud of this world would oppose humble Christians, he goes on to say: "And my lowliness from the horns of the unicorns." For the proud are understood by the unicorns because pride hates fellowship, and every proud man, as far as he can, desires to stand out alone.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:21 (21:22 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 19:12: quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 5:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:20–21 (21:21–22 LXX, Old Latin); Prov 19:12 (Old Latin, "there is no difference"); 1 Pet 5:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.42 (CSEL 44:190–191; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-42).

## Letter 140.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-43
- Source: CSEL 44:191–192
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The fruit of Christ's forsaking appears in the psalm's turn to praise: he declares God's name to his brothers in the one Catholic Church spread through all nations.

### Latin text

Iam nunc adtende, ubi sit fructus, uel quod derelictus est, ne exaudiretur pro terrena felicitate non ad insipientiam, sed ut saperemus, quid noui testamenti gratia desiderare debeamus, uel quod non est derelictus sed exauditus in eo, quod ait: Ne discedas a me, qui dixerat: Quare me dereliquisti? quod utique contrarium est, nisi illud ad aliud, hoc ad aliud referatur. adtende et audi, quantum sapis, hauri, quantum capis quantumque ipse rem tantam eloqui ualeo, immo quantum tribuit ille, qui nos exaudit, et in Christo, in quantum homo mediator est inter nos et deum, et cum Christo, in quantum deus est aequalis deo et potens est facere, ut ait apostolus, supra quam petimus aut intellegimus, uide in hoc psalmo testamenti noui gratiam. uide, illius derelictionis, tribulationis, deprecationis fructu quid agatur, quid insinuetur, quid commendetur, quid inlustretur. intuere, quid legamus tanto ante prophetatum, quid iam cernamus impletum. narrabo, inquit, nomen tuum fratribus meis; in medio ecclesiae cantabo te. fratres illi sunt, de quibus in euangelio ait: Vade et dic fratribus meis. ecclesia illa est, quam modo dixit unicam suam; haec est unica catholica, quae toto orbe copiosa diffunditur, quae usque ad ultimas gentes crescendo porrigitur, unde in euangelio dicit: Et praedicabitur hoc euangelium in uniuerso orbe in testimonium omnibus gentibus et tunc ueniet finis.

### English translation (Claude)

Now attend to where the fruit is, either of his being forsaken, so that he was not heard for earthly happiness, "not for folly," but that we might become wise as to what we ought to desire by the grace of the New Testament; or of his not being forsaken but heard in what he said, "Do not depart from me," he who had said, "Why have you forsaken me?" (which is certainly contradictory, unless the one is referred to one thing and the other to another). Attend and listen as far as you understand, drink in as much as you can take, and as far as I myself am able to speak of so great a matter, or rather as far as he grants it who hears us, both in Christ, in so far as he is man, the mediator between us and God, and with Christ, in so far as he is God equal to God, and is able, as the apostle says, to do beyond what we ask or understand: see the grace of the New Testament in this psalm. See what is done, what is suggested, what is commended, what is brought to light by the fruit of that forsaking, tribulation, and prayer. Consider what we read prophesied so long before, and what we now see fulfilled. "I will tell your name to my brothers," he says; "in the midst of the church I will sing to you." Those brothers are the ones of whom he says in the Gospel, "Go and tell my brothers." That church is the one he just called his only one: this is the one Catholic Church, abundantly spread throughout the whole world, which by growing extends even to the farthest nations; hence he says in the Gospel, "And this Gospel will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:22 (21:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:20: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 28:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 20:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 24:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:2, 11, 1, 22 (21:3, 12, 2, 23 LXX); Eph 3:20; John 20:17 (cf. Matt 28:10); Matt 24:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.43 (CSEL 44:191–192; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-43).

## Letter 140.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-44
- Source: CSEL 44:192–193
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The 'new song' is sung by Christ in us, in the church spread over all the earth; it is the praise of God sung in the heart.

### Latin text

Quod autem ait: Cantabo, hoc est illud canticum nouum, de quo in alio psalmo dicitur: Cantate domino canticum nouum, cantate domino omnis terra. habes hic utraque, et quo cantico cantaturum se dixerit et in cuius ecclesiae medio; illud pertinet ad canticum nouum, haec ad omnem terram. ipse quippe cantat in nobis, cuius gratia cantamus, sicut dicit apostolus: An uultis experimentum eius accipere, qui in me loquitur Christus? medium uero ecclesiae uel ad eminentiam licet referas et ipsam manifestationem, quia omnia quanto clarius nota sunt, tanto magis in medio esse dicuntur, uel certe ad interiores ecclesiae, quia interiora sunt media. neque enim omnis, qui labiis personat, cantat canticum nouum, sed qui eo modo cantat, ut apostolus admonet dicens: Cantantes et psallentes in cordibus uestris domino. intus est enim hoc gaudium, ubi uox laudis et canitur et auditur; qua uoce laudatur, qui gratis amandus est toto corde, tota anima, tota mente amatoremque suum accendit in se gratia spiritus sui sancti; quid enim aliud est canticum nouum quam laus dei?

### English translation (Claude)

And when he says, "I will sing," this is that new song of which it is said in another psalm: "Sing to the Lord a new song; sing to the Lord, all the earth." You have both here: with what song he said he would sing, and in the midst of what church; the one belongs to the new song, the other to all the earth. For he sings in us, by whose grace we sing, as the apostle says: "Or do you want proof of him who speaks in me, Christ?" As for "the midst of the church," you may refer it either to prominence and manifestation itself, since the more clearly things are known, the more they are said to be in the midst; or else to the inner members of the church, since what is inner is in the middle. For not everyone who sounds with his lips sings the new song, but he who sings in the way the apostle admonishes, saying: "singing and making melody to the Lord in your hearts." For this joy is within, where the voice of praise is both sung and heard; by this voice he is praised who is to be loved freely with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole mind, and who by the grace of his Holy Spirit kindles his lover toward himself. For what else is the new song but the praise of God?

### Scripture references

- Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 13:3: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:19: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:37: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX); 2 Cor 13:3; Eph 5:19; Matt 22:37.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.44 (CSEL 44:192–193; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-44).

## Letter 140.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-45
- Source: CSEL 44:193–194
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'You who fear the Lord, praise him' means 'love him'; fear is the beginning of wisdom, preparing a place for love, which then casts out fear.

### Latin text

Denique sequitur et euidentius hoc demonstrat. cum enim dixisset: Narrabo nomen tuum fratribus meis, quia deum nemo uidit umquam, sed unigenitus filius, qui est in sinu patris, ipse enarrauit, atque adiunxisset: In medio ecclesiae cantabo te, quo modo cantauit, id est quia in nobis cantauit, cum proficimus in nomine, quod narrauit fratribus suis, et quia laudem dei cantauit in nobis, continuo manifestauit dicens: Qui timetis dominum, laudate eum. quis autem ueraciter laudat, nisi qui sinceriter amat? tantundem est ergo, ac si diceret: Qui timetis dominum, amate eum. dixit enim homini, sicut scriptum est, ecce pietas est sapientia. porro pietas cultus dei est nec colitur ille nisi amando. summa igitur et uera sapientia est in praecepto illo primo: Diliges dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua, ac per hoc sapientia est caritas dei nec diffunditur in cordibus nostris nisi per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. initium autem sapientiae timor domini et timor non est in caritate, sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem. proinde praemissus timor in cor nostrum pellit inde consuetudinem malorum operum et seruat caritati locum, qua tamquam domina ueniente, ut illa insidat, abscedit.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, what follows shows this more clearly. For when he had said, "I will tell your name to my brothers" (because no one has ever seen God, but the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known), and had added, "In the midst of the church I will sing to you," he at once made clear how he sang, that is, that he sang in us when we make progress in the name he made known to his brothers, and that he sang the praise of God in us, saying: "You who fear the Lord, praise him." And who praises truly but one who loves sincerely? It is just as if he said, "You who fear the Lord, love him." For he said to man, as it is written, "Behold, piety is wisdom." Now piety is the worship of God, and he is not worshiped except by loving. The highest and true wisdom, then, is in that first commandment: "You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul"; and so wisdom is the love of God, and it is poured out in our hearts only through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. "But the beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord," and "there is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear." So fear, sent ahead into our heart, drives out from it the habit of evil works and keeps a place for love; and when love comes like a mistress, fear withdraws so that she may take her seat.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:22 (21:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Job 28:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:37: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 111:10 (110:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:22–23 (21:23–24 LXX); John 1:18; Job 28:28 (Old Latin, following the LXX "piety is wisdom"); Matt 22:37; Rom 5:5; Ps 111:10 (110:10 LXX); 1 John 4:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.45 (CSEL 44:193–194; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-45).

## Letter 140.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-46
- Source: CSEL 44:194
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Under the Old Testament people feared God and offered bloody sacrifices without understanding them; under the New the sacrifice is praise, and God's salvation is Christ, as Simeon recognized.

### Latin text

Ergo, qui timetis dominum, laudate eum. ut deum non seruiliter sed libere colatis, amare discite, quem timetis, et poteritis laudare, quod amatis. timentes enim deum homines ueteris testamenti propter litteram terrentem et occidentem nondum habentes spiritum uiuificantem currebant cum sacrificiis ad templum et quamuis in figuram futuri sanguinis, quo redempti sumus, tamen nescientes, quid per eas praefiguraretur, cruentas uictimas immolabant. nunc uero in gratia testamenti noui qui timetis dominum, laudate eum. ipse quippe in alio psalmo mutanda illa praenuntians, quae tunc in umbra futuri offerebantur: Non accipiam, inquit, de manu tua uitulos neque de gregibus tuis hircos. et paulo post, ut ostenderet sacrificium noui testamenti, quando illa fuerant cessatura: Immola, inquit, deo sacrificium laudis et redde altissimo uota tua. et in fine eiusdem psalmi: Sacrificium, inquit, laudis glorificabit me et illic uia est, qua ostendam illi salutare meum. salutare dei Christus est, quem infantem Symeon senex cum agnouisset in spiritu eumque sumpsisset in manus: Nunc dimittis, inquit, domine, seruum tuum secundum uerbum tuum in pace, quoniam uiderunt oculi mei salutare tuum.

### English translation (Claude)

"You, then, who fear the Lord, praise him." So that you may worship God not as slaves but as free, learn to love him whom you fear, and you will be able to praise what you love. For the people of the Old Testament, fearing God because of the letter that terrifies and kills, not yet having the Spirit that gives life, ran with sacrifices to the temple, and offered bloody victims, as a figure, indeed, of the blood to come by which we have been redeemed, yet not knowing what was prefigured by them. But now, in the grace of the New Testament, "you who fear the Lord, praise him." For he himself, foretelling in another psalm that those things which were then offered in the shadow of what was to come would be changed, says: "I will not take calves from your hand, nor goats from your flocks." And a little later, to show the sacrifice of the New Testament, when those were to cease, he says: "Offer to God a sacrifice of praise, and pay your vows to the Most High." And at the end of the same psalm he says: "The sacrifice of praise will glorify me, and there is the way by which I will show him my salvation." The salvation of God is Christ, whom the aged Simeon, when he had recognized him as an infant in the Spirit and taken him in his hands, said: "Now, Lord, you let your servant go in peace according to your word, for my eyes have seen your salvation."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 10:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 50:9 (49:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:14 (49:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 50:23 (49:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 2:28: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 2:29: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 2:30: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX); 2 Cor 3:6; Ps 50:9, 14, 23 (49:9, 14, 23 LXX); Heb 10:1; Luke 2:28–30. The remark that the people did not know what the sacrifices prefigured is Augustine's; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.46 (CSEL 44:194; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-46).

## Letter 140.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-47
- Source: CSEL 44:194–195
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'All the seed of Jacob' includes all who believe in Christ, the children of promise prefigured by Isaac, not Ishmael.

### Latin text

Qui ergo timetis dominum, laudate eum; uniuersum semen Iacob, magnificate eum. non uacat, quod ei non sufficit dicere semen Iacob, nisi adderet uniuersum, ne in solis eis intellegeretur, qui ex Israhelitis fuerant credituri. semen enim Iacob ipsum est semen Abrahae; omnibus autem in Christum credentibus, non solis qui ex Israhel fideles erant, apostolus dicit: Ergo Abrahae semen estis, secundum promissionem heredes. ibi namque commemorauit praefigurationem noui testamenti in eo, quod scriptum est: In Isaac uocabitur tibi semen, non utique in Ismahel, ancillae filio. in quibus duobus filiis Abrahae, seruo et libero, et duabus mulieribus, ancilla et libera, scribens ad Galatas duo testamenta dicit in allegoria praefigurata. unde dicit: Non hi, qui filii carnis, hi sunt filii dei, sed filii promissionis deputantur in semen. promissionis enim uerbum hoc est: Ad hoc tempus ueniam et erit Sarrae filius.

### English translation (Claude)

"You, then, who fear the Lord, praise him; all the seed of Jacob, magnify him." It is not idle that it was not enough for him to say "the seed of Jacob" without adding "all", lest it be understood only of those of the Israelites who were going to believe. For the seed of Jacob is the same as the seed of Abraham; and to all who believe in Christ, not only to those of Israel who were believers, the apostle says: "Then you are the seed of Abraham, heirs according to the promise." For there he recalled the prefiguration of the New Testament in what is written: "In Isaac shall your seed be called," certainly not in Ishmael, the son of the slave woman. In these two sons of Abraham, the slave and the free, and the two women, the slave woman and the free, he says, writing to the Galatians, that the two testaments were prefigured in an allegory. Hence he says: "It is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as seed." For this is the word of promise: "At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:29: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 21:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:9: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 18:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX); Gal 3:29; Gen 21:12 (Rom 9:7); Gal 4:22–26; Rom 9:8–9 (Gen 18:10).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.47 (CSEL 44:194–195; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-47).

## Letter 140.48

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-48
- Source: CSEL 44:195–196
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God foretells sins, threatens punishments, and promises benefits; the children of promise are children of grace, freely given; the thanksgiving in the New Testament sacrifice will be explained after baptism.

### Latin text

Multum est et nimis longum diligenter enucleare, cur filii promissionis pertinentes ad Isaac noui testamenti gratiae deputentur. breuiter tamen adtingam, unde tanto fructuosius cogitabis, quanto magis pie cogitaueris. non omnia deus, quae praedicit, promittit; praedicit enim etiam illa, quae non ipse facit, quia est omnium praescius futurorum. praedicit ergo et peccata hominum, quae potuit praescire, non facere. promittit autem, quae ipse facturus est, nec ea mala sed bona. quis enim promittat mala? quamuis itaque mala inferat malis, non peccata sed supplicia, minatur tamen ea potius, quam promittit. omnia largitur et praescit, sed peccata praedicit, supplicia minatur, beneficia pollicetur. filii ergo promissionis filii sunt beneficii. haec est gratia, quae gratis datur non meritis operantis sed miseratione donantis. hinc gratias agimus domino deo nostro, quod est magnum sacramentum in sacrificio noui testamenti, quod et ubi et quando et quo modo offeratur. cum fueris baptizatus, inuenies.

### English translation (Claude)

It would be a great and very long task to explain carefully why the children of the promise, belonging to Isaac, are counted as belonging to the grace of the New Testament. Yet I will touch on it briefly; you will reflect on it the more fruitfully, the more devoutly you reflect. God does not promise all that he foretells; for he also foretells things that he does not do himself, since he foreknows all future things. He foretells, then, even the sins of human beings, which he could foreknow, not do. But he promises what he himself is going to do, and these are not evils but goods. For who would promise evils? So although he inflicts evils on the evil, not sins but punishments, he threatens them rather than promises them. He bestows all good things and foreknows all things; but sins he foretells, punishments he threatens, benefits he promises. The children of the promise, then, are children of benefit. This is grace, which is given freely, not by the merits of one who works but by the mercy of one who gives. Hence we give thanks to the Lord our God, which is a great sacrament in the sacrifice of the New Testament; where, when, and how it is offered you will find out when you have been baptized.

### Translation notes

- The "sacrifice of the New Testament" with its thanksgiving ("gratias agamus domino deo nostro") is the Eucharist; Honoratus was evidently not yet baptized, and its rite was not explained to the unbaptized (the discipline of the secret).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.48 (CSEL 44:195–196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-27/#p-140-48).

## Letter 140.49

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-49
- Source: CSEL 44:196
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Why does the psalm, after 'praise him', say 'let all the seed of Israel fear him', when love casts out fear? Paul too prescribes fear to the Gentiles grafted onto the olive tree.

### Latin text

Deinde sequitur et dicit: Timeat eum omne semen Israhel. quia Iacob ipse et Israhel unus homo erat habens duo nomina, non in paruo sacramento — sed uno libro non possumus dicere omnia, in quo iam multum progressi sumus et nondum de aliis tribus quaestionibus aliquid diximus, hoc est de tenebris exterioribus et latitudine, longitudine, altitudine ac profundo et de quinque et quinque uirginibus —, quod ergo supra dixit uniuersum semen Iacob, hoc consequenter ait omne semen Israhel. sed quare superius magnificate eum et posterius timeat eum? magnificatio laudi congruit, de qua dixerat: Qui timetis dominum, laudate eum, unde iam multa disserui. ibi quippe amor uel caritas dei, quae perfecta foras mittit timorem. cur ergo iterum: Timeat eum omne semen Israhel? non enim accepistis, inquit apostolus, spiritum seruitutis iterum in timore. sed idem ipse apostolus oleastro inserto in oliua timorem praecipit, hoc est gentibus additis radici Abraham, Isaac, Iacob, ut et ipsae fierent Israhel, id est pertinerent ad semen Abrahae.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he goes on to say: "Let all the seed of Israel fear him." Since Jacob and Israel were one man with two names (not without a great sacrament; but we cannot say everything in one book, in which we have already gone far and have not yet said anything on the other three questions, that is, on the outer darkness, on the breadth, length, height, and depth, and on the five and five virgins), what he said above, "all the seed of Jacob," he says accordingly here as "all the seed of Israel." But why above "magnify him" and afterward "let them fear him"? Magnifying suits praise, of which he had said, "You who fear the Lord, praise him," on which I have already said much. For there is the love or charity of God, which, being perfect, casts out fear. Why then again, "Let all the seed of Israel fear him"? "For you did not receive," says the apostle, "the spirit of slavery again in fear." But the same apostle prescribes fear to the wild olive grafted into the olive, that is, to the Gentiles added to the root of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, so that they too might become Israel, that is, belong to the seed of Abraham.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gen 32:28: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX); Gen 32:28; 1 John 4:18; Rom 8:15; Rom 11:17–20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.49 (CSEL 44:196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-49).

## Letter 140.50

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-50
- Source: CSEL 44:196–198
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's words about the centurion foretold the grafting of humble Gentiles and the breaking off of those who, seeking their own righteousness, refused the grace of the promise and go into the outer darkness.

### Latin text

Quam insertionem oleastri amputatis propter infidelitatis superbiam naturalibus ramis etiam ipse dominus in euangelio praedixit occasione illius centurionis, qui in eum ex gentibus credidit. tunc enim ait: Amen dico uobis; non inueni tantam fidem in Israhel, et adiunxit: Ideo dico uobis, quia multi ab oriente et occidente uenient et recumbent cum Abraham, Isaac et Iacob in regno caelorum; filii autem regni ibunt in tenebras exteriores; illic erit ploratio et stridor dentium, ita significans inseri oleastrum propter humilitatem — dixerat quippe ille centurio: Non sum dignus, ut sub tectum meum intres, sed tantum dic uerbo et sanabitur puer meus —, confractionem autem ramorum naturalium propter superbiam eorum scilicet, qui ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. de his quippe uana elatione tumentibus dictum est, quod ibunt in tenebras exteriores, quia iactantes se de semine Abrahae semen Abrahae fieri noluerunt, ut essent filii promissionis; quia fidem noui testamenti non receperunt, ubi dei iustitia commendatur, suam constituere uolentes, id est tamquam de suis meritis et operibus praefidentes spreuerunt esse filii promissionis, hoc est filii gratiae, filii misericordiae, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur credens in eum, qui iustificat impium, hoc est qui ex impio facit pium, ut deputetur fides eius ad iustitiam et impleatur in eo, non quod postulabat eius meritum, sed quod a domino promissum est beneficium.

### English translation (Claude)

This grafting of the wild olive, after the natural branches were cut off because of the pride of unbelief, the Lord himself also foretold in the Gospel, on the occasion of that centurion who believed in him from among the Gentiles. For then he said: "Truly I say to you, I have not found such faith in Israel"; and he added: "Therefore I say to you that many will come from east and west and will recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; but the sons of the kingdom will go into the outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." So he signified that the wild olive is grafted in because of humility (for that centurion had said, "I am not worthy that you should come under my roof, but only say the word and my servant will be healed"), and that the natural branches were broken off because of their pride, namely of those who, being ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, did not submit to the righteousness of God. For of these, swollen with vain elation, it was said that they will go into the outer darkness, because, boasting of being the seed of Abraham, they refused to become the seed of Abraham so as to be children of the promise; because they did not receive the faith of the New Testament, in which the righteousness of God is commended, wishing to establish their own, that is, trusting as it were in their own merits and works, they scorned to be children of the promise, that is, children of grace, children of mercy, so that "he who glories may glory in the Lord," believing in him who justifies the ungodly, that is, who makes the ungodly godly, so that his faith may be counted as righteousness, and that may be fulfilled in him which not his merit demanded but which the Lord promised as a benefit.

### Scripture references

- Matt 8:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:11: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:20: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 8:8–12; Rom 11:17–20; Rom 10:3; 1 Cor 1:31; Rom 4:5. The statements about the Jews who did not believe are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.50 (CSEL 44:196–198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-50).

## Letter 140.51

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-51
- Source: CSEL 44:198
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul tells the grafted Gentiles not to be proud but to fear, since salvation is God's gift; this fear of losing grace differs from the servile fear of punishment.

### Latin text

Cum his igitur agens apostolus, qui oliuae per gratiam inserebantur: Dicis, inquit, fracti sunt rami, ut ego inserar. bene; propter incredulitatem fracti sunt. tu autem fide sta, noli altum sapere, sed time. dei est enim beneficium, non meritum tuum; quod et alibi dicit: Gratia salui facti estis per fidem et hoc non ex uobis, sed dei donum est, non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur. ipsius enim sumus figmentum creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis, quae praeparauit deus, ut in illis ambulemus. in hoc itaque intellectu gratiae inest timor, de quo dicitur: Noli altum sapere, sed time. timor autem iste alius est; non est ille seruilis, quem caritas foras mittit. illo enim timetur, ne incidatur in tormentum supplicii, isto autem, ne amittatur gratia beneficii.

### English translation (Claude)

So the apostle, dealing with those who were being grafted into the olive by grace, says: "You will say, the branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in. Well; they were broken off because of unbelief. But you stand by faith; do not be high-minded, but fear." For it is God's benefit, not your merit; as he says elsewhere too: "By grace you have been saved through faith, and this not from yourselves, but it is the gift of God; not from works, lest anyone be lifted up. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared that we should walk in them." In this understanding of grace, then, there is the fear of which it is said, "Do not be high-minded, but fear." But this fear is a different one; it is not that servile fear which love casts out. For with that one we fear falling into the torment of punishment, but with this one we fear losing the grace of the benefit.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:20: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:19–20; Eph 2:8–10; 1 John 4:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.51 (CSEL 44:198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-51).

## Letter 140.52

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-52
- Source: CSEL 44:198–199
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Though believers have the spirit of adoption, not of fear, they must still fear lest they grow proud, since their righteousness is received from God.

### Latin text

Quapropter quamuis fidelibus ad nouum testamentum pertinentibus dicat apostolus, quod paulo ante commemoraui: Non enim accepistis spiritum seruitutis iterum in timorem, sed accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, pater, id est ut fides in nobis sit, quae per dilectionem operatur, non tam timendo poenam quam amando iustitiam, tamen, quia non fit anima iusta nisi participatione melioris, qui iustificat impium — quid enim habet, quod non accepit? -, non debet sibi tribuendo, quod dei est, ita gloriari, tamquam non acceperit. ob hoc ei dictum est: Noli altum sapere, sed time. et timor iste praecipitur etiam his, qui ex fide uiuentes heredes sunt noui testamenti atque in libertatem uocati. altum enim sapere dictum est superbire, quod alio loco e contrario satis ostendit, ubi ait: Non alta sapientes sed humilibus consentientes. ex hoc, quod ait humilibus consentientes, utique aperuit nihil aliud se dixisse alta sapientes quam superbientes.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, although the apostle says to the faithful belonging to the New Testament, as I mentioned a little earlier, "For you did not receive the spirit of slavery again in fear, but you received the spirit of adoption as sons, in which we cry, Abba, Father," that is, so that there may be in us the faith that works through love, not so much fearing punishment as loving righteousness; yet, because the soul does not become righteous except by participation in a better one, who justifies the ungodly (for what does it have that it has not received?), it ought not, by attributing to itself what is God's, to glory as if it had not received it. For this reason it is told: "Do not be high-minded, but fear." And this fear is prescribed even to those who, living by faith, are heirs of the New Testament and called into freedom. For "to be high-minded" means to be proud, as he shows clearly enough in another place by the opposite, where he says, "not minding high things, but agreeing with the lowly." By saying "agreeing with the lowly," he certainly made plain that by "minding high things" he meant nothing else than being proud.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:15: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 12:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:15; Gal 5:6; Rom 4:5; 1 Cor 4:7; Rom 11:20; Gal 5:13; Rom 12:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.52 (CSEL 44:198–199; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-52).

## Letter 140.53

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-53
- Source: CSEL 44:199–200
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love casts out servile fear of punishment but keeps the chaste fear of losing God, like a loving wife who fears her husband's absence rather than his anger.

### Latin text

Timor ergo non est in caritate, quia perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem sed illum seruilem, illum, quo, cum se quisque ab opere malo abstinet, poena terretur, non iustitia delectatur; hunc foras caritas mittit, quam non delectat iniquitas, etiamsi proponatur impunitas, non illum, quo timet anima, ne amittat ipsam gratiam, qua in illa factum est, ut eam non peccare delectet, quo timet, ne deus eam deserat, etiamsi nullis dolorum cruciatibus puniat. hic timor castus est; non eum eicit caritas, sed adsciscit. de illo quippe scriptum est: Timor domini castus, permanens in saeculum saeculi. nequaquam istum diceret permanentem nisi sciens alium, qui non permaneret; et bene istum castum dixit, hoc enim non caret amor, quo anima inhaeret deo, quae dicit in alio psalmo: Perdidisti omnem, qui fornicatur abs te: mihi autem adhaerere deo bonum est. nam et coniunx, quae adulterinum animum gerit, etiamsi timore uiri non perpetret adulterium, tamen, quod deest operi, inest uoluntati; casta uero aliter timet, nam et ipsa timet uirum sed caste. denique timet illa, ne uir infestus adueniat, ista, ne offensus abscedat; non amanti enim praesentia uiri molesta est, amanti autem absentia. timore itaque casto, permanenti in saeculum saeculi timeat deum omne semen Israhel; timeant, quem diligunt, non alta sapiendo sed humilibus consentiendo; cum timore et tremore suam ipsorum salutem operentur; deus est enim, qui operatur in eis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate.

### English translation (Claude)

"There is no fear in love," then, because "perfect love casts out fear"; but that servile fear, the fear by which, when one abstains from an evil work, one is terrified by punishment, not delighted by righteousness. This fear love casts out, love which is not delighted by wickedness even if impunity were offered; not that fear by which the soul fears to lose the very grace by which it came about in it that not sinning delights it, by which it fears that God may abandon it, even if he punished it with no tortures of pain. This fear is chaste; love does not cast it out but takes it in. For of it it is written: "The fear of the Lord is chaste, enduring for ever and ever." He would by no means call this one enduring unless he knew of another that would not endure; and he rightly called this one chaste, for love, by which the soul cleaves to God, is not without it; the soul that says in another psalm: "You have destroyed everyone who goes whoring away from you; but for me it is good to cleave to God." For a wife too who has an adulterous mind, even if from fear of her husband she does not commit adultery, yet what is lacking in the act is present in the will; but a chaste wife fears in another way; for she too fears her husband, but chastely. In short, the one fears that her husband may come upon her in anger, the other that he may go away offended; for to one who does not love, the husband's presence is irksome, but to one who loves, his absence. With chaste fear, then, enduring for ever and ever, "let all the seed of Israel fear" God; let them fear him whom they love, not minding high things but agreeing with the lowly; let them work out their own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in them both to will and to work according to his good will.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 73:27 (72:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 73:28 (72:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 4:18; Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX); Ps 73:27–28 (72:27–28 LXX; Old Latin "fornicatur", rendered "goes whoring"); Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX); Rom 12:16; Phil 2:12–13. The image of the adulterous and the chaste wife is Augustine's illustration of fear; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.53 (CSEL 44:199–200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-53).

## Letter 140.54

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-54
- Source: CSEL 44:200–201
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who reject God's righteousness, if they spurn correction, will go into the 'outer darkness'; God is light and love, and the darkness is hatred and pride, into which the devil fell.

### Latin text

Haec est iustitia dei; hoc est, quod deus donat homini, cum iustificat impium; hanc dei iustitiam ignorantes superbi Iudaei et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti; hac superbia deiciuntur, ut humilis inseratur oleaster. et illi ibunt in tenebras exteriores, de quibus inter alia requisisti, uenientibus ab oriente et occidente multis, qui recumbant cum Abraham, Isaac et Iacob in regno caelorum. sunt enim modo in exteris tenebris, unde correctio desperanda non est; quam si contempserint, ibunt in tenebras exteriores, ubi correctionis locus non erit, quoniam deus lux est et tenebrae in eo non sunt ullae sed lux cordis, non istorum, qui in carne sunt, oculorum, nec omnino talis, qualis huius uisibilis lucis phantasia cogitatur; quamquam et ibi est uidere, sed longe aliter, longe dissimiliter. qualis enim lux est ipsa caritas, quis uerbis explicat? quis earum rerum, quae sensibus corporis adiacent, ullo demonstrat exemplo? an forte lux caritas non est? audi apostolum Iohannem; ipse quippe dixit, quod modo commemoraui: Quoniam deus lux est et tenebrae in eo non sunt ullae, qui rursus dicit: Deus caritas est. ac per hoc, si deus lux est et deus caritas est, profecto caritas lux ipsa est, quae diffunditur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. item dicit: Qui odit fratrem suum, in tenebris est usque adhuc. istae sunt tenebrae, in quas diabolus et angeli eius multum superbiendo progressi sunt. caritas enim non aemulatur, non inflatur; ideo non aemulatur, quia non inflatur; ubi enim praecedit inflatio, continuo sequitur aemulatio, quoniam superbia mater est inuidentiae.

### English translation (Claude)

This is the righteousness of God; this is what God gives to man when he justifies the ungodly. The proud Jews, ignorant of this righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, did not submit to the righteousness of God; by this pride they are cast down so that the humble wild olive may be grafted in. And they will go into the outer darkness, about which among other things you asked, while many come from east and west to recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. For they are now in exterior darkness, from which correction is not to be despaired of; but if they despise it, they will go into the outer darkness, where there will be no room for correction; since God is light, and in him there is no darkness at all; but the light of the heart, not of these eyes which are in the flesh, nor at all such as is imagined by the fancy of this visible light; although there too there is seeing, but far otherwise, far differently. For who can explain in words what kind of light love itself is? Who can show it by any example from the things that lie open to the bodily senses? Or perhaps love is not light? Listen to the apostle John; for he said what I just mentioned, "God is light, and in him there is no darkness at all," and again he says, "God is love." And so, if God is light and God is love, surely love is light itself, which is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. Likewise he says: "He who hates his brother is in darkness until now." This is the darkness into which the devil and his angels advanced by their great pride. For "love is not jealous, is not puffed up"; it is not jealous because it is not puffed up; for where puffing up goes before, jealousy at once follows, since pride is the mother of envy.

### Scripture references

- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:11: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:41: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 4:5; Rom 10:3; Rom 11:17–20; Matt 8:11–12; 1 John 1:5; 1 John 4:8, 16; Rom 5:5; 1 John 2:9; Matt 25:41; 1 Cor 13:4. Augustine distinguishes "exterior" darkness (now, curable) from "outer" darkness (final). The statements about the Jews are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.54 (CSEL 44:200–201; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-54).

## Letter 140.55

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-55
- Source: CSEL 44:201–202
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The devil and his angels, cold with pride and envy, are figured by the north wind; the Spirit of grace is the warm south wind that melts sins and makes love flow.

### Latin text

Diabolus igitur et angeli eius a luce atque feruore caritatis auersi et nimis in superbiam inuidiamque progressi uelut glaciali duritia torpuerunt. et ideo per figuram tamquam in aquilone ponuntur. unde, cum generi humano diabolus incubaret, uentura gratia saluatoris dicitur in cantico canticorum: Exsurge, aquilo, et ueni, auster, et perfla hortum meum et fluent aromata. exsurge, qui inruisti, qui subditis incumbis, qui possessos premis; exsurge, ut a tuo pondere releuati erigantur, quorum animas premendo curuasti; et ueni, auster, inquit spiritum inuocans gratiae flantem de meridie uelut a parte feruida et luminosa, ut fluant aromata. unde apostolus dicit: Christi bonus odor sumus in omni loco. hinc etiam dicitur in quodam psalmo: Conuerte, domine, captiuitatem nostram sicut torrens in austro, captiuitatem scilicet, qua sub diabolo tamquam sub aquilone tenebantur, ubi abundante iniquitate friguerant et quodam modo congelauerant. hinc enim et euangelium dicit: Quoniam abundabit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum. at uero flante austro glacies resoluitur et torrentes fluunt, id est peccatis remissis populi ad Christum caritate concurrunt. hinc et alibi scriptum est: Sicut glacies in sereno ita soluuntur peccata tua.

### English translation (Claude)

The devil and his angels, then, turned away from the light and warmth of love and advanced too far into pride and envy, grew numb as with icy hardness. And therefore they are placed figuratively as it were in the north. Hence, since the devil lay heavy on the human race, with the grace of the Savior about to come it is said in the Song of Songs: "Arise, north wind, and come, south wind, and blow through my garden, and the spices will flow." Arise, you who rushed in, who lie heavy on your subjects, who oppress those you possess; arise, so that those whose souls you bent by pressing on them may be relieved of your weight and stand upright. "And come, south wind," he says, calling on the Spirit of grace, blowing from the south as from the warm and bright quarter, so that the spices may flow. Hence the apostle says: "We are the good fragrance of Christ in every place." Hence also it is said in a certain psalm: "Turn back our captivity, Lord, like a torrent in the south wind": the captivity, namely, in which they were held under the devil as under the north wind, where, with iniquity abounding, they had grown cold and in a way frozen. For hence the Gospel too says: "Because iniquity will abound, the love of many will grow cold." But when the south wind blows the ice melts and the torrents flow, that is, when sins are forgiven the peoples run together to Christ in love. Hence it is written elsewhere too: "Like ice in fair weather, so your sins will melt away."

### Scripture references

- Song 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 2:15: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 126:4 (125:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:12: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 14:13: echo, low confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 3:15 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Song 4:16; 2 Cor 2:15; Ps 126:4 (125:4 LXX); Matt 24:12; Sir 3:15 (3:17 in some numberings; Old Latin). Isa 14:13 (the north) may lie behind the image (uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.55 (CSEL 44:201–202; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-55).

## Letter 140.56

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-56
- Source: CSEL 44:202–203
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The rational creature cannot be its own good; it becomes happy by turning to God and miserable by turning away, growing dark and hard without love.

### Latin text

Proinde rationalis creatura siue in angelico spiritu siue in anima humana ita facta est, ut sibi ipsa bonum, quo beata fiat, esse non possit, sed mutabilitas eius, si conuertatur ad incommutabile bonum, fiat beata; unde si auertatur, misera est. auersio eius uitium eius et conuersio uirtus eius est. natura ergo non est mala, quia creatura spiritus uitae rationalis etiam priuata bono, cuius participatione beatificatur, id est etiam uitiosa melior est corpore, quod summum est in corporibus, id est hac luce, quae sentitur oculis carnis, quia et ipsa corpus est, omni autem corpore quaelibet incorporea natura praestantior non mole, quia nonnisi corporum est moles, sed ui quadam, qua supergreditur omnem phantasiam, quam uolutat animus haustam de sensibus corporis. sed quem ad modum in ipsis corporibus ea, quae inferiora sunt, sicut terra et aqua et ipse aer, meliora fiunt participatione melioris, id est cum luce inluminantur et feruore uegetantur, sic incorporeae creaturae rationales ipsius creatoris fiunt participatione meliores, cum ei cohaerent purissima et sanctissima caritate; quam omni modo si caruerint, tenebrescent et obdurescent quodam modo.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, the rational creature, whether in an angelic spirit or in a human soul, was so made that it cannot itself be the good by which it becomes happy; but its changeableness, if it is turned to the unchangeable good, becomes happy; hence if it turns away, it is miserable. Its turning away is its vice, and its turning toward is its virtue. Its nature, then, is not evil, because a created spirit of rational life, even when deprived of the good by participation in which it is made happy, that is, even when vicious, is better than the body that is highest among bodies, that is, this light which is perceived by the eyes of the flesh, since it too is a body; and any incorporeal nature whatever is superior to every body, not in bulk, since bulk belongs only to bodies, but by a certain power by which it surpasses every image that the mind turns over, drawn from the bodily senses. But just as, among bodies themselves, the lower ones, such as earth and water and air itself, become better by participation in a better one, that is, when they are lit by light and quickened by warmth, so incorporeal rational creatures become better by participation in the creator himself, when they cleave to him with most pure and most holy love; and if they lack this altogether, they grow dark and in a way hardened.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.56 (CSEL 44:202–203; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-56).

## Letter 140.57

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-57
- Source: CSEL 44:203–204
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Unbelievers are darkness, believers become light; the outer darkness is the penal company of the devil and his angels, opposite to the inner joy of the Lord, understood not spatially but in terms of the will.

### Latin text

Proinde infideles homines tenebrae sunt, qui per fidem conuersi ad deum quadam praemissa inluminatione lux fiunt. in qua proficiendo si ex fide ad speciem peruenerint, ut id, quod credunt, etiam conspicere, sicut tantum bonum potest conspici, mereantur, perfectam recipient imaginem dei; talibus enim dicit apostolus: Fuistis aliquando tenebrae, nunc autem lux in domino. porro diabolus et angeli eius tenebrae sunt infidelibus hominibus exteriores; plus enim ab illa caritate auersi et in suum fastum obstinationemque progressi sunt. et quoniam extremo iudicio dicturus est Christus eis, quos ad sinistram discernet: Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis eius, his malignis spiritibus coniungendos simulque damnandos dicet ituros in tenebras exteriores, id est in societatem poenalem diaboli et angelorum eius. huic poenae contrarium est, quod bono seruo dicitur: Intra in gaudium domini tui, ut, quanto sunt istae tenebrae exteriores, tanto sit lumen illud interius. non haec per locorum interualla inani phantasmate cogitanda sunt; localia spatia non occupant nisi corporum moles. non est hoc spiritus uitae, non est hoc anima rationalis, multo minus deus omnium benignissimus conditor et iustissimus ordinator. uoluntatibus et affectibus ista uel propinquare uel longe fieri uel intrare uel exire dicuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, unbelieving people are darkness; those who are converted to God through faith become light by a kind of preliminary illumination. If, advancing in this, they come from faith to sight, so as to be worthy also to behold what they believe, as far as so great a good can be beheld, they will receive the perfect image of God; for to such the apostle says: "You were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord." Further, the devil and his angels are darkness exterior to unbelieving people; for they have turned further away from that love and advanced into their own arrogance and obstinacy. And since at the last judgment Christ will say to those whom he separates to his left, "Go into the eternal fire, which has been prepared for the devil and his angels," he will say that those who are to be joined to these malignant spirits and condemned together with them will go into the outer darkness, that is, into the penal company of the devil and his angels. The opposite of this punishment is what is said to the good servant, "Enter into the joy of your lord"; so that as much as that darkness is outer, so much is that light inner. These things are not to be thought of with an empty image of distances of place; only the bulk of bodies occupies spaces of place. Such is not the spirit of life, such is not the rational soul, much less God, the most kind founder and most just ordainer of all. These are said to draw near or to become far, to enter or to go out, by wills and affections.

### Scripture references

- Eph 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: echo, medium confidence
- Matt 25:41: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 5:8; Matt 25:41; Matt 25:21; Matt 25:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.57 (CSEL 44:203–204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-57).

## Letter 140.58

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-58
- Source: CSEL 44:204
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The outer darkness brings 'weeping and gnashing of teeth'; it may also mean bodily punishment, which alone servile fear dreads, whereas chaste fear clings to God.

### Latin text

Sed quia malo opere, id est tenebroso delectantur facientes, secutura est autem poena, quae torqueat, ideo dominus ubi dicit tenebras exteriores, addit etiam ibi erit ploratus et stridor dentium, ne talibus oblectationibus, qualibus hic iniqui perfruuntur, quando infidelitate atque iniustitia tenebrescunt, etiam in illo supplicio se usuros dementer existiment: quia enim uolentes iniuste utuntur bonis, iuste nolentes cruciabuntur malis. unde possunt etiam tenebrae exteriores intellegi poenae corporales — corpus quippe est animae exterius —, ut sint animae mala, quibus a caritatis lumine auersa in peccatis oblectatur, exterae tenebrae, corporis autem mala, quibus aeternis in finem torquebitur, exteriores tenebrae. quas solas timent, qui seruili adhuc timore detinentur. nam si eis liceret in illis exteris, quae sunt in peccatis, impune semper uolui et inuolui, profecto numquam uellent accedere ad deum et inluminari et inhaerere illi per caritatem, ubi est timor castus, permanens in saeculum saeculi, qui timor non cruciat, sed tenaciorem facit animam boni illius, quod si dimiserit, cadit.

### English translation (Claude)

But because those who do evil, that is, dark works, take delight in them, and a punishment will follow that torments, therefore the Lord, where he speaks of the outer darkness, adds also, "there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth," lest they foolishly suppose that they will enjoy even in that punishment such delights as the wicked enjoy here when they grow dark through unbelief and injustice. For because they willingly use goods unjustly, they will justly be tormented unwillingly by evils. Hence the outer darkness can also be understood as bodily punishments (for the body is exterior to the soul): so that the evils of the soul, in which, turned away from the light of love, it delights in sins, would be the exterior darkness, and the evils of the body, by which it will be tormented eternally without end, the outer darkness. Only this is feared by those who are still held by servile fear. For if they were allowed always to roll and wrap themselves with impunity in that exterior darkness which is in sins, they would surely never wish to approach God and be enlightened and cling to him through love, where there is the chaste fear that endures for ever and ever, a fear which does not torment but makes the soul cling more tenaciously to that good, from which, if it lets go, it falls.

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:30: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:19: echo, medium confidence
- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 8:12; 22:13; 25:30; Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX). Augustine distinguishes "exterae" (exterior) and "exteriores" (outer) darkness; the distinction is kept in the translation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.58 (CSEL 44:204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-58).

## Letter 140.59

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-59
- Source: CSEL 44:204–205
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God did not despise the prayer of the poor and humble one; though he 'forsook' Christ in temporal things, he heard him and did not depart from him.

### Latin text

Timeat eum omne semen Israhel. et uide causam, quam coniungit: Quoniam non spreuit, inquit, neque despexit precem pauperis. pauperem humilem dicit; hinc est: Noli altum sapere, sed time. timeat ergo eum omne semen Israhel, quoniam non despexit eius precem, qui non altum sapuit, sed timuit. potest hoc et capiti coaptari, quia ipse saluator corporis propter nos pauper factus est, cum diues esset, ut eius paupertate ditaremur. ex forma enim serui pauper factus est, ex qua et precem fudit; in ea quippe humiliauit semet ipsum factus oboediens usque ad mortem. uide ergo, quid dicat: Quoniam non spreuit neque despexit precem pauperis neque auertit faciem suam a me. ubi est illud: Quare me dereliquisti, si nec faciem auertit ab eo, nisi quia et derelinquens non derelinquit, quando in bonis temporalibus non exaudit non ad insipientiam nobis, sed ut sapiamus, quid auferat et quid offerat nobis? non, inquit, spreuit neque despexit precem pauperis neque auertit faciem suam a me et, cum clamarem ad eum, exaudiuit me. fecit ergo, quod paulo ante rogatus est, ubi ei deprecans dixit: Ne discedas a me. si enim exaudiuit, profecto fecit, non itaque discessit. non ergo dereliquit hoc modo, qui alio modo dereliquit, ut saperemus, quo modo magis non ab eo derelinqui uelle debemus.

### English translation (Claude)

"Let all the seed of Israel fear him." And see the reason he joins to it: "For he has not scorned," he says, "nor despised the prayer of the poor man." By the poor man he means the humble; hence "Do not be high-minded, but fear." Let all the seed of Israel fear him, then, because he has not despised the prayer of one who was not high-minded but feared. This can be fitted to the head too, because the Savior of the body himself became poor for our sake, though he was rich, so that by his poverty we might become rich. For he became poor in the form of a servant, in which also he poured out his prayer; for in it he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death. See, then, what he says: "For he has not scorned nor despised the prayer of the poor man, nor turned his face away from me." Where is "Why have you forsaken me?", if he did not even turn his face away from him, unless it is that even when forsaking he does not forsake, when he does not hear us in temporal goods, not for folly to us, but so that we may become wise as to what he takes away and what he offers us? "He has not scorned," he says, "nor despised the prayer of the poor man, nor turned his face away from me; and when I cried to him, he heard me." He did, then, what he was asked a little before, when he said to him in prayer, "Do not depart from me." For if he heard him, he surely did it; so he did not depart. He did not forsake him, then, in this way, he who forsook him in another way, so that we might become wise as to how we ought rather to wish not to be forsaken by him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:23 (21:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:24 (21:25 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:20: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 8:9: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:11 (21:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:23–24 (21:24–25 LXX); Rom 11:20; 2 Cor 8:9; Phil 2:7–8; Ps 22:1, 11 (21:2, 12 LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.59 (CSEL 44:204–205; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-59).

## Letter 140.60

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-60
- Source: CSEL 44:205–206
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's praise is in the great church spread through all nations; confession is also praise, and the poor who eat and are satisfied are the humble 'little ones'.

### Latin text

Apud te laus mea. quid ergo nocent, qui tamquam uicto insultant, quod me in temporalibus dereliqueris? in ecclesia magna confitebor tibi, non quanta ista synagoga est, quae inridet mortem derelicti, sed in ecclesia magna diffusa per omnes gentes, quae credit in resurrectionem non derelicti. haec est unica illa, quam petit de manu canis erui, de qua etiam paulo ante dixit: In medio ecclesiae cantabo te, et nunc quod ait: Confitebor tibi, in eis utique, qui confitebuntur, in quibus et loquitur. confessio autem non tantum peccatorum est sed et laudis dei, sicut ipse in euangelio: Confiteor tibi, inquit, pater, domine caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus et reuelasti ea paruulis. ideo sequitur et dicit: Vota mea reddam coram timentibus eum. edent pauperes et saturabuntur et laudabunt dominum, qui requirunt eum. ipsi sunt paruuli, de quibus dixit: Et reuelasti ea paruulis, timentes eum et pauperes, id est humiles, qui non alta sapiunt, sed timent timore illo casto, non quo poena formidatur, sed quo gratia conseruatur.

### English translation (Claude)

"With you is my praise." What harm, then, do they do who taunt me as one conquered, because you forsook me in temporal things? "In the great church I will confess to you": not one as great as this synagogue, which mocks the death of one forsaken, but in the great church spread through all nations, which believes in the resurrection of one not forsaken. This is that only one which he asks to be delivered from the hand of the dog, of which he also said a little earlier, "In the midst of the church I will sing to you"; and now, when he says, "I will confess to you," it is certainly in those who will confess, in whom he also speaks. Confession, however, is not only of sins but also of the praise of God, as he himself says in the Gospel: "I confess to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones." Therefore he goes on to say: "I will pay my vows before those who fear him. The poor will eat and be satisfied, and they will praise the Lord who seek him." These are the little ones of whom he said, "And you have revealed them to little ones": those who fear him and are poor, that is, humble, who are not high-minded, but fear with that chaste fear, not the fear by which punishment is dreaded, but by which grace is preserved.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:25 (21:26 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:22 (21:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:25–26 (21:26–27 LXX, Old Latin "in ecclesia magna confitebor tibi"); Ps 22:20, 22 (21:21, 23 LXX); Matt 11:25. The contrast with "this synagogue" is Augustine's; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.60 (CSEL 44:205–206; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-60).

## Letter 140.61

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-61
- Source: CSEL 44:206–207
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's 'vows' are the sacrifice of his body, the Eucharist; the poor who eat it and imitate his humility are satisfied, and their hearts live for ever, whereas pride is the beginning of sin.

### Latin text

Vota uero sua sacrificium uult intellegi corporis sui, quod est fidelium sacramentum. ideo cum dixisset: Vota mea reddam coram timentibus eum, continuo subiunxit: Edent pauperes et saturabuntur. ipsi enim saturabuntur pane, qui de caelo descendit, qui ei cohaerentes et eius pacem dilectionemque seruantes imitantur eius humilitatem; ideo pauperes. in hac paupertate et saturitate praecipue apostoli claruerunt. et laudabunt, inquit, dominum, qui requirunt eum intellegentes non meritorum suorum sed illius esse gratiae. quod saturati sunt. requirunt enim eum, quia non sunt ex eis, qui sua quaerunt, non quae Iesu Christi. denique, etsi caro eorum, qui eum laudant, patitur temporalem tribulationem uel mortem, uiuent corda eorum in saeculum saeculi. haec uita cordis non est in sensibus corporis; secreta est in luce, quae intus est, non in tenebris, quae foris sunt, in fine praecepti, non in initio peccati. finis autem praecepti est caritas de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta, caritas, quae non aemulatur, non inflatur, quia non altum sapit, sed timet: et ideo cohaeret timore casto, permanente in saeculum saeculi. initium autem omnis peccati superbia, qua diabolus inreuocabiliter in exteriora progressus est hominemque inuidendo et ei simile aliquid suadendo deiecit. cui homini in quadam scriptura dicitur: Quid superbit terra et cinis, quoniam in uita sua proiecit intima sua? in uita sua dictum est tamquam in propria sua et quasi priuata, qua delectatur omnis superbia.

### English translation (Claude)

By his vows he wants us to understand the sacrifice of his body, which is the sacrament of the faithful. Therefore, when he had said, "I will pay my vows before those who fear him," he at once added: "The poor will eat and be satisfied." For they will be satisfied with the bread which came down from heaven who, cleaving to him and keeping his peace and love, imitate his humility; therefore they are poor. In this poverty and satisfaction the apostles above all shone. "And they will praise," he says, "the Lord, who seek him," understanding that it is not by their own merits but by his grace that they have been satisfied. For they seek him, because they are not among those who seek their own things, not those of Jesus Christ. Finally, even if the flesh of those who praise him suffers temporal tribulation or death, "their hearts will live for ever and ever." This life of the heart is not in the bodily senses; it is hidden in the light that is within, not in the darkness that is outside, in the end of the commandment, not in the beginning of sin. Now "the end of the commandment is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned": the love that "is not jealous, is not puffed up," because it is not high-minded but fears, and so it cleaves with the chaste fear that endures for ever and ever. But "the beginning of all sin is pride," by which the devil advanced irrevocably into the exterior darkness, and by envying man and persuading him to something like himself, cast him down. To this man it is said in a certain Scripture: "Why is earth and ash proud, since in its life it has cast away its inmost parts?" "In its life" is said as if in its own and, as it were, private life, in which all pride delights.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:25 (21:26 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 6:51: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Gen 3:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 10:13 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Sir 10:9 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:25–26 (21:26–27 LXX); John 6:41, 51; Phil 2:21; 1 Tim 1:5; 1 Cor 13:4; Sir 10:13 (10:15 in some numberings) and Sir 10:9–10 (Old Latin). "The sacrament of the faithful" is the Eucharist.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.61 (CSEL 44:206–207; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-61).

## Letter 140.62

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-62
- Source: CSEL 44:207–209
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love lives by the heavenly bread; its breadth is good works, its length patient endurance, its height the hope of eternal life, and its depth the hidden grace of God's will, as in Ephesians 3.

### Latin text

Unde caritas in commune magis quam in priuatum consulens dicitur non quaerere quae sua sunt. hac uiuunt corda in saeculum saeculi tamquam saturata pane caelesti, de qua dicit ipse saturator: Nisi manducaueritis carnem meam et sanguinem biberitis, non habebitis uitam in uobis. merito ergo istorum, qui saturantur, uiuent corda in saeculum saeculi. uita enim Christus est, qui habitat in cordibus eorum interim per fidem post etiam per speciem. uident enim nunc per speculum in aenigmate tunc autem facie ad faciem. unde ipsa caritas nunc in bonis operibus dilectionis exercetur, qua se ad subueniendum, quaqua uersum potest, porrigit, et haec latitudo est; nunc longanimitate aduersa tolerat et in eo, quod ueraciter tenuit, perseuerat, et haec longitudo est; hoc autem totum propter adipiscendam uitam facit aeternam, quae illi promittitur in excelso, et haec altitudo est. existit uero ex occulto ista caritas, ubi fundati quodam modo et radicati sumus, ubi causae uoluntatis dei non uestigantur, cuius gratia sumus salui facti non ex operibus iustitiae, quae nos fecimus, sed secundum eius misericordiam. uoluntarie quippe genuit nos uerbo ueritatis. et haec uoluntas eius in abdito est. cuius secreti profunditatem quodam modo expauescens apostolus clamat: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! quis enim cognouit sensum domini? et hoc est profundum. altitudo quippe commune nomen est excelso et profundo, sed, cum in excelso dicitur, sublimitatis eminentia commendatur, cum autem in profundo, difficultas inuestigationis et cognitionis. unde et illud deo dicitur: Quam magnificata sunt opera tua, domine! nimis profundae factae sunt cogitationes tuae. et iterum: Iudicia tua uelut multa abyssus. hinc igitur est illud apostoli, quod requirendum inter cetera posuisti: Huius rei gratia, inquit, flecto genua mea ad patrem domini nostri Iesu Christi, ex quo omnis paternitas in caelis et in terra nominatur, ut det uobis secundum diuitias gloriae suae uirtute corroborari per spiritum eius, in interiore homine habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus uestris, ut in caritate radicati et fundati praeualeatis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, scire etiam supereminentem scientiam caritatis Christi, ut impleamini in omnem plenitudinem dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence love, caring for the common good rather than the private, is said "not to seek its own." By this love hearts live for ever and ever, as if satisfied with the heavenly bread, of which the one who satisfies says himself: "Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you will not have life in you." Rightly, then, the hearts of those who are satisfied will live for ever and ever. For the life is Christ, who dwells in their hearts, for now by faith, afterward also by sight. For they see now "through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face." Hence love itself is now exercised in good works of charity, by which it stretches itself out to help wherever it can; and this is the breadth. Now with long-suffering it bears adversity and perseveres in what it has truly held; and this is the length. But it does all this for the sake of attaining eternal life, which is promised to it on high; and this is the height. This love arises from a hidden source, where we are in a way grounded and rooted, where the causes of the will of God are not traced out, by whose grace we have been saved, "not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy." For "of his own will he begot us by the word of truth"; and this will of his is in what is hidden. Trembling as it were at the depth of this secret, the apostle cries: "O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and untraceable his ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord?" And this is the depth. For "altitudo" is a word common to the high and the deep; but when it is said of the high, the eminence of loftiness is commended; when of the deep, the difficulty of searching and knowing. Hence it is said to God: "How great are your works, O Lord! Your thoughts are made exceedingly deep." And again: "Your judgments are like a great abyss." Hence, then, comes that saying of the apostle which you put among the things to be asked about: "For this reason," he says, "I bend my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom every fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named, that he may grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with power through his Spirit, that Christ may dwell in the inner man through faith in your hearts, so that, rooted and grounded in love, you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, to know also the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God."

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:53: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:34: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 92:5 (91:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:6 (35:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:14: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 13:5; John 6:53; Eph 3:17; 1 Cor 13:12; Titus 3:5; Jas 1:18; Rom 11:33–34; Ps 92:5 (91:6 LXX); Ps 36:6 (35:7 LXX); Eph 3:14–19 (Old Latin, "every fatherhood"). "Altitudo" in Latin can mean both height and depth; Augustine plays on this. This section answers Honoratus's question on Eph 3:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.62 (CSEL 44:207–209; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-62).

## Letter 140.63

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-63
- Source: CSEL 44:209–211
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine expounds Ephesians 3:13–19: rooted and grounded in love by God's free grace, believers grasp its breadth, length, height, and depth, until in the age to come love contemplates and praises God for ever.

### Latin text

Adtende omnia diligenter. huius rei gratia, inquit, flecto genua mea ad patrem domini nostri Iesu Christi, ex quo omnis paternitas in caelo et in terra nominatur. quaeris, cuius rei gratia. hoc supra dixerat: Propter quod peto non infirmari in tribulationibus meis pro uobis. hoc ergo eis optat, ut non infirmentur in tribulationibus apostoli, quas pro illis sustinebat, et propter hoc genua flectebat ad patrem. proinde non infirmari unde illis sit, sequitur et dicit: Ut det uobis secundum diuitias gloriae suae uirtute corroborari per spiritum eius. hae sunt diuitiae, de quibus dicit: o altitudo diuitiarum! abditas enim habent causas, ubi nullis meritis praecedentibus quid habemus, quod non accepimus? deinde sequitur et, quid optet, adiungit: In interiore, inquit, homine habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus uestris. haec est uita cordium, qua uiuimus in saeculum saeculi ab initio fidei usque ad finem speciei. ut in caritate, inquit, radicati et fundati praeualeatis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis. ista est communio cuiusdam diuinae caelestisque rei publicae; hinc saturantur pauperes non sua quaerentes, sed quae Iesu Christi, id est non commoda priuata sectantes sed in commune, ubi salus omnium est, consulentes; nam de ipso pane, quo tales saturantur, quodam loco apostolus dicit: Unus panis, unum corpus multi sumus. quid ergo comprehendere? quae sit, inquit, latitudo, sicut iam dixi, in bonis operibus, quibus beniuolentia porrigitur usque ad diligendos inimicos. et longitudo, ut longanimitate pro hac latitudine molestiae tolerentur, et altitudo, ut pro his aeternum quod in supernis est praemium, non uanum aliquid temporale speretur. et profundum, unde gratuita gratia dei secundum secretum et abditum uoluntatis eius existit. ibi enim radicati, ibi fundati sumus, radicati propter agriculturam, fundati propter aedificationem; quae quoniam non est ab homine, dicit alio loco idem apostolus: Dei agricultura, dei aedificatio estis. hoc totum agitur, cum in hac nostra peregrinatione fides per dilectionem operatur. in futuro autem saeculo perfecta et plena caritas sine ulla malorum tolerantia non fide credit, quod non uidet, nec spe desiderat, quod non tenet, sed in aeternum ueritatis incommutabilem speciem contemplabitur, cuius sine fine quietum opus erit laudare quod amat, et amare, quod laudat. de hac consequenter dicit: Scire etiam supereminentem scientiam caritatis Christi, ut impleamini in omnem plenitudinem dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Attend to everything carefully. "For this reason," he says, "I bend my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom every fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named." You ask, for what reason. He had said this above: "Therefore I ask that you not lose heart in my tribulations for you." This, then, is what he wishes for them, that they may not lose heart in the apostle's tribulations, which he endured for them; and for this he bent his knees to the Father. Next, where they might get the power not to lose heart, he goes on to say: "that he may grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with power through his Spirit." These are the riches of which he says, "O the depth of the riches!" For they have hidden causes, where, with no merits going before, what do we have that we have not received? Then he goes on and adds what he wishes: "that Christ," he says, "may dwell in the inner man through faith in your hearts." This is the life of hearts, by which we live for ever and ever, from the beginning of faith to the end, which is sight. "So that, rooted and grounded in love," he says, "you may be able to comprehend with all the saints." This is the communion of a certain divine and heavenly commonwealth; from here the poor are satisfied, not seeking their own things but those of Jesus Christ, that is, not pursuing private advantages but caring for the common good, where the salvation of all is; for of that very bread with which such people are satisfied the apostle says in a certain place: "One bread, one body, we who are many." What then are they to comprehend? "What is the breadth," he says, as I have already said, in good works, by which goodwill reaches out even to loving enemies; "and length," so that troubles may be borne with long-suffering for the sake of this breadth; "and height," so that for these things an eternal reward in the heavens may be hoped for, not anything vain and temporal; "and depth," from which the free grace of God arises according to the secret and hidden purpose of his will. For there we are rooted, there grounded: rooted with regard to husbandry, grounded with regard to building; and since this is not from man, the same apostle says in another place: "You are God's husbandry, God's building." All this takes place while in this pilgrimage of ours faith works through love. But in the age to come, perfect and full love, without any enduring of evils, will not believe by faith what it does not see, nor desire by hope what it does not hold, but will contemplate for ever the unchangeable sight of the truth, whose restful work without end will be to praise what it loves and to love what it praises. Of this he goes on to say: "to know also the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God."

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:14: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 3:13–19; Rom 11:33; 1 Cor 4:7; Phil 2:21; 1 Cor 10:17; Matt 5:44; 1 Cor 3:9; Gal 5:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.63 (CSEL 44:209–211; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-63).

## Letter 140.64

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-64
- Source: CSEL 44:211–212
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The cross figures the four dimensions: the crossbeam is good works, the upright long-suffering, the top hope of heaven, and the hidden foot the depth of free grace.

### Latin text

In hoc mysterio figura crucis ostenditur. qui enim, quia uoluit, mortuus est, quo modo uoluit, mortuus est. non frustra igitur tale genus mortis elegit, nisi in eo quoque latitudinis huius et longitudinis et altitudinis et profunditatis magister existeret. nam latitudo est in eo ligno, quod transuersum desuper figitur; hoc ad bona opera pertinet, quia ibi extenduntur manus. longitudo in eo, quod ab ipso ligno usque ad terram conspicuum est; ibi enim quodam modo statur, id est persistitur et perseueratur, quod longanimitati tribuitur. altitudo est in ea ligni parte, quae ab illo, quod transuersum figitur, sursum uersus relinquitur, hoc est ad caput crucifixi, quia bene sperantium superna expectatio est. iam uero illud ex ligno, quod non apparet, quod fixum occultatur, unde totum illud exsurgit, profunditatem significat gratuitae gratiae; in quo multorum ingenia conteruntur id uestigare conantia, ut ad extremum eis dicatur: o homo tu quis es, qui respondeas deo?

### English translation (Claude)

In this mystery the figure of the cross is shown. For he who died because he willed it died in the way he willed. Not in vain, then, did he choose such a kind of death, unless that in it too he might stand out as the teacher of this breadth and length and height and depth. For the breadth is in that beam which is fixed crosswise at the top; this belongs to good works, because the hands are stretched out there. The length is in the part visible from that beam down to the ground; for there one in a way stands, that is, persists and perseveres, which is ascribed to long-suffering. The height is in that part of the wood which is left upward from the crossbeam, that is, at the head of the crucified, because the expectation of those who hope well is of things above. And that part of the wood which does not appear, which is fixed and hidden, from which the whole rises up, signifies the depth of free grace, in which the minds of many are worn out trying to trace it, so that at last it is said to them: "O man, who are you to answer back to God?"

### Scripture references

- John 10:18: echo, medium confidence
- Eph 3:18: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 10:18 (echo); Rom 9:20. The symbolism of the cross's dimensions is Augustine's interpretation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.64 (CSEL 44:211–212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-64).

## Letter 140.65

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-65
- Source: CSEL 44:212
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The satisfied poor are the humble filled with love, first the apostles, whose preaching of grace won the nations.

### Latin text

Viuent ergo corda saturatorum pauperum in saeculum saeculi, hoc est humilium caritate flagrantium, non sua quaerentium sed sanctorum societate gaudentium. hoc primitus in apostolis factum est. sed laudando deum, id est praedicando gratiam dei, quoniam dictum est: Laudabunt dominum, qui requirunt eum. quid populorum adquisierint, in eo, quod sequitur, uide.

### English translation (Claude)

The hearts of the poor who are satisfied will live, then, for ever and ever: that is, of the humble, burning with love, not seeking their own things but rejoicing in the fellowship of the saints. This was done first in the apostles. But by praising God, that is, by preaching the grace of God, since it is said, "They will praise the Lord who seek him," see in what follows what peoples they gained.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX); Phil 2:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.65 (CSEL 44:212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-65).

## Letter 140.66

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-66
- Source: CSEL 44:212–214
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The nations will turn to the Lord; the 'rich of the earth', the proud, also come to Christ's table and receive his body and blood, but are not satisfied because they do not imitate his humility.

### Latin text

Commemorabuntur, inquit, et conuertentur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium, quoniam domini est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium. ille inrisus, ille crucifixus, ille derelictus hoc regnum adquirit et tradet in fine deo et patri, non ut ipse amittat, sed, quod in fide seminauit, cum uenit minor patre, hoc perducat ad speciem, in qua aequalis non recessit a patre. manducauerunt et adorauerunt omnes diuites terrae; diuites terrae superbos intellegere debemus, si recte superius pauperes humiles intellegebamus, de quibus in euangelio dicit: Beati pauperes spiritu, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum; ipsi enim sunt mites, lugentes, esurientes et sitientes iustitiam, miseri cordes, mundo corde, pacifici et qui persecutionem patiuntur propter iustitiam, quibus praedicationibus singillatim beatitudinem adiunxit. contra ergo diuites terrae hoc loco superbi intellegendi sunt. neque enim frustra ita distincti sunt, ut de pauperibus supra diceretur: Edent pauperes et saturabuntur, hic uero: Manducauerunt et adorauerunt omnes diuites terrae. et ipsi quippe adducti sunt ad mensam Christi et accipiunt de corpore et sanguine eius, sed adorant tantum, non etiam saturantur, quoniam non imitantur. manducantes enim pauperem dedignantur esse pauperes, quia Christus pro nobis passus est relinquens nobis exemplum, ut sequamur uestigia eius. uerum tamen, quod humiliauit semet ipsum factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis, aspernantur diuites et similia perpeti respuunt tumore non magnitudine, infirmitate ergo non sanitate. sed quia deus eum excitauit a mortuis et donauit ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu flectatur omne genu caelestium, terrestrium et infernorum, fama celsitudinis eius et gloria nominis eius in ecclesia usquequaque diffusa permoti et ipsi ueniunt ad mensam, manducant et adorant, non tamen saturantur, quia non esuriunt et sitiunt iustitiam; tales enim saturabuntur. quamquam perfecta saturitas in illa uita aeterna erit, cum ex ista peregrinatione uenerimus ex fide ad speciem, ab speculo ad faciem, ab aenigmate ad perspicuam ueritatem. non tamen inconuenienter saturatus dicitur paupertate Christi, qui pro iustitia eius, hoc est pro participatione uerbi aeterni, quam inchoauit interim fide, omnia temporalia non solum temperanter contemnit bona, uerum etiam patienter sustinet mala.

### English translation (Claude)

"All the ends of the earth," he says, "will remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will worship in his sight, for the kingdom is the Lord's, and he will rule over the nations." He who was mocked, crucified, forsaken, gains this kingdom, and will hand it over at the end to God the Father, not so as to lose it himself, but so that what he sowed in faith when he came less than the Father he may bring to sight, in which, being equal, he did not withdraw from the Father. "All the rich of the earth have eaten and worshiped." By the rich of the earth we must understand the proud, if above we rightly understood the poor as the humble, of whom he says in the Gospel: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"; for they are the meek, those who mourn, those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, and those who suffer persecution for righteousness' sake, to each of which proclamations he joined a beatitude. By contrast, then, the rich of the earth in this place are to be understood as the proud. For not in vain are they distinguished in this way, so that of the poor it was said above, "The poor will eat and be satisfied," but here, "All the rich of the earth have eaten and worshiped." For they too have been brought to the table of Christ and receive of his body and blood, but they only worship, they are not also satisfied, because they do not imitate him. For eating the poor one, they disdain to be poor, though Christ suffered for us, leaving us an example, that we should follow in his steps. But that he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross, the rich scorn, and they refuse to suffer similar things, out of swelling, not greatness, out of sickness, then, not health. But because God raised him from the dead and gave him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, of those in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, they too, moved by the fame of his exaltation and the glory of his name spread everywhere in the church, come to the table, eat and worship; yet they are not satisfied, because they do not hunger and thirst for righteousness; for such people will be satisfied. Although perfect satisfaction will be in that eternal life, when from this pilgrimage we come from faith to sight, from the mirror to the face, from the enigma to plain truth; yet it is not unfitting to say that one is satisfied by the poverty of Christ who, for his righteousness, that is, for participation in the eternal Word, which he has begun meanwhile by faith, not only temperately despises all temporal goods but also patiently endures evils.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:28 (21:29 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:29 (21:30 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:27–29 (21:28–30 LXX); 1 Cor 15:24; John 14:28; Matt 5:3–10; 1 Pet 2:21; Phil 2:8–10; 1 Cor 13:12; 2 Cor 5:7. The sacramental language (receiving his body and blood) is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.66 (CSEL 44:212–214; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-66).

## Letter 140.67

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-67
- Source: CSEL 44:214–215
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The apostles, poor fishermen and tax collectors, shared their satisfaction by preaching, and the world was converted; the proud lovers of earthly goods come but fall down in God's sight.

### Latin text

Tales fuerunt piscatores et publicani, quia abiecta huius mundi elegit, ut confunderet fortia. de his dictum est: Edent pauperes et saturabuntur. sed quia istam saturitatem non apud se ipsos tenuerunt, quodam modo enim ructantes dominum laudauerunt, hoc est praedicauerunt quaerentes eum, hoc est non sua quaerentes sed in eum caritate flagrantes. eorum praedicatione commotus est mundus, ut commemorentur et conuertantur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorent in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium, quoniam domini est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium. hac ecclesiae dilatatione etiam superbi, hoc est diuites terrae adducti sunt, ut manducarent, et quamuis non saturati tamen adorant. hunc quippe ordinem prophetia psalmi hoc loco tenuit, quem uidemus impleri. adiungit autem: In conspectu eius procident omnes, qui descendunt in terram, id est omnes bona amando terrena non in caelum ascendunt. non enim faciunt, quod ait apostolus: Si resurrexistis cum Christo, quae sursum sunt, quaerite, ubi Christus est in dextera dei sedens; quae sursum sunt, sapite, non quae super terram, sed potius, quanto sibi bonis terrenis feliciores uidentur, tanto magis in terram descendunt, hoc est in terrena deprimuntur. et ideo in conspectu eius procident, hoc est ubi ipse uidet, non ubi homines uident, qui eos excelsos sublimesque arbitrantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Such were the fishermen and tax collectors, because he chose the despised things of this world to confound the strong. Of these it was said, "The poor will eat and be satisfied." But because they did not keep this satisfaction to themselves, they praised the Lord, as it were belching it forth, that is, they preached, seeking him, that is, not seeking their own things but burning with love for him. By their preaching the world was moved, so that all the ends of the earth remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations worship in his sight, for the kingdom is the Lord's, and he will rule over the nations. By this spreading of the church even the proud, that is, the rich of the earth, were brought to eat, and though not satisfied, they nevertheless worship. For the prophecy of the psalm has kept this order here, which we see being fulfilled. And he adds: "In his sight all will fall down who go down into the earth," that is, all who, by loving earthly goods, do not go up into heaven. For they do not do what the apostle says: "If you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God; set your mind on things above, not on those on earth." But rather, the happier they seem to themselves in earthly goods, the more they go down into the earth, that is, are pressed down into earthly things. And therefore they will fall down in his sight, that is, where he sees, not where men see, who think them lofty and exalted.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:27: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:26 (21:27 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:27 (21:28 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:29 (21:30 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 1:27–28; Ps 22:26–29 (21:27–30 LXX); Col 3:1–2. "Ructantes" ("belching forth") echoes Ps 19:2 and 45:1 in the Old Latin ("eructauit").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.67 (CSEL 44:214–215; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-49/#p-140-67).

## Letter 140.68

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-68
- Source: CSEL 44:215–216
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'My soul lives for him': believers must live not for themselves in pride but for Christ, doing his will as he did the Father's, and so become the good seed that serves God.

### Latin text

Et anima, inquit, mea ipsi uiuit; ipsi utique, non sibi sicut superborum priuato suo bono laetantium et a communi omnium bono, quod deus est, inani elatione resilientium. hoc utique deuitemus et communi potius uero omnium bonorum perfrui quam priuato nostro gaudere quaeramus, ut, qui uiuit, iam non sibi uiuat, sicut ait apostolus, sed ei, qui pro ipsis mortuus est et resurrexit. per hoc enim mediator effectus est, ut nos reconciliet deo per humilitatem, a quo per impiam superbiam longe recesseramus. neque enim illud tantum scriptum est, quod supra posui: Initium omnis peccati superbia, sed etiam hoc ibi legitur: Initium superbiae homines apostatare a deo. non ergo sibi uiuat quisque sed Christo faciens non suam sed ipsius uoluntatem et manens in eius caritate, sicut et ipse fecit uoluntatem patris et manet in eius caritate. haec quippe nos admonens et exemplo suo exhortans in euangelio suo locutus est. si autem ipse, cum in forma dei aequalis est patri, tamen per formam serui, quam propter nos accepit, non suam uoluntatem sed patris se facere commendauit, quanto magis nos propria priuataque nostra uoluntate contempta, qua tenebrati sumus, ad illud commune lumen, ut inluminemur et uultus nostri non erubescant, debemus accedere, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, ut anima nostra ipsi uiuat! hoc enim etiam de nobis consequenter adiungit, cum dicit: Et semen meum seruiet illi, quoniam, qui seminat bonum semen, filius est hominis; bonum autem semen hi sunt filii regni.

### English translation (Claude)

"And my soul," he says, "lives for him": for him, certainly, not for itself, like the souls of the proud, who rejoice in their own private good and recoil with empty elation from the common good of all, which is God. Let us by all means avoid this, and seek rather to enjoy the common true good of all good people than to rejoice in our private good, so that he who lives may no longer live for himself, as the apostle says, but for him who died and rose for them. For by this he became mediator, to reconcile us through humility to God, from whom by ungodly pride we had departed far. For not only is what I set down above written, "The beginning of all sin is pride," but this also is read there: "The beginning of pride is for men to apostatize from God." Let no one, then, live for himself but for Christ, doing not his own will but Christ's, and remaining in his love, just as he too did the will of the Father and remains in his love. For he spoke these things in his Gospel, admonishing us and exhorting us by his example. But if he, though in the form of God he is equal to the Father, yet through the form of the servant which he took for our sake declared that he did not do his own will but the Father's, how much more ought we, despising our own private will, by which we were darkened, to approach that common light, so as to be enlightened and our faces not be ashamed, the light which enlightens every man coming into this world, so that our soul may live for him! For he goes on to add this about us too, when he says: "And my seed will serve him"; since "he who sows the good seed is the Son of Man; and the good seed are the sons of the kingdom."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:29 (21:30 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:30 (21:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:15: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:38: allusion, high confidence
- John 15:10: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:6: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 34:5 (33:6 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- John 1:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:37: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:38: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 10:13 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Sir 10:12 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:29–30 (21:30–31 LXX, Old Latin); 2 Cor 5:15; Sir 10:13, 10:12 (10:14–15 in some numberings; Old Latin); John 6:38; John 15:10; Phil 2:6–7; Ps 34:5 (33:6 LXX); John 1:9; Matt 13:37–38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.68 (CSEL 44:215–216; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-68).

## Letter 140.69

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-69
- Source: CSEL 44:216–217
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The psalm ends with prophecy: 'the generation to come will be announced to the Lord', not to inform God, but as angels present our prayers, which build us up and testify that God is our good.

### Latin text

Haec porro omnia, quae in psalmo isto dicta sunt, quia non ad praesens tempus sed ad futurorum prophetiam pertinebant, sicut etiam ipsis rebus apparet, sic eam concludere uoluit, ut ostenderet se non praesentia demonstrare uel narrare praeterita sed futura prophetare. adnuntiabitur, inquit, domino generatio uentura et adnuntiabunt iustitiam eius populo, qui nascetur, quem fecit dominus. non ait: Adnuntiabitur dominus generationi uenturae, sed: Adnuntiabitur domino generatio uentura. quod non sic accipiendum est, tamquam nescienti aliquid adnuntietur, ut sciat, sed sicut adnuntiant angeli non solum nobis beneficia dei uerum etiam illi preces nostras. nam scriptum est, ubi angelus hominibus dicit: Ego obtuli memoriam orationis uestrae, non ut tunc deus nouerit, quid uelimus uel quo indigeamus — nouit enim pater uester, ait dominus, quid uobis necessarium sit, priusquam petatis ab eo —, sed quia necesse habet rationalis creatura obtemperans deo temporales causas ad aeternam ueritatem referre siue petendo, quid erga se fiat, siue consulendo, quid faciat, qui pius mentis affectus est, ut ipsa construatur, non ut deus instruatur. nam et haec quaedam contestatio est rationalis creaturae, quod non sibi ipsa sit bonum, quo beata fiat, sed illud incommutabile, cuius participatione etiam sapiens efficitur.

### English translation (Claude)

All these things said in this psalm, then, since they referred not to the present time but to the prophecy of things to come, as the events themselves also show, he wished to conclude it in such a way as to show that he was not pointing out present things or narrating past ones but prophesying future ones. "The generation to come," he says, "will be announced to the Lord, and they will announce his righteousness to a people that will be born, whom the Lord has made." He does not say, "The Lord will be announced to the generation to come," but "The generation to come will be announced to the Lord." This is not to be taken as if something were announced to one who does not know, so that he may know; but as the angels announce not only God's benefits to us but also our prayers to him. For it is written, where an angel says to men, "I offered the remembrance of your prayer"; not that God then learns what we want or what we need ("for your Father knows," says the Lord, "what you need before you ask him"), but because the rational creature, obeying God, has need to refer temporal causes to the eternal truth, either by asking what may be done for it or by consulting what it should do; and this is a devout affection of the mind, so that the creature may be built up, not so that God may be instructed. For this too is a kind of testimony of the rational creature that it is not itself the good by which it becomes happy, but that unchangeable good by participation in which it is also made wise.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:30 (21:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:8: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 12:12 (Tobit): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:30–31 (21:31–32 LXX, Old Latin); Tobit 12:12 (Raphael's words, Old Latin); Matt 6:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.69 (CSEL 44:216–217; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-69).

## Letter 140.70

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-70
- Source: CSEL 44:217–218
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alternatively, the verse means that those who do good to God's praise belong to him; the creature becomes happy by turning from its own good to God, and so gives thanks, as in the Eucharist.

### Latin text

Siue ita dictum est: Adnuntiabitur domino generatio uentura, ac si diceretur domino placebunt qui adnuntiabunt non sibi, ut ita sit domino adnuntiare, sicut est domino uiuere. sic dictum est: Qui manducat, domino manducat et, qui non manducat, domino non manducat. ad hoc quippe addidit: Et gratias agit deo, ut ostenderetur, quid esset: Domino facit, id est in eius laudem facit. tunc enim recte, tunc iuste, tunc pie fit, cum opus bonum in eius fit laudem, cuius gratia donatur, ut fiat. ac per hoc, etiamsi eo modo quispiam uerba haec intellegere uelit, ut eorum iste ordo sit: Adnuntiabitur domino generatio uentura, id est ea generatio adnuntiabitur, quae domino uentura est, generatio scilicet piorum atque sanctorum, quia impiorum et sceleratorum generatio non domino sed sibi uentura est, ab eadem significatione non receditur, qua intellegatur animae participatio in id ipsum. id est rationalem creaturam, cum sit mutabilis, non fieri beatam, nisi a proprio suo mutabili ad incommutabile bonum idemque commune, quod deus est, a quo superba impietate abstitit, humili pietate conuersa subsistat. in quo affectu proficiens quicquid boni facit, domino facit, hoc est in eius laudem, cuius gratiam percepit, ut faciat; unde est actio gratiarum, quae intimo fidelium mysterio celebratur.

### English translation (Claude)

Or it was said thus, "The generation to come will be announced to the Lord," as if it were said: those who announce will please the Lord, not themselves; so that to announce to the Lord would be like living to the Lord. So it is said: "He who eats, eats to the Lord, and he who does not eat, abstains to the Lord." For to this he added, "and gives thanks to God," to show what "he does it to the Lord" means, that is, he does it to his praise. For then a thing is done rightly, justly, devoutly, when a good work is done to the praise of him by whose grace it is given that it be done. And so, even if someone wishes to understand these words in such a way that their order is this: "The generation to come will be announced to the Lord," that is, that generation will be announced which is to come to the Lord, namely the generation of the devout and the holy (since the generation of the ungodly and wicked will come not to the Lord but to itself), there is no departure from the same meaning, by which the soul's participation in the Selfsame is understood; that is, that the rational creature, since it is changeable, does not become happy unless, turned from its own changeable good with humble piety, it takes its stand in the unchangeable and common good, which is God, from whom it departed by proud ungodliness. Advancing in this affection, whatever good it does, it does to the Lord, that is, to the praise of him whose grace it received in order to do it; hence the thanksgiving which is celebrated in the inmost mystery of the faithful.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:30 (21:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:6: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 122:3 (121:3 LXX): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 14:6. "In id ipsum" (the Selfsame) echoes Ps 122:3 (121:3 LXX), Augustine's name for God's unchanging being. "The thanksgiving celebrated in the inmost mystery of the faithful" is the Eucharist.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.70 (CSEL 44:217–218; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-70).

## Letter 140.71

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-71
- Source: CSEL 44:218–219
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The 'righteousness of God' announced is the righteousness he gives to the saints by free grace, not their own; good works follow justification and do not precede it.

### Latin text

Illud autem, quod sequitur: Et adnuntiabunt iustitiam eius populo, qui nascetur, quem fecit dominus, superioris sensus confirmatio est. nam quod ibi dictum est: Adnuntiabitur domino generatio uentura, hoc dictum est hic: Adnuntiabunt iustitiam eius. ipsa quippe generatio, quae uentura prophetata est, piorum atque sanctorum iustitia dei est, non ipsorum, ne sint ex illis, qui ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. illa namque iustitia dei commendatur in eo, quod dicitur: Ignorantes dei iustitiam, qua nos ex eius gratia iusti sumus, ut ipsa iustitia eius nos simus, cum iuste uiuimus credentes in eum, qui iustificat impium non illa, qua ipse iustus est, aeterna sua et incommutabili iustitia. haec itaque iustitia, qua nos dei munere iusti sumus, significatur in psalmo illo, ubi scriptum est: Iustitia tua sicut montes dei. montes quippe dei sancti eius sunt, de quibus alibi dicitur: Suscipiant montes pacem populo tuo. et multa de his montibus scripta sunt figurata locutione, quae commemorare nunc longum est. sed quia hoc ipsum, quod deus iustificat homines, nimis occulto iudicio facit, quoniam gratuita gratia facit — si autem gratia, non ex operibus, alioquin gratia iam non est gratia; ex hoc quippe incipiunt opera bona, ex quo iustificamur, non, quia praecesserunt, iustificamur: et hoc est profundum, de quo superius multa iam diximus —, continuo in eodem psalmo cum dixisset: Iustitia tua uelut montes dei, subiunxit: Iudicia tua uelut multa abyssus. inde uenit ad salutem hominibus iumentisque communem, quia et ipsa ex misericordia dei est, et dicit: Homines et iumenta saluos facies, domine, sicut multiplicata est misericordia tua, deus, ut hinc intellegamus etiam illam salutem sempiternam et inmortalem, de qua dicit apostolus: Spe enim salui facti sumus, similiter ut istam, quae hominibus iumentisque communis est, gratis nos accipere non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur, quia opera bona ex ipsius iustificatione operamur. ipsius enim sumus figmentum creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis, quae praeparauit deus, ut in illis ambulemus. et illa ergo salus gratuita est, de qua in alio psalmo dicitur: Domini est salus et super populum tuum benedictio tua.

### English translation (Claude)

What follows, "And they will announce his righteousness to a people that will be born, whom the Lord has made," confirms the earlier sense. For what was said there, "The generation to come will be announced to the Lord," is said here as, "They will announce his righteousness." For that very generation which was prophesied to come, the generation of the devout and holy, is the righteousness of God, not their own, lest they be among those who, ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, did not submit to the righteousness of God. For that righteousness of God is commended in the words, "ignorant of the righteousness of God": the righteousness by which we are righteous from his grace, so that we ourselves may be his righteousness when we live righteously, believing in him who justifies the ungodly; not that by which he himself is righteous, his eternal and unchangeable righteousness. This righteousness, then, by which we are righteous by God's gift, is signified in that psalm where it is written, "Your righteousness is like the mountains of God." For the mountains of God are his saints, of whom it is said elsewhere, "Let the mountains receive peace for your people." And much has been written about these mountains in figurative speech, which it would take long to mention now. But because God does this very thing, justifying human beings, by a most hidden judgment, since he does it by free grace ("but if by grace, not by works; otherwise grace is no longer grace"; for good works begin from the time we are justified; we are not justified because they went before; and this is the depth of which we have already said much above), in the same psalm, when he had said, "Your righteousness is like the mountains of God," he at once added, "Your judgments are like a great abyss." From there he comes to the salvation common to men and beasts, because that too is from God's mercy, and says: "Men and beasts you will save, O Lord, as your mercy has been multiplied, O God"; so that from this we may understand that we receive also that everlasting and immortal salvation, of which the apostle says, "For in hope we were saved," freely, like this one which is common to men and beasts, not from works, lest anyone be lifted up; since we do good works from his justification. "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared that we should walk in them." That salvation, then, is free, of which it is said in another psalm: "Salvation is the Lord's, and your blessing is upon your people."

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:30 (21:31 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 36:6 (35:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:3 (71:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 3:8 (3:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX); Rom 10:3; Rom 4:5; Ps 36:6 (35:7 LXX); Ps 72:3 (71:3 LXX); Rom 11:6; Rom 8:24; Eph 2:9–10; Ps 3:8 (3:9 LXX). The doctrine of justification is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.71 (CSEL 44:218–219; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-71).

## Letter 140.72

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-72
- Source: CSEL 44:219–220
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's righteousness, like his salvation, is that which he gives to those he justifies and saves by grace through baptism; pride, trusting in one's own works, is its opposite.

### Latin text

Sicut ergo, quod legitur: Domini est salus, non ea salus intellegitur, qua dominus saluus est, sed qua hi salui sunt, quos ipse saluos facit, sic, cum legitur dei iustitia in eo, quod scriptum est: Ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere, non est illa intellegenda, qua deus iustus est, sed qua iusti sunt homines, quos gratia sua iustificat. inde enim salui, unde iusti, quoniam, quod ait: Non est opus sanis medicus sed male habentibus, exposuit consequenter dicens: Non ueni uocare iustos sed peccatores. non igitur secundum opera iustitiae, quae nos fecimus, sed secundum suam misericordiam saluos nos fecit per lauacrum regenerationis. in qua gratia spe salui facti sumus. unde in illo psalmo subiungitur: Filii autem hominum sub tegmine alarum tuarum sperabunt. inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae et torrente uoluptatis tuae potabis eos, quoniam apud te est fons uitae, in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen. praetende misericordiam tuam scientibus te et iustitiam tuam his, qui recto sunt corde. huic igitur iustitiae dei contraria superbia est, qua fiditur tamquam de operibus propriis, ideoque ibi sequitur: Non ueniat mihi pes superbiae.

### English translation (Claude)

Just as, then, when we read, "Salvation is the Lord's," the salvation meant is not that by which the Lord is saved but that by which those are saved whom he saves, so when we read of God's righteousness in the words, "ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own," that righteousness is not to be understood by which God is righteous, but that by which human beings are righteous whom he justifies by his grace. For they are saved from the same source from which they are righteous; since what he said, "It is not the healthy who need a physician but those who are sick," he went on to explain by saying, "I came not to call the righteous but sinners." "Not according to works of righteousness which we have done, then, but according to his mercy he saved us through the washing of regeneration"; in which grace "we were saved in hope." Hence it is added in that psalm: "But the sons of men will hope under the shelter of your wings; they will be inebriated with the abundance of your house, and you will give them to drink of the torrent of your pleasure; for with you is the fountain of life; in your light we shall see light. Extend your mercy to those who know you, and your righteousness to those who are upright in heart." The opposite of this righteousness of God, then, is pride, by which one trusts as if in one's own works; and so it follows there: "Let not the foot of pride come to me."

### Scripture references

- Ps 3:8 (3:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:7 (35:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:8 (35:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:10 (35:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:11 (35:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 3:8 (3:9 LXX); Rom 10:3; Matt 9:12–13; Titus 3:5; Rom 8:24; Ps 36:7–11 (35:8–12 LXX). "The washing of regeneration" is baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.72 (CSEL 44:219–220; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-72).

## Letter 140.73

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-73
- Source: CSEL 44:220–221
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The grace of the New Testament is the righteousness given to believers: Christ was made 'sin', a sacrifice for sin, so that in his body the church we might be God's righteousness, made righteous by him.

### Latin text

Haec iustitia, qua eius fideles iusti sunt interim uiuentes ex fide, donec perfecta iustitia perducantur ad speciem sicut salute perfecta etiam ad ipsius corporis inmortalitatem, gratia testamenti noui. unde alio loco dicit apostolus: Pro Christo legationem fungimur tamquam deo exhortante per nos; obsecramus pro Christo reconciliari deo; ac deinde subiungit: Eum, qui non nouerat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit — id est sacrificium pro peccatis; nam et ipsa in lege peccata appellabantur, quae pro peccatis offerebantur —, ut nos simus iustitia dei in ipso, id est in eius corpore, quod est ecclesia, cui caput est, nos simus iustitia dei, quam ignorantes illi et suam uolentes constituere, id est tamquam de suis operibus gloriantes iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. inde et in hoc psalmo, cum dixisset: Adnuntiabunt iustitiam eius, sequitur et adiungit: Populo, qui nascetur, quem fecit dominus. quis est enim populus, quem non fecit dominus secundum id, quod homines sunt, qui etiam pecora creauit, a quo est omnis uita omnisque facta et creata natura? sed ita intellegendum est quem fecit dominus, ut non solum quod homines sunt, uerum etiam quod iusti sunt, ab illo facti intellegantur secundum illud, quod iam non semel commemoraui ab apostolo dictum: Ipsius sumus figmentum creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis, quae praeparauit deus, ut in illis ambulemus.

### English translation (Claude)

This righteousness, by which his faithful are righteous while living meanwhile by faith, until they are brought by perfect righteousness to sight, as by perfect salvation even to the immortality of the body itself, is the grace of the New Testament. Hence the apostle says in another place: "We are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were exhorting through us; we beseech you for Christ, be reconciled to God"; and then he adds: "Him who knew no sin he made sin for us" (that is, a sacrifice for sins; for in the law the very offerings made for sins were called sins), "so that we might be the righteousness of God in him": that is, in his body, which is the church, of which he is the head, we might be the righteousness of God, which they, being ignorant of it and wishing to establish their own, that is, glorying as it were in their own works, did not submit to the righteousness of God. Hence also in this psalm, when he had said, "They will announce his righteousness," he goes on to add: "to a people that will be born, whom the Lord has made." For what people is there that the Lord has not made, as regards their being human beings, he who created even the cattle, from whom is all life and every made and created nature? But "whom the Lord has made" is to be understood in such a way that not only their being human but also their being righteous is understood to be made by him, according to what I have already more than once mentioned as said by the apostle: "We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared that we should walk in them."

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:21: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 4:24: allusion, low confidence
- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:20–21; Rom 10:3; Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX); Eph 2:10. Augustine's reading of "sin" as "sacrifice for sin" draws on Lev 4 (e.g. 4:3, 24 in the Old Latin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.73 (CSEL 44:220–221; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-73).

## Letter 140.74

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-74
- Source: CSEL 44:221–222
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The soul cannot be good by its own will but only by God's free mercy; the wise virgins carry the oil of a good conscience, while the foolish depend on the praise of flatterers.

### Latin text

Animae igitur rationalis mutabilitas admonetur, quo nouerit nisi participatione incommutabilis boni iustam, saluam, sapientem, beatam se esse non posse nec sibi eam bonum esse posse propria uoluntate sed malum. propria quippe uoluntate auertitur a bono incommutabili eaque auersione uitiatur; nec sanari per se ipsam potest sed gratuita misericordia sui creatoris, quae in hac uita eam ex fide uiuentem in spe constituit salutis aeternae. unde non altum sapiat, sed timeat eoque timore casto inhaereat deo, qui eam a propria inmunditia, qua inordinate bona inferiora dilexit, uelut a quadam spiritali fornicatione mundauit; nec humanis laudibus extollatur, ne sit in uirginibus stultis aliena laude laetantibus — hoc enim de quaestionibus tuis restat extremum — et propter ipsam inanem laudem, non propter conscientiam suam, ubi illis testis est deus, bona operantibus, sed sit in uirginibus sapientibus, ubi dicat, quod apostolus ait: Nam gloria nostra haec est, testimonium conscientiae nostrae. hoc est enim oleum ferre secum, non a uendentibus emere, hoc est adulantibus; adulatores namque laudem suam tamquam oleum uenditant stultis. de hoc oleo dicitur in psalmo: Emendabit me iustus in misericordia et arguet me, oleum autem peccatoris non inpinguabit caput meum; elegit a iusto misericorditer reprehendi et quodam modo colaphizari, quam, ut ei caput in superbiam crescat, peccatoris adulatione laudari.

### English translation (Claude)

The changeableness of the rational soul, then, is reminded that it may know that it cannot be righteous, saved, wise, or happy except by participation in the unchangeable good, and that it cannot be good to itself by its own will, but only evil. For by its own will it turns away from the unchangeable good and is corrupted by that turning away; nor can it be healed by itself, but only by the free mercy of its creator, which in this life establishes it, living by faith, in the hope of eternal salvation. Let it therefore not be high-minded, but fear, and by that chaste fear cleave to God, who has cleansed it from its own uncleanness, by which it loved lower goods in a disordered way, as from a kind of spiritual fornication. And let it not be lifted up by human praise, lest it be among the foolish virgins who rejoice in the praise of others (for this is the last of your questions), doing good works for the sake of that empty praise, not for the sake of their conscience, where God is their witness; but let it be among the wise virgins, where it may say what the apostle says: "For this is our glory, the testimony of our conscience." For this is to carry oil with oneself, not to buy it from those who sell, that is, from flatterers; for flatterers sell their praise like oil to fools. Of this oil it is said in the psalm: "The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me; but the oil of the sinner will not anoint my head." He chose to be rebuked mercifully by the righteous, and in a way struck, rather than to be praised by the flattery of the sinner so that his head might grow in pride.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:20: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:9: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:12: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:20; Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX); Matt 25:1–13; 2 Cor 1:12; Ps 141:5 (140:5 LXX, Old Latin). This section begins Augustine's answer to the question on the ten virgins.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.74 (CSEL 44:221–222; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-74).

## Letter 140.75

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-75
- Source: CSEL 44:222–224
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The wise virgins' reply is humble; their lamps are good works done for God's glory and fed by the oil of a good conscience, while the foolish virgins' lamps fail when human praise is withdrawn.

### Latin text

Inridentium quippe responsio mihi uidetur, cum eis a sapientibus uirginibus dicitur: Ite potius ad uendentes et emite uobis, sicut in quodam libro sapientiae scriptum est, ubi contemptoribus dicit: Et ego uestrae perditioni superridebo. illa autem responsio, qua petentibus oleum dictum est: Ne forte non sufficiat nobis, non desperanter sed humiliter dictum est; quis enim sic praesumat de conscientia sua, ut certus sit eam sibi in iudicio dei posse sufficere, nisi misericordes misericorditer iudicet? iudicium enim sine misericordia illi, qui non fecit misericordiam. ipsae autem sunt lampades accensae opera scilicet bona, de quibus dominus dicit: Luceant opera uestra coram hominibus, ut uideant bona facta uestra et glorificent patrem uestrum, qui in caelis est. hucusque pertendit intentio uirginum sapientium, ut ideo uelint uideri ab hominibus bona opera sua, non quo ab eis laudentur ipsae, sed ut glorificetur deus, a quo illis est, quod bene operantur; ac per hoc interiore bono gaudent, quod est coram deo, ubi elemosyna in occulto, ut pater, qui uidet in occulto, reddat. et ideo non deficiunt lampades, quia interiore oleo uegetantur, id est intentione bonae conscientiae, qua coram deo fit in eius gloriam, quicquid coram hominibus in bonis operibus lucet. at uero stultarum uirginum hoc oleum non secum portantium deficiunt lampades, id est non perseueranter bona opera lucent, cum laus fuerit humana subtracta, propter quam illa faciebant hucusque intentionem suam perducentes, ut uiderentur ab hominibus, non ut glorificaretur pater, qui in caelis est, quae intentio perennis est gloriae, qua nouit anima deo se debere, quod iustificata est ad facienda opera bona, et ideo in illo, non in se laudari amat. unde alibi homo dei cantat: In domino laudabitur anima mea, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur.

### English translation (Claude)

It seems to me a reply of mockery when the wise virgins say to them, "Go rather to those who sell and buy for yourselves," as it is written in a certain book of wisdom where it says to the scorners: "And I will laugh at your destruction." But the reply by which those asking for oil were told, "Lest perhaps there not be enough for us," was said not in despair but in humility; for who would so presume on his own conscience as to be sure that it can suffice him at the judgment of God, unless he judges the merciful mercifully? For "judgment without mercy to him who has shown no mercy." The lamps themselves, lit, are good works, of which the Lord says: "Let your works shine before men, so that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father who is in heaven." The intention of the wise virgins extends this far: they wish their good works to be seen by men, not so that they themselves may be praised by them, but so that God may be glorified, from whom they have the power to work well; and so they rejoice in the inner good, which is before God, where alms are given in secret, so that the Father who sees in secret may repay. And therefore their lamps do not fail, because they are fed by inner oil, that is, by the intention of a good conscience, by which whatever shines before men in good works is done before God for his glory. But the lamps of the foolish virgins, who do not carry this oil with them, fail; that is, their good works do not shine perseveringly when human praise has been withdrawn, for the sake of which they did them, carrying their intention only so far as to be seen by men, not so that the Father who is in heaven might be glorified. That intention is of everlasting glory, by which the soul knows that it owes it to God that it has been justified to do good works, and therefore loves to be praised in him, not in itself. Hence elsewhere the man of God sings: "In the Lord my soul shall be praised," so that "he who glories may glory in the Lord."

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:9: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 1:26: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:4: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:8: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 25:8–9; Prov 1:26 (the "book of wisdom"); Jas 2:13; Matt 5:16; Matt 6:4; Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX); 1 Cor 1:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.75 (CSEL 44:222–224; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-75).

## Letter 140.76

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-76
- Source: CSEL 44:224–225
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: That all the virgins slept means that both kinds of believers die, death being called sleep because of the resurrection; they await the coming of the bridegroom, Christ.

### Latin text

Sed quid est, quod in eadem euangelii lectione scriptum est omnes sponso tardante dormisse? si somnum istum intellexerimus, quod uelut tardante iudicio, ad quod faciendum uenturus est Christus, abundante iniquitate caritas refrigescit, quo modo ibi ponemus uirgines sapientes, cum potius in illis sint, de quibus dicitur: Qui autem perseuerauerit usque in finem, hic saluus erit? dictum est ergo: Dormierunt omnes, quia non tantum stulti, qui propter humanam laudem bene operantur coram hominibus, uerum etiam sapientes, qui hoc propterea faciunt, ut laudetur deus, experiuntur istam mortem; ex utroque enim genere moriuntur. et ista mors saepe in scripturis dormientium dicitur propter futuram resurrectionem uelut euigilationem. hinc apostolus dicit: De dormientibus autem nolo uos ignorare, fratres, et alio loco: Ex quibus plures manent usque adhuc; quidam autem dormierunt; et alia innumerabilia in hoc testimonia aperte per scripturas utriusque testamenti reperiuntur. unde et ille ait: Consanguineus leti sopor et, si aduertas, multa inuenies etiam in saecularibus litteris, ubi mors somno comparatur. significauit ergo dominus futurum fuisse tempus, quo inter tribulationes temptationesque huius saeculi iam iamque eius expectaretur et speraretur aduentus tamquam propinquus atque imminens, ad quem se praeparent, qui in eius esse familia uidentur. hoc est enim, quod ait exisse obuiam sponso et sponsae, sponso quidem filio dei, sponsae autem, siue quia in eo corpore uenturus est, quod sumpsit ex uirgine, siue quia ipsa ecclesia tunc clarior apparebit, ut ad uniuersi corporis congregationem membra concurrant, quibus concurrentibus eius magnitudo monstrabitur.

### English translation (Claude)

But what does it mean that in the same Gospel reading it is written that all slept while the bridegroom delayed? If we understand this sleep to be that, as the judgment which Christ is to come to carry out seems to delay, love grows cold as iniquity abounds, how shall we place the wise virgins there, when they are rather among those of whom it is said, "But he who perseveres to the end will be saved"? It is said, then, "They all slept," because not only the foolish, who do good before men for the sake of human praise, but also the wise, who do it so that God may be praised, experience this death; for people of both kinds die. And this death is often called in the Scriptures the death of sleepers, because of the future resurrection as an awakening. Hence the apostle says: "Concerning those who sleep, I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers"; and in another place: "of whom most remain until now, but some have fallen asleep"; and countless other testimonies on this are found plainly in the Scriptures of both Testaments. Hence that poet too says, "Sleep, the kinsman of death"; and if you pay attention, you will find many passages even in secular literature where death is compared to sleep. The Lord therefore signified that there would be a time when, amid the tribulations and temptations of this world, his coming would be awaited and hoped for from moment to moment, as near and imminent, for which those who are seen to be in his household should prepare themselves. For this is what he says, that they went out to meet the bridegroom and the bride: the bridegroom, the Son of God; the bride, either because he will come in the body which he took from the virgin, or because the church herself will then appear more glorious, as the members run together to the gathering of the whole body, and as they run together its greatness will be shown.

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:1: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 6.278 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 25:5; Matt 24:12–13; 1 Thess 4:13; 1 Cor 15:6; Virgil, Aeneid 6.278 ("consanguineus Leti Sopor"). "The bridegroom and the bride" follows the Old Latin of Matt 25:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.76 (CSEL 44:224–225; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-76).

## Letter 140.77

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-77
- Source: CSEL 44:225–226
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The virgins signify continence and the five senses, the lamps good works, and the oil the inner intention of loving God; the foolish lack it because they ascribe their good works to themselves and delight in praise.

### Latin text

Virgines propter continentiam nuncupauit, decem uero, id est quinque et quinque propter numerum, quo censentur corporis sensus, in quibus habitat continentia, cum a uoluptatibus turpibus et inlicitis abstinetur. lampades, sicut dictum est, bona sunt opera maximeque ad misericordiam pertinentia et ipsa, quae etiam coram hominibus lucet, laudabilis conuersatio. sed magni interest, qua mentis intentione fiat; ideo dicit alias sapientes alias stultas, sed hinc eas discernit, quod stultae non sumpserunt oleum secum, sapientes autem acceperunt oleum in uasis suis, hoc est in cordibus suis, ubi fit ipsa participatio intimi ac superni boni. unde in psalmo quodam, cum dictum esset: Sacrificate sacrificium iustitiae et sperate in domino, multi, inquit, dicunt: Quis ostendit nobis bona? deinde ut manifestaret, cuius boni amore debeamus operari iustitiam, hoc est sacrificare sacrificium iustitiae, signatum est, inquit, in nobis lumen uultus tui, domine; dedisti laetitiam in corde meo. cuius boni aliquantum participati et plenius perfectiusque participandi intentione qui bene operatur et laudabiliter etiam in conspectu hominum conuersatur, habet oleum secum, quo bona opera eius etiam in conspectu hominum lucentia non extinguantur, quia non in eius corde caritas refrigescit abundante iniquitate, sed perseuerat usque in finem. hoc oleum stultae uirgines non habent secum, quoniam sibi tribuendo, si quid boni operis faciunt, necesse est inflentur superbia et propter hoc uitium sic laude delectentur humana, ut eius gaudio, si quid boni agunt, feruere et lucere uideantur.

### English translation (Claude)

He called them virgins because of continence; and ten, that is, five and five, because of the number by which the bodily senses are counted, in which continence dwells when one abstains from shameful and unlawful pleasures. The lamps, as has been said, are good works, especially those belonging to mercy, and a praiseworthy way of life itself, which shines even before men. But it matters greatly with what intention of mind it is done; so he calls some wise and others foolish, but he distinguishes them by this: that the foolish did not take oil with them, while the wise took oil in their vessels, that is, in their hearts, where the very participation in the inmost and highest good takes place. Hence in a certain psalm, when it had been said, "Offer the sacrifice of righteousness and hope in the Lord," he says: "Many say, Who shows us good things?" Then, to make clear for love of what good we ought to work righteousness, that is, to offer the sacrifice of righteousness, he says: "The light of your face, Lord, is sealed upon us; you have put gladness in my heart." Whoever works well and lives praiseworthily even in the sight of men with the intention of this good, in which he already shares somewhat and is to share more fully and perfectly, has oil with him, by which his good works, shining even in the sight of men, are not extinguished; because love does not grow cold in his heart as iniquity abounds, but perseveres to the end. This oil the foolish virgins do not have with them, since, attributing to themselves whatever good work they do, they must be puffed up with pride, and because of this vice so delight in human praise that by the joy of it they seem to glow and shine in whatever good they do.

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:3: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 4:5 (4:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 4:6 (4:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 4:7 (4:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 25:2–4; Ps 4:5–7 (4:6–7 LXX, Old Latin); Matt 24:12–13. The number five referred to the five senses is Augustine's interpretation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.77 (CSEL 44:225–226; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-77).

## Letter 140.78

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-78
- Source: CSEL 44:226–227
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bridegroom comes at midnight, when his coming is hidden; the cry is the trumpet of the resurrection, and the virgins trimming their lamps prepare to give account of their works.

### Latin text

Tardante autem sponso dormierunt omnes. non enim tunc ueniet, cum speratur, sed media nocte, cum ualde obscurum, id est occultum erit, an ueniat. unde dicit media nocte clamorem factum: Ecce sponsus uenit, exite obuiam ei. nimirum clamor iste ipsa est tuba illa, quam commemorat apostolus, ubi dicit: Canet enim tuba et mortui resurgent incorrupti. tubae nomine aliquod euidentissimum et praeclarissimum signum uult intellegi, quam uocem archangeli et tubam dei alio loco dicit. quae etiam uox ipsius domini Iesu Christi in euangelio dicitur, quam audient hi, qui in monumentis sunt, et procedent. surgunt ergo omnes illae uirgines et sapientes et stultae et aptant lampades suas, id est rationem praeparant reddere de operibus suis.

### English translation (Claude)

"But while the bridegroom delayed, they all slept." For he will not come when he is hoped for, but at midnight, when it will be very obscure, that is, hidden, whether he is coming. Hence he says that at midnight a cry was raised: "Behold, the bridegroom comes; go out to meet him." Doubtless this cry is that very trumpet which the apostle mentions when he says: "For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will rise incorruptible." By the name of trumpet he wishes some most evident and most glorious sign to be understood, which in another place he calls the voice of the archangel and the trumpet of God. It is also called in the Gospel the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ himself, which those who are in the tombs will hear and will come forth. All those virgins, then, both wise and foolish, rise and trim their lamps, that is, prepare to give account of their works.

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:5: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:52: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:28: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:29: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 25:5–7; 1 Cor 15:52; 1 Thess 4:16; John 5:28–29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.78 (CSEL 44:226–227; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-78).

## Letter 140.79

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-79
- Source: CSEL 44:227–228
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: At the judgment human praise will vanish; the foolish virgins, who trusted in their own righteousness, find no oil, while the wise trust only in God's mercy and glory in the Lord.

### Latin text

Sed tunc illius clamoris euidentia et resurrectione mortuorum quia nulla erit dubitatio iam instantis praesentisque iudicii, subtrahetur omne solatium laudis humanae. neque enim uacabit de alio disceptare uel de alio iudicare aut gratificari atque suffragari alteri, quando unusquisque proprium onus portabit et de suorum factorum reddenda ratione cogitabit. ac per hoc feretur quidem animus uirginum stultarum consuetudine propria, sed non inuentis humanis laudibus deficiet. neque enim germanitus dixerunt: Apud te laus mea, uel: In domino laudabitur anima mea, aut in domino gloriatae sunt, cum ignorantes dei iustitiam iustitiam suam constituerent. ac per hoc petant a sapientibus oleum, hoc est aliquam consolationem: nec inueniunt nec accipiunt illis respondentibus se nescire, utrum uel sibi sufficiat ipsa conscientia, qua expectant misericordiam sub illo iudice, qui cum in throno sederit, quis gloriabitur castum se habere cor aut quis gloriabitur mundum se esse a peccato, nisi superexultet misericordia iudicio, quae super eos erit, qui misericordiae opera illa intentione fecerunt, ut eorum misereretur, a quo se sciebant accepisse, quod habebant, nec gloriabantur, quasi non acceperint, sed per se ipsos habuerint, quo placerent, sicut stulti, qui et sibi placent tamquam de bono a se sibi parato et ab adulantibus uel errantibus ita laudantur, ac si ipsi sint aliquid. qui autem putat se esse aliquid, cum nihil sit, sicut dicit apostolus, se ipsum seducit. opus autem suum probet unusquisque et tunc in se ipso tantum gloriam habebit et non in altero. hoc est portare oleum secum, non ex aliena laude dependere. sed quam gloriam in se habebit nisi eum, cui dicitur: Gloria mea et exaltans caput meum, ut, quod saepe dicendum est, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur?

### English translation (Claude)

But then, because by the evidence of that cry and by the resurrection of the dead there will be no doubt of the judgment now at hand and present, every consolation of human praise will be withdrawn. For there will be no leisure to discuss another or to judge another, or to favor and support another, when each one will carry his own burden and think of the account to be given of his own deeds. And so the minds of the foolish virgins will indeed be carried along by their own habit, but, finding no human praise, they will fail. For they did not genuinely say, "With you is my praise," or, "In the Lord my soul shall be praised," nor did they glory in the Lord, when, ignorant of the righteousness of God, they established their own righteousness. And so they ask the wise for oil, that is, some consolation; they neither find nor receive it, since the wise answer that they do not know whether even their own conscience will suffice for themselves, by which they await mercy under that judge: for when he sits on his throne, who will boast that he has a chaste heart, or who will boast that he is clean from sin, unless mercy triumphs over judgment? Mercy will be upon those who did works of mercy with this intention, that he might have mercy on them from whom they knew they had received what they had; and they did not boast as if they had not received it but had of themselves the means to please, like the foolish, who both please themselves as if with a good prepared by themselves for themselves, and are praised by flatterers or by those in error as though they were something. But "if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing," as the apostle says, "he deceives himself. But let each one test his own work, and then he will have glory in himself alone and not in another." This is to carry oil with oneself, not to depend on another's praise. But what glory will he have in himself except him to whom it is said, "My glory, and the one who lifts up my head," so that, as must often be said, "he who glories may glory in the Lord"?

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:5: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:25 (21:26 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:8: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 20:8: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 20:9: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 3:3 (3:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 6:5; Ps 22:25 (21:26 LXX); Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX); Rom 10:3; Matt 25:8–9; Prov 20:8–9 (Old Latin); Jas 2:13; 1 Cor 4:7; Gal 6:3–4; Ps 3:3 (3:4 LXX); 1 Cor 1:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.79 (CSEL 44:227–228; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-79).

## Letter 140.80

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-80
- Source: CSEL 44:228–229
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Wisdom mocks the foolish virgins, who still crave empty glory, while the wise, glorying in the Lord, enter the wedding feast and the joy of their Lord.

### Latin text

Proinde sapientia, quae in sapientibus uirginibus habitat, secundum illud, quod ante praedixit, cum ait contemptoribus et sanam doctrinam accipere recusantibus: Et ego uestrae perditioni superridebo, dicit uirginibus stultis: Ite potius ad uendentes et emite uobis, tamquam diceret: Ubi sunt, qui uos fallebant mendosissimis laudibus, quando et a uobis fallebamini, quia in uobis non in domino gloriabamini? quod autem dicit: Et dum eunt emere, uenit sponsus et, quae paratae erant, intrauerunt cum eo, hoc mihi uidetur intellegendum, quod uitioso cordis affectu inhiabunt inani gloriae, quam uanae mentis elatione sectatae sunt. et ipse appetitus significatus est in eo, quod dictum est: Dum eunt emere. uenit autem sponsus et introierunt cum eo ad nuptias, quae praeparatae erant, hoc est quae ueram fidem ueramque pietatem corde gestabant, qua possent contemperari numero societatique sanctorum non in se ipsis sed in domino gloriantium, ut intrarent cum eis illud gaudium, de quo dicitur: Intra in gaudium domini tui, ubi erit perfecta participatio incommutabilis boni, cuius modo uelut arra quaedam per fidem tenetur, ut secundum hanc gratiam uiuamus, in quantum deo non nobis uiuimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, the wisdom that dwells in the wise virgins, in keeping with what it foretold when it said to the scorners and to those refusing to accept sound teaching, "And I will laugh at your destruction," says to the foolish virgins: "Go rather to those who sell and buy for yourselves"; as if it said: Where are those who deceived you with most false praises, when you were also deceived by yourselves, because you gloried in yourselves, not in the Lord? And when it says, "And while they were going to buy, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went in with him," this seems to me to be understood thus: that with the vicious affection of their heart they will gape after the empty glory which they pursued with the elation of a vain mind. And this very craving is signified in the words, "while they were going to buy." But the bridegroom came, and those went in with him to the wedding who were ready, that is, who carried in their heart the true faith and true piety by which they could be fitted into the number and fellowship of the saints who glory not in themselves but in the Lord, so as to enter with them into that joy of which it is said, "Enter into the joy of your lord," where there will be perfect participation in the unchangeable good, of which now a kind of pledge is held by faith, so that we may live according to this grace, in so far as we live to God and not to ourselves.

### Scripture references

- Prov 1:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:21: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:22: echo, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 5:15: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 1:26; Matt 25:9–10; Matt 25:21; 2 Cor 1:22 (pledge); 2 Cor 5:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.80 (CSEL 44:228–229; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-80).

## Letter 140.81

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-81
- Source: CSEL 44:229–230
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The foolish virgins seek mercy too late; 'I do not know you' means they did not know God, for knowing God is itself his gift, as he makes us righteous, his workmanship in Christ.

### Latin text

Proinde quod sequitur: Nouissime ueniunt et reliquae uirgines dicentes: Domine, domine, aperi nobis, non dictum est eas emisse oleum et sic uenisse, neque enim iam erat unde, sed misericordiam sero quaesisse, cum iam tempus iudicandi esset et probos a reprobis separandi. recte autem illis respondetur: Amen dico uobis, nescio uos; ille quippe hoc dicit, quem non latet aliquid. sed: Nescio uos nihil est aliud quam: Nescitis me, quando de uobis potius eligitis confidere quam de me. cum enim dicitur, quod nos cognoscit deus, cognitionem sui nobis praestat, ut per hoc intellegamus ne hoc quidem nobis esse tribuendum, quod nos scimus deum, sed eam quoque scientiam illius misericordiae tribuamus. unde, cum quodam loco apostolus diceret: Nunc autem cognoscentes deum, correxit et ait: Immo cogniti a deo quid aliud uolens intellegi, nisi quod eos ipse fecerit cognitores suos? nemo autem cognoscit deum, nisi qui intellegit illud esse summum atque incommutabile bonum, cuius participatione fit bonus, quod in huius psalmi conclusione positum est: Adnuntiabunt iustitiam eius populo, qui nascetur, quem fecit dominus; inde est et illud, quod in alio psalmo: Ipse fecit nos et non ipsi nos. hoc enim non ad eam naturam, qua homines sumus, cuius naturae idem ipse creator est, qui caeli et terrae et siderum omniumque animantium. sed ad illud potius referendum est, quod apostolus ait: Ipsius enim sumus figmentum creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis, quae praeparauit deus, ut in illis ambulemus.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, in what follows, "Afterward the other virgins also came, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us," it is not said that they had bought oil and so came, for there was no longer any source, but that they sought mercy too late, when it was already the time of judging and separating the good from the reprobate. And rightly they are answered, "Truly I say to you, I do not know you"; for he says this from whom nothing is hidden. But "I do not know you" is nothing other than "You do not know me," since you choose to trust in yourselves rather than in me. For when it is said that God knows us, he grants us knowledge of himself, so that by this we may understand that not even this is to be attributed to ourselves, that we know God, but that we should attribute this knowledge too to his mercy. Hence, when the apostle said in a certain place, "But now knowing God," he corrected himself and said, "or rather known by God"; what else did he wish to be understood than that he himself had made them knowers of him? But no one knows God except one who understands that he is the highest and unchangeable good, by participation in which one becomes good; which is set down in the conclusion of this psalm: "They will announce his righteousness to a people that will be born, whom the Lord has made"; from which comes also what is in another psalm: "He made us, and not we ourselves." For this is to be referred not to the nature by which we are human beings, of which nature the same one is creator who created heaven and earth and the stars and all living things, but rather to what the apostle says: "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared that we should walk in them."

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:11: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:9: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 100:3 (99:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 25:11–12; Gal 4:9; Ps 22:31 (21:32 LXX); Ps 100:3 (99:3 LXX); Eph 2:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.81 (CSEL 44:229–230; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-81).

## Letter 140.82

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-82
- Source: CSEL 44:230–231
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sums up: all five questions have been answered within the sixth, on the grace of the New Testament, by which the Son of God became man so that we might become children of God.

### Latin text

Arbitror tibi satis quinque tuas solutas quaestiones, dum in ista mea ueluti sexta inmorarer, quam mihi proposui de gratia testamenti noui, propter quam uerbum caro factum est, id est, qui dei filius erat, homo factus est naturam suscipiendo nostram non amittendo suam, per quod et nobis recipientibus eum potestas daretur, ut, qui eramus homines, filii dei fieremus participatione incommutabilis boni in melius commutati non ad temporalem felicitatem sed ad uitae aeternae, quae sola beata est, adoptionem. unde placuit etiam propheticum psalmum percurrere, cuius primum uersum in passione commemorauit ostendens, quo modo nos deus derelinquat et quo alio modo non recedat a nobis, ad bona aeterna nos colligens temporalia uero aliquando utiliter tribuens et aliquando utiliter subtrahens, ut eis non haerere discamus, ne contempta luce interiore, quae ad nouam pertinet uitam — unde etiam psalmus iste ipse pro susceptione matutina tamquam pro luce noua nomen accepit —, ne in exteris tenebris libenter habitemus, unde in exteriores mittuntur, qui ex istis exteris non se ad interiora conuertunt, ne diabolo et eius angelis sociati extrema damnatione puniamur. intellegentes igitur peregrinationem nostram in hac uita mundo crucifigamur extendentes manus in latitudine bonorum operum et longanimitate usque in finem perseuerantes atque habentes cor sursum, ubi Christus est in dextera dei sedens, totumque hoc non nobis sed illius misericordiae tribuentes, cuius profunda iudicia omnem scrutatorem fatigant. haec est enim non inaniter fabulosa sed utiliter uerax latitudo, longitudo, altitudo, profundum, unde perueniamus etiam ad supereminentem scientiam caritatis Christi et impleamur in omnem plenitudinem dei.

### English translation (Claude)

I think your five questions have been sufficiently resolved while I lingered on this sixth of mine, which I put to myself, on the grace of the New Testament, for the sake of which the Word was made flesh; that is, he who was the Son of God became man, taking our nature without losing his own, so that power might also be given to us who receive him, that we who were men might become sons of God, changed for the better by participation in the unchangeable good, not for temporal happiness but for adoption to eternal life, which alone is happy. Hence I thought it good also to run through the prophetic psalm whose first verse he recalled in his passion, showing how God forsakes us and in what other way he does not depart from us, gathering us to eternal goods, while sometimes usefully granting temporal goods and sometimes usefully withdrawing them, so that we may learn not to cling to them; lest, despising the inner light which belongs to the new life (hence this very psalm took its title "for the morning taking up", as for a new light), we should willingly dwell in the exterior darkness, from which those who do not turn from it to the inner things are sent into the outer, lest, joined to the devil and his angels, we be punished with the final condemnation. Understanding, then, our pilgrimage in this life, let us be crucified to the world, stretching out our hands in the breadth of good works, persevering with long-suffering to the end, and having our heart on high, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God, and attributing all this not to ourselves but to his mercy, whose deep judgments weary every searcher. For this is the breadth, length, height, and depth, not idly fabulous but usefully true, from which we may come also to the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge and be filled with all the fullness of God.

### Scripture references

- John 1:14: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:12: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:1: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:12, 14; Ps 22 title (21:1 LXX, "pro susceptione matutina"); Gal 6:14; Col 3:1; Rom 11:33; Eph 3:18–19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.82 (CSEL 44:230–231; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-82).

## Letter 140.83

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-83
- Source: CSEL 44:231–232
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine has stressed the grace of the New Testament because it has adversaries, continent and orthodox about Christ, who yet attribute their goodness to themselves; they resemble the foolish virgins.

### Latin text

Scio autem, quam non superuacanea sollicitudine per hanc occasionem quaestionum mihi abs te propositarum testamenti noui gratiam tibi uoluerim copiosius commendare. habet enim aduersarios, qui eius profunditate turbati non deo tribuere sed potius sibi nolunt adrogare, quod boni sunt. nec tales sunt, quos facile contemnas, sed continenter uiuentes atque in bonis operibus laudabiles nec falsum Christum sicut Manichaei aliique plurimi haeretici sed eundem uerum, aequalem patri et coaeternum ueraciterque hominem factum et uenisse credentes et uenturum expectantes, sed tamen ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam constituere uolentes. neque enim frustra dominus, cum et illas commemoraret, quae secum intrauerunt ad nuptias, et illas, contra quas clausit et quibus respondit: Nescio uos, utrasque uirgines dixit propter continentiam et quinque propter concupiscentiam carnis edomitam, quinario praeditam sensu, ornatas utrasque lampadibus propter bonorum operum bonaeque conuersationis in conspectu hominum luculentissimam laudem, utrasque obuiam sponso euntes propter expectationem, qua Christi speratur aduentus, sed tamen alias sapientes alias stultas, quod sapientes oleum acceperint in uasis suis, stultae autem hoc non ferant secum; in tam multis pares hoc solo eas dispares monstrat, hoc solo diuersa eis et contraria nomina inponit.

### English translation (Claude)

I know, moreover, with what far from superfluous anxiety I have wished, on the occasion of the questions you put to me, to commend the grace of the New Testament to you more fully. For it has adversaries who, troubled by its depth, refuse to attribute to God, but would rather claim for themselves, the fact that they are good. Nor are they such as you could easily despise; they live continently and are praiseworthy in good works, and they believe in no false Christ, as the Manichaeans and very many other heretics do, but in the same true Christ, equal and coeternal with the Father, and truly made man, believing that he has come and awaiting his coming; yet they are ignorant of the righteousness of God and wish to establish their own. For not in vain did the Lord, when he mentioned both those who went in with him to the wedding and those against whom he shut the door and to whom he answered, "I do not know you," call both virgins because of continence, five because of the desire of the flesh subdued, endowed with the fivefold sense, both adorned with lamps because of the most brilliant praise of good works and good conduct in the sight of men, both going to meet the bridegroom because of the expectation by which Christ's coming is hoped for, but nevertheless some wise and others foolish, because the wise took oil in their vessels while the foolish did not carry it with them. Alike in so many things, he shows them unlike in this alone; in this alone he gives them different and opposite names.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:10: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine is alluding to the Pelagians (not named here). Rom 10:3; Matt 25:1–12. Translated as written; no editorial judgment is added.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.83 (CSEL 44:231–232; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-83).

## Letter 140.84

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-84
- Source: CSEL 44:232–233
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The wise virgins understand that continence is God's gift; the foolish, ungrateful to the giver, will remain outside unless they change before death.

### Latin text

Quid enim tam coniunctum quam uirgines et uirgines, quinque et quinque, lampadibus ornatae, obuiam sponso euntes, et istae et illae? et quid tam contrarium quam sapientes et stultae? uidelicet quod istae oleum in uasis, hoc est intellegentiam gratiae dei portant in cordibus suis scientes, quod nemo esse possit continens, nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum sapientiae deputantes scire, cuius hoc donum sit; illae autem largitori omnium bonorum gratias non agentes euanuerunt in cogitationibus suis et obscuratum est insipiens cor earum; dicentes se esse sapientes stultae factae sunt. de quibus sane nullo modo nunc desperandum est, antequam dormiamus, sed si ita dormierint, cum factus fuerit clamor ille, quo adesse iam nuntiabitur sponsus, et euigilantes, hoc est resurgentes remanserint foris, non quia uirgines non sunt, sed quia nescientes, unde habeant, quod sunt, stultae uirgines sunt meritoque foris erunt, quia internae affectum gratiae non secum ferunt.

### English translation (Claude)

For what is so closely joined as virgins and virgins, five and five, adorned with lamps, going to meet the bridegroom, these and those alike? And what is so opposite as wise and foolish? Namely, because the former carry oil in their vessels, that is, the understanding of the grace of God in their hearts, knowing that no one can be continent unless God gives it, and counting it wisdom to know whose gift this is; whereas the latter, not giving thanks to the giver of all good things, became vain in their reasonings, and their foolish heart was darkened; claiming to be wise, they became foolish. Of these, indeed, we must by no means despair now, before we sleep; but if they sleep in this state, and when that cry has been raised by which the bridegroom will be announced as now present, they awake, that is, rise again, and remain outside, it will not be because they are not virgins, but because, not knowing whence they have what they are, they are foolish virgins, and rightly they will be outside, because they do not carry with them the affection of inner grace.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:22: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:10: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wisdom 8:21 (Old Latin, "no one can be continent unless God gives it"); Rom 1:21–22; Matt 25:6, 10–12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.84 (CSEL 44:232–233; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-84).

## Letter 140.85

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-85
- Source: CSEL 44:233–235
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Honoratus to persuade such people that every good, even love of God, is God's gift, so that they may glory in the Lord; he closes by commending reading and prayer, for the inner light is the true teacher.

### Latin text

Quando ergo tales reppereris, non tibi persuadeant inanitatem uasorum suorum sed tu eis potius plenitudinem. unde ait apostolus: Quisquis se putat aliquid scire, nondum scit, quem ad modum oportet scire; et mox ostendens, quid dixerit: Quisquis autem, inquit, diligit deum, hic cognitus est ab illo. nec sic dicere uoluit: Cognouit illum, sed dicendo cognitus est ab illo expressius uoluit commendare etiam hoc ab illo nobis esse, ut eum diligamus. caritas enim dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris non per nos ipsos sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. necesse est autem, ut parum diligat deum, qui non ab illo sed a se ipso bonum se arbitratur effectum. unde autem fieri potest, ut talis non in se ipso sed in domino glorietur? qui enim gloriatur, quod sit bonus, in illo debet gloriari, a quo factus est bonus, ac per hoc, qui se a semet ipso factum bonum arbitratur, consequens est, ut in se ipso non in domino glorietur. omnis autem intentio gratiae testamenti noui, qua sursum cor habemus, quia omne datum optimum et omne donum perfectum desursum est, id agit, ne simus ingrati, atque in ipsa gratiarum actione nihil aliud agitur, nisi ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. Habes librum etsi prolixum tamen, quantum existimo, non superfluum. sed ama etiam ecclesiasticas legere litteras et non multa inuenies, quae requiras ex me; sed legendo et ruminando, si etiam pure deum largitorem bonorum omnium depreceris, omnia, quae cognitione digna sunt, aut certe plurima ipso magis inspirante quam hominum aliquo commonente perdisces. quamquam eo ipso, quo forinsecus bene admonentem iudicio non errante adprobamus, quid aliud quam internum lumen magistrum nos habere testamur?

### English translation (Claude)

When, therefore, you find such people, let them not persuade you of the emptiness of their vessels, but rather you persuade them of fullness. Hence the apostle says: "Whoever thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know"; and soon, showing what he meant, he says: "But whoever loves God is known by him." He did not wish to say "has known him", but by saying "is known by him" he wished to commend more expressly that this too is from him, that we love him. For "the love of God is poured out in our hearts," not by ourselves, but "through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us." And one must love God little who thinks he has been made good not by him but by himself. And how can such a person glory not in himself but in the Lord? For whoever glories that he is good ought to glory in him by whom he was made good; and so whoever thinks he was made good by himself will consequently glory in himself, not in the Lord. But the whole aim of the grace of the New Testament, by which we have our heart on high, since "every best gift and every perfect gift is from above," works to this end, that we may not be ungrateful; and in the very giving of thanks nothing else is done but that "he who glories may glory in the Lord." You have a book, long indeed, but, I think, not superfluous. But love also to read the writings of the church, and you will not find many things to ask of me; but by reading and pondering, if you also pray purely to God, the giver of all good things, you will learn thoroughly all things worth knowing, or at least most of them, by his inspiration rather than by any human being's admonition. And yet, by the very fact that we approve with unerring judgment one who admonishes us well from outside, what else do we testify than that we have the inner light as our teacher?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 8:2–3; Rom 5:5; Jas 1:17; 1 Cor 1:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 140.85 (CSEL 44:233–235; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/140-68/#p-140-85).

## Letter 141.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-1
- Source: CSEL 44:235–236
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A council of Catholic bishops (written by Augustine) warns the Donatist laity that their bishops' claim that the judge at the Conference of Carthage was bribed comes from men caught lying in their own mandate.

### Latin text

Cum in auribus nostris fama crebresceret hoc uobis uestros episcopos dicere, cognitorem praemio fuisse corruptum, ut contra eos sententia proferretur, uos autem ista facile credere ac propterea multos uestrum adhuc nolle adquiescere ueritati, placuit nobis cogente domini caritate ex concilio nostro haec ad uos scripta dirigere, quibus primitus admoneremini illos uobis uictos atque conuictos haec mendacia iactare. qui etiam in suo mandato, quod pro ipsa conlatione fecerunt et suis nominibus atque subscriptionibus firmauerunt nos illic traditores et persecutores suos esse dicentes, in falsitate atque mendacio manifestissimo detecti atque conuicti sunt, ita ut uolentes gloriari de multitudine coepiscoporum suorum inter aliquorum absentium nomina etiam mortui nomen insererent et, cum quaereretur, ubi esset, subita perturbatione caecati ipsi eum confiterentur in itinere defecisse. et cum interrogarentur, quo modo potuerit apud Carthaginem subscribere, si in itinere iam defecerat, uehementius perturbati alio mendacio se obligauerunt respondentes eum a Carthagine redeuntem fuisse defunctum; de quo mendacio exire omnino minime potuerunt. ecce quibus creditis uel de antiqua traditione uel de cognitoris corruptione, qui mandatum suum, ubi nobis obiecerunt crimen traditionis, non potuerunt conscribere sine crimine falsitatis. proinde, quae maxime necessaria credidimus, his litteris tamquam breuiario collecta inseruimus, ne forte ad magna gestorum uolumina uel peruenire non facile possitis uel ea legere laboriosum putetis.

### English translation (Claude)

Since the report kept growing louder in our ears that your bishops are telling you that the judge who heard the case was bribed to give sentence against them, and that you readily believe this, and that for this reason many of you still refuse to assent to the truth, it has seemed good to us, compelled by the love of the Lord, to send you this letter from our council. In it we first warn you that these falsehoods are being spread among you by men who were defeated and refuted. In the very mandate they drew up for the conference and confirmed with their names and signatures, calling us traitors and their persecutors, they were caught and refuted in a most manifest falsehood and lie: wishing to boast of the great number of their fellow bishops, they inserted among the names of some who were absent the name of a dead man as well; and when it was asked where he was, blinded by sudden confusion, they themselves admitted that he had died on the journey. And when they were asked how he could have signed at Carthage if he had already died on the journey, still more confused, they entangled themselves in another lie, answering that he had died on his way back from Carthage; and from that lie they could find no way out at all. See whom you believe, whether about the old “handing over” or about the judge’s being bribed: men who could not write out their own mandate, in which they charged us with the crime of handing over the Scriptures, without committing the crime of forgery. We have therefore gathered into this letter, as into a summary, what we believed most necessary, in case you cannot easily get hold of the great volumes of the proceedings or think it too laborious to read them.

### Translation notes

- This letter is the synodal letter of the Catholic Council of Zerta (Cirta) of 412, addressed to the Donatists and drafted by Augustine. The address, which names the bishops of the council, is not printed in the staged text.
- “Handing over” (traditio): the surrender of the Scriptures during the persecution of Diocletian, the charge on which the Donatist schism was founded.
- The judge (cognitor) was the tribune Marcellinus, who presided at the Conference of Carthage in 411.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.1 (CSEL 44:235–236; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-1).

## Letter 141.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-2
- Source: CSEL 44:236–237
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The letter describes the careful arrangements of the Conference of Carthage: equal delegations, guardians of the record, notaries on both sides, and signatures to every statement.

### Latin text

Carthaginem uenimus et nos et episcopi uestri et, quod prius nolebant et indignum esse dicebant, in unum conuenimus. electi sunt ex nobis et ex ipsis septem hinc et septem inde, qui pro causa omnium loquerentur. electi sunt alii septem hinc et septem inde, cum quibus, ubi opus erat, consilium pertractarent. electi sunt quattuor hinc et quattuor inde, qui gestis conscribendis custodes essent, ne infalsatum aliquid ab aliquo diceretur. dati sunt etiam a nobis et ab ipsis notarii quattuor hinc et quattuor inde, ut bini cum exceptoribus iudicis alternarent, ne aliquis nostrum se dixisse aliquid causaretur, quod non fuisset exceptum. huic tantae diligentiae etiam illud est additum, ut et nos et ipsi quem ad modum ipse iudex uerbis nostris subscriberemus, ne quisquam diceret in illis gestis aliquid uel postea fuisse corruptum. cum enim adhuc uiuentibus eis, qui subscripserunt, innotuerint eadem gesta omnibus locis, in quibus oportet ut innotescant, sic etiam ad posteros confirmata ueritas perdurabit. nolite ergo esse ingrati tantae misericordiae dei, quae per istam diligentiam uobis ministrata est; nulla excusatio iam remansit; nimium dura, nimium diabolica corda sunt hominum, quae adhuc tantae manifestationi ueritatis obsistunt.

### English translation (Claude)

We came to Carthage, both we and your bishops, and we met together in one place, which they had previously refused and called unworthy. Seven were chosen from us and seven from them to speak on behalf of all. Another seven were chosen on each side for them to consult with whenever necessary. Four were chosen on each side to act as guardians over the writing of the proceedings, so that no one could say that anything had been falsified by anyone. Four notaries were also supplied on each side, by us and by them, to work in turns, two at a time, with the judge’s stenographers, so that none of us could claim to have said something that had not been taken down. To all this care was added the further step that both we and they, as the judge himself did, should sign our own words, so that no one could say that anything in those proceedings had been corrupted afterward. For since those same proceedings have been made known, while those who signed them are still living, in all the places where they ought to be made known, the truth thus confirmed will endure for posterity as well. Do not, then, be ungrateful for so great a mercy of God, which has been supplied to you through this care. No excuse is left now; too hard, too devilish are the hearts of men who still resist so plain a manifestation of the truth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.2 (CSEL 44:236–237; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-2).

## Letter 141.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-3
- Source: CSEL 44:237–238
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatist delegates tried to keep the case from being heard at all, which shows they knew their cause was bad.

### Latin text

Ecce episcopi partis uestrae, quos omnes elegerunt, ut pro omnibus loquerentur, conati sunt, quantum potuerunt, ut omnino ipsa causa non ageretur, propter quam tantus numerus episcoporum utriusque partis de uniuersa Africa et de tam longinquis locis Carthaginem uenerat. et cum omnis anima suspensa expectaret, in tanta collectione quid ageretur, illi uehementer instabant, ut nihil ageretur. qua re hoc, nisi quia causam suam malam sciebant et facillime se posse uinci, si ageretur, dubitare non poterant? ipse ergo animus eorum, quo timebant, ne causa ageretur, iam uictos eos esse monstrabat. si enim extorquerent, quod uolebant, ut iam conlatio ipsa non fieret, nec disputationibus nostris ueritas appareret, redeuntes a Carthagine quid uobis erant responsuri? quid demonstraturi? credo, prolaturi erant gesta et dicturi uobis: Nos instabamus, ut causa non ageretur, illi instabant, ut ageretur. uos expectatis uidere, quid egerimus; ecce legite, ubi eos uicimus, ut nihil ageremus. forte et uos responderetis, si cor haberetis: Nihil ergo acturi ut quid istis? uel potius, qui nihil egistis, ut quid redistis?

### English translation (Claude)

See: the bishops of your party, whom all of them chose to speak for all, tried as hard as they could to prevent the very case from being heard at all, the case for which so great a number of bishops of both parties had come to Carthage from all Africa and from such distant places. And while every soul waited in suspense to see what would be done in so great an assembly, they insisted vehemently that nothing be done. Why, unless they knew their case was bad and could not doubt that they would very easily be defeated if it were heard? Their very state of mind, in which they feared that the case would be heard, already showed them defeated. For if they had wrung out what they wanted, so that the conference itself did not take place and the truth did not appear through our arguments, what were they going to answer you on their return from Carthage? What would they have shown you? I suppose they would have produced the proceedings and said to you: “We insisted that the case not be heard; they insisted that it be heard. You are waiting to see what we did: here, read how we beat them, so that we did nothing.” Perhaps you too, if you had any sense, would have answered: “If you were going to do nothing, why go there?” or rather: “Since you did nothing, why have you come back?”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.3 (CSEL 44:237–238; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-3).

## Letter 141.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-4
- Source: CSEL 44:238
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: At the conference the Donatists admitted they had nothing to say against the Catholic Church spread through the world, as Scripture describes it.

### Latin text

Denique posteaquam non potuerunt efficere, quod conati sunt, id est ut causa non ageretur, ipsa actio demonstrauit, quid timuerint, quando in omnibus uicti sunt. confessi sunt enim contra ecclesiam catholicam, quae toto terrarum orbe diffunditur, nihil se habere, quod dicerent, quia diuinis sanctarum scripturarum testimoniis oppressi sunt, quibus ecclesia designatur incipiens ab Hierusalem creuisse per loca, in quibus apostoli praedicauerunt et nomina eorundem locorum in suis epistulis et actis conscripserunt, et inde diffundi per ceteras gentes. contra istam ecclesiam se non habere causam manifesta uoce professi sunt, ubi est euidentissima in nomine dei nostra uictoria. cum enim confirmant ecclesiam, cui nos communicare ipsos autem non communicare manifestum est, olim se uictos esse testantur et uobis, si sapiatis, apertissime indicant, quid dimittere et quid tenere debeatis non in ea falsitate, qua uobis non cessant adhuc usque mentiri, sed in illa ueritate, quam uicti coacti sunt confiteri.

### English translation (Claude)

Then, after they could not achieve what they attempted, that is, to keep the case from being heard, the hearing itself showed what they had feared, when they were defeated on every point. For they admitted that they had nothing to say against the Catholic Church, which is spread throughout the whole world, because they were overwhelmed by the divine testimonies of the holy Scriptures, in which the Church is described as beginning from Jerusalem and growing through the places where the apostles preached and whose names they wrote down in their letters and Acts, and from there spreading through the other nations. Against this Church they declared with a plain voice that they had no case; and here, in the name of God, our victory is most evident. For when they affirm the Church with which it is manifest that we are in communion and they are not, they testify that they were defeated long ago, and they show you most openly, if you have any wisdom, what you ought to give up and what you ought to hold, not in the falsehood with which they never cease lying to you even now, but in the truth which, once defeated, they were compelled to confess.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:47: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 1:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Church beginning from Jerusalem and spreading to the nations alludes to Luke 24:47 and Acts 1:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.4 (CSEL 44:238; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-4).

## Letter 141.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-5
- Source: CSEL 44:238–239
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Separation from the Catholic Church forfeits life, while within it no one is defiled by others' sins except by consenting to their deeds.

### Latin text

Quisquis ergo ab hac catholica ecclesia fuerit separatus, quantum libet laudabiliter se uiuere existimet, hoc solo scelere, quod a Christi unitate disiunctus est, non habebit uitam, sed ira dei manet super eum. quisquis autem in hac ecclesia bene uixerit, nihil ei praeiudicant aliena peccata, quia unusquisque in ea proprium onus portabit, sicut apostolus dicit. et quicumque in ea corpus Christi manducauerit indigne, iudicium sibi manducat et bibit; nam etiam hoc ipse apostolus scripsit. cum autem dicit iudicium sibi manducat, satis ostendit, quia non alteri iudicium manducat sed sibi. hoc nos egimus et ostendimus et obtinuimus, quia communio malorum non maculat aliquem participatione sacramentorum sed consensione factorum. nam si in factis malis non eis quisque consentiat, portat malus causam suam et personam suam nec praeiudicat alteri, quem in consensione mali operis socium non habet criminis.

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever, therefore, has been separated from this Catholic Church, however praiseworthy he may think his life to be, will not have life for this crime alone, that he is cut off from the unity of Christ; but the wrath of God remains on him. But whoever lives well in this Church is not prejudiced by the sins of others, because in it each one will bear his own burden, as the apostle says. And whoever in it eats the body of Christ unworthily eats and drinks judgment on himself; for this too the same apostle wrote. When he says “eats judgment on himself,” he shows clearly enough that he eats judgment not for another but for himself. This is what we argued and showed and established: that communion with the wicked does not stain anyone by sharing in the sacraments but by consenting to their deeds. For if a man does not consent to the wicked in their evil deeds, the wicked man bears his own cause and his own person and does not prejudice another whom he does not have as an accomplice in the crime by consent to the evil work.

### Scripture references

- John 3:36: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “The wrath of God remains on him”: John 3:36. “Each will bear his own burden”: Gal 6:5. “Eats and drinks judgment on himself”: 1 Cor 11:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.5 (CSEL 44:238–239; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-5).

## Letter 141.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-6
- Source: CSEL 44:239–241
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: When the Maximianist schism was raised, the Donatists themselves declared that 'neither case prejudices case nor person person,' which concedes the Catholic argument about Caecilian.

### Latin text

Hoc etiam ipsi uoce apertissima coacti sunt confiteri non tunc, quando ista dicebamus, sed postea, cum aliud ageretur. nam cum uentum fuisset ad causam etiam Caeciliani, quam nos ab ecclesiae causa distinguebamus, ut, si forte malus esset inuentus, ipsum anathemaremus, non tamen propter ipsum ecclesiam Christi relinqueremus, cui per malam suam causam praeiudicare non posset, — cum ergo etiam ad ipsam Caeciliani causam uentum fuisset et legissent illi concilium Carthaginense, ubi recitabant septuaginta plus minus episcoporum sententias contra Caecilianum absentem prolatas. respondimus eis sic non obesse illud episcoporum concilium absenti Caeciliano, quem ad modum non obfuit plurium episcoporum partis Donati concilium absenti Primiano, quando eum in Maximiani causa plus minus centum episcopi damnauerant. tunc illi nominata causa Maximiani, unde sciunt se etiam, quos damnauerant, in honore integro suscepisse et baptismum in sacrilego Maximiani schismate datum se confirmasse et non destruxisse et in sua Bagaitana sententia, qua eos damnauerunt, quibusdam, qui in ipso schismate fuerunt, dilationem dedisse et dixisse, quod eos non polluerint sacrilegi surculi Maximiani plantaria, — ista ergo causa posteaquam eorum aures percussit, expauescentes et perturbati et obliti, unde superius contra nos contendebant, continuo dixerunt: Nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat et confirmauerunt uerbis suis, quod nos antea de ecclesia dicebamus, quia non solum catholicae transmarinae, contra quam se confessi sunt non habere, quod dicerent, uerum etiam catholicae Africanae, quae illi unitatis communione coniungitur, causa et persona Caeciliani, qualiscumque fuisset, praeiudicare non posset, si Maximianus, qui cum ceteris sociis suis Primianum damnauit, si etiam Felicianus, qui simul Primianum damnauit et postea in causa Primiani a Donati parte damnatus est, non praeiudicat parti Donati, cui modo episcopus, sicut antea fuerat, receptus adiungitur, si etiam ipsis sociis suis Maximianus non praeiudicat, quibus isti dilationem dederunt dicentes eos ab illo, cum quo fuerunt, non fuisse pollutos, quia nec causa causae praeiudicat nec persona personae.

### English translation (Claude)

This too they were compelled to confess with a most open voice, not when we were saying these things, but later, when another matter was under discussion. For the discussion had come also to the case of Caecilian, which we kept distinct from the case of the Church, so that, if he were perhaps found to be wicked, we would anathematize him, yet would not on his account abandon the Church of Christ, which he could not prejudice by his own bad case. When, then, they had come to the case of Caecilian, and they had read the Council of Carthage, in which they recited the sentences of about seventy bishops pronounced against Caecilian in his absence, we replied that this council of bishops did no harm to the absent Caecilian, just as the council of a larger number of bishops of Donatus’s party did no harm to the absent Primian, when about a hundred bishops had condemned him in the affair of Maximian. Then, when the affair of Maximian was named, from which they know that they received back with their honor intact even men whom they had condemned, that they confirmed and did not destroy baptism given in the sacrilegious schism of Maximian, and that in their sentence at Bagai, in which they condemned them, they granted a delay to some who were in that very schism, saying that the “sacrilegious shoots of Maximian’s planting” had not polluted them — after, I say, this affair struck their ears, terrified, confused, and forgetting what they had been contending against us earlier, they said at once: “Neither does case prejudice case, nor person person.” And so they confirmed in their own words what we had said before about the Church: that the case and person of Caecilian, whatever he had been, could not prejudice not only the Catholic Church overseas, against which they confessed they had nothing to say, but also the Catholic Church of Africa, which is joined to it in the communion of unity, if Maximian, who with his other associates condemned Primian, and if Felician, who joined in condemning Primian and was afterward condemned by Donatus’s party in the case of Primian, does not prejudice Donatus’s party, to which he is now attached, received as bishop as he had been before; and if Maximian does not prejudice even his own associates, to whom these men granted a delay, saying that they had not been polluted by the man with whom they had been, because neither does case prejudice case nor person person.

### Translation notes

- Caecilian was the bishop of Carthage (from ca. 311) whose ordination the Donatists rejected. Primian was the Donatist bishop of Carthage; Maximian led a schism against him within the Donatist party (393), and the Donatist Council of Bagai (394) condemned the Maximianists but later received some of them, including Felician of Musti, without rebaptizing those they had baptized.
- The quoted phrase about the “sacrilegious shoots” is from the sentence of the Council of Bagai.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.6 (CSEL 44:239–241; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-6).

## Letter 141.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-7
- Source: CSEL 44:241
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists padded the record with words, failed to prove anything against Caecilian, and could only call false the records showing that some of his judges were themselves traitors.

### Latin text

Quid ergo quaeritis amplius? multis quidem uerbis superfluis gesta onerauerunt et, quia non potuerunt efficere, ut causa non ageretur, hoc fecerunt multum loquendo, ut, quod actum est, difficile legeretur. sed debent uobis etiam ista eorum pauca uerba sufficere, ne propter nescio qua, nescio quorum hominum crimina oderitis unitatem catholicae ecclesiae, quia, sicut ipsi dixerunt, relegerunt, subscripserunt, nec causa causae praeiudicat nec persona personae. nam et in ipsa causa Caeciliani, quam licet ad ecclesiae causam non pertinentem tamen defendendam suscepimus, ut etiam ibi calumniae manifestarentur ipsorum, apertissime uicti sunt, nihil eorum, quae in Caecilianum intendebant, probare potuerunt. insuper etiam de criminibus traditionis nos episcopalia gesta protulimus. unde recitauimus aliquos eorum episcoporum, qui sententias in absentem dixerant Caecilianum, manifestissimos fuisse traditores. contra ipsa gesta illi, quia non habebant, quod dicerent, falsa esse dixerunt, sed nullo modo probare potuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

What more, then, do you seek? They loaded the proceedings with many superfluous words, and since they could not prevent the case from being heard, they managed by much talking to make what was done hard to read. But even these few words of theirs ought to be enough for you, so that you do not hate the unity of the Catholic Church because of who knows what crimes of who knows what men; for, as they themselves said, read over, and signed, neither does case prejudice case nor person person. For even in the case of Caecilian itself, which, although it does not concern the case of the Church, we nevertheless undertook to defend, so that their slanders might be exposed there too, they were most plainly defeated; they could prove none of the charges they brought against Caecilian. Moreover, we produced episcopal records concerning the crimes of handing over, from which we read out that some of the very bishops who had pronounced sentence against the absent Caecilian were most manifest traitors. Against these records they, having nothing to say, said that they were false, but they could in no way prove it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.7 (CSEL 44:241; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-7).

## Letter 141.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-8
- Source: CSEL 44:241–242
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' own forefathers accused Caecilian before Constantine, so they cannot blame Catholics for appealing to emperors; and Caecilian was in fact cleared by bishops and by the emperor.

### Latin text

Insuper etiam confessi sunt uel potius pro magna gloria professi sunt Caecilianum apud Constantinum imperatorem a suis praecessoribus accusatum et addiderunt mendacium, quod illis accusantibus fuerit ab imperatore damnatus. ecce et hinc uicti sunt, unde uobis solent nebulas erroris offundere concitantes nobis inuidiam et in odium uestrum nos adducentes, quia ecclesiae causam apud imperatores agimus. ecce maiores eorum, de quorum nominibus gloriantur, ecclesiae causam egerunt apud imperatorem, persecuti sunt accusando Caecilianum apud imperatorem, damnatum dixerunt. iam non uos inducant uanissimis et mendacissimis uerbis; redite ad cor uestrum, timete dominum, cogitate ueritatem, relinquite falsitatem. quicquid enim iam passi fueritis imperialibus legibus, quod non pro iustitia sed pro iniquitate patimini, non poteritis dicere ideo nos esse iniustos, quia sic uobiscum agi non debuit, ut imperator uos ab ista iniquitate compesceret. episcopi enim uestri confessi sunt maiores suos sic egisse cum Caeciliano, quo modo uobiscum agi non uultis. et tamen, quod Caecilianum apud imperatorem persecuti fuerint, etiam ipsis confitentibus et profitentibus satis constitit; quod autem Caecilianus fuerit ab imperatore damnatus, omnino non constitit; immo etiam constitit eum accusantibus et persequentibus maioribus eorum et bis numero prius ab episcopis et ab ipso postea imperatore fuisse purgatum. hoc etiam ipsi confirmauerunt talia postea quasi pro causa sua proferendo, ut magis contra ipsos esse inuenirentur et pro causa Caeciliani etiam illa, quae protulerunt, recitarentur. quoscumque ergo accusare uoluerunt, nullis certis documentis probare potuerunt; quicquid autem nos et pro ecclesiae causa et pro Caeciliani causa diximus, et uerbis suis et lectionibus a se prolatis etiam ipsi confirmauerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Moreover, they also admitted, or rather proclaimed as a great glory, that Caecilian was accused before the emperor Constantine by their predecessors, and they added the lie that on their accusation he was condemned by the emperor. See, here too they were defeated, on the very point on which they usually pour clouds of error over you, stirring up ill will against us and bringing us into your hatred because we plead the cause of the Church before the emperors. See, their forefathers, whose names they glory in, pleaded the cause of the Church before the emperor; they prosecuted Caecilian by accusing him before the emperor; they said he was condemned. Let them no longer lead you astray with the emptiest and most lying words; return to your heart, fear the Lord, think on the truth, abandon falsehood. For whatever you may now suffer under the imperial laws, since you suffer it not for righteousness but for iniquity, you will not be able to say that we are unjust because you ought not to have been treated in such a way that the emperor restrains you from this iniquity. For your bishops confessed that their forefathers dealt with Caecilian in the way you do not wish to be dealt with. And yet, that they prosecuted Caecilian before the emperor was well established, even by their own admission and proclamation; but that Caecilian was condemned by the emperor was not established at all. On the contrary, it was established that, when their forefathers accused and prosecuted him, he was cleared twice, first by bishops and afterward by the emperor himself. This too they confirmed by later producing such things as if for their own case, so that they were found to be rather against themselves, and even what they produced was read out in favor of Caecilian’s case. Whomever they wished to accuse, they could prove nothing by any sure documents; but whatever we said, both for the cause of the Church and for the cause of Caecilian, they themselves confirmed both by their own words and by the readings they produced.

### Scripture references

- Isa 46:8: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The passage defends the use of imperial laws against the Donatists; it is translated as written.
- “Return to your heart” echoes Isa 46:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.8 (CSEL 44:241–242; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-8).

## Letter 141.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-9
- Source: CSEL 44:242–243
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The documents the Donatists produced (Optatus's book, their forefathers' petition, Constantine's letter to Verinus) all showed that Caecilian had been cleared.

### Latin text

Nam protulerunt primo codicem Optati, unde quasi probarent Caecilianum ab imperatore damnatum. qui codex cum contra illos legeretur et magis ostenderet Caecilianum fuisse purgatum, ab omnibus risi sunt. sed quia ipse risus non potuit ab exceptoribus excipi, uerbis suis apud acta risos se esse testati sunt. iterum protulerunt et recitauerunt libellum imperatori Constantino a suis maioribus datum, ubi questi sunt, quod eos memoratus imperator grauiter persequeretur, ac sic eodem libello manifestarunt se apud imperatorem a Caeciliano fuisse superatos falsumque esse, quod dixerunt, eum ab imperatore damnatum. tertio protulerunt litteras eiusdem Constantini ad uicarium Verinum datas, ubi eos grauiter detestatur et propterea dicit de exilio relaxandos et furori suo dimittendos, quia iam deus in illos coeperat uindicare, ac sic etiam istis imperatoris litteris confirmarunt falsum se dixisse, quod Caecilianus ab imperatore damnatus sit, cum potius imperator ipsos a Caeciliano uictos esse monstrauerit, quando eos uehementer execratus ideo iussit, ut de exilio dimitterentur, ut deo iudice, sicut etiam coeperant, punirentur.

### English translation (Claude)

For first they produced the book of Optatus, to prove, as it were, that Caecilian was condemned by the emperor. When this book was read against them and rather showed that Caecilian had been cleared, they were laughed at by everyone. And since the laughter itself could not be taken down by the stenographers, they testified in their own words in the record that they had been laughed at. Again they produced and read a petition presented to the emperor Constantine by their forefathers, in which they complained that the emperor was persecuting them severely; and so by this same petition they made it plain that they had been defeated by Caecilian before the emperor, and that what they had said, that he was condemned by the emperor, was false. Thirdly they produced a letter of the same Constantine addressed to the vicar Verinus, in which he expresses strong detestation of them and says that they are therefore to be released from exile and left to their own madness, because God had already begun to take vengeance on them. And so by this letter of the emperor too they confirmed that they had spoken falsely in saying that Caecilian was condemned by the emperor, since the emperor rather showed that they had been defeated by Caecilian, when, cursing them vehemently, he ordered them to be released from exile for this reason, that they might be punished with God as judge, as they had already begun to be.

### Translation notes

- The “book of Optatus” is Optatus of Milevis's work against the Donatist Parmenian. Verinus was vicar of Africa in 321.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.9 (CSEL 44:242–243; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-9).

## Letter 141.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-10
- Source: CSEL 44:243–244
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Constantine's letter about Ingentius, produced by the Donatists, actually confirms that Felix of Abthugni, Caecilian's ordainer, was found innocent.

### Latin text

Postea Felicis Aptungensis, ordinatoris Caeciliani, in medium causam miserunt dicentes eundem Felicem fuisse traditorem, a quo Caecilianus fuerat ordinatus, et eiusdem Constantini imperatoris pro Caeciliano contra se ipsos litteras protulerunt, ubi ad proconsulem scripsit, ut ad comitatum suum mitteretur Ingentius. iste autem Ingentius confessus fuerat in cognitione Aeliani proconsulis falsum se fecisse aduersus Felicem, Caeciliani ordinatorem. dicebant ergo isti non sine causa uoluisse imperatorem, ut ad se mitteretur Ingentius, nisi quia Caeciliani adhuc causa pendebat, et conabantur inmittere suspicionem uanissimam, quod, posteaquam Ingentius ad comitatum directus est, tunc imperator contra Caecilianum praetulerit iudicare et illud iudicium suum, quod nos recitaueramus, ubi inter partes cognouerat Caecilianumque purgauerat, sententia posteriore rescindere. sed dicebatur eis, ut hoc potius legerent, et nihil omnino proferebant. illae autem litterae imperatoris, quibus ad se mitti iussit Ingentium, quas contra se ipsos pro Caeciliano recitauerunt, hoc continent, quod Aelianus pro consule in causa Felicis audientiam praebuerit competentem eundemque Felicem a crimine traditionis innocentem fuisse constiterit; sed Ingentium ad comitatum suum propterea iubere transmitti, ut illis, qui ibi erant et diurnis diebus eum interpellare non desinebant, apparere et intimare posset et frustra eos Caeciliano inuidiam comparare et aduersus eum uiolenter insurgere uoluisse.

### English translation (Claude)

Afterward they brought into the discussion the case of Felix of Abthugni, who ordained Caecilian, saying that this Felix, by whom Caecilian had been ordained, was a traitor; and they produced a letter of the same emperor Constantine, for Caecilian and against themselves, in which he wrote to the proconsul that Ingentius should be sent to his court. Now this Ingentius had confessed in the hearing before the proconsul Aelianus that he had committed forgery against Felix, the ordainer of Caecilian. These men said, then, that the emperor would not have wanted Ingentius sent to him without reason, unless Caecilian’s case was still pending; and they tried to insinuate the emptiest suspicion, that after Ingentius was sent to the court, the emperor then chose to judge against Caecilian and to rescind by a later sentence that judgment of his, which we had read, in which he had heard the parties and cleared Caecilian. But they were told to read that instead, and they produced nothing at all. That letter of the emperor ordering Ingentius to be sent to him, which they read against themselves for Caecilian, contains this: that the proconsul Aelianus gave a proper hearing in the case of Felix, and that this same Felix was established to be innocent of the crime of handing over; but that he ordered Ingentius to be sent to his court so that he might appear before those who were there and did not cease petitioning him day after day, and inform them that they had wished in vain to stir up ill will against Caecilian and to rise violently against him.

### Translation notes

- Felix of Abthugni (Aptunga) was cleared by the proconsul Aelianus in 315 after Ingentius confessed to forging evidence against him.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.10 (CSEL 44:243–244; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-10).

## Letter 141.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-11
- Source: CSEL 44:244–245
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The dates in the record show that Caecilian was cleared by bishops, then Felix by the proconsul, and long afterward Caecilian again by the emperor, so the Donatist claim of a reversal is false.

### Latin text

Quis eos crederet contra se ista recitasse pro nobis, nisi dei omnipotentis nutu factum esset, ut non solum uerba eorum gestis tenerentur, sed etiam manus subscribentium legerentur? nam et ordinem consulum et dierum, qui gestis expressus est, si quis nunc diligenter aduertat, inueniet primo Caecilianum episcopali iudicio fuisse purgatum. deinde non multo post Felicis Aptungensis causa ab Aeliano proconsule examinata est, ubi eum constitit innocentem. in qua causa ad comitatum mitti iussus Ingentius et longe postea ipse imperator causam inter partes cognouit atque finiuit. in qua cognitione Caecilianum innocentem illos autem calumniosissimos iudicauit. in quo ordine consulum et dierum satis ostenditur fallaciter eos et calumniose dixisse, quod imperator misso ad comitatum Ingentio iudicium suum mutauit et Caecilianum, quem prius purgauerat, postea condemnauit. non solum autem nihil de hac re legere potuerunt et contra se ipsos tanta legerunt, sed etiam per ordinem consulum euidentius conuincuntur post causam Felicis proconsulari iudicio terminatam, in qua iussum est, ut ad comitatum Ingentius mitteretur, nec paruo interuallo sed longe postea memorati imperatoris iudicio inter partes habito Caecilianum fuisse purgatum.

### English translation (Claude)

Who would believe that they read these things for us against themselves, unless it had been brought about by the will of almighty God, so that not only their words were held in the record but even the hands of those who signed could be read? For if anyone now carefully notes the order of consuls and days expressed in the record, he will find that Caecilian was first cleared by the judgment of bishops; then, not long afterward, the case of Felix of Abthugni was examined by the proconsul Aelianus, in which he was established to be innocent, and in this case Ingentius was ordered to be sent to the court; and long afterward the emperor himself heard the case between the parties and settled it. In that hearing he judged Caecilian innocent and them most slanderous. This order of consuls and days shows sufficiently that they spoke deceitfully and slanderously in saying that the emperor, after Ingentius was sent to the court, changed his judgment and afterward condemned Caecilian whom he had earlier cleared. Not only could they read nothing on this point, while reading so much against themselves, but they are refuted still more clearly by the order of consuls: after the case of Felix had been concluded by the proconsul’s judgment, in which Ingentius was ordered to be sent to the court, Caecilian was cleared by the judgment of the emperor held between the parties, and not after a short interval but long afterward.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.11 (CSEL 44:244–245; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-11).

## Letter 141.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-12
- Source: CSEL 44:245–246
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The charge of bribery is absurd, since the Donatists themselves read out four documents in Caecilian's favor.

### Latin text

Non ergo uobis dicant, quia praemio corrupimus iudicem. quid enim aliud solent uicti homines dicere? aut si aliquid dedimus iudici, ut contra illos pro nobis pronuntiaret, ipsis quid dedimus, ut contra se pro nobis tanta non solum dicerent, uerum etiam recitarent? an forte uolunt, ut eis apud uos gratias agamus, quia, cum dicant iudicem praemio a nobis esse corruptum, ipsi tamen multa, quae pro nobis contra se ipsos dixerunt et recitauerunt, gratis nobis omnia praestiterunt? aut certe, si propterea dicunt, quod nos uicerint, quia melius egerunt causam Caeciliani quam nos, hoc plane credite illis; nos enim duas lectiones pro illo sufficere putaueramus, illi autem quattuor protulerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

So let them not tell you that we bribed the judge. What else do defeated men usually say? Or if we gave the judge something to pronounce for us against them, what did we give them, that they not only said but even read out so much against themselves for us? Or perhaps they want us to thank them before you, because, while they say that the judge was bribed by us, they themselves supplied us with everything they said and read for us against themselves free of charge? Or surely, if they say they defeated us because they pleaded Caecilian’s case better than we did, believe them in this, by all means: for we had thought two readings were enough for him, but they produced four.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.12 (CSEL 44:245–246; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-12).

## Letter 141.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-13
- Source: CSEL 44:246–247
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The council urges the Donatists to read the proceedings and return to unity, where their sacraments will become profitable to them; dated 14 June 412.

### Latin text

Sed quid pluribus litteras oneremus? si uultis nobis credere, credite et teneamus pariter unitatem, quam iubet et diligit deus. si autem nobis non uultis credere, gesta ipsa legite aut, uobis ut legantur, admittite et, an uera sint, quae scripsimus, ipsi uobis probate. si autem nihil horum facere uultis et manifestissima ueritate conuictam partis Donati falsitatem adhuc sequi desideratis, mundi sumus a poena uestra, quando uos sero postea paenitebit. si uero id, quod uobis praestitit deus, non contempseritis et post causam tam diligenter actam et tam diligenter manifestatam peruersam consuetudinem relinquentes paci Christi et unitati consenseritis, de uestra correctione gaudebimus et sacramenta Christi, quae in sacrilegio schismatis ad iudicium habetis, utilia et salubria nobis erunt, cum in catholica pace habueritis caput Christum, ubi caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum. Haec ad uos scripsimus XVIII Kal. Iulias piissimo Honorio Augusto VIIII cons., ut, quando possunt, ad quosque uestrum istae litterae peruenirent.

### English translation (Claude)

But why should we load the letter with more? If you are willing to believe us, believe, and let us hold together the unity that God commands and loves. If you are not willing to believe us, read the proceedings themselves, or allow them to be read to you, and test for yourselves whether what we have written is true. But if you are unwilling to do any of these things and still wish to follow the falsehood of Donatus’s party, refuted by the most manifest truth, we are clean of your punishment, when you repent too late afterward. But if you do not despise what God has given you, and after a case so carefully conducted and so carefully made public you abandon a perverse habit and consent to the peace and unity of Christ, we shall rejoice at your correction; and the sacraments of Christ, which you have to your judgment in the sacrilege of schism, will be useful and wholesome to you, when in the Catholic peace you have Christ as head, where love covers a multitude of sins. We wrote this to you on the eighteenth day before the Kalends of July, in the ninth consulship of the most pious Honorius Augustus, so that this letter might reach each of you as soon as possible.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The date is 14 June 412.
- The staged text reads nobis (“useful to us”); the sense requires “to you” (uobis), and it is so translated.
- “Love covers a multitude of sins”: 1 Pet 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 141.13 (CSEL 44:246–247; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-141-13).

## Letter 142.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-1
- Source: CSEL 44:247–248
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reassures a group of clergy and laity recently reconciled from Donatism that, though he is absent, they are together with him in the one body of Christ, the Church spread through the world.

### Latin text

Laetificauit nos uester aduentus, sed non uos absentia nostra contristet. in illa enim ecclesia sumus, quae propitio deo, licet usquequaque porrecta et toto orbe diffusa sit, unum tamen corpus est magnum unius capitis magni, quod caput eius est ipse saluator, sicut apostolus dicit. de huius autem capitis glorificatione, quae post eius resurrectionem futura fuerat, tanto ante propheta praedixit: Exaltare super caelos, deus, et, quia illo super caelos exaltato ecclesia eius omnem terram copiosa fecunditate fuerat impletura, consequenter idem psalmus adiunxit: Et super omnem terram gloria tua. proinde, dilectissimi, stabili mente et firmissimo corde sub tam excelso capite in tam glorioso corpore persistamus, in quo inuicem membra sumus. unde, etiam si remotissimis terris mea longinqua esset absentia, in illo simul essemus, a cuius corporis unitate recedere non debemus. si enim nos una domus haberet, utique simul esse diceremur; quanto magis simul sumus, cum in uno corpore simul sumus! quamquam etiam in una domo nos esse ueritas ipsa testatur, quoniam sancta scriptura, quae corpus Christi esse dicit ecclesiam, ipsa itidem dicit eandem ecclesiam esse domum dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Your coming gladdened us; but do not let our absence sadden you. For we are in that Church which, by God’s favor, although it is stretched out everywhere and spread through the whole world, is nevertheless one great body of one great head, and that head is the Savior himself, as the apostle says. Of the glorification of this head, which was to come after his resurrection, the prophet foretold so long before: “Be exalted above the heavens, O God”; and because, when he had been exalted above the heavens, his Church was to fill the whole earth with abundant fruitfulness, the same psalm went on to add: “And your glory over all the earth.” Therefore, dearly beloved, let us persevere with steady mind and most firm heart under so exalted a head in so glorious a body, in which we are members of one another. So even if my absence took me far off into the most distant lands, we would be together in him, from the unity of whose body we must not withdraw. For if one house held us, we would certainly be said to be together; how much more are we together when we are together in one body! And yet the truth itself testifies that we are in one house too, since the holy Scripture, which says that the Church is the body of Christ, likewise says that this same Church is the house of God.

### Scripture references

- Ps 57:5 (56:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:18: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 12:5: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 3:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The addressees, named in the manuscripts as clergy and people (of uncertain place) who had come over from the Donatists, are not named in the staged text; the letter is dated ca. 412.
- “Be exalted above the heavens, O God, and your glory over all the earth”: Ps 57:5, 11 (LXX 56:6, 12). Christ as head of the body: Col 1:18; Eph 1:22–23; members of one another: Rom 12:5; the Church as the house of God: 1 Tim 3:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 142.1 (CSEL 44:247–248; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-1).

## Letter 142.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-2
- Source: CSEL 44:248
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Psalm 96, titled for the house built after the captivity, shows that the Church, God's house, is built throughout the whole earth.

### Latin text

Sed haec domus non orbis terrae uno angulo aedificatur sed per omnem terram. unde ille psalmus, in cuius titulo legitur: Quando domus aedificabatur post captiuitatem, sic incipit: Cantate domino canticum nouum, cantate domino, omnis terra. in uetustate quippe ueteris hominis orbem terrae diabolus captiuauerat; post hanc captiuitatem cum aedificatur domus, renouatio fidelium significatur in homine nouo. unde dicit apostolus: Exuite uos ueterem hominem et induite nouum, qui secundum deum creatus est. et quia hoc per omnem terram fit in unitate catholica, sicut in alio psalmo dictum est: Et super omnem terram gloria tua, sic in isto, cum dictum esset: Cantate domino canticum nouum, ut demonstraretur, quando domus aedificatur in isto cantico nouo, continuo subiunctum est: Cantate domino, omnis terra. operarios autem, per quos ista tam magna domus aedificatur, idem psalmus exhortatur, cum consequenter dicit: Bene nuntiate de die ex die salutare eius; adnuntiate in gentibus gloriam eius, in omnibus populis mirabilia eius. et paulo post dicit: Adferte domino, patriae gentium, adferte domino gloriam et honorem.

### English translation (Claude)

But this house is built not in one corner of the world but throughout the whole earth. That is why the psalm whose title reads “When the house was being built after the captivity” begins thus: “Sing to the Lord a new song; sing to the Lord, all the earth.” For in the oldness of the old man the devil had taken the world captive; when the house is built after this captivity, the renewal of the faithful in the new man is meant. That is why the apostle says: “Put off the old man and put on the new, who has been created according to God.” And because this takes place throughout the whole earth in Catholic unity, just as it was said in another psalm, “And your glory over all the earth,” so in this one, after it had been said, “Sing to the Lord a new song,” in order to show where the house is built in this new song, there was added at once: “Sing to the Lord, all the earth.” And the workmen through whom this great house is built are exhorted by the same psalm when it goes on to say: “Proclaim well his salvation from day to day; announce his glory among the nations, his wonders among all peoples.” And a little later it says: “Bring to the Lord, you families of the nations, bring to the Lord glory and honor.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 96:2 (95:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 96:7 (95:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:22: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 57:11 (56:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Psalm 96 (LXX 95) bears in the Greek and Latin the title “When the house was being built after the captivity”; it is quoted (vv. 1–3, 7) from the Latin. “Put off the old man …”: Eph 4:22–24 (cf. Col 3:9–10).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 142.2 (CSEL 44:248; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-2).

## Letter 142.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-3
- Source: CSEL 44:248–249
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists admitted they had no case against the Church overseas; within the Church no one is defiled by others' sins, and the chaff must be borne on the threshing floor until the judgment.

### Latin text

His atque huius modi testimoniis tantae huius domus, quae in tota scriptura tam multa reperiuntur, ita cesserunt inimici eius, ut faterentur contra ecclesiam transmarinam, quam tamen catholicam esse confessi sunt, causa............ huic nos communicamus........................................ mereamur membris Christi et compaginem corporis eius fidelissimae caritatis amplectamur affectu, quoniam in ecclesiae huius unitate quicumque male uiuit, sibi iudicium manducat et bibit, sicut apostolus dicit, quicumque autem bene uiuit, non ei praeiudicat aliena causa et aliena persona, sicut etiam illi, cum de causa Maximiani urguerentur, ore suo coacti sunt confiteri, quia nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat. solliciti tamen inuicem sumus pro nobis tamquam unius corporis membra, ut, quicumque adiuuante domino ad horreum futurum pertinemus, interim in area simul paleas toleremus nec propter illam futuro igni destinatam nos aream dominicam deseramus.

### English translation (Claude)

To these and similar testimonies to this great house, which are found in such numbers throughout Scripture, its enemies so yielded that they admitted that against the Church overseas, which they nevertheless confessed to be Catholic, they had no case … with this we are in communion … that we may be worthy … the members of Christ, and let us embrace the framework of his body with the affection of most faithful love; for in the unity of this Church whoever lives wickedly eats and drinks judgment on himself, as the apostle says, but whoever lives well is not prejudiced by another’s case and another’s person, as even they, when they were pressed about the case of Maximian, were compelled to confess with their own mouth: that neither does case prejudice case nor person person. Yet we are anxious for one another as members of one body, so that all of us who by the Lord’s help belong to the future barn may meanwhile bear the chaff together on the threshing floor, and not, because of the chaff destined for the coming fire, desert the Lord’s threshing floor.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The manuscript is damaged here; the edition marks two gaps, shown as “…”, and the words between them are translated as they stand.
- “Eats and drinks judgment on himself”: 1 Cor 11:29. The threshing floor, chaff, and barn: Matt 3:12. On the Maximianist argument, see Letter 141.6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 142.3 (CSEL 44:248–249; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-3).

## Letter 142.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-4
- Source: CSEL 44:249–250
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the clergy to fulfill their offices faithfully and to pray for those still estranged, that God may draw them to the sweetness of unity.

### Latin text

Agite fideliter et hilariter ecclesiastica officia, quae ad uos pertinent pro gradibus uestris, et ministerium uestrum sinceriter adimplete propter illum deum, sub quo conserui sumus et cui rationem de nostris actibus reddituros nos esse cogitamus. unde abundare debent in nobis misericordiae uiscera, quia iudicium sine misericordia erit illi, qui non fecit misericordiam. ac per hoc et pro illis orate nobiscum, qui adhuc contristantur.................... habet carnalis animi infirmitas ut diuturna consuetudine collecta atque contracta. nam quis non intellegat, quam bonum sit et iucundum fratres habitantes in unum, si sanas fauces ista iucunditas tangat, unde respuat amaritudinem diuisionis mens, quae diligit dulcedinem caritatis? potens est autem et misericors deus, quem pro illis oramus, ut quibuslibet occasionibus etiam ipsos adtrahat ad salutem. dominus uos in pace conseruet.

### English translation (Claude)

Carry out faithfully and cheerfully the church duties that belong to you according to your ranks, and fulfill your ministry sincerely for the sake of that God under whom we are fellow servants, and to whom we reflect that we shall give account of our deeds. Hence the bowels of mercy ought to abound in us, because judgment without mercy will be for him who has shown no mercy. And for this reason pray with us also for those who are still saddened … the weakness of a carnal mind has, as something gathered and drawn together by long habit. For who would not understand how good and pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in unity, if this pleasantness touched a healthy palate, so that the mind that loves the sweetness of love would spit out the bitterness of division? But God is powerful and merciful, and we pray to him for them, that by whatever occasions he may draw them also to salvation. May the Lord keep you in peace.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 133:1 (132:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- A gap in the manuscript is marked in the edition and shown as “…”.
- “Judgment without mercy”: Jas 2:13. “How good and pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in unity”: Ps 133:1 (LXX 132:1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 142.4 (CSEL 44:249–250; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/141-1/#p-142-4).

## Letter 143.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-1
- Source: CSEL 44:250–251
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Marcellinus's question how Pharaoh's magicians found water to turn into blood: perhaps sea water, or more likely water from the Israelites' region, which the plagues spared.

### Latin text

Epistulam tuam, quam per sanctum fratrem et coepiscopum meum Bonifatium accepi, quaesiui, cum rescriberem, nec inueni. recolui tamen te in ea quaesisse, quo modo inuenerint magi Pharaonis conuersa in sanguinem tota aqua Aegypti, unde simile aliquid facerent. quae duobus modis quaestio solui solet, siue cum marina aqua offerri potuerit, siue, quod est credibilius, quia in ea regione, in qua erant filii Israhel, istae plagae non fiebant. hoc enim quibusdam scripturae illius locis apertissime expressum admonet, etiam ubi non dictum est, quid intellegi debeat.

### English translation (Claude)

When I came to answer your letter, which I received through my holy brother and fellow bishop Boniface, I looked for it and could not find it. I remembered, however, that in it you asked how Pharaoh’s magicians found water with which to do something similar when all the water of Egypt had been turned into blood. The question is usually solved in two ways: either that sea water could have been brought to them, or, which is more credible, that these plagues did not occur in the region where the children of Israel were. For this is very plainly stated in some places of that Scripture, and it shows what ought to be understood even where it is not said.

### Scripture references

- Exod 7:22: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 8:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 9:26: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to the tribune Marcellinus (412); the address is not printed in the staged text.
- Exod 7:20–22; the plagues sparing the land of Goshen: Exod 8:22; 9:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.1 (CSEL 44:250–251; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-1).

## Letter 143.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-2
- Source: CSEL 44:251–252
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that his own books, unlike Scripture, may contain errors; he writes as he progresses and plans a work correcting whatever in them displeases him.

### Latin text

Illae autem litterae tuae, quas presbyter Urbanus adtulit, habent quaestionem mihi propositam ex libris non diuinis sed meis, quos scripsi de libero arbitrio. in talibus autem quaestionibus non multum laboro, quia, etsi defendi sententia mea liquida ratione non potest, mea est, non eius auctoris, cuius sensum inprobare fas non est, etiam cum eo non intellecto hoc inde sentitur, quod inprobandum est. ego proinde fateor me ex eorum numero esse conari, qui proficiendo scribunt et scribendo proficiunt. unde si aliquid uel incautius uel indoctius a me positum est, quod non solum ab aliis, qui uidere id possunt, merito reprehendatur uerum etiam a me ipso, quia et ego saltem postea uidere debeo, si proficio, nec mirandum est nec dolendum sed potius ignoscendum atque gratulandum, non quia erratum est, sed quia inprobatum. nam nimis peruerse se ipsum amat, qui et alios uult errare, ut error suus lateat. quanto enim melius et utilius, ubi ipse errauit, alii non errent, quorum admonitu errore careat! quod si noluerit, saltem comites erroris non habeat. si enim mihi deus, quod uolo, praestiterit, ut omnium librorum meorum quaecumque mihi rectissime displicent, opere aliquo ad hoc ipsum instituto colligam atque demonstrem, tunc uidebunt homines, quam non sim acceptor personae meae.

### English translation (Claude)

That other letter of yours, which the presbyter Urbanus brought, contains a question put to me not from the divine books but from my own, which I wrote on free choice. In questions of this kind I do not trouble myself much, because, even if my opinion cannot be defended by clear reasoning, it is mine, not that of the Author whose meaning it is not lawful to reject, even when, through failure to understand him, something is taken from him that ought to be rejected. I confess, therefore, that I try to be one of those who write as they progress and progress as they write. Hence, if I have set down anything either too carelessly or too ignorantly, which deserves to be criticized not only by others who can see it but also by myself (because I too ought at least to see it afterward, if I am making progress), this is neither to be wondered at nor grieved over, but rather pardoned and welcomed with congratulation: not because there was an error, but because it was disowned. For a man loves himself too perversely if he wants others to err too, so that his own error may stay hidden. How much better and more useful it is that where he himself erred others should not err, and that by their warning he may be free of error! And if he will not be, at least let him have no companions in his error. For if God grants me what I wish, that I may gather and point out, in a work set up for this very purpose, whatever in all my books quite rightly displeases me, then people will see how far I am from being partial to myself.

### Translation notes

- The books On Free Choice (De libero arbitrio). The planned work of self-correction became the Retractations (427).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.2 (CSEL 44:251–252; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-2).

## Letter 143.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-3
- Source: CSEL 44:252–253
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects friends' claims that he never erred: Cicero's praise of a man who never said anything he wished to recall fits a fool, or else the inspired writers, not himself.

### Latin text

Vos autem, qui me multum diligitis, si talem adseritis aduersus eos, quorum malitia uel inperitia uel intellegentia reprehendor, ut me nusquam scriptorum meorum errasse dicatis, frustra laboratis, non bonam causam suscepistis, facile in ea me ipso iudice superamini, quoniam non mihi placet, cum a carissimis meis talis esse existimor, qualis non sum. profecto enim non me sed pro me alium sub meo nomine diligunt, si non quod sum, sed quod non sum, diligunt. nam in quantum me nouerunt uel de me uerum credunt, ego ab eis diligor; in quantum autem mihi tribuunt, quod in me nec agnoscunt nec uerum est, non ab eis ego sed nescio quis alter diligitur. ac per hoc, si iam saltem illud meum nosti, cum aliquid humiliter de me ipso dico, non me fallaciter dicere. ego non sum talis, qualem conlaudant. Romani maximus auctor Tullius eloquii: Nullum umquam uerbum, inquit, reuocare uellet, emisit. quae quidem laus quamuis praeclarissima uideatur, tamen credibilior est de nimium fatuo quam de sapiente perfecto. nam et illi, quos uulgo moriones uocant, quanto magis a sensu communi dissonant magisque absurdi et insulsi sunt, tanto magis nullum uerbum emittunt, quod reuocare uelint, quia dicti mali uel stulti uel incommodi paenitere utique cordatorum est. sed si in bonam partem accipiatur, ut quempiam talem fuisse credamus, qui cum sapienter omnia loqueretur, nullum umquam uerbum, quod reuocare uellet, emisit, hoc potius de hominibus dei, qui spiritu sancto acti locuti sunt, quam de illo, quem sic Cicero laudat, saluberrima pietate credendum est. ab hac ego excellentia tam longe absum, ut, si nullum uerbum, quod reuocare uellem, protulero, fatuo sim quam sapienti similior. illius quippe scripta summa sunt auctoritate dignissima, qui nullum uerbum, non quod reuocare uellet, sed quod reuocare deberet, emisit. hoc quisquis nondum est adsecutus, secundas habeat partes modestiae, quia primas non potuit habere sapientiae; quia non ualuit omnia non paenitenda diligenter dixisse, paeniteat, quae cognouerit dicenda non fuisse.

### English translation (Claude)

But you who love me greatly, if, against those by whose malice or lack of skill or understanding I am criticized, you maintain that I have nowhere erred in my writings, you labor in vain; you have taken up a bad cause, and in it you are easily defeated, with me myself as judge, since it does not please me to be thought by my dearest friends to be what I am not. For surely they love not me but someone else in my place under my name, if they love not what I am but what I am not. For in so far as they know me or believe what is true about me, I am loved by them; but in so far as they attribute to me what they neither recognize in me nor is true, it is not I who am loved by them but some other person. And so, if you at least know this much of me, that when I say something humble about myself I do not say it deceitfully: I am not such as they praise. Tullius, the greatest master of Roman eloquence, says of someone: “He never uttered a word that he would wish to recall.” This praise, though it seems most splendid, is nevertheless more credible of a complete fool than of a perfect wise man. For those whom people commonly call simpletons, the more they are out of tune with common sense and the more absurd and witless they are, the less they utter any word they would wish to recall, since to regret a bad or foolish or unfitting word belongs to people of sense. But if it is taken in a good sense, so that we believe someone was such that, since he spoke everything wisely, he never uttered a word he would wish to recall, this is rather to be believed, with most wholesome piety, of the men of God who spoke moved by the Holy Spirit, than of the man Cicero praises in this way. I am so far from this excellence that, if I have uttered no word I would wish to recall, I would be more like a fool than a wise man. For that man’s writings are most worthy of the highest authority who has uttered no word, I do not say that he would wish to recall, but that he ought to recall. Whoever has not yet attained this, let him take the second part, that of modesty, since he could not have the first, that of wisdom; since he was not able to say everything carefully so that nothing need be regretted, let him regret what he has learned ought not to have been said.

### Scripture references

- 2 Pet 1:21: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Lig. (Cicero): quotation, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The staged text of the quotation lacks quod (“that”) before reuocare, which the sense and Augustine’s repetition of it in 143.4 require; it is translated with it.
- The saying is Cicero’s, of Caesar (Pro Ligario 10.30 is commonly cited; the exact source is uncertain). “Men of God who spoke moved by the Holy Spirit”: 2 Pet 1:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.3 (CSEL 44:252–253; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-3).

## Letter 143.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-4
- Source: CSEL 44:253–255
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Mindful of Horace's line that a spoken word cannot be recalled, Augustine delays publishing his books on Genesis and on the Trinity to reduce their faults.

### Latin text

Cum ergo non, sicut quidam carissimi mei putant, nulla uel pauca sed potius plura fortasse, quam etiam maledici opinantur, uerba dixerim, quae mallem reuocare, si possem, non mihi Tulliana illa blanditur, qua dictum est: Nullum umquam uerbum, quod reuocare uellet, emisit, sed angit me plane Horatiana sententia: Nescit uox missa reuerti. hinc est, quod periculosissimarum quaestionum libros de genesi scilicet et de trinitate diutius teneo, quam uultis et fertis, ut, si non potuerint nisi habere aliqua, quae merito reprehendantur, saltem pauciora sint, quam esse possent, si praecipiti festinatione inconsultius ederentur. uos enim, ut uestrae indicant litterae — nam hoc mihi etiam sanctus frater et coepiscopus meus scripsit Florentius —, ideo, ut edantur, urgetis, quo possint a me, dum in hac carne uiuo, defendi, cum uel ab inimicis mordentibus uel etiam ab amicis parum intellegentibus fortasse in quibusdam coeperint accusari. quod utique propterea dicitis, quia non putatis esse in eis aliquid, quod uera possit ratione culpari; alioquin non me ad eorum editionem sed ad diligentiorem emendationem potius hortaremini. ego autem iudices ueros et ueritate seueros magis intueor, inter quos et me ipsum primitus constituere uolo, ut ad illos ea tantum reprehendenda perueniant, quae a me quamuis sedulo perscrutante uideri minime potuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, the words I have spoken that I would rather recall, if I could, are not none or few, as some of my dearest friends think, but perhaps more than even my detractors suppose, I am not flattered by that saying of Tullius, “He never uttered a word that he would wish to recall,” but I am plainly troubled by the saying of Horace: “A word once sent forth cannot return.” That is why I keep the books on the most dangerous questions, namely those on Genesis and on the Trinity, longer than you wish and can bear, so that, if they cannot help containing some things deserving criticism, there may at least be fewer than there could be if they were published too hastily in headlong haste. For you, as your letters indicate (and my holy brother and fellow bishop Florentius has also written this to me), urge me to publish them so that I can defend them while I live in this flesh, if they begin to be attacked on some points, either by biting enemies or even by friends of little understanding. You say this, of course, because you do not think there is anything in them that can be faulted on true grounds; otherwise you would urge me not to publish them but rather to correct them more carefully. But I look rather to true judges, severe for the sake of truth, among whom I wish first to place myself, so that only those faults may come to them for criticism that I could not see at all, however carefully I examined them.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Horace, Ars 390 (Horace): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Lig. (Cicero): quotation, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Horace, Ars poetica 390. The books are The Literal Meaning of Genesis and On the Trinity, both then unfinished.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.4 (CSEL 44:253–255; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-4).

## Letter 143.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-5
- Source: CSEL 44:255
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that a sentence in On Free Choice 3 about the soul ruling its body 'after sin' was worded so as not to decide among the four views of the soul's origin.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, hoc tamen, quod in tertio libro de libero arbitrio, cum de substantia rationali agerem, sic a me positum est, ut dicerem: In corporibus autem inferioribus post peccatum ordinata regit corpus suum non omni modo pro arbitrio, sed sicut leges uniuersitatis sinunt, diligenter aduertant, qui putant me aliquid de anima humana uelut certum statuisse atque fixisse, quod uel ex parentibus per propaginem ueniat uel in actibus uitae superioris atque caelestis peccauerit, ut corruptibili carne mereretur includi, et uideant sic a me uerba fuisse perpensa, ut retento eo, quod certum habeo, post peccatum primi hominis natos esse atque nasci ceteros homines in carne peccati, cui sanandae uenit in domino similitudo carnis peccati, ita omnia sonarent, ut nulli praeiudicarent opinioni quattuor illarum, quas postea digessi atque distinxi non confirmans aliquam sed interim, quod agebam, sequestrata illarum discussione determinans, ut, quaecumque illarum uera esset, deus sine dubio laudaretur.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, consider what I set down in the third book On Free Choice, when I was treating of rational substance, saying: “In the lower bodies, after sin, it is set in order and rules its body, not in every way as it wills, but as the laws of the universe allow.” Let those who think that I laid down and fixed something as certain about the human soul, whether that it comes from the parents by propagation or that it sinned in the acts of a higher and heavenly life so that it deserved to be shut up in corruptible flesh, note this carefully. And let them see that I weighed my words so that, while keeping what I hold as certain, that after the sin of the first man all other men were born and are born in the flesh of sin, for whose healing the likeness of sinful flesh came in the Lord, everything was so worded as to prejudge none of the four opinions which I afterward set out and distinguished. I did not affirm any of them, but, setting their discussion aside for the time, I settled what I was treating, so that, whichever of them was true, God would without doubt be praised.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotation is from On Free Choice 3.11.34. The four opinions (set out in On Free Choice 3.20.56–21.59) are: all souls propagated from Adam’s; each created new for each body; created elsewhere and sent by God; or sinking into bodies of their own accord.
- “Likeness of sinful flesh”: Rom 8:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.5 (CSEL 44:255; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-5).

## Letter 143.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-6
- Source: CSEL 44:255–257
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever the origin of souls, the soul now rules its body imperfectly 'after sin,' whether its own or Adam's; even infants are born in the flesh of sin and need baptism.

### Latin text

Siue enim ex illa una omnes animae propagentur siue singillatim in singulis fiant siue extra creatae mittantur siue in corpora sponte mergantur, procul dubio creatura ista rationalis, id est humanae animae natura in corporibus inferioribus, hoc est terrenis post peccatum ordinata regit corpus suum non omni modo pro arbitrio interim, quod constat peccatum primi hominis. non enim dictum est: Post peccatum suum aut: Posteaquam peccauit, sed dictum est: <Post peccatum, ut, quodlibet postea, si fieri posset, discussa ratio declararet siue peccatum eius siue peccatum parentis carnis eius, recte dictum intellegeretur, quod dictum est: <Post peccatum in inferioribus corporibus ordinata regit corpus suum non omni modo pro arbitrio, quia et caro concupiscit aduersus spiritum et ingemescimus grauati et corpus, quod corrumpitur, adgrauat animam et — quis omnia enarret carnalis infirmitatis incommoda? quae utique non erunt, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita. tunc itaque spiritale corpus reget omni modo pro arbitrio. nunc uero non omni modo sed sicut leges uniuersitatis sinunt, per quas constitutum est, ut corpora orta occidant et aucta senescant. nam illius primi hominis anima ante peccatum etiamsi nondum spiritale corpus sed animale tamen pro arbitrio regebat. post peccatum autem, id est posteaquam peccatum in illa carne commissum esset, ex qua deinceps propagaretur caro peccati, anima rationalis sic est in inferioribus corporibus ordinata, ut non omni modo pro arbitrio regat corpus suum. quod si nondum adquiescunt in paruulis, qui nulla adhuc peccata propria commiserunt, iam tamen carnem esse peccati, quia et huic sanandae, cum baptizantur, necessaria est medicina similitudo illa carnis peccati, nec sic istis uerbis nostris habent quod suscenseant. constat quippe, nisi fallor, eandem carnem, etiamsi non uitio sed natura infirma est, tamen post peccatum coepisse nasci, quia neque ita creatus est Adam neque aliquem genuit ante peccatum.

### English translation (Claude)

For whether all souls are propagated from that one soul, or are made individually in individuals, or are created outside and sent in, or sink into bodies of their own accord, without doubt this rational creature, that is, the nature of the human soul, in the lower bodies, that is, earthly ones, after sin is set in order and rules its body not in every way as it wills; meanwhile the sin of the first man is established. For it was not said “after its own sin” or “after it sinned,” but “after sin,” so that, whatever reason might later make clear after discussion, if that were possible, whether it was its own sin or the sin of the parent of its flesh, what was said would be rightly understood: “After sin, in the lower bodies, it is set in order and rules its body not in every way as it wills.” For the flesh lusts against the spirit, and we groan, being burdened, and the body that is corrupted weighs down the soul, and — who could recount all the troubles of fleshly weakness? These will certainly not exist when this corruptible has put on incorruption, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life. Then, therefore, it will rule a spiritual body in every way as it wills; but now not in every way, but as the laws of the universe allow, by which it has been established that bodies that have arisen perish, and those that have grown grow old. For the soul of that first man before sin, although it ruled a body not yet spiritual but natural, nevertheless ruled it as it willed. But after sin, that is, after sin had been committed in that flesh from which the flesh of sin was afterward to be propagated, the rational soul has been so set in order in the lower bodies that it does not rule its body in every way as it wills. If some do not yet accept that in little children, who have as yet committed no sins of their own, there is nevertheless already flesh of sin, because for healing this too, when they are baptized, that medicine, the likeness of sinful flesh, is necessary, even so they have nothing in these words of mine to be angry about. For it is certain, unless I am mistaken, that this same flesh, even if it is weak not by fault but by nature, nevertheless began to be born after sin, because Adam was not created so, nor did he beget anyone before sin.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “The flesh lusts against the spirit”: Gal 5:17. “We groan, being burdened”: 2 Cor 5:4. “The body that is corrupted weighs down the soul”: Wis 9:15. “This corruptible … incorruption”: 1 Cor 15:53–54; “swallowed up by life”: 2 Cor 5:4. Spiritual and natural body: 1 Cor 15:44.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.6 (CSEL 44:255–257; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-6).

## Letter 143.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-7
- Source: CSEL 44:257–258
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds the soul immortal and created but admits uncertainty about its origin, inviting correction by sure reason or clear Scripture, which can never truly conflict.

### Latin text

Quaerant ergo alia, quae recte reprehendant, non solum in aliis festinantius editis uerum etiam in his ipsis libris meis de libero arbitrio. neque enim eos inuenturos nego, unde mihi et beneficium conferant, quoniam, si illi, quod iam in multorum manus exierunt, corrigi non possunt, ego certe, quod uiuo adhuc, possum. haec autem uerba tam caute a me posita, ut nulli de animae exortu quattuor illarum opinioni rationiue praescriberem, hi tantum reprehendant, qui reprehendendam putant eandem ipsam de re tam obscura cunctationem meam. contra quos me non defendo, quod recte faciam in hac quaestione cunctari, cum omnino non dubitem et inmortalem esse animam non ita ut deus, qui solus habet inmortalitatem, sed modo quodam sui generis et eam esse creaturam, non substantiam creatoris et si quid aliud de natura eius certissimus teneo. sed quia hoc me facere compellit de animae exortu caliginosissimae quaestionis obscuritas, manum potius porrigant confitenti et, quicquid illud est, nosse cupienti et doceant, si possunt, uel ostendant, si quid de hac re uel certa ratione didicerunt uel apertissimo diuino eloquio crediderunt. si enim ratio contra diuinarum scripturarum auctoritatem redditur, quamlibet acuta sit, fallit ueri similitudine; nam uera esse non potest. rursus si manifestissimae certaeque rationi uelut scripturarum sanctarum obicitur auctoritas, non intellegit, qui hoc facit, et non scripturarum illarum sensum, ad quem penetrare non potuit, sed suum potius obicit ueritati, nec quod in eis, sed quod in se ipso uelut pro eis inuenit, opponit.

### English translation (Claude)

Let them look, then, for other things to criticize rightly, not only in other works published more hastily but even in these very books of mine On Free Choice. For I do not deny that they will find things by which they will even do me a kindness: since those books, because they have already gone out into many hands, cannot be corrected, but I certainly can be, since I am still alive. But these words, set down by me so cautiously that I prescribed none of those four opinions or arguments about the origin of the soul, let only those criticize who think that my very hesitation in so obscure a matter deserves criticism. Against them I do not defend myself by arguing that I am right to hesitate in this question, since I have no doubt at all that the soul is immortal (not as God is, who alone has immortality, but in a certain way of its own kind), and that it is a creature, not the substance of the Creator, and whatever else I hold most certainly about its nature. But since the obscurity of this most murky question of the soul’s origin compels me to do this, let them rather stretch out a hand to one who confesses and desires to know whatever the truth is, and let them teach, if they can, or show, whatever they have learned on this matter by sure reasoning or believed from the clearest divine utterance. For if reasoning is brought against the authority of the divine Scriptures, however acute it may be, it deceives by a likeness to truth; for it cannot be true. Again, if the authority of the holy Scriptures is set, as it were, against the clearest and most certain reasoning, the one who does this does not understand; he sets against the truth not the meaning of those Scriptures, into which he has not been able to penetrate, but rather his own, and opposes not what he has found in them but what he has found in himself as though for them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Who alone has immortality”: 1 Tim 6:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.7 (CSEL 44:257–258; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-7).

## Letter 143.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-8
- Source: CSEL 44:258–259
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine illustrates with Ecclesiastes 12:7 how a traducianist could read 'dust to earth, spirit to God who gave it' as implying that souls, like flesh, descend from Adam.

### Latin text

Exempli gratia diligenter adtende quod dicam. scriptum est prope finem libri, qui uocatur ecclesiastes, cum de solutione hominis, quae fit per mortem istam, qua dirimitur anima a corpore, scriptura loqueretur: Et conuertatur puluis in terram, sicut fuit, et spiritus reuertatur ad deum, qui dedit eum. sententia huius auctoritatis procul dubio certa est nec quemquam decipit falsitate; sed si quispiam uoluerit eam sic interpretari, ut inde animarum propaginem, quod ex una illa, quam deus primo homini dedit, omnes ceterae ueniant, conetur adstruere, uidetur illi suffragari, quod ibi de carne dictum est pulueris nomine — nam utique puluis et spiritus nihil aliud hoc loco quam caro et anima intellegitur —, ut eo modo adfirmet animam reuerti ad deum, quod sit de traduce illius animae, quam primo homini dedit deus, quem ad modum conuertitur caro in terram, cum sit etiam ipsa de traduce illius carnis, quae in primo homine de terra facta est, ac sic contendat ex hoc, quod de carne notissimum est, debere nos credere illud, quod de anima occultum est. de traduce quippe carnis non ambigitur, sed de animae ambigitur. utrumque autem ita positum est in hoc testimonio, uelut singula singulis parili ratione reddantur, caro scilicet conuertatur in terram, sicut fuit — inde enim sumpta est, quando factus est primus homo —, et spiritus reuertatur ad deum, qui dedit eum, quando insufflauit in faciem hominis, quem finxerat, flatum uitae et factus est homo in animam uiuam, ut deinceps ex utraque re utriusque rei propago decurreret.

### English translation (Claude)

For example, pay careful attention to what I shall say. Near the end of the book called Ecclesiastes, where Scripture speaks of the dissolution of man that takes place through this death by which the soul is separated from the body, it is written: “And let the dust return to the earth, as it was, and the spirit return to God, who gave it.” The statement of this authority is without doubt certain and deceives no one with falsehood. But if someone wishes to interpret it so as to try to establish from it the propagation of souls, namely that all others come from that one which God gave to the first man, it seems to support him that the flesh is spoken of there under the name of dust (for here dust and spirit can only be understood as flesh and soul). Thus he may affirm that the soul returns to God because it comes by transmission from that soul which God gave to the first man, just as the flesh returns to the earth because it too comes by transmission from that flesh which in the first man was made from earth; and so he may contend that from what is most familiar about the flesh we ought to believe what is hidden about the soul. For there is no doubt about the transmission of the flesh, but there is doubt about that of the soul. Yet both are so placed in this testimony as though each were set against each on an equal footing: the flesh, namely, returns to the earth as it was (for from there it was taken when the first man was made), and the spirit returns to God who gave it, when he breathed into the face of the man whom he had formed the breath of life, and the man became a living soul, so that thereafter from each thing the propagation of each thing might run down.

### Scripture references

- Eccl 12:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eccl 12:7. God breathing the breath of life: Gen 2:7. “Transmission” renders traduce (from tradux, a vine-layer), the term for the propagation of souls (traducianism).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.8 (CSEL 44:258–259; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-8).

## Letter 143.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-9
- Source: CSEL 44:259–260
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ecclesiastes 12:7 fits traducianism or souls created beforehand and sent by God, but seems harder to square with souls created in each body or falling into bodies by choice.

### Latin text

Verum tamen, si illud est uerum, quod animas non ex illa una propagatas sed alibi creatas singulis singulas deus dat, etiam huic sententiae congruit, quod dictum est: Spiritus reuertatur ad deum, qui dedit eum. solae ergo reliquae duae opiniones uidentur excludi, quia, si fierent in singulis hominibus animae propriae, cum creantur, non putatur dici debuisse: Spiritus reuertatur ad deum, qui dedit eum, sed ad deum, qui fecit eum; dedit enim ueluti sic sonat. quasi iam extra fuerit, quod dari posset. deinde, quod dictum est: Reuertatur ad deum, urgent uerbo et premunt dicentes: Quo modo reuertetur, ubi numquam antea fuerit? potius enim dici debuisse adserunt eat ad deum uel pergat uel uadat ad deum, quam reuertatur ad deum, si numquam illic antea spiritus iste fuisse credendus est. item, quo modo animae sponte labantur in corpus, cum scriptum sit: Dedit eum, non tam in promptu est explicare. ac per hoc, ut dixi, duae istae opiniones sub uerbis huius testimonii laborant, una, qua putantur singulae quaeque animae in suis singulis corporibus fieri, alia, qua putantur in corpora sponte demergi. duabus autem illis, siue de traduce illius unius ueniant siue antea iam creatae et apud deum constitutae singulis corporibus dentur, sine labore uerba ista coaptantur.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet, if it is true that God gives to each person a soul not propagated from that one but created elsewhere, what was said also fits this opinion: “Let the spirit return to God who gave it.” So only the other two opinions seem to be excluded. For if each man’s own soul were made in him when it is created, it is thought that it should not have been said “Let the spirit return to God who gave it,” but “to God who made it”; for “gave” sounds as if what could be given already existed outside. Then, as to the words “let it return to God,” they press hard on the word and say: “How will it return where it never was before?” They maintain that it ought rather to have been said, “let it go to God,” or “proceed,” or “depart to God,” rather than “return to God,” if that spirit is not to be believed ever to have been there before. Again, how souls fall into the body of their own accord, when it is written “he gave it,” is not so easy to explain. And so, as I said, these two opinions struggle under the words of this testimony: one, by which each soul is thought to be made in its own body; the other, by which souls are thought to sink into bodies of their own accord. But to the other two, whether souls come by transmission from that one or, created beforehand and kept with God, are given to individual bodies, these words are fitted without difficulty.

### Scripture references

- Eccl 12:7: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.9 (CSEL 44:259–260; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-9).

## Letter 143.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-10
- Source: CSEL 44:260–261
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Each view of the soul's origin can answer the objection from 'God gave it'; even 'return' may mean returning to its Creator, so no view should be rashly rejected.

### Latin text

Et tamen, si assertores eius sententiae, qua creduntur animae in suis singulis corporibus fieri, adfirment ita esse dictum de spiritu, qui pro anima est positus, Meus dedit eum>, quem ad modum recte dicitur dedisse nobis oculos uel aures uel manus uel quodlibet aliud, quae membra utique non extra iam fecerat et alicubi reposita habebat, quae cum opus essent, daret, hoc est adderet et adiungeret, sed illic ea fecit in corpore, cui dedisse illa dicitur, quid ei respondeatur non uideo. nisi forte alia uel testimonia proferantur uel certa ratio, unde ista opinio refellatur. itemque illi, qui putant animas in corpora sponte defluere, sic accipiunt dictum deus dedit eum quo modo dictum est: Tradidit illos deus in concupiscentiam cordis eorum. proinde unum uerbum relinquitur, quod dictum est: Reuertatur ad deum, quo pacto accipi possit reuerti, ubi ante non fuit, si animae in suis quaeque corporibus fiunt, quo solo uerbo una illarum quattuor angustatur opinio. sed neque propter hoc unum uerbum temere existimo illam sententiam esse refutandam, ne forte possit ostendi aliquo genere locutionis, quo sancta scriptura uti solet. hoc quoque recte dici potuisse, ut reuerti intellegatur ad deum spiritus creatus tamquam ad auctorem, a quo creatus est, non tamquam ad eum, apud quem primitus fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet, if the defenders of the opinion that souls are made in their own individual bodies affirm that “God gave it” was said of the spirit, which stands for the soul, in the same way as he is rightly said to have given us eyes or ears or hands or anything else (members which he certainly had not already made outside and kept stored somewhere, to give, that is, add and attach, when they were needed, but which he made there in the body to which he is said to have given them), I do not see what answer can be given them, unless perhaps other testimonies or sure reasoning are brought forward by which this opinion may be refuted. Likewise those who think that souls slip down into bodies of their own accord take “God gave it” in the way it was said: “God gave them up to the lust of their hearts.” So only one word remains, the words “let it return to God”: how it can be understood to return where it was not before, if souls are each made in their own bodies. By this word alone one of those four opinions is hemmed in. But not even because of this one word do I think that opinion should be rashly refuted, in case it can be shown by some manner of speaking that holy Scripture usually employs that this too could rightly be said, so that the created spirit is understood to return to God as to the author by whom it was created, not as to one with whom it was at first.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 12:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “God gave them up to the lust of their hearts”: Rom 1:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.10 (CSEL 44:260–261; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-10).

## Letter 143.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-11
- Source: CSEL 44:261–262
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whoever wants to defend one view of the soul's origin must offer unambiguous Scripture or undeniable reasoning; otherwise Augustine's hesitation should not be blamed.

### Latin text

Haec ideo scripsi, ut, quisquis illarum quattuor de anima sententiarum aliquam uoluerit adstruere atque defendere, talia proferat uel de scripturis in auctoritatem ecclesiasticam receptis, quae non possint aliter accipi, sicuti est, quod deus fecit hominem, uel ratione tam certa, ut contradictio aut nulla existat aut insaniae similis merito iudicetur, uelut si quisquam dicat nec ueritatem cognoscere nec falli quemquam posse nisi uiuentem; neque enim, ut uideamus, quam sit hoc uerum; scripturarum auctoritas necessaria est ac non sensus ipse communis ita uerum esse perspicua ratione proclamat, ut, quisquis contradixerit, dementissimus habeatur. hoc si in ista obscurissima quaestione, quae de anima est, praestare aliquis potest, adiuuet inperitiam meam; quod si non potest, non culpet cunctationem meam.

### English translation (Claude)

I have written this so that whoever wishes to establish and defend any of those four opinions about the soul may bring forward either such passages from the Scriptures received into the authority of the Church as cannot be understood otherwise, as is the statement that God made man, or reasoning so certain that either no contradiction arises or it is rightly judged to be like madness, as if someone were to say that no one can know the truth or be deceived unless he is alive. For to see how true this is we do not need the authority of the Scriptures; common sense itself proclaims by evident reasoning that it is so true that whoever contradicts it would be thought utterly mad. If anyone can do this in this most obscure question about the soul, let him help my lack of skill; if he cannot, let him not blame my hesitation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.11 (CSEL 44:261–262; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-11).

## Letter 143.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-12
- Source: CSEL 44:262
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: On the virgin birth, Augustine answers that those who reject it because it happened only once should recall that secular histories record unique events they believe.

### Latin text

De uirginitate autem sanctae Mariae si hoc, quod scripsi, non persuadet fieri potuisse, neganda sunt omnia, quae mirabiliter in corporibus acciderunt. quod si propterea non creditur, quia semel factum est, quaere ab amico, quem hoc adhuc mouet, utrum nihil inueniatur in litteris saecularibus, quod et semel factum sit et tamen creditum non fabulosa uanitate! sed, sicut existimant, historica fide; quaere, obsecro te. si enim tale aliquid in illis litteris inueniri negauerit, admonendus est; si autem fassus fuerit, soluta quaestio est.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the virginity of holy Mary, if what I wrote does not convince him that it could have happened, then all the things that have happened miraculously in bodies must be denied. But if it is not believed because it happened only once, ask your friend, who is still troubled by this, whether nothing is found in secular literature that both happened only once and yet is believed, not as an idle fable but, as they think, on historical evidence. Ask him, I beg you. For if he denies that anything of the kind is found in that literature, he must be reminded; but if he admits it, the question is solved.

### Translation notes

- What Augustine had written on the virgin birth is Letter 137 to Volusian, the “friend” in question.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 143.12 (CSEL 44:262; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-143-12).

## Letter 144.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-1
- Source: CSEL 44:262–263
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the citizens of Cirta that the conversion of many of them from Donatism is God's work, not his, though he still longs to visit them.

### Latin text

Si id, quod in uestra ciuitate nos grauiter contristabat absumptum est, si duritia cordis humani resistens manifestissimae et quodam modo publicae ueritati eiusdem potentia ueritatis euicta est, si sapit dulcedo pacis unitatisque caritas non iam reuerberat oculos saucios, sed sanos inlustrat ac uegetat, non sunt haec opera nostra sed dei, non haec humanis opibus omnino tribuerem nec si, cum apud uos essemus, tanta conuersio multitudinis nobis loquentibus et hortantibus proueniret. hoc agit ille et efficit, qui per ministros suos rerum signis extrinsecus admonet, rebus autem ipsis per se ipsum intrinsecus docet. nec ideo pigrius moueri nos oportet ad uisendos uos, quoniam, quicquid in uobis laudabile factum est, non a nobis sed ab illo factum est, qui facit mirabilia solus. multo enim alacrius debemus accurrere ad spectanda opera diuina quam nostra, quia et nos, si quid boni sumus, opus illius, non hominum sumus; unde apostolus dixit: Neque qui plantat, est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus.

### English translation (Claude)

If what grieved us deeply in your city has been removed; if the hardness of the human heart, which resisted a most manifest and, so to speak, public truth, has been overcome by the power of that same truth; if the sweetness of peace is now relished, and the love of unity no longer dazzles wounded eyes but enlightens and strengthens healthy ones, these are not our works but God’s. I would not attribute them to human resources at all, not even if so great a conversion of the multitude had come about while we were with you, speaking and exhorting. He does and accomplishes this who through his ministers admonishes outwardly by the signs of things, but by the things themselves teaches inwardly through himself. Yet we ought not on that account to be more sluggish in setting out to visit you, since whatever praiseworthy thing has been done among you was done not by us but by him who alone does wonders. For we ought to hasten much more eagerly to see God’s works than our own, since we too, if we are anything good, are his work, not men’s. That is why the apostle said: “Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 72:18 (71:18 LXX): quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to the leading citizens of Cirta (Constantina) in Numidia, ca. 412; the address is not printed in the staged text.
- “Who alone does wonders”: Ps 72:18 (LXX 71:18; cf. Ps 136:4). “Neither he who plants …”: 1 Cor 3:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 144.1 (CSEL 44:262–263; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-1).

## Letter 144.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-2
- Source: CSEL 44:263–265
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even the pagan Polemo's reform by Xenocrates was God's gift, since continence comes only from God; so the Cirtans' conversion is to be credited to God, not to Augustine.

### Latin text

Xenocrates Polemonem, ut scribitis et nos ex illis litteris recordamur, de fruge temperantiae disputando non solum ebriosum uerum et tunc ebrium ad mores alios repente conuertit. quamquam ergo ille, sicut prudenter et ueraciter intellexistis, non deo fuerit adquisitus sed tantum a dominatu luxuriae liberatus, tamen ne id ipsum quidem, quod melius in eo factum est, humano operi tribuerim sed diuino. ipsius namque corporis, quod est infimum nostrum, si qua bona sunt sicut forma et uires et salus et si quid eius modi est, non sunt nisi ex deo creatore ac perfectore naturae; quanto magis animi bona donare nullus alius potest! quid enim superbius uel ingratius cogitare potest humana uecordia, si putauerit, cum carne pulchrum deus faciat hominem, animo castum ab homine fieri? hoc in libro Christianae sapientiae sic scriptum est: Cum scirem, inquit, quia nemo esse potest continens, nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae scire, cuius esset hoc donum. Polemon ergo si ex luxurioso continens factus ita sciret, cuius esset hoc donum, ut eum abiectis superstitionibus gentium pie coleret, non solum continens sed etiam ueraciter sapiens et salubriter religiosus existeret, quod ei non tantum ad praesentis uitae honestatem uerum et ad futurae inmortalitatem ualeret. quanto minus igitur mihi adrogare debeo conuersionem istam uestram uel populi uestri, quam nobis modo nuntiastis, quae me nec loquente nec saltem praesente procul dubio diuinitus facta est, in quibus ueraciter facta est! hoc itaque praecipue cognoscite, hoc pie humiliterque cogitate. deo, fratres, deo gratias agite, deum timete, ne deficiatis, amate, ut proficiatis.

### English translation (Claude)

Xenocrates, as you write and as we remember from that literature, by discussing the fruit of temperance suddenly converted Polemo, not only a drunkard but drunk at that very moment, to another way of life. Although, then, as you have understood wisely and truly, he was not won for God but only freed from the domination of self-indulgence, still I would attribute not even that improvement in him to a human work but to a divine one. For even the goods of the body itself, which is the lowest part of us, such as beauty, strength, health, and anything of this kind, come only from God, the Creator and perfecter of nature; how much more can no one else bestow the goods of the mind! For what could human folly think more proud or ungrateful than to suppose that, while God makes a man beautiful in the flesh, a man makes himself chaste in mind? In the book of Christian wisdom it is written thus: “When I knew,” he says, “that no one can be continent unless God gives it, and this too was a part of wisdom, to know whose gift this was.” If Polemo, then, when he was made continent from self-indulgent, had known whose gift this was, so as to cast off the superstitions of the nations and worship him piously, he would have become not only continent but also truly wise and savingly religious, which would have availed him not only for the honorableness of the present life but also for the immortality of the life to come. How much less, then, ought I to claim for myself this conversion of yours or of your people, which you have just announced to us, which, without my speaking or even being present, was without doubt brought about by God in those in whom it was truly brought about! Recognize this above all, then; think on this piously and humbly. To God, brothers, give thanks to God; fear God, so that you do not fall away; love him, so that you may make progress.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Polemo, a dissolute young Athenian, was converted to philosophy by a lecture of Xenocrates on temperance and later headed the Academy; the story is told by Valerius Maximus 6.9 ext. 1 and others.
- “No one can be continent unless God gives it …”: Wis 8:21, which Augustine calls a book of Christian wisdom.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 144.2 (CSEL 44:263–265; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-2).

## Letter 144.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-3
- Source: CSEL 44:265–266
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine offers the doubtful a dilemma: whether or not the Donatist case was tried overseas, separation from the worldwide Church is indefensible; he hopes to visit.

### Latin text

Si autem adhuc quosdam amor hominis occulte segregat et timor hominis fallaciter congregat, obseruent, qui tales sunt, quoniam deum, cui nuda est humana conscientia, nec testem fallunt nec iudicem fugiunt. si quid autem illos de quaestione ipsius unitatis pro suae salutis sollicitudine permouet, hoc sibi, quantum existimo, iustissimum extorqueant, ut de catholica ecclesia, id est toto orbe diffusa, id potius credant, quod scripturae diuinae dicunt, non quod linguae humanae maledicunt. de ipsa uero dissensione, quae inter homines orta est — qui quales libet fuerint, non utique praeiudicant promissis dei, qui dixit ad Abraham: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes, quod creditum est, cum audiretur praedictum, et negatur, cum uidetur impletum —, hoc tamen interim breuissimum et, nisi fallor, inuictissimum cogitent, aut actam esse istam causam in ecclesiastico transmarino iudicio aut non esse actam; si acta ibi non est, innocens est Christi societas per omnes transmarinas gentes, cuius societatis nos communione gaudemus, et ideo ab eis innocentibus utique sacrilega diremptione separantur; si uero acta ibi est ista causa, quis non intellegat, quis non sentiat, quis non uideat eos in ea uictos, quorum inde communio separata est? eligant ergo, utrum malint credere, quod pronuntiauerunt ecclesiastici cognitores an quod murmurant uicti litigatores. aduersus istam complexionem dictu breuissimam, intellectu facillimam adtendite diligenter pro uestra prudentia quam nihil sobrium responderi possit; et tamen malus Polemon magis ebrietate.............. inueterati erroris euertitur. Date ueniam prolixiori fortassis epistulae quam iucundiori uerum tamen, ut arbitror, utiliori quam blandiori, domini honorabiles et merito suscipiendi, carissimi ac desiderantissimi fratres. de aduentu autem ad uos nostro utrorumque desiderium deus impleat. quanto enim caritatis ardore accendamur ad uisendos uos, uerbis explicare non possumus, sed uos benigne credere minime dubitamus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if love of a man still secretly keeps some apart, and fear of a man deceitfully brings them together, let such people note that they neither deceive God, to whom the human conscience lies bare, as witness, nor escape him as judge. And if anything about the question of unity itself still troubles them, out of concern for their salvation, let them, as I think, extract this most just demand from themselves: that about the Catholic Church, that is, the Church spread through the whole world, they believe rather what the divine Scriptures say than what human tongues slander. As for the dissension itself that arose among men (and whatever they were like, they certainly do not prejudice the promises of God, who said to Abraham, “In your seed all nations shall be blessed,” which was believed when it was heard foretold, and is denied when it is seen fulfilled), let them meanwhile consider this very brief and, unless I am mistaken, most unanswerable argument: either this case was tried in the Church’s court overseas, or it was not. If it was not tried there, the fellowship of Christ throughout all the nations overseas, in whose communion we rejoice, is innocent, and therefore those who separate themselves from these innocent people do so by a sacrilegious division. But if this case was tried there, who does not understand, who does not perceive, who does not see that they were defeated in it whose communion was separated from there? Let them choose, then, whether they would rather believe what the Church’s judges pronounced or what the defeated litigants mutter. Consider carefully, in your wisdom, how nothing sober can be answered against this dilemma, so very brief to state and so very easy to understand. And yet Polemo was more easily turned from drunkenness … of inveterate error. Pardon a letter perhaps more long than pleasant, yet, as I think, more useful than flattering, honorable lords, justly to be welcomed, dearest and most longed-for brothers. As for our coming to you, may God fulfill the desire of us both. For with what ardor of love we are kindled to see you we cannot express in words; but we have no doubt that you kindly believe it.

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The manuscript has a gap after “drunkenness,” marked in the edition and shown as “…”; the sense is evidently that Polemo was more easily turned from drunkenness than these men from the madness of inveterate error. The staged malus is translated by that sense.
- “In your seed all nations shall be blessed”: Gen 22:18 (cf. Gen 12:3).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 144.3 (CSEL 44:265–266; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/143-1/#p-144-3).

## Letter 145.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-1
- Source: CSEL 44:266–267
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Anastasius by the hands of Lupicinus and Concordialis, apologizing for his long delay in replying.

### Latin text

Salutandi sinceritatem tuam fidissima occurrit occasio honorabilium seruorum dei, fratrum nostrorum Lupicini et Concordialis, per quos, etiam si non scriberem, posset caritas tua omnia, quae apud nos aguntur, addiscere. scio enim, quantum nos in Christo diligas, quia et tu scis, quantum in illo uicissim diligaris a nobis, et ideo non dubitaui te contristari potuisse, si eos uidisses sine litteris meis, quos a nobis profectos et tanta nobis familiaritate coniunctos ignorare non posses, simul etiam quia rescriptorum debitor fui. nam ex quo sumpsi epistulam tuam, nisi nunc primum rescripsisse me nescio; tantis enim curis obstricti et distenti sumus, ut etiam hoc nesciam.

### English translation (Claude)

A most trustworthy opportunity for greeting Your Sincerity has presented itself in the honorable servants of God, our brothers Lupicinus and Concordialis, through whom Your Charity could learn everything that is going on among us even if I did not write. For I know how much you love us in Christ, since you also know how much in him you are loved by us in return; and therefore I did not doubt that you could have been saddened if you had seen without a letter from me those whom you could not fail to know had set out from us and were joined to us by such intimacy; and also because I owed you a reply. For since I received your letter, I do not know whether I am not replying now for the first time; we are bound and stretched by so many cares that I do not know even this.

### Translation notes

- The addressee is Anastasius (ca. 412–413); the address is not printed in the staged text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.1 (CSEL 44:266–267; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-1).

## Letter 145.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-2
- Source: CSEL 44:267–268
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reflects that the world is more dangerous when it allures than when it troubles, and that the will is not truly free without God's grace.

### Latin text

Vobis autem quem ad modum sit et utrum uobis aliquam requiem, quantum in hac terra potest, dominus praestiterit, ualde nosse cupimus, quoniam, si glorificatur unum membrum, congaudent omnia membra atque ita plerumque contingit, ut, dum aliquos fratres nostros in quantulacumque requie constitutos in mediis nostris anxietatibus cogitamus, non parua ex parte recreemur, tamquam et nos in ipsis quietius tranquilliusque uiuamus. quamuis etiam cum molestiae in huius uitae fragilitate crebrescunt, aeternam requiem nos desiderare compellunt. mundus quippe iste periculosior est blandus quam molestus et magis cauendus, cum se inlicit diligi, quam cum admonet cogitque contemni. nam cum omnia, quae in illo sunt, concupiscentia sint carnis et concupiscentia oculorum et ambitio saeculi, saepe etiam his, qui talibus spiritalia, inuisibilia, aeterna praeponunt, inserit se terrenae suauitatis affectus et delectationibus suis nostra comitatur officia. quanto enim sunt caritati futura meliora, tanto sunt infirmitati uiolentiora praesentia. et utinam hi, qui ea uidere et gemere nouerunt, uincere et euadere mereantur! quod sine dei gratia nullo modo uoluntas implet humana, quia nec libera dicenda est, quam diu est uincentibus et uincientibus cupiditatibus subdita; a quo enim quis deuictus est, huic et seruus addictus est, et: Si uos filius liberauerit, ait ipse dei filius, tunc uere liberi eritis.

### English translation (Claude)

We very much wish to know how things are with you, and whether the Lord has granted you some rest, as far as it is possible in this land; for if one member is glorified, all the members rejoice with it. And so it often happens that, when in the midst of our anxieties we think of some of our brothers established in however little rest, we are refreshed in no small measure, as if we too lived more quietly and peacefully in them. Yet even when troubles grow more frequent in the frailty of this life, they compel us to desire eternal rest. For this world is more dangerous when it flatters than when it troubles, and more to be guarded against when it entices us to love it than when it warns and compels us to despise it. For since all that is in it is the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the ambition of the world, the affection for earthly sweetness often insinuates itself even into those who prefer to such things what is spiritual, invisible, and eternal, and accompanies our duties with its delights. For the better the things to come are to love, the more violent the present things are to weakness. And would that those who know how to see and lament them might deserve to overcome and escape them! This the human will in no way accomplishes without the grace of God; for it should not even be called free so long as it is subject to the desires that conquer and bind it. For by what a man is overcome, to that he is also bound as a slave; and “If the Son sets you free,” says the Son of God himself, “then you will be free indeed.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 12:26: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:16: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Pet 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- John 8:36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “If one member is glorified …”: 1 Cor 12:26. “The lust of the flesh …”: 1 John 2:16. “By what a man is overcome …”: 2 Pet 2:19. “If the Son sets you free …”: John 8:36.
- Grace and free will: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.2 (CSEL 44:267–268; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-2).

## Letter 145.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-3
- Source: CSEL 44:268–269
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law reveals human weakness and drives us to grace; the Spirit pours love into our hearts, and love fulfills the law, whereas those who trust their own strength find the law a chain.

### Latin text

Lex itaque docendo et iubendo, quod sine gratia impleri non potest, homini demonstrat suam infirmitatem, ut quaerat demonstrata infirmitas saluatorem, a quo sanata uoluntas possit, quod infirma non posset. lex igitur adducit ad fidem, fides impetrat spiritum largiorem, diffundit spiritus caritatem, implet caritas legem. ideo lex paedagogus uocatur, sub cuius minacissima seueritate qui inuocauerit nomen domini, saluus erit. quo modo autem inuocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? proinde, ne littera sine spiritu occidat, spiritus uiuificans credentibus et inuocantibus datur, caritas uero dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, ut fiat, quod idem apostolus dicit: Plenitudo legis caritas. ita bona est lex illi, qui ea legitime utitur, utitur autem legitime, qui intellegens, quare sit data, per eius comminationem confugit ad gratiam liberantem. huic gratiae, qua iustificatur impius, quisquis ingratus uelut ad legem implendam de suis uiribus fidit, ignorans dei iustitiam et suam uolens constituere, iustitiae dei non est subiectus ac per hoc fit ei lex non absolutionis adiutorium sed uinculum criminis, non quia lex malum est, sed quia peccatum, sicut scriptum est, per bonum talibus operatur mortem; per mandatum enim grauius delinquit, qui per mandatum scit, quam malum sit, quod admittit.

### English translation (Claude)

The law, then, by teaching and commanding what cannot be fulfilled without grace, shows man his weakness, so that his weakness, once shown, may seek the Savior, by whom the will, once healed, may be able to do what in its weakness it could not. The law therefore leads to faith, faith obtains a more abundant Spirit, the Spirit pours out love, love fulfills the law. That is why the law is called a tutor; under its most threatening severity, whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. But how will they call on him in whom they have not believed? Therefore, so that the letter may not kill without the Spirit, the life-giving Spirit is given to those who believe and call, and the love of God is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us, so that what the same apostle says may come about: “Love is the fulfillment of the law.” So the law is good to one who uses it lawfully; and he uses it lawfully who, understanding why it was given, flees under its threat to liberating grace. Whoever is ungrateful to this grace, by which the ungodly is justified, and trusts in his own strength as if to fulfill the law, being ignorant of God’s righteousness and wishing to establish his own, is not subject to the righteousness of God; and so the law becomes for him not an aid to acquittal but the chain of guilt; not because the law is evil, but because sin, as it is written, works death in such people through what is good. For through the commandment one sins more gravely who through the commandment knows how evil is what he commits.

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:14: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The law as tutor: Gal 3:24. “Whoever calls …”, “How will they call …”: Rom 10:13–14 (Joel 2:32). “The letter kills”: 2 Cor 3:6. “The love of God is poured out …”: Rom 5:5. “Love is the fulfillment of the law”: Rom 13:10. “Good to one who uses it lawfully”: 1 Tim 1:8. The ungodly justified: Rom 4:5; ignorant of God’s righteousness: Rom 10:3; sin working death through what is good: Rom 7:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.3 (CSEL 44:268–269; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-3).

## Letter 145.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-4
- Source: CSEL 44:269–270
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Abstaining from sin only for fear of punishment is not righteousness; the righteous fear sin itself out of love, the chaste fear that perfect love does not cast out.

### Latin text

Inaniter autem putat uictorem se esse peccati, qui poenae timore non peccat, quia, etsi non impletur foris negotium malae cupiditatis, ipsa tamen mala cupiditas intus est hostis. et quis coram deo innocens inuenitur, qui uult fieri, quod uetatur, si subtrahas, quod timetur? ac per hoc in ipsa uoluntate reus est, qui uult facere, quod non licet fieri, sed ideo non facit, quia impune non potest fieri. nam quantum in ipso est, mallet non esse iustitiam peccata prohibentem atque punientem et utique, si mallet non esse iustitiam, quis dubitauerit, quod eam, si posset, auferret? ac per hoc quo modo iustus est iustitiae talis inimicus, ut eam, si potestas detur, praecipientem auferat, ne comminantem uel iudicantem ferat? inimicus ergo iustitiae est, qui poenae timore non peccat, amicus autem erit, si eius amore non peccet; tunc enim uere timebit peccare. nam qui gehennas metuit, non peccare metuit sed ardere; ille autem peccare metuit, qui peccatum ipsum sicut gehennas odit. ipse est timor domini castus, permanens in saeculum saeculi; nam ille timor poenae tormentum habet et non est in caritate eumque perfecta caritas foras mittit.

### English translation (Claude)

But he thinks in vain that he is a conqueror of sin who does not sin from fear of punishment; for, even if the business of evil desire is not carried out outwardly, the evil desire itself is an enemy within. And who is found innocent before God who wants what is forbidden to be done, if you take away what is feared? And so in his very will he is guilty who wants to do what is not lawful, but does not do it only because it cannot be done with impunity. For as far as it lies with him, he would rather there were no justice forbidding and punishing sins; and surely, if he would rather there were no justice, who would doubt that he would abolish it if he could? How, then, is he righteous who is such an enemy of justice that, if he were given the power, he would abolish it when it commands, so as not to endure it when it threatens or judges? He, then, is an enemy of justice who does not sin from fear of punishment; but he will be its friend if he does not sin from love of it; for then he will truly fear to sin. For he who fears hell fears not to sin but to burn; but he fears to sin who hates sin itself as he hates hell. This is the chaste fear of the Lord, enduring for ever and ever; for that fear of punishment has torment and is not in love, and perfect love casts it out.

### Scripture references

- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “The fear of the Lord is chaste, enduring for ever and ever”: Ps 19:9 (LXX 18:10). “Fear has torment … perfect love casts out fear”: 1 John 4:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.4 (CSEL 44:269–270; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-4).

## Letter 145.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-5
- Source: CSEL 44:270–271
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Righteousness should be served out of delight, as sin once was; mature love of righteousness persists even under torture, letting good works shine.

### Latin text

Tantum porro quisque peccatum odit, quantum iustitiam diligit, quod non poterit lege terrente per litteram sed spiritu sanante per gratiam. tunc fit, quod apostolus admonet: Humanum dico propter infirmitatem carnis uestrae; sicut enim exhibuistis membra uestra deseruire inmunditiae et iniquitati ad iniustitiam, sic nunc exhibete membra uestra deseruire iustitiae in sanctificationem. quid est enim sicut illud ita et hoc nisi quem ad modum ad peccandum nullus uos cogebat timor sed ipsius libido uoluptasque peccati, sic ad iuste uiuendum non uos supplicii metus urgeat, sed ducat delectatio caritasque iustitiae? et haec quidem, quantum mihi uidetur, nondum est perfecta sed quodam modo adulta iustitia. neque enim frustra praemitteret: Humanum dico propter infirmitatem carnis uestrae, nisi quia plus aliquid dicendum fuit, si iam illi ferre potuissent. plus quippe seruitutis debetur iustitiae, quam peccato solent homines exhibere. nam poena corporis etsi non a uoluntate tamen reuocat ab opere peccati nec facile quisque est, qui palam committat, quo inlicitam et inmundam percipiat uoluptatem, si cruciatus uindictae certum est continuo secuturos. iustitia uero sic amanda est, ut ab eius operibus etiam poenae corporis nos cohibere non debeant atque inter manus etiam crudelium inimicorum luceant opera nostra coram hominibus, ut, quibus placere possunt, glorificent patrem nostrum, qui in caelis est.

### English translation (Claude)

Each person hates sin as much as he loves righteousness, and this he cannot do with the law terrifying him through the letter, but only with the Spirit healing him through grace. Then what the apostle urges comes about: “I speak in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh; for just as you presented your members to serve uncleanness and iniquity for iniquity, so now present your members to serve righteousness for sanctification.” For what does “as that, so this” mean, except: just as no fear compelled you to sin, but the lust and pleasure of sin itself, so let not dread of punishment drive you to live righteously, but let delight in righteousness and love of it lead you? And this, as it seems to me, is a righteousness not yet perfect, but in a certain way grown up. For he would not have said beforehand without reason, “I speak in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh,” unless there had been something more to say, if they had already been able to bear it. For more service is owed to righteousness than men usually give to sin. For bodily punishment, though not from the will, at least calls one back from the deed of sin; and hardly anyone would openly commit a deed in which he gains an unlawful and unclean pleasure if it were certain that torments of punishment would follow at once. But righteousness is to be so loved that not even bodily punishments should restrain us from its works, and that even in the hands of cruel enemies our works may shine before men, so that those whom they can please may glorify our Father who is in heaven.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “I speak in human terms …”: Rom 6:19. “Let your works shine before men …”: Matt 5:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.5 (CSEL 44:270–271; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-5).

## Letter 145.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-6
- Source: CSEL 44:271–272
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's 'Who will separate us from the love of Christ?' shows that we cling to Christ, who is our righteousness, by love and not by fear of punishment.

### Latin text

Hinc est, quod ille fortissimus iustitiae dilector exclamat: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? tribulatio? an angustia? an persecutio? an fames? an nuditas? an periculum? an gladius? sicut scriptum est: Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus ut oues occisionis. sed in his omnibus superuincimus per eum, qui dilexit nos. certus sum enim, quia neque mors neque uita neque angelus neque principatus neque praesentia neque futura neque uirtus neque altitudo neque profundum neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate dei, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. uide, quem ad modum non utcumque ait: Quis nos separabit a Christo? sed ostendens, unde cohaereamus Christo: Quis nos, inquit, separabit a caritate Christi? caritate igitur Christo, non poenae timore cohaeremus. deinde commemoratis eis, quae uidentur habere uiolentiam nec tamen habent ualentiam separandi, ita conclusit, ut eandem diceret caritatem dei, quam dixerat Christi. et quid est a caritate Christi nisi a caritate iustitiae? de illo quippe dictum est: Qui factus est nobis sapientia a deo et iustitia et sanctificatio et redemptio, ut, quem ad modum scriptum est, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. sicut ergo ille est iniquissimus, quem nec poenae corporales deterrent ab inmundis operibus sordidae uoluptatis, ita ille iustissimus, qui nec poenarum corporalium terrore reuocatur a sanctis operibus luminosissimae caritatis.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence that most courageous lover of righteousness cries out: “Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or the sword? As it is written: For your sake we are put to death all day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter. But in all these things we more than conquer through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angel, nor principality, nor things present, nor things to come, nor power, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” See how he does not say loosely, “Who will separate us from Christ?” but, showing by what we cleave to Christ, says, “Who will separate us from the love of Christ?” It is by love, then, that we cleave to Christ, not by fear of punishment. Then, having listed the things that seem to have violence yet do not have the strength to separate, he concluded by calling the same love the love of God which he had called the love of Christ. And what is “from the love of Christ” but “from the love of righteousness”? For of him it was said: “Who became for us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification and redemption, so that, as it is written, let him who boasts boast in the Lord.” Just as, then, he is most wicked whom not even bodily punishments deter from the unclean works of sordid pleasure, so he is most righteous who is not called back by the terror of bodily punishments from the holy works of most luminous love.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:35: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:36: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 44:22 (43:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:37: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:38: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:39: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:30: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:35–39 (with Ps 44:22, LXX 43:23). “Who became for us wisdom …”: 1 Cor 1:30–31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.6 (CSEL 44:271–272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-6).

## Letter 145.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-7
- Source: CSEL 44:272
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since love comes from the Holy Spirit, those who lack it must ask for it in prayer, and with it can glory even in tribulation.

### Latin text

Quae caritas dei, quod perpetua cogitatione tenendum est, diffunditur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. cum ergo nos huius caritatis, qua lex uerissime impletur, pauperes egentesque sentimus, non de inopia nostra diuitias eius exigere sed orando petere, quaerere, pulsare debemus, ut ille, apud quem est fons uitae, det nobis inebriari ab ubertate domus suae et uoluptatis suae potare torrentem, quo inundati atque uegetati non solum tristitia non absorbeamur, uerum etiam gloriemur in tribulationibus, scientes, quia tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia probationem, probatio spem, spes uero non confundit, non quia per nos ipsos hoc possumus, sed quoniam caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

This love of God, which must be held in constant thought, is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us, so that he who boasts may boast in the Lord. When, therefore, we feel that we are poor and needy of this love, by which the law is most truly fulfilled, we ought not to demand its riches from our own poverty, but to ask, seek, and knock in prayer, so that he with whom is the fountain of life may give us to be drunk with the abundance of his house and to drink of the torrent of his pleasure. Flooded and refreshed by it, we shall not only not be swallowed up by sadness, but we shall even glory in tribulations, knowing that tribulation produces patience, patience proven character, proven character hope, and hope does not put to shame; not because we can do this by ourselves, but because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 36:8 (35:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:5; 1 Cor 1:31; “ask, seek, knock”: Matt 7:7. “With you is the fountain of life … drunk with the abundance of your house … torrent of your pleasure”: Ps 36:8–9 (LXX 35:9–10). “Tribulation produces patience …”: Rom 5:3–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.7 (CSEL 44:272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-7).

## Letter 145.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-8
- Source: CSEL 44:272–273
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns against those (the Pelagians, unnamed) who claim that the will can fulfill the law without grace, which would make the Lord's Prayer pointless.

### Latin text

Delectauit me ista saltem per litteras loqui tecum, quae cum praesente non potui, et hoc non propter te, qui non alta sapiens consentis humilibus, sed propter quosdam, qui nimium adrogant humanae uoluntati, quam lege data putant ad eam implendam sibi posse sufficere nulla super doctrinam legis gratia sanctae inspirationis adiutam. per quorum disputationem infirmitati hominum miserae atque indigae suadetur, ut nec orare debeamus, ne intremus in temptationem, non quia hoc audent aperte dicere, sed eorum sententiam uelint nolint hoc utique sequitur. nam ut quid nobis dicitur: Vigilate et orate, ne intretis in temptationem? ut quid etiam secundum hanc exhortationem, cum doceret orare, praecepit, ut dicamus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, si hoc non impletur ex adiutorio gratiae diuinae, sed id totum est in arbitrio uoluntatis humanae? quid plura? saluta fratres, qui tecum sunt, et orate pro nobis, ut salui simus secundum illam salutem, de qua dicitur: Non est opus sanis medicus sed male habentibus; non ueni uocare iustos sed peccatores. orate ergo pro nobis, ut iusti simus, quod quidem homo non potest, nisi norit et uelit, et erit continuo, qui plene uoluerit; sed hoc ipsum in eo non erit, nisi gratia spiritus sanetur et adiuuetur, ut possit.

### English translation (Claude)

It has pleased me to speak with you at least by letter about these things, which I could not when you were present; and this not on your account, since you do not set your mind on high things but agree with the lowly, but on account of certain people who claim too much for the human will, thinking that, once the law is given, the will can suffice for itself to fulfill it, aided by no grace of holy inspiration beyond the teaching of the law. By their arguments the wretched and needy weakness of men is persuaded that we need not even pray that we may not enter into temptation; not that they dare to say this openly, but this follows from their opinion, whether they like it or not. For why are we told, “Watch and pray, that you may not enter into temptation”? Why also, in keeping with this exhortation, when he taught us to pray, did he command us to say, “Lead us not into temptation,” if this is not fulfilled by the help of divine grace, but lies wholly in the choice of the human will? What more? Greet the brothers who are with you, and pray for us, that we may be saved according to that salvation of which it is said: “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I came not to call the righteous but sinners.” Pray for us, then, that we may be righteous, which a man cannot be unless he knows and wills it; and whoever wills it fully will be so at once; but this very thing will not be in him unless he is healed and helped by the grace of the Spirit so that he can.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:41: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The unnamed opponents are the Pelagians. Grace and the will: translated as written.
- “Do not set your mind on high things, but agree with the lowly”: Rom 12:16. “Watch and pray …”: Matt 26:41. “Lead us not into temptation”: Matt 6:13. “Those who are well …”: Matt 9:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 145.8 (CSEL 44:272–273; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-145-8).

## Letter 146.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-146-1
- Source: CSEL 44:273–274
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine's brief, courteous reply to Pelagius, thanking him for his letter and asking his prayers that he may become what Pelagius thinks him to be.

### Latin text

Gratias ago plurimum, quod me litteris tuis exhilarare dignatus es et certum facere de salute uestra. retribuat tibi dominus bona, quibus semper sis bonus, et cum illo aeterno uiuas in aeternum, domine dilectissime et desiderantissime frater. ego autem etsi in me non agnosco praeconia de me tua, quae tuae benignitatis epistula continet, beniuolo tamen animo erga exiguitatem meam ingratus esse non possum simul admonens, ut potius ores pro me, quo talis a domino fiam, qualem me iam esse arbitraris. [Et alia manu:] Memor nostri incolumis domino placeas, domine dilectissime et desiderantissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

I thank you very much that you have been so kind as to cheer me with your letter and to assure me of your well-being. May the Lord repay you with good things, by which you may always be good and live for ever with him who is eternal, my lord most beloved and most longed-for brother. As for me, although I do not recognize in myself the praises of me which the letter of Your Kindness contains, I cannot be ungrateful for your goodwill toward my insignificance; at the same time I urge you rather to pray for me, that I may be made by the Lord such as you already think me to be. [And in another hand:] Mindful of us, may you please the Lord in safety, my lord most beloved and most longed-for brother.

### Translation notes

- The addressee is Pelagius (ca. 413); the address is not printed in the staged text. Augustine later cited this letter (On the Proceedings of Pelagius 29.53) to show that its courtesy implied no approval of Pelagius’s teaching.
- The bracketed words are the edition’s note that the closing greeting was written in Augustine’s own hand.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 146.1 (CSEL 44:273–274; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/145-1/#p-146-1).

## Letter 147.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-1
- Source: CSEL 44:274–275
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his long letter to Paulina on whether God can be seen with bodily eyes, saying that humility and prayer matter more than words in this inquiry.

### Latin text

Memor debiti, quod ex tua petitione et mea promissione factum est, religiosa famula dei Paulina, persolutionis quoque eius neglegens esse non debui. cum enim petiuisses, ut de inuisibili deo, utrum per oculos corporeos possit uideri, prolixe aliquid copioseque ad te scriberem, negare non potui, ne sanctum studium tuum offenderem; sed promissum distuli siue propter alias occupationes meas siue quod a me id flagitaretur, unde aliquanto diutius cogitari oportebat. sed cum tanta res esset, quae cogitando, non tam quid de ea sentiendum dicendumue esset, quam quonam modo persuadendum his, qui diuersa sentirent, fieret difficilior, finem aliquando dilationi adhibendum putaui sperans diuinum adiutorium magis mihi scribenti quam differenti adfuturum. quam ob rem primum mihi uidetur plus ualere in hac inquisitione uiuendi quam loquendi modum. nam qui didicerunt a domino Iesu Christo mites esse et humiles corde, plus cogitando et orando proficiunt quam legendo et audiendo. nec ideo tamen agere partes suas sermo cessauerit, sed, cum plantator et rigator officium sui gesserit muneris, cetera illi, qui dat incrementum, relinquit; ille quippe etiam ipsum plantatorem rigatoremque formauit.

### English translation (Claude)

Mindful of the debt incurred by your request and my promise, Paulina, devout handmaid of God, I ought not to be negligent in paying it. For when you asked me to write to you at length and fully about the invisible God, whether he can be seen with bodily eyes, I could not refuse, lest I offend your holy zeal; but I put off my promise, either because of my other occupations or because what was being asked of me required somewhat longer thought. But since the matter was so great that, as I thought about it, it became more difficult, not so much as to what should be thought or said about it, as to how those who think otherwise might be persuaded, I decided that at some point an end must be put to the delay, hoping that divine help would be more present to me in writing than in delaying. For this reason it seems to me, first, that in this inquiry the manner of living counts for more than the manner of speaking. For those who have learned from the Lord Jesus Christ to be meek and humble of heart make more progress by thinking and praying than by reading and hearing. Not that speech will therefore cease to play its part; but when the planter and the waterer have performed the duty of their office, they leave the rest to him who gives the growth; for he also formed the planter and the waterer himself.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 147 is the treatise-letter On Seeing God (De uidendo deo), written ca. 413 to Paulina; the address is not printed in the staged text.
- “Learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart”: Matt 11:29. Planter and waterer: 1 Cor 3:6–7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.1 (CSEL 44:274–275; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-1).

## Letter 147.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-2
- Source: CSEL 44:275–276
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Paulina to listen with the inner self, which does not age, and to believe not his authority but the canonical Scriptures or the truth seen within.

### Latin text

Secundum interiorem igitur hominem percipe uerba intellectus. ipse enim renouatur de die in diem, etiam cum exterior iste corrumpitur siue castigatione abstinentiae siue aliqua morbida ualitudine siue quolibet casu uel certe, quod necesse est etiam his, qui sano corpore diu uiuunt, ipso aetatis accessu. erige itaque spiritum mentis tuae, qui renouatur in agnitione secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit eum, ubi per fidem in te habitat Christus, ubi non est Iudaeus et Graecus, seruus liber, masculus femina, ubi non morieris, cum solui corpore coeperis, quia nec ibi marcuisti, cum sis annis grauis. hoc interiore tuo erecta intende et uide, quae loquor. nolo auctoritatem meam sequaris, ut ideo putes tibi aliquid necesse esse credere, quoniam a me dicitur; sed aut scripturis canonicis credas, si quid nondum, quam sit uerum, uides, aut interius demonstranti ueritati, ut hoc plane uideas.

### English translation (Claude)

Receive, then, words of understanding according to the inner man. For he is renewed from day to day, even while this outer man is wasting away, whether through the discipline of abstinence, or some sickly state of health, or any chance whatever, or certainly, as must happen even to those who live long in sound health, through the very advance of age. Raise up, then, the spirit of your mind, which is renewed in knowledge according to the image of him who created it, where Christ dwells in you through faith, where there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, where you will not die when you begin to be released from the body, because there you have not withered either, though you are heavy with years. Lifted up in this inner self of yours, attend and see what I say. I do not want you to follow my authority, so as to think you must believe something because it is said by me; but believe either the canonical Scriptures, if there is something whose truth you do not yet see, or the truth showing itself within, so that you see it plainly.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:23: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:10: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 3:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The inner man renewed day by day: 2 Cor 4:16. Renewed in the spirit of your mind: Eph 4:23. Renewed in knowledge according to the image of the Creator: Col 3:10. Christ dwelling through faith: Eph 3:17. Neither Jew nor Greek …: Gal 3:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.2 (CSEL 44:275–276; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-2).

## Letter 147.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-3
- Source: CSEL 44:276–278
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes seeing with the body (the sun) from seeing with the mind (one's own life and will), and notes that we believe God will be seen only because Scripture says so.

### Latin text

Exempli gratia dicam aliquid, quo ad haec certius praestruaris, et inde potissimum, unde nobis in hoc ipso opere propositus est disputandi labor. credimus uideri deum nunc; num quia uidimus uel per oculos corporis, sicut uidemus hunc solem, uel mentis obtutu, sicut se quisque interius uidet, uiuentem, uidet uolentem, uidet quaerentem, uidet scientem, uidet nescientem? tu itaque ipsa lectis his litteris solem quidem uidisse te recolis per oculos corporis, potes etiam statim uidere, si est id temporis et eo loci es, ubi ex ea parte caelum oculis tuis usque ad solem contuendum patet ad illa uero uidenda, quae mente conspici dixi, id est quod uiuas, quod uidere deum uelis, quod id requiras, quod te uiuere et uelle et quaerere scias, quo modo autem deus uideatur, nescias, ad haec, inquam, omnia uidenda non oculos corporis adhibes nec interuallum loci, per quod intendatur obtutus, ut ad ea cernenda perueniat, sentis aut quaeris; sic uides uitam tuam, uoluntatem, inquisitionem, scientiam, ignorantiam, quia nec ipsa est contemnenda uisio uidere, quod nescias. sic, inquam, uides haec omnia, ut in te uideas, apud te habeas ac sine ullis figurarum liniamentis colorumque nitoribus tanto clarius et certius quanto simplicius interiusque conspicias. cum igitur nec corporis oculis sicut corpora siue caelestia siue terrestria nec mentis aspectu, sicut ea sunt, quorum nonnulla commemoraui, quae apud temet ipsam certissime intueris, nunc uideamus deum, cur credimus eum uideri, nisi quia scripturae accommodamus fidem, ubi legitur: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, et si qua alia in hanc sententiam eadem diuina auctoritate conscripta sunt, cui non credere nefas ducimus, credere autem pietatis esse minime dubitamus?

### English translation (Claude)

To give an example by which you may be more surely prepared for these things, I shall take it chiefly from the very matter that has set us the labor of discussion in this work. We believe that God is seen; is that because we have now seen him, either with the eyes of the body, as we see this sun, or with the gaze of the mind, as each person sees himself within: sees himself living, sees himself willing, sees himself seeking, sees himself knowing, sees himself not knowing? You yourself, then, having read this letter, remember that you have seen the sun with the eyes of the body, and you can even see it at once, if it is the right time and you are in a place where the sky on that side lies open to your eyes so that you can look at the sun. But to see the things that I said are perceived by the mind, that is, that you live, that you wish to see God, that you are seeking this, that you know that you live and wish and seek, but do not know how God is seen: to see all these, I say, you do not use the eyes of the body, nor do you feel or look for any distance of space across which your gaze must be directed to reach and discern them. In this way you see your life, your will, your inquiry, your knowledge, your ignorance (for even this is not a sight to be despised, to see what you do not know). In this way, I say, you see all these things, so that you see them in yourself, have them with you, and perceive them without any outlines of shapes or brightness of colors, all the more clearly and surely the more simply and inwardly you behold them. Since, then, we do not now see God either with the eyes of the body, as we see bodies, whether heavenly or earthly, or with the gaze of the mind, as we see the things I have mentioned, which you behold most surely within yourself, why do we believe that he is seen, except because we give our faith to the Scripture where we read, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and to whatever else has been written to this effect by the same divine authority, which we count it wicked not to believe, and do not doubt at all that it is a mark of piety to believe?

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Blessed are the pure in heart …”: Matt 5:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.3 (CSEL 44:276–278; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-3).

## Letter 147.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-4
- Source: CSEL 44:278
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: What is not seen by body or mind can only be believed; the canonical Scriptures must be believed without doubt, while other testimony is weighed on its merits.

### Latin text

Hanc itaque distinctionem tene, ut, si quid te admonuero disserendo, quod ita uideas oculis carnis uel ullo alio sensu eius sentias seu te sensisse recolas, sicut sentiuntur colores, fragores, odores, sapores, feruores et si quid aliud per corpus cernendo, audiendo, olfaciendo, gustando, tangendo sentimus, aut ita uideas mentis intuitu, ut uides uitam, uoluntatem, cogitationem, memoriam, intellegentiam, scientiam, fidem tuam et quicquid aliud mente conspicis atque ita esse non tantum credendo sed plane uidendo non dubitas, hoc me iudices ostendisse. quod autem non sic ostendero, ut aut corporis aut animi sensu uisum perceptumque teneatur, et tamen dixero aliquid, quod aut uerum quidem aut falsum esse necesse sit, sed nullo illorum duorum genere uideatur, restat, ut tantum modo credatur uel non credatur. sed si diuinarum scripturarum earum scilicet, quae canonicae in ecclesia nominantur, perspicua firmatur auctoritate, sine ulla dubitatione credendum est. aliis uero testibus uel testimoniis, quibus aliquid credendum esse suadetur, tibi credere uel non credere liceat, quantum ea momenti ad faciendam fidem uel habere uel non habere perpenderis.

### English translation (Claude)

Hold to this distinction, then: if in my discussion I point out to you something that you either see with the eyes of the flesh or perceive with any other of its senses, or remember having perceived, as colors, sounds, smells, tastes, heat are perceived, and whatever else we perceive through the body by seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching; or something that you see with the gaze of the mind, as you see your life, will, thought, memory, understanding, knowledge, faith, and whatever else you perceive with the mind and do not doubt to be so, not only by believing but by plainly seeing; then judge that I have shown it. But if I do not so show something that it is held as seen and perceived by the sense either of the body or of the mind, and yet I say something that must be either true or false but is not seen by either of those two kinds, it remains that it is only believed or not believed. But if it is confirmed by the clear authority of the divine Scriptures, namely those that are called canonical in the Church, it is to be believed without any doubt. As for other witnesses or testimonies by which one is urged to believe something, you may believe them or not, according as you judge them to have or not to have weight to produce belief.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.4 (CSEL 44:278; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-4).

## Letter 147.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-5
- Source: CSEL 44:278–280
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Much ordinary knowledge (history, one's parentage) rests on others' testimony; errors there are harmless unless they touch the faith, but nothing should be rashly believed.

### Latin text

Si enim ea, quae non uidimus, hoc est in praesenti apparentia non sensimus uel mente uel corpore neque de scripturis sanctis uel legendo uel audiendo didicimus, nulla omnino credidissemus, unde sciremus esse ciuitates, ubi numquam fuimus, uel a Romulo conditam Romam uel, ut de propioribus loquar, Constantinopolim a Constantino? unde postremo sciremus, quinam parentes nos procreauissent, quibus patribus, auis, maioribus geniti essemus? talium quippe cum plurima sciamus, non tamen ea uel ullo sensu praesentia sicut solem, sicut nostri animi uoluntatem uel canonicorum eloquiorum auctoritate sicut Adam fuisse primum hominem aut Christum in carne natum passumque resurrexisse didicimus sed aliis referentibus, de quorum testimonio in hoc dum taxat rerum genere minime dubitandum esse putauimus. in quibus si alicubi fallimur credendo uel ita esse, quod ita non est, uel non ita esse, quod ita est, nihil periculi esse iudicamus, si non sit contra illam fidem, qua pietas informatur. haec praelocutio mea nondum propositam discutit quaestionem, sed te atque alios, qui ista lecturi sunt, praestruit, quales seu meorum seu quorumlibet scriptorum iudices esse debeatis, ne uel scire uos opinemini, quod nescitis, uel temere credatis, quod neque corporis sensibus aut animi contuitu in eiusdem rei, quae cognoscenda est, euidentia percepistis neque canonicarum scripturarum auctoritate, etiam si non adfuit sensibus uel animi uel corporis uestri, tamen credendum esse didicistis.

### English translation (Claude)

For if we had believed nothing at all of what we have not seen, that is, have not perceived as present either by mind or by body, nor learned from the holy Scriptures by reading or hearing, how would we know that there are cities where we have never been, or that Rome was founded by Romulus, or, to speak of nearer things, Constantinople by Constantine? How, finally, would we know what parents begot us, from what fathers, grandfathers, and ancestors we were born? For although we know a great many such things, we have learned them neither by any sense, as present, like the sun or the will of our own mind, nor by the authority of the canonical writings, as that Adam was the first man or that Christ was born in the flesh, suffered, and rose again, but from others who reported them, whose testimony, at least in this kind of matter, we thought should not be doubted at all. If in these things we are sometimes deceived by believing either that something is so which is not so, or that something is not so which is so, we judge that there is no danger, provided it is not against that faith by which piety is formed. These preliminary remarks of mine do not yet discuss the proposed question, but they prepare you and others who will read this to know what kind of judges you ought to be, whether of my writings or of anyone’s, so that you do not suppose you know what you do not know, nor rashly believe what you have neither perceived by the senses of the body or the gaze of the mind in the evidence of the thing itself that is to be known, nor learned must be believed on the authority of the canonical Scriptures, even if it was not present to the senses of your mind or body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.5 (CSEL 44:278–280; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-5).

## Letter 147.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-6
- Source: CSEL 44:280
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine clarifies that believing differs from mentally beholding what is present, as the virgin birth and resurrection are believed rather than seen.

### Latin text

Iamne ergo uenimus ad causam? an adhuc lecturas instruendus est? nonnulli enim putant ipsum, quod dicimus credere, cum res uera creditur, hoc solum esse mente contueri. quod si ita est, fallitur ista nostra praelocutio, in qua distinximus aliud esse aliquid sentire per corpus sicut in caelo solem et in terra montem, arborem corpusue quodlibet et aliud mentis intuitu rem nihilo minus euidentem, sicut nostra uoluntas a nobismet ipsis intus aspicitur, cum aliquid uolumus, uel cogitatio, cum cogitamus, uel memoria, cum recordamur, uel tale aliquid in animo sine corpore, aliud autem credere, quod in corporis mentisue conspectu nec adest nec adfuisse recolitur sicut sine parentibus creatum Adam et natum ex uirgine passumque resurrexisse Christum. haec enim etiam corporaliter facta sunt et uideri per corpus, si tunc adessemus, utique potuerunt, nunc autem non adsunt, sicut adest ista lux, quae oculis cernitur, aut uoluntas, qua nunc aliquid uolumus, quae mente conspicitur. sed quia haec distinctio falsa non est, profecto illa praestructio minus habebat, quod inter credere et aliquid praesens mente conspicere, ne omni modo unum atque idem putaretur, parum clara fuerat elocutione discretum.

### English translation (Claude)

Have we now come to the matter, then? Or must the reader still be instructed? For some think that what we call believing, when a true thing is believed, is simply beholding with the mind. If that is so, this preface of ours is mistaken, in which we distinguished perceiving something through the body, as the sun in the sky and a mountain, a tree, or any body on earth; and, on the other hand, beholding with the gaze of the mind a thing no less evident, as our will is perceived within by ourselves when we will something, or our thought when we think, or our memory when we remember, or some such thing in the mind without the body; and, on the other hand again, believing what is neither present to the view of body or mind nor remembered to have been present, as that Adam was created without parents, and that Christ was born of a virgin, suffered, and rose again. For these things were also done bodily and certainly could have been seen through the body if we had been there; but now they are not present, as this light is present, which is discerned with the eyes, or the will by which we now will something, which is perceived by the mind. But since this distinction is not false, that preparation was certainly lacking in this: that the difference between believing and beholding something present with the mind, so that they should not be thought entirely one and the same, had not been set out in clear enough language.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.6 (CSEL 44:280; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-6).

## Letter 147.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-7
- Source: CSEL 44:280–281
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Things present to the senses of mind or body are seen; things absent are believed on testimony, while things once seen and remembered count as seen.

### Latin text

Quid ergo dicemus? num satis est, ut inter uidere et credere hoc distare dicamus, quia praesentia uidentur, creduntur absentia? plane forsitan satis est, si praesentia illa hoc loco intellegamus dicta, quae praesto sunt sensibus siue animi siue corporis, unde etiam ducto uocabulo praesentia nominantur. sic enim hanc lucem corporis sensu, sic et meam uoluntatem plane uideo, quia praesto est animi mei sensibus atque intus mihi praesens est. si quis uero mihi indicet uoluntatem suam, cuius os et uox mihi praesens est, tamen, quia ipsa uoluntas, quam mihi indicat, latet sensum corporis et animi mei, credo, non uideo aut, si eum mentiri existimo, non credo, etsi forte, ut dicit, ita sit. creduntur ergo illa, quae absunt a sensibus nostris, si uidetur idoneum, quod eis testimonium perhibetur; uidentur autem, quae praesto sunt, unde et praesentia nominantur, uel animi uel corporis sensibus. nam cum sint quinque corporis sensus, cernendi, audiendi, olfaciendi, gustandi, tangendi, uisus quidem in eis praecipue oculis adtributus est, uerum tamen hoc uerbo utimur et in ceteris. neque enim tantum dicimus: Vide, quid luceat sed etiam: Vide, quid sonet; Vide, quid oleat; Vide, quid sapiat; Vide, quid caleat. nec, quia dixi ea credi, quae absunt a sensibus nostris, sic accipiatur, ut inter illa deputentur, quae aliquando uidimus et nos uidisse retinemus certique sumus, quamuis tunc non praesto sint, cum recoluntur a nobis; neque enim inter credita sed inter uisa deputantur et ideo nota sunt, non quia fidem habuimus aliis testibus, sed quia nos uidisse sine dubio recordamur et scimus.

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, shall we say? Is it enough to say that seeing and believing differ in this, that things present are seen and things absent are believed? Perhaps it is quite enough, if we understand “present” here to mean what is at hand to the senses, whether of the mind or of the body, from which the word “present” is derived. For in this way I plainly see this light by the sense of the body, and in this way also my will, because it is at hand to the senses of my mind and is present to me within. But if someone whose face and voice are present to me tells me his will, yet, because the will itself that he tells me is hidden from the sense of my body and mind, I believe it, I do not see it; or, if I think he is lying, I do not believe it, even if perhaps it is as he says. Those things, therefore, are believed which are absent from our senses, if the testimony given to them seems adequate; but those are seen which are at hand, and hence are called present, to the senses of mind or body. For although there are five bodily senses, seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, sight is attributed chiefly to the eyes; yet we use this word for the others too. For we say not only, “See what is shining,” but also, “See what is sounding,” “See what smells,” “See what tastes,” “See what is hot.” And since I said that those things are believed which are absent from our senses, let this not be taken to include things we once saw and remember having seen and are sure of, although they are not at hand when we recall them. For they are counted not among things believed but among things seen, and so they are known, not because we gave credit to other witnesses, but because we remember without doubt and know that we saw them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.7 (CSEL 44:280–281; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-7).

## Letter 147.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-8
- Source: CSEL 44:281–282
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Knowledge comprises things seen and things believed on adequate testimony; faith itself is seen by the mind, though its object is not.

### Latin text

Constat igitur nostra scientia ex uisis rebus et creditis. sed in his, quae uidimus uel uidemus, nos ipsi testes sumus, in his autem, quae credimus, aliis testibus mouemur ad fidem, cum earum rerum, quas nec uidisse nos recolimus nec uidemus, dantur signa uel in uocibus uel in litteris uel in quibusque documentis, quibus uisis non uisa credantur. non autem inmerito scire nos dicimus non solum ea, quae uidimus aut uidemus, uerum et illa, quae idoneis ad quamque rem commoti testimoniis uel testibus credimus. porro si scire non incongruenter dicimur etiam illud, quod certissimum credimus, hinc factum est, ut etiam recte credita, etsi non adsint sensibus nostris, uidere mente dicamur. scientia quippe menti tribuitur, siue per corporis sensus siue per ipsum animum aliquid perceptum cognitumque retineat, et fides ipsa mente utique uidetur, quamuis hoc fide credatur, quod non uidetur. unde et apostolus Petrus dicit: In quem modo non uidentes creditis, et ipse dominus: Beati, qui non uiderunt et crediderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Our knowledge, then, consists of things seen and things believed. But in the things we have seen or see, we ourselves are the witnesses; in the things we believe, we are moved to faith by other witnesses, when signs are given, in words or letters or other evidence, of things we neither remember having seen nor see, so that, when these signs are seen, the things not seen are believed. And we are not wrong to say that we know not only the things we have seen or see, but also those we believe when moved by testimonies or witnesses adequate to each matter. Further, if we are not inappropriately said to know even what we most surely believe, it follows that we are also said to see with the mind things rightly believed, even if they are not present to our senses. For knowledge is attributed to the mind, whether it holds something perceived and known through the senses of the body or through the mind itself; and faith itself is certainly seen by the mind, although what is believed by faith is not seen. Hence the apostle Peter also says: “In whom, though you do not now see him, you believe”; and the Lord himself: “Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 20:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Pet 1:8; John 20:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.8 (CSEL 44:281–282; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-8).

## Letter 147.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-9
- Source: CSEL 44:282–283
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A believer in the resurrection sees the witness, the words, his own faith and will, and a mental image of the resurrection, but not the resurrection itself.

### Latin text

Cum itaque dicitur homini: Crede Christum resurrexisse a mortuis, si credit, adtende, quid uideat, adtende, quid credat, et utrumque discerne. uidet hominem, cuius audit uocem, et ipsa uox in uisis corporalibus deputatur secundum ea, quae supra diximus. haec duo sunt, testis et testimonium, quorum ad oculos unum, ad aures alterum pertinet sed hunc testem fortasse aliorum testimoniorum auctoritate confirmat, diuinarum scilicet scripturarum uel quorumlibet aliorum, quibus est motus ad fidem. scripturae ad uisa pertinent corporis: oculorum, si eas legit, uel aurium, si audiuit. uidet autem animo quicquid figuris litterarum sonisue significari intellexit; uidet ipsam fidem suam, qua se credere sine cunctatione respondet; uidet cogitationem, qua cogitat, quid ei possit prodesse, quod credit; uidet uoluntatem, qua accessit ad suscipiendam religionem; uidet etiam ipsius resurrectionis quandam imaginem in animo suo factam, sine qua intellegi non potest, quicquid factum corporaliter dicitur, siue credatur siue non credatur. Sed, ut puto, distinguis, quo modo uideat fidem suam, qua credit, et quo modo uideat illam resurrectionis imaginem in animo suo factam, quam, si hoc audit, uidet, etiam qui non credit.

### English translation (Claude)

So when a man is told, “Believe that Christ has risen from the dead,” if he believes, note what he sees, note what he believes, and distinguish the two. He sees the man whose voice he hears, and the voice itself is counted among things seen bodily, according to what we said above. These are two, the witness and the testimony, one belonging to the eyes and the other to the ears. But perhaps he confirms this witness by the authority of other testimonies, namely of the divine Scriptures or any others by which he has been moved to faith. The Scriptures belong to things seen by the body: by the eyes if he reads them, or by the ears if he has heard them. But he sees with the mind whatever he has understood to be signified by the shapes of the letters or by the sounds; he sees his own faith, by which he answers without hesitation that he believes; he sees the thought by which he considers what benefit there can be for him in what he believes; he sees the will by which he has come to embrace the religion; he also sees a certain image of the resurrection itself formed in his mind, without which nothing said to have happened bodily can be understood, whether it is believed or not. But, I think, you distinguish how he sees his faith by which he believes, and how he sees that image of the resurrection formed in his mind, which even one who does not believe sees, if he hears of it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.9 (CSEL 44:282–283; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-9).

## Letter 147.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-10
- Source: CSEL 44:283–284
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even the disciples did not see the resurrection happen but believed it on seeing the risen Christ; we believe the whole, which is present neither to our senses nor to our minds.

### Latin text

Haec ergo omnia uidet partim corpore partim mente. uoluntatem uero eius, a quo audit, ut credat, et ipsam Christi resurrectionem non uidet, sed credit; et tamen eam uidere dicitur quodam mentis obtutu magis secundum testimoniorum fidem quam rerum praesentia creditarum. illa enim, quae uidet, adsunt sensibus uel animi uel corporis; quae autem credit, absunt a sensibus et animi et corporis, quamuis uoluntas eius, a quo audit, ut credat, non sit praeterita, sed maneat in loquente. quam in se ipso idem ipse, qui loquitur, uidet; ille uero, qui audit, non eam uidet, sed credit. resurrectio autem Christi praeterita est, quam nec illi uiderunt homines, qui tunc fuerunt; nam qui uiderunt uiuentem Christum, quem uiderant morientem, ipsam tamen resurrectionem, cum fieret, non uiderunt, sed eam certissime crediderunt uidendo et tangendo uiuum, quem nouerant mortuum. nos totum credimus, et quod resurrexerit et quod ab hominibus tunc uisus et contrectatus sit et quod nunc uiuat in caelis nec iam moriatur et mors ei ultra non dominetur. res autem ipsa nec corporis nostri sensibus adest, sicut adest hoc caelum et terra, nec nostrae mentis obtutibus, sicut adest fides ipsa, qua hoc credimus.

### English translation (Claude)

All these things, then, he sees, partly with the body and partly with the mind. But the will of the one from whom he hears that he should believe, and the resurrection of Christ itself, he does not see but believes; and yet he is said to see it by a certain gaze of the mind, according to his faith in the testimonies rather than by the presence of the things believed. For the things he sees are present to the senses of mind or body; but the things he believes are absent from the senses of both mind and body, although the will of the one from whom he hears that he should believe is not past but remains in the speaker. The speaker himself sees it in himself; but the hearer does not see it but believes it. The resurrection of Christ, however, is past, and not even the men who lived then saw it; for those who saw Christ alive, whom they had seen dying, did not see the resurrection itself as it took place, but believed it most surely by seeing and touching alive the one they had known dead. We believe the whole: both that he rose, and that he was then seen and handled by men, and that he now lives in heaven and dies no more, and death no longer has dominion over him. But the thing itself is present neither to the senses of our body, as this sky and earth are present, nor to the gaze of our mind, as the very faith by which we believe it is present.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:39: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Seen and handled: Luke 24:39; 1 John 1:1. “Dies no more; death no longer has dominion over him”: Rom 6:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.10 (CSEL 44:283–284; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-10).

## Letter 147.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-11
- Source: CSEL 44:284–285
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith is visible to the believer's own mind but not its object, and one person's faith is hidden from another until the Lord reveals the thoughts of hearts.

### Latin text

Sed iam satis, ut puto, ista mea praelocutione recognouisti, quid sit uidere uel mente uel corpore et quid ab eis distet credere, quod quidem fit mente et uidetur mente, quoniam menti nostrae fides nostra conspicua est. sed tamen, quod eadem fide creditur, abest et ab aspectu corporis nostri, sicut abest corpus, in quo Christus resurrexit, et ab aspectu mentis alterius, sicut abest ab aspectu mentis meae fides tua, quamuis eam esse in te credam, cum eam non uideam corpore, quod nec tu potes, nec mente, quod tu potes, sicut ego meam, quam tu non potes. nemo enim scit, quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est, donec ueniat dominus, qui et inluminabit abscondita tenebrarum et manifestabit cogitationes cordis, ut eas non solum quisque suas uideat sed et aliorum. secundum hoc enim dixit apostolus neminem scire, quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est, secundum quod uidemus in nobis; nam secundum id, quod credimus nec uidemus, et multos fideles esse nouimus et multis noti sumus.

### English translation (Claude)

But I think you have now recognized well enough from this preface of mine what it is to see, whether with the mind or with the body, and how believing differs from these. Believing indeed takes place in the mind and is seen by the mind, since our faith is visible to our mind. And yet what is believed by that same faith is absent both from the sight of our body, as the body in which Christ rose is absent, and from the sight of another’s mind, as your faith is absent from the sight of my mind, although I believe it is in you, since I do not see it with the body, which you cannot either, nor with the mind, which you can, as I can my own, which you cannot. For no one knows what goes on in a man except the spirit of the man that is in him, until the Lord comes, who will both bring to light the hidden things of darkness and make manifest the thoughts of the heart, so that each will see not only his own but also those of others. For it was in this sense that the apostle said that no one knows what goes on in a man except the spirit of the man that is in him, in the sense in which we see in ourselves; for in the sense of what we believe without seeing, we both know many people to be believers and are known to many.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 2:11; “until the Lord comes, who will bring to light …”: 1 Cor 4:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.11 (CSEL 44:284–285; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-11).

## Letter 147.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-12
- Source: CSEL 44:285
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We may rightly say we 'know' God can be seen, as John says 'we know … we shall see him as he is,' though this knowledge rests on believing Scripture.

### Latin text

Si ergo iam ista distincta sunt, ueniamus ad causam. scimus posse deum uideri, quoniam scriptum est: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt. an forte non debui dicere (scimus) sed credimus, quoniam deum nec corpore aliquando uidimus sicut hanc lucem nec mente sicut ipsam in nobis, qua id credimus, fidem, sed tantum quia scriptum est in ea scriptura, cuius fideles sumus, quod uerum sit minime dubitamus? apostolus tamen Iohannes cum tale aliquid diceret: Scimus, inquit, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est. ecce scire se dixit, quod nondum factum fuerat nec uidendo sed credendo cognouerat. recte itaque diximus: Scimus posse deum uideri quamuis eum non uiderimus, sed diuinae auctoritati, quae sanctis libris continetur, crediderimus.

### English translation (Claude)

If these things have now been distinguished, let us come to the matter. We know that God can be seen, since it is written: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” Or perhaps I ought not to have said “we know” but “we believe,” since we have never seen God either with the body, as we see this light, or with the mind, as we see within us the very faith by which we believe this, but we have no doubt at all that it is true only because it is written in that Scripture of which we are believers? Yet the apostle John, when he said something similar, said: “We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.” See, he said that he knew what had not yet happened and what he had come to know not by seeing but by believing. So we were right to say, “We know that God can be seen,” although we have not seen him but have believed the divine authority contained in the holy books.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:8; 1 John 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.12 (CSEL 44:285; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-12).

## Letter 147.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-13
- Source: CSEL 44:285–286
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the apparent contradiction between 'No one has ever seen God' and texts saying that Jacob, Moses, Isaiah, and the angels saw God.

### Latin text

Quid est ergo, quod eadem dicit auctoritas: Deum nemo uidit umquam? an fortasse respondetur, quod illa testimonia de uidendo deo sunt, non de uiso? ipsi enim deum uidebunt, dictum est, non uiderunt, et non (uidimus) sed uidebimus eum sicuti est). proinde his sententiis non est contrarium: Deum nemo uidit umquam. uidebunt enim, quem non uiderunt, qui mundo corde filii dei esse uoluerint. quid est igitur: Vidi deum facie ad faciem et salua facta est anima mea? an et hoc non est contrarium illi, quod dictum est: Deum nemo uidit umquam? et illud, quod de Moyse scriptum est, quia loquebatur cum deo facie ad faciem, sicut quis loquitur ad amicum suum; et illud, quod propheta Esaias de se ipso loquens ait: Vidi dominum sabaoth sedentem in throno, et si qua alia solent similia testimonia ex eadem auctoritate proferri, quo modo non sunt contraria sententiae, qua dictum est: Deum nemo uidit umquam? quamquam et ipsum euangelium potest putari sibi esse contrarium. quo modo enim uerum est, quod in eo dicitur: Qui me uidit, uidit et patrem, si deum nemo uidit umquam? quo modo uerum est: Angeli eorum semper uident faciem patris mei, si deum nemo uidit umquam?

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, of the same authority’s saying, “No one has ever seen God”? Perhaps the answer is that those testimonies are about God’s being seen in the future, not about his having been seen? For it was said, “they shall see God,” not “they have seen”; and not “we have seen” but “we shall see him as he is.” Therefore “No one has ever seen God” is not contrary to these statements. For those who have wished to be children of God with pure hearts will see him whom they have not seen. What, then, of “I have seen God face to face, and my soul has been saved”? Is this too not contrary to what was said, “No one has ever seen God”? And what was written of Moses, that he spoke with God face to face, as a man speaks to his friend; and what the prophet Isaiah says of himself, “I saw the Lord of hosts sitting on a throne”; and any other similar testimonies commonly brought forward from the same authority: how are they not contrary to the statement “No one has ever seen God”? And indeed the Gospel itself may be thought to contradict itself. For how is it true, as it says in it, “He who has seen me has seen the Father,” if no one has ever seen God? How is it true, “Their angels always see the face of my Father,” if no one has ever seen God?

### Scripture references

- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 32:30: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:11: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 6:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “No one has ever seen God”: John 1:18 (1 John 4:12). “I have seen God face to face …”: Gen 32:30 (Jacob). Moses: Exod 33:11. “I saw the Lord of hosts …”: Isa 6:1 (with 6:3, 5). “He who has seen me …”: John 14:9. “Their angels always see …”: Matt 18:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.13 (CSEL 44:285–286; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-13).

## Letter 147.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-14
- Source: CSEL 44:286–287
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Reading 'no one' as 'no one of men' explains how angels see God, but not how Abraham, Moses, Isaiah, and others are said to have seen him.

### Latin text

Qua igitur regula intellegentiae ista ueluti contraria et repugnantia non esse contraria nec repugnare probabimus? neque enim fieri ullo modo potest, ut haec scripturarum auctoritas aliqua ex parte mentiatur. si dicimus in eo, quod scriptum est: Deum nemo uidit umquam, homines tantum modo intellegendos, sicut etiam illud dictum est: Nemo scit, quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est, — nemo utique sed hominum; neque enim hoc de deo accipi potest, cum de Christo scriptum sit non opus fuisse, ut quisquam illi testimonium perhiberet de homine, quoniam ipse sciebat, quid esset in homine; nam hoc apostolus planius explicans: Quem nemo, inquit, hominum uidit nec uidere potest — si ergo ita dictum est: Deum nemo uidit umquam, ac si diceretur: Nemo hominum, hactenus illa quaestio soluta uidebitur, ut non sit huic sententiae contrarium, quod dominus ait: Angeli eorum semper uident faciem patris mei, ut scilicet angelos deum uidere credamus, quem nemo uidit umquam sed hominum. quo modo ergo deum uidit Abraham, Isaac, Iacob, Iob, Moyses, Michaeas, Esaias et si qui alii sunt, de quibus ueracissima scriptura testatur, quod deum uiderint, si deum nemo umquam hominum uidit nec uidere potest?

### English translation (Claude)

By what rule of understanding, then, shall we prove that these apparently contrary and conflicting statements are not contrary and do not conflict? For it cannot possibly be that this authority of the Scriptures lies in any part. Suppose we say that in the words “No one has ever seen God” only men are to be understood, as was also said, “No one knows what goes on in a man except the spirit of the man that is in him” (“no one,” that is, of men; for this cannot be taken of God, since it is written of Christ that he had no need for anyone to bear witness to him about man, because he himself knew what was in man; and the apostle explains this more plainly when he says, “whom no one of men has seen or can see”). If, then, “No one has ever seen God” was said as if it were said, “No one of men,” the question will seem solved to this extent: what the Lord said, “Their angels always see the face of my Father,” will not be contrary to that statement, so that we may believe that the angels see God, whom no one, that is, no one of men, has ever seen. How, then, did Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Job, Moses, Micaiah, Isaiah, and any others of whom the most truthful Scripture testifies that they saw God, see him, if no one of men has ever seen God or can see him?

### Scripture references

- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- John 2:25: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 22:19: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 2:11; John 2:25; “whom no one of men has seen or can see”: 1 Tim 6:16. Micaiah: 1 Kgs 22:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.14 (CSEL 44:286–287; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-14).

## Letter 147.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-15
- Source: CSEL 44:287–288
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Some claim from Job that even the devil saw God, but this conflicts with texts that only the pure in heart and holy will see him.

### Latin text

Quamquam nonnulli uolentes probare etiam impios uisuros deum a diabolo quoque ipso deum uisum putant sic accipientes, quod scriptum est in libro Iob uenisse cum angelis et diabolum, in conspectu dei, ut iam et illud ueniat in quaestionem, quomodo dictum sit: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, et illud: Pacem sectamini cum omnibus et sanctificationem, sine qua nemo poterit uidere deum. multum enim miror, si eo usque progrediuntur, qui existimant impios uisuros deum et a diabolo uisum deum, ut eos et mundo esse corde et pacem ac sanctificationem cum omnibus sectari adseuerent.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet some, wishing to prove that even the wicked will see God, think that God was seen even by the devil himself, taking in this sense what is written in the book of Job, that the devil also came with the angels into the presence of God. Thus the further question arises how it was said, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and, “Pursue peace with all, and holiness, without which no one will be able to see God.” For I would be very surprised if those who think that the wicked will see God and that God was seen by the devil go so far as to assert that they are both pure in heart and pursue peace and holiness with all.

### Scripture references

- Job 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Job 1:6; 2:1. Matt 5:8. Heb 12:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.15 (CSEL 44:287–288; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-1/#p-147-15).

## Letter 147.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-16
- Source: CSEL 44:288
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'He who has seen me has seen the Father' affirms the unity of substance of Father and Son; as God, neither has been seen by men, though the Son was seen as man.

### Latin text

Nam quod dominus ait: Qui me uidit, uidit et patrem, potest paulo attentius consideratum non uideri esse contrarium ei, quod dixit: Deum nemo uidit umquam. neque enim dixit: (Quia me uidistis, uidistis et patrem), sed dicendo: Qui me uidit, uidit et patrem ostendere uoluit unitatem substantiae patris et filii, ne in aliquo inter se putarentur esse dissimiles. ac per hoc, quoniam uerum dictum est: Qui me uidit, uidit et patrem, profecto, quoniam deum nemo hominum uidit umquam, nec patrem quisquam putandus est uidisse nec filium, secundum quod deus est filius et cum patre unus deus; nam secundum id, quod homo est, utique in terra uisus est et cum hominibus conuersatus est.

### English translation (Claude)

For what the Lord said, “He who has seen me has seen the Father,” can, when considered a little more attentively, be seen not to be contrary to what he said: “No one has ever seen God.” For he did not say, “Because you have seen me, you have seen the Father”; but by saying, “He who has seen me has seen the Father,” he wished to show the unity of substance of the Father and the Son, so that they should not be thought unlike each other in anything. And so, since it was truly said, “He who has seen me has seen the Father,” surely, since no one of men has ever seen God, no one is to be thought to have seen either the Father or the Son, insofar as the Son is God and one God with the Father; for insofar as he is man, he was certainly seen on earth and lived among men.

### Scripture references

- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Bar 3:38 (Baruch): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- John 14:9; John 1:18. “Lived among men”: Bar 3:38 (37 in the Vulgate), commonly applied to Christ.
- Trinitarian passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.16 (CSEL 44:288; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-16).

## Letter 147.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-17
- Source: CSEL 44:288–289
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine introduces a long passage from Ambrose's commentary on Luke concerning the vision of God.

### Latin text

Sed magna quaestio est, quo modo non sit contrarium, quia tot antiqui uiderunt deum, si deum nemo uidit umquam, quem nemo hominum uidit nec uidere potest. uides, quam difficilem mihi proposueris quaestionem, unde me aliquid prolixe copioseque scribere uoluisti ex occasione breuis epistulae meae, quae tibi uisa est diligentius et uberius explicanda. uisne ergo adtendere, quae apud alios interim comperi diuinarum scripturarum egregios tractatores, quid de uisione dei senserint, ne forte sufficiant desiderio tuo, quamuis ea forsitan noueris? pauca ergo ista adtende, si placet. cum euangelium exponens beatus Ambrosius, Mediolanensis episcopus, uenisset ad eum locum, ubi angelus apparuit in templo Zachariae sacerdoti, ex hac occasione uide quanta et qualia de dei etiam uisione disseruit.

### English translation (Claude)

But it is a great question how it is not contradictory that so many of the ancients saw God, if no one has ever seen God, whom no one of men has seen or can see. You see how difficult a question you have put to me, on which you wanted me to write something long and full, on the occasion of a short letter of mine which seemed to you to need a more careful and ample explanation. Will you, then, attend meanwhile to what I have found in other distinguished commentators on the divine Scriptures as to what they thought about the vision of God, in case it should satisfy your desire, although perhaps you know it already? Attend, then, if you please, to these few things. When blessed Ambrose, bishop of Milan, expounding the Gospel, came to the place where an angel appeared in the temple to Zechariah the priest, see how much and what kind of things he discussed on this occasion about the vision of God as well.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The short letter is Letter 92 to Italica. The angel and Zechariah: Luke 1:11. The passage of Ambrose quoted next is his Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 1.24–27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.17 (CSEL 44:288–289; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-17).

## Letter 147.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-18
- Source: CSEL 44:289–292
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Ambrose: God is seen only when and in the form he wills, not in his nature; in the resurrection only the pure in heart will see him, by the mind and not the eyes.

### Latin text

Non inmerito, inquit, angelus uidetur in templo, quia ueri sacerdotis iam nuntiabatur aduentus et caeleste sacrificium parabatur, in quo angeli ministrarent. et bene apparuisse dicitur ei, qui eum repente conspexit. hoc specialiter aut de angelis aut de deo scriptura diuina tenere consueuit, ut, quod non potest praeuideri, apparere dicatur. sic enim habes: Apparuit deus Abrahae ad ilicem Mambre; nam qui ante non praesentitur, sed repentino uidetur aspectu, apparere memoratur. non enim similiter sensibilia uidentur et is, cuius in uoluntate situm est uideri et cuius naturae est non uideri, uoluntatis uideri. nam si non uult, non uidetur; si uult, uidetur. apparuit enim deus Abrahae, quia uoluit; aliis, quia noluit, non apparuit. uisum est etiam Stephano, cum lapidaretur a populo, aperiri caelum, uisus est etiam Iesus stans ad dexteram dei et non est uisus a populo; uidit Esaias dominum sabaoth, sed alius uidere non potuit, quia, cui placuit, apparuit. et quid de hominibus loquimur, cum etiam de ipsis caelestibus uirtutibus et potestatibus legerimus quia: Deum nemo uidit umquam? et addidit, quod ultra caelestes est potestates: Unigenitus filius, qui est in sinu patris, ipse narrauit. aut adquiescatur igitur necesse est, si deum patrem nemo uidit umquam, filium uisum esse in ueteri testamento et desinant haeretici ex uirgine ei principium dare, qui antequam nasceretur ex uirgine, uidebatur, aut certe refelli non potest uel patrem uel filium uel certe spiritum sanctum, si tamen est sancti spiritus uisio, ea specie uideri, quam uoluntas elegerit, non natura formauerit, quoniam spiritum quoque uisum accepimus in columba. et ideo deum nemo uidit umquam, quia eam, quae in deo habitat, plenitudinem diuinitatis nemo conspexit, nemo mente aut oculis comprehendit; uidit enim ad utrumque referendum est denique cum additur: Unigenitus filius ipse narrauit, mentium magis quam oculorum uisio declaratur. species enim uidetur, uirtus uero narratur; illa oculis, haec mente comprehenditur. sed quid de trinitate dicam? Seraphin, quando uoluit, apparuit et uocem eius Esaias solus audiuit. apparuit angelus et nunc praesto est, sed non uidetur. neque enim in potestate nostra est uidere sed in potestate illius apparere. tamen, etsi potestas non est uidendi, est gratia promerendi, ut uidere possimus. et ideo, qui habuit gratiam, meruit copiam; nos copiam non meremur, quia deum uidendi gratiam non habemus. et quid mirum, si in praesenti saeculo, nisi quando uult, dominus non uidetur? in ipsa quoque resurrectione non facile est deum uidere nisi his, qui corde sint mundo, et ideo: Beati mundo corde; ipsi enim deum uidebunt. quantos beatos iam numerauerat et tamen uidendi his deum non promiserat facultatem! si ergo hi, qui mundo sunt corde, deum uidebunt, utique alii non uidebunt; neque enim indigni deum uidebunt neque is, qui deum uidere noluerit, potest deum uidere. nec in loco deus uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis deus quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu; et, cum absens putatur, uidetur et, cum praesens est, non uidetur. denique nec apostoli omnes Christum uidebant et ideo ait: Tanto tempore uobiscum sum et adhuc me non cognouistis. qui enim cognouit, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, et supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi, uidit et Christum, uidit et patrem. nos enim iam secundum carnem non nouimus Christum sed secundum spiritum. spiritus enim ante faciem nostram Christus dominus, qui nos in omnem plenitudinem dei misericordia sua implere dignetur, ut uideri possit a nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

“Not without reason,” he says, “is the angel seen in the temple, because the coming of the true priest was now being announced and the heavenly sacrifice was being prepared, at which angels would minister. And he is well said to have appeared to one who saw him suddenly. Divine Scripture is accustomed to keep this usage especially of angels or of God, that what cannot be foreseen is said to appear. For thus you have: ‘God appeared to Abraham at the oak of Mamre’; for one who is not perceived beforehand but is seen by a sudden sight is said to appear. For sensible things are not seen in the same way as he in whose will it lies to be seen, and whose nature it is not to be seen, but whose will it is to be seen. For if he does not will it, he is not seen; if he wills it, he is seen. For God appeared to Abraham because he willed to; to others, because he did not will to, he did not appear. Stephen also, when he was being stoned by the people, saw heaven opened; Jesus too was seen standing at the right hand of God, and he was not seen by the people. Isaiah saw the Lord of hosts, but another could not see him, because he appeared to whom he pleased. And why do we speak of men, when even of the heavenly virtues and powers themselves we have read that ‘No one has ever seen God’? And he added what is beyond the heavenly powers: ‘The only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared him.’ Either, then, it must be accepted, if no one has ever seen God the Father, that the Son was seen in the Old Testament, and let the heretics stop giving a beginning from the virgin to him who was seen before he was born of the virgin; or at least it cannot be refuted that the Father, or the Son, or certainly the Holy Spirit, if there is indeed a vision of the Holy Spirit, is seen in that form which the will has chosen, not which nature has formed; since we have learned that the Spirit too was seen in a dove. And so no one has ever seen God, because no one has beheld that fullness of the Godhead that dwells in God, no one has grasped it with mind or eyes; for ‘seen’ must be referred to both. Then, when it is added, ‘The only-begotten Son, he has declared him,’ a vision of minds rather than of eyes is set forth. For a form is seen, but a power is declared; the one is grasped by the eyes, the other by the mind. But what shall I say of the Trinity? A seraph appeared when he willed, and Isaiah alone heard his voice. An angel appeared, and he is present even now, but he is not seen. For it is not in our power to see, but in his power to appear. Yet, even if we have no power of seeing, there is the grace of deserving, so that we may be able to see. And so he who had grace merited the abundance; we do not merit the abundance, because we do not have the grace of seeing God. And what wonder if in the present age the Lord is not seen except when he wills? In the resurrection itself, too, it is not easy to see God except for those who are pure in heart; and so: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’ How many had he already numbered as blessed, and yet he had not promised them the ability to see God! If, then, those who are pure in heart will see God, others certainly will not see him; for neither will the unworthy see God, nor can he who has not wished to see God see God. Nor is God seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is God sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by his gait; and when he is thought absent, he is seen, and when he is present, he is not seen. Then, not all the apostles saw Christ, and so he says: ‘Have I been with you so long, and you have not yet known me?’ For whoever has known what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, has seen both Christ and the Father. For we no longer know Christ according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. For the Spirit before our face is Christ the Lord, who in his mercy may deign to fill us with all the fullness of God, so that he may be seen by us.”

### Scripture references

- Gen 18:1: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 7:55: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 7:56: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 6:1: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 6:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:16: allusion, high confidence
- Lam 4:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ambrose, Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 1.24–27, quoted at length.
- Scripture within the quotation: Gen 18:1 (Mamre); Acts 7:55–56 (Stephen); Isa 6:1; John 1:18; the dove: Matt 3:16; fullness of the Godhead: Col 2:9; seraph: Isa 6:6–7; Matt 5:8; John 14:9; Eph 3:18–19; 2 Cor 5:16; “the Spirit before our face is Christ the Lord”: Lam 4:20 (Latin/Greek version).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.18 (CSEL 44:289–292; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-18).

## Letter 147.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-19
- Source: CSEL 44:292–293
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that God appears in forms chosen by his will while his nature stays hidden; Ambrose's wording guards against both Photinians and Arians and against making God mutable.

### Latin text

Si haec uerba intellegis, quid restat, quod a me amplius requiratur, cum iam illa, quae difficilis uidebatur, soluta sit quaestio? discretum est quippe, quo modo dictum sit: Deum nemo uidit umquam, et quo modo deum iusti antiqui uiderint, si illud propterea dictum est, quoniam deus natura est inuisibilis, illi autem ideo uiderunt, quicumque deum uiderunt, quia, cui uoluerit, sicut uoluerit, apparet ea specie, quam uoluntas elegerit, etiam latente natura. nam si, patres quando deum uiderunt, ipsa illis natura eius apparuit, quamuis, si noluisset, utique non apparuisset, quo modo deum nemo uidit umquam, cum eo uolente ipsa eius a tot patribus natura conspecta sit? quod si dicitur filius a patribus uisus, ut de deo patre dictum accipiatur, quod eum nemo umquam uiderit, non quidem amisit occasionem Ambrosius, ut hinc quosdam haereticos redargueret, id est Photinianos, qui principium filio dei ex utero uirginis tribuunt nec uolunt credere, quod et antea fuerit. sed quia uidebat alios, id est Arrianos perniciosius insidiantes, quorum procul dubio error adstruitur, si patris natura inuisibilis, filii uero uisibilis creditur, utriusque unam pariterque inuisibilem adseruit esse naturam adiungens etiam spiritus sancti. quod breuiter quidem sed admirabiliter intimauit, ubi secutus ait: Aut certe refelli non potest uel patrem uel filium uel certe spiritum sanctum, si tamen est sancti spiritus uisio, ea specie uideri, quam uoluntas elegerit, non natura formauerit potuit dicere non natura monstrauerit, sed maluit dicere formauerit>, ne ipsam speciem, in qua deus elegit apparere, de sua natura formare putaretur et ex hoc utique conuinceretur conuertibilis esse mutabilisque substantia, quod ipse deus a fide piorum misericors et benignus auerterit!

### English translation (Claude)

If you understand these words, what remains to be asked further of me, since the question that seemed difficult has already been solved? For it has been distinguished how it was said, “No one has ever seen God,” and how the righteous of old saw God: the former was said because God is by nature invisible, while those who saw God saw him because he appears to whom he wills, as he wills, in the form that his will has chosen, while his nature remains hidden. For if, when the fathers saw God, his very nature appeared to them (although, if he had not willed it, it certainly would not have appeared), how has no one ever seen God, when by his will his very nature was beheld by so many fathers? But if it is said that the Son was seen by the fathers, so that “no one has ever seen him” is understood as said of God the Father, Ambrose did not indeed miss the opportunity to refute from this certain heretics, namely the Photinians, who ascribe to the Son of God a beginning from the virgin’s womb and will not believe that he existed before. But because he saw others, namely the Arians, lying in wait more dangerously, whose error would without doubt be supported if the Father’s nature were believed invisible and the Son’s visible, he asserted that the nature of both is one and equally invisible, adding also that of the Holy Spirit. This he conveyed briefly but admirably where he went on to say: “Or at least it cannot be refuted that the Father, or the Son, or certainly the Holy Spirit, if there is indeed a vision of the Holy Spirit, is seen in that form which the will has chosen, not which nature has formed.” He could have said “not which nature has shown,” but he preferred to say “has formed,” so that God should not be thought to form from his own nature the very form in which he chose to appear, and from this be convicted of being a changeable and mutable substance: a thought which may God himself, merciful and kind, turn away from the faith of the godly!

### Scripture references

- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Photinians: followers of Photinus of Sirmium, who held that the Son began to exist at his birth from Mary. Arians: who held the Son a creature; Augustine’s point is that a visible Son and invisible Father would imply different natures.
- Trinitarian and anti-heretical passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.19 (CSEL 44:292–293; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-19).

## Letter 147.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-20
- Source: CSEL 44:293–295
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The godly long to see God not in the forms he assumes but in his own substance, as Moses asked; this is promised for the next life, when we shall see him as he is.

### Latin text

Inuisibilis est igitur natura deus non tantum pater sed et ipsa trinitas, unus deus, et quia non tantum inuisibilis uerum etiam incommutabilis, sic apparet, quibus uoluerit, in qua uoluerit specie, ut apud eum integra maneat eius inuisibilis incommutabilisque natura. desiderium autem ueraciter piorum, quo uidere deum cupiunt et inhianter ardescunt, non, opinor, in eam speciem contuendam flagrat, qua, ut uult, apparet, quod ipse non est, sed in eam substantiam, qua ipse est, quod est. huius enim desiderii sui flammam sanctus Moyses, fidelis famulus eius, ostendit, ubi ait deo, cum quo ut amicus facie ad faciem loquebatur: Si inueni gratiam ante te, ostende mihi temet ipsum. quid ergo? ille non erat ipse? si non esset ipse, non ei diceret ostende mihi temet ipsum, sed ostende mihi deum, et tamen, si eius naturam substantiamque conspiceret, multo minus diceret ostende mihi temet ipsum. ipse ergo erat in ea specie, qua apparere uoluerat, non autem ipse apparebat in natura propria, quam Moyses uidere cupiebat; ea quippe promittitur sanctis in alia uita. unde, quod responsum est Moysi, uerum est, quia nemo potest faciem dei uidere et uiuere, id est nemo potest eum in hac uita uiuens uidere, sicuti est. nam multi uiderunt, sed quod uoluntas elegit, non quod natura formauit, et illud, quod Iohannes ait, si recte intellegitur: Dilectissimi, filii dei sumus et nondum apparuit, quid erimus; scimus, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est, non sicut eum homines uiderunt, quando uoluit, in specie, qua uoluit, non in natura, qua in semet ipso, etiam cum uideretur, latuit, sed sicut est, quod ab eo petebatur, cum ei diceretur: Ostende mihi temet ipsum ab eo, qui cum illo facie ad faciem loquebatur, non quia dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed uel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit.

### English translation (Claude)

God, then, is by nature invisible, not only the Father but the Trinity itself, one God; and because he is not only invisible but also unchangeable, he appears to whom he wills in the form he wills in such a way that his invisible and unchangeable nature remains entire in him. But the desire of the truly godly, by which they long to see God and burn with eager yearning, does not, I think, burn to behold that form in which he appears as he wills, which he himself is not, but that substance by which he is what he is. For holy Moses, his faithful servant, showed the flame of this desire of his when he said to God, with whom he spoke face to face as a friend: “If I have found grace before you, show me yourself.” What then? Was that not he himself? If it were not he himself, he would not say to him, “Show me yourself,” but “Show me God”; and yet, if he were beholding his nature and substance, he would much less say, “Show me yourself.” He himself, then, was in that form in which he had willed to appear, but he did not appear himself in his own nature, which Moses longed to see; for that is promised to the saints in another life. Hence what was answered to Moses is true: that no one can see the face of God and live, that is, no one living in this life can see him as he is. For many have seen, but what the will chose, not what nature formed. And what John says, if rightly understood: “Beloved, we are children of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is”: not as men saw him when he willed, in the form he willed, not in the nature in which he lay hidden in himself even when he was seen, but as he is, which is what was asked of him when he was told, “Show me yourself,” by the one who spoke with him face to face; not that anyone has ever grasped the fullness of God, not only with the eyes of the body but even with the mind itself.

### Scripture references

- Exod 33:11: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 33:13: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:20: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Exod 33:11, 13 (Latin: “show me yourself”), 20; 1 John 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.20 (CSEL 44:293–295; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-20).

## Letter 147.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-21
- Source: CSEL 44:295
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Seeing something differs from comprehending it wholly, whether by the mind (one's own will) or by the eyes (the outline of a ring).

### Latin text

Aliud est enim uidere, aliud est totum uidendo comprehendere, quando quidem id uidetur, quod praesens utcumque sentitur, totum autem comprehenditur uidendo, quod ita uidetur, ut nihil eius lateat uidentem, aut cuius fines circumspici possunt, sicut te nihil latet praesentis uoluntatis tuae, circumspicere autem potes finis anuli tui. exempli gratia duo posui, quorum alterum ad mentis obtutum, alterum ad corporales oculos pertinet; uisus enim, sicut ille ait, ad utrumque referendus est, id est et ad oculos et ad mentem.

### English translation (Claude)

For it is one thing to see, another to grasp the whole by seeing. Something is seen when it is perceived as present in any way at all; but the whole is grasped by seeing when it is so seen that nothing of it is hidden from the one seeing, or when its boundaries can be surveyed: as nothing of your present will is hidden from you, while you can survey the boundaries of your ring. I have given two examples, one of which belongs to the gaze of the mind and the other to the bodily eyes; for sight, as he says, must be referred to both, that is, to the eyes and to the mind.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.21 (CSEL 44:295; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-21).

## Letter 147.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-22
- Source: CSEL 44:295–297
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If angels see God as he is, we shall too when made equal to them; Ambrose's 'form is seen, power is declared' points to an ineffable vision of the mind.

### Latin text

Porro si propterea deum nemo uidit umquam, quia, sicut ait disputator, cuius uerba consideramus, plenitudinem diuinitatis eius nemo conspexit, nemo mente aut oculis comprehendit; (uidit) enim ad utrumque referendum est, restat inquirere, quo modo angeli deum uideant, propter illud, quod ex euangelio commemoraui: Angeli eorum semper uident faciem patris mei. si enim et ipsis non sicuti est, sed latente sua natura in specie, qua uoluerit, apparet, magis magisque requirendum est, quo modo eum nos uidebimus, sicuti est et sicut Moyses desiderauit, cum peteret, ut deus, qui in conspectu eius erat, ostenderet illi semet ipsum. hoc enim nobis summum praemium in resurrectione promittitur, quod erimus aequales angelis dei, ac per hoc, si nec ipsi eum uident, sicuti est, quo modo nos ita uisuri sumus, cum eis aequales in resurrectione facti fuerimus? sed uide, quid consequenter dicat noster Ambrosius: Denique, inquit, cum additur: Unigenitus filius ipse narrauit, mentium magis quam oculorum uisio declaratur. species enim uidetur, uirtus uero narratur; illa oculis, haec mente comprehenditur. qui paulo ante dixerat uisionem ad utrumque referendam, nunc eam non menti sed oculis dedit non, ut opinor, neglegenter sua uerba respiciens, sed quia usitatius in loquendo solemus oculis adtribuere uisionem sicut speciem corpori. nam et hanc mos loquendi crebrius usurpat in rebus, quae locis continentur uarianturque coloribus. sed si nulla species esset mente contuenda, non diceretur ille speciosus forma prae filiis hominum. neque enim hoc secundum carnem dictum est et non secundum speciem spiritalem. dicitur ergo et species pertinens ad mentis obtutum; sed quia usitatius in corporibus dicitur uel in similitudinibus corporum, ideo dixit: Species uidetur, uirtus uero narratur; illa oculis, haec mente comprehenditur. proinde narrante unigenito, qui est in sinu patris, narratione ineffabili creatura rationalis munda et sancta impletur dei uisione ineffabili, quam tunc consequemur, cum aequales angelis facti fuerimus, quia, sicut uidentur ista uisibilia corporis sensibus nota, deum nemo uidit umquam, quoniam, si aliquando eo modo uisus est, non sicut ista natura uidetur, sed uoluntate uisus est specie, qua uoluit, apparens latente natura atque in se incommutabiliter permanente. eo autem modo, quo uidetur, sicuti est, nunc fortasse uidetur a quibusdam angelis, a nobis autem tunc ita uidebitur, cum eis facti fuerimus aequales.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, if no one has ever seen God because, as the writer whose words we are considering says, “no one has beheld the fullness of his Godhead, no one has grasped it with mind or eyes; for ‘seen’ must be referred to both,” it remains to inquire how the angels see God, because of what I quoted from the Gospel: “Their angels always see the face of my Father.” For if he appears to them too not as he is, but in the form he wills while his nature is hidden, it must be asked all the more how we shall see him as he is, and as Moses desired when he asked that God, who was in his sight, should show him himself. For this is promised to us as the highest reward in the resurrection, that we shall be equal to the angels of God; and so, if even they do not see him as he is, how are we going to see him so when we have been made equal to them in the resurrection? But see what our Ambrose says next: “Then,” he says, “when it is added, ‘The only-begotten Son, he has declared him,’ a vision of minds rather than of eyes is set forth. For a form is seen, but a power is declared; the one is grasped by the eyes, the other by the mind.” He who had said a little before that vision must be referred to both now assigned it not to the mind but to the eyes; not, I think, from carelessness about his own words, but because in speaking we more commonly attribute vision to the eyes, as form to the body. For common usage applies this word more often to things contained in places and varied by colors. But if there were no form to be beheld by the mind, it would not be said, “He is beautiful in form above the sons of men”; for this was not said according to the flesh rather than according to a spiritual form. Form, then, is also spoken of as belonging to the gaze of the mind; but because it is more commonly said of bodies or of likenesses of bodies, he therefore said: “A form is seen, but a power is declared; the one is grasped by the eyes, the other by the mind.” Accordingly, as the only-begotten, who is in the bosom of the Father, declares him by an ineffable declaration, the rational creature, pure and holy, is filled with the ineffable vision of God, which we shall attain when we have been made equal to the angels. For no one has ever seen God in the way these visible things known to the bodily senses are seen; since, if he was ever seen in that way, he was not seen as such a nature is seen, but by his will, appearing in the form he willed, while his nature was hidden and remained unchangeably in itself. But in the way in which he is seen as he is, he is now perhaps seen by some angels, and by us he will be seen so then, when we have been made equal to them.

### Scripture references

- Matt 18:10: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:13: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 20:36: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 45:2 (44:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 18:10; equal to the angels: Luke 20:36 (Matt 22:30); “beautiful in form above the sons of men”: Ps 45:2 (LXX 44:3); John 1:18. The quotations are from Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.22 (CSEL 44:295–297; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-22).

## Letter 147.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-23
- Source: CSEL 44:297–298
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose's 'we lack the grace of seeing God' refers to this age, when God appeared only to a few; in the age to come all who inherit the kingdom will see him.

### Latin text

Deinde cum addidisset, quia nec potestates caelorum sicut Seraphin, nisi cum uolunt et quem ad modum uolunt, uidentur, ut hinc etiam coniceretur, quanta sit inuisibilitas trinitatis: Tamen), inquit, etsi potestas non est uidendi, est gratia promerendi, ut uidere possimus. et ideo, qui habuit gratiam, meruit copiam; nos copiam non meremur, quia deum uidendi gratiam non habemus. his utique uerbis, qui non sua docet, sed euangelium exponit, non hoc uoluit intellegi, quod quidam eorum uidebunt deum, quidam uero non uidebunt, quibus credentibus dedit potestatem filios dei fieri, cum ad eos omnes pertineat, quod dictum est: Videbimus eum sicuti est, sed dicendo (nos copiam non meremur, quia deum uidendi gratiam non habemus) de hoc saeculo se loqui significauit, ubi quibusdam deus licet non in sua natura, sed in qua uoluit specie, dignatus est apparere sicut Abrahae, sicut Esaiae aliisque similibus; ceteris uero innumerabilibus quamuis ad suum populum et hereditatem aeternam pertinentibus nulla uel tali specie se demonstrat. in futuro autem saeculo, qui regnum accepturi sunt, quod eis ab initio praeparatum est, omnes eum corde mundo uidebunt nec in illo regno nisi tales erunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Then, having added that not even the powers of heaven, such as the seraphim, are seen except when they will and as they will, so that from this one might infer how great is the invisibility of the Trinity, he says: “Yet, even if we have no power of seeing, there is the grace of deserving, so that we may be able to see. And so he who had grace merited the abundance; we do not merit the abundance, because we do not have the grace of seeing God.” By these words he, who teaches not his own ideas but expounds the Gospel, did not wish it to be understood that some of those to whom, when they believed, he gave power to become children of God will see God and some will not, since what was said, “We shall see him as he is,” applies to them all. But by saying, “We do not merit the abundance, because we do not have the grace of seeing God,” he indicated that he was speaking of this age, in which God, though not in his own nature but in the form he willed, deigned to appear to some, as to Abraham, as to Isaiah, and to others like them; but to the rest, countless though they are and belonging to his people and eternal inheritance, he shows himself in no such form. But in the age to come, those who are to receive the kingdom prepared for them from the beginning will all see him with a pure heart, and there will be none but such in that kingdom.

### Scripture references

- John 1:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:34: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Power to become children of God: John 1:12; 1 John 3:2; the kingdom prepared from the beginning: Matt 25:34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.23 (CSEL 44:297–298; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-23).

## Letter 147.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-24
- Source: CSEL 44:298
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose says that only the worthy, the pure in heart, will see God in the resurrection; all will rise, but the wicked to judgment.

### Latin text

Adtende itaque, quid adiungat iam de illo saeculo dicere incipiens: et quid mirum, inquit, <si in praesenti saeculo, nisi quando uult, dominus non uidetur? in ipsa quoque resurrectione non facile est deum uidere nisi eis, qui corde sint mundo, et ideo: Beati mundo corde; ipsi enim deum uidebunt. quantos beatos iam numerauerat et tamen uidendi his deum non promiserat facultatem! si ergo hi, qui mundo sunt corde, deum uidebunt, utique alii non uidebunt; neque enim indigni deum uidebunt neque is, qui deum uidere noluerit, potest deum uidere). cernis, quam circumspecte loquatur iam de his, qui in futuro saeculo uidebunt deum; neque enim omnes, sed qui digni sunt. resurgent enim et digni et indigni regno illo, ubi uidebitur deus, quoniam omnes, qui in monumentis sunt, audient uocem eius et procedent, sed cum magna differentia; nam qui bene fecerunt, in resurrectionem uitae, qui autem male egerunt, in resurrectionem iudicii. hic iudicium poenam aeternam significat, sicut etiam illud dictum est: Qui non credit, iam iudicatus est.

### English translation (Claude)

Notice, then, what he adds, beginning now to speak of that age: “And what wonder,” he says, “if in the present age the Lord is not seen except when he wills? In the resurrection itself, too, it is not easy to see God except for those who are pure in heart; and so: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’ How many had he already numbered as blessed, and yet he had not promised them the ability to see God! If, then, those who are pure in heart will see God, others certainly will not see him; for neither will the unworthy see God, nor can he who has not wished to see God see God.” You see how circumspectly he speaks now of those who will see God in the age to come: not all, but those who are worthy. For both the worthy and the unworthy of that kingdom where God will be seen will rise again, since all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come forth, but with a great difference: those who have done good, to the resurrection of life; those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment. Here judgment means eternal punishment, as was also said: “He who does not believe is judged already.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:28: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:8; John 5:28–29; John 3:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.24 (CSEL 44:298; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-24).

## Letter 147.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-25
- Source: CSEL 44:298–299
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Only the pure in heart see God, so the devil's coming 'into God's sight' in Job means he was seen by God, not that he saw God.

### Latin text

Quod ergo ait sanctus Ambrosius neque is, qui deum uidere noluerit, potest deum uidere quid aliud intellegi uoluit, nisi quia is, qui mundando cordi curam tanta re dignam non uult inpendere, non uult deum uidere? uide proinde, quid adiungat: Nec in loco, inquit, deus uidetur sed mundo corde quid euidentius, quid expressius dici potuit? ab hac igitur uisione diabolus et angeli eius et omnes cum eis impii sine ulla nebula dubitationis exclusi sunt, quoniam mundo corde non sunt. ac per hoc, quod scriptum est in libro Iob uenisse angelos in conspectu dei et uenisse cum eis diabolum, non ideo diabolus deum uidisse credendus est. ipsi enim dicti sunt uenisse in conspectu dei, non deus in conspectu eorum. ueniunt autem in conspectu nostro, quae uidemus, non a quibus uidemur. uenerunt ergo, sicut in multis codicibus legitur, ut adsisterent coram domino, non ut coram ipsis deus. nec opus est in hoc loco inmorari, ut pro uiribus nostris conemur ostendere, quo modo et hoc temporaliter fiat, cum in dei conspectu semper sint omnia.

### English translation (Claude)

When, therefore, holy Ambrose says, “nor can he who has not wished to see God see God,” what else did he mean to be understood but that he who will not spend on cleansing his heart the care that so great a thing deserves does not wish to see God? See, accordingly, what he adds: “Nor is God seen in a place,” he says, “but by a pure heart.” What could have been said more clearly, more expressly? From this vision, then, the devil and his angels and all the wicked with them are excluded without any cloud of doubt, since they are not pure in heart. And so, from what is written in the book of Job, that the angels came into the sight of God and the devil came with them, it is not to be believed on that account that the devil saw God. For they are said to have come into the sight of God, not God into their sight. And those things come into our sight which we see, not those by which we are seen. They came, then, as is read in many manuscripts, to stand before the Lord, not that God should stand before them. Nor is there need to dwell on this passage, to try as far as we can to show how this too happens in time, when all things are always in God’s sight.

### Scripture references

- Job 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Job 1:6; 2:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.25 (CSEL 44:298–299; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-25).

## Letter 147.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-26
- Source: CSEL 44:299–300
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine glosses each phrase of Ambrose's description of the future vision, contrasting it with God's appearances to Abraham, Moses, Jacob, and Adam.

### Latin text

Nunc enim quaeritur, quo modo uideatur deus non ea specie, qua et in isto saeculo quibusdam uoluit apparere, quando non solum cum Abraham aliisque iustis uerum etiam cum Cain fratricida locutus est, sed quo modo uideatur in illo regno, ubi eum filii eius uidebunt, sicuti est. tunc quippe satiabitur in bonis desiderium eorum, quo desiderio flagrabat Moyses, cui loqui ad deum facie ad faciem non sufficiebat et dicebat: Ostende mihi temet ipsum manifeste, ut uideam te, tamquam diceret, quod in psalmo ex eodem desiderio canitur: Satiabor, cum manifestabitur gloria tua; quo desiderio ardebat et Philippus et sic satiari cupiebat dicens: Ostende nobis patrem et sufficit nobis. de hac uisione loquens eius etiam ipse amator et desiderator Ambrosius: Non in loco, inquit, deus uidetur sicut ad ilicem Mambre, sicut in monte Sina sed mundo corde; et sequitur sciens, quid desideret et quid aestuet et quid speret: Nec corporalibus, inquit, oculis deus quaeritur quibus se ostendit Abrahae, Isaac, Iacob et aliis in hoc saeculo, nec circumscribitur uisu propter illud, quod dictum est: Posteriora mea uidebis, nec tactu tenetur, sicut etiam luctatus est cum Iacob, nec auditur affatu, sicut non solum a tot sanctis uerum etiam a diabolo auditus est, nec sentitur incessu sicut aliquando, cum in paradiso deambularet ad uesperam.

### English translation (Claude)

For the question now is how God is seen, not in that form in which he willed to appear to some even in this age, when he spoke not only with Abraham and other righteous men but even with Cain the fratricide, but how he is seen in that kingdom where his children will see him as he is. For then their desire will be satisfied with good things, the desire with which Moses burned, for whom speaking to God face to face was not enough, and who said: “Show me yourself openly, that I may see you”; as if he were saying what is sung in the psalm from the same desire: “I shall be satisfied when your glory is made manifest.” With this desire Philip too was on fire, and longed to be satisfied in this way, saying: “Show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” Speaking of this vision, Ambrose, himself a lover and longer for it, says: “Nor is God seen in a place” (as at the oak of Mamre, as on Mount Sinai) “but by a pure heart”; and he goes on, knowing what he desires, what he yearns for, and what he hopes: “Nor is God sought,” he says, “with bodily eyes” (with which he showed himself to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others in this age), “nor bounded by sight” (because of what was said, “You shall see my back”), “nor held by touch” (as when he wrestled with Jacob), “nor heard by speech” (as he was heard not only by so many saints but even by the devil), “nor perceived by his gait” (as once, when he walked in paradise in the evening).

### Scripture references

- Gen 4:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 103:5 (102:5 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 33:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 17:15 (16:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 14:8: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 18:1: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 33:23: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 32:24: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 3:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cain: Gen 4:9–15; satisfied with good things: Ps 103:5 (LXX 102:5); Exod 33:13 (Latin with “openly”); “I shall be satisfied …”: Ps 17:15 (LXX 16:15); John 14:8; Mamre: Gen 18:1; Sinai: Exod 19; “you shall see my back”: Exod 33:23; Jacob wrestling: Gen 32:24; the devil hearing God: Job 1–2; walking in paradise: Gen 3:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.26 (CSEL 44:299–300; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-26).

## Letter 147.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-27
- Source: CSEL 44:300–302
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Only God can make the mind grasp an invisible reality seen by the pure heart; this vision belongs to the righteous in eternal life, which is to know the one true God.

### Latin text

Vides, quem ad modum uir sanctus enitatur mentes nostras ab omnibus carnis sensibus seuocare, ut aptas faciat ad uidendum deum. et tamen quid agit talis extrinsecus plantator et rigator, nisi intrinsecus operetur, qui dat incrementum, deus? quis enim sine adiutorio spiritus dei cogitare ualeat esse aliquid magisque esse quam omnia, quae per corpus sentiuntur, quod nec in loco uideatur nec quaerendum sit oculis nec audiatur affatu nec tactu teneatur nec sentiatur incessu et uideatur tamen sed corde mundo? neque enim de hac uita ille loquebatur, cum hoc diceret, quando quidem ab hoc saeculo, in quo deus apparuit non sicuti est, sed in specie qua uoluit, quibus uoluit, satis discreuit saeculi futuri uitam discretione apertissima, ubi ait: Et quid mirum, si in praesenti saeculo, nisi quando uult, dominus non uidetur? in ipsa quoque resurrectione non facile est deum uidere nisi his, qui corde sint mundo, et ideo: Beati mundo corde; ipsi enim deum uidebunt. hinc iam de illo saeculo dicere exorsus est, ubi deum uidebunt non omnes, qui resurgent, sed qui resurgent ad uitam aeternam, non indigni, de quibus dictum est: Tollatur impius, ne uideat claritatem domini, sed digni, de qualibus dixit ipse dominus, cum praesens non uideretur: Qui diligit me, mandata mea custodit, et: Qui diligit me, diligetur a patre meo et ego diligam eum et ostendam me ipsum illi, nec hi, quibus dicetur: Ite in ignem aeternum, qui praeparatus est diabolo et angelis eius, sed hi, quibus dicetur: Venite, benedicti patris mei, percipite regnum, quod uobis praeparatum est ab initio mundi. illi quippe ibunt in ambustionem aeternam, iusti autem in uitam aeternam. et quae est uita aeterna, nisi quod ipsa uita alibi dicit: Haec est autem uita aeterna, ut cognoscant te unum deum uerum et, quem misisti, Iesum Christum, sed sic, quo modo promisit ostensurum se ipsum dilectoribus suis cum patre unum deum, non quo modo in hoc saeculo in corpore uisus est a bonis et a malis?

### English translation (Claude)

You see how this holy man strives to call our minds away from all the senses of the flesh, to make them fit to see God. And yet what does such a planter and waterer from outside accomplish, unless God, who gives the growth, works within? For who, without the help of the Spirit of God, could conceive that there is something, and something that is more than all things perceived through the body, which is not seen in a place, nor to be sought with the eyes, nor heard by speech, nor held by touch, nor perceived by gait, and yet is seen, but by a pure heart? For he was not speaking of this life when he said this, since he distinguished clearly enough from this age, in which God has appeared not as he is but in the form he willed to whom he willed, the life of the age to come, by a very plain distinction, where he says: “And what wonder if in the present age the Lord is not seen except when he wills? In the resurrection itself, too, it is not easy to see God except for those who are pure in heart; and so: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’” From here he began to speak of that age, where God will be seen not by all who rise again, but by those who rise to eternal life; not by the unworthy, of whom it was said, “Let the wicked be taken away, that he may not see the glory of the Lord,” but by the worthy, of whom the Lord himself said, when he was present and not seen: “He who loves me keeps my commandments,” and, “He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and show myself to him”; not by those to whom it will be said, “Go into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels,” but by those to whom it will be said, “Come, blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” For the former will go into eternal burning, but the righteous into eternal life. And what is eternal life, but what the Life itself says elsewhere: “And this is eternal life, that they may know you, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent”; but in the way he promised to show himself to those who love him, as one God with the Father, not in the way he was seen in the body in this age by the good and the wicked?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 26:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:15: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:41: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:34: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:46: quotation, high confidence
- John 17:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Planter and waterer: 1 Cor 3:7. “Let the wicked be taken away …”: Isa 26:10 (Latin/Greek version). John 14:21 (with 14:15). Matt 25:41, 34, 46. John 17:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.27 (CSEL 44:300–302; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-27).

## Letter 147.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-28
- Source: CSEL 44:302–303
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: At the judgment the wicked will see Christ in his human form, but only the pure in heart will see him in the form of God, which is why that beatitude alone promises the sight of God.

### Latin text

Et in iudicio enim futuro, quo sic uenturus est, quo modo uisus est iens in caelum, hoc est in eadem forma filii hominis, eandem formam uidebunt, quibus dicturus est: Esuriui et non dedistis mihi manducare, quia et Iudaei uidebunt, in quem pupugerunt, non illam dei formam, in qua non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalem deo. in illa dei forma tunc uidebunt eum, qui uidebunt, sicuti est. nec ideo uidebunt, quia pauperes spiritu in hac uita fuerunt, quia mites, quia lugentes, quia esurientes et sitientes iustitiam, quia misericordes, quia pacifici, quia persecutionem passi propter iustitiam, quamuis et haec omnia idem ipsi sint, sed quia mundo sunt corde. ideo quippe inter illas beatitudines, cum omnia faciant, qui cor mundum habent, non est tamen alicubi positum: Deum uidebunt, nisi ubi dictum est: Beati mundo corde, quoniam mundo corde uidebitur, qui nec in loco uidetur nec oculis corporalibus quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu. deum enim nemo uidit umquam uel in hac uita, sicuti ipse est, uel etiam in angelorum uita, sicut uisibilia ista, quae corporali uisione cernuntur, quia unigenitus filius, qui est in sinu patris, ipse narrauit. unde non ad oculorum corporalium sed ad mentium uisionem dictum est pertinere, quod narrat.

### English translation (Claude)

For at the future judgment too, when he will come in the same way as he was seen going into heaven, that is, in the same form of the Son of Man, that same form will be seen by those to whom he will say, “I was hungry and you did not give me to eat,” since even the Jews will look on him whom they pierced; not that form of God in which he did not think it robbery to be equal with God. In that form of God those will see him then who will see him as he is. And they will see him not because in this life they were poor in spirit, because meek, because mourning, because hungering and thirsting for righteousness, because merciful, because peacemakers, because they suffered persecution for righteousness’ sake (although the same people are all these), but because they are pure in heart. That is why among those beatitudes, though those who have a pure heart do all these things, “they shall see God” is placed nowhere except where it was said, “Blessed are the pure in heart”; for he will be seen by a pure heart who is not seen in a place, nor sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait. For no one has ever seen God, either in this life as he himself is, or even in the life of the angels as these visible things are seen that are perceived by bodily vision; because the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared him. Hence what he declares is said to belong not to the vision of bodily eyes but to that of minds.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:11: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:42: quotation, high confidence
- Zech 12:10: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Coming as he went: Acts 1:11; Matt 25:42; “they will look on him whom they pierced”: Zech 12:10 (John 19:37); “did not think it robbery to be equal with God”: Phil 2:6; the Beatitudes: Matt 5:3–10; John 1:18. The reference to the Jews is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.28 (CSEL 44:302–303; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-28).

## Letter 147.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-29
- Source: CSEL 44:303–304
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is not heard by the ears either; the Son declares him as the inner Word, and God, who fills all things, is seen by the pure mind even when thought absent.

### Latin text

Sed rursus, ne desiderium nostrum a corporis sensu ad alium corporis sensum migraret, hoc est ad aures ab oculis, ideo, cum dixisset: Nec corporalibus oculis deus quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur, addidit etiam: Nec auditur affatu, ut, si possumus, unigenitum filium, qui est in sinu patris, sic intellegamus narrantem, quo modo et uerbum est non sonus auribus instrepens sed imago mentibus innotescens, ut illic interna et ineffabili luce clarescat, quod dictum est: Qui me uidit, uidit et patrem, quod hic Philippo dicebatur, quando uidebat et non uidebat sequitur enim huius uisionis eximius concupitor Ambrosius dicens: Et, cum absens putatur, uidetur et, cum praesens est, non uidetur. non dixit cum absens est sed cum absens putatur; nusquam enim est absens, qui caelum et terram implet nec spatiis includitur paruis magnisue diffunditur, sed ubique totus est et nullo continetur loco. hoc qui excedente mente intellegit, uidet deum, et cum absens putatur; qui autem hoc non potest, oret et agat, ut posse mereatur, nec ad hominem disputatorem pulset, ut, quod non legit, legat, sed ad deum saluatorem, ut, quod non ualet, ualeat. unde autem dixerit: Et, cum praesens est, non uidetur, consequenter aperuit dicens: Denique nec apostoli omnes Christum uidebant et ideo ait: Tanto tempore uobiscum sum et adhuc me non cognouistis. ecce quo modo praesens deus erat et non uidebatur.

### English translation (Claude)

But again, so that our desire might not move from one bodily sense to another bodily sense, that is, from the eyes to the ears, after he had said, “Nor is God sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch,” he added, “nor heard by speech,” so that, if we can, we may understand the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, as declaring him in the way that he is also the Word: not a sound striking the ears but an image making itself known to minds, so that there, in an inner and ineffable light, what was said may shine clear, “He who has seen me has seen the Father,” which was said here to Philip when he both saw and did not see. For Ambrose, that eminent lover of this vision, goes on to say: “And when he is thought absent, he is seen, and when he is present, he is not seen.” He did not say “when he is absent” but “when he is thought absent”; for he is never absent who fills heaven and earth, and is neither enclosed in small spaces nor spread out in large ones, but is everywhere whole and contained in no place. Whoever understands this with a mind rising above itself sees God, even when he is thought absent; but whoever cannot, let him pray and act so that he may deserve to be able, and let him not knock at the door of a human disputant so as to read what he has not read, but at that of God the Savior, so that he may be able to do what he cannot. And why he said, “And when he is present, he is not seen,” he went on to explain, saying: “Then, not all the apostles saw Christ, and so he says: ‘Have I been with you so long, and you have not yet known me?’” See how God was present and was not seen.

### Scripture references

- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- Jer 23:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:18; John 14:9; “fills heaven and earth”: Jer 23:24. The quotations are from Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.29 (CSEL 44:303–304; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-29).

## Letter 147.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-30
- Source: CSEL 44:304–305
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose's 'not all the apostles' may hint at Peter's revelation, though Augustine doubts whether it was a vision or an act of faith.

### Latin text

Sed quare non ausus est dicere denique nec apostoli Christum uidebant, sed ait nec apostoli omnes, tamquam aliqui tunc uiderent ea uisione, in qua ipse et pater unum sunt? an forte illud adtendit, quod, cum Petrus dixisset: Tu es Christus filius dei uiui, responsum accepit: Beatus es, Simon Bar Iona, quia non tibi reuelauit caro et sanguis sed pater meus, qui in caelis est? quamuis illa reuelatio utrum per fidem tantae rei creditae an per uisionem conspectae facta in eius mente fuerit, non mihi uidetur elucere, cum et ipse Petrus tam paruulum se adhuc illi ostenderit, ut timeret, ne amitteret morientem, quem filium dei uiui, hoc est uitae fontem fuerat paulo ante confessus.

### English translation (Claude)

But why did he not dare to say, “Then, the apostles did not see Christ,” but said, “not all the apostles,” as if some then saw him with that vision in which he and the Father are one? Perhaps he had in mind that, when Peter said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God,” he received the reply: “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven.” Yet whether that revelation was made in his mind by faith in so great a thing believed, or by the vision of a thing beheld, does not seem clear to me, since Peter himself still showed himself so little a child that he feared to lose in death the one whom he had confessed a little before to be the Son of the living God, that is, the fountain of life.

### Scripture references

- John 10:30: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 16:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 16:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 16:22: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- John 10:30; Matt 16:16–17; Peter's fear of Christ's death: Matt 16:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.30 (CSEL 44:304–305; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-30).

## Letter 147.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-31
- Source: CSEL 44:305–306
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A mind may be caught up to see God's substance before death, as Paul was caught up to the third heaven, without contradicting 'no one can see my face and live.'

### Latin text

Deinde potest mouere, quo modo iam ipsa dei substantia uideri potuerit a quibusdam in hac uita positis, propter illud, quod dictum est ad Moysen: Nemo potest faciem meam uidere et uiuere, nisi quia potest humana mens diuinitus rapi ex hac uita ad angelicam uitam, antequam per istam communem mortem carne soluatur. sic enim raptus est, qui audiuit illic ineffabilia uerba, quae non licet homini loqui, ubi usque adeo facta est ab huius uitae sensibus quaedam intentionis auersio, ut, siue corpore siue extra corpus fuerit, id est utrum, sicut solet in uehementiore extasi, mens ab hac uita in illam uitam fuerit alienata manente corporis uinculo, an omnino resolutio facta fuerit, qualis in plena morte contingit, nescire se diceret. ita fit, ut et illud uerum sit, quod dictum est: Nemo potest faciem meam uidere et uiuere, quia necesse est abstrahi ab hac uita mentem, quando in illius ineffabilitatem uisionis adsumitur, et non sit incredibile quibusdam sanctis nondum ita defunctis, ut sepelienda cadauera remanerent, etiam istam excellentiam reuelationis fuisse concessam. quod existimo cogitasse illum, qui noluit dicere nec apostoli Christum uidebant, sed ait nec apostoli omnes Christum uidebant credens quibusdam eorum diuinitatis quoque ipsius uisionem, de qua loquebatur, etiam tunc potuisse donari certe propter beatum Paulum, quia et ipse quamuis nouissimus utique apostolus erat, qui de sua illa ineffabili reuelatione non tacuit.

### English translation (Claude)

Next, it may be asked how the very substance of God could already be seen by some still placed in this life, because of what was said to Moses: “No one can see my face and live”; unless it is because the human mind can be divinely caught up from this life to the angelic life before it is released from the flesh by this common death. For so was he caught up who heard there unspeakable words which it is not lawful for a man to utter, where his attention was so far turned away from the senses of this life that he said he did not know whether he was in the body or out of the body: that is, whether, as usually happens in more intense ecstasy, the mind was carried away from this life into that life while the bond of the body remained, or whether there was a complete release, such as happens in full death. Thus it comes about both that what was said is true, “No one can see my face and live,” because the mind must be withdrawn from this life when it is taken up into the ineffability of that vision; and that it is not incredible that even this excellence of revelation was granted to some saints who had not yet died in such a way that corpses remained to be buried. I think he had this in mind who would not say, “the apostles did not see Christ,” but said, “not all the apostles saw Christ,” believing that to some of them the vision of the Godhead itself, of which he was speaking, could have been given even then; certainly because of blessed Paul, since he too, though the last, was certainly an apostle, and he did not keep silent about that ineffable revelation of his.

### Scripture references

- Exod 33:20: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:2: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Exod 33:20; 2 Cor 12:2–4; the last of the apostles: 1 Cor 15:8–9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.31 (CSEL 44:305–306; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-31).

## Letter 147.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-32
- Source: CSEL 44:306–307
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Moses was told he could not see God's face, but Numbers 12 shows that he later saw the Lord's glory 'not in riddles,' perhaps seeing God as he is.

### Latin text

Quamquam et illi antiquo fidelissimo famulo dei Moysi mirum nisi in hac terra laboraturo populumque illum adhuc recturo concessum est, quod petiuit, ut claritatem domini uideret, cui dixerat: Si inueni gratiam ante te, ostende mihi temet ipsum manifeste. accepit enim in praesentia congruum responsum, quod faciem dei uidere non posset, quam nemo uideret et uiueret, hoc modo deo significante alterius potioris uitae illam esse uisionem. deinde in uerbis dei futurae Christi ecclesiae mysterium figuratum est. gestauit quippe Moyses typum populi Iudaeorum in Christum passum postea credituri; ideo illi dictum est: Cum transiero, posteriora mea uidebis et cetera, quae ibi dicuntur, mirabili sacramento praenuntiante ecclesiam post futuram, unde modo longum est disputare. quod autem dicere institueram, desiderio eius etiam illud, quod petierat, fuisse concessum, in libro numerorum postea demonstratum est, ubi dominus arguit contumaciam sororis ipsius et dicit aliis prophetis in uisione se apparere et in somno, Moysi autem per speciem, non per aenigmata, ubi etiam addidit dicens: Et gloriam domini uidit. quid ergo est, quod eum sic fecit exceptum, nisi forte quia illa contemplatione dignum etiam tunc habuit populi sui talem rectorem et ministrum in tota domo sua fidelem, ut, quem ad modum concupiuerat, uideret deum, sicuti est, quae contemplatio cunctis filiis in fine promittitur?

### English translation (Claude)

And yet it would be surprising if to Moses too, that faithful servant of God of old, who was still to labor on this earth and still to rule that people, it was not granted, as he asked, to see the glory of the Lord, to whom he had said: “If I have found grace before you, show me yourself openly.” For he received at the time a fitting answer, that he could not see God’s face, which no one could see and live; God thus indicating that this vision belongs to another, better life. Then in God’s words the mystery of the future Church of Christ was figured. For Moses bore the type of the Jewish people who were later to believe in Christ after his passion; that is why he was told, “When I have passed by, you shall see my back,” and the rest that is said there, a wonderful sacrament foretelling the Church that was to be, which it would take long to discuss now. But what I had set out to say, that in response to his desire even what he had asked was granted, is shown later in the book of Numbers, where the Lord rebukes the insolence of his sister and says that to other prophets he appears in a vision and in sleep, but to Moses in clear form and not in riddles, adding: “And he saw the glory of the Lord.” What, then, made him such an exception, unless perhaps that God already then held such a ruler of his people, faithful as a servant in all his house, worthy of that contemplation, so that he saw God as he is, as he had desired, the contemplation that is promised to all his children at the end?

### Scripture references

- Exod 33:13: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:20: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 33:23: quotation, high confidence
- Num 12:6: allusion, high confidence
- Num 12:8: quotation, high confidence
- Num 12:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Exod 33:13, 20, 23 (Latin: “show me yourself openly”); Num 12:6–8 (Latin: “and he saw the glory of the Lord”); faithful in all his house: Num 12:7 (Heb 3:2, 5). The typology of Moses and the Jewish people is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.32 (CSEL 44:306–307; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-32).

## Letter 147.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-33
- Source: CSEL 44:307
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose supports his remark with Christ's words to Philip and names those who see God: those who know the breadth, length, height, and depth of Christ's love.

### Latin text

Ista credo considerans uir ille sanctus, cuius uerba tractamus, nec apostoli, inquit, omnes Christum uidebant, quoniam forte aliqui eorum etiam ipso tempore uiderant secundum ista, quae dixi. ut autem probaret, quod dixit, quia non omnes uidebant, continuo subiecit: Et ideo ait: Tanto tempore uobiscum sum et adhuc me non cognouistis. deinde subiungens, a qualibus deus uideatur illa contemplatione, sicuti est: Qui enim cognouit, inquit, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, et supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi, uidit et Christum, uidit et patrem.

### English translation (Claude)

Considering these things, I believe, that holy man whose words we are treating said, “not all the apostles saw Christ,” since perhaps some of them had seen him even at that time, in the way I have described. And to prove what he said, that not all saw him, he added at once: “And so he says: ‘Have I been with you so long, and you have not yet known me?’” Then, adding by whom God is seen in that contemplation as he is, he says: “For whoever has known what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, has seen both Christ and the Father.”

### Scripture references

- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 14:9; Eph 3:18–19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.33 (CSEL 44:307; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-16/#p-147-33).

## Letter 147.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-34
- Source: CSEL 44:307–308
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the breadth, length, height, and depth of Ephesians 3 as love's works, perseverance, hope, and God's hidden judgments, and maps them on the cross.

### Latin text

Ego haec uerba apostoli Pauli sic intellegere soleo: in latitudine bona opera caritatis, in longitudine perseuerantiam usque in finem, in altitudine spem caelestium praemiorum, in profundo inscrutabilia iudicia dei, unde ista gratia in homines uenit, et hunc intellectum coaptare etiam sacramento crucis, ut in latitudine accipiatur transuersum lignum, quo extenduntur manus, propter operum significationem; in longitudine ab ipso usque in terram, ubi totum corpus crucifixum stare uidetur, quod significat persistere, hoc est longanimiter permanere; in altitudine ab ipso transuerso ligno sursum uersus, quod ad caput eminet, propter expectationem supernorum, ne illa opera bona atque in eis perseuerantia propter beneficia dei terrena ac temporalia facienda credantur sed potius propter illud, quod desuper sempiternum sperat fides, quae per dilectionem operatur; in profundo autem pars illa ligni, quae in terrae abdito defixa latet, sed inde consurgit omne illud, quod eminet, sicut ex occulta dei uoluntate uocatur homo ad participationem tantae gratiae alius sic alius autem sic; supereminentem uero scientiae caritatem Christi eam profecto, ubi pax illa est, quae praecellit omnem intellectum. sed siue hoc in istis apostolicis uerbis etiam ille senserit euangelicus disputator siue aliud aliquid fortasse congruentius, uides tamen etiam hoc, ni fallor, a regula fidei non abhorrere.

### English translation (Claude)

I usually understand these words of the apostle Paul in this way: in the breadth, the good works of love; in the length, perseverance to the end; in the height, the hope of heavenly rewards; in the depth, the unsearchable judgments of God, from which this grace comes to men. I also fit this understanding to the sacrament of the cross: in the breadth is taken the crossbeam on which the hands are stretched out, signifying works; in the length, the part from the crossbeam down to the ground, where the whole crucified body is seen to stand, which signifies persisting, that is, remaining with long-suffering; in the height, the part from the crossbeam upward that rises to the head, signifying the expectation of things above, so that those good works and perseverance in them may not be thought to be done for the sake of God’s earthly and temporal benefits, but rather for the eternal thing above which faith, working through love, hopes for; and in the depth, that part of the wood which is fixed and hidden in the secret of the earth, but from which rises all that stands out, just as by the hidden will of God a man is called to share in so great a grace, one in this way and another in that; and the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, surely that love where there is the peace that surpasses all understanding. But whether that expounder of the Gospel also took this sense from these apostolic words, or perhaps something more fitting, you see, unless I am mistaken, that this too is not contrary to the rule of faith.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:18: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 4:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 3:18–19; unsearchable judgments: Rom 11:33; faith working through love: Gal 5:6; the peace that surpasses all understanding: Phil 4:7. Augustine gives the same interpretation of the cross elsewhere (e.g. Letter 140; On Christian Teaching 2.41.62).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.34 (CSEL 44:307–308; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-34).

## Letter 147.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-35
- Source: CSEL 44:308–309
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose's 'we know Christ according to the Spirit' refers to the knowledge of faith now; the vision of God as he is lies in the future, as his closing prayer shows.

### Latin text

Unde autem nunc agimus propter contuitum spiritalem, cum dixisset: Qui cognouit, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, et supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi, uidit et Christum, uidit et patrem, ne alicui tardissimo de corporali uisione dicere uideretur, nos enim, inquit, iam secundum carnem non nouimus Christum sed secundum spiritum. spiritus enim ante faciem nostram Christus dominus. quod ait hoc loco (nouimus), secundum fidem dixit, quae nunc est, non secundum contemplationem, quae tunc erit, quia et illud nouimus, quicquid fide non ficta etiamsi nondum per speciem contuendo iam tamen inconcusse credendo retinemus. denique cum dixisset iam non se secundum carnem Christum nosse, sicut apostolus ait, et addidisset testimonium de propheta spiritus enim ante faciem nostram Christus dominus, continuo subiecit: Qui nos in omnem plenitudinem dei misericordia sua implere dignetur, ut uideri possit a nobis. certe manifestum est, quod illam notitiam, ubi dixerat nouimus, ex fide posuit, ex qua modo iustus uiuit, non ex contemplatione, qua deum uidebimus, sicuti est. hanc enim sibi et nobis consequenter optauit futuramque significauit dicendo: Qui nos in omnem plenitudinem dei misericordia sua implere dignetur, ut uideri possit a nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

But to return to what we are now discussing, namely spiritual contemplation: when he had said, “Whoever has known what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, has seen both Christ and the Father,” so that he might not seem to some very slow person to be speaking of bodily vision, he says: “For we no longer know Christ according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. For the Spirit before our face is Christ the Lord.” What he says here, “we know,” he said according to the faith that exists now, not according to the contemplation that will exist then; for we also know whatever we hold by faith unfeigned, even if not yet beholding it in clear sight, yet already believing it unshakeably. Then, when he had said that he no longer knew Christ according to the flesh, as the apostle says, and had added the testimony from the prophet, “For the Spirit before our face is Christ the Lord,” he went on at once: “who in his mercy may deign to fill us with all the fullness of God, so that he may be seen by us.” Certainly it is clear that the knowledge he spoke of where he said “we know” he placed in faith, by which the righteous now lives, not in the contemplation by which we shall see God as he is. For this he went on to wish for himself and for us, and showed it to be in the future, by saying, “who in his mercy may deign to fill us with all the fullness of God, so that he may be seen by us.”

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Lam 4:20: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 1:17: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:16; Lam 4:20 (Latin/Greek version); faith unfeigned: 1 Tim 1:5; the righteous lives by faith: Rom 1:17 (Hab 2:4); fullness of God: Eph 3:19; 1 John 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.35 (CSEL 44:308–309; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-35).

## Letter 147.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-36
- Source: CSEL 44:309–310
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the view that being 'filled with all the fullness of God' means becoming equal to God, and defers its explanation.

### Latin text

Hanc plenitudinem dei quidam in sermone apostoli sic intellexerunt, ut putarent nos hoc futuros omnino, quod deus est. haec enim uerba, sicut recognoscis, apostolus posuit ita loquens: Cognoscere etiam supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi, ut impleamini in omnem plenitudinem dei. quapropter si aliquid, inquiunt, minus quam deus habebimus et in aliquo minores erimus, quo modo implebimur in omnem plenitudinem dei? sed, quoniam implebimur, profecto erimus aequales. auersaris istum utique et detestaris humanae mentis errorem, scio; recte facis. sed quo modo intellegenda sit ista plenitudo, qua dictum est implendos nos esse in omnem plenitudinem dei, postea, si deus uoluerit, pro uiribus, quas dederit, disseremus.

### English translation (Claude)

Some have understood this fullness of God in the apostle’s words as meaning that we shall become altogether what God is. For the apostle, as you recall, used these words, saying: “To know also the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.” “Therefore,” they say, “if we have anything less than God and are lesser in any respect, how shall we be filled with all the fullness of God? But since we shall be filled, we shall surely be equal.” You turn away from this error of the human mind and detest it, I know; you do well. But how this fullness is to be understood, by which it was said that we are to be filled with all the fullness of God, we shall discuss later, God willing, according to the strength he gives.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 3:19. Augustine answers the question in 147.53: we shall be full of God, not ourselves God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.36 (CSEL 44:309–310; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-36).

## Letter 147.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-37
- Source: CSEL 44:310–312
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine summarizes: God is invisible by nature but appears in chosen forms; his children will see him as he is, as the angels do, with the eyes of the heart.

### Latin text

Nunc autem, quod mihi proposueras et ad explicandum difficile uidebatur, utrum explicatum sit, diligenter adtende recolendo, quae dicta sunt. si enim quaeris, utrum possit deus uideri, respondeo: potest. si quaeris, unde sciam, respondeo: quia in ueracissima scriptura legitur: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, et cetera talia. si quaeris, quo modo dictus sit inuisibilis, si uideri potest, respondeo inuisibilem esse natura, uideri autem, cum uult, sicut uult; plurimis enim uisus est, non sicuti est, sed quali specie illi placuit apparere. si quaeris, quo modo eum uidit uel Cain sceleratus, quando de suo scelere ab illo interrogatus et iudicatus est, uel etiam ipse diabolus, quando uenit cum angelis, ut coram illo adsisteret, si beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, respondeo non quidem esse consequens, ut etiam uideant deum, qui uoces ab eo factas aliquando audiunt; neque enim uiderunt eum, qui audierunt, quando dixit ad filium: Et clarificaui et iterum clarificabo; uerum tamen non esse mirandum, si aliqui etiam non mundi corde uident deum in specie, quam uoluntas eius fecerit, latente inuisibili et apud se incommutabili manente natura. si quaeris, utrum etiam, sicuti est, aliquando possit uideri, respondeo filiis hoc esse promissum, de quibus dictum est: Scimus, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est. si quaeris, unde eum uidebimus, respondeo: unde angeli uident, quibus tunc erimus aequales; sicut enim uidentur ista, quae uisibilia nominantur, deum nemo uidit umquam nec uidere potest, quoniam lucem habitat inaccessibilem et est natura inuisibilis sicut incorruptibilis, quae contextim apostolus posuit dicens: Regi autem saeculorum inuisibili, incorruptibili, quia sicut nunc incorruptibilis nec postea corruptibilis ita non solum nunc sed etiam semper inuisibilis. nec in loco enim uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu). unigenitus autem filius, qui est in sinu patris, deitatis naturam atque substantiam insonabiliter narrat et ideo dignis idoneisque tanto conspectu oculis etiam inuisibiliter monstrat, ipsi enim sunt oculi, de quibus apostolus dicit: Inluminatos oculos cordis uestri et de quibus dicitur: Inlumina oculos meos, ne umquam obdormiam in morte. dominus enim spiritus est; unde, qui adhaeret domino, unus spiritus est; proinde, qui potest deum inuisibiliter uidere, ipse deo potest incorporaliter adhaerere.

### English translation (Claude)

Now consider carefully, recalling what has been said, whether what you put to me, which seemed difficult to explain, has been explained. If you ask whether God can be seen, I answer: he can. If you ask how I know, I answer: because in the most truthful Scripture we read, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and other such things. If you ask how he is called invisible if he can be seen, I answer that he is invisible by nature, but is seen when he wills, as he wills; for he has been seen by very many, not as he is, but in whatever form it pleased him to appear. If you ask how even the wicked Cain saw him, when he was questioned and judged by him about his crime, or even the devil himself, when he came with the angels to stand before him, if the pure in heart are blessed because they shall see God, I answer that it does not follow that those who sometimes hear words made by him also see God; for those did not see him who heard when he said to the Son, “I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again.” Yet it is not to be wondered at if some even who are not pure in heart see God in a form his will has made, while his invisible nature remains hidden and unchangeable in itself. If you ask whether he can ever be seen as he is, I answer that this has been promised to his children, of whom it was said: “We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.” If you ask by what means we shall see him, I answer: by that by which the angels see, to whom we shall then be equal. For in the way these things called visible are seen, no one has ever seen God or can see him, since he dwells in unapproachable light and is invisible by nature, as he is incorruptible; and the apostle put these together, saying, “To the King of the ages, invisible, incorruptible”: because, as he is incorruptible now and will not be corruptible later, so he is invisible not only now but always. For he “is not seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is he sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” But the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, declares without sound the nature and substance of the Godhead, and therefore shows it, invisibly too, to eyes worthy and fit for so great a sight. These are the eyes of which the apostle says, “the eyes of your heart enlightened,” and of which it is said, “Enlighten my eyes, lest I ever sleep in death.” For the Lord is the Spirit; hence he who cleaves to the Lord is one spirit; accordingly, he who can see God invisibly can cleave to God incorporeally.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 4:9: allusion, high confidence
- Job 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- John 12:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 13:3 (12:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:8; Cain: Gen 4:9–15; the devil: Job 1:6; “I have glorified it …”: John 12:28; 1 John 3:2; unapproachable light: 1 Tim 6:16; “To the King of the ages …”: 1 Tim 1:17; the eyes of the heart: Eph 1:18; “Enlighten my eyes …”: Ps 13:3 (LXX 12:4); “The Lord is the Spirit”: 2 Cor 3:17; “he who cleaves to the Lord is one spirit”: 1 Cor 6:17. The quotation is from Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.37 (CSEL 44:310–312; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-37).

## Letter 147.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-38
- Source: CSEL 44:312–313
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Paulina to sort what she has seen, believed, and not known, noting that the mind, not the body, distinguishes bodily from mental sight and stores images of bodies.

### Latin text

Puto iam non esse in quaestione, quam proposuisti, amplius, quod requiras. sed in hac tota nostra disputatione considera, quid uideris, quid credideris, quid adhuc nescias, siue quia non dixi siue quia non intellexisti siue quia non iudicasti esse credendum. et ea, quae uera esse uidisti, adhuc discerne, unde uideris, utrum recolendo illa te uidisse per corpus sicut corpora caelestia uel terrestria, an uero numquam ea corporalibus adtigeris uisibus, sed sola mente intuens uera et certa esse perspexeris sicut uoluntatem tuam, de qua ego tibi credere loquenti possum. eam uero, ut abs te uidetur, uidere ipse non possum. et cum haec utraque discreueris, etiam id adtende, unde discernas. quamuis enim alia corpore, alia mente uideamus, horum tamen duorum generum ipsa discretio uidetur mente, non corpore. et ea, quae mente conspiciuntur, non indigent ullo corporis sensu, ut ea uera esse nouerimus; quae autem per corpus uidentur, nisi mens adsit, quae talia nuntiata suscipiat, nulla possunt scientia contineri. et quod nuntiata quasi suscipere perhibetur, foris ea relinquit; sed eorum imagines, id est incorporeas similitudines corporum incorporaliter commendat memoriae, unde, cum uoluerit et potuerit, uelut de custodia productas atque in conspectum cogitationis exhibitas iudicet. et cum ualet, etiam duo ista discernit, quid in specie corporali foris reliquerit, quid eius simile intus aspiciat, et illud absens, hoc praesens esse dinoscit, sicut me absente faciem mei corporis cogitas et illa tibi est imago praesens, absens autem facies, cuius imago est; et haec corpus, illa uero incorporea corporis similitudo est.

### English translation (Claude)

I think there is now nothing more for you to ask in the question you proposed. But in this whole discussion of ours consider what you have seen, what you have believed, and what you still do not know, whether because I have not said it, or because you have not understood, or because you have not judged it worthy of belief. And among the things you have seen to be true, distinguish further by what you have seen them: whether by remembering that you saw them through the body, as heavenly or earthly bodies, or whether you have never touched them with bodily sight, but have perceived them to be true and certain by beholding them with the mind alone, like your will, about which I can believe you when you tell me, but which I cannot myself see as it is seen by you. And when you have distinguished both of these, notice also by what you distinguish them. For although we see some things with the body and others with the mind, the distinction itself between these two kinds is seen by the mind, not the body. And the things perceived by the mind need no sense of the body for us to know that they are true; but the things seen through the body cannot be held in any knowledge unless the mind is present to receive such reports. And what it is said, as it were, to receive as reported, it leaves outside; but it commits their images, that is, the incorporeal likenesses of bodies, incorporeally to memory, from which, when it wills and can, it brings them out as from a store and sets them before the gaze of thought, and judges them. And when it is able, it distinguishes these two things as well: what it left outside in bodily form, and what likeness of it it beholds within; and it recognizes the one as absent and the other as present: as, when I am absent, you think of the face of my body, and that image is present to you, while the face of which it is the image is absent; and the face is a body, while the image is an incorporeal likeness of a body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.38 (CSEL 44:312–313; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-38).

## Letter 147.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-39
- Source: CSEL 44:313–314
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds Paulina that his and Ambrose's words carry far less weight than canonical Scripture, though he shares Ambrose's view.

### Latin text

His igitur, quae uides, diligenter fidenterque perspectis atque distinctis adtende, quae credis in hoc ipso sermone toto, ex quo ad te loqui his litteris coepi. et in eis ipsis, quibus non uisis accommodas fidem, ipsa testium pondera discernendo perpende. neque enim mihi sic credis quem ad modum Ambrosio, de cuius libris tanta illa testimonia posui; aut si ambobus nobis aequa lance putas esse credendum, numquid ullo modo nos euangelio comparabis aut scripta nostra scripturis canonicis coaequabis? profecto, si recte in diiudicando sapis, longe nos infra uides ab illa auctoritate distare et me quidem longius, sed utrique nostrum quantum libet credas, utrumque illi excellentiae nequaquam comparas. quocirca id, quod scriptum est: Deum nemo uidit umquam, et: Lucem habitat inaccessibilem, quem nemo hominum uidit nec uidere potest, et: Beati mundo corde, quia ipsi deum uidebunt, et quicquid aliud ex illis sanctis libris commemoraui, firmius credis quam id, quod dixit Ambrosius: Nec in loco deus uidetur nec corporalibus oculis quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu. talem quippe esse intellexit uel credidit deum, qui mundo corde conspicitur; hanc autem etiam meam sententiam esse confiteor.

### English translation (Claude)

When you have carefully and confidently examined and distinguished these things that you see, consider what you believe in this whole discourse in which I began to speak to you in this letter. And among the very things to which, unseen, you give your faith, weigh and distinguish the weight of the witnesses. For you do not believe me in the same way as Ambrose, from whose books I have set down those great testimonies; or, if you think both of us are to be believed in equal balance, will you in any way compare us to the Gospel, or make our writings equal to the canonical Scriptures? Surely, if you judge rightly, you see that we stand far below that authority, and I farther; but however much you believe either of us, you in no way compare either to that excellence. Therefore you believe more firmly what is written, “No one has ever seen God,” and, “He dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one of men has seen or can see,” and, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and whatever else I have quoted from those holy books, than what Ambrose said: “Nor is God seen in a place, nor sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” For such he understood or believed God to be, who is beheld by a pure heart; and I confess that this is my opinion too.

### Scripture references

- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:18; 1 Tim 6:16; Matt 5:8. Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.39 (CSEL 44:313–314; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-39).

## Letter 147.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-40
- Source: CSEL 44:314–315
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paulina may hesitate over Augustine's interpretations, but she believes Scripture unconditionally; and she sees within herself her faith, doubt, and desire to learn.

### Latin text

Aliter ergo ista, aliter illa diuina uerba in fide recipis. de nobis enim tibi subest fortasse aliquis scrupulus, ne in his diuinis eloquiis aliquid minus dilucide intellegamus et, non sicut dicta sunt, sed sicut suspicamur, exponantur a nobis. forte enim dicis apud temet ipsam: Quid, si et mundo corde uidetur deus et in loco tamen uidetur? aut: Quid, si etiam oculis corporalibus deum uidebunt, qui mundo sunt corde, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, quando erimus aequales angelis dei? quantum ergo nobis credere debeas uel non debeas, fortassis ignoras et, uel plus uel minus, quam debes, nobis credendo ne fallaris, adtendis; diuinis autem scripturis etiam nondum perspicue intellectis credendum esse non dubitas. sed hanc certe considerationem credendi uel non credendi et difficultatem scientiae et dubitationis aestus et piam fidem, quae diuinis debetur affatibus, in tua mente, ita ut sunt, adtendis et uides nec de his omnino, quod apud te ita sint, siue ut ego dixi siue ut ipsa potius nosti, aliquid ambigis. uides itaque fidem tuam, uides dubitationem tuam, uides studium tuum uoluntatemque discendi et, cum auctoritate diuina mouearis ad credenda, quae non uides, haec te tamen credere incunctanter uides. distribuis et discernis haec omnia.

### English translation (Claude)

You receive, then, these words in faith in one way, and those divine words in another. For about us there may perhaps remain some scruple in you, lest we understand something in these divine utterances less clearly, and expound them not as they were said but as we suppose. For perhaps you say to yourself: “What if God is seen by a pure heart and yet is seen in a place?” Or: “What if those who are pure in heart will see God even with bodily eyes, when this corruptible has put on incorruption, when we shall be equal to the angels of God?” Perhaps, then, you do not know how far you ought or ought not to believe us, and you take care not to be deceived by believing us more or less than you should; but you do not doubt that the divine Scriptures must be believed even when they are not yet clearly understood. But certainly this weighing of believing or not believing, the difficulty of knowledge, the turmoil of doubt, and the pious faith owed to the divine utterances, you notice in your mind just as they are, and you see them, and you have no doubt at all that they are so in you, whether as I have said or as you yourself know better. You see, then, your faith, you see your doubt, you see your eagerness and will to learn; and though you are moved by divine authority to believe things you do not see, you see without hesitation that you believe them. You sort and distinguish all these things.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 20:36: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:53; Luke 20:36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.40 (CSEL 44:314–315; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-40).

## Letter 147.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-41
- Source: CSEL 44:315–316
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The inner eyes of the heart judge the bodily eyes and see what they cannot, and so are incomparably superior.

### Latin text

Num igitur his oculis cordis tui, quibus haec omnia uera et certa esse contueris tibique praesentia inuisibiliter cernis atque discernis, ullo modo corporeos oculos comparabis, cum etiam de ipsis rebus uisibilibus, quae corporalium oculorum acie quodam modo radiantur, et de ipsis corporeis oculis eorumque acie, qualiscumque et quantacumque sit, quantum distet ab inuisibilibus non excellentioribus, quibus etiam non uisis fidem debes, sed ab his, quae commemoraui, quae non credis absentia, sed praesentia mente contueris, non eisdem ipsis carnis oculis sed illis interioribus iudices? cum ergo interiores oculi iudices sint exteriorum oculorum, isti autem illis quodam officio nuntiandi et ministerio famulentur multaque illi uideant, quae isti non uident, nihil isti uideant, unde non illi tamquam praesides iudicent, quis non illos istis incomparabili aestimatione praeponat?

### English translation (Claude)

Will you, then, in any way compare your bodily eyes with these eyes of your heart, by which you behold all these things to be true and certain and invisibly discern and distinguish them as present to you? For it is not with those same eyes of the flesh but with those inner ones that you judge even about the visible things themselves, which are in a sense irradiated by the beam of the bodily eyes, and about the bodily eyes themselves and their beam, of whatever quality and strength it may be, and how far they stand from invisible things: not from the more excellent ones, to which you owe faith even unseen, but from those I have mentioned, which you do not believe as absent but behold as present to the mind. Since, then, the inner eyes are judges of the outer eyes, while the outer serve the inner in a kind of office of reporting, and the inner see many things the outer do not see, while the outer see nothing on which the inner do not pass judgment as presiding, who would not set the inner above the outer by a value beyond comparison?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.41 (CSEL 44:315–316; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-41).

## Letter 147.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-42
- Source: CSEL 44:316–317
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The mind sees inner truths in a light no bodily eye reaches and without spatial extension, though bodily images crowd in, as Augustine admitted in his earlier letter.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, obsecro te, cum agitur in te ipsa hoc tam grande negotium, cum ab exterioribus interiora distinguis atque illa istis ineffabiliter anteponis cumque istis foris relictis in illis intrinsecus demoraris et ea suis quibusdam incorporalibus finibus metiendo diiudicas, in nulla te putas an in aliqua luce uersari? ego enim existimo, quod tanta ibi et talia tam uera, tam clara, tam certa uideri sine luce non possunt. ipsam igitur lucem, in qua illa cuncta perspicis, intuere et uide, utrum ad eam possit accedere ullus corporeorum radius oculorum. profecto non potest adtende etiam et, utrum in ea uideas ulla locorum spatia uel interualla, responde. nihil ibi tale, ut arbitror, inuenis, si uigilanter abigis ab aspectu intimo, quicquid imaginum corporalium exterioris hominis sensus inuexit. sed forte difficile est; inruit enim de consuetudine carnalis uitae in ipsos quoque interiores oculos turba phantasmatum in similitudinibus corporum, cui resistere conatus saltem auctoritate diuina exclamaui dolens in illa breui epistula et dixi: Audiat caro carnalibus cogitationibus ebria: Spiritus est deus. neque enim cuiusquam magis quam etiam ipsam meam mentem ab huius modi uanitate illa increpatione compescui. facilius quippe inclinamur ad solita et amicum est infirmitati animae corporalem conuersationem introrsus uel mittere uel admittere, non ubi sana consistat, sed ubi languida quodam modo aut incumbat aut iaceat.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, I beg you: when this great business is going on within you, when you distinguish the inner from the outer and set the former ineffably above the latter, and, leaving the latter outside, dwell inwardly in the former and judge them by measuring them by certain incorporeal bounds of their own, do you think you are in no light, or in some light? For my part, I think that things so great and of such a kind, so true, so clear, so certain, cannot be seen there without light. Look, then, at that light itself in which you discern all those things, and see whether any ray of the bodily eyes can reach it. Surely it cannot. Notice also, and answer, whether you see in it any spaces or distances of places. You find nothing of the kind there, I think, if you vigilantly drive from your inmost sight whatever images of bodies the senses of the outer man have brought in. But perhaps it is difficult; for from the habit of carnal life a crowd of phantasms in the likenesses of bodies rushes in even upon those inner eyes. Trying to resist it, at least by divine authority, I cried out in sorrow in that short letter and said: “Let the flesh, drunk with carnal thoughts, hear this: God is spirit.” For by that rebuke I restrained no one’s mind from vanity of this kind more than my own. For we are more easily inclined to what is habitual, and it is congenial to the weakness of the soul to send or let carnal ways of thinking within, not where it may stand firm in health, but where, in a sense, it may lean or lie down in its sickness.

### Scripture references

- John 4:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The short letter is Letter 92 (to Italica), 92.5. “God is spirit”: John 4:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.42 (CSEL 44:316–317; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-42).

## Letter 147.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-43
- Source: CSEL 44:317–318
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even mental images of bodies occupy no space in the mind; much less do love, joy, and the other fruits of the Spirit, which are seen inwardly without place or sound.

### Latin text

Proinde, si non potes aciem mentis tuae a corporearum similitudinum quasi nubilo perspicue serenare, eas ipsas apud te ipsam uigilanter adtende. intuere caelum et terram cogitando, sicut oculis corporis cernendo consuesti, easque imagines caeli et terrae, quae ante oculos cogitationis productae sunt, uide similitudines corporum esse, non corpora. sic ergo iudica contra te ipsam pro te ipsa, si non potes omnifariam corporalium qualitatum imaginarias formas ab acie tuae mentis abigere, et, unde uinceris, inde conuince. neque enim est, ut opinor, quisquam etiam talibus imaginationibus ita deditus, ut credat sic esse in memoria sua uel in ipso conspectu cogitationis suae solem, lunam, stellas, amnes, maria, montes, colles, urbes, parietes denique domus suae uel etiam cubiculi sui, et quicquid per oculos corporis tale cognouit et tenet, ut locorum spatiis atque interuallis siue stent siue moueantur. porro si ea, quae in animo nostro sunt corporalibus locisque simillima, non tamen locorum spatiis ac finibus continentur nec interuallis localibus in nostra memoria reponuntur, quanto magis illa, quae nullam gerunt similitudinem corporum, caritas, gaudium, pax, longanimitas, benignitas, bonitas, fides, mansuetudo, continentia, nulla locorum spatia tenent, nulla intercapedine separantur aut aliqua oculi cordis, quo radios suos mittant et ea uideant, interualla conquirunt! nonne omnia in uno sunt sine angustia et suis terminis nota sunt sine circuitu regionum? aut dic, in quo loco uideas caritatem, quae tamen in tantum tibi cognita est, in quantum eam potes mentis acie contueri, quam non ideo magnam nosti, quia ingentem aliquam molem conspiciendo lustrasti; nec, cum tibi intus loquitur, ut secundum eam uiuas, ullis perstrepit sonis nec, ut eam cernas, corporalium lumen erigis oculorum nec, ut eam fortiter teneas, corporalium uires praeparas lacertorum nec, cum tibi uenit in mentem, sentis eius incessum.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, if you cannot clear the gaze of your mind plainly of the cloud, as it were, of bodily likenesses, attend vigilantly to these very likenesses within yourself. Look at heaven and earth in thought, as you are accustomed to discern them with the eyes of the body, and see that those images of heaven and earth which have been brought before the eyes of thought are likenesses of bodies, not bodies. Judge thus against yourself and for yourself, if you cannot drive altogether from the gaze of your mind the imaginary forms of bodily qualities; and refute yourself by the very thing that defeats you. For there is no one, I think, so given over even to such imaginings as to believe that the sun, moon, stars, rivers, seas, mountains, hills, cities, even the walls of his house or of his bedroom, and whatever of that kind he has come to know and holds through the eyes of the body, are in his memory, or in the very view of his thought, in such a way that they stand or move in spaces and distances of places. Further, if those things in our mind which are most like bodies and places are nevertheless not contained in spaces and bounds of places, nor stored in our memory by local distances, how much more do those things that bear no likeness to bodies (love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, self-control) occupy no spaces of places, are separated by no gap, nor do the eyes of the heart look for any distances across which to send their rays and see them! Are they not all in one without narrowness, and known within their own limits without any circuit of regions? Or tell me, in what place do you see love, which is nevertheless known to you just so far as you can behold it with the gaze of the mind? You do not know it to be great because you have surveyed some huge mass by looking at it; nor, when it speaks to you within so that you may live according to it, does it make any sound; nor, to discern it, do you raise the light of your bodily eyes; nor, to hold it firmly, do you prepare the strength of your bodily arms; nor, when it comes into your mind, do you perceive its gait.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:22: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The list is the fruit of the Spirit, Gal 5:22–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.43 (CSEL 44:317–318; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-43).

## Letter 147.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-44
- Source: CSEL 44:318–319
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If love and the inner man are seen without place, much more is God, who dwells in light approachable only by a pure heart; the soul must be healed to become spiritual.

### Latin text

Ecce etiam caritas, quantulacumque in nostra uoluntate consistit nobisque conspicua est, nec in loco uidetur nec corporalibus oculis quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu. quanto magis deus ipse, cuius hoc pignus in nobis est! nam si interior homo noster, quantulacumque imago eius non de illo genita sed ab illo creata, quamuis adhuc renouetur de die in diem, iam tamen in tali luce habitat, quo nullus oculorum corporalium sensus accedit, si ea, quae in illa luce cordis oculis intuemur, et discernuntur inter se et nullis locorum spatiis separantur, quanto magis deus, qui lucem habitat inaccessibilem corporis sensibus, quo nec ipsius nisi mundi potest esse cordis accessus! cum igitur lucem istam omni corporali luci non solum iudicio rationis sed amoris quoque appetitu praeposuerimus, quanto id magis ualebimus, tanto melius ualebimus, donec sanentur omnes languores animae nostrae ab illo, qui propitius fit omnibus iniquitatibus nostris. in hac enim uiuaciore uita facti spiritales poterimus omnia diiudicare, ipsi uero a nemine diiudicari. animalis autem homo non percipit, quae sunt spiritus dei; stultitia est enim illi et non potest scire, quoniam spiritaliter diiudicatur.

### English translation (Claude)

See, even love, however small it is in our will and visible to us, “is not seen in a place, nor sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” How much more God himself, of whom this is the pledge in us! For if our inner man, however small an image of him, not begotten of him but created by him, though still being renewed from day to day, already dwells in such a light that no sense of the bodily eyes reaches it; if the things we behold with the eyes of the heart in that light are both distinguished from one another and separated by no spaces of places; how much more God, who dwells in light unapproachable to the bodily senses, to which there can be no approach except by a pure heart! When, therefore, we have set this light above all bodily light, not only by the judgment of reason but also by the longing of love, the more strongly we do this, the better we shall be, until all the sicknesses of our soul are healed by him who is gracious to all our iniquities. For in that more living life, made spiritual, we shall be able to judge all things and ourselves be judged by no one. But the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually judged.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:3 (102:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The words quoted are Ambrose’s (Exposition of Luke 1.27), here applied to love. The inner man renewed: 2 Cor 4:16; unapproachable light: 1 Tim 6:16; “gracious to all our iniquities … heals all our sicknesses”: Ps 103:3 (LXX 102:3); the spiritual man judges all things: 1 Cor 2:15; the natural man: 1 Cor 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.44 (CSEL 44:318–319; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-44).

## Letter 147.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-45
- Source: CSEL 44:319–320
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since our mind, the best part of us, is invisible to bodily eyes, God, whose peace surpasses all understanding, cannot be visible to them.

### Latin text

Quod si nondum possumus praeferre lucem iudicantem ei luci, de qua iudicatur, praeferre uitam intellegentem uitae tantum modo sentienti, praeferre naturam non alibi hoc et alibi aliud sed omnia, quae habet, in uno simul habentem, sicuti est ipsa nostra intellegentia, ei naturae, quae ita partibus constat, ut minor sit dimidia quam tota, sicuti est omne corpus, superfluo de rebus tantis ac talibus disputamus. si autem hoc iam possumus, aliquid melius quam intellectum nostrum deum esse credamus, ut pax eius, quae praecellit omnem intellectum, custodiat corda nostra et intellegentias nostras in Christo Iesu. ipsa enim pax, quae praecellit omnem intellectum, non est utique minor nostro intellectu, ut, cum iste sit oculis corporalibus inuisibilis, illa putetur esse uisibilis. an aliud pax dei aliud splendor dei, cum idem ipse sit unigenitus filius, cuius et illa caritas, quae supereminet scientiae, cuius cognitione implebimur in omnem plenitudinem dei, non est luce nostrae mentis inferior, quae illa inluminante tribuitur? porro si ista inaccessibilis est oculis carnis, quanto magis illa huic incomparabiliter supereminens! ac per hoc, cum sit aliquid nostrum uisibile sicut hoc corpus aliquid uero inuisibile sicut homo interior et cum optimum nostrum, hoc est mens atque intellegentia, inuisibile sit oculis corporis, quo modo id, quod est melius optimo nostro, uisibile erit inferiori nostro?

### English translation (Claude)

But if we cannot yet prefer the light that judges to the light that is judged, prefer the life that understands to the life that only perceives by sense, prefer a nature that has not one thing here and another there but everything it has together in one, as our very understanding is, to a nature made of parts, so that a half is less than the whole, as every body is, then we are discussing such great matters to no purpose. But if we can do this already, let us believe that God is something better than our understanding, so that his peace, which surpasses all understanding, may guard our hearts and our minds in Christ Jesus. For that peace which surpasses all understanding is certainly not less than our understanding, so that, while our understanding is invisible to bodily eyes, that peace should be thought visible. Or is the peace of God one thing and the splendor of God another, when the only-begotten Son is both? And is not his love too, which surpasses knowledge, by the knowledge of which we shall be filled with all the fullness of God, not inferior to the light of our mind, which is given by its enlightening? Further, if this light is inaccessible to the eyes of the flesh, how much more that which surpasses it beyond comparison! And so, since something of ours is visible, like this body, and something invisible, like the inner man, and since the best part of us, that is, mind and understanding, is invisible to the eyes of the body, how will what is better than our best be visible to our lower part?

### Scripture references

- Phil 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 1:3: allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 3:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “The peace of God, which surpasses all understanding …”: Phil 4:7. The splendor of God: Heb 1:3 (cf. Wis 7:26). The love that surpasses knowledge and the fullness of God: Eph 3:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.45 (CSEL 44:319–320; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-45).

## Letter 147.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-46
- Source: CSEL 44:320–322
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists the truths of faith about God's invisibility, the Trinity, and the resurrection body, from which the spiritually mature have learned that mental sight surpasses bodily sight.

### Latin text

Arbitror iam te concedere his omnibus consideratis recte dictum esse, quod deus nec in loco uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu). et si quid in his minus intellegimus uel aliter sapimus, id quoque nobis deus reuelabit, si, in quod peruenimus, in eo ambulemus. peruenimus autem, ut credamus deum non corpus esse sed spiritum; peruenimus etiam, ut credamus, quod deum nemo uidit umquam et quod deus lux est et tenebrae in eo non sunt ullae et quod apud eum non est commutatio nec momenti obumbratio et quod lucem habitat inaccessibilem, quem nemo hominum uidit nec uidere potest, et quod pater et filius et spiritus sanctus unus deus est sine ulla diuersitate et separatione naturae et quod mundi corde eum uidebunt et quod similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est, et quod deus caritas est et, qui manet in caritate, in deo manet et deus in illo manet et quod pacem et sanctificationem sectari debemus, sine qua nemo poterit uidere deum, et quod corruptibile hoc ac mortale corpus nostrum in resurrectione commutabitur et induet incorruptionem atque inmortalitatem et quia seminatur corpus animale, resurget corpus spiritale transfigurante domino corpus humilitatis nostrae, ut conforme faciat corpori gloriae suae, et quod deus fecit hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem suam et quod spiritu mentis nostrae renouamur in agnitionem dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit nos. in his atque huius modi scripturarum sanctarum auctoritatibus per fidem ambulantes qui dato uel adiuto diuinitus intellectu spiritaliter profecerunt et spiritalia spiritalibus comparare potuerunt, uiderunt melius uideri mente quam corpore et ea uideri mente, quae non continerentur locis nec inter se locorum interuallis separarentur nec minora essent in parte quam in toto.

### English translation (Claude)

I think that, having considered all these things, you now grant that it was rightly said that “God is not seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is he sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” And if in these matters we understand anything less well or think otherwise, God will reveal that also to us, if we walk in what we have attained. And we have attained this: to believe that God is not a body but spirit. We have attained also to believe that no one has ever seen God; that God is light and in him there is no darkness at all; that with him there is no change nor shadow of a moment; that he dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one of men has seen or can see; that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God without any difference or separation of nature; that the pure in heart will see him; that we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is; that God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God and God abides in him; that we must pursue peace and holiness, without which no one will be able to see God; that this corruptible and mortal body of ours will be changed in the resurrection and will put on incorruption and immortality; that it is sown a natural body and will rise a spiritual body, the Lord transfiguring the body of our lowliness to conform it to the body of his glory; that God made man in his image and likeness; and that we are renewed in the spirit of our mind to the knowledge of God according to the image of him who created us. Walking by faith in these and similar authorities of the holy Scriptures, those who, by an understanding given or helped by God, have made spiritual progress and have been able to compare spiritual things with spiritual have seen that seeing with the mind is better than seeing with the body, and that those things are seen with the mind which are not contained in places, nor separated from one another by distances of places, nor less in part than in the whole.

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- John 4:24: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:26: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:23: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 3:15–16; John 4:24; John 1:18; 1 John 1:5; Jas 1:17; 1 Tim 6:16; Matt 5:8; 1 John 3:2; 1 John 4:16; Heb 12:14; 1 Cor 15:53, 44; Phil 3:21; Gen 1:26; Eph 4:23; Col 3:10; 1 Cor 2:13.
- Trinitarian passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.46 (CSEL 44:320–322; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-46).

## Letter 147.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-47
- Source: CSEL 44:322–323
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's appearances in Scripture, bodily or in dreams and ecstasy, are forms chosen by his will, as our hidden will expresses itself in words without changing.

### Latin text

Hinc est, quod fiducialiter ille dixit, quod Cnec in loco deus uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu. unde quia et inuisibilis in scripturis sanctis eius substantia commendatur et uisus esse a plurimis per corpus et corporalibus locis in eisdem auctoritatibus inuenitur aut spiritu, quo corporales cernuntur imagines, per aliquam licet incorpoream tamen similitudinem corporis sicut in somnis uel in extasi, secreuit ille uir sanctus a dei natura huius modi uisiones easque dixit esse, quas dei uoluntas elegisset, non quas natura formasset. facit enim istas deus, quibus, ut uult, cui uult, quando uult, appareat sua latente atque in se incommutabiliter manente substantia. si enim uoluntas nostra apud se manens et latens sine ulla sui commutatione, per quas se utcumque ostendat, exprimit uoces, quanto facilius deus omnipotens sua latente atque incommutabiliter manente natura, in qua uoluerit specie, potest, cui uoluerit, apparere, qui ex nihilo creauit omnia atque in se manens innouat omnia!

### English translation (Claude)

That is why he said confidently that “God is not seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is he sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” Hence, since in the holy Scriptures his substance is declared invisible, and yet in the same authorities he is found to have been seen by very many, either through the body and in bodily places, or by the spirit, by which bodily images are discerned, through some likeness of a body, incorporeal though it is, as in sleep or in ecstasy, that holy man separated visions of this kind from the nature of God and said that they were those which God’s will had chosen, not those which nature had formed. For God makes these, by which he appears as he wills, to whom he wills, when he wills, while his substance remains hidden and unchangeable in itself. For if our will, remaining in itself and hidden without any change of itself, utters words by which it shows itself in some fashion, how much more easily can almighty God, while his nature remains hidden and unchangeable, appear in whatever form he wills to whomever he wills, he who created all things from nothing and, remaining in himself, renews all things!

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:27 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Remaining in himself, he renews all things”: Wis 7:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.47 (CSEL 44:322–323; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-47).

## Letter 147.48

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-48
- Source: CSEL 44:323–324
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is called invisible so that he will not be thought a body; pure hearts will contemplate his substance, and Augustine follows Ambrose in denying this to bodily eyes even after the resurrection.

### Latin text

Ad eam uero uisionem, qua uidebimus deum, sicuti est, mundanda corda commonuit. quia enim corpora consuetudine loquendi uisibilia nominantur, propterea deus inuisibilis dicitur, ne corpus esse credatur, non quia corda munda suae substantiae contemplatione fraudabit, cum haec magna et summa merces deum colentibus et diligentibus promittatur dicente ipso domino, quando corporalibus oculis uisibiliter apparebat et inuisibilem se contuendum mundis cordibus promittebat: Qui diligit me, diligetur a patre meo et ego diligam eum et ostendam me ipsum illi. haec quippe natura eius aequaliter cum patre inuisibilis sicut aequaliter incorruptibilis est, quae, sicut supra dictum est, continuatim apostolus posuit diuinam substantiam, qua potuit, hominibus praedicatione commendans. quam si oculi corporales in resurrectione mutata corporum qualitate conspicient, uiderint, qui hoc possunt adstruere; me plus mouet illius sententia, qui nec in ipsa resurrectione hoc corporalibus oculis sed mundis cordibus tribuit.

### English translation (Claude)

But for that vision by which we shall see God as he is, he urged that hearts be cleansed. For since in common speech bodies are called visible, God is called invisible so that he may not be believed to be a body, not because he will cheat pure hearts of the contemplation of his substance, since this great and highest reward is promised to those who worship and love God, the Lord himself saying, when he appeared visibly to bodily eyes and promised himself, invisible, to be beheld by pure hearts: “He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and show myself to him.” For this nature of his is invisible equally with the Father, as it is equally incorruptible; and the apostle, as was said above, put these together, declaring the divine substance to men as far as he could by his preaching. Whether bodily eyes will behold it in the resurrection, when the quality of bodies has been changed, let those see to it who can establish this; I am more moved by the opinion of him who attributes this, even in the resurrection, not to bodily eyes but to pure hearts.

### Scripture references

- John 14:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 14:21; “invisible, incorruptible”: 1 Tim 1:17 (see 147.37).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.48 (CSEL 44:323–324; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-48).

## Letter 147.49

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-49
- Source: CSEL 44:324–325
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine is open to discussion of the resurrection body but rejects those who think God a body; the view that the risen body becomes spirit is more tolerable and still leaves bodily eyes unable to see God.

### Latin text

Et de spiritalis quidem corporis qualitate, quod resurrecturis promittitur, uel discere aliquid adhuc uel quaerere non recuso, si tamen de hac re disputantes illis uitiis carere possimus, quae plerumque studiis humanis et concertationibus excitantur, dum supra, quam scriptum est, unus pro altero infletur aduersus alterum, ne, dum altercando quaerimus uestigare, quo modo possit uideri deus, ipsam pacem sanctificationemque perdamus, sine qua nemo poterit uidere deum; quod ipse auertat a cordibus nostris, ut ea suae contemplationi munda reddat atque custodiat. illud tamen quia non dubito, non requiro, quod dei natura numquam uideatur in loco. iam utrum possit huius corporis oculis uideri aliquid, quod in loco non uidetur, ab eis, qui hoc ualent disserendo monstrare, cum pace dilectionis audire paratus sum et, quod me monet, in commune conferre. sunt enim quidam, qui deum ipsum omnino corpus esse praesumunt putantes, quicquid corpus non est, nullam prorsus esse substantiam. istos omni modo auersandos censeo. sunt autem alii deum quidem ipsum corpus non esse minime dubitantes, sed ideo eos, qui ad uitam aeternam resurgent, etiam per corpus deum uisuros putant, quoniam talem sperant spiritalis corporis qualitatem, ut etiam ipsa, quae caro fuerat, spiritus fiat. quod si ita est, quantum distet a superiore opinione et quam hoc sit tolerabilius, etiam si uerum non sit, puto facillime iudicari: primo, quia multum interest, utrum de creatore an de creatura aliter aliquid sentiatur, quam ueritas habet; deinde, quia conatus mentis utcumque ferendus est uolentis corpus conuertere in spiritum, non in corpus deum; postremo, quia id, quod ego in illa epistula mea dixi de istis nostrae carnis oculis, quia neque nunc possunt neque tunc poterunt deum uidere, etiam sic uerum est; non enim dictum est nisi de oculis corporalibus, quod tunc non erunt, si corpus ipsum spiritus erit, ac per hoc corporei oculi numquam deum uidebunt, quia, cum uidebitur, spiritus eum, non corpus uidebit.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the quality of the spiritual body promised to those who will rise, I do not refuse either to learn or to inquire further, provided that in discussing this matter we can be free of those faults which are usually stirred up by human zeal and contention, when one is puffed up for one against another beyond what is written; lest, while by wrangling we seek to trace how God can be seen, we lose the very peace and holiness without which no one will be able to see God. May he himself turn this away from our hearts, so as to make them pure for his contemplation and keep them so. But this I do not doubt, and so I do not inquire: that the nature of God is never seen in a place. Whether, further, something that is not seen in a place can be seen by the eyes of this body, I am ready to hear, in the peace of love, from those who can show it by argument, and to share with others what convinces me. For there are some who presume that God himself is altogether a body, thinking that whatever is not a body is no substance at all. Such people I judge must be turned away from in every way. But there are others who have no doubt that God himself is not a body, but think that those who rise to eternal life will see God even through the body, because they hope for such a quality of the spiritual body that what was flesh will itself become spirit. If this is so, I think it is very easily judged how far it differs from the former opinion, and how much more tolerable it is, even if it is not true: first, because it makes a great difference whether one thinks otherwise than the truth about the Creator or about the creature; second, because the effort of a mind that wishes to turn the body into spirit, not God into a body, is somehow to be borne; finally, because what I said in that letter of mine about these eyes of our flesh, that neither now can they nor then will they be able to see God, is true even so. For it was said only of bodily eyes, which will not exist then if the body itself is to be spirit; and so bodily eyes will never see God, since, when he is seen, it will be spirit, not body, that sees him.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Puffed up for one against another beyond what is written”: 1 Cor 4:6. Heb 12:14. “That letter” is Letter 92.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.49 (CSEL 44:324–325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-49).

## Letter 147.50

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-50
- Source: CSEL 44:325–326
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The question of the spiritual body remains, but vision cannot belong only to bodies, since the Father sees the Son, God saw creation before the incarnation, and prophets are called seers.

### Latin text

Tota igitur quaestio iam remansit de corpore spiritali, quatenus induat incorruptionem et inmortalitatem hoc corruptibile atque mortale et quatenus ex animali in spiritale mutetur. quae diligentius sollicitiusque tractanda est maxime propter corpus ipsius domini, qui transfigurat corpus humilitatis nostrae conforme corpori gloriae suae, ut possit sibi subicere omnia. cum enim et deus pater uideat filium et filius patrem, procul dubio non sunt audiendi, qui uisionem nolunt tribuere nisi corporibus. neque enim dici fas est, quod filium pater non uideat, aut, et ipse ut uideat, corpore indutus est, si nonnisi ad corpus pertinet uisus. quid, quod in ipso mundi exordio, antequam a filio esset ulla forma serui suscepta, uidit deus lucem, quia bona est, et firmamentum et mare et aridam et omne faenum atque omne lignum, solem, lunam, stellas, reptilia animarum uiuarum, uolatilia caeli, animam uiuam? postremo uidit deus omnia, quae fecit, et ecce bona ualde. quod cum per quasque creaturas totiens scriptura repetisset, miror, unde nata fuerit illa opinio, qua putatum est tantum ad corpora pertinere uisionem. quae opinio de quocumque loquendi more orta sit, scripturae tamen sanctae non sic loqui solent, quae nisi non tantum corpori uerum etiam spiritui magisque spiritui quam corpori uisionem tribuerent, non prophetas proprie uidentes) appellauissent, qui non corpore sed spiritu etiam futura uiderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

The whole question, then, now remains about the spiritual body: how far this corruptible and mortal puts on incorruption and immortality, and how far it is changed from natural to spiritual. This must be treated with special care and concern, above all because of the body of the Lord himself, who transfigures the body of our lowliness to conform it to the body of his glory, so that he can subject all things to himself. For since God the Father sees the Son and the Son the Father, those are certainly not to be listened to who will attribute vision only to bodies. For it is not lawful to say that the Father does not see the Son, or that he too, in order to see, has put on a body, if sight belongs only to a body. What of the fact that at the very beginning of the world, before any form of a servant had been taken by the Son, God saw the light, that it was good, and the firmament and the sea and the dry land and every plant and every tree, the sun, the moon, the stars, the creeping things of living souls, the birds of the sky, the living soul? Finally, God saw all that he had made, and behold, it was very good. Since Scripture repeated this so many times through each of the creatures, I wonder where that opinion arose by which it was thought that vision belongs only to bodies. From whatever manner of speaking that opinion arose, the holy Scriptures do not usually speak so; if they did not attribute vision not only to the body but also to the spirit, and to the spirit more than to the body, they would not have called the prophets, in the proper sense, “seers,” who saw even future things, not with the body but with the spirit.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:4: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Sam 9:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:53–54, 44; Phil 3:21; the form of a servant: Phil 2:7; God saw: Gen 1:4–31; prophets called seers: 1 Sam 9:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.50 (CSEL 44:325–326; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-50).

## Letter 147.51

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-51
- Source: CSEL 44:326–328
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine leaves open the nature of the spiritual body but holds that 'face to face' refers to the inner face of the heart, unveiled in Christ, not a bodily face.

### Latin text

Sed cogitandum est, ne quid insolenter audeamus. si dixerimus corpus non solum mortalitatem et corruptibilitatem uerum etiam hoc ipsum, quod corpus est, per gloriam resurrectionis amittere et spiritum fieri. eo modo quippe aut conduplicabitur substantia spiritus, si et corpus spiritus erit, aut, si unus erit spiritus hominis, ita ut commutato et conuerso in spiritum corpore neque geminatione neque incremento conduplicetur nec omnino ullius accessu quantitatis augeatur, metuendum est, ne nihil aliud dici uideatur quam corpora non illa mutatione inmortalia mansura, sed nulla potius futura et omnino peritura. quapropter donec diligenti inquisitione, si dominus adiuuerit, reperiatur, quid secundum scripturas de spiritali corpore, quod in resurrectione promittitur, probabilius sentiendum sit, interim nobis sufficiat, quod unigenitus filius idemque mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus ita uidet patrem, sicut uidetur a patre. nos autem ad illam uisionem dei, quae nobis in resurrectione promittitur, non ex hoc mundo istam concupiscentiam oculorum transferre conemur, sed mundandis cordibus pio studeamus affectu, nec corporalem faciem cogitemus, cum dicit apostolus: Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate tunc autem facie ad faciem, praesertim quia apostolus expressius dixit: Nunc scio ex parte, tunc autem cognoscam, sicut et cognitus sum. si ergo tunc corporali deum facie cognoscemus, corporali nunc eius facie cogniti sumus; tunc enim cognoscam, inquit, sicut et cognitus sum. unde quis eum non intellegat eo loco etiam nostram faciem illam significare uoluisse, de qua dicit alio loco: Nos autem reuelata facie gloriam domini speculantes in eandem imaginem transformamur de gloria in gloriam tamquam a domini spiritu, de gloria scilicet fidei in gloriam contemplationis aeternae? hoc quippe agit haec transformatio, qua interior homo renouatur de die in diem, de quo et apostolus Petrus, cum eum moneret ornari: Non quae aforis, inquit, ornantur capillorum incrispationibus aut auro et margaritis uel ueste pretiosa, sed ille absconditus cordis homo, qui est ante deum diues. in qua enim facie uelamen habent Iudaei non transeundo ad Christum, quoniam, cum transierit quisque ad Christum, auferetur uelamen, ea nos facie reuelata in eandem imaginem transformamur. apertissime autem dicit: Velamen super corda eorum positum est. ibi est igitur facies, qua reuelata nunc in fide quamuis per speculum et in aenigmate contuemur tunc autem facie ad faciem.

### English translation (Claude)

But we must take care not to venture anything presumptuous, if we say that the body loses through the glory of the resurrection not only mortality and corruptibility but also its very being a body, and becomes spirit. For in that way either the substance of spirit will be doubled, if the body too is to be spirit; or, if a man’s spirit is to be one, so that when the body has been changed and turned into spirit it is neither doubled by duplication nor by increase, nor augmented at all by the addition of any quantity, it is to be feared that nothing else would seem to be said than that bodies will not remain immortal by that change, but will rather be nothing and perish altogether. Therefore, until by careful inquiry, if the Lord helps, it is found what is more probably to be thought according to the Scriptures about the spiritual body promised in the resurrection, let it suffice us meanwhile that the only-begotten Son, who is also the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, sees the Father as he is seen by the Father. As for us, let us not try to carry this lust of the eyes over from this world to that vision of God promised to us in the resurrection, but let us strive with pious affection to cleanse our hearts; and let us not think of a bodily face when the apostle says, “We see now through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face,” especially since the apostle said more expressly, “Now I know in part, but then I shall know even as I have been known.” If, then, we shall then know God by a bodily face, we are now known by his bodily face; for “then I shall know,” he says, “even as I have been known.” Hence who would not understand that in that place he meant our face too, of which he says in another place: “But we, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord,” that is, from the glory of faith to the glory of eternal contemplation? For this is what this transformation does, by which the inner man is renewed from day to day; of whom the apostle Peter also speaks, when he urged that he be adorned: “not with outward adornment of braided hair or gold and pearls or costly clothing, but the hidden man of the heart, which is rich before God.” For in that face on which the Jews have a veil because they do not pass over to Christ (since, when anyone passes over to Christ, the veil will be taken away), we, with that face unveiled, are transformed into the same image. And he says most plainly: “A veil is laid over their hearts.” There, then, is the face with which, unveiled, we now behold in faith, though through a mirror and in an enigma, but then face to face.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:16: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:4: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:5; lust of the eyes: 1 John 2:16; 1 Cor 13:12; 2 Cor 3:18; 2 Cor 4:16; 1 Pet 3:3–4 (as quoted, with 1 Tim 2:9); the veil: 2 Cor 3:14–16. The reference to the Jews follows Paul and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.51 (CSEL 44:326–328; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-34/#p-147-51).

## Letter 147.52

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-52
- Source: CSEL 44:328–329
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine endorses Ambrose's view on its truth, not merely because Ambrose converted and baptized him, and quotes the passage again.

### Latin text

Quae si adprobas, tene mecum sancti uiri Ambrosii sententiam iam non eius auctoritate sed ipsa ueritate firmatam. neque enim et mihi propterea placet, quia per illius os potissimum me dominus ab errore liberauit et per illius ministerium gratiam mihi baptismi salutaris indulsit, tamquam plantatori et rigatori meo nimium faueam, sed quia de hac re et ipse hoc dixit, quod pie cogitanti et recte intellegenti loquitur etiam ille, qui incrementum dat, deus. in ipsa ergo resurrectione non facile est deum uidere nisi his, qui corde sint mundo, et ideo: Beati mundo corde; ipsi enim deum uidebunt. quantos beatos iam numerauerat et tamen uidendi his deum non promiserat facultatem! si ergo hi, qui mundo sunt corde, deum uidebunt, utique alii non uidebunt; neque enim indigni deum uidebunt neque is, qui deum uidere noluerit, potest deum uidere. nec in loco deus uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis deus quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu; et, cum absens putatur, uidetur et, cum praesens est, non uidetur. denique nec apostoli omnes Christum uidebant et ideo ait: Tanto tempore uobiscum sum et adhuc me non cognouistis. qui enim cognouit, quae sit latitudo et longitudo et altitudo et profundum, et supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi, uidit et Christum, uidit et patrem. nos enim iam secundum carnem non nouimus Christum sed secundum spiritum. spiritus enim ante faciem nostram Christus dominus, qui nos in omnem plenitudinem dei misericordia sua implere dignetur, ut uideri possit a nobis).

### English translation (Claude)

If you approve these things, hold with me the opinion of the holy man Ambrose, now confirmed not by his authority but by the truth itself. For it does not please me because through his mouth above all the Lord freed me from error and through his ministry granted me the grace of saving baptism, as if I favored my planter and waterer too much, but because on this matter he too said what God, who gives the growth, also speaks to one who thinks piously and understands rightly: “In the resurrection itself, it is not easy to see God except for those who are pure in heart; and so: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’ How many had he already numbered as blessed, and yet he had not promised them the ability to see God! If, then, those who are pure in heart will see God, others certainly will not see him; for neither will the unworthy see God, nor can he who has not wished to see God see God. Nor is God seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is God sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait; and when he is thought absent, he is seen, and when he is present, he is not seen. Then, not all the apostles saw Christ, and so he says: ‘Have I been with you so long, and you have not yet known me?’ For whoever has known what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, has seen both Christ and the Father. For we no longer know Christ according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. For the Spirit before our face is Christ the Lord, who in his mercy may deign to fill us with all the fullness of God, so that he may be seen by us.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:16: allusion, high confidence
- Lam 4:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ambrose baptized Augustine at Milan at Easter 387. The quotation repeats Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.27 (see 147.18).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.52 (CSEL 44:328–329; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-52).

## Letter 147.53

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-53
- Source: CSEL 44:329–330
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who grasp Ambrose's words prepare themselves to be God's dwelling and filled with him, not to become God; Jerome too teaches that the Trinity is seen only by the mind's eyes.

### Latin text

Haec uerba sancti uiri, quae non carnalia sed spiritalia sunt, in quantum intellegis et uera esse, non quia ipse dixit, sed quia ueritas sine strepitu clamat, agnoscis, in tantum intellegis, unde adhaereas domino, teque ipsam intrinsecus praeparas incorporalem locum mansionis eius ad audiendum silentium narrationis eius et uidendam inuisibilem formam eius. beati enim mundo corde, quia ipsi deum uidebunt, non cum eis sicut corpus ex aliquo loci interuallo apparebit, sed cum uenerit ad eos et mansionem fecerit apud eos, quoniam sic implebuntur in omnem plenitudinem dei, non cum fuerint et ipsi plenus deus, sed cum perfecte fuerint pleni deo. si autem nonnisi corpora cogitamus et nec illud saltem digne cogitare possumus, unde uel ipsa corpora cogitemus, non quaeramus, quid aduersum nos ipsos loquamur, sed ab hac potius carnali consuetudine orando et in anteriora nos extendendo corda mundemus. ut enim non tantum quod beatus Ambrosius uerum etiam quod sanctus Hieronymus dicam, non solum patris diuinitatem sed ne filii quidem nec spiritus sancti, quia una in trinitate natura est, possunt oculi carnis aspicere sed oculi mentis, de quibus ipse saluator ait: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt). namque, sicut alibi idem Hieronymus breuiter ac ueraciter definiuit, res incorporalis corporalibus oculis non uidetur.

### English translation (Claude)

In so far as you understand these words of the holy man, which are not carnal but spiritual, and recognize them as true, not because he said them but because the truth cries out without noise, to that extent you understand by what you cleave to the Lord, and you prepare yourself within as an incorporeal place for his dwelling, to hear the silence of his declaring and to see his invisible form. For blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God: not when he appears to them like a body from some distance of place, but when he comes to them and makes his dwelling with them; since thus they will be filled with all the fullness of God, not when they themselves are fully God, but when they are perfectly full of God. But if we think of nothing but bodies, and cannot worthily think even of that by which we think of bodies themselves, let us not look for things to say against ourselves, but rather let us cleanse our hearts from this carnal habit by praying and stretching out to what lies ahead. For, to quote not only blessed Ambrose but also holy Jerome: “Not only the divinity of the Father but not even that of the Son or of the Holy Spirit, since there is one nature in the Trinity, can the eyes of the flesh behold, but the eyes of the mind, of which the Savior himself says, ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’” For, as the same Jerome defined briefly and truly elsewhere, an incorporeal thing is not seen with bodily eyes.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:23: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:19: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 14:23; Eph 3:19 (answering the question raised in 147.36); stretching out to what lies ahead: Phil 3:13; Matt 5:8.
- The quotations are from Jerome, Commentary on Isaiah (on Isa 1:1 and 6:1, as commonly identified; the exact places are uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.53 (CSEL 44:329–330; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-53).

## Letter 147.54

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-54
- Source: CSEL 44:330–332
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes: the views of Ambrose and Jerome are not Scripture but should restrain hasty critics; the essential lesson is to prepare a pure heart to see God.

### Latin text

Has sententias de re tanta uirorum tantorum non ob hoc interponere uolui, ut cuiusquam hominis sensum tamquam scripturae canonicae auctoritatem sequendum arbitreris, sed ut illi, qui aliter sapiunt, conentur mente uidere, quod uerum est, et in simplicitate cordis quaerere deum, ne tam doctos diuinorum eloquiorum tractatores temere reprehendant. nec te moueat, quod a quibusdam minus considerate dicitur: Quid tunc uidebunt oculi corporales, si deum non uidebunt? an forte caeci erunt uel sine causa erunt? neque enim adtendunt, qui haec loquuntur, quia, si non erunt corpora, profecto illi oculi non erunt corporales; si autem erunt corpora, erit, quod uidere possint oculi corporales. sed haec iam satis dicta sint, quae ab initio huius opusculi mei diligenter lecta et relecta considerans sine ulla fortasse dubitatione perspicies ad uidendum deum per eius auxilium cor mundum te debere praeparare. de corpore uero spiritali, si dominus iuuerit, opere alio experiemur, quid disputare ualeamus.

### English translation (Claude)

I wished to insert these opinions of such great men on so great a matter, not so that you should think any man’s view is to be followed like the authority of canonical Scripture, but so that those who think otherwise may try to see with the mind what is true and to seek God in simplicity of heart, and not rashly criticize such learned expounders of the divine utterances. And do not be troubled by what some say rather thoughtlessly: “What then will bodily eyes see, if they will not see God? Will they perhaps be blind, or exist for no purpose?” For those who say this do not notice that, if there are no bodies, there will certainly be no bodily eyes; but if there are bodies, there will be something that bodily eyes can see. But let what has been said be enough now. Considering it, read and reread carefully from the beginning of this little work of mine, you will perhaps see without any doubt that, to see God, you must by his help prepare a pure heart. As for the spiritual body, we shall try in another work, if the Lord helps, to see what we can say.

### Translation notes

- Augustine took up the spiritual body in Letter 148 and later in City of God 22.29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 147.54 (CSEL 44:330–332; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-147-54).

## Letter 148.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-1
- Source: CSEL 44:332–333
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Fortunatianus to seek pardon for him from a fellow bishop offended by the harshness of Letter 92, though he stands by its teaching that bodily eyes do not see God.

### Latin text

Sicut praesens rogaui, et nunc commoneo, ut fratrem nostrum, de quo conlocuti sumus, uidere et rogare digneris, ut ignoscat mihi, si quid durius et asperius in se dictum accepit in ea epistula, quam me illo modo scripsisse non paenitet, quia dixi istius corporis oculos nec uidere deum nec esse uisuros. causam quippe adiunxi, cur hoc dixerim, ne scilicet deus ipse corporeus esse credatur et in loci spatio interualloque uisibilis — nihil enim uidere aliter istius corporis oculus potest — et ne illud, quod dictum est: Facie ad faciem, sic accipiatur, tamquam membris corporis terminatus sit deus. ideo me ergo illud dixisse non paenitet, ne de ipso deo tam impie sentiamus, ut eum non ubique totum sed per localia spatia diuisibilem existimemus; talia quippe his oculis nouimus.

### English translation (Claude)

As I asked you in person, so now I remind you: be so kind as to see our brother of whom we spoke, and ask him to pardon me if he took anything said against him in that letter as too harsh and sharp. I do not regret having written it in that way, because I said that the eyes of this body neither see God nor will see him. For I added the reason why I said this: namely, that God himself should not be believed to be corporeal and visible in a space and distance of place (for the eye of this body cannot see anything otherwise), and that what was said, “face to face,” should not be taken as though God were bounded by the members of a body. So I do not regret having said it, lest we think so impiously of God himself as to suppose that he is not everywhere whole but divisible through local spaces; for such are the things we know with these eyes.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Fortunatianus, bishop of Sicca (ca. 413); the address is not printed in the staged text. The offended bishop is not named. “That letter” is Letter 92, to Italica.
- 1 Cor 13:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.1 (CSEL 44:332–333; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-1).

## Letter 148.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-2
- Source: CSEL 44:333
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If someone holds that the risen body will be able to see the incorporeal God, Augustine will learn from him; that view, being about the body rather than God, is tolerable and does not contradict his letter.

### Latin text

Ceterum nihil tale de deo sentiens sed eum incommutabilem et incorporalem spiritum ubique totum esse credens si tantam quisquam mutationem huius corporis futuram putat, cum ex animali fuerit spiritale, ut etiam substantiam incorporalem non locorum interuallis uel spatiis diuisibilem uel etiam membrorum liniamentis ac finibus terminatam sed ubique totam per tale corpus uidere possimus, uolo, et me doceat, si uerum sapit; si autem in hoc falsum sentit, longe tolerabilius est corpori aliquid adrogare quam deo derogare. et si uera est ista sententia, non erit contraria uerbis meis, quae in illa epistula posui. istius namque corporis oculos dixi non uisuros deum hoc intuens, quod istius corporis oculi omnino non possunt cernere nisi corpora, quae ab eis aliquo loci interuallo separata sunt; nam si nullum interuallum sit, nec ipsa corpora per eos uidemus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if anyone, thinking nothing of this kind about God but believing him to be an unchangeable and incorporeal spirit, everywhere whole, thinks that so great a change of this body will take place, when from natural it has become spiritual, that through such a body we shall be able to see even an incorporeal substance, not divisible by distances or spaces of place, nor bounded by the outlines and limits of members, but everywhere whole, I wish him to teach me too, if what he thinks is true. But if he thinks falsely in this, it is far more tolerable to claim something for the body than to take something away from God. And if that opinion is true, it will not be contrary to the words I set down in that letter. For I said that the eyes of this body will not see God, with this in view: that the eyes of this body can see nothing at all but bodies separated from them by some distance of place; for if there is no distance, we do not see even bodies through them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Natural and spiritual body: 1 Cor 15:44.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.2 (CSEL 44:333; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-2).

## Letter 148.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-3
- Source: CSEL 44:333–334
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Either the risen body remains essentially the same and cannot see God, or it is so transformed that its eyes are no longer 'the eyes of this body'; either way Augustine's statement holds.

### Latin text

Porro autem, si in tantam sui dissimilitudinem nostra corpora mutabuntur, ut oculos habeant, per quos uideatur illa substantia, quae non per locorum spatia uel diffunditur uel finitur alibi habens aliam partem alibi aliam, in minore loco minorem in maiore maiorem, sed ubique incorporaliter tota est, longe aliud erunt haec corpora et non erunt ipsa nec sola detracta mortalitate atque corruptione et ponderis grauitate aliud erunt, sed in uirtutem ipsius mentis quodam modo conuertentur, si uidere poterunt, quo modo tunc menti nunc autem nec ipsi menti uidere concessum est. si enim mutatis moribus dicimus hominem non esse, qui fuit, si denique mutatis aetatibus ipsum corpus dicimus non esse, quod fuit, quanto magis ipsum non erit tanta conuersione mutatum, ut non solum inmortaliter uiuat, uerum etiam inuisibilem uideat! quapropter, si uidebunt deum, non istius corporis oculi uidebunt, quia et in hoc non erit ipsum corpus usque in illam uim potentiamque mutatum, et non est contraria ista opinio illis uerbis epistulae meae. si autem hactenus non erit ipsum, quia nunc mortale tunc inmortale, nunc adgrauans animam tunc nullo pondere ad omnem motum erit facillimum ad uidenda uero ea, quae locorum spatiis interuallisque cernuntur, si non aliud quam ipsum erit, substantiam incorporalem et ubique totam nullo modo uidebit. siue ergo illud siue hoc uerum sit, secundum utrumque uerum est, quod istius corporis oculi deum non uidebunt; aut enim istius erunt et non uidebunt aut non erunt istius, si uidebunt, quoniam tanta commutatione longe alterius corporis erunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, if our bodies are to be changed into such unlikeness to themselves that they have eyes through which that substance can be seen which is neither spread out nor bounded through spaces of places, having one part here and another there, a smaller part in a smaller place and a larger in a larger, but is everywhere whole incorporeally, these bodies will be something very different and will not be themselves; and they will be something else not merely by the removal of mortality and corruption and the heaviness of weight, but they will be turned in some way into the power of the mind itself, if they are able to see in the way it will then be granted to the mind to see, though now it is not granted even to the mind itself. For if, when a man’s character has changed, we say he is not the man he was, and if, when his age has changed, we say the body itself is not what it was, how much more will it not be itself when changed by so great a conversion that it not only lives immortally but even sees the invisible! Therefore, if they see God, it will not be the eyes of this body that see, because in this too the body will not be itself, having been changed into that force and power; and this opinion is not contrary to those words of my letter. But if it is not itself only in this respect, that now it is mortal and then immortal, now weighing down the soul and then, without any weight, most nimble for every movement, but suited to see the things discerned in spaces and distances of place, if it is to be nothing other than itself, it will in no way see the incorporeal substance which is everywhere whole. So whether that or this is true, on either view it is true that the eyes of this body will not see God; for either they will be of this body and will not see, or they will not be of this body, if they see, since by so great a change they will be of a very different body.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “The body weighs down the soul”: Wis 9:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.3 (CSEL 44:333–334; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-3).

## Letter 148.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-4
- Source: CSEL 44:334–335
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine admits he was too harsh toward a fellow bishop, asks pardon, and requests Fortunatianus to reconcile them, since a meeting had been refused.

### Latin text

Sed paratus sum, si quid de hac re melius nouit hic frater, uel ab ipso uel ab illo, a quo didicit, discere. quod si inridenter dicerem, etiam illud de deo corporali membrisque per loca diuisibili dicerem paratum esse me discere. quod non dico, quia non inridenter loquor et talem deum non esse omnino non ambigo et, ne talis esse crederetur, illam epistulam scripsi. in qua dum essem in admonendo sollicitus, quamuis nominibus tacitis in corripiendo nimius atque inprouidus fui nec fraternam et episcopalem personam sicut frater et episcopus, quem ad modum dignum fuerat, cogitaui. hoc non defendo, sed reprehendo; hoc non excuso, sed accuso; ignoscatur, peto; recordetur nostram dilectionem pristinam et obliuiscatur offensionem nouam. faciat certe, quod me non fecisse suscensuit; habeat lenitatem in danda uenia, quam ego in illa epistula conscribenda non habui. hoc per tuam caritatem rogo, quod praesens praesentem rogare nolueram, si eius haberem copiam. quod cum conatus essem, scribente ad eum uiro uenerabili nobisque omnibus honore praeferendo uenire noluit dolum forsitan meum, sicut pleraque humana sunt, quantum existimo, suspicatus. a quo me longe abesse tu illi fac fidem, quantum potes, qui praesens facilius potes. indica ei, cum quanto et quam uero dolore de offensione animi eius tecum fuerim conlocutus. nouerit, quam non eum contemnam et quantum in illo deum timeam et cogitem caput nostrum, in cuius corpore fratres sumus. ad locum, in quo habitat, ideo mihi non putaui esse ueniendum, ne spectaculum faceremus ridendum alienis, nostris dolendum, nobis pudendum. per tuam sanctitatem et caritatem totum recte agi potest; ab illo quippe agitur, qui per fidem suam habitat in corde tuo, quem credo quod non spernit in te, cum agnoscit in se.

### English translation (Claude)

But I am ready, if this brother knows anything better on this matter, to learn it either from him or from the one from whom he learned it. If I were saying this mockingly, I would also say that I am ready to learn that God is corporeal and divisible into members through places. That I do not say, because I am not speaking mockingly, and I have no doubt at all that God is not such, and it was so that he should not be believed to be such that I wrote that letter. In it, while I was anxious to admonish, I was excessive and incautious in reproving, though without naming names, and did not consider, as a brother and a bishop ought to have done, the person of a brother and a bishop. This I do not defend but blame; I do not excuse but accuse. Let me be pardoned, I ask; let him remember our old affection and forget the new offense. Let him at least do what he was angry with me for not doing: let him show gentleness in granting pardon, which I did not show in writing that letter. I ask this through Your Charity, which I would have wished to ask face to face, if I had had the opportunity of meeting him. When I attempted this, and a venerable man, to be preferred in honor to all of us, wrote to him, he would not come, suspecting perhaps some trick of mine, as I think, as human things mostly go. Assure him, as far as you can, that I am far from that; you can do it more easily in person. Tell him with how great and how genuine sorrow I spoke with you about the offense to his feelings. Let him know how far I am from despising him, and how much I fear God in him and think of our Head, in whose body we are brothers. I did not think I should come to the place where he lives, lest we make a spectacle to be laughed at by outsiders, grieved over by our own, and shameful to ourselves. Through Your Holiness and Charity the whole can be rightly managed; for it is managed by him who dwells by his faith in your heart, whom I believe he does not spurn in you, since he recognizes him in himself.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The venerable man is not named (probably the primate of Numidia, but this is uncertain). Christ dwelling in the heart by faith: Eph 3:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.4 (CSEL 44:334–335; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-4).

## Letter 148.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-5
- Source: CSEL 44:335–336
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine hopes for reconciliation in love and for peaceful inquiry; if love itself cannot be seen by bodily eyes, still less can God, its source.

### Latin text

Ego certe in hac causa, quid melius facerem, non inueni, quam ut ueniam peterem a fratre, qui laesum se litterarum mearum asperitate conquestus est. faciet et ipse, ut spero, quod sibi imperari nouit ab eo, qui per apostolum loquens ait: Donantes uobismet ipsis, si quis aduersus aliquem habet querelam, sicut et deus in Christo donauit uobis. estote ergo imitatores dei sicut filii dilectissimi et ambulate in caritate, sicut et Christus dilexit uos. in hac caritate ambulantes, si quid diligentius possumus, de spiritali corpore, quod in resurrectione habebimus, concorditer inquiramus, quia, et si quid aliter sapimus, hoc quoque nobis deus reuelabit, si in illo maneamus. qui autem manet in caritate, in deo manet et deus in illo manet, quia deus caritas est siue tamquam eius fons ineffabiliter existendo siue illam nobis per suum spiritum largiendo. si ergo doceri potest, quod caritas corporalibus oculis aliquando uidebitur, poterit fortassis et deus; si autem ista numquam poterit, multo minus ipse fons eius uel si quid dici excellentius et conuenientius de tanta re potest.

### English translation (Claude)

For my part, I found nothing better to do in this case than to ask pardon of the brother who complained that he was hurt by the harshness of my letter. He too will do, I hope, what he knows is commanded him by the one who says, speaking through the apostle: “Forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another, as God in Christ forgave you. Be imitators of God, therefore, as dearly beloved children, and walk in love, as Christ also loved you.” Walking in this love, let us inquire in harmony, if we can do so more carefully, about the spiritual body which we shall have in the resurrection; because, if we think otherwise in anything, God will reveal this too to us, if we abide in him. And he who abides in love abides in God and God in him, because God is love, whether as existing ineffably as its fountain, or as bestowing it on us through his Spirit. If, then, it can be taught that love will someday be seen with bodily eyes, perhaps God too can be; but if love can never be, much less can its very fountain, or whatever more excellent and fitting thing can be said of so great a matter.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:32: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:1: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:2: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 4:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 4:32; 5:1–2 (with Col 3:13); Phil 3:15; 1 John 4:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.5 (CSEL 44:335–336; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-5).

## Letter 148.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-6
- Source: CSEL 44:336–337
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Ambrose's commentary on Luke: Christ, the Spirit, and the Father are invisible in their divinity and seen only by spiritual eyes or in assumed forms.

### Latin text

Magni quidam uiri et in scripturis sanctis doctissimi, qui plurimum ecclesiam et bona studia fidelium suis litteris adiuuerunt, ubi eis occasio data est, dixerunt inuisibilem deum inuisibiliter uideri, hoc est per eam naturam, quae in nobis quoque inuisibilis est, munda scilicet mente uel corde. beatus Ambrosius cum de Christo ageret secundum id, quod uerbum est: Non enim corporalibus, inquit, sed spiritalibus oculis Iesus uidetur; et paulo post: Non eum uiderunt, inquit, Iudaei; obcaecatum enim erat insipiens cor eorum hinc ostendens, unde uideatur. item cum de spiritu sancto loqueretur, interposuit uerba domini dicentis: Rogabo patrem et alium paraclitum dabit uobis, qui uobiscum sit in aeternum, spiritum ueritatis, quem hic mundus non potest accipere, quia non uidet eum nec cognoscit eum. merito ergo se, inquit, in corpore demonstrauit, quoniam in diuinitatis substantia non uidetur. uidimus spiritum sed in specie corporali; uideamus et patrem, sed, quia uidere non possumus, audiamus. et paulo post: Audiamus ergo, inquit, patrem, inuisibilis enim pater; sed et filius inuisibilis secundum diuinitatem, deum enim nemo uidit umquam; cum ergo filius deus, in eo utique, quod deus est, filius non uidetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Certain great men, most learned in the holy Scriptures, who have greatly helped the Church and the good studies of the faithful by their writings, have said, when occasion was given them, that the invisible God is seen invisibly, that is, by that nature which is invisible in us too, namely by a pure mind or heart. Blessed Ambrose, when he was treating of Christ as the Word, says: “For Jesus is seen not with bodily but with spiritual eyes”; and a little later: “The Jews did not see him,” he says, “for their foolish heart was darkened,” showing from this by what he is seen. Again, when he spoke of the Holy Spirit, he inserted the words of the Lord saying: “I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Paraclete, to be with you for ever, the Spirit of truth, whom this world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him.” “Rightly, then,” he says, “he showed himself in a body, since in the substance of the Godhead he is not seen. We have seen the Spirit, but in bodily form; let us see the Father too, but, since we cannot see him, let us hear him.” And a little later: “Let us hear the Father, then,” he says, “for the Father is invisible; but the Son too is invisible according to his divinity, for no one has ever seen God; since, then, the Son is God, in that he is God the Son is not seen.”

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:17: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotations are from Ambrose, Exposition of the Gospel of Luke (1.5 and 2.94, as commonly identified; uncertain). Scripture: Rom 1:21; John 14:16–17; John 1:18. The reference to the Jews is translated as written.
- The staged text is garbled at “merito ergo se …”; translated by the evident sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.6 (CSEL 44:336–337; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-6).

## Letter 148.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-7
- Source: CSEL 44:337–338
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome teaches that no creature, not even angels, sees God's nature, and that we shall see 'face to face' only in the sense of becoming like the angels.

### Latin text

Sanctus autem Hieronymus ait: Videre deum, sicuti est, in natura sua oculus hominis non potest, non solum homo nec angeli nec Throni nec Potestates nec Dominationes nec omne nomen, quod nominatur; neque enim creatura potest aspicere creatorem suum. his uerbis uir doctissimus satis ostendit, quid etiam de futuro saeculo senserit, quod ad hanc rem adtinet. quantum libet enim oculi corporis nostri mutentur in melius, angelorum oculis aequabuntur. hic autem et ipsis et uniuersae omnino caelesti creaturae inuisibilem naturam dixit esse creatoris. aut si et hinc fit quaestio et infertur ulla dubitatio, utrum non simus futuri angelis potiores, ipsius domini est hinc aperta sententia, ubi ait de resurrecturis in regnum: Erunt aequales angelis dei. unde idem ipse sanctus Hieronymus alibi sic dicit: Homo igitur dei faciem uidere non potest; angeli autem etiam minimorum in ecclesia semper uident faciem dei. et nunc in speculo uidemus, in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem, quando de hominibus in angelos profecerimus et potuerimus cum apostolo dicere: Nos autem omnes reuelata facie gloriam domini speculantes in eandem imaginem transformamur a gloria in gloriam tamquam a domini spiritu, licet faciem dei iuxta naturae suae proprietatem nulla uideat creatura et tunc mente cernatur, quando inuisibilis creditur.

### English translation (Claude)

And holy Jerome says: “The eye of man cannot see God as he is in his nature; and not only man, but neither angels, nor Thrones, nor Powers, nor Dominions, nor every name that is named; for the creature cannot behold its Creator.” By these words this most learned man shows clearly enough what he thought of the age to come too, as far as this matter is concerned. For however much the eyes of our body may be changed for the better, they will be made equal to the eyes of the angels. But here he said that the nature of the Creator is invisible both to them and to the whole heavenly creation altogether. Or if a question arises here, and some doubt is raised whether we shall not be superior to the angels, the Lord’s own judgment on this is plain, where he says of those who will rise to the kingdom: “They will be equal to the angels of God.” Hence the same holy Jerome says elsewhere: “Man, therefore, cannot see the face of God; but the angels even of the least in the Church always see the face of God. And now we see in a mirror, in an enigma, but then face to face, when we have advanced from men to angels and can say with the apostle: ‘But we all, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord’; although no creature sees the face of God according to the property of his nature, and he is then discerned by the mind, when he is believed invisible.”

### Scripture references

- Col 1:16: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 20:36: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 18:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotations are from Jerome’s Commentary on Isaiah (on Isa 1:1 and 1:10–14? the exact places are uncertain). Scripture: Col 1:16; Eph 1:21; Luke 20:36; Matt 18:10; 1 Cor 13:12; 2 Cor 3:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.7 (CSEL 44:337–338; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-7).

## Letter 148.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-8
- Source: CSEL 44:338–339
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine draws from Jerome that 'face to face' refers to the unveiled face of the heart, and that God's nature remains invisible to all bodily sight, heavenly or earthly.

### Latin text

In his uerbis hominis dei multa consideranda sunt: primum quia secundum apertissimam domini sententiam etiam ipse sentit tunc nos uisuros faciem dei, cum in angelos profecerimus, id est aequales aequales facti fuerimus, quod erit utique in resurrectione mortuorum. deinde apostolico testimonio satis aperuit non exterioris sed interioris hominis faciem intellegendam, cum uidebimus facie ad faciem; de facie quippe cordis loquebatur apostolus, cum diceret, quod hinc commemorauit: Nos autem reuelata facie gloriam domini speculantes in eandem imaginem transformamur. quod si quisquam dubitat, recenseat eundem locum et adtendat, unde apostolus loquebatur, de uelamine scilicet, quod manet in lectione ueteris testamenti, donec quisque transeat ad Christum, ut auferatur uelamen. ibi quippe dicit: Nos autem reuelata facie gloriam domini speculantes, quae facies in Iudaeis non erat reuelata, de quibus dicit: Velamen super cor eorum positum est, ut ostendat cordis faciem nobis esse reuelatam uelamine ablato. postremo, ne quisquam ista minus intuens minusque discernens uisibilem deum uel angelis uel hominibus, cum aequales angelis facti fuerimus, siue nunc esse siue futurum esse crederet, euidentissime, quid sentiret, expressit dicens, quod faciem dei iuxta naturae suae proprietatem nulla uideat creatura et tunc mente cernatur, quando inuisibilis creditur. unde sufficienter significauit, quando uisus est ab hominibus per oculos corporis tamquam ipse corporeus, non eum secundum naturae suae proprietatem fuisse uisum, in qua tunc mente cernitur, quando inuisibilis creditur. quibus inuisibilis nisi aspectibus corporalibus etiam caelestibus, sicut supra de angelis et Potestatibus et Dominationibus dixit, quanto magis terrestribus?

### English translation (Claude)

In these words of the man of God many things are to be considered. First, that, following the Lord’s very plain statement, he too holds that we shall see the face of God when we have advanced to the angels, that is, when we have been made equal to them, which will certainly be in the resurrection of the dead. Second, that by the apostle’s testimony he showed clearly enough that the face of the inner man, not the outer, is to be understood when we shall see face to face; for the apostle was speaking of the face of the heart when he said what Jerome quoted here: “But we, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image.” If anyone doubts this, let him go over the same passage and note what the apostle was speaking of: namely, the veil that remains in the reading of the Old Testament until each one passes over to Christ, so that the veil is taken away. For there he says, “But we, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord,” a face which was not unveiled in the Jews, of whom he says, “A veil is laid over their heart,” so as to show that the face of the heart is unveiled for us when the veil is removed. Finally, so that no one who considers and distinguishes these things less carefully might believe that God is or will be visible either to angels or to men when we have been made equal to the angels, he expressed most clearly what he thought, saying that “no creature sees the face of God according to the property of his nature, and he is then discerned by the mind, when he is believed invisible.” By this he indicated sufficiently that, when he was seen by men through the eyes of the body as though he himself were corporeal, he was not seen according to the property of his nature, in which he is discerned by the mind when he is believed invisible. Invisible to what but to bodily sights, even heavenly ones, as he said above of angels and Powers and Dominions? How much more to earthly ones?

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:14: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The staged text repeats aequales (“equal equal”), evidently a slip for aequales angelis; translated by sense. 2 Cor 3:14–18. The reference to the Jews follows Paul and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.8 (CSEL 44:338–339; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-8).

## Letter 148.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-9
- Source: CSEL 44:339–340
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome's statement that the Trinity is seen only by the eyes of the mind, with the promise of Matthew 5:8, excludes any bodily vision of God even in the future.

### Latin text

Unde alio loco euidentius dicit: Non solum patris diuinitatem sed ne filii quidem et spiritus sancti, quae una in trinitate natura est, posse oculos carnis aspicere sed oculos mentis, de quibus ipse saluator ait: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt. quid hac manifestatione lucidius? si enim tantum modo dixisset nec patris nec filii nec spiritus sancti diuinitatem posse oculos carnis aspicere nec deinceps addidisset sed oculos mentis, forte diceretur carnem iam non esse appellandam, cum corpus fuerit spiritale. addendo ergo et dicendo sed oculos mentis ab omni genere corporis alienauit huius modi uisionem. ne quis autem putaret eum tantum de praesenti tempore locutum, subiecit etiam domini testimonium uolens ostendere, quos dixerat oculos mentis, quo testimonio non praesentis sed futurae uisionis promissio declaratur: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence he says more clearly in another place: “Not only the divinity of the Father but not even that of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, which is one nature in the Trinity, can the eyes of the flesh behold, but the eyes of the mind, of which the Savior himself says, ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’” What could be clearer than this declaration? For if he had said only that the eyes of the flesh cannot behold the divinity of the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit, and had not then added “but the eyes of the mind,” it might perhaps be said that it should no longer be called flesh when it has become a spiritual body. By adding and saying “but the eyes of the mind,” he removed such a vision from every kind of body. And so that no one should think he spoke only of the present time, he also added the Lord’s testimony, wishing to show what he called the eyes of the mind; and by this testimony the promise not of a present but of a future vision is declared: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotation is from Jerome, Commentary on Isaiah (on Isa 6:1, as commonly identified); it is also quoted in Letter 147.53. Matt 5:8.
- Trinitarian passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.9 (CSEL 44:339–340; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-9).

## Letter 148.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-10
- Source: CSEL 44:340–341
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Athanasius and Gregory also teach that the whole Trinity is invisible by nature and was seen only through assumed creatures, agreeing with Ambrose.

### Latin text

Beatissimus quoque Athanasius, Alexandrinus episcopus, cum ageret aduersus Arrianos, qui tantum modo deum patrem inuisibilem dicunt, filium uero et spiritum sanctum uisibiles putant, aequalem trinitatis inuisibilitatem scripturarum sanctarum testimoniis et diligentia suae disputationis adseruit instantissime suadens deum non esse uisum nisi adsumptione creaturae, secundum deitatis autem suae proprietatem omnino deum esse inuisibilem, id est patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum, nisi quantum mente ac spiritu nosci potest Gregorius etiam, sanctus episcopus orientalis, apertissime dicit deum natura inuisibilem, quando patribus uisus est sicut Moysi, cum quo facie ad faciem loquebatur, alicuius conspicabilis materiae dispositione adsumpta salua sua inuisibilitate uideri potuisse. hoc est, quod etiam noster dicit Ambrosius et patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum ea specie uideri, quam uoluntas elegerit, non natura formauerit, ut et illud uerum sit, quod deum nemo uidit umquam, quae uox ipsius domini Christi est, et: Quem nemo hominum uidit nec uidere potest, quae uox apostoli, immo eius per apostolum Christi est, et illa non repudientur testimonia scripturarum, quibus deus uisus esse narratur, quia et inuisibilis est per propriam deitatis naturam et, cum uult, uideri potest per adsumptam, sicut placuerit, creaturam.

### English translation (Claude)

Most blessed Athanasius too, bishop of Alexandria, when he was arguing against the Arians, who say that only God the Father is invisible but think the Son and the Holy Spirit visible, asserted the equal invisibility of the Trinity by testimonies of the holy Scriptures and by the care of his argument, urging most insistently that God was not seen except by the assumption of a creature, but that according to the property of his Godhead God is altogether invisible, that is, Father and Son and Holy Spirit, except so far as he can be known by mind and spirit. Gregory too, a holy bishop of the East, says most plainly that God, invisible by nature, when he was seen by the fathers, as by Moses, with whom he spoke face to face, could be seen by taking on the arrangement of some visible matter, while his invisibility remained intact. This is what our Ambrose also says, that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are seen in that form which the will has chosen, not which nature has formed; so that both that is true, that no one has ever seen God, which is the voice of the Lord Christ himself, and “whom no one of men has seen or can see,” which is the voice of the apostle, or rather of Christ through the apostle; and those testimonies of the Scriptures are not rejected in which God is related to have been seen, because he is both invisible by the proper nature of the Godhead and, when he wills, can be seen through a creature assumed as he pleases.

### Scripture references

- Exod 33:11: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The writings of Athanasius and of Gregory (of Nazianzus or of Nyssa) meant here are not identified with certainty. Exod 33:11; John 1:18; 1 Tim 6:16. Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.25 (see 147.18).
- Trinitarian and anti-Arian passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.10 (CSEL 44:340–341; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-10).

## Letter 148.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-11
- Source: CSEL 44:341–342
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's invisibility, like his incorruptibility, is eternal; the children of God will see him, but as invisible things are seen, by the eyes of the heart.

### Latin text

Porro si naturae ipsius est inuisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas, non mutabitur utique in futuro saeculo illa natura, ut de inuisibili uisibilis fiat, quia neque poterit de incorruptibili corruptibilis fieri; simul enim et incommutabilis est. et utique naturam eius commendauit apostolus, cum duo ista simul poneret dicens: Regi autem saeculorum, inuisibili, incorruptibili soli deo honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum. unde non audeo ego ita distinguere, ut dicam; Incorruptibili quidem in saecula saeculorum, inuisibili autem non in saecula saeculorum sed tantum in hoc saeculo. uerum quia nec illa testimonia falsa esse possunt: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, et: Scimus, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est, negare non possumus filios dei uisuros deum, sed sicut uidentur inuisibilia, sicut se ipsum ostensurum promittebat, qui hominibus in carne uisibilis apparebat, quando dicebat: Et ego diligam eum et ostendam me ipsum illi, cum ante oculos hominum conspicuus loqueretur. unde autem inuisibilia uidentur nisi oculis cordis, de quibus paulo ante dixi, quid Hieronymus senserit ad uidendum deum?

### English translation (Claude)

Further, if invisibility belongs to his very nature, as incorruptibility does, that nature will certainly not be changed in the age to come so as to become visible from invisible, because neither will it be able to become corruptible from incorruptible; for it is also unchangeable. And certainly the apostle was commending his nature when he put these two together, saying: “To the King of the ages, invisible, incorruptible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.” Hence I do not dare to make the distinction of saying, “Incorruptible for ever and ever, but invisible not for ever and ever, but only in this age.” But since those testimonies too cannot be false, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and, “We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is,” we cannot deny that the children of God will see God; but as invisible things are seen, as he promised he would show himself, who appeared visible to men in the flesh, when he said, “And I will love him and show myself to him,” while he spoke in plain view before men’s eyes. And by what are invisible things seen but by the eyes of the heart, about which I said a little earlier what Jerome thought concerning the seeing of God?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 1:17; Matt 5:8; 1 John 3:2; John 14:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.11 (CSEL 44:341–342; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-11).

## Letter 148.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-12
- Source: CSEL 44:342–343
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Ambrose taught that only the pure in heart will see God in the resurrection; the wicked do not truly wish to see him, since they will not cleanse their hearts by faith working through love.

### Latin text

Hinc est, quod etiam memoratus Mediolanensis episcopus in ipsa resurrectione dixit non facile esse deum uidere nisi his, qui mundo sunt corde, et ideo scriptum esse: Beati mundo corde, quia ipsi deum uidebunt. quantos beatos, inquit, iam numerauerat et tamen eis uidendi deum non promiserat facultatem! deinde adiungit et dicit: Si ergo hi, qui mundo sunt corde, deum uidebunt, utique alii non uidebunt. et ne alios illos acciperemus, de quibus dictum est: Beati pauperes, beati mites et cetera, continuo subiunxit: Neque enim indigni deum uidebunt, indignos utique illos uolens intellegi, qui licet resurgant, deum uidere non poterunt, quoniam ad damnationem resurgent, quia per fidem ueram, quae per dilectionem operatur, cor mundare noluerunt. et ideo sequitur et dicit: neque is, qui deum uidere noluerit, potest deum uidere. deinde, quia occurrebat etiam omnes impios uelle deum uidere, statim, ut ostenderet, qua re dixerit qui deum uidere noluerit, quia utique illo modo non uult deum uidere impius, quia cor mundare non uult, quo ille uideri poterit, secutus adiunxit et ait: Nec in loco deus uidetur sed mundo corde nec corporalibus oculis deus quaeritur nec circumscribitur uisu nec tactu tenetur nec auditur affatu nec sentitur incessu. quibus uerbis beatus Ambrosius uoluit admonere, quid debeant homines praeparare, qui deum uolunt uidere, hoc est cor mundare per fidem, quae per dilectionem operatur, dono spiritus sancti, unde pignus accepimus, quo illam uisionem desiderare nouerimus.

### English translation (Claude)

That is why the bishop of Milan mentioned above also said that in the resurrection itself it is not easy to see God except for those who are pure in heart, and that therefore it is written, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” “How many,” he says, “had he already numbered as blessed, and yet he had not promised them the ability to see God!” Then he adds and says: “If, then, those who are pure in heart will see God, others certainly will not see him.” And so that we should not take those others to be the ones of whom it was said, “Blessed are the poor, blessed are the meek,” and so on, he added at once: “For neither will the unworthy see God,” meaning by the unworthy those who, though they rise, will not be able to see God, since they will rise to condemnation, because they would not cleanse their hearts by the true faith which works through love. And so he goes on to say: “nor can he who has not wished to see God see God.” Then, since it occurred to him that all the wicked wish to see God, at once, to show why he had said “he who has not wished to see God” (because the wicked man certainly does not wish to see God in that way, since he will not cleanse the heart by which he could be seen), he went on to add: “Nor is God seen in a place, but by a pure heart; nor is God sought with bodily eyes, nor bounded by sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by speech, nor perceived by gait.” By these words blessed Ambrose wished to remind us what people who wish to see God ought to prepare: that is, to cleanse the heart by faith working through love, by the gift of the Holy Spirit, from whom we have received the pledge by which we may learn to long for that vision.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ambrose, Exposition of Luke 1.27 (see 147.18). Matt 5:3–8; faith working through love: Gal 5:6; the pledge of the Spirit: 2 Cor 1:22; 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.12 (CSEL 44:342–343; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-12).

## Letter 148.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-13
- Source: CSEL 44:343
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture's references to God's limbs, like his wings, are to be understood spiritually, as all opponents of the Anthropomorphites hold.

### Latin text

Nam de membris dei, quae assidue scriptura commemorat, ne quisquam secundum carnis huius formam et figuram nos esse crederet similes deo, propterea eadem scriptura et alas habere deum dixit, quas nos utique non habemus. sicut ergo, alas cum audimus, protectionem intellegimus, sic et, cum audimus manus, operationem intellegere debemus et, cum audimus pedes, praesentationem et, cum audimus oculos, uisionem, qua cognoscit, et, cum audimus faciem, notitiam, qua innotescit; et si quid aliud eadem scriptura tale commemorat, puto spiritaliter intellegendum neque hoc ego tantum aut ego prior sed omnes, qui qualicumque spiritali intellegentia resistunt eis, qui ob hoc anthropomorphi nominantur. ex quorum litteris ne multa commemorando maiores moras faciam, hoc unum sancti Hieronymi interpono, ut nouerit iste frater non se de hac re mecum magis quam cum prioribus agere debere, si quid eum contra permouet.

### English translation (Claude)

For as to the members of God, which Scripture constantly mentions, so that no one should believe that we are like God according to the form and shape of this flesh, the same Scripture also said that God has wings, which we certainly do not have. Just as, then, when we hear of wings we understand protection, so also when we hear of hands we ought to understand working; when we hear of feet, presence; when we hear of eyes, the sight by which he knows; when we hear of a face, the knowledge by which he makes himself known; and whatever else of this kind the same Scripture mentions I think is to be understood spiritually. Nor do I alone think this, or first, but all those who, with whatever spiritual understanding, resist those who for this reason are called Anthropomorphites. Of their writings, so as not to cause greater delay by quoting many, I insert this one passage of holy Jerome, so that this brother may know that, if anything moves him against this, he must take the matter up not with me more than with those before us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 17:8 (16:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 91:4 (90:4 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- God's wings: e.g. Ps 17:8; 91:4. The Anthropomorphites held that God has a human bodily form.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.13 (CSEL 44:343; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-13).

## Letter 148.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-14
- Source: CSEL 44:343–344
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Jerome on Psalm 94: God has no bodily members, but is all eye, all hand, all foot, in that he sees, works, and is present everywhere.

### Latin text

Cum ergo ille uir in scripturis doctissimus psalmum exponeret, ubi dictum est: Intellegite ergo, qui insipientes estis in populo, et stulti aliquando sapite. qui plantauit aurem, non audiet? aut, qui finxit oculum, non considerat? inter cetera: Iste locus, inquit, aduersus eos maxime facit, qui anthropomorphi sunt, qui dicunt deum habere membra, quae etiam nos habemus. uerbi causa dicitur deus habere oculos: oculi domini respiciunt omnia; manus domini facit omnia; et audiuit, inquit, Adam sonum pedum domini deambulantis in paradiso. haec simpliciter audiunt et humanas inbecillitates ad dei magnificentiam referunt. ego autem dico, quod deus totus oculus est, totus manus est, totus pes est. totus oculus est, quia omnia uidet; totus manus est, quia omnia operatur; totus pes est, quia ubique est ergo uidete, quid dicat: Qui plantauit aurem, non audiet? et non dixit qui plantauit, ergo ipse aurem non habet; non dixit ergo ipse oculos non habet; sed quid dixit? qui plantauit aurem, non audiet? qui finxit oculum, non considerat? membra tulit, efficientias dedit).

### English translation (Claude)

When, then, that man most learned in the Scriptures was expounding the psalm where it is said, “Understand, then, you who are foolish among the people, and you fools, be wise at last. He who planted the ear, will he not hear? Or he who formed the eye, does he not consider?” he said among other things: “This passage tells most of all against those who are Anthropomorphites, who say that God has members such as we also have. For example, God is said to have eyes: the eyes of the Lord look upon all things; the hand of the Lord makes all things; and Adam heard, it says, the sound of the feet of the Lord walking in paradise. They hear these things simply and attribute human weaknesses to the majesty of God. But I say that God is all eye, all hand, all foot. All eye, because he sees all things; all hand, because he works all things; all foot, because he is everywhere. So see what he says: ‘He who planted the ear, will he not hear?’ And he did not say, ‘He who planted it, therefore he himself does not have an ear’; he did not say, ‘therefore he himself does not have eyes.’ But what did he say? ‘He who planted the ear, will he not hear? He who formed the eye, does he not consider?’ He took away the members, he gave the powers.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 94:8 (93:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:9 (93:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 15:3: allusion, low confidence
- Gen 3:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome, Homilies on the Psalms (on Ps 93/94), as commonly identified. Ps 94:8–9 (LXX 93:8–9); “the eyes of the Lord …”: cf. Prov 15:3; Gen 3:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.14 (CSEL 44:343–344; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-14).

## Letter 148.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-15
- Source: CSEL 44:344–345
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Fathers' writings, though not canonical Scripture, agree with what Augustine firmly believes: God is incorporeal, indivisible, and invisible by nature, appearing only in assumed forms.

### Latin text

Haec omnia de litteris eorum et Latinorum et Graecorum, qui priores nobis in catholica ecclesia uiuentes diuina eloquia tractauerunt, ideo commemoranda arbitratus sum, ut sciat iste frater, si quid aliter quam isti sentit, deposita dissensionis amaritudine et fraternae caritatis suauitate in integrum restituta atque seruata diligenti et tranquilla consideratione quaerendum uel discendum uel docendum. neque enim quorumlibet disputationes quamuis catholicorum et laudatorum hominum uelut scripturas canonicas habere debemus, ut nobis non liceat salua honorificentia, quae illis debetur hominibus, aliquid in eorum scriptis inprobare atque respuere, si forte inuenerimus, quod aliter senserint, quam ueritas habet diuino adiutorio uel ab aliis intellecta uel a nobis. talis ego sum in scriptis aliorum, tales uolo esse intellectores meorum. denique in his omnibus, quae de opusculis sanctorum atque doctorum commemoraui, Ambrosii, Hieronymi, Athanasii, Gregorii, et si qua aliorum talia legere potui, quae commemorare longum putaui, deum non esse corpus nec formae humanae habere membra nec eum esse per locorum spatia diuisibilem et esse natura incommutabiliter inuisibilem nec per eandem naturam atque substantiam sed adsumpta uisibili specie, sicut uoluit, apparuisse, quibus apparuit, quando per corporis oculos in scripturis sanctis uisus esse narratur, in adiutorio domini inconcusse credo et, quantum ipse donat, intellego.

### English translation (Claude)

I thought all these things should be quoted from the writings of both Latins and Greeks who, living before us in the Catholic Church, expounded the divine utterances, so that this brother may know that, if he thinks anything otherwise than they, it must be sought, learned, or taught by careful and calm consideration, the bitterness of dissension laid aside and the sweetness of brotherly love fully restored and preserved. For we ought not to treat the discussions of any men, however Catholic and praiseworthy, as canonical Scriptures, so that we may not, with due respect to those men, disapprove and reject something in their writings, if we happen to find that they thought otherwise than the truth holds, as understood either by others or by us with divine help. Such am I toward the writings of others; such I wish the readers of mine to be. Finally, in all these things I have quoted from the works of holy and learned men, Ambrose, Jerome, Athanasius, Gregory, and whatever similar things of others I have been able to read, which I thought it too long to quote, I believe unshakeably with the Lord’s help, and understand as far as he grants, that God is not a body, nor has members of human form, nor is divisible through spaces of places, and that he is by nature unchangeably invisible, and that he appeared to those to whom he appeared, when he is related in the holy Scriptures to have been seen through the eyes of the body, not by that same nature and substance but by taking on a visible form, as he willed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.15 (CSEL 44:344–345; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-15).

## Letter 148.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-16
- Source: CSEL 44:345–346
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine confesses he has found no satisfactory teaching on the nature of the spiritual body, though he inclines to think it will remain bodily in substance.

### Latin text

De spiritali autem corpore, quod in resurrectione habebimus, quantam capiat in melius commutationem, utrum in simplicitatem spiritus cedat, ut totus homo iam spiritus sit, an, quod magis puto, sed nondum plena fiducia confirmo, ita futurum sit spiritale corpus, ut propter quandam ineffabilem facilitatem spiritale dicatur, seruet tamen substantiam corporalem, quae per se ipsam uiuere ac sentire non possit sed per illum, qui ea utitur, spiritum — neque enim et nunc, quia corpus dicitur animale, eadem est animae natura quae corporis —, et utrum, si corporis quamuis iam inmortalis atque incorruptibilis natura seruabitur, adiuuet tunc aliquid spiritum ad uidenda ipsa uisibilia, id est corporalia, sicut nunc tale aliquid nisi per corpus uidere non possumus, an uero etiam sine organo corporis ualeat tunc spiritus noster nosse corporalia — neque enim et deus talia per sensus corporis nouit — et multa alia, quae in hac quaestione mouere possunt, fateor me nondum alicubi legisse, quod mihi sufficere existimarem siue ad discendum siue ad docendum.

### English translation (Claude)

But as to the spiritual body which we shall have in the resurrection: how great a change for the better it admits; whether it passes into the simplicity of spirit, so that the whole man is then spirit, or (as I rather think, but do not yet affirm with full confidence) the spiritual body will be such that it is called spiritual because of a certain ineffable ease, yet will keep a bodily substance, which cannot live and perceive by itself but through the spirit that uses it (for even now, because the body is called natural [animal], the nature of the soul is not the same as that of the body); and whether, if the nature of the body, though now immortal and incorruptible, is preserved, it will then help the spirit somewhat to see visible, that is, bodily, things, as now we cannot see anything of that kind except through the body, or whether our spirit will then be able to know bodily things even without the instrument of the body (for God too does not know such things through bodily senses); and many other things that may arise in this question: I confess that I have not yet read anywhere anything I thought sufficient for me, either for learning or for teaching.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:44: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Natural” renders animale (from anima, soul), as in 1 Cor 15:44.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.16 (CSEL 44:345–346; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-16).

## Letter 148.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-17
- Source: CSEL 44:346–347
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever the risen body's powers, the vision of God by the inner man is certain, since God will be all in all and fill the saints within.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc, si non displicet huic fratri mea qualiscumque cautela, interim, propter quod scriptum est: Quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est, quantum possumus, cor mundum ad illam uisionem ipso adiuuante praeparemus. de corpore autem spiritali pacatius et diligentius inquiramus, ne forte aliquid certum ac liquidum, si nobis hoc utile esse nouit, secundum scripturas suas deus demonstrare dignetur. si enim hoc inuenerit inquisitio diligentior, tantam futuram corporis mutationem, ut possit uidere inuisibilia, non, ut opinor, talis potentia corporis menti auferet uisionem, ut exterior homo deum uidere tunc possit, non possit interior, quasi tantum foris sit deus ad hominem et intus non sit in homine, cum apertissime scriptum sit: Ut sit deus omnia in omnibus, aut ita sit intus ille, qui sine ullis locorum spatiis ubique totus est, ut foris tantum uideri ab exteriore homine possit, intus autem ab interiore non possit. quae si absurdissime sentiuntur — magis enim sancti pleni erunt deo, non inanes intrinsecus ab illo circumdabuntur extrinsecus nec caeci intrinsecus eum, quo pleni erunt, non uidebunt et tantum forinsecus oculati eum, quo circumdabuntur, uidebunt —, restat, ut interim de uisione dei secundum interiorem hominem certissimi simus. si autem etiam corpus mira commutatione hoc ualuerit, aliud accedet, non illud abscedet.

### English translation (Claude)

And so, if this brother is not displeased with my caution, such as it is, let us meanwhile, because of what is written, “for we shall see him as he is,” prepare a pure heart for that vision as far as we can, with his help. And let us inquire more peaceably and carefully about the spiritual body, in case God may deign to show us something certain and clear according to his Scriptures, if he knows this to be useful for us. For if more careful inquiry finds that the change of the body will be so great that it can see invisible things, such a power of the body will not, I think, take vision away from the mind, so that the outer man could then see God while the inner man could not; as if God were only outside man and not within man, when it is most plainly written, “that God may be all in all”; or as if he who is everywhere whole without any spaces of places were within in such a way that he could be seen outside by the outer man but not within by the inner man. If these things are most absurd to think (for the saints will rather be full of God, not empty within and surrounded by him without; nor will they, blind within, fail to see him with whom they will be full, and, having eyes only on the outside, see him by whom they will be surrounded), it remains that meanwhile we should be most certain about the vision of God according to the inner man. But if the body too, by a wonderful change, is able to do this, something will be added; that will not be taken away.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 3:2; 1 Cor 15:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.17 (CSEL 44:346–347; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-17).

## Letter 148.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-18
- Source: CSEL 44:347–348
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The inner man, who now sees love and peace, will see God; the resurrection of the body is certain, its qualities still open; Augustine again asks Fortunatianus to win him pardon.

### Latin text

Melius ergo id adfirmamus, unde minime dubitamus, quod homo interior uidebit deum, qui modo solus potest uidere caritatem, quae cum laudaretur, dictum est: Deus caritas est, solus potest uidere pacem et sanctificationem, sine qua nemo poterit uidere deum. neque enim caritatem, pacem, sanctificationem et si qua similia uidet modo ullus oculus carnis; quae tamen omnia iam uidet, quantum potest, oculus mentis tanto purius quanto purior, ut sine dubitatione deum nos uisuros esse credamus, siue inueniamus siue non inueniamus, quod de qualitate futuri corporis quaerimus, cum tamen corpus resurrecturum et inmortale atque incorruptibile futurum non ambigamus, quoniam hinc sanctarum scripturarum sententias apertissimas firmissimasque retinemus. si autem iste frater, quod de spiritali corpore adhuc requiro, iam sibi firmat esse certissimum, nisi placidus audiero docentem ita, ut ille quoque placidus me audiat inquirentem, habebit, unde iure suscenseat. nunc tamen per Christum obsecro, ut de illa asperitate litterarum mearum, qua eum non inmerito offensum esse didici, ueniam mihi ab illo impetres et me rescriptis domino adiuuante laetifices.

### English translation (Claude)

We do better, then, to affirm what we do not doubt at all: that the inner man will see God, the inner man who alone can now see love (in whose praise it was said, “God is love”), who alone can see peace and holiness, without which no one will be able to see God. For no eye of the flesh now sees love, peace, holiness, and the like; yet the eye of the mind already sees all these, as far as it can, the more purely the purer it is; so that we may believe without doubt that we shall see God, whether or not we find what we are seeking about the quality of the future body, while we have no doubt that the body will rise and be immortal and incorruptible, since on this we hold the plainest and firmest statements of the holy Scriptures. But if this brother already holds as most certain what I am still inquiring about the spiritual body, he will have just cause for anger if I do not listen calmly to him teaching, so that he too may listen calmly to me inquiring. Now, however, I beg you through Christ to obtain for me from him pardon for that harshness of my letter, by which I have learned that he was not without reason offended, and to gladden me, with the Lord’s help, by a reply.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 4:8, 16; Heb 12:14; the resurrection body: 1 Cor 15:42, 53.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 148.18 (CSEL 44:347–348; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-148-18).

## Letter 149.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-149-1
- Source: CSEL 44:348–349
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Paulinus of Nola for news of the presbyter Quintus's safe arrival and approves a charitable plan Paulinus had mentioned.

### Latin text

Quod de peruentione tam prospera fratris et conpresbyteri nostri Quinti et qui cum eo nauigauerunt cito nos dominus exhilarauit nuntiantibus litteris sanctitatis tuae, gratias agens ei, qui recreat afflictos et humiles consolatur, et sinceritati cordis tui occasione filii et condiaconi nostri Rufini, quae proxima occurrit, nunc rescripta persoluo; de litore Hipponiensi namque profectus est. et adprobo misericordiae consilium, quod tibi dominus inspirauit mihique insinuare dignatus es. ipse et hoc adiuuet, ipse prosperet, qui iam curam nostram ex magna parte leniuit, quia peruectus et commendatus est carissimus homo non solum bonis operibus sed etiam sanctis orationibus tuis.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord soon gladdened us about the very prosperous arrival of our brother and fellow presbyter Quintus and those who sailed with him, through the letter of Your Holiness bringing the news. Giving thanks to him who refreshes the afflicted and comforts the lowly, I now pay my reply to the sincerity of your heart by the nearest opportunity that has offered, our son and fellow deacon Rufinus; for he has set out from the shore of Hippo. And I approve the plan of mercy which the Lord inspired in you and which you were so kind as to make known to me. May he help this too, may he prosper it, who has already greatly relieved our anxiety, since our dearest friend has been carried safely over and commended not only by your good works but also by your holy prayers.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 7:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Paulinus of Nola (ca. 414); the address is not printed in the staged text. The plan of mercy is not further described.
- “Comforts the lowly”: 2 Cor 7:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.1 (CSEL 44:348–349; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/147-52/#p-149-1).

## Letter 149.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-2
- Source: CSEL 44:349–350
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that his earlier reply and a copy of his letter on the resurrection of the body apparently never reached Paulinus, and sends them again.

### Latin text

Litterae sane uenerationis tuae, ubi multa quaesisti et quaerenda admonuisti et quaerendo docuisti, ad me peruenerunt. sed quas ipse continuo rescripsi per homines eorundem sanctorum solaciorum nostrorum, sicut his tuis recentioribus comperi, non sunt redditae uenerationi tuae. in quibus quidem quatenus ad interrogata responderim, recolere non eualui nec earum exemplum cum requisissem, ubi hoc possem recognoscere, inueni. ad nonnulla me tamen respondisse certus omnino sum et ideo non ad omnia, quia, ut cito finirem, festinatio perlatoris urgebat. simul etiam miseram, sicut iusseras, et illius epistulae exemplum, quae tuae caritati apud Carthaginem de corporum resurrectione rescripseram, ubi de usu membrorum exorta erat quaestio. nunc ergo et hoc misi et alterum alterius; quia nec ipsam in manus tuas peruenisse conieci eo, quod iterum interrogasti quaedam, quae iam me in ea respondisse lego et agnosco. sed istam per quem direxerim, nescio. scripta quippe caritatis tuae, quibus eam reddidi, sicut etiam ipsa indicat, missa sunt mihi ab Hippone a nostris, cum essem apud sanctum fratrem et coepiscopum nostrum Bonifatium, — nam eorum perlatorem non uidi — et continuo rescripta non distuli.

### English translation (Claude)

The letter of Your Reverence, in which you asked many questions, pointed out others to be asked, and taught by asking, did reach me. But the reply I wrote at once, through men belonging to those same holy comforters of ours, has not been delivered to Your Reverence, as I have learned from this more recent letter of yours. How far I answered the questions in it I have not been able to recall, nor, when I looked for a copy of it, did I find one from which I could check. I am quite certain, however, that I answered some of them, and not all, because the haste of the carrier pressed me to finish quickly. I also sent at the same time, as you had asked, a copy of the letter I had written in reply to Your Charity at Carthage about the resurrection of bodies, where the question had arisen about the use of the members. So now I have sent this one and also the other; for I guessed that that one had not reached your hands either, because you have asked again certain things which I read and recognize that I had already answered in it. But by whom I sent it I do not know. For the letter of Your Charity to which I replied with it, as it itself indicates, was sent to me from Hippo by our people while I was with our holy brother and fellow bishop Boniface (for I did not see its carrier), and I did not delay to reply at once.

### Translation notes

- The letter on the resurrection of the body is Letter 95; the earlier reply that went astray is not certainly identified.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.2 (CSEL 44:349–350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-2).

## Letter 149.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-3
- Source: CSEL 44:350–351
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports the Greek readings of Psalm 17:14 ('destroying' or 'from a few') and interprets 'from a few' as the separation of unbelieving Israel from the believing remnant, the Church.

### Latin text

Quia ergo tunc, sicut scripsi, non potueram inspicere codices Graecos propter quaedam psalmi sexti decimi, inspexi postea, quos inueni. et unus habebat, quod et Latini nostri: Domine, perdens de terra dispertire eos; alius, sicut ipse posuisti: A paucis de terra. et illud quidem apertum habet sensum, perdens de terra, quam eis dedisti, dispertire eos in gentibus, quod et factum est eis, cum graui bello expugnati atque subuersi sunt. illud autem alterum quo modo accipiendum sit, non mihi occurrit, nisi quia in comparatione perditae multitudinis eorum reliquiae saluae factae sunt utique in paucis, a quibus eos dispertiendos, hoc est diuidendos atque separandos scriptura praenuntiauit dicens: Domine, a paucis, id est a reliquiis, quas ex illa gente saluas fecisti, de terra dispertire eos, ut terram intellegamus ecclesiam hereditatemque fidelium atque sanctorum, quae dicitur et terra uiuentium et quae illo etiam loco recte intellegi potest: Beati mites, quoniam ipsi hereditate possidebunt terram. cum autem dictum esset: A paucis de terra diuide eos, additum est in uita eorum, ut in manifesto futurum intellegeretur, dum hic uiuunt. separantur enim multi ab ecclesia, sed cum moriuntur, qui tamen cum uiuunt, per communionem sacramentorum unitatisque catholicae uidentur ecclesiae copulati. isti ergo diuisi sunt a paucis, qui ex illis crediderunt, de terra, quam sicut agrum suum excolit pater agricola, diuisi autem in uita sua, id est hic in manifesto, sicut uidemus. sequitur autem: Et de absconditis tuis adimpletus est uenter eorum, id est praeter hoc, quod in manifesto diuisi sunt, etiam de absconditis tuis, quae in occulto reddis conscientiae malorum, adimpletus est uenter eorum; uentrem posuit pro internorum latentiumque secretis.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, as I wrote, I had not been able at that time to examine Greek manuscripts on certain points in the sixteenth psalm, I examined afterward those I found. One had what our Latin copies have: “Lord, destroying them from the earth, divide them”; the other, as you yourself gave it: “From a few from the earth.” The former has an obvious sense: destroying them from the land which you gave them, divide them among the nations, which indeed happened to them when they were conquered and overthrown in a grievous war. How the other is to be taken does not occur to me, except that, in comparison with the multitude of them that perished, a remnant was saved, certainly among a few; and Scripture foretold that they were to be divided, that is, parted and separated, from these, saying: “Lord, from a few,” that is, from the remnant which you saved from that nation, “from the earth divide them”; so that we understand the earth to be the Church and the inheritance of the faithful and the saints, which is also called the land of the living, and which can rightly be understood in that place too: “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” And when it had been said, “From a few from the earth divide them,” there was added “in their life,” so that it would be understood to happen openly, while they live here. For many are separated from the Church only when they die, who nevertheless while they live seem joined to the Church by communion in the sacraments and in Catholic unity. These, then, were divided from the few of them who believed, from the land which the Father, the husbandman, cultivates as his field; and divided in their life, that is, openly here, as we see. Then follows: “And with your hidden things their belly has been filled”; that is, besides being openly divided, their belly has been filled also with your hidden things, which you render in secret to the conscience of the wicked; he put “belly” for the secrets of what is inward and hidden.

### Scripture references

- Ps 17:14 (16:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 27:13 (26:13 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's sixteenth psalm is Ps 17 in the English numbering; he discusses Ps 17:14 (LXX 16:14), where Greek manuscripts read ἀπολλύων (“destroying”) or ἀπὸ ὀλίγων (“from a few”).
- The land of the living: Ps 27:13 (LXX 26:13); Matt 5:5; the Father as husbandman: John 15:1. The reference to the Jewish people is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.3 (CSEL 44:350–351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-3).

## Letter 149.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-4
- Source: CSEL 44:351–352
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine prefers the reading 'filled with sons' to 'filled with pork' in Psalm 17:14, taking 'sons' as works by which the wicked are known, as good works are the twin offspring of love.

### Latin text

Quod uero sequitur: Saturati sunt porcina, iam, quid mihi ei hoc uideretur, aperui. sed quod alii codices habent et uerius habere perhibentur, quia diligentiora exemplaria per accentus notam eandem uerbi Graeci ambiguitatem Graeco scribendi more dissoluunt, obscurius est quidem, sed electiori sententiae uidetur aptius conuenire. quia enim dixerat: Et de absconditis tuis adimpletus est uenter eorum, quibus uerbis occulta dei iudicia significata sunt — occulta quippe sunt miseris, etiam qui gaudent in malis, quos tradidit deus in concupiscentias cordis eorum —, uelut quaereretur, unde possint cognosci, qui in abscondito ira dei adimpleti sunt, et responderetur, quod in euangelio dictum est: Ex fructibus eorum cognoscetis eos, continuo subiunctum est: Saturati sunt filiis, hoc est fructibus, quod euidentius dicitur operibus suis. unde alibi legitur: Ecce parturiuit iniustitiam, concepit dolorem et peperit iniquitatem et alibi: Dein concupiscentia cum conceperit, parit peccatum. mali ergo filii mala opera, quibus cognoscuntur et qui de absconditis dei iudiciis internis cogitationum suarum tamquam in uentrem adimpleti sunt; bona opera boni filii sunt, unde ad sponsam ecclesiam dicitur: Dentes tui sicut grex detonsarum ascendens de lauacro, quae omnes geminos creant et sterilis non est in illis. in quo gemino fetu geminum opus dilectionis agnoscitur, domini dei scilicet et proximi, in quibus duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet et prophetae.

### English translation (Claude)

As to what follows, “They were filled with pork,” I have already explained what I thought of this too. But the reading which other manuscripts have, and which are said to have it more truly, because the more careful copies resolve the same ambiguity of the Greek word by an accent mark, in the Greek manner of writing, is more obscure indeed, but seems to fit better with the preferable sense. For since he had said, “And with your hidden things their belly has been filled,” words by which the hidden judgments of God are signified (for they are hidden from the wretched, even those who rejoice in evils, whom God has given up to the lusts of their hearts), as if it were asked by what those could be recognized who have been filled in secret with the wrath of God, and the answer were what is said in the Gospel, “By their fruits you will know them,” there was added at once: “They were filled with sons,” that is, with fruits, which is more plainly called their works. Hence we read elsewhere: “Behold, he has travailed with injustice, conceived sorrow, and brought forth iniquity”; and elsewhere: “Then desire, when it has conceived, gives birth to sin.” Bad sons, then, are bad works, by which those are recognized who have been filled, as in the belly, with the hidden judgments of God on their inward thoughts; good works are good sons, as is said to the Church, the bride: “Your teeth are like a flock of shorn ewes coming up from the washing, all of which bear twins, and there is not a barren one among them.” In this twin offspring is recognized the twofold work of love, namely of the Lord God and of the neighbor, on which two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

### Scripture references

- Ps 17:14 (16:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:16: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 7:14 (7:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:15: quotation, high confidence
- Song 4:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Greek ὑείων (“of swine”) and υἱῶν (“of sons”) differ only by accent in some copies. Ps 17:14 (LXX 16:14); Rom 1:24; Matt 7:16; Ps 7:14 (LXX 7:15); Jas 1:15; Song 4:2; Matt 22:37–40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.4 (CSEL 44:351–352; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-4).

## Letter 149.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-5
- Source: CSEL 44:352–353
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine confirms from Greek manuscripts the genitive 'of sons' in Psalm 17:14 and links 'left their remains to their little ones' with Matthew 27:25.

### Latin text

Iste autem sensus, quo ita exponitur, quod scriptum est: Saturati sunt filiis, non mihi occurrerat, cum ante rescriberem; sed recensui breuissimam quandam eiusdem psalmi expositionem, quam iam olim dictaueram, et hoc satis breuiter a me positum repperi. inspexi etiam codices Graecos, utrum datiuus casus esset, quod dictum est filiis, an genetiuus, quo illa lingua utitur pro ablatiuo, et inueni genetiuum. quod si ad uerbum interpretaretur, scriptum esset: Saturati sunt filiorum; sed recte interpres sententiam secutus est et Latino more dixit: Saturati sunt filiis. quod uero sequitur: Et reliquerunt reliquias paruulis suis, existimo paruulos accipiendos manifestos carnis filios. unde etiam secundum istam non de porcina sed de filiis expositionem manet illa sententia, qua dixerunt: Sanguis huius super nos et super filios nostros; ita enim reliquerunt operum suorum reliquias paruulis suis.

### English translation (Claude)

This sense, by which “They were filled with sons” is explained in this way, had not occurred to me when I replied before; but I went over a very brief exposition of the same psalm which I had dictated long ago, and found it set down by me quite briefly. I also examined Greek manuscripts to see whether the word “sons” was in the dative case or the genitive, which that language uses for the ablative, and I found the genitive. If it were translated word for word, it would have been written, “They were filled of sons”; but the translator rightly followed the sense and said in the Latin manner, “They were filled with sons.” As for what follows, “And they left their remains to their little ones,” I think the little ones are to be understood as their manifest children of the flesh. Hence, on this exposition too, of “sons” rather than “pork,” that saying of theirs holds: “His blood be on us and on our children”; for thus they left the remains of their works to their little ones.

### Scripture references

- Ps 17:14 (16:14 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 27:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The brief exposition is Augustine's Exposition of Psalm 16. Ps 17:14 (LXX 16:14); Matt 27:25. The application to the Jews is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.5 (CSEL 44:352–353; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-5).

## Letter 149.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-6
- Source: CSEL 44:353
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: On Psalm 16:3 Augustine prefers 'in them' to 'among them' and takes God's 'wills' as the free gifts of grace, made wonderful in the saints.

### Latin text

In quinto decimo autem psalmo quod scriptum est: Mirificauit uel: Mirificet omnes uoluntates suas inter illos, nihil prohibet intellegi, immo et conuenientius uidetur non inter illos, sed in illis. sic enim et Graeci codices habent; saepe autem, quod habet illa lingua in illis, nostri interpretantur (inter illos,) ubi uidetur sententiae conuenire. accipiamus ergo: Sanctis, qui in terra sunt eius, mirificauit omnes uoluntates suas illis, quod plerique codices habent, et intellegamus uoluntates eius munera gratiae, quae gratis data est, id est quia uoluit, non quia debebatur. unde est: Scuto bonae uoluntatis coronasti nos et: In uoluntate tua deduxisti et: Voluntarie genuit nos uerbo ueritatis et: Pluuiam uoluntariam segregans, deus, hereditati tuae et: Diuidens propria unicuique, prout uult, et alia innumerabilia. proinde: Mirificauit omnes uoluntates suas in illis; in quibus nisi in sanctis, qui in terra sunt eius? si enim terra, sicut supra ostendimus, potest accipi in bono et ubi non additum est eius, quanto magis ubi dicitur terra eius! miras ergo fecit omnes uoluntates suas in illis, miras omnino fecit, quia eos ex desperatione mirabiliter liberauit.

### English translation (Claude)

In the fifteenth psalm, as to what is written, “He has made wonderful,” or “May he make wonderful all his wills among them,” nothing prevents its being understood, and indeed it seems more fitting, not “among them” but “in them.” For so the Greek manuscripts have it; and often, where that language has “in them,” our translators render “among them,” when it seems to suit the sense. Let us take it, then: “To the saints who are in his land he has made wonderful all his wills in them,” as most manuscripts have it; and let us understand his wills as the gifts of grace, which is given freely, that is, because he willed, not because it was owed. Hence: “With the shield of your good will you have crowned us,” and, “In your will you have led me,” and, “Of his own will he begot us by the word of truth,” and, “A voluntary rain, O God, setting apart for your inheritance,” and, “Dividing to each one his own, as he wills,” and countless others. Accordingly: “He has made wonderful all his wills in them.” In whom but in the saints who are in his land? For if the earth, as we showed above, can be taken in a good sense even where “his” is not added, how much more where it is said “his land”! He made all his wills wonderful in them, entirely wonderful, because he wonderfully freed them from despair.

### Scripture references

- Ps 16:3 (15:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 5:12 (5:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 73:24 (72:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 68:9 (67:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's fifteenth psalm is Ps 16; he discusses Ps 16:3 (LXX 15:3). Ps 5:12 (LXX 5:13); Ps 73:24 (LXX 72:24); Jas 1:18; Ps 68:9 (LXX 67:10); 1 Cor 12:11.
- Grace given freely: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.6 (CSEL 44:353; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-6).

## Letter 149.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-7
- Source: CSEL 44:353–355
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The 'multiplied weaknesses' of Psalm 16:4 are sins, as in Romans 5, multiplied under the law so that superabounding grace might heal and make sinners hasten to God.

### Latin text

Ex hac admiratione exclamat apostolus: O altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! supra quippe dixerat: Conclusit enim deus omnes in infidelitate, ut omnium misereatur. nam hoc etiam hic sequitur: Multiplicatae sunt infirmitates eorum; postea accelerauerunt. infirmitates posuit pro peccatis, sicut ad Romanos apostolus dicit: Si enim Christus, cum infirmi essemus adhuc, iuxta tempus pro impiis mortuus est; hos dixit infirmos, quos impios. deinde paulo post eandem sententiam repetens: Commendat, inquit, suam caritatem deus in nobis, quoniam, cum adhuc peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est; quos infirmos supra, eos hic peccatores appellauit. item in consequentibus hoc idem aliis uerbis uersans: Si enim, cum inimici essemus, inquit, reconciliati sumus deo per mortem filii eius. ac per hoc in eo, quod dictum est: Multiplicatae sunt infirmitates eorum, intelleguntur multiplicata peccata eorum. lex enim subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum; sed quoniam, ubi abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia, ideo postea accelerauerunt. non enim uenit ille uocare iustos sed peccatores, quia non est opus sanis medicus sed aegrotantibus, quorum scilicet multiplicatae sunt infirmitates, ut eis sanandis esset necessaria tantae gratiae medicina et, cui dimittuntur peccata multa, diligeret multum.

### English translation (Claude)

Out of this wonder the apostle cries out: “O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God!” For he had said above: “For God has shut up all in unbelief, that he may have mercy on all.” For this too follows here: “Their weaknesses were multiplied; afterward they made haste.” He put weaknesses for sins, as the apostle says to the Romans: “For if Christ, when we were still weak, died at the appointed time for the ungodly”; he called the same people weak whom he called ungodly. Then, a little later, repeating the same thought, he says: “God commends his love toward us, in that, while we were still sinners, Christ died for us”; those he called weak above he here called sinners. Again, turning the same thought in other words in what follows, he says: “For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son.” And so in the words “Their weaknesses were multiplied,” their multiplied sins are understood. For the law came in so that sin might abound; but since, where sin abounded, grace superabounded, therefore afterward they made haste. For he came not to call the righteous but sinners, since those who are well do not need a physician, but the sick, whose weaknesses, that is, were multiplied, so that for their healing the medicine of so great a grace was needed, and the one to whom many sins are forgiven might love much.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:32: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 7:47: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:33, 32; Ps 16:4 (LXX 15:4, “afterward they made haste”); Rom 5:6, 8, 10, 20; Matt 9:12–13; Luke 7:47.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.7 (CSEL 44:353–355; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-7).

## Letter 149.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-8
- Source: CSEL 44:355–356
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Old Testament sacrifices only signified cleansing; the sinners whose names God will not remember (Psalm 16:4) are those washed in Christ, who speaks in this psalm.

### Latin text

Hoc cinis uaccae et aspersio sanguinis et cruentarum multiplicatio uictimarum significabat, non efficiebat. ideo deinceps dicit: Non congregabo conuenticula eorum de sanguinibus, id est illorum sacrificiorum, quae immolabantur in figura sanguinis Christi, nec memor ero nominum illorum per labia mea. nomina quippe illorum erant in multiplicatione infirmitatum fornicatores, idolis seruientes, adulteri, molles, masculorum concubitores, fures, auari, raptores, ebriosi, maledici et quicumque alii regnum dei non possidebunt. sed ubi abundante peccato superabundauit gratia et postea accelerauerunt, haec quidem fuerunt, sed abluti sunt, sed sanctificati sunt, sed iustificati sunt in nomine domini nostri Iesu Christi et in spiritu dei nostri; ideo non memor erit nominum illorum per labia sua. sane codices emendatiores et electioris auctoritatis non habent uoluntates suas sed uoluntates meas quod tantundem ualet, quia ex persona filii dei dicitur. ipse quippe loquitur, quem uerba illa euidenter ostendunt, quibus et apostoli usi sunt: Non derelinques animam meam in inferno nec dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem. eadem sunt utique munera gratiae patris et filii et spiritus sancti et ideo rectissime et filius eas potest dicere uoluntates suas.

### English translation (Claude)

This was what the ashes of the heifer, the sprinkling of blood, and the multiplication of bloody victims signified, not effected. That is why he goes on to say: “I will not gather their assemblies from blood,” that is, of those sacrifices which were offered as a figure of the blood of Christ, “nor will I remember their names with my lips.” For their names, in the multiplication of weaknesses, were fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, effeminate, men who lie with men, thieves, the greedy, robbers, drunkards, revilers, and whoever else will not possess the kingdom of God. But where, as sin abounded, grace superabounded, and afterward they made haste, these things they were, but they were washed, they were sanctified, they were justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God; therefore he will not remember their names with his lips. Indeed, the more correct manuscripts, of preferable authority, have not “his wills” but “my wills,” which comes to the same, since it is said in the person of the Son of God. For it is he who speaks, as is clearly shown by those words which the apostles also used: “You will not leave my soul in hell, nor let your holy one see corruption.” The gifts of grace of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are certainly the same, and therefore the Son too can most rightly call them his wills.

### Scripture references

- Heb 9:13: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 16:10 (15:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:27: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 16:3 (15:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The ashes of a heifer: Heb 9:13 (Num 19); Ps 16:4 (LXX 15:4); 1 Cor 6:9–11 (the list is translated as written; “sexual” vices follow the Latin nouns); Rom 5:20; Ps 16:10 (LXX 15:10), quoted in Acts 2:27; 13:35.
- Trinitarian remark: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.8 (CSEL 44:355–356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-8).

## Letter 149.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-9
- Source: CSEL 44:356–357
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads Psalm 59:11 ('Do not kill them … scatter them') as foretelling the preservation and dispersion of the Jews, who keep the Scriptures as witnesses to the prophecies of Christ.

### Latin text

Quod uero in psalmo quinquagesimo octauo de Iudaeis intellegitur dicente: Ne occideris eos, ne quando obliuiscantur legis tuae, conuenienter mihi uidetur intellegi ita esse praenuntiatum: eandem gentem etiam debellatam atque subuersam in populi uictoris superstitiones non fuisse cessuram, sed in ueteri lege mansuram, ut apud eam esset testimonium scripturarum toto orbe terrarum, unde ecclesia fuerat euocanda. nullo enim euidentiore documento ostenditur gentibus, quod saluberrime aduertitur, non inopinatum et repentinum aliquid institutum spiritu praesumptionis humanae, ut Christi nomen in spe salutis aeternae tanta auctoritate praepolleat, sed olim fuisse prophetatum atque conscriptum. nam ipsa prophetia quid aliud nisi a nostris putaretur esse conficta, si non de inimicorum codicibus probaretur? ideo: Ne occideris eos, ne ipsius gentis nomen extinxeris, ne quando obliuiscantur legis tuae, quod utique fieret, si ritus et sacra gentium colere compulsi penitus qualecumque nomen suae religionis minime retinerent. quod in eorum figura etiam de Cain scriptum est, quod constituit eo dominus signum, ne quis occideret eum. denique cum dixisset: Ne occideris eos, ne quando obliuiscantur legis tuae, uelut quaereretur, quid de illis esset faciendum, ut in aliquos usus testimonii ueritatis non occidantur, id est non consumantur neque obliuiscantur legis dei, continuo subiunxit: Disperge illos in uirtute tua. si enim uno in loco essent terrarum, non adiuuarent testimonio praedicationem euangelii, quae fructificat toto orbe terrarum. ideo: Disperge illos in uirtute tua, ut eius ipsius, cuius fuerunt negatores, persecutores, interfectores, ubique sint testes per ipsam legem, quam non obliuiscuntur, in qua est ille prophetatus, quem non sequuntur. neque enim eis aliquid prodest, quod eam non obliuiscuntur; aliud est enim legem dei habere in memoria, aliud in intellectu et effectu.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what is understood of the Jews in the fifty-eighth psalm, which says, “Do not kill them, lest they ever forget your law,” it seems to me fittingly understood as foretelling this: that this same nation, even when conquered and overthrown, would not give way to the superstitions of the victorious people, but would remain in the old law, so that with it there should be the testimony of the Scriptures throughout the whole world, from which the Church was to be called out. For by no clearer evidence is it shown to the nations (and this is most wholesomely noticed) that it was not something unexpected and sudden, set up by a spirit of human presumption, that the name of Christ should prevail with such authority in the hope of eternal salvation, but that it had been prophesied and written down long ago. For what would the prophecy itself be thought but to have been invented by our people, if it were not proved from the books of our enemies? Therefore: “Do not kill them,” do not extinguish the very name of that nation, “lest they ever forget your law,” which would surely happen if, compelled to practice the rites and sacred things of the Gentiles, they kept nothing at all of the name of their religion, such as it is. This is what is written also of Cain, as a figure of them, that the Lord set a mark on him so that no one should kill him. Then, having said, “Do not kill them, lest they ever forget your law,” as if it were asked what was to be done with them, so that they should not be killed (that is, not be destroyed) for the sake of some use as witnesses to the truth, and should not forget the law of God, he added at once: “Scatter them by your power.” For if they were in one place on earth, they would not help by their testimony the preaching of the Gospel, which bears fruit in the whole world. Therefore, “Scatter them by your power,” so that they may be witnesses everywhere, through that very law which they do not forget, of him whose deniers, persecutors, and killers they were, the one prophesied in it whom they do not follow. For it profits them nothing that they do not forget it; for it is one thing to have the law of God in memory, another to have it in understanding and in deed.

### Scripture references

- Ps 59:11 (58:12 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gen 4:15: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's fifty-eighth psalm is Ps 59; Ps 59:11 (LXX 58:12). The mark of Cain: Gen 4:15. The Gospel bearing fruit in the whole world: Col 1:6.
- This passage expresses Augustine’s view of the Jews as witnesses; it is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.9 (CSEL 44:356–357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-9).

## Letter 149.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-10
- Source: CSEL 44:357–358
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains Psalm 68:21 as hyperbole for overweening pride, and the 'tongue of your dogs' (68:23) as converted enemies who now bark in God's defense.

### Latin text

In sexagesimo autem et septimo psalmo quod quaeris quid sit: Verum tamen deus conquassabit capita inimicorum suorum, uerticem capilli perambulantium in delictis suis, non mihi uidetur aliud dictum quam deus conquassabit capita inimicorum suorum nimium superbientium, nimium se extollentium in delictis suis. per hyperbolen quippe significauit superbiam tantum se extollentem et tanta elatione incedentem, quasi capilli uerticem perambulando calcarent. item in eodem psalmo quod scriptum est: Lingua canum tuorum ex inimicis ab ipso, non semper in malo accipiendi sunt canes. alioquin non reprehenderentur apud prophetam canes nescientes latrare et amantes dormitare; profecto enim laudabiles canes essent, si et latrare scirent et uigilare amarent. et certe illi trecenti in numero per crucis litteram sacratissimo non eligerentur ad uictoriam faciendam, qui tamquam canes lamberent aquam, nisi aliquid magnum significarent. uigilant enim et latrant boni canes et pro domo et pro domino et pro grege et pro pastore. denique et hic in ecclesiae laudibus, cum prophetia exereretur, lingua canum est commemorata, non dentes. tuorum autem canum, dixit, ex inimicis, id est ut, qui erant inimici tui, fierent canes tui et latrarent pro te, qui saeuiebant in te. addidit autem ab ipso, ut non a se ipsis hoc factum intellegerent sed ab ipso, id est misericordia eius et gratia.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your question what is meant in the sixty-seventh psalm by “But God will shatter the heads of his enemies, the crown of the hair of those who walk about in their sins,” it seems to me to mean nothing other than that God will shatter the heads of his enemies who are excessively proud, who exalt themselves excessively in their sins. For by hyperbole he signified a pride that exalts itself so much and walks with such haughtiness that it would, as it were, tread on the crown of its own hair as it walks. Again, as to what is written in the same psalm, “The tongue of your dogs from the enemies by him,” dogs are not always to be taken in a bad sense. Otherwise the prophet would not rebuke dogs that do not know how to bark and love to sleep; surely dogs would be praiseworthy if they knew how to bark and loved to keep watch. And certainly those three hundred, a number most sacred because of the letter of the cross, would not have been chosen to win the victory, those who lapped the water like dogs, unless they signified something great. For good dogs keep watch and bark for the house and for the master, for the flock and for the shepherd. Finally here too, in the praises of the Church, as the prophecy was being woven, the tongue of dogs was mentioned, not their teeth. And he said “of your dogs from the enemies,” that is, so that those who were your enemies might become your dogs and bark for you who raged against you. And he added “by him,” so that they would understand that this was done not by themselves but by him, that is, by his mercy and grace.

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:21 (67:22 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 68:23 (67:24 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 56:10: allusion, high confidence
- Judg 7:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's sixty-seventh psalm is Ps 68; Ps 68:21, 23 (LXX 67:22, 24). Dogs that cannot bark: Isa 56:10. Gideon's three hundred: Judg 7:5–7; the Greek letter tau (T, the shape of the cross) stands for 300.
- The staged exereretur is uncertain (perhaps texeretur, “was being woven”); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.10 (CSEL 44:357–358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-10).

## Letter 149.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-11
- Source: CSEL 44:358–359
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: On Ephesians 4:11 Augustine identifies the prophets as New Testament prophets like Agabus and takes 'pastors and teachers' as one office, since teaching belongs to pastors.

### Latin text

De prophetis quod ait apostolus: Quosdam quidem dedit deus in ecclesia apostolos, quosdam autem prophetas, hoc intellego, quod ipse scripsisti, prophetas eos dictos isto loco, ex quibus Agabus erat, non illos, qui uenturum in carne dominum prophetauerunt. euangelistas uero inuenimus, quos apostolos fuisse non legimus, sicut fuerunt Marcus et Lucas. pastores autem et doctores, quos maxime ut discernerem uoluisti, eosdem puto esse, sicut et tibi uisum est, ut non alios pastores, alios doctores intellegamus; sed ideo, cum praedixisset pastores, subiunxisse doctores, ut intellegerent pastores ad officium suum pertinere doctrinam. ideo enim non ait: Quosdam autem pastores, quosdam uero doctores, sed cum superiora ipso locutionis genere distingueret dicendo: Quosdam autem apostolos, quosdam autem prophetas, quosdam uero euangelistas, sed hoc tamquam unum aliquid duobus nominibus amplexus est: Quosdam autem pastores et doctores.

### English translation (Claude)

As to what the apostle says about prophets, “And God gave some in the Church as apostles, some as prophets,” I understand, as you yourself wrote, that those are called prophets in this place of whom Agabus was one, not those who prophesied the coming of the Lord in the flesh. And we find evangelists whom we do not read to have been apostles, such as Mark and Luke. As for pastors and teachers, whom you especially wanted me to distinguish, I think they are the same, as it seemed to you too, so that we do not understand pastors to be some and teachers others; but that, having first said pastors, he added teachers, so that they would understand that teaching belongs to the office of pastors. That is why he does not say, “some pastors, and some teachers,” but, while he distinguished the preceding ones by the very form of speech, saying, “some apostles, some prophets, some evangelists,” he embraced this one as a single thing under two names: “some pastors and teachers.”

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:11: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:28: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 11:28: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 21:10: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 4:11 (with 1 Cor 12:28); Agabus: Acts 11:28; 21:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.11 (CSEL 44:358–359; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-11).

## Letter 149.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-12
- Source: CSEL 44:359
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns to 1 Timothy 2:1, noting that the Greek uses different words (παρακαλῶ, δεήσεις) where some Latin copies repeat 'beseech.'

### Latin text

Illa plane difficillime discernuntur, ubi ad Timotheum scribens ait: Obsecro itaque primum omnium fieri obsecrationes, orationes, interpellationes, gratiarum actiones. secundum Graecum enim eloquium discernenda sunt; nam nostri interpretes uix reperiuntur, qui ea diligenter et scienter transferre curauerint. ecce enim sicut ea ipse posuisti: Obsecro fieri obsecrationes, non eodem uerbo utrumque dixit apostolus, qui utique Graece illam scripsit epistulam; sed pro eo, quod in Latino est (obsecro), ille Graece dixit παρακαλῶ); pro eo uero, quod Latinus uester habet (obsecrationes), ille posuit δεήσεις. proinde alii codices, in quibus et nostri sunt, non habent obsecrationes sed deprecationes). tria porro quae sequuntur: Orationes, interpellationes, gratiarum actiones plerique Latini codices sic habent

### English translation (Claude)

But those things are very hard to distinguish where, writing to Timothy, he says: “I urge, then, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made.” They must be distinguished according to the Greek language; for hardly any of our translators are found who have taken care to render them carefully and knowledgeably. For look: as you yourself gave it, “I beseech that beseechings be made,” the apostle, who certainly wrote that letter in Greek, did not say both with the same word; but for what is in Latin “I beseech” he said in Greek παρακαλῶ, while for what your Latin has as “beseechings” he put δεήσεις. Accordingly, other manuscripts, among them ours, have not “beseechings” but “supplications.” As for the three that follow, “prayers, intercessions, thanksgivings,” most Latin manuscripts have them so.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:1. The Greek words, garbled in the digital text, are restored by logged corrections.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.12 (CSEL 44:359; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-12).

## Letter 149.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-13
- Source: CSEL 44:359–360
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine discusses the Latin words for the kinds of prayer in 1 Timothy 2:1 and their Greek equivalents, rejecting 'adorations' as a rendering of προσευχάς.

### Latin text

Unde si uelimus secundum Latinae linguae proprietates ista discernere more loquendi, nostram uel qualemque scientiam fortasse tenebimus; sed mirum si sententiam Graeci sermonis uel consuetudinis obtinebimus. precationem et deprecationem multi nostri hoc idem putant et hoc cotidiano usu iam omnino praeualuit. qui autem distinctius Latine locuti sunt, precationibus utebantur in optandis bonis, deprecationibus uero in deuitandis malis. precari enim dicebant esse precando bona optare, inprecari mala, quod uulgo iam dicitur maledicere. deprecari autem mala precando depellere. sed usitatum iam loquendi modum potius sequamur et, siue (precationes) siue deprecationes inuenerimus, quas Graeci δεήσεις uocant, non putemus esse emendandum. orationes uero, quas Graecus habet προσευχὰς, distinguere a precibus uel precationibus omnino difficile est. quod uero quidam codices non habent orationes sed adorationes, quia non dictum est in Graeco εὐχὰς sed προσευχάς arbitror scienter interpretatum; προσευχάς enim orationes dici a Graecis notissimum est. et utique aliud est orare, aliud adorare. denique non isto uerbo sed alio legitur in Graeco: Dominum deum tuum adorabis et: Adorabo ad templum sanctum tuum et si qua similia.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence, if we wish to distinguish these words according to the properties of the Latin language, by its manner of speaking, we shall perhaps hold on to our own knowledge, such as it is; but it would be surprising if we grasped the sense of the Greek language or usage. Many of our people think precatio and deprecatio are the same, and this has now entirely prevailed in daily use. But those who spoke Latin more precisely used precationes for wishing for good things, deprecationes for averting evils. For they said precari meant to wish for good things by praying, imprecari to wish for evils, which is now commonly called cursing, and deprecari to drive away evils by praying. But let us rather follow the manner of speaking now in use, and whether we find precationes or deprecationes for what the Greeks call δεήσεις, let us not think it needs correcting. As for orationes, which the Greek has as προσευχάς, it is altogether difficult to distinguish them from preces or precationes. And as for some manuscripts having not orationes but adorationes, because the Greek does not say εὐχάς but προσευχάς, I think it was not translated knowledgeably; for it is very well known that the Greeks call orationes προσευχάς. And certainly it is one thing to pray, another to adore. Indeed, in the Greek, “You shall adore the Lord your God,” and “I will adore toward your holy temple,” and any similar passages, are read not with this word but with another.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:1: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 4:10: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 5:7 (5:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Latin terms are left in Latin where Augustine distinguishes them. “You shall adore the Lord your God”: Matt 4:10 (Deut 6:13); “I will adore toward your holy temple”: Ps 5:7 (LXX 5:8; cf. Ps 138:2). The staged text has the unclear phrase “arbitror scienter interpretatum”; the argument requires “not knowledgeably,” and it is so translated.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.13 (CSEL 44:359–360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-13).

## Letter 149.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-14
- Source: CSEL 44:360–361
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that 'intercessions' and 'requests' both render the Greek ἐντεύξεις, the same word used of Christ interceding for us.

### Latin text

Pro interpellationibus autem, quod nostri habent, secundum codices, credo, uestros postulationes posuisti. haec interim duo, id est quod alii postulationes, alii interpellationes interpretati sunt, unum uerbum transferre uoluerunt, quod Graecus habet, ἐντεύξεις. et profecto aduertis et nosti aliud esse interpellare, aliud postulare. non enim solemus dicere postulant interpellaturi sed interpellant postulaturi; uerum tamen ex uicinitate uerbum usurpatum, cui propinquitas ipsa impetrat intellectum, non est uelut censoria notatione culpandum. nam et de ipso domino Iesu Christo dictum est, quod interpellet pro nobis. numquidnam interpellat et non etiam postulat? immo uero, quia postulat, pro eo positum est interpellat. euidenter quippe alibi de illo dicitur: Et si quis peccauerit, aduocatum habemus ad patrem Iesum Christum iustum; ipse est exoratio pro peccatis nostris. quamquam fortassis codices apud uos etiam in eo loco de domino Iesu non habent interpellat pro nobis sed postulat pro nobis; in Graeco enim, quo uerbo hic positae sunt interpellationes, quas ipse posuisti postulationes, ipsum et illic uerbum est, ubi scriptum est: Interpellat pro nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

For interpellationes (intercessions), which our copies have, you put postulationes (requests), following, I believe, your manuscripts. These two, then, that is, what some have rendered postulationes and others interpellationes, are attempts to translate one word, which the Greek has as ἐντεύξεις. And of course you notice and know that it is one thing to intercede and another to request. For we do not usually say “they request in order to intercede” but “they intercede in order to request”; yet a word borrowed from a neighboring meaning, to which that very nearness secures understanding, is not to be faulted as if with a censor’s mark. For it is said even of the Lord Jesus Christ himself that he intercedes for us. Does he intercede and not also request? On the contrary, because he requests, “intercedes” has been put for it. For it is plainly said of him elsewhere: “And if anyone sins, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; he is the propitiation for our sins.” Although perhaps your manuscripts, in that place about the Lord Jesus too, have not “intercedes for us” but “requests for us”; for in the Greek the word used here for interpellationes, which you gave as postulationes, is the same word used there, where it is written: “He intercedes for us.”

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:34: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:34; 1 John 2:1–2. The Latin terms are kept where Augustine compares them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.14 (CSEL 44:360–361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-14).

## Letter 149.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-15
- Source: CSEL 44:361–362
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Though the words for prayer overlap in common use, Paul's listing suggests each has its own proper sense, which is hard to determine.

### Latin text

Cum igitur, et qui precatur et qui orat, precetur et, qui interpellat deum, ad hoc interpellet, ut oret et precetur, quid sibi uult, quod ista ita posuit apostolus, ut non sit eorum neglegenda distinctio? excepto itaque nomine generali et salua loquendi consuetudine, secundum quam, siue dicas precationem siue orationem siue interpellationem uel postulationem, una eademque res intellegitur, aliqua etiam singulorum istorum proprietas inquirenda est, sed ad eam liquido peruenire difficile est; multa quippe hinc dici possunt, quae inprobanda non sint.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, he who supplicates and he who prays both supplicate, and he who intercedes with God intercedes in order to pray and supplicate, what does it mean that the apostle set these down in such a way that their distinction should not be neglected? Leaving aside the general meaning, and keeping the usage of speech according to which, whether you say supplication or prayer or intercession or request, one and the same thing is understood, some property of each of these must also be sought; but it is difficult to arrive at it clearly, for many things can be said about it that are not to be rejected.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:1: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.15 (CSEL 44:361–362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-15).

## Letter 149.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-16
- Source: CSEL 44:362–363
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine maps the four kinds of prayer in 1 Timothy 2:1 onto the eucharistic liturgy: supplications before the consecration, prayers at the consecration and breaking, intercessions at the blessing of the people, thanksgiving after communion.

### Latin text

Sed eligo in his uerbis hoc intellegere, quod omnis uel paene omnis frequentat ecclesia, ut precationes accipiamus dictas, quas facimus in celebratione sacramentorum, antequam illud, quod est in domini mensa, incipiat benedici, orationes, cum benedicitur et sanctificatur et ad distribuendum comminuitur, quam totam petitionem fere omnis ecclesia dominica oratione concludit. ad quem intellectum etiam uerbi Graeci origo nos adiuuat; nam eam quam dicunt εὐχήν raro ita scriptura ponit, ut intellegatur oratio; sed plerumque et multo usitatius uotum appellatur εὐχή, προσευχὴν uero, quod uerbum ita positum est, unde tractamus, semper orationem uocat. unde hanc uerbi originem, sicut superius dixi, nonnulli minus erudite intuentes προσευχὴν non orationem sed adorationem dicere uoluerunt, quae potius προσκύνησις dicitur; sed quia oratio interdum uocatur εὐχή, adoratio putata est προσευχή. porro si usitatius, ut dixi, in scripturis uotum appellatur εὐχή, excepto nomine generali orationis ea proprie intellegenda est oratio, quam facimus ad uotum, id est πρὸς εὐχήν. uouentur autem omnia, quae offeruntur deo, maxime sancti altaris oblatio, quo sacramento praedicatur nostrum illud maximum uotum, quo nos uouimus in Christo esse mansuros, utique in compage corporis Christi. cuius rei sacramentum est, quod unus panis, unum corpus multi sumus. ideo in huius sanctificatione et distributionis praeparatione existimo apostolum iussisse proprie fieri προσευχάς, id est orationes uel, ut nonnulli minus perite interpretati sunt, adorationes, hoc est enim ad uotum, quod usitatius in scripturis nuncupatur εὐχή. interpellationes autem siue, ut uestri codices habent, postulationes fiunt, cum populus benedicitur; tunc enim antistites uelut aduocati susceptos suos per manus inpositionem misericordissimae offerunt potestati. quibus peractis et participato tanto sacramento gratiarum actio cuncta concludit, quam in his etiam uerbis ultimam commendauit apostolus.

### English translation (Claude)

But I choose to understand in these words what the whole or almost the whole Church practices: that we take as supplications those we make in the celebration of the sacraments before what is on the Lord’s table begins to be blessed; as prayers, those made when it is blessed and sanctified and broken for distribution, the whole of which petition almost the whole Church concludes with the Lord’s Prayer. The origin of the Greek word also helps us to this understanding. For what they call εὐχή Scripture rarely uses so that prayer is understood; but mostly, and much more commonly, a vow is called εὐχή, while προσευχή, the word used in the passage we are treating, always means prayer. Hence some, looking at the origin of this word with too little learning, wanted προσευχή to mean not prayer but adoration, which is rather called προσκύνησις; but because prayer is sometimes called εὐχή, προσευχή was thought to be adoration. Further, if, as I said, a vow is more commonly called εὐχή in the Scriptures, then, leaving aside the general meaning of prayer, that prayer is properly to be understood which we make toward a vow, that is, πρὸς εὐχήν. Now all things that are offered to God are vowed, above all the oblation of the holy altar, by which sacrament is proclaimed that greatest vow of ours by which we have vowed to remain in Christ, namely in the framework of the body of Christ. The sacrament of this is that we, though many, are one bread, one body. Therefore I think the apostle commanded that προσευχαί, that is, prayers (or, as some have less skillfully translated, adorations), be made properly at its sanctification and the preparation for its distribution, for this means “toward a vow,” which in the Scriptures is more commonly called εὐχή. Intercessions, or, as your manuscripts have, requests, are made when the people are blessed; for then the bishops, as advocates, offer those in their care to the most merciful power by the laying on of hands. When these are completed and so great a sacrament has been received, thanksgiving concludes all, which the apostle also commended last in these words.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:1: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- One bread, one body: 1 Cor 10:17. The Greek words, garbled in the digital text, are restored by logged corrections; the staged text also writes ϰ for χ in εὐχή, corrected where the context is unique.
- Eucharistic passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.16 (CSEL 44:362–363; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-16).

## Letter 149.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-17
- Source: CSEL 44:363–364
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prayer must be offered for all, including persecuting rulers, because God wills all to be saved, but only through the one mediator, the man Christ Jesus, and sharing in his body and blood.

### Latin text

Haec autem causa praecipua fuit ista dicendi, ut his breuiter perstrictis atque significatis non putaretur neglegendum esse, quod sequitur: Pro omnibus hominibus, pro regibus et his, qui in sublimitate sunt, ut quietam et tranquillam uitam agamus in omni pietate et caritate, ne quisquam, sicut se habet humanae cogitationis infirmitas, existimaret non esse ista facienda pro his, a quibus persecutionem patiebatur ecclesia, cum membra Christi ex omni essent hominum genere colligenda. unde adiungit et dicit: Hoc enim bonum est et acceptum coram saluatore deo nostro, qui omnes homines uult saluos fieri et in agnitionem ueritatis uenire. et ne quisquam diceret posse esse salutis uiam in bona conuersatione et unius dei omnipotentis cultu sine participatione corporis et sanguinis Christi, unus enim deus, inquit, et unus mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus, ut illud, quod dixerat omnes homines uult saluos fieri, nullo alio modo intellegatur praestari nisi per mediatorem non deum, quod semper erat uerbum, sed hominem Christum Iesum, cum uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

But the chief reason for saying these things was that, having touched on and indicated them briefly, what follows should not be thought negligible: “for all men, for kings and for those in high positions, that we may lead a quiet and peaceful life in all godliness and love,” so that no one, as the weakness of human thinking is, should think these things were not to be done for those by whom the Church was suffering persecution, when the members of Christ were to be gathered from every kind of men. Hence he adds and says: “For this is good and acceptable before God our Savior, who wills all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” And so that no one should say that there could be a way of salvation in good conduct and the worship of the one almighty God without sharing in the body and blood of Christ, he says: “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”; so that what he had said, “he wills all men to be saved,” should be understood to be accomplished in no other way than through the mediator, not as God, which he always was, the Word, but as the man Christ Jesus, when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:1–5 (Augustine's text reads “love,” caritate, where others read “chastity” or “dignity”); John 1:14.
- Christological and sacramental passage: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.17 (CSEL 44:363–364; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-17).

## Letter 149.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-18
- Source: CSEL 44:364–365
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's inscrutable wisdom lets the wicked, whom he foreknew but did not make wicked, be born, and uses their evil for the good of the righteous.

### Latin text

Unde nec illud te moueat, quod de Iudaeis idem apostolus dicit: Secundum euangelium quidem inimici propter uos, secundum electionem autem dilecti propter patres. altitudo quippe illa diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei et illa inscrutabilia iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius hanc fidelibus cordibus magnam ingerunt admirationem, qui de illius sapientia pertendente a fine usque in finem fortiter et omnia suauiter disponente non dubitant, quid sit, quod ei placet, ut nascantur, crescant ac multiplicentur hi, quos etsi malos ipse non fecit, tamen malos futuros esse praesciuit. nimis enim consilium eius in abdito est, quo etiam malis bene utitur ad prouectum bonorum etiam in hoc mirificans omnipotentiam bonitatis suae, quia, sicut illorum nequitiae est male uti bonis operibus eius, sic illius sapientiae est bene uti malis operibus eorum.

### English translation (Claude)

So do not be troubled either by what the same apostle says of the Jews: “As regards the Gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.” For that depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God, and his unsearchable judgments and inscrutable ways, bring great wonder to faithful hearts; and these do not doubt, concerning his wisdom, which reaches mightily from end to end and orders all things sweetly, what it means that it pleases him that those should be born, grow, and multiply whom, though he did not make them wicked, he foreknew would be wicked. For his counsel is very deeply hidden, by which he uses even the wicked well for the advancement of the good, making wonderful in this too the omnipotence of his goodness; because, as it belongs to their wickedness to use his good works badly, so it belongs to his wisdom to use their bad works well.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:28, 33; Wis 8:1. The reference to the Jews follows Paul and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.18 (CSEL 44:364–365; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-18).

## Letter 149.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-19
- Source: CSEL 44:365
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: On Romans 11:25–27 Augustine takes the 'all Israel' that will be saved as the elect from Jews and Gentiles, the true Israel of God.

### Latin text

Hanc igitur altitudinem sacramenti sic commendat apostolus: Nolo uos ignorare, fratres, sacramentum hoc, ut non sitis uobis sapientes, quia caecitas ex parte in Israhel facta est, donec plenitudo gentium intraret et sic omnis Israhel saluus fieret. ex parte dixit, quia non omnes excaecati sunt; erant enim ex illis, qui Christum cognouerunt. plenitudo autem gentium in his intrat, qui secundum propositum uocati sunt. et sic omnis Israhel saluus fiet, quia et ex Iudaeis et ex gentibus, qui secundum propositum uocati sunt, ipsi uerius sunt Israhel, de quo dicit idem apostolus: Et super Israhel dei; illos autem dicit Israhel secundum carnem: Videte, inquit, Israhel secundum carnem. deinde interponit testimonium prophetae: Veniet ex Sion, qui eripiat et auertat impietatem ab Iacob; et hoc illis a me testamentum, cum abstulero peccata illorum non utique omnium Iudaeorum sed electorum.

### English translation (Claude)

This depth of the mystery, then, the apostle commends thus: “I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers, of this mystery, so that you may not be wise in your own eyes: that blindness has come in part upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles should come in, and so all Israel would be saved.” He said “in part” because not all were blinded; for there were some of them who recognized Christ. And the fullness of the Gentiles comes in in those who are called according to his purpose. And so all Israel will be saved, because those who are called according to his purpose, both from the Jews and from the Gentiles, are more truly Israel, of which the same apostle says, “And upon the Israel of God”; while the others he calls Israel according to the flesh: “Consider,” he says, “Israel according to the flesh.” Then he inserts the testimony of the prophet: “He will come from Zion who will deliver and turn away ungodliness from Jacob; and this will be my covenant with them, when I take away their sins”; not, of course, of all the Jews, but of the elect.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:26: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:27: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 59:20: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:25–27 (Isa 59:20–21; 27:9); called according to his purpose: Rom 8:28; Gal 6:16; 1 Cor 10:18. Election and the Jews: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.19 (CSEL 44:365; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-19).

## Letter 149.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-20
- Source: CSEL 44:365–367
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The 'enemies' and 'beloved' of Romans 11:28 are different members of one people, or enemies later converted; the elect were chosen before the foundation of the world.

### Latin text

Hinc adiungit ea, quae inquirenda posuisti: Secundum euangelium quidem inimici propter uos. pretium quippe redemptionis nostrae sanguis est Christi, qui utique non nisi ab inimicis potuit occidi. hic est ille usus malorum in prouectum bonorum. quod uero adiungit: Secundum electionem autem dilecti propter patres, hinc ostendit non illos inimicos sed electos esse dilectos. sed scripturae mos est ita loqui de parte tamquam de toto, sicut Corinthios in primis epistulae suae partibus ita laudat, tamquam omnes tales sint, cum essent laudabiles quidam eorum, et postea in nonnullis epistulae ipsius locis ita reprehendit, tamquam omnes culpabiles essent, propter quosdam, qui tales erant. istam diuinarum scripturarum consuetudinem per omne corpus litterarum eius creberrime sparsam quisquis diligenter aduerterit, multa dissoluit, quae inter se uidentur esse contraria. inimicos ergo alios dicit, alios dilectos; sed quia in uno populo erant, uelut eosdem ipsos dicere uidetur. quamquam et ex ipsis inimicis, qui crucifixerunt dominum, plerique conuersi sunt et apparuerunt electi, tunc electi, quando conuersi, quantum ad salutis initium, quantum uero ad dei praescientiam, non tunc electi sed ante constitutionem mundi, sicut idem dicit apostolus, quod elegerit nos ante mundi constitutionem. duobus itaque modis ipsi inimici, qui dilecti, siue quia in uno populo utrique fuerant siue quia ex inimicis saeuientibus usque ad sanguinem Christi quidam eorum dilecti facti erant secundum electionem, quae latebat in praescientia dei. ad hoc enim addidit propter patres, quia id, quod patribus promissum est, oportebat impleri, sicut circa finem epistulae ad Romanos ait: Dico enim Christum ministrum fuisse circumcisionis propter ueritatem dei ad confirmandas promissiones patrum, gentes autem super misericordia glorificare deum. secundum istam misericordiam dictum est: Inimici propter uos, quod et supra dixerat: Illorum delicto salus gentibus.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he adds the words you asked about: “As regards the Gospel they are enemies for your sake.” For the price of our redemption is the blood of Christ, who certainly could only be killed by enemies. Here is that use of the wicked for the advancement of the good. And when he adds, “but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers,” he shows by this that it is not those enemies but the elect who are beloved. But it is the custom of Scripture to speak of a part as of the whole; as he praises the Corinthians in the first parts of his letter as if all were such, when some of them were praiseworthy, and afterward in several places of the same letter rebukes them as if all were blameworthy, because of some who were such. Whoever carefully notices this custom of the divine Scriptures, scattered very frequently through the whole body of its writings, resolves many things that seem contradictory. He calls some, then, enemies and others beloved; but because they were in one people, he seems to speak of the same persons. And yet even of those enemies who crucified the Lord many were converted and showed themselves elect: elect then, when they were converted, as regards the beginning of salvation; but as regards God’s foreknowledge, elect not then but before the foundation of the world, as the same apostle says, that he chose us before the foundation of the world. In two ways, then, the enemies themselves are the beloved: either because both were in one people, or because, of the enemies who raged even to shedding the blood of Christ, some had become beloved according to the election that lay hidden in God’s foreknowledge. For this reason he added “for the sake of the fathers,” because what was promised to the fathers had to be fulfilled, as he says near the end of the letter to the Romans: “For I say that Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises to the fathers, and that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy.” In accordance with this mercy it was said, “enemies for your sake,” as he had also said above: “Through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles.”

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:28: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 1:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 15:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 15:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:28; 1 Corinthians (praise in 1:4–7, rebuke later); Eph 1:4; Rom 15:8–9; Rom 11:11. Election and the Jews: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.20 (CSEL 44:365–367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-20).

## Letter 149.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-21
- Source: CSEL 44:367
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The irrevocable gifts and calling of Romans 11:29 belong to the predestined, called according to God's purpose, foreknown, justified, and glorified (Romans 8).

### Latin text

Cum autem dixisset: Secundum electionem propter patres, addidit: Sine paenitentia enim sunt dona et uocatio dei. uides certe illos significari, qui pertinent ad numerum praedestinatorum. de quibus alio loco dicit: Scimus, quia diligentibus deum omnia cooperantur in bonum his, qui secundum propositum uocati sunt. multi enim sunt uocati, pauci uero electi; qui uero electi, ipsi sunt secundum propositum uocati, in quibus procul dubio dei praescientia falli non potest. hos praesciuit et praedestinauit conformes imaginis filii sui, ut sit ipse primogenitus in multis fratribus; quos autem praedestinauit, illos et uocauit. haec uocatio est secundum propositum; haec est sine paenitentia. quos autem uocauit, illos et iustificauit; quos autem iustificauit, illos et glorificauit. si deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

### English translation (Claude)

And when he had said, “As regards election, for the sake of the fathers,” he added: “For the gifts and the calling of God are without repentance.” You see that those are meant who belong to the number of the predestined, of whom he says in another place: “We know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.” For many are called, but few are chosen; and those who are chosen are the ones called according to his purpose, in whom God’s foreknowledge certainly cannot be mistaken. These he foreknew and predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, so that he might be the firstborn among many brothers; and those whom he predestined he also called. This calling is according to his purpose; this is without repentance. “And those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified. If God is for us, who is against us?”

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:29: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:30: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:29; Rom 8:28–31; Matt 22:14. Predestination: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.21 (CSEL 44:367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-21).

## Letter 149.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-22
- Source: CSEL 44:367–368
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who fall away were not among the predestined, as shown by baptized infants who later apostatize; why some are predestined and others not is hidden but never unjust.

### Latin text

Non sunt in ista uocatione, qui in fide, quae per dilectionem operatur, etiamsi aliquantum ambulant, non perseuerant usque in finem. et utique potuerunt rapi, ne malitia mutaret intellectum eorum, si ad illam praedestinationem et uocationem, quae secundum propositum et sine paenitentia est, pertinerent. ac ne quisquam praesumptor ita de occultis iudicet alienis, ut dicat: Ideo non rapti sunt ex hac uita, antequam essent fidei desertores, quia in eadem uita non fideliter ambulabant et hoc in eorum cordibus nouerat dominus, quamuis hominibus aliter appareret, quid dicturus est de infantulis paruulis, qui plerique accepto in illa aetate Christianae gratiae sacramento, cum sine dubio pertinerent ad uitam aeternam regnumque caelorum, si continuo ex hac uita migrarent, sinuntur crescere et nonnulli etiam apostatae fiunt? unde, nisi quia non pertinent ad illam praedestinationem et secundum propositum ac sine paenitentia uocationem? cur autem ad eam alii pertineant, alii non pertineant, occulta causa esse potest, iniusta non potest. numquid enim iniquitas apud deum? absit. nam et hoc ad illam pertinet altitudinem iudiciorum, quam mirans tamquam expauit apostolus; ideo quippe illa iudicia uocat, ne quisquam talia fieri putet siue iniquitate siue temeritate facientis siue casu et fortuito labentibus ullis partibus tam dispositorum sub tanta dei sapientia saeculorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Those are not in this calling who, though they walk for some time in the faith that works through love, do not persevere to the end. And certainly they could have been snatched away, lest wickedness should change their understanding, if they belonged to that predestination and calling which is according to his purpose and without repentance. And lest some presumptuous person judge others’ hidden things by saying, “They were not snatched from this life before they deserted the faith because they were not walking faithfully in that same life, and the Lord knew this in their hearts, although it appeared otherwise to men,” what will he say about little infants, many of whom, having received in that age the sacrament of Christian grace, would certainly belong to eternal life and the kingdom of heaven if they departed this life at once, yet are allowed to grow up, and some even become apostates? Why, except that they do not belong to that predestination and calling according to his purpose and without repentance? But why some belong to it and others do not, the cause may be hidden; it cannot be unjust. For is there injustice with God? By no means. For this too belongs to that depth of judgments at which the apostle, wondering, was as it were struck with awe. He calls them judgments for this very reason, so that no one should think such things happen either by injustice or rashness on the part of the one who does them, or by chance, as if any parts of the ages so ordered under the great wisdom of God slipped by fortuitously.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 10:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Faith working through love: Gal 5:6; perseverance to the end: Matt 10:22; “snatched away lest wickedness change his understanding”: Wis 4:11; Rom 9:14; Rom 11:33.
- Predestination and perseverance: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.22 (CSEL 44:367–368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-22).

## Letter 149.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-23
- Source: CSEL 44:368–369
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads 'Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle' (Colossians 2:21) as Paul's ironic quotation of false teachers, not his own command.

### Latin text

In epistula porro ad Colossenses quod scriptum est: Nemo uos seducat uolens in humilitate et cetera, quae sequuntur, quousque tibi obscura esse dixisti, nec ego adhuc sine caligine intellego. atque utinam praesens de me ista quaesisses! in eo quippe sensu, quem mihi in his uerbis habere uideor, adhibenda est quaedam pronuntiatio in uultu et modo uocis, qui exprimi litteris non potest, ut ex aliqua parte aperiatur, quod ideo fit obscurius, quia non recte, sicut existimo, pronuntiatur. quod enim scriptum est: Ne tetigeritis, ne gustaueritis, ne adtaminaueritis, tamquam praeceptum putatur apostoli nescio quid tangere, gustare, adtaminare prohibentis. contra est autem, si tamen in tanta ista obscuritate non fallor. per inrisionem quippe uerba posuit eorum, a quibus eos nolebat decipi atque seduci, qui discernentes cibos secundum culturam angelorum atque ita de hoc mundo decernentes dicunt: Ne tetigeris, ne gustaueris, ne adtaminaueris, cum sint omnia munda mundis et omnis creatura dei bona sit, quod alio loco euidenter ipse commendat.

### English translation (Claude)

As to what is written in the letter to the Colossians, “Let no one lead you astray, wishing to do so in humility,” and the rest that follows, as far as the point where you said it was obscure to you, I too do not yet understand it without some darkness. And would that you had asked me these things in person! For in the sense which I seem to myself to find in these words, a certain delivery in the expression of the face and the tone of the voice is needed, which cannot be expressed in writing, so that it might be opened up in some degree; it is more obscure precisely because, as I think, it is not delivered rightly. For what is written, “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” is thought to be a precept of the apostle forbidding one to touch, taste, or handle something or other. But it is the opposite, if I am not mistaken in so great an obscurity. For he set down mockingly the words of those by whom he did not want them to be deceived and led astray, who distinguish foods according to the worship of angels and, thus making decrees about this world, say: “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” although all things are clean to the clean and every creature of God is good, as he plainly affirms in another place.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:20: allusion, high confidence
- Titus 1:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:18, 20–21; Titus 1:15; 1 Tim 4:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.23 (CSEL 44:368–369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-2/#p-149-23).

## Letter 149.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-24
- Source: CSEL 44:369–370
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In context, Paul warns the Colossians against false 'wisdom' from pagan philosophy and Jewish observances, pointing them to Christ, in whom all treasures of wisdom are hidden.

### Latin text

Totam ergo ipsius sententiae circumstantiam uideamus; ita enim apostoli intentione perspecta sensum eius, quantum ualemus, fortasse tenebimus. quibus enim ista scribit, metuebat eos seduci umbris rerum, dulci nomine scientiae, et auerti a luce ueritatis, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. hanc autem sub nomine sapientiae uel scientiae curam uanarum superfluarumue obseruationum et de superstitione gentilitatis maximeque ab eis, qui philosophi nuncupati sunt, et a Iudaismo cauendam esse cernebat, ubi erant umbrae futurorum remouendae, quoniam lumen earum iam Christus aduenerat. cum ergo commemorasset et commendasset, quantum certamen pro eis haberet et pro his, qui Laodiciae fuerant et quicumque non uiderant faciem eius in carne, ut cordibus consolarentur copulati in caritate et in omnibus diuitiis plenitudinis intellectus ad cognoscendum mysterium dei, quod est Christus, in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiae et scientiae absconditi, hoc dico, inquit, ut nemo uos circumueniat in uerisimili sermone. quia ueritatis amore ducebantur, ueri similitudinem illis timuit, ne deciperentur. et ideo commendauit in Christo, quod dulcissimum habebant, thesaurum scilicet sapientiae et scientiae, cuius nomine et promissione induci poterant in errorem.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us look, then, at the whole context of this statement; for so, having seen the apostle’s intention, we may perhaps grasp his meaning as far as we can. He feared that those to whom he writes these things would be led astray by the shadows of things, under the sweet name of knowledge, and turned away from the light of truth, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. And he saw that this concern with empty and superfluous observances, under the name of wisdom or knowledge, was to be guarded against, both from the superstition of the Gentiles, and especially from those who were called philosophers, and from Judaism, where the shadows of things to come were to be removed, since their light, Christ, had now come. When, then, he had mentioned and commended how great a struggle he had for them and for those at Laodicea and for all who had not seen his face in the flesh, that their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love and in all the riches of the fullness of understanding, to know the mystery of God, which is Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, he says: “I say this so that no one may deceive you with plausible speech.” Because they were led by love of the truth, he feared lest they be deceived by a likeness of truth. And therefore he commended in Christ what they held most sweet, namely the treasure of wisdom and knowledge, by whose name and promise they could be led into error.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:1: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:1–4; shadows of things to come: Col 2:17. The reference to Judaism is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.24 (CSEL 44:369–370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-24).

## Letter 149.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-25
- Source: CSEL 44:370–372
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine traces Colossians 2:5–10: Paul warns against philosophy and the 'elements of the world,' since Christ, in whom the Godhead dwells bodily, is head of every principality and power.

### Latin text

Nam etsi corpore, inquit, absens sum, spiritu uobiscum sum gaudens et uidens uestram ordinationem et id, quod deest fidei uestrae in Christo. ideo illis timebat, quoniam, quid eis adhuc deesset, uidebat. sicut ergo accepistis, inquit, Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, in ipso ambulate radicati et superaedificati in ipso et confirmati in fide, sicut et didicistis, abundantes in ea gratiarum actione. uult eos fide nutriri, ut capaces fiant participandorum thesaurorum sapientiae et scientiae, qui sunt absconditi in Christo, ne ante, quam sint ad haec idonei, uerisimili sermone capiantur et a ueritatis itinere deuient. deinde apertius, quid eis timeat, ostendens: Videte, inquit, ne quis uos decipiat per philosophiam et inanem seductionem secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi et non secundum Christum, quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo diuinitatis corporaliter. ideo corporaliter dixit, quia illi umbraliter seducebant, translato uerbo usus, sicut etiam umbrae nomen in his rebus non est utique uerbum proprium sed quadam similitudinis ratione translatum. et estis, inquit, in illo repleti, qui est caput omnis principatus et potestatis. per principatus enim et potestates superstitio gentilium uel philosophi seducebant praedicantes illam, quam uocant, theologiam per elementa huius mundi. caput autem omnium Christum principium omnium uoluit intellegi, sicut ipse, cum ei dictum esset: Tu quis es? respondit: Principium. quod et loquor uobis. omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil. mirabiliter autem uult eos esse horum uelut mirabilium contemptores, cum eos ostendit corpus factos illius capitis dicendo: Et estis in illo repleti, qui est caput omnis principatus et potestatis.

### English translation (Claude)

“For though I am absent in body,” he says, “I am with you in spirit, rejoicing and seeing your order and what is lacking in your faith in Christ.” He feared for them, then, because he saw what was still lacking in them. “As, therefore, you have received Jesus Christ our Lord,” he says, “walk in him, rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, as you were taught, abounding in it with thanksgiving.” He wants them to be nourished by faith, so that they may become able to share in the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden in Christ, lest, before they are fit for these, they be captured by plausible speech and stray from the way of truth. Then, showing more openly what he fears for them, he says: “See that no one deceives you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ; for in him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.” He said “bodily” because they were leading astray “shadowily,” using a transferred word, just as the word “shadow” in these matters is certainly not a proper word but transferred by some reason of likeness. “And you are filled in him,” he says, “who is the head of every principality and power.” For by principalities and powers the superstition of the Gentiles, or the philosophers, were leading people astray, preaching what they call theology through the elements of this world. But by the head of all he meant Christ to be understood as the beginning of all, as he himself, when he was asked, “Who are you?” answered: “The Beginning, who also speak to you.” For all things were made through him, and without him nothing was made. And wonderfully he wants them to despise these supposedly wonderful things, when he shows that they have become the body of that head, saying: “And you are filled in him, who is the head of every principality and power.”

### Scripture references

- Col 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:3: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:5–10; John 8:25 (Latin: “the Beginning, who also speak to you”); John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.25 (CSEL 44:370–372; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-25).

## Letter 149.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-26
- Source: CSEL 44:372–373
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Colossians 2:11–15 warns against the 'shadows' of Judaism: in baptism believers share Christ's circumcision and resurrection, and Christ triumphed over the evil powers.

### Latin text

Hinc iam, ne umbris Iudaismi seducantur, adiungit: In quo etiam circumcisi estis circumcisione non manu facta in expoliatione corporis carnis — uel, sicut aliqui habent, in expoliatione corporis peccatorum carnis —, in circumcisione Christi consepulti ei in baptismum, in quo et consurrexistis per fidem operationis dei, qui suscitauit illum a mortuis. uide, quem ad modum et hic corpus Christi eos ostendit, ut ista contemnant, cohaerentes tanto capiti suo, mediatori dei et hominum Christo Iesu, et nullum falsum uel inualidum medium, per quod deo cohaereant, requirentes. et uos, inquit, cum essetis mortui in delictis et praeputio carnis uestrae — praeputium uocauit, quod significatur praeputio, hoc est delicta carnalia, quibus expoliandi sumus —, uiuificauit, inquit, cum illo donans uobis omnia delicta, delens, quod aduersus nos erat, chirographum in decretis, quod erat contrarium nobis — quia reos lex faciebat, quae subintrauerat, ut abundaret delictum —, tollens, inquit, illud de medio et affigens illud cruci, exuens se carne principatus et potestates exemplauit fiducialiter triumphans eos in semet ipso. non utique bonos sed malos principatus et malas potestates diabolicas scilicet et daemoniacas exemplauit, id est exemplum de illis dedit, ut, quem ad modum ipse se exuit carne, sic suos ostenderet exuendos carnalibus uitiis, per quae illi eis dominabantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Then, so that they might not be led astray by the shadows of Judaism, he adds: “In whom also you were circumcised with a circumcision not made with hands, in putting off the body of the flesh” (or, as some have it, “in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh”), “in the circumcision of Christ, buried with him in baptism, in which you also rose with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.” See how here too he shows them to be the body of Christ, so that they may despise these things, cleaving to so great a head of theirs, the mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus, and seeking no false or weak intermediary through which to cleave to God. “And you,” he says, “when you were dead in your trespasses and the foreskin of your flesh” (he called foreskin what the foreskin signifies, that is, the carnal sins which we must put off), “he made alive together with him,” he says, “forgiving you all trespasses, blotting out the handwriting of the decrees that was against us, which was contrary to us” (because the law made men guilty, the law which came in so that trespass might abound), “taking it,” he says, “out of the way and nailing it to the cross; stripping off his flesh, he made an example of the principalities and powers, boldly triumphing over them in himself.” Not good but evil principalities and evil powers, namely devilish and demonic ones, he made an example of, that is, he gave an example concerning them, so that, as he himself stripped off the flesh, he might show that his own are to strip off the carnal vices through which those powers ruled over them.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:11–15 (Augustine's Latin reads “stripping off his flesh” in v. 15); 1 Tim 2:5; Rom 5:20. The reference to Judaism is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.26 (CSEL 44:372–373; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-26).

## Letter 149.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-27
- Source: CSEL 44:373–374
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains Colossians 2:16–18: no one should judge Christians over food or festivals, mere shadows, nor impose a false humility and worship of angels; 'wishing in humility' means affecting humility.

### Latin text

Iam hic diligenter adtende, quem ad modum inferat, propter quod cuncta ista commemorauimus. nemo ergo uos, inquit, iudicet in cibo, tamquam propterea omnia illa dixerit, quia isti per huius modi obseruationes seducebantur a ueritate, qua liberi fiebant, de qua dictum est in euangelio: Et ueritas liberabit uos, id est liberos faciet. nemo ergo uos, inquit, iudicet in cibo aut in potu aut in parte diei festi aut neomeniae aut sabbatorum, quod est umbra futurorum. hoc propter Iudaismum; deinde sequitur propter superstitiones gentilium: Corpus autem Christi, inquit, nemo uos conuincat. turpe est, inquit, et nimis incongruum et a generositate uestrae libertatis alienum, ut, cum sitis corpus Christi, seducamini umbris et conuinci uideamini ueluti peccantes, si haec obseruare neglegitis. corpus ergo Christi nemo uos conuincat uolens in humilitate cordis. hoc si per uerbum Graecum diceretur, etiam in Latina consuetudine populari sonaret usitatius. sic enim et uulgo dicitur, qui diuitem affectat, thelodiues et, qui sapientem, thelosapiens et cetera huius modi; ergo et hic thelohumilis, quod plenius dicitur thelon humilis, id est uolens humilis, affectans humilitatem, quod intellegitur uolens uideri humilis, affectans humilitatem. hoc enim in talibus obseruationibus agitur, ut cor hominis uelut religione humile reddatur. addidit autem et culturam angelorum uel, sicut uestri codices habent, religionem angelorum, quae Graece θρησκεία dicitur, angelos uolens intellegi principatus, quos elementorum mundi huius praepositos in his obseruationibus colendos esse arbitrantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Now notice carefully how he draws the conclusion for whose sake we have mentioned all these things. “Therefore let no one judge you in food,” he says, as if he had said all that because these people were being led away by observances of this kind from the truth by which they were made free, of which it is said in the Gospel, “And the truth will free you,” that is, will make you free. “Therefore let no one judge you in food or in drink, or in respect of a feast day or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come.” This is because of Judaism; then follows, because of the superstitions of the Gentiles: “But let no one convict you, the body of Christ.” It is shameful, he means, and most unfitting and foreign to the nobility of your freedom, that, since you are the body of Christ, you should be led astray by shadows and seem to be convicted as sinners if you neglect to observe these things. “Let no one convict you, the body of Christ, wishing in humility of heart.” If this were said with a Greek word, it would sound more familiar even in popular Latin usage. For thus a man who affects being rich is commonly called thelodives, and one who affects being wise thelosapiens, and so on; so here too thelohumilis, which is more fully said thelon humilis, that is, “wishing humble,” affecting humility, which is understood as wishing to seem humble, affecting humility. For this is what is done in such observances: the heart of man is made humble, as it were, by religion. And he added “and worship of angels,” or, as your manuscripts have it, “religion of angels,” which in Greek is called θρησκεία, meaning by angels the principalities which they think, as set over the elements of this world, must be worshiped in these observances.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:16: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 8:32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:16–18 (Augustine's text: “let no one convict you, the body of Christ”); John 8:32. Thelodives, thelosapiens, thelohumilis are colloquial hybrids from Greek θέλων (“wishing”); Augustine compares the Greek ἐθελο-. The reference to Judaism is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.27 (CSEL 44:373–374; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-27).

## Letter 149.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-28
- Source: CSEL 44:374–375
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's false teacher presses unseen or secretly seen rites, puffed up by false humility, and fails to hold to Christ the head; those who died with Christ should not decree about the world's elements.

### Latin text

Nemo ergo uos, inquit, conuincat, cum sitis corpus Christi, uolens uideri humilis corde in cultura angelorum, quae non uidit inculcans uel, sicut quidam codices habent, quae uidit inculcans. aut enim sic dicere uoluit: Quae non uidit inculcans, quia ista homines suspicionibus et opinionibus agunt, non quod uiderint ita esse facienda, aut certe: Quae uidit inculcans, ideo magna existimans, quia uidit ea quibusdam locis obseruari ab hominibus, quorum auctoritati haberet fidem etiam ratione non reddita, et ideo sibi magnus uidetur, quia ei contigit quorundam sacrorum uidere secreta. sed plenior sensus est: Quae non uidit inculcans frustra inflatus mente carnis suae. mirabiliter ibi eum dixit inflatum mente carnis suae, ubi thelohumilem supra dixerat; fit enim miris modis in anima hominis, ut de falsa humilitate magis infletur, quam si apertius superbiret. et non tenens, inquit, caput — quod uult Christum intellegi —, ex quo omne corpus per contactum et conexum subministratum et copulatum crescit in incrementum dei. si ergo mortui estis cum Christo ab elementis huius mundi, quid adhuc uelut uiuentes de hoc mundo decernitis?

### English translation (Claude)

“Let no one convict you, then,” he says, since you are the body of Christ, “wishing to seem humble of heart in the worship of angels, pressing on things he has not seen,” or, as some manuscripts have, “pressing on things he has seen.” For either he meant to say “pressing on things he has not seen,” because men practice these things on suspicions and opinions, not because they have seen that they must be done so; or else “pressing on things he has seen,” thinking them great because he has seen them observed in certain places by men in whose authority he trusted even without a reason given, and so he thinks himself great because it has fallen to him to see the secrets of certain rites. But the fuller sense is: “pressing on things he has not seen, vainly puffed up by the mind of his flesh.” Wonderfully he said that he is puffed up by the mind of his flesh in the very place where above he had called him “wishing-humble”; for in wonderful ways it happens in the soul of man that he is more puffed up by false humility than if he were more openly proud. “And not holding fast the head,” he says (meaning Christ to be understood), “from which the whole body, supplied and joined through its contacts and connections, grows with the growth of God. If, then, you died with Christ from the elements of this world, why, as though still living, do you make decrees about this world?”

### Scripture references

- Col 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:18–20. Manuscripts of Col 2:18 differ on the negative (“has not seen”/“has seen”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.28 (CSEL 44:374–375; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-28).

## Letter 149.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-29
- Source: CSEL 44:375
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads 'Do not touch, taste, handle' as the false teachers' words, whose abstentions lead to corruption, and takes up Paulinus's question why Paul calls such things a show of wisdom.

### Latin text

His dictis inserit uerba eorum, qui decernunt de hoc mundo per has obseruationes quasi rationabiles affectata uanitate humilitatis inflati: Ne tetigeris, ne gustaueris, ne adtaminaueris. recolamus, quod dictum est superius, ut hoc intellegamus. non uult enim eos in his obseruationibus iudicari, ubi dicitur: Ne tetigeris, ne gustaueris, ne adtaminaueris, quae sunt, inquit, omnia in corruptionem per abusionem. omnia haec, inquit, magis ad corruptionem ualent, cum superstitiose ab his abstinetur, ut eis homo abutatur, id est non eis utatur secundum praecepta et doctrinas hominum. hoc planum est; sed quod sequitur, multum requiris: Quae sunt quidem rationem habentia sapientiae in obseruatione et humilitate cordis et uexatione corporis — uel, sicut alii interpretati sunt, ad non parcendum corpori —, non in honore aliquo ad saturitatem carnis. cur, inquis, haec dicit rationem habere sapientiae, quae ita reprehendit?

### English translation (Claude)

Having said this, he inserts the words of those who make decrees about this world through these supposedly reasonable observances, puffed up with the affected vanity of humility: “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle.” Let us recall what was said above, so as to understand this. For he does not want them to be judged in these observances, where it is said, “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” “which are all,” he says, “for corruption by abuse.” All these things, he means, tend rather to corruption when people abstain from them superstitiously, so that man abuses them, that is, does not use them, “according to the precepts and doctrines of men.” This is plain; but what follows you inquire into closely: “which have indeed a show of wisdom in observance and humility of heart and harshness to the body” (or, as others have translated, “in not sparing the body”), “not in any honor to the satisfying of the flesh.” Why, you say, does he say that these things, which he so rebukes, have a show of wisdom?

### Scripture references

- Col 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:22: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:21–23. Ratio sapientiae is rendered “a show of wisdom” (literally “an account of wisdom”), as Augustine's explanation in 149.30 requires.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.29 (CSEL 44:375; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-29).

## Letter 149.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-30
- Source: CSEL 44:375–376
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The 'wisdom' Paul concedes to such observances is the wisdom of this world, philosophical reasoning about the elements, which humbles the heart superstitiously and afflicts the body to no purpose.

### Latin text

Dicam, quod et ipse in scripturis potes aduertere, saepe sapientiam positam etiam in sedibus mundi huius, quam dicit expressius sapientiam huius mundi. nec moueat, quod hic non addidit mundi; non enim et alio loco, cum ait: Ubi sapiens? ubi scriba? addidit huius mundi, ut diceret: Ubi sapiens huius mundi? et tamen hoc intellegitur. sic et ista ratio sapientiae; nihil enim ab eis dicitur in huius modi superstitiosis obseruationibus, ubi non secundum mundi huius elementa naturarumque rerum ratio quaedam sapientiae reddi uideatur. nam et cum dicit: Cauete, ne quis uos decipiat per philosophiam, non ait huius mundi; et quid est philosophia Latine nisi studium sapientiae? sunt ergo, inquit, ista rationem quidem habentia sapientiae — id est de quibus aliqua ratio reddatur secundum elementa mundi huius et principatus ac potestates — in obseruatione et humilitate cordis — id enim agunt ista, ut superstitionis uitio cor humilietur — ad non parcendum corpori — dum fraudatur istis escis, quibus compellitur abstinere —, non in honore aliquo ad saturitatem carnis, non quod honoratius illo magis quam illo cibo caro saturaretur, cum ad eius necessitatem non pertineat nisi quolibet ualitudini apto alimento refici atque fulciri.

### English translation (Claude)

I shall say what you too can observe in the Scriptures: that wisdom is often placed even in the seats of this world, which he calls more expressly the wisdom of this world. And do not be troubled that he did not add “of the world” here; for in another place too, when he says, “Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe?” he did not add “of this world,” so as to say, “Where is the wise man of this world?” and yet this is understood. So too this “account of wisdom”; for nothing is said by them in observances of this superstitious kind for which some account of wisdom does not seem to be given according to the elements of this world and the natures of things. For when he says, “Beware lest anyone deceive you through philosophy,” he does not say “of this world”; and what is philosophy in Latin but the love of wisdom? “These things, then,” he says, “have indeed an account of wisdom” (that is, things for which some account is given according to the elements of this world and the principalities and powers) “in observance and humility of heart” (for these things aim at this, that the heart be humbled by the vice of superstition), “in not sparing the body” (while it is defrauded of those foods from which it is compelled to abstain), “not in any honor to the satisfying of the flesh” (not that the flesh would be satisfied more honorably by one food than by another, since its need requires only that it be refreshed and supported by any food suitable to health).

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 1:20; Col 2:8, 23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.30 (CSEL 44:375–376; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-30).

## Letter 149.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-31
- Source: CSEL 44:376–378
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's risen body could be unrecognized because God changed its features, just as at the Transfiguration he changed its brightness and as age changes a face.

### Latin text

De euangelio inquisitio tua solet multos mouere, quo modo dominus post resurrectionem, cum in eodem corpore surrexerit, a quibusdam, qui eum nouerant, utriusque sexus hominibus et agnitus non sit et agnitus sit. ubi primum quaeri solet, utrum in eius corpore an potius in illorum oculis aliquid factum sit, quo non posset agnosci. cum enim legitur: Tenebantur oculi eorum, ne agnoscerent eum, impedimentum quoddam agnoscendi uidetur in luminibus factum esse cernentium; cum uero aperte alibi dicitur: Apparuit eis in alia effigie, utique in ipso corpore, cuius alia erat effigies, aliquid factum fuisse, quo impedimento tenerentur, id est moram agnoscendi paterentur oculi illorum. sed ego miror, cum duo sint in corpore, quibus cuiusque species agnoscatur, liniamenta et color, cur ante resurrectionem, quod in monte ita transfiguratus est, ut fieret uultus eius splendidus sicut sol, neminem mouet eum usque ad tantam excellentiam fulgoris et lucis colorem sui corporis mutare potuisse et post resurrectionem mouet aliquatenus liniamenta mutasse, ut non posset agnosci, et rursus eadem potentiae facilitate sicut tunc pristinum colorem sic et post resurrectionem pristina liniamenta reuocasse. nam et illi tres discipuli, ante quorum oculos in monte transfiguratus est, non eum agnoscerent, si ad eos talis aliunde uenisset; sed quia cum illo erant, ipsum esse certissime retinebant. at enim corpus ipsum erat, in quo resurrexit. quid hoc ad rem? nam illud utique ipsum corpus erat, in quo in monte transfiguratus est, et ipsum erat iuuenis, in quo natus est, et tamen, si quis eum iuuenem repente uidisset, qui non nisi infantulum nosset, non utique agnosceret. an uero ad liniamenta mutanda non potest celeriter dei potestas, quod potest per annorum moras hominis aetas?

### English translation (Claude)

Your question about the Gospel usually troubles many: how the Lord after his resurrection, though he rose in the same body, was both not recognized and recognized by some people of both sexes who had known him. Here it is usually asked first whether something was done in his body, or rather in their eyes, so that he could not be recognized. For when we read, “Their eyes were held so that they did not recognize him,” some hindrance to recognition seems to have been placed in the eyes of those who saw; but when it is said plainly elsewhere, “He appeared to them in another form,” something seems certainly to have been done in the body itself, whose form was different, by which their eyes were held, that is, suffered a delay in recognizing. But I am surprised that, since there are two things in a body by which anyone’s appearance is recognized, the features and the color, no one is troubled that before the resurrection, when he was so transfigured on the mountain that his face became bright as the sun, he could change the color of his body to so great an excellence of brightness and light, yet people are troubled that after the resurrection he somewhat changed his features so that he could not be recognized, and again, with the same ease of power, as then he restored his former color, so after the resurrection he restored his former features. For even those three disciples before whose eyes he was transfigured on the mountain would not have recognized him if he had come to them from elsewhere in that state; but because they were with him, they held most certainly that it was he. “But it was the very body in which he rose.” What has this to do with it? For that too was certainly the very body in which he was transfigured on the mountain; and it was the very body as a young man in which he was born; and yet, if someone who had known him only as a little infant had suddenly seen him as a young man, he certainly would not have recognized him. Or can the power of God not change features quickly, when the age of man can do so over the course of years?

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:16: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 16:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 17:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 24:16; Mark 16:12; the Transfiguration: Matt 17:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.31 (CSEL 44:376–378; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-31).

## Letter 149.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-32
- Source: CSEL 44:378
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'Do not touch me' asks for the spiritual touch of faith; Christ's being known in the breaking of bread is a sacrament gathering us to know him.

### Latin text

Quod autem Mariae dixit: Noli me tangere; nondum enim ascendi ad patrem, nihil aliud me noueris intellexisse quam tu. ita enim significare uoluit tactum spiritalem, id est accessum fidei se requirere, qua creditur eum excelsum esse cum patre. et quod ab illis duobus in fractione panis est agnitus, sacramentum esse, quod nos in agnitionem suam congregat, nullus debet ambigere.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what he said to Mary, “Do not touch me; for I have not yet ascended to the Father,” you may know that I have understood nothing other than you have. For he wished to signify that he requires a spiritual touch, that is, the approach of faith, by which he is believed to be on high with the Father. And that he was recognized by those two in the breaking of bread is a sacrament which gathers us into the knowledge of him; no one ought to doubt this.

### Scripture references

- John 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:35: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 20:17; Luke 24:30–31, 35.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.32 (CSEL 44:378; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-32).

## Letter 149.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-33
- Source: CSEL 44:378–379
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The sword piercing Mary's soul is the grief of the passion, when the persecutors' tongues were swords; similarly the 'iron' that passed through Joseph's soul was hard tribulation.

### Latin text

De uerbis Symeonis, ubi ait uirgini matri domini: Et tuam ipsius animam pertransiet framea, in alia epistula, cuius exemplum etiam modo misi, dixi, quid mihi uideatur; quod etiam tibi inter cetera uisum est. et quod adiunxit: Ut denudentur multorum cordium cogitationes, hoc intellegendum puto, quia per domini passionem et insidiae Iudaeorum et discipulorum infirmitas patuit. tribulationem igitur gladii nomine significatam esse credibile est, quo materna anima uulnerata est doloris affectu. ipse fuit gladius in ore persecutorum, de quibus in psalmo dicitur: Et gladius in ore eorum. ipsi enim erant filii hominum, quorum dentes arma et sagittae et lingua eorum gladius acutus. nam et ferrum, quod pertransiit animam Ioseph, pro dura tribulatione positum ferrum mihi uidetur; aperte quippe dicitur: Ferrum pertransiit animam eius, donec ueniret uerbum eius, id est tam diu fuit in dura tribulatione, donec fieret, quod praedixit. hinc enim magnus est habitus et ab illa tribulatione liberatus. sed ne humanae sapientiae tribueretur, quod uenit uerbum eius, id est factum est, quod praedixit, more suo scriptura sancta deo inde dat gloriam et continuo subiungit: Eloquium domini igniuit eum.

### English translation (Claude)

On the words of Simeon, where he says to the virgin mother of the Lord, “And a sword shall pierce your own soul,” I said what I thought in another letter, a copy of which I have also sent now; and it seemed so to you too, among other things. And as to what he added, “that the thoughts of many hearts may be laid bare,” I think it is to be understood that through the Lord’s passion both the plots of the Jews and the weakness of the disciples were made plain. It is credible, then, that tribulation was signified by the name of the sword, by which the mother’s soul was wounded with the feeling of grief. That sword was in the mouth of the persecutors, of whom it is said in the psalm, “And a sword in their mouth.” For they were the sons of men whose teeth are weapons and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword. For the iron that passed through the soul of Joseph also seems to me set for hard tribulation; for it is said plainly, “The iron passed through his soul, until his word came,” that is, he was in hard tribulation until what he had foretold came about. For from this he came to be held great and was freed from that tribulation. But lest it be attributed to human wisdom that his word came, that is, that what he foretold came about, holy Scripture, in its usual way, gives the glory for it to God and adds at once: “The utterance of the Lord set him on fire.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 2:35: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 59:7 (58:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 57:4 (56:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 105:18 (104:18 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 105:19 (104:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 2:35; the other letter is not certainly identified. “A sword in their mouth”: Ps 59:7 (LXX 58:8); “sons of men whose teeth …”: Ps 57:4 (LXX 56:5); Joseph: Ps 105:18–19 (LXX 104:18–19, Latin version). The reference to the Jews is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.33 (CSEL 44:378–379; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-33).

## Letter 149.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-34
- Source: CSEL 44:379–380
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes, noting that Scripture's obscurities allow varied interpretations consistent with sound faith, and sends greetings, including to a young Paulinus recently arrived after a storm.

### Latin text

Ut potui, non defui interrogationibus tuis adiutus orationibus tuis et ipsis, quas misisti, disputationibus tuis. cum enim interrogando disputas, et quaeris acriter et doces humiliter. utile est autem, ut de obscuritatibus diuinarum scripturarum, quas exercitationis nostrae causa deus esse uoluit, multae inueniantur sententiae, cum aliud alii uidetur, quae tamen omnes sanae fidei doctrinaeque concordent. dabis sane ueniam stilo meo multum festinanti, ut iam in naui constituto occurrerem perlatori. filium autem nostrum Paulinum in Christi caritate dulcissimum in hac potius epistula resaluto et paucis ut festinus exhortor, ut misericordiae domini, qui sciens dare auxilium de tribulatione eum turbulentissima tempestate misit in portum, quo tu pelago tranquilliore permeasti ipsi marinae tranquillitati minime credens, et qui eius rudimentis excipiendis atque nutriendis te dedit, gratias agat, quantas potest, et omnia ossa eius dicant: Domine, quis similis tibi? non enim uberiore fructu legit uel audit me docentem ac disserentem uel quibuslibet exhortationibus accendentem, quam inspicit te uiuentem. resalutant sanctam et sincerissimam benignitatem tuam conserui mei, qui mecum sunt. condiaconus autem noster Peregrinus, ex quo a me profectus est cum sancto fratre nostro Urbano, quando episcopatus sarcinam subire perrexit, nondum remeauit Hipponem; saluos eos tamen in nomine Christi et litteris eorum et fama nuntiante cognoscimus. conpresbyterum Paulinum et omnes, qui tua praesentia in domino perfruuntur, germano salutamus affectu.

### English translation (Claude)

As far as I could, I have not failed your questions, helped by your prayers and by the very discussions you sent; for when you discuss by asking, you both inquire keenly and teach humbly. And it is useful that, about the obscurities of the divine Scriptures, which God willed to exist for our exercise, many opinions should be found, when one thing seems right to one and another to another, all of which nevertheless agree with sound faith and doctrine. You will indeed pardon my pen for its great haste, to catch the carrier already on board ship. In this letter rather I greet in return our son Paulinus, most sweet in the love of Christ, and in a few words, being in haste, I exhort him to give all the thanks he can to the mercy of the Lord, who, knowing how to give help in tribulation, sent him into port through a most turbulent storm, the port to which you crossed over a calmer sea, though trusting little in the calm of the sea itself, and who gave you to receive and nourish his first steps; and let all his bones say, “Lord, who is like you?” For he does not read or hear me teaching and discussing or kindling with whatever exhortations to richer fruit than he gains by observing you living. My fellow servants who are with me return greetings to your holy and most sincere kindness. Our fellow deacon Peregrinus, since he set out from me with our holy brother Urbanus when he went to take up the burden of the episcopate, has not yet returned to Hippo; but we know that they are safe in the name of Christ, from their letters and from report. We greet with brotherly affection our fellow presbyter Paulinus and all who enjoy your presence in the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Ps 46:1 (45:2 LXX): allusion, low confidence
- Ps 35:10 (34:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Help in tribulation: Ps 46:1 (LXX 45:2); “All my bones shall say, Lord, who is like you?”: Ps 35:10 (LXX 34:10). Urbanus became bishop of Sicca.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 149.34 (CSEL 44:379–380; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-149-34).

## Letter 150.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-150-1
- Source: CSEL 44:380–382
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine congratulates Proba and Juliana on the consecration of Demetrias, of the Anician family, to virginity, a greater glory than the consulships of her house.

### Latin text

Implestis gaudio cor nostrum tanto iucundius quanto carius, tanto gratius quanto citius. uestrae namque stirpis sanctimoniam uirginalem quoniam quacumque innotuistis ac per hoc ubique fama celeberrima praedicat, uelocissimum uolatum eius fideliore atque certiore litterarum nuntio praeuenistis et prius nos fecistis exultare de cognito tam excellentissimo bono quam dubitare de audito. quis uerbis explicet, quis digno praeconio prosequatur, quantum incomparabiliter gloriosius atque fructuosius habeat ex uestro sanguine feminas uirgines Christus quam uiros consules mundus? nam uolumina temporum si magnum atque praeclarum est nominis dignitate signare, quanto est maius atque praeclarius cordis et corporis integritate transcendere! magis itaque gaudeat puella nobilis genere, nobilior sanctitate, quod sit per diuinum consortium praecipuam in caelis consecutura sublimitatem, quam si esset per humanum conubium prolem propagatura sublimem. generosius quippe elegit Aniciana posteritas tam inlustrem familiam beare nuptias nesciendo quam multiplicare pariendo et in carne iam imitari uitam angelorum quam ex carne numerum adhuc augere mortalium. haec est uberior fecundiorque felicitas non uentre grauescere sed mente grandescere, non lactescere pectore sed corde candescere, non uisceribus terram sed caelum orationibus parturire. dominarum honore dignissimae et merito inlustres et praestantissimae filiae, perfruamini in illa, quod defuit uobis, ut nasceretur ex uobis; perseueret usque in finem adhaerens coniugio, quod non habet finem. imitentur eam multae famulae dominam ignobiles nobilem, fragiliter excelsae excelsius humilem; uirgines, quae sibi optant Aniciorum claritatem, eligant sanctitatem. illud enim quanta libet cupiditate quando adsequentur? hoc autem, si plene cupierint, mox habebunt. protegat uos incolumes et feliciores dextera altissimi. dominae honore dignissimae et praestantissimae filiae. pignera sanctitatis uestrae, praecipue ipsam sanctitate praecipuam debito uestris meritis officio dilectione domini salutamus. uelationis apophoretum gratissime accepimus.

### English translation (Claude)

You have filled our heart with joy, the more delightful because dearer, the more welcome because quicker. For the virgin consecration of a daughter of your house is being proclaimed by widespread fame wherever you are known, and so everywhere; yet you outran its swiftest flight with the more faithful and sure message of a letter, and made us rejoice in the knowledge of so excellent a good before we could doubt it as a rumor. Who could explain in words, who could follow with fitting praise, how incomparably more glorious and fruitful it is for Christ to have women virgins from your blood than for the world to have men consuls? For if it is great and splendid to mark the rolls of the ages with the dignity of one’s name, how much greater and more splendid to rise above them by integrity of heart and body! So let the girl, noble in birth and nobler in holiness, rejoice more that through a divine union she will attain a special height in heaven than if through a human marriage she were to propagate a lofty offspring. For the Anician posterity chose more nobly to bless so illustrious a family by not knowing marriage than to multiply it by childbearing, and already in the flesh to imitate the life of the angels rather than from the flesh still to increase the number of mortals. This is the richer and more fruitful happiness: not to grow heavy in the womb but to grow great in mind; not to grow milky in the breast but to grow white in the heart; to bring forth not earth from the bowels but heaven by prayers. Ladies most worthy of honor, justly illustrious and most excellent daughters, enjoy in her what was lacking in you, that it might be born from you; may she persevere to the end, cleaving to the marriage that has no end. May many handmaids imitate her, the lowly their noble mistress, the frailly exalted her who is more exaltedly humble; let virgins who wish for themselves the renown of the Anicii choose their holiness. For the one, however great their desire, when will they attain it? But the other, if they desire it fully, they will soon have. May the right hand of the Most High protect you safe and more happy, ladies most worthy of honor and most excellent daughters. We greet, with the duty owed to your merits and in the love of the Lord, the pledges of Your Holiness, especially her who excels in holiness. We have received with great pleasure the keepsake of the veiling.

### Scripture references

- Luke 20:36: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Proba (Demetrias's grandmother) and Juliana (her mother), ca. 413–414; the address is not printed in the staged text. Demetrias received the veil at Carthage.
- Virginity and marriage: translated as written. The angelic life: Luke 20:35–36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 150.1 (CSEL 44:380–382; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-150-1).

## Letter 151.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-1
- Source: CSEL 44:382–383
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Caecilianus's complaint about his silence, treating it as a mark of friendship.

### Latin text

Querela de me apud te litteris tuis indita tanto est mihi gratior quanto plenior caritatis. si ergo, quod tacui, purgare coner, quid conabor aliud quam ostendere te non habuisse causam, qua mihi suscensere deberes? sed cum id in te magis diligam, quod de mea reticentia es dignatus offendi, quam inter tuas curas nihil momenti habere credideram, causam meam deseram, si me purgare contendero. si enim indignari non debuisti, quia non ad te scripserim, nihili me pendis, qui, loquarne an taceam, indifferenter feras. porro quia me tacuisse moleste tulisti, indignatio ista dignatio est. non itaque tam doleo me non praebuisse, quam gaudeo te nostrum desiderasse sermonem. nam ueterem amicum et, quod abs te taceri sed a nobis oportet agnosci, talem ac tantum uirum in peregrinis positum curisque publicis laborantem quod nullo fuerim consolatus alloquio, hinc argui meruisse honori mihi est, non maerori. ignosce igitur agenti gratias, quod me indignum non putasti, cui suscenseres tacenti. nunc enim inter tot et tanta negotia non tua sed publica, id est omnium non solum posse esse non onerosas, immo non solum onerosas esse non posse, uerum etiam gratas esse posse litteras meas credidi beniuolentiae tuae, qua excellentiam uincis.

### English translation (Claude)

The complaint about me that you put in your letter is the more welcome to me the fuller it is of love. If, then, I try to clear myself for my silence, what will I be trying to do but show that you had no reason to be angry with me? But since I love in you the fact that you deigned to be offended by my silence, which I had believed to be of no importance amid your cares, I shall be abandoning my own cause if I strive to clear myself. For if you ought not to have been indignant because I did not write to you, you hold me of no account, as one whose speaking or silence you bear with indifference. But since you were troubled by my silence, that indignation is a mark of esteem. So I am not so much sorry that I did not offer you conversation as glad that you missed it. For that I offered no word of comfort to an old friend, and (what you may keep silent but we must acknowledge) so great a man, living abroad and laboring under public cares, to be rebuked for this is an honor to me, not a grief. Pardon me, then, for giving thanks that you did not think me unworthy of your anger at my silence. For now I have trusted your kindness, in which you surpass even your high rank, that amid so many and such great affairs, not your own but public, that is, everyone’s, my letters can be not only not burdensome, indeed not merely incapable of being burdensome, but even welcome.

### Translation notes

- The letter is addressed to Caecilianus, an imperial official (ca. 413–414); the address is not printed in the staged text.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.1 (CSEL 44:382–383; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-1).

## Letter 151.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-2
- Source: CSEL 44:383–384
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains he had not written because Caecilianus had forwarded Pope Innocent's letter without one of his own; he had written only to commend a friend.

### Latin text

Cum enim accepissem mihi a fratribus epistulam missam sancti et praecipuis meritis uenerandi papae Innocentii, quam per tuam praestantiam ad me datam certis declararetur indiciis, ideo nullam tuam paginam simul aduectam esse putaueram, quod scribendi et rescribendi cura nolueris grauioribus rebus occupatus obstringi. nam utique consentaneum uidebatur, ut qui mihi tam sancti uiri et tam sancta scripta perferre dignatus es, ea sumere adiunctis tuis. hinc ergo statueram non esse oneri litteris meis animo tuo, nisi esset necesse commendandi alicuius gratia, cui hoc negare non possem intercessionis officio, quae solet nostra esse omnibus concedendi consuetudo et quaedam etiam importuna non tamen inprobanda professio. itaque feci; nam amicum meum commendaui benignitati tuae, a quo etiam tua rescripta iam sumpsi agente gratias, quas et ipse ago.

### English translation (Claude)

For when I received from the brothers a letter sent to me by the holy pope Innocent, venerable for his outstanding merits, which was shown by sure signs to have been given me through Your Excellency, I supposed that no page of yours had been brought with it because, occupied with weightier matters, you did not wish to be bound by the care of writing and replying. For it certainly seemed fitting that, since you deigned to convey to me the writings of so holy a man, so holy themselves, I should receive them with some of yours attached. So I had decided not to burden your mind with my letters unless it were necessary for commending someone to whom I could not refuse the duty of intercession, which is our usual habit of granting to everyone and a kind of profession, importunate perhaps but not to be disapproved. And so I did; for I commended a friend of mine to your kindness, from whom I have already received your reply, as he gives thanks, which I also give.

### Translation notes

- Innocent I, bishop of Rome 401–417.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.2 (CSEL 44:383–384; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-2).

## Letter 151.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-3
- Source: CSEL 44:384
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that after the treacherous execution (of Marcellinus and his brother) he left Carthage secretly, unable to bear having to entreat the man responsible for the lives of others sheltering in the church.

### Latin text

Si quid autem de te mali existimarem praesertim in ea causa, quam etiam non expressam tamen mihi tua epistula redolebat, absit, ut ad te tale aliquid scriberem, ubi ullum uel mihi uel cuiquam beneficium postularem. aut enim conticescerem obseruans tempus, ubi te possem habere praesentem, aut, si litteris agendum putarem, illud potius agerem et sic agerem, ut dolorem meum ferre uix posses. nam ideo post illius impiam crudelemque perfidiam, cui etiam per tuam nobiscum participatam sollicitudinem frustra uehementer institimus, ne illo cor nostrum dolore percelleret, suam uero conscientiam tanto scelere trucidaret, continuo sum a Carthagine profectus occultato abscessu meo, ne tot ac tanti, qui eius et intra ecclesiam gladium formidabant, uiolentis fletibus et gemitibus me tenerent putantes meam sibi aliquid posse prodesse praesentiam, ut, quem satis digne pro eius anima obiurgare non possem, pro illorum corporibus etiam rogare compellerer quam tamen eorum corporalem salutem satis parietes ecclesiae muniebant. ego autem duris coartabar angustiis, quod neque ille me pateretur, qualem oporteret, et insuper facere cogerer, quod non deceret. dolebam etiam grauiter uicem uenerabilis coepiscopi mei, tantae rectoris ecclesiae, ad cuius pertinere dicebatur officium post hominis tam nefariam fallaciam adhuc se praebere humilem, quo ceteris parceretur. fateor: cum tantum malum nullo pectoris robore potuissem tolerare, discessi.

### English translation (Claude)

But if I thought anything evil of you, especially in the matter which your letter, though it did not name it, still breathed of, far be it from me to write to you anything of this kind in which I asked any favor for myself or anyone. For either I would have kept silent, waiting for a time when I could have you present, or, if I thought it must be dealt with by letter, I would rather have dealt with that, and in such a way that you could scarcely bear my grief. For it was for this reason that, after that man’s impious and cruel treachery (we had pressed him vehemently but in vain, with your concern shared with us, not to strike our hearts with that grief and slaughter his own conscience with so great a crime), I set out from Carthage at once, concealing my departure, lest the many important people who feared his sword even inside the church should hold me back with violent weeping and groaning, thinking that my presence could be of some use to them; so that I would be compelled to entreat for their bodies one whom I could not rebuke worthily enough for his soul. Yet the walls of the church protected their bodily safety well enough. But I was pressed by hard straits: he would not have allowed me to be what I ought to be, and besides I would have been forced to do what was not fitting. I also grieved deeply for my venerable fellow bishop, ruler of so great a church, whose duty it was said to be, after the man’s so wicked deceit, still to show himself humble toward him, so that the others might be spared. I confess it: since I could not have borne so great an evil with any strength of heart, I left.

### Translation notes

- The man is the count Marinus, who in September 413 had the tribune Marcellinus and his brother Apringius executed. The venerable fellow bishop is Aurelius of Carthage.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.3 (CSEL 44:384; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-3).

## Letter 151.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-4
- Source: CSEL 44:384–385
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine does not believe that Caecilianus prompted the executions, but asks him to pardon those who suspect it, given his known grievance against one brother and his close friendship with Marinus.

### Latin text

Haec esset et nunc silentii mei causa apud te, quae fuit tunc discessionis meae, si te apud illum egisse crederem, ut tam nefarie tuas ulcisceretur iniurias. credunt ista, qui nesciunt, quo modo et quotiens et quae nobis dixeris, cum anxia cura perageremus, ut, quanto tibi familiarius inhaerebat, quanto ad eum crebrius uentitabas, quanto saepius cum solo conloquebaris, tanto magis curaret existimationem tuam, ne his, qui tui dicebantur inimici, talem exitum daret, ut nihil cum illo aliud egisse putareris. quod quidem nec ego credo nec hi fratres mei, qui et in loquelis audierunt et in auditu atque omni motu uiderunt signa benigni pectoris tui. sed, obsecro te, ignosce credentibus; homines enim sunt et in animis hominum tantae latebrae sunt et tanti recessus, ut omnes suspiciosi cum merito culpentur, etiam laudari arbitrentur se debere, quod cauti sint. causae stabant; ab uno eorum, quos teneri ille repente praeceperat, grauissimam te passum fuisse iniuriam noueramus. frater quoque eius, in quo ecclesiam maxime persecutus est, nescio quid duriter quasi pro fratre tibi respondisse dicebatur. putabantur tibi ambo esse suspecti. postulati cum abissent, te illic remanente et cum illo secretius, ut ferebatur, loquente subito iussi sunt adtineri. amicitiam uestram non recentem sed ueterem homines loquebantur. famam confirmabat tanta coniunctio et tam assidua solius cum solo sermocinatio. potestas illius magna tunc erat; calumniae facilitas adiacebat. non erat grande negotium procurari aliquem, qui diceret, quod salute promissa dicendum ille mandasset. omnia in tempore ista suffragabantur, ut etiam uno teste tamquam inuidioso et credibili crimine sine iubentis discrimine quilibet de medio tolleretur.

### English translation (Claude)

This would be the reason for my silence toward you now, as it was then the reason for my departure, if I believed that you had persuaded him to avenge your injuries so wickedly. Those believe it who do not know how, how often, and what you said to us when we were working with anxious care to see that, the more intimately he was attached to you, the more often you came to him, the more often you spoke with him alone, the more he should take care for your reputation, so as not to give such an end to those who were said to be your enemies that you would be thought to have done nothing else with him. This neither I believe nor these brothers of mine who both heard in your speech and saw in your hearing and every movement the signs of your kindly heart. But, I beg you, pardon those who believe it; for they are men, and in the minds of men there are such hiding places and such recesses that all suspicious people, though they are rightly blamed, even think they deserve praise for being cautious. There were grounds: we knew that you had suffered a very grave injury from one of those whom he suddenly ordered to be arrested. His brother too, in whom he especially persecuted the Church, was said to have answered you somewhat harshly, as if on his brother’s behalf. Both were thought to be suspect to you. When, after being summoned, they had gone away, while you remained there and spoke with him more privately, as was reported, they were suddenly ordered to be detained. People spoke of your friendship as not recent but old. So close a connection and such constant private conversation, one with one, confirmed the report. His power was great then; slander was easy. It was no great matter to procure someone to say, on a promise of his own safety, what the other had ordered him to say. Everything at that time favored it, so that, even on one witness, as for an odious and credible crime, anyone could be done away with without risk to the one who ordered it.

### Translation notes

- The brother “in whom he especially persecuted the Church” is Marcellinus, who had presided at the Conference of Carthage against the Donatists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.4 (CSEL 44:384–385; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-4).

## Letter 151.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-5
- Source: CSEL 44:385–386
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops were deceived by promises while a bishop went to the emperor; on the eve of the execution Caecilianus swore at the altar that he had urged Marinus to spare the brothers.

### Latin text

Nos interea, quoniam rumor erat, quod ecclesiastica manus posset eos eripere, falsis promissionibus ludebamur, ut illo non solum quasi uolente sed etiam instante pro eis ad comitatum episcopus mitteretur ea pollicitatione interposita episcopalibus auribus, quod, donec aliquid pro eis illic ageretur, nullum causae illorum agitaretur examen. postremo pridie, quam ferirentur, uenit ad nos praestantia tua; spem dedisti, qualem numquam antea dederas, quod eos tibi posset concedere profecturo, quoniam illi grauiter prudenterque dixisses, totum, quod tecum tam assidue familiarius et secretius loqueretur, non te honorari potius quam grauari atque ad id ualere, ut de communicato et pertractato inter uos mortis eorum consilio nemo dubitaret, si illa post haec omnia sequeretur. quae cum te dixisse nobis indicares, inter narrandum exiluisti manusque tendens in eum locum, ubi celebrantur sacramenta fidelium, stupentibus nobis ita iurasti te ista dixisse, ut non solum tunc uerum etiam nunc post tam horrendum et inopinatum exitum, cum tuos omnes motus recolo, nimis mihi inpudens uidear, si de te aliquid mali credam. quibus tuis uerbis sic eum permotum fuisse dicebas, ut non desperares, quod uelut familiare uiaticum tibi eorum donaturus esset salutem.

### English translation (Claude)

Meanwhile, since there was a rumor that the hand of the Church might rescue them, we were deluded with false promises, so that, with him not only apparently willing but even urging it, a bishop was sent to the court on their behalf, with the promise put into the bishops’ ears that, until something was done for them there, no examination of their case would be held. Finally, the day before they were struck down, Your Excellency came to us. You gave us hope such as you had never given before, that he might grant them to you as you were setting out, since you had told him seriously and wisely that all his constant, intimate, and private conversation with you did not honor you but burdened you, and would have this effect, that no one would doubt that the plan of their death had been shared and discussed between you, if their death followed after all this. When you told us that you had said this, in the middle of your account you sprang up, stretched out your hands toward the place where the sacraments of the faithful are celebrated, and, while we were astonished, swore that you had said these things, in such a way that not only then but even now, after so horrible and unexpected an end, when I recall all your movements, I would seem to myself utterly shameless if I believed anything evil of you. You said that he was so moved by your words that you did not despair that he would grant you their safety as a kind of friendly parting gift.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.5 (CSEL 44:385–386; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-5).

## Letter 151.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-6
- Source: CSEL 44:386–387
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts the shock of the sudden execution on the eve of Cyprian's feast, in a nearby place chosen to forestall the Church's intervention, which made many suspect Caecilianus.

### Latin text

Unde fateor dilectioni tuae, postero die, quo illius parturitionis nefarius fetus est editus, cum esset nobis repente nuntiatum illos e carcere ad eum iudicem ductos, quamquam perturbati fuerimus, tamen ego considerans, et quae nobis pridie dixeras et quis esset post illum exorturus dies, quoniam beati Cypriani erat pridiana sollemnitas, existimaui, quod etiam elegerit diem, quo et tibi postulata concederet et uniuersam Christi ecclesiam repente laetificans ad locum tanti martyris ascendere uoluerit parcendi benignitate quam occidendi potestate sublimior, cum ecce nobis nuntius inruit quo prius percussos esse nossemus, quam, quo modo audirentur, quaerere ualeremus. prouisus enim erat et proximus locus non suppliciis hominum deputatus sed ornamento potius ciuitatis, ubi merito creditur propterea quosdam ante aliquot dies iussisse mactari, ne in istis inuidiosa nouitas esset, quos consilium fuit sic posse subripi ecclesiae, si non solum subito feriri iuberentur, uerum etiam in loco proximo ferirentur. satis itaque indicauit ei matri se inferre non timuisse cruciatum, cuius timuit interuentum, ecclesiae scilicet sanctae, inter cuius fideles in eius gremio baptizatos et ipsum utique noueramus post hunc igitur tanti moliminis exitum, cum tam diligenter nobiscum actum esset, ut etiam per te etsi nesciente te paene securi et paene certi de salute illorum pridie fieremus, quis non talium, qualis hominum multitudo est, indubitatum habeat etiam a te ipso nobis uerba data, illis animam ablatam? ideo, sicut dixi, uir bone, etiamsi nos hoc non credimus, ignosce credentibus.

### English translation (Claude)

So I confess to Your Affection that on the next day, when the wicked offspring of that labor was brought forth, and it was suddenly reported to us that they had been taken from prison before that judge, although we were alarmed, yet I, considering both what you had told us the day before and what day was to follow (since it was the eve of the feast of blessed Cyprian), thought he had even chosen the day on which he would both grant you your requests and, suddenly gladdening the whole Church of Christ, would go up to the place of so great a martyr more exalted by the kindness of sparing than by the power of killing; when, behold, a messenger burst in on us, from whom we learned that they had been struck down before we could ask how they were being heard. For a place had been provided close by, not set apart for the punishment of men but rather an ornament of the city, where, it is rightly believed, he had ordered some others to be put to death a few days before, so that there might be no invidious novelty in the case of these men, whom his plan was to be able to snatch from the Church by ordering them not only to be struck down suddenly but also in a nearby place. So he showed plainly enough that he did not fear to inflict torment on that mother whose intervention he feared, namely the holy Church, among whose faithful, baptized in her bosom, we knew him also to be. After the outcome, then, of so great a scheme, when we had been dealt with so carefully that even through you, though without your knowledge, we were almost secure and almost certain of their safety the day before, who among men such as the multitude are would not take it as beyond doubt that you too gave us words and took their lives? Therefore, as I said, good sir, even if we do not believe this, pardon those who do.

### Translation notes

- The feast of Cyprian is 14 September; the execution was on 13 September 413.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.6 (CSEL 44:386–387; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-6).

## Letter 151.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-7
- Source: CSEL 44:387–388
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Caecilianus to break with Marinus, whose crime wounded his own soul more than his victims, for death harms no one whose life was good.

### Latin text

Absit autem a corde et qualicumque uita mea, ut apud te pro aliquo intercederem uel a te cuiquam beneficium postularem, si te crederem tanti huius mali et tam consceleratae crudelitatis auctorem. sed plane fateor, si etiam posthac in ea familiaritate estis, in qua antea fuistis, — pace tua sit liber dolor — multum nos, quod nolebamus, compellitis credere. est autem consentaneum, ut neque hoc credam, qui de te illa non credo. amicus tuus inopinato successu repentinae potestatis non magis persecutus est illorum uitam quam tuam famam. nec ista dicens odia tua in illum mei animi ac professionis oblitus inflammo, sed ad fideliorem prouoco dilectionem. qui enim sic agit cum malis, ut eos malitiae paeniteat, nouit etiam indignatione consulere; nam sicut mali obsunt assentando, ita boni et aduersando prosunt. suam quippe animam eodem ferro, quo alios insolentissime occidit, grauius altiusque percussit, quod post hanc uitam, si non eam paenitendo correxerit et patientia dei bene usus fuerit, inuenire ac sentire cogetur. saepe autem uita praesens etiam bonorum alto dei iudicio malis eripienda permissa est, ne talia perpeti putaretur malum. occidi quippe in carne quid potest obesse morituris? aut quid agunt, qui mori timent, nisi ut paulo serius moriantur? quicquid obest morientibus, ex uita, non ex morte contingit; in qua illi si tales animas habuerunt, qualibus Christiana gratia subuenitur, non sane mors eorum uitae bonae occasus fuit sed melioris occasio.

### English translation (Claude)

Far be it from my heart and from my life, such as it is, that I should intercede with you for anyone or ask a favor from you for anyone, if I believed you the author of this great evil and of so criminal a cruelty. But I plainly confess that, if even after this you are on the same intimate terms as before (let my grief be free, with your leave), you compel us to believe much that we do not wish to believe. Yet it is consistent that, as I do not believe those things of you, I should not believe this either. Your friend, by the unexpected success of sudden power, attacked their lives no more than your reputation. Nor, in saying this, do I inflame your hatred against him, forgetting my own mind and profession; rather I call you to a more faithful love. For he who deals with the wicked so that they repent of their wickedness knows how to help them even by indignation; for as the wicked harm by flattering, so the good help even by opposing. For with the same sword with which he so insolently killed others he struck his own soul more gravely and deeply, which after this life, unless he amends it by repentance and makes good use of God’s patience, he will be compelled to find and feel. And often, by the deep judgment of God, even the present life of the good is permitted to be snatched away by the wicked, so that suffering such things may not be thought an evil. For what harm can being killed in the flesh do to those who are going to die? Or what do those who fear to die achieve, except to die a little later? Whatever harms the dying comes from their life, not from their death; and if in that life they had souls such as Christian grace helps, their death was not the setting of a good life but the occasion of a better one.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.7 (CSEL 44:387–388; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-7).

## Letter 151.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-8
- Source: CSEL 44:388–389
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts the worldly elder brother (Apringius) with the devout Marcellinus, whose virtues he praises, and who would have entered religious life had he not been married.

### Latin text

Et maioris quidem mores apparebant huic saeculo amiciores esse quam Christo, quamquam et ipse iuuenalem prius saecularemque uitam uxore ducta non parua ex parte correxerat. non tamen fortasse misericors deus fratris eum esse in morte comitem nisi miserans uoluit. ille uero alius religiose uixit et multum corde uitaque Christiana. haec eum fama praecessit, ut in causa ecclesiae sic ueniret; haec consecuta est, cum uenisset. quae illi uero probitas in moribus, in amicitia fides, in doctrina studium, in religione sinceritas, in coniugio pudicitia; in iudicio continentia, erga inimicos patientia, erga amicos affabilitas, erga sanctos humilitas, erga omnes caritas, in beneficiis praestandis facilitas, in petendis pudor, in recte factis amor, in peccatis dolor! quantum decus honestatis, qui splendor gratiae, quae cura pietatis, quae in subueniendo misericordia, in ignoscendo beniuolentia, in orando fiducia! quod salubriter sciebat, qua modestia loquebatur! quod inutiliter nesciebat, qua diligentia scrutabatur! quantus in eo contemptus rerum praesentium, quanta spes et desiderium bonorum aeternorum! ne relictis omnibus saecularibus actionibus susciperet cingulum militiae Christianae, uinculum praepediebat uxorium, quo iam innodatus coeperat concupiscere meliora, quando iam non licebat illa quamuis inferiora disrumpere.

### English translation (Claude)

The character of the elder brother indeed appeared more friendly to this world than to Christ, although he too had corrected his earlier youthful and worldly life in no small measure after he married. Yet perhaps the merciful God did not will him to be his brother’s companion in death except in mercy. But the other lived religiously and was much a Christian in heart and life. This reputation went before him, so that he came in the Church’s cause; it followed him when he had come. What uprightness in his conduct, what faithfulness in friendship, what zeal in learning, what sincerity in religion, what chastity in marriage, what restraint in judgment, what patience toward enemies, what affability toward friends, what humility toward the saints, what love toward all, what readiness in granting favors, what modesty in asking them, what love for right deeds, what grief for sins! What grace of honor, what splendor of charm, what care for piety, what mercy in helping, what kindness in forgiving, what confidence in praying! What he knew to profit, with what modesty he spoke it! What he did not know to his loss, with what diligence he searched into it! How great his contempt for present things, how great his hope and desire for eternal goods! Only the bond of marriage hindered him from leaving all secular business and taking up the belt of Christian service; already tied by it, he had begun to desire better things when it was no longer lawful to break those bonds, though they are lower.

### Translation notes

- The elder brother is Apringius, proconsul of Africa; the other is the tribune Marcellinus, sent in the Church's cause to preside over the Conference of Carthage (411). The belt of Christian service: the monastic or clerical life. The marriage bond as indissoluble: translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.8 (CSEL 44:388–389; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-8).

## Letter 151.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-9
- Source: CSEL 44:389
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In prison Marcellinus welcomed suffering as punishment for sins in this life, and swore to Augustine that he had never known any woman but his wife.

### Latin text

Quodam die frater eius, cum iam pariter in custodia tenerentur, ait illi: Si ego haec pro meritis patior peccatorum meorum, tu, cuius uitam nouimus tam attente feruenterque Christianam, quibus malis meritis ad ista perductus es? at ille: Paruumne, inquit, mihi existimas conferri diuinitus beneficium, si tamen hoc testimonium tuum de uita mea uerum est, ut hoc, quod patior, etiam si usque ad effusionem sanguinis patiar, ibi mea peccata puniantur nec mihi ad futurum iudicium reseruentur? hic forte aliquis credat eum fuisse sibi conscium aliquorum occultorum inpudicitiae peccatorum. dicam ergo, quid me dominus deus ad magnam meam consolationem ex eius ore audire et plane scire uoluerit. cum de hoc ipso, ut sunt humana, sollicitus solus cum solo agerem iam in eadem custodia constituto, ne quid esset, unde maiore et insigniore paenitentia deum sibi placare deberet, ille, ut erat uerecundiae singularis, cum ipsam licet falsam meam suspicionem erubesceret, sed admonitionem gratissime acciperet, modeste grauiterque subridens et utraque manu meam dexteram adprehendens: (Testor), inquit, sacramenta, quae per hanc offeruntur manum, me nullum expertum esse concubitum praeter uxorem nec ante nec postea.

### English translation (Claude)

One day, when they were already held in custody together, his brother said to him: “If I suffer these things for the deserts of my sins, you, whose life we know to be so attentively and fervently Christian, by what bad deserts have you been brought to this?” And he said: “Do you think it a small benefit conferred on me by God, if indeed your testimony about my life is true, that what I suffer, even if I suffer it to the shedding of blood, should be the punishment of my sins here, and they should not be reserved for me for the judgment to come?” Here perhaps someone may believe that he was conscious of some hidden sins of unchastity. I shall tell, then, what the Lord God willed me to hear from his mouth and know plainly, to my great comfort. When, being anxious about this very thing, as human beings are, I spoke with him alone when he was already in that custody, lest there should be anything for which he ought to appease God by a greater and more conspicuous penance, he, being of singular modesty, while blushing at my suspicion, false though it was, yet receiving my admonition most gratefully, smiled modestly and gravely and, taking my right hand in both his hands, said: “I call to witness the sacraments that are offered by this hand that I have known no intercourse except with my wife, either before or after.”

### Translation notes

- Penance: the church discipline for grave sins. The oath by the sacraments offered by Augustine's hand refers to the eucharist.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.9 (CSEL 44:389; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-9).

## Letter 151.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-10
- Source: CSEL 44:389–390
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Marcellinus lost nothing by death; Marinus, who defied the Church and Christ, harmed only himself, and Caecilianus's innocence and good name remain intact.

### Latin text

Quid ergo huic in morte accidit mali ac non potius plurimum boni, cum haec habens dona ad Christum, sine quo inaniter habentur, ex hac uita migrarit? quae apud te non commemorarem, si crederem te laudibus eius offendi; cum autem hoc non credo, nec illud profecto, quod te non dico instante sed saltem uolente aut optante posset occidi. proinde iudicas nobiscum tanto sincerius quanto innocentius, quod ille cum anima sua quam cum istius corpore crudelius egerit, quando contemptis nobis, contemptis promissionibus suis, contemptis tot ac tantis petitionibus et admonitionibus tuis, contempta denique ecclesia Christi et in ea quo nisi Christo ad finem suae machinationis huius morte peruenit. an uero illius honor istius uel carceri comparandus est, cum ille fureret sublimatus, iste gauderet inclusus? horrendis et poenalibus tenebris omnes non carceres sed etiam inferos uincit scelerati hominis conscientia. tibi etiam quid nocuit, cuius etsi famam grauiter laesit, tamen innocentiam non perimit? quamuis fama quoque ipsa salua sit et apud eos, qui te melius nouerunt quam nos, et apud nos ipsos, qui curas nobiscum tuas, ne tam immane perpetraretur scelus, tanto expressas inspiciebamus affectu, ut tui cordis inuisibilia paene oculis cerneremus. sibi igitur ille nocuit, quicquid nocuit; suam transfixit animam, suam uitam, suam conscientiam, suam denique ipsam famam, quam bonam solent etiam pessimi concupiscere, caeca illa crudelitate uastauit. tanto enim est odiosior omnibus bonis, quanto magis impiis placere conatus est uel placuisse laetatus.

### English translation (Claude)

What evil, then, befell him in death, and not rather the greatest good, since, having these gifts, he departed this life to Christ, without whom they are possessed in vain? I would not mention these things to you if I believed you were offended by his praises; but as I do not believe this, neither, surely, do I believe that he could be killed, I do not say at your urging, but even with your wish or desire. Accordingly, you judge with us, the more sincerely the more innocently, that the other dealt more cruelly with his own soul than with this man’s body, when, despising us, despising his own promises, despising your many and great petitions and admonitions, despising finally the Church of Christ, and in her whom but Christ, he reached the end of this scheme of his by this death. Or is that man’s high office to be compared even with this man’s prison, when the one raged in his exaltation and the other rejoiced in his confinement? The conscience of a criminal surpasses in horrible and penal darkness not only all prisons but even hell. To you, too, what harm did he do? Though he gravely injured your reputation, he does not destroy your innocence; and indeed your reputation itself is safe both with those who know you better than we do, and with us ourselves, who saw your efforts with us to prevent so monstrous a crime expressed with such feeling that we almost saw with our eyes the invisible things of your heart. Whatever harm he did, then, he did to himself: he pierced his own soul, his own life, his own conscience, and finally laid waste by that blind cruelty his very reputation, which even the worst men usually desire to be good. For he is the more hateful to all good men the more he tried to please the wicked, or rejoiced in having pleased them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.10 (CSEL 44:389–390; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-10).

## Letter 151.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-11
- Source: CSEL 44:390–391
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The emperor had ordered the brothers released without even the stigma of a pardon, so Marinus acted from gratuitous cruelty; Caecilianus should detest his deed out of true love for him.

### Latin text

Ubi autem magis potuit apparere non eum habuisse necessitatem, quam se habere confinxit, ut eius obtentu tamquam bonus faceret tantum malum, quam quod nec illi placuit, de cuius praecepto se ausus est excusare? referat praestantiae tuae sanctus diaconus, Quintianus — ipse enim fuerat episcopo, quem pro illis miseramus, adiunctus —, quem ad modum nec indulgentia illis danda uisa est, ne uel sic aliquo crimine notarentur, sed tantum commonitorium, quo eos ab omni molestia liberos dimittere iuberetur. gratuita igitur crudelitate nulla necessitate, quamuis et aliae causae, quas suspicamur nec opus est committere litteris, forsitan fuerint, atrociter contristauit ecclesiam, ad cuius ecclesiae gremium frater eius metuens perire confugerat, ut eum uiuum tanti sceleris consiliarium reperiret, cuius ecclesiae etiam ipse cum patronum offendisset, petiuit auxilium nec ei potuit denegari. hunc si diligis, detestare; si non uis, ut in aeternum puniatur, exhorre. sic existimationi tuae, sic est uitae illius consulendum: nam qui in eo diligit, quod odit deus, non solum odit ipsum sed etiam se ipsum.

### English translation (Claude)

But where could it appear more clearly that he did not have the necessity he pretended to have, so that under its cover he might do so great an evil as though a good man, than in the fact that it did not please even him by whose command he dared to excuse himself? Let the holy deacon Quintianus tell Your Excellency (for he had been attached to the bishop whom we had sent for them) how it was decided that not even a pardon should be given them, lest even so they be marked with some crime, but only an instruction ordering that they be released free from all trouble. By gratuitous cruelty, then, under no necessity (though there may perhaps have been other causes, which we suspect and which need not be committed to writing), he cruelly saddened the Church; to the bosom of that Church his brother, fearing to perish, had fled, only to find him alive as the counselor of so great a crime; and from that same Church he himself, when he had offended his patron, sought help, and it could not be denied him. If you love him, detest this; if you do not want him to be punished for ever, shrink from it. Thus must you provide for your reputation, thus for his life; for he who loves in him what God hates hates not only him but also himself.

### Translation notes

- The bishop sent to the court and the details of the brother's flight to the church are not further identified.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.11 (CSEL 44:390–391; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-11).

## Letter 151.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-12
- Source: CSEL 44:391
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Caecilianus to use his friendship to bring Marinus to repentance and to tell him what he did on the day of the execution.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, nec de tua benignitate credo, quod tanti sceleris auctor uel particeps fueris nosque malitiosa crudelitate fefelleris, quod absit a uita et moribus tuis, nec amicitias uestras tales uolo, quibus et ille in suum interitum glorietur de malo et confirmetur humana suspicio, sed tales potius, quibus ad paenitentiam deponatur et talem ac tantam paenitentiam, qualem quantamque postulant tam horrenda uulnera medicinam. tanto quippe illi amicior eris quanto sceleribus eius inimicior. cupio sane praestantiae tuae nosse rescriptis, ubi eo die fueris, quo illud admissum est, quo modo acceperis, quid postea egeris, utrum eum uideris, quid ei dixeris, quid ab illo audieris. ego enim ex quo inde postridie repente discessi, nihil, quod ad hanc rem adtinet, de te audire potui.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, I neither believe of your kindness that you were the author of or accomplice in so great a crime and deceived us with malicious cruelty (far be that from your life and character), nor do I want your friendship to be such that he may glory in his evil to his own destruction and human suspicion be confirmed, but rather such that he may be brought down to repentance, and to a repentance of such a kind and extent as so horrible wounds demand for medicine. For you will be the more his friend the more you are an enemy of his crimes. I would like to know from Your Excellency’s reply where you were on the day it was committed, how you took it, what you did afterward, whether you saw him, what you said to him, what you heard from him. For since I left there suddenly the next day, I have been able to hear nothing of you concerning this matter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.12 (CSEL 44:391; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-12).

## Letter 151.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-13
- Source: CSEL 44:391–392
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he stays away from Carthage because of its toil, his ill health and age, and his resolve to devote his free time to writing for the Church.

### Latin text

Quod uero in epistula tua legi iam te cogi credere, ne a me uidereris et Carthagini me negatum, tu potius cogis his uerbis, ut absentiae meae causas non taceam. quarum est una, quoniam laborem, quem in illa urbe perpeti necesse est et quem si exponere uelim, aliud tantum loquendum est, iam sustinere non possum, quod infirmitati meae propriae, quae nota est omnibus, qui familiarius me nouerunt, accessit etiam senectus, quae generis humani est communis infirmitas. altera causa est, quod statui, si dominus uelit, quantum mihi ab aliis occupationibus, quas ecclesiae, cui proprio munere seruio, necessitas flagitat, datur temporis, id totum inpendere labori studiorum ad ecclesiasticas litteras pertinentium, ubi me arbitror, si dei misericordiae placet, etiam posteris aliquid profuturum.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what I read in your letter, that you are now compelled to believe that I have denied myself to Carthage so as not to see you, by these words you rather compel me not to keep silent about the reasons for my absence. One of them is that I can no longer bear the labor that must be endured in that city (to explain which would need as much again as I have said), since to my own weakness, which is known to all who know me more intimately, old age too has been added, the common weakness of the human race. The other reason is that I have decided, if the Lord wills, to spend all the time left me by the other occupations which the needs of the church I serve by my own office demand on the labor of studies pertaining to the Church’s literature, in which I think, if it pleases the mercy of God, I may be of some use even to posterity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.13 (CSEL 44:391–392; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-13).

## Letter 151.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-14
- Source: CSEL 44:392–393
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes Caecilianus for remaining a catechumen instead of being baptized; the letter breaks off.

### Latin text

Unum est autem, si uerum quaeris audire, quod in te molestissime fero, quod, cum sis et huius iam aetatis et huius uitae atque probitatis, adhuc uis esse catechumenus, quasi fideles non possint, quanto sint fideliores atque meliores, tanto fidelius ac melius administrare rem publicam. quid autem boni agitis in his tantis curis et laboribus uestris, nisi ut bene sit hominibus? si enim hoc non agitis, uel dormire satius est noctes diesque quam uigilare in laboribus publicis nulli utilitati hominum profuturis. nec sane dubito excellentiam tuam prudenti.............

### English translation (Claude)

There is one thing, if you want to hear the truth, that I take very hard in you: that, though you are of such an age and of such a life and uprightness, you still wish to be a catechumen, as if the faithful could not administer the state the more faithfully and well the more faithful and better they are. For what good do you do in all your great cares and labors except that it may be well with men? For if you do not do this, it would be better to sleep night and day than to stay awake in public labors that will be of no use to anyone. Nor do I doubt that Your Excellency, being prudent …

### Translation notes

- The rest of the letter is lost; the edition marks the break, shown as “…”. A catechumen was enrolled for instruction but not yet baptized.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 151.14 (CSEL 44:392–393; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-151-14).

## Letter 152.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-152-1
- Source: CSEL 44:393–395
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius, vicar of Africa, writes to Augustine asking whether episcopal intercession for criminals is consistent with religion, since it seems to approve their crimes, especially when they keep their gains.

### Latin text

Optatas admodum sanctitatis tuae litteras accepi per Bonifatium, uenerandae legis antistitem, quem ego eo magis receptum dilexi, quod ad me desiderata pertulerat, sermonem sanctitatis tuae et incolumitatem, domine merito uenerabilis et unice colende pater. itaque sine mora, quod optabat, obtinuit. uerum quoniam extitit occasio, hoc ipsum, quantulumcumque est, quod admonitus indulsi, nolo sine mercede remanere. cupio enim accipere eam, quae mihi commodet sine pendentis incommodo, immo quae mihi commodet cum gloria dependentis. Officium sacerdotii uestri esse dicitis interuenire pro reis et, nisi obtineatis, offendi, quasi, quod erat officii uestri, minime reportetis. hic ego uehementer ambigo, utrum istud ex religione descendat. nam si a domino peccata adeo prohibentur, ut ne paenitendi quidem copia post primam tribuatur, quem ad modum nos possumus ex religione contendere, ut nobis, qualecumque illud crimen fuerit, remittatur, quod utique, cum inpunitum uolumus, probamus? et si constat non minus auctorem quam probatorem teneri in omnibus, quae peccantur, certum est nos culpae societate uinciri, quotiens eum inpunitum esse cupimus, qui culpae tenetur obnoxius. tum praeterea accedit hoc, quod grauius est. nam omnia peccata uidentur ueniabiliora, cum is, qui reus est, correctionem promittit; uerum nunc, ut mores nostri sunt, et sceleris poenam cupiunt sibi homines relaxari et id, propter quod scelus admissum est, possidere. pro his quoque interueniendum putat sacerdotium uestrum, de quibus adeo futuri spes nulla est, ut etiam in praesenti eadem criminis ratio perseueret; nam qui tam peruicaciter tenet, propter quae crimen admisit, ostendit se, ubi licentia fuerit, similia peccaturum.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received the much-desired letter of Your Holiness through Boniface, a priest of the venerable law, whom I received and loved all the more because he had brought me what I longed for, the words of Your Holiness and news of your health, my lord justly venerable and singularly to be revered father. So he obtained without delay what he wished. But since an occasion has arisen, I do not want this very favor, small as it is, which I granted when urged, to remain without a reward. For I wish to receive a reward that benefits me without loss to the one who pays it, indeed that benefits me with glory to the one who pays it. You say that it is the duty of your priesthood to intercede for the guilty, and that you are offended if you do not obtain it, as though you did not carry off what belonged to your duty. Here I am very doubtful whether this comes from religion. For if sins are so forbidden by the Lord that not even the opportunity of repentance is granted after the first, how can we contend on religious grounds that a crime, whatever it may be, should be remitted for our sake, which, when we wish it unpunished, we certainly approve? And if it is agreed that in all sins the one who approves is held no less guilty than the one who commits, it is certain that we are bound in partnership in the guilt whenever we wish him to go unpunished who is liable to the guilt. Then there is something further, which is more serious. For all sins seem more pardonable when the guilty person promises amendment; but now, as our ways are, people both want the punishment of their crime remitted and to keep what they committed the crime to gain. Your priesthood thinks it should intercede even for those of whom there is so little hope for the future that even in the present the same motive of the crime persists; for he who so obstinately keeps what he committed the crime for shows that, when he is allowed, he will commit similar sins.

### Translation notes

- This letter is written to Augustine by Macedonius, vicar of Africa (ca. 414); the address is not printed in the staged text. Augustine replies in Letter 153.
- “Boniface, a priest of the venerable law” is a bishop (antistes) named Boniface. The rule of one penance only after baptism reflects the church discipline of the time (“repentance” here is penance).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 152.1 (CSEL 44:393–395; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-152-1).

## Letter 152.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-152-2
- Source: CSEL 44:395
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius asks Augustine to resolve his doubt, adding that he gladly grants pardons at good men's request, and asks for some of Augustine's writings.

### Latin text

Ob haec igitur consulo prudentiam tuam et me hoc ambiguo, quo laboro, absolui desidero; nec ob aliam causam consultum te putes. ceterum mihi hoc propositum est, ut intercessoribus praesertim talis meriti, qualis tu es, etiam gratias agam. pleraque enim, quae sponte facere uideri nolo, ne remissio seueritatis alios armet in crimina, opto bonis intercessoribus relaxare, ut, quod libens concedo, salua seueritate iudicii alterius merito uideatur indultum. incolumem sanctitatem tuam diuinitas aeterna tueatur aeuo largissimo, domine uenerabilis et uere colende pater. De scriptis sanctitatis tuae aliqua mihi promiseras et non accepi; quaeso, ut uel nunc mittas et ad hanc meam epistulam respondeas, ut, quia sanctitatem tuam interim uidere non datur, saltem sermonibus tuis pascar.

### English translation (Claude)

For these reasons, then, I consult your wisdom and wish to be freed from this doubt that troubles me; and do not think you are consulted for any other reason. For my part, my intention is even to give thanks to intercessors, especially of such merit as yours. For many things which I do not wish to seem to do of my own accord, lest a relaxation of severity arm others for crimes, I wish to remit at the request of good intercessors, so that what I grant gladly may seem, with the severity of judgment preserved, granted for the merit of another. May the eternal Godhead keep Your Holiness safe for a very long age, my lord venerable and truly to be revered father. You had promised me some of the writings of Your Holiness, and I have not received them; I ask you to send them at least now and to reply to this letter of mine, so that, since it is not granted me to see Your Holiness for the present, I may at least be fed by your words.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 152.2 (CSEL 44:395; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-152-2).

## Letter 153.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-1
- Source: CSEL 44:395–397
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Macedonius, imperial vicar of Africa, who asked why bishops intercede for condemned criminals when this seems to make them sharers in the guilt.

### Latin text

Negotiosissimum in re publica uirum et non suis sed aliorum utilitatibus attentissimum, qualem te esse et tibi gratulamur et rebus humanis, nec deserere debemus alloquio nec occupare prooemio. accipe itaque, quod per me uel nosse uoluisti uel, utrum ipse nossem, experiri. quod si paruum aut superfluum iudicares, nullo modo inter tam magnas tamque necessarias curas tuas curandum esse censeres. quaeris a me, cur officii sacerdotii nostri esse dicamus interuenire pro reis et, nisi obtineamus, offendi, quasi, quod erat officii nostri, minime reportemus. ubi uehementer te dicis ambigere, utrum istud ex religione descendat. deinde adiungens, qua ratione ita mouearis: nam si a domino peccata, inquis, adeo prohibentur, ut ne paenitendi quidem copia post primam tribuatur, quem ad modum nos possumus ex religione contendere, ut nobis, qualecumque illud crimen fuerit, remittatur? adhuc urgues grauius et dicis nos probare, quod uolumus inpunitum; et si constat non minus auctorem quam probatorem teneri in omnibus, quae peccantur, certum esse nos culpae societate uinciri, quotiens eum inpunitum esse uolumus, qui culpae tenetur obnoxius.

### English translation (Claude)

You are a man exceedingly busy in public affairs and most attentive to the interests not of yourself but of others; that you are such a man we congratulate both you and the human race. We ought neither to leave you without an answer nor to take up your time with a preface. Receive, then, what you wished either to learn through me or to test whether I knew it myself. If you had judged it small or superfluous, you would by no means have thought it worth attending to amid your many great and necessary cares. You ask me why we say that it belongs to the duty of our priesthood to intercede for the accused, and to be offended if we do not obtain our request, as though we were failing to carry off what belonged to our duty. On this point you say you are very much in doubt whether this comes down from religion. Then you add the reason why you are troubled: "For if sins are so prohibited by the Lord," you say, "that not even the opportunity of repentance is granted after the first, how can we contend on grounds of religion that a crime, whatever it may have been, should be remitted at our request?" You press still harder and say that we approve what we wish to go unpunished; and if it is agreed that in all wrongdoing the one who approves is held liable no less than the one who does it, it is certain that we are bound by a share in the guilt whenever we wish a man to go unpunished who is held answerable for guilt.

### Translation notes

- The addressee is Macedonius, vicar of Africa (ca. 413–414); his letter is Ep. 152 and his reply Ep. 154.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.1 (CSEL 44:395–397; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-1).

## Letter 153.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-2
- Source: CSEL 44:397–398
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine takes up Macedonius's own admission that sins seem more pardonable when the guilty promise amendment, as the ground of episcopal intercession.

### Latin text

His uerbis quem non terreas tuae lenitatis et humanitatis ignarum? unde nos, qui te nouimus et haec quaerendi gratia, non decernendi scripsisse minime dubitamus, aliis tuis uerbis ad ista citius respondemus. tamquam enim nos haesitare in hac quaestione nolueris, aut praeuidisti, quid dicturi essemus, aut admonuisti, quid dicere deberemus. et aisti: Tum praeterea accedit hoc, quod grauius est. nam omnia peccata uidentur ueniabiliora, cum is, qui reus est, correctionem promittit. antequam ergo discutiam, quid sit illud grauius, quod in epistula tua sequitur, hoc interim, quod dedisti, accipiam eoque utar ad molem hanc amoliendam, qua nostrae intercessiones posse reprimi uidebantur. ideo quippe, quantum facultas datur, pro peccatis omnibus intercedimus, quia omnia peccata uidentur ueniabiliora, cum is, qui reus est, correctionem promittit. haec tua est, haec et nostra sententia.

### English translation (Claude)

Whom would you not frighten with these words, if he did not know your gentleness and humanity? We, therefore, who know you and have no doubt that you wrote these things for the sake of inquiring, not of deciding, answer them the more quickly with other words of your own. For as though you did not want us to hesitate over this question, you either foresaw what we would say or reminded us of what we ought to say. You said: "Then besides there is this, which is weightier: for all sins seem more pardonable when the one who is guilty promises amendment." Before I discuss what that weightier matter is which follows in your letter, I shall meanwhile accept what you have granted and use it to remove this great obstacle by which our intercessions seemed liable to be checked. For this is precisely why we intercede, as far as opportunity allows, for all sins: because all sins seem more pardonable when the one who is guilty promises amendment. This is your opinion, and this is ours too.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.2 (CSEL 44:397–398; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-2).

## Letter 153.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-3
- Source: CSEL 44:398
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Bishops intercede not because they approve crimes but because they hate the vice and love the human being, who can amend only in this life.

### Latin text

Nullo modo ergo culpas, quas corrigi uolumus, adprobamus nec, quod perperam committitur, ideo uolumus inpunitum esse, quia placet; sed hominem miserantes, facinus autem seu flagitium detestantes, quanto magis nobis displicet uitium, tanto minus uolumus inemendatum interire uitiosum. facile est enim atque procliue malos odisse, quia mali sunt, rarum autem et pium eosdem ipsos diligere, quia homines sunt, ut in uno simul et culpam inprobes et naturam probes ac propterea culpam iustius oderis, quod ea foedatur natura, quam diligis. non est igitur iniquitatis sed potius humanitatis societate deuinctus, qui propterea est criminis persecutor, ut sit hominis liberator. morum porro corrigendorum nullus alius quam in hac uita locus; nam post hanc quisque id habebit, quod in hac sibimet conquisierit. ideo compellimur humani generis caritate interuenire pro reis, ne istam uitam sic finiant per supplicium, ut ea finita non possint finire supplicium.

### English translation (Claude)

In no way, then, do we approve the faults we wish to see corrected, nor do we wish what is wrongly done to go unpunished because it pleases us; but pitying the man while detesting the crime or the vice, the more the vice displeases us, the less we wish the vicious man to perish unamended. For it is easy and natural to hate the wicked because they are wicked, but rare and godly to love the same people because they are human beings, so that in one and the same person you at once disapprove the fault and approve the nature, and hate the fault the more justly because it defiles the nature which you love. He, therefore, is bound not by a fellowship of wickedness but rather of humanity who prosecutes the crime in order to set the man free. Moreover, there is no other place for amending conduct than in this life; for after it each will have what he has gained for himself in it. That is why we are compelled by love for the human race to intercede for the accused, so that they may not end this life by punishment in such a way that, once it is ended, they cannot end their punishment.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.3 (CSEL 44:398; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-3).

## Letter 153.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-4
- Source: CSEL 44:398–400
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God himself sends sun and rain on the wicked and waits patiently for their repentance, so intercession comes from religion.

### Latin text

Noli ergo dubitare hoc officium nostrum ex religione descendere, cum deus, apud quem nulla est iniquitas, cuius summa potestas est, qui non tantum, qualis quisque sit, uidet, uerum etiam, qualis futurus sit, praeuidet, qui solus potest in iudicando non labi, quia in cognoscendo non potest falli, faciat tamen, sicut euangelium loquitur, solem suum oriri super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos. cuius mirabilis bonitatis ut simus imitatores, dominus Christus exhortans: Diligite, inquit, inimicos uestros, benefacite eis, qui uos oderunt, et orate pro eis, qui uos persequuntur, ut sitis filii patris uestri, qui in caelis est, qui facit solem suum oriri super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos. hac indulgentia et lenitate diuina multos abuti ad perniciem suam quis nesciat? quos arguens apostolus et grauiter increpans dicit: Existimas autem, o homo omnis, qui iudicas eos, qui talia agunt, et facis ea, quoniam tu effugies iudicium dei? an diuitias benignitatis eius et patientiae et longanimitatis contemnis? ignoras, quoniam benignitas dei ad paenitentiam te adducit? secundum autem duritiam cordis tui et cor inpaenitens thesaurizas tibi iram in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii dei, qui reddet unicuique secundum opera eius. numquid, quoniam isti in sua nequitia perseuerant, ideo deus in sua patientia non perseuerat perpauca in hoc saeculo puniens, ne diuina prouidentia non esse credatur, et multa seruans ultimo examini, ut futurum iudicium commendetur?

### English translation (Claude)

Do not doubt, then, that this duty of ours comes down from religion, since God, with whom there is no iniquity, whose power is supreme, who sees not only what each person is but also foresees what he will be, who alone cannot err in judging because he cannot be deceived in knowing, nevertheless, as the gospel says, makes his sun rise on the good and the evil and sends rain on the just and the unjust. Exhorting us to imitate this wonderful goodness of his, the Lord Christ says: "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven, who makes his sun rise on the good and the evil and sends rain on the just and the unjust." Who does not know that many abuse this divine indulgence and gentleness to their own ruin? Reproving and sharply rebuking them, the apostle says: "Do you suppose, O man, whoever you are, who judge those who do such things and do them yourself, that you will escape the judgment of God? Or do you despise the riches of his kindness and patience and long-suffering? Do you not know that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But according to the hardness of your heart and your impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who will render to each according to his works." Because these people persevere in their wickedness, does God therefore not persevere in his patience, punishing very few in this world, lest divine providence be thought not to exist, and keeping many for the final examination, so that the judgment to come may be commended?

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: echo, medium confidence
- Matt 5:45: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:44: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 2:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 9:14 (echo); Matt 5:45; Matt 5:44–45 (cf. Luke 6:27–28); Rom 2:3–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.4 (CSEL 44:398–400; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-4).

## Letter 153.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-5
- Source: CSEL 44:400–401
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Loving and praying for the impious, as God commands, does not make one a partner in their impiety; the aim is their repentance.

### Latin text

Non, ut opinor, magister ille caelestis impietatem nos diligere praecipit, cum praecipit, ut nostros diligamus inimicos, benefaciamus eis, qui nos oderunt, oremus pro eis, qui nos persequuntur, cum procul dubio, si pie deum colimus, inimicos atque odiis aduersum nos acerrimis incitatos ac persecutores nisi impios habere non possumus. num igitur diligendi sunt impii? num impiis benefaciendum est? num pro impiis etiam orandum est? ita plane. qui enim hoc praecipit, deus est; nec tamen nos hoc pacto societati adiungit impiorum, quibus et ipse parcendo et uitam salutemque largiendo non utique sociatur. consilium quippe eius, quantum homini pio nosse donatum est, exponit apostolus dicens: Ignoras, quia patientia dei ad paenitentiam te adducit? ad hanc uolumus adduci, pro quibus interuenimus, non eorum peccatis uel parcimus uel fauemus.

### English translation (Claude)

The heavenly Teacher does not, I think, command us to love impiety when he commands us to love our enemies, to do good to those who hate us, to pray for those who persecute us, since without doubt, if we worship God piously, we can have no enemies, inflamed against us with the bitterest hatred, and no persecutors except the impious. Are the impious, then, to be loved? Is good to be done to the impious? Must we even pray for the impious? Plainly, yes. For the one who commands this is God; and yet he does not by this means join us to the fellowship of the impious, with whom he himself is certainly not associated by sparing them and lavishing life and health on them. His purpose, so far as it has been given a godly man to know it, is set out by the apostle when he says: "Do you not know that the patience of God leads you to repentance?" It is to this repentance that we wish those for whom we intercede to be led; we neither spare nor favor their sins.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 5:44; Rom 2:4 (Augustine here reads patientia, "patience", for benignitas).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.5 (CSEL 44:400–401; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-5).

## Letter 153.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-6
- Source: CSEL 44:401
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those whom bishops rescue from the sentence are still barred from the altar to do penance, and if God is patient even with the impenitent, bishops should be merciful to those who promise amendment.

### Latin text

Nam quosdam, quorum crimina manifesta sunt, a uestra seueritate liberatos a societate tamen remouemus altaris, ut paenitendo placare possint, quem peccando contempserant, seque ipsos puniendo. nam nihil aliud agit, quem ueraciter paenitet, nisi ut id, quod male fecerit, inpunitum esse non sinat. eo quippe modo sibi non parcenti ille parcit, cuius altum iustumque iudicium nullus contemptor euadit. quod si iniquis et scelestis ille parcendo eisque uitam salutemque largiendo etiam plerisque eorum, quos nouit non acturos paenitentiam, tamen exhibet patientiam, quanto magis nos in eos, qui correctionem promittunt et, utrum faciant, quod promittunt, incerti sumus, misericordes esse debemus, ut rigorem uestrum pro eis intercedendo flectamus, pro quibus et deum, quem nihil de moribus eorum etiam futuris latet, non tamen inpudenter, quia hoc ipse praecepit, oramus!

### English translation (Claude)

For some whose crimes are manifest, once freed from your severity, we nevertheless remove from the fellowship of the altar, so that by repenting and punishing themselves they may appease him whom they had despised by sinning. For the one who truly repents does nothing else than refuse to let what he has done wrong go unpunished. In this way he whose deep and just judgment no despiser escapes spares the one who does not spare himself. But if God, by sparing the unjust and the wicked and lavishing life and health on them, shows patience even to many of them whom he knows will not repent, how much more ought we to be merciful toward those who promise amendment, though we are uncertain whether they will do what they promise, so that we bend your rigor by interceding for them, for whom we also pray to God, from whom nothing of their conduct, even in the future, is hidden; and we do so not shamelessly, since he himself has commanded it!

### Translation notes

- "Remove from the fellowship of the altar": exclusion from communion in the church's public penance.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.6 (CSEL 44:401; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-6).

## Letter 153.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-7
- Source: CSEL 44:401–404
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even those who relapse after the church's once-only public penance are not beyond God's patience, and their repentance still profits them for the life to come.

### Latin text

In tantum autem hominum iniquitas aliquando progreditur, ut etiam post actam paenitentiam, post altaris reconciliationem uel similia uel grauiora committant; et tamen deus facit etiam super tales oriri solem suum nec minus tribuit, quam antea tribuebat, largissima munera uitae ac salutis. et quamuis eis in ecclesia locus ille paenitentiae non concedatur, deus tamen super eos suae patientiae non obliuiscitur. ex quorum numero si quis nobis dicat: Aut date mihi eundem iterum paenitendi locum aut desperatum me pronuntiate, ut faciam, quicquid libuerit, quantum meis opibus adiuuor et humanis legibus non prohibeor, in scortis omnique luxuria damnabili quidem apud deum sed apud homines plerosque etiam laudabili, aut si me ab hac nequitia reuocatis, dicite, utrum mihi aliquid prosit ad uitam futuram, si in ista uita inlecebrosissimae uoluptatis blandimenta contempsero, si libidinum incitamenta frenauero. si ad castigandum corpus meum multa mihi etiam licita et concessa subtraxero, si me paenitendo uehementius quam prius excruciauero, si miserabilius ingemuero, si fleuero uberius, si uixero melius, si pauperes sustentauero largius, si caritate, quae cooperit multitudinem peccatorum, flagrauero ardentius, quis nostrum ita desipit, ut huic homini dicat: Nihil tibi ista in posterum proderunt; uade, saltem uitae huius suauitate perfruere? auerterit deus tam immanem sacrilegamque dementiam! quamuis ergo caute salubriterque prouisum sit, ut locus illius humillimae paenitentiae semel in ecclesia concedatur, ne medicina uilis minus utilis esset aegrotis, quae tanto magis salubris erit, quanto minus contemptibilis fuerit, quis tamen audeat deo dicere: Quare huic homini, qui post primam paenitentiam rursus se laqueis iniquitatis obstringit, adhuc iterum parcis? quis audeat dicere erga istos non agi, quod apostolus ait: Ignoras, quia patientia dei ad paenitentiam te adducit? aut istis exceptis esse definitum, quod scriptum est: Beati omnes, qui confidunt in eum, aut ad istos non pertinere, quod dicitur: Viriliter agite et confortetur cor uestrum, omnes qui speratis in domino?

### English translation (Claude)

Human wickedness, however, sometimes goes so far that even after penance has been performed, after reconciliation at the altar, people commit similar or worse sins; and yet God makes his sun rise even on such people and grants them no less than he granted before the most generous gifts of life and health. And although that place of penance is not granted them in the church, God nevertheless does not forget his patience toward them. If one of their number should say to us: "Either give me that same place of penance again, or declare me hopeless, so that I may do whatever I please, as far as my wealth helps me and human laws do not forbid me, among prostitutes and in every kind of luxury, damnable indeed before God but even praised by most men; or if you call me back from this wickedness, tell me whether it will profit me anything for the life to come if in this life I despise the allurements of most seductive pleasure, if I bridle the incitements of lust, if to chastise my body I deny myself many things that are even lawful and permitted, if I torment myself in repentance more vehemently than before, if I groan more piteously, weep more abundantly, live better, support the poor more generously, burn more ardently with the love that covers a multitude of sins" — which of us is so foolish as to say to this man: "None of these things will profit you hereafter; go, at least enjoy the sweetness of this life"? God forbid such monstrous and sacrilegious madness! Although, then, it has been prudently and wholesomely provided that the place of that most humble penance is granted only once in the church, lest the medicine, being cheap, be less useful to the sick (for it will be the more wholesome the less contemptible it is), yet who would dare to say to God: "Why do you spare this man yet again, who after his first penance binds himself once more in the snares of iniquity?" Who would dare to say that what the apostle says is not done toward such people: "Do you not know that the patience of God leads you to repentance?" Or that they have been specifically excepted from what is written: "Blessed are all who trust in him," or that what is said does not apply to them: "Act manfully, and let your heart be strengthened, all you who hope in the Lord"?

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:45: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 31:24 (30:25 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Public penance (paenitentia) was granted only once in the church; Augustine distinguishes this discipline from God's continuing patience. Scripture: Matt 5:45; 1 Pet 4:8; Rom 2:4; Ps 2:12; Ps 31:24 (30:25 Vulgate/LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.7 (CSEL 44:401–404; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-7).

## Letter 153.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-8
- Source: CSEL 44:404–405
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since all are sinners, even judges, who rightly avenge crimes as ministers of the law, should remember their own need of mercy and may act mercifully.

### Latin text

Cum igitur super peccatores tanta sit patientia, tanta misericordia dei, ut in hac temporali uita moribus emendatis non damnentur in aeternum, qui nullius, quae sibi praebeatur, expectat misericordiam, quoniam nemo est illo beatior, nemo potentior, nemo iustior, quales nos esse oportet homines erga homines, qui hanc uitam nostram quantacumque laude cumulemus, eam sine peccato esse non dicimus, quia, si dixerimus nos ipsos, sicut scriptum est, decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est! proinde licet accusatoris alia persona sit, alia defensoris, alia intercessoris, alia iudicis, de quorum propriis officiis nimis longum est et non necessarium hoc sermone disserere, sic tamen etiam ipsos criminum ultores atque in hoc officio non ira propria concitatos sed legum ministros nec suarum sed alienarum iniuriarum examinatarum uindices, quales iudices esse debent, terruit censura diuina, ut cogitarent sibi propter sua peccata dei misericordiam necessariam nec putarent ad culpam sui officii pertinere, si quid erga eos misericorditer agerent, quorum uitae necisque haberent legitimam potestatem.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, God's patience and mercy toward sinners are so great that those who amend their conduct in this temporal life are not condemned for eternity, although he expects mercy from no one, since no one is happier, no one more powerful, no one more just than he, what ought we to be as men toward men, who, however much praise we heap upon this life of ours, do not say that it is without sin, because, if we say so, as it is written, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us? Accordingly, although the role of accuser is one thing, that of defender another, that of intercessor another, and that of judge another (to discuss their proper duties in this letter would be too long and unnecessary), yet divine censure has so frightened even those who avenge crimes, and who in this office are moved not by their own anger but are ministers of the laws, avengers not of their own injuries but of others' injuries duly examined, as judges ought to be, that they should reflect that they need God's mercy because of their own sins, and should not think it a fault in their office if they act mercifully toward those over whose life and death they hold lawful power.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 1:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 John 1:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.8 (CSEL 44:404–405; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-8).

## Letter 153.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-9
- Source: CSEL 44:405–406
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's word to the accusers of the adulteress and Joseph's resolve not to expose Mary show that sparing the guilty is not approval of the crime.

### Latin text

Nam cum ad dominum Christum Iudaei adduxissent mulierem in adulterio deprehensam eumque temptantes dicerent quod iussa esset lege lapidari, ac deinde quaererent, quid de illa ipse praeciperet, respondit eis: Qui sine peccato est uestrum, prior in illam lapidem iaciat. ita nec legem inprobauit, quae huius modi reas iussit occidi, et illos terrendo ad misericordiam reuocauit, quorum iudicio haec posset occidi. puto, quod hac sententia domini audita, si praesens fuit etiam maritus ipse, qui uiolatam sui tori fidem uindicari postulabat, exterritus animum ad uoluntatem parcendi ab ulciscendi cupiditate deflexit. nam quo modo est admonitus accusator, ne suas persequeretur iniurias, quando ipsi iudices ita sunt a uindicando prohibiti, qui in adultera punienda non priuato dolori compellebantur seruire sed legi! unde Ioseph, cui uirgo Maria, domini mater, fuerat desponsata, cum eam comperisset esse praegnantem, cui se nouerat non esse commixtum, et ob hoc nihil aliud quam adulteram credidisset, puniri eam tamen noluit nec approbator flagitii fuit. nam haec uoluntas eius etiam iustitiae deputatur; ita quippe de illo scriptum est: Et cum esset homo iustus et nollet eam diuulgare, statuit eam occulte dimittere. haec eo cogitante apparuit illi angelus, qui doceret esse numinis, quod ille putauerat criminis.

### English translation (Claude)

For when the Jews had brought to the Lord Christ a woman caught in adultery, and, testing him, said that the law commanded her to be stoned, and then asked what he himself prescribed concerning her, he answered them: "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her." Thus he neither disapproved the law, which commanded that women guilty of this be put to death, and by terrifying them he recalled to mercy those by whose sentence she could be put to death. I think that when this saying of the Lord was heard, if the husband himself was also present, who was demanding vengeance for the violated faith of his marriage bed, he was terrified and turned his mind from the desire for revenge to the will to spare. For how was the accuser admonished not to pursue his own injuries, when the judges themselves, who in punishing an adulteress were compelled to serve not private grief but the law, were thus restrained from avenging! Hence Joseph, to whom the virgin Mary, the mother of the Lord, had been betrothed, when he found her pregnant, though he knew he had not had intercourse with her, and for this reason believed nothing else than that she was an adulteress, nevertheless did not wish her to be punished, yet was not an approver of the crime. For this will of his is even counted as righteousness, for so it is written of him: "And since he was a just man and did not wish to expose her, he resolved to put her away secretly." While he was thinking of this, an angel appeared to him to teach him that what he had thought a crime was the work of divine power.

### Scripture references

- John 8:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 8:7: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 20:10: allusion, medium confidence
- Deut 22:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 1:18: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 1:19: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 1:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 8:3–7; Lev 20:10 and Deut 22:22 (the law cited); Matt 1:18–20. Augustine speculates that the husband may have been present; the gospel does not say so.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.9 (CSEL 44:405–406; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-9).

## Letter 153.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-10
- Source: CSEL 44:406–408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Intercession differs from defense; Macedonius himself once interceded with the bishop of Carthage for a cleric, and a bishop has stronger reason to intercede against the sword.

### Latin text

Si ergo cogitata infirmitate communi et accusatorius dolor et iudiciarius rigor frangitur, quod tandem censes pro reis esse debere uel defensoris uel intercessoris officium, quando quidem et uos uiri boni, qui nunc iudices estis et in foro aliquando uersati causas hominum suscepistis, scitis, quam libentius defendere quam accusare soleretis? et tamen defensor ab intercessore plurimum distat; nam ille diluendis uel obtegendis criminibus operam maxime inpendit, intercessor autem etiam cum de culpa constat, pro poena remouenda uel temperanda curam gerit. hoc sunt apud deum pro peccatoribus iusti, hoc pro se ipsi peccantes inuicem ut faciant, admonentur; nam scriptum est: Confitemini inuicem peccata uestra et orate pro uobis. has sibi partes humanitatis, ubi potest, omnis homo apud hominem uindicat. nam quod ipse quisque domi suae puniret admissum, in alterius domo uult inpunitum. siue enim adhibeatur apud amicum siue ille cuiquam, in quem potestas ulciscendi est, se praesente suscenseat siue irascenti fortuito superueniat, non iustissimus sed inhumanissimus iudicatur, si non interueniat. scio ego te ipsum cum aliis amicis tuis in ecclesia Carthaginensi intercessisse pro clerico, cui merito suscensebat episcopus, et utique nullum ibi discrimen sanguinis sed incruenta disciplina timebatur; nec cum id, quod etiam uobis displicebat, inultum esse uelletis, tamquam delicti approbatores uos iudicabamus, sed tamquam humanissimos intercessores audiebamus. si ergo uobis fas est ecclesiasticam correptionem intercedendo mitigare, quo modo episcopus uestro gladio debet intercedere, cum illa exeratur, ut, in quem exeritur, bene uiuat, iste, ne uiuat!

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, when the common weakness is considered, both the accuser's indignation and the judge's rigor are broken, what do you think the duty of a defender or an intercessor ought to be on behalf of the accused, seeing that you good men, who are now judges and once practiced in the forum and took up people's cases, know how much more gladly you used to defend than to accuse? And yet a defender differs greatly from an intercessor: the former spends his effort chiefly in refuting or concealing the charges, whereas the intercessor, even when the guilt is established, takes care to have the penalty removed or lessened. This is what the righteous do before God for sinners; this sinners are admonished to do for one another, for it is written: "Confess your sins to one another and pray for one another." Every human being claims these offices of humanity for himself before another wherever he can. For what each would punish if it were committed in his own house, he wants left unpunished in another's house. Whether he is called in by a friend, or the friend grows angry in his presence with someone over whom he has the power of punishment, or he happens upon him in his anger, he is judged not most just but most inhuman if he does not intervene. I know that you yourself, with other friends of yours, interceded in the church of Carthage for a cleric with whom the bishop was justly angry; and certainly no danger of bloodshed was feared there, only a bloodless discipline. Yet when you wished what displeased even you to go unpunished, we did not judge you approvers of the offense but listened to you as most humane intercessors. If, then, it is right for you to soften the correction of the church by interceding, how much more ought a bishop to intercede against your sword, since the one is drawn so that the person against whom it is drawn may live well, the other so that he may not live!

### Scripture references

- Jas 5:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Jas 5:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.10 (CSEL 44:406–408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-10).

## Letter 153.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-11
- Source: CSEL 44:408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ interceded for the adulteress by frightening her accusers; Christians should yield to the saying to which even his enemies yielded, and Macedonius should be gentle.

### Latin text

Postremo ipse dominus apud homines intercessit, ne lapidaretur adultera, et eo modo nobis intercessionis commendauit officium, nisi quia ille terrendo fecit, quod nos petendo. ille enim dominus, nos serui sumus. uerum tamen ille sic terruit, ut omnes timere debeamus. quis enim est nostrum sine peccato? quod cum illis dixisset, a quibus ei offerebatur punienda peccatrix, ut, qui sciret se esse sine peccato, prior in illam lapidem mitteret, cecidit saeuitia tremente conscientia; tunc enim iam ex illa congregatione dilapsi solam misericordi miseram reliquerunt. cedat huic sententiae pietas Christianorum, cui cessit impietas Iudaeorum; cedat humilitas obsequentium, cui cessit superbia persequentium; cedat confessio fidelis, cui cessit simulatio temptatoris. malis parce, uir bone; quanto melior, tanto esto mitior; quanto fis celsior potestate, tanto humilior fiere pietate.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, the Lord himself interceded with men so that the adulteress would not be stoned, and in this way commended to us the duty of intercession, except that he did by terrifying what we do by asking. For he is the Lord; we are servants. Yet he so terrified them that all of us ought to fear. For which of us is without sin? When he had said to those who were bringing the sinful woman to him to be punished that whoever knew himself to be without sin should be the first to throw a stone at her, their savagery fell as their conscience trembled; for then, slipping away from that gathering, they left the wretched woman alone with the Merciful One. Let the piety of Christians yield to this saying, to which the impiety of the Jews yielded; let the humility of the obedient yield to it, to which the pride of persecutors yielded; let the confession of the faithful yield to it, to which the pretense of the tempter yielded. Spare the wicked, good sir; the better you are, the gentler be; the higher you are in power, the humbler become in piety.

### Scripture references

- John 8:7: allusion, high confidence
- John 8:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 8:7–9. Augustine's contrast ("miseram ... misericordi") is a wordplay on wretchedness and mercy. The phrase "the impiety of the Jews" refers to the accusers in the gospel scene and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.11 (CSEL 44:408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/149-24/#p-153-11).

## Letter 153.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-12
- Source: CSEL 44:408–409
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God alone is good by nature; human beings are good by sharing in his goodness through his Spirit, and are called good when their good deeds prevail.

### Latin text

Ego quidem intuens mores tuos appellaui te uirum bonum. sed tu intuens uerba Christi dic tibi ipse: Nemo bonus nisi unus deus. quod cum uerum sit — hoc enim ueritas dixit —, nec ego tamen illud existimari debeo fallaci assentatione dixisse et dominicis uerbis quasi contrarius extitisse, ut, cum ille dicat: Nemo bonus nisi unus deus, ego te appellauerim uirum bonum; non enim et ipse dominus contraria sibi locutus est, ubi ait: Bonus homo de bono thesauro cordis sui profert bona. deus ergo singulariter bonus est et hoc amittere non potest; nullius enim boni participatione bonus est, quoniam bonum, quo bonus est, ipse sibi est, homo autem, cum bonus est, ab illo bonus est, quod a se ipso esse non potest. illius enim spiritu boni fiunt, quicumque fiunt, cuius capax creata est nostra natura per propriam uoluntatem. pertinet ergo ad nos, ut boni simus, accipere et habere, quod dat, qui de suo bonus est, quo quisque neglecto de suo malus est. proinde in quantum homo recte agit, id est scienter et amanter et pie bonum operatur, in tantum bonus est; in quantum autem peccat, id est a ueritate et caritate et pietate deuiat, in tantum malus est. quis autem est in hac uita sine aliquo peccato? sed eum dicimus bonum, cuius praeualent bona, eumque optimum, qui peccat minimum.

### English translation (Claude)

I, looking at your conduct, called you a good man. But you, looking at the words of Christ, say to yourself: "No one is good but God alone." Though this is true (for the Truth said it), I ought not therefore to be thought to have said that out of deceitful flattery and to have set myself against the Lord's words, calling you a good man when he says: "No one is good but God alone." For the Lord did not contradict himself when he said: "A good man brings good things out of the good treasure of his heart." God, then, is good in a unique way and cannot lose this; for he is good by participation in no other good, since the good by which he is good is himself; but a man, when he is good, is good from him, since he cannot be so from himself. For whoever become good become so by his Spirit, whom our nature was created capable of receiving through its own will. It belongs to us, then, in order to be good, to receive and to keep what he gives who is good of himself; neglecting him, each is evil of himself. Accordingly, insofar as a man acts rightly, that is, does good knowingly, lovingly, and piously, so far he is good; but insofar as he sins, that is, strays from truth, love, and piety, so far he is evil. Yet who in this life is without any sin? But we call him good whose good deeds prevail, and him best who sins least.

### Scripture references

- Mark 10:18: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:19: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:45: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:35: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Mark 10:18 (Luke 18:19); Luke 6:45 (cf. Matt 12:35).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.12 (CSEL 44:408–409; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-12).

## Letter 153.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-13
- Source: CSEL 44:409–411
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Lord's Prayer, prayed by the baptized, shows that God's adopted sons are good by grace yet still sinners needing daily forgiveness.

### Latin text

Idcirco ipse dominus quos dicit bonos propter participationem gratiae diuinae, eosdem etiam malos dicit propter uitia infirmitatis humanae, donec totum, quo constamus, ab omni uitiositate sanatum transeat in eam uitam, ubi nihil omnino peccabitur. nam utique bonos docebat orare, non malos, quibus praecepit, ut dicerent: Pater noster, qui es in caelis; ex hoc enim boni, quo filii dei non natura geniti sed gratia facti tamquam hi, quibus recipientibus eum dedit potestatem filios dei fieri. quae generatio spiritalis more scripturarum etiam adoptio nominatur, ut distinguatur ab illa generatione dei de deo, coaeterni de aeterno, unde scriptum est: Generationem eius quis enarrabit? cum ergo bonos esse monstrauerit, quos uoluit deo ueraciter dicere: Pater noster, qui es in caelis, praecepit tamen, ut in eadem oratione inter cetera dicerent: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. quae debita esse peccata quamuis manifestum sit, postea tamen manifestius declarauit dicens: Si enim dimiseritis peccata hominibus, dimittet uobis et pater uester peccata uestra. hanc orationem baptizati orant nec est prorsus praeteritorum aliquid peccatorum, quod non baptizatis in sancta ecclesia dimittatur. sed postea uiuendo in hac fragilitate mortali nisi contraherent, quod dimittendum esset, non ueraciter dicerent: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. boni ergo, in quantum filii dei sunt, in quantum autem peccat, quod sua non mendaci confessione testantur, utique mali sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason the Lord himself calls the same people good because of their participation in divine grace and also evil because of the faults of human weakness, until the whole of which we consist, healed of all viciousness, passes into that life where there will be no sin at all. For certainly it was the good, not the evil, whom he was teaching to pray when he commanded them to say: "Our Father, who are in heaven"; for they are good in this, that they are sons of God, not begotten by nature but made so by grace, as those to whom, when they received him, he gave power to become sons of God. This spiritual generation is also called adoption in the usage of the Scriptures, to distinguish it from that generation of God from God, of the coeternal from the eternal, of which it is written: "Who shall declare his generation?" Since, then, he showed that those were good whom he wished to say truthfully to God, "Our Father, who are in heaven," he nevertheless commanded them to say among other things in the same prayer: "Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors." Though it is clear that these debts are sins, he afterward declared it still more clearly, saying: "For if you forgive men their sins, your Father will also forgive you your sins." The baptized pray this prayer, and there is absolutely nothing of past sins that is not forgiven to the baptized in the holy church. But if afterward, living in this mortal frailty, they did not contract something needing forgiveness, they would not truly say: "Forgive us our debts." The good, then, insofar as they are sons of God, but insofar as they sin, which they attest by their truthful confession, are certainly evil.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:15: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 4:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Isa 53:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 6:9; John 1:12; Rom 8:15 and Gal 4:5 (adoption); Isa 53:8; Matt 6:12; Matt 6:14. The last sentence is elliptical in the Latin (a verb such as "are good" is understood after "sons of God").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.13 (CSEL 44:409–411; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-13).

## Letter 153.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-14
- Source: CSEL 44:411–412
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ called his disciples evil yet children of God; as Seneca says, to hate the wicked is to hate everyone, so the wicked must be loved in order to be healed.

### Latin text

Nisi forte quis dicat alia bonorum alia malorum esse peccata, quod non usque quaque inprobabiliter dicitur. uerum tamen dominus Iesus sine ulla ambiguitate malos appellauit eosdem ipsos, quorum patrem dicebat deum. nam in eodem sermone, ubi illam docet orationem, alio loco exhortans ad precandum deum ait: Petite et accipietis, quaerite et inuenietis, pulsate et aperietur uobis; omnis enim, qui petit, accipit et, qui quaerit, inuenit et pulsanti aperietur; et paulo post: Si ergo uos, inquit, cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis uestris, quanto magis pater uester, qui in caelis est, dabit bona petentibus se! num igitur deus pater malorum est? absit. quo modo ergo dicitur pater uester caelestis, quibus dicitur cum sitis mali, nisi quia utrumque ueritas monstrat, quid simus dei bono, quid humano uitio, hoc commendans, illud emendans? merito ait Seneca, qui temporibus apostolorum fuit, cuius etiam quaedam ad Paulum apostolum leguntur epistulae: 'Omnes odit, qui malos odit. et tamen ideo sunt diligendi mali, ut non sint mali, quem ad modum, non ut permaneant. sed ut sanentur, diliguntur aegroti.

### English translation (Claude)

Unless perhaps someone says that the sins of the good are one thing and those of the evil another, which is said not altogether implausibly. Yet the Lord Jesus without any ambiguity called the very same people evil whose Father he said God was. For in the same sermon in which he teaches that prayer, exhorting them in another place to pray to God, he says: "Ask and you will receive, seek and you will find, knock and it will be opened to you; for everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened"; and a little later: "If you, then," he says, "though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him!" Is God, then, the Father of the evil? Far from it. How, then, is "your heavenly Father" said to those to whom it is said "though you are evil," except that the Truth shows both, what we are by God's goodness and what by human fault, commending the one and amending the other? Rightly does Seneca say, who lived in the times of the apostles and some of whose letters to the apostle Paul are also read: "He hates all, who hates the wicked." And yet the wicked are to be loved so that they may not be wicked, just as the sick are loved not that they may remain sick but that they may be healed.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:11: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 11:13: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Seneca, De ira 2.10 (Seneca): quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 7:7–8, 11 (Luke 11:9–13). Seneca, De ira 2.10 (cf. 2.10.6); the letters of Seneca to Paul mentioned are the apocryphal correspondence, which has no entry in the site's list.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.14 (CSEL 44:411–412; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-14).

## Letter 153.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-15
- Source: CSEL 44:412–413
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Sins after baptism are expiated by works of mercy; Christ, sinless, did not condemn the adulteress yet bade her sin no more, so intercession is not complicity.

### Latin text

Quicquid autem post eam, quae fit in baptismo, abolitionem omnium peccatorum in hac uita manendo peccamus, etiam si non tale sit, quod a diuinis remoueri compellat altaribus, non dolore sterili sed misericordiae sacrificiis expiatur. quod ergo agimus, ut faciatis intercedentibus nobis, deo uos noueritis offerre pro nobis. indigetis enim misericordia, quam praebetis, et uidete, quis dixerit: Dimittite et dimittetur uobis, date et dabitur uobis. quamquam etiam si ita uiueremus, ut non esset, quare diceremus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, quanto nequitia purior animus esset, tanto clementia plenior esse deberet, ut, si non compungeremur sententia domini dicentis: Qui uestrum est sine peccato, prior in illam lapidem iaciat, ipsius, qui hoc dixit, sectaremur exemplum, qui cum esset utique sine peccato, ait mulieri, quam perterriti illi reliquerunt: Nec ego te damnabo; uade, iam deinceps noli peccare. potuit enim metuere flagitiosa mulier. ne forte illis discedentibus, qui sua peccata cogitauerant, ut peccato parcerent alieno, illam iustissime iam ipse damnaret. qui erat sine peccato. at ille non conscientia pauidus sed plenus clementia, cum illa respondisset a nemine se fuisse damnatam: Nec ego te, inquit, damnabo, tamquam diceret: Si malitia tibi parcere potuit, quid metuis innocentiam? et ne delictorum non donator sed approbator uideretur: Vade, ait, deinceps iam noli peccare, ut se homini pepercisse, non hominis culpam sibi placuisse monstraret. iam uides igitur de religione descendere nec nos societate criminum obstringi, quod intercedimus plerumque etiam pro sceleratis etsi non scelerati tamen pro peccatoribus peccatores et — quod ueraciter potius quam iniuriose dictum accipias - puto quod apud peccatores.

### English translation (Claude)

Whatever sins we commit while remaining in this life after the abolition of all sins which takes place in baptism, even if it is not such as compels removal from the divine altars, is expiated not by sterile grief but by sacrifices of mercy. What we try to bring you to do when we intercede, then, know that you are offering to God for us. For you need the mercy that you show; and see who it was that said: "Forgive and you will be forgiven; give and it will be given to you." And even if we lived in such a way that there was no reason for us to say, "Forgive us our debts," the purer our mind was of wickedness, the fuller of clemency it ought to be, so that, if we were not pricked by the saying of the Lord, "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her," we would follow the example of the very one who said this, who, though he was certainly without sin, said to the woman whom those men had left in terror: "Neither will I condemn you; go, from now on sin no more." For the sinful woman might have feared that, when those had gone away who had thought of their own sins so as to spare another's sin, he himself, who was without sin, would now condemn her most justly. But he, not fearful in conscience but full of clemency, when she answered that she had been condemned by no one, said: "Neither will I condemn you," as if to say: "If malice could spare you, why do you fear innocence?" And lest he should seem not the forgiver but the approver of offenses, he said: "Go, from now on sin no more," to show that he had spared the human being, not that the human being's fault had pleased him. You see now, therefore, that it comes down from religion, and that we are not bound by a share in crimes when we often intercede even for criminals, not criminals ourselves yet sinners for sinners, and (take this as said truthfully rather than insultingly) I think before sinners too.

### Scripture references

- Luke 6:37: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:38: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 8:7: quotation, high confidence
- John 8:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 6:37–38; Matt 6:12; John 8:7, 10–11. "Clemency" reads clementia for the digital text's dementia (corrected).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.15 (CSEL 44:412–413; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-15).

## Letter 153.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-16
- Source: CSEL 44:413–415
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The power of rulers, judges, and executioners has its proper use in restraining the wicked, and episcopal intercession presupposes rather than opposes it.

### Latin text

Nec ideo sane frustra instituta sunt potestas regis, ius gladii cognitoris, ungulae carnificis, arma militis, disciplina dominantis, seueritas etiam boni patris. habent ista omnia modos suos, causas, rationes, utilitates. haec cum timentur, et cohercentur mali et quietius inter malos uiuunt boni, non quia boni pronuntiandi sunt, qui talia metuendo non peccant — non enim bonus est quispiam timore poenae sed amore iustitiae —, uerum tamen non inutiliter etiam metu legum humana cohercetur audacia. ut et tuta sit inter inprobos innocentia et in ipsis inprobis, dum formidato supplicio frenatur facultas. inuocato deo sanetur uoluntas. sed huic ordinationi rerum humanarum contrariae non sunt intercessiones episcoporum: immo uero nec causa nec locus intercedendi ullus esset, si ista non essent. tanto enim sunt intercedentium et parcentium beneficia gratiora, quanto peccantium iustiora supplicia. nec ob aliud, quantum sapio, in ueteri testamento antiquorum temporibus prophetarum seuerior legis uindicta feruebat, nisi ut ostenderetur recte iniquis poenas constitutas. ut, quod eis parcere noui testamenti indulgentia commonemur, aut remedium sit salutis, quo peccatis parcatur et nostris, aut commendatio mansuetudinis, ut per eos, qui parcunt. ueritas praedicata non tantum timeatur, uerum etiam diligatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Not that the power of the king, the right of the sword of the judge, the hooks of the executioner, the weapons of the soldier, the discipline of the master, and even the severity of a good father were instituted in vain. All these have their measures, causes, reasons, and uses. When these are feared, the wicked are held in check and the good live more quietly among the wicked; not that those who refrain from sin through fear of such things are to be declared good (for no one is good through fear of punishment but through love of justice), but human boldness is not uselessly held in check even by fear of the laws, so that innocence may be safe among the wicked, and in the wicked themselves, while their capacity is bridled by dread of punishment, the will may be healed when God is called upon. But the intercessions of bishops are not contrary to this ordering of human affairs; on the contrary, there would be no cause or occasion for interceding if these things did not exist. For the kindnesses of those who intercede and spare are the more welcome, the more just are the punishments of sinners. Nor, as far as I understand, did the vengeance of the law burn more severely in the Old Testament in the times of the ancient prophets for any other reason than to show that penalties were rightly appointed for the wicked, so that our being admonished by the indulgence of the New Testament to spare them may be either a remedy for salvation, by which our own sins also may be spared, or a commendation of gentleness, so that through those who spare, the truth preached may be not only feared but also loved.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.16 (CSEL 44:413–415; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-16).

## Letter 153.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-17
- Source: CSEL 44:415–416
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There is a merciful punishment and a cruel leniency; killing differs in guilt by intention, and one is not guilty of every death one occasions.

### Latin text

Plurimum autem interest, quo animo quisque parcat. sicut enim est aliquando misericordia puniens, ita et crudelitas parcens. nam, ut exempli gratia manifestum aliquid ponam, quis non crudelem uerius dixerit eum, qui puero pepercerit uolenti obstinatissime de serpentibus ludere? quis autem non misericordem, qui talia prohibens contemptorem uerborum etiam uerberibus emendauerit? et ideo non usque ad mortem protendenda est disciplina, ut sit, cui prodesse possit. quamquam etiam cum homo ab homine occiditur, multum distet, utrum fiat nocendi cupiditate uel iniuste aliquid auferendi, sicut fit ab inimico, sicut a latrone, an ulciscendi uel oboediendi ordine, sicut a iudice, sicut a carnifice, an euadendi uel subueniendi necessitate, sicut interimitur latro a uiatore, hostis a milite. et aliquando, qui causa mortis fuit, potius in culpa est quam ille, qui occidit, uelut si quisquam decipiat fideiussorem suum atque ille pro isto supplicium legitimum luat. nec tamen omnis, qui causa alienae mortis est, reus est. quid, si enim quisquam stuprum petat seseque, si non impetrarit, interimat? quid, si filius timens patris pia uerbera praecipitio pereat? quid, si alius homine liberato uel ne alius liberetur sibi ipse mortem inferat? num propter istas alienarum mortium causas aut sceleri consentiendum est aut uindicta peccati, quae non fit nocendi sed corrigendi studio, etiam paterna tollenda aut opera misericordiae cohibenda sunt? haec cum accidunt, debemus eis humanum dolorem, non propter illa, ne accidant, recte factorum reprimimus uoluntatem.

### English translation (Claude)

It makes a very great difference, however, with what intention each person spares. For just as there is sometimes a mercy that punishes, so there is also a cruelty that spares. To give an obvious example, who would not more truly call cruel the man who spared a boy who was determined, most obstinately, to play with snakes? And who would not call merciful the one who, forbidding such things, corrected with blows one who despised his words? And for this reason discipline must not be extended as far as death, so that there may be someone whom it can benefit. Even when a man is killed by a man, it makes a great difference whether it is done from a desire to harm or to take something away unjustly, as by an enemy or a robber; or in the order of punishment or obedience, as by a judge or an executioner; or from the necessity of escaping or giving aid, as when a robber is killed by a traveler or an enemy by a soldier. And sometimes the one who was the cause of death is more to blame than the one who killed, as if someone were to deceive his surety and the surety were to pay the lawful penalty in his place. Yet not everyone who is the cause of another's death is guilty. For what if someone solicits illicit intercourse and, failing to obtain it, kills himself? What if a son, fearing his father's loving blows, perishes by throwing himself down a precipice? What if another kills himself because someone has been set free, or so that someone may not be set free? Because of these causes of others' deaths, must we either consent to a crime, or abolish the punishment of sin, even a father's, which is done not from a desire to harm but to correct, or restrain works of mercy? When these things happen, we owe them human grief; we do not, in order to prevent them, suppress the will to do what is right.

### Translation notes

- "Illicit intercourse" renders stuprum, here in the sense of a seduction.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.17 (CSEL 44:415–416; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-17).

## Letter 153.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-18
- Source: CSEL 44:416–417
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Bad consequences that sometimes follow intercession are not imputable to the intercessors, who aim at commending gentleness and saving souls.

### Latin text

Sic etiam, cum intercedimus pro peccatore damnando, sequuntur aliquando, quae nolumus, siue in ipso, qui nostra intercessione liberatur, ut uel immanius inpunita grassetur audacia subdita cupiditati, ingrata lenitati atque unus morti ereptus plurimos necet, uel ipso per beneficium nostrum in melius commutato moribusque correcto alius male uiuendo pereat sibique huius impunitate proposita talia uel grauiora committat. non, ut opinor, haec mala inputanda sunt nobis, cum intercedimus, sed potius illa bona, quae, cum id facimus, intuemur et uolumus, id est commendatio mansuetudinis ad conciliandam dilectionem uerbo ueritatis et ut, qui liberantur a temporali morte, sic uiuant, ne in aeternam, unde numquam liberentur, incurrant.

### English translation (Claude)

So too, when we intercede for a sinner who is to be condemned, things we do not want sometimes follow, either in the very man who is freed by our intercession, so that his boldness, unpunished, rages more savagely, enslaved to desire and ungrateful for leniency, and one man snatched from death kills many; or, while he himself is changed for the better by our kindness and amends his ways, another perishes by living wickedly and, setting before himself this man's impunity, commits similar or worse crimes. These evils, I think, are not to be imputed to us when we intercede, but rather those good things which we have in view and desire when we do it: namely, the commendation of gentleness to win love for the word of truth, and that those who are freed from temporal death may so live as not to incur eternal death, from which they could never be freed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.18 (CSEL 44:416–417; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-18).

## Letter 153.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-19
- Source: CSEL 44:417–419
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Civil severity and episcopal intercession are both useful; Paul's teaching in Romans 13 shows the ruler's sword is from God, and both must act from love.

### Latin text

Prodest ergo et seueritas uestra, cuius ministerio quies adiuuatur et nostra; prodest et intercessio nostra, cuius ministerio seueritas temperatur et uestra. non uobis displiceat, quod rogamini a bonis, quia nec bonis displicet, quod timemini a malis. nam hominum iniquitatem etiam apostolus Paulus non tantum de iudicio futuro uerum etiam de praesentibus uestris securibus terruit adserens et ipsas ad dispensationem diuinae prouidentiae pertinere. omnis, inquit, anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit; non est enim potestas nisi a deo, quae autem sunt, a deo ordinatae sunt. quapropter qui resistit potestati, dei ordinationi resistit, qui autem resistunt, ipsi sibi iudicium adquirunt; principes enim non sunt timori bono operi sed malo. uis autem non timere potestatem? bonum fac et habebis laudem ex illa; dei enim minister est tibi in bonum. quod si malum feceris, time; non enim frustra gladium portat, dei enim minister est, uindex in iram ei, qui male agit. ideoque necessitate subditi estote non solum propter iram sed et propter conscientiam. ideo enim et tributa praestatis; ministri enim dei sunt in hoc ipsum perseuerantes. reddite omnibus debita; cui tributum, tributum, cui uectigal, uectigal, cui timorem, timorem, cui honorem, honorem. nemini quicquam debeatis, nisi ut inuicem diligatis. haec uerba apostoli utilitatem uestrae seueritatis ostendunt. proinde sicut dilectionem iussi sunt terrentibus debere, qui timent, ita dilectionem iussi sunt timentibus debere, qui terrent. nihil nocendi cupiditate fiat sed omnia consulendi caritate et nihil fiet immaniter, nihil inhumaniter. ita formidabitur ultio cognitoris, ut nec intercessoris religio contemnatur, quia et plectendo et ignoscendo hoc solum bene agitur, ut uita hominum corrigatur. quod si tanta est peruersitas et impietas, ut ei corrigendae nec disciplina possit prodesse nec uenia, a bonis tamen intentione atque conscientia, quam deus cernit, siue seueritate siue lenitate non nisi officium dilectionis impletur.

### English translation (Claude)

Your severity, then, is useful, by whose ministry our quiet too is assisted; and our intercession is useful, by whose ministry your severity too is tempered. Do not be displeased at being petitioned by the good, since the good are not displeased that you are feared by the wicked. For the apostle Paul too terrified human wickedness not only with the future judgment but also with your present axes, asserting that they too belong to the dispensation of divine providence. "Let every soul," he says, "be subject to the higher powers; for there is no power except from God, and those that exist have been ordained by God. Therefore whoever resists the power resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist bring judgment on themselves; for rulers are a terror not to good work but to evil. Do you wish not to fear the power? Do good and you will have praise from it; for it is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, fear; for it does not bear the sword in vain, for it is God's minister, an avenger for wrath on him who does evil. Therefore be subject of necessity, not only because of wrath but also because of conscience. For this is why you also pay tribute; for they are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Render to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due, revenue to whom revenue, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor. Owe no one anything except to love one another." These words of the apostle show the usefulness of your severity. Accordingly, just as those who fear have been commanded to owe love to those who inspire terror, so those who inspire terror have been commanded to owe love to those who fear. Let nothing be done from a desire to harm, but all from the love that seeks the other's good, and nothing will be done savagely, nothing inhumanly. Thus the judge's punishment will be dreaded in such a way that the intercessor's religion is not despised, because both in punishing and in pardoning the only good aim is that people's lives be corrected. But if perversity and impiety are so great that neither discipline nor pardon can help to correct them, yet on the part of the good, in the intention and conscience which God sees, whether by severity or by leniency, nothing but the duty of love is fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 13:1–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.19 (CSEL 44:417–419; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-19).

## Letter 153.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-20
- Source: CSEL 44:419–420
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: True repentance requires restoring stolen property when possible; bishops intercede for debtors only to prevent needless cruelty, not to block restitution.

### Latin text

Quod autem in epistula tua sequitur, ubi dicis: Verum nunc, ut mores nostri sunt, et sceleris poenam cupiunt sibi homines relaxari et id, propter quod scelus admissum est, possidere, pessimum hominum genus commemoras, cui paenitendi medicina omnino non prodest. si enim res aliena, propter quam peccatum est, cum reddi possit, non redditur, non agitur paenitentia, sed fingitur; si autem ueraciter agitur, non remittetur peccatum, nisi restituatur ablatum, sed, ut dixi, cum restitui potest. plerumque enim, qui aufert, amittit siue alios patiendo malos siue ipse male uiuendo nec aliud habet, unde restituat. huic certe non possumus dicere: Redde, quod abstulisti?, nisi cum eum habere credimus et negare. ubi quidem si aliquos sustinet a repetente cruciatus, dum existimatur habere, quod reddat, nulla est iniquitas, quia, etsi non est, unde luat ablatam pecuniam, merito tamen, dum eam per molestias corporales redhibere compellitur, peccati, quo male ablata est, poenas luit. sed inhumanum non est etiam pro talibus intercedere tamquam pro reis criminum non ad hoc, ut minime restituantur aliena, sed ne frustra homo in hominem saeuiat ille praesertim, qui iam remisit culpam, sed quaerit pecuniam et fraudari metuit, non expetit uindicari. denique in talibus causis si persuadere potuerimus eos, pro quibus interuenimus, non habere, quod poscitur, continuo nobis eorum molestiae relaxantur. aliquando autem misericordes et in ipso dubio nolunt homini pro incerta pecunia certa inferre supplicia. ad hanc misericordiam etiam nos prouocare et exhortari decet: melius enim, etiam si habet, amittis, quam, si non habet, aut excrucias aut occidis. sed pro istis magis apud eos, qui repetunt, quam apud eos, qui iudicant, intercedere conuenit. ne ipse uideatur auferre, qui, cum habeat potestatem, non cogit reddere, quamuis in cogendo ita debeat adhibere integritatem, ne amittat humanitatem.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what follows in your letter, where you say: "But now, as our customs are, people want both to have the punishment of the crime remitted and to keep that for the sake of which the crime was committed," you mention the worst kind of people, for whom the medicine of repentance is of no benefit at all. For if another's property, on account of which the sin was committed, is not restored when it can be, repentance is not being done but feigned; but if it is truly done, the sin will not be forgiven unless what was taken is restored, but, as I said, when it can be restored. For very often the one who takes it loses it, either by suffering other wicked people or by living wickedly himself, and has nothing else from which to make restitution. To him we certainly cannot say, "Restore what you took," except when we believe he has it and denies it. In that case, if he endures some torments from the one reclaiming it while he is thought to have something to restore, there is no injustice, because even if he has nothing with which to repay the stolen money, he nevertheless deservedly pays the penalty of the sin by which it was wrongly taken while he is compelled through bodily distress to give it back. But it is not inhuman to intercede even for such people, as for those accused of crimes, not so that another's property may not be restored, but so that man may not rage in vain against man, especially the one who has already forgiven the fault but seeks the money and fears being defrauded, not seeking vengeance. In fact, in such cases, if we have been able to persuade people that those for whom we intervene do not have what is demanded, their harassment is at once relaxed for our sake. Sometimes, too, merciful people, even in doubt, are unwilling to inflict certain punishments on a man for uncertain money. To this mercy it is fitting that we too should challenge and exhort them: for it is better that you lose it, even if he has it, than that, if he does not have it, you either torture or kill him. But for such people it is more fitting to intercede with those who reclaim than with those who judge, lest the one who, having the power, does not compel restitution should himself seem to take it away; although in compelling he ought to use integrity in such a way as not to lose humanity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.20 (CSEL 44:419–420; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-20).

## Letter 153.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-21
- Source: CSEL 44:420–421
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A bishop who shields someone from making restitution shares his crime; bishops rebuke such people and may exclude them from communion.

### Latin text

Illud uero fidentissime dixerim, eum, qui pro homine ad hoc interuenit, ne male ablata restituat, et qui ad se confugientem, quantum honeste potest, ad restituendum non compellit, socium esse fraudis et criminis. nam misericordius opem nostram talibus subtrahimus, quam inpendimus; non enim opem fert, qui ad peccandum adiuuat ac non potius subuertit atque opprimit. sed numquid ideo nos aut exigere aut exigendum tradere uel possumus uel debemus? agimus, quantum episcopalis facultas datur, et humanum quidem nonnumquam sed maxime ac semper diuinum iudicium comminantes. nolentes autem reddere, quos nouimus et male abstulisse et, unde reddant, habere, arguimus, increpamus, detestamur quosdam clam, quosdam palam, sicut diuersitas personarum diuersam uidetur posse recipere medicinam nec in aliorum perniciem ad maiorem insaniam concitari, aliquando etiam, si res magis curanda non impedit, sancti altaris communione priuamus.

### English translation (Claude)

This, however, I would say with full confidence: whoever intervenes for a man so that he need not restore what he wrongly took, and whoever does not compel one who takes refuge with him to make restitution, as far as he honorably can, is an accomplice in the fraud and the crime. For we withdraw our help from such people more mercifully than we give it; for he does not bring help who helps someone to sin, rather than overturning and crushing the sin. But can we or should we therefore either exact payment or hand people over to be made to pay? We act as far as the power of a bishop allows, threatening sometimes human judgment indeed, but chiefly and always divine judgment. Those whom we know both to have taken wrongly and to have the means to restore, if they refuse to restore, we rebuke, reprove, and denounce, some privately, some publicly, as the difference of persons seems able to receive different medicine and not to be provoked to greater madness to the ruin of others; and sometimes, if a matter needing greater care does not prevent it, we deprive them of communion at the holy altar.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.21 (CSEL 44:420–421; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-21).

## Letter 153.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-22
- Source: CSEL 44:421–423
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Bishop and judge may differ about the facts of a case, but both agree that stolen property must be restored; Augustine intercedes only for pardon combined with restitution.

### Latin text

Verum saepe accidit, ut nos fallant uel negando se abstulisse uel adfirmando se, unde restituant, non habere; saepe etiam et uos fallimini putando uel nos non agere, ut reddant, uel ipsos habere, unde reddant; et omnes aut paene omnes homines amamus nostras suspiciones uel uocare uel existimare cognitiones, quando credibilibus rerum signis mouemur, cum credibilia nonnulla sint falsa, sicut incredibilia nonnulla sunt uera. ideo quosdam commemorans, qui et sceleris poenam sibi cupiunt relaxari et id, propter quod scelus admissum est, possidere), addidisti et aisti: Pro his quoque interueniendum putat sacerdotium uestrum. fieri enim potest, ut tu scias, quod ego nescio, et propterea putem pro aliquo interueniendum. quod me fallere potuit, cum te non potuerit, ut ego eum non credam possidere, quod tu possidere nosti. ita fit, ut, cum de reo sententia non una sit nostra, neutri tamen nostrum placeat, quod res non redditur aliena. de homine ut homines diuersa sentimus, sed in ipsa iustitia simul sumus. eo modo etiam fieri potest, ut, quod scio aliquem non habere, hoc eum tu habere non certissime teneas, sed credibiliter suspiceris et ob hoc tibi uidear interuenire pro eo, qui et sceleris poenam sibi cupiat relaxari et id, propter quod scelus admissum est possidere. ad summam igitur neque apud te neque apud tales, si qui reperiuntur, qualem te esse gaudemus, neque apud ipsos, qui magno studio aliena ac nihil profutura multaque etiam periculosa ac perniciosa petunt, neque apud cor meum, cui testis est deus, ausim dicere, sentire, decernere interueniendum esse pro aliquo, ut, quod scelere abstulit, sceleris impunitate possideat, sed ut remissa iniuria, quod iniuriose abstulit, reddat, si tamen habet uel quod abstulit uel aliud, unde illud restituat.

### English translation (Claude)

But it often happens that they deceive us, either by denying that they took anything or by asserting that they have nothing from which to restore it; and often you too are deceived, thinking either that we are not working to make them restore or that they have the means to restore. And all, or almost all, of us love to call or to regard our suspicions as knowledge, when we are moved by credible signs, although some credible things are false, just as some incredible things are true. So, mentioning some who "want both to have the punishment of the crime remitted and to keep that for the sake of which the crime was committed," you added: "For these too your priesthood thinks it should intervene." For it can happen that you know what I do not know, and therefore I think I should intervene for someone; what could deceive me, though it could not deceive you, so that I do not believe he possesses what you know he possesses. So it happens that, although our judgment about the accused is not the same, neither of us is pleased that another's property is not restored. About the man, as men, we think differently, but in justice itself we are together. In the same way it can also happen that what I know someone does not have, you do not hold with full certainty that he has, but suspect it credibly, and on this account I seem to you to intervene for one who "wants both to have the punishment of the crime remitted and to keep that for the sake of which the crime was committed." In sum, then, neither before you, nor before such men as we rejoice that you are (if any are found), nor before those who with great eagerness seek others' property, which will profit them nothing and is often dangerous and ruinous, nor before my own heart, to which God is witness, would I dare to say, think, or decide that one should intervene for anyone so that he may keep what he took by crime with the crime unpunished, but rather that, the injury being pardoned, he may restore what he took injuriously, provided he has either what he took or something else from which to restore it.

### Translation notes

- The digital text opens and fails to close a parenthesis twice in this section; the quoted words are Macedonius's.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.22 (CSEL 44:421–423; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-22).

## Letter 153.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-23
- Source: CSEL 44:423
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Not every payment taken from the unwilling is unjust, but judges and witnesses must never sell their verdicts or testimony, even when just.

### Latin text

Non sane quicquid ab inuito sumitur, iniuriose aufertur. nam plerique nec medico uolunt reddere honorem suum nec operario mercedem, nec tamen haec qui ab inuitis accipiunt, per iniuriam accipiunt, quae potius per iniuriam non darentur. sed non ideo debet iudex uendere iustum iudicium aut testis uerum testimonium, quia uendit aduocatus iustum patrocinium et iuris peritus uerum consilium; illi enim inter utramque partem ad examen adhibentur, isti ex una parte consistunt. cum autem iudicia et testimonia, quae nec iusta et uera uendenda sunt, iniqua et falsa uenduntur, multo sceleratius utique pecunia sumitur, quia scelerate etiam quamuis a uolentibus datur. ille tamen solet tamquam male sibi ablatam pecuniam repetere, qui iustum iudicium emit, quoniam uenale esse non debuit; qui uero pro iniquo iudicio dedit, uellet quidem repetere, nisi timeret uel puderet emisse.

### English translation (Claude)

Not everything, of course, that is taken from an unwilling person is taken injuriously. For many people do not want to pay a doctor his fee or a workman his wages; yet those who receive these from the unwilling do not receive them by injury; rather, it would be by injury that they were not given. But a judge ought not therefore to sell a just judgment, or a witness true testimony, because an advocate sells just pleading and a jurist true counsel; for the former are brought in between both parties for the examination, while the latter stand on one side. But when judgments and testimonies, which ought not to be sold even when just and true, are sold when unjust and false, the money is certainly taken far more wickedly, because it is taken wickedly even though given by willing parties. Yet the one who bought a just judgment usually reclaims the money as wrongly taken from him, since it ought not to have been for sale; whereas the one who gave money for an unjust judgment would indeed like to reclaim it, if he were not afraid or ashamed of having bought it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.23 (CSEL 44:423; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-23).

## Letter 153.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-24
- Source: CSEL 44:423–424
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Customary fees taken by court officials may be given to the poor, but what was taken by theft or extortion must be restored, as Zacchaeus did.

### Latin text

Sunt aliae personae inferioris loci, quae ab utraque parte non insolenter accipiunt sicut officialis, et a quo admouetur et cui admouetur officium; ab his extorta per inmoderatam inprobitatem repeti solent, data per tolerabilem consuetudinem non solent magisque reprehendimus, qui talia inusitate repetiuerunt, quam qui ea de more sumpserunt, quoniam multae necessariae personae rebus humanis uel inuitantur huius modi commodis uel tenentur. isti si uiam uitae mutauerint aut excellentioris conscenderint sanctitatis gradum, facilius ea, quae hoc modo adquisierunt, tamquam sua pauperibus largiuntur. quam eis, a quibus accepta sunt, tamquam aliena restituunt qui uero contra morem societatis humanae furtis, rapinis, calumniis, oppressionibus, inuasionibus abstulerit, reddenda potius quam donanda censemus Zachaei publicani euangelico exemplo, qui cum hospitio dominum suscepisset, in uitam sanctam repente mutatus: Dimidium, inquit, rerum mearum do pauperibus et, si cui aliquid abstuli, quadruplum reddo.

### English translation (Claude)

There are other persons of lower rank who commonly receive from both parties, such as a court official, both from the one who sets his office in motion and from the one against whom it is set in motion. From these, what has been extorted through excessive dishonesty is usually reclaimed; what has been given according to tolerable custom usually is not, and we blame those who unusually reclaimed such things more than those who took them according to custom, since many persons necessary to human affairs are either attracted or retained by advantages of this kind. If these men change their way of life or ascend to a higher degree of holiness, they more readily give to the poor as their own what they acquired in this way than restore it as another's to those from whom it was received. But whoever has taken things contrary to the custom of human society, by theft, robbery, false accusation, oppression, or seizure, we judge ought rather to restore than to give away, following the gospel example of Zacchaeus the tax collector, who, when he had received the Lord as his guest, was suddenly changed into a holy life and said: "Half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken anything from anyone, I restore it fourfold."

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 19:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.24 (CSEL 44:423–424; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-24).

## Letter 153.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-25
- Source: CSEL 44:424–426
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: An advocate who wins unjust cases has more reason to restore his fees than a minor official; usury too is wrong possession, though no court will order its return.

### Latin text

Verum tamen si iustitia sincerius consulatur, iustius dicitur aduocato: Redde, quod accepisti, quando contra ueritatem stetisti, iniquitati adfuisti, iudicem fefellisti, iustam causam oppressisti, de falsitate uicisti, quod uides multos honestissimos et disertissimos uiros non solum impune uerum etiam gloriose uideri sibi committere, quam cuiquam in quolibet officio militanti: Redde, quod accepisti, quando iubente iudice cuicumque causae necessarium hominem tenuisti, ne resisteret, uinxisti, ne fugeret, inclusisti, postremo aut permanente lite exhibuisti aut finita dimisisti. sed illud cur aduocato non dicatur. in promptu est, quia scilicet ita non uult homo repetere, quod patrono, ut male uinceret, dedit, sicut non uult reddere, quod ab aduersario, cum male uicisset, accepit. quis tandem aduocatus aut ex aduocato ita uir optimus facile reperitur, qui suscepto suo dicat: Recipe, quod mihi, cum tibi male adessem, dedisti, et redde aduersario tuo, quod me agente inique abstulisti? et tamen, quem prioris non rectae uitae rectissime paenitet, etiam hoc facere debet, ut, si ille, qui inique litigauit, non uult admonitus corrigere iniquitatem, eius tamen iniquitatis nolit iste habere mercedem, nisi forte restituendum est alienum, quod per furtum clanculo aufertur, et restituendum non est, quod in ipso foro, ubi peccata puniuntur, decepto iudice et circumuentis legibus obtinetur. quid dicam de usuris, quas etiam ipsae leges et iudices reddi iubent? an crudelior est, qui subtrahit aliquid uel eripit diuiti, quam qui trucidat pauperem faenore? haec atque huius modi male utique possidentur et uellem restituerentur; sed non est, quo iudice repetantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet if justice is consulted more honestly, it would be more justly said to an advocate: "Restore what you received when you stood against the truth, supported iniquity, deceived the judge, crushed a just cause, and won by falsehood" (which you see many most honorable and eloquent men think they do not only with impunity but even with glory) than to anyone serving in any office: "Restore what you received when, at the judge's order, you held a man needed for some case, bound him so he would not resist, shut him up so he would not escape, and finally either produced him while the suit continued or released him when it was ended." But why this is not said to an advocate is obvious: a man does not want to reclaim what he gave his advocate so as to win wrongly, just as he does not want to return what he received from his opponent when he won wrongly. Where, in fact, is an advocate, or a former advocate, easily found who is so excellent a man as to say to his client: "Take back what you gave me when I wrongly supported you, and return to your opponent what you unjustly took through my pleading"? And yet one who most rightly repents of his former, not upright life ought to do even this, so that, if the one who litigated unjustly will not correct the injustice when admonished, he at least may not wish to keep the wages of that injustice; unless perhaps what is secretly taken by theft must be restored, and what is obtained in the very forum where sins are punished, by deceiving the judge and evading the laws, need not be restored! What shall I say of interest, which the laws and the judges themselves order to be paid? Or is he who filches or snatches something from a rich man crueler than he who butchers a poor man with usury? These and similar things are certainly possessed wrongly, and I wish they were restored; but there is no judge before whom they can be reclaimed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.25 (CSEL 44:424–426; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-25).

## Letter 153.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-26
- Source: CSEL 44:426–428
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Only the just truly possess what they have; civil law restrains bad possessors until the godly reach the eternal city, and Augustine closes his letter to Macedonius.

### Latin text

Iam uero si prudenter intueamur, quod scriptum est: Fidelis hominis totus mundus diuitiarum est, infidelis autem nec obolus, nonne omnes, qui sibi uidentur gaudere licite conquisitis eisque uti nesciunt, aliena possidere conuincimus? hoc enim certe alienum non est, quod iure possidetur, hoc autem iure, quod iuste, et hoc iuste, quod bene. omne igitur, quod male possidetur, alienum est, male autem possidet, qui male utitur. cernis ergo, quam multi debeant reddere aliena siue pauci, quibus reddantur, reperiantur; qui tamen ubiubi sunt, tanto magis ista contemnunt, quanto ea iustius possidere potuerunt. iustitiam quippe et nemo male habet et, qui non dilexerit, non habet. pecunia uero et a malis male habetur et a bonis tanto melius habetur, quanto minus amatur. sed inter haec toleratur iniquitas male habentium et quaedam inter eos iura constituuntur, quae appellantur ciuilia, non quod hinc fiat, ut bene utentes sint, sed ut male utentes minus molesti sint, donec fideles et pii, quorum iure sunt omnia, qui uel ex illis fiunt uel inter illos tantisper uiuentes malis eorum non obstringuntur, sed exercentur, perueniant ad illam ciuitatem, ubi hereditas aeternitas est, ubi non habet nisi iustus locum, non nisi sapiens principatum, ubi possidebunt, quicumque ibi erunt, uere sua. sed tamen etiam hic non intercedimus, ut secundum mores legesque terrenas non restituantur aliena, quamuis placabiles uos uelimus malis, non ut placeant uel permaneant mali, sed quia ex illis fiunt, quicumque fiunt boni, et sacrificio misericordiae placatur deus, quem nisi propitium haberent mali, nulli essent boni. Diu est, ut occupationibus tuis loquendo uideor onerosus, cum tibi homini acuto et docto cito solui potuerit, quod quaerebas. iam dudum autem finire deberem, si te tantum putarem fuisse lecturum, quod flagitasti ut rescriberem. felix in Christo uiuas, fili carissime.

### English translation (Claude)

Now if we consider wisely what is written, "To the faithful man the whole world is wealth, but to the unfaithful not even a penny," do we not prove that all who seem to themselves to rejoice in what they lawfully acquired and do not know how to use it possess what belongs to others? For certainly that is not another's which is possessed by right; and that is possessed by right which is possessed justly; and that justly which is possessed well. Everything, therefore, that is possessed badly belongs to another, and he possesses badly who uses badly. You see, then, how many ought to restore what belongs to others, though few may be found to whom it should be restored; and these, wherever they are, despise such things the more, the more justly they could have possessed them. For no one has justice badly, and whoever has not loved it does not have it. But money is both had badly by the wicked and had the better by the good, the less it is loved. Meanwhile, however, the iniquity of those who have badly is tolerated, and certain rights are established among them which are called civil, not with the result that they become good users, but that bad users may be less harmful, until the faithful and godly, to whom by right all things belong (whether they come from among those others or, living among them for a while, are not entangled by their evils but exercised by them), reach that city where the inheritance is eternity, where only the just man has a place, only the wise man has rule, where all who are there will possess what is truly their own. Yet even here we do not intercede so that, according to earthly customs and laws, others' property may not be restored, although we wish you to be placable toward the wicked, not that the wicked may please you or remain wicked, but because from among them come all who become good, and God is appeased by the sacrifice of mercy; and if the wicked did not have him propitious, there would be no good people. I have long seemed burdensome to your occupations by talking, when what you asked could have been resolved quickly for a sharp and learned man like you. I ought indeed to have finished long ago, if I thought you would read only what you demanded that I write in reply. May you live happily in Christ, dearest son.

### Scripture references

- Prov 17:6: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The opening quotation is the Septuagint addition after Prov 17:6 (17:6a), absent from the Hebrew.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 153.26 (CSEL 44:426–428; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-153-26).

## Letter 154.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-1
- Source: CSEL 44:428
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius, vicar of Africa, writes to Augustine that he has granted the petition Augustine made on behalf of certain people, praising his modest way of interceding.

### Latin text

Miro modo afficior sapientia tua et in illis, quae edidisti, et in his, quae interueniens pro sollicitis mittere non grauaris. nam et illa tantum habent acuminis, scientiae, sanctitatis, ut nihil supra sit, et haec tantum uerecundiae, ut, nisi faciam, quod mandas, culpam penes me remanere non in negotio esse diiudicem, domine merito uenerabilis et suscipiende pater. non enim instas, quod plerique homines istius loci faciunt, ut, quodcumque sollicitus uoluerit, extorqueas; sed quod tibi a iudice tot curis obstricto petibile uisum fuerit, admones subseruiente uerecundia, quae maxima difficilium inter bonos efficacia est. proinde statim commendatis effectum desiderii tribui; nam sperandi uiam ante patefeceram.

### English translation (Claude)

I am wonderfully affected by your wisdom, both in what you have published and in what you do not mind sending when you intervene on behalf of people in trouble. For the former have so much sharpness, knowledge, and holiness that nothing could surpass them, and the latter so much modesty that, if I did not do what you ask, I would judge that the fault in the matter remained with me, my lord, deservedly venerable and father worthy to be honored. For you do not insist, as most men in this region do, on extorting whatever the troubled person wants; rather, what has seemed to you fit to ask of a judge bound by so many cares, you suggest with a deferential modesty, which among good men is the most effective means in difficult matters. Accordingly, I at once granted those you commended what they desired; for I had already opened the way to hope.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Macedonius to Augustine, replying to Ep. 153.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 154.1 (CSEL 44:428; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-1).

## Letter 154.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-2
- Source: CSEL 44:428–430
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius praises the first books of Augustine's City of God for refuting the pagan claim that Christianity brought calamity, drawing on the recent disaster.

### Latin text

Explicui libros tuos; neque enim tam languidi aut inertes erant, ut me aliud quam se curare paterentur; iniecerunt manum ereptumque aliis sollicitudinum suis uinculis inligarunt — ita enim mihi propitius deus sit —, ut ego anceps sim, quid in illis magis mirer, sacerdotii perfectionem, philosophiae dogmata, historiae plenam notitiam an facundiae iucunditatem, quae ita etiam inperitos allicere potest, ut, donec explicent, non desistant, et, cum explicauerint, adhuc requirant. conuicti namque sunt inpudenter pertinaces iam inde a bonis, quae memorant, saeculis pro naturae rerum obscuritate contigisse peiora falsosque omnes inlitis quadam dulcedine felicitatibus suis, per quas non ad beatitudinem sed ad praerupta sunt ducti, haec uero nostra praecepta et simplicis uerique dei mysteria praeter uitam perpetuam, quam purissimis uirtutibus pollicentur, etiam haec saecularia et necessario, qua nati sumus, euentura mitigare. et usus es ualidissimo exemplo recentis calamitatis, quo licet firmissime causam muniueris, tamen, si utrumuis licuisset, id tibi nolueram suffragari. sed quando inde orta fuerat conuincendorum stultitiae querela, necesse fuit inde argumenta ueritatis accersere.

### English translation (Claude)

I have read your books; for they were not so languid or inert as to let me attend to anything but themselves. They laid hands on me, snatched me from other anxieties, and bound me with their own chains (so may God be gracious to me) so that I am in doubt what to admire more in them: the perfection of the priesthood, the doctrines of philosophy, the full knowledge of history, or the charm of eloquence, which can so attract even the unlearned that they do not stop until they finish, and when they have finished, still want more. For those who are shamelessly obstinate have been refuted: that ever since those good ages they recall, worse things befell because of the obscurity of the nature of things, and that all their prosperity, smeared with a certain sweetness, was false, leading them not to happiness but to precipices; whereas these precepts of ours and the mysteries of the one true God, besides the eternal life which they promise to the purest virtues, also mitigate these worldly events, which must necessarily befall us in the condition in which we were born. And you used the most powerful example of the recent calamity; though with it you fortified the cause most firmly, yet, had either course been possible, I would have wished it not to support you. But since the complaint of the foolish who were to be refuted had arisen from there, it was necessary to draw from there the arguments of truth.

### Translation notes

- "Your books": the first three books of the City of God (cf. Ep. 155.2, "three books"). "The recent calamity": the sack of Rome by Alaric in 410.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 154.2 (CSEL 44:428–430; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-2).

## Letter 154.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-3
- Source: CSEL 44:430
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius closes, promising to write again from Italy.

### Latin text

Haec interim occupatus aliis curis, quae etsi uanae sunt cum rerum exitum cogitamus, tamen quasi necessariae pro nascendi condicione, rescripsi. si otium fuerit et superstes uita, etiam de Italia rescribam. ut tantae doctrinae opus debitis etsi non satisfacientibus remuneretur officiis. incolumem beatamque sanctitatem tuam deus omnipotens aeuo largissimo tueatur, domine merito uenerabilis et uere suscipiende pater.

### English translation (Claude)

I have written this in reply meanwhile, being occupied with other cares, which, though they are vain when we think of the end of things, are nevertheless as it were necessary because of the condition of our birth. If I have leisure and life remains, I shall write to you also from Italy, so that the work of such great learning may be repaid with due, if not adequate, services. May almighty God keep your Holiness safe and blessed for a very long age, my lord, deservedly venerable and truly father worthy to be honored.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 154.3 (CSEL 44:430; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/153-12/#p-154-3).

## Letter 155.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-1
- Source: CSEL 44:430–431
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Macedonius and rejoices that he longs for the heavenly commonwealth ruled by Christ, the source of true friendship.

### Latin text

Quamuis sapientiam, quam mihi tribuis, in me non agnoscam. tantae tamen erga me beniuolentiae tuae tamque sincerae gratias ago debeoque plurimas et meorum studiorum labores tali ac tanto uiro placuisse delector, multo uero amplius, quod animum tuum caritate aeternitatis et ueritatis atque ipsius caritatis affectum diuinae illi caelestique rei publicae, cuius regnator est Christus et in qua sola semper beateque uiuendum est, si recte hic pieque uiuatur, agnosco inhiantem, uideo propinquantem eiusque potiundae amplector ardentem. inde quippe manat etiam uera amicitia, non pensanda temporalibus commodis sed gratuito amore potanda. nemo enim potest ueraciter amicus esse hominis, nisi fuerit ipsius primitus ueritatis; quod si gratis non fiat, nullo fieri pacto potest.

### English translation (Claude)

Although I do not recognize in myself the wisdom you attribute to me, I thank you, and owe you very many thanks, for your goodwill toward me, so great and so sincere, and I am delighted that the labors of my studies have pleased such a great man; but much more that I recognize your mind, moved by love of eternity and of truth and of love itself, longing for that divine and heavenly commonwealth whose ruler is Christ and in which alone one may live always and happily, if one lives rightly and piously here; I see it drawing near and I embrace it as it burns to possess it. For from there flows also true friendship, which is to be weighed not by temporal advantages but drunk with freely given love. For no one can truly be a friend of a man unless he is first a friend of the truth itself; and if this is not done freely, it cannot be done at all.

### Translation notes

- Reply of Augustine to Macedonius (Ep. 154).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.1 (CSEL 44:430–431; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-1).

## Letter 155.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-2
- Source: CSEL 44:431–432
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The philosophers lacked true piety because they sought to make themselves happy by their own virtue, and so absurdly allowed the wise man to kill himself to escape suffering.

### Latin text

De qua re etiam philosophi multa dixerunt; sed apud eos uera pietas, id est uerax ueri dei cultus, unde omnia recte uiuendi duci oportet officia, non inuenitur non ob aliud, quantum intellego, nisi quia beatam uitam ipsi sibi quodam modo fabricare uoluerunt potiusque patrandam quam impetrandam putarunt, cum eius dator non sit nisi deus. neque enim facit beatum hominem, nisi qui fecit hominem. nam qui tanta creaturae suae bona bonis malisque largitur, ut sint, ut homines sint, ut uigentes sensibus, ualentes uiribus, adfluentes opibus sint, se ipsum bonis dabit, ut beati sint, quia eius etiam hoc est munus, ut boni sint. illi uero, qui in hac aerumnosa uita, in his moribundis membris. sub hac sarcina corruptibilis carnis auctores suae beatae uitae et quasi conditores esse uoluerunt uelut propriis eam uirtutibus appetentes iamque retinentes, non ab illo fonte uirtutum petentes atque sperantes, deum superbiae suae resistentem sentire minime potuerunt. unde in errorem absurdissimum lapsi sunt, ut, cum adseuerant etiam in Phalaridis tauro beatum esse sapientem, cogantur fateri uitam beatam aliquando esse fugiendam. exaggeratis enim malis corporis cedunt atque in eorum molestiis grauissimis abscedendum ex hac uita esse decernunt. ubi nolo dicere, quantum sit nefas se ipsum hominem occidere insontem, cum omnino non debeat uel nocentem, unde in primo libro trium illorum, quos benignissime et studiosissime perlegisti, multa iam diximus. sed certe consideretur nec superbe sed sobrie iudicetur, quo modo uita beata sit, qua non sapiens retenta fruitur, sed inlatis sibi manibus carere compellitur.

### English translation (Claude)

On this subject the philosophers too have said much; but among them true piety, that is, the truthful worship of the true God, from which all the duties of right living ought to be derived, is not found, for no other reason, as far as I understand, than that they wished somehow to fashion the happy life for themselves and thought it something to be achieved rather than obtained by asking, though its giver is none but God. For no one makes a man happy except the one who made man. For he who lavishes such great goods of his creation on the good and the evil, that they exist, that they are human beings, that they are vigorous in their senses, strong in their powers, abounding in wealth, will give himself to the good so that they may be happy, since it is also his gift that they are good. But those who, in this toilsome life, in these dying members, under this burden of corruptible flesh, wished to be the authors and as it were the founders of their own happy life, as though seeking it and already holding it by their own virtues, not seeking and hoping for it from that fountain of virtues, were quite unable to perceive God resisting their pride. Hence they fell into the most absurd error, so that, while they assert that the wise man is happy even in the bull of Phalaris, they are compelled to admit that the happy life must sometimes be fled. For they yield to the accumulated evils of the body and decide that in their most grievous afflictions one must depart from this life. Here I do not wish to say how great a crime it is for a man to kill himself when innocent, since he ought not to do so even when guilty, on which we have already said much in the first of those three books which you read through so kindly and so attentively. But let it at least be considered, and judged not proudly but soberly, how that can be a happy life which the wise man does not keep and enjoy, but is compelled to be deprived of by laying hands on himself.

### Scripture references

- Jas 4:6: echo, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 5:5: echo, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 5.75 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Phalaris, tyrant of Acragas, roasted victims in a bronze bull; the Stoic claim that the wise man is happy even in it is found in Cicero (Tusc. 2.17, 5.75). Suicide is treated in City of God 1.17–27. Scripture: Jas 4:6 / 1 Pet 5:5 (God resists the proud), echo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.2 (CSEL 44:431–432; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-2).

## Letter 155.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-3
- Source: CSEL 44:432–434
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Cicero's Tusculans show the contradiction of philosophers who call the wise man always happy yet advise him to kill himself under extreme suffering; the remedy is to pray to God.

### Latin text

Est apud Ciceronem in extrema, ut scis, parte quinti Tusculanarum libri locus propter hoc, quod dico, animaduertendus. cum enim de caecitate corporis ageret atque adfirmaret etiam caecum beatum esse posse sapientem, multa dixit, quae per aures percipiendo gauderet, itemque, si surdus esset, ea, quibus oblectaretur, ad oculos transtulit; si autem utroque sensu priuaretur et caecus surdusque fieret, non est ausus hinc ferre sententiam eumque beatum dicere, sed addidit etiam dolores grauissimos corporis, qui eum si non interemerint, ipse se interimat et ad portum non sentiendi hac liberatus uirtute perueniat. cedit igitur sapiens immanissimis cladibus atque succumbit in tantum, ut eis cogatur et in se ipsum homicidium perpetrare. cui iam parcat, ut illis careat malis, qui sibi ipse non parcit? certe semper beatus est, certe beatam uitam in sua potestate constitutam nulla ui potest ullius calamitatis amittere. ecce in caecitate et surditate et atrocissimis cruciatibus corporis aut amisit beatam uitam aut, si et in istis afflictionibus adhuc beata est, fit per huius modi doctissimorum hominum disputationes, ut sit aliquando beata uita, quam sapiens ferre non possit uel, quod est absurdius, quam sapiens ferre non debeat eamque fugiat, abrumpat, abiciat seseque ab ea ferro etiam seu ueneno ullaue alia uoluntaria morte subducat, ut in portu non sentiendi uel nullus omnino sit. quod Epicurei et si qui alii simili stultitia putauerunt, uel ideo beatus, quoniam fuerit ab illa beata uita tamquam ab aliqua peste liberatus. o nimium superba iactantia! si beata uita est in cruciatibus corporis, aut non in ea manet sapiens, ut fruatur? si autem misera est, quid, obsecro te, nisi typhus impedit, ne fateatur, ne oret deum, ne iusto et misericordi supplicet, qui potens est et uitae huius mala uel auertere uel mitigare uel ad ea toleranda fortitudine armare uel ab eis omni modo liberare et post haec uere beatam uitam dare, quo nullum malum admittatur et ubi summum bonum numquam amittatur?

### English translation (Claude)

There is a passage in Cicero, as you know, at the end of the fifth book of the Tusculans, which deserves attention on account of what I am saying. For when he was treating of blindness of the body and asserting that even a blind wise man can be happy, he mentioned many things in which he could take delight by hearing; and likewise, if he were deaf, he transferred to the eyes the things in which he could find pleasure. But if he were deprived of both senses and became blind and deaf, Cicero did not dare to give a verdict and call him happy, but added also the most severe bodily pains, which, if they did not kill him, he should kill himself, and, freed by this virtue, reach the harbor of feeling nothing. The wise man, then, yields to the most savage disasters and succumbs to such a degree that he is compelled by them even to commit homicide against himself. Whom will he spare, to be rid of those evils, who does not spare himself? Surely he is always happy; surely the happy life, placed in his own power, can be lost by no force of any calamity! See: in blindness and deafness and the most atrocious torments of the body, he has either lost the happy life, or, if it is still happy even in these afflictions, it results from the disputations of such very learned men that there is sometimes a happy life which the wise man cannot bear, or, what is more absurd, which the wise man ought not to bear, and flees it, breaks it off, casts it away, and withdraws himself from it by the sword or by poison or by some other voluntary death, so that in the harbor of feeling nothing he either does not exist at all (as the Epicureans and any others of similar folly thought), or is happy precisely because he has been freed from that happy life as from some plague. O too proud boasting! If the life in bodily torments is happy, why does the wise man not remain in it to enjoy it? But if it is miserable, what, I ask you, prevents him, except pride, from admitting it, from praying to God, from supplicating the just and merciful one, who is able either to avert or to mitigate the evils of this life, or to arm us with fortitude to bear them, or to free us from them altogether, and after them to give a truly happy life, into which no evil is admitted and where the highest good is never lost?

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 5.111–118 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, Tusc. 5.111–118. "Pride" renders typhus (Greek τῦφος, "vanity"). The digital text reads "aut non" where the sense requires "cur non" ("why not"); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.3 (CSEL 44:432–434; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-3).

## Letter 155.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-4
- Source: CSEL 44:434–435
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christians endure this life in the hope of eternal happiness, as Christ's passion and resurrection teach; even Cicero called this life a death.

### Latin text

Hoc piorum praemium est, cuius adipiscendi spe uitam istam temporalem atque mortalem non tam delectabiliter quam tolerabiliter ducimus et mala eius tunc bono consilio et diuino munere fortiter ferimus, cum bonorum aeternorum fideli dei promissione et fideli nostra expectatione gaudemus. ad hoc nos exhortatus apostolus ait: Spe gaudentes, in tribulatione patientes: ostendit enim, quare (in tribulatione patientes, praemittendo spe gaudentes). ad hanc spem exhortor per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. hoc enim deus ipse magister latente maiestate diuinitatis et carnis infirmitate apparente non solum sermonis oraculo docuit uerum etiam suae passionis et resurrectionis exemplo; in altera enim, qualia tolerare, in altera, qualia debeamus sperare, monstrauit. cuius et illi gratiam mererentur, nisi elati inflatique superbia inaniter conarentur istam uitam beatam sibi ipsi facere, quod solus deus ueraciter cultoribus suis post hanc uitam se largiturum esse promisit. sanior quippe est eiusdem Ciceronis illa sententia, ubi ait: Nam haec quidem uita mors est, quam lamentari possem, si liberet. quo modo ergo, si recte lamentatur, beata comprobatur ac non potius, quoniam recte lamentatur, misera esse conuincitur? quare adsuesce, obsecro te, uir bone, beatus esse interim spe, ut sis etiam re, cum pietati perseuerantissimae retribuetur merces felicitatis aeternae.

### English translation (Claude)

This is the reward of the godly, in the hope of obtaining which we lead this temporal and mortal life not so much with delight as with endurance, and bear its evils bravely by good counsel and divine gift, when we rejoice in the faithful promise of God and in our own faithful expectation of eternal goods. Exhorting us to this, the apostle says: "Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation"; for by putting "rejoicing in hope" first he showed why we are "patient in tribulation." To this hope I exhort you through Jesus Christ our Lord. For God himself, as teacher, with the majesty of his divinity hidden and the weakness of the flesh apparent, taught this not only by the oracle of his word but also by the example of his passion and resurrection: in the one he showed what we ought to endure, in the other what we ought to hope for. The philosophers too would have deserved his grace, if, lifted up and puffed up with pride, they had not vainly tried to make this happy life for themselves, which God alone has truly promised that he will lavish on his worshipers after this life. Sounder, indeed, is that opinion of the same Cicero, where he says: "For this life is indeed death, which I could lament if I wished." How, then, if it is rightly lamented, is it proved happy, and not rather, since it is rightly lamented, shown to be miserable? So accustom yourself, I beg you, good sir, to be happy in the meantime in hope, so that you may also be so in reality, when the reward of eternal happiness is repaid to most persevering piety.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:12: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Tusc. 1.75 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 12:12. Cicero, Tusc. 1.75.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.4 (CSEL 44:434–435; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-4).

## Letter 155.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-5
- Source: CSEL 44:435–436
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: True wisdom is the worship of the true God, and whatever wisdom Augustine has is God's gift, not his own merit.

### Latin text

Si prolixa epistula onerosus sum, tute hoc intristi tibi, qui me sapientem appellasti. hinc enim ausus sum haec ad te loqui, ut tibi sapientiam, non qualis mihi sit, ostentarem, sed, qualis esse debeat, ostenderem. haec est autem in praesenti saeculo uerus ueri dei cultus, ut sit eius in futuro saeculo certus atque integer fructus; hic constantissima pietas, ibi sempiterna felicitas. ex ista sapientia, quae una uera est, si quid habeo, a deo sumpsi, non a me praesumpsi atque ab illo in me perfici fideliter spero, a quo inchoatum esse humiliter gaudeo nec in eo, quod adhuc non donauit, incredulus nec in eo, quod iam donauit, ingratus. non enim meo uel ingenio uel merito sed eius dono sum, si quid laudabiliter sum. nam quaedam acutissima et excellentissima ingenia tanto in maiores errores ierunt, quanto praefidentius tamquam suis uiribus cucurrerunt nec suppliciter ac ueraciter deum, ut uiam sibi ostenderet, petiuerunt. merita uero quorumlibet hominum quae sunt, quando quidem ille, qui non cum mercede debita sed cum gratuita gratia uenit, omnes peccatores solus a peccatis liber et liberator inuenit?

### English translation (Claude)

If I am burdensome with a long letter, you brought this on yourself by calling me wise. For this is why I have dared to say these things to you: not to display to you wisdom such as I have, but to show what it ought to be. In this present world it is the true worship of the true God, so that its fruit in the world to come may be sure and complete: here most constant piety, there everlasting happiness. If I have anything of this wisdom, which alone is true, I have received it from God, not presumed it from myself, and I faithfully hope that it will be perfected in me by him, from whom I humbly rejoice that it has begun, neither unbelieving in what he has not yet given nor ungrateful for what he has already given. For if I am anything praiseworthy, I am so not by my own talent or merit but by his gift. For some most acute and excellent minds have gone into the greater errors the more presumptuously they ran as though by their own strength, and did not humbly and truly ask God to show them the way. As for the merits of any human beings, what are they, since he who came not with wages owed but with grace freely given found all men sinners, he alone free from sin and the liberator from it?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.5 (CSEL 44:435–436; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-5).

## Letter 155.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-6
- Source: CSEL 44:436–437
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Virtue and happiness come only from God; trusting in oneself, as the false philosophers did, is vanity.

### Latin text

Si ergo nos uirtus uera delectat, ei dicamus, quod in eius sacris litteris legimus: Diligam te, domine, uirtus mea, et, si uere beati esse uolumus, quod nolle non possumus, id, quod in eisdem litteris didicimus, fido corde teneamus: Beatus uir, cuius est nomen domini spes eius et non respexit in uanitates et insanias mendaces. quanta est autem uanitas, quanta insania quantumque mendacium hominem mortalem aerumnosam uitam mutabili et spiritu et carne ducentem, tot peccatis oneratum, tot temptationibus subditum, tot corruptionibus obnoxium poenisque iustissimis destinatum se ipso fidere, ut beatus sit, quando ne illud quidem, quod habet in naturae suae dignitate praecipuum, id est mentem atque rationem potest uindicare ab erroribus, nisi deus adsit lux mentium! abiciamus itaque, obsecro te, falsorum philosophorum uanitates et insanias mendaces, quia nec uirtus nobis erit, nisi adsit ipse, quo iuuemur, nec beatitudo, nisi adsit ipse, quo fruamur, et totum mutabile atque corruptibile nostrum, quod per se ipsum inbecillum et quaedam materies miseriarum est, dono inmortalitatis atque incorruptionis absorbeat.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, true virtue delights us, let us say to him what we read in his sacred writings: "I will love you, O Lord, my strength"; and if we wish to be truly happy, which we cannot not wish, let us hold with faithful heart what we have learned in the same writings: "Blessed is the man whose hope is the name of the Lord, and who has not looked to vanities and lying follies." But how great is the vanity, how great the folly, and how great the lie, that a mortal man, leading a toilsome life with changeable spirit and flesh, burdened with so many sins, subject to so many temptations, liable to so many corruptions, and destined for most just punishments, should trust in himself in order to be happy, when he cannot even claim from errors that which is chief in the dignity of his nature, namely mind and reason, unless God, the light of minds, is present! Let us cast away, then, I beg you, the vanities and lying follies of false philosophers, since we shall neither have virtue unless he himself is present to help us, nor happiness unless he himself is present for us to enjoy, and he swallows up all that is changeable and corruptible in us, which of itself is weak and a kind of material of miseries, by the gift of immortality and incorruption.

### Scripture references

- Ps 18:1 (17:2 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 40:4 (39:5 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 18:1 (17:2 Vulgate); Ps 40:4 (39:5 Vulgate); 1 Cor 15:53–54 (echo). "Virtue" and "strength" both render uirtus; the psalm verse plays on the word.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.6 (CSEL 44:436–437; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-6).

## Letter 155.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-7
- Source: CSEL 44:437–438
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Psalm 144 shows that a city's happiness, like a man's, comes from having the Lord as its God, not from earthly prosperity.

### Latin text

Quoniam uero te rei publicae scimus amatorem, non aliunde esse beatum hominem, aliunde ciuitatem uide quam sit in illis sacris litteris clarum. nam quidam in eis sancto spiritu plenus haec loquitur orans: Exime me de manu filiorum alienorum, quorum os locutum est uanitatem et dextera eorum dextera iniquitatis; quorum filii uelut nouellae constabilitae in iuuentute sua, filiae eorum compositae et ornatae sicut similitudo templi; cellaria eorum plena, eructantia ex hoc in hoc; oues eorum fecundae, multiplicantes in exitibus suis, boues eorum crassi. non est ruina maceriae nec transitus neque clamor in plateis eorum. beatum dixerunt populum, cui haec sunt; beatus populus, cuius dominus deus ipsius.

### English translation (Claude)

But since we know you to be a lover of the commonwealth, see how clear it is in those sacred writings that a man is not happy from one source and a city from another. For in them someone filled with the Holy Spirit says this in prayer: "Rescue me from the hand of strange children, whose mouth has spoken vanity and their right hand is a right hand of iniquity; whose sons are like young plants established in their youth, their daughters adorned and decked like the likeness of a temple; their storehouses full, overflowing from this to that; their sheep fruitful, multiplying in their goings forth; their oxen fat. There is no breach of the wall, nor passage, nor outcry in their streets. They have called the people happy who have these things; happy is the people whose God is the Lord."

### Scripture references

- Ps 144:11 (143:11 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 144:12 (143:12 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 144:13 (143:13 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 144:14 (143:14 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 144:15 (143:15 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 144:11–15 (143:11–15 Vulgate), in the Old Latin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.7 (CSEL 44:437–438; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-7).

## Letter 155.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-8
- Source: CSEL 44:438–439
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The psalm rejects both earthly prosperity and self-reliant virtue as the source of happiness, placing it in having the Lord as God.

### Latin text

Vides exaggeratione terrenae felicitatis beatum populum non dici nisi a filiis alienis, id est non pertinentibus ad regenerationem, qua efficimur filii dei, a quorum manu iste se eximi precatur, ne ab eis in hanc opinionem atque in peccata impia pertrahatur. loquendo quippe uanitatem beatum dixerunt populum, cui haec sunt, quae supra commemorauit, quibus ea felicitas constat, quam solam dilectores mundi huius inquirunt. et ideo dextera eorum dextera iniquitatis, quia haec praeposuerunt, quae fuerant postponenda, sicut sinistrae praeponitur dextera. si enim habentur, non in eis beata uita ponenda est; subdita debent esse non praedita, sequentia non ducentia. huic autem, qui sic orabat et a filiis alienis, qui beatum dixerunt populum, cui haec sunt, eximi discernique cupiebat, tamquam diceremus: Ipse quid sentis? quem beatum populum dicis? non ait: Beatus populus, cuius est uirtus animi eius. quod si dixisset, discreuisset quidem etiam istum populum ab illo, qui beatam uitam in ista uisibili et corporali felicitate constituit, sed nondum transcendisset omnes uanitates et insanias mendaces. maledictus enim omnis, sicut alibi eaedem litterae docent, qui spem suam ponit in homine; ergo nec in se ipso quisque debet, quia et ipse homo est. proinde ut transiret omnium uanitatum et insaniarum mendacium limites atque ibi beatam uitam poneret, ubi uere est, beatus, inquit, populus, cuius dominus deus ipsius.

### English translation (Claude)

You see that a people is called happy for heaping up earthly prosperity only by the strange children, that is, by those who do not belong to the regeneration by which we are made sons of God; from whose hand the psalmist prays to be rescued, lest he be drawn by them into this opinion and into impious sins. For speaking vanity, they called the people happy who have the things he mentioned above, in which consists that prosperity which alone the lovers of this world seek. And therefore their right hand is a right hand of iniquity, because they have put first what ought to have been put after, as the right hand is preferred to the left. For if these things are possessed, the happy life is not to be placed in them; they ought to be subordinate, not in charge; following, not leading. Now to this man who prayed thus and desired to be rescued and separated from the strange children who called the people happy who have these things, suppose we said: "What do you yourself think? Which people do you call happy?" He does not say: "Happy is the people whose strength is the virtue of its own mind." Had he said that, he would indeed have distinguished this people from the one which places the happy life in this visible and bodily prosperity, but he would not yet have transcended all vanities and lying follies. For "cursed is everyone," as the same writings teach elsewhere, "who places his hope in man"; therefore no one ought to place it in himself, since he too is a man. Accordingly, in order to pass beyond the bounds of all vanities and lying follies and to place the happy life where it truly is, he said: "Happy is the people whose God is the Lord."

### Scripture references

- Ps 144:11 (143:11 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 144:15 (143:15 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Jer 17:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 40:4 (39:5 Vulg.): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 144:11, 15 (143 Vulgate); Jer 17:5; Ps 40:4 (39:5 Vulgate), echo.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.8 (CSEL 44:438–439; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-8).

## Letter 155.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-9
- Source: CSEL 44:439–440
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Both virtue and happiness must be asked of God, for the individual and for the city alike, since a city is only a harmonious multitude of people.

### Latin text

Cernis igitur, unde petendum sit, quod omnes docti indoctique desiderant et multi errando ac superbiendo, unde petatur et ubi accipiatur, ignorant. utrique autem in quodam diuino psalmo simul reprehenduntur, et qui confidunt in uirtute sua et qui in abundantia diuitiarum suarum gloriantur, id est et philosophi huius saeculi et abhorrentes uel a tali philosophia beatumque dicentes populum, cui suppetit terrena opulentia. ac per hoc a domino deo nostro, a quo facti sumus, et uirtutem petamus, qua huius uitae mala superemus, et beatam uitam, qua post istam uitam in eius aeternitate perfruamur, ut et in uirtute et in praemio uirtutis, sicut apostolus dicit, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur. hoc nobis uelimus, hoc ciuitati, cuius ciues sumus; non enim aliunde beata ciuitas, aliunde homo, cum aliud ciuitas non sit quam concors hominum multitudo.

### English translation (Claude)

You see, then, where we must seek what all, learned and unlearned, desire, and what many, through error and pride, do not know where to seek or where to receive. Both are rebuked together in a certain divine psalm: those who trust in their own strength and those who glory in the abundance of their riches, that is, both the philosophers of this world and those who shrink even from such philosophy and call the people happy which has earthly wealth in plenty. And therefore let us ask from the Lord our God, by whom we were made, both the virtue by which to overcome the evils of this life and the happy life by which to enjoy him in his eternity after this life, so that, both in virtue and in the reward of virtue, as the apostle says, "let him who glories glory in the Lord." This let us wish for ourselves, this for the city of which we are citizens; for a city is not happy from one source and a man from another, since a city is nothing else than a harmonious multitude of human beings.

### Scripture references

- Ps 49:6 (48:7 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 10:17: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 49:6 (48:7 Vulgate); 1 Cor 1:31 (2 Cor 10:17). Cf. Cicero, Rep. 1.39 and City of God 1.15 for the definition of a city.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.9 (CSEL 44:439–440; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-9).

## Letter 155.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-10
- Source: CSEL 44:440–441
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Macedonius's civic virtues are not true virtues if they aim only at people's earthly security and not at their worship of the true God.

### Latin text

Itaque si omnis prudentia tua, qua consulere conaris rebus humanis, si omnis fortitudo, qua nullius iniquitate aduersante terreris, si omnis temperantia, qua in tanta labe nequissimae consuetudinis hominum te a corruptionibus abstines, si omnis iustitia, qua recte iudicando sua cuique distribuis, id laborat, id nititur, ut hi, quibus uis ut bene sit, salui sint corpore et ab omni cuiusquam inprobitate tuti atque pacati habeant filios sicut nouellas constabilitas, filias ornatas sicut similitudinem templi, cellaria plena eructantia ex hoc in hoc, fecundas oues, crassos boues nec maceriae ruina deformet praedium nec litigantium clamor personet in plateis eorum, ita non erunt uerae uirtutes tuae sicut nec istorum beatitudo. hic enim ad uerum dicendum illa mea uerecundia, quam in tua epistula benigno sermone laudasti, me impedire non debet. si quaelibet, inquam, administratio tua illis, quas commemoraui, instructa uirtutibus hoc intentionis fine determinatur, ut homines secundum carnem nullas iniquas molestias patiantur, nec ad te existimas pertinere, quo istam quietem, quam praestare niteris, referant, id est, ut uerbis non ambiam, quo modo deum uerum, ubi est quietae uitae omnis fructus, colant, nihil tibi prodest ad uitam uere beatam tantus labor.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, if all your prudence, by which you try to provide for human affairs; all your fortitude, by which you are terrified by no one's opposing iniquity; all your temperance, by which, amid such a great plague of the most wicked custom of men, you keep yourself from corruption; all your justice, by which, judging rightly, you give each his own, labor and strive for this alone, that those whom you wish to be well off may be safe in body, secure from anyone's dishonesty, and at peace, may have sons like young plants established, daughters adorned like the likeness of a temple, storehouses full and overflowing from this to that, fruitful sheep, fat oxen, no breach of the wall disfiguring their estate, no outcry of litigants sounding in their streets, then your virtues will not be true, just as their happiness will not be. For here that modesty of mine, which you praised so kindly in your letter, must not prevent me from speaking the truth. If, I say, your whole administration, equipped with the virtues I have mentioned, is bounded by this end of its intention, that people should suffer no unjust troubles according to the flesh, and you do not think it your concern to what end they refer this quiet which you strive to provide, that is (not to beat about the bush), how they worship the true God, in whom is all the fruit of a quiet life, then all this great labor profits you nothing for the truly happy life.

### Scripture references

- Ps 144:12 (143:12 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 144:13 (143:13 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 144:14 (143:14 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 144:12–14 (143 Vulgate), echoing 155.7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.10 (CSEL 44:440–441; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-10).

## Letter 155.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-11
- Source: CSEL 44:441
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that friendship requires him to admonish Macedonius freely, though he speaks with the modesty Macedonius praised.

### Latin text

Inuerecundius hoc dicere uideor et oblitus quodam modo consuetudinem intercessionum mearum. sed si nihil est uerecundia nisi quidam displicendi metus, ego in hac causa metuendo non uereor. metuo enim, ne primum deo deinde ipsi amicitiae, quam mecum inire dignatus es, iure displiceam, si minus liber in admonendo fuero, quod me admonere saluberrime existimo. sim certe uerecundior, cum tibi pro aliis intercedo, cum uero pro te ipso, tanto liberior quanto amicior, quia tanto amicior quanto fidelior; quamquam haec ipsa non dicerem, nisi uerecundius agerem. quae si maxima est, ut ipse scripsisti, difficilium inter bonos efficacia, adiuuet me pro te apud te, ut in illo te fruar, qui mihi hanc ad te ianuam fiduciamque praestitit, praesertim quia id, quod suggero, iam facile esse arbitror animo tuo tot diuinis muneribus adminiculato et instructo.

### English translation (Claude)

I seem to say this too immodestly, and as it were to have forgotten the custom of my intercessions. But if modesty is nothing but a certain fear of displeasing, in this case I am not modest because I fear. For I fear that I would justly displease first God, then the very friendship which you have deigned to enter with me, if I were less free in admonishing you about what I think it most wholesome to admonish. Let me indeed be more modest when I intercede with you for others, but when I do so for you yourself, the freer the more friendly I am, because the more friendly the more faithful; although I would not say these very things unless I were acting modestly. If modesty is, as you yourself wrote, "the most effective means among good men in difficult matters," let it help me with you on your behalf, so that I may enjoy you in him who gave me this door and this confidence toward you, especially since I think that what I suggest is already easy for your mind, supported and equipped with so many divine gifts.

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Macedonius, Ep. 154.1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.11 (CSEL 44:441; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-11).

## Letter 155.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-12
- Source: CSEL 44:441–443
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Civic virtues become true when referred to the worship of God, and in eternal life the four virtues will be one: clinging to God.

### Latin text

Si enim uirtutes, quas accepisti, a quo acceperis, sentiens eique gratias agens eas ad ipsius cultum etiam in tuis istis saecularibus honoribus conferas tuaeque potestati subditos homines ad eum colendum et exemplo religiosae tuae uitae et ipso studio consulendi seu fouendo seu terrendo erigas et adducas nihilque aliud in eo, quod per te securius uiuunt, uelis, nisi ut hinc illum promereantur, apud quem beate uiuent, et uerae illae uirtutes erunt et illius opitulatione, cuius largitate donatae sunt, ita crescent et perficientur, ut te ad uitam uere beatam, quae non nisi aeterna est, sine ulla dubitatione perducant, ubi iam nec prudenter discernantur a bonis mala, quae non erunt, nec fortiter tolerentur aduersa, quia non ibi erit, nisi quod amemus, non etiam, quod toleremus, nec temperanter libido frenetur, ubi nulla eius incitamenta sentiemus, nec iuste subueniatur ope indigentibus, ubi inopem atque indiguum non habebimus. una ibi uirtus erit et id ipsum erit uirtus praemiumque uirtutis, quod dicit in sanctis eloquiis homo, qui hoc amat: Mihi autem adhaerere deo bonum est. haec ibi erit plena et sempiterna sapientia eademque uita ueraciter iam beata; peruentio quippe est ad aeternum ac summum bonum, cui adhaerere in aeternum est finis nostri boni. dicatur haec et prudentia, quia prospectissime adhaerebit bono, quod non amittatur, et fortitudo, quia firmissime adhaerebit bono, unde non auellatur, et temperantia, quia castissime adhaerebit bono, ubi non corrumpatur, et iustitia, quia rectissime adhaerebit bono, cui merito subiciatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For if, perceiving from whom you received the virtues you have received and giving thanks to him, you devote them to his worship even in these secular honors of yours, and raise up and lead the people subject to your power to worship him, both by the example of your religious life and by your very zeal for their good, whether by encouraging or by frightening them, and wish nothing else in their living more securely through you than that they may thereby win him with whom they will live happily, then those virtues will be true, and by the help of him by whose generosity they were given they will so grow and be perfected that they will bring you without any doubt to the truly happy life, which can only be eternal. There evils will no longer be prudently distinguished from goods, for there will be none; nor adversities bravely endured, for there will be nothing there but what we love, nothing that we must endure; nor lust temperately bridled, where we shall feel none of its incitements; nor the needy justly helped with aid, where we shall have no one poor or needy. There will be one virtue there, and the very same thing will be virtue and the reward of virtue, which the man who loves it speaks of in the holy oracles: "But for me it is good to cling to God." This there will be full and everlasting wisdom, and the same will be the life now truly happy; for it is the arrival at the eternal and highest good, to cling to which forever is the end of our good. Let this also be called prudence, because it will cling most foresightedly to a good that cannot be lost; and fortitude, because it will cling most firmly to a good from which it cannot be torn; and temperance, because it will cling most chastely to a good where it cannot be corrupted; and justice, because it will cling most rightly to a good to which it is deservedly subject.

### Scripture references

- Ps 73:28 (72:28 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 73:28 (72:28 Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.12 (CSEL 44:441–443; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-12).

## Letter 155.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-13
- Source: CSEL 44:443–444
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Virtue in this life is loving what ought to be loved, above all God, to whom we go not by walking but by loving.

### Latin text

Quamquam et in hac uita uirtus non est nisi diligere, quod diligendum est; id eligere prudentia est, nullis inde auerti molestiis fortitudo est, nullis inlecebris temperantia est, nulla superbia iustitia est. quid autem eligamus, quod praecipue diligamus, nisi quo nihil melius inuenimus? hoc deus est, cui si aliquid diligendo uel praeponimus uel aequamus, nos ipsos diligere nescimus. tanto enim nobis melius est, quanto magis in illum imus, quo nihil melius est. imus autem non ambulando sed amando. quem tanto habebimus praesentiorem, quanto eundem amorem, quo in eum tendimus, potuerimus habere puriorem; non enim locis corporalibus uel extenditur uel includitur. ad eum ergo, qui ubique praesens est et ubique totus, non pedibus licet ire sed moribus. mores autem nostri non ex eo, quod quisque nouit, sed ex eo, quod diligit, diiudicari solent nec faciunt bonos uel malos mores nisi boni uel mali amores. prauitate ergo nostra a rectitudine dei longe sumus; unde rectum amando corrigimur, ut recto recti adhaerere possimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet even in this life virtue is nothing but loving what ought to be loved: to choose it is prudence; to be turned from it by no troubles is fortitude; by no allurements, temperance; by no pride, justice. But what should we choose to love above all, except that than which we find nothing better? This is God; and if in loving we put anything before him or on a level with him, we do not know how to love ourselves. For it is the better for us, the more we go toward him than whom nothing is better. And we go not by walking but by loving. We shall have him the more present, the purer we can make that very love by which we tend toward him; for he is neither extended nor enclosed in bodily places. To him, then, who is everywhere present and everywhere whole, one may go not with feet but with conduct. And our conduct is usually judged not by what each knows but by what he loves; and only good or bad loves make good or bad conduct. By our crookedness, then, we are far from God's rightness; hence by loving what is right we are corrected, so that, being right, we may cling to the Right.

### Translation notes

- "Conduct" renders mores, which Augustine pairs with amores ("loves").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.13 (CSEL 44:443–444; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-13).

## Letter 155.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-14
- Source: CSEL 44:444–445
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love of neighbor extends to all human beings by the fellowship of nature, as even Terence's famous line, applauded in the theaters, shows.

### Latin text

Ad illum ergo, quanta opera possumus, etiam illi ut perueniant, agamus, quos tamquam nosmet ipsos diligimus, si nosmet ipsos diligere illum diligendo iam nouimus. Christus namque, id est ueritas dicit in his duobus praeceptis totam legem prophetasque pendere, ut diligamus deum ex toto corde et ex tota anima et ex tota mente et diligamus proximos tamquam nosmet ipsos. proximus sane hoc loco non sanguinis propinquitate sed rationis societate pensandus est, in qua socii sunt omnes homines. nam si pecuniae ratio socios facit, quanto magis ratio naturae non negotiandi sed nascendi lege communis! hinc et ille comicus, sicut luculentis ingeniis non defit resplendentia ueritatis, cum ab uno sene alteri seni dictum componeret: Tantumne ab re tua est oti tibi, Aliena ut cures ea, quae nihil ad te adtinent? responsum ab altero reddidit: Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto. cui sententiae ferunt etiam theatra tota plena stultis indoctisque plausisse. ita quippe affectum omnium naturaliter attigit humanorum societas animorum, ut nullus ibi hominum nisi cuiuslibet hominis proximum se esse sentiret.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us strive, then, with all the effort we can, that those too may come to him whom we love as ourselves, if we already know how to love ourselves by loving him. For Christ, that is, the Truth, says that on these two commandments hang the whole law and the prophets: that we love God with our whole heart and our whole soul and our whole mind, and love our neighbors as ourselves. "Neighbor" in this passage is to be reckoned not by kinship of blood but by fellowship of reason, in which all human beings are fellows. For if a reckoning of money makes partners, how much more the reckoning of nature, common by the law not of trading but of birth! Hence that comic poet too (for the brightness of truth is not lacking to splendid minds), when he composed a dialogue in which one old man said to another: "Have you so much leisure from your own affairs that you look after other people's, which do not concern you at all?", gave the other's answer: "I am a man; I consider nothing human foreign to me." They say that whole theaters full of foolish and unlearned people applauded this sentence. So naturally did the fellowship of human souls touch the feelings of all, that no one there felt himself anything but the neighbor of any human being.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 22:39: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Haut. 75–77 (Terence): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 22:37–40. Terence, Heauton Timorumenos 75–77.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.14 (CSEL 44:444–445; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-14).

## Letter 155.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-15
- Source: CSEL 44:445–446
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There are only two great commandments because one loves oneself rightly only by loving God; love of neighbor means leading others to worship God.

### Latin text

Cum ergo illa dilectione, quam diuina lex imperat, debeat homo diligere deum et se ipsum et proximum, non tamen ex hoc tria praecepta data sunt nec dictum est in his tribus sed: In his duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet et prophetae, id est in dilectione dei ex toto corde et ex tota anima et ex tota mente et proximi tamquam sui ipsius, uidelicet ut intellegeretur nullam esse aliam dilectionem, qua quisque diligit se ipsum, nisi quod diligit deum. qui enim aliter se diligit, potius se odisse dicendus est; fit quippe iniquus priuaturque luce iustitiae, cum a potiore ac praestantiore bono auersus atque inde uel ad se ipsum conuersus ad inferiora et egena conuertitur fitque in ipso, quod ueracissime scriptum est: Qui autem amat iniquitatem, odit animam suam. quia igitur nemo nisi deum diligendo diligit se ipsum, non opus erat, ut dato de dei dilectione praecepto etiam se ipsum homo diligere iuberetur, cum in eo diligat se ipsum, quod diligit deum. debet ergo et deum diligere et proximum tamquam se ipsum, ut quem potuerit hominem uel beneficentiae consolatione uel informatione doctrinae uel disciplinae cohercitione adducat ad colendum deum, sciens in his duobus praeceptis totam legem prophetasque pendere.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, with that love which the divine law commands, a man ought to love God and himself and his neighbor, yet three commandments were not given on this account, nor was it said "on these three," but "on these two commandments hang the whole law and the prophets," that is, on love of God with the whole heart, the whole soul, and the whole mind, and of the neighbor as oneself; evidently so that it might be understood that there is no other love by which anyone loves himself except his loving God. For whoever loves himself otherwise should rather be said to hate himself; for he becomes unjust and is deprived of the light of justice when, turned away from the better and more excellent good, and turned even toward himself, he is turned toward lower and needy things, and there is fulfilled in him what is most truly written: "But he who loves iniquity hates his own soul." Because, then, no one loves himself except by loving God, there was no need, when the commandment of love of God had been given, for a man to be commanded also to love himself, since in loving God he loves himself. He ought, then, to love both God and his neighbor as himself, so that he may lead whatever human being he can to worship God, whether by the consolation of kindness, by instruction in doctrine, or by the restraint of discipline, knowing that on these two commandments hang the whole law and the prophets.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:40: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:37: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 11:5 (10:6 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 22:37–40; Ps 11:5 (10:6 Vulgate/LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.15 (CSEL 44:445–446; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-15).

## Letter 155.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-16
- Source: CSEL 44:446–447
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The virtues are given by God through Christ the mediator; the saints are called happy amid torments only in hope of their eternal goal.

### Latin text

Hoc qui sobria discretione eligit, prudens est; qui nulla hinc afflictione auertitur, fortis est, qui nulla alia delectatione, temperans est, qui nulla elatione, iustus est. his uirtutibus diuinitus impertitis per gratiam mediatoris dei cum patre et nobiscum hominis Christi Iesu, per quem post inimicitias iniquitatis reconciliamur deo in spiritu caritatis, his, inquam, uirtutibus diuinitus impertitis et bona uita nunc agitur et postea praemium eius, quae nisi aeterna esse non potest, beata uita persoluitur. hic enim sunt eaedem uirtutes in actu, ibi in effectu, hic in opere, ibi in mercede, hic in officio, ibi in fine. itaque omnes boni et sancti etiam in tormentis quibuslibet diuino fulti adiutorio spe illius finis beati uocantur, quo fine beati erunt; nam si in eisdem tormentis et atrocissimis doloribus semper essent, cum quibuslibet uirtutibus eos esse miseros nulla sana ratio dubitaret.

### English translation (Claude)

He who chooses this with sober discernment is prudent; he who is turned from it by no affliction is brave; by no other delight, temperate; by no pride, just. By these virtues, imparted by God through the grace of the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who is God with the Father and man with us, through whom after the enmities of iniquity we are reconciled to God in the Spirit of love; by these virtues, I say, imparted by God, a good life is now led, and afterward its reward is paid, the happy life, which can only be eternal. For here these same virtues are in action, there in effect; here in work, there in wages; here in duty, there in goal. Therefore all the good and holy, even in any torments whatever, supported by divine help, are called happy in the hope of that goal, in which they will be happy; for if they were always in those same torments and most atrocious pains, no sound reason would doubt that they were miserable, whatever virtues they had.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:10: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 2:5; Rom 5:10 (echo). The Latin "dei cum patre et nobiscum hominis" (God with the Father and man with us) qualifies the mediator.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.16 (CSEL 44:446–447; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-16).

## Letter 155.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-17
- Source: CSEL 44:447–448
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine exhorts Macedonius to piety, noting that his edict calling the Donatists back to unity already shows concern for the heavenly commonwealth.

### Latin text

Pietas igitur, id est uerus ueri dei cultus ad omnia prodest, et quae molestias huius uitae auertat aut leniat et quae ad illam uitam salutemque perducat, ubi nec aliquid iam mali patiamur et bono summo sempiternoque perfruamur. ad hanc te perfectius adsequendam et perseuerantissime retinendam exhortor ut me ipsum, cuius nisi iam particeps esses tuosque istos honores temporales ei seruire oportere iudicares, non Donatistis haereticis ad eos in unitatem Christi pacemque redigendos per edictum diceres: Pro uobis hoc agitur; pro uobis sacerdotes incorruptae fidei, pro uobis imperator Augustus, pro uobis nos quoque eius iudices laboramus et alia multa, quae in eodem edicto ita posuisti, ut te appareat in terreni iudicis cingulo non parua ex parte caelestem rem publicam cogitare. quare si de ueris uirtutibus et uera beata uita uolui diutius loqui tecum, quaeso, ne onerosus deputer occupationibus tuis, immo uero me non esse confido, quando tu adeo magnum animum et mirabiliter laudandum geris, ut nec illas curas deseras et his libentius ac familiarius occuperis.

### English translation (Claude)

Piety, then, that is, the true worship of the true God, is profitable for all things, both for averting or lessening the troubles of this life and for leading to that life and salvation where we shall suffer no more evil and shall enjoy the highest and everlasting good. To attain this more perfectly and to keep it most perseveringly I exhort you, as I do myself. Unless you already shared in it and judged that these temporal honors of yours ought to serve it, you would not have said to the Donatist heretics in an edict meant to bring them back into the unity and peace of Christ: "This is done for your sake; for your sake the priests of incorrupt faith, for your sake the emperor Augustus, for your sake we his judges also labor," and much else which you put in the same edict in such a way that it is evident that, in the belt of an earthly judge, you are thinking in no small measure of the heavenly commonwealth. So if I have wished to speak at greater length with you about true virtues and the true happy life, I ask that I not be thought burdensome to your occupations; indeed, I am confident that I am not, since you have so great and so wonderfully praiseworthy a mind that you neither abandon those cares and are more gladly and more familiarly occupied with these.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 4:8. Macedonius's edict against the Donatists (ca. 414) is quoted; the coercion of the Donatists is reported as Augustine writes it. The digital text opens a parenthesis before the quotation and does not close it. The "belt" (cingulum) was the insignia of imperial office.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 155.17 (CSEL 44:447–448; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-155-17).

## Letter 156.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-156-1
- Source: CSEL 44:448–449
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary, a layman of Syracuse, asks Augustine about Pelagian teachings circulating there: sinlessness, unbaptized infants, riches, oaths, and the spotless church.

### Latin text

Sanctitatis tuae gratia, quae omnibus nota est, paruitati meae persuasit, ut nostris de Syracusano ad Hipponem remeantibus has ad laudandam mihi uenerabilitatem tuam litteras erogarem poscens summam trinitatem, ut incolumis et uegetus dei nostri fauore hoc meum scriptum ad recensendum suscipias, domine sancte, iure ac merito uenerabilis et per omnia colende. proinde rogo, ut mei memor in sanctis orationibus tuis esse digneris atque inperitiam nostram informare de eo, quod quidam Christiani apud Syracusas exponunt dicentes posse esse hominem sine peccato et mandata dei facile custodire, si uelit; infantem non baptizatum morte praeuentum non posse perire merito, quoniam sine peccato nascitur; diuitem manentem in diuitiis suis regnum dei non posse ingredi, nisi omnia sua uendiderit, nec prodesse eidem posse, si forte ex ipsis diuitiis fecerit mandata; non debere iurare omnino; et de ecclesia, quae sit, de qua scriptum est non habere rugam neque maculam, utrum haec sit, in qua nunc congregamur, an illa, quam speramus; quidam autem posuit ecclesiam hanc esse, in qua nunc frequentamus populos, et sine peccato esse non posse. de his omnibus, rogo quantis ualeo precibus sanctitatem tuam, ut iubeas nos apertius instrui, quo nouerimus, quatenus sentire debeamus. dei nostri misericordia sanctitatem tuam incolumem conseruet annis innumeris, opto, domine sancte, iure ac merito uenerabilis et per omnia colende.

### English translation (Claude)

The grace of your Holiness, which is known to all, has persuaded my littleness, as our people were returning from Syracuse to Hippo, to dispatch this letter to commend myself to your Reverence, asking the supreme Trinity that, safe and vigorous by the favor of our God, you may receive this writing of mine to read, holy lord, rightly and deservedly venerable and to be honored in all things. Accordingly, I ask that you deign to remember me in your holy prayers and to instruct our ignorance concerning what certain Christians at Syracuse set forth, saying: that a man can be without sin and keep the commandments of God easily, if he wishes; that an unbaptized infant overtaken by death cannot deservedly perish, since it is born without sin; that a rich man who remains in his riches cannot enter the kingdom of God unless he has sold all he has, and that it cannot profit him if he has kept the commandments with those riches; that one ought not to swear at all; and concerning the church, of which it is written that it has no wrinkle or spot, whether it is this one in which we now gather or the one we hope for. Someone, however, maintained that the church is this one in which we now assemble with the people, and that it cannot be without sin. On all these matters I ask your Holiness, with all the prayers I can, to have us instructed more clearly, so that we may know how far we ought to hold. May the mercy of our God keep your Holiness safe for countless years, I pray, holy lord, rightly and deservedly venerable and to be honored in all things.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:21: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:34: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Hilary of Syracuse to Augustine (ca. 414); Augustine replies in Ep. 157. Scripture: Matt 19:21; Matt 5:34; Eph 5:27. The opinions listed are those Augustine attributes to the Pelagians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 156.1 (CSEL 44:448–449; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-156-1).

## Letter 157.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-1
- Source: CSEL 44:449
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins his reply to Hilary of Syracuse on the questions raised by Pelagian teaching.

### Latin text

Ex litteris tuis didici non solum incolumitatem tuam sed etiam religiosum studium circa uerbum dei et piam curam pro salute tua, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. unde gratias deo agens non distuli rescripta persoluere.

### English translation (Claude)

From your letter I have learned not only of your safety but also of your religious zeal for the word of God and your godly concern for your salvation, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Giving thanks to God for this, I have not delayed to send my reply.

### Translation notes

- Reply to Hilary of Syracuse (Ep. 156), ca. 414.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.1 (CSEL 44:449; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-1).

## Letter 157.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-2
- Source: CSEL 44:449–450
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: No one in this life is without sin, as 1 John, the Lord's Prayer, and Daniel's confession show.

### Latin text

Si ergo quaeris, utrum in hac uita quisquam ita iustitiae perfectione proficiat, ut hic sine ullo uiuat omnino peccato, adtende, quid dixerit Iohannes apostolus, quem dominus inter discipulos suos praecipue diligebat: Si dixerimus, inquit, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est. si ergo illi, de quibus mihi scripsisti, se dicunt esse sine peccato, uides, quia se ipsos decipiunt et ueritas in eis non est. si autem se esse peccatores fatentur, ut dei misericordiam possint mereri, compescant se etiam ab aliis decipiendis, quibus hanc superbiam persuadere conantur. omnibus enim necessaria est oratio dominica, quam etiam ipsis arietibus gregis, id est apostolis suis dominus dedit, ut unusquisque deo dicat: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. cui enim haec uerba in oratione non fuerint necessaria, ipse hic sine peccato uiuere pronuntiandus est. quales si aliquos futuros dominus praeuideret meliores utique, quam extiterunt eius apostoli, aliam orationem illos doceret, qua non peterent dimitti sibi peccata, quibus in baptismo fuerant omnia iam dimissa. nam si Danihel sanctus non coram hominibus quasi humilitate fallaci sed coram deo, id est in oratione, qua deum precabatur, non solum peccata populi sui sed etiam sua confitebatur, sicut eius ore ueridico expressum est, nihil aliud mihi uidetur dicendum istis, nisi quod per prophetam Ezechielem cuidam superbo dominus mandat: Numquid tu sapientior quam Danihel?

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, you ask whether anyone in this life advances in the perfection of righteousness so far as to live here entirely without any sin, consider what the apostle John said, whom the Lord especially loved among his disciples: "If we say," he says, "that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." If, then, those about whom you wrote to me say that they are without sin, you see that they deceive themselves and the truth is not in them. But if they confess that they are sinners, so that they may obtain God's mercy, let them also refrain from deceiving others, whom they try to persuade of this pride. For the Lord's Prayer is necessary for all; the Lord gave it even to the very rams of the flock, that is, to his apostles, so that each might say to God: "Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors." Anyone for whom these words in the prayer were not necessary would have to be declared to live here without sin. If the Lord had foreseen that there would be any such people, certainly better than his apostles were, he would have taught them another prayer, in which they would not ask for the forgiveness of sins, all of which had already been forgiven them in baptism. For if holy Daniel, not before men with a deceitful humility but before God, that is, in the prayer in which he besought God, confessed not only the sins of his people but also his own, as was expressed by his truthful mouth, nothing else seems to me to need saying to these people than what the Lord says through the prophet Ezekiel to a certain proud man: "Are you wiser than Daniel?"

### Scripture references

- John 13:23: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 John 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:20: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 28:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 13:23; 1 John 1:8; Matt 6:12; Dan 9:20; Ezek 28:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.2 (CSEL 44:449–450; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-2).

## Letter 157.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-3
- Source: CSEL 44:450–451
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who avoid grave crimes and cleanse daily sins by mercy and prayer will die free of sin, but sinlessness cannot be an excuse for license.

### Latin text

Sed plane, qui misericordia dei adiutus et gratia se ab eis peccatis abstinuerit, quae etiam crimina nominantur, atque illa peccata, sine quibus non hic uiuitur, mundare operibus misericordiae et piis orationibus non neglexerit, merebitur hinc exire sine peccato, quamuis, cum hic uiueret, habuerit nonnulla peccata, quia, sicut ista non defuerunt, ita etiam remedia, quibus purgarentur, adfuerunt. quisquis autem hac uelut occasione comperta, cum audierit neminem hic arbitrio suo sine peccato uiuere, dederit se libidinibus et criminibus nefariis obligauerit atque in his criminosis consceleratisque moribus usque in diem suum ultimum perdurauerit, quaslibet inter haec elemosynas faciat, et infeliciter ducit uitam et infelicius finit.

### English translation (Claude)

But plainly, whoever, helped by God's mercy and grace, abstains from those sins which are also called crimes, and does not neglect to cleanse by works of mercy and godly prayers those sins without which one does not live here, will deserve to depart from here without sin, although while he lived here he had some sins; because, just as these were not lacking, so the remedies by which they could be purged were also present. But whoever, having found this as it were an occasion, on hearing that no one lives here without sin by his own choice, gives himself up to lusts, binds himself with heinous crimes, and continues in these criminal and wicked ways to his last day, whatever alms he may give in the meantime, both lives unhappily and ends more unhappily.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.3 (CSEL 44:450–451; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-3).

## Letter 157.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-4
- Source: CSEL 44:451
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The claim that free will suffices to keep God's commandments without grace and the Holy Spirit must be anathematized.

### Latin text

Sed isti utcumque tolerandi sunt, quando dicunt uel esse uel fuisse hic aliquem iustum praeter unum sanctum sanctorum, qui nullum haberet omnino peccatum. illud uero, quod dicunt sufficere homini liberum arbitrium ad dominica implenda mandata, etiam si dei gratia et sancti spiritus dono ad opera bona non adiuuetur, omni modo anathemandum est et omnibus eiecrationibus detestandum. qui enim hoc adserunt, a gratia dei penitus alieni sunt, quia ignorantes dei iustitiam, sicut de Iudaeis dicit apostolus, et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. plenitudo quippe legis non est nisi caritas et utique caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris non per nos ipsos nec uiribus propriae uoluntatis sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

But these people are in some way to be tolerated when they say that there is or has been someone righteous here, besides the one Holy of holies, who had no sin at all. But what they say, that free choice suffices for a man to fulfill the Lord's commandments even if he is not helped toward good works by God's grace and the gift of the Holy Spirit, must be anathematized in every way and detested with every execration. For those who assert this are wholly strangers to the grace of God, because, as the apostle says of the Jews, "being ignorant of the righteousness of God and seeking to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God." For the fullness of the law is nothing but love, and certainly "the love of God has been poured into our hearts," not through ourselves or by the powers of our own will, but "through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us."

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:24: echo, low confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Dan 9:24 ("Holy of holies", echo); Rom 10:3; Rom 13:10; Rom 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.4 (CSEL 44:451; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-4).

## Letter 157.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-5
- Source: CSEL 44:451–452
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Free will avails for good only with God's help, as the petition "Lead us not into temptation" and 1 Cor 10:13 show.

### Latin text

Valet itaque liberum arbitrium ad opera bona, si diuinitus adiuuetur, quod fit humiliter petendo et fatendo; desertum uero diuino adiutorio, qualibet scientia legis excellat, nullo modo habebit iustitiae soliditatem sed inflationem impiae superbiae et exitiosum tumorem. docet hoc eadem ipsa dominica oratio. frustra enim deum rogantes dicimus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, si hoc sic in nostra positum est potestate, ut nullo illius adiutorio id ualeamus implere. dictum est enim: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, quod intellegitur: Ne nos inferri deserendo permittas. fidelis enim deus, ait apostolus, qui non uos permittat temptari super id, quod potestis, sed faciet cum temptatione etiam exitum, ut possitis sustinere. ut quid hoc dixit deum facere, si hoc sine ipsius adiutorio in sola nostra est potestate?

### English translation (Claude)

Free choice, then, has power for good works if it is helped by God, which comes about by humbly asking and confessing; but deserted by divine help, however much it excels in knowledge of the law, it will in no way have the solidity of righteousness, but the inflation of impious pride and a deadly swelling. The Lord's Prayer itself teaches this. For we say to God in vain, "Lead us not into temptation," if this has been placed in our power in such a way that we can accomplish it without any help from him. For it is said, "Lead us not into temptation," which is understood as: "Do not, by deserting us, allow us to be led into it." For "God is faithful," says the apostle, "who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will also make a way out, so that you may be able to endure." Why did he say that God does this, if it lies in our power alone without his help?

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 6:13; 1 Cor 10:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.5 (CSEL 44:451–452; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/155-1/#p-157-5).

## Letter 157.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-6
- Source: CSEL 44:452–453
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law shows what grace must give; those who rely on the law without grace repeat the error Paul ascribes to the Jews and seek to kill Christ's grace.

### Latin text

Nam et ipsa lex in hoc adiutorium data est illis, qui ea legitime utuntur, ut per illam sciant, uel quid iustitiae iam acceperint, unde gratias agant, uel quid eis adhuc desit, quod instanter petant. qui autem sic audiunt, quod ait lex: Non concupisces, ut hoc quia didicerunt, sufficere sibi arbitrentur nec adiutorio gratiae dei ad faciendum, quod iussum est, dari sibi uirtutem credant et petant, ad hoc eis lex subintrauit, ut abundet delictum, quod dictum est de Iudaeis. parum est enim, quia non implent, quod praecepit lex: Non concupisces, sed insuper et superbiunt, ut ignorantes dei iustitiam, id est quam deus dat, qui iustificat impium, et suam uolentes constituere tamquam suae uoluntatis uiribus factam iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. finis enim legis Christus ad iustitiam omni credenti. qui utique ideo uenit, ut ubi abundauit delictum, superabundet gratia. cui gratiae si fuerunt inimici Iudaei ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere, quare sunt et isti, si in eum crediderunt, quem illi occiderunt? an ut illi accipiant praemium, qui occiso Christo suam impietatem accusauerunt et se illius gratiae cognitae subdiderunt, et isti portent iudicium, qui sic in Christum uolunt credere, ut eius ipsam gratiam conentur occidere?

### English translation (Claude)

For the law itself was given as a help to those who use it lawfully, so that through it they may know either what righteousness they have already received, for which to give thanks, or what is still lacking to them, for which to ask earnestly. But those who hear what the law says, "You shall not covet," in such a way that, because they have learned it, they think it sufficient for them, and do not believe and ask that strength be given them by the help of God's grace to do what is commanded, for them "the law came in so that the offense might abound," which was said of the Jews. For it is not enough that they do not fulfill what the law commanded, "You shall not covet"; they are proud besides, so that, "being ignorant of the righteousness of God," that is, the righteousness which God gives, who justifies the ungodly, "and seeking to establish their own," as if made by the strength of their own will, "they have not submitted to the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes." He certainly came for this, that "where the offense abounded, grace might superabound." If the Jews were enemies of this grace, being ignorant of the righteousness of God and seeking to establish their own, why are these people so too, if they have believed in him whom the Jews killed? Or is it so that those may receive a reward who, after Christ was killed, accused their own impiety and submitted to his grace once known, while these bear judgment who wish to believe in Christ in such a way as to try to kill his very grace?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 1:8: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 1:8; Exod 20:17 (Rom 7:7); Rom 5:20; Rom 4:5; Rom 10:3–4. The comparison with "the Jews" follows Paul's Romans and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.6 (CSEL 44:452–453; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-6).

## Letter 157.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-7
- Source: CSEL 44:453–454
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Believers hunger for righteousness and seek Christ the physician; those who deny the need of grace are like the delirious who beat their doctor.

### Latin text

Ad hoc quippe in eum credunt, qui recte credunt, ut esuriant sitiantque iustitiam et eius gratia saturentur. omnis enim, sicut scriptum est, qui inuocauerit nomen domini saluus erit non utique salute corporis, quam multi habent, et qui non inuocant nomen domini, sed illa salute, de qua ipse dicit: Non est opus sanis medicus sed aegrotantibus; et, quid dixerit, consequenter exponens: Non ueni, inquit, uocare iustos sed peccatores. iustos ergo sanos, peccatores autem dixit aegrotos. non itaque de suis uiribus praesumat aegrotus, quia in multitudine uirtutis suae non erit saluus. nam si inde praesumit, uideat, ne uires istae non sint, quales solent esse sanorum, sed quales solent esse phreneticorum; qui cum sint insani, ad hoc se sanos putant, ut nec medicum quaerant et tamquam importunum insuper caedant, sicut isti Christum insana superbia quodam modo caedunt, cuius gratiae tam benignum adiutorium ad faciendam iustitiam dato legis praecepto necessarium non esse contendunt. desinant ergo sic insanire et ad hoc se intellegant habere, quantum possunt, liberum arbitrium, non ut superba uoluntate respuant adiutorium, sed ut pia uoluntate inuocent dominum.

### English translation (Claude)

For those who believe rightly believe in him for this purpose, that they may hunger and thirst for righteousness and be filled by his grace. For, as it is written, "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved," certainly not with bodily health, which many have even who do not call on the name of the Lord, but with that salvation of which he himself says: "It is not the healthy who need a physician but the sick"; and, explaining what he meant, he goes on: "I came," he says, "not to call the righteous but sinners." He called the righteous healthy, then, and sinners sick. Let the sick man not presume on his own strength, then, because "by the abundance of his strength he will not be saved." For if he presumes on it, let him beware lest that strength be not such as the healthy usually have, but such as the delirious usually have, who, though they are insane, think themselves healthy to the point of not seeking a physician, and even beating him as a nuisance; just as these people, with insane pride, in a way beat Christ, contending that the so kind help of his grace is not necessary for doing righteousness once the precept of the law has been given. Let them stop being insane in this way, then, and understand that they have free choice, as far as they can, not to reject help with a proud will but to call upon the Lord with a godly will.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Joel 2:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 33:16 (32:16 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 5:6; Joel 2:32 (Rom 10:13); Matt 9:12–13; Ps 33:16 (32:16 Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.7 (CSEL 44:453–454; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-7).

## Letter 157.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-8
- Source: CSEL 44:454
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The will is truly free only when healed by grace; the psalmist prays for God to direct his steps rather than boasting of free choice.

### Latin text

Haec enim uoluntas libera tanto erit liberior quanto sanior, tanto autem sanior quanto diuinae misericordiae gratiaeque subiectior. ipsa quippe fideliter orat et dicit: Itinera mea dirige secundum uerbum tuum et ne dominetur mihi omnis iniquitas. quo modo enim libera est, cui dominatur iniquitas? ut autem ei non dominetur, uide, ab illa quis inuocetur. non enim ait: Itinera mea dirigo secundum liberum arbitrium, quia non dominatur mihi omnis iniquitas, sed: Itinera mea, inquit, dirige secundum uerbum tuum et ne dominetur mihi omnis iniquitas. precatur, non pollicetur; confitetur, non profitetur; optat plenissimam libertatem, non iactat propriam potestatem. non enim omnis, qui uiribus suis confidit, sed omnis, qui inuocat nomen domini, saluus erit. quo modo autem inuocabunt, inquit, in quem non crediderunt? ad hoc ergo credunt, qui recte credunt, ut inuocent, in quem crediderunt, et ualeant facere, quod in praeceptis legitimis acceperunt, quoniam id, quod lex imperat, fides impetrat.

### English translation (Claude)

For this free will will be the freer the healthier it is, and the healthier the more subject it is to divine mercy and grace. For it prays faithfully and says: "Direct my steps according to your word, and let no iniquity have dominion over me." For how is that will free over which iniquity has dominion? But see by whom it is called upon so that iniquity may not have dominion over it. For it does not say, "I direct my steps according to free choice, because no iniquity has dominion over me," but, "Direct my steps according to your word, and let no iniquity have dominion over me." It prays, it does not promise; it confesses, it does not profess; it wishes for the fullest freedom, it does not boast of its own power. For not everyone who trusts in his own strength, but "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. But how will they call on him," he says, "in whom they have not believed?" Those who believe rightly believe, then, so that they may call on him in whom they have believed and be able to do what they have received in the precepts of the law, since what the law commands, faith obtains.

### Scripture references

- Ps 119:133 (118:133 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 119:133 (118:133 Vulgate); Rom 10:13–14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.8 (CSEL 44:454; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-8).

## Letter 157.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-9
- Source: CSEL 44:454–455
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God both commands and gives continence, as the Book of Wisdom says; the law commands so that we may seek grace.

### Latin text

Nam ut interim omittamus legis multa praecepta et hoc inde commemoremus, quod ad commemorandum elegit apostolus, cum dicit lex: Non concupisces, quid uidetur aliud imperare nisi ab inlicitis cupiditatibus continentiam? animus quippe uelut pondere amore fertur, quocumque fertur. iubemur itaque detrahere de pondere cupiditatis, quod accedat ponderi caritatis, donec illud consumatur, hoc perficiatur; plenitudo enim legis caritas. et tamen de ipsa continentia uide quid scriptum sit: Et cum scirem, inquit, quia nemo potest esse continens, nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae, scire, cuius esset hoc donum, adii dominum et deprecatus sum illum. numquid dixit: Et cum scirem, quia nemo potest esse continens nisi per proprium liberum arbitrium, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae, scire a me ipso esse hoc bonum? non plane hoc dixit, quod quidam in sua uanitate dicunt, sed quod fuit in sanctae scripturae ueritate dicendum: Cum scirem, inquit, quia nemo potest esse continens, nisi deus det. iubet ergo deus continentiam et dat continentiam; iubet per legem, dat per gratiam; iubet per litteram, dat per spiritum; lex enim sine gratia facit abundare delictum et littera sine spiritu occidit. iubet ideo, ut facere iussa conati et in nostra infirmitate sub lege fatigati adiutorium gratiae poscere nouerimus et, si quid facere potuerimus operis boni, ei qui adiuuat, non simus ingrati. hoc et iste fecit; id enim eum sapientia docuit, cuius esset hoc donum.

### English translation (Claude)

To pass over for the moment the many precepts of the law and mention from it the one the apostle chose to mention, when the law says, "You shall not covet," what does it seem to command but restraint from unlawful desires? For the mind is carried by love as by a weight, wherever it is carried. We are commanded, then, to take away from the weight of desire what may be added to the weight of love, until the one is consumed and the other perfected; for "love is the fullness of the law." And yet see what is written about continence itself: "And when I knew," he says, "that no one can be continent unless God gives it, and this itself was a mark of wisdom, to know whose gift it was, I went to the Lord and besought him." Did he say: "And when I knew that no one can be continent except by his own free choice, and this itself was a mark of wisdom, to know that this good is from myself"? Plainly he did not say what some say in their vanity, but what was to be said in the truth of holy Scripture: "When I knew," he says, "that no one can be continent unless God gives it." God, then, commands continence and gives continence; he commands through the law, he gives through grace; he commands through the letter, he gives through the Spirit. For the law without grace makes the offense abound, and the letter without the Spirit kills. He commands, then, so that, having tried to do what is commanded and grown weary under the law in our weakness, we may know how to ask for the help of grace, and, if we have been able to do any good work, may not be ungrateful to him who helps. This is what that man did; for wisdom taught him whose gift this was.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:7: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Exod 20:17 (Rom 7:7); Rom 13:10; Rom 5:20; 2 Cor 3:6. Wis 8:21 (a book outside the 66, tagged as extrabiblical). "Love is the fullness of the law": plenitudo enim legis caritas.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.9 (CSEL 44:454–455; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-9).

## Letter 157.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-10
- Source: CSEL 44:455–457
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Grace does not abolish free will but helps it; whatever good one has is received from God, so one should glory in the Lord and pray humbly.

### Latin text

Neque enim uoluntatis arbitrium ideo tollitur, quia iuuatur, sed ideo iuuatur, quia non tollitur. qui enim deo dicit: Adiutor meus esto, confitetur se uelle implere, quod iussit, sed ab eo, qui iussit, adiutorium poscere, ut possit. sic et iste cum sciret neminem esse posse continentem, nisi deus det, adiit dominum et deprecatus est; utique uolens adiit, uolens deprecatus est nec petisset, nisi esset uoluntas. sed nisi petisset, quantum posset uoluntas, quia, etsi possit, antequam petat, quid ei prodest, nisi illi agat gratias ex eo, quod potest, a quo petendum est, quod nondum potest? unde etiam qui iam continens est, non habet utique continentiam, nisi adsit uoluntas; sed nisi accepisset, quid haberet uoluntas? quid enim habes, inquit, quod non accepisti? quod si accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? id est quid gloriaris, quasi a te ipso habeas, quod si non accepisses, a te ipso habere non posses? hoc autem dictum est, ut, qui gloriatur, non in se ipso sed in domino glorietur et, qui nondum habet, unde glorietur, non a se ipso speret, sed dominum precetur. satius est enim minus quemque habere, quod a deo petat, quam plus habere, quod sibi tribuat, quoniam expedit ab imo surgere quam ex alto cadere; deus enim, scriptum est, superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam. ad abundantiam igitur delictorum lex nos docet, quid uelle debeamus, nisi adiuuet gratia, ut, quod uolumus, ualeamus et, quod ualuerimus, impleamus. adiuuabit autem, si non de nostris uiribus praesumentes alta sapiamus, sed humilibus consentientes et de his, quae iam possumus, gratias agamus et pro his, quae nondum possumus, deum suppliciter inhiante uoluntate poscamus adminiculantes orationem nostram misericordiae fructuosis operibus dando, ut detur nobis, dimittendo, ut dimittatur nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

For the choice of the will is not taken away because it is helped; rather, it is helped because it is not taken away. For whoever says to God, "Be my helper," confesses that he wishes to fulfill what God commanded, but asks help from the one who commanded so that he may be able to. So too that man, since he knew that no one can be continent unless God gives it, went to the Lord and besought him; certainly he went willingly, besought willingly, and would not have asked unless there was will. But unless he had asked, what could the will have done? For even if it could do something before it asks, what does it profit unless it gives thanks for what it can do to him from whom must be asked what it cannot yet do? Hence even one who is already continent certainly does not have continence unless the will is present; but unless he had received it, what would the will have? "For what do you have," he says, "that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as if you had not received it?" That is, why do you boast as if you had from yourself what, if you had not received it, you could not have from yourself? This was said so that "he who glories may glory" not in himself but "in the Lord," and that one who does not yet have anything to glory in may not hope for it from himself but beseech the Lord. For it is better for anyone to have less, which he asks of God, than to have more, which he attributes to himself, since it is better to rise from the bottom than to fall from the height; for, it is written, "God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble." The law, then, to the abundance of offenses, teaches us what we ought to will, unless grace helps us to be able to do what we will and to accomplish what we are able. And it will help, if we do not presume on our own strength and mind high things, but agree with the humble, give thanks for what we can already do, and for what we cannot yet do ask God humbly with a longing will, supporting our prayer with fruitful works of mercy, by giving that it may be given to us, by forgiving that we may be forgiven.

### Scripture references

- Ps 27:9 (26:9 Vulg.): quotation, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:16: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 6:37: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 6:38: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 27:9 (26:9 Vulgate); Wis 8:21 (extrabiblical); 1 Cor 4:7; 1 Cor 1:31; Jas 4:6 (1 Pet 5:5); Rom 12:16; Luke 6:37–38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.10 (CSEL 44:455–457; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-10).

## Letter 157.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-11
- Source: CSEL 44:457–458
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Against the claim that unbaptized infants cannot perish, Augustine cites Romans 5 on sin entering through Adam, and defends infant baptism as freeing them from inherited condemnation.

### Latin text

Quod autem dicunt infantem morte praeuentum non baptizatum perire non posse, quoniam sine peccato nascitur, non hoc dicit apostolus et arbitror esse melius, ut apostolo potius quam istis credamus. dicit enim ille doctor gentium, in quo Christus loquebatur: Per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt; et paulo post dicit: Nam iudicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem. proinde isti, quem forte inuenerint infantem non ex illius unius hominis concupiscentia procreatum, ipsum dicant illi damnationi non esse obnoxium nec per Christi gratiam ab illa damnatione esse liberandum. quid est enim ex uno delicto in condemnationem, nisi illo delicto, quo deliquit Adam? et quid est ex multis delictis in iustificationem, nisi quia Christi gratia non solum unum illud delictum soluit, quo obstringuntur infantes ex illo uno homine procreati, sed etiam multa delicta, quae, cum creuerint, homines addunt malis moribus suis? tamen et illud unum, quo est obligata propago carnalis, quae ab illo primo homine originem ducit, sufficere dicit ad condemnationem. ideo non est superfluus baptismus paruulorum, ut, qui per generationem illi condemnationi obligati sunt, per regenerationem ab eadem condemnatione soluantur; sicut enim non inuenitur homo, qui praeter Adam carnaliter generetur, sic non inuenitur homo, qui praeter Christum spiritaliter regeneretur. carnalis autem generatio delicto illi uni et damnationi eius obnoxia est; spiritalis uero regeneratio non solum illud unum, propter quod baptizantur infantes, sed multa delicta facit aboleri, quae homines male uiuendo ad illud, in quo generati sunt, addiderunt. ideo sequitur et dicit: Si enim ob unius delictum mors regnauit per unum, multo magis, qui abundantiam gratiae et iustitiae accipiunt, in uita regnabunt per unum Iesum Christum. itaque sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem, ita et per unius iustificationem in omnes homines ad iustificationem uitae; sicut enim per inoboedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi, ita per unius oboedientiam iusti constituuntur multi.

### English translation (Claude)

As for their saying that an unbaptized infant overtaken by death cannot perish, since it is born without sin, the apostle does not say this, and I think it better that we believe the apostle rather than them. For that teacher of the Gentiles, in whom Christ spoke, says: "Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so it passed into all men, in whom all sinned"; and a little later he says: "For the judgment from one led to condemnation, but grace from many offenses to justification." So let these people, if they happen to find an infant not begotten from the concupiscence of that one man, say that this infant is not liable to that condemnation and need not be freed from that condemnation by the grace of Christ. For what is "from one offense to condemnation" but from that offense by which Adam offended? And what is "from many offenses to justification" but that the grace of Christ dissolves not only that one offense by which infants begotten from that one man are bound, but also the many offenses which people add by their evil conduct when they have grown up? Yet he says that even that one offense, by which the fleshly offspring that draws its origin from that first man is bound, suffices for condemnation. Therefore the baptism of little ones is not superfluous, so that those who by generation are bound to that condemnation may by regeneration be freed from the same condemnation. For just as no human being is found who is begotten according to the flesh except from Adam, so no human being is found who is spiritually regenerated except through Christ. The fleshly generation is liable to that one offense and its damnation; but the spiritual regeneration abolishes not only that one offense, on account of which infants are baptized, but many offenses which people have added by living wickedly to that in which they were begotten. Therefore he goes on to say: "For if by the offense of one death reigned through one, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and of righteousness reign in life through the one Jesus Christ. Therefore, as through the offense of one it came upon all men to condemnation, so too through the justification of one it comes upon all men to justification of life; for as through the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so through the obedience of one many are made righteous."

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 13:3: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 2 Cor 13:3; Rom 5:12, 16–19. Augustine reads Rom 5:12 in the Latin "in quo omnes peccauerunt" ("in whom all sinned"); the Greek ἐφʼ ᾧ is usually rendered "because". His teaching on unbaptized infants is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.11 (CSEL 44:457–458; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-11).

## Letter 157.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-12
- Source: CSEL 44:458–460
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's contrast between condemnation from one offense and justification from many shows that original sin is inherited by generation, not merely imitated.

### Latin text

Quid ad ista dicturi sunt? aut quid eis restat, nisi ut apostolum errasse contendant? clamat uas electionis, doctor gentium, tuba Christi: Iudicium ex uno in condemnationem et reclamant isti adserentes paruulos, quos ex illo uno homine, de quo loquitur, ducere propaginem confitentur, non ire in condemnationem, etiam si in Christo non fuerint baptizati. iudicium, inquit, ex uno in condemnationem. quid dicit ex uno nisi delicto? sequitur enim: Gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem. ergo inde iudicium etiam ex uno delicto ducit in condemnationem, hinc autem gratia etiam ex multis delictis ducit in iustificationem. quapropter, si non audent resistere apostolo, exponant nobis, qua re iudicium ex uno delicto ducat in condemnationem, cum ex multis delictis homines damnandi ueniant ad iudicium. aut si propterea ita dictum putant, quia initium peccati ex Adam factum est, quod imitati sunt ceteri, ut sic ex illo uno delicto in iudicium condemnationemque traherentur, qui eum imitando multa peccauerunt, cur non etiam de gratia et iustificatione sic dictum est? cur non dixit similiter: Et gratia ex uno delicto in iustificationem? sicut enim hominum multa delicta inter illud unum, quod imitati sunt, et iudicium, quo puniuntur, media reperiuntur — ab uno quippe ad multa uenerunt, ut a multis ad iudicium damnationemque ducerentur —, sic eadem multa delicta inter hoc ipsum unum, cuius imitatione commissa sunt, et gratiam, qua dimittuntur, eodem modo media sunt, quoniam ex illo uno ad multa uenerunt, ut ex multis ad gratiam iustificandi uenirent. cum ergo in utroque, id est et in iudicio et in gratia, quod adtinet ad unum et multa delicta, una eademque sit ratio, dicant isti nobis, qua re iudicium dixerit ex uno delicto ducere in condemnationem, gratiam uero ex multis delictis in iustificationem, aut adquiescant ideo sic esse dictum, quia in hac causa duo constituuntur homines, Adam, ex quo subsistit generatio carnalis, et Christus, ex quo regeneratio spiritalis. sed quia tantum ille homo, iste autem et deus et homo, non, quo modo illa generatio uno delicto obligat, quod est ex Adam, ita ista regeneratio unum delictum soluit, quod est ex Adam; sed illi quidem generationi sufficit ad condemnationem unius delicti conexio — quicquid enim postea homines ex malis suis operibus addunt, non pertinet ad illam generationem sed ad humanam conuersationem —, huic autem regenerationi non sufficit illud delictum tantum modo soluere, quod ex Adam trahitur, sed quicquid etiam postea ex iniquis operibus humanae conuersationis accedit. ideo iudicium ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem.

### English translation (Claude)

What will they say to this? Or what remains for them but to contend that the apostle erred? The chosen vessel, the teacher of the Gentiles, the trumpet of Christ, cries out: "The judgment from one led to condemnation"; and these people cry back, asserting that little ones, whom they admit derive their descent from that one man of whom he speaks, do not go into condemnation even if they have not been baptized in Christ. "The judgment," he says, "from one to condemnation." What does he mean by "from one" but "from one offense"? For there follows: "But grace from many offenses to justification." On the one side, then, the judgment leads to condemnation even from one offense; on the other, grace leads to justification even from many offenses. Therefore, if they do not dare to resist the apostle, let them explain to us why the judgment leads from one offense to condemnation, when people who are to be condemned come to judgment from many offenses. Or if they think it is said in this way because the beginning of sin was made by Adam, which the rest imitated, so that those who sinned much by imitating him were dragged in this way from that one offense to judgment and condemnation, why was it not said in the same way of grace and justification? Why did he not say likewise: "And grace from one offense to justification"? For just as people's many offenses are found in between that one which they imitated and the judgment by which they are punished (for they came from the one to the many, so as to be led from the many to judgment and damnation), so the same many offenses are in between in the same way between that one, in imitation of which they were committed, and the grace by which they are forgiven, since from that one they came to the many, so as to come from the many to the grace of justification. Since, then, in both, that is, in judgment and in grace, the reasoning is one and the same as regards the one and the many offenses, let them tell us why he said that the judgment leads from one offense to condemnation, but grace from many offenses to justification; or let them agree that it was said so because in this matter two men are set forth: Adam, from whom fleshly generation derives, and Christ, from whom spiritual regeneration. But because the former is only man, while the latter is both God and man, it is not the case that, as that generation binds with the one offense which is from Adam, so this regeneration dissolves only the one offense which is from Adam. Rather, for that generation the bond of one offense suffices for condemnation (for whatever people add afterward by their evil works does not belong to that generation but to human conduct), whereas for this regeneration it is not enough to dissolve only that offense which is drawn from Adam, but also whatever is added afterward from the wicked works of human conduct. Therefore "the judgment from one to condemnation, but grace from many offenses to justification."

### Scripture references

- Acts 9:15: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 5:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Acts 9:15; Rom 5:16. Augustine argues against the Pelagian view that Adam's sin passed to others only by imitation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.12 (CSEL 44:458–460; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-12).

## Letter 157.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-13
- Source: CSEL 44:460–461
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's "all" in Romans 5 means that all who are condemned are so through Adam and all who are justified are so through Christ, not that all are saved.

### Latin text

Si enim ob unius delictum mors regnauit per unum, a quo delicto paruuli per baptismum expiantur, multo magis. qui abundantiam gratiae et iustitiae accipiunt, in uita regnabunt per unum Iesum Christum; multo magis utique in uita regnabunt, quia aeternae uitae regnum erit, mors autem in eis temporaliter transit, non in aeternum regnabit. itaque sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem, de qua condemnatione paruuli per sacramentum baptismi liberandi sunt, ita et per unius iustificationem in omnes homines ad iustificationem uitae. et hic omnes dixit et ibi, non quia omnes homines ueniunt ad gratiam iustificationis Christi, cum tam multi alienati ab illa in aeternum moriantur, sed quia omnes. qui renascuntur in iustificationem, non nisi per Christum renascuntur, sicut omnes, qui nascuntur in condemnationem. non nisi per Adam nascuntur. nemo quippe est in illa generatione praeter Adam, nemo in ista regeneratione praeter Christum; ideo (omnes) et omnes, eosdem autem omnes etiam multos postea dicit adiungens: Sicut per inoboedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi. sic et per unius hominis oboedientiam iusti constituuntur multi. qui (multi), nisi quos iam paulo ante omnes) dixerat?

### English translation (Claude)

"For if by the offense of one death reigned through one" (an offense from which little ones are cleansed by baptism), "much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and of righteousness reign in life through the one Jesus Christ": much more, certainly, will they reign in life, because it will be the reign of eternal life, whereas death passes through them temporally and will not reign forever. "Therefore, as through the offense of one it came upon all men to condemnation" (from which condemnation little ones are to be freed by the sacrament of baptism), "so too through the justification of one upon all men to justification of life." He said "all" both here and there, not because all people come to the grace of Christ's justification, since so many, estranged from it, die forever, but because all who are reborn to justification are reborn only through Christ, just as all who are born to condemnation are born only through Adam. For no one is in that generation apart from Adam, no one in this regeneration apart from Christ; hence "all" and "all." But the same "all" he afterward calls "many," adding: "As through the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so too through the obedience of one man many are made righteous." Who are the "many" but those he had a little before called "all"?

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:17–19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.13 (CSEL 44:460–461; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-13).

## Letter 157.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-14
- Source: CSEL 44:461–462
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The righteous of the Old Testament were saved by the same faith in Christ's incarnation as Christians; the sacraments changed but the faith did not.

### Latin text

Vide, quem ad modum commendat (unum) et unum, id est Adam et Christum, illum ad condemnationem, hunc ad iustificationem, cum tanto post Adam uenerit Christus in carne, ut sciamus etiam antiquos iustos, quicumque esse potuerunt, non nisi per eandem fidem liberatos, per quam liberamur et nos, fidem scilicet incarnationis Christi, quae illis praenuntiabatur, sicut nobis adnuntiatur. ideo hic Christum hominem dicit, cum sit et deus, ne quis existimet antiquos iustos per deum tantum modo Christum, id est per uerbum, quod erat in principio, non etiam per fidem incarnationis eius, qua et homo Christus dicitur, potuisse liberari. sententia quippe ista destrui non potest, de qua et alibi dicit: Per unum hominem mors et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum; sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. utique resurrectionem dicit iustorum, ubi est uita aeterna, non resurrectionem iniquorum, ubi mors aeterna erit; ideo ait uiuificabuntur, quia illi damnabuntur. hinc et in ueteribus sacramentis circumcisio paruulorum octauo die fieri praecepta est, quoniam Christus, in quo fit delicti carnalis expoliatio, quam significat circumcisio, die dominico resurrexit, qui post septimum sabbati octauus est. haec ergo fides etiam antiquorum iustorum fuit. unde et apostolus dicit: Habentes autem eundem spiritum fidei, propter quod scriptum est: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum, et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. non diceret eundem spiritum fidei) nisi admonens etiam antiquos iustos ipsum habuisse spiritum fidei, hoc est incarnationis Christi. sed quia illis futura praenuntiabatur, quae iam facta nobis adnuntiatur, et tempore ueteris testamenti uelabatur, quae tempore noui testamenti reuelatur, ideo eius sacramenta uariata sunt, ut alia essent in uetere testamento alia in nouo, cum fides ipsa uaria non sit et uera sit, quia, sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

See how he commends the one and the one, that is, Adam and Christ, the former to condemnation, the latter to justification, although Christ came in the flesh so long after Adam, so that we may know that even the righteous of old, whoever they could be, were freed only through the same faith through which we too are freed, namely faith in the incarnation of Christ, which was foretold to them as it is announced to us. Therefore he here calls Christ a man, though he is also God, lest anyone think that the righteous of old could have been freed only through Christ as God, that is, through the Word which was in the beginning, and not also through faith in his incarnation, by which Christ is also called man. For that statement cannot be overthrown, of which he also says elsewhere: "Through one man came death, and through one man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all shall be made alive." He certainly speaks of the resurrection of the righteous, where there is eternal life, not of the resurrection of the wicked, where there will be eternal death; that is why he says "shall be made alive," because the others will be condemned. Hence too in the old sacraments the circumcision of little ones was commanded to be done on the eighth day, since Christ, in whom takes place the stripping off of fleshly offense which circumcision signifies, rose on the Lord's day, which is the eighth after the seventh, the sabbath. This, then, was also the faith of the righteous of old. Hence the apostle too says: "Having the same spirit of faith, as it is written, 'I believed, therefore I spoke,' we too believe, and therefore we also speak." He would not say "the same spirit of faith" except to remind us that the righteous of old too had this spirit of faith, that is, of Christ's incarnation. But because to them it was foretold as future, while to us it is announced as done, and in the time of the Old Testament it was veiled, while in the time of the New Testament it is revealed, therefore its sacraments have varied, so that some were in the Old Testament and others in the New, although faith itself does not vary and is true, because "as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all shall be made alive."

### Scripture references

- John 1:1: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 17:12: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:11: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:10 (115:10 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 1:1; 1 Cor 15:21–22; Gen 17:12; Col 2:11; 2 Cor 4:13 (Ps 116:10, 115:1 Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.14 (CSEL 44:461–462; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-14).

## Letter 157.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-15
- Source: CSEL 44:462–464
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law, whether natural, given in paradise, or Mosaic, could not give life but increased transgression; Christ's grace saves infants and adults alike, even the gravely fallen.

### Latin text

Quod uero illis uerbis, quae tractabamus, adiungit et dicit: Lex autem subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum, iam non pertinet ad illud delictum, quod trahitur ex Adam, de quo superius dicebat: Mors regnauit per unum; legem quippe siue naturalem intellegamus, quae in eorum apparet aetatibus, qui iam ratione uti possunt, siue conscriptam, quae data est per Moysen, quia nec ipsa potuit uiuificare et liberare a lege peccati et mortis, quae tracta est ex Adam, sed magis addidit praeuaricationis augmenta; ubi enim lex non est, ait idem apostolus, nec praeuaricatio. proinde quoniam lex est etiam in ratione hominis, qui iam utitur arbitrio libertatis, naturaliter in corde conscripta, qua suggeritur, ne mali aliquid faciat quisque alteri, quod pati ipse non uult, secundum hanc legem praeuaricatores sunt omnes, etiam qui legem per Moysen datam non acceperunt, de quibus in psalmo canitur: Praeuaricatores aestimaui omnes peccatores terrae. non enim omnes peccatores terrae legem per Moysen datam praeuaricarunt; sed tamen, nisi aliquam praeuaricassent, non appellarentur praeuaricatores; ubi enim lex non est, nec praeuaricatio est. praeuaricata ergo lege, quae in paradiso data est, nascitur homo ex Adam cum lege peccati et mortis, de qua dicitur: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. quae tamen nisi mala postea consuetudine roboretur, facilius uincitur, non tamen nisi gratia dei. lege autem alia praeuaricata, quae est in usu rationis animae rationalis in aetate hominis iam ratione utentis, praeuaricatores fiunt omnes peccatores terrae. praeuaricata uero lege etiam illa, quae data est per Moysen, multo amplius abundat delictum. si enim data esset lex, quae posset uiuificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia; sed conclusit scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus. haec uerba, si agnoscis, apostolica sunt. de qua lege iterum dicit: Lex praeuaricationis gratia posita est, donec ueniret semen, cui promissum est, disposita per angelos in manu mediatoris, Christum commendans. cuius gratia salui fiunt omnes siue paruuli a lege peccati et mortis, cum qua nati sumus, siue maiores, qui male utentes arbitrio uoluntatis praeuaricauerunt legem naturalem ipsius rationis, siue qui legem acceperunt, quae data est per Moysen, eamque praeuaricantes littera occisi sunt. cum uero etiam euangelica praecepta homo praeuaricat, uelut quatriduanus mortuus putet; nec de illo tamen desperandum est propter eius gratiam, qui non lente dixit, sed magna uoce clamauit: Lazare, ueni foras.

### English translation (Claude)

But what he adds to the words we were discussing, saying, "But the law came in so that the offense might abound," no longer concerns that offense which is drawn from Adam, of which he said above, "Death reigned through one"; whether we understand the natural law, which appears in the ages of those who can already use reason, or the written law, which was given through Moses, since neither could give life and free from the law of sin and death which is drawn from Adam, but rather added increases of transgression; for "where there is no law," says the same apostle, "there is no transgression either." Accordingly, since there is a law also in the reason of a human being who already uses the choice of freedom, written naturally in the heart, by which it is suggested that no one should do to another any evil that he himself does not wish to suffer, according to this law all are transgressors, even those who did not receive the law given through Moses, of whom it is sung in the psalm: "I have counted all the sinners of the earth transgressors." For not all the sinners of the earth transgressed the law given through Moses; yet unless they had transgressed some law, they would not be called transgressors; for where there is no law, there is no transgression. Since the law given in paradise was transgressed, then, man is born from Adam with the law of sin and death, of which it is said: "I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive in the law of sin which is in my members." This law, unless it is afterward strengthened by bad habit, is more easily overcome, yet only by the grace of God. When the other law is transgressed, which is in the use of reason of the rational soul at the age when a person already uses reason, all the sinners of the earth become transgressors. And when even that law which was given through Moses is transgressed, the offense abounds much more. "For if a law had been given which could give life, righteousness would indeed be from the law; but Scripture has shut up all things under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe." These words, if you recognize them, are the apostle's. Of this law he says again: "The law was set up because of transgression, until the offspring should come to whom the promise was made, ordained through angels in the hand of a mediator," commending Christ. By his grace all are saved: whether little ones, from the law of sin and death with which we were born; or adults, who, using the choice of the will badly, have transgressed the natural law of reason itself; or those who received the law given through Moses and, transgressing it, were killed by the letter. But when a man transgresses even the precepts of the gospel, he stinks like one four days dead; yet even of him one must not despair, because of the grace of him who did not speak softly but cried with a loud voice: "Lazarus, come out."

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:2: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:12: echo, medium confidence
- Ps 119:119 (118:119 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:23: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:22: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- John 11:39: allusion, high confidence
- John 11:43: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:20, 17; Rom 8:2; Rom 4:15; Matt 7:12 (golden rule, echo); Ps 119:119 (118:119 Vulgate); Rom 7:23; Gal 3:21–22; Gal 3:19; 2 Cor 3:6; John 11:39, 43.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.15 (CSEL 44:462–464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-15).

## Letter 157.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-16
- Source: CSEL 44:464–465
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who groan to God in the words of the psalms receive superabounding grace; Paul in Romans 7 credits deliverance to grace, not free choice.

### Latin text

Lex ergo subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum, siue cum homines neglegunt, quod deus iubet, siue cum de suis uiribus praesumentes adiutorium gratiae non inplorant et addunt infirmitati superbiam. cum autem uocatione diuina intellegunt, cui sit ingemescendum, et inuocant eum, in quem recte credunt, dicentes: Miserere mei, deus, secundum magnam misericordiam tuam et: Ego dixi: Domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam, quoniam peccaui tibi, et: In tua iustitia uiuifica me et: Viam iniquitatis amoue a me et lege tua miserere mei et: Non ueniat mihi pes superbiae et manus peccatorum non moueat me et: Itinera mea dirige secundum uerbum tuum et ne dominetur mihi omnis iniquitas; a domino enim gressus hominis diriguntur et uiam eius uolet et alia multa, quae propterea scripta sunt, ut nos admonerent ad implenda ea, quae nobis iubentur, ab illo petendum adiutorium, a quo iubentur, cum ergo se homo ad illum extenderit et sic ingemuerit, fiet, quod sequitur: Ubi abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia et: Dimittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum, et diffunditur in corde caritas dei, unde fiat legis plenitudo, non per uires arbitrii, quod est in nobis, sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. nouerat quippe ille legem, qui dicebat: Condelector enim legi dei secundum interiorem hominem, et tamen adiungebat: Video autem aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. cur non potius dixit meum liberum arbitrium, nisi quia libertas sine dei gratia non est libertas sed contumacia?

### English translation (Claude)

"The law came in," then, "so that the offense might abound," whether when people neglect what God commands or when, presuming on their own strength, they do not implore the help of grace and add pride to weakness. But when, by the divine calling, they understand to whom they must groan, and call on him in whom they rightly believe, saying: "Have mercy on me, O God, according to your great mercy," and: "I said, Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you," and: "In your righteousness give me life," and: "Remove the way of iniquity from me, and by your law have mercy on me," and: "Let not the foot of pride come against me, and let not the hand of sinners move me," and: "Direct my steps according to your word, and let no iniquity have dominion over me"; "for the steps of a man are directed by the Lord, and he will delight in his way"; and many other things which were written in order to admonish us that, to fulfill what we are commanded, we must ask help from him by whom we are commanded; when, then, a man has stretched himself out toward him and has groaned in this way, there will come about what follows: "Where the offense abounded, grace has superabounded," and: "Her many sins are forgiven, because she loved much," and the love of God is poured into the heart, from which comes the fullness of the law, not through the powers of the choice that is in us but "through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us." For he knew the law who said: "For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man," and yet he added: "But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive in the law of sin which is in my members. Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord." Why did he not rather say "my free choice," except that freedom without the grace of God is not freedom but stubbornness?

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:1 (50:3 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 41:4 (40:5 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:40 (118:40 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:29 (118:29 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:11 (35:12 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:133 (118:133 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 37:23 (36:23 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 7:47: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:20; Ps 51:1 (50:3 Vulgate); Ps 41:4 (40:5 Vulgate); Ps 119:40, 29 (118 Vulgate); Ps 36:11 (35:12 Vulgate); Ps 119:133 (118:133 Vulgate); Ps 37:23 (36:23 Vulgate); Luke 7:47; Rom 5:5; Rom 7:22–25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.16 (CSEL 44:464–465; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-16).

## Letter 157.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-17
- Source: CSEL 44:465–466
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's wording in Rom 5:21 shows that grace through Christ dissolves both inherited sin and the many sins added by human conduct.

### Latin text

Cum ergo dixisset apostolus: Lex subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum; ubi autem abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia, secutus adiunxit: Ut, quem ad modum regnauit peccatum in morte, sic et gratia regnet per iustitiam in uitam aeternam per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. modo cum dixisset: Ut quem ad modum regnauit peccatum in morte, non ait per unum hominem aut per primum hominem aut per Adam, quia iam dixerat: Lex subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum, quae abundantia delicti non pertinet ad primi hominis propaginem sed ad conuersationis humanae praeuaricationem, quae illi uni delicto, quo solo obstricti tenentur infantes, iam in maioribus aetatibus ex abundantia iniquitatis adiecta est. sed quoniam hoc totum. etiam quod non pertinet ad illius unius delicti originem, tamen idonea est soluere gratia saluatoris, ideo, cum dixisset: Sic et gratia regnet per iustitiam in uitam aeternam. addidit: Per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum.

### English translation (Claude)

When, then, the apostle had said, "The law came in so that the offense might abound; but where the offense abounded, grace superabounded," he went on to add: "so that, as sin reigned in death, so grace too might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Now, when he had said, "so that, as sin reigned in death," he did not say "through one man" or "through the first man" or "through Adam," because he had already said, "The law came in so that the offense might abound," and this abundance of offense does not belong to the offspring of the first man but to the transgression of human conduct, which, in later ages, out of the abundance of iniquity, has been added to that one offense by which alone infants are held bound. But since the grace of the Savior is able to dissolve all this, even what does not belong to the origin of that one offense, therefore, when he had said, "so too grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life," he added: "through Jesus Christ our Lord."

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:20–21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.17 (CSEL 44:465–466; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-17).

## Letter 157.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-18
- Source: CSEL 44:466–467
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Infants share Adam's sin and need baptism; before the law sin existed but was not imputed, since there was no law to expose it.

### Latin text

Nullius itaque argumentationes contra haec apostolica uerba prolatae impediant paruulos ad salutem, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro; tanto magis enim pro eis loqui debemus, quanto ipsi pro se loqui non possunt. per unum hominem intrauit peccatum in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt. sicut ab illo uno homine sic ab eodem peccato infantes immunes esse non possunt, nisi ab eius reatu per Christi baptismum resoluantur. usque enim ad legem peccatum in mundo fuit. non quia deinceps in nemine fuit, hoc dictum est, sed quia non poterat per litteram legis auferri, quod solo poterat spiritu gratiae. ne quisquam ergo fidens de uiribus non dico uoluntatis sed potius uanitatis suae putaret libero arbitrio legem potuisse sufficere et Christi gratiam derideret, ideo ait apostolus: Usque enim ad legem peccatum in mundo fuit; peccatum autem non deputabatur, cum lex non esset. non dixit non erat, sed non deputabatur, quia lex non erat, qua arguente demonstraretur, siue lex rationis in paruulo siue lex litterae in populo.

### English translation (Claude)

Let no one's arguments, then, put forward against these words of the apostle, hinder little ones from the salvation which is in Christ Jesus our Lord; for we ought to speak for them the more, the less they can speak for themselves. "Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so it passed into all men, in whom all sinned." As infants cannot be exempt from that one man, so they cannot be exempt from the same sin, unless they are released from its guilt by the baptism of Christ. "For until the law sin was in the world." This was said not because afterward it was in no one, but because what could be taken away only by the Spirit of grace could not be taken away by the letter of the law. Lest anyone, then, trusting in the powers not, I say, of his will but rather of his vanity, should think that the law could suffice for free choice, and deride the grace of Christ, the apostle says: "For until the law sin was in the world; but sin was not imputed when there was no law." He did not say "it did not exist," but "it was not imputed," because there was no law by whose reproof it could be shown, whether the law of reason in a little one or the law of the letter in a people.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.18 (CSEL 44:466–467; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-18).

## Letter 157.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-19
- Source: CSEL 44:467–469
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Death reigned even over those who had not personally sinned because of Adam's transgression; Augustine discusses two interpretations and a textual variant in Rom 5:14.

### Latin text

Sed regnauit, inquit, mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen, quia nec lex per Moysen data potuit regnum mortis auferre, quod sola Christi abstulit gratia. in quos autem regnauerit, uide: Et in eos, inquit, qui non peccauerunt, in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae. regnauit ergo et in eos, qui non peccauerunt. sed cur regnauerit, ostendit, cum ait: In similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae. iste enim est melior intellectus horum uerborum, ut, cum dixisset: Regnauit mors in eos, qui non peccauerunt, quasi nos moueret, quare in eos regnauerit, qui non peccauerunt, adderet: In similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae, id est quia inerat in eorum membris similitudo praeuaricationis Adae. potest et sic intellegi: Regnauit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen et in eos, qui non in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae peccauerunt, quia in semet ipsis, cum iam nati essent, nec ratione adhuc uterentur, qua ille utebatur, quando peccauit, nec praeceptum accepissent, quod ille transgressus est, sed solo originali uitio tenerentur obstricti, per quod eos regnum mortis traheret ad condemnationem. quod regnum mortis in eis tantum non est, qui Christi gratia renati ad eius pertinent regnum, quoniam mors temporalis, quamuis et ipsa de originali delicto propagata sit, corpus in eis interimit, animam uero ad poenas non trahit, ubi uoluit regnum mortis intellegi, ut anima renouata per gratiam iam non moriatur in gehenna, id est a uita dei non alienetur, non separetur, temporalis autem mors corporis etiam in his, qui Christi morte redimuntur, relinquatur interim ad exercitationem fidei et agonem praesentis luctaminis, in quo et martyres certauerunt, absumatur uero et ipsa in renouatione corporis, quam resurrectio pollicetur. ibi enim penitus absorbebitur mors in uictoriam, cui modo gratia Christi adimit regnum, ne suorum animas ad poenas tartari pertrahat. nonnulli sane codices non habent in eos, qui non peccauerunt, sed in eos, qui peccauerunt in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae, quibus quidem uerbis nullo modo iste sensus aufertur. secundum hoc quippe intelleguntur peccasse in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae, secundum quod supra dictum est: In quo omnes peccauerunt. sed tamen Graeci codices, unde in Latinum scriptura translata est, illud plures habent, quod diximus.

### English translation (Claude)

"But death reigned," he says, "from Adam to Moses," because not even the law given through Moses could take away the reign of death, which only the grace of Christ took away. But see over whom it reigned: "Even over those," he says, "who had not sinned, in the likeness of Adam's transgression." It reigned, then, even over those who had not sinned. But he showed why it reigned when he said, "in the likeness of Adam's transgression." For this is the better understanding of these words: that when he had said, "Death reigned over those who had not sinned," as if we were troubled why it reigned over those who had not sinned, he added, "in the likeness of Adam's transgression," that is, because there was in their members the likeness of Adam's transgression. It can also be understood thus: "Death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who did not sin in the likeness of Adam's transgression," because in themselves, when they had been born, they neither yet used reason, which he used when he sinned, nor had received a commandment, which he transgressed, but were held bound only by the original fault, through which the reign of death would drag them to condemnation. This reign of death is absent only in those who, reborn by the grace of Christ, belong to his kingdom; for temporal death, although it too has been propagated from the original offense, destroys the body in them but does not drag the soul to punishments, which is what he meant the reign of death to be understood as; so that the soul renewed by grace no longer dies in Gehenna, that is, is not estranged or separated from the life of God, while the temporal death of the body is left for the time being even in those who are redeemed by the death of Christ, for the exercise of faith and the contest of the present struggle, in which the martyrs too contended; but it too will be consumed in the renewal of the body which the resurrection promises. For there death will be wholly swallowed up in victory; from it the grace of Christ now takes away its reign, so that it may not drag the souls of his own to the punishments of Tartarus. Some manuscripts, indeed, do not have "over those who had not sinned" but "over those who sinned in the likeness of Adam's transgression"; but by these words this sense is in no way removed. For in this reading they are understood to have sinned in the likeness of Adam's transgression in the sense in which it was said above, "in whom all sinned." Yet more of the Greek manuscripts, from which the Scripture was translated into Latin, have the reading we gave.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:14; 1 Cor 15:54; Rom 5:12. Augustine notes a variant in Rom 5:14 (with or without "not"), preferring the reading with "not" on the authority of most Greek manuscripts.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.19 (CSEL 44:467–469; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-19).

## Letter 157.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-20
- Source: CSEL 44:469–470
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Adam is a type of Christ by contrast, but the gift exceeds the offense: Christ's life is eternal and his redemption covers many sins.

### Latin text

Quod uero adiunxit de Adam: Qui est forma futuri, neque hoc uno modo intellegitur. aut enim forma Christi a contrario est, ut, quem ad modum in illo omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificentur et, quo modo per ipsius inoboedientiam peccatores constituti sunt multi, sic per Christi oboedientiam iusti constituantur multi, aut formam futuri eum dixit, quod ipse inflixerit formam mortis posteris suis. ille tamen est melior intellectus, ut a contrario forma esse credatur, quam multum commendat apostolus. denique, ne omnino ex aequo in hac forma eadem contraria pensarentur, adiungit et dicit: Sed non sicut delictum ita et donatio; si enim ob unius delictum multi mortui sunt, multo magis gratia dei et donum in gratia unius hominis Iesu Christi in multos abundauit, ut intellegatur non in magis multos, cum iniqui magis multi sint, qui damnabuntur, sed magis abundauit, quia in his, qui per Christum redimuntur, temporaliter ualet forma mortis ex Adam, in aeternum autem ualebit uitae forma per Christum. quamuis ergo, inquit, Adam futuri forma sit a contrario, plus tamen praestat Christus regeneratis, quam eis nocuerat ille generatis. et non sicut per unum peccantem ita est et donum; nam iudicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem. non solum in hoc, inquit, non aequalis est forma, quia ille temporaliter nocuit eis, quos in aeternum Christus redemit, uerum etiam quia illius uno delicto posteri, nisi a Christo redimantur, traduntur in condemnationem, Christi autem redemptio etiam multa delicta dissoluit, quae illi uni abundantia praeuaricatricis iniquitatis adiecit, unde iam superius disputauimus.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what he added about Adam, "who is a type of the one to come," this too is not understood in only one way. For either he is a type of Christ by contrast, so that, as in him all die, so in Christ all may be made alive, and as through his disobedience many were made sinners, so through Christ's obedience many may be made righteous; or he called him a type of the one to come because he stamped the type of death on his descendants. Yet the better understanding is that he is believed to be a type by contrast, which the apostle strongly commends. Indeed, lest these contraries should be weighed as altogether equal in this type, he adds: "But not as the offense, so also the gift; for if by the offense of one many died, much more has the grace of God and the gift in the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many," so that it is understood not "to more," since the wicked who will be condemned are more numerous, but "abounded more," because in those who are redeemed through Christ the type of death from Adam is in force temporally, but the type of life through Christ will be in force forever. Although, then, he says, Adam is a type of the one to come by contrast, Christ nevertheless gives more to the regenerated than Adam had harmed the generated. "And not as through one who sinned, so is the gift; for the judgment from one led to condemnation, but grace from many offenses to justification." Not only in this, he says, is the type unequal, that Adam harmed temporally those whom Christ redeemed forever, but also because by his one offense his descendants, unless redeemed by Christ, are handed over to condemnation, whereas Christ's redemption dissolves also the many offenses which the abundance of transgressing iniquity has added to that one, of which we have already spoken above.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:19: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 5:14–16; 1 Cor 15:22; Rom 5:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.20 (CSEL 44:469–470; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-20).

## Letter 157.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-21
- Source: CSEL 44:470
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If sin passed only by imitation, Paul would have named the devil, and Abel as the model of righteousness; instead he contrasts Adam and Christ.

### Latin text

Contra haec apostoli uerba sanumque intellectum nemini adquiescas, si uis Christo et in Christo uiuere. nam si, quem ad modum illi dicunt, propterea ista commemorasset apostolus, ut intellegeremus ad primum hominem peccatores ideo pertinere, quia non delictum ex illo nascendo traximus, sed eum imitando peccamus, diabolum potius poneret, qui et prior peccauit et de quo nullam substantiae propaginem traxit genus humanum, sed eum sola imitatio subsecuta est, unde diceretur pater impiorum, sicut noster dicitur pater Abraham propter imitationem fidei, non propter originem carnis. nam ideo de ipso diabolo dictum est: Imitantur autem illum, qui sunt ex parte ipsius. deinde si propter imitationem hoc loco apostolus commemoraret primum hominem, quia primus peccator in hominibus fuit, ut ideo ad illum omnes homines peccatores diceret pertinere, cur non sanctum Abel posuit, quoniam primus in hominibus iustus fuit, ad quem iusti omnes propter imitationem iustitiae pertinerent? sed posuit Adam, contra quem non posuit nisi Christum, quia sicut ille homo delicto suo uitiauit posteritatem suam, sic iste deus homo iustitia sua saluauit hereditatem suam, ille traiciendo carnis inmunditiam, quod non poterat impius diabolus, ille donando spiritus gratiam, quod non poterat Abel iustus.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not give way to anyone against these words of the apostle and their sound understanding, if you wish to live to Christ and in Christ. For if, as they say, the apostle had mentioned these things so that we might understand that sinners belong to the first man because we sin by imitating him, not because we have contracted the offense from him by being born, he would rather have named the devil, who both sinned first and from whom the human race has drawn no propagation of substance, but whom imitation alone has followed, so that he is called the father of the impious, just as Abraham is called our father because of the imitation of his faith, not because of fleshly origin. For this is why it was said of the devil himself: "But those who are of his party imitate him." Further, if the apostle mentioned the first man in this passage because of imitation, since he was the first sinner among human beings, so as to say that all sinful human beings belong to him for that reason, why did he not name holy Abel, since he was the first righteous man among human beings, to whom all the righteous would belong because of the imitation of righteousness? But he named Adam, and set against him none but Christ, because as that man by his offense corrupted his posterity, so this God-man by his righteousness saved his inheritance: the one by transmitting the uncleanness of the flesh, which the impious devil could not do; the other by giving the grace of the Spirit, which righteous Abel could not do.

### Scripture references

- John 8:44: echo, medium confidence
- Rom 4:16: echo, medium confidence
- Heb 11:4: echo, low confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 2:25 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 8:44 (echo); Rom 4:11–16 (echo); Wis 2:25 (extrabiblical; Old Latin "imitantur autem illum qui sunt ex parte illius"); Heb 11:4 (Abel, echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.21 (CSEL 44:470; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-6/#p-157-21).

## Letter 157.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-22
- Source: CSEL 44:470–472
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Hilary about Caelestius, condemned at Carthage, who admitted infants need redemption, and hopes the Pelagians may be healed within the church.

### Latin text

Multa de his quaestionibus in aliis nostris opusculis et ecclesiasticis sermonibus diximus. quoniam fuerunt etiam apud nos quidam, qui, ubicumque poterant, haec sui erroris noua semina spargerent, quorum nonnullos per ministerium nostrum fratrumque nostrorum misericordia domini ab illa peste sanauit. nec tamen hic deesse aliquos arbitror maxime apud Carthaginem, sed iam occulte mussitant timentes ecclesiae fundatissimam fidem. nam unus eorum nomine Caelestius in eiusdem ciuitatis ecclesia iam ad presbyterii honorem subrepere coeperat, sed fidelissima libertate fratrum propter has ipsas contra Christi gratiam disputationes usque ad iudicium episcopale perductus est. tamen coactus est confiteri propter baptizandos paruulos, quod et ipsis redemptio sit necessaria. ubi quamquam noluerit de originali peccato expressius aliquid dicere, tamen ipsius redemptionis nomine non parum sibi praescripsit. unde enim redimendi sunt nisi a diaboli potestate, in qua esse non possent nisi originalis obligatione peccati? aut quo pretio redimuntur nisi Christi sanguine, de quo apertissime scriptum est, quod in remissionem effusus sit peccatorum? sed quia magis conuictus et ab ecclesia detestatus quam correctus et pacatus abscessit, ueritus sum, ne forte ipse ibi sit, qui uestram fidem perturbare conatur; ideo nominis ipsius commemorationem putaui esse faciendam. sed siue ipse sit siue alii consortes eius erroris — plures enim sunt, quam sperare possumus, et, ubi non redarguuntur, etiam alios ad suam sectam seducunt et sic crebrescunt, ut nesciam, quo sint erupturi —, nos tamen malumus eos in ecclesiae compage sanari, quam ex illius corpore uelut insanabilia membra resecari, si tamen hoc permittat ipsa necessitas. timendum est enim, ne plura putrescant, dum putribus parcitur. potens autem est misericordia domini nostri, quae potius eos ab hac peste liberet. quod sine dubio faciet, si fideliter aduertant teneantque, quod scriptum est: Qui inuocauerit nomen domini saluus erit.

### English translation (Claude)

We have said much on these questions in other little works of ours and in sermons in church, since there were also among us certain people who, wherever they could, scattered these new seeds of their error; some of them the Lord's mercy has healed of that plague through our ministry and that of our brothers. Yet I think that some are not lacking here, especially at Carthage; but now they mutter secretly, fearing the most firmly founded faith of the church. For one of them, named Caelestius, had already begun to creep into the honor of the presbyterate in the church of that same city, but by the most faithful freedom of the brothers, because of these very disputations against the grace of Christ, he was brought to episcopal judgment. Nevertheless, because of the baptism of little ones, he was compelled to confess that redemption is necessary for them too. Although he did not wish to say anything more explicit there about original sin, yet by the very word "redemption" he bound himself not a little. For from what are they to be redeemed if not from the power of the devil, in which they could not be except by the bond of original sin? Or at what price are they redeemed if not by the blood of Christ, of which it is most plainly written that it was poured out for the forgiveness of sins? But because he went away convicted and detested by the church rather than corrected and reconciled, I feared that perhaps he himself is there trying to disturb your faith; therefore I thought his name should be mentioned. But whether it is he or others sharing his error (for there are more of them than we could hope, and where they are not refuted they lead others into their sect too and so multiply that I do not know where they will break out), we nevertheless prefer that they be healed within the fabric of the church rather than cut off from its body as incurable members, if necessity itself permits it. For it is to be feared that more may rot while the rotten are spared. But the mercy of our Lord is powerful, and may it rather free them from this plague. This it will undoubtedly do, if they faithfully heed and hold what is written: "Whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:28: allusion, high confidence
- Joel 2:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Caelestius was condemned by a council at Carthage in 411. Scripture: Matt 26:28; Joel 2:32 (Rom 10:13).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.22 (CSEL 44:470–472; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-22).

## Letter 157.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-23
- Source: CSEL 44:472–473
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Against the claim that the rich cannot be saved, Augustine cites the wealthy patriarchs and the parable of Lazarus, carried to rich Abraham's bosom.

### Latin text

Audi iam pauca de diuitibus, quod in epistula tua sequitur inquirendum. hoc enim posuisti illos dicere, diuitem manentem in diuitiis suis regnum dei non posse ingredi, nisi omnia sua uendiderit, nec ei prodesse posse, si forte ex ipsis diuitiis mandata fecerit. euaserunt istorum disputationes patres nostri Abraham et Isaac et Iacob, qui tanto ante ex hac uita emigrarunt. habebant quippe hi omnes non paruas diuitias, sicut fidelissima scriptura testatur; multos tamen uenturos ab oriente et ab occidente et non supra ipsos uel extra ipsos sed cum ipsis recubituros in regno caelorum ille ipse, qui propter nos pauper factus est, cum uere diues esset, ueracissima promissione praedixit. et quamuis superbus diues, qui induebatur purpura et bysso et epulabatur cotidie splendide, mortuus apud inferos torqueretur, tamen, si pauperis ulcerosi, qui ante ianuam eius contemptus iacebat, miseratus fuisset, mereretur et ipse misericordiam. et si pauperi illi meritum esset inopia, non iustitia, non utique ab angelis in Abrahae gremium, qui diues hic fuerat, tolleretur. sed ut nobis ostenderetur nec in isto per se ipsam paupertatem diuinitus honoratam nec in illo diuitias fuisse damnatas, sed in isto pietatem, in illo impietatem suos exitus habuisse, sic suscepit impium diuitem cruciatus ignis, ut tamen pium pauperem susciperet sinus diuitis. qui sane cum hic diues uiueret, diuitias sic habebat et eas pro dei praeceptis tam parui pendebat, ut etiam ipsius immolatione nollet offendere deum iubentem, quem suarum diuitiarum et sperabat et optabat heredem.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear now a few things about the rich, which is the next point to be inquired into in your letter. For you reported that they say that a rich man who remains in his riches cannot enter the kingdom of God unless he has sold all he has, and that it cannot profit him if he has kept the commandments with those riches. Our fathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob escaped these people's disputations, having departed this life so long before. For all these had no small riches, as most faithful Scripture testifies; yet he himself who for our sake became poor, though he was truly rich, foretold with most truthful promise that many would come from the east and the west and recline, not above them or outside them, but with them in the kingdom of heaven. And although the proud rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen and feasted splendidly every day, was tormented after death in the underworld, yet if he had had pity on the ulcerous poor man who lay despised before his door, he too would have obtained mercy. And if that poor man's merit had been his poverty and not his righteousness, he would certainly not have been carried by the angels into the bosom of Abraham, who had been rich here. But to show us that neither was poverty in itself honored by God in the one nor riches condemned in the other, but that godliness in the one and ungodliness in the other had their outcomes, the torment of fire received the ungodly rich man in such a way that the bosom of a rich man received the godly poor man. That rich man, indeed, while he lived here, so held his riches and valued them so little in comparison with God's commands that he was unwilling to offend God's command even by sacrificing his son, whom he both hoped and wished to be the heir of his riches.

### Scripture references

- Gen 13:2: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 8:9: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:11: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:19: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 13:2, 26:13, 30:43 (wealth of the patriarchs); 2 Cor 8:9; Matt 8:11; Luke 16:19–23; Gen 22:1–12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.23 (CSEL 44:472–473; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-23).

## Letter 157.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-24
- Source: CSEL 44:473–474
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians reply that the patriarchs were not yet commanded to sell everything, as the rich young man was under the New Testament.

### Latin text

Hic utique dicunt ideo patres antiquos non uendidisse omnia, quae habebant, et dedisse pauperibus, quia hoc eis non praeceperat dominus. nondum enim reuelato testamento nouo, quod non fieri nisi plenitudine temporis oportebat, nec eorum uirtus fuerat reuelanda, qua uirtute hoc eos facillime posse deus in eorum cordibus nouerat, qui testimonium illis tam insigne perhibebat, ut, cum sit omnium sanctorum atque iustorum deus, tamquam de praecipuis amicis suis dicere dignaretur: Ego sum deus Abraham et deus Isaac et deus Iacob; hoc mihi nomen est in aeternum. posteaquam uero magnum pietatis sacramentum manifestatum est in carne et uocandis omnibus gentibus Christi aduentus inluxit, in quem etiam illi patres crediderant, sed huius fidei oliuam suo tempore manifestandam in illius arboris, de qua apostolus loquitur, tamquam radice seruabant, dictum est diuiti: Vende omnia, quae habes, et da pauperibus et habebis thesaurum in caelis et ueni, sequere me.

### English translation (Claude)

Here, no doubt, they say that the ancient fathers did not sell all they had and give to the poor because the Lord had not commanded it of them. For since the New Testament had not yet been revealed, which was to happen only in the fullness of time, neither was their virtue to be revealed, by which virtue God knew in their hearts that they could very easily do this; he bore them so remarkable a testimony that, though he is the God of all the saints and righteous, he deigned to say, as of his special friends: "I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob; this is my name forever." But after the great mystery of godliness was manifested in the flesh, and the coming of Christ shone forth to call all the nations (in whom those fathers too had believed, but they kept the olive of this faith, to be manifested in its time, as in the root of that tree of which the apostle speaks), it was said to the rich man: "Sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me."

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gal 4:4; Exod 3:15; 1 Tim 3:16; Rom 11:17–18; Matt 19:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.24 (CSEL 44:473–474; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-24).

## Letter 157.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-25
- Source: CSEL 44:474–475
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ told the rich young man that keeping the commandments leads to life and that selling everything is the counsel of perfection, so the rich who keep the commandments can be saved.

### Latin text

Haec si dicunt, uidentur aliquid rationabiliter dicere. sed totum audiant, totum aduertant, non in parte aures aperiant, in parte surdescant. cui enim dominus hoc praecepit? profecto illi diuiti, qui uitae aeternae consequendae consilium quaerebat accipere; hoc enim domino dixerat: Quid faciam, ut uitam aeternam consequar? ille autem non ei respondit: Si uis uenire ad uitam, uade, uende omnia, quae habes, sed: Si uis uenire, inquit, ad uitam, serua mandata. quae iuuenis cum sibi a domino ex lege commemorata mandata seruasse dixisset et quaesisset, quid adhuc sibi deesset, responsum accepit: Si uis esse perfectus, uade, uende omnia, quae habes, et da pauperibus. et ne se illa, quae multum amabat, hoc modo perdere existimaret: Et habebis, inquit, thesaurum in caelis. deinde addidit: Et ueni, sequere me, ne cuiquam, cum hoc fecerit, aliquid prodesse existimetur. si non sequitur Christum. at ille quidem tristis abscessit, qui uiderit, quem ad modum illa legis mandata seruauerat: puto enim, quod se adrogantius quam uerius seruasse responderat. uerum tamen magister bonus mandata legis ab ista excellentiore perfectione distinxit; ibi enim dixit: Si uis uenire ad uitam, serua mandata, hic autem: Si uis esse perfectus, uade, uende omnia, quae habes, et cetera. cur ergo negamus diuites, quamuis ab illa perfectione absint, uenire tamen ad uitam, si mandata seruauerint et dederint, ut detur illis, dimiserint, ut dimittatur illis?

### English translation (Claude)

If they say this, they seem to say something reasonable. But let them hear the whole, heed the whole, and not open their ears to part and go deaf to part. For to whom did the Lord give this command? Surely to that rich man who sought to receive counsel on obtaining eternal life; for he had said to the Lord: "What shall I do to obtain eternal life?" But he did not answer him: "If you wish to come to life, go, sell all that you have," but: "If you wish to come to life," he said, "keep the commandments." When the young man said he had kept the commandments of the law which the Lord recalled to him, and asked what he still lacked, he received the answer: "If you wish to be perfect, go, sell all that you have and give to the poor." And lest he think he was losing in this way the things he greatly loved, he said: "And you will have treasure in heaven." Then he added: "And come, follow me," lest anyone think that doing this profits him anything if he does not follow Christ. But he went away sad (let others see how he had kept those commandments of the law; for I think he answered that he had kept them more arrogantly than truthfully). Yet the good Teacher distinguished the commandments of the law from this more excellent perfection; for there he said, "If you wish to come to life, keep the commandments," but here, "If you wish to be perfect, go, sell all that you have," and the rest. Why, then, do we deny that the rich, though they are far from that perfection, nevertheless come to life if they have kept the commandments and have given that it may be given to them, and forgiven that they may be forgiven?

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:20: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:22: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 6:37: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 6:38: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:16–22; Luke 6:37–38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.25 (CSEL 44:474–475; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-25).

## Letter 157.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-26
- Source: CSEL 44:475
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's instruction to the rich in 1 Timothy 6 shows that riches themselves do not condemn, but pride and trust in wealth.

### Latin text

Credimus enim ministrum noui testamenti fuisse apostolum Paulum, cum scribens ad Timotheum diceret: Praecipe diuitibus huius mundi non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum. bene faciant, diuites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam, de qua et illi adulescenti dictum est: Si uis uenire ad uitam. puto, quod ista praecipiens diuites instruebat, non fallebat apostolus, qui non ait: Praecipe diuitibus huius mundi, uendant omnia, quae habent. dent pauperibus et sequantur dominum, sed: Non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum. ista superbia diuitem illum, qui iacentem ante ianuam suam contemnebat pauperem iustum, et ista spes in incerto diuitiarum, qua se propter purpuram et byssum et epulas splendidas beatum putabat, non ipsae diuitiae perduxerunt ad inferna tormenta.

### English translation (Claude)

For we believe that the apostle Paul was a minister of the New Testament when, writing to Timothy, he said: "Command the rich of this world not to be haughty, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches, but in the living God, who provides us all things richly to enjoy. Let them do good, be rich in good works, give readily, share, store up for themselves a good foundation for the future, that they may lay hold of true life," of which it was also said to that young man, "If you wish to come to life." I think the apostle, in giving these commands, was instructing the rich, not deceiving them; he did not say, "Command the rich of this world to sell all they have, give to the poor, and follow the Lord," but "not to be haughty, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches." It was this pride, and this hope in the uncertainty of riches, by which he thought himself happy because of purple, fine linen, and splendid feasts, not riches themselves, that brought that rich man, who despised the righteous poor man lying before his door, to the torments of the underworld.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:17: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 2 Cor 3:6; 1 Tim 6:17–19; Matt 19:17; Luke 16:19–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.26 (CSEL 44:475; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-26).

## Letter 157.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-27
- Source: CSEL 44:475–476
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's saying about the camel and the needle must be read with his assurance that what is impossible for men is easy for God.

### Latin text

An forte, quia dominus adiunxit et dixit: Amen dico uobis; difficile diues intrabit in regnum caelorum; et iterum dico uobis: Facilius camelus intrabit per foramen acus quam diues in regnum caelorum, ideo putant isti diuitem, etiamsi faciat ista, quae diuitibus praecipienda scripsit apostolus, in regnum caelorum intrare non posse? quid ergo est? utrum apostolus contra dominum loquitur, an isti nesciunt, quid loquitur? quid horum credat, eligat Christianus. puto melius nos credere istos nescire, quid loqui, quam Paulum contra dominum loqui. deinde cur non in consequentibus etiam ipsum dominum audiunt dicentem discipulis pro miseria diuitum contristatis: Quod hominibus inpossibile est, deo facile est?

### English translation (Claude)

Or perhaps, because the Lord added and said, "Amen I say to you, a rich man will enter the kingdom of heaven with difficulty; and again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to enter through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven," these people think that a rich man cannot enter the kingdom of heaven even if he does what the apostle wrote must be commanded to the rich? What, then? Does the apostle speak against the Lord, or do these people not know what they are saying? Let the Christian choose which of these to believe. I think it better for us to believe that they do not know what they are saying than that Paul speaks against the Lord. Further, why do they not listen to the Lord himself in what follows, saying to the disciples who were saddened by the plight of the rich: "What is impossible with men is easy with God"?

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:23: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:24: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:26: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:27: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:23–26 (Luke 18:27).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.27 (CSEL 44:475–476; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-27).

## Letter 157.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-28
- Source: CSEL 44:476
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians claim that the rich enter the kingdom only by selling everything, not by remaining rich and doing good.

### Latin text

Sed ideo, inquiunt, hoc dictum est, quia futurum erat, ut audito euangelio diuites uendito patrimonio erogatoque pauperibus dominum sequerentur et intrarent in regnum caelorum atque ita fieret, quod difficile uidebatur, non ut manentes in diuitiis suis praecepta apostoli custodiendo, id est non superbe sapiendo neque sperando in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo bene faciendo, facile tribuendo et communicando indigentibus ueram adprehenderent uitam, sed etiam ista praecepta apostolica uenditis omnibus suis rebus implerent.

### English translation (Claude)

"But this was said," they say, "because it was going to happen that, after hearing the gospel, rich men would sell their patrimony, distribute it to the poor, follow the Lord, and enter the kingdom of heaven, and so what seemed difficult would come about: not that, remaining in their riches and keeping the apostle's precepts, that is, not being haughty nor hoping in the uncertainty of riches but in the living God, doing good, giving readily and sharing with the needy, they would lay hold of true life, but that they would fulfill even these apostolic precepts by selling all their possessions."

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 6:17–19 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.28 (CSEL 44:476; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-28).

## Letter 157.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-29
- Source: CSEL 44:476–478
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whether the rich keep their wealth or sell it, salvation is God's work, not human power, and those who sell everything must also credit grace.

### Latin text

Haec si dicunt — scio quippe illos ea dicere —, non adtendunt primitus, quem ad modum dominus contra eorum dogma suam gratiam praedicauerit. non enim ait: Quod hominibus inpossibile uidetur, facile est hominibus, si uoluerint. sed: Quod hominibus, inquit, inpossibile est, deo facile est ostendens, quando ista recte fiunt, non fieri hominis potentia sed dei gratia. hoc ergo adtendant isti et, si reprehendunt eos, qui gloriantur in diuitiis suis, caueant ipsi in sua uirtute confidere; simul enim utrique reprehenduntur in psalmo, qui confidunt in uirtute sua et qui in abundantia diuitiarum suarum gloriantur. audiant itaque diuites: Quod hominibus inpossibile est, deo facile est et, siue manentes in diuitiis suis atque ex eis bona opera facientes siue illis uenditis et per indigentias pauperum distributis intrent in regnum caelorum, gratiae dei tribuant non propriis uiribus bonum suum. quod enim hominibus inpossibile est, non hominibus sed deo facile est. audiant hoc et isti et, si iam sua omnia uel uendiderunt et pauperibus tribuerunt uel adhuc id agunt atque disponunt et hoc modo praeparant intrare in regnum caelorum, non hoc tribuant uirtuti suae sed eidem gratiae diuinae. quod enim hominibus inpossibile est, non ipsis, quia et ipsi homines sunt, sed deo facile est. hoc quippe illis et apostolus dicit: Cum timore et tremore uestram ipsorum salutem operamini; deus enim est, qui operatur in uobis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate. certe ideo se dicunt de suis rebus uendendis perfectionis a domino suscepisse consilium, ut sequantur dominum, quoniam illic additum est: Et ueni, sequere me. cur ergo in his bonis, quae faciunt, de sua tantum uoluntate praesumunt nec audiunt dominum, quem sequi se dicunt, increpantem atque testantem: Sine me nihil potestis facere?

### English translation (Claude)

If they say this (and I know that they do say it), they do not first notice how the Lord preached his grace against their doctrine. For he did not say, "What seems impossible to men is easy for men, if they will," but "What is impossible with men," he says, "is easy with God," showing that when these things are done rightly, they are done not by human power but by the grace of God. Let these people notice this, then, and if they rebuke those who glory in their riches, let them beware of trusting in their own strength; for both are rebuked together in the psalm, those who trust in their own strength and those who glory in the abundance of their riches. Let the rich hear, then, "What is impossible with men is easy with God," and whether they enter the kingdom of heaven remaining in their riches and doing good works with them, or having sold them and distributed them to meet the needs of the poor, let them attribute their good to the grace of God, not to their own powers. For what is impossible with men is easy not with men but with God. Let these people hear this too, and if they have already sold all they had and given to the poor, or are still doing and arranging it, and in this way are preparing to enter the kingdom of heaven, let them attribute this not to their own strength but to the same divine grace. For what is impossible with men is easy not with them, since they too are men, but with God. For the apostle too says this to them: "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; for it is God who works in you both to will and to work for his good pleasure." Certainly they say that they received from the Lord the counsel of perfection about selling their possessions in order to follow the Lord, since there it was added: "And come, follow me." Why, then, in the good things they do, do they presume only on their own will, and not listen to the Lord, whom they say they follow, rebuking and testifying: "Without me you can do nothing"?

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:26: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 49:6 (48:7 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:21: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:26; Ps 49:6 (48:7 Vulgate); Phil 2:12–13; Matt 19:21; John 15:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.29 (CSEL 44:476–478; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-29).

## Letter 157.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-30
- Source: CSEL 44:478
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's household instructions presuppose that Christians keep houses and property, so he cannot have required the rich to sell everything.

### Latin text

Si autem apostolus ita dixit praecipe diuitibus huius mundi non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum, ut uendant omnia, quae possident, et ea pretia distribuendo indigentibus faciant, quod sequitur: Facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum. et aliter eos in regnum caelorum intrare posse non credit, fallit ergo eos: quorum domos tam diligenter doctrinae sanitate componit admonens et praecipiens, quales se praebere debeant uxores uiris, uiri uxoribus, filii parentibus, parentes filiis, serui dominis, domini seruis; nam quo modo haec agi possunt sine domo et sine aliqua re familiari?

### English translation (Claude)

But if the apostle said, "Command the rich of this world not to be haughty nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches," in the sense that they should sell all they possess and, by distributing the proceeds to the needy, do what follows, "give readily, share, store up for themselves a good foundation for the future," and does not believe that they can enter the kingdom of heaven otherwise, then he deceives those whose households he orders so carefully with sound doctrine, admonishing and commanding how wives ought to behave toward husbands, husbands toward wives, children toward parents, parents toward children, slaves toward masters, masters toward slaves. For how can these things be done without a house and without some household property?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:22: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:5: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 6:17–19; Eph 5:22–6:9 and Col 3:18–4:1 (household codes). The instructions to slaves and masters are reported as Augustine gives them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.30 (CSEL 44:478; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-30).

## Letter 157.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-31
- Source: CSEL 44:478–479
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's command to leave all, including a wife, applies when one must choose between spouse and Christ; otherwise divorce is forbidden except for sexual immorality, and Paul's counsel on mixed marriages applies.

### Latin text

An hoc eos mouet, quod ait dominus: Quicumque dimiserit omnia sua propter me, accipiet in hoc saeculo centuplum et in futuro uitam aeternam possidebit? aliud est dimiserit aliud uendiderit; nam in his, quae dimittenda mandauit, etiam uxor commemorata est, quam nullis humanis legibus licet uendere, Christi autem legibus nec dimittere excepta causa fornicationis. quid sibi ergo uolunt ista praecepta — non enim possunt inter se esse contraria —, nisi quia incurrit aliquando necessitatis articulus, ubi aut uxor dimittatur aut Christus, ut alia omittam, si ipsi uxori maritus displicuerit Christianus eique proposuerit aut a se diuortium aut a Christo? hic ille quid eligat nisi Christum et dimittat uxorem laudabiliter propter Christum? ambobus quippe Christianis dominus praecepit, ne quisquam dimittat uxorem excepta causa fornicationis. ubi autem quaelibet in eis persona infidelis est, consilium apostoli adtenditur, ut, si infidelis consentit habitare cum uiro fideli, uir non dimittat uxorem, similiter et uxor fidelis uirum, si cum illa habitare consenserit. quod si infidelis, inquit, discedit, discedat; non est enim seruituti subiectus frater aut soror in huius modi, id est si infidelis noluerit esse cum coniuge fideli, hic agnoscat fidelis suam libertatem, ne ita se subiectum deputet seruituti, ut ipsam dimittat fidem, ne coniugem amittat infidelem.

### English translation (Claude)

Or does what the Lord said move them: "Whoever has left all his things for my sake will receive a hundredfold in this world and in the world to come will possess eternal life"? "Left" is one thing, "sold" another. For among the things he commanded to be left a wife is also mentioned, whom no human laws permit to be sold, and the laws of Christ do not permit to be dismissed, except for the cause of sexual immorality. What, then, do these precepts mean (for they cannot be contrary to one another), except that sometimes a moment of necessity arises when either the wife must be left or Christ? To pass over other cases, suppose a Christian husband has displeased his wife herself and she puts before him the choice of divorce either from her or from Christ. What should he choose here but Christ, and leave his wife, laudably, for Christ's sake? For to spouses who are both Christians the Lord commanded that no one dismiss his wife except for the cause of sexual immorality. But where one of the two persons is an unbeliever, the counsel of the apostle is heeded, that, if the unbelieving wife consents to live with a believing husband, the husband should not dismiss his wife; likewise also the believing wife her husband, if he consents to live with her. "But if the unbeliever departs," he says, "let him depart; for a brother or sister is not subject to bondage in such cases"; that is, if the unbelieving spouse does not wish to be with the believing spouse, let the believer here recognize his freedom, so as not to think himself so subject to bondage as to abandon the faith itself in order not to lose the unbelieving spouse.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:29: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 10:29: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 18:29: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:32: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:9: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:13: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:29 (Mark 10:29–30; Luke 18:29–30); Matt 5:32 and 19:9 (except for sexual immorality, fornicatio); 1 Cor 7:12–15. Augustine reads 1 Cor 7:15 as freeing the believer from having to give up the faith to keep an unbelieving spouse; he says nothing here about remarriage. Translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.31 (CSEL 44:478–479; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-31).

## Letter 157.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-32
- Source: CSEL 44:479–480
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The command to leave house and lands applies when persecution forces a choice between possessions and Christ; then the rich must give them up.

### Latin text

Hoc et de filiis atque parentibus, hoc et de fratribus ac sororibus intellegitur propter Christum esse omnes dimittendos, cum proponitur ista condicio, ut Christum dimittat, si illos secum habere desiderat. hoc ergo et de domo atque agris, hoc et de his rebus, quae iure pecuniario possidentur, hoc loco accipiendum est. simul enim etiam de his non ait: Quicumque uendiderit propter me, quae utique licitum est uendere, sed: Quicumque dimiserit. fieri enim potest, ut dicatur Christiano ab aliqua potestate: Aut Christianus non eris aut, si in hoc permanere uolueris, domum possessionesque non habebis. tum uero etiam illi diuites, qui in suis diuitiis sic statuerant permanere, ut ex earum bonis operibus promererentur deum, haec dimittant potius propter Christum quam propter haec Christum, ut accipiant in hoc saeculo centuplum, cuius numeri perfectione significantur omnia — fidelis quippe hominis totus mundus diuitiarum est fiuntque hoc modo quasi nihil habentes et omnia possidentes —, et in futuro saeculo possideant uitam aeternam, ne propter ista dimisso Christo in mortem praecipitentur aeternam.

### English translation (Claude)

This is understood also of children and parents, and of brothers and sisters: that all are to be left for Christ's sake when this condition is put forward, that one must leave Christ if one wishes to keep them. This, then, is to be taken in this passage also of house and fields, and of the things possessed by right of money. For at the same time he does not say of these either, "Whoever has sold for my sake," things which certainly may lawfully be sold, but "Whoever has left." For it may happen that some power says to a Christian: "Either you will not be a Christian, or, if you wish to remain one, you will have no house or possessions." Then indeed even those rich men who had resolved to remain in their riches so as to win God by good works done with them should leave these things for Christ's sake rather than Christ for these things' sake, so that they may receive in this world a hundredfold, by the perfection of which number all things are signified (for "to the faithful man the whole world is wealth," and in this way they become "as having nothing and possessing all things"), and in the world to come possess eternal life, lest, having left Christ for these things, they be cast headlong into eternal death.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:29: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 17:6: quotation, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 6:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:29; Prov 17:6 (the Septuagint addition, 17:6a); 2 Cor 6:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.32 (CSEL 44:479–480; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-32).

## Letter 157.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-33
- Source: CSEL 44:480
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even weaker Christians who keep their wealth must, when it comes to the choice, give it up rather than Christ, having counted the cost when they came to faith.

### Latin text

Hac quippe lege et condicione non illi tantum, qui mentis excellentia perfectionis consilium receperunt, ut uendita sua pauperibus distribuerent et humeris ab omni saeculi huius sarcina liberioribus leuem Christi sarcinam ferrent, sed etiam quisquis infirmior et illi gloriosissimae perfectioni minus idoneus, qui tamen se meminit ueraciter esse Christianum, cum audierit sibi proponi, quod, nisi haec omnia dimiserit, dimissurus est Christum, adprehendet potius turrem fortitudinis a facie inimici, quia, cum eam in sua aedificaret fide, computauit sumptus, quibus perfici posset, id est eo animo accessit ad fidem, ut huic saeculo non solum uerbis renuntiaret, quia, et si emit aliquid, tamquam non possidens erat, et si utebatur mundo, tamquam non utens erat non sperans in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo.

### English translation (Claude)

By this law and condition, indeed, not only those who by excellence of mind have received the counsel of perfection, to sell their goods, distribute them to the poor, and with shoulders freer of every burden of this world bear the light burden of Christ, but also anyone weaker and less fit for that most glorious perfection, who nevertheless remembers that he is truly a Christian, when he hears it put to him that unless he leaves all these things he is going to leave Christ, will rather take hold of the tower of strength against the face of the enemy; because, when he was building it in his faith, he counted the cost by which it could be completed, that is, he came to the faith with the intention of renouncing this world not in words only; because, even if he bought anything, he was as one not possessing, and if he used the world, he was as one not using it, not hoping in the uncertainty of riches but in the living God.

### Scripture references

- Matt 11:30: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 61:3 (60:4 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:28: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:30: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:31: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 11:30; Ps 61:3 (60:4 Vulgate); Luke 14:28; 1 Cor 7:30–31; 1 Tim 6:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.33 (CSEL 44:480; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-33).

## Letter 157.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-34
- Source: CSEL 44:480–482
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Every Christian renounces his possessions either by giving them away or by being ready to lose them for Christ; those who renounce the world only in words fail when tested.

### Latin text

Cum enim omnis, qui renuntiat huic saeculo, sine dubio renuntiet omnibus, quae sunt eius, ut Christi possit esse discipulus — ipse enim, cum de sumptibus ad turris aedificium necessariis et de bello aduersus regem alterum praeparando similitudines praemisisset, adiunxit sic: Qui non renuntiat omnibus, quae sunt eius, non potest meus discipulus esse —, profecto renuntiat etiam diuitiis suis, si quas habet, aut sic, ut eas omnino non diligens totas distribuat indigentibus et superfluis exoneretur sarcinis, aut sic, ut plus diligens Christum spem ab eis transferat in ipsum atque ita utatur illis, ut facile tribuens et communicans thesaurizet in caelo paratusque sit, quem ad modum parentes et filios et fratres et uxorem, hoc modo et istas relinquere, si talis condicio proposita fuerit, ut nisi dimisso Christo eas habere non possit. nam si aliter huic saeculo renuntiat, quando accedit ad fidei sacramentum, facit, quod de lapsis beatus Cyprianus ingemit dicens: Saeculo uerbis solis et non factis renuntiantes. de hoc quippe dicitur, cum ueniente temptatione magis ista metuit amittere quam Christum negare: Ecce homo, qui coepit aedificare et non potuit perficere. ipse est etiam, qui, cum adhuc longe esset aduersarius eius, mittit legatos quaerens pacem, id est nondum affligente sed adhuc imminente ac minante temptatione, ut his non careat, quae plus diligit, ad relinquendum Christum negandumque consentit. et multi sunt tales, qui etiam putant sibi ad augendas opes suas et multiplicanda delectamenta terrena religionem suffragari debere Christianam.

### English translation (Claude)

For since everyone who renounces this world undoubtedly renounces all that is his, so that he may be Christ's disciple (for he himself, when he had first given the comparisons of the cost needed to build a tower and of preparing for war against another king, added: "Whoever does not renounce all that is his cannot be my disciple"), he certainly renounces also his riches, if he has any, either in such a way that, not loving them at all, he distributes them all to the needy and is relieved of superfluous burdens, or in such a way that, loving Christ more, he transfers his hope from them to him and so uses them that, giving readily and sharing, he stores up treasure in heaven and is ready to leave them too, in the same way as parents, children, brothers, and wife, if such a condition is put to him that he cannot have them except by leaving Christ. For if he renounces this world otherwise when he comes to the sacrament of faith, he does what blessed Cyprian laments concerning the lapsed, saying: "renouncing the world in words alone and not in deeds." For of him, when at the coming of temptation he fears to lose these things more than to deny Christ, it is said: "Behold a man who began to build and could not finish." He is also the one who, while his adversary is still far off, sends envoys seeking peace; that is, when temptation is not yet afflicting him but still impending and threatening, he consents to leave and deny Christ so as not to be deprived of those things he loves more. And there are many such people, who even think that the Christian religion ought to support them in increasing their wealth and multiplying earthly delights.

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:33: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:28: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 14:30: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:32: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Laps. 30 (On the Lapsed): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 14:28–33. Cyprian, On the Lapsed 30. "The sacrament of faith": baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.34 (CSEL 44:480–482; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-34).

## Letter 157.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-35
- Source: CSEL 44:482
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: True Christian rich people use their wealth for hospitality and charity and are ready to lose wealth, family, and life for Christ.

### Latin text

Sed non sunt tales diuites Christiani, qui, licet ista teneant, non tamen ab eis ita tenentur, ut haec Christo anteponant, quia ueraci corde saeculo renuntiarunt, ut nullam spem in talibus ponant. hi uxores et filios uniuersasque familias ad Christianam religionem tenendam sana erudiunt disciplina; horum domus hospitalitate feruentes recipiunt iustum in nomine iusti, ut mercedem iusti accipiant; frangunt esurienti panem suum, nudum uestiunt, captiuum redimunt, thesaurizant sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam; et si forte pro fide Christi pecuniaria damna perpetienda sunt, oderunt diuitias suas; si suorum orbitates uel separationes pro Christo minatur hic mundus, oderunt parentes, fratres, filios, uxores; postremo si de ipsa huius corporis uita cum aduersario paciscendum est, ne desertus deserat Christus, oderunt insuper et animam suam. de his quippe omnibus mandatum acceperunt, quod aliter discipuli Christi esse non possint.

### English translation (Claude)

But such are not the Christian rich who, though they hold these things, are not so held by them as to prefer them to Christ, because with a truthful heart they have renounced the world so as to place no hope in such things. These train their wives, children, and whole households with sound discipline to hold fast to the Christian religion; their houses, fervent in hospitality, receive a righteous man in the name of a righteous man, so as to receive a righteous man's reward; they break their bread to the hungry, clothe the naked, ransom the captive, store up for themselves a good foundation for the future, that they may lay hold of true life; and if perhaps they must suffer financial losses for the faith of Christ, they hate their riches; if this world threatens them with the bereavement or separation of their own for Christ's sake, they hate parents, brothers, children, wives; finally, if they must bargain with the adversary over the very life of this body, lest Christ desert them if they desert him, they hate even their own soul. For concerning all these things they have received the command that otherwise they cannot be Christ's disciples.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:41: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 58:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:36: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 10:41; Isa 58:7; Matt 25:36; 1 Tim 6:19; Luke 14:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.35 (CSEL 44:482; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-35).

## Letter 157.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-36
- Source: CSEL 44:482–483
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many rich Christians became martyrs, and those who keep their wealth but show mercy to Christ in the needy will stand at his right hand.

### Latin text

Nec tamen, quia praeceptum est eis, ut oderint pro Christo et animas suas, uendendas eas habent aut inlatis sibi manibus effundendas, sed parati sunt eas amittere pro Christi nomine moriendo, ne mortui uiuant Christum negando. sic et diuitias, ad quas uendendas parati non fuerunt monente Christo, ad perdendas debent parati esse pro Christo, ne cum eis pereant perdito Christo. habemus hinc utriusque sexus diuites clarissimasque personas martyrii gloria sublimatas. ita multi, quos rerum suarum uenditione piguerat ante perfici, Christi imitata passione sunt repente perfecti et, qui nonnulla infirmitate carnis et sanguinis suis diuitiis pepercerunt, subito aduersus peccatum pro fide usque ad sanguinem certauerunt. quibus autem non prouenit corona martyrii neque illius perfectionis de uendendis rebus suis consilium tam praeclarum et tam grande receperunt et tamen a damnabilibus immunes criminibus esurientem Christum pauerunt, sitienti potum dederunt, nudum uestierunt, peregrinantem susceperunt, non sedebunt quidem cum Christo sublimiter iudicaturi, sed ad ipsius dexteram stabunt misericorditer iudicandi; beati enim misericordes, quoniam ipsorum miserebitur, et iudicium sine misericordia illi, qui non fecit misericordiam; superexultat autem misericordia iudicio.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet, because they have been commanded to hate even their own souls for Christ, they do not hold them as things to be sold or to be poured out by laying hands on themselves, but they are ready to lose them by dying for Christ's name, lest, dead, they live by denying Christ. So too riches, which they were not ready to sell at Christ's counsel, they ought to be ready to lose for Christ, lest they perish with them, having lost Christ. We have from this source rich persons of both sexes and of the highest rank exalted by the glory of martyrdom. Thus many who before had been reluctant to be perfected by selling their goods were suddenly perfected by imitating Christ's passion; and those who, through some weakness of flesh and blood, had spared their riches suddenly contended against sin for the faith even to blood. But those to whom the crown of martyrdom has not come, and who have not received that counsel of perfection, so splendid and so great, about selling their goods, yet, free from damnable crimes, have fed Christ when he was hungry, given him drink when thirsty, clothed him when naked, and taken him in when a stranger, will not indeed sit with Christ on high to judge, but will stand at his right hand to be judged mercifully; for "blessed are the merciful, for they will obtain mercy," and "judgment without mercy to him who has shown no mercy; but mercy triumphs over judgment."

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:26: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 12:4: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:35: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:36: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 19:28: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 25:33: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:7: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 14:26; Heb 12:4; Matt 25:35–36; Matt 19:28; Matt 25:33; Matt 5:7; Jas 2:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.36 (CSEL 44:482–483; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-36).

## Letter 157.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-37
- Source: CSEL 44:483–485
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagian ascetics should urge higher things without condemning lesser ones, and should welcome the godly rich who often support them.

### Latin text

Proinde isti desinant contra scripturas loqui et in suis exhortationibus ad maiora sic excitent, ut minora non damnent. non enim et sanctam uirginitatem aliter exhortando persuadere possunt, nisi coniugalia uincula damnauerint, cum docente apostolo unusquisque donum proprium habeat a deo alius sic alius autem sic. ambulent itaque perfectionis uiam uenditis suis omnibus rebus et misericorditer erogatis; sed si uere pauperes Christi sunt et non sibi sed Christo colligunt, infirmiora eius membra quare puniant, antequam sedes iudiciarias acceperunt? si enim tales erunt, qualibus dominus dicit: Sedebitis super XII sedes iudicantes XII tribus Israhel et de qualibus apostolus ait: Nescitis, quoniam angelos iudicabimus? praeparent se potius non criminosos sed religiosos diuites recipere in tabernacula aeterna, a quibus amici facti sunt de mammona iniquitatis. puto enim, quod quidam eorum, qui haec inpudenter atque inprudenter garriunt, a diuitibus Christianis et piis in suis necessitatibus sustentantur. habet enim ecclesia quodam modo suos milites et quodam modo prouinciales, unde dicit apostolus: Quis militat suis stipendiis umquam? habet uineam et plantatores, habet gregem et pastores, unde consequenter dicit: Quis plantat uineam et de fructu eius non edet? quis pascit gregem et de lacte gregis non percipit? quamuis talia disputare, qualia isti disputant, non sit militare sed rebellare, non sit plantare uineam sed eradicare, non sit pascendos congregare sed perdendos a grege separare.

### English translation (Claude)

So let these people stop speaking against the Scriptures, and in their exhortations let them rouse people to greater things in such a way as not to condemn the lesser. For they cannot persuade people to holy virginity by exhortation otherwise than by condemning the bonds of marriage, whereas, as the apostle teaches, "each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and another of another." Let them walk the way of perfection, then, having sold all their possessions and distributed them mercifully; but if they are truly Christ's poor and gather not for themselves but for Christ, why do they punish his weaker members before they have received the seats of judgment? For if they are to be such as those to whom the Lord says, "You will sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel," and of whom the apostle says, "Do you not know that we shall judge angels?", let them rather prepare to receive into the eternal dwellings rich people, not criminal but religious, by whom they have been made friends out of the mammon of iniquity. For I think that some of those who chatter these things shamelessly and imprudently are supported in their needs by Christian and godly rich people. For the church has in a way its soldiers and in a way its provincials, which is why the apostle says: "Who ever serves as a soldier at his own expense?" It has a vineyard and planters, a flock and shepherds, which is why he goes on to say: "Who plants a vineyard and does not eat of its fruit? Who tends a flock and does not get the milk of the flock?" Although to dispute as these people dispute is not to serve as a soldier but to rebel, not to plant a vineyard but to uproot it, not to gather people to be fed but to separate them from the flock to be destroyed.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:9: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 9:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's charge, "they cannot persuade ... otherwise than by condemning marriage," is ironic: he means that this would be the same error. Scripture: 1 Cor 7:7; Matt 19:28; 1 Cor 6:3; Luke 16:9; 1 Cor 9:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.37 (CSEL 44:483–485; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-37).

## Letter 157.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-38
- Source: CSEL 44:485
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who live on the gifts of the rich should not condemn them, just as monks who work with their hands do not condemn those who live on gifts.

### Latin text

Sicut autem ipsi, qui diuitum religiosis obsequiis aluntur atque uestiuntur — neque enim ad suas necessitates nihil accipiunt nisi ab eis, qui res suas uendunt —, non tamen iudicantur atque damnantur ab excellentioribus Christi membris, qui maiore uirtute, quam multum commendat apostolus, suis se manibus transigunt, sic nec isti damnare debent inferioris meriti Christianos, quorum opibus transiguntur, sed recte uiuendo et recte docendo magis eis dicere: Si nos uobis spiritalia seminauimus, magnum est, si uestra carnalia metamus? multo quippe minore inpudentia serui dei, qui manuum suarum honestis operibus uenditis uiuunt, damnant istos, a quibus nihil accipiunt, quam isti, qui propter aliquam corporis infirmitatem non ualentes manibus operari damnant eos ipsos, de quorum facultatibus uiuunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But just as these men, who are fed and clothed by the religious services of the rich (for they do not receive what they need only from those who sell their goods), are nevertheless not judged and condemned by the more excellent members of Christ who, by a greater virtue which the apostle strongly commends, support themselves with their own hands; so they too ought not to condemn Christians of lesser merit by whose means they are supported, but rather, by living rightly and teaching rightly, say to them: "If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it a great thing if we reap your material things?" For the servants of God who live by selling the honest works of their hands would condemn those from whom they receive nothing with much less shamelessness than these men, who, unable to work with their hands because of some bodily weakness, condemn the very people on whose resources they live.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 4:11: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Thess 3:8: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 9:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Thess 4:11 and 2 Thess 3:8 (working with one's hands); 1 Cor 9:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.38 (CSEL 44:485; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-38).

## Letter 157.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-39
- Source: CSEL 44:485–487
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine has himself embraced voluntary poverty and urges it on others, but without condemning Christians who live chastely in marriage and use their wealth well.

### Latin text

Ego, qui haec scribo, perfectionem, de qua dominus locutus est, quando ait diuiti adulescenti: Vade, uende omnia, quae habes, et da pauperibus et habebis thesaurum in caelo et ueni, sequere me, uehementer adamaui et non meis uiribus sed gratia ipsius adiuuante sic feci. neque enim, quia diues non fui, ideo minus mihi inputabitur; nam neque ipsi apostoli, qui priores hoc fecerunt, diuites fuerunt. sed totum mundum dimittit, qui et illud, quod habet et quod optabat habere, dimittit. quantum autem in hac perfectionis uia profecerim, magis quidem noui ego quam quisquam alius homo, sed magis deus quam ego. et ad hoc propositum, quantis possum uiribus, alios exhortor et in nomine domini habeo consortes, quibus hoc per meum ministerium persuasum est sic tamen, ut praecipue sana doctrina teneatur nec eos, qui ista non faciunt, uana contumacia iudicemus dicentes eis nihil prodesse, quod pudice quamuis coniugaliter uiuunt, quod domos suas et familias Christiane regunt, quod operibus misericordiae sibi thesaurizant in posterum, ne ista disputando non scripturarum sanctarum tractatores sed earum accusatores inueniamur. quod ideo commemoraui, quoniam isti, quando talia dicere prohibentur ab eis, qui hoc domini consilium non ceperunt, respondent eos ideo talia disputari nolle, quoniam uitiis suis fauent et dominica praecepta implere detractant, quasi non, ut de his taceam, qui licet infirmiores religiose tamen utuntur diuitiis, etiam ipsi cupidi et auari male his utentes et in terreno thesauro cor luteum configentes, quia et ipsos necesse est usque ad finem portet ecclesia sicut illa retia usque ad litus pisces malos, tolerabiliores in ea sunt quam isti, qui talia sermocinando et disseminando ita se uideri magnos uolunt, quia diuitias suas uel quantulacumque patrimonia ex praecepto domini uendiderunt, ut eius hereditatem, quae usque ad fines terrae dilatatur atque diffunditur, hac doctrina non sana perturbare atque euertere moliantur.

### English translation (Claude)

I who write this have greatly loved the perfection of which the Lord spoke when he said to the rich young man, "Go, sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me," and I have done so, not by my own powers but with his grace helping. Nor will it be counted the less to me because I was not rich; for neither were the apostles themselves, who first did this, rich. But he leaves the whole world who leaves both what he has and what he wished to have. How far I have advanced in this way of perfection I indeed know better than any other human being, but God knows better than I. And to this way of life I exhort others with all the strength I can, and in the name of the Lord I have companions who have been persuaded of it through my ministry; yet in such a way that sound doctrine is held above all, and that we do not judge with vain stubbornness those who do not do this, telling them that it profits them nothing that they live chastely though in marriage, that they rule their houses and households in a Christian way, that they store up for themselves for the future by works of mercy, lest by such disputing we be found not expounders of the holy Scriptures but their accusers. I have mentioned this because these people, when they are forbidden to say such things by those who have not taken up this counsel of the Lord, answer that these do not want such things discussed because they favor their own vices and refuse to fulfill the Lord's precepts. As if (to say nothing of those who, though weaker, use their riches religiously) even the greedy and avaricious, who use them badly and fix their earthen heart on earthly treasure, whom too the church must bear until the end, as those nets bore the bad fish to the shore, were not more tolerable in it than these people, who, by talking and spreading such things, so want to seem great because they have sold their riches or their patrimonies, however small, by the Lord's precept, that by this unsound doctrine they strive to disturb and overturn his inheritance, which is spread and extended to the ends of the earth.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:47: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 2:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 19:21; Matt 13:47–48; Ps 2:8. Augustine's own renunciation of his property and his monastic community at Hippo are meant.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.39 (CSEL 44:485–487; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-39).

## Letter 157.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-40
- Source: CSEL 44:487–488
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine briefly answers that the church on earth contains good and bad, and advises avoiding oaths, while noting that Paul himself swore.

### Latin text

Unde quia ex hac quidem occasione sed tamen iam breuiter dixi, quid etiam de ecclesia Christi in hoc saeculo sentiam, id est quia usque ad huius saeculi finem necesse est portet bonos et malos, quoniam et hoc inter tuas quaestiones interrogasti, prolixam epistulam iam tandem aliquando concludam. Iurationem autem caue, quantum potes. melius quippe nec uerum iuratur, quam iurandi consuetudine et in periurium saepe caditur et semper periurio propinquatur. sed illi, quantum aliquos eorum audiui, quid sit iurare, prorsus ignorant; putant enim se non iurare, quando in ore habent: Scit deus et: Testis est deus et: Testem deum inuoco super animam meam, quia non dicitur: Per deum et quia talia reperiuntur in apostolo Paulo. sed etiam illa ibi contra eos inuenta est, quam confitetur esse iurationem, ubi ait apostolus: Cotidie morior per uestram gloriam, fratres, quam habeo in Christo Iesu domino nostro. in Graecis enim codicibus reperitur omnino hanc esse iurationem, ne quisquam in Latina lingua hoc sic intellegat dictum per uestram gloriam, quo modo dictum est per meum aduentum iterum ad uos et multa similia, ubi dicitur per aliquid et non est iuratio. sed non ideo, quia in suis litteris iurauit apostolus, uir in ueritate firmissimus, ludus nobis debet esse iuratio. multo enim tutius, ut dixi, quantum ad nos adtinet, numquam iuramus, ut sit in ore nostro: Est, est; non, non, sicut dominus monet, non quia peccatum est uerum iurare, sed quia grauissimum peccatum est falsum iurare, quo citius cadit, qui consueuit iurare.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, on this occasion but now briefly, I have said what I also think about the church of Christ in this world, namely that until the end of this world it must bear good and evil (for this too you asked among your questions), I shall now at last conclude this long letter. As for swearing, avoid it as much as you can. For it is better not to swear even what is true than, by the habit of swearing, often to fall into perjury and always to be close to perjury. But those people, as far as I have heard some of them, are altogether ignorant of what swearing is; for they think they are not swearing when they have on their lips "God knows," and "God is witness," and "I call God as witness upon my soul," because "by God" is not said, and because such things are found in the apostle Paul. But there is also found there, against them, one which they admit to be an oath, where the apostle says: "I die daily, by your glory, brothers, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord." For in the Greek manuscripts it is found that this is altogether an oath, lest anyone in the Latin language should understand "by your glory" as said in the way "by my coming to you again" is said, and many similar expressions, where "by" something is said and it is not an oath. But just because the apostle, a man most firm in truth, swore in his letters, swearing ought not to be a game for us. For it is much safer, as I said, as far as we are concerned, never to swear, so that there may be in our mouth "Yes, yes; no, no," as the Lord warns; not because it is a sin to swear what is true, but because it is a most grievous sin to swear falsely, into which one who is accustomed to swear falls the more quickly.

### Scripture references

- Matt 13:30: echo, medium confidence
- Rom 1:9: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:20: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 15:31: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:37: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 13:30, 47–48 (echo); Rom 1:9, 2 Cor 1:23, Gal 1:20 (Paul's calls on God as witness); 1 Cor 15:31 (Greek νή, an oath particle); Phil 1:26; Matt 5:37.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.40 (CSEL 44:487–488; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-40).

## Letter 157.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-41
- Source: CSEL 44:488
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes, asking Hilary to send word of what the brothers at Syracuse argue against the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Accepisti, quid mihi uidetur; melius exponant ista meliores, non isti, quorum iam noui sententiam reprobandam, sed alii qui ueraciter possunt. nam et ego paratior sum discere quam docere et tu magnum conferes beneficium, si ea, quae illic a sanctis fratribus aduersus istorum uaniloquia disseruntur, non me facias ignorare. in domino recte et feliciter uiuas, dilectissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

You have received what I think; let better men expound these things better, not these people, whose opinion I already know must be rejected, but others who can do so truthfully. For I too am readier to learn than to teach, and you will confer a great kindness if you do not leave me ignorant of what is argued there by the holy brothers against the empty talk of these people. May you live rightly and happily in the Lord, most beloved son.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 157.41 (CSEL 44:488; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/157-22/#p-157-41).

## Letter 158.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-1
- Source: CSEL 44:488–489
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius, bishop of Uzalis, tells Augustine about his young secretary, a presbyter's son, whom he had come to love as a friend.

### Latin text

Debitum flagito epistulae, quam misi, et uolui primo illud discere, quod interrogaui, et postea hoc requirere. sed narrem, quia dignaris, quae res me fecit inpatientem, ut et id festinarem nosse, si fieri potest in hac uita. quendam puerum habui presbyteri Armeni Memlonitani filium notarium. hunc iam in saeculo mergentem — nam scholastico proconsulis excipiebat — per meam eruit deus humilitatem. fuit quidem, ut puerilis aetas habet, promptus, aliquantulum inquietus, sed accedente aetate — nam uigensimo et secundo anno soluitur - ita eum grauitas morum et custos bona uita ornauit, ut satis delectet eius habere memoriam. erat autem strenuus in notis et in scribendo bene laboriosus, studiosus quoque esse coeperat lectionis, ut ipse meam tarditatem causa legendi nocturnis horis exhortaretur; nam aliquanto tempore nocte mihi ipse legebat, cum omnia siluissent, nec uolebat praeterire lectionem, nisi intellexisset, et tertio et quarto. repetebat et nec dimittebat, nisi sibi apparuisset, quod quaerebat. coeperam eum non quasi puerum et notarium habere sed amicum quendam satis necessarium et suauem. delectabant me enim et fabulae ipsius.

### English translation (Claude)

I press for the reply owed to the letter I sent; and I would have liked first to learn what I asked and afterward to inquire into this. But let me tell, since you deign to hear it, what made me impatient, so that I hasten to know this too, if it can be known in this life. I had a certain young man as my secretary, the son of Armenius, a presbyter of Melonita. When he was already sinking into the world (for he was taking down shorthand for the proconsul's legal assessor), God rescued him through my lowliness. He was, as boyhood is, quick and somewhat restless; but as he grew older (for he died in his twenty-second year), gravity of character and a good, watchful life so adorned him that it is a great delight to keep his memory. He was skilled in shorthand and very diligent in writing; he had also begun to be devoted to reading, so that he himself urged my sluggishness to read in the night hours; for for some time he used to read to me himself at night when all was quiet, and he would not pass over a passage unless he had understood it, but would repeat it a third and a fourth time and not let it go until what he sought was clear to him. I had begun to regard him not as a boy and a secretary but as a friend, quite close and dear; for even his conversation delighted me.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Evodius to Augustine (414). The place name appears as "Memlonitani" in the digital text (NPNF: Melonita); the presbyter's name may be Armenius or "an Armenian"; uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.1 (CSEL 44:488–489; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-1).

## Letter 158.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-2
- Source: CSEL 44:489–490
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The young man died singing psalms and signing himself with the cross, and Evodius held three days of hymns and offered the Eucharist on the third day.

### Latin text

Optabat quoque, quod ei praestitum est, dissolui et esse cum Christo. nam aegrotauit sedecim diebus apud parentes suos et memor sui de scripturis paene tota aegritudine loquebatur. sed ut ad finem uitae proximus esse coepit, psallebat audientibus omnibus: Desiderat et properat anima mea ad atria dei et post hoc iterum psallebat: Inpinguasti in oleo caput meum et poculum tuum inebrians quam praeclarum est! ibi fuit occupatus, hac se oblectabat consolatione. deinde cum solui coepisset, signare se coepit in fronte, ita ut sic descenderet manus ad os, quod sibi cupiebat signare, cum iam interior homo et bene renouatus de die in diem domum luteam dimisisset. mihi tantum gaudium adcreuit, ut arbitrer, quod dimisso proprio corpore in meum animum ingressus sit et ibi mihi quandam luciditatem praesentiae suae praestet. quia liberatione et securitate illius nimis gaudeo, dici non potest. non enim leuem ei exhibui sollicitudinem timens aetati adulescentis. nam curaui ei eo quaerere, ne forte feminae contagione fuisset pollutus; liberum se esse testatus est, magis ut nostrum gaudium cumularetur. solutus est ergo. exequias praebuimus satis honorabiles et dignas tantae animae; nam per triduum hymnis dominum conlaudauimus super sepulcrum ipsius et redemptionis sacramenta tertio die obtulimus.

### English translation (Claude)

He also desired, and it was granted him, to depart and be with Christ. For he was ill for sixteen days at his parents' house, and, mindful of himself, he spoke of the Scriptures through almost the whole of his illness. But as he began to be near the end of his life, he sang psalms in the hearing of all: "My soul longs and hastens to the courts of God," and after this again he sang: "You have anointed my head with oil, and how glorious is your cup that inebriates!" With this he was occupied, in this consolation he delighted. Then, when he began to be released, he began to sign himself on the forehead, so that his hand was coming down to his mouth, which he wished to sign too, when the inner man, well renewed from day to day, had already left the house of clay. Such joy has grown in me that I think that, having left his own body, he has entered my mind and there grants me a certain brightness of his presence. How greatly I rejoice in his release and security cannot be told. For I had shown no slight concern for him, fearing for his youthful age. Indeed, I took care to ask him whether perhaps he had been defiled by contact with a woman; he testified that he was free, which heaped up our joy all the more. So he was released. We provided obsequies quite honorable and worthy of so great a soul; for during three days we praised the Lord with hymns over his tomb, and on the third day we offered the sacraments of redemption.

### Scripture references

- Phil 1:23: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 84:2 (83:3 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 23:5 (22:5 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- Job 4:19: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Phil 1:23; Ps 84:2 (83:3 Vulgate); Ps 23:5 (22:5 Vulgate); 2 Cor 4:16; Job 4:19 (house of clay). "The sacraments of redemption": the Eucharist offered for the dead.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.2 (CSEL 44:489–490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-2).

## Letter 158.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-3
- Source: CSEL 44:490
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A widow dreamed of a palace being prepared in heaven for the young man and his body being taken up, with roses springing from his tomb.

### Latin text

Sed ecce post biduum quaedam uidua honesta Urbica de, Figentibus, quae duodecim se annos uiduari dicebat, ancilla dei, somnium uidit tale. uidet quendam diaconum ante quadriennium corpore exectum cum seruis et ancillis dei uirginibus et uiduis palatium praeparare. ornabatur autem ita, ut claritas loci fulsisset, ut locus omnis argenteus putaretur. cum illa studiosius interrogasset, cuinam haec praepararentur, respondit ille diaconus puero, qui hesterno adsumptus est, filio presbyteri praeparari. et in eodem palatio quendam senem candidatum apparuisse, qui iuberet duobus candidatis, ut pergerent et corpus ablatum de sepulcro ad caelum leuassent. cumque, inquit, de sepulcro corpus fuisset adsumptum atque in caelum leuatum, rami rosarum uirginum — sic enim clausae appellari solent — de eodem sepulcro surrexisse.

### English translation (Claude)

But behold, two days later, a certain respectable widow of Figentes, Urbica, a servant of God, who said she had been a widow for twelve years, saw a dream of this kind. She sees a certain deacon, who had departed from the body four years earlier, preparing a palace with servants and handmaids of God, virgins and widows. It was being adorned so that the brightness of the place shone and the whole place was thought to be of silver. When she inquired more eagerly for whom these things were being prepared, that deacon answered that they were being prepared for the young man, the presbyter's son, who had been taken up the day before. And in the same palace an old man in white appeared, who ordered two men in white to go and take the body from the tomb and lift it to heaven. And when, she said, the body had been taken from the tomb and lifted into heaven, branches of virgin roses (for so the closed ones are usually called) sprang up from the same tomb.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.3 (CSEL 44:490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-3).

## Letter 158.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-4
- Source: CSEL 44:490–491
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks what the soul is like after leaving the body, since even in the body it struggles and conquers through Christ.

### Latin text

Narraui, quid fuerit gestum. modo quaestionem audire dignare et doce, quod quaero. cogit enim me istius animae migratio talia percontari. cum in corpore sumus. est nobis sensus interior sollers pro agilitate studii nostri et tanto uigilantior et feruentior, quanto fuerimus studiosiores, et adhuc impedimento corporis retardari nos uidetur esse probabile. quis autem omnia, quae animus ex corpore patitur, poterit enarrare? inter has turbas et molestias ex suggestionibus, ex temptationibus, ex necessitatibus diuersisque calamitatibus uenientes fortitudinem suam non deserit animus, resistit, uincit. aliquando uincitur. tamen, quoniam meminit sui, agilior et sollicitior efficitur excitatus tantis laboribus et rumpit quosque nodos malitiae et transit ad meliora. quid dicam, dignatur intellegere sanctitas tua. ergo cum in hac uita sumus et talibus egestatibus impedimur et tamen, sicut scriptum est, superuincimus per eum, qui dilexit nos, exeuntes de corpore et onus omne et agile peccatum euadentes qui sumus?

### English translation (Claude)

I have told what happened. Now deign to hear my question and teach me what I seek; for this soul's departure compels me to ask such things. When we are in the body, we have an inner sense, skillful in proportion to the liveliness of our zeal, and the more watchful and fervent the more zealous we have been; and it seems probable that we are still held back by the hindrance of the body. Who could recount all that the mind suffers from the body? Amid these disturbances and troubles coming from suggestions, temptations, necessities, and various calamities, the mind does not abandon its strength; it resists, it conquers; sometimes it is conquered. Yet, since it remembers itself, roused by such great labors it becomes more agile and watchful, bursts every knot of malice, and passes on to better things. What I mean your Holiness deigns to understand. Since, then, while we are in this life we are hindered by such wants, and yet, as it is written, "we more than conquer through him who loved us," what are we when we go out of the body and escape every burden and agile sin?

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:37: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:1: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 8:37. "Agile sin" (agile peccatum) is obscure in the Latin; perhaps "the sin that clings so readily" (cf. Heb 12:1); uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.4 (CSEL 44:490–491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-4).

## Letter 158.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-5
- Source: CSEL 44:491–492
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks whether the soul after death keeps some body of air or ether, since without bodies souls could not be in distinct places like the rich man and Lazarus.

### Latin text

Et primum quaero, utrum aliquod corpus sit, quod rem incorpoream, hoc est ipsius animae substantiam non deserat. cum dimiserit hoc terrenum corpus, ne forte de quattuor unum sit aut aerium aut aetherium. cum enim incorporea sit anima, si omni corpore caret, iam una est omnium. et ubi erit ille diues purpuratus et Lazarus uulneratus? quo modo etiam meritis discernentur, ut ille poenam, ille gaudium habeat, si una ex omnibus incorporeis apparuerit anima, si tamen figurate illa significata non sunt? certum est autem, quia, si locis tenentur, corporibus tenentur. ut ille diues in flamma et ille in sinu Abrahae. si loca sunt, corpora sunt et in corporibus animae sunt incorporeae: aut si poenae uel praemia in conscientiis sunt, quaeuis est ista una anima effecta ex multis animis, affligatur et laetetur in una, ut apparet. substantia ex multis animis collecta; aut si hoc dicitur, quem ad modum una res animus incorporeus et in eo memoria est et uoluntas et intellectus et hae omnes causae incorporeae sunt et habent officiorum congruam portionem nec tamen altera alteram impedit, utcumque puto esse responderi, ut et aliquas poenae et aliquas praemia comitentur in una ex multis

### English translation (Claude)

And first I ask whether there is some body which does not desert the incorporeal thing, that is, the very substance of the soul, when it has left this earthly body; perhaps one of the four elements, either airy or ethereal. For if the soul is incorporeal and lacks all body, then there is one soul of all. And where will that rich man in purple be, and Lazarus full of sores? How, too, will they be distinguished by their merits, so that one has punishment and the other joy, if there appears one soul out of all the incorporeal ones, unless indeed those things were signified figuratively? But it is certain that, if they are held in places, they are held by bodies, as that rich man in the flame and the other in Abraham's bosom. If there are places, there are bodies, and incorporeal souls are in bodies. Or if punishments or rewards are in consciences, whatever this one soul is, made from many souls, let it be afflicted and rejoice in one, as appears: a substance gathered from many souls. Or if it is said that, just as the incorporeal mind is one thing, and in it are memory, will, and understanding, and all these are incorporeal causes and have a fitting share of functions and yet one does not hinder another, then I think it might somehow be answered that punishments accompany some and rewards others in the one substance gathered from many

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:19: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:23: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 16:19–24. The sentence continues in 158.6. The argument is Evodius's and is obscure in places in the Latin; translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.5 (CSEL 44:491–492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-5).

## Letter 158.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-6
- Source: CSEL 44:492–493
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius suggests that souls may keep a subtle body, citing angels, Samuel, Moses at the Transfiguration, and an apocryphal Moses writing, and that the soul may take bodily heat with it.

### Latin text

animis collecta substantia; aut si non ita est, quid impedit, si unusquisque animus, cum corpus hoc solidum caret, aliud habeat corpus, ut ipse animus semper aliquod corpus animet, aut quo transitum facit, si ulla regio est, ad quam eum necessitas ire compellit, quando quidem et ipsi angeli nec multi dici possunt, si non corporibus numerentur, ut ait ipsa ueritas in euangelio: Possem rogare patrem meum, ut duodecim mihi legiones angelorum misisset, deinde cum constet Samuhelem in corpore fuisse uisum, quando excitatus est ad petitum Saul, et Moyses, cuius corpus sepultum est, secundum euangelium manifestum sit in corpore eum uenisse ad dominum in montem, cum constitissent? quamquam et in apocryphis et in secretis ipsius Moysi, quae scriptura caret auctoritate, tunc, cum ascenderet in montem, ut moreretur, ui corporis efficitur, ut aliud esset, quod terrae mandaretur, aliud, quod angelo comitanti sociaretur. sed non satis urguet me apocryphorum proferre sententiam illis superioribus rebus definitis. uidendum ergo et siue auctoritate siue ratione indagandum, quod quaeritur. sed dicitur, quod resurrectio futura ostendat eam omni corpore caruisse. nec satis impedit, quando quidem illi angeli, qui inuisibiles etiam corporibus sunt, apparere uoluerunt et uideri et, quaecumque illa positio corporum sit, eorum spiritibus digna, tamen humana apparuerunt ad Abraham et ad Tobiam. ita fieri potest, ut resurrectio quidem carnis istius, quae bene creditur, futura sit, tamen sic anima illa reddatur, ut corpore aliquo numquam caruisse reperiatur. cum enim ex quattuor elementis corpus ipsum constet, unum uidetur amittere, calidum scilicet, cum e corpore isto emigrare uideatur. nam remanet, quod terrenum est, et liquor non deest; nec frigidae materiae elementum abest; solum illud eximitur calidum, quod forte secum ipse animus trahit, si de loco ad locum migrat. hoc interim de corpore dixerim.

### English translation (Claude)

souls. Or if it is not so, what prevents each mind, when it lacks this solid body, from having another body, so that the mind always animates some body, or one into which it makes its passage, if there is any region to which necessity compels it to go? For even the angels cannot be called many unless they are numbered by bodies, as the Truth himself says in the gospel: "I could ask my Father to send me twelve legions of angels." Further, since it is agreed that Samuel was seen in a body when he was raised at Saul's request, and since it is evident from the gospel that Moses, whose body was buried, came in a body to the Lord on the mountain when they stood together? Although in the apocrypha too, in the Secrets of Moses himself, a writing which lacks authority, it is said that when he went up the mountain to die, it came about by the power of the body that what was committed to the earth was one thing and what was joined to the accompanying angel another. But I do not feel much pressed to bring forward the opinion of the apocrypha, once those earlier points are settled. We must look, then, and investigate either by authority or by reason what is being asked. But it is said that the future resurrection shows that the soul has been without any body. That is not much of an obstacle, since those angels, who are invisible even in their bodies, wished to appear and be seen, and, whatever that disposition of bodies is that is worthy of their spirits, they nevertheless appeared in human form to Abraham and to Tobias. So it may be that the resurrection of this flesh, which is rightly believed, will indeed take place, yet that the soul will be restored in such a way that it is found never to have been without some body. For since this body consists of four elements, it seems to lose one, namely heat, when the soul seems to depart from this body. For what is earthy remains, moisture is not lacking, nor is the element of cold matter absent; only that heat is taken away, which perhaps the mind itself draws with it, if it moves from place to place. This much I would say for now about the body.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:53: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Sam 28:14: allusion, high confidence
- Deut 34:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 17:3: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 18:2: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 5:4 (Tobit): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 26:53; 1 Sam 28:11–14; Deut 34:6; Matt 17:3; Gen 18:2. Tobit 5 (Raphael appearing to Tobias) is outside the 66 books. The apocryphal "Secrets of Moses" (perhaps the Assumption of Moses) has no entry in the site's list; uncertain identification.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.6 (CSEL 44:492–493; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-6).

## Letter 158.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-7
- Source: CSEL 44:493–494
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius hopes the freed soul is more alert and recognizes friends, but fears it may be in a kind of dreamless sleep.

### Latin text

Videtur quoque mihi, quod, si in corpore positus, ut iam dixi, uegetat, strenua utitur mentis intentione, quanto magis expeditus, agilis, uegetus, strenuus, feruens, intentus erit, et capacior efficitur ac melior, ut in corpore positus gustauerit uirtutem. quo deposito magis quasi abstersa nube totus serenus effectus et in tranquillitate sine temptatione positus uideat, quod desiderauit, amplexetur, quod amauit, recordetur quoque et amicorum et quos iam praemiserat agnoscat et quos post se dimisit. forte sic est; ego nescio, discere quaero. satis autem me perturbat, si soporem quendam accipit animus ipse, ut talis sit, qualis cum dormit in corpore constitutus quasi sepultus et in spe tantum uiuens, ceterum nihil agens, nihil sciens, maxime si somnio nullo pulsetur. quae res uehementer terret et quasi extinctum indicat animum.

### English translation (Claude)

It also seems to me that if, placed in the body, as I have said, the mind is vigorous and uses a strenuous intention of mind, how much more, when set free, will it be agile, vigorous, strenuous, fervent, intent, and will become more capable and better, as it tasted virtue while placed in the body. Having laid the body aside, with the cloud as it were wiped away, made wholly serene and placed in tranquillity without temptation, it may see what it desired, embrace what it loved, remember also its friends, and recognize both those it had sent before it and those it left behind. Perhaps it is so; I do not know, I seek to learn. But it troubles me greatly if the mind receives a kind of sleep, so that it is like what it is when it sleeps while placed in the body, as it were buried and living only in hope, but otherwise doing nothing, knowing nothing, especially if it is stirred by no dream. This thing terrifies me greatly and shows the mind as it were extinguished.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.7 (CSEL 44:493–494; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-7).

## Letter 158.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-8
- Source: CSEL 44:494
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks whether departed souls have senses, citing demons, reported apparitions of the dead, and nocturnal prayers heard in basilicas.

### Latin text

Illud etiam quaero, si corpus habere fuerit indagatus, utrum et aliquo sensu non careat. certe, si non odorandi necessitas ei, ut puto, ingeri potest neque gustandi sed nec tangendi, dubito remanere uidendi et audiendi. nam quid est, quod audire dicuntur daemones non in hominibus, quos uexant — nam et in his quaestio est — sed etiam cum apparent in corporibus suis? de uisu autem, quo modo transeunt de loco in locum, si corpus habent, si sensu uisibili duce carent? putas, non ita sunt animae humanae, cum de corporibus egrediuntur, ut et corpus aliquod habeant et sensu aliquo non careant? quid est et illud, quod plerique mortui uisi sunt in domibus ita ingredi, ut soliti sunt, aut per diem aut per noctem a uigilantibus, ab ambulantibus — non hoc semel audiui -, et illud, quod dicitur plerumque in quadam particula noctis in locis, in quibus humata corpora sunt, et maxime in basilicis fieri tumultus, orationes? non enim ab uno hoc audisse me memini; nam testis est uisionis istius uir quidam sanctus presbyter, qui multitudinem talium de baptisterio exeuntium in corporibus lucidis et postea in medio ipsius ecclesiae orationes aduerterit. haec ergo omnia aut illi nostrae inquisitioni fauent aut, si fabulae sunt, mirum tamen uellem aliquid ex hac re nosse, quia ueniunt et uisitant et uidentur exceptis somniis.

### English translation (Claude)

I also ask this: if the soul is found to have a body, whether it also has some sense. Certainly, if, as I think, it can have no need of smelling, nor of tasting, nor even of touching, I doubt whether seeing and hearing remain. For what is it that demons are said to hear, not only in the people they torment (for there too there is a question), but also when they appear in their own bodies? As for sight, how do they pass from place to place, if they have a body, if they lack the guidance of the sense of sight? Do you think human souls are not so, when they go out of bodies, that they both have some body and do not lack some sense? What, too, of the fact that many dead persons have been seen entering houses as they used to, by day or by night, by people awake and walking about (I have heard this more than once), and of what is said, that often at a certain part of the night, in places where bodies are buried, and especially in basilicas, there are noises and prayers? For I remember hearing this not from one person only; for a certain holy presbyter is a witness of such a vision, who saw a multitude of such beings coming out of the baptistery in shining bodies and afterward heard prayers in the middle of the church itself. All these things, then, either favor that inquiry of ours, or, if they are tales, I would nevertheless like to know something about this wonderful matter, since they come and visit and are seen apart from dreams.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.8 (CSEL 44:494; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-8).

## Letter 158.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-9
- Source: CSEL 44:494–495
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius reports having seen departed monks in dreams whose words came true, and asks whether they were the dead themselves or another spirit.

### Latin text

Ex quibus alia nascitur quaestio. non enim modo phantasiam ego curo, quam sibi cor ineruditum fingit, uisitationes loquor. quo modo apparuit Ioseph per somnium, quo modo plerique uisitati sunt, sic ergo et nostri, quos praemisimus, aliquando ueniunt, ipsi apparent per somnium et loquuntur. nam memini me ego uidisse et Profuturum et Priuatum et Seruilium, quos memini sanctos uiros de monasterio praecessisse, locutos mihi et ita fuisse factum, ut dixerunt. aut si aliquis spiritus melior est, qui eorum figuram adsumit et mentem uisitat, uiderit ille, cui omnia nuda a summa ceruice sunt. si quid ergo de his omnibus tuae sanctitati dominus per rationem loqui dignabitur, rogo, ut facere me digneris participem huius scientiae. praeterire autem et hoc nolui; forte enim pertinet ad inquisitionem meam.

### English translation (Claude)

From these arises another question. For I am not now concerned with the fantasy which an untrained heart invents for itself; I speak of visitations. As Joseph was visited in a dream, as many have been visited, so too our own whom we have sent before us sometimes come; they themselves appear in a dream and speak. For I remember that I myself saw Profuturus and Privatus and Servilius, holy men whom I remember to have gone before us from the monastery, speaking to me, and that it happened as they said. Or if it is some better spirit that takes their form and visits the mind, let him see to it to whom all things are naked from the top of the head. If, then, the Lord deigns to tell your Holiness anything about all these things by reason, I ask you to deign to make me a sharer in this knowledge. And I did not want to pass over this either; for perhaps it bears on my inquiry.

### Scripture references

- Matt 1:20: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 4:13: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 1:20; Heb 4:13 (echo). Profuturus, Privatus, and Servilius were members of Augustine's early monastic community.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.9 (CSEL 44:494–495; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-9).

## Letter 158.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-10
- Source: CSEL 44:495–496
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Dreams foretold the young man's death and then his father's, who died seven days after him; Evodius asks Augustine to explain such things.

### Latin text

Puer ipse, de quo agitur, tempore, quo soluebatur, exhibitus quodam modo pergit. nam uidetur per somnium condiscipulus et conlector ipsius, cum quo mihi excipiebat, qui iam ante octo menses corpore erat exemptus, uenisse. cum interrogaretur ab eo, qui eum tunc cernebat, cur aduenisset, ait ille: Ad amicum meum hinc ducendum ueni. et ita factum est. nam et in domo ipsa seni cuidam paene uigilanti apparuit homo laurum portans in manu et scriptum. at ubi ille uisus est, adiungitur adhuc, quod post exitum pueri pater ipsius presbyter cum sene Theasio in monasterio esse coeperat consolandi se gratia, sed post tertium diem pueri defuncti uidetur idem puer ad monasterium ingressus et a quodam fratre per quoddam somnium interrogatur, utrum sciret se fuisse mortuum; dixit se scire; utrum fuisset a deo receptus; et hoc secum magna rettulit gratulatione; cumque causa quaereretur, cur aduenisset, ait tunc ille: Missus sum, ut exhibeam patrem meum euigilat, cui haec ostendebantur, et narrat. peruenit usque ad aurem episcopi Theasi, qui permotus obiurgauit dicentem, ne facile perueniret ad aurem presbyteri et perturbaretur tali nuntio. quid diu? post dies forte quattuor uisitationis, cum loquitur — nam modicam senserat febriculam, periculum nullum erat, medicus aberat, qui penitus sollicitudinem nullam esse testaretur — at ubi se in lectum inclinauit, solutus est idem presbyter. nec taceo, et in hoc ipso die, quo puer soluebatur, petit patrem ad pacem et petit tertio et in singulis osculis dicebat patri: Pares dicamus deo gratias et patrem cogebat, ut pariter secum dixisset, quasi communem exhortans ad migrandum ex hac uita. nam inter utrosque septem dies medii numerantur. quid fiet de tantis rebus? quis erit occultarum istarum causarum fidelissimus magister? aestus cordis mei refudit se tibi in tempore angustiae. dispensatio exitus pueri eiusque patris est manifesta, quia duo passeres non cadent ad terram sine uoluntate patris.

### English translation (Claude)

The young man himself of whom we speak, at the time when he was being released, departed as if summoned in a certain way. For a fellow pupil and fellow reader of his, with whom he took shorthand for me, who had left the body eight months before, was seen in a dream to have come. When he was asked by the one who then saw him why he had come, he said: "I have come to take my friend from here." And so it happened. For in that very house there also appeared to a certain old man, almost awake, a man carrying a laurel branch in his hand, with something written on it. And besides what was seen there, this is further added: after the young man's death, his father the presbyter had begun to stay in the monastery with the old bishop Theasius for the sake of consolation; but on the third day after the boy's death the same boy was seen to enter the monastery, and was asked by a certain brother in a dream whether he knew that he had died; he said that he knew; whether he had been received by God; and this too he reported with great rejoicing. And when the reason was asked why he had come, he then said: "I have been sent to fetch my father." The one to whom these things were shown awakes and tells it. It reached the ears of Bishop Theasius, who, disturbed, rebuked the man who told it, lest it should easily reach the presbyter's ears and he be troubled by such news. In short: about four days after the visitation, while he was speaking (for he had felt a slight fever, there was no danger, the physician was away, and he testified that there was no cause for anxiety at all), when he lay down on his bed, the same presbyter was released. Nor shall I be silent about this: on the very day on which the boy was being released, he asked his father for the kiss of peace, asked three times, and at each kiss said to his father, "Let us give thanks to God together," and compelled his father to say it with him, as if exhorting him to depart from this life in common. For between the two deaths seven days are counted. What shall become of such great things? Who will be the most faithful teacher of these hidden causes? The heat of my heart has poured itself out to you in a time of distress. The ordering of the departure of the young man and of his father is manifest, since "two sparrows will not fall to the ground without the Father's will."

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 10:29. "Pares dicamus" is read as "let us say together"; the digital text may be corrupt (pariter); translated by sense. "With something written on it": the Latin "et scriptum" is terse; uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.10 (CSEL 44:495–496; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-10).

## Letter 158.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-11
- Source: CSEL 44:496–497
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius argues that only God is wholly bodiless, and that the soul freed from the body is more alert, as a dream of the departed Servilius suggested.

### Latin text

Animam ergo omni corpore carere penitus non posse illa res, ut puto, ostendit, quia deus solus omni corpore semper caret. post transitum autem animam quam magis uigilantiorem fore, arbitror, expositio tantae molis corporeae ostendit; tunc enim in actione et cognitione expedita tanto uinculo, ut puto, apparet praestantior et omnis illa quies spiritalis omnibus perturbationibus et erroribus liberam demonstrat, non marcidam at quasi segnem et torpidam et implicatam facit, quippe cui sufficit perfrui etiam ipsa libertate, quam adepta est, cum mundum et corpus caret; nam intellectum eam pasci et ponere os spiritale ad fontem uitae prudenter dixisti, ubi est felix et beata proprietate mentis suae. nam aliquando ego Seruilium fratrem post eius exitum per somnium uidi adhuc ibi positus in monasterio............., quod nos per rationem laboremus tendere ad intellectum, se autem et tales ipsa contemplationis delectatione manere.

### English translation (Claude)

That the soul cannot be wholly without any body is shown, I think, by this: that God alone is always without any body. But that the soul will be much more watchful after its passage is shown, I think, by its laying aside so great a bodily mass; for then, freed from so great a bond in action and knowledge, it appears, I think, more excellent; and all that spiritual rest shows it free from all disturbances and errors, and does not make it withered or as it were sluggish, torpid, and entangled, since it is enough for it to enjoy even the freedom it has obtained, when it is without the world and the body. For you have said wisely that it feeds on understanding and puts its spiritual mouth to the fountain of life, where it is happy and blessed in the proper character of its mind. For once I saw brother Servilius after his death in a dream, while I was still living there in the monastery … that we labor by reasoning to strive toward understanding, whereas he and such as he remain in the very delight of contemplation.

### Translation notes

- A gap in the text is marked by dots in the digital edition; translated as "…". The quotation "puts its spiritual mouth to the fountain of life" refers to something Augustine had written to Evodius (cf. Ep. 162.1; Augustine, Ep. 98).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.11 (CSEL 44:496–497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-11).

## Letter 158.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-12
- Source: CSEL 44:497
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius also asks in how many senses "wisdom" is used in Scripture and how they relate to the eternal Wisdom of God.

### Latin text

Peto quoque, ut, quot modis sapientia dicatur, ostendas mihi, ut sapientia deus, ut sapientia animus sapiens, quo modo dicitur ut lux, ut sapientia Beselehel, qui fabricatus est tabernaculum uel unguentarium, ut sapientia Salomonis uel si qua est alia, et quid inuicem distent; et utrum una illa sapientia aeterna cum patre in his gradibus intellegenda sit, quo modo diuersa munera dicuntur spiritus sancti, qui diuidit unicuique propria prout uult, an excepta illa sola sapientia, quae facta non est, istae factae sunt et propriam habent substantiam, an effecta sunt et ex definitione operis nomen acceperunt. multa requiro; det tibi dominus et gratiam inueniendi et sapientiam dictandi et ad nos celeriter scribendi. inperite et rustice scripsi; sed quia dignaris nosse, quid quaeram, per Christum dominum obsecro, ut in his corrigas me et doceas, quod intellegis me scire cupere.

### English translation (Claude)

I ask also that you show me in how many ways wisdom is spoken of: as wisdom is God; as wisdom is the wise mind; in what way it is spoken of as light; as the wisdom of Bezalel, who made the tabernacle or the ointment; as the wisdom of Solomon; or any other; and how they differ from one another; and whether that one eternal Wisdom, coeternal with the Father, is to be understood in these degrees, as the different gifts of the Holy Spirit are spoken of, who distributes to each his own as he wills; or whether, apart from that one Wisdom which was not made, these others were made and have their own substance, or are effects and have received their name from the definition of the work. I ask many things; may the Lord give you both the grace of finding and the wisdom of dictating and of writing to us quickly. I have written unskillfully and rustically; but since you deign to know what I ask, I beseech you through Christ the Lord to correct me in these things and to teach me what you understand I desire to know.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:24: allusion, medium confidence
- Exod 31:3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 37:29: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Kgs 4:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Cor 1:24; Exod 31:2–5 and 37:29 (Bezalel); 1 Kgs 4:29; 1 Cor 12:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 158.12 (CSEL 44:497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-158-12).

## Letter 159.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-1
- Source: CSEL 44:497–498
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Evodius (Ep. 158), commending the bearer Barbarus, and says briefly that the soul does not leave the body with another body.

### Latin text

Frater iste nomine Barbarus seruus dei est iam diu apud Hipponem constitutus et uerbi dei feruidus ac studiosus auditor. desiderauit ad tuam sanctitatem litteras nostras, in quibus tibi eum in domino commendamus tibique per eum salutem debitam dicimus. litteris autem sanctitatis tuae, quibus ingentes texuisti quaestiones, respondere operosissimum est etiam otiosis et multo maiore, quam nos sumus, praeditis facultate disserendi et acrimonia intellegendi. duarum sane epistularum tuarum, quibus multa et magna conquiris, una nescio quo modo aberrauit et diu quaesita non potuit reperiri; altera uero, quae inuenta est, habet commendationem suauissimam serui dei boni et casti adulescentis, quo modo ex hac uita migrauerit et quibus uisionum fraternarum adtestationibus meritum eius uobis insinuari potuerit. deinde ex hac occasione proponis et uersas de anima obscurissimam quaestionem, utrum cum aliquo corpore egreditur e corpore, quo possit ad corporalia loca ferri uel locis corporalibus contineri. huius igitur rei tractatus, si tamen ad liquidum a talibus, quales nos sumus, examinari potest, curam atque operam negotiosissimam postulat ac per hoc mentem ab his occupationibus otiosissimam. si autem breuiter uis audire, quid mihi uideatur, nullo modo arbitror animam e corpore exire cum corpore.

### English translation (Claude)

This brother, named Barbarus, a servant of God who has long been settled at Hippo and is a fervent and zealous hearer of the word of God, has asked for a letter from us to your Holiness, in which we commend him to you in the Lord and through him send you the greeting we owe. As for your Holiness's letters, in which you have woven enormous questions, to answer them is a most laborious task even for people with leisure and endowed with a far greater power of discussion and sharpness of understanding than we have. Of your two letters, in which you inquire into many great matters, one somehow went astray and, though long sought, could not be found; the other, which was found, contains a most charming commendation of a good and chaste young servant of God, telling how he departed this life and by what testimonies of the brothers' visions his merit could be made known to you. Then, taking this occasion, you propose and turn over a most obscure question about the soul: whether it goes out of the body with some body by which it can be carried to bodily places or be contained in bodily places. The treatment of this matter, then, if indeed it can be examined to clarity by such as we are, demands most laborious care and effort, and therefore a mind wholly free from these occupations. But if you wish to hear briefly what I think, I by no means believe that the soul goes out of the body with a body.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 159.1 (CSEL 44:497–498; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-1).

## Letter 159.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-2
- Source: CSEL 44:498–500
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cannot explain how visions occur, since he cannot even explain ordinary mental images; he refers Evodius to Book 12 of The Literal Meaning of Genesis.

### Latin text

Visiones autem illae futurorumque praedictiones quo modo fiant, ille iam explicare conetur, qui nouit, qua ui efficiantur in unoquoque animo tanta, cum cogitat. uidemus enim planeque cernimus in eo fieri multarum rerum uisibilium et ad ceteros sensus corporis pertinentium innumerabiles imagines, quae nunc non interest quam ordinate uel turbide fiant; sed tantum, quia fiunt, quod manifestum est, qua ui et quo modo fiant, quisquis potuerit explicare — quae omnia certe cotidiana sunt atque continua —, audeat praesumere aliquid ac definire etiam de illis rarissimis uisis. ego autem tanto minus hoc audeo, quanto minus id quoque in nobis, quod uita continua uigilantes dormientesque experimur, quo pacto fiat, explicare sufficio. nam cum ad te dictarem hanc epistulam, te ipsum animo contuebar te utique absente atque nesciente et, quo modo possis his uerbis moueri, secundum notitiam, quae mihi de te inest, imaginabar; atque id quonam modo in animo meo fieret, capere ac inuestigare non poteram certus tamen non fieri corporeis molibus nec corporeis qualitatibus, cum corpori simillimum fieret. hoc interim habeas ut ab occupato et festinante dictatum. in duodecimo autem libro eorum, quos de genesi scripsi, uersatur haec quaestio uehementer et multis exemplis rerum expertarum atque credibiliter auditarum disputatio illa siluescit. quid in ea potuerimus uel effecerimus, cum legeris, iudicabis, si tamen dominus donare dignatur, ut eos mihi libros, quantum possum, congruenter emendatos iam liceat edere et multorum fratrum expectationem non iam longa disputatione suspendere.

### English translation (Claude)

As for how those visions and predictions of the future come about, let him try to explain it who knows by what power such great things are produced in every mind when it thinks. For we see and plainly perceive that innumerable images of many visible things, and of things belonging to the other bodily senses, are formed in it (it does not matter now how orderly or confusedly they are formed); but simply because they are formed, which is evident, whoever can explain by what power and in what way they are formed (and all these are certainly daily and continuous) may dare to presume something and to define something even about those very rare visions. But I dare the less to do so, the less able I am to explain how there comes about even that which we experience in ourselves in continuous life, waking and sleeping. For while I was dictating this letter to you, I was beholding you yourself in my mind, though you were certainly absent and unaware of it, and I was imagining, according to the knowledge I have of you, how you might be affected by these words; and how this came about in my mind I could not grasp or investigate, though I was certain that it did not come about by bodily masses or bodily qualities, though it was formed most like a body. Take this meanwhile as dictated by a busy man in haste. In the twelfth of the books which I have written on Genesis, this question is vigorously handled, and that discussion grows into a forest of many examples of things experienced and credibly heard. What I have been able to do or accomplish in it you will judge when you read it, if the Lord deigns to grant that I may now publish those books, corrected as suitably as I can, and no longer keep the expectation of many brothers in suspense with a long delay.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Gen. litt. 12 (Literal Commentary on Genesis): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- "The twelfth of the books on Genesis": The Literal Meaning of Genesis, Book 12, on visions.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 159.2 (CSEL 44:498–500; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-2).

## Letter 159.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-3
- Source: CSEL 44:500
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells how the physician Gennadius, once doubting life after death, dreamed of a youth leading him to hear the hymns of the saints.

### Latin text

Narrabo autem unum aliquid breuiter, unde cogites. frater noster Gennadius, notissimus fere omnibus nobisque carissimus medicus, qui nunc apud Carthaginem degit et Romae suae artis exercitatione praepolluit, ut hominem religiosum nosti atque erga pauperum curam inpigra misericordia facillimoque animo benignissimum, dubitabat tamen aliquando, ut modo nobis rettulit, cum adhuc esset adulescens et in his elemosynis feruentissimus, utrum esset ulla uita post mortem. huius igitur mentem et opera misericordiae quoniam deus nullo modo desereret, apparuit illi in somnis conspicuus iuuenis et dignus intendi eique dixit: "Sequere me". quem dum sequeretur, uenit ad quandam ciuitatem, ubi audire coepit a dextra parte sonos suauissimae cantilenae ultra solitam notamque suauitatem; tunc ille intento, quidnam esset, ait hymnos esse beatorum atque sanctorum; sinistra autem parte quid se uidisse rettulit, non satis memini. euigilauit et somnium aufugit tantumque de illo quantum de somnio cogitauit.

### English translation (Claude)

I shall tell you one thing briefly, for you to think about. Our brother Gennadius, a physician known to almost everyone and very dear to us, who now lives at Carthage and was eminent at Rome in the practice of his art, a religious man as you know and most kind in his care of the poor with untiring mercy and a most ready spirit, nevertheless once doubted, as he recently told us, when he was still a young man and most fervent in these almsgivings, whether there was any life after death. Since God would by no means abandon his mind and his works of mercy, there appeared to him in his sleep a striking youth worthy of attention, who said to him: "Follow me." As he followed him, he came to a certain city, where he began to hear on the right side the sounds of a most sweet song, beyond the usual and familiar sweetness; then, when he wondered what it was, the youth said it was the hymns of the blessed and the saints. What he said he saw on the left side I do not quite remember. He woke up, the dream vanished, and he thought of it only as much as of a dream.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 159.3 (CSEL 44:500; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-3).

## Letter 159.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-4
- Source: CSEL 44:500–502
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In a second dream the youth showed Gennadius that he was seeing without his bodily eyes, teaching him that life and perception continue after death.

### Latin text

Alia uero nocte ecce idem ipse iuuenis eidem rursus apparuit atque, ab illo utrum cognosceretur, interrogauit; respondit iste, quod eum bene pleneque cognosceret, tum ille quaesiuit, ubi se nosset. nec memoriae defuit, quid iste identidem responderet, totumque uisum illum hymnosque sanctorum, ad quos audiendos eo duce uenerat, qua recentissimos recordabatur facilitate, narrauit. hic ille percontatus est, utrumnam id, quod narrauerat, in somnis uidisset an uigilans; respondit: (In somnis). at ille: Bene, inquit, recolis; uerum est, in somnis illa uidisti; sed etiam nunc in somnis te uidere scies. hoc cum audisset iste, ita esse credidit atque id responsione firmauit. tunc, qui hominem docebat, adiecit et ait: <Ubi est modo corpus tuum?) ille respondit: In cubiculo meo). scisne, inquit ille, in eodem corpusculo nunc esse inligatos et clausos et otiosos oculos tuos nihilque illis oculis te uidere? respondit: Scio. tunc ille: Qui sunt ergo, inquit, <isti oculi, quibus me uides? ad hoc iste non inueniens, quid responderet, obticuit. cui haesitanti ille, quod his interrogationibus docere moliebatur, aperuit et continuo: Sicut, inquit, illi oculi carnis tuae utique in dormiente atque in lectulo iacente nunc uacant nec aliquid operantur et tamen sunt isti, quibus me intueris et ista uteris uisione, ita, cum defunctus fueris, nihil agentibus oculis carnis tuae uita tibi inerit, qua uiuas, sensusque, quo sentias. caue iam deinceps, ne dubites uitam manere post mortem). ita sibi homo fidelis ablatam dicit huius rei dubitationem quo docente nisi prouidentia et misericordia dei?

### English translation (Claude)

But on another night, behold, the same youth appeared to him again and asked whether he recognized him; he answered that he recognized him well and fully. Then the youth asked where he knew him from. Nor did his memory fail him as to what he should answer; he told the whole vision and the hymns of the saints, to hear which he had come under his guidance, with the ease with which one recalls very recent things. Here the youth asked whether he had seen what he had told in sleep or awake; he answered: "In sleep." And the youth said: "You remember well; it is true that you saw those things in sleep; but know that you are seeing even now in sleep." Hearing this, he believed it was so and confirmed it by his answer. Then the one who was teaching him added: "Where is your body now?" He answered: "In my bedroom." "Do you know," he said, "that your eyes are now bound, closed, and idle in that same body, and that you see nothing with those eyes?" He answered: "I know." Then the youth said: "What, then, are these eyes with which you see me?" At this he could not find what to answer and fell silent. While he hesitated, the youth disclosed what he was trying to teach by these questions, and at once said: "Just as those eyes of your flesh are now idle and do nothing while you sleep and lie in bed, and yet there are these eyes with which you behold me and enjoy this vision, so, when you have died, while the eyes of your flesh do nothing, there will be life in you by which you live, and sense by which you perceive. Take care from now on not to doubt that life remains after death." So the faithful man says that his doubt on this matter was taken away; by whose teaching but the providence and mercy of God?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 159.4 (CSEL 44:500–502; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-4).

## Letter 159.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-5
- Source: CSEL 44:502–503
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since no one can explain ordinary dream images, no one should pronounce confidently on rare visions; Augustine wishes he knew how to tell true visions from false.

### Latin text

Ista narratione dixerit aliquis tantae rei nos non soluisse sed auxisse quaestionem. uerum tamen cum his uerbis credere uel non credere liberum cuique sit, se ipsum quisque habet. quo se auocet, profundissimam quaestionem. et uigilat homo et dormit homo cotidie et cogitat homo. dicat, unde fiant ista similia formis, similia qualitatibus, similia motibus corporum nec tamen materie corporali. dicat, si potest; si autem non potest, quid se praecipitat de rarissimis aut inexpertis quasi definitam ferre sententiam, cum continua et cotidiana non soluat? ego autem quamuis, quo modo fiant ista ueluti corporea sine corpore, uerbis prorsus explicare non possim, tamen sicut scio non ea corpore fieri, utinam sic scirem, quo modo discernerentur, quae uidentur aliquando per spiritum et per corpus uideri putantur, quoue modo distinguantur uisa eorum, quos error uel impietas plerumque deludit, quando uisis piorum atque sanctorum similia pleraque narrantur! quorum exempla si commemorare uoluissem, tempus mihi potius quam copia defuisset. memor nostri in domini misericordia uegeteris, domine beatissime et uenerabilis et desiderabilis frater.

### English translation (Claude)

By this story, someone might say, we have not solved the question of so great a matter but increased it. But although everyone is free to believe or not believe these words, each has himself to turn to as a most profound question. Every day a man wakes, a man sleeps, a man thinks. Let him say where these things come from that are like the forms, like the qualities, like the motions of bodies, and yet are not of bodily matter. Let him say, if he can; but if he cannot, why does he rush to pronounce as it were a definite judgment about very rare or unexperienced things, when he cannot solve continuous and daily ones? For my part, although I cannot at all explain in words how these quasi-bodily things come about without a body, yet, just as I know that they do not come about by the body, I wish I knew in the same way how to discern the things that are sometimes seen through the spirit and are thought to be seen through the body, and in what way the visions of those whom error or impiety often deludes are distinguished, since many things are told that are similar to the visions of the godly and holy! If I had wished to mention examples of these, I would have lacked time rather than abundance. Remembering us, may you flourish in the Lord's mercy, most blessed lord, venerable and longed-for brother.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 159.5 (CSEL 44:502–503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-159-5).

## Letter 160.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-1
- Source: CSEL 44:503
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius argues to Augustine that reason is eternal and coeternal with God, since it shows that God must exist.

### Latin text

Perfecta ratio illa est, quae omnium rerum praestat scientiam et maxime aeternarum rerum, quae intellectu comprehendentur. hanc aeternam esse, aeternam esse debuisse, aeternum illud esse, quod nec coepit nec desinit nec mutatur nec uariatur, ipsa docet atque ostendit ratio, quam necesse est esse aeternam, non solum quod aeterna doceat et demonstret, sed multo magis quod ipsa aeternitas non potest esse sine ratione; quae, arbitror, non esset aeternitas, si ratio ipsa aeterna non fuisset. deinde deum esse uel esse debuisse nec aliter fieri debere, quam ut deus esset, ratio ipsa demonstrat. quae utique, siue essent, qui hoc scirent, siue non essent, tamen, cum aeternus sit deus, dubitandum non est aeternam esse rationem, quae deum esse oportuisse intenderet, ita autem ut illi se demonstraret esse coaeternam.

### English translation (Claude)

Perfect reason is that which provides knowledge of all things, and above all of eternal things, which are grasped by the intellect. That it is eternal, that it must have been eternal, that that is eternal which neither began nor ends nor changes nor varies, reason itself teaches and shows; and reason must necessarily be eternal, not only because it teaches and demonstrates eternal things, but much more because eternity itself cannot be without reason; and eternity, I think, would not exist if reason itself had not been eternal. Further, reason itself demonstrates that God exists, or must have existed, and that it could not be otherwise than that God should exist. Whether or not there were any who knew this, nevertheless, since God is eternal, there is no doubt that reason is eternal, which showed that God must exist, and showed itself in such a way to be coeternal with him.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Evodius to Augustine; Augustine replies in Ep. 162. Evodius's reasoning is speculative and at points obscure; translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 160.1 (CSEL 44:503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-1).

## Letter 160.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-2
- Source: CSEL 44:503–504
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks whether reason or God is prior, concluding that reason is either God or God's, and coeternal with him.

### Latin text

Sunt autem quaedam, quae ratione coguntur ut sint, ut anterior sit ratio et effectus posterior eius rei, quam futuram esse ostendit ratio, ut uerbi gratia, cum mundus factus est, ratio habuit, ut fieret mundus. prior est ergo ratio, quam mundus est. ea ergo, quae sciuit ratio futura esse, subsecuta sunt, ut sit princeps ratio, postea mundi operatio. iam nunc, quoniam ratio ostendit deum esse uel necesse esse, ut deus esset, quid cui praeponemus? rationem deo, ut rationem mundo, an deum rationi, sine qua deum nullatenus posse esse probabile est? si enim deum esse aeternum est ratione esse aeternumque esse, ratio ergo aut deus est aut dei est, ut ipsa docet ratio. quae si ipsa est deus, ratio ostendit deum esse rationem et possunt sibi ista coaeua et coaeterna esse. si autem dei est similitudo haec ratio, ostendit rationem dei esse similiter et hoc erit coaeuum et coaeternum. deum autem esse taliter fieri non posse, nisi esset deus, ipsa ratio ostendit. quae ratio si auferatur, — dictu nefas est — non erit deus, si ratio non ostenderit necesse esse deum. tunc ergo deus est, cum eius est ratio, ut sit deus. deus ergo quia est, sine dubio est ratio, quae docuit, quia est.

### English translation (Claude)

There are some things which are compelled by reason to exist, so that reason is prior and the effect posterior of the thing which reason shows will exist; as, for example, when the world was made, reason held that the world should be made. Reason, then, is prior to the world. The things which reason knew would exist followed, so that reason is first, and afterward the working of the world. Now, then, since reason shows that God exists, or that it is necessary that God exist, which shall we put before which? Reason before God, as reason before the world, or God before reason, without which it is probable that God could in no way exist? For if for God to exist eternally is to exist by reason and to exist eternally, then reason either is God or is God's, as reason itself teaches. If it is God himself, reason shows that God is reason, and these can be coeval and coeternal with each other. But if this reason is a likeness of God, it shows likewise that reason is God's, and this will be coeval and coeternal. Reason itself shows that God could not exist in such a way unless he were God. If this reason were taken away (it is wicked to say it), there would be no God, if reason did not show that God is necessary. God exists, then, when there is reason for God to exist. Because God exists, then, there is without doubt reason, which taught that he exists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 160.2 (CSEL 44:503–504; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-2).

## Letter 160.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-3
- Source: CSEL 44:504–505
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius speculates that God and reason are mutually dependent and coeternal, like Father and Son, or like a seed and the fruitful principle within it.

### Latin text

Quid ergo est, si dici potest, in deo primum, ratio an deus? sed deus non erit, nisi ratio fuerit, quae doceat deum esse debere; ratio quoque non erit, nisi deus erit. nihil ergo ibi primum et postremum. natura ergo haec diuina simul quodam modo habet et rationem et deum. unum autem unum generat, aut ratio deum aut deus rationem. subiectum autem aut in subiecto forte dicatur ratio et deus. deus et ratio unus in uno. bene autem deus generat rationem, quia ratio deum esse demonstrat. intellegitur autem deus a ratione ut filius a patre et ratio a deo ut pater a filio. nam et ipsa ratio cum deo deus est. neque enim deus aliquando sine ratione fuit aut ratio sine deo. tunc enim est deus, si est ratio, et tunc filius, si est pater, ut, si ratio auferatur, sicut dictum est, quod dici fas non est, ne ipse quidem deus est; per eius enim rationem est actus et operatio, ut sit deus. rursus eadem dicamus. si ratio non fuit, deus non fuit et, si deus non est ratio non fuit. ratio ergo et deus sempiterna res; deus et ratio simili modo res sempiterna. conexio autem atque unitio rationis ad deum et dei ad rationem, patris ad filium, filii ad patrem principia sibi quodam modo et causas existendi praestant, quia alterum sine altero esse non potest. deficitur in uerbis et, quodcumque dicitur, ne sileatur. utrum autem germen rationis deum dicamus an dei germen rationem, quia nec fructus sine radice esse potest nec radix sine fructu aliquid est? similitudo sit ducta, ut quiddam intellegentiae de deo signetur; uiuit enim et in grano tritici ratio fecundans, quo sterile non sinitur esse; sed iterum si granum tritici non esset, ex qua re ista produceret, ratio non haberet.

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, if it can be said, is first in God, reason or God? But God will not exist unless there is reason to teach that God must exist; reason too will not exist unless God exists. Nothing, then, is first or last there. This divine nature, then, in a certain way has reason and God together. But one begets one: either reason begets God or God reason. Reason and God might perhaps be called subject or in a subject: God and reason, one in one. God rightly begets reason, because reason demonstrates that God exists. God is understood from reason as the Son from the Father, and reason from God as the Father from the Son. For reason itself, with God, is God. For God was never without reason, nor reason without God. For God exists if reason exists, and the Son exists if the Father exists; so that, if reason is taken away, as has been said (what it is not right to say), not even God himself exists; for through his reason there is the act and working by which God exists. Let us say the same things again. If reason did not exist, God did not exist; and if God does not exist, reason did not exist. Reason, then, and God are an everlasting thing; God and reason likewise an everlasting thing. The connection and union of reason with God and of God with reason, of the Father with the Son and the Son with the Father, in a way provide each other with the principles and causes of existing, because the one cannot exist without the other. Words fail, and whatever is said is said so as not to be silent. Shall we call God the offspring of reason, or reason the offspring of God, since neither can the fruit exist without the root nor is the root anything without the fruit? Let a comparison be drawn, so that something of understanding about God may be signified: for in a grain of wheat too there lives a fruitful reason by which it is not allowed to be barren; but again, if there were no grain of wheat, reason would have nothing from which to produce this.

### Translation notes

- Evodius's identification of reason with the Son (cf. Logos) and his language of mutual causation are his own speculation, which Augustine corrects in Ep. 162.2. The digital text "si deus non est ratio non fuit" is read as "if God does not exist, reason did not exist".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 160.3 (CSEL 44:504–505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-3).

## Letter 160.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-4
- Source: CSEL 44:505–507
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius argues that the Father and the Son are each known only through the other, and that the Father was never without his Word (reason), and adds a mention of love.

### Latin text

Cum igitur ratio, quae deus est, aut ostendat deum rationem aut rationem esse deum unum quodam modo alterum ostendens, non ostenditur pater nisi per filium et filius non ostenditur nisi per patrem, ut tunc quasi in silentio sit pater, quando per filium uenitur ad patrem, et tunc quasi in silentio sit filius, quando per patrem uenitur ad filium, ut unum quodam modo abscondatur, alterum demonstretur, ut demonstrans se unus demonstret et alterum nec possit unus sciri, ut lateat alter, quia: Qui me uidit, inquit, uidit et patrem et: Nemo uenit ad patrem nisi per me et: Nemo uenit ad me, nisi quem pater adtraxerit. arduum uehementerque difficile negotium iniuimus, ut aliquid de deo non intellegentes intellegeremus. tamen quem ad modum omnia, quae sunt, sine quadam specie non intelleguntur et incognoscibilia sunt, sic multo magis nihil sine filio, hoc est sine ratione cognitum est. quid enim? an aliquando sine ratione pater alogus fuit? quis audeat dicere? cognoscendum itaque ratione deum unum ex uno uel unum in uno simul in unum esse, quia unus est deus, cui necesse est et illam inesse dilectionem, quia semper habendam ipsa ratio docet uel deus praecipit dilectionem uel exhibendam esse.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, reason, which is God, shows either that God is reason or that reason is God, in a certain way showing the one by the other, the Father is not shown except through the Son, and the Son is not shown except through the Father; so that the Father is as it were in silence when one comes through the Son to the Father, and the Son is as it were in silence when one comes through the Father to the Son; so that in a certain way one is hidden and the other shown, so that the one in showing himself shows the other too, and one cannot be known while the other remains hidden; for "whoever has seen me," he says, "has seen the Father," and "no one comes to the Father except through me," and "no one comes to me unless the Father draws him." We have entered upon an arduous and exceedingly difficult business, to understand something about God while not understanding. Yet, just as all things that exist are not understood and are unknowable without a certain form, so much more is nothing known without the Son, that is, without reason. For what? Was the Father ever without reason, irrational (alogos)? Who would dare say so? We must recognize, then, by reason that God is one from one, or one in one, at once into one, because God is one, in whom there must also be that love, since reason itself teaches that love must always be had, or God commands that love be shown.

### Scripture references

- John 14:9: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:44: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 14:9; John 14:6; John 6:44. "Alogos" ("without reason/Word") is Greek in the Latin text. The closing words on love are compressed and obscure; translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 160.4 (CSEL 44:505–507; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/158-1/#p-160-4).

## Letter 161.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-1
- Source: CSEL 44:507–508
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius questions Augustine's saying that the virgin birth would not be wonderful if a reason could be given nor unique if an example could be found, since no conception can be explained.

### Latin text

Per Iobinum, qui ad possessionem Marcianensem missus fuerat, dudum unam quaestionem de ratione et deo missa epistula mea interrogaui; huius adhuc responsum non merui. sed quia epistulas sanctitatis tuae unam ad inlustrem uirum Italicam et alteram ad Italicam inlustrem in Christo feminam in manibus legentes habuimus, occurrit, quod in epistula de domini Iesu Christi dei nostri carnali in uirgine conceptione et ex ea natiuitate posuisti: Si ratio quaeritur, non erit mirabile; si exemplum poscitur, non erit singulare et uisum est posse de omni natiuitate et hominis uel cuiuslibet animantis uel seminis tale aliquid dici. si ratio enim eius quaeratur, non indagabitur et utique erit mirabile et, si exemplum poscatur, quia nihil tale sit in exemplis, erit singulare. neque enim qui conuentus uiri et feminae uel cuiuslibet conceptionis aliquando quod in secreto formatur, ratione poterit exponi; aut uero seminum ex terra nascentium primitus putrescentium, postea fructificantium ulla ratio inuenietur? non enim et hoc mirabile non est uermem unum sine ullo parente, si ad singularitatem aliquid requiratur, intra pomum uirgineo conceptu formatum perfectum inueniri, unde ad exemplum arbitror dictum: Ego uermis et non homo. de conceptionibus ergo siue coniunctorum siue singularium nescio quaenam possit ratio exhiberi. non ergo de conceptione uirginis tantum non redditur, sed de nulla quidem arbitror conceptione posse persolui rationem.

### English translation (Claude)

Through Jovinus, who had been sent to the Marcian estate, I asked some time ago, in a letter I sent, one question about reason and God; I have not yet been favored with a reply to it. But since we have had in our hands and read letters of your Holiness, one to the illustrious man Italicus and the other to Italica, an illustrious woman in Christ, what you set down in the letter about the fleshly conception of our Lord Jesus Christ, our God, in the virgin and his birth from her occurred to me: "If a reason is sought, it will not be wonderful; if an example is demanded, it will not be unique." And it seemed to me that something of the kind could be said of every birth, of a human being or of any animal or seed. For if its reason is sought, it will not be traced, and so it will certainly be wonderful; and if an example is demanded, since there is nothing like it among examples, it will be unique. For neither can what is formed in secret from the union of man and woman, or from any conception, ever be explained by reason; or will any reason be found for seeds born from the earth, which first rot and afterward bear fruit? For is it not wonderful too that a single worm without any parent, if something is sought for uniqueness, is found formed and complete within an apple by a virgin conception? Hence I think it was said by way of example: "I am a worm and no man." Of conceptions, then, whether of the joined or of the single, I do not know what reason can be given. It is not, then, only of the virgin's conception that no reason is given; but of no conception, I think, can a reason be fully rendered.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:6 (21:7 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Evodius to Augustine. The saying is from Augustine, Ep. 137.8 (to Volusian); Evodius attributes it to letters to Italicus and Italica, which appears to be a confusion; uncertain. Scripture: Ps 22:6 (21:7 Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 161.1 (CSEL 44:507–508; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-1).

## Letter 161.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-2
- Source: CSEL 44:508–509
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius cites animals said to conceive without male seed, and the spider spinning its web, as possible examples that would make the virgin birth not unique.

### Latin text

Sed exemplum poscitur. ecce et de uento dicuntur equae et de cinere gallinae, de aqua anates et alia nonnulla animalia sine uirili semine fetus proprios edere. certe, si integrae non reddunt, tamen possunt inlibatae concipere. quo modo ergo ponitur: Si exemplum poscitur, non erit singulare, quando tot exempla procedunt? nasci etiam in corporibus non solum in femineis uerum etiam in uirorum intrinsecus dico quaedam animalia notum est omnibus. numquid et ibi semen facit conceptionem? ecce exempla, ecce miracula, de quibus ratio nullatenus redditur, aut, si ad hoc redditur, quia in uirgine homine nihil tale umquam contingit, tamen sunt exempla in aliis rerum naturis, quia nata et sine seminibus concipiuntur, ex quibus penitus ratio reddi nequaquam potest. potest tamen et in generatione aliquid tale inueniri, quod sic edat partus, ut integritas naturae non uioletur. soleo enim audire, quod aranea sine ulla uirili conceptione et partus corruptione illa omnia fila, ex quibus tenta texere solet, secundum naturae suae modum proferat mirabiliter et sibi tantum quasi singulari praestitum esse demonstret. ergo si et hoc quaeratur, non tantum mirabile est et exempla talia rerum dari nullatenus possunt? metuo enim, ne ob hoc ipsa praecesserint in exemplis, ut, qui non credidissent uirginem concipere posse, his exemplis conuincerentur esse quidem mirabile, sed tamen non erit singulare; nam omnia dei opera mirabilia, quia in sapientia facta sunt. si ergo hoc nobis obiciatur, quid respondebimus?

### English translation (Claude)

But an example is demanded. Behold, mares are said to bear their young from the wind, hens from ashes, ducks from water, and some other animals without male seed. Certainly, even if they do not give birth intact, they can conceive undefiled. How, then, is it stated, "If an example is demanded, it will not be unique," when so many examples come forward? It is known to everyone, too, that certain animals are born inside bodies, not only of females but also, I say, of males. Does seed cause conception there too? Behold examples, behold miracles, of which no reason is given at all; or, if it is replied to this that in a human virgin nothing of the kind ever happens, yet there are examples in other natures of things, that things born are conceived even without seeds, of which no reason at all can be given. Something of the kind can also be found in generation that brings forth offspring without violating the integrity of nature. For I often hear that the spider, without any male conception and without corruption in giving birth, wonderfully produces, according to the manner of its nature, all those threads from which it is accustomed to weave its webs, and shows that this is granted to it alone, as something unique. If this too is examined, then, is it not equally wonderful, and can no examples of such things be given? For I fear that these may have come first among examples for this very purpose, that those who had not believed that a virgin could conceive might be convinced by these examples that it is indeed wonderful, yet it will not be unique; for all God's works are wonderful, since they were made in wisdom. If this is objected to us, then, what shall we answer?

### Scripture references

- Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulg.): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The beliefs about mares conceiving from the wind and other animals are ancient natural lore (cf. Virgil, Georgics 3.271–275; Pliny), reported by Evodius. Scripture: Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 161.2 (CSEL 44:508–509; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-2).

## Letter 161.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-3
- Source: CSEL 44:509–511
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks how to answer the objection that, if the virgin birth is beyond reason, so might Christ's glorified body be able to see God; he affirms his own faith in both doctrines.

### Latin text

Illud etiam me urget uehementissime, quod sic potest dici de corporis ipsius domini clarificati substantia, quia et ipsa poterit uidere dei substantiam — aisti enim in epistula ad Italicam non posse et certum est —, ut, cum rationem reddere coeperimus, quia non potest, hoc nobis obiciatur, quia, si, quod in illa conceptione et natiuitate factum est, mirabile est et singulare, rationem quaeri nolunt nec exemplum, quia unico hoc praestitum est, ut, quem ad modum de eius conceptione et generatione ratio non redditur, sed in illo solo inuenitur singulare, sic de eius uisione ratio non reddatur nec exemplum requiratur, sed soli illi singulariter licere diuinitatis substantiam corpore uidere. sed respondebitur rationem posse reddi, quia corporea re incorpoream rem nequaquam cernere liceat; metuo, ne respondeatur, quia et conceptio illa ratione exponi et exemplis possit firmari. aut enim in hominibus ratio deficiet et exempla cessabunt et confirmabunt corpore suo unigenitum uidere posse deum aut, si ratio hinc reddita fuerit, consequetur rationem reddi posse ab aliquibus nimis sapientibus uiris et illius conceptionis et consequentis generationis. quid ergo talibus respondeatur, percontor. non enim certamina semino, sed, quem ad modum insidiosis respondeatur, interrogo. ego tamen sic credo uirginis conceptionem et partum, quo modo semper credidi, et corpore quoquo modo clarificato deum uideri non posse utcumque ratione collegi. obuiandum tamen censeo hominibus, qui aut seditiones ex quaestionibus solent excitare aut feruenti studio ad discendum euigilare. ora pro nobis. pax et caritas Christi sanctitatem tuam nostri memorem perficiat, domine sancte uenerabiliterque beatissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

This too presses me most urgently: that the same can be said of the substance of the Lord's glorified body, that it too will be able to see the substance of God (for you said in the letter to Italica that it cannot, and that is certain); so that, when we begin to give the reason why it cannot, it may be objected to us: if what was done in that conception and birth is wonderful and unique, so that they will have neither a reason nor an example sought, since this was granted to him alone, then, just as no reason is given of his conception and generation but it is found unique in him alone, so no reason should be given of his vision, nor an example required, but to him alone it is uniquely permitted to see the substance of the divinity with the body. But it will be answered that a reason can be given, because by a bodily thing an incorporeal thing can by no means be seen; I fear lest it be answered that that conception too can be explained by reason and confirmed by examples. For either reason will fail in human beings and examples will cease, and they will affirm that the Only-begotten can see God with his body; or, if a reason has been given here, it will follow that a reason can be given by some exceedingly wise men also of that conception and the consequent birth. What, then, should be answered to such people, I ask. For I am not sowing disputes, but asking how to answer the insidious. I myself, however, believe in the virgin's conception and childbirth as I always have believed, and I have gathered by reason, in some fashion, that God cannot be seen by a body, however glorified. Yet I think we must be ready to meet people who either usually stir up dissensions from questions or keep awake with fervent zeal for learning. Pray for us. May the peace and love of Christ perfect your Holiness, mindful of us, holy lord and venerably most blessed brother.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's letter to Italica is Ep. 92 (God not seen with bodily eyes).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 161.3 (CSEL 44:509–511; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-161-3).

## Letter 162.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-1
- Source: CSEL 44:511–512
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Evodius that difficult questions cannot be answered hastily, since many readers will see his writings, and he cannot drop his current work for every new question.

### Latin text

Multa quaeris ab homine multum occupato et, quod est grauius, ea putas praecipitari debere dictando, quae tam sunt difficilia, ut cum magna diligentia dictata uel scripta uix perduci possint ad intellectum etiam talium, qualis ipse es. huc accedit, quia non tu et tales tantum modo cogitandi estis lecturi esse, quod scripsimus, sed utique et illi, qui minus acuto minusque exercitato ingenio praediti eo tamen studio feruntur ad cognoscendas litteras nostras siue amico siue inimico animo, ut eis subtrahi omnino non possint. ista cogitanti cernis quanta cura in scribendo esse debeat praesertim de rebus ita magnis, ut in eis et magni laborent. si autem, cum aliquid in manibus habeo, praetermittendum est et differendum, ut ad ea potius respondeatur, quae superuenientia requiruntur, quid fiet, si etiam, ipsis dum respondetur, alia superuenerint? num placet, ut etiam his omissis illa suscipiantur et semper priora fiant, quae posteriora oboriuntur, eaque sola terminare contingat, quibus, cum scribuntur, non superuenerit aliquid, quod quaeratur? quod ut mihi accidat, difficillimum est; sed non opinor tibi hoc placere. non ergo debui alia interrumpere, cum tua superuenissent, sicut nec tua, si alia rursus inruerent. et tamen seruare hanc iustitiam non sinor; nam ecce ut tibi haec ipsa rescriberem, quibus id admonerem, intermisi, quae agebam, et animum meum ad hanc epistulam ab alia magna intentione detorsi.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask many things of a man much occupied, and, what is more serious, you think that things should be dashed off in dictation which are so difficult that, even when dictated or written with great care, they can scarcely be brought within the understanding even of people like yourself. Add to this that not only you and people like you must be considered as going to read what we have written, but also those endowed with a less sharp and less trained mind, who are nevertheless carried with such eagerness, whether friendly or hostile, to get to know our writings that they cannot be kept from them at all. When you think of this, you see how much care there must be in writing, especially about matters so great that even great minds labor over them. But if, when I have something in hand, it must be passed over and postponed in order to answer rather the things that come in and are asked, what will happen if, while these are being answered, still others come in? Do you want these too to be dropped and those taken up, so that whatever arises later always comes first, and I manage to finish only those things during the writing of which nothing new arrives to be asked? That this should happen to me is most difficult; but I do not think you would like that. I ought not, then, to have interrupted other things when your questions arrived, just as I ought not to interrupt yours if others rushed in again. And yet I am not allowed to keep this justice; for see, in order to write back to you these very things by which to remind you of this, I have interrupted what I was doing and turned my mind to this letter from another great undertaking.

### Translation notes

- Reply to Evodius's letters 160, 161, and 163 (ca. 414–415).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.1 (CSEL 44:511–512; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-1).

## Letter 162.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-2
- Source: CSEL 44:512–513
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refers Evodius to his books on the Trinity, Genesis, the greatness of the soul, free will, and true religion, and corrects his notion that God "must" exist by reason: God simply is.

### Latin text

Facile autem fuit hanc excusationem, ut arbitror, non iniquam litteris inditam tibi remittere, respondere autem inquisitionibus tuis non ita facile est et puto in ipsis opusculis, quae me nunc intentissimum detinent, non defutura quaedam loca, ubi haec ipsa expediam, quae requiris, si dominus fauerit. iam etiam ex his quaestionibus, quas modo misisti, multa soluta sunt in eis libris, quos nondum edidi, siue de trinitate siue de genesi. quamquam et illa si relegas, quae tibi iam diu nota sunt uel, nisi fallor, fuerunt, quia ea fortasse oblitus es, quae te conferente mecum ac sermocinante conscripsi, siue de animae quantitate siue de libero arbitrio, inuenies, unde dissoluas etiam sine mea opera dubitationes tuas adhibito scilicet nonnullo labore cogitationis, ut his, quae ibi ad intellectum liquidum certumque perducta sunt, consequentia nectantur; habes etiam in libro de religione, quae si recoleres atque perspiceres, numquam tibi uideretur ratione cogi deum esse uel ratiocinando effici deum esse debere, quando quidem in ratione numerorum, quam certe in usu cotidiano habemus, si dicimus: Septem et tria decem esse debent, minus considerate loquimur; non enim decem esse debent, sed decem sunt. de quibus itaque rebus recte dicatur, quod esse debeant, siue iam sint siue ut sint, satis, quantum aestimo, disputauimus in eis libris, quos commemoraui. homo enim sapiens esse debet, si est, ut maneat, si nondum est, ut fiat; deus autem sapiens non esse debet, sed est.

### English translation (Claude)

It was easy, I think, to send you back this not unreasonable excuse set down in a letter; but to answer your inquiries is not so easy, and I think that in the very works which now hold me most intent there will be some places, if the Lord favors, where I shall settle the very things you ask. Already, too, of the questions you have just sent, many are solved in the books I have not yet published, whether on the Trinity or on Genesis. And if you reread those things which have long been known to you, or, unless I am mistaken, were known (for perhaps you have forgotten what I wrote while you were conferring and conversing with me, whether on the greatness of the soul or on free will), you will find there the means to resolve your doubts even without my help, applying some labor of thought, of course, so that consequences may be joined to the things that were brought there to clear and certain understanding. You have also, in the book on religion, things which, if you recalled and examined them, would never let it seem to you that God is compelled by reason to exist, or that by reasoning it is brought about that God must exist; since even in the reckoning of numbers, which we certainly use daily, if we say, "Seven and three must be ten," we speak inconsiderately; for they do not have to be ten, but are ten. Of what things it may rightly be said that they "must be," whether they already exist (so as to remain) or so that they may come to exist, we have discussed sufficiently, I think, in those books I have mentioned. For a man must be wise: if he is, so as to remain so; if he is not yet, so as to become so; but God does not have to be wise; he is wise.

### Translation notes

- Works referred to: On the Trinity and The Literal Meaning of Genesis (not yet published), On the Greatness of the Soul and On Free Will (dialogues with Evodius), On True Religion.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.2 (CSEL 44:512–513; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-2).

## Letter 162.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-3
- Source: CSEL 44:513–514
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As the soul in dreams sees without bodily eyes and without a body, so at death it departs from the body without taking any body with it.

### Latin text

Illa quoque de uisis, quae tibi nuperrime scripsi et ea commemoras subtiliter dicta, sed maioribus te implicasse quaestionibus, recense etiam atque etiam et cogita diligentius: non pertranseat, sed habitet in eis consideratio tua et inde fortasse utcumque conicies, quo modo sit anima praesens uel absens. in eis quippe uisis demoratur in somnis, cum abest a sensu praesentiaque cernendi, quam praebet oculis uigilans; hanc autem ab oculis, hoc est tamquam a luminaribus corporis animae absentiam, quae fit cum dormimus, si uis maior augeat, ut totum, quod est, inde subtrahatur, mors est sicut ergo a cernendi sensu ad uisa somniorum non cum aliquo corpore abscedit, nisi forte illa, quae uidentur in somnis corporea nosque ipsos inter illa hac atque illac ferri ac referri cum aliquo corpore existimabimus, quod iam tibi arbitror non uideri, ita, si tota penitus subtrahatur atque absit, quod fit in morte, non secum putanda est auferre aliquod corpus ex corpore. nam si auferret, profecto etiam cum dormimus et abscedit ab oculis, in quantum eos relinquit, in tantum secum oculos auferret, quamlibet subtiliores, corporeos, quod non facit. uerum tamen aufert secum quosdam simillimos sed non corporeos, quibus uisa simillima cernit in somnis sed nec ipsa corporea.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what I wrote to you very recently about visions, which you say was subtly expressed but has entangled you in greater questions, go over it again and again and think about it more carefully; let your consideration not pass through it but dwell in it, and from there you may perhaps somehow conjecture how the soul is present or absent. For in those visions in sleep it lingers when it is absent from the sense and from the presence of seeing which, when awake, it provides to the eyes. If a greater force increases this absence of the soul from the eyes, that is, as it were from the lamps of the body, which happens when we sleep, so that the whole of what it is is withdrawn from there, that is death. Just as, then, from the sense of seeing to the visions of dreams it departs with no body (unless perhaps we think that the things seen in dreams are bodily and that we ourselves are carried this way and that among them with some body, which I think no longer seems so to you), so, if it is wholly withdrawn and absent, which happens in death, it is not to be thought that it carries some body with it out of the body. For if it did, then surely, even when we sleep and it withdraws from the eyes, insofar as it leaves them, it would carry away bodily eyes with it, however subtler, which it does not do. Yet it does carry with it certain eyes most like them, but not bodily, by which it sees in dreams visions most like bodies, but themselves not bodily either.

### Translation notes

- Augustine refers to Ep. 159.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.3 (CSEL 44:513–514; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-3).

## Letter 162.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-4
- Source: CSEL 44:514–515
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many people fail to see that mental images of bodies are not bodies, and even those who see it cannot explain how such images exist in the mind.

### Latin text

Porro si aliquis concedat etiam uisa somniorum, quae similia corporibus apparent, non esse nisi corporea, uideatur sibi aliquid dicere. nec ista ingenii tarditas facile conuincitur; multorum quippe est etiam non mediocriter acutorum, quoniam parum adtendunt, quantum ualeant imagines corporum, quae fiunt in spiritu nec omnino sunt corpora. cum uero eas coguntur intueri, si recte aduerterint atque compererint non eas esse corporeas sed corporum simillimas, rationem tamen de his non continuo ualent reddere, quibus causis et quem ad modum fiant, qua denique natura sua subsistant uel in quo subiecto sint, utrum ita in animo fiant ut in membrana ex atramento litterae, ubi utraque substantia est et membrana scilicet et atramentum, an sicut sigillum in cera uel figura quaelibet, cui cera subiectum est, illa in subiecto, an utroque modo fiant ista in spiritu nostro aliquando sic aliquando autem sic.

### English translation (Claude)

Moreover, if someone grants that even the visions of dreams, which appear like bodies, are nothing but bodily, he may seem to himself to be saying something. Nor is this slowness of mind easily refuted; for it belongs to many people, even not moderately acute, because they pay too little attention to how much power there is in the images of bodies which are formed in the spirit and are not bodies at all. But when they are compelled to look at them, if they rightly notice and discover that they are not bodily but most like bodies, they are nevertheless not at once able to give an account of them: by what causes and in what way they come about, and by what nature they subsist or in what subject they are; whether they are formed in the mind as letters are formed in ink on parchment, where there are two substances, namely parchment and ink; or as a seal in wax or any shape whose subject is the wax, the shape being in the subject; or whether these things are formed in our spirit in both ways, sometimes in one way and sometimes in another.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.4 (CSEL 44:514–515; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-4).

## Letter 162.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-5
- Source: CSEL 44:515–516
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The workings of mental images are mysterious, especially in prophecy, where an angel "spoke in" the prophet, and in angelic appearances in dreams.

### Latin text

Mouet enim non solum, ut cogitemus ea, quae absunt a sensibus corporis et in nostra reperiuntur memoria uel quae nos ipsi, ut libitum est, facimus, disponimus, augemus, minuimus, situ, habitu, motu, innumerabilibus qualitatibus formisque uariamus, qualia sunt fortassis etiam illa, quibus deludimur dormientes, quando non diuinitus admonemur, nisi quod haec uolentes agimus, illa praeter arbitrium patimur; non solum haec mouent, quae in animo de ipso animo fieri non absurde forte quis putat quamuis et hoc causis occultioribus, quibus agitur, ut istud potius quam illud in conspectu animi ueniat, sed etiam quod ait propheta: Et dixit mihi angelus, qui loquebatur in me — neque enim forinsecus uoces ad aures corporeas prophetae uenisse credendum est, cum dicit qui loquebatur in me, non ad me —, utrum uoces erant de spiritu factae corporalibus similes, quales agimus, cum apud nos taciti multa memoriter plerumque etiam cantando transcurrimus, sed tamen editae ab angelo, quas miris modis cernebat ab alio, quam ipse fuerat, sibi suggeri, et quod in euangelio scriptum est: Ecce angelus domini apparuit illi in somnis dicens, quo modo enim apparuerit uel corpus angelicum oculis clausis — Abrahae quippe uigilanti sic apparuerunt, ut eos etiam, cum pedes lauit, contrectando sentiret — uel spiritus spiritui dormientis specie aliqua simili corporis, sicut nos ipsi nobis uidemur tali figura etiam per loca moueri somniantes longe aliter quam membra in stratis iacentia.

### English translation (Claude)

For what perplexes us is not only that we think of things that are absent from the bodily senses and are found in our memory, or which we ourselves, as we please, make, arrange, enlarge, diminish, and vary in position, condition, motion, and innumerable qualities and forms, of which kind are perhaps also those by which we are deluded while sleeping, when we are not admonished by God, except that the former we do willingly, the latter we undergo apart from our choice; not only do these things perplex us, which someone might not unreasonably think are produced in the mind from the mind itself (though by more hidden causes by which it comes about that this rather than that comes before the mind's view); but also what the prophet says: "And the angel who spoke in me said to me" (for it is not to be believed that voices came from outside to the bodily ears of the prophet, when he says "who spoke in me," not "to me"): whether these were voices produced in the spirit similar to bodily ones, such as we produce when we silently run through many things from memory, often even singing, yet uttered by the angel, which the prophet in wonderful ways perceived were suggested to him by another than himself; and what is written in the gospel: "Behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying": for how did he appear, whether an angelic body to closed eyes (for to Abraham awake they so appeared that he could even feel them by touch when he washed their feet), or a spirit to the spirit of the sleeper in some form like a body, just as we ourselves seem to ourselves, when dreaming, to move through places in such a figure, quite otherwise than the members lying in our beds?

### Scripture references

- Zech 1:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 18:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Zech 1:9 (Old Latin "in me"); Matt 1:20; Gen 18:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.5 (CSEL 44:515–516; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-5).

## Letter 162.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-6
- Source: CSEL 44:516–517
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that things are wonderful either because their reason is hidden, as with the virgin birth, or because they are unusual, as when Christ marveled at the centurion's faith.

### Latin text

Mouent haec et ideo mira sunt, quia occultiorem habent rationem, quam ut uideri uel reddi ab homine homini possit. nam istae causae sunt admirationis, cum uel ratio cuiusque rei latet uel eadem res usitata non est, quod aut singularis aut rara est. ex illa ergo causa latentis rationis ego dixi in epistula, quam te legisse commemoras, cum eis responderem, qui negant esse credendum, quod Christum uirgo pepererit, uirgo permanserit: Si ratio quaeritur, non erit mirabile; hoc enim dictum est, non quod ratione res careat, sed quod eos lateat, quibus hoc deus uoluit esse mirabile. ex alia uero admirationis causa, quae ideo est, quia insolitum aliquid occurrit, scriptum est de domino, quod miratus sit centurionis fidem; neque enim eum rei ullius ratio potuerit latere, sed admiratio pro laude posita est eius, cuius par in populo Hebraeo non apparuerat. unde ipsa admiratio satis exposita est, cum ait dominus: Amen dico uobis, non inueni tantam fidem in Israhel.

### English translation (Claude)

These things perplex us and are wonderful precisely because they have a reason too hidden to be seen or given by one human being to another. For these are the causes of wonder: either the reason of some thing is hidden, or the thing itself is not usual, because it is either unique or rare. From the first cause, then, the hidden reason, I said in the letter which you mention having read, when I was answering those who deny that it should be believed that a virgin bore Christ and remained a virgin: "If a reason is sought, it will not be wonderful"; for this was said not because the thing lacks a reason, but because the reason is hidden from those for whom God willed it to be wonderful. But from the other cause of wonder, which arises because something unusual occurs, it is written of the Lord that he marveled at the centurion's faith; for no reason of anything could be hidden from him, but the marveling was put as praise of a man whose equal had not appeared among the Hebrew people. Hence the marveling itself is sufficiently explained when the Lord says: "Amen I say to you, I have not found such faith in Israel."

### Scripture references

- Matt 8:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine refers to Ep. 137.8. Scripture: Matt 8:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.6 (CSEL 44:516–517; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-6).

## Letter 162.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-7
- Source: CSEL 44:517–518
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The worm and the spider are not true examples, for Christ alone was born of a virgin; and the two kinds of wonder are like the two senses of "temptation" in Scripture.

### Latin text

Quod autem adieci in eadem epistula: (Si exemplum poscitur, non erit singulare), frustra tibi uisus es uelut exempla inuenisse de uermiculo, qui in pomo nascitur, et aranea, quae filum textrinae suae corpore uelut integro parit. dicuntur enim aliqua argute cuiusdam similitudinis gratia alia remotius alia congruentius, sed solus Christus natus est ex uirgine; unde iam intellegis, quantum aestimo, cur hoc esse dixerim sine exemplo. habent itaque omnia causas suas atque rationes rectas et inculpabiles, quae deus uel usitata uel inusitata operatur. sed hae causae atque rationes cum latent, miramur, quae fiunt, cum autem patent, consequenter ea uel conuenienter fieri dicimus nec mirandum esse, quia facta sunt, quae ratio exigebat ut fierent, aut, si miramur, non inopinata stupendo sed excellentia laudando miramur, quo genere admirationis centurio ille laudatus est. nec ideo est reprehendenda sententia, qua dictum est: Si ratio quaeritur, non erit mirabile, quoniam est aliud genus admirationis, etiam cum ratio manifesta est admiranti; neque enim propterea culpatur sententia, qua dictum est: Deus neminem temptat, quoniam est aliud genus temptationis, propter quod recte itidem dictum est: Temptat uos dominus deus uester.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what I added in the same letter, "If an example is demanded, it will not be unique," you vainly think you have found examples in the little worm that is born in an apple and the spider that brings forth the thread of its weaving from a body as it were intact. For some things are said cleverly for the sake of a certain likeness, some more remotely and some more fittingly; but Christ alone was born of a virgin; from which you now understand, I think, why I said this is without example. All things, then, that God works, whether usual or unusual, have their causes and reasons, right and blameless. But when these causes and reasons are hidden, we wonder at what is done; when they are plain, we say that the things are done consequently or fittingly, and that they are not to be wondered at, because what reason required to be done has been done; or, if we wonder, we wonder not by being astonished at the unexpected but by praising the excellent, the kind of wonder with which that centurion was praised. Nor is the statement, "If a reason is sought, it will not be wonderful," to be blamed on the ground that there is another kind of wonder, even when the reason is plain to the one who wonders; for neither is the statement "God tempts no one" blamed on the ground that there is another kind of temptation, on account of which it was likewise rightly said: "The Lord your God tests you."

### Scripture references

- Jas 1:13: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 13:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Jas 1:13; Deut 13:3. Temptare covers both "tempt" and "test".

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.7 (CSEL 44:517–518; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-7).

## Letter 162.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-8
- Source: CSEL 44:518–519
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: That God cannot be seen with bodily eyes, even Christ's, is not a hidden mystery but plain reason, since God is not a body.

### Latin text

Nec quisquam existimet ideo posse merito dici corporeis oculis a filio patrem uideri ac non potius sicut a patre filium, quia illi, qui hoc putant, cum in reddenda ratione defecerint, possunt et ipsi dicere: Si ratio quaeritur, non erit mirabile; hoc enim dictum est, non quia non est ratio, sed quia latet. illius autem non miraculi sed erroris demonstrare debet nullam esse rationem, quisquis id opinantes refellere adgreditur. sicut enim nulla ratio est, qua dei natura moriatur aut corrumpatur aut peccet, et, cum hoc deum non posse dicimus, non derogamus potestati eius, sed aeternitatem ueritatemque laudamus, ita cum dicimus non posse uideri oculis corporeis, non latet, sed patet ratio bene intellegentibus, qua perspicuum est deum corpus non esse nec aliquid oculis corporeis cerni posse, nisi quod alicuius interualli interpositione cernatur, id autem non nisi corpus esse eamque substantiam, quae minor sit in parte quam in toto, quod de deo credere nefas esse debet etiam his, qui hoc intellegere nondum ualent.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should anyone think that it can therefore rightly be said that the Father is seen by the Son with bodily eyes, and not rather as the Son by the Father, on the ground that those who think so, when they fail to give a reason, can themselves also say: "If a reason is sought, it will not be wonderful"; for that was said not because there is no reason but because it is hidden. But whoever undertakes to refute those who hold this opinion ought to show that for this, not a miracle but an error, there is no reason at all. For just as there is no reason by which the nature of God could die, or be corrupted, or sin, and when we say that God cannot do this we do not detract from his power but praise his eternity and truth, so, when we say that he cannot be seen with bodily eyes, the reason is not hidden but plain to those who understand well; by it it is clear that God is not a body, and that nothing can be seen by bodily eyes except what is seen with some interval between, and that this can only be a body, a substance which is less in a part than in the whole; which it ought to be wicked to believe of God even for those who are not yet able to understand this.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.8 (CSEL 44:518–519; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-8).

## Letter 162.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-9
- Source: CSEL 44:519–520
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever is hidden about bodies, it is plain that bodies occupy space, so God, who is whole everywhere, cannot be seen with bodily eyes; Augustine asks for a copy of Evodius's lost letter.

### Latin text

Latet ratio diuersarum commutationum celeritatis ac tarditatis in motibus corporum et corporalium qualitatum. hinc est omnium uisibilium silua miraculorum. numquid tamen ideo latet esse corpora, habere nos corpus, nullum esse quantulumcumque corpusculum, quod non pro suo modo loci occupet spatium nec in eo, quod occupat, ubique sit totum, sed minus sit in parte quam in toto? haec quoniam non latent, his contexenda sunt consequentia, quod nunc facere nimis longum est, quibus ostendatur non rationem latere, sed rationem omnino nullam esse, qua credi debeat uel possit intellegi deum, qui ubique totus est nec per spatia locorum corporea mole diffunditur, in qua necesse habeat partibus maioribus minoribusque constare, cerni corporeis oculis posse. unde plura dicerem, si hoc in ista epistula suscepissem, in cuius longitudinem non sentiens progressus sum paene oblitus occupationum mearum, ita ut fortasse, quod non arbitrabar, attentioni tuae satis fecerim, qui potes paucis admonitus plura cogitare, quae competunt, sed non etiam eorum, in quorum manus non inaniter uenire ista possunt, si diligentius et copiosius disserantur. laborant autem homines in discendo, quando et breuia non ualent intellegere et prolixa non amant legere; laborant itidem in docendo, qui et pauca tardis et multa pigris frustra ingerunt. mitte et illius epistulae exemplum, quae apud nos aberrans non potuit inueniri. recte in domino ualeas et uigeas memor nostri.

### English translation (Claude)

The reason for the various changes of speed and slowness in the motions of bodies and of bodily qualities is hidden; hence comes the whole forest of visible miracles. Yet is it therefore hidden that bodies exist, that we have a body, that there is no tiny body, however small, which does not occupy a space of place in its measure, and is not whole everywhere in what it occupies, but is less in a part than in the whole? Since these things are not hidden, to them must be joined the consequences (which it would be too long to do now) by which it may be shown that it is not that the reason is hidden, but that there is no reason at all by which it should be believed, or could be understood, that God, who is whole everywhere and is not diffused through spaces of places by bodily mass, in which he would have to consist of greater and lesser parts, can be seen with bodily eyes. On this I would say more if I had undertaken it in this letter, into whose length I have advanced without noticing, almost forgetting my occupations, so that perhaps, contrary to what I thought, I have satisfied your attention, since you can think out many fitting things when reminded with few; but not that of those into whose hands these things may usefully come if they are discussed more carefully and fully. For people labor in learning when they cannot understand brief things and do not love to read long ones; and those labor likewise in teaching who vainly press a few things on the slow and many on the lazy. Send also a copy of that letter which went astray with us and could not be found. May you be well and flourish in the Lord, remembering us.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 162.9 (CSEL 44:519–520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-162-9).

## Letter 163.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-163-1
- Source: CSEL 44:520–521
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Evodius asks Augustine about the origin of Christ's human soul and about the spirits in prison to whom Christ preached according to 1 Peter 3.

### Latin text

Pridem quaestionem misi ad sanctitatem tuam unam de ratione et deo, puto per Iobinum, qui seruit ancillis dei, alteram de corpore saluatoris, de quo aestimatur, quod substantiam dei uideat; tertiam dico nunc: anima rationalis, quam saluator cum corpore adsumpsit, utrum ex una de opinionibus est illis, quae proponuntur, cum de animae origine quaeritur, si qua ibi potest ueritate fulciri, an, quamquam rationalis sit, non erit tamen ex his speciebus, quae de anima humana dicuntur? quartam interrogo: qui sunt illi spiritus, de quibus in epistula sua ponit Petrus testimonium de domino dicens: Mortificatus carne, uiuificatus spiritu, in quo et eis, qui in carcere erant, praedicauit spiritibus et cetera, hoc inserens, quod in inferno fuerunt et descendens Christus omnibus euangelizauit omnesque a tenebris et poenis per gratiam liberauit, ut a tempore resurrectionis domini iudicium expectetur exinanitis inferis? quid ergo in hac re sanctitati tuae uideatur, cupio nosse.

### English translation (Claude)

Some time ago I sent your Holiness one question about reason and God, I think through Jovinus, who serves the handmaids of God; another about the Savior's body, which is thought to see the substance of God. I now put a third: the rational soul which the Savior assumed with the body, does it come under one of those opinions which are proposed when the origin of the soul is inquired into, if any of them can be supported by truth there; or, although it is rational, will it not belong to those kinds which are spoken of concerning the human soul? I ask a fourth: who are those spirits of whom Peter in his letter gives testimony concerning the Lord, saying: "Put to death in the flesh, made alive in the spirit, in which he also preached to those spirits who were in prison," and the rest; implying that they were in hell, and that Christ, descending, preached the gospel to all and freed all from darkness and punishments by grace, so that from the time of the Lord's resurrection judgment is awaited, hell having been emptied? I desire to know what your Holiness thinks about this.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Evodius to Augustine; Augustine answers the question on 1 Pet 3 in Ep. 164. Scripture: 1 Pet 3:18–19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 163.1 (CSEL 44:520–521; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/161-1/#p-163-1).

## Letter 164.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-1
- Source: CSEL 44:521–522
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Evodius that he too is perplexed by 1 Peter 3 on Christ preaching to the spirits in prison, and sets out his difficulties.

### Latin text

Quaestio, quam mihi proposuisti ex epistula apostoli Petri, solet nos, ut te latere non arbitror, uehementissime commouere, quo modo illa uerba accipienda sint tamquam de inferis dicta. replico ergo tibi eandem quaestionem, ut, siue ipse potueris siue aliquem, qui possit, inueneris, auferas de illa atque finias dubitationem meam. quod si prior potuero, cum id donauerit dominus, tibique inpartire ualuero, non fraudabo dilectionem tuam; nunc autem, quae me ibi moueant, intimabo, ut secundum haec de illis uerbis apostolicis uel ipse cogites uel, quem idoneum reppereris, consulas.

### English translation (Claude)

The question which you have put to me from the letter of the apostle Peter usually troubles me very greatly, as I think you are aware: how those words are to be taken as said about the underworld. I therefore send the same question back to you, so that, whether you yourself can, or you find someone who can, you may remove my doubt about it and settle it. But if I am able to do so first, when the Lord grants it, and can share it with you, I shall not defraud your love. For now, however, I shall set out what troubles me there, so that in the light of these points you may either think about those apostolic words yourself or consult whomever you find competent.

### Translation notes

- Reply to Evodius, Ep. 163 (414).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.1 (CSEL 44:521–522; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-1).

## Letter 164.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-2
- Source: CSEL 44:522–523
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks why, if Christ preached in the underworld, Peter mentions only those who disbelieved in Noah's time and not the countless others who died in ignorance of God.

### Latin text

Cum dixisset Christum mortificatum carne, uiuificatum spiritu, continuo subiecit in eo ipso spiritibus, qui in carcere erant conclusi, aduenientem praedicasse, qui spiritus aliquando increduli fuerant in diebus, quibus adhuc expectabat dei patientia, in diebus Noe, cum fabricaretur arca, in qua pauci, id est octo animae saluae factae sunt per aquam. deinde subiunxit et ait: Quod et uos nunc simili forma baptisma saluos fecit. mouet itaque, si apud inferos dominus, quando mortuus est, in carcere conclusis spiritibus praedicauit, quid boni soli meruerint, qui tunc infideles fuerunt, cum fabricaretur arca. etenim post tempora Noe multa milia tot gentium usque ad passionem Christi mortua sunt, quae potuit apud inferos inuenire, non utique eorum, qui in deum crediderant - sicut prophetae et patriarchae de stirpe Abrahae, sicut ipse retro Noe et tota domus eius, quae salua facta est per aquam excepto fortassis uno filio, qui postea reprobatus est, sicut etiam praeter progeniem Iacob alii fuerunt credentes in deum sicut Iob, sicut ciuitas Nineue et si qui alii sunt, qui uel apparent in scripturis uel in genere humano latent, sed eorum dico multa milia hominum, qui deum ignorantes et daemonum uel simulacrorum cultui dediti a temporibus Noe usque ad passionem Christi ex hac uita emigrarunt, quos apud inferos Christus inueniens quo modo illis non praedicauit, sed illis tantum, qui in diebus Noe increduli fuerunt, cum fabricaretur arca? aut si omnibus praedicauit, cur illos solos Petrus commemorauit praetermissa multitudine tam innumerabili ceterorum?

### English translation (Claude)

When he had said that Christ was "put to death in the flesh, made alive in the spirit," he at once added that in this very spirit he came and preached to the spirits who were shut up in prison, spirits who had once been unbelieving in the days when the patience of God was still waiting, in the days of Noah, when the ark was being built, in which a few, that is, eight souls, were saved through water. Then he added: "which also now saves you, in a like form, baptism." It troubles me, then, if the Lord, when he died, preached in the underworld to the spirits shut up in prison, what good those alone deserved who were unbelieving when the ark was being built. For after the times of Noah many thousands of so many nations died up to the passion of Christ, whom he could have found in the underworld; I do not mean those who had believed in God, such as the prophets and patriarchs of the stock of Abraham, or, further back, Noah himself and his whole house, which was saved through water (except perhaps one son, who was afterward rejected), or others besides the progeny of Jacob who believed in God, such as Job, such as the city of Nineveh, and any others who either appear in the Scriptures or lie hidden in the human race; but I mean the many thousands of people who, ignorant of God and given over to the worship of demons or idols, departed this life from the times of Noah to the passion of Christ. How, finding them in the underworld, did Christ not preach to them, but only to those who were unbelieving in the days of Noah when the ark was being built? Or if he preached to all, why did Peter mention only those, passing over so innumerable a multitude of the others?

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:19: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 9:25: allusion, medium confidence
- Jonah 3:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 3:18–21; Gen 9:25 (Ham, or Canaan, cursed); Jonah 3:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.2 (CSEL 44:522–523; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-2).

## Letter 164.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-3
- Source: CSEL 44:523–524
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ certainly descended into the underworld, as Psalm 16 and Acts show, and loosed its pains either so they could not hold him or to free others.

### Latin text

Et dominum quidem carne mortificatum uenisse in infernum satis constat. neque enim contradici potest uel prophetiae, quae dixit: Quoniam non derelinques animam meam in inferno, quod ne aliter quisquam sapere auderet, in actibus apostolorum idem Petrus exponit, uel eiusdem Petri illis uerbis, quibus eum adserit soluisse inferni dolores, in quibus inpossibile erat eum teneri. quis ergo nisi infidelis negauerit fuisse apud inferos Christum? quod si mouet, quem ad modum accipiendum sit inferni ab illo solutos dolores: - neque enim coeperat in eis esse tamquam in uinculis et sic eos soluit, tamquam si catenas soluisset, quibus fuerat alligatus —, facile est intellegere sic eos solutos, quem ad modum solui possunt laquei uenantium, ne teneant, non quia tenuerunt; potest et sic, ut eos dolores eum soluisse credamus, quibus teneri ipse non poterat, sed quibus alii tenebantur, quos ille nouerat liberandos.

### English translation (Claude)

That the Lord, put to death in the flesh, came into the underworld is well established. For one cannot contradict either the prophecy which said, "For you will not leave my soul in hell" (which, lest anyone dare to understand it otherwise, the same Peter expounds in the Acts of the Apostles), or the words of the same Peter in which he asserts that Christ loosed the pains of hell, by which it was impossible for him to be held. Who, then, but an unbeliever would deny that Christ was in the underworld? But if it troubles anyone how the statement that the pains of hell were loosed by him is to be understood (for he had not begun to be in them as in bonds and then loosed them as if he had loosed chains by which he had been bound), it is easy to understand that they were loosed in the way that hunters' snares can be loosed so that they do not hold, not because they did hold. It can also be understood that we believe he loosed those pains by which he himself could not be held, but by which others were held whom he knew were to be freed.

### Scripture references

- Ps 16:10 (15:10 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:27: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:31: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 16:10 (15:10 Vulgate); Acts 2:27, 31; Acts 2:24 (Old Latin "dolores inferni", "pains of hell").

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.3 (CSEL 44:523–524; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-3).

## Letter 164.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-4
- Source: CSEL 44:524–525
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine would gladly believe that admired pagan poets and philosophers were freed from hell, but human feeling is not the measure of God's justice.

### Latin text

Verum quinam isti sint, temerarium est definire. si enim omnes omnino dixerimus tunc esse liberatos, qui illic inuenti sunt, quis non gratuletur, si hoc possimus ostendere, praesertim propter quosdam, qui nobis litterario labore suo familiariter innotuerunt, quorum eloquium ingeniumque miramur, non solum poetas et oratores, qui eosdem ipsos falsos deos gentium multis opusculorum suorum locis contemnendos ridendosque monstrarunt et aliquando etiam unum deum uerumque confessi sunt, quamuis illa superstitiosa cum ceteris colerent, uerum etiam illos, qui haec non cantando uel declamando sed philosophando dixerunt, multos etiam, quorum litteras non habemus, sed in illorum litteris didicimus secundum quendam modum laudabiles uitas, ut excepto dei cultu, in quo errauerunt colentes uana, quae publice colenda fuerant, instituta et creaturae quam creatori potius seruientes, in ceteris moribus parsimoniae, continentiae, castitatis, sobrietatis, mortis pro patriae salute contemptus seruataeque fidei non solum ciuibus uerum et hostibus imitandi merito proponantur? quae quidem omnia, quando non referuntur ad finem rectae ueraeque pietatis sed ad fastum inanem humanae laudis et gloriae, etiam ipsa inanescunt quodam modo steriliaque redduntur. uerum tamen quadam indole animi ita delectant, ut eos, in quibus haec fuerunt, uellemus uel praecipue uel cum ceteris ab inferni cruciatibus liberari, nisi aliter se haberet sensus humanus aliter iustitia creatoris.

### English translation (Claude)

But who these were it is rash to define. For if we say that absolutely all who were found there were then freed, who would not rejoice, if we could show this, especially for the sake of some who have become familiar to us through their literary labor, whose eloquence and genius we admire; not only the poets and orators, who in many places of their works showed that those same false gods of the nations were to be despised and ridiculed, and sometimes even confessed the one true God, though they worshiped those superstitions with the rest; but also those who said these things not in poetry or declamation but in philosophy; and also many whose writings we do not have, but in the writings of the former we have learned of lives praiseworthy in a certain way, so that, except for the worship of God, in which they erred by worshiping vain things that had been established for public worship and serving the creature rather than the Creator, in their other conduct (frugality, self-restraint, chastity, sobriety, contempt of death for the safety of the fatherland, faith kept not only with citizens but also with enemies) they may deservedly be held up for imitation? All these things indeed, when they are referred not to the end of right and true piety but to the empty pride of human praise and glory, themselves in a way become empty and are rendered barren. Yet by a certain natural disposition of the mind they so delight us that we would wish those in whom they were found to be freed from the torments of hell, either especially or with the rest, were it not that human feeling is one thing and the justice of the Creator another.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:25: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 1:25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.4 (CSEL 44:524–525; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-4).

## Letter 164.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-5
- Source: CSEL 44:525–526
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There is no clear authority that Christ emptied hell; the loosing of its pains may refer to Christ himself or to some, not all, of those held there.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, si omnes inde soluit saluator et, sicut requirens scripsisti, exinaniuit inferna, ut deinceps iudicium iam expectaretur extremum, haec sunt, quae in hac re non inmerito mouent, quae mihi interim cogitanti solent occurrere: primum, qua auctoritate firmetur ista sententia. quod enim scriptum est in morte Christi factum solutis doloribus inferni, uel ad ipsum potest intellegi pertinere, quod eos hactenus soluerit, hoc est inritos fecerit, ne ab eis ipse teneretur, praesertim quia sequitur: In quibus inpossibile erat teneri eum, uel, si causa quaeritur, cur uoluerit uenire in infernum, ubi dolores illi essent, quibus teneri omnino non poterat, qui erat, ut scriptum est, in mortuis liber, in quo princeps et praepositus mortis non inuenit aliquid, quod supplicio deberetur, hoc scilicet, quod scriptum est, solutis doloribus inferni non in omnibus sed in quibusdam accipi potest, quos ille dignos ista liberatione iudicabat, ut neque frustra illuc descendisse existimetur nulli eorum profuturus, qui ibi tenebantur inclusi, nec tamen sit consequens, ut, quod diuina quibusdam misericordia iustitiaque concessit, omnibus concessum esse putandum sit.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, if the Savior freed all from there and, as you wrote in your inquiry, emptied hell, so that from then on the final judgment would be awaited, these are the things that not unreasonably trouble me in this matter, which usually occur to me as I think about it meanwhile. First, by what authority this opinion is established. For what is written, that at Christ's death the pains of hell were loosed, can be understood as referring to himself: that he loosed them so far, that is, made them ineffective, that he himself should not be held by them, especially since there follows: "by which it was impossible for him to be held." Or, if the reason is sought why he willed to come into the underworld, where those pains were by which he could not be held at all, since he was, as it is written, "free among the dead," and in him the prince and ruler of death found nothing that deserved punishment, then what is written, that the pains of hell were loosed, can be taken to apply not to all but to some, whom he judged worthy of this liberation; so that he is not thought to have gone down there in vain, without benefiting any of those who were held shut up there, nor does it follow that what divine mercy and justice granted to some must be thought to have been granted to all.

### Scripture references

- Acts 2:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 88:5 (87:6 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- John 14:30: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Acts 2:24; Ps 88:5 (87:6 Vulgate, "free among the dead"); John 14:30 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.5 (CSEL 44:525–526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-5).

## Letter 164.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-6
- Source: CSEL 44:526
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Almost the whole church holds that Christ freed Adam from the underworld, a view supported by Wisdom 10; some add the patriarchs and prophets.

### Latin text

Et de illo quidem primo homine, patre generis humani, quod eum indidem soluerit, ecclesia fere tota consentit, quod eam non inaniter credidisse credendum est, undecumque hoc traditum sit, etiamsi canonicarum scripturarum hinc expressa non proferatur auctoritas. quamquam illud, quod in libro sapientiae scriptum est: Haec illum, qui primus factus est, patrem orbis terrarum, cum solus esset creatus, custodiuit et eduxit illum a delicto suo et dedit ei uirtutem continendi omnia, magis pro hac sententia quam pro ullo alio intellectu facere uideatur. addunt quidam hoc beneficium antiquis etiam sanctis fuisse concessum, Abel, Seth, Noe et domui eius, Abraham, Isaac, Iacob aliisque patriarchis et prophetis, ut, dominus cum in infernum uenisset, illis doloribus soluerentur.

### English translation (Claude)

And concerning that first man, the father of the human race, that Christ freed him from there, almost the whole church agrees; and it must be believed that it did not believe this in vain, from whatever source it was handed down, even if no express authority of the canonical Scriptures is brought forward for it. Although what is written in the book of Wisdom, "She guarded him who was first formed, the father of the world, when he alone had been created, and brought him out of his offense, and gave him strength to rule all things," seems to favor this opinion more than any other interpretation. Some add that this benefit was also granted to the ancient saints, Abel, Seth, Noah and his house, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the other patriarchs and prophets, that they were freed from those pains when the Lord came into the underworld.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 10:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 10:1–2 (outside the 66 books).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.6 (CSEL 44:526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-6).

## Letter 164.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-7
- Source: CSEL 44:526–527
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Abraham's bosom, where Lazarus rested, was not in torment nor part of the underworld, since a great gulf separated them, so it is unclear what Christ's descent did for the righteous there.

### Latin text

Sed quonam modo intellegatur Abraham, in cuius sinum pius etiam pauper ille susceptus est, in illis fuisse doloribus, ego quidem non uideo; explicant fortasse, qui possunt. solos autem duos, id est Abraham et Lazarum in illo memorabilis quietis sinu fuisse, antequam dominus in inferna descenderet, et de istis tantum duobus dictum fuisse illi diuiti: Inter nos et uos chaos magnum firmatum est, ut hi, qui uolunt, hinc transire ad uos non possint neque inde huc transmeare, nescio utrum quisquam sit, cui non uideatur absurdum. porro si plures quam duo ibi erant, quis audeat dicere non ibi fuisse patriarchas et prophetas, quibus in scriptura dei iustitiae pietatisque tam insigne testimonium perhibetur? quid his ergo praestiterit, qui dolores soluit inferni, in quibus illi non fuerunt, nondum intellego, praesertim quia ne ipsos quidem inferos uspiam scripturarum in bono appellatos potui reperire. quod si nusquam in diuinis auctoritatibus legitur, non utique sinus ille Abrahae, id est secretae cuiusdam quietis habitatio aliqua pars inferorum esse credenda est. quamquam in his ipsis tanti magistri uerbis, ubi ait dixisse Abraham: Inter nos et uos chaos magnum firmatum est, satis, ut opinor, appareat non esse quandam partem et quasi membrum inferorum tantae illius felicitatis sinum. chaos enim magnum quid est nisi quidam hiatus multum ea separans, inter quae non solum est, uerum etiam firmatus est? quapropter si in illum Abrahae sinum Christum mortuum uenisse sancta scriptura dixisset non nominato inferno eiusque doloribus, miror, si quisquam ad inferos eum descendisse adserere auderet.

### English translation (Claude)

But how Abraham, into whose bosom that godly poor man too was received, can be understood to have been in those pains, I for my part do not see; perhaps those who can will explain it. That only two, namely Abraham and Lazarus, were in that bosom of memorable rest before the Lord descended into the underworld, and that it was said to that rich man of these two only, "Between us and you a great gulf has been fixed, so that those who wish to pass from here to you cannot, nor cross from there to here," I do not know whether there is anyone to whom this does not seem absurd. Further, if more than two were there, who would dare to say that the patriarchs and prophets were not there, to whom so remarkable a testimony of righteousness and piety is borne in the Scripture of God? What benefit, then, he who loosed the pains of hell conferred on them, who were not in those pains, I do not yet understand, especially since I have not been able to find the underworld itself named anywhere in the Scriptures in a good sense. And if this is nowhere read in the divine authorities, certainly that bosom of Abraham, that is, the dwelling of a certain secret rest, is not to be believed to be some part of the underworld. Although in these very words of so great a Teacher, where he says that Abraham said, "Between us and you a great gulf has been fixed," it is sufficiently apparent, I think, that the bosom of such great happiness is not a part and as it were a member of the underworld. For what is "a great gulf" but a chasm widely separating the things between which it not only is but is fixed? Therefore, if holy Scripture had said that Christ after his death came into that bosom of Abraham, without naming the underworld and its pains, I wonder whether anyone would dare to assert that he descended into the underworld.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:22: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 16:22–26. "Underworld" and "hell" both render inferi/infernus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.7 (CSEL 44:526–527; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-7).

## Letter 164.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-8
- Source: CSEL 44:527–528
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ was in the underworld in his human soul and freed some from its pains, while by his divinity he was always in paradise with the righteous.

### Latin text

Sed quia euidentia testimonia et infernum commemorant et dolores, nulla causa occurrit, cur illo credatur uenisse saluator, nisi ut ab eis doloribus saluos faceret; sed utrum omnes, quos in eis inuenit, an quosdam, quos illo beneficio dignos iudicauit, adhuc requiro. fuisse tamen eum apud inferos et in eorum doloribus constitutis hoc beneficium praestitisse non dubito. unde illis iustis, qui in sinu erant Abrahae, cum ille in inferna descenderet, nondum, quid contulisset, inueni, a quibus eum secundum beatificam praesentiam suae diuinitatis numquam uideo recessisse, sicut etiam eodem ipso die, quo mortuus est, promisit latroni, quod cum illo in paradiso fuisset futurus, quando ad soluendos inferni dolores fuerat descensurus. profecto igitur in paradiso atque in sinu Abrahae etiam ante iam erat beatificante sapientia et apud inferos iudicante potentia; ubi enim non est nullo loco obsessa diuinitas? uerum tamen secundum creaturam, quam ex quodam tempore suscipiendo manens deus homo factus est, hoc est secundum animam eum fuisse apud inferos aperte scriptura declarat et per prophetiam praemissa et per apostolicum intellectum satis exposita, qua dictum est: Non derelinques animam meam in inferno.

### English translation (Claude)

But since clear testimonies mention both the underworld and its pains, no reason occurs why the Savior should be believed to have come there except to save people from those pains; but whether all whom he found in them, or some whom he judged worthy of that benefit, I am still asking. That he was in the underworld, however, and conferred this benefit on those placed in its pains, I do not doubt. Hence I have not yet found what he conferred, when he descended into the underworld, on those righteous who were in Abraham's bosom, from whom I do not see that he ever departed according to the beatifying presence of his divinity; just as on that very day on which he died he promised the robber that he would be with him in paradise, when he was about to descend to loose the pains of hell. Certainly, then, he was already even before in paradise and in Abraham's bosom by his beatifying wisdom, and in the underworld by his judging power; for where is the divinity not, which is confined by no place? Nevertheless, according to the creature which, remaining God, he became man by assuming at a certain time, that is, according to his soul, Scripture plainly declares that he was in the underworld, both foretold by prophecy and sufficiently explained by the apostle's interpretation, in which it was said: "You will not leave my soul in hell."

### Scripture references

- Luke 23:43: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 16:10 (15:10 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 23:43; Ps 16:10 (15:10 Vulgate); Acts 2:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.8 (CSEL 44:527–528; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-8).

## Letter 164.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-9
- Source: CSEL 44:528–530
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine questions the view that the saints raised at Christ's death already received the final resurrection, citing Christ as firstborn from the dead, Peter on David's tomb, and Hebrews 11.

### Latin text

Scio quibusdam uideri morte domini Christi iam talem resurrectionem praestitam iustis, qualis nobis in fine promittitur, quoniam scriptum est illo terrae motu, quo in eius passione petrae scissae et monumenta aperta sunt, multa corpora resurrexisse iustorum et uisa cum illo, quando resurrexit, in sancta ciuitate. qui utique si non iterum repositis corporibus dormierunt, uidendum est, quem ad modum intellegatur Christus primogenitus a mortuis, si eum in illa resurrectione tot praecesserunt. quod si respondetur hoc dictum esse per anticipationem, ut monumenta quidem illo terrae motu aperta intellegantur, cum Christus in cruce penderet, resurrexisse autem iustorum corpora non tunc, sed cum ille prior resurrexisset, quamuis tunc, ut dixi, anticipando fuisset adiunctum, ut et Christus primogenitus a mortuis sine ambiguitate credatur et illis iustis continuo concessum, ut ipso praeeunte in aeternam incorruptionem atque inmortalitatem resurgerent, illud adhuc restat, quod moueat, quo modo a Petro dici potuerit — quod utique uerissime dictum est, quando per illam prophetiam non Dauid sed Christum adseruit fuisse praedictum — carnem eius non uidisse corruptionem, quod adiunxit de Dauid apud eos esse monumentum eius. unde illos utique non conuincebat, si corpus eius ibi iam non erat, quia, si et ante in recenti sua morte resurrexisset nec caro eius uidisset corruptionem, posset nihilo minus illud monumentum manere. durum autem uidetur, ut Dauid non fuerit in illa resurrectione iustorum, si eis iam aeterna donata est, cuius Christus ex semine tam crebro et tanta euidentia tantaque honorificentia commendatur. periclitabitur etiam illud, quod ad Hebraeos de iustis antiquis dicitur, quia pro nobis meliora prouiderunt, ne sine nobis perfecti perficerentur, si iam in illa resurrectionis incorruptione constituti sunt, quae nobis perficiendis in fine promittitur.

### English translation (Claude)

I know that some think that by the death of the Lord Christ there was already granted to the righteous such a resurrection as is promised to us at the end, since it is written that in that earthquake, by which at his passion the rocks were split and the tombs opened, many bodies of the righteous rose and were seen with him, when he rose, in the holy city. If these did not sleep again with their bodies laid down once more, it must be seen how Christ is understood to be the firstborn from the dead, if so many preceded him in that resurrection. But if it is answered that this was said by anticipation, so that the tombs are understood to have been opened by that earthquake while Christ hung on the cross, but the bodies of the righteous to have risen not then but when he had risen first, although, as I said, it was added at that point by anticipation, so that Christ may be believed without ambiguity to be the firstborn from the dead, and it was granted to those righteous immediately, with him going before, to rise to eternal incorruption and immortality; there still remains what troubles me: how Peter could say (and it was most truly said, when he asserted that through that prophecy not David but Christ was foretold) that his flesh did not see corruption, to which he added about David that his tomb was among them. For he would certainly not have refuted them by this if David's body was no longer there; because, even if David had risen earlier, at Christ's recent death, and his flesh had not seen corruption, that tomb could nevertheless have remained. Yet it seems hard that David should not have been in that resurrection of the righteous, if eternal resurrection has already been given to them, David, from whose seed Christ is so often commended, with such clearness and such honor. That too will be endangered which is said in Hebrews of the righteous of old, that God provided better things for us, so that they should not be made perfect without us, if they have already been established in that incorruption of the resurrection which is promised to us at the end, to be made perfect.

### Scripture references

- Matt 27:51: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:52: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:53: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:18: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:29: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:31: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 11:40: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 27:51–53; Col 1:18; Acts 2:29–31; Heb 11:40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.9 (CSEL 44:528–530; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-9).

## Letter 164.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-10
- Source: CSEL 44:530–531
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Peter's letter goes on to speak of baptism, Christ's exaltation, and the gospel being preached "to the dead," which deepens the difficulty.

### Latin text

Cur ergo Petrus eos tantum commemorare uoluerit, quibus in carcere inclusis euangelium praedicatum est, qui in diebus Noe, cum fabricaretur arca, increduli fuerunt, uides, quam latebrosum sit et quae me moueant, ne adfirmare hinc aliquid audeam. huc accedit, quia, cum dixisset apostolus: Quod et uos nunc simili forma baptisma saluos facit, non carnis depositio sordium sed conscientiae bonae interrogatio in deum per resurrectionem Iesu Christi, qui est in dextera dei deglutiens mortem, ut uitae aeternae heredes efficeremur, profectus in caelos subiectis sibi angelis et Potestatibus et Virtutibus, continuo subiecit: Christo igitur in carne passo et uos eadem scientia armamini, quia, qui passus est in carne, desiit a peccatis in hoc, ut iam non hominum desideriis sed uoluntate dei quod reliquum est in carne uiuat tempus; deinde addidit: Sufficit enim praeteritum tempus ad uoluntatem hominum consummatum, ambulantes in libidinibus et concupiscentiis et ebrietate, comessationibus, potationibus et inlicitis idolorum seruitutibus, in quo stupescunt non concurrere uos in eandem luxuriae confusionem blasphemantes. qui reddent rationem ei, qui paratus est iudicare uiuos et mortuos; his dictis subnectit: Propter hoc enim et mortuis euangelizatum est, ut iudicentur quidem secundum homines in carne, uiuant autem secundum deum spiritu.

### English translation (Claude)

Why, then, Peter wished to mention only those to whom, shut up in prison, the gospel was preached, who were unbelieving in the days of Noah when the ark was being built, you see how obscure it is and what troubles me, so that I do not dare to affirm anything from it. Add to this that, when the apostle had said, "which also now saves you, in a like form, baptism: not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the appeal of a good conscience to God, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who is at the right hand of God, swallowing up death that we might be made heirs of eternal life, having gone into heaven, angels and Powers and Virtues having been made subject to him," he at once added: "Since therefore Christ suffered in the flesh, arm yourselves also with the same knowledge, that he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sins, so as to live the rest of his time in the flesh no longer by human desires but by the will of God"; then he added: "For the time past suffices for having done the will of men, walking in lusts and desires and drunkenness, revels, carousing, and unlawful idolatries; in which they are astonished that you do not run together into the same confusion of excess, blaspheming. They will give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead"; after these words he joins: "For this is why the gospel was preached also to the dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit."

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:22: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 3:21–22 (with the Old Latin addition "swallowing up death that we might be made heirs of eternal life"); 1 Pet 4:1–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.10 (CSEL 44:530–531; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-10).

## Letter 164.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-11
- Source: CSEL 44:531–532
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cannot see how the dead in the underworld could be "judged in the flesh," nor why Peter singles out Noah's generation.

### Latin text

Quem non moueat ista profunditas? mortuis dicit euangelizatum. quos profecto si intellexerimus, qui de corpore exierunt, illi opinor erunt, de quibus supra dixit: Qui increduli fuerunt in diebus Noe, aut certe omnes, quos apud inferos Christus inuenit. quid sibi ergo uult ut iudicentur quidem secundum homines in carne, uiuant autem secundum deum spiritu? quo modo iudicantur in carne, quam non habent, si apud inferos sunt, uel quam nondum receperunt, si etiam a doloribus inferni soluti sunt? neque enim, si, ut quaerendo dicis, exinaniti sunt inferi, omnes etiam, qui tunc ibi fuerunt, in carne resurrexisse credendi sunt aut, qui resurgentes apparuerunt cum domino, ad hoc carnem receperunt, ut in ea iudicarentur secundum hominem, quod nec de illis uideo quo modo accipi possit, qui increduli fuerunt in diebus Noe, non enim eos in carne uixisse scriptum est aut credi potest ideo solutos inferni dolores, ut, qui inde liberarentur, carnem ad luendam poenam reciperent. quid est ergo ut iudicentur secundum homines in carne, uiuant autem secundum deum spiritu? an forte praestitum est eis, quos apud inferos Christus inuenit, ut per euangelium uiuificarentur spiritu, quamuis futura resurrectione in carne iudicandi sint, ut per aliquam carnis poenam transeant in regnum dei? quod si ita est, cur hoc tantum de illis, qui quondam non crediderunt in diebus Noe, ac non etiam de ceteris, quos illic Christi uisitatio comperit per euangelii praedicationem spiritu reuixerunt postea transitoria poena in carne iudicandi? quod si de omnibus acceperimus, manet quaestio, quare Petrus eos tantum commemorauit, qui tunc increduli fuerunt, cum fabricaretur arca.

### English translation (Claude)

Who would not be troubled by this depth? He says the gospel was preached to the dead. If we understand by these those who have gone out of the body, they will be, I think, those of whom he spoke above, "who were unbelieving in the days of Noah," or certainly all whom Christ found in the underworld. What, then, does "that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit" mean? How are they judged in the flesh, which they do not have if they are in the underworld, or which they have not yet received again if they have even been freed from the pains of hell? For neither, if, as you say in your inquiry, hell was emptied, must all who were then there be believed to have risen in the flesh; nor did those who appeared risen with the Lord receive flesh for this purpose, to be judged in it according to men. Nor do I see how this can be taken even of those who were unbelieving in the days of Noah; for it is not written that they lived in the flesh, nor can it be believed that the pains of hell were loosed so that those freed from there should receive flesh to pay a penalty. What, then, is "that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit"? Or perhaps it was granted to those whom Christ found in the underworld to be made alive in the spirit through the gospel, although they are to be judged in the flesh at the future resurrection, so that they may pass through some penalty of the flesh into the kingdom of God? If so, why is this said only of those who once did not believe in the days of Noah, and not also of the others whom Christ's visitation found there, who revived in the spirit through the preaching of the gospel, to be judged afterward in the flesh with a passing penalty? And if we take it of all, the question remains why Peter mentioned only those who were unbelieving when the ark was being built.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 4:6; 1 Pet 3:20. The digital text of the next-to-last sentence is defective (a stray letter and a missing relative); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.11 (CSEL 44:531–532; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-11).

## Letter 164.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-12
- Source: CSEL 44:532–533
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The view that Christ emptied hell of those who had not heard the gospel fails, since many have died since his resurrection without hearing it.

### Latin text

Mouet etiam illud, quod hi, qui de hac re conantur reddere rationem, ideo dicunt Christo ad inferos descendente his, qui ibi inuenti sunt, illa loca poenalia tamquam carceres exinanitos, quia non audierant euangelium, quod illis uiuentibus toto orbe praedicabatur, et iustas habebant causas, cur non credidissent, quod eis non fuerat adnuntiatum; deinceps autem non habituros excusationem, qui praedicationem euangelii per omnes gentes celebratam diffusamque contemnunt; et ideo illis tunc euacuatis carceribus iam iustum restare iudicium, quo contumaces et infideles etiam aeterno igne puniantur. nec adtendunt, qui hoc sentiunt, hanc excusationem habere posse omnes, qui etiam post resurrectionem Christi, antequam ad eos euangelium perueniret, ex hac uita emigrarunt. neque enim, posteaquam dominus remeauit ab inferis, nemo permissus est ire ad inferos nisi audito euangelio, cum tam multi morerentur toto orbe terrarum, antequam ad eos haec adnuntiatio perueniret. qui omnes habebunt excusationem, quae ablata dicitur eis, quibus dominus, cum uenisset, quia ante

### English translation (Claude)

This too troubles me: that those who try to give an account of this matter say that when Christ descended into the underworld, those penal places, like prisons, were emptied of those who were found there, because they had not heard the gospel, which was not being preached throughout the world while they lived, and they had just reasons why they had not believed what had not been announced to them; but that from then on those who despise the preaching of the gospel, celebrated and spread through all nations, will have no excuse; and therefore, those prisons having been emptied then, there now remains a just judgment, by which the stubborn and unbelieving will be punished even with eternal fire. Those who hold this do not notice that all who departed this life even after the resurrection of Christ, before the gospel reached them, can have this excuse. For it is not the case that, after the Lord returned from the underworld, no one has been allowed to go to the underworld without having heard the gospel, since so many have died throughout the whole world before this announcement reached them. All these will have the excuse which is said to have been taken away from those to whom the Lord, when he had come, is said to have preached in hell because they had not heard before;

### Translation notes

- The sentence continues in 164.13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.12 (CSEL 44:532–533; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-12).

## Letter 164.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-13
- Source: CSEL 44:533–534
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If people could believe in the underworld after death, preaching the gospel in this life would be pointless or even harmful, which is absurd.

### Latin text

non audierant, in inferno dicitur praedicasse, nisi forte dicatur etiam istos, qui post domini resurrectionem nondum sibi adnuntiato euangelio mortui sunt siue moriuntur, illic apud inferos audire potuisse uel posse, ut illic credant, quod de Christi ueritate credendum est, et habeant etiam ipsi remissionem ac salutem, quam illi meruerunt, quibus ibi Christus adnuntiauit. neque enim, quia rursus ascendit Christus ab inferis, ideo ibi fama eius extincta est; nam et hinc ascendit in caelum et tamen eius adnuntiatione, qui in eum crediderint, salui erunt. ideo quippe exaltatus est et donatum est ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine eius omne genu flectatur non solum caelestium et terrestrium uerum etiam infernorum. sed hanc opinionem si admittimus, qua putari potest homines, qui, cum uiuerent, minime crediderunt, posse in Christum apud inferos credere, quis ferat, quae consequuntur absurda fideique contraria? primum, ne frustra dolere uideamur eos, qui sine ista gratia de corpore exierunt, frustraque curam gerere atque instanter hortari, ut eam homines, priusquam moriantur, percipiant, ne sempiterna morte puniantur. aut, si illi tantum apud inferos inutiliter atque infructuose credunt, qui euangelio sibi adnuntiato hic credere noluerunt, illis autem proderit credere, qui non hic contempserunt, quod audire minime potuerunt, aliud sequitur absurdius, ut hic non sit euangelium praedicandum, quoniam omnes utique morituri sunt et sine ullo reatu contempti euangelii uenire ad inferos debent, ut eis prodesse possit, cum ibi crediderint, quod sentire impiae uanitatis est.

### English translation (Claude)

unless perhaps it is said that these too, who died or are dying after the Lord's resurrection without the gospel having yet been announced to them, could or can hear it there in the underworld, so that there they may believe what is to be believed about the truth of Christ, and may also themselves have the forgiveness and salvation which those deserved to whom Christ announced it there. For his fame was not extinguished there because Christ ascended again from the underworld; for he also ascended from here into heaven, and yet by the announcement of him those who believe in him will be saved. For this is why he was exalted and given the name which is above every name, that at his name every knee should bow, not only of those in heaven and on earth but also of those in the underworld. But if we admit this opinion, by which it may be thought that people who did not believe while they lived can believe in Christ in the underworld, who could bear the absurd consequences, contrary to the faith, that follow? First, that we would seem to grieve in vain for those who have gone out of the body without this grace, and in vain to take care and urgently exhort people to receive it before they die, lest they be punished with everlasting death. Or, if only those believe uselessly and fruitlessly in the underworld who were unwilling to believe here when the gospel was announced to them, while it will benefit those to believe who did not despise here what they were unable to hear, then a more absurd consequence follows: that the gospel should not be preached here, since all are certainly going to die and ought to come to the underworld without any guilt of having despised the gospel, so that it may benefit them when they believe there; and to hold this is impious vanity.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Phil 2:9–10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.13 (CSEL 44:533–534; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-13).

## Letter 164.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-14
- Source: CSEL 44:534
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds to the creed that Christ died, was buried, descended, freed whom he willed, and rose, while leaving the passage in 1 Peter open.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem teneamus firmissime, quod fides habet fundatissima auctoritate firmata: Quia Christus mortuus est secundum scripturas et quia sepultus est et quia resurrexit tertio die secundum scripturas et cetera, quae de illo testatissima ueritate conscripta sunt. in quibus etiam hoc est, quod apud inferos fuit solutisque eorum doloribus, quibus eum erat inpossibile teneri, a quibus etiam recte intellegitur soluisse et liberasse, quos uoluit, corpus, quod in cruce reliquerat, in sepulcro positum recepisse. in illa uero, quam proposuisti, de uerbis Petri apostoli quaestione quoniam, quae me moueant, perspicis et alia fortasse, si diligentius discutiantur, possunt mouere, uel apud nos ea cogitando uel quos dignum est et possumus, consulendo quaeramus.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore let us hold most firmly what faith holds, established by the most firmly founded authority: "that Christ died according to the Scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he rose on the third day according to the Scriptures," and the other things written about him with most well-attested truth. Among these is also this: that he was in the underworld, and, having loosed its pains, by which it was impossible for him to be held (from which he is also rightly understood to have loosed and freed whom he willed), he took back the body which he had left on the cross and which had been placed in the tomb. But in the question you proposed about the words of the apostle Peter, since you see what troubles me, and other things might perhaps trouble us if they were discussed more carefully, let us seek further, either by thinking about these things among ourselves or by consulting those whom it is fitting and possible for us to consult.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:4: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Cor 15:3–4; Acts 2:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.14 (CSEL 44:534; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-14).

## Letter 164.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-15
- Source: CSEL 44:534–535
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that Peter's words refer not to the underworld but to Noah's time as a type of the present, with the ark as the church and the flood as baptism.

### Latin text

Considera tamen, ne forte totum illud, quod de conclusis in carcere spiritibus, qui in diebus Noe non crediderant, Petrus apostolus dicit, omnino ad inferos non pertineat, sed ad illa potius tempora, quorum formam ad haec tempora transtulit. illa quippe res gesta forma fuerat futurorum, ut hi, qui modo non credunt euangelio, dum in omnibus gentibus aedificatur ecclesia, illis intellegantur esse similes, qui tunc non crediderunt, cum fabricaretur arca, illi autem, qui crediderunt et per baptismum salui fiunt, illis comparentur, qui tunc in eadem arca salui facti sunt per aquam. unde ait: Sic et uos simili forma baptisma saluos facit. ad hanc igitur formae similitudinem cetera etiam de incredulis coaptemus et non suspicemur, quod apud inferos ad faciendos fideles atque liberandos euangelium praedicatum sit uel adhuc etiam praedicetur, quasi et ibi sit ecclesia constituta.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider, however, whether perhaps all that the apostle Peter says about the spirits shut up in prison, who did not believe in the days of Noah, does not concern the underworld at all, but rather those times, whose type he has transferred to these times. For that event was a type of things to come, so that those who now do not believe the gospel, while the church is being built among all nations, are understood to be like those who did not believe then, when the ark was being built; while those who have believed and are saved through baptism are compared to those who were then saved through water in that same ark. Hence he says: "So also baptism, in a like form, saves you." Let us therefore fit the rest too, about the unbelievers, to this likeness of type, and let us not suppose that in the underworld the gospel was preached, or is still being preached, to make believers and free them, as if a church had been established there too.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 3:20–21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.15 (CSEL 44:534–535; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-15).

## Letter 164.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-16
- Source: CSEL 44:535–536
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The "spirits in prison" may be souls in the darkness of ignorance in Noah's day, like unbelievers today; the flood signifies both baptism and judgment.

### Latin text

Ad illum ergo sensum, qui te mouet, ideo uidentur adtracti, qui hoc Petrum sensisse crediderunt, quia dixit conclusis in carcere spiritibus praedicatum, quasi animae non possint intellegi spiritus, quae tunc erant in carne atque ignorantiae tenebris uelut carcere claudebantur. de quali carcere se desiderat liberari ille, qui dicit: Educ de carcere animam meam, ut confiteatur nomini tuo, quae alibi umbra mortis appellatur, de qua non utique apud inferos sed hic liberati sunt, de quibus scriptum est: Qui sedebant in umbra mortis, lumen ortum est eis. illis autem in diebus Noe frustra praedicatum est, quia non crediderunt, cum expectaret eos dei patientia per tempus tot annorum, quibus arca eadem fabricata est — nam eius etiam fabricatio quodam modo praedicatio fuit —, sicut modo similes eorum non credunt, qui sub eadem forma ignorantiae tenebris uelut carcere concluduntur frustra intuentes ecclesiam toto mundo construi imminente iudicio tamquam diluuio, quo tunc omnes increduli perierunt; ait quippe dominus: Sicut in diebus Noe ita erit et in diebus filii hominis. manducabant, bibebant, nubebant, uxores ducebant, donec intrauit Noe in arcam; uenit diluuium et perdidit omnes. sed quia ea res gesta etiam rem futuram significabat, ideo ibi diluuium et baptismum significauit fidelibus et infidelibus poenam, sicut in figura non rei gestae sed tantum modo dictae, quod de lapide scriptum est, quo significatus est Christus, duo quaedam praenuntiata sunt, et infidelibus offendiculum et fidelibus aedificium. aliquando autem in eadem figura uel gesta uel dicta etiam duae res unum aliquid significant, sicut fideles significauerunt ligna, quae in arcae fabricam coaptata sunt, eosdemque etiam octo animae, quae in eadem arca liberatae sunt, quo modo in illa euangelica similitudine de ouili idem ipse Christus est et pastor et ianua.

### English translation (Claude)

Those who believed that Peter meant this seem to have been drawn to the sense that troubles you because he said it was preached to spirits shut up in prison, as though the souls which were then in the flesh and shut up in the darkness of ignorance as in a prison could not be understood as spirits. From such a prison he desires to be freed who says: "Bring my soul out of prison, that it may confess your name"; this prison is elsewhere called the shadow of death, from which, not in the underworld but here, those were freed of whom it is written: "Those who sat in the shadow of death, on them a light has dawned." But to those in the days of Noah it was preached in vain, because they did not believe, though the patience of God waited for them through the time of so many years in which that ark was built (for its very building was in a way a preaching), just as now people like them do not believe, who, under the same type, are shut up in the darkness of ignorance as in a prison, vainly watching the church being built throughout the world while judgment is imminent like the flood, in which all the unbelievers perished then; for the Lord says: "As in the days of Noah, so it will be in the days of the Son of Man: they ate, they drank, they married, they took wives, until Noah entered the ark; the flood came and destroyed them all." But because that event also signified a future reality, the flood there signified both baptism for the faithful and punishment for the unfaithful; just as, in a figure not of an event but only of a saying, what is written of the stone by which Christ was signified foretold two things: a stumbling block for the unfaithful and a building for the faithful. Sometimes, however, in the same figure, whether enacted or spoken, two things signify one thing, as the timbers fitted together for the building of the ark signified the faithful, and so too did the eight souls who were freed in that same ark; just as in that gospel comparison of the sheepfold, Christ himself is both the shepherd and the door.

### Scripture references

- Ps 142:7 (141:8 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Isa 9:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 17:26: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 17:27: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:37: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 2:8: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:7: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 142:7 (141:8 Vulgate); Isa 9:2 (Matt 4:16); 1 Pet 3:20; Luke 17:26–27 (Matt 24:37–39); 1 Pet 2:6–8; John 10:7, 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.16 (CSEL 44:535–536; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-16).

## Letter 164.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-17
- Source: CSEL 44:536–537
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Before the incarnation Christ came "in the spirit" through visions, rebuking Cain and Adam and admonishing others, always together with the Father and the Holy Spirit.

### Latin text

Nec moueat ad impediendum istum intellectum, quod eundem Christum dixit apostolus Petrus praedicasse illis in carcere conclusis, qui quondam non crediderant in diebus Noe, ut ideo non arbitremur hoc intellegendum, quia illo tempore nondum uenerat Christus. nondum enim uenerat sed in carne, sicut uenit, quando post haec in terra uisus est et cum hominibus conuersatus est. uerum tamen ab initio generis humani uel ad arguendos malos sicut ad Cain ac prius ad ipsum Adam uxoremque eius uel ad consolandos bonos uel ad utrosque admonendos, ut alii ad salutem suam crederent, alii ad poenam suam non crederent, ipse utique non in carne sed in spiritu ueniebat uisis congruis adloquens, quos uolebat, sicut uolebat. quod autem dixi in spiritu ueniebat, et ipse quidem filius in substantia deitatis, quoniam corpus non est, utique spiritus est. sed quid facit filius sine spiritu sancto uel sine patre, cum inseparabilia sint omnia opera trinitatis?

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it hinder this understanding that the apostle Peter said that the same Christ preached to those shut up in prison who once did not believe in the days of Noah, so that we would think it is not to be understood this way because at that time Christ had not yet come. For he had not yet come in the flesh, as he came when afterward he was seen on earth and lived among men. Yet from the beginning of the human race, whether to rebuke the wicked, as Cain and earlier Adam himself and his wife, or to console the good, or to admonish both, so that some might believe to their salvation and others not believe to their punishment, he himself certainly came, not in the flesh but in the spirit, speaking in fitting visions to whom he willed, as he willed. And as for my saying "he came in the spirit," the Son himself, in the substance of deity, since it is not a body, is certainly spirit. But what does the Son do without the Holy Spirit or without the Father, since all the works of the Trinity are inseparable?

### Scripture references

- Gen 4:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 3:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 4:6–7; Gen 3:9–19; Bar 3:38 ("seen on earth and lived among men", extrabiblical; Baruch has no entry in the site's list).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.17 (CSEL 44:536–537; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-17).

## Letter 164.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-18
- Source: CSEL 44:537–538
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The word order of 1 Peter 3:18–20 shows that Christ, by the same Spirit in which he rose, had earlier come to preach to Noah's generation.

### Latin text

Ipsa quoque scripturae uerba, de quibus agitur, satis hoc, ut puto, indicant eis, qui diligenter adtendunt: Quia Christus, inquit, semel pro peccatis nostris mortuus est iustus pro iniustis, ut nos adducat deo, mortificatus quidem carne, uiuificatus autem spiritu, in quo et his, qui in carcere erant conclusi spiritibus adueniens praedicauit, qui increduli fuerant aliquando in diebus, quibus expectabat dei patientia, in diebus Noe, cum fabricaretur arca. iam, ut arbitror, adtenditur ordo uerborum: Christus mortificatus carne, uiuificatus autem spiritu, in quo spiritu adueniens praedicauit et illis spiritibus, qui increduli fuerant aliquando in diebus Noe, quoniam prius, quam ueniret in carne pro nobis moriturus, quod semel fecit, saepe antea ueniebat in spiritu, ad quos uolebat, uisis eos admonens, sicut uolebat, utique in spiritu, quo spiritu et uiuificatus est, cum in passione esset carne mortificatus. quid est enim, quod uiuificatus est spiritu, nisi quod eadem caro, qua sola fuerat mortificatus, uiuificante spiritu resurrexit?

### English translation (Claude)

The very words of Scripture under discussion indicate this sufficiently, I think, to those who pay careful attention: "Because Christ," it says, "died once for our sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, put to death indeed in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, in which also, coming, he preached to the spirits shut up in prison, who had once been unbelieving in the days when the patience of God waited, in the days of Noah, when the ark was being built." Now, I think, the order of the words is noticed: Christ, put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, in which spirit, coming, he preached also to those spirits who had once been unbelieving in the days of Noah; because, before he came in the flesh to die for us, which he did once, he often came before in the spirit to whom he willed, admonishing them by visions as he willed, certainly in the spirit, by which spirit he was also made alive when in his passion he had been put to death in the flesh. For what does "he was made alive in the spirit" mean, but that the same flesh, in which alone he had been put to death, rose again by the life-giving Spirit?

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 3:18–20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.18 (CSEL 44:537–538; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-18).

## Letter 164.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-19
- Source: CSEL 44:538–539
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ was not put to death in his soul, since he was sinless; whatever the origin of souls, his soul and flesh were free from sin.

### Latin text

Nam quod fuerit anima mortificatus Iesus, hoc est eo spiritu, qui hominis est, quis audeat dicere, cum mors animae non sit nisi peccatum, a quo ille omnino immunis fuit, cum pro nobis carne mortificaretur? si enim omnium hominum animae ex illa una sunt, quae sufflata est primo homini, per quem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, aut non est inde anima Christi, quoniam nullum habuit omnino peccatum uel originale uel proprium. propter quod ei mors debita uideretur — pro nobis eam quippe, quam non debebat, exoluit, in quo princeps mundi mortisque praepositus nihil inuenit; neque enim absurdum est, ut, qui primo homini animam creauit, crearet et sibi — aut, si et ipsa inde est, eam suscipiendo mundauit, ut sine ullo prorsus peccato uel perpetrato uel traducto ad nos ueniens de uirgine nasceretur. si autem animae non ex illa una propagantur et sola ex Adam caro trahit originale peccatum, ita sibi creauit animam dei filius, ut ceteris creat, quam non tamen carni peccati miscuit sed similitudini carnis peccati. sumpsit enim ex uirgine ueram quidem carnis substantiam, non tamen peccati carnem, quia non ex carnali concupiscentia siue seminatam siue conceptam, mortalem sane ac per aetates mutabilem tamquam carni peccati sine peccato simillimam.

### English translation (Claude)

For who would dare to say that Jesus was put to death in the soul, that is, in that spirit which belongs to man, since the death of the soul is nothing but sin, from which he was entirely free when he was put to death in the flesh for us? For if the souls of all human beings come from that one which was breathed into the first man, "through whom sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so it passed into all men," then either Christ's soul is not from there, since he had no sin at all, original or personal, on account of which death would seem to be owed to him (for he paid for us the death which he did not owe, he in whom the prince of the world and ruler of death found nothing; nor is it absurd that he who created a soul for the first man should create one for himself too); or, if it too is from there, he cleansed it in assuming it, so that he might be born of the virgin, coming to us without any sin at all, whether committed or transmitted. But if souls are not propagated from that one, and only the flesh draws original sin from Adam, the Son of God created a soul for himself as he creates souls for others, yet he did not join it to sinful flesh but to the likeness of sinful flesh. For he took from the virgin the true substance of flesh, yet not sinful flesh, because it was neither sown nor conceived from carnal concupiscence; mortal indeed, and changeable through the ages of life, as most like sinful flesh, yet without sin.

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:30: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 2:7; Rom 5:12; John 14:30; Rom 8:3. Augustine leaves open the origin of souls (propagation or individual creation), answering Evodius's question about Christ's soul (Ep. 163).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.19 (CSEL 44:538–539; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-19).

## Letter 164.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-20
- Source: CSEL 44:539
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects only the view that souls are imprisoned in bodies for previous sins; Christ's soul never died, so "made alive in the spirit" refers to his flesh raised by the Spirit.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc, quaecumque de anima opinio uera sit, quarum nullam temere adfirmare adhuc audeo nisi tantum illam repudiare, qua creduntur animae pro meritis nescio quorum superiorum actuum suorum singulae in singula corpora tamquam in carceres trudi, certe anima Christi non solum inmortalis secundum ceterarum naturam sed etiam nullo mortificata peccato uel damnatione punita est, quibus duabus causis mors animae intellegi potest, et ideo non secundum ipsam dici potuit Christus uiuificatus spiritu. in ea re quippe uiuificatus est, in qua fuerat mortificatus. ergo de carne dictum est; ipsa enim reuixit anima redeunte, quia ipsa erat mortua anima recedente. mortificatus ergo carne dictus est, quia secundum solam carnem mortuus est, uiuificatus autem spiritu, quia illo spiritu operante, in quo, ad quos uolebat, ueniebat et praedicabat, etiam ipsa caro uiuificata surrexit, in qua modo ad homines uenit.

### English translation (Claude)

And therefore, whichever opinion about the soul is true (none of which I yet dare to affirm rashly, except only to reject that by which souls are believed to be thrust one by one into individual bodies as into prisons in accordance with the merits of I know not what previous acts of theirs), certainly the soul of Christ was not only immortal according to the nature of other souls but also neither put to death by any sin nor punished by condemnation, the two ways in which death of the soul can be understood; and therefore it could not be said in respect of it that Christ was made alive in the spirit. For he was made alive in that in which he had been put to death. It was said, then, of the flesh; for it revived when the soul returned, because it had died when the soul departed. He is said, then, to have been put to death in the flesh because he died according to the flesh alone, but made alive in the spirit because, by the working of that Spirit in which he used to come to whom he willed and preach, the flesh itself too was made alive and rose, in which he has now come to men.

### Translation notes

- The rejected opinion is that of Origen and others on the pre-existence of souls.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.20 (CSEL 44:539; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-20).

## Letter 164.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-21
- Source: CSEL 44:539–540
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: "The dead" to whom the gospel was preached can be understood as the spiritually dead in this life, who on believing are judged in the flesh by trials but live in the spirit.

### Latin text

Proinde etiam illud, quod postea dictum est de incredulis: Qui reddent rationem ei, qui paratus est iudicare uiuos et mortuos, non est consequens, ut eos hic intellegamus mortuos, qui de corpore exierunt. fieri enim potest, ut mortuos dixerit infideles, hoc est in anima mortuos, de qualibus dicitur: Dimitte mortuos, sepeliant mortuos suos, uiuos autem, qui credunt in eum non frustra audientes: Surge, qui dormis, et exsurge a mortuis et inluminabit te Christus, de qualibus etiam ipse dominus dicit: Veniet hora et nunc est, quando mortui audient uocem filii dei et, qui audierint, uiuent. proinde etiam quod sequitur et dicit Petrus: Propter hoc et mortuis euangelizatum, ut iudicentur quidem secundum homines in carne, uiuant autem secundum deum spiritu, non cogit apud inferos intellegi. propter hoc enim in hac uita et mortuis euangelizatum est, id est infidelibus et iniquis, ut, cum crediderint, iudicentur quidem secundum homines in carne, hoc est in diuersis tribulationibus et ipsa morte carnis. unde idem apostolus alio loco dicit tempus esse, ut iudicium incipiat a domo domini. uiuant autem secundum deum spiritu, quia et in ipso fuerant mortificati, cum morte infidelitatis et impietatis detinerentur.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, what was said afterward about the unbelievers, "who will give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead," does not imply that we must understand by the dead here those who have gone out of the body. For he may have called the unbelievers dead, that is, dead in soul, of whom it is said, "Let the dead bury their own dead," and the living those who believe in him, not hearing in vain: "Arise, you who sleep, and rise from the dead, and Christ will give you light"; of whom the Lord himself also says: "The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live." Accordingly, what Peter goes on to say, "For this reason the gospel was preached also to the dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit," does not compel us to understand it of the underworld. For this reason the gospel was preached in this life also to the dead, that is, to the unbelieving and the wicked, so that, when they believe, they may be judged according to men in the flesh, that is, in various tribulations and in the very death of the flesh (hence the same apostle says in another place that it is time for judgment to begin from the house of the Lord), but may live according to God in the spirit, because in this too they had been put to death, when they were held by the death of unbelief and impiety.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:22: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Pet 4:5–6; Matt 8:22; Eph 5:14; John 5:25; 1 Pet 4:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.21 (CSEL 44:539–540; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-21).

## Letter 164.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-22
- Source: CSEL 44:540–541
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine invites a better interpretation, notes he has answered Evodius's other questions by the deacon Asellus, and asks again for a copy of a lost letter.

### Latin text

Haec expositio uerborum Petri cui displicet uel cui, etiamsi non displicet, non tamen sufficit, quaerat ea secundum inferos intellegere. qui si ualuerit illa, quibus me moueri supra commemoraui, ita soluere, ut eorum auferat dubitationem, impertiat et mihi. quod si factum fuerit, poterunt illa uerba utroque modo intellegi; ista sententia de nulla falsitate conuincitur. ad illas autem quaestiones, quas ante misisti, excepta dei uisione per corpus, unde maius opus moliendum est, ut potui, respondi et per Asellum diaconum misi, quod te accepisse iam puto. in recenti autem commonitorio tuo, cui nunc respondi, duo quaesieras, quorum utrumque tractatum est, unum latius alterum breuius, de Petri scilicet apostoli uerbis et de anima domini. exemplum sane litterarum tuarum, quae continent interrogationem, utrum dei substantia corporaliter uelut in loco uideri possit, et apud nos nescio quo modo aberrarunt nec inueniri, cum diu quaererentur, potuerunt, iterum admoneo mittere ne graueris.

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever is displeased with this explanation of Peter's words, or, even if not displeased, finds it insufficient, let him seek to understand them as referring to the underworld. If he is able to resolve the points which I mentioned above as troubling me, so as to remove the doubt about them, let him share it with me too. If that happens, those words can be understood in both ways; this interpretation is convicted of no falsehood. As for the questions you sent earlier, except for the vision of God through a body, for which a greater work must be undertaken, I have answered as I could and sent it by the deacon Asellus, which I think you have already received. In your recent memorandum, to which I have now replied, you had asked two things, both of which have been treated, one at greater length and the other more briefly: namely, the words of the apostle Peter and the soul of the Lord. The copy of your letter containing the question whether the substance of God can be seen bodily as if in a place also went astray with us somehow and could not be found, though long sought; I remind you again, please do not mind sending it.

### Translation notes

- The earlier reply sent by Asellus is Ep. 162.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 164.22 (CSEL 44:540–541; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/164-1/#p-164-22).

## Letter 165.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-1
- Source: CSEL 44:541–543
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome writes to Marcellinus and Anapsychia, listing the opinions on the origin of the soul, referring them to his works against Rufinus and to Augustine.

### Latin text

Tandem ex Africa uestrae litteras unanimitatis accepi et non me paenitet inpudentiae, qua tacentibus uobis epistulas meas frequenter ingessi, ut rescriptum mererer et uos esse sospites non aliis nuntiantibus sed uestro potissimum sermone cognoscerem. super animae statu memini uestrae quaestiunculae, immo maximae ecclesiasticae quaestionis, utrum lapsa de caelo sit, ut Pythagoras philosophus omnesque Platonici et Origenes putant, an anippoia dei substantiae, ut Stoici, Manichaeus et Hispana Priscilliani haeresis suspicantur, an in thesauro habeantur dei olim conditae, ut quidam ecclesiastici stulta persuasione confidunt, an cotidie a deo fiant et mittantur in corpora secundum illud, quod in euangelio scriptum est: Pater meus usque modo operatur et ego operor, an certe ex traduce, ut Tertullianus, Apollinaris et maxima pars occidentalium autumat, ut quo modo corpus ex corpore sic anima nascatur ex anima et simili cum brutis animantibus condicione subsistat. super quo quid mihi uideretur, in opusculis contra Rufinum olim scripsisse me noui aduersus eum libellum, quem sanctae memoriae Anastasio, episcopo Romanae ecclesiae, dedit, in quo lubrica et subdola, immo stulta confessione, dum auditorum simplicitati inludere nititur, suae fidei, immo perfidiae inlusit. quos libros reor sanctum parentem uestrum habere Oceanum; olim enim editi sunt multas Rufini libri aduersus nos calumnias respuentes. certe habes ibi uirum sanctum et eruditum Augustinum episcopum, qui uiua, ut aiunt, uoce docere te poterit et suam, immo per se nostram explicare sententiam.

### English translation (Claude)

At last I have received a letter from your Unanimity from Africa, and I do not regret the shamelessness with which, while you were silent, I frequently pressed my letters on you, so that I might deserve a reply and learn that you are safe not from the reports of others but above all from your own words. About the state of the soul, I remember your little question, or rather the very great question of the church: whether it fell from heaven, as the philosopher Pythagoras and all the Platonists and Origen think; or is an emanation of the substance of God, as the Stoics, Mani, and the Spanish heresy of Priscillian suppose; or whether souls are kept in a treasury of God, created long ago, as certain churchmen confidently hold by a foolish persuasion; or are made by God daily and sent into bodies, according to what is written in the gospel, "My Father is working until now, and I am working"; or certainly are by transmission, as Tertullian, Apollinaris, and the greater part of the Westerners hold, so that, as body is born from body, so soul is born from soul, and subsists in a condition like that of the brute animals. What I thought on this, I know I wrote long ago in my little works against Rufinus, against the booklet which he gave to Anastasius of holy memory, bishop of the Roman church, in which, with a slippery and crafty, or rather foolish, confession, while trying to make sport of the simplicity of his hearers, he made sport of his own faith, or rather faithlessness. I think your holy relative Oceanus has those books; for they were published long ago, refuting the many slanders of Rufinus's books against us. Certainly you have there the holy and learned man, Bishop Augustine, who can teach you with a living voice, as they say, and explain his opinion, or rather through himself ours.

### Scripture references

- John 5:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Jerome to Marcellinus and his wife Anapsychia (ca. 410–412). "Emanation" reads the Greek ἀπόρροια, which the digital text garbles as "anippoia" (marked sic). Scripture: John 5:17. The polemic against Rufinus is Jerome's and is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 165.1 (CSEL 44:541–543; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-1).

## Letter 165.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-2
- Source: CSEL 44:543–544
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome explains that the sack of Rome and barbarian raids in the East have interrupted his Commentary on Ezekiel, of which he has sent two books to Fabiola.

### Latin text

Ezechielis uolumen olim adgredi uolui et sponsionem creberrimam studiosis lectoribus reddere, sed in ipso dictandi exordio ita animus meus occidentalium prouinciarum et maxime urbis Romae uastatione confusus est, ut iuxta uulgare prouerbium proprium quoque ignorarem uocabulum, diuque tacui sciens tempus esse lacrimarum. hoc autem anno, cum tres explicassem libros, subitus impetus barbarorum, de quibus tuus dicit Vergilius: Lateque uagantes Barcaei et sancta scriptura de Ismahel: Contra faciem omnium fratrum suorum habitabit, sic Aegypti limitem, Palaestinae, Phoenices, Syriae percucurrit ad instar torrentis cuncta secum trahens, ut uix manus eorum misericordia Christi potuerimus euadere. quod si iuxta inclitum oratorem silent inter arma leges, quanto magis studia scripturarum, quae et librorum multitudine et silentio ac librariorum sedulitate, quodque uel proprium est, securitate et otio dictantium indigent! duos itaque libros misi sanctae filiae meae Fabiolae, quorum exempla, si uolueris, ab ipsa poteris mutuari; pro angustia quippe temporis alios describere non potui. quos cum legeris et uestibula uideris, facilis coniectura erit, qualis ipsa futura sit domus. sed credo in dei misericordia, qui nos adiuuit in difficillimo principio supra dicti operis, quod ipse adiuuet et in paene ultimis prophetae partibus, in quibus Gog et Magog bella narrantur, et in extremis, in quibus sacratissimi et inexplicabilis templi aedificatio, uarietas mensuraque describitur.

### English translation (Claude)

I long ago wished to undertake the volume of Ezekiel and fulfill a promise very often made to studious readers; but at the very beginning of dictating, my mind was so confounded by the devastation of the western provinces and above all of the city of Rome that, as the common proverb says, I did not know even my own name; and I was long silent, knowing that it was a time for tears. But this year, when I had finished three books, a sudden onslaught of the barbarians, of whom your Virgil says, "and the Barcaei raging far and wide," and holy Scripture of Ishmael, "He shall dwell over against all his brothers," so overran the borders of Egypt, Palestine, Phoenicia, and Syria, like a torrent sweeping all before it, that by the mercy of Christ we could scarcely escape their hands. But if, as the famous orator says, laws are silent amid arms, how much more the study of the Scriptures, which needs a multitude of books, silence, and the diligence of copyists, and, what is most essential, security and leisure for those who dictate! I have therefore sent two books to my holy daughter Fabiola, copies of which you can borrow from her if you wish; for owing to the shortness of time I could not have others written out. When you read them and see the entrance halls, it will be easy to guess what the house itself will be like. But I trust in the mercy of God, who helped us in the very difficult beginning of the aforesaid work, that he will help also in the last parts of the prophet, in which the wars of Gog and Magog are narrated, and in the final parts, in which the building, variety, and measurement of the most sacred and inexplicable temple are described.

### Scripture references

- Gen 16:12: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 38:2: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 40:2: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 4.42–43 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Mil. 11 (Cicero): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Virgil, Aeneid 4.42–43 (Jerome's text reads "uagantes" for "furentes"); Cicero, Pro Milone 11; Gen 16:12; Ezek 38–39; Ezek 40–48. The "Fabiola" named here cannot be the Fabiola who died in 399; perhaps another person or a slip; uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 165.2 (CSEL 44:543–544; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-2).

## Letter 165.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-3
- Source: CSEL 44:544–545
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome commends Oceanus as able to instruct them and closes with a blessing.

### Latin text

Sanctus frater noster Oceanus, cui uos cupitis commendari, tantus ac talis est et sic eruditus in lege domini, ut absque nostro rogatu instruere uos possit et nostram super cunctis quaestionibus scripturarum pro modulo communis ingenii explicare sententiam. incolumes uos et prolixa aetate florentes Christus deus noster tueatur omnipotens, domini uere sancti.

### English translation (Claude)

Our holy brother Oceanus, to whom you wish to be commended, is so great and of such a kind, and so learned in the law of the Lord, that without our asking he can instruct you and explain our opinion on all questions of the Scriptures, according to the measure of our common understanding. May Christ our God, the Almighty, keep you safe and flourishing to a long age, truly holy lords.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 165.3 (CSEL 44:544–545; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-165-3).

## Letter 166.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-1
- Source: CSEL 44:545–547
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Jerome to consult him, as an old man still eager to learn, regretting the distance between them.

### Latin text

Deum nostrum, qui nos uocauit in suum regnum et gloriam, et rogaui et rogo, ut hoc, quod ad te scribo, sancte frater Hieronyme, consulens te de his, quae nescio, fructuosum esse nobis uelit. quamquam enim te multo quam ego sum, aetate maiorem tamen etiam ipse iam senex consulo; sed ad discendum, quod opus est, nulla mihi aetas sera uideri potest, quia, etsi senes magis decet docere quam discere, magis tamen discere quam, quid doceant, ignorare. nihil equidem molestius fero in omnibus angustiis meis, quas patior in difficillimis quaestionibus, quam in tam longinquo tuae caritatis absentiam, ut uix possim meas dare, uix recipere litteras tuas per interualla non dierum, non mensium sed aliquot annorum. cum, si fieri posset, cotidie praesentem te habere uellem, cum quo loquerer, quicquid uellem. nec ideo tamen non debui facere, quod potui, si non potui totum, quod uolui.

### English translation (Claude)

I have asked, and I ask, our God, who has called us into his kingdom and glory, that he may will this letter which I write to you, holy brother Jerome, consulting you about things I do not know, to be fruitful for us. For although I consult you as one much older than I am, I too am already an old man; but for learning what is needful no age can seem to me too late, because, though it befits old men more to teach than to learn, it befits them more to learn than to be ignorant of what they should teach. Nothing indeed do I bear more grievously in all my difficulties, which I suffer in the hardest questions, than the absence of your love at so great a distance, so that I can scarcely send my letters or receive yours at intervals not of days, not of months, but of several years; whereas, if it were possible, I would wish to have you present every day, to talk with you about whatever I wished. Yet I ought not on that account to fail to do what I could, even if I could not do all that I wished.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 2:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Augustine to Jerome, sent by Orosius (415), "On the origin of the soul". Scripture: 1 Thess 2:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.1 (CSEL 44:545–547; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-1).

## Letter 166.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-2
- Source: CSEL 44:547–548
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine introduces Orosius, a young Spanish presbyter fighting heresies in Spain, whom he has sent on to Jerome as the bearer of this letter.

### Latin text

Ecce uenit ad me religiosus iuuenis catholica pace frater, aetate filius, honore conpresbyter noster Orosius uigil ingenio, paratus eloquio, flagrans studio, utile uas in domo domini esse desiderans ad refellendas falsas perniciosasque doctrinas, quae animas Hispanorum multo infelicius quam corpora barbaricus gladius trucidarunt. nam inde ad nos usque ab Oceani litore properauit fama excitus, quod a me posset de his, quae scire uellet, quicquid uellet, audire. neque nullum cepit aduentus sui fructum: primo, ne de me multum famae crederet; deinde docui hominem, quod potui, quod autem non potui, unde discere posset, admonui atque, ut ad te iret, hortatus sum. qua in re consilium uel praeceptum meum cum libenter et oboedienter acciperet, rogaui eum, ut abs te ueniens per nos ad propria remearet. quam eius pollicitationem tenens occasionem mihi credidi a domino esse concessam, qua tibi scriberem de his, quae per te scire cupio. quaerebam enim, quem ad te mitterem, nec mihi facile occurrebat idoneus et fide agendi et alacritate oboediendi et exercitatione peregrinandi. ubi ergo istum iuuenem expertus sum, eum ipsum esse, qualem a domino petebam, dubitare non potui.

### English translation (Claude)

Behold, there has come to me a religious young man, a brother in Catholic peace, a son in age, in honor our fellow presbyter, Orosius, alert in mind, ready in speech, burning with zeal, desiring to be a useful vessel in the house of the Lord for refuting the false and pernicious doctrines which have slaughtered the souls of the Spaniards far more unhappily than the barbarian sword their bodies. For he hastened from there, from the shore of the Ocean, all the way to us, roused by the report that he could hear from me whatever he wished about the things he wished to know. And his coming has not been without some fruit: first, that he should not believe much of the report about me; then, I taught the man what I could, and, as for what I could not, I told him where he could learn it and urged him to go to you. When he accepted this counsel or instruction of mine willingly and obediently, I asked him, on his way back from you, to return home by way of us. Holding him to this promise, I believed that an opportunity had been granted me by the Lord to write to you about the things I desire to know through you. For I was looking for someone to send to you, and no one suitable readily occurred to me, both in faithfulness in acting, readiness in obeying, and experience in traveling. When, then, I had tested this young man, I could not doubt that he was just the kind of man I was asking the Lord for.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 2 Tim 2:21. The "false doctrines" in Spain are those of the Priscillianists and Origenists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.2 (CSEL 44:547–548; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-2).

## Letter 166.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-3
- Source: CSEL 44:548–550
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine states what he firmly holds: the soul is immortal in its own way but can die spiritually, and it is not a part of God, since it is changeable.

### Latin text

Accipe igitur, quae mihi peto aperire ac disserere non graueris. quaestio de anima multos mouet, in quibus et me esse confiteor. nam quid de anima firmissime teneam, non tacebo; deinde subiungam, quid mihi adhuc expediri uelim. anima hominis inmortalis est secundum quendam modum suum; non enim omni modo sicut deus, de quo dictum est, quod solus habeat inmortalitatem; nam de animae mortibus sancta scriptura multa commemorat, unde illud est: Sine mortuos sepelire mortuos suos. sed quod ita moritur alienata a uita dei, ut tamen in natura sua uiuere non omnino desistat, ita mortalis ex aliqua causa inuenitur, ut etiam inmortalis non sine ratione dicatur. non est pars dei anima. si enim hoc esset, omni modo incommutabilis atque incorruptibilis esset quod si esset, nec deficeret in deterius nec proficeret in melius nec aliquid in semet ipsa uel inciperet habere, quod non habebat, uel desineret habere, quod habebat, quantum ad eius ipsius affectiones pertinet. quam uero aliter se habeat, non opus est extrinsecus testimonio; quisquis se ipsum aduertit, agnoscit. frustra autem dicitur ab eis, qui animam dei esse partem uolunt, hanc eius labem ac turpitudinem, quam uidemus in nequissimis hominibus, hanc denique infirmitatem et aegritudinem, quam sentimus in omnibus hominibus, non ex ipsa illi esse sed ex corpore. quid interest, unde aegrotet, quae si esset incommutabilis, unde libet aegrotare non posset? nam quod uere incommutabile et incorruptibile est, nullius rei accessu commutari uel corrumpi potest; alioquin non Achillea tantum, sicut fabulae ferunt, sed omnis caro esset inuulnerabilis, si nullus ei casus accideret. non est itaque natura incommutabilis, quae aliquo modo, aliqua causa, aliqua parte mutabilis est. deum autem nefas est nisi uere summeque incommutabilem credere. non est igitur anima pars dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Receive, then, what I ask you not to mind opening and discussing for me. The question about the soul troubles many, among whom I confess that I too am. For I shall not be silent about what I hold most firmly about the soul; then I shall add what I still wish to have explained to me. The soul of man is immortal according to a certain manner of its own; for it is not immortal in every way, as God is, of whom it was said that he alone has immortality; for holy Scripture mentions many deaths of the soul, whence the saying: "Let the dead bury their own dead." But because it dies, estranged from the life of God, in such a way that it does not altogether cease to live in its own nature, it is found mortal for some reason in such a way that it is also not without reason called immortal. The soul is not a part of God. For if it were, it would be in every way unchangeable and incorruptible; and if it were, it would neither fall off to worse nor advance to better, nor would it either begin to have in itself anything it did not have or cease to have what it had, as far as its own affections are concerned. How differently it actually is needs no outside testimony; whoever pays attention to himself recognizes it. It is vainly said by those who want the soul to be a part of God that this stain and baseness of it which we see in the most wicked people, and this weakness and sickness which we feel in all people, come to it not from itself but from the body. What does it matter from where it falls sick, when, if it were unchangeable, it could not fall sick from anywhere? For what is truly unchangeable and incorruptible cannot be changed or corrupted by the approach of anything; otherwise not only Achilles, as the tales say, but all flesh would be invulnerable, if no mishap befell it. A nature, therefore, is not unchangeable which is changeable in some way, from some cause, in some part. But it is wicked to believe God to be anything but truly and supremely unchangeable. The soul, therefore, is not a part of God.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 8:22: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:18: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Tim 6:16; Matt 8:22 (Luke 9:60); Eph 4:18. The view that the soul is part of God was held by Manichaeans and Priscillianists (cf. Ep. 165.1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.3 (CSEL 44:548–550; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-3).

## Letter 166.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-4
- Source: CSEL 44:550–553
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds that the soul is incorporeal, being present whole in every part of the body, as shown by its perceiving a touch at any point.

### Latin text

Incorpoream quoque esse animam etsi difficile tardioribus persuaderi potest, mihi tamen fateor esse persuasum. sed ne uerbi controuersiam uel superfluo faciam uel merito patiar, quoniam, cum de re constat, non est opus certare de nomine. si corpus est omnis substantia uel essentia uel si quid aptius nuncupatur id, quod aliquo modo est in se ipso, corpus est anima. item si eam solam incorpoream placet appellare naturam, quae summe incommutabilis et ubique tota est, corpus est anima, quoniam tale aliquid ipsa non est. porro si corpus non est, nisi quod per loci spatium aliqua longitudine, latitudine, altitudine ita sistitur uel mouetur, ut maiore sui parte maiorem locum occupet et breuiore breuiorem minusque sit in parte quam in toto, non est corpus anima. per totum quippe corpus, quod animat, non locali diffusione sed quadam uitali intentione porrigitur; nam per omnes eius particulas tota simul adest nec minor in minoribus et in maioribus maior sed alicubi intentius alicubi remissius et in omnibus tota et in singulis tota est. neque enim aliter, quod in corpore etiam non toto sentit, tamen tota sentit; nam cum exiguo puncto in carne uiua aliquid tangitur, quamuis locus ille non solum totius corporis non sit, sed uix in corpore uideatur, animam tamen totam non latet neque id, quod sentitur, per corporis cuncta discurrit, sed ibi tantum sentitur, ubi fit. unde ergo ad totam mox peruenit, quod non in toto fit, nisi quia et ibi tota est, ubi fit, nec, ut tota ibi sit, cetera deserit? uiuunt enim et illa ea praesente, ubi nihil tale factum est. quod si fieret et utrumque simul fieret, simul utrumque totam pariter non lateret. proinde et in omnibus simul et in singulis particulis corporis sui tota simul esse non posset, si per illas ita diffunderetur, ut uidemus corpora diffusa per spatia locorum minoribus suis partibus minora occupare et amplioribus ampliora. quapropter si anima corpus esse dicenda est, non est certe corpus, quale terrenum est nec quale humidum aut aerium aut aetherium. omnia quippe talia maiora sunt in maioribus locis et minora in minoribus et nihil eorum in aliqua sui parte totum adest, sed, ut sunt partes locorum, ita occupantur partibus corporum. unde intellegitur, anima siue corpus siue incorporea dicenda sit, propriam quandam habere naturam omnibus his mundanae molis elementis excellentiore substantia creatam, quae ueraciter non possit in aliqua phantasia corporalium imaginum, quas per carnis sensus percipimus, cogitari, sed mente intellegi uitaque sentiri. neque haec perinde loquor, ut te, quae tibi nota sunt, doceam, sed ut aperiam, quid firmissime de anima teneam, ne me quisquam, cum ad ea uenero, quae requiro, nihil de anima uel scientia uel fide tenere arbitretur.

### English translation (Claude)

That the soul is also incorporeal, although this can be hard to persuade slower minds of, I confess I am persuaded. But lest I either needlessly start or deservedly suffer a dispute about a word (since, when the thing is agreed, there is no need to fight over the name): if every substance or essence, or whatever more fittingly names that which in some way exists in itself, is a body, then the soul is a body. Likewise, if one chooses to call incorporeal only that nature which is supremely unchangeable and everywhere whole, then the soul is a body, since it is not anything of that kind. But if nothing is a body except what is so placed or moved through a space of place, with some length, breadth, and height, that it occupies a larger place with a larger part of itself and a smaller with a smaller, and is less in a part than in the whole, then the soul is not a body. For it extends through the whole body which it animates, not by local diffusion but by a certain vital tension; for it is present whole at once through all its particles, not less in the smaller and greater in the larger, but more intensely in some places and more slackly in others, and it is whole in all and whole in each. For otherwise it would not perceive as a whole what it perceives in not the whole body; for when something touches the living flesh at a tiny point, although that place is not only not the whole body but scarcely seems to be in the body, it is nevertheless not hidden from the whole soul; nor does what is felt run through all parts of the body, but it is felt only where it happens. How, then, does what does not happen in the whole at once reach the whole soul, except that the soul is whole also where it happens, and does not desert the rest to be whole there? For those other parts too live by its presence, where nothing of the kind has happened. And if this did happen there too, and both happened at once, both alike would at once be known to the whole soul. Accordingly, it could not be whole at once both in all and in each of the particles of its body, if it were diffused through them in the way we see bodies diffused through spaces of places, occupying smaller spaces with their smaller parts and larger with larger. Therefore, if the soul is to be called a body, it is certainly not a body such as earth is, nor such as water, air, or ether. For all such things are greater in greater places and smaller in smaller, and none of them is present whole in any part of itself; but as there are parts of places, so they are occupied by parts of bodies. Hence it is understood that the soul, whether it is to be called body or incorporeal, has a certain nature of its own, created of a substance more excellent than all these elements of the world's mass, which cannot truly be thought of in any fantasy of bodily images which we perceive through the senses of the flesh, but is understood by the mind and felt by life. I say these things not to teach you what you know, but to make plain what I hold most firmly about the soul, lest anyone, when I come to the things I ask, should think that I hold nothing about the soul either by knowledge or by faith.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.4 (CSEL 44:550–553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-4).

## Letter 166.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-5
- Source: CSEL 44:553–554
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds that the soul fell by its own will and can be freed only by God's grace through Christ the mediator, without whom it will be punished.

### Latin text

Certus etiam sum animam nulla dei culpa, nulla dei necessitate uel sua sed propria uoluntate in peccatum esse conlapsam nec liberari posse de corpore mortis huius uel suae uoluntatis uirtute tamquam sibi ad hoc sufficiente uel ipsius corporis morte sed gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum nec omnino esse animam ullam in genere humano, cui non sit necessarius ad liberationem mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus. quaecumque autem sine gratia mediatoris et sacramento eius in qualibet corporis aetate de corpore exierit, et in poena futuram et in ultimo iudicio recepturam corpus ad poenam. si autem post generationem humanam, quae facta est ex Adam, regeneretur in Christo ad eius pertinens societatem, et requiem post mortem corporis habituram et corpus ad gloriam recepturam. haec sunt, quae de anima firmissime teneo.

### English translation (Claude)

I am certain also that the soul fell into sin through no fault of God, no necessity of God or of its own, but by its own will; and that it cannot be freed from the body of this death either by the power of its own will, as though sufficient for this, or by the death of the body itself, but by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord; and that there is absolutely no soul in the human race which does not need for its liberation the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. And whatever soul has gone out of the body, at any age of the body, without the grace of the mediator and his sacrament, will be in punishment and at the last judgment will receive its body back for punishment. But if, after the human generation which came about from Adam, it is regenerated in Christ, belonging to his fellowship, it will both have rest after the death of the body and receive the body back for glory. These are the things I hold most firmly about the soul.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 7:24–25; 1 Tim 2:5. "His sacrament": baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.5 (CSEL 44:553–554; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-5).

## Letter 166.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-6
- Source: CSEL 44:554–555
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome where an infant's soul contracts the guilt that makes baptism necessary, noting that Jerome himself affirmed original sin against Jovinian and in his Commentary on Jonah.

### Latin text

Nunc accipe, obsecro, quid requiram et noli me spernere; sic non te spernat, qui pro nobis dignatus est sperni. quaero, ubi contraxerit anima reatum, quo trahitur in condemnationem etiam infantis morte praeuenti, si ei per sacramentum, quo etiam paruuli baptizantur, Christi gratia non subuenerit. non enim es ex illis, qui modo noua quaedam garrire coeperunt dicentes nullum reatum esse ex Adam tractum, qui per baptismum in infante soluatur. quod te sapere si scirem, immo nisi te id non sapere scirem, nequaquam hoc abs te quaererem aut quaerendum putarem. sed quia tenemus de hac re sententiam tuam concinentem catholicae fundatissimae fidei, qua et Iouiniani uaniloquia redarguens adhibuisti testimonium ex libro Iob: Nemo mundus in conspectu tuo nec infans, cuius est diei unius uita super terram, deinde adiunxisti: 'Tenemurque rei in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae et liber tuus in Ionam prophetam satis hoc insigniter dilucideque declarat, ubi ieiunare paruulos propter ipsum originale peccatum merito coactos esse dixisti, non inconuenienter abs te quaero, hunc reatum anima ubi contraxerit, unde oporteat eam etiam in illa aetate per sacramentum Christianae gratiae liberari.

### English translation (Claude)

Now hear, I beg you, what I ask, and do not despise me; so may he not despise you who deigned to be despised for us. I ask where the soul contracted the guilt by which it is dragged into condemnation, even that of an infant overtaken by death, if the grace of Christ has not come to its aid through the sacrament by which even little ones are baptized. For you are not one of those who have lately begun to chatter certain novelties, saying that there is no guilt drawn from Adam to be dissolved in an infant by baptism. If I knew that you held that, or rather, if I did not know that you do not hold it, I would by no means ask this of you or think it should be asked. But since we hold your opinion on this matter, in harmony with the most firmly founded Catholic faith, by which, refuting the empty talk of Jovinian, you brought forward the testimony from the book of Job, "No one is clean in your sight, not even an infant whose life on earth is one day," and then added, "and we are held guilty in the likeness of Adam's transgression"; and your book on the prophet Jonah declares this quite remarkably and clearly, where you said that the little ones were rightly compelled to fast on account of original sin itself; I not unfittingly ask you where the soul contracted this guilt, from which it must be freed even at that age through the sacrament of Christian grace.

### Scripture references

- Job 14:4: quotation, high confidence
- Job 14:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:14: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 3:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Job 14:4–5 (Old Latin/LXX form); Rom 5:14; Jonah 3:5–7. Jerome, Against Jovinian 2.2; Commentary on Jonah 3. "Those who have lately begun to chatter novelties": the Pelagians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.6 (CSEL 44:554–555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-6).

## Letter 166.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-7
- Source: CSEL 44:555–557
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In On Free Will Augustine left open four views on the soul's origin, leaving out the Manichaean view that it is part of God; now he asks Jerome which of the four is true, consistent with infants' need of Christ.

### Latin text

Ego quidem ante aliquot annos, cum libros quosdam scriberem de libero arbitrio, qui in multorum manus exierunt et habentur a plurimis, quattuor opiniones de animae incarnatione, utrum ex illa una, quae primo homini data est, ceterae propagentur, an singulis quibusque nouae etiam modo fiant, an alicubi iam existentes uel mittantur diuinitus uel sponte labantur in corpora, ita putaui esse tractandas, ut, quaelibet earum uera esset, non impediret intentionem meam, qua tunc aduersus eos quantis poteram uiribus agebam, qui naturam mali suo principio praeditam aduersus deum conantur inducere, id est contra Manichaeos; nam de Priscillianistis adhuc nihil audieram, qui non multum ab istis dissimiles blasphemias fabulantur. ideo quintam opinionem non addidi, quam in tua epistula inter ceteras commemorasti, ne aliquam praeterires, ubi de hac quaestione interroganti rescripsisti religiosae memoriae uiro nobisque in Christi caritate gratissimo Marcellino, quod anima sit pars dei, primo quia non de incarnatione eius sed de natura quaeritur, cum hoc quaeritur, deinde quia hoc sentiunt illi, contra quos agebam, et id maxime agebam, ut creatoris inculpabilem inuiolabilemque naturam a creaturae uitiis et labe secernerem, cum illi a substantia mali, cui proprium principium principesque tribuunt, ipsam boni dei substantiam ex parte, qua capta est, corruptam et oppressam et ad peccandi necessitatem perductam esse contendant. hoc itaque excepto haereticae opinionis errore ex quattuor reliquis opinionibus quaenam sit eligenda, scire desidero. quaecumque enim eligenda est, absit, ut inpugnet hanc fidem, de qua certi sumus, omni animae etiam paruuli infantis necessariam esse liberationem ex obligatione peccati eamque nullam esse nisi per Iesum Christum et hunc crucifixum.

### English translation (Claude)

Some years ago, when I was writing certain books on free will, which have gone out into many hands and are held by very many, I thought that the four opinions about the incarnation of the soul (whether the others are propagated from that one which was given to the first man; or new souls are made even now for each individual; or souls already existing somewhere are either sent by God or slip of their own accord into bodies) should be treated in such a way that, whichever of them was true, it would not hinder my purpose, by which I was then acting with all the strength I could against those who try to introduce a nature of evil endowed with its own principle against God, that is, against the Manichaeans; for I had not yet heard anything of the Priscillianists, who fabricate blasphemies not very different from theirs. That is why I did not add the fifth opinion, which you mentioned among the others in your letter (so as not to pass over any) where, when asked about this question, you wrote back to Marcellinus, a man of religious memory and most dear to us in the love of Christ, namely that the soul is a part of God: first, because when this is asked, the question is not about its incarnation but about its nature; second, because this is what those held against whom I was acting, and I was chiefly concerned to separate the blameless and inviolable nature of the Creator from the faults and stain of the creature, since they contend that the very substance of the good God, in the part in which it was captured, was corrupted, oppressed, and brought to the necessity of sinning by the substance of evil, to which they attribute its own principle and princes. Setting aside, then, this error of a heretical opinion, I wish to know which of the four remaining opinions should be chosen. For whichever is to be chosen, God forbid that it should attack this faith of which we are certain: that every soul, even of a little infant, needs liberation from the bond of sin, and that there is none except through Jesus Christ and him crucified.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine, On Free Will 3.20.56–21.59. Jerome's letter to Marcellinus is Ep. 165 in this collection. Scripture: 1 Cor 2:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.7 (CSEL 44:555–557; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-7).

## Letter 166.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-8
- Source: CSEL 44:557–558
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome holds that God creates each soul at birth, citing John 5:17, and referred Marcellinus to Augustine; Augustine wishes to share this view but cannot yet affirm it.

### Latin text

Proinde, ne longum faciamus, hoc certe sentis, quod singulas animas singulis nascentibus etiam modo deus faciat. cui sententiae ne obiciatur, quod omnes creaturas sexto die consummauerit deus, septimo requieuerit, adhibes testimonium ex euangelio: Pater meus usque nunc operatur. sic enim ad Marcellinum scripsisti, in qua epistula etiam mei commemorationem beniuolentissime facere dignatus es, quod hic me haberet in Africa, qui ei possem istam facilius explicare sententiam. quod si potuissem, non ille hoc abs te tam longe posito inquireret, si tamen id tibi ex Africa scripsit. nam quando scripserit, nescio; tantum scio, quod de hoc bene cognouerit cunctationem meam, unde me inconsulto facere uoluit. quamquam etiam si consuleret, magis hortarer et gratias agerem, quod nobis conferri omnibus posset, nisi tu breuiter rescribere quam respondere maluisses, credo ne superfluo laborares, ubi ego essem, quem putabas id optime scire, quod ille quaesierat. ecce uolo, ut illa sententia etiam mea sit, sed nondum esse confirmo.

### English translation (Claude)

To be brief, then: you certainly hold that God makes individual souls even now for individuals at birth. Lest it be objected to this opinion that God completed all creatures on the sixth day and rested on the seventh, you bring forward the testimony from the gospel: "My Father is working until now." For so you wrote to Marcellinus, in which letter you deigned most kindly to mention me too, saying that he had me here in Africa, who could more easily explain this opinion to him. If I could have done so, he would not have asked it of you, placed so far away, if indeed he wrote to you from Africa. For when he wrote I do not know; I only know that he was well aware of my hesitation on this matter, which is why he wished to do it without consulting me. Although, even if he had consulted me, I would rather have encouraged him and thanked him, since it could have been shared with all of us, had you not preferred to write back briefly rather than to answer, I believe so as not to labor needlessly where I was, whom you thought to know very well what he had asked. See, I wish that opinion to be mine too, but I do not yet affirm that it is.

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 2:2; John 5:17. Jerome, Ep. 165.1 (in this collection).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.8 (CSEL 44:557–558; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-8).

## Letter 166.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-9
- Source: CSEL 44:558–560
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to teach him what to teach, recalling that Christ is the one Teacher who teaches through others, and that humility in learning is a test.

### Latin text

Misisti ad me discipulos, ut eam rem doceam, quam nondum ipse didici. doce ergo, quod doceam; nam ut doceam, multi a me flagitant eisque me sicut alia multa et hoc ignorare confiteor. et fortasse, quamuis in os meum uerecundentur, tamen apud se dicunt: Tu es magister in Israhel et haec ignoras! quod quidem dominus ei dixit, qui erat unus illorum, quos delectabat uocari rabbi, unde etiam ad uerum magistrum nocte uenerat, quia fortassis erubescebat discere, qui docere consueuerat. me autem magistrum potius audire quam uelut magistrum delectat audiri. recolo enim, quid dixerit eis, quos prae ceteris elegit: Vos autem, inquit, nolite uocari ab hominibus rabbi; unus est enim magister uester Christus. nec alius docuit Moysen etiam per Iothor nec alius Cornelium etiam per priorem Petrum nec alius Petrum etiam per posteriorem Paulum; a quocumque uerum dicitur, illo donante dicitur, qui est ipsa ueritas. quid, si ideo adhuc ista nescimus et ea neque orando neque legendo neque cogitando et ratiocinando inuenire potuimus, ut probemur, non solum indoctos quanta caritate doceamus, uerum a doctis etiam quanta humilitate discamus?

### English translation (Claude)

You have sent disciples to me, for me to teach them a thing I have not yet learned myself. Teach me, then, what to teach; for many demand of me that I teach, and to them I confess that I do not know this, as many other things. And perhaps, although they are too modest to say it to my face, yet among themselves they say: "You are a teacher in Israel and do not know these things!" That is what the Lord said to the man who was one of those who delighted to be called rabbi, which is why he had come to the true Teacher by night, because perhaps he was ashamed to learn, being accustomed to teach. But I am more delighted to listen to the Teacher than to be listened to as a teacher. For I recall what he said to those whom he chose above the rest: "But you, do not be called rabbi by men; for one is your Teacher, Christ." Nor did any other teach Moses, even through Jethro, nor any other Cornelius, even through Peter, who was earlier, nor any other Peter, even through Paul, who was later; by whomever the truth is spoken, it is spoken by the gift of him who is the Truth itself. What if we still do not know these things, and have not been able to find them by praying, reading, or thinking and reasoning, precisely so that we may be tested, not only with how much love we teach the unlearned, but also with how much humility we learn from the learned?

### Scripture references

- John 3:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:2: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 23:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 23:8: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 18:19: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 10:34: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- John 14:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: John 3:10; John 3:2; Matt 23:7–8; Exod 18:13–24; Acts 10; Gal 2:11–14; John 14:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.9 (CSEL 44:558–560; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-9).

## Letter 166.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-10
- Source: CSEL 44:560–561
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If each soul is newly created, Augustine cannot see how unbaptized infants can justly be condemned, and he asks Jerome how this view can be defended.

### Latin text

Doce ergo, quaeso, quod doceam, doce, quod teneam, et dic mihi, si animae singillatim singulis hodieque nascentibus fiunt, ubi in paruulis peccent, ut indigeant in sacramento Christi remissione peccati peccantes in Adam, ex quo caro est propagata peccati, aut, si non peccant, qua iustitia creatoris ita peccato obligantur alieno, cum exinde propagatis membris mortalibus inseruntur, ut eas, nisi per ecclesiam subuentum fuerit, damnatio consequatur, cum in earum potestate non sit, ut eis possit gratia baptismi subueniri. tot igitur animarum milia, quae in mortibus paruulorum sine indulgentia Christiani sacramenti de corporibus exeunt, qua aequitate damnantur, si nouae creatae nullo suo praecedente peccato sed uoluntate creatoris singulae singulis nascentibus adhaeserunt, quibus eas animandis ille creauit et dedit, qui utique nouerat, quod unaquaeque earum nulla sua culpa sine baptismo Christi de corpore fuerat exitura? quoniam igitur neque de deo possumus dicere, quod uel cogat animas fieri peccatrices uel puniat innocentes, neque negare fas nobis est eas, quae sine Christi sacramento de corporibus exierint, etiam paruulorum non nisi in damnationem trahi, obsecro te, quo modo haec opinio defenditur, qua creduntur animae non ex illa una primi hominis fieri omnes sed sicut illa una uni ita singulis singulae?

### English translation (Claude)

Teach, then, I beg you, what I should teach, teach what I should hold, and tell me: if souls are made individually for individuals born even today, where do they sin in little ones, so that they need forgiveness of sin in the sacrament of Christ, as sinning in Adam, from whom the flesh of sin has been propagated? Or, if they do not sin, by what justice of the Creator are they so bound by another's sin, when they are put into the mortal members propagated from him, that condemnation follows them unless help comes through the church, since it is not in their power to obtain the help of the grace of baptism? So many thousands of souls, then, which in the deaths of little ones go out of their bodies without the pardon of the Christian sacrament, with what equity are they condemned, if, newly created, with no preceding sin of their own but by the will of the Creator, they were joined one each to each individual born, for whose animation he created and gave them, he who certainly knew that each one of them, through no fault of its own, would go out of the body without the baptism of Christ? Since, therefore, we can neither say of God that he either compels souls to become sinners or punishes the innocent, nor is it lawful for us to deny that those souls, even of little ones, which have gone out of their bodies without the sacrament of Christ, are drawn only to condemnation, I beg you, how is this opinion defended, by which souls are believed not all to be made from that one of the first man, but each for each, as that one was for one?

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:3: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Rom 8:3 ("flesh of sin"). Augustine's teaching on the condemnation of unbaptized infants is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.10 (CSEL 44:560–561; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-10).

## Letter 166.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-11
- Source: CSEL 44:561–563
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Opponents answer the appeal to John 5:17 by saying God's ongoing work is governance, not new creation, since Genesis says he finished creating.

### Latin text

Ea uero, quae dicuntur alia contra hanc opinionem, facile puto me posse refellere, sicuti est illud, quo eam sibi quidam uidentur urgere, quo modo consummauerit deus omnia opera sua sexto die et septimo requieuerit, si nouas adhuc animas creat. quibus si dixerimus, quod ex euangelio in supra dicta epistula posuisti: Pater meus usque nunc operatur, respondent: Operatur dictum est institutas administrando, non nouas instituendo naturas, ne scripturae geneseos contradicatur, ubi apertissime legitur consummasse deum omnia opera sua. nam et quod eum scriptum est requieuisse, utique a creandis nouis creaturis intellegendum est, non a gubernandis. quia tunc ea, quae non erant, fecit, a quibus faciendis requieuit, quia consummauerat omnia, quae, antequam essent, uidit esse facienda, ut deinceps non ea, quae non erant, sed ex his, quae iam erant, crearet et faceret, quicquid faceret. ita utrumque uerum esse monstratur, et quod dictum est: Requieuit ab operibus suis et quod dictum est: Usque nunc operatur, quoniam genesi non potest euangelium esse contrarium.

### English translation (Claude)

The other things which are said against this opinion I think I can easily refute, such as that by which some think they press hard against it: how God completed all his works on the sixth day and rested on the seventh, if he still creates new souls. If we say to them what you set down from the gospel in the aforesaid letter, "My Father is working until now," they answer: "'Is working' was said of administering natures already established, not of establishing new ones, lest the Scripture of Genesis be contradicted, where we read most plainly that God completed all his works. For the statement that he rested is certainly to be understood of creating new creatures, not of governing them; because then he made the things which did not exist, from the making of which he rested, because he had completed all the things which, before they existed, he saw should be made, so that from then on he would create and make whatever he made not of things which did not exist but from those which already existed. Thus both are shown to be true, both what was said, 'He rested from his works,' and what was said, 'He is working until now,' since the gospel cannot be contrary to Genesis."

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 2:2; John 5:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.11 (CSEL 44:561–563; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-11).

## Letter 166.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-12
- Source: CSEL 44:563–565
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers that the creation of new souls does not contradict God's rest, since God is multiplying a kind he already made on the sixth day, man in his image.

### Latin text

Verum his, qui haec ideo dicunt, ne credatur modo deus sicut illam unam nouas animas, quae non erant, facere, sed ex illa una, quae iam erat, eas creare uel ex fonte aliquo siue thesauro quodam, quem tunc fecit, eas mittere, facile respondetur etiam illis sex diebus multa deum creasse ex his naturis, quas iam creauerat, sicut ex aquis alites et pisces, ex terra autem arbores, faenum, animalia. sed quod ea, quae non erant, tunc fecerit, manifestum est; nulla enim erat auis, nullus piscis, nulla arbor, nullum animal et bene intellegitur ab his creatis requieuisse, quae non erant et creata sunt, id est cessasse, ne ultra, quae non erant, crearentur. sed nunc quod dicitur animas non in nescio quo fonte iam existentes mittere nec de se ipso tamquam suas particulas inrorare nec de illa una originaliter trahere nec pro delictis ante carnem commissis carneis uinculis compedire sed nouas creare singulas singulis suam cuique nascenti, non aliquid facere dicitur, quod ante non fecerat. iam enim sexto die fecerat hominem ad imaginem suam, quod utique secundum animam rationalem fecisse intellegitur. hoc et nunc facit non instituendo, quod non erat, sed multiplicando, quod erat. unde et illud uerum est, quod a rebus, quae non erant, instituendis requieuit, et hoc uerum est, quod non solum gubernando, quae fecit, uerum etiam aliquid, non quod nondum sed quod iam creauerat, numerosius creando usque nunc operatur. uel sic ergo uel alio quolibet modo eximus ab eo, quod nobis obicitur de requie dei ab operibus suis, ne propterea non credamus nunc usque fieri animas nouas non ex illa una sed sicut illam unam.

### English translation (Claude)

But to those who say these things so that it may not be believed that God now makes new souls, which did not exist, as he made that one, but creates them from that one which already existed, or sends them from some fountain or treasury which he made then, it is easily answered that even in those six days God created many things from natures which he had already created, as birds and fish from the waters, and trees, grass, and animals from the earth. But that he then made things which did not exist is manifest; for there was no bird, no fish, no tree, no animal; and he is rightly understood to have rested from creating those things which did not exist and were created, that is, to have ceased, so that no more things which did not exist should be created. But now, when it is said that he does not send souls already existing in some fountain or other, nor sprinkle them from himself as particles of his own, nor draw them originally from that one, nor fetter them with fleshly bonds for offenses committed before the flesh, but creates new ones, individually for individuals, his own for each one born, he is not said to do something which he had not done before. For already on the sixth day he had made man in his image, which he is certainly understood to have done according to the rational soul. This he does now too, not by establishing what did not exist, but by multiplying what did. Hence both this is true, that he rested from establishing things which did not exist, and this is true, that he is working until now, not only by governing what he made, but also by creating more numerously something which he had not now first created but had already created. Either in this way, then, or in any other way, we escape what is objected to us about God's rest from his works, so that we need not refuse on this account to believe that new souls are made even now, not from that one but like that one.

### Scripture references

- Gen 1:20: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:24: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 1:27: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Gen 1:20–27; Gen 2:2; John 5:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.12 (CSEL 44:563–565; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-12).

## Letter 166.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-13
- Source: CSEL 44:565–566
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God may create souls for infants who die soon either to expose or chastise their parents' sins, or as part of the ordered "song" of time whose measures he determines.

### Latin text

Nam quod dicitur: Quare facit animas eis, quos nouit cito morituros? possumus respondere parentum hinc peccata uel conuinci uel flagellari. possumus etiam recte illius moderationi ista relinquere, quem scimus omnibus temporaliter transeuntibus rebus, ubi sunt etiam animalium ortus et obitus, cursum ornatissimum atque ordinatissimum dare, sed nos ista sentire non posse, quae si sentiremus, delectatione ineffabili mulceremur. non enim frustra per prophetam, qui haec diuinitus inspirata didicerat, dictum est de deo: Qui profert numerose saeculum. unde musica, id est scientia sensusue modulandi ad admonitionem magnae rei etiam mortalibus rationales habentibus animas dei largitate concessa est. unde si homo faciendi artifex carminis nouit, quas quibus moras uocibus tribuat, ut illud, quod canitur, decedentibus ac succedentibus sonis pulcherrime currat et transeat, quanto magis deus, cuius sapientia, per quam fecit omnia, longe omnibus artibus praeferenda est, nulla in naturis nascentibus et occidentibus temporum spatia, quae tamquam syllabae ac uerba ad particulas huius saeculi pertinent, in hoc labentium rerum tamquam mirabili cantico uel breuius uel productius, quam modulatio praecognita et praefinita deposcit, praeterire permittit! hoc cum etiam de arboris folio dixerim et de nostrorum numero capillorum, quanto magis de hominis ortu et occasu, cuius temporalis uita breuius productiusue non tenditur, quam deus dispositor temporum nouit uniuersitatis moderamini consonare!

### English translation (Claude)

As for the question, "Why does he make souls for those whom he knows will soon die?", we can answer that by this the sins of the parents are either exposed or chastised. We can also rightly leave these things to the governance of him who we know gives a most beautiful and most ordered course to all things that pass in time, among which are also the births and deaths of animals, though we cannot perceive these things; if we did perceive them, we would be soothed with unspeakable delight. For not in vain was it said of God through the prophet who had learned these things by divine inspiration: "Who brings forth the world in measured order." Hence music, that is, the knowledge or sense of measured movement, has been granted by God's generosity even to mortals who have rational souls, as a reminder of a great thing. Hence, if a man who is a craftsman in making a song knows what durations to assign to which notes, so that what is sung may run and pass most beautifully with sounds departing and succeeding, how much more does God, whose wisdom, through which he made all things, is to be preferred far above all arts, allow no spans of time in natures that are born and die, which are like syllables and words belonging to the parts of this age, to pass in this wonderful song, as it were, of passing things, either more briefly or more lengthily than the measure foreknown and predetermined demands! Since I would say this even of the leaf of a tree and of the number of our hairs, how much more of the birth and death of a human being, whose temporal life is not extended more briefly or more lengthily than God, the disposer of times, knows to harmonize with the governance of the universe!

### Scripture references

- Isa 40:26: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulg.): allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 10:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- "Who brings forth the world in measured order": Isa 40:26 in the Old Latin (from the Septuagint, ὁ ἐκφέρων κατὰ ἀριθμὸν τὸν κόσμον αὐτοῦ, in the Latin taken as "world/age"). Scripture also: Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulgate); Matt 10:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.13 (CSEL 44:565–566; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-13).

## Letter 166.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-14
- Source: CSEL 44:566–567
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The objection that nothing that begins in time can be immortal is refuted by the immortality of Christ's risen flesh.

### Latin text

Id etiam, quod aiunt omne, quod in tempore coepit esse, inmortale esse non posse, quia omnia orta occidunt et aucta senescunt, ut eo modo credi cogant animum humanum ideo esse inmortalem, quod ante omnia tempora sit creatus, non mouet fidem nostram; ut enim alia taceam, coepit esse in tempore inmortalitas carnis Christi, quae tamen iam non moritur et mors ei ultra non dominabitur.

### English translation (Claude)

And what they say, that whatever began to exist in time cannot be immortal, because "all things that arise perish and all that grow grow old," so as to compel the belief that the human mind is immortal for the reason that it was created before all times, does not trouble our faith; for, to say nothing of other things, the immortality of Christ's flesh began to exist in time, yet it now dies no more and death will no longer have dominion over it.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Jug. 2.3 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- "All things that arise perish and all that grow grow old": Sallust, Jugurtha 2.3. Scripture: Rom 6:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.14 (CSEL 44:566–567; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-14).

## Letter 166.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-15
- Source: CSEL 44:567–568
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The objection that God would not give souls to children conceived in adultery does not trouble Augustine; Jerome's comparison of stolen seed answers it, since God brings good out of human sin.

### Latin text

Illud uero, quod in libro aduersus Rufinum posuisti, quosdam huic sententiae calumniari, quod deum dare animas adulterinis conceptibus uideatur indignum, unde conantur adstruere meritis gestae ante carnem uitae animas quasi ad ergastula huius modi iuste posse perduci, non me mouet multa cogitantem, quibus haec possit calumnia refutari. et quod ipse respondisti non esse uitium sementis in tritico, quod furto dicitur esse sublatum, sed in eo, qui frumenta furatus est, nec idcirco terram non debuisse gremio suo semina confouere, quia sator inmunda ea proiecerit manu, elegantissima similitudo est. quam et antequam legerem, nullas mihi obiectio ista de adulterinis fetibus in hac quaestione faciebat angustias generaliter intuenti multa bona deum facere etiam de nostris malis nostrisque peccatis. animalis autem cuiuscumque creatio si habeat prudentem piumque consideratorem, ineffabilem laudem creatori excitat, quanto magis creatio non cuiuslibet animalis sed hominis! si autem causa creandi quaeritur, nulla citius et melius respondetur, nisi quia omnis creatura dei bona est; et quid dignius, quam ut bona faciat bonus deus, quae nemo potest facere nisi deus?

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you set down in your book against Rufinus, that some slander this opinion on the ground that it seems unworthy for God to give souls to adulterous conceptions, from which they try to establish that souls can justly be brought into such prison-houses, as it were, for the merits of a life lived before the flesh, this does not trouble me, since I can think of many ways in which this slander can be refuted. And your own answer, that the fault is not in the seed of wheat which is said to have been stolen, but in the one who stole the grain, and that the earth ought not therefore to refuse to cherish the seeds in its bosom because the sower cast them with an unclean hand, is a most elegant comparison. Even before I read it, this objection about adulterous offspring caused me no difficulty in this question, since I considered in general that God makes many good things even out of our evils and our sins. For the creation of any animal whatever, if it has a prudent and godly observer, stirs up unspeakable praise of the Creator; how much more the creation not of just any animal but of a human being! And if the reason for creating is asked, no answer is quicker or better than that every creature of God is good; and what is more fitting than that the good God should make good things, which no one but God can make?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome, Apology against Rufinus 3.28. Scripture: 1 Tim 4:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.15 (CSEL 44:567–568; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-15).

## Letter 166.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-16
- Source: CSEL 44:568–570
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine is at a loss to explain the sufferings of infants in this life, and their condemnation if unbaptized, if their souls are newly created and sinless.

### Latin text

Haec et alia, quae possum, sicut possum, dico aduersus eos, qui hanc opinionem, qua creduntur animae sicut illa una singulis fieri, labefactare conantur. sed cum ad poenas uentum est paruulorum, magnis, mihi crede, coartor angustiis nec, quid respondeam, prorsus inuenio, non solum eas poenas dico, quas habet post hanc uitam illa damnatio, quo necesse est trahantur, si de corpore exierint sine Christianae gratiae sacramento, sed eas ipsas, quae in hac uita dolentibus nobis uersantur ante oculos, quas enumerare si uelim, prius tempus quam exempla deficiunt. languescunt aegritudinibus, torquentur doloribus, fame et siti cruciantur, debilitantur membris, priuantur sensibus, uexantur ab inmundis spiritibus. demonstrandum est utique, quo modo ista sine ulla sua mala causa iuste patiantur. non enim dici fas est aut ista ignorante deo fieri aut eum non posse resistere facientibus aut iniuste ista uel facere uel permittere. num quidnam, sicut animalia inrationabilia recte dicimus in usus dari naturis excellentioribus etsi uitiosis, sicut apertissime in euangelio uidemus porcos ad usum desideratum concessos esse daemonibus, hoc et de homine recte possumus dicere? animal est enim sed rationale etsi mortale. anima est rationalis in illis membris, quae tantis afflictionibus poenas luit. deus bonus est, deus iustus est, deus omnipotens est; hoc dubitare omnino dementis est tantorum ergo malorum, quae fiunt in paruulis, causa iusta dicatur. nempe cum maiores ista patiuntur, solemus dicere aut sicut in Iob merita examinari aut sicut in Herode peccata puniri et de quibusdam exemplis, quae deus manifesta esse uoluit, alia quae obscura sunt, hominum coniecturae conceditur. sed hoc in maioribus. de paruulis autem quid respondeamus, edissere, si poenis tantis nulla in eis sunt punienda peccata; nam utique nulla est in illis aetatibus examinanda iustitia.

### English translation (Claude)

These and other things, as I can, I say against those who try to undermine this opinion, by which souls are believed to be made for individuals as that one was. But when it comes to the punishments of little ones, believe me, I am pressed by great difficulties and find absolutely nothing to answer; I mean not only those punishments which that condemnation holds after this life, to which they must be dragged if they go out of the body without the sacrament of Christian grace, but those very ones which, to our grief, are before our eyes in this life, which, if I wished to enumerate them, time would fail before examples. They languish with illnesses, are racked with pains, tormented by hunger and thirst, crippled in their limbs, deprived of senses, harassed by unclean spirits. It must certainly be shown how they justly suffer these things without any evil cause of their own. For it is not lawful to say either that these things happen without God's knowledge, or that he cannot resist those who do them, or that he unjustly either does or permits them. Just as we rightly say that irrational animals are given for the use of more excellent natures, even if vicious ones (as we most plainly see in the gospel that pigs were granted to the demons for the use they desired), can we rightly say this also of man? For he is an animal, but rational, though mortal. There is a rational soul in those members which pays the penalty with such great afflictions. God is good, God is just, God is almighty; to doubt this is utter madness. Let a just cause, then, be stated for such great evils as happen in little ones. Indeed, when adults suffer these things, we usually say either that their merits are being tested, as in Job, or that their sins are being punished, as in Herod; and from certain examples which God willed to be manifest, human conjecture is allowed about other things which are obscure. But this is in adults. Tell me, then, what we should answer about little ones, if there are no sins in them to be punished by such great penalties; for certainly in those ages there is no righteousness to be tested.

### Scripture references

- Mark 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 5:13: allusion, high confidence
- Job 1:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 12:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Mark 5:12–13 (Matt 8:31–32); Job 1–2; Acts 12:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.16 (CSEL 44:568–570; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-16).

## Letter 166.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-17
- Source: CSEL 44:570–571
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The inborn differences of intelligence also raise difficulties for the view that each soul is newly created.

### Latin text

De ingeniorum uero diuersitate quid dicam? quae quidem in paruulis latet, sed ab ipsis exordiis naturalibus ductum apparet in grandibus, quorum nonnulli tam tardi et obliuiosi sunt, ut ne prima quidem discere litterarum elementa potuerint, quidam uero tantae sunt fatuitatis, ut non multum a pecoribus differant, quos moriones uulgo uocant. respondetur fortasse: Corpora hoc faciunt. sed numquid secundum hanc sententiam, quam defendi uolumus, anima sibi corpus elegit et in eligendo cum falleretur, errauit? aut, cum in corpus cogeretur intrare necessitate nascendi, alia corpora praeoccupantibus animarum turbis ipsa aliud non inuenit et sicut in spectaculo aliquo locum ita carnem, non quam uoluit, sed quam ualuit, occupauit? numquid haec et talia dicere possumus uel sentire debemus? doce igitur, quid sentire, quid dicere debeamus, ut constet nobis ratio nouarum animarum singulis corporibus singillatimque factarum.

### English translation (Claude)

What shall I say of the diversity of talents? It is hidden in little ones, but, drawn from their very natural beginnings, it appears in adults, some of whom are so slow and forgetful that they cannot learn even the first elements of letters, while some are of such stupidity that they differ little from cattle; people commonly call them morons. Perhaps it is answered: "Bodies cause this." But according to this opinion which we want defended, did the soul choose a body for itself and err in choosing when it was deceived? Or, when it was compelled to enter a body by the necessity of being born, did it find no other because crowds of souls had seized the other bodies first, and, as with a seat at some show, take possession of a flesh, not the one it wanted, but the one it could get? Can we say such things, or ought we to think them? Teach me, then, what we ought to think and say, so that the reasoning for new souls made for individual bodies one by one may stand firm for us.

### Translation notes

- "Morons" renders moriones, the popular word for the mentally disabled.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.17 (CSEL 44:570–571; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/165-1/#p-166-17).

## Letter 166.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-18
- Source: CSEL 44:571–573
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes his own earlier answer in On Free Will: infants' sufferings may correct their parents, and God may compensate the infants, as with the Holy Innocents honored as martyrs.

### Latin text

Ego quidem non de ingeniis sed saltem de poenis paruulorum, quas in hac uita patiuntur, dixi aliquid in libris illis de libero arbitrio. quod quale sit et cur mihi in ista, quam habemus in manibus, quaestione non sufficiat, intimabo et eum ipsum de tertio libro locum excerptum his litteris inseram. nam ita se habet: De cruciatibus autem corporis, quibus affliguntur paruuli, quorum per aetatem nulla peccata sunt, si animae, quibus animantur, non prius quam ipsi homines esse coeperunt, maior querela et quasi misericors deponi solet. cum dicitur: Quid mali fecerunt, ut ista paterentur? quasi possit esse innocentiae meritum, antequam quisque nocere aliquid possit! cum autem boni aliquid operatur deus in emendatione maiorum, cum paruulorum suorum, qui eis cari sunt, doloribus ac mortibus flagellantur, cur ista non fiant, quando, cum transierint, pro non factis erunt, in quibus facta sunt, propter quos autem facta sunt, aut meliores erunt, si temporalibus incommodis emendati rectius elegerint uiuere, aut excusationem in futuri iudicii supplicio non habebunt, si uitae huius angoribus ad aeternam uitam desiderium conuertere noluerint? quis autem nouit, quid paruulis, de quorum cruciatibus duritia maiorum contunditur aut exercetur fides aut misericordia probatur, quis ergo nouit, quid ipsis paruulis in secreto iudiciorum suorum bonae compensationis reseruet deus, quoniam, quamquam nihil recte fecerint, tamen nec peccantes aliquid ista perpessi sunt? non enim frustra etiam infantes illos, qui, cum dominus Iesus Christus necandus ab Herode quaereretur, occisi sunt, in honorem martyrum receptos commendat ecclesia.

### English translation (Claude)

I for my part said something, not about talents but at least about the punishments of little ones which they suffer in this life, in those books on free will. What it is, and why it does not satisfy me in this question which we have in hand, I shall explain, and I shall insert in this letter that very passage excerpted from the third book. For it runs thus: "As for the bodily torments by which little ones are afflicted, who because of their age have no sins, if the souls by which they are animated did not exist before they themselves began to be human beings, a greater and as it were merciful complaint is usually made, when it is said: 'What evil have they done, to suffer these things?' As if there could be a merit of innocence before anyone could do any harm! But when God works some good in the correction of adults, when they are scourged by the pains and deaths of their little ones who are dear to them, why should these things not happen, since, when they have passed, they will be as if they had not happened for those in whom they happened, while those for whose sake they happened will either be better, if, corrected by temporal troubles, they choose to live more rightly, or will have no excuse in the punishment of the judgment to come, if they refuse to turn their desire to eternal life from the anguish of this life? And who knows what God reserves, in the secret of his judgments, by way of good compensation for the little ones themselves, by whose torments the hardness of adults is crushed, or faith exercised, or mercy tested; who, then, knows what he reserves for the little ones themselves, since, although they have done nothing rightly, neither have they suffered these things for any sin? For not in vain does the church commend as received into the honor of martyrs even those infants who were killed when the Lord Jesus Christ was sought by Herod to be put to death."

### Scripture references

- Matt 2:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine, On Free Will 3.23.68. Scripture: Matt 2:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.18 (CSEL 44:571–573; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-18).

## Letter 166.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-19
- Source: CSEL 44:573–574
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In On Free Will Augustine's aim allowed him to leave the four opinions open, but now, seeking the true one, he finds his earlier defense inadequate.

### Latin text

Haec tunc dixi, cum hanc ipsam, de qua nunc agitur, uellem communire sententiam. sicut enim paulo ante commemoraui, quaecumque illarum de animae incarnatione quattuor opinionum uera esset, inculpatam substantiam creatoris et a nostrorum peccatorum societate remotissimam nitebar ostendere. et ideo, quaecumque illarum ueritate posset conuinci et repudiari, ad curam intentionis meae, quam tunc habebam, non pertinebat, quando quidem cunctis diligentiore disputatione discussis, quaecumque illarum recte uinceret ceteras, me securissimo fieret, quando etiam secundum omnes id, quod agebam, inuictum persistere demonstrabam. nunc uero unam uolo, si possim, rationem rectam eligere ex omnibus et propterea huius ipsius, de qua nunc agimus, defensionem in his, quae commemoraui de illo libro, uerbis meis attentius intuens ualidam firmamque non uideo.

### English translation (Claude)

I said these things then when I wished to fortify this very opinion which is now in question. For, as I mentioned a little before, I was striving to show that, whichever of those four opinions about the incarnation of the soul was true, the substance of the Creator is blameless and most remote from any share in our sins. And therefore it did not concern the purpose I then had which of them could be refuted by the truth and rejected, since, when all had been examined by more careful discussion, whichever of them rightly prevailed over the rest, it would happen with me fully secure, as I was showing that what I was arguing remained unconquered according to all of them. But now I wish, if I can, to choose the one right account out of all of them; and therefore, looking more attentively at my words which I have quoted from that book, I do not see that the defense of this very opinion which we are now discussing is strong and firm.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.19 (CSEL 44:573–574; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-19).

## Letter 166.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-20
- Source: CSEL 44:574–575
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Compensation may apply to infants who suffer for Christ or are baptized, but not to unbaptized infants who die after suffering and are condemned.

### Latin text

Nam uelut firmamentum eius illud est, quod ibi dixi: Quis autem nouit, quid paruulis, de quorum cruciatibus duritia maiorum contunditur aut exercetur fides aut misericordia probatur, quis ergo nouit, quid ipsis paruulis in secreto iudiciorum suorum bonae compensationis reseruet deus? sed hoc non inmerito dici uideo de his, qui uel pro Christi nomine ac uera religione tale aliquid etiam nescientes patiuntur uel sacramento Christi iam inbuti sunt, quia sine societate unius mediatoris liberari a damnatione non possunt, ut possit eis etiam pro illis malis, quae hic in diuersis afflictionibus pertulerunt, compensatio illa praestari. nunc autem, cum ista quaestio non possit absolui, nisi etiam de his paruulis respondeatur, qui post grauissimos cruciatus sine sacramento Christianae societatis expirant, quae circa eos compensatio cogitanda est, quibus insuper et damnatio praeparata est? nam et de baptismo paruulorum in eodem libro non quidem sufficienter, sed quantum illi operi satis esse uidebatur, utcumque respondi, quod etiam nescientibus et fidem suam nondum habentibus prodest, non tamen de damnatione eorum paruulorum, qui sine illo ex hac uita emigrant, tunc aliquid dicendum putaui, quia non, quod nunc agitur, agebatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For its main support, as it were, is what I said there: "And who knows what God reserves, in the secret of his judgments, by way of good compensation for the little ones themselves, by whose torments the hardness of adults is crushed, or faith exercised, or mercy tested?" But I see that this is not unreasonably said of those who either suffer something of the kind for Christ's name and the true religion, even without knowing it, or have already been initiated in the sacrament of Christ; because without fellowship with the one mediator they cannot be freed from condemnation, so that that compensation can be given to them even for the evils which they have endured here in various afflictions. But now, since this question cannot be settled unless an answer is given also concerning those little ones who, after the most grievous torments, expire without the sacrament of Christian fellowship, what compensation is to be thought of for them, for whom, besides, condemnation too is prepared? For in the same book I also answered somehow about the baptism of little ones, not sufficiently, but as much as seemed enough for that work, that it benefits them even though they do not know it and do not yet have faith of their own; but about the condemnation of those little ones who depart this life without it I did not then think anything needed to be said, because what is now in question was not then in question.

### Translation notes

- Augustine, On Free Will 3.23.67. His teaching on unbaptized infants is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.20 (CSEL 44:574–575; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-20).

## Letter 166.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-21
- Source: CSEL 44:575–577
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since all die in Adam and are made alive only in Christ, unbaptized infants are condemned, as the church's practice and Jerome himself affirm; but Augustine cannot see why, if their souls are sinless.

### Latin text

Sed ut omittamus et contemnamus ea, quae breui tempore patiuntur nec transacta reuocantur, numquid similiter contemnere possumus, quod per unum hominem mors et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum? sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. per hanc enim apostolicam diuinam claramque sententiam satis euidenter elucet neminem ire in mortem nisi per Adam, neminem in uitam aeternam nisi per Christum. hoc est quippe omnes) et omnes, quia sicut omnes homines per primam, hoc est per carnalem generationem pertinent ad Adam, sic omnes homines ad secundam, id est spiritalem generationem ueniunt, quicumque ad Christum perueniunt. ideo ergo dictum est et hic omnes) et ibi omnes, quia sicut omnes, qui moriuntur, non nisi in Adam moriuntur, ita omnes, qui uiuificabuntur, non nisi in Christo uiuificabuntur. ac per hoc quisquis nobis dixerit quemquam resurrectione mortuorum uiuificari nisi in Christo, tamquam pestis communis fidei detestandus est. item quisquis dixerit, quod in Christo uiuificabuntur etiam paruuli, qui sine sacramenti eius participatione de uita exeunt, hic profecto et contra apostoli praedicationem uenit et totam condemnat ecclesiam, ubi propterea cum baptizandis paruulis festinatur et curritur, quia sine dubio creditur aliter eos in Christo uiuificari omnino non posse. qui autem non uiuificantur in Christo, restat, ut in ea condemnatione maneant, de qua dicit apostolus: Per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem. cui delicto obnoxios paruulos nasci et omnis credit ecclesia et ipse iam contra Iouinianum disputans et exponens Ionam prophetam, sicut paulo ante commemoraui, fide ueracissima definisti, credo et in aliis locis opusculorum tuorum, quae uel non legi uel in praesentia non recordor. huius igitur damnationis in paruulos causam requiro, quia neque animarum, si nouae fiunt singulis singulae, uideo esse ullum in illa aetate peccatum nec a deo damnari aliquam credo, quam uidet nullum habere peccatum.

### English translation (Claude)

But let us pass over and disregard what they suffer for a short time and what, once past, is not recalled: can we likewise disregard that "through one man came death, and through one man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all shall be made alive"? For through this apostolic, divine, and clear statement it shines out quite evidently that no one goes into death except through Adam, no one into eternal life except through Christ. For this is what "all" and "all" mean: that as all human beings belong to Adam by the first, that is, the fleshly generation, so all human beings who come to Christ come to the second, that is, the spiritual generation. Therefore "all" was said both here and there, because, as all who die die only in Adam, so all who will be made alive will be made alive only in Christ. And therefore whoever tells us that anyone is made alive in the resurrection of the dead except in Christ must be detested as a plague on the common faith. Likewise, whoever says that little ones too, who depart this life without participation in his sacrament, will be made alive in Christ, certainly both opposes the apostle's preaching and condemns the whole church, where people hasten and run with little ones to be baptized precisely because it is believed without doubt that otherwise they cannot be made alive in Christ at all. And those who are not made alive in Christ must remain in that condemnation of which the apostle says: "Through the offense of one upon all men to condemnation." That little ones are born liable to this offense the whole church believes, and you yourself, disputing against Jovinian and expounding the prophet Jonah, as I mentioned a little before, have defined it with most truthful faith, and I believe also in other places of your works which I have either not read or do not recall at present. I seek, then, the cause of this condemnation in little ones, because, if souls are made new, each for each, I see no sin in them at that age, nor do I believe that God condemns any soul which he sees has no sin.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: 1 Cor 15:21–22; Rom 5:18. Translated exactly as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.21 (CSEL 44:575–577; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-21).

## Letter 166.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-22
- Source: CSEL 44:577–578
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine considers a hypothesis that only the infant's flesh is sinful, so that an unbaptized infant's soul would be saved but its body would not rise in Christ.

### Latin text

An forte dicendum est in paruulo carnem solam esse peccati, nouam uero illi animam fieri, qua secundum dei praecepta uiuente in adiutorio gratiae Christi et ipsi carni edomitae ac subiugatae possit incorruptionis meritum comparari? sed quia in paruulo anima nondum id agere potest, si Christi acceperit sacramentum, per hanc gratiam carni eius adquiritur, quod illius moribus nondum potuit, si autem sine illo sacramento anima paruuli exierit, ipsa quidem in aeterna uita erit, unde eam nullum peccatum potuit separare, caro uero eius non resurget in Christo non percepto ante mortem illius sacramento?

### English translation (Claude)

Or should it perhaps be said that in a little one only the flesh is of sin, but a new soul is made for it, so that, if the soul lives according to God's commands with the help of the grace of Christ, the merit of incorruption can be obtained even for the flesh, tamed and subjugated? But since in a little one the soul cannot yet do this, if it receives the sacrament of Christ, then by this grace there is acquired for its flesh what could not yet be acquired by its conduct; but if the little one's soul departs without that sacrament, it will itself be in eternal life, from which no sin could separate it, but its flesh will not rise in Christ, since it did not receive his sacrament before death?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.22 (CSEL 44:577–578; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-22).

## Letter 166.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-23
- Source: CSEL 44:578–579
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the hypothesis, since Scripture knows only the resurrection of life and of judgment, and the church baptizes infants for their souls, as Cyprian taught.

### Latin text

Hanc opinionem numquam audiui, numquam legi, sed plane audiui et credidi, propter quod et locutus sum, quia ueniet hora, quando omnes, qui sunt in monumentis, audient uocem eius et procedent, qui bona fecerunt, in resurrectionem uitae; ipsa est, de qua dicitur: Et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum, ipsa est, qua in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur, qui autem male egerunt, in resurrectionem iudicii. quid hic ergo de illis infantibus intellegendum est, qui priusquam possent agere uel bene uel male, sine baptismo corpore exuti sunt? nihil hic de talibus dictum est. sed si caro eorum ideo non resurget, quia nec boni aliquid egerunt nec mali, nec illorum resurrectura est, qui percepta baptismi gratia in illa aetate defuncti sunt, in qua nihil bene uel male agere potuerunt. si autem illi inter sanctos resurgent, id est inter eos, qui bene egerunt, inter quos et illi resurrecturi, sunt nisi inter eos, qui male egerunt, ne aliquas humanas animas credamus corpora sua non recepturas siue in resurrectionem uitae siue in resurrectionem iudicii? quae sententia, priusquam refellatur, ipsa nouitate iam displicet. deinde quis ferat, si credant se illi, qui ad baptismum cum suis paruulis currunt, propter carnes eorum non propter animas currere? beatus quidem Cyprianus non aliquod decretum condens nouum sed ecclesiae fidem firmissimam seruans ad corrigendos eos, qui putabant ante octauum diem natiuitatis non esse paruulum baptizandum, non carnem sed animam dixit non esse perdendam et mox natum rite baptizari posse cum suis quibusdam coepiscopis censuit.

### English translation (Claude)

This opinion I have never heard, never read; but I have certainly heard and believed, and therefore I have spoken, that "the hour will come when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and will come forth, those who have done good to the resurrection of life"; this is the one of which it is said, "and through one man the resurrection of the dead"; this is the one in which all will be made alive in Christ; "but those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment." What, then, is to be understood here about those infants who, before they could do either good or evil, were stripped of the body without baptism? Nothing is said here about such. But if their flesh will not rise because they did neither good nor evil, neither will the flesh of those rise who received the grace of baptism and died at an age at which they could do neither good nor evil. But if the latter will rise among the saints, that is, among those who did good, among whom will the former rise but among those who did evil, unless we are to believe that some human souls will not receive their bodies back, either to the resurrection of life or to the resurrection of judgment? This opinion, even before it is refuted, already displeases by its very novelty. Besides, who could bear it if those who run to baptism with their little ones believed that they are running for the sake of their flesh and not their souls? Blessed Cyprian, indeed, establishing no new decree but preserving the most firm faith of the church, in order to correct those who thought that a little one should not be baptized before the eighth day after birth, said that it is not the flesh but the soul that must not be lost, and with some of his fellow bishops judged that a child can rightly be baptized as soon as it is born.

### Scripture references

- Ps 116:10 (115:10 Vulg.): allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:13: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:28: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 64.2 (Letters): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Ps 116:10 (115:10 Vulgate; 2 Cor 4:13); John 5:28–29; 1 Cor 15:21–22. Cyprian, Ep. 64 (to Fidus) 2–6, in Hartel's numbering.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.23 (CSEL 44:578–579; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-23).

## Letter 166.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-24
- Source: CSEL 44:579–580
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever one thinks of Cyprian on other points, no one may oppose the apostolic faith in original sin or the church's custom of infant baptism, which is not for the body.

### Latin text

Sed contra Cypriani aliquam opinionem, ubi, quod uidendum fuit, fortasse non uidit, sentiat quisque, quod libet; tantum contra apostolicam manifestissimam fidem nemo sentiat, qui ex unius delicto omnes in condemnationem duci praedicat. ex qua condemnatione non liberat nisi gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, in quo uno omnes uiuificantur, quicumque uiuificantur; contra ecclesiae fundatissimum morem nemo sentiat, ubi ad baptismum si propter paruulorum sola corpora curreretur, baptizandi offerrentur et mortui.

### English translation (Claude)

But against some opinion of Cyprian's, where perhaps he did not see what should have been seen, let each think what he likes; only let no one think against the most manifest apostolic faith, which preaches that from the offense of one all are led into condemnation, from which condemnation nothing frees but the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, in whom alone all are made alive who are made alive; let no one think against the most firmly founded custom of the church, in which, if people ran to baptism only for the sake of the bodies of little ones, even the dead would be offered for baptism.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:18: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- "Some opinion of Cyprian's": probably his view on rebaptism of heretics. Scripture: Rom 5:18; Rom 7:25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.24 (CSEL 44:579–580; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-24).

## Letter 166.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-25
- Source: CSEL 44:580
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine will adopt the creation of new souls only if it can be reconciled with the condemnation of unbaptized infants.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, quaerenda causa atque reddenda est, quare damnentur animae, quae nouae creantur singulis quibusque nascentibus, si praeter Christi sacramentum paruuli moriantur. damnari enim eas, si sic de corpore exierint, et sancta scriptura et sancta est testis ecclesia. unde illa de animarum nouarum creatione sententia, si hanc fidem fundatissimam non oppugnat, sit et mea, si oppugnat, non sit et tua.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, the cause must be sought and given why souls which are newly created for each person born are condemned, if the little ones die without the sacrament of Christ. For that they are condemned if they go out of the body in this way, both holy Scripture and the holy church are witnesses. Hence that opinion about the creation of new souls, if it does not attack this most firmly founded faith, let it be mine too; if it does attack it, let it not be yours either.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.25 (CSEL 44:580; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-25).

## Letter 166.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-26
- Source: CSEL 44:580–582
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Texts like Zech 12:1, Ps 33:15, and Eccl 12:7 do not settle the question in favor of new souls; Augustine wishes the view to be true and asks Jerome for an unanswerable defense.

### Latin text

Nolo mihi dicatur pro hac sententia debere accipi, quod scriptum est: Qui finxit spiritum hominis in ipso et: Qui finxit singillatim corda eorum. aliquid fortissimum atque inuictissimum requirendum est, quod nos non cogat deum credere ullarum animarum sine culpa aliqua damnatorem. nam uel tantundem ualet uel plus est forsitan creare quam fingere et tamen scriptum est: Cor mundum crea in me, deus. nec ideo putari potest anima hoc loco optare se fieri, priusquam aliquid esset. sicut ergo iam existens creatur innouatione iustitiae, sic iam existens fingitur conformatione doctrinae. nec illud, quod in ecclesiaste scriptum est: Tunc conuertetur in terram puluis, sicut fuit, et spiritus reuertetur ad dominum, qui dedit illum, istam confirmat sententiam, quam esse uolumus nostram; plus enim hoc suffragatur eis, qui ex una putant omnes esse animas. nam sicut conuertitur, inquiunt, puluis in terram, sicut fuit, et tamen caro, de qua hoc dictum est, ad hominem non reuertitur, ex quo propagata est, sed ad terram, unde primus homo factus est, sic et spiritus ex illius unius spiritu propagatus non tamen ad eum reuertitur sed ad dominum, a quo illi datus est. uerum quia hoc testimonium ita pro istis sonat, ut non omni modo huic opinioni, quam defendi uolo, uideatur esse contrarium, admonendam tantum credidi prudentiam tuam, ne talibus testimoniis ex his angustiis me coneris eruere. nam licet nemo faciat optando, ut uerum sit, quod uerum non est, tamen, si fieri posset, optarem, ut haec sententia uera esset, sicut opto, ut, si uera est, abs te liquidissime atque inuictissime defendatur.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not want to be told that in support of this opinion we should take what is written: "Who formed the spirit of man within him," and "Who fashioned their hearts one by one." Something most strong and unconquerable must be sought, which does not compel us to believe that God condemns any souls without any fault. For to create is as much as, or perhaps more than, to form; and yet it is written, "Create a clean heart in me, O God"; and it cannot be thought on that account that the soul in this passage wishes to be made before it was anything at all. Just as, then, an already existing soul is created by the renewal of righteousness, so an already existing one is formed by the shaping of instruction. Nor does what is written in Ecclesiastes, "Then the dust shall return to the earth as it was, and the spirit shall return to the Lord who gave it," confirm this opinion which we wish to be ours; for it rather supports those who think that all souls come from one. For, they say, just as the dust returns to the earth as it was, and yet the flesh of which this was said does not return to the man from whom it was propagated but to the earth from which the first man was made, so too the spirit, propagated from the spirit of that one man, does not return to him but to the Lord, by whom it was given to him. But since this testimony sounds in favor of these people in such a way that it does not seem altogether contrary to this opinion which I wish defended, I thought I should only advise your Prudence not to try to rescue me from these straits with such testimonies. For although no one, by wishing, makes true what is not true, yet, if it were possible, I would wish this opinion to be true, as I wish that, if it is true, it may be defended by you most clearly and unanswerably.

### Scripture references

- Zech 12:1: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 33:15 (32:15 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:10 (50:12 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 12:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Zech 12:1; Ps 33:15 (32:15 Vulgate); Ps 51:10 (50:12 Vulgate); Eccl 12:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.26 (CSEL 44:580–582; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-26).

## Letter 166.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-27
- Source: CSEL 44:582–584
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The same difficulty faces the view that pre-existing souls are sent into bodies; Augustine rejects the Origenist view of souls imprisoned for earlier sins and of endless cycles.

### Latin text

Haec autem difficultas etiam illos sequitur, qui iam existentes alibi animas et ab initio diuinorum operum praeparatas a deo mitti opinantur in corpora. nam et ab his hoc idem quaeritur: si animae inculpatae oboedienter ueniunt, quo mittuntur, cur in paruulis, si non baptizati uitam istam finierint, puniuntur? eadem prorsus in utraque sententia difficultas est. illi sibi uidentur de hac facilius exire quaestione, qui animas adseuerant pro meritis uitae prioris singulas singulis corporibus implicari. hoc enim putant esse in Adam mori, in carne scilicet, quae propagata est ex Adam, supplicia pendere, a quo reatu, inquiunt, gratia Christi liberat pusillos cum magnis. hoc quidem recte, ueraciter, optime, quod gratia Christi liberat a reatu peccatorum pusillos cum magnis. sed in alia superiore uita peccare animas et inde praecipitari in carceres carneos non credo, non adquiesco, non consentio: primo quoniam per nescio quos circuitus id agunt isti, ut post nescio quanta uolumina saeculorum iterum ad istam sarcinam corruptibilis carnis et supplicia pendenda redeundum sit, qua opinione quid horribilius cogitari possit, ignoro; deinde quis tandem iustus defunctus est, de quo non, si isti uera dicunt, solliciti esse debeamus, ne in sinu Abrahae peccans in flammas illius diuitis deiciatur? cur enim non et post hoc corpus peccari possit, si et ante potuit? postremo longe aliud est in Adam peccasse, unde dicit apostolus: In quo omnes peccauerunt, et aliud est extra Adam nescio ubi peccasse et ideo in Adam, id est in carnem, quae ex Adam propagata est, tamquam in carcerem trudi. illam uero opinionem, quod ex una fiant omnes animae, nec discutere uolo, nisi necesse sit, atque utinam ista, de qua nunc agimus, si uera est, sic abs te defendatur, ut hoc necesse iam non sit.

### English translation (Claude)

This difficulty also follows those who think that souls already existing elsewhere and prepared from the beginning of the divine works are sent by God into bodies. For of them too the same is asked: if blameless souls come obediently where they are sent, why are they punished in little ones if these end this life unbaptized? The difficulty is exactly the same in both opinions. Those think they escape this question more easily who assert that souls are entangled, one in each body, according to the merits of a former life. For they think that this is what it is to die in Adam: to pay penalties in the flesh, namely, which was propagated from Adam; and from this guilt, they say, the grace of Christ frees the small with the great. This indeed is right, true, and excellent: that the grace of Christ frees the small with the great from the guilt of sins. But that souls sin in another, previous life and are thrown down from there into fleshly prisons I do not believe, I do not accept, I do not agree: first, because these people bring it about, by I know not what cycles, that after I know not how many ages one must return again to this burden of corruptible flesh and to pay penalties, than which opinion I do not know what more horrible could be thought; next, what righteous person, after all, has died about whom, if these people speak the truth, we ought not to be anxious that, sinning in Abraham's bosom, he may be cast into the flames of that rich man? For why could one not sin after this body, if one could before it? Finally, it is one thing to have sinned in Adam (whence the apostle says, "in whom all sinned"), and another to have sinned outside Adam, I know not where, and therefore to be thrust into Adam, that is, into the flesh propagated from Adam, as into a prison. As for that opinion that all souls are made from one, I do not wish even to discuss it unless it is necessary; and I wish that the one we are now discussing, if it is true, may be so defended by you that this is no longer necessary.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:22: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 16:24: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Luke 16:22–24; Rom 5:12 (Old Latin "in quo omnes peccauerunt"). The view of souls punished for sins in a previous life is associated with Origen.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.27 (CSEL 44:582–584; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-27).

## Letter 166.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-28
- Source: CSEL 44:584–586
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine hopes Jerome can resolve the question but will accept ignorance with patience, holding only that the true view cannot contradict the faith that infants are saved only through Christ's grace in the sacraments.

### Latin text

Quamuis autem desiderem, rogem, uotis ardentibus exoptem et expectem, ut per te mihi dominus huius rei auferat ignorantiam, tamen, si, quod absit, minime meruero, patientiam mihi petam a domino deo nostro, in quem sic credimus, ut aliqua nobis non aperiri etiam pulsantibus nullo modo aduersus eum murmurare debeamus. meminerimus ipsis apostolis dictum: Multa habeo uobis dicere, sed non potestis illa portare modo. in his, quantum ad me adtinet, etiam hoc deputem nec, qui hoc sciam, me indigner indignum, ne hoc ipso etiam conuincar indignior. multa enim alia similiter nescio, quae commemorare uel numerare non possum; et hoc tolerabiliter ignorarem, nisi metuerem, ne aliqua istarum opinionum contra illud, quod firmissima retinemus fide, incautis obreperet mentibus. sed antequam sciam, quaenam earum potius eligenda sit, hoc me non temere sentire profiteor, eam, quae uera est, non aduersari robustissimae ac fundatissimae fidei, qua Christi ecclesia nec paruulos homines recentissime natos a damnatione credit nisi per gratiam nominis Christi, quam in suis sacramentis commendauit, posse liberari.

### English translation (Claude)

But although I desire, ask, long for with ardent prayers, and await that the Lord may take away my ignorance of this matter through you, yet if (God forbid) I do not deserve it, I shall ask patience from the Lord our God, in whom we so believe that, if some things are not opened to us even when we knock, we ought in no way to murmur against him. Let us remember that it was said to the apostles themselves: "I have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now." Among these, as far as I am concerned, let me count this too, and not be indignant that I am unworthy to know it, lest by this very fact I be shown still more unworthy. For there are many other things which I likewise do not know, which I cannot mention or count; and I would bear my ignorance of this patiently, did I not fear that one of these opinions might creep into incautious minds against what we hold with most firm faith. But before I know which of them should rather be chosen, I profess that I hold this not rashly: that the one which is true does not oppose the most robust and most firmly founded faith, by which the church of Christ believes that not even newborn human infants can be freed from condemnation except through the grace of the name of Christ, which he has commended in his sacraments.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: allusion, medium confidence
- John 16:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Scripture: Matt 7:7 (knocking); John 16:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 166.28 (CSEL 44:584–586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/166-18/#p-166-28).

## Letter 167.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-1
- Source: CSEL 44:586–587
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to explain James 2:10, “whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all.”

### Latin text

Quod ad te scripsi, honorande mihi in Christo frater Hieronyme, quaerens de anima humana, si nascentibus singulis nouae singulae nunc usque fiunt, ubi peccati uinculum contrahant, quod per sacramentum gratiae Christi etiam in infantibus recens natis non dubitamus esse soluendum, cum in non paruum uolumen procederet, nolui ulla alia onerare quaestione. sed quod urguet acrius, multo minus est neglegendum. proinde quaero et per dominum obsecro, ut exponas mihi, quod multis existimo profuturum, aut, si iam uel abs te uel ab aliquo expositum habes, dirigas nobis, quo modo accipiendum sit, quod in epistula Iacobi apostoli est: Quicumque enim totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus. quae res talis ac tanta est, ut, quod hinc tibi non iam olim scripsi, me multum paeniteat.

### English translation (Claude)

When I wrote to you, Jerome, my brother honored in Christ, asking about the human soul (if new souls are still being made, one for each person born, where do they contract the bond of sin, which we do not doubt must be loosed through the sacrament of Christ's grace even in newborn infants?), the letter grew into no small volume, and I did not wish to burden it with any other question. But a matter that presses more sharply must be neglected far less. So I ask you, and I implore you by the Lord, to explain to me, as I think will profit many, or, if you already have it explained either by yourself or by someone else, to send us the explanation of how we are to understand what is in the letter of the apostle James: “For whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all.” This matter is of such kind and weight that I very much regret not having written to you about it long ago.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's earlier letter to Jerome on the origin of the soul is Ep. 166.
- Quotation: Jas 2:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.1 (CSEL 44:586–587; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-1).

## Letter 167.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-2
- Source: CSEL 44:587–589
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains, with the parable of a man in a well, why the question about James matters more for life than the question of the soul's origin.

### Latin text

De agenda namque praesenti uita, quo modo ad uitam perueniamus aeternam, non de praeterita perscrutanda, quam penitus demersit obliuio, sicuti est illud, quod de anima quaerendum putaui. haec uertitur quaestio. eleganter autem dictum esse narratur, quod huic rei satis apte conuenit. cum quidam ruisset in puteum, ubi aqua tanta erat, ut eum magis exciperet, ne moreretur, quam suffocaret, ne loqueretur, accessit alius eoque uiso miserans ait: Quo modo huc cecidisti? at ille: Obsecro, inquit, quo modo hinc me liberes, non, quo modo huc ceciderim, quaere. ita, quoniam fatemur et fide catholica tenemus de reatu peccati tamquam de puteo etiam paruuli infantis animam Christi gratia liberandam, satis est ei, quod modum, quo salua fiat. nouimus, etiamsi numquam. quo modo in malum illud deuenerit, nouerimus. sed ideo putaui esse quaerendum, ne forte ex illis opinionibus incarnationis animae aliquam teneamus incautius, quae liberandam prorsus animam paruuli contradicat negans eam esse in isto malo. hoc igitur firmissime retento, quod anima paruuli de reatu peccati liberanda est nec alio modo liberanda nisi gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, si possumus etiam ipsius mali causam et originem nosse, uaniloquis non disputatoribus sed litigatoribus paratius instructiusque resistimus; si autem non possumus, non, quia latet miseriae principium, ideo pigrescere misericordiae debet officium. aduersus eos autem. qui sibi uidentur scire, quod nesciunt, hoc tutiores sumus. quod hanc ignorantiam nostram non ignoramus. aliud est enim, quod nescire malum est, aliud, quod sciri uel non potest uel non opus est uel ad uitam. quam quaerimus, indifferens est. hoc uero, quod de litteris apostoli Iacobi nunc requiro. in hac ipsa, qua uiuimus et, ut semper uiuamus, deo placere studemus, actione uersatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For this question concerns the conduct of the present life, how we may come to eternal life, not an inquiry into the past, which oblivion has buried deep, as is the question I thought should be asked about the soul. A neat story is told that fits this matter quite well. A man had fallen into a well where there was enough water to catch him, so that he did not die, but not so much as to choke him, so that he could not speak. Another came up and, seeing him, said with pity: “How did you fall in here?” And he said: “I beg you, think how to get me out of here, not how I fell in.” So, since we confess and hold by the Catholic faith that the soul even of a little infant must be freed by the grace of Christ from the guilt of sin, as from a well, it is enough for it that we know the way in which it is saved, even if we never know how it came into that evil. But I thought the question should be asked so that we might not incautiously hold one of those opinions about the soul's embodiment which would contradict the need to free the infant's soul, by denying that it is in this evil at all. Holding most firmly, then, that the infant's soul must be freed from the guilt of sin and can be freed in no other way than by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, if we can also know the cause and origin of that evil, we resist the empty talkers, who are not debaters but quarrelers, with more readiness and better equipment; but if we cannot, the work of mercy ought not to grow slack because the beginning of the misery is hidden. Against those who think they know what they do not know, we are the safer for not being ignorant of our own ignorance. For it is one thing not to know what it is bad not to know, another not to know what either cannot be known, or need not be known, or makes no difference to the life we seek. But what I now ask about the writing of the apostle James concerns the very conduct in which we live and in which we strive to please God so that we may live forever.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.2 (CSEL 44:587–589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-2).

## Letter 167.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-3
- Source: CSEL 44:589–591
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the context of James 2:1–11 and the apparent consequence that partiality to the rich makes one guilty of every crime.

### Latin text

Quo modo ergo intellegendum est, obsecro te, quicumque totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus? itane, qui furtum fecerit, immo uero qui dixerit diuiti: Hic sede, pauperi autem: Tu sta illic, et homicidii et adulterii et sacrilegii reus est? quod si non est, quo modo, qui in uno offendit, factus est omnium reus? an illud, quod dixi de diuite et paupere, ad ista non pertinet, quorum si quis in uno offenderit, fiet. omnium reus? sed recolendum est, unde uenerit ista sententia et quae illam superiora pepererint quibusque conexa dependeat. fratres mei, nolite, inquit, in personarum acceptione habere fidem domini nostri Iesu Christi gloriae. etenim si introierit in conuentu uestro uir aureum anulum habens in ueste candida, introierit autem et pauper in sordido habitu et intendatis in eum, qui indutus est ueste praeclara, et dicatis: Tu sede hic bene, pauperi autem dicatis: Tu sta illic aut: Sede sub scabello pedum meorum, nonne iudicastis apud uosmet ipsos et facti estis iudices cogitationum iniquarum? audite, fratres mei dilectissimi: nonne deus elegit pauperes in hoc mundo diuites in fide et heredes regni. quod promisit deus diligentibus se? uos autem exhonorastis pauperem. propter illum scilicet. cui dictum est: Tu sta illic. cum habenti anulum aureum dictum esset: Tu sede hic bene. ac deinde sequitur eandem ipsam sententiam latius uersans et explicans: Nonne, inquit, diuites per potentiam opprimunt uos et ipsi adtrahunt uos ad iudicia? nonne ipsi blasphemant bonum nomen, quod inuocatum est super uos? si quidem legem perficitis regalem secundum scripturas: Diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum, bene facitis; si autem personas accipitis, peccatum operamini redarguti a lege quasi transgressores. uidete, quem ad modum transgressores legis appellet, qui dicunt diuiti: Sede hic et pauperi: Sta illic. unde ne putarent contemptibile esse peccatum in hac una re legem transgredi, secutus adiunxit: Quicumque autem totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus. qui enim dixit: Non moechaberis, dixit et: Non occides. quod si non occides, moechaberis autem, factus es transgressor legis propter illud, quod dixerat: Redarguti a lege quasi transgressores. quae cum ita sint, consequens uidetur, nisi alio modo intellegendum ostendatur. ut, qui dixerit diuiti: Sede hic et pauperi: Sta illic huic honorem ampliorem quam illi deferens, et idolatres et blasphemus et adulter et homicida et, ne, quod longum est, cuncta commemorem, reus omnium criminum iudicandus sit; offendens quippe in uno factus est omnium reus.

### English translation (Claude)

How then, I beg you, is “whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all” to be understood? Is the one who has committed theft, or rather the one who has said to the rich man, “Sit here,” but to the poor man, “You stand there,” guilty of murder, adultery, and sacrilege? And if not, how has the one who stumbles in one point become guilty of all? Or does what I said about the rich man and the poor man not belong to those things in any one of which, if someone stumbles, he becomes guilty of all? But we must recall where this sentence came from, what preceding words gave birth to it, and on what it depends by connection. “My brothers,” he says, “do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ of glory with partiality. For if a man with a gold ring and in bright clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and you pay attention to the one wearing the splendid clothing and say, ‘You sit here in a good place,’ but say to the poor man, ‘You stand there,’ or, ‘Sit under my footstool,’ have you not judged among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my dearest brothers: has not God chosen the poor in this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that God promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor man”: namely the one to whom it was said, “You stand there,” when to the one with the gold ring it had been said, “You sit here in a good place.” And then he goes on, turning over and unfolding that very thought more broadly: “Do not the rich oppress you by their power, and themselves drag you into court? Do they not blaspheme the good name that has been invoked over you? If indeed you fulfill the royal law according to the Scriptures, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself,’ you do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” See how he calls those who say to the rich man, “Sit here,” and to the poor man, “Stand there,” transgressors of the law. Then, lest they think it a contemptible sin to transgress the law in this one thing, he went on to add: “But whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all. For he who said, ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ also said, ‘You shall not murder.’ If you do not murder but commit adultery, you have become a transgressor of the law,” on account of what he had said: “convicted by the law as transgressors.” Since this is so, it seems to follow, unless it is shown that it must be understood in another way, that whoever says to the rich man, “Sit here,” and to the poor man, “Stand there,” giving the one greater honor than the other, must be judged an idolater and a blasphemer and an adulterer and a murderer and, not to list everything, which would be long, guilty of all crimes; for by stumbling in one point he has become guilty of all.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:1–11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Jas 2:10; Jas 2:1–11. Jas 2:3 “Sit under my footstool” is restored from a garbled digital reading.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.3 (CSEL 44:589–591; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-3).

## Letter 167.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-4
- Source: CSEL 44:591–592
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes the philosophers' doctrine that the virtues are inseparable from the Stoic doctrine that all sins are equal, which Jerome refuted against Jovinian.

### Latin text

At enim, qui unam uirtutem habet, omnes habet et. qui unam non habet, nullam habet. hoc si uerum est, confirmatur ista sententia. sed ego eam exponi uolo, non confirmari, quae per se ipsam est apud nos omnium philosophorum auctoritatibus firmior. et illud quidem de uirtutibus et uitiis si ueraciter dicitur, non est consequens, ut propter hoc omnia peccata sint paria. nam illud de inseparabilitate uirtutum, etsi forsitan fallor, tamen, si uerum memini, quod uix memini. omnibus philosophis placuit, qui easdem uirtutes agendae uitae necessarias esse dixerunt. hoc autem de parilitate peccatorum soli Stoici ausi sunt disputare contra omnem sensum generis humani. quam eorum uanitatem in Iouiniano illo, qui in hac sententia Stoicus erat, in aucupandis autem et defensitandis uoluptatibus Epicureus, de scripturis sanctis dilucidissime conuicisti. in qua tua suauissima et praeclarissima disputatione satis euidenter apparuit non placuisse auctoribus nostris uel ipsi potius, quae per eos locuta est, ueritati omnia paria esse peccata. quo modo autem fieri possit, ut, etiam si hoc de uirtutibus uerum est, non tamen ideo cogamur fateri aequalitatem omnium peccatorum, quantum possum, adiuuante domino aperire conabor. quod si effecero, adprobabis; ubi causae defuero, tu supplebis.

### English translation (Claude)

“But,” someone says, “whoever has one virtue has all, and whoever lacks one has none.” If this is true, the sentence is confirmed. But I want it explained, not confirmed; for us it stands on its own, firmer than all the authorities of the philosophers. And even if that saying about virtues and vices is true, it does not follow that all sins are therefore equal. For the inseparability of the virtues, unless perhaps I am mistaken, was held, if I remember rightly (and I barely remember), by all the philosophers who said that the same virtues are necessary for the conduct of life. But the equality of sins only the Stoics dared to argue, against all the sense of mankind. That emptiness of theirs you refuted most clearly from the Holy Scriptures in the case of that Jovinian, who was a Stoic in this opinion but an Epicurean in hunting out and defending pleasures. In that most delightful and brilliant disputation of yours it appeared plainly enough that our authors, or rather the Truth itself that spoke through them, did not hold that all sins are equal. But how it can be that, even if this is true of the virtues, we are not therefore forced to admit the equality of all sins, I shall try to show as far as I can with the Lord's help. If I succeed, you will approve; where I fall short of the case, you will make up the lack.

### Translation notes

- The reference is to Jerome, Against Jovinian (book 2), which is not yet in the site's list of texts.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.4 (CSEL 44:591–592; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-4).

## Letter 167.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-5
- Source: CSEL 44:592–593
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The philosophers' argument for the inseparability of the four cardinal virtues.

### Latin text

Certe hinc persuadent, qui unam uirtutem habuerit, habere omnes et omnes deesse, cui una defuerit, quod prudentia nec ignaua nec iniusta nec intemperans potest esse; nam si aliquid horum fuerit, prudentia non erit. porro si prudentia tunc erit, si et fortis et iusta et temperans sit, profecto, ubi fuerit, secum habet ceteras. sic et fortitudo inprudens esse non potest uel intemperans uel iniusta; sic temperantia necesse est ut prudens, fortis et iusta sit; sic iustitia non est, si non sit prudens, fortis et temperans. ita ubi uera est aliqua earum, et aliae similiter sunt; ubi autem aliae desunt, uera illa non est, etiamsi aliquo modo similis esse uideatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Certainly they argue that whoever has one virtue has all, and that all are lacking to one who lacks one, on this ground: that prudence can be neither cowardly nor unjust nor intemperate, for if it were any of these it would not be prudence. Moreover, if it will be prudence only when it is also brave, just, and temperate, then wherever it is, it has the others with it. So too courage cannot be imprudent, or intemperate, or unjust; so temperance must be prudent, brave, and just; so justice does not exist unless it is prudent, brave, and temperate. Thus where any one of them is true, the others are likewise present; but where the others are lacking, that one is not true, even if in some way it seems similar.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.5 (CSEL 44:592–593; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-5).

## Letter 167.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-6
- Source: CSEL 44:593–594
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Each virtue has two opposing vices: one plainly contrary, one deceptively similar.

### Latin text

Sunt enim, ut scis, quaedam uitia uirtutibus aperta discretione contraria, ut inprudentia prudentiae: sunt autem quaedam tantum, quia uitia sunt, ideo contraria, quadam tamen specie fallaci similia, ut eidem prudentiae non inprudentia sed astutia. nunc enim eam dico astutiam, quae usitatius in malitiosis intellegi et uocari solet, non sicut loqui nostra scriptura consueuit, quae saepe astutiam in bono ponit, unde est: Astuti ut serpentes et illud: Ut det innocentibus astutiam. quamquam et apud illos Romanae linguae disertissimus dixerit: Neque illi tamen ad cauendum dolus aut astutia deerat astutiam ponens in bono; sed apud illos rarissimum. apud nostros autem frequentissimum est. itemque in partibus temperantiae apertissime contraria est effusio parsimoniae; ea uero, quae tenacitas etiam uulgo dici solet. uitium est quidem, tamen parsimoniae simile non natura sed fallacissima specie. item dissimilitudine manifesta contraria est iniustitia iustitiae; solet autem quasi imitari iustitiam uindicandi libido, sed uitium est. ignauia fortitudini perspicue contraria est; duritia uero distat natura, fallit similitudine. constantia pars quaedam uirtutis est; ab hac inconstantia longe abhorret et indubie contrasistit, pertinacia uero constantia dici affectat et non est, quia illa est uirtus, hoc uitium.

### English translation (Claude)

For there are, as you know, some vices opposed to virtues by an obvious difference, as imprudence to prudence; but there are others opposed only because they are vices, while resembling the virtues by a deceptive appearance, as, to the same prudence, not imprudence but cunning. I now mean by cunning what is more usually understood and so called among the malicious, not as our Scripture is accustomed to speak, which often uses cunning in a good sense; hence “cunning as serpents,” and “to give cunning to the innocent.” And yet among them too the most eloquent writer of the Roman tongue said, “Yet he did not lack guile or cunning for taking precautions,” using cunning in a good sense; but among them this is very rare, while among ours it is very frequent. Likewise, in the parts of temperance, extravagance is plainly opposed to thrift; but what is commonly called stinginess is indeed a vice, yet resembles thrift not in nature but by a most deceptive appearance. Again, injustice is opposed to justice by an evident unlikeness; but the lust for revenge usually imitates justice, as it were, yet it is a vice. Cowardice is clearly opposed to courage; but hardness differs in nature while deceiving by its likeness. Constancy is a part of virtue; inconstancy is far removed from it and undoubtedly opposed to it; but obstinacy affects to be called constancy and is not, because the one is a virtue, the other a vice.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:16: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 1:4: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 26.2 (Sallust): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 10:16; Prov 1:4. The Roman writer is Sallust, Catiline 26.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.6 (CSEL 44:593–594; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-6).

## Letter 167.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-7
- Source: CSEL 44:594–595
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Catiline's endurance was not courage but hardness, because it lacked the other virtues.

### Latin text

Ut ergo non iterum eadem commemorare necesse sit, exempli gratia ponamus aliquid, unde possint cetera intellegi. Catilina. ut de illo scripserunt, qui nosse potuerunt, frigus, sitim, famem ferre poterat eratque patiens inediae, algoris, uigiliae supra, quam cuiquam credibile est, ac per hoc suis et sibi magna praeditus fortitudine uidebatur. sed haec fortitudo prudens non erat, mala enim pro bonis eligebat, temperans non erat. corruptelis enim turpissimis foedabatur, iusta non erat, nam contra patriam coniurauerat, et ideo nec fortitudo erat, sed duritia sibi, ut stultos falleret, nomen fortitudinis inponebat. nam si fortitudo esset, non uitium sed uirtus esset; si autem uirtus esset, a ceteris uirtutibus tamquam inseparabilibus comitibus numquam relinqueretur.

### English translation (Claude)

So that I need not repeat the same things again, let us take one example from which the rest can be understood. Catiline, as those who could know him wrote of him, could bear cold, thirst, and hunger, and endured fasting, cold, and sleeplessness beyond what anyone would believe; and so to his followers and to himself he seemed endowed with great courage. But this courage was not prudent, for it chose evil instead of good; it was not temperate, for he was defiled by the foulest debaucheries; it was not just, for he had conspired against his country. And therefore it was not courage at all, but hardness, which gave itself the name of courage in order to deceive fools. For if it were courage, it would be not a vice but a virtue; and if it were a virtue, it would never be abandoned by the other virtues, its inseparable companions.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sallust, Cat. 5.3 (Sallust): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine draws on Sallust, Catiline 5.3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.7 (CSEL 44:594–595; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-7).

## Letter 167.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-8
- Source: CSEL 44:595–596
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Because each virtue faces two vices, the vices are more numerous and do not hang together as the virtues do.

### Latin text

Quapropter cum quaeritur etiam de uitiis, utrum et ipsa similiter et omnia sint. ubi unum erit, aut nulla sint, ubi unum non erit, laboriosum est id ostendere propterea. quia uni uirtuti duo uitia opponi solent, et quod aperte contrarium est et quod specie similitudinis adumbratur. unde illa Catilinae quia fortitudo non erat, quae secum uirtutes alias non habebat, facilius uidebatur; quod uero ignauia fuerit, ubi exercitatio quaslibet grauissimas molestias perpetiendi atque tolerandi supra, quam cuiquam credibile est, fuit, aegre persuaderi potest. sed forte acutius intuentibus ignauia apparet ipsa duritia, quia laborem bonorum studiorum, quibus uera adquiritur fortitudo, neglexerat. uerum tamen, quia sunt audaces, qui timidi non sunt, et rursus timidi, a quibus absit audacia, cum sit utrumque uitium, quoniam, qui uera uirtute fortis est, nec temere audet nec inconsulte timet, cogimur fateri uitia plura esse uirtutibus.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, when the question is asked about the vices too, whether they likewise are all present where one is, or none where one is not, it is hard to show, because two vices are usually set against one virtue: the one plainly contrary, and the one that is shadowed by an appearance of likeness. Hence in Catiline it was easier to see that his courage was not courage, since it did not have the other virtues with it; but that it was cowardice, where there was a practice of suffering and enduring the heaviest hardships beyond what anyone would believe, can hardly be made convincing. But perhaps to those who look more sharply that very hardness appears as cowardice, because he had neglected the labor of good studies by which true courage is acquired. Nevertheless, since there are bold men who are not timid, and again timid men who are far from boldness, while both are vices (for whoever is brave with true virtue neither dares rashly nor fears unadvisedly), we are forced to admit that the vices are more numerous than the virtues.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.8 (CSEL 44:595–596; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-8).

## Letter 167.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-9
- Source: CSEL 44:596
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Vices replace one another, but a virtue entering drives out all vices.

### Latin text

Unde aliquando uitium uitio tollitur, ut amore laudis amor pecuniae, aliquando unum cedit, ut plura succedant, uelut qui ebriosus fuit, si modicum bibere tenacitate et ambitione didicerit. possunt itaque uitia cedere etiam uitiis succedentibus, non uirtutibus, et ideo plura sunt. uirtus uero quo una ingressa fuerit, quoniam secum ceteras ducit, profecto uitia cedent omnia, quaecumque inerant; non enim omnia inerant, sed aliquando totidem aliquando plura paucioribus uel pauciora pluribus succedebant.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence sometimes one vice is removed by another, as love of money by love of praise; sometimes one gives way so that several may succeed it, as when a drunkard learns to drink moderately out of stinginess and ambition. Vices, then, can give way even to vices that succeed them, not to virtues, and so they are more numerous. But wherever one virtue enters, since it brings the others with it, all the vices that were present will surely give way; for not all were present, but sometimes an equal number, sometimes more succeeded fewer, or fewer succeeded more.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.9 (CSEL 44:596; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-9).

## Letter 167.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-10
- Source: CSEL 44:596–598
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faithful spouses have the virtue of chastity yet are not without sin, so one virtue does not bring all; even the apostles say “we all stumble in many things.”

### Latin text

Haec utrum ita se habeant, diligentius inquirendum est. non enim et ista diuina sententia est, qua dicitur: Qui unam uirtutem habuerit, omnes habet eique nulla est, cui una defuerit. sed hominibus hoc uisum est multum quidem ingeniosis, studiosis, otiosis sed tamen hominibus. ego uero nescio. quem ad modum dicam non dico uirum, a quo denominata dicitur uirtus, sed etiam mulierem, quae uiro suo seruat tori fidem, si hoc faciat propter praeceptum et promissum dei eique primitus sit fidelis, non habere pudicitiam aut eam nullam uel paruam esse uirtutem; sic et maritum, qui hoc idem seruat uxori. et tamen sunt plurimi tales, quorum sine aliquo peccato esse neminem dixerim, et utique illud qualecumque peccatum ex aliquo uitio uenit. unde pudicitia coniugalis in uiris feminisque religiosis cum procul dubio uirtus sit — non enim aut nihil aut uitium est —, non tamen secum habet omnes uirtutes. nam si omnes ibi essent, nullum esset uitium; si nullum uitium, nullum omnino peccatum; quis autem sine aliquo peccato? quis ergo sine aliquo uitio. id est fomite quodam uel quasi radice peccati, cum clamet, qui super pectus domini discumbebat: Si dixerimus, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est? neque hoc apud te diutius agendum est, sed propter alios, qui haec forte legerint, dico. nam tu quidem in eodem ipso opere splendido contra Iouinianum etiam hoc de scripturis sanctis diligenter probasti, ubi etiam ex hac ipsa epistula, cuius uerba sunt, quorum nunc intellectum requirimus, posuisti, quod scriptum est: In multis enim offendimus omnes. non enim ait offenditis, sed ait offendimus, cum Christi loqueretur apostolus, et cum hoc loco dicat: Quicumque autem totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus, ibi non in uno sed in multis nec quosdam sed omnes dixit offendere.

### English translation (Claude)

Whether these things are so must be examined more carefully. For this too is not a divine sentence, which says: “Whoever has one virtue has all, and he has none who lacks one.” It seemed so to men, very gifted, studious, and at leisure indeed, but men all the same. For my part, I do not know how I could say, I will not say of a man (from whom virtue is said to be named), but even of a woman who keeps faith with her husband's bed, if she does so because of God's command and promise and is first of all faithful to him, that she does not have chastity, or that it is no virtue or a small one; and so too of a husband who keeps the same toward his wife. And yet there are very many such people, none of whom would I say is without some sin, and that sin, whatever it is, certainly comes from some vice. Hence conjugal chastity in religious men and women, though it is without doubt a virtue (for it is not either nothing or a vice), does not have all the virtues with it. For if all were there, there would be no vice; if no vice, no sin at all; but who is without some sin? Who then is without some vice, that is, a kind of tinder or root, as it were, of sin, when he who reclined on the Lord's breast cries out: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us”? There is no need to dwell on this longer with you; I say it for the sake of others who may perhaps read this. For you, in that same splendid work against Jovinian, diligently proved this too from the Holy Scriptures, where you also cited from this very letter, whose words we are now seeking to understand, what is written: “For we all stumble in many things.” For he does not say “you stumble” but “we stumble,” though he was speaking as an apostle of Christ; and while in this passage he says, “Whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all,” there he said that not in one point but in many, and not some but all, stumble.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:25: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 John 1:8; Jas 3:2; Jas 2:10. “Reclined on the Lord's breast”: John 13:25. The work against Jovinian is Jerome's (not yet in the site's list).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.10 (CSEL 44:596–598; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-10).

## Letter 167.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-11
- Source: CSEL 44:598–599
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Love, which is piety and the fullness of the law, is the true virtue and admits of more and less.

### Latin text

Absit autem, ut quisquam fidelis existimet tot milia seruorum Christi, qui ueraciter dicunt se habere peccatum, ne se ipsos decipiant et ueritas in eis non sit, nullam habere uirtutem. cum uirtus magna sit sapientia. dixit autem homini: Ecce pietas est sapientia. absit autem, ut dicamus tot ac tantos fideles et pios homines dei non habere pietatem. quam Graeci uel εὐσέβειαν uel expressius et plenius θεοσέβειαν uocant. quid autem est pietas nisi dei cultus? et unde ille colitur nisi caritate? caritas enim de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta magna et uera uirtus est, quia ipsa est et finis praecepti. merito dicta est fortis sicut mors, siue quia nemo eam uincit sicut mortem siue quia in hac uita usque ad mortem est mensura caritatis, sicut dominus ait: Maiorem hac caritatem nemo habet, quam ut animam suam quis ponat pro amicis suis, siue potius quia, sicut mors animam auellit a sensibus carnis, sic caritas a concupiscentiis carnalibus. huic subseruit scientia, cum est utilis; nam sine illa inflat; quod uero illa aedificando impleuerit, nihil ibi ista inane, quod inflet, inueniet. utilem porro scientiam definiendo monstrauit, ubi. cum dixisset: Ecce pietas est sapientia, continuo subiunxit: Abstinere uero a malis scientia est. cur ergo non dicimus, qui hanc uirtutem habet, habere omnes, cum plenitudo legis sit caritas? an quanto magis est in homine, tanto magis est uirtute praeditus, quanto autem minus. tanto minus inest uirtus, quia ipsa est uirtus, et quanto minus inest uirtus, tanto magis est uitium? ubi ergo illa plena et perfecta fuerit, nihil ex uitio remanebit.

### English translation (Claude)

God forbid that any believer should think that so many thousands of Christ's servants, who truthfully say that they have sin, lest they deceive themselves and the truth not be in them, have no virtue, since wisdom is a great virtue. And he said to man: “Behold, piety is wisdom.” God forbid, then, that we should say that so many and such great faithful and godly men of God do not have piety, which the Greeks call either eusebeia or, more expressly and fully, theosebeia. And what is piety but the worship of God? And how is he worshiped except by love? For love from a pure heart and a good conscience and sincere faith is a great and true virtue, because it is also “the end of the commandment.” It is rightly said to be “strong as death,” either because no one overcomes it, just as no one overcomes death, or because in this life the measure of love reaches to death, as the Lord says, “Greater love than this no one has, that someone lay down his life for his friends,” or rather because, as death tears the soul from the senses of the flesh, so love tears it from fleshly desires. Knowledge serves it when knowledge is useful; for without love it puffs up; but where love has filled by building up, knowledge will find nothing empty there to puff up. He showed what useful knowledge is by defining it, when, having said, “Behold, piety is wisdom,” he at once added, “but to abstain from evil is knowledge.” Why then do we not say that whoever has this virtue has all, since love is the fullness of the law? Or is it that the more of it there is in a person, the more he is endowed with virtue, and the less there is, the less virtue is in him, because it is itself virtue; and the less virtue is in him, the more vice there is? Where, then, it is full and perfect, nothing of vice will remain.

### Scripture references

- Job 28:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Song 8:6: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:1: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Job 28:28 (Latin from the Greek, “piety is wisdom”); 1 Tim 1:5; Song 8:6; John 15:13; 1 Cor 8:1; Rom 13:10; also 1 John 1:8. The Greek words are restored from a garbled digital reading (εὐσέβειαν, θεοσέβειαν).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.11 (CSEL 44:598–599; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-11).

## Letter 167.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-12
- Source: CSEL 44:599–600
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the Stoic image of the sage emerging suddenly from water into air.

### Latin text

Proinde mihi uidentur Stoici ideo falli, quia proficientem hominem in sapientia nolunt omnino habere sapientiam, sed tunc habere. cum in ea fuerit omnino perfectus, non quia illum prouectum negant, sed, nisi ex profundo quodam emergendo repente emicet in auras sapientiae liberas, nulla ex parte esse sapientem. sicut enim nihil interest ad hominem praefocandum, utrum aquam stadiis multis super se habeat altam an unum. palmum uel digitum, sic illos, qui tendunt ad sapientiam. proficere quidem dicunt tamquam ab imo gurgitis surgentes in aerem, sed, nisi totam stultitiam uelut opprimentem aquam proficiendo uelut emergendo euaserint, non habere uirtutem nec esse sapientes; ubi autem euaserint, mox habere totam nec quicquam stultitiae remanere, unde omnino ullum peccatum possit existere.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence the Stoics seem to me to be mistaken in that they refuse to allow that a man making progress in wisdom has any wisdom at all, but say he has it only when he has become entirely perfect in it. They do not deny his progress, but say that unless he suddenly shoots up, as if emerging from some depth, into the free air of wisdom, he is in no part wise. For just as it makes no difference to the drowning of a man whether he has water many furlongs deep above him or only a hand's breadth or a finger's, so they say that those who are striving toward wisdom do make progress, like men rising from the bottom of a whirlpool toward the air; but unless by progress, as by emerging, they escape the whole of folly, like water pressing them down, they have no virtue and are not wise; but once they have escaped, they at once have it whole, and nothing of folly remains from which any sin at all could arise.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.12 (CSEL 44:599–600; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-12).

## Letter 167.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-13
- Source: CSEL 44:600–601
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Progress in virtue is like gradually coming out of a cave into light: the righteous live by faith, yet no one here lives without sin.

### Latin text

Haec similitudo, ubi stultitia uelut aqua et sapientia uelut aer ponitur, ut animus a praefocatione stultitiae tamquam emergens in sapientiam repente respiret, non mihi uidetur satis accommodata nostrarum scripturarum auctoritati, sed illa potius, ut uitium uel stultitia tenebris, luci autem uirtus uel sapientia comparetur, quantum ista similia de corporalibus ad intellegibilia duci possunt. non itaque sicut de aquis in aerem surgens. ubi earum summum transierit, repente. quantum sufficit, inspiratur, sed sicut de tenebris in lucem procedens paulatim progrediendo inluminatur. quod donec plenissime fiat, iam eum tamen dicimus tamquam de abditissima spelunca egredientem uicinia lucis afflatum tanto magis, quanto magis propinquat egressui, ut illud, quod in eo lucet, sit utique ex lumine, quo progreditur, illud autem, quod adhuc obscurum est, sit ex tenebris, unde egreditur. itaque et non iustificabitur in conspectu dei omnis uiuens et tamen iustus ex fide uiuit. et induti sunt sancti iustitia alius magis alius minus et nemo hic uiuit sine peccato et hoc alius magis alius minus; optimus autem est, qui minimum.

### English translation (Claude)

This comparison, in which folly is set as water and wisdom as air, so that the mind, as if emerging from the drowning of folly into wisdom, suddenly breathes, does not seem to me well suited to the authority of our Scriptures. Better is the comparison in which vice or folly is likened to darkness, and virtue or wisdom to light, so far as such likenesses can be carried over from bodily things to intelligible ones. So a person does not, like one rising from the water into the air, suddenly breathe in as much as suffices once he has passed its surface; rather, like one going out of darkness into light, he is enlightened gradually as he advances. Until this is fully accomplished, we nevertheless say that he is like one coming out of a very deep cave, touched by the nearness of the light the more, the nearer he comes to the exit; so that what shines in him comes from the light toward which he advances, and what is still dark comes from the darkness out of which he is coming. And so “no one living will be justified in God's sight,” and yet “the righteous lives by faith”; the saints are clothed with righteousness, one more, another less; and no one here lives without sin, and this too one more, another less; and the best is he who sins least.

### Scripture references

- Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Hab 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 132:9 (131:9 LXX): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX/Vulgate); Hab 2:4 (cf. Rom 1:17). “Clothed with righteousness”: Job 29:14 or Ps 132:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.13 (CSEL 44:600–601; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-13).

## Letter 167.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-14
- Source: CSEL 44:601–602
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even if the virtues are inseparable, sins are not equal; virtue, as love, exists in degrees in different acts and persons.

### Latin text

Sed quid ago? tamquam oblitus, cui loquar, doctori similis factus sum, cum proposuerim, quid abs te discere uelim. sed quia de peccatorum parilitate, unde in id, quod agebam, incidit quaestio, examinandam tibi sententiam meam promere statueram, iam eam tandem aliquando concludam, quia, etsi uerum est eum, qui habet unam, omnes habere uirtutes, eum, qui unam non habet, nullam habere, nec sic peccata sunt paria, quia, ubi uirtus nulla est, nihil quidem rectum est nec tamen ideo non est prauo prauius distortoque distortius. si autem, quod puto esse uerius sacrisque litteris congruentius, ita sunt animae intentiones ut corporis membra, non quod uideantur locis, sed quod sentiantur affectibus et aliud inluminatur amplius aliud minus aliud omnino caret lumine et tenebroso inumbratur obstaculo, profecto ita, ut quisque inlustratione piae caritatis affectus est in alio actu magis in alio minus in alio nihil, sic dici potest habere aliam, aliam non habere, aliam magis minusue habere uirtutem. nam et maior est in isto caritas quam in illo recte possumus dicere et aliqua in isto, nulla in illo, quantum pertinet ad caritatem, quae pietas est, et in ipso uno homine, quod maiorem habeat pudicitiam quam patientiam et maiorem hodie quam heri, si proficit, et adhuc non habeat continentiam et habeat non paruam misericordiam.

### English translation (Claude)

But what am I doing? As if forgetting whom I am addressing, I have become like a teacher, though I set out what I wish to learn from you. But since I had decided to put forward my opinion on the equality of sins for you to examine, because the question arose from there in what I was treating, I will now at last conclude it. Even if it is true that whoever has one virtue has all, and whoever lacks one has none, sins are not therefore equal; for where there is no virtue, nothing indeed is right, yet one wrong thing is not thereby kept from being more wrong than another, and one crooked thing more crooked. But if, as I think truer and more in keeping with the sacred writings, the intentions of the soul are like the members of the body (not because they are seen in places but because they are felt in affections), and one is lit more, another less, and another lacks light altogether and is overshadowed by a dark obstacle, then surely, just as each person is touched by the illumination of godly love more in one act, less in another, and not at all in another, so he can be said to have one virtue and not another, or to have a virtue more or less. For we can rightly say that love is greater in this man than in that, and that there is some in this one and none in that one, as far as concerns the love which is piety; and, in one and the same man, that he has greater chastity than patience, and greater today than yesterday if he is making progress, and that he does not yet have self-control but has no small mercy.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.14 (CSEL 44:601–602; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-14).

## Letter 167.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-15
- Source: CSEL 44:602–603
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Virtue is love of what ought to be loved; it is never full in this life, so all must pray “forgive us our debts,” and the commandments show us our need of grace.

### Latin text

Et ut generaliter breuiterque complectar, quam de uirtute habeo notionem, quod ad recte uiuendum adtinet, uirtus est caritas, qua id, quod diligendum est, diligitur. haec in aliis maior in aliis minor in aliis nulla est, plenissima uero, quae iam non possit augeri. quam diu hic homo uiuit, in nemine; quam diu autem augeri potest, profecto illud, quod minus est, quam debet, ex uitio est. ex quo uitio non est iustus in terra, qui faciet bonum et non peccabit; ex quo uitio non iustificabitur in conspectu dei omnis uiuens: propter quod uitium, si dixerimus, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est; propter quod etiam, quantum libet profecerimus, necessarium est nobis dicere: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, cum iam omnia in baptismo dicta. facta, cogitata dimissa sint. uidet itaque, qui recte uidet, ubi et quando et unde speranda sit illa perfectio, cui non sit quod adici possit. si autem praecepta non essent, non utique esset, ubi se homo certius inspiceret et uideret, unde auerteretur, quo conaretur. qua re gratularetur, quid precaretur. magna est ergo utilitas praeceptorum, si libero arbitrio tantum detur, ut gratia dei amplius honoretur.

### English translation (Claude)

And to sum up generally and briefly the notion I have of virtue, as far as it concerns living rightly: virtue is love, by which what ought to be loved is loved. This is greater in some, less in others, and in others absent; but in its fullest form, which can no longer be increased, it is in no one as long as a person lives here; and as long as it can be increased, whatever is less than it ought to be comes from vice. Because of this vice, “there is no righteous man on earth who will do good and not sin”; because of this vice, “no one living will be justified in God's sight”; on account of this vice, “if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us”; on account of it too, however much we have progressed, we must say, “Forgive us our debts,” though all words, deeds, and thoughts were already forgiven in baptism. So whoever sees rightly sees where, when, and from what source that perfection is to be hoped for to which nothing can be added. But if there were no commandments, there would certainly be nowhere for a person to look at himself more surely and see from what he should turn away, toward what he should strive, for what he should give thanks, and for what he should pray. Great, then, is the usefulness of the commandments, if only so much is granted to free choice that the grace of God may be honored the more.

### Scripture references

- Eccl 7:20 (7:21 Vulg.): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Eccl 7:20 (7:21 Vulgate); Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX/Vulgate); 1 John 1:8; Matt 6:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.15 (CSEL 44:602–603; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-15).

## Letter 167.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-16
- Source: CSEL 44:603–604
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: One becomes “guilty of all” because every sin offends against love, on which the whole law hangs.

### Latin text

Quae si ita se habent, unde fit omnium reus, si in uno offendat, qui totam legem seruauerit? an forte, quia plenitudo legis caritas est, qua deus proximusque diligitur, in quibus praeceptis caritatis tota lex pendet et prophetae, merito fit omnium reus, qui contra illam facit, in qua pendent omnia? nemo autem peccat nisi aduersus illam faciendo. quia non adulterabis, non homicidium facies, non furaberis, non concupisces et si quod est aliud mandatum in hoc sermone recapitulatur in eo, quod diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. dilectio proximi malum non operatur; plenitudo autem legis caritas. nemo autem diligit proximum nisi diligens deum, ut hoc, quantum potest. proximo inpendat, quem diligit tamquam se ipsum, ut et ille diligat deum. quem si ipse non diligit, nec se nec proximum diligit. ac per hoc, qui totam legem seruauerit, si in uno offenderit, fit omnium reus, quia contra caritatem facit, unde tota lex pendet. reus itaque fit omnium faciendo contra eam, in qua pendent omnia.

### English translation (Claude)

If these things are so, how does one who has kept the whole law become guilty of all if he stumbles in one point? Is it perhaps because love is the fullness of the law, love by which God and neighbor are loved, on which commandments of love the whole law and the prophets hang, that the one who acts against that love, on which all things hang, rightly becomes guilty of all? And no one sins except by acting against it. For “You shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder, you shall not steal, you shall not covet, and any other commandment there may be, is summed up in this word: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. Love of neighbor works no evil; but love is the fullness of the law.” And no one loves his neighbor unless he loves God, so that he may bestow on the neighbor whom he loves as himself, as far as he can, this: that the neighbor too may love God. If he himself does not love God, he loves neither himself nor his neighbor. And so whoever has kept the whole law, if he stumbles in one point, becomes guilty of all, because he acts against love, on which the whole law hangs. He becomes guilty of all, then, by acting against that on which all things hang.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:9–10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 13:9–10; Matt 22:40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.16 (CSEL 44:603–604; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-16).

## Letter 167.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-17
- Source: CSEL 44:604–605
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Guilt is greater or less according to how far one acts against love, so sins are not equal even though each makes one guilty of all.

### Latin text

Cur ergo non dicantur paria peccata? an forte quia magis facit contra caritatem, qui grauius peccat, minus, qui leuius, et hoc ipso admittit magis et minus, quo fit quidem omnium reus, sed grauius peccans uel in pluribus peccans magis reus, leuius autem uel in paucioribus peccans minus reus tanto maiore scilicet reatu, quanto amplius, tanto minore, quanto minus peccauerit, tamen, etiam si in uno offenderit. reus omnium, quia contra eam facit, in qua pendent omnia? quae si uera sunt, eo modo et illud absoluitur, quod ait homo etiam apostolicae gratiae: In multis enim offendimus omnes; offendimus enim, sed alius grauius alius leuius, quanto quisque magis minusue peccauerit, tanto in peccato committendo maior quanto in diligendo deo et proximo minor et rursus tanto minor in peccati perpetratione quanto maior in dei et proximi dilectione, tanto itaque plenior iniquitatis quanto inanior caritatis et tunc perfectissimus in caritate, quando nihil restat ex infirmitate.

### English translation (Claude)

Why then are sins not called equal? Perhaps because the one who sins more gravely acts more against love, and the one who sins more lightly acts less against it; and by the very fact that it admits of more and less, though one does become guilty of all, yet the one who sins more gravely or in more things is more guilty, and the one who sins more lightly or in fewer things is less guilty: with a greater guilt the more he has sinned, a lesser the less; yet, even if he stumbles in one point, he is guilty of all, because he acts against that on which all things hang. If this is true, in this way that saying too is resolved which a man of apostolic grace made: “For we all stumble in many things.” We do stumble, but one more gravely, another more lightly; the more or less each has sinned, the greater he is in committing sin, the less in loving God and neighbor; and again, the less in the perpetration of sin, the greater in the love of God and neighbor. So he is the fuller of iniquity, the emptier of love; and he will be most perfect in love when nothing remains of weakness.

### Scripture references

- Jas 3:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Jas 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.17 (CSEL 44:604–605; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-17).

## Letter 167.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-18
- Source: CSEL 44:605–606
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Partiality is a grave sin if it concerns church offices; in ordinary seating it is sin when one inwardly judges the rich better.

### Latin text

Nec sane, quantum arbitror, putandum est lene esse peccatum in personarum acceptione habere fidem domini Iesu Christi. si illam distantiam sedendi et standi ad honores ecclesiasticos referamus. quis enim ferat eligi diuitem ad sedem honoris ecclesiae contempto paupere instructiore atque sanctiore? si autem de cotidianis consessibus loquitur, quis non hic peccat, si tamen peccat, nisi cum apud se ipsum intus ita iudicat, ut ei tanto melior quanto ditior illo uideatur? hoc enim uidetur significasse dicendo: Nonne iudicastis apud uosmet ipsos et facti estis iudices cogitationum iniquarum?

### English translation (Claude)

Nor, I think, should it be supposed a light sin to hold the faith of the Lord Jesus Christ with partiality, if we refer that difference between sitting and standing to the honors of the church. For who would tolerate a rich man being chosen for a seat of honor in the church while a poor man better instructed and holier is despised? But if he is speaking of daily seating, who does not sin here, if indeed he sins, unless he judges inwardly in himself that the one man seems to him better than the other in proportion as he is richer? This is what he seems to have meant by saying: “Have you not judged among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?”

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Jas 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.18 (CSEL 44:605–606; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-18).

## Letter 167.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-19
- Source: CSEL 44:606–607
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law of liberty is the law of love; James offers works of mercy as the daily remedy for daily sins.

### Latin text

Lex itaque libertatis lex caritatis est, de qua dicit: Si tamen legem perficitis regalem secundum scripturas: Diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum, bene facitis; si autem personas accipitis, peccatum operamini redarguti a lege quasi transgressores. et post illam sententiam ad intellegendum difficillimam, de qua satis dixi, quod dicendum putaui, eandem legem libertatis commemorans: Sic, inquit, loquimini et sic facite sicut per legem libertatis incipientes iudicari. et quoniam, quid paulo ante dixerit, nouit, quoniam in multis offendimus omnes, suggerit dominicam tamquam cotidianam cotidianis etsi leuioribus tamen uulneribus medicinam. iudicium enim, inquit, sine misericordia illi, qui non fecit misericordiam. hinc enim et dominus: Dimittite, inquit, et dimittetur uobis, date et dabitur nobis. superexultat autem misericordia iudicio. non dictum est: Vincit misericordia iudicium, non enim est aduersa iudicio, sed superexultat, quia plures per misericordiam colliguntur, sed qui misericordiam praestiterunt. beati enim misericordes, quia ipsorum miserebitur deus.

### English translation (Claude)

The law of liberty, then, is the law of love, of which he says: “If indeed you fulfill the royal law according to the Scriptures, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself,’ you do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” And after that sentence so hard to understand, about which I have said enough of what I thought should be said, he mentions the same law of liberty: “So speak and so act as those who are beginning to be judged by the law of liberty.” And since he knows what he said a little earlier, that “we all stumble in many things,” he suggests the Lord's medicine as a daily remedy for daily, though lighter, wounds. “For judgment,” he says, “is without mercy to the one who has not shown mercy.” For hence also the Lord says: “Forgive, and you will be forgiven; give, and it will be given to you.” “But mercy exults over judgment.” It does not say “mercy conquers judgment,” for it is not opposed to judgment; but it “exults over” it, because more are gathered in through mercy, but those who have shown mercy. “For blessed are the merciful, for God will have mercy on them.”

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:8–9: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:12–13: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 6:37–38: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Jas 2:8–9; Jas 2:12–13; Jas 3:2; Luke 6:37–38; Matt 5:7 (Augustine's wording, “God will have mercy on them”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.19 (CSEL 44:606–607; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-19).

## Letter 167.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-20
- Source: CSEL 44:607–608
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God unites mercy and judgment; those who forgive and give find mercy for their daily sins.

### Latin text

Et hoc utique iustum est, ut dimittatur eis, quia dimiserunt, et detur eis, quia dederunt. inest quippe deo et misericordia iudicanti et iudicium miseranti. propter quod ei dicitur: Misericordiam et iudicium cantabo tibi, domine: nam quisquis uelut nimium iustus iudicium sine misericordia quasi securus expectat, iram iustissimam prouocat, quam timens ille dicit: Ne intres in iudicium cum seruo tuo. unde dicitur populo contumaci: Quid uultis mecum iudicio contendere? cum enim rex iustus sederit in throno, quis gloriabitur castum se habere cor? aut quis gloriabitur mundum se esse a peccato? quae igitur spes est, nisi superexultet misericordia iudicio sed erga illos, qui misericordiam fecerunt ueraciter dicendo: Dimitte nobis, sicut et nos dimittimus, et sine murmuratione dando? hilarem enim datorem diligit deus. denique sanctus Iacobus iam ex isto loco de misericordiae operibus loquitur. ut, quos uehementer illa sententia terruerat, consoletur, cum admonet. quo modo etiam peccata cotidiana, sine quibus hic non uiuitur, cotidianis remediis expientur, ne homo, qui, cum in uno offenderit, fiat omnium reus, in multis offendendo, quia in multis offendimus omnes. magnum aggerem reatus sui minutatim collectum ad tribunal tanti iudicis peruehat et eam, quam non fecit. misericordiam non inueniat, sed potius dimittendo atque donando mereatur sibi dimitti debita reddique promissa.

### English translation (Claude)

And it is certainly just that they be forgiven because they have forgiven, and be given to because they have given. For in God there is both mercy when he judges and judgment when he shows mercy. That is why it is said to him: “Of mercy and judgment I will sing to you, O Lord.” For whoever, as if too righteous, awaits judgment without mercy as though secure, provokes a most just wrath, which he feared who said: “Do not enter into judgment with your servant.” Hence it is said to a stubborn people: “Why do you wish to contend with me in judgment?” “For when the righteous king sits on his throne, who will boast that he has a chaste heart? Or who will boast that he is clean from sin?” What hope is there, then, unless mercy exults over judgment, but toward those who have shown mercy, saying truthfully, “Forgive us, as we also forgive,” and giving without grumbling? “For God loves a cheerful giver.” Finally, holy James speaks from this point on about works of mercy, to console those whom that sentence had greatly frightened, when he reminds them how even daily sins, without which no one lives here, are expiated by daily remedies; lest a person, who becomes guilty of all when he stumbles in one point, by stumbling in many (since we all stumble in many things) should carry a great heap of his guilt, gathered little by little, to the tribunal of so great a Judge, and not find the mercy he did not show, but rather, by forgiving and giving, may merit to have his debts forgiven and the promises fulfilled to him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 101:1 (100:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jer 2:29: quotation, medium confidence
- Prov 20:8–9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 9:7: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 101:1 (100:1 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX/Vulgate); Jer 2:29 (Latin from the Greek); Prov 20:8–9 (LXX wording); Matt 6:12; 2 Cor 9:7; Jas 2:13; Jas 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.20 (CSEL 44:607–608; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-20).

## Letter 167.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-21
- Source: CSEL 44:608–610
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Jerome to correct him and to share any better explanation of James 2:10.

### Latin text

Multa dixi, quibus tibi taedium fortassis inferrem. qui haec, quae tamen adprobas, non expectas discere, quia ea docere consuesti. si quid autem est in eis, quantum ad res ipsas pertinet — nam quali eloquio explicata sint, non nimis curo —, si quid ergo est in eis, quod eruditionem offendat, tuam, quaeso, ut rescribendo admoneas et me corrigere non graueris. infelix est enim, qui non tantos et tam sanctos tuorum studiorum labores et digne honorat et de his domino deo nostro, cuius munere talis es, gratias agit. unde cum libentius debeam a quolibet discere, quod inutiliter ignoro, quam promptius quoslibet docere, quod scio, quanto iustius hoc abs te caritatis debitum flagito, cuius doctrina in nomine et adiutorio domini tantum in Latina lingua ecclesiasticae litterae adiutae sunt, quantum numquam antea potuerunt! maxime tamen istam sententiam: Quicumque totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus si quo alio modo melius exponi posse nouit dilectio tua, per dominum obsecro, uti nobiscum communicare digneris.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said much, by which I may perhaps have caused you weariness, since you do not expect to learn these things, which you nevertheless approve, being accustomed to teach them. But if there is anything in them, as far as the matters themselves are concerned (for I do not care much in what style they have been set out), if, then, there is anything in them that offends your learning, please warn me by writing back, and do not be reluctant to correct me. For unhappy is the one who does not both duly honor such great and holy labors of your studies and give thanks for them to the Lord our God, by whose gift you are what you are. Hence, since I ought more gladly to learn from anyone what I am unprofitably ignorant of than to teach anyone readily what I know, how much more justly do I claim this debt of love from you, by whose learning, in the name and with the help of the Lord, church literature in the Latin language has been helped as never before! Above all, however, if your love knows any better way in which this sentence can be explained, “Whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all,” I implore you by the Lord, be so kind as to share it with us.

### Scripture references

- Jas 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Jas 2:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 167.21 (CSEL 44:608–610; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-167-21).

## Letter 168.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-168-1
- Source: CSEL 44:610–611
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Timasius and James, former followers of Pelagius, thank Augustine for his reply to Pelagius's book (On Nature and Grace).

### Latin text

Ita nos refecit et recreauit gratia dei ministrata per uerbum tuum, ut prorsus germane dicamus: Misit uerbum suum et sanauit eos, domine beatissime et merito uenerabilis pater. sane ea diligentia uentilasse sanctitatem tuam textum eiusdem libelli reperimus, ut ad singulos apices responsa reddita stupeamus, siue in his, quae refutare, detestari ac fugere deceat Christianum, siue in illis, in quibus non satis inuenitur errasse, quamuis nescio qua calliditate in ipsis quoque gratiam dei credidit supprimendam. sed unum est, quod nos in tanto beneficio afficit, quia tarde hoc tam praeclarum gratiae dei munus effulsit, si quidem contigit absentes fieri quosdam. quorum caecitati ista tam perspicuae ueritatis inlustratio deberetur; ad quos etsi tardius non diffidimus propitio deo eandem gratiam peruenire, qui uult omnes homines saluos fieri et ad agnitionem ueritatis uenire. nos uero, etsi olim spiritu caritatis, qui in te est, docti subiectionem eius abiecerimus erroris, in hoc etiam nunc gratias agimus, quod haec, quae ante credidimus, nunc aliis aperire didicimus uiam facilitatis uberiore sanctitatis tuae sermone pandente. [Et alia manu:] Incolumem beatitudinem tuam nostrique memorem misericordia dei nostri glorificet in aeternum.

### English translation (Claude)

The grace of God, ministered through your word, has so refreshed and restored us that we can say with complete truth, “He sent his word and healed them,” most blessed lord and deservedly venerable father. We have found that Your Holiness sifted the text of that little book with such care that we are amazed at the answers given to every point, both in the things a Christian ought to refute, abhor, and flee, and in those in which the author is not found to have erred greatly, although with some cunning or other he believed that even in these the grace of God should be suppressed. But one thing affects us in so great a benefit: that this splendid gift of God's grace shone forth late, since it has happened that some have gone away, to whose blindness this illumination of so clear a truth was owed. Yet we do not despair that the same grace will reach them, though later, by the favor of God, “who wills all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” As for us, although long ago, taught by the spirit of love that is in you, we cast off subjection to that error, we give thanks even now for this: that what we believed before, we have now learned to open to others, as the fuller discourse of Your Holiness lays out the way for us with ease. [And in another hand:] May the mercy of our God keep Your Blessedness safe and mindful of us, and glorify you forever.

### Scripture references

- Ps 107:20 (106:20 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Nat. et grat. (On Nature and Grace): allusion, high confidence
- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The writers are Timasius and James, who had sent Augustine Pelagius's book On Nature; Augustine answered it in On Nature and Grace.
- Quotations: Ps 107:20 (106:20 LXX/Vulgate); 1 Tim 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 168.1 (CSEL 44:610–611; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/167-1/#p-168-1).

## Letter 169.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-1
- Source: CSEL 44:611–612
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Evodius of his progress on the City of God (books 1–5), the Psalms, and the unfinished On the Trinity, and asks not to be diverted.

### Latin text

Si ea, quae me magis occupant, a quibus in aliud auerti nolo, sanctitas tua nosse tanti habet, mitte aliquem, qui tibi describat. iam enim plura perfecta sunt, quae hoc anno ante pascha propinquante quadragesima a nobis fuerant inchoata. nam tribus illis libris de ciuitate dei contra daemonicolas inimicos. eius duos alios addidimus, quibus quinque libris satis disputatum arbitror aduersus eos, qui propter praesentis uitae felicitatem deos colendos putant eamque felicitatem a nobis impediri opinantes Christiano nomini infesti sunt. deinceps dicendum est, sicut primo libro polliciti sumus. aduersus eos, qui propter uitam post mortem futuram necessarium existimant cultum deorum suorum, propter quam uitam nos Christiani sumus. dictaui etiam trium psalmorum expositionem non paruis uoluminibus, sexagesimi et septimi, septuagesimi et primi, septuagesimi et septimi. reliqui nondum dictati neque tractati uehementer a nobis expectantur atque flagitantur. ab his me reuocari et retardari inruentibus de transuerso quibuslibet quaestionibus nolo, ita ut nec libros de trinitate, quos diu in manibus uerso nondumque compleui, modo adtendere uelim, quoniam nimis operosi. sunt et a paucis eos intellegi posse arbitror. unde magis urgent, quae pluribus utilia fore speramus.

### English translation (Claude)

If Your Holiness sets so much store by knowing the works that occupy me more, from which I do not wish to be diverted to anything else, send someone to copy them for you. For several things have now been completed that I had begun this year before Easter, as Lent was approaching. To those three books On the City of God against its enemies, the worshipers of demons, I have added two more, and in these five books I think enough has been argued against those who suppose the gods are to be worshiped for the sake of happiness in this present life, and who, thinking that we hinder that happiness, are hostile to the Christian name. Next, as we promised in the first book, we must speak against those who think the worship of their gods necessary for the sake of the life that is to come after death, the life for whose sake we are Christians. I have also dictated an exposition of three psalms, in volumes of no small size: the sixty-seventh, the seventy-first, and the seventy-seventh. The rest, not yet dictated or treated, are eagerly awaited and demanded from us. I do not want to be called back and delayed from these by questions breaking in from the side, so much so that I am unwilling at present to attend even to the books On the Trinity, which I have long had in hand and not yet finished, since they are very laborious and I think can be understood by few. So the works we hope will be useful to more people press harder.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Civ. 1–5 (City of God): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Psalms 67, 71, 77 in the Latin (Vulgate) numbering = Pss 68, 72, 78.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.1 (CSEL 44:611–612; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-1).

## Letter 169.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-2
- Source: CSEL 44:612–613
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that 1 Cor 14:38 (“if anyone is ignorant, he will be ignored”) concerns church order, not inability to understand the Trinity.

### Latin text

Non enim, ut scribis, qui ignorat, ignorabitur de hac re dixit apostolus, tamquam ista poena ille plectendus sit, qui non ualet intellegentia sic discernere ineffabilem trinitatis unitatem, sicut discernitur in animo nostro memoria. intellectus, uoluntas. aliunde hoc dicebat apostolus. lege et uidebis, quod ea loquebatur, quae fidem uel mores multorum aedificarent, non quae uix ad paucorum eamque exiguam. quantulacumque in hac uita de re tanta esse potest, intellegentiam peruenirent, id est ut linguis prophetia praeponeretur, ut non perturbate illa gererentur, quasi prophetiae spiritus etiam inuitos loqui cogeret, ut mulieres in ecclesia tacerent, ut omnia honeste et secundum ordinem fierent. haec cum ageret, ait: Si quis uidetur propheta esse aut spiritalis, cognoscat, quae scribo uobis. quia domini est mandatum. si quis autem ignorat. ignorabitur, his uerbis cohercens et ad pacificum ordinem reuocans inquietos tanto ad seditionem faciliores, quanto sibi uidebantur spiritu excellere, cum superbiendo cuncta turbarent. si quis ergo uidetur propheta esse aut spiritalis. cognoscat, inquit, quae scribo uobis, quia domini est mandatum. si quis uidetur esse et utique non est; nam qui est, sine dubitatione cognoscit nec admonitione et cohortatione opus habet, quia omnia iudicat et a nemine iudicatur. illi ergo seditiones et perturbationes in ecclesia faciebant, qui uidebantur esse, quod non erant. hos docet cognoscere domini esse mandatum, quia non est seditionis deus sed pacis. si quis autem ignorat, ignorabitur, id est inprobabitur. non enim deus, si ad scientiam referas, ignorat eos, quibus dicturus est: Non noui uos, sed eorum inprobatio hoc uerbo insinuata est.

### English translation (Claude)

For the apostle did not say, as you write, “Whoever is ignorant will be ignored,” about this matter, as though that penalty were to strike whoever cannot distinguish in understanding the ineffable unity of the Trinity as memory, understanding, and will are distinguished in our mind. The apostle said this in another connection. Read, and you will see that he was speaking of things that would build up the faith or morals of many, not of things that would scarcely reach the understanding of a few, and that small, however little understanding of so great a matter there can be in this life: namely, that prophecy should be preferred to tongues; that these things should not be done in disorder, as though the spirit of prophecy forced people to speak even against their will; that women should be silent in the church; that all things should be done decently and in order. When he was dealing with these matters, he said: “If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that what I write to you is the Lord's commandment. But if anyone is ignorant, he will be ignored.” With these words he restrains and calls back to peaceful order the restless, who were the readier for sedition the more they seemed to themselves to excel in the Spirit, while by their pride they threw everything into confusion. “If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual,” he says, “let him acknowledge that what I write to you is the Lord's commandment.” “If anyone thinks he is”: and certainly is not; for one who is, knows without doubt and has no need of admonition and exhortation, because “he judges all things and is judged by no one.” Those, then, were causing seditions and disturbances in the church who seemed to be what they were not. He teaches them to acknowledge that it is the Lord's commandment, because God is not a God of sedition but of peace. “But if anyone is ignorant, he will be ignored,” that is, he will be disapproved. For God, if you refer it to knowledge, is not ignorant of those to whom he is going to say, “I do not know you”; but their disapproval is suggested by this word.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 14:37–38: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 14:34: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 14:40: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 14:33: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 14:37–38; 1 Cor 2:15; Matt 25:12. Allusions to 1 Cor 14 (prophecy and tongues, 14:34 women's silence, 14:33, 14:40).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.2 (CSEL 44:612–613; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-2).

## Letter 169.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-3
- Source: CSEL 44:613–614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Salvation comes through the foolishness of preaching, not through ability to understand God's nature.

### Latin text

Cum autem dominus dicat: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, eaque uisio in fine summum praemium nobis promittatur, non est metuendum, si nunc ad liquidum. quae de dei natura credimus, conspicere non ualemus, ne inde sit dictum: Qui ignorat, ignorabitur. quia enim in sapientia dei non cognouit mundus per sapientiam deum, placuit deo per stultitiam praedicationis saluos facere credentes. haec stultitia praedicationis ac stultum dei, quod sapientius est hominibus, multos contrahit ad salutem, ut non solum qui nondum ualent certa intellegentia conspicere naturam dei, quam fide tenent, uerum etiam qui nondum in ipsa anima sua ita incorpoream substantiam a corporis generalitate discernunt, quem ad modum certi sunt se uiuere, nosse, uelle, non sint alieni a salute, quam stultitia illa praedicationis fidelibus confert.

### English translation (Claude)

Since the Lord says, “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God,” and that vision is promised to us at the end as the highest reward, we need not fear, if we cannot now clearly behold what we believe about the nature of God, that the words “Whoever is ignorant will be ignored” were said on that account. For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the foolishness of preaching to save those who believe. This foolishness of preaching, and the foolishness of God that is wiser than men, draws many to salvation; so that not only those who cannot yet behold with sure understanding the nature of God which they hold by faith, but also those who do not yet distinguish incorporeal substance from the general class of body in their own soul, as surely as they are sure that they live, know, and will, are not strangers to the salvation which that foolishness of preaching confers on believers.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:25: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 5:8; 1 Cor 1:21, 25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.3 (CSEL 44:613–614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-3).

## Letter 169.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-4
- Source: CSEL 44:614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many simple believers who glory in the cross reach eternal life, while some subtle thinkers who mock the gospel go astray.

### Latin text

Nam si propter eos solos Christus mortuus est, qui certa intellegentia possunt ista discernere, paene frustra in ecclesia laboramus. si autem, quod ueritas habet, infirmi populi credentium ad medicum currunt sanandi per Christum et hunc crucifixum, ut, ubi abundauit peccatum, superabundet gratia, miris fit modis per altitudinem diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei et per inscrutabilia iudicia eius, ut et nonnulli a corporibus incorporea discernentes, cum sibi ex hoc magni uidentur et inrident stultitiam praedicationis, qua salui fiunt credentes, ab unica uia longe exerrent, quae ad uitam aeternam sola perducit, et multi in cruce Christi gloriantes et ab eadem uia non recedentes, etiam qui ista, quae subtilissime disseruntur, ignorant, quia non perit unus pusillus, pro quibus mortuus est, ad eandem perueniant aeternitatem, ueritatem. caritatem, id est ad stabilem, certam plenamque felicitatem. ubi manentibus, uidentibus, amantibus sint cuncta perspicua.

### English translation (Claude)

For if Christ died only for those who can distinguish these things with sure understanding, we labor almost in vain in the church. But if, as the truth is, the weak multitudes of believers run to the physician to be healed through Christ, and him crucified, so that where sin abounded grace may abound all the more, then in wonderful ways, through the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God and through his unsearchable judgments, it comes about that some who distinguish incorporeal from bodily things, thinking themselves great on that account and mocking the foolishness of preaching by which believers are saved, wander far from the one way that alone leads to eternal life; while many who glory in the cross of Christ and do not withdraw from that way, even those who are ignorant of these things that are discussed with great subtlety, come to the same eternity, truth, and love, that is, to stable, sure, and full happiness, because not one of the little ones for whom he died perishes; and there, abiding, seeing, and loving, all things are clear to them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 18:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 2:2; Rom 5:20; Rom 11:33; 1 Cor 1:21; Gal 6:14; Matt 18:14; 1 Cor 8:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.4 (CSEL 44:614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-4).

## Letter 169.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-5
- Source: CSEL 44:614–615
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A statement of the faith in one God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, inseparable in being and work, yet shown separately at Christ's baptism.

### Latin text

Proinde in unum deum patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum firma pietate credamus, ita ut nec filius credatur esse, qui pater est, nec pater, qui filius est, nec pater nec filius, qui utriusque spiritus est. nihil putetur in hac trinitate temporibus locisue distare, sed haec tria aequalia esse et coaeterna et omnino esse una natura, non a patre aliam et a filio aliam et a spiritu sancto aliam conditam esse creaturam, sed omnia et singula, quae creata sunt uel creantur, trinitate creante subsistere. nec quemquam liberari a patre sine filio et spiritu sancto aut a filio sine patre et spiritu sancto aut a spiritu sancto sine patre et filio sed a patre et filio et spiritu sancto uno uero uereque inmortali, id est omni modo incommutabili solo deo. multa autem etiam separatim in scripturis de singulis dici, ut insinuetur quamuis inseparabilis trinitas tamen trinitas, ut, quem ad modum simul dici non possunt, cum sonis corporalibus commemorantur, quamuis simul sint inseparabiliter, ita et quibusdam scripturarum locis et per quasdam creaturas singillatim uicissimque monstrentur sicut pater in uoce, qua sonuit: Tu es filius meus, et filius in homine, quem suscepit ex uirgine, et spiritus sanctus in columbae specie corporali. haec separatim quidem sed nullo modo separata tria illa demonstrant.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore let us believe with firm piety in one God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; so that the Son is not believed to be the one who is the Father, nor the Father the one who is the Son, nor either Father or Son the one who is the Spirit of both. Let nothing in this Trinity be thought to differ in time or place, but let these three be thought equal and coeternal and altogether of one nature; not one creation made by the Father, another by the Son, and another by the Holy Spirit, but all things, and each thing, that have been or are being created subsist by the creative act of the Trinity. And let us believe that no one is set free by the Father without the Son and the Holy Spirit, or by the Son without the Father and the Holy Spirit, or by the Holy Spirit without the Father and the Son, but by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the one true and truly immortal, that is, in every way unchangeable, only God. Yet many things are also said in the Scriptures of each separately, to convey that though the Trinity is inseparable, it is still a Trinity; so that, just as they cannot be named together when they are mentioned with bodily sounds, though they exist together inseparably, so too in certain passages of Scripture and through certain creatures they are shown singly and in turn: as the Father in the voice that sounded, “You are my Son,” the Son in the man whom he took from the virgin, and the Holy Spirit in the bodily form of a dove. These show the three separately, yet in no way separated.

### Scripture references

- Mark 1:10–11: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 3:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Mark 1:10–11 (and parallels) for the voice and the dove.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.5 (CSEL 44:614–615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-5).

## Letter 169.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-6
- Source: CSEL 44:615–616
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Memory, understanding, and will illustrate, imperfectly, how the Trinity works inseparably even when one Person is shown.

### Latin text

Ad hoc utcumque intellegendum adsumimus memoriam, intellegentiam, uoluntatem. quamuis enim haec suis separatisque temporibus singillatim singula enuntiemus, nihil tamen horum sine aliis duobus agimus uel dicimus. nec ideo putanda sunt haec tria trinitati sic comparata, ut omni ex parte conueniant; cui enim similitudini in disputando conuenientia tanta conceditur, ut ei rei, cui adhibenda est, omni ex parte coaptetur? uel quando ex creatura ad creatorem aliquid simile adsumitur? primo ergo in hoc inuenitur ista similitudo dissimilis, quod tria haec, memoria, intellegentia, uoluntas, animae insunt, non eadem tria est anima; illa uero trinitas non inest, sed ipsa deus est. ideo ibi mirabilis simplicitas commendatur, quia non ibi aliud est esse aliud intellegere uel si quid aliud de dei natura dicitur; anima uero quia est, etiam dum non intellegit, aliud est, quod est, aliud, quod intellegit. deinde quis audeat dicere patrem non intellegere per se ipsum sed per filium, sicut memoria non intellegit per se ipsam sed per intellectum uel potius anima ipsa, cui haec insunt, per intellectum tantum modo intellegit, sicut per memoriam tantum modo meminit et per uoluntatem tantum modo uult? ad hoc ergo adhibetur ista similitudo, ut quoquo modo intellegatur, quem ad modum horum trium in anima cum singula nomina enuntiantur, quibus eadem singula demonstrantur, tamen unumquodque nomen his tribus cooperantibus enuntiatur, cum et reminiscendo et intellegendo et uolendo dicitur, ita nullam esse creaturam, qua uel solus pater uel solus filius uel solus spiritus sanctus demonstretur, quam non simul trinitas operetur, quae inseparabiliter operatur, ac per hoc nec uocem patris nec animam et carnem filii nec columbam spiritus sancti esse factam nisi eadem cooperante trinitate.

### English translation (Claude)

To understand this in some measure we take memory, understanding, and will. For though we utter each of these singly at its own separate time, we do or say nothing by any of them without the other two. Yet these three must not be thought to be compared with the Trinity in such a way that they correspond in every respect; for to what comparison in argument is such correspondence granted that it fits in every part the thing to which it is applied? Or when is anything taken from the creature as a likeness of the Creator? First, then, this likeness is found unlike in that these three, memory, understanding, and will, are in the soul, but are not the soul itself; whereas that Trinity is not in God, but is itself God. Therefore a wonderful simplicity is proclaimed there, because there it is not one thing to be and another to understand, or whatever else is said of the nature of God; but the soul, because it exists even when it does not understand, is one thing in that it is, another in that it understands. Next, who would dare to say that the Father does not understand by himself but by the Son, as memory does not understand by itself but by the understanding, or rather the soul itself, in which these are, understands only by the understanding, as it remembers only by memory and wills only by will? The likeness is applied, then, to this end: that it may be understood in some way that, just as with these three in the soul, when the single names are uttered by which each of them is indicated, yet each name is uttered by the cooperation of the three, since it is said by remembering, understanding, and willing; so there is no creature by which the Father alone, or the Son alone, or the Holy Spirit alone is shown, which the Trinity does not produce together, since it works inseparably; and so neither the Father's voice, nor the soul and flesh of the Son, nor the dove of the Holy Spirit, was made except by the cooperation of the same Trinity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.6 (CSEL 44:615–616; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-6).

## Letter 169.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-7
- Source: CSEL 44:616–617
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The voice and the dove were passing signs, but the man assumed by the Word was united to him in one person, the Word remaining unchanged.

### Latin text

Nec sane sonus ille uocis, qui continuo esse destitit, coaptatus est in unitatem personae patris nec illa columbae species corporalis coaptata est in unitatem personae spiritus sancti: nam ipsa quoque sicut nubes illa lucida, quae operuit in monte cum tribus discipulis saluatorem, uel potius sicut ille ignis, qui eundem spiritum sanctum demonstrauit, officio significationis impleto mox esse desiuit. sed solus homo, quia propter ipsam naturam liberandam illa omnia fiebant, in unitatem personae uerbi dei, hoc est unici filii dei mirabili et singulari susceptione coaptatus est permanente tamen uerbo in sua natura incommutabiliter, in qua nihil compositi, cum quo subsistat ulla phantasia humani animi, suspicandum est. legitur quidem: Et spiritus sapientiae multiplex, sed recte dicitur etiam simplex; multiplex enim, quoniam multa sunt, quae habet, simplex autem, quia non aliud, quam quod habet, est, sicut dictus est filius habere uitam in semet ipso et eadem uita ipse est. homo autem uerbo accessit, non uerbum in hominem conuertibiliter accessit; atque ita et filius dei simul cum homine suscepto dicitur. unde idem filius dei incommutabilis est atque coaeternus patri sed in uerbo solo et sepultus est filius dei sed in carne sola.

### English translation (Claude)

Certainly that sound of a voice, which at once ceased to be, was not joined into the unity of the person of the Father, nor was that bodily form of a dove joined into the unity of the person of the Holy Spirit; for it too, like that bright cloud which covered the Savior on the mountain with three disciples, or rather like that fire which showed the same Holy Spirit, ceased to exist as soon as its office of signifying was fulfilled. But the man alone, because all those things were done for the sake of freeing that very nature, was joined into the unity of the person of the Word of God, that is, of the only Son of God, by a wonderful and singular taking up, while the Word remained unchangeably in its own nature, in which nothing composite is to be imagined, with which any fantasy of the human mind could subsist. It is indeed written, “And the spirit of wisdom is manifold,” but it is rightly also called simple; manifold because the things it has are many, simple because it is nothing other than what it has, as the Son is said to have life in himself and is himself that same life. The man was added to the Word; the Word did not pass by change into the man; and thus he is called the Son of God together with the man taken up. Hence the same Son of God is unchangeable and coeternal with the Father, but in the Word alone; and the Son of God was also buried, but in the flesh alone.

### Scripture references

- Matt 17:5: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 5:26: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:22 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 17:5 (the bright cloud); Acts 2:3 (fire); John 5:26. Quotation: Wis 7:22 (outside the 66 books).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.7 (CSEL 44:616–617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-7).

## Letter 169.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-8
- Source: CSEL 44:617–618
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: By analogy with a philosopher who is beaten in body, it is rightly said that God was crucified, though he suffered in the flesh.

### Latin text

Proinde, quae de filio dei uerba dicuntur, uidendum est, secundum quid dicantur. non enim homine adsumpto personarum numerus auctus est, sed eadem trinitas mansit. nam sicut in homine quolibet praeter unum illum, qui singulariter susceptus est, anima et corpus una persona est, ita in Christo uerbum et homo una persona est. et sicut homo uerbi gratia philosophus non utique nisi secundum animam dicitur nec ideo tamen absurde sed congruentissima et usitatissima locutione dicimus philosophum caesum, philosophum mortuum, philosophum sepultum, cum totum secundum carnem accidat non secundum illud, quod est philosophus, ita Christus deus. dei filius, dominus gloriae et si quid huius modi secundum uerbum dicitur et tamen recte dicitur deus crucifixus, cum hoc eum secundum carnem passum esse non secundum illud, quod dominus gloriae est, non habeatur incertum.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, when words are said of the Son of God, we must see in respect of what they are said. For by the taking of a man the number of persons was not increased; the same Trinity remained. For just as in any man (except that one who was taken up in a singular way) soul and body are one person, so in Christ the Word and the man are one person. And just as a man is called, for example, a philosopher only with respect to his soul, and yet it is not absurd but a most fitting and usual way of speaking to say “the philosopher was beaten,” “the philosopher died,” “the philosopher was buried,” although all of it happens with respect to the flesh, not with respect to that by which he is a philosopher; so Christ is called God, Son of God, Lord of glory, and anything of this kind, with respect to the Word, and yet it is rightly said that God was crucified, since there is no uncertainty that he suffered this with respect to the flesh, not with respect to that by which he is the Lord of glory.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 1 Cor 2:8 (“Lord of glory”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.8 (CSEL 44:617–618; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-8).

## Letter 169.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-9
- Source: CSEL 44:618
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The voice, dove, tongues of fire, and the signs at Sinai were passing signs; God's nature did not change.

### Latin text

Sonitus autem ille uocis et columbae species corporalis et linguae diuisae uelut ignis, qui insedit super unumquemque eorum, sicut illa in monte Sina, quae terribili specie facta sunt, et sicut columna illa nubis per diem et flammae per noctem significatiua operatione acta atque transacta sunt. illud in his maxime cauendum est, ne cuiquam dei natura uel patris uel filii uel spiritus sancti commutabilis et conuertibilis esse credatur. nec moueat, quod aliquando res, quae significat. nomen eius rei, quam significat, accipit. spiritus sanctus dictus est corporali specie tamquam columba descendisse et mansisse super eum; sic enim et petra Christus, quia significat Christum.

### English translation (Claude)

That sound of a voice, and the bodily form of a dove, and the tongues divided as of fire that sat upon each of them, like the things on Mount Sinai that were done in terrifying appearance, and like that pillar of cloud by day and of fire by night, were brought about and passed away by a signifying action. In these things we must above all beware lest anyone believe that the nature of God, whether of Father or Son or Holy Spirit, is changeable and convertible. Nor should anyone be troubled that sometimes the thing that signifies receives the name of the thing it signifies. The Holy Spirit is said to have descended in bodily form like a dove and to have remained on him; so too the rock was Christ, because it signifies Christ.

### Scripture references

- Acts 2:3: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 19:16–19: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 13:21: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 3:22: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:32: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Acts 2:3; Exod 19:16–19; Exod 13:21; Luke 3:22; John 1:32; 1 Cor 10:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.9 (CSEL 44:618; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-9).

## Letter 169.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-10
- Source: CSEL 44:618–619
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues against Evodius that, like the voice from heaven, the dove could appear without any animal soul, as a bodily form produced by God.

### Latin text

Miror autem tibi uideri sonitum uocis illius, qua dictum est: Tu es filius meus, non mediante anima sed diuino nutu sola corporali natura sic fieri potuisse et non tibi uideri eodem modo potuisse fieri animantis cuiuslibet speciem corporalem motumque uiuenti similem diuino nutu nullo animali interposito spiritu. si enim obtemperat deo creatura corporea sine uiuificantis animae ministerio, ut edantur soni, quales edi ex corpore animato solent, ut forma locutionis articulatae auribus inferatur, cur non obtemperet, ut sine animae uiuificantis ministerio figura motusque uolucris eadem potentia creatoris ingeratur aspectibus? an sensus audiendi hoc mereri potest, uidendi non potest, cum ex adiacenti materia corporis utrumque formetur, et quod insonat auribus et apparet aspectibus et uocis articuli et liniamenta membrorum et audibilis et uisibilis motus, ut et uerum sit corpus, quod sentitur corporis sensu, et nihil sit amplius, quam quod sentitur corporis sensu? anima enim nullo sensu corporis uel in aliquo animante sentitur. non igitur opus est quaerere, quo modo apparuerit columbae species corporalis, sicut non quaerimus, quo modo sonuerint uoces articulati corporis. si enim potuit anima non esse media, ubi uox, non quasi uox, dicitur facta, quanto magis potuit, ubi dicitur columba hoc uerbo significata sola specie corporali oculis reddita non natura uiuentis animantis expressa! hoc modo etiam illud dicitur: Factus est subito de caelo sonus, quasi ferretur flatus uehemens, et uisae sunt illis linguae diuisae uelut ignis, ubi dicitur species quaedam quasi flatus et uelut ignis sensibilis usitatis similis notisque naturis, non ipsae usitatae notaeque naturae ad tempus factae significari uidentur.

### English translation (Claude)

I am surprised that it seems to you that the sound of the voice in which it was said, “You are my Son,” could have been produced in this way, not through the mediation of a soul but by the divine will through bodily nature alone, and yet it does not seem to you that the bodily form of any living creature and motion like that of a living thing could have been produced in the same way by the divine will without any animal spirit placed in between. For if bodily creation obeys God without the ministry of a vivifying soul, so that sounds are produced such as are usually produced by an animate body, and the form of articulate speech is brought to the ears, why should it not obey so that, without the ministry of a vivifying soul, the shape and movement of a bird are presented to the eyes by the same power of the Creator? Or can the sense of hearing deserve this and the sense of sight not, when both are formed from the bodily matter at hand: what sounds in the ears and what appears to the eyes, the articulations of the voice and the outlines of the limbs, audible and visible motion; so that what is perceived by the bodily sense is a true body, and is nothing more than what is perceived by the bodily sense? For a soul is not perceived by any bodily sense, even in any living creature. There is no need, then, to ask how the bodily form of a dove appeared, just as we do not ask how the voices of an articulated body sounded. For if a soul could be absent as intermediary where a voice is said to have been made, not “as it were a voice,” how much more could it be absent where it is said “a dove,” a word signifying only a bodily form presented to the eyes, not the nature of a living animal! In this way too it is said, “Suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a violent wind rushing, and there appeared to them tongues divided as of fire,” where a certain appearance “as of” wind and “as of” fire, perceptible and like familiar and known natures, seems to be signified, not those familiar and known natures themselves made for a time.

### Scripture references

- Mark 1:11: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:2–3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Mark 1:11 (Luke 3:22); Acts 2:2–3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.10 (CSEL 44:618–619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-10).

## Letter 169.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-11
- Source: CSEL 44:619–620
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whether such signs were bodily or spiritual visions, and whether angels mediated them, need not be decided, so long as God's nature is held to be unchangeable.

### Latin text

Si autem subtilior ratio uel excellentior rei uestigatio demonstrat eam naturam, quae nec temporaliter nec localiter mouetur, non moueri nisi per illam, quae temporaliter tantum non localiter moueri potest, consequens erit, ut omnia illa per ministerium creaturae uiuentis effecta sint, sicut per angelos fiunt. unde diligentius disserere et longum est et non necessarium. huc accedit, quia sunt uisiones, quae apparent spiritui tamquam corporis sensibus non solum dormientibus uel furentibus sed aliquando sanae mentis uigilantibus non per fallaciam inludentium daemonum sed per aliquam reuelationem spiritalem, quae fit per formas incorporeas corporibus similes. quae discerni omnino non possunt, nisi diuino adiutorio plenius reuelentur et mentis intellegentia diiudicentur. uix aliquando cum fiunt, sed plerumque postea cum transierint. quae cum ita sint, siue in naturis corporis siue sola specie corporali natura autem spiritali nostro spiritui tamquam sensibus corporis apparere uideantur, quando haec sacra scriptura commemorat, cuius istorum duorum generis sint et utrum mediante uiua creatura fiant, si corpore fiunt, iudicare temere non debemus, dum tamen creatoris, hoc est summae et ineffabilis trinitatis inuisibilem incommutabilemque naturam et a mortalium carnalium sensibus et ab omni conuertibilitate siue in melius siue in deterius siue in quodlibet aliud atque aliud remotam atque discretam uel sine ulla dubitatione credamus uel qualicumque etiam intellegentia capiamus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if a subtler reasoning or a more excellent investigation of the matter shows that the nature that moves neither in time nor in place does not move anything except through that nature which can move in time only, not in place, it will follow that all those things were brought about through the ministry of a living creature, as things are done through angels. To discuss this more carefully would be long and is not necessary. Add to this that there are visions which appear to the spirit as if to the bodily senses, not only to those asleep or raving, but sometimes to those awake and of sound mind, not through the deceit of mocking demons, but through some spiritual revelation that takes place through incorporeal forms like bodies. These cannot be distinguished at all unless they are revealed more fully by divine help and judged by the understanding of the mind; this rarely happens while they are taking place, but mostly afterwards, when they have passed. Since this is so, when Holy Scripture records such things, whether they appear in bodily natures, or only in bodily form but with a spiritual nature, to our spirit as if to the bodily senses, we ought not to judge rashly to which of these two kinds they belong, and whether, if they take place in a body, they are produced through the mediation of a living creature; provided that we either believe without any doubt, or grasp with whatever understanding we can, that the invisible and unchangeable nature of the Creator, that is, of the supreme and ineffable Trinity, is far removed and separated both from the senses of mortal flesh and from all change, whether for better or for worse or into one thing and another.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.11 (CSEL 44:619–620; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-11).

## Letter 169.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-12
- Source: CSEL 44:620
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes his answers to Evodius's two questions, on the Trinity and on the dove.

### Latin text

Haec tibi de duabus quaestionibus, hoc est de trinitate et columba, in qua spiritus sanctus non sua natura sed significatiua specie demonstratus est, sicut et filius dei non sua natiuitate, de qua pater dicit: Ante luciferum genui te, sed in homine suscepto ex utero uirginis a Iudaeis crucifixus est, uideris quam otiose ego tamen occupatissimus scribere potui. nec putaui omnia pertractanda, quae posuisti in litteris tuis; uerum ad illa duo, quae ex me audire uoluisti, me respondisse etsi non sufficienter auiditati tuae tamen caritati oboedienter existimo.

### English translation (Claude)

This is what I have been able to write to you on the two questions, that is, about the Trinity and about the dove, in which the Holy Spirit was shown not in his own nature but in a signifying form, just as the Son of God was crucified by the Jews not in his own birth, of which the Father says, “Before the morning star I begot you,” but in the man taken from the virgin's womb: written, as you see, at leisure, yet by me while extremely busy. Nor did I think it necessary to treat everything you put in your letter; but I think I have answered the two things you wished to hear from me, if not sufficiently for your eagerness, at least obediently to your love.

### Scripture references

- Ps 110:3 (109:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 110:3 (109:3 LXX/Vulgate). “Crucified by the Jews” is Augustine's wording, translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.12 (CSEL 44:620; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-12).

## Letter 169.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-13
- Source: CSEL 44:620–622
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists his recent works: letters to Jerome on the soul and on James, a book for Orosius against the Priscillianists and Origenists, and a book against Pelagius.

### Latin text

Praeter autem illos duos libros, quos tribus me adiunxisse supra commemoraui, et trium psalmorum expositionem scripsi etiam librum ad sanctum presbyterum Hieronymum de animae origine consulens eum, quo modo defendi possit illa sententia. quam religiosae memoriae Marcellino suam esse scripsit, singulas animas nouas nascentibus fieri, ut non labefactetur fundatissima ecclesiae fides, qua inconcusse credimus, quod in Adam omnes moriuntur et, nisi Christi gratia liberentur, quod per suum sacramentum etiam in paruulis operatur, in condemnationem trahuntur. scripsi et alium ad eundem, quo modo illi uideatur accipiendum esse, quod scriptum est in epistula Iacobi: Quicumque autem totam legem seruauerit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus. sed in hoc dixi etiam, quid mihi uideatur, in illo autem de animae origine tantum, quid ei uideatur, consultatoria quadam disputatione quaesiui. occasionem quippe cuiusdam sanctissimi et studiosissimi iuuenis, presbyteri Orosii, qui ad nos ab ultima Hispania, id est ab Oceani litore solo sanctarum scripturarum ardore flammatus aduenit, amittere nolui. cui, ut ad illum quoque pergeret, persuasi. huic etiam ipsi Orosio ad quaedam interrogata, quae illum de Priscillianistarum haeresi et de Origenis quibusdam opinionibus. quas non recipit ecclesia, permouebant, uno libro non grandi quanta potui breuitate et perspicuitate respondi. scripsi etiam grandem quendam librum aduersus Pelagii haeresim cogentibus nonnullis fratribus, quibus contra gratiam Christi opinionem perniciosam ille persuaserat. haec omnia si habere uolueris, aliquem mitte, qui tibi cuncta describat. me autem permitte his uacare quaerendis atque dictandis, quae quoniam multis sunt necessaria, praeponenda esse arbitror ualde ad paucos pertinentibus inquisitionibus tuis.

### English translation (Claude)

Besides the two books I mentioned above as added to the three, and the exposition of three psalms, I have also written a book to the holy presbyter Jerome on the origin of the soul, consulting him on how the opinion he wrote to Marcellinus of religious memory was his own, that new souls are made one for each person born, can be defended without undermining the well-founded faith of the church, by which we believe unshakably that in Adam all die and that, unless they are freed by the grace of Christ, which through his sacrament works even in little ones, they are drawn into condemnation. I wrote another to him also, asking how in his view we should take what is written in the letter of James: “But whoever keeps the whole law but stumbles in one point has become guilty of all.” In this one I also said what I think; but in the one on the origin of the soul I only asked, in a kind of consultative discussion, what he thinks. For I did not want to lose the opportunity offered by a very holy and studious young man, the presbyter Orosius, who came to us from farthest Spain, that is, from the shore of the Ocean, fired only by zeal for the Holy Scriptures. I persuaded him to go on to Jerome too. To this same Orosius, on certain questions that troubled him about the heresy of the Priscillianists and some opinions of Origen that the church does not accept, I replied in one book of no great size, as briefly and clearly as I could. I also wrote a large book against the heresy of Pelagius, at the urging of some brothers whom he had persuaded of an opinion harmful to the grace of Christ. If you want to have all these, send someone to copy them all for you. But allow me to give my time to investigating and dictating these things, which, since they are necessary for many, I think should be preferred to your inquiries, which concern very few.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:10: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Nat. et grat. (On Nature and Grace): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The works are Epp. 166 and 167, To Orosius against the Priscillianists and Origenists, and On Nature and Grace. Quotations: 1 Cor 15:22; Jas 2:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 169.13 (CSEL 44:620–622; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-169-13).

## Letter 170.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-1
- Source: CSEL 44:622–623
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine and Alypius write to Maximus, a convert from Arianism, rejoicing in his conversion but grieved that his household has not followed.

### Latin text

Cum a sancto fratre et coepiscopo nostro Peregrino de tua tuorumque non corporali tantum salute sed spiritali praecipue quaereremus, de tua quidem laetos, de tuorum uero tristes nos eius responsa fecerunt, quod nondum sint ecclesiae catholicae salubri correctione sociati, et, quia id cito futurum sperauimus, adhuc non esse factum multum dolemus, domine eximie meritoque honorabilis et religiose frater.

### English translation (Claude)

When we asked our holy brother and fellow bishop Peregrinus about your health and that of your household, not only bodily but above all spiritual, his answers made us glad about you but sad about your household, because they have not yet been joined to the Catholic Church by a salutary correction; and since we hoped this would soon happen, we grieve much that it has not yet been done, excellent lord, deservedly honorable and devout brother.

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Alypius and Augustine to Maximus, a physician who had come over from the Arians to the Catholic Church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.1 (CSEL 44:622–623; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-1).

## Letter 170.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-2
- Source: CSEL 44:623–624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The worship (latreia) owed to God alone is owed to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, whose temple we are.

### Latin text

Proinde caritatem tuam in domini pace salutantes et praecipimus et rogamus, ut eos, quod didicisti, docere non differas. unum scilicet deum esse solum, cui seruitus illa debetur, quae latria Graeco uocabulo nuncupatur. ipsum enim uerbum est in lege, ubi scriptum est: Dominum deum tuum adorabis et illi soli seruies. quem si deum patrem tantum modo dixerimus, respondebitur nobis: Ergo latria deo filio non debetur, quod nefas est dici. si autem debetur, quo modo ergo uni tantum debetur deo, si et patri debetur et filio, nisi quia unus deus, cui soli per latrian seruire iussi sumus, ita dicitur deus solus, ut et pater intellegatur et filius, immo uero etiam spiritus sanctus? de illo quippe dicit apostolus: Nescitis, quia corpora uestra templum in uobis est spiritus sancti, quem habetis a deo, et non estis uestri? empti enim estis magno pretio. glorificate ergo deum in corpore uestro. quem deum nisi spiritum sanctum, cuius corpora nostra esse dixerat templum? debetur ergo latria spiritui sancto. nam si templum ei facere, sicut Salomon fecit, de lignis et lapidibus iuberemur, utique faciendo templum latrian exhibere conuinceremur; quanto magis latrian debemus, cui templum non facimus, sed sumus!

### English translation (Claude)

So, greeting your love in the peace of the Lord, we both instruct and ask you not to delay in teaching them what you have learned: namely, that there is one only God to whom is owed that service which is called by the Greek word latreia. For that very word is in the law, where it is written: “You shall worship the Lord your God and serve him alone.” If we say this God is only the Father, the answer will come back to us: “Then latreia is not owed to God the Son,” which it is wicked to say. But if it is owed, how then is it owed only to one God, if it is owed both to the Father and to the Son, unless the one God, whom alone we are commanded to serve with latreia, is called the only God in such a way that the Father is understood and the Son, and indeed the Holy Spirit too? For of him the apostle says: “Do you not know that your bodies are a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you were bought at a great price. Therefore glorify God in your body.” What God, if not the Holy Spirit, whose temple he had said our bodies are? Latreia is therefore owed to the Holy Spirit. For if we were commanded to make him a temple of wood and stone, as Solomon did, we would certainly be shown by making the temple to be offering latreia; how much more do we owe latreia to him for whom we do not make a temple, but are one!

### Scripture references

- Deut 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 4:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:19–20: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Kgs 6:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Deut 6:13 (as in Matt 4:10); 1 Cor 6:19–20. Allusion: 1 Kgs 6 (Solomon's temple).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.2 (CSEL 44:623–624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-2).

## Letter 170.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-3
- Source: CSEL 44:624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The one Lord God whom alone we serve is the Trinity itself, the Persons distinct but of one nature.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc, si et patri et filio et spiritui sancto latria debetur et exhibetur a nobis, de qua dictum est: Dominum deum tuum adorabis et illi soli seruies, procul dubio dominus deus noster, cui soli per latrian seruire debemus. non est pater solus nec solus filius nec solus spiritus sanctus sed ipsa trinitas unus deus solus pater et filius et spiritus sanctus, non ut pater sit ipse, qui filius, uel spiritus sanctus ipse sit aut pater aut filius, cum sit in illa trinitate pater filii solius et filius patris solius, spiritus autem sanctus et patris et filii sit spiritus, sed propter unam eandemque naturam atque inseparabilem uitam ipsa trinitas, quantum ab homine potest, fide praecedente intellegitur unus dominus deus noster, de quo dictum est: Dominum deum tuum adorabis et illi soli seruies, et quem praedicans apostolus ait: Quoniam ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia: ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum.

### English translation (Claude)

And so, if latreia, of which it was said, “You shall worship the Lord your God and serve him alone,” is owed and offered by us to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Spirit, then without doubt the Lord our God, whom alone we must serve with latreia, is not the Father alone, nor the Son alone, nor the Holy Spirit alone, but the Trinity itself, one only God, Father and Son and Holy Spirit. This is not so that the Father is the same as the Son, or the Holy Spirit the same as the Father or the Son, since in that Trinity the Father is Father of the Son alone, and the Son is Son of the Father alone, while the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of both Father and Son; but because of one and the same nature and inseparable life, the Trinity itself, as far as a human being can, with faith going before, is understood to be the one Lord our God, of whom it was said, “You shall worship the Lord your God and serve him alone,” and whom the apostle proclaims when he says: “For from him and through him and in him are all things: to him be glory forever and ever.”

### Scripture references

- Deut 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Deut 6:13 (Matt 4:10); Rom 11:36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.3 (CSEL 44:624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-3).

## Letter 170.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-4
- Source: CSEL 44:624–625
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Son is begotten from the Father's substance, coeternal like brightness from flame; the Spirit proceeds and is not made.

### Latin text

Non enim sic est ex deo patre unigenitus filius, quem ad modum ex illo est uniuersa creatura, quam ex nihilo creauit. hunc quippe de sua substantia genuit, non ex nihilo fecit, nec eum ex tempore genuit, per quem cuncta tempora condidit, quoniam, sicut flamma splendorem, quem gignit, tempore non praecedit, ita pater numquam sine filio fuit. ipse est quippe sapientia dei patris, de qua scriptum est: Candor est enim lucis aeternae. luci ergo, cuius candor est, id est deo patri sine dubio coaeterna est et ideo non, sicut in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, ita in principio fecit uerbum, sed in principio erat uerbum. spiritus quoque sanctus non sicut creatura ex nihilo est factus, sed sic a patre procedit, ut nec a filio nec a patre sit factus.

### English translation (Claude)

For the only-begotten Son is not from God the Father in the way that the whole creation is from him, which he created from nothing. Him he begot from his own substance; he did not make him from nothing. Nor did he beget him in time, through whom he founded all times; for just as a flame does not precede in time the brightness it produces, so the Father was never without the Son. For he is the Wisdom of God the Father, of which it is written, “For she is the brightness of eternal light.” So she is without doubt coeternal with the light whose brightness she is, that is, with God the Father; and therefore it is not said that, as “in the beginning God made heaven and earth,” so in the beginning he made the Word, but “in the beginning was the Word.” The Holy Spirit, too, was not made from nothing like a creature, but proceeds from the Father in such a way that he was made neither by the Son nor by the Father.

### Scripture references

- Gen 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:26: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:26 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Wis 7:26 (outside the 66 books); Gen 1:1; John 1:1. Allusion: John 15:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.4 (CSEL 44:624–625; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-4).

## Letter 170.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-5
- Source: CSEL 44:625–626
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Each Person of the Trinity is as great as all three together; they are three yet one God.

### Latin text

Haec trinitas unius est eiusdemque naturae atque substantiae non minor in singulis quam in omnibus nec maior in omnibus quam in singulis sed tanta in solo patre uel in solo filio quanta in patre simul et filio et tanta in solo spiritu sancto quanta simul in patre et filio et spiritu sancto. neque enim pater, ut haberet filium de se ipso, minuit se ipsum, sed ita genuit de se alterum se, ut totus maneret in se et esset in filio tantus, quantus est solus. similiter et spiritus sanctus integer de integro non praecedit, unde procedit, sed tantus cum illo quantus ex illo nec minuit eum procedendo nec auget haerendo. et haec omnia nec confuse unum sunt nec disiuncte tria sunt, sed, cum sint unum, tria sunt et, cum sint tria, unum sunt. proinde, qui tam multis cordibus fidelium suorum donauit, ut esset cor unum, quanto magis conseruat in se ipso, ut sint haec tria et singula deus et simul omnia non tres dii sed unus deus! hic est dominus deus noster, cui uniuersa pietate seruitur, cui soli latria illa debetur.

### English translation (Claude)

This Trinity is of one and the same nature and substance, not less in each than in all, nor greater in all than in each, but as great in the Father alone or in the Son alone as in the Father and Son together, and as great in the Holy Spirit alone as in the Father and Son and Holy Spirit together. For the Father did not diminish himself in order to have a Son from himself, but so begot from himself another self that he remained whole in himself and was in the Son as great as he is alone. Likewise the Holy Spirit, whole from whole, does not precede him from whom he proceeds, but is as great with him as from him; he neither diminishes him by proceeding nor increases him by cleaving to him. And all these are neither one in confusion nor three in separation; but while they are one they are three, and while they are three they are one. Therefore he who granted to so many hearts of his faithful that they should be one heart, how much more does he keep in himself that these three, each of them God, are all together not three gods but one God! This is the Lord our God, who is served with all piety, to whom alone that latreia is owed.

### Scripture references

- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Acts 4:32 (“one heart”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.5 (CSEL 44:625–626; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-5).

## Letter 170.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-6
- Source: CSEL 44:626–627
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Father and Son are relative names, not names of nature, so the Arian argument that the Son is of a different nature fails.

### Latin text

Qui cum rebus, quae nascuntur in tempore, sua bonitate tribuerit, ut suae substantiae prolem quaeque res gignat, uide quam impie dicatur ipse non genuisse id, quod est ipse, cum homo ex eius dono id generet, quod est ipse, id est hominem non alterius naturae sed eius, cuius est ipse, quamuis non patrem filii sui generet, quod est ipse. haec enim propinquitatis sunt nomina non naturae et ideo ad aliquid dicta uel relatiua dicuntur, quae aliquando eadem sunt aliquando diuersa. eadem scilicet cum frater refertur ad fratrem, amicus ad amicum, uicinus ad uicinum, cognatus ad cognatum et si qua similia, quae infinitum est omnia uelle percurrere. in his enim, quod est iste ad illum, hoc est ille ad istum. diuersa sunt autem sicut pater ad filium, filius ad patrem, socer ad generum, gener ad socerum, dominus ad seruum, seruus ad dominum. non est quidem hoc iste ad illum, quod ille ad istum, sed ambo tamen homines sunt. relatio diuersa est non natura, quoniam, si adtendas, quid sit alter ad alterum, non est hoc ad illum iste, quod ad istum ille, quia iste pater est ille filius aut iste socer ille gener aut iste dominus ille seruus; si autem adtendas, quid quisque sit ad se ipsum uel in se ipso, hoc est iste, quod ille, quia et ille homo est sicut iste. unde intellegit prudentia tua non ab eis rationabiliter dici, a quorum errore te dominus liberauit, ideo dei patris et dei filii naturam esse diuersam, quia iste pater est ille filius, et ideo patrem non genuisse id, quod est ipse, quia non genuit patrem filii sui, quod est ad illum ipse. quis enim non uideat ista uocabula non in se ipsis demonstrare naturas, sed alterius ad alterum significare personas?

### English translation (Claude)

Since by his goodness he has granted to things born in time that each should beget offspring of its own substance, see how impious it is to say that he himself did not beget what he himself is, when a man by his gift begets what he himself is, that is, a man, not of another nature but of that of which he himself is, although he does not beget the father of his own son, which is what he himself is. For these are names of relationship, not of nature, and so they are called “toward something,” or relative terms, which are sometimes the same and sometimes different. The same, when brother is referred to brother, friend to friend, neighbor to neighbor, kinsman to kinsman, and the like, which it would be endless to go through. For in these, what this one is to that one, that one is to this one. But they are different, as father to son, son to father, father-in-law to son-in-law, son-in-law to father-in-law, master to slave, slave to master. This one is not to that one what that one is to this one, yet both are men. The relation is different, not the nature: for if you consider what one is to the other, this one is not to that one what that one is to this one, because this one is father, that one son, or this one father-in-law, that one son-in-law, or this one master, that one slave; but if you consider what each is with respect to himself or in himself, this one is what that one is, because that one is a man as this one is. Hence your prudence understands that those from whose error the Lord has freed you do not argue reasonably that the nature of God the Father and of God the Son is different because the one is Father and the other Son, and that therefore the Father did not beget what he himself is, because he did not beget the father of his son, which is what he is in relation to him. For who does not see that these names do not show natures in themselves but signify persons in relation to one another?

### Translation notes

- Augustine argues against the Arian position from which Maximus had converted; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.6 (CSEL 44:626–627; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-6).

## Letter 170.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-7
- Source: CSEL 44:627–628
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Being from the Father concerns origin, not nature, as Abel was from Adam yet both were men.

### Latin text

Tale est etiam illud, quod simili loquuntur errore, ideo filium alterius esse naturae diuersaeque substantiae, quia pater deus non est de altero deo, filius autem deus est quidem sed de patre deo. et hic enim non indicatur substantia sed origo, id est non quod sit, sed unde sit quisque uel non sit. neque enim Abel et Adam ideo non unius naturae atque substantiae fuerunt, quia iste fuit homo de homine illo, ille de nullo. si ergo utriusque natura quaeratur, homo Abel homo Adam, si autem origo, primus homo ex quo Abel, nullus homo ex quo Adam. ita in deo patre et deo filio si utriusque natura quaeratur, uterque deus nec magis alter altero deus; si autem origo, pater est deus de quo filius deus, de quo autem pater nullus est deus.

### English translation (Claude)

Of the same kind is what they say with a similar error, that the Son is of another nature and a different substance because God the Father is not from another God, while the Son is indeed God, but from God the Father. For here too what is indicated is not substance but origin, that is, not what each is, but from whom each is or is not. For Abel and Adam were not therefore not of one nature and substance because the one was a man from that man, the other from no one. So if the nature of each is asked, Abel is a man, Adam is a man; but if the origin, the first man is the one from whom Abel came, and no man is the one from whom Adam came. So in God the Father and God the Son, if the nature of each is asked, each is God, and neither is more God than the other; but if the origin, the Father is the God from whom the Son is God, but there is no God from whom the Father is.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.7 (CSEL 44:627–628; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-7).

## Letter 170.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-8
- Source: CSEL 44:628–629
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God begot the Son without passion and as his equal from eternity; the Son's equality is by nature, not robbery.

### Latin text

Frustra itaque ad hoc respondere conantes dicunt: Sed homo cum passione generat, deus autem sine passione genuit filium. hoc enim non solum ipsos nihil sed nos adiuuat plurimum. nam si temporalibus et passibilibus rebus deus tribuit, ut, quod sunt, hoc generent, quanto magis ipse aeternus et inpassibilis non aliud, quam est ipse, generauit unus unicum ideo nostra magna admiratione, quoniam sua nulla passione et tanta secum aequalitate, ut eum nec potestate praecederet nec aetate! sed ideo totum, quod habet et quod potest, non tribuit sibi sed patri, quia non est a se ipso sed a patre. aequalis enim est patri, sed hoc quoque accepit a patre nec sic accepit, ut esset aequalis, quasi prius fuerit inaequalis, sed natus aequalis, sicut semper natus ita semper aequalis. non itaque inaequalem genuit et aequalitatem iam nato addidit, sed gignendo eam dedit, quia aequalem non inparem genuit. ideo in forma dei esse aequalem deo non ei rapina fuerat sed natura, quoniam id nascendo sumpsit, non superbiendo praesumpsit.

### English translation (Claude)

In vain, then, do they try to answer this by saying: “But a man begets with passion, while God begot the Son without passion.” This not only does nothing for them but helps us very much. For if God granted to temporal and passible things that they should beget what they are, how much more did he himself, eternal and impassible, beget nothing other than what he himself is, the one begetting the only one, to our great wonder, since with no passion of his own, and with such equality to himself that he preceded him neither in power nor in age! But the Son attributes all that he has and all that he can do not to himself but to the Father, because he is not from himself but from the Father. For he is equal to the Father, but this too he received from the Father; and he did not receive it so as to become equal, as though he had first been unequal, but was born equal; as he was always born, so he was always equal. So the Father did not beget him unequal and then add equality to him once born, but gave it in begetting him, because he begot an equal, not an inferior. Therefore to be in the form of God equal to God was not robbery for him but nature, since he took it by being born, not by presuming in pride.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Phil 2:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.8 (CSEL 44:628–629; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-8).

## Letter 170.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-9
- Source: CSEL 44:629–630
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ is less than the Father in the form of a servant and equal to him in the form of God.

### Latin text

Propterea uero patrem dicit esse maiorem, quia semet ipsum exinaniuit formam serui accipiens non amittens dei. propter quam serui formam non tantum patre uerum etiam se ipso et spiritu sancto minor factus est nec tantum hac excellentissima trinitate sed etiam minoratus est paulo minus ab angelis. hominibus quoque minor fuit, quando puer parentibus subditus fuit. propter hanc itaque formam serui, quam ueniente plenitudine temporis exinanitus accepit, dixit: Pater maior me est; propter illam uero dei formam, quam nec exinanitus amisit, dixit: Ego et pater unum sumus et homo scilicet factus et permanens deus; homo enim adsumptus est a deo, non in homine consumptus est deus. ideo ualde rationabiliter et patre minor est homo Christus et patri aequalis est idem ipse deus Christus.

### English translation (Claude)

But he says the Father is greater because he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, not losing the form of God. On account of this form of a servant he was made less not only than the Father but also than himself and the Holy Spirit; and not only than this most excellent Trinity, but he was also made a little lower than the angels. He was also less than men, when as a boy he was subject to his parents. So on account of this form of a servant, which, emptied, he received when the fullness of time came, he said, “The Father is greater than I”; but on account of that form of God, which even when emptied he did not lose, he said, “I and the Father are one”: made man, that is, and remaining God; for man was taken up by God, God was not consumed in man. Therefore, very reasonably, Christ as man is less than the Father, and the same Christ as God is equal to the Father.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 2:51: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- John 14:28: quotation, high confidence
- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Phil 2:7; Heb 2:7, 9 (Ps 8:5); Luke 2:51; Gal 4:4; John 14:28; John 10:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.9 (CSEL 44:629–630; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-9).

## Letter 170.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-10
- Source: CSEL 44:630–631
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Maximus to bring his household with him into the Catholic Church.

### Latin text

Cum igitur huic rectae atque catholicae fidei praesentibus nobis cum magna exultatione populi dei consociatum te esse gaudeamus, quare adhuc de tuorum segnitia tristes sumus? obsecramus te per misericordiam Christi, ut ipso adiuuante auferas istum maerorem de cordibus nostris. neque enim credendum est auctoritatem tuam ad peruersitatem tuorum plurimum ualere potuisse et ad correctionem ualere nihil. an forte contemnunt te, quia in ecclesiae catholicae participationem hac aetate uenisti, cum te amplius debeant admirari atque uenerari, quia uetustissimum errorem senili quadam iuuentute uicisti? absit, ut tibi resistant uera dicenti, cui consenserunt a ueritate deuianti; absit, ut nolint tecum recta sentire, cum quo eos delectauit errare. tu tantum et ora pro eis et insta eis, immo uero adduc eos in domum dei tecum, quia in tua domo sunt tecum. uel te pudeat uel pigeat in domum dei cum illis non uenire, qui in domum tuam soliti fuerant conuenire, praesertim quoniam catholica mater aliquos a te petit, aliquos repetit. petit eos, quos apud te inuenit, repetit eos, quos per te perdidit. non excrucietur damnis, sed potius laetetur et lucris. adquirat filios, quos non habuit, non plangat, quos habuit. oramus ad deum, ut facias, quod hortamur, et speramus de misericordia eius, quod litteris sancti fratris et coepiscopi nostri Peregrini et rescriptis dilectionis tuae cito de hac re gaudio replebitur cor nostrum et lingua nostra exultatione.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, we rejoice that you have been joined to this right and Catholic faith in our presence, to the great exultation of God's people, why are we still sad about the sluggishness of your household? We implore you by the mercy of Christ that, with his help, you remove this grief from our hearts. For it is not to be believed that your authority could have had great weight in leading your household astray and has none in correcting them. Or do they perhaps despise you because you have come into the communion of the Catholic Church at this age, when they ought rather to admire and revere you the more, because with a kind of youth in old age you have overcome a very old error? God forbid that they should resist you when you speak the truth, who agreed with you when you strayed from the truth; God forbid that they should refuse to think rightly with you, with whom they delighted to err. Only pray for them and press them; or rather, bring them with you into the house of God, since they are with you in your house. Let it shame or grieve you not to come into the house of God with those who were accustomed to gather in your house, especially since the Catholic mother asks some of you and asks back others: she asks for those she found with you, and asks back those she lost through you. Let her not be tormented by losses, but rather rejoice in gains. Let her acquire sons she did not have, and not mourn those she had. We pray to God that you may do what we urge, and we hope from his mercy that by letters from our holy brother and fellow bishop Peregrinus, and by the reply of your love, our heart will soon be filled with joy over this, and our tongue with exultation.

### Scripture references

- Ps 126:2 (125:2 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Ps 126:2 (125:2 LXX/Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 170.10 (CSEL 44:630–631; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/169-1/#p-170-10).

## Letter 171.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-171-1
- Source: CSEL 44:631–632
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine and Alypius ask Peregrinus to report on Maximus's response and explain the format of their long letter.

### Latin text

Ad honorabilem fratrem nostrum Maximum litteras dedimus credentes eum gratanter eas sumpturum. utrum tamen aliquid profecerimus, proxima occasione, quam reperire potueris, dignare rescribere. sciat sane prolixas epistulas ad familiarissimos nostros non solum laicos uerum etiam episcopos sic, quo modo ista scripta est, ad eos scribere nos solere, ut et cito scribantur et charta teneatur commodius, cum leguntur, ne forte istum morem nostrum nesciens factam sibi arbitretur iniuriam.

### English translation (Claude)

We have given a letter to our honorable brother Maximus, believing that he will receive it gladly. Please write back at the next opportunity you can find whether we have achieved anything. Let him know, of course, that we are accustomed to write long letters to our closest friends, not only laymen but also bishops, in the way this one is written, so that they may be written quickly and the sheet held more conveniently when read; lest perhaps, not knowing this custom of ours, he should think an insult has been done him.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Bishop Peregrinus, who carried Ep. 170 to Maximus. The remark about the format seems to concern the way the letter was laid out on the sheet; the exact sense is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 171.1 (CSEL 44:631–632; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-171-1).

## Letter 172.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-172-1
- Source: CSEL 44:636–638
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome tells Augustine he cannot yet answer his two books (Epp. 166–167) because of troubled times, assures him of his love, and urges joint action against Pelagianism.

### Latin text

Virum honorabilem fratrem meum filium dignationis tuae Orosium presbyterum et sui merito et te iubente suscepi. sed incidit tempus difficillimum, quando mihi tacere melius fuit quam loqui, ita ut nostra studia cessarent et iuxta Appium canina exerceretur facundia. itaque duobus libellis tuis. quos meo nomini dedicasti, eruditissimis et omni eloquentiae splendore fulgentibus ad tempus respondere non potui, non quo quicquam in illis reprehendendum putem, sed quia iuxta beatum apostolum unusquisque in suo sensu abundet alius quidem sic alius autem sic. certe quicquid dici potuit et tam sublimi ingenio de scripturarum sanctarum hauriri fontibus, a te positum atque dissertum est. sed quaeso reuerentiam tuam, parumper patiaris me tuum laudare ingenium. nos enim inter nos eruditionis causa disserimus. ceterum aemuli et maxime haeretici, si diuersas inter nos sententias uiderint, de animi calumniabuntur rancore descendere. mihi autem decretum est te amare, suscipere, colere, mirari tuaque dicta quasi mea defendere. certe et in dialogo, quem nuper edidi, beatitudinis tuae, ut dignum fuerat, recordatus sum magisque demus operam, ut perniciosissima haeresis de ecclesiis auferatur. quae semper simulat paenitentiam, ut docendi in ecclesiis habeat facultatem, ne, si aperta se luce prodiderit, foras expulsa moriatur.

### English translation (Claude)

I received that honorable man, my brother, the son of Your Worthiness, the presbyter Orosius, both for his own merit and at your bidding. But a most difficult time has befallen us, when it was better for me to be silent than to speak, so that our studies ceased and, in Appius's phrase, a dog's eloquence was being exercised. So I have not been able for the time being to answer your two little books dedicated to my name, most learned and shining with every splendor of eloquence; not that I think anything in them deserves blame, but because, as the blessed apostle says, let each be fully persuaded in his own mind, one in this way, another in that. Certainly whatever could be said and drawn by so lofty a mind from the springs of the Holy Scriptures has been set down and discussed by you. But I ask Your Reverence to allow me for a little while to praise your genius. For we discuss things between ourselves for the sake of learning; but rivals, and above all heretics, if they see differing opinions between us, will slander us as acting from rancor of mind. For my part, I have resolved to love you, to receive you, to cherish you, to admire you, and to defend your words as my own. Indeed, in the dialogue I recently published I remembered Your Blessedness, as was fitting; and let us rather work so that a most pernicious heresy may be removed from the churches, one that always feigns repentance in order to have the opportunity of teaching in the churches, lest, if it showed itself in open light, it should be driven out and die.

### Scripture references

- Rom 14:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 3:7: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Written by Jerome to Augustine. “Appius”: the phrase “a dog's eloquence” goes back to Appius Claudius as quoted by Sallust (Histories, fragment); the exact source is uncertain.
- The dialogue is Jerome's Dialogue against the Pelagians. The “most difficult time” refers to the troubles in Palestine over Pelagius.
- Quotation: Rom 14:5; 1 Cor 7:7. Echo: Eccl 3:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 172.1 (CSEL 44:636–638; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-172-1).

## Letter 172.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-172-2
- Source: CSEL 44:638–640
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome sends greetings from Eustochium and Paula and explains that he cannot supply his edition of the Septuagint for lack of Latin copyists.

### Latin text

Sanctae et uenerabiles filiae tuae, Eustochium et Paula, et genere suo et exhortatione tua digne gradiuntur specialiterque salutant beatitudinem tuam, omnis quoque fraternitas, quae nobiscum domino saluatori seruire conantur. sanctum presbyterum Firmum anno praeterito ob rem earum Rauennam et inde Africam Siciliamque direximus, quem putamus iam in Africae partibus commorari. sanctos tuo adhaerentes lateri ut meo obsequio salutes, precor. litteras quoque meas ad sanctum presbyterum Firmum direxi; quae si ad te uenerint, ei dirigere non graueris. incolumem te et mei memorem Christus dominus custodiat, domine uere sancte et beatissime papa. Grandem latini sermonis in ista prouincia notariorum patimur penuriam et idcirco praeceptis tuis parere non possumus maxime in editione Septuaginta, quae asteriscis ueribusque distincta est; pleraque enim prioris laboris ob fraudem cuiusdam amisimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Your holy and venerable daughters Eustochium and Paula walk worthily of their family and of your exhortation, and they send special greetings to Your Blessedness, as does the whole brotherhood who try with us to serve the Lord our Savior. Last year we sent the holy presbyter Firmus on their business to Ravenna and from there to Africa and Sicily; we think he is now staying in the regions of Africa. I beg you to greet with my respects the saints who cling to your side. I have also sent a letter to the holy presbyter Firmus; if it comes to you, please do not mind forwarding it to him. May Christ the Lord keep you safe and mindful of me, truly holy lord and most blessed father. We suffer a great shortage of Latin secretaries in this province, and so we cannot obey your instructions, especially in the edition of the Septuagint, which is marked with asterisks and obeli; for we have lost most of our earlier work through someone's fraud.

### Translation notes

- Jerome's Latin revision of the Septuagint with Origen's critical signs (asterisks and obeli).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 172.2 (CSEL 44:638–640; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-172-2).

## Letter 173.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-1
- Source: CSEL 44:640
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Donatus, a Donatist presbyter forcibly brought in, telling him his injuries were self-inflicted and that he is being drawn to salvation.

### Latin text

Si posses uidere dolorem cordis mei et sollicitudinem pro salute tua, fortasse miserereris animae tuae placens deo in audiendo uerbo non nostro sed ipsius nec eius scripturas sic in memoria tua figeres, ut contra eas cor clauderes. displicet tibi, quia traheris ad salutem, cum tam multos nostros ad perniciem traxeritis. quid enim uolumus, nisi te comprehendi et praesentari et seruari, ne pereas? quod autem aliquantum in corpore laesus es, ipse tibi fecisti, qui iumento tibi mox admoto uti noluisti et te ad terram grauiter conlisisti. nam utique alius, qui adductus est tecum, collega tuus inlaesus uenit, quia talia sibi ipse non fecit.

### English translation (Claude)

If you could see the grief of my heart and my concern for your salvation, perhaps you would have pity on your own soul, pleasing God by listening to the word, not ours but his, and you would not fix his Scriptures in your memory in such a way as to close your heart against them. It displeases you that you are being drawn to salvation, although you have drawn so many of ours to destruction. For what do we want, except that you be apprehended, brought before the authorities, and kept safe, so that you may not perish? As for having been somewhat injured in body, you did it to yourself, since you refused to use the mount that was promptly brought to you and threw yourself heavily to the ground. For certainly the other man who was brought with you, your colleague, arrived unhurt, because he did no such thing to himself.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Donatus, a Donatist presbyter (of Mutugenna, 173.7), who had been arrested and had tried to harm himself. On the coercion of Donatists the letter is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.1 (CSEL 44:640; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-1).

## Letter 173.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-2
- Source: CSEL 44:640–641
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As men are compelled to become bishops, so those in error may be compelled toward good, though salvation requires a good will.

### Latin text

Sed neque hoc putas tibi fieri debuisse, quia neminem aestimas cogendum esse ad bonum. adtende, quid apostolus dixerit: Qui episcopatum desiderat, bonum opus concupiscit, et tamen tam multi, ut episcopatum suscipiant, tenentur inuiti, perducuntur, includuntur, custodiuntur, patiuntur tanta, quae nolunt, donec eis adsit uoluntas suscipiendi operis boni; quanto magis uos ab errore pernicioso, in quo uobis inimici estis, trahendi estis et perducendi ad ueritatem uel cognoscendam uel eligendam, non solum ut honorem salubriter habeatis, sed etiam ne pessime pereatis! dicis deum dedisse liberum arbitrium, ideo non debere cogi hominem nec ad bonum. quare ergo illi, de quibus supra dixi, coguntur ad bonum? adtende ergo, quod considerare non uis. ideo uoluntas bona misericorditer inpenditur, ut mala uoluntas hominis dirigatur. nam quis nesciat nec damnari hominem nisi merito malae uoluntatis nec liberari, nisi bonam habuerit uoluntatem? non tamen ideo, qui diliguntur, malae suae uoluntati impune et crudeliter permittendi sunt, sed, ubi potestas datur, et a malo prohibendi et ad bonum cogendi.

### English translation (Claude)

But you do not think even this should have been done to you, because you consider that no one should be compelled to what is good. Notice what the apostle said: “Whoever desires the office of bishop desires a good work”; and yet so many, in order to make them accept the office of bishop, are held against their will, led off, shut in, guarded, and suffer many things they do not want, until the will to undertake the good work comes to them. How much more must you be drawn from a pernicious error, in which you are enemies to yourselves, and led to the truth, either to know it or to choose it, not only that you may hold your honor in a way that brings salvation, but also that you may not perish miserably! You say that God has given free choice, and so a man ought not to be compelled even to good. Why then are those I mentioned above compelled to good? Pay attention, then, to what you refuse to consider. A good will is mercifully exerted for this purpose, that a man's bad will may be set right. For who does not know that a man is neither condemned except on the merit of a bad will, nor set free unless he has a good will? Yet those who are loved are not therefore to be abandoned, cruelly and with impunity, to their bad will; rather, where the power is given, they are both to be restrained from evil and compelled to good.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 3:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Tim 3:1. Augustine's defense of compulsion against the Donatists is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.2 (CSEL 44:640–641; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-2).

## Letter 173.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-3
- Source: CSEL 44:641–642
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Examples from Israel, Paul's conversion, fatherly discipline, and the shepherds of Ezekiel justify restraining a bad will.

### Latin text

Nam si uoluntas mala semper suae permittenda est libertati, quare Israhelitae recusantes et murmurantes tam duris flagellis a malo prohibebantur et ad terram promissionis compellebantur? si uoluntas mala semper suae permittenda est libertati, quare Paulus non est permissus uti pessima uoluntate, qua persequebatur ecclesiam, sed prostratus est, ut excaecaretur, excaecatus, ut mutaretur, mutatus, ut mitteretur, missus, ut, qualia fecerat in errore, talia pro ueritate pateretur? si uoluntas mala semper suae permittenda est libertati, quare monetur pater in scripturis sanctis filium durum non solum uerbis corripere sed etiam latera eius tundere, ut ad bonam disciplinam coactus et domitus dirigatur? unde idem dicit: Tu quidem percutis eum uirga, animam autem eius liberabis a morte. si mala uoluntas semper suae permittenda est libertati. quare corripiuntur neglegentes pastores et dicitur eis: Errantem ouem non reuocastis, perditam non inquisistis? et uos oues Christi estis; characterem dominicum portatis in sacramento, quod accepistis, sed errastis et peristis. non ideo uobis displiceamus, quia reuocamus errantes et quaerimus perditos; melius enim facimus uoluntatem domini monentis. ut uos ad eius ouile redire cogamus, quam consentimus uoluntati ouium errantium, ut perire uos permittamus. noli ergo iam dicere, quod te assidue audio dicere: Sic uolo errare. sic uolo perire; melius enim nos hoc omnino non permittimus. quantum possumus.

### English translation (Claude)

For if a bad will must always be left to its freedom, why were the Israelites, when they refused and grumbled, restrained from evil by such harsh scourges and driven on to the promised land? If a bad will must always be left to its freedom, why was Paul not allowed to use the very bad will by which he persecuted the church, but was struck down to be blinded, blinded to be changed, changed to be sent, sent to suffer for the truth such things as he had done in error? If a bad will must always be left to its freedom, why is a father warned in the Holy Scriptures not only to rebuke a stubborn son with words but also to beat his sides, so that, compelled and tamed, he may be directed to good discipline? Hence the same Scripture says: “You strike him with the rod, but you will deliver his soul from death.” If a bad will must always be left to its freedom, why are negligent shepherds rebuked and told, “You have not brought back the straying sheep, you have not sought the lost”? You too are Christ's sheep; you bear the Lord's mark in the sacrament you received; but you have strayed and are lost. Let us not displease you because we bring back the straying and seek the lost; for we do better to do the will of the Lord, who warns us to compel you to return to his fold, than to consent to the will of straying sheep so as to let you perish. So do not say any more what I hear you constantly saying: “I want to stray like this, I want to perish like this.” It is better that we do not allow this at all, as far as we can.

### Scripture references

- Num 14:1–4: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 9:3–9: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 23:14: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 34:4: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 30:12 (Sirach): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Num 14 and the wilderness narratives; Acts 9:3–9; Sir 30:12 (beating the son's sides; outside the 66 books). Quotations: Prov 23:14; Ezek 34:4. The “Lord's mark” is baptism, which Augustine held the Donatists validly possessed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.3 (CSEL 44:641–642; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-3).

## Letter 173.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-4
- Source: CSEL 44:642–643
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Donatus's attempt to drown himself was free but destructive; rescuing him against his will was an act of love, and suicide is never permitted.

### Latin text

Modo quod te in puteum, ut morereris, misisti, utique libera uoluntate fecisti. sed quam crudeles essent serui dei. si huic malae tuae uoluntati te permitterent et non te de illa morte liberarent! quis eos non merito culparet? quis non impios recte iudicaret? et tamen tu te uolens in aquam misisti, ut morereris, illi te nolentem de aqua leuauerunt, ne morereris; tu fecisti secundum uoluntatem tuam sed in perniciem tuam, illi contra uoluntatem tuam sed propter salutem tuam. si ergo salus ista corporalis sic custodienda est, ut etiam in nolentibus ab eis, qui eos diligunt, seruetur, quanto magis illa spiritalis, in cuius desertione mors aeterna metuitur! quamquam in ista morte, quam tibi tu ipse inferre uoluisti, non solum ad tempus sed etiam in aeternum morereris, quia, etsi non ad salutem, non ad ecclesiae pacem, non ad Christi corporis unitatem, non ad sanctam et indiuiduam caritatem sed ad mala aliqua cogereris, nec sic tibi ipse mortem inferre debuisti.

### English translation (Claude)

Just now, when you threw yourself into a well in order to die, you certainly did it by free will. But how cruel the servants of God would be if they left you to this bad will of yours and did not deliver you from that death! Who would not rightly blame them? Who would not rightly judge them wicked? And yet you threw yourself willingly into the water in order to die; they lifted you out of the water against your will, so that you would not die. You acted according to your will, but to your destruction; they acted against your will, but for your safety. If, then, this bodily safety is to be guarded so that it is preserved even in the unwilling by those who love them, how much more that spiritual safety, in the desertion of which eternal death is feared! And yet in that death which you wished to inflict on yourself you would have died not only for a time but forever, because even if you were being compelled not to salvation, not to the peace of the church, not to the unity of the body of Christ, not to holy and undivided love, but to some evils, not even so ought you to have inflicted death on yourself.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.4 (CSEL 44:642–643; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-4).

## Letter 173.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-5
- Source: CSEL 44:643–644
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 1 Cor 13:3 does not commend suicide but the choice to suffer rather than do evil, as the three young men in Daniel did.

### Latin text

Considera scripturas diuinas et discute, quantum potes, et uide, utrum hoc fecerit aliquis aliquando iustorum atque fidelium, cum ab eis tanta mala perpessi sint, qui eos ad aeternum interitum non ad uitam aeternam, quo tu compelleris, adigebant. audiui, quod dixeris apostolum Paulum significasse hoc fieri debere, ubi ait: Et si tradidero corpus meum, ut ardeam. quia uidelicet omnia bona dicebat, quae sine caritate nihil prosunt, sicut sunt linguae hominum et angelorum et omnia sacramenta et omnis scientia et omnis prophetia et omnis fides ita, ut montes transferantur, et rerum suarum distributio pauperibus, ideo uidetur tibi etiam hoc inter bona numerasse, ut sibi quisque inferat mortem. sed adtende diligenter et cognosce, quem ad modum dicat scriptura, quod tradat quisque suum corpus, ut ardeat, non utique, ut ipse se in ignem mittat, quando persequentem patitur inimicum. sed, quando ei proponitur, ut aut mali aliquid faciat aut mali aliquid patiatur, eligat non facere mala quam non pati mala atque ita corpus suum tradat in potestatem interfectoris, sicut tres illi uiri fecerunt, qui auream statuam cogebantur adorare et, nisi facerent, minabatur eis ille, qui cogebat. caminum ignis ardentem. idolum adorare noluerunt, non ipsi se in ignem miserunt et tamen etiam de illis scriptum est. quod tradiderunt corpora sua, ut neque seruirent neque adorarent ullum deum sed deum suum. ecce quo modo dixit apostolus: Si tradidero corpus meum, ut ardeam.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider the divine Scriptures and examine them as far as you can, and see whether any of the righteous and faithful ever did this, though they suffered such evils from those who were driving them to eternal destruction, not to eternal life, to which you are being compelled. I have heard that you said the apostle Paul indicated that this should be done, where he says, “And if I hand over my body to be burned”: namely, since he was listing all the good things that profit nothing without love, such as the tongues of men and angels, all mysteries, all knowledge, all prophecy, and all faith so as to move mountains, and the distribution of one's goods to the poor, it seems to you that he also counted among good things that a person should inflict death on himself. But pay careful attention and learn in what sense Scripture says that someone hands over his body to be burned: certainly not that he throws himself into the fire when he suffers a persecuting enemy, but that, when he is offered the choice either to do some evil or to suffer some evil, he chooses not to do evil rather than not to suffer evil, and so hands over his body into the power of the killer, as those three men did who were being compelled to worship the golden statue, and whom the one compelling them threatened with the burning fiery furnace if they did not. They refused to worship the idol; they did not throw themselves into the fire; and yet of them too it is written that they handed over their bodies so as not to serve or worship any god but their own God. See in what sense the apostle said, “If I hand over my body to be burned.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:1–3: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 3:1–23: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 13:3 (with 13:1–2); Dan 3:28 (3:95 LXX numbering of the Greek additions). Allusion: Dan 3:1–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.5 (CSEL 44:643–644; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-5).

## Letter 173.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-6
- Source: CSEL 44:644–645
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Outside the church's unity and love, even martyrdom by fire profits nothing.

### Latin text

Quod autem sequitur, uide: Si caritatem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest. ad istam caritatem uocaris, ab ista caritate perire non sineris et putas tibi aliquid prodesse, si te ipse praecipites in interitum, cum tibi nihil prodesset, etiamsi alter te occideret caritatis inimicum. foris autem ab ecclesia constitutus et separatus a compage unitatis et uinculo caritatis aeterno supplicio punireris. etiamsi pro Christi nomine uiuus incendereris. hoc est enim. quod ait apostolus: Et si tradidero corpus meum. ut ardeam, caritatem autem non habeam. nihil mihi prodest. reuoca ergo animum ad sanam considerationem et sobriam cogitationem; adtende diligenter, utrum ad errorem et impietatem uoceris, et patere pro ueritate quaslibet molestias. si autem tu potius in errore atque in impietate uersaris, quo autem uocaris, ibi est ueritas et pietas, quia ibi Christiana unitas et sancti spiritus caritas, quid adhuc tibi esse conaris inimicus?

### English translation (Claude)

But see what follows: “If I do not have love, it profits me nothing.” You are being called to this love; you are not allowed to perish from this love; and do you think it would profit you anything to throw yourself headlong into destruction, when it would profit you nothing even if another killed you as an enemy of love? Placed outside the church and separated from the structure of unity and the bond of love, you would be punished with eternal punishment even if you were burned alive for the name of Christ. For this is what the apostle says: “And if I hand over my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.” So call your mind back to sound consideration and sober thought; look carefully whether you are being called to error and impiety, and if so, suffer any hardships for the truth. But if it is rather you who are in error and impiety, and where you are being called there is truth and piety, because there is Christian unity and the love of the Holy Spirit, why do you still try to be your own enemy?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Cor 13:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.6 (CSEL 44:644–645; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-6).

## Letter 173.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-7
- Source: CSEL 44:645–646
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine turns the Donatist bishops' maxim at the Conference of Carthage (411), “neither case nor person prejudices another,” against Donatus.

### Latin text

Ideo praestitit misericordia dei, ut et nos et episcopi uestri tam frequenti numerosoque conuentu Carthaginem ueniremus atque inter nos de ipsa dissensione ordinatissime conferremus. gesta conscripta sunt, nostrae etiam subscriptiones tenentur. lege uel patere. ut tibi legatur, et tunc elige, quod uolueris. audiui, quod dixeris posse te nobiscum de ipsis gestis aliquid agere, si omittamus uerba episcoporum uestrorum, ubi dixerunt: Nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat. haec uerba uis omittamus, ubi per eos nescientes ueritas ipsa locuta est. sed tu dicturus es hic eos errasse et in falsam sententiam incautius cecidisse; nos autem dicimus hoc eos uerum dixisse et hoc per te ipsum facillime probamus. si enim episcopi uestri electi ab uniuersa parte Donati, qui causam omnium sustinerent et, si quid egissent, gratum et acceptum ceteri haberent, tamen in eo, quod illos temere et non recte dixisse arbitraris, non uis ut tibi praeiudicent, uerum ergo dixerunt, quia nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat. et ibi debes agnoscere, quia, si persona tot episcoporum tuorum in illis septem constitutorum non uis ut praeiudicet personae Donati Mutugennensis presbyteri, quanto minus non debet praeiudicare Caeciliani persona, etiamsi mali aliquid in illo esset inuentum, uniuersae unitati Christi, quae non in una uilla Mutugenna concluditur, sed toto terrarum orbe diffunditur!

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason the mercy of God granted that both we and your bishops should come to Carthage in so frequent and numerous an assembly and confer among ourselves about this very dissension in the most orderly manner. The proceedings were written down; our signatures too are on record. Read them, or allow them to be read to you, and then choose what you will. I have heard that you said you could discuss those proceedings with us if we left out the words of your bishops where they said: “Neither does case prejudice case, nor person prejudice person.” You want us to leave out these words, in which, without their knowing it, the truth itself spoke through them. But you will say that here they erred and fell incautiously into a false opinion; we say that here they spoke the truth, and we prove this very easily through you yourself. For if your bishops, chosen by the whole party of Donatus to sustain the case of all, so that whatever they did the rest would hold as welcome and accepted, are nevertheless not to prejudice you, as you wish, in what you think they said rashly and wrongly, then they spoke the truth, because “neither does case prejudice case, nor person prejudice person.” And there you ought to recognize that, if you do not want the person of so many of your bishops, constituted in those seven, to prejudice the person of Donatus, presbyter of Mutugenna, how much less ought the person of Caecilian, even if some evil had been found in him, to prejudice the whole unity of Christ, which is not shut up in one village, Mutugenna, but spread throughout the whole world!

### Translation notes

- The Conference of Carthage of 411 between Catholic and Donatist bishops; each side was represented by seven spokesmen. Caecilian was the bishop of Carthage whose ordination began the schism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.7 (CSEL 44:645–646; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-7).

## Letter 173.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-8
- Source: CSEL 44:646
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' own treatment of the Maximianists under Primian shows that the case of Caecilian cannot condemn the Catholic Church.

### Latin text

Sed ecce facimus, quod uoluisti; sic tecum agimus, ac si non dixerint uestri: Nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat tu inueni, quid illic dicere debuerint, cum eis obiecta esset causa et persona Primiani, qui damnatores suos et damnauit cum ceteris et damnatos ac detestatos in suo rursus honore suscepit et baptismum, quem mortui dederant. quia de ipsis in illa praeclara sententia dictum erat. quod mortuorum funeribus plena sint litora, agnoscere potius et acceptare quam exsufflare et rescindere maluit totumque dissoluit, quod male intellegentes dicere soletis, quia qui baptizatur a mortuo, quid ei prodest lauacrum eius? si ergo non dicerent: Nec causa causae nec persona personae praeiudicat. rei tenerentur in causa Primiani; cum autem hoc dixerunt. immunem fecerunt ecclesiam catholicam, sicut nos adserebamus, a causa Caeciliani.

### English translation (Claude)

But see, we do what you wanted; we deal with you as if your people had not said, “Neither does case prejudice case, nor person prejudice person.” You find what they ought to have said there, when the case and person of Primian were raised against them: Primian, who condemned his own condemners along with the rest, and then received the condemned and abhorred back into their honor, and chose to recognize and accept the baptism that these “dead” men had given (since in that famous sentence it had been said of them that the shores were full of the funerals of the dead), rather than to exorcise and annul it; and thereby he dissolved entirely what you are accustomed to say, misunderstanding it: “If one is baptized by a dead man, what does his washing profit him?” So if they had not said, “Neither does case prejudice case, nor person prejudice person,” they would have been held guilty in the case of Primian; but when they said it, they freed the Catholic Church, as we maintained, from the case of Caecilian.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 34:25 (Sirach): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Primian, Donatist bishop of Carthage, was condemned by the Maximianist schismatics; he and the council of Bagai (394) condemned them, yet later received some of them back with the baptism they had given. “The shores full of the funerals of the dead” is a phrase from the Bagai sentence. Quotation: Sir 34:25 (34:30 in some editions; outside the 66 books), as used by the Donatists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.8 (CSEL 44:646; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-8).

## Letter 173.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-9
- Source: CSEL 44:646–647
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Donatus to read the record of the conference and choose unity.

### Latin text

Sed cetera lege, cetera discute. uide, utrum in ipsum Caecilianum, de cuius persona praeiudicare conabantur ecclesiae. aliquid mali probare potuerint. uide, utrum non potius etiam pro illo multa egerint et pluribus lectionibus, quas contra se protulerunt et recitauerunt, causam eius bonam omnino firmauerint. lege ista uel legantur tibi. considera omnia, retracta diligenter et elige, quid sequaris, utrum nobiscum in Christi pace, in ecclesiae catholicae unitate, in fraterna caritate gaudere an pro nefaria dissensione, pro Donati parte, pro sacrilega diuisione importunitatem nostrae circa te dilectionis diutius sustinere.

### English translation (Claude)

But read the rest; examine the rest. See whether they could prove any evil against Caecilian himself, by whose person they were trying to prejudice the church. See whether they did not rather do much in his favor, and by the many documents they produced and read out against themselves did not wholly confirm that his case was good. Read these things, or have them read to you. Consider everything, go over it carefully, and choose what you will follow: whether to rejoice with us in the peace of Christ, in the unity of the Catholic Church, in brotherly love; or, for an unholy dissension, for the party of Donatus, for a sacrilegious division, to endure any longer the importunity of our love toward you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.9 (CSEL 44:646–647; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-9).

## Letter 173.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-10
- Source: CSEL 44:647–648
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reads “compel them to come in” (Luke 14:23) as warrant for the church, now strong, to compel the Donatists to unity.

### Latin text

Adtendis enim et saepe repetis, sicut audio, quod in euangelio scriptum est recessisse a domino septuaginta discipulos et arbitrio suae malae atque impiae discessionis fuisse permissos ceterisque duodecim, qui remanserant, fuisse responsum: Numquid et uos uultis ire? et non adtendis, quia tunc primum ecclesia nouello germine pullulabat nondumque in ea fuerat completa illa prophetia: Et adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae, omnes gentes seruient illi, quod utique quanto magis impletur, tanto maiore utitur ecclesia potestate, ut non solum inuitet, sed etiam cogat ad bonum. hoc tunc dominus significare uolebat, qui quamuis haberet magnam potestatem, prius tamen elegit commendare humilitatem. hoc et in illa conuiuii similitudine satis euidenter ostendit, ubi misit ad inuitatos et uenire noluerunt; et ait seruo: Exi in plateas et uicos ciuitatis et pauperes et debiles et caecos et claudos introduc huc. et ait seruus domino: Factum est, ut imperasti, et adhuc locus est. et ait dominus seruo: Exi in uias et saepes et compelle intrare, ut impleatur domus mea. uide nunc, quem ad modum de his, qui prius uenerunt, dictum est: Introduc eos, non dictum est compelle, ita significata sunt ecclesiae primordia adhuc crescentis, ut essent uires etiam compellendi. proinde, quia oportebat eius iam uiribus et magnitudine roborata etiam compelli homines ad conuiuium salutis aeternae, posteaquam dictum est: Factum est, quod iussisti, et adhuc est locus, exi, inquit, in uias et saepes et compelle intrare. quapropter, si ambularetis quieti extra hoc conuiuium sanctae unitatis ecclesiae, tamquam in uiis uos inueniremus; nunc uero, quia per multa mala et saeua, quae in nostros committitis, tamquam spinis et asperitate pleni estis, uos tamquam in saepibus inuenimus et intrare compellimus. qui compellitur. quo non uult, cogitur, sed, cum intrauerit, iam uolens pascitur. cohibe itaque iam iniquum et inpacatum animum, ut in uera ecclesia Christi inuenias salutare conuiuium.

### English translation (Claude)

For you point out and often repeat, as I hear, what is written in the Gospel: that seventy disciples withdrew from the Lord and were left to the choice of their evil and impious departure, and that to the other twelve who remained it was said, “Do you also want to go away?” And you do not notice that at that time the church was first sprouting from a new shoot, and that prophecy had not yet been fulfilled in it: “And all the kings of the earth shall worship him; all nations shall serve him.” The more fully this is fulfilled, the greater the power the church uses, not only to invite but also to compel to good. This is what the Lord wished to signify then: though he had great power, he chose first to commend humility. He showed this quite clearly in that parable of the banquet, where he sent to those invited and they would not come; and he said to the servant: “Go out into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in here the poor and the crippled and the blind and the lame.” And the servant said to the master: “It has been done as you commanded, and there is still room.” And the master said to the servant: “Go out into the roads and hedges and compel them to come in, so that my house may be filled.” See now how of those who came first it was said, “Bring them in,” not “compel”: so the beginnings of the church were signified, still growing, so that it would later have strength even to compel. Accordingly, because, once the church was strengthened by power and greatness, people had to be compelled even to the banquet of eternal salvation, after it was said, “What you ordered has been done, and there is still room,” he said, “Go out into the roads and hedges and compel them to come in.” Therefore, if you were walking peacefully outside this banquet of the holy unity of the church, we would find you as if in the roads; but now, because through the many cruel evils you commit against our people you are full of thorns and harshness, as it were, we find you as if in the hedges and we compel you to come in. Whoever is compelled is forced where he does not wish to go; but when he has come in, he now feeds willingly. So restrain now your unjust and unpeaceful mind, so that in the true church of Christ you may find the banquet of salvation.

### Scripture references

- John 6:66–67: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:16–23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine says “seventy disciples”; John 6:66 gives no number. Quotations: John 6:67; Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX/Vulgate); Luke 14:21–23. This is a key passage in Augustine's defense of coercion; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 173.10 (CSEL 44:647–648; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-173-10).

## Letter 174.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-174-1
- Source: CSEL 44:650–652
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Aurelius of Carthage the finished books On the Trinity, explaining that part of the work had been taken and circulated before completion.

### Latin text

De trinitate, quae deus summus et uerus est, libros iuuenis inchoaui, senex edidi. omiseram quippe hoc opus, posteaquam comperi praereptos mihi esse siue subreptos, antequam eos absoluerem et retractatos, ut mea dispositio fuerat, expolirem. non enim singillatim sed omnes simul edere ea ratione decreueram, quoniam praecedentibus consequentes inquisitione proficiente nectuntur. cum ergo per eos homines, qui, priusquam uellem, ad quosdam illorum peruenire potuerunt, dispositio mea nequiuisset impleri, interruptam dictationem reliqueram cogitans hoc ipsum in aliquibus scriptis meis conqueri, ut scirent, qui possent, non a me fuisse eosdem libros editos sed ablatos, priusquam mihi editione mea digni uiderentur. uerum multorum fratrum uehementissima postulatione et maxime tua iussione compulsus opus tam laboriosum adiuuante domino terminare curaui eosque emendatos, non ut uolui, sed ut potui, ne ab illis, qui subrepti iam in manus hominum exierant, plurimum discreparent, uenerationi tuae per filium nostrum condiaconum carissimum misi et cuicumque audiendos, legendos describendosque permisi. in quibus si seruari mea dispositio potuisset, essent profecto etsi easdem sententias habentes multo tamen enodatiores atque planiores, quantum rerum tantarum explicandarum difficultas et facultas nostra pateretur. sunt autem, qui primos quattuor uel potius quinque etiam sine prooemiis habent et duodecimum sine extrema parte non parua. sed si eis haec editio potuerit innotescere, omnia, si uoluerint et ualuerint, emendabunt. peto sane, ut hanc epistulam seorsum quidem sed tamen ad caput eorundem librorum iubeas anteponi. ora pro me.

### English translation (Claude)

The books on the Trinity, which is the supreme and true God, I began as a young man and publish as an old one. I had in fact laid this work aside after I discovered that they had been taken from me, or stolen, before I had completed them and polished them by revision, as I had planned. For I had decided to publish them not one by one but all together, because the later ones are linked to the earlier as the inquiry advances. So, since my plan could not be carried out because of those people who were able to get at some of them before I wished, I had left off my dictation, intending to complain of this very thing in some of my writings, so that those who could might know that those books were not published by me but taken away before they seemed to me worthy of publication. But, compelled by the most insistent request of many brothers and above all by your command, I have taken care, with the Lord's help, to finish so laborious a work; and having corrected them, not as I wished but as I could, so that they would not differ very much from those that had already been stolen and gone out into people's hands, I have sent them to Your Reverence by our son, our dearest fellow deacon, and I have permitted anyone to hear, read, and copy them. If my plan could have been kept in them, they would certainly, while containing the same ideas, have been much clearer and plainer, as far as the difficulty of explaining such great matters and my own ability allowed. There are some who have the first four, or rather five, books even without their prefaces, and the twelfth without a not inconsiderable final part. But if this edition can become known to them, they will correct everything, if they wish and are able. I ask that you have this letter placed separately, but at the head of these same books. Pray for me.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Aurelius, bishop of Carthage; the letter served as the preface to On the Trinity. “Our son, our dearest fellow deacon” is Augustine's wording (“condiaconum”), translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 174.1 (CSEL 44:650–652; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-174-1).

## Letter 175.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-1
- Source: CSEL 44:653–655
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Council of Carthage (416) reports to Pope Innocent that it has renewed the condemnation of Pelagius and Caelestius.

### Latin text

Cum ex more ad Carthaginensem ecclesiam sollemniter ueniremus atque ex diuersis causis congregata ex nobis synodus haberetur, conpresbyter noster Orosius nobis litteras sanctorum fratrum et consacerdotum nostrorum dedit, Herotis et Lazari, quorum formam his constituimus esse subdendam. his ergo lectis Pelagium et Caelestium auctores nefarii prorsus et ab omnibus nobis anathemandi erroris aduertimus. unde factum est, ut recensendum peteremus, quid ante ferme quinquennium super Caelestii nomine hic apud ecclesiam Carthaginensem fuerit agitatum. quo recitato, sicut ex subditis aduertere poterit sanctitas tua, quamuis iudicatio manifesta constaret. quia illo tempore episcopali iudicio excisum hoc tantum uulnus ab ecclesia uideretur, nihilo minus tamen id communi deliberatione censuimus, ut huius modi persuasionis auctores, quamuis et ad presbyterium idem Caelestius postea peruenisse dicatur. nisi haec apertissime anathemauerint, ipsos anathemari oporteat, ut. si ipsorum non potuerit, saltem eorum, qui ab eis decepti sunt uel decipi possunt, cognita sententia, quae in eos lata est, sanitas procuretur.

### English translation (Claude)

When we came, according to custom, to the church of Carthage for the solemn assembly, and a synod of us was held, gathered for various matters, our fellow presbyter Orosius gave us a letter from our holy brothers and fellow priests Heros and Lazarus, a copy of which we have decided to attach to this. When it had been read, we observed that Pelagius and Caelestius were charged as authors of an error that is altogether wicked and must be anathematized by all of us. Hence it came about that we asked that what had been done in this church of Carthage about Caelestius almost five years ago be reviewed. When this had been read, as Your Holiness will be able to see from the attached documents, although the judgment was clearly established, since at that time this great wound seemed to have been cut out of the church by episcopal judgment, we nevertheless decided by common deliberation that the authors of such a persuasion, though the same Caelestius is said to have afterwards reached the presbyterate, must be anathematized unless they most openly anathematize these things; so that, if their own healing cannot be achieved, at least the healing of those who have been deceived by them, or can be deceived, may be brought about once the sentence passed against them is known.

### Translation notes

- Synodal letter of the Council of Carthage (416) to Pope Innocent I, preserved among Augustine's letters. Heros and Lazarus were Gallic bishops who had accused Pelagius in Palestine. The earlier proceedings are the condemnation of Caelestius at Carthage in 411.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.1 (CSEL 44:653–655; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-1).

## Letter 175.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-2
- Source: CSEL 44:655–656
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The council asks for the apostolic see's authority against those who reduce grace to created nature and the law.

### Latin text

Hoc itaque gestum, domine frater, sanctae caritati tuae intimandum duximus, ut statutis nostrae mediocritatis etiam apostolicae sedis adhibeatur auctoritas pro tuenda salute multorum et quorundam peruersitate etiam corrigenda. id enim agunt isti damnabilibus disputationibus suis, ut non defendendo sed potius in superbiam sacrilegam extollendo liberum arbitrium nullum relinquant locum gratiae dei, qua Christiani sumus, qua et ipsum nostrae uoluntatis arbitrium uere fit liberum, dum a carnalium concupiscentiarum dominatione liberatur dicente domino: Si uos filius liberauerit, tunc uere liberi eritis, quod auxilium fides impetrat, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. isti autem adserunt, sicut a fratribus, qui etiam eorum libros legerunt. cognouimus, in eo dei gratiam deputandam, quod talem hominis instituit creauitque naturam, quae per propriam uoluntatem legem dei possit implere siue naturaliter in corde conscriptam siue in litteris datam; eandem quoque legem ad gratiam pertinere, quod illam deus in adiutorium hominibus dedit.

### English translation (Claude)

We have thought it right, lord brother, to make this proceeding known to your holy love, so that the authority of the apostolic see may also be added to the decrees of our lowliness, for protecting the salvation of many and for correcting the perversity of some. For these men, by their damnable arguments, do this: not by defending free choice but rather by exalting it to sacrilegious pride, they leave no place for the grace of God by which we are Christians, by which even the choice of our will is made truly free, when it is set free from the domination of fleshly desires, as the Lord says: “If the Son sets you free, then you will be truly free”; and this help is obtained by faith, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. But they assert, as we have learned from brothers who have also read their books, that the grace of God is to be reckoned to consist in this: that he established and created human nature such that it could fulfill God's law by its own will, whether the law written naturally in the heart or given in writing; and that this same law belongs to grace, in that God gave it to men as a help.

### Scripture references

- John 8:36: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 8:36. Allusion: Rom 2:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.2 (CSEL 44:655–656; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-2).

## Letter 175.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-3
- Source: CSEL 44:656–658
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture testifies to grace that frees the will, which the Pelagians in effect deny by making nature sufficient.

### Latin text

Illam uero gratiam, qua, ut dictum est, Christiani sumus, cuius apostolus praedicator est dicens: Condelector enim legi dei secundum interiorem hominem; uideo autem aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. miser ego homo! quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, nolunt omnino cognoscere nec aperte quidem oppugnare audent. sed quid aliud agunt, cum hominibus animalibus non percipientibus, quae sunt spiritus dei, persuadere non cessant ad operandam perficiendamque iustitiam et dei mandata complenda solam sibi humanam sufficere posse naturam non adtendentes, quod scriptum est: Spiritus adiuuat infirmitatem nostram et: Non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei et quod unum corpus sumus in Christo Iesu. singuli autem alter alterius. membra habentes dona diuersa secundum gratiam, quae data est nobis, et: Gratia dei sum id, quod sum, et gratia eius in me uacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboraui non ego autem sed gratia dei mecum, et: Gratias deo, qui dedit nobis uictoriam per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, et: Non quia idonei sumus cogitare aliquid quasi ex nobismet ipsis, sed sufficientia nostra ex deo est, et: Habemus thesaurum istum in uasis fictilibus, ut eminentia uirtutis sit dei et non ex nobis, et innumerabilia, quae de scripturis omnibus si colligere uelimus, tomus non sufficit? et ueremur, ne apud te ista ipsa commemorando, quae maiore gratia de sede apostolica praedicas, inconuenienter facere uideamur; sed ideo facimus, quia eo, quod infirmiores sumus, quaqua uersum quisque nostrum uerbo dei praedicando putatur attentior. crebrius eos patimur et audacius insurgentes.

### English translation (Claude)

But that grace by which, as was said, we are Christians, of which the apostle is the preacher when he says, “For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man; but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind and taking me captive in the law of sin that is in my members. Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord”: this they refuse altogether to acknowledge, nor do they dare to attack it openly. But what else are they doing, when they never stop persuading people who are natural and do not perceive the things of the Spirit of God that, for working and perfecting righteousness and fulfilling God's commandments, human nature alone can suffice for them? They do not heed what is written: “The Spirit helps our weakness,” and, “It is not of him who wills or of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy,” and that we are one body in Christ Jesus, and individually members one of another, having different gifts according to the grace given to us; and, “By the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace in me was not in vain, but I labored more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me”; and, “Thanks be to God, who has given us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ”; and, “Not that we are sufficient to think anything as from ourselves, but our sufficiency is from God”; and, “We have this treasure in earthen vessels, so that the surpassing power may be God's and not from us”; and countless others, for which a volume would not suffice if we wished to collect them from all the Scriptures. And we fear that in mentioning these very things to you, who preach them with greater grace from the apostolic see, we may seem to act unfittingly; but we do so because, being weaker, the more attentive any one of us is thought to be in preaching the word of God anywhere, the more often and the more boldly we suffer them rising up against us.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:22–25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:5–6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:57: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 7:22–25; Rom 8:26; Rom 9:16; 1 Cor 15:10; 1 Cor 15:57; 2 Cor 3:5; 2 Cor 4:7. Allusions: 1 Cor 2:14; Rom 12:5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.3 (CSEL 44:656–658; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-3).

## Letter 175.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-4
- Source: CSEL 44:658–659
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagianism makes prayer for help against temptation and for perseverance in faith meaningless.

### Latin text

Si ergo Pelagius episcopalibus gestis, quae in oriente confecta dicuntur, etiam tuae uenerationi iuste nisus fuerit absolutus, error tamen ipse et impietas, quae iam multos assertores habet per diuersa dispersos, etiam auctoritate apostolicae sedis anathemanda est. consideret enim sanctitas tua et pastoralibus nobis compatiatur uisceribus. quam sit pestiferum et exitiabile ouibus Christi, quod istorum sacrilegas disputationes necessario sequitur, ut nec orare debeamus. ne intremus in temptationem, quod dominus discipulos monuit et posuit in oratione, quam docuit, aut ne deficiat fides nostra, quod pro apostolo Petro se rogasse ipse testatus est. si enim possibilitate naturae et arbitrio uoluntatis in potestate sunt constituta, quis non ea uideat a domino inaniter peti et fallaciter orari, cum orando poscuntur, quae naturae iam ita conditae sufficientibus uiribus obtinentur, nec debuisse dicere dominum Iesum: Vigilate et orate, sed tantum modo: Vigilate, ne intretis in temptationem, nec beatissimo primo apostolorum: Rogaui pro te, sed moneo te uel impero ac praecipio, ne deficiat fides tua?

### English translation (Claude)

So even if Pelagius seemed to Your Reverence to have been justly acquitted by the episcopal proceedings said to have been held in the East, the error itself and the impiety, which now has many defenders scattered in various places, must still be anathematized by the authority of the apostolic see as well. For let Your Holiness consider, and have compassion with us with a shepherd's heart, how pestilent and deadly it is for Christ's sheep that the necessary consequence of these men's sacrilegious arguments is that we should not pray that we may not enter into temptation, which the Lord warned his disciples to do and placed in the prayer he taught, nor that our faith may not fail, which he himself testified that he asked for the apostle Peter. For if these things are placed in our power by the capacity of nature and the choice of the will, who would not see that they are asked of the Lord in vain and prayed for deceitfully, when by praying we ask for what is obtained by the sufficient powers of nature as already created? And the Lord Jesus ought not to have said, “Watch and pray,” but only, “Watch, so that you may not enter into temptation”; nor to the most blessed first of the apostles, “I have prayed for you,” but, “I warn you,” or, “I command and charge you, that your faith may not fail.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:13: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:41: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 22:32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The proceedings in the East are the Synod of Diospolis (415), which acquitted Pelagius. Quotations and allusions: Matt 6:13; Matt 26:41; Luke 22:32. “Even if … seemed … justly acquitted”: the Latin is awkward (“etiam tuae uenerationi iuste nisus fuerit absolutus”); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.4 (CSEL 44:658–659; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-4).

## Letter 175.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-5
- Source: CSEL 44:659–660
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagianism also empties the bishops' blessings and Paul's prayers for strength of meaning.

### Latin text

Contradicitur etiam istorum contentione benedictionibus nostris, ut incassum super populum dicere uideamur, quicquid eis a domino precamur, ut recte ac pie uiuendo illi placeant, uel illa, quae pro fidelibus precatur apostolus dicens: Flecto genua mea ad patrem domini nostri Iesu Christi ex quo omnis paternitas in caelo et in terra nominatur. ut det uobis secundum diuitias gloriae suae uirtute corroborari per spiritum eius. si ergo uoluerimus benedicendo super populum dicere: Da illi, domine, uirtute corroborari per spiritum tuum, istorum nobis disputatio contradicit adfirmans negari liberum arbitrium, si hoc a deo poscitur. quod in nostra est potestate: uirtute enim corroborari si uolumus, inquiunt, possumus ea possibilitate naturae, quam non nunc accipimus, sed, cum crearemur, accepimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Their contentiousness also contradicts our blessings, so that we seem to say in vain over the people whatever we ask for them from the Lord, that by living rightly and devoutly they may please him; or what the apostle prays for the faithful when he says: “I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom every fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named, that he may grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with power through his Spirit.” So if, in blessing the people, we wish to say, “Grant them, O Lord, to be strengthened with power through your Spirit,” their argument contradicts us, asserting that free choice is denied if what is in our power is asked of God. “For if we wish,” they say, “we can be strengthened with power by that capacity of nature which we do not receive now, but received when we were created.”

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:14–16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Eph 3:14–16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.5 (CSEL 44:659–660; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-5).

## Letter 175.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-6
- Source: CSEL 44:660–663
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The council anathematizes those who deny the necessity of grace and of infant baptism for salvation.

### Latin text

Paruulos etiam propter salutem, quae per saluatorem Christum datur, baptizandos negant ac sic eos mortifera ista doctrina in aeternum necant promittentes, etiamsi non baptizentur, habituros uitam aeternam nec pertinere, de quibus dominus ait: Venit enim filius hominis quaerere et saluare, quod perierat, quia isti, inquiunt, non perierant nec est, quod in eis saluetur uel tanto pretio redimatur, quia nihil est in eis uitiatum, nihil tenetur sub diaboli potestate captiuum nec pro eis fusus esse sanguis in remissionem legitur peccatorum. quamquam per baptismum Christi etiam paruulorum fieri redemptionem libello suo Caelestius in Carthaginensi ecclesia iam confessus est; sed multi, qui eorum perhibentur esse uel fuisse discipuli, haec mala, quibus fundamenta Christianae fidei conantur euertere. quacumque possunt, adfirmare non cessant. unde etiamsi Pelagius Caelestiusque correcti sunt uel se ista numquam sensisse dicunt et, quaecumque scripta contra eos prolata fuerint, sua esse negabunt nec est. quem ad modum de mendacio conuincantur, generaliter tamen. quicumque dogmatizat et adfirmat humanam sibi ad uincenda peccata et dei mandata facienda sufficere posse naturam et eo modo gratiae dei, quae sanctorum euidentius orationibus declaratur, aduersarius inuenitur et quicumque negat paruulos per baptismum Christi a perditione liberari et salutem percipere sempiternam, anathema sit. quaecumque autem alia eis obiciuntur, non dubium uenerationem tuam, cum gesta episcopalia perspexerit, quae in oriente in eadem causa confecta dicuntur, id iudicaturum, unde omnes in dei misericordia gaudeamus. ora pro nobis, domine beatissime papa.

### English translation (Claude)

They also deny that little children are to be baptized for the sake of the salvation given through Christ the Savior, and so by this deadly teaching they kill them forever, promising that even if they are not baptized they will have eternal life, and that they do not belong to those of whom the Lord says, “For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost”; because, they say, these were not lost, and there is nothing in them to be saved or redeemed at so great a price, since nothing in them is corrupted, nothing is held captive under the devil's power, nor do we read that blood was shed for them for the forgiveness of sins. And yet Caelestius has already confessed in his booklet in the church of Carthage that the redemption of little children too takes place through the baptism of Christ; but many who are said to be or to have been their disciples do not stop asserting, wherever they can, these evils by which they try to overthrow the foundations of the Christian faith. Hence, even if Pelagius and Caelestius have been corrected, or say they never held these views, and deny that whatever writings are brought against them are their own, and there is no way to convict them of lying, still, in general: whoever teaches and asserts that human nature can suffice of itself for overcoming sins and keeping God's commandments, and is thereby found an enemy of the grace of God, which is declared more evidently in the prayers of the saints; and whoever denies that little children are freed from perdition and receive eternal salvation through the baptism of Christ, let him be anathema. As for whatever else is charged against them, we do not doubt that Your Reverence, when you have examined the episcopal proceedings said to have been held in the East on the same case, will judge in a way in which we may all rejoice in the mercy of God. Pray for us, most blessed lord pope.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Luke 19:10; Matt 26:28. The council's description of the Pelagian view of infant baptism is its own; Pelagius and Caelestius in fact accepted infant baptism, though not for the forgiveness of inherited sin.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 175.6 (CSEL 44:660–663; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-175-6).

## Letter 176.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-1
- Source: CSEL 44:664
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Council of Milevis (416) appeals to Pope Innocent to act for the endangered members of Christ.

### Latin text

Quia te dominus gratiae suae praecipuo munere in sede apostolica conlocauit talemque nostris temporibus praestitit, ut nobis potius ad culpam neglegentiae ualeat, si apud tuam uenerationem, quae pro ecclesia suggerenda sunt, tacuerimus, quam ea tu possis uel fastidiose uel neglegenter accipere. magnis periculis infirmorum membrorum Christi pastoralem diligentiam, quaesumus, adhibere digneris.

### English translation (Claude)

Since the Lord, by a special gift of his grace, has placed you in the apostolic see, and has given you to our times as such a man that it would rather count against us as negligence if we kept silent before Your Reverence about what should be brought to your notice for the church's sake, than that you could receive it with disdain or negligence, we ask you to be so good as to apply your pastoral care to the great dangers of the weak members of Christ.

### Translation notes

- Synodal letter of the Numidian Council of Milevis (416) to Pope Innocent I.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 176.1 (CSEL 44:664; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-1).

## Letter 176.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-2
- Source: CSEL 44:664–666
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The council describes the Pelagian denial that prayer and grace are needed against sin and that unbaptized infants are lost.

### Latin text

Noua quippe haeresis et nimium perniciosa temptat adsurgere inimicorum gratiae Christi, qui nobis dominicam etiam orationem impiis disputationibus conantur auferre. cum enim dominus docuerit, ut dicamus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris, isti dicunt posse hominem in hac uita praeceptis dei cognitis ad tantam perfectionem iustitiae sine adiutorio gratiae saluatoris per solum liberae uoluntatis arbitrium peruenire, ut etiam non sit necessarium dicere: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. illud uero, quod sequitur: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, non ita intellegendum, tamquam diuinum adiutorium poscere debeamus, ne in peccatum temptati decidamus, sed hoc in nostra esse positum potestate et ad hoc implendum solam sufficere hominis uoluntatem, tamquam frustra apostolus dixerit: Non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei et: Fidelis deus, qui non uos permittat temptari super id, quod potestis, sed faciet cum temptatione etiam exitum, ut possitis sustinere, frustra etiam dominus dixerit apostolo Petro: Rogaui pro te, ne deficiat fides tua, et omnibus suis: Vigilate et orate, ne intretis in temptationem, si hoc totum est potestatis humanae. pueros quoque paruulos, si nullis inbuantur Christianae gratiae sacramentis, habituros uitam aeternam nequaquam Christiana praesumptione contendunt euacuantes, quod dicit apostolus: Per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, et alio loco: Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

For a new and very pernicious heresy is attempting to rise up, of enemies of the grace of Christ, who by impious arguments try to take from us even the Lord's Prayer. For when the Lord taught us to say, “Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors,” these men say that a person in this life, once he knows God's commandments, can reach such perfection of righteousness by the choice of free will alone, without the help of the Savior's grace, that it is not even necessary to say, “Forgive us our debts.” And what follows, “Lead us not into temptation,” is not, they say, to be understood as though we ought to ask for divine help so as not to fall into sin when tempted; rather, this is placed in our power, and the human will alone suffices to accomplish it; as though the apostle said in vain, “It is not of him who wills or of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy,” and, “God is faithful, who will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear, but with the temptation will also make a way out, so that you can endure it”; and as though the Lord also said in vain to the apostle Peter, “I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail,” and to all his own, “Watch and pray, that you may not enter into temptation,” if all this is in human power. They also maintain, with a presumption not at all Christian, that little children, even if they are not initiated with any sacraments of Christian grace, will have eternal life, emptying what the apostle says: “Through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so it passed to all men, in whom all sinned,” and in another place: “As in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:12–13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 22:32: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:41: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 6:12–13; Rom 9:16; 1 Cor 10:13; Luke 22:32; Matt 26:41; Rom 5:12 (Latin “in quo,” “in whom”); 1 Cor 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 176.2 (CSEL 44:664–666; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-2).

## Letter 176.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-3
- Source: CSEL 44:666–667
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The two chief errors are that God's help need not be asked and that the sacrament does not benefit infants.

### Latin text

Ut ergo alia omittamus, quae contra sanctas scripturas plurima disserunt, haec interim duo, quibus omnino totum, quod Christiani sumus. conantur euertere, quae fidelia corda sustineant, non esse rogandum deum, ut contra peccati malum atque ad operandam iustitiam sit noster adiutor, et non opitulari paruulis ad consequendam uitam aeternam Christianae gratiae sacramentum, haec insinuantes apostolico pectori tuo non opus habemus multa dicere et tantam impietatem uerbis exaggerare, cum procul dubio te ista permoueant, ut ab eis corrigendis, ne latius serpant multosque contaminent uel potius interimant, dum sub nomine Christi a Christi gratia penitus alienant, omnino dissimulare non possis.

### English translation (Claude)

To pass over the many other things they argue against the Holy Scriptures, as we point out to your apostolic heart these two for now, by which they try to overthrow altogether all that makes us Christians (and what faithful hearts could bear them?): that God is not to be asked to be our helper against the evil of sin and for working righteousness, and that the sacrament of Christian grace does not help little children to attain eternal life; we have no need to say much or to magnify so great an impiety with words, since without doubt these things move you so that you cannot possibly overlook correcting them, lest they creep further and contaminate, or rather kill, many, while under the name of Christ they estrange them wholly from the grace of Christ.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 176.3 (CSEL 44:666–667; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-3).

## Letter 176.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-4
- Source: CSEL 44:667
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius and Caelestius are named; Pelagius is said to be deceiving people in Jerusalem, opposed by Jerome.

### Latin text

Huius autem perniciosissimi erroris auctores esse perhibentur Pelagius et Caelestius, quos quidem in ecclesia sanari malumus quam desperata salute ab ecclesia resecari, si necessitas nulla compellat. quorum unus, id est Caelestius etiam ad presbyterium in Asia dicitur peruenisse, de quo ante paucos annos quid gestum fuerit, sanctitas tua de Carthaginensi ecclesia. melius instruitur. Pelagius uero, sicut a quibusdam fratribus nostris missae loquuntur epistulae, Hierosolymis constitutus nonnullos fallere adseritur. uerum tamen multo plures, qui eius sensus diligentius indagare potuerunt, aduersus eum pro gratia Christi et catholicae fidei ueritate confligunt sed praecipue sanctus filius tuus, frater et conpresbyter noster Hieronymus.

### English translation (Claude)

The authors of this most pernicious error are said to be Pelagius and Caelestius, whom we would rather see healed within the church than cut off from the church with their salvation despaired of, unless some necessity compels it. One of them, Caelestius, is said to have reached even the presbyterate in Asia; what was done about him a few years ago Your Holiness is better informed by the church of Carthage. Pelagius, as letters sent by some of our brothers relate, is said to be living in Jerusalem and deceiving a number of people. Yet far more, who have been able to investigate his views more carefully, are contending against him for the grace of Christ and the truth of the Catholic faith, and above all your holy son, our brother and fellow presbyter Jerome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 176.4 (CSEL 44:667; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-4).

## Letter 176.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-5
- Source: CSEL 44:667–669
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Numidian council hopes the pope's authority will correct the Pelagians, following Carthage's letter.

### Latin text

Sed arbitramur adiuuante misericordia domini dei nostri, quae te et regere consulentem et orantem exaudire dignatur, auctoritati sanctitatis tuae de sanctarum scripturarum auctoritate depromptae facilius eos, qui tam peruersa et perniciosa sentiunt, esse cessuros, ut de correctione potius eorum congratulemur, quam contristemur interitu, domine beatissime. quodlibet autem ipsi eligant, certe uel aliis, quos plurimos possunt, si ab eis dissimuletur. suis laqueis implicare, cernit uenerabilitas tua instanter et celeriter prouidendum. haec ad sanctitatem tuam de concilio Numidiae scripta direximus imitantes Carthaginensem ecclesiam et Carthaginensis prouinciae coepiscopos nostros, quos ad sedem apostolicam, quam beatus inlustras, de hac causa scripsisse comperimus. [Et alia manu:] Memor nostri in domini gratia augearis, domine beatissime meritoque uenerabilis et in Christo honorande sancte papa.

### English translation (Claude)

But we think that, with the help of the mercy of the Lord our God, who deigns both to guide you when you take counsel and to hear you when you pray, those who hold such perverse and pernicious views will more readily yield to the authority of Your Holiness drawn from the authority of the Holy Scriptures, so that we may rather rejoice together at their correction than grieve at their destruction, most blessed lord. But whichever they themselves choose, Your Reverence certainly sees that provision must be made urgently and quickly, at least for the others, very many of whom they can entangle in their snares if they are left alone. We have sent this to Your Holiness from the council of Numidia, following the example of the church of Carthage and our fellow bishops of the province of Carthage, who, we have learned, have written about this case to the apostolic see, which you adorn with blessing. [And in another hand:] May you grow in the grace of the Lord, mindful of us, most blessed lord, deservedly venerable and holy pope to be honored in Christ.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 176.5 (CSEL 44:667–669; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/171-1/#p-176-5).

## Letter 177.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-1
- Source: CSEL 44:669–670
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Five African bishops write to Pope Innocent, following the councils of Carthage and Milevis, against those who trust in their own strength rather than in grace.

### Latin text

De conciliis duobus prouinciae Carthaginensis atque Numidiae ad tuam sanctitatem a non paruo episcoporum numero subscriptas litteras misimus contra inimicos gratiae Christi, qui confidunt in uirtute sua et creatori nostro quodam modo dicunt: Tu nos fecisti homines, iustos autem ipsi nos fecimus, qui naturam humanam ideo dicunt liberam, ne quaerant liberatorem, ideo saluam, ut superfluum iudicent saluatorem: tantum enim dicunt ualentem, ut suis uiribus semel in origine suae creationis acceptis possit per liberum arbitrium nihil ulterius adiuuante illius gratia, qui creauit, domare et extinguere omnes cupiditates temptationesque superare. multi eorum insurgunt aduersum nos et dicunt animae nostrae: Non est salus illi in deo eius. familia Christi, quae dicit: Quando infirmor, tunc fortis sum et cui dicit dominus eius: Salus tua ego sum, suspenso corde cum timore et tremore adiutorium domini etiam per caritatem tuae uenerationis expectat.

### English translation (Claude)

From two councils, of the province of Carthage and of Numidia, we have sent Your Holiness letters signed by no small number of bishops, against the enemies of the grace of Christ, who trust in their own strength and in a way say to our Creator, “You made us men, but we have made ourselves righteous.” They call human nature free so that they may not seek a liberator, and sound so that they may judge the Savior superfluous; for they say it is so strong that, by the powers it received once for all at the origin of its creation, it can through free choice, with no further help from the grace of him who created it, tame and extinguish all desires and overcome temptations. Many of them rise up against us and say to our soul, “There is no salvation for him in his God.” The household of Christ, which says, “When I am weak, then I am strong,” and to which its Lord says, “I am your salvation,” waits with anxious heart, in fear and trembling, for the Lord's help, through the love also of Your Reverence.

### Scripture references

- Ps 49:6 (48:7 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ps 3:2 (3:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:10: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 35:3 (34:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter is from Aurelius, Alypius, Augustine, Evodius, and Possidius to Pope Innocent I (416). Quotations and allusions: Ps 49:6 (48:7 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 3:2 (3:3 LXX/Vulgate); 2 Cor 12:10; Ps 35:3 (34:3 LXX/Vulgate); Phil 2:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.1 (CSEL 44:669–670; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-1).

## Letter 177.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-2
- Source: CSEL 44:670–671
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops explain that the Eastern synod acquitted Pelagius because it understood “grace” in the Catholic sense, not as mere created nature.

### Latin text

Audiuimus enim esse in urbe Roma, ubi ille diu uixit. nonnullos, qui diuersis causis ei faueant, quidam scilicet, quia uos talia persuasisse perhibentur, plures uero, qui eum talia sentire non credunt, praesertim quia in oriente, ubi degit, gesta ecclesiastica facta esse iactantur, quibus putatur esse purgatus. ubi quidem si episcopi eum catholicum pronuntiarunt, non ob aliud factum esse credendum est, nisi quia se dixit dei gratiam confiteri et ait posse hominem suo labore ac uoluntate iuste uiuere, ut ad hoc adiuuari dei gratia non negaret. his enim auditis uerbis catholici antistites nullam aliam dei gratiam intellegere potuerunt, nisi quam in libris dei legere et populis dei praedicare consuerunt, eam utique, de qua dicit apostolus: Non inritam facio gratiam dei; nam si per legem iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est, sine dubio gratiam, qua iustificamur ab iniquitate et qua saluamur ab infirmitate, non qua creati sumus cum propria uoluntate. nam si intellexissent illi episcopi eam illum dicere gratiam, quam etiam cum impiis habemus, cum quibus homines sumus. negare uero eam, qua Christiani et filii dei sumus. quis eum patienter catholicorum sacerdotum non dicimus audiret, sed ante oculos suos ferret? quapropter non culpandi sunt iudices, quia ecclesiastica consuetudine gratiae nomen audierunt nescientes, quid huius modi homines uel in suae doctrinae libris uel in suorum solent auribus spargere.

### English translation (Claude)

For we have heard that in the city of Rome, where he lived for a long time, there are some who favor him for various reasons: some, it is said, because he persuaded them of such things; more, because they do not believe he holds such views, especially since it is boasted that church proceedings took place in the East, where he is living, by which he is thought to have been cleared. If the bishops there pronounced him Catholic, it must be believed that this happened for no other reason than that he said he confessed the grace of God, and said that a person can live righteously by his own effort and will, in such a way as not to deny that he is helped in this by the grace of God. For on hearing these words the Catholic bishops could understand no other grace of God than the one they were accustomed to read in God's books and preach to God's peoples: namely, that of which the apostle says, “I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died in vain”; without doubt the grace by which we are justified from iniquity and saved from weakness, not that by which we were created with our own will. For if those bishops had understood that he meant by grace that which we have even in common with the ungodly, with whom we are human beings, while denying the grace by which we are Christians and sons of God, who of the Catholic priests, we will not say, would have listened to him patiently, but would have tolerated him before their eyes? So the judges are not to be blamed, for they heard the word “grace” in the church's usual sense, not knowing what men of this kind are accustomed to spread, either in the books of their teaching or in the ears of their followers.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The proceedings are the Synod of Diospolis (415). Quotation: Gal 2:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.2 (CSEL 44:670–671; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-2).

## Letter 177.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-3
- Source: CSEL 44:671–672
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops ask the pope to summon or write to Pelagius to establish what he means by grace.

### Latin text

Non agitur de uno Pelagio, quia iam fortasse correctus est, quod utinam ita sit, sed tam multis, quibus loquaciter contendentibus et infirmas atque ineruditas animas uelut conuictas trahentibus, firmas autem et in fide stabiles ipsa contentione fatigantibus usque quaque iam plena sunt omnia. aut ergo a tua ueneratione accersendus est Romam et diligenter interrogandus, quam dicat gratiam, qua fateatur. si tamen iam fateatur, ad non peccandum iusteque uiuendum homines adiuuari, aut hoc ipsum cum eo per litteras agendum. et cum inuentus fuerit hanc dicere, quam docet ecclesiastica et apostolica ueritas, tunc sine ullo scrupulo ecclesiae, sine latibulo ambiguitatis ullius absoluendus est, tunc est re uera de eius purgatione gaudendum.

### English translation (Claude)

It is not a question of Pelagius alone, for he has perhaps been corrected already (would that it were so!), but of so many people with whom everything everywhere is now full: arguing talkatively, dragging weak and untaught souls along as if convinced, and wearying the strong and steadfast in faith by their very contentiousness. So either he should be summoned to Rome by Your Reverence and carefully questioned as to what grace he means when he confesses (if indeed he now confesses it) that people are helped not to sin and to live righteously; or this should be taken up with him by letter. And when he is found to mean the grace that the church's and apostles' truth teaches, then he should be acquitted without any scruple on the church's part, without any hiding place of ambiguity; then truly we should rejoice at his clearing.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.3 (CSEL 44:671–672; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-3).

## Letter 177.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-4
- Source: CSEL 44:672–673
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prayer not to be led into temptation shows that grace is more than nature, free choice, forgiveness, or law: it is help to do the commandment.

### Latin text

Siue enim dixerit gratiam esse liberum arbitrium siue gratiam esse remissionem peccatorum siue gratiam esse legis praeceptum, nihil eorum dicit, quod per subministrationem spiritus sancti pertinet ad concupiscentiam temptationesque uincendas, quem ditissime effudit super nos, qui ascendit in caelum et captiuauit captiuitatem, dedit dona hominibus. hinc enim oramus, ut peccatorum temptationem superare possimus, ut spiritus dei, unde pignus accepimus. adiuuet infirmitatem nostram. qui autem orat et dicit: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, non utique id orat. ut homo sit, quod est natura, neque id orat, ut habeat liberum arbitrium, quod iam accepit, cum crearetur ipsa natura, neque orat remissionem peccatorum, quia hoc superius dicitur: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, neque orat, ut accipiat mandatum, sed plane orat, ut faciat mandatum. si enim in temptationem inductus fuerit, hoc est in temptatione defecerit, facit utique peccatum, quod est contra mandatum. orat ergo, ut non peccet, hoc est ne quid faciat mali, quod pro Corinthiis orat apostolus dicens: Oramus autem ad dominum, ne quid faciatis mali. unde satis apparet, quod ad non peccandum, id est ad non male faciendum, quamuis esse non dubitetur arbitrium uoluntatis, tamen eius potestas non sufficiat, nisi adiuuetur infirmitas. ipsa igitur oratio clarissima est gratiae testificatio; hanc ille confiteatur et eum gaudebimus siue rectum siue correctum.

### English translation (Claude)

For whether he says that grace is free choice, or that grace is the forgiveness of sins, or that grace is the commandment of the law, he says nothing of what belongs, through the supply of the Holy Spirit, to overcoming desire and temptations: the Spirit whom he poured out most richly upon us who ascended into heaven, led captivity captive, and gave gifts to men. For this is why we pray that we may overcome the temptation to sin, that the Spirit of God, whose pledge we have received, may help our weakness. And whoever prays, saying, “Lead us not into temptation,” certainly does not pray to be a human being, which he is by nature; nor does he pray to have free choice, which he already received when that very nature was created; nor does he pray for the forgiveness of sins, because that is said earlier, “Forgive us our debts”; nor does he pray to receive the commandment; but plainly he prays to do the commandment. For if he is led into temptation, that is, if he gives way in temptation, he certainly commits sin, which is against the commandment. So he prays not to sin, that is, not to do anything evil, as the apostle prays for the Corinthians, saying, “But we pray to the Lord that you do nothing evil.” Hence it is clear enough that for not sinning, that is, for not doing evil, although there is no doubt that the choice of the will exists, yet its power does not suffice unless its weakness is helped. Prayer itself, then, is the clearest testimony to grace; let him confess this, and we shall rejoice in him, whether he has been right or has been set right.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:22: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 8:26: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:12–13: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 13:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Eph 4:8 (Ps 68:18); 2 Cor 1:22; Rom 8:26; Matt 6:12–13; 2 Cor 13:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.4 (CSEL 44:672–673; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-4).

## Letter 177.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-5
- Source: CSEL 44:673–675
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Every command (understanding, wisdom, self-control, avoiding evil, doing good) is matched by a prayer for the same thing, showing that law commands and grace helps.

### Latin text

Distinguenda est lex et gratia. lex iubere nouit, gratia iuuare. nec lex iuberet, nisi esset uoluntas, nec gratia iuuaret, si sat esset uoluntas. iubetur, ut habeamus intellectum, ubi dicitur: Nolite esse sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus, et tamen oramus, ut habeamus intellectum, ubi dicitur: Da mihi intellectum, ut discam mandata tua. iubetur, ut habeamus sapientiam, ubi dicitur: Stulti aliquando sapite, et tamen oratur, ut habeamus sapientiam, ubi dicitur: Si quis autem uestrum indiget sapientiam, postulet a deo, qui dat omnibus affluenter et non inproperat, et dabitur ei. iubetur, ut habeamus continentiam, ubi dicitur:........................... et tamen oratur, ut habeamus continentiam, ubi dicitur: Cum scirem, quia nemo potest esse continens, nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae scire, cuius esset hoc donum, adii dominum et deprecatus sum illum. postremo, ne nimium longum sit cuncta percurrere, iubetur, ut non faciamus malum. ubi dicitur: Declina a malo, et tamen oratur, ut non faciamus malum, ubi dicitur: Oramus autem ad dominum, ne quid faciatis mali. iubetur, ut faciamus bonum, ubi dicitur: Declina a malo et fac bonum, et tamen oratur, ut faciamus bonum, ubi dicitur: Non cessamus pro uobis orantes et postulantes; atque inter cetera, quae illis orat, dicit: Ut ambuletis digne deo in omne placitum, in omni opere et sermone bono. sicut ergo agnoscimus uoluntatem. cum haec praecipiuntur, sic et ipse agnoscat gratiam, cum petuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Law and grace must be distinguished. Law knows how to command, grace how to help. Law would not command unless there were a will, nor would grace help if the will were enough. We are commanded to have understanding, where it is said, “Do not be like the horse and the mule, which have no understanding,” and yet we pray to have understanding, where it is said, “Give me understanding, that I may learn your commandments.” We are commanded to have wisdom, where it is said, “You fools, be wise at last,” and yet prayer is made that we may have wisdom, where it is said, “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given him.” We are commanded to have self-control, where it is said: … and yet prayer is made that we may have self-control, where it is said, “When I knew that no one can be continent unless God gives it, and this itself was a mark of wisdom, to know whose gift it was, I went to the Lord and besought him.” Finally, not to go through everything at too great length, we are commanded not to do evil, where it is said, “Turn away from evil,” and yet prayer is made that we may not do evil, where it is said, “But we pray to the Lord that you do nothing evil.” We are commanded to do good, where it is said, “Turn away from evil and do good,” and yet prayer is made that we may do good, where it is said, “We do not cease praying and asking for you”; and among the other things he prays for them, he says, “that you may walk worthily of God, pleasing him in all things, in every good work and word.” So just as we recognize the will when these things are commanded, let him too recognize grace when they are asked for.

### Scripture references

- Ps 32:9 (31:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:73 (118:73 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:8 (93:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 34:14 (33:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 13:7: quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:9–10: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text has a row of dots where the scriptural command of self-control should stand; the quotation is missing and is not supplied.
- Quotations: Ps 32:9 (31:9 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 119:73 (118:73); Ps 94:8 (93:8); Jas 1:5; Wis 8:21 (outside the 66 books); Ps 34:14 (33:15); 2 Cor 13:7; Col 1:9–10 (Latin wording).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.5 (CSEL 44:673–675; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-5).

## Letter 177.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-6
- Source: CSEL 44:675
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops send Pelagius's book On Nature, with Augustine's reply On Nature and Grace, given by Timasius and James.

### Latin text

Misimus reuerentiae tuae librum. quem dederunt quidam religiosi et honesti adulescentes serui dei, quorum etiam nomina non tacemus; nam Timasius et Iacobus uocantur, qui — sicut audiuimus, etiam nosse dignaris — ipsius Pelagii exhortatione spem. quam habebant in saeculo, reliquerunt et nunc continentes deo seruiunt. qui cum eodem errore tandem aliquando per qualemcumque operam nostram domino inspirante caruissent, protulerunt eundem librum Pelagii esse dicentes et, ut ei responderetur, impendio rogauerunt. factum est; ad eosdem rescripta est ipsa responsio; agentes gratias rescripserunt. utrumque misimus. et cui responsum est et quod responsum est, et, ne nimium essemus onerosi, signa fecimus his locis. ubi petimus inspicere non graueris, quem ad modum sibi obiecta quaestione, quod gratiam dei negaret, ita respondit, ut eam esse non diceret nisi naturam, in qua nos condidit deus.

### English translation (Claude)

We have sent Your Reverence a book which was given to us by some devout and honorable young men, servants of God, whose names we do not keep silent; for they are called Timasius and James, who (as we have heard, you also deign to know them) at the exhortation of Pelagius himself abandoned the hopes they had in the world and now serve God in continence. When at last, with the Lord's inspiration, through our efforts such as they were, they had become free of that error, they brought forward this book, saying it was Pelagius's, and urgently asked that it be answered. This was done; the answer was written back to them; they wrote back giving thanks. We have sent both, the work answered and the answer, and, so as not to burden you too much, we have marked the places which we ask you not to mind examining: how, when the question was put to him that he denied the grace of God, he answered in such a way as to say that it is nothing but the nature in which God created us.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence
- Augustine, Nat. et grat. (On Nature and Grace): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The book is Pelagius's On Nature; the answer is Augustine's On Nature and Grace; the letter of thanks is Ep. 168.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.6 (CSEL 44:675; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-6).

## Letter 177.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-7
- Source: CSEL 44:675–677
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The grace proper to Christians is not created nature but the hidden help of the Spirit by which the predestined are called, justified, and glorified.

### Latin text

Si autem hunc esse suum librum negat aut eadem in libro loca, non contendimus; anathemet ea et illam confiteatur apertissime gratiam, quam doctrina Christiana demonstrat et praedicat esse propriam Christianorum, quae non est natura, sed qua saluatur iuuaturque natura non auribus sonante doctrina uel aliquo adiumento uisibili, sicut plantatur quodam modo et inrigatur extrinsecus, sed subministratione spiritus et occulta misericordia, sicut facit ille, qui dat incrementum, deus. etsi enim quadam non inprobanda ratione dicitur gratia dei, qua creati sumus, ut non nihil essemus nec ita essemus aliquid ut cadauer, quod non uiuit, et arbor, quae non sentit, aut pecus, quod non intellegit, sed homines, qui, ut essemus, et uiueremus et sentiremus et intellegeremus et de hoc tanto beneficio creatori nostro gratias agere ualeamus, unde merito et ista gratia dici potest, quia non praecedentium aliquorum operum meritis sed gratuita dei bonitate donata est, alia est tamen. qua praedestinati uocamur, iustificamur, glorificamur, ut dicere possimus: Si deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? qui filio suo proprio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum.

### English translation (Claude)

But if he denies that this book is his, or that those passages are in the book, we do not dispute it; let him anathematize them and confess most openly that grace which Christian teaching shows and preaches to be proper to Christians: which is not nature, but that by which nature is saved and helped, not by teaching sounding in the ears or by some visible aid, as one plants in a way and waters from outside, but by the supply of the Spirit and hidden mercy, as God does, who gives the growth. For although, in a sense not to be rejected, the grace of God is said to be that by which we were created, so that we should not be nothing, nor be something in such a way as a corpse that does not live, a tree that does not perceive, or a beast that does not understand, but human beings, who exist and live and perceive and understand and are able to give thanks to our Creator for so great a benefit (and so this too can rightly be called grace, because it was given not for the merits of any preceding works but by God's free goodness), yet there is another grace, by which, predestined, we are called, justified, and glorified, so that we can say, “If God is for us, who is against us? He who did not spare his own Son, but handed him over for us all.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:6–7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:30–32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 3:6–7; Rom 8:30–32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.7 (CSEL 44:675–677; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-7).

## Letter 177.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-8
- Source: CSEL 44:677–678
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture uses “grace” for the grace that justifies by faith in Christ, not for the grace of creation.

### Latin text

De hac gratia quaestio uertebatur, quando ab his, quos Pelagius grauiter offendebat atque turbabat, dicebatur ei, quod eam suis disputationibus oppugnaret, quibus adsereret non solum ad facienda uerum etiam ad perficienda mandata diuina per liberum arbitrium sibi humanam sufficere naturam. hanc apostolica doctrina gratiam isto nomine appellat, qua saluamur et iustificamur ex fide Christi. de hac scriptum est: Non inritam facio gratiam dei; nam si per legem iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est. de hac scriptum est: Euacuati estis a Christo, qui in lege iustificamini, a gratia excidistis. de hac scriptum est: Si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia. de hac scriptum est: Ei autem, qui operatur, merces non inputatur secundum gratiam sed secundum debitum; ei autem, qui non operatur, credenti autem in eum, qui iustificat impium, deputatur fides eius ad iustitiam et multa alia, quae melius potes ipse meminisse et intellegere prudentius et inlustrius praedicare. illam uero gratiam, qua creati sumus homines, etiamsi ita appellandam non inmerito intellegimus, mirum est tamen, si ita appellatam in ullis legitimis propheticis. euangelicis apostolicisque litteris legimus.

### English translation (Claude)

It was about this grace that the question turned when those whom Pelagius seriously offended and disturbed said to him that he was attacking it by his arguments, in which he asserted that human nature suffices of itself through free choice not only for doing but also for perfecting the divine commandments. The apostles' teaching calls by this name the grace by which we are saved and justified by faith in Christ. Of this it is written: “I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died in vain.” Of this it is written: “You who are justified by the law are cut off from Christ; you have fallen from grace.” Of this it is written: “But if by grace, then no longer by works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.” Of this it is written: “To one who works, the reward is not reckoned according to grace but according to debt; but to one who does not work, but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness”; and much else, which you yourself can better remember, understand more wisely, and preach more brilliantly. But that grace by which we were created human beings, though we understand that it may rightly be called so, it would still be surprising if we read it so called in any of the writings of the law, the prophets, the Gospels, or the apostles.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:4–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Gal 2:21; Gal 5:4; Rom 11:6; Rom 4:4–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.8 (CSEL 44:677–678; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-8).

## Letter 177.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-9
- Source: CSEL 44:678–679
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If grace is only the capacity of nature, the cross is emptied and Christ died in vain.

### Latin text

Cum itaque de hac gratia Christianis fidelibus catholicisque notissima illi obiceretur quaestio, ut eam oppugnare desineret. quid est quod, cum hoc sibi in libro suo uelut ab aduersante persona idem ipse obiecisset, ut se respondendo purgaret. nihil aliud respondit nisi naturam creati hominis referre gratiam creatoris atque ita se dicere sine peccato implere posse iustitiam per liberum arbitrium cum adiutorio diuinae gratiae, quod deus hoc dederit homini ipsa possibilitate naturae? cui merito respondetur: Ergo euacuatum est scandalum crucis. ergo Christus gratis mortuus est. non enim, si non moreretur propter delicta nostra et resurgeret propter iustificationem nostram nec, cum ascendit in altum. captiuans captiuitatem daret dona hominibus, ista naturae possibilitas, quam defendit, non esset in hominibus.

### English translation (Claude)

So when the question was raised against him about this grace, best known to faithful Catholic Christians, that he should stop attacking it, how is it that, when he himself raised this objection against himself in his book, as if from an opponent, so as to clear himself by answering, he replied nothing else than that the nature of created man reflects the grace of the Creator, and that he therefore says that righteousness can be fulfilled without sin through free choice with the help of divine grace, because God has given this to man by the very capacity of nature? To him it is rightly answered: “Then the stumbling block of the cross has been removed; then Christ died in vain.” For even if he had not died for our offenses and risen for our justification, nor, when he ascended on high, leading captivity captive, given gifts to men, this capacity of nature which he defends would still have been in human beings.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:11: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:25: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Gal 5:11; Gal 2:21; Rom 4:25; Eph 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.9 (CSEL 44:678–679; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-9).

## Letter 177.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-10
- Source: CSEL 44:679
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Nature, the law, and the promise all existed before Christ; if they sufficed, Christ died in vain.

### Latin text

An forte dei mandatum deerat et ideo Christus mortuus est? immo iam et hoc erat sanctum et iustum et bonum; iam dictum fuerat: Non concupisces, iam dictum fuerat: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. in quo sermone apostolus omnem legem dicit impleri. et quoniam, nisi diligat deum, nemo diligit se ipsum, ideo dominus in his duobus praeceptis totam legem dicit prophetasque pendere. quae duo praecepta iam erant hominibus diuinitus data. an aeternum praemium iustitiae promissum nondum erat? hoc ipse non dicit, qui in suis litteris posuit etiam in uetere testamento regnum caelorum esse promissum. si ergo ad faciendam perficiendamque iustitiam iam erat naturae possibilitas per liberum arbitrium, iam erat legis dei sanctum, iustum bonumque mandatum, iam erat promissum praemium sempiternum, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est.

### English translation (Claude)

Or was God's commandment perhaps lacking, and was that why Christ died? No, this too already existed, holy and just and good; already it had been said, “You shall not covet”; already it had been said, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” in which word the apostle says the whole law is fulfilled. And since no one loves himself unless he loves God, the Lord says that the whole law and the prophets hang on these two commandments, which had already been given to men by God. Or had the eternal reward of righteousness not yet been promised? He himself does not say this, for he stated in his writings that the kingdom of heaven was promised even in the Old Testament. If, then, the capacity of nature through free choice already existed for doing and perfecting righteousness, if the holy, just, and good commandment of God's law already existed, if the eternal reward had already been promised, then Christ died in vain.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 19:18: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:14: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Rom 7:12; Exod 20:17 (Rom 7:7); Lev 19:18; Gal 5:14; Matt 22:40; Gal 2:21. Pelagius's statement about the Old Testament promise is not identified here.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.10 (CSEL 44:679; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-10).

## Letter 177.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-11
- Source: CSEL 44:679–680
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Righteousness comes only from faith in Christ the one mediator, who remade fallen human nature.

### Latin text

Ergo neque per legem iustitia neque per naturae possibilitatem sed ex fide ac dono dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, unum mediatorem dei et hominum, qui nisi in plenitudine temporis mortuus esset propter delicta nostra et resurrexisset propter iustificationem nostram, profecto et antiquorum fides euacuaretur et nostra. fide uero euacuata quae homini iustitia remaneat, cum iustus ex fide uiuat? ex quo enim per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, procul dubio a corpore mortis huius, ubi alia lex repugnat legi mentis, neminem liberauit aut liberat sua possibilitas, quae perdita redemptore indiget, saucia saluatore, sed gratia dei per fidem unius mediatoris dei et hominum, hominis Christi Iesu, qui et deus cum esset, hominem fecit et manens deus homo factus refecit ipse, quod fecit.

### English translation (Claude)

So righteousness comes neither through the law nor through the capacity of nature, but from faith and the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, the one mediator between God and men. Had he not died in the fullness of time for our offenses and risen for our justification, surely the faith of the ancients would have been emptied, and ours too. And once faith is emptied, what righteousness remains to man, since the righteous lives by faith? For ever since sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and so passed to all men, in whom all sinned, without doubt no one has been freed, or is freed, from the body of this death, where another law wars against the law of the mind, by his own capacity, which, being lost, needs a redeemer, and, being wounded, a savior; but by the grace of God through faith in the one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who, being God, made man, and, remaining God, being made man, himself remade what he had made.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:25: allusion, high confidence
- Hab 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:23–24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Tim 2:5; Gal 4:4; Rom 4:25; Hab 2:4 (Rom 1:17); Rom 5:12; Rom 7:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.11 (CSEL 44:679–680; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-11).

## Letter 177.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-12
- Source: CSEL 44:680–681
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The righteous of old were saved by the same faith in Christ, hidden then and revealed now, as shown by Abraham and Melchizedek.

### Latin text

Puto autem, quod eum lateat fidem Christi, quae postea in reuelationem uenit, in occulto fuisse temporibus patrum nostrorum, per quam tamen etiam ipsi dei gratia liberati sunt. quicumque omnibus generis humani temporibus liberari potuerunt occulto iudicio dei, non tamen uituperabili. unde dicit apostolus: Habentes autem eundem spiritum fidei - utique eundem, quem et illi —, secundum quod scriptum est: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum, et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. inde est, quod ait ipse mediator: Abraham concupiuit uidere diem meum et uidit et gauisus est; inde Melchisedech prolato sacramento mensae dominicae nouit aeternum eius sacerdotium figurare.

### English translation (Claude)

But I think he is unaware that the faith of Christ, which later came to be revealed, was hidden in the times of our fathers, and yet through it they too were freed by the grace of God: all who in all the ages of the human race could be freed by the hidden, yet not blameworthy, judgment of God. Hence the apostle says, “Having the same spirit of faith” (certainly the same as they had), “as it is written, ‘I believed, therefore I spoke,’ we too believe, and therefore we also speak.” Hence the Mediator himself says, “Abraham longed to see my day, and he saw it and was glad”; hence Melchizedek, bringing forth the sacrament of the Lord's table, knew how to prefigure his eternal priesthood.

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:23: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:10 (115:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 8:56: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 14:18: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 7:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Gal 3:23; 2 Cor 4:13; Ps 116:10 (115:1 LXX/Vulgate); John 8:56; Gen 14:18; Heb 7. The bread and wine of Melchizedek are read as a figure of the Eucharist, as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.12 (CSEL 44:680–681; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-12).

## Letter 177.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-13
- Source: CSEL 44:681–682
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law was given to reveal and increase sin so that people would seek the grace of God's promises.

### Latin text

Iam uero data in litteris lege, quam dicit apostolus subintrasse, ut abundaret delictum, et de qua dicit: Si ergo ex lege hereditas, iam non ex promissione; Abrahae autem per repromissionem donauit deus. quid ergo lex? transgressionis gratia proposita est, donec ueniret semen, cui promissum est dispositum per angelos in manu mediatoris. mediator autem unius non est, deus autem unus est. lex ergo aduersus promissa dei? absit. si enim data esset lex, quae posset uiuificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia. sed conclusit scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus. nonne satis ostenditur hoc actum esse per legem, ut peccatum agnosceretur et praeuaricatione augeretur — ubi enim lex non est, nec praeuaricatio — et sic aduersus uictoriam peccati ad diuinam gratiam, quae in promissionibus est, confugeretur atque ita lex non esset aduersus promissa dei, quia ideo per illam fit cognitio peccati et ex praeuaricatione legis abundantia peccati, ut ad liberationem quaerantur promissiones dei, quod est gratia dei, et incipiat esse in homine iustitia non sua sed dei, hoc est data dono dei?

### English translation (Claude)

And then the law was given in writing, which the apostle says came in so that the offense might abound, and of which he says: “For if the inheritance is from the law, it is no longer from the promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise. Why then the law? It was set forth for the sake of transgression, until the offspring should come to whom the promise was made, ordained through angels by the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator is not of one, but God is one. Is the law then against the promises of God? By no means. For if a law had been given that could give life, righteousness would indeed be from the law. But Scripture has shut up all things under sin, so that the promise might be given from faith in Jesus Christ to those who believe.” Is it not shown clearly enough that this was done through the law: that sin might be recognized and increased by transgression (“for where there is no law, there is no transgression”), and so, against the victory of sin, refuge might be taken in the divine grace that is in the promises; and that thus the law is not against the promises of God, because through it comes knowledge of sin and from transgression of the law an abundance of sin, so that the promises of God, which is the grace of God, may be sought for deliverance, and righteousness may begin to exist in man, not his own but God's, that is, given by God's gift?

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 3:18–22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:15: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 5:20; Gal 3:18–22; Rom 4:15. Allusion: Phil 3:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.13 (CSEL 44:681–682; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-13).

## Letter 177.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-14
- Source: CSEL 44:682–683
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Grace was hidden under the law like the dew in Gideon's fleece and is now manifest; those who rely on their own righteousness repeat Israel's error.

### Latin text

Quam etiam nunc quidam, sicut tunc de Iudaeis dictum est, ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. per legem quippe et illi iustificari se arbitrantur sufficiente sibi ad eam custodiendam libero arbitrio, hoc est iustitia sua prolata ex natura humana, non donata ex gratia diuina, propter quod iustitia dei dicitur. unde item scriptum est: Per legem enim cognitio peccati; nunc autem sine lege iustitia dei manifestata est testificata per legem et prophetas. cum dicit manifestata est, ostendit, quia et tunc erat sed tamquam illa pluuia, quam Gedeon impetrauit, tunc uelut in uellere occulta nunc autem uelut in area manifesta. cum ergo lex sine gratia non mors peccati potuisset esse sed uirtus — sic enim dictum est: Aculeus mortis peccatum, uirtus autem peccati lex —, sicut confugiunt multi a facie regnantis peccati ad gratiam uelut in area nunc patentem, ita pauci ad eam confugiebant uelut in uellere tunc latentem. haec uero temporum distributio refertur ad altitudinem diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei, de qua dictum est: Quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius!

### English translation (Claude)

Even now some, as was said then of the Jews, being ignorant of God's righteousness and wishing to establish their own, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. For they too think they are justified through the law, with free choice sufficing them for keeping it, that is, by their own righteousness produced from human nature, not given by divine grace, which is why it is called the righteousness of God. Hence it is also written: “For through the law comes knowledge of sin; but now, apart from the law, the righteousness of God has been manifested, attested by the law and the prophets.” When he says, “has been manifested,” he shows that it existed then too, but like that rain which Gideon obtained, then hidden as in the fleece, now manifest as on the threshing floor. So, since the law without grace could be not the death of sin but its power (for so it was said: “The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law”), just as many now flee from the face of reigning sin to grace, lying open as on the threshing floor, so few fled to it then, hidden as in the fleece. This distribution of times belongs to the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God, of which it was said: “How unsearchable are his judgments, and how inscrutable his ways!”

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:20–21: quotation, high confidence
- Judg 6:36–40: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:56: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Rom 10:3; Rom 3:20–21; Judg 6:36–40; 1 Cor 15:56; Rom 11:33. The comparison with “the Jews” follows Rom 10:3; translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.14 (CSEL 44:682–683; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-14).

## Letter 177.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-15
- Source: CSEL 44:683–685
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops ask that Pelagius be made to condemn his book, and forward through the pope a letter of Augustine to Pelagius.

### Latin text

Quapropter, si et ante tempus legis et tempore ipso legis iustos patres ex fide uiuentes non possibilitas naturae infirmae et indiguae ac uitiatae et sub peccato uenundatae sed dei gratia per fidem iustificabat et nunc eadem in apertum iam ueniens reuelata iustificat, anathemet ergo Pelagius scripta sua, ubi contra eam etsi non per contumaciam tamen per ignorantiam disputat possibilitatem defendendo naturae ad uincenda peccata et implenda mandata, aut, si ea esse sua negat aut scriptis suis ab inimicis suis dicit inmissa, quae sua esse negat, anathemet ea tamen et damnet paterna exhortatione et auctoritate sanctimoniae tuae. si uult, onerosum sibi et perniciosum discat ecclesiae scandalum auferre, quod scandalum auditores et in peruersum dilectores eius usque quaque spargere non quiescunt. si enim cognouerint eundem librum, quem illius uel putant esse uel norunt, episcoporum catholicorum auctoritate et maxime sanctitatis tuae, quam apud eum esse maioris ponderis minime dubitamus. ab eodem ipso anathematum atque damnatum, non eos ulterius aestimamus ausuros loquendo contra gratiam dei, quae reuelata est per passionem et resurrectionem Christi, pectora fidelia et simpliciter Christiana turbare, sed potius adiuuante misericordia domini concertantibus nobiscum caritate ac pietate flagrantibus orationibus tuis, non solum ut in aeternum beati, uerum etiam ut iusti et sancti sint, non in sua uirtute sed in eadem gratia confisuros. unde et ad ipsum scriptam ab uno nostrum epistulam, ad quem per quendam orientalem diaconum ciuem autem Hipponiensem tamquam purgationis suae quaedam scripta transmisit, tuae beatitudini potius credidimus dirigendam melius iudicantes et petentes, ut eam ei mittere ipse digneris; sic enim eam legere potius non dedignabitur magis in illa eum, qui misit, quam qui scripsit, adtendens.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, if both before the time of the law and in the time of the law itself the righteous fathers, living by faith, were justified not by the capacity of a nature that is weak, needy, corrupted, and sold under sin, but by the grace of God through faith, and now that same grace, coming into the open, justifies as revealed, then let Pelagius anathematize his writings in which, if not from obstinacy then from ignorance, he argues against it by defending the capacity of nature to overcome sins and fulfill the commandments; or, if he denies that they are his, or says that writings he denies are his were inserted among his own by his enemies, let him nevertheless anathematize and condemn them at the fatherly exhortation and by the authority of Your Holiness. If he is willing, let him learn to remove a scandal burdensome to himself and pernicious to the church, a scandal which his hearers and those who love him perversely do not cease to spread everywhere. For if they learn that this book, which they either think or know to be his, has been anathematized and condemned by him himself on the authority of Catholic bishops, and above all of Your Holiness, which we have no doubt carries greater weight with him, we do not think they will dare any longer, by speaking against the grace of God revealed through the passion and resurrection of Christ, to trouble faithful and simply Christian hearts; rather, with the help of the Lord's mercy, through your prayers burning with love and piety as you strive together with us, they will trust, not in their own strength but in that same grace, not only to be blessed forever but also to be righteous and holy. For this reason we have thought it better to direct to Your Blessedness a letter written by one of us to Pelagius himself, who had sent him, through an Eastern deacon who is a citizen of Hippo, certain writings as a kind of self-defense; judging it better, and asking, that you yourself be so good as to send it to him; for so he will be less disdainful of reading it, paying more attention in it to the one who sent it than to the one who wrote it.

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 7:14. The letter “by one of us” to Pelagius is presumably by Augustine; its identification is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.15 (CSEL 44:683–685; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-15).

## Letter 177.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-16
- Source: CSEL 44:685–686
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The claim that one can be sinless in this life is refuted from Zechariah's priestly sacrifices for his own sins and the Lord's Prayer.

### Latin text

Illud uero, quod dicunt posse hominem esse sine peccato et mandata dei facile custodire, si uelit, quamuis, cum hoc per adiutorium gratiae, quae tamen per incarnationem unigeniti eius reuelata atque donata est, dicitur, tolerabilius dici uideatur, tamen, quoniam non inmerito mouere potest, ubi et quando per eandem gratiam id efficiatur in nobis, ut sine ullo prorsus peccato simus, utrum in hac uita, quando caro concupiscit aduersus spiritum, an uero in illa, cum fiet sermo, qui scriptus est: Ubi est, mors, uictoria tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? aculeus enim mortis est peccatum, diligentius pertractandum propter alios quosdam, qui inique senserunt atque in suis litteris memoriae mandauerunt etiam in hac uita esse posse hominem sine peccato non ab initio natiuitatis suae sed conuersione a peccatis ad iustitiam et a uita reproba ad bonam uitam. sic enim intellexerunt, quod de Zacharia et Elisabeth scriptum est ambulasse eos in omnibus iustificationibus domini sine querela. hoc, quod dictum est sine querela, sine peccato dictum acceperunt non quidem negantes immo etiam, quod aliis locis in litteris eorum inuenitur, pie confitentes adiutorium gratiae domini nostri non per naturalem spiritum hominis sed per principalem spiritum dei. qui parum uidentur considerasse ipsum Zachariam fuisse utique sacerdotem; omnes autem tunc sacerdotes necesse habebant ex lege dei primitus pro peccatis suis offerre sacrificium, deinde pro populi. sicut ergo nunc per orationis sacrificium conuincimur non esse sine peccato, quoniam iussi sumus dicere: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, ita et tunc per sacrificia uictimarum animalium conuincebantur sacerdotes sine peccato non esse, qui pro suis peccatis iubebantur offerre.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what they say, that a person can be without sin and keep God's commandments easily if he wishes: although this seems more tolerable to say when it is said to be by the help of grace (grace revealed and given through the incarnation of God's only-begotten Son), yet, since one may not unreasonably ask where and when it is brought about in us by that same grace that we are without any sin at all (whether in this life, when the flesh lusts against the spirit, or in that life, when the saying that is written shall come to pass, “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting? The sting of death is sin”), it must be treated more carefully, because of certain others who have held wrongly and committed to writing that even in this life a person can be without sin, not from the beginning of his birth but by conversion from sins to righteousness and from a reprobate life to a good one. For this is how they understood what is written of Zechariah and Elizabeth, that they walked in all the ordinances of the Lord without complaint. They took “without complaint” to mean “without sin,” not denying, but even, as is found in other places in their writings, devoutly confessing the help of the grace of our Lord, not through man's natural spirit but through the sovereign Spirit of God. They seem to have paid too little attention to the fact that Zechariah was certainly a priest; and all priests at that time were obliged by God's law first to offer sacrifice for their own sins, then for the people's. So, just as we are now convicted by the sacrifice of prayer of not being without sin, since we have been commanded to say, “Forgive us our debts,” so then too the priests were convicted by the sacrifices of animal victims of not being without sin, since they were commanded to offer for their own sins.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54–56: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:6: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 9:7: allusion, medium confidence
- Heb 7:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Gal 5:17; 1 Cor 15:54–56; Luke 1:6; Lev 9:7 and Heb 7:27; Matt 6:12. The “certain others” are not named; uncertain who is meant.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.16 (CSEL 44:685–686; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-16).

## Letter 177.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-17
- Source: CSEL 44:686–687
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: “Whoever is born of God does not sin” refers to love, which grows in this life while desire remains until it is extinguished in the next.

### Latin text

Quod si res ita se habet, ut per gratiam saluatoris proficiamus quidem in hac uita deficiente cupiditate caritate crescente, perficiamur autem in illa uita cupiditate extincta caritate completa, profecto illud, quod scriptum est: Qui natus est ex deo, non peccat, secundum ipsam caritatem dictum est, quae sola non peccat. ad natiuitatem quippe, quae ex deo est, augenda et perficienda caritas pertinet, non ea quae minuenda est et consumenda cupiditas, quae tamen quam diu est in membris nostris, lege quadam sua repugnat legi mentis; sed natus ex deo nec oboediens desideriis eius nec exhibens membra sua arma iniquitatis peccato potest dicere: Iam non ego operor illud sed id, quod habitat in me peccatum.

### English translation (Claude)

If the case is this, that through the Savior's grace we make progress in this life, as desire wanes and love grows, but are made perfect in that life, when desire is extinguished and love completed, then surely what is written, “Whoever is born of God does not sin,” was said with respect to love itself, which alone does not sin. For to the birth that is from God belongs love, which is to be increased and perfected, not desire, which is to be diminished and consumed; yet as long as desire is in our members, it wars by a law of its own against the law of the mind. But one born of God, neither obeying its desires nor presenting his members to sin as weapons of iniquity, can say, “It is no longer I who do it, but the sin that dwells in me.”

### Scripture references

- 1 John 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:12–13: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 John 3:9; Rom 7:23; Rom 6:12–13; Rom 7:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.17 (CSEL 44:686–687; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-17).

## Letter 177.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-18
- Source: CSEL 44:687–688
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To hope for sinlessness by grace is a tolerable error; but no believer may claim not to need “forgive us our debts.”

### Latin text

Sed quoquo modo se habeat ista quaestio, quia, etsi non inuenitur homo in hac uita sine peccato, id tamen dicitur posse fieri per adiutorium gratiae et spiritus dei, quod ut fiat, conandum atque poscendum est, tolerabiliter in id quisque fallitur nec diabolica impietas sed error humanus est elaboranda et optanda adfirmare, etiamsi, quod adfirmat, non possit ostendere; id enim credit fieri posse, quod certe laudabile est uelle. nobis autem sufficit, quod nullus in ecclesia dei fidelium reperitur in quolibet prouectu excellentiaque iustitiae, qui sibi audeat dicere non necessariam precationem orationis dominicae: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. et dicat se non habere peccatum nec se ipsum decipiat et in eo ueritas non sit, quamuis iam sine querela uiuat. non enim qualecumque etiam temptationis humanae sed graue peccatum est, quod in querelam uenit.

### English translation (Claude)

But however this question stands, since, though no one is found in this life without sin, it is still said that this can come about by the help of the grace and Spirit of God (and that it may come about we must strive and pray), anyone mistaken in this is mistaken tolerably; and it is not diabolical impiety but human error to assert what must be worked for and desired, even if one cannot show what he asserts; for he believes possible what it is certainly praiseworthy to want. For us it is enough that no believer is found in God's church, at whatever stage of progress and excellence in righteousness, who would dare to say that the petition of the Lord's Prayer, “Forgive us our debts,” is not necessary for him, and say that he has no sin, lest he deceive himself and the truth not be in him, even though he already lives without complaint. For what brings complaint is not any sin of human temptation whatever, but grave sin.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 1:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Matt 6:12; 1 John 1:8; Luke 1:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.18 (CSEL 44:687–688; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-18).

## Letter 177.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-19
- Source: CSEL 44:688–689
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The bishops leave the rest to the pope's judgment and ask him to confirm that they share the same faith in grace.

### Latin text

Cetera, quae illi obiecta sunt, sicut gestis defensa peruiderit, ita de his procul dubio tua beatitudo iudicabit. dabit sane nobis ueniam suauitas mitissima cordis tui, quod prolixiorem epistulam fortassis, quam uelles, tuae misimus sanctitati. non enim riuulum nostrum tuo largo fonti augendo refundimus. sed in hac non parua temptatione temporis, unde nos liberet, cui dicimus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, utrum etiam noster licet exiguus ex eodem, quo etiam tuus abundans, emanet capite fluentorum, hoc a te probari uolumus tuisque rescriptis de communi participatione unius gratiae consolari.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the other things charged against him, Your Blessedness will without doubt judge of them according to how you find them defended in the proceedings. The most gentle kindness of your heart will surely pardon us for having sent Your Holiness a letter perhaps longer than you would wish. For we are not pouring back our little stream to swell your abundant fountain; but in this not small temptation of the times, from which may he deliver us to whom we say, “Lead us not into temptation,” we wish you to confirm whether our stream too, small as it is, flows from the same head of waters as your abundant one, and to console us by your reply about our common share in the one grace.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 6:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 177.19 (CSEL 44:688–689; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-177-19).

## Letter 178.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-1
- Source: CSEL 44:689–690
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Bishop Hilary of a new heresy (Pelagianism) that limits grace to creation, law, and forgiveness of past sins, and denies infants need baptism.

### Latin text

Honorabilis filius noster Palladius cum de nostro litore nauigaret, beneficium poscendo magis dedit, ut non solum eum benignitati tuae uerum etiam me ipsum tuis orationibus commendarem, domine beatissime et in Christi caritate uenerande frater. quod cum facio, profecto et sanctitas tua faciet, quod de te ambo praesumimus. quae autem circa nos sint, quoniam scio dilectionem uestram pro nobis sicut et nostram pro uobis esse sollicitam, a memorato perlatore audiet sanctitas tua. uerum tamen, quod maxime necessarium est, breuiter dicam. noua quaedam haeresis inimica gratiae Christi contra ecclesiam Christi conatur exsurgere, sed nondum euidenter ab ecclesia separata est, hominum scilicet, qui tantum audent infirmitati humanae tribuere potestatis, ut hoc solum ad dei gratiam pertinere contendant, quod cum libero arbitrio et non peccandi possibilitate creati sumus et dei mandata, quae a nobis implerentur, accepimus; ceterum ad. eadem mandata. seruanda et implenda nullo diuino adiutorio nos egere. necessariam uero nobis esse remissionem peccatorum, quia ea, quae a nobis in praeteritum male facta sunt, infecta facere non ualemus. cauendis autem futuris uincendisque peccatis omnibusque temptationibus uirtute superandis sine ullo deinceps adiutorio gratiae dei naturali possibilitate humanam sufficere uoluntatem. nec paruulos indigere gratia saluatoris, qua per eius baptismum a perditione liberentur, eo, quod nullum ex Adam contagium damnationis traxerint.

### English translation (Claude)

When our honorable son Palladius was sailing from our shore, by asking a favor he rather conferred one, since he gave me the opportunity to commend not only him to your kindness but also myself to your prayers, most blessed lord and brother venerable in the love of Christ. As I do this, Your Holiness will certainly do what we both presume of you. How things stand with us, since I know your love is concerned for us as ours is for you, Your Holiness will hear from the bearer I have mentioned. Yet I will say briefly what is most necessary. A certain new heresy, hostile to the grace of Christ, is trying to rise up against the church of Christ, though it has not yet been clearly separated from the church: the heresy of men who dare to attribute so much power to human weakness that they maintain that only this belongs to the grace of God: that we were created with free choice and the possibility of not sinning, and received God's commandments to be fulfilled by us; but that for keeping and fulfilling these commandments we need no divine help. The forgiveness of sins, they say, is indeed necessary for us, because we cannot make undone the evil we have done in the past; but for guarding against future sins, overcoming them, and conquering all temptations by strength, the human will suffices by its natural capacity, without any further help from the grace of God. Nor, they say, do little children need the grace of the Savior, by which they are freed from perdition through his baptism, because they have contracted no contagion of condemnation from Adam.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to a bishop Hilary (perhaps Hilary of Narbonne; the identification is uncertain).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 178.1 (CSEL 44:689–690; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-1).

## Letter 178.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-2
- Source: CSEL 44:690
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that the councils of Carthage and Numidia have written to Pope Innocent against the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Quam sint haec inimica dei gratiae. quae per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum humano generi indulta est, et quem ad modum totius fidei Christianae fundamenta euertere moliantur, peruidet nobiscum uenerabilitas uestra. neque apud uos tacere debuimus, ut eius modi homines, quos quidem sanari in ecclesia quam ex illa resecari magis uolumus et optamus. cura pastorali caueatis. iam enim cum ista scriberemus, cognoueramus in ecclesia Carthaginensi aduersus eos episcopalis concilii conditum fuisse decretum per epistulam sancto et uenerabili papae Innocentio dirigendum et nos de concilio Numidiae ad eandem apostolicam sedem iam similiter scripseramus.

### English translation (Claude)

How hostile these things are to the grace of God, which has been granted to the human race through Jesus Christ our Lord, and how they strive to overthrow the foundations of the whole Christian faith, Your Reverence sees together with us. Nor ought we to be silent before you, so that with pastoral care you may beware of men of this kind, whom we would rather see healed within the church than cut off from it, and this is what we wish and pray for. For already, when we were writing this, we had learned that in the church of Carthage a decree of a council of bishops had been drawn up against them, to be sent by letter to the holy and venerable Pope Innocent; and we too, from the council of Numidia, had already written likewise to the same apostolic see.

### Translation notes

- The letters are Epp. 175 and 176.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 178.2 (CSEL 44:690; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-2).

## Letter 178.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-3
- Source: CSEL 44:690–691
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The heresy empties the Lord's Prayer, claiming one can become sinless and overcome temptation by nature alone.

### Latin text

Omnes enim, qui spem habemus in Christo, huic pestiferae impietati resistere eamque concorditer damnare et anathematizare debemus. quae contradicit etiam orationibus nostris concedens quidem, ut dicamus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. et hoc ita concedens, ut adserat hominem in hoc corruptibili corpore, quod adgrauat animam, posse suis uiribus ad tantam iustitiam peruenire, ut neque illi hoc sit dicere necessarium: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. illud uero, quod sequitur: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, non sic accipiunt. tamquam deus orandus sit, quo nos ad superandas temptationes adiuuet peccatorum, sed ne quisquam inruens corporaliter nos humanus casus affligat. quoniam peccatorum temptationes uincere ita sit iam in nostra positum potestate possibilitate naturae, ut hoc inaniter impetrandum orantibus arbitremur. non possumus una epistula breui omnia uel plurima tantae impietatis argumenta colligere, praesertim quia, cum ista scriberem, perlatores nauigaturi me inmorari diutius non sinebant. puto autem onerosum me non fuisse sanctis sensibus tuis, quod de tanto malo omni uigilantia domino adiuuante uitando tacere non potui.

### English translation (Claude)

For all of us who have hope in Christ ought to resist this pestilent impiety and condemn and anathematize it with one accord. It contradicts even our prayers. It does grant that we say, “Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors,” but grants it in such a way as to assert that a person, in this corruptible body which weighs down the soul, can by his own powers reach such righteousness that it is not even necessary for him to say, “Forgive us our debts.” And what follows, “Lead us not into temptation,” they do not take as if God should be asked to help us overcome the temptations of sins, but that no human mishap should strike and afflict us bodily; since to overcome the temptations of sins is, they hold, so placed in our power by the capacity of nature that we should consider it vain to ask for it in prayer. We cannot gather in one short letter all, or most, of the arguments of so great an impiety, especially since, as I wrote this, the bearers, about to sail, would not let me linger longer. But I think I have not been burdensome to your holy mind in not being able to keep silent about so great an evil, which must be avoided with all vigilance, with the Lord's help.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:12–13: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 6:12–13; Wis 9:15 (outside the 66 books).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 178.3 (CSEL 44:690–691; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/177-1/#p-178-3).

## Letter 179.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-1
- Source: CSEL 44:691–692
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to John, bishop of Jerusalem, asking him to show his love for Pelagius by not being deceived by him.

### Latin text

Quod tuae sanctitatis scripta non merui, nihil audeo suscensere; melius enim perlatorem credo defuisse, quam me suspicor a tua ueneratione contemptum, domine beatissime et merito uenerabilis frater. nunc uero, quoniam seruum dei Lucam, per quem ista direxi, cito comperi esse rediturum, agam domino et tuae benignitati uberes gratias, si me litteris fueris uisitare dignatus. Pelagium uero fratrem nostrum, filium tuum, quem audio quod multum diligis, hanc illi suggero exhibeas dilectionem, ut homines, qui eum nouerunt et diligenter audierunt, non ab eo tuam sanctitatem existiment falli.

### English translation (Claude)

That I have not been favored with a letter from Your Holiness, I dare not resent at all; for I would rather believe that a bearer was lacking than suspect that I am despised by Your Reverence, most blessed lord and deservedly venerable brother. But now, since I have learned that the servant of God Luke, by whom I have sent this, will soon return, I shall give abundant thanks to the Lord and to your kindness if you deign to visit me with a letter. As for our brother Pelagius, your son, whom I hear you love much, I suggest that you show him this love: that people who know him and have listened to him carefully may not think that Your Holiness is deceived by him.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to John, bishop of Jerusalem, who had presided over the inquiry into Pelagius at Jerusalem in 415.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.1 (CSEL 44:691–692; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-1).

## Letter 179.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-2
- Source: CSEL 44:692
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells how two of Pelagius's disciples gave him Pelagius's book, which he answered.

### Latin text

Nam quidam ex discipulis eius adulescentes honestissime nati et institutis liberalibus eruditi spem, quam habebant in saeculo, eius exhortatione dimiserunt et se ad dei seruitium contulerunt. in quibus tamen cum apparuissent quaedam sanae doctrinae aduersantia, quae saluatoris euangelio continetur et apostolicis sermonibus declaratur, id est cum inuenirentur contra dei gratiam disputari, propter quam Christiani sumus et in qua spiritu ex fide spem iustitiae expectamus, et admonitionibus nostris inciperent emendari, dederunt mihi librum, quem eiusdem Pelagii esse dixerunt, rogantes. ut ei potius responderem. quod posteaquam uidi me facere debere, ut eo modo error ipse nefarius de cordibus eorum perfectius auferretur, legi atque respondi

### English translation (Claude)

For some of his disciples, young men of very honorable birth and educated in the liberal arts, at his exhortation gave up the hopes they had in the world and devoted themselves to the service of God. But when certain things appeared in them contrary to the sound doctrine contained in the Savior's Gospel and declared in the apostles' words, that is, when they were found arguing against the grace of God, by which we are Christians and in which by the Spirit, from faith, we await the hope of righteousness, and when they began to be corrected by our admonitions, they gave me a book which they said was Pelagius's, asking me to answer it. When I saw that I ought to do this, so that the wicked error itself might be more thoroughly removed from their hearts in this way, I read it and replied.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:5: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence
- Augustine, Nat. et grat. (On Nature and Grace): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The young men are Timasius and James (cf. Epp. 168, 177.6); the reply is On Nature and Grace. Allusion: Gal 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.2 (CSEL 44:692; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-2).

## Letter 179.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-3
- Source: CSEL 44:692–693
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius's book identifies grace with created nature and leaves no room for the help of God sought in prayer.

### Latin text

In hoc libro ille dei gratiam non appellat nisi naturam. qua libero arbitrio conditi sumus. illam uero, quam innumerabilibus testimoniis sancta scriptura commendat ea nos iustificari, hoc est iustos fieri docens et in omni opere bono siue agendo siue perficiendo dei misericordia iuuari. quod etiam orationes sanctorum apertissime ostendunt, quibus ea petuntur a domino, quae praecipiuntur a domino, hanc ergo gratiam non solum tacet, sed ei contraria multa loquitur. adfirmat enim uehementerque contendit per solum liberum arbitrium sibi humanam sufficere posse naturam ad operandam iustitiam et omnia dei mandata seruanda. unde quis non uideat, cum eundem librum legerit, quem ad modum oppugnetur gratia dei, de qua dicit apostolus: Miser ego homo! quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum. et nullus locus diuino adiutorio relinquatur, propter quod orantes dicere debeamus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem, sine causa etiam dominus apostolo Petro dixisse uideatur: Rogaui pro te, ne deficiat fides tua, si hoc totum in nobis nullo auxilio dei sed potestate uoluntatis impletur?

### English translation (Claude)

In this book he calls the grace of God nothing but the nature in which we were created with free choice. But that grace which Holy Scripture commends with countless testimonies, teaching that by it we are justified, that is, made righteous, and are helped by God's mercy in every good work, whether in doing or in perfecting it (as the prayers of the saints also show most plainly, in which things are asked of the Lord that are commanded by the Lord): this grace he not only passes over in silence, but says many things contrary to it. For he affirms and vehemently argues that human nature can suffice of itself through free choice alone for working righteousness and keeping all God's commandments. Hence who, on reading the book, would not see how the grace of God is attacked, of which the apostle says, “Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through our Lord Jesus Christ”; and that no place is left for divine help, for the sake of which we must say in prayer, “Lead us not into temptation”; and that the Lord too would seem to have said to the apostle Peter without cause, “I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail,” if all this is accomplished in us by no aid from God but by the power of the will?

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:24–25: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 22:32: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 7:24–25; Matt 6:13; Luke 22:32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.3 (CSEL 44:692–693; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-3).

## Letter 179.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-4
- Source: CSEL 44:693
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagian teaching contradicts the church's blessings and Paul's prayers and statements about the Spirit's help.

### Latin text

His itaque disputationibus peruersis et impiis non solum contradicitur orationibus nostris, quibus a domino petimus. quicquid sanctos petisse legimus et tenemus, uerum etiam benedictionibus nostris resistitur, quando super populum dicimus optantes eis et poscentes a domino, ut eos abundare faciat in caritate inuicem et in omnes et det eis secundum diuitias gloriae suae uirtute corroborari per spiritum eius et impleat eos omni gaudio et pace in credendo et abundent in spe et potentia spiritus sancti. ut quid eis ista petimus, quae populis a domino petisse apostolum nouimus, si iam natura nostra creata cum libero arbitrio omnia haec sibi potest sua uoluntate praestare? ut quid etiam dicit idem ipse apostolus: Quotquot enim spiritu dei aguntur, hi filii sunt dei, si spiritu naturae nostrae agimur, ut efficiamur filii dei? ut quid dicit similiter: Spiritus adiuuat infirmitatem nostram, si natura nostra sic creata est. ut spiritu ad opera iustitiae non indigeat adiuuari? ut quid scriptum est: Fidelis autem deus, qui non permittet uos temptari super id, quod potestis, sed faciet cum temptatione etiam exitum, ut possitis sustinere, si iam ita conditi sumus, ut uiribus liberi arbitrii uniuersas temptationes sustinendo superare possimus?

### English translation (Claude)

So by these perverse and impious arguments not only are our prayers contradicted, in which we ask of the Lord whatever we read and hold that the saints asked, but our blessings too are opposed, when we say over the people, wishing it for them and asking the Lord, that he make them abound in love toward one another and toward all, and grant them, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with power through his Spirit, and fill them with all joy and peace in believing, that they may abound in hope and in the power of the Holy Spirit. Why do we ask these things for them, which we know the apostle asked of the Lord for the peoples, if our nature, created with free choice, can already supply all these things to itself by its own will? Why too does the same apostle say, “For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God,” if we are led by the spirit of our own nature to become sons of God? Why does he likewise say, “The Spirit helps our weakness,” if our nature was so created that it does not need to be helped by the Spirit for works of righteousness? Why is it written, “But God is faithful, who will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear, but with the temptation will also make a way out, so that you can endure it,” if we were already so made that by the powers of free choice we can overcome all temptations by enduring them?

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 3:12: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 3:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 15:13: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Thess 3:12; Eph 3:16; Rom 15:13; Rom 8:14; Rom 8:26; 1 Cor 10:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.4 (CSEL 44:693; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-4).

## Letter 179.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-5
- Source: CSEL 44:693–694
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends John both books so that he may see what Pelagius means by grace and lead him to confess true grace.

### Latin text

Quid pluribus agam apud sanctitatem uestram, quando quidem me onerosum sentio, maxime quia per interpretem audis litteras meas? si diligitis Pelagium, diligat uos etiam ipse, immo magis se ipsum et non uos fallat. cum enim auditis eum confiteri gratiam dei et adiutorium dei, putatis hoc eum dicere, quod et uos, qui catholica regula sapitis, quoniam, quid in libro suo scripserit, ignoratis. propter hoc ipsum librum misi et meum, quo ei respondi; unde perspiciat uenerabilitas uestra, quam gratiam uel adiutorium dei dicat, quando illi obicitur, quod gratiae dei et adiutorio contradicat. proinde ostende illi docendo et hortando et pro eius salute, quae in Christo esse debet, orando, ut eam dei gratiam confiteatur, quam probantur sancti dei fuisse confessi, cum a domino ea ipsi peterent, quae illis iubebat ut facerent, quoniam neque iuberentur, nisi ut nostra uoluntas ostenderetur, neque peterentur, nisi ut uoluntatis infirmitas ab illo, qui iusserat, iuuaretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Why should I say more to Your Holiness, since I feel I am burdensome, especially as you hear my letter through an interpreter? If you love Pelagius, let him too love you, or rather himself, and not deceive you. For when you hear him confess the grace of God and the help of God, you think he means what you mean, who think according to the Catholic rule, because you do not know what he has written in his book. For this reason I have sent the book itself and mine in which I answered him; from these Your Reverence may see what he calls the grace or help of God when it is charged against him that he contradicts the grace and help of God. So show him, by teaching and exhorting and by praying for his salvation, which ought to be in Christ, that he should confess that grace of God which the saints of God are proved to have confessed when they asked of the Lord the very things he commanded them to do; for they would neither be commanded except to show our will, nor be asked for except that the weakness of the will might be helped by him who commanded.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence
- Augustine, Nat. et grat. (On Nature and Grace): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John read Latin through an interpreter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.5 (CSEL 44:693–694; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-5).

## Letter 179.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-6
- Source: CSEL 44:694–695
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius should be asked plainly whether we must pray not to sin and whether infants are freed from original sin by Christ's grace.

### Latin text

Aperte interrogetur, utrum ei placeat orandum esse domino, ne peccemus. quod si ei displicet, legatur in auribus eius apostolus dicens: Oramus autem ad deum, ne quid faciatis mali; si autem placet, aperte praedicet gratiam, qua iuuamur, ne ipse faciat multum mali. hac enim gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum omnes liberantur, quicumque liberantur, quoniam nemo praeter ipsam quolibet alio modo liberari potest. propter hoc scriptum est: Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur, non quia nemo damnabitur, sed quia nemo aliter liberabitur, quia, sicut nulli nisi per Adam filii hominis, ita nulli nisi per Christum filii dei. omnes itaque filii hominis nonnisi per Adam et omnes ex eis filii dei nonnisi per Christum fieri possunt. aperte itaque etiam hinc exprimat, quid sentiat, utrum placeat ei etiam paruulos, qui nondum iustitiam possunt uelle uel nolle, tamen propter unum hominem, per quem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, per Christi gratiam liberari, utrum etiam pro ipsis fusum credat sanguinem Christi propter originale peccatum, qui utique in remissionem fusus est peccatorum. de his maxime ab illo uolumus nosse, quid credat, quid teneat, quid certe confiteatur et praedicet. in aliis autem, quae illi obiciuntur, etiamsi errare conuincitur, tamen, donec. corrigatur, tolerabilius sustinetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let him be asked openly whether he agrees that we must pray to the Lord that we may not sin. If he does not, let the apostle be read in his hearing, saying, “But we pray to God that you do nothing evil”; but if he does agree, let him openly preach the grace by which we are helped, so that he himself may not do much evil. For by this grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord all who are freed are freed, since no one can be freed in any other way apart from it. That is why it is written, “As in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive”: not because no one will be condemned, but because no one will be freed otherwise; because, just as no one is a son of man except through Adam, so no one is a son of God except through Christ. So all sons of men can become such only through Adam, and all of them who become sons of God can become such only through Christ. Let him then state openly on this point too what he thinks: whether he agrees that even little children, who cannot yet will or refuse righteousness, are nevertheless freed through the grace of Christ, because of the one man through whom sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so passed to all men, in whom all sinned; and whether he believes that the blood of Christ, which was certainly shed for the forgiveness of sins, was shed for them too, because of original sin. On these points above all we want to know from him what he believes, what he holds, what he confesses and preaches without ambiguity. In the other matters charged against him, even if he is shown to err, he can be borne more tolerably until he is corrected.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 13:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 2 Cor 13:7; 1 Cor 15:22; Rom 5:12 (Latin “in quo,” “in whom”); Matt 26:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.6 (CSEL 44:694–695; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-6).

## Letter 179.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-7
- Source: CSEL 44:695
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks for the record of the synod that cleared Pelagius and quotes Pelagius's own defense on the possibility of sinlessness.

### Latin text

Peto etiam nobis transmittere, quibus perhibetur esse purgatus, ecclesiastica gesta digneris. quod ex multorum episcoporum desiderio peto, quos mecum de hac re fama incerta perturbat; sed ideo solus hoc scripsi, quia occasionem perlatoris festinantis a nobis, quem cito ad nos audiui posse remeare, praetermittere nolui. pro quibus gestis iam nobis misit non quidem ullam partem gestorum sed quandam a se conscriptam uelut defensionem suam, qua se dixit obiectis respondisse Gallorum. in qua, ut alia omittam, cum ad illud responderet, quod ei obiectum est, eum dixisse posse hominem esse sine peccato et mandata dei custodire, si uelit, diximus, inquit; hanc enim illi deus possibilitatem dedit; non diximus, quoniam inueniatur quis, ab infantia usque ad senectam qui numquam peccauerit, sed quoniam a peccatis conuersus labore proprio et gratia dei adiutus potest absque peccato esse nec propter hoc in posterum erit inconuertibilis.

### English translation (Claude)

I also ask you to be so kind as to send us the church proceedings by which he is said to have been cleared. I ask this at the wish of many bishops who, like me, are troubled by uncertain reports on this matter; but I have written this alone because I did not want to miss the opportunity of a bearer hurrying away from us, who I heard could soon return to us. Instead of these proceedings he has already sent us, not indeed any part of the proceedings, but a kind of defense of himself written by himself, in which he said he had answered the charges of the Gauls. In it, to pass over other things, when he answered the charge that he had said a person can be without sin and keep God's commandments if he wishes, he says: “We did say this; for God has given him this possibility. We did not say that anyone is found who has never sinned from infancy to old age, but that one converted from sins can, by his own effort and helped by the grace of God, be without sin, yet not on that account be unchangeable thereafter.”

### Translation notes

- The proceedings are those of the Synod of Diospolis (415); the charges were brought by the Gallic bishops Heros and Lazarus. Pelagius's defense paper is quoted as Augustine gives it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.7 (CSEL 44:695; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-7).

## Letter 179.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-8
- Source: CSEL 44:695–696
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that Pelagius's book claimed Abel never sinned, contradicting his defense that no one is sinless from infancy.

### Latin text

In hac Pelagii responsione cernit reuerentia tua hoc eum fuisse confessum, priorem hominis uitam, quae est ab infantia, sine peccato non esse, sed eum ad uitam, quae sine peccato sit, labore proprio et adiuto per gratiam dei posse conuerti. cur ergo in hoc libro, cui respondi, Abel ita hic uixisse dicit, ut nihil omnino peccauerit? nam eius de hac re ista sunt uerba: Hoc, inquit, recte dici potest de his, quorum neque bonorum neque malorum scriptura sit memor; de illis uero, quorum iustitiae meminit, et peccatorum sine dubio meminisset, si qua eos peccasse sensisset. sed esto, inquit, aliis temporibus turbae numerositate omnium dissimulauerit peccata contexere, in ipso statim mundi primordio, ubi nonnisi quattuor homines erant, quid, inquit. dicimus, cur non omnium uoluerit delicta memorare? utrumne ingentis multitudinis causa, quae nondum erat? an quia illorum tantum, qui commiserant. meminit. illius uero, qui nulla commiserat, meminisse non potuit? certe, inquit, primo in tempore Adam et Eua, ex quibus Cain et Abel nati sunt, quattuor homines tantum fuisse referuntur. peccauit Eua, scriptura hoc prodidit; Adam quoque deliquit, eadem scriptura non tacuit; sed et Cain peccasse ipsa quoque scriptura testata est. quorum non modo peccata uerum etiam peccatorum indicat qualitatem. quod si et Abel peccasset, inquit, et hoc sine dubio scriptura dixisset; si non dixit, ergo nec ille peccauit.

### English translation (Claude)

In this answer of Pelagius Your Reverence sees that he confessed that a person's earlier life, from infancy, is not without sin, but that he can be converted to a life without sin by his own effort and with the help of God's grace. Why then, in the book I answered, does he say that Abel lived here in such a way that he committed no sin at all? For these are his words on the matter: “This,” he says, “can rightly be said of those whom Scripture mentions neither for good nor for evil; but of those whose righteousness it mentions, it would without doubt have mentioned their sins too, if it had perceived that they sinned in anything. But granted,” he says, “that at other times, because of the great number of the crowd, it refrained from recording the sins of all; at the very beginning of the world, when there were only four people, what,” he says, “shall we say? Why did it not wish to record the faults of all? Was it because of an enormous multitude, which did not yet exist? Or because it recorded only those who had committed sins, and could not record anything of the one who had committed none? Certainly,” he says, “in the first age only four people are reported to have existed: Adam and Eve, from whom Cain and Abel were born. Eve sinned; Scripture has made this known. Adam too transgressed; the same Scripture has not kept silent. And Scripture itself has also testified that Cain sinned; and it indicates not only their sins but also the nature of their sins. But if Abel too had sinned,” he says, “Scripture would without doubt have said this too; if it did not say it, then he did not sin.”

### Scripture references

- Gen 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The passage is quoted from Pelagius's On Nature, as preserved here. Allusions: Gen 3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.8 (CSEL 44:695–696; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-8).

## Letter 179.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-9
- Source: CSEL 44:696–697
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius must either admit original sin in Abel or retract his claim, since his defense implies everyone's early life is sinful.

### Latin text

Haec uerba de libro eius decerpsi, quae in ipso quoque uolumine tua sanctitas poterit inuenire, ut intellegatis, quem ad modum et cetera neganti credere debeatis, nisi forte dicat ipsum Abel nihil peccasse, sed ideo non fuisse sine peccato et ideo non posse domino comparari, qui in carne mortali solus sine peccato fuit, quia erat in Abel originale peccatum, quod de Adam traxerat, non in se ipso ipse commiserat — utinam saltem hoc dicat, ut interim eius de baptismo paruulorum certam sententiam tenere possimus! — aut si forte, quoniam dixit ab infantia usque ad senectutem, ideo dicat Abel non peccasse, quia nec senuisse monstratur. non hoc indicant uerba eius; ab initio priorem uitam dixit peccatricem, posteriorem uero posse esse sine peccato. ait enim non se dixisse, quoniam inueniatur quis, ab infantia usque ad senectutem qui non peccauerit, sed quoniam a peccatis conuersus labore proprio et gratia dei adiutus potest absque peccato esse. cum enim dicit a peccatis conuersus, ostendit priorem uitam in peccatis agi. fateatur ergo. quod peccauerit Abel, cuius prima uita fuit in saeculo. quam fatetur non carere peccatis, et respiciat librum suum, ubi eum dixisse constat, quod ait in hac defensione: Non diximus.

### English translation (Claude)

I have extracted these words from his book, and Your Holiness will be able to find them in the volume itself, so that you may understand how far you should believe him when he denies the rest; unless perhaps he says that Abel himself committed no sin, but was nevertheless not without sin, and so cannot be compared with the Lord, who alone was without sin in mortal flesh, because there was in Abel the original sin which he had contracted from Adam, though he had not committed it in himself. Would that he said at least this, so that meanwhile we might have his definite opinion on the baptism of infants! Or perhaps, since he said “from infancy to old age,” he may say that Abel did not sin because he is not shown to have grown old. His words do not indicate this: he called the earlier life, from the beginning, sinful, and said that the later life can be without sin. For he says that he did not say that anyone is found who has not sinned from infancy to old age, but that one converted from sins can, by his own effort and helped by the grace of God, be without sin. When he says “converted from sins,” he shows that the earlier life is spent in sins. So let him admit that Abel sinned, whose first life was in this world, a life which he admits is not without sins; and let him look back at his book, where it is established that he said what in this defense he says, “We did not say.”

### Scripture references

- Heb 4:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Heb 4:15 (Christ alone without sin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.9 (CSEL 44:696–697; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-9).

## Letter 179.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-10
- Source: CSEL 44:697
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine has witnesses that the book is Pelagius's and asks John to put the matter to him.

### Latin text

Si autem et hunc librum uel hunc in eo libro locum esse negauerit suum, ego quidem idoneos testes habeo honestos et fideles uiros et eius sine dubio dilectores, quibus adtestantibus purgare me possum, quod eundem librum ipsi mihi dederint et ibi hoc legatur eumque Pelagii esse dixerint, ut saltem hoc mihi sufficiat, ne dicat a me fuisse siue conscriptum siue falsatum. iam inter illos eligat quisque, cui credat. meum non est de hac re diutius disputare. rogamus, ut certe transmittas t sibi, si negauerit se ista sentire, quae illi obiciuntur inimica gratiae Christi. tam quippe aperta est eius defensio, ut, si uestram sanctam prudentiam, qui eius alia scripta non nostis, nulla uerborum ambiguitate fefellerit, magno gaudio gratulabimur non multum curantes, utrum illa peruersa et impia numquam senserit an se ab eis aliquando correxerit.

### English translation (Claude)

But if he denies that this book, or this passage in that book, is his, I have suitable witnesses, honorable and faithful men and without doubt his admirers, by whose testimony I can clear myself: that they themselves gave me the book, that this is read in it, and that they said it was Pelagius's; so that at least this may suffice me, lest he say it was either written or falsified by me. Then let each person choose which of them to believe. It is not my business to argue this matter further. We ask that you at least send it to him, in case he denies that he holds these views, hostile to the grace of Christ, which are charged against him. For his defense is so plain that, if he has not deceived your holy prudence (you who do not know his other writings) by any ambiguity of words, we shall rejoice with great joy, not much caring whether he never held those perverse and impious views or at some time corrected himself of them.

### Translation notes

- “send it to him”: the digital text is garbled here (“transmittas t sibi”); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 179.10 (CSEL 44:697; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-179-10).

## Letter 180.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-1
- Source: CSEL 44:697–698
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Oceanus, apologizing for a delayed reply to his letters.

### Latin text

Duas accepi simul epistulas dilectionis tuae, quarum in una facis tertiae mentionem et eam te prius misisse commemoras. quam accepisse non recolo, immo bene mihi recolere uideor, quod non acceperim. de his tamen, quas accepi, ago uberes gratias benignitati erga nos tuae. quibus ut non continuo responderem, in alia atque alia diuersarum occupationum tempestate direptus sum. unde nunc stillam uacantis temporis nactus respondere aliquid malui, quam ad tuam sincerissimam caritatem diuturnum habere silentium et fieri taciturnitate quam loquacitate importunior.

### English translation (Claude)

I received two letters from your love at the same time, in one of which you mention a third and say that you sent it earlier. I do not remember receiving it; rather, I think I remember well that I did not receive it. For those I did receive, however, I give abundant thanks to your kindness toward us. I was prevented from answering them at once, being swept away in one storm of various occupations after another. So now, having found a drop of free time, I have preferred to reply something rather than keep a long silence toward your most sincere love and become more troublesome by silence than by talkativeness.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Oceanus, a learned layman and friend of Jerome.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 180.1 (CSEL 44:697–698; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-1).

## Letter 180.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-2
- Source: CSEL 44:698
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The real difficulty with the creation of each new soul is not adulterous conception but the condemnation of unbaptized infants.

### Latin text

De origine animarum quid sanctus Hieronymus sentiat, iam sciebam et haec ipsa, quae ex libro eius in epistula tua posuisti, uerba iam legeram. uerum non hoc quaestionem molestam facit, quod mouet quosdam, quo modo deus adulterinis etiam conceptibus iuste animas largiatur, cum bene uiuentibus et ad deum fide ac pietate conuersis ne propria quidem quanto minus parentum possint obesse peccata. sed merito quaeritur, si uerum est nouas ex nihilo animas singulas singulis nascentibus fieri, quo modo tam innumerabiles animae paruulorum, quas deo certum est ante rationales annos, antequam quicquam iustum iniustumue sapere uel capere possint, sine baptismo de corporibus exituras, iuste in damnationem dentur ab illo utique, apud quem non est iniquitas. non opus est de hac re plura dicere, cum scias, quid uelim uel potius quid nolim dicere. satis existimo sapienti esse, quod dixi. uerum tamen, si aliquid hinc, quo ista quaestio solui queat, uel legisti uel ex ore eius audisti uel tibi ipsi dominus cogitanti donauit, ut noueris, impertire, obsecro, mihi, ut gratias uberiores agam.

### English translation (Claude)

I already knew what holy Jerome thinks about the origin of souls, and I had already read the very words from his book that you put in your letter. But what makes the question troublesome is not what moves some people, how God can justly bestow souls even on children conceived in adultery, since for those who live well and have turned to God in faith and piety not even their own sins, much less their parents', can do harm. Rather, it is rightly asked, if it is true that new souls are made from nothing one for each person born, how so innumerable a number of infants' souls, which God knows for certain will depart from their bodies without baptism before the years of reason, before they can know or grasp anything just or unjust, are justly given over to condemnation by him, with whom certainly there is no injustice. There is no need to say more about this, since you know what I wish, or rather what I do not wish, to say. I think what I have said is enough for a wise man. But if you have read something by which this question can be resolved, or heard it from his own mouth, or if the Lord has granted you to know it as you reflected on it, please share it with me, that I may give more abundant thanks.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 9:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 180.2 (CSEL 44:698; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-2).

## Letter 180.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-3
- Source: CSEL 44:698–699
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Figurative speech, such as Christ's saying that the Son does not know the day, is not lying, as Hilary showed.

### Latin text

Illud uero de officioso utilique mendacio, quod exemplo domini de die et hora huius saeculi finiendi nec filium scire dicentis putasti esse soluendum, conatu quidem ingenii tui, cum legerem, delectabar, sed nullo modo mihi uidetur tropicam locutionem recte dici posse mendacium. non enim mendacium est, cum diem laetum dicimus, quod laetos faciat, aut tristem lupinum, quod gustantis uultum amaro sapore contristet, sicut deum cognoscere, cum cognoscentem hominem facit; hoc enim dictum ad Abraham ipse commemorasti. nequaquam sunt ista mendacia, quod etiam ipse facillime aduertis. proinde beatus Hilarius cum obscuram quaestionem hoc genere tropicae locutionis aperuit, ut intellegeremus in eo se minus dixisse nescientem, in quo alios facit occultando nescientes, non excusauit mendacium, sed mendacium non esse monstrauit non solum in his usitatioribus tropis uerum in illa etiam quae appellatur metaphora, quae loquendi consuetudine omnibus nota est. nam gemmare uites, fluctuare segetes, florere iuuenes contendet quispiam esse mendacium, quod in his rebus nec undas nec lapides nec herbas uel arbores uidet, ubi proprie ista uerba dicuntur?

### English translation (Claude)

As for the question of the dutiful and useful lie, which you thought could be resolved by the example of the Lord's saying that not even the Son knows the day and hour of the end of this age, I was delighted, as I read it, by the effort of your ingenuity; but in no way does it seem to me that figurative speech can rightly be called a lie. For it is not a lie when we call a day joyful because it makes people joyful, or a lupine sad because it saddens the face of the one who tastes it with its bitter flavor; just as God is said to know when he makes a man know, for you yourself cited this saying to Abraham. These are by no means lies, as you yourself very easily see. Accordingly, when blessed Hilary opened up the obscure question by this kind of figurative speech, so that we should understand that the Lord said he did not know in the sense that he makes others not know by concealing it, he did not excuse a lie, but showed that it was not a lie, not only in these more usual figures but also in what is called metaphor, which is known to all from ordinary usage. For will anyone maintain that it is a lie to say that vines bud like gems, that cornfields ripple like waves, that the young flower, because in these things he sees neither waves nor gems nor grasses or trees, to which these words properly apply?

### Scripture references

- Mark 13:32: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 22:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Mark 13:32; Gen 22:12. Hilary's explanation is in On the Trinity 9 (not in the site's list of texts).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 180.3 (CSEL 44:698–699; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-3).

## Letter 180.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-4
- Source: CSEL 44:699–700
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's rebuke of Peter in Gal 2:14 is plain speech, not figure, and must be true.

### Latin text

Porro autem pro tuo ingenio atque eruditione facillime perspicis, quantum ab his differat, quod ait apostolus: Cum uiderem, quia non recte ingrediuntur ad ueritatem euangelii, dixi Petro coram omnibus: Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non Iudaice uiuis, quem ad modum gentes cogis iudaizare? nulla est hic tropica obscuritas, uerba sunt propria apertae locutionis. hoc profecto doctor gentium his, quos parturiebat, donec Christus formaretur in eis, et quibus sub diuina adtestatione praedixerat: Quae autem scribo uobis. ecce coram deo, quia non mentior, aut uerum dixit aut falsum; si falsum, quod absit, quae sequantur, aduertis t et ambo ista exhorrescens admonet ueritatis indicium et in apostolo Petro mirabilis humilitatis exemplum.

### English translation (Claude)

Moreover, with your talent and learning you see very easily how far from these is what the apostle says: “When I saw that they were not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel, I said to Peter before them all, ‘If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?’” Here there is no figurative obscurity; these are the literal words of plain speech. Surely the teacher of the Gentiles, writing to those with whom he was in labor until Christ was formed in them, and to whom he had declared, calling God to witness, “What I write to you, behold, before God, I do not lie,” said either what was true or what was false. If false, which God forbid, you see what follows; and both these considerations, as you shrink from them, warn you: the proof of truthfulness, and in the apostle Peter the example of wonderful humility.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:19: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The end of the section is garbled in the digital text (“aduertis t et ambo …”); translated by sense. This is part of the Augustine–Jerome dispute over Gal 2, translated as written. Quotations: Gal 2:14; Gal 4:19; Gal 1:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 180.4 (CSEL 44:699–700; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-4).

## Letter 180.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-5
- Source: CSEL 44:700–701
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome now agrees with Augustine and Cyprian on Gal 2; Augustine again asks for help on the soul's origin and for a book of Jerome on the resurrection.

### Latin text

Sed quid hinc diutius, quae de hac quaestione inter nos ego et praedictus uenerabilis frater Hieronymus satis litteris egerimus? et in hoc opere recentissimo, quod sub nomine Critobuli aduersus Pelagium modo edidit, eandem de ista re gesta dictisque apostolicis sententiam tenuit, quam beatissimi Cypriani etiam nos secuti sumus. illud potius de origine animarum non propter partus adulterinos sed propter innocentium, quod absit, damnationem, quod. opinor, non stulte quaeritur, si quid a tali ac tanto didicisti uiro, quod recte responderi ambigentibus possit, quaeso nobiscum communicare non abnuas. ita quippe mihi in epistulis tuis eruditus et suauis apparuisti, ut operae pretium sit tecum litteris conloqui. nescio sane quem librum eiusdem hominis dei, quem presbyter Orosius adtulit tuaeque dilectioni describendum dedit, ubi de resurrectione carnis praeclare disputasse laudatur, iam nobis peto non differas mittere. ideo quippe non eum cito poposcimus, quia et describendum et emendandum utique cogitauimus, cui utrique operi largissimum iam putamus tempus indultum. memor nostri deo uiuas.

### English translation (Claude)

But why say more on this point, which I and the venerable brother Jerome whom I mentioned have discussed sufficiently between us in letters? And in his most recent work, which he has just published against Pelagius under the name of Critobulus, he held the same opinion on this event and the apostle's words as we too have followed, that of the most blessed Cyprian. Rather, on the origin of souls, not because of adulterous births but because of the condemnation (God forbid!) of the innocent, which I think is not a foolish question: if you have learned anything from so great a man that can rightly be answered to those in doubt, please do not refuse to share it with us. For in your letters you have appeared to me so learned and pleasant that it is worthwhile to converse with you by letter. I ask you not to delay further in sending us a certain book of the same man of God, which the presbyter Orosius brought and gave your love to copy, in which he is praised for having discussed the resurrection of the flesh brilliantly. The reason we did not ask for it sooner is that we expected you would both copy it and correct it, and for both tasks we think ample time has now been allowed. Live to God, mindful of us.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:11–14: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Ep. 71.3 (Letters): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The work under the name of Critobulus is Jerome's Dialogue against the Pelagians (not in the site's list). Cyprian's view of Peter's correction is in Ep. 71.3 (Hartel numbering); the identification of Jerome's book on the resurrection is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 180.5 (CSEL 44:700–701; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-180-5).

## Letter 181.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-1
- Source: CSEL 44:701–703
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pope Innocent I praises the Council of Carthage for referring the Pelagian case to the apostolic see, according to ancient custom.

### Latin text

In requirendis diuinis rebus, quas omni cum sollicitudine decet a sacerdotibus, maxime a uero iustoque et catholico tractari concilio, antiquae traditionis exempla seruantes et ecclesiasticae memores disciplinae nostrae religionis uigorem non minus nunc in consulendo quam antea, cum pronuntiaretis, uera ratione firmatis, qui ad nostrum referendum adprobastis esse iudicium scientes, quid apostolicae sedi, cum omnes hoc loco positi ipsum sequi desideremus apostolum, debeatur, quo ipse episcopatus et tota auctoritas nominis huius emersit. quem sequentes tam mala iam damnare nouimus quam probare laudanda, uelut id uero, quod patrum instituta sacerdotali custodientes officio non censetis esse calcanda, quod illi non humana sed diuina decreuere sententia, ut quicquid quamuis de disiunctis remotisque prouinciis ageretur, non prius ducerent finiendum, nisi ad huius sedis notitiam perueniret, ut tota huius auctoritate, iusta quae fuerit pronuntiatio, firmaretur indeque sumerent ceterae ecclesiae, uelut de natali suo fonte aquae cunctae procederent et per diuersas totius mundi regiones puri capitis incorruptae manarent, quid praecipere, quos abluere, quos uelut in caeno inemundabili sordidatos mundis digna corporibus unda uitaret.

### English translation (Claude)

In examining divine matters, which priests ought to handle with all care, and above all a true, just, and Catholic council, you have kept the examples of ancient tradition and, mindful of church discipline, you have strengthened the vigor of our religion with true reason, no less now in consulting than before, when you pronounced judgment. For you have shown your approval that the matter should be referred to our judgment, knowing what is owed to the apostolic see, since all of us placed in this position desire to follow the apostle himself, from whom the episcopate itself and the whole authority of this name arose. Following him, we know how to condemn what is evil as well as to approve what is praiseworthy; as, for example, in this, that, guarding the institutions of the fathers by your priestly office, you judge that they must not be trampled underfoot. For they decreed, by a sentence not human but divine, that whatever was being dealt with, even in separate and remote provinces, they would not consider finished until it came to the knowledge of this see, so that whatever just pronouncement had been made might be confirmed by its whole authority; and that from there the other churches might take, as all waters proceed from their native spring and flow uncorrupted through the various regions of the whole world from a pure source, what they should prescribe, whom they should wash, and whom, as soiled with uncleansable mud, the water worthy of clean bodies should avoid.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Pope Innocent I to the Council of Carthage (dated 27 January 417, like Ep. 182), preserved among Augustine's letters. Innocent's statements on the authority of the Roman see are translated as written; the Latin is convoluted and some clauses are rendered by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.1 (CSEL 44:701–703; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-1).

## Letter 181.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-2
- Source: CSEL 44:703–704
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent welcomes the council's request for a decree binding all churches against the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Gratulor igitur, fratres carissimi, quod per fratrem et coepiscopum nostrum Iulium litteras ad nos destinastis et cum illis curam geritis, quibus praesidetis, ecclesiis, sollicitudinem uestram pro omnium utilitate monstratis et per cunctas totius orbis ecclesias omnibus una, quod prosit, decernendum esse deposcitis, ut suis constabilita regulis ecclesia et hoc, quod illos caueat, pronuntiationis iustae firmata decretalibus patere non possit, qui peruersis instructi, immo destructi uerborum argutiis sub imagine catholicae fidei disputantes uelut pestiferum exhalantes uirus, ut hominum recte sentientium in deteriorem partem corda corrumpant, totam ueri dogmatis quaerunt euertere disciplinam.

### English translation (Claude)

I congratulate you, then, dearest brothers, that you have sent us a letter by our brother and fellow bishop Julius, and that, while caring for the churches over which you preside, you show your concern for the benefit of all, and ask that what is beneficial be decreed for all alike throughout all the churches of the whole world; so that the church, established by its rules and strengthened by the decrees of a just pronouncement that guards against those men, may not lie open to them. For they, equipped, or rather wrecked, by perverse subtleties of words, arguing under the guise of the Catholic faith and breathing out, as it were, a pestilent poison, seek to corrupt the hearts of those who think rightly, turning them to the worse, and to overthrow the whole discipline of true doctrine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.2 (CSEL 44:703–704; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-2).

## Letter 181.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-3
- Source: CSEL 44:704–705
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Like a physician who amputates a festering limb, the church must cut off the error quickly.

### Latin text

Sanandum ergo celerius, ne longius execrandus animis morbus inserpat, ut si medicus, cum uiderit huius terreni corporis aliquem esse languorem. magnum suae artis aestimat documentum, si cito quis illius interuentu desperatus euadat. uel, cum putre uulnus aspexerit. adhibet fomenta uel cetera. quibus illud possit, quod natum fuerat, uulnus obduci, ac, si id manens sanari non poterit, ne corpus reliquum sua tabe corrumpat, ferro amputet, quod nocebat, quo reliquum integrum et seruet intactum. praecidendum id ergo est, quod uelut puro sanoque nimium corpori uulnus obrepsit, ne, cum tardius abstergitur, in ipsis paene uisceribus huius mali non exhaurienda post sentina considat.

### English translation (Claude)

So it must be healed quickly, lest the accursed disease creep further into souls; as a physician, when he sees some sickness of this earthly body, thinks it a great proof of his art if a patient given up for lost quickly escapes through his intervention; or, when he sees a festering wound, applies poultices or other remedies by which the wound that has formed can be closed over, and, if it cannot be healed while it remains, cuts off with the knife what was harmful, so that it may not corrupt the rest of the body with its decay, and keeps the rest whole and untouched. What has crept as a wound into a body otherwise very pure and healthy must therefore be cut away, lest, if it is cleaned out too late, the sewage of this evil settle almost in the very entrails, impossible afterwards to drain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.3 (CSEL 44:704–705; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-3).

## Letter 181.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-4
- Source: CSEL 44:705–707
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: It is unjust and irreligious to owe one's existence to God yet deny owing him daily grace.

### Latin text

Num quid nos de his post haec rectum mentibus aestimemus, qui sibi se putant debere, quod boni sunt, nec illum considerant, cuius cotidie gratiam consequuntur? sed iam isti, qui tales sunt, nullam dei gratiam consequuntur, qui sine illo tantum se adsequi posse confidunt, quantum uix illi, qui ab illo postulant et accipiunt, promerentur. quid enim tam iniquum potest esse, tam barbarum, tam totius religionis ignarum, tam Christianis mentibus inimicum, quam huic te negare debere, quicquid in cotidiana gratia consequeris, cui te ipse confiteris debere, quod natus es — ergo eris tibi in prouidendo praestantior, quam potest in te esse, qui te, ut esses, effecit! — et, cum putes debere, quod uiuis, quo modo te non putas illi debere, cum cotidianam eius consequendo gratiam taliter uiuis? et qui nos adiutorio negas indigere diuino, quasi ex nostra in totum possibilitate perfecti quo modo non adiutorium in nos, cum tales a nobis etiam esse possumus, prouocamus?

### English translation (Claude)

After this, are we to think there is anything right in the minds of those who think they owe it to themselves that they are good, and do not consider him whose grace they obtain every day? But in fact those who are like this obtain no grace of God, since they trust that without him they can attain as much as those who ask him and receive from him scarcely merit. For what can be so unjust, so barbarous, so ignorant of all religion, so hostile to Christian minds, as to deny that you owe whatever you obtain in daily grace to him to whom you confess you owe your birth? So you will be more excellent in providing for yourself than he who made you to exist can be in you! And when you think you owe him your life, how do you not think you owe it to him that you live as you do by obtaining his daily grace? And you who deny that we need divine help, as though we were perfect entirely by our own capacity, how is it that, when we can be such of ourselves, we do not provoke his help against us?

### Translation notes

- The last sentence is obscure in the Latin (“quo modo non adiutorium in nos … prouocamus”); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.4 (CSEL 44:705–707; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-4).

## Letter 181.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-5
- Source: CSEL 44:707–708
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We need God's help daily, whether living well or badly; free choice alone cannot overcome sin.

### Latin text

Qui enim adiutorium dei negat, uellem interrogare, quid dicat: nos non mereri? an illum hoc non posse praestare? an nihil esse, propter quod unusquisque hoc debeat postulare? posse hoc deum opera ipsa testantur. adiutorio cotidiano nos egere negare non possumus; hoc enim, seu bene uiuimus, prouocamus, ut melius sanctiusque uiuamus, seu praua sentientes a bonis auertimur, ut ad rectam redeamus uiam, eius auxilio plus egemus. num quid tam mortiferum, tam praeceps uideatur ad casum, tam expositum ad omnia pericula, si hoc solum nobis putantes posse sufficere, quod liberum arbitrium, cum nasceremur, accepimus, ultra iam a domino nihil quaeramus, id est auctoris nostri obliti eius potentiam, ut nos ostendamus liberos, abiuremus, quasi iam amplius, quod possit dare, non habeat; qui te in tuo ortu liberum fecit, nescientes, quod, nisi magnis precibus gratia in nos inplorata descendat. nequaquam terrenae labis et mundani corporis uincere conemur errores, cum pares nos ad resistendum non liberum arbitrium sed dei solum facere possit auxilium?

### English translation (Claude)

I would like to ask the one who denies God's help what he means: that we do not deserve it? Or that God cannot give it? Or that there is nothing for which each person ought to ask it? That God can do it, his works themselves bear witness. That we need daily help we cannot deny; for if we live well, we call on it so that we may live better and more holily; and if, thinking perversely, we are turned away from good, we need his aid all the more to return to the right way. Would anything seem so deadly, so headlong toward a fall, so exposed to every danger, as if, thinking that only what we received at birth, free choice, can suffice us, we should seek nothing further from the Lord; that is, forgetful of our Author, we should renounce his power so as to show ourselves free, as though he had nothing more to give, he who made you free at your birth; not knowing that, unless grace implored with great prayers comes down upon us, we could in no way attempt to overcome the errors of earthly stain and of the worldly body, since it is not free choice but God's help alone that can make us equal to resisting?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.5 (CSEL 44:707–708; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-5).

## Letter 181.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-6
- Source: CSEL 44:708–709
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: David's constant prayer for God's help refutes the Pelagian claim that we do not need it.

### Latin text

Nam si ille clamat adiutorio sibi opus esse diuino, qui digne hoc non quaereret, si cui liberum arbitrium plus prodesset — quippe cum uir beatus et iam electus a domino nil egeret, tamen ita deum deprecatur postulans: Adiutor meus esto; ne derelinquas me neque despicias me. deus salutaris meus —, nos nobis liberum arbitrium, ille deum postulat adiutorem? quod nati sumus, posse sufficere nos dicimus, ille deum, ne derelinquatur, exorat? non, rogo. manifeste discimus, quid oremus, cum ille tantopere beatus. ut supra diximus, uir, ne despiciatur, exoptat? illi enim necesse est ista arguant, qui illa confirmant. Dauid enim orationis ignarus et suae naturae nescius accusetur, qui cum sciat tantum in sua esse natura, adiutorem sibi deum et assiduum adiutorem — nec illi sufficit assiduum, sed, ne aliquando illum despiciat, orationibus pronus exoptat et per corpus omne psalterii hoc et praedicat et clamat. si ergo hoc ille ita magnum scitu ut assidue diceret, ita necessarium confessus est ut doceret, quem ad modum Pelagius Caelestiusque seposita omni responsione psalmorum talique abdicata doctrina suasuros se aliquibus esse confidunt nos adiutorium dei nec debere quaerere nec egere, cum omnes sancti nihil se sine hoc agere posse testantur?

### English translation (Claude)

For if he cries out that he needs divine help, who would not seek it fittingly if free choice benefited anyone more (since a blessed man, already chosen by the Lord, needed nothing, yet so entreats God, asking, “Be my helper; do not forsake me or despise me, O God my salvation”), do we ask free choice for ourselves, while he asks God as his helper? Do we say that our being born can suffice us, while he begs God not to be forsaken? Do we not, I ask, learn plainly what we should pray for, when so blessed a man, as we said above, prays not to be despised? Those who affirm such things must necessarily find fault with these words. Let David then be accused of being ignorant of prayer and unaware of his own nature, who, though he knew how much lay in his nature, prays, bowed down in prayers, that God may be his helper, a constant helper (nor is constant enough for him, but he prays that God may never despise him), and proclaims and cries this throughout the whole body of the Psalter. If, then, he confessed this to be so great a thing to know that he said it constantly, and so necessary that he taught it, how do Pelagius and Caelestius, setting aside every answer of the Psalms and rejecting such teaching, trust that they will persuade some that we neither ought to seek God's help nor need it, when all the saints testify that they can do nothing without it?

### Scripture references

- Ps 27:9 (26:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 27:9 (26:9 LXX/Vulgate). The Latin of the opening sentence is tangled; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.6 (CSEL 44:708–709; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-6).

## Letter 181.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-7
- Source: CSEL 44:709–711
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Adam fell by misusing freedom; Christ restores through baptism and continues to supply daily grace.

### Latin text

Liberum enim arbitrium olim ille perpessus dum suis inconsultius utitur bonis, cadens in praeuaricationis profunda demersus nihil, quem ad modum exinde surgere posset. inuenit suaque in aeternum libertate deceptus huius ruinae latuisset oppressu, nisi eum post Christi pro sua gratia releuasset aduentus, qui per nouae regenerationis purificationem omne praeteritum uitium sui baptismatis lauacro purgauit et eius firmans statum, quo rectius constabiliusque procederet. tamen suam gratiam in posterum non negauit nam quamuis hominem redemisset a praeteritis ille peccatis, tamen sciens iterum posse peccare ad reparationem sibi, quem ad modum posset illum et post ista corrigere, multa seruauit. cotidiana praestat ille remedia, quibus nisi freti confisique nitamur, nullatenus humanos uincere poterimus errores. necesse est enim, ut, quo auxiliante uincimus, eo iterum non adiuuante uincamur. sed possem plura dicere, nisi uos constaret cuncta dixisse.

### English translation (Claude)

For that man of old, having experienced free choice while he used his good gifts too heedlessly, fell and was plunged into the depths of transgression, and found no way to rise from there; and, deceived forever by his freedom, he would have lain hidden under the weight of this ruin, had not the coming of Christ afterwards raised him up by his grace. Christ, through the purification of a new regeneration, cleansed all past fault by the washing of his baptism; and, strengthening his state so that he might advance more rightly and steadily, he did not deny his grace for the future. For although he had redeemed man from past sins, knowing that he could sin again, he kept many things in reserve for his restoration, by which he could correct him even after this. He provides daily remedies, and unless we strive relying and trusting on them, we shall in no way be able to overcome human errors. For it must be that, without the help of him by whose help we conquer, we are conquered again. But I could say more, were it not plain that you have said everything.

### Scripture references

- Titus 3:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Titus 3:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.7 (CSEL 44:709–711; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-7).

## Letter 181.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-8
- Source: CSEL 44:711–712
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who deny the need for divine help are enemies of the faith and unworthy of communion, and must be removed from the church.

### Latin text

Quisquis ergo huic adsentiens uidetur esse sententiae, quo dicat adiutorio nobis non opus esse diuino, inimicum se a catholicae fidei et dei beneficiis profitetur ingratum. nec nostra communione sunt digni, quam praedicando taliter polluerunt. sic enim sua sponte, dum sequuntur illa, quae dicunt, longius a uera religione fugerunt. cum enim hoc totum in nostra professione consistat cotidianisque precibus nihil agamus, nisi quem ad modum dei misericordiam consequamur, quem ad modum ferre possumus ista iactantes? quis, rogo, tantus illorum pectora error obcaecat, ut, si ipsi nullam dei gratiam sentiunt, quia nec digni sunt nec merentur, nec de aliis considerent, quid cotidie singulis gratia diuina largitur? sunt quidem isti omnes caecitate dignissimi, qui nec hoc sibi reliquerunt, ut se auxilio credant reuocari ab erroribus posse diuino. negantes enim adiutorium non aliis sed sibi hoc penitus abstulerunt. qui auellendi sunt longius et ab ecclesiae procul remouendi uisceribus, ne diutius multa occupans insanabilis post error increscat. si enim diu fuerint sub hac impunitate uersati, necesse est multos in hanc suae prauitatem mentis inducant decipiantque innocentes uel potius inprudentes, qui fidem catholicam nunc sequuntur; putabunt enim eos recte sentire, quos adhuc uident in ecclesia perdurare.

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever, then, appears to agree with this opinion, so as to say that we have no need of divine help, declares himself an enemy of the Catholic faith and ungrateful for God's benefits. Nor are they worthy of our communion, which they have polluted by such preaching. For in following what they say, they have of their own accord fled further from the true religion. For since our whole profession consists in this, and in our daily prayers we do nothing but seek how we may obtain God's mercy, how can we tolerate men who boast such things? What great error, I ask, blinds their hearts, so that, if they themselves feel no grace of God, because they are neither worthy nor deserving, they do not consider in others what divine grace bestows on each every day? All these are most deserving of blindness, who have not left themselves even this, to believe that they can be called back from their errors by divine help. For in denying help they have taken it away completely, not from others, but from themselves. They must be torn away and removed far from the heart of the church, lest the incurable error, seizing on many, grow further. For if they remain long in this impunity, they will inevitably lead many into the depravity of their mind and deceive the innocent, or rather the unwary, who now follow the Catholic faith; for these will think those men hold right views whom they see still remaining in the church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.8 (CSEL 44:711–712; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-8).

## Letter 181.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-9
- Source: CSEL 44:712–715
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent excommunicates the Pelagians but allows the bishops to receive them back if they repent and condemn their views.

### Latin text

Separetur ergo a sano corpore uulnus insanum remotoque morbi saeuientis afflatu cautius, quae sunt sincera, perdurent et grex purior ab hac mali pecoris contagione purgetur. sit totius corporis inlibata perfectio, quam uos sequi et tenere hac in illos pronuntiatione cognouimus et una uobiscum pari assensione seruamus. qui si tamen aliquod in se dei adiutorium, quod hucusque negauerunt, prouocauerint et opus sibi eius auxilium esse cognouerint, ut de hac labe, in qua sui cordis incuruatione corruerant, liberentur et quasi in lucem de foeda tracti caligine remotis abdicatisque omnibus, quibus totus, ne uerum aspiceret, foedabatur et caligabat aspectus, damnent haec, quae hucusque senserunt, et aliquando animum rectis disputationibus commodantes ab hac aliquantulum labe correcti ueris se sanandos consiliis tribuant atque submittant, — quod si fecerint, erit in potestate pontificum istis aliquatenus subuenire et talibus aliquam curam praestare uulneribus, quam solet lapsis, cum resipuerint, ecclesia non negare, ut a suis reuocati praecipitiis intra ouile domini redigantur, ne foris positi et tanto praesidio a fide munitionis exclusi periculis omnibus exponantur deuorandi luporum dentibus atque uexandi, quibus obsistere hac, qua illos in se inritauerant, doctrinae peruersitate non possunt. sed satis uestris monitis et sic satis abundantibus nostrae legis exemplis probatur esse responsum nec quicquam superesse duximus, quod dicamus, cum nihil praetermissum a uobis, nihil constet esse suppressum, quo illi refutati et penitus agnoscantur esse conuicti. ideoque a nobis testimonia nulla ponuntur, quia et his plena relatio est et satis constat tot doctissimos sacerdotes cuncta dixisse nec decet credere uos aliquid, quod ad causam possit proficere. praeterisse. [Et alia manu:] Bene ualete, fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

Let the diseased wound, then, be separated from the healthy body, and with the breath of the raging disease removed, let what is sound endure more safely, and let the flock be purified of the contagion of this diseased beast. Let the whole body remain unimpaired in its perfection, which we know you follow and hold by this pronouncement against them, and which we keep together with you in equal agreement. But if they call down upon themselves some help of God, which until now they have denied, and recognize that they need his aid to be freed from this stain into which they had fallen by the crookedness of their heart; and if, drawn as it were into the light from foul darkness, with everything removed and renounced by which their whole sight was befouled and darkened so that it could not see the truth, they condemn what they have held until now, and at last, applying their minds to right discussion, somewhat corrected from this stain, give and submit themselves to true counsels to be healed: if they do this, it will be in the power of the bishops to help them in some measure and to give such wounds the kind of care which the church is not accustomed to deny the lapsed when they come to their senses; so that, called back from their precipices, they may be brought back within the Lord's fold, lest, left outside and shut out from so great a protection of the faith's defenses, they be exposed to every danger, to be devoured and torn by the teeth of wolves, which they cannot resist with the perverse doctrine by which they provoked them against themselves. But your admonitions, and the abundant examples of our law, have answered sufficiently, and we think nothing remains for us to say, since it is plain that nothing has been omitted or suppressed by you by which they may be refuted and recognized as thoroughly convicted. And so we set down no testimonies, because your report is full of them, and it is evident that so many most learned priests have said everything, and it is not fitting to believe that you have passed over anything that could help the case. [And in another hand:] Farewell, brothers.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 181.9 (CSEL 44:712–715; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/179-1/#p-181-9).

## Letter 182.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-1
- Source: CSEL 44:715–716
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pope Innocent I replies to the Council of Milevis, praising its pastoral concern both to exclude the erring and to receive the repentant.

### Latin text

Inter ceteras ecclesiae Romanae curas et apostolicae sedis occupationes, quibus diuersorum consulta fideli ac medica disceptatione tractamus. frater et coepiscopus noster Iulius dilectionis uestrae litteras, quas ex Mileuitano concilio cura fidei propensiore misistis, mihi inopinanter ingessit Carthaginensis etiam synodi querelae parilis scripta subiungens. nimirum exultat ecclesia tantam sollicitudinem commissis gregibus exhibere pastores, ut non solum neminem ex his patiantur errare. sed, si quas. magis ouium scaeuae delectationis herba seduxit ac si in errore permanserint. aut segregari penitus uelint aut inlicenter dudum petita uitantes custodiae pristinae circumspectione tutari in utraque parte uidelicet consulentes, ne uel suscipiendo tales simili ceterae ducantur exemplo uel spernendo redeuntes luporum morsibus uideantur ingestae. prudens admodum et catholicae fidei plena consultatio. qui enim aut tolerare possit errantem aut non recipere corrigentem? nam ut durum arbitror coniuentiam praebere peccantibus, ita impium iudico manum negare conuersis.

### English translation (Claude)

Among the other cares of the Roman church and the occupations of the apostolic see, in which we deal with the consultations of various people by faithful and healing discussion, our brother and fellow bishop Julius unexpectedly brought me the letter of your love, which you sent from the Council of Milevis out of an especially earnest concern for the faith, adding the writings of the synod of Carthage with a similar complaint. Truly the church rejoices that shepherds show such care for the flocks entrusted to them, so that they not only allow none of them to stray, but, if any sheep have been led astray by the grass of a perverse delight, and if they remain in error, they wish either to separate them entirely or, if they shun what they long since sought without license, to protect them with the watchfulness of their former keeping: taking thought on both sides, that by receiving such people the rest may not be led on by a similar example, nor, by spurning those who return, may they seem to be thrown to the bites of wolves. A very prudent consultation, and full of the Catholic faith. For who could either tolerate one who errs or not receive one who corrects himself? For as I think it harsh to connive at those who sin, so I judge it impious to refuse a hand to those who are converted.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Pope Innocent I to the Council of Milevis, 27 January 417. The Latin of the middle sentence is tangled; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.1 (CSEL 44:715–716; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-1).

## Letter 182.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-2
- Source: CSEL 44:716–717
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent affirms that questions of faith are rightly referred to the see of Peter, from which answers flow to all provinces.

### Latin text

Diligenter ergo et congrue apostolici consulitis honoris. arcani honoris, inquam, illius, quem praeter illa, quae sunt extrinsecus, sollicitudo manet omnium ecclesiarum, super anxiis rebus quae sit tenenda sententia, antiquae scilicet regulae formam secuti, quam toto semper ab orbe mecum nostis esse seruatam. uerum haec missa facio; neque enim hoc uestram credo latere prudentiam. quid id etiam actione firmastis nisi scientes, quod per omnes prouincias de apostolico fonte petentibus responsa semper emanent? praesertim quotiens fidei ratio uentilatur, arbitror omnes fratres et coepiscopos nostros nonnisi ad Petrum, id est sui nominis et honoris auctorem referre debere, uelut nunc rettulit uestra dilectio, quod per totum mundum possit ecclesiis omnibus in commune prodesse. fiant enim necesse est cautiores, cum inuentores malorum ad duplicis relationem synodi sententiae nostrae statutis uiderint ab ecclesiastica communione seiunctos.

### English translation (Claude)

Diligently and fittingly, then, do you consult the apostolic honor, that secret honor, I say, which, besides the things that are external, has the care of all the churches, about what opinion is to be held in anxious matters, following the pattern of the ancient rule which you know with me has always been kept throughout the whole world. But I leave this aside; for I do not think it is hidden from your prudence. Why did you also confirm this by your action, if not because you know that throughout all the provinces answers always flow from the apostolic spring to those who ask? Especially whenever a question of faith is being examined, I think that all our brothers and fellow bishops ought to refer only to Peter, that is, to the author of their name and honor, as your love has now referred, something that can benefit all the churches in common throughout the whole world. For the inventors of evils must become more cautious when they see that, on the report of a double synod, they have been cut off from church communion by the decrees of our sentence.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 2 Cor 11:28 (“the care of all the churches”). Innocent's claims for the Roman see are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.2 (CSEL 44:716–717; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-2).

## Letter 182.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-3
- Source: CSEL 44:717–719
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians, by denying God's help, abolish daily prayer; Adam's fall and David's prayers show our need of grace.

### Latin text

Gemino igitur bono caritas uestra fungetur. nam et canonum potiemini gratia seruatorum et beneficio uestro totus orbis utetur. quis enim catholicorum uirorum cum aduersariis Christi uelit ulterius miscere sermonem? quis saltem ipsam lucem uitae communione partiri? nouae haereseos nimirum fugiantur auctores. quid enim acerbius in dominum fingere potuerunt, quam cum adiutoria diuina cassarent causamque cotidianae precationis auferrent? hoc est dicere: Quo mihi opus deo? merito in hos dicat hymnidicus: Ecce homines, qui non posuerunt deum adiutorem sibi! negantes ergo auxilium dei inquiunt hominem sibi posse sufficere nec gratia hunc egere diuina, qua priuatus necesse est diaboli laqueis inretitus occumbat, dum ad omnia uitae perficienda mandata sola tantum modo libertate contendat. o prauissimarum mentium. peruersa doctrina! aduerte tandem, quod primum hominem ita libertas ipsa decepit, ut, dum indulgentius frenis eius utitur, in praeuaricationis praesumptione conciderit, nec ex hac potuit erui, nisi ei prouidentia regenerationis statum pristinae libertatis Christi domini reformasset aduentus. audiat Dauid dicentem: Adiutorium nostrum in nomine domini et: Adiutor meus esto; ne derelinquas me neque despicias me, deus salutaris meus, quae incassum dixerit, si tantum in eius erat positum uoluntate, quod a domino flebili sermone poscebat.

### English translation (Claude)

Your love will thus perform a double good. For you will have the grace of having kept the canons, and the whole world will enjoy your benefit. For what Catholic man would wish to converse any further with the adversaries of Christ? Who would share even the light of life with them in fellowship? The authors of the new heresy must surely be shunned. For what more bitter thing could they have devised against the Lord than to make divine help void and take away the reason for daily prayer? This is to say, “What need have I of God?” Rightly may the psalmist say against them, “Behold the men who did not make God their helper!” Denying, then, the help of God, they say that man can suffice himself and does not need divine grace, deprived of which he must fall, entangled in the devil's snares, while he strives to fulfill all the commandments of life by freedom alone. O perverse teaching of most depraved minds! Notice at last that freedom itself so deceived the first man that, using its reins too indulgently, he fell into the presumption of transgression; nor could he be rescued from it, had not the coming of Christ the Lord, by the providence of regeneration, restored to him the state of his former freedom. Let them hear David saying, “Our help is in the name of the Lord,” and, “Be my helper; do not forsake me or despise me, O God my salvation”; which he would have said in vain if what he asked of the Lord with tearful words lay only in his own will.

### Scripture references

- Ps 52:7 (51:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 124:8 (123:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 27:9 (26:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 52:7 (51:9 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 124:8 (123:8); Ps 27:9 (26:9).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.3 (CSEL 44:717–719; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-3).

## Letter 182.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-4
- Source: CSEL 44:719–720
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture everywhere joins God's help to free will; the council's testimonies suffice to refute Pelagius and Caelestius.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, cum in omnibus diuinis paginis uoluntati liberae nonnisi adiutorium dei legamus esse nectendum eamque nihil posse caelestibus praesidiis destitutam, quonam modo huic soli possibilitatem hanc pertinaciter, ut adseritis, defendentes sibimet, immo, quod est dignius dolore communi, iam plurimis Pelagius Caelestiusque persuadent? multifariis equidem ad instruendum tale magisterium uti possemus exemplis. nisi sciremus sanctitatem uestram ad plenum scripturas omnes callere diuinas, praesertim cum uestra relatio tantis ae talibus testimoniis sit referta, ut his solis ualeat praesens dogma rescindi, opusque non esse reconditis, cum his, quae facile nobis occurrentia posuistis, nec audeant obuiare nec possint. ergo dei gratiam conantur auferre, quam necesse est etiam restituta nobis status pristini libertate quaeramus; quippe nec alias diaboli machinas nisi eadem possumus iuuante uitare.

### English translation (Claude)

Since this is so, since in all the divine pages we read that nothing but the help of God is to be joined to the free will, and that it can do nothing when deprived of heavenly aid, how is it that Pelagius and Caelestius, obstinately defending, as you assert, this capacity for the will alone, persuade themselves, and (what is more worthy of common grief) many others already? We could indeed use many examples to refute such teaching, did we not know that Your Holiness is fully versed in all the divine Scriptures, especially since your report is filled with so many and such testimonies that by these alone the present doctrine can be overthrown, and there is no need of more recondite ones, since they neither dare nor are able to oppose those you have set down, which readily occur to us. So they try to take away the grace of God, which we must seek even once the freedom of our former state has been restored to us; for we cannot avoid the devil's other devices except with its help.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.4 (CSEL 44:719–720; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-4).

## Letter 182.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-5
- Source: CSEL 44:720–721
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent rejects the claim that unbaptized infants can have eternal life, citing John 6:53 and Matt 19:14.

### Latin text

Illud uero, quod eos uestra fraternitas adserit praedicare, paruulos aeternae uitae praemiis etiam sine baptismatis gratia posse donari, perfatuum est. nisi enim manducauerint carnem filii hominis et biberint sanguinem eius, non habebunt uitam in semet ipsis. qui autem hanc eis sine regeneratione defendunt, uidentur mihi ipsum baptismum uelle cassare, cum praedicant hos habere, quod in eos credunt non sibi baptismate conferendum. si ergo nihil uolunt officere, non renasci fateantur necesse est nec regenerationis sacra fluenta prodesse. uerum ut superfluorum hominum praua doctrina celeri ueritatis possit ratione discingi, proclamat hoc dominus in euangelio dicens: Sinite infantes et nolite eos prohibere ad me.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what your brotherhood asserts that they preach, that little children can be granted the rewards of eternal life even without the grace of baptism, it is utterly foolish. For unless they eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, they will not have life in themselves. Those who maintain that they have this life without regeneration seem to me to wish to make baptism itself void, since they preach that infants have what they believe is not to be conferred on them by baptism. So if they wish it to do no harm, they must admit that they are not reborn and that the sacred streams of regeneration are of no benefit. But so that the perverse doctrine of worthless men may be quickly undone by the reasoning of truth, the Lord proclaims this in the Gospel, saying, “Let the little children come, and do not forbid them to come to me.”

### Scripture references

- John 6:53: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 6:53 (applied to infants, implying infant communion); Matt 19:14 (Latin wording). Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.5 (CSEL 44:720–721; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-5).

## Letter 182.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-6
- Source: CSEL 44:721–722
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent excommunicates Pelagius and Caelestius and all who obstinately defend their views.

### Latin text

Qua re Pelagium Caelestiumque, id est inuentores uocum nouarum, quae, sicut dixit apostolus, aedificationis nihilum sed magis uanissimas consuerunt parare quaestiones, ecclesiastica communione priuari apostolici uigoris auctoritate censemus, donec resipiscant de diaboli laqueis, a quo captiui tenentur secundum ipsius uoluntatem, eosque interim dominico ouili non recipi, quod ipsi peruersae uiae secuti tramitem deserere uoluerunt. abscidendi sunt enim, qui nos conturbant et uolunt conuertere euangelium Christi. simul autem praecipimus, ut, quicumque id pertinacia simili defensare nituntur. par eos uindicta constringat, non solum enim qui faciunt sed etiam qui consentiunt facientibus, quia non multum interesse arbitror inter committentis animum et consentientis fauorem; addo amplius: plerumque dediscit errare, cui nemo consentit. haec igitur, fratres carissimi, in supradicta maneant fixa sententia: absint atriis domini, careant dum taxat custodia pastorali, ne duarum ouium dira contagia serpant forsitan per uulgus incautum rapacique lupus corde laetetur intra ouile dominicum tantas ouium fusas cateruas, dum a custodibus dissimulanter habetur uulnus duarum. prospiciendum est ergo, ne permittendo lupos mercennarii magis quam uideamur esse pastores.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, by the authority of apostolic vigor, we decree that Pelagius and Caelestius, the inventors of new words, which, as the apostle said, produce nothing for edification but rather the emptiest questions, are deprived of church communion, until they come to their senses from the snares of the devil, by whom they are held captive to his will; and that meanwhile they are not received into the Lord's fold, which they themselves chose to desert by following the path of a perverse way. For those must be cut off who trouble us and wish to pervert the Gospel of Christ. At the same time we order that whoever strive to defend this with similar obstinacy be bound by the same punishment. For not only those who do these things, but also those who consent to those who do them; because I think there is not much difference between the mind of one who commits and the favor of one who consents. I add further: often one unlearns error when no one agrees with him. So, dearest brothers, let these men remain fixed under the sentence stated above: let them be absent from the Lord's courts; let them lack, for now, pastoral protection; lest the dire contagion of two sheep perhaps creep through the unwary crowd, and the wolf rejoice with greedy heart over so many flocks of sheep laid low within the Lord's fold, while the wound of two is overlooked by the keepers. We must take care, then, lest by allowing wolves we seem to be hirelings rather than shepherds.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:4: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:20: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Tim 2:26: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:12: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 1:32: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Tim 6:4 and 2 Tim 2:23 (empty questions); 1 Tim 6:20; 2 Tim 2:26; Gal 1:7; Gal 5:12; Rom 1:32; John 10:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.6 (CSEL 44:721–722; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-6).

## Letter 182.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-7
- Source: CSEL 44:722–724
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent allows Pelagius and Caelestius to be received back if they renounce their errors.

### Latin text

Iubemus sane, quoniam Christus dominus noster propria uoce signauit nolle se mortem morientis, tantum ut reuertatur et uiuat. ut, si umquam sanum deposito praui dogmatis errore resipuerint damnarintque ea, quorum se ipsi praeuaricatione damnarunt, eis medicinam solitam, id est receptaculum suum ab ecclesia non negari, ne, dum eos redeuntes forsitan prohibemus, uere extra ouile remanentes expectantis hostis rabidis faucibus gluttiantur, quos in semet ipsi in spiculis malae disputationis armarunt. bene ualete, fratres. Dat. VI. Kl. Febr. Honorio et Constantio uu. cc. conss.

### English translation (Claude)

We order, however, since Christ our Lord declared with his own voice that he does not desire the death of the dying, but only that he turn back and live, that, if they ever come to their senses and lay aside the error of their perverse doctrine and condemn the things by whose transgression they condemned themselves, the usual medicine, that is, its own refuge, shall not be denied them by the church; lest, if we perhaps forbid them when they return, they really remain outside the fold and be swallowed by the raging jaws of the waiting enemy, whom they themselves have armed against themselves with the darts of evil argument. Farewell, brothers. Given on the sixth day before the Kalends of February, in the consulship of Honorius and Constantius, most illustrious men.

### Scripture references

- Ezek 33:11: allusion, high confidence
- Ezek 18:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Ezek 18:32 and 33:11 (attributed to Christ's “own voice”). Date: 27 January 417.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 182.7 (CSEL 44:722–724; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-182-7).

## Letter 183.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-1
- Source: CSEL 44:724–725
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pope Innocent I writes to the five African bishops, welcoming their letter and reaffirming his judgment against the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Fraternitatis uestrae litteras plenas fidei totoque religionis catholicae uigore firmatas a duobus missas conciliis per fratrem et coepiscopum nostrum Iulium pergrato suscepimus animo, quod earum tenor omnisque contextio in consideratione cotidianae gratiae dei et in eorum correctione, qui contra sentiunt, integra ratione consistit, ut et illis omnem tollere possit errorem et idoneum dato quouis nostrae legis exemplo, quem sequi debeant, dignum possint praebere doctorem. sed de his iam satis, ut opinor, supra diximus, cum uestris relationibus respondentes rescripsimus. quid uel de illorum perfidia uel de uestra sententia sentiremus. sed subinde contra eos subuenit et suppeditat, quod dicatur, nec potest aliquando deesse, quod uincat, cum tam miserum impiumque sit, quod nostrae fidei uirtute et ipsa plenius ueritate uincatur. qui enim omnem uitae spem respuit atque contempsit inimica damnabilique cor suum disputatione confundens, cum credit nihil esse. quod a deo accipiat. nec aliquid superesse, quod petat ad sanandum se, — qui sibi hoc abstulit. ulterius quid reliquit?

### English translation (Claude)

We received with very grateful mind the letter of your brotherhood, full of faith and strengthened with all the vigor of the Catholic religion, sent from two councils through our brother and fellow bishop Julius; for its whole tenor and composition rests, by sound reasoning, on consideration of God's daily grace and on the correction of those who think otherwise, so that it can remove all error from them and, by giving any suitable example of our law, can provide them a worthy teacher to follow. But on these matters I think we have already said enough above, when, answering your reports, we wrote back what we thought both of their faithlessness and of your sentence. Yet something to say against them keeps coming up and offering itself, and what conquers can never be lacking, since what is conquered more fully by the strength of our faith and by the truth itself is so wretched and impious. For he who has rejected and despised all hope of life, confusing his heart with a hostile and damnable argument, since he believes that there is nothing he receives from God, and nothing left that he should ask for his healing: having taken this from himself, what has he left?

### Translation notes

- Letter of Pope Innocent I to Aurelius, Alypius, Augustine, Evodius, and Possidius (reply to Ep. 177), 27 January 417.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 183.1 (CSEL 44:724–725; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-1).

## Letter 183.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-2
- Source: CSEL 44:725–726
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent does not know of Pelagians in Rome but hopes that all followers will be corrected by Pelagius's condemnation.

### Latin text

Si ergo sunt aliqui, quos in sui defensionem peruersitas tanta deuinxit, qui huic se dogmati dedant atque coniungant sperantes hoc ad catholicam pertinere doctrinam, quod abhorrens longius et penitus adprobatur aduersum, infecti illorum et monitis et uerbis ut laberentur inducti, quatenus ad rectum uiae tramitem redeant, festinabunt, ne diutius mentem obsidens uelut eorum sensibus pastus error inuadat. nam si Pelagius. quocumque restitit loco, eorum animos, qui facile uel simpliciter crederent disputanti, hac adfirmatione decepit, seu hic illi in urbe sunt, quod nescientes nec manifestare possumus nec negare, cum, etsi sunt, lateant nec aliquando audeant uel illum praedicantem ista defendere uel talia aliquo nostrorum praesente iactare et in tanta populi multitudine nec deprehendi aliquis facile nec alicubi possit agnosci, siue in quouis terrarum loco degant, dei nostri misericordia gratiaque credimus quod facile corrigantur audita eius damnatione, qui fuerit pertinax et resistens huius dogmatis auctor inuentus, nec interest, ubi isti fuerint, dum, ubicumque inueniri potuerint, sint sanandi.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, there are some whom such great perversity has bound to its defense, who give themselves to this doctrine and join it, hoping that what is proven to be far removed from and wholly opposed to Catholic teaching belongs to it, infected by those men's admonitions and words and led on to fall, they will hasten to return to the right path, lest error, besieging the mind and as it were fed on their thoughts, take possession of them for longer. For if Pelagius, wherever he stayed, deceived by this assertion the minds of those who easily or simply believed him when he argued: whether such people are here in the city (which, not knowing it, we can neither declare nor deny, since, if they exist, they hide, and never dare either to defend him when he preaches these things or to throw out such things in the presence of any of our people, and in so great a multitude of people no one can easily be detected or recognized anywhere), or whether they live in any other part of the world, we believe that by the mercy and grace of our God they will easily be corrected when they hear of the condemnation of him who has been found the obstinate and resisting author of this doctrine; nor does it matter where they are, so long as, wherever they can be found, they are healed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 183.2 (CSEL 44:725–726; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-2).

## Letter 183.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-3
- Source: CSEL 44:726–727
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent doubts the authenticity and the force of the acts of Diospolis, which reached him without official letters.

### Latin text

Nobis tamen nec persuaderi potest eum esse purgatum, quamuis ad nos a nescio quibus laicis sint gesta perlata, quibus ille auditum se et crederet absolutum. quae utrum uera sint, dubitamus, quod sub nulla illius concilii prosecutione uenerunt nec eorum aliquas accepimus de hac re litteras, apud quos istius rei iste praestitit causas. quod si de sua ille potuisset purgatione confidere, hoc magis credimus, quod egisset, quod multo uerius esse potuerat, ut illos cogeret epistulis suis, quid iudicauerant, indicare. uerum cum sint aliqua in ipsis posita gestis, quae obiecta partim ille uitando suppressit partim multa in se uerba retorquendo tota obscuritate confudit, aliqua magis falsis argumentis quam uera ratione, ut ad tempus poterat uideri, purgauit negando alia, alia falsa interpretatione uertendo.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet we cannot be persuaded that he has been cleared, although proceedings have been brought to us by some laymen or other, by which he believed he had been heard and acquitted. Whether these are genuine we doubt, because they did not come with any dispatch from that council, nor have we received any letter about this from those before whom he pleaded his case. If he had been able to be confident of his clearing, we rather believe he would have done what would have been much more proper: compelled them to indicate by their own letters what they had judged. But there are some things placed in those very proceedings in which he partly suppressed the charges by evading them, and partly confused everything in total obscurity by twisting many words back on himself; some he cleared, as it could seem for the time, by false arguments rather than true reasoning, denying some and turning others by false interpretation.

### Translation notes

- The proceedings are those of the Synod of Diospolis (415).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 183.3 (CSEL 44:726–727; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-3).

## Letter 183.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-4
- Source: CSEL 44:727–729
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent hopes Pelagius will truly convert and seek pardon, but declines to summon him to Rome.

### Latin text

Sed utinam, quod optandum magis est, iam se ille ad ueram catholicae fidei uiam ab illo sui tramitis errore conuertat, ut cupiat uelitque purgari considerans cotidianam dei gratiam adiutoriumque cognoscens, ut uideatur uerum et adprobetur ab omnibus manifesta ratione correctus non gestorum indicio sed ad catholicam fidem corde conuerso! unde non possumus illorum nec adprobare nec culpare iudicium, cum nesciamus, utrum uera sint gesta, ut, si uera sunt, illum constet magis subterfugisse, quam se tota ueritate purgasse. qui si confidit nouitque non nostra dignum esse damnatione, quod dicat, aut iam hoc totum se refutasse, quod dixerat, non a nobis accersiri, sed ipse debet potius festinare, ut possit absolui. nam si adhuc taliter sentit, quando se nostro iudicio quibusuis accitus litteris, cum sciat damnandum esse, committit? quod si accersiendus esset, ab his melius fieret, qui magis proximi et non longo terrarum spatio uidentur esse disiuncti. sed non deerit cura, si medicinae praebeat ille materiam. potest enim damnare, quae senserat, ac datis litteris erroris sui, ut regressum ad nos decet, ueniam postulare, fratres carissimi.

### English translation (Claude)

But would that (and this is rather to be wished) he would now turn from the error of his path to the true way of the Catholic faith, so that he might desire and wish to be cleared, considering God's daily grace and recognizing his help; so that he might be seen to be truly corrected and be approved by all on manifest reasoning, not by the evidence of proceedings, but by a heart converted to the Catholic faith! Hence we can neither approve nor blame those men's judgment, since we do not know whether the proceedings are genuine; and if they are genuine, it is clear that he evaded rather than cleared himself with full truth. If he is confident and knows that what he says does not deserve our condemnation, or that he has already refuted everything he had said, he ought not to be summoned by us, but should rather hasten himself to be acquitted. For if he still thinks this way, when, summoned by any letter, would he submit himself to our judgment, knowing he must be condemned? And if he had to be summoned, it would be better done by those who seem nearer and not separated from him by a long distance. But care will not be lacking if he provides material for the medicine. For he can condemn what he had held and, by sending a letter, ask pardon for his error, as befits one returning to us, dearest brothers.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 183.4 (CSEL 44:727–729; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-4).

## Letter 183.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-5
- Source: CSEL 44:729–731
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Innocent condemns the book attributed to Pelagius and asks that he anathematize it for the sake of his followers.

### Latin text

Librum sane, qui eius esse diceretur, nobis a uestra caritate transmissum euoluimus. in quo multa contra dei gratiam legimus esse conscripta, multa blasphema, nihil quod placeret, nihil quod non penitus displiceret a quouis damnandum atque calcandum, cuius similia, nisi qui ista scripserat, nemo alter in mentem reciperet atque sentiret. nam hoc loco latius de lege disputare uelut coram posito repugnantique Pelagio necessarium esse non duximus, cum uobiscum totam scientibus parique nobiscum assensione gaudentibus conloquamur. tunc enim melius haec exempla ponuntur, quando cum his, quos harum constat rerum inprudentes esse, tractamus. nam de naturae possibilitate, de libero arbitrio et de omni dei gratia et cotidiana gratia cui non sit recte sentienti uberrimum disputare? anathemet ergo ista, quae sensit, ut illi, qui eius sermonibus fuerant praeceptisque conlapsi, quid tandem habeat fides uera, cognoscant. facilius enim reuocari poterunt, cum ista a suo senserint auctore damnari. quod si ille pertinaciter in hac uoluerit impietate persistere, agendum est, quatenus uel his possit subueniri, quos non suus sed huius magis error induxit, ne et illis haec medicina pereat, cuius iste talem non admittit nec postulat curam. [Et alia manu:] Deus uos incolumes custodiat, fratres carissimi. Dat. VI. Kl Febr.

### English translation (Claude)

We have read through the book said to be his, sent to us by your love. In it we read that many things were written against the grace of God, many blasphemous things, nothing that pleased, nothing that did not thoroughly displease, to be condemned and trampled on by anyone; things like which no one else but the man who wrote them would take into his mind and hold. For we did not think it necessary at this point to argue at greater length from the law, as if Pelagius were present and resisting, since we are conversing with you who know it all and rejoice with us in equal agreement. Such examples are better set out when we deal with those who are evidently ignorant of these matters. For on the capacity of nature, on free choice, and on all of God's grace and daily grace, who that thinks rightly would not have abundant matter for discussion? Let him then anathematize what he has held, so that those who had fallen through his sermons and precepts may know at last what the true faith holds. For they can be called back more easily when they perceive that these things are condemned by their own author. But if he chooses to persist obstinately in this impiety, action must be taken so that help may at least be given to those whom not their own error but rather his has led astray, lest the medicine be lost for them too, a cure which he neither admits nor asks for. [And in another hand:] May God keep you safe, dearest brothers. Given on the sixth day before the Kalends of February.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The book is Pelagius's On Nature, sent with Ep. 177. Date: 27 January 417.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 183.5 (CSEL 44:729–731; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-183-5).

## Letter 184.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-1
- Source: CSEL 44:732
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the monks Peter and Abraham, referring them to his works and promising a brief answer.

### Latin text

Sanctum quidem studium uestrum, quo a me multa putatis esse quaerenda, ut contentiosis impietatibus non inermes resistere ualeatis, nec debet iustitia spernere nec caritas potest. sed diligentem ad omnia responsionem una epistula, quamlibet sit prolixa, non capit. plurimis autem opusculis nostris aut ad omnia aut pene ad omnia, quae requiritis. iam me respondisse, quantum potui, noueritis. quae si legatis. quoniam sic uos audio instituisse uitam, qua deo seruitis, ut uobis ad legendum uacet, aut omnis uobis patebit instructio aut non multum existimo defuturum, praesertim quia inest uobis doctor interior, cuius gratia tales estis. nam quid hominem ad aliquid discendum adiuuat homo, si non simus docibiles domini? et in hac tamen epistula nequaquam expectationem uestram, sicut dominus adiuuat, breui saltem responsione fraudabo.

### English translation (Claude)

Your holy zeal, by which you think you must ask me many things so that you may be able to resist contentious impieties not unarmed, neither ought justice to spurn nor can love. But a careful answer to everything cannot be contained in one letter, however long. Know, however, that in very many of my little works I have already answered, as best I could, all or nearly all the things you ask about. If you read them (since I hear you have so arranged the life in which you serve God that you have leisure for reading), either the whole instruction will be open to you, or I think not much will be lacking, especially since there is within you the inner Teacher by whose grace you are what you are. For how does a man help a man to learn anything, if we are not taught by the Lord? Yet even in this letter, as the Lord helps, I will not cheat your expectation, at least of a brief answer.

### Scripture references

- John 6:45: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Peter and Abraham, apparently monks. Allusion: John 6:45 (Isa 54:13), “taught by the Lord.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.1 (CSEL 44:732; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-1).

## Letter 184.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-2
- Source: CSEL 44:732–733
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Unbaptized infants are condemned, though with the lightest punishment; there is no middle place between kingdom and punishment.

### Latin text

Dominus ait: Qui crediderit et baptizatus fuerit, saluus erit; qui autem non crediderit, condemnabitur. si ergo. paruuli cum baptizantur, non inaniter dicitur, sed ueraciter agitur. ut inter credentes habeantur, unde etiam noua proles ore Christianorum omnium nuncupantur, profecto, si non crediderint, condemnabuntur ac per hoc, quia nihil ipsi male uiuendo addiderunt ad originale peccatum, potest eorum merito dici in illa damnatione minima poena, non tamen nulla. quisquis autem putat diuersitatem futuram non esse poenarum, legat, quod scriptum est: Tolerabilius erit Sodomae in die iudicii quam illi ciuitati. non ergo a deceptoribus inter regnum et supplicium medius locus quaeratur infantibus, sed transeant a diabolo ad Christum, hoc est a morte ad uitam, ne ira dei maneat super eos; ab hac quippe ira dei non liberat nisi gratia dei. quid est autem ira dei nisi a deo iusto poena debita atque uindicta? neque enim deus aliqua commotione turbatur, sicut irascitur mutabilis animus; sed ea, quae dicitur ira dei, nihil est aliud quam iusta poena peccati, quae non mirum quod transit in posteros.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord says, “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; but whoever does not believe will be condemned.” If, then, when little children are baptized, it is not said in vain but truly done that they are counted among believers (for which reason they are also called “the faithful” by the mouths of all Christians), then surely, if they have not believed, they will be condemned. And so, since they have added nothing to original sin by living badly, their punishment in that condemnation can rightly be called the lightest, but not none. Whoever thinks that there will be no difference of punishments, let him read what is written: “It will be more tolerable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for that city.” So let not a middle place between the kingdom and punishment be sought for infants from deceivers; but let them pass from the devil to Christ, that is, from death to life, so that the wrath of God may not remain on them; for nothing frees from this wrath of God but the grace of God. And what is the wrath of God but the punishment and penalty owed by the just God? For God is not disturbed by any emotion, as a changeable mind is angered; but what is called the wrath of God is nothing other than the just punishment of sin, which it is not surprising passes to descendants.

### Scripture references

- Mark 16:16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:15: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:24: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:36: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Mark 16:16; Matt 10:15; John 5:24; John 3:36. “The faithful” renders fideles, the term for the baptized. Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.2 (CSEL 44:732–733; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-2).

## Letter 184.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-3
- Source: CSEL 44:733–734
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Fleshly concupiscence, a result of the fall, accompanies all procreation except Christ's, so all who are born must be reborn.

### Latin text

Concupiscentia quippe carnalis, qua seminantur et concipiuntur, non erat ante peccatum nec fuisset omnino, nisi hominis inoboedientiam poena reciproca etiam suae carnis inoboedientia sequeretur. quo malo quamuis bene utatur nuptiarum bonum, non tamen sine illo fieri potest etiam nuptialis, id est liberorum procreandorum causa licitus honestusque concubitus; sine illo autem fieri posset, si humana in eo statu, in quo condita est, non peccando natura mansisset. possent enim membra etiam genitalia sicut cetera ad opus proprium peragendum nutu uoluntatis moueri, non aestu libidinis excitari. nam quis neget illa dei uerba: Crescite et multiplicamini non maledictionem peccatorum sed benedictionem fuisse nuptiarum? per hanc ergo concupiscentiam quia neque seminatus neque conceptus est Christus, quoniam se longe aliter habuit uirginis partus, per hanc, inquam, concupiscentiam quicquid hominum seminatur, concipitur, nascitur, ne puniatur. opus est renascatur. quia, etsi de renatis parentibus nascitur, non potest huic praestare generatio carnalis, quod illis non praestitit nisi regeneratio spiritalis. sicut non solum de oleastri sed etiam de oliuae semine non nascitur nisi oleaster, quamuis olea non sit oleaster. multa de his etiam in aliis nostris litteris diximus, quae uolo potius ut legatis, quam nos eadem repetere cogatis.

### English translation (Claude)

For fleshly concupiscence, by which they are sown and conceived, did not exist before sin, nor would it have existed at all, had not the disobedience of man been followed, as a reciprocal punishment, by the disobedience of his own flesh. Although the good of marriage makes good use of this evil, still even marital intercourse, that is, intercourse lawful and honorable for the sake of procreating children, cannot take place without it; but it could have taken place without it if human nature had remained, by not sinning, in the state in which it was created. For even the genital members, like the others, could have been moved to perform their proper work at the bidding of the will, not stirred by the heat of lust. For who would deny that those words of God, “Increase and multiply,” were not the curse of sins but the blessing of marriage? Since, then, Christ was neither sown nor conceived through this concupiscence, for the virgin's childbearing was quite otherwise, whatever human being is sown, conceived, and born through this concupiscence must be reborn, so as not to be punished. For even if he is born of reborn parents, carnal generation cannot give him what was given to them only by spiritual regeneration; just as from the seed not only of the wild olive but also of the olive only a wild olive is born, although the olive is not a wild olive. We have said much about these things in other writings of ours too, which I would rather you read than make us repeat the same things.

### Scripture references

- Gen 1:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:17–24: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Gen 1:28. Allusion: Rom 11:17–24 (olive and wild olive). Augustine's teaching on marriage and concupiscence is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.3 (CSEL 44:733–734; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-3).

## Letter 184.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-4
- Source: CSEL 44:734
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Unbelievers must be answered by argument, but faith is God's gift and must be prayed for, as Paul, Christ, and Stephen prayed for their persecutors.

### Latin text

Infidelibus uero, qui nulla tenentur Christianorum auctoritate librorum, operosius respondetur. neque eorum prauitas potest diuinae scripturae pondere corrigi, aduersus quos potius ipsa, quae ab eis apertius accusatur, debet utique scriptura defendi. quod si et uos dominus ut ualeatis adiuuerit, parum tamen agitis apud eos, quos cupitis esse Christianos, si eorum infidelitatem ueracibus disputationibus uincitis, nisi eis et fidem supplicibus orationibus poscatis. et ipsa quippe, ut scitis, fides munus est dei, qui unicuique partitur mensuram fidei, et tale munus, quod intellectum necessarium est ut praecedat. non enim propheta fallitur dicens: Nisi credideritis. non intellegetis. et quia nisi........................... ut crederent, non pro iam fidelibus sed adhuc pro infidelibus Iudaeis orabat apostolus, quando dicebat: Fratres, bona uoluntas quidem cordis mei et deprecatio ad deum fit pro illis in salutem, pro illis scilicet, qui occiderant Christum, qui profecto istum quoque, si potestas daretur, occiderent, pro qualibus et dominus. cum pendens inrideretur, et beatus Stephanus, cum lapidaretur, orauit.

### English translation (Claude)

To unbelievers, however, who are bound by no authority of the Christian books, it is harder to reply. Their perversity cannot be corrected by the weight of divine Scripture; rather, against them Scripture itself, which they attack quite openly, must be defended. Even if the Lord helps you to be able to do this, you still achieve little with those whom you want to become Christians if you conquer their unbelief by truthful arguments, unless you also ask faith for them by humble prayers. For faith itself, as you know, is a gift of God, who apportions to each the measure of faith, and such a gift that it must precede understanding. For the prophet is not mistaken who says, “Unless you believe, you will not understand.” And because, unless … that they might believe, the apostle prayed not for those already faithful but for the Jews who were still unbelievers, when he said, “Brothers, my heart's good will and prayer to God for them is for their salvation”: for them, that is, who had killed Christ and who would surely have killed him too, if they had been given the power; for such as these the Lord too prayed while he hung mocked on the cross, and blessed Stephen while he was being stoned.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:3: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 7:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:1: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:34: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 7:60: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text has a row of dots after “nisi” (a gap); translated with “…”.
- Quotations and allusions: Rom 12:3; Isa 7:9 (LXX wording); Rom 10:1; Luke 23:34; Acts 7:60. The remark about the Jews is Augustine's, translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.4 (CSEL 44:734; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-4).

## Letter 184.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-5
- Source: CSEL 44:734–735
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes the plan and progress of the City of God (ten books done, the fourteenth in hand), which will answer their questions.

### Latin text

Istorum sane infidelium, quos uel gentiles uel iam uulgo usitato uocabulo paganos appellare consueuimus, quoniam duo sunt genera, unum eorum, qui superstitiones, quas putant. Christianae religioni anteponunt, alterum eorum, qui nullo religionis nomine obstricti sunt, ego in quibusdam libris, quos de ciuitate dei praenotaui, quorum ad uos existimo iam peruenisse notitiam et quorum adhuc reliquos, si dominus uoluerit, absoluendos in mediis meis occupationibus molior, aduersus primum istorum genus, quod apostolus notat, ubi dicit: Quae immolant gentes, daemoniis et non deo immolant, uel certe, ubi dicit: Coluerunt et seruierunt creaturae potius quam creatori, decem uolumina non parua confeci, quorum priora quinque illos redarguunt, qui propter adipiscendam uel retinendam humanarum rerum istam terrenam temporalemque felicitatem non unius summi et ueri sed multorum deorum cultum necessarium esse contendunt. posteriora uero alia quinque contra illos sunt, qui se aduersus salutarem doctrinam tumidius et inflatius extollentes ad beatitudinem, quae post hanc uitam speratur, etiam per daemonum multorumque deorum cultum existimant peruenire. ubi et nobiles eorum philosophi tribus in his quinque sed ultimis libris refelluntur a nobis. ceteri ab undecimo quot esse potuerint, quorum iam tres absolui, quartum in manibus habeo, ea, quae nos de ciuitate dei tenemus et credimus, continebunt, ne aliena tantum modo refutare, non etiam nostra in hoc opere adserere uoluisse uideamur. iste autem post decem quartus idemque totius operis quartus decimus liber, si dominus uoluerit, enodatas habebit omnes, quas mihi proposuistis in uestra epistula, quaestiones.

### English translation (Claude)

There are two kinds of these unbelievers, whom we are accustomed to call either Gentiles or, by the word now in common use, pagans: one of those who prefer what they think are their religious practices to the Christian religion, the other of those who are bound by no name of religion. In certain books which I have entitled On the City of God, which I think have already come to your notice, and whose remaining books I am working to finish, if the Lord wills, in the midst of my occupations, I have completed ten volumes of no small size against the first of these kinds, which the apostle marks when he says, “What the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God,” or certainly when he says, “They worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.” The first five of these refute those who maintain that the worship not of the one supreme and true God but of many gods is necessary for obtaining or keeping the earthly and temporal happiness of human affairs. The other, later five are against those who, exalting themselves proudly and arrogantly against saving doctrine, think they can attain the blessedness hoped for after this life even through the worship of demons and many gods. There, in the last three of these five books, their noble philosophers are refuted by us. The rest, from the eleventh on, however many there may be, of which I have finished three and have the fourth in hand, will contain what we hold and believe about the City of God, so that we may not seem in this work to have wished only to refute others' views and not also to assert our own. This fourth after the ten, which is also the fourteenth book of the whole work, will, if the Lord wills, have unraveled all the questions you put to me in your letter.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 10:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:25: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Civ. 1–14 (City of God): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 10:20; Rom 1:25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.5 (CSEL 44:734–735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-5).

## Letter 184.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-6
- Source: CSEL 44:735–736
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Against those who deny God or his providence, the City of God will show that God exists and cares for human affairs.

### Latin text

Porro cum altero infidelium genere, qui uel uim nullam esse diuinam credunt uel ad eam res humanas pertinere non credunt, nescio utrum sermo sit habendus de aliqua quaestione pietatis, quamuis non fere quisquam nostris temporibus reperiatur ita stultus, qui uel in corde suo dicere audeat: Non est deus. illi autem alii stulti non desunt, qui dixerunt: Non uidebit dominus, id est prouidentiam suam in haec terrena non tendit. uerum tamen in his libris, quos uolo ut legat caritas uestra, dum adseritur ciuitas dei, non solum esse deum, quod natura insitum uix ulla umquam extirpat impietas, sed etiam rerum humanarum curam gerere ab ipsa institutione hominum usque ad beatificandos iustos cum angelis sanctis et damnandos impios cum angelis malignis, si deus uoluerit et quibus uoluerit, credibile fiet.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the other kind of unbelievers, who believe either that there is no divine power or that human affairs are no concern of it, I do not know whether one should discuss any question of piety with them, although hardly anyone is found in our times so foolish as to dare to say even in his heart, “There is no God.” But there is no lack of those other fools who have said, “The Lord will not see,” that is, he does not extend his providence to these earthly things. Yet in these books, which I want your love to read, while the City of God is asserted, it will be made credible, if God wills and to whom he wills, not only that God exists, which is implanted by nature and which scarcely any impiety ever uproots, but also that he takes care of human affairs, from the very creation of mankind to the blessing of the righteous with the holy angels and the condemnation of the ungodly with the evil angels.

### Scripture references

- Ps 14:1 (13:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:7 (93:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Augustine, Civ. (City of God): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 14:1 (53:1); Ps 94:7 (93:7 LXX/Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.6 (CSEL 44:735–736; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-6).

## Letter 184.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-7
- Source: CSEL 44:736
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends his books through the presbyter Firmus.

### Latin text

Non itaque ulterius oneranda est haec epistula, dilectissimi. ubi enim speretis per ministerium nostrum nosse, quod uultis, satis diximus et eosdem libros, si nondum habetis, ut habere possitis, per sanctum fratrem et conpresbyterum meum Firmum, qui uos multum diligit nobisque diligendos diligentius intimauit, ut uestrae mutuae dilectioni gratias agat, pro nostrae tenuitatis facultate curauimus.

### English translation (Claude)

So this letter must not be burdened further, dearly beloved. For we have said enough about where you may hope to learn what you wish through our ministry; and we have taken care, as far as our slender means allow, that you may have these books, if you do not yet have them, through my holy brother and fellow presbyter Firmus, who loves you much and has commended you to us very earnestly to be loved, so that he may give thanks for your mutual love.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 184.7 (CSEL 44:736; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-184-7).

## Letter 185.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-1
- Source: CSEL 57:1–2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains to Boniface, a military officer, that the Donatists, unlike the Arians, confess one substance of the Trinity and differ only over communion.

### Latin text

Laudo et gratulor et admiror, fili dilectissime Bonifati, quod inter curas bellorum et armorum uehementer desideras ea nosse, quae dei sunt. uere hinc te apparet etiam de ipsa uirtute militari fidei seruire, quam habes in Christo. ut ergo breuiter insinuem dilectioni tuae, inter Arrianorum et Donatistarum quid intersit errorem, Arriani patris et filii et spiritus sancti diuersas substantias esse dicunt, Donatistae autem non hoc dicunt, sed unam trinitatis substantiam confitentur. et si aliqui ipsorum minorem filium esse dixerunt, quam pater est, eiusdem tamen substantiae non negarunt; plurimi uero in eis hoc se dicunt omnino credere de patre et filio et spiritu sancto, quod catholica. credit ecclesia. nec ipsa cum illis uertitur quaestio, sed de sola communione infeliciter litigant et contra unitatem Christi rebelles inimicitias peruersitate sui erroris exerent. aliquando autem, sicut audiuimus. nonnulli ex ipsis uolentes sibi Gothos conciliare, quando eos uident aliquid posse, dicunt hoc se credere, quod et illi credunt. sed maiorum suorum auctoritate uincuntur, quia nec Donatus ipse sic credidisse adseritur, de cuius parte se esse gloriantur.

### English translation (Claude)

I praise, congratulate, and admire you, dearest son Boniface, because amid the cares of wars and arms you earnestly desire to know the things that are God's. Truly it appears from this that even by your military valor you serve the faith that you have in Christ. So, to explain briefly to your love the difference between the error of the Arians and that of the Donatists: the Arians say that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are of different substances; the Donatists do not say this, but confess one substance of the Trinity. And if some of them have said that the Son is less than the Father, they have not denied that he is of the same substance; but most of them say that they believe about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit altogether what the Catholic Church believes. Nor is this the question at issue with them; they quarrel unhappily about communion alone, and by the perversity of their error they carry on rebellious hostilities against the unity of Christ. Sometimes, however, as we have heard, some of them, wishing to win over the Goths, when they see that they have some power, say that they believe what the Goths believe. But they are refuted by the authority of their own predecessors, because not even Donatus himself, whose party they boast of belonging to, is said to have believed so.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Boniface, tribune and later count in Africa; the letter is also known as On the Correction of the Donatists. The Goths were Arian.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.1 (CSEL 57:1–2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-1).

## Letter 185.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-2
- Source: CSEL 57:2
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Heresies were foretold to test faith and love; the Donatists accept Christ from Scripture but not the church that Scripture also proclaims.

### Latin text

Non te autem ista conturbent, fili dilectissime. haereses enim et scandala futura praedicta sunt, ut inter inimicos erudiamur ac sic et fides et dilectio nostra possit esse probatior, fides utique, ne ab eis decipiamur, dilectio autem, ut etiam ipsis corrigendis, quantum possumus, consulamus non solum instantes, ne infirmis noceant atque ut ab errore nefario liberentur, sed etiam orantes pro eis, ut aperiat illis dominus sensum et intellegant scripturas, quia in sanctis libris, ubi manifestatur dominus Christus, ibi et eius ecclesia declaratur. isti autem mirabili caecitate, cum ipsum Christum praeter scripturas nesciant, eius tamen ecclesiam non diuinarum litterarum auctoritate cognoscunt, sed humanarum calumniarum uanitate confingunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But do not let these things disturb you, dearest son. For heresies and scandals were foretold to come, so that we might be instructed among enemies, and so both our faith and our love might be more proven: our faith, so that we may not be deceived by them, and our love, so that we may also take thought for correcting them as far as we can, not only pressing them so that they may not harm the weak and may be freed from wicked error, but also praying for them, that the Lord may open their minds and they may understand the Scriptures. For in the holy books, where the Lord Christ is made manifest, there his church is also declared. But these men, with a wonderful blindness, while they know Christ himself only from the Scriptures, do not recognize his church by the authority of the divine writings, but invent it out of the vanity of human slanders.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:19: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 18:7: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 24:45: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 11:19; Matt 18:7; Luke 24:45.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.2 (CSEL 57:2; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-2).

## Letter 185.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-3
- Source: CSEL 57:2–3
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The same Scriptures that foretell Christ foretell a church spread through all nations, not confined to Africa.

### Latin text

Agnoscunt nobiscum Christum in eo, quod legitur: Foderunt manus meas et pedes, dinumerauerunt omnia ossa mea; ipsi uero considerauerunt et conspexerunt me; diuiserunt sibi uestimenta mea et super uestem meam miserunt sortem, et nolunt agnoscere ecclesiam in eo, quod post paululum sequitur: Commemorabuntur et conuertentur ad dominum uniuersi fines terrae et adorabunt in conspectu eius uniuersae patriae gentium, quoniam domini est regnum et ipse dominabitur gentium. agnoscunt nobiscum Christum in eo, quod legitur: Dominus dixit ad me: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, et nolunt agnoscere ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. agnoscunt nobiscum Christum in eo, quod ipse dominus in euangelio loquitur: Oportebat Christum pati et resurgere a mortuis tertio die. et nolunt agnoscere ecclesiam in eo, quod sequitur: Et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes incipientibus ab Hierusalem. et innumerabilia sunt testimonia sanctorum librorum, quae in hunc librum coartare non debui. in quibus sicut apparet dominus Christus siue secundum diuinitatem aequalem patri. quae in principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum, siue secundum susceptae carnis humilitatem, quia uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. sic apparet etiam eius ecclesia non in sola Africa, sicut isti inpudentissima uanitate delirant, sed toto terrarum orbe diffusa.

### English translation (Claude)

With us they recognize Christ in what is read: “They pierced my hands and feet; they numbered all my bones; they looked and stared at me; they divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots”; and they refuse to recognize the church in what follows shortly after: “All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations shall worship before him; for the kingdom is the Lord's, and he shall rule over the nations.” With us they recognize Christ in what is read: “The Lord said to me, ‘You are my Son; today I have begotten you’”; and they refuse to recognize the church in what follows: “Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance and the ends of the earth as your possession.” With us they recognize Christ in what the Lord himself says in the Gospel: “It was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day”; and they refuse to recognize the church in what follows: “and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem.” And countless are the testimonies of the holy books, which I ought not to crowd into this book. In them, just as the Lord Christ appears, whether according to his divinity, equal to the Father, in which “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” or according to the lowliness of the flesh he took on, because “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us,” so his church also appears, not in Africa alone, as these men rave with most shameless vanity, but spread throughout the whole world.

### Scripture references

- Ps 22:16–18 (21:17-21 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 22:27–28 (21:28-21 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:7–8: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:46–47: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 22:16–18 (21:17–19 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 22:27–28 (21:28–29); Ps 2:7–8; Luke 24:46–47; John 1:1, 14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.3 (CSEL 57:2–3; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-3).

## Letter 185.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-4
- Source: CSEL 57:3–4
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even if Caecilian were guilty, the worldwide church of Christ should not be abandoned because of one man.

### Latin text

Testimoniis enim diuinis lites suas praeferunt, quia in causa Caeciliani, quondam ecclesiae Carthaginensis, episcopi, cui crimina obiecerunt, quae nec potuerunt probare nec possunt, se ab ecclesia catholica, hoc est ab unitate omnium gentium diuiserunt. quamuis et si uera essent, quae ab eis obiecta sunt Caeciliano, et nobis possent aliquando monstrari, ipsum iam mortuum anathematizaremus. sed tamen ecclesiam Christi. quae non litigiosis opinionibus fingitur, sed diuinis adtestationibus comprobatur, propter quemlibet hominem relinquere non debemus, quia bonum est confidere in domino. quam confidere in homine. neque enim, quod sine iniuria innocentiae illius dixerim, si peccauit Caecilianus, ideo hereditatem suam perdidit Christus. facile est homini seu uera seu falsa de altero homine credere, sed sceleratae inpudentiae est propter crimina hominis, quae orbi terrarum non possis ostendere. communionem orbis terrarum uelle damnare.

### English translation (Claude)

For they prefer their own quarrels to the divine testimonies, because in the case of Caecilian, formerly bishop of the church of Carthage, against whom they brought charges which they neither could nor can prove, they separated themselves from the Catholic Church, that is, from the unity of all nations. Yet even if the charges they brought against Caecilian were true and could at some time be shown to us, we would anathematize him, though now dead; but still we ought not to abandon, for the sake of any man, the church of Christ, which is not invented by contentious opinions but proved by divine testimonies; because it is better to trust in the Lord than to trust in man. For (I may say it without injury to his innocence) if Caecilian sinned, Christ did not therefore lose his inheritance. It is easy for a man to believe things true or false about another man; but it is a mark of wicked shamelessness to wish to condemn the communion of the whole world because of a man's crimes which you cannot show to the world.

### Scripture references

- Ps 118:8 (117:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 118:8 (117:8 LXX/Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.4 (CSEL 57:3–4; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-4).

## Letter 185.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-5
- Source: CSEL 57:4–5
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The charges against Caecilian rest on human testimony, while the worldwide church rests on the testimony of law, prophets, psalms, apostle, and Christ.

### Latin text

Utrum Caecilianus a traditoribus diuinorum codicum fuerit ordinatus, nescio; non uidi, ab inimicis eius audiui: non mihi de lege dei, non de praeconio prophetarum. non de sanctitate psalmorum, non de Christi apostolo. non de Christi eloquio recitatur. ecclesiam uero toto terrarum orbe diffusam. cui non communicat pars Donati, uniuersarum scripturarum testimonia consona uoce proclamant. in semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes, lex dei dixit: ab ortu solis usque ad occasum sacrificium mundum offertur nomini meo. quoniam glorificatum est nomen meum in gentibus, per prophetam deus dixit; dominabitur a mari usque ad mare et a flumine usque ad terminos orbis terrae. per psalmum deus dixit: fructificans et crescens in uniuerso mundo, per apostolum deus dixit: eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in tota et Samaria et usque in fines terrae, filius dei ore suo dixit. Caecilianus, ecclesiae Carthaginensis episcopus. humanis litibus accusatur, ecclesia Christi in omnibus gentibus constituta diuinis uocibus commendatur. ipsa pietas, ueritas, caritas nos non permittit contra Caecilianum eorum hominum accipere testimonium, quos in ecclesia non uidemus, cui deus perhibet testimonium; qui enim diuina testimonia non sequuntur, pondus humani testimonii perdiderunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Whether Caecilian was ordained by betrayers of the divine books, I do not know; I did not see it; I heard it from his enemies. It is not read out to me from the law of God, not from the proclamation of the prophets, not from the holiness of the psalms, not from an apostle of Christ, not from the speech of Christ. But the church spread throughout the whole world, with which the party of Donatus is not in communion, the testimonies of all the Scriptures proclaim with one voice. “In your seed all nations shall be blessed,” said the law of God. “From the rising of the sun to its setting a pure sacrifice is offered to my name, for my name is glorified among the nations,” God said through the prophet. “He shall rule from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth,” God said through the psalm. “Bearing fruit and growing in the whole world,” God said through the apostle. “You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth,” the Son of God said with his own mouth. Caecilian, bishop of the church of Carthage, is accused by human quarrels; the church of Christ established in all nations is commended by divine voices. Piety, truth, and love themselves do not allow us to accept against Caecilian the testimony of men whom we do not see in the church to which God bears witness; for those who do not follow the divine testimonies have lost the weight of human testimony.

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:18: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:11: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:6: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text repeats a phrase in the quotation of Acts 1:8 and lacks “Judea”; the repetition is removed and the verse is translated as Scripture has it.
- Quotations: Gen 22:18; Mal 1:11; Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX/Vulgate); Col 1:6; Acts 1:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.5 (CSEL 57:4–5; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-5).

## Letter 185.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-6
- Source: CSEL 57:5–6
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists themselves first appealed to Emperor Constantine against Caecilian, so they cannot fault Catholics for appealing to emperors.

### Latin text

Addo. quod Caeciliani causam ipsi ad imperatoris Constantini iudicium accusando miserunt, immo uero ipsum Caecilianum post episcopalia iudicia, ubi eum opprimere non potuerunt, ad supra dicti imperatoris examen pertinacissimis persecutoribus perduxerunt. et quod in nobis modo reprehendunt, ut decipiant inperitos, dicentes non debere Christianos contra inimicos Christi aliquid a Christianis imperatoribus postulare, ipsi priores fecerunt. quod etiam in conlatione, quam simul apud Carthaginem habuimus, negare non ausi sunt, immo et gloriari ausi sunt, quod apud imperatorem maiores eorum criminaliter Caecilianum fuerint insecuti. insuper addentes mendacium, quod eum illic uicerint fecerintque damnari. quo modo ergo ipsi non sunt persecutores, qui cum accusando persecuti sint Caecilianum et ab eo fuerint superati. falsam sibi gloriam inpudentissimo mendacio adrogare uoluerunt non solum culpam non putantes uerum etiam pro sua laude iactantes, si probarent Caecilianum maioribus suis accusantibus fuisse damnatum? quem ad modum autem in ipsa conlatione modis omnibus uicti sint, quoniam ualde prolixa sunt gesta et tibi aliis rebus Romanae paci necessariis occupato multum est ut legantur, breuiarium eorum tibi legi forsitan poterit. quod credo habere fratrem et coepiscopum meum Optatum aut, si non habet, potest facillime accipere de ecclesia Sitifensi. quando quidem etiam liber iste iam sua prolixitate curis tuis forsitan onerosus est.

### English translation (Claude)

I add that they themselves, as accusers, sent the case of Caecilian to the judgment of the emperor Constantine; or rather, after the episcopal judgments, where they could not crush him, they brought Caecilian himself, as most obstinate persecutors, to the examination of that emperor. And what they now blame in us, to deceive the ignorant, saying that Christians ought not to ask anything of Christian emperors against the enemies of Christ, they themselves did first. They did not dare to deny this even at the conference we held together at Carthage; indeed they even dared to boast that their predecessors had prosecuted Caecilian criminally before the emperor, adding moreover the lie that they had defeated him there and had him condemned. How then are they not persecutors, who, when they had persecuted Caecilian by accusing him and had been defeated by him, wished to claim false glory for themselves by a most shameless lie, not only not thinking it a fault but even boasting of it to their own praise, if they could prove that Caecilian had been condemned on their predecessors' accusation? How they were beaten in every way at that conference, since the proceedings are very long, and it is much for you, occupied with other matters necessary for the Roman peace, to have them read, perhaps a summary of them could be read to you. I believe my brother and fellow bishop Optatus has it, or, if he does not, he can very easily get it from the church of Sitifis; since even this book, by its length, may perhaps be burdensome to your cares.

### Translation notes

- The conference is that of Carthage in 411. Augustine's own Summary of the Conference with the Donatists is meant. Optatus here is a contemporary bishop, not Optatus of Milevis.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.6 (CSEL 57:5–6; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-6).

## Letter 185.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-7
- Source: CSEL 57:6–7
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The imperial laws against the Donatists, like the lions turned on Daniel's accusers, have in fact helped many by correcting them.

### Latin text

Hoc enim contigit Donatistis, quod accusatoribus sancti Danihelis. sicut enim in illos leones, sic in istos conuersae sunt leges, quibus innocentem opprimere uoluerunt, nisi quod propter misericordiam Christi magis pro eis sunt istae leges. quae illis uidentur aduersae, quoniam multi per illas correcti sunt et cotidie corriguntur et se esse correctos atque ab illa furiosa pernicie liberatos gratias agunt. et, qui oderant. diligunt molestasque sibi fuisse saluberrimas leges. quantum in insania detestabantur, tantum recepta sanitate gratulantur et in residuos, cum quibus fuerant perituri, iam simili dilectione nobiscum, ut pariter instemus, ne illi pereant, excitantur. molestus est enim et medicus furenti phrenetico et pater indisciplinato filio, ille ligando ille caedendo. sed ambo diligendo. si autem illos neglegant et perire permittant. ista potius falsa mansuetudo crudelis est. si enim equus et mulus. quibus non est intellectus, morsibus et calcibus resistunt hominibus, a quibus eorum curanda uulnera contrectantur. et. cum inter dentes eorum et ungulas saepe homines periclitentur et aliquando uexentur, non tamen eos deserunt. donec per dolores et molestias medicinales reuocent ad salutem. quanto magis homo ab homine et frater a fratre, ne in aeternum pereat, non est deserendus, qui correctus intellegere potest, quantum sibi praestabatur beneficium, quando se persecutionem perpeti querebatur!

### English translation (Claude)

For what happened to the Donatists is what happened to the accusers of holy Daniel. For as the lions were turned against those men, so against these were turned the laws by which they wished to crush an innocent man; except that, by the mercy of Christ, these laws which seem to be against them are rather for them, since many have been corrected by them and are being corrected daily, and they give thanks that they have been corrected and freed from that raging destruction. Those who hated now love, and they rejoice, now that they have recovered their sanity, that the laws that troubled them were most salutary, as much as they hated them in their madness; and toward the rest, with whom they would have perished, they are now stirred by a love like ours, so that we may press together that those may not perish. For the physician is troublesome to the raving madman, and the father to the undisciplined son, the one by binding, the other by beating, but both by loving. But if they neglected them and let them perish, that false gentleness would rather be cruel. For if the horse and the mule, which have no understanding, resist with bites and kicks the men who handle their wounds to cure them, and though men are often in danger between their teeth and hooves and are sometimes hurt, still they do not abandon them until, by healing pains and troubles, they bring them back to health: how much more must a man not be abandoned by a man, and a brother by a brother, so that he may not perish forever, who, once corrected, can understand how great a benefit was being done him when he complained that he was suffering persecution!

### Scripture references

- Dan 6:24: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 32:9 (31:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Dan 6:24; Ps 32:9 (31:9 LXX/Vulgate). Augustine's defense of coercive laws is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.7 (CSEL 57:6–7; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/182-1/#p-185-7).

## Letter 185.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-8
- Source: CSEL 57:7–8
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Emperors' laws for the truth rightly punish the Donatists, as Nebuchadnezzar's law protecting the true God was just.

### Latin text

Sicut ergo apostolus dicit, infatigabiles, cum tempus habemus, operemur bonum ad omnes. qui possunt catholicorum praedicatorum sermonibus, qui possunt catholicorum principum legibus partim per eos, qui diuinis admonitionibus, partim per eos, qui iussis imperialibus parent, omnes ad salutem uocentur, omnes a pernicie reuocentur, quia et imperatores quando pro falsitate contra ueritatem constituunt malas leges, probantur bene credentes et coronantur perseuerantes. quando autem pro ueritate contra falsitatem constituunt bonas leges, terrentur saeuientes et corriguntur intellegentes. quicumque ergo legibus imperatorum, quae contra dei ueritatem feruntur, obtemperare non uult, adquirit grande praemium: quicumque autem legibus imperatorum, quae pro dei ueritate feruntur, obtemperare non uult, adquirit grande supplicium. nam et temporibus prophetarum omnes reges, qui in populo dei non prohibuerunt nec euerterunt, quae contra dei praeceptum fuerant instituta, culpantur et, qui prohibuerunt et euerterunt. super aliorum merita laudantur. et rex Nabuchodonosor cum seruus esset idolorum, constituit sacrilegam legem, ut simulacrum adoraretur; sed eius impiae constitutioni qui oboedire noluerunt, pie fideliterque fecerunt. idem tamen rex diuino correctus miraculo piam et laudabilem legem pro ueritate constituit, ut, quicumque diceret blasphemiam in deum uerum Sidrac, Misac et Abdenago, cum domo sua penitus interiret. hanc legem si qui contempserunt et id, quod fuerat constitutum. merito perpessi sunt, debuerunt dicere, quod isti dicunt. se iustos esse, quia ex lege regis persecutionem patiebantur. quod utique dicerent, si ita insanirent, sicut isti insaniunt. qui diuidunt membra Christi et exsufflant sacramenta Christi et de persecutione gloriantur, quia prohibentur ista facere legibus imperatorum, quas constituerunt pro unitate Christi. et iactant fallaciter innocentiam suam et, quam non possunt a domino accipere, ab hominibus quaerunt martyrum gloriam.

### English translation (Claude)

So, as the apostle says, let us not grow weary, but while we have time let us do good to all. Let all who can be called to salvation, and recalled from destruction, be called by the sermons of Catholic preachers and by the laws of Catholic princes: partly through those who obey divine admonitions, partly through those who obey imperial orders. For when emperors make bad laws for falsehood against truth, those who believe rightly are tested and those who persevere are crowned; but when they make good laws for truth against falsehood, the raging are frightened and the understanding are corrected. Whoever, then, refuses to obey the laws of emperors that are passed against the truth of God gains a great reward; but whoever refuses to obey the laws of emperors that are passed for the truth of God gains a great punishment. For in the times of the prophets too, all the kings who did not forbid and overthrow among the people of God what had been instituted against God's commandment are blamed, and those who did forbid and overthrow it are praised above the merits of others. And King Nebuchadnezzar, when he was a slave of idols, made a sacrilegious law that the image should be worshiped; but those who refused to obey his impious decree acted piously and faithfully. Yet the same king, corrected by a divine miracle, made a pious and praiseworthy law for the truth, that whoever spoke blasphemy against the true God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego should perish utterly with his house. If any despised this law and justly suffered what had been decreed, they ought to have said what these men say: that they were righteous because they suffered persecution by the king's law. And they certainly would have said it, if they had been as mad as these men are, who divide the members of Christ, exorcise the sacraments of Christ, and boast of persecution because they are prohibited from doing these things by the laws of the emperors, which these have made for the unity of Christ; and they falsely boast of their innocence, and seek from men the glory of martyrs, which they cannot receive from the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:9–10: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 3:1–23: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:29: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Exorcise the sacraments” refers to the Donatist practice of rebaptizing Catholics. Quotations and allusions: Gal 6:9–10; Dan 3:1–23; Dan 3:29 (3:96 in the Greek numbering).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.8 (CSEL 57:7–8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-8).

## Letter 185.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-9
- Source: CSEL 57:8–9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: It is the cause, not the suffering, that makes a martyr: Sarah persecuted Hagar justly, while Saul persecuted David unjustly.

### Latin text

Ueri autem martyres illi sunt, de quibus dominus ait: Beati, qui persecutionem patiuntur propter iustitiam. non ergo qui propter iniquitatem et propter Christianae unitatis impiam diuisionem, sed qui propter iustitiam persecutionem patiuntur, hi martyres ueri sunt. nam et Agar passa est a Sarra persecutionem et illa erat sancta, quae faciebat, illa iniqua, quae patiebatur. numquid huic persecutioni, quam passa est Agar, comparandus est sanctus Dauid, quem persecutus est iniquus Saul? ualde utique distat, non quia patiebatur, sed quia propter iustitiam patiebatur. et ipse dominus cum latronibus crucifixus est; sed quos passio iungebat, causa separabat, ideo in psalmo uox illa intellegenda est uerorum martyrum uolentium se discerni a martyribus falsis: Iudica me, deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta; non dixit discerne poenam meam sed discerne causam meam. potest enim esse impiorum similis poena, sed dissimilis est martyrum causa, quorum et illa uox est: Iniuste persecuti sunt me, adiuua me; ideo se dignum existimauit, qui adiuuaretur iuste, quia illi persequebantur iniuste; nam si iuste illi persequerentur, non fuerat adiuuandus sed corrigendus.

### English translation (Claude)

But the true martyrs are those of whom the Lord says, “Blessed are those who suffer persecution for righteousness' sake.” Not, then, those who suffer persecution for iniquity and for the impious division of Christian unity, but those who suffer it for righteousness' sake, these are true martyrs. For Hagar too suffered persecution from Sarah; and she was holy who inflicted it, and she was wicked who suffered it. Is holy David, whom wicked Saul persecuted, to be compared with this persecution that Hagar suffered? There is certainly a great difference, not because he suffered, but because he suffered for righteousness' sake. And the Lord himself was crucified with robbers; but those whom the suffering joined, the cause separated. Therefore in the psalm that voice must be understood as that of the true martyrs, wishing to be distinguished from false martyrs: “Judge me, O God, and distinguish my cause from an unholy nation.” He did not say, “Distinguish my punishment,” but, “Distinguish my cause.” For the punishment of the ungodly can be similar, but the cause of the martyrs is dissimilar; theirs too is that voice: “They have persecuted me unjustly; help me.” He thought himself worthy to be helped justly because they were persecuting unjustly; for if they had been persecuting justly, he should not have been helped but corrected.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 16:6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Sam 19:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 23:33: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 43:1 (42:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:86 (118:86 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Matt 5:10; Gen 16:6; 1 Sam 18–26; Luke 23:33; Ps 43:1 (42:1 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 119:86 (118:86).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.9 (CSEL 57:8–9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-9).

## Letter 185.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-10
- Source: CSEL 57:9
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: By the Donatists' own claim that the true church suffers rather than inflicts persecution, Caecilian belonged to it and their predecessors did not.

### Latin text

Si autem putant, quod nemo possit iuste aliquem persequi, sicut in conlatione dixerunt illam esse ueram ecclesiam, quae persecutionem patitur, non quae facit, omitto dicere, quod superius commemoraui, quia, si ita est, ut dicunt, Caecilianus ad ueram ecclesiam pertinebat, quando eum maiores illorum usque ad imperatoris iudicium accusando persequebantur. nos enim dicimus ideo illum ad ueram ecclesiam pertinuisse, non quia persecutionem patiebatur, sed quia propter iustitiam patiebatur; illos autem ideo fuisse abalienatos ab ecclesia, non quia persequebantur, sed quia iniuste persequebantur. nos itaque hoc dicimus; illi uero si non quaerunt causas, quare quisque faciat persecutionem uel quare patiatur, sed hoc putant esse signum ueri Christiani, si persecutionem non faciat, sed patiatur, sine dubio Caecilianum in ea definitione constituunt, qui non faciebat, sed patiebatur; maiores autem suos ab ea definitione foras mittunt, qui faciebant, non patiebantur.

### English translation (Claude)

But if they think that no one can justly persecute anyone, as they said at the conference that the true church is the one that suffers persecution, not the one that inflicts it, I pass over what I mentioned above: that, if it is as they say, Caecilian belonged to the true church when their predecessors persecuted him by accusing him all the way to the emperor's judgment. For we say that he belonged to the true church not because he suffered persecution, but because he suffered it for righteousness' sake; and that they were estranged from the church not because they persecuted, but because they persecuted unjustly. This, then, is what we say. But if they do not look for the reasons why anyone inflicts or suffers persecution, but think that this is the mark of a true Christian, that he does not inflict persecution but suffers it, without doubt they place Caecilian within that definition, since he did not inflict but suffered; and they put their own predecessors outside that definition, since they inflicted and did not suffer.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.10 (CSEL 57:9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-10).

## Letter 185.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-11
- Source: CSEL 57:9–10
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: There is just and unjust persecution: the church pursues the ungodly out of love to correct them, as Sarah disciplined Hagar.

### Latin text

Sed hoc, ut dixi, omitto: illud dico: si ecclesia uera ipsa est, quae persecutionem patitur, non quae facit, quaerant ab apostolo, quam ecclesiam significabat Sarra, quando persecutionem faciebat ancillae. liberam quippe matrem nostram, caelestem Hierusalem, id est ueram dei ecclesiam in illa muliere dicit fuisse figuratam, quae affligebat ancillam. si autem melius discutiamus, magis illa persequebatur Sarram superbiendo quam illam Sarra cohercendo: illa enim faciebat iniuriam, ista inponebat superbiae disciplinam. deinde quaero. si boni et sancti nemini faciunt persecutionem. sed, tantum modo patiuntur, cuius putant esse in psalmo uocem. ubi legitur: Persequar inimicos meos et comprehendam illos et non conuertar. donec deficiant. Si ergo uerum dicere uel agnoscere uolumus, est persecutio iniusta. quam faciunt impii ecclesiae Christi. et est persecutio iusta, quam faciunt impiis ecclesiae Christi. ista itaque beata est. quae persecutionem patitur propter iustitiam, illi uero miseri, qui persecutionem patiuntur propter iniustitiam. proinde ista persequitur diligendo, illi saeuiendo, ista ut corrigat. illi ut euertant, ista ut reuocet ab errore, illi ut praecipitent in errorem; denique ista persequitur inimicos et comprehendit. donec deficiant in uanitate, ut in ueritate proficiant. illi autem retribuentes mala pro bonis, quia eis consulimus ad aeternam salutem, etiam temporalem nobis conantur auferre sic amantes homicidia, ut in se ipsis ea perficiant, quando in aliis perpetrare non possunt. sicut enim caritas laborat ecclesiae sic eos ab illa perditione liberare, ut eorum nemo moriatur. sic eorum laborat furor aut nos occidere, ut suae crudelitatis pascant libidinem, aut etiam se ipsos, ne perdidisse uideantur occidendorum hominum potestatem.

### English translation (Claude)

But this, as I said, I pass over; this I say: if the true church is the one that suffers persecution, not the one that inflicts it, let them ask the apostle what church Sarah signified when she inflicted persecution on the slave woman. For he says that our free mother, the heavenly Jerusalem, that is, the true church of God, was prefigured in that woman who afflicted the slave. But if we examine it better, the slave rather persecuted Sarah by her pride than Sarah her by restraining her: for the one was doing wrong, the other imposing discipline on pride. Next I ask: if good and holy people persecute no one but only suffer persecution, whose voice do they think it is in the psalm, where we read, “I will pursue my enemies and overtake them, and I will not turn back until they fail”? If, then, we wish to speak or recognize the truth, there is an unjust persecution, which the ungodly inflict on the church of Christ, and there is a just persecution, which the churches of Christ inflict on the ungodly. So the church is blessed which suffers persecution for righteousness' sake, but they are wretched who suffer persecution for unrighteousness. Accordingly, the church persecutes by loving, they by raging; the church in order to correct, they in order to overthrow; the church to call back from error, they to cast headlong into error. Finally, the church pursues its enemies and overtakes them until they fail in vanity, that they may advance in truth; but they, returning evil for good, because we take thought for their eternal salvation, try to take away even our temporal safety, so loving murder that they commit it on themselves when they cannot perpetrate it on others. For just as the church's love labors to free them from that perdition so that none of them may die, so their fury labors either to kill us, to feed the lust of their cruelty, or even to kill themselves, so as not to seem to have lost the power of killing people.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:22–31: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 18:37 (17:38 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 35:12 (34:12 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Gal 4:22–31; Ps 18:37 (17:38 LXX/Vulgate); Ps 35:12 (34:12). Augustine's notion of “just persecution” is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.11 (CSEL 57:9–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-11).

## Letter 185.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-12
- Source: CSEL 57:10–12
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' self-killing is an old custom, from provoking pagans and travelers to kill them to throwing themselves from cliffs or into fire and water.

### Latin text

Qui autem nesciunt consuetudinem illorum, putant eos modo se ipsos occidere, quando ab eorum insanissima dominatione per occasionem legum istarum, quae pro unitate sunt constitutae. tanti populi liberantur; qui autem sciunt. et ante ipsas leges quid facere soleant, non eorum mirantur mortes, sed recordantur mores. maxime, quando adhuc cultus fuerat idolorum, ad paganorum celeberrimas sollemnitates ingentia turbarum agmina ueniebant, non ut idola frangerent, sed ut interficerentur a cultoribus idolorum. nam illud si accepta legitima potestate facere uellent, si quid eis accidisset, possent habere qualemcumque umbram nominis martyrum: sed ad hoc solum ueniebant, ut integris idolis ipsi perimerentur: nam singuli quique ualentissimi iuuenes cultores idolorum. quot quis occideret, ipsis idolis uouere consueuerant. quidam etiam se trucidandos armatis uiatoribus ingerebant percussuros eos se, nisi ab eis perimerentur, terribiliter comminantes. nonnumquam et a iudicibus transeuntibus extorquebant uiolenter. ut a carnificibus uel ab officio ferirentur. unde quidam illos sic inlusisse perhibetur, ut eos tamquam percutiendos ligari et dimitti iuberet atque ita eorum impetum incruentus et inlaesus euaderet. iam uero per abrupta praecipitia, per aquas et flammas occidere se ipsos cotidianus illis ludus fuit. haec enim eos tria mortis genera diabolus docuit, ut mori uolentes, quando non inueniebant, quem terrerent, ut eius gladio ferirentur, per saxa se mitterent aut ignibus gurgitibusque donarent. quis autem illos haec docuisse credendus est possidens cor eorum nisi ille, qui et saluatori nostro, ut se de pinna templi praecipitaret, tamquam de lege suggessit? cuius suggestionem a se utique prohiberent, si magistrum Christum in corde portarent. sed quia in se diabolo potius dederunt locum, aut sic pereunt quem ad modum grex ille porcorum, quem de monte in mare daemonum turba deiecit. aut illis mortibus erepti et pio matris catholicae gremio collecti ita liberantur, quem ad modum est a domino liberatus. quem pater eius a daemonio sanandum obtulit dicens, quod aliquando cadere in aquam, aliquando in ignem soleret.

### English translation (Claude)

Those who do not know their custom think that they are killing themselves only now, when so many peoples are being freed from their insane domination on the occasion of these laws made for unity. But those who know what they used to do even before these laws are not surprised at their deaths, but remember their ways. Above all, when the worship of idols still existed, huge columns of crowds used to come to the most crowded festivals of the pagans, not to break the idols, but to be killed by the worshipers of idols. For if they had wished to do that with lawful authority, then, if anything had happened to them, they might have had some shadow of the name of martyrs; but they came only to be killed themselves while the idols remained intact. For the strongest young men among the idol worshipers each used to vow to the idols themselves as many as he might kill. Some even thrust themselves on armed travelers to be slaughtered, threatening terribly to strike them if they were not killed by them. Sometimes they violently extorted from passing judges that they be struck by executioners or by court officers. Hence one judge is said to have tricked them by ordering them to be bound as if to be executed and then let go, and so he escaped their onslaught unbloodied and unharmed. And indeed, killing themselves by steep precipices, by water and flames was a daily sport for them. The devil taught them these three kinds of death, so that, wishing to die, when they could find no one to frighten into striking them with his sword, they threw themselves over rocks or gave themselves to fires and whirlpools. Who must be believed to have taught them this, possessing their hearts, but he who also suggested to our Savior, as if from the law, that he throw himself down from the pinnacle of the temple? They would surely drive his suggestion away from themselves if they carried Christ as teacher in their hearts. But because they have rather given place to the devil in themselves, either they perish like that herd of swine which the crowd of demons cast down from the mountain into the sea, or, snatched from those deaths and gathered into the loving bosom of the Catholic mother, they are freed as was the boy whom his father brought to the Lord to be healed of a demon, saying that he used to fall sometimes into water, sometimes into fire.

### Scripture references

- Matt 4:5–6: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 5:13: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 17:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- This describes the Circumcellions associated with the Donatists. Allusions: Matt 4:5–6; Mark 5:13; Matt 17:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.12 (CSEL 57:10–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-12).

## Letter 185.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-13
- Source: CSEL 57:12–13
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The laws free many who were held in the Donatist sect by fear, and they now give thanks for being compelled.

### Latin text

Unde magna in eos fit misericordia, cum etiam per istas imperatorum leges ab illa secta, ubi per doctrinas daemoniorum mendaciloquorum mala ista didicerunt. prius eripiuntur inuiti, ut in catholica postea bonis praeceptis et moribus sanentur adsueti. nam multi eorum, quorum iam in unitate Christi pium fidei feruorem caritatemque miramur. cum magna laetitia deo gratias agunt, quod illo errore caruerunt, ubi mala ista bona putauerunt. quas gratias modo uolentes non agerent, nisi prius etiam nolentes ab illa nefaria societate discederent. quid de illis dicamus, qui nobis cotidie confitentur, quod iam olim uolebant esse catholici. sed inter eos habitabant, inter quos id, quod uolebant, esse non poterant per infirmitatem timoris, ubi, si unum uerbum pro catholica dicerent, et ipsi et domus eorum funditus euerterentur? quis est tam demens, qui neget istis debuisse per iussa imperialia subueniri, ut de tanto eruerentur malo. dum illi. quos timebant, timere coguntur et eodem timore aut etiam ipsi corriguntur aut certe, cum se correctos esse confingunt! correctis parcunt, a quibus antea timebantur?

### English translation (Claude)

Hence great mercy is shown to them when, by these laws of the emperors, they are first snatched, unwilling, from that sect where they learned these evils through the doctrines of lying demons, so that afterward in the Catholic Church they may be healed by growing accustomed to good precepts and ways. For many of them, whose godly fervor of faith and love we now admire in the unity of Christ, give thanks to God with great joy that they are free of that error in which they thought those evils good; thanks which they would not now give willingly, had they not first, even unwillingly, left that wicked society. What shall we say of those who confess to us daily that they had long wanted to be Catholics, but lived among people among whom, through the weakness of fear, they could not be what they wanted, where, if they said one word for the Catholic Church, both they and their houses would be utterly destroyed? Who is so mad as to deny that help ought to have been given them by imperial decrees, so that they might be rescued from so great an evil, while those whom they feared are forced to fear, and by that same fear are either themselves corrected, or at least, while they pretend to be corrected, spare those who are corrected, by whom they were formerly feared?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 4:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 1 Tim 4:1 (“doctrines of demons”). The last clause is awkward in the Latin; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.13 (CSEL 57:12–13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-13).

## Letter 185.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-14
- Source: CSEL 57:13
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Fear that a few Donatists will kill themselves must not keep the many from being saved; in most places peace has come without such deaths.

### Latin text

Si autem se ipsos occidere uoluerint, ne illi, qui liberandi sunt, liberentur, et eo modo liberantium terrere pietatem, ut, dum timetur, ne quidam perditi pereant, non eruantur perditioni, qui uel iam nolebant perire uel coherciti poterant non perire, quid hic agit caritas Christiana, praesertim cum illi, qui suas mortes uoluntarias et furiosas minantur, in populorum liberandorum comparatione perpauci sint? quid agit ergo fraterna dilectio? utrum, dum paucis transitorios ignes metuit caminorum. dimittit omnes aeternis ignibus gehennarum et tam multos uel iam uolentes uel postea non ualentes per catholicam pacem ad uitam uenire perpetuam relinquit in interitum sempiternum cauendo, ne quidam uoluntario moriantur interitu, qui uiuunt ad impedimentum salutis aliorum, quos non permittunt secundum Christi doctrinam uiuere, ut eos doceant quocumque tempore secundum consuetudinem doctrinae diabolicae ad eas. quae in illis modo timentur, mortes uoluntarias festinare? an potius conseruat. quos potest, etsi sponte pereant. quos conseruare non potest? ut enim omnes uiuant, ardenter exoptat: sed ne omnes pereant, plus laborat. gratias autem domino, quod et apud nos non quidem in omnibus sed ualde in pluribus locis et per alias Africae partes sine ullis istorum insanorum mortibus pax catholica currit et cucurrit. ibi autem illa funesta contingunt, ubi est tam furiosum et inutile hominum genus, qui et aliis temporibus eadem facere consuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But if they choose to kill themselves so that those who are to be freed may not be freed, and in this way to frighten the piety of those who free them, so that, while it is feared that certain lost men may perish, those may not be rescued from perdition who either already did not wish to perish or, if restrained, could avoid perishing: what does Christian love do here, especially since those who threaten their voluntary and frenzied deaths are very few in comparison with the peoples to be freed? What then does brotherly love do? Does it, while fearing for a few the passing fires of furnaces, abandon all to the eternal fires of hell, and leave so many, who either already wish or afterward would not be able to come to eternal life through Catholic peace, to everlasting destruction, by taking care that certain men do not die a voluntary death, men who live to hinder the salvation of others, whom they do not allow to live according to Christ's teaching, so that they may teach them, at any time, according to the custom of diabolical doctrine, to hasten to those voluntary deaths which are now feared in them? Or does it rather save those it can, even if those it cannot save perish of their own accord? For it ardently desires that all may live, but labors more that all may not perish. Thanks be to the Lord that among us, not indeed in all but in very many places, and through other parts of Africa, Catholic peace runs and has run without any deaths of these madmen. Those deadly things happen where there is a kind of people so frenzied and useless that they used to do the same things at other times too.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.14 (CSEL 57:13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-14).

## Letter 185.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-15
- Source: CSEL 57:13–15
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Before the laws, Donatist bands (Circumcellions) terrorized masters, creditors, and officials and killed themselves at will.

### Latin text

Et prius quidem quam istae leges a catholicis imperatoribus mitterentur, pacis atque unitatis Christi paulatim doctrina crescebat et in eam quisque, sicut discebat et nolebat et poterat, ex ipsa parte transibat, cum tamen apud illos perditorum hominum dementissimi greges in diuersis causis quietem innocentium perturbabant. quis non dominus seruum suum timere compulsus est, si ad illorum patrocinium confugisset? quis euersori minari saltem audebat aut auctori? quis consumptorem apothecarium, quis quemlibet poterat exigere debitorem auxilium eorum defensionemque poscentem? timore fustium et incendiorum mortisque praesentis pessimorum seruorum. ut liberi abscederent, tabulae frangebantur. extorta debitoribus chirographa reddebantur. quicumque dura illorum uerba contempserant, durioribus uerberibus. quod iubebant, facere cogebantur. innocentium, qui eos offenderant. domus aut deponebantur ad solum aut ignibus cremabantur. quidam patres familias honesto loco nati et generoso cultu educati uix uiui post eorum caedes ablati sunt uel iuncti ad molam et eam in gyrum ducere tamquam iumenta contemptibilia uerbere adacti sunt. quod enim de legibus auxilium a ciuilibus potestatibus aduersus eos aliquid ualuit? quis in praesentia eorum officialis anhelauit? quis, quod illi noluissent. exactor exegit? quis eos, qui eorum caedibus extincti sunt, uindicare temptauit, nisi quod propria de illis poenas poscebat insania. cum alii prouocandis in se gladiis hominum, quos, ut ab eis ferirentur, morte terrebant. alii per uaria praecipitia, alii per aquas. alii per ignes se in mortes uoluntarias usquequaque mittebant et animas ferales a se sibi inlatis suppliciis proiciebant?

### English translation (Claude)

Before these laws were sent by the Catholic emperors, the teaching of the peace and unity of Christ was gradually growing, and each person, as he learned and was willing and able, crossed over to it from that party; yet among them the most insane bands of lost men were disturbing the peace of the innocent in various matters. What master was not compelled to fear his own slave, if the slave had fled to their protection? Who dared even to threaten a destroyer of property or the instigator? Who could demand payment from a wasteful steward, or from any debtor whatever, who asked for their help and defense? For fear of clubs and fires and immediate death, the records of the worst slaves were broken so that they might go free; bonds extorted from creditors were returned to debtors. Whoever had despised their harsh words was forced by harsher blows to do what they ordered. The houses of innocent people who had offended them were either razed to the ground or burned. Certain heads of families, born of honorable rank and brought up with a gentleman's education, were carried away barely alive after their beatings, or were tied to a millstone and forced by blows to turn it round like contemptible beasts of burden. For what help from the laws by the civil authorities availed anything against them? What official dared so much as breathe in their presence? What tax collector exacted what they did not wish? Who tried to avenge those killed by their violence, except that their own madness exacted punishment on them, when some, by provoking against themselves the swords of men whom they terrified with death so as to be struck by them, others over various precipices, others into water, others into fire, threw themselves everywhere into voluntary deaths and cast out their savage souls by punishments they inflicted on themselves?

### Translation notes

- “Bonds extorted from creditors were returned to debtors”: the Latin says the bonds were extorted and returned to the debtors; translated by sense. The Circumcellions are meant.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.15 (CSEL 57:13–15; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-15).

## Letter 185.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-16
- Source: CSEL 57:15
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Many Donatists who disapproved of violence were shown the inconsistency of their schism, but most feared to cross over.

### Latin text

Horrebant ista plurimi in ipsa superstitione haeretica constituti et, cum innocentiae suae sufficere arbitrarentur, quod sibi talia displicerent, dicebatur eis a catholicis: si innocentiam uestram mala ista non polluunt, quo modo dicitis orbem Christianum uel falsis uel certe ignotis Caeciliani peccatis esse pollutum? quo modo uos nefario scelere ab unitate catholica tamquam ab area dominica separatis, quae usque ad tempus uentilationis necesse est ut habeat et frumentum in horreo recondendum et paleam ignibus consumendam? atque ita quibusdam ratio reddebatur. ut aliqui ad unitatem catholicam etiam inimicitias perditorum parati sustinere transirent; sed plures, quamuis id uellent, eos tamen homines, quibus tanta fuerat licentia saeuiendi, inimicos facere non audebant; nonnulli quippe illos, cum ad nos transissent, crudelissimos passi sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Very many of those who were in that heretical superstition shuddered at these things, and when they thought it enough for their innocence that such things displeased them, the Catholics said to them: “If these evils do not pollute your innocence, how can you say that the Christian world is polluted by the sins of Caecilian, which are either false or at any rate unknown? How can you separate yourselves by a wicked crime from Catholic unity as from the Lord's threshing floor, which until the time of winnowing must have both the wheat to be stored in the barn and the chaff to be burned with fire?” And so a reason was given to some, so that a number crossed over to Catholic unity, ready to bear even the enmity of the lost; but more, though they wished it, did not dare to make enemies of men who had such license to rage; and some indeed suffered most cruel treatment from them when they had crossed over to us.

### Scripture references

- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Matt 3:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.16 (CSEL 57:15; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-16).

## Letter 185.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-17
- Source: CSEL 57:15–16
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' readmission of the Maximianist schismatics, with their baptism, exposed their inconsistency and led many to return.

### Latin text

Accidit etiam, ut apud Carthaginem quendam diaconum suum nomine Maximianum contra episcopum suum superbientem quidam episcoporum eiusdem partis facto schismate et in plebe Carthaginis diuisa parte Donati ordinarent episcopum contra episcopum. quod cum eorum pluribus displiceret, eundem Maximianum cum aliis duodecim, qui eius ordinationi praesentes adfuerunt, damnauerunt, ceteris autem ad eandem societatem schismatis pertinentibus die constituto facultatem redeundi dederunt. sed postea ex ipsis duodecim quosdam et ex illis, quibus dilatio data fuerat, post diem positum redeuntes propter pacem suam in suis honoribus susceperunt et, quoscumque extra ipsorum communionem damnati baptizauerant. i non ausi sunt, coepit hoc eorum factum contra illos pro catholica multum ualere, ut ora eorum penitus clauderentur. quae res cum, sicut oportebat. ad sanandos ab schismate animos hominum spargeretur instantius et, quaqua uersum poterat, catholicorum sermonibus ac disputationibus monstraretur eos pro pace Donati et damnatos suos in honorem integrum suscepisse et baptismum, quem damnati uel etiam dilati foris ab ecclesia eorum dederant, non ausos fuisse rescindere et orbi terrarum contra pacem Christi contaminationem nescio quorum obicere peccatorum et euacuare baptismum in illis quoque ecclesiis datum, unde in Africam uenit ipsum euangelium, plurimi confundebantur et manifestae ueritati erubescentes corrigebantur solito crebrius et multo magis, ubicumque ab eorum saeuitia respirabat aliquanta libertas.

### English translation (Claude)

It also happened at Carthage that some of the bishops of that same party created a schism and ordained a deacon of theirs named Maximian, who was proud against his own bishop, as bishop against bishop, dividing the party of Donatus among the people of Carthage. Since this displeased most of them, they condemned this Maximian along with twelve others who were present at his ordination, but gave the rest belonging to that same schismatic society the opportunity to return by a fixed day. But afterward, for the sake of their own peace, they received back in their offices some of the twelve and some of those who had been granted a delay, who returned after the appointed day; and they did not dare [to rebaptize] those whom the condemned men had baptized outside their communion. This action of theirs began to be of great value for the Catholic Church against them, so that their mouths were completely shut. When this was spread abroad more urgently, as was right, for healing people's minds from schism, and was shown wherever possible in Catholic sermons and discussions that, for the peace of Donatus, they had received even their condemned men in full honor, and had not dared to annul the baptism which the condemned, or even those merely granted delay, had given outside their church, while they charged the whole world with the contamination of the sins of some unknown persons, against the peace of Christ, and emptied the baptism given even in those churches from which the Gospel itself came to Africa: very many were confounded and, blushing at the manifest truth, were corrected more often than usual, and much more so wherever any freedom to breathe from their cruelty existed.

### Translation notes

- The digital text is defective at “baptizauerant. i non ausi sunt”; “[to rebaptize]” is supplied from the sense, as 185.17 goes on to say they did not dare to annul that baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.17 (CSEL 57:15–16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-17).

## Letter 185.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-18
- Source: CSEL 57:16–17
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Donatist violence left bishops a choice between silence and persecution, so appealing to Christian emperors was necessary.

### Latin text

Tum uero illi sic exarserunt et tantis sunt odiorum stimulis incitati, ut contra eorum insidias atque uiolentias et apertissima latrocinia uix ullae nostrae communionis ecclesiae possent esse securae, uix ulla uia. tuta, qua iter agerent. quicumque aduersus eorum rabiem pacem catholicam praedicarent eorumque dementiam perspicua ueritate conuincerent. usque adeo prorsus non solum laicis uel quibuslibet clericis sed ipsis quoque episcopis catholicis quodam modo proponebatur dura condicio; aut enim tacenda erat ueritas aut eorum immanitas perferenda. sed si ueritas taceretur, non solum nemo fuerat eius silentio liberandus sed multi etiam illorum seductione perdendi; si autem ueritatis praedicatione furor eorum ad saeuiendum prouocaretur, aliquibus liberatis nostrisque firmatis rursus a sequenda ueritate formido impediret infirmos. cum igitur his angustiis affligeretur ecclesia, quisquis existimat omnia potius sustinenda quam, dei auxilium ut per Christianos imperatores ferretur, fuisse poscendum, parum adtendit non bonam de hac neglegentia reddi potuisse rationem.

### English translation (Claude)

Then indeed they so blazed up and were spurred on by such goads of hatred that hardly any churches of our communion could be safe from their ambushes, violence, and open robberies, and hardly any road was safe for travel for those who preached Catholic peace against their rage and refuted their madness with clear truth. A hard choice was thus put, so to speak, not only before laymen or any clerics, but even before the Catholic bishops themselves: either the truth had to be kept silent, or their savagery endured. But if the truth were kept silent, not only would no one be freed by its silence, but many would be lost by their seduction; and if by preaching the truth their fury was provoked to rage, though some were freed and our people strengthened, fear would again keep the weak from following the truth. So, when the church was afflicted by these straits, whoever thinks that everything should have been endured rather than asking that God's help be brought through Christian emperors pays too little attention to the fact that no good account could have been given of such negligence.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.18 (CSEL 57:16–17; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-18).

## Letter 185.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-19
- Source: CSEL 57:17–18
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In the apostles' time kings opposed Christ; now, as Psalm 2 foretold, kings serve the Lord as kings by just laws, like Hezekiah, Josiah, and Darius.

### Latin text

Quod enim dicunt, qui contra suas impietates leges iustas institui nolunt, non petisse a regibus terrae apostolos talia, non considerant aliud fuisse tunc tempus et omnia suis temporibus agi. quis enim tunc in Christum crediderat imperator, qui ei pro pietate contra impietatem leges ferendo seruiret. quando adhuc illud propheticum complebatur: Quare fremuerunt gentes et populi meditati sunt inania? adstiterunt reges terrae et principes conuenerunt in unum aduersus dominum et aduersus Christum eius. nondum autem agebatur, quod paulo post in eodem psalmo dicitur: Et nunc, reges, intellegite; erudimini, qui iudicatis terram; seruite domino in timore et exultate ei cum tremore. quo modo ergo reges domino seruiunt in timore nisi ea, quae contra iussa domini fiunt. religiosa seueritate prohibendo atque plectendo? aliter enim seruit, quia homo est, aliter, quia etiam rex est; quia homo est enim, seruit uiuendo fideliter, quia uero etiam rex est, seruit leges iusta praecipientes et contraria prohibentes conuenienti uigore sanciendo, sicut seruiuit Ezechias lucos et templa idolorum et illa excelsa, quae contra dei praecepta fuerant constructa, destruendo, sicut seruiuit Iosias talia et ipse faciendo, sicut seruiuit rex Nineuitarum uniuersam ciuitatem ad placandum dominum compellendo. sicut seruiuit Darius idolum frangendum in potestatem Daniheli dando et inimicos eius leonibus ingerendo, sicut seruiuit Nabuchodonosor, de quo iam diximus, omnes in regno suo positos a blasphemando deo lege terribili prohibendo. in hoc ergo seruiunt domino reges, in quantum sunt reges, cum ea faciunt ad seruiendum illi, quae non possunt facere nisi reges.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what those say who do not want just laws to be made against their impieties, that the apostles did not ask such things from the kings of the earth, they do not consider that the time was different then, and that everything is done in its own time. For what emperor had then believed in Christ, to serve him by making laws for piety against impiety, when that prophecy was still being fulfilled: “Why have the nations raged, and the peoples devised vain things? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ”? What is said a little later in the same psalm was not yet being done: “And now, kings, understand; be instructed, you who judge the earth; serve the Lord in fear, and rejoice in him with trembling.” How then do kings serve the Lord in fear, except by forbidding and punishing with religious severity what is done against the Lord's commands? For a king serves in one way because he is a man, in another because he is also a king. Because he is a man, he serves by living faithfully; but because he is also a king, he serves by enacting with fitting vigor laws that command what is just and forbid the contrary: as Hezekiah served by destroying the groves and temples of idols and those high places which had been built against God's commands; as Josiah served by doing the same things himself; as the king of the Ninevites served by compelling the whole city to appease the Lord; as Darius served by giving the idol into Daniel's power to be broken and throwing his enemies to the lions; as Nebuchadnezzar served, of whom we have already spoken, by forbidding by a terrible law all in his kingdom to blaspheme God. In this, then, kings serve the Lord as kings, when they do for his service what only kings can do.

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:1–2: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 2:10–11: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Kgs 18:4: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Kgs 23:4–20: allusion, high confidence
- Jonah 3:6–9: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 6:24: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 3:29: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Bel 22 (Bel and the Dragon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Ps 2:1–2, 10–11; 2 Kgs 18:4; 2 Kgs 23:4–20; Jonah 3:6–9; Dan 6:24; Dan 3:29. Darius giving the idol to Daniel follows Bel and the Dragon (Greek Daniel 14), outside the 66 books.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.19 (CSEL 57:17–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-19).

## Letter 185.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-20
- Source: CSEL 57:18–19
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Now that kings worship Christ, they may not be indifferent to sacrilege any more than to adultery.

### Latin text

Cum itaque nondum reges domino seruirent temporibus apostolorum, sed adhuc meditarentur inania aduersus eum et aduersus Christum eius, ut prophetarum praedicta omnia complerentur, non utique tunc possent impietates legibus prohibere. sed potius exercere. sic enim ordo temporum uoluebatur. ut et Iudaei occiderent praedicatores Christi putantes se officium deo facere, sicut praedixerat Christus. et gentes fremerent aduersus Christianos et omnes patientia martyrum uinceret. postea uero quam coepit impleri. quod scriptum est: Et adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae, omnes gentes seruient illi, quis mente sobrius regibus dicat: Nolite curare in regno uestro, a quo teneatur uel oppugnetur ecclesia domini uestri; non ad uos pertineat. quis uelit esse siue religiosus siue sacrilegus, quibus dici non potest: Non ad uos pertineat, in regno uestro quis uelit pudicus esse. quis inpudicus? cur enim, cum datum sit diuinitus homini liberum arbitrium, adulteria legibus puniantur et sacrilegia permittantur? an fidem non seruare leuius est animam deo quam feminam uiro? aut si ea, quae non contemptu sed ignorantia religionis committuntur, mitius uindicanda, numquid ideo neglegenda sunt?

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, in the times of the apostles kings did not yet serve the Lord, but were still devising vain things against him and against his Christ, so that all the predictions of the prophets might be fulfilled, they certainly could not then forbid impieties by laws, but rather practiced them. For the order of the times was so unrolling that the Jews killed the preachers of Christ, thinking they were doing God a service, as Christ had foretold, and the nations raged against the Christians, and the patience of the martyrs overcame all. But after what is written began to be fulfilled, “And all the kings of the earth shall worship him; all nations shall serve him,” what sober-minded person would say to kings: “Do not care in your kingdom by whom the church of your Lord is held or attacked; let it not concern you who wishes to be religious or sacrilegious in your kingdom”? It cannot be said to them, “Let it not concern you who in your kingdom wishes to be chaste or unchaste.” For why, since free choice has been given by God to man, should adulteries be punished by laws and sacrileges permitted? Or is it a lighter thing for the soul not to keep faith with God than for a woman not to keep it with her husband? Or, if offenses committed not from contempt but from ignorance of religion should be punished more mildly, are they therefore to be neglected?

### Scripture references

- Ps 2:1–2: allusion, high confidence
- John 16:2: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Ps 2:1–2; John 16:2; Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX/Vulgate). The reference to the Jews follows John 16:2; translated as written. The argument is reconstructed by sense where the Latin punctuation is unclear.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.20 (CSEL 57:18–19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-20).

## Letter 185.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-21
- Source: CSEL 57:19–20
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Teaching is better than compulsion, but more people are corrected by fear; Scripture approves discipline for those words do not reach.

### Latin text

Melius esse quidem quis dubitauerit ad deum colendum doctrina homines duci quam poenae timore uel dolore compelli? sed non, quia isti meliores sunt, ideo illi. qui tales non sunt, neglegendi sunt. multis enim profuit, quod experimentis probauimus et probamus, prius timore uel dolore cogi, ut postea possint doceri aut, quod iam uerbis didicerant, opere sectari. proponunt nobis quidam sententiam cuiusdam saecularis auctoris, qui dixit: Pudore et liberalitate liberos retinere satius esse credo quam metu. hoc quidem uerum est; sed sicut meliores sunt, quos dirigit amor, ita plures sunt, quos corrigit timor. nam ut de ipso auctore istis respondeatur, apud illum etiam legunt: Tu nisi malo coactus recte facere nescis. porro autem scriptura diuina et propter illos meliores dixit: Timor non est in caritate, sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem, et propter hos inferiores, qui plures sunt. ait: Verbis non emendabitur seruus durus: si enim et intellexerit, non oboediet. cum dixit eum uerbis non emendari, non eum iussit deseri. sed tacite admonuit, unde debeat emendari; alioquin non diceret: Verbis non emendabitur, sed tantum modo diceret non emendabitur. alio quippe loco dicit non solum seruum sed etiam filium indisciplinatum plagis esse cohercendum et magno fructu: nam: Tu quidem, inquit, percutis eum uirga. animam uero eius liberabis a morte, et alibi dicit: Qui parcit baculo suo, odit filium suum. da enim. qui fide ueroque intellectu totis animae suae uiribus dicat: Sitiuit anima mea ad deum uiuum; quando ueniam et apparebo ante faciem dei? et huic tali non solum temporalium poenarum uel imperialium legum sed nec gehennarum timor est necessarius, cui tam desiderabile bonum est adhaerere deo, ut non solum ab illa felicitate alienari tamquam magnum supplicium perhorrescat, uerum etiam differri moleste ferat. sed tamen antequam dicant boni filii: Concupiscentiam habemus dissolui et esse cum Christo. multi prius tamquam mali serui et quodam modo inprobi fugitiui ad dominum suum temporalium flagellorum uerbere reuocantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Who would doubt that it is better for people to be led to worship God by teaching than to be compelled by fear of punishment or by pain? But it does not follow that, because the former are better, the latter, who are not such, are to be neglected. For it has benefited many, as we have proved and are proving by experience, to be compelled first by fear or pain, so that afterward they could be taught, or follow in deed what they had already learned in words. Some put before us the saying of a certain secular author, who said, “I believe it better to hold children by a sense of shame and by generosity than by fear.” This is indeed true; but just as those whom love directs are better, so those whom fear corrects are more numerous. For, to answer them from that same author, they also read in him: “You do not know how to do right unless compelled by trouble.” Moreover, divine Scripture said for the sake of those better ones, “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear”; and for the sake of these lower ones, who are more numerous, it says, “A hard slave will not be corrected by words; for even if he understands, he will not obey.” When it said that he is not corrected by words, it did not order him to be abandoned, but tacitly suggested how he should be corrected; otherwise it would not say, “He will not be corrected by words,” but only, “He will not be corrected.” For in another place it says that not only a slave but also an undisciplined son is to be restrained with blows, and with great profit: for “you strike him with the rod,” it says, “but you will deliver his soul from death”; and elsewhere it says, “Whoever spares his rod hates his son.” Give me someone who with faith and true understanding can say with all the strength of his soul, “My soul has thirsted for the living God; when shall I come and appear before the face of God?” For such a person not only the fear of temporal punishments or of imperial laws is unnecessary, but even the fear of hell, since to cling to God is so desirable a good to him that he not only dreads being estranged from that happiness as a great punishment, but bears even its delay with distress. But before the good sons say, “We have the desire to depart and be with Christ,” many are first called back to their Lord, like bad slaves and in a way wicked runaways, by the lash of temporal scourges.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:18: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 29:19: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 23:14: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 13:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 42:2 (41:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:23: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Ad. 57–58 (Terence): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The “secular author” is Terence, Adelphoe 57–58; the second line (“Tu nisi malo coactus recte facere nescis”) is also attributed to Terence, but its place has not been located here.
- Quotations: 1 John 4:18; Prov 29:19; Prov 23:14; Prov 13:24; Ps 42:2 (41:3 LXX/Vulgate); Phil 1:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.21 (CSEL 57:19–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-21).

## Letter 185.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-22
- Source: CSEL 57:20–21
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ himself compelled Paul by striking him blind before teaching him, and Paul labored more than all.

### Latin text

Quis enim nos potest amplius amare quam Christus, qui animam suam posuit pro ouibus suis? et tamen cum Petrum et alios apostolos solo uerbo uocasset. Paulum. prius Saulum. ecclesiae suae postea magnum aedificatorem sed horrendum antea uastatorem, non sola uoce compescuit. uerum etiam potestate prostrauit atque, ut infidelitatis tenebris saeuientem ad desiderandum lumen cordis urgeret, prius corporis caecitate percussit. si poena illa non esset, non ab ea postmodum sanaretur et, quando apertis oculis nihil uidebat, si eos saluos haberet, non ad inpositionem manus Ananiae, ut eorum aperiretur obtutus, tamquam squamas, quibus clausus fuerat, inde cecidisse scriptura narraret. ubi est, quod isti clamare consuerunt: Liberum est credere uel non credere: cui uim Christus intulit? quem coegit? ecce habent apostolum Paulum: agnoscant in eo prius cogentem Christum et postea docentem, prius ferientem et postea consolantem. mirum est autem, quo modo ille, qui poena corporis ad euangelium coactus intrauit, plus illis omnibus, qui solo uerbo uocati sunt, in euangelio laborauit et, quem maior timor compulit ad caritatem, eius perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem.

### English translation (Claude)

For who can love us more than Christ, who laid down his life for his sheep? And yet, though he had called Peter and the other apostles by word alone, Paul, formerly Saul, afterward the great builder of his church but before that its dreadful ravager, he did not restrain by voice alone, but even struck down by his power; and to drive him, raging in the darkness of unbelief, to desire the light of the heart, he first struck him with blindness of body. If that had not been a punishment, he would not afterward have been healed of it; and if, when he saw nothing with his eyes open, his eyes had been sound, Scripture would not tell how, at the laying on of Ananias's hand, so that his sight might be opened, something like scales, by which it had been closed, fell from them. Where is what these men are accustomed to cry out: “One is free to believe or not believe. On whom did Christ use force? Whom did he compel?” See, they have the apostle Paul: let them recognize in him Christ first compelling and afterward teaching, first striking and afterward consoling. And it is wonderful how he who entered the Gospel compelled by bodily punishment labored more in the Gospel than all those who were called by word alone; and he whom a greater fear drove to love, his perfect love casts out fear.

### Scripture references

- John 10:11: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:3–18: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:10: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: John 10:11; Acts 9:3–18; 1 Cor 15:10; 1 John 4:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.22 (CSEL 57:20–21; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-22).

## Letter 185.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-23
- Source: CSEL 57:21–22
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The church rightly compels her lost sons to return, as shepherds recover straying sheep; their baptism, like a royal mark, is recognized, not repeated.

### Latin text

Cur ergo non cogeret ecclesia perditos filios, ut redirent, si perditi filii coegerunt alios, ut perirent? quamuis etiam illos. quos non coegerunt, sed tantum modo seduxerunt, si per terribiles sed salubres leges in eius gremium reuocentur, blandius pia mater amplectitur et de illis multo amplius quam de his. quos numquam perdiderat, gratulatur. an non pertinet ad diligentiam pastoralem etiam illas oues, quae non uiolenter ereptae sed blande leniterque seductae a grege aberrauerint et ab alienis coeperint possideri, inuentas ad ouile dominicum, si resistere uoluerint, flagellorum terroribus uel etiam doloribus reuocare, praesertim quoniam, si apud fugitiuos et praedones seruos fecunditate multiplicentur, plus habet iuris, quod in eis dominicus character agnoscitur, qui in eis, quos suscipimus nec tamen rebaptizamus, minime uiolatur? sic enim error corrigendus est ouis, ut non in ea corrumpatur signaculum redemptoris. neque enim, si quisquam regio charactere a signato desertore signetur et accipiant indulgentiam atque ille redeat ad militiam. ille autem esse in militia, in qua nondum erat, incipiat. in aliquo eorum character ille rescinditur. an non potius in ambobus agnoscitur et honore debito, quoniam est regius. adprobatur? quia ergo non possunt malum esse ostendere. quo coguntur, nec ad bonum se cogi oportere contendunt. sed a Christo coactum ostendimus Paulum; imitatur itaque ecclesia in istis cogendis dominum suum, quae prius, ut neminem cogeret, expectauit, ut de fide regum atque gentium praedicatio prophetica compleretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Why then should the church not compel her lost sons to return, if the lost sons compelled others to perish? Although even those whom they did not compel, but only seduced, if they are called back into her bosom through terrible but salutary laws, the loving mother embraces more tenderly and rejoices over them much more than over those she never lost. Does it not belong to pastoral diligence, when sheep have strayed from the flock, not violently snatched away but gently and softly seduced, and have begun to be possessed by strangers, to call them back, when found, to the Lord's fold, if they choose to resist, by the terrors or even the pains of scourges? Especially since, if they multiply by breeding among fugitive and robber slaves, there is the greater claim because the Lord's mark is recognized in them, which is in no way violated in those whom we receive without rebaptizing. For the error of the sheep must be corrected in such a way that the seal of the Redeemer is not destroyed in it. For if someone is marked with the royal mark by a deserter who bears that mark, and both receive pardon, and the one returns to service while the other begins to be in the service in which he was not yet, is that mark erased in either of them? Is it not rather recognized in both and approved with due honor, since it is the king's? Since, then, they cannot show that what they are compelled to is evil, they argue that they ought not to be compelled to good. But we have shown that Paul was compelled by Christ; so the church, in compelling these men, imitates her Lord, she who first waited before compelling anyone, so that the prophecy about the faith of kings and nations might be fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Luke 15:7: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The “Lord's mark” is baptism, which Catholics did not repeat on Donatists. Augustine's justification of compulsion is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.23 (CSEL 57:21–22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-23).

## Letter 185.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-24
- Source: CSEL 57:22–23
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The parable's two stages, “bring in” then “compel,” show that compulsion belongs to the church's later age; the banquet is the unity of Christ's body.

### Latin text

Etiam hinc enim non absurde intellegitur apostolica illa sententia, ubi Paulus beatus dicit: Parati ulcisci omnem inoboedientiam. cum completa fuerit prior oboedientia uestra. unde et ipse dominus ad magnam cenam suam prius conuiuas adduci iubet, postea cogi; nam cum serui respondissent: Domine, factum est, quod iussisti. et adhuc locus est, Exite, inquit, in uias et saepes et, quoscumque inueneritis, cogite intrare. in illis ergo, qui leniter primo adducti sunt, completa est prior oboedientia, in istis autem, qui coguntur, inoboedientia cohercetur: nam quid est cogite intrare, cum primo dictum esset adducite et responsum esset factum est. quod iussisti. et adhuc est locus? si miraculorum terroribus cogendos uoluisset intellegi, magis ad eos. qui prius uocati sunt, diuina miracula multa facta sunt, maxime ad Iudaeos, de quibus dictum est: Iudaei signa petunt. in ipsis quoque gentibus talia temporibus apostolorum miracula euangelium commendarunt, ut, si talibus cogi iuberentur, priores, ut dixi, potius conuiuae coacti esse merito crederentur. quapropter si potestate, quam per religionem ac fidem regum tempore, quo debuit, diuino munere accepit ecclesia, hi, qui inueniuntur in uiis et in saepibus, id est in haeresibus et schismatibus, coguntur intrare, non, quia coguntur, reprehendant, sed, quo cogantur, adtendant. conuiuium domini unitas est corporis Christi non solum in sacramento altaris sed etiam in uinculo pacis. de ipsis sane possumus uerissime dicere, quod neminem cogant ad bonum; quoscumque enim cogunt, non cogunt nisi ad malum.

### English translation (Claude)

From this too that apostolic saying is understood not absurdly, where blessed Paul says, “Ready to punish all disobedience, when your obedience is first complete.” Hence the Lord himself orders the guests to be brought to his great supper first, and afterward compelled; for when the servants had answered, “Lord, what you ordered has been done, and there is still room,” he said, “Go out into the roads and hedges, and whomever you find, compel them to come in.” In those, then, who were first brought gently, the former obedience was completed; but in these who are compelled, disobedience is restrained. For what does “compel them to come in” mean, when it had first been said, “Bring them in,” and the answer was, “What you ordered has been done, and there is still room”? If he had wished it to be understood that they were to be compelled by the terrors of miracles, many more divine miracles were done for those who were called first, especially for the Jews, of whom it was said, “The Jews ask for signs”; and among the Gentiles too, in the times of the apostles, such miracles commended the Gospel, so that, if people were ordered to be compelled by such things, it would rather be believed, as I said, that the first guests were compelled. Therefore, if by the power which the church received by divine gift, at the proper time, through the religion and faith of kings, those found in the roads and hedges, that is, in heresies and schisms, are compelled to come in, let them not find fault because they are compelled, but consider to what they are compelled. The Lord's banquet is the unity of the body of Christ, not only in the sacrament of the altar but also in the bond of peace. Of them we can most truly say that they compel no one to good; for whomever they compel, they compel only to evil.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 10:6: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:21–23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:22: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 2 Cor 10:6; Luke 14:21–23; 1 Cor 1:22. Allusion: Eph 4:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.24 (CSEL 57:22–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-24).

## Letter 185.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-25
- Source: CSEL 57:23–25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls that he first favored only fining Donatist clergy for violence, not compelling conversion, and the council at first asked for this.

### Latin text

Verum tamen antequam istae leges, quibus ad conuiuium sanctum coguntur intrare, in Africam mitterentur, nonnullis fratribus uidebatur, in quibus et ego eram, quamuis Donatistarum rabies usque quaque saeuiret, non esse petendum ab imperatoribus, ut ipsam haeresem iuberent omnino non esse poenam constituendo eis, qui in illa esse uoluissent. sed hoc potius constituerent, ut eorum furiosas uiolentias non paterentur, qui ueritatem catholicam uel praedicarent loquendo uel legerent constituendo. quod eo modo fieri aliquatenus posse arbitrabamur, si legem piissimae memoriae Theodosii, quam generaliter in omnes haereticos promulgauit, ut, quisquis eorum episcopus uel clericus ubi libet esset inuentus. decem libris auri multaretur, expressius in Donatistas, qui se negabant haereticos, ita confirmarent, ut non omnes ea multa ferirentur. sed in quorum regionibus aliquas uiolentias a clericis uel Circumcellionibus uel populis eorum ecclesia catholica pateretur. ut scilicet post protestationem catholicorum, qui fuissent ista perpessi, iam cura ordinum ad persoluendam multam episcopi siue ministri ceteri tenerentur. ita enim existimabamus eis territis et nihil tale facere audentibus posse libere doceri et teneri catholicam ueritatem, ut ad eam cogeretur nemo. sed eam, qui uellet, sine formidine sequeretur, ne falsos et simulatores catholicos haberemus. et quamuis aliis fratribus aliud uideretur iam aetate grauioribus uel multarum ciuitatum et locorum exempla curantibus, ubi firmam et ueram catholicam uidebamus, quae tamen ibi talibus beneficiis dei constituta esset atque firmata, dum per priorum imperatorum leges ad communionem homines catholicam cogerentur, obtinuimus tamen. ut illud potius, quod dixi, ab imperatoribus peteretur. decretum est in concilio nostro, legati ad comitatum missi sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet before these laws, by which they are compelled to come in to the holy banquet, were sent to Africa, it seemed to some of the brothers, and I was one of them, that, although the madness of the Donatists was raging everywhere, we should not ask the emperors to order that the heresy itself should not exist at all, by fixing a penalty for those who chose to remain in it; but rather that they should decree that those who proclaimed Catholic truth by speaking, or established it by reading, should not suffer their frenzied violence. We thought this could be done in some measure if the emperors confirmed the law of Theodosius of most pious memory, which he promulgated generally against all heretics (that any bishop or cleric of theirs found anywhere should be fined ten pounds of gold), more expressly against the Donatists, who denied they were heretics, in such a way that not all would be struck by that fine, but those in whose regions the Catholic Church suffered any violence from their clerics or Circumcellions or people; so that, after a protest by the Catholics who had suffered these things, the bishops or other ministers would then be held liable, through the care of the officials, to pay the fine. For we thought that, if they were frightened and dared do nothing of the kind, Catholic truth could be taught and held freely, so that no one would be compelled to it, but whoever wished might follow it without fear, so that we would not have false and pretended Catholics. And although other brothers thought otherwise, men of greater age or who considered the examples of many cities and places where we saw a firm and true Catholic Church, established and strengthened there by such benefits of God, when people were compelled to Catholic communion by the laws of earlier emperors, we nevertheless prevailed, so that rather what I have said should be asked of the emperors. It was decreed in our council, and envoys were sent to the court.

### Translation notes

- The law of Theodosius I against heretics (392), fining clergy ten pounds of gold. The council is that of Carthage of 404.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.25 (CSEL 57:23–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-25).

## Letter 185.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-26
- Source: CSEL 57:25
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Violence such as the attack on Bishop Maximian of Bagai led the emperor to outlaw Donatism with fines and exile, though not death.

### Latin text

Sed dei maior misericordia, qui sciret harum legum terror et quaedam medicinalis molestia quam multorum esset prauis uel frigidis animis necessaria et illi duritiae, quae uerbis emendari non potest, sed tamen aliquantula seueritate disciplinae potest, id egit, ut legati nostri, quod susceperant, obtinere non possent. iam enim nos praeuenerant ex aliis locis quaedam episcoporum querelae grauissimae, qui mala fuerant ab ipsis multa perpessi et a suis sedibus exturbati; praecipue horrenda et incredibilis caedes Maximiani catholici episcopi ecclesiae Bagaiensis effecit, ut nostra legatio iam, quid ageret, non haberet. iam enim lex fuerat promulgata, ut tantae immanitatis haeresis Donatistarum, cui crudelius parci uidebatur, quam ipsa saeuiebat, non tantum uiolenta esse, sed omnino esse non sineretur impune non tamen supplicio capitali propter seruandam etiam circa indignos mansuetudinem Christianam sed pecuniariis damnis propositis et in episcopos uel ministros eorum exilio constituto.

### English translation (Claude)

But the greater mercy of God, who knew how necessary the terror of these laws and a certain medicinal trouble were for the perverse or cold minds of many, and for that hardness which cannot be corrected by words but can be by a little severity of discipline, brought it about that our envoys could not obtain what they had undertaken. For some very grave complaints of bishops from other places had already reached the court before us, bishops who had suffered many evils from them and had been driven from their sees; above all, the horrible and incredible attack on Maximian, Catholic bishop of the church of Bagai, made it so that our embassy no longer had anything to do. For a law had already been promulgated that the heresy of the Donatists, of such savagery that to spare it seemed more cruel than it was itself in its raging, should not be allowed not only to be violent but to exist at all with impunity; yet not with capital punishment, in order to preserve Christian gentleness even toward the unworthy, but with financial penalties set out and exile decreed against their bishops or ministers.

### Scripture references

- Prov 29:19: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- The law is Honorius's edict of unity (405).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.26 (CSEL 57:25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-8/#p-185-26).

## Letter 185.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-27
- Source: CSEL 57:25–26
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts the Donatist assault on Maximian, Catholic bishop of Bagai, who survived being beaten, stabbed, and thrown from a tower.

### Latin text

Supra dictum quippe episcopum Bagaiensem, quoniam apud ordinarium iudicem dicta inter partes sententia obtinuerat basilicam, quam illi, cum catholica esset, inuaserunt, stantem ad altare inruentes horrendo impetu et furore crudeli fustibus et cuiusce modi telis, lignis denique eiusdem altaris effractis immaniter ceciderunt; pugione etiam percusserunt in inguine, quo uulnere sanguis effluens eum exanimem redderet, nisi ei ad uitam maior eorum saeuitia profuisset. nam cum grauiter sauciatum per terram insuper traherent, exundanti uenae puluis obstrusus sanguinem abstinuit, cuius effusione ibat in mortem. deinde cum ab eis tandem relictum nostri cum psalmis auferre temptarent, illi ira ardentiore succensi eum de portantium manibus abstulerunt male mulcatis fugatisque catholicis. quos ingenti multitudine superabant et facile saeuiendo terrebant. inde in quandam turrem leuatum iam defecisse arbitrantes. cum ille adhuc uiueret, abiecerunt. sed quodam molli aggere exceptus et a quibusdam nocte transeuntibus per lucernam conspectus, agnitus atque collectus et ad religiosam domum adportatus adhibita magna cura post multos dies ab illa desperatione recreatus est. sed occisum tamen eum fama scelere Donatistarum etiam trans mare nuntiauerat: quo posteaquam uenit et uita eius inopinatissima apparuit, cicatricibus suis tam multis, tam ingentibus, tam recentibus non frustra famam mortuum se nuntiasse monstrauit.

### English translation (Claude)

For the bishop of Bagai mentioned above, because by a sentence pronounced between the parties before the ordinary judge he had recovered a basilica which they had seized although it was Catholic, they rushed upon him as he stood at the altar with a horrible onslaught and cruel fury, and beat him savagely with clubs and weapons of every kind, and finally with the timbers of the altar itself, which they had broken up. They also stabbed him with a dagger in the groin, and the blood flowing from that wound would have left him lifeless, had not their greater savagery served to save his life. For as they dragged him, gravely wounded, along the ground besides, the dust packed into the gushing vein stopped the blood, by whose outpouring he was going to his death. Then, when at last they had left him and our people tried to carry him away with psalms, they, inflamed with hotter anger, took him from the hands of those carrying him, beating and putting to flight the Catholics, whom they far outnumbered and easily terrified by their savagery. Then, thinking he had already died, though he was still alive, they lifted him up into a tower and threw him down. But he was caught by a soft heap of earth, and, seen by the light of a lamp by some people passing by at night, he was recognized, picked up, and carried to a religious house; and with great care, after many days, he was restored from that desperate state. But rumor had reported, even across the sea, that he had been killed by the crime of the Donatists; and when he afterward went there and appeared, most unexpectedly, alive, he showed by his scars, so many, so great, so fresh, that rumor had not announced his death without cause.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.27 (CSEL 57:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-27).

## Letter 185.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-28
- Source: CSEL 57:26–27
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As Paul appealed to Roman law and Caesar, so bishops rightly seek the Christian emperor's protection; hence the emperor's laws for unity.

### Latin text

Auxilium ergo petiit ab imperatore Christiano non tam sui ulciscendi causa quam tuendae ecclesiae sibi creditae. quod si praetermisisset, non eius fuisset laudanda patientia sed neglegentia merito culpanda. neque enim et apostolus Paulus t suae transitoriae consulebat sed ecclesiae dei. quando contra illos, qui eum occidere conspirauerant, consilium illorum tribuno ut proderetur, effecit; unde factum est. ut eum ad locum, quo fuerat perducendus, deduceret miles armatus, ne illorum pateretur insidias. Romanas etiam leges inplorare minime dubitauit ciuem Romanum se esse proclamans. quos tunc affligi uerberibus non licebat. itemque, ne Iudaeis eum interimere cupientibus traderetur, Caesaris poposcit auxilium, Romani quidem principis sed non Christiani. ubi satis ostendit, quid facere postea deberent Christi dispensatores, quando imperatores Christianos periclitante ecclesia reperirent. hinc ergo factum est, ut imperator religiosus et pius perlatis in notitiam suam talibus causis mallet piissimis legibus illius impietatis errorem omnino corrigere et eos, qui contra Christum Christi signa portarent, ad unitatem catholicam terrendo et cohercendo redigere quam saeuiendi tantum modo auferre licentiam et errandi ac pereundi relinquere.

### English translation (Claude)

So he sought help from the Christian emperor, not so much to avenge himself as to protect the church entrusted to him. Had he neglected this, his patience would not have deserved praise; rather his negligence would rightly have deserved blame. For the apostle Paul too was not taking thought for his own passing life but for the church of God, when he arranged that the plan of those who had conspired to kill him be made known to the tribune; as a result, an armed soldiery escorted him to the place where he was to be taken, so that he might not suffer their ambush. Nor did he hesitate at all to invoke the Roman laws, proclaiming himself a Roman citizen, whom it was then unlawful to afflict with scourging; and likewise, so as not to be handed over to the Jews who wanted to kill him, he asked for the help of Caesar, a Roman emperor, indeed, but not a Christian. By this he showed clearly enough what the stewards of Christ ought to do afterward, when they found the emperors Christian while the church was in danger. Hence it came about that a religious and pious emperor, when such cases were brought to his knowledge, preferred to correct the error of that impiety entirely by most pious laws, and to bring those who carried the standards of Christ against Christ into Catholic unity by frightening and restraining them, rather than merely to take away their license to rage and leave them license to err and perish.

### Scripture references

- Acts 23:12–24: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 22:25: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 25:11: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text has a defect at “Paulus t suae transitoriae”; translated by sense (“his own passing life”). Allusions: Acts 23:12–24; Acts 22:25; Acts 25:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.28 (CSEL 57:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-28).

## Letter 185.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-29
- Source: CSEL 57:27–28
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: When the laws arrived, many Donatists came over, some from fear lifted, others on reflection or following others.

### Latin text

Iam uero cum ipsae leges uenissent in Africam, praecipue illi. qui quaerebant occasionem aut saeuitiam furentium metuebant aut suos uerecundabantur offendere, ad ecclesiam continuo transierunt. multi etiam. qui sola illic a parentibus tradita consuetudine tenebantur, qualem uero causam ipsa haeresis haberet numquam antea cogitauerant, numquam quaerere et considerare uoluerant, mox. ubi coeperunt aduertere et nihil in ea dignum inuenire, propter quod tanta damna paterentur. sine ulla difficultate catholici facti sunt; docuit enim eos sollicitudo, quos neglegentes securitas fecerat. istorum autem omnium praecedentium auctoritatem et persuasionem secuti sunt multi, qui minus idonei erant per se ipsos intellegere, quid distaret inter Donatistarum errorem et catholicam ueritatem.

### English translation (Claude)

Now when these laws came to Africa, those above all who were looking for an opportunity, or feared the savagery of the raging men, or were ashamed to offend their own people, immediately crossed over to the church. Many too who were held there only by custom handed down from their parents, but had never before thought what kind of case the heresy itself had, and had never wished to inquire and consider it, as soon as they began to pay attention and found nothing in it worth suffering such great losses for, became Catholics without any difficulty; for anxiety taught those whom security had made careless. And many followed the authority and persuasion of all these who went before them, being less able to understand by themselves what the difference was between the error of the Donatists and Catholic truth.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.29 (CSEL 57:27–28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-29).

## Letter 185.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-30
- Source: CSEL 57:28
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Most remaining Donatists were won over after the Conference of Carthage, but in some places Catholics still suffer maiming, murder, and arson.

### Latin text

Ita cum magna agmina populorum uera mater in sinum gaudens reciperet, remanserunt turbae durae et in illa peste infelici animositate sistentes. ex his quoque plurimi simulando communicauerunt, alii paucitate latuerunt. sed illi, qui simulabant, paulatim adsuescendo et praedicationem ueritatis audiendo maxime post conlationem et disputationem, quae inter nos et episcopos eorum apud Carthaginem fuit, ex magna parte correcti sunt. in quibusdam uero locis, ubi pertinacior et inpacatior praeualuit multitudo, cui resistere non poterant pauciores, quorum erat melior de communione sententia, aut turbae auctoritati paucorum potentiorum subditae in malam partem obtemperarunt, aliquanto diutius laboratum est. ex his sunt, in quibus adhuc laboratur, in quo labore multa catholici et maxime episcopi et clerici horrenda et dura perpessi sunt, quae commemorare longum est, quando quorundam et oculi extincti sunt et cuiusdam episcopi manus et lingua praecisa est, nonnulli etiam trucidati sunt. taceo crudelissimas caedes et domorum depraedationes per nocturnas adgressiones et incendia non solum priuatorum habitaculorum uerum etiam ecclesiarum; in quas flammas non defuerunt qui et codices dominicos mitterent

### English translation (Claude)

So, while the true mother joyfully received great columns of peoples into her bosom, hard crowds remained, persisting in that plague with unhappy animosity. Of these too very many communicated by pretense, while others escaped notice by their small numbers. But those who pretended, by gradually growing used to it and hearing the preaching of the truth, especially after the conference and debate held between us and their bishops at Carthage, were for the most part corrected. In certain places, however, where a more obstinate and unpeaceful multitude prevailed, which the fewer people who held a better view of communion could not resist, or where crowds subject to the authority of a few powerful men obeyed them for the worse, the labor took somewhat longer. Among these are places where the labor still goes on, and in that labor the Catholics, especially bishops and clergy, have suffered many horrible and hard things, which it would take long to recount: some have had their eyes put out, a certain bishop had his hand and tongue cut off, some were even slaughtered. I pass over the most cruel murders and the plundering of houses by night attacks, and the burning not only of private dwellings but even of churches; and there were not lacking those who threw the Lord's books into those flames.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.30 (CSEL 57:28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-30).

## Letter 185.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-31
- Source: CSEL 57:28–29
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The sufferings of Catholics have borne fruit in greater unity; Augustine prays for the repentance of the rest.

### Latin text

Sed nos huius modi afflictos malis consequens consolatus est fructus. nam ubicumque a perditis ista commissa sunt, ibi feruentius atque perfectius unitas Christiana profecit et uberius laudatur dominus, qui donare dignatus est, ut serui eius passionibus suis lucrarentur fratres suos et oues eius mortifero errore dispersas in pacem salutis aeternae suo sanguine congregarent. potens est dominus et misericors. quem cotidie rogamus, ut etiam ceteris det paenitentiam et resipiscant de diaboli laqueis, a quo captiui tenentur secundum ipsius uoluntatem, qui non quaerunt. nisi unde nobis calumnientur et retribuant mala pro bonis, quia nec intellegere nouerunt, quem circa eos animum dilectionemque seruemus et quo modo eos uelimus secundum domini praeceptum, quod per Ezechielem prophetam pastoribus dedit, reuocare errantes et perditos inuenire.

### English translation (Claude)

But the fruit that followed consoled us, afflicted by such evils. For wherever these things were committed by the lost, there Christian unity advanced more fervently and more completely, and the Lord is praised more richly, who deigned to grant that his servants should gain their brothers by their sufferings and gather by their blood his sheep, scattered by deadly error, into the peace of eternal salvation. The Lord is powerful and merciful, and we pray him daily to give repentance to the rest too, that they may come to their senses from the snares of the devil, by whom they are held captive to his will. They seek nothing but grounds for slandering us and returning evil for good, because they do not know how to understand what mind and love we keep toward them, and how we wish, according to the Lord's command given to shepherds through the prophet Ezekiel, to bring back the straying and find the lost.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:25–26: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 35:12 (34:12 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Ezek 34:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 2 Tim 2:25–26; Ps 35:12 (34:12 LXX/Vulgate); Ezek 34:4, 16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.31 (CSEL 57:28–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-31).

## Letter 185.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-32
- Source: CSEL 57:29–30
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Like David mourning Absalom but consoled by peace, the church grieves for the few who die but rejoices in the many freed.

### Latin text

Illi autem, quod et alibi aliquando diximus. et, quod nobis faciunt, sibi non inputant et, quod sibi faciunt, nobis inputant. quis enim nostrum uelit non solum aliquem illorum perire uerum etiam aliquid perdere? sed si aliter non meruit habere pacem domus Dauid, nisi Absalon filius eius in bello, quod contra patrem gerebat, fuisset extinctus, quamuis magna cura mandauerit suis, ut eum, quantum possent, uiuum saluumque seruarent, ut esset, cui paenitenti paternus affectus ignosceret, quid ei restitit nisi perditum flere et sui regni pace adquisita suam maestitiam consolari? sic ergo catholica mater bellantibus aduersus eam quid aliud quam filiis suis, quia utique ex ipsa magna arbore, quae ramorum suorum porrectione toto orbe diffunditur, iste in Africa ramusculus fractus est, cum eos caritate parturiat, ut redeant ad radicem, sine qua ueram uitam habere non possunt, si aliquorum perditione tam multos ceteros colligit, praesertim quia isti non sicut Absalon casu bellico sed spontaneo magis interitu pereunt, dolorem materni cordis lenit et sanat tantorum liberatione populorum. quorum si uideas in Christi pace laetitias, frequentias. alacritates et ad hymnos audiendos et canendos et ad uerbum dei percipiendum celebres hilaresque conuentus multorumque in eis cum dolore magno recordationem praeteriti erroris et cum gaudio considerationem cognitae ueritatis et cum indignatione et detestatione mendacium magistrorum, quod modo cognoscant, de nostris sacramentis quam falsa iactauerint, multorum etiam in eis confessiones, quod olim uellent esse catholici nec inter homines tanti furoris auderent, horum ergo populorum congregationes per plurimas Africae regiones ab illa perditione liberatorum si sub uno conspectu uideres, tunc diceres nimiae fuisse crudelitatis, si, dum timeretur, ne homines desperati et istorum innumerabili multitudini nulla aestimatione comparandi suis et uoluntariis ignibus cremarentur, isti in aeternum perdendi et sempiternis ignibus cruciandi relinquerentur.

### English translation (Claude)

They, however, as we have said elsewhere too, do not charge themselves with what they do to us, and they charge us with what they do to themselves. For which of us would wish not only that any of them should perish, but even that he should lose anything? But if the house of David could not deserve to have peace unless his son Absalom was killed in the war he waged against his father, although David had ordered his men with great care to keep him alive and safe as far as they could, so that there might be one whom a father's affection could pardon on his repentance, what was left to him but to weep for the lost son and console his sorrow with the peace of his kingdom regained? So, then, the Catholic mother: when those who wage war against her are her own sons (for certainly this little branch in Africa was broken from that great tree which, by the spreading of its branches, is spread through the whole world), while she travails with them in love that they may return to the root, without which they cannot have true life, if by the loss of some she gathers so many others, especially since these perish not by the chance of war like Absalom but rather by a death of their own choosing, she soothes and heals the grief of a mother's heart by the deliverance of such great peoples. If you could see their joys in the peace of Christ, their crowds, their eagerness, their thronged and cheerful assemblies for hearing and singing hymns and receiving the word of God; and in many of them the remembrance of past error with great grief, and the contemplation of the truth now known with joy, and indignation and loathing of their lying teachers, because they now know what falsehoods those teachers boasted about our sacraments; and the confessions of many that they had long wished to be Catholics but did not dare among men of such fury: if, then, you saw in one view the congregations of these peoples, freed from that perdition throughout very many regions of Africa, you would then say that it would have been excessive cruelty if, through fear that desperate men, in no way comparable to the countless multitude of these, might burn themselves in their own voluntary fires, these were left to perish forever and be tormented in everlasting fires.

### Scripture references

- 2 Sam 18:5: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 18:33: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 2 Sam 18:5, 33; Rom 11:17–24 (branch broken from the tree).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.32 (CSEL 57:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-32).

## Letter 185.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-33
- Source: CSEL 57:30–31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the Donatists to two men in a collapsing house: one should be rescued even if the other kills himself.

### Latin text

Si enim duo aliqui in una domo habitarent, quam certissime sciremus esse ruituram, nobisque id praenuntiantibus nollent credere atque in ea manere persistant, si eos inde possemus eruere uel inuitos, quibus imminentem illam ruinam postea monstraremus, ut redire ulterius sub eius periculum non auderent, puto, nisi faceremus, non inmerito crudeles iudicaremur. porro si unus illorum nobis diceret: Quando intraueritis eruere nos, me ipsum continuo trucidabo alter autem nec exire quidem inde nec erui uellet sed neque necare se auderet. quid eligeremus? utrum ambos ruinae opprimendos relinquere, an uno saltem per misericordem nostram operam liberato alterum non culpa nostra sed sua potius interire? nemo est tam infelix, qui non, quid fieri in talibus causis oporteat, facillime iudicet. et de duobus hominibus uno scilicet perdito et uno liberato similitudinem istam proposui. quid ergo sentiendum est de quibusdam paucis perditis et innumerabili multitudine populorum liberatorum? non enim uel tot sunt illi homines, qui sua uoluntate pereunt, quot liberantur per istas leges ab illa pestifera aeternaque pernicie fundi. pagi, uici, castella, municipia, ciuitates.

### English translation (Claude)

For suppose two people were living in a house which we knew most certainly would collapse, and when we foretold it they would not believe us and persisted in staying in it: if we could pull them out even against their will, and afterward show them the impending collapse so that they would not dare to return into its danger, I think that if we did not do it, we would rightly be judged cruel. Further, if one of them said to us, “When you come in to pull us out, I will kill myself at once,” while the other neither wished to come out nor to be pulled out, but did not dare to kill himself, what would we choose? To leave both to be crushed by the collapse, or, with one at least freed by our merciful effort, to let the other perish, not by our fault but rather by his own? No one is so unhappy as not to judge very easily what ought to be done in such cases. And I have offered this comparison about two people, one lost and one freed. What then should we think about a few lost and a countless multitude of peoples freed? For those who perish by their own will are not as many as the estates, villages, hamlets, forts, towns, and cities freed by these laws from that pestilent and eternal destruction.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.33 (CSEL 57:30–31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-33).

## Letter 185.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-34
- Source: CSEL 57:31
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If we would rescue even one person from a falling house despite others' suicides, how much more must we work for eternal salvation.

### Latin text

Si autem diligentius rem, de qua loquimur, cogitemus, puto. quod, si plurimi essent in domo ruitura et inde saltem unus liberari posset atque, id cum facere conaremur, alii se ipsos praecipitio necarent, dolorem de ceteris nostrum de unius saltem salute consolaremur, non tamen, ne se ipsos alii perderent, perire uniuersos nullo liberato permitteremus. quid igitur de opere misericordiae, quod pro uita aeterna adipiscenda et poena aeterna euitanda hominibus debemus inpendere, iudicandum est, si pro salute ista non solum temporali sed etiam breui ad ipsum tempus exiguum liberanda sic nos hominibus subuenire ratio uera et benigna compellit?

### English translation (Claude)

But if we consider more carefully the matter we are speaking of, I think that if very many were in a house about to collapse, and at least one could be freed from it, and, when we tried to do so, the others killed themselves by throwing themselves down, we would console our grief for the rest by the safety of at least the one; yet we would not allow all to perish with none freed, so that the others might not destroy themselves. What judgment, then, must be passed on the work of mercy which we owe to people for gaining eternal life and avoiding eternal punishment, if true and kindly reason compels us to help people in this way for the sake of a safety that is not only temporal but brief, to be saved for a short time?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.34 (CSEL 57:31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-34).

## Letter 185.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-35
- Source: CSEL 57:31–32
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Catholics do not covet Donatist property; they wish to share church goods, which belong to the poor, with those who join them.

### Latin text

Quod autem nobis obiciunt, quod res eorum concupiscamus et auferamus, utinam catholici fiant et non solum, quae dicunt sua, sed etiam nostra in pace nobiscum et caritate possideant! usque adeo autem calumniandi cupiditate caecantur, ut non adtendant, quam sint inter se contraria, quae loquuntur. ipsi certe dicunt et inuidiosissime sibi conqueri uidentur, quod eos in nostram communionem uiolento legum imperio coartamus. hoc utique nullo modo faceremus, si res eorum possidere uellemus. quis auarus quaerit conpossessorem? quis dominandi cupiditate inflammatus uel fastu dominationis elatus desiderat habere consortem? ipsos certe adtendant quondam suos iam nostros socios et fraterna nobis dilectione coniunctos, quem ad modum sua teneant non solum, quae habebant. sed etiam nostra, quae non habebant, quae tamen, si pauperum conpauperes sumus. et nostra sunt et illorum; si autem priuatim, quae nobis sufficiant, possidemus, non sunt illa nostra sed pauperum, quorum procurationem quodam modo gerimus. non proprietatem nobis usurpatione damnabili uindicamus.

### English translation (Claude)

As for their charge that we covet and take away their property: would that they became Catholics and possessed in peace and love with us not only what they call theirs but also what is ours! But they are so blinded by the desire to slander that they do not notice how contradictory their statements are. They certainly say, and seem to complain most bitterly, that we force them into our communion by the violent command of the laws. We would certainly in no way do this if we wished to possess their property. What greedy man seeks a co-owner? Who, inflamed with the desire to dominate or puffed up with the pride of dominion, wishes to have a partner? Let them look at those who were once theirs and are now our companions, joined to us in brotherly love: how they hold not only what they had, but also what was ours, which they did not have; and yet, if we are poor alongside the poor, these things are both ours and theirs; but if we privately possess what suffices for us, those things are not ours but the poor's, whose management we carry on in a certain way; we do not claim ownership for ourselves by damnable usurpation.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.35 (CSEL 57:31–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-35).

## Letter 185.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-36
- Source: CSEL 57:32–33
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Donatist church property has passed by law to the Catholic Church; the Donatists are invited to share it in unity.

### Latin text

Quicquid ergo nomine ecclesiarum partis Donati possidebatur, Christiani imperatores legibus religiosis cum ipsis ecclesiis ad catholicam transire iusserunt. cum ergo nobiscum sint plebes earundem ecclesiarum, nobiscum pauperes, qui eisdem possessiunculis alebantur, ipsi potius foris positi desinant concupiscere aliena, sed intrent in unitatis societatem, ut pariter gubernemus non illa tantum, quae dicunt sua. uerum etiam, quae dicuntur et nostra. scriptum est enim: Omnia uestra, nos autem Christi, Christus autem dei. sub illo capite in uno eius corpore unum simus et de istis talibus rebus faciamus, quod scriptum est in actibus apostolorum: Erat illis anima una et cor unum et nemo dicebat aliquid proprium, sed erant illis omnia communia. amemus quod cantamus: Ecce quam bonum et quam iucundum habitare fratres in unum, ut sic experiantur et sciant, quam ueraciter ad eos clamet mater catholica, quod scribit beatus apostolus ad Corinthios: Non quaero, quae sunt uestra, sed uos.

### English translation (Claude)

Whatever, then, was possessed in the name of the churches of the party of Donatus, the Christian emperors by religious laws ordered to pass to the Catholic Church together with the churches themselves. Since, then, the congregations of those same churches are with us, and the poor who were fed from those same small possessions are with us, let them rather, who are placed outside, cease to covet what belongs to others, and enter into the fellowship of unity, so that we may manage together not only what they call theirs but also what is called ours. For it is written: “All things are yours, and you are Christ's, and Christ is God's.” Under that head, in his one body, let us be one, and with such things let us do what is written in the Acts of the Apostles: “They had one soul and one heart, and no one called anything his own, but they had all things in common.” Let us love what we sing: “Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in unity,” so that they may experience and know how truly the Catholic mother cries out to them what the blessed apostle writes to the Corinthians: “I do not seek what is yours, but you.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:22–23: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 4:32: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 133:1 (132:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 3:22–23; Acts 4:32; Ps 133:1 (132:1 LXX/Vulgate); 2 Cor 12:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.36 (CSEL 57:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-36).

## Letter 185.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-37
- Source: CSEL 57:33
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The question is who belongs to the righteous, not who holds property; the Donatist claim to justify those they baptize usurps God's role.

### Latin text

Si autem consideremus, quod scriptum est in libro sapientiae: Ideo iusti tulerunt spolia impiorum, item quod legitur in prouerbiis: Thesaurizantur autem iustis diuitiae impiorum, tunc uidebimus non esse quaerendum, qui habeant res haereticorum, sed qui sint in societate iustorum. scimus quidem illos tantam sibi adrogare iustitiam, ut eam se iactent non solum habere sed etiam aliis hominibus dare. a se quippe dicunt iustificari eum, quem baptizauerint. ubi nihil eis restat nisi dicere illi, qui baptizatur ab eis, ut in baptizatorem suum credat. cur enim non faciat, quando apostolus dicit: Credenti in eum, qui iustificat impium, deputatur fides eius ad iustitiam? in ipsum ergo credat, si eum ipse iustificat, ut deputetur fides eius ad iustitiam. sed puto, quod etiam ipsi se ipsos horrent, si tamen ista uel cogitare dignantur. iustus enim et iustificans non est nisi deus. potest autem et de istis dici, quod dixit apostolus de Iudaeis, quia ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam iustitiam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti.

### English translation (Claude)

But if we consider what is written in the book of Wisdom, “Therefore the righteous took the spoils of the ungodly,” and likewise what is read in Proverbs, “But the wealth of the ungodly is stored up for the righteous,” then we shall see that the question is not who holds the property of heretics, but who are in the fellowship of the righteous. We know indeed that they claim such righteousness for themselves that they boast not only of having it but even of giving it to others. For they say that whoever they baptize is justified by them. Nothing is left for them but to tell the one baptized by them to believe in his baptizer. For why should he not, when the apostle says, “To one who believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness”? Let him believe in him, then, if he justifies him, so that his faith may be reckoned as righteousness. But I think even they shudder at themselves, if indeed they deign even to think of such things. For no one is righteous and justifying except God. And of them too what the apostle said of the Jews can be said: that, being ignorant of God's righteousness and wishing to establish their own righteousness, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God.

### Scripture references

- Prov 13:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:26: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 10:20 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Wis 10:20 (outside the 66 books); Prov 13:22; Rom 4:5; Rom 10:3. Allusion: Rom 3:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.37 (CSEL 57:33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-37).

## Letter 185.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-38
- Source: CSEL 57:33–34
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: No one may claim to be righteous of himself or sinless in this life; the church will be without spot only at the resurrection.

### Latin text

Absit autem, ut quisquam nostrum ita se iustum dicat, ut aut suam iustitiam uelit constituere, id est quasi a se ipso sibi datam, cum dicatur ei: Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? aut sine peccato se esse iactare audeat in hac uita, sicut ipsi in nostra conlatione dixerunt in ea se esse ecclesia, quae iam non habet maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi, nescientes hoc in eis modo compleri, qui uel post baptismum continuo uel dimissis debitis, quae dimittenda in oratione poscuntur, de hoc exeunt corpore, in tota uero ecclesia tunc futurum. ut sit omnino non habens maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi, quando dicendum erit: Ubi est, mors, uictoria tua? ubi est. mors, aculeus tuus? aculeus enim mortis est peccatum.

### English translation (Claude)

God forbid that any of us should call himself righteous in such a way as either to wish to establish his own righteousness, that is, as if given to himself by himself, when it is said to him, “For what do you have that you did not receive?” or to dare boast that he is without sin in this life, as they themselves said at our conference that they are in that church which already has no spot or wrinkle or any such thing. They do not know that this is fulfilled now in those who leave this body either immediately after baptism or after the debts have been forgiven which are asked to be forgiven in prayer; but in the whole church it will be the case that it has no spot or wrinkle or any such thing only when it will be said, “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting? The sting of death is sin.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:55–56: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 4:7; Eph 5:27; 1 Cor 15:55–56. Allusion: Matt 6:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.38 (CSEL 57:33–34; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-38).

## Letter 185.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-39
- Source: CSEL 57:34–35
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The whole church prays “forgive us our debts” and is cleansed through baptism toward the perfection Christ will give it on the last day.

### Latin text

In hac autem uita, ubi corpus, quod corrumpitur. adgrauat animam, si ecclesia eorum iam talis est. non ergo dicant deo, quod dominus orare nos docuit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. cum enim in baptismo cuncta dimissa sint. ut quid hoc poscit ecclesia. si iam etiam in hac uita non habet maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi? contemnant et apostolum Iohannem clamantem in epistula sua: Si dixerimus! quia peccatum non habemus. nos ipsos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est. si autem confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis est et iustus, qui dimittat nobis peccata et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate. propter hanc spem dicit uniuersa ecclesia: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, ut non "sed confitentes mundet ab omni iniquitate atque ita sibi exhibeat dominus Christus in illa die gloriosam ecclesiam non habentem maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi, quam modo mundat lauacro aquae in uerbo. quia neque aliquid remanet in baptismo, quod non dimittatur praeteritorum omnium peccatorum - si tamen ipse baptismus non frustra foris habeatur, sed aut intus detur aut. si iam foris datus est, non foris cum illo remaneatur —. et, quicquid ab eis, qui post acceptum baptismum hic uiuunt. humana infirmitate contrahitur quarumque culparum, propter ipsum lauacrum dimittitur. neque enim aliquid prodest non baptizato dicere: Dimitte nobis debita nostra.

### English translation (Claude)

But in this life, where the corruptible body weighs down the soul, if their church is already such, then let them not say to God what the Lord taught us to pray: “Forgive us our debts.” For since everything was forgiven in baptism, why does the church ask this if already in this life it has no spot or wrinkle or any such thing? Let them also despise the apostle John, crying out in his letter: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. But if we confess our sins, he who is faithful and just will forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all iniquity.” Because of this hope the whole church says, “Forgive us our debts,” so that he may cleanse from all iniquity those who confess, and so the Lord Christ may present to himself on that day a glorious church, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing, which he now cleanses by the washing of water in the word. For nothing remains in baptism that is not forgiven of all past sins (if only baptism itself is not held outside to no purpose, but is either given inside, or, if it has already been given outside, one does not remain outside with it); and whatever is contracted, of any faults whatever, by human weakness by those who live here after receiving baptism is forgiven because of that very washing. For it profits nothing for one who is not baptized to say, “Forgive us our debts.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:8–9: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:26–27: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text is defective at “ut non "sed confitentes”; translated by sense (“those who confess”).
- Quotations and allusions: Wis 9:15 (outside the 66 books); Matt 6:12; 1 John 1:8–9; Eph 5:26–27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.39 (CSEL 57:34–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-39).

## Letter 185.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-40
- Source: CSEL 57:35
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The church is now being cleansed and will be perfect at the resurrection; Christ justifies only his body, which the Donatists should enter.

### Latin text

Ita modo mundat ecclesiam suam lauacro aquae in uerbo, ut tunc eam sibi exhibeat non habentem maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi, totam scilicet pulchram atque perfectam, quando absorbebitur mors in uictoriam. nunc ergo, in quantum uiget in nobis, quod ex deo nati sumus ex fide uiuentes, iusti sumus: in quantum autem reliquias mortalitatis ex Adam trahimus, sine peccato non sumus. et illud enim uerum est: Qui natus est ex deo, non peccat. et illud uerum est: Si dixerimus, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est. dominus itaque Christus et iustus est et iustificans. nos autem iustificati gratis per gratiam ipsius. non autem iustificat nisi corpus suum. quod est ecclesia, et ideo, si corpus Christi tollit spolia impiorum et corpori Christi thesaurizantur diuitiae impiorum, non debent impii foris remanere, ut calumnientur. sed intrare potius, ut iustificentur.

### English translation (Claude)

So he now cleanses his church by the washing of water in the word, so that he may then present it to himself having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that is, wholly beautiful and perfect, when death will be swallowed up in victory. Now, therefore, in so far as what we are by being born of God, living by faith, is strong in us, we are righteous; but in so far as we drag along the remnants of mortality from Adam, we are not without sin. For both are true: “Whoever is born of God does not sin,” and “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” So the Lord Christ is both righteous and the one who justifies, while we are justified freely by his grace. And he justifies only his body, which is the church; and therefore, if the body of Christ takes the spoils of the ungodly, and the wealth of the ungodly is stored up for the body of Christ, the ungodly ought not to remain outside to slander, but rather to come in to be justified.

### Scripture references

- Eph 5:26–27: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:24: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 13:22: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 10:20 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Eph 5:26–27; 1 Cor 15:54; 1 John 3:9; 1 John 1:8; Rom 3:24, 26; Wis 10:20 (outside the 66 books); Prov 13:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.40 (CSEL 57:35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-40).

## Letter 185.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-41
- Source: CSEL 57:35–36
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Wis 5:1 promises vindication only to the righteous: Naboth against Ahab, the Catholic against the heretic, not the reverse.

### Latin text

Unde et illud, quod de die iudicii scriptum est: Tunc stabunt iusti in magna constantia aduersus eos, qui se angustiauerunt et abstulerunt labores eorum. non utique sic intellegendum est, quia stabit Chananaeus aduersus Israhel, cum Chananaei labores abstulerit Israhel. sed stabit Nabuthaeus aduersus Achab, quoniam labores Nabuthaei abstulit Achab; Chananaeus quippe impius, Nabuthaeus iustus. eodem modo non stabit paganus aduersus Christianum. qui abstulit labores eius. quando idolorum expoliata uel donata sunt templa, sed stabit Christianus aduersus paganum, qui abstulit labores eius, quando martyrum strata sunt corpora. sic ergo non stabit haereticus aduersus catholicum, qui accepit labores eius, quando praeualuerunt leges catholicorum imperatorum, sed stabit catholicus aduersus haereticum, qui abstulit labores eius, quando praeualebant furores impiorum Circumcellionum. ipsa quippe soluit scriptura quaestionem. quae non ait (tunc stabunt homines) sed tunc stabunt iusti et ideo in magna constantia, quia in bona conscientia.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence also what is written of the day of judgment, “Then the righteous will stand with great boldness against those who afflicted them and took away their labors,” is certainly not to be understood as though the Canaanite will stand against Israel, because Israel took away the Canaanite's labors; but Naboth will stand against Ahab, because Ahab took away Naboth's labors; for the Canaanite was ungodly, Naboth righteous. In the same way, the pagan will not stand against the Christian who took away his labors when the temples of idols were despoiled or given away; but the Christian will stand against the pagan who took away his labors when the bodies of the martyrs were laid low. So, then, the heretic will not stand against the Catholic who received his labors when the laws of the Catholic emperors prevailed; but the Catholic will stand against the heretic who took away his labors when the fury of the ungodly Circumcellions prevailed. For Scripture itself resolves the question, since it does not say, “Then men will stand,” but “Then the righteous will stand,” and therefore “with great boldness,” because with a good conscience.

### Scripture references

- 1 Kgs 21:1–16: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 5:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Wis 5:1 (outside the 66 books). Allusion: 1 Kgs 21 (Naboth and Ahab).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.41 (CSEL 57:35–36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-41).

## Letter 185.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-42
- Source: CSEL 57:36–37
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: No one cut off from the body of Christ can have righteousness, as a severed limb loses life; the Donatists should come in and share the church's goods.

### Latin text

Iustus autem hic nemo est iustitia sua. id est tamquam sibi a se ipso facta, sed, ut dicit apostolus, sicut unicuique deus partitus est mensuram fidei. sequitur autem et adiungit: Sicut enim in uno corpore multa membra habemus. omnia autem membra non eosdem actus habent, ita multi unum corpus sumus in Christo. ac per hoc nemo potest esse iustus, quam diu fuerit ab unitate huius corporis separatus. quem ad modum enim membrum, si praecidatur ab hominis uiui corpore. non potest tenere spiritum uitae, sic homo, qui praeciditur de Christi iusti corpore, nullo modo potest spiritum tenere iustitiae; etiamsi figuram membri teneat, quam sumpsit in corpore. in huius ergo compagem corporis ueniant et labores suos non dominandi cupiditate sed bene utendi pietate possideant. nos autem uoluntatem nostram, ut iam dictum est, ab huius cupiditatis sordibus quolibet inimico iudicante purgamus, quando eos ipsos, quorum labores dicuntur. ut nobiscum et illis et nostris in societate catholica utantur, quantum ualemus, inquirimus.

### English translation (Claude)

But no one here is righteous by his own righteousness, that is, as if made for himself by himself, but, as the apostle says, according as God has apportioned to each the measure of faith. And he goes on to add: “For as in one body we have many members, and all the members do not have the same function, so we, being many, are one body in Christ.” And therefore no one can be righteous as long as he is separated from the unity of this body. For just as a limb, if it is cut off from the body of a living man, cannot keep the spirit of life, so a man who is cut off from the body of the righteous Christ can in no way keep the spirit of righteousness, even if he keeps the shape of the limb which he took in the body. Let them come, then, into the structure of this body and possess their labors, not out of the desire to dominate but out of the piety of using them well. As for us, we cleanse our will, as has already been said, from the filth of this desire, with any enemy as judge, when we seek out, as much as we can, the very people whose labors they are said to be, so that they may use both theirs and ours with us in Catholic fellowship.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:3–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Rom 12:3–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.42 (CSEL 57:36–37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-42).

## Letter 185.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-43
- Source: CSEL 57:37–38
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Donatists coming over are not rebaptized, but must do penance; they receive the unity of the Spirit and love, without which baptism does not profit.

### Latin text

Sed hoc est. inquiunt, quod nos mouet: si iniusti sumus, quare nos quaeritis? quibus respondemus: Quaerimus uos iniustos, ne permaneatis iniusti: quaerimus perditos, ut de inuentis gaudere possimus dicentes: Mortuus erat frater et reuixit, perierat et inuentus est. Quare ergo me, inquit. non baptizas, ut abluas a peccatis? respondeo: Quia non facio iniuriam characteri imperatoris. cum errorem corrigo desertoris. Quare, inquit, apud te uel paenitentiam non ago? Immo nisi egeris. saluus esse non poteris; quo modo enim gaudebis te esse correctum. nisi doleas fuisse peruersum? Quid ergo. inquit, apud uos, cum ad uos transimus, accipimus? respondeo: Non quidem accipitis baptismum. qui nobis extra compagem corporis Christi inesse potuit, prodesse non potuit, sed accipitis unitatem spiritus in uinculo pacis, sine qua nemo poterit uidere deum, et caritatem, quae, sicut scriptum est, cooperit multitudinem peccatorum. quod tam magnum bonum, sine quo nec linguas hominum et angelorum nec scientiam omnium sacramentorum nec prophetiam nec tantam fidem, qua montes transferantur, nec omnia. quae possidet homo, distributa pauperibus nec corporis in ignibus passionem prodesse aliquid apostolus testis est, hoc ergo tam magnum bonum si paruum uel nullum putatis, merito infeliciter erratis, merito, si in unitatem catholicam non transitis, peritis.

### English translation (Claude)

“But this,” they say, “is what troubles us: if we are unrighteous, why do you seek us?” We answer them: “We seek you who are unrighteous so that you may not remain unrighteous; we seek the lost so that we may rejoice over them when found, saying, ‘Our brother was dead and has come to life again; he was lost and is found.’” “Why then,” one says, “do you not baptize me, to wash me from sins?” I answer: “Because I do not wrong the emperor's mark when I correct the deserter's error.” “Why,” he says, “do I not at least do penance with you?” “On the contrary, unless you do, you cannot be saved; for how will you rejoice at being corrected unless you grieve at having been perverse?” “What then,” he says, “do we receive with you when we come over to you?” I answer: “You do not indeed receive baptism, which could be in you outside the structure of the body of Christ, but could not profit you; but you receive the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace, without which no one will be able to see God, and love, which, as it is written, covers a multitude of sins.” The apostle is witness that without so great a good neither the tongues of men and angels, nor the knowledge of all mysteries, nor prophecy, nor faith so great as to move mountains, nor all that a man possesses distributed to the poor, nor the suffering of the body in fire profits anything. If, then, you think so great a good small or nothing, you rightly err unhappily; you rightly perish if you do not come over to Catholic unity.

### Scripture references

- Luke 15:32: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:3: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 12:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:1–3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Do penance” renders paenitentiam agere, the church's formal discipline. Quotations and allusions: Luke 15:32; Eph 4:3; Heb 12:14; 1 Pet 4:8; 1 Cor 13:1–3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.43 (CSEL 57:37–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-43).

## Letter 185.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-44
- Source: CSEL 57:38–39
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Receiving Donatist clergy in their offices is like grafting, a slight wound to the church's strictness healed by peace and love.

### Latin text

Si ergo, inquiunt, oportet, ut nos extra ecclesiam et aduersus ecclesiam fuisse paeniteat, ut salui esse possimus, quo modo post istam paenitentiam apud uos clerici uel etiam episcopi permanemus? hoc non fieret, quoniam re uera, quod fatendum est, fieri non deberet, nisi pacis ipsius compensatione sanaretur. sed sibi hoc dicant et multo maxime humiliter doleant. qui in tanta morte praecisionis iacent, ut isto quodam uulnere matris catholicae reuiuiscant. cum enim praecisus ramus inseritur, fit aliud uulnus in arbore, quo possit recipi, ut uiuat, qui sine uita radicis peribat; sed cum receptus recipienti coaluerit, et uigor consequetur et fructus, si autem non coaluerit, ille quidem arescit, sed uita arboris permanebit. est enim et tale inserendi genus, ut nullo praeciso ramo, qui intus est. ille. qui foris est, inseratur non tamen nullo sed uel leuissimo arboris uulnere. ita ergo et isti cum ad radicem catholicam ueniunt nec eis quamuis post erroris sui paenitentiam honor clericatus aut episcopatus aufertur, fit quidem aliquid tam quam in cortice arboris matris contra integritatem seueritatis. uerum tamen, quia neque, qui plantat, est aliquid neque, qui rigat, ad dei misericordiam precibus fusis coalescente insitorum pace ramorum caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum.

### English translation (Claude)

“If, then,” they say, “we must repent of having been outside the church and against the church in order to be saved, how is it that after this penance we remain clerics or even bishops among you?” This would not be done, since in truth, it must be admitted, it ought not to be done, unless it were healed by the compensation of peace itself. But let them say this to themselves, and much more grieve humbly, who lie in so deep a death of being cut off that they come to life again by a kind of wound to the Catholic mother. For when a cut branch is grafted in, another wound is made in the tree, by which it can be received so as to live, the branch that was perishing without the life of the root; and when the received branch has grown together with the one receiving it, vigor and fruit follow; but if it does not grow together, it withers, yet the life of the tree remains. There is also a kind of grafting in which, without cutting off any branch that is inside, the one that is outside is grafted in, yet not without a wound to the tree, though a very slight one. So too with these men: when they come to the Catholic root, and the honor of the clerical office or the episcopate is not taken from them even after penance for their error, something is indeed done, as it were, in the bark of the mother tree against the strictness of severity. Yet, since neither he who plants is anything nor he who waters, … when prayers are poured out to God's mercy, and the peace of the grafted branches grows together, love covers a multitude of sins.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:17–24: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text appears defective after “neque, qui rigat” (the rest of 1 Cor 3:7 seems lost); marked “…”.
- Allusions: Rom 11:17–24; 1 Cor 3:7; 1 Pet 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.44 (CSEL 57:38–39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-44).

## Letter 185.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-45
- Source: CSEL 57:39–40
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The rule barring penitents from clerical office is discipline, not denial of pardon, and may be relaxed to heal a whole people's schism.

### Latin text

Ut enim constitueretur in ecclesia, ne quisquam post alicuius criminis paenitentiam clericatum accipiat uel ad clericatum redeat uel in clericatu maneat, non desperatione indulgentiae sed rigore factum est disciplinae; alioquin contra claues datas ecclesiae disputabitur, de quibus dictum est: Quae solueritis in terra, soluta erunt et in caelo. sed ne forsitan etiam detectis criminibus spe honoris ecclesiastici animus intumescens superbe ageret paenitentiam, seuerissime placuit, ut post actam de crimine damnabili paenitentiam nemo sit clericus, ut desperatione temporalis altitudinis medicina maior et uerior esset humilitatis. nam et sanctus Dauid de criminibus mortiferis egit paenitentiam et tamen in honore suo perstitit et beatum Petrum, quando amarissimas lacrimas fudit, utique dominum negasse paenituit et tamen apostolus mansit. sed non ideo superuacua putanda est posteriorum diligentia, qui, ubi saluti nihil detrahebatur, humilitati aliquid addiderunt, quo salus tutius muniretur, experti, credo, aliquorum fictas paenitentias per affectatas honorum potentias. cogunt enim multas inuenire medicinas multorum experimenta morborum. uerum in huius modi causis, ubi per graues dissensionum scissuras non huius aut illius hominis est periculum, sed populorum strages iacent, detrahendum est aliquid seueritati. ut maioribus malis sanandis caritas sincera subueniat.

### English translation (Claude)

For the rule was made in the church that no one should receive clerical office, or return to it, or remain in it, after doing penance for any crime, not from despair of pardon but from the rigor of discipline; otherwise there would be argument against the keys given to the church, of which it was said, “Whatever you loose on earth will be loosed also in heaven.” But lest perhaps, even when crimes were discovered, a mind swelling with hope of church honor should do penance proudly, it was decided most severely that after penance done for a damnable crime no one should be a cleric, so that, by despair of temporal elevation, the medicine of humility might be greater and truer. For holy David too did penance for deadly crimes and yet kept his honor; and blessed Peter, when he shed most bitter tears, certainly repented of having denied the Lord, and yet remained an apostle. But the care of later generations is not therefore to be thought superfluous, who, where nothing was taken from salvation, added something to humility, by which salvation might be more securely protected; having experienced, I believe, the feigned penances of some, aimed at the power of honors. For the experience of many diseases compels the discovery of many medicines. But in cases of this kind, where through grave rifts of dissension it is not the danger of this or that man, but whole peoples lie in ruin, something must be taken from severity, so that sincere love may come to the aid of healing greater evils.

### Scripture references

- Matt 18:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Sam 12:13: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:75: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 18:18. Allusions: 2 Sam 12:13; Matt 26:75.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.45 (CSEL 57:39–40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-45).

## Letter 185.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-46
- Source: CSEL 57:40
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Converted Donatist clergy may serve as clergy and bishops, but should repent humbly as Peter did and not grow proud of their reception.

### Latin text

Habeant ergo isti de praeterito detestabili errore, sicut Petrus habuit de mendaci timore, amarum dolorem et ueniant ad ecclesiam Christi ueram, hoc est matrem catholicam; sint in illa clerici. sint episcopi utiliter, qui contra illam fuerunt hostiliter; non inuidemus, immo amplectimur, optamus, hortamur et. quos in uiis et saepibus inuenimus, intrare cogimus. et sic nondum quibusdam persuademus, quia non res eorum sed ipsos quaerimus. apostolus Petrus quando saluatorem negauit et fleuit et apostolus mansit, nondum acceperat promissum spiritum sanctum; sed multo magis isti eum non acceperunt. ubi a corporis compage diuisi, quod solum corpus uiuificat spiritus sanctus, extra ecclesiam et contra ecclesiam ecclesiae sacramenta tenuerunt et tamquam ciuili bello nostris contra nos erectis signis armisque pugnarunt. ueniant; fiat pax in uirtute Hierusalem, quae uirtus caritas est, cui sanctae ciuitati dictum est: Fiat pax in uirtute tua et abundantia in turribus tuis. non se extollant aduersus maternam sollicitudinem, quam pro ipsis et pro tantis populis, quos decipiunt uel decipiebant, colligendis et habuit et habet: non superbiant. quia sic eos suscipit; non referant ad elationis suae malum. quod facit ipsa propter pacis bonum.

### English translation (Claude)

Let these men, then, have bitter grief for their past detestable error, as Peter had for his lying fear, and let them come to the true church of Christ, that is, the Catholic mother; let those who were against her as enemies be clerics in her, be bishops in her, to her profit. We do not begrudge it; rather, we embrace, we desire, we exhort; and those we find in the roads and hedges we compel to come in; and even so we do not yet persuade some that we seek not their property but themselves. The apostle Peter, when he denied the Savior, wept, and remained an apostle, had not yet received the promised Holy Spirit; but much more have these men not received him, since, divided from the structure of the body which alone the Holy Spirit gives life to, they held the church's sacraments outside the church and against the church, and fought against us, as in a civil war, with our own standards and arms raised against us. Let them come; let there be peace in the strength of Jerusalem, and that strength is love, to which holy city it was said, “Let there be peace in your strength, and abundance in your towers.” Let them not exalt themselves against the motherly care which she has had and has for gathering them and the many peoples whom they deceive or used to deceive. Let them not be proud because she receives them in this way; let them not turn to the evil of their own self-exaltation what she does for the good of peace.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:75: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 14:23: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:14: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 122:7 (121:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Matt 26:75; Luke 14:23; 2 Cor 12:14; Ps 122:7 (121:7 LXX/Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.46 (CSEL 57:40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-46).

## Letter 185.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-47
- Source: CSEL 57:40–41
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Receiving converted clergy in their offices follows the precedent of the Roman council of 313 and the Donatists' own treatment of the Maximianists.

### Latin text

Sic multitudinibus per schismata et haereses pereuntibus subuenire consueuit. hoc displicuit Lucifero, quia factum est in eis suscipiendis atque sanandis, qui ueneno perierant Arriano, et cui displicuit, in tenebras cecidit schismatis amisso lumine caritatis. hoc erga istos ab initio seruauit Africana catholica ex episcoporum sententia, qui in ecclesia Romana inter Caecilianum et partem Donati iudicauerunt damnatoque uno quodam Donato, qui auctor schismatis fuisse manifestatus est. ceteros correctos, etiamsi extra ecclesiam ordinati essent, in suis honoribus suscipiendos esse censuerunt, non quo etiam foris ab unitate corporis Christi possent habere spiritum sanctum. sed maxime propter eos. quos foris positi possent decipere et a susceptione illius muneris impedire. deinde ut etiam ipsorum infirmitas lenius excepta intus sanabilis fieret iam nulla pertinacia claudente oculos cordis aduersus euidentiam ueritatis. quid autem aliud etiam ipsi cogitauerunt, quando Maximianistas, quos in sacrilego, sicut eorum concilium indicat. schismate damnauerant et in quorum iam locum alios ordinauerant, posteaquam uiderunt ab eis populos non recedere, ne omnes perderent, in suis honoribus receperunt et baptismo, quem foris ab eis damnati dederant, nullam contradictionem quaestionemque mouerunt? quare ergo mirantur aut queruntur aut calumniantur, quod eos sic suscepimus pro uera pace Christi, et non recordantur, quid ipsi fecerint pro uana, quae contra Christum est, pace Donati? quod eorum factum si contra eos teneatur et intellegenter adseratur, quid omnino respondeant, non habebunt.

### English translation (Claude)

This is how she has been accustomed to come to the aid of multitudes perishing through schisms and heresies. This displeased Lucifer, because it was done in receiving and healing those who had perished by the Arian poison; and he whom it displeased fell into the darkness of schism, having lost the light of love. The African Catholic Church has kept this toward these men from the beginning, according to the sentence of the bishops who judged in the Roman church between Caecilian and the party of Donatus. Having condemned one Donatus, who was shown to have been the author of the schism, they decided that the rest, when corrected, should be received in their offices, even if they had been ordained outside the church; not because they could have the Holy Spirit even outside the unity of the body of Christ, but above all for the sake of those whom, placed outside, they could deceive and keep from receiving that gift; and then so that their own weakness too, received more gently, might become curable within, with no obstinacy any longer closing the eyes of the heart against the evidence of the truth. And what else did they themselves have in mind when they received back in their offices the Maximianists, whom they had condemned for sacrilegious schism, as their council shows, and in whose places they had already ordained others, once they saw that the people did not leave them, lest they lose them all; and raised no objection or question about the baptism which those condemned by them had given outside? Why then are they surprised, or complain, or slander us for receiving them in this way for the true peace of Christ, and do not remember what they themselves did for the vain peace of Donatus, which is against Christ? If this act of theirs is held against them and intelligently pressed, they will have nothing at all to answer.

### Translation notes

- Lucifer of Cagliari broke communion over the reception of former Arians. The Roman judgment is the council under Bishop Miltiades (313).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.47 (CSEL 57:40–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-47).

## Letter 185.48

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-48
- Source: CSEL 57:41–42
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Donatists' objection that rebaptism was an unforgivable sin against the Spirit would, if valid, exclude everyone who ever spoke against the Spirit.

### Latin text

Quod autem dicunt: Si peccauimus in spiritum sanctum, quia exsufflauimus baptismum uestrum, ut quid nos quaeritis, cum remitti nobis hoc peccatum omnino non possit dicente domino: Qui peccauerit in spiritum sanctum, non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro? non adtendunt, quia secundum istum sensum nemo liberandus est. quis enim non loquitur aduersus spiritum sanctum et peccat in eum, siue qui nondum est Christianus siue qui est haereticus Arrianus aut Eunomianus aut Macedonianus, qui eum dicunt esse creaturam, aut Photinianus, qui eius omnino negat aliquam esse substantiam, sed unum tantum modo esse deum patrem, siue alii haeretici, quos commemorare longum est? nulli ergo istorum liberandi sunt? aut ipsi Iudaei. quibus hoc dominus obiecit, si in eum crederent, non erant baptizandi? non enim ait saluator in baptismo remittetur, sed non remittetur, inquit, neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what they say: “If we have sinned against the Holy Spirit because we exorcised your baptism, why do you seek us, since this sin can never be forgiven us, as the Lord says, ‘Whoever sins against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come’?” they do not notice that according to this sense no one is to be freed. For who does not speak against the Holy Spirit and sin against him, whether one who is not yet a Christian, or a heretic, an Arian or Eunomian or Macedonian, who say he is a creature, or a Photinian, who denies that he has any substance at all, saying that there is only one God, the Father, or other heretics, whom it would take long to list? Are none of these, then, to be freed? Or were the Jews themselves, to whom the Lord made this charge, not to be baptized if they believed in him? For the Savior did not say, “It will be forgiven in baptism,” but, “It will not be forgiven,” he said, “either in this age or in the age to come.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 12:32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.48 (CSEL 57:41–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-48).

## Letter 185.49

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-49
- Source: CSEL 57:42–43
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The unforgivable sin against the Spirit is final impenitence: refusing forgiveness in the church's unity until death.

### Latin text

Intellegant ergo non omne sed aliquod significatum esse peccatum in spiritum sanctum, quod omnino non remittetur. sicut enim, cum dixisset: Si non uenirem, peccatum non haberent, utique non omne peccatum intellegi uoluit, quando quidem pleni erant magnis multisque peccatis, sed aliquod proprium peccatum, quod si non haberent, possent illis omnia dimitti, quae habebant, id est quod in eum uenientem non crediderunt - hoc enim peccatum non haberent. si non ueniret ―. sic etiam, cum dixit: Qui peccauerit in spiritum sanctum uel qui uerbum dixerit aduersus spiritum sanctum. non utique omne, quod in spiritum sanctum peccatur facto siue dicto sed aliquod certum et proprium intellegi uoluit. hoc est autem duritia cordis usque ad finem huius uitae. qua homo recusat in unitate corporis Christi, quod uiuificat spiritus sanctus, remissionem accipere peccatorum. cum enim dixisset discipulis: Accipite spiritum sanctum, continuo subiecit: Si cui dimiseritis peccata, dimittentur ei; si cui tenueritis, tenebuntur. huic ergo dono gratiae dei quicumque restiterit et repugnauerit uel quoquo modo ab eo fuerit alienus usque in finem huius temporalis uitae, non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro, hoc scilicet tam grande peccatum, ut eo teneantur cuncta peccata, quod non probatur ab aliquo esse commissum, nisi cum de corpore exierit. quam diu uero hic uiuit, eum, sicut dicit apostolus, patientia dei ad paenitentiam adducit; sed si ipse perseuerantissima iniquitate, sicut consequenter adiungit apostolus, secundum duritiam cordis sui et cor inpaenitens thesaurizat sibi iram in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii dei, non ei remittetur neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro.

### English translation (Claude)

Let them understand, then, that not every sin, but a certain sin against the Holy Spirit is meant, which will never be forgiven. For just as, when he had said, “If I had not come, they would not have sin,” he certainly did not wish every sin to be understood, since they were full of many great sins, but a certain particular sin, which if they did not have, all the sins they had could be forgiven them, namely, that they did not believe in him when he came (for they would not have had this sin if he had not come); so too, when he said, “Whoever sins against the Holy Spirit,” or, “whoever speaks a word against the Holy Spirit,” he certainly did not wish to be understood everything sinned against the Holy Spirit in deed or word, but a certain particular sin. And this is hardness of heart to the end of this life, by which a person refuses to receive the forgiveness of sins in the unity of the body of Christ, to which the Holy Spirit gives life. For when he had said to the disciples, “Receive the Holy Spirit,” he immediately added, “If you forgive anyone's sins, they will be forgiven him; if you retain anyone's, they will be retained.” Whoever, then, resists and fights against this gift of God's grace, or is in any way estranged from it until the end of this temporal life, it will not be forgiven him either in this age or in the age to come; this sin, that is, so great that all sins are held fast by it, and which is not proved to have been committed by anyone until he has left the body. But as long as he lives here, the patience of God, as the apostle says, leads him to repentance; but if he, by most persistent iniquity, as the apostle adds next, according to his hardness of heart and impenitent heart treasures up wrath for himself on the day of wrath and of the revelation of the righteous judgment of God, it will not be forgiven him either in this age or in the age to come.

### Scripture references

- John 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 12:32: quotation, high confidence
- John 20:22–23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:4–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 15:22; Matt 12:32; John 20:22–23; Rom 2:4–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.49 (CSEL 57:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-27/#p-185-49).

## Letter 185.50

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-185-50
- Source: CSEL 57:43–44
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Holy Spirit gives life only within the Catholic Church, the body of Christ; the Donatists have the sacrament outside but not its reality.

### Latin text

Isti autem, cum quibus agimus uel de quibus agimus, non sunt desperandi; adhuc enim sunt in corpore. sed non quaerant spiritum sanctum nisi in Christi corpore, cuius habent foris sacramentum, sed rem ipsam non tenent intus, cuius illud est sacramentum, et ideo sibi iudicium manducant et bibunt. unus enim panis sacramentum est unitatis, quoniam, sicut apostolus dicit, unus panis, unum corpus multi sumus. proinde ecclesia catholica sola corpus est Christi, cuius ille caput est saluator corporis sui. extra hoc corpus neminem uiuificat spiritus sanctus, quia, sicut ipse dicit apostolus, caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. non est autem particeps diuinae caritatis, qui hostis est unitatis. non habent itaque spiritum sanctum, qui sunt extra ecclesiam; de illis quippe scriptum est: Qui se ipsos segregant, animales, spiritum non habentes. sed nec ille eum percipit, qui fictus est in ecclesia, quoniam et inde scriptum est: Sanctus enim spiritus disciplinae effugiet fictum. qui ergo uult habere spiritum sanctum. caueat foris ab ecclesia remanere, caueat in eam simulatus intrare aut, si iam talis intrauit, caueat in eadem simulatione persistere. ut ueraciter coalescat arbori uitae.

### English translation (Claude)

But these men, with whom or about whom we are dealing, are not to be despaired of; for they are still in the body. But let them not seek the Holy Spirit except in the body of Christ, whose sacrament they have outside, but do not hold inside the reality itself of which that is the sacrament; and therefore they eat and drink judgment on themselves. For the one bread is the sacrament of unity, since, as the apostle says, “We, being many, are one bread, one body.” Accordingly, the Catholic Church alone is the body of Christ, of which he is the head, the savior of his body. Outside this body the Holy Spirit gives life to no one, because, as the apostle himself says, “The love of God has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” But one who is an enemy of unity does not share in divine love. So those who are outside the church do not have the Holy Spirit; for of them it is written, “Those who separate themselves, natural men, not having the Spirit.” But neither does he receive the Spirit who is in the church by pretense, since of this too it is written, “For the holy Spirit of discipline will flee from deceit.” Whoever, then, wishes to have the Holy Spirit, let him beware of remaining outside the church, beware of entering it in pretense, or, if he has already entered thus, beware of persisting in that pretense, so that he may truly grow together with the tree of life.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Jude 1:19: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 1:5 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 11:29; 1 Cor 10:17; Eph 5:23; Rom 5:5; Jude 19; Wis 1:5 (outside the 66 books). Translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.50 (CSEL 57:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-185-50).

## Letter 185.51

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-185-51
- Source: CSEL 57:44
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by commending to Boniface the work of correcting the Donatists.

### Latin text

Prolixum tibi librum direxi et tuis fortasse occupationibus onerosum. si ergo potuerit tibi uel partibus legi. dabit tibi dominus intellectum, ut habeas, quid respondeas eis corrigendis atque sanandis, quos etiam tibi ipsi tamquam fideli filio mater ecclesia, ubi potueris et quo modo potueris siue ipse loquendo et respondendo siue ad doctores ecclesiae perducendo, in adiutorio domini corrigendos sanandosque commendat.

### English translation (Claude)

I have sent you a long book, perhaps burdensome for your occupations. If, then, it can be read to you even in parts, the Lord will give you understanding, so that you may have an answer for correcting and healing those whom mother church commends to you yourself too, as a faithful son, to be corrected and healed with the Lord's help, wherever and however you can, whether by speaking and answering yourself or by bringing them to the teachers of the church.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 185.51 (CSEL 57:44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-185-51).

## Letter 186.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-1
- Source: CSEL 57:45–46
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine and Alypius write to Paulinus of Nola about Pelagius, whom they once loved as orthodox and now love in hope of his correction, explaining how they came to know his teaching on grace.

### Latin text

Tandem aliquando prouidit nobis deus litterarum fidissimum perlatorem omnium nostrum merito carissimum fratrem Ianuarium, per quem, etiamsi non scriberemus, omnia, quae circa nos sunt, posset sinceritas tua tamquam per uiuentem atque intellegentem epistulam noscere. Pelagium, quem credimus, ut ab alio distingueretur, qui Pelagius Terenti dicitur, Brittonem fuisse cognominatum, quod ut seruum dei dilexeris, nouimus; nunc autem quem ad modum diligas, ignoramus. nam et nos non solum dileximus, uerum etiam diligimus eum; sed aliter nunc diligimus, aliter aliquando dileximus: tunc enim, quia nobis rectae fidei uidebatur, nunc autem, ut ab his, quae inimica et aduersa gratiae dei sentire dicitur, illius misericordia liberetur. nam cum hoc de illo aliquamdiu fama iactaret, non utique facile credendum fuit — solet quippe fama mentiri —, sed propius, ut crederemus, accessit, quod librum quendam eius ea prorsus persuadere molientem, quae gratiam dei per unum mediatorem dei et hominum hominem Christum Iesum generi humano impertitam de fidelium cordibus creditam deleant, legimus traditum nobis a famulis Christi, qui eum talia docentem studiosissime audierant fuerantque sectati. cui quidem libro eisdem rogantibus, quia et fieri oportere uidebamus, tacito nomine auctoris, ne offensus insanabilior redderetur, unius nostrum disputatione responsum est. quo libro id continetur et multipliciter atque abundanter adseritur. quod etiam quibusdam litteris agit ad tuam uenerationem datis. ubi dicit non se debere existimari sine gratia dei defendere liberum arbitrium, cum possibilitatem uolendi atque operandi. sine qua nihil boni uelle atque agere ualeremus, a creatore nobis naturaliter insitam diceret, ut uidelicet haec intellegatur doctore ipso gratia dei, quae paganis atque Christianis. impiis et piis, infidelibus fidelibusque communis est.

### English translation (Claude)

At long last God has provided us with a most trustworthy bearer of letters, our brother Januarius, deservedly most dear to all of us. Through him, even if we did not write, Your Sincerity could learn everything about our affairs as through a living and understanding letter. We know that you loved Pelagius as a servant of God (we believe he was surnamed 'the Briton' to distinguish him from another, who is called Pelagius son of Terentius); but how you love him now, we do not know. For we too not only loved him but love him still; but we love him now in one way and loved him once in another. Then it was because he seemed to us to be of the right faith; now it is in order that, by God's mercy, he may be set free from the views that he is said to hold, which are hostile and opposed to the grace of God. For when report had for some time spread this about him, it was certainly not to be readily believed (report is apt to lie); but what brought us nearer to believing it was that we read a certain book of his, handed to us by servants of Christ who had listened to him most eagerly as he taught such things and had followed him. That book labours to persuade people of exactly those things that would blot out from the hearts of believers their faith in the grace of God, bestowed on the human race through the one mediator between God and humanity, the man Christ Jesus. At their request, and because we too saw that it ought to be done, the book was answered in a treatise by one of us, without naming its author, so that he might not be offended and made harder to heal. In that book of his this view is contained and asserted in many ways and at length. He also argues it in a letter addressed to Your Reverence, where he says that he should not be thought to defend free choice without the grace of God, since he says that the capacity to will and to act, without which we could neither will nor do any good, was implanted in us by nature by the Creator; so that, as he himself teaches, this is to be understood as the grace of God, which is common to pagans and Christians, to the ungodly and the godly, to unbelievers and believers.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pelagius, Nat. (Pelagius, On Nature): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 186 is from Augustine and Alypius to Paulinus of Nola (AD 417); the address is not printed at the head of the digital text. 'One mediator … the man Christ Jesus' is 1 Tim 2:5. The answering treatise is Augustine's On Nature and Grace, replying to Pelagius's On Nature.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.1 (CSEL 57:45–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-1).

## Letter 186.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-2
- Source: CSEL 57:46–47
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains how the African councils of Carthage and Milevis and a private letter brought the case of Pelagius before Pope Innocent, who replied fittingly.

### Latin text

Haec mala, quibus saluatoris euacuaretur aduentus. ubi hoc possumus dicere, quod de lege dicit apostolus: Si per naturam iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est, refellebamus, ut poteramus, in cordibus eorum, qui ista sentirent, ut his cognitis etiam ille, si fieri posset, non lacessitus ista emendaret atque ita et pernicies destrueretur erroris et hominis uerecundiae parceretur. sed posteaquam ad nos litterae de oriente uenerunt eandem causam apertissime uentilantes, nullo modo iam qualicumque episcopali auctoritate deesse ecclesiae debueramus. missae sunt itaque de hac re ex duobus conciliis, Carthaginensi et Mileuitano, relationes ad apostolicam sedem, antequam gesta ecclesiastica, quibus apud episcopos prouinciae Palaestinae Pelagius perhibetur esse purgatus, uel in manus nostras uel in Africam peruenissent. scripsimus etiam ad beatissimae memoriae papam Innocentium praeter conciliorum relationes litteras familiares, ubi de ipsa causa aliquanto diutius egimus. ad omnia nobis ille rescripsit eo modo, quo fas erat atque oportebat apostolicae sedis antistitem.

### English translation (Claude)

These evils, by which the Saviour's coming would be made void (so that we could say of them what the apostle says of the law, 'If righteousness is by nature, then Christ died for nothing'), we refuted as best we could in the hearts of those who held such views, so that when he learned of this he too might, if possible, correct these things without being provoked, and so the destructive error might be destroyed and the man's sense of shame spared. But after letters reached us from the East discussing the same matter quite openly, we could no longer in any way fail the Church with whatever episcopal authority we have. Reports on this matter were therefore sent to the apostolic see from two councils, of Carthage and of Milevis, before the church proceedings in which Pelagius is said to have been cleared before the bishops of the province of Palestine had reached either our hands or Africa. Besides the councils' reports we also wrote a personal letter to Pope Innocent of most blessed memory, in which we dealt with the case at somewhat greater length. To all of these he wrote back to us in the manner that was right and fitting for the bishop of the apostolic see.

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 2:21 is adapted: Paul wrote 'through the law'; Augustine applies it to 'by nature'. The Palestinian proceedings are the Synod of Diospolis (415).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.2 (CSEL 57:46–47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-2).

## Letter 186.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-3
- Source: CSEL 57:47–48
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The papal and conciliar documents show moderation toward persons but a firm suppression of the error, for grace not only forgives sins but enables both the will and the deed of righteousness.

### Latin text

Quae omnia modo legere poteris, si eorum forte ad te uel nulla uel non cuncta peruenerant. ubi uidebis seruata erga homines moderatione, quae debuit, ne damnarentur. si praua damnarent, ipsum tamen nouellum et perniciosum errorem sic ecclesiastica auctoritate compressum, ut multum miremur esse adhuc quosdam, qui per quemlibet errorem gratiae dei conentur obsistere — si tamen haec gesta esse didicerunt —, quae gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, quod fides uera et catholica tenet semper ecclesia, pusillos cum magnis a morte primi hominis ad uitam secundi hominis transfert non solum peccata delendo uerum etiam ad non peccandum recteque uiuendum eos, qui iam uti possunt uoluntatis arbitrio, sic adiuuando, ut, nisi adiuuet, nihil pietatis atque iustitiae siue in opere siue etiam in ipsa uoluntate habere possimus: deus quippe operatur in nobis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate.

### English translation (Claude)

You can now read all of these, if perhaps none of them, or not all, had reached you. There you will see that toward the men themselves due moderation was kept, so that they would not be condemned if they condemned the wrong teachings; yet the new and pernicious error itself has been so suppressed by the authority of the Church that we are greatly surprised there are still some who by any error at all try to resist the grace of God (if indeed they have learned of these proceedings). That grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, as the true Catholic faith, which the Church always holds, maintains, carries little ones together with the great from the death of the first man to the life of the second man, not only by blotting out sins but also by helping those who can already use the choice of the will not to sin and to live rightly, in such a way that unless it helps, we can have nothing of godliness and righteousness either in deed or even in the will itself; for 'God works in us both to will and to work, according to his good will.'

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:47: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 2:13. 'First man … second man' echoes 1 Cor 15:45–47.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.3 (CSEL 57:47–48; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-3).

## Letter 186.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-4
- Source: CSEL 57:48–49
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Only Christ distinguishes anyone from the mass of perdition; faith, good will and good works are all received, so works come from grace and not grace from works.

### Latin text

Nam quis nos, nisi qui uenit quaerere et saluare, quod perierat, ab illa perditionis massa et concretione discernit? unde apostolus interrogat dicens: Quis enim te discernit? ubi si dixerit homo: Fides mea, bona uoluntas mea, bonum opus meum respondetur ei: Quid enim habes. quod non accepisti? si autem et accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? hoc utique totum ideo, non ut homo non glorietur, sed ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur, non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur; non quia bona opera ista pia cogitatione frustrantur, cum deus reddat unicuique secundum opera eius sitque gloria et honor et pax omni operanti bonum. sed quia opera ex gratia, non ex operibus gratia, quoniam fides, quae per dilectionem operatur, nihil operaretur, nisi ipsa dilectio dei diffunderetur in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. nec ipsa fides esset in nobis, nisi unicuique deus partiretur mensuram fidei.

### English translation (Claude)

For who distinguishes us from that mass and lump of perdition, except he who came to seek and to save what was lost? Hence the apostle asks, 'For who distinguishes you?' If a man answers, 'My faith, my good will, my good work', the reply is: 'What do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as if you had not received it?' All this is said, not so that a man should not boast, but so that 'he who boasts should boast in the Lord'; 'not by works, so that no one may be lifted up'; not because good works are made void by a pious way of thinking, since God 'renders to each according to his works', and 'glory and honour and peace to everyone who does good'; but because works come from grace, not grace from works. For 'faith, which works through love', would work nothing unless that very love of God were 'poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us'. Nor would faith itself be in us unless God apportioned to each 'the measure of faith'.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 19:10; 1 Cor 4:7; 1 Cor 1:31; Eph 2:9; Rom 2:6, 10; Gal 5:6; Rom 5:5; Rom 12:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.4 (CSEL 57:48–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-4).

## Letter 186.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-5
- Source: CSEL 57:49
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even the resolve to keep one's strength for God, like the prodigal son's turning home, is inspired by God, who is the true guardian.

### Latin text

Bonum est igitur homini, ut cum totis uiribus liberi arbitrii sui ueraciter dicat: Fortitudinem meam ad te custodiam, quia ille, qui putauit sine ipsius adiutorio se posse custodire, quod dedit, profectus in longinqua et uiuens prodige cuncta consumpsit et miseria durae seruitutis adtritus reuersusque in semet ipsum dixit: Surgam et ibo ad patrem meum: quam cogitationem bonam quando haberet, nisi et ipsam illi in occulto pater misericordissimus inspirasset? quod intellegens minister ille noui testamenti: Non quia idonei sumus, inquit, cogitare aliquid quasi ex nobismet ipsis, sed sufficientia nostra ex deo est. unde et ille cum dixisset: Fortitudinem meam ad te custodiam, ne uel hoc ipsum, quia custodit, suis uiribus adrogaret, tamquam ei uenisset in mentem, quia, nisi dominus custodierit ciuitatem, in uanum uigilant, qui custodiunt, et non dormit neque dormitat, qui custodit, adiunxit causam, unde fiat idoneus custodire uel quo potius custode seruetur: Quoniam, deus, inquit, susceptor meus es.

### English translation (Claude)

It is good, then, for a man to say truthfully with all the strength of his free choice: 'I will keep my strength for you.' For the one who thought he could keep what the Father gave without his help set out into a far country, lived prodigally and squandered everything; and worn down by the misery of hard servitude, he came back to himself and said, 'I will arise and go to my father.' When would he have had this good thought unless the most merciful Father had secretly inspired it in him? Understanding this, that minister of the new covenant says: 'Not that we are sufficient to think anything as from ourselves, but our sufficiency is from God.' Hence the psalmist too, having said, 'I will keep my strength for you', lest he claim even the keeping as due to his own strength (as if it had come into his mind that 'unless the Lord guards the city, those who guard it keep watch in vain', and that 'he who guards does not sleep or slumber'), added the reason why he is able to keep it, or rather by what guardian he is kept: 'For you, O God, are my protector.'

### Scripture references

- Ps 59:9 (58:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 15:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 127:1 (126:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 121:4 (120:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 59:9 (58:10 LXX/Vulg.); Luke 15:13–18; 2 Cor 3:5–6; Ps 127:1 (126:1); Ps 121:4 (120:4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.5 (CSEL 57:49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-5).

## Letter 186.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-6
- Source: CSEL 57:49–50
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Before grace no one has good merits, only sins; grace is given freely, not paid as a debt, which is why it is called grace.

### Latin text

Recolat igitur iste, si potest, merita sua, unde factum sit, ut deus dignaretur eius esse susceptor, ac si deus esset susceptus; recolat, utrum quaesierit, an quaesitus sit ab illo scilicet, qui uenit quaerere et saluare, quod perierat. nam si quaerere uoluerit, ante gratiam quid meruerit, ut acciperet eam, mala sua poterit homo inuenire, non bona, etiam si eum unius diei uitam habentem super terram gratia saluatoris inuenerit, quia, si aliquid boni operatur homo, ut gratiam mereatur, non ei merces inputatur secundum gratiam sed secundum debitum. si autem credit in eum. qui iustificat impium, ut deputetur fides eius ad iustitiam - iustus enim ex fide uiuit —, profecto antequam gratia iustificetur, hoc est iustus efficiatur, impius quid est nisi impius? quem si debitum sequeretur, quid eius merito nisi supplicium redderetur? si ergo gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia; operibus enim debitum redditur, gratia gratis datur, unde etiam nuncupatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let this man, then, recall his merits, if he can: what caused God to deign to be his protector, as though God had been taken up by him; let him recall whether he sought, or was sought by him who came to seek and to save what was lost. For if he wishes to look for what he deserved before grace, so as to receive it, a man will be able to find his evil deeds, not good ones, even if the Saviour's grace found him having lived but a single day on earth. For if a man does some good in order to merit grace, the reward is reckoned to him not as grace but as debt. But if he believes in him who justifies the ungodly, so that his faith is counted as righteousness (for 'the righteous shall live by faith'), then surely, before he is justified by grace, that is, made righteous, what is the ungodly man but ungodly? If what is owed followed him, what would be rendered to his deserts but punishment? 'If, then, it is by grace, it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.' To works what is owed is paid; grace is given gratis, which is why it is so named.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:4: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 'Susceptor' (protector) puns on 'susceptus' (taken up). Luke 19:10; Rom 4:4–5; Hab 2:4 / Rom 1:17; Rom 11:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.6 (CSEL 57:49–50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-6).

## Letter 186.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-7
- Source: CSEL 57:50–51
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith may be said to obtain grace, but only because it obtains love, which is itself God's gift; God works all good in the elect, including their love for him.

### Latin text

Si quis autem dixerit, quod gratiam bene operandi fides mereatur, negare non possumus, immo uero gratissime confitemur. hanc enim fidem nolumus habeant, qua impetrent caritatem, quae sola uere bene operatur, isti fratres nostri. qui multum de suis operibus gloriantur; caritas autem usque adeo donum dei est, ut deus dicatur. qui ergo habent fidem, qua impetrent iustificationem, per dei gratiam peruenerunt ad legem iustitiae, unde dicitur: Tempore acceptabili exaudiui te et in die salutis adiuui te. proinde in his, qui per electionem gratiae salui fiunt, adiutor deus operatur et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate, quoniam diligentibus deum omnia cooperatur in bonum; si omnia, utique et ipsam dilectionem, quam fide impetramus, ut eum, qui nos prior dilexit, ut in illum crederemus, per eius gratiam diligamus et diligendo bene operemur, quod operati non sumus, ut diligeremur.

### English translation (Claude)

But if anyone says that faith merits the grace of doing good, we cannot deny it; indeed we confess it most gladly. For this is the faith we wish these brothers of ours, who boast much of their works, to have: the faith by which they may obtain love, which alone truly does good. And love is so much the gift of God that God is called love. Those, then, who have the faith by which they obtain justification have come by God's grace to the law of righteousness; hence it is said, 'At an acceptable time I heard you, and on the day of salvation I helped you.' Accordingly, in those who are saved by the election of grace, God as helper works both to will and to work according to his good will, since for those who love God all things work together for good. If all things, then surely love itself too, which we obtain by faith, so that by his grace we may love him who first loved us so that we might believe in him, and by loving may do good, which we had not done in order to be loved.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:5: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:19: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 4:8, 16; Isa 49:8 / 2 Cor 6:2; Rom 11:5; Phil 2:13; Rom 8:28; 1 John 4:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.7 (CSEL 57:50–51; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-7).

## Letter 186.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-8
- Source: CSEL 57:51–52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who claim merit by their own will repeat carnal Israel's error of seeking righteousness by works, whereas true righteousness comes from God through faith.

### Latin text

Hi uero, qui suis meritis praemia tamquam debita expectant nec ipsa merita dei gratiae tribuunt sed uiribus propriae uoluntatis, sicut dictum est de carnali Israhel, persequentes legem iustitiae in legem non perueniunt. quare? quia non ex fide sed tamquam ex operibus. ipsa est enim iustitia ex fide, quam gentes adprehenderunt, de quibus dictum est: Quid ergo dicemus? quia gentes, quae non cognouerunt iustitiam, adprehenderunt iustitiam, iustitiam autem, quae ex fide est. Israhel autem persequens legem iustitiae in legem non peruenit. quare? quia non ex fide sed tamquam ex operibus. offenderunt in lapidem offensionis, sicut scriptum est: Ecce pono in Sion lapidem offensionis et petram scandali et, qui crediderit in eum, non confundetur. ipsa est iustitia ex fide, qua credimus nos iustificari, hoc est iustos fieri gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, ut inueniamur in illo non habentes nostram iustitiam. quae ex lege est, sed eam, quae est per fidem Christi, quae ex deo iustitia in fide, utique in fide. qua credimus nobis iustitiam diuinitus dari, non a nobis in nobis nostris uiribus fieri.

### English translation (Claude)

But those who expect rewards as owed to their merits, and attribute those merits not to God's grace but to the powers of their own will, are like what was said of carnal Israel: pursuing the law of righteousness, they do not attain to the law. Why? Because they pursue it not by faith but as if by works. For that is the righteousness from faith which the Gentiles took hold of, of whom it is said: 'What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not know righteousness, took hold of righteousness, but the righteousness that is by faith; whereas Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, did not attain to the law. Why? Because it was not by faith but as if by works. They stumbled over the stone of stumbling, as it is written: Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence, and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.' That is the righteousness from faith, by which we believe that we are justified, that is, made righteous, by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, 'so that we may be found in him not having our own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God in faith', in faith, that is, by which we believe that righteousness is given to us from God, not produced in us by ourselves through our own powers.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:30: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:31: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:33: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 28:16: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:30–33 (quoting Isa 28:16 and 8:14); Phil 3:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.8 (CSEL 57:51–52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-8).

## Letter 186.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-9
- Source: CSEL 57:52
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The righteousness of the law is called a man's own because the law commands without helping, while the righteousness of God is given through faith in Christ.

### Latin text

Nam cur illam iustitiam, quae ex lege est, suam dixit apostolus, non ei deo? quasi lex non sit ex deo? quis hoc nisi impius senserit? sed quia lex per litteram iubet, non per spiritum iuuat. quicumque sic audit litteram legis. ut ei sufficere uideatur cognouisse, quid iubeat aut prohibeat, atque id se arbitrii sui uirtute impleturum esse confidat nec fide confugiat adiuuandus ad spiritum uiuificantem, ne reum factum littera occidat, is profecto zelum dei habet sed non secundum scientiam. ignorans enim dei iustitiam, id est eam, quae datur ex deo, et suam uolens constituere, ut tantum modo ex lege sit. iustitiae dei non est subiectus; finis enim legis Christus ad iustitiam omni credenti, sicut idem apostolus dicit, ut nos simus iustitia dei in ipso. iustificati igitur ex fide pacem habeamus ad deum per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, iustificati autem gratis per gratiam ipsius, nec fides ipsa superba sit.

### English translation (Claude)

Why did the apostle call the righteousness that is from the law his own and not God's? As if the law were not from God! Who but an ungodly man would think that? It is because the law commands by the letter; it does not help by the Spirit. Whoever hears the letter of the law in such a way that it seems enough to him to know what it commands or forbids, and trusts that he will fulfil it by the strength of his own choice, and does not take refuge by faith in the life-giving Spirit to be helped, so that the letter may not kill him once he is guilty, certainly has a zeal for God but not according to knowledge. For not knowing the righteousness of God, that is, the righteousness that is given from God, and wishing to establish his own, so that it is only from the law, he has not submitted to the righteousness of God. 'For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes', as the same apostle says, 'so that we might become the righteousness of God in him'. 'Therefore, being justified by faith, let us have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ', justified freely by his grace. Nor should faith itself be proud.

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:9: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:4: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 3:9; 2 Cor 3:6; Rom 10:2–4; 2 Cor 5:21; Rom 5:1; Rom 3:24. The digital text reads 'non ei deo', translated by sense as 'not God's'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.9 (CSEL 57:52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-9).

## Letter 186.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-10
- Source: CSEL 57:52–54
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: No human merit precedes grace; grace itself merits increase and perfection, and even man's merit is God's free gift.

### Latin text

nec dicat sibi: Si ex fide, quo modo gratis? quod enim fides meretur, cur non potius redditur, quam donatur? non dicat ista homo fidelis. quia, cum dixerit: Ut merear iustificationem, habeo fidem, respondetur ei: Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? cum ergo fides impetrat iustificationem, sicut unicuique deus partitus est etiam ipsius mensuram fidei, non gratiam dei aliquid meriti praecedit humani, sed ipsa gratia meretur augeri, ut aucta mereatur et perfici, comitante non ducente, pedisequa non praeuia uoluntate. unde ille, qui dixit: Fortitudinem meam ad te custodiam: Quoniam, deus, susceptor meus es, tamquam requirens, quibus id meritis fuerit consecutus, nihilque in se inueniens ante gratiam dei: Deus meus, inquit, misericordia eius praeueniet me. quantumcumque. inquit, cogitauero antecedentia merita mea, misericordia eius praeueniet me. proinde ab illo adtributam fortitudinem suam ad illum custodiens eodem seruatore non perdit, quod eodem largitore suscepit. nec ob aliud meretur ampliora nisi pie fideliterque sciendo, a quo sibi bona sunt omnia, et hoc sciendo non ex se ipso, ne uel hoc non sit in eo, quod non sit ex deo. unde optime apostolus: Nos, inquit, non spiritum huius mundi accepimus sed spiritum, qui ex deo est, ut sciamus, quae a deo donata sunt nobis. ac per hoc et ipsum hominis meritum donum est gratuitum nec a patre luminum, a quo descendit omne datum optimum, boni aliquid accipere quisquam meretur nisi accipiendo, quod non meretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it say to itself: 'If it is by faith, how is it freely given? What faith merits, why is it not paid rather than given?' Let the believer not say this; for if he says, 'I have faith in order to merit justification', the answer to him is: 'What do you have that you did not receive?' So when faith obtains justification, as God has apportioned to each the measure even of faith itself, no human merit precedes the grace of God; rather, grace itself merits to be increased, so that, once increased, it may merit to be perfected, with the will accompanying and not leading, following behind and not going before. Hence he who said, 'I will keep my strength for you; for you, O God, are my protector', as though asking by what merits he had obtained this, and finding nothing in himself before the grace of God, said: 'My God, his mercy will go before me.' However much, he says, I think of my preceding merits, his mercy will go before me. So, keeping for him his strength granted by him, he does not lose, with the same keeper, what he received from the same giver. And he merits more for no other reason than by knowing, piously and faithfully, from whom all his good things come, and by knowing this too not from himself, so that not even this should be in him which is not from God. Hence the apostle says excellently: 'We have received not the spirit of this world but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things that have been given to us by God.' And so even a man's merit is a free gift, and no one merits to receive anything good from the Father of lights, from whom every best gift comes down, except by receiving what he does not merit.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 59:9 (58:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 59:10 (58:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 4:7; Rom 12:3; Ps 59:9–10 (58:10–11 LXX/Vulg.); 1 Cor 2:12; Jas 1:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.10 (CSEL 57:52–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-10).

## Letter 186.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-11
- Source: CSEL 57:54
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The grace given to infants in baptism is plainly free, since it precedes any will of theirs and is even given to those who resist.

### Latin text

Multum est autem indulgentius et sine ulla dubitatione gratuitum, quod dei gratia per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum praestatur infantibus, ut eis non obsit ex Adam generatio et prosit in Christo regeneratio, in quibus et ipsum accipiendi sensum tanto ante misericordia dei praeuenit. qui certe si in hac paruula aetate de corpore exierint, uitam aeternam regnumque caelorum scientes accipiunt eius muneris merito, quod hic, cum utique profuit, nescierunt. certe in his posteriorum donorum merita nonnisi priora sunt dona. in quibus dandis dei gratia sic operatur. ut nec uoluntas accipientium uel praemittatur uel adiungatur uel subsequatur. quando quidem tantum beneficium non solum non libentibus uerum etiam reluctantibus datur, quod eis ad magnum inputaretur sacrilegium. si iam in his aliquid ualeret uoluntatis arbitrium

### English translation (Claude)

Much more indulgent, and beyond all doubt free, is what the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord grants to infants: that their birth from Adam may not harm them and their rebirth in Christ may benefit them. In them God's mercy comes so long beforehand that it precedes even their capacity to receive it. Certainly, if they leave the body at this tender age, they receive eternal life and the kingdom of heaven knowingly, by the merit of a gift that they did not know of here when it benefited them. Certainly in them the merits of later gifts are nothing but earlier gifts. In giving these the grace of God so works that the will of those receiving is neither put before nor joined to nor made to follow; for so great a benefit is given not only to the unwilling but even to the resisting, which would be counted to them as great sacrilege if the choice of the will already had any force in them.

### Translation notes

- The reference is to infant baptism; 'resisting' refers to infants crying at the rite.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.11 (CSEL 57:54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-11).

## Letter 186.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-12
- Source: CSEL 57:54–56
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Infants are born under the punishment owed to Adam's sin; God's distinguishing among them by grace is inscrutable but never unjust.

### Latin text

Hoc diximus propter eos, qui non ualentes in causa gratiae inscrutabilia dei iudicia perscrutari,. cur ex Adam massa. quae profecto ex uno in condemnationem tota conlapsa est. illud uas faciat in honorem illud in contumeliam, tamen audent paruulos reos propriorum constituere peccatorum, ut, qui bona malaue cogitare non possunt, putentur per liberum arbitrium uel poenam mereri posse uel gratiam, cum potius apostolica ueritas dicendo: Ex uno omnes in condemnationem, satis ostendat, quod nascantur in poena, ut non merito sed misericordia renascantur in gratia. alioquin gratia iam non est gratia, si non diuinis opibus gratis datur, sed humanis meritis redditur. quae sola sic discernit a poena, ut, cum poena sit ex Adam omnibus debita, gratia uero per unum Iesum Christum nulli debita sed gratuita, ut uera sit gratia, inscrutabilia iudicia dei tamquam deus esse possint, cur paruulos ipse discernat, quos merita nulla discernunt, sed iniqua esse non possint, quia uniuersae uiae domini misericordia et ueritas. unde cum praebetur alteri misericordia gratiae, non habet. quare de humano merito glorietur, quoniam non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur; cum uero alteri uindictae redditur ueritas. non habet, cur iuste queratur; id enim redditur, quod peccato iure debetur, quoniam unus, in quo omnes peccauerunt, non utique inique etiam in singulis quibusque punitur. in quorum poena clarius ostenditur, quid uasis misericordiae per non debitam sed ueram gratiam, - hoc est gratuitam conferatur.

### English translation (Claude)

We have said this because of those who, being unable in the question of grace to search out God's unsearchable judgments (why, from the lump of Adam, which has wholly collapsed from one man into condemnation, he makes one vessel for honour and another for dishonour), nevertheless dare to make little children guilty of their own sins, so that those who cannot think good or evil are thought able, by free choice, to merit either punishment or grace. Yet the apostolic truth, by saying 'From one, all to condemnation', shows clearly enough that they are born in punishment, so that they may be reborn in grace not by merit but by mercy. Otherwise grace is no longer grace, if it is not given freely from divine riches but paid back to human merits. Grace alone so distinguishes from punishment that, since punishment is owed to all from Adam, while grace through the one Jesus Christ is owed to none but is free, so as to be true grace, the judgments of God can be as deep as God is, as to why he distinguishes among little children whom no merits distinguish, but they cannot be unjust, because 'all the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth'. Hence when the mercy of grace is shown to one, he has no reason to boast of human merit, 'since it is not by works, so that no one may be lifted up'; and when the truth of retribution is rendered to another, he has no reason to complain justly, for what is rendered is what is rightly owed to sin, since the one in whom all sinned is not unjustly punished in each individual too. In their punishment it is shown more clearly what is conferred on the vessels of mercy through grace that is not owed but true, that is, free.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:33; Rom 9:21; Rom 5:16, 18; Rom 11:6; Ps 25:10 (24:10); Eph 2:9; Rom 5:12; Rom 9:23. The phrase 'tamquam deus esse possint' is unclear in the digital text; translated by sense ('as deep as God is').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.12 (CSEL 57:54–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-12).

## Letter 186.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-13
- Source: CSEL 57:56
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians argue from Esau and Jacob struggling in the womb that infants have free choice and personal sins.

### Latin text

Unde autem argumententur aduersus apostolum apertissime dicentem: Per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, dicentes etiam paruulos propria per liberum arbitrium habere peccata. taedet adtendere pigetque proferre, sed magis compellimur dicere. quod enim potuerunt magna et acuta ingenia cogitare, aut inopiae est tacendo uitare aut arrogantiae contemnendo praeterire. Ecce, inquiunt, Esau et Iacob intra uiscera materna luctantur et, dum nascuntur, alter supplantatur ab altero atque in pede praecedentis manu consequentis et tenentis inuenta perseuerans quodam modo lucta conuincitur. quo modo ergo in infantibus haec agentibus nullum est uel ad bonum uel ad malum propriae uoluntatis arbitrium, unde praemia siue supplicia meritis praecedentibus subsequantur?)

### English translation (Claude)

But how they argue against the apostle, who says most plainly, 'Through one man sin entered the world, and through sin death, and so it passed to all men, in whom all sinned', saying that even little children have their own sins through free choice, is wearisome to consider and distasteful to set out; but we are compelled to speak of it. For what great and sharp minds have been able to think up, it is either a lack of resources to avoid by silence, or arrogance to pass over with contempt. 'Look,' they say, 'Esau and Jacob wrestle within their mother's womb; and as they are born, one is supplanted by the other, and by the hand of the one following being found holding the foot of the one going first, the struggle, persisting in some way, is proved. How then can there be in infants who do such things no choice of their own will for good or evil, on which rewards or punishments might follow according to preceding merits?'

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 25:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 25:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:12 in the Latin form 'in quo omnes peccauerunt'; Gen 25:22–26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.13 (CSEL 57:56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-13).

## Letter 186.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-14
- Source: CSEL 57:56–57
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The twins' struggle was a portent, not an act of choice, as Paul shows by citing them as proof of grace given before any works.

### Latin text

Ad hoc nos dicimus ideo motus illos et tamquam litigium paruulorum signum rerum fuisse magnarum, quia non fuit arbitrium sed prodigium. neque enim daturi sumus et asinis liberum potestatis arbitrium, quoniam huius generis iumentum, sicut scriptum est, subiugale sine uoce in hominis uoce respondens uetuit prophetae dementiam. hi autem. qui tales non prodigiosos motus sed uoluntarios actus nec de paruulis sed a paruulis factos esse contendunt, quid apostolo responsuri sunt. qui. cum et hos geminos ad documentum gratuitae gratiae commemorandos uideret: Nondum enim natis, inquit, nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali, ut secundum electionem dei maneret, non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum est, quia maior seruiet minori? deinde adiungens testimonium prophetae longe post quidem ista dicentis sed tamen de hac re antiquum dei consilium declarantis: Sicut scriptum est, inquit, Iacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui.

### English translation (Claude)

To this we say that those movements and, as it were, the quarrel of the little ones were a sign of great things, because it was not choice but portent. For we are not going to grant free power of choice to asses as well, since a beast of this kind, as it is written, a voiceless beast of burden answering with a human voice, restrained the madness of the prophet. But those who contend that these were not portentous movements but voluntary acts, and done not in the little ones but by the little ones, what will they answer the apostle? For seeing that these twins too were to be mentioned as a proof of free grace, he says: 'Though they were not yet born and had done nothing good or evil, so that God's purpose according to election might stand, not from works but from him who calls, it was said that the elder will serve the younger.' Then he adds the testimony of the prophet, spoken long afterwards indeed, but declaring God's ancient counsel on this matter: 'As it is written,' he says, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.'

### Scripture references

- 2 Pet 2:16: quotation, high confidence
- Num 22:28: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 25:23: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Pet 2:16 (Num 22:28); Rom 9:11–13 (quoting Gen 25:23 and Mal 1:2–3).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.14 (CSEL 57:56–57; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-14).

## Letter 186.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-15
- Source: CSEL 57:57–58
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's point about the unborn twins is that election is of grace, which makes people worthy rather than finding them so.

### Latin text

Nempe doctor gentium in fide et ueritate istos geminos nondum natos nihil boni aut mali egisse testatur, ut gratia commendetur, ut, quod dictum est: Maior seruiet minori, non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum intellegatur, ut secundum electionem propositum dei maneret, non meritum hominis anteiret. non enim dicit electionem uoluntatis humanae siue naturae, cum par esset in utroque mortis damnationisque condicio, sed electionem procul dubio gratiae, quae non inuenit eligendos, sed facit, de qua et in consequentibus eiusdem epistulae loquens ait: Sic ergo et in hoc tempore reliquiae per electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia. cui loco satis locus iste concordat, ubi commemoratur non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum: Maior seruiet minori. ut quid ergo praeclarissimo gratiae commendatori de infantum libero arbitrio et nondum natorum actibus tam inpudenter resistitur? cur meritis praeueniri gratia perhibetur, quae gratia non esset, si secundum meritum inputaretur? cur contra salutem, quae missa est perditis, quae uenit indignis. quamlibet acuta, quamlibet copiosa et ornata, mirum tamen si Christiana disputatione contenditur?.

### English translation (Claude)

The teacher of the Gentiles, in faith and truth, testifies that these twins, not yet born, had done nothing good or evil, so that grace might be commended: so that the saying 'The elder will serve the younger' might be understood to have been said not from works but from him who calls, so that God's purpose according to election might stand, and no human merit might come first. For he does not speak of an election of human will or nature, since the condition of death and condemnation was equal in both, but beyond doubt of an election of grace, which does not find people fit to be chosen but makes them so. Speaking of it later in the same letter he says: 'So too at the present time a remnant has been saved by the election of grace. But if by grace, it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.' This passage agrees well with the one in which it is recalled that 'the elder will serve the younger' was said not from works but from him who calls. Why then is this most illustrious commender of grace so shamelessly resisted with talk of the free choice of infants and the acts of the unborn? Why is grace said to be preceded by merits, when it would not be grace if it were reckoned according to merit? Why is there contention against the salvation that was sent to the lost and came to the unworthy, by argument however sharp, however copious and ornate, but hardly Christian?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:11: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:11–12; Rom 11:5–6. 'Teacher of the Gentiles' is 1 Tim 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.15 (CSEL 57:57–58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-15).

## Letter 186.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-16
- Source: CSEL 57:58–59
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's answer to the charge of injustice is God's word to Moses: to free anyone from the deserved mass of death is mercy, and to punish the equally guilty is not injustice.

### Latin text

Sed quo modo, inquit, non est iniquitas apud deum. si a diligendo discernit, quos merita operum nulla discernunt? ita nobis hoc dicitur, tamquam id apostolus ipse non uiderit, non proposuerit, non responderit. uidit utique, quid his auditis humana posset infirmitas uel ignorantia cogitare. et eandem quaestionem sibi ipse proponens: Quid ergo dicemus inquit; numquid iniquitas est apud deum? continuo respondit: Absit. rationemque reddens, cur absit, id est cur non sit iniquitas apud deum, non ait: Merita enim uel opera iudicat etiam paruulorum, etiamsi adhuc sint in materno utero constituti — quo modo enim hoc diceret, qui iam dixerat de nondum natis et de his, qui nihil adhuc egerint boni aut mali, quod non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum sit: Maior seruiet minori? — sed cum uellet ostendere, cur in his non sit iniquitas apud deum: Moysi enim dicit, inquit: Miserebor, cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo, cui misericors fuero. quid nos hic docuit nisi ex illa massa primi hominis, cui merito mors debetur, non ad merita hominum sed ad dei misericordiam pertinere quod quisque liberatur. atque ita non esse iniquitatem apud deum, quia neque remittendo neque exigendo. quod debetur, iniustus est? ibi enim grata est indulgentia. ubi iusta posset esse uindicta. et hinc euidentius apparet, a poena debita liberato et gratis iustificato quantum beneficii conferatur, quod alter aequaliter reus sine punientis iniquitate punitur.

### English translation (Claude)

'But how,' someone says, 'is there no injustice with God, if he distinguishes by loving those whom no merits of works distinguish?' This is said to us as if the apostle himself had not seen it, not put it forward, not answered it. He certainly saw what human weakness or ignorance might think on hearing these things; and putting the same question to himself he says, 'What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God?' He answered at once: 'By no means.' And giving the reason why not, that is, why there is no injustice with God, he did not say, 'For he judges the merits or works even of little ones, even while they are still in their mother's womb' (how could he say this, who had already said of those not yet born, who had done nothing good or evil, that 'the elder will serve the younger' was said not from works but from him who calls?), but wishing to show why there is no injustice with God in their case, he says: 'For he says to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show compassion to whom I have been compassionate.' What did he teach us here, except that it belongs not to human merits but to God's mercy that anyone is set free from that mass of the first man to which death is deservedly owed; and so there is no injustice with God, because he is unjust neither in remitting nor in exacting what is owed? For pardon is welcome where punishment could have been just. And from this it appears more clearly how great a benefit is conferred on the one set free from the punishment owed and justified freely, when another, equally guilty, is punished without injustice on the part of the one who punishes.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:14–15 (Exod 33:19); Rom 9:11–12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.16 (CSEL 57:58–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-16).

## Letter 186.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-17
- Source: CSEL 57:59
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul adds that salvation depends on God's mercy and that God uses even Pharaoh's hardening, acting in both by mercy and truth.

### Latin text

Denique subiungit et dicit: Igitur non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei. hoc propter eos dictum est, qui per gratiam liberati iustificantur. propter eos autem, super quos ira dei manet. quia et ipsis deus bene utitur ad docendos alios, quos liberare dignatur. subiunxit atque ait: Dicit enim scriptura Pharaoni, quia ad hoc te excitaui. ut ostendam in te potentiam meam et ut adnuntietur nomen meum in uniuersa terra. deinde ad utrumque concludens: Ergo, inquit, cuius uult, miseretur et, quem uult, obdurat, profecto neutrum aliqua iniquitate sed utrumque misericordia et ueritate. et adhuc tamen audax mouetur infirmitas eorum scilicet, qui secundum coniecturas cordis humani inscrutabilem altitudinem iudiciorum dei cogitare conantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Then he adds: 'So it depends not on the one who wills or the one who runs, but on God who shows mercy.' This was said with regard to those who are set free through grace and justified. But with regard to those on whom the wrath of God remains (for God makes good use of them too, to teach others whom he deigns to set free), he added: 'For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, For this very purpose I raised you up, to show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.' Then, concluding to both: 'So then,' he says, 'he has mercy on whom he wills, and he hardens whom he wills', certainly neither by any injustice, but both by mercy and truth. And yet the bold weakness of those who try to reckon the unsearchable depth of God's judgments by the guesses of the human heart is still stirred.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:17: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:36: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:16–18 (Exod 9:16); John 3:36; Rom 11:33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.17 (CSEL 57:59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-17).

## Letter 186.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-18
- Source: CSEL 57:59–60
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's image of the potter shows that since the whole human lump fell into condemnation through Adam's free choice, honour is from mercy and dishonour from just judgment.

### Latin text

Hanc sibi ex aduerso opponens apostolus ait: Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? nobis hoc dictum putemus. quid ergo aliud, quam quod respondit apostolus. respondere debemus? aut si et nos talia mouent, quia et nos homines sumus, simul oportet omnes audiamus. dicentem: o homo, tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? numquid dicit figmentum ei. qui se finxit: Quare me fecisti sic? annon habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa facere aliud uas in honorem aliud in contumeliam? haec massa si esset ita media, ut quem ad modum nihil boni ita nec mali aliquid mereretur, non frustra uideretur iniquitas, ut ei ea fierent uasa in contumeliam; cum uero per liberum arbitrium primi hominis in condemnationem ex uno uniuersa defluxerit, procul dubio, quod ex ea fiunt uasa in honorem, non ipsius iustitiae, quae gratiam nulla praecessit, sed dei misericordiae, quod uero in contumeliam, non iniquitati dei, quae absit ut sit apud deum, sed iudicio deputandum est. hoc quisquis cum ecclesia catholica sapit, non contra gratiam pro meritis disputat, sed misericordiam et iudicium domino cantat, ut nec misericordiam recuset ingratus nec iudicium accuset iniustus.

### English translation (Claude)

Setting this objection against himself the apostle says: 'You will say to me then, Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?' Let us take this as said to us. What else, then, should we answer than what the apostle answered? Or if such things trouble us too, since we too are human, we must all together hear him say: 'O man, who are you to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to the one who formed it, Why have you made me thus? Has the potter no power over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour and another for dishonour?' If this lump were so neutral that, as it merited nothing good, so it merited nothing evil, it would not be without reason that it seemed unjust for vessels for dishonour to be made from it. But since by the free choice of the first man the whole has flowed down from one into condemnation, beyond doubt the fact that vessels for honour are made from it must be credited not to its own righteousness, which did not precede grace, but to the mercy of God; and the fact that vessels for dishonour are made must be credited not to injustice in God (far be it that there should be any in God) but to his judgment. Whoever thinks this with the Catholic Church does not argue for merits against grace, but sings of mercy and judgment to the Lord, so as neither to refuse mercy ungratefully nor to accuse judgment unjustly.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 101:1 (100:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:19–21; Ps 101:1 (100:1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.18 (CSEL 57:59–60; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-18).

## Letter 186.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-19
- Source: CSEL 57:60–61
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The holy lump of Rom 11 descends from Abraham by faith, whereas the lump of Rom 9 is Adam's, wholly under death, from which God makes vessels by mercy or judgment.

### Latin text

Alia est namque illa consparsio, de qua idem dicit apostolus: Si autem delibatio sancta, et consparsio et. si radix sancta, et rami. illa est ex Abraham, non ex Adam, id est ex communione sacramenti et similitudine fidei, non ex propagine mortali; ista uero uel consparsio uel, sicut in plerisque codicibus legitur. massa quoniam tota mortis est. cum per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, misericordia ex illa fit aliud uas in honorem. iudicio autem aliud in contumeliam. neque ibi praecedunt merita gratiam liberantis neque hic effugiunt peccata iustitiam punientis. quod quidem in aetatibus maioribus aduersus contentiosos non tam euidenter apparet, ubi pro meritis hominum qualicumque uelut protecti obscuritate confligunt. sed ideo contra eorum contentionem illos inuenit apostolus, in quibus nondum natis neque agentibus aliquid boni aut mali non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum est: Maior seruiet minori.

### English translation (Claude)

For there is another lump, of which the same apostle says: 'If the first portion is holy, so is the lump; and if the root is holy, so are the branches.' That one is from Abraham, not from Adam, that is, from the fellowship of the sacrament and likeness of faith, not from mortal descent. But this lump (or 'mass', as it reads in most manuscripts), since it is wholly of death (for 'through one man sin entered the world, and through sin death, and so it passed to all men, in whom all sinned'), from it by mercy one vessel is made for honour, and by judgment another for dishonour. Neither do merits there precede the grace of the one who sets free, nor do sins here escape the justice of the one who punishes. This indeed is not so evident in older ages against the contentious, where they fight for human merits as if protected by some obscurity. That is why, against their contention, the apostle found those of whom, not yet born and doing nothing good or evil, it was said, not from works but from him who calls: 'The elder will serve the younger.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:16; Rom 5:12; Rom 9:11–12. Augustine notes that most manuscripts read 'massa' rather than 'consparsio' in Rom 9:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.19 (CSEL 57:60–61; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-19).

## Letter 186.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-20
- Source: CSEL 57:61–62
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Though God's judgments are unsearchable, one must hold that no one is justified by merit and no one is hardened without desert.

### Latin text

Qua in re quoniam nimis alta et inscrutabilia sunt iudicia dei et inuestigabiles uiae eius, interim teneat homo non esse iniquitatem apud deum; sed qua aequitate, cuius uult, misereatur et, quem uult, obduret. se tamquam hominem ignorare fateatur ita sane, ut propter illud, quod inconcussum tenet non esse iniquitatem apud deum, quamuis nemo ab illo iustificetur meritis praecedentibus, neminem tamen obdurari nisi merito nouerit. pie namque et ueraciter creditur deus nocentes atque impios iustificando a poenis debitis liberare; quemquam uero inmeritum et nulli obnoxium peccato si deus damnare creditur, alienus ab iniquitate non creditur. ubi ergo liberatur indignus, tanto maior debetur actio gratiarum, quanto poena iustior debebatur; ubi autem damnatur indignus, nec misericordia nec ueritas obtinetur.

### English translation (Claude)

In this matter, since the judgments of God are exceedingly deep and unsearchable and his ways inscrutable, let a man meanwhile hold that there is no injustice with God; but by what equity he has mercy on whom he wills and hardens whom he wills, let him confess, as a man, that he does not know. Yet let him do so in such a way that, because of what he holds unshaken (that there is no injustice with God), he knows that although no one is justified by him on account of preceding merits, no one is hardened except deservedly. For it is believed piously and truly that God, in justifying the guilty and ungodly, frees them from punishments they owe; but if God were believed to condemn anyone undeserving and liable to no sin, he would not be believed free of injustice. So where the unworthy is set free, the greater thanks are owed, the more just was the punishment that was owed; but if the undeserving were condemned, neither mercy nor truth would be upheld.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:33; Rom 9:14, 18. In the last clause the text reads 'damnatur indignus' ('the undeserving is condemned'), presented by Augustine as an impossible case; translated conditionally for clarity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.20 (CSEL 57:61–62; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-20).

## Letter 186.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-21
- Source: CSEL 57:62
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Esau and Jacob had no works of their own, but both were born guilty in Adam, so the one freed should praise mercy and the one punished not blame judgment.

### Latin text

Quo modo, inquiunt, Esau non damnatur indignus, si non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum est, quia maior seruiet minori? sicut enim illius nulla praecesserant opera bona, ut ad gratiam pertineret, sic nec huius mala, ut ad poenam pertinere deberet. nulla plane in utroque opera uel bona uel mala sed propria, uterque autem illi uni obnoxius erat, in quo omnes peccauerunt, ut omnes in illo morerentur. quicumque enim ex illo uno multi in se ipsis futuri erant, tunc in illo unus erant. proinde illud peccatum solius esset, si ex illo nullus exisset; porro autem, in quo erat natura communis, ab eius uitio est nullus immunis. si ergo ambo, qui nondum propria uel bona uel mala operabantur, rei tamen ex origine nascebantur, laudet misericordiam, qui liberatur, non culpet iudicium, qui punitur.

### English translation (Claude)

'How then,' they say, 'is Esau not condemned undeservedly, if it was said not from works but from him who calls that the elder will serve the younger? For just as no good works of Jacob had gone before to bring him to grace, so no evil works of Esau had gone before by which he should come to punishment.' Clearly there were in neither any works of his own, good or evil; but both were liable to that one man in whom all sinned, so that all died in him. For all the many who were to come from that one man, each in himself, were then one in him. That sin would have been his alone if no one had come from him; but as it is, from the vice of the one in whom the common nature was, no one is immune. If, then, both, who were not yet doing any good or evil of their own, were nevertheless born guilty by origin, let the one who is set free praise mercy, and let the one who is punished not blame judgment.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:12; Rom 5:12; 1 Cor 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.21 (CSEL 57:62; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-21).

## Letter 186.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-22
- Source: CSEL 57:62–63
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To ask why God did not save both twins is like asking why he did not make more of every creature; God alone knows the proper number.

### Latin text

Hic si dixerimus: Quanto melius ambo liberarentur! nihil nobis conuenientius dicetur quam: o homo, tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? nouit quippe ille, quid agat et quantus numerus esse debeat primitus omnium hominum deinde sanctorum sicut siderum. sicut angelorum atque. ut de terrenis loquamur, sicut pecorum. piscium. uolatilium. sicut arborum et herbarum, sicut denique foliorum capillorumque nostrorum. nam nos humana cogitatione adhuc possumus dicere: Quoniam bona sunt cuncta ista. quae fecit. quanto melius illa duplicasset uel multiplicasset, ut multo essent plura quam sunt! si enim non ea caperet mundus. numquid non posset etiam ipsum facere, quantum uellet. ampliorem? et tamen quantumcumque faceret uel illa plura uel istum capaciorem atque maiorem. nihilo minus eadem de multiplicandis eis dici possent et nullus esset inmoderatis modus.

### English translation (Claude)

If at this point we say, 'How much better if both were set free!', nothing could be said to us more fittingly than: 'O man, who are you to answer back to God?' For he knows what he is doing and how great the number ought to be, first of all human beings, then of the saints, as of the stars, as of the angels, and, to speak of earthly things, as of cattle, fish and birds, as of trees and plants, and finally as of leaves and of our hairs. For we, by human reasoning, could still say: 'Since all these things that he made are good, how much better if he had doubled or multiplied them, so that they were far more than they are!' For if the world could not hold them, could he not make the world itself as much larger as he wished? And yet however much he made, whether more of those things or this world more capacious and larger, the same could still be said about multiplying them, and there would be no limit to the limitless.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:31: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:20; Gen 1:31 (echo).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.22 (CSEL 57:62–63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-22).

## Letter 186.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-23
- Source: CSEL 57:63–64
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even those who put free choice first must face why God created those he foreknew would be damned; the only answer is Paul's image of the potter.

### Latin text

Etenim etiam illud dici potest: siue sit gratia. qua iustificantur iniusti. de qua nobis dubitare fas non est. siue. ut quidam nolunt. semper praecedat, liberum arbitrium. cuius meritum sequatur uel poena uel praemium, cur omnino creati sunt, quod deus ita peccaturos, ut aeterno essent igne damnandi, sine dubitatione praesciuit? quamuis enim peccata non fecerit, naturas tamen ipsas. quae per se ipsae sine dubio bonae sunt, in quibus tamen ex arbitrio uoluntatis futura essent uitia peccatorum et in multis talia, quibus esset aeterna poena reddenda, quis nisi deus creauit? quare. nisi quia uoluit? quare autem uoluerit, o homo. tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? numquid dicit figmentum ei. qui se finxit: Quare sic me fecisti? annon habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem consparsione facere aliud quidem uas in honorem aliud autem in contumeliam?

### English translation (Claude)

For this too can be said: whether it is grace by which the unrighteous are justified (which we may not doubt), or whether, as some would have it, free choice always comes first, on whose merit either punishment or reward follows, why were they created at all, when God foreknew without doubt that they would sin in such a way as to be condemned to eternal fire? For although he did not make their sins, yet who but God created the natures themselves, which in themselves are without doubt good, but in which the vices of sins were to arise from the choice of the will, and in many of them such sins as eternal punishment would have to be paid for? Why, if not because he willed it? But as for why he willed it: 'O man, who are you to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to the one who formed it, Why have you made me thus? Has the potter no power over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour and another for dishonour?'

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:20–21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.23 (CSEL 57:63–64; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/185-50/#p-186-23).

## Letter 186.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-24
- Source: CSEL 57:64–65
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul gives the reason: God shows his wrath on vessels of wrath so that the vessels of mercy may humbly recognize that they too deserved the same.

### Latin text

Atque ut iam dicamus, quod sequitur: Si autem uolens deus ostendere iram et demonstrare potentiam suam pertulit in multa patientia uasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem, et ut notas faceret diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae, ecce etiam ratio reddita est homini, quanta debuit homini — si tamen uel istam capit, qui pro sui arbitrii libertate in tantae infirmitatis seruitute contendit —, ecce dictae sunt causae. tu ergo quis es, qui respondeas deo, si uolens deus ostendere iram et demonstrare potentiam suam, quod et malis bene uti optimus possit, malis dum taxat non condicione diuina sed uitiata uoluntatis iniquitate natura, quae a deo conditore condita est bona, pertulit in multa patientia uasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem, non quod illi essent necessaria siue angelica siue humana peccata, cui nec iustitia creaturae cuiusquam est necessaria, sed ut notas faceret diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae, ne se in bonis operibus tamquam de propriis extollerent uiribus, sed humiliter intellegerent, nisi illis dei gratia non debita sed gratuita subueniret, id fuisse reddendum meritis suis, quod aliis in eadem massa redditum cernerent?

### English translation (Claude)

And now let us say what follows: 'What if God, wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction, and that he might make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy?' See, a reason has been given to man, as much as was owed to man (if indeed even this is grasped by one who argues for the freedom of his choice while in the servitude of such great weakness); see, the causes have been stated. Who then are you to answer back to God, if God, wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, in that the supremely good can make good use even of the evil (evil, that is, not by divine making but by a nature that, created good by God the Creator, has been vitiated by the iniquity of the will), endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction (not because the sins of angels or of men were necessary to him, who needs not even the righteousness of any creature), but that he might make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy, so that they might not exalt themselves in good works as if by their own powers, but might humbly understand that, unless God's grace, not owed but free, came to their aid, what they saw paid to others in the same mass would have had to be paid to their own deserts?

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:22–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.24 (CSEL 57:64–65; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-24).

## Letter 186.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-25
- Source: CSEL 57:65–66
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The number of the saints is fixed in God's foreknowledge; called according to purpose, justified and glorified, they are saved by the election of grace.

### Latin text

Certus est ergo et in dei praescientia praefinitus numerus ac multitudo sanctorum, quibus diligentibus deum, quod eis donauit per diffusum in cordibus eorum spiritum sanctum, omnia cooperantur in bonum, his qui secundum propositum uocati sunt. quoniam, quos ante praesciuit, et praedestinauit conformes fieri imaginis filii sui, ut sit ipse primogenitus in multis fratribus; quos autem praedestinauit, illos et uocauit. hic subaudire debemus secundum propositum. sunt enim et alii uocati sed non electi ac per hoc non secundum propositum uocati. quos autem uocauit - hoc est secundum propositum -, illos et iustificauit; quos autem iustificauit, illos et glorificauit. hi sunt filii promissionis, hi sunt electi, qui per electionem gratiae salui fiunt, ubi dictum est: Si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia. haec sunt uasa misericordiae, in quibus deus etiam per uasa irae notas facit diuitias gloriae suae. horum fit per spiritum sanctum cor unum et anima una, quae benedicit dominum et non obliuiscitur omnes retributiones eius, qui propitius fit omnibus iniquitatibus eius, qui sanat omnes languores eius, qui redimit de corruptione uitam eius, qui coronat eam in miseratione et misericordia, quia non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Certain, then, and predetermined in God's foreknowledge is the number and multitude of the saints, for whom, loving God (which he has given them through the Holy Spirit poured into their hearts), all things work together for good, for those who are called according to purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, so that he might be the firstborn among many brothers; and those whom he predestined he also called (here we must understand 'according to purpose', for there are others called but not chosen, and therefore not called according to purpose); and those whom he called (that is, according to purpose) he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified. These are the children of the promise; these are the elect, who are saved by the election of grace, of which it is said, 'But if by grace, it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.' These are the vessels of mercy, in whom God makes known the riches of his glory even through the vessels of wrath. Through the Holy Spirit they become one heart and one soul, which blesses the Lord and does not forget all his benefits: who forgives all its iniquities, who heals all its diseases, who redeems its life from corruption, who crowns it with compassion and mercy; for it depends not on the one who wills or runs, but on God who shows mercy.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:29: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:30: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:2 (102:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 103:3 (102:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 103:4 (102:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:5; Rom 8:28–30; Matt 22:14; Rom 9:8; Rom 11:5–6; Rom 9:23; Acts 4:32; Ps 103:2–4 (102:2–4); Rom 9:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.25 (CSEL 57:65–66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-25).

## Letter 186.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-26
- Source: CSEL 57:66
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The rest were created to show what free choice can do without grace, so that the elect may learn what grace has given them.

### Latin text

Ceteri autem homines ad istam societatem non pertinentes. quorum tamen et animam et corpus dei bonitas operata est et quicquid habet ipsa natura praeter uitium. quod eidem inflixit superbientis uoluntatis audacia, propter hoc a deo praesciente creati sunt, ut in his ostenderet, liberum desertoris arbitrium sine sua gratia quid ualeret, et in eorum iustis et debitis poenis uasa misericordiae, quae non suorum operum meritis sed gratuita dei gratia sunt ab illa concretione discreta, quid sibi conlatum esset, addiscerent, ut omne os obstruatur et, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur.

### English translation (Claude)

But the rest of humanity, who do not belong to this fellowship (though God's goodness made both their soul and body and whatever their nature has apart from the vice that the boldness of a proud will inflicted on it), were created by a foreknowing God for this purpose: that in them he might show what the free choice of a deserter can do without his grace, and that in their just and deserved punishments the vessels of mercy, which have been separated from that lump not by the merits of their own works but by the free grace of God, might learn what had been conferred on them, so that every mouth may be stopped and 'he who boasts may boast in the Lord'.

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:19: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 3:19; 1 Cor 1:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.26 (CSEL 57:66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-26).

## Letter 186.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-27
- Source: CSEL 57:66–67
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who deny original sin must say what becomes of infants who die unbaptized; Pelagius himself anathematized the view that such infants have eternal life.

### Latin text

Quisquis aliter docet et non adquiescit sanis sermonibus domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui dixit: Venit filius hominis quaerere et saluare. quod perierat - non enim ait quod periturum fuerat sed quod perierat quid ostendens nisi peccato primi hominis uniuersi generis humani perisse naturam? - qui ergo aliter docet et non adquiescens ei, quae secundum pietatem est, doctrinae, contra gratiam saluatoris et contra sanguinem redemptoris tamquam saluam et liberam naturam defendit humanam et Christiano tamen censeri uocabulo affectat, quid de paruulorum discretione dicturus est, cur alius in uitam de secundi hominis adsumatur, alius in morte primi hominis relinquatur? si dixerit liberi arbitrii merita praecessisse. respondit apostolus, quae supra diximus de nondum natis neque aliquid agentibus boni aut mali: si autem dixerit, quod adhuc in libris, quos nuperrime Pelagius perhibetur edidisse, defenditur — quamuis iam uideatur anathemasse in episcopali iudicio Palaestino eos, qui dicunt, quod peccatum Adae ipsum solum laeserit et non genus humanum —, si ergo dixerit ambos sine uitio natos nec aliquid de primi hominis damnatione traxisse, profecto, quoniam negare non audet in regnum caelorum adoptari eum, qui fuerit regeneratus in Christo, respondeat, quid de illo futurum sit, qui nulla sua culpa non baptizatus ista fuerit temporali morte praeuentus. non putamus esse dicturum. quod innocentem deus nec habentem originale peccatum ante annos, quibus habere poterat proprium, aeterna morte damnabit; cogitur itaque respondere, quod iam Pelagius in ecclesiastico iudicio, ut aliquo modo catholicus pronuntiaretur, anathemare compulsus est, infantes, etiamsi non baptizentur, habere uitam aeternam; hac enim negata quid nisi mors aeterna remanebit?

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ, who said, 'The Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost' (he did not say 'what would be lost' but 'what was lost', showing what, if not that the nature of the whole human race perished by the sin of the first man?), whoever, then, teaches otherwise and does not agree with the teaching that accords with godliness, but defends human nature as sound and free against the grace of the Saviour and against the blood of the Redeemer, and yet aspires to be reckoned by the Christian name, what will he say about the distinguishing of little children, why one is taken up into the life of the second man while another is left in the death of the first? If he says that merits of free choice went before, the apostle has answered with what we said above about those not yet born and doing nothing good or evil. But if he says what is still defended in the books that Pelagius is said to have published very recently (although he appears already to have anathematized, at the episcopal trial in Palestine, those who say that Adam's sin harmed only himself and not the human race), if, then, he says that both were born without fault and drew nothing from the condemnation of the first man, then certainly, since he does not dare deny that one who has been reborn in Christ is adopted into the kingdom of heaven, let him answer what will become of one who, through no fault of his own, has been overtaken by this temporal death unbaptized. We do not think he will say that God will condemn to eternal death an innocent who has no original sin, before the years in which he could have a sin of his own. He is therefore forced to answer what Pelagius, in order to be pronounced in some way Catholic, was already compelled at the church trial to anathematize: that infants, even if they are not baptized, have eternal life. For if this is denied, what will remain but eternal death?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:3: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 6:3; Luke 19:10. The trial is the Synod of Diospolis (415). Augustine's view that unbaptized infants are condemned is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.27 (CSEL 57:66–67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-27).

## Letter 186.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-28
- Source: CSEL 57:67–68
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To say unbaptized infants have life contradicts Christ's words in John 6, the apostolic see, and Pelagius's own anathema.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc et contra sententiam domini disputabit dicentis: Patres uestri manducauerunt manna in deserto et mortui sunt; hic est panis de caelo descendens, ut, si quis ex ipso manducauerit, non moriatur — non enim de ista morte loquebatur, quam necesse est patiantur, etiam qui de ipso pane manducant; et paulo post: Amen. amen dico uobis; nisi manducaueritis carnem filii hominis et biberitis eius sanguinem, non habebitis uitam in uobis, utique illam, quae post hanc mortem futura est — et contra apostolicae sedis auctoritatem, ubi de hac ipsa re cum ageretur, hoc testimonium adhibitum est euangelicum, ne paruuli non baptizati uitam posse habere credantur, et contra ipsius Pelagii uerba apud episcopos, a quibus audiebatur, expressa, ubi anathemauit eos, qui dicerent infantes non baptizatos habere uitam aeternam.

### English translation (Claude)

And so he will argue against the saying of the Lord, who says: 'Your fathers ate manna in the desert and died; this is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that if anyone eats of it, he will not die' (for he was not speaking of this death, which even those who eat of that bread must suffer); and a little later: 'Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you will not have life in you', certainly the life that will be after this death. He will argue too against the authority of the apostolic see, where, when this very matter was dealt with, this testimony of the Gospel was brought forward, so that it may not be believed that unbaptized little ones can have life; and against the words of Pelagius himself, expressed before the bishops by whom he was heard, when he anathematized those who said that unbaptized infants have eternal life.

### Scripture references

- John 6:49: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:50: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:53: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 6:49–50, 53. The apostolic see's use of John 6:53 is in Pope Innocent's letter to the Council of Milevis (Augustine, Ep. 182).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.28 (CSEL 57:67–68; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-28).

## Letter 186.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-29
- Source: CSEL 57:68–69
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Some in Paulinus's city cling to the view that unbaptized infants have life, but Christ's words in John 6 force the admission that they cannot.

### Latin text

Quod propterea commemorauimus, quoniam quidam etiam apud uos uel in uestra potius ciuitate. si tamen uerum est, quod audiuimus, tanta pro isto errore obstinatione nituntur, ut dicant facilius esse, ut etiam Pelagium deserant atque contemnant, qui haec sentientes anathemauit, quam ut ab huius sententiae, sicut eis uidetur, ueritate discedant. si autem cedunt sedi apostolicae uel potius ipsi magistro et domino apostolorum qui dicit non habituros uitam in semet ipsis, nisi manducauerint carnem filii hominis et biberint sanguinem, quod nisi baptizati non utique possunt. nempe aliquando fatebuntur paruulos non baptizatos uitam habere non posse ac per hoc quamlibet tolerabilius omnibus. qui etiam propria peccata committunt, tamen aeterna morte multari.

### English translation (Claude)

We have mentioned this because some people even among you, or rather in your own city (if what we have heard is true), insist on this error with such obstinacy that they say it would be easier for them to desert and despise even Pelagius, who anathematized those holding these views, than to depart from what seems to them the truth of this opinion. But if they yield to the apostolic see, or rather to the very Master and Lord of the apostles, who says that they will not have life in themselves unless they eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood (which they certainly cannot do unless baptized), they will surely at some point admit that unbaptized little ones cannot have life, and therefore are punished with eternal death, however much more bearably than all those who also commit sins of their own.

### Scripture references

- John 6:53: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 6:53. The 'city' is Nola. Augustine's view of the milder punishment of unbaptized infants is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.29 (CSEL 57:68–69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-29).

## Letter 186.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-30
- Source: CSEL 57:69
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since unbaptized infants lack life and a just God would not condemn the innocent, their condemnation must come from original sin in Adam.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint. audeant disputare et, quibus possunt, persuadere contendant deum iustum, apud quem non est iniquitas, paruulos a peccatis propriis innocentes, si nec illo ex Adam obligati et obstricti sunt, morte perpetua damnaturum. quod si absurdissimum est et a iustitia dei penitus alienum et tamen nullus, qui se meminit catholicae fidei Christianum, negat aut dubitat paruulos non accepta gratia regenerationis in Christo sine cibo carnis eius et sanguinis potu non habere in se uitam ac per hoc poenae sempiternae mortis obnoxios, profecto restat, ut, quia ipsi non egerunt aliquid boni aut mali, ideo mortis eorum iusta sit poena. quia in illo moriuntur, in quo omnes peccauerunt, unde in illo solo uiuificantur, a quo peccatum nec originale trahi potuit nec proprium perpetrari.

### English translation (Claude)

Since this is so, let them dare to argue, and try to persuade whom they can, that a just God, with whom there is no injustice, will condemn to everlasting death little ones innocent of sins of their own, if they are not bound and held fast by that sin from Adam either. But if this is utterly absurd and wholly foreign to God's justice, and yet no one who remembers that he is a Christian of the Catholic faith denies or doubts that little ones who have not received the grace of rebirth in Christ, without eating his flesh and drinking his blood, do not have life in themselves and are therefore liable to the punishment of everlasting death, then surely it remains that, since they themselves have done nothing good or evil, the punishment of their death is just because they die in him in whom all sinned; and so they are made alive only in him from whom neither original sin could be contracted nor any sin of his own committed.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: allusion, high confidence
- John 6:53: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:14; John 6:53; Rom 5:12; 1 Cor 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.30 (CSEL 57:69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-30).

## Letter 186.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-31
- Source: CSEL 57:69–70
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God gathered a remnant even from unwilling Jerusalem by grace, and Augustine likewise cries out against those who resist the Church even after Pelagius's trial in Palestine.

### Latin text

Ipse uocauit nos non solum ex Iudaeis uerum etiam ex gentibus, quoniam et illius Hierusalem filios, quae interfecit prophetas et lapidauit missos ad se, quamuis ipsa nolente collegit ipse, quos uoluit, et ante incarnationem suam sicut ipsos prophetas et, posteaquam uerbum caro factum est, sicut apostolos et hominum milia, qui et pretia rerum suarum ante pedes apostolorum posuerunt. omnes quippe illi filii sunt Hierusalem nolentis, ut colligerentur, qui tamen illo uolente collecti sunt, de quibus dicit: Si ego in Beelzebub eicio daemonia, filii uestri in quo eiciunt? ideo ipsi iudices erunt uestri. de his praedictum erat: Si fuerint filii Israhel sicut arena maris, reliquiae saluae fient. non potest excidere uerbum dei nec reppulit plebem suam, quam praesciuit, quae tamen reliquiae per electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. si autem gratia, quod saepe dicendum est, iam non ex operibus: alioquin gratia iam non est gratia. non haec utique nostra sed apostoli uerba sunt. quod ergo ad Hierusalem nolentem colligi filios suos ille clamabat, hoc nos clamamus aduersus eos, qui filios uolentes ecclesiae colligi nolunt nec saltem post iudicium, quod de ipso Pelagio in Palaestina factum est corriguntur, de quo damnatus exisset, nisi obiecta sibi contra gratiam dei dicta, quae obscurare non potuit, ipse damnasset.

### English translation (Claude)

He has called us not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles, since he himself gathered whom he willed even from the children of that Jerusalem which killed the prophets and stoned those sent to her, though she herself was unwilling: before his incarnation, such as the prophets themselves, and after the Word became flesh, such as the apostles and the thousands of people who laid the price of their possessions at the apostles' feet. For all these are children of the Jerusalem that was unwilling for them to be gathered, who were nevertheless gathered by his will; of them he says: 'If I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges.' Of them it had been foretold: 'Though the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant will be saved.' The word of God cannot fail, nor has he rejected his people whom he foreknew; and this remnant has been saved by the election of grace. 'But if by grace' (as must often be said), 'it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.' These are not our words but the apostle's. What he cried out to Jerusalem, unwilling for her children to be gathered, we cry out against those who are unwilling for children who are willing to be gathered to the Church, and who are not corrected even after the judgment pronounced on Pelagius himself in Palestine, from which he would have come out condemned had he not himself condemned the statements against the grace of God that were brought against him, which he could not obscure.

### Scripture references

- Matt 23:37: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 4:35: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 12:27: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:27: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 10:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:2: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 23:37; John 1:14; Acts 4:34–35; Matt 12:27; Isa 10:22 / Rom 9:27; Rom 9:6; Rom 11:2, 5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.31 (CSEL 57:69–70; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-31).

## Letter 186.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-32
- Source: CSEL 57:70–72
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists the propositions charged against Pelagius at Diospolis, which he had to anathematize.

### Latin text

Praeter illa enim, quae, quoquo modo potuit, ausus est qualicumque ratione defendere, obiecta sunt quaedam, quae nisi remota omni tergiuersatione anathemasset, ipse anathema factus esset. obiectum est enim eum dicere Adam mortalem factum, qui siue peccaret siue non peccaret, moriturus esset; et quod peccatum eius ipsum solum laeserit et non genus humanum; et quod infantes nuper nati in illo statu sint, in quo Adam fuit ante praeuaricationem; et quod neque per mortem uel praeuaricationem Adae omne genus hominum moriatur neque per resurrectionem Christi omne genus hominum resurgat; et infantes, etiam si non baptizentur, habere uitam aeternam; et diuites baptizatos, nisi omnibus abrenuntient, si quid boni uisi fuerint facere, non reputari illis nec eos habere posse regnum dei; et gratiam dei atque adiutorium non ad singulos actus dari, sed in libero arbitrio esse uel in lege atque doctrina; et dei gratiam secundum merita nostra dari; et filios dei non posse uocari, nisi omni modo absque peccato fuerint effecti; et non esse liberum arbitrium, si dei indiget auxilio, quoniam in propria uoluntate habet unusquisque aut facere aliquid aut non facere; et uictoriam nostram non ex dei esse adiutorio sed ex libero arbitrio; et quod paenitentibus uenia non detur secundum gratiam et misericordiam dei sed secundum meritum et laborem eorum, qui per paenitentiam digni fuerint misericordia.

### English translation (Claude)

For besides the things that he dared to defend, in whatever way he could, by some reasoning or other, certain charges were brought against him which, had he not anathematized them without any evasion, would have made him anathema himself. For it was charged that he says: that Adam was made mortal and would have died whether he sinned or not; that his sin harmed himself alone and not the human race; that newborn infants are in the state in which Adam was before the transgression; that neither does the whole human race die through the death or transgression of Adam, nor does the whole human race rise through the resurrection of Christ; that infants, even if they are not baptized, have eternal life; that baptized rich people, unless they renounce everything, are not credited with any good they may seem to do, and cannot have the kingdom of God; that God's grace and help are not given for individual acts but consist in free choice or in the law and teaching; that God's grace is given according to our merits; that people cannot be called children of God unless they have been made wholly without sin; that there is no free choice if it needs God's help, since each has it in his own will either to do something or not to do it; that our victory is not from God's help but from free choice; and that pardon is given to penitents not according to the grace and mercy of God but according to the merit and labour of those who through repentance have become worthy of mercy.

### Translation notes

- The list follows the charges at the Synod of Diospolis (415).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.32 (CSEL 57:70–72; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-32).

## Letter 186.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-33
- Source: CSEL 57:72–74
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whoever accepts Pelagius's anathemas must positively confess the Catholic counterparts: original sin, the need of baptism, grace for every act, and grace not given according to merit.

### Latin text

Haec omnia Pelagius sic anathemauit, quod satis gesta ipsa testantur, ut nihil ad ea quoquo modo defendenda disputationis adtulerit. unde fit consequens, ut, quisquis sequitur illius episcopalis auctoritatem iudicii et ipsius Pelagii confessionem, haec tenere debeat, quae semper tenuit catholica ecclesia: Adam, nisi peccasset, non fuisse moriturum; et quod peccatum eius non ipsum solum laeserit sed et genus humanum; et quod infantes nuper nati non sint in illo statu, in quo Adam fuit ante praeuaricationem, ut ad ipsos etiam pertineat, quod breuiter ait apostolus: Per unum hominem mors et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum; sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, ita et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. unde fit, ut infantes non baptizati non solum regnum caelorum uerum etiam uitam aeternam habere non possint. confiteatur etiam diuites baptizatos si diuitiis suis non careant et sint tales, quales ad Timotheum describit apostolus dicens: Praecipe diuitibus huius mundi non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo. qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum: diuites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant. communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam. non eos regno dei posse priuari. fateatur gratiam dei et adiutorium etiam ad singulos actus dari eamque non dari secundum merita nostra, ut uera sit gratia, id est gratis data per eius misericordiam, qui dixit: Miserebor, cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo. cui misericors fuero. fateatur filios dei uocari posse illos, qui cotidie dicunt: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, quod utique non ueraciter dicerent, si essent omni modo absque peccato. fateatur esse liberum arbitrium, etiam si diuino indiget adiutorio. fateatur, quando contra temptationes concupiscentiasque inlicitas dimicamus, quamuis illic habeamus et propriam uoluntatem, non tamen ex illa sed ex adiutorio dei nostram prouenire uictoriam; non enim aliter uerum erit, quod apostolus ait: Non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei. fateatur secundum gratiam et misericordiam dei ueniam paenitentibus dari, non secundum meritum eorum, quando quidem etiam ipsam paenitentiam donum dei dixit apostolus, ubi ait de quibusdam: Ne forte det illis deus paenitentiam. haec omnia simpliciter sine ullis fateatur ambagibus, si quis in auctoritatem catholicam et in ipsius Pelagii expressa ecclesiasticis gestis uerba consentit. neque enim illa, quae his sunt contraria, ueraciter anathemata esse credendum est, nisi haec, quibus sunt contraria, fideli corde teneantur et aperta confessione promantur.

### English translation (Claude)

All these Pelagius anathematized, as the proceedings themselves sufficiently attest, in such a way that he offered no argument in defence of any of them. It follows that whoever follows the authority of that episcopal judgment and Pelagius's own confession must hold what the Catholic Church has always held: that Adam would not have died had he not sinned; that his sin harmed not himself alone but also the human race; that newborn infants are not in the state in which Adam was before the transgression, so that what the apostle briefly says applies to them too: 'Through one man came death, and through one man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.' Hence unbaptized infants can have neither the kingdom of heaven nor eternal life. Let him confess also that baptized rich people, even if they do not give up their riches, if they are such as the apostle describes to Timothy, saying, 'Command the rich of this world not to be haughty, nor to hope in uncertain riches but in the living God, who provides us richly with everything to enjoy; let them be rich in good works, give readily, share, store up for themselves a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of true life', cannot be deprived of the kingdom of God. Let him confess that the grace and help of God is given even for individual acts, and is not given according to our merits, so that it may be true grace, that is, given freely by the mercy of him who said: 'I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show compassion to whom I have been compassionate.' Let him confess that those can be called children of God who say daily, 'Forgive us our debts', which they would certainly not say truthfully if they were wholly without sin. Let him confess that there is free choice, even if it needs divine help. Let him confess that when we fight against temptations and unlawful desires, although we have our own will there too, our victory comes not from it but from God's help; for otherwise what the apostle says will not be true: 'It depends not on the one who wills or runs, but on God who shows mercy.' Let him confess that pardon is given to penitents according to the grace and mercy of God, not according to their merit, since the apostle called even repentance itself a gift of God, where he says of certain people: 'In case God may grant them repentance.' All these let him confess simply, without any evasions, whoever agrees with Catholic authority and with the words of Pelagius himself recorded in the church proceedings. For it must not be believed that the contrary propositions have been truly anathematized unless these, to which they are contrary, are held with a faithful heart and brought out in open confession.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:18: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 6:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 2:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:21–22; 1 Tim 6:17–19; Exod 33:19 / Rom 9:15; Matt 6:12; Rom 9:16; 2 Tim 2:25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.33 (CSEL 57:72–74; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-33).

## Letter 186.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-34
- Source: CSEL 57:74
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius's later books still give the will equal power to sin or not to sin, or call it strong and firm, whereas it is weak until healed.

### Latin text

Nec in istis libris recentioribus, quos idem Pelagius post illud iudicium dicitur edidisse, quamuis adiutorio diuinae gratiae consentire uideatur, quid de hac re sentiat. satis euidenter apparet. aliquando enim ita paribus momentis potestatem uoluntatis aequa lance perpendit, ut. quantum ualet ad peccandum, tantum etiam ad non peccandum ualere definiat. quod si ita est, nullus locus adiutorio gratiae reseruatur, sine qua nos dicimus ad non peccandum nihil ualere uoluntatis arbitrium. aliquando autem cotidiano gratiae dei muniri nos confitetur auxilio, quamuis habeamus ad non peccandum forte ac firmum liberum arbitrium, quod utique inualidum et infirmum potius debuit confiteri, donec sanentur omnes languores animae nostrae. non enim pro infirmitate corporis precabatur, qui dicebat: Miserere mei, domine, quoniam infirmus sum; sana me, domine, quoniam conturbata sunt ossa mea; nam ut ostenderet pro anima se rogare, secutus adiunxit: Et anima mea turbata est ualde.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor in those more recent books, which the same Pelagius is said to have published after that judgment, does it appear clearly enough what he thinks on this matter, although he seems to agree with the help of divine grace. For sometimes he weighs the power of the will in an even balance, with equal weights, so as to define that it has as much power for not sinning as for sinning. If that is so, no room is left for the help of grace, without which we say the choice of the will has no power for not sinning. But at other times he confesses that we are protected by the daily help of God's grace, although, he says, we have a free choice that is strong and firm for not sinning; whereas he ought rather to have confessed it weak and infirm, until all the diseases of our soul are healed. For the one who said, 'Have mercy on me, Lord, for I am weak; heal me, Lord, for my bones are troubled', was not praying about bodily weakness; for to show that he was asking on behalf of his soul he went on to add: 'And my soul is greatly troubled.'

### Scripture references

- Ps 103:3 (102:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 6:2 (6:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 6:3 (6:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 103:3 (102:3); Ps 6:2–3 (6:3–4 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.34 (CSEL 57:74; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-34).

## Letter 186.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-35
- Source: CSEL 57:74–75
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius's statement that grace lets us fulfil commands 'more easily' implies that they can be fulfilled without grace.

### Latin text

Videtur ergo auxilium gratiae tamquam ex abundanti putare concedi, id est ut, etiam si non concedatur. habeamus tamen ad non peccandum forte ac firmum liberum arbitrium. quod ne existimemur de illo temere suspicari et fortasse quis dicat sic eam sentire forte ac firmum ad non peccandum liberum um, quamuis sine dei gratia id efficere atque implere non possit, sicut sanos oculos firmos dicimus ad uidendum, quod tamen facere nullo modo possunt, si desit lucis auxilium. alio loco apertius. quid diceret uel putaret, ostendit. ubi ait ideo dei gratiam hominibus dari. ut. quod facere per liberum iubentur arbitrium, facilius possint implere per gratiam. utique cum dicit facilius, quid utique intellegi, nisi. et gratia si desit. posse per liberum arbitrium uel facile uel etiam difficile, quae uult iubentur, impleri?

### English translation (Claude)

He seems, then, to think that the help of grace is granted as something extra, that is, that even if it is not granted, we still have a free choice strong and firm for not sinning. And lest we be thought to suspect this of him rashly (and perhaps someone might say that he means free choice is strong and firm for not sinning although without God's grace it cannot accomplish and fulfil this, just as we call healthy eyes strong for seeing, though they can by no means do so if the help of light is lacking), in another place he shows more plainly what he says or thinks, where he says that God's grace is given to people so that what they are commanded to do by free choice they may more easily fulfil by grace. Certainly when he says 'more easily', what does he mean to be understood except that, even if grace is lacking, what is commanded can be fulfilled by free choice, whether easily or with difficulty?

### Translation notes

- The digital text is damaged here ('sic eam sentire … liberum um'); translated by sense, assuming 'liberum arbitrium'. Pelagius's phrase is quoted also in Augustine's On the Grace of Christ 1.27–29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.35 (CSEL 57:74–75; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-35).

## Letter 186.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-36
- Source: CSEL 57:75–76
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Scripture, as John of Jerusalem reminded Pelagius, says that nothing good is achieved without grace, not merely more easily; and Pelagius's 'even balance' contradicts his own concession.

### Latin text

Ubi est ergo: Quid est homo, nisi quod memor es eius? ubi postremo illa testimonia. quae Hierosolymitanae antistes ecclesiae, sicut in eisdem gestis legitur. ipsi Pelagio se dixisse commemorat. cum ad eum perlatum esset. quod sine gratia dei diceret absque peccato esse hominem posse? haec sunt enim ab illo dicta tria testimonia ualde magna contra huius modi impiam praesumptionem, quod apostolus ait: Plus omnibus illis laboraui. non ego autem sed gratia dei mecum, et: Non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei, et: Nisi dominus aedificauerit domum in uanum laborauerunt aedificantes eam. quo modo ergo, quod deus iubet, sine diuinitus ipsius uel difficile impletur, cum. si dominus non aedificet, in uanum aedificans laborasse dicatur neque scriptum sit ceat quidem uolentis atque currentis, facilius autem miserentis est dei, sed scriptum sit: Non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei, non quia nulla est hominis uoluntas atque cursus, sed quia nihil potest, nisi misereatur deus, nec apostolus dixerit et ego, sed dixerit: Non ego autem sed gratia dei mecum, non quia ipse nihil boni agebat, sed quia nihil ageret, si illa non adiuuaret? quamquam illa possibilitatis liberi arbitrii tam in bonum quam in malum ei aequa lance perpensio nec huic facilitati locum relinquit, quam saltem uidetur esse confessus dicendo: Facilius possint implere per gratiam; si enim bonum per gratiam facilius impletur, facillime autem sine gratia fit malum. profecto ista possibilitas non aequa lance perpenditur.

### English translation (Claude)

Where then is 'What is man, unless you are mindful of him?' Where, finally, are those testimonies which the bishop of the church of Jerusalem, as we read in the same proceedings, recalls that he quoted to Pelagius himself, when it was reported to him that Pelagius said a man could be without sin without the grace of God? These were the three very weighty testimonies he cited against such ungodly presumption: what the apostle says, 'I laboured more than all of them; yet not I, but the grace of God with me'; and 'It depends not on the one who wills or runs, but on God who shows mercy'; and 'Unless the Lord builds the house, those who build it labour in vain.' How then is what God commands fulfilled, even with difficulty, without his divine help, when it is said that if the Lord does not build, the builder has laboured in vain, and it is not written, 'It depends indeed on the one who wills and runs, but more easily on God who shows mercy', but it is written, 'It depends not on the one who wills or runs, but on God who shows mercy'? Not because there is no human will and running, but because they can do nothing unless God has mercy. And the apostle did not say 'and I', but said, 'yet not I, but the grace of God with me', not because he himself did no good, but because he would do none unless grace helped. And yet that weighing of the capacity of free choice for good and evil alike in an even balance leaves no room even for this 'ease' which he at least seems to have confessed by saying, 'They may more easily fulfil it by grace.' For if good is fulfilled more easily by grace, but evil is done most easily without grace, then certainly this capacity is not weighed in an even balance.

### Scripture references

- Ps 8:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 127:1 (126:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 8:4 (adapted); 1 Cor 15:10; Rom 9:16; Ps 127:1 (126:1). The bishop of Jerusalem is John, at the earlier hearing reported in the Diospolis proceedings. The phrase 'sine diuinitus ipsius' is damaged in the digital text (a word such as 'adiutorio' seems lost); translated by sense. The digital text's 'ceat' is unclear; translated by sense as 'It depends indeed'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.36 (CSEL 57:75–76; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-36).

## Letter 186.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-37
- Source: CSEL 57:76–77
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: We should pray for the Pelagians, who like the philosophers trust the will and risk making void the cross, since nature could not even keep its health without grace.

### Latin text

Sed quid plura? non solum ad istos uitandos cauti esse debemus. uerum etiam ad docendos uel monendos, si patiantur, pigrescere non debemus. plus eis tamen sine dubitatione praestamus, si, ut corrigantur, oremus, ne cum tantis ingeniis uel pereant uel alios perdant praesumptione damnabili, quia zelum dei habent sed non secundum scientiam: ignorantes autem dei iustitiam, id est iustitiam, quae ex deo est, et suam uolentes constituere. iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. quibus utique. quoniam Christiani appellantur, magis obseruandum est quam Iudaeis. de quibus hoc dixit apostolus, ne offendant in lapidem offensionis uelut argute defendendo naturam et liberum arbitrium quem ad modum philosophi huius mundi, qui uehementer egerunt, ut putarentur uel putarent sibi beatam uitam uirtute propriae uoluntatis efficere. caueant ergo isti, ne per sapientiam uerbi euacuent crucem Christi et hoc sit eis offendere in lapidem offensionis. natura enim humana etiam si in illa integritate, in qua condita est. permaneret, nullo modo se ipsa creatore suo non adiuuante seruaret. cum igitur sine dei gratia salutem non posset custodire, quam accepit, quo modo sine dei gratia potest reparare, quam perdidit?

### English translation (Claude)

But why say more? We must not only be careful to avoid these men, but also not grow slack in teaching or admonishing them, if they will bear it. Yet without doubt we do more for them if we pray that they may be corrected, so that with such great talents they may not perish or destroy others by damnable presumption; because they have a zeal for God but not according to knowledge: not knowing the righteousness of God, that is, the righteousness that is from God, and wishing to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God. For these, since they are called Christians, this must be watched even more than for the Jews, of whom the apostle said it, lest they stumble on the stone of stumbling by cleverly defending nature and free choice, like the philosophers of this world, who strove hard to be thought, or to think themselves, to produce the happy life by the power of their own will. Let these men beware, then, lest by wisdom of words they make void the cross of Christ, and this be for them a stumbling on the stone of stumbling. For human nature, even if it had remained in the integrity in which it was created, could by no means have preserved itself without its Creator's help. Since, then, without God's grace it could not keep the health it had received, how can it without God's grace restore the health it has lost?

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:32: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:2–3; Rom 9:32–33; 1 Cor 1:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.37 (CSEL 57:76–77; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-37).

## Letter 186.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-38
- Source: CSEL 57:77–78
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Though their error is their own fault, we must pray for them, as Paul prayed for unbelieving Israel, since belief itself requires God's grace.

### Latin text

Non autem ideo pro istis non debemus orare, quia, si non corriguntur, eorum inputandum est uoluntati, qui nolunt credere etiam ad hoc ipsum sibi necessariam gratiam saluatoris, quod putant consistere in solis uiribus uoluntatis. nam et illi, quibus sunt isti in hac causa omnino simillimi, de quibus hoc dixit apostolus, quod ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti, profecto suae uoluntatis uitio non credebant. non enim, ut essent infideles, cogebantur inuiti, sed nolendo credere infidelitatis crimine non carebant. et tamen quia uoluntas, ut ad uera credenda moueatur, non sibi sufficit, nisi per gratiam deus opituletur, dicente ipso domino, cum de non credentibus loqueretur: Nemo uenit ad me. nisi ei datum fuerit a patre, propter hoc et apostolus, quamuis eis instanter euangelium praedicaret, parum tamen esse cernebat, nisi pro illis etiam oraret, ut crederent; ait enim: Fratres, bona uoluntas quidem cordis mei et deprecatio ad deum fit pro illis in salutem; et tunc adiunxit illa, quae diximus: Testimonium enim illis perhibeo, quia zelum dei habent sed non secundum scientiam et cetera. oremus ergo pro illis, sancte frater.

### English translation (Claude)

We should not, however, fail to pray for them on the ground that, if they are not corrected, it must be imputed to their own will, since they refuse to believe that the grace of the Saviour is necessary to them even for the very thing they think consists in the powers of the will alone. For those too, whom these men closely resemble in this matter, of whom the apostle said that not knowing the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own they did not submit to the righteousness of God, certainly did not believe through the fault of their own will. They were not forced against their will to be unbelievers; by refusing to believe they did not escape the guilt of unbelief. And yet, since the will is not sufficient for itself to be moved to believe what is true unless God assists by grace (as the Lord himself said when speaking of those who did not believe, 'No one comes to me unless it is given him by the Father'), for this reason the apostle too, though he preached the gospel to them earnestly, saw that it was not enough unless he also prayed for them that they might believe. For he says: 'Brothers, my heart's good will and my prayer to God for them is for their salvation'; and then he added what we have quoted: 'For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge', and so on. Let us pray for them, then, holy brother.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- John 6:65: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:3; John 6:65; Rom 10:1–2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.38 (CSEL 57:77–78; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-38).

## Letter 186.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-39
- Source: CSEL 57:78
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine assures Paulinus that his letters show him a true lover of grace and explains why he has written at such length.

### Latin text

Cernis quippe nobiscum, quam malo errore teneantur. fragrant enim epistulae tuae odore sincerissimo Christi. ubi germanissimus gratiae ipsius dilector et confessor appares. sed quod diu tecum ei hac re loquendum putauimus, primo, quia iucundissimum est, fecimus; quid enim debet esse iucundius uel infirmis gratia, qua sanantur, uel pigris gratia. qua excitantur, uel uolentibus gratia, qua iuuantur? deinde, ut. si quid nostra disputatione deo adiuuante possemus, tua non fides sed fidei contra tales adminicularetur assertio, sicut nos quoque in hanc facultatem tuae germanitatis litteris adiuuamur.

### English translation (Claude)

For you see with us in what an evil error they are held. Your letters are fragrant with the most sincere aroma of Christ, in which you appear as a most genuine lover and confessor of his grace. But we thought we should speak with you at length on this matter, first because it is most delightful (for what should be more delightful to the weak than the grace by which they are healed, or to the sluggish than the grace by which they are roused, or to the willing than the grace by which they are helped?); and secondly, so that, if by God's help our discussion could achieve anything, it might support not your faith but the assertion of the faith against such people, just as we too are helped in this capacity by the letters of Your Brotherliness.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 2:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 2:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.39 (CSEL 57:78; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-39).

## Letter 186.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-40
- Source: CSEL 57:78–79
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Paulinus's own lament over the corruption inherited from Adam as a confession of original sin.

### Latin text

Quid enim uberius et ueracissima confessione plenius quam illud est in quadam epistula tua, ubi naturam nostram non mansisse, ut condita est, sed uitiatam esse per illum generis humani patrem humiliter deplorasti dicens: Pauper ego et dolens, qui adhuc terrenae imaginis squalore concretus sum et plus de primo quam de secundo Adam carnis sensibus et terrenis actibus refero, quo modo tibi audebo me pingere, cum caelestis imaginis infitiari prober corruptione terrena? utrimque me concludit pudor. erubesco pingere, quod sum; non audeo pingere, quod non sum: odi, quod sum, et non sum, quod amo. sed quid misero mihi proderit odisse iniquitatem et amare uirtutem. cum id potius agam. quod odi, nec elaborem piger id potius agere. quod amo? ipse discors mei intestino bello distrahor, dum spiritus aduersus carnem, caro aduersus spiritum dimicat et lex corporis lege peccati legem mentis inpugnat. infelix ego, qui uenenatum inimicae arboris gustum nec crucis ligno digessi! durat enim mihi illud per Adam uirus paternum, quo uniuersitatem generis sui pater praeuaricatus infecit et cetera, quae de hac miseria multa contexis ingemiscendo expectans redemptionem corporis tui et nondum re sed spe saluum te esse cognoscens.

### English translation (Claude)

For what is richer and fuller of most truthful confession than that passage in one of your letters, where you humbly lamented that our nature did not remain as it was created but was vitiated through that father of the human race, saying: 'Poor and sorrowful as I am, still caked with the squalor of the earthly image, and resembling the first Adam more than the second in the senses of the flesh and earthly acts, how shall I dare to paint myself for you, when I am proved to deny the heavenly image by earthly corruption? Shame hems me in on both sides: I blush to paint what I am; I do not dare to paint what I am not. I hate what I am, and I am not what I love. But what will it profit wretched me to hate iniquity and love virtue, when I rather do what I hate and, sluggish, do not labour to do rather what I love? At odds with myself I am torn by civil war, while the spirit fights against the flesh and the flesh against the spirit, and the law of the body, by the law of sin, attacks the law of the mind. Unhappy that I am, who have not digested even by the wood of the cross the poisoned taste of the enemy tree! For that ancestral venom through Adam still lasts in me, with which the transgressing father infected the whole of his race', and the many other things you weave together about this misery, groaning as you await the redemption of your body and knowing that you are saved not yet in reality but in hope.

### Scripture references

- Ps 69:29 (68:30 LXX): quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 45:7 (44:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 15:49: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:15: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 5:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 8:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The quotation is from a letter of Paulinus (Paulinus, Ep. 30.2, to Sulpicius Severus). 'Poor and sorrowful' is Ps 69:29 (68:30 LXX/Vulg.); 'to hate iniquity and love virtue' echoes Ps 45:7 (44:8). Allusions: 1 Cor 15:47–49; Rom 7:15, 23; Gal 5:17; Rom 8:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.40 (CSEL 57:78–79; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-40).

## Letter 186.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-41
- Source: CSEL 57:79–81
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: All were present in Adam when he sinned, saved only by Christ born of a virgin; Augustine praises Paulinus's prayers for grace and refers further news to the bearer.

### Latin text

Sed fortassis et tu alium in te transfigurasti, cum haec diceres, nec aliquas de carne concupiscente aduersus spiritum, quamuis ei non consentias, molestias importunas pateris et odiosas. uerum tamen et tu et quisquis haec patitur et gratiam Christi, per quam de corpore mortis huius liberetur, expectat, nondum quidem euidenter in se ipso sed in illo homine latenter ibi erat, quando cibus uetitus tangebatur et concipiebatur longe lateque per cunctos itura perditio, nisi alio per uirginem tramite uenisset, qui non perierat. quaerere et saluum facere, quod perierat. de orando autem et gemitibus flagitando proficiendi ac recte uiuendi adiutorio quae tua non feruet epistula? quid est tui quantumque sermonis, ubi non sit sparsum gemibunda pietate. quod in oratione dominica dicimus: Ne nos inferas in temptationem? inuicem itaque nos et consolemur in his omnibus et exhortemur et, quantum donat dominus, adiuuemus. quae autem et de quibus audierimus, quae multum dolemus et facile credere nolumus, audiet a communi amico sanctitas tua, quo in dei misericordia cum salute remeante speramus nos de omnibus fieri posse certissimos.

### English translation (Claude)

But perhaps you too transferred to yourself another's case when you said this, and do not suffer any troublesome and hateful vexations from the flesh lusting against the spirit, though you do not consent to it. Nevertheless, both you and whoever suffers these things and awaits the grace of Christ, through which he may be delivered from the body of this death, were there, not yet visibly in yourselves but hidden in that man, when the forbidden food was touched and the perdition was conceived that would spread far and wide through all, had not one come by another path, through a virgin, who was not lost, to seek and to save what was lost. And as for praying and begging with groans for help to make progress and to live rightly, which of your letters does not burn with it? What part of your discourse, and how much of it, is not sprinkled with groaning piety for what we say in the Lord's Prayer: 'Lead us not into temptation'? Let us therefore comfort and exhort one another in all these things and, as far as the Lord grants, help one another. What we have heard, and about whom, which grieves us greatly and which we are unwilling readily to believe, Your Holiness will hear from our common friend; when he returns safely, by God's mercy, we hope to be made entirely certain about everything.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 5:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:18: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 4:6 ('transferred to myself', cf. 'transfigurasti'); Gal 5:17; Rom 7:24–25; Luke 19:10; Matt 6:13; 1 Thess 4:18. The 'common friend' is Januarius (186.1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 186.41 (CSEL 57:79–81; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-186-41).

## Letter 187.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-1
- Source: CSEL 57:81–82
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine apologizes to Dardanus for his late reply, explaining that it came not from contempt but from the difficulty of answering worthily.

### Latin text

Fateor me. frater dilectissime Dardane inlustrior mihi in caritate Christi quam in huius saeculi dignitate, litteris tuis tardius respondisse. quam debui. cuius rei causas nollem quaereres, ne molestius me feras diutius excusantem. quam pertulisti tardius rescribentem, cum ego te malim offensioni meae facile ignoscere quam de mea defensione iudicare. quaecumque illae causae fuerint, crede nullum tui apud me esse potuisse contemptum. immo enim uero citissime rescripsissem, si te contempsissem. nec modo quia tandem aliquando rescripsi. ideo saltem tandem aliquando dignum aliquid te lectore molitus sum et quod merito possim tuo nomine praenotare: sed rescribere utcumque iam malui quam pati et hanc aestatem me huius officii debitore transire. nec tua me dignitas tenuit fecitque cunctantem, cum sit humanitas tua gratior quam illa suspectior. sed unde te magis amo, hinc difficilius, unde sufficiam tantae auiditati religiosi tui amoris, inuenio.

### English translation (Claude)

I confess, my dearest brother Dardanus, more illustrious to me in the love of Christ than in the dignity of this world, that I have answered your letter later than I ought. I would rather you did not ask the reasons, lest you find me more tiresome in excusing myself at length than you found me in writing back late; for I would rather you readily pardoned my offence than sat in judgment on my defence. Whatever the reasons were, believe that there could have been no contempt of you on my part. Indeed, I would have replied very quickly if I had despised you. Nor, because I have at long last replied, have I therefore at long last produced something worthy of you as reader and fit to bear your name at its head; but I preferred to reply somehow now rather than let this summer too pass with me still in debt for this duty. Nor was it your rank that held me back and made me hesitate, since your kindness is more welcome than your rank is daunting. But the more I love you, the harder I find it to know how to satisfy so great an eagerness of your devout love.

### Translation notes

- Letter 187, to Claudius Postumus Dardanus, former praetorian prefect of Gaul (AD 417), known as 'On the Presence of God'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.1 (CSEL 57:81–82; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-1).

## Letter 187.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-2
- Source: CSEL 57:82–83
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Dardanus's indulgence, since his questions are deep and Augustine is overwhelmed with other cares.

### Latin text

Huc accessit, quod praeter mutuae caritatis flammam. qua fit, ut etiam eos, quos numquam uidimus, diligamus. dum eos habere. quod diligimus, credimus, ubi me utique praeuenisti fecistique, ut uerear in me decipi opinionem atque expectationem tuam. praeter hoc ergo tales mihi quaestiones in tua epistula proposuisti. quae, si a quolibet propositae forent, otio quoque meo, quod mihi defit, non paruum negotium fierent; cum uero abs te proponuntur, cui profunda rimanti solutionis earum superficies nequaquam sat est, et proponuntur occupatissimo aliarumque curarum molibus uallato et obstricto, tuae prudentiae est et beniuolentiae cogitare, quam te placidum habere debeam, uel quod diu non respondi uel si etiam nunc non pro tuae intentionis granditate respondero.

### English translation (Claude)

Add to this that, besides the flame of mutual love, by which we love even those we have never seen, as long as we believe they have what we love (and in this you certainly anticipated me and made me fear that your opinion of me and your expectation may be deceived), besides this, then, you set out in your letter questions of such a kind that, if anyone at all had put them, they would have made no small task even for my leisure, which I lack. But since they are put by you, for whom, probing to the depths, a surface solution of them is by no means enough, and put to one extremely busy and hemmed in and bound by the weight of other cares, it is for your prudence and kindness to consider how much I need you to be indulgent, both because I did not answer for so long and if even now I do not answer in keeping with the greatness of your purpose.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.2 (CSEL 57:82–83; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-2).

## Letter 187.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-3
- Source: CSEL 57:83
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Dardanus asked how Christ, who promised the thief paradise that day, can now be in heaven, and whether Christ's humanity is everywhere.

### Latin text

Quaeris igitur, mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus quo modo nunc esse credatur in caelo. cum pendens in ligno iamque moriturus latroni credenti dixerit: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso. et hinc fortasse intellegendum dicis paradisum quasi in aliqua caeli parte compositum aut, quia ubique deus sit. hominem quoque illum, qui in deo sit, ubique diffusum ex hoc nimirum intellegi uolens etiam in paradiso esse potuisse, qui ubique sit.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask, then, how the mediator between God and humanity, the man Christ Jesus, is now believed to be in heaven, when, hanging on the tree and about to die, he said to the believing thief, 'Today you will be with me in paradise.' And from this, you say, paradise is perhaps to be understood as situated in some part of heaven; or, since God is everywhere, that man too, who is in God, is spread out everywhere; wishing evidently to conclude from this that he who is everywhere could also be in paradise.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:43: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:5; Luke 23:43.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.3 (CSEL 57:83; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-3).

## Letter 187.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-4
- Source: CSEL 57:83–84
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that Dardanus rightly holds Christ to be perfect man, with a human soul and mind, unlike the heretics who deny either.

### Latin text

Ubi ego quaero uel potius agnosco, quem ad modum accipias hominem Christum. non utique sicut quidam haeretici uerbum dei et carnem, hoc est sine anima humana, ut uerbum esset carni pro anima, uel uerbum dei et animam et carnem sed sine mente humana, ut uerbum dei esset animae pro mente humana. non utique sic accipis hominem Christum. sed sicut superius elocutus es, ubi aisti Christum omnipotentem deum ea te ratione credulitatis accipere, ut deum non crederes, nisi perfectum etiam hominem credidisses. profecto. cum dicis hominem perfectum, totam illic naturam humanam uis intellegi; non est autem homo perfectus, si uel anima carni uel animae ipsi mens humana defuerit.

### English translation (Claude)

Here I ask, or rather I recognize, how you understand the man Christ: certainly not as certain heretics do, as the Word of God and flesh, that is, without a human soul, so that the Word took the place of a soul to the flesh; or as the Word of God and a soul and flesh but without a human mind, so that the Word of God took the place of a human mind to the soul. You certainly do not understand the man Christ in that way, but as you stated above, where you said that you accept Christ as almighty God on such a principle of belief that you would not believe him God unless you had also believed him perfect man. Clearly, when you say 'perfect man', you want the whole human nature to be understood there; and he is not perfect man if either the soul is lacking to the flesh or the human mind to the soul itself.

### Translation notes

- The heretics are the Arians (Word in place of a soul) and the Apollinarians (Word in place of a mind); Augustine does not name them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.4 (CSEL 57:83–84; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-4).

## Letter 187.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-5
- Source: CSEL 57:84–85
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If spoken of Christ's humanity, the promise cannot mean heaven, since that day Christ's soul was in hell and his body in the tomb.

### Latin text

Si ergo secundum hominem, quem uerbum deus suscepit, putamus dictum esse: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso. non ex his uerbis in caelo existimandus est esse paradisus: neque enim ipso die in caelo futurus erat homo Christus Iesus sed in inferno secundum animam, in sepulcro autem secundum carnem. et de carne quidem, quod eo die in sepulcro sit posita, manifestissimum est euangelium; quod uero illa anima in infernum descenderit, apostolica doctrina praedicat, quando quidem beatus Petrus ad hanc rem testimonium de psalmis adhibet, ubi de ipso praedicatum esse demonstrat: Quoniam non derelinques animam meam in infernum neque dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem. illud de anima dictum est. quia non ibi est derelicta, unde tam cito remeauit; illud de corpore, quod in sepulcro corrumpi celeri resurrectione non potuit. sed in sepulcro paradisum nullus intellegit. et si quisquam ita esset absurdus, ut hoc sapere conaretur eo. quod illud sepulcrum in horto erat, certe hinc ab ista opinione reuocaretur, quod ille. cui dictum est: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso, nullo die fuit cum Christo in illo sepulcro. nec eius fidei pro magno munere offerretur sepultura carnis nihil gaudii uel doloris in morte sentientis, cum ille de requie, ubi sensus est, cogitaret.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, we think that 'Today you will be with me in paradise' was said according to the man whom God the Word took up, paradise is not to be thought from these words to be in heaven; for on that very day the man Christ Jesus was not going to be in heaven, but in hell according to his soul and in the tomb according to his flesh. As for the flesh, that it was laid in the tomb on that day the Gospel makes perfectly plain; and that his soul descended into hell the apostolic teaching proclaims, since blessed Peter cites in this matter a testimony from the Psalms, where he shows that it was foretold of him: 'For you will not leave my soul in hell, nor let your Holy One see corruption.' The first was said of the soul, because it was not left there, since it returned so quickly; the second of the body, because by its swift resurrection it could not decay in the tomb. But no one understands paradise to be in the tomb. And if anyone were so absurd as to try to hold this because that tomb was in a garden, he would surely be recalled from this opinion by the fact that the man to whom it was said, 'Today you will be with me in paradise', was on no day with Christ in that tomb. Nor would the burial of a flesh that feels neither joy nor pain in death be offered to his faith as a great gift, when he was thinking of a rest where there is feeling.

### Scripture references

- Acts 2:27: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 16:10 (15:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:41: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 23:43: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 2:27, 31 (Ps 16:10, 15:10 LXX/Vulg.); John 19:41. 'Hell' (infernus) here means the underworld.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.5 (CSEL 57:84–85; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/186-24/#p-187-5).

## Letter 187.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-6
- Source: CSEL 57:85–87
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine is unsure whether Abraham's bosom belongs to hell, but suggests 'paradise' may be any place of blessed life, including that region visited by Christ's soul.

### Latin text

Restat igitur, ut, si secundum hominem dictum est: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso, in inferno intellegatur esse paradisus, ubi erat eo die futurus secundum humanam animam Christus. utrum autem sinus ille Abrahae, ubi diues ille impius, cum in tormentis esset inferni, requiescentem pauperem uidit, uel paradisi censendus uocabulo uel ad inferos pertinere existimandus sit, non facile dixerim. de illo quippe diuite legimus dictum esse: Mortuus est autem et diues et sepultus est, et: Cum apud inferos in tormentis esset. in pauperis autem morte uel requie non sunt inferi nominati, sed: Contigit, inquit, mori inopem illum et auferri ab angelis in sinum Abrahae. deinde ardenti diuiti dicit Abraham: Inter nos et uos chaos magnum firmatum est tamquam inter inferos sedesque beatorum: non enim facile alicubi scripturarum inferorum nomen positum inuenitur in bono. unde etiam quaeri solet, si nonnisi poenalia recte intelleguntur inferna, quo modo animam domini Christi pie credamus fuisse in inferno. sed bene respondetur ideo descendisse, ut, quibus oportuit, subueniret. unde beatus Petrus eum dicit soluisse dolores inferni, in quibus inpossibile erat teneri eum. porro si utraque regio et dolentium et requiescentium, id est et ubi diues ille torquebatur et ubi pauper ille laetabatur, in inferno esse credenda est, quis audeat dicere dominum Iesum ad poenales inferni partes uenisse tantum modo nec fuisse apud eos, qui in Abrahae sinu requiescunt?ubi si fuit, ipse est intellegendus paradisus, quem latronis animae illo die dignatus est polliceri. quae si ita sunt, generale paradisi nomen est, ubi feliciter uiuitur. neque enim quia paradisus est appellatus, ubi Adam fuit ante peccatum, propterea scriptura prohibita est etiam ecclesiam uocare paradisum cum fructu pomorum.

### English translation (Claude)

It remains, then, that if 'Today you will be with me in paradise' was said according to the man, paradise is to be understood as being in hell, where Christ was to be on that day according to his human soul. But whether that bosom of Abraham, where the ungodly rich man, being in the torments of hell, saw the poor man at rest, should be counted by the name of paradise or thought to belong to hell, I could not easily say. Of that rich man we read: 'The rich man also died and was buried', and, 'Being in torment in hell'. But in the death or rest of the poor man hell is not named; rather, 'It happened', it says, 'that the poor man died and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom.' Then Abraham says to the burning rich man: 'Between us and you a great chasm has been fixed', as if between hell and the seats of the blessed. For one does not easily find the name of hell used anywhere in the Scriptures in a good sense. Hence it is also often asked how, if only places of punishment are rightly understood as hell, we can piously believe that the soul of the Lord Christ was in hell. But it is well answered that he descended in order to help those whom it was fitting to help. Hence blessed Peter says that he loosed the pains of hell, by which it was impossible for him to be held. Further, if both regions, of those in pain and of those at rest, that is, both where the rich man was tormented and where the poor man rejoiced, are to be believed to be in hell, who would dare to say that the Lord Jesus came only to the penal parts of hell and was not with those who rest in Abraham's bosom? And if he was there, that is to be understood as the paradise which he deigned to promise to the thief's soul on that day. If this is so, 'paradise' is a general name for wherever life is happy. For because the place where Adam was before sin was called paradise, Scripture was not therefore prevented from also calling the Church a paradise with the fruit of its trees.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:22: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:23: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 16:26: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:24: allusion, high confidence
- Song 4:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 23:43: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 16:22–26; Acts 2:24. The Church as paradise with fruit alludes to Song 4:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.6 (CSEL 57:85–87; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-6).

## Letter 187.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-7
- Source: CSEL 57:87
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The simpler explanation is that Christ spoke as God, who is everywhere, so that whoever is in paradise is with him.

### Latin text

Est autem sensus multo expeditior et ab his omnibus ambiguitatibus liber, si non secundum id. quod homo erat, sed secundum id. quod deus erat. Christus dixisse accipiatur: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso. homo quippe Christus illo die secundum carnem in sepulcro, secundum animam in inferno futurus erat: deus uero idem ipse Christus ubique semper est. est enim lux. quae lucet etiam in tenebris, quamuis eam tenebrae non comprehendant; est uirtus et sapientia dei, de qua scriptum est, quod adtingat a fine usque ad finem fortiter et disponat omnia suauiter et adtingat ubique propter suam munditiam et nihil inquinatum in eam incurrat. ubicumque sit ergo paradisus, quisquis beatorum ibi est, cum illo ibi est, qui ubique est.

### English translation (Claude)

But the meaning is much simpler and free of all these ambiguities if Christ is taken to have said, 'Today you will be with me in paradise', not according to what he was as man, but according to what he was as God. For the man Christ was that day to be in the tomb according to the flesh and in hell according to the soul; but the same Christ as God is always everywhere. For he is the light that shines even in the darkness, though the darkness does not comprehend it; he is the power and wisdom of God, of which it is written that it reaches mightily from end to end and orders all things sweetly, and reaches everywhere because of its purity, and nothing defiled enters into it. Wherever paradise is, then, whoever of the blessed is there is there with him who is everywhere.

### Scripture references

- John 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:43: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 7:24 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:5; 1 Cor 1:24; Wis 8:1 and 7:24–25 (an extrabiblical text on this site).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.7 (CSEL 57:87; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-7).

## Letter 187.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-8
- Source: CSEL 57:87–88
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ is one person, God and man, as a man is one of soul and flesh, so each saying must be referred to the nature it concerns.

### Latin text

Cum enim sit Christus deus et homo — deus utique, unde dicit: Ego et pater unum sumus: homo autem, unde dicit: Pater maior me est — idemque filius dei unigenitus a patre et filius hominis ex semine Dauid secundum carnem, utrumque in illo obseruandum est, cum loquitur uel cum de illo scriptum loquitur, et, quid secundum quid dicatur, intuendum. nam sicut unus homo est anima rationalis et caro, sic unus Christus est uerbum et homo. proinde quod ad uerbum adtinet, creator est Christus, omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt; quod uero ad hominem. creatus est Christus, factus est enim ex semine Dauid secundum carnem et in similitudine hominum factus. item quia in homine duo sunt, anima et caro, secundum animam tristis fuit usque ad mortem, secundum carnem passus est mortem.

### English translation (Claude)

For since Christ is God and man (God, as when he says, 'I and the Father are one'; man, as when he says, 'The Father is greater than I'), and the same is the only-begotten Son of God from the Father and the son of man from the seed of David according to the flesh, both must be borne in mind in him when he speaks or when Scripture speaks of him, and we must look to see what is said according to which. For just as one man is a rational soul and flesh, so one Christ is the Word and man. Accordingly, as regards the Word, Christ is Creator, for all things were made through him; as regards the man, Christ was created, for he was made from the seed of David according to the flesh and made in the likeness of men. Likewise, since in a man there are two things, soul and flesh, according to the soul he was sorrowful even to death, and according to the flesh he suffered death.

### Scripture references

- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:3: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:38: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 10:30; John 14:28; Rom 1:3; John 1:3; Phil 2:7; Matt 26:38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.8 (CSEL 57:87–88; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-8).

## Letter 187.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-9
- Source: CSEL 57:88–89
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Because of the unity of Christ's person, what belongs to one nature can be said of him under the other, as when the Lord of glory is said to be crucified.

### Latin text

Nec tamen, cum filium dei Christum dicimus, hominem separamus aut, cum eundem Christum filium hominis dicimus, separamus deum. secundum hominem namque in terra erat, non in caelo, ubi nunc est, quando dicebat: Nemo ascendit in caelum nisi, qui de caelo descendit, filius hominis, qui est in caelo, quamuis secundum id. quod filius dei erat, esset in caelo, secundum id uero, quod filius hominis erat. adhuc esset in terra nondumque ascendisset in caelum. similiter, cum secundum id, quod filius dei est. sit dominus gloriae, secundum id autem, quod est filius hominis, crucifixus sit, ait tamen apostolus: Si enim cognouissent, numquam dominum gloriae crucifixissent. ac per hoc et filius hominis secundum deum erat in caelo et filius dei secundum hominem crucifigebatur in terra. sicut ergo potuit recte dici dominus gloriae crucifixus, cum ad solam carnem illa passio pertineret, ita recte dici potuit: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso, cum iuxta humanam humilitatem per carnem in sepulcro, per animam in inferno illo die futurus esset, iuxta diuinam uero inmutabilitatem numquam de paradiso, quia ubique semper est, recessisset.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet when we call Christ the Son of God we do not separate the man, nor when we call the same Christ the Son of Man do we separate God. For according to the man he was on earth, not in heaven, where he now is, when he said, 'No one has ascended into heaven except he who came down from heaven, the Son of Man, who is in heaven'; although according to what he was as Son of God he was in heaven, while according to what he was as Son of Man he was still on earth and had not yet ascended into heaven. Similarly, although according to what he is as Son of God he is the Lord of glory, and according to what he is as Son of Man he was crucified, the apostle nevertheless says: 'For if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory.' And so the Son of Man was in heaven according to God, and the Son of God was crucified on earth according to the man. Just as, then, it could rightly be said that the Lord of glory was crucified, though that suffering belonged to the flesh alone, so it could rightly be said, 'Today you will be with me in paradise', although according to human lowliness he was to be that day in the tomb through the flesh and in hell through the soul, while according to divine unchangeableness he had never left paradise, since he is always everywhere.

### Scripture references

- John 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:8: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 23:43: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 3:13; 1 Cor 2:8; Luke 23:43.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.9 (CSEL 57:88–89; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-9).

## Letter 187.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-10
- Source: CSEL 57:89–90
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ's risen body, immortal but still a body, is in heaven, not everywhere; he is everywhere as God and in heaven as man.

### Latin text

Noli itaque dubitare ibi nunc esse hominem Christum Iesum, unde uenturus est, memoriterque recole et fideliter tene Christianam confessionem, quoniam resurrexit a mortuis, ascendit in caelum, sedet ad dexteram patris nec aliunde quam inde uenturus est ad uiuos mortuosque iudicandos et sic uenturus est illa angelica uoce testante, quem ad modum est ire uisus in caelum, id est in eadem forma carnis atque substantia, cui profecto inmortalitatem dedit, naturam non abstulit. secundum hanc formam non est putandus ubique diffusus. cauendum est enim, ne ita diuinitatem adstruamus hominis, ut ueritatem corporis auferamus. non est autem consequens, ut, quod in deo est, ita sit ubique sicut deus. nam et de nobis ueracissima scriptura dicit, quod in illo uiuimus et mouemur et sumus, nec tamen sicut ille ubique sumus, sed aliter homo ille in deo quoniam aliter et deus ille in homine proprio quodam et singulari modo. una enim persona est deus et homo et utrumque est unus Christus Iesus ubique per id. quod deus est, in caelo autem per id, quod homo.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not doubt, then, that the man Christ Jesus is now there from where he will come; recall to memory and hold faithfully the Christian confession: that he rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, and will come from there and nowhere else to judge the living and the dead. And he will come, as the angelic voice testifies, in the same way as he was seen going into heaven, that is, in the same form and substance of flesh, to which he certainly gave immortality but did not take away its nature. According to this form he is not to be thought spread out everywhere. For we must beware of so asserting the divinity of the man as to take away the reality of the body. It does not follow that what is in God is everywhere as God is. For of us too the most truthful Scripture says that in him we live and move and have our being, and yet we are not everywhere as he is; but that man is in God in a different way, since God too is in that man in a different way, a way proper and singular. For God and man are one person, and both are the one Christ Jesus: everywhere in that he is God, but in heaven in that he is man.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:11: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 17:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The creed; Acts 1:11; Acts 17:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.10 (CSEL 57:89–90; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-10).

## Letter 187.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-11
- Source: CSEL 57:90
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is not spread through the world like a physical mass but whole everywhere, as wisdom is equally present in a small or a large man.

### Latin text

Quamquam et in eo ipso, quod dicitur deus ubique diffusus. carnali resistendum est cogitationi et mens a corporis sensibus auocanda. ne quasi spatiosa magnitudine opinemur deum per cuncta diffundi, sicut humus aut humor aut aer aut lux ista diffunditur — omnis enim huiusce modi magnitudo minor est in sui parte quam in toto —, sed ita potius. sicuti est magna sapientia etiam in homine, cuius corpus est paruum. et, si duo sint sapientes, quorum sit alter corpore grandior neuter sapientior, non est illa in maiore maior, minor in minore aut minor in uno quam in duobus, sed tanta in hoc quanta in illo et tanta in unoquoque quanta in utroque: neque enim. si aequaliter sunt omnino sapientes, plus sapiunt ambo quam singuli, quem ad modum, si aequaliter sint inmortales, non plus uiuunt ambo quam singuli.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet even in saying that God is spread out everywhere we must resist carnal thinking and withdraw the mind from the bodily senses, so as not to imagine that God is spread through all things with a spatial magnitude, as earth or water or air or this light is spread (for every magnitude of this kind is less in its part than in the whole); but rather as wisdom is great even in a man whose body is small. And if there are two wise men, one larger in body, neither wiser, wisdom is not greater in the larger and less in the smaller, nor less in one than in two, but as great in this one as in that, and as great in each as in both. For if they are entirely equally wise, both together are not wiser than each, just as, if they are equally immortal, both together do not live more than each.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.11 (CSEL 57:90; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-11).

## Letter 187.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-12
- Source: CSEL 57:90–91
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Like health in the members of a body, immortality is equally present in every part, whatever its size.

### Latin text

Ipsa denique inmortalitas corporis, quae in Christi carne praecessit nobisque in fine futura promittitur, cum magna sit res, non est profecto mole magna sed, licet corporaliter habeatur. incorporea quadam excellentia. nam cum ipsum inmortale corpus minus sit in parte quam in toto, inmortalitas eius tam plena est in parte quam in toto et, cum sint aliis alia maiora, non tamen aliis alia inmortaliora sunt membra, sicuti nunc, quando omni ex parte sani sumus secundum modum praesentis in corpore sanitatis. non, quia maior est manus tota quam digitus. ideo manus totius sanitatem maiorem dicimus esse quam digiti. sed in illis inaequalibus aequalis est ipsa, quando ita breuiora grandioribus comparantur, ut. quod tam magnum esse non potest quam est aliud, possit tamen esse tam sanum. esset autem maior sanitas in maioribus membris, si essent maiora saniora: cum uero non ita est. sed maiora atque minora tam sana sunt, dispar est profecto in membrorum molibus quantitas. sed par est in disparibus sanitas.

### English translation (Claude)

Indeed, the immortality of the body itself, which came first in the flesh of Christ and is promised to us at the end, though it is a great thing, is certainly not great in bulk, but, though possessed bodily, by a kind of incorporeal excellence. For though the immortal body itself is less in a part than in the whole, its immortality is as full in a part as in the whole; and though some members are larger than others, some are not more immortal than others. So it is now, when we are healthy in every part according to the measure of bodily health in this present life: we do not say that the health of the whole hand is greater than that of a finger because the whole hand is greater than the finger; rather, health is equal in those unequal members, when smaller members are compared with larger ones in such a way that what cannot be as great as another can nevertheless be as healthy. Health would be greater in larger members if the larger were healthier; but since this is not so, and larger and smaller are equally healthy, there is indeed unequal quantity in the bulk of the members, but equal health in the unequal.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.12 (CSEL 57:90–91; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-12).

## Letter 187.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-13
- Source: CSEL 57:91–92
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If a bodily quality like health can be whole in every part, far more can the Creator's substance be whole everywhere.

### Latin text

Cum ergo sit corpus aliqua substantia, quantitas eius est in magnitudine molis eius. sanitas uero eius non quantitas sed qualitas eius est. non ergo potuit obtinere quantitas corporis, quod potuit qualitas. nam ista distantibus partibus. quae simul esse non possunt, quoniam sua quaeque spatia locorum tenent minores minora et maiores maiora, non potuit esse in singulis quibusque partibus tota uel tanta, sed amplior est quantitas in amplioribus partibus, breuior in breuioribus et in nulla parte tanta quanta per totum; qualitas uero corporis, quae sanitas dicitur, cum sanum corpus est totum, tanta est in maioribus quanta in minoribus partibus: non enim quae minus magnae sunt, ideo minus sanae sunt aut quae ampliores ideo saniores. absit ergo, ut, quod potest in corpore qualitas creati corporis, non possit in se ipsa substantia creatoris.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, a body is a substance of some kind, its quantity lies in the magnitude of its bulk, but its health is not its quantity but its quality. So the quantity of a body could not achieve what its quality could. For quantity, in parts set apart from one another that cannot be in the same place together, since each holds its own extent of space, the smaller parts smaller extents and the larger larger, could not be whole or as great in each part; rather, the quantity is greater in the larger parts and less in the smaller, and in no part as great as in the whole. But the quality of a body that is called health, when the whole body is healthy, is as great in the larger parts as in the smaller; for those that are less large are not therefore less healthy, nor are the larger healthier. Far be it, then, that what the quality of a created body can do in a body, the substance of the Creator cannot do in itself.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.13 (CSEL 57:91–92; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-13).

## Letter 187.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-14
- Source: CSEL 57:92–93
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God fills heaven and earth not as a quality or a mass but as the creating substance, whole in each place and whole everywhere.

### Latin text

Est ergo deus per cuncta diffusus. ipse quippe ait per prophetam: Caelum et terram ego impleo, et quod paulo ante posui de sapientia eius: Adtingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter et disponit omnia suauiter; itemque scriptum est: Spiritus domini repleuit orbem terrarum, eique dicitur in quodam psalmo: Quo abibo ab spiritu tuo et a facie tua quo fugiam? si ascendero in caelum, tu ibi es; si descendero in infernum, ades. sed sic est deus per cuncta diffusus, ut non sit qualitas mundi sed substantia creatrix mundi sine labore regens et sine onere continens mundum non tamen per spatia locorum quasi mole diffusa ita, ut in dimidio mundi corpore sit dimidius et in alio dimidio dimidius atque ita per totum totus, sed in solo caelo totus et in sola terra totus et in caelo et in terra totus et nullo contentus loco sed in se ipso ubique totus.

### English translation (Claude)

God, then, is spread through all things. He himself says through the prophet, 'I fill heaven and earth'; and, as I quoted a little earlier about his wisdom, 'It reaches mightily from end to end and orders all things sweetly'; and again it is written, 'The Spirit of the Lord has filled the world'; and to him it is said in a psalm: 'Where shall I go from your Spirit, and where shall I flee from your face? If I ascend into heaven, you are there; if I descend into hell, you are present.' But God is spread through all things in such a way that he is not a quality of the world but the creative substance of the world, ruling the world without toil and holding it together without burden; yet not spread through spaces of place as if by bulk, so that he would be half in half the body of the world and half in the other half, and so whole in the whole; but he is whole in heaven alone and whole in earth alone, and whole in heaven and earth, and contained in no place, but whole everywhere in himself.

### Scripture references

- Jer 23:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 139:7 (138:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 139:8 (138:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 1:7 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jer 23:24; Wis 8:1 and 1:7 (extrabiblical texts on this site); Ps 139:7–8 (138:7–8).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.14 (CSEL 57:92–93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-14).

## Letter 187.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-15
- Source: CSEL 57:93
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The three persons of the Trinity do not divide the world among them but are each and together everywhere, since they are not bodies.

### Latin text

Ita pater, ita filius, ita spiritus sanctus, ita trinitas unus deus. neque enim mundum inter se in tres partes diuiserunt, quas singulas singuli implerent, quasi non haberet, ubi esset, filius aut spiritus sanctus in mundo, si totum occupasset pater. non ita se habet uera incorporea inmutabilisque diuinitas. non enim corpora sunt, quorum amplior sit in tribus quam in singulis magnitudo, nec loca suis molibus tenent, ut distantibus spatiis simul esse non possint. si enim anima in corpore constituta non solum nullas angustias uerum etiam quandam latitudinem inuenit non corporalium locorum sed spiritalium gaudiorum, cum fit, quod ait apostolus: Nescitis, quoniam corpora uestra templum in uobis spiritus sancti est, quem habetis a deo. nec dici nisi stultissime potest non habere locum in nostro corpore spiritum sanctum; quod totum nostra anima impleuerit. quanto stultius dicitur ullis angustiis impediri alicubi trinitatem, ut pater et filius et spiritus sanctus ubique simul esse non possint!

### English translation (Claude)

So it is with the Father, so with the Son, so with the Holy Spirit, so with the Trinity, one God. For they did not divide the world among themselves into three parts for each to fill one, as if the Son or the Holy Spirit would have nowhere to be in the world if the Father had occupied the whole. The true incorporeal and unchangeable divinity is not like that. For they are not bodies, whose magnitude would be greater in three than in each one, nor do they hold places by their bulk, so that they could not be together in spaces set apart. For if the soul placed in the body finds there not only no narrowness but even a certain breadth, not of bodily places but of spiritual joys, when what the apostle says comes about, 'Do you not know that your bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God?', and if it can only be said most foolishly that the Holy Spirit has no room in our body because our soul has filled the whole of it, how much more foolish is it to say that the Trinity is hindered anywhere by any narrowness, so that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit cannot be everywhere together!

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 6:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 6:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.15 (CSEL 57:93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-15).

## Letter 187.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-16
- Source: CSEL 57:93–94
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is present everywhere by his divinity but dwells only in some by grace, which is why we pray 'Our Father, who are in heaven'.

### Latin text

Verum illud est multo mirabilius, quod, cum deus ubique sit totus, non tamen in omnibus habitat. non enim omnibus dici potest, quod ait apostolus, uel quod iam dixi uel etiam illud: Nescitis, quia templum dei estis et spiritus dei habitat in uobis? unde et e contrario de quibusdam idem dicit: Quisquis autem spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est eius. quis porro audeat opinari. nisi quisquis inseparabilitatem penitus trinitatis ignorat, quod in aliquo habitare possit pater aut filius, in quo non habitet spiritus sanctus, aut in aliquo spiritus sanctus, in quo non et pater et filius? unde fatendum est ubique esse deum per diuinitatis praesentiam sed non ubique per habitationis gratiam. propter hanc enim habitationem, ubi procul dubio gratia dilectionis eius agnoscitur, non dicimus: Pater noster, qui es ubique, cum et hoc uerum sit, sed: Pater noster. qui es in caelis. ut templum eius potius in oratione commemoremus, quod et nos ipsi esse debemus et, in quantum sumus. in tantum ad eius societatem et adoptionis familiam pertinemus. si enim populus dei nondum factus aequalis angelis eius adhuc in ista peregrinatione dicitur templum eius, quanto magis est templum eius in caelis, ubi est populus angelorum. quibus adgregandi et coaequandi sumus, cum finita peregrinatione, quod promissum est, sumpserimus!

### English translation (Claude)

But much more wonderful is this: that although God is whole everywhere, he does not dwell in all. For it cannot be said to all what the apostle says, either what I have already quoted or this: 'Do you not know that you are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you?' Hence the same apostle says the opposite of some: 'But anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.' And who would dare to suppose, unless he were utterly ignorant of the inseparability of the Trinity, that the Father or the Son could dwell in someone in whom the Holy Spirit does not dwell, or the Holy Spirit in someone in whom the Father and the Son do not? Hence it must be admitted that God is everywhere by the presence of his divinity, but not everywhere by the grace of his indwelling. Because of this indwelling, in which the grace of his love is beyond doubt recognized, we do not say, 'Our Father, who are everywhere', though this too is true, but 'Our Father, who are in heaven', so that in prayer we may rather call to mind his temple, which we ourselves also ought to be; and in so far as we are, so far do we belong to his fellowship and to the family of adoption. For if the people of God, not yet made equal to his angels, is called his temple while still on this pilgrimage, how much more is his temple in heaven, where the people of the angels is, to whom we are to be joined and made equal when, our pilgrimage ended, we receive what has been promised!

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:9: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 20:36: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 3:16; Rom 8:9; Matt 6:9; Luke 20:36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.16 (CSEL 57:93–94; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-16).

## Letter 187.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-17
- Source: CSEL 57:94–96
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God dwells unequally in the saints, though he is whole in himself everywhere; nearness to him is likeness, as sight is nearness to light.

### Latin text

Cum igitur. qui ubique est, non in omnibus habitet, etiam in quibus habitat, non aequaliter habitat. nam unde est illud, quod Helisaeus poposcit, ut dupliciter in eo fieret spiritus dei. qui erat in Helia? et unde in omnibus sanctis sunt aliis alii sanctiores, nisi abundantius habendo habitatorem deum? quo modo ergo uerum supra diximus, quod deus ubique sit totus, quando in aliis est amplius in aliis minus? sed non est neglegenter intuendum, quod diximus in se ipso esse ubique totum, non ergo in eis, quae alia plus eum capiunt alia minus. ideo enim ubique esse dicitur, quia nulli parti rerum absens est, ideo totus, quia non parti rerum partem suam praesentem praebet et alteri parti alteram partem, aequales aequalibus, minori uero minorem maiorique maiorem, sed non solum uniuersitati creaturae uerum etiam cuilibet parti eius totus pariter adest. hique ab eo longe esse dicuntur, qui peccando dissimillimi facti sunt, et hi ei propinquare, qui eius similitudinem pie uiuendo recipiunt, sicut recte dicuntur oculi tanto esse ab hac luce longius, quanto fuerint caeciores; quid enim tam longe est a luce quam caecitas, etiamsi lux praesto sit atque oculos perfundat extinctos? propinquare autem luci merito perhibentur oculi, qui sanitatis accessu aciem recipiendo proficiunt.

### English translation (Claude)

So he who is everywhere does not dwell in all, and even in those in whom he dwells he does not dwell equally. Otherwise, why did Elisha ask that the Spirit of God that was in Elijah might be doubled in him? And why among all the saints are some holier than others, unless by having God as indweller more abundantly? How then did we speak truly above in saying that God is whole everywhere, when he is in some more fully and in others less? But we must look carefully at what we said: that he is whole everywhere in himself, not in the things of which some receive him more and others less. For he is said to be everywhere because he is absent from no part of the world, and whole because he does not present a part of himself to one part of things and another part to another, equal to equal, smaller to smaller and larger to larger, but is present whole equally not only to the whole of creation but also to any part of it. Those are said to be far from him who by sinning have become most unlike him, and those to draw near to him who by living devoutly receive his likeness; just as eyes are rightly said to be the farther from this light the blinder they are (for what is so far from light as blindness, even if the light is at hand and floods the extinguished eyes?), and eyes are rightly said to draw near to the light that make progress in recovering their sight as health returns.

### Scripture references

- 2 Kgs 2:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Kgs 2:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.17 (CSEL 57:94–96; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-17).

## Letter 187.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-18
- Source: CSEL 57:96–97
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is everywhere because nowhere absent and in himself because not contained or needing the things to which he is present.

### Latin text

Porro autem, quod parum distincte putauimus posse intellegi, cum diceremus deum esse ubique totum, nisi adderemus in se ipso, ideo diligentius exponendum. quo modo enim ubique, si in se ipso? ubique scilicet, quia nusquam est absens; in se ipso autem, quia non continetur ab eis. quibus est praesens, tamquam sine his esse non possit. nam spatia locorum tolle corporibus, nusquam erunt et, quia nusquam erunt, nec erunt. tolle ipsa corpora qualitatibus corporum, non erit, ubi sint, et ideo necesse est, ut non sint. etenim cum per totam suam molem corpus aequaliter sanum est aut aequaliter candidum, non est in ulla quam in alia parte eius sanitas maior aut candor nec maior in toto quam in parte, quia non sanius aut candidius totum constat esse quam partem. si autem inaequaliter sit sanum aut inaequaliter candidum, fieri potest, ut in minore parte sit sanitas maior aut candor, cum minora quam maiora saniora uel candidiora sunt membra: usque adeo non mole constat, quod in qualitatibus magnum dicitur esse uel paruum. uerum tamen si moles ipsa corporis, quantacumque uel quantulacumque sit, penitus auferatur, qualitates eius non erit ubi sint, quamuis non mole metiendae sint. at uero deus non, si minus capitur ab illo, cui praesens est, ideo ipse minor est. totus enim in se ipso est nec, in quibus est, ita est, ut indigeat eis, tamquam non possit esse nisi in eis. sicut autem nec ab illo abest, in quo non habitat, et totus adest, quamuis eum ille non habeat, ita et illi, in quo habitat, totus est praesens, quamuis non ex toto eum capiat.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, since we thought that when we said God is whole everywhere it could not be understood clearly enough unless we added 'in himself', this must be explained more carefully. How is he everywhere, if in himself? Everywhere, clearly, because he is nowhere absent; in himself, because he is not contained by the things to which he is present, as if he could not exist without them. For take away spaces of place from bodies, and they will be nowhere; and because they will be nowhere, they will not exist. Take away bodies themselves from the qualities of bodies, and there will be nowhere for the qualities to be, and so they necessarily will not exist. For when a body is equally healthy or equally white through its whole bulk, health or whiteness is not greater in one part than in another, nor greater in the whole than in a part, since the whole is certainly not healthier or whiter than a part. But if it is unequally healthy or unequally white, it can happen that health or whiteness is greater in a smaller part, when smaller members are healthier or whiter than larger ones: so far is it from being by bulk that a thing is called great or small in qualities. Nevertheless, if the bulk of the body itself, however large or small, is taken away entirely, its qualities will have nowhere to be, though they are not to be measured by bulk. But God is not smaller himself if he is received less by one to whom he is present. For he is whole in himself, and he is not in the things in which he is in such a way as to need them, as if he could not exist except in them. And just as he is not absent from one in whom he does not dwell, and is present whole, though that one does not have him, so he is present whole to one in whom he dwells, though that one does not receive him wholly.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.18 (CSEL 57:96–97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-18).

## Letter 187.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-19
- Source: CSEL 57:97–98
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: As a sound is equally present to all hearers though received variously, so God is wholly present to each, though those in whom he dwells receive him according to their capacity.

### Latin text

Neque enim ad habitandum diuidit se per hominum corda seu corpora aliam sui partem huic tribuens illi aliam sicut lux ista per aditus et fenestras domorum, sed potius, si quemlibet sonum, cum corporea res sit ac transitoria, surdus non capit, surdaster non totum capit atque in his, qui audiunt, cum pariter ei propinquent, tanto magis alius alio capit, quanto est acutioris, tanto autem minus, quanto est obtunsioris auditus, cum ille non uarie magis minusue insonet, sed in eo loco, in quo sunt, omnibus aequaliter praesto sit, quanto excellentius deus natura incorporea et inmutabiliter uiua, qui non sicut sonus per moras temporum tendi et diuidi potest nec spatio aerio tamquam loco suo indiget, ubi praesentibus praesto sit, sed aeterna stabilitate in se ipso manens totus adesse rebus omnibus potest et singulis totus, quamuis, in quibus habitat, habeant eum pro suae capacitatis diuersitate alii amplius alii minus, quos ipse sibi dilectissimum templum gratia suae bonitatis aedificat!

### English translation (Claude)

For he does not divide himself among the hearts or bodies of human beings to dwell there, giving one part of himself to this one and another to that, as this light does through the openings and windows of houses. Rather, if a deaf man does not take in a sound at all, though it is a bodily and passing thing, and a man hard of hearing does not take it in wholly, and among those who hear, though they are equally near it, one takes it in more than another the sharper his hearing, and less the duller his hearing, though the sound itself does not ring more or less variously, but is equally present to all in the place where they are: how much more excellently can God, of incorporeal and unchangeably living nature, who cannot be stretched and divided through lapses of time like a sound, nor needs airy space as his place in which to be present to those present, but remaining in himself in eternal stability, be present whole to all things and whole to each, even though those in whom he dwells have him, according to the difference of their capacity, some more fully and some less, those whom he builds for himself, by the grace of his goodness, as his most beloved temple!

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.19 (CSEL 57:97–98; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-19).

## Letter 187.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-20
- Source: CSEL 57:98–99
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Spirit divides gifts without being divided, as members share one health; the unity of Christ's body is shown in the Eucharistic sacrifice.

### Latin text

Et donationum quidem dictae sunt diuisiones tamquam per partes et membra unius corporis, ubi et simul omnes unum templum et singuli singula templa sumus, quia non est deus in omnibus quam in singulis maior et fit plerumque, ut plures eum minus capiant, unus amplius. sed cum dixisset apostolus: Diuisiones autem donationum sunt, continuo subiecit: Idem autem spiritus; item cum ipsas donationum diuisiones commemorasset, omnia autem haec, inquit, operatur unus atque idem spiritus diuidens propria unicuique, prout uult; diuidens ergo, non ipse diuisus, quia ipse unus atque idem. illae uero diuisiones dictae sunt sicut membrorum in corpore, quia non idem ualent aures quod oculi atque ita membra cetera diuersis officiis concorditer distributa. quae tamen, cum sani sumus, una neque diuersa nec alibi maiore alibi minore sed, cum sint ipsa disparia, communi et parili salute congaudent. huius corporis caput est Christus, huius corporis unitas nostro sacrificio commendatur, quod breuiter significauit apostolus dicens: Unus panis, unum corpus multi sumus. per caput nostrum reconciliamur deo. quia in illo est diuinitas unigeniti facta particeps mortalitatis nostrae, ut et nos participes eius inmortalitatis essemus.

### English translation (Claude)

Divisions of gifts are indeed spoken of, as among the parts and members of one body, where we are both all together one temple and each one a temple, because God is not greater in all than in each, and it often happens that many receive him less and one more fully. But when the apostle had said, 'There are divisions of gifts', he added at once, 'but the same Spirit'; and again, having listed the divisions of gifts, he says, 'All these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each individually as he wills.' Dividing, then, not himself divided, because he is one and the same. Those divisions are spoken of as of the members in a body, because the ears have not the same function as the eyes, and so too the other members, harmoniously distributed in different functions; yet when we are healthy, they rejoice together in a common and equal health, one and not various, not greater here and less there, though they themselves are unequal. The head of this body is Christ; the unity of this body is commended in our sacrifice, which the apostle briefly signified when he said: 'One bread, one body, we who are many.' Through our head we are reconciled to God, because in him the divinity of the Only-begotten has been made a sharer in our mortality, so that we too might be sharers in his immortality.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 12:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:11: quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:18: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 12:4, 11; Eph 1:22, Col 1:18; 1 Cor 10:17. 'Our sacrifice' is the Eucharist.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.20 (CSEL 57:98–99; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-20).

## Letter 187.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-21
- Source: CSEL 57:99–100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Philosophers who knew God without thanking him are not his temple, while baptized infants who cannot yet know him are.

### Latin text

Hoc sacramentum longe est a cordibus sapientium superborum et ideo non Christianorum ac per hoc nec uere sapientium, illorum etiam dico sapientium, qui cognouerunt deum, quia cognoscentes deum, sicut dicit apostolus, non sicut deum glorificauerunt aut gratias egerunt. nosti autem, in quo sacrificio dicatur: (Gratias agamus domino deo nostro). a cuius sacrificii humilitate longe abest typhus et cothurnus illorum. et ideo multum mirabilis res est, quem ad modum quorundam nondum cognoscentium deum sit inhabitator deus et quorundam cognoscentium non sit. nec illi enim ad templum dei pertinent, qui cognoscentes deum non sicut deum glorificauerunt aut gratias egerunt, et ad templum dei pertinent paruuli sanctificati sacramento Christi, regenerati spiritu sancto, qui certe per aetatem nondum possunt cognoscere deum; unde, quem potuerunt illi nosse nec habere, isti potuerunt habere antequam nosse. beatissimi sunt autem, quibus hoc est deum habere quod nosse; ipsa quippe notitia plenissima, uerissima, felicissima est.

### English translation (Claude)

This mystery is far from the hearts of the proud wise, who are therefore not Christians and so not truly wise; I mean even those wise men who knew God, because, as the apostle says, knowing God they did not glorify him as God or give thanks. You know in what sacrifice it is said, 'Let us give thanks to the Lord our God.' Far from the humility of this sacrifice is their pomp and buskin. And so it is a very wonderful thing how God is the indweller of some who do not yet know God, and not of some who know him. For those who knew God but did not glorify him as God or give thanks do not belong to the temple of God; and little children sanctified by the sacrament of Christ and reborn of the Holy Spirit do belong to the temple of God, though by their age they certainly cannot yet know God. Hence those could know him and not have him, while these could have him before they knew him. Most blessed are those for whom to have God is the same as to know him; for that knowledge is the fullest, truest and happiest.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 1:21. 'Let us give thanks to the Lord our God' is the dialogue before the Eucharistic prayer. 'Buskin' (cothurnus) is the tragic actor's boot, a figure for pompous style.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.21 (CSEL 57:99–100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-21).

## Letter 187.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-22
- Source: CSEL 57:100
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Dardanus asked how John the Baptist could leap in the womb if infants do not know God.

### Latin text

Hic iam oportet etiam illam, quam post epistulae tuae subscriptionem addidisti, pertractare quaestionem: Si adhuc ignorant paruuli deum, quo modo Iohannes, etiam antequam nasceretur, ad aduentum et praesentiam matris domini in suae matris utero potuit exultare? cum enim commemorasses legisse te librum meum de baptismo paruulorum, addidisti et aisti: De praegnantibus quid sentias opto cognoscere, cum credulitatis fidem pro puero mater Iohannis Baptistae responderit.

### English translation (Claude)

Here I must now also deal with the question you added after the signature of your letter: 'If little children are still ignorant of God, how could John, even before he was born, leap in his mother's womb at the arrival and presence of the mother of the Lord?' For after mentioning that you had read my book on the baptism of little children, you added and said: 'I should like to know what you think about pregnant women, since the mother of John the Baptist answered with the faith of belief on behalf of the child.'

### Scripture references

- Luke 1:41: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 1:41. Augustine's book is On the Merits and Remission of Sins and on the Baptism of Infants.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.22 (CSEL 57:100; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-22).

## Letter 187.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-23
- Source: CSEL 57:100–101
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: John's leaping was a miraculous sign wrought by God in the infant, recognized by Elizabeth through the Spirit, not an act of faith by the infant.

### Latin text

Haec sunt certe uerba Elisabeth, matris Iohannis: Beata tu inter mulieres et beatus fructus uentris tui. et unde hoc mihi, ut ueniat mater domini mei ad me? ecce enim, ut facta est uox salutationis tuae in auribus meis, exultauit in gaudio infans in utero meo. hoc autem ut diceret, sicut euangelista praelocutus est, repleta est spiritu sancto, quo procul dubio reuelante cognouit, quid illa exultatio significasset infantis, id est illius uenisse matrem, cuius ipse praecursor et demonstrator esset futurus. potuit ergo esse ista significatio rei tantae a maioribus cognoscendae, non a paruulo cognitae. nam neque, cum hoc ante in euangelio narraretur, dictum est: Credidit infans in utero eius, sed exultauit, neque ipsa dixit: Exultauit in fide infans in utero meo, sed exultauit in gaudio. uidemus autem exultationem non solum paruulorum sed etiam pecorum non utique de aliqua fide uel religione uel quacumque rationali cognitione uenientem; sed haec plane inusitata et noua extitit, quia in utero et ad eius aduentum, quae hominum saluatorem fuerat paritura. ideo mira, ideo in magnis signis deputanda, ideo haec exultatio et tamquam matri domini reddita resalutatio, sicut solent miracula fieri, facta est diuinitus in infante, non humanitus ab infante.

### English translation (Claude)

These are certainly the words of Elizabeth, John's mother: 'Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb. And why is this granted to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the infant in my womb leaped for joy.' But to say this, as the evangelist said beforehand, she was filled with the Holy Spirit, by whose revelation she certainly learned what that leaping of the infant had signified, namely that the mother of him whose forerunner and herald he was to be had come. This, then, could have been a sign of so great a thing, to be recognized by adults, not recognized by the little one. For when this was first narrated in the Gospel it was not said, 'The infant in her womb believed', but 'leaped'; nor did she herself say, 'The infant in my womb leaped in faith', but 'leaped for joy'. We see leaping not only of little children but even of animals, certainly not coming from any faith or religion or any rational knowledge. But this leaping was plainly unusual and new, because it was in the womb and at the arrival of her who was to give birth to the Saviour of humankind. Therefore it was wonderful, therefore to be counted among the great signs; therefore this leaping, and as it were a return greeting given to the mother of the Lord, was, as miracles are wont to be, done divinely in the infant, not humanly by the infant.

### Scripture references

- Luke 1:42: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:43: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:44: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 1:41: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 1:41–44.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.23 (CSEL 57:100–101; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-23).

## Letter 187.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-24
- Source: CSEL 57:101–102
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even if John had the use of reason in the womb, it was a miracle, no rule for other infants, like Balaam's ass or the twins in Rebecca's womb.

### Latin text

Quamquam etiam si usque adeo est in illo puero acceleratus usus rationis et uoluntatis, ut intra uiscera materna iam posset agnoscere, credere, consentire, quod in aliis paruulis aetas expectatur ut possint, etiam hoc in miraculis habendum est diuinae potentiae, non ad humanae trahendum exempla naturae. nam quando deus uoluit, etiam iumentum mutum rationabiliter est locutum nec ideo sunt admoniti homines in deliberationibus suis etiam asinina expectare consilia. quocirca nec, quod factum est in Iohanne, contemno nec inde regulam, quid sentiendum sit de paruulis, figo; immo id in illo propterea mirabiliter praedico, quia in aliis non inuenio. habet quidem aliquid simile etiam illa in Rebeccae utero lucta geminorum; uerum et hoc usque adeo prodigium fuit, ut diuinum propterea mulier oraculum quaereret et audiret duobus illis infantulis duos populos fuisse figuratos.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet even if in that child the use of reason and will was so far accelerated that within his mother's womb he could already recognize, believe and consent, for which in other little ones age is awaited, this too must be counted among the miracles of divine power, not drawn into precedent for human nature. For when God willed, even a dumb beast spoke rationally, yet people are not thereby advised to await the counsels of an ass in their deliberations. Therefore I neither despise what happened in John nor fix from it a rule for what to think about little children; rather, I proclaim it as wonderful in him precisely because I do not find it in others. Something similar indeed is the struggle of the twins in Rebecca's womb; but this too was so much a portent that the woman sought a divine oracle because of it and heard that two peoples were prefigured in those two infants.

### Scripture references

- Num 22:28: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 25:22: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 25:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Num 22:28; 2 Pet 2:16; Gen 25:22–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.24 (CSEL 57:101–102; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-24).

## Letter 187.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-25
- Source: CSEL 57:102–103
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Infants plainly know nothing of divine things; their resistance at baptism is not imputed to them precisely because they do not know what they do.

### Latin text

Nescire autem diuina paruulos, qui nec humana adhuc nouerint, si uerbis uelimus ostendere, uereor. ne ipsis sensibus nostris facere uideamur iniuriam. quando id loquendo suademus, ubi omnes uires officiumque sermonis facillime superat euidentia ueritatis. annon uidemus, etiam cum articulatae uocis qualiacumque signa edere coeperint atque ad initium fandi transire ab infantia, adhuc eos talia sentire ac dicere, in quibus si remansissent annisque accedentibus tales esse persisterent, nullus eos uel fatuus nimium fatuos esse dubitaret? nisi forte id restat, ut in uagitu infantiae uel in ipso adhuc uteri silentio credamus paruulos fuisse sapientes, postea uero. quam nobiscum coeperunt loqui, ad hanc ignorantiam, quam ridemus, crescendo uenisse. quod opinari uides quam sit absurdum. cum puerorum sensus in qualiacumque uerba prorumpens, qui certe ad ea, quae maiores sapiunt. paene nullus est, tamen comparatus illi, in quo nascuntur, intellegentia dici potest. unde autem in ipso tantae salutis praesidio, quando eis Christiana gratia subuenitur, quod uocibus, quibus possunt, et motibus reluctantur, non eis inputatur atque omnis renisus ipsorum nihili penditur, donec in eis sacramenta peragantur, quibus id, quod de originali damnatione tractum est, expietur, nisi quia in tantum nesciunt, quod faciunt, ut nec facere iudicentur? porro si iam uterentur rationis et uoluntatis arbitrio, quo illi sanctificationi adhiberi deberet adsensus, quantum mali esset resistere tantae gratiae quamque non solum nihil prodesset, quod fieret, uerum etiam inde reatus adcresceret, quis Christianus ignoret?.

### English translation (Claude)

But if we wished to show in words that little children, who do not yet know even human things, do not know divine things, I fear we might seem to insult our own senses, trying to persuade by speech where the evidence of the truth very easily surpasses all the power and function of speech. Do we not see that even when they begin to utter signs of articulate sound of some kind and pass from infancy to the beginnings of speech, they still think and say things such that, if they remained in them and continued so as the years went by, no one, not even a fool, would doubt that they were utter fools? Unless perhaps it remains for us to believe that in the wailing of infancy, or in the still silence of the womb itself, little children were wise, and afterwards, when they began to talk with us, came by growing to this ignorance at which we laugh. You see how absurd it is to think so, when the mind of children breaking out into words of whatever kind, which is certainly almost nothing compared with what adults understand, can nevertheless be called intelligence compared with the state in which they are born. And why, at the very safeguard of so great a salvation, when Christian grace comes to their aid, is it not imputed to them that they resist with what cries and movements they can, and all their struggling is counted for nothing until the sacraments are completed in them by which what was contracted from the original condemnation is expiated, unless because they so little know what they are doing that they are not even judged to be doing it? Further, if they already used the choice of reason and will, by which consent ought to be given to that sanctification, what Christian does not know how great an evil it would be to resist so great a grace, and that what was done would not only profit nothing but guilt would even increase from it?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.25 (CSEL 57:102–103; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-25).

## Letter 187.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-26
- Source: CSEL 57:103–104
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Holy Spirit dwells in baptized infants without their knowing it, as Paul said he dwelt in the immature Corinthians.

### Latin text

Dicimus ergo in baptizatis paruulis, quamuis id nesciant, habitare spiritum sanctum. sic enim eum nesciunt, quamuis sit in eis, quem ad modum nesciunt et mentem suam, cuius in eis ratio, qua uti nondum possunt, uelut quaedam scintilla sopita est excitanda aetatis accessu. neque hoc in paruulis mirum debet uideri, cum apostolus quibusdam etiam maioribus dicat: Nescitis, quia templum dei estis et spiritus dei habitat in uobis? de qualibus paulo ante dixerat: Animalis autem homo non percipit, quae sunt spiritus dei, quos etiam paruulos uocat non carnis aetate sed mentis. non itaque percipiebant cognitione spiritum sanctum, qui habitabat in eis, et habitante in se spiritu sancto adhuc animales nondum spiritales erant, quia nondum poterant habitatorem suum spiritum cognitione percipere.

### English translation (Claude)

We say, then, that the Holy Spirit dwells in baptized little children, although they do not know it. For they do not know him, though he is in them, just as they do not know their own mind, whose reason, which they cannot yet use, is in them like a sleeping spark to be roused as age advances. Nor should this seem strange in little children, since the apostle says even to some adults, 'Do you not know that you are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you?' Of such he had said a little earlier, 'But the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God', and he calls them little children too, not in age of flesh but of mind. So they did not perceive by knowledge the Holy Spirit who dwelt in them; and with the Holy Spirit dwelling in them they were still natural, not yet spiritual, because they could not yet perceive by knowledge the Spirit their indweller.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 3:16; 1 Cor 2:14; 1 Cor 3:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.26 (CSEL 57:103–104; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-26).

## Letter 187.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-27
- Source: CSEL 57:104–105
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Spirit builds his temple in the baptized secretly and completes it only in the life to come; salvation is now in hope.

### Latin text

Habitare autem ideo et in talibus dicitur, quia in eis occulte agit, ut sint templum eius, idque in proficientibus et proficiendo perseuerantibus perficit. spe enim salui facti sumus, sicut apostolus dicit, cum alio loco dicat: Saluos nos fecit per lauacrum regenerationis. cum ergo hic dicat: Saluos nos fecit, tamquam salus ipsa iam data sit. quem ad modum accipiendum sit, illic exponit, ubi ait: Spe enim salui facti sumus. spes autem, quae uidetur, non est spes; quod enim uidet quis, quid et sperat? si autem, quod non uidemus, speramus, per patientiam expectamus. multa itaque dicuntur in scripturis diuinis tamquam facta sint, cum adhuc in spe esse intellegantur. unde est et illud, quod dominus discipulis ait: Omnia, quae audiui a patre meo, nota uobis feci, quod usque adeo secundum spem dictum est futurorum, ut eis postmodum dicat: Multa habeo uobis dicere, sed non potestis illa portare modo. agit ergo, in quibus adhuc mortalibus habitat, ipsam aedificationem habitaculi sui, quam non in ista sed in alia post hanc uitam perficit, quando obsorbebitur mors in uictoriam diceturque illi: Ubi est, mors, uictoria tua? ubi est. mors, aculeus tuus? quid est autem mortis aculeus nisi peccatum?

### English translation (Claude)

He is said to dwell even in such people because he works in them secretly so that they may be his temple, and he brings this to completion in those who make progress and persevere in progress. For 'we have been saved in hope', as the apostle says, although in another place he says, 'He saved us through the washing of regeneration.' Since, then, he says here 'He saved us', as if salvation itself had already been given, he explains how this is to be understood where he says: 'For we have been saved in hope. But hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.' Many things, then, are spoken of in the divine Scriptures as if done, when they are understood to be still in hope. Hence also what the Lord said to the disciples: 'All that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you', which was said so much according to hope of things to come that he says to them afterwards: 'I have many things to tell you, but you cannot bear them now.' So in those in whom he dwells while they are still mortal he carries on the very building of his dwelling, which he completes not in this life but in another after this, when death will be swallowed up in victory and it will be said to it: 'Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?' And what is the sting of death but sin?

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:25: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- John 15:15: quotation, high confidence
- John 16:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:55: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:56: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:24–25; Titus 3:5; John 15:15; John 16:12; 1 Cor 15:54–56.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.27 (CSEL 57:104–105; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-27).

## Letter 187.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-28
- Source: CSEL 57:105–106
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even after baptism the whole Church prays 'Forgive us our debts'; she will be without spot or wrinkle only in the life to come.

### Latin text

Propter quod nunc etiam renati ex aqua et spiritu omnibusque peccatis siue originis ex Adam, in quo omnes peccauerunt, siue factorum, dictorum cogitationumque nostrarum in illius lauacri mundatione deletis tamen, quia mansimus in hac uita humana, quae temptatio est super terram, merito dicimus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. et hanc orationem uniuersa dicit ecclesia. quam mundat saluator lauacro aquae in uerbo, ut eam sibi exhibeat gloriosam, non habentem maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi tunc utique, cum perficietur in re, ubi nunc proficiendo ambulatur in spe. nam quo modo est nunc non habens maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eius modi, quae uel in omnibus ad eam pertinentibus hominibus, qui iam ratione mentis utuntur et uoluntatis arbitrio mortalisque carnis sarcinam portant, uel certe, quod etiam ipsos contentiosos necesse est fateri, in multis suis membris ueraciter dicit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra?

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason, even now that we have been reborn of water and the Spirit, and all our sins, whether of origin from Adam, in whom all sinned, or of our deeds, words and thoughts, have been blotted out in the cleansing of that washing, nevertheless, because we remain in this human life, which is a trial upon earth, we rightly say, 'Forgive us our debts.' And the whole Church says this prayer, the Church which the Saviour cleanses by the washing of water in the word, so as to present her to himself glorious, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, then, certainly, when it will be completed in reality, where now she walks in hope by making progress. For how is she now without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, when, either in all the people belonging to her who already use the reason of the mind and the choice of the will and carry the burden of mortal flesh, or at least (as even the contentious themselves must admit) in many of her members, she truthfully says, 'Forgive us our debts'?

### Scripture references

- John 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Job 7:1: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:26: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 5:27: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 3:5; Rom 5:12; Job 7:1; Matt 6:12; Eph 5:26–27. 'The contentious' are the Pelagians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.28 (CSEL 57:105–106; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-6/#p-187-28).

## Letter 187.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-29
- Source: CSEL 57:106–107
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God dwells even in immature believers who hold the common rule of faith in the Church, and will complete their understanding hereafter.

### Latin text

Cum itaque proficientes, in quibus mortalibus habitat, dum de die in diem renouantur, magis magisque iustificet, exaudiat orantes, mundet confitentes, ut exhibeat sibi templum inmaculatum in aeternum, merito dicitur non habitare in eis, qui cognoscentes deum non sicut deum glorificauerunt uel gratias egerunt. colendo enim et seruiendo creaturae potius quam creatori non unius ueri dei templum se esse uoluerunt atque ita, dum uolunt eum habere cum multis, facilius effecerunt, ut eum non haberent, quam ut diis multis falsisue miscerent. et merito dicitur habitare in eis, quos secundum propositum uocatos iustificandos glorificandosque suscepit etiam ante, quam incorpoream, quae ubique tota est ualeant eius nosse naturam, quantum nosci ex parte et per speculum et in aenigmate ab homine in hac uita, cum plurimum profecerit, potest. sunt enim, in quibus habitat, multi tales, qualibus dicit apostolus: Non potui uobis loqui quasi spiritalibus sed quasi carnalibus tamquam paruulis in Christo. lac uobis potum dedi, non escam; nondum enim poteratis; sed nec adhuc quidem potestis. his quippe etiam illud dicit: Nescitis, quia templum dei estis et spiritus dei habitat in uobis? hos tales etiam si, antequam perueniant ad spiritalem mentis aetatem, ubi non lacte alantur sed solido cibo, dies uitae huius extremus inuenerit, perficiet in eis habitator illorum, quicquid hic intellegentiae minus habuerunt. quoniam ab unitate corporis Christi, qui nobis uia factus est, et a templi dei societate non recesserunt. unde ut non recedant, regulam fidei pusillis magnisque communem in ecclesia perseueranter tenent et, in quod peruenerunt, in eo ambulant et, donec eis deus reuelet, si quid aliter sapiunt, cogitationes suas carnales non dogmatizant, quia non obdurant contentiosis defensionibus: inmanendo. sed quodam modo ambulando, id est proficiendo desudant intellegentiae perspicuitatem impetrantes per fidei pietatem.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, he justifies more and more those making progress, mortals in whom he dwells, as they are renewed from day to day, hears them when they pray, cleanses them when they confess, so as to present to himself a temple spotless for ever, he is rightly said not to dwell in those who, knowing God, did not glorify him as God or give thanks. For by worshipping and serving the creature rather than the Creator they did not wish to be the temple of the one true God; and so, while they wish to have him along with many, they have more easily brought it about that they do not have him than that they mix him with many false gods. And he is rightly said to dwell in those whom, called according to purpose, he has taken up to be justified and glorified, even before they are able to know his incorporeal nature, which is whole everywhere, as far as it can be known in part, through a mirror and in a riddle, by a human being in this life, however far he has progressed. For many of those in whom he dwells are such as those to whom the apostle says: 'I could not speak to you as spiritual but as carnal, as little children in Christ. I gave you milk to drink, not solid food, for you were not yet able; and even now you are not able.' To them he also says: 'Do you not know that you are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you?' If the last day of this life finds such people before they reach the spiritual age of the mind, where they are fed not on milk but on solid food, their indweller will complete in them whatever understanding they lacked here, since they have not withdrawn from the unity of the body of Christ, who has become our way, nor from the fellowship of the temple of God. And so that they may not withdraw, they hold perseveringly in the Church the rule of faith common to little and great, and walk in what they have attained; and until God reveals it to them, if they think otherwise in anything, they do not make dogmas of their carnal thoughts, because they do not harden in contentious defences, but, as it were, by walking on rather than standing still, that is, by making progress, they labour to obtain clarity of understanding through the piety of faith.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:28: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 5:14: allusion, medium confidence
- John 14:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 4:16; Eph 5:27; Rom 1:21, 25; Rom 8:28–30; 1 Cor 13:12; 1 Cor 3:1–2, 16; Heb 5:12–14; John 14:6; Phil 3:15–16. The digital text's 'inmanendo' is unclear; translated by sense ('rather than standing still').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.29 (CSEL 57:106–107; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-29).

## Letter 187.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-30
- Source: CSEL 57:107–108
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Birth belongs to Adam and rebirth to Christ; Christ, who had no sin, needed only to be born, but by his baptism commended our regeneration.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, duo ista, quae in uno fiunt homine, nasci et renasci, ad duos homines pertinent, unum ad illum primum Adam alterum ad secundum. qui dicitur Christus sed non prius, ait apostolus, quod spiritale est, sed quod animale, postea spiritale. primus homo de terra terrenus, secundus homo de caelo caelestis; qualis terrenus, tales et terreni et, qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes. sicut portauimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imaginem eius, qui de caelo. item dicit: Per unum hominem mors et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum; sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. omnes et omnes ideo dixit, quia in mortem nemo nisi per illum, in uitam nemo nisi per istum; in primo patuit, quid hominis arbitrium ualeret ad mortem. in secundo autem, quid dei adiutorium ualeret ad uitam. denique primus homo nonnisi homo, secundus uero deus et homo; peccatum enim factum est relicto deo, iustitia non fit sine deo. ac per hoc nec moreremur, nisi per carnalem propagationem de membris illius ueniremus, nec uiueremus, nisi per spiritalem conexionem membra huius essemus. ideo nobis opus fuit nasci et renasci, illi autem propter nos tantum modo nasci; nos enim a peccato ad iustitiam renascendo transimus, ille autem a nullo peccato ad iustitiam transitum fecit; sed in eo, quod baptizatus est, nostrae regenerationis sacramentum sua humilitate altius commendauit ueterem tamen hominem nostrum passione, nouum autem resurrectione significans.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, those two things that happen in one human being, to be born and to be reborn, belong to two men, the one to that first Adam, the other to the second, who is called Christ. 'But the spiritual is not first', says the apostle, 'but the natural, and then the spiritual. The first man was from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven, heavenly. As was the earthly, so are those who are earthly; and as is the heavenly, so are those who are heavenly. As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us also bear the image of him who is from heaven.' Again he says: 'Through one man came death, and through one man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive.' He said 'all' and 'all' because no one comes into death except through the one, and no one into life except through the other. In the first it was shown what human choice could do toward death; in the second, what God's help could do toward life. Finally, the first man was only man, but the second God and man; for sin was committed by abandoning God, and righteousness is not achieved without God. And so we would not die unless we came from the members of the former by carnal descent, nor would we live unless we were members of the latter by spiritual connection. Therefore we needed to be born and reborn, but he for our sake only to be born; for we pass by rebirth from sin to righteousness, but he made no passage from any sin to righteousness. Yet in being baptized he commended the sacrament of our regeneration all the more highly by his humility, signifying our old self by his passion and our new self by his resurrection.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:46: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:47: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:48: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:49: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:46–49; 1 Cor 15:21–22; Rom 6:4–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.30 (CSEL 57:107–108; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-30).

## Letter 187.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-31
- Source: CSEL 57:108–110
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Every child of a lawful marriage is born through concupiscence and must be reborn; Christ alone, conceived of the Virgin without concupiscence, needed no rebirth.

### Latin text

Inoboedientia namque concupiscentiae, quae habitat in carne mortali, qua fit, ut eadem membra etiam praeter uoluntatis moueantur arbitrium, ad eum modum redigitur iustitia coniugali, ut licite copulatis parentibus generentur, quibus sit necessarium regenerari. non tamen per huius modi conuenientiam maris et feminae uenire uoluit carnem suam Christus, sed de uirgine nihil tale in eius conceptu concupiscente similitudinem carnis peccati sumpsit ille pro nobis, qua caro peccati mundaretur in nobis. sicut enim per unius delictum. ait apostolus, in omnes homines ad condemnationem, ita et per unius iustitiam in omnes homines ad iustificationem uitae. nemo enim nascitur nisi operante concupiscentia carnali, quae tracta est ex primo homine, qui est Adam, et nemo renascitur nisi operante gratia spiritali, quae data est per secundum hominem, qui est Christus. quapropter si ad illum nascendo pertinemus, ad hunc renascendo nec renasci quisquam potest, antequam natus sit profecto ille singulariter natus est, cui renasci non opus fuit, quia non ex peccato, in quo numquam fuit, transitum fecit neque in iniquitate conceptus est aut eum in delictis mater eius in utero aluit, quia spiritus sanctus superuenit in eam et uirtus altissimi obumbrauit eam; unde, quod natum est ex ea sanctum, uocatur filius dei. nuptiarum enim bonum non extinguit, sed modificat inoboedientium membrorum malum, ut limitata quodam modo concupiscentia carnalis fiat saltem pudicitia coniugalis. uirgo autem Maria, cui dictum est: Et uirtus altissimi obumbrabit tibi, in concipienda prole sancta sub tali umbraculo nullo ardore concupiscentiae huius aestuauit. hoc ergo excepto lapide angulari non uideo quo modo aedificentur homines in domum dei ad habendum in se habitatorem deum, nisi cum fuerint renati, quod non possunt esse ante quam nati.

### English translation (Claude)

For the disobedience of the concupiscence that dwells in mortal flesh, by which the same members are moved even apart from the choice of the will, is reduced by conjugal righteousness to such a measure that children are begotten from lawfully united parents, who yet must be reborn. Christ, however, did not wish his flesh to come through such a union of male and female; rather, from a virgin who felt no such desire in his conception he took for us the likeness of sinful flesh, by which the flesh of sin might be cleansed in us. 'For as through the trespass of one', says the apostle, 'it came upon all men to condemnation, so also through the righteousness of one it comes upon all men to justification of life.' For no one is born except by the working of carnal concupiscence, which is derived from the first man, who is Adam; and no one is reborn except by the working of spiritual grace, which is given through the second man, who is Christ. Therefore, if we belong to the former by being born, we belong to the latter by being reborn; and no one can be reborn before he is born. Clearly he alone was born in a singular way who had no need to be reborn, because he made no passage from sin, in which he never was; nor was he conceived in iniquity, nor did his mother nourish him in sins in the womb, because the Holy Spirit came upon her and the power of the Most High overshadowed her, so that what was born of her is holy and is called the Son of God. For the good of marriage does not extinguish but moderates the evil of the disobedient members, so that carnal concupiscence, limited in a certain way, may at least become conjugal chastity. But the Virgin Mary, to whom it was said, 'And the power of the Most High will overshadow you', in conceiving her holy offspring under such a shade did not burn with any heat of this concupiscence. Apart from this cornerstone, then, I do not see how human beings are built up into the house of God, to have God as indweller in themselves, unless they have been reborn, which they cannot be before they are born.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:5 (50:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Luke 1:35: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:3; Rom 5:18; Ps 51:5 (50:7); Luke 1:35; Eph 2:20. Augustine's view of marital concupiscence is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.31 (CSEL 57:108–110; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-31).

## Letter 187.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-32
- Source: CSEL 57:110
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever sanctification may be possible in the womb, the sanctification that makes one God's temple belongs only to the reborn, who must first be born.

### Latin text

Quamlibet itaque sententiam de praegnantibus, immo de hominibus habeamus adhuc intra materna uiscera constitutis, utrum existimemus eos necne donari posse aliquo sanctificationis modo uel propter Iohannem, qui nondum in hanc editus lucem tamen exultauit in gaudio — quod utique nisi operatione spiritus sancti fieri potuisse quis credat? — uel propter Hieremiam, cui dominus dicit: Priusquam exires de uulua, sanctificaui te, tamen illa sanctificatio, qua efficimur et singuli templa dei et in unum omnes templum dei, non est nisi renatorum, quod nisi nati homines esse non possunt nullus autem uitam, in qua natus est, bene finiet nisi renatus, antequam finiat.

### English translation (Claude)

Whatever opinion, then, we hold about pregnant women, or rather about human beings still placed within their mothers' wombs, whether we think they can or cannot be granted some kind of sanctification, either because of John, who, though not yet brought forth into this light, nevertheless leaped for joy (and who would believe that this could have happened except by the working of the Holy Spirit?), or because of Jeremiah, to whom the Lord says, 'Before you came forth from the womb I sanctified you', nevertheless that sanctification by which we are made each a temple of God and all together one temple of God belongs only to the reborn, which human beings cannot be unless they have been born. And no one will end well the life into which he was born unless he is reborn before he ends it.

### Scripture references

- Luke 1:44: allusion, high confidence
- Jer 1:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 1:41; Jer 1:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.32 (CSEL 57:110; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-32).

## Letter 187.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-33
- Source: CSEL 57:110–112
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Rebirth presupposes birth from the mother, so no one can be reborn in the womb; only the reborn are built into God's temple, the Church.

### Latin text

Quod si quisquam dicit iam esse natum hominem, etiam cum adhuc est in utero matris, testimoniumque adhibet ex euangelio, quia dictum est ad Ioseph de praegnante uirgine domini matre; Quod enim in ea natum est, de spiritu sancto est, numquidnam huic natiuitati accedit secunda natiuitas? alioquin non erit iam secunda sed tertia. dominus autem cum hinc loqueretur, nisi quis, inquit, natus fuerit denuo. eam scilicet computans primam natiuitatem, quae fit matre pariente, non concipiente atque praegnante, quae fit ex ea, non quae fit in ea. neque enim renatum dicimus hominem, quem mater peperit, tamquam iterum natus sit, qui iam semel fuerat natus in utero, sed illa natiuitate non computata, quae grauidam facit, natus dicitur homo partu, ut possit renasci ex aqua et spiritu. secundum quam ex matre natiuitatem etiam ipse dominus in Bethleem Iudaeae dicitur natus. si igitur homo regenerari per gratiam spiritus in utero potest, quoniam restat illi adhuc nasci, renascitur ergo, antequam nascitur. quod fieri nullo modo potest. proinde in compagem corporis Christi tamquam in uiuam structuram templi dei, quae est eius ecclesia, nati homines non ex operibus iustitiae, quae facturi sunt, sed renascendo per gratiam transferuntur tamquam de massa ruinae ad aedificii firmamentum. praeter hoc enim aedificium, quod beatificandum construitur ad aeternam habitationem dei, uita hominis omnis infelix et mors est potius appellanda quam uita. quisquis ergo habitabitur deo, ne ira dei maneat super eum, ab hoc corpore, ab hoc templo, ab hac natiuitate non erit alienus. omnis autem non renatus alienus est.

### English translation (Claude)

But if anyone says that a human being is already born even while still in the mother's womb, and brings forward as testimony from the Gospel what was said to Joseph about the pregnant Virgin, the Lord's mother, 'For what is born in her is of the Holy Spirit', is a second birth then added to this birth? Otherwise it will no longer be the second but the third. But when the Lord spoke about this, he said, 'Unless one is born again', clearly counting as the first birth the one that happens when the mother gives birth, not when she conceives and is pregnant, the birth that is from her, not the one that is in her. For we do not call the child whom the mother has borne 'reborn', as if he were born again who had already been born once in the womb; rather, not counting that birth which makes a woman pregnant, a human being is said to be born by childbirth, so that he may be reborn of water and the Spirit. According to this birth from his mother the Lord himself is said to have been born in Bethlehem of Judea. If, then, a human being can be regenerated by the grace of the Spirit in the womb, since it still remains for him to be born, he is reborn before he is born, which can by no means happen. Accordingly, human beings once born are transferred into the framework of the body of Christ, as into the living structure of the temple of God, which is his Church, not by works of righteousness that they will do, but by being reborn through grace, as from a mass of ruin to the solid foundation of the building. For apart from this building, which is being constructed to be made blessed as God's eternal dwelling, every human life is unhappy and should be called death rather than life. Whoever, then, is to be indwelt by God, so that the wrath of God may not remain on him, will not be a stranger to this body, this temple, this birth. And everyone not reborn is a stranger to it.

### Scripture references

- Matt 1:20: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:3: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 2:1: allusion, high confidence
- Titus 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:36: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 1:20; John 3:3, 5; Matt 2:1; Titus 3:5; John 3:36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.33 (CSEL 57:110–112; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-33).

## Letter 187.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-34
- Source: CSEL 57:112–113
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The righteous of old were saved by the same faith in Christ, then hidden and now revealed, even those who lived before circumcision.

### Latin text

Sacramentum porro regenerationis nostrae manifestum esse noluit manifestatus mediator. erat autem antiquis iustis aliquod occultum. cum tamen et illi eadem fide salui fierent, quae futura erat suo tempore reuelanda. non enim audemus fideles temporis nostri praeferre amicis dei, per quos nobis ista prophetata sunt, cum deum Abraham et deum Isaac et deum Iacob ita se deus esse commendet, ut hoc dicat suum nomen in aeternum. quod si circumcisio antiquis sanctis pro baptismo fuisse creditur, quid respondebitur de his, qui, antequam hoc praeceptum esset, deo placuerunt non tamen sine fide, quia sine fide, ut scriptum est ad Hebraeos, inpossibile est placere? habentes autem, inquit apostolus, eundem spiritum fidei, propter quod scriptum est: Credidi, propter quod et locutus sum, et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. non diceret eundem. nisi et illorum idem ipse esset spiritus fidei. sicut autem illi, quando idem sacramentum occultum erat, credebant Christi incarnationem futuram, sic et nos credimus factam. et a nobis autem et ab illis futurus expectatur ad iudicium eius aduentus; non est enim aliud dei mysterium nisi Christus, in quo oportet uiuificari mortuos in Adam. quia, sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur, quem ad modum superius disseruimus.

### English translation (Claude)

The mediator, when he was made manifest, willed the sacrament of our regeneration to be manifest; but to the righteous of old it was somewhat hidden, although they too were saved by the same faith, which was to be revealed in its own time. For we do not dare to rank the faithful of our time above the friends of God through whom these things were prophesied to us, since God so commends himself as the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob that he says this is his name for ever. And if circumcision is believed to have served the ancient saints in place of baptism, what will be answered about those who pleased God before this command was given, yet not without faith, since without faith, as is written to the Hebrews, it is impossible to please him? 'But having', says the apostle, 'the same spirit of faith, according to what is written, I believed, therefore I spoke, we too believe, and therefore we speak.' He would not say 'the same' unless the same spirit of faith had been theirs too. And just as they, when the same sacrament was hidden, believed that the incarnation of Christ was to come, so we believe it has happened. And both by us and by them his coming to judgment is awaited as future; for there is no other mystery of God than Christ, in whom those dead in Adam must be made alive, because 'as in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive', as we discussed above.

### Scripture references

- Exod 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:10 (115:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:2: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Exod 3:15; Heb 11:6; 2 Cor 4:13 (Ps 116:10, 115:10 LXX/Vulg.); Col 2:2; 1 Cor 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.34 (CSEL 57:112–113; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-34).

## Letter 187.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-35
- Source: CSEL 57:113
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God dwells only in the reborn, his true temple, of which the tabernacle and Solomon's temple were signs.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem deus. qui ubique praesens est et ubique totus, non in omnibus inhabitat sed in eis tantum, quos effecit beatissimum templum suum uel beatissima templa sua eruens eos a potestate tenebrarum et transferens in regnum filii caritatis suae, quod incipit a regeneratione. aliter autem dicitur templum eius in significatione, cum fit per manus hominum de rebus inanimis sicut tabernaculum lignis, uelis. pellibus atque huius modi mobilibus, sicut etiam per Salomonem regem templum lapidibus, lignis, metallis, aliter uero re ipsa uera, quae illis significationibus figurata est. unde dicitur: Et uos tamquam lapides uiui aedificamini domus spiritalis, et unde item scriptum est: Nos enim templa dei uiui sumus, sicut deus dicit, quoniam inhabitabo in illis et inambulabo et ero illorum deus et ipsi erunt mihi plebs.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason God, who is present everywhere and whole everywhere, does not dwell in all, but only in those whom he has made his most blessed temple, or his most blessed temples, rescuing them from the power of darkness and transferring them into the kingdom of the Son of his love, which begins from regeneration. He is said to have a temple in one way as a sign, when it is made by human hands from inanimate things, like the tabernacle of wood, curtains, skins and such movable things, and like the temple built by King Solomon of stones, wood and metals; but in another way in the very reality that was prefigured by those signs. Hence it is said, 'And you, like living stones, are built up as a spiritual house'; and again it is written, 'For we are temples of the living God, as God says: I will dwell in them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.'

### Scripture references

- Col 1:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 2:5: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 26:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 1:13; 1 Pet 2:5; 2 Cor 6:16 (Lev 26:12).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.35 (CSEL 57:113; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-35).

## Letter 187.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-36
- Source: CSEL 57:113–114
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Miracles done by those outside the temple, like the exorcist who did not follow Jesus, or graces given to Cornelius before baptism, come from God's general presence.

### Latin text

Nec mouere nos debet. quod per quosdam ad hoc templum non pertinentes uel nondum pertinentes. id est in quibus non habitat uel nondum habitat deus, aliquid uirtutis operatur sicut per illum, qui in nomine Christi expellebat daemonia. cum Christum non sequeretur, quem permitti iussit propter multis utilem commendationem nominis sui. multos quoque ait sibi in nouissima die dicturos: In nomine tuo uirtutes multas fecimus, quibus utique non responderet: Non uos noui, si ad templum dei, quod inhabitando beatificat. pertinerent. Cornelius etiam centurio antequam regeneratione incorporaretur huic templo, missum ad se angelum uidit auditque dicentem, quod exauditae sint orationes eius et elemosynae acceptae. agit enim haec deus tamquam ubique praesens uel per sanctos angelos suos.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it disturb us that some power is worked through certain people who do not belong, or do not yet belong, to this temple, that is, in whom God does not dwell or does not yet dwell; as through the man who cast out demons in Christ's name, though he did not follow Christ, whom he ordered to be allowed because the commending of his name was useful to many. He also says that many will say to him on the last day, 'In your name we did many mighty works', to whom he would certainly not answer, 'I do not know you', if they belonged to the temple of God which he makes blessed by indwelling. Cornelius too, the centurion, before he was incorporated into this temple by regeneration, saw an angel sent to him and heard him say that his prayers had been heard and his alms accepted. For God does these things as present everywhere, or through his holy angels.

### Scripture references

- Mark 9:38: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 9:49: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:22: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:23: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Mark 9:38–39, Luke 9:49–50; Matt 7:22–23; Acts 10:3–4, 31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.36 (CSEL 57:113–114; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-36).

## Letter 187.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-37
- Source: CSEL 57:114–115
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jeremiah's sanctification in the womb is best understood as predestination, as when the Gospel calls the unbaptized Gentiles 'children of God' before they are gathered into one.

### Latin text

Nam illa, priusquam exiret de uulua. sanctificatio Hieremiae, quamquam nonnulli hoc in typum saluatoris accipiant, qui regeneratione non eguit, tamen, etiam si de ipso propheta accipiatur, potest et secundum praedestinationem non inconuenienter intellegi, sicut filios dei appellat euangelium nondum regeneratos, ubi Caiphas cum de domino dixisset: Expedit nobis, ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat, mox et euangelista secutus adiunxit: Hoc autem a semet ipso non dixit: sed cum esset pontifex anni illius, prophetauit, quia Iesus moriturus erat pro gente et non tantum pro gente, sed et ut filios dei, qui erant dispersi, congregaret in unum. filios dei appellauit utique praeter Hebraeam gentem in ceteris etiam omnibus gentibus constitutos nondum fideles. nondum baptizatos. quo modo ergo dei filios nisi secundum praedestinationem. secundum quam et apostolus dicit, quod elegerit nos deus in Christo ante constitutionem mundi? illa uero in unum congregatio factura eos erat filios dei. neque enim in unum dicturus est aliquem corporalem locum, cum de tali uocatione gentium propheta praedixerit: Et adorabunt eum unusquisque de loco suo omnes insulae gentium, sed congregaret in unum dictum est in unum spiritum et in unum corpus, cuius unum caput est Christus. talis congregatio aedificatio est templi dei. talem congregationem non generatio carnalis sed regeneratio spiritalis facit.

### English translation (Claude)

As for that sanctification of Jeremiah before he came forth from the womb, although some take it as a type of the Saviour, who did not need regeneration, yet even if it is taken of the prophet himself, it can quite fittingly be understood according to predestination, just as the Gospel calls 'children of God' those not yet regenerated. For when Caiaphas had said of the Lord, 'It is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and not the whole nation perish', the evangelist went on at once to add: 'He did not say this of himself, but being high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus was to die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but also to gather into one the children of God who were scattered.' He certainly called 'children of God' those placed, besides the Hebrew nation, among all the other nations as well, not yet believers, not yet baptized. How then children of God, except according to predestination, according to which the apostle too says that God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world? It was that gathering into one that would make them children of God. For 'into one' is not going to mean some bodily place, since the prophet foretold of such a calling of the Gentiles, 'And they shall worship him, each from his own place, all the islands of the nations'; but 'gather into one' was said meaning into one Spirit and into one body, whose one head is Christ. Such a gathering is the building of the temple of God. Such a gathering is made not by carnal generation but by spiritual regeneration.

### Scripture references

- Jer 1:5: allusion, high confidence
- John 11:50: quotation, high confidence
- John 11:51: quotation, high confidence
- John 11:52: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 1:4: allusion, high confidence
- Zeph 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jer 1:5; John 11:50–52; Eph 1:4; Zeph 2:11; Eph 4:4; Col 1:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.37 (CSEL 57:114–115; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-37).

## Letter 187.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-38
- Source: CSEL 57:115–116
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God dwells in his temple, the Church, tossed like Noah's ark in this world, and will reign in it for ever.

### Latin text

Habitat itaque in singulis deus tamquam in templis suis et in omnibus simul in unum congregatis tamquam in templo suo. quod templum quamdiu sicut arca Noe in hoc saeculo fluctuat, fit, quod in psalmo scriptum est: Dominus diluuium inhabitat, quamuis et propter multos in omnibus gentibus populos fidelium, quos aquarum nomine Apocalypsis significat, possit congruenter intellegi dominus diluuium inhabitat. sequitur autem: Et sedebit dominus rex in aeternam. utique in ipso templo suo iam in uita aeterna post fluctuationem huius saeculi constituto. deus igitur. qui ubique praesens est et ubique totus praesens, nec ubique habitans sed in templo suo, cui per gratiam benignus est et propitius: capitur autem habitans ab aliis amplius ab aliis minus.

### English translation (Claude)

God dwells, then, in individuals as in his temples, and in all gathered together into one as in his temple. As long as this temple tosses on the waves in this world like Noah's ark, what is written in the psalm comes about: 'The Lord dwells in the flood'; though because of the many peoples of believers in all nations, whom the Apocalypse signifies by the name of waters, 'the Lord dwells in the flood' can also fittingly be understood. And it goes on: 'And the Lord will sit as king for ever', certainly in his temple itself, then established in eternal life after the tossing of this world. God, then, is present everywhere and present whole everywhere, yet not dwelling everywhere but in his temple, to which by grace he is kind and gracious; and as indweller he is received by some more fully and by others less.

### Scripture references

- Ps 29:10 (28:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rev 17:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 29:10 (28:10); Rev 17:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.38 (CSEL 57:115–116; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-38).

## Letter 187.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-39
- Source: CSEL 57:116
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The fullness of the divinity dwells 'bodily' in Christ either as reality contrasted with shadow or because his body is God's temple.

### Latin text

De ipso uero capite nostro apostolus ait: Quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo diuinitatis corporaliter. non ideo corporaliter, quia corporeus est deus. sed aut uerbo translato usus est, tamquam in templo manu facto non corporaliter sed umbraliter habitauerit, id est praefigurantibus signis — nam illas omnes obseruationes umbras futurorum uocat etiam ipso translato uocabulo; summus enim deus. sicut scriptum est. non in manufactis templis habitat —, aut certe corporaliter dictum est, quia et in Christi corpore. quod adsumpsit ex uirgine, tamquam in templo habitat deus. hinc est enim, quod Iudaeis signum petentibus cum dixisset: Soluite templum hoc et in triduo resuscitabo illud, euangelista. quid hoc esset. consequenter exponens ait: Hoc autem dicebat de templo corporis sui.

### English translation (Claude)

Of our head himself the apostle says: 'For in him dwells all the fullness of the divinity bodily.' Not 'bodily' because God is bodily; but either he used the word figuratively, as though in the temple made with hands God dwelt not bodily but in shadow, that is, by prefiguring signs (for he calls all those observances shadows of things to come, using this very word figuratively; for the most high God, as it is written, does not dwell in temples made with hands); or else 'bodily' is said because God dwells as in a temple in the body of Christ, which he took from the Virgin. Hence it is that when the Jews asked for a sign and he said, 'Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up', the evangelist, explaining what this meant, went on to say: 'But he was speaking of the temple of his body.'

### Scripture references

- Col 2:9: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 7:48: quotation, high confidence
- John 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- John 2:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:9, 17; Acts 7:48; John 2:19, 21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.39 (CSEL 57:116; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-39).

## Letter 187.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-40
- Source: CSEL 57:116–118
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ differs from the greatest saints not only by the fullness of divinity dwelling in him but by the singular union of his humanity with the Word in one person, a pure grace.

### Latin text

Quid ergo est? hocine interesse arbitramur inter caput et membra cetera, quod in quolibet quamuis praecipuo membro uelut in aliquo magno propheta aut apostolo quamuis diuinitas habitet, non tamen sicut in capite. quod est Christus, omnis plenitudo diuinitatis? nam et in nostro corpore inest sensus singulis membris sed non tantus quantus in capite. ubi prorsus omnis est quinquepertitus: ibi enim et uisus est et auditus et olfactus et gustus et tactus. in ceteris autem solus est tactus. an etiam praeter hoc, quod tamquam in templo in illo corpore habitat omnis plenitudo diuinitatis, est aliud. quod intersit inter illud caput et cuiuslibet membri excellentiam? est plane. quod singulari quadam susceptione hominis illius una facta est persona cum uerbo. de nullo enim sanctorum dici potuit aut potest aut poterit: Verbum caro factum est, nullus sanctorum qualibet praestantia gratiae unigeniti nomen accepit, ut, quod est ipsum dei uerbum ante saecula. hoc simul cum adsumpto homine diceretur. singularis ergo est illa susceptio nec cum hominibus aliquibus sanctis quantalibet sapientia et sanctitate praestantibus ullo modo potest esse communis. ubi diuinae gratiae satis perspicuum clarumque documentum est. quis enim tam sit sacrilegus, ut audeat adfirmare aliquam posse animam per meritum liberi arbitrii. ut alter sit Christus. efficere? ut ergo ad personam uerbi unigeniti pertineret, quo pacto per liberum arbitrium communiter omnibus et naturaliter datum una sola anima meruisset, nisi hoc singularis gratia praestitisset. quam fas est praedicare, de qua nefas est uelle iudicare?

### English translation (Claude)

What then? Do we think the difference between the head and the other members is this, that although divinity dwells in any member, however eminent, such as some great prophet or apostle, yet not all the fullness of divinity as in the head, which is Christ? For in our body too there is sensation in each member, but not as much as in the head, where it is wholly present in its fivefold form: for there are sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch, while in the other members there is touch alone. Or is there also, besides the fact that all the fullness of divinity dwells in that body as in a temple, something else that makes the difference between that head and the excellence of any member? There plainly is: that by a singular taking up of that man, one person was made with the Word. For of none of the saints could it be said, or can it be said, or will it be said, 'The Word became flesh'; none of the saints, by whatever excellence of grace, received the name of Only-begotten, so that what the Word of God himself is before the ages would be said of him together with the man taken up. That taking up, then, is singular, and can in no way be shared with any holy men, however excellent in wisdom and holiness. And here is a sufficiently clear and evident proof of divine grace. For who would be so sacrilegious as to dare to assert that any soul could, by the merit of free choice, bring it about that it should be another Christ? How then could one soul alone have merited to belong to the person of the only-begotten Word by a free choice given to all in common and by nature, unless a singular grace had granted it, a grace which it is right to proclaim and wrong to wish to judge?

### Scripture references

- Col 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:9; John 1:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.40 (CSEL 57:116–118; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-40).

## Letter 187.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-41
- Source: CSEL 57:118–119
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes: think of God's presence without bodily images, of his dwelling as the gathering of the saints, and of Christ as everywhere as God and in heaven as man.

### Latin text

Haec si pro uiribus nostris, quantum dominus adiuuit. rite tractauimus, quando deum ubique praesentem et non spatiis distantibus quasi aliqua mole uel distentione diffusum sed ubique totum cogitare te extendis, auerte mentem ab omnibus imaginibus corporum, quas humana cogitatio uoluere consueuit. non enim sic sapientia, non iustitia, non sic denique caritas cogitatur, de qua scriptum est: Deus caritas est. cum uero eius habitationem cogitas, unitatem cogita congregationemque sanctorum maxime in caelis, ubi propterea praecipue dicitur habitare, quia ibi fit uoluntas eius perfecta eorum. in quibus habitat, oboedientia; deinde in terra, ubi aedificans habitat domum suam in fine saeculi dedicandam. Christum autem dominum nostrum unigenitum dei filium aequalem patri eundemque hominis filium, quo maior est pater, et ubique totum praesentem esse non dubites tamquam deum et in eodem templo dei esse tamquam inhabitantem deum et in loco aliquo caeli propter ueri corporis modum. sed cum me delectat loqui tecum, nescio, utrum seruauerim sermonis sufficientis modum, quasi diuturnum silentium loquacitate compensem. uerum quia religione et beniuolentia, qua me praeoccupasti. ita inuisceratus es cordi meo, ut tamquam cum amico uere conloquar, quicquid in opere stili nostri utiliter laboratum esse cognoscis, deo gratias age: si qua autem uitia mea perspicis, ut carissimus amicus ignosce eadem scilicet sinceritate dilectionis mihi optans medicinam, qua concedis et ueniam.

### English translation (Claude)

If we have dealt with these matters properly according to our strength, as far as the Lord has helped, then when you stretch yourself to think of God as present everywhere, and not spread out through spaces set apart as if by some bulk or extension but whole everywhere, turn your mind away from all the images of bodies that human thought is accustomed to turn over. For wisdom is not thought of in that way, nor righteousness, nor finally love, of which it is written, 'God is love.' And when you think of his dwelling, think of the unity and gathering of the saints, above all in heaven, where he is especially said to dwell because there his will is done by the perfect obedience of those in whom he dwells; and then on earth, where he dwells while building his house, to be dedicated at the end of the world. And do not doubt that Christ our Lord, the only-begotten Son of God, equal to the Father, and the same the Son of Man, than whom the Father is greater, is both present whole everywhere as God and in the same temple of God as the indwelling God, and in some place of heaven because of the mode of a true body. But since I delight in speaking with you, I do not know whether I have kept the measure of a sufficient discourse, as if making up for a long silence with talkativeness. But since by the devotion and kindness with which you anticipated me you have so entered my heart that I speak with you as with a true friend, whatever you recognize as usefully worked out in the labour of our pen, give thanks to God; and if you see any faults of mine, forgive them as a very dear friend, wishing me healing with the same sincerity of love with which you grant me pardon.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:10: allusion, medium confidence
- John 14:28: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 4:8, 16; Matt 6:10; John 14:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 187.41 (CSEL 57:118–119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/187-29/#p-187-41).

## Letter 188.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-1
- Source: CSEL 57:119–120
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Alypius and Augustine write to the widow Juliana, rejoicing that her daughter Demetrias, after their exhortation, chose consecrated virginity instead of marriage.

### Latin text

Grate admodum nobis iucundeque accidit, ut simul nos constitutos apud Hipponem tuae reuerentiae litterae reperirent, quibus haec rescripta pariter redderemus cognita uestra incolumitate gaudentes uicissimque nostram, quam uobis caram esse confidimus, mutua dilectione nuntiantes, domina debitis in Christo officiis honoranda et merito inlustris filia. scire autem uos optime scimus, quantum nobis debeamus religionis affectum quantaque nobis et apud deum et inter homines sit cura de nobis. licet enim uos per litteras primum, deinde etiam praesentia corporali pia et catholica, hoc est uera membra Christi exiguitas nostra cognouerit, tamen etiam per ministerium nostrum, cum accepissetis uerbum auditus dei, sicut dicit apostolus, accepistis non ut uerbum hominum sed, sicut est uere, uerbum dei. cuius ministerii nostri adiuuante gratia et misericordia saluatoris in domo uestra tantus fructus exortus est, ut humanis nuptiis iam paratis sancta Demetrias spiritalem sponsi illius praeferret amplexum, cui specioso prae filiis hominum ad habendam spiritus uberiorem fecunditatem nec amittendam carnis integritatem uirgines nubunt. nesciremus autem, quem ad modum nostra illa tunc exhortatio a fideli et nobili uirgine fuisset accepta, nisi nobis profectis, cum post paululum professa fuisset sanctimoniam uirginalem, hoc ingens dei donum, quod per seruos quidem suos plantat et rigat, sed per se ipsum dat incrementum, nobis operariis prouenisse uestrarum litterarum laetissimo nuntio et ueraci testimonio disceremus.

### English translation (Claude)

It was very welcome and pleasant to us that the letter of Your Reverence found us together at Hippo, so that we could send this reply jointly, rejoicing to learn of your well-being and in turn telling you, with mutual love, of ours, which we trust is dear to you, lady worthy to be honoured with the respect due in Christ, and deservedly illustrious daughter. We know very well that you know how much devout affection we owe you, and how great a care we have for you both before God and among men. For although our littleness came to know you first through letters and then also in bodily presence as devout and Catholic, that is, true members of Christ, yet it was also through our ministry that, when you received the word of God which you heard, as the apostle says, you received it not as the word of men but, as it truly is, the word of God. From this ministry of ours, by the help of the Saviour's grace and mercy, so great a fruit has arisen in your house that, when a human marriage had already been arranged, the holy Demetrias preferred the spiritual embrace of that Bridegroom, fairer than the sons of men, to whom virgins are wedded so as to have a richer fruitfulness of spirit without losing the integrity of the flesh. But we would not have known how that exhortation of ours was then received by the faithful and noble virgin, had we not learned, after we had left, when shortly afterwards she had professed holy virginity, by the most joyful news and truthful testimony of your letter, that this great gift of God, who plants and waters through his servants but gives the growth himself, had come about with us as his labourers.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 2:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 45:2 (44:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:9: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 188, from Alypius and Augustine to Anicia Juliana, mother of Demetrias (AD 416). 1 Thess 2:13; Ps 45:2 (44:3); 1 Cor 3:6–9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.1 (CSEL 57:119–120; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-1).

## Letter 188.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-2
- Source: CSEL 57:120–121
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains his concern to warn Juliana against teachings contrary to grace, quoting her grateful reply.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, nemo nos inprobos dixerit, si in nobis admonendis, ut contraria gratiae dei dogmata deuitetis, necessitudine sumus propensiore solliciti. nam licet nos apostolus non solum opportune uerum etiam importune praedicando uerbo instare praecipiat, non tamen in eorum hominum numero nos habemus, quibus sermo uel pagina nostra importuna uideatur, quando id, quod ad sanam doctrinam non pertinet, uos ut uigilanter euitetis adloquimur. hinc ergo est. quod admonitionem nostram tam grato animo suscepistis, ut in epistula tua, ad quam nunc rescribimus, diceres: Sane, quod me hortatur reuerentia uestra, ne aures indulgeam his hominibus, qui prauis tractatibus uenerandam fidem saepe corrumpunt, gratias uberes ago tam piae admonitioni.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, let no one call us impertinent if, because of this closer bond, we are anxious to warn you to avoid teachings contrary to the grace of God. For although the apostle commands us to press on with preaching the word not only in season but also out of season, we do not count you among those to whom our speech or page might seem out of season when we urge you to watch carefully and avoid what does not belong to sound doctrine. That is why you received our warning with such gratitude that you said in your letter, to which we now reply: 'I give abundant thanks for so devout a warning, in that Your Reverence urges me not to lend my ears to those men who often corrupt the venerable faith with perverse treatises.'

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Titus 2:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 4:2; Titus 2:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.2 (CSEL 57:120–121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-2).

## Letter 188.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-3
- Source: CSEL 57:121–122
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Juliana that the error of those who limit grace to nature and teaching and deny that love is God's gift is not small.

### Latin text

Quod itaque adiungis et dicis: Sed nouerit sacerdotium uestrum longe me ac domunculam meam ab huius modi personis esse discretam: omnisque familia nostra adeo catholicam sequitur fidem, ut in nullam haeresim aliquando deuiauerit nec umquam lapsa sit, non dico in eas sectas, quae uix expiantur, sed nec in eas, quae paruos habere uidentur errores, hoc est, quod nos magis magisque compellit non tacere apud uos de his. qui etiam illa, quae sana sunt. uitiare conantur. domum enim uestram non paruam Christi ecclesiam deputamus. nec sane paruus est error illorum. qui putant ex nobis ipsis nos habere, si quid iustitiae, continentiae, pietatis. castitatis in nobis est, eo quod ita nos condiderit deus, ut ultra. praeter quod nobis reuelat scientiam, nihil nos adiuuet, ut ea, quae facienda discendo nouimus, etiam diligendo faciamus, naturam scilicet atque doctrinam definientes tantum modo esse dei gratiam et adiutorium, ut iuste recteque uiuamus. ad habendam uero bonam uoluntatem. ubi est hoc ipsum, quod iuste uiuimus, et ipsam caritatem. quae in omnibus dei donis ita excellit, ut etiam deus dicta sit, qua una impletur in nobis, si quid diuinae legis et admonitionis implemus, nolunt nos diuinitus adiuuari, sed nos ipsos dicunt arbitrio proprio nobis ad ista sufficere. non uobis uideatur error iste mediocris, profiteri uelle Christianos nec uelle audire apostolum Christi, qui cum dixisset: Caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris, ne quisquam eam habere nonnisi per proprium putaret arbitrium, continuo subiunxit: Per spiritum sanctum. qui datus est nobis. hanc esse magnam gratiam saluatoris, qui ascendit in altum, captiuauit captiuitatem et dedit dona hominibus, quisquis nondum confitetur, quantum et quam exitiabiliter erret, intellegis.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you add, saying, 'But let Your Priesthood know that I and my little household are far removed from such persons; and our whole family so follows the Catholic faith that it has never strayed into any heresy, nor ever fallen, I do not say into those sects which can scarcely be expiated, but not even into those which seem to have small errors', this is what compels us more and more not to be silent with you about those who try to corrupt even what is sound. For we regard your house as no small church of Christ. And the error of those is certainly not small who think that whatever righteousness, self-control, piety or chastity there is in us, we have from ourselves, on the ground that God so created us that beyond revealing knowledge to us he gives us no further help to do with love what we have learned by teaching that we should do; defining, that is, that nature and teaching alone are the grace and help of God for living justly and rightly. But for having a good will, in which our very living justly consists, and love itself, which so excels among all God's gifts that it is even called God, and by which alone whatever we fulfil of the divine law and admonition is fulfilled in us, they will not have us helped by God, but say that we are sufficient for these things by our own choice. Do not think this a minor error: to wish to profess oneself a Christian and not to wish to hear the apostle of Christ, who, having said, 'The love of God has been poured into our hearts', lest anyone think he had it only through his own choice, immediately added, 'through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.' You understand how greatly and how ruinously anyone errs who does not yet confess that this is the great grace of the Saviour, who ascended on high, led captivity captive, and gave gifts to men.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 68:18 (67:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 John 4:8; Rom 5:5; Eph 4:8 (Ps 68:18, 67:19 LXX/Vulg.).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.3 (CSEL 57:121–122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-3).

## Letter 188.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-4
- Source: CSEL 57:122–123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes the book written to Demetrias, which tells her that her spiritual riches can come only from herself.

### Latin text

Quo modo ergo a uobis. quibus tantam dilectionem debemus, admonendis, ut talia caueatis, dissimulare possemus, cum legissemus librum, quem ad sanctam Demetriadem quisnam scripserit uel, utrum ad uos peruenerit, uestris potius rescriptis nosse uolumus. in quo libro, si fas est, legat uirgo Christi, unde credat uirginalem suam sanctitatem omnesque spiritales diuitias non nisi ex se ipsa sibi esse, atque ita. priusquam sit plenissime beata, discat deo esse - quod absit! — ingrata. uerba enim ad illam scripta in eodem libro sunt ista: Habes ergo et hic, inquit, per quae merito praeponaris aliis, immo hinc magis; nam corporalis nobilitas atque opulentia tuorum intellegentur esse non tua, spiritales uero diuitias nullus tibi praeter te conferre poterit. in his ergo iure laudanda. in his merito ceteris praeferenda es, quae nisi ex te et in te esse non possunt.

### English translation (Claude)

How then could we pretend not to see, and fail to warn you, to whom we owe such love, to beware of such things, when we had read the book written to the holy Demetrias? Who wrote it, and whether it has reached you, we would rather learn from your reply. In that book, if it may be permitted, the virgin of Christ reads that she should believe her virginal holiness and all her spiritual riches to come to her from herself alone, and so, before she is fully blessed, learn to be (God forbid!) ungrateful to God. For these are the words written to her in that book: 'You have here too, then,' he says, 'reasons for which you may rightly be ranked above others, indeed all the more here; for your bodily nobility and wealth will be understood to be your family's, not yours, but no one but yourself can confer spiritual riches on you. In these, then, you are rightly to be praised, in these you deserve to be preferred to others, for they can exist only from you and in you.'

### Translation notes

- The book is Pelagius's Letter to Demetrias (413/414); the quotation is from its chapter 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.4 (CSEL 57:122–123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-4).

## Letter 188.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-5
- Source: CSEL 57:123
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Saying spiritual goods are 'in' Demetrias is true, but saying they are 'from' her alone is poison; Paul teaches that the treasure is God's.

### Latin text

Cernis nempe. quanta in his uerbis sit cauenda pernicies. eam utique, quod dictum est: Non possunt esse ista bona nisi in te, optime et uerissime dictum est: iste plane cibus est; quod uero ait non nisi ex te hoc omnino uirus est. absit, ut haec libenter audiat uirgo Christi, quae pie intellegit propriam paupertatem cordis humani et ideo illic nisi sponsi sui donis nescit ornari. audiat ergo potius apostolum dicentem: Desponsaui uos uni uiro uirginem castam exhibere Christo. timeo autem, ne, sicut serpens Euam seduxit in uersutia sua, sic et uestrae mentes corrumpantur a castitate, quae est in Christo, et propterea de his quoque spiritalibus diuitiis non istum, qui dicit: Nullus tibi eas praeter te conferre potest et: Nisi ex te et in te esse non possunt, sed illum audiat. qui dicit: Habemus thesaurum istum in uasis fictilibus, ut eminentia uirtutis sit dei et non ex nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

You surely see how great a danger is to be guarded against in these words. Certainly the statement that these goods can exist only in you is excellently and most truly said: that is plain food. But his saying 'only from you', that is pure poison. Far be it that the virgin of Christ should gladly hear these things, she who devoutly understands the poverty proper to the human heart and therefore knows no adornment there except the gifts of her Bridegroom. Let her rather hear the apostle saying: 'I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear lest, as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so your minds may be corrupted from the chastity that is in Christ.' And therefore about these spiritual riches too let her listen not to him who says, 'No one but yourself can confer them on you', and, 'They can exist only from you and in you', but to him who says, 'We have this treasure in earthen vessels, so that the surpassing power may be God's and not from us.'

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:2: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:3: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 11:2–3; 2 Cor 4:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.5 (CSEL 57:123; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-5).

## Letter 188.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-6
- Source: CSEL 57:123–124
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Virginity is God's gift, as Paul and Christ teach; Demetrias's virginity, surpassing her mother's state, is truly theirs but not from them, like the daily bread we ask for.

### Latin text

De ipsa quoque sacra continentia uirginali, quod non sibi sit ex se ipsa, sed sit dei donum quamuis credenti uolentique conlatum, eundem audiat ueracem piumque doctorem, qui, cum hinc ageret, ait: Vellem omnes esse sicut me ipsum; sed unusquisque proprium donum habet a deo alius sic alius autem sic. audiat etiam ipsum non tantum suum sed uniuersae ecclesiae unicum sponsum de tali castitate atque integritate dicentem: Non omnes capiunt uerbum hoc. sed quibus datum est, ut intellegat ex eo, quod habet tam magnum bonum atque praeclarum, se potius deo et domino nostro gratias agere debere quam cuiusquam uerba, quod uelut ex se ipsa id habeat, ut non dicamus assentantis adulatoris, ne de occultis hominum temere iudicare uideamur, certe errantis laudatoris audire. omne quippe datum optimum et omne donum perfectum, sicut dicit etiam apostolus Iacobus, desursum est descendens a patre luminum. hinc ergo et sancta uirginitas. qua te filia uolentem gaudentemque uicit natu posterior. actu prior. genere ex te, honore ante te, aetate subsequens, sanctitate praecedens, in qua etiam tuum esse coepit, quod in te esse non potuit. illa quippe carnaliter non nupsit, ut non tantum sibi sed etiam tibi ultra te spiritaliter augeretur, quoniam et tu ea compensatione minor illa es, quod ita nupsisti, ut nasceretur. haec dei dona sunt et uestra quidem sunt sed non ex uobis; habetis enim thesaurum istum in terrenis corporibus et adhuc fragilibus tamquam in uasis fictilibus, ut eminentia uirtutis sit dei et non ex uobis. nec miremini, quia dicimus et uestra esse et ex uobis non esse; nam et panem cotidianum dicimus nostrum, sed tamen addimus: Da nobis, ne putetur lex nobis

### English translation (Claude)

About holy virginal continence itself, too, that it is not hers from herself but is a gift of God, though conferred on one who believes and wills, let her hear the same truthful and devout teacher, who says, when dealing with this: 'I would that all were as I myself am; but each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and another of another.' Let her hear also the one Bridegroom, not of herself only but of the whole Church, saying of such chastity and integrity: 'Not all receive this word, but those to whom it is given'; so that she may understand that for having so great and splendid a good she ought rather to give thanks to God our Lord than to listen to anyone's words that she has it as if from herself, words, not to say of a fawning flatterer (lest we seem to judge rashly the hidden things of men), but certainly of a mistaken praiser. For 'every best gift and every perfect gift', as the apostle James also says, 'is from above, coming down from the Father of lights.' From there, then, comes also the holy virginity by which your daughter, to your willing joy, has surpassed you: later in birth, earlier in deed; from you by descent, before you in honour; following you in age, preceding you in holiness; in her has begun to be yours what could not be in you. For she did not marry in the flesh, so that she might be increased spiritually not only for herself but also for you beyond you; since you too are less than she by this exchange, that you married so that she might be born. These are gifts of God, and they are indeed yours, but not from you; for you have this treasure in earthly and still fragile bodies, as in earthen vessels, so that the surpassing power may be God's and not from you. And do not be surprised that we say they are both yours and not from you; for we call our daily bread 'ours', yet we add 'Give us', lest it be thought to be from us.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 19:11: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 7:7; Matt 19:11; Jas 1:17; 2 Cor 4:7; Matt 6:11. The last words of the section are damaged in the digital text ('ne putetur lex nobis'); translated by sense as 'lest it be thought to be from us'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.6 (CSEL 57:123–124; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-6).

## Letter 188.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-7
- Source: CSEL 57:124–126
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Demetrias should pray and give thanks, recognizing that her goods are in her but not from her alone, since God works both the will and the deed by inspiring love.

### Latin text

Proinde, sicut scriptum est sine intermissione orate, in omnibus gratias agite; oratis enim. ut perseueranter et proficienter habeatis, gratias agitis, quia non ex uobis habetis. quis enim uos ab illa ex Adam massa mortis perditionisque discernit? nonne ille, qui uenit quaerere et saluare, quod perierat? an uero quando apostolo dicente audierit homo: Quis enim te discernit? responsurus est: Bona uoluntas mea. fides mea, iustitia mea et non continuo, quod sequitur, auditurus: Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? si autem et accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? nolumus ergo, ut uirgo sacra, cum audit uel legit: Spiritales diuitias nullus tibi praeter te conferre poterit; in his iure laudanda, in his merito ceteris praeferenda es, quae nisi ex te et in te esse non possunt. nolumus prorsus ita glorietur. quasi non acceperit. dicat quidem: In me sunt, deus, uota quae reddam laudis tibi, sed, quia in illa non etiam ex illa, meminerit etiam dicere: Domine, in uoluntate tua praestitisti decori meo uirtutem, quia etsi etiam ex illa propter arbitrium proprium, sine quo non operamur bonum, non tamen, sicut iste dixit, non nisi ex illa. proprium quippe arbitrium nisi dei gratia iuuetur, nec ipsa bona uoluntas esse in homine potest. deus est enim, inquit apostolus. qui operatur in uobis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate, non, sicut isti sentiunt, tantum modo scientiam reuelando. ut nouerimus. quid facere debeamus, sed etiam inspirando caritatem. ut ea, quae discendo nouimus. etiam diligendo faciamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, as it is written, 'Pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks': you pray that you may have these things perseveringly and with progress; you give thanks because you do not have them from yourselves. For who distinguishes you from that mass of death and perdition from Adam? Is it not he who came to seek and to save what was lost? Or when a man hears the apostle saying, 'For who distinguishes you?', will he answer, 'My good will, my faith, my righteousness', and not at once hear what follows: 'What do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as if you had not received it?' We do not wish, then, that the holy virgin, when she hears or reads, 'No one but yourself can confer spiritual riches on you; in these you are rightly to be praised, in these you deserve to be preferred to others, for they can exist only from you and in you', should boast at all as if she had not received. Let her indeed say, 'In me, O God, are the vows of praise that I will render to you'; but since they are in her, not also from her, let her remember also to say, 'Lord, by your will you gave strength to my beauty.' For although they are in some sense also from her, because of her own choice, without which we do not do good, yet not, as this man said, 'only from her'. For unless one's own choice is helped by God's grace, not even a good will can exist in a human being. 'For it is God', says the apostle, 'who works in you both to will and to work according to his good will', not, as these men think, only by revealing knowledge so that we may know what we ought to do, but also by inspiring love, so that what we have learned by teaching we may also do by loving.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 56:12 (55:13 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 30:7 (29:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:17–18; Luke 19:10; 1 Cor 4:7; Ps 56:12 (55:13); Ps 30:7 (29:8); Phil 2:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.7 (CSEL 57:124–126; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-7).

## Letter 188.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-8
- Source: CSEL 57:126–127
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Solomon knew continence was God's gift and prayed for it; Pelagius's words would make Demetrias think it comes from herself alone.

### Latin text

Nam utique nouerat ille, quam magnum bonum esset continentia, qui dicebat: Et cum scirem, quia nemo potest esse continens, nisi deus det. non solum ergo sciebat, quantum esset hoc bonum et quam desiderabiliter esset concupiscendum, uerum etiam quod nisi dante deo esse non posset; docuerat enim eum sapientia; nam hoc dicit: Et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae scire, cuius esset hoc donum. nec tamen ei scientia suffecit, sed ait: Adii dominum et deprecatus sum illum. non igitur tantum modo in hoc nos adiuuat deus, ut sciamus, quid agendum sit, uerum etiam ut amando agamus, quod discendo iam scimus. nemo itaque potest esse non solum sciens uerum etiam continens, nisi deus det unde cum iam ille haberet scientiam, precabatur, ut haberet et continentiam, ut esset et in illo, quod sciebat, quia non esset ex illo. aut si propter arbitrium proprium aliquantum et ex illo, non tamen non nisi ex illo, quia nemo esse potest continens, nisi deus det. iste autem de spiritalibus diuitiis, in quibus est utique etiam ipsa luminosa et speciosa continentia, non ait: In te et ex te esse possunt, sed ait: Nisi ex te et in te esse non possunt ut. quem ad modum non ei sunt alibi nisi in illa, sic ei non aliunde nisi ex illa esse posse credantur et ob hoc — quod miserator dominus a corde eius auertat! - sic glorietur, quasi non acceperit

### English translation (Claude)

For he certainly knew how great a good continence is who said: 'And when I knew that no one can be continent unless God gives it.' So he knew not only how great a good this is and how desirable to long for, but also that it could not exist unless God gave it; for wisdom had taught him; for he says this: 'And this very thing was a mark of wisdom, to know whose gift this was.' Yet knowledge was not enough for him, but he says: 'I went to the Lord and besought him.' God, then, does not help us only so that we may know what is to be done, but also so that we may do by loving what we already know by learning. So no one can be not only knowing but also continent unless God gives it. Hence, though he already had knowledge, he prayed to have continence also, so that what he knew might be in him, since it would not be from him; or if in some measure from him too, because of his own choice, yet not only from him, since no one can be continent unless God gives it. But this man, about spiritual riches, among which is certainly that luminous and beautiful continence, does not say, 'They can be in you and from you', but says, 'They can exist only from you and in you', so that, just as they are nowhere else than in her, so they may be believed able to come from nowhere else than from her, and for this reason (may the merciful Lord turn it from her heart!) she may boast as if she had not received.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:7: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 8:21 (an extrabiblical text on this site; quoted as Scripture by Augustine); 1 Cor 4:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.8 (CSEL 57:126–127; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-8).

## Letter 188.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-9
- Source: CSEL 57:127
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine trusts that Demetrias, if she read the book, prayed that her glory might be God and not herself.

### Latin text

Et nos quidem de sanctae uirginis disciplina et humilitate Christiana, in qua nutrita et educata est, hoc existimamus, quod, illa uerba cum legeret, si tamen legit. ingemuit et pectus humiliter tutudit ac fortassis et fleuit deumque, cui dicata et a quo sanctificata est, fidenter orauit, ut, quo modo illa non sunt uerba ipsius sed alterius, ita non sit talis et fides eius, qua se aliquid habere credat, de quo in se non in domino glorietur. nam gloria quidem eius in ipsa est non in uerbis alienis, sicut apostolus dicit: Opus autem suum probet unusquisque et tunc in semet ipso habebit gloriam et non in altero. sed absit, ut gloria sua ipsa sit et non ille, cui dicitur: Gloria mea et exaltans caput meum. ita quippe est in ea salubriter gloria eius, cum deus, qui in illa est, ipse est gloria eius. a quo habet omnia bona, quibus est bona, et habebit omnia, quibus melior erit, in quantum in hac uita melior esse poterit. et quibus perfecta erit, quando fuerit diuina gratia, non humana laude perfecta. in domino enim laudabitur anima eius, qui satiauit in bonis desiderium eius. quia et hoc desiderium ipse inspirauit, ne uirgo eius sic in aliquo bono glorietur, quasi non acceperit.

### English translation (Claude)

For our part, from the discipline of the holy virgin and the Christian humility in which she was nourished and brought up, we suppose that when she read those words, if indeed she read them, she groaned and humbly beat her breast and perhaps even wept, and confidently prayed to God, to whom she is dedicated and by whom she is sanctified, that just as those words are not her own but another's, so her faith too might not be such as to believe she has anything in which to glory in herself and not in the Lord. For her glory is indeed in herself, not in another's words, as the apostle says: 'But let each one test his own work, and then he will have his glory in himself and not in another.' But far be it that she should be her own glory, and not he to whom it is said, 'My glory, and the one who lifts up my head.' Her glory is in her healthfully when God, who is in her, is himself her glory, from whom she has all the goods by which she is good, and will have all those by which she will be better, as far as she can be better in this life, and those by which she will be perfect, when she is perfected by divine grace, not by human praise. For in the Lord shall her soul be praised, who has satisfied her desire with good things, since he also inspired this desire, so that his virgin may not glory in any good as if she had not received it.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:31: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:4: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 3:3 (3:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 34:2 (33:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:5 (102:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 1:31; Gal 6:4; Ps 3:3 (3:4); Ps 34:2 (33:3); Ps 103:5 (102:5); 1 Cor 4:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.9 (CSEL 57:127; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-9).

## Letter 188.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-10
- Source: CSEL 57:127–128
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Juliana to confirm Demetrias's disposition, noting that denying God's goodness its source offends the Trinity itself.

### Latin text

De hoc ergo eius affectu utrum non fallamur, inde nos fac potius rescribendo certiores. nam illud optime nouimus cum omnibus uestris cultores uos esse et fuisse indiuiduae trinitatis. sed non hinc solum error humanus obrepit, ut aliquid secus sentiatur de indiuidua trinitate. sunt enim et alia, in quibus perniciosissime erratur, sicuti hoc est, unde diutius fortasse, quam satis esset uestrae fideli castaeque prudentiae, in hac epistula locuti sumus. quamquam qui bonum, quod ex deo est, negat esse ex deo, nescimus, cui faciat iniuriam nisi deo ac per hoc illi utique trinitati, quod malum absit a uobis, sicut abesse credimus. absit omnino, ut tale aliquid in animo. non dicimus tuo uel sacrae uirginis filiae tuae sed in cuiusque extremi meriti famuli uel famulae uestrae liber ille fecerit, ex quo nonnulla uerba, quae facilius intellegi possent. ponenda credidimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Whether we are mistaken about this disposition of hers, please make us more certain by writing back. For we know very well that you, with all your household, are and have been worshippers of the undivided Trinity. But human error does not creep in only by thinking otherwise about the undivided Trinity. For there are other matters in which people err most ruinously, such as this one, about which we have spoken in this letter perhaps at greater length than your faithful and chaste prudence needed. And yet whoever denies that the good which is from God is from God, we do not know whom he wrongs if not God, and therefore that Trinity itself; may this evil be far from you, as we believe it is. Far be it altogether that that book should have produced any such thing in the mind, we do not say of you or of your holy virgin daughter, but of any servant of yours, man or woman, of the lowest standing. From it we thought we should quote some words which could be understood more easily.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.10 (CSEL 57:127–128; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-10).

## Letter 188.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-11
- Source: CSEL 57:128
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pelagius's apparent statements about grace are ambiguous, referring grace only to nature, teaching, forgiveness, or Christ's example.

### Latin text

Si autem diligentius intendatis etiam illa, quae ibi uidetur uelut pro gratia siue adiutorio dei dicere. sic inuenietis ambigua, ut possint referri uel ad naturam uel ad doctrinam uel ad remissionem peccatorum. nam et quod coguntur confiteri orare nos debere, ne intremus in temptationem, possunt ad hoc referre, ut hactenus nos ad id respondeant adiuuari, quatenus orantibus atque pulsantibus nobis aperiatur intellegentia ueritatis. ubi discamus, quid facere debeamus, non ut uires accipiat uoluntas nostra, quibus id, quod discimus, faciamus. et quod nobis in gratia uel adiutorio dei dicunt dominum Christum bene uiuendi propositum exemplum, ad eandem doctrinam reuocant, quia scilicet in eius exemplo discimus, quem ad modum uiuere debeamus; non autem uolunt ad hoc nos iuuari, ut, quod discendo cognoscimus, etiam diligendo faciamus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you look more carefully even at the passages where he seems to speak in favour of the grace or help of God, you will find them so ambiguous that they can be referred either to nature or to teaching or to the forgiveness of sins. For even the fact that they are forced to confess that we must pray not to enter into temptation they can refer to this: they can answer that we are helped to this extent, that when we pray and knock the understanding of the truth is opened to us, in which we may learn what we ought to do, not that our will receives strength by which to do what we learn. And when they say that the Lord Christ has been set before us as an example of good living, as part of the grace or help of God, they refer this back to the same teaching, namely that in his example we learn how we ought to live; but they will not have us helped so that what we come to know by learning we may also do by loving.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:41: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 26:41; Matt 7:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.11 (CSEL 57:128; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-11).

## Letter 188.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-12
- Source: CSEL 57:128–131
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine challenges Juliana to find in the book any confession of grace beyond nature, teaching and forgiveness, and asks whether it is Pelagius's work and whether she has it.

### Latin text

Aut certe in eodem libro inuenite aliquid. si potestis. ubi excepta natura. excepto, quod ad eandem naturam pertinet. arbitrio uoluntatis. excepta remissione peccatorum et reuelatione doctrinae tale dei adiutorium confitetur, quale confitetur ille, qui dixit: Cum scirem. quia nemo esse potest continens, nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae scire, cuius esset hoc donum, adii dominum et deprecatus sum illum. neque enim iste aut naturam precando uolebat accipere. in qua conditus erat, aut de naturali uoluntatis arbitrio satagebat, cum quo conditus erat, aut remissionem peccatorum desiderabat, qui potius continentiam, ne peccaret, optabat, uel, quid faciendum esset, scire cupiebat. cum iam se scire fateretur, cuius esset hoc donum, sed utique tantas uoluntatis uires. tantum dilectionis ardorem uolebat accipere spiritu sapientiae, qui sufficeret ad implendam magnitudinem continentiae. si ergo tale aliquid illic inuenire potueritis, uberrimas gratias agimus, si rescribendo insinuare dignemini. Satis enim dici non potest, quantum cupiamus in eorum hominum scriptis, qui propter acrimoniam atque facundiam leguntur a plurimis, apertam confessionem illius gratiae reperiri, quam uehementer commendat apostolus, qui etiam ipsius mensuram fidei, sine qua impossibile est deo placere, ex qua iustus uiuit, quae per dilectionem operatur, ante quam et sine qua omnino nulla cuiusquam bona opera existimanda sunt, quoniam omne, quod non est ex fide, peccatum est, deum dicit unicuique partitum nec sola reuelatione scientiae nos diuinitus adiuuari, ut pie iusteque uiuamus, quae sine caritate inflat, uerum etiam inspiratione caritatis ipsius. quae plenitudo legis est et quae cor nostrum. ut scientia non inflet, aedificat. sed adhuc nusquam tale aliquid in eorum litteris potuimus inuenire. Maxime autem hoc in isto libro esse uellemus, ex quo descripta illa uerba posuimus, ubi uirginem Christi ita laudans. tamquam spiritales diuitias nullus ei praeter ipsam conferre possit et tamquam nisi ex ipsa esse non possint. non uult eam in domino gloriari, sed sic gloriari, quasi non acceperit. in quo libro quamuis nec ipsius nec tuae reuerentiae nomen expresserit, tamen a matre uirginis, ut ad eam scriberet, a se postulatum esse commemorat. in quadam uero epistula sua idem Pelagius, ubi et nomen suum apertissime ponit nec nomen sacrae uirginis tacet, dicit ad eam se scripsisse et eiusdem sui operis testimonio probare nititur se gratiam dei. quam uel tacere uel negare adseritur, apertissime confiteri. sed utrum ipse sit liber, in quo de spiritalibus diuitiis illa uerba posuit. uel utrum ad uestram peruenerit sanctitatem, rescriptis uestris petimus nos dignemini facere certiores.

### English translation (Claude)

Or else find something in that book, if you can, where, apart from nature, apart from the choice of the will, which belongs to that same nature, and apart from the forgiveness of sins and the revelation of teaching, he confesses such a help of God as he confessed who said: 'When I knew that no one can be continent unless God gives it, and this very thing was a mark of wisdom, to know whose gift this was, I went to the Lord and besought him.' For he did not wish by praying to receive the nature in which he had been created, nor was he concerned about the natural choice of will with which he had been created, nor did he desire forgiveness of sins, since he was rather wishing for continence so as not to sin, nor did he long to know what was to be done, since he already confessed that he knew whose gift this was; but he certainly wished to receive, by the spirit of wisdom, such strength of will and such ardour of love as would suffice to fulfil the greatness of continence. If, then, you can find anything of this kind there, we shall give most abundant thanks if you deign to let us know by writing back. For it cannot be said enough how much we desire to find in the writings of those men who, because of their keenness and eloquence, are read by very many, an open confession of that grace which the apostle so strongly commends: who says that God has apportioned to each even the measure of faith itself, without which it is impossible to please God, by which the righteous live, which works through love, before and without which no good works of anyone at all are to be counted, since whatever is not from faith is sin; and that we are helped by God to live devoutly and justly not only by the revelation of knowledge, which without love puffs up, but also by the inspiration of love itself, which is the fulfilment of the law and which builds up our heart so that knowledge does not puff it up. But so far we have nowhere been able to find anything of the kind in their writings. Above all we should wish it to be in this book from which we have copied out and set down those words, where, praising the virgin of Christ as though no one but herself could confer spiritual riches on her and as though they could exist only from her, he does not want her to glory in the Lord but to glory as if she had not received. In that book, although he did not name either her or Your Reverence, he nevertheless mentions that he was asked by the virgin's mother to write to her. But in a certain letter of his, where the same Pelagius puts his own name quite openly and does not conceal the name of the holy virgin, he says that he wrote to her, and he tries by the testimony of this same work to prove that he confesses most openly the grace of God, which he is alleged either to pass over in silence or to deny. But whether this is the same book in which he put those words about spiritual riches, and whether it has reached Your Holiness, we ask you to deign to inform us in your reply.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:3: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 11:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 14:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:1: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:21 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 8:21 (extrabiblical on this site); Rom 12:3; Heb 11:6; Rom 1:17; Gal 5:6; Rom 14:23; 1 Cor 8:1; Rom 13:10. The letter of Pelagius naming Demetrias is lost except for fragments.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 188.12 (CSEL 57:128–131; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-188-12).

## Letter 189.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-1
- Source: CSEL 57:131
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes hastily to the general Boniface at the request of Faustus, who was travelling to him.

### Latin text

Iam rescripseram caritati tuae, sed, cum epistulae dirigendae occasio quaereretur, superuenit dilectissimus filius meus Faustus pergens ad eximietatem tuam. qui cum ipsas litteras, quas iam feceram, accepisset tuae beniuolentiae perferendas, suggessit mihi multum te desiderare, ut aliquid tibi scriberem. quod te aedificet ad sempiternam salutem, cuius tibi spes in Christo Iesu domino nostro. et quamuis mihi occupato tantum institit, ut facere non differrem, quantum scis, quod te sinceriter diligat. festinanti ergo ut occurrerem, malui festinanter aliquid scribere quam religiosum tuum desiderium retardare, domine eximie et merito insignis atque honorabilis fili.

### English translation (Claude)

I had already written to Your Charity, but while an opportunity was being sought to send the letter, my dearest son Faustus arrived on his way to Your Excellency. When he had received the letter I had already written, to deliver it to Your Kindness, he told me that you very much desired me to write you something to build you up toward eternal salvation, of which you have hope in Christ Jesus our Lord. And although I was busy, he pressed me not to put it off, as much as, you know, he sincerely loves you. So, to meet his haste, I preferred to write something hastily rather than delay your devout desire, my excellent lord and deservedly distinguished and honourable son.

### Translation notes

- Letter 189, to Boniface, tribune and later count of Africa (ca. AD 418).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.1 (CSEL 57:131; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-1).

## Letter 189.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-2
- Source: CSEL 57:131–132
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sums up his advice to Boniface in the two commandments of love, which he should grow in by prayer and good works.

### Latin text

Quod ergo breuiter possum dicere: Dilige dominum deum tuum in toto corde tuo et in tota anima tua et in tota uirtute tua, et: Dilige proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum - hoc est enim uerbum. quod breuiauit dominus super terram dicens in euangelio: In his duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet et prophetae. in hac ergo dilectione cotidie profice et orando et bene agendo. ut ipso adiuuante, qui tibi eam praecepit atque donauit. nutriatur et crescat, donec haec te perfecta perficiat. ipsa est enim caritas, quae, sicut dicit apostolus, diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis; ipsa est, de qua item dicit: Plenitudo legis caritas: ipsa est, per quam fides operatur, unde iterum dicit: Neque circumcisio quicquam ualet neque praeputium sed fides, quae per dilectionem operatur.

### English translation (Claude)

What I can say briefly, then, is this: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength', and, 'Love your neighbour as yourself.' This is the word that the Lord made short upon the earth, saying in the Gospel: 'On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.' Make progress daily, then, in this love, both by praying and by doing good, so that with the help of him who commanded it and gave it to you it may be nourished and grow, until, being perfected, it perfects you. For this is the love which, as the apostle says, 'has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us'; this is the love of which he also says, 'Love is the fulfilment of the law'; this is the love through which faith works, as he says again: 'Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:39: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 6:5: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 19:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:28: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 22:37–40 (Deut 6:5; Lev 19:18); Rom 9:28 (Isa 10:23, 'a shortened word'); Rom 5:5; Rom 13:10; Gal 5:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.2 (CSEL 57:131–132; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-2).

## Letter 189.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-3
- Source: CSEL 57:132–133
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: By love the saints and martyrs pleased God, and believers advance toward the vision of God, which surpasses all created beauty.

### Latin text

In hac omnes sancti patres nostri et patriarchae et prophetae et apostoli placuerunt deo; in hac omnes ueri martyres usque ad sanguinem contra diabolum certauerunt et, quia in eis non refriguit nec defecit, ideo uicerunt; in hac omnes boni fideles cotidie proficiunt peruenire cupientes non ad regnum mortalium sed ad regnum caelorum, non ad temporalem sed ad sempiternam hereditatem. non ad aurum et argentum sed ad diuitias incorruptibiles angelorum, non ad aliqua bona huius saeculi. in quibus cum timore uiuatur nec ea quisquam secum potest auferre, dum moritur, sed ad uidendum deum. cuius suauitas et delectatio excedit omnem non solum terrestrium uerum etiam caelestium corporum pulchritudinem, excedit omnem decorem animarum quantum libet iustarum atque sanctarum. excedit omnem speciem supernorum angelorum atque uirtutum. excedit quicquid de illo non solum dicitur, uerum etiam cogitatur. neque hanc tam magnam promissionem, quia ualde magna est, ideo desperemus, sed potius, quia ualde magnus eam promisit, accepturos nos esse credamus. sicut enim dicit beatus Iohannes apostolus, filii dei sumus et nondum apparuit, quid erimus: scimus. quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est.

### English translation (Claude)

In this love all our holy fathers, patriarchs, prophets and apostles pleased God; in this all the true martyrs contended against the devil even to blood, and because it did not grow cold or fail in them, they conquered; in this all good believers make progress daily, longing to reach not a kingdom of mortals but the kingdom of heaven, not a temporal but an eternal inheritance, not gold and silver but the incorruptible riches of the angels, not any goods of this world, in which one lives in fear and which no one can take with him when he dies, but the vision of God, whose sweetness and delight surpasses all the beauty not only of earthly but also of heavenly bodies, surpasses all the comeliness of souls however righteous and holy, surpasses all the splendour of the angels and powers above, surpasses whatever is not only said but even thought of him. And let us not despair of so great a promise because it is very great, but rather believe that we shall receive it because he who promised it is very great. For as the blessed apostle John says: 'We are children of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.'

### Scripture references

- Heb 12:4: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 John 3:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Heb 12:4; 1 John 3:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.3 (CSEL 57:132–133; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-3).

## Letter 189.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-4
- Source: CSEL 57:133–134
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Military service does not exclude pleasing God, as David, the centurion, Cornelius and the soldiers instructed by John the Baptist show.

### Latin text

Noli existimare neminem deo placere posse, qui in armis bellicis militat. in his erat sanctus Dauid, cui dominus tam magnum perhibuit testimonium, in his etiam plurimi illius temporis iusti. in his erat et ille centurio, qui domino dixit: Non sum dignus. ut intres sub tectum meum, sed tantum dic uerbo et sanabitur puer meus. nam et ego homo sum sub potestate constitutus habens sub me milites et dico huic: Vade et uadit, et alio: Veni et uenit, et seruo meo: Fac hoc et facit. de quo et dominus: Amen dico uobis; non inueni tantam fidem in Israhel. in his erat et ille Cornelius, ad quem missus angelus dixit: Corneli, acceptae sunt elemosynae tuae et exauditae sunt orationes tuae: ubi eum admonuit, ut ad beatum Petrum apostolum mitteret et ab illo audiret, quae facere deberet; ad quem apostolum, ut ad eum ueniret, etiam religiosum militem misit. in his erant et illi, qui baptizandi cum uenissent ad Iohannem, sanctum domini praecursorem et amicum sponsi. de quo ipse dominus ait: In natis mulierum non exsurrexit maior Iohanne Baptista, et quaesissent ab eo. quid facerent. respondit eis: Neminem concusseritis, nulli calumniam feceritis. sufficiat uobis stipendium uestrum. non eos utique sub armis militare prohibuit, quibus suum stipendium sufficere debere praecepit.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not think that no one who serves as a soldier under arms can please God. Among these was holy David, to whom the Lord gave such great testimony; among these also very many of the righteous of that time. Among these was also that centurion who said to the Lord: 'I am not worthy that you should come under my roof, but only say the word and my servant will be healed. For I too am a man placed under authority, with soldiers under me, and I say to this one, Go, and he goes, and to another, Come, and he comes, and to my servant, Do this, and he does it'; of whom the Lord also said, 'Amen, I say to you, I have not found such faith in Israel.' Among these was also that Cornelius, to whom an angel was sent and said, 'Cornelius, your alms have been accepted and your prayers heard'; where he told him to send to the blessed apostle Peter and hear from him what he ought to do; and to that apostle he sent a devout soldier too, to ask him to come to him. Among these were also those who, when they had come to be baptized by John, the holy forerunner of the Lord and friend of the Bridegroom, of whom the Lord himself said, 'Among those born of women there has not arisen one greater than John the Baptist', and asked him what they should do, he answered them: 'Do not extort from anyone, do not accuse anyone falsely; be content with your wages.' He certainly did not forbid those to serve under arms whom he told that their wages should be enough for them.

### Scripture references

- Matt 8:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:10: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:31: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:7: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:11: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 3:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 8:8–10; Acts 10:4–7, 31; John 3:29; Matt 11:11; Luke 3:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.4 (CSEL 57:133–134; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-4).

## Letter 189.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-5
- Source: CSEL 57:134–135
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Monks fight for soldiers by prayer and soldiers for monks by arms; in this world the good must live among the wicked until the proper time.

### Latin text

Maioris quidem loci sunt apud deum, qui omnibus istis saecularibus actionibus derelictis etiam summa continentia castitatis ei seruiunt. sed unusquisque. sicut dicit apostolus, proprium donum habet a deo alius sic alius autem sic. alii ergo pro uobis orando pugnant contra inuisibiles inimicos: uos pro eis pugnando laboratis contra uisibiles barbaros. utinam una fides esset in omnibus, quia et minus laboraretur et facilius diabolus cum suis angelis uinceretur! sed quia in hoc saeculo necesse est, ut ciues regni caelorum inter errantes et impios temptationibus agitentur. ut exerceantur et tamquam in fornace sicut aurum probentur, non debemus ante tempus uelle cum solis sanctis et iustis uiuere, ut hoc suo tempore mereamur accipere.

### English translation (Claude)

Those indeed hold a higher place with God who, having left all these worldly occupations, serve him also with the highest continence of chastity. But 'each', as the apostle says, 'has his own gift from God, one of one kind and another of another.' Some, then, fight for you by praying against invisible enemies; you labour for them by fighting against visible barbarians. Would that there were one faith in all, for then there would be less labour and the devil with his angels would be more easily conquered! But since in this world the citizens of the kingdom of heaven must be tossed by temptations among the erring and ungodly, so that they may be exercised and tested like gold in the furnace, we ought not to wish before the time to live with the holy and righteous alone, so that we may deserve to receive this in its own time.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 1:7: echo, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 3:6 (Wisdom of Solomon): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 7:7; Wis 3:6 (extrabiblical on this site) / 1 Pet 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.5 (CSEL 57:134–135; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-5).

## Letter 189.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-6
- Source: CSEL 57:135
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine counsels Boniface to keep faith even with enemies, to wage war only of necessity for the sake of peace, and to show mercy to the conquered.

### Latin text

Hoc ergo primum cogita, quando armaris ad pugnam, quia uirtus tua etiam ipsa corporalis donum dei est; sic enim cogitabis de dono dei non facere contra deum. fides enim quando promittitur, etiam hosti seruanda est, contra quem bellum geritur; quanto magis amico. pro quo pugnatur! pacem habere debet uoluntas, bellum necessitas, ut liberet deus a necessitate et conseruet in pace. non enim pax quaeritur, ut bellum excitetur, sed bellum geritur. ut pax adquiratur. esto ergo etiam bellando pacificus, ut eos, quos expugnas, ad pacis utilitatem uincendo perducas: beati enim pacifici, ait dominus. quoniam ipsi filii dei uocabuntur. si autem pax humana tam dulcis est pro temporali salute mortalium, quanto est dulcior pax diuina pro aeterna salute angelorum! itaque hostem pugnantem necessitas perimat, non uoluntas. sicut rebellanti et resistenti uiolentia redditur, ita uicto uel capto misericordia iam debetur. maxime in quo pacis perturbatio non timetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Think this first, then, when you arm yourself for battle: that your strength, even your bodily strength, is itself a gift of God; for so you will consider not to use God's gift against God. For when faith is pledged, it must be kept even with the enemy against whom war is waged; how much more with the friend for whom one fights! Peace should be the aim of the will, war only of necessity, so that God may free us from necessity and keep us in peace. For peace is not sought in order to stir up war, but war is waged in order to obtain peace. Be a peacemaker, then, even in waging war, so that by conquering you may bring those you defeat to the benefit of peace: 'For blessed are the peacemakers', says the Lord, 'for they shall be called children of God.' And if human peace is so sweet for the temporal well-being of mortals, how much sweeter is divine peace for the eternal well-being of angels! So let necessity, not will, slay the enemy who fights. As violence is returned to one who rebels and resists, so mercy is now owed to one conquered or captured, especially where there is no fear of a disturbance of peace.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:9. A classic statement of Augustine's view of war, translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.6 (CSEL 57:135; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-6).

## Letter 189.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-7
- Source: CSEL 57:135–137
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Boniface to conjugal chastity, sobriety and detachment from riches, to humility and prayer, and to ready forgiveness of others.

### Latin text

Ornet mores tuos pudicitia coniugalis, ornet sobrietas et frugalitas; ualde enim turpe est, ut, quem non uincit homo, uincat libido et obruatur uino, qui non uincitur ferro. diuitiae saeculares si desunt, non per mala opera quaerantur in mundo: si autem adsunt, per bona opera seruentur in caelo. animum uirilem et Christianum nec debent, si accedunt, extollere nec debent frangere, si recedunt. illud potius cogitemus, quod dominus ait: Ubi est thesaurus tuus, illic erit et cor tuum. et utique. cum audimus. ut cor sursum habeamus, non mendaciter respondere debemus. quod nosti quia respondemus. Et in his quidem bene studiosum te esse cognoui et fama tua multum delector multumque tibi in domino gratulor. ita ut haec epistula magis tibi sit speculum, ubi, qualis sis. uideas. quam ubi discas, qualis esse debeas. uerum tamen quicquid siue in ista siue in scripturis sanctis inueneris. quod tibi ad bonam uitam adhuc minus est, insta, ut adquiras, et agendo et orando et ex his, quae habes. gratias age deo tamquam fonti bonitatis, unde habes. atque in omnibus bonis actibus tuis illi da claritatem, tibi humilitatem. sicut enim scriptum est. omne datum optimum et omne donum perfectum desursum est descendens a patre luminum. quantumcumque autem in dei et proximi caritate atque in uera pietate profeceris, quam diu in hac uita conuersaris. sine peccato te esse non credas: de ipsa quippe legitur in litteris sanctis: Numquid non temptatio est uita humana super terram? proinde quoniam semper, quam diu es in hoc corpore, necessarium est tibi in oratione dicere. quod dominus docuit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. memento cito ignoscere, si quis in te peccauerit et a te ueniam postulauerit, ut ueraciter possis orare et peccatis tuis ueniam ualeas impetrare. haec dilectioni tuae festinanter quidem scripsi, quoniam me festinatio perlatoris urgebat. sed deo gratias ago. quoniam bono desiderio tuo qualitercumque non defui. semper te misericordia dei protegat. domine eximie et merito insignis atque honorabilis fili.

### English translation (Claude)

Let conjugal chastity adorn your character, let sobriety and frugality adorn it; for it is very shameful that one whom no man conquers should be conquered by lust, and that one who is not overcome by the sword should be overwhelmed by wine. If worldly riches are lacking, let them not be sought in the world by evil deeds; if they are present, let them be stored up in heaven by good deeds. They ought neither to puff up a manly and Christian spirit if they come, nor to break it if they go. Let us rather think of what the Lord says: 'Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.' And certainly, when we hear that we should lift up our hearts, we must not answer falsely what you know we answer. In these things I know you to be very zealous, and I greatly delight in your good report and greatly congratulate you in the Lord, so that this letter may be for you a mirror in which to see what you are rather than a place to learn what you ought to be. Nevertheless, whatever you find, whether in this letter or in the Holy Scriptures, that you still lack for a good life, press on to acquire it both by acting and by praying; and for what you have, give thanks to God as the fount of goodness from whom you have it; and in all your good actions give him the glory and yourself the humility. For as it is written, 'Every best gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights.' But however far you advance in the love of God and neighbour and in true piety, as long as you live in this life, do not believe that you are without sin; for of this life we read in the holy writings: 'Is not human life on earth a trial?' Therefore, since as long as you are in this body you must always say in prayer what the Lord taught, 'Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors', remember to forgive quickly if anyone sins against you and asks you for pardon, so that you may pray truthfully and be able to obtain pardon for your sins. I have written this to Your Affection in haste, since the haste of the bearer pressed me; but I thank God that I have not failed your good desire in some way. May the mercy of God always protect you, my excellent lord and deservedly distinguished and honourable son.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:21: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:20: allusion, medium confidence
- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Job 7:1: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 6:21; the liturgical 'Lift up your hearts'; Jas 1:17; Job 7:1; Matt 6:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 189.7 (CSEL 57:135–137; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/188-1/#p-189-7).

## Letter 190.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-1
- Source: CSEL 57:137–138
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Bishop Optatus, whose letter he read at Caesarea, on the question whether souls are propagated from Adam's soul or newly created for each person.

### Latin text

Quamuis tuae sanctitatis nullas ad me ipsum datas acceperim litteras, tamen, quia illae, quas ad Mauretaniam Caesariensem misisti, me apud Caesaream praesente uenerunt, quo nos iniuncta nobis a uenerabili papa Zosimo. apostolicae sedis episcopo, ecclesiastica necessitas traxerat, factum est. ut ea. quae scripsisti, etiam ipse perlegerem tradente mihi eandem epistulam tuam famulo dei sancto Renato, in Christo nobis fratre carissimo, quo petente et mihi licet aliis occupato uehementer instante ad ea sum respondere compulsus. accessit huc etiam alterius sancti et debito cum honore nominandi fratris nostri et, quantum ab illo comperi. necessarii tui Muresis, cum in supra dicto oppido remoraremur, aduentus. qui mihi rettulit etiam sibi missas de hac re litteras uenerationis tuae et me de hac ipsa quaestione consuluit, ut, quid inde sentirem, uel meis uel suis rescriptis ad te faceret peruenire. utrum scilicet animae ut corpora propagatione nascantur sintque ex illa una. quae primo homini creata est, an creator omnipotens, qui utique usque nunc operatur. sine ulla propagine nouas faciat singulis proprias.

### English translation (Claude)

Although I have received no letter from Your Holiness addressed to me personally, yet, since the letter you sent to Mauretania Caesariensis arrived while I was present at Caesarea, where church business laid on us by the venerable Pope Zosimus, bishop of the apostolic see, had brought us, it happened that I too read what you had written, when that letter of yours was handed to me by the holy servant of God Renatus, our very dear brother in Christ. At his request, and with his earnest urging, though I was busy with other things, I was compelled to answer it. There was added, while we were staying in that town, the arrival of another holy brother of ours, to be named with due honour, Muresis, and, as far as I learned from him, a close friend of yours. He told me that Your Reverence had sent a letter on this matter to him too, and consulted me on this very question, so that he might convey to you, either by my reply or his own, what I thought about it: namely, whether souls are born by propagation, like bodies, and come from that one soul which was created for the first man, or whether the almighty Creator, who certainly works until now, makes new ones, proper to each individual, without any propagation.

### Scripture references

- John 5:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 190, to Optatus, bishop in Mauretania (AD 418). Augustine was at Caesarea (Cherchel) on business for Pope Zosimus. John 5:17. The two views are 'traducianism' and 'creationism'.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.1 (CSEL 57:137–138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-1).

## Letter 190.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-2
- Source: CSEL 57:138–139
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine admits he has never reached a definite view on the origin of the soul and still hesitates between the two opinions.

### Latin text

De qua re antequam aliquid admoneam sinceritatem tuam, scire te uolo in tam multis opusculis meis numquam me fuisse ausum de hac quaestione definitam proferre sententiam et inpudenter referre in litteras ad alios informandos, quod apud me non fuerit explicatum. quarum autem rerum atque causarum consideratione permouear, ut in neutram assertionem mens inclinetur adsensus. sed adhuc inter utramque disceptem. nimis longum est hac epistula expromere nec tam necessarium. at hoc omisso non possit de hac quaestione, quod satis est. disputari etsi non ad auferendam cunctationem certe ad cauendam temeritatem.

### English translation (Claude)

Before I put anything before Your Sincerity on this matter, I want you to know that in my many little works I have never dared to put forward a definite opinion on this question, and shamelessly to commit to writing for the instruction of others what I had not worked out for myself. But by what considerations of facts and reasons I am moved so that my mind inclines to assent to neither assertion, but still hesitates between the two, would take too long to set out in this letter, and is not so necessary. But leaving this aside, this question can be discussed sufficiently, if not to remove hesitation, at least to avoid rashness.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.2 (CSEL 57:138–139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-2).

## Letter 190.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-3
- Source: CSEL 57:139–140
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever the soul's origin, one must hold firmly that all are born guilty in Adam and freed only by rebirth in Christ.

### Latin text

Illud enim. ubi uel maxime fides Christiana consistit. quod per hominem mors et per hominem resurrectio mortuorum: sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur. ita et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur: et quod per unum hominem peccatum in hunc mundum intrauit et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines mors pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt; et quod iudicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem; et quod Per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem et per unius iustificationem in omnes homines in iustificationem uitae et si qua alia testimonia declarant neminem nasci ex Adam nisi uinculo delicti et damnationis obstrictum neminemque inde liberari nisi renascendo per Christum, tam inconcusse tenere debemus. ut sciamus eum, qui hoc negauerit, nullo modo ad Christi fidem et ad eam. quae per Christum datur pusillis et magnis, dei gratiam pertinere. unde si origo animae lateat, dum tamen redemptio clareat, periculum non est; neque enim in Christum credimus, ut nascamur, sed ut renascamur. quomodocumque nati fuerimus.

### English translation (Claude)

For that in which the Christian faith chiefly consists, namely that 'through a man came death and through a man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive'; and that 'through one man sin entered this world, and through sin death, and so death passed to all men, in whom all sinned'; and that 'the judgment from one led to condemnation, but grace from many trespasses to justification'; and that 'through the trespass of one it came upon all men to condemnation, and through the justification of one upon all men to justification of life'; and any other testimonies that declare that no one is born of Adam except bound by the chain of guilt and condemnation, and no one is set free from it except by being reborn through Christ: this we must hold so unshakeably as to know that whoever denies it in no way belongs to the faith of Christ and to the grace of God that is given through Christ to small and great. Hence, if the origin of the soul is hidden, provided redemption is clear, there is no danger; for we do not believe in Christ in order to be born, but in order to be reborn, however we were born.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:21–22; Rom 5:12, 16, 18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.3 (CSEL 57:139–140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-3).

## Letter 190.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-4
- Source: CSEL 57:140–141
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The question may remain open only within limits: the soul is a creature, not part of God, not a body, and not sent into the body for sins in a previous life.

### Latin text

Hactenus autem dicimus sine periculo latere animae originem. ut non tamen eam partem dei esse credamus sed creaturam nec de deo natam sed ab illo factam atque in eius genus adoptandam mirabili dignatione gratiae, non parili dignitate naturae; nec eam corpus esse sed spiritum, non creatorem utique sed creaturam: nec ideo uenisse in hoc corpus corruptibile, quo grauatur, quod illuc eam uitae in caelestibus uel in quibuslibet aliis mundi partibus antea male gestae merita compulerunt; nondum enim natos apostolus. cum de Rebeccae geminis loqueretur, nihil egisse dicit boni uel mali, ut non ex operibus, quibus nullis alter distinguebatur ab altero, sed ex uocante diceretur minori seruiturum esse maiorem.

### English translation (Claude)

But we say that the origin of the soul is hidden without danger only so far as we do not believe it to be a part of God but a creature; not born of God but made by him, and to be adopted into his family by the wonderful condescension of grace, not by equal dignity of nature; nor a body but a spirit, certainly not creator but creature; nor that it came into this corruptible body, by which it is weighed down, because the deserts of a life previously lived badly in the heavens or in any other parts of the world drove it there. For the apostle, speaking of Rebecca's twins, says that, not yet born, they had done nothing good or evil, so that it was said, not from works (by which neither was distinguished from the other, for there were none) but from him who calls, that the elder would serve the younger.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:11: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 9:15 (extrabiblical on this site); Rom 9:11–12. The rejected view of pre-existent souls punished by embodiment is associated with Origen; Augustine does not name him.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.4 (CSEL 57:140–141; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-4).

## Letter 190.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-5
- Source: CSEL 57:141
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whether souls are new or propagated, the faith must stand that no one, adult or infant, is freed from original sin except through Christ the mediator.

### Latin text

His igitur firmissime constitutis si tam reconditum atque abditum est in occultis operibus dei. ut nec scripturarum diuinarum manifesto eloquio declaretur, utrum propterea nihil boni uel mali nondum nati egisse credendi sint, quia non ex aliis propagatas sed mox ex nihilo creatas animas singuli accipiunt, an quia, cum essent originaliter in parentibus. adhuc ipsi nulli erant. qui suas et proprias uitas agerent. illa tamen sit fides salua, qua credimus nullum hominum siue maioris siue paruulae quamlibet et recentis aetatis liberari a contagione mortis antiquae et obligatione peccati, quod prima natiuitate contraxit, nisi per unum mediatorem dei et hominum, hominem Christum Iesum.

### English translation (Claude)

With these points, then, most firmly established, if it is so hidden and concealed among the secret works of God that it is not declared by any clear statement of the divine Scriptures whether those not yet born are to be believed to have done nothing good or evil because each receives a soul not propagated from others but newly created from nothing, or because, while they were originally in their parents, they were not yet persons living their own proper lives; let that faith nevertheless remain safe by which we believe that no human being, whether of greater or of tender and however recent age, is set free from the contagion of the ancient death and from the bond of the sin contracted at the first birth, except through the one mediator between God and humanity, the man Christ Jesus.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.5 (CSEL 57:141; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-5).

## Letter 190.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-6
- Source: CSEL 57:141–142
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The righteous of the Old Testament were saved by the same faith in Christ as Christians, though their sacraments differed.

### Latin text

Cuius hominis eiusdemque dei saluberrima fide etiam illi iusti salui facti sunt, qui, priusquam ueniret in carne, crediderunt in carne uenturum. eadem namque fides est et nostra et illorum, quoniam hoc illi crediderunt futurum, quod nos credimus factum. unde dicit apostolus Paulus: Habentes autem eundem spiritum fidei, secundum quod scriptum est: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum. et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. si ergo eundem spiritum fidei et illi habebant, qui uenturum in carne Christum praenuntiarunt, quem etiam illi, qui eum uenisse nuntiarunt. sacramenta esse potuerunt pro temporum diuersitate diuersa, ad unitatem tamen eiusdem fidei concordissime recurrentia. scriptum est et in actibus apostolorum loquente apostolo Petro: Nunc ergo quid temptatis deum inponere iugum supra collum discipulorum, quod neque patres nostri neque nos potuimus portare? sed per gratiam domini Iesu credimus nos saluos fieri, quem ad modum et illi. si ergo et illi, id est patres portare iugum legis ueteris non ualentes per gratiam domini Iesu saluos se fieri crediderunt, manifestum est. quod haec gratia etiam antiquos iustos uiuere fecit ex fide; iustus enim ex fide uiuit.

### English translation (Claude)

By the most saving faith in this man, who is also God, even those righteous people were saved who, before he came in the flesh, believed that he would come in the flesh. For our faith and theirs is the same, since they believed would happen what we believe has happened. Hence the apostle Paul says: 'Having the same spirit of faith, according to what is written, I believed, therefore I spoke, we too believe, and therefore we speak.' If, then, those who foretold that Christ would come in the flesh had the same spirit of faith as those who announced that he had come, the sacraments could be different according to the difference of times, yet they all ran back most harmoniously to the unity of the same faith. It is written also in the Acts of the Apostles, the apostle Peter speaking: 'Now therefore why do you tempt God by putting on the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they are.' If, then, they too, that is, the fathers, unable to bear the yoke of the old law, believed that they were saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, it is clear that this grace made even the ancient righteous live by faith; for 'the righteous shall live by faith'.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:10 (115:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:10: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 15:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Hab 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 4:13 (Ps 116:10, 115:10 LXX/Vulg.); Acts 15:10–11; Hab 2:4 / Rom 1:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.6 (CSEL 57:141–142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-6).

## Letter 190.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-7
- Source: CSEL 57:142–143
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law was given not to justify but to convict proud humanity of sin, so that it might seek the medicine of grace.

### Latin text

Lex autem subintrauit. ut abundaret delictum. ut superabundaret gratia, per quam sanaretur delicti abundantia. si enim data esset lex, quae posset uiuificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia. cui tamen bono lex data sit, consequenter adiunxit dicens: Sed conclusit scriptura omnia sub peccato. ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus. danda itaque fuerat lex, quae manifestius sibi ipsum ostenderet hominem, ne superbus animus humanus a se ipso se posse esse iustum putaret et ignorans dei iustitiam, id est quae homini ex deo est. et suam uolens constituere. id est quasi suis sibi uiribus partam iustitiae dei subiectus non fieret. oportebat itaque. ut addito mandato, cuius uox est: Non concupisces, superbo peccatori etiam praeuaricationis crimen accederet atque ita gratiae medicinam non sanata per legem sed conuicta infirmitas quaereret.

### English translation (Claude)

'But the law came in so that the trespass might abound', so that grace might superabound, by which the abundance of the trespass might be healed. 'For if a law had been given that could give life, righteousness would indeed be from the law.' Yet for what good the law was given he went on to add, saying: 'But the Scripture has shut up all things under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.' So the law had to be given, to show man more plainly to himself, lest the proud human mind think it could be righteous by itself, and, not knowing the righteousness of God, that is, the righteousness which comes to man from God, and wishing to establish its own, that is, a righteousness as if gained for itself by its own powers, it should not submit to the righteousness of God. It was fitting, then, that by the addition of the commandment, whose voice is 'You shall not covet', the guilt of transgression should be added to the proud sinner, and so weakness, not healed by the law but convicted by it, might seek the medicine of grace.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:20; Gal 3:21–22; Rom 10:3; Rom 7:7 (Exod 20:17).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.7 (CSEL 57:142–143; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-7).

## Letter 190.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-8
- Source: CSEL 57:143–144
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: All the righteous, before and after the incarnation, live by faith in Christ, the only saving name since Adam's fall.

### Latin text

Proinde, cum omnes iusti, hoc est ueraces dei cultores siue ante incarnationem siue post incarnationem Christi nec uixerint nec uiuant nisi ex fide incarnationis Christi, in quo est gratiae plenitudo, profecto, quod scriptum est non esse aliud nomen sub caelo, in quo oportet saluos fieri nos, ex illo tempore ualet ad saluandum genus humanum, ex quo in Adam uitiatum est genus humanum. sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, ita et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur, quia, sicut in regno mortis nemo sine Adam, ita in regno uitae nemo sine Christo, sicut per Adam omnes homines, ita per Christum omnes iusti homines. sicut per Adam omnes mortales in poena facti sunt filii saeculi, ita et per Christum omnes inmortales in gratia filii dei.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, since all the righteous, that is, the true worshippers of God, whether before or after the incarnation of Christ, have not lived and do not live except by faith in the incarnation of Christ, in whom is the fullness of grace, certainly what is written, that there is no other name under heaven by which we must be saved, has had power to save the human race from the time when the human race was vitiated in Adam. 'For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive'; because, as in the kingdom of death no one is without Adam, so in the kingdom of life no one is without Christ; as through Adam all are human beings, so through Christ all are righteous human beings; as through Adam all, being mortal in punishment, have been made children of the world, so through Christ all, being immortal in grace, are made children of God.

### Scripture references

- John 1:14: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 4:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:14; Acts 4:12; 1 Cor 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.8 (CSEL 57:143–144; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-8).

## Letter 190.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-9
- Source: CSEL 57:144–145
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God creates even those destined to damnation because the whole lump from Adam is condemned; birth makes vessels of wrath by just punishment, rebirth vessels of mercy by grace.

### Latin text

Cur autem creentur etiam illi, quos creator nouit ad damnationem non ad gratiam pertinere, beatus apostolus tanto succinctiore breuitate quanto maiore auctoritate commemorat. deum enim dicit uolentem ostendere iram et demonstrare potentiam suam adtulisse in multa patientia uasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem. et ut notas faceret diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae, quem superius dixerat tamquam figulum luti ex eadem massa facere aliud uas in honorem aliud in contumeliam. merito autem uideretur iniustum, quod fiunt inde uasa irae ad perditionem, si non esset ipsa uniuersa ex Adam massa damnata. quod ergo fiunt inde nascendo uasa irae, pertinet ad debitam poenam: quod autem fiunt renascendo uasa misericordiae, pertinet ad indebitam gratiam.

### English translation (Claude)

But why those too are created whom the Creator knew would belong to damnation and not to grace, the blessed apostle mentions with a brevity as concise as his authority is great. For he says that God, 'wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction, and that he might make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy'; he whom he had described earlier as a potter who makes from the same lump of clay one vessel for honour and another for dishonour. It would rightly seem unjust that vessels of wrath for destruction are made from it, if that whole lump from Adam were not itself condemned. That they become vessels of wrath by being born, then, belongs to deserved punishment; that they become vessels of mercy by being reborn belongs to undeserved grace.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:21–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.9 (CSEL 57:144–145; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-9).

## Letter 190.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-10
- Source: CSEL 57:145
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's wrath is just retribution on humanity born of disobedience; his power uses even the wicked to teach the elect that grace alone distinguishes them, as is clearest with infants.

### Latin text

Ostendit ergo deus iram suam. non utique animi perturbationem, sicut est, quae ira hominis nuncupatur, sed iustam fixamque uindictam. quod de stirpe inoboedientiae ducitur propago peccati atque supplicii. et homo natus ex muliere. sicut in libro Iob scriptum est breuis est uitae et plenus iracundiae. eius enim rei uas est, qua plenus est; unde irae uasa dicuntur. ostendit et potentiam suam, qua bene utitur etiam malis multa illis naturalia et temporalia bona largiens eorumque malitiam ad exercendos et comparatione admonendos bonos accommodans, ut in eis discant agere gratias deo. quod ab eis non suis meritis, quae in eadem massa paria fuerunt, sed illius miseratione discreti sunt. quod maxime apparet in paruulis, de quibus, cum per Christi gratiam renascuntur et istam uitam in illa tenera aetate finientes in aeternam transeunt et beatam, dici non potest, quod libero discernuntur arbitrio ab aliis infantibus, qui sine hac gratia in ipsius massae damnatione moriuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

God shows his wrath, then, certainly not as a disturbance of mind, like what is called human anger, but as just and fixed retribution, in that from the stock of disobedience is drawn the offspring of sin and punishment. And 'man born of woman', as it is written in the book of Job, 'is short of life and full of wrath'. For he is the vessel of that of which he is full; hence they are called vessels of wrath. He shows also his power, which he uses well even with the evil, bestowing on them many natural and temporal goods and adapting their malice to exercise the good and to warn them by comparison, so that in them the good may learn to give thanks to God that they have been distinguished from them not by their own merits, which were equal in the same lump, but by his mercy. This appears most clearly in little children, of whom, when they are reborn through Christ's grace and, ending this life at that tender age, pass into eternal and blessed life, it cannot be said that they are distinguished by free choice from other infants who die without this grace in the condemnation of that same lump.

### Scripture references

- Job 14:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Job 14:1 (in the Old Latin, 'full of wrath').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.10 (CSEL 57:145; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-10).

## Letter 190.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-11
- Source: CSEL 57:145–146
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If only the elect were born, grace would not be recognized as grace; the condemnation of others shows the saved what they have been given.

### Latin text

Si autem hi soli crearentur ex Adam. qui essent per gratiam recreandi. et praeter illos, qui in dei filios adoptantur, nulli alii homines nascerentur. lateret beneficium. quod donaretur indignis, quia nullis ex eadem damnabili stirpe uenientibus debitum supplicium redderetur. cum uero adtulit in multa patientia uasa irae. quae perfecta sunt in perditionem, non solum ostendit iram et demonstrauit potentiam suam redhibendo uindictam et bene utendo non bonis, sed etiam notas fecit diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae. ita enim, quid sibi praestetur. discit gratis iustificatus, dum non suo merito sed gloria largissimae dei misericordiae discernitur a damnato, cum quo eadem iustitia, fuerat et ipse damnandus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if only those were created from Adam who were to be re-created by grace, and no other human beings were born besides those who are adopted as children of God, the benefit given to the unworthy would be hidden, because no deserved punishment would be paid to any coming from that same damnable stock. But since he endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction, he not only showed his wrath and made known his power by rendering retribution and making good use of what is not good, but also made known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy. For so the one justified freely learns what is granted to him, when he is distinguished from the condemned, not by his own merit but by the glory of God's most generous mercy, with whom by the same justice he too would have been condemned.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:22–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.11 (CSEL 57:145–146; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-11).

## Letter 190.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-12
- Source: CSEL 57:146–147
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God allows the condemned to outnumber the elect, showing both the justice owed to the whole lump and the mercy by which he makes some vessels for honour.

### Latin text

Tam multos autem creando nasci uoluit, quos ad suam gratiam non pertinere praesciuit. ut multitudine incomparabili plures sint eis, quos in sui regni gloriam filios promissionis praedestinare dignatus est, ut etiam ipsa reiectorum multitudine ostenderetur, quam nullius momenti sit apud deum iustum quantalibet numerositas iustissime damnatorum. atque ut hinc quoque intellegant, qui ex ipsa damnatione redimuntur. hoc fuisse debitum massae illi uniuersae, quod tam magnae parti eius redditum cernerent non solum in eis. qui originali peccato multa addunt malae uoluntatis arbitrio. uerum etiam in tam multis paruulis, qui tantum modo uinculo peccati originalis obstricti sine gratia mediatoris ex hac luce rapiuntur. tota quippe ista massa iustae damnationis reciperet debitum. nisi ex ea faceret non solum iustus sed etiam misericors figulus alia uasa in honorem secundum gratiam non secundum debitum, dum et paruulis subuenit. quorum nulla merita dici possunt, et maiores praeuenit. ut habere aliqua merita possint.

### English translation (Claude)

And he willed that so many be born by creating them, whom he foreknew would not belong to his grace, that they are incomparably more numerous than those whom he deigned to predestine as children of the promise to the glory of his kingdom, so that by the very multitude of the rejected it might be shown how little any number, however great, of those most justly condemned counts with a just God. And so that from this too those who are redeemed from that condemnation might understand that this was owed to that whole lump which they saw paid to so great a part of it, not only in those who add many sins to original sin by the choice of an evil will, but also in so many little children who, bound only by the chain of original sin, are snatched from this light without the grace of the mediator. For that whole lump would receive the debt of just condemnation, unless the potter, not only just but also merciful, made from it other vessels for honour according to grace and not according to debt, both coming to the aid of little children, of whom no merits can be spoken, and going before adults, so that they may be able to have some merits.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:8, 21. Augustine's view of the number of the condemned and of infants dying unbaptized is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.12 (CSEL 57:146–147; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-12).

## Letter 190.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-13
- Source: CSEL 57:147–148
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If Optatus holds that new souls are created for each person, he must explain how they incur original condemnation without making God the author of sin or of injustice.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, si assertio tua non eo tendit, ut nouas animas dicas propter innocentiam nouitatis suae, antequam ad peccandum libero utantur arbitrio. damnationi originali obnoxias esse non posse. sed eas fide catholica confiteris, etiam si in illa tenera aetate de corpore exierint, in damnationem perditionis ituras, nisi sacramento mediatoris, qui uenit quaerere et saluum facere, quod perierat, liberentur. quaere, ubi uel unde uel quando coeperint damnationis meritum habere, si nouae sunt, ita sane, ut deum non facias nec aliquam naturam. quam non condidit deus, uel peccati earum uel innocentum damnationis auctorem. et si inueneris, quod te quaerere admonui, quod ipse adhuc, fateor, non inueni. defende, quantum potes, atque adsere animarum infantium eius modi esse nouitatem, ut nulla propagatione ducantur. et nobiscum, quod inueneris, fraterna dilectione communica.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, if your assertion does not tend to say that new souls, because of the innocence of their newness, cannot be liable to original condemnation before they use free choice to sin, but you confess with the Catholic faith that, even if they leave the body at that tender age, they will go into the condemnation of perdition unless they are set free by the sacrament of the mediator, who came to seek and to save what was lost, then seek where, from what source, or when they began to have the desert of condemnation, if they are new; but in such a way, certainly, that you make neither God nor any nature not created by God the author either of their sin or of the condemnation of the innocent. And if you find what I have urged you to seek, which I confess I have not yet found myself, defend as well as you can, and assert, that the newness of infants' souls is such that they are not derived by any propagation; and share with us, in brotherly love, what you find.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 19:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.13 (CSEL 57:147–148; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-13).

## Letter 190.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-14
- Source: CSEL 57:148–149
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If creationism cannot explain original sin, one should not rashly adopt traducianism, especially Tertullian's materialist version.

### Latin text

Si autem non inueneris, qua re uel quo modo fiant animae infantium peccatrices et nihil in se ipsis habentes malitiae a quo cogantur ex Adam trahere, unde damnentur, cum eas credas non ex illa prima peccatrice propagatas sed nouas atque insontes includi carne peccati, nec sic iam temere in aliam sententiam tua deflectatur assensio, ut eas ex illa una credas propagando traduci, ne forte alius inuenire possit. quod ipse non possis, aut aliquando inuenias, quod nunc non potueris. nam et illi. qui animas ex una propagari adserunt, quam deus homini primo dedit, atque ita eas ex parentibus trahi dicunt, si Tertulliani opinionem sequuntur, profecto eas non spiritus sed corpora esse contendunt et corpulentis seminibus exoriri. quo peruersius quid dici potest? neque hoc Tertullianum somniasse mirandum est. qui etiam ipsum creatorem deum non esse nisi corpus opinatur.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you do not find why or how the souls of infants become sinful, and, having no malice in themselves, by what they are forced to draw from Adam that for which they are condemned, since you believe them not propagated from that first sinful soul but enclosed, new and guiltless, in the flesh of sin, do not even so let your assent turn rashly to the other opinion, so as to believe that they are derived by propagation from that one soul; lest perhaps another may be able to find what you cannot, or you may one day find what you could not now. For those too who assert that souls are propagated from the one soul which God gave to the first man, and so say that they are derived from the parents, if they follow the opinion of Tertullian, certainly maintain that they are not spirits but bodies and arise from bodily seeds. What more perverse thing could be said? Nor is it surprising that Tertullian dreamed this, since he thought that even God the Creator himself is nothing but body.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tertullian, An. (On the Soul): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Tertullian, On the Soul (e.g. 5–9, 27) and Against Praxeas 7 (God as body).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.14 (CSEL 57:148–149; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-14).

## Letter 190.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-15
- Source: CSEL 57:149–150
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even a spiritual traducianism, which preserves original sin, faces insoluble questions about how a soul could be transmitted from parent to child.

### Latin text

Qua dementia repulsa a corde atque ore Christiano quisquis animam. sicuti est, non esse corpus sed spiritum confitetur et tamen in filios ex parentibus duci, in eo quidem nullis coartatur angustiis, quod omnes animas etiam paruulorum, quos ecclesia non utique in falsa sed in uera peccatorum remissione baptizat, uera fides praedicat trahere originale peccatum propria primi hominis uoluntate commissum et in omnes posteros generatione transmissum sola regeneratione purgandum; sed cum considerari et pertractari coeperit. quid dicatur. mirum, si ullus sensus comprehendit humanus. quonam modo. tamquam lucerna de lucerna accendatur et sine detrimento alterius alter inde ignis existat. sic anima de anima parentis fiat in prole uel traducatur in prolem. utrum incorporeum semen animae sua quadam occulta et inuisibili uia seorsum ex patre currat in matrem, cum fit conceptus in femina. an. quod est incredibilius, in semine corporis lateat: cum autem fluunt inrita sine ullis conceptibus semina. utrum semen animae non simul exeat, an summa celeritate atque atomo temporis, unde exierat, recurrat, an pereat; et si perit, quo modo ipsa, cuius mortale semen est, inmortalis est anima, an inmortalitatem tunc accipit, quando formatur, ut uiuat, sicut iustitiam, quando formatur, ut sapiat; et quo pacto deus eam fingat in homine, etiamsi anima seminaliter trahatur ex anima, sicut fingit in homine corporis membra, quamuis corpus seminaliter trahatur ex corpore. si enim non etiam spiritalis creatura fingeretur a deo, non scriptum esset: Qui fingit spiritum hominis in ipso; et in eo, quod legitur: Qui finxit singillatim corda hominum, si per corda significatae sunt animae. fingi eas posse quis dubitet? sed quaeritur, utrum ex una anima hominis primi, sicut fingit singillatim facies hominum ex uno tamen corpore hominis primi.

### English translation (Claude)

When this madness has been driven from Christian heart and lips, whoever confesses that the soul, as it is, is not body but spirit, and yet is derived from parents into children, is indeed under no constraint in this respect: that the true faith proclaims that all souls, even those of little children, whom the Church baptizes not for a false but for a true remission of sins, draw original sin, committed by the first man's own will and transmitted to all his descendants by generation, to be cleansed only by regeneration. But when one begins to consider and examine what is being said, it would be a wonder if any human sense could grasp in what way, as a lamp is lit from a lamp and another flame arises from it without loss to the first, so a soul comes into being in the offspring from the soul of the parent, or is derived into the offspring; whether the incorporeal seed of the soul runs separately by some hidden and invisible way of its own from the father into the mother when conception takes place in a woman, or, what is still harder to believe, lies hidden in the bodily seed; and when the seeds flow uselessly without any conception, whether the seed of the soul does not go out with them, or returns with the greatest speed and in an instant of time to where it came from, or perishes; and if it perishes, how the soul itself, whose seed is mortal, is immortal; or whether it receives immortality when it is formed so as to live, just as it receives righteousness when it is formed so as to be wise; and in what way God fashions it in a human being, even if the soul is derived seminally from a soul, as he fashions the members of the body in a human being, though the body is derived seminally from a body. For if the spiritual creature too were not fashioned by God, it would not be written, 'Who fashions the spirit of man within him'; and from the passage that reads, 'Who fashioned the hearts of men one by one', if souls are signified by 'hearts', who would doubt that they can be fashioned? But the question is whether it is from the one soul of the first man, as he fashions the faces of men one by one, yet from the one body of the first man.

### Scripture references

- Zech 12:1: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 33:15 (32:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Zech 12:1; Ps 33:15 (32:15). The comparison 'righteousness … wise' follows the digital text ('iustitiam … sapiat'); the sense is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.15 (CSEL 57:149–150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-15).

## Letter 190.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-16
- Source: CSEL 57:150–152
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is certainly the creator of every soul, but whether he makes souls from Adam's or from nothing is not clearly revealed and should not be defined by conjecture.

### Latin text

Cum haec atque huius modi de hac re multa quaeruntur. quae nullo sensu carnis explorari possunt et a nostra experientia longe remota sunt atque in abditissimis naturae sinibus latent, non erubescendum est homini confiteri se nescire. quod nescit, ne, dum se scire mentitur. numquam scire mereatur. quis autem negat non unius tantum sed omnis animae creatorem deum atque factorem, nisi qui eius eloquiis apertissime refragatur? sine ulla quippe ambiguitate per prophetam dicit: Omnem flatum ego feci animas uidelicet intellegi uolens. quod uerba consequentia manifestant. non itaque unum, quem facto ex terra homini primo inspirauit, sed omnem flatum ipse fecit, ipse adhuc facit. quaeritur tamen, utrum omnem flatum ex illo uno flatu sicut omne corpus hominis ex illo uno corpore faciat, an uero noua quidem corpora faciat ex uno animas autem nouas ex nihilo. quis enim congrua suis originibus genera rerum etiam de seminibus facit: nisi qui ipsa semina sine seminibus fecit? sed ubi res naturaliter obscura nostrum modulum uincit et aperta diuina scriptura non subuenit, temere hinc aliquid definire humana coniectura praesumit. secundum uitas autem, quas proprias habere incipiunt, nouos homines dicimus nasci siue anima siue corpore; at uero secundum originale peccatum ueteres nascuntur, ideo baptismate renouantur.

### English translation (Claude)

When these and many other such questions are asked on this matter, which cannot be explored by any sense of the flesh, are far removed from our experience, and lie hidden in the most secret recesses of nature, a man should not blush to confess that he does not know what he does not know, lest, by lying that he knows, he never deserve to know. And who denies that God is the creator and maker not of one soul only but of every soul, except one who most openly opposes his words? For without any ambiguity he says through the prophet, 'I have made every breath', clearly wishing souls to be understood, as the following words show. So he made not only the one breath that he breathed into the first man made from the earth, but every breath; he made it, and he still makes it. Yet the question is whether he makes every breath from that one breath, as every human body from that one body, or whether he makes new bodies from the one, but new souls from nothing. For who makes the kinds of things suited to their origins even from seeds, but he who made the seeds themselves without seeds? But where a matter naturally obscure exceeds our measure, and the divine Scripture does not clearly help, human conjecture is presumptuous to define anything about it. According to the lives they begin to have as their own, we say that new human beings are born, whether in soul or in body; but according to original sin they are born old, and therefore are renewed by baptism.

### Scripture references

- Isa 57:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 57:16 (in the Latin version 'I have made every breath'); Gen 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.16 (CSEL 57:150–152; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-16).

## Letter 190.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-17
- Source: CSEL 57:152–153
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The proof-texts offered for the creation of new souls, including Eccl 12:7, can all be answered by the traducianists, so Scripture leaves the question open.

### Latin text

Aliquid ergo certum de animae origine nondum in scripturis canonicis comperi. nam hi, qui nouas sine ulla propagine adserunt animas fieri, inter testimonia, quibus id nituntur ostendere, ponunt etiam illa duo, quae paulo ante commemoraui: Qui fingit spiritum hominis in ipso. et: Qui finxit singillatim corda hominum, de quibus uides, quem ad modum possit a resistentibus responderi: utrum enim. cum fingit, ex alio fingat an ex nihilo. incertum est. illud tamen inter cetera testimonium uidetur esse praecipuum, quod in libro Salomonis Ecclesiaste legitur: Et reuertetur puluis in terram, sicut erat, et spiritus reuertetur ad deum, qui dedit eum. sed facillime respondetur: Corpus in terram, de qua factum est primum hominis corpus. et spiritus ad deum, a quo facta est prima hominis anima; sicut enim nostrum corpus, inquiunt, quamuis ex primo illo corpore propagatum sit, eo tamen redit. unde ipsum primum corpus effectum est. sic anima nostra quamuis ex illa anima propagata non ad nihilum, quia inmortalis est, sed ad illum redit. a quo ipsa prima anima facta est. ac per hoc illud, quod scriptum est de spiritu cuiusque hominis, quod redeat ad deum, qui dedit eum, non soluit istam obscurissimam quaestionem, quia siue ex illo uno siue ex nullo alio deus utique dedit eum.

### English translation (Claude)

So I have not yet found anything certain about the origin of the soul in the canonical Scriptures. For those who assert that new souls are made without any propagation also include among the testimonies by which they try to show it those two that I mentioned a little earlier: 'Who fashions the spirit of man within him', and, 'Who fashioned the hearts of men one by one'; and you see how their opponents can answer them, for whether, when he fashions, he fashions from another or from nothing is uncertain. Yet the chief testimony among the rest seems to be what we read in Solomon's book Ecclesiastes: 'And the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it.' But the answer is very easy: the body to the earth, from which the first human body was made, and the spirit to God, by whom the first human soul was made. For just as our body, they say, though propagated from that first body, nevertheless returns to that from which the first body itself was made, so our soul, though propagated from that soul, returns not to nothing, since it is immortal, but to him by whom the first soul itself was made. And so what is written of the spirit of each person, that it returns to God who gave it, does not solve this most obscure question, since whether from that one or from no other, God certainly gave it.

### Scripture references

- Zech 12:1: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 33:15 (32:15 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 12:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Zech 12:1; Ps 33:15 (32:15); Eccl 12:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.17 (CSEL 57:152–153; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-17).

## Letter 190.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-18
- Source: CSEL 57:153–154
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Traducianists cite Gen 46:26, 'souls … who came out of Jacob's thighs', and read Gen 2:23 as part for whole.

### Latin text

Itemque illi, qui propaginem animarum inconsiderata temeritate defendunt, inter alia testimonia, quae suae causae suffragari arbitrantur. nullum quasi manifestius et expressius pro se possunt putare proferendum quam id, quod in Genesi scriptum est: Omnes autem animae, quae introierunt cum Iacob in Aegyptum, qui exierunt de femoribus eius. hoc enim uelut euidentissimo testimonio possunt credi animae in filios ex parentibus propagari, quoniam satis aperte dictum uidetur animas etiam de femoribus Iacob non sola exisse corpora filiorum, ut eo modo etiam illud intellegi uelint a parte totum, quod dixit Adam. cum illi mulier eius ostenderetur: Hoc nunc os ex ossibus meis et caro de carne mea; non enim dixit et anima de anima mea, sed ita fieri potest, ut carne nominata utrumque intellegatur, sicut hic animas nominauit et tamen etiam corpora in filiis intellegi uoluit.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise those who defend the propagation of souls with thoughtless rashness can think of no testimony to bring forward, among others that they think support their cause, more plain and explicit than what is written in Genesis: 'All the souls that went into Egypt with Jacob, who came out of his thighs.' For by this seemingly most evident testimony souls can be believed to be propagated from parents into children, since it seems to be said quite plainly that souls too, not only the bodies of the sons, came out of Jacob's thighs; so that in this way they would wish also to understand as the whole from a part what Adam said when his wife was shown to him, 'This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh'. For he did not say 'and soul of my soul'; but it may be that by naming the flesh both are to be understood, just as here he named souls and yet wished bodies also to be understood in the sons.

### Scripture references

- Gen 46:26: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 46:26; Gen 2:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.18 (CSEL 57:153–154; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-18).

## Letter 190.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-19
- Source: CSEL 57:154–155
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Gen 46:26 does not prove traducianism, since 'soul' can stand for the body by metonymy and the masculine 'who came out' refers to the persons.

### Latin text

Sed hoc testimonium certe quasi tam clarum atque manifestum enodandae huic quaestioni non sufficeret, nec si ita legeretur genere feminino quae exierunt de femoribus eius ut animas intellegeremus, quae exierunt. ideo autem non sufficeret, quoniam et animae nomine corpus solum posse significari modo quodam locutionis ostenditur. quo significatur per id, quod continetur, illud, quod continet, sicut ait quidam: Vina coronant, cum coronarentur uasa uinum: uinum enim continetur, uas continet. sicut ergo appellamus ecclesiam basilicam, qua continetur populus, qui uere appellatur ecclesia, ut nomine ecclesiae, id est populi. qui continetur, significemus locum, qui continet, ita, quod animae corporibus continentur. intellegi corpora filiorum per nominatas animas possunt. sic enim melius accipitur etiam illud. quod lex inquinari dicit eum. qui intrauerit super animam mortuam. hoc est super defuncti cadauer. ut nomine animae mortuae mortuum corpus intellegatur. quod animam continebat, quia et absente populo. id est ecclesia locus tamen ille nihilo minus ecclesia nuncupatur. haec responderentur, sicut dixi, si feminino genere positum esset quae exierunt de femoribus Iacob, id est quae animae. nunc uero cum masculinum genus sit positum. id est qui exierunt de femoribus Iacob, quis non ita intellegere malit: omnes animae eorum, qui exierunt ex femoribus eius, id est animae hominum, ut etiam sic possint intellegi secundum corpus tantum modo exisse homines de femoribus patris, quorum erant illae animae, per quarum numerum intelleguntur tot homines?

### English translation (Claude)

But this testimony, as if so clear and plain, would certainly not suffice to untie this question, not even if it read with the feminine gender, 'which came out of his thighs', so that we would understand the souls as what came out. It would not suffice, because it is shown that by the name of soul the body alone can be signified, by a certain figure of speech by which the container is signified through what is contained, as one poet says, 'They crown the wines', when the vessels of wine were crowned: the wine is contained, the vessel contains. So, just as we call 'church' the basilica in which the people is contained who is truly called the Church, so that by the name of church, that is, of the people contained, we signify the place that contains them, so, because souls are contained in bodies, the bodies of the sons can be understood by naming their souls. In this way also is better taken what the law says, that whoever has gone in upon a dead soul, that is, upon the corpse of a deceased person, is defiled, so that by the name 'dead soul' the dead body is understood which contained the soul; just as, even when the people, that is, the Church, is absent, that place is nonetheless called a church. These answers would be given, as I said, if it were put in the feminine gender, 'which came out of Jacob's thighs', that is, which souls. But now, since the masculine gender has been put, that is, 'who came out of Jacob's thighs', who would not rather understand it thus: all the souls of those who came out of his thighs, that is, the souls of the persons, so that even so it can be understood that the persons, whose souls those were, came out of their father's thighs only according to the body, and by the number of the souls so many persons are understood?

### Scripture references

- Num 6:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Lev 21:11: allusion, medium confidence
- Gen 46:26: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 1.724 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Virgil, Aeneid 1.724 and 7.147 ('vina coronant'); Num 6:6 / Lev 21:11 ('dead soul'); Gen 46:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.19 (CSEL 57:154–155; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-19).

## Letter 190.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-20
- Source: CSEL 57:155–156
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how a friend consulted Jerome, who favoured the creation of souls, and how Augustine wrote Jerome a book asking to be taught.

### Latin text

Vellem autem legere libellum tuum. cuius mentionem fecisti in litteris tuis, ne forte aliqua ibi testimonia non ambigua posuisti. a me autem cum quaesisset amicus mihi carissimus et diuinarum studiosissimus litterarum, quid de hac quaestione sentirem. eique remota uerecundia hinc aestus meos et ignorantiam fassus essem. scripsit inde longe trans mare ad doctissimum uirum. cui rescripsit ille. ut potius me consuleret, nesciens, quod iam fecerat nec aliquid a me certum ac definitum audire potuerat. significauit tamen in eadem breui epistula sua se potius fieri quam propagari animas credere simul etiam admonens animarum propaginem — quia ipse in oriente est — occidentalem ecclesiam solere sentire. hac ego maiore occasione comperta scripsi ad eum non breuem librum consulens eum et petens, ut prius me doceat et tunc ad me mittat, quos doceam.

### English translation (Claude)

I should like to read your little book, which you mentioned in your letter, in case perhaps you have put some unambiguous testimonies there. When a friend very dear to me, and very devoted to the study of the divine writings, asked me what I thought about this question, and I, setting aside embarrassment, confessed to him my uncertainty and ignorance in the matter, he wrote about it far across the sea to a most learned man. He wrote back that he should rather consult me, not knowing that he had already done so and could hear nothing certain and definite from me. Yet in that same short letter he indicated that he believed souls are made rather than propagated, at the same time noting that the Western Church usually holds the propagation of souls, for he himself is in the East. Having learned of this, and with this greater opportunity, I wrote to him a book of some length, consulting him and asking him first to teach me and then to send me those whom I might teach.

### Translation notes

- The friend is Marcellinus; the 'most learned man' is Jerome (Jerome, Ep. 126 = Augustine, Ep. 165); Augustine's book is Ep. 166.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.20 (CSEL 57:155–156; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-20).

## Letter 190.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-21
- Source: CSEL 57:156–157
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine keeps his book to Jerome private until he receives an answer showing how new souls could incur original sin without God being its author.

### Latin text

Qui liber meus non doctoris sed inquisitoris et potius discere cupientis apud me legi potest; mitti uero uspiam non debet uel cuiquam foras dari, nisi cum rescripta domino adiuuante percepero id, quod ille sentit, promptissime ac libentissime defensurus, si me docere potuerit, quo modo animae neque ex Adam ueniant et tamen ex illo iustam sortem damnationis inueniant, nisi ad remissionem peccatorum renascendo perueniant. absit enim, ut credamus uel animas paruulorum in lauacro regenerationis falsam accipere peccatorum mundationem uel deum esse aut aliquam naturam, quam non deus condidit. illius. ex qua mundantur, inquinationis auctorem. donec ergo aut ille rescribat aut ego, si deus uoluerit, aliquo modo discam, si nullam de illa peccatrice originem ducit, quae causa sit animae subeundi originale peccatum, quod necesse est esse in omnibus paruulis et quo eam nec deus cogit insontem, quia peccandi auctor non est, nec ulla mali natura. quia non est. nihil tale audeo praedicare.

### English translation (Claude)

That book of mine, written not as a teacher but as an enquirer, and rather as one eager to learn, can be read at my house; but it should not be sent anywhere or given to anyone outside until, with the Lord's help, I have received his reply, ready to defend most promptly and willingly what he holds, if he can teach me how souls neither come from Adam and yet incur from him the just lot of condemnation, unless they attain by rebirth to the forgiveness of sins. For far be it that we should believe either that the souls of little children receive a false cleansing of sins in the washing of regeneration, or that God, or any nature not created by God, is the author of the defilement from which they are cleansed. Until, then, either he replies or I, if God wills, learn in some way, if the soul draws no origin from that sinful soul, what is the cause of its incurring original sin, which must be in all little children, and into which neither God forces it while innocent, since he is not the author of sin, nor any nature of evil, since there is none, I dare proclaim nothing of the kind.

### Translation notes

- Augustine, Ep. 166.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.21 (CSEL 57:156–157; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-21).

## Letter 190.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-22
- Source: CSEL 57:157–158
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Optatus against the Pelagian heresy condemned by Innocent and Zosimus, which uses the creation of new souls to deny original sin, quoting Pelagius's argument.

### Latin text

Te autem. si libenter uel patienter admittis, carissime frater, admoneo, ne haeresem nouam minus cautus incurras. quae antiquissimae fidei stabilita molitur fundamenta conuellere aduersus dei gratiam disputando, quam dominus Christus pusillis et magnis ineffabili bonitate largitur. cuius uel auctores uel certe acerrimi notissimique suasores cum Pelagius et Caelestius extitissent, conciliorum episcopalium uigilantia in adiutorio saluatoris. qui suam tuetur ecclesiam, etiam a duobus uenerabilibus antistitibus apostolicae sedis, papa Innocentio et papa Zosimo, nisi correcti etiam egerint paenitentiam, toto Christiano orbe damnati sunt, de quibus exempla recentium litterarum. siue quae specialiter ad Afros siue quae uniuersaliter ad omnes episcopos de memorata sede manarunt, ne forte ad uestram sanctitatem nondum peruenerint, uobis curauimus mitti ab eis fratribus, quibus et has litteras, ut tuae uenerationi dirigerent. dedimus. hi autem non ideo sunt haeretici. quia dicunt animas originem de illa prima peccatrice non ducere. quod uel aliqua fortasse ratione uera dici potest uel sine fidei labe nesciri, sed hinc conantur efficere, unde omnino apertissimi haeretici iudicantur. animas paruulorum nihil mali ex Adam trahere, quod sit lauacro regenerationis expiandum. nam Pelagii de hac re argumentatio. quae inter alia eius damnabilia etiam litteris apostolicae sedis adiuncta est, ita se habet: Si anima, inquit, ex traduce non est, sed sola caro tantum habet traducem peccati, sola ergo poenam meretur. iniustum est enim. ut hodie nata anima non ex massa Adae tam antiquum peccatum portet alienum, quia nulla ratione conceditur, ut deus, qui propria peccata dimittit, unum inputet alienum.

### English translation (Claude)

But you, dearest brother, if you accept it willingly or patiently, I warn not to fall incautiously into the new heresy which is striving to tear up the established foundations of the most ancient faith by arguing against the grace of God, which the Lord Christ in his ineffable goodness bestows on small and great. Since Pelagius and Caelestius emerged as either its authors or at least its sharpest and best-known advocates, they have been condemned throughout the Christian world, unless, corrected, they also do penance, by the vigilance of episcopal councils, with the help of the Saviour who protects his Church, and also by two venerable bishops of the apostolic see, Pope Innocent and Pope Zosimus. Copies of the recent letters about them that have come from that see, whether those addressed specially to the Africans or those addressed generally to all bishops, we have taken care to have sent to you, in case they have not yet reached Your Holiness, by the brothers to whom we also gave this letter to deliver to Your Reverence. These men are not heretics because they say that souls do not draw their origin from that first sinful soul, which perhaps can be truly said for some reason, or can be unknown without damage to faith; but they try to prove from it the thing for which they are judged utterly plain heretics: that the souls of little children draw nothing evil from Adam to be expiated by the washing of regeneration. For Pelagius's argument on this matter, which is attached, among his other condemnable statements, to the letter of the apostolic see, runs thus: 'If the soul', he says, 'is not by transmission, but the flesh alone has the transmission of sin, then the flesh alone deserves punishment. For it is unjust that a soul born today, not from the mass of Adam, should bear so ancient a sin belonging to another; for by no reasoning is it granted that God, who forgives one's own sins, should impute another's.'

### Translation notes

- The letters of Zosimus include his Tractoria (418). The quotation of Pelagius is from his commentary on Romans (on Rom 5:15), as cited in the papal letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.22 (CSEL 57:157–158; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-22).

## Letter 190.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-23
- Source: CSEL 57:158–160
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If Optatus cannot reconcile the creation of new souls with original sin, he must drop the theory, since infant baptism truly remits sins, as Zosimus's letter affirms.

### Latin text

Si ergo ita potes animarum adserere sine ulla propagine nouitatem, ut ratione iusta et a fide catholica non aliena etiam sic peccato primi hominis ostendantur obnoxiae. adsere. quod sentis, ut potes. si autem non eas aliter potes a propagatione facere alienas, nisi ut simul facias ab omni peccati uinculo liberas, cohibe te ab huius modi disputatione omni modo. non est enim falsa etiam in paruulorum baptismate remissio peccatorum nec uerbo tenus dicitur, sed ueraciter agitur. nam, ut iam uerbis utar, quae in ipsa epistula beatissimi antistitis Zosimi leguntur, fidelis dominus in uerbis suis eiusque baptismus re ac uerbis, id est opere, confessione et remissione uera peccatorum in omni sexu, aetate, condicione generis humani eandem plenitudinem tenet. nullus enim, nisi qui peccati seruus est, liber efficitur nec redemptus dici potest. nisi qui uere per peccatum fuerit ante captiuus. sicut scriptum est: Si uos filius liberauerit, uere liberi eritis. per ipsum enim renascimur spiritaliter, per ipsum crucifigimur mundo, ipsius morte mortis ab Adam omnibus nobis introductae atque transmissae uniuersae animae illud propagatione contractum chirographum rumpitur, in quo nullus omnino natorum, antequam per baptismum liberetur, non tenetur obnoxius. in his uerbis apostolicae sedis tam antiqua atque fundata, tam certa et clara est catholica fides. ut nefas sit de illa dubitare Christiano.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, you can assert the newness of souls without any propagation in such a way that, by just reasoning not foreign to the Catholic faith, they are shown even so to be liable to the first man's sin, assert what you think as best you can. But if you cannot make them strangers to propagation except by making them at the same time free from every bond of sin, restrain yourself completely from discussion of this kind. For the remission of sins even in the baptism of little children is not false, nor said in words only, but truly brought about. For, to use the words which are read in the letter of the most blessed bishop Zosimus himself: 'The Lord is faithful in his words, and his baptism holds the same fullness in reality and in words, that is, in deed, confession and true remission of sins, in every sex, age and condition of the human race. For no one is made free except one who is the slave of sin, nor can anyone be called redeemed except one who was truly captive before through sin, as it is written: If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. For through him we are spiritually reborn, through him we are crucified to the world; by his death is torn up that bond of death, brought in from Adam upon all of us and transmitted to every soul, the bond contracted by propagation, by which absolutely no one born is not held liable before being set free through baptism.' In these words of the apostolic see the Catholic faith is so ancient and well-founded, so certain and clear, that it would be wrong for a Christian to doubt it.

### Scripture references

- Ps 145:13 (144:13 Vulg.): allusion, medium confidence
- John 8:34: allusion, high confidence
- John 8:36: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Zosimus, Tractoria (fragment preserved here); Ps 145:13 (Vulg. 144:13, 'faithful in his words'); John 8:34, 36; Gal 6:14; Col 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.23 (CSEL 57:158–160; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-23).

## Letter 190.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-24
- Source: CSEL 57:160–161
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Better to leave the soul's origin unknown than to make God the author of sin, posit an evil nature, or empty infant baptism.

### Latin text

Quoniam ergo morte Christi non unius aut aliquarum sed uniuersae animae propagatione contractum mortis chirographum rumpitur, si potes animas sic alienas a propagatione defendere, ut tamen hoc chirographo. quod sola Christi morte rumpendum est. rectissima ratione demonstrentur obstrictae nec sua propagatione sed carnis hoc debito iuste appareant obligatae, non solum nemine prohibente defende. uerum etiam nobis, quo modo id tecum defendere possimus. ostende. si autem aliter non potes, quod de animarum nouitate sentis. adserere. nisi ut eas dicas peccato primi hominis non teneri aut per propagationem non suam sed carnis auctore deo uel nescio qua mali natura innocentissimas fieri peccatrices. melius origo animae latet, dum tamen eam non dubitemus dei esse creaturam quam uel deus peccati auctor dicitur uel contra deum aliena mali natura introducitur uel baptisma paruulorum inritum ducitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, by the death of Christ the bond of death contracted by propagation is torn up, not for one soul or some souls, but for every soul, if you can defend souls as strangers to propagation in such a way that they are nevertheless shown by entirely sound reasoning to be bound by this bond, which is to be torn up only by the death of Christ, and appear to be justly held by this debt not by their own propagation but by that of the flesh, then not only defend it, with no one forbidding you, but also show us how we may defend it with you. But if you cannot assert what you think about the newness of souls except by saying that they are not held by the first man's sin, or that, by a propagation not their own but of the flesh, they are made sinners, though most innocent, with God as author or by some nature of evil, it is better that the origin of the soul should remain hidden, provided we do not doubt that it is God's creature, than that God should be called the author of sin, or a foreign nature of evil be brought in against God, or the baptism of little children be held void.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:14. The 'nature of evil' alludes to Manichaean dualism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.24 (CSEL 57:160–161; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-24).

## Letter 190.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-25
- Source: CSEL 57:161
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever the origin of other souls, Christ's soul certainly contracted no sin from Adam.

### Latin text

Ut autem et a me tua dilectio de hac quaestione aliquid audiat definitum non parui aestimandum, immo praecipue necessarium atque retinendum, quo modo libet se origo habeat animarum, siue ex illa una siue ex nulla alia propagentur. mediatoris tamen animam nullum ex Adam traxisse peccatum dubitare fas non est. si enim nulla propagatur ex altera, ubi omnes tenentur propagata carne peccati, quanto minus credendum est ex propagine peccatricis animam uenire potuisse, cuius caro uenit ex uirgine non libidine concepta sed fide, ut esset in similitudine carnis peccati, non in carne peccati! si autem peccato primae animae peccatricis ideo ceterae tenentur obnoxiae, quia ex illa sunt propagatae, profecto illa, quam sibi unigenitus coaptauit, aut peccatum inde non traxit aut omnino inde non tracta est. neque enim non potuit animam sibi trahere sine peccato, qui soluit nostra peccata, aut, qui nouam creauit ei carni, quam sine parente fecit ex terra, non potuit nouam creare carni, quam sine uiro sumpsit ex femina.

### English translation (Claude)

But so that Your Affection may also hear from me something definite on this question, not to be thought of small account, indeed especially necessary and to be held: however the origin of souls stands, whether they are propagated from that one or from none, it is not lawful to doubt that the soul of the mediator drew no sin from Adam. For if no soul is propagated from another, while all are held by the propagated flesh of sin, how much less is it to be believed that his soul could have come from the propagation of a sinful soul, whose flesh came from a virgin, conceived not by lust but by faith, so as to be in the likeness of sinful flesh, not in sinful flesh! But if the other souls are liable to the sin of the first sinful soul because they have been propagated from it, then certainly the soul which the Only-begotten fitted to himself either drew no sin from there or was not drawn from there at all. For he who forgives our sins could not have been unable to draw a soul to himself without sin; nor could he who created a new soul for that flesh which he made from earth without a parent have been unable to create a new one for the flesh which he took from a woman without a man.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:3: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:3; Gen 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.25 (CSEL 57:161; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-25).

## Letter 190.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-26
- Source: CSEL 57:161–162
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by inviting Optatus to teach him anything certain on the soul's origin while keeping the faith and the peace of the Church.

### Latin text

Haec, sicut potui, non quidem ad me datis sed tamen ad carissimos nostros sanctitatis tuae litteris non peritia, quam desiderasti, sed sollicita dilectione respondi. si grate accipis et admonitionem fraternam et iam utilem non errando sed prudenter considerando cum ecclesiae pace conseruas, deo gratias. si autem me ista nondum nosse miraris uel etiam nec miraris et me aliquid certum de origine animarum salua ista fide, quae certissima atque clarissima est, mutua caritate docere non rennuis, multo uberius deo gratias. memor nostri domino semper uiuas, domine beatissime et sincera dilectione desiderabilis frater.

### English translation (Claude)

I have answered these things as I could, to the letter of Your Holiness, though not addressed to me but to our very dear friends, not with the expertise you desired but with anxious love. If you receive it gratefully and keep this brotherly warning, now useful not by erring but by careful consideration, in the peace of the Church, thanks be to God. And if you are surprised that I do not yet know these things, or even are not surprised, and do not refuse in mutual love to teach me something certain about the origin of souls, keeping that faith which is most certain and clear, much more abundant thanks be to God. May you live always to the Lord, remembering us, most blessed lord and brother, desired with sincere love.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 190.26 (CSEL 57:161–162; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/190-1/#p-190-26).

## Letter 191.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-191-1
- Source: CSEL 57:162–164
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine joyfully thanks the Roman presbyter Sixtus for his letter defending grace against the Pelagians, whose patron he had been rumoured to be.

### Latin text

Ex quo Hipponem litterae benignitatis tuae per sanctum fratrem nostrum Firmum presbyterum directae me absente uenerunt, posteaquam illas, cum remeassem, quamuis iam inde profecto earum perlatore legere potui, haec prima eademque gratissima rescribendi occurrit occasio per dilectissimum filium nostrum acolithum Albinum. quod autem, quibus simul scripsisti, tunc non eramus simul, ideo factum est, ut singulorum singulas. non unam amborum epistulam sumeres. a me quippe digressus est perlator huius per uenerabilem fratrem et coepiscopum meum Alypium, qui tuae sanctitati aliam rescriberet. transiturus. ad quem etiam ipsas. quas ego iam legeram. litteras tuas ipse portauit. quae nos quanta laetitia perfuderint, quid homo nitatur loqui, quod non potest eloqui? nec te ipsum satis nosse arbitror, sed nobis crede, quantum boni feceris talia nobis scripta mittendo. sicut enim tu testis es animi tui, ita nos nostri, quem ad modum sit affectus illarum sinceritate luculentissima litterarum. si enim breuissimam epistulam tuam, quam de hac ipsa re ad beatissimum senem Aurelium per Leonem acolithum direxisti, exultanti alacritate descripsimus et, quibus poteramus, magno studio legebamus. ubi nobis exposuisti, quid de illo perniciosissimo dogmate uel quid contra de gratia dei, quam pusillis magnisque largitur. cui est illud inimicissimum, sentias, quanta nos putas ista tua prolixiora scripta uel exultatione legisse uel cura. ut legantur. quibus ualuimus, aliis obtulisse atque adhuc, quibus ualemus. offerre! quid enim gratius legi uel audiri potest, quam gratiae dei tam pura defensio aduersus inimicos eius ex ore eius, qui eorundem inimicorum magni momenti patronus antea iactabatur? aut unde uberiores deo debemus agere gratias, quam quod eius sic defenditur gratia ab eis, quibus datur, aduersus eos, quibus uel non datur uel ingratum est, quod datur, quia, ut eis gratum sit. occulto et iusto iudicio dei non datur?

### English translation (Claude)

Since the letter of Your Kindness, sent through our holy brother the presbyter Firmus, reached Hippo in my absence, and I could read it only after I returned, when its bearer had already left, this is the first opportunity of replying that has presented itself, and a most welcome one, through our dearest son the acolyte Albinus. That we were not together then, though you wrote to us together, is why you are receiving separate letters from each of us, not one letter from both. For the bearer of this letter left me to pass through the territory of my venerable brother and fellow bishop Alypius, who would write a separate reply to Your Holiness; and he took to him your letter itself, which I had already read. With what great joy it filled us, how can a man try to say what cannot be expressed? Nor do I think you yourself know well enough; but believe us, how much good you did by sending us such a letter. For as you are witness of your own mind, so are we of ours, of how it was affected by the most luminous sincerity of that letter. For if we copied with exultant eagerness your very short letter on this same matter, sent to the most blessed old man Aurelius by the acolyte Leo, in which you set out to us what you think about that most pernicious teaching, and on the other side about the grace of God, which he bestows on small and great, and to which that teaching is utterly hostile, and read it with great zeal to whomever we could, with how much exultation do you think we have read this longer letter of yours, or with what care we have offered it, and still offer it, to whomever we can, to be read! For what could be read or heard with more pleasure than so pure a defence of God's grace against its enemies from the mouth of one who was previously boasted of as an important patron of those same enemies? Or for what should we give God more abundant thanks than that his grace is so defended by those to whom it is given against those to whom it is not given, or to whom what is given is not welcome, because, by the hidden and just judgment of God, it is not given them to welcome it?

### Translation notes

- Letter 191, to Sixtus, presbyter at Rome, later Pope Sixtus III (AD 418). Aurelius was bishop of Carthage.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 191.1 (CSEL 57:162–164; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-191-1).

## Letter 191.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-191-2
- Source: CSEL 57:164–165
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Sixtus to restrain open Pelagians, watch over those who spread the error secretly, and patiently teach those who have fallen silent out of fear.

### Latin text

Quapropter, domine uenerabilis et in Christi caritate suscipiende sancte frater, quamuis optime facias, cum de hac re scribis ad fratres, apud quos se illi de tua solent efferre amicitia, tamen haec cura maior tibi restat. ut non solum salubri seueritate plectantur, qui errorem illum Christiano infestissimum nomini audent garrire liberius, sed etiam hi diligentissime caueantur uigilantia pastorali propter infirmiores et simpliciores dominicas oues, qui eum pressius quidem atque timidius sed tamen insusurrare non cessant penetrantes domos, sicut ait apostolus, et cetera, quae sequuntur, exercitata impietate facientes. nec illi neglegendi sunt, qui usque ad profundum silentium supprimunt timore, quod sentiunt, sed tamen eandem peruersitatem sentire non desinunt. nonnulli quippe eorum, antequam ipsa pestilentia manifestissimo etiam sedis apostolicae iudicio damnaretur, uobis innotescere potuerunt. quos nunc repente reticuisse perspicitis nec, utrum sanati sint, sciri potest, nisi cum non solum dogmata illa falsa tacuerint, uerum etiam illis uera contraria eo, quo illa solent, studio defensauerint. qui tamen lenius sunt profecto tractandi; quid enim eos terreri opus est, quos satis territos ipsa taciturnitas monstrat? nec ideo tamquam sani praetereundi sunt diligentia medicinae. quorum uulnus in abdito est. etsi enim terrendi non sunt, tamen docendi sunt et, quantum existimo, facilius possunt. dum in eis timor seueritatis doctorem adiuuat ueritatis. ut opitulante domino gratia eius intellecta atque dilecta etiam loquendo expugnent. quod iam loqui non audent.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, venerable lord and holy brother, to be received in the love of Christ, although you do excellently in writing on this matter to the brothers among whom those men are wont to boast of your friendship, yet this greater care remains for you: not only that those who dare to babble more freely that error, most hostile to the Christian name, should be punished with salutary severity, but also that those should be most carefully guarded against with pastoral vigilance, for the sake of the Lord's weaker and simpler sheep, who do not cease to whisper it, more guardedly and timidly but still, 'making their way into houses', as the apostle says, and doing the other things that follow, with practised ungodliness. Nor should those be neglected who out of fear suppress what they think into deep silence, yet do not cease to hold the same perversity. For some of them could have become known to you before that pestilence was condemned by the most manifest judgment of the apostolic see as well; and you now see them suddenly silent, and whether they are healed cannot be known unless they not only stop speaking those false teachings, but also defend the true teachings contrary to them with the same zeal they used for the others. They should certainly be treated more gently; for what need is there to frighten those whom their very silence shows to be frightened enough? Yet they should not be passed over by the care of medicine as if healthy, because their wound is hidden. For even if they are not to be frightened, they are to be taught, and, as I think, can be the more easily, while fear of severity helps the teacher of truth in them; so that, with the Lord's help, once his grace is understood and loved, they may by speaking also fight down what they no longer dare to speak.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 3:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 3:6. Augustine's call for 'salutary severity' against those spreading the error is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 191.2 (CSEL 57:164–165; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-191-2).

## Letter 192.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-192-1
- Source: CSEL 57:165–166
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to the deacon Caelestinus with a meditation on love as a debt always paid and always owed, even to enemies.

### Latin text

Quamuis longe absens fuerim, quando per Proiectum clericum ad me directa Hipponem sanctitatis tuae scripta uenerunt, tamen. posteaquam ueni eisque lectis rescriptorum debitorem me factum esse cognoui. reddendi tempus opperiebar. et ecce subito profecturi a nobis carissimi fratris nostri Albini acolithi gratissima occurrit occasio. de tua igitur, quae mihi exoptatissima est, salute laetatus sanctitati tuae salutationem debitam reddo. semper autem debeo caritatem, quae sola etiam reddita semper detinet debitorem. redditur enim, cum inpenditur; debetur autem, etiamsi reddita fuerit, quia nullum est tempus, quando inpendenda iam non sit. nec. cum redditur. amittitur, sed potius reddendo multiplicatur; habendo enim redditur, non carendo. et cum reddi non possit, nisi habeatur. nec haberi potest, nisi reddatur; immo etiam, cum redditur ab homine, crescit in homine et tanto maior adquiritur, quanto plurius redditur. quo modo autem negatur amicis. quae debetur et inimicis? sed inimicis cauta inpenditur, amicis secura rependitur. agit tamen, quantum potest, ut ab his etiam, quibus pro malis bona retribuet, id recipiat, quod inpendit. optamus quippe fieri amicum, quem ueraciter diligimus inimicum, quia non eum diligimus, nisi uelimus bonum; quod utique non erit, nisi amiserit inimicitiarum malum.

### English translation (Claude)

Although I was far away when the letter of Your Holiness, sent to me through the cleric Projectus, reached Hippo, yet after I came and read it and recognized that I had become a debtor for a reply, I was waiting for a time to pay it; and see, suddenly a most welcome opportunity has arisen through our very dear brother, the acolyte Albinus, who is about to leave us. Rejoicing, then, in your well-being, which I greatly desire, I pay Your Holiness the greeting I owe. But I always owe love, which alone, even when paid, always keeps one a debtor. For it is paid when it is spent; but it is owed even when it has been paid, because there is no time when it is no longer to be spent. Nor is it lost when it is paid, but rather multiplied by being paid; for it is paid by having, not by lacking. And since it cannot be paid unless it is had, and it cannot be had unless it is paid, indeed when it is paid by a person it grows in that person, and the more of it is paid, the greater the amount acquired. How then can it be denied to friends, when it is owed even to enemies? But to enemies it is spent with caution, to friends it is repaid with confidence. Yet it strives as much as it can to receive back what it spends even from those to whom it returns good for evil. For we wish the enemy whom we truly love to become a friend, since we do not love him unless we wish him good, which certainly will not be unless he loses the evil of enmity.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 192, to Caelestinus, deacon at Rome, later Pope Celestine I (AD 418). Rom 13:8 underlies the whole letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 192.1 (CSEL 57:165–166; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-192-1).

## Letter 192.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-192-2
- Source: CSEL 57:166–167
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Unlike money, love grows by being given and demanded, so Augustine both repays and still owes Caelestinus love, as Rom 13:8 commands.

### Latin text

Non ergo sic inpenditur caritas ut pecunia. excepto enim, quod illa inpendendo minuitur, haec augetur. etiam illo inter se differunt, quod pecuniam cui dederimus, tunc ei beniuolentiores erimus, si recipere non quaeramus, non autem potest esse uerus caritatis inpensor, nisi fuerit benignus exactor, quoniam pecunia cum recipitur, accedit, cui datur, sed recedit. a quo datur, caritas uero non solum apud eum crescit. qui hanc ab eo, quem diligit, exigit, etiamsi non recipit, sed etiam ille, a quo eam recipit, tunc incipit habere, cum reddit. proinde, domine frater, mutuam tibi caritatem libens reddo gaudensque recipio; quam recipio, adhuc repeto, quam reddo, adhuc debeo. unum enim magistrum, apud quem condiscipuli sumus, per eius apostolum dociles audire debemus praecipientem ac dicentem: Nemini quicquam debeatis, nisi ut inuicem diligatis.

### English translation (Claude)

Love, then, is not spent like money. For apart from the fact that money is diminished by spending and love increased, they also differ in this: that to whomever we have given money, we shall be the kinder to him if we do not seek to get it back; but no one can be a true spender of love unless he is a kind exactor of it. For when money is received, it goes to the one to whom it is given but leaves the one by whom it is given; whereas love not only grows in the one who demands it from the one he loves, even if he does not receive it, but also the one from whom he receives it begins to have it at the moment he repays it. Accordingly, my lord brother, I gladly pay you mutual love and joyfully receive it; what I receive I still ask back, what I pay I still owe. For we ought to listen docilely to the one Master in whose school we are fellow pupils, as he commands through his apostle, saying: 'Owe no one anything, except to love one another.'

### Scripture references

- Matt 23:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 23:8; Rom 13:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 192.2 (CSEL 57:166–167; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-192-2).

## Letter 193.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-1
- Source: CSEL 57:167–168
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine apologizes to Mercator for his delayed reply, caused by business at Carthage and a journey to Mauretania.

### Latin text

Litterae dilectionis tuae, quas prius abs te missas apud Carthaginem accepi, tanto me affecerunt gaudio, ut etiam in posterioribus te suscensentem, quod tibi non rescripserim. gratissime acceperim. ipsa quippe indignatio tua non erat simultatis initium sed indicium caritatis. ut autem a Carthagine non rescriberem, non occasio defuit perlatorum, sed alia magis urgentia, donec inde proficisceremur, nos occupatissimos et intentissimos continebant. cum uero inde digressi sumus, perreximus usque ad Mauretaniam Caesariensem, quo nos ecclesiastica necessitas traxit. per quas totas terras cum intentionem nostram huc atque illuc, quae ingerebantur sensibus diuersa, raptarent, nullius, ut tibi rescriberem. adfuit admonitoris instantia, nulla occurrit opportunitas perlatoris. deinde remeans alias apud nostros iam querela exasperatas litteras tuae sinceritatis inueni et alium aduersus nouos haereticos librum refertum sanctarum testimoniis paginarum. quibus lectis excursisque etiam illis, quae primum miseras, quia et carissimi fratris nostri Albini ecclesiae Romanae acolithi opportunissima se offerebat occasio, rescribendum fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

The letter of Your Affection which you sent first, and which I received at Carthage, gave me such joy that I received most gladly even your later one, in which you were angry that I had not replied to you. For your very indignation was not the beginning of a quarrel but a sign of love. That I did not reply from Carthage was not for lack of opportunity of bearers; but other more urgent matters kept us extremely busy and occupied until we left. And when we left, we went on as far as Mauretania Caesariensis, where church business took us. Through all those lands, while various things pressing on our senses snatched our attention this way and that, there was no insistent reminder to make me reply to you, nor did any opportunity of a bearer occur. Then on returning I found among our people another letter from Your Sincerity, already sharpened by complaint, and another book against the new heretics, filled with testimonies from the holy pages. Having read these, and having also gone through what you had sent first, I had to reply, since the most convenient opportunity was offered by our very dear brother Albinus, acolyte of the Roman Church.

### Translation notes

- Letter 193, to Marius Mercator, a layman then at Rome who wrote against the Pelagians (AD 418).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.1 (CSEL 57:167–168; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-1).

## Letter 193.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-2
- Source: CSEL 57:168
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine welcomes Mercator's anti-Pelagian writings and encourages him to persevere, since many wise defenders are the world's health.

### Latin text

Ego itaque te, fili dilectissime, scribentem mihi uel ad me consideranda tua scripta mittentem absit ut neglegenter accipiam uel superba uanitate contemnam. praesertim cum mihi de te gaudium tanto maius sit, quanto magis inopinatum inprouisumque prouenit: fateor enim. tantum te profecisse nesciebam. et quid nobis esse debet optatius. quam ut abundent. qui errores infestantes catholicam fidem et insidiantes......... ineruditisque fratribus infirmis usquequaque redarguant et ecclesiam Christi aduersus profanas uocum nouitates acriter fideliterque defendant, quando quidem, sicut scriptum est multitudo sapientium sanitas est orbis terrarum? inspexi ergo cor tuum in scriptis tuis, quantum potui, et inueni amplectendum et hortandum, ut perseuerantissima diligentia in anteriora te extendas adiuuante domino uires tuas, qui tibi eas, quas nutriret, dedit

### English translation (Claude)

Far be it from me, then, my dearest son, to receive you carelessly when you write to me or send me your writings to consider, or to despise you with proud vanity, especially since my joy about you is the greater the more unexpected and unforeseen it came; for I confess I did not know you had made such progress. And what should be more desired by us than that there should be an abundance of those who everywhere refute the errors attacking the Catholic faith and lying in wait … for the weak and untaught brothers, and who defend the Church of Christ keenly and faithfully against profane novelties of words, since, as it is written, 'a multitude of the wise is the health of the world'? So I have looked into your heart in your writings, as far as I could, and found it to be embraced and encouraged to stretch forward to what lies ahead with most persevering diligence, the Lord helping your powers, who gave them to you so that he might nourish them.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:20: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 6:24 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text has a gap marked by dots after 'insidiantes'; shown as '…'. 1 Tim 6:20; Wis 6:24 (extrabiblical on this site); Phil 3:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.2 (CSEL 57:168; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-2).

## Letter 193.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-3
- Source: CSEL 57:168–169
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians concede that infants believe through their sponsors; then, by John 3:36, unbaptized infants are unbelievers on whom God's wrath remains, which can only be from original sin.

### Latin text

fn autem parum ueritati propinquarunt in quaestione de baptismo paruulorum, quos deuios in uiam reuocare conamur. cum infantulum quamlibet recenti partu matris effusum tamen per eos, a quibus baptizandus offertur, credere confitentur. cum enim dicunt, sicut scribis, non infantes ita credere in remissionem peccatorum, tamquam et illis remittantur, quos nullum putant habere peccatum, sed, quia ipsi quoque idem lauacrum percipiunt. quo fit, in quibuscumque fit. remissio peccatorum. hanc fieri credere in aliis, quae non fit in eis. cum ergo dicunt non ita credunt, sed ita credunt, profecto eos non ambigunt credere. audiant itaque dominum: Qui credit in filium, habet uitam aeternam; qui autem incredulus est filio. non uidebit uitam, sed ira dei manet super eum. quapropter infantes. quia per alios fiunt credentes, a quibus baptizandi offeruntur, per illos utique sunt increduli, si apud tales sunt, qui eos, dum nihil prodesse credunt, offerendos esse non credunt, ac per hoc, si per credentes credunt et habent uitam aeternam, profecto per incredulos increduli sunt et non uidebunt uitam, sed ira dei manet super eos. non enim dictum est uenit super eos. sed manet super eos quia ex origine erat iam in eis nec omnino nisi gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum aufertur ab eis. de hac ira legitur etiam in libro Iob: Homo natus ex muliere breuis uitae et plenus iracundia. unde igitur ira dei super innocentiam paruuli nisi originalis sorte ac sorde peccati? de qua in eodem libro itidem scriptum est non esse ab hac mundum nec infantem, cuius est unius diei uita super terram.

### English translation (Claude)

Those whom we are trying to call back from their straying into the way have come not a little nearer the truth in the question of the baptism of little children, when they confess that an infant, however recently poured forth from its mother's womb, nevertheless believes through those by whom it is presented for baptism. For when they say, as you write, that infants do not believe in the remission of sins in the sense that sins are remitted to them too, since they think they have no sin, but that, since they too receive the same washing by which remission of sins takes place in whomever it takes place, they believe that this takes place in others, though it does not take place in them: when they say, then, 'They do not believe in this way, but they do believe in that way', they certainly do not doubt that they believe. Let them hear the Lord, then: 'Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; but whoever does not believe the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.' Therefore infants, since they become believers through others by whom they are presented for baptism, are certainly unbelievers through others if they are with people who do not believe they should be presented, because they believe it does them no good. And so, if through believers they believe and have eternal life, surely through unbelievers they are unbelievers and will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on them. For it is not said 'comes upon them' but 'remains on them', because it was already in them from their origin and is not taken away from them at all except by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Of this wrath we read also in the book of Job: 'Man born of woman is short of life and full of wrath.' Whence, then, the wrath of God upon the innocence of a little child, except from the lot and stain of original sin? Of which it is likewise written in the same book that not even an infant whose life on earth is one day is clean of it.

### Scripture references

- John 3:36: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: allusion, medium confidence
- Job 14:1: quotation, high confidence
- Job 14:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The opening of the section is damaged in the digital text ('fn autem parum'); translated by sense ('not a little'). John 3:36; Rom 7:25; Job 14:1; Job 14:4–5 (Old Latin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.3 (CSEL 57:168–169; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-3).

## Letter 193.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-4
- Source: CSEL 57:169–170
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Having admitted that infants believe, the Pelagians must accept that unbaptized infants, as unbelievers, are condemned, which implies original sin.

### Latin text

Non ergo in istis nihil egit, quod aduersus eos instantissime disputatur et eorum auribus catholicae uoces hinc atque inde circumsonant, quando quidem uolentes argumentari contra sacramenta ecclesiae confessi sunt tamen paruulos credere. non eis ergo promittant uitam, etiamsi non fuerint baptizati; de qua enim alia uita dicitur: Qui incredulus est filio. non uidebit uitam? nec eos a regno caelorum sic fateantur alienos, ut tamen a damnatione defendant; nam quid nisi damnatio significatur per iram, quam dominus super non credentem manere testatur? multum prorsus accessum est et sine scrupulosa conflictatione causa finita est. si enim concedunt paruulos credere, procul dubio, sicut eos tenet illa sententia: Qui non renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu. non intrabit in regnum caelorum, sic etiam ista, quae eiusdem domini est: Qui crediderit et baptizatus fuerit, saluus erit; qui autem non crediderit. condemnabitur. quia ergo, cum paruuli baptizantur. fatentur isti eos esse credentes, damnari non dubitent non credentes et audeant iam dicere, si possunt, a iusto deo damnari nihil mali ex origine trahentes et peccati contagium non habentes.

### English translation (Claude)

So it has not been for nothing in their case that they have been argued against so persistently and that Catholic voices have rung round their ears on every side, since, wishing to argue against the sacraments of the Church, they have nevertheless confessed that little children believe. Let them not, then, promise them life even if they have not been baptized; for of what other life is it said, 'Whoever does not believe the Son will not see life'? Nor let them confess them strangers to the kingdom of heaven while still defending them from condemnation; for what is signified by the wrath which the Lord testifies remains on the unbeliever, if not condemnation? A great advance has been made indeed, and the case is ended without painstaking conflict. For if they grant that little children believe, then beyond doubt, just as they are bound by that sentence, 'Whoever is not reborn of water and the Spirit will not enter the kingdom of heaven', so also by this one of the same Lord: 'Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; but whoever does not believe will be condemned.' Since, then, they confess that little children are believers when they are baptized, let them not doubt that unbelievers are condemned, and let them now dare to say, if they can, that those who draw no evil from their origin and have no contagion of sin are condemned by a just God.

### Scripture references

- John 3:36: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 16:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 3:36; John 3:5; Mark 16:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.4 (CSEL 57:169–170; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-4).

## Letter 193.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-5
- Source: CSEL 57:170–171
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Enoch and Elijah, who did not die, do not disprove that bodily death is the punishment of sin; God may remit the penalty to some.

### Latin text

Illud uero, quod in litteris tuis commemorasti obicere nobis Enoch et Heliam, quod mortui non fuerint, sed cum suis corporibus ex ista hominum conuersatione translati, quid eos ad hoc, unde agitur, adiuuet, non intellego. ut enim omittam, quod ipsi quoque morituri postea perhibentur, sicut plerique exponunt Apocalypsin Iohannis de duobus illis prophetis, de quibus tacitis eorum nominibus loquitur, quod isti duo sancti cum suis tunc corporibus apparebunt, in quibus nunc uiuunt. ut etiam ipsi quem ad modum ceteri martyres pro Christi ueritate moriantur, ut ergo hoc omittam, ista quaestione dilata. quo modo libet sese habeat. quid istos adiuuat, quaeso te neque enim hinc ostendunt non propter peccatum homines secundum corpus mori. nam si deus, qui tam multis fidelibus suis donat ipsa peccata, uoluit quibusdam etiam istam poenam donare peccati, qui nos sumus, qui respondeamus deo, cur; alius sic alius autem sic?

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you mention in your letter, that they object to us Enoch and Elijah, that they did not die but were taken from this human life with their bodies, I do not understand how it helps them on the point at issue. To pass over the fact that they too are said to be going to die later, as many expound the Apocalypse of John concerning those two prophets of whom it speaks without naming them, namely that these two saints will then appear with the bodies in which they now live, so that they too may die for the truth of Christ like the other martyrs: to pass over this, then, leaving this question aside, however it stands, how does it help them, I ask you? For they do not show from this that human beings do not die in the body because of sin. For if God, who forgives so many of his faithful their very sins, willed to remit to some even this punishment of sin, who are we to answer back to God why one is treated one way and another another?

### Scripture references

- Gen 5:24: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Kgs 2:11: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 11:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 5:24; 2 Kgs 2:11; Rev 11:3–12 (the two witnesses, identified by many with Enoch and Elijah); Rom 9:20; 1 Cor 7:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.5 (CSEL 57:170–171; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-5).

## Letter 193.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-6
- Source: CSEL 57:171
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Death entered through sin, so that no one dies except because of sin, even if God spares some from dying, just as no one is justified except through Christ.

### Latin text

Dicimus ergo. quod apertissime apostolus ait: Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem uita est propter iustitiam. si autem spiritus eius, qui suscitauit Christum a mortuis, habitat in uobis, qui suscitauit Christum a mortuis, uiuificabit et mortalia corpora uestra per inhabitantem spiritum eius in uobis. nec tamen ista sic dicimus. ut negemus deum posse, in quibus uoluerit, nunc facere sine morte. quod sine dubitatione credimus in tam multis facturum esse post mortem; nec ideo tamen illud falsum erit, quod per unum hominem peccatum in hunc mundum intrauit et per peccatum mors et ita in omnes homines pertransiit. hoc enim dictum est, quia, nisi per peccatum mors intrasset, nulla mors esset. nam et cum dicimus: Omnes propter peccata mittuntur in gehennam, numquid ideo falsum dicimus, quia non omnes homines mittuntur in gehennam? illud quippe ideo uerum est, non quia omnis homo mittitur, sed quia nullus nisi peccatorum meritis mittitur. talis est e contrario etiam illa sententia: Per unius iustificationem in omnes homines ad iustificationem uitae; non enim omnes homines pertinent ad iustificationem Christi, sed hoc dictum est, quia nemo iustificatur nisi per Christum.

### English translation (Claude)

We say, then, what the apostle says most plainly: 'The body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Christ from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.' Yet we do not say this so as to deny that God can now do without death, in whomever he wills, what we believe without doubt he will do in so many after death. Nor will it therefore be false that 'through one man sin entered this world, and through sin death, and so it passed to all men.' For this was said because, unless death had entered through sin, there would be no death. For when we say, 'All are sent into hell for their sins', do we say something false because not all human beings are sent into hell? That is true not because every human being is sent there but because no one is sent there except for the deserts of sins. Of the same kind, conversely, is that saying, 'Through the justification of one it comes upon all men to justification of life'; for not all human beings belong to the justification of Christ, but it was said because no one is justified except through Christ.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:10–11; Rom 5:12; Rom 5:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.6 (CSEL 57:171; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-6).

## Letter 193.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-7
- Source: CSEL 57:171–172
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The real difficulty is why the baptized still die, which Augustine treated in his books on infant baptism; that the justified Elijah did not die is no difficulty.

### Latin text

Magis ergo illa quaestio non inmerito mouet, cur poena peccati peccato non remanente remanet, id est si mors etiam corporis poena peccati est, ista potius aliqua quaestio est, cur moriatur infans, cum fuerit baptizatus, quam cur mortuus non sit Helias, cum fuerit iustificatus. illius enim finito peccato mouet, cur secuta sit poena peccati: huius autem finito peccato mouere non debet, si non sequatur poena peccati. si ergo illam quaestionem de morte baptizatorum. cur facta abolitione peccati sequatur tamen quaedam poena peccati. in libris de baptismo paruulorum, quos tibi scio esse notissimos. quantum potuimus, domino adiuuante dissoluimus. quanto minus ista mouere nos debet, ubi dicitur: Quare iustus Helias mortuus non est, si mors poena peccati est? quasi diceretur: Quare peccator Helias mortuus non est, si mors poena peccati est?

### English translation (Claude)

So it is the other question that more reasonably troubles us: why the punishment of sin remains when the sin does not remain. That is, if death even of the body is the punishment of sin, it is rather a question why an infant dies after being baptized than why Elijah did not die after being justified. For in the former case, when the sin is ended, it is puzzling why the punishment of sin has followed; but in the latter, when the sin is ended, it should not be puzzling if the punishment of sin does not follow. If, then, we have solved as far as we could, with the Lord's help, that question about the death of the baptized, why, after the abolition of sin, some punishment of sin still follows, in the books on the baptism of little children, which I know are very well known to you, how much less should this question trouble us, when it is said, 'Why did the righteous Elijah not die, if death is the punishment of sin?', as if it were said, 'Why did the sinner Elijah not die, if death is the punishment of sin?'

### Translation notes

- Augustine, On the Merits and Remission of Sins 2.30.49–2.34.56.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.7 (CSEL 57:171–172; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-7).

## Letter 193.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-8
- Source: CSEL 57:172
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Enoch and Elijah were removed from this life precisely because no one lives here without sin, and they will probably die at the world's end.

### Latin text

Nisi forte aliud ex alio mouent et dicunt: Si Enoch et Helias usque adeo non habebant peccatum. ut nec mortem, quae peccati est poena, paterentur, quo modo nemo hic uiuit sine peccato? quasi non eis probabilius respondeatur: Ideo, quos finitis peccatis uoluit deus uiuere, non hic permissi sunt uiuere, quoniam hic quisquam sine peccato non potest uiuere. sed haec atque huius modi aduersus istos dici potuerunt, si pro certo alicunde conuincerent illos numquam esse morituros. cum uero id docere non possint, melius ergo creditur Enoch et Heliam morituros in mundi fine, meliusque cum illos uenturos credatur ad mortem, nihil est, cur eos uelint nobis obicere causae suae nulla ex parte aliquid profuturos.

### English translation (Claude)

Unless perhaps they raise one question from another and say: 'If Enoch and Elijah were so far without sin that they did not even suffer death, which is the punishment of sin, how is it that no one lives here without sin?' As if it could not be answered them more plausibly: Those whom God willed to live with their sins ended were for that reason not allowed to live here, since here no one can live without sin. But these and similar things could have been said against them if they could prove from somewhere for certain that those two will never die. But since they cannot show this, it is better believed that Enoch and Elijah will die at the end of the world; and since it is better believed that they will come to death, there is no reason why they should object them to us, since they will not help their cause in any respect.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.8 (CSEL 57:172; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-8).

## Letter 193.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-9
- Source: CSEL 57:172–173
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul seems to say that some found alive at Christ's coming will not die but be changed and caught up, though this does not help the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Illi autem, de quibus dixit apostolus, cum loqueretur de resurrectione mortuorum: Et nos uiuentes qui reliqui sumus, simul cum illis rapiemur nubibus obuiam Christo in aera et ita semper cum domino erimus. adferunt quidem aliquid quaestionis, sed per se ipsos non propter istos. nam etsi non sunt etiam ipsi morituri, quid istos adiuuent omnino non uideo. cum talia de his dici possint, qualia de illis dicta sunt duobus. sed re uera, quantum ad uerba beati apostoli pertinet, uidetur adserere quosdam in fine saeculi adueniente domino, cum futura est resurrectio mortuorum, non esse morituros, sed uiuos repertos in illam inmortalitatem, quae sanctis etiam ceteris datur, repente mutandos et simul cum illis rapiendos, sicut dicit, in nubibus; nec aliquid aliud mihi uisum est, quotiens de his uerbis uolui cogitare.

### English translation (Claude)

But those of whom the apostle spoke, when he was speaking of the resurrection of the dead, 'And we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord', do raise some question, but on their own account, not because of these men. For even if they too are not going to die, I do not see at all how they help these men, since things can be said of them like those said of those two. But in truth, as far as the words of the blessed apostle go, he seems to assert that some at the end of the world, when the Lord comes and the resurrection of the dead is to take place, will not die, but, found alive, will be suddenly changed into that immortality which is given to the other saints too, and caught up together with them, as he says, in the clouds; nor has anything else seemed right to me whenever I have wished to think about these words.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 4:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 4:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.9 (CSEL 57:172–173; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-9).

## Letter 193.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-10
- Source: CSEL 57:173–174
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine would welcome correction from more learned interpreters, since other texts suggest all must die before resurrection, and his own writings have no canonical authority.

### Latin text

Sed uellem hinc potius audire doctiores, ne illis etiam. qui putant aliquos morte non praecedente uiuificatos ad uitam perpetuam transituros, dicere inueniatur apostolus: Stulte, tu quod seminas, non uiuificatur, nisi prius moriatur. nam et illud, quod in plerisque codicibus legitur, omnes resurgemus unde fieri poterit, nisi omnes moriamur? resurrectio quippe, nisi mors praecesserit, nulla est. et quod nonnulli codices habent omnes dormiemus, multo facilius et apertius id cogit intellegi. et si quid aliud tale in sanctis litteris inuenitur, ad id uidetur inpellere, ut nullus hominum existimetur inmortalitatem, nisi mors praecesserit, adepturus. proinde ubi dixit apostolus: Et nos uiuentes qui reliqui sumus in aduentum domini, non praeueniemus eos, qui ante dormierunt. ipse enim dominus in iussu, in uoce archangeli et in tuba dei descendet de caelo et mortui in Christo resurgent primi; deinde nos uiuentes qui reliqui sumus, simul cum illis rapiemur in nubibus obuiam Christo in aera et ita semper cum domino erimus, uellem, sicut dixi, de his audire doctiores et. si modo potuerint haec ita exponi, ut in eis possit intellegi omnes homines, qui uiuunt uel post nos uicturi sunt, esse morituros. corrigere, quod hinc aliquando aliter sensi. neque enim debemus indociles esse doctores et certe melius homo corrigitur paruus, quam frangitur durus. cum his, quae scripsimus. ita nostra uel aliorum exerceatur et erudiatur infirmitas, ut tamen in eis nulla uelut canonica constituatur auctoritas.

### English translation (Claude)

But I should prefer to hear more learned men on this, lest the apostle be found saying even to those who think that some will pass to eternal life made alive without death preceding: 'Fool, what you sow is not made alive unless it first dies.' For also what we read in most manuscripts, 'We shall all rise', how could it come about unless we all die? For there is no resurrection unless death has gone before. And what some manuscripts have, 'We shall all sleep', compels this understanding much more easily and plainly. And if anything else of the kind is found in the holy writings, it seems to drive to the conclusion that no human being is to be thought to attain immortality unless death has preceded. Therefore, where the apostle said, 'And we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, shall not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself, at the command, at the voice of the archangel and at the trumpet of God, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first; then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord', I should like, as I said, to hear more learned men on these words; and if they can be so expounded that it can be understood in them that all human beings who live, or will live after us, will die, I should like to correct what I once thought otherwise about this. For we ought not to be teachers unwilling to be taught; and certainly it is better for a little man to be corrected than for a hard one to be broken. Let our weakness, or that of others, be so exercised and instructed by what we have written that no quasi-canonical authority is established in it.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:36: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:51: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:15: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 4:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:36; 1 Cor 15:51 (variant readings 'we shall all rise' and 'we shall all sleep'); 1 Thess 4:15–17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.10 (CSEL 57:173–174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-10).

## Letter 193.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-11
- Source: CSEL 57:174
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If Paul means that some will not die, this fits the creed's 'living and dead' as those alive or dead at Christ's coming, and the other texts must then be reconciled.

### Latin text

Si autem in his uerbis apostoli nullus alius sensus potuerit reperiri et hoc eum intellegi uoluisse claruerit. quod uidentur uerba ipsa clamare, id est quod futuri sint in fine saeculi et in aduentu domini, qui non expolientur corpore, sed superinduantur inmortalitate, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita. huic sententiae procul dubio conueniet, quod in regula fidei confitemur uenturum dominum iudicaturum uiuos et mortuos. ut non hic intellegamus uiuos iustos, mortuos autem iniustos, quamuis iudicandi sint iusti et iniusti, sed uiuos. quos nondum exisse. mortuos autem, quos iam exisse de corporibus aduentus eius inueniet. quae si ita esse constiterit, illa uerba excutienda erunt, quo modo sic accipiemus tu quod seminas, non uiuificatur, nisi moriatur et omnes resurgemus siue omnes dormiemus, ut non aduersentur huic sententiae, qua quidam creduntur etiam cum suis corporibus in aeternum non degustata morte uicturi.

### English translation (Claude)

But if no other sense can be found in these words of the apostle, and it becomes clear that he meant to be understood what the words themselves seem to cry out, namely that there will be at the end of the world and at the Lord's coming those who will not be stripped of the body but clothed over with immortality, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life, then beyond doubt there will fit this view what we confess in the rule of faith, that the Lord will come to judge the living and the dead; so that we do not understand here by the living the righteous and by the dead the unrighteous, although both righteous and unrighteous are to be judged, but by the living those whom his coming will find not yet gone out of their bodies, and by the dead those whom it will find already gone out. If this is established, those words will have to be examined, how we are to take 'What you sow is not made alive unless it dies', and 'We shall all rise', or 'We shall all sleep', so that they do not contradict this view, by which some are believed to be going to live for ever even with their bodies without tasting death.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:4: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:36: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:51: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:4; the creed ('to judge the living and the dead'); 1 Cor 15:36, 51.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.11 (CSEL 57:174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-11).

## Letter 193.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-12
- Source: CSEL 57:174–175
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whatever the answer, bodily death would not have come without sin, and the resurrection of the righteous shows grace more wonderfully than exemption from death.

### Latin text

Sed utrumlibet horum ueracior ac perspicacior intellectus inueniatur, quid ad causam pertinet istorum. siue omnes debita morte plectantur siue aliquibus ab hac condicione parcatur, cum tamen constet mortem non solum animae uerum etiam corporis secuturam non fuisse, si peccatum non praecessisset, et gratiae mirabiliore uirtute iustos a morte ad aeternam beatitudinem reuiuiscere, quam in mortis experientiam non uenire? haec propter illos. de quibus mihi scripsisti, satis dicta sint, quamuis eos iam non existimem dicere, etiamsi non peccasset Adam, fuisse uel corpore moriturum.

### English translation (Claude)

But whichever of these understandings is found truer and clearer, what has it to do with these men's cause? Whether all are struck by the death owed, or some are spared from this condition, it is nevertheless established that death not only of the soul but also of the body would not have followed if sin had not preceded, and that it is by a more wonderful power of grace that the righteous come to life again from death to eternal blessedness than if they did not come to the experience of death at all. Let this be enough said about those of whom you wrote to me, although I do not think they now say that Adam would have died even in body if he had not sinned.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.12 (CSEL 57:174–175; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-12).

## Letter 193.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-13
- Source: CSEL 57:175–176
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Mercator to send anything definite he finds on whether some will not die, since he loves learning more than teaching and God alone gives growth.

### Latin text

Ceterum quod adtinet ad quaestionem resurrectionis, propter illos. qui creduntur non esse morituri sed ex hac mortalitate ad inmortalitatem sine media morte transituri, inquisitio diligentior adhibenda est et, si quid hinc absolutum ac definitum disputatione rationabili atque perfecta uel audisti uel legisti uel etiam ipse excogitare potuisti siue adhuc audire aut legere aut excogitare potueris. peto mihi mittere non graueris. ego enim, quod confitendum est caritati tuae, plus amo discere quam docere. nam haec admonemur etiam dicente apostolo Iacobo: Sit autem omnis homo uelox ad audiendum, tardus ad loquendum. ut ergo discamus, inuitare nos debet suauitas ueritatis: ut autem doceamus, cogere necessitas caritatis. ubi potius optandum est, ut transeat ista necessitas. qua hominem docet aliquid homo, ut simus omnes dociles deo. quamuis hoc simus. cum ea, quae ad ueram pietatem pertinent, discimus. etiam quando illa docere uidetur homo. quia neque qui plantat. est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus. cum itaque, si deus incrementum non daret, nihil essent apostoli plantatores et rigatores, quanto magis ego uel tu uel quilibet huius temporis homines. quando nobis uidemur esse doctores!

### English translation (Claude)

For the rest, as regards the question of the resurrection, a more careful enquiry must be made because of those who are believed not to be going to die but to pass from this mortality to immortality without death in between; and if you have heard or read anything settled and definite on this by reasoned and complete argument, or have been able to work it out yourself, or can still hear, read or work it out, I ask you not to be reluctant to send it to me. For, as I must confess to Your Charity, I love learning more than teaching. For we are admonished to this also by the apostle James, who says: 'Let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak.' The sweetness of truth, then, should invite us to learn; the necessity of love should compel us to teach. Here it is rather to be wished that this necessity by which one human being teaches another may pass away, so that we may all be taught by God; although we are so even now, when we learn what belongs to true piety, even when a human being seems to teach it, since 'neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth'. Since, then, if God did not give the growth, the apostles, as planters and waterers, would be nothing, how much more I, or you, or any people of this time, when we think ourselves teachers!

### Scripture references

- Jas 1:19: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:45: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jas 1:19; John 6:45 (Isa 54:13); 1 Cor 3:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 193.13 (CSEL 57:175–176; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-193-13).

## Letter 194.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-1
- Source: CSEL 57:176–177
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Sixtus of his joy that Sixtus, once rumoured to favour the Pelagians, has anathematized them and written clearly in defence of grace.

### Latin text

In epistula, quam per carissimum fratrem nostrum Albinum acolithum misi, prolixiorem me missurum esse promisi per sanctum fratrem et conpresbyterum nostrum Firmum. qui nobis litteras adtulit sinceritatis tuae plenas sinceritate fidei tuae. quae nobis tantum gaudium contulerunt, quantum magis possumus habere quam dicere. quod enim fatendum est caritati tuae, tristes eramus nimis, cum fama iactaret inimicis Christianae gratiae te fauere. sed ut haec tristitia de nostris cordibus tergeretur, primo te priorem anathema eis in populo frequentissimo pronuntiasse eadem fama non tacuit: deinde cum litteris apostolicae sedis de illorum damnatione ad Africam missis tuae quoque litterae ad uenerabilem senem Aurelium consecutae sunt, quae tametsi breues erant, tuum tamen uigorem aduersus eorum errorem satis indicabant: nunc uero cum apertius et latius, quid de illo dogmate contraque sentires, in litteris tuis fides ipsa nobiscum Romanae ecclesiae loqueretur, cui potissimum beatus apostolus Paulus de gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum multa et multipliciter est locutus. non solum illud omne tristitiae nubilum fugit de cordibus nostris, sed etiam tantum ibi laetitiae lumen infulsit, ut nihil egisse in nobis uideretur ille maeror et timor nisi successurorum ampliorem flagrantiam gaudiorum.

### English translation (Claude)

In the letter I sent through our very dear brother the acolyte Albinus, I promised to send a longer one through our holy brother and fellow presbyter Firmus, who brought us the letter of Your Sincerity, full of the sincerity of your faith, which gave us more joy than we can express. For, as I must confess to Your Charity, we were very sad when report spread that you favoured the enemies of Christian grace. But so that this sadness might be wiped from our hearts, first the same report did not keep silent that you had been the first to pronounce anathema on them before a very large congregation; then, when the letter of the apostolic see about their condemnation had been sent to Africa, your letter too followed to the venerable old man Aurelius, which, though short, showed clearly enough your vigour against their error. But now, when in your letter the very faith of the Roman Church spoke with us more openly and fully about what you think of that teaching and on the other side (the Church to which above all the blessed apostle Paul spoke much and in many ways about the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord), not only has every cloud of sadness fled from our hearts, but so great a light of joy has shone there that that grief and fear seem to have done nothing in us but make the joys that followed burn more brightly.

### Translation notes

- Letter 194, to Sixtus, presbyter at Rome, later Pope Sixtus III (AD 418), a short treatise on grace.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.1 (CSEL 57:176–177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-1).

## Letter 194.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-2
- Source: CSEL 57:177–178
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Sixtus to deal with three kinds of Pelagians: open defenders to be restrained, secret propagandists to be tracked down, and silent sympathizers to be patiently taught.

### Latin text

Itaque te, frater carissime, quamuis non uideamus oculis carnis, animo tamen in fide Christi, in gratia Christi, in membris Christi tenemus, amplectimur. osculamur et remeante a nobis ad te nostrorum inuicem conloquiorum sanctissimo et fidelissimo perlatore, quem uoluisti esse apud nos non solum aduectorem scriptorum tuorum uerum etiam narratorem testemque factorum, rescripta persoluimus et aliquanto diutius tecum sermocinamur admonentes, ut docendis instes, quibus terrendis satis, quantum comperimus, institisti. sunt enim quidam, qui iustissime damnatas impietates adhuc liberius defendendas putant, et sunt, qui occultius penetrant domos et, quod in aperto clamare iam metuunt. in secreto seminare non quiescunt, sunt autem. qui omnino siluerunt magno timore compressi. sed adhuc corde retinent, quod ore iam proferre non audent, qui tamen esse fratribus possunt ex priore ipsius dogmatis defensione notissimi. proinde alii seuerius cohercendi. alii uigilantius uestigandi. alii tractandi quidem lenius sed non segnius sunt docendi, ut. si non timentur. ne perdant, non tamen neglegantur. ne pereant.

### English translation (Claude)

So, dearest brother, although we do not see you with the eyes of the flesh, yet in spirit, in the faith of Christ, in the grace of Christ, in the members of Christ, we hold you, embrace you, kiss you; and as the most holy and faithful bearer of our mutual conversations returns from us to you, whom you wished to be with us not only the carrier of your writings but also the narrator and witness of events, we pay our reply and talk with you somewhat at greater length, urging you to press on with teaching those whom, as far as we have learned, you have pressed enough with fear. For there are some who think the most justly condemned impieties should still be defended more freely; and there are those who make their way more secretly into houses and do not cease to sow in secret what they now fear to shout in the open; and there are those who, held down by great fear, have fallen completely silent, but still retain in their hearts what they no longer dare to utter with their lips, and who may nevertheless be very well known to the brothers from their earlier defence of that teaching. Accordingly, some are to be restrained more severely, some to be tracked down more vigilantly, and some to be treated indeed more gently, but taught not less diligently, so that, if they are not feared as likely to destroy others, they may still not be neglected so as to perish.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 3:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 3:6. Augustine's advice to 'restrain more severely' is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.2 (CSEL 57:177–178; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-2).

## Letter 194.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-3
- Source: CSEL 57:178
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Denying that a good will needs God's help inflates rather than strengthens free choice.

### Latin text

Quod enim putant auferri sibi liberum arbitrium. si nec ipsam bonam uoluntatem sine adiutorio dei hominem habere consenserint, non intellegunt non se firmare humanum arbitrium sed inflare, ut per inania feratur, non in domino tamquam in petra stabili conlocetur; paratur enim uoluntas a domino.

### English translation (Claude)

For as to their thinking that free choice is taken away from them if they agree that a human being does not have even a good will without God's help, they do not understand that they are not strengthening human choice but inflating it, so that it is carried through empty space instead of being set on the Lord as on a firm rock; for 'the will is prepared by the Lord'.

### Scripture references

- Prov 8:35: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 40:2 (39:3 LXX): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 8:35 (LXX/Old Latin: 'the will is prepared by the Lord'); Ps 40:2 (39:3) (echo, 'rock').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.3 (CSEL 57:178; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-3).

## Letter 194.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-4
- Source: CSEL 57:178–179
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God is no respecter of persons when he freely saves some from a common mass of condemnation, since punishment is owed and grace is not.

### Latin text

Quod autem personarum acceptorem deum se credere existimant: si credant. quod sine ullis praecedentibus meritis. cuius uult miseretur et, quos dignatur, uocat et, quem uult. religiosum facit. parum adtendunt, quod debita reddatur poena damnato, indebita gratia liberato. ut nec ille se indignum queratur nec dignum se iste glorietur. atque ibi potius acceptionem nullam fieri personarum, ubi una eademque massa damnationis et offensionis inuoluit. ut liberatus de non liberato discat. quod etiam sibi supplicium conueniret, nisi gratia subueniret; si autem gratia, utique nullis meritis reddita sed gratuita bonitate donata.

### English translation (Claude)

And as to their thinking that they would believe God to be a respecter of persons if they believed that without any preceding merits he has mercy on whom he wills, calls whom he deigns, and makes devout whom he wills: they pay too little attention to the fact that the punishment owed is paid to the condemned and the grace not owed is given to the one set free, so that the former may not complain that he is unworthy, nor the latter boast that he is worthy; and that there is rather no respect of persons at all where one and the same mass of condemnation and offence involves all, so that the one set free may learn from the one not set free that punishment would have befitted him too, had grace not come to his aid; and if grace, then certainly not paid to any merits but given by free goodness.

### Scripture references

- Acts 10:34: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 10:34; Rom 9:15, 18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.4 (CSEL 57:178–179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-4).

## Letter 194.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-5
- Source: CSEL 57:179–180
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: If it is unjust to free one of two equally guilty, then justice would punish both; God's choice shows both justice and grace and is hidden in the depth of his wisdom.

### Latin text

Sed iniustum est°, inquiunt, in una eademque mala causa hunc liberari, illum puniri. nempe ergo iustum est utrumque puniri. quis hoc negauerit? agamus ergo etiam gratias saluatori, dum nobis non redditum cernimus, quod in damnatione similium etiam nobis debitum fuisse cognoscimus. si enim utrique liberarentur, lateret, quid peccato per iustitiam debeatur; si nemo, quid gratia largiretur. ut ergo in hac difficillima quaestione uerbis potius utamur apostoli. uolens deus. ostendere iram et demonstrare potentiam suam adtulit in multa patientia uasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem, et ut notas faceret diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae. cui non potest figmentum dicere: Quare sic me fecisti? cum habeat potestatem ex eadem massa facere aliud uas in honorem aliud in contumeliam, ubi quia uniuersa ista massa merito damnata est, contumeliam debitam reddit iustitia. honorem donat indebitum gratia non meriti praerogatiua, non fati necessitate. non temeritate fortunae sed altitudine diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei, quam non aperit, sed clausam miratur apostolus clamans: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei. quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! quis enim cognouit sensum domini? aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? aut quis prior dedit illi et retribuetur ei? quoniam ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia, ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum!

### English translation (Claude)

'But it is unjust', they say, 'that in one and the same evil case this one should be set free and that one punished.' Then of course it is just that both should be punished. Who would deny it? Let us therefore give thanks to the Saviour, when we see that what we recognize was owed to us too, in the condemnation of those like us, has not been paid to us. For if both were set free, what is owed to sin by justice would be hidden; if neither, what grace bestows. So, in this most difficult question, let us rather use the words of the apostle: 'God, wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction, and that he might make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy.' To him the thing formed cannot say, 'Why have you made me thus?', since he has power to make from the same lump one vessel for honour and another for dishonour. There, since that whole lump has been deservedly condemned, justice pays the dishonour owed, and grace gives the honour not owed, not by any privilege of merit, not by the necessity of fate, not by the rashness of fortune, but by the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God, which the apostle does not open but marvels at, closed as it is, crying out: 'O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and inscrutable his ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counsellor? Or who has first given to him, that it should be repaid him? For from him and through him and in him are all things; to him be glory for ever and ever!'

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:34: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:35: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:22–23, 20–21; Rom 11:33–36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.5 (CSEL 57:179–180; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-5).

## Letter 194.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-6
- Source: CSEL 57:180–181
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians want some merit to precede grace, but God's mercy and truth meet so that the saved have no merit before being freely justified, though the righteous then have merits.

### Latin text

Nolunt autem, ut sit ipsi gloria in iustificandis impiis gratuita gratia, qui eius ignorantes iustitiam suam uolunt constituere uel iam conclamantium religiosorum et piorum uocibus pressi ita se fatentur ad habendam seu faciendam iustitiam diuinitus adiuuari, ut sui praecedat aliquid meriti. quasi priores uolentes dare, ut retribuatur eis ab illo, de quo dictum est: Quis prior dedit illi et retribuetur ei? et sua putantes praeire merita ad illum, de quo audiunt aut potius audire nolunt: Quoniam ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia. quarum autem diuitiarum est altitudo sapientiae et scientiae eius, ex his sunt diuitiae gloriae eius in uasa misericordiae, quae uocat in adoptionem. quas diuitias notas uult facere etiam per uasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem. et quae sunt uiae inuestigabiles. nisi de quibus in psalmo canitur: Uniuersae uiae domini misericordia et ueritas? misericordia igitur et ueritas eius inuestigabiles sunt. quoniam, cuius uult. miseretur non iustitia sed misericordia gratiae et, quem uult, obdurat non iniquitate sed ueritate uindictae. quae tamen misericordia et ueritas ita sibi occurrunt, quia scriptum est: Misericordia et ueritas occurrerunt sibi, ut nec misericordia impediat ueritatem. qua plectitur dignus. nec ueritas misericordiam. qua liberatur indignus. quae igitur sua merita iactaturus est liberatus. cum, si digna suis meritis redderentur. non esset nisi damnatus? nullane igitur sunt merita iustorum? sunt plane, quia iusti sunt. sed ut iusti fierent, merita non fuerunt: iusti enim facti sunt, cum iustificati sunt sed, sicut dicit apostolus, iustificati gratis per gratiam ipsius.

### English translation (Claude)

But they do not want the glory to be his for justifying the ungodly by free grace, who, ignorant of his righteousness, wish to establish their own; or, pressed by the voices of devout and godly people crying out, confess that they are helped by God to have or to do righteousness in such a way that some merit of their own comes first, as though wishing to give first so that it may be repaid them by him of whom it is said, 'Who has first given to him, that it should be repaid him?', and thinking that their merits go before him of whom they hear, or rather refuse to hear, 'For from him and through him and in him are all things.' But from the riches of whose depth of wisdom and knowledge come the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy, which he calls into adoption; and these riches he wishes to make known also through the vessels of wrath, which are made for destruction. And what are the inscrutable ways, if not those of which the psalm sings, 'All the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth'? His mercy and truth, then, are inscrutable, since he has mercy on whom he wills, not by justice but by the mercy of grace, and hardens whom he wills, not by injustice but by the truth of retribution. Yet this mercy and truth so meet each other, for it is written, 'Mercy and truth have met each other', that neither does mercy hinder the truth by which the worthy is punished, nor does truth hinder the mercy by which the unworthy is set free. What merits of his own, then, will the one set free boast of, when, if what his merits deserved were paid him, he would be nothing but condemned? Are there, then, no merits of the righteous? There certainly are, because they are righteous. But there were no merits to make them righteous; for they were made righteous when they were justified, but, as the apostle says, 'justified freely by his grace'.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:35: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:36: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 25:10 (24:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 85:10 (84:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:3; Rom 11:35–36; Rom 9:23, 22; Ps 25:10 (24:10); Rom 9:18; Ps 85:10 (84:11); Rom 3:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.6 (CSEL 57:180–181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-6).

## Letter 194.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-7
- Source: CSEL 57:181–182
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Though Pelagius anathematized the view that grace is given by merit, his followers still teach it, contrary to Romans, which teaches that grace justifies the ungodly.

### Latin text

Cum igitur huic gratiae inimici infestique sint isti. Pelagius tamen in ecclesiastico iudicio Palaestino — non enim aliter inde inpunitus exisset — anathematizauit eos, qui dicunt gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari. sed nihil aliud in eorum etiam posterioribus disputationibus inuenitur quam meritis dari eam gratiam, de cuius commendatione maxime ad Romanos apostolica epistula loquitur. ut inde se praedicatio eius uelut a capite orbis toto orbe diffunderet: ea est enim, qua iustificatur impius, id est fit iustus, qui prius fuerat impius. et ideo percipiendae huius gratiae merita nulla praecedunt. quia meritis impii non gratia sed poena debetur nec ista esset gratia, si non daretur gratuita, sed debita redderetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Although these men are enemies and opponents of this grace, Pelagius nevertheless, at the church trial in Palestine (for he would not otherwise have come out of it unpunished), anathematized those who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits. But in their later arguments too nothing else is found than that grace is given for merits, the grace of whose commendation the apostolic letter speaks above all to the Romans, so that its proclamation might spread from there, as from the capital of the world, through the whole world. For it is the grace by which the ungodly is justified, that is, he who was ungodly before becomes righteous. And therefore no merits precede the receiving of this grace, because to the merits of the ungodly not grace but punishment is owed; nor would this be grace if it were not given freely but paid as owed.

### Scripture references

- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Synod of Diospolis (415); Rom 4:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.7 (CSEL 57:181–182; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-7).

## Letter 194.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-8
- Source: CSEL 57:182–183
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagians claim that the grace given without merit is human nature, but the grace Paul commends is that by which sinners are justified through Christ.

### Latin text

Sed cum ab istis quaeritur. quam gratiam Pelagius cogitaret sine ullis praecedentibus meritis dari. quando anathematizabat eos, qui dicunt gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari. respondent sine ullis praecedentibus meritis gratiam ipsam humanam esse naturam, in qua conditi sumus; neque enim. ante quam essemus, mereri aliquid potuimus, ut essemus. abiciatur a Christianorum cordibus ista fallacia. non, omnino non istam gratiam commendat apostolus, qua creati sumus, ut homines essemus. sed qua iustificati, cum mali homines essemus. ista est enim gratia per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. etenim Christus non pro nullis, ut homines conderentur. sed pro impiis mortuus est, ut iustificarentur: iam quippe homo erat, qui dicebat: Miser ego homo quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum.

### English translation (Claude)

But when they are asked what grace Pelagius thought is given without any preceding merits, when he anathematized those who say that God's grace is given according to our merits, they answer that the grace given without any preceding merits is human nature itself, in which we were created; for before we existed we could not merit anything in order to exist. Let this deceit be cast out of Christian hearts! No, the apostle certainly does not commend that grace by which we were created so as to be human beings, but that by which we were justified when we were evil human beings. For this is the grace through Jesus Christ our Lord. For Christ did not die for non-existent beings so that human beings might be created, but for the ungodly so that they might be justified. He who said, 'Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord', was already a human being.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:6; Rom 7:24–25 (in the Latin form 'the grace of God').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.8 (CSEL 57:182–183; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/191-1/#p-194-8).

## Letter 194.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-9
- Source: CSEL 57:183
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even forgiveness is obtained by faith, so faith itself, the beginning of all merit, must be God's free gift.

### Latin text

Possunt quidem dicere remissionem peccatorum esse gratiam. quae nullis praecedentibus meritis datur; quid enim habere possunt boni meriti peccatores? sed nec ipsa remissio peccatorum sine aliquo merito est. si fides hanc impetrat. neque enim nullum est meritum fidei. qua fide ille dicebat: Domine, propitius esto mihi peccatori et descendit iustificatus merito fidelis humilitatis, quoniam, qui se humiliat, exaltabitur. restat igitur, ut ipsam fidem, unde omnis iustitia sumit initium, propter quod dicitur ad ecclesiam in cantico canticorum: Venies et pertransies ab initio fidei, restat. inquam, ut ipsam fidem non humano, quod isti extollunt, tribuamus arbitrio nec ullis praecedentibus meritis, quoniam inde incipiunt bona, quaecumque sunt, merita. sed gratuitum dei donum esse fateamur. si gratiam ueram, id est sine meritis cogitemus, quia, sicut in eadem epistula legitur, deus unicuique partitur mensuram fidei. opera quippe bona fiunt ab homine. fides autem fit in homine, sine qua illa a nullo fiunt homine; omne enim, quod non est ex fide, peccatum est.

### English translation (Claude)

They can indeed say that the forgiveness of sins is a grace given without any preceding merits; for what good merit can sinners have? But not even the forgiveness of sins itself is without some merit, if faith obtains it. For the merit of faith is not nothing: by that faith the man said, 'Lord, be merciful to me a sinner', and went down justified by the merit of faithful humility, since 'whoever humbles himself will be exalted'. It remains, then, that faith itself, from which all righteousness takes its beginning (which is why it is said to the Church in the Song of Songs, 'You will come and pass through from the beginning of faith'), it remains, I say, that we attribute faith itself not to human choice, which these men extol, nor to any preceding merits, since from it begin whatever good merits there are, but confess it to be a free gift of God, if we think of true grace, that is, grace without merits. For, as we read in the same letter, 'God apportions to each the measure of faith.' Good works are done by a human being, but faith is produced in a human being, and without it those works are done by no one; for 'whatever is not from faith is sin'.

### Scripture references

- Luke 18:13: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 18:14: quotation, high confidence
- Song 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 14:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 18:13–14; Song 4:8 (Old Latin: 'from the beginning of faith'); Rom 12:3; Rom 14:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.9 (CSEL 57:183; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-9).

## Letter 194.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-10
- Source: CSEL 57:183–185
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith, which prays, is itself given before prayer; why one believes and another does not lies in God's unsearchable but just judgment.

### Latin text

Quapropter, ne se uel ipsius orationis meritum extollat. etiamsi ad uincendas temporalium rerum cupiditates et diligenda bona aeterna atque ipsum fontem omnium bonorum deum adiutorium datur oranti, fides orat. quae data est non oranti, quae utique nisi data esset, orare non posset. quo modo enim inuocabunt. in quem non crediderunt? aut quo modo credent, quem non audierunt? quo modo audient sine praedicante? igitur fides ex auditu, auditus autem per uerbum Christi. proinde minister Christi huius fidei praedicator secundum gratiam, quae data est illi. plantator est et rigator. nec tamen, qui plantat, est aliquid, neque qui rigat; sed qui incrementum dat deus, qui unicuique partitur mensuram fidei. unde et alibi dicitur: Pax fratribus et caritas cum fide, quam ne sibi tribuerent, continuo subiunxit: A deo patre et domino Iesu Christo, quia nec omnium est fides, qui audiunt uerbum, sed quibus deus partitur mensuram fidei, sicut nec omnia germinant. quae plantantur et rigantur, sed quibus deus dat incrementum. cur autem ille credat. ille non credat. cum ambo idem audiant et. si miraculum in eorum conspectu fiat, ambo idem uideant. altitudo est diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae eius, cuius inscrutabilia sunt iudicia et apud quem non est iniquitas. dum, cuius uult, miseretur et, quem uult, obdurat; neque enim propterea sunt ista iniusta. quia occulta.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, lest even the merit of prayer itself should exalt itself, although help is given to one who prays to overcome desires for temporal things and to love eternal goods and God himself, the fount of all goods, it is faith that prays, which was given to one who was not praying; and unless it had been given, he could not pray. 'For how will they call on him in whom they have not believed? Or how will they believe him whom they have not heard? How will they hear without a preacher? So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.' Accordingly, the minister of Christ, the preacher of this faith, according to the grace given him, plants and waters; 'yet neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth', who apportions to each the measure of faith. Hence it is said elsewhere, 'Peace to the brothers, and love with faith', and lest they attribute it to themselves, he added at once, 'from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ'; since faith does not belong to all who hear the word, but to those to whom God apportions the measure of faith, just as not all that are planted and watered sprout, but those to which God gives growth. But why one believes and another does not, when both hear the same thing, and, if a miracle is done before their eyes, both see the same thing, is the depth of the riches of his wisdom and knowledge, whose judgments are unsearchable, and with whom there is no injustice, while he has mercy on whom he wills and hardens whom he wills; for these things are not unjust because they are hidden.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:14: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:14, 17; 1 Cor 3:7; Rom 12:3; Eph 6:23; Rom 11:33; Rom 9:14, 18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.10 (CSEL 57:183–185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-10).

## Letter 194.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-11
- Source: CSEL 57:185
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: After forgiveness the Holy Spirit must dwell in the soul and pour in love; Christian faith works through love, unlike the faith of demons.

### Latin text

Deinde post remissionem peccatorum, nisi mundatam domum habitet spiritus sanctus, nonne cum aliis septem redit inmundus spiritus et erunt nouissima hominis illius peiora. quam erant prima? ut autem habitet spiritus sanctus, nonne. ubi uult. spirat et caritas dei, sine qua nemo bene uiuit, diffunditur in cordibus nostris non a nobis sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis? hanc enim fidem apostolus definiuit dicens: Neque circumcisio est aliquid neque praeputium sed fides, quae per dilectionem operatur. ista quippe fides est Christianorum non daemoniorum. nam et daemones credunt et contremescunt, sed numquid et diligunt? nam si non crederent, non dicerent: Tu es sanctus dei uel: Tu es filius dei: si autem diligerent, non dicerent: Quid nobis et tibi?

### English translation (Claude)

Then, after the forgiveness of sins, unless the Holy Spirit dwells in the cleansed house, does not the unclean spirit return with seven others, and the last state of that man become worse than the first? And for the Holy Spirit to dwell there, does he not breathe where he wills, and is not the love of God, without which no one lives well, poured into our hearts, not by ourselves, but through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us? For the apostle defined this faith, saying: 'Neither circumcision is anything nor uncircumcision, but faith working through love.' This is the faith of Christians, not of demons. For the demons also believe and tremble, but do they also love? For if they did not believe, they would not say, 'You are the Holy One of God', or, 'You are the Son of God'; but if they loved, they would not say, 'What have we to do with you?'

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:45: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 2:19: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 8:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 12:43–45; John 3:8; Rom 5:5; Gal 5:6; Jas 2:19; Mark 1:24; Matt 8:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.11 (CSEL 57:185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-11).

## Letter 194.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-12
- Source: CSEL 57:185–186
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith that draws people to Christ is the Father's gift, as John 6 shows, given also by the Son and Spirit, since the Trinity's works are inseparable.

### Latin text

Fides igitur ad Christum nos trahit, quae nisi desuper gratuito munere nobis daretur. non ipse diceret: Nemo potest uenire ad me. nisi pater, qui misit me. traxerit eum. unde et paulo post ait: Verba, quae ego locutus sum uobis, spiritus et uita sunt. sed sunt quidam ex uobis. qui non credunt: deinde euangelista subiungit: Sciebat enim ab initio Iesus, qui essent credentes et quis esset traditurus eum. et ne quisquam existimaret credentes sic ad eius praescientiam pertinere quo modo non credentes, id est ut non eis fides ipsa desuper daretur, sed tantum eorum uoluntas futura praenosceretur: mox adiecit atque ait: Et dicebat: Propterea dixi uobis. quia nemo potest uenire ad me, nisi fuerit ei datum a patre meo hinc erat, quod eorum, qui audierant loquentem de carne sua et sanguine suo, quidam scandalizati abscesserunt, quidam credendo manserunt, quia nemo posset uenire ad illum, nisi cui datum esset a patre ac per hoc et ab ipso filio et ab spiritu sancto. neque enim separata sunt dona uel opera inseparabilis trinitatis; sed filius sic honorans patrem non adfert ullius distantiae documentum, sed magnum praebet humilitatis exemplum.

### English translation (Claude)

It is faith, then, that draws us to Christ; and unless it were given us from above as a free gift, he himself would not say, 'No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.' Hence a little later he says: 'The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But there are some of you who do not believe.' Then the evangelist adds: 'For Jesus knew from the beginning who were those who believed and who it was that would betray him.' And lest anyone think that believers belonged to his foreknowledge in the same way as unbelievers, that is, that faith itself was not given them from above, but only their future will was foreknown, he went on to add: 'And he said: This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is given him by my Father.' This was why, of those who had heard him speak of his flesh and blood, some were scandalized and went away, while some stayed by believing: because no one could come to him except one to whom it was given by the Father, and therefore also by the Son himself and by the Holy Spirit. For the gifts or works of the inseparable Trinity are not separated; but the Son, in honouring the Father thus, does not offer proof of any distance between them, but gives a great example of humility.

### Scripture references

- John 6:44: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:63: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:64: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:65: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:66: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 6:44, 63–66.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.12 (CSEL 57:185–186; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-12).

## Letter 194.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-13
- Source: CSEL 57:186–187
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The defenders of free choice repeat the objection Paul answered in Rom 9: why does God still find fault?

### Latin text

Hic iterum isti liberi arbitrii defensores. immo deceptores quia inflatores et inflatores quia praesumptores non aduersus nos sed aduersus euangelium locuturi quid aliud dicent quam id, quod apostolus sibi, quasi a talibus diceretur. obiecit? Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? hanc contradictionem sibimet ipsi tamquam ab altero opposuit uelut ex eorum uoce. qui nolunt accipere, quod superius dixerat: Ergo, cuius uult, miseretur et, quem uult, obdurat. talibus itaque cum apostolo dicamus — non enim melius illo inuenire possumus, quid dicamus: o homo. tu quis es. qui respondeas deo?

### English translation (Claude)

Here again these defenders of free choice, or rather deceivers, because inflaters, and inflaters, because presumers, speaking not against us but against the Gospel, what else will they say than what the apostle put to himself as if it were said by such people? 'You will say to me then, Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?' He put this objection to himself as if from another, as from the voice of those who will not accept what he had said above: 'So then he has mercy on whom he wills, and he hardens whom he wills.' To such people, then, let us say with the apostle (for we cannot find anything better to say than he did): 'O man, who are you to answer back to God?'

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:19, 18, 20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.13 (CSEL 57:186–187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-13).

## Letter 194.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-14
- Source: CSEL 57:187
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hardening has its merit in sin, as God simply withholds mercy, but mercy has no merit, or it would not be grace.

### Latin text

Quaerimus enim meritum obdurationis et inuenimus. merito namque peccati uniuersa massa damnata est nec obdurat deus impertiendo malitiam sed non impertiendo misericordiam. quibus enim non impertitur. nec digni sunt nec merentur ac potius, ut non impertiatur, hoc digni sunt hoc merentur. quaerimus autem meritum misericordiae nec inuenimus. quia nullum est. ne gratia euacuetur. si non gratis donatur, sed meritis redditur.

### English translation (Claude)

For we look for the merit of hardening and we find it. For by the merit of sin the whole mass has been condemned, and God hardens not by imparting malice but by not imparting mercy. For those to whom it is not imparted are neither worthy of it nor merit it; rather, that it should not be imparted, this they are worthy of, this they merit. But we look for the merit of mercy and do not find it, because there is none, lest grace be made void, if it is not given freely but paid to merits.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.14 (CSEL 57:187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-14).

## Letter 194.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-15
- Source: CSEL 57:187–188
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith cannot merit grace, since faith itself is received, like the gifts of the Spirit listed by Isaiah and Paul, by God's mercy.

### Latin text

Si enim dixerimus fidem praecessisse. in qua esset meritum gratiae, quid meriti habebat homo ante fidem, ut acciperet fidem? quid enim habet, quod non accepit? si autem accepit. quid gloriatur. quasi non acceperit? sicut enim non haberet homo sapientiam, intellectum, consilium, fortitudinem, scientiam, pietatem, timorem dei, nisi secundum propheticum eloquium accepisset spiritum sapientiae et intellectus. consilii et fortitudinis. scientiae et pietatis et timoris dei, sicut non haberet uirtutem, caritatem. continentiam, nisi accepto spiritu, de quo dicit apostolus: Non enim accepimus spiritum timoris sed uirtutis et caritatis et continentiae, ita non haberet fidem, nisi accepisset spiritum fidei, de quo idem ipse dicit: Habentes autem eundem spiritum fidei. secundum quod scriptum est: ‛Credidi, propter quod et locutus sum, et nos credimus, propter quod et loquimur. non autem merito accipi sed misericordia eius. qui. cuius uult. miseretur, manifestissime ostendit. ubi de se ipso ait: Misericordiam consecutus sum. ut fidelis essem.

### English translation (Claude)

For if we say that faith came first, and that in it lay the merit of grace, what merit did a human being have before faith, so as to receive faith? 'For what does he have that he did not receive? And if he received it, why does he boast as if he had not received it?' For just as a human being would not have wisdom, understanding, counsel, strength, knowledge, piety and the fear of God unless, according to the prophetic word, he had received the spirit of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and strength, of knowledge and piety and the fear of God; just as he would not have power, love and self-control unless he had received the Spirit of whom the apostle says, 'For we have not received a spirit of fear but of power and love and self-control'; so he would not have faith unless he had received the spirit of faith, of whom the same apostle says: 'Having the same spirit of faith, according to what is written, I believed, therefore I spoke, we too believe, and therefore we speak.' And that it is received not by merit but by the mercy of him who has mercy on whom he wills, he shows most plainly where he says of himself: 'I obtained mercy to be faithful.'

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 11:2: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 116:10 (115:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:25: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 4:7; Isa 11:2–3 (LXX/Vulg. list with 'piety'); 2 Tim 1:7; 2 Cor 4:13 (Ps 116:10, 115:10 LXX/Vulg.); 1 Cor 7:25.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.15 (CSEL 57:187–188; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-15).

## Letter 194.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-16
- Source: CSEL 57:188–189
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prayer cannot merit grace, since prayer itself is a gift: the Spirit 'intercedes' by making us pray.

### Latin text

Si dixerimus meritum praecedere orationis, ut donum gratiae consequatur. impetrando quidem oratio. quicquid impetrat, euidenter ostendit donum dei esse. ne homo existimet a se ipso sibi esse, quod si in potestate haberetur, non utique posceretur. uerum tamen ne saltem orationis putentur praecedere merita, quibus non gratuita daretur gratia — sed iam nec gratia esset, quia debita redderetur —, etiam ipsa oratio inter gratiae munera reperitur. quid enim oremus, ait doctor gentium, sicut oportet, nescimus; sed ipse spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus. quid est autem interpellat nisi interpellare nos facit? indigentis enim certissimum indicium est interpellare gemitibus. nullius autem rei esse indigentem fas est credere spiritum sanctum. sed ita dictum est ‛interpellat’, quia interpellare nos efficit nobisque interpellandi et gemendi inspirat affectum, sicut illud in euangelio: Non enim uos estis. qui loquimini. sed spiritus patris uestri, qui loquitur in nobis. neque enim et hoc ita fit de nobis tamquam nihil facientibus nobis. adiutorium igitur spiritus sancti sic expressum est. ut ipse facere diceretur. quod ut faciamus. facit.

### English translation (Claude)

If we say that the merit of prayer comes first, so that the gift of grace follows, prayer, by obtaining whatever it obtains, clearly shows that it is a gift of God, lest a human being think he has it from himself; for if it were in his power, it would certainly not be asked for. Yet lest even the merits of prayer be thought to come first, so that grace would not be given freely (and then it would no longer be grace, since it would be paid as owed), prayer itself too is found among the gifts of grace. 'For we do not know what to pray for as we ought', says the teacher of the Gentiles, 'but the Spirit himself intercedes with unutterable groanings.' But what is 'intercedes' except 'makes us intercede'? For to intercede with groanings is a most certain sign of one in need; but it is not lawful to believe the Holy Spirit to be in need of anything. It was said 'intercedes' because he makes us intercede and inspires in us the disposition to intercede and groan, like that saying in the Gospel: 'For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.' For this too does not happen with us as if we were doing nothing. The help of the Holy Spirit, then, is so expressed that he is said to do what he makes us do.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:26; Matt 10:20. The digital text reads 'in nobis' ('in us') in the Gospel quotation; translated 'in you' following Matt 10:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.16 (CSEL 57:188–189; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-16).

## Letter 194.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-17
- Source: CSEL 57:189
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul means the Holy Spirit, who helps our weakness and is said to cry out because he makes us cry 'Abba, Father'.

### Latin text

Nam non esse intellegendum spiritum nostrum, de quo dictum est: Interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus, sed spiritum sanctum, quo nostra infirmitas adiuuatur, satis ipse demonstrat apostolus. inde enim coepit: Spiritus, inquit. adiuuat infirmitatem nostram; deinde ista subiunxit: Quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus, et cetera. de hoc quippe spiritu apertius alibi dicit: Non enim accepistis spiritum seruitutis iterum in timore. sed accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba pater. ecce hic non dixit, quod ipse spiritus clamet orando, sed in quo clamamus, inquit, abba pater. alio tamen loco ait: Quoniam filii estis, misit deus spiritum filii sui in corda uestra clamantem: Abba pater. non hic ait in quo clamamus. sed ipsum spiritum clamantem dicere maluit, quo efficitur, ut clamemus, sicut sunt illa: Ipse spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus et: Spiritus patris uestri est, qui loquitur in uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

For the apostle himself shows clearly enough that we are not to understand our own spirit as the one of whom it was said, 'He intercedes with unutterable groanings', but the Holy Spirit, by whom our weakness is helped. For he began thus: 'The Spirit helps our weakness'; then he added, 'For we do not know what to pray for as we ought', and so on. Of this Spirit he speaks more plainly elsewhere: 'For you did not receive the spirit of slavery again in fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption as sons, in whom we cry, Abba, Father.' See, here he did not say that the Spirit himself cries out in praying, but 'in whom we cry', he says, 'Abba, Father.' Yet in another place he says: 'Because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.' Here he did not say 'in whom we cry', but preferred to say that the Spirit himself cries, by whom it is brought about that we cry; like those sayings, 'The Spirit himself intercedes with unutterable groanings', and, 'It is the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:26: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 8:15: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 8:26, 15; Gal 4:6; Matt 10:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.17 (CSEL 57:189; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-17).

## Letter 194.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-18
- Source: CSEL 57:189–190
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Faith and prayer, like all virtues, come from the one Holy Spirit, who helps unbelievers to believe and dwells in believers to help them further.

### Latin text

Sicut ergo nemo recte sapit, recte intellegit, recte consilio ac fortitudine praeualet, nemo scienter pius est uel pie sciens, nemo timore casto deum timet, nisi acceperit spiritum sapientiae et intellectus, consilii et fortitudinis, scientiae et pietatis et timoris dei, nec habet quisquam uirtutem ueram, caritatem sinceram, continentiam religiosam nisi per spiritum uirtutis et caritatis et continentiae. ita sine spiritu fidei non est recte quispiam crediturus nec sine spiritu orationis salubriter oraturus, non quia tot sunt spiritus. sed omnia haec operatur unus atque idem spiritus diuidens propria unicuique, prout uult, quia spiritus, ubi uult, spirat. sed, quod fatendum est. aliter adiuuat nondum inhabitans aliter inhabitans; nam nondum inhabitans adiuuat. ut sint fideles, inhabitans adiuuat iam fideles.

### English translation (Claude)

Just as, then, no one is rightly wise, rightly understands, rightly prevails in counsel and strength, no one is knowingly pious or piously knowing, no one fears God with chaste fear, unless he has received the spirit of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and strength, of knowledge and piety and the fear of God; and no one has true power, sincere love, devout self-control except through the Spirit of power and love and self-control; so without the spirit of faith no one will rightly believe, and without the spirit of prayer no one will pray healthfully. Not because there are so many spirits, but 'all these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each individually as he wills', since 'the Spirit breathes where he wills'. But, it must be admitted, he helps in one way when not yet dwelling in us, and in another when dwelling in us: for when not yet dwelling in us he helps people to become believers; when dwelling in us he helps those who are already believers.

### Scripture references

- Isa 11:2: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 1:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:11: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Isa 11:2–3; Ps 19:9 (18:10) ('chaste fear'); 2 Tim 1:7; 1 Cor 12:11; John 3:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.18 (CSEL 57:189–190; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-18).

## Letter 194.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-19
- Source: CSEL 57:190–191
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: When God crowns our merits he crowns his own gifts; even eternal life, given for merits, is grace because the merits themselves were given.

### Latin text

Quod est ergo meritum hominis ante gratiam, quo merito percipiat gratiam, cum omne bonum meritum nostrum non in nobis faciat nisi gratia et, cum deus coronat merita nostra, nihil aliud coronet quam munera sua? sicut enim ab initio fidei misericordiam consecuti sumus. non quia fideles eramus, sed ut essemus, sic in fine, quod erit uita aeterna, coronabit nos. sicut scriptum est, in miseratione et misericordia. non itaque frustra deo cantatur et: Misericordia eius praeueniet me et: Misericordia eius subsequetur me. unde et ipsa aeterna uita, quae utique in fine sine fine habebitur et ideo meritis praecedentibus redditur, tamen, quia eadem merita. quibus redditur, non a nobis facta sunt per nostram sufficientiam, sed in nobis facta per gratiam, etiam ipsa gratia nuncupatur non ob aliud, nisi quia gratis datur, nec ideo. quia non meritis datur. sed quia data sunt et ipsa merita, quibus datur. ubi autem inuenimus etiam uitam aeternam gratiam nuncupari. habemus apud eundem gratiae magnificum defensorem apostolum Paulum: Stipendium. inquit, peccati mors: gratia autem dei uita aeterna in Christo Iesu domino nostro.

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, is the merit of a human being before grace, by which merit he receives grace, since only grace produces every good merit of ours in us, and when God crowns our merits, he crowns nothing but his own gifts? For just as at the beginning of faith we obtained mercy, not because we were believers, but so that we might be, so at the end, which will be eternal life, he will crown us, as it is written, with compassion and mercy. Not in vain, then, is it sung to God, 'His mercy will go before me', and, 'His mercy will follow me.' Hence eternal life itself too, which will certainly be possessed at the end without end and is therefore paid to preceding merits, is nevertheless also called grace, because those same merits to which it is paid were not produced by us through our own sufficiency but produced in us through grace; called grace for no other reason than that it is given freely, not because it is not given to merits, but because even the merits to which it is given were themselves given. And where do we find eternal life too called grace? We have it in the same magnificent defender of grace, the apostle Paul: 'The wages of sin', he says, 'is death; but the grace of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.'

### Scripture references

- Ps 103:4 (102:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 59:10 (58:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 23:6 (22:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 6:23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 103:4 (102:4); Ps 59:10 (58:11); Ps 23:6 (22:6); 2 Cor 3:5; Rom 6:23. 'When God crowns our merits, he crowns his own gifts' became a classic formula.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.19 (CSEL 57:190–191; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-19).

## Letter 194.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-20
- Source: CSEL 57:191
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: One would expect Paul to call eternal life the wages of righteousness or faith, which would also be true.

### Latin text

Vide, obsecro te. in quanta breuitate quam uigilanter uerba posuerit. quibus diligenter consideratis quaestionis huius aliquantum dilucescat obscuritas. cum enim dixisset: Stipendium peccati mors, quis non eum congruentissime et consequenter addere iudicaret. si diceret: Stipendium autem iustitiae uita aeterna? et uerum est, quia sicut merito peccati tamquam stipendium redditur mors ita merito iustitiae tamquam stipendium uita aeterna. aut si nollet dicere iustitiae. at diceret fidei, quoniam iustus ex fide uiuit. unde etiam et merces appellatur plurimis sanctarum scripturarum locis: numquam porro dicta est merces iustitia uel fides, quia iustitiae uel fidei redditur merces. quod est autem merces operanti, hoc militanti stipendium.

### English translation (Claude)

See, I beg you, with what brevity and how vigilantly he placed his words; when these are carefully considered, the obscurity of this question becomes somewhat clearer. For when he had said, 'The wages of sin is death', who would not judge that he would add most fittingly and consistently if he said, 'But the wages of righteousness is eternal life'? And it is true; for just as death is paid as wages to the merit of sin, so eternal life as wages to the merit of righteousness. Or if he did not wish to say 'of righteousness', he might at least have said 'of faith', since 'the righteous live by faith'. Hence it is also called a reward in very many places of the holy Scriptures; but righteousness or faith is never called a reward, because a reward is paid to righteousness or faith. And what a reward is to one who works, wages are to one who serves as a soldier.

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:23: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 6:23; Hab 2:4 / Rom 1:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.20 (CSEL 57:191; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-20).

## Letter 194.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-21
- Source: CSEL 57:191–193
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul calls eternal life 'the grace of God' rather than wages of righteousness to exclude pride, since righteousness itself is received; we receive 'grace for grace'.

### Latin text

Sed beatus apostolus aduersus elationem, quae usque adeo magnis temptat inrepere, ut et sibi propter ipsam dicat datum angelum Satanae, a quo colaphizaretur, ne uerticem praesumptionis erigeret, aduersus hanc ergo elationis pestem uigilantissime militans: Stipendium, inquit, peccati mors: recte stipendium, quia debetur, quia digne retribuitur, quia merito redditur. deinde, ne iustitia de humano se extolleret bono merito. sicut humanum meritum malum non dubitatur esse peccatum, non a contrario rettulit dicens: Stipendium iustitiae uita aeterna, sed: Gratia, inquit, dei uita aeterna. et haec ne praeter mediatorem aliqua alia uia quaereretur, adiecit: In Christo Iesu domino nostro, tamquam diceret: Audito, quod stipendium peccati sit mors. quid te disponis extollere, o humana non iustitia sed nomine iustitiae plane superbia? quid te disponis extollere et contrariam morti uitam aeternam tamquam debitum stipendium flagitare? cui debetur uita aeterna, uera iustitia est; si autem uera iustitia est. ex te non est, desursum est descendens a patre luminum. ut haberes eam, si tamen habes eam, profecto accepisti; quid enim boni habes, quod non accepisti? quapropter, o homo, si accepturus es uitam aeternam, iustitiae quidem stipendium est, sed tibi gratia est. cui gratia est et ipsa iustitia. tibi enim tamquam debita redderetur, si ex te tibi esset iustitia, cui debetur. nunc uero de plenitudine eius accepimus non solum gratiam. qua nunc iuste in laboribus usque in finem uiuimus. sed etiam gratiam pro hac gratia. ut in requie postea sine fine uiuamus. hoc nihil salubrius fides credit. quia nihil uerius intellectus inuenit, et. debemus audire prophetam dicentem: Nisi credideritis, non intellegetis.

### English translation (Claude)

But the blessed apostle, fighting most vigilantly against pride, which tries to creep even into great men, so that he says that for this reason an angel of Satan was given him to buffet him, lest he raise his head in presumption, fighting, then, against this plague of pride, says, 'The wages of sin is death': rightly 'wages', because it is owed, because it is fittingly repaid, because it is deservedly paid. Then, lest righteousness exalt itself on the basis of good human merit, as evil human merit is undoubtedly sin, he did not say by contrast, 'The wages of righteousness is eternal life', but, 'The grace of God', he says, 'is eternal life.' And lest some other way than the mediator be sought for it, he added, 'in Christ Jesus our Lord', as if to say: Having heard that the wages of sin is death, why are you preparing to exalt yourself, O human pride, not righteousness but plainly pride in the name of righteousness? Why are you preparing to exalt yourself and demand eternal life, the opposite of death, as wages owed? True righteousness is that to which eternal life is owed; but if it is true righteousness, it is not from you; it is from above, coming down from the Father of lights. To have it, if indeed you have it, you certainly received it; for what good do you have that you did not receive? Therefore, O man, if you are going to receive eternal life, it is indeed the wages of righteousness, but for you it is grace, for whom righteousness itself is grace. For it would be paid to you as owed if the righteousness to which it is owed came to you from yourself. But as it is, 'from his fullness we have received' not only the grace by which we now live righteously amid labours until the end, but also 'grace for this grace', so that afterwards we may live in rest without end. Faith believes nothing more healthful than this, because understanding finds nothing truer; and we must listen to the prophet saying, 'Unless you believe, you will not understand.'

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 12:7: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:23: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:16: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 7:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 12:7; Rom 6:23; Jas 1:17; 1 Cor 4:7; John 1:16; Isa 7:9 (LXX/Old Latin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.21 (CSEL 57:191–193; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-21).

## Letter 194.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-22
- Source: CSEL 57:193
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who live badly cannot excuse themselves for lack of grace, since their evil is their own; the vessels of mercy should glorify God, not themselves.

### Latin text

Sed excusabunt se. inquit. homines, qui nolunt recte fideliter uiuere, dicentes: Quid nos fecimus, qui male uiuimus. quando quidem gratiam, unde bene uiueremus, non accepimus? non possunt ueraciter dicere nihil se mali facere, quia male uiuunt: si enim nihil mali faciunt. bene uiuunt: si autem male uiuunt. de suo male uiuunt. uel quod originaliter traxerunt uel quod insuper addiderunt. sed si uasa sunt irae, quae perfecta sunt ad perditionem. quae illis debita redditur, sibi hoc inputent, quia ex ea massa facta sunt, quam propter unius peccatum, in quo omnes peccauerunt. merito deus iusteque damnauit; si autem uasa sunt misericordiae. quibus ex eadem massa factis supplicium debitum reddere noluit. non se inflent, sed ipsum glorificent. qui eis misericordiam non debitam praestitit et, si quid aliter sapiunt, hoc quoque illis ipse reuelabit.

### English translation (Claude)

'But', someone says, 'people who do not want to live rightly and faithfully will excuse themselves, saying: What have we done, we who live badly, since we have not received the grace by which we might live well?' They cannot truthfully say that they do nothing evil, since they live badly; for if they do nothing evil, they live well; but if they live badly, they live badly from what is their own, either what they drew from their origin or what they added besides. But if they are vessels of wrath, made for the destruction that is paid them as owed, let them impute it to themselves, because they have been made from that mass which God deservedly and justly condemned because of the sin of one, in whom all sinned. But if they are vessels of mercy, to whom, though made from the same mass, he did not will to pay the punishment owed, let them not be puffed up, but glorify him who showed them mercy not owed; and if they think otherwise in anything, he will reveal this too to them.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:22–23; Rom 5:12; Phil 3:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.22 (CSEL 57:193; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-22).

## Letter 194.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-23
- Source: CSEL 57:193–195
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To those who blame God's will for their hardness, Augustine repeats Paul's answer; it suffices to believe that God frees by mercy and condemns by justice, his reasons being unsearchable.

### Latin text

Postremo quonam se isti excusabunt modo? nempe illo, quem breuiter tamquam ex eorum uoce sibi obiecit apostolus. ut dicant: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? hoc est enim dicere: Quid de nobis fit querela, quod deum offendamus male uiuendo. cum illius uoluntati nemo possit resistere. qui nos obdurauit misericordiam non praestando? si ergo illos non pudet hac excusatione non nobis sed apostolo contra dicere, cur nos pigeat eis, quod dixit apostolus, hoc idem atque identidem dicere: o homo. tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? numquid dicit figmentum ei, qui se finxit: Quare sic me fecisti? annon habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa. utique merito recteque damnata facere aliud uas in honorem indebitum propter misericordiae gratiam, aliud in contumeliam debitam propter irae iustitiam et ut notas faciat diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae sic ostendens, quid eis largiatur, cum id supplicium recipient uasa irae, quod pariter omnibus debebatur? satis sit interim Christiano ex fide adhuc uiuenti et nondum cernenti, quod perfectum est, sed ex parte scienti nosse uel credere. quod neminem deus liberet nisi gratuita misericordia per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum et neminem damnet nisi aequissima ueritate per eundem dominum nostrum Iesum Christum. cur autem illum potius quam illum liberet aut non liberet, scrutetur, qui potest, iudiciorum eius tam magnum profundum. uerum tamen caueat praecipitium. numquid enim iniquitas apud deum? absit! sed inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, how will they excuse themselves? Surely in the way that the apostle briefly objected to himself as if in their voice, so that they say: 'Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?' That is to say: Why is there a complaint about us that we offend God by living badly, when no one can resist the will of him who hardened us by not showing mercy? If, then, they are not ashamed to contradict, with this excuse, not us but the apostle, why should we be reluctant to say to them again and again exactly what the apostle said: 'O man, who are you to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to the one who formed it, Why have you made me thus? Has the potter no power over the clay, from the same lump', certainly deservedly and rightly condemned, 'to make one vessel for honour', not owed, because of the grace of mercy, 'and another for dishonour', owed, because of the justice of wrath, 'and to make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy', thus showing what he bestows on them, when the vessels of wrath receive the punishment that was owed equally to all? Let it be enough meanwhile for a Christian, still living by faith and not yet seeing what is perfect but knowing in part, to know or believe that God sets no one free except by free mercy through our Lord Jesus Christ, and condemns no one except by most equitable truth through the same our Lord Jesus Christ. But why he sets free or does not set free this one rather than that, let him search out who can so great a depth of his judgments; yet let him beware of the precipice. 'For is there injustice with God? By no means!' But 'his judgments are unsearchable and his ways inscrutable'.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:7: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:9: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:19–23; 2 Cor 5:7; 1 Cor 13:9–10; Rom 9:14; Rom 11:33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.23 (CSEL 57:193–195; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-23).

## Letter 194.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-24
- Source: CSEL 57:195
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Adults who know the truth and still disobey deserve heavier condemnation and are, as Paul says, without excuse.

### Latin text

Et in maioribus dum taxat aetatibus merito dici potest: Hi noluerunt intellegere, ut bene agerent: hi, quod est grauius, intellexerunt et non oboedierunt, quia, sicut scriptum est. uerbis non emendabitur seruus durus; si enim et intellexerit, non oboediet. unde non oboediet nisi sua pessima uoluntate? cui grauior damnatio diuina aequitate debetur: cui enim plus datur, plus exigetur ab eo. istos quippe scriptura inexcusabiles dicit, quos non latet ueritas et in eis perseuerat iniquitas. reuelatur enim ira dei de caelo, ait apostolus, super omnem impietatem et iniustitiam hominum eorum, qui ueritatem in iniquitate detinent, quia, quod notum est dei, manifestum est in illis: deus enim illis manifestauit. inuisibilia enim eius a creatura mundi per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur sempiterna quoque uirtus eius ac diuinitas, ut sint inexcusabiles.

### English translation (Claude)

And at least in older ages it can rightly be said: These did not wish to understand so as to act well; these, which is worse, understood and did not obey; for, as it is written, 'A hard servant will not be corrected by words; for even if he understands, he will not obey.' Why will he not obey, except by his own most evil will? To him a heavier condemnation is owed by divine equity; for to whom more is given, more will be required of him. For Scripture calls those inexcusable from whom the truth is not hidden and in whom iniquity persists. 'For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven', says the apostle, 'against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of those men who hold down the truth in unrighteousness, because what is known of God is manifest in them; for God has manifested it to them. For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, understood through the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity, so that they are without excuse.'

### Scripture references

- Prov 29:19: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 12:48: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 29:19; Luke 12:48; Rom 1:18–20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.24 (CSEL 57:195; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-24).

## Letter 194.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-25
- Source: CSEL 57:195–196
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those instructed by the law who judge others while doing the same are even more inexcusable than the pagans who knew God from creation.

### Latin text

Si ergo istos inexcusabiles dicit, qui inuisibilia eius per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspicere potuerunt nec oboedierunt tamen ueritati, sed iniqui et impii permanserunt — neque enim non cognouerunt, sed cognoscentes, inquit. deum non ut deum glorificauerunt aut gratias egerunt —. quanto magis inexcusabiles sunt, qui ex lege eius instructi confidunt se ipsos duces esse caecorum et alios docentes se ipsos non docent, qui praedicant non furandum et furantur et cetera. quae de ipsis apostolus loquitur! eis quippe dicit: Propterea inexcusabilis es o homo omnis, qui iudicas; in quo enim alium iudicas. temet ipsum condemnas; eadem enim agis. quae iudicas.

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, he calls those inexcusable who could clearly see his invisible things understood through the things that are made, and yet did not obey the truth but remained unrighteous and ungodly (for they did not fail to know, but, 'knowing God', he says, 'they did not glorify him as God or give thanks'), how much more inexcusable are those who, instructed by his law, are confident that they are guides of the blind, and, teaching others, do not teach themselves, who preach that one must not steal and steal, and the other things the apostle says of them! For to them he says: 'Therefore you are without excuse, O man, everyone who judges; for in judging another you condemn yourself; for you do the same things that you judge.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:21: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:19: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 1:21; Rom 2:19–21; Rom 2:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.25 (CSEL 57:195–196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-25).

## Letter 194.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-26
- Source: CSEL 57:196
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christ said that those who heard him had no excuse, since pride thinks itself excused only when it sins from ignorance.

### Latin text

Dicit etiam ipse dominus in euangelio: Si non uenissem et locutus fuissem eis, peccatum non haberent: nunc autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo. non utique peccatum nullum haberent, qui pleni erant aliis magnis multisque peccatis: sed hoc peccatum uult intellegi non eos habituros fuisse, si non uenisset. quo. cum audissent eum. non crediderunt in eum, hanc eos excusationem non habere adserens, qua possent dicere: Non audiuimus. ideo non credidimus. humana quippe superbia tamquam praesumens de uiribus liberi arbitrii excusatam se putat, quando ignorantiae non uoluntatis uidetur esse, quod peccat.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord himself also says in the Gospel: 'If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin.' They would certainly not have had no sin at all, since they were full of other great and many sins; but he means to be understood that they would not have had this sin if he had not come, namely that, having heard him, they did not believe in him, asserting that they do not have the excuse by which they could say, 'We did not hear, therefore we did not believe.' For human pride, as if presuming on the powers of free choice, thinks itself excused when its sinning seems to be a matter of ignorance rather than of will.

### Scripture references

- John 15:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 15:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.26 (CSEL 57:196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-26).

## Letter 194.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-27
- Source: CSEL 57:196–197
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Even those who never heard the law are inexcusable through original sin; ignorance is either sin or the punishment of sin.

### Latin text

Secundum hanc excusationem inexcusabiles dicit scriptura diuina. quoscumque scientes peccare conuincit. dei tamen iustum iudicium nec illis parcit. qui non audierunt; quicumque enim sine lege peccauerunt, sine lege peribunt. et quamuis se ipsi excusare uideantur. non admittit hanc excusationem, qui scit se fecisse hominem rectum eique oboedientiae dedisse praeceptum nec nisi eius, quo male usus est. libero uoluntatis arbitrio, etiam quod transiret in posteros. manasse peccatum. neque enim damnantur, qui non peccauerunt, quando quidem illud ex uno in omnes pertransiit, in quo ante propria in singulis quibusque peccata omnes communiter peccauerunt. ac per hoc inexcusabilis est omnis peccator uel reatu originis uel additamento etiam propriae uoluntatis. siue qui nouit siue qui ignorat siue qui iudicat siue qui non iudicat, quia et ipsa ignorantia in eis. qui intellegere noluerunt. sine dubitatione peccatum est, in eis autem, qui non potuerunt, poena peccati. ergo in utrisque non est iusta excusatio sed iusta damnatio.

### English translation (Claude)

In respect of this excuse, divine Scripture calls inexcusable all whom it convicts of sinning knowingly. Yet God's just judgment does not spare even those who have not heard; 'for all who have sinned without the law will perish without the law.' And although they seem to excuse themselves, he does not admit this excuse who knows that he made man upright and gave him a commandment of obedience, and that sin, even that which passed to his descendants, flowed only from the free choice of the will which he misused. For those who have not sinned are not condemned, since that sin passed from one to all, in whom all sinned in common before the personal sins of each. And so every sinner is inexcusable, whether by the guilt of origin or by the addition of his own will as well, whether he knows or does not know, whether he judges or does not judge; because ignorance itself, in those who did not wish to understand, is without doubt sin, and in those who could not, the punishment of sin. So in both cases there is no just excuse but just condemnation.

### Scripture references

- Rom 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 7:29: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 2:12; Eccl 7:29; Rom 5:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.27 (CSEL 57:196–197; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-27).

## Letter 194.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-28
- Source: CSEL 57:197–198
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Knowing sinners are inexcusable by their own standard, yet even Paul, who knew and delighted in the law, needed grace to be set free.

### Latin text

Ideo autem diuina eloquia eos inexcusabiles dicunt, qui non ignorantes sed scientes peccant. ut secundum iudicium superbiae suae, quo multum confidunt de uiribus propriae uoluntatis, se inexcusabiles uideant, quia de ignorantia iam non habent excusationem et nondum est iustitia, cui praesumebant sufficere uoluntatem. at uero ille, cui dominus et sciendi et oboediendi largitus est gratiam: Per legem. inquit, cognitio peccati et: Peccatum non cognoui nisi per legem; nam concupiscentiam nesciebam. nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces nec uult intellegi hominem praeceptricis legis ignarum sed liberatricis indigum gratiae, ubi dicit: Condelector legi dei secundum interiorem hominem et cum hac non solum scientia uerum etiam delectatione legis postea dicit: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. nemo itaque liberat a uulneribus illius trucidatoris nisi unius gratia saluatoris: nemo liberat uenundatos sub peccato a uinculis captiuitatis nisi gratia redimentis.

### English translation (Claude)

But the divine words call inexcusable those who sin not in ignorance but knowingly, so that, by the judgment of their own pride, by which they trust so much in the powers of their own will, they may see themselves to be inexcusable, since they no longer have the excuse of ignorance, and there is not yet the righteousness for which they presumed their will was sufficient. But he to whom the Lord granted the grace both of knowing and of obeying says: 'Through the law comes knowledge of sin', and, 'I did not know sin except through the law; for I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, You shall not covet.' And he means to be understood not a man ignorant of the law that commands but one in need of the grace that sets free, where he says, 'I delight in the law of God according to the inner man'; and with this not only knowledge but even delight in the law, he afterwards says: 'Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord.' So no one sets free from the wounds of that slaughterer except the grace of the one Saviour; no one sets free those sold under sin from the chains of captivity except the grace of the Redeemer.

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:20: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:22: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:14: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 3:20; Rom 7:7, 22, 24–25, 14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.28 (CSEL 57:197–198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-28).

## Letter 194.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-29
- Source: CSEL 57:198–199
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Because the saved are freed by grace alone, the excuse 'who resists his will?' cannot be just; it is folly that blames God.

### Latin text

Ac per hoc uniuersi, qui se in nequitiis et iniquitatibus excusatos uolunt ideo iustissime puniuntur, quoniam, qui liberantur. nonnisi gratia liberantur. nam si excusatio illa iusta esset. non inde iam gratia sed iustitia liberaret. cum uero non liberat nisi gratia, nihil iustum inuenit in eo. quem liberat. non uoluntatem, non operationem, non saltem ipsam excusationem; nam si haec iusta est, quisquis ea utitur. merito non gratia liberatur. nouimus enim liberari per gratiam Christi quosdam etiam eorum, qui dicunt: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? quae si iusta est excusatio. non iam gratuita gratia sed propter huius excusationis iustitiam liberantur. si autem gratia est. qua liberantur, profecto haec excusatio iusta non est. tunc enim uera gratia est, qua homo liberatur, si non secundum debitum iustitiae retribuitur. nihil ergo fit in eis. qui dicunt: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? nisi quod legitur in libro Salomonis: Insipientia uiri uiolat uias eius: deum autem causatur corde suo.

### English translation (Claude)

And so all who want to be excused in their wickedness and iniquities are most justly punished, because those who are set free are set free only by grace. For if that excuse were just, it would no longer be grace but justice that set them free. But since only grace sets free, it finds nothing just in the one it sets free: not the will, not the action, not even the excuse itself; for if this were just, whoever used it would be set free by merit, not by grace. For we know that some even of those who say, 'Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?', are set free by the grace of Christ. If this excuse is just, they are no longer set free by free grace but because of the justice of this excuse. But if it is grace by which they are set free, then certainly this excuse is not just. For it is true grace by which a person is set free only if it is not repaid according to what is owed in justice. Nothing else, then, is happening in those who say, 'Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?', than what we read in Solomon's book: 'The folly of a man corrupts his ways, but in his heart he blames God.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 19:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:19; Prov 19:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.29 (CSEL 57:198–199; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-29).

## Letter 194.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-30
- Source: CSEL 57:199–200
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God makes the vessels of wrath but condemns, not causes, their iniquity, which comes from the human will; only grace frees, inspiring faith, fear and prayer.

### Latin text

Quamuis itaque deus faciat uasa irae in perditionem, ut ostendat iram et demonstret potentiam suam, qua bene utatur etiam malis, et ut notas faciat diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae, quae facit in honorem non damnabili massae debitum sed suae gratiae largitate donatum. tamen in eisdem irae uasis propter meritum massae in contumeliam debitam factis. id est in hominibus propter naturae quidem bona creatis sed propter uitia supplicio destinatis iniquitatem, quam rectissime ueritas inprobat, damnare nouit ipse, non facere. sicut enim uoluntati eius tribuitur humana natura nullo dubitante laudanda, sic hominis uoluntati culpa tribuitur nullo recusante damnanda. quae uoluntas hominis aut hereditarium uitium transmisit in posteros, quos in se habuit, cum peccaret, aut adquisiuit etiam cetera uitia. cum in se ipso unusquisque perdite uiueret. sed neque ab illo. quod originaliter trahitur, neque ab his, quae unusquisque in uita propria uel non intellegendo uel nolendo intellegere mala congregat uel etiam instructus ex lege additamento praeuaricationis exaggerat, quisquam liberatur et iustificatur nisi gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum non solum remissione peccatorum sed prius ipsius inspiratione fidei et timoris dei impertito salubriter orationis affectu et effectu. donec sanet omnes languores nostros et redimat de corruptione uitam nostram et coronet nos in miseratione et misericordia.

### English translation (Claude)

Although, then, God makes vessels of wrath for destruction, to show his wrath and make known his power, by which he makes good use even of the evil, and to make known the riches of his glory for the vessels of mercy, which he makes for honour, not owed to the condemnable mass but given by the bounty of his grace, yet in those same vessels of wrath, made for the dishonour owed because of the merit of the mass, that is, in human beings created for the good of their nature but destined for punishment because of their vices, he knows how to condemn the iniquity which truth most rightly reproves, not to make it. For just as human nature, which no one doubts is to be praised, is attributed to his will, so fault, which no one refuses to condemn, is attributed to the human will. That human will either transmitted hereditary vice to the descendants it had in itself when it sinned, or acquired other vices too, when each one lived ruinously in himself. But neither from that which is drawn from origin, nor from the evils which each gathers in his own life, whether by not understanding or by not wishing to understand, or even, instructed by the law, heaps up by the addition of transgression, is anyone set free and justified except by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, not only by the remission of sins but first by the inspiration of faith itself and of the fear of God, and by the healthful imparting of the disposition and power of prayer, until he heals all our diseases, redeems our life from corruption, and crowns us with compassion and mercy.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:22: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:23: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 103:3 (102:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 103:4 (102:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:22–23; Ps 103:3–4 (102:3–4).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.30 (CSEL 57:199–200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-30).

## Letter 194.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-31
- Source: CSEL 57:200–201
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagian objection fails with infants: why does one die baptized and another unbaptized, when no merit distinguishes them and fate or fortune cannot be invoked?

### Latin text

Verum isti, qui personarum acceptorem fieri existimant deum, si in una eademque causa super alios ueniat misericordia eius, super alios maneat ira eius, nempe totas uires argumentationis humanae in paruulis perdunt. nam ut interim taceam, quod non est praeter paruulos quamlibet a materno utero recentissimos ea poena, de qua loquens apostolus ait: Per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem, unde non liberat nisi unus ille, de quo idem ait: Per unius iustificationem in omnes homines ad iustificationem uitae, ut hoc ergo interim omittam et hoc solum de paruulis dicam. quod ipsi quoque auctoritate euangelica territi uel potius Christianorum populorum concordissima fidei conspiratione perfracti sine ulla recusatione concedunt, quod nullus paruulus nisi renatus ex aqua et spiritu intrat in regnum caelorum, quam quaeso adlaturi sunt causam, quod alius sic gubernatur, ut baptizatus hinc exeat, alius infidelium manibus traditus uel etiam fidelium. priusquam ab eis baptizandus offeratur. expirat? an hoc fato uel fortunae daturi sunt? non opinor eos in tantam dementiam prorupturos quantulumcumque nomen Christianum tenere cupientes.

### English translation (Claude)

But these men who think God becomes a respecter of persons if, in one and the same case, his mercy comes upon some and his wrath remains upon others, surely lose all the force of human argument in the case of little children. For, to say nothing for the moment of the fact that little children, however newly come from their mother's womb, are not outside that punishment of which the apostle speaks, saying, 'Through the trespass of one it came upon all men to condemnation', from which no one sets free except that one of whom he also says, 'Through the justification of one upon all men to justification of life', to pass this over, then, for the moment, and to say only this about little children, which they themselves too, frightened by the authority of the Gospel, or rather overwhelmed by the most harmonious agreement in faith of Christian peoples, concede without any refusal, namely that no little child enters the kingdom of heaven unless reborn of water and the Spirit: what reason, I ask, will they give why one is so guided that he leaves this life baptized, while another, handed over to the hands of unbelievers, or even of believers, dies before he is presented by them for baptism? Will they attribute this to fate or fortune? I do not think that men who wish to keep the Christian name, however little, will break out into such madness.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:18; John 3:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.31 (CSEL 57:200–201; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-31).

## Letter 194.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-32
- Source: CSEL 57:201–202
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's providence brings some infants of the ungodly to baptism while infants of believers die unbaptized, which no human merit can explain.

### Latin text

Cur ergo in regnum caelorum non accepto regenerationis lauacro paruulus nullus intrabit? numquidnam ipse sibi parentes infideles uel neglegentes, de quibus nasceretur, elegit? quid dicam de inopinatis et repentinis innumerabilibus mortibus. quibus saepe etiam religiosorum Christianorum praeueniuntur et baptismo praeripiuntur infantes, cum e contrario sacrilegorum et inimicorum Christi aliquo modo in Christianorum manus uenientes ex hac uita non sine sacramento regenerationis emigrent? quid hic dicturi sunt, qui, ut gratia dari possit, nonnulla praecedere merita humana contendunt, ne sit personarum acceptor deus? quae tandem hic merita praecesserunt? si eorundem cogitaueris paruulorum, nulla sunt propria, utrisque est illa massa communis: si parentum adtenderis, bona sunt illa, quorum filii repentinis mortibus sine Christi baptismate perierunt, mala uero illa, quorum filii per Christianorum aliquam potestatem ad sacramenta ecclesiae peruenerunt. et tamen prouidentia dei, cui nostri capilli numerati sunt, sine cuius uoluntate non cadit passer in terram. quae nec fato premitur nec fortuitis casibus impeditur nec ulla iniquitate corrumpitur, ut renascantur ad hereditatem caelestem, non consulit omnibus paruulis filiorum suorum et nonnullis consulit etiam paruulis impiorum. iste infans de fidelibus coniugatis ortus. laetitia parentum susceptus. matris uel nutricis somnolentia suffocatus fit exsors expers suorum fidei; ille infans de sacrilego stupro nascitur. crudeli timore matris exponitur, alienorum misericordi pietate colligitur. eorum Christiana sollicitudine baptizatur, fit aeterni consors et particeps regni. ista cogitent, ista considerent, hic audeant dicere deum uel acceptorem in sua gratia personarum uel remuneratorem praecedentium meritorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Why, then, will no little child enter the kingdom of heaven without receiving the washing of regeneration? Did he himself choose unbelieving or negligent parents to be born of? What shall I say of the countless unexpected and sudden deaths by which infants even of devout Christians are often overtaken and snatched from baptism, while on the other hand the infants of sacrilegious people and enemies of Christ, coming somehow into Christian hands, do not leave this life without the sacrament of regeneration? What will they say here who contend that some human merits precede, so that grace can be given, lest God be a respecter of persons? What merits went before here? If you think of the little children themselves, they have none of their own; the mass is common to both. If you look to the parents, those whose children perished by sudden deaths without Christ's baptism were good, and those whose children reached the sacraments of the Church through the authority of some Christians were evil. And yet the providence of God, by whom our hairs are numbered, without whose will not a sparrow falls to the ground, which is neither pressed by fate nor hindered by chance events nor corrupted by any injustice, does not provide for all the little children of its own sons to be reborn to the heavenly inheritance, and does provide for some little children even of the ungodly. This infant, born of believing spouses, received with his parents' joy, smothered by the drowsiness of his mother or nurse, is made a stranger to the faith of his parents and without share in it; that infant, born of sacrilegious fornication, exposed by his mother's cruel fear, is picked up by the merciful kindness of strangers, baptized by their Christian concern, and made a sharer and partaker of the eternal kingdom. Let them think of these things, let them consider these things, and here let them dare to say that God is either a respecter of persons in his grace or a rewarder of preceding merits.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:29: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 10:30: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 10:29–30. 'Fornication' renders 'stuprum'. The digital text's 'fit exsors expers suorum fidei' is slightly damaged; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.32 (CSEL 57:201–202; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-32).

## Letter 194.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-33
- Source: CSEL 57:202–203
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Since infants have no merits, the Pelagians should acknowledge with Paul the unsearchable depth of God's judgments and allow Christ to save at any age.

### Latin text

Nam etsi conabuntur maioris aetatis aliqua merita suspicari seu mala seu bona. quid de ipsis infantibus dicent. quorum nec iste sibi ullis propriis meritis malis adquirere potuit uiolentiam suffocantis nec bonis ille diligentiam baptizantis? nimiae uanitatis et caecitatis sunt, si etiam his consideratis nondum dignantur exclamare nobiscum: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! non itaque misericordiae gratuitae dei pertinacissima aduersentur insania. sinant filium hominis in qualibet aetate quaerere et saluum facere, quod perierat, nec de inscrutabilibus iudiciis eius audeant iudicare, cur in una eademque causa super alium ueniat misericordia eius, super alium maneat ira eius.

### English translation (Claude)

For even if they try to suspect some merits, bad or good, of an older age, what will they say about these infants themselves, of whom the one could not, by any bad merits of his own, bring on himself the violence of the one who smothered him, nor the other, by good merits, the care of the one who baptized him? They are excessively vain and blind if, even after considering these things, they do not yet deign to cry out with us: 'O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and inscrutable his ways!' Let them not, then, oppose God's free mercy with most obstinate madness. Let them allow the Son of Man to seek and to save what was lost, at whatever age, and not dare to judge his unsearchable judgments, why in one and the same case his mercy comes upon one and his wrath remains upon another.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:33: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 19:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:33; Luke 19:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.33 (CSEL 57:202–203; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-33).

## Letter 194.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-34
- Source: CSEL 57:203–204
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: God's love of Jacob and hatred of Esau before birth show election by grace: he loved in Jacob his own gift and hated in Esau original sin.

### Latin text

Qui enim sunt isti. qui respondeant deo. quando quidem ille Rebeccae habenti geminos ex uno concubitu Isaac patris nostri, cum illi nondum nati nihil egissent boni uel mali, ut secundum electionem propositum eius maneret. electionem scilicet gratiae, non debiti, electionem. qua eligendos facit ipse. non inuenit, non ex operibus sed ex uocante dicit minori seruiturum esse maiorem? in quam sententiam beatus apostolus etiam testimonium prophetae longe posterioris adsumpsit: Iacob dilexi. Esau autem odio habui, ut intellegeretur hoc apertum postea per prophetam. quod. antequam illi nascerentur. erat in dei praedestinatione per gratiam. quid enim diligebat in Iacob. antequam natus fecisset aliquid boni. nisi gratuitum misericordiae suae donum? et quid oderat in Esau, antequam natus fecisset aliquid mali, nisi originale peccatum? nam nec in illo diligeret iustitiam, quam nullam ille fecerat. neque in isto odisset naturam. quam bonam ipse fecerat.

### English translation (Claude)

For who are these men to answer back to God, when to Rebecca, carrying twins from one act of intercourse with our father Isaac, though they were not yet born and had done nothing good or evil, so that his purpose according to election might stand (the election, that is, of grace, not of debt, the election by which he himself makes, not finds, those to be chosen), he says, not from works but from him who calls, that the elder will serve the younger? To this statement the blessed apostle also added the testimony of a much later prophet, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated', so that it might be understood that what was made plain later through the prophet was in God's predestination through grace before they were born. For what did he love in Jacob, before he was born and had done anything good, except the free gift of his mercy? And what did he hate in Esau, before he was born and had done anything evil, except original sin? For neither did he love in the one a righteousness which he had not done, nor hate in the other the nature which he himself had made good.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 25:23: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:10–13 (Gen 25:23; Mal 1:2–3).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.34 (CSEL 57:203–204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-9/#p-194-34).

## Letter 194.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-35
- Source: CSEL 57:204–205
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagian appeal to foreseen works is refuted by Paul himself, who answered the charge of injustice not by foreseen works but by God's free mercy.

### Latin text

Mirum est autem, cum his coartantur angustiis. in quanta se abrupta praecipitent metuentes retia ueritatis. Ideo, inquiunt. nondum natorum alium oderat, alium diligebat, quia eorum futura opera praeuidebat. quis istum acutissimum sensum defuisse apostolo non miretur? hoc quippe ille non uidit, quando sibi uelut aduersantis obiecta quaestione non id potius tam breue, tam apertum, tam, sicut isti putant, uerum absolutumque respondit. cum enim rem stupendam proposuisset. quo modo de nondum natis nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali recte dici potuerit, quod unum deus dilexerit, alterum odio habuerit, ipse sibi obiecta quaestione motum exprimens auditoris: Quid ergo dicemus? inquit, numquid iniquitas apud deum? absit! hic ergo erat locus, ut diceret. quod isti sentiunt: Futura enim deus opera praeuidebat. quando minori maiorem seruiturum esse dicebat." non autem hoc apostolus dicit, sed potius, ne quisquam de suorum operum meritis audeat gloriari, ad dei gratiam et gloriam commendandam uoluit ualere, quod dicit. cum enim dixisset: Absit, ut sit iniquitas apud deum, tamquam ei diceremus: Unde hoc ostendis, cum adseras non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum esse: Maior seruiet minori? Moysi enim dicit, inquit: Miserebor, cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo, cui misericors fuero igitur non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei. ubi nunc merita, ubi opera uel praeterita uel futura tamquam liberi arbitrii uiribus adimpleta siue adimplenda? nonne apertam protulit apostolus de gratuitae gratiae, hoc est uerae gratiae commendatione sententiam? nonne stultam fecit deus haereticorum sapientiam?

### English translation (Claude)

But it is amazing, when they are hemmed in by these straits, over what precipices they throw themselves, fearing the nets of truth. 'He hated one of the unborn and loved the other', they say, 'because he foresaw their future works.' Who would not be amazed that the apostle lacked this most acute insight? For he did not see it when, having put the question to himself as if from an opponent, he did not give this answer, so short, so plain, and, as they think, true and complete. For when he had set forth an astonishing thing, how it could rightly be said of those not yet born and doing nothing good or evil that God loved one and hated the other, he put the question to himself, expressing the hearer's reaction: 'What then shall we say?' he says; 'Is there injustice with God? By no means!' Here, then, was the place to say what these men think: 'For God foresaw their future works when he said that the elder would serve the younger.' But the apostle does not say this; rather, so that no one might dare to boast of the merits of his works, he wanted what he says to serve to commend God's grace and glory. For when he had said, 'Far be it that there should be injustice with God', as if we said to him, 'How do you show this, when you assert that it was not from works but from him who calls that it was said, The elder will serve the younger?', he says: 'For he says to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show compassion to whom I have been compassionate. So it depends not on the one who wills or the one who runs, but on God who shows mercy.' Where now are merits, where are works, past or future, as if fulfilled or to be fulfilled by the powers of free choice? Has not the apostle pronounced a clear judgment in commendation of free grace, that is, true grace? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of heretics?

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 33:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:14–16 (Exod 33:19); 1 Cor 1:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.35 (CSEL 57:204–205; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-35).

## Letter 194.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-36
- Source: CSEL 57:205
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's purpose was to commend grace through the children of promise, since what God promises God himself performs.

### Latin text

Quid autem agebatur, ut hoc apostolus diceret, ut eorum geminorum commemoraret exemplum? quid persuadere moliebatur? quid inculcare cupiebat? nempe hoc, quod ipsorum oppugnat amentia, quod superbi non capiunt, quod sapere nolunt. qui ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. de ipsa quippe gratia satis agebat apostolus et ideo promissionis filios commemorabat. quod enim promittit deus. non facit nisi deus; habet namque aliquid rationis et ueritatis. ut homo promittat et deus faciat; ut autem homo se facere dicat, quod promiserit deus, superbae impietatis est reprobus sensus.

### English translation (Claude)

What was at stake, that the apostle should say this, that he should mention the example of those twins? What was he trying to persuade? What did he wish to drive home? Surely this, which their madness attacks, which the proud do not grasp, which those refuse to understand who, ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. For the apostle was occupied with grace itself, and therefore he mentioned the children of the promise. For what God promises, no one does but God; for it has some reason and truth that a man should promise and God do; but that a man should say he does what God has promised is the reprobate mind of proud ungodliness.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 1:28: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:3; Rom 9:8; Rom 1:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.36 (CSEL 57:205; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-36).

## Letter 194.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-37
- Source: CSEL 57:205–206
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Isaac's birth from a barren mother signified the children of promise, and 'one act of intercourse' excludes any merit of the parents distinguishing Jacob from Esau.

### Latin text

Commendans ergo filios promissionis hoc prius significatum ostendit per Isaac. filium Abrahae. euidentius namque opus dei apparet in eo. quem non genuit usitatus ordo naturae de sterilibus uisceribus et senectute confectis. ut in filiis dei, qui futuri praenuntiabantur, hoc esset signum diuini operis non humani, in Isaac, inquit, uocabitur tibi semen. hoc est non qui filii carnis, hi filii dei, sed filii promissionis deputantur in semen. promissionis enim uerbum hoc est: Ad hoc tempus ueniam et erit Sarrae filius. non solum autem. inquit, sed et Rebecca ex uno concubitu habens Isaac patris nostri. quo pertinuit, ut adderet ex uno concubitu. nisi ut non solum de suis neque de parentum meritis aliorum sed ne de ipsius quidem unius patris mutata forte in melius uoluntate gloriaretur Iacob dicens ideo se a creatore dilectum, quia pater eius, quando eum seminauit, melioribus laudabilior moribus fuit? ex uno, inquit, concubitu: unum tunc ad eos seminandos meritum patris. unum ad concipiendos meritum matris, quia, etsi mater eos. donec pareret, uisceribus portauit inclusos et forte uoluntates affectionesque uariauit, non uni sed ambobus utique uariauit. quos pariter uentre portauit.

### English translation (Claude)

Commending, then, the children of the promise, he shows that this was first signified through Isaac, the son of Abraham. For the work of God appears more evidently in one whom the usual order of nature did not beget from a barren womb worn out with old age, so that in the children of God who were foretold as to come there might be this sign of a divine, not a human, work. 'In Isaac', he says, 'your offspring will be called'; that is, 'not the children of the flesh are children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. For this is the word of promise: At this time I will come, and Sarah will have a son. And not only so, but also Rebecca, having conceived from one act of intercourse with our father Isaac.' Why did he add 'from one act of intercourse', except so that Jacob might not boast, not only of his own merits nor of those of other parents, but not even of a will of his one father perhaps changed for the better, saying that he was loved by the Creator because his father, when he begot him, was more praiseworthy in better conduct? 'From one act of intercourse', he says: one merit of the father then in begetting them, one merit of the mother in conceiving them; because even if the mother, carrying them enclosed in her womb until she gave birth, perhaps varied in her wishes and feelings, she certainly varied them not for one but for both, whom she carried equally in her womb.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 21:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 18:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:7–10 (Gen 21:12; Gen 18:10).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.37 (CSEL 57:205–206; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-37).

## Letter 194.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-38
- Source: CSEL 57:206–207
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul wanted Jacob to glory only in the Lord, recognizing that grace alone distinguished him from Esau in the same condemned mass.

### Latin text

Intentio igitur intuenda est apostoli. quo modo propter gratiam commendandam nolit eum, de quo dictum est: Iacob dilexi. nisi in domino gloriari, ut. cum ex eodem patre. eadem matre, uno concubitu. antequam aliquid egissent boni aut mali, alterum diligit deus, odit alterum, intellegat Iacob ex illa massa originalis iniquitatis, ubi fratrem, cum quo habuit communem causam, uidet per iustitiam meruisse damnari, nonnisi per gratiam se potuisse discerni. nondum enim nascentibus. inquit, nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali. ut secundum electionem propositum dei maneret, non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum est ei: Maior seruiet minori.

### English translation (Claude)

We must look, then, to the apostle's intention: how, in order to commend grace, he wants the one of whom it was said, 'Jacob I loved', to glory only in the Lord; so that, since from the same father, the same mother, one act of intercourse, before they had done anything good or evil, God loves one and hates the other, Jacob may understand that from that mass of original iniquity, in which he sees that his brother, with whom he had a common case, deserved by justice to be condemned, he could have been distinguished only by grace. 'For while they were not yet born', he says, 'and had done nothing good or evil, so that God's purpose according to election might stand, not from works but from him who calls, it was said to her: The elder will serve the younger.'

### Scripture references

- Mal 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Mal 1:2; 1 Cor 1:31; Rom 9:11–12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.38 (CSEL 57:206–207; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-38).

## Letter 194.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-39
- Source: CSEL 57:207–208
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul elsewhere teaches election by grace without works, and in Rom 9 concludes that God has mercy freely and hardens justly.

### Latin text

Electionem autem gratiae nullis fieri operum praecedentibus meritis alio loco apertissime idem apostolus ostendens: Sic ergo. inquit, et in hoc tempore reliquiae per electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia, secundum hanc ergo gratiam etiam propheticum testimonium consequenter adsumens: Sicut scriptum est, inquit, Iacob dilexi. Esau autem odio habui, et continuo: Quid ergo dicemus? inquit, numquid iniquitas apud deum? absit! sed quare absit? an propter opera. quae futura praeuidebat amborum? immo et hoc absit: Moysi enim dicit: Miserebor, cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo, cui misericors fuero. igitur non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei. atque ut in uasis, quae perfecta sunt ad perditionem. quae damnatae debita est massae, agnoscant uasa ex eadem massa in honorem facta, quid eis misericordia diuina largita sit: Dicit enim, inquit, scriptura Pharaoni, quia ad hoc te excitaui, ut ostendam in te potentiam meam et ut glorificetur nomen meum in uniuersa terra. denique ad utrumque concludit: Ergo. cuius uult, miseretur et, quem uult, obdurat. hoc facit, apud quem non erit iniquitas. miseretur itaque gratuito dono, obdurat autem iustissimo merito.

### English translation (Claude)

And the same apostle shows most plainly in another place that the election of grace takes place with no preceding merits of works: 'So too at the present time', he says, 'a remnant has been saved by the election of grace. But if by grace, it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.' In accordance with this grace, then, he consequently adds the prophetic testimony too: 'As it is written,' he says, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated', and at once: 'What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God? By no means!' But why 'by no means'? Because of the works of both which he foresaw as future? Rather, by no means that either: 'For he says to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show compassion to whom I have been compassionate. So it depends not on the one who wills or the one who runs, but on God who shows mercy.' And so that in the vessels made for destruction, which is owed to the condemned mass, the vessels made for honour from the same mass may recognize what divine mercy has bestowed on them: 'For the Scripture says', he says, 'to Pharaoh: For this very purpose I raised you up, to show my power in you, and that my name may be glorified in all the earth.' Finally he concludes to both: 'So then he has mercy on whom he wills, and he hardens whom he wills.' He does this with whom there will be no injustice. He has mercy, then, by free gift, but hardens by most just desert.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:17: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:5–6; Rom 9:13–18 (Mal 1:2–3; Exod 33:19; Exod 9:16).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.39 (CSEL 57:207–208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-39).

## Letter 194.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-40
- Source: CSEL 57:208
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Whoever hears Paul's answer and despises it is justly hardened; whoever does not despise it has been freely helped.

### Latin text

Sed dicat adhuc superbi infidelis elatio uel puniti damnabilis excusatio: Quid adhuc conqueritur? nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? dicat et audiat, quod conuenit homini: o homo, tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? et cetera, de quibus iam, quantum potui, satis ac saepe disserui. audiat haec et non contemnat. quod si contempserit. etiam ut contemneret, se inueniat obduratum; si autem non contempserit, etiam ut non contemneret, se credat adiutum. sed obduratum debite, adiutum gratis.

### English translation (Claude)

But let the arrogance of the proud unbeliever, or the excuse of the condemned under punishment, still say: 'Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?' Let him say it, and let him hear what befits a human being: 'O man, who are you to answer back to God?', and the rest, on which I have already spoken enough and often, as far as I could. Let him hear these things and not despise them. But if he despises them, let him find that he has been hardened even so as to despise them; and if he does not despise them, let him believe that he has been helped even so as not to despise them; but hardened as he deserved, helped freely.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:19–20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.40 (CSEL 57:208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-40).

## Letter 194.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-41
- Source: CSEL 57:208
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Foreseen works cannot explain why some dying infants are baptized and others not, since they will never have works.

### Latin text

Neque enim, si duorum de Isaac patriarcha geminorum. quod quidem iam ostendimus quanta caecitate dicatur, futura praeuidit deus opera, quia uixerunt atque senuerunt, et propterea Iacob dilexit, Esau autem odio habuit, ideo moriturorum etiam paruulorum potest quisquam dicere, ut huic ad percipiendum baptismum non consulat, illi autem consulat. deum futura eorum opera praeuidere; quo modo enim futura dicuntur, quae nulla erunt?

### English translation (Claude)

For even if it could be said of the twins born of the patriarch Isaac (and we have already shown with what blindness it is said) that God foresaw their future works, because they lived and grew old, and therefore loved Jacob but hated Esau, no one can for that reason say of little children who are going to die that God foresees their future works, so that he does not provide for this one to receive baptism but does provide for that one. For how can works be called future that will never exist?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.41 (CSEL 57:208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-41).

## Letter 194.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-42
- Source: CSEL 57:208–210
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The theory that God punishes sins infants would have committed is absurd and contradicts the Pelagians' own promise of salvation for unbaptized infants.

### Latin text

Sed deus, inquiunt, in eis, quos hinc aufert. praeuidet, quem ad modum uicturus fuisset quisque, si uiueret; ideo, quem nequiter nouit fuisse uicturum. sine baptismo facit et mori sic in eo puniens opera mala, non quae fecit, sed quae facturus fuit. si ergo diuinitus, etiam quae commissa non sunt. mala opera puniuntur, primo adtendant, quam falso polliceantur in damnationem paruulos non ituros, qui sine baptismate moriuntur. qui si propterea non baptizantur. quia male uicturi erant, si uiuerent, propter ipsam quippe malam uitam procul dubio damnabuntur. si etiam mala. quae fuerant futura. damnantur. deinde si eis ad percipiendum baptismatis consulitur sacramentum, quos nouit deus, si uiuerent. bene fuisse uicturos, cur non omnes tenentur in uita, quam bonis operibus ornaturi sunt? cur etiam eorum, qui baptizantur, quidam diu uiuentes pessime uiuunt et usque ad apostasian aliquando perueniunt? cur ipsum primum coniugium peccatorum, quos utique nouerat peccaturos, non de paradiso ante proiecit, ne ibi committerent, quod tam sancto loco esset indignum, si iuste peccata etiam nondum commissa puniuntur? quid denique praestatur ei, qui rapitur. ne malitia mutet intellectum eius et ne fictio decipiat animam eius, si iuste etiam illa puniuntur. quae licet non fecerit, fuerat tamen uiuendo facturus? postremo cur non ad percipiendum regenerationis lauacrum ei magis consulitur morituro, qui male fuerat uicturus, si uiueret, ut ei peccata, quae fuerat commissurus, remittantur in baptismo? quis enim est tam uecors. qui ea neget per baptismum posse dimitti, quae sine baptismo dicit posse puniri?

### English translation (Claude)

'But God', they say, 'foresees in those whom he takes from here how each would have lived if he had lived; and so he makes the one whom he knew would have lived wickedly die without baptism, punishing in him evil works, not those he did, but those he would have done.' If, then, even evil works that were not committed are punished by God, let them first notice how falsely they promise that little children who die without baptism will not go to condemnation. For if they are not baptized because they would have lived badly if they had lived, they will surely be condemned for that very bad life, if even the evils that would have been are condemned. Next, if the sacrament of baptism is provided for those whom God knew would have lived well if they had lived, why are not all kept alive in the life they will adorn with good works? Why do some even of the baptized, living long, live very badly, and sometimes even go as far as apostasy? Why did he not cast out of paradise beforehand the first couple of sinners, whom he certainly knew would sin, so that they would not commit there what was unworthy of so holy a place, if even sins not yet committed are justly punished? Finally, what is granted to one who is snatched away 'lest wickedness change his understanding and lest deceit beguile his soul', if those things too are justly punished which, though he did not do them, he would have done by living? Lastly, why is it not rather provided for the one who is going to die, and who would have lived badly if he had lived, to receive the washing of regeneration, so that the sins he would have committed may be remitted in baptism? For who is so senseless as to deny that those things can be forgiven through baptism which he says can be punished without baptism?

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 4:11 (extrabiblical on this site).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.42 (CSEL 57:208–210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-42).

## Letter 194.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-43
- Source: CSEL 57:210
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports these views because he has heard them; the Pelagians, cornered by Scripture and the rite of infant baptism with its exorcism and renunciation, resort to folly.

### Latin text

Sed disputando aduersus eos, qui usquequaque conuicti etiam non commissorum peccatorum deum persuadere moliuntur ultorem, uerendum est, ne nos in eos ista fingere existimemur, illi autem nullo modo tam hebetes esse credantur, ut haec uel sentiant uel cuiquam persuadere conentur. uerum tamen nisi eos haec dicere audissem, refellenda esse non arbitrarer. circumstipantur enim et diuinarum auctoritate lectionum et antiquitus tradito ac retento firmo ecclesiae ritu in baptismate paruulorum, ubi apertissime demonstrantur infantes, et cum exorcizantur et cum ei se per eos, a quibus gestantur, renuntiare respondent, a diaboli dominatione liberari, et non inuenientes, qua eant, pergunt in praecipitem stultitiam, dum nolunt mutare sententiam.

### English translation (Claude)

But in arguing against those who, convicted on every side, try to persuade us that God is the avenger even of sins not committed, we must fear lest we be thought to invent these things against them, and lest they be believed in no way so dull as to think these things or try to persuade anyone of them. Yet I would not have thought them worth refuting if I had not heard them say these things. For they are hemmed in both by the authority of the divine readings and by the firm rite of the Church, handed down and kept from of old, in the baptism of little children, in which it is most plainly shown that infants, both when they are exorcized and when they answer through those who carry them that they renounce him, are set free from the dominion of the devil; and not finding where to go, they rush into headlong folly, rather than change their opinion.

### Translation notes

- The rite of infant baptism included exorcism and the renunciation of the devil spoken by the sponsors.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.43 (CSEL 57:210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-43).

## Letter 194.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-44
- Source: CSEL 57:210–211
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Children of baptized parents still inherit sin through concupiscence, as the seed of a cultivated olive yields a wild olive; the Church must baptize all infants, as farmers graft all shoots.

### Latin text

Illud sane sibi uidentur acutissime dicere: Quo modo peccatum transit in filios fidelium, quod in parentibus non dubitamus dimissum esse per baptismum? quasi propterea possit non habere generatio carnalis, quod sola tollit regeneratio spiritalis. aut uero in baptismo concupiscentiae carnis infirmitas continuo sanatur, sicut continuo reatus eius aboletur sed gratia renascendi non condicione nascendi? unde quisquis per hanc concupiscentiam etiam de renato nascitur, sine dubitatione oberit nato, nisi et ipse similiter renascatur. uerum quicquid est in hac quaestione difficultatis, ita in agro Christi non impedit operarios eius. quominus ab eis in peccatorum remissione baptizentur infantes. siue de infidelibus siue de fidelibus nati sunt, sicut agricolas non impedit, quominus ab eis inserendi cura in oleas conuertantur oleastri. siue de oleastris siue de oleis oriantur. nam et hoc si. ut respondeat. rustico proponatur, quae causa sit, ut, cum aliud sit olea aliud oleaster, non tamen nisi oleaster de semine utroque nascatur. non omittit inserendi operationem, etiamsi non possit istam soluere quaestionem: alioquin, dum ex oliuae semine exorta uirgulta non aliud quam oleas esse existimat, efficit desidia uanitatis, ut totus ille ager amara sterilitate siluescat.

### English translation (Claude)

They do indeed seem to themselves to say something very acute: 'How does sin pass to the children of believers, when we do not doubt it has been forgiven in the parents through baptism?' As if carnal generation could therefore not have what only spiritual regeneration takes away! Or is the weakness of the concupiscence of the flesh healed at once in baptism, as its guilt is at once abolished, but by the grace of being reborn, not by the condition of being born? Hence whoever is born through this concupiscence, even of one reborn, will beyond doubt be harmed by it, unless he too is likewise reborn. But whatever difficulty there is in this question, in the field of Christ it does not prevent his workers from baptizing infants for the remission of sins, whether they are born of unbelievers or believers; just as it does not prevent farmers from turning wild olives into olives by the care of grafting, whether they spring from wild olives or from olives. For if this question were put to a countryman for him to answer, what is the reason why, though the olive is one thing and the wild olive another, nothing but a wild olive grows from the seed of either, he does not omit the work of grafting even if he cannot solve this question. Otherwise, while he supposes that the shoots sprung from the seed of the olive are nothing but olives, he would by the sloth of his vanity make that whole field run wild in bitter barrenness.

### Scripture references

- Rom 11:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 11:17–24 underlies the image.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.44 (CSEL 57:210–211; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-44).

## Letter 194.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-45
- Source: CSEL 57:211–212
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The Pelagian claim that infants profess belief in the remission of sins only for others is a laughable evasion.

### Latin text

Nam illud, quod excogitauerunt, cum ueritatis pondere premerentur, quia fidelis dominus in uerbis suis et propterea eius ecclesia nullo modo fallaciter paruulos in peccatorum remissione baptizat, sed, ut fide agatur, quod agitur, utique fit, quod dicitur, — quod ergo excogitauerunt. cum haec eos apertissima moles ueritatis urgueret, quis non Christianus inrideat, quamlibet uersutissimum cernat? dicunt enim ueraciter quidem respondere paruulos per ora gestantium in remissionem se credere peccatorum, non tamen quia sibi remittuntur. sed quia credunt, quod in ecclesia uel in baptismo remittantur. in quibus inueniuntur, non in quibus nulla sunt. ac per hoc nolunt eos ita baptizari in remissione peccatorum, tamquam in eis fiat ipsa remissio, quos contendunt nullum habere peccatum, sed quoniam licet sine peccato in eo tamen baptismate baptizantur, quo fit in quibusque peccatoribus remissio peccatorum.

### English translation (Claude)

For what they devised when pressed by the weight of truth (that the Lord is faithful in his words, and therefore his Church in no way baptizes little children deceitfully for the remission of sins, but, so that what is done is done in faith, what is said certainly happens), what they devised, then, when this most evident mass of truth pressed on them, what Christian would not laugh at, however very cunning he sees it to be? For they say that little children truly answer through the mouths of those who carry them that they believe in the remission of sins, not because sins are remitted to them, but because they believe that sins are remitted in the Church or in baptism to those in whom they are found, not to those in whom there are none. And therefore they will not have them baptized for the remission of sins as if the remission takes place in them, since they contend that they have no sin, but because, though without sin, they are nevertheless baptized in that baptism in which remission of sins takes place in all sinners.

### Scripture references

- Ps 145:13 (144:13 Vulg.): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 145:13 (Vulg. 144:13) ('faithful in his words').

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.45 (CSEL 57:211–212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-45).

## Letter 194.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-46
- Source: CSEL 57:212–213
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The exorcism of infants shows the devil rules them through sin; and since the Pelagians admit infants believe through sponsors, unbaptized infants as unbelievers are condemned, which presupposes original sin.

### Latin text

Fieri quidem potest, ut haec uersipellis astutia subtilius et acutius ex otio refellatur. uerum tamen secundum istam suam calliditatem non inueniunt, quid ad hoc respondeant. quod exorcizantur et exsufflantur infantes. hoc enim procul dubio fallaciter fit, si diabolus eis non dominatur; si autem dominatur et ideo non fallaciter exorcizantur et exsufflantur, per quid dominatur nisi per peccatum princeps utique peccatorum: proinde si iam erubescunt nec audent dicere haec in ecclesia mendaciter geri, fateantur, quod perierat, etiam in paruulis quaeri. neque enim nisi propter peccatum perierat. quod nisi per gratiam non potest quaeri. non potest inueniri. sed deo gratias, quod saltem, cum argumentantur contra remissionem peccatorum, ne fieri credatur in paruulis. iam tamen quamuis per corda et ora maiorum credere paruulos confitentur. sicut ergo audiunt dominum dicentem: Qui non renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu. non intrabit in regnum caelorum. propter quod eos baptizandos esse concedunt, sic audiant eundem dominum dicentem: Qui non crediderit. condemnabitur, quia sicut eos renasci per ministerium baptizantium ita etiam credere per corda et ora respondentium confitentur. audeant ergo dicere, quod a iusto deo innocens condemnabitur, si nullo uinculo peccati originalis innectitur.

### English translation (Claude)

It may indeed be that this shifty cunning could be refuted more subtly and sharply at leisure. Yet with this cleverness of theirs they find nothing to answer to the fact that infants are exorcized and breathed upon. For this is certainly done deceitfully if the devil does not rule over them; but if he does rule over them, and therefore they are not exorcized and breathed upon deceitfully, through what does he rule, if not through sin, being indeed the prince of sinners? Accordingly, if they now blush and do not dare to say that these things are done falsely in the Church, let them confess that what was lost is sought even in little children. For it was lost only because of sin, and it cannot be sought, cannot be found, except through grace. But thanks be to God that at least, while arguing against the remission of sins so that it may not be believed to take place in little children, they nevertheless now confess that little children believe, though through the hearts and mouths of their elders. Just as, then, they hear the Lord saying, 'Whoever is not reborn of water and the Spirit will not enter the kingdom of heaven', for which reason they concede that they are to be baptized, so let them hear the same Lord saying, 'Whoever does not believe will be condemned'; for just as they confess that they are reborn through the ministry of those who baptize, so they confess that they believe through the hearts and mouths of those who answer. Let them dare, then, to say that an innocent will be condemned by a just God, if he is entangled in no bond of original sin.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:10: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 16:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The 'breathing upon' (exsufflatio) was part of the baptismal exorcism. Luke 19:10; John 3:5; Mark 16:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.46 (CSEL 57:212–213; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-46).

## Letter 194.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-47
- Source: CSEL 57:213–214
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Sixtus to report further Pelagian arguments and his own replies, since heresies rouse the Church to study Scripture more carefully.

### Latin text

Si sermo iste prolixus est et onerosus occupationibus tuis. da ueniam, quia, ut haec ad te scriberem et prouocatus litteris tuis indicibus erga nos beniuolentiae tuae tecum ista conloquerer, etiam ego uim feci interrumpendis occupationibus meis. si qua illos alia excogitare aduersus fidem catholicam scieritis et quaecumque aduersus eos. ne dominici gregis infirma deuastent, uos quoque fideli et plane pastorali dilectione disseritis, nota facite nobis. haereticorum quippe inquietudine. ut scripturas uigilantius perscrutemur, unde, ne ouili Christi noceant, eis possit occurri, tamquam de somno ignauiae nostra excitatur industria. ita per multiplicem gratiam saluatoris. etiam quod inimicus in perniciem machinatur. deus conuertit in adiutorium. quoniam diligentibus eum omnia cooperantur in bonum.

### English translation (Claude)

If this discourse is long and burdensome to your occupations, forgive me; for in order to write this to you and, prompted by your letter, the token of your kindness toward us, to converse with you on these things, I too did violence to myself by interrupting my occupations. If you learn of any other things they devise against the Catholic faith, and whatever you too argue against them with faithful and truly pastoral love, so that they may not lay waste the weak of the Lord's flock, let us know. For by the restlessness of heretics our diligence is roused, as from the sleep of sloth, to search the Scriptures more vigilantly for the means by which they can be met, so that they may not harm the fold of Christ. So, through the manifold grace of the Saviour, God turns to our help even what the enemy contrives for our ruin, since for those who love him all things work together for good.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 4:10: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 8:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Pet 4:10; Rom 8:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 194.47 (CSEL 57:213–214; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-194-47).

## Letter 195.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-195-1
- Source: CSEL 57:214–216
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome writes to Augustine praising his steadfastness against the Pelagians, for which heretics hate them both.

### Latin text

Omni quidem tempore beatitudinem tuam eo, quo decet honore ueneratus sum et habitantem in te dilexi dominum saluatorem; sed nunc. si fieri potest, cumulo aliquid addimus et plena complemus, ut absque tui nominis mentione ne unam quidem horam praeterire patiamur, qui contra flantes uentos ardore fidei perstitisti maluistique, quantum in te fuit, solus liberari de Sodomis quam cum pereuntibus commorari. scit. quid dicam, prudentia tua. macte uirtute in orbe celebraris. catholici te conditorem antiquae rursum fidei uenerantur atque suscipiunt et, quod signum maioris gloriae est, omnes haeretici detestantur et me pari persequuntur odio, ut, quos gladiis. nequeant, uoto interficiant. incolumem et mei memorem te Christi domini clementia tueatur. domine uenerande et beatissime papa.

### English translation (Claude)

At all times I have revered Your Blessedness with fitting honour and have loved the Lord the Saviour dwelling in you; but now, if possible, we add something to the heap and fill up what is full, so that we do not let even a single hour pass without mention of your name, you who have stood firm with ardent faith against the blowing winds and preferred, as far as it lay with you, to be set free from Sodom alone rather than to stay with those who were perishing. Your prudence knows what I mean. Well done! You are celebrated throughout the world. Catholics revere and embrace you as the restorer of the ancient faith, and, what is a sign of greater glory, all heretics detest you, and they persecute me with equal hatred, so that those whom they cannot kill with swords they kill in wish. May the clemency of Christ the Lord keep you safe and mindful of me, venerable lord and most blessed father.

### Scripture references

- Gen 19:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 195 is from Jerome to Augustine (AD 418). Gen 19 (Lot's escape from Sodom). 'Father' renders 'papa', an honorific then used of bishops.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 195.1 (CSEL 57:214–216; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/194-35/#p-195-1).

## Letter 196.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-1
- Source: CSEL 57:216
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies, at the request of the aged primate Donatianus, to Bishop Asellicus's letter about avoiding Judaizing.

### Latin text

Litteras sanctitatis tuae, quas ad uenerabilem senem Donatianum de cauendi Iudaismi disceptatione misisti, ad me ipse dignatus est mittere atque, ut eis responderem. petendo uehementius imperauit. quem ueritus contemnere. ut possum. domino adiuuante respondeo gratum existimans etiam caritati tuae, quod ad te scribendo illi iubenti, quem pro suis meritis ambo ueneramur. obtemperare non rennui.

### English translation (Claude)

The letter of Your Holiness, which you sent to the venerable old man Donatianus on the question of avoiding Judaism, he himself deigned to send to me, and by asking very earnestly commanded me to answer it. Fearing to disregard him, I answer as well as I can with the Lord's help, thinking that it will also be welcome to Your Charity that, in writing to you, I did not refuse to obey him whom we both revere for his merits.

### Translation notes

- Letter 196, to Asellicus, a bishop in Byzacena (ca. AD 418). Donatianus was primate of Byzacena.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.1 (CSEL 57:216; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-1).

## Letter 196.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-2
- Source: CSEL 57:216–217
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul taught in Galatians that Christians, especially Gentiles, must not Judaize, since justification is by faith in Christ.

### Latin text

Christianos maxime ex gentibus uenientes iudaizare non oportere Paulus apostolus docet, ubi ait: Dixi Petro coram omnibus: Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non Iudaice uiuis, quem ad modum gentes cogis iudaizare? et secutus adiunxit: Nos natura Iudaei et non ex gentibus peccatores scientes autem, quoniam non iustificatur homo ex operibus legis nisi per fidem Iesu Christi. et nos in Christo Iesu credidimus. ut iustificemur per fidem Christi et non ex operibus legis. quoniam ex operibus legis non iustificabitur omnis caro.

### English translation (Claude)

The apostle Paul teaches that Christians, especially those coming from the Gentiles, ought not to Judaize, where he says: 'I said to Peter before them all: If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to Judaize?' And he went on to add: 'We who are Jews by nature and not sinners from the Gentiles, yet knowing that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, we too have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no flesh will be justified.'

### Scripture references

- Gal 2:14: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:15: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 2:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 2:14–16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.2 (CSEL 57:216–217; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-2).

## Letter 196.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-3
- Source: CSEL 57:217–218
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Not only the ceremonial works of the law but even its moral command 'You shall not covet' does not justify without faith in Christ, as Rom 7 shows.

### Latin text

Non solum autem illa opera legis, quae sunt in ueteribus sacramentis et nunc reuelato testamento nouo non obseruantur a Christianis, sicuti est circumcisio praeputii et sabbati carnalis uacatio et a quibusdam escis abstentio et pecorum in sacrificiis immolatio et neomenia et azymum et cetera huius modi. uerum etiam illud, quod in lege dictum est: Non concupisces, quod utique etiam Christianis nullus ambigit esse dicendum. non iustificat hominem nisi per fidem Iesu Christi et gratiam dei per Christum dominum nostrum. idem ipse quippe dicit apostolus: Quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? absit! sed peccatum non cognoui nisi per legem; nam concupiscentiam nesciebam. nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. occasione autem accepta peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est. ego autem uiuebam aliquando sine lege. adueniente autem mandato peccatum reuixit, ego autem mortuus sum et inuentum est mihi mandatum, quod erat in uitam, hoc esse in mortem. peccatum enim occasione accepta per mandatum fefellit me et per illud occidit. itaque lex quidem sancta et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum. quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? absit! sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. ut fiat super modum peccatum peccans per mandatum. scimus enim, quia lex spiritalis est, ego autem carnalis sum uenundatus sub peccato. quod enim operor, ignoro; non enim, quod uolo, hoc ago. sed, quod odi, illud facio. si autem. quod uolo. hoc facio, consentio legi, quoniam bona est.

### English translation (Claude)

And not only those works of the law which belong to the old sacraments and are not observed by Christians now that the new covenant has been revealed, such as circumcision of the foreskin, the carnal rest of the sabbath, abstinence from certain foods, the slaughter of animals in sacrifices, the new moon, unleavened bread and other things of this kind, but even what is said in the law, 'You shall not covet', which no one doubts must be said to Christians too, does not justify a person except through faith in Jesus Christ and the grace of God through Christ our Lord. For the same apostle says: 'What then shall we say? Is the law sin? By no means! But I did not know sin except through the law; for I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, You shall not covet. But sin, seizing the opportunity through the commandment, produced in me every covetousness. For without the law sin is dead. I was once alive without the law; but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died; and the commandment which was for life was found to be for me unto death. For sin, seizing the opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. So the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Did what is good, then, become death to me? By no means! But sin, that it might appear as sin, produced death in me through what is good, so that sin might become sinful beyond measure through the commandment. For we know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under sin. For I do not know what I am doing; for I do not do what I want, but I do what I hate. But if I do what I do not want, I agree with the law, that it is good.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:16: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 7:7–16. The last clause in the digital text reads 'si autem quod uolo, hoc facio' ('if I do what I want'), apparently a slip for 'quod nolo'; translated following the sense of Rom 7:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.3 (CSEL 57:217–218; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-3).

## Letter 196.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-4
- Source: CSEL 57:218
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law is holy, but sin uses it to make those who rely on their own powers transgressors, so that grace may superabound.

### Latin text

Videmus itaque in his apostolicis uerbis legem non solum non esse peccatum, sed etiam esse sanctam et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum, quo dictum est: Non concupisces. sed peccatum per bonum fallit et per illud occidit eos, qui cum sint carnales, putant suis uiribus legem spiritalem se posse complere. et per hoc fiunt non solum peccatores, quod essent, etiam si legem non accepissent. sed etiam praeuaricatores, quod non essent. nisi legem accepissent sic enim alio loco dicit: Ubi lex non est. nec praeuaricatio. lex ergo subintrauit, sicut alibi ipse testatur, ut abundaret delictum; ubi autem abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia.

### English translation (Claude)

We see, then, in these apostolic words that the law is not only not sin but is holy, and the commandment by which it is said, 'You shall not covet', is holy and just and good. But sin deceives through what is good and through it kills those who, being carnal, think they can fulfil the spiritual law by their own powers; and through this they become not only sinners, which they would be even if they had not received the law, but also transgressors, which they would not be if they had not received the law. For so he says in another place: 'Where there is no law, there is no transgression.' 'So the law came in', as he testifies elsewhere, 'so that the trespass might abound; but where the trespass abounded, grace superabounded.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 4:15: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 7:12; Rom 4:15; Rom 5:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.4 (CSEL 57:218; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-4).

## Letter 196.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-5
- Source: CSEL 57:218–219
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The law shows our weakness by increasing desire; grace renews the inner self so that we do not follow our desires, though only in the resurrection will such desires cease.

### Latin text

Haec est igitur utilitas legis. quia ostendit hominem sibi. ipsum, ut sciat infirmitatem suam et uideat. quem ad modum per prohibitionem augeatur potius carnalis concupiscentia, quam sanetur. appetuntur enim ardentius. quae uetantur. dum id, quod spiritaliter iubetur, carnalis obseruare compellitur. ut autem sit spiritalis. qui legem impleat spiritalem. non fit ipsa lege sed gratia, hoc est non imperio sed beneficio, non iubente littera sed iuuante spiritu. incipit autem homo secundum gratiam in interiore homine renouari, ut mente agat, quod amat, nec carni consentiat agenti, quod odit, id est non ut omnino non concupiscat, sed ut post concupiscentias suas non eat. quod quidem tam magnum est, ut, si omni modo fieret et, quamuis insint, dum sumus in corpore mortis huius, desideria peccati, nulli tamen eorum adhiberemus adsensum, non esset, unde diceremus patri nostro, qui est in caelis: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. nec tamen ideo tales iam essemus, quales erimus, cum mortale hoc induerit inmortalitatem; tunc enim non solum nulli desiderio peccati oboediemus, sed nulla erunt desideria talia, quibus non oboedire iubeamur.

### English translation (Claude)

This, then, is the usefulness of the law: that it shows a person to himself, so that he may know his weakness and see how carnal concupiscence is increased rather than healed by prohibition. For forbidden things are desired more ardently, as long as one who is carnal is compelled to observe what is commanded spiritually. But one becomes spiritual, so as to fulfil the spiritual law, not by the law itself but by grace, that is, not by command but by benefit, not by the letter commanding but by the Spirit helping. A person begins, according to grace, to be renewed in the inner self, so as to do with the mind what he loves and not to consent to the flesh doing what he hates; that is, not so as not to covet at all, but so as not to go after his desires. This is indeed so great that, if it were done in every way, and, although the desires of sin are present while we are in the body of this death, we gave consent to none of them, there would be no reason for us to say to our Father who is in heaven, 'Forgive us our debts.' Yet we would not even then be such as we shall be when this mortal puts on immortality; for then we shall not only obey no desire of sin, but there will be no such desires for us to be commanded not to obey.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 7:24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 18:30 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 4:16; Sir 18:30 ('do not go after your desires'; extrabiblical on this site); Rom 7:24; Matt 6:9, 12; 1 Cor 15:53.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.5 (CSEL 57:218–219; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-5).

## Letter 196.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-6
- Source: CSEL 57:219–220
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: 'You shall not covet' sets a goal reached only by grace through faith; the law's use is to drive us to the medicine of grace in Christ.

### Latin text

Nunc ergo, ubi dicitur: Iam non ego operor illud sed id, quod in me habitat, peccatum, de concupiscentia carnis dicitur. quae operatur in nobis motus suos, etiam quando eis non oboedimus, dum non regnat peccatum in nostro mortali corpore ad oboediendum desideriis eius nec exhibemus membra nostra arma iniquitatis peccato. in qua iustitia nondum consummata perseueranter proficientes ad eius consummationem quandoque ueniemus, ubi peccati concupiscentia non cohibenda atque frenanda sed nulla sit. hoc enim lex posuit dicendo: Non concupisces, non quod hic ualeamus, sed ad quod proficiendo tendamus. uerum hoc fit non lege. quae hoc imperat, sed fide, quae hoc impetrat, non littera. qua iubetur, sed spiritu, quo donatur, non ergo meritis operantis hominis sed largientis gratia saluatoris. utilitas itaque legis est, ut hominem de sua infirmitate conuincat et gratiae medicinam, quae in Christo est, implorare compellat. omnis enim, qui inuocauerit nomen domini. saluus erit. quo modo ergo inuocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? quo modo credent, quem non audierunt? unde paulo post dicit: Igitur fides ex auditu. auditus autem per uerbum Christi.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, therefore, where it is said, 'It is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me', it is said of the concupiscence of the flesh, which produces its movements in us even when we do not obey them, as long as sin does not reign in our mortal body to make us obey its desires, and we do not present our members to sin as weapons of iniquity. In this righteousness, not yet completed, making persevering progress toward its completion, we shall at some time arrive where the concupiscence of sin is not to be restrained and bridled but does not exist at all. For the law set this when it said, 'You shall not covet', not as something we can do here, but as something toward which we strive by progressing. But this happens not by the law, which commands it, but by faith, which obtains it; not by the letter, by which it is commanded, but by the Spirit, by whom it is given; not, therefore, by the merits of the human being who works, but by the grace of the Saviour who bestows. So the usefulness of the law is that it convicts a person of his weakness and compels him to implore the medicine of grace, which is in Christ. 'For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. But how will they call on him in whom they have not believed? How will they believe him whom they have not heard?' Hence a little later he says: 'So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.'

### Scripture references

- Rom 7:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:13: allusion, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:13: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:14: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 7:17; Rom 6:12–13; Exod 20:17; Rom 10:13–14, 17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.6 (CSEL 57:219–220; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-6).

## Letter 196.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-7
- Source: CSEL 57:220–221
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Those who glory in the law without grace, whether Jews or Pelagians, refuse God's righteousness; the Pelagians thus Judaize in error, and their leaders have been excommunicated.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita sint, qui se Israhelitas esse carnaliter gaudent et praeter Christi gratiam in lege gloriantur, hi sunt, de quibus idem apostolus ait, quod ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti. dei quippe dixit iustitiam, quae homini ex deo est. suam uero, qua putant sibi sufficere ad facienda mandata sine adiutorio et dono eius, qui legem dedit. his autem similes sunt, qui cum profiteantur se esse Christianos, ipsi gratiae Christi sic aduersantur, ut se humanis uiribus diuina existiment implere mandata. ac sic etiam ipsi ignorantes dei iustitiam et suam uolentes constituere iustitiae dei non sunt subiecti et non quidem nomine sed tamen errore iudaizant. hoc genus hominum capita sibi inuenerat Pelagium et Caelestium impietatis huius assertores acerrimos, qui recenti iudicio dei per diligentes et fideles seruos eius etiam catholica communione priuati sunt et propter cor inpaenitens adhuc in sua damnatione persistunt.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, those who rejoice in being Israelites according to the flesh and glory in the law apart from the grace of Christ are those of whom the same apostle says that, ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God. He called God's righteousness that which comes to a person from God, and their own that by which they think they are sufficient to do the commandments without the help and gift of him who gave the law. Like them are those who, while professing to be Christians, so oppose the grace of Christ that they think they fulfil the divine commandments by human powers; and so they too, ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish their own, have not submitted to the righteousness of God, and Judaize, not indeed in name, but in error. This kind of people had found as their heads Pelagius and Caelestius, most vehement assertors of this ungodliness, who by the recent judgment of God, through his diligent and faithful servants, have been deprived even of Catholic communion and, because of an unrepentant heart, still persist in their condemnation.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:3: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:3; Rom 2:5. Augustine's comparison of the Pelagians with Judaism is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.7 (CSEL 57:220–221; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-7).

## Letter 196.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-8
- Source: CSEL 57:221
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: To avoid Judaizing one must drop the ceremonial observances, which were shadows, and keep the moral law of love, attributing all progress in it to grace.

### Latin text

Quisquis ab isto carnali et animali atque ideo non inmerito reprehensibili atque damnabili Iudaismo esse quaerit alienus. non solum ueteres illas obseruationes a se facere debet alienas. quae iam reuelato testamento nouo, posteaquam uenerunt ea. quae per illas significabantur esse uentura, procul dubio esse necessaria destiterunt, ut non iudicetur in cibo et in potu et in parte diei festi et neomeniae et sabbatorum. quod est umbra futurorum. uerum etiam illa, quae in lege ita praecepta sunt. ut ualeant ad informandos mores fidelium. id est abnegantes impietatem et saeculares cupiditates temperanter et iuste et pie uiuamus in hoc saeculo, unde est etiam hoc, quod ex lege maxime commendandum elegit apostolus: Non concupisces, et quaecumque de deo et proximo diligendo sine ullis figuris sacramentorum praecipiuntur in lege, in quibus duobus praeceptis etiam ipse dominus Christus dicit totam legem prophetasque pendere. sic accipit, sic amplectitur, sic obseruanda esse non dubitat. ut, quicquid in eis proficit, non sibi tribuat sed gratiae dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum.

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever seeks to be a stranger to this carnal and natural, and therefore not undeservedly reprehensible and condemnable, Judaism must not only make himself a stranger to those old observances, which, now that the new covenant has been revealed and the things they signified as to come have come, have beyond doubt ceased to be necessary, so that no one is to be judged in food and drink, or in the matter of a festival or new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come; but also those things commanded in the law in such a way as to serve to form the conduct of believers, that is, 'that, denying ungodliness and worldly desires, we may live soberly, justly and godly in this world', from which comes also this, which the apostle chose to commend above all from the law, 'You shall not covet', and whatever is commanded in the law about loving God and neighbour without any figures of sacraments, on which two commandments the Lord Christ himself says the whole law and the prophets hang: these he so accepts, so embraces, so does not doubt must be observed, that whatever progress he makes in them he attributes not to himself but to the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:16: quotation, high confidence
- Col 2:17: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 2:12: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:16–17; Titus 2:12; Exod 20:17; Matt 22:40. Augustine's characterization of 'carnal' Judaism is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.8 (CSEL 57:221; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-8).

## Letter 196.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-9
- Source: CSEL 57:221–222
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: A Christian may be called a Jew or Israelite only spiritually, as Paul's 'Jew inwardly' in Rom 2 shows, but should not use the name in ordinary speech.

### Latin text

Verum tamen cum quisque isto modo fuerit uerus germanusque Christianus. utrum etiam Iudaeus uel Israhelita dicendus sit, merito quaeritur. quod quidem si non carne sed spiritu hoc esse intellegitur, non debet ipsum nomen sibi in consuetudine sermonis inponere, sed spiritali intellegentia retinere. ne propter ambiguitatem uocabuli, quam non discernit cotidiana locutio, illud profiteri uideatur, quod est inimicum nomini Christiano. hanc autem quaestionem, id est utrum. qui Christianus est, etiam Iudaeus uel Israhelita possit intellegi, idem beatus nobis aperit et dissoluit apostolus, ubi dicit: Circumcisio quidem prodest, si legem custodias: si autem praeuaricator legis sis, circumcisio tua praeputium facta est. si igitur praeputium iustitias legis custodiat, nonne praeputium eius in circumcisionem reputabitur et iudicabit, quod ex natura est, praeputium legem perficiens te, qui per litteram et circumcisionem praeuaricator legis es? non enim, qui in manifesto, Iudaeus est neque, quae in manifesta carne, est circumcisio. sed qui in abscondito Iudaeus est et circumcisione cordis. qui spiritu non littera, cuius laus non ex hominibus sed ex deo. cum igitur audiamus apostolum Christi commendantem nobis Iudaeum in abscondito non carnis circumcisione sed cordis et spiritu non littera, quis est iste nisi Christianus?

### English translation (Claude)

But when someone has become a true and genuine Christian in this way, it is rightly asked whether he should also be called a Jew or an Israelite. If this is understood to be so not in the flesh but in the spirit, he ought not to apply the name itself to himself in ordinary speech, but keep it in spiritual understanding, lest, because of the ambiguity of the word, which everyday speech does not distinguish, he seem to profess what is hostile to the Christian name. This question, namely whether one who is a Christian can also be understood to be a Jew or an Israelite, the same blessed apostle opens and solves for us, where he says: 'Circumcision indeed is of value if you keep the law; but if you are a transgressor of the law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. If, then, an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision? And will not he who is by nature uncircumcised, fulfilling the law, judge you, who with the letter and circumcision are a transgressor of the law? For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart, in spirit, not in letter; his praise is not from men but from God.' When, then, we hear the apostle of Christ commending to us a Jew inwardly, by circumcision not of the flesh but of the heart, in spirit not in letter, who is this but a Christian?

### Scripture references

- Rom 2:25: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:26: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:27: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 2:25–29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.9 (CSEL 57:221–222; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-9).

## Letter 196.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-10
- Source: CSEL 57:222–224
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christians are Jews spiritually as they are Abraham's offspring by faith, as Paul argues in Romans 4 and Galatians 3.

### Latin text

Sic itaque sumus Iudaei non carnaliter sed spiritaliter, quem ad modum sumus semen Abrahae non secundum carnem sicut illi, qui de ipso nomine carnali superbia gloriantur, sed secundum spiritum fidei, quod non illi. scimus enim nos fuisse promissos, quando ei dixit deus: Patrem multarum gentium posui te. et quam multa de hac re dicat apostolus, nouimus. dicimus enim, inquit. quoniam deputata est Abrahae fides ad iustitiam. quo modo ergo deputata est? cum in circumcisione esset, an cum esset in praeputio? non in circumcisione sed in praeputio. et signum accepit circumcisionis, signaculum iustitiae fidei. quae est in praeputio, ut sit pater omnium credentium per praeputium, ut deputetur et illis ad iustitiam. ut sit pater circumcisionis his, qui non solum ex circumcisione sunt. sed et his, qui sequuntur uestigia, quae est in praeputio, fidei patris nostri Abraham. et paulo post: Ideo, inquit, ex fide, ut secundum gratiam firma sit promissio omni semini, non ei tantum, quod ex lege est, sed et ei, quod ex fide est Abraham, qui est pater omnium nostrum, sicut scriptum est: Quia patrem multarum gentium posui te. item ad Galatas: Sicut Abraham, inquit, credidit deo et deputatum est illi ad iustitiam. intellegite ergo. quoniam. qui ex fide, hi sunt filii Abraham. prouidens autem scriptura. quia ex fide iustificat gentes deus. praenuntiauit Abrahae. quia benedicentur in te omnes gentes, ita ut, qui ex fide sunt, benedicantur cum fideli Abraham. iam aliquanto post in eadem epistula: Fratres, inquit. secundum hominem dico; tamen hominis confirmatum testamentum nemo inritum facit aut superordinat. Abrahae dictae sunt promissiones et semini eius. non dicit et seminibus tamquam in multis. sed tamquam in uno et semini tuo, quod est Christus. item paulo post: Omnes enim uos, inquit, unum estis in Christo Iesu: si autem uos Christi. ergo Abrahae semen estis secundum promissionem heredes.

### English translation (Claude)

So we are Jews, not carnally but spiritually, just as we are the offspring of Abraham, not according to the flesh, like those who glory in that very name with carnal pride, but according to the spirit of faith, which they are not. For we know that we were promised when God said to him, 'I have made you the father of many nations.' And we know how much the apostle says on this matter. 'For we say', he says, 'that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness. How then was it counted? When he was circumcised, or when he was uncircumcised? Not when circumcised, but when uncircumcised. And he received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while uncircumcised, so that he might be the father of all who believe while uncircumcised, so that righteousness might be counted to them too, and the father of circumcision to those who are not only of the circumcision but who also follow the footsteps of the faith which our father Abraham had while uncircumcised.' And a little later: 'Therefore', he says, 'it is by faith, so that the promise may be firm according to grace for all the offspring, not only for that which is of the law, but also for that which is of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, as it is written: I have made you the father of many nations.' Likewise to the Galatians: 'Just as Abraham', he says, 'believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness. Know therefore that those who are of faith are the sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God justifies the Gentiles by faith, announced beforehand to Abraham that in you all nations will be blessed, so that those who are of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.' And somewhat later in the same letter: 'Brothers,' he says, 'I speak in human terms: even a man's covenant, once ratified, no one annuls or adds to. The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, and to offsprings, as of many, but as of one, and to your offspring, which is Christ.' Again a little later: 'For you are all one in Christ Jesus; and if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise.'

### Scripture references

- Gen 17:5: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:9: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:16: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:17: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:6: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:8: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:9: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 15:6: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 12:3: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:28: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 17:5; Rom 4:9–12, 16–17; Gal 3:6–9 (Gen 15:6; Gen 12:3); Gal 3:15–16; Gal 3:28–29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.10 (CSEL 57:222–224; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-10).

## Letter 196.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-11
- Source: CSEL 57:224–225
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jews who do not believe in Christ are not Abraham's sons in Paul's sense, while believing Gentiles are spiritual Jews and Israelites grafted into the olive tree.

### Latin text

Secundum istum ergo intellectum apostolicum inueniuntur Iudaei, qui Christiani non sunt, cum ex carne Abrahae originem ducant, non esse filii Abrahae. cum enim dicit: Intellegite ergo, quoniam, qui ex fide. hi sunt filii Abrahae, profecto significat eos, qui ex fide non sint. non esse filios Abrahae. ac per hoc, nisi Iudaeis eo modo sit pater Abraham, quo modo est nobis. quid eis prodest, quod de carne eius exorti sunt et nomen sine uirtute tenuerunt? cum autem ad Christum transeunt et incipiunt esse ex fide filii Abrahae, tunc erunt Iudaei non in manifesto sed in abscondito, circumcisione cordis, spiritu non littera, quorum laus non sit ex hominibus sed ex deo. ab hac autem fide alienati in ramis fractis deputabuntur ex illa olea. in cuius radicem idem dicit apostolus inseri oleastrum, id est gentes, quod utique non fit per carnem sed per fidem nec per legem sed per gratiam nec per litteram sed per spiritum nec carnis circumcisione sed cordis nec in manifesto sed in abscondito nec laude ex hominibus sed ex deo, ut sit unusquisque Christianus sicut non carnalis sed spiritalis Abrahae filius ita non carnalis sed spiritalis Iudaeus nec carnalis sed spiritalis Israhelita. nam et de isto nomine sic apostolus loquitur: Non enim omnes, qui ex Israhel, hi sunt Israhel neque, quia sunt semen Abraham. omnes filii: sed in Isaac uocabitur tibi semen, hoc est non hi, qui filii carnis, hi filii dei, sed filii promissionis deputantur in semen. nonne mirabilia magna sunt ista profundumque mysterium, ut multi ex Israhel nati non sint Israhel et multi non sint filii, cum sint semen Abrahae? quo modo enim non sunt, quo modo nos sumus, nisi quia non sunt filii promissionis ad Christi gratiam pertinentes sed filii carnis nomen inane gestantes? ac per hoc nec illi sunt Israhel, sicut sumus nos, nec nos sumus Israhel, sicut sunt illi. nos enim sumus secundum spiritalem regenerationem, illi secundum carnalem generationem.

### English translation (Claude)

According to this apostolic understanding, then, Jews who are not Christians, though they draw their origin from the flesh of Abraham, are found not to be sons of Abraham. For when he says, 'Know therefore that those who are of faith are the sons of Abraham', he certainly means that those who are not of faith are not sons of Abraham. And therefore, unless Abraham is father to the Jews in the way he is to us, what does it profit them that they have sprung from his flesh and have kept the name without the reality? But when they pass over to Christ and begin to be sons of Abraham by faith, then they will be Jews not outwardly but inwardly, by circumcision of the heart, in spirit not letter, whose praise is not from men but from God. But if estranged from this faith, they will be counted among the broken branches of that olive tree into whose root, the same apostle says, the wild olive, that is, the Gentiles, is grafted; which certainly happens not through the flesh but through faith, not through the law but through grace, not through the letter but through the Spirit, not by circumcision of the flesh but of the heart, not outwardly but inwardly, not with praise from men but from God; so that every Christian, as he is not a carnal but a spiritual son of Abraham, so is not a carnal but a spiritual Jew, and not a carnal but a spiritual Israelite. For of this name too the apostle speaks thus: 'For not all who are from Israel are Israel, nor, because they are the offspring of Abraham, are they all sons; but in Isaac your offspring will be called; that is, not those who are children of the flesh are children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.' Are these not great wonders and a deep mystery, that many born of Israel are not Israel, and many are not sons, though they are the offspring of Abraham? How are they not, how are we, except that they are not children of the promise belonging to the grace of Christ, but children of the flesh bearing an empty name? And so neither are they Israel as we are, nor are we Israel as they are; for we are so according to spiritual regeneration, they according to carnal generation.

### Scripture references

- Gal 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:29: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 11:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 3:7; Rom 2:28–29; Rom 11:17–24; Rom 9:6–8. Augustine's statements about Jews are translated as written; they concern spiritual descent in Paul's argument.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.11 (CSEL 57:224–225; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-11).

## Letter 196.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-12
- Source: CSEL 57:225–226
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: In Paul's allegory of Sarah and Hagar, Christians belong spiritually to Sarah and the free Jerusalem, while carnal Israel belongs to Hagar.

### Latin text

Intuendum est quippe ac discernendum alium esse Israhel. qui propter carnem nomen accepit, alium uero, qui propter spiritum rem, quae illo nomine significatur, obtinuit. numquid enim ex Agar, ancilla Sarrae, nati sunt Israhelitae? nonne Ismahel ex illa natus est et non Israhelitarum sed Ismahelitarum gentem suo semine propagauit? de Sarra autem uenit Israhel per Isaac, qui ex promissione natus est Abrahae. tamen cum secundum propaginem carnis se ita res habeat. uenitur ad intellectum spiritalem et inueniuntur ad Sarram non pertinere carnales Israhelitae, qui ex illa carnis originem ducunt, et pertinere ad eam potius Christiani, qui non secundum Ismahel filii sunt carnis, sed secundum Isaac filii sunt promissionis non ad ipsius Isaac carnale semen sed ad spiritale mysterium pertinentes. ita quippe ad Galatas apostolus loquitur: Dicite mihi: sub lege uolentes esse legem non audistis? scriptum est enim, quod Abraham duos filios habuit, unum de ancilla et unum de libera. sed ille quidem, qui de ancilla, secundum carnem natus est, qui autem de libera, per repromissionem. quae sint in allegoria. haec enim sunt duo testamenta, unum quidem a monte Sina in seruitutem generans, quod est Agar; Sina enim mons est in Arabia, quae coniuncta est huic, quae nunc est Hierusalem; seruit enim cum filiis suis. quae autem sursum est Hierusalem, libera est: quae est mater nostra. scriptum est enim: Laetare sterilis, quae non paris, erumpe et exclama, quae non parturis, quia multi filii desertae magis quam eius, quae habet uirum. nos autem, fratres, secundum Isaac promissionis filii sumus. sed sicut tunc, qui secundum carnem natus fuerat, persequebatur eum, qui secundum spiritum, ita et nunc. sed quid dicit scriptura? eice ancillam et filium eius; non enim heres erit filius ancillae cum filio liberae. nos autem, fratres, non sumus ancillae filii sed liberae; qua libertate Christus nos liberauit.

### English translation (Claude)

For we must notice and distinguish that one Israel received the name because of the flesh, and another obtained, because of the Spirit, the reality signified by that name. Were the Israelites born of Hagar, Sarah's slave woman? Was not Ishmael born of her, and did he not propagate by his offspring the nation not of the Israelites but of the Ishmaelites? But from Sarah came Israel through Isaac, who was born to Abraham by promise. Yet although this is how matters stand according to the descent of the flesh, one comes to the spiritual understanding and finds that the carnal Israelites, who draw their fleshly origin from her, do not belong to Sarah, and that Christians rather belong to her, who are not children of the flesh like Ishmael, but children of the promise like Isaac, belonging not to the carnal offspring of Isaac himself but to the spiritual mystery. For thus the apostle speaks to the Galatians: 'Tell me, you who want to be under the law, have you not heard the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and one by the free woman. But the son of the slave was born according to the flesh, the son of the free woman through promise. These things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants, one from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery, which is Hagar; for Sinai is a mountain in Arabia, which corresponds to the present Jerusalem; for she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free, which is our mother. For it is written: Rejoice, barren one who does not bear; break forth and cry out, you who are not in labour; for the children of the desolate one are more than of her who has a husband. Now we, brothers, are children of the promise like Isaac. But just as then the one born according to the flesh persecuted the one born according to the Spirit, so it is now. But what does the Scripture say? Cast out the slave woman and her son; for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman. So, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman but of the free; with that freedom Christ has set us free.'

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:21: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:22: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:23: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:24: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:25: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:26: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:27: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 54:1: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:28: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:29: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:30: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 21:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:31: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:1: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 4:21–31 (Isa 54:1; Gen 21:10); Gal 5:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.12 (CSEL 57:225–226; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-12).

## Letter 196.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-13
- Source: CSEL 57:226–227
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Spiritually, Christians belong to Sarah and Jacob-Israel, while unbelieving Jews belong to Hagar and Esau, so that 'the elder will serve the younger'.

### Latin text

Ecce secundum istam spiritalem atque apostolicam intellegentiam nos potius pertinemus ad liberam Sarram, qui ex illa nullam carnis propaginem trahimus; Iudaei autem, qui ex illa carnis propaginem trahunt, ad Agar potius ancillam pertinere monstrantur, de qua carnis propaginem non trahunt. in nepotibus etiam Abrahae et Sarrae, id est filiis Isaac et Rebeccae, illis geminis Esau et Iacob, qui postea uocatus est Israhel. hoc ipsum magnum et profundum mysterium reperitur. de quo idem apostolus loquens cum per Isaac promissionis filios commemorasset ad Christi gratiam pertinentes: Non solum autem, inquit, sed et Rebecca ex uno concubitu habens Isaac patris nostri. nondum enim natis nec qui egerint aliquid boni aut mali, ut secundum electionem propositum dei maneret, non ex operibus sed ex uocante dictum est ei, quia maior seruiet minori, sicut scriptum est: Iacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui. haec certe doctrina apostolica atque catholica satis euidenter indicat nobis secundum originem carnis ad Sarram Iudaeos, id est Israhelitas, ad Agar uero Ismahelitas pertinere; secundum autem mysterium spiritus ad Sarram Christianos, ad Agar Iudaeos; item secundum originem carnis ad Esau, qui dictus est etiam Edom, gentem Idumaeorum, ad Iacob autem, qui dictus est etiam Israhel, gentem Iudaeorum; porro secundum mysterium spiritus ad Esau Iudaeos, ad Israhel pertinere Christianos. ita quippe impletur, quod scriptum est: Maior seruiet minori, id est prior natus populus Iudaeorum posteriori nato populo Christianorum. ecce quem ad modum sumus Israhel adoptione diuina non humana cognatione gloriantes nec in manifesto sed in occulto nec littera sed spiritu nec carnis sed cordis circumcisione Iudaei.

### English translation (Claude)

See, according to this spiritual and apostolic understanding, we rather belong to the free woman Sarah, though we draw no fleshly descent from her; while the Jews, who draw fleshly descent from her, are shown rather to belong to the slave Hagar, from whom they do not draw fleshly descent. In the grandchildren too of Abraham and Sarah, that is, the sons of Isaac and Rebecca, in those twins Esau and Jacob, who was later called Israel, this same great and deep mystery is found. Speaking of it the same apostle, after he had mentioned the children of the promise belonging to the grace of Christ through Isaac, says: 'And not only so, but also Rebecca, having conceived from one act of intercourse with our father Isaac. For when they were not yet born and had done nothing good or evil, so that God's purpose according to election might stand, not from works but from him who calls, it was said to her that the elder will serve the younger, as it is written: Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.' This apostolic and Catholic teaching certainly shows us clearly enough that according to the origin of the flesh the Jews, that is, the Israelites, belong to Sarah, and the Ishmaelites to Hagar; but according to the mystery of the Spirit, Christians belong to Sarah and Jews to Hagar; likewise according to the origin of the flesh the nation of the Idumaeans belongs to Esau, who was also called Edom, and the nation of the Jews to Jacob, who was also called Israel; but according to the mystery of the Spirit the Jews belong to Esau and Christians to Israel. For so is fulfilled what is written, 'The elder will serve the younger', that is, the people of the Jews, born first, will serve the people of the Christians, born later. See how we are Israel, glorying in divine adoption, not human kinship, and Jews not outwardly but inwardly, not in letter but in spirit, not by circumcision of the flesh but of the heart.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:10: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:11: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:13: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 25:23: quotation, high confidence
- Mal 1:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:29: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:10–13 (Gen 25:23; Mal 1:2–3); Rom 2:28–29. Augustine's typology is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.13 (CSEL 57:226–227; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-13).

## Letter 196.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-14
- Source: CSEL 57:227–228
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Christians should not call themselves Jews or Israelites in ordinary speech, since the apostles, who knew the spiritual sense, kept those names for Abraham's physical descendants.

### Latin text

Quae cum ita se habeant, non tamen debemus consuetudinem sermonis humani inepta loquacitate confundere et in rebus discernendis frequentata uocabula perturbata significatione miscere, ut eos, qui, cum Christiani sunt, et appellatione usitatissima Christiani uocantur, inusitato uocabulo aliquis affectet appellare Iudaeos uel, cum sit ipse uoceturque christianus, Israhelitae potius nomine delectetur et, quod in mysterio debet semper intellegere, parcius autem ore proferre, hoc in cotidiana loquendi consuetudine magis eligat frequentare inepta insolentia et, si dici potest, inperita scientia. numquid enim apostoli, per quos ea didicimus, ista nesciebant, quo modo nos potius simus semen Abrahae secundum Isaac promissionis heredes et Iudaei spiritu non littera, cordis circumcisione non carnis et non secundum carnem Israhel sed Israhel dei? sciebant utique ista multo sapientius certiusque quam nos et tamen in loquendi consuetudine Iudaeos et Israhelitas eos appellabant, qui secundum carnem de Abrahae stirpe uenientes ab omnibus uocitabantur hoc nomine.

### English translation (Claude)

This being so, however, we ought not to confuse the usage of human speech with silly talkativeness and, in distinguishing things, mix up familiar words with confused meanings, so that someone would affect to call by an unusual word 'Jews' those who, being Christians, are called Christians by the most customary name; or, though he himself is and is called a Christian, would rather delight in the name of Israelite, and would choose to use frequently in everyday speech, with silly arrogance and, if it can be said, unskilled knowledge, what he ought always to understand in mystery but utter more sparingly with the mouth. For did not the apostles, through whom we have learned these things, know them: how we are rather the offspring of Abraham, heirs of the promise like Isaac, and Jews in spirit not letter, by circumcision of the heart not of the flesh, and not Israel according to the flesh but the Israel of God? They certainly knew these things much more wisely and certainly than we; and yet in the usage of speech they called Jews and Israelites those who, coming from the stock of Abraham according to the flesh, were called by this name by everyone.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:28: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:18: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 6:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 4:28; Rom 2:29; 1 Cor 10:18; Gal 6:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.14 (CSEL 57:227–228; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-14).

## Letter 196.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-15
- Source: CSEL 57:228–229
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Paul's own usage, distinguishing Jews, Greeks and the Church and calling himself an Israelite by descent, shows that 'Jew' and 'Israel' properly name physical descendants.

### Latin text

Iudaei signa petunt, ait apostolus Paulus, et Graeci sapientiam quaerunt; nos autem praedicamus Christum crucifixum, Iudaeis quidem scandalum, gentibus autem stultitiam, ipsis autem uocatis Iudaeis et Graecis Christum dei uirtutem et dei sapientiam. quos dixit Graecos, hos etiam gentium nomine significauit eo, quod haec lingua maxime excellit in gentibus; Iudaeos tamen ipsos uocauit, quos omnes hoc nomine appellant. nam si Christiani ipsi sunt Iudaei, Christianis est ergo scandalum Christus crucifixus, de quo dictum est: Iudaeis quidem scandalum. quis hoc nisi insanissimus sentiat? item dicit: Sine offensione estote Iudaeis et Graecis et ecclesiae dei. quo modo ista distingueret, si et ecclesiam dei in cotidiana loquendi consuetudine Iudaeos appellare deberet? item ait: Quos et uocauit nos non solum ex Iudaeis sed etiam ex gentibus. quo modo uocauit ex Iudaeis, si potius ex non Iudaeis uocauit, ut essent Iudaei? item de Israhelitis: Quid ergo dicemus? inquit; quia gentes, quae non sectabantur iustitiam, adprehenderunt iustitiam, iustitiam autem, quae ex fide est. Israhel autem persequens legem iustitiae in legem non peruenit. quare? quia non ex fide sed quasi ex operibus; offenderunt enim in lapidem offensionis. item: Ad Israhel autem quid dicit? tota die extendi manus meas ad populum non credentem et contradicentem. et secutus adiunxit: Dico ergo: Numquid reppulit deus plebem suam? absit. nam et ego Israhelita sum ex semine Abraham, tribu Beniamin. non reppulit deus plebem suam, quam praesciuit. quo modo hic appellauit apostolus Israhel non credentem et contradicentem, si Christiani sunt Israhel, uel quo modo se appellauit Israhelitam? numquid ex eo, quod Christianus factus erat? non utique sed ex eo, quod secundum carnem fuerat ex semine Abraham, tribu Beniamin, quod non sumus nos secundum carnem, quamuis secundum fidem sumus semen Abrahae ac per hoc et Israhel. sed aliud est, quod agnoscit altioris intellegentia sacramenti, aliud, quod exposcit cotidiana consuetudo uocabuli.

### English translation (Claude)

'Jews ask for signs', says the apostle Paul, 'and Greeks seek wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.' Those he called Greeks he also signified by the name of Gentiles, because this language is most eminent among the Gentiles; yet he called Jews those whom everyone calls by this name. For if Christians themselves are Jews, then Christ crucified is a stumbling block to Christians, of whom it is said, 'a stumbling block to Jews'. Who but a complete madman would think so? Again he says: 'Give no offence to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God.' How would he distinguish these if he ought to call the church of God too 'Jews' in everyday usage? Again he says: 'Us whom he has called not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles.' How did he call from the Jews, if he rather called from non-Jews so that they might be Jews? Again, of the Israelites: 'What then shall we say?' he says; 'That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, took hold of righteousness, the righteousness that is by faith; but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, did not attain to the law. Why? Because they pursued it not by faith but as if by works; for they stumbled over the stone of stumbling.' Again: 'But to Israel what does he say? All day long I have stretched out my hands to a people unbelieving and contradicting.' And he went on to add: 'I say then: Has God rejected his people? By no means! For I too am an Israelite, from the offspring of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew.' How did the apostle here call Israel unbelieving and contradicting, if Christians are Israel? Or how did he call himself an Israelite? Was it because he had become a Christian? Certainly not, but because according to the flesh he was from the offspring of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin, which we are not according to the flesh, although according to faith we are the offspring of Abraham and therefore also Israel. But it is one thing that the understanding of a higher mystery recognizes, another that everyday usage of the word demands.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:22: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:24: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:24: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:30: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:31: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:32: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:21: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 65:2: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:1: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 1:22–24; 1 Cor 10:32; Rom 9:24; Rom 9:30–32; Rom 10:21 (Isa 65:2); Rom 11:1–2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.15 (CSEL 57:228–229; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-15).

## Letter 196.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-16
- Source: CSEL 57:229–231
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Aptus, who calls himself a Jew and urges Christians to keep the food laws, does so carnally; Christians keep the moral law by grace and hold the names Jew and Israel only in the spiritual sense.

### Latin text

Denique Aptus iste nescio quis, de quo scripsisti, quod doceat iudaizare Christianos, eo modo se, sicut insinuauit sanctitas tua, Iudaeum et Israhelitam uocat, ut ab eis escis prohibeat, quas pro temporis illius congruentia lex per sanctum famulum dei Moysen data prohibebat, et ceteras illius temporis obseruationes iam nunc apud Christianos abolitas remotasque persuadeat, quas umbras futurorum appellat apostolus, ut et prophetia in illis intellegatur et earum obseruatio iam euacuata monstretur. unde apparet, quare se iste Aptus uelit Israhelitam Iudaeumque uocitari non spiritaliter sed omnino carnaliter. nos autem nec illis obseruationibus, quae nouo testamento reuelato euacuatae sunt, tenemur obstricti et praecepta legis huic etiam tempori necessaria, qualia sunt: Non adulterabis, non homicidium facies, non concupisces. et si quod est aliud mandatum, quod in hoc sermone recapitulatur: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum, non uiribus humanis quasi nostram constituentes iustitiam sed gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum in ea iustitia, quae nobis ab illo est, obseruanda esse didicimus et docemus. nec tamen ideo nos negamus semen Abrahae, quibus dicit apostolus: Vos ergo Abrahae semen estis, aut Iudaeos in abscondito, de qualibus idem dicit: Non enim. qui in manifesto, Iudaeus est neque. quae in manifesto in carne, est circumcisio, sed qui in abscondito Iudaeus est et circumcisione cordis, qui spiritu non littera, cuius laus non ex hominibus sed ex deo est, aut Israhelitas spiritales ad eum scilicet pertinentes, cui minori praedictum est seruiturum esse maiorem. sed haec uocabula nobis non indecenter inponimus eaque mysteriorum intellegentia continemus, non uerborum insolentia uentilamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, this Aptus, whoever he is, of whom you wrote that he teaches Christians to Judaize, calls himself a Jew and an Israelite, as Your Holiness indicated, in such a way as to forbid them foods which the law given through the holy servant of God Moses forbade as suited to that time, and to urge the other observances of that time, now abolished and removed among Christians, which the apostle calls shadows of things to come, so that prophecy may be understood in them and their observance be shown to be now made void. From this it is clear why this Aptus wants to be called an Israelite and a Jew, not spiritually but wholly carnally. But we are not bound by those observances which have been made void by the revelation of the new covenant; and the precepts of the law necessary also for this time, such as 'You shall not commit adultery, you shall not kill, you shall not covet', and any other commandment summed up in this word, 'You shall love your neighbour as yourself', we have learned and teach are to be observed, not by human powers as if establishing our own righteousness, but by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, in the righteousness which is ours from him. Yet we do not therefore deny that we are the offspring of Abraham, to whom the apostle says, 'You then are Abraham's offspring', or Jews inwardly, of whom the same apostle says, 'For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh, but he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart, in spirit not letter, whose praise is not from men but from God', or spiritual Israelites, belonging, that is, to the younger, whom it was foretold the elder would serve. But we do not apply these names to ourselves inappropriately; we keep them in the understanding of the mysteries and do not bandy them about in unusual speech.

### Scripture references

- Col 2:17: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 13:9: quotation, high confidence
- Exod 20:14: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 19:18: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 10:3: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 3:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 3:29: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:28: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 2:29: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 25:23: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 2:17; Rom 13:9 (Exod 20:13–17; Lev 19:18); Rom 10:3; Phil 3:9; Gal 3:29; Rom 2:28–29; Gen 25:23. Nothing further is known of Aptus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 196.16 (CSEL 57:229–231; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-196-16).

## Letter 197.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-1
- Source: CSEL 57:231–232
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Hesychius Jerome's expositions of the prophecies, holding that Daniel's weeks refer to past events and that the time of Christ's return cannot be calculated.

### Latin text

Ad sanctitatem tuam filio tuo conpresbytero nostro remeante Cornuto, per quem litteras tuae uenerationis accepi, quibus exiguitatem meam uisitare dignatus es, tandem rescripta persoluo et debitum resalutationis obsequium multum me commendans acceptissimis domino precibus tuis. domine frater. de propheticis autem dictis, saepe praedictis, de quibus uoluisti ut aliquid scriberem, melius mihi uisum est sancti Hieronymi. hominis doctissimi, expositiones eorundem uerborum, ne illas forte non habeas, de opusculis eius excerptas dirigere beatitudini tuae. si autem iam eas habebas nec inquisitioni tuae satisfaciebant, quid de his sentias, peto mihi rescribere non graueris, et quem ad modum ipse eadem prophetica oracula intellegas. ego enim maxime illud de hebdomadibus Danihelis secundum tempus, quod iam transactum est, intellegendum puto; nam de saluatoris aduentu, qui expectatur in fine, tempora dinumerare non audeo nec aliquem prophetam de hac re numerum annorum existimo praefinisse sed illud potius: praeualere, quod ipse dominus ait: Nemo potest cognoscere tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate.

### English translation (Claude)

Now that our fellow presbyter Cornutus, your son, is returning to Your Holiness (through him I received the letter of Your Reverence, in which you were good enough to visit my littleness), I at last pay my reply and the duty I owe of returning your greeting, commending myself earnestly to your prayers, which are most acceptable to the Lord, my lord brother. As for the prophetic sayings, often foretold, about which you wished me to write something, it seemed better to me to send Your Blessedness the expositions of those same words by the holy Jerome, a most learned man, excerpted from his works, in case you happen not to have them. But if you already had them and they did not satisfy your inquiry, I ask you not to mind writing back to me what you think of them, and how you yourself understand these same prophetic oracles. For my part, I think that the passage about the weeks of Daniel above all should be understood of the time that has already passed; for as to the coming of the Savior, which is awaited at the end, I do not dare to count up the times, and I do not think that any prophet set out the number of years in advance on this matter, but rather that what the Lord himself said holds good: “No one can know the times which the Father has put in his own power.”

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Hesychius, bishop of Salona (named in the Retractations). The quotation is Acts 1:7 in Augustine's wording (“no one can know” rather than “it is not yours to know”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 197.1 (CSEL 57:231–232; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-1).

## Letter 197.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-2
- Source: CSEL 57:232–233
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Christ's words in Acts 1:7 forbid calculating even the times, explaining the difference between the Greek words chronos and kairos.

### Latin text

Quod enim alio loco ait: De die autem et hora nemo scit, sunt qui sic accipiunt, ut putent se posse tempora computare; diem uero tantum modo ipsum et horam neminem scire. ubi omitto dicere, quem ad modum soleant scripturae diem uel horam etiam pro tempore ponere. sed certe illud de ignorantia temporum apertissime dictum est. nam cum dominus hinc interrogatus esset a discipulis suis: Nemo. inquit, potest cognoscere tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate. non enim dixit diem uel horam sed tempora, quae in breui spatio non solent dici sicut dies uel hora, maxime si Graecum intueamur eloquium, ex qua lingua in nostram eundem librum, ubi hoc scriptum est, scimus esse translatum, quamuis Latine satis exprimi non potuerit. ibi enim Graece legitur χρόνους ἢ ϰαιρούς. nostri autem utrumque hoc uerbum tempora appellant siue χρόνους siue ϰαιρούς. cum habeant haec duo inter se non neglegendam differentiam. ϰαιρούςquippe appellant Graeci tempora quidem, non tamen quae in spatiorum uoluminibus transeunt, sed quae in rebus ad aliquid importunis uel opportunis sentiuntur sicut messis. uindemia, calor, frigus, pax, bellum et si qua similia; χρόνους autem ipsa spatia temporum uocant.

### English translation (Claude)

For as to what he says in another place, “But of the day and hour no one knows,” there are some who take it in such a way that they think they can compute the times, and that only the very day and hour are known to no one. Here I pass over how the Scriptures commonly use “day” or “hour” also for a time. But at any rate what was said about our ignorance of the times was said most plainly. For when the Lord was questioned on this by his disciples, he said: “No one can know the times which the Father has put in his own power.” He did not say “the day” or “the hour” but “the times,” a word not usually used of a brief space, as “day” or “hour” are; especially if we look at the Greek expression, the language from which, as we know, the very book in which this is written was translated into ours, although it could not be adequately expressed in Latin. For there in Greek one reads chronous ē kairous (χρόνους ἢ καιρούς). But our people call both these words “times,” whether chronous or kairous, although they have a difference between them that should not be neglected. The Greeks call kairous “times,” it is true, but not those that pass by in the rolling course of spans, but those that are felt in things as unseasonable or seasonable for something, such as harvest, vintage, heat, cold, peace, war, and anything similar; whereas they call the very spans of time chronous.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:36: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:36 (cf. Mark 13:32) and Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 197.2 (CSEL 57:232–233; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-2).

## Letter 197.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-3
- Source: CSEL 57:233
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the apostles asked about the opportune time for the kingdom, and that computing the date of the end is wanting to know what Christ said no one can know.

### Latin text

Et certe hoc ipsi apostoli non ita quaesiuerunt, quasi unum nouissimum diem uel horam, id est exiguam diei partem scire uoluissent, sed utrum iam esset opportunum tempus, quo regnum repraesentaretur Israhel. tunc audierunt: Nemo potest cognoscere tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, id est χρόνους ἢ ϰαιρούς. quod si Latine diceretur tempora aut opportunitates, nec sic, quod dictum est, esset expressum, quia, siue opportuna siue importuna sint tempora. ϰαιροὶ dicuntur. tempora ergo computare, hoc est χρόνους,ut sciamus, quando sit finis huius saeculi uel aduentus domini, nihil mihi aliud uidetur quam scire uelle, quod ipse ait scire neminem posse.

### English translation (Claude)

And certainly the apostles did not ask this as though they had wanted to know a single last day or hour, that is, a small part of a day, but whether the opportune time had already come in which the kingdom should be restored to Israel. Then they heard: “No one can know the times which the Father has put in his own power,” that is, chronous ē kairous. Even if it were said in Latin “times or opportunities,” what was said would not be expressed even so, because times are called kairoi whether they are opportune or inopportune. Therefore to compute the times, that is, chronous, so that we may know when the end of this age or the coming of the Lord will be, seems to me nothing else than to wish to know what he himself says no one can know.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 197.3 (CSEL 57:233; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-3).

## Letter 197.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-4
- Source: CSEL 57:233–234
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes the end will not come before the gospel is preached to all nations, but even that would not tell us how much time remains.

### Latin text

Opportunitas uero illius temporis profecto non erit, antequam praedicetur euangelium in uniuerso orbe in testimonium omnibus gentibus. apertissima enim de hac re legitur sententia saluatoris dicentis: Et praedicabitur hoc euangelium regni in uniuerso orbe in testimonium omnibus gentibus et tunc ueniet finis. tunc ueniet quid est nisi ante non ueniet? quando post ergo ueniat, incertum nobis est; ante tamen non esse uenturum dubitare utique non debemus. si ergo susciperent hunc laborem dei serui. ut peragrato orbe terrarum, quantum possent, colligerent, quid remansit gentium, ubi nondum est euangelium praedicatum, hinc aduertere utcumque possemus, quantum hoc tempus longe sit a saeculi fine. quod si propter quaedam loca inaccessibilia et inhospita fieri posse non creditur, ut a seruis dei peragretur orbis et, quot quantaeque sint adhuc gentes sine Christi euangelio, fideliter renuntietur, multo minus existimo in scripturis posse comprehendi, quanta usque ad finem futura sint tempora, quando quidem in eis legimus: Nemo potest cognoscere tempora, quae pater in sua posuit potestate. unde si iam nobis certissime renuntiatum fuisset in omnibus gentibus euangelium praedicari, nec sic possemus dicere, quantum temporis remaneret in fine, sed magis magisque iam propinquare merito diceremus, nisi quis forte respondeat tanta celeritate praedicato euangelio Romanas gentes et plerasque barbaras occupatas atque ita nonnullas non paulatim sed subito ad fidem Christi fuisse conuersas, ut non sit incredibile paucis annis etsi non uitae nostrae, qui iam senuimus. certe iuuenum, qui uenturi sunt ad senectam, uniuersas omnino residuas gentes euangelio posse compleri. sed si ita erit, facilius, cum factum fuerit, probari experiendo quam legendo, antequam fiat, inueniri potest.

### English translation (Claude)

The opportune moment of that time, however, will certainly not come before the gospel is preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations. For there is a most plain statement of the Savior on this matter, where he says: “And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” What does “then it will come” mean if not that it will not come before? How long afterward it will come, then, is uncertain to us; but that it will not come before, we certainly ought not to doubt. So if the servants of God were to undertake this labor of travelling through the whole world, as far as they could, and gathering what nations remain where the gospel has not yet been preached, we might from this in some way perceive how far this time is from the end of the age. But if it is not believed possible, because of certain inaccessible and inhospitable places, for the servants of God to travel through the world and faithfully report how many and how great nations are still without the gospel of Christ, much less, I think, can it be gathered from the Scriptures how great the times are that will run until the end, since in them we read: “No one can know the times which the Father has put in his own power.” Hence, even if it had already been reported to us with complete certainty that the gospel was being preached in all nations, not even so could we say how much time remained until the end; but we would rightly say that it was drawing nearer and nearer, unless someone should reply that, since the gospel has been preached with such speed, the Roman peoples and very many barbarian ones have been taken hold of, and some have been converted to the faith of Christ not gradually but suddenly, so that it is not incredible that within a few years (if not of our life, for we are already old, then certainly of the young who will come to old age) all the remaining nations altogether can be filled with the gospel. But if it is to be so, it can more easily be proved by experience when it has happened than discovered by reading before it happens.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:14: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 197.4 (CSEL 57:233–234; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-4).

## Letter 197.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-5
- Source: CSEL 57:234–235
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he wrote because of someone who referred Daniel's weeks to Christ's second coming, and he prefers cautious ignorance to false knowledge.

### Latin text

Hoc me compulit dicere cuiusdam opinio, quem presbyter quoque Hieronymus temeritatis notat, quod ausus fuerit Danihelis hebdomadas de aduentu Christi futuro, non de praeterito exponere. si quid autem pro meritis potioribus sanctae humilitati cordis tui dominus melius reuelauit siue reuelauerit, peto nobiscum communicare digneris et haec nostra rescripta sic accipere tamquam hominis, qui mallem quidem eorum, quae a me inquisisti, habere scientiam quam ignorantiam; sed quia id nondum potui, magis eligo cautam ignorantiam confiteri quam falsam scientiam profiteri.

### English translation (Claude)

What compelled me to say this was the opinion of a certain man, whom the presbyter Jerome also marks as rash, because he dared to explain the weeks of Daniel of the future coming of Christ, not of the past one. But if the Lord, for its greater merits, has revealed or shall reveal something better to the holy humility of your heart, I ask you to be good enough to share it with us, and to receive this reply of ours as from a man who would rather have knowledge than ignorance of the things you asked me about; but since I have not yet been able to have it, I choose rather to confess a cautious ignorance than to profess a false knowledge.

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:24: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jerome's Commentary on Daniel (on 9:24) reports the various interpretations of the seventy weeks; the person criticized is not named here.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 197.5 (CSEL 57:234–235; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/196-1/#p-197-5).

## Letter 198.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-1
- Source: CSEL 57:235
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius, bishop of Salona, thanks Augustine for his letter and Jerome's writings and sets out his own views on the end times.

### Latin text

Desideranti et expectanti mihi sanctus conpresbyter noster Cornutus litteras pertulit beatitudinis tuae, quae me laetificarunt, quia memoriam nostri bonam habere dignatus es, qui et mihi paucis sermone proprio sanctae mentis tuae de his. quae petieram, in transitu significasti. aliquanta autem de opusculis sancti conpresbyteri Hieronymi adiunxisti. ut meam quaestionem lectione eius operis de sanctis scripturis explere possem. et quia dignatus es id petere a nobis, ut, quid senserimus de ipsis quaestionibus, per litteras tuae sincerissimae caritati insinuaremus, ad ea, de quibus scripta legi, prout intellectus exiguus meae mediocritatis sentire potuit aut intellegere, infra scripsi.

### English translation (Claude)

To my longing and expectation, our holy fellow presbyter Cornutus brought the letter of Your Blessedness, which gladdened me, because you were good enough to keep a kind remembrance of us; you also briefly indicated to me in passing, in the words of your own holy mind, your view on the things I had asked about. And you added some of the works of the holy fellow presbyter Jerome, so that I might satisfy my question by reading his work on the holy Scriptures. And since you were good enough to ask of us that we should make known by letter to Your most sincere Charity what we thought about these questions, I have written below on the matters about which I read the writings, as far as the small understanding of my mediocrity could perceive or understand.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Hesychius of Salona to Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.1 (CSEL 57:235; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-1).

## Letter 198.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-2
- Source: CSEL 57:235–236
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius argues that the older reading of Acts 1:7 ("it is not yours to know") restricts the apostles' role rather than forbidding all knowledge of the times.

### Latin text

Cum dei omnipotentis conditoris totius creaturae arbitrio et potestate cuncta geruntur, uel ea. quae facta sunt, uel quae etiam futura sunt, sanctorum prophetarum uocibus cognoscuntur, qui, priusquam fierent ea, quae futura erant, uoluntate diuina hominibus sunt locuti. unde satis admiratione plenum est, si ea deus, quae praedici uoluit, ad hominum sensus penitus non posse peruenire constituit secundum hoc capitulum, quod dominus beatis apostolis locutus est dicens: Nemo potest cognoscere tempora, quae pater in sua posuit potestate, primum quia et in antiquissimis libris ecclesiarum non ita scriptum est nemo potest, sed scriptum est: Non est uestrum nosse tempora uel momenta, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, quae ratio sermonis sequenti uerbo recte completur, cum dicit: Sed eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in Iudaeam et in Samariam et usque ad ultimum terrae. non ergo apostolos testes consummationis mundi sed nominis et resurrectionis suae uoluit intellegi.

### English translation (Claude)

Since all things are done by the will and power of God almighty, the Creator of all creation, both the things that have been done and also those that are to come are known through the voices of the holy prophets, who, before the things that were to come took place, spoke to men by the divine will. Hence it is quite astonishing if God decreed that the things he wished to be foretold could not reach human understanding at all, according to the saying the Lord spoke to the blessed apostles: “No one can know the times which the Father has put in his own power.” First, because in the most ancient books of the churches it is not written “no one can,” but it is written: “It is not yours to know the times or moments which the Father has put in his own power”; and the sense of this saying is rightly completed by the following words, when he says: “But you shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in Judea and in Samaria and to the end of the earth.” So he wished the apostles to be understood as witnesses not of the consummation of the world but of his name and resurrection.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:7–8; Hesychius contrasts the reading “no one can know” with that of older manuscripts, “it is not yours to know”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.2 (CSEL 57:235–236; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-2).

## Letter 198.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-3
- Source: CSEL 57:236–238
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius gathers Scripture passages in which the Lord and the apostles urge believers to recognize the times.

### Latin text

Nam de temporibus cognoscendis ipse dominus monet: Quisnam est fidelis seruus et prudens, quem constituit dominus super familiam suam. ut det illis cibum in tempore? beatus ille seruus, quem ueniens dominus eius inuenerit sic facientem! familia Christi uerbo praedicationis pascitur et fidelis famulus inuenitur, qui in tempore expectantibus dominum necessariam escam credentibus praestat. malus enim seruus sic reprehenditur: Quod si dixerit malus seruus: Moram facit dominus meus uenire, ueniet dominus eius in die, qua nescit, et hora, qua ignorat, et reliqua. item arguit, quare tempus non cognoscatur, dicendo: Hypocritae, faciem caeli nostis probare, tempus hoc quare non agnoscitis? item apostolus: In nouissimis temporibus instabunt tempora periculosa et reliqua. item apostolus: De temporibus autem et momentis non necesse habemus uobis scribere; uos enim ipsi diligenter scitis, quia dies domini sicut fur in nocte ita ueniet. cum dixerint: Pax et securitas, tunc subitaneus illis apparebit interitus quo modo dolores parturientis et non effugient. item apostolus: Non retinetis memoria, quia, cum essem apud uos, haec dicebam uobis? et nunc quid detineat, scitis, ut reueletur in suo tempore. nam mysterium iam operatur iniquitatis;tantumqui tenet modo,teneat, donec de medio fiat, et tunc reuelabitur ille iniquus, quem dominus Iesus interficiet spiritu oris sui. item dominus in euangelio increpat Iudaeos: Et tu, si cognouisses tempus uisitationis tuae, forsitan permansisses; nunc autem absconsa sunt ab oculis tuis. et dominus sic praedicat ad Iudaeos: Paenitentiam agite, completa sunt tempora, credite in euangelio. et ad Iudaeos quidem recte completa dicebat, quia eorum tempora post eius praedicationem et triginta et quinque uel quadraginta annos finita sunt. et in Danihelo: Quoadusque interfecta est bestia et periit et corpus eius datum est, ut comburatur, et reliquarum bestiarum regnum translatum est et magnitudo uitae data est eis usque ad tempus, quod Graece dicitur χρόνος et ϰαιρός. et insequitur: Ecce cum nubibus caeli ut filius hominis ueniens. mysterium bestiae et reliquarum bestiarum translationem intellegentibus scripturarum manifestum est.

### English translation (Claude)

For the Lord himself gives warning about knowing the times: “Who then is the faithful and wise servant whom his master has set over his household, to give them food in due time? Blessed is that servant whom his master, when he comes, finds so doing!” Christ's household is fed by the word of preaching, and that servant is found faithful who in due time supplies the necessary food to believers waiting for the Lord. For the wicked servant is rebuked thus: “But if that wicked servant says, ‘My master is delaying his coming,’ his master will come on a day he does not know and at an hour he is unaware of,” and so on. Again he reproves them for not recognizing the time, saying: “Hypocrites, you know how to judge the face of the sky; why do you not recognize this time?” Again the apostle: “In the last times perilous times will come,” and so on. Again the apostle: “But concerning the times and moments we have no need to write to you; for you yourselves know accurately that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. When they say, ‘Peace and security,’ then sudden destruction will appear to them, like the pains of a woman in labor, and they will not escape.” Again the apostle: “Do you not remember that when I was with you I told you these things? And now you know what is restraining, so that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of iniquity is already at work; only let him who now restrains restrain until he is taken out of the way, and then that wicked one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth.” Again the Lord in the gospel rebukes the Jews: “And you, if you had known the time of your visitation, perhaps you would have remained; but now it is hidden from your eyes.” And the Lord preaches thus to the Jews: “Repent, the times are fulfilled; believe in the gospel.” And to the Jews he rightly said that they were fulfilled, because their times came to an end thirty-five or forty years after his preaching. And in Daniel: “Until the beast was slain and perished and its body was given to be burned, and the dominion of the other beasts was taken away, and length of life was given to them until a time,” which is said in Greek chronos and kairos. And it continues: “Behold, one like a son of man coming with the clouds of heaven.” The mystery of the beast and of the taking away of the other beasts is plain to those who understand the Scriptures.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:45–46: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:48–50: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 12:56: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:1–3: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Thess 2:5–8: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 19:44: quotation, medium confidence
- Mark 1:15: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 7:11–13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:45–46, 48–50; Luke 12:56 (cf. Matt 16:3); 2 Tim 3:1; 1 Thess 5:1–3; 2 Thess 2:5–8; Luke 19:42–44 in a free form (“perhaps you would have remained” has no exact equivalent in the Gospel); Mark 1:15; Dan 7:11–13 (Theodotion: “until a time and a season”). The “thirty-five or forty years” refer to the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.3 (CSEL 57:236–238; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-3).

## Letter 198.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-4
- Source: CSEL 57:238–239
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius argues from Scripture that Christ's coming is to be loved and awaited.

### Latin text

Secundum quod aduentus domini diligendus et expectandus. est enim magna beatitudo diligentibus eius aduentum, sicut testimonium perhibet beatus apostolus Paulus: De cetero, inquit, reposita est mihi corona iustitiae, quam reddet mihi dominus iustus iudex in illa die, non solum autem mihi sed et his, qui diligunt aduentum domini. et dominus in euangelio: Tunc iusti fulgebunt sicut sol in regno patris sui. item propheta: Ecce enim tenebrae et caligo operient terram super gentes; in te uero apparebit dominus et maiestas eius in te uidebitur. item propheta: Qui uero expectant dominum, exultabunt cum uirtute, producent pennas sicut aquilae, current et non laborabunt, ambulabunt et non esurient. et plurima talia, quae ad beatitudinem eorum pertinent, qui diligunt aduentum domini, inueniuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Second, that the Lord's coming is to be loved and awaited. For there is great blessedness for those who love his coming, as the blessed apostle Paul bears witness: “For the rest,” he says, “there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me on that day, and not only to me but also to those who love the Lord's coming.” And the Lord in the gospel: “Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father.” Again the prophet: “For behold, darkness and gloom will cover the earth, over the nations; but upon you the Lord will appear, and his majesty will be seen upon you.” Again the prophet: “But those who wait for the Lord will exult in strength; they will put forth wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary; they will walk and not hunger.” And many such things are found that relate to the blessedness of those who love the Lord's coming.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:43: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 60:2: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 4:8; Matt 13:43; Isa 60:2; Isa 40:31 (in an Old Latin form: “they will not hunger”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.4 (CSEL 57:238–239; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-4).

## Letter 198.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-5
- Source: CSEL 57:239–240
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius holds that the date cannot be calculated but that most of the signs of Christ's coming foretold in the Gospels have been fulfilled in his own time.

### Latin text

Quod autem nemo possit temporum mensuras colligere. manifestum est. euangelium quidem dicit: De die et hora nemo scit, ego autem pro inpossibilitate intellectus mei dico neque diem neque mensem neque annum aduentus ipsius sciri posse; sed signa quae sunt aduentus uidendo et credendo et expectare me conuenit et credentibus escam hanc retribuere, ut expectantes diligant aduentum eius, qui dixit: Haec omnia cum uideritis, scitote, quoniam prope est in ianuis. signa ergo euangelica et prophetica, quae in nobis completa sunt, aduentum domini manifestant. nam frustra, aut qui quaerunt aut qui calumniantur, dies et annos in computo comprehendere quaerunt, cum scriptum sit, quia: Et nisi adbreuiati fuissent dies illi, non fieret salua omnis caro; sed propter electos breuiabuntur dies illi. certum est tempus carere computum, quod breuiandum est a domino, qui tempora constituit; adpropinquasse autem aduentum, cuius signa aduentus aliqua uidimus ex his, quae facta sunt, esse completa. et iterum dicit: His autem fieri incipientibus respirabitis et leuabitis capita uestra, quoniam adpropiabit redemptio uestra. quae autem signa dixit uidenda, manifestum in euangelio sancti Lucae: Et Hierusalem calcabitur a gentibus, donec impleantur tempora gentium. hoc factum est et fieri nulli dubium est. et insequitur: Et erunt signa in sole, in luna, in stellis et in terra pressura gentium. ea, quae patimur, confiteri et poena compellit, si forte non curet uoluntas: nam in uno tempore et signa in caelo et pressuram gentium in terris ab hominibus uideri et sustineri manifestum est. et insequitur: Arescentibus hominibus prae timore et expectatione, quae superueniunt uniuerso orbi. nullam patriam, nullum locum nostris temporibus non affligi aut humiliari certum est, sicut dictum est: Prae timore et expectatione, quae superueniunt uniuerso orbi, et omnia signa, quae superius euangelium legentibus manifestat. ex maxima parte completa sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

That no one can gather the measures of the times is plain. The gospel indeed says: “Of the day and hour no one knows,” and I, for the incapacity of my understanding, say that neither the day nor the month nor the year of his coming can be known; but it befits me, seeing and believing the signs that belong to his coming, both to wait for it and to give this food in return to believers, so that while waiting they may love the coming of him who said: “When you see all these things, know that he is near, at the doors.” The signs of the gospels and the prophets, then, which have been fulfilled in us, show that the Lord's coming is at hand. For it is in vain that those who inquire, or those who make false accusations, seek to comprehend the days and years in a calculation, since it is written: “And unless those days had been shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.” It is certain that a time which is to be shortened by the Lord, who established the times, admits of no calculation; but that the coming has drawn near, we have seen from some of the signs of his coming that have happened, which have been fulfilled. And again he says: “When these things begin to take place, you will breathe again and lift up your heads, for your redemption will draw near.” What signs he said were to be seen is plain in the gospel of Saint Luke: “And Jerusalem will be trampled by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” This has happened, and no one doubts that it is happening. And it continues: “And there will be signs in the sun, in the moon, in the stars, and on earth distress of nations.” What we suffer, punishment compels us to acknowledge, even if our will perhaps does not care: for it is plain that at one time signs in the sky are seen and distress of nations on earth is endured by men. And it continues: “Men withering from fear and expectation of what is coming upon the whole world.” It is certain that no country and no place in our times is not afflicted or humbled, as it was said: “From fear and expectation of what is coming upon the whole world”; and all the signs that the gospel above shows to its readers have for the most part been fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:36: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:33: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:22: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:28: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:24–26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:36, 33, 22; Luke 21:28, 24–26. The digital text of Luke 21:25 is garbled; “in the sun” is restored by a logged correction.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.5 (CSEL 57:239–240; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-5).

## Letter 198.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-6
- Source: CSEL 57:240–241
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius argues that the gospel has already been preached throughout the world, its growth slowed by persecution but quickened under the Christian emperors.

### Latin text

Quod autem dictum est: Et praedicabitur hoc euangelium in uniuerso mundo et tunc ueniet finis, prius quod ipsius domini repromissio talis fuit, ut ipsi apostoli eius nominis et resurrectionis testes fierent in Hierusalem et in Iudaeam et in Samariam et usque ad extremum terrae, et apostolus hac auctoritate docet: Sed dico, numquid non audierunt? in omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum et in fines orbis terrae uerba eorum. item: Propter spem, quae reposita est uobis, quam ante audistis in uerbo ueritatis euangelii, quod aduenit in uos, sicut et in omni mundo est fructificans et crescens. sed apostolis initiata fides in gentibus habuit multos persecutores, ut retenta tardius inualesceret, ut illud impleretur: Ante haec omnia primum in uos manus inmittent suas et persequentur et tradent uos in synagogas et in custodias ducentes ad reges et ad praesides propter nomen meum, ut illud impleretur, quod scriptum erat: Et uelociter reaedificaberis. quibus destructa es. nam ex quo clementissimi imperatores Christiani dei uoluntate esse coeperunt, quicquid paulatim fides, causa persecutionis, crescebat in saeculis, factis regibus Christianis ubique in paruo tempore euangelium Christi penetrauit.

### English translation (Claude)

As to the saying, “And this gospel will be preached in the whole world, and then the end will come”: first, the Lord's own promise was that his apostles would become witnesses of his name and resurrection in Jerusalem and in Judea and in Samaria and to the end of the earth; and the apostle teaches on this authority: “But I say, have they not heard? Their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.” Again: “Because of the hope that is laid up for you, of which you heard before in the word of the truth of the gospel, which has come to you, as it is also in the whole world bearing fruit and growing.” But the faith begun by the apostles among the nations had many persecutors, so that, held back, it grew strong more slowly, so that this might be fulfilled: “But before all these things they will lay their hands on you and persecute you and deliver you up to synagogues and prisons, bringing you before kings and governors for my name's sake,” so that what was written might be fulfilled: “And you will be rebuilt quickly by those who destroyed you.” For from the time when, by God's will, the most clement Christian emperors came into being, whereas the faith had grown gradually through the ages because of persecution, once kings had become Christian the gospel of Christ penetrated everywhere in a short time.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:14: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:4 (18:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:5–6: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:12: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 49:17: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:14; Acts 1:8; Rom 10:18 (quoting Ps 19:4); Col 1:5–6; Luke 21:12; Isa 49:17 (Old Latin, after the LXX). Goldbacher marks a gap after “first” (prius quod); the sense is translated as it stands.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.6 (CSEL 57:240–241; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-6).

## Letter 198.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-7
- Source: CSEL 57:241–243
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hesychius questions whether Daniel's weeks were fulfilled at Christ's birth and passion, since Christ himself spoke of the abomination of desolation as still to come.

### Latin text

Expositio sane beati Danihelis de hebdomadibus, quamuis sanctus conpresbyter noster Hieronymus exposuit, qualiter doctores ecclesiarum tradidissent, lectorem............ nam si ipse doctissimus uir conpresbyter noster ait periculosum esse de magistrorum ecclesiarum iudicare sententiis et alterum praeferre alteri, quanto magis hoc lector facere non potest. quod magister facere dubitauit! nos autem credimus, quod dominus ait. quia caelum et terra transiet, iota autem unum uel unus apex non transiet a lege, donec omnia fiant. quo modo ergo mysterium hebdomadarum sit impletum usque ad natiuitatem et passionem Christi, admiror. cum illud in dimidio hebdomadae propheta locutus est dicendo: In dimidio hebdomadae tolletur sacrificium meum et supplicatio et abominatio desolationum erit ad sacrificium. haec ergo abominatio si iam completa fuerat. quo modo dominus monet et dicit: Cum uideritis abominationem desolationis, quod dictum est per Danihelem prophetam, stantem in loco sancto, qui legit. intellegat? ego autem, ne petitioni beatitudinis tuae contemptor essem, haec, quem ad modum sensi, scripsi ad tuam caritatem. plenius autem dignare nos uerbo gratiae tuae rescribendo instruere et laetificare.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the exposition of the blessed Daniel concerning the weeks, although our holy fellow presbyter Jerome set out how the teachers of the churches had handed it down, the reader … For if that most learned man himself, our fellow presbyter, says that it is dangerous to judge the opinions of the teachers of the churches and to prefer one to another, how much less can the reader do what the teacher hesitated to do! But we believe what the Lord said, that heaven and earth will pass away, but not one iota or one stroke will pass from the law until all things come to pass. How then the mystery of the weeks was fulfilled up to the birth and passion of Christ, I wonder, since the prophet spoke of the half of the week, saying: “In the half of the week my sacrifice and supplication will be taken away, and there will be the abomination of desolations at the sacrifice.” If, then, this abomination had already been fulfilled, how does the Lord warn us and say: “When you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let him who reads understand)”? I, for my part, so as not to slight the request of Your Blessedness, have written these things to Your Charity as I understood them. Be good enough to instruct and gladden us more fully by writing back with the word of your grace.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:18: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:27: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The digital text marks a gap after “the reader” (lectorem……); it is not filled. Jerome's remark is from his Commentary on Daniel (9:24). Matt 5:18; Dan 9:27 (Old Latin); Matt 24:15. The missing word is probably “leaves in suspense”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 198.7 (CSEL 57:241–243; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-198-7).

## Letter 199.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-1
- Source: CSEL 57:243–245
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Hesychius for urging love of Christ's coming and argues that ignorance of its time does not prevent the faithful from longing for it.

### Latin text

Accepi litteras uenerationis tuae, quibus ualde salubriter exhortaris, ut saluatoris nostri diligatur et desideretur aduentus. facis hoc ut seruus bonus eiusdem patris familias auidus lucrorum domini tui et uolens habere plurimos socios dilectionis, qua ipse praecipue et perseueranter accenderis. intuentes igitur, quod commemorasti de apostolo, quia dominum dixit redditurum coronam iustitiae non tantum sibi sed et omnibus, qui diligunt manifestationem eius. ita recte uiuimus et in hoc saeculo tamquam peregrini agimus, cum se in hac dilectione cor nostrum proficienter extendit, siue citius siue tardius ueniat, quam putatur, cuius manifestatio fideli caritate diligitur et pio desideratur affectu. seruus quippe ille, qui dicit: Moram facit dominus meus et percutit conseruos suos, manducat et bibit cum ebriosis, non utique diligit manifestationem eius; ex moribus enim apparet animus eius. quos mores licet breuiter ideo magister bonus curauit exprimere, id est superbiam atque luxuriam, ne, quod dicebat: Moram facit dominus meus, desiderio domini sui dicere crederetur, quo ardebat ille, qui dicebat: Sitiuit anima mea ad deum uiuum; quando ueniam et apparebo ante faciem dei? dicendo enim quando ueniam? moras se perpeti moleste ferebat. quia, etiam quod tempore acceleratur, desiderio tardum uidetur. quo modo autem tardus est eius aduentus uel quo modo longe futurus est, cum ipsi apostoli tempore, quo adhuc erant in carne, dixerint: Nouissima hora est, quamuis a domino audierint: Non est uestrum scire tempora? hoc ergo nesciebant, quod nescimus et nos — quantum ad me attinet, dico, et eos, qui hoc mecum nesciunt —; et tamen, quibus dictum est: Non est uestrum scire tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, diligebant eius manifestationem et dabant conseruis in tempore cibaria nec percutiebant eos dominando eis nec luxuriabantur cum amatoribus mundi dicentes: Moram facit dominus meus.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received the letter of Your Reverence, in which you exhort us most wholesomely that the coming of our Savior be loved and longed for. You do this as a good servant of the same householder, eager for your Lord's gain and wishing to have very many companions in the love with which you yourself are especially and constantly kindled. Keeping in view, then, what you mentioned from the apostle, that he said the Lord would give the crown of righteousness not only to him but also to all who love his appearing, we live rightly and conduct ourselves in this world as pilgrims when our heart stretches itself out, making progress, in this love, whether he whose appearing is loved with faithful love and longed for with devout affection comes sooner or later than is thought. For that servant who says, “My master is delaying,” and beats his fellow servants and eats and drinks with drunkards, certainly does not love his appearing; for his mind is evident from his conduct. The good Teacher took care to express that conduct, though briefly, namely pride and self-indulgence, precisely so that what he said, “My master is delaying,” should not be thought to be said out of longing for his master, the longing with which he burned who said: “My soul has thirsted for the living God; when shall I come and appear before the face of God?” For in saying, “When shall I come?” he showed that he bore the delay with impatience, because even what comes quickly in time seems slow to longing. But how is his coming slow, or how is it far off, when the apostles themselves, at the time when they were still in the flesh, said, “It is the last hour,” although they had heard from the Lord, “It is not yours to know the times”? So they did not know what we also do not know (I speak as far as I am concerned, and of those who share this ignorance with me); and yet those to whom it was said, “It is not yours to know the times which the Father has put in his own power,” loved his appearing, and gave their fellow servants food in due time, and did not beat them by lording it over them, nor did they live self-indulgently with the lovers of the world, saying, “My master is delaying.”

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:48–49: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 42:2 (41:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:18: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 199 is to Hesychius of Salona, answering Letter 198. 2 Tim 4:8; Matt 24:48–49; Ps 42:2; 1 John 2:18; Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.1 (CSEL 57:243–245; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-1).

## Letter 199.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-2
- Source: CSEL 57:245–246
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes innocent ignorance of the end's timing from moral negligence, and says each person's last day determines how the last day of the world will find him.

### Latin text

Alia est ergo ignorantia temporum alia labes morum amorque uitiorum. nam et apostolus Paulus, quando dicebat: Non cito moueamini mente neque terreamini siue per uerbum siue per epistulam tamquam per nos, quasi instet dies domini. nolebat utique, ut crederent eis, qui iam propinquare domini arbitrabantur aduentum; nec tamen uolebat, ut tamquam seruus ille dicerent: Moram facit dominus meus uenire et traderent se superbiae luxuriaeque perdendos; sed sic eos nolebat de propinquante die nouissimo falsis auscultare rumoribus, ut tamen uellet eos paratos aduentum domini sui lumbis accinctis et lucernis ardentibus opperiri. quibus dicit: Vos autem, fratres, non estis in tenebris, ut dies ille uos tamquam fur comprehendat. omnes enim uos filii lucis estis et filii diei: non sumus noctis neque tenebrarum. ille autem, qui sic dicit: Moram facit dominus meus uenire, ut percutiat conseruos suos et epuletur cum ebriosis, non est lucis sed tenebrarum et ideo eum tamquam fur dies ille comprehendet. quod unusquisque debet etiam de die huius uitae suae nouissimo formidare; in quo enim quemque inuenerit suus nouissimus dies, in hoc eum comprehendet mundi nouissimus dies, quoniam. qualis in die isto quisque moritur, talis in die illo iudicabitur.

### English translation (Claude)

Ignorance of the times, then, is one thing; corruption of conduct and love of vices is another. For the apostle Paul too, when he said, “Do not be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by word or by letter as if from us, as though the day of the Lord were at hand,” certainly did not want them to believe those who thought the Lord's coming was already near; and yet he did not want them, like that servant, to say, “My master is delaying his coming,” and to hand themselves over to pride and self-indulgence to be ruined. Rather, while he did not want them to listen to false rumors about the last day being near, he still wanted them to be ready and to wait for their Lord's coming with loins girded and lamps burning. To them he says: “But you, brothers, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you like a thief. For you are all sons of light and sons of the day; we are not of the night or of darkness.” But the one who says, “My master is delaying his coming,” so as to beat his fellow servants and feast with drunkards, is not of the light but of darkness, and therefore that day will overtake him like a thief. And each one ought to fear this also with regard to the last day of his own life; for in whatever state his own last day finds each person, in that state the last day of the world will overtake him, since as each one dies on that day, so will he be judged on the other.

### Scripture references

- 2 Thess 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:48–49: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 12:35: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:4–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Thess 2:2; Matt 24:48–49; Luke 12:35; 1 Thess 5:4–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.2 (CSEL 57:245–246; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-2).

## Letter 199.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-3
- Source: CSEL 57:246–247
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ's command to all to watch applies to every Christian because each person's death fixes the state in which he will be judged.

### Latin text

Ad hoc pertinet. quod in euangelio secundum Marcum ita scriptum est: Vigilate ergo, quia nescitis, quando dominus domus ueniat, sero an media nocte an galli cantu an mane, ne, cum uenerit repente, inueniat uos dormientes. quod autem nobis dico, omnibus dico: Vigilate. quibus enim omnibus dicit, nisi electis et dilectis suis ad corpus eius pertinentibus, quod est ecclesia? non solum ergo illis dixit, quibus tunc audientibus loquebatur, sed etiam illis, qui fuerunt post illos ante nos, et ad nos ipsos et qui erunt post nos usque ad eius nouissimum aduentum. numquid autem omnes inuenturus est dies ille in hac uita aut quisquam dicturus est, quod ad defunctos etiam pertineat, quod ait: Vigilate, ne, cum uenerit repente, inueniat uos dormientes? cur itaque omnibus dicit. quod ad eos solos pertineat, qui tunc erunt, nisi quia eo modo ad omnes pertinet, quo modo dixi? tunc enim unicuique ueniet dies ille, cum uenerit ei dies, ut talis hinc exeat, qualis. iudicandus est illo die. ac per hoc uigilare debet omnis Christianus, ne inparatum eum inueniat domini aduentus. inparatum autem inueniet ille dies, quem inparatum inuenerit suae uitae huius ultimus dies. certe enim hoc saltem manifestum erat apostolis non eorum temporibus, cum hic in carne uiuerent, dominum esse uenturum; et tamen quis dubitet eos praecipue uigilasse et seruasse, quod omnibus dixit, ne inparatos repente ueniens inueniret?

### English translation (Claude)

To this belongs what is written in the gospel according to Mark: “Watch, therefore, for you do not know when the master of the house is coming, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or in the morning, lest, coming suddenly, he find you asleep. And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch.” To whom does he say “to all,” if not to his chosen and beloved ones who belong to his body, which is the Church? So he did not say it only to those to whom he was speaking as they heard him then, but also to those who came after them and before us, and to ourselves, and to those who will be after us until his last coming. But will that day find all of them in this life? Or will anyone say that what he says, “Watch, lest, coming suddenly, he find you asleep,” applies also to the dead? Why then does he say to all what would apply only to those who will be alive then, unless because it applies to all in the way I have said? For that day will come to each one when the day comes for him to depart from here in the state in which he is to be judged on that day. And for this reason every Christian ought to watch, lest the Lord's coming find him unprepared. But that day will find unprepared the one whom the last day of this life of his has found unprepared. For it was certainly plain at least to the apostles that the Lord would not come in their times, while they lived here in the flesh; and yet who would doubt that they watched above all and kept what he said to all, so that he might not come suddenly and find them unprepared?

### Scripture references

- Mark 13:35–37: quotation, high confidence
- Col 1:24: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Mark 13:35–37; Col 1:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.3 (CSEL 57:246–247; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-3).

## Letter 199.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-4
- Source: CSEL 57:247–248
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine objects that even if Acts 1:7 meant only that the apostles should not teach the times, no later teacher could presume to know or teach what they were not given.

### Latin text

Nondum sane intellego, quonam modo accipi debeat, quod scripsit sanctitas tua propterea dixisse dominum apostolis: Non est uestrum nosse tempora uel momenta, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, quoniam secutus adiunxit: Sed eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in Iudaeam et in Samariam et usque ad ultimum terrae. quem scripturae sensum sic exponis, ut dicas: Non ergo apostolos testes consummationis mundi sed nominis et resurrectionis suae uoluit intellegi?. non quidem ille ait: Non est uestrum praedicare tempora sed: Non est uestrum nosse. uerum si ita uis intellegi, quod ait: Non est uestrum scire. ac si diceret: Non est uestrum scientes facere, id est non est uestrum hoc docere, quis nostrum docere audeat uel se scire praesumat, quod deus ille magister nec eos discipulos docuit, a quibus praesentibus interrogatus est praesens, nec illi tam sancti magnique doctores ecclesiam docere potuerunt?

### English translation (Claude)

I do not yet understand, of course, how one should take what Your Holiness wrote, that the Lord said to the apostles, “It is not yours to know the times or moments which the Father has put in his own power,” for this reason, that he went on to add: “But you shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in Judea and in Samaria and to the end of the earth.” You explain this sense of Scripture by saying: “So he wished the apostles to be understood as witnesses not of the consummation of the world but of his name and resurrection.” He did not say, “It is not yours to preach the times,” but, “It is not yours to know.” But if you wish what he said, “It is not yours to know,” to be understood as if he said, “It is not yours to make known,” that is, “It is not yours to teach this,” which of us would dare to teach, or presume to know, what God, that great Teacher, did not teach even those disciples by whom he was questioned face to face, and what those teachers, so holy and so great, were not able to teach the Church?

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:7–8; Augustine quotes Hesychius' Letter 198.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.4 (CSEL 57:247–248; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-4).

## Letter 199.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-5
- Source: CSEL 57:248–249
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if the prophets had revealed the date, the apostles would have known and taught it, so God withheld the knowledge because it would not be profitable.

### Latin text

An respondebitur haec non docuisse apostolos sed prophetas? hoc enim aisti et uerum est, quod ea. quae futura sunt, sanctorum prophetarum uocibus cognoscuntur, qui, priusquam fierent, inquis, ea, quae futura erant, uoluntate diuina hominibus sunt locuti. sed si ueneratio tua <satis admiratione plenum) esse dicit, si ea deus, quae praedici uoluit, ad hominum sensus penitus non posse peruenire constituit, quanto maiore admiratione plenum est, si ea, quae prophetae hominibus sunt locuti, haec apostoli uel scire sunt prohibiti uel docere! quo modo autem prophetae ista, de quibus agitur. tempora docentes non intellegerentur ab apostolis, si intelleguntur a nobis? aut si eos apostoli intellexerunt istam mensuram temporis prophetantes, quo modo non docerent, quod intellexerunt, quando per eorum praeconium et ipsi prophetae innotescebant, qui eos suis libris ista docuerunt? et ideo per quas litteras ea ipsi didicerant, per easdem poterant alii quoque in his gentibus discere, in quibus apostoli auctoritatem propheticam commendabant. cur ergo eis dictum est: Non est uestrum scire uel, si ita intellegendum est, non est uestrum docere tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, quando quidem sic ea docebant, cum hi, in quorum litteris discerentur, per illos innotescebant? unde credibilius est non deum noluisse sciri, quod noluit praedicari, sed noluisse praedicari, quod uidebat non utiliter sciri.

### English translation (Claude)

Or will it be answered that it was not the apostles but the prophets who taught these things? For you said this, and it is true, that “the things that are to come are known through the voices of the holy prophets, who,” you say, “before the things that were to come took place, spoke to men by the divine will.” But if Your Reverence says it is “quite astonishing if God decreed that the things he wished to be foretold could not reach human understanding at all,” how much more astonishing is it if the apostles were forbidden either to know or to teach the things the prophets spoke to men! And how could the prophets who taught these times in question not have been understood by the apostles, if they are understood by us? Or if the apostles understood them when they prophesied that measure of time, how would they not teach what they understood, when through their preaching the prophets themselves also became known, who taught them these things in their books? And therefore through the same writings through which they themselves had learned these things, others too could learn them among those nations to which the apostles commended the prophetic authority. Why then was it said to them, “It is not yours to know” (or, if that is how it must be understood, “It is not yours to teach”) “the times which the Father has put in his own power,” since they were in fact teaching them, in that the men in whose writings they would be learned were becoming known through them? Hence it is more credible that God did not refuse to have known what he refused to have preached, but refused to have preached what he saw would not be profitably known.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Hesychius' Letter 198.2; Acts 1:7. The odd brackets around the quoted phrase in the digital text are left as they stand.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.5 (CSEL 57:248–249; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-5).

## Letter 199.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-6
- Source: CSEL 57:249–250
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies that Christ's warnings about the faithful servant and about discerning the time call for constant watchfulness and recognition of his first coming, not calculation of the second.

### Latin text

Cur ergo, inquis, de temporibus cognoscendis ipse dominus monet, ubi dicit: Quisnam est fidelis seruus et prudens, quem constituit dominus super familiam suam, ut det illis cibum in tempore? et cetera. immo uero monet, non ut bonus seruus cognoscat temporum finem, sed ut omni tempore in opere bono uigilet, quia nescit temporum finem; non monet. ut tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, adsequamur super apostolos, sed monet, ut, quoniam nescimus, quando ueniat dominus. in cordis praeparatione imitemur apostolos, unde iam supra satis locutus sum. arguit autem Iudaeos, quare tempus non cognoscant, dicens: Hypocritae, faciem caeli potestis probare et reliqua. quoniam illud tempus non cognoscebant, quod iam uolebat agnosci, id est primi aduentus sui, quo in eum crederent, qui alterum eius aduentum uellent expectare uigilantes, quandocumque futurus esset. qui enim aduentum domini non cognouerit primum, praeparare se non poterit ad secundum credendo in eum fideliterque uigilando, ne illum tamquam fur in tenebris comprehendat, siue tardius uenerit siue citius, quam speratur.

### English translation (Claude)

“Why then,” you say, “does the Lord himself give warning about knowing the times, where he says, ‘Who then is the faithful and wise servant whom his master has set over his household, to give them food in due time?’” and so on. On the contrary, he gives warning not that the good servant should know the end of the times, but that he should be watchful in good works at all times, because he does not know the end of the times. He does not warn us to attain, beyond the apostles, the times which the Father has put in his own power; rather he warns us, since we do not know when the Lord is coming, to imitate the apostles in preparation of heart, of which I have already spoken enough above. And he reproves the Jews for not recognizing the time, saying, “Hypocrites, you can judge the face of the sky,” and so on, because they did not recognize the time he already wished to be recognized, that is, the time of his first coming, so that they might believe in him and so wish to await his second coming watchfully, whenever it should be. For whoever has not recognized the Lord's first coming will not be able to prepare himself for the second by believing in him and watching faithfully, so that it may not overtake him like a thief in the darkness, whether he comes later or sooner than is hoped.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:45: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 12:56: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:45; Luke 12:56; 1 Thess 5:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.6 (CSEL 57:249–250; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-6).

## Letter 199.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-7
- Source: CSEL 57:250
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that Paul's mention of perilous last times does not reveal how long those times will last.

### Latin text

Dicit etiam, sicut admones, apostolus Paulus: In nouissimis temporibus instabunt tempora periculosa et reliqua. sed numquid ideo docet tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate? aut ideo quisquam nouit, quam longa uel breuia sint eadem ipsa, quae fatendum est esse nouissima? cogitare quippe debemus, quam olim dictum sit: Filioli, nouissima hora est.

### English translation (Claude)

The apostle Paul also says, as you remind me: “In the last times perilous times will come,” and so on. But does he therefore teach the times which the Father has put in his own power? Or does anyone therefore know how long or short those very times are which must be admitted to be the last? For we ought to consider how long ago it was said: “Little children, it is the last hour.”

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 3:1; 1 John 2:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.7 (CSEL 57:250; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-7).

## Letter 199.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-8
- Source: CSEL 57:250–251
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine observes that 1 Thessalonians 5 describes how the end will come, not when, and that the cry of "peace and security" is not yet heard.

### Latin text

Rursus eundem apostolum dixisse commemoras: De temporibus autem et momentis non necesse habemus uobis scribere; uos enim ipsi diligenter scitis. quia dies domini sicut fur in nocte ita ueniet. cum dixerint: Pax et securitas, tunc subitaneus illis apparebit interitus quo modo dolores parturientis et non effugient. et hic non dixit. post quantum temporis hoc futurum sit. sed quo modo futurum sit, id est non quanta erit aetatis breuitas uel prolixitas, sed, quantum libet interuallum sit spatiumque temporis, non tamen eis hoc ueniet malum nouissimum, nisi cum dixerint: Pax et securitas. quibus uerbis uidetur apostolus huius nouissimi diei uel spem uel timorem ab hoc nostro tempore remouisse; non enim uidemus ipsos amatores huius saeculi, quibus subitaneus apparebit interitus, iam dicere: Pax et securitas.

### English translation (Claude)

Again you mention that the same apostle said: “But concerning the times and moments we have no need to write to you; for you yourselves know accurately that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. When they say, ‘Peace and security,’ then sudden destruction will appear to them, like the pains of a woman in labor, and they will not escape.” Here too he did not say after how much time this would come, but how it would come; that is, not how short or long the age will be, but that, however long the interval and span of time may be, this final evil will not come upon them until they say, “Peace and security.” By these words the apostle seems to have removed either the hope or the fear of this last day from this time of ours; for we do not see the very lovers of this world, upon whom sudden destruction will appear, already saying, “Peace and security.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:1–3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:1–3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.8 (CSEL 57:250–251; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-8).

## Letter 199.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-9
- Source: CSEL 57:251–252
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Paul told the Thessalonians only what they needed, namely that the Lord's hour will come like a thief, and so kept within Christ's words to the apostles.

### Latin text

Quid ergo scire sufficiat, satis ipse demonstrat apostolus dicendo: De temporibus et momentis non opus habemus uobis scribere uel, sicut alii codices habent: Non opus habetis uobis scribi. nec secutus adiunxit: Vos enim ipsi diligenter scitis, quantum temporis restet, sed ait: Vos enim ipsi diligenter scitis, quia hora domini sicut fur in nocte ita ueniet. hoc ergo scire opus est. ut curent filii lucis esse et parato corde uigilare, qui nolunt ab illa hora sicut a nocturno fure comprehendi. nam si ad cauendum hoc malum, id est ne hora domini tamquam fur inueniat inparatum. opus esset nosse temporum spatia, non diceret apostolus non opus esse, ut hoc scriberet, sed hoc potius eis esse scribendum tamquam doctor prouidentissimus iudicaret. nunc autem nec illis hoc opus esse monstrauit. quibus sufficiebat, ut scirent inparatis atque dormientibus horam domini sicut furem esse uenturam atque hoc sciendo essent ipsi uigilanter parati, post quanta libet tempora ueniret, et suum seruauit modum, ut licet apostolus non tamen praesumeret alios docere, quod apostolis dominum dixisse cognouerat: Non est uestrum scire.

### English translation (Claude)

What it is enough to know, the apostle himself shows clearly enough when he says: “Concerning the times and moments we have no need to write to you,” or, as other manuscripts have it, “You have no need to have anything written to you.” And he did not go on to add, “For you yourselves know accurately how much time remains,” but he said: “For you yourselves know accurately that the hour of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.” This, then, is what one needs to know: that those who do not wish to be overtaken by that hour as by a thief in the night should take care to be sons of light and to watch with a prepared heart. For if, to guard against this evil (that is, lest the hour of the Lord find one unprepared, like a thief), it were necessary to know the spans of the times, the apostle would not say that there was no need for him to write this; rather, like a most provident teacher, he would judge that it ought to be written to them. But in fact he showed that they had no need of this, since it was enough for them to know that the hour of the Lord would come like a thief upon the unprepared and the sleeping, and by knowing this to be themselves watchful and ready, however long afterward it might come. And he kept to his own measure, so that, though an apostle, he did not presume to teach others what he knew the Lord had said to the apostles: “It is not yours to know.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:1–2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:1–2, with a variant reading noted by Augustine; Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.9 (CSEL 57:251–252; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-9).

## Letter 199.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-10
- Source: CSEL 57:252–253
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that the obscure prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2 says nothing about how long the mystery of iniquity will work.

### Latin text

Ponis etiam, quod idem ipse dixit apostolus: Non retinetis memoria, quia, cum essem apud uos, haec dicebam uobis? et nunc quid detineat, scitis, ut reueletur in suo tempore. nam mysterium iam operatur iniquitatis: tantum, qui tenet modo, teneat, donec de medio fiat, et tunc reuelabitur ille iniquus, quem dominus Iesus interficiet spiritu oris sui. quae uerba apostolica utinam non tantum modo poneres, uerum etiam exponere dignareris; ita sane obscura sunt et mystice dicta, ut tamen appareat eum nihil de statutis dixisse temporibus nullumque eorum interuallum spatiumque aperuisse. ait enim: Ut reueletur in suo tempore nec dixit, post quantum temporis hoc futurum sit. deinde subiunxit: Iam enim mysterium operatur iniquitatis. hoc iniquitatis mysterium quo modo libet intellegatur quid sit ab alio sic ab alio autem sic; quam diu tamen operetur, occultum est. neque id expressit apostolus tamquam homo ex eorum numero, quibus dictum est: Non est uestrum scire tempora; quamuis enim nondum inter eos erat, quando eis hoc dictum est, ad eorum tamen collegium atque societatem etiam ipsum non ambigimus pertinere.

### English translation (Claude)

You also cite what the same apostle said: “Do you not remember that when I was with you I told you these things? And now you know what is restraining, so that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of iniquity is already at work; only let him who now restrains restrain until he is taken out of the way, and then that wicked one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth.” I wish you had not merely cited these apostolic words but had also been good enough to explain them; they are indeed so obscure and spoken so mystically, but even so it is plain that he said nothing about fixed times and disclosed no interval or span of them. For he says, “so that he may be revealed in his own time,” and did not say after how much time this would happen. Then he added: “For the mystery of iniquity is already at work.” However this mystery of iniquity may be understood, one person taking it one way and another another, how long it will be at work is hidden. Nor did the apostle state it, as a man belonging to the number of those to whom it was said, “It is not yours to know the times”; for although he was not yet among them when this was said to them, we do not doubt that he too belongs to their college and fellowship.

### Scripture references

- 2 Thess 2:5–8: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Thess 2:5–8; Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.10 (CSEL 57:252–253; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-10).

## Letter 199.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-11
- Source: CSEL 57:253
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says 2 Thessalonians 2 foretells the Antichrist's appearance and destruction but says nothing of when.

### Latin text

Item, quod sequitur: Tantum, qui modo tenet, teneat, donec de medio fiat, et tunc reuelabitur ille iniquus, quem dominus Iesus interficiet spiritu oris sui, docet nos Antichristum manifestum futurum, si quidem ipsum uidetur aliquanto euidentiore significatione tetigisse interficiendum spiritu oris domini Iesu Christi; sed post quantum temporis istuc erit, nec saltem obscure locutus est. quisnam sit enim, qui modo tenet, uel quid teneat uel quid sibi uelit, quod ait: De medio fiat, potest quisque se coartare, ut intellegat uel aliquatenus suspicetur, quoniam quoquo modo scriptum legit; quam diu autem teneat et post quanta temporum spatia de medio fiat, hic tacetur omnino.

### English translation (Claude)

Likewise what follows, “Only let him who now restrains restrain until he is taken out of the way, and then that wicked one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth,” teaches us that the Antichrist will be manifest, since he seems to have touched on him with a somewhat clearer indication as the one to be slain by the breath of the mouth of the Lord Jesus Christ; but after how much time this will be, he did not say even obscurely. For who it is that now restrains, or what he restrains, or what is meant by his saying, “until he is taken out of the way,” anyone may exert himself to understand or in some degree to conjecture, since he reads it written in one way or another; but how long he restrains, and after how great spans of time he is taken out of the way, is here passed over in complete silence.

### Scripture references

- 2 Thess 2:7–8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Thess 2:7–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.11 (CSEL 57:253; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-11).

## Letter 199.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-12
- Source: CSEL 57:253–254
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies that Christ's rebuke of Jerusalem and the saying "the times are fulfilled" concern his first coming and the fall of Jerusalem, not the second coming.

### Latin text

Item dominus, inquis, in euangelio increpat Iudaeos dicens: Et tu, si cognouisses tempus uisitationis tuae, forsitan permansisses; nunc autem absconsa sunt ab oculis tuis. sed hoc ad tempus primi aduentus domini pertinet, non secundi, de quo nunc quaestio est. de secundo quippe aduentu suo dixit: Non est uestrum scire tempora, non de primo: de illo enim ab eo quaesierunt discipuli, quem sperabant, non de isto, quem iam uidebant. si enim primum eius aduentum Iudaei cognouissent, numquam dominum gloriae crucifixissent et ideo non euerti sed permanere potuissent. iam uero quod ait ad eos: Paenitentiam agite, completa sunt tempora, credite in euangelio, etiam ipse firmasti de his temporibus dictum esse Iudaeorum, quae continuo post paucos annos fuerant transitura et nunc nouimus iam esse transacta euersa scilicet ciuitate, in qua regnum eorum fuerat constitutum.

### English translation (Claude)

Again, you say, the Lord in the gospel rebukes the Jews, saying: “And you, if you had known the time of your visitation, perhaps you would have remained; but now it is hidden from your eyes.” But this concerns the time of the Lord's first coming, not his second, which is the question now. For it was of his second coming that he said, “It is not yours to know the times,” not of his first; for it was about the coming they were hoping for that the disciples asked him, not about the one they were already seeing. For if the Jews had recognized his first coming, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory, and so they could have remained and not been overthrown. And as to what he says to them, “Repent, the times are fulfilled; believe in the gospel,” you yourself have affirmed that it was said of the times of the Jews, which were to pass away a few years later, and which we now know have passed away, namely with the overthrow of the city in which their kingdom had been established.

### Scripture references

- Luke 19:44: quotation, medium confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:8: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 1:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 19:42–44 (free form, as in Letter 198.3); Acts 1:7; 1 Cor 2:8; Mark 1:15. The “overthrow of the city” is the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.12 (CSEL 57:253–254; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-12).

## Letter 199.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-13
- Source: CSEL 57:254
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Hesychius to show how the visions of Daniel 7 reveal the time of Christ's coming, if he can.

### Latin text

Proinde, quod ex Danihelo de interfecta bestia posuit uenerabilitas tua et de reliquarum bestiarum regno et inter haec de filio hominis ueniente cum nubibus caeli, manifestum esse dixisti intellegentibus scripturam. sed si fueris dignatus exponere, quo modo ista pertineant ad cognoscendum temporum spatium, post quod erit saluatoris aduentus, ita ut inueniantur sine ulla ambiguitate manifesta, fatebor etiam ipse cum magna actione gratiarum illud, quod ait dominus: Non est uestrum scire tempora, tantum modo apostolis esse dictum, non posteris eorum, qui ea fuerant cognituri.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, as to what Your Venerableness cited from Daniel about the beast that was slain and the dominion of the other beasts, and between these about the Son of Man coming with the clouds of heaven, you said it was plain to those who understand the Scripture. But if you are good enough to explain how these things bear on knowing the span of time after which the Savior's coming will take place, in such a way that they are found plain without any ambiguity, I too will confess, with great thanksgiving, that what the Lord said, “It is not yours to know the times,” was said only to the apostles, not to their successors, who were to know them.

### Scripture references

- Dan 7:11–13: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Dan 7:11–13; Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.13 (CSEL 57:254; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-13).

## Letter 199.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-14
- Source: CSEL 57:254–255
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine restates the Scripture passages Hesychius cited on the blessedness of those who love Christ's coming.

### Latin text

Diligendus ergo est et expectandus domini, sicut sancte hortaris, aduentus, magnam dicens esse beatitudinem diligentibus eius aduentum et adhibens apostoli testimonium, cuius uerba sic ponis: De cetero reposita est mihi corona iustitiae, quam reddet mihi dominus iustus iudex in illa die, non solum autem mihi sed et his, qui diligunt aduentum domini. tunc enim, sicut ex euangelio commemoras. iusti fulgebunt sicut sol in regno patris sui: et quod propheta dicit: Ecce enim caligo et tenebrae operient terram super gentes; in te uero apparebit dominus et maiestas eius in te uidebitur; item quod scriptum est: Qui uero expectant dominum. exultabunt cum uirtute, producent pennas sicut aquilae, current et non laborabunt, ambulabunt et non esurient.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord's coming, then, is to be loved and awaited, as you exhort us in a holy way, saying that there is great blessedness for those who love his coming, and bringing forward the testimony of the apostle, whose words you cite thus: “For the rest, there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me on that day, and not only to me but also to those who love the Lord's coming.” For then, as you recall from the gospel, “the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father”; and there is what the prophet says: “For behold, gloom and darkness will cover the earth, over the nations; but upon you the Lord will appear, and his majesty will be seen upon you”; and likewise what is written: “But those who wait for the Lord will exult in strength; they will put forth wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary; they will walk and not hunger.”

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 4:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 13:43: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 60:2: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 4:8; Matt 13:43; Isa 60:2; Isa 40:31, as cited in Letter 198.4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.14 (CSEL 57:254–255; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-14).

## Letter 199.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-15
- Source: CSEL 57:255–256
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that love of Christ's coming lies in awaiting it with faith, hope, and love, not in asserting that it is near or far.

### Latin text

Hoc plane piissime et uerissime dicis commendans eorum beatitudinem. qui diligunt aduentum domini. sed et illi, quibus dicebat apostolus: Non cito moueamini mente, quasi instet dies domini, diligebant utique aduentum domini nec eos hoc dicens doctor gentium ab illa dilectione frangebat. qua ut inflammarentur, uolebat; et ideo nolebat, ut crederent eis, a quibus audiebant instare diem domini, ne forte, cum transisset tempus, quo eum crediderant esse uenturum, et uenisse non cernerent, etiam cetera fallaciter sibi promitti arbitrantes et de ipsa mercede fidei desperarent. non ergo ille diligit aduentum domini, qui eum adserit propinquare, nec ille, qui eum adserit non propinquare, sed ille potius, qui eum, siue prope siue longe sit, sinceritate fidei, firmitate spei, ardore caritatis expectat. nam si tanto magis diligitur dominus, quanto magis creditur et praedicatur citius esse uenturus, magis eum diligebant, qui eius aduentum iam instare dicebant, quam hi, quos apostolus eis credere prohibebat, uel ipse apostolus, qui hoc utique non credebat.

### English translation (Claude)

This you say most devoutly and most truly, commending the blessedness of those who love the Lord's coming. But those too to whom the apostle said, “Do not be quickly shaken in mind, as though the day of the Lord were at hand,” certainly loved the Lord's coming, and the teacher of the Gentiles, in saying this, was not breaking them away from that love, with which he wanted them to be set on fire. And for this reason he did not want them to believe those from whom they heard that the day of the Lord was at hand, lest perhaps, when the time had passed at which they had believed he would come and they saw that he had not come, they should think that the other things too were falsely promised them and despair of the very reward of faith. So it is not the one who asserts that the Lord's coming is near who loves it, nor the one who asserts that it is not near, but rather the one who awaits it, whether it be near or far, with sincerity of faith, firmness of hope, and ardor of love. For if the Lord is loved the more, the more he is believed and preached to be coming soon, then those who said his coming was already at hand loved him more than those whom the apostle forbade to believe them, or than the apostle himself, who certainly did not believe it.

### Scripture references

- 2 Thess 2:2: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Thess 2:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.15 (CSEL 57:255–256; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-15).

## Letter 199.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-16
- Source: CSEL 57:256–257
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Hesychius whether he thinks the time of the end can be defined at least approximately, and if so, on what grounds.

### Latin text

Si autem onerosa non est infirmitas mea sanctitati tuae, peto apertius non graueris exponere, quo modo dixeris neminem posse temporum mensuras colligere, ne forte hoc et mihi uideatur, quod etiam caritati tuae, et frustra quilibet nostrum instrui expectet ab altero. cum hoc enim dixisses. deinde subdidisti et aisti: Euangelium quidem dicit: De die et hora nemo scit, ego autem, inquis, pro inpossibilitate intellectus mei dico neque mensem neque annum aduentus ipsius sciri posse. ita enim hoc uidetur sonare, tamquam non possit sciri, quo anno uenturus sit, sed possit sciri, qua hebdomade annorum uel qua decade, tamquam dici possit atque definiri intra illos uel illos septem annos aut intra illos uel illos decem annos. quod si ne hoc quidem comprehendi potest, quaero. utrum sic saltem possit definiri tempus aduentus eius, ut eum uenturum esse dicamus intra istos uerbi gratia quinquaginta uel centum annos uel quotlibet seu maioris numeri seu minoris annorum. sed, in quo eorum, nos ignorare. hoc si iam comprehendisti, multum est, quod comprehendere potuisti. id ipsum est autem, quod rogo ut uobis benignus impertias adhibens idonea documenta, quibus id potueris indagare: si autem neque hoc te comprehendisse praesumis, hoc sentis, quod ego.

### English translation (Claude)

But if my weakness is not burdensome to Your Holiness, I ask you not to mind explaining more clearly how you said that no one can gather the measures of the times, lest perhaps I too should think what Your Charity thinks, and each of us should vainly wait to be instructed by the other. For after you had said this, you then added: “The gospel indeed says, ‘Of the day and hour no one knows,’ and I,” you say, “for the incapacity of my understanding, say that neither the month nor the year of his coming can be known.” For this seems to sound as though it cannot be known in which year he will come, but it can be known in which week of years or in which decade, as though it could be said and defined as within this or that seven years, or within this or that ten years. But if not even this can be grasped, I ask whether the time of his coming can at least be defined in such a way that we say he will come within, for example, these fifty or a hundred years, or any number of years, greater or smaller, but that we do not know in which of them. If you have already grasped this, it is a great thing that you have been able to grasp. And that is precisely what I ask you kindly to share with us, bringing forward suitable proofs by which you were able to search it out. But if you do not presume to have grasped even this, you think what I think.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Letter 198.5 (Matt 24:36).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.16 (CSEL 57:256–257; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-16).

## Letter 199.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-17
- Source: CSEL 57:257–258
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that John's "last hour" has already lasted centuries, and mentions those who treat six thousand years as a day of twelve hours.

### Latin text

Nouissima enim esse ista tempora multis rerum signis apparentibus, quae dominum praedixisse legimus, omnes, qui ea credimus, cernimus. sed et mille annorum tempus, si eorum finis esset saeculi finis, posset uniuersum dici nouissimum tempus uel etiam nouissimus dies, quia scriptum est: Mille anni ante oculos tuos tamquam dies unus, ut, quicquid per eosdem mille annos gereretur, nouissimo tempore uel nouissimo die diceretur geri. iterum enim dico, quod in hac causa saepe dicendum est: consideremus, ante quam multos annos dixerit beatus Iohannes euangelista: Nouissima hora est. nam si tunc essemus, hoc audito quando crederemus tot annos postea transituros ac non potius ipso adhuc Iohanne in corpore constituto dominum speraremus esse uenturum? neque enim dixit nouissimum tempus est aut nouissimus annus aut mensis aut dies, sed: Nouissima hora est. et ecce ista hora quam longa est! nec tamen est ille mentitus, sed utique intellegendus est horam pro tempore posuisse. quod nonnulli sic accipiunt, ut sex annorum milia constituant uelut unum diem eumque in partes uelut horas duodecim partiantur. ut sic quingentos annos postremos hora uideatur habere postrema; in quibus annis iam Iohannes, inquiunt, loquebatur, quando nouissimam horam esse dicebat.

### English translation (Claude)

For that these are the last times, all of us who believe the signs that we read the Lord foretold see from the many signs of things that are appearing. But even a period of a thousand years, if its end were the end of the age, could as a whole be called the last time, or even the last day, because it is written, “A thousand years in your eyes are as one day,” so that whatever was done during those thousand years would be said to be done in the last time or on the last day. For I say again what must often be said in this matter: let us consider how many years ago the blessed John the evangelist said, “It is the last hour.” For if we had lived then, on hearing this, when would we have believed that so many years would pass afterward, and would we not rather have hoped that the Lord would come while John himself was still in the body? For he did not say, “It is the last time,” or “the last year,” or “month,” or “day,” but, “It is the last hour.” And see how long that hour is! And yet he did not lie; but he certainly must be understood to have put “hour” for “time.” Some take this in such a way that they set six thousand years as one day and divide it into twelve parts, as it were hours, so that the last hour seems to contain the final five hundred years; and during those years, they say, John was already speaking when he said it was the last hour.

### Scripture references

- Ps 90:4 (89:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 90:4; 1 John 2:18. The world-week scheme of six thousand years was common in early Christian chronography.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.17 (CSEL 57:257–258; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/198-1/#p-199-17).

## Letter 199.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-18
- Source: CSEL 57:258–259
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the schemes dividing world history into hours fail on their own terms, and that John's "hour" means an unknown time.

### Latin text

Sed aliud est nosse aliquid aliud suspicari. cur enim non potius, si sex annorum milia deputandus est unus dies, non duodecima sed uicesima quarta pars eius una hora est, id est non quingenti sed ducenti quinquaginta anni? totus enim dies, totus circuitus solis uerius nuncupatur non ab oriente usque in occidentem sed ab oriente usque in orientem, unde toto die peracto. id est uiginti et quattuor horis rursus exoritur. ac per hoc hora ista nouissima, ex quo tempore id locutus est Iohannes, ante ferme septuaginta annos ut minimum iam reperitur esse transacta et nondum uenit terminus saeculi. huc accedit, quia inspecta diligenter ecclesiastica historia reperitur apostolus Iohannes longe ante fuisse defunctus, quam quinque milia quingenti anni a generis humani exordio complerentur. nondum erat itaque hora nouissima, si sex milium annorum pars duodecima, id est quingenti anni uel unius horae spatium deputatur. porro si secundum scripturas unum diem mille annos esse ponamus, multo magis olim transiit tam longae diei hora nouissima; non dico, si uicesima quarta pars eius, qui sunt anni paulo amplius quadraginta, sed si duodecima deputetur, quae illos annos duplos habet. unde conuenientius ille apostolus creditur horam posuisse pro tempore, quae hora quam longa sit, ignoramus, quia non est nostrum scire tempora. quae pater posuit in sua potestate. quamuis eam nouissimam nouerimus multo magis utique nos, quam qui fuerunt ante nos, ex quo esse uel diei coepit hora nouissima.

### English translation (Claude)

But it is one thing to know something, another to conjecture it. For if six thousand years are to be reckoned as one day, why is one hour not rather its twenty-fourth part instead of its twelfth, that is, not five hundred but two hundred and fifty years? For a whole day, a whole circuit of the sun, is more truly so called not from east to west but from east to east, where, when the whole day is complete, that is, after twenty-four hours, it rises again. And on this reckoning, that last hour, counted from the time when John said it, is found to have already passed at least some seventy years ago, and the end of the age has not yet come. Add to this that, when church history is carefully examined, the apostle John is found to have died long before five thousand five hundred years from the beginning of the human race were completed. So it was not yet the last hour, if the twelfth part of six thousand years, that is, five hundred years, is reckoned as the span of one hour. Furthermore, if according to the Scriptures we take one day to be a thousand years, much more did the last hour of so long a day pass long ago: I do not say if it is reckoned as its twenty-fourth part, which is a little more than forty years, but even if as its twelfth, which has twice those years. Hence it is more fitting to believe that the apostle put “hour” for “time,” and how long that hour is we do not know, because it is not ours to know the times which the Father has put in his own power; although we know it to be the last, and we much more certainly than those who were before us, since the last hour of the day, or whatever it is, began.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Pet 3:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:7; 2 Pet 3:8 (Ps 90:4). The final clause (ex quo esse uel diei coepit hora nouissima) is obscure in the digital text and is translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.18 (CSEL 57:258–259; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-18).

## Letter 199.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-19
- Source: CSEL 57:259–260
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the shortening of the days cannot mean that Daniel's numbered weeks would be falsified, since the prophecy itself would then be untrue.

### Latin text

Quod autem ideo uidetur uenerationi tuae comprehendi non posse temporum mensuras, ut definiatur, quo anno futurus est finis, quia secundum promissionem domini breuiabuntur dies illi, prorsus non intellego. si enim sic breuiabuntur, ut fiant ex pluribus pauciores, quaero, secundum quam ueritatem futuri erant plures. nisi breuiarentur? hebdomades enim sancti Danihelis non ad primum domini aduentum, sicut pluribus uisum est, sed ad secundum potius existimas pertinere. itane ergo breuiabuntur. ut uel una in eis hebdomada minus futura sit, et falsa erit prophetia, quae tanta diligentia numerum hebdomadarum definire curauit, ut quiddam diceret etiam dimidio hebdomadis implendum? miror, si per prophetiam Christi destruitur prophetia Danihelis. deinde quale est, ut putemus ignorasse Danihelem uel potius angelum, a quo ista discebat. breuiaturum dominum dies illos et errasse, ut hoc diceret, uel scisse quidem, sed ei, quem docebat, fuisse mentitum? quod si absurdum est, cur non potius credimus secundum id. quod breuiaturus est dominus dies illos, tot hebdomadas prophetasse Danihelem, si tamen ad secundum domini aduentum. quod nescio quem ad modum possit ostendi, ille numerus refertur annorum?

### English translation (Claude)

But I do not understand at all why it seems to Your Reverence that the measures of the times cannot be grasped so as to define in which year the end will come, because, according to the Lord's promise, those days will be shortened. For if they are to be shortened in such a way that from more they become fewer, I ask: according to what truth would they have been more, if they were not shortened? For you think that the weeks of the holy Daniel refer not to the Lord's first coming, as has seemed to most, but rather to his second. Will they then be shortened so that there will be even one week fewer among them, and the prophecy will be false that took such care to define the number of the weeks that it even said that something was to be fulfilled in the half of a week? I would be surprised if Daniel's prophecy were destroyed by Christ's prophecy. Then, what would it mean for us to think that Daniel, or rather the angel from whom he was learning these things, did not know that the Lord would shorten those days, and erred in saying this, or knew it indeed but lied to the one he was teaching? If this is absurd, why do we not rather believe that Daniel prophesied that many weeks in accordance with the Lord's intention to shorten those days, if indeed that number of years refers to the Lord's second coming, which I do not know how it could be shown?

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:22: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 9:24–27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:22; Dan 9:24–27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.19 (CSEL 57:259–260; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-19).

## Letter 199.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-20
- Source: CSEL 57:260–261
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reasons that if Daniel's weeks referred to the second coming, one could confidently say it would come within seventy to a hundred years, since shortening could only make the time less.

### Latin text

Postremo multo certius securiusque dicitur domini aduentum intra septuaginta aut ut plurimum intra centum annos futurum, si hebdomades istae ipsum praenuntiant. anni enim quadringenti nonaginta sunt in hebdomadibus septuaginta; a natiuitate autem domini hodie computantur anni ferme quadringenti uiginti, a resurrectione autem uel ascensione eius anni plus minus trecenti nonaginta. ac per hoc, si, ex quo natus est. computetur, septuaginta sunt reliqui, si, ex quo passus est, circiter centum remanent, intra quos Danihelis omnes hebdomades, si de nouissimo eius aduentu prophetatae sunt, implebuntur. qui ergo dicit: Intra tot annos erit, tunc falsum dicit, si ultra erit; sed quia breuiabuntur, pauciores poterunt esse, non plures. recte itaque dicitur: Intra hos erit, quoniam, quantum libet breuientur, uerum erit: ipsa namque breuiatio si eo modo intellegenda est. ut pauciores fiant, ultra eos diem domini uenire non patitur sed magis magisque intra eos, quanto fuerint pauciores. non igitur ista breuiatio turbat computatorem. qui eo modo definierit, ut dicat intra tot annos diem domini esse uenturum, sed adiuuat potius, quoniam, quanto magis ad paucitatem redigentur dies, tanto magis intra erit et ultra esse non poterit. atque ideo uerum erit, quod ita definitur, ut dicatur: Intra tot annos erit, quamuis nesciatur, quo anno futurum sit.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, it would be said much more certainly and safely that the Lord's coming will be within seventy, or at most within a hundred, years, if these weeks foretell it. For there are four hundred and ninety years in seventy weeks; and from the Lord's birth to today about four hundred and twenty years are counted, and from his resurrection or ascension about three hundred and ninety, more or less. And so, if it is counted from when he was born, seventy remain; if from when he suffered, about a hundred remain, within which all of Daniel's weeks will be fulfilled, if they were prophesied of his last coming. So whoever says, “It will be within so many years,” says what is false only if it will be beyond them; but since the days will be shortened, they can be fewer, not more. So it is rightly said, “It will be within these years,” because, however much they are shortened, it will be true; for the shortening itself, if it is to be understood as making them fewer, does not allow the day of the Lord to come beyond those years, but more and more within them, the fewer they become. So this shortening does not upset the calculator who defines it in such a way as to say that the day of the Lord will come within so many years, but rather helps him, since the more the days are reduced in number, the more it will be within, and it cannot be beyond. And therefore what is defined in such a way as to say, “It will be within so many years,” will be true, even though it is not known in which year it will happen.

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Dan 9:24; Matt 24:22. Augustine reckons about 420 years from Christ's birth, dating this letter to about AD 419.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.20 (CSEL 57:260–261; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-20).

## Letter 199.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-21
- Source: CSEL 57:261–262
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that most expositors have shown Daniel's weeks fulfilled at Christ's first coming, especially in the anointing and slaying of the Messiah.

### Latin text

Proinde tota quaestio est, utrum Danihelis hebdomades primo aduentu domini impletae sint, an finem saeculi prophetauerint, an ad utrumque pertineant; neque enim, qui etiam hoc saperent, defuerunt dicentes tempore primi aduentus Christi esse completas et inde usque ad finem saeculi totidem rursus esse complendas. equidem uideo, quia, si primus eas non compleuit aduentus, necesse est, ut secundus eas compleat, quoniam prophetia illa esse non potest falsa. quae si tempore primi aduentus impleta est, non cogit intellegi, quod etiam de fine saeculi implebitur. ac per hoc incertum est, etiam si uerum est, neque negandum quidem sed neque praesumendum est id futurum. relinquitur itaque, ut, qui uult cogere istam prophetiam credi saeculi fine complendam, contendat. quantum potest, et ostendat, si potest, primo aduentu domini non fuisse completam contra tot expositores diuinorum eloquiorum, qui hanc non solum computatione temporum uerum etiam rebus ipsis completam fuisse demonstrant, maxime quod ibi scriptum est: Et unguetur sanctus sanctorum uel propter quod in eadem prophetia Hebraei codices expressius habent: Occidetur Christus et non erit eius, id est non erit eius ciuitatis, quoniam sic alienatus est a Iudaeis, qui eum propterea saluatorem redemptoremque suum non esse crediderunt. quia occidere potuerunt. neque enim in fine saeculi ungendus aut occidendus est Christus, ut ista prophetia Danihelis tunc expectetur implenda, nondum credatur impleta.

### English translation (Claude)

The whole question, then, is whether Daniel's weeks were fulfilled at the Lord's first coming, or prophesied the end of the age, or refer to both; for there have not been lacking those who held this too, saying that they were completed at the time of Christ's first coming and that the same number are to be completed again from then until the end of the age. For my part, I see that if the first coming did not fulfil them, the second must necessarily fulfil them, since that prophecy cannot be false. But if it was fulfilled at the time of the first coming, it does not compel us to understand that it will also be fulfilled at the end of the age. And so it is uncertain, even if it is true; and it should not be denied, but neither should it be presumed that it will happen. It remains, therefore, that whoever wishes to compel belief that this prophecy is to be fulfilled at the end of the age must strive as much as he can, and show, if he can, that it was not fulfilled at the Lord's first coming, against so many expositors of the divine words who show that it was fulfilled not only by the reckoning of the times but also by the events themselves, especially in what is written there, “And the Holy of Holies will be anointed,” or because in the same prophecy the Hebrew manuscripts say more explicitly, “Christ will be slain and will not be his,” that is, the city will not be his, since he was so estranged from the Jews, who for this reason did not believe he was their Savior and Redeemer, because they were able to kill him. For Christ is not to be anointed or slain at the end of the age, so that this prophecy of Daniel should be expected to be fulfilled then and believed not yet fulfilled.

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:24: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Dan 9:24, 26. “Christ will be slain and will not be his” follows Jerome's rendering of the Hebrew (Vulgate: occidetur Christus et non erit eius); Augustine's explanation that “his” refers to the city is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.21 (CSEL 57:261–262; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-21).

## Letter 199.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-22
- Source: CSEL 57:262–263
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine agrees that the end grows nearer daily, but notes that Paul's descriptions of the last times already applied in his own day.

### Latin text

Quod autem de signis euangelicis et propheticis, quae fieri cernimus. propinquum domini aduentum sperare debeamus, quis negat? cotidie quippe magis magisque fit proximus. sed quanto interuallo propinquet, hoc, dictum est, non est uestrum scire. uide, quando dixit apostolus: Nunc enim propior est nostra salus, quam cum credidimus; nox praecessit, dies autem adpropinquauit. et ecce quot anni transierunt! nec tamen, quod dixit, falsum est. quanto magis nunc dicendum est propinquare domini aduentum, quando tantus est ad finem factus accessus! apostolus certe: Spiritus, inquit, manifeste dicit. quia in nouissimis temporibus recedent quidam a fide. nondum utique erant eadem tempora haereticorum scilicet et talium. quales eodem sermone describit, sed iam uenerunt. ac per hoc in nouissimis temporibus uidemur etiam per ipsos de fine saeculi commoneri. itemque alibi dicens: Hoc autem scitote, quoniam in nouissimis diebus instabunt tempora saeua uel, sicut alii codices habent, periculosa, deinde, qualia futura sint, exprimens: Erunt enim homines. inquit, se ipsos amantes, amatores pecuniae, elati, superbi, blasphemi, parentibus non oboedientes. ingrati, scelesti, inreligiosi, sine affectione, detractores, incontinentes, inmites, sine benignitate, proditores, procaces, caecati, uoluptatium amatores magis quam dei, habentes speciem pietatis, uirtutem autem eius abnegantes. mirum, si tales homines aliquando defuerunt. denique, quia et tunc erant, adiungit ac dicit: Et hos deuita; ex his enim sunt, qui penetrant domos. non ait penetrabunt tamquam et hic futurum praenuntians, sicut supra dixerat: Instabunt tempora periculosa, sed ait: Penetrant domos et captiuas ducunt mulierculas; non ait ducent uel ducturi sunt sed iam ducunt.

### English translation (Claude)

But who denies that from the signs of the gospels and the prophets, which we see taking place, we ought to hope that the Lord's coming is near? For it becomes nearer and nearer every day. But by how long an interval it is drawing near, of this it was said, “It is not yours to know.” See when the apostle said, “For now our salvation is nearer than when we believed; the night is far gone, the day is at hand.” And look how many years have passed! And yet what he said is not false. How much more must it be said now that the Lord's coming is near, when so great an advance toward the end has been made! The apostle certainly says: “The Spirit expressly says that in the last times some will depart from the faith.” Those times of heretics, and of such people as he describes in the same passage, had certainly not yet come; but now they have come. And so in the last times we seem to be reminded of the end of the age even by them. And likewise elsewhere he says: “But know this, that in the last days savage times will come,” or, as other manuscripts have it, “perilous times”; and then, describing what they will be like, he says: “For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, wicked, irreligious, without affection, slanderers, without self-control, savage, without kindness, traitors, reckless, blinded, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness but denying its power.” It would be remarkable if such men were ever lacking! And indeed, because there were such men even then, he adds and says: “And avoid these; for among them are those who make their way into houses.” He does not say “will make their way,” as though foretelling this too as future, as he had said above, “perilous times will come,” but he says, “make their way into houses and lead captive weak women”; he does not say “will lead” or “are going to lead,” but “already lead.”

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 13:11–12: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 4:1: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:1–6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:7; Rom 13:11–12; 1 Tim 4:1; 2 Tim 3:1–6 (with a variant reading noted by Augustine).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.22 (CSEL 57:262–263; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-22).

## Letter 199.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-23
- Source: CSEL 57:263–264
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the wicked of the last days will multiply as the end approaches, and that Peter already spoke of "the last days" at Pentecost.

### Latin text

Nec putandus est hoc loco pro temporis futuri uerbis praesentis temporis uerba posuisse, quando quidem illos ab eo, cui scribit, euitari admonebat. nec tamen frustra dixit: In nouissimis diebus instabunt tempora periculosa et hinc ea periculosa futura demonstrans tales homines futuros esse praedixit, nisi quia tanto plures erunt magisque abundabunt, quanto magis propinquatur ad finem. uidemus ergo tales nunc abundare. sed quid, si abundantiores erunt post nos et omnino abundantissimi, quando iam iamque ipse finis instabit, qui quam diu aberit, ignoratur? nouissimi quippe dies dicti sunt et in ipsis primis apostolorum diebus, cum domini in caelum recens esset ascensus, quando die pentecostes misit promissum spiritum sanctum et quidam stupebant admirantes eos, qui linguis, quas non didicerant, loquebantur, quidam uero inridentes musto plenos esse dicebant. quo die Petrus loquens ad illos, qui de hac re uarie mouebantur: Non enim, sicut, inquit, suspicamini, ebrii sunt isti, cum sit hora diei tertia. sed adtendite, quoniam hoc est, quod dictum est per prophetam: Erit in nouissimis diebus, dicit dominus, effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem et cetera.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should it be thought that in this place he put present-tense words for future-tense words, since he was warning the man to whom he was writing to avoid them. And yet he did not say in vain, “In the last days perilous times will come,” and, showing from this that they would be perilous, foretell that there would be such men, except that they will be the more numerous and abound the more, the nearer we come to the end. We see, then, that such men abound now. But what if they will be more abundant after us, and most abundant of all when the end itself is just about to arrive, how far off it is being unknown? For the last days were spoken of even in the very first days of the apostles, when the Lord's ascension into heaven was recent, when on the day of Pentecost he sent the promised Holy Spirit, and some were amazed, marveling at those who spoke in languages they had not learned, while others mockingly said they were full of new wine. On that day Peter, speaking to those who were variously affected by this, said: “For these men are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is the third hour of the day; but take note, for this is what was spoken by the prophet: ‘In the last days it shall be, says the Lord, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh,’” and so on.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 3:1: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 2:13: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:15–17: quotation, high confidence
- Joel 2:28 (3:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 3:1; Acts 2:1–17 (Joel 2:28).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.23 (CSEL 57:263–264; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-23).

## Letter 199.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-24
- Source: CSEL 57:264–265
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that every generation since the apostles lives in the last days, but how far off the final day is cannot be known.

### Latin text

Iam tunc ergo erant dies nouissimi; quanto magis nunc, etiamsi tantum dierum remansit usque in finem, quantum ad hunc diem a domini ascensione transactum est, uel aliquid siue minus restet siue amplius! quod profecto nescimus, quia non est nostrum scire tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, cum tamen sciamus in nouissimis temporibus, in nouissimis diebus, in nouissima hora nos agere sicut apostoli sed multo magis, qui fuerant post illos ante nos, et multo magis nos et magis quam nos. qui erunt post nos, donec ad illos ueniatur, qui erunt, si dici potest, nouissimorum nouissimi, atque ad ipsum omnino nouissimum, quem uult intellegi dominus, ubi dicit: Et resuscitabo eum in nouissimo die. qui quam longe absit, comprehendi non potest.

### English translation (Claude)

Already then, therefore, these were the last days; how much more now, even if as many days remain until the end as have passed from the Lord's ascension to this day, or whether somewhat less or more remains! This we certainly do not know, because it is not ours to know the times which the Father has put in his own power, although we do know that we are living in the last times, in the last days, in the last hour, as the apostles did, but much more those who were after them and before us, and much more we, and more than we those who will be after us, until it comes to those who will be, if one may say so, the last of the last, and to that very last of all, which the Lord wishes to be understood when he says, “And I will raise him up on the last day.” How far off this is cannot be grasped.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:40: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:7; John 6:40, 44.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.24 (CSEL 57:264–265; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-24).

## Letter 199.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-25
- Source: CSEL 57:265–266
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ's discourse in the Synoptic Gospels concerns three things: the destruction of Jerusalem, his coming through the Church, and his final coming.

### Latin text

Signa, quae in euangelio futura praedicta sunt, sicut commemorat sanctitas tua, secundum Lucam, eadem sunt secundum Matthaeum et secundum Marcum. hi enim tres narrant. quae dixerit dominus, cum interrogatus esset a discipulis suis. quando futura essent, quae de templi euersione praedixerat, et quod signum esset aduentus eius et consummationis saeculi. non enim discrepant rebus, si alius aliquid dicit, quod alius tacet aut alio modo dicit; magis autem conlata inuicem iuuant. ut legentis intellectus regatur. sed de omnibus disputare nunc longum est. interrogantibus enim dominus ea respondit, quae iam ex illo tempore fuerant secutura. siue de excidio Hierusalem. unde orta est ipsius interrogationis occasio, siue de aduentu suo per ecclesiam, in qua usque ad finem uenire non cessat — in suis enim ueniens agnoscitur, dum eius cotidie membra nascuntur, de quo aduentu ait: Amodo uidebitis filium hominis uenientem in nubibus, de quibus nubibus dictum est per prophetam: Mandabo nubibus meis, ne pluant super eam — siue de ipso fine, in quo apparebit uiuos iudicaturus et mortuos.

### English translation (Claude)

The signs foretold in the gospel according to Luke, as Your Holiness mentions, are the same as those in Matthew and in Mark. For these three relate what the Lord said when he was asked by his disciples when the things he had foretold about the overthrow of the temple would take place, and what the sign would be of his coming and of the consummation of the age. For they do not disagree in substance if one says something another omits or says it in another way; rather, compared with one another they help, so that the reader's understanding is guided. But to discuss them all now would take long. For in answer to their questions the Lord replied with the things that were to follow from that time on: whether about the destruction of Jerusalem, from which the occasion for the question itself arose; or about his coming through the Church, in which he does not cease to come until the end (for he is recognized as coming in his own, while his members are born every day; of this coming he says, “From now on you will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds,” of which clouds it was said through the prophet, “I will command my clouds not to rain on it”); or about the end itself, at which he will appear to judge the living and the dead.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:3: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:64: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 5:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:1: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:3 (cf. Mark 13:4; Luke 21:7); Matt 26:64; Isa 5:6; the last phrase echoes the creed (2 Tim 4:1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.25 (CSEL 57:265–266; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-25).

## Letter 199.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-26
- Source: CSEL 57:266–267
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that the signs in Christ's discourse must be carefully assigned to the fall of Jerusalem, his coming in the Church, or his final coming.

### Latin text

Cum itaque signa dicat, quae ad ista tria pertinent, id est ad excidium illius ciuitatis, ad aduentum eius in corpore suo, quod est ecclesia, ad aduentum eius in capite ecclesiae, quod est ipse, quid eorum signorum ad quid horum trium referendum sit, diligenti consideratione cernendum est, ne forte, quod pertinet ad euersionem Hierusalem, ad finem saeculi referendum putemus aut e contrario, quod ad finem saeculi pertinet, adfirmemus ad ciuitatis illius excidium pertinere aut, quod pertinet ad eius aduentum in corpore suo, quod est ecclesia, dicamus pertinere ad eius aduentum nouissimum in corpore suo, quod est caput ecclesiae, aut rursus, quod pertinet ad aduentum eius nouissimum per se ipsum, ad eum pertinere adseueremus aduentum, qui est per ecclesiam. in quibus omnibus sunt quaedam manifesta, quaedam uero sic obscura, ut uel laboriosum sit ea diiudicare uel temerarium, quam diu non intelleguntur, de his aliquid definire.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, he speaks of signs that relate to these three, that is, to the destruction of that city, to his coming in his body, which is the Church, and to his coming in the head of the Church, which is himself, one must discern with careful consideration which of these signs is to be referred to which of these three, lest perhaps we think what belongs to the overthrow of Jerusalem should be referred to the end of the age, or, on the contrary, assert that what belongs to the end of the age belongs to the destruction of that city; or say that what belongs to his coming in his body, which is the Church, belongs to his last coming in his body that is the head of the Church; or again insist that what belongs to his last coming in his own person belongs to the coming that is through the Church. Among all these, some things are plain, but some are so obscure that it is either laborious to decide them or rash to define anything about them so long as they are not understood.

### Scripture references

- Col 1:18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 1:18; Eph 1:22–23. The phrase “in his body, which is the head of the Church” is so in the text (in corpore suo, quod est caput ecclesiae), meaning Christ's own body as head.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.26 (CSEL 57:266–267; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-26).

## Letter 199.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-27
- Source: CSEL 57:267–268
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows from Luke's parallel that the warning to pregnant and nursing women, ambiguous in Matthew and Mark, refers to the destruction of Jerusalem.

### Latin text

Quis enim non uideat ad illam ciuitatem pertinere, quod dictum est: Cum autem uideritis circumdari ab exercitu Hierusalem, tunc scitote, quia adpropinquauit desolatio eius? item quis non uideat ad aduentum domini nouissimum pertinere, quod dictum est: Cum uideritis haec fieri, scitote, quoniam prope est regnum dei? illud autem, quod dictum est: Vae praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus. orate autem, ut non fiat fuga uestra hieme uel sabbato; erit enim tunc tribulatio magna, qualis non fuit ab initio mundi neque fiet, sic est positum secundum Matthaeum et secundum Marcum, ut incertum sit, utrum de excidio illius ciuitatis an de saeculi fine intellegi debeat. sic enim hoc ipsum legitur apud Marcum: Vae autem praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus. orate, ut hieme non fiant; erunt enim dies illi tribulationis tales. quales non fuerunt ab initio creaturae, quam condidit deus, usque nunc neque fient. et nisi breuiasset dominus dies illos, non fuisset salua omnis caro; sed propter electos, quos elegit, breuiauit dies. non dissimiliter et Matthaeus. hoc autem Lucas ita posuit, ut appareat ad illius ciuitatis excidium pertinere; nam sic apud eum legitur: Vae autem praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus; erit enim pressura magna super terram et ira populo huic et cadent in ore gladii et captiui ducentur in omnes gentes et Hierusalem calcabitur a gentibus, donec impleantur tempora nationum.

### English translation (Claude)

For who does not see that what was said belongs to that city: “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by an army, then know that its desolation has drawn near”? Again, who does not see that what was said belongs to the Lord's last coming: “When you see these things taking place, know that the kingdom of God is near”? But the saying, “Woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days. But pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a sabbath; for then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world, nor ever will be,” is so placed in Matthew and in Mark that it is uncertain whether it should be understood of the destruction of that city or of the end of the age. For this same passage reads thus in Mark: “But woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days. Pray that these things may not happen in winter; for those days will be days of such tribulation as has not been from the beginning of the creation that God created until now, nor ever will be. And unless the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect, whom he chose, he shortened the days.” Matthew is not unlike. But Luke put this in such a way that it is plain that it belongs to the destruction of that city; for in him it reads thus: “But woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days; for there will be great distress on the earth and wrath upon this people, and they will fall by the edge of the sword and be led captive among all nations, and Jerusalem will be trampled by the Gentiles until the times of the nations are fulfilled.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:20: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:31: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:19–21: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 13:17–20: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:23–24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 21:20, 31; Matt 24:19–21; Mark 13:17–20; Luke 21:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.27 (CSEL 57:267–268; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-27).

## Letter 199.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-28
- Source: CSEL 57:268–269
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine compares the three Gospel accounts to show that Luke places the abomination of desolation at the Roman siege of Jerusalem.

### Latin text

Unde autem ad hoc uentum est, Matthaeus ita scribit: Cum ergo uideritis abominationem desolationis, quae dicta est a Danihele propheta, stantem in loco sancto, qui legit, intellegat. tunc, qui in Iudaea sunt, fugiant in montes et, qui in tecto. non descendat tollere aliquid de domo sua et, qui in agro, non reuertatur tollere tunicam suam. uae autem praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus et cetera; Marcus uero ita: Cum autem uideritis abominationem desolationis stantem. ubi non debet, qui legit, intellegat. tunc, qui in Iudaea sunt, fugiant in montes et, qui super tectum, ne descendat in domum nec introeat, ut tollat quid de domo sua, et, qui in agro erit, non reuertatur retro tollere uestimentum suum. uae autem praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus et reliqua. Lucas uero, ut ostenderetur tunc factam fuisse abominationem desolationis, quae a Danihele praedicta est, quando expugnata est Hierusalem, haec eodem loco domini uerba commemorat: Cum autem uideritis circum dari ab exercitu Hierusalem, tunc scitote, quia adpropinquauit desolatio eius. apparet itaque tunc ibi positam desolationis abominationem, de qua duo illi euangelistae locuti sunt. denique etiam iste similiter sequitur: Tunc, qui in Iudaea sunt, fugiant in montes. et pro eo, quod dixerunt illi: Et qui super tectum. ne descendat in domum nec introeat, ut tollat quid de domo, iste dixit: Et qui in medio eius, discedant, ut ostenderetur illis uerbis apud alios euangelistas positis festinationem fugae fuisse praeceptam. et pro eo, quod illi posuerunt: Et qui in agro erit, non reuertatur retro tollere uestimentum suum, apertius iste ait: Et qui in regionibus, non intrent in eam, quia dies ultionis hi sunt, ut impleantur omnia, quae scripta sunt. deinde similiter etiam iste sequitur. ut prorsus manifestum sit de hac ipsa re omnium trium esse hunc euangelii locum: Vae autem praegnantibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus et cetera ad hoc pertinentia, quae iam commemoraui superius.

### English translation (Claude)

Matthew writes as follows about what led up to this: “So when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; and let him who is on the housetop not go down to take anything out of his house, and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his tunic. But woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days,” and so on. Mark, however, writes thus: “But when you see the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; and let him who is on the housetop not go down into the house, nor enter to take anything out of his house; and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his garment. But woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days,” and the rest. But Luke, to show that the abomination of desolation foretold by Daniel took place when Jerusalem was stormed, records these words of the Lord at the same point: “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by an army, then know that its desolation has drawn near.” So it is plain that the abomination of desolation of which those two evangelists spoke was set up there then. Then he too continues in a similar way: “Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.” And in place of what they said, “And let him who is on the housetop not go down into the house nor enter to take anything out of the house,” he said, “And let those who are inside it depart,” to show that the words set down by the other evangelists commanded haste in flight. And in place of what they set down, “And let him who is in the field not turn back to take his garment,” he says more plainly: “And let those who are in the country not enter it, for these are days of vengeance, so that all that is written may be fulfilled.” Then he too continues in a similar way, so that it is entirely plain that this passage of the gospel in all three concerns this very matter: “But woe to those who are pregnant and those who are nursing in those days,” and the rest belonging to it, which I have already mentioned above.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:15–19: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 13:14–17: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 21:20–23: quotation, high confidence
- Dan 9:27: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:15–19; Mark 13:14–17; Luke 21:20–23; Dan 9:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.28 (CSEL 57:268–269; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-28).

## Letter 199.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-29
- Source: CSEL 57:269–270
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the shortening of days for the elect refers to the siege of Jerusalem, where God's chosen among the Jews were spared unbearable suffering.

### Latin text

Lucas ergo patefecit, quod esse posset incertum, non ad saeculi finem sed ad expugnationem Hierusalem pertinere id. quod dictum est de abominatione desolationis et quod dictum est de dierum breuiatione propter electos, quia, etsi ea ipse non dixit, dixit tamen apertius cetera de hoc ipso, quo et ista pertinere monstrauit. non enim debemus ambigere, quando euersa est Hierusalem, fuisse in illo populo electos dei, qui ex circumcisione crediderant siue fuerant credituri, electi ante constitutionem mundi, propter quos breuiarentur dies illi, ut tolerabilia mala fierent. nam quidam conuenientius intellexisse mihi uidentur mala ipsa significata nomine dierum, sicut dicti sunt dies mali in aliis diuinae scripturae locis; neque enim dies ipsi mali sunt sed ea, quae fiunt in eis. ipsa ergo dicta sunt breuiari, ut deo donante tolerantiam minus sentirentur ac sic, quae magna essent, breuia fierent.

### English translation (Claude)

Luke, then, made clear what could have been uncertain: that what was said about the abomination of desolation, and what was said about the shortening of the days for the sake of the elect, refers not to the end of the age but to the storming of Jerusalem; because, even though he did not say these things himself, he said other things more plainly about this very event, and by them showed that these too belong to it. For we must not doubt that, when Jerusalem was overthrown, there were among that people God's elect, who from the circumcision had believed or were going to believe, chosen before the foundation of the world, for whose sake those days were to be shortened, so that the evils might become bearable. For some seem to me to have understood more fittingly that the evils themselves are signified by the word “days,” just as evil days are spoken of in other places of divine Scripture; for the days themselves are not evil, but the things that happen in them. So it is these that were said to be shortened, so that, by God's gift of endurance, they might be felt less, and thus what was great might become brief.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:22: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 1:4: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:22; Mark 13:20; Eph 1:4; Eph 5:16 (“evil days”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.29 (CSEL 57:269–270; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-29).

## Letter 199.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-30
- Source: CSEL 57:270–271
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine holds that Luke shows the shortened days and the abomination belong to Jerusalem's fall, citing Josephus on the unparalleled sufferings of that siege.

### Latin text

Sed siue isto modo intellegenda sit dierum illa breuiatio siue quod ad paucitatem redigerentur siue quod cursu solis celeriore breuiarentur — non enim desunt, qui et hoc existiment, ita scilicet dictos breuiores dies futuros, sicut fuit longior dies orante Iesu Naue —, tamen Lucas euangelista et hanc dierum breuiationem et abominationem desolationis, quae duo ipse non dixit, sed Matthaeus Marcusque dixerunt, ad euersionem Hierusalem docuit pertinere alia cum eis dicens apertius de hac eadem re, quae illi posuerunt obscurius. nam Iosephus, qui Iudaicam scripsit historiam, talia mala dicit illi populo tunc accidisse, ut uix credibilia uideantur. unde non inmerito dictum est talem tribulationem nec fuisse a creaturae initio nec futuram. sed etsi tempore Antichristi talis aut maior forsitan erit, intellegendum est de illo populo dictum. quod ei talis amplius futura non erit; si enim Antichristum illi primitus et praecipue recepturi sunt, facturus est tunc idem populus tribulationem potius quam passurus.

### English translation (Claude)

But whether that shortening of the days is to be understood in this way, or in that they would be reduced in number, or that they would be shortened by a swifter course of the sun (for there are some who think this too: that the days were said to be going to be shorter in the same way that the day was longer when Joshua son of Nun prayed), still the evangelist Luke taught that both this shortening of the days and the abomination of desolation, two things that he himself did not mention but Matthew and Mark did, belong to the overthrow of Jerusalem, by saying more plainly, along with them, other things about this same event which they set down more obscurely. For Josephus, who wrote the history of the Jews, says that such evils befell that people then that they seem scarcely credible. Hence it was not without reason said that such tribulation had not been from the beginning of creation, nor would be. But even if in the time of the Antichrist there will perhaps be such tribulation or greater, it must be understood as said of that people, that such tribulation will not again befall it; for if they are to be the first and foremost to receive the Antichrist, that people will then inflict tribulation rather than suffer it.

### Scripture references

- Josh 10:12–14: allusion, high confidence
- Mark 13:19: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Josephus, J.W. 5–6 (Josephus (works)): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Josh 10:12–14; Mark 13:19. Josephus, Jewish War (books 5–6), on the siege of Jerusalem. The statement that the Jews will be the first to receive the Antichrist is a common patristic view, translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.30 (CSEL 57:270–271; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-30).

## Letter 199.31

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-31
- Source: CSEL 57:271
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine agrees with Hesychius that the abomination was not fulfilled before Christ's passion, but argues it was fulfilled at the fall of Jerusalem rather than at the end of the age.

### Latin text

Non est ergo, cur putemus hebdomadas prophetae Danihelis uel propter dierum breuiationem fuisse turbatas uel illo iam tempore non fuisse completas, sed in fine saeculi esse complendas: non enim ante passionem domini impletae sunt. quod qui putant, rectissime tua sententia refelluntur, quia dixisti: Haec ergo abominatio si iam completa fuerat, quo modo dominus monet et dicit: Cum uideritis abominationem desolationis, quod dictum est per Danihelem prophetam, stantem in loco sancto, qui legit, intellegat? his uerbis beatitudinis tuae illi merito corrigendi sunt. qui dicunt eam, cum haec dominus loqueretur, uel ante passionem resurrectionemque eius fuisse completam. qui autem dicunt. sicut apertissime etiam Lucas euangelista testatur. tunc fuisse factam, quando euersa est Hierusalem, quid eis respondeatur, uidere debent, qui in fine saeculi uel circa finem existimant haec futura; quamquam ipsa desolationis abominatio propter obscuritatem dicti non uno modo ab hominibus potuerit intellegi.

### English translation (Claude)

There is no reason, then, for us to think that the weeks of the prophet Daniel were either disturbed by the shortening of the days, or not yet completed at that time but to be completed at the end of the age. They were not, indeed, fulfilled before the Lord's passion; those who think so are most rightly refuted by your judgment, for you said: “If, then, this abomination had already been fulfilled, how does the Lord warn us and say, ‘When you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand)’?” By these words of Your Blessedness those are rightly corrected who say that it was fulfilled when the Lord was saying these things, or before his passion and resurrection. But those who say that it took place when Jerusalem was overthrown, as the evangelist Luke too most plainly testifies, must be given an answer by those who think these things will happen at or near the end of the age; although the abomination of desolation itself, because of the obscurity of the saying, could be understood by people in more than one way.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Letter 198.7 (Matt 24:15).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.31 (CSEL 57:271; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-31).

## Letter 199.32

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-32
- Source: CSEL 57:271–272
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the command not to go back for one's goods spiritually, as a warning against falling back from spiritual progress in any tribulation.

### Latin text

Et quod dictum est: Qui est in tecto, non descendat tollere aliquid de domo sua et, qui in agro, non reuertatur tollere tunicam suam, potest congruentius intellegi spiritaliter, quod in tribulationibus omnibus est cauendum, ne quisque deuictus ad carnalem uitam de spiritali sublimitate descendat aut, qui profecerat in anteriora se extendens. deficiendo in posteriora respiciat. quod si in omni tribulatione. quanto magis in illa cauendum praecipi debuit. quae talis futura praedicta est illi ciuitati, qualis non fuit ab initio neque fiet, et si in ista, quanto magis in illa, quae nouissima futura est orbi terrae, id est ecclesiae toto orbe diffusae! nam et ipse Lucas non quidem, quando a discipulis suis de aduentu suo dominus interrogatus est, ubi hoc Matthaeus commemorauit et Marcus, sed alio loco, ubi Pharisaei quaesierunt ab illo, quando ueniet regnum dei, tale aliquid eum dixisse narrauit: In illa, inquit, hora, qui fuerit in tecto et uasa eius in domo, ne descendat tollere illa et. qui in agro, similiter non redeat retro.

### English translation (Claude)

And what was said, “Let him who is on the housetop not go down to take anything out of his house, and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his tunic,” can more fittingly be understood spiritually, as something to be guarded against in all tribulations: that no one, overcome, should come down from spiritual height to a carnal life, or that one who had made progress, stretching forward to what lies ahead, should fall away and look back to what lies behind. If this must be guarded against in every tribulation, how much more ought it to have been commanded for that tribulation which was foretold to that city as such as had not been from the beginning nor would be; and if in that one, how much more in the one that will be the last for the whole world, that is, for the Church spread through the whole world! For Luke himself too relates that the Lord said something of this kind, not, indeed, when he was asked by his disciples about his coming, where Matthew and Mark recorded it, but in another place, where the Pharisees asked him when the kingdom of God would come: “In that hour,” he says, “let him who is on the housetop, with his goods in the house, not go down to take them; and likewise let him who is in the field not turn back.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:17–18: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 17:20: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 17:31: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:17–18; Phil 3:13; Luke 17:20, 31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.32 (CSEL 57:271–272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-32).

## Letter 199.33

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-33
- Source: CSEL 57:272–273
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if Daniel's weeks were fulfilled in Christ, this explains why the apostles were told it was not theirs to know the time of the end.

### Latin text

Sed nunc propter computationem temporum de Danihelis hebdomadibus agitur, quae si circa tempora primi aduentus domini completae non sunt atque in fine complendae sunt, hoc apostolos ignorasse uel scisse quidem sed docere prohibitos fuisse quis credat? quamquam si hoc ita est, utiliter nesciunt gentes, quod dominus docere prohibuit eos, quos gentium uoluit esse doctores. si autem iam completae sunt. quia iam est unctus sanctus sanctorum, iam occisus est Christus, ut non esset ciuitatis eius, iam de templo illo sublatum est sacrificium, sublata unctio, merito apostolis de fine quaerentibus responsum est: Non est uestrum scire tempora, quae pater posuit in sua potestate, quoniam tempora, quae per Danihelis prophetiam scire poterant, non ad finem saeculi, de quo quaesierant, pertinebant.

### English translation (Claude)

But we are now dealing with the weeks of Daniel for the sake of computing the times. If they were not completed around the time of the Lord's first coming and are to be completed at the end, who would believe that the apostles did not know this, or knew it indeed but were forbidden to teach it? And yet, if this is so, it is profitable for the nations not to know what the Lord forbade those to teach whom he wished to be the teachers of the nations. But if they have already been completed, because the Holy of Holies has already been anointed, Christ has already been slain so that the city should not be his, the sacrifice has already been taken away from that temple and the anointing taken away, then rightly the apostles, when they asked about the end, were answered: “It is not yours to know the times which the Father has put in his own power,” since the times that they could know through Daniel's prophecy did not relate to the end of the age, about which they had asked.

### Scripture references

- Dan 9:24: allusion, high confidence
- Dan 9:26–27: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Dan 9:24, 26–27; Acts 1:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.33 (CSEL 57:272–273; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-33).

## Letter 199.34

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-34
- Source: CSEL 57:273–274
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the heavenly signs of his day are no greater than past ones, and that the darkening of the sun at the crucifixion was uniquely miraculous because it occurred at full moon.

### Latin text

Signa uero de caelo et terra numquid maiora nos uidimus. quam qui fuerunt ante nos? nonne, si gentium legatur historia, tanta mira reperiuntur extitisse de caelo terraque, ut aliqua etiam non credantur? sed, ut multa omittam, quae persequi longum est, duos soles quando nos uidimus, quos uisos litteris mandauerunt, qui tunc fuerunt, antequam dominus uenisset in carne? quando nos uidimus solem sic obscuratum, quem ad modum obscuratus est, cum mundi lumen penderet in ligno? nisi forte defectus solis et lunae, quos consuerunt computatores siderum adnotare atque praedicere, inter caelestia prodigia numerabimus, quia lunam saepius in sua plenitudine, solem uero rarius sed tamen uidimus in fine lunae secundum eorum computum defecisse. non erat talis solis ille defectus. quando crucifixus est Christus, et ideo uere mirabilis erat et prodigiosus. pascha quippe fuerat Iudaeorum, quod nonnisi in lunae plenitudine celebratur; secundum astrologorum autem numeros certum est solem, quando luna plena est, non posse deficere, sed quando finis est lunae non quidem semper sed aliter numquam, cum secundum illos numeros deficit. quid ergo tale umquam quisquam meminit apparuisse de caelo, ex quo dominus illa praedixit, quale apparuit, quando passus est quare si apparebunt etiam talia, si non spiritaliter potius intellegenda sunt, tunc apparebunt, quando finis sic adpropinquabit, ut debeant apparere.

### English translation (Claude)

As for signs from sky and earth, have we seen greater ones than those who were before us? If the history of the nations is read, are not such great wonders found to have appeared from sky and earth that some of them are not even believed? But, to pass over many that would take long to recount, when have we seen two suns, which those who lived before the Lord came in the flesh recorded in writing as having been seen? When have we seen the sun so darkened as it was darkened when the light of the world hung on the wood? Unless perhaps we shall count among heavenly portents the eclipses of the sun and moon that astronomers are accustomed to record and predict; for we have seen the moon fail quite often at its full, and the sun more rarely, but still we have seen it fail at the end of the moon, in accordance with their calculation. That eclipse of the sun when Christ was crucified was not of that kind, and therefore it was truly marvelous and portentous. For it was the Passover of the Jews, which is celebrated only at the full moon; and according to the reckonings of the astrologers it is certain that the sun cannot be eclipsed when the moon is full, but only at the end of the moon, not always indeed, but never otherwise, when according to those reckonings it is eclipsed. What, then, has anyone ever remembered appearing from the sky, since the Lord foretold these things, like what appeared when he suffered? Therefore, if such things too are to appear (unless they are rather to be understood spiritually), they will appear when the end draws so near that they must appear.

### Scripture references

- Luke 23:44–45: allusion, high confidence
- John 8:12: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 27:45; Luke 23:44–45; John 8:12. Two suns: reported by Roman historians (e.g. Livy) as a portent; Augustine names no source.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.34 (CSEL 57:273–274; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-34).

## Letter 199.35

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-35
- Source: CSEL 57:274–275
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that wars have always afflicted the world, as under Gallienus, and that Christ's prophecy may refer to the struggle of Christ's and the devil's kingdoms.

### Latin text

Bellis autem per diuersa interualla temporum et locorum quando non terra contrita est? nam, ut nimis antiqua praeteream, sub imperatore Gallieno, cum Romanas prouincias barbaries usque quaque peruaderet, quam multos fratres nostros. qui tunc erant in carne, putamus propinquum finem credere potuisse, quoniam longe post ascensionem domini factum est! ac per hoc etiam ista qualia futura sint, cum fuerit omnino finis proximus, ignoramus, si tamen haec non ita praedicta sunt, ut in ecclesia potius intellegi debeant. duae quippe gentes sunt et duo regna, unum scilicet Christi alterum diaboli, de quibus dici potuit: Exsurget gens super gentem et regnum super regnum, quod non desinit fieri, ex quo dictum est: Agite paenitentiam: adpropinquauit enim regnum caelorum. quod uide quando dictum est et ex illo quot anni transierunt et tamen uerissime dictum est. nouissimis enim diebus dominus per uirginem uenit nec diceretur ista hora nouissima nisi regno propinquante caelorum, per quam totam horam fiunt, quae dominus propinquante suo regno futura praedixit; sed haec hora quanto spatio protendatur, si apostolis dictum est: Non est uestrum scire quanto magis quilibet homo, qualis ego sum, modum suum debet agnoscere, ne plus sapiat, quam oportet sapere!

### English translation (Claude)

But when has the earth not been crushed by wars at various intervals of time and place? For, to pass over things too ancient, under the emperor Gallienus, when barbarians were overrunning the Roman provinces everywhere, how many of our brothers who were then in the flesh do we suppose could have believed the end was near, since it happened long after the Lord's ascension! And so we do not know what these things will be like when the end is altogether near, if indeed they were not foretold in such a way that they should rather be understood in the Church. For there are two peoples and two kingdoms, namely one of Christ and the other of the devil, of which it could be said, “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom”; and this has not ceased to happen since it was said, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has drawn near.” See when this was said, and how many years have passed since then, and yet it was said most truly. For in the last days the Lord came through the Virgin, and this would not be called the last hour unless the kingdom of heaven were drawing near; and throughout that whole hour the things happen that the Lord foretold would happen as his kingdom drew near. But how great a span this hour extends over, if it was said to the apostles, “It is not yours to know,” how much more ought any man such as I am to recognize his own measure, so as not to think more highly than he ought to think!

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 4:17: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 1:2: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 1:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gallienus reigned 253–268, when Goths and other peoples invaded the empire. Matt 24:7; Matt 4:17; Heb 1:2; Acts 1:7; Rom 12:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.35 (CSEL 57:274–275; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-35).

## Letter 199.36

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-36
- Source: CSEL 57:275
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks how present calamities can be sure signs of the end when Paul says the end will come while people say "peace and security."

### Latin text

Sed confiteri nos, inquis, poena nostra compellit adesse iam finem, dum impletur, quod praenuntiatum est: Arescentibus hominibus prae timore et expectatione, quae superueniunt uniuerso orbi. nullam, inquis, patriam, nullum locum nostris temporibus non affligi aut tribulari certum est, sicut dictum est: Prae timore et expectatione, quae superueniunt uniuerso orbi. si ergo ista mala. quae nunc patitur genus humanum, certa sunt indicia iam dominum esse uenturum, quid est, quod ait apostolus: Cum dixerint: Pax et securitas? cum enim dixisset euangelium: Arescentibus hominibus prae timore et expectatione, continuo subiunxit: Nam uirtutes caelorum mouebuntur. et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nube cum potestate magna et maiestate.

### English translation (Claude)

“But our punishment,” you say, “compels us to confess that the end is already here, while what was foretold is being fulfilled: ‘Men withering from fear and expectation of what is coming upon the whole world.’ It is certain,” you say, “that no country and no place in our times is not afflicted or troubled, as it was said: ‘From fear and expectation of what is coming upon the whole world.’” If, then, these evils that the human race now suffers are sure signs that the Lord is about to come, what does the apostle mean when he says, “When they say, ‘Peace and security’”? For when the gospel had said, “Men withering from fear and expectation,” it at once added: “For the powers of the heavens will be shaken, and then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:26–27: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine quotes Letter 198.5 (Luke 21:26); 1 Thess 5:3; Luke 21:26–27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.36 (CSEL 57:275; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-36).

## Letter 199.37

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-37
- Source: CSEL 57:275–276
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine suggests that the foretold tribulation will fall on the Church alone while its persecutors feel secure, whereas present evils afflict good and wicked alike amid continuing revelry.

### Latin text

Videamus itaque, ne forte melius intellegatur non ea modo impleri, quae praedicta sunt illis uerbis, sed tunc potius esse uentura, quando sic erit tribulatio uniuerso orbi. ut ad ecclesiam pertineat, quae uniuerso orbe tribulabitur. non ad eos, qui tribulabunt eam. ipsi enim dicturi sunt: Pax et securitas, ut repentinus illis superueniat interitus et eos aduentus domini sicut fur in nocte comprehendat, quando e contrario gaudebunt et exultabunt, qui diligunt manifestationem domini. nunc autem ista mala, quae tamquam summa et extrema creduntur, utrique genti et utrique regno et Christi scilicet et diaboli uidemus esse communia; pariter quippe his et boni affliguntur et mali nec est, qui dicat: Pax et securitas. ubicumque contingunt uel metuitur, ne contingant. inter quae tamen mala adhuc usque quaque frequentantur luxuriosa conuiuia, feruet ebriositas, auaritia grassatur, perstrepunt lasciui cantus, organa, tibiae, lyrae, citharae, tesserae, multa et uaria genera sonorum atque ludorum. hocine est arescere prae timore an potius madescere prae libidine? sed haec filii tenebrarum abundantius habebunt et exercebunt, cum dixerint: Pax et securitas.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us see, then, whether it is not perhaps better understood that the things foretold in those words are not being fulfilled now, but will rather come when there is such tribulation for the whole world that it concerns the Church, which will be afflicted throughout the whole world, not those who will afflict it. For they are the ones who will say, “Peace and security,” so that sudden destruction may come upon them and the Lord's coming may overtake them like a thief in the night, when, on the contrary, those who love the Lord's appearing will rejoice and exult. But now we see that these evils, which are believed to be the greatest and last, are common to both peoples and both kingdoms, that is, Christ's and the devil's; for the good and the wicked alike are afflicted by them, and there is no one who says “Peace and security” wherever they happen or are feared. Yet amid these evils self-indulgent banquets are still frequented everywhere, drunkenness boils over, greed runs riot, lewd songs resound, organs, flutes, lyres, harps, dice, many and various kinds of sounds and games. Is this withering from fear, or rather soaking in lust? But the sons of darkness will have and practice these things more abundantly when they say, “Peace and security.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:2–3: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 21:26: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:2–3; 2 Tim 4:8; Luke 21:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.37 (CSEL 57:275–276; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-37).

## Letter 199.38

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-38
- Source: CSEL 57:276–277
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine observes that even faithful Christians still marry, farm, trade, and govern, which will not be so when the foretold signs of the end come.

### Latin text

Quid ipsi filii lucis et filii diei, qui non sunt in. tenebris, ut eos tamquam fur dies ille comprehendat? nonne adhuc utuntur hoc mundo tamquam non utentes, quia, etsi ante multos annos apostolorum temporibus dictum est, pia tamen sollicitudine cogitant, quod dictum est: Tempus breue est? nonne a maxima parte eorum nouellatur, aedificatur, emitur, possidetur, geruntur adhuc honores, ducuntur uxores? de his loquor, qui expectantes dominum suum, quando ueniat a nuptiis, non se tamen abstinent a carnalibus nuptiis, sed oboedientissima caritate audiunt apostolum praecipientem, quem ad modum uiuere debeant uxores cum uiris, uiri cum uxoribus, filii cum parentibus, parentes cum filiis, serui cum dominis, domini cum seruis. nonne hi omnes in his omnibus utuntur hoc mundo? arant, nauigant, comparant, generant, militant, administrant. puto, quod non erunt sic, quando erunt, quae in euangelio praedicta sunt, signa in sole et luna et stellis et in terris pressura gentium prae confusione sonitus maris et fluctuum arescentibus hominibus prae timore et expectatione, quae superueniunt uniuerso orbi; nam uirtutes caelorum mouebuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

What of the sons of light themselves and sons of the day, who are not in darkness, so that that day should overtake them like a thief? Do they not still use this world as though not using it, because, although it was said many years ago in the times of the apostles, they still consider with devout concern what was said, “The time is short”? Is it not true that by most of them new vines are planted, building is done, things are bought and possessed, offices are still held, wives are married? I speak of those who, though waiting for their Lord, when he will return from the wedding, do not abstain from fleshly marriage, but listen with most obedient love to the apostle when he instructs how wives ought to live with husbands, husbands with wives, children with parents, parents with children, slaves with masters, masters with slaves. Do not all these use this world in all these things? They plough, sail, buy, beget, serve as soldiers, govern. I think it will not be so when the signs foretold in the gospel come to pass: signs in the sun and moon and stars, and on earth distress of nations in perplexity at the roaring of the sea and the waves, men withering from fear and expectation of what is coming upon the whole world; for the powers of the heavens will be shaken.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:4–5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:29: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:31: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 12:36: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 5:22–6:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Col 3:18–4:1: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 21:25–26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 5:4–5; 1 Cor 7:29, 31; Luke 12:36; Eph 5:22–6:9 and Col 3:18–4:1; Luke 21:25–26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.38 (CSEL 57:276–277; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-38).

## Letter 199.39

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-39
- Source: CSEL 57:277–279
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the darkened sun, moon, and falling stars as the Church obscured in the last persecution, when many who seemed to shine will fall away.

### Latin text

Haec quippe in ecclesia melius existimo intellegi, ne dominus Iesus propinquante secundo aduentu suo ea pro magno praedixisse uideatur, quae huic mundo et ante primum eius aduentum euenire consueuerant, et inrideamur ab eis, qui haec, quae uelut nouissima et omnium maxima horrescimus, plura in historia gentium et multo maiora legerunt. ecclesia est enim sol et luna et stellae, cui dictum est: Speciosa sicut luna, electa sicut sol. ab hac adoratur Ioseph noster in hoc mundo uelut in Aegypto ex humillimo sublimatus: nam illum Ioseph mater certe adorare non potuit, quae ante defuncta est, quam Iacob uenisset ad filium, ut illius somnii prophetici ueritas adimplenda Christo domino seruaretur. quando enim sol obscurabitur et luna non dabit lumen suum et stellae cadent de caelo et uirtutes caelorum commouebuntur, sicut ab aliis duobus euangelistis hic locus commemoratus est, ecclesia non apparebit; impiis tunc persecutoribus ultra modum saeuientibus et remoto timore tamquam adridente mundi felicitate dicentibus: Pax et securitas tunc stellae cadent de caelo et uirtutes caelorum commouebuntur, quoniam multi, qui gratia fulgere uidebantur, persequentibus cedent et cadent et quidem fideles fortissimi turbabuntur. ideo autem secundum Matthaeum et Marcum post tribulationem dierum illorum dicitur hoc futurum, non quia transacta tota illa persecutione accident ista, sed quia praecedet tribulatio, ut sequatur quorundam defectio, et, quia per omnes dies illos ita fiet, propterea post tribulationem dierum illorum sed tamen in eisdem diebus fiet.

### English translation (Claude)

For I think these things are better understood of the Church, lest the Lord Jesus should seem, as his second coming drew near, to have foretold as something great what used to happen to this world even before his first coming, and lest we be mocked by those who have read in the history of the nations of many and far greater things than these which we shudder at as the last and greatest of all. For the Church is the sun and moon and stars, to whom it was said, “Beautiful as the moon, chosen as the sun.” By her our Joseph is worshiped in this world, as in Egypt, raised from the lowest place to the highest; for his mother certainly could not worship that Joseph, since she died before Jacob came to his son, so that the truth of that prophetic dream might be kept to be fulfilled in Christ the Lord. For when the sun is darkened and the moon does not give its light and the stars fall from heaven and the powers of the heavens are shaken, as this passage is recorded by the other two evangelists, the Church will not be seen. When the ungodly persecutors then rage beyond measure and, with fear removed, as though the world's prosperity smiled on them, say, “Peace and security,” then the stars will fall from heaven and the powers of the heavens will be shaken, because many who seemed to shine with grace will yield to the persecutors and fall, and even the strongest believers will be troubled. And it is said according to Matthew and Mark that this will happen after the tribulation of those days, not because these things will occur when that whole persecution is over, but because the tribulation will come first, so that the falling away of some will follow; and because this will happen throughout all those days, therefore it will happen after the tribulation of those days, but still within those same days.

### Scripture references

- Song 6:10: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 37:9–10: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 35:19: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 24:29: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 13:24–25: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Song 6:10; Gen 37:9–10 and 35:19 (Rachel died before Jacob went to Egypt); Matt 24:29; Mark 13:24–25; 1 Thess 5:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.39 (CSEL 57:277–279; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-18/#p-199-39).

## Letter 199.40

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-40
- Source: CSEL 57:279
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the "distress of nations" refers to the wicked who will oppress the Church, present among all peoples alongside the oppressed faithful.

### Latin text

Quod ergo dictum est secundum Lucam: Et in terris pressura gentium, gentes uoluit intellegi non pertinentes ad semen Abrahae, in quo benedicentur omnes gentes, sed gentes, quae ad sinistram stabunt, quando congregabuntur ante iudicem uiuorum et mortuorum omnes gentes. utraque pars enim erit in omnibus gentibus, una, quae premat. altera, quae prematur, una, quae dicat: Pax et securitas, altera, in qua sol obscuretur et non det luna lumen suum et de qua cadant stellae et in qua uirtutes caelorum moueantur.

### English translation (Claude)

So when it was said according to Luke, “And on earth distress of nations,” he meant to be understood not the nations belonging to the seed of Abraham, in whom all nations will be blessed, but the nations that will stand on the left when all nations are gathered before the judge of the living and the dead. For both parts will be in all nations, one that oppresses and the other that is oppressed; one that says, “Peace and security,” the other in which the sun is darkened and the moon does not give its light, from which the stars fall, and in which the powers of the heavens are shaken.

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:25: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 22:18: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:32–33: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:3: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:29: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 21:25; Gen 22:18; Matt 25:32–33; 1 Thess 5:3; Matt 24:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.40 (CSEL 57:279; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-40).

## Letter 199.41

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-41
- Source: CSEL 57:279–280
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the Son of Man's coming in a cloud can mean either his coming in the Church or his bodily return as he ascended.

### Latin text

Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nube cum potestate magna et maiestate. quod uideo duobus modis accipi posse siue in ecclesia tamquam in nube uenientem, sicut etiam nunc uenire non cessat secundum id. quod ait: Amodo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis et uenientem in nubibus caeli. sed ideo tunc cum potestate magna et maiestate, quia maior potestas et maiestas illius apparebit sanctis, quibus magnam uirtutem dabit, ne tanta persecutione uincantur, siue in corpore suo, in quo sedet ad dexteram patris, in quo etiam mortuus est et resurrexit et ascendit in caelum, secundum quod scriptum est in actibus apostolorum: His dictis nubes suscepit eum et sublatus est ab eis. et quia illic etiam dictum est ab angelis: Sic ueniet, quo modo eum uidistis euntem in caelum, merito credendus est non solum in eodem corpore uerum etiam in nube uenturus. quoniam sic ueniet, sicut abiit et nubes eum suscepit abeuntem.

### English translation (Claude)

“And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty.” I see that this can be taken in two ways: either as coming in the Church as in a cloud, just as even now he does not cease to come, according to what he says, “From now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven” (but “then with great power and majesty,” because his greater power and majesty will appear to the saints, to whom he will give great strength so that they are not overcome by so great a persecution); or in his own body, in which he sits at the right hand of the Father, in which also he died and rose again and ascended into heaven, according to what is written in the Acts of the Apostles: “When he had said these things, a cloud received him and he was taken up from them.” And since the angels also said there, “He will come in the same way as you saw him going into heaven,” he is rightly to be believed to be coming not only in the same body but also in a cloud, since he will come as he went away, and a cloud received him as he went away.

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:27: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:64: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:9: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 21:27; Matt 26:64; Acts 1:9, 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.41 (CSEL 57:279–280; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-41).

## Letter 199.42

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-42
- Source: CSEL 57:280–281
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that in Luke the Son of Man's coming in a cloud is followed by the words "the kingdom of God is near," suggesting it is not the final coming itself.

### Latin text

Sed horum duorum quid hic potius eligendum sit, iudicare difficile est. promptior quidem sensus est, ut quisque. cum audierit uel legerit: Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nube cum potestate magna et maiestate, ipsum prorsus accipiat eius aduentum non per ecclesiam sed per se ipsum, quando uenturus est ad uiuos et mortuos iudicandos. sed quoniam scripturae scrutandae sunt nec earum superficie debemus esse contenti, quae ad exercitationem nostram ita modificatae sunt, ut altius se penetrari uelint, diligenter sunt inspicienda sequentia. cum enim dixisset: Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nube cum potestate magna et maiestate, adiunxit atque ait: His autem fieri incipientibus respicite et leuate capita uestra, quoniam adpropinquat redemptio uestra. et dixit illis similitudinem: Videte ficulneam et omnes arbores; cum producunt iam ex se fructum, scitis, quoniam prope est aestas; ita et uos cum uideritis haec fieri, scitote, quoniam prope est regnum dei. cum ergo dicit: Cum uideritis haec fieri, quae intellegere poterimus nisi ea, quae supra commemorata sunt? in his est autem etiam, quod ait; Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nube cum potestate magna et maiestate. proinde etiam hoc cum uisum fuerit, non iam erit regnum dei, sed prope erit.

### English translation (Claude)

But which of these two is to be preferred here is hard to judge. The more obvious sense, indeed, is that anyone who hears or reads, “And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty,” should take it as referring precisely to his coming not through the Church but in his own person, when he is to come to judge the living and the dead. But since the Scriptures are to be searched, and we ought not to be content with their surface, for they have been so shaped for our exercise that they want to be penetrated more deeply, what follows must be carefully examined. For when he had said, “And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty,” he added and said: “But when these things begin to take place, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.” And he told them a parable: “Look at the fig tree and all the trees; when they already put forth fruit, you know that summer is near; so also you, when you see these things taking place, know that the kingdom of God is near.” When, then, he says, “When you see these things taking place,” what can we understand but the things mentioned above? But among these is also what he says: “And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty.” Accordingly, even when this has been seen, the kingdom of God will not yet be here, but will be near.

### Scripture references

- Luke 21:27–31: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:39: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 21:27–31; John 5:39 (searching the Scriptures).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.42 (CSEL 57:280–281; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-42).

## Letter 199.43

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-43
- Source: CSEL 57:281–282
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that Mark keeps the same order, placing the coming in the clouds and the gathering of the elect before the nearness of the end.

### Latin text

Hunc ordinem uidemus et duos alios euangelistas tenere. apud Marcum enim cum dictum esset: Et uirtutes, quae sunt in caelis, mouebuntur, et tunc, inquit, uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nubibus cum uirtute multa et gloria. deinde subiungit, quod Lucas non dixit: Et tunc mittet angelos suos et congregabit electos suos a quattuor uentis a summo terrae usque ad summum caeli. tunc, quod ille de ficu et de aliis arboribus, iste de sola ficu ponens: A ficu autem discite, inquit, parabolam. cum iam ramus eius tener fuerit et nata fuerint folia, cognoscitis, quia in proximo sit aestas; sic et uos cum uideritis haec fieri, scitote, quod in proximo sit in ostiis. quid est cum uideritis haec fieri nisi ea, quae supra dixit? in quibus est etiam illud, quod ait: Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nubibus cum uirtute multa et gloria et tunc mittet angelos suos et congregabit electos suos. non itaque tunc erit finis, sed tunc erit in proximo.

### English translation (Claude)

We see that the other two evangelists also keep this order. For in Mark, when it had been said, “And the powers that are in the heavens will be shaken,” he says, “and then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.” Then he adds what Luke did not say: “And then he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds, from the end of the earth to the end of heaven.” Then, where Luke spoke of the fig tree and the other trees, Mark speaks of the fig tree alone: “From the fig tree learn the parable. When its branch has become tender and the leaves have come out, you know that summer is near; so also you, when you see these things taking place, know that it is near, at the doors.” What does “when you see these things taking place” mean, if not the things he said above? Among them is also what he says: “And then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory, and then he will send his angels and gather his elect.” So the end will not be then, but then it will be near.

### Scripture references

- Mark 13:25–29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Mark 13:25–29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.43 (CSEL 57:281–282; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-43).

## Letter 199.44

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-44
- Source: CSEL 57:282
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Matthew's "all these things" that the coming of the Son of Man in the clouds is itself a sign that the end is near.

### Latin text

An dicendum est non omnia, quae supra commemorata sunt, esse intellegenda, ubi ait: Cum uideritis haec fieri, sed aliqua eorum hoc uidelicet excepto, quod dictum est: Et tunc uidebunt filium hominis uenientem et cetera? ipse quippe finis erit, non tunc proximus erit. sed Matthaeus aperuit nullis exceptis esse accipiendum, quod positum est: Cum uideritis haec fieri; nam et apud ipsum cum dictum esset: Et uirtutes caelorum mouebuntur, et tunc apparebit, inquit, signum filii hominis in caelo et tunc plangent omnes tribus terrae et uidebunt filium hominis uenientem in nubibus caeli in uirtute multa et maiestate et mittet angelos suos cum tuba et uoce magna et congregabunt electos eius a quattuor uentis a summis caelorum usque ad terminos eorum. ab arbore autem fici discite parabolam. cum iam ramus eius tener fuerit et folia nata, scitis, quia prope est aestas; ita et uos cum uideritis haec omnia, scitote, quia prope est in ianuis.

### English translation (Claude)

Or should it be said that where he says, “When you see these things taking place,” not all the things mentioned above are to be understood, but some of them, namely with the exception of what was said, “And then they will see the Son of Man coming,” and so on, since that will be the end itself, and not the time when it is near? But Matthew made it clear that what is set down, “When you see these things taking place,” must be taken with no exceptions; for in him too, when it had been said, “And the powers of the heavens will be shaken,” he says, “and then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with great power and majesty; and he will send his angels with a trumpet and a loud voice, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from the heights of the heavens to their bounds. From the fig tree learn the parable. When its branch has become tender and the leaves have come out, you know that summer is near; so also you, when you see all these things, know that it is near, at the doors.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:29–33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:29–33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.44 (CSEL 57:282; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-44).

## Letter 199.45

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-45
- Source: CSEL 57:282–284
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine proposes that much of the Gospels' language about Christ's coming may refer to his continual coming in the Church, except for passages like Matthew 25 that clearly describe the final judgment.

### Latin text

Tunc ergo scimus prope esse, cum uiderimus non aliqua eorum sed haec omnia, in quibus et hoc est, quod uidebitur filius hominis ueniens et mittet angelos suos et de quattuor mundi partibus, id est de toto orbe terrarum congregat electos suos, quod tota hora nouissima facit ueniens in suis membris tamquam in nubibus uel in tota ipsa ecclesia, quod est corpus eius, tamquam in nube magna fructificante atque crescente in uniuerso mundo, ex quo coepit praedicare et dicere: Agite paenitentiam; adpropinquauit enim regnum caelorum, ita ut fortasse omnia, quae ab his tribus euangelistis dicta sunt de eius aduentu, diligentius inter se conlata atque discussa inueniantur ad hoc pertinere, quod cotidie uenit in corpore suo. quod est ecclesia, de quo aduentu suo dixit: Amodo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis et uenientem in nubibus caeli, exceptis his locis, ubi ab eo ille aduentus ultimus in se ipso, quando est uiuos iudicaturus et mortuos, ita promittitur, ut propinquare dicatur, et quod in ultimo sermonis secundum Matthaeum ipse omnino aduentus euidenter exprimitur, cuius superius quibusdam signis propinquitas intellegenda monstratur. ad hoc quippe apud Matthaeum sermo ipse concluditur: Cum autem uenerit filius hominis, inquit, in maiestate sua et omnes angeli cum eo, tunc sedebit super sedem maiestatis suae, tunc congregabuntur ante eum omnes gentes et cetera usque ad illud, ubi ait: Et ibunt hi in supplicium aeternum, iusti autem in uitam aeternam. hoc enim nullus ambigit de Christi aduentu nouissimo et de fine saeculi fuisse praedictum. nam et illas quinque et quinque uirgines non defuerunt qui non contemptibili disputatione docere uoluerint ad hunc eius aduentum, qui nunc fit per ecclesiam, pertinere. sed haec non sunt temere pollicenda, ne aliquid occurrat, quod ualide contradicat, praesertim quia in talibus diuinorum eloquiorum obscuritatibus. quibus nostras intellegentias deo placuit exercere, non solum alius alio mouetur acutius eorum, qui scripturas sanctas non inprobabiliter tractant, sed etiam quilibet unus illorum aliquando minus aliquando melius intellegit.

### English translation (Claude)

So we know that it is near when we see not some of these things but all of them, among which is this too, that the Son of Man will be seen coming, and will send his angels, and gathers his elect from the four parts of the world, that is, from the whole earth. This he does throughout the whole last hour, coming in his members as in clouds, or in the whole Church itself, which is his body, as in a great cloud bearing fruit and growing in the whole world, from the time when he began to preach and say, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has drawn near.” So perhaps everything said by these three evangelists about his coming, if more carefully compared and examined together, may be found to refer to his daily coming in his body, which is the Church, of which coming he said, “From now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven”; except for those places where that last coming in his own person, when he is to judge the living and the dead, is promised in such a way that it is said to be drawing near, and except that at the end of the discourse according to Matthew the coming itself is plainly described, whose nearness was shown above to be recognized by certain signs. For the discourse in Matthew concludes with this: “When the Son of Man comes in his majesty, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his majesty; then all nations will be gathered before him,” and so on, up to where he says, “And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” No one doubts that this was foretold of Christ's last coming and the end of the age. For there have not been lacking those who, by no contemptible argument, have sought to show that even the five and five virgins belong to this coming of his that now takes place through the Church. But these things should not be rashly promised, lest something should arise that strongly contradicts them, especially since in such obscurities of the divine words, by which it has pleased God to exercise our understanding, not only is one of those who handle the holy Scriptures not improbably moved more acutely than another, but even any one of them understands sometimes less well, sometimes better.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:31: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 4:17: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:64: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:31–32: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:46: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:1–13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:31; Col 1:6, 18; Matt 4:17; Matt 26:64; Matt 25:31–32, 46; Matt 25:1–13 (the ten virgins).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.45 (CSEL 57:282–284; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-45).

## Letter 199.46

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-46
- Source: CSEL 57:284–285
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the gospel has not yet reached the whole world, citing the many unevangelized peoples of the African interior.

### Latin text

Nescio tamen, utrum intueri aliquid certius in hac quaestione possemus, si ulla ratione seu facultate possemus, quam illud, quod in epistula priore iam posui, quando euangelio mundus uniuersus impleatur. quod enim putat uenerabilitas tua iam hoc per ipsos apostolos factum, non ita esse certis documentis probaui. sunt enim apud nos, hoc est in Africa barbarae innumerabiles gentes, in quibus nondum esse praedicatum euangelium ex his, qui ducuntur inde captiui et Romanorum seruitiis iam miscentur, cotidie nobis addiscere in promptu est. pauci tamen anni sunt, ex quo quidam eorum rarissimi atque paucissimi, qui pacati Romanis finibus adhaerent, ita ut non habeant reges suos, sed super eos praefecti a Romano constituantur imperio, et illi ipsi eorum praefecti Christiani esse coeperunt. interiores autem, qui sub nulla sunt potestate Romana, prorsus nec religione Christiana in suorum aliquibus detinentur neque ullo modo recte dici potest istos ad promissionem dei non pertinere.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet I do not know whether we could see anything more certain in this question, if we could by any method or means, than what I already set out in my previous letter: when the whole world will be filled with the gospel. For what Your Venerableness thinks, that this was already done by the apostles themselves, I have shown by sure evidence is not so. For there are among us, that is, in Africa, innumerable barbarian peoples among whom the gospel has not yet been preached, as we can readily learn every day from those who are brought from there as captives and are now mixed among the slaves of the Romans. Yet it is only a few years since some of them, very rare and very few, who adjoin the Roman frontiers at peace, so that they have no kings of their own but prefects are set over them by the Roman Empire, began to be Christians, and their prefects themselves too. But those further inland, who are under no Roman authority, are not held by the Christian religion at all in any of their people; and yet it cannot in any way rightly be said that they do not belong to God's promise.

### Translation notes

- The previous letter is Letter 197.4. Augustine's remark about captives sold as slaves is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.46 (CSEL 57:284–285; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-46).

## Letter 199.47

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-47
- Source: CSEL 57:285–286
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from God's promise to Abraham and from the Psalms that the Church must spread to every nation and island, including those beyond Roman rule.

### Latin text

Non enim Romanos sed omnes gentes dominus semini Abrahae media quoque iuratione promisit. ex qua promissione iam factum est, ut nonnullae gentes. quae non tenentur dicione Romana, reciperent euangelium et adiungerentur ecclesiae, quae fructificat et crescit in uniuerso mundo. adhuc enim habet, quo crescat. donec fiat, quod de Christo in Salomonis figura prophetatum est: Dominabitur a mari usque ad mare et a flumine usque ad terminos orbis terrae, a flumine scilicet, ubi baptizatus est, quia inde coepit euangelium praedicare, a mari autem usque ad mare totus est orbis cum omnibus, quoniam mari Oceano cingitur uniuersus. quo modo autem implebitur aliter illa prophetia: Omnes gentes, quotquot fecisti, uenient et adorabunt coram te, domine? non enim de locis suis migrando uenient sed in locis suis credendo. de credentibus quippe dominus dixit: Nemo potest uenire ad me, nisi datum fuerit ei a patre meo; propheta autem dicit: Et adorabunt eum unusquisque de loco suo, omnes insulae gentium. omnes insulae dixit, tamquam diceret etiam omnes insulae hinc ostendens, quam nulla relinquatur terrarum, ubi non sit ecclesia, quando nulla relinquitur insularum, quarum nonnullae etiam in Oceano sunt constitutae et quasdam earum euangelium iam suscepisse didicimus. atque ita et in insulis singulis quibusque impletur, quod dictum est: Dominabitur a mari usque ad mare, quo unaquaeque insula cingitur, sicut in uniuerso orbe terrarum, quae tamquam omnium quodam modo maxima est insula, quia et ipsam cingit Oceanus, ad cuius littora in occidentalibus partibus ecclesiam peruenisse iam nouimus et, quocumque litorum eius nondum peruenit, peruentura est utique fructificando atque crescendo.

### English translation (Claude)

For the Lord promised to the seed of Abraham, with an oath interposed, not the Romans but all nations. In accordance with this promise it has already happened that some nations not held under Roman rule have received the gospel and been joined to the Church, which bears fruit and grows in the whole world. For it still has room to grow, until what was prophesied of Christ under the figure of Solomon comes to pass: “He will rule from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth”: from the river, that is, where he was baptized, because from there he began to preach the gospel; and from sea to sea is the whole world with all that is in it, since the whole is girded by the sea of Ocean. How else will that prophecy be fulfilled: “All the nations you have made will come and worship before you, O Lord”? For they will come not by migrating from their places but by believing in their places. For of believers the Lord said, “No one can come to me unless it has been granted him by my Father”; and the prophet says, “And they will worship him, each from his own place, all the islands of the nations.” He said “all the islands,” as though to say “even all the islands,” showing thereby that no land will be left where the Church is not, since none of the islands is left, some of which are set even in the Ocean, and we have learned that some of them have already received the gospel. And so in each and every island too is fulfilled what was said, “He will rule from sea to sea,” by which each island is girded, as also in the whole earth, which is in a way the greatest island of all, because Ocean girds it too; and we already know that the Church has reached its shores in the western parts, and wherever on its shores it has not yet reached, it will certainly reach by bearing fruit and growing.

### Scripture references

- Gen 22:16–18: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 6:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Col 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 86:9 (85:9 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 6:65: quotation, high confidence
- Zeph 2:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 22:16–18 (cf. Heb 6:13–17); Col 1:6; Ps 72:8; Ps 86:9; John 6:65; Zeph 2:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.47 (CSEL 57:285–286; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-47).

## Letter 199.48

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-48
- Source: CSEL 57:286–287
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Church must exist in every nation, though not all in each will believe, so that both the elect and those who hate them are found among all peoples.

### Latin text

Si ergo, quia prophetia ueritatis mentiri non potest, necesse est, ut omnes gentes, quotquot fecit deus, adorent eum, quo modo adorabunt eum, nisi inuocent eum? quo modo autem inuocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? aut quo modo credent, quem non audierunt? quo modo autem audient sine praedicante? aut quo modo praedicabunt, nisi mittantur? mittit enim angelos suos et congregat electos suos a quattuor uentis, id est ab uniuerso orbe terrarum. in quibus ergo gentibus nondum est ecclesia, oportet ut sit, non ut omnes, qui ibi fuerint, credant; omnes enim gentes promissae sunt, non omnes homines omnium gentium; non enim omnium est fides. credit itaque omnis gens in omnibus, qui electi sunt ante constitutionem mundi, in ceteris non credit et credentes odit. quo modo enim et illud implebitur: Eritis odio omnibus gentibus propter nomen meum, nisi in omnibus gentibus sint, et qui oderint et quos oderint?

### English translation (Claude)

If, then, since the prophecy of truth cannot lie, it is necessary that all the nations, as many as God has made, should worship him, how will they worship him unless they call on him? And how will they call on him in whom they have not believed? Or how will they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher? Or how will they preach unless they are sent? For he sends his angels and gathers his elect from the four winds, that is, from the whole earth. So among the nations where the Church does not yet exist, it must exist; not that all who are there should believe, for all nations were promised, not all the people of all nations; for not all have faith. So every nation believes in all those who were chosen before the foundation of the world; in the rest it does not believe, and hates those who believe. For how else will this too be fulfilled, “You will be hated by all nations for my name's sake,” unless in all nations there are both those who hate and those whom they hate?

### Scripture references

- Ps 86:9 (85:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Rom 10:14–15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:31: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Thess 3:2: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 1:4: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 86:9; Rom 10:14–15; Matt 24:31; 2 Thess 3:2; Eph 1:4; Matt 24:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.48 (CSEL 57:286–287; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-48).

## Letter 199.49

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-49
- Source: CSEL 57:287–288
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ's commission to witness to the ends of the earth, like his promise to be with them always, was addressed to the apostles but applies to the whole Church.

### Latin text

Quo pacto igitur ab apostolis est praedicatio ista completa, quando adhuc usque sunt gentes, quod certissimum est nobis. in quibus modo coepit et in quibus nondum coepit impleri? non itaque sic dictum est apostolis: Eritis mihi testes in Hierusalem et in tota Iudaea et Samaria et usque ad extremum terrae, tamquam ipsi soli, quibus tunc loquebatur, tantum munus fuerint impleturi, sed sicut eis solis uidetur dixisse, quod dixit: Ecce ego uobiscum sum usque in consummationem saeculi, quod tamen eum uniuersae ecclesiae promisisse, quae aliis morientibus aliis nascentibus hic usque in saeculi consummationem futura est, quis non intellegat? sicut eis et illud ait. quod ad eos omnino non pertinet et tamen sic dictum est, tamquam ad solos etiam pertineret: Cum uideritis haec omnia. scitote, quia prope est in ianuis; ad quos enim hoc pertinet nisi ad eos, qui in carne tunc erunt, cum omnia complebuntur? quanto magis illud, quod ex magna parte per eos agendum fuit, quamuis et posteris eorum eadem actio seruaretur!

### English translation (Claude)

How, then, was this preaching completed by the apostles, when there are still nations, as is most certain to us, in which it has only just begun to be fulfilled, and in which it has not yet begun? So it was not said to the apostles, “You shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria and to the end of the earth,” as though they alone, to whom he was then speaking, would fulfil so great a task; but just as he seems to have said to them alone what he said, “Behold, I am with you until the consummation of the age,” and yet who does not understand that he promised it to the whole Church, which, as some die and others are born, will be here until the consummation of the age? So too he said this to them, which does not apply to them at all, and yet it was said as though it applied to them alone: “When you see all these things, know that it is near, at the doors”; for to whom does this apply, if not to those who will be in the flesh when all things are fulfilled? How much more does that apply which was to be done in great part through them, although the same work was reserved for their successors too!

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 28:20: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Acts 1:8; Matt 28:20; Matt 24:33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.49 (CSEL 57:287–288; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-49).

## Letter 199.50

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-50
- Source: CSEL 57:288–289
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Paul, like the prophets, used the past tense of things still to come, so Romans 10:18 does not mean the gospel had already reached the whole world.

### Latin text

Quod autem dixit apostolus: Numquid non audierunt? in omnem terram exiit sonus eorum et in fines orbis terrae uerba eorum, quamuis locutus sit praeteriti temporis uerbis, tamen, quod futurum fuerat, dixit, non quod iam factum atque completum, sicut ipse propheta, quo usus est teste, non ait in omnem terram exiturus, sed: Exiit. inquit, sonus eorum. quod utique nondum erat factum: quale est etiam illud: Foderunt manus meas et pedes, quod tam longe postea factum nouimus. sed ne istas propheticas tantum locutiones non et apostolicas fuisse credamus. nonne idem ipse apostolus ait: Quae est ecclesia dei uiui, columna et firmamentum ueritatis. et sine dubio magnum est pietatis sacramentum, quod manifestatum est in carne, iustificatum est in spiritu, apparuit angelis, praedicatum est in gentibus, creditum est in mundo, adsumptum est in gloria? nempe manifestum est hoc, quod in extremo posuit. etiam nunc nondum esse completum; quanto magis tunc, quando ista dicebat! ecclesia quippe tunc adsumetur in gloria, quando dicetur: Venite. benedicti patris mei. percipite regnum; et tamen, tamquam factum fuisset, dictum est, quod certo sciebatur futurum.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what the apostle said, “Have they not heard? Their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world,” although he spoke in past-tense words, he nevertheless said what was to be, not what had already been done and completed; just as the prophet himself, whom he used as a witness, does not say “will go out into all the earth,” but “Their sound has gone out,” which certainly had not yet happened. Of the same kind is this too: “They have pierced my hands and feet,” which we know happened so long afterward. But lest we believe that these expressions were only prophetic and not apostolic as well, does not the same apostle say, “Which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth; and without doubt great is the mystery of godliness, which was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, appeared to angels, was preached among the nations, believed in the world, taken up in glory”? Surely it is plain that what he put last is not yet completed even now; how much less then, when he was saying it! For the Church will be taken up in glory when it is said, “Come, blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom”; and yet what was known for certain to be going to happen was said as though it had happened.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 19:4 (18:5 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:16 (21:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 3:15–16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:34: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:18 (Ps 19:4); Ps 22:16; 1 Tim 3:15–16; Matt 25:34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.50 (CSEL 57:288–289; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-50).

## Letter 199.51

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-51
- Source: CSEL 57:289
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Paul's words in Colossians describe the gospel's ongoing growth, and since no one knows when it will fill the world, no one knows when the end will come.

### Latin text

Multo minus mirandum est, quod etiam uerbis praesentis temporis usus est in eo, quod illum identidem dixisse memorasti: Propter spem, quae reposita est uobis, quam ante audistis in uerbo ueritatis euangelii, quod aduenit in uos, sicut et in omni mundo est fructificans et crescens, quamuis euangelium nondum mundum tenebat uniuersum; sed fructificare illud in uniuerso mundo dixit et crescere, ut ita significaret, quousque fuisset fructificando et crescendo uenturum. si ergo latet. quando ecclesia fructificante atque crescente uniuersus omnino a mari usque ad mare orbis implebitur, procul dubio latet. quando finis. erit; ante quippe non erit.

### English translation (Claude)

Much less is it to be wondered at that he also used present-tense words in what you recalled him saying likewise: “Because of the hope that is laid up for you, of which you heard before in the word of the truth of the gospel, which has come to you, as it is also in the whole world bearing fruit and growing,” although the gospel did not yet hold the whole world; but he said that it was bearing fruit and growing in the whole world, to signify thereby how far it would come by bearing fruit and growing. If, then, it is hidden when the whole world from sea to sea will be entirely filled by the Church bearing fruit and growing, beyond doubt it is hidden when the end will be; for it will not be before then.

### Scripture references

- Col 1:5–6: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 72:8 (71:8 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 1:5–6; Ps 72:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.51 (CSEL 57:289; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-51).

## Letter 199.52

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-52
- Source: CSEL 57:289–290
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine introduces three good servants, one expecting the Lord soon, one later, and one admitting ignorance, to ask which best agrees with the gospel.

### Latin text

Ut autem tibi tamquam sancto homini dei et sincerissimo fratri aperiam, de hac quaestione quid sentiam, error quidem in utroque uitandus est. quantum ab homine uitari potest. siue citius siue tardius, quam futurum est, dominus uenturus esse credatur; sed mihi quisquam non uidetur errare, cum aliquid nescire se scit, sed cum se putat scire. quod nescit. remoueamus itaque de medio seruum illum malum, qui dicens in corde suo: Moram facit dominus meus uenire dominatur conseruis suis et ebriosis conuiuando miscetur; iste quippe procul dubio domini sui odit aduentum. quo seruo malo remoto constituamus ante oculos tres seruos bonos familiam dominicam diligenter sobrieque tractantes. aduentum domini sui sitienter desiderantes, uigilanter expectantes, fideliter amantes. si unus eorum citius, alter tardius dominum putat esse uenturum, tertius uero suam de hac re ignorantiam confitetur. quamquam omnes consonent euangelio, quia omnes diligunt manifestationem domini et eam desideranter et uigilanter expectant, uideamus tamen. quis amplius consonet.

### English translation (Claude)

But to open my mind to you on this question, as to a holy man of God and a most sincere brother: error is indeed to be avoided on both sides, as far as a man can avoid it, whether the Lord is believed to be coming sooner or later than he will come; but it seems to me that no one errs when he knows that he does not know something, but when he thinks he knows what he does not know. Let us therefore set aside that wicked servant who, saying in his heart, “My master is delaying his coming,” lords it over his fellow servants and mixes in feasting with drunkards; for he beyond doubt hates his master's coming. With that wicked servant set aside, let us put before our eyes three good servants, managing the Lord's household diligently and soberly, longing thirstily for their Lord's coming, awaiting it watchfully, loving it faithfully. If one of them thinks the Lord will come sooner, another later, while the third confesses his ignorance on this matter, although all agree with the gospel, because all love the Lord's appearing and await it with longing and watchfulness, let us still see which agrees with it more.

### Scripture references

- Matt 24:48–49: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 24:48–49; 2 Tim 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.52 (CSEL 57:289–290; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-52).

## Letter 199.53

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-53
- Source: CSEL 57:290–293
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that the servant who confesses ignorance of the time agrees best with the gospel, and warns of the danger to faith in predicting an early end.

### Latin text

Unus dicit: Vigilemus et oremus, quia citius uenturus est dominus; alter dicit: Vigilemus et oremus, quia breuis et incerta est ista uita, quamuis tardius uenturus sit dominus: tertius dicit: Vigilemus et oremus, quia et breuis atque incerta est ista uita et nescimus tempus. quando uenturus est dominus; euangelium dicit: Videte. uigilate et orate; nescitis enim. quando tempus sit. obsecro te, quid aliud dicere audimus hunc tertium, quam quod dicere audimus euangelium? omnes quidem prae desiderio regni dei hoc nolunt esse uerum. quod putat primus; sed hoc secundus negat; tertius uero non negat aliquid horum, sed ignorare se fatetur, quis uerum dicat illorum. proinde si hoc factum fuerit, quod praedixerat primus, gaudebunt cum illo secundus et tertius; omnes enim manifestationem domini diligunt; exultabunt itaque citius uenisse, quod diligunt. si autem factum non fuerit et apparere coeperit hoc potius esse uerum, quod dicebat secundus, metuendum est, ne inter ipsas moras perturbentur. qui crediderant. quod dixerat primus, et incipiant domini aduentum non tardum putare sed nullum. qui uides quantus sit interitus animarum. quod si tantae fidei fuerint. ut se ad secundi praedicta conuertant et dominum etiam tardantem fideliter et patienter expectent, abundabunt tamen opprobria et insultationes atque inrisiones inimicorum multos infirmos a Christiana fide auertentium dicendo tam fallaciter eis regnum esse promissum, quam fallaciter dicebatur cito esse uenturum. qui autem credunt, quod dicit secundus, tardius dominum esse uenturum, si falsum fuerit inuentum citius domino ueniente, nullo modo, qui ei crediderant, turbabuntur in fide, sed inopinato gaudio perfruentur. Quapropter qui dicit dominum citius esse uenturum, optabilius loquitur, sed periculose fallitur. utinam ergo sit uerum, quia erit molestum, si non erit uerum! qui autem dicit dominum tardius esse uenturum et tamen credit, sperat, amat eius aduentum, profecto de tarditate eius etiam si fallitur. feliciter fallitur; habebit enim maiorem patientiam, si hoc ita erit, maiorem laetitiam. si non erit. ac per hoc ab eis. qui diligunt manifestationem domini. ille auditur suauius, iste creditur tutius. qui autem, quid horum sit uerum, ignorare se confitetur, illud optat, hoc tolerat, in nullo eorum errat. quia nihil eorum aut adfirmat aut negat. obsecro te, ut me talem non spernas, quia et ego te diligo id adfirmantem, quod uerum esse desidero, et tanto magis nolo fallaris, quanto magis amo, quod polliceris. et quanto magis uideo periculosum esse, si falleris. da ueniam, si onerosus fui sanctis sensibus tuis: quanto enim rarius prouenit. tanto me tecum saltem per litteras loqui diutius delectauit.

### English translation (Claude)

One says: “Let us watch and pray, because the Lord will come soon.” Another says: “Let us watch and pray, because this life is short and uncertain, even though the Lord will come later.” The third says: “Let us watch and pray, because this life is both short and uncertain, and we do not know the time when the Lord will come.” The gospel says: “Take heed, watch and pray; for you do not know when the time is.” I ask you, what else do we hear this third one saying than what we hear the gospel saying? All of them, indeed, out of longing for the kingdom of God, would wish what the first thinks to be true; but the second denies it, while the third denies neither, but confesses that he does not know which of them speaks the truth. Accordingly, if what the first had foretold comes to pass, the second and third will rejoice with him; for all love the Lord's appearing, and so they will exult that what they love has come sooner. But if it does not come to pass and what the second said begins rather to appear true, it is to be feared that during the very delay those who had believed what the first had said may be disturbed and may begin to think the Lord's coming not late but non-existent; and you see how great a ruin of souls that is. And if they are of such great faith that they turn to what the second foretold and await the Lord faithfully and patiently even though he delays, still there will be abundant reproaches, insults, and mockeries from enemies who turn many of the weak away from the Christian faith by saying that the kingdom was promised them as falsely as it was falsely said that he would come soon. But as for those who believe what the second says, that the Lord will come later, if it is found false by the Lord's coming sooner, those who had believed him will in no way be disturbed in faith, but will enjoy an unexpected joy. Therefore the one who says the Lord will come sooner speaks more desirably, but is dangerously mistaken. Would that it were true, for it will be troublesome if it is not true! But the one who says the Lord will come later, and yet believes, hopes for, and loves his coming, certainly, even if he is mistaken about the delay, is happily mistaken; for he will have greater patience if it is so, greater joy if it is not. And so, by those who love the Lord's appearing, the former is heard more pleasantly, the latter believed more safely. But the one who confesses that he does not know which of these is true hopes for the one, bears with the other, and errs in neither, because he neither affirms nor denies either of them. I beg you not to despise me for being such a man, for I too love you for affirming what I desire to be true; and the more I love what you promise, and the more I see how dangerous it would be if you were mistaken, the less I want you to be mistaken. Forgive me if I have been burdensome to your holy mind; for the more rarely it happens, the more it has delighted me to speak with you at length, at least by letter.

### Scripture references

- Mark 13:33: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Mark 13:33; 2 Tim 4:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 199.53 (CSEL 57:290–293; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-199-53).

## Letter 200.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-1
- Source: CSEL 57:293–294
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Count Valerius for three letters and for the presbyter Firmus's warm report of his Christian character.

### Latin text

Cum diu moleste haberem, quod aliquotiens scripserim et nulla tuae sublimitatis rescripta meruerim, repente epistulas tres tuae benignitatis accepi, unam non ad me solum datam per coepiscopum meum Vindemialem et non longe post per conpresbyterum Firmum duas. qui uir sanctus nobisque, ut ab illo scire potuisti, familiarissima caritate coniunctus multa nobiscum de tua excellentia conloquendo et ueraciter insinuando, qualem te Christi uisceribus nouerit. non solum eas, quas memoratus episcopus uel quas ipse adtulit, sed etiam illas, quas non accepisse nos querebamur, litteras uicit. et ideo de te narratio eius suauior nobis erat, quia ea dicebat. quae ipse non possis ne quidem me inquirente rescribere. ne tuarum laudum, quod sancta scriptura prohibet, fieres praedicator. quamquam et ego uerear haec ad te scribere, ne suspicionem adulantis incurram, domine inlustris et merito praestantissime atque in Christi dilectione carissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

While I had long been troubled that I had written several times and had not been favored with any reply from Your Highness, I suddenly received three letters from Your Kindness: one, not addressed to me alone, through my fellow bishop Vindemialis, and not long afterward two through our fellow presbyter Firmus. That holy man, joined to us, as you could learn from him, by a most intimate love, talked with us at length about Your Excellency and truthfully conveyed what kind of man he has known you to be in the heart of Christ; and so he surpassed not only the letters that the bishop I mentioned, or he himself, brought, but even those that we complained we had not received. And his account of you was the sweeter to us because he told things that you yourself could not write back even if I asked, lest you become the herald of your own praises, which holy Scripture forbids. Although I too am afraid to write these things to you, lest I incur the suspicion of flattery, my illustrious lord, justly most eminent, and son most dear in the love of Christ.

### Scripture references

- Prov 27:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Valerius, a count at the imperial court (named in the Retractations as the recipient of On Marriage and Concupiscence). Prov 27:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 200.1 (CSEL 57:293–294; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-1).

## Letter 200.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-2
- Source: CSEL 57:294
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Valerius's Catholic faith, humility, generosity, and zeal against heresy, while caring for heretics' salvation.

### Latin text

Laudes itaque tuas in Christo siue magis in te laudes Christi uide quid mihi delectationis et laetitiae fuit audire ab illo. qui nec fallere me posset propter fidem suam et eas ignorare non posset propter amicitiam tuam. sed alia et ab aliis etsi non tam multa uel certa uerum tamen audiuimus. fides tua quam sit sana et catholica. quam pia expectatio futurorum, quae dei fratrumque dilectio, quam non superbe sapias in excelsis honoribus nec speres in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo et diues sis in operibus bonis, quam sit domus tua requies solaciumque sanctorum et terror impiorum, quanta tibi cura sit. ne quis insidietur membris Christi coopertus uelamine nominis Christi siue in ueteribus eius siue in recentioribus inimicis, quamque sis eorundem inimicorum saluti prouidus, infestus errori. haec atque huius modi, ut dixi. et ab aliis solemus audire. sed nunc ea per supra dictum fratrem plura et testatiora cognouimus.

### English translation (Claude)

See, then, what delight and joy it was for me to hear your praises in Christ, or rather the praises of Christ in you, from a man who could neither deceive me, because of his faithfulness, nor be ignorant of them, because of his friendship with you. But we had heard other things from others too, though not so many or so certain: how sound and Catholic your faith is, how devout your expectation of things to come, what love you have for God and the brothers; how you are not haughty-minded in your lofty honors, nor hope in the uncertainty of riches but in the living God, and are rich in good works; how your house is a rest and comfort for the saints and a terror to the ungodly; how great a care you have that no one should lie in wait for the members of Christ while covered with the veil of Christ's name, whether among his old enemies or his more recent ones; and how provident you are for the salvation of those same enemies, while hostile to their error. These and suchlike things, as I said, we often hear from others too; but now, through the brother mentioned above, we have learned more of them and with surer testimony.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:17–18: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 6:17–18. The “old” and “recent” enemies are probably the Donatists and the Pelagians.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 200.2 (CSEL 57:294; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-2).

## Letter 200.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-3
- Source: CSEL 57:294–296
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Valerius's conjugal chastity and sends him a book on the subject, explained in its own preface.

### Latin text

Porro autem de pudicitia coniugali. ut eam quoque in te laudare et amare possimus, quid audiremus nisi ab aliquo interiore familiari tuo, qui uitam tuam non in superficie sed penitus nosset? de hoc itaque tuo bono, dei dono me quoque delectat familiarius et aliquanto diutius loqui tecum. scio me non esse oneri tibi, si aliquid prolixum mitto, quod legendo diutius sis nobiscum. nam et hoc comperi, quod inter tuas multas magnasque curas facile ac libenter legas nostrisque opusculis, etiam quae ad alios conscripsimus, si qua in manus tuas uenire potuerunt, admodum delecteris: quanto magis, quod ad te scribitur, ubi tamquam praesenti loquar, et aduertere dignaris attentius et accipere gratius! ab hac ergo epistula perge ad librum, quem simul misi. qui tuae reuerentiae, et cur conscriptus sit et cur ad te potissimum missus, ipse suo principio commodius intimabit.

### English translation (Claude)

Furthermore, as to your conjugal chastity, so that we may praise and love that too in you, from whom could we hear of it except from some close friend of yours, who knew your life not on the surface but deeply? It delights me, then, to speak with you more intimately and at somewhat greater length about this good of yours, the gift of God. I know that I am no burden to you if I send something long, so that by reading it you may be with us longer. For I have learned this too, that amid your many great cares you read easily and willingly, and take great delight in our little works, even those we have written to others, if any have been able to come into your hands; how much more will you be good enough to attend more closely and receive more gladly what is written to you, where I may speak as though to one present! From this letter, then, pass on to the book I have sent with it, which will itself make known to Your Reverence more conveniently, in its opening, both why it was written and why it was sent to you in particular.

### Translation notes

- The book is On Marriage and Concupiscence, Book 1, dedicated to Valerius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 200.3 (CSEL 57:294–296; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-200-3).

## Letter 201.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-201-1
- Source: CSEL 57:296–297
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The emperors Honorius and Theodosius II inform Bishop Aurelius of Carthage that they have renewed the decree expelling Pelagius and Caelestius and penalizing anyone who shelters them.

### Latin text

Dudum quidem fuerat constitutum, ut Pelagius atque Caelestius, infandi dogmatis repertores, ab urbe Roma uelut quaedam catholicae unitatis contagia pellerentur, ne ignorantium mentes scaeua persuasione peruerterent. in quo secuta est clementia nostra iudicium sanctitatis tuae. quo constat eos ab uniuersis iusta sententiae examinatione damnatos. sed quia obstinati criminis pertinax malum, ut constitutio geminaretur, exegit. recenti quoque sanctione decreuimus, ut, si quis eos in quacumque prouinciarum parte latitare non nesciens aut propellere aut prodere distulisset, praescriptae poenae uelut particeps subiaceret.

### English translation (Claude)

It had been decreed some time ago that Pelagius and Caelestius, the inventors of an abominable doctrine, should be driven from the city of Rome as a kind of contagion to Catholic unity, lest they pervert the minds of the ignorant by their perverse persuasion. In this our Clemency followed the judgment of Your Holiness, by which it is agreed that they were condemned by all after a just examination of the case. But since the stubborn evil of an obstinate crime required that the decree be repeated, we have decided by a recent enactment too that, if anyone, knowing that they are hiding in any part of the provinces, delays either to expel or to report them, he shall be subject to the prescribed penalty as an accomplice.

### Translation notes

- Imperial letter of Honorius and Theodosius II to Aurelius, bishop of Carthage (June 419); an identical copy was sent to Augustine. Its harsh measures against the Pelagians and their sympathizers are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 201.1 (CSEL 57:296–297; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-201-1).

## Letter 201.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-201-2
- Source: CSEL 57:297–299
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The emperors direct Aurelius to require all bishops to subscribe to the condemnation of Pelagius and Caelestius on pain of deposition, exile, and excommunication.

### Latin text

Praecipue tamen ad quorundam episcoporum pertinaciam corrigendam, qui prauas eorum disputationes uel tacito consensu adstruunt uel publica oppugnatione non destruunt, pater carissime atque amantissime. sanctitatis tuae auctoritatem manere conueniet. quatenus in abolitione praeposterae haeresis omnium deuotio Christiana consentiat. religio itaque tua competentibus scriptis uniuersos faciet admoneri scituros definitione sanctimonii tui hanc sibi definitionem esse praescriptam. ut, quicumque damnationi supra memoratorum, quo pateat mens pura, subscribere impia obstinatione neglexerint: episcopatus amissione multati interdicta in perpetuum expulsi ciuitatibus communione priuentur. nam cum ipsi iuxta synodum Nicaenam confessione sincera conditorem rerum omnium deum imperiique nostri ueneremur auctorem, non patietur sanctitas tua sectae detestabilis homines in iniuriam religionis noua et inusitata meditantes secretis tractatibus occultare sacrilegium publica semel auctoritate damnatum. una enim eademque culpa est eorum, qui aut dissimulando coniuentiam aut non damnando fauorem noxium praestiterunt. [Et alia manu:] Diuinitas te per multos annos seruet incolumem, pater carissime atque amantissime. Data V Idus Iunias Rauennae. eodem tenore etiam ad sanctum Augustinum episcopum data.

### English translation (Claude)

Above all, however, for correcting the obstinacy of certain bishops who either support their perverse arguments by tacit consent or do not destroy them by public opposition, it will be fitting, dearest and most loving father, that the authority of Your Holiness should stand, so that the Christian devotion of all may agree in the abolition of this preposterous heresy. Your Reverence will therefore have everyone admonished by suitable letters, so that they may know that by the decree of Your Holiness this rule is laid down for them: that whoever, from impious obstinacy, neglects to subscribe to the condemnation of the persons named above, so that his pure mind may be evident, shall be punished with the loss of the episcopate, expelled from their cities for ever, and deprived of communion. For since we ourselves, in accordance with the Council of Nicaea, worship with a sincere confession God, the Creator of all things and the author of our empire, Your Holiness will not allow men of a detestable sect, devising new and unheard-of things to the injury of religion, to conceal in secret discussions a sacrilege once condemned by public authority. For the guilt is one and the same for those who have given harmful favor either by pretending not to see, and so conniving, or by not condemning. [And in another hand:] May the Godhead keep you safe for many years, dearest and most loving father. Given on the fifth day before the Ides of June at Ravenna. A letter in the same terms was also given to the holy bishop Augustine.

### Translation notes

- Dated 9 June 419 at Ravenna. The phrase interdicta … communione is translated as “deprived of communion”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 201.2 (CSEL 57:297–299; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-201-2).

## Letter 202.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-202-1
- Source: CSEL 57:299–300
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome writes to Alypius and Augustine rejoicing that, with their help, the heresy of Caelestius has been defeated, though its adherents still hate them.

### Latin text

Sanctus Innocentius presbyter, qui huius sermonis est portitor, anno praeterito quasi nequaquam Africam reuersurus mea ad dignationem uestram scripta non sumpsit. tamen deo gratias agimus, quod ita euenit. ut nostrum silentium uestris epistulis uinceretis. mihi enim omnis occasio gratissima est, per quam scribo uestrae reuerentiae testem inuocans deum, quod. si possit fieri, adsumptis alis columbae uestris amplexibus implicarer semper quidem pro merito uirtutum uestrarum sed nunc maxime, quia cooperatoribus et auctoribus uobis haeresis Caelestina iugulata est. quae ita infecit corda multorum, ut, cum superatos damnatosque esse se sentiant. tamen uenena mentium non omittant et, quod solum possunt, nos oderint, per quos putant se libertatem docendi haereseos perdidisse.

### English translation (Claude)

The holy presbyter Innocent, the bearer of this letter, did not take a letter from me to Your Worthiness last year, as though he would never return to Africa. Yet we give thanks to God that it so turned out that you overcame our silence with your letters. For every opportunity is most welcome to me by which I write to Your Reverence, calling God to witness that, if it were possible, I would take the wings of a dove and be held in your embrace: always, indeed, because of the merit of your virtues, but now above all because, with you as fellow workers and leaders, the heresy of Caelestius has been slain. It has so infected the hearts of many that, though they feel themselves overcome and condemned, they still do not give up the poison of their minds, and, the only thing they can do, they hate us, through whom they think they have lost the freedom to teach heresy.

### Scripture references

- Ps 55:6 (54:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Jerome from Bethlehem to Alypius and Augustine (419). Ps 55:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 202.1 (CSEL 57:299–300; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-202-1).

## Letter 202.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-202-2
- Source: CSEL 57:300–302
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Jerome explains that grief and illness kept him from answering Annianus of Celeda, the Pelagian, and sends greetings from Albina, Pinianus, Melania, and Paula.

### Latin text

Quod autem quaeritis, utrum rescripserim contra libros Anniani, pseudodiaconi Celedensis, qui copiosissime pascitur, ut alienae blasphemiae uerba friuola subministret, sciatis me ipsos libros in schedulis missos a sancto fratre nostro Eusebio presbytero suscepisse non ante multum temporis et exinde uel ingruentibus morbis uel dormitione sanctae et uenerabilis filiae uestrae Eustochiae ita doluisse, ut propemodum contemnendos putarem; in eodem enim luto haesitat et exceptis uerbis tinnulis atque emendicatis nihil aliud loquitur. tamen multum egimus, ut, dum epistulae meae respondere conatur, apertius se proderet et blasphemias omnibus patefaceret. quicquid enim in miserabili illa synodo Diospolitana dixisse se denegat, in hoc opere profitetur. nec grande est ineptissimis naeniis respondere. si autem dominus uitam tribuerit et notariorum habuerimus copiam. paucis lucubratiunculis respondebimus, non ut conuincamus haeresim emortuam, sed ut inperitiam atque blasphemiam nostris sermonibus confutemus; meliusque hoc faceret sanctitas tua. ne compellamur contra haereticum nostra laudare. sancti filii communes. Albina. Pinianus et Melania, plurimum uos salutant. has litterulas de sancta Bethleem sancto presbytero Innocentio tradidi perferendas. neptis uestra Paula miserabiliter deprecatur. ut memores eius sitis, et multum uos salutat. incolumes uos et memores mei Christi domini nostri tueatur clementia, domini uere sancti atque omnium affectione uenerabiles patres.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your question whether I have written a reply against the books of Annianus, the pseudo-deacon of Celeda, who is most lavishly fed so that he may supply frivolous words for another's blasphemy, know that I received those very books, sent in sheets by our holy brother the presbyter Eusebius, not long ago; and since then, whether from illnesses coming upon me or from the falling asleep of your holy and venerable daughter Eustochium, I have grieved so much that I almost thought they should be ignored; for he sticks in the same mud and, apart from jingling and begged words, says nothing else. Yet we have achieved much, in that, while he tries to answer my letter, he has betrayed himself more openly and laid bare his blasphemies to all. For whatever he denies having said in that wretched synod of Diospolis, he professes in this work. Nor is it a great matter to answer the silliest trifles. But if the Lord grants me life and we have a supply of secretaries, we will answer in a few night's labors, not to refute a heresy that is already dead, but to confute ignorance and blasphemy by our words; and Your Holiness would do this better, so that we are not compelled to praise our own work against a heretic. Our common holy children, Albina, Pinianus, and Melania, send you warmest greetings. I have handed this little letter from holy Bethlehem to the holy presbyter Innocent to deliver. Your niece Paula earnestly begs you to remember her, and sends you warm greetings. May the mercy of Christ our Lord keep you safe and mindful of me, truly holy lords and fathers venerable in the affection of all.

### Translation notes

- Annianus of Celeda wrote in support of Pelagius against Jerome's Dialogue against the Pelagians; the “synod of Diospolis” (415) acquitted Pelagius. Eustochium died about 419. “Your niece” (neptis uestra, also “granddaughter”) is used affectionately of the younger Paula, Eustochium's niece.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 202.2 (CSEL 57:300–302; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-202-2).

## Letter 203.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-203-1
- Source: CSEL 57:315–317
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Largus, after his worldly misfortunes, to despise the vanities of this world and turn to the hope of the godly.

### Latin text

Accepi litteras eximietatis tuae, quibus me ad te petis ut scriberem. quod quidem non desiderares, nisi et hoc, quod me posse scribere existimasti. gratum haberes atque iucundum, id autem est, ut uana saeculi huius, si inexperta concupisti, experta contemnas. fallax est enim in eis suauitas et infructuosus labor et perpetuus timor et periculosa sublimitas, initium sine prouidentia et finis cum paenitentia. ita se habent omnia, quae in ista mortalitatis aerumna cupidius quam prudentius appetuntur. alia est autem spes piorum alius laboris fructus alia periculorum merces. nam in hoc mundo non timere, non dolere, non laborare, non periclitari inpossibile est; sed plurimum interest, qua causa, qua expectatione, quo termino quisque ista patiatur. ego quidem cum amatores saeculi huius intueor, nescio, quando possit esse ad eorum animos sanandos opportuna sapientia. quando enim res uelut prosperas habent, fastu respuunt salubres monitus et quasi anilem reputant cantilenam; quando autem in aduersis anguntur, magis cogitant euadere, unde ad praesens anguntur. quam capere, unde curentur et unde perueniant, ubi angi omnino non possunt. aliquando tamen quidam cordis aures admouent atque adhibent ueritati rarius inter prospera, crebrius inter aduersa, sed tamen pauci sunt, ita enim praedicti sunt, inter quos te esse cupio, quia ueraciter diligo, domine insignis et praestantissime ac desiderantissime fili. haec admonitio tibi sit mea resalutatio, quia, etsi te deinceps talia perpeti, qualia pertulisti, plus tamen nolo haec ipsa te sine aliqua in melius uitae mutatione fuisse perpessum.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received the letter of Your Eminence, in which you ask me to write to you. You would not desire this unless you also found pleasing and welcome what you thought I could write; and that is, that if you desired the vanities of this world without having experienced them, you should despise them now that you have experienced them. For in them the sweetness is deceptive, the labor fruitless, the fear perpetual, the eminence dangerous; the beginning is without foresight and the end with regret. So it is with all things that in this toil of mortality are sought more eagerly than prudently. But the hope of the godly is different, the fruit of their labor different, the reward of their dangers different. For in this world it is impossible not to fear, not to grieve, not to labor, not to be in danger; but it makes a great difference for what cause, with what expectation, to what end each one suffers these things. For my part, when I look at the lovers of this world, I do not know when wisdom could be opportune for healing their minds. For when their affairs are, as it were, prosperous, they reject wholesome warnings with disdain and regard them as an old wives' tale; but when they are in distress in adversity, they think more of escaping what distresses them for the present than of grasping what may heal them and bring them where they can never be distressed at all. Yet sometimes some bring the ears of the heart near and apply them to the truth, more rarely in prosperity, more often in adversity; but they are few, for so it was foretold, and I want you to be among them, because I truly love you, my distinguished lord and most eminent and most longed-for son. Let this admonition be my return of your greeting; for although I do not want you to suffer hereafter such things as you have endured, still more do I not want you to have endured them without some change of life for the better.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:14: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 22:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Largus, a proconsul (named in some manuscripts). Matt 7:14; Matt 22:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 203.1 (CSEL 57:315–317; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/199-40/#p-203-1).

## Letter 204.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-1
- Source: CSEL 57:317–318
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to the tribune Dulcitius, explaining that the suicides of some Donatists should not halt the work of bringing the many back to unity.

### Latin text

Non debui contemnere petitionem tuam, qua desiderasti a me institui, quem ad modum te oporteat haereticis respondere, quorum salus in domini misericordia instantia quoque tuae strenuitatis inquiritur. quamuis enim ingentes eorum multitudines. unde plurimum gratulamur, quid sibi beneficii conferatur, intellegant, quidam tamen eorum et deo et hominibus miserabili instinctu furoris ingrati, ubi suis caedibus nos uastare non possunt, suo nos exitio terrere se credunt aut suam laetitiam quaerentes de mortibus nostris aut nostram tristitiam de mortibus suis. sed non debet tot tantorumque populorum salutem furiosus error hominum impedire paucorum. quid eis uelimus, non solum deus et prudentes homines uerum etiam ipsi, cum sint nobis inimicissimi, sentiunt. cum enim sua pernicie terrendos nos putant, non dubitant nos timere. ne pereant.

### English translation (Claude)

I ought not to disregard your request, in which you asked me to instruct you how you should answer the heretics, whose salvation in the Lord's mercy is also being sought by the zeal of your energy. For although huge crowds of them (at which we rejoice greatly) understand what benefit is being conferred on them, some of them, by a pitiable impulse of madness ungrateful both to God and to men, when they cannot lay us waste by murdering us, believe they can frighten us by their own destruction, seeking either their own joy from our deaths or our grief from their deaths. But the mad error of a few men ought not to hinder the salvation of so many great peoples. What we wish for them, not only God and wise men but even they themselves, though they are most hostile to us, perceive; for when they think we can be frightened by their own ruin, they do not doubt that we fear lest they perish.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Dulcitius, the imperial tribune enforcing the laws against the Donatists in Numidia (ca. 420). The Donatists' threats of suicide and the coercive policy are described as Augustine writes them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.1 (CSEL 57:317–318; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-1).

## Letter 204.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-2
- Source: CSEL 57:318
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the many returning to unity outweigh the few Donatists who kill themselves, comparing the Church's grief to David's mourning for Absalom.

### Latin text

Sed quid faciamus uidentes, quam multi adiuuante domino per occasionem uestram uiam pacis inueniant? numquid prohibere uos possumus uel debemus ab hac unitatis instantia. dum timemus. ne quidam durissimi et in se ipsos crudelissimi non nostra sed propria uoluntate se perdant? optaremus quidem, ut omnes, qui contra Christum portant signum Christi et contra euangelium de ipso euangelio, quod non intellegunt. gloriantur, a sua peruersitate discederent et nobiscum in eius unitate gauderent. sed quoniam deus occulta satis dispositione sed tamen iusta nonnullos eorum poenis praedestinauit extremis, procul dubio melius incomparabili numerositate plurimis ab illa pestifera diuisione et dispersione redintegratis atque collectis quidam suis ignibus pereunt, quam pariter uniuersi sempiternis ignibus gehennarum merito sacrilegae dissensionis ardebunt. sic enim pereuntes istos dolet ecclesia, quem ad modum rebellem filium sanctus Dauid, de cuius salute seruanda sollicita dilectione mandauerat. nam eum merito nefandae impietatis extinctum etiam testimonio lacrimosae uocis ingemuit; uerum tamen superbo et maligno discedente in locum suum populus dei. qui fuerat illius tyrannide diuisus, cognouit regem suum et de amisso filio maerorem patris perfectio consolata est unitatis.

### English translation (Claude)

But what are we to do, seeing how many, with the Lord's help, are finding the way of peace through the occasion you provide? Can we, or ought we to, hold you back from this pressing for unity, out of fear that some most obstinate men, most cruel to themselves, may destroy themselves, not by our will but by their own? We would indeed wish that all who carry the sign of Christ against Christ, and who glory in the very gospel, which they do not understand, against the gospel, would depart from their perversity and rejoice with us in his unity. But since God, by a disposition that is hidden indeed but still just, has predestined some of them to the extreme penalties, it is beyond doubt better that, while incomparably greater numbers are restored and gathered from that pestilent division and dispersion, some perish in their own fires, than that all alike should burn in the everlasting fires of hell, as they deserve for their sacrilegious dissension. For the Church grieves for these who perish as holy David grieved for his rebellious son, for the preservation of whose life he had given orders out of anxious love. For when he was killed, as his abominable impiety deserved, David lamented him with the witness of a tearful voice; but when the proud and wicked one had gone to his own place, the people of God, which had been divided by his tyranny, recognized its king, and the completeness of unity consoled the father's grief for the son he had lost.

### Scripture references

- 2 Sam 18:5: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Sam 18:33: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:25: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Sam 18:5, 33–19:14 (Absalom); Acts 1:25 (“his own place”). Augustine's statement that God “predestined some of them to the extreme penalties” is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.2 (CSEL 57:318; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-2).

## Letter 204.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-3
- Source: CSEL 57:318–319
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine approves Dulcitius's edicts at Thamugadi but notes the Donatists misread his words as a death threat, since he had no power to execute them.

### Latin text

Non itaque reprehendimus. domine eximie et honorabilis fili, quod tales homines apud Tamugadem prius edicto admonendos existimasti: sed quod ibi dixisti: Noueritis uos debitae neci dandos, putauerunt, sicut eorum rescripta indicant, hoc te fuisse comminatum. quod tu illos adprehensos fueras occisurus, non intellegentes de illa nece, quam sibi ipsi uolunt ingerere, te locutum. non enim tu in eos ius gladii ullis legibus accepisti aut imperialibus institutis, quorum tibi iniuncta est executio, hoc praeceptum est, ut necentur. secundo sane edicto dilectionis tuae planius, quid uolueris, aperuisti. quod autem etiam ipsum episcopum eorum putasti litteris adloquendum. humanissime ostendisti, quanta mansuetudine temperati sint in catholica ecclesia, etiam qui potestate Christiani imperatoris siue tenendo siue plectendo corrigendis praeficiuntur erroribus, nisi quod honorificentioribus eum uerbis tractasti, quam decebat haereticum.

### English translation (Claude)

So we do not find fault, my excellent lord and honorable son, with your thinking that such men at Thamugadi should first be admonished by an edict. But as to what you said there, “Know that you will be given over to the death you deserve,” they thought, as their replies show, that you had threatened that you would kill them once arrested, not understanding that you were speaking of that death which they wish to inflict on themselves. For you have not received the right of the sword against them by any laws, nor do the imperial ordinances whose execution has been entrusted to you command that they be put to death. In your second edict, of course, Your Charity made what you meant clearer. And in thinking that their bishop himself should be addressed by letter, you showed most humanely with what gentleness even those are tempered in the Catholic Church who by the power of the Christian emperor are set over the correction of errors, whether by detaining or by punishing; except that you treated him in more honorific words than befitted a heretic.

### Translation notes

- Thamugadi (Timgad) in Numidia; its Donatist bishop was Gaudentius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.3 (CSEL 57:318–319; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-3).

## Letter 204.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-4
- Source: CSEL 57:319–320
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recalls his earlier arguments that the cause, not the punishment, makes a martyr, that rulers may punish sacrilege, and that receiving Donatists without rebaptism does not mean receiving them unchanged.

### Latin text

Sed quod eius responsioni me respondere uoluisti. credo te arbitratum etiam hoc Tamugadensibus debere praestari, ut fallax doctrina ipsius, a quo seducebantur, aliquanto diligentius refellatur. uerum nos et occupatissimi sumus et in aliis plurimis opusculis nostris huius modi uaniloquia refutauimus. iam enim nescio quotiens disputando et scribendo monstrauimus non eos posse habere martyrum mortem, quia Christianorum non habent uitam, cum martyrem non faciat poena sed causa. docuimus etiam liberum arbitrium sic homini datum, ut tamen et diuinis legibus et humanis rectissime grauium supplicia constituta sint peccatorum, et pertinere ad religiosos reges terrae non solum adulteria uel homicidia uel huiusce modi alia flagitia seu facinora uerum etiam sacrilegia seueritate congrua cohibere multumque illos falli, qui putant a nobis istos tales suscipi, quales sunt. quia non eos rebaptizamus. quo modo enim tales suscipiuntur, quales sunt, cum sint haeretici et ad nos transeundo fiant catholici? neque enim propterea corda deprauata non licet corrigi quia sacramenta semel data non licet iterari.

### English translation (Claude)

But in wishing me to answer his reply, I believe you thought this too was owed to the people of Thamugadi, that the deceitful teaching of the one by whom they were being led astray should be refuted somewhat more carefully. But we are very busy, and we have refuted empty talk of this kind in very many other works of ours. For I do not know how many times we have already shown, in argument and in writing, that they cannot have the death of martyrs because they do not have the life of Christians, since it is not the punishment but the cause that makes a martyr. We have also taught that free will was given to man in such a way that nonetheless punishments for grave sins have been most rightly established by both divine and human laws; and that it belongs to the religious kings of the earth to restrain with fitting severity not only adulteries or murders or other such crimes and outrages, but also sacrileges; and that those are much mistaken who think we receive such people as they are, because we do not rebaptize them. For how are they received as they are, when they are heretics and by passing over to us become Catholics? For it is not the case that depraved hearts may not be corrected because sacraments once given may not be repeated.

### Translation notes

- Augustine summarizes arguments made in his anti-Donatist works (e.g. Letters 93 and 185). His defence of imperial coercion is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.4 (CSEL 57:319–320; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-4).

## Letter 204.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-5
- Source: CSEL 57:320
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Scripture that suicide is murder, since even killing a dying man at his request is forbidden.

### Latin text

De mortibus autem furiosissimis, quas quidam eorum ipsi sibi inferunt, de quibus solent detestabiles et abominabiles esse multis etiam suis, quorum mentes dementatio non tanta possedit, eis secundum scripturas rationemque Christianorum saepe respondimus. quoniam scriptum est: Qui sibi nequam est, cui bonus est? aut certe in eisdem positum temptationibus mori uolentem occidat et proximum. qui sibi expedire et licere putat occidere se ipsum, quoniam scriptura dicit: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. nullis autem iubentibus legibus uel legitimis potestatibus non licere alterum occidere etiam uolentem et petentem et uiuere iam non ualentem satis indicat scriptura regnorum, ubi rex Dauid regis Saulis interfectorem iussit occidi, cum ille dixisset ab eo iam saucio atque semiuiuo petitum se fuisse. ut hoc faceret et animam corporis nexibus obluctantem soluique cupientem uno ictu uulneris ab illis cruciatibus liberaret. proinde quia omnis, qui sine ulla legitimae potestatis auctoritate hominem occidit, homicida est, quisquis se ipsum occidit, non sit homicida, si homo non est. haec omnia multis modis in aliis pluribus nostris sermonibus et litteris diximus

### English translation (Claude)

As for the most frenzied deaths that some of them inflict on themselves, for which they are commonly held detestable and abominable even by many of their own, whose minds such madness has not possessed, we have often answered them according to the Scriptures and Christian reason; for it is written, “He who is evil to himself, to whom will he be good?” Or certainly, let one who thinks it expedient and lawful for himself to kill himself, when placed in the same temptations, kill his neighbor too if he wishes to die, since Scripture says, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” But that it is not lawful, without the command of laws or lawful authorities, to kill another, even one who wishes and asks for it and can no longer live, the scripture of the Kingdoms shows clearly enough, where King David ordered the slayer of King Saul to be killed, although he had said that Saul, already wounded and half alive, had asked him to do this and to free with a single blow from those torments a soul struggling with the bonds of the body and longing to be released. Accordingly, since everyone who kills a human being without the authority of any lawful power is a murderer, whoever kills himself is not a murderer only if he is not a human being. All this we have said in many ways in many other sermons and letters of ours.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:39: quotation, high confidence
- Lev 19:18: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Sam 1:6–16: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 14:5 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sir 14:5 (Sirach is outside the 66 books); Matt 22:39 (Lev 19:18); 2 Sam 1:6–16 (the Amalekite who claimed to have killed Saul).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.5 (CSEL 57:320; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-5).

## Letter 204.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-6
- Source: CSEL 57:320–321
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers the Donatists' appeal to Razis in 2 Maccabees by arguing that not every deed recorded in Scripture is to be imitated, and that Razis acted from pride.

### Latin text

Verum tamen, quod fatendum est, de isto Raxio seniore. quem summa exemplorum inopia coartati se in Machabaeorum libris quasi ad auctoritatem sceleris, quo se ipsos perdunt. perscrutatis omnibus ecclesiasticis auctoritatibus uix aliquando se inuenisse gloriantur, adhuc eis numquam respondisse me recolo. sed. quod tuae caritati et prudentibus quibusque sufficiat ad istos redarguendos, si ad uitam christianorum de Iudaea gente atque illis litteris parati sunt omnium factorum exempla transferre, tunc et hoc transferant. si autem sunt illic plurima eorum quoque hominum, qui litterarum illarum ueritate laudati sunt. uel huic iam tempori non conuenientia uel etiam illo tempore non recte facta, tale etiam hoc est, quod in se ipsum Raxius iste commisit. qui cum esset apud suos nobilis et multum in Iudaismo profecisset, quae sibi in comparatione iustitiae Christianae damna et stercora fuisse dicit apostolus, et propter haec idem Raxius Iudaeorum pater appellaretur, quid mirum est, si tamquam homini elatio superba subrepsit. ut mallet manu propria perimi quam post illam in suorum aspectibus celsitudinem sustinere indignam in hostium manibus seruitutem?

### English translation (Claude)

Nevertheless, I must admit that I do not recall having ever yet answered them about that elder Razis, whom, constrained by an extreme lack of examples, they boast that they have scarcely at last found in the books of the Maccabees, after searching all the church's authorities, as an authority for the crime by which they destroy themselves. But here is what may suffice for Your Charity and for all prudent people to refute them: if they are prepared to carry over to the life of Christians examples of all the deeds of the Jewish people and of those writings, then let them carry over this one too. But if there are very many deeds there, even of those men who are praised by the truth of those writings, which are either not suited to this present time or were not rightly done even at that time, of that kind too is what this Razis committed against himself. Since he was noble among his own people and had advanced far in Judaism (which the apostle says were losses and refuse to him in comparison with Christian righteousness), and since for these reasons this same Razis was called father of the Jews, what wonder is it if, as a man, proud elation crept in on him, so that he preferred to die by his own hand rather than, after that eminence in the sight of his people, endure unworthy slavery in the hands of his enemies?

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:7–8: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 1:14: echo, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 14:37–46 (2 Maccabees): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Macc 14:37–46 (Razis); Phil 3:7–8; Gal 1:14. Augustine's remarks on Judaism are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.6 (CSEL 57:320–321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-6).

## Letter 204.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-7
- Source: CSEL 57:321–322
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Scripture narrates rather than praises Razis's suicide, and that by Sirach's standard he showed impatience rather than wisdom.

### Latin text

Solent in litteris gentium ista laudari. in his autem Machabaeorum libris quamuis homo fuerit ipse laudatus, factum tamen eius narratum est, non laudatum, et iudicandum potius quam imitandum ante oculos constitutum, non sane nostro iudicio iudicandum, quod nos quoque ut homines habere possemus, sed iudicio doctrinae sobriae, quae in ipsis quoque libris ueteribus clara est. longe quippe fuit iste Raxius a uerbis illis, ubi legitur: Omne, quod tibi applicitum fuerit, accipe et in dolore sustine et in humilitate tua patientiam habe. non ergo fuit iste uir eligendae mortis sapiens sed ferendae humilitatis inpatiens.

### English translation (Claude)

Such deeds are often praised in the literature of the Gentiles. But in these books of the Maccabees, although the man himself was praised, his deed was narrated, not praised, and set before our eyes to be judged rather than imitated; to be judged, of course, not by our own judgment, which we too as human beings could have, but by the judgment of sober teaching, which is clear even in those ancient books themselves. For this Razis was far from those words where we read: “Accept whatever is brought upon you, and endure it in pain, and in your humiliation have patience.” So this man was not wise in choosing death, but impatient in bearing humiliation.

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 14:37–46 (2 Maccabees): allusion, high confidence
- Sir 2:4 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Sir 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.7 (CSEL 57:321–322; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-7).

## Letter 204.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-8
- Source: CSEL 57:322
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Razis's death, though great, was not good, since either he was not righteous or his killing himself was the killing of a righteous man.

### Latin text

Scriptum est, quod uoluerit nobiliter et uiriliter mori; sed numquid ideo sapienter? nobiliter scilicet, ne libertatem sui generis captiuus amitteret, uiriliter autem, quod tantas uires animi haberet, quibus idoneus esset, ut se ipse perimeret. quod gladio cum implere non posset, de muro se praecipitem dedit et sic adhuc uiuus abruptam cucurrit ad petram atque ibi iam exanguis intestina sua produxit, quae utraque manu dissipata spargebat in populum, ac deinde postea defessus occubuit. magna sunt haec nec tamen bona; non enim bonum est omne, quod magnum est, quoniam sunt magna etiam mala. deus dixit: Innocentem et iustum ne occidas. si ergo iste innocens et iustus non fuit, cur proponitur imitandus? si autem innocens et iustus fuit. quare interfector innocentis et iusti, id est ipsius Raxii insuper putatur esse laudandus?

### English translation (Claude)

It is written that he wished to die nobly and manfully; but does that mean wisely? Nobly, that is, so as not to lose the freedom of his birth as a captive; manfully, because he had such strength of mind as made him able to kill himself. When he could not accomplish it with the sword, he threw himself headlong from the wall, and so, still alive, ran to a steep rock, and there, already drained of blood, he drew out his entrails, and, tearing them apart with both hands, scattered them on the people, and then afterward, exhausted, he fell dead. These things are great, yet not good; for not everything that is great is good, since there are great evils too. God said, “Do not kill the innocent and the righteous.” If, then, this man was not innocent and righteous, why is he set forth to be imitated? But if he was innocent and righteous, why is the killer of an innocent and righteous man, that is, of Razis himself, thought to be praiseworthy besides?

### Scripture references

- Exod 23:7: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 14:42–46 (2 Maccabees): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Macc 14:42–46; Exod 23:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.8 (CSEL 57:322; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-8).

## Letter 204.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-9
- Source: CSEL 57:322–323
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine promises the people of Thamugadi a full reply to both letters of Gaudentius, the Donatist bishop.

### Latin text

Haec interim, ne nimium prolixa fiat, huic epistulae implendae satis sint. debeo autem Tamugadensibus eius modi ministerium caritatis, quoniam mihi et uoto tuo et ab honorabili et carissimo filio meo Eleusino, qui tribunatum apud eos egit, bene insinuati sunt, ut ambabus epistulis Gaudentii, Donatistarum episcopi, et maxime posteriori, quam secundum scripturas sacras se fecisse arbitratur, ita respondeam, ne aliquid praetermissum putetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let this suffice for the present to fill this letter, so that it does not become too long. But I owe the people of Thamugadi a service of love of this kind, since they have been well commended to me both by your wish and by my honorable and dearest son Eleusinus, who served as tribune among them: namely, to reply to both letters of Gaudentius, the bishop of the Donatists, and above all to the second, which he thinks he composed according to the holy Scriptures, in such a way that nothing may be thought to have been passed over.

### Translation notes

- The reply is Augustine's Against Gaudentius (Contra Gaudentium).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 204.9 (CSEL 57:322–323; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/204-1/#p-204-9).

## Letter 205.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-1
- Source: CSEL 57:323–324
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Consentius that he knows him by his mind though not by sight, and turns to answer the questions he sent.

### Latin text

Quantum ad oculos adtinet corporales, quosdam uidemus nec nouimus, quorum a nobis uita studiaque nesciuntur; quosdam nouimus nec uidemus, quorum nobis cantu et affectus innotuit, in quibus et te adnumeramus; et ideo te magis uidere desideramus, ut in his sis, quos et uidemus et nouimus. nam illi. qui ignoti nostris oculis ingeruntur, non solum desiderabiles non sunt. sed uix tolerabiles sunt, nisi aliquibus signis pulchritudo in eis hominis interioris appareat. quorum autem sicut tuus nobis prius animus intellegendo quam uidendo corpus apparuit, iam quidem nouimus eos, sed ideo etiam uidere desideramus, ut per illud, quod conspicitur oculis, multo iucundius et familiarius eo, quem iam nouimus, amico interiore perfruamur. uerum et hoc de te nobis deus fortasse donabit quietioribus et tranquillioribus. sicut optamus, rebus humanis, ut id honestae caritatis sit potius quam molestae necessitatis. nunc ad ea respondeam, sicut domino adiuuante potuero, quae praeter epistulam in alia chartula a me quaerenda misisti.

### English translation (Claude)

As far as the eyes of the body are concerned, some people we see and do not know, since their lives and pursuits are unknown to us; some we know and do not see, whose love and affection have become known to us, and among these we count you too; and so we desire all the more to see you, so that you may be among those whom we both see and know. For those who are thrust before our eyes as strangers are not only not desirable but scarcely tolerable, unless the beauty of the inner man appears in them by some signs. But as for those whose mind, like yours, has appeared to us by understanding before their body was seen, we already know them, but we desire to see them too, so that through what is seen with the eyes we may enjoy much more pleasantly and familiarly the inner friend we already know. But perhaps God will grant us this too in your case, when human affairs are quieter and more tranquil, as we wish, so that it may be a matter of honorable love rather than of troublesome necessity. Now let me answer, as far as I can with the Lord's help, the questions you sent me on another sheet besides the letter.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Consentius, a layman from the Balearic Islands. The word cantu in the digital text (cantu et affectus) is probably a slip for caritas; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.1 (CSEL 57:323–324; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-1).

## Letter 205.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-2
- Source: CSEL 57:324–325
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Consentius that Christ's risen body is in heaven as it was when he ascended, with flesh and bones, preserved from corruption by God's power.

### Latin text

Quaeris, utrum nunc corpus domini ossa et sanguinem habeat aut reliqua carnis liniamenta. quid, si adderes, utrum etiam uestimenta, nonne augeretur quaestio? qua causa. nisi quia ea, quae in usu uitae huius nostrae corruptibilia nouimus. sine corruptione cogitare uix possumus, cum diuinorum miraculorum quaedam documenta iam data sint, ex quibus liceat coniectare maiora? nam si uestis Israhelitarum per tot annos in heremo sine tritura esse potuit, si morticina pellis calciamentorum tam diu sine labe durauit, potest utique deus quorumlibet corporum, per quantum uoluerit tempus, incorruptam protendere qualitatem. ego proinde domini corpus ita in caelo esse credo, ut erat, quando ascendit in caelum. dixerat autem discipulis, ut in euangelio legimus, de sua resurrectione dubitantibus et illud, quod uidebant, non corpus sed spiritum esse putantibus: Videte manus meas et pedes; palpate et uidete, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me uidetis habere. sic eorum, cum esset in terra, contrectatus est manibus, sic eorum est, cum iret in caelum, deductus aspectibus. ibi uox angelica sonuit: Sic ueniet, quem ad modum uidistis eum euntem in caelum. fides adsit et nulla quaestio remanebit.

### English translation (Claude)

You ask whether the Lord's body now has bones and blood, or the other features of flesh. What if you were to add whether it also has clothing: would the question not grow? For what reason, except that we can scarcely conceive of things without corruption which we know to be corruptible in the use of this life of ours, although certain proofs of divine miracles have already been given, from which one may infer greater ones? For if the clothing of the Israelites could last so many years in the desert without wearing out, if the dead hide of their shoes lasted so long without decay, God can certainly extend the incorrupt condition of any bodies whatever for as long as he wills. I therefore believe that the Lord's body is in heaven as it was when he ascended into heaven. And he had said to his disciples, as we read in the gospel, when they doubted his resurrection and thought that what they saw was not a body but a spirit: “See my hands and feet; handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have.” So, while he was on earth, he was handled by their hands; so, when he went into heaven, he was taken away from their sight. There an angelic voice sounded: “He will come in the same way as you saw him going into heaven.” Let faith be present, and no question will remain.

### Scripture references

- Deut 29:5: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:37–39: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 1:9: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 1:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Deut 29:5 (cf. Deut 8:4); Luke 24:37–39; Acts 1:9, 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.2 (CSEL 57:324–325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-2).

## Letter 205.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-3
- Source: CSEL 57:325
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine declines to speculate about blood or the bodily humors in Christ's risen body, insisting only that it is free of corruption.

### Latin text

nisi forte de sanguine requirendum est, quia, cum dixisset: Palpate et uidete, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, non addidit sanguinem. non ergo et nos addamus inquirere, quod ille non addidit dicere. et de compendio, si placet, finita sit quaestio; fortassis enim accepta occasione sanguinis urgebit nos molestior perscrutator et dicet: Si sanguis, cur non et pituita, cur non et fel flauum et fel nigrum, quibus quattuor humoribus naturam carnis temperari etiam medicinae disciplina testatur? sed quodlibet quisque addat, corruptionem addere caueat, ne suae fidei sanitatem castitatemque corrumpat.

### English translation (Claude)

Unless perhaps one must inquire about the blood, since, when he had said, “Handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh,” he did not add blood. Let us not, then, add an inquiry into what he did not add in speaking. And, if you please, let the question be ended briefly; for perhaps a more troublesome investigator, seizing the occasion of the blood, will press us and say: “If blood, why not phlegm too, why not yellow bile and black bile, the four humors by which, as even medical science testifies, the nature of the flesh is tempered?” But whatever anyone may add, let him beware of adding corruption, lest he corrupt the soundness and purity of his own faith.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:39: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 24:39. The four humors of ancient medicine: blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.3 (CSEL 57:325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-3).

## Letter 205.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-4
- Source: CSEL 57:325–327
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from the three young men in the furnace that God can preserve the features of a body while removing all corruption from it.

### Latin text

Ex consuetudine rerum expertarum inexperta opera diuina infirmitas metitur humana et acutule se garrire arbitratur. cum dicit: Si caro est, et sanguis est; si sanguis, et ceteri humores: si ceteri humores, ergo et corruptio. eo modo diceret: Si flamma est, et ardet; si ardet, et urit; si urit, ergo et uirorum trium in fornacem ignis ab impio rege missorum corpora incendit. si autem hoc in tribus uiris miraculum factum esse non dubitat, quisquis de diuinis operibus recte sapit, cur non credatur, qui fecit illa corpora non posse igne corrumpi, fecisse illud corpus nec igne nec fame nec morbo nec senio nec ulla ui alia, qua solet humana corpora labefactare corruptio? quod si quisquam dicit non carni trium illorum uirorum additam contra ignem incorruptionem, sed ipsi igni detractam corrumpendi facultatem, quid ueremur, ne carnem facere nequiuerit non posse corrumpi, qui fecit ignem non posse corrumpere? nam si illud non de carnis sed de ignis mutatione intellegitur, multo est mirabilius; simul enim et hominum corpora non urebat, ne posset nocere, et ligna fornacis urebat. ut posset ardere. sed qui etiam ista non credunt, nimium de diuina potestate diffidunt nec cum eis uel ad eos nunc sermo nobis est; qui autem ista credunt, ex his etiam illa utcumque coniciant, quae fideliter quaerunt. ualet igitur diuina potentia de ista uisibili atque tractabili natura corporum quibusdam manentibus auferre, quas uoluerit, qualitates ac per hoc ualet etiam membra mortalia formae liniamentis manentibus corruptione uero mortalitatis emortua stabili uigore firmare, ut absit labes, adsit effigies, adsit motio, absit fatigatio, adsit uescendi potestas. absit esuriendi necessitas

### English translation (Claude)

Human weakness measures divine works it has not experienced by the habit of things it has experienced, and thinks itself clever in its chatter when it says: “If it is flesh, it has blood too; if blood, the other humors too; if the other humors, then corruption too.” In the same way it might say: “If it is flame, it burns; if it burns, it scorches; if it scorches, then it set fire to the bodies of the three men thrown into the furnace of fire by the ungodly king.” But if no one who thinks rightly about divine works doubts that this miracle was done in the three men, why should it not be believed that he who made those bodies incapable of being corrupted by fire made that body incapable of being corrupted by fire, hunger, disease, old age, or any other force by which corruption commonly undermines human bodies? And if anyone says that incorruptibility against fire was not added to the flesh of those three men, but that the power of corrupting was taken away from the fire itself, why should we fear that he who made fire unable to corrupt could not make flesh unable to be corrupted? For if that is understood as a change not of the flesh but of the fire, it is much more wonderful; for at the same time it did not burn the bodies of the men, so as to be unable to harm them, and it did burn the wood of the furnace, so as to be able to blaze. But those who do not believe even these things distrust the divine power too much, and our discourse now is neither with them nor to them; but let those who believe these things infer from them in some way the things they faithfully inquire about. So the divine power is able, while some qualities of this visible and tangible nature of bodies remain, to take away whatever qualities it wills; and through this it is able also to strengthen mortal members with stable vigor, the features of their form remaining but the corruption of mortality having died away, so that decay is absent while the likeness is present, movement present and fatigue absent, the power of eating present and the necessity of hunger absent.

### Scripture references

- Dan 3:19–27: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 24:42–43: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Dan 3:19–27; Luke 24:42–43 (the risen Christ eats).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.4 (CSEL 57:325–327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-4).

## Letter 205.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-5
- Source: CSEL 57:327
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that in 1 Corinthians 15:50 "flesh and blood" means the corruption of flesh, not its substance, since Christ's risen flesh cannot wither.

### Latin text

Quod ergo legitur apud apostolum: Caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, soluitur quidem quaestio etiam isto modo, quem tu commemorasti, ut carnis et sanguinis nomine opera carnis et sanguinis intellegantur; uerum, quia non de operibus sed de modo resurrectionis loquebatur apostolus et eam quaestionem disputando uersabat, melius eo loco intellegitur caro et sanguis pro corruptione carnis et sanguinis posita. si enim nomen carnis significat operationem. cur non significet etiam corruptionem, sicut dictum est: Omnis caro faenum? nam et hic ipsa corruptibilitas significata est; sequitur enim: Et omnis honor carnis ut flos faeni: faenum aruit. flos decidit. numquidnam hoc etiam illi carni competit, de qua dictum est: Palpate et uidete. quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me uidetis habere? nam quo modo arescat aut decidat, cum scriptum sit, quod Christus surgens a mortuis iam non moriatur et mors ei ultra non dominetur?

### English translation (Claude)

As for what we read in the apostle, “Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God,” the question is indeed resolved also in the way you mentioned, that by the name of flesh and blood the works of flesh and blood are to be understood; but since the apostle was speaking not of works but of the manner of the resurrection, and was dealing with that question in his argument, in that place flesh and blood are better understood as put for the corruption of flesh and blood. For if the word “flesh” signifies activity, why should it not also signify corruption, as it is said, “All flesh is grass”? For here too corruptibility itself is signified; for it continues, “And all the glory of flesh is like the flower of grass; the grass withers, the flower falls.” Does this apply also to that flesh of which it was said, “Handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have”? For how could it wither or fall, when it is written that Christ, rising from the dead, dies no more, and death no longer has dominion over him?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:50: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:6–7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Pet 1:24: quotation, medium confidence
- Luke 24:39: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:50; Isa 40:6–7 (1 Pet 1:24); Luke 24:39; Rom 6:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.5 (CSEL 57:327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-5).

## Letter 205.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-6
- Source: CSEL 57:327–328
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains Paul's seed analogy: if God can add to a bare seed what it lacked, he can much more restore what belonged to the human body.

### Latin text

Proinde ipsam apostolicam sententiam desuper inspice totamque considera. cum resurrectionem mortuorum persuadere uellet eis, qui dicebant, quia resurrectio mortuorum non est, Christi resurrectione praemissa in exemplum inter cetera, quae ibi disseruit, intulit sibi quaestionem atque ait: Sed dicet aliquis: Quo modo resurgent mortui? quo autem corpore uenient? id est quali corpore. deinde adhibens documenta seminum: Stulte, inquit, tu quod seminas, non uiuificatur, nisi moriatur, et quod seminas, non corpus, quod futurum est, seminas sed nudum granum fere tritici aut alicuius ceterorum; deus autem illi dat corpus, quo modo uoluerit, et uni cuique seminum proprium corpus. secundum hoc ergo dixerat: Non corpus, quod futurum est, seminas. neque enim non triticum erit ex tritico; sed, quia nemo seminat herbam uel stipulam et multiplicia in palea tegimenta granorum, cum quibus tamen semina exsurgunt, ideo ait: Sed nudum granum hinc uolens ostendere, quia, si deus potest addere, quod non erat in nudo semine, multo magis potest reparare, quod erat in hominis corpore.

### English translation (Claude)

So look at this saying of the apostle from the beginning, and consider it whole. When he wished to persuade of the resurrection of the dead those who said that there is no resurrection of the dead, having first put forward the resurrection of Christ as an example, among the other things he set out there he raised a question for himself and said: “But someone will say, How do the dead rise? And with what body do they come?” that is, with what kind of body. Then, bringing in the proofs of seeds, he says: “Foolish one, what you sow is not brought to life unless it dies; and what you sow is not the body that is to be, but a bare grain, perhaps of wheat or of some other kind; but God gives it a body as he wills, and to each of the seeds its own body.” In this sense, then, he had said, “You do not sow the body that is to be.” For it is not that wheat will not come from wheat; but since no one sows the blade or the stalk or the many coverings of the grains in the chaff, with which the seeds nonetheless rise up, he says “but a bare grain,” wishing to show by this that, if God can add what was not in the bare seed, much more can he restore what was in the human body.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:35–38: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:12, 35–38.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.6 (CSEL 57:327–328; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-6).

## Letter 205.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-7
- Source: CSEL 57:328–329
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets Paul's comparisons of flesh and heavenly bodies as showing that the risen will differ in glory according to their merits.

### Latin text

Iam uero, quod adiungit, ad differentiam pertinet resurgentium propter diuersas glorias fidelium atque sanctorum. non omnis, inquit, caro eadem caro, alia quidem hominum alia autem caro pecorum alia uolucrum alia piscium. et corpora caelestia et corpora terrestria; sed alia est caelestium gloria et alia terrestrium. et alia gloria solis et alia gloria lunae et alia gloria stellarum; stella enim ab stella differt in gloria. sic et resurrectio mortuorum. in his omnibus iste sensus est: si genera carnis, cum sint cuncta mortalia, differunt tamen inter se pro diuersitatibus animantium et si corpora, cum sint omnia uisibilia, differunt tamen pro diuersitatibus locorum, unde alia est caelestium gloria alia terrestrium, et si in locis sublimibus, cum sint cuncta caelestia, differunt etiam ipsa claritatibus luminum, non mirum est, quod in resurrectione mortuorum distabit gloria meritorum.

### English translation (Claude)

And what he adds concerns the difference among those who rise, because of the different glories of the faithful and the saints. “Not all flesh,” he says, “is the same flesh, but there is one flesh of men, another of cattle, another of birds, another of fish. There are also heavenly bodies and earthly bodies; but the glory of the heavenly is one, and that of the earthly another. There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead.” In all these the sense is this: if the kinds of flesh, though all are mortal, nevertheless differ among themselves according to the diversity of living things; and if bodies, though all are visible, nevertheless differ according to the diversity of their places, so that the glory of the heavenly is one and that of the earthly another; and if in the lofty places, though all are heavenly, they too differ in the brightness of their lights; it is no wonder that in the resurrection of the dead the glory of merits will differ.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:39–42: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:39–42.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.7 (CSEL 57:328–329; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-7).

## Letter 205.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-8
- Source: CSEL 57:329–330
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that since believers will rise incorruptible, glorious, powerful, and spiritual, Christ's own risen body cannot be less.

### Latin text

Hinc iam uenit ad illud, quod communiter habet omnis caro, quae ad uitam resurgit aeternam, et dicit: Seminatur in corruptione, surget in incorruptione; seminatur in contumelia, surget in gloria; seminatur in infirmitate, surget in uirtute; seminatur corpus animale, surget corpus spiritale. in his uerbis apostoli numquid fas est putare melius corpora nostra resurrectura quam Christi, cum de illo sit propositum exemplum, quod fideliter intendere et per eius gratiam sperare debeamus? ac per hoc nullo modo potuit corpus Christi cum corruptione resurgere, si nostrum in incorruptione resurrecturum promittitur, nec potuit illud sine gloria, si nostrum resurget in gloria: quae autem gloria, ubi adhuc corruptio? nimis itaque absurdum est, ut credamus illud corpus et in infirmitate seminatum esse, id est mortificatum et in infirmitate resurrexisse, cum corpus nostrum seminetur in infirmitate, resurgat in uirtute et dicat idem apostolus de Christo: Etsi crucifixus est ex infirmitate, sed uiuit in uirtute dei. quis uero tam absurde sapiat, ut credat illud corpus animale seminatum, animale resuscitatum, si nostrum seminatur animale, surget spiritale?

### English translation (Claude)

From here he comes to what all flesh that rises to eternal life has in common, and says: “It is sown in corruption, it will rise in incorruption; it is sown in dishonor, it will rise in glory; it is sown in weakness, it will rise in power; it is sown an animal body, it will rise a spiritual body.” In these words of the apostle, is it right to think that our bodies will rise better than Christ's, when the example set before us is from him, to which we ought faithfully to look and for which we ought to hope through his grace? And so the body of Christ could in no way have risen with corruption, if ours is promised to rise in incorruption; nor could it have risen without glory, if ours will rise in glory; and what glory is there where there is still corruption? It is therefore quite absurd for us to believe that that body was both sown in weakness, that is, put to death, and rose in weakness, when our body is sown in weakness and rises in power, and the same apostle says of Christ, “Though he was crucified out of weakness, yet he lives by the power of God.” And who would think so absurdly as to believe that that body was sown animal and raised animal, if ours is sown animal and will rise spiritual?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:42–44: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 13:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:42–44; 2 Cor 13:4. “Animal body” renders corpus animale (Greek psychikon), the body animated by the soul, as distinct from the “spiritual body”.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.8 (CSEL 57:329–330; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-8).

## Letter 205.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-9
- Source: CSEL 57:330–331
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that Christ's body, once mortal and taken from Adam, is now incorruptible, glorious, and spiritual, and explains the difference between an animal and a spiritual body.

### Latin text

Constat itaque neque ullo modo dubitandum est corpus Christi, quod, licet corruptionem putredinis in sepulcro non uiderit, unde scriptum est: Nec dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem, clauis tamen et lancea perrumpi potuit, nunc omnino in incorruptione consistere et, quod in contumelia passionis mortisque seminatum est, nunc esse in gloria uitae aeternae et, quod ex infirmitate potuit crucifigi, nunc in uirtute regnare et, quod erat corpus animale, quoniam ex Adam sumptum est, nunc esse spiritale, quoniam spiritui iam inseparabiliter copulatum est. cum enim uellet apostolus de corpore animali adhibere testimonium scripturarum, illud posuit, quod in Genesi legitur: Si est, inquit, corpus animale, est et spiritale; sic et scriptum est: Factus est primus Adam in animam uiuentem uel in animam uiuam. recolis certe, quem ad modum scriptum sit: Et insufflauit deus in faciem eius flatum uitae et factus est homo in animam uiuam. dictum est autem etiam de animalibus: Producat terra animam uiuam. intellegitur ergo corpus animale dici simile ceteris animalibus propter mortis dissolutionem et corruptionem, quae cotidie cibo reficitur et postea superata animantis compago dissoluitur, spiritale autem corpus. quod iam cum spiritu inmortale est.

### English translation (Claude)

It is agreed, then, and in no way to be doubted, that the body of Christ, which, although it did not see the corruption of decay in the tomb (whence it is written, “Nor will you let your Holy One see corruption”), could nevertheless be pierced by nails and a spear, now exists entirely in incorruption; and that what was sown in the dishonor of the passion and death is now in the glory of eternal life; and that what could be crucified out of weakness now reigns in power; and that what was an animal body, since it was taken from Adam, is now spiritual, since it is now inseparably joined to the spirit. For when the apostle wished to bring forward the testimony of the Scriptures about the animal body, he cited what we read in Genesis: “If there is an animal body,” he says, “there is also a spiritual one; so also it is written, The first Adam became a living soul,” or “a live soul.” You surely recall how it is written: “And God breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul.” And it was said also of the animals: “Let the earth bring forth the living soul.” So the animal body is understood to be so called because it is like the other animals in the dissolution and corruption of death; it is refreshed daily with food and afterward, when the living frame is overcome, it is dissolved; but the spiritual body is one that, together with the spirit, is now immortal.

### Scripture references

- Ps 16:10 (15:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 19:34: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:44–45: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 1:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 16:10 (Acts 2:27); John 19:34; 1 Cor 15:44–45; Gen 2:7; Gen 1:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.9 (CSEL 57:330–331; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-9).

## Letter 205.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-10
- Source: CSEL 57:331–332
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the view that the spiritual body becomes spirit, holding that Christ's risen flesh is a true body, and that Adam would have passed to a spiritual body without death had he not sinned.

### Latin text

Quamuis nonnulli arbitrentur tunc fieri corpus spiritale, cum iam et ipsum corpus mutatur in spiritum et, quod homo erat ex corpore et spiritu, utrumque ac totum spiritus erit, quasi dixerit apostolus: Seminatur corpus, surget spiritus. dixit autem: Seminatur corpus animale, surget corpus spiritale. proinde, sicut animale corpus non est anima sed corpus, ita et spiritale corpus non spiritum debemus putare sed corpus. quis porro audeat opinari uel Christi corpus non spiritale resurrexisse uel, si spiritale surrexit, non iam corpus fuisse sed spiritum, cum hanc opinionem discipulorum refellat, ubi, cum eum uidentes existimarent se spiritum uidere, ait: Palpate et uidete, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me uidetis habere? iam igitur illa caro spiritale erat corpus nec tamen spiritus erat sed corpus nulla ulterius morte ab anima resoluendum atque separandum sicut corpus animale, quale animatum est dei flatu, cum factus est homo in animam uiuam, etiam ipsum ex animali spiritale sine mortis interuentu futurum, nisi transgressio praecepti prius commisso peccato infligeret poenam, quam deus seruatae iustitiae daret coronam.

### English translation (Claude)

Some, however, think that the body becomes spiritual when the body itself is also changed into spirit, and what man was, of body and spirit, will be wholly and entirely spirit, as though the apostle had said, “It is sown a body, it will rise a spirit.” But he said, “It is sown an animal body, it will rise a spiritual body.” Accordingly, just as the animal body is not soul but body, so too we must think the spiritual body is not spirit but body. And who would dare to think either that Christ's body did not rise spiritual, or, if it rose spiritual, that it was no longer a body but a spirit, when he refutes this opinion of the disciples where, seeing him, they thought they were seeing a spirit, and he said, “Handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have”? So that flesh was already a spiritual body, and yet it was not spirit but body, never again to be loosed and separated from the soul by any death; just as the animal body, such as was animated by the breath of God when man became a living soul, would itself have become spiritual from animal without the intervention of death, had not the transgression of the commandment, sin having first been committed, inflicted a penalty before God gave the crown for righteousness kept.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:44: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:37–39: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:44; Luke 24:37–39; Gen 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.10 (CSEL 57:331–332; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-10).

## Letter 205.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-11
- Source: CSEL 57:332–333
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ took a mortal body to heal us by humility, and interprets the first and last Adam as the living soul and the life-giving spirit.

### Latin text

Unde dominus Christus per nos ad nos uenit, cum peccatores iustus inuenit, per stratum quodam modo humilitatis nostrae sed non cum morbo iniquitatis nostrae. nam per animale nobis, hoc est per mortale corpus apparuit, qui utique, si uoluisset, cum corpore inmortali primitus aduenisset. sed quia nos humilitate filii dei sanari oportebat, usque ad nostram infirmitatem descendit et fidei nostrae meritum ac praemium uirtute suae resurrectionis ostendit. ideo sequitur apostolus et dicit: Nouissimus Adam in spiritum uiuificantem. siue intellegatur primus Adam, qui de puluere ante formatus est, nouissimus autem Adam, qui de uirgine procreatus est, siue in unoquoque homine utrumque compleatur, ut primus Adam sit homo in corpore mortali, nouissimus Adam idem ipse in corpore inmortali, tamen inter animam uiuentem et spiritum uiuificantem hoc interesse uoluit, ut illic sit corpus animale hic spiritale. anima quippe in corpore animali uiuit quidem, sed non uiuificat usque ad auferendam corruptionem; in corpore uero spiritali, quoniam perfecte adhaerens domino unus spiritus est, sic uiuificat, ut spiritale corpus efficiat absumens omnem corruptionem, nullam metuens separationem.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence the Lord Christ came to us by way of us, when he, the righteous one, found us sinners: by the path, as it were, of our lowliness, but not with the disease of our iniquity. For he appeared to us through an animal, that is, a mortal, body, though he could certainly have come at first with an immortal body if he had wished. But since we had to be healed by the humility of the Son of God, he came down even to our weakness and showed the merit and reward of our faith by the power of his resurrection. Therefore the apostle continues and says: “The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” Whether the first Adam is understood as the one formed earlier from the dust and the last Adam as the one born of the Virgin, or whether both are fulfilled in each human being, so that the first Adam is man in a mortal body and the last Adam the same man in an immortal body, still he meant that between a living soul and a life-giving spirit there is this difference, that in the one case there is an animal body, in the other a spiritual one. For the soul in an animal body does indeed live, but does not give life to the point of taking away corruption; but in a spiritual body, since, cleaving perfectly to the Lord, it is one spirit, it so gives life as to make the body spiritual, consuming all corruption and fearing no separation.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:45: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:17: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:7–8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:45; 1 Cor 6:17; Phil 2:7–8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.11 (CSEL 57:332–333; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-11).

## Letter 205.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-12
- Source: CSEL 57:333–334
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets the earthly and heavenly man as mortals through Adam and immortals through Christ, who became mortal without changing his divine nature.

### Latin text

Proinde sequitur: Sed non prius, quod spiritale est, sed quod animale, postea spiritale. primus homo de terra terrenus, secundus homo de caelo caelestis. qualis terrenus, tales et terreni et, qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes. sicut portauimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imaginem eius, qui de caelo est. quid est: Qualis terrenus, tales et terreni nisi mortales ex mortali? et quid est: Qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes nisi inmortales per inmortalem? illud per Adam hoc per Christum. dominus enim ad hoc terrenus factus est, cum esset caelestis, ut eos, qui terreni erant faceret caelestes, hoc est ideo ex inmortali mortalis factus est adsumendo serui formam, non domini mutando naturam, ut eos, qui mortales erant, faceret inmortales impertiendo dominicam gratiam, non seruilem iniuriam retinendo.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly he continues: “But it is not the spiritual that is first but the animal, and afterward the spiritual. The first man was from the earth, earthly; the second man is from heaven, heavenly. As was the earthly, so are those who are earthly; and as is the heavenly, so are those who are heavenly. Just as we have borne the image of the earthly, let us also bear the image of him who is from heaven.” What does “As was the earthly, so are those who are earthly” mean, if not mortals from a mortal? And what does “As is the heavenly, so are those who are heavenly” mean, if not immortals through an immortal? The one through Adam, the other through Christ. For the Lord, though he was heavenly, became earthly for this purpose, that he might make heavenly those who were earthly; that is, from immortal he became mortal by taking the form of a servant, not by changing the nature of the Lord, so that he might make immortal those who were mortal by imparting the grace of the Lord, not by keeping the injury of the servant.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:46–49: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:46–49 (Augustine's text reads “let us bear”); Phil 2:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.12 (CSEL 57:333–334; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-12).

## Letter 205.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-13
- Source: CSEL 57:334
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that Paul's added phrase "nor will corruption possess incorruption" explains "flesh and blood" as mortal corruption.

### Latin text

Cum igitur de resurrectione corporis apostolus disputans doceret nostra corpora futura ex corruptibilibus incorruptibilia, ex contemptibilibus gloriosa, ex infirmis fortia, ex animalibus spiritalia, hoc est ex mortalibus inmortalia, subiecit, unde agitur, atque ait: Hoc enim dico, fratres, quia caro et sanguis regnum dei possidere non possunt. et ne quisquam putaret secundum substantiam carnis hoc apostolum definisse, aperuit, quid diceret, subiungendo: Neque corruptio incorruptionem possidebit, tamquam diceret: Quod dixi: Caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, ideo dixi, quia corruptio incorruptionem non possidebit). hoc ergo loco nomine carnis et sanguinis corruptionem mortalitatis intellegi uoluit.

### English translation (Claude)

So when the apostle, discussing the resurrection of the body, had taught that our bodies will become incorruptible from corruptible, glorious from contemptible, strong from weak, spiritual from animal, that is, immortal from mortal, he added the point at issue and said: “For this I say, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God.” And lest anyone should think that the apostle had defined this according to the substance of the flesh, he made clear what he meant by adding: “Nor will corruption possess incorruption,” as though he were saying: “When I said, ‘Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God,’ I said it because corruption will not possess incorruption.” In this place, then, he meant the corruption of mortality to be understood by the name of flesh and blood.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:50: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:50.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.13 (CSEL 57:334; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-13).

## Letter 205.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-14
- Source: CSEL 57:334–335
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that all will rise, but only the righteous will be changed into incorruption, while the wicked rise to everlasting torment.

### Latin text

Denique, tamquam ei diceretur: Quo modo caro erit et caro non erit? caro quippe erit, quoniam dominus post resurrectionem ait: Palpate et uidete, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me uidetis habere, caro autem non erit, quoniam caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, exponit, quid dixerit, adiciens: Ecce mysterium dico uobis; omnes quidem resurgemus - uel, sicut Graeci codices habent, omnes quidem dormiemus, non tamen omnes inmutabimur. hanc inmutationem utrum in deterius an in melius intellegi uoluerit, inferiora demonstrant. in atomo, inquit, hoc est in puncto temporis, quod diuidi non potest, in ictu oculi, hoc est in summa celeritate, in nouissima tuba, hoc est in nouissimo signo, quod dabitur, ut ista compleantur; canet enim tuba, inquit. et mortui resurgent incorrupti et nos commutabimur. ergo istam commutationem in melius sine dubitatione oportet intellegi, quia omnes et iusti et iniusti resurrecturi sunt sed, sicut dominus in euangelio loquitur, qui bene fecerunt, in resurrectionem uitae, qui male egerunt. in resurrectionem iudicii, iudicium appellans poenam sempiternam, sicut alio loco: Qui non credit, inquit, iam iudicatus est. proinde illi, qui ad iudicium resurrecturi sunt, non commutabuntur in illam incorruptelam, quae nec doloris corruptionem pati potest; illa namque fidelium est atque sanctorum, isti uero perpetua corruptione cruciabuntur, quia ignis eorum non extinguetur et uermis eorum non morietur.

### English translation (Claude)

Then, as though it were said to him, “How will there be flesh and not be flesh?” (for there will be flesh, since the Lord said after the resurrection, “Handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have”; but there will not be flesh, since flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God), he explains what he said, adding: “Behold, I tell you a mystery: we shall all rise” (or, as the Greek manuscripts have it, “we shall all sleep”), “but we shall not all be changed.” Whether he meant this change to be understood for the worse or for the better, what follows shows. “In an atom,” he says, that is, in a point of time that cannot be divided; “in the twinkling of an eye,” that is, with the utmost speed; “at the last trumpet,” that is, at the last signal that will be given for these things to be fulfilled; “for the trumpet will sound,” he says, “and the dead will rise incorrupt, and we shall be changed.” So this change must without doubt be understood as for the better, because all, both righteous and unrighteous, will rise, but, as the Lord says in the gospel, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment, calling eternal punishment “judgment,” as in another place he says, “He who does not believe is already judged.” Accordingly, those who will rise to judgment will not be changed into that incorruption which cannot suffer even the corruption of pain; for that belongs to the faithful and the saints, while these will be tormented with perpetual corruption, because their fire will not be quenched and their worm will not die.

### Scripture references

- Luke 24:39: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:51–52: quotation, high confidence
- John 5:29: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:18: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 66:24: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 9:48: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Luke 24:39; 1 Cor 15:50–52 (Augustine notes the Greek reading “we shall all sleep”); John 5:29; John 3:18; Isa 66:24 (Mark 9:48). A leaked apparatus note in the digital text is removed by a logged correction.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.14 (CSEL 57:334–335; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-14).

## Letter 205.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-15
- Source: CSEL 57:335–336
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that all will rise with whole bodies, but only the righteous will put on incorruption and immortality, while the wicked remain subject to the pain of punishment.

### Latin text

Quid sibi ergo uult ista distinctio: Et mortui resurgent incorrupti et nos commutabimur, nisi quia omnes incorrupti resurgent, sed ex his iusti etiam inmutabuntur in illam incorruptelam. cui omnino nulla possit nocere corruptio? ac per hoc, qui in eam non commutabuntur, incorrupti quidem resurgent integritate membrorum sed tamen corrumpendi dolore poenarum, cum audierint: Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis eius. a quo auditu malo iustus non timebit. de illa uero commutatione iustorum cum dixisset: Nos commutabimur, tamquam quaereremus, quo modo istud fiat uel qualis illa commutatio futura sit, adiungit et dicit: Oportet enim corruptibile hoc induere incorruptelam et mortale hoc induere inmortalitatem. non, ut opinor, dubitandum est secundum hoc dictum: Caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, quia non ibi erit corruptio et mortalitas carnis et sanguinis; secundum has enim qualitates hoc loco carnem et sanguinem nuncupauit.

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, does this distinction mean, “And the dead will rise incorrupt, and we shall be changed,” if not that all will rise incorrupt, but of these the righteous will also be changed into that incorruption which no corruption at all can harm? And so those who will not be changed into it will indeed rise incorrupt in the wholeness of their limbs, but still to be corrupted by the pain of punishments, when they hear, “Go into the eternal fire, which was prepared for the devil and his angels.” The righteous man will not fear this evil hearing. And as for that change of the righteous, when he had said, “We shall be changed,” as though we were asking how this would happen or what kind of change it would be, he adds and says: “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality.” In my opinion, it is not to be doubted that it is in this sense that it was said, “Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God,” because there will not be there the corruption and mortality of flesh and blood; for in this place he called flesh and blood by these qualities.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:52–53: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:41: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 112:7 (111:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:50: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 15:52–53; Matt 25:41; Ps 112:7; 1 Cor 15:50.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.15 (CSEL 57:335–336; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-15).

## Letter 205.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-16
- Source: CSEL 57:336–337
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine illustrates by the two senses of "temptation" how flesh in substance will inherit the kingdom while flesh as corruption will not.

### Latin text

Quocirca, ut aliquid exempli gratia ponam, quod interim occurrit, sicut scriptum est: Ne forte temptauerit uos, qui temptat, et inanis sit labor noster — atque hic intellegitur diabolus. tamquam deus omnino non temptet, de quo alio loco scriptura dicit: Ipse autem neminem temptat; nec contraria est ista sententia ei. qua dicitur: Temptat uos dominus deus uester, sed soluitur quaestio, cum uocabulum temptationis diuersas intellegentias habet eo quod alia sit temptatio deceptionis alia temptatio probationis: secundum illam non intellegitur, qui temptat, nisi diabolus. secundum hanc uero temptat deus —, ita, cum dicitur caro possidebit regnum dei et caro non possidebit regnum dei etiam huius nominis intellegentia discernatur et nulla erit quaestio. quoniam caro secundum substantiam, secundum quam dictum est: Spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me uidetis habere, possidet regnum dei, caro autem curo secundum corruptionem intellegitur, non possidebit; hoc enim expositum est, cum diceretur: Caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, in eo, quod continuo additum est: Neque corruptio incorruptionem possidebit, sicut satis, quantum arbitror. disseruimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, to give an example that occurs to me for the moment: as it is written, “Lest perhaps the tempter has tempted you and our labor be in vain,” and here the devil is understood, as though God does not tempt at all, of whom Scripture says in another place, “He himself tempts no one”; and yet this statement is not contrary to the one in which it is said, “The Lord your God tests you”; but the question is resolved, since the word “temptation” has different meanings, in that the temptation of deception is one thing and the temptation of testing another: in the former sense the tempter is understood to be none but the devil, but in the latter God tempts; so, when it is said, “Flesh will possess the kingdom of God,” and “Flesh will not possess the kingdom of God,” let the meaning of this word too be distinguished, and there will be no question. For flesh in its substance, in the sense in which it was said, “A spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have,” possesses the kingdom of God; but flesh understood in the sense of corruption will not possess it. For this was explained, when it was said, “Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God,” by what was immediately added: “Nor will corruption possess incorruption,” as we have, I think, sufficiently discussed.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:13: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 13:3: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:39: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:50: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Thess 3:5; Jas 1:13; Deut 13:3; Luke 24:39; 1 Cor 15:50. The word curo in the digital text (caro autem curo secundum corruptionem) appears to be a slip and is not translated.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.16 (CSEL 57:336–337; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-16).

## Letter 205.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-17
- Source: CSEL 57:337–338
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine affirms that God still forms each body individually, since he continues to work in governing creation, as Scripture shows.

### Latin text

Quod autem quaeris, utrum singillatim a creatore deo corporum liniamenta formentur, non te mouebit, si, quantum potest humana mens, potentiam diuinae operationis intellegas. quo modo enim negare poterimus deum etiam nunc operari cuncta, quae creantur, cum dominus dicat: Pater meus usque nunc operatur? unde illa cessatio septimi diei ab ipsis naturis condendis intellegenda est facta, non ab earum administratione, quae conditae referuntur. cum ergo natura rerum a creatore administratur et per ordines praefinitis locis et temporibus suis cuncta nascuntur, deus usque nunc operatur. nam si deus nunc ista non format, quo modo legitur: Priusquam te formarem in utero, noui te? quo modo etiam accipi potest: Quod si faenum agri, quod hodie est et cras in clibanum mittitur, deus sic uestit? nisi forte credendum est faenum a deo uestiri et a deo corpora non formari. cum enim dixit uestit, non de praeterita ordinatione sed de praesenti operatione satis indicat. unde est etiam illud apostoli de seminibus, quod supra commemoraui: Non, inquit, corpus, quod futurum est, seminas sed nudum granum fere tritici aut alicuius ceterorum; deus autem illi dat corpus, quo modo uoluerit. non dixit (dedit) aut disposuit sed dat, ut creatorem intellegas efficaciam sapientiae suae rebus, quae cotidie suis temporibus oriuntur. condendis adhibere. de qua sapientia dictum est: Pertendit a fine usque in finem fortiter et - non dixit disposuit sed — disponit omnia suauiter. multum est autem uel tenuiter sapere, quo modo commutabilia et temporalia non commutabilibus et temporalibus creatoris motibus sed aeterna et stabili uirtute condantur.

### English translation (Claude)

As to your question whether the features of bodies are formed individually by God the Creator, it will not trouble you if you understand, as far as the human mind can, the power of the divine working. For how could we deny that God works even now all the things that are created, when the Lord says, “My Father is working until now”? Hence the rest of the seventh day must be understood as a rest from creating natures themselves, not from governing those that are recorded as created. So since the nature of things is governed by the Creator, and all things are born in their orders, in their predetermined places and times, God is working until now. For if God does not now form these things, how do we read, “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you”? How also can this be taken: “If God so clothes the grass of the field, which is today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven”? Unless perhaps it is to be believed that grass is clothed by God and bodies are not formed by God! For when he said “clothes,” he indicates clearly enough that he speaks not of a past ordering but of a present working. Hence also that saying of the apostle about seeds which I mentioned above: “You do not sow the body that is to be,” he says, “but a bare grain, perhaps of wheat or of some other kind; but God gives it a body as he wills.” He did not say “gave” or “arranged,” but “gives,” so that you may understand that the Creator applies the efficacy of his wisdom to creating the things that arise daily in their own times. Of this wisdom it was said, “It reaches mightily from end to end and” (he did not say “arranged,” but) “arranges all things sweetly.” But it is a great thing to understand even slightly how changeable and temporal things are created not by changeable and temporal movements of the Creator but by an eternal and stable power.

### Scripture references

- John 5:17: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 2:2: allusion, high confidence
- Jer 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:30: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:37–38: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 5:17; Gen 2:2; Jer 1:5; Matt 6:30; 1 Cor 15:37–38; Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon is outside the 66 books).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.17 (CSEL 57:337–338; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-17).

## Letter 205.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-18
- Source: CSEL 57:338–339
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refers Consentius to his book on whether baptized persons dying unrepentant in grave sin will eventually be pardoned.

### Latin text

De illo sane. quod percontandum putasti, utrum baptizati omnes, si absque paenitentia diuersis criminibus inretiti de corpore exierint, ueniam quolibet tempore consecuturi sint, librum non paruae quantitatis iam scripsi, quem si describere curaueris, fortasse nihil ulterius hinc requires.

### English translation (Claude)

As for what you thought should be asked, whether all the baptized, if they leave the body entangled in various crimes without repentance, will obtain pardon at some time, I have already written a book of no small size; if you take care to have it copied, perhaps you will need to ask nothing further on this.

### Translation notes

- The book is On Faith and Works (De fide et operibus).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.18 (CSEL 57:338–339; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-18).

## Letter 205.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-19
- Source: CSEL 57:339–340
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers that the breath God breathed into Adam either is the soul or made it, but in either case the soul is created and not part of God's substance.

### Latin text

Vis etiam per me scire, utrum dei flatus ille in Adam idem Ipse sit anima. breuiter respondeo: aut ipse est aut ipso anima facta est. sed et si ipse est, factus est. de anima quippe loquitur per Esaiam prophetam deus, ubi dicit: Omnem flatum ego feci, quod sequentia satis indicant; sequitur enim: Propter peccatum modicum quid contristaui illum, id est ipsum flatum, et cetera, quae nisi de anima humana intellegi nequeunt. in hac enim quaestione maxime cauendum est, ne anima non a deo facta natura sed ipsius dei substantia tamquam unigenitus filius, quod est uerbum eius, aut aliqua eius particula esse credatur, tamquam illa natura atque substantia, qua deus est, quicquid est, commutabilis esse possit, quod esse animam nemo non sentit, qui se habere animam sentit. Cum ista dictarem, perlator iam uentum expectans me uehementer, ut nauigaret, urguebat. itaque, si quid hic incondite atque inculte dictum legeris uel si totum ita esse perspexeris, doctrinae da operam, linguae ueniam.

### English translation (Claude)

You also wish to learn from me whether that breath of God in Adam is itself the soul. I answer briefly: either it is the soul, or the soul was made from it. But even if it is the soul, it was made. For God speaks of the soul through the prophet Isaiah, where he says, “I have made every breath,” as what follows shows clearly enough; for it continues, “Because of sin I grieved him a little,” that is, that very breath, and the rest, which can only be understood of the human soul. For in this question one must above all beware lest the soul be believed to be not a nature made by God but the very substance of God, like the only-begotten Son, who is his Word, or some particle of him; as though that nature and substance by which God is whatever he is could be changeable, which the soul is, as everyone perceives who perceives that he has a soul. While I was dictating this, the bearer, already waiting for the wind, was pressing me hard so that he might sail. So, if you read anything here said without order or polish, or if you perceive the whole to be so, attend to the teaching and pardon the language.

### Scripture references

- Gen 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- Isa 57:16–17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gen 2:7; Isa 57:16–17 (LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 205.19 (CSEL 57:339–340; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-205-19).

## Letter 206.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-206-1
- Source: CSEL 57:340–341
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends Bishop Felix to Count Valerius and asks him to help him.

### Latin text

Quotienscumque a me petunt homines, ut eos tuae benignitati fideique commendem, si non facio, non mihi recte uideor de tua uel erga opis indigos misericordia uel erga nos beniuolentia iudicare. itaque facio et maxime ministros Christi, qui ecclesiae curam gerunt, cuius te coheredem et filium esse gaudemus, tuae praestantiae commendare non dubito, domine merito inlustris et praestantissime atque in Christo carissime fili. sanctus itaque frater et coepiscopus meus Felix cum hoc me rogasset, utique negare non debui. commendo ergo tibi episcopum Christi egentem auxilio uiri sublimis; fac ergo, quod potes, quoniam tibi plurimum posse praestitit dominus, cuius te lucrorum auidissimum nouimus.

### English translation (Claude)

Whenever people ask me to commend them to your kindness and good faith, if I do not do it, I do not seem to myself to judge rightly either of your mercy toward those in need of help or of your goodwill toward us. So I do it, and above all I do not hesitate to commend to Your Eminence ministers of Christ who bear the care of the Church, whose co-heir and son we rejoice that you are, my justly illustrious and most eminent lord and son most dear in Christ. So when my holy brother and fellow bishop Felix asked me for this, I certainly ought not to refuse. I commend to you, then, a bishop of Christ who needs the help of a man of high rank; do what you can, then, since the Lord, whose gain we know you are most eager for, has granted you to be able to do a great deal.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Count Valerius, as Letter 200.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 206.1 (CSEL 57:340–341; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-206-1).

## Letter 207.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-207-1
- Source: CSEL 57:341–342
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Bishop Claudius his reply to Julian of Eclanum's four books, explaining that his earlier answer had relied on inaccurate extracts.

### Latin text

Quoniam mihi fraterno excitatus affectu Iuliani quattuor libros, quos aduersus unum meum scripsit, priusquam peterem, ipse misisti, nihil conuenientius putaui esse faciendum, quam ut ea, quae respondeo, tu potissimum legens iudices, utrum recte congruenterque responderim. nam de his quattuor libris nonnulla decerpta scripserat nescio quis ad inlustrem et religiosum uirum comitem Valerium aduersus eundem librum meum, quem me ad illum scripsisse cognouerat. quae cum in manus meas eodem sublimi uiro curante uenissent, illi primo non distuli secundum uolumen adiungere, in quo illa omnia, sicut potui, refutaui. sed nunc eosdem libros cum diligentius inspicerem, comperi illum, qui nonnulla inde selegerat, non omnia ita posuisse, ut in his libris legitur. unde poterit uideri Iuliano uel cuilibet illorum me potius fuisse mentitum, quia utique non sicut hi quattuor libri ita illa, quae de his excerpta et memorato comiti missa sunt. innotescere potuerunt. quisquis ergo et illum secundum librum meum ad comitem identidem Valerium sicut primum conscriptum legit, nouerit me in quibusdam non respondisse Iuliano sed ei potius. qui de libris eius illa selegit et non ita posuit, ut inuenit, sed aliquantum putauit esse mutanda, fortasse ut eo modo quasi sua faceret, quae aliena esse constaret. nunc autem ueriora credens exemplaria. quae tua sanctitas misit, ipsi auctori uideo respondendum, qui unum meum quattuor libris suis refellisse se iactat et usquequaque spargere fidei uenena non cessat. adgressus sum igitur hoc opus in adiutorio saluatoris pusillorum atque magnorum et scio te, ut id implerem, orasse pro me et pro his, quibus huiusce modi labores nostros profuturos credimus et optamus. adtende ergo iam responsionem meam, cuius principium hanc epistulam subsequetur. ualeas in domino memor nostri. frater beatissime.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, moved by brotherly affection, you yourself sent me, before I asked, the four books of Julian that he wrote against one of mine, I thought nothing more fitting could be done than that you above all should read my reply and judge whether I have answered rightly and fittingly. For someone or other had written certain extracts from these four books to the illustrious and religious man, Count Valerius, against that same book of mine, which he had learned I wrote to him. When these came into my hands through the care of the same eminent man, I did not delay to add a second volume for him to the first, in which I refuted all those things as best I could. But now, on examining those same books more carefully, I found that the man who had selected certain passages from them had not set everything down as it reads in those books. Hence it could seem to Julian, or to any of them, that it was rather I who had lied, since the extracts taken from these four books and sent to the count I mentioned could certainly not become known in the same way as the four books themselves. So whoever reads that second book of mine, written likewise to Count Valerius as the first was, should know that in some points I answered not Julian but rather the man who selected those passages from his books and did not set them down as he found them, but thought something should be changed, perhaps so as to make his own in this way what was agreed to be another's. But now, trusting the copies that Your Holiness sent as more accurate, I see that I must answer the author himself, who boasts that he has refuted one book of mine with his four, and does not cease to scatter the poisons of faith everywhere. So I have undertaken this work with the help of the Savior of small and great, and I know that you have prayed for me that I might complete it, and for those whom we believe and hope our labors of this kind will benefit. Attend, then, to my reply, the beginning of which will follow this letter. Farewell in the Lord, and remember us, most blessed brother.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Claudius, a bishop. The reply is Against Julian (Contra Iulianum); the earlier work is On Marriage and Concupiscence, Book 2, written to Valerius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 207.1 (CSEL 57:341–342; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/205-1/#p-207-1).

## Letter 208.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-1
- Source: CSEL 57:342–343
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to console and exhort Felicia, a consecrated virgin troubled by scandals in the Church.

### Latin text

Non dubito animum tuum et pro tua fide et pro aliorum infirmitate uel iniquitate turbatum, cum sanctus apostolus plenus uisceribus caritatis confiteatur et dicat: Quis infirmatur et ego non infirmor? quis scandalizatur et ego non uror? unde etiam ego ipse compunctus et pro tua, quae in Christo est, salute sollicitus has uel consolatorias uel exhortatorias litteras ad tuam sanctitatem dandas putaui quoniam in domini nostri Iesu Christi corpore, quod est ecclesia eius et unitas membrorum eius, germanissima nobis facta es, quae tamquam honorabile membrum in eius compage diligeris et nobiscum illius sancto spiritu uiuis.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not doubt that your mind is troubled, both for your own faith and for the weakness or wickedness of others, since the holy apostle, full of the heart of love, confesses and says: “Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?” Hence I too, stung and anxious for your salvation in Christ, thought this letter of consolation or exhortation should be sent to Your Holiness, since in the body of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is his Church and the unity of his members, you have become most truly a sister to us, you who are loved as an honorable member in its frame and live with us by his Holy Spirit.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Felicia, a virgin who had recently come over from the Donatists. 2 Cor 11:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.1 (CSEL 57:342–343; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-1).

## Letter 208.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-2
- Source: CSEL 57:343–344
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that both good and self-seeking pastors will exist in the Church until the end, as Christ foretold, and that one must persevere.

### Latin text

Unde te admoneo, ne grauius perturberis his scandalis, quae ideo uentura praedicta sunt, ut, quando uenirent, reminisceremur esse praedicta et non eis ualde commoueremur. nam haec ipse dominus in euangelio ita praedixit: Vae mundo ab scandalis! oportet uenire scandala; uae autem illi homini, per quem scandalum uenit! qui sunt ipsi homines. nisi de quibus dicit apostolus: Sua quaerentes, non quae Iesu Christi? alii sunt ergo, qui propterea tenent pastorales cathedras, ut Christi gregibus consulant: alii uero, qui propterea in eis sedent, ut suis honoribus temporalibus et commodis saecularibus gaudeant. ista duo genera pastorum aliis morientibus aliis nascentibus in ipsa catholica necesse est usque ad finem saeculi et usque ad domini iudicium perseuerent. si enim temporibus apostolorum fuerunt tales, inter quos falsos fratres apostolus gemeret et diceret: Periculis in falsis fratribus nec eos per superbiam separaret, sed per tolerantiam sustineret, quanto magis temporibus nostris necesse est, ut sint, cum de tempore huius saeculi, quod propinquat ad finem, apertissime dominus dicat: Quoniam abundauit iniquitas. refrigescet caritas multorum! sed. quod sequitur, nos debet consolari et exhortari: Qui perseuerauerit, inquit, usque in finem, hic saluus erit.

### English translation (Claude)

So I warn you not to be too gravely disturbed by these scandals, which were foretold as coming for this reason, that when they came we might remember that they had been foretold and not be greatly shaken by them. For the Lord himself foretold them in the gospel thus: “Woe to the world because of scandals! Scandals must come; but woe to that man through whom the scandal comes!” Who are these men, if not those of whom the apostle says, “Seeking their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ”? There are some, then, who hold pastoral chairs in order to care for Christ's flocks; but others who sit in them in order to enjoy their temporal honors and worldly advantages. These two kinds of pastors, some dying and others being born, must continue in the Catholic Church itself until the end of the age and until the Lord's judgment. For if in the times of the apostles there were such men, among whom the apostle groaned at false brothers and said, “In dangers among false brothers,” and did not separate them from himself by pride but bore with them by patience, how much more must there be such in our times, when of the time of this age, which is drawing near to the end, the Lord says most plainly: “Because iniquity has abounded, the love of many will grow cold!” But what follows ought to console and exhort us: “He who perseveres to the end,” he says, “will be saved.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 18:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:26: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 24:12–13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 18:7; Phil 2:21; 2 Cor 11:26; Matt 24:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.2 (CSEL 57:343–344; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-2).

## Letter 208.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-3
- Source: CSEL 57:344
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says good and bad are mixed in the Church's flock until Christ separates them, and that the Donatists, by separating early, cut themselves off from unity.

### Latin text

Sicut autem sunt pastores boni et mali. sic etiam in ipsis gregibus sunt et boni et mali. boni ouium nomine significantur, mali uero haedi appellantur. sed commixti pariter pascunt, donec ueniat princeps pastorum, qui dictus est unus pastor, et. quem ad modum ipse promisit, separet sicut pastor oues ab haedis. nobis enim imperauit congregationem, sibi autem seruauit separationem. quia ille debet separare, qui nescit errare. nam qui separare ante tempus, quod sibi dominus seruauit, superbi serui facile ausi sunt, ipsi potius ab unitate catholica separati sunt; nam schismate inmundi mundum gregem habere unde potuerunt?

### English translation (Claude)

And just as there are good and bad pastors, so in the flocks themselves too there are both good and bad. The good are signified by the name of sheep, while the bad are called goats. But they graze mixed together until the chief of pastors comes, who is called the one shepherd, and, as he himself promised, separates them as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. For he commanded us to gather, but kept the separation for himself, because he who cannot err ought to do the separating. For those proud servants who rashly dared to separate before the time that the Lord kept for himself have rather been separated themselves from Catholic unity; for how could they, unclean by schism, have a clean flock?

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 5:4: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Pet 5:4; John 10:16; Matt 25:32. The “proud servants” are the Donatists.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.3 (CSEL 57:344; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-3).

## Letter 208.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-4
- Source: CSEL 57:344
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begins to explain how Christ teaches believers to regard good and bad pastors without leaving the Church's unity.

### Latin text

Ut ergo in unitate maneamus nec offensi scandalis palearum aream dominicam deseramus, sed potius usque in finem uentilationis frumenta perseueremus et comminutam stipulam firmo caritatis pondere toleremus, ipse pastor noster in euangelio de pastoribus bonis nos admonet, ut propter bona opera eorum nec in eis ipsis nostram spem ponamus, sed eum, qui illos tales fecit, patrem, qui in caelis est, glorificemus et de pastoribus malis, quos nomine scribarum et Pharisaeorum significare uoluit docentes bona et facientes mala;

### English translation (Claude)

So, that we may remain in unity and not desert the Lord's threshing floor offended by the scandals of the chaff, but may rather persevere as wheat until the end of the winnowing and bear the crushed straw by the firm weight of love, our shepherd himself in the gospel admonishes us concerning good pastors, that we should not, because of their good works, place our hope even in them, but glorify the Father in heaven who made them such; and concerning bad pastors, whom he chose to signify by the name of scribes and Pharisees, teaching good and doing evil;

### Scripture references

- Matt 3:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 3:12; the sentence continues in 208.5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.4 (CSEL 57:344; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-4).

## Letter 208.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-5
- Source: CSEL 57:344–346
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ's sheep hear his voice even through bad pastors, doing what they teach but not what they do, and imitate good pastors without placing their hope in them.

### Latin text

nam de bonis pastoribus ita loquitur: Vos estis lumen mundi. non potest ciuitas abscondi super montem constituta neque accendunt lucernam et ponunt eam sub modio sed super candelabrum, ut luceat omnibus, qui in domo sunt. sic luceat lumen uestrum coram hominibus. ut uideant opera uestra et glorificent patrem uestrum. qui in caelis est. de malis autem pastoribus oues admonet dicens: Super cathedram Moysi sedent. quae dicunt, facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite; dicunt enim et non faciunt. his auditis oues Christi etiam per malos doctores uocem ipsius audiunt et unitatem illius non relinquunt, quia bonum, quod eos audiunt dicere. non est ipsorum sed illius; et ideo secure oues pascuntur. quia et sub malis pastoribus pascuis dominicis nutriuntur. non autem faciunt malorum facta pastorum, quia talia opera non sunt illius sed ipsorum. quos autem bonos uident, non solum audiunt bona, quae dicunt, sed etiam imitantur bona, quae faciunt. de talibus erat apostolus, qui dicebat: Imitatores mei estote sicut et ego Christi. iste lumen erat inluminatum a lumine sempiterno, ipso domino Iesu Christo. et in candelabro positum erat, quia in eius cruce gloriabatur. unde ait: Mihi autem absit gloriari nisi. in cruce domini nostri Iesu Christi. et quia non sua quaerebat, sed quae Iesu Christi, quamuis ad imitationem suam. quos per euangelium genuerat, hortatur, tamen grauiter corripit eos, qui per apostolorum nomina schismata fecerunt, et obiurgat illos, qui dicebant: Ego sum Pauli; numquid Paulus, inquit, crucifixus est pro uobis aut in nomine Pauli baptizati estis?

### English translation (Claude)

for of good pastors he speaks thus: “You are the light of the world. A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden; nor do they light a lamp and put it under a bushel, but on a lampstand, so that it gives light to all who are in the house. So let your light shine before men, that they may see your works and glorify your Father who is in heaven.” But concerning bad pastors he warns the sheep, saying: “They sit on the chair of Moses. Do what they say, but do not do what they do; for they say and do not do.” Having heard this, the sheep of Christ hear his voice even through bad teachers and do not leave his unity, because the good they hear them say is not theirs but his; and so the sheep graze safely, because even under bad pastors they are fed in the Lord's pastures. But they do not do the deeds of the bad pastors, because such works are not his but theirs. But those whom they see to be good they not only hear in the good things they say but also imitate in the good things they do. Of such was the apostle who said, “Be imitators of me, as I also am of Christ.” He was a light lit by the everlasting light, the Lord Jesus Christ himself, and set on a lampstand, because he gloried in his cross; hence he says, “But far be it from me to glory except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.” And because he sought not his own interests but those of Jesus Christ, although he urges those whom he had begotten through the gospel to imitate him, he nevertheless sharply rebukes those who made schisms by the names of the apostles, and chides those who said, “I am of Paul.” “Was Paul crucified for you,” he says, “or were you baptized in the name of Paul?”

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:14–16: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:2–3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:1: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 6:14: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:15: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 1:12–13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:14–16; Matt 23:2–3; 1 Cor 11:1; Gal 6:14; Phil 2:21; 1 Cor 4:15; 1 Cor 1:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.5 (CSEL 57:344–346; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-5).

## Letter 208.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-6
- Source: CSEL 57:346
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine teaches that good sheep place their hope in Christ, not in pastors, and that the Catholic Church spread through the world contains good and bad, while those separated from it cannot be good.

### Latin text

Hinc intellegimus et bonos pastores non sua quaerentes, sed quae Iesu Christi, et bonas oues, quamuis imitentur facta pastorum bonorum, tamen in eis non ponere spem suam, quorum ministerio sunt congregatae, sed in domino potius. cuius sanguine sunt redemptae, ut. quando forte incurrerint in pastores malos doctrinam illius praedicantes et sua mala opera facientes, quae dicunt, faciant, quae autem faciunt, non faciant nec propter filios iniquitatis pascua deserant unitatis. in catholica enim ecclesia, quae non in sola Africa sicut pars Donati sed per omnes gentes, sicut promissa est. dilatatur atque diffunditur in uniuerso mundo, sicut dicit apostolus, fructificans et crescens, et boni sunt et mali. ab ea uero separati, quam diu contra illam sentiunt, boni esse non possunt, quia. etsi aliquos eorum bonos uidetur ostendere quasi laudabilis conuersatio, malos eos facit ipsa diuisio dicente domino: Qui mecum non est, aduersum me est et, qui mecum non colligit, spargit.

### English translation (Claude)

From this we understand that good pastors seek not their own interests but those of Jesus Christ, and that good sheep, although they imitate the deeds of good pastors, nevertheless do not place their hope in those by whose ministry they were gathered, but rather in the Lord by whose blood they were redeemed; so that, when they happen to come upon bad pastors who preach his teaching and do their own evil works, they do what they say but do not do what they do, nor do they desert the pastures of unity because of the children of iniquity. For in the Catholic Church, which is not, like the party of Donatus, in Africa alone, but is spread and extended through all nations, as was promised, in the whole world, as the apostle says, bearing fruit and growing, there are both good and bad. But those separated from it, so long as they think against it, cannot be good, because, even if a seemingly praiseworthy way of life appears to show some of them to be good, the division itself makes them bad, as the Lord says: “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.”

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 23:3: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:6: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 12:30: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 2:21; Matt 23:3; Col 1:6; Matt 12:30. Augustine's judgment on those outside the Church is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.6 (CSEL 57:346; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-6).

## Letter 208.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-7
- Source: CSEL 57:346–347
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Felicia to hold fast to the Church, since her virginity would have profited nothing outside its unity, and to place her hope in Christ who compelled her to come in.

### Latin text

Unde et exhortor, domina merito suscipienda et in Christi membris honoranda filia, ut, quod tibi dominus praestitit, fideliter teneas eumque toto corde diligas et eius ecclesiam. qui te non permisit uirginitatis tuae fructum cum perditis perdere uel perire. si enim de isto saeculo exires separata ab unitate corporis Christi. nihil tibi prodesset seruata integritas corporis tui. sed deus, qui diues est in misericordia, fecit iuxta te, quod in euangelio scriptum est; cum excusarent inuitati ad cenam patris familias. inter cetera dixit seruis suis: Exite in uias et saepes et. quoscumque inueneritis, cogite intrare. tu ergo quamuis dilectionem sincerissimam debeas etiam bonis seruis eius. per quorum ministerium intrare coacta es, in illo tamen debes spem ponere, qui conuiuium praeparauit, cui et tu ad uitam aeternam beatamque sollicita es. ei quippe commendans cor tuum et propositum tuum et sanctam uirginitatem tuam et fidem et spem et caritatem tuam non moueberis scandalis, quae abundabunt usque in finem, sed stabili robore pietatis salua eris atque in domino gloriosa in eius unitate perseuerando usque in finem. quo modo autem hanc acceperis pro te sollicitudinem meam, quam, quibus potui, litteris tibi insinuare curaui, fac, ut nouerim rescriptis tuis. dei misericordia et gratia te semper protegat.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence I also exhort you, my lady, justly to be welcomed, and daughter to be honored among the members of Christ, to hold faithfully what the Lord has granted you, and to love with your whole heart him and his Church, who did not allow you to lose the fruit of your virginity with the lost, or to perish. For if you were to leave this world separated from the unity of the body of Christ, the integrity of your body preserved would profit you nothing. But God, who is rich in mercy, did in your case what is written in the gospel: when those invited to the householder's supper made excuses, among other things he said to his servants, “Go out into the roads and hedges, and whomever you find, compel them to come in.” So, although you owe the most sincere love also to his good servants, by whose ministry you were compelled to come in, you must nevertheless place your hope in him who prepared the banquet, by whom you too have been made eager for eternal and blessed life. For commending to him your heart and your purpose, your holy virginity, your faith, hope, and love, you will not be shaken by the scandals that will abound until the end, but by the stable strength of godliness you will be saved and glorious in the Lord, persevering in his unity to the end. And let me know by your reply how you have received this concern of mine for you, which I have taken care to convey to you in such a letter as I could. May God's mercy and grace always protect you.

### Scripture references

- Eph 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:18: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 14:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:13: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 24:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 2:4; Luke 14:18, 23 (“compel them to come in”, which Augustine applies to bringing Donatists into the Church; translated as written); 1 Cor 13:13; Matt 24:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 208.7 (CSEL 57:346–347; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-208-7).

## Letter 209.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-1
- Source: CSEL 57:347–348
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine congratulates Pope Celestine on his peaceful election and asks his help in a crisis Augustine himself caused.

### Latin text

Primum gratulationem reddo meritis tuis, quod te in illa sede dominus deus noster sine ulla, sicut audiuimus, plebis suae discissione constituit. deinde insinuo sanctitati tuae, quae sint circa nos, ut non solum orando pro nobis uerum etiam consulendo et opitulando subuenias. in magna quippe tribulatione positus haec ad tuam beatitudinem scripta direxi. quoniam nolens prodesse quibusdam in nostra uicinitate membris Christi magnam illis cladem inprouidus et incautus ingessi.

### English translation (Claude)

First, I offer my congratulations on your merits, that the Lord our God has set you in that see without any division of his people, as we have heard. Next, I make known to Your Holiness what is happening around us, so that you may help us not only by praying for us but also by advising and assisting us. For I have sent this letter to Your Blessedness in great tribulation, because, in wishing to benefit some members of Christ in our neighborhood, I brought a great disaster upon them through lack of foresight and caution.

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Celestine I, bishop of Rome from 422.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.1 (CSEL 57:347–348; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-1).

## Letter 209.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-2
- Source: CSEL 57:348
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains how Fussala, a former Donatist town forty miles from Hippo, was won to unity at great cost, and why he arranged for it to have its own bishop.

### Latin text

Fussala dicitur Hipponiensi territorio confine castellum. antea ibi numquam episcopus fuit, sed simul cum contigua sibi regione ad parochiam Hipponiensis ecclesiae pertinebat. paucos habebat illa terra catholicos; ceteras plebes illic in magna multitudine hominum constitutas Donatistarum error miserabiliter obtinebat ita, ut in eodem castello nullus esset omnino catholicus. actum est in dei misericordia. ut omnia ipsa loca unitati ecclesiae cohaererent; per quantos labores et pericula nostra, longum est explicare, ita ut ibi presbyteri, qui eis congregandis a nobis primitus constituti sunt. expoliarentur, caederentur, debilitarentur, excaecarentur, occiderentur. quorum tamen passiones inutiles ac steriles non fuerunt unitatis illic securitate perfecta. sed quod ab Hippone memoratum castellum milibus quadraginta seiungitur, cum in eis regendis et eorum reliquiis licet exiguis colligendis, quae in utroque sexu oberrabant non minaces ulterius sed fugaces. me uiderem latius, quam oportebat, extendi nec adhibendae sufficere diligentiae, quam certissima ratione adhiberi debere cernebam, episcopum ibi ordinandum constituendumque curaui.

### English translation (Claude)

There is a fortified town called Fussala bordering on the territory of Hippo. Before, there had never been a bishop there, but together with the region next to it it belonged to the parish of the church of Hippo. That land had few Catholics; the error of the Donatists wretchedly held the other congregations there, made up of a great multitude of people, so that in that town itself there was no Catholic at all. By God's mercy it came about that all those places adhered to the unity of the Church; through how great labors and dangers of ours it would take long to explain, so that the presbyters first appointed by us there to gather them were robbed, beaten, maimed, blinded, and killed. Yet their sufferings were not useless and fruitless, since the security of unity there was made complete. But since the town I mentioned lies forty miles from Hippo, and I saw that in governing them and gathering their remnants, though small, who were wandering about in both sexes, no longer threatening but fleeing, I was stretched further than was right and could not apply the care that I saw with complete certainty ought to be applied, I arranged for a bishop to be ordained and established there.

### Translation notes

- The violence against the Catholic presbyters is described as Augustine reports it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.2 (CSEL 57:348; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-2).

## Letter 209.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-3
- Source: CSEL 57:348–349
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how, when his chosen candidate withdrew, he hastily had the young reader Antoninus ordained bishop of Fussala.

### Latin text

Quod ut fieret, aptum loco illi congruumque requirebam, qui et Punica lingua esset instructus. et habebam, de quo cogitabam, paratum presbyterum, propter quem ordinandum sanctum senem, qui tunc primatum Numidiae gerebat, de longinquo ut ueniret, rogans litteris impetraui. quo iam praesente omniumque in re tanta suspensis animis ad horam nos ille, qui mihi paratus uidebatur. omni modo resistendo destituit. ego autem, qui utique, sicut exitus docuit, differre potius debui quam periculosum praecipitare negotium, dum nolo grauissimum et sanctissimum senem ad nos usque fatigatum sine effectu, propter quem uenerat tam longe, ad propria remeare, obtuli non petentibus quendam adulescentem Antoninum. qui mecum tunc erat. in monasterio quidem a nobis a paruula aetate nutritum sed praeter lectionis officium nullis clericatus gradibus et laboribus notum. at illi miseri, quod futurum fuerat. ignorantes offerenti eum mihi oboedientissime crediderunt. quid plura? factum est; esse illis episcopus coepit.

### English translation (Claude)

To bring this about, I was looking for someone suited and fitting for that place, who was also trained in the Punic language. And I had a presbyter ready whom I had in mind; and in order to ordain him I asked the holy old man who then held the primacy of Numidia, by letter, to come from far away, and he agreed. When he was already present, and everyone's mind was in suspense in so great a matter, at the last hour the man who seemed to me ready deserted us, resisting in every way. But I, who certainly, as the outcome taught, ought rather to have postponed so dangerous a matter than rushed it, not wishing the most venerable and holy old man, wearied by his journey to us, to return home without accomplishing what he had come so far for, offered them, without their asking, a certain young man named Antoninus, who was with me then. He had indeed been brought up by us in the monastery from early childhood, but apart from the office of reader he was known by no grades or labors of the clergy. And those wretched people, not knowing what was to come, trusted me most obediently when I offered him. What more? It was done; he began to be their bishop.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.3 (CSEL 57:348–349; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-3).

## Letter 209.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-4
- Source: CSEL 57:349
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports that Antoninus was cleared of charges of sexual immorality but found guilty of oppression and extortion, for which he was ordered to make restitution rather than deposed.

### Latin text

Quid faciam? nolo apud tuam uenerationem grauare, quem nutriendum collegi, nolo deserere, quos colligendos timoribus et doloribus parturiui. et, quo modo utrumque agam, reperire non possum. res quippe ad tantum scandalum uenit, ut cum eo hic apud nos causas dicerent, qui de illius episcopatu suscipiendo tamquam bene sibi consulentibus obtemperauerant nobis. in quibus causis cum stuprorum crimina capitalia, quae non ab ipsis. quibus episcopus erat, sed ab aliis quibusdam obiecta fuerant. probari minime potuissent atque ab eis, quae inuidiosissime iactabantur, uideretur esse purgatus, tam miserandus factus est et nobis et aliis, ut, quicquid a castellanis et illius regionis hominibus de intolerabili dominatione, de rapinis et diuersis oppressionibus et contritionibus obiciebatur, nequaquam nobis tale uideretur, ut propter hoc uel propter simul cuncta congesta episcopatu eum putaremus esse priuandum sed restituenda quae probarentur ablata.

### English translation (Claude)

What am I to do? I do not wish to burden him before Your Reverence, whom I took up to bring up; I do not wish to desert those whom I brought forth with fears and pains so that they might be gathered; and how I am to do both I cannot find. For the matter came to such a scandal that those who had obeyed us in accepting him as bishop, as though we were consulting their good, brought cases against him here before us. In these cases, when the capital charges of sexual immorality, which had been brought not by those whose bishop he was but by certain others, could not be proved at all, and he seemed cleared of the charges that were being hurled with the greatest malice, he became so pitiable both to us and to others that whatever was charged by the townspeople and the people of that region about his intolerable domination, his robberies, and various oppressions and extortions did not seem to us such that, because of it, or of all of it heaped together, we thought he should be deprived of the episcopate, but that whatever was proved to have been taken should be restored.

### Translation notes

- “Sexual immorality” renders stupra.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.4 (CSEL 57:349; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-4).

## Letter 209.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-5
- Source: CSEL 57:349–350
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Antoninus kept his episcopal rank but was removed from authority over the people of Fussala, whose resentment was dangerous.

### Latin text

Denique sententias nostras sic temperauimus, ut saluo episcopatu non tamen omnino inpunita relinquerentur, quae non deberent uel eidem ipsi deinceps iterumque facienda uel ceteris imitanda proponi. honorem itaque integrum seruauimus iuueni corrigendo, sed corripiendo minuimus potestatem, ne scilicet eis praeesset ulterius, cum quibus sic egerat. ut dolore iusto eum sibi praeesse ferre omnino non. possent et cum suo illiusque periculo in aliquod scelus forsitan erupturam inpatientiam sui doloris ostenderent. quorum talis animus etiam tunc, quando cum eis de illo episcopi egerunt, euidenter apparuit. cum iam uir spectabilis Celer, de cuius aduersum se praepotenti administratione conquestus est, nullam gerat uel in Africa uel uspiam potestatem..

### English translation (Claude)

Then we so tempered our sentences that, while his episcopate was preserved, things were nevertheless not left entirely unpunished which ought not to be held out either to him to do again hereafter or to others to imitate. So we preserved his rank intact for the young man to be corrected, but by rebuking him we reduced his power, namely that he should no longer be over those with whom he had so dealt that in their just grief they could not bear at all to have him over them, and showed an impatience of their grief that might perhaps break out into some crime, to their danger and his. Their state of mind was clearly evident even then, when the bishops dealt with them about him, although the eminent Celer, of whose overbearing administration against him he complained, now holds no office in Africa or anywhere.

### Translation notes

- Celer was an imperial official, apparently accused by Antoninus of acting against him.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.5 (CSEL 57:349–350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-5).

## Letter 209.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-6
- Source: CSEL 57:350
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Celestine to study the records of Antoninus's conduct and how he deceived the primate of Numidia into commending him to Pope Boniface.

### Latin text

Sed quid multis morer? conlabora, obsecro, nobiscum, pietate uenerabili domine beatissime et debita caritate uenerande sancte papa, et iube. tibi quae directa sunt, omnia recitari. uide, episcopatum qualiter gesserit, quem ad modum iudicio nostro usque adeo consenserit communione priuatus, nisi prius Fussalensibus omnia redderentur, iam postea citra acta aestimatis rebus solidos seposuerit, ut ei communio redderetur, quam uersuta suasione sanctum senem primatem nostrum grauissimum uirum. ut ei cuncta crederet, quem uelut omni modo inculpatum uenerando papae Bonifatio commendaret. induxerit et cetera. quae a me quid opus est recoli, cum memoratus uenerabilis senex ad tuam sanctimoniam uniuersa rettulerit?

### English translation (Claude)

But why should I delay you long? Work with us, I beg you, my most blessed lord, venerable for your piety, and holy pope, to be revered with the love due to you, and have everything that has been sent to you read out to you. See how he conducted his episcopate; how far he agreed to our judgment that he should be deprived of communion unless everything was first restored to the people of Fussala; how afterward, outside the official proceedings, he set aside a sum of solidi, after the property had been valued, so that communion might be restored to him; by what cunning persuasion he induced our holy old primate, a most venerable man, to believe him in everything and to commend him to the venerable Pope Boniface as entirely blameless; and the rest, which there is no need for me to recall, since the venerable old man I mentioned has reported everything to Your Holiness.

### Translation notes

- Boniface I, Celestine's predecessor (418–422).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.6 (CSEL 57:350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-6).

## Letter 209.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-7
- Source: CSEL 57:350–351
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebuts Antoninus's claim that he must either keep his see or lose his rank, arguing that a bishop can be punished without being deposed.

### Latin text

In illis autem multiplicibus gestis, quibus de illo nostrum iudicium continetur, magis deberem uereri, ne tibi minus seuere, quam oporteret, iudicasse uideamur, nisi scirem uos tam propensos ad misericordiam, ut non solum nobis, quia illi pepercimus. uerum etiam ipsi existimetis esse parcendum. sed ille. quod a nobis aut benigne aut remisse factum est, in praescriptionem uertere atque usurpare conatur; clamat: Aut in mea cathedra sedere debui aut episcopus esse non debui, quasi nunc sedeat nisi in sua. propter hoc enim loca illa eidem dimissa atque permissa sunt, in quibus et prius episcopus erat. ne in alienam cathedram contra statuta patrum translatus inlicite diceretur. aut uero quisquam ita esse debet siue seueritatis siue lenitatis exactor. ut, qui non uisi fuerint episcopatus honore priuandi, nullo modo in eis aliquid uindicetur aut, in quibus aliquid uisum fuerit uindicandum, episcopatus honore priuentur?

### English translation (Claude)

In those many proceedings in which our judgment about him is contained, I ought rather to fear that we may seem to you to have judged less severely than we should, did I not know that you are so inclined to mercy that you think mercy should be shown not only to us, because we spared him, but also to him. But what was done by us either kindly or leniently he tries to turn into a legal claim and to seize upon; he cries out: “Either I ought to sit in my own chair, or I ought not to be a bishop,” as though he were now sitting anywhere but in his own. For the places left and allowed to him were precisely those in which he was bishop before, so that it should not be said that he had been unlawfully transferred to another's chair against the statutes of the fathers. Or ought anyone to be such an enforcer of either severity or leniency that those who are not judged worthy of being deprived of episcopal rank should in no way be punished in anything, or that those in whom something is judged worthy of punishment should be deprived of episcopal rank?

### Translation notes

- The “statutes of the fathers” are the canons forbidding the transfer of bishops (e.g. Nicaea, canon 15).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.7 (CSEL 57:350–351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-7).

## Letter 209.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-8
- Source: CSEL 57:351
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites recent cases of bishops in Mauretania Caesariensis who were punished by Rome or with its approval without being deposed.

### Latin text

Existunt exempla ipsa sede apostolica iudicante uel aliorum iudicata firmante quosdam pro culpis quibusdam nec episcopali spoliatos honore nec relictos omnimodis inpunitos. quae ut a nostris temporibus remotissima non requiram, recentia memorabo. clamet Priscus. prouinciae Caesariensis episcopus: Aut ad primatum locus sicut ceteris et mihi patere debuit aut episcopatus mihi remanere non debuit. clamet alius eiusdem prouinciae Victor episcopus, cui relicto in eadem poena. in qua etiam Priscus fuit, nusquam nisi in dioecesi eius ab aliquo communicatur episcopo, clamet, inquam: Aut ubique communicare debui aut etiam in meis locis communicare non debui. clamet tertius eiusdem prouinciae Laurentius episcopus et prorsus huius uocibus clamet: Aut in cathedra, cui ordinatus sum, sedere debui aut episcopus esse non debui. sed quis ista uituperet, nisi qui parum adtendit nec inulta omnia relinquenda nec uno modo omnia uindicanda?

### English translation (Claude)

There are examples, with the apostolic see itself judging or confirming the judgments of others, of some who for certain faults were neither stripped of episcopal rank nor left entirely unpunished. Not to look for those most remote from our times, I will mention recent ones. Let Priscus, a bishop of the province of Caesarea, cry out: “Either the way to the primacy ought to have been open to me as to the others, or the episcopate ought not to have remained to me.” Let another bishop of the same province, Victor, cry out, who, left under the same penalty as Priscus, is received in communion by no bishop anywhere except in his own diocese; let him cry out, I say: “Either I ought to have communion everywhere, or I ought not to have communion even in my own places.” Let a third bishop of the same province, Laurentius, cry out, and cry out in exactly this man's words: “Either I ought to sit in the chair to which I was ordained, or I ought not to be a bishop.” But who would find fault with these decisions, except someone who pays too little attention to the fact that neither should everything be left unpunished nor everything punished in one way?

### Translation notes

- The province is Mauretania Caesariensis.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.8 (CSEL 57:351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-8).

## Letter 209.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-9
- Source: CSEL 57:351–352
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine begs Celestine to protect the people of Fussala from Antoninus's threats of force and to show mercy to both parties.

### Latin text

Quia ergo pastorali uigilique cautela beatissimus papa Bonifatius in epistula sua posuit de Antonino loquens episcopo et ait: Si ordinem rerum nobis fideliter indicauit, accipe nunc ordinem rerum, quem ille in suo libello reticuit, ac deinde, quae post eius sanctae memoriae uiri in Africa lectas litteras gesta sunt, et subueni hominibus opem tuam in Christi misericordia multo auidius quam ille poscentibus, a cuius inquietudine desiderant liberari. iudicia quippe illis et publicas potestates et militares impetus tamquam executuros apostolicae sedis sententiam siue ipse siue rumores creberrimi comminantur, ut miseri homines Christiani catholici grauiora formident a catholico episcopo, quam, cum essent haeretici, a catholicorum imperatorum legibus formidabant. non sinas ista fieri. obsecro te per Christi sanguinem, per apostoli Petri memoriam, qui Christianorum praepositos populorum monuit, ne uiolenter dominentur in fratres. ego Fussalenses catholicos filios in Christo meos et Antoninum episcopum filium in Christo meum benignitati caritatis sanctitatis tuae, quia utrosque diligo, utrosque commendo. neque Fussalensibus suscenseo, quia iustam de me querimoniam ingerunt auribus tuis, quod eis hominem nondum mihi probatum, nondum saltem aetate firmatum, a quo sic affligerentur, inflixi, neque huic noceri uolo. cui quanto magis sinceram habeo caritatem, tanto magis prauae cupiditati eius obsisto. utrique misericordiam mereantur tuam, illi, ne mala patiantur, iste, ne faciat, illi, ne oderint catholicam, si a catholicis episcopis maximeque ab ipsa sede apostolica contra catholicum non eis subuenitur episcopum, iste autem, ne se tanto scelere obstringat, ut, quos molitur inuitos facere suos. a Christo faciat alienos.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, the most blessed Pope Boniface, with pastoral and watchful caution, wrote in his letter, speaking of Bishop Antoninus, “if he has faithfully told us the order of events,” receive now the order of events that he kept quiet in his petition, and then what was done in Africa after the letter of that man of holy memory was read, and help, in the mercy of Christ, the people who beg your aid much more eagerly than he does, from whose restlessness they long to be freed. For either he himself or very frequent rumors threaten them with courts and public authorities and military forces, as though about to execute the sentence of the apostolic see, so that the wretched people, Catholic Christians, fear worse things from a Catholic bishop than they feared, when they were heretics, from the laws of the Catholic emperors. Do not let these things happen, I beg you by the blood of Christ, by the memory of the apostle Peter, who warned those set over Christian peoples not to lord it violently over the brothers. I commend both to the kindness of Your Holiness's love, the Catholic people of Fussala, my sons in Christ, and Bishop Antoninus, my son in Christ, because I love both. I am not angry with the people of Fussala because they bring to your ears a just complaint against me, that I inflicted on them a man not yet proved by me, not yet even matured by age, by whom they were so afflicted; nor do I wish harm to be done to him, to whose depraved desire I am the more opposed, the more sincere my love for him. Let both deserve your mercy: they, that they may not suffer evils; he, that he may not do them; they, that they may not hate the Catholic Church if they receive no help against a Catholic bishop from Catholic bishops, and above all from the apostolic see itself; he, that he may not bind himself with so great a crime as to make strangers to Christ those whom he is striving to make his own against their will.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 5:3: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Pet 5:3. Augustine's comparison with the imperial laws against heretics is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.9 (CSEL 57:351–352; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-9).

## Letter 209.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-10
- Source: CSEL 57:352–353
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine confesses he is so distressed by his mistake that he has thought of resigning his see, and asks Celestine to bring relief.

### Latin text

Me sane, quod confitendum est beatitudini tuae. in isto utrorumque periculo tantus timor et maeror excruciat. ut ab officio cogitem gerendi episcopatus abscedere et me lamentis errori meo conuenientibus dedere, si per eum, cuius episcopatui per inprudentiam suffragatus sum, uastari ecclesiam dei et, quod ipse deus auertat, etiam cum uastantis perditione perire conspexero. recolens enim, quod ait apostolus: Si nosmetipsos diiudicaremus, a domino non iudicaremur iudicabo me ipsum, ut parcat mihi, qui iudicaturus est, uiuos et mortuos. si autem et membra Christi, quae in illa regione sunt, ab exitiabili timore ac tristitia recreaueris et meam senectutem hac misericordi iustitia fueris consolatus, retribuet tibi et in praesenti et in futura uita bona pro bonis. qui per te nobis in ista tribulatione succurrit et qui te in illa sede constituit.

### English translation (Claude)

For my part, I must confess to Your Blessedness, in this danger to both sides such fear and grief torment me that I am thinking of withdrawing from the office of bishop and giving myself up to laments befitting my error, if I see the Church of God laid waste through the man whose episcopate I supported through imprudence, and (may God himself avert it) perishing even with the ruin of the one who lays it waste. For, recalling what the apostle says, “If we judged ourselves, we would not be judged by the Lord,” I will judge myself, so that he who is to judge the living and the dead may spare me. But if you restore the members of Christ in that region from deadly fear and sorrow, and console my old age with this merciful justice, he who through you helps us in this tribulation, and who set you in that see, will repay you good for good both in the present life and in the life to come.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:31: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:1: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 11:31; 2 Tim 4:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 209.10 (CSEL 57:352–353; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-209-10).

## Letter 210.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-210-1
- Source: CSEL 57:353–354
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the nuns Felicitas and Rusticus that God's goodness even to the wicked shows what he prepares for the faithful, and urges them to bear with one another in love.

### Latin text

Bonus est dominus et misericordia eius ubique diffusa, quae nos de uestra caritate in suis uisceribus consolatur. quantum enim diligat credentes et sperantes in se et illum atque inuicem diligentes et quid eis in posterum seruet, hinc maxime ostendit, cum infidelibus et desperatis et peruersis, quibus in mala uoluntate usque in finem perseuerantibus ignem cum diabolo aeternum minatur, in hoc tamen saeculo bona tanta largitur, qui facit oriri solem suum super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos. breuiter enim aliquid dictum est. ut plura cogitentur; quam multa enim habeant impii in hac uita munera et dona gratuita ab illo, quem contemnunt, enumerare quis potest? inter quae illud magnum, quod exemplis interpositarum tribulationum. quas huius saeculi dulcedini tamquam bonus medicus miscet. admonet eos, si adtendere uelint, fugere ab ira uentura et, cum in uia sunt, id est in hac uita, concordare cum sermone dei, quem sibi aduersarium male uiuendo fecerunt. quid ergo non misericorditer praestatur hominibus a domino deo, a quo etiam tribulatio beneficium est? nam res prospera donum est consolantis, res autem aduersa donum est admonentis dei. et si haec praestat. ut dixi, etiam malis, quid praeparat sustinentibus se? quorum in numero uos per illius gratiam congregatos esse gaudete sustinentes inuicem in dilectione. studentes seruare unitatem spiritus in uinculo pacis. non enim deerit, quod in uobis inuicem sufferatis, nisi cum uos ita portauerit dominus absorpta morte in uictoriam, ut sit deus omnia in omnibus.

### English translation (Claude)

The Lord is good, and his mercy is spread everywhere, and it consoles us in his heart concerning your love. For how much he loves those who believe and hope in him and love him and one another, and what he keeps for them hereafter, he shows above all in this: that to the unbelieving, the despairing, and the perverse, whom he threatens with eternal fire with the devil if they persevere in their evil will to the end, he nevertheless bestows such great goods in this world, he who makes his sun rise on the good and the bad and sends rain on the just and the unjust. This is said briefly so that more may be thought of; for who can count how many gifts and free favors the ungodly have in this life from him whom they despise? Among these is that great one, that by the examples of tribulations interposed, which like a good physician he mixes with the sweetness of this world, he warns them, if they are willing to heed, to flee from the wrath to come, and, while they are on the way, that is, in this life, to come to agreement with the word of God, which they have made their adversary by living badly. What, then, is not granted mercifully to men by the Lord God, from whom even tribulation is a benefit? For prosperity is the gift of God consoling, and adversity the gift of God warning. And if he grants these things, as I said, even to the wicked, what does he prepare for those who wait for him? Rejoice that by his grace you have been gathered into their number, bearing with one another in love, eager to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. For there will not fail to be something for you to bear in one another, until the Lord so carries you, when death has been swallowed up in victory, that God may be all in all.

### Scripture references

- Ps 145:9 (144:9 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:45: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 3:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 5:25: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:2–3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Felicitas, the prioress, Rusticus, the priest, and the sisters of the women's monastery at Hippo. Ps 145:9; Matt 5:45; Matt 3:7; Matt 5:25; Eph 4:2–3; 1 Cor 15:54, 28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 210.1 (CSEL 57:353–354; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-210-1).

## Letter 210.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-210-2
- Source: CSEL 57:354–356
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine teaches the nuns how to give and receive correction in love and urges them to end quarrels quickly before anger corrupts the heart.

### Latin text

Dissensiones autem numquam debent amari. sed aliquando tamen aut caritate nascuntur aut caritatem probant. quis enim facile inuenitur, qui uelit reprehendi? et ubi est ille sapiens, de quo dictum est: Corripe sapientem et amabit te? numquid tamen ideo non debemus reprehendere et corripere fratrem, ne securus tendat in mortem? solet enim fieri et frequenter accidit. ut ad horam contristetur, cum reprehenditur, et resistat et contendat et tamen postea consideret secum in silentio, ubi nemo est nisi deus et ipse nec timet displicere hominibus. quia corripitur, sed timet displicere deo. quia non corrigitur, et deinceps non faciat illud, quod iuste reprehensus est. et, quantum odit peccatum suum, tantum diligat fratrem, quem sensit hostem peccati sui. si autem de illo numero est, de quo dictum est: Corripe stultum et adiciet, ut oderit te. non de caritate illius dissensio nascitur. sed tamen caritatem reprehensoris sui exercet et probat, quia non ei rependitur odium, sed dilectio, quae cogit reprehendere. inperturbata perdurat, etiam cum ille, qui reprehensus est, odit. si autem ille. qui corripit, reddere uult malum pro malo ei, qui corripienti indignatur, non fuit dignus, qui corriperet, sed dignus plane, qui etiam ipse corripi deberet. haec agite. ut aut non inter uos existant indignationes aut exortae statim celerrima pace perimantur. maiorem date operam concordandis uobis quam redarguendis, quia, sicut acetum corrumpit uas. si diutius ibi fuerit, sic ira corrumpit cor, si in alium diem durauerit. haec ergo agite — et deus pacis erit nobiscum - orantes simul et pro nobis. ut ea, quae bene monemus, alacriter impleamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Dissensions ought never to be loved; yet sometimes they either arise from love or test love. For who is easily found who wishes to be rebuked? And where is that wise man of whom it was said, “Rebuke a wise man and he will love you”? Ought we, then, for that reason not to rebuke and correct a brother, lest he go securely toward death? For it often happens that he is saddened for the moment when he is rebuked, and resists and argues, and yet afterward considers within himself in silence, where there is no one but God and himself, and does not fear displeasing men because he is corrected, but fears displeasing God because he is not corrected; and thereafter he does not do what he was justly rebuked for, and loves the brother whom he perceived to be the enemy of his sin as much as he hates his sin. But if he is of the number of whom it was said, “Rebuke a fool and he will go on to hate you,” the dissension does not arise from his love, but it nevertheless exercises and tests the love of the one who rebukes him, because hatred is not paid back to him, but the love that compels the rebuke remains undisturbed, even when the one who was rebuked hates. But if the one who corrects wishes to return evil for evil to the one who is indignant at being corrected, he was not worthy to correct, but plainly worthy to be corrected himself. Do this, so that resentments may not arise among you, or, if they arise, may be destroyed at once by a very speedy peace. Take more pains to agree with one another than to refute one another; for just as vinegar corrupts the vessel if it stays there too long, so anger corrupts the heart if it lasts into another day. Do these things, then, and the God of peace will be with us; praying at the same time for us too, that we may eagerly fulfil the good things we advise.

### Scripture references

- Prov 9:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 4:26: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 4:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 9:8; Rom 12:17; Eph 4:26; Phil 4:9 (“with us” in the text, where the Epistle has “with you”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 210.2 (CSEL 57:354–356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/208-1/#p-210-2).

## Letter 211.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-1
- Source: CSEL 57:356–357
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the nuns of Hippo that he stayed away during their dispute so as not to have to punish them.

### Latin text

Sicut parata est seueritas peccata, quae inuenerit, uindicare, ita non uult caritas, quod uindicet, inuenire. haec causa fecit, ut non uenirem ad uos, cum meam praesentiam quaereretis non ad pacis uestrae gaudium sed ad dissensionis uestrae augmentum. quo modo enim contemnerem et inpunitum relinquerem, si et me praesente tantus uester tumultus existeret, quantus me absente etsi oculos meos latuit, tamen aures meas uestris uocibus uerberauit? nam fortassis etiam maior esset uestra seditio in praesentia mea, quam necesse esset uobis non concedi, quae in perniciosissimum exemplum contra sanam disciplinam, quod uobis non expedit, petebatis; ac sic non, quales uolo, inuenirem uos et ipse inuenirer a uobis, qualem non uolebatis.

### English translation (Claude)

Just as severity is ready to punish the sins it finds, so love does not wish to find anything to punish. This is why I did not come to you, when you were seeking my presence, not for the joy of your peace but for the increase of your dissension. For how could I have disregarded it and left it unpunished, if in my presence too so great an uproar of yours had arisen as, in my absence, though it was hidden from my eyes, still struck my ears with your voices? For perhaps your sedition would have been even greater in my presence, since it would have been necessary not to grant you what you were demanding, to the most pernicious example and against sound discipline, which is not good for you; and so I would not have found you such as I wish, and I myself would have been found by you such as you did not wish.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 12:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 211 is addressed to the women's monastery at Hippo, which was in revolt against its prioress. 2 Cor 12:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.1 (CSEL 57:356–357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-1).

## Letter 211.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-2
- Source: CSEL 57:357
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he stayed away to spare them and himself, praying instead for the community whose holy life had been his consolation.

### Latin text

Cum ergo scribat apostolus ad Corinthios dicens: Testem deum facio super animam meam, quia parcens uobis nondum ueni Corinthum, non quia dominamur fidei uestrae, sed cooperatores sumus gaudii uestri, hoc ego etiam dico uobis, quia parcens uobis non ad uos ueni. peperci etiam mihi, ne tristitiam super tristitiam haberem, et elegi, non ut exhiberem faciem meam uobis, sed effunderem cor meum deo pro uobis et causam magni periculi uestri non apud uos uerbis sed apud deum lacrimis agerem, ne conuertat in luctum gaudium meum, quo soleo gaudere de uobis et inter tanta scandala, quibus ubique abundat hic mundus, aliquando consolari cogitans copiosam congregationem et castam dilectionem et sanctam conuersationem uestram et largiorem gratiam dei, quae data est uobis, ut non solum carnales nuptias contemneretis, uerum etiam in domo societatem eligeretis habitandi unanimes, ut sit uobis anima una et cor unum in deum.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, the apostle writes to the Corinthians, saying, “I call God as witness against my soul that it was to spare you that I did not come again to Corinth; not that we lord it over your faith, but we are fellow workers for your joy,” I too say this to you, that it was to spare you that I did not come to you. I spared myself too, so as not to have sorrow upon sorrow, and I chose not to show my face to you but to pour out my heart to God for you, and to plead the cause of your great danger not with you in words but with God in tears, that he may not turn into mourning my joy, with which I am accustomed to rejoice over you, and amid so many scandals with which this world everywhere abounds, sometimes to be consoled, thinking of your large community, your chaste love, your holy way of life, and the more abundant grace of God that has been given you, so that you not only despised fleshly marriage but also chose to live together in a house of one mind, so that you may have one soul and one heart toward God.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 1:23–24: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:27: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 1:23–24; Phil 2:27; Acts 4:32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.2 (CSEL 57:357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-2).

## Letter 211.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-3
- Source: CSEL 57:357–358
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns the nuns that a few have led the community astray and urges them to pray to be freed from quarrels and dissension.

### Latin text

Haec in nobis bona, haec dei dona considerans inter multas tempestates, quibus ex aliis malis quatitur, cor meum solet utcumque requiescere. currebatis bene. quis uos fascinauit? suasio illa non est ex deo, qui uocauit nos. modicum fermenti — nolo dicere, quod sequitur; hoc enim magis cupio et oro et hortor, ut ipsum fermentum reuertatur in melius, non tota massa, sicut paene iam fecerat, conuertatur in peius. si ergo repullulastis sanum sapere, orate, ne intretis in temptationem, ne iterum in contentiones. aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, detractiones, seditiones, susurrationes. non enim sic plantauimus et rigauimus hortum dominicum in uobis, ut spinas istas metamus ex uobis. si autem adhuc uestra tumultuatur infirmitas, orate, ut eruamini de temptatione. quae autem conturbant uos, si adhuc conturbant uos, nisi se correxerint, portabunt iudicium, quaecumque illae fuerint.

### English translation (Claude)

Considering these good things in you, these gifts of God, my heart is accustomed to find some rest amid the many storms by which it is shaken from other evils. You were running well; who has bewitched you? That persuasion is not from God, who called us. A little leaven… I do not wish to say what follows; for this I desire and pray and urge rather, that the leaven itself may turn back to the better, and not the whole lump, as it had almost done already, be turned to the worse. If, then, you have sprouted again to sound thinking, pray that you may not enter into temptation, nor again into quarrels, jealousies, animosities, dissensions, slanders, seditions, whisperings. For we did not plant and water the Lord's garden in you in order to reap these thorns from you. But if your weakness is still in tumult, pray that you may be delivered from temptation. And as for those who are troubling you, if they are still troubling you, unless they correct themselves, they will bear judgment, whoever they may be.

### Scripture references

- Gal 5:7–10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 26:41: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:20: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 5:7–10 (“A little leaven leavens the whole lump”); Matt 26:41; 2 Cor 12:20; 1 Cor 3:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.3 (CSEL 57:357–358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-3).

## Letter 211.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-4
- Source: CSEL 57:358–359
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes the nuns for seeking to replace their long-serving prioress and urges them to repent like Peter rather than Judas.

### Latin text

Cogitate, quid mali sit, ut, cum de deo natis in unitate gaudeamus, interna schismata in monasterio lugeamus. perseuerate in bono proposito et non desiderabitis mutare praepositam, qua in monasterio illo per tam multos annos perseuerante et numero et aetate creuistis, quae uos mater non utero sed animo suscepit. omnes enim, quae illuc uenistis, ibi eam aut sanctae praepositae sorori meae seruientem, placentem aut etiam ipsam praepositam, quae uos suscepit, inuenistis; sub illa estis eruditae, sub illa uelatae, sub illa multiplicatae; et sic tumultuamini, ut uobis eam mutetis, cum lugere deberetis, si eam uobis mutare uellemus. ipsa est, quam nostis; ipsa est, ad quam uenistis; ipsa est, quam per tot annos habendo creuistis. nouum non accepistis nisi praepositum; aut si propter illum quaeritis nouitatem et in eius inuidia contra matrem uestram sic rebellastis, cur non potius hoc petistis. ut ipse uobis mutetur? si autem hoc exhorretis, quia noui, quo modo eum in Christo uenerabiliter diligatis, cur non potius illam? in uobis namque regendis sic praepositi rudimenta turbantur, ut magis uelit uos ipse deserere, quam istam ex nobis famam et inuidiam sustinere, ut dicatur non aliam uos quaesituras fuisse praepositam, nisi ipsum coepissetis habere praepositum. tranquillet ergo deus et componat animos uestros; non in uobis praeualeat opus diaboli, sed pax Christi uincat in cordibus uestris; nec dolore animi, quia non fit, quod uultis, uel quia pudet uoluisse, quod uelle non debuistis, erubescendo curratis in mortem, sed potius paenitendo resumatis uirtutem nec habeatis paenitentiam Iudae traditoris sed potius lacrimas Petri pastoris.

### English translation (Claude)

Consider what an evil it is that, while we rejoice over those born of God in unity, we should mourn over internal schisms in the monastery. Persevere in your good purpose, and you will not desire to change your prioress, under whom, as she persevered in that monastery for so many years, you have grown both in number and in age, and who has received you as a mother, not in the womb but in the spirit. For all of you who came there found her there either serving and pleasing my sister, the holy prioress, or as prioress herself receiving you. Under her you were instructed, under her you received the veil, under her you multiplied; and yet you are in an uproar to have her changed, when you ought to mourn if we wished to change her for you. She is the one you know; she is the one to whom you came; she is the one under whom, through so many years, you have grown. You have received nothing new except a provost; or if it is because of him that you seek something new, and in resentment of him have so rebelled against your mother, why did you not rather ask that he be changed for you? But if you shrink from this, because I know how you love him reverently in Christ, why not her rather? For in governing you, the beginnings of the provost's work are so disturbed that he would rather leave you himself than bear the reproach and ill will of the report that you would not have sought another prioress had you not begun to have him as provost. May God, then, calm and settle your minds; let not the work of the devil prevail in you, but let the peace of Christ conquer in your hearts; and do not, out of grief of mind because what you want is not done, or because you are ashamed to have wanted what you ought not to have wanted, run in shame to death, but rather recover your virtue by repentance, and have not the repentance of Judas the betrayer but rather the tears of Peter the shepherd.

### Scripture references

- Col 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 27:3–5: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 26:75: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine's sister had been the first prioress. Col 3:15; Matt 27:3–5; Matt 26:75. The provost (praepositus) is the priest Rusticus, as in Letter 210. “Those born of God in unity” translates de deo natis in unitate as printed; other texts read “over the Donatists” (de Donatistis), referring to their return to unity.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.4 (CSEL 57:358–359; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-4).

## Letter 211.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-5
- Source: CSEL 57:359–360
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out the first rule of the monastery: one heart and soul, common property, and distribution to each according to need.

### Latin text

Haec sunt, quae ut obseruetis praecipimus in monasterio constitutae. primum propter quod estis in unum congregatae. ut unanimes habitetis in domo et sit uobis cor unum et anima una in deum et non dicatis aliquid proprium, sed sint uobis omnia communia, et distribuatur unicuique uestrum a praeposita uestra uictus et tegumentum non aequaliter omnibus, quia non aequaliter ualetis omnes, sed unicuique sicut opus fuerit. sic enim legitis in actibus apostolorum, quia erant illis omnia communia et distribuebatur singulis, prout cuique opus erat. quae aliquid habebant in saeculo, quando ingressae sunt monasterium, libenter uelint illud esse commune: quae autem non habebant, non ea quaerant in monasterio, quae nec foris habere potuerunt, sed tamen earum infirmitati, quod opus est, tribuatur, etiam si pauperies earum, quando foris erant, nec ipsa necessaria poterat inuenire; at nunc non ideo se putent esse felices. quia inuenerunt uictum et tegumentum, quale foris inuenire non potuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

These are the things that we command you who are established in the monastery to observe. First, the reason why you have been gathered together is that you may dwell in the house of one mind, and have one heart and one soul toward God; and that you call nothing your own, but have all things in common; and that food and clothing be distributed to each of you by your prioress, not equally to all, because you are not all equally strong, but to each as she has need. For so you read in the Acts of the Apostles, that they had all things in common and distribution was made to each as any had need. Those who had something in the world, when they entered the monastery, should willingly have it become common; but those who had nothing should not seek in the monastery what they could not have even outside; yet what is needed for their weakness should be given them, even if their poverty, when they were outside, could not find even the necessities; but let them not now think themselves happy because they have found food and clothing such as they could not find outside.

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:6 (67:7 Vulg.): allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 4:35: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 68:6 (Vulgate 67:7, “who makes them dwell of one mind in a house”); Acts 4:32, 35. This section begins the monastic rule known as the Rule of Saint Augustine, here in its form for women.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.5 (CSEL 57:359–360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-5).

## Letter 211.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-6
- Source: CSEL 57:360–361
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns poor sisters against pride in their new status and rich sisters against disdain or pride in their gifts, urging all to honor God in one another.

### Latin text

Nec erigant ceruices, quia sociantur, ad quas foris accedere non audebant, sed sursum cor habeant et terrena bona non quaerant, ne incipiant monasteria esse diuitibus utilia non pauperibus, si diuites illic humiliantur et pauperes illic inflantur. sed rursus etiam illae, quae aliquid esse uidebantur in saeculo, non habeant fastidio sorores suas. quae ad illam sanctam societatem ex paupertate uenerunt; magis autem studeant non de parentum diuitum dignitate sed de pauperum sororum societate gloriari. nec extollantur, si communi uitae de suis facultatibus aliquid contulerunt, nec de suis diuitiis magis superbiant, quia eas monasterio partiuntur, quam si eis in saeculo fruerentur. alia quippe quaecumque iniquitas in malis operibus exercetur, ut fiant: superbia uero etiam in bonis operibus insidiatur, ut pereant. et quid prodest dispergere dando pauperibus et pauperem fieri, si anima misera superbior efficiatur contemnendo, quam fuerat possidendo? omnes ergo unanimiter et concorditer uiuite et honorate in uobis inuicem deum, cuius templa factae estis.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor should they lift up their necks because they are associated with women whom they did not dare to approach outside; but let them lift up their hearts and not seek earthly goods, lest monasteries begin to be useful to the rich and not to the poor, if the rich are humbled there and the poor puffed up there. But again, those too who seemed to be something in the world should not disdain their sisters who have come to that holy fellowship from poverty; rather let them be eager to glory not in the rank of rich parents but in the fellowship of poor sisters. Nor should they be lifted up if they have contributed something from their means to the common life, nor be prouder of their riches because they share them with the monastery than if they enjoyed them in the world. For every other kind of iniquity is exercised in evil works, so that they may be done; but pride lies in wait even in good works, so that they may perish. And what does it profit to scatter by giving to the poor and to become poor, if the wretched soul becomes prouder by despising riches than it had been by possessing them? So all of you live in unity and concord, and honor God in one another, whose temples you have become.

### Scripture references

- Ps 112:9 (111:9 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Cor 13:3: allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 6:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 112:9 (2 Cor 9:9); 1 Cor 13:3; 2 Cor 6:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.6 (CSEL 57:360–361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-6).

## Letter 211.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-7
- Source: CSEL 57:361
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine prescribes set times of prayer, reserves the oratory for prayer, and asks that the heart attend to what the voice sings.

### Latin text

Orationibus instate horis et temporibus constitutis. in oratorio nemo aliquid agat, nisi ad quod est factum, unde et nomen accepit, ut, si aliquae etiam praeter horas constitutas, si eis uacat, orare uoluerint, non eis sint impedimento, quae aliquid ibi agere uoluerint. psalmis et hymnis cum oratis deum, hoc uersetur in corde, quod profertur in uoce, et nolite cantare, nisi quod legitis esse cantandum; quod autem non ita scriptum est, ut cantetur, non cantetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Be constant in prayer at the hours and times appointed. In the oratory let no one do anything except that for which it was made, from which it also received its name, so that if some wish to pray there even outside the appointed hours, when they have leisure, they may not be hindered by those who wish to do something else there. When you pray to God in psalms and hymns, let what is uttered by the voice be turned over in the heart; and do not sing anything except what you read is to be sung; but what is not so written as to be sung, let it not be sung.

### Scripture references

- Col 4:2: allusion, high confidence
- Col 3:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Col 4:2; Col 3:16 (Eph 5:19).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.7 (CSEL 57:361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-7).

## Letter 211.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-8
- Source: CSEL 57:361
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine prescribes fasting as health permits, no eating outside mealtimes except for the sick, and reading aloud during meals.

### Latin text

Carnem uestram domate ieiuniis et abstinentia escae et potus, quantum ualitudo permittit. quando autem aliqua non potest ieiunare, non tamen extra horam prandii aliquid alimentorum sumat. nisi cum aegrotat. cum acceditis ad mensam. donec inde surgatis, quod uobis secundum consuetudinem legitur, sine tumultu et contentionibus audite nec solae uobis fauces sumant cibum, sed et aures percipiant dei uerbum.

### English translation (Claude)

Subdue your flesh by fasting and abstinence from food and drink, as far as health permits. But when someone cannot fast, she should still not take any food outside the hour of the meal, unless she is ill. When you come to table, until you rise from it, listen without noise or arguments to what is read to you according to custom; let not your mouths alone take in food, but let your ears also receive the word of God.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:27: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 9:27.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.8 (CSEL 57:361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-8).

## Letter 211.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-9
- Source: CSEL 57:361–362
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that sisters of delicate upbringing and the convalescent may receive more, and urges all to count frugality as true riches.

### Latin text

Quae infirmae sunt ex pristina consuetudine, si aliter tractantur in uictu, non debet aliis molestum esse nec iniustum uideri. quas fecit alia consuetudo fortiores. nec illas putent feliciores, quia sumunt, quod non sumunt ipsae, sed sibi potius gratulentur, quia ualent, quod non ualent illae. et si eis, quae uenerunt ex moribus delicatioribus ad monasterium, aliquid alimentorum, uestimentorum, stramentorum, operimentorum datur, quod aliis fortioribus et ideo felicioribus non datur, cogitare debent, quibus non datur, quantum de sua saeculari uita illae ad istam descenderint, quamuis usque ad aliarum, quae sunt corpore fortiores, frugalitatem peruenire nequiuerint. nec illae debent conturbari, quod eas uident amplius, non quia honorantur, sed quia tolerantur, accipere, ne contingat detestanda peruersitas, ut in monasterio, ubi, quantum possunt, fiunt diuites laboriosae, fiant pauperes delicatae. sane, quem ad modum aegrotantes necesse habent minus accipere, ne grauentur, ita post aegritudinem sic tractandae sunt, ut citius recreentur, etiam si de humillima saeculi paupertate uenerunt, tamquam hoc illis contulerit recentior aegritudo, quod diuitibus anterior consuetudo. sed cum uires pristinas reparauerint, redeant ad feliciorem consuetudinem suam, quae famulas dei tanto amplius decet, quanto minus indigent, nec ibi eas teneat uoluntas iam uegetas, quo necessitas leuarat infirmas. illae se aestiment ditiores, quae fuerint in sustentanda parcitate fortiores; melius est enim minus egere quam plus habere.

### English translation (Claude)

If those who are weak from their former way of life are treated differently in food, this ought not to be troublesome to others, nor seem unjust to those whom a different way of life has made stronger. Let them not think those happier because they receive what they themselves do not, but let them rather congratulate themselves because they are able to do what those cannot. And if those who have come to the monastery from more delicate habits are given some food, clothing, bedding, or coverings that is not given to others who are stronger and therefore happier, those to whom it is not given ought to consider how far the others have come down from their worldly life to this one, although they have not been able to reach the frugality of others who are stronger in body. Nor ought they to be disturbed because they see them receive more, not because they are honored but because they are borne with; lest there arise the detestable perversity that in a monastery, where the rich become hardworking as far as they can, the poor become delicate. Of course, just as the sick must take less so as not to be burdened, so after illness they should be treated in such a way that they recover more quickly, even if they came from the lowest poverty of the world, as though recent illness had conferred on them what earlier habit conferred on the rich. But when they have recovered their former strength, let them return to their happier way of life, which befits the handmaids of God the more, the less they need; and let not their will keep them, now vigorous, where necessity had raised them when weak. Let those think themselves richer who have been stronger in bearing frugality; for it is better to need less than to have more.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.9 (CSEL 57:361–362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-9).

## Letter 211.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-10
- Source: CSEL 57:362–364
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine instructs the nuns on modest dress and conduct in public, warning that unchaste looks destroy chastity even without bodily sin.

### Latin text

Non sit notabilis habitus uester nec affectetis uestibus placere sed moribus; non sint uobis tam tenera capitum tegmina, ut retiola subter appareant. capillos ex nulla parte nudos habeatis nec foris uel spargat neglegentia uel componat industria. quando proceditis. simul ambulate; cum ueneritis, quo itis, simul state. in incessu, in statu, in habitu, in omnibus motibus uestris nihil fiat, quod inliciat cuiusquam libidinem, sed quod uestram deceat sanctitatem. oculi uestri etsi iaciuntur in aliquem, figantur in neminem. neque enim, quando proceditis, uiros uidere prohibemini sed appetere aut ab ipsis appeti uelle. nec tactu solo sed affectu quoque et aspectu appetitur et appetit femina. nec dicatis uos habere animos pudicos, si habeatis oculos inpudicos, quia inpudicus oculus inpudici cordis est nuntius et, cum se inuicem sibi etiam tacente lingua conspectu mutuo corda nuntiant inpudica et secundum concupiscentiam carnis alterutro delectantur ardore, etiam intactis ab inmunda uiolatione corporibus fugit castitas ipsa de moribus. nec putare debet, quae in masculo figit oculum et illius in se ipsam diligit fixum, non uideri ab aliis, cum hoc facit; uidetur omnino, et a quibus uideri non arbitratur. sed ecce lateat et a nemine hominum uideatur, quid faciet de illo superno inspectore, quem latere nihil potest? an ideo putandus est non uidere, quia tanto uidet patientius quanto sapientius? illi ergo timeat sancta femina displicere, ne uelit uiro male placere; illum cogitet omnia uidere, ne uelit uirum male uidere. illius namque et in hac causa commendatus est timor. ubi scriptum est: Abominatio est domino defigens oculum. quando ergo simul estis in ecclesia et ubicumque, ubi et uiri sunt, inuicem uestram pudicitiam custodite; deus enim, qui habitat in uobis, etiam isto modo uos custodit ex uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

Let your dress not be conspicuous, and do not seek to please by clothes but by conduct; let your head coverings not be so thin that the hairnets show beneath. Have your hair covered on every side, and let neither carelessness scatter it outside nor care arrange it. When you go out, walk together; when you reach where you are going, stand together. In walking, in standing, in dress, in all your movements, let nothing be done that may provoke anyone's desire, but what befits your holiness. Your eyes, even if they fall on someone, should be fixed on no one. For when you go out you are not forbidden to see men, but to desire them or to wish to be desired by them. Not by touch alone, but by feeling and by look also, a woman desires and is desired. And do not say that you have chaste minds if you have unchaste eyes, because an unchaste eye is the messenger of an unchaste heart; and when, even with the tongue silent, unchaste hearts announce themselves to each other by a mutual look and take delight, according to the concupiscence of the flesh, in each other's ardor, even though the bodies remain untouched by unclean violation, chastity itself flees from the conduct. Nor ought she who fixes her eye on a man and loves to have his fixed on her to think that she is not seen by others when she does this; she is certainly seen, and by those by whom she does not think she is seen. But suppose she is hidden and seen by no human being: what will she do about that Watcher on high, from whom nothing can be hidden? Or is he to be thought not to see because he sees the more patiently, the more wisely? Let the holy woman fear to displease him, then, so that she may not wish to please a man wrongly; let her think that he sees everything, so that she may not wish to look at a man wrongly. For the fear of him is commended in this matter too, where it is written: “He who fixes his eye is an abomination to the Lord.” So when you are together in church and wherever men also are, guard one another's modesty; for God, who dwells in you, guards you in this way too, by means of yourselves.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:28: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 John 2:16: allusion, medium confidence
- Prov 27:20: quotation, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 6:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 5:28; 1 John 2:16; Prov 27:20 (LXX; the Old Latin form “he who fixes his eye is an abomination to the Lord”); 2 Cor 6:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.10 (CSEL 57:362–364; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-10).

## Letter 211.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-11
- Source: CSEL 57:364–365
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine prescribes a procedure of private warning, witnesses, report to the prioress, and correction or expulsion for sisters who persist in faults.

### Latin text

Et si hanc, de qua loquor, oculi petulantiam in aliqua uestrum aduerteritis, statim admonete, ne coepta progrediantur, sed e proximo corrigantur. si autem et post admonitionem iterum uel alio quocumque die id ipsum eam facere uideritis, iam uelut uulneratam sanandam prodat, quaecumque inuenire potuit hoc, prius tamen et alteri uel tertiae demonstratam, ut duarum uel trium possit ore conuinci et competenti seueritate coherceri. nec uos iudicetis esse maliuolas, quando haec indicatis; magis quippe innocentes non estis, si sorores uestras, quas indicando corrigere potestis, tacendo perire permittitis. si enim soror tua uulnus haberet in corpore, quod occultari uellet, dum timeret secari, nonne crudeliter abs te sileretur et misericorditer indicaretur? quanto ergo potius eam debes manifestare, ne perniciosius putrescat in corde! sed antequam aliis demonstretur, per quas conuincenda est, si negauerit, praepositae debet ostendi, ne forte possit secretius correcta non innotescere ceteris. si autem negauerit, tunc mentienti adhibendae sunt aliae, ut iam coram omnibus possit non ab una teste argui sed a duabus tribusque conuinci. conuicta uero secundum praepositae uel presbyteri arbitrium debet emendatoriam sustinere disciplinam. quam si ferre recusauerit et si ipsa non abscesserit, de uestra societate proiciatur. non enim hoc crudeliter fit sed misericorditer, ne contagione pestifera plurimas perdat. et hoc, quod dixi de oculo non figendo, etiam in ceteris inueniendis, prohibendis, indicandis, conuincendis uindicandisque peccatis diligenter obseruetur cum dilectione hominum et odio uitiorum. quaecumque autem in tantum progressa fuerit malum, ut occulte ab aliquo litteras uel quaelibet munuscula accipiat, si hoc ultro confitetur, parcatur illi et oretur pro ea; si autem deprehenditur atque conuincitur, secundum arbitrium praepositae uel presbyteri uel etiam episcopi grauius emendetur.

### English translation (Claude)

And if you notice in any one of you this wantonness of the eye of which I speak, warn her at once, so that what has begun may not go further but be corrected promptly. But if, even after the warning, you see her do the same thing again, or on any other day, whoever has been able to discover this should report her as one wounded who needs healing; but first she should be pointed out to a second or third, so that she can be convicted by the mouth of two or three and restrained with fitting severity. And do not judge yourselves malicious when you report these things; rather, you are not innocent if, by keeping silent, you allow your sisters to perish whom you could correct by reporting them. For if your sister had a wound in her body that she wished to hide because she was afraid of the knife, would it not be cruel of you to keep silent and merciful to disclose it? How much more, then, ought you to make her known, lest she fester more dangerously in the heart! But before she is pointed out to the others by whom she is to be convicted if she denies it, she should be shown to the prioress, in case, corrected more privately, she may not become known to the rest. But if she denies it, then the others are to be brought to the one who lies, so that before all she may be not accused by one witness but convicted by two or three. And when convicted she must undergo corrective discipline at the discretion of the prioress or the presbyter. If she refuses to bear it, even if she does not leave of her own accord, let her be expelled from your fellowship. For this is done not cruelly but mercifully, lest by a deadly contagion she destroy very many. And what I have said about not fixing the eye should be carefully observed also in discovering, forbidding, reporting, convicting, and punishing other sins, with love for persons and hatred for vices. But whoever has gone so far in evil as to receive secretly letters or any little gifts from anyone, if she confesses it of her own accord, let her be spared and let prayer be made for her; but if she is caught and convicted, let her be more severely corrected at the discretion of the prioress or the presbyter or even the bishop.

### Scripture references

- Matt 18:15–17: allusion, high confidence
- Deut 19:15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 18:15–17; Deut 19:15 (2 Cor 13:1).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.11 (CSEL 57:364–365; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-11).

## Letter 211.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-12
- Source: CSEL 57:365–367
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rules that clothes be kept in common and work done for the common good, since love puts common things before its own.

### Latin text

Vestes uestras habete sub una custode uel duabus uel quot sufficere potuerint ad eas excutiendas, ne tinea laedantur, et, sicut pascimini ex uno cellario, sic induamini ex uno uestiario. et si fieri potest, non ad uos pertineat, quid uobis induendum pro temporis congruentia proferatur, utrum hoc recipiat unaquaeque uestrum, quod deposuerat. an aliud, quod alia habuerat, dum tamen unicuique, quod opus est, non negetur. si autem hinc inter uos contentiones et murmura oriuntur, cum queritur aliqua deterius aliquid se accepisse, quam prius habuerat, et indignam se iudicat esse, quae ita uestiatur, sicut alia soror eius uestiebatur, hinc uos probate, quantum uobis desit in illo interiore sancto habitu cordis, quae pro habitu corporis litigatis. tamen si uestra toleratur infirmitas, ut hoc recipiatis, quod posueratis, in uno tamen loco sub communibus custodibus habete, quod ponitis, ita sane, ut nulla sibi aliquid operetur, siue unde induatur siue ubi iaceat siue unde cingatur uel operiatur uel caput contegat; sed omnia opera uestra in commune fiant maiore studio et frequentiori alacritate, quam si uobis propria faceretis. caritas enim, de qua scriptum est, quod non quaerit, quae sua sunt, sic intellegitur, quia communia propriis non propria communibus anteponit. et ideo, quanto amplius rem communem quam propriam curaueritis, tanto amplius profecisse noueritis, ut in omnibus, quibus utitur transitura necessitas, superemineat, quae permanet, caritas. consequens ergo est, ut etiam illud, quod suis uel filiabus uel aliqua necessitudine ad se pertinentibus in monasterio constitutis aliquis uel aliqua contulerit siue uestem siue quodlibet aliud inter necessaria deputandum, non occulte accipiatur et sit in potestate praepositae, ut in commune redactum, cui necessarium fuerit, praebeatur. quod si aliqua rem sibi conlatam celauerit, furti iudicio condemnetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Keep your clothes under one keeper, or two, or as many as are enough to shake them out so that they are not damaged by moths; and as you are fed from one storeroom, so be clothed from one wardrobe. And if possible, let it not concern you what is brought out for you to wear according to the season, whether each of you receives what she had put away or something else that another had, provided that what each needs is not denied her. But if quarrels and murmuring arise among you over this, when someone complains that she has received something worse than she had before, and judges herself unworthy to be dressed as another sister of hers was dressed, prove from this how much you lack in that inner holy dress of the heart, you who quarrel over the dress of the body. Yet if your weakness is tolerated so that you receive what you had put away, still keep what you put away in one place under common keepers; and so, of course, that no one works at anything for herself, whether to dress herself, or where to lie, or to gird or cover herself or veil her head; but let all your work be done in common, with greater eagerness and more frequent readiness than if you were doing it for yourselves. For love, of which it is written that it does not seek its own, is understood in this way, that it puts common things before its own, not its own before common things. And therefore know that the more you care for the common good than for your own, the more you have progressed, so that in all things that passing necessity uses, love, which abides, may stand above them. It follows, therefore, that if anyone, man or woman, gives something to daughters, or to others related to them by any tie, who are living in the monastery, whether clothing or anything else counted among necessities, it should not be received secretly, but should be at the disposal of the prioress, so that, placed in the common store, it may be given to whoever needs it. But if anyone conceals something given to her, let her be condemned by the judgment for theft.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:8: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 13:5, 8, 13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.12 (CSEL 57:365–367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-12).

## Letter 211.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-13
- Source: CSEL 57:367–368
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine regulates the washing of clothes, monthly baths, care of the sick, going out in threes, and the duties of those who keep stores, clothes, and books.

### Latin text

Indumenta uestra secundum arbitrium praepositae lauentur siue a uobis siue a fullonibus, ne interiores animae sordes contrahat mundae uestis nimius appetitus. lauacrum etiam corporum ususque balnearum non sit assiduus. sed eo. quo solet, temporis interuallo tribuatur, hoc est semel in mense. cuius autem infirmitatis necessitas cogit lauandum corpus. non longius differatur; fiat sine murmure de consilio medicinae, ita ut, etiam si nolit, iubente praeposita faciat, quod faciendum est pro salute. si autem uelit et forte non expedit, suae cupiditati non oboediatur; aliquando enim, etiamsi noceat, prodesse creditur, quod delectat. denique, si latens est dolor in corpore famulae dei, dicenti, sibi quid doleat, sine dubitatione credatur; sed tamen, utrum sanando illi dolori, quod delectat, expediat, si non est certum, medicus consulatur. nec eant ad balneas siue quocumque ire necesse fuerit minus quam tres. nec illa, quae habet aliquo eundi necessitatem, cum quibus ipsa uoluerit, sed cum quibus praeposita iusserit, ire debebit. aegrotantium cura siue post aegritudinem reficiendarum siue aliqua imbecillitate etiam sine febribus laborantium alicui debet iniungi, ut ipsa de cellario petat, quod cuique opus esse perspexerit, siue autem quae cellario siue quae uestibus siue quae codicibus praeponuntur, sine murmure seruiant sororibus suis. codices certa hora singulis diebus petantur; extra horam quae petierint, non accipiant. uestimenta uero et calciamenta quando fuerint indigenti necessaria, dare non differant, sub quarum custodia sunt, quae poscuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let your clothes be washed, at the discretion of the prioress, either by yourselves or by the fullers, lest an excessive desire for clean clothing contract inner stains of the soul. Let the washing of the body too, and the use of the baths, not be constant, but be allowed at the usual interval of time, that is, once a month. But if the necessity of some illness requires the body to be washed, let it not be put off too long; let it be done without murmuring on medical advice, so that, even if she is unwilling, she does at the prioress's command what must be done for her health. But if she wishes it and perhaps it is not good for her, her desire should not be obeyed; for sometimes what gives pleasure is believed to do good even if it harms. Then, if there is a hidden pain in the body of a handmaid of God, let her be believed without hesitation when she says what pains her; but if it is not certain whether what pleases her is good for healing that pain, let a physician be consulted. And let them not go to the baths, or wherever it is necessary to go, fewer than three together. Nor should she who has need to go somewhere go with those she herself wishes, but with those the prioress commands. The care of the sick, or of those to be restored after illness, or of those suffering from some weakness even without fever, ought to be entrusted to someone, so that she herself may ask from the storeroom what she sees each one needs. And those who are in charge of the storeroom, or of the clothing, or of the books, should serve their sisters without murmuring. Let books be asked for at a fixed hour each day; those who ask outside that hour should not receive them. But clothing and shoes, when they are necessary for someone in need, those in whose keeping the things asked for are should not delay to give.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.13 (CSEL 57:367–368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-13).

## Letter 211.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-14
- Source: CSEL 57:368–369
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine directs the nuns to end quarrels quickly, ask and give forgiveness, avoid harsh words, and keep their love spiritual rather than carnal.

### Latin text

Lites aut nullas habeatis aut quam celerrime finiatis, ne ira crescat in odium et trabem faciat de festuca et animam faciat homicidam. neque enim ad solos uiros pertinet, quod scriptum est: Qui odit fratrem suum, homicida est, sed sexu masculino, quem deus primum fecit, etiam femineus praeceptum sexus accepit. quaecumque uel conuicio uel maledicto uel etiam criminis obiectu alteram laeserit, meminerit satisfactione curare quantocius, quod fecit, et illa, quae laesa est, sine disceptatione dimittere. si autem inuicem se laeserunt, inuicem sibi debita relaxare debebunt propter orationes uestras, quas utique quanto crebriores tanto sanctiores habere debetis. melior est enim, quae quamuis ira saepe temptatur, tamen impetrare festinat, ut sibi dimittat, cui se fecisse cognoscit iniuriam, quam quae tardius irascitur et ad ueniam petendam difficilius inclinatur. quae non uult dimittere sorori, non speret accipere orationis effectum; quae autem numquam uult petere ueniam aut non ex animo petit, sine causa est in monasterio, etiamsi non inde proiciatur. proinde uobis a uerbis durioribus parcite; quae si emissa fuerint de ore uestro, non pigeat ex ipso ore proferre medicamenta, ex quo facta sunt uulnera. quando autem necessitas disciplinae minoribus cohercendis dicere uos uerba dura compellit. si etiam in ipsis modum uos excessisse sentitis, non a uobis exigitur, ut ab eis ueniam postuletis, ne apud eas, quas oportet esse subiectas, dum nimia seruatur humilitas, regendi frangatur auctoritas. sed tamen petenda est uenia ab omnium domino, qui nouit, etiam eas, quas plus iusto forte corripitis, quanta beniuolentia diligatis. non autem carnalis sed spiritalis inter uos debet esse dilectio; nam quae faciunt pudoris inmemores etiam feminis feminae iocando turpiter et ludendo, non solum a uiduis et intactis ancillis Christi in sancto proposito constitutis sed omnino nec a mulieribus nuptis nec a uirginibus sunt facienda nupturis.

### English translation (Claude)

Have no quarrels, or end them as quickly as possible, lest anger grow into hatred, make a beam out of a splinter, and make the soul a murderer. For what is written, “He who hates his brother is a murderer,” does not apply to men alone; but with the male sex, which God made first, the female sex too received the commandment. Whoever has hurt another by insult or abuse or even by charging her with a crime should remember to heal what she has done by making amends as quickly as possible, and the one who was hurt should forgive without argument. But if they have hurt each other, they must forgive each other's debts, for the sake of your prayers, which you ought certainly to keep the holier, the more frequent they are. For she is better who, though often tempted by anger, still hastens to ask forgiveness from the one she knows she has wronged, than she who is slower to anger and harder to bring to ask pardon. She who does not wish to forgive her sister should not hope to receive the fruit of prayer; but she who never wishes to ask pardon, or does not ask it from the heart, is in the monastery without reason, even if she is not expelled from it. So spare yourselves harsh words; and if they have come out of your mouth, do not be ashamed to bring forth healing from the same mouth that made the wounds. But when the necessity of discipline compels you to speak harsh words in restraining those under you, even if you feel that you have gone too far in them, it is not required of you to ask their pardon, lest, by keeping too much humility toward those who ought to be subject, the authority of governing be broken. Yet pardon must be asked of the Lord of all, who knows with how much goodwill you love even those whom you perhaps rebuke more than is just. But the love among you ought not to be carnal but spiritual; for the things that women forgetful of modesty do even with women, in base jesting and play, ought not to be done not only by widows and untouched handmaids of Christ established in a holy purpose, but not at all even by married women or by maidens who are to marry.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:3–5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 John 3:15: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:14–15: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 7:3–5; 1 John 3:15; Matt 6:12, 14–15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.14 (CSEL 57:368–369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-14).

## Letter 211.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-15
- Source: CSEL 57:369–370
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine directs the nuns to obey the prioress and the presbyter, and describes the prioress as one who serves in love and must give account to God.

### Latin text

Praepositae tamquam matri oboediatur honore seruato. ne in illa offendatur deus, multo magis presbytero, qui omnium uestrum curam gerit. ut ergo cuncta ista seruentur et. si quid seruatum non fuerit, non neglegenter praetereatur, sed emendandum corrigendumque curetur, ad praepositam praecipue pertinet, ita ut ad presbyterum, qui uobis intendit, referat, quod modum uel uires eius excedit. ipsa uero non se existimet potestate dominante sed caritate seruiente felicem. honore coram hominibus praelata sit uobis, coram deo substrata sit pedibus uestris. circa omnes bonorum operum se ipsam praebeat exemplum. corripiat inquietas, consoletur pusillanimes, suscipiat infirmas, patiens sit ad omnes; disciplinam libens habeat, metuens inponat. et quamuis utrumque sit necessarium, tamen plus a uobis amari appetat quam timeri semper cogitans deo se pro nobis reddituram esse rationem. unde magis oboediendo non solum uestri uerum etiam ipsius miseremini, quia inter uos quanto in loco superiore tanto in periculo maiore uersatur.

### English translation (Claude)

Let the prioress be obeyed as a mother, with due honor, lest God be offended in her; much more the presbyter, who has the care of you all. So, that all these things may be observed, and that, if anything has not been observed, it may not be negligently passed over but seen to be amended and corrected, belongs above all to the prioress; so that she refers to the presbyter, who watches over you, whatever exceeds her measure or strength. But let her not think herself happy in power that dominates but in love that serves. In honor before men let her be set over you; before God let her lie beneath your feet. Toward all let her show herself an example of good works. Let her rebuke the restless, comfort the faint-hearted, support the weak, be patient toward all; let her keep discipline willingly and impose it with fear. And although both are necessary, still let her seek rather to be loved by you than feared, always thinking that she will render account to God for you. Hence, by obeying more, have pity not only on yourselves but also on her, because among you, the higher her place, the greater her danger.

### Scripture references

- Titus 2:7: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:14: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 13:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Titus 2:7; 1 Thess 5:14; Heb 13:17. Other texts of the Rule read “in fear before God” (timore coram deo); the digital text has no word for “fear” here.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.15 (CSEL 57:369–370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-15).

## Letter 211.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-16
- Source: CSEL 57:370–371
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes the rule, asking that it be read weekly as a mirror for self-examination.

### Latin text

Donet dominus. ut obseruetis haec omnia cum dilectione tamquam spiritalis pulchritudinis amatrices et bono odore Christi de bona conuersatione fraglantes non sicut ancillae sub lege sed sicut liberae sub gratia constitutae. ut autem in hoc libello tamquam in speculo uos possitis inspicere, ne per obliuionem aliquid neglegatis, semel in septimana uobis legatur et, ubi uos inueneritis ea, quae scripta sunt, facientes, agite gratias domino bonorum omnium largitori; ubi autem quaecumque uestrum uidet sibi deesse aliquid, de praeterito doleat, caueat de futuro orans, ut et debitum dimittatur et in temptationem non inducatur.

### English translation (Claude)

May the Lord grant that you observe all these things with love, as lovers of spiritual beauty and fragrant with the good odor of Christ from your good way of life, not as handmaids under the law but as free women established under grace. And so that you may look at yourselves in this little book as in a mirror, and not neglect anything through forgetfulness, let it be read to you once a week; and where you find yourselves doing what is written, give thanks to the Lord, the giver of all good things; but where any one of you sees that she lacks something, let her grieve for the past and guard against the future, praying that her debt may be forgiven and that she may not be led into temptation.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 2:15: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 6:14: allusion, high confidence
- Jas 1:23–25: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 6:12–13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 2:15; Rom 6:14; Jas 1:23–25; Matt 6:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 211.16 (CSEL 57:370–371; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-211-16).

## Letter 212.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-212-1
- Source: CSEL 57:371–372
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends the widow Galla and her daughter, the virgin Simpliciola, to Bishop Quintilian, noting that they carry relics of the martyr Stephen.

### Latin text

Honorabiles dei famulas et praecipua membra Christi, Gallam uiduam sancti propositi et eius filiam Simpliciolam uirginem sacram matri aetate subditam, sanctitate praelatam, quas uerbo domini aluimus, ut potuimus, uenerationi tuae in Christi dilectione commendo et tamquam mea manu per hanc epistulam trado consolandas et in omnibus adiuuandas, quae utilitas earum uel necessitas postulat. quod et sine mea commendatione procul dubio faceret sanctitas tua. si enim nos propter supernam Hierusalem, cuius nos omnes ciues sumus et in qua concupierunt habere excellentioris sanctitatis locum, non solum ciuicum uerum etiam fraternum eis debemus affectum, quanto magis uos, apud quos earum etiam carnalis est patria, in qua saecularem nobilitatem pro Christi amore contemnunt dominae illae! officium quoque salutationis per illas meum ea caritate peto digneris sumere, qua direxi, et meminisse nostri in orationibus tuis. portant sane secum reliquias beatissimi et gloriosissimi martyris Stephani, quas non ignorat sanctitas uestra, sicut et nos fecimus, quam conuenienter honorare debeatis.

### English translation (Claude)

I commend to Your Reverence, in the love of Christ, the honorable handmaids of God and eminent members of Christ, Galla, a widow under holy vows, and her daughter Simpliciola, a consecrated virgin, subject to her mother in age but above her in holiness, whom we have nourished with the word of the Lord as best we could; and by this letter, as though with my own hand, I hand them over to you to be comforted and helped in everything their benefit or need requires. Your Holiness would no doubt do this even without my commendation. For if we, for the sake of the heavenly Jerusalem, of which we are all citizens and in which they have desired to have a place of more excellent holiness, owe them not only a citizen's but also a brother's affection, how much more do you, among whom is also their earthly homeland, in which those ladies despise worldly nobility for the love of Christ! I ask you also to be good enough to receive my greeting through them in the same love with which I send it, and to remember us in your prayers. They are carrying with them relics of the most blessed and glorious martyr Stephen; Your Holiness is not unaware, as we have done, how fittingly you ought to honor them.

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:26: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 12:22: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Quintilian, a bishop. Gal 4:26; Heb 12:22. The relics of Stephen, discovered in 415, were widely venerated in Africa.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 212.1 (CSEL 57:371–372; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/211-1/#p-212-1).

## Letter 213.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-1
- Source: CSEL 57:372–375
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The official record of 26 September 426 at Hippo, in which Augustine, now old, names the presbyter Eraclius as his successor before clergy and people, who acclaim him.

### Latin text

Gloriosissimo Theodosio duodecies et Valentiniano Augusto iterum consule VI KI Octb, cum Augustinus episcopus una cum Religiano et Martiniano coepiscopis suis consedisset in ecclesia pacis Hipponiensium Regiorum praesentibus Saturnino, Leporio, Barnaba, Fortunatiano, Rustico, Lazaro et Eraclio presbyteris, adstanti clero et frequenti populo Augustinus episcopus dixit: Quod hesterno die promisi caritati uestrae, propter quod uos uolui frequentius conuenire et uideo frequentius conuenisse, mora omni postposita hoc agendum est. si enim aliud uelim loqui, in illud suspensi minus auditis. omnes in hac uita mortales sumus et dies huius uitae ultimus omni homini est semper incertus. uerum tamen in infantia speratur pueritia et in pueritia speratur adulescentia et in adulescentia speratur iuuentus et in iuuentute speratur grauitas et in grauitate speratur senectus. utrum contingat, incertum est; est tamen, quod speretur. senectus autem aliam aetatem, quam speret, non habet. incertum est enim, ipsa senectus quam diu sit homini; illud tamen certum est, nullam remanere aetatem, quae possit succedere senectuti. quia uoluit deus, ad istam ciuitatem cum uigore aetatis adueni; sed tamen iuuenis fui et senui. scio post obitus episcoporum per ambitiosos aut contentiosos solere ecclesias perturbari et, quod saepe sum expertus et dolui, debeo, quantum ad me adtinet, ne contingat, huic prospicere ciuitati. sicut nouit caritas uestra, in Mileuitana ecclesia modo fui; petierunt enim me fratres et maxime serui dei, qui ibi sunt, ut uenirem, quia post obitum beatae memoriae fratris coepiscopi mei Seueri nonnulla ibi perturbatio timebatur. ueni et, quo modo uoluit, deus adiuuit nos per suam misericordiam: acceperunt episcopum, quem uiuus designauerat episcopus eorum. hoc enim eis cum innotuisset, uoluntatem praecedentis episcopi sui libenter amplexi sunt. minus tamen aliquid factum erat, unde nonnulli contristabantur, quia frater Seuerus credidit posse sufficere, ut successorem suum apud clericos designaret; ad populum inde non est locutus. et erat inde aliquorum nonnulla tristitia. quid plura? deo placuit, fugata est tristitia, gaudium successit, ordinatus est episcopus, quem praecedens episcopus designauerat. ergo, ne aliquis de me queratur, uoluntatem meam, quam credo dei esse, in omnium uestrum notitiam perfero: presbyterum Eraclium mihi successorem uolo. a populo adclamatum est: Deo gratias, Christo laudes — dictum est uicies terties —; exaudi, Christe, Augustino uita — dictum est sexies decies -; te patrem, te episcopum — dictum est octies.

### English translation (Claude)

In the consulship of the most glorious Theodosius for the twelfth time and Valentinian Augustus for the second, on the sixth day before the Kalends of October, when Bishop Augustine had taken his seat together with his fellow bishops Religianus and Martinianus in the Church of Peace at Hippo Regius, in the presence of the presbyters Saturninus, Leporius, Barnabas, Fortunatianus, Rusticus, Lazarus, and Eraclius, with the clergy standing by and a large crowd of people, Bishop Augustine said: “What I promised Your Charity yesterday, the reason I wished you to assemble in larger numbers, and I see that you have assembled in larger numbers, must be done without any delay. For if I wished to speak of something else, you would listen less well, being in suspense about that. In this life we are all mortal, and the last day of this life is always uncertain for every human being. Yet in infancy childhood is hoped for, and in childhood adolescence, and in adolescence youth, and in youth mature age, and in mature age old age. Whether it will come is uncertain; still, there is something to be hoped for. But old age has no other age to hope for. For it is uncertain how long old age itself will last for a man; but this is certain, that no age remains that can succeed old age. As God willed, I came to this city in the vigor of my age; but I was young and I have grown old. I know that after the deaths of bishops churches are often disturbed by ambitious or contentious men, and what I have often experienced and grieved over, I ought, as far as it concerns me, to provide against happening to this city. As Your Charity knows, I was recently in the church of Milevis; for the brothers, and especially the servants of God who are there, asked me to come, because after the death of my brother and fellow bishop Severus, of blessed memory, some disturbance there was feared. I came, and, as he willed, God helped us by his mercy: they accepted the bishop whom their bishop had designated while alive. For when this became known to them, they willingly embraced the wish of their previous bishop. Yet something had been done short of what was needed, at which some were saddened, because brother Severus thought it could suffice to designate his successor before the clergy; he did not speak to the people about it. And there was some sadness among some people because of this. What more? It pleased God; the sadness was put to flight, joy followed, and the bishop whom the previous bishop had designated was ordained. So, lest anyone should complain about me, I bring to the knowledge of you all my wish, which I believe is God's: I want the presbyter Eraclius as my successor.” The people acclaimed: “Thanks be to God! Praise to Christ!” (said twenty-three times). “Hear us, Christ! Long life to Augustine!” (said sixteen times). “You our father, you our bishop!” (said eight times).

### Scripture references

- Ps 37:25 (36:25 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter 213 is the ecclesiastical record (gesta) of the assembly; the date is 26 September 426. Ps 37:25 (“I was young and have grown old”). The repeated acclamations, with their counts, are recorded as in the minutes.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.1 (CSEL 57:372–375; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-1).

## Letter 213.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-2
- Source: CSEL 57:375–376
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the people to pray that God confirm the choice of Eraclius and notes that the proceedings are being officially recorded.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Non opus est me de laudibus eius aliquid dicere; faueo sapientiae et parco uerecundiae; sufficit, quia nostis eum; et hoc me uelle dico, quod uos uelle scio et, si ante nescirem, hodie probarem. hoc ergo uolo, hoc a domino deo nostro etiam in aetate frigida uotis feruentibus posco, hoc ut mecum oretis, exhortor, admoneo, rogo, ut omnium in pace Christi conlatis et conflatis mentibus confirmet deus, quod operatus est in nobis. qui misit mihi eum, seruet eum, seruet incolumem, seruet sine crimine, ut, qui facit gaudium uiuentis, suppleat locum morientis. a notariis ecclesiae, sicut cernitis, excipiuntur, quae dicimus, excipiuntur, quae dicitis; et meus sermo et uestrae adclamationes in terram non cadunt. apertius ut dicam, ecclesiastica nunc gesta conficimus; sic enim hoc esse, quantum ad homines adtinet, confirmatum uolo. a populo adclamatum est: Deo gratias, Christo laudes — dictum est tricies sexies —; exaudi, Christe, Augustino uita — dictum est tredecies —; te patrem, te episcopum — dictum est octies —; dignum et iustum est — dictum est uicies —; bene meritus, bene dignus — dictum est quinquies —; dignum et iustum est — dictum est sexies.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “There is no need for me to say anything in his praise; I respect his wisdom and spare his modesty; it is enough that you know him. And I say that I want what I know you want, and if I had not known it before, I would have proved it today. This, then, is what I want, this I ask of the Lord our God with fervent prayers even in my cold old age; this I exhort, admonish, and ask you to pray for with me: that God may confirm what he has wrought in us, with the minds of all brought together and fused in the peace of Christ. May he who sent him to me keep him, keep him safe, keep him without crime, so that he who gives me joy while I live may fill my place when I die. As you see, what we say is being taken down by the church's secretaries, and what you say is being taken down; neither my words nor your acclamations fall to the ground. To speak more plainly, we are now drawing up official church records; for I want this to be confirmed in this way, as far as human beings are concerned.” The people acclaimed: “Thanks be to God! Praise to Christ!” (said thirty-six times). “Hear us, Christ! Long life to Augustine!” (said thirteen times). “You our father, you our bishop!” (said eight times). “It is worthy and just!” (said twenty times). “Well deserving, well worthy!” (said five times). “It is worthy and just!” (said six times).

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:28 (67:29 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Phil 1:6; Ps 68:28 (“confirm, O God, what you have wrought in us”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.2 (CSEL 57:375–376; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-2).

## Letter 213.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-3
- Source: CSEL 57:376
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks for the decision to be confirmed by the record and by prayer, and the people acclaim Eraclius as their future bishop.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Ergo, ut dicebam, uoluntatem meam et uoluntatem uestram gestis ecclesiasticis, quantum ad homines adtinet, confirmatam uolo: quantum uero ad latentem omnipotentis uoluntatem, omnes, ut dixi, oremus, ut confirmet deus, quod operatur in nobis. a populo adclamatum est: Iudicio tuo gratias agimus — dictum est sedecies —; fiat, fiat — dictum est duodecies —; te patrem, Eraclium episcopum — dictum est sexies.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “So, as I was saying, I want my will and your will confirmed by the church records, as far as human beings are concerned; but as for the hidden will of the Almighty, let us all pray, as I said, that God may confirm what he is working in us.” The people acclaimed: “We give thanks for your judgment!” (said sixteen times). “So be it, so be it!” (said twelve times). “You our father, Eraclius our bishop!” (said six times).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.3 (CSEL 57:376; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-3).

## Letter 213.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-4
- Source: CSEL 57:376
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Eraclius will not be ordained bishop during his lifetime, since his own ordination as co-bishop with Valerius had broken a canon of Nicaea.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Scio, quod scitis et uos, sed nolo de illo fieri, quod de me factum est. quid autem factum sit, multi scitis; illi soli nesciunt, qui tunc aut nondum erant nati aut nondum habebant aetatem sciendi. adhuc in corpore posito beatae memoriae patre et episcopo meo sene Valerio episcopus ordinatus sum et sedi cum illo, quod concilio Nicaeno prohibitum fuisse nesciebam nec ipse sciebat. quod ergo reprehensum est in me, nolo reprehendi in filio meo. a populo adclamatum est: Deo gratias, Christo laudes — dictum est tredecies.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “I know what you also know, but I do not want done in his case what was done in mine. Many of you know what was done; only those do not know who then either were not yet born or were not yet old enough to know. While my father and bishop, the aged Valerius of blessed memory, was still in the body, I was ordained bishop and sat with him, which I did not know had been forbidden by the Council of Nicaea, nor did he know it. So what was found fault with in me I do not want found fault with in my son.” The people acclaimed: “Thanks be to God! Praise to Christ!” (said thirteen times).

### Translation notes

- Council of Nicaea, canon 8, forbids two bishops in one city.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.4 (CSEL 57:376; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-4).

## Letter 213.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-5
- Source: CSEL 57:376–377
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the people to bring their business to Eraclius instead of him, so that he may devote himself to the Scriptures, as councils had earlier asked.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Erit presbyter, ut est, quando deus uoluerit, futurus episcopus. sed plane modo facturus sum adiuuante misericordia dei, quod adhuc usque non feci. nostis, ante aliquot annos quod facere uoluerim, et non permisistis. placuit mihi et uobis propter curam scripturarum, quam mihi fratres et patres mei, coepiscopi mei, duobus conciliis Numidiae et Carthaginensi inponere dignati sunt, ut per quinque dies nemo mihi molestus esset. et gesta confecta sunt, placuit, adclamastis; recitatur placitum uestrum et adclamationes uestrae. paruo tempore seruatum est circa me; uiolenter inruptum est et non permittor, ad quod uolo, uacare. ante meridiem et post meridiem in occupationes hominum implicor. obsecro uos et constringo per Christum, ut huic iuueni, hoc est Eraclio presbytero, quem hodie in nomine Christi designo episcopum successorem mihi, patiamini refundere onera occupationum mearum. a populo adclamatum est: Iudicio tuo gratias agimus - dictum est uicies sexies.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “He will be a presbyter, as he is, and when God wills, he will be bishop. But now, with the help of God's mercy, I am certainly going to do what I have not done until now. You know what I wished to do some years ago, and you did not allow it. It was agreed by me and by you, because of the care of the Scriptures which my brothers and fathers, my fellow bishops, were good enough to lay on me at two councils, of Numidia and of Carthage, that no one should trouble me for five days. And records were drawn up; it was agreed; you acclaimed it; your agreement and your acclamations were read out. It was observed toward me for a short time; then it was violently broken in upon, and I am not allowed to have leisure for what I want. Before noon and after noon I am entangled in people's affairs. I beg you and adjure you by Christ to allow me to transfer the burdens of my affairs to this young man, that is, to the presbyter Eraclius, whom today in the name of Christ I designate as bishop, my successor.” The people acclaimed: “We give thanks for your judgment!” (said twenty-six times).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.5 (CSEL 57:376–377; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-5).

## Letter 213.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-6
- Source: CSEL 57:377–379
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine hands his routine duties to Eraclius so that he may give his remaining time to Scripture, and asks the people to sign the record, which they acclaim.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Ego caritati et beniuolentiae uestrae apud dominum deum nostrum gratias ago, immo de illa gratias ago. ergo, fratres, quicquid est, quod ad me feratur, ad illum perferatur. ubi necessarium fuerit consilium meum, non negabo; auxilium absit ut subtraham. tamen quicquid illud est, quod ad me ferebatur, ad illum perferatur. ipse me aut consulat, si forte non inuenit, quod facere debeat, aut poscat adiutorem, quem nouit patrem, ut et uobis nihil desit et ego tandem aliquando, si quantulumcumque spatium mihi donauerit deus, ipsamque meam quantulamcumque uitam non dem segnitiae nec donem inertiae, sed in sanctis scripturis, quantum ipse permittit et largitur, exerceam. hoc et ipsi proderit et per illum etiam uobis. nemo ergo inuideat otio meo, quia meum otium magnum habet negotium. uideo me de hac re, propter quam uos inuitaui, omnia uobiscum egisse, quae debui. hoc ad ultimum rogo, ut gestis istis dignemini subscribere, qui potestis. hic responsione uestra opus est; teneam responsionem uestram, de hac assensione aliquid adclamate. a populo adclamatum est: Fiat, fiat - dictum est uicies quinquies —; dignum et iustum est — dictum est uicies octies —; <fiat, fiat — dictum est quater decies —; olim dignus, olim meritus — dictum uicies quinquies —; iudicio tuo gratias agimus — dictum tredecies —; exaudi, Christe, Eraclium conserua — dictum est octies decies.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “I thank Your Charity and goodwill before the Lord our God; or rather, I give thanks for it. So, brothers, whatever used to be brought to me, let it be brought to him. Where my counsel is needed, I will not refuse it; far be it from me to withdraw my help. Still, whatever used to be brought to me, let it be brought to him. Let him consult me, if perhaps he does not find what he ought to do, or ask for help from one whom he knows as a father; so that nothing may be lacking to you, and I at last, if God grants me some little space of life, may not give that little life of mine to sloth or surrender it to idleness, but exercise it in the holy Scriptures, as far as he permits and grants. This will benefit him too, and through him you as well. So let no one begrudge me my leisure, for my leisure has great business. I see that I have done with you everything I ought on this matter for which I invited you. Finally, I ask that those of you who can be good enough to sign these records. Here your response is needed; let me have your response; acclaim something about this assent.” The people acclaimed: “So be it, so be it!” (said twenty-five times). “It is worthy and just!” (said twenty-eight times). “So be it, so be it!” (said fourteen times). “Long worthy, long deserving!” (said twenty-five times). “We give thanks for your judgment!” (said thirteen times). “Hear us, Christ! Keep Eraclius!” (said eighteen times).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.6 (CSEL 57:377–379; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-6).

## Letter 213.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-7
- Source: CSEL 57:379–380
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes the assembly by asking the people to turn to the Eucharist and pray for the church, for himself, and for Eraclius.

### Latin text

Cumque reticeretur, Augustinus episcopus dixit: Bene habet, ut ea, quae dei sunt, circa sacrificium eius agere ualeamus. in qua hora supplicationis nostrae maxime commendo caritati uestrae, ut omnes uestras causas et negotia intermittatis et pro ista ecclesia et pro me et pro Eraclio presbytero domino precem fundatis.

### English translation (Claude)

When there was silence, Bishop Augustine said: “It is well, so that we may be able to do the things of God concerning his sacrifice. In this hour of our supplication I especially commend to Your Charity that you set aside all your cases and business and pour out prayer to the Lord for this church, for me, and for the presbyter Eraclius.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 213.7 (CSEL 57:379–380; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-213-7).

## Letter 214.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-1
- Source: CSEL 57:380–381
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the monks of Hadrumetum, having heard that some deny free will and judgment according to works, and approves those who hold that grace helps free will.

### Latin text

Venerunt ad nos duo iuuenes, Cresconius et Felix, de uestra congregatione se esse dicentes, qui nobis rettulerunt monasterium uestrum nonnulla dissensione turbatum eo, quod quidam in uobis sic gratiam praedicent, ut negent hominis esse liberum arbitrium et, quod est grauius, dicant, quod in die iudicii non sit redditurus deus unicuique secundum opera eius. etiam hoc tamen indicauerunt, quod plures uestrum non ita sentiant, sed liberum arbitrium adiuuari fateantur per dei gratiam, ut recta sapiamus atque faciamus et, cum uenerit dominus reddere unicuique secundum opera eius, inueniat opera nostra bona, quae praeparauit deus, ut in illis ambulemus. hoc qui sentiunt, bene sentiunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Two young men, Cresconius and Felix, came to us, saying that they were of your community, and they reported to us that your monastery was disturbed by some dissension, because some among you preach grace in such a way as to deny that man has free will, and, what is worse, say that on the day of judgment God will not render to each according to his works. Yet they also indicated that most of you do not think so, but confess that free will is helped by the grace of God, so that we may think and do what is right, and that when the Lord comes to render to each according to his works, he may find our works good, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them. Those who think this think rightly.

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:27: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:6: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Valentinus, abbot of Hadrumetum, and his monks (426/427). Matt 16:27 (Rom 2:6); Eph 2:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.1 (CSEL 57:380–381; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-1).

## Letter 214.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-2
- Source: CSEL 57:381–382
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the monks to agree, holding both grace, by which Christ saves the world, and free will, by which he judges it, while denying that anything good can be done without grace.

### Latin text

Obsecro itaque uos, fratres, sicut Corinthios obsecrauit apostolus, per nomen domini nostri Iesu Christi, ut id ipsum dicatis omnes et non sint in uobis schismata. primo enim dominus Iesus. sicut scriptum est in euangelio Iohannis apostoli, non uenit, ut iudicaret mundum. sed ut saluaretur mundus per ipsum; postea uero. sicut scribit apostolus Paulus, iudicabit deus mundum. quando uenturus est, sicut tota ecclesia in symbolo confitetur, iudicare uiuos et mortuos. si ergo non est dei gratia, quo modo saluat mundum? et si non est liberum arbitrium, quo modo iudicat mundum? proinde librum uel epistulam meam, quam secum ad nos supra dicti adtulerunt, secundum hanc fidem intellegite, ut neque negetis dei gratiam neque liberum arbitrium sic defendatis, ut a dei gratia separetis, tamquam sine illa uel cogitare aliquid uel agere secundum deum ulla ratione possimus, quod omnino non possumus. propter hoc enim dominus, cum de fructu iustitiae loqueretur, ait discipulis suis: Sine me nihil potestis facere.

### English translation (Claude)

So I beg you, brothers, as the apostle begged the Corinthians, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all say the same thing and that there be no schisms among you. For first the Lord Jesus, as is written in the gospel of the apostle John, did not come to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him; but afterward, as the apostle Paul writes, God will judge the world, when he comes, as the whole Church confesses in the creed, to judge the living and the dead. If, then, there is no grace of God, how does he save the world? And if there is no free will, how does he judge the world? Therefore understand my book or letter, which those mentioned above brought with them to us, according to this faith, so that you neither deny the grace of God nor so defend free will as to separate it from the grace of God, as though without it we could in any way think or do anything according to God, which we cannot do at all. For this is why the Lord, when he was speaking of the fruit of righteousness, said to his disciples: “Without me you can do nothing.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:10: quotation, high confidence
- John 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Tim 4:1: echo, medium confidence
- John 15:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 1:10; John 3:17; Rom 3:6; 2 Tim 4:1 (the creed); John 15:5. The book or letter is Augustine's Letter 194 to Sixtus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.2 (CSEL 57:381–382; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-2).

## Letter 214.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-3
- Source: CSEL 57:382–383
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that his letter to Sixtus opposed the Pelagian teaching that grace is given according to merit, since everything that distinguishes a person is received from God.

### Latin text

Unde supra dictam epistulam ad Sixtum presbyterum ecclesiae Romanae contra nouos haereticos Pelagianos noueritis esse conscriptam, qui dicunt gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari, ut, qui gloriatur, non in domino sed in se ipso glorietur, hoc est in homine, non in domino. quod prohibet apostolus dicens: Nemo glorietur in homine et alio loco: Qui gloriatur, inquit, in domino glorietur. illi uero haeretici se ipsos a se ipsis iustos fieri putantes, quasi hoc eis non deus dederit sed ipsi sibi, non utique in domino sed in semet ipsis gloriantur. talibus dicit apostolus: Quis enim te discernit? quod ideo dicit, quia de massa illius perditionis, quae facta est ex Adam, non discernit hominem, ut eum faciat uas in honorem non in contumeliam, nisi deus. sed quoniam homo carnalis et inaniter inflatus, cum audisset: Quis enim te discernit? posset respondere uel uoce uel cogitatione et dicere: Discernit me fides mea, discernit me oratio mea, discernit me iustitia mea, mox apostolus occurrit cogitationibus eius et dixit: Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? si autem et accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? sic enim gloriantur, quasi non acceperint, qui se a se ipsis iustificari putant ac per hoc in se ipsis non in domino gloriantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Know, then, that the letter mentioned above, to Sixtus, presbyter of the Roman church, was written against the new heretics, the Pelagians, who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits, so that he who boasts may boast not in the Lord but in himself, that is, in man, not in the Lord. This the apostle forbids, saying, “Let no one boast in man,” and in another place, “Let him who boasts boast in the Lord.” But those heretics, thinking that they are made righteous by themselves, as though God had not given this to them but they to themselves, certainly boast not in the Lord but in themselves. To such the apostle says, “For who makes you different?” He says this because no one but God distinguishes a person from the mass of perdition that was made from Adam, so as to make him a vessel for honor and not for dishonor. But since a carnal man, vainly puffed up, on hearing, “For who makes you different?” could answer in speech or in thought and say, “My faith makes me different, my prayer makes me different, my righteousness makes me different,” the apostle at once meets his thoughts and says: “What do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as though you had not received it?” For those boast as though they had not received who think they are justified by themselves, and so boast in themselves and not in the Lord.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 3:21; 1 Cor 1:31 (2 Cor 10:17); 1 Cor 4:7; Rom 9:21. Augustine's teaching on the “mass of perdition” is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.3 (CSEL 57:382–383; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-3).

## Letter 214.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-4
- Source: CSEL 57:383–384
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that good works, prayer, and faith are themselves gifts of God, so that grace precedes merit, though God will still crown good merit at the judgment.

### Latin text

Propter quod ego in hac epistula, quae ad uos peruenit, probaui per testimonia scripturarum sanctarum, quae ibi potestis inspicere, et bona opera nostra et pias orationes et rectam fidem nullo modo in nobis esse potuisse, nisi haec acciperemus ab illo, de quo dicit apostolus Iacobus: Omne datum optimum et omne donum perfectum desursum est descendens a patre luminum, ne quisquam dicat meritis operum suorum uel meritis orationum suarum uel meritis fidei suae sibi traditam dei gratiam et putetur uerum esse, quod illi haeretici dicunt, gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari, quod omnino falsissimum est, non quia nullum est meritum uel bonum piorum uel malum impiorum - alioquin quo modo iudicabit deus mundum? —, sed misericordia et gratia dei conuertit hominem, de qua psalmus dicit: Deus meus, misericordia eius praeueniet me, ut iustificetur impius, hoc est ex impio fiat iustus et incipiat habere meritum bonum, quod dominus coronabit, quando iudicabitur mundus.

### English translation (Claude)

For this reason, in this letter that has come to you, I proved by testimonies of the holy Scriptures, which you can examine there, that neither our good works nor our devout prayers nor our right faith could in any way be in us unless we received them from him of whom the apostle James says, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights,” so that no one may say that the grace of God was given him for the merits of his works, or the merits of his prayers, or the merits of his faith, and what those heretics say be thought true, that the grace of God is given according to our merits, which is altogether most false. Not that there is no merit, either good of the godly or evil of the ungodly (otherwise how will God judge the world?), but the mercy and grace of God converts a person, of which the psalm says, “My God, his mercy will go before me,” so that the ungodly may be justified, that is, from ungodly may become righteous and begin to have good merit, which the Lord will crown when the world is judged.

### Scripture references

- Jas 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 59:10 (58:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 4:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jas 1:17; Rom 3:6; Ps 59:10; Rom 4:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.4 (CSEL 57:383–384; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-4).

## Letter 214.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-5
- Source: CSEL 57:384–385
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the monks' haste to return for Easter prevented him from sending fuller documents on the councils against the Pelagians.

### Latin text

Multa erant, quae uobis mittere cupiebam, quibus lectis totam ipsam causam, quae conciliis episcopalibus acta est aduersus eosdem Pelagianos haereticos, diligentius et plenius nosse possetis, sed festinauerunt fratres, qui ex numero uestro ad nos uenerant, per quos uobis non rescripsimus ista, sed scripsimus, nullas enim ad nos uestrae caritatis litteras adtulerant; tamen suscepimus eos, quoniam simplicitas eorum satis indicabat nihil illos nobis potuisse confingere. ideo autem festinauerunt, ut apud uos agerent pascha, quo possit adiuuante domino tam sanctus dies uestram pacem quam dissensionem potius inuenire.

### English translation (Claude)

There were many things I wanted to send you, by reading which you could learn more carefully and fully the whole case that was conducted in councils of bishops against these same Pelagian heretics; but the brothers of your number who had come to us were in a hurry, and by them we have not written this in reply, but simply written, for they had brought us no letter from Your Charity. Yet we received them, since their simplicity showed clearly enough that they could not have invented anything to us. And they hurried so as to celebrate Easter with you, so that with the Lord's help so holy a day might find your peace rather than your dissension.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.5 (CSEL 57:384–385; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-5).

## Letter 214.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-6
- Source: CSEL 57:385–386
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks that the monk who caused the disturbance be sent to him, noting that Paul's teaching on grace was misunderstood even in apostolic times.

### Latin text

Melius autem facietis, quod multum rogo, si ipsum, a quo dicunt se fuisse turbatos, ad me mittere non grauemini. aut enim non intellegit librum meum aut forte ipse non intellegitur. quando difficillimam quaestionem et paucis intellegibilem soluere atque enodare conatur. ipsa est enim quaestio de gratia dei, quae fecit, ut homines non intellegentes putarent apostolum Paulum dicere: Faciamus mala, ut ueniant bona. unde apostolus Petrus in secunda epistula sua: Quapropter, inquit, carissimi, haec expectantes satis agite inuiolati et inmaculati apud eum reperiri in pace et domini nostri patientiam salutem existimate, sicut et dilectissimus frater noster Paulus secundum eam, quae data est ei, sapientiam scripsit uobis ut et in omnibus epistulis loquens in eis de his. in quibus sunt quaedam difficilia intellectu, quae indocti et instabiles homines peruertunt sicut et ceteras scripturas ad proprium suum interitum.

### English translation (Claude)

But you will do better, and I ask it earnestly, if you do not mind sending to me the man by whom they say they were disturbed. For either he does not understand my book, or perhaps he is not understood himself when he tries to solve and unravel a most difficult question, understood by few. For it is the very question of the grace of God that made people who did not understand think that the apostle Paul was saying, “Let us do evil that good may come.” Hence the apostle Peter in his second letter says: “Therefore, beloved, since you are waiting for these things, be diligent to be found by him unblemished and spotless in peace; and count the patience of our Lord as salvation, as also our most beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which there are some things hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.”

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Pet 3:14–16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 3:8; 2 Pet 3:14–16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.6 (CSEL 57:385–386; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-6).

## Letter 214.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-7
- Source: CSEL 57:386–387
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the monks to believe in both free will and grace, showing from Scripture that even understanding is commanded of the will yet given by God.

### Latin text

Cauete ergo, quod tantus apostolus tam terribiliter dicit, et, ubi sentitis non uos intellegere, interim credite diuinis eloquiis. quia et liberum hominis est arbitrium et gratia dei, sine cuius adiutorio liberum arbitrium nec conuerti potest ad deum nec proficere in deum, et, quod pie creditis, ut etiam sapienter intellegatis, orate. et ad hoc ipsum enim, id est ut sapienter intellegamus, est utique liberum arbitrium. nisi enim libero arbitrio intellegeremus atque saperemus, non nobis praeciperetur dicente scriptura: Intellegite ergo, qui insipientes estis populo, et stulti aliquando sapite. eo ipso quippe, quo praeceptum atque imperatum est. ut intellegamus atque sapiamus, oboedientiam nostram requirit, quae nulla potest esse sine libero arbitrio. sed si posset hoc ipsum sine adiutorio gratiae fieri per liberum arbitrium, ut intellegeremus atque saperemus. non diceretur deo: Da mihi intellectum, ut discam mandata tua, neque in euangelio scriptum esset: Tunc aperuit illis sensum, ut intellegerent scripturas, nec Iacobus apostolus diceret: Si quis autem uestrum indiget sapientia. postulet a deo. qui dat omnibus affluenter et non inproperat, et dabitur ei. potens est autem dominus, qui et uobis donet et nobis, ut de uestra pace et pia consensione nuntiis celerrimis gaudeamus. saluto uos non solum meo nomine sed etiam fratrum. qui mecum sunt, et rogo, ut pro nobis concorditer atque instanter oretis. sit uobiscum dominus. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

Beware, then, of what so great an apostle says so terribly; and where you perceive that you do not understand, meanwhile believe the divine words: that there is both free will in man and the grace of God, without whose help free will can neither be turned to God nor make progress toward God; and pray that what you devoutly believe you may also wisely understand. For free will certainly exists for this very thing too, that we may understand wisely. For unless we understood and were wise by free will, we would not be commanded, as Scripture says, “Understand, then, you who are foolish among the people; and you fools, be wise at last.” By the very fact that it is commanded and enjoined that we understand and be wise, it requires our obedience, which cannot exist without free will. But if this very thing, that we understand and be wise, could be done by free will without the help of grace, it would not be said to God, “Give me understanding, that I may learn your commandments”; nor would it be written in the gospel, “Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures”; nor would the apostle James say, “But if any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given him.” The Lord is able to grant to you, and to us, that we may rejoice at the speediest news of your peace and devout agreement. I greet you not only in my own name but also in that of the brothers who are with me, and I ask you to pray for us in concord and earnestly. The Lord be with you. Amen.

### Scripture references

- Ps 94:8 (93:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 119:73 (118:73 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Luke 24:45: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 94:8; Ps 119:73; Luke 24:45; Jas 1:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 214.7 (CSEL 57:386–387; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-214-7).

## Letter 215.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-1
- Source: CSEL 57:387–389
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the monks of Hadrumetum that grace is not given for merit, yet all who can use free will are judged by their works, while unbaptized infants are condemned for original sin alone.

### Latin text

Cresconium, Felicem et alium Felicem dei seruos, qui ex uestra congregatione ad nos uenerunt. nobiscum egisse pascha nouerit caritas uestra. quos ideo tenuimus aliquanto diutius, ut instructiores ad uos redirent aduersus nouos haereticos Pelagianos, in quorum errorem cadit, qui putat secundum aliqua merita humana dari gratiam dei, quae sola hominem liberat per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum. sed rursus qui putat, quando ad iudicium dominus uenerit, non iudicari hominem secundum opera sua, qui iam per aetatem uti potuit libero uoluntatis arbitrio, nihilo minus in errore est. soli enim paruuli, qui nondum habent opera propria uel bona uel mala, secundum solum originale peccatum damnabuntur, quibus per lauacrum regenerationis non subuenit gratia saluatoris. ceteri autem omnes, qui iam utentes libero arbitrio sua propria peccata originali peccato insuper addiderunt. si de potestate tenebrarum per gratiam dei non eruuntur nec transferuntur ad regnum Christi, non solum secundum originis uerum etiam secundum propriae uoluntatis merita iudicium reportabunt. boni uero etiam ipsi quidem secundum bonae uoluntatis suae merita praemium consequentur, sed etiam ipsam bonam uoluntatem per dei gratiam consecuti sunt. ac sic impletur, quod scriptum est: Ira et indignatio, tribulatio et angustia in omnem animam hominis operantis malum, Iudaei primum et Graeci; gloria autem et honor et pax omni operanti bonum, Iudaeo primum et Graeco

### English translation (Claude)

Your Charity should know that Cresconius, Felix, and another Felix, servants of God, who came to us from your community, celebrated Easter with us. We kept them somewhat longer so that they might return to you better instructed against the new heretics, the Pelagians, into whose error falls anyone who thinks that the grace of God, which alone frees man through our Lord Jesus Christ, is given according to some human merits. But again, anyone who thinks that, when the Lord comes to judgment, a person who was already old enough to use the free choice of the will is not judged according to his works is no less in error. For only little children, who do not yet have works of their own, either good or bad, will be condemned on account of original sin alone, if the grace of the Savior has not come to their aid through the bath of regeneration. But all the rest, who, already using free will, have added their own sins to original sin, if they are not rescued from the power of darkness by the grace of God and transferred to the kingdom of Christ, will receive judgment according to the merits not only of their origin but also of their own will. The good, for their part, will indeed obtain the reward according to the merits of their good will, but they obtained that very good will through the grace of God. And so what is written is fulfilled: “Wrath and indignation, tribulation and distress for every human soul that does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek; but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek.”

### Scripture references

- Titus 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- Col 1:13: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:9–10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Valentinus and the monks of Hadrumetum. Titus 3:5; Col 1:13; Rom 2:9–10. Augustine's statement on unbaptized infants is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.1 (CSEL 57:387–389; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-1).

## Letter 215.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-2
- Source: CSEL 57:389–390
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends the monks his book on grace and free will together with the African councils' letters and the popes' replies condemning Pelagianism.

### Latin text

De qua difficillima quaestione, hoc est de uoluntate et gratia non opus habui etiam in hac epistula diutius disputare, quoniam et aliam iam eis dederam tamquam citius redituris. et scripsi ad uos etiam librum, quem si adiuuante domino diligenter legeritis et uiuaciter intellexeritis, nullas existimo inter uos de hac re dissensiones ulterius iam futuras. portant autem secum et alia. quae nobis dirigenda esse credidimus, quibus cognoscatis, quem ad modum catholica ecclesia in dei misericordia Pelagianae haeresis uenena reppulerit. quod enim scriptum est ad papam Innocentium. Romanae urbis episcopum, de concilio prouinciae Carthaginensis et de concilio Numidiae et aliquanto diligentius a quinque episcopis et quae ipse ad tria ista rescripsit. item quod papae Zosimo de Africano concilio scriptum est eiusque rescriptum ad uniuersos totius orbis episcopos missum et quod posteriore concilio plenario totius Africae contra ipsum errorem breuiter constituimus et supra memoratum librum meum, quem modo ad uos scripsi, haec omnia et in praesentia legimus cum ipsis et per eos misimus uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

On this most difficult question, that is, of the will and grace, I had no need to argue at length in this letter too, since I had already given them another, as though they were to return sooner. And I have also written you a book, which, if with the Lord's help you read it carefully and understand it keenly, I think there will be no further dissensions among you on this matter. They also carry with them other documents that we believed should be sent, by which you may learn how the Catholic Church, in God's mercy, has repelled the poisons of the Pelagian heresy: namely, what was written to Pope Innocent, bishop of the city of Rome, from the council of the province of Carthage and from the council of Numidia, and somewhat more fully by five bishops, and what he himself wrote in reply to these three; likewise what was written to Pope Zosimus from the African council, and his reply sent to all the bishops of the whole world; and what we briefly decreed against that error at the later plenary council of all Africa; and the book of mine mentioned above, which I have just written to you. All these we both read with them in person and sent to you by them.

### Translation notes

- The book is On Grace and Free Will. The documents are Augustine's Letters 175–177 and 181–183 (to and from Innocent I), Zosimus's Tractoria, and the canons of the Council of Carthage of 418.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.2 (CSEL 57:389–390; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-2).

## Letter 215.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-3
- Source: CSEL 57:390
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reports reading with the monks Cyprian's On the Lord's Prayer and his own letter to Sixtus, both showing that good living and conversion are gifts of grace.

### Latin text

Legimus eis etiam librum beatissimi martyris Cypriani de oratione dominica et ostendimus, quem ad modum docuerit omnia, quae ad mores nostros pertinent, quibus recte uiuimus, a patre nostro, qui in caelis est, esse poscenda, ne de libero praesumentes arbitrio a diuina gratia decidamus. ubi etiam demonstrauimus, quo modo admonuerit idem gloriosissimus martyr etiam pro inimicis nostris. qui nondum in Christum crediderunt, nos, ut credant, orare debere, quod utique inaniter fieret, nisi ecclesia crederet etiam malas atque infideles hominum uoluntates per dei gratiam in bonum posse conuerti. sed hunc librum sancti Cypriani quia dixerunt etiam illic apud uos esse, non misimus. meam quoque epistulam ad Sixtum, Romanae ecclesiae presbyterum, datam; quam secum ad nos adtulerunt, legimus cum eis et ostendimus aduersus eos esse conscriptam, qui dicunt gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari, hoc est aduersus eosdem Pelagianos

### English translation (Claude)

We also read to them the book of the most blessed martyr Cyprian on the Lord's Prayer, and showed how he taught that everything belonging to our conduct, by which we live rightly, is to be asked of our Father who is in heaven, lest, presuming on free will, we fall from divine grace. There we also showed how the same most glorious martyr admonished us that we ought to pray even for our enemies who have not yet believed in Christ, that they may believe; which would certainly be done in vain unless the Church believed that even the evil and unbelieving wills of men can be turned to good by the grace of God. But we did not send this book of holy Cyprian, because they said that you have it there too. We also read with them my letter to Sixtus, presbyter of the Roman church, which they brought with them to us, and showed that it was written against those who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits, that is, against these same Pelagians.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:9: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 5:44: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Dom. or. 12–17 (On the Lord's Prayer): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cyprian, On the Lord's Prayer (De dominica oratione), especially 12–17; Augustine's Letter 194.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.3 (CSEL 57:390; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-3).

## Letter 215.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-4
- Source: CSEL 57:390–391
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the monks to hold the Catholic faith that neither denies free will nor credits it with any good apart from grace.

### Latin text

Quantum potuimus ergo, egimus cum istis et uestris et nostris fratribus, ut in fide sana catholica perseuerent, quae neque liberum arbitrium negat siue in uitam malam siue in bonam neque tantum ei tribuit, ut sine dei gratia ualeat aliquid, siue ut ex malo conuertatur in bonum siue ut in bonum perseueranter proficiat siue ut ad bonum sempiternum perueniat. ubi iam non timeat, ne deficiat. uos quoque, carissimi, etiam in hac epistula exhortor, quod nos omnes exhortatur apostolus. non plus sapere, quam oportet sapere, sed sapere ad temperantiam, sicut unicuique deus partitus est mensuram fidei.

### English translation (Claude)

As far as we could, then, we dealt with these brothers, both yours and ours, that they might persevere in the sound Catholic faith, which neither denies free will, whether for an evil life or a good one, nor attributes so much to it that it can do anything without the grace of God, whether to be converted from evil to good, or to make persevering progress in good, or to attain the everlasting good, where it no longer fears that it may fail. You too, dearest ones, I exhort in this letter as the apostle exhorts us all: not to think more highly than one ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, as God has assigned to each the measure of faith.

### Scripture references

- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 12:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.4 (CSEL 57:390–391; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-4).

## Letter 215.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-5
- Source: CSEL 57:391–392
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows from Proverbs 4 that Scripture both commands the will and promises that God will make its paths straight.

### Latin text

Adtendite, quid per Salomonem moneat spiritus sanctus: Rectos cursus, inquit. fac pedibus tuis et uias tuas dirige, ne declines in dexteram neque in sinistram. auerte autem pedem tuum a uia mala. uias enim, quae a dextris sunt, nouit deus; peruersae uero sunt, quae a sinistris sunt. ipse autem rectos faciet cursus tuos. itinera autem tua in pace producet. in his uerbis sanctae scripturae considerate, fratres, quia, si non esset liberum arbitrium, non diceretur: Rectos cursus fac pedibus tuis et uias tuas dirige, ne declines in dexteram neque in sinistram. et tamen, sine dei gratia si posset hoc fieri, non postea diceretur: Ipse autem rectos faciet cursus tuos et itinera tua in pace producet.

### English translation (Claude)

Attend to what the Holy Spirit warns through Solomon: “Make straight paths for your feet,” he says, “and direct your ways; do not turn aside to the right or to the left; turn your foot away from the evil way. For God knows the ways that are on the right, but those on the left are perverse. But he will make your paths straight, and will lead your journeys forward in peace.” In these words of holy Scripture, brothers, consider that, if there were no free will, it would not be said, “Make straight paths for your feet and direct your ways; do not turn aside to the right or to the left.” And yet, if this could be done without the grace of God, it would not be said afterward, “But he will make your paths straight and will lead your journeys forward in peace.”

### Scripture references

- Prov 4:26–27: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 4:26–27 (LXX, with the additional verse 27a–b).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.5 (CSEL 57:391–392; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-5).

## Letter 215.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-6
- Source: CSEL 57:392–393
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that God "knows" the right-hand ways because he made them, as good works prepared by him, while the wicked make their own left-hand ways.

### Latin text

Nolite ergo declinare in dexteram neque in sinistram, quamuis laudentur uiae, quae a dextris sunt, et uituperentur, quae sunt a sinistris. hoc est enim, propter quod addidit: Auerte autem pedem tuum a uia mala, hoc est a sinistra, quod manifestat in consequentibus dicens: Vias enim, quae a dextris sunt, nouit deus; peruersae autem sunt, quae a sinistris sunt. eas itaque uias ambulare debemus, quas nouit deus, de quibus in psalmo legitur: Nouit dominus uiam iustorum et uia impiorum peribit. hanc enim non nouit dominus, quia sinistra est, sicut dicturus est etiam illis ad sinistram constitutis: Non noui uos. quid est autem. quod ille non nouit, qui utique nouit omnia siue bona hominum siue mala? sed quid est: Non uos noui. nisi tales uos ego non feci? quem ad modum illud, quod dictum est de ipso domino Iesu Christo, quia non nouerat peccatum, quid est nisi non fecerat? ac per hoc, quod dictum est: Vias, quae a dextris sunt, nouit dominus, quo modo intellegendum est, nisi quia ipse fecit uias dextras, id est uias iustorum, quae sunt utique opera bona, quae praeparauit deus, sicut dicit apostolus, ut in illis ambulemus? uias autem sinistras peruersas. id est uias impiorum non utique nouit, quia non eas ipse fecit homini sed homo sibi. propter quod dicit: Odi autem ego peruersas uias malorum; ipsae sunt a sinistris.

### English translation (Claude)

Do not, then, turn aside to the right or to the left, although the ways on the right are praised and those on the left are blamed. For this is why he added, “Turn your foot away from the evil way,” that is, from the left, as he makes plain in what follows, saying, “For God knows the ways that are on the right, but those on the left are perverse.” We ought, then, to walk in those ways which God knows, of which we read in the psalm, “The Lord knows the way of the righteous, and the way of the ungodly will perish.” For this way the Lord does not know, because it is on the left, as he will also say to those set on the left, “I do not know you.” But what is it that he does not know, who certainly knows all things, both the good and the evil of men? What, then, does “I do not know you” mean, if not “I did not make you such”? Just as what was said of the Lord Jesus Christ himself, that he did not know sin, what does it mean if not that he had not committed it? And so how is the saying, “The Lord knows the ways that are on the right,” to be understood, if not that he himself made the right ways, that is, the ways of the righteous, which are certainly the good works which God prepared beforehand, as the apostle says, that we should walk in them? But the perverse left ways, that is, the ways of the ungodly, he certainly does not know, because he did not make them for man, but man made them for himself. Hence he says, “But I hate the perverse ways of the wicked; they are on the left.”

### Scripture references

- Prov 4:27: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 1:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:12: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:21: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 2:10: allusion, high confidence
- Prov 8:13: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 4:27; Ps 1:6; Matt 25:12 (cf. 25:41); 2 Cor 5:21; Eph 2:10; Prov 8:13 (with an Old Latin addition).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.6 (CSEL 57:392–393; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-6).

## Letter 215.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-7
- Source: CSEL 57:393–394
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that turning aside to the right means ascribing one's good works to oneself rather than to God.

### Latin text

Sed respondetur nobis: Cur ergo dixit: Ne declines in dextram neque in sinistram, cum potius dicere debuisse uideatur: Tene dextram et ne declines in sinistram". si bonae sunt uiae. quae a dextris sunt? cur, putamus. nisi quia ita sunt uiae bonae, quae a dextris sunt, ut in dextram tamen declinare non sit bonum? declinare quippe ille est intellegendus in dextram, qui bona ipsa opera, quae ad uias dextras pertinent, sibi uult adsignare non deo. et ideo, cum dixisset: Vias enim, quae a dextris sunt, nouit deus: peruersae autem sunt. quae a sinistris sunt, tamquam diceretur ei: Quo modo ergo non uis, ut declinemus ad dextram, secutus adiunxit: Ipse autem rectos faciet cursus tuos, itinera autem tua in pace producet. sic ergo intellege, quod tibi praeceptum est: Rectos cursus fac pedibus tuis et uias tuas dirige, ut noueris, cum hoc facis. a domino deo tibi praestari, ut hoc facias. et non declinabis ad dextram, quamuis ambules in uiis dextris, non confidens in uirtute tua; et ipse erit uirtus tua, qui rectos faciet cursus tuos et itinera tua in pace producet.

### English translation (Claude)

But we are answered: “Why, then, did he say, ‘Do not turn aside to the right or to the left,’ when he seems rather to have had to say, ‘Keep to the right and do not turn aside to the left,’ if the ways on the right are good?” Why, do we think, if not because the ways on the right are good in such a way that it is nevertheless not good to turn aside to the right? For he must be understood to turn aside to the right who wishes to ascribe to himself and not to God the very good works that belong to the right ways. And therefore, when he had said, “For God knows the ways that are on the right, but those on the left are perverse,” as though it were said to him, “How, then, do you not want us to turn aside to the right?” he went on to add, “But he will make your paths straight and will lead your journeys forward in peace.” So understand what was commanded you, “Make straight paths for your feet and direct your ways,” in such a way that you know that, when you do this, it is granted you by the Lord God to do it. And you will not turn aside to the right, although you walk in the right ways, not trusting in your own strength; and he will be your strength, who will make your paths straight and lead your journeys forward in peace.

### Scripture references

- Prov 4:27: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 18:1 (17:2 LXX): echo, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 4:27 (LXX); Ps 18:1 (“he will be your strength”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.7 (CSEL 57:393–394; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-7).

## Letter 215.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-8
- Source: CSEL 57:394–396
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that relying on one's own will turns aside to the right, while abusing grace as license turns aside to the left, and asks that the monk Florus be sent to him.

### Latin text

Quapropter, dilectissimi, quicumque dicit: Voluntas mea mihi sufficit ad facienda opera bona, declinat in dextram. sed rursus illi, qui putant bonam uitam esse deserendam, quando audiunt sic dei gratiam praedicari, ut credatur et intellegatur uoluntates hominum ipsa ex malis bonas facere, ipsa etiam. quas fecerit. custodire, et propterea dicunt: Faciamus mala, ut ueniant bona, in sinistram declinant ideo uobis dixi: Non declinetis in dextram neque in sinistram, hoc est nec sic defendatis liberum arbitrium, ut ei bona opera sine dei gratia tribuatis, nec sic defendatis gratiam, ut quasi de illa securi mala opera diligatis, quod ipsa gratia dei auertat a uobis. talium quippe uerba sibi proponens apostolus ait: Quid ergo dicemus? permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet? atque his uerbis hominum errantium et dei gratiam non intellegentium respondit, ut debuit, dicens: Absit; si enim mortui sumus peccato, quo modo uiuemus in eo? nihil dici potuit breuius et melius. quid enim nobis gratia dei utilius confert in hoc praesenti saeculo maligno, nisi ut moriamur peccato? ac per hoc ipsi gratiae inuenietur ingratus, qui propter illam uult uiuere in peccato, per quam morimur peccato. deus autem, qui diues est in misericordia, det uobis et sanum sapere. et usque in finem proficienter in bono proposito permanere. hoc pro uobis hoc pro nobis hoc pro omnibus, qui uos diligunt, et pro eis, qui uos oderunt, instanter in pace fraterna et uigilanter orate. deo uiuatis. Si quid de uobis mereor, ueniat ad me frater Florus.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, dearly beloved, whoever says, “My will is sufficient for me to do good works,” turns aside to the right. But again, those who think a good life should be abandoned when they hear the grace of God preached in such a way that it is believed and understood that grace itself makes men's wills good from evil, and itself keeps those it has made good, and who therefore say, “Let us do evil that good may come,” turn aside to the left. This is why I said to you, “Do not turn aside to the right or to the left”; that is, do not so defend free will as to attribute good works to it without the grace of God, nor so defend grace as to love evil works as though secure because of it; may the grace of God itself turn this away from you. For the apostle, setting before himself the words of such people, says: “What then shall we say? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?” And he answered these words of men who were in error and did not understand the grace of God as he ought, saying, “By no means! For if we have died to sin, how shall we live in it?” Nothing could be said more briefly or better. For what more useful thing does the grace of God confer on us in this present evil age than that we die to sin? And so he will be found ungrateful to grace itself who wishes to live in sin because of that grace by which we die to sin. But may God, who is rich in mercy, grant you both to think soundly and to remain to the end, making progress, in your good purpose. Pray for this, for yourselves, for us, for all who love you and for those who hate you, earnestly and watchfully in brotherly peace. May you live to God. If I deserve anything from you, let brother Florus come to me.

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:8: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 6:1–2: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 1:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Eph 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 3:8; Rom 6:1–2; Gal 1:4; Eph 2:4. Florus was the monk whose reading of Letter 194 had set off the dispute.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 215.8 (CSEL 57:394–396; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/213-1/#p-215-8).

## Letter 216.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-1
- Source: CSEL 57:396–397
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus, abbot of Hadrumetum, replies to Augustine with humble thanks for his letter and book, apologizing for the monks who had come to him without leave.

### Latin text

Venerabilia scripta et librum tuae sanctitatis ita tremebundo corde percepimus. ut. sicut beatus Helias, cum in speluncae limine staret, faciem suam gloria domini transeunte uelauit. ita nos obiurgatos oculos teximus, quia per rusticitatem fratrum nostrorum nostro iudicio erubuimus. quorum inordinata profectione tuam metuimus beatitudinem salutare. quia tempus loquendi et tempus tacendi, ne, dum per dubitantes et de ueritate fluctuantes scriberemus, de dictis sapientiae tuae, quae est sicut sapientia angeli dei, dubitare cum dubitantibus uideremur. non enim erat nobis necessarium interrogare de beatitudine et de sapientia tua, quae est nobis nota per domini gratiam. nam ad librum dulcissimae sanctitatis tuae ita sumus alacriter iucundati, ut, sicut apostoli dominum post resurrectionem prandentem secum non audebant interrogare, quis esset — sciebant enim, quia Iesus est —. ita et nos nec uoluimus nec ausi sumus interrogare de libro. utrum tuae sit sanctitatis, cum ipsa fidelis gratia, quae in eo liberaliter commendatur, nobis tuum esse, domine sancte papa, eloquiis uiuacissimis contestetur.

### English translation (Claude)

We received the venerable letter and the book of Your Holiness with such a trembling heart that, just as the blessed Elijah, when he stood at the entrance of the cave, veiled his face as the glory of the Lord passed by, so we covered our rebuked eyes, because through the boorishness of our brothers we blushed at our own judgment. Because of their disorderly departure we were afraid to greet Your Blessedness, since there is a time to speak and a time to be silent, lest, if we wrote through men who were doubting and wavering about the truth, we should seem to doubt, with the doubters, the words of your wisdom, which is like the wisdom of an angel of God. For we had no need to inquire about Your Blessedness and wisdom, which is known to us by the Lord's grace. For we were so eagerly delighted with the book of Your most sweet Holiness that, just as the apostles did not dare to ask the Lord, as he ate with them after the resurrection, who he was (for they knew it was Jesus), so we neither wished nor dared to ask about the book, whether it was by Your Holiness, since the very faithful grace that is generously commended in it testifies to us in most lively words that it is yours, holy lord pope.

### Scripture references

- 1 Kgs 19:13: allusion, high confidence
- Eccl 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Sam 14:20: allusion, high confidence
- John 21:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Valentinus, abbot of Hadrumetum, to Augustine (426/427); “pope” (papa) is an honorific for a bishop. 1 Kgs 19:13; Eccl 3:7; 2 Sam 14:20; John 21:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.1 (CSEL 57:396–397; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-1).

## Letter 216.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-2
- Source: CSEL 57:397–398
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus explains how a copy of Augustine's letter to Sixtus, brought by Florus, was read to unlearned monks without his knowledge and disturbed some of them.

### Latin text

Incipiamus autem, domine beatissime papa, ipsius ordinem perturbationis exponere. carissimus frater noster Florus, seruus paternitatis tuae, cum ad Uzalensem patriam fuisset suadente caritate profectus, eulogias monasterio inter ipsas suae ciuitatis moras de opusculis nobis tuae adtulit sanctitatis uno fratre Felice, qui ad tuam sanctitatem tarde post comites suos uenisse dinoscitur, eundem librum deuote dictante. uentum est ad monasterium cum eodem libello fratre Floro ad Carthaginem de Uzalensi ciuitate profecto. mihi non monstrato libro inperitis fratribus recitare coeperunt. qui quorundam non intellegentium corda commouit, quia et, cum diceret dominus: Qui non manducauerit carnem filii hominis neque biberit sanguinem eius. non habebit uitam in semet ipso, discesserunt, qui impie intellexerunt non culpa domini dicentis sed duritia impiissimi cordis.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us begin, most blessed lord pope, to set out the course of the disturbance itself. Our dearest brother Florus, the servant of Your Paternity, having set out, at the urging of love, to his home town of Uzalis, brought to the monastery, as blessings, during his stay in his city, some of the works of Your Holiness, one brother, Felix, who is known to have come to Your Holiness after his companions, devoutly dictating that same book. The book came to the monastery while brother Florus had set out from the city of Uzalis to Carthage. Without the book being shown to me, they began to read it aloud to unlearned brothers. It disturbed the hearts of some who did not understand; just as, when the Lord said, “He who does not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood will not have life in himself,” those who understood it impiously departed, not through the fault of the Lord who spoke but through the hardness of their most impious heart.

### Scripture references

- John 6:53: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:66: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 6:53, 66.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.2 (CSEL 57:397–398; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-2).

## Letter 216.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-3
- Source: CSEL 57:398–399
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus reports that five or so monks disputed the book, refused to wait for Bishop Evodius's explanation, and left for Hippo, after which peace returned.

### Latin text

Coeperunt memorati fratres, qui omnia subuerterunt, innocentum animas commouere mea paruitate penitus ignorante in tantum conuentus illorum murmurantis nescii, ut, nisi frater Florus de Carthagine repedans eorum perturbationes agnoscens mihi sollicite nuntiasset............................. furtiua et tamquam seruilis erat inter eos de non intellegenda ueritate contentio. proposui ad auferendas impias quaestiones. ut ad dominum sanctum patrem Euodium mitteremus, ut ipse nobis de hoc sacrosancto libro propter ignaros aliquid certius rescripsisset. nec hoc accipere patientius noluerunt, sed arripuerunt profectionem nobis taliter non optatam fratre Floro furore illorum propemodum conturbato, in quem saeuiebant, quia ipse illis, ut putabant. uulnera libri huius adtulisset, in quo medicinam non poterant infirmi cognoscere. unde et sanctum presbyterum Sabinum ad maiorem auctoritatem rogauimus et ipsius sanctitas librum cum liquidis interpretationibus legit. nec sic anima sauciata curata est. quibus propter ipsam pietatem sumptus dedimus, ne uulnera ipsorum cumularemus. quae posset sanare libri ipsius gratia, in qua refulget tua sancta praesentia. quibus profectis quies et pax per omnes fratres exultauit in domino. quinque enim uel eo amplius fratrum animositate ista est innata contentio.

### English translation (Claude)

The brothers mentioned, who overturned everything, began to disturb the souls of the innocent, my littleness being utterly unaware, so far was I ignorant of their murmuring gatherings, that, had not brother Florus, returning from Carthage and recognizing their disturbances, anxiously told me … there was a stealthy and, as it were, servile dispute among them about the truth they did not understand. To remove these impious questions, I proposed that we should send to the holy father, lord Evodius, so that he might write back to us something more certain about this most sacred book, for the sake of the unlearned. They would not accept even this patiently, but seized on a departure we did not at all wish, brother Florus being almost overwhelmed by their fury; they raged against him because, as they thought, he had brought them the wounds of this book, in which, being sick, they could not recognize the medicine. Hence we also asked the holy presbyter Sabinus, for greater authority, and His Holiness read the book with clear explanations. Not even so was the wounded soul cured. Out of that very devotion we gave them their expenses, so as not to add to their wounds, which the grace of the book itself, in which your holy presence shines, could heal. When they had left, quiet and peace rejoiced in the Lord among all the brothers. For this dispute arose from the animosity of five brothers or a few more.

### Translation notes

- The digital text marks a gap after “told me”; it is not filled. Evodius was bishop of Uzalis.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.3 (CSEL 57:398–399; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-3).

## Letter 216.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-4
- Source: CSEL 57:399–400
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus professes the monastery's faith that grace heals the free will now, while at the judgment God will reward each according to works, a faith he says Florus also holds.

### Latin text

Sed quia interdum, domine papa, prouenit gaudium ex tristitia, non adeo maestificamur, quia per ignaros et curiosos suauissimis monitionibus tuae sanctitatis inluminari meruimus. nam et dubitatio beati Thomae apostoli foramina clauorum quaerentis confirmatio fuit ecclesiae uniuersalis. accepimus ergo. domine papa, medicamentum pie curantium tuarum cum gratia litterarum et contudimus pectora nostra, ut saltem sic sanetur conscientia nostra, quam per liberum arbitrium nostrum, quod donat misericordia, curat et uiuificat gratia sed in hoc tempore, quando adhuc misericordiam cum dilatione cantamus. nam cum coeperimus iudicium cantare domino, reportaturi sumus mercedem pro opere nostro, quia misericors et iustus dominus, miserator et rectus; quia, sicut docet nos sanctitas tua, repraesentari nos oportet ante tribunal Christi, ut recipiat unusquisque nostrum propria corporis, prout gessit siue bonum siue malum: quia ueniet dominus et merces eius cum ipso. quia stabit homo et opus eius ante ipsum; quia ueniet dominus sicut clibanus ardens, ut incendat impios tamquam stipulam, et timentibus nomen domini orietur sol iustitiae, quando impii punientur iudicio iustitiae. hoc iustus, cuius tu amicus es, domine papa, exclamat, contremiscit et suppliciter dicit: Domine, ne intres in iudicium cum seruo tuo. si gratia esset remunerantis, non timeret iustus secretarium iudicii maiestatis. serui tui Flori haec fides est, pater, non sicut fratres isti sunt locuti. in praesentiarum audierunt ab illo dictum non iuxta merita nostra dari donum pietatis sed per gratiam redemptoris; nam de illo die quis dubitet longe esse gratiam, cum coeperit irasci iustitia? hoc clamamus, pater, hoc te docente cantamus non securi sed trepidi: Domine, ne in furore tuo arguas me neque in ira tua corripias me; hoc dicimus: Emenda nos, domine, et de lege tua erudi nos, ut mitiges nos a diebus malis; hoc credimus docente te, uenerabilis pater, quia dominus interrogat iustum et impium, quia a dextris et sinistris positis bonis et malis inputat remuneranda opera pietatis, enumerat puniendam tenacitatem impietatis. ubi erit gratia, quando pro sui qualitate dispungentur opera siue bona siue mala?

### English translation (Claude)

But since sometimes, lord pope, joy comes from sorrow, we are not so saddened, because through these ignorant and curious men we have been found worthy to be enlightened by the most gentle admonitions of Your Holiness. For the doubt of the blessed apostle Thomas, seeking the holes of the nails, was the strengthening of the universal Church. So we received, lord pope, the medicine of your devoutly healing letter with its grace, and we beat our breasts, so that at least in this way our conscience might be healed, which grace heals and gives life through our free will, the gift of mercy; but this is in the present time, while we still sing of mercy, in the time of delay. For when we begin to sing of judgment to the Lord, we shall receive the reward for our work, because the Lord is merciful and just, compassionate and upright; because, as Your Holiness teaches us, we must appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or evil; because the Lord will come and his reward with him; because a man will stand and his work before him; because the Lord will come like a burning oven to burn up the ungodly like stubble, and for those who fear the name of the Lord the sun of righteousness will rise, when the ungodly are punished by the judgment of righteousness. This the righteous man, whose friend you are, lord pope, cries out, trembles, and humbly says: “Lord, do not enter into judgment with your servant.” If it were the grace of one who rewards, the righteous man would not fear the tribunal of the majesty of judgment. This is the faith of your servant Florus, father, not as those brothers said. In person they heard him say that the gift of godliness is given not according to our merits but through the grace of the Redeemer; for who would doubt that on that day grace is far away, when justice has begun to be angry? This we cry out, father; this, as you teach us, we sing, not secure but trembling: “Lord, do not rebuke me in your fury, nor chasten me in your wrath.” This we say: “Correct us, Lord, and teach us out of your law, that you may give us rest from evil days.” This we believe, venerable father, as you teach, that the Lord examines the righteous and the ungodly, that, with the good and the evil set on the right and on the left, he credits the works of godliness to be rewarded and lists the obstinacy of ungodliness to be punished. Where will grace be when works, both good and evil, are reckoned according to their quality?

### Scripture references

- John 20:25: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 101:1 (100:1 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 116:5 (114:5 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- 2 Cor 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Isa 40:10: allusion, medium confidence
- Mal 4:1–2 (3:19-Mal LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 6:1 (6:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:12–13 (93:12-Ps LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:33–46: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 20:25; Ps 101:1; Ps 116:5 (Ps 112:4); 2 Cor 5:10; Isa 40:10 (Isa 62:11); Mal 4:1–2; Ps 143:2; Ps 6:1; Ps 94:12–13; Matt 25:33–46.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.4 (CSEL 57:399–400; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-4).

## Letter 216.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-5
- Source: CSEL 57:400–401
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus rejects the claim that doing good lies in one's own power, insisting that free will is healed and helped daily by the grace of Christ.

### Latin text

Sed cur non directum non timet proferri mendacium? liberum arbitrium dei gratia curatum non negamus; sed per Christi cotidianam gratiam proficere credimus et adiuuari confidimus. et homines dicunt: <In mea est potestate, ut faciam bonum. si tamen facerent homines bonum! o inanis gloriatio miserorum! cotidie peccata arguunt et ipsi sibi adsumunt nudum liberum iactantes arbitrium non discutientes conscientiam suam, quae non potest curari nisi per gratiam, ut dicerent: Miserere mei; sana animam meam, quia peccaui tibi. quid facerent, qui de libero sibi gloriantur arbitrio, quod non negatur cum dei dumtaxat adiutorio, si iam absorpta fuisset mors in uictoria, si iam mortale nostrum indueret inmortalitatem et corruptibile nostrum indueret incorruptionem? ecce fetent uulnera et superbe petitur medicina. non dicunt sicut iustus: Nisi dominus adiuuisset me, paulo minus habitasset in inferno anima mea; non dicunt sicut sanctus: Nisi dominus custodierit ciuitatem, frustra uigilauit, qui custodit eam.

### English translation (Claude)

But why is a lie not afraid to be put forward openly? We do not deny free will healed by the grace of God; but we believe that it makes progress through the daily grace of Christ, and we trust that it is helped. And men say, “It is in my power to do good.” If only men did good! O empty boasting of the wretched! Every day they are convicted of sins, and yet they claim for themselves, boasting of bare free will, without examining their conscience, which cannot be healed except by grace, so as to say, “Have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you.” What would those who boast of free will (which is not denied, provided it is with God's help) do if death had already been swallowed up in victory, if our mortal nature had already put on immortality and our corruptible nature had put on incorruption? Look, the wounds stink, and the medicine is proudly sought. They do not say, as the righteous man does, “Unless the Lord had helped me, my soul would soon have dwelt in hell”; they do not say, as the holy man does, “Unless the Lord guards the city, the watchman stays awake in vain.”

### Scripture references

- Ps 41:4 (40:5 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53–54: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 94:17 (93:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 127:1 (126:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 41:4; 1 Cor 15:54, 53; Ps 94:17; Ps 127:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.5 (CSEL 57:400–401; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-5).

## Letter 216.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-6
- Source: CSEL 57:401–403
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Valentinus asks Augustine's prayers, commends Florus to him, and asks him to instruct the monastery on its rule.

### Latin text

Sed ora, piissime pater, ut iam non curam geramus nisi pro peccato nostro lacrimis expiando et dei gratia commendanda; ora, domine pater, ut non urgeat super nos puteus os suum, ut saluemur a descendentibus in lacum, ut non pereat cum impiis anima nostra per superbiam nostram, sed sanetur per domini gratiam. sicut ergo praecepisti, domine papa, frater noster Florus, seruus sanctitatis tuae, omni alacritate perrexit, cui non impedit, sed proficit fatigatio, ut accedat ei dilucidata cordis instructio. quem tuae sanctimoniae suppliciter commendamus pariterque deposcimus, ut et ignaros tuis orationibus domino commendes mansuetissime componendos. ora, domine et dulcissime pater, ut fugiat diabolus de congregatione nostra et amota omni alienarum quaestionum procella nauis propositi nostri epibatis quietis onusta intra stationem tutissimi portus secura consistat. dum nauigat per hoc mare magnum et inmensum, et in illo portu, intra quem iam non erit metuendum uitae nauigium, mercium indiscrepans accipiat pretium placitarum. hoc tuae sanctitatis impetraturos nos confidimus adiutorio per gratiam, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. omnes filios apostolatus tui dominos nostros clericos ac sanctos in congregatione propositi seruientes deprecamur ut digneris nostro officio salutare, ut cum tua beatitudine omnes pro nobis orare dignentur. indiscrepans trinitas domini dei nostri sanctum apostolatum tuum. quem elegit per gratiam, conseruet nobis in ecclesia sua et nostri memorem coronet in ecclesia magna, quod optamus, domine. si quid autem famulus tuae sanctitatis frater suggesserit Florus, pro regula monasterii digneris, pater, petimus. libenter accipere et per omnia nos infirmos instruere.

### English translation (Claude)

But pray, most devout father, that we may have no care except to expiate our sin with tears and to commend the grace of God; pray, lord father, that the pit may not close its mouth over us, that we may be saved from those who go down into the pit, that our soul may not perish with the ungodly through our pride, but be healed through the Lord's grace. So, as you commanded, lord pope, our brother Florus, the servant of Your Holiness, has set out with all eagerness; the fatigue does not hinder him but profits him, so that a clearer instruction of heart may come to him. We humbly commend him to Your Holiness, and likewise ask that you commend the ignorant too to the Lord in your prayers, to be most gently set right. Pray, lord and sweetest father, that the devil may flee from our community, and that, every storm of strange questions removed, the ship of our way of life, laden with passengers of quiet, may stand secure within the shelter of a most safe harbor while it sails through this great and boundless sea; and that in that harbor, within which the voyage of life will no longer be fearful, it may receive the agreed price of its pleasing wares. This we trust we shall obtain by the help of Your Holiness, through the grace that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. We beg you to be good enough to greet with our respects all the sons of your apostolate, our lords the clergy, and the holy ones serving in the community of our way of life, so that all, with Your Blessedness, may be good enough to pray for us. May the undivided Trinity of the Lord our God preserve for us in his Church your holy apostolate, which he chose by grace, and, mindful of us, crown it in the great Church, which we desire, lord. And if brother Florus, the servant of Your Holiness, suggests anything for the rule of the monastery, we ask you, father, to be good enough to receive it willingly and to instruct us, weak as we are, in all things.

### Scripture references

- Ps 69:15 (68:16 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 30:3 (29:4 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 104:25 (103:25 LXX): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 69:15; Ps 30:3; 2 Tim 2:1; Ps 104:25 (“this great and boundless sea”). “Your apostolate” is an honorific for a bishop.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 216.6 (CSEL 57:401–403; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-216-6).

## Letter 217.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-1
- Source: CSEL 57:403–404
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Vitalis of Carthage, who held that the beginning of faith comes from our own will, arguing that this view contradicts the Church's prayers for the right faith of others.

### Latin text

Cum de te mihi essent nuntiata non bona, et rogaui deum et, donec bona mihi nuntientur, adhuc rogo, ut litteras meas nec aspernanter sumas et salubriter legas. si hanc exaudit pro te orationem meam, etiam de te gratiarum actionem donat ut offeram. quod si impetro. procul dubio non contra dicis huic ipsi principio epistulae meae. hoc enim pro te oro, ut sis rectae fidei. si hoc ergo pro caris nostris non tibi displicet ut oremus, si hanc orationem recognoscis esse Christianam. si et tu pro caris tuis talia uel orare te recolis uel orare te debere cognoscis. quo modo dicis, quod te audio dicere, ut recte credamus in deum et euangelio consentiamus, non esse donum dei, sed hoc nobis esse a nobis, id est ex propria uoluntate, quam nobis in nostro corde non operatus est ipse? et ad hoc cum audieris: Quid est ergo, quod ait apostolus: Deus in nobis operatur et uelle? respondes per legem suam. per scripturas suas deum operari. ut uelimus, quas uel legimus uel audimus: sed eis consentire uel non consentire ita nostrum est. ut, si uelimus, fiat, si autem nolimus. nihil in nobis operationem dei ualere faciamus. operatur quippe ille, dicis, quantum in ipso est. ut uelimus, dum nobis nota fiunt eius eloquia; sed si eis adquiescere nolumus, nos, ut operatio eius nihil in nobis prosit, efficimus. quae si dicis, profecto nostris orationibus contra dicis.

### English translation (Claude)

Since reports about you that were not good had reached me, I both asked God, and still ask him until good reports reach me, that you may receive my letter without scorn and read it to your profit. If he hears this prayer of mine for you, he also grants that I may offer thanksgiving concerning you. And if I obtain this, you will certainly not contradict this very beginning of my letter. For this is what I pray for you: that you may be of right faith. If, then, it does not displease you that we pray this for those dear to us, if you recognize this prayer as Christian, if you too remember praying such things for those dear to you, or recognize that you ought to pray them, how can you say what I hear you say, that our believing rightly in God and assenting to the gospel is not a gift of God, but that we have this from ourselves, that is, from our own will, which he himself has not worked in our heart? And when you hear in reply, “What, then, does the apostle mean when he says, ‘God works in us both to will’?” you answer that God works in us to will through his law, through his Scriptures, which we either read or hear; but that assenting or not assenting to them is so much ours that, if we will, it happens, but if we do not will, we make God's working of no effect in us. “He works, indeed,” you say, “as far as is in him, that we may will, when his words become known to us; but if we refuse to acquiesce in them, we bring it about that his working profits us nothing.” If you say this, you certainly contradict our prayers.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Vitalis, a layman of Carthage (ca. 427). Phil 2:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.1 (CSEL 57:403–404; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-1).

## Letter 217.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-2
- Source: CSEL 57:404
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine ironically challenges Vitalis to reject the liturgical prayers for unbelievers, catechumens, and the faithful, and Cyprian's book on the Lord's Prayer, if he holds that faith comes from the human will alone.

### Latin text

Dic ergo apertissime nos pro his, quibus euangelium praedicamus, non debere orare, ut credant, sed eis tantum modo praedicare. exerce contra orationes ecclesiae disputationes tuas et, quando audis sacerdotem dei ad altare dei exhortantem populum dei orare pro incredulis, ut eos deus conuertat ad fidem, et pro catechumenis, ut eis desiderium regenerationis inspiret, et pro fidelibus, ut in eo, quod esse coeperunt, eius munere perseuerent, subsanna pias uoces et dic te non facere, quod hortatur, id est deum pro infidelibus, ut eos fideles faciat, non rogare eo, quod non sint ista diuinae miserationis beneficia sed humanae officia uoluntatis, et homo in Carthaginensi eruditus ecclesia etiam beatissimi Cypriani librum de dominica oratione condemna, quam doctor ille cum exponeret, ea petenda esse ostendit a deo patre, quae tu dicis esse homini ab homine, hoc est a se ipso.

### English translation (Claude)

Say, then, quite openly that we ought not to pray for those to whom we preach the gospel, that they may believe, but only preach to them. Direct your arguments against the prayers of the Church; and when you hear the priest of God at God's altar exhorting the people of God to pray for unbelievers, that God may convert them to the faith; and for catechumens, that he may inspire in them the desire for regeneration; and for the faithful, that by his gift they may persevere in what they have begun to be: mock these devout words, and say that you do not do what he exhorts, that is, that you do not ask God for unbelievers that he may make them believers, because these are not benefits of divine mercy but duties of the human will. And, though a man educated in the church of Carthage, condemn also the book of the most blessed Cyprian on the Lord's Prayer, in expounding which that teacher showed that those things are to be asked of God the Father which you say man has from man, that is, from himself.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Dom. or. (On the Lord's Prayer): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The prayers described are the intercessions of the African liturgy. Cyprian, On the Lord's Prayer.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.2 (CSEL 57:404; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-2).

## Letter 217.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-3
- Source: CSEL 57:404–405
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Paul's prayer and from Psalm 37:23 that the good will to believe is itself God's gift, not something that precedes it.

### Latin text

Quod si de precibus ecclesiae et de martyre Cypriano parum putas esse quod dixi, aude maiora, reprehende apostolum Paulum, quoniam dixit: Oramus ad deum, ne quid faciatis mali. neque enim dicturus es nihil mali eum facere, qui non credit in Christum aut qui fidem deserit Christi. ac per hoc, qui dicit: Ne quid faciatis mali, nec ista uult fieri satisque illi non est praecipere, sed confitetur se deum rogare, ne fiant, sciens hominis uoluntatem ab ipso corrigi ac dirigi, ut ista non faciat. a domino enim gressus hominis diriguntur et uiam eius uolet. non dixit: Et uiam eius discet aut tenebit aut ambulabit aut aliquid huius modi, quod posses dicere a domino quidem dari sed homini iam uolenti. ut scilicet beneficium dei, quo gressus hominis dirigit, ut eius uiam discat, teneat, gradiatur, sua homo uoluntate praecedat et hoc dei donum praecedente sua uoluntate mereatur. sed ideo dixit: A domino gressus hominis diriguntur et uiam eius uolet, ut intellegeremus ipsam uoluntatem bonam. qua incipimus uelle credere — quoniam dei uia quid est nisi fides recta? —. illius esse donum, qui gressus nostros propterea dirigit primitus, ut uelimus. non enim ait scriptura: A domino gressus hominis diriguntur, quia uiam eius uoluit, sed: Diriguntur, inquit, et uolet. non igitur, quia uoluit, diriguntur, sed. quia diriguntur, uolet.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you think what I have said of the prayers of the Church and of the martyr Cyprian is too little, dare greater things: rebuke the apostle Paul, because he said, “We pray to God that you may do no evil.” For you will not say that he does no evil who does not believe in Christ, or who deserts the faith of Christ. And so he who says, “That you may do no evil,” does not wish these things to happen, and it is not enough for him to command it, but he confesses that he asks God that they may not happen, knowing that man's will is corrected and directed by him so as not to do them. For “the steps of a man are directed by the Lord, and he will will his way.” He did not say, “and he will learn his way,” or “keep it,” or “walk in it,” or anything of the kind which you could say is given indeed by the Lord, but to a man already willing; so that, of course, man would precede by his own will the benefit of God by which he directs a man's steps to learn, keep, and walk his way, and would merit this gift of God by his preceding will. But he said, “The steps of a man are directed by the Lord, and he will will his way,” so that we might understand that the very good will by which we begin to will to believe (for what is the way of God if not right faith?) is the gift of him who first directs our steps precisely so that we may will. For Scripture does not say, “The steps of a man are directed by the Lord because he willed his way,” but, “They are directed,” it says, “and he will will it.” So it is not because he willed that they are directed, but because they are directed that he will will.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 13:7: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 37:23 (36:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 13:7; Ps 37:23 (Old Latin, after the LXX: “and he will will his way”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.3 (CSEL 57:404–405; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-3).

## Letter 217.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-4
- Source: CSEL 57:405–406
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine identifies Vitalis's view, that grace consists only in teaching to which the will freely assents, with the Pelagian position that Pelagius himself had renounced at Diospolis.

### Latin text

Hic tu rursus fortasse dicturus es hoc fieri a domino, dum doctrina eius legitur uel auditur, si homo ueritati, quam legit uel audit, sua consentiat uoluntate. si enim lateret eum inquis, doctrina dei. non dirigerentur gressus eius, quibus directis uellet uiam dei ac per hoc sic tantum putas a domino gressus hominis dirigi ad eligendam uiam dei. quia sine doctrina dei non ei potest innotescere ueritas, cui propria uoluntate consentiat. cui si consentit. inquis, quod in eius libero arbitrio constitutum est, recte utique dicuntur ab illo dirigi gressus eius, ut uiam eius uelit, cuius doctrinam suasione praecedente subsequente consensione sectatur, quod libertate naturali, si uult, facit, si non uult, non facit pro eo, quod fecerit, praemium uel supplicium recepturus. haec est illa Pelagianorum male diffamata meritoque reprobata et ab ipso etiam Pelagio timente damnari in orientalium episcoporum iudicio damnata sententia, qua dicunt gratiam dei non ad singulos actus dari, sed in libero arbitrio esse uel in lege atque doctrina. et usque adeo, frater. erimus graues corde, ut de gratia dei, immo aduersus gratiam dei eam Pelagianam sententiam teneamus, quam pectore quidem ficto sed tamen catholicos iudices timens Pelagius ipse damnauit!

### English translation (Claude)

Here you will perhaps say again that this is done by the Lord when his teaching is read or heard, if a man assents by his own will to the truth that he reads or hears. “For if the teaching of God were hidden from him,” you say, “his steps would not be directed so that, once directed, he would will the way of God.” And so you think that a man's steps are directed by the Lord to choose the way of God only in the sense that without God's teaching the truth cannot become known to him for him to assent to it by his own will. “And if he assents to it,” you say, “which is placed in his free choice, his steps are certainly rightly said to be directed by him, so that he wills his way, whose teaching he follows, persuasion preceding and assent following; which by natural freedom he does if he wills, and does not do if he does not will, and he will receive reward or punishment for what he has done.” This is that notorious opinion of the Pelagians, deservedly condemned, and condemned even by Pelagius himself, fearing to be condemned, at the trial before the Eastern bishops, by which they say that the grace of God is not given for individual acts, but consists in free will or in the law and teaching. And shall we be so heavy of heart, brother, as to hold concerning the grace of God, or rather against the grace of God, that Pelagian opinion which Pelagius himself, with a feigned heart indeed but still fearing the Catholic judges, condemned?

### Scripture references

- Ps 4:2 (4:3 LXX): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The synod of Diospolis (415). Ps 4:2 (“heavy of heart”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.4 (CSEL 57:405–406; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-4).

## Letter 217.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-5
- Source: CSEL 57:406–407
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if grace were only teaching applied to free will, prayer for the conversion and perseverance of others would be pointless, and that whatever must be asked of God is given by God.

### Latin text

Et quo modo, inquies, respondebitur? quo modo censes facilius et apertius, quam ut illud. quod de orando deo superius egimus, sic amplectamur, ut hoc menti nostrae nulla subtrahat obliuionis inreptio. nulla calliditas argumentationis extorqueat? si enim, quod scriptum est: A domino gressus hominis diriguntur et uiam eius uolet et: Praeparatur uoluntas a domino et: Deus est enim, qui operatur in uobis et uelle, et multa huius modi, quibus commendatur uera dei gratia, hoc est quae non secundum merita nostra datur, sed dat merita ipsa, cum datur, quia praeuenit hominis uoluntatem bonam nec eam cuiusquam inuenit in corde, sed facit, - si ergo ita praepararet atque ita operaretur deus hominis uoluntatem, ut tantum modo legem suam atque doctrinam libero eius adhiberet arbitrio nec uocatione illa alta atque secreta sic eius ageret sensum, ut eidem legi atque doctrinae accommodaret adsensum, procul dubio eam legere uel intellegere legendo uel etiam exponere ac praedicare sufficeret nec opus esset orare. ut deus ad fidem suam infidelium corda conuerteret et conuersis proficientem perseuerantiam eiusdem suae gratiae largitate donaret. si ergo haec a domino poscenda esse non rennuis, quid restat, frater Vitalis, nisi ut ab illo ea donari fatearis, a quo poscenda esse consentis? si autem negas ab illo nos poscere ista debere. eidem doctrinae ipsius contra dicis, quia et hoc in ea didicimus, ut ab illo ista poscamus.

### English translation (Claude)

“And how,” you will say, “is this to be answered?” How do you think more easily and plainly than by so embracing what we discussed above about praying to God that no creeping in of forgetfulness may take it from our mind and no cleverness of argument wrest it away? For consider what is written: “The steps of a man are directed by the Lord, and he will will his way,” and “The will is prepared by the Lord,” and “For it is God who works in you both to will,” and many such texts, by which the true grace of God is commended, that is, the grace that is not given according to our merits but gives the merits themselves when it is given, because it goes before a man's good will and does not find it in anyone's heart but makes it. If, then, God so prepared and so worked a man's will that he merely applied his law and teaching to his free choice, and did not by that deep and secret calling so move his mind as to bring it to assent to that same law and teaching, it would certainly be enough to read it, or to understand it by reading, or even to expound and preach it, and there would be no need to pray that God would convert the hearts of unbelievers to his faith, and grant to the converted, by the generosity of the same grace of his, a perseverance that makes progress. If, then, you do not refuse that these things are to be asked of the Lord, what remains, brother Vitalis, but that you confess that they are given by him of whom you agree they are to be asked? But if you deny that we ought to ask these things of him, you contradict his very teaching, since in it too we have learned to ask these things of him.

### Scripture references

- Ps 37:23 (36:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 8:35: quotation, medium confidence
- Phil 2:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 37:23; Prov 8:35 (LXX: “the will is prepared by the Lord”); Phil 2:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.5 (CSEL 57:406–407; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-5).

## Letter 217.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-6
- Source: CSEL 57:407–408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Cyprian's interpretation of "Thy will be done on earth as in heaven" as a prayer for the conversion of unbelievers, which would be empty if God did not convert their wills.

### Latin text

Orationem dominicam nosti nec te dubito deo dicere: Pater noster. qui es in caelis, et cetera. lege expositorem eius beatissimum Cyprianum et, quem ad modum exposuerit, quod ibi dicitur: Fiat uoluntas tua sicut in caelo et in terra, diligenter adtende et oboedienter intellege; profecto docebit te orare pro infidelibus inimicis ecclesiae secundum praeceptum domini dicentis: Orate pro inimicis uestris et hoc orare, ut fiat uoluntas dei sicut in eis, qui iam fideles sunt et portant imaginem caelestis hominis et propterea caeli nomine digni sunt, ita et in eis, qui per infidelitatem non nisi imaginem terreni hominis portant et ob hoc terra merito nuncupantur. nempe isti, pro quibus inimicis dominus nos iussit orare et gloriosissimus martyr sic exposuit, quod in oratione dicimus: Fiat uoluntas tua sicut in caelo et in terra, ut ipsis etiam poscamus fidem, quam fideles habent, — nempe ergo isti Christianae pietatis inimici legem dei atque doctrinam, qua Christi praedicatur fides, uel omnino audire nolunt uel ad hoc audiunt siue etiam legunt, ut inrideant et detestentur et, quanta possunt contradictione, blasphement. inaniter igitur et perfunctorie potius quam ueraciter pro eis. ut doctrinae, cui aduersantur, credendo consentiant, deo fundimus preces, si ad eius non pertinet gratiam conuertere ad fidem suam ipsi fidei contrarias hominum uoluntates: inaniter etiam et perfunctorie potius quam ueraciter magnas cum exultatione agimus deo gratias, quando aliqui eorum credunt, si hoc in eis ipse non facit.

### English translation (Claude)

You know the Lord's Prayer, and I do not doubt that you say to God, “Our Father, who art in heaven,” and the rest. Read its expositor, the most blessed Cyprian, and attend carefully and understand obediently how he expounded what is said there: “Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth.” He will certainly teach you to pray for the unbelieving enemies of the Church, according to the command of the Lord who says, “Pray for your enemies,” and to pray this: that God's will may be done, as in those who are already believers and bear the image of the heavenly man and are therefore worthy of the name of heaven, so also in those who through unbelief bear only the image of the earthly man and for this reason are rightly called earth. Surely these, the enemies for whom the Lord commanded us to pray, and for whom the most glorious martyr so expounded what we say in the prayer, “Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth,” that we ask for them too the faith that believers have; surely, I say, these enemies of Christian godliness either refuse altogether to hear the law and teaching of God by which the faith of Christ is preached, or hear or even read it only to mock and detest it and blaspheme it with all the contradiction they can. So we pour out prayers to God for them, that they may assent by believing to the teaching they oppose, emptily and perfunctorily rather than truly, if it does not belong to his grace to convert to his faith the wills of men that are contrary to that faith; and emptily and perfunctorily rather than truly do we give great thanks to God with rejoicing when some of them believe, if he himself does not do this in them.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:9–10: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:44: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:49: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Dom. or. 17 (On the Lord's Prayer): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 6:9–10; Matt 5:44; 1 Cor 15:49; Cyprian, On the Lord's Prayer 17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.6 (CSEL 57:407–408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-6).

## Letter 217.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-7
- Source: CSEL 57:408
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that those who deny God's work in the will only pretend to pray and give thanks.

### Latin text

Non fallamus homines; nam deum fallere non ualemus. prorsus non oramus deum. sed orare nos fingimus, si nos ipsos non illum credimus facere, quod oramus; prorsus non deo gratias agimus, sed nos agere fingimus, si, unde illi gratias agimus, ipsum facere non putamus. labia dolosa si in hominum quibuscumque sermonibus sunt, saltem in orationibus non sint. absit, ut, quod facere deum rogamus oribus et uocibus nostris. eum facere negemus cordibus nostris et. quod est grauius. ad alios etiam decipiendos hoc non taceamus disputationibus nostris et, dum uolumus apud homines defendere liberum arbitrium, apud deum perdamus orationis auxilium et gratiarum actionem non habeamus ueram, dum ueram non agnoscimus gratiam.

### English translation (Claude)

Let us not deceive men; for we cannot deceive God. We certainly do not pray to God, but only pretend to pray, if we believe that we ourselves, not he, do what we pray for; we certainly do not give thanks to God, but only pretend to, if we do not think that he does what we thank him for. If deceitful lips are found in any human conversations, at least let them not be found in prayers. Far be it from us to deny in our hearts that God does what we ask him to do with our mouths and voices; and, what is worse, not to keep silent about this in our arguments, so as to deceive others too; and, while we wish to defend free will before men, to lose before God the help of prayer, and not to have true thanksgiving, while we do not acknowledge true grace.

### Scripture references

- Ps 12:2 (11:3 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 12:2; Ps 31:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.7 (CSEL 57:408; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-7).

## Letter 217.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-8
- Source: CSEL 57:408–409
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Colossians 1:12–13 that God frees the will from the power of darkness, so that believers come to faith by free will and yet by grace.

### Latin text

Si uere nolumus defendere liberum arbitrium, non oppugnemus, unde fit liberum. nam qui oppugnat gratiam, qua nostrum ad declinandum a malo et faciendum bonum liberatur arbitrium. ipse arbitrium suum adhuc uult esse captiuum. responde, obsecro; quo modo dicit apostolus: Gratias agentes patri idoneos facienti nos in parte sortis sanctorum in lumine. qui eruit nos de potestate tenebrarum et transtulit in regnum filii caritatis suae, si non ipse arbitrium nostrum sed ipsum arbitrium se liberat? mendaciter ergo agimus gratias patri, tamquam ipse faciat, quod ipse non facit. et errauit. qui dixit, quod ipse nos faciat idoneos in parte sortis sanctorum in lumine, quia ipse nos eruit de potestate tenebrarum et transtulit in regnum filii caritatis suae. responde; quo modo ad declinandum a malo et faciendum bonum liberum habebamus arbitrium, quando erat sub potestate tenebrarum? unde nos si. quem ad modum dicit apostolus, deus eruit, ipse illud utique liberum fecit. quod tam magnum nostrum bonum si per suae doctrinae praedicationem tantum modo facit, quid de his dicemus, quos de ipsa tenebrarum potestate nondum eruit? praedicanda tantum illis est doctrina diuina. an etiam orandum pro eis, ut de tenebrarum potestate diuinitus eruantur? si tantum modo praedicandum esse dicis, iussioni domini et orationibus ecclesiae contra dicis; si autem pro eis fateris orandum. id utique orandum fateris, ut eidem doctrinae arbitrio liberato a tenebrarum potestate consentiant. ita fit, ut neque fideles fiant nisi libero arbitrio et tamen illius gratia fideles fiant, qui eorum a potestate tenebrarum liberauit arbitrium. sic et dei gratia non negatur, sed sine ullis humanis praecedentibus meritis uera monstratur, et liberum ita defenditur, ut humilitate solidetur. non elatione praecipitetur, arbitrium et, qui gloriatur, non in homine uel quolibet alio uel se ipso sed in domino glorietur.

### English translation (Claude)

If we truly wish to defend free will, let us not attack that by which it is made free. For he who attacks the grace by which our will is freed to turn away from evil and do good wishes his own will to remain captive still. Answer, I beg you: how does the apostle say, “Giving thanks to the Father, who has made us fit for a share in the lot of the saints in light, who has rescued us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of the Son of his love,” if it is not he who frees our will, but the will frees itself? Then we lie in giving thanks to the Father, as though he did what he does not do, and the apostle erred in saying that he makes us fit for a share in the lot of the saints in light, because he has rescued us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of the Son of his love. Answer: how did we have free will to turn away from evil and do good when it was under the power of darkness? If, as the apostle says, God rescued us from there, he certainly made it free. And if he does so great a good of ours only by the preaching of his teaching, what shall we say of those whom he has not yet rescued from that power of darkness? Is divine teaching only to be preached to them, or is prayer also to be made for them, that they may be rescued by God from the power of darkness? If you say that it is only to be preached, you contradict the Lord's command and the prayers of the Church; but if you confess that prayer is to be made for them, you certainly confess that prayer is to be made that, with their will freed from the power of darkness, they may assent to that same teaching. So it comes about that they become believers only by free will, and yet become believers by the grace of him who freed their will from the power of darkness. In this way neither is the grace of God denied, but it is shown to be true, without any preceding human merits; and free will is so defended that it is made firm by humility, not cast down by pride; and he who boasts boasts not in man, whether another or himself, but in the Lord.

### Scripture references

- Ps 34:14 (33:15 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Col 1:12–13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 1:31: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 34:14; Col 1:12–13; Matt 5:44; 1 Cor 1:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.8 (CSEL 57:408–409; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-8).

## Letter 217.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-9
- Source: CSEL 57:409–410
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the power of darkness is the devil, to whom humanity fell subject in Adam, and from which baptized infants are rescued, the freedom of their will appearing when they reach the age of reason.

### Latin text

Potestas enim tenebrarum quid est nisi potestas diaboli et angelorum eius. qui cum fuissent angeli lucis, in ueritate per liberum arbitrium non stantes sed inde cadentes facti sunt tenebrae? non te ista doceo, sed, quae nosti, ut recorderis, admoneo. huic igitur potestati tenebrarum per illius ruinam, cui primo homini ab ea potestate praeuaricatio persuasa est et in quo omnes cecidimus, subiectum est genus humanum. propter quod de hac potestate tenebrarum eruuntur et paruuli, cum regenerantur in Christo. neque hoc apparet in eorum arbitrio liberato, nisi cum ad annos peruenerint ratione utentis aetatis habentes consentientem doctrinae salutari, in qua nutriti sunt, uoluntatem et in ea finientes istam uitam, si electi sunt in Christo ante constitutionem mundi, ut essent sancti et inmaculati in conspectu eius in caritate praedestinati in adoptionem filiorum.

### English translation (Claude)

For what is the power of darkness if not the power of the devil and his angels, who, though they had been angels of light, did not stand in the truth by free will, but falling from it became darkness? I do not teach you these things, but remind you of what you know, so that you may remember. To this power of darkness, then, the human race became subject through the fall of him, the first man, to whom transgression was suggested by that power, and in whom we all fell. For this reason even little children are rescued from this power of darkness when they are reborn in Christ. Nor does this appear in their freed will until they reach the years of an age that uses reason, having a will that assents to the saving teaching in which they were brought up, and ending this life in it, if they were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless before him in love, predestined to adoption as sons.

### Scripture references

- John 8:44: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:14: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 1:4–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 8:44; 2 Cor 11:14; Rom 5:12; Eph 1:4–5. Augustine's teaching on original sin and predestination is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.9 (CSEL 57:409–410; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-9).

## Letter 217.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-10
- Source: CSEL 57:410–411
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the devil, unable to repent, works unbelief in the unbelieving and permits seemingly good works among them, such as Roman virtues, which without faith do not please God.

### Latin text

Haec autem potestas tenebrarum, id est diabolus, qui dicitur etiam princeps potestatis aeris, operatur in filiis diffidentiae, princeps iste rector tenebrarum, id est diabolus diffidentiae filiorum regens eos ad arbitrium suum, quod nec ipse habet liberum ad benefaciendum sed ad maximam maliuolentiam poena sui sceleris obduratum. unde nemo sanae fidei credit aut dicit hos apostatas angelos ad pristinam pietatem correcta aliquando uoluntate conuerti. quid ergo operatur haec potestas in filiis diffidentiae nisi opera sua mala et in primis maximeque ipsam diffidentiam et infidelitatem, qua sunt inimici fidei, per quam scit eos posse mundari, posse sanari, posse perfectissime liberos, quod eis uehementer inuidet, in aeternitate regnare? itaque aliquos eorum, per quos amplius decipere affectat, sinit habere nonnulla uelut opera bona, in quibus laudantur per quasque gentes praecipueque in gente Romana, qui praeclare glorioseque uixerunt. sed quoniam, sicut ueracissima scriptura dicit, omne, quod non est ex fide. peccatum est et sine fide inpossibile est utique placere deo, non hominibus, nihil sic agit hic princeps, quam ut non credatur in deum nec ad mediatorem, a quo soluuntur opera eius, credendo ueniatur.

### English translation (Claude)

This power of darkness, that is, the devil, who is also called the prince of the power of the air, works in the sons of unbelief; this prince, the ruler of darkness, that is, the devil, rules the sons of unbelief according to his will, a will that he himself does not have free for doing good, but hardened to the greatest malice by the punishment of his crime. Hence no one of sound faith believes or says that these apostate angels will ever be converted, with their will corrected, to their former godliness. What, then, does this power work in the sons of unbelief if not his own evil works, and first and above all unbelief and faithlessness itself, by which they are enemies of the faith through which he knows they can be cleansed, can be healed, can reign in eternity as most perfectly free, which he greatly envies them? So he allows some of them, through whom he aims to deceive more, to have certain seemingly good works, for which those are praised among all peoples, and above all among the Roman people, who lived splendidly and gloriously. But since, as the most truthful Scripture says, “whatever is not from faith is sin,” and “without faith it is impossible to please” God (not men), this prince does nothing so much as to bring it about that men do not believe in God, nor come by believing to the Mediator, by whom his works are destroyed.

### Scripture references

- Eph 2:2: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 14:23: quotation, high confidence
- Heb 11:6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 3:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Eph 2:2; Eph 6:12; Rom 14:23; Heb 11:6; 1 John 3:8. Augustine's judgment on the virtues of pagans is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.10 (CSEL 57:410–411; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-10).

## Letter 217.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-11
- Source: CSEL 57:411–412
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ binds the devil and frees the will of his chosen to believe, and that this is the work of grace, not of nature or of the law.

### Latin text

Sed ipse mediator intrat in domum fortis. id est in hoc saeculum mortalium sub potestate diaboli, quantum ad ipsum pertinet, constitutum; de ipso quippe scriptum est. quod potestatem habeat mortis. intrat in domum fortis. id est in suo dominatu habentis genus humanum et prius alligat eum, id est eius cohercet et cohibet potestatem potestatis suae fortioribus uinculis et sic eripit uasa eius, quaecumque praedestinauit eripere, arbitrium eorum ab eius liberans potestate, ut illo non impediente credant in istum libera uoluntate. proinde hoc opus est gratiae non naturae. opus est, inquam, gratiae, quam nobis adtulit secundus Adam, non naturae. quam totam perdidit in semet ipso primus Adam. opus est gratiae tollentis peccatum et uiuificantis mortuum peccatorem, non opus legis ostendentis peccatum nec a peccato uiuificantis; nam ille magnus gratiae praedicator: Peccatum, inquit, non cognoui nisi per legem et: Si data esset, inquit, lex, quae posset uiuificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia. opus est hoc gratiae. quam qui accipiunt, doctrinae salutari scripturarum sanctarum, etsi fuerunt inimici, fiunt amici, non opus eiusdem doctrinae, quam qui audiunt et legunt sine gratia dei. peiores eius efficiuntur inimici.

### English translation (Claude)

But the Mediator himself enters the strong man's house, that is, this world of mortals, set, as far as the devil is concerned, under his power; for of him it is written that he has the power of death. He enters the strong man's house, that is, the house of him who holds the human race in his dominion, and first binds him, that is, restrains and checks his power by the stronger bonds of his own power, and so plunders his goods, whichever he has predestined to plunder, freeing their will from his power, so that, without his hindering, they may believe in Christ with free will. Accordingly, this is the work of grace, not of nature: the work, I say, of the grace which the second Adam brought us, not of the nature which the first Adam lost entirely in himself. It is the work of grace, which takes away sin and gives life to the dead sinner, not the work of the law, which shows sin and does not give life from sin; for that great preacher of grace says, “I did not know sin except through the law,” and, “If a law had been given that could give life, righteousness would indeed be from the law.” This is the work of grace, by which those who receive it, even if they were enemies, become friends of the saving teaching of the holy Scriptures; not the work of that same teaching, of which those who hear and read it without the grace of God become worse enemies.

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:29: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:45–47: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 3:21: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 12:29; Heb 2:14; 1 Cor 15:45–47; Rom 7:7; Gal 3:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.11 (CSEL 57:411–412; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-11).

## Letter 217.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-12
- Source: CSEL 57:412–413
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine insists that grace is not the law or teaching but God's gift for each act, which alone makes teaching profitable.

### Latin text

Non est igitur gratia dei in natura liberi arbitrii et in lege atque doctrina, sicut Pelagiana peruersitas desipit, sed ad singulos actus datur illius uoluntate. de quo scriptum est: Pluuiam uoluntariam segregans deus hereditati suae, quia et liberum arbitrium ad diligendum deum primi peccati granditate perdidimus et lex dei atque doctrina quamuis sancta et iusta et bona tamen occidit, si non uiuificet spiritus, per quem fit, non ut audiendo sed ut oboediendo neque ut lectione sed ut dilectione teneatur. quapropter, ut in deum credamus et pie uiuamus. non uolentis neque currentis sed miserentis est dei, non quia uelle non debemus et currere. sed quia ipse in nobis et uelle operatur et currere. unde et ipse dominus Iesus credentes a non credentibus, id est ab irae uasis uasa misericordiae discernens: Nemo, inquit, uenit ad me. nisi fuerit ei datum a patre meo: et utique, ut hoc diceret, in eius doctrina fuerant scandalizati discipuli eius. qui eum postea non sunt secuti. non ergo gratiam dicamus esse doctrinam, sed agnoscamus gratiam, quae facit prodesse doctrinam, quae gratia si desit, uidemus etiam obesse doctrinam.

### English translation (Claude)

So the grace of God does not consist in the nature of free will and in the law and teaching, as Pelagian perversity foolishly holds, but is given for individual acts by the will of him of whom it is written, “God setting apart a voluntary rain for his inheritance”; because we lost free will for loving God by the greatness of the first sin, and the law and teaching of God, though holy and just and good, nevertheless kills if the Spirit does not give life, through whom it comes about that it is held not by hearing but by obeying, not by reading but by loving. Therefore, that we may believe in God and live devoutly, it depends not on the one who wills or the one who runs, but on God who has mercy; not because we ought not to will and run, but because he himself works in us both to will and to run. Hence the Lord Jesus himself too, distinguishing believers from unbelievers, that is, vessels of mercy from vessels of wrath, said, “No one comes to me unless it has been granted him by my Father”; and indeed he said this when his disciples who afterward did not follow him had been scandalized at his teaching. So let us not say that grace is teaching, but let us acknowledge the grace that makes teaching profitable; for if this grace is lacking, we see that teaching even does harm.

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:9 (67:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Rom 7:12: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 3:6: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:16: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:13: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:22–23: allusion, high confidence
- John 6:65–66: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 68:9 (LXX/Vulgate: “a voluntary rain”); Rom 7:12; 2 Cor 3:6; Rom 9:16; Phil 2:13; Rom 9:22–23; John 6:65–66.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.12 (CSEL 57:412–413; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-12).

## Letter 217.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-13
- Source: CSEL 57:413
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that God's answering prayers for unbelievers' conversion refutes the view that grace is mere nature or teaching, since we pray for the healing of their will.

### Latin text

Propterea deus, ut omnia futura opera sua in praedestinatione praesciuerit, sic illa disposuit. ut quosdam non credentes ad fidem suam orationes credentium pro eis exaudiendo conuertat, unde refutentur et, si ille est eis propitius, corrigantur, qui putant gratiam dei esse naturam liberi arbitrii, cum qua nascimur, aut gratiam dei esse doctrinam quamuis utilem, quae per linguas et litteras praedicatur. non enim hoc oramus pro infidelibus, ut fiat eorum natura, id est ut homines sint aut ut doctrina eis praedicetur, quam malo suo audiunt, si non credunt — et plerumque pro eis oramus, qui. cum legant uel audiant, nolunt credere —, sed oramus, ut uoluntas corrigatur. doctrinae consentiatur, natura sanetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore God, as he foreknew all his future works in predestination, so arranged them that he converts some unbelievers to his faith by hearing the prayers of believers for them; by which those are refuted, and, if he is gracious to them, corrected, who think that the grace of God is the nature of free will with which we are born, or that the grace of God is teaching, however useful, which is preached through tongues and letters. For we do not pray for unbelievers that their nature may come to be, that is, that they may be human beings, or that teaching may be preached to them, which they hear to their own harm if they do not believe (and we often pray for those who, though they read or hear, refuse to believe); but we pray that the will may be corrected, that the teaching may be assented to, that nature may be healed.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.13 (CSEL 57:413; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-13).

## Letter 217.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-14
- Source: CSEL 57:413
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that believers pray for perseverance, and that God mixes those who will fall with those who will persevere so that all may walk in humble fear.

### Latin text

Iam uero, ut perseuerent in eo, quod esse coeperunt. etiam pro se ipsis orant fideles. utile est quippe omnibus uel paene omnibus propter humilitatem saluberrimam, ut, quales futuri sint, scire non possint. ad hoc dicitur: Qui uidetur stare, uideat ne cadat. propter huius timoris utilitatem, ne regenerati et pie uiuere incipientes tamquam securi alta sapiamus, quidam non perseueraturi perseueraturis dei permissione uel prouisione ac dispositione miscentur, quibus cadentibus territi cum timore et tremore gradiamur uiam iustam. donec ex hac uita. quae temptatio est super terram, transeamus ad aliam, ubi iam non sit elatio comprimenda nec contra eius suggestiones temptationesque luctandum.......

### English translation (Claude)

Furthermore, believers also pray for themselves, that they may persevere in what they have begun to be. For it is useful to all, or almost all, for the sake of a most wholesome humility, that they cannot know what they will be. To this end it is said, “Let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.” Because of the usefulness of this fear, lest, having been reborn and begun to live devoutly, we should think highly of ourselves as though secure, some who will not persevere are mixed, by God's permission or provision and arrangement, with those who will persevere; so that, alarmed by their fall, we may walk the righteous way with fear and trembling, until from this life, which is a trial on earth, we pass to the other, where there is no longer pride to be suppressed nor need to struggle against its suggestions and temptations ….

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 10:12: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:20: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:12: allusion, high confidence
- Job 7:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Cor 10:12; Rom 11:20; Phil 2:12; Job 7:1. The digital text ends the section with a row of dots, apparently marking a gap; it is not filled.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.14 (CSEL 57:413; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-14).

## Letter 217.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-15
- Source: CSEL 57:413–414
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine leaves open why some receive grace for a time and then fall, while insisting on holding firm to what is certain in the Catholic faith.

### Latin text

Sed de hac re, id est cur quidam non permansun m nae et sanctitate Christiana tamen accipiant ad tempus hanc gratiam et dimittantur hic uiuere, donec cadant. cum possint rapi de hac uita, ne malitia mutet intellectum eorum, quod de sancto inmatura aetate defuncto scriptum est in libro sapientiae, quaerat quisque, ut potuerit. et. si inuenerit praeter hanc, quae a me reddita est, aliam probabilem rationem a rectae fidei regula non recedens, teneat eam et ego cum illo, si me non latuerit. uerum tamen, in quod peruenimus, in eo ambulemus, donec nobis deus reuelet, si quid aliter sapimus, sicut apostolicis litteris admonemur. peruenimus autem in ea, quae ad fidem ueram et catholicam pertinere firmissime scimus, in quibus ita nobis ambulandum est adiuuante illo atque miserante, cui dicimus: Deduc me, domine. in uia tua et ambulabo in ueritate tua, ut ab eis nullo modo deuiemus.

### English translation (Claude)

But on this question, that is, why some who will not persevere in Christian faith and holiness nevertheless receive this grace for a time and are allowed to live here until they fall, when they could be snatched from this life, lest wickedness change their understanding, as is written in the book of Wisdom of the holy man who died at an early age, let each inquire as best he can; and if he finds, besides the one I have given, another probable reason that does not depart from the rule of right faith, let him hold it, and I with him, if it does not escape me. But let us walk in what we have attained, until God reveals to us if we think otherwise in anything, as we are admonished in the apostolic letters. And we have attained those things which we know most firmly belong to the true and Catholic faith; in these we must so walk, with the help and mercy of him to whom we say, “Lead me, Lord, in your way, and I will walk in your truth,” that we may in no way stray from them.

### Scripture references

- Phil 3:15–16: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 86:11 (85:11 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon is outside the 66 books); Phil 3:15–16; Ps 86:11. The words permansun m nae in the digital text are garbled (probably permansuri in fide); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.15 (CSEL 57:413–414; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/216-1/#p-217-15).

## Letter 217.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-16
- Source: CSEL 57:414–416
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sets out twelve propositions of Catholic faith on original sin, grace, judgment, infant baptism, free will, and prayer for unbelievers.

### Latin text

Quoniam ergo propitio Christo Christiani catholici sumus: Scimus nondum natos nihil egisse in uita propria boni seu mali nec secundum merita prioris alicuius uitae, quam nullam propriam singuli habere potuerunt, in huius uitae uenire miserias, sed tamen secundum Adam carnaliter natos contagium mortis antiquae prima natiuitate contrahere nec liberari a supplicio mortis aeternae, quod trahit ex uno in omnes transiens iusta damnatio, nisi per gratiam renascantur in Christo. Scimus gratiam dei nec paruulis nec maioribus secundum merita nostra dari. Scimus maioribus ad singulos actus dari. Scimus non omnibus hominibus dari et, quibus datur, non solum secundum merita operum non dari sed nec secundum merita uoluntatis eorum, quibus datur, quod maxime apparet in paruulis. Scimus eis, quibus datur, misericordia dei gratuita dari. Scimus eis. quibus non datur, iusto iudicio dei non dari. Scimus. quod omnes adstabimus ante tribunal Christi, ut ferat unusquisque secundum ea, quae per corpus gessit, non secundum ea, quae, si diutius uiueret, gesturus fuit, siue bonum siue malum. Scimus etiam paruulos secundum ea, quae per corpus gesserunt, recepturos uel bonum uel malum. gesserunt autem non per se ipsos sed per eos, quibus pro illis respondentibus et renuntiare diabolo dicuntur et credere in deum. unde et in numero fidelium computantur pertinentes ad sententiam domini dicentis: Qui crediderit et baptizatus fuerit, saluus erit. propter quod et illis, qui hoc sacramentum non accipiunt, contingit, quod sequitur: Qui autem non crediderit, condemnabitur. unde et ipsi, sicut dixi, si in illa parua aetate moriuntur, utique secundum ea, quae per corpus gesserunt, id est tempore, quo in corpore fuerunt, quando per corda et ora gestantium crediderunt uel non crediderunt, quando baptizati uel non baptizati sunt, quando carnem Christi manducarunt uel non manducarunt, quando sanguinem biberunt uel non biberunt, secundum haec ergo, quae per corpus gesserunt, non secundum ea, quae, si diu hic uiuerent. gesturi fuerant, iudicantur. Scimus felices esse mortuos, qui in domino moriuntur, nec ad eos pertinere, quicquid acturi fuerant, si tempore diuturniore uixissent. Scimus eos, qui corde proprio credunt in dominum, sua id facere uoluntate ac libero arbitrio. Scimus pro eis, qui nolunt credere, nos, qui iam credimus, recta fide agere, cum deum oramus, ut uelint. Scimus pro eis, qui ex illis crediderunt, tamquam de beneficiis recte atque ueraciter et debere nos agere deo gratias et solere.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, by Christ's favor we are Catholic Christians: We know that those not yet born have done nothing good or evil in a life of their own, and do not come into the miseries of this life according to the merits of some earlier life, which none of them could have had as his own; but that, born according to Adam in the flesh, they contract by their first birth the contagion of the ancient death, and are not freed from the punishment of eternal death, which a just condemnation, passing from one to all, draws upon them, unless they are reborn in Christ through grace. We know that the grace of God is given neither to little children nor to adults according to our merits. We know that to adults it is given for individual acts. We know that it is not given to all human beings, and that to those to whom it is given it is given not only not according to the merits of works, but not even according to the merits of the will of those to whom it is given; which appears most clearly in little children. We know that to those to whom it is given it is given by the free mercy of God. We know that to those to whom it is not given it is not given by the just judgment of God. We know that we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each may receive according to what he has done through the body, not according to what he would have done if he had lived longer, whether good or evil. We know that little children too will receive good or evil according to what they have done through the body. But they have done it not by themselves but through those by whose answering for them they are said both to renounce the devil and to believe in God. Hence they are also counted among the faithful, belonging to the Lord's saying, “He who believes and is baptized will be saved.” For this reason, to those too who do not receive this sacrament happens what follows: “But he who does not believe will be condemned.” Hence they too, as I said, if they die at that tender age, are certainly judged according to what they have done through the body, that is, in the time when they were in the body, when they believed or did not believe through the hearts and mouths of those who carried them, when they were baptized or not baptized, when they ate or did not eat the flesh of Christ, when they drank or did not drink his blood; according to these things, then, which they did through the body, not according to what they would have done if they had lived here long. We know that blessed are the dead who die in the Lord, and that whatever they would have done if they had lived a longer time does not concern them. We know that those who believe in the Lord with their own heart do so by their own will and free choice. We know that we who already believe act with right faith when we pray to God for those who refuse to believe, that they may be willing. We know that for those of them who have believed we both ought to and are accustomed to give thanks to God, rightly and truly, as for benefits.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:11: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 5:10: quotation, high confidence
- Mark 16:16: quotation, high confidence
- John 6:53: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 14:13: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:12; Rom 9:11; 2 Cor 5:10; Mark 16:16; John 6:53; Rev 14:13. Augustine's statements on the condemnation of unbaptized infants and on infants' communion are translated as written; the twelve propositions are counted in 217.17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.16 (CSEL 57:414–416; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-16).

## Letter 217.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-17
- Source: CSEL 57:416
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that his twelve propositions address only whether grace precedes or follows the human will, and that agreement on them would end the dispute.

### Latin text

Recognoscis me, ut puto, in his, quae scire nos dixi, non omnia, quae ad fidem catholicam pertinent, commemorare noluisse sed ea tantum, quae ad istam, quae inter nos agitur, de dei gratia quaestionem, utrum praecedat haec gratia, an subsequatur hominis uoluntatem, hoc est, ut planius id eloquar. utrum ideo nobis detur, quia uolumus, an per ipsam deus etiam hoc efficiat, ut uelimus. si ergo istas duodecim sententias, quas nos dixi scire ad fidem rectam et catholicam pertinere, etiam tu, frater, nobiscum tenes, ago deo gratias, quas profecto non ueraciter agerem, nisi dei gratia fieret, ut teneres. quae tibi tenenti nullum omnino remanet nobiscum de hac quaestione certamen.

### English translation (Claude)

You recognize, I think, that in what I said we know, I did not wish to mention everything that belongs to the Catholic faith, but only what concerns the question being debated between us about the grace of God: whether this grace precedes or follows the will of man, that is, to put it more plainly, whether it is given to us because we will, or whether by it God also brings it about that we will. If, then, you too, brother, hold with us these twelve propositions, which I said we know belong to the right and Catholic faith, I give thanks to God; which I would certainly not give truly, unless it were by the grace of God that you held them. And if you hold them, no dispute at all remains between you and us on this question.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.17 (CSEL 57:416; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-17).

## Letter 217.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-18
- Source: CSEL 57:416–417
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that grace given to infants and condemned Pelagian formulas show that grace is neither given for the will's merit nor identical with nature or law.

### Latin text

Ut enim eadem duodecim breui expositione percurram, quo modo uoluntatis humanae meritum sequitur gratia, cum detur et paruulis, qui hoc nondum possunt uelle seu nolle? quo modo gratiam uel in maioribus dicuntur praecedere merita uoluntatis, si gratia, ut uera sit gratia, non secundum merita nostra datur? quam sententiam catholicam Pelagius ipse sic timuit, ut eos, qui dicunt gratiam dei secundum merita nostra dari, sine dubitatione damnaret, ne a catholicis iudicibus damnaretur. quo modo dicitur gratia dei in natura esse liberi arbitrii uel in lege atque doctrina, cum et istam sententiam Pelagius ipse damnauerit procul dubio confitens gratiam dei ad singulos actus dari eis utique, qui iam libero utuntur arbitrio?

### English translation (Claude)

For, to run through these same twelve with a brief exposition: how does grace follow the merit of the human will, when it is given even to little children, who cannot yet will or refuse this? How can the merits of the will be said to precede grace even in adults, if grace, to be true grace, is not given according to our merits? Pelagius himself so feared this Catholic proposition that he condemned without hesitation those who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits, lest he be condemned by Catholic judges. How can the grace of God be said to consist in the nature of free will, or in the law and teaching, when Pelagius himself condemned this proposition too, beyond doubt confessing that the grace of God is given for individual acts, certainly to those who already use free will?

### Translation notes

- Augustine refers to the synod of Diospolis (415), where Pelagius disowned these propositions.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.18 (CSEL 57:416–417; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-18).

## Letter 217.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-19
- Source: CSEL 57:417–418
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine interprets "God wills all to be saved" as meaning that all who are saved are saved by his will, citing infants who die unbaptized despite their parents' efforts.

### Latin text

Quo modo dicitur omnes homines eam fuisse accepturos si non illi, quibus non datur, eam sua uoluntate respuerent, quoniam deus uult omnes homines saluos fieri. cum multis non detur paruulis et sine illa plerique moriantur, qui non habent contrariam uoluntatem, et aliquando cupientibus festinantibusque parentibus ministris quoque uolentibus ac paratis deo nolente non detur, cum repente, antequam detur, expirat, pro quo, ut acciperet, currebatur? unde manifestum est eos, qui huic resistunt tam perspicuae ueritati, non intellegere omnino; qua locutione sit dictum, quod omnes homines uult deus saluos fieri, cum tam multi salui non fiant, non quia ipsi sed quia deus non uult, quod sine ulla caligine manifestatur in paruulis. sed sicut illud, quod dictum est: Omnes in Christo uiuificabuntur, cum tam multi aeterna morte puniantur, ideo dictum est, quia omnes, quicumque uitam aeternam percipiunt, non percipiunt nisi in Christo, ita, quod dictum est: Omnes homines uult deus saluos fieri, cum tam multos nolit saluos fieri. ideo dictum est, quia omnes, qui salui fiunt, nisi ipso uolente non fiunt, et, si quo alio modo illa uerba apostolica intellegi possunt, ut tamen huic apertissimae ueritati, in qua uidemus tam multos uolentibus hominibus sed deo nolente saluos non fieri. contraria esse non possint.

### English translation (Claude)

How can it be said that all human beings would have received it, if those to whom it is not given did not reject it by their own will, because God wills all human beings to be saved, when it is not given to many little children, and very many die without it who have no contrary will; and sometimes, though the parents desire it and hurry, and the ministers too are willing and ready, it is not given because God does not will it, when the one for whom they were running so that he might receive it suddenly dies before it is given? Hence it is plain that those who resist so evident a truth do not understand at all in what sense it was said that God wills all human beings to be saved, when so many are not saved, not because they themselves do not will it but because God does not; which is shown without any obscurity in little children. But just as the saying, “All will be made alive in Christ,” though so many are punished with eternal death, was said because all who receive eternal life receive it only in Christ, so the saying, “God wills all human beings to be saved,” though he does not will so many to be saved, was said because all who are saved are not saved except by his will; and if those apostolic words can be understood in some other way, still they cannot be contrary to this most evident truth, in which we see so many not saved, though men will it, because God does not will it.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 1 Tim 2:4; 1 Cor 15:22. Augustine's restrictive interpretation of 1 Tim 2:4 is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.19 (CSEL 57:417–418; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-19).

## Letter 217.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-20
- Source: CSEL 57:418
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that because grace is withheld justly from others in the same condition, those who receive it receive it freely and not for any merit of will.

### Latin text

Quo modo, ut detur gratia diuina, uoluntas meretur humana. si eis, quibus datur, gratuita misericordia datur, ut uera sit gratia? quo modo in hac re merita pensantur uoluntatis humanae, quando quidem illis, quibus gratia ista non datur, nullo plerumque merito nulla uoluntate distantibus sed unam cum eis, quibus datur, habentibus causam iusto tamen iudicio dei non datur — non enim est iniquitas apud deum —, ut intellegant, quibus datur, quam gratis eis detur, quando iuste utique non daretur, quoniam similem habentibus causam iuste non datur?

### English translation (Claude)

How does the human will merit that divine grace be given, if to those to whom it is given it is given by free mercy, so that it may be true grace? How are the merits of the human will weighed in this matter, since to those to whom this grace is not given, who mostly differ by no merit and no will but have one case with those to whom it is given, it is nevertheless not given by the just judgment of God (for there is no injustice with God), so that those to whom it is given may understand how freely it is given them, since it would certainly not be given them justly, because to those who have a similar case it is justly not given?

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:14: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 9:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.20 (CSEL 57:418; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-20).

## Letter 217.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-21
- Source: CSEL 57:418
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that perseverance to the end is God's gift, since God controls the end of each life.

### Latin text

Quo modo non gratiae dei est non solum credendi uoluntas ab initio uerum etiam perseuerandi usque in finem, cum finis ipse uitae huius non in hominis sed in dei sit potestate et possit utique deus etiam hoc beneficium non perseueraturo conferre, ut rapiatur ex corpore, ne malitia mutet intellectum illius? non enim recipiet homo seu bonum seu malum nisi secundum ea, quae per corpus gessit, non secundum ea, quae, si diutius uiueret. gesturus fuit.

### English translation (Claude)

How is it not of the grace of God that there is not only the will to believe from the beginning but also to persevere to the end, since the end of this life itself is not in man's power but in God's, and God can certainly confer this benefit even on one who will not persevere, that he be snatched from the body lest wickedness change his understanding? For a man will receive good or evil only according to what he has done through the body, not according to what he would have done if he had lived longer.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:10: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Wis 4:11; 2 Cor 5:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.21 (CSEL 57:418; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-21).

## Letter 217.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-22
- Source: CSEL 57:418–419
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the view that God gives or withholds grace from dying infants according to foreseen future wills, since all are judged by deeds done in the body, as Cyprian's On Mortality presupposes.

### Latin text

Quo modo dicitur propterea quibusdam non dari. quibusdam morituris paruulis dei gratia dari, quia eorum futuras praeuidet uoluntates. quas habituri essent, si uiuerent. cum secundum ea, quae per corpus gessit, non secundum ea, quae gesturus esset, si diutius fuisset in corpore, unusquisque recipiat siue bonum siue malum, sicut apostolus definiuit? quo modo secundum futuras uoluntates suas homines iudicantur, quas habituri fuisse dicuntur, si diutius tenerentur in carne, cum dicat scriptura: Felices mortui, qui in domino moriuntur? quorum sine dubio certa et secura felicitas non est, si et ea, quae non egerunt, sed acturi fuerant, si esset eis haec uita prolixior, iudicabit deus. nullumque accipit beneficium, qui rapitur, ne malitia mutet intellectum eius. quia et pro ipsa malitia, cui forsitan imminenti subtractus est, poenas luit, nec gaudendum est de his, quos in fide recta et uita bona nouimus esse defunctos. ne secundum aliqua scelera iudicentur, quae fuerant, si uiuerent, fortasse facturi, nec dolendi uel detestandi sunt hi, qui uitam istam in infidelitate ac perditis moribus finierunt, quia forte, si uiuerent, acturi fuerant paenitentiam pieque uicturi et secundum ista sunt iudicandi, totusque ille de mortalitate liber gloriosissimi martyris Cypriani reprobandus et abiciendus est, in quo tota eius intentio est, ut sciamus bonis fidelibus gratulandum esse morientibus, quoniam uitae huius temptationibus auferuntur deinceps in beatissima securitate mansuri. sed quoniam hoc falsum non est et sine dubitatione felices sunt mortui, qui in domino moriuntur, ridendus et execrandus est error, quo putatur, quod homines secundum suas futuras, quae morientium non sunt futurae. iudicandi sunt uoluntates.

### English translation (Claude)

How can it be said that the grace of God is not given to some, and is given to some little children about to die, because he foresees their future wills, which they would have had if they had lived, when each one receives good or evil according to what he has done through the body, not according to what he would have done if he had been in the body longer, as the apostle laid down? How are human beings judged according to their future wills, which they are said to be going to have had if they had been kept longer in the flesh, when Scripture says, “Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord”? Their happiness is certainly not sure and secure if God will judge also what they did not do but would have done if this life had been longer for them; and the one who is snatched away lest wickedness change his understanding receives no benefit, because he pays the penalty even for the wickedness from which, perhaps imminent, he was withdrawn; and we should not rejoice over those whom we know to have died in right faith and good life, lest they be judged according to some crimes they would perhaps have committed if they had lived; nor should those be mourned or abhorred who ended this life in unbelief and depraved conduct, because perhaps, if they had lived, they would have repented and lived devoutly, and should be judged according to that; and the whole book on mortality of the most glorious martyr Cyprian is to be rejected and cast aside, whose whole aim is that we should know that good believers who die are to be congratulated, since they are taken away from the temptations of this life, to remain thenceforth in most blessed security. But since this is not false, and beyond doubt blessed are the dead who die in the Lord, the error is to be laughed at and abhorred by which it is thought that human beings are to be judged according to their future wills, which are not future for those who die.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 5:10: allusion, high confidence
- Rev 14:13: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence
- Cyprian, Mort. (On Mortality): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 14:13; Wis 4:11; Cyprian, On Mortality.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.22 (CSEL 57:418–419; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-22).

## Letter 217.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-23
- Source: CSEL 57:419–420
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that it is the opponents of grace who undermine free will, and that God prepares the will by hidden inspiration, not merely by teaching.

### Latin text

Quo modo dicuntur negare liberum uoluntatis arbitrium. qui confitentur omnem hominem, quisquis suo corde credit in deum, non nisi sua libera credere uoluntate, cum potius illi oppugnent arbitrium liberum, qui oppugnant dei gratiam, qua uere ad bona eligenda et agenda fit liberum? quo modo dicitur, quod per legem dei atque doctrinam scripturarum fiat, quod eadem scriptura dixit: Praeparatur uoluntas a domino, ac non potius per occultam inspirationem gratiae dei, quando quidem pro eis, qui eidem doctrinae contradicentes nolunt ei credere, ipsum deum fide recta rogamus. ut uelint?

### English translation (Claude)

How can those be said to deny the free choice of the will who confess that every human being who believes in God with his heart believes only by his own free will, when it is rather those who attack the grace of God, by which it is truly made free to choose and do good, who attack free choice? How can it be said that what the same Scripture said, “The will is prepared by the Lord,” is done through the law of God and the teaching of the Scriptures, and not rather through the hidden inspiration of the grace of God, since for those who contradict that same teaching and refuse to believe it we ask God himself, with right faith, that they may be willing?

### Scripture references

- Prov 8:35: quotation, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Prov 8:35 (LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.23 (CSEL 57:419–420; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-23).

## Letter 217.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-24
- Source: CSEL 57:420–421
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from the churches' praise of God for Paul's conversion that God himself turns unwilling persecutors into willing believers.

### Latin text

Quo modo deus expectat uoluntates hominum, ut praeueniant eum, quibus det gratiam. cum gratias ei non inmerito agamus de his, quibus non ei credentibus et eius doctrinam uoluntate impia persequentibus misericordiam praerogauit eosque ad se ipsum omnipotentissima facilitate conuertit et uolentes ex nolentibus fecit? ut quid ei inde gratias agimus, si hoc ipse non fecit? ut quid tanto magis eum magnificamus, quanto magis nolebant credere, quos credidisse gaudemus, si gratia diuina uoluntas in melius non mutatur humana? apostolus Paulus: Eram, inquit, ignotus facie ecclesiis Iudaeae, quae sunt in Christo; tantum autem audiebant, quia, qui aliquando nos persequebatur, nunc euangelizat fidem, quam aliquando uastabat, et in me magnificabant deum. ut quid magnificabant deum, si non deus ad se ipsum cor illius uiri suae gratiae bonitate conuerterat quando, ut ipse confitetur, misericordiam consecutus est, ut fidelis esset ea fide, quam aliquando uastabat? ipsum etiam uerbum, quod posuit, quem nisi deum hoc tam magnum bonum fecisse declarat? quid est enim in me magnificabant deum, nisi in me deum magnificum praedicabant? quo modo autem eum magnificum praedicabant, si magnum illud factum de Pauli conuersione ipse non fecerat, et quo pacto ipse fecerat, si uolentem credere ex nolente ipse non fecerat?

### English translation (Claude)

How does God wait for the wills of human beings to go before him, so that he may give them grace, when we rightly give him thanks for those to whom, while they did not believe him and persecuted his teaching with impious will, he extended mercy beforehand, and converted them to himself with almighty ease, and made them willing from unwilling? Why do we give him thanks for this if he did not do it? Why do we magnify him the more, the more unwilling to believe were those whom we rejoice to have believed, if the human will is not changed for the better by divine grace? The apostle Paul says: “I was unknown by face to the churches of Judea that are in Christ; they only heard that he who once persecuted us now preaches the faith he once ravaged; and they magnified God in me.” Why did they magnify God, if God had not converted to himself the heart of that man by the goodness of his grace, when, as he himself confesses, he obtained mercy to be faithful in that faith which he once ravaged? And the very word he used, whom does it declare to have done so great a good, if not God? For what does “they magnified God in me” mean, if not “they proclaimed God great in me”? But how did they proclaim him great, if he himself had not done that great deed of Paul's conversion; and how had he done it, if he himself had not made him willing to believe from unwilling?

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:22–24: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:25: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 1:13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Gal 1:22–24; 1 Cor 7:25; 1 Tim 1:13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.24 (CSEL 57:420–421; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-24).

## Letter 217.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-25
- Source: CSEL 57:421
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the twelve propositions show that grace precedes the will, and invites Vitalis to reply if he rejects any of them.

### Latin text

Nempe manifestum est ex illis duodecim sententiis, quas pertinere ad catholicam fidem negare non sineris, non solum omnibus uerum etiam singulis id confici, ut confiteamur gratia dei praeueniri hominum uoluntates et per hanc eas potius praeparari, quam propter earum meritum dari. aut si aliquid earum duodecim esse uerum negas, quarum propterea commendo etiam numerum, ut facilius memoriae mandentur distinctiusque teneantur, non te pigeat rescribere, ut sciam et ea, quam mihi dominus dederit. facultate respondeam. ego enim haereticum quidem Pelagianum te esse non credo, sed ita te esse nolo, ut nihil illius ad te transeat uel in te relinquatur erroris.

### English translation (Claude)

Surely it is plain from those twelve propositions, which you are not allowed to deny belong to the Catholic faith, that from all of them, and from each one of them, it follows that we confess that the wills of human beings are anticipated by the grace of God, and are rather prepared by it than that it is given because of their merit. Or if you deny that any of those twelve is true (I emphasize their number so that they may be committed to memory more easily and held more distinctly), do not mind writing back, so that I may know and answer with such ability as the Lord gives me. For I do not believe that you are a Pelagian heretic; but I do not want you to be such that anything of that error passes over to you or remains in you.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.25 (CSEL 57:421; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-25).

## Letter 217.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-26
- Source: CSEL 57:421–422
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks whether Vitalis will forbid the Church's prayers for unbelievers or refuse to say Amen to them, or accuse Cyprian of error.

### Latin text

Sed inter haec duodecim reperies forte aliquid. quod negandum uel dubitandum putes et unde nos operosius disputare compellas. numquid et orare prohibebis ecclesiam pro infidelibus. ut sint fideles, pro his, qui nolunt credere, ut uelint credere. pro his, qui ab eius lege doctrinaque dissentiunt, ut legi eius doctrinaeque consentiant, ut det illis deus, quod per prophetam promisit, cor cognoscendi eum et aures audientes, quas utique acceperant, de quibus saluator ipse dicebat: Qui habet aures audiendi, audiat? numquid, ubi audieris sacerdotem dei ad eius altare populum hortantem ad deum orandum uel ipsum clara uoce orantem, ut incredulas gentes ad fidem suam uenire compellat, non respondebis: (Amen)? aut etiam huius fidei sanitati contraria disputabis? numquid beatissimum Cyprianum in hoc errasse clamabis uel susurrabis, ubi pro inimicis fidei Christianae, ut etiam ipsi ad eam conuertantur, orare nos docet?

### English translation (Claude)

But perhaps among these twelve you will find something you think should be denied or doubted, and on which you would compel us to argue at greater length. Will you also forbid the Church to pray for unbelievers that they may be believers; for those who refuse to believe, that they may be willing to believe; for those who dissent from his law and teaching, that they may assent to his law and teaching; that God may give them what he promised through the prophet, a heart to know him and ears that hear, which those had certainly received of whom the Savior himself said, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear”? When you hear the priest of God at his altar exhorting the people to pray to God, or himself praying aloud, that he may compel the unbelieving nations to come to his faith, will you not answer, “Amen”? Or will you even argue against the soundness of this faith? Will you cry out or whisper that the most blessed Cyprian erred in this, where he teaches us to pray for the enemies of the Christian faith, that they too may be converted to it?

### Scripture references

- Jer 24:7: allusion, high confidence
- Deut 29:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 11:15: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cyprian, Dom. or. 17 (On the Lord's Prayer): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Jer 24:7 (Bar 2:31); Deut 29:4; Matt 11:15; Cyprian, On the Lord's Prayer 17. The “compel” of the liturgical prayer is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.26 (CSEL 57:421–422; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-26).

## Letter 217.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-27
- Source: CSEL 57:422–423
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Paul's prayers for the Jews and his request that the Thessalonians pray for the word's progress, arguing that God himself makes unbelievers believe in answer to prayer.

### Latin text

Numquid postremo apostolum Paulum pro Iudaeis infidelibus habentem talia uota culpabis? de quibus ait: Bona uoluntas quidem cordis mei et deprecatio ad deum pro illis in salutem. qui etiam Thessalonicensibus dicit: De cetero, fratres, orate pro nobis, ut uerbum domini currat et glorificetur sicut etiam apud uos, ut eruamur ab iniquis et malis hominibus; non enim omnium est fides. quo modo curreret et glorificaretur uerbum dei nisi ad fidem conuersis eis. quibus praedicaretur, quando quidem iam credentibus dicit: Quem ad modum et apud uos? scit certe hoc ab illo fieri, quem uult rogari, ut hoc faciat, etiam ut eruatur ab iniquis et malis hominibus. qui profecto et illis orantibus non erant credituri. propter quod addidit: Non enim omnium est fides, tamquam diceret: Non enim apud omnes etiam uobis orantibus glorificabitur uerbum dei, quia ipsi utique fuerant credituri, qui ordinati erant in uitam aeternam, praedestinati in adoptionem filiorum per Iesum Christum in ipsum et electi in ipso ante mundi constitutionem. sed ideo deus per orationes credentium nondum credentes credere facit, ut ostendat, quia ipse facit; nemo est enim tam inperitus, tam carnalis, tam tardus ingenio, qui non uideat deum facere, quod rogari se praecipit ut faciat.

### English translation (Claude)

Finally, will you blame the apostle Paul for having such desires for the unbelieving Jews, of whom he says, “The good will of my heart and my prayer to God for them is for their salvation”? He also says to the Thessalonians, “Finally, brothers, pray for us, that the word of the Lord may run and be glorified, as it is among you, and that we may be delivered from wicked and evil men; for not all have faith.” How would the word of God run and be glorified, except by the conversion to the faith of those to whom it was preached, since to those who already believe he says, “As it is among you”? He certainly knows that this is done by him whom he wants asked to do it, as also that he may be delivered from wicked and evil men, who certainly would not believe even if they prayed; for this reason he added, “For not all have faith,” as though he said, “For not among all, even if you pray, will the word of God be glorified,” because those were to believe who were ordained to eternal life, predestined to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to himself, and chosen in him before the foundation of the world. But God makes those not yet believing believe through the prayers of believers precisely to show that he himself does it; for no one is so unskilled, so carnal, so slow of mind as not to see that God does what he commands that he be asked to do.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:1: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Thess 3:1–2: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 1:4–5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:1; 2 Thess 3:1–2; Acts 13:48; Eph 1:4–5. Augustine's teaching on predestination is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.27 (CSEL 57:422–423; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-27).

## Letter 217.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-28
- Source: CSEL 57:423
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that God removes the heart of stone and prepares the will, as both prayer for unbelievers and thanksgiving for believers show.

### Latin text

Haec et alia testimonia diuina, quae commemorare longum est, ostendunt deum gratia sua auferre infidelibus cor lapideum et praeuenire in hominibus bonarum merita uoluntatum, ita ut uoluntas per antecedentem gratiam praeparetur, non ut gratia merito uoluntatis antecedente donetur. hoc et gratiarum actio indicat, quod oratio, oratio pro infidelibus, gratiarum actio pro fidelibus. qui enim est orandus, ut faciat, illi est actio gratiarum reddenda. cum fecerit. unde idem dicit apostolus ad Ephesios: Propter hoc et ego audita fide uestra in domino Iesu et in omnes sanctos non cesso gratias agere pro uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

These and other divine testimonies, which it would take long to recount, show that God by his grace takes away from unbelievers the heart of stone and anticipates in human beings the merits of good wills, so that the will is prepared by preceding grace, not that grace is given for the preceding merit of the will. Thanksgiving shows this as well as prayer: prayer for unbelievers, thanksgiving for believers. For thanks must be rendered, when he has done it, to the one who must be asked to do it. Hence the same apostle says to the Ephesians: “For this reason I too, having heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love toward all the saints, do not cease to give thanks for you.”

### Scripture references

- Ezek 36:26: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 1:15–16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ezek 36:26; Eph 1:15–16 (Augustine's text has “and toward all the saints”, without “love”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.28 (CSEL 57:423; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-28).

## Letter 217.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-29
- Source: CSEL 57:423–424
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes Vitalis's view from full Pelagianism: Vitalis grants that grace aids believers but holds that the beginning of faith comes from ourselves, which the Church's prayers refute.

### Latin text

Loquimur autem nunc de ipsis initiis, cum homines. qui erant auersi et aduersi, conuertuntur ad deum et uelle incipiunt. quod nolebant, et habere fidem, quam non habebant. quod ut fiat in eis, oratur pro eis, quamuis non oretur ab eis: ipsi enim quo modo inuocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? cum uero factum fuerit, quod oratur, ei, qui fecit, aguntur gratiae et pro eis et ab eis. de orationibus autem iam fidelium, quas et pro se et pro aliis fidelibus faciunt, ut proficiant in eo, quod esse coeperunt, et de gratiarum actionibus, quia proficiunt, confligendum tecum esse non puto; contra Pelagianos est iste conflictus tibi nobisque communis. illi quippe omnia ad fidelem piamque uitam hominum pertinentia ita tribuunt libero uoluntatis arbitrio, ut habenda ex nobis. non a domino putent esse poscenda; tu autem, si ea, quae de te audio, uera sunt, initium fidei, ubi est etiam initium bonae, hoc est piae uoluntatis, non uis esse donum dei, sed ex nobis nos habere contendis, ut credere incipiamus; cetera autem religiosae uitae bona deum per gratiam suam iam ex fide petentibus, quaerentibus, pulsantibus donare consentis. nec adtendis ideo pro infidelibus deum rogari, ut credant, quoniam deus donat et fidem; ideo pro eis, qui crediderint, deo gratias agi, quoniam donat et fidem.

### English translation (Claude)

But we are now speaking of the very beginnings, when people who were turned away and opposed are converted to God and begin to will what they did not will, and to have the faith they did not have. That this may happen in them, prayer is made for them, although it is not made by them; for how will they call on him in whom they have not believed? But when what is prayed for has been done, thanks are given to him who did it, both for them and by them. As for the prayers of those who already believe, which they make both for themselves and for other believers, that they may make progress in what they have begun to be, and the thanksgivings because they make progress, I do not think I need to contend with you; this is a contest common to you and us against the Pelagians. For they attribute everything belonging to the faithful and devout life of human beings to the free choice of the will in such a way as to think that it is to be had from ourselves, not asked of the Lord. But you, if what I hear of you is true, do not want the beginning of faith, where there is also the beginning of a good, that is, a devout, will, to be a gift of God, but contend that we have it from ourselves to begin to believe; while you agree that God by his grace gives the other goods of the religious life to those who, already from faith, ask, seek, and knock. And you do not consider that prayer is made to God for unbelievers that they may believe precisely because God gives faith too; and that thanks are given to God for those who have believed precisely because he gives faith too.

### Scripture references

- Rom 10:14: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 10:14; Matt 7:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.29 (CSEL 57:423–424; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-29).

## Letter 217.30

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-30
- Source: CSEL 57:424–425
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that if Vitalis accepts prayer and thanksgiving for the conversion of unbelievers, he must confess that God's grace precedes and changes the human will.

### Latin text

Quam ob rem, ut hunc ad te sermonem aliquando concludam, si negas orandum esse, ut, qui nolunt credere, uelint credere, si negas agendas esse deo gratias, quoniam credere uoluerunt. qui nolebant credere, aliter tecum agendum est, ut non sic erres aut, si errare persistis, ne mittas alios in errorem. si autem, quod de te magis credo, sentis atque consentis orare nos deum debere ac solere pro nolentibus credere, ut uelint credere, et pro eis, qui aduersantur et contradicunt legi eius atque doctrinae, ut ei cedant eamque sectentur. si sentis atque consentis debere nos etiam deo agere gratias ac solere pro talibus, quod ad eius fidem doctrinamque conuersi uolentes ex nolentibus fiunt, oportet sine dubitatione fatearis uoluntates hominum dei gratia praeueniri et, ut bonum uelint homines. quod nolebant, deum facere. qui rogatur, ut faciat, et cui nos nouimus agere gratias dignum et iustum esse, cum fecerit. dominus tibi det intellectum in omnibus, domine frater.

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, to conclude at last this discourse to you: if you deny that prayer should be made that those who refuse to believe may be willing to believe, if you deny that thanks should be given to God because those who refused to believe have become willing to believe, you must be dealt with otherwise, so that you may not err in this way, or, if you persist in erring, that you may not lead others into error. But if, as I rather believe of you, you hold and agree that we ought to pray to God, and are accustomed to pray, for those who refuse to believe, that they may be willing to believe, and for those who oppose and contradict his law and teaching, that they may yield to it and follow it; if you hold and agree that we ought also to give thanks to God, and are accustomed to give them, for such people, because, converted to his faith and teaching, they become willing from unwilling; then you must confess without hesitation that the wills of human beings are anticipated by the grace of God, and that God, who is asked to do it, and to whom we know it is worthy and just to give thanks when he has done it, makes human beings will the good that they did not will. May the Lord give you understanding in all things, my lord brother.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:7: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- 2 Tim 2:7. “It is worthy and just” echoes the response of the eucharistic preface.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 217.30 (CSEL 57:424–425; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-217-30).

## Letter 218.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-1
- Source: CSEL 57:425–426
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejoices at the young Palatinus's turning to the religious life and offers him encouragement.

### Latin text

Conuersatio tua fortior atque fructuosior ad dominum deum nostrum magnum nobis adtulit gaudium. elegisti enim a iuuentute doctrinam, ut inuenias usque ad canos sapientiam. cani sunt ergo sensus hominis et senectutis aetas uita inmaculata. quam donet tibi dominus petenti, quaerenti atque pulsanti, qui nouit bona data dare filiis suis. quamuis enim tibi abundent exhortatores et exhortationes ad uiam salutis et gloriae sempiternae, maxime ipsa gratia Christi. quae tibi tam salubriter in tuo corde locuta est, tamen etiam nos pro dilectionis officio, quam tibi debemus, adferimus aliquid exhortationis in hac resalutatione nostra, qua te non pigrum uel dormientem excitemus, sed prouocemus incitemusque currentem.

### English translation (Claude)

Your stronger and more fruitful turning to the Lord our God has brought us great joy. For you have chosen instruction from your youth, so that you may find wisdom even to grey hairs. For understanding is a man's grey hair, and a spotless life is the age of old age. May the Lord grant you this as you ask, seek, and knock, he who knows how to give good gifts to his children. For although you have plenty of exhorters and exhortations to the way of salvation and of eternal glory, above all the very grace of Christ, which has spoken so wholesomely to you in your heart, still we too, from the duty of love that we owe you, bring some exhortation in this return of your greeting, by which we do not rouse you as sluggish or asleep, but challenge and spur you on as you run.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 7:11: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 6:18 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 4:9 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Palatinus, a young man who had taken up the religious life (ca. 427). Sir 6:18; Wis 4:8–9; Matt 7:7, 11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 218.1 (CSEL 57:425–426; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-1).

## Letter 218.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-2
- Source: CSEL 57:426–427
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Palatinus to persevere by trusting not in his own strength but in God, who gives the love poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit.

### Latin text

Sapere te oportet. fili, ut perseueres, quia sapuisti. ut eligeres. sit hoc ipsum sapientiae tuae scire. cuius donum hoc est. reuela ad dominum uiam tuam et spera in eum et ipse faciet et deducet uelut lumen iustitiam tuam et iudicium tuum uelut meridiem. ipse faciet rectos cursus tuos et itinera tua in pace producet. sicut spreuisti. quod sperabas in saeculo, ne in abundantia diuitiarum gloriareris, quas more filiorum saeculi huius concupiscere coeperas, ita nunc ad tollendum iugum domini et eius sarcinam in uirtute tua non confidas et illud lene erit et haec leuis. pariter quippe inprobantur in psalmo, et qui confidunt in uirtute sua et qui in abundantia diuitiarum suarum gloriantur. ergo diuitiarum gloriam non iam habebas, sed, quam habere cupiebas, prudentissime contempsisti. caue, ne tibi subrepat in tua uirtute confidere: homo es enim et maledictus omnis, qui spem suam ponit in homine. sed plane in deo tuo toto corde confide et ipse erit uirtus tua, in qua pius gratusque confidas, cui dicas humiliter et fideliter: Diligam te, domine, uirtus mea, quia et ipsa caritas dei, quae perfecta foras mittit timorem, non per uires nostras, id est humanas diffunditur in cordibus nostris sed, sicut dicit apostolus, per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

You must be wise, son, so as to persevere, since you were wise so as to choose. Let it be part of your wisdom to know whose gift this is. “Reveal your way to the Lord and hope in him, and he will do it, and he will bring forth your righteousness like the light and your judgment like the noonday.” “He will make your paths straight and lead your journeys forward in peace.” Just as you despised what you hoped for in the world, so as not to glory in the abundance of riches, which you had begun to desire after the manner of the children of this age, so now, in taking up the Lord's yoke and his burden, do not trust in your own strength, and the yoke will be easy and the burden light. For in the psalm both those who trust in their own strength and those who glory in the abundance of their riches are equally condemned. So you no longer had the glory of riches, but very wisely despised what you desired to have. Beware lest trust in your own strength creep upon you; for you are a man, and cursed is everyone who puts his hope in man. But trust plainly in your God with your whole heart, and he will be your strength, in which you may trust devoutly and gratefully, and to whom you may say humbly and faithfully, “I will love you, Lord, my strength”; because the very love of God, which, being perfect, casts out fear, is poured into our hearts not by our own powers, that is, human ones, but, as the apostle says, by the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 37:5–6 (36:5-Ps LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Prov 4:27: quotation, medium confidence
- Luke 16:8: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 11:29–30: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 49:6 (48:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Jer 17:5: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 3:5: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 18:1 (17:2 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:18: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Ps 37:5–6; Prov 4:27 (LXX); Luke 16:8; Matt 11:29–30; Ps 49:6; Jer 17:5; Prov 3:5; Ps 18:1; 1 John 4:18; Rom 5:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 218.2 (CSEL 57:426–427; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-2).

## Letter 218.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-3
- Source: CSEL 57:427
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Palatinus that prayer itself shows our need of God's help to resist temptation, and that the beginning and completion of the good life are God's gifts.

### Latin text

Vigila ergo et ora, ne intres in temptationem. ipsa quippe oratio admonet te, quod indigeas adiutorio domini tui, ne spem bene uiuendi in te ponas. oras enim non iam, ut accipias diuitias et honores praesentis saeculi aut aliquid uanitatis humanae, sed ne intres in temptationem. quod utique si homo sibi praestare posset uolendo, non posceretur orando. quapropter, ut non intremus in temptationem, si uoluntas sufficeret. non oraremus; quae tamen si deesset, nec orare possemus. adsit ergo, ut uelimus: oremus autem, ut ualeamus, quod uoluerimus, cum ipso donante recte sapuerimus. quod bonum quoniam iam cepisti, est, unde gratias agas. quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? si autem accepisti. caue, ne glorieris, quasi non acceperis. hoc est quasi ex te ipso habere potueris. sciens autem, unde acceperis. ab illo pete, ut perficiatur, a quo datum est, ut inciperetur. cum timore itaque et tremore tuam salutem operare. deus est enim, qui operatur in te et uelle et perficere pro bona uoluntate, quoniam praeparatur uoluntas a domino atque ab ipso gressus hominis diriguntur et uiam eius uolet. haec cogitatio sancta seruabit te, ut sapientia tua pietas sit, id est ut ex deo sis bonus et Christi gratiae non ingratus.

### English translation (Claude)

Watch, then, and pray, that you may not enter into temptation. For prayer itself reminds you that you need the help of your Lord, so that you do not place in yourself the hope of living well. For you no longer pray to receive the riches and honors of the present age or anything of human vanity, but that you may not enter into temptation. If a man could provide this for himself by willing, it would certainly not be asked for by praying. So, if the will were enough for us not to enter into temptation, we would not pray; yet if the will were lacking, we could not even pray. Let the will, then, be present, so that we will; but let us pray that we may be able to do what we have willed, when by his gift we have become rightly wise. And since you have already begun this good, you have reason to give thanks. For what do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, beware of boasting as though you had not received it, that is, as though you could have had it from yourself. But knowing from whom you received it, ask him to bring it to completion, by whom it was given you to begin it. So work out your salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God who works in you both to will and to accomplish, for his good will; since the will is prepared by the Lord, and by him the steps of a man are directed, and he will will his way. This holy thought will keep you, so that your wisdom may be godliness, that is, that you may be good from God and not ungrateful to the grace of Christ.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:41: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:6: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:12–13: quotation, high confidence
- Prov 8:35: quotation, medium confidence
- Ps 37:23 (36:23 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Matt 26:41; 1 Cor 4:7; Phil 1:6; Phil 2:12–13; Prov 8:35 (LXX); Ps 37:23 (Old Latin).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 218.3 (CSEL 57:427; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-3).

## Letter 218.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-4
- Source: CSEL 57:427–428
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Palatinus his parents' greetings and thanks him for the gift of haircloth, a reminder of humility in prayer.

### Latin text

Desiderant te parentes tui fideliter congratulantes meliori spei tuae, quam in domino habere coepisti. nos autem te siue absentem corpore siue praesentem in uno spiritu habere cupimus, per quem diffunditur caritas in cordibus nostris, ut, quolibet loco fuerit caro nostra. nullo modo separata esse possit anima nostra. gratissime accepimus cilicia, quae misisti, ubi nos de frequentanda et seruanda humilitate orationum prior ipse monuisti.

### English translation (Claude)

Your parents long for you, rejoicing faithfully in the better hope that you have begun to have in the Lord. And we desire to have you, whether absent or present in body, in the one Spirit through whom love is poured into our hearts, so that, wherever our flesh may be, our soul may in no way be separated. We received most gratefully the haircloth garments that you sent, in which you were the first to remind us of practicing and keeping humility in prayers.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:5: allusion, high confidence
- Col 2:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Rom 5:5; Col 2:5. Haircloth (cilicium) was worn in penance and prayer.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 218.4 (CSEL 57:427–428; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-218-4).

## Letter 219.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-1
- Source: CSEL 57:428–429
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine and other African bishops tell the bishops of Gaul that they have received and corrected the monk Leporius, who had denied that God was made man and so introduced a fourth person into the Trinity.

### Latin text

Filium nostrum Leporium apud uestram sanctitatem pro sui erroris praesumptione merito idoneeque correptum, cum ad nos, posteaquam exinde exturbatus est, aduenisset, salubriter perturbatum corrigendum sanandumque suscepimus. nam sicut uos oboedistis apostolo, ut corriperetis inquietos, ita et nos, ut consolaremur pusillanimes et susciperemus infirmos. cum enim praeoccupatus esset homo in aliquo delicto eodemque non paruo et de unigenito filio dei, quod erat in principio uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum, cum autem uenit plenitudo temporis, uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis, non recta quaedam saperet nec uera sentiret negans deum hominem factum, ne uidelicet substantiae diuinae, qua aequalis est patri. indigna mutatio uel corruptio sequeretur, nec uidens quartam se subintroducere in trinitate personam, quod a sanitate fidei symbolique catholici ueritate prorsus alienum est, eum, sicut potuimus, adiuuante domino instruximus in spiritu lenitatis, praesertim quia, cum hoc uideret, uas electionis adiecit: Intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tempteris, ne ita se quidam ad prouectum spiritalem peruenisse gauderent, ut iam non posse temptari tamquam homines putarent, addiditque salubrem pacificamque sententiam, ut alter alterius onera portemus. quoniam sic implebimus legem Christi; qui enim putat se aliquid esse, cum nihil sit, se ipsum seducit, dilectissimi et honorabiles fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

Our son Leporius, who had been rightly and fittingly rebuked by Your Holiness for the presumption of his error, came to us after he was driven out from there, and we received him, wholesomely shaken, to be corrected and healed. For just as you obeyed the apostle in rebuking the restless, so we obeyed him in comforting the faint-hearted and supporting the weak. For since the man had been overtaken in a fault, and that no small one, and concerning the only-begotten Son of God, who in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and when the fullness of time came, the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, he held some things that were not right and thought what was not true, denying that God was made man, lest, namely, an unworthy change or corruption should follow for the divine substance, by which he is equal to the Father; and not seeing that he was introducing a fourth person into the Trinity, which is entirely foreign to the soundness of the faith and the truth of the Catholic creed, we instructed him as best we could, with the Lord's help, in a spirit of gentleness; especially since, when he saw this, the chosen vessel added, “Looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted,” so that some should not rejoice that they had reached such spiritual progress as to think, though human, that they could no longer be tempted; and he added a wholesome and peaceable precept, that we bear one another's burdens, since so we shall fulfil the law of Christ; for whoever thinks he is something, when he is nothing, deceives himself, dearest and honorable brothers.

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 5:14: allusion, high confidence
- Gal 6:1–3: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence
- Gal 4:4: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:15: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Augustine and other African bishops (NPNF names Florentius and Secundinus as co-senders) to Proculus and Cylinnius, bishops in Gaul. 1 Thess 5:14; Gal 6:1–3; John 1:1, 14; Gal 4:4; Acts 9:15 (“chosen vessel”). Leporius's error and its correction are described as the bishops state them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 219.1 (CSEL 57:428–429; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-1).

## Letter 219.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-2
- Source: CSEL 57:429–430
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The African bishops say that the Gallic bishops' condemnation and their own gentle correction were both God's work in healing Leporius, and ask that he be received back.

### Latin text

Quam tamen eius emendationem nequaquam fortassis implere possemus, nisi uos ante, quae in eo mendosa fuerant damnaretis. idem igitur dominus et medicus noster utens uasis ac ministris suis, qui dixit: Ego percutiam et ego sanabo, per uos percussit tumentem, per nos sanauit dolentem; idem suae domus administrator atque prouisor per uos destruxit male constructa. per nos aedificauit. quae fuerant construenda; idem diligens agricola possessionis suae sterilia per uos eradicauit et noxia, utilia per nos et fecunda plantauit. non itaque nobis sed eius misericordiae demus gloriam. in cuius manu sumus et nos et sermones nostri. et sicut in supra dicto filio nostro ministerium uestrum humilitas nostra laudauit, sic etiam sanctitas uestra de nostro ministerio gratuletur. paterno igitur et fraterno corde suscipite a nobis misericordi lenitate correctum, sicut nos suscepimus a uobis misericordi seueritate correptum. etsi enim aliud per uos aliud per nos, utrumque tamen fraternae saluti necessarium una caritas fecit. unus ergo deus fecit, quoniam deus caritas est.

### English translation (Claude)

Yet we could perhaps by no means have accomplished his correction, had you not first condemned what was faulty in him. So the same Lord and our physician, using his vessels and ministers, who said, “I will strike and I will heal,” struck the swollen man through you and healed the suffering man through us; the same steward and provider of his house destroyed through you what was badly built, and built through us what was to be built; the same diligent farmer of his estate rooted out through you what was barren and harmful, and planted through us what was useful and fruitful. So let us give the glory not to ourselves but to his mercy, in whose hand are both we and our words. And just as our humility has praised your ministry in the case of our son mentioned above, so may Your Holiness also rejoice at our ministry. Receive, then, with a fatherly and brotherly heart, him who has been corrected by us with merciful gentleness, as we received him rebuked by you with merciful severity. For though one thing was done through you and another through us, one love did both, each necessary for a brother's salvation. So one God did it, since God is love.

### Scripture references

- Deut 32:39: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:8: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:16 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Deut 32:39; Wis 7:16; 1 John 4:8, 16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 219.2 (CSEL 57:429–430; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-2).

## Letter 219.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-3
- Source: CSEL 57:430–431
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The African bishops explain that Leporius, fearing change in God, had separated the Son of Man from the Son of God, but now confesses Christ as one, God and man, with both natures unchanged, and has signed a retraction.

### Latin text

Proinde sicut per suam praesentiam est susceptus a nobis. sic per suam epistulam suscipiatur a uobis. cui quidem epistulae nostra etiam manu subscribendum putauimus ipsius esse testantes. admonitus quippe facile uidit deum hominem factum, quia uerbum caro factum est et deus erat uerbum eumque apostolus docuit hoc esse factum non perdendo. quod erat, sed adsumendo, quod non erat; semet ipsum enim exinaniuit non formam dei amittens sed formam serui accipiens. hoc namque iste metuebat, quando nolebat fateri deum natum ex femina, deum crucifixum et alia humana perpessum, ne diuinitas in homine commutata uel hominis permixtione corrupta crederetur: pius timor sed incautus error: pie uidit diuinitatem non posse mutari, sed incaute praesumpsit filium hominis a filio dei posse separari, ut alius iste alius ille sit et ut alter eorum Christus non sit aut Christi duo sint. sed posteaquam cognouit dei uerbum, hoc est unigenitum dei filium sic esse factum hominis filium, ut neutrum in alterum uersum sit, sed utroque in sua substantia permanente sic deus in homine pateretur humana, ut in se ipso integra diuina seruaret, Christum deum hominem sine ullo timore confessus est magisque timuit in trinitate quartae personae additamentum quam in diuinitate illud substantiae detrimentum. hanc eius correctionem dilectionem uestram minime dubitamus et gratanter accipere et eis notam facere, quibus eius error scandalum fuit, quia et illi, qui cum eo uenerunt ad nos. cum illo correcti atque sanati sunt, sicut eorum subscriptionibus, quae coram nobis factae sunt, tenetur expressum. superest, ut de fraterna salute laeti rescriptis beatitudinis uestrae nos uicissim laetificare dignemini. optamus uos, dilectissimi et honorabiles fratres, in domino bene ualere nostri memores.

### English translation (Claude)

Accordingly, just as he was received by us in person, so let him be received by you through his letter, which we thought should also be signed in our own hand, testifying that it is his. For when admonished he readily saw that God was made man, because the Word was made flesh and the Word was God; and the apostle taught that this was done not by losing what he was but by taking what he was not; for he emptied himself, not losing the form of God but taking the form of a servant. For this is what he feared when he would not confess that God was born of a woman, that God was crucified and suffered other human things: that the divinity might be believed to be changed in the man or corrupted by mixture with the man. It was a devout fear but an incautious error: devoutly he saw that the divinity cannot be changed, but incautiously he presumed that the Son of Man could be separated from the Son of God, so that one is one and the other another, and that either one of them is not Christ or there are two Christs. But after he recognized that the Word of God, that is, the only-begotten Son of God, was so made the son of man that neither was changed into the other, but, each remaining in its own substance, God so suffered human things in the man that he kept the divine things intact in himself, he confessed without any fear Christ as God and man, and feared more the addition of a fourth person in the Trinity than that loss of substance in the divinity. We have no doubt that Your Love will gladly receive this correction of his and make it known to those to whom his error was a scandal; for those too who came to us with him were corrected and healed with him, as is set down in their signatures, made in our presence. It remains for you, glad at a brother's salvation, to be good enough to gladden us in turn with a reply from Your Blessedness. We wish you, dearest and honorable brothers, good health in the Lord, and that you remember us.

### Scripture references

- John 1:14: quotation, high confidence
- John 1:1: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:6–7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- John 1:14, 1; Phil 2:6–7. Leporius's retraction is the Libellus emendationis. The Christological statements are translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 219.3 (CSEL 57:430–431; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/217-16/#p-219-3).

## Letter 220.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-1
- Source: CSEL 57:431–432
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Count Boniface by the deacon Paul, wishing to speak not of his power or bodily safety but of the salvation Christ promised.

### Latin text

Fideliorem hominem et qui faciliores haberet accessus ad aures tuas ferens litteras meas, numquam potui reperire, quam nunc dominus obtulit seruum et ministrum Christi diaconum Paulum ambobus nobis carissimum, ut aliquid tibi loquerer non pro potentia tua et honore, quem geris in isto saeculo maligno. nec pro incolumitate carnis tuae corruptibilis atque mortalis. quia et ipsa transitoria est et, quam diu sit, semper incertum est, sed pro illa salute, quam nobis promisit Christus, qui propterea hic exhonoratus atque crucifixus est, ut doceret nos bona saeculi huius magis contemnere quam diligere et hoc amare et sperare ab illo, quod in sua resurrectione monstrauit; resurrexit enim a mortuis nec iam moritur et mors ei ultra non dominabitur.

### English translation (Claude)

I could never have found a more faithful man, or one with readier access to your ears, to carry a letter of mine than the one the Lord has now provided: the servant and minister of Christ, the deacon Paul, very dear to us both. So I may say something to you, not about your power and the rank you hold in this evil world, nor about the safety of your corruptible and mortal flesh, since that too is passing and how long it will last is always uncertain, but about that salvation which Christ promised us. For this reason he was dishonored and crucified here, to teach us to despise rather than love the goods of this world, and to love and hope from him for what he showed in his resurrection; for he has risen from the dead and “dies no more, and death will no longer have dominion over him.”

### Scripture references

- Rom 6:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Addressed to Boniface, count of Africa (ca. 427); the address printed in the editions is not in the digital text. Quotation: Rom 6:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.1 (CSEL 57:431–432; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-1).

## Letter 220.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-2
- Source: CSEL 57:432
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he never found an opportunity to counsel Boniface for his soul's sake and had not dared to write during his dangers.

### Latin text

Scio non deesse homines, qui te secundum uitam mundi huius diligunt et secundum ipsam tibi dant consilia aliquando utilia aliquando inutilia, quia homines sunt et. sicut possunt, ad praesens sapiunt nescientes, quid contingat sequenti diei. secundum autem deum, ne pereat anima tua, non facile tibi quisquam consulit, non quia desunt, qui hoc faciant, sed quia difficile est inuenire, quando tecum ista possint loqui. nam et ego semper desideraui et numquam inueni locum uel tempus, ut agerem tecum, quod me agere oportebat cum homine. quem multum diligo in Christo. scis autem, qualem me apud Hipponem uideris, quando ad me uenire dignatus es, quia uix loquebar inbecillitate corporis fatigatus. nunc ergo, fili, audi me saltem per litteras tibi sermocinantem, quas in periculis tuis numquam tibi mittere potui periculum cogitans perlatoris et cauens, ne ad eos, ad quos nollem, mea epistula perueniret. unde peto, ut ignoscas, si putas me plus timuisse quam debui; tamen dixi, quod timui.

### English translation (Claude)

I know there is no lack of people who love you according to the life of this world and give you advice according to it, sometimes useful, sometimes useless, because they are human beings and are wise, as far as they can be, for the present, not knowing what will happen the next day. But according to God, so that your soul may not perish, no one easily gives you counsel; not because there are none who would do so, but because it is hard to find a time when they can speak of these things with you. For I too have always wished, and never found, the place or the time to do with you what I ought to do with a man whom I love dearly in Christ. You know in what state you saw me at Hippo when you deigned to come to me: I could hardly speak, worn out by bodily weakness. Now then, my son, listen to me at least as I talk with you by letter. In your times of danger I could never send you one, thinking of the danger to the bearer and taking care that my letter should not reach those I did not want it to reach. So I ask you to forgive me if you think I was more afraid than I should have been; still, I have said what I feared.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.2 (CSEL 57:432; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-2).

## Letter 220.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-3
- Source: CSEL 57:432–433
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds Boniface that after his first wife's death he wished to become a monk, and was persuaded instead to defend the churches while living in continence.

### Latin text

Audi ergo me, immo dominum deum nostrum per ministerium infirmitatis meae; recole, qualis fueris adhuc in corpore constituta religiosae memoriae priore coniuge tua et recenti eius obitu quo modo tibi uanitas saeculi huius horruerit et quo modo concupieris seruitutem dei. nos nouimus, nos testes sumus, quid nobiscum apud Tubunas de animo et uoluntate tua fueris conlocutus. soli tecum eramus ego et frater Alypius. non enim existimo tantum ualuisse terrenas curas, quibus impletus es, ut hoc de memoria tua penitus delere potuerint. nempe omnes actus publicos, quibus occupatus eras, relinquere cupiebas et te in otium sanctum conferre atque in ea uita uiuere, in qua serui dei monachi uiuunt. ut autem non faceres, quid te reuocauit. nisi quia considerasti ostendentibus nobis, quantum prodesset Christi ecclesiis. quod agebas, si ea sola intentione ageres, ut defensae ab infestationibus barbarorum quietam et tranquillam uitam agerent, sicut dicit apostolus, in omni pietate et castitate, tu autem nihil ex hoc mundo quaereres nisi ea, quae necessaria essent huic uitae sustentandae tuae ac tuorum, accinctus balteo castissimae continentiae et inter arma corporalia spiritalibus armis tutius fortiusque munitus?

### English translation (Claude)

Listen to me, then, or rather to the Lord our God through the ministry of my weakness. Remember what you were like while your first wife, of religious memory, was still in the body, and how, at her recent death, the vanity of this world filled you with horror and how you longed for the service of God. We know, we are witnesses, what you said to us at Tubunae about your mind and purpose; only my brother Alypius and I were there with you. I do not think the earthly cares that now fill you have been strong enough to wipe this entirely from your memory. You wanted, of course, to give up all the public affairs that occupied you, to withdraw into holy leisure and to live the life that the servants of God, the monks, live. And what called you back from doing it, except that you considered, when we showed you, how much what you were doing would benefit the churches of Christ, if you did it with this sole intention: that they, defended from the attacks of the barbarians, might lead a quiet and peaceful life, as the apostle says, in all godliness and chastity, while you sought nothing from this world except what was necessary to sustain your life and that of your household, girded with the belt of the most chaste continence and, amid bodily arms, more safely and strongly protected by spiritual arms?

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Tubunae (Tobna) in Numidia. Allusion: 1 Tim 2:2 (“in all godliness and chastity” is the Old Latin wording).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.3 (CSEL 57:432–433; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-3).

## Letter 220.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-4
- Source: CSEL 57:433–434
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reproaches Boniface for remarrying after vowing continence, for letting Arians baptize his daughter and rebaptize consecrated women, and for reported concubines.

### Latin text

Cum ergo te esse in hoc proposito gauderemus, nauigasti uxoremque duxisti. sed nauigasse oboedientiae fuit. quam secundum apostolum debebas sublimioribus potestatibus: uxorem autem non duxisses, nisi susceptam deserens continentiam concupiscentia uictus esses. quod ego cum comperissem. fateor. miratus obstipui; dolorem autem meum ex aliqua parte consolabatur, quod audiui te illam ducere noluisse, nisi prius catholica fuisset facta. et tamen haeresis eorum, qui uerum filium dei negant, tantum praeualuit in domo tua, ut ab ipsis filia tua baptizaretur. iam uero, si ad nos non falsa perlata sunt, quae utinam falsa sint, quod ab ipsis haereticis etiam ancillae deo dicatae rebaptizatae sint, quantis tantum malum plangendum est fontibus lacrimarum! ipsam quoque uxorem non tibi suffecisse, sed concubinarum nescio quarum commixtione pollutum loquuntur homines et forsitan mentiuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

While we were rejoicing that you held to this purpose, you sailed and married a wife. The sailing was obedience, which according to the apostle you owed to the higher powers; but you would not have married, had you not abandoned the continence you had taken up and been overcome by desire. When I learned this, I confess, I was struck dumb with amazement. Yet my grief was in some measure consoled when I heard that you had refused to marry her unless she first became a Catholic. And yet the heresy of those who deny the true Son of God has prevailed so far in your house that your daughter was baptized by them. And now, if what has been reported to us is not false (would that it were!), that even maidservants dedicated to God have been rebaptized by those same heretics, with what fountains of tears must so great an evil be lamented! People also say that your wife was not enough for you, but that you have been defiled by intercourse with some concubines or other; and perhaps they are lying.

### Scripture references

- Rom 13:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 13:1. “Those who deny the true Son of God” are the Arians; Boniface's second wife Pelagia had been an Arian. Rebaptism of consecrated virgins by Arians is reported as rumor.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.4 (CSEL 57:433–434; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-4).

## Letter 220.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-5
- Source: CSEL 57:434–435
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Boniface to repent without delay, saying that love of worldly goods brought him into his present plight.

### Latin text

Ista, quae omnibus patent, tot et tanta mala, quae a te, posteaquam coniugatus es, consecuta sunt, quid ego dicam? Christianus es, cor habes, deum times. tu ipse considera, quae nolo dicere, et inuenies, de quantis malis debeas agere paenitentiam, propter quam tibi credo dominum parcere et a periculis omnibus liberare, ut agas eam, sicut agenda est, sed si illud audias, quod scriptum est: Ne tardes conuerti ad dominum neque differas de die in diem. iustam quidem dicis habere te causam, cuius ego iudex non sum, quoniam partes ambas audire non possum; sed qualiscumque sit tua causa, de qua modo quaerere uel disputare non opus est, numquid coram deo potes negare, quod in istam necessitatem non peruenisses, nisi bona huius saeculi dilexisses. quae tamquam seruus dei, quem te ante noueramus, contemnere omnino et pro nihilo habere debuisti et oblata quidem sumere, ut eis utereris ad pietatem, non autem negata uel delegata sic quaerere, ut propter illa in istam necessitatem perducereris, ubi, cum amantur uana, perpetrantur mala pauca quidem a te sed multa propter te et, cum timentur, quae ad exiguum tempus nocent, si tamen nocent, committuntur ea. quae uere noceant in aeternum?

### English translation (Claude)

These evils, so many and so great, open to all, which have followed upon your marriage: what am I to say of them? You are a Christian, you have a heart, you fear God. Consider for yourself what I do not wish to say, and you will find how many evils you ought to do penance for. I believe it is for this that the Lord spares you and frees you from all dangers, so that you may do it as it should be done, if only you listen to what is written: “Do not delay to turn to the Lord, and do not put it off from day to day.” You say indeed that you have a just cause. I am not its judge, since I cannot hear both sides; but whatever your cause may be, which there is no need to inquire into or argue about now, can you deny before God that you would not have come into this necessity had you not loved the goods of this world? As the servant of God whom we knew you to be before, you ought to have despised them altogether and counted them as nothing: to take them when offered, so as to use them for godliness, but not to seek them when refused or entrusted to others in such a way that for their sake you were brought into this necessity, where, while vain things are loved, evil deeds are done, few indeed by you but many because of you; and where, while things are feared that do harm for a short time, if indeed they harm at all, things are done that truly do harm for eternity.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 5:7 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Sir 5:7 (Sirach 5:8 in some numberings). Boniface was then in conflict with the imperial court.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.5 (CSEL 57:434–435; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-5).

## Letter 220.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-6
- Source: CSEL 57:435–436
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Boniface's armed followers force him to feed their worldly desires by doing what God forbids, citing 1 John 2:15–17.

### Latin text

De quibus ut unum aliquid dicam, quis non uideat, quod multi homines tibi cohaereant ad tuendam tuam potentiam uel salutem, qui. etiam si tibi omnes fideles sint nec ab aliquo eorum ullae timeantur insidiae, nempe tamen ad ea bona, quae ipsi quoque non secundum deum sed secundum saeculum diligunt, per te cupiunt peruenire, ac per hoc, qui refrenare et compescere debuisti cupiditates tuas. explere cogeris alienas? quod ut fiat, necesse est multa, quae deo displicent, fiant. nec sic tamen explentur tales cupiditates; nam facilius resecantur in eis, qui deum diligunt, quam in eis, qui mundum diligunt, aliquando satiantur. propter quod dicit scriptura diuina: Nolite diligere mundum nec ea, quae in mundo sunt. si quis dilexerit mundum, dilectio patris non est in eo. quia omne quod in mundo est, concupiscentia carnis est et concupiscentia oculorum et ambitio saeculi, quae non est a patre, sed ex mundo est. et mundus transit et concupiscentia eius; qui autem facit uoluntatem dei, manet in aeternum. sicut et deus manet in aeternum. quando ergo poteris tot hominum armatorum, quorum fouenda est cupiditas, timetur atrocitas, quando, inquam, poteris eorum concupiscentiam. qui diligunt mundum, non dico satiare, quod fieri nullo modo potest. sed aliqua ex parte pascere, ne uniuersa plus pereant. nisi tu facias, quae deus prohibet et facientibus comminatur? propter quod uides tam multa contrita, ut iam uile aliquid, quod rapiatur, uix inueniatur.

### English translation (Claude)

To say just one thing about these: who does not see that many men attach themselves to you to protect your power or safety, and that, even if all of them are faithful to you and no plots are feared from any of them, they still want to reach through you the goods that they too love not according to God but according to the world? And so you, who ought to have bridled and restrained your own desires, are forced to satisfy other people's. For this to happen, many things displeasing to God must be done. Nor even so are such desires satisfied; for they are more easily cut off in those who love God than they are ever satisfied in those who love the world. That is why divine Scripture says: “Do not love the world or the things that are in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him; because all that is in the world is the desire of the flesh and the desire of the eyes and the ambition of the world, which is not from the Father but from the world. And the world passes away, and its desire; but whoever does the will of God abides forever, as God also abides forever.” When, then, will you be able, with so many armed men whose desire must be fostered and whose ferocity is feared, when, I say, will you be able, I do not say to satisfy the desire of those who love the world, which can in no way be done, but to feed it in some measure, so that all may not perish the more, unless you do what God forbids and threatens those who do it? Because of this you see so much laid waste that hardly anything of value can now be found to plunder.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 2:15–17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 John 2:15–17, with the Old Latin addition “as God also abides forever.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.6 (CSEL 57:435–436; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-6).

## Letter 220.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-7
- Source: CSEL 57:436
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine laments that Africa is being ravaged by barbarians unresisted, although Boniface, now count, had once subdued them as a tribune.

### Latin text

Quid autem dicam de uastatione Africae, quam faciunt Afri barbari resistente nullo, dum tu talis tuis necessitatibus occuparis nec aliquid ordinas, unde ista calamitas auertatur? quis autem crederet. quis autem timeret Bonifatio domesticorum et Africae comite in Africa constituto cum tam magno exercitu et potestate. qui tribunus cum paucis foederatis omnes ipsas gentes expugnando et terrendo pacauerat, nunc tantum fuisse barbaros ausuros, tantum progressuros, tanta uastaturos. tanta rapturos, tanta loca, quae plena populis fuerant. deserta facturos? qui non dicebant, quandocumque tu comitiuam sumeres potestatem, Afros barbaros non solum domitos sed etiam tributarios futuros Romanae rei publicae? et nunc quam in contrarium uersa sit spes hominum, uides. nec diutius hinc tecum loquendum est, quia plus ea tu potes cogitare quam nos dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

And what shall I say of the devastation of Africa, which African barbarians are carrying out with no one resisting, while you, in your present state, are occupied with your own necessities and order nothing by which this calamity might be averted? Who would have believed, who would have feared, that with Boniface as count of the household troops and of Africa, stationed in Africa with so great an army and so much power, the man who as tribune with a few federate troops had pacified all those very peoples by fighting and frightening them, the barbarians would now have dared so much, advanced so far, laid waste so much, plundered so much, and turned so many places that were full of people into a desert? Who did not say that whenever you took up the power of count, the African barbarians would be not only subdued but even made tributaries of the Roman state? And now you see how far men's hope has been turned to its opposite. There is no need to speak with you longer about this, since you can think of more than we can say.

### Translation notes

- “African barbarians”: the Moorish tribes, not yet the Vandals, who crossed in 429.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.7 (CSEL 57:436; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-7).

## Letter 220.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-8
- Source: CSEL 57:436–438
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Boniface, whatever wrongs he has suffered from the court, not to repay evil for good or evil for evil, but to love his enemies as Christ commands.

### Latin text

Sed forte ad ista respondes illis hoc esse potius inputandum, qui te laeserunt, qui tuis officiosis uirtutibus non paria sed contraria reddiderunt. quas causas ego audire et inspice non possum; tuam causam potius aspice et inspice, quam non cum hominibus quibuslibet sed cum deo habere te cognoscis; quia in Christo fideliter uiuis, ipsum debes timere ne offendas. nam causas ego superiores potius adtendo, quia. ut Africa tanta mala patiatur, suis debent inputare homines peccatis. uerum tamen nolo te ad eorum numerum pertinere, per quos malos et iniquos deus flagellat poenis temporalibus, quos uoluerit. ipsis namque iniquis, si correcti non fuerint, seruat aeterna supplicia, quorum malitia iuste utitur, ut aliis mala ingerat temporalia. tu deum adtende, tu Christum considera, qui tanta bona praestitit et tanta mala pertulit. quicumque ad eius regnum cupiunt pertinere et cum illo ac sub illo semper beate uiuere, diligunt etiam inimicos suos, bene faciunt illis, qui eos oderunt, et orant pro eis, a quibus persecutionem patiuntur, et, si quando adhibent pro disciplina molestam seueritatem, non tamen amittunt sincerissimam caritatem. si ergo bona tibi sunt praestita quamuis terrena transitoria ab imperio Romano. quia et ipsum terrenum est non caeleste nec potest praestare, nisi quod habet in potestate, si ergo bona in te conlata sunt, noli reddere mala pro bonis: si autem mala tibi inrogata sunt, noli reddere mala pro malis. quid istorum duorum sit, nec discutere uolo nec ualeo iudicare; ego Christiano loquor: noli reddere uel mala pro bonis uel mala pro malis.

### English translation (Claude)

But perhaps you will answer that this should rather be laid to the charge of those who wronged you and repaid your dutiful virtues not with equal but with contrary treatment. These causes I cannot hear and examine; rather, look at and examine your own cause, which you know you have not with any men at all but with God. Since you live faithfully in Christ, you ought to fear offending him. For my part I look rather to higher causes: that Africa suffers such evils, men must lay to the charge of their own sins. Yet I do not want you to belong to the number of those, wicked and unjust, through whom God scourges with temporal punishments whom he wills. For to these unjust men themselves, if they are not corrected, he reserves eternal punishments, while justly using their malice to bring temporal evils on others. Look to God; consider Christ, who bestowed such great goods and endured such great evils. All who long to belong to his kingdom, and to live with him and under him always in happiness, love even their enemies, do good to those who hate them, and pray for those from whom they suffer persecution; and if ever they use painful severity for the sake of discipline, they do not lose the most sincere love. If, then, goods have been bestowed on you by the Roman Empire, though earthly and passing, because it too is earthly, not heavenly, and can bestow only what it has in its power, if, I say, goods have been conferred on you, do not repay evil for good; but if evils have been inflicted on you, do not repay evil for evil. Which of the two it is, I neither wish to discuss nor am able to judge; I speak to a Christian: do not repay either evil for good or evil for evil.

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:44: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 12:17: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Examine”: the digital text reads inspice, probably a slip for a verb such as inspicere; translated by sense. Allusions: Matt 5:44 (Luke 6:27–28); Rom 12:17; 1 Thess 5:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.8 (CSEL 57:436–438; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-8).

## Letter 220.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-9
- Source: CSEL 57:438–439
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he can give no worldly advice for Boniface's safety, but counsels him according to God to stop loving the world and to repent.

### Latin text

Dicis mihi fortasse: In tanta necessitate quid uis ut faciam? si consilium a me secundum hoc saeculum quaeris, quo modo ista salus tua transitoria tuta sit et potentia atque opulentia uel ista seruetur, quam nunc habes, uel etiam maior addatur, quid tibi respondeam, nescio: incerta quippe ista certum consilium habere non possunt. si autem secundum deum me consulis, ne anima tua pereat, et times uerba ueritatis dicentis: Quid prodest homini, si totum mundum lucretur, animae autem suae damnum patiatur, habeo plane, quod dicam; est apud me consilium, quod a me audias. quid autem opus est, ut aliud dicam quam illud, quod supra dixi: Noli diligere mundum nec ea. quae in mundo sunt. si quis enim dilexerit mundum, non est caritas patris in illo. quoniam omnia, quae in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis est et concupiscentia oculorum et ambitio saeculi, quae non est a patre, sed ex mundo est. et mundus transit et concupiscentia eius; qui autem fecerit uoluntatem dei, manet in aeternum, sicut et deus manet in aeternum: ecce consilium; arripe et age. hic appareat, si uir fortis es; uince cupiditates, quibus iste diligitur mundus, age paenitentiam de praeteritis malis, quando ab eis cupiditatibus uictus per desideria uana trahebaris. hoc consilium si acceperis, si tenueris atque seruaueris, et ad bona illa certa peruenies et cum salute animae tuae inter ista incerta uersaberis.

### English translation (Claude)

Perhaps you will say to me: “In such great necessity, what do you want me to do?” If you are asking my advice according to this world, how this passing safety of yours may be secure and your power and wealth either preserved as you now have them or even increased, I do not know what to answer you; for uncertain things cannot have certain counsel. But if you consult me according to God, so that your soul may not perish, and you fear the words of the Truth, who says, “What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his own soul?”, then I certainly have something to say; I have counsel for you to hear from me. And what need is there for me to say anything other than what I said above: “Do not love the world or the things that are in the world. For if anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him; because all things that are in the world are the desire of the flesh and the desire of the eyes and the ambition of the world, which is not from the Father but from the world. And the world passes away, and its desire; but whoever does the will of God abides forever, as God also abides forever.” There is the counsel: seize it and act. Here let it be seen whether you are a brave man. Conquer the desires by which this world is loved; do penance for the past evils, when, conquered by those desires, you were dragged along by vain longings. If you accept this counsel, if you hold to it and keep it, you will both reach those certain goods and move among these uncertain things with the salvation of your soul.

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:26: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 2:15–17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 16:26; 1 John 2:15–17 again.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.9 (CSEL 57:438–439; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-9).

## Letter 220.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-10
- Source: CSEL 57:439
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Boniface to pray to be delivered from his necessities by conquering his desires and to use worldly goods as not using them.

### Latin text

Sed forte iterum quaeris a me, quo modo ista facias tantis mundi huius necessitatibus implicatus. ora fortiter et dic deo, quod habes in psalmo: De necessitatibus meis erue me. tunc enim finiuntur istae necessitates, quando uincuntur illae cupiditates. qui exaudiuit te et nos pro te, ut libereris de tot tantisque periculis uisibilium corporaliumque bellorum, ubi sola ista uita quandoque finienda periclitatur, anima uero non perit, si non malignis cupiditatibus captiua teneatur, ipse te exaudiet, ut interiores et inuisibiles hostes, id est ipsas cupiditates inuisibiliter et spiritaliter uincas et sic utaris hoc mundo tamquam non utens, ut ex bonis eius bona facias, non malus fias, quia et ipsa bona sunt nec dantur hominibus nisi ab illo, qui habet omnium caelestium et terrestrium potestatem. sed ne putentur mala, dantur et bonis; ne putentur magna uel summa bona, dantur et malis itemque auferuntur ista et bonis, ut probentur, et malis, ut crucientur.

### English translation (Claude)

But perhaps you will ask me again how you can do this when entangled in such great necessities of this world. Pray earnestly and say to God what you have in the psalm: “From my necessities deliver me.” For these necessities end when those desires are conquered. He who heard you, and us on your behalf, so that you were freed from so many and so great dangers of visible and bodily wars, where only this life, which must end some day, is in danger, while the soul does not perish unless it is held captive by evil desires, he will hear you so that you may conquer, invisibly and spiritually, the inner and invisible enemies, that is, those desires themselves; and so use this world as though not using it, to do good things with its goods, not to become evil. For they too are goods, and they are given to men only by him who has power over all things in heaven and on earth. But lest they be thought evil, they are given also to the good; lest they be thought great or supreme goods, they are given also to the wicked; and likewise they are taken away both from the good, to test them, and from the wicked, to torment them.

### Scripture references

- Ps 25:17 (24:17 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:31: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Ps 25:17 (LXX 24:17). Allusion: 1 Cor 7:31.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.10 (CSEL 57:439; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-10).

## Letter 220.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-11
- Source: CSEL 57:439–440
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts earthly goods given to good and bad alike with eternal goods given only to the good, and urges alms, prayer and fasting.

### Latin text

Quis enim nesciat, quis ita sit stultus, ut non uideat. quod salus huius mortalis corporis et membrorum corruptibilium uirtus et uictoria de hominibus inimicis et honor atque potentia temporalis et cetera ista bona terrena et bonis dentur et malis et bonis auferantur et malis? salus uero animae cum inmortalitate corporis uirtusque iustitiae et uictoria de cupiditatibus inimicis et gloria et honor et pax in aeternum non dantur nisi bonis. ista ergo dilige, ista concupisce, ista modis omnibus quaere. propter haec adquirenda et obtinenda fac elemosynas, funde orationes, exerce ieiunia. quantum sine laesione tui corporis potes. bona uero illa terrena noli diligere, quanta libet tibi abundent. sic eis utere, ut bona multa ex illis nullum autem malum facias propter illa. omnia quippe talia peribunt, sed bona opera non pereunt, etiam quae de bonis pereuntibus fiunt.

### English translation (Claude)

For who does not know, who is so foolish as not to see, that the health of this mortal body, the strength of corruptible limbs, victory over human enemies, temporal honor and power, and the other earthly goods of this kind are given both to the good and to the wicked, and are taken away both from the good and from the wicked? But the salvation of the soul with the immortality of the body, the virtue of righteousness, victory over hostile desires, and glory and honor and peace forever are given only to the good. Love these things, then; desire these; seek these in every way. To acquire and keep them, give alms, pour out prayers, practice fasting as far as you can without harm to your body. But do not love those earthly goods, however abundant they may be for you. Use them so as to do much good with them and no evil for their sake. For all such things will perish, but good works do not perish, even those done with perishing goods.

### Scripture references

- Rom 2:10: echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Echo: Rom 2:10 (“glory and honor and peace”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.11 (CSEL 57:439–440; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-11).

## Letter 220.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-12
- Source: CSEL 57:440–442
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that since Boniface's wife has not consented to continence he must at least keep conjugal chastity, love God rather than the world, and seek peace.

### Latin text

Si enim coniugem non haberes, dicerem tibi, quod et Tubunis diximus, ut in castitate continentiae uiueres; adderem. quod tunc fieri prohibuimus, ut iam te, quantum rerum humanarum salua pace potuisses, ab istis bellicis rebus abstraheres et ei uitae uacares in societate sanctorum, cui tunc uacare cupiebas ubi in silentio pugnant milites Christi, non ut occidant homines, sed ut expugnent principes et potestates et spiritalia nequitiae, id est diabolum et angelos eius. hos enim hostes sancti uincunt, quos uidere non possunt; et tamen, quos non uident, uincunt ista uincendo, quae sentiunt. sed ut te ad istam uitam non exhorter, coniunx impedimento est, sine cuius consensione continenter tibi non liceat uiuere. quia, etsi tu eam post illa tua uerba Tubunensia ducere non debebas, illa tibi tamen nihil eorum sciens innocenter et simpliciter nupsit. atque utinam posses ei persuadere continentiam, ut sine impedimento redderes deo, quod te debere cognoscis! sed si cum illa agere non potes, serua saltem pudicitiam coniugalem et roga deum, qui te de necessitatibus eruat, ut, quod non potes modo, possis aliquando. uerum tamen, ut deum diligas, non diligas mundum; ut in ipsis bellis, si adhuc in eis te uersari opus est, fidem teneas, pacem quaeras; ut ex mundi bonis facias opera bona et propter mundi bona non facias opera mala, aut non impedit coniunx aut impedire non debet. haec ad te, fili dilectissime, ut scriberem, caritas iussit, qua te secundum deum, non secundum hoc saeculum diligo, quia et cogitans, quod scriptum est: Corripe sapientem et amabit te, corripe stultum et adiciet odisse te, non te utique stultum sed sapientem debui cogitare.

### English translation (Claude)

If you did not have a wife, I would tell you what we told you at Tubunae as well: to live in the chastity of continence. I would add what we then forbade: that you should now, as far as you could with the peace of human affairs kept safe, withdraw from these military matters and devote yourself, in the company of the saints, to the life you then longed to devote yourself to, where the soldiers of Christ fight in silence, not to kill men, but to overcome the principalities and powers and spiritual forces of wickedness, that is, the devil and his angels. For the saints conquer these enemies, whom they cannot see; and yet they conquer those they do not see by conquering the things they feel. But your wife is the obstacle that keeps me from urging you to that life, since without her consent you may not live in continence. For although you ought not to have married her after those words of yours at Tubunae, she, knowing nothing of them, married you innocently and simply. And would that you could persuade her to continence, so that you might render to God without hindrance what you know you owe! But if you cannot settle this with her, at least keep conjugal chastity, and ask God, who delivers you from your necessities, that what you cannot do now you may be able to do some day. Yet a wife does not hinder, or ought not to hinder, your loving God and not loving the world; your keeping faith in the very wars, if you must still be engaged in them, and seeking peace; your doing good works with the goods of the world and not doing evil works for the sake of the goods of the world. Love, by which I love you according to God and not according to this world, commanded me to write this to you, my dearly beloved son. And thinking of what is written, “Rebuke a wise man and he will love you; rebuke a fool and he will hate you the more,” I was surely bound to think of you not as a fool but as a wise man.

### Scripture references

- Eph 6:12: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:5: allusion, medium confidence
- Prov 9:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Eph 6:12; 1 Cor 7:5 (continence only by mutual consent). Quotation: Prov 9:8 in the Old Latin form.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 220.12 (CSEL 57:440–442; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-220-12).

## Letter 221.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-1
- Source: CSEL 57:442–443
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The deacon Quodvultdeus of Carthage opens his request to Augustine, emboldened by Augustine's known kindness.

### Latin text

Diu trepidus fui et ausus hos meos aliquotiens distuli. sed me principaliter, ut dici adsolet, animauit beatitudinis tuae beniuolentia omnibus comprobata, quam dum considero, magis timui, ne non petendo superbus, non quaerendo desidiosus. non pulsando piger a domino iudicarer. sufficere autem mihi crederem huius modi tantum modo uoluntatem. si fructum adipisci non possem; cum autem pro certo nouerim ostium diuini sermonis, quod uenerationi tuae caelestis gratia patefecit. paratam esse mentem tuam sanctam. quam possidet Christus, non solum cunctis uolentibus pandere, uerum etiam nolentibus, ut introire non pigeat, persuadere, occupationi reuerentiae tuae multiloquio superfluo moram non faciam. sed desiderium obsecrationis meae breuiter indicabo.

### English translation (Claude)

For a long time I was fearful and several times put off this venture of mine. But what chiefly gave me courage, as the saying goes, was Your Blessedness's kindness, proven to all; and as I considered it, I feared the more that I might be judged by the Lord proud for not asking, idle for not seeking, lazy for not knocking. I would have thought the mere wish of this kind enough for me, if I could not obtain its fruit. But since I know for certain that your holy mind, which Christ possesses, is ready not only to open the door of the divine word, which heavenly grace has opened to Your Reverence, to all who wish it, but even to persuade the unwilling not to be reluctant to enter, I will not delay Your Reverence's busy life with superfluous talk, but will briefly state the desire of my petition.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Quodvultdeus, deacon of Carthage, to Augustine (ca. 428). Allusion: Matt 7:7 (ask, seek, knock).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 221.1 (CSEL 57:442–443; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-1).

## Letter 221.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-2
- Source: CSEL 57:443–444
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus asks Augustine for a handbook of all heresies since Christ, with their errors, their baptism, and the Church's answers.

### Latin text

Nonnullos in clero huiusce etiam amplissimae ciuitatis esse inperitos ex me ipso conicio et. quantum uniuerso illi ordini profuturum sit. quod expeto. considerationi sanctitatis tuae discutiendum offero. priuilegium namque cunctorum, qui hoc de spiritalibus tuis laboribus promerentur, etiam me indignum consecuturum esse praesumo. domine merito uenerabilis et uere beatissime pater. precor igitur pietatem tuam. ut. ex quo Christiana religio hereditatis promissae nomen accepit, quae haereses fuerint, sint, quos errores intulerint, inferant, quid aduersus catholicam ecclesiam senserint, sentiant de fide, de trinitate. de baptismo, de paenitentia, de homine Christo, de deo Christo, de resurrectione, de nouo et ueteri testamento et omnia omnino, quibus a ueritate dissentiunt, quae etiam baptismum habeant quaeue non habeant et post quam baptizet nec tamen rebaptizet ecclesia. qualiter suscipiat uenientes et quid singulis lege, auctoritate atque ratione respondeat, digneris exponere.

### English translation (Claude)

From my own case I infer that some of the clergy even of this very great city are unlearned; and how useful what I ask will be to that whole order I offer for Your Holiness to consider. For I presume that I too, unworthy as I am, will gain the privilege of all who earn this from your spiritual labors, my lord justly venerable and truly most blessed father. I beg your goodness, therefore, to deign to set out what heresies there have been and are since the Christian religion received the name of the promised inheritance; what errors they have introduced and introduce; what they have held and hold against the Catholic Church concerning the faith, the Trinity, baptism, penance, Christ as man, Christ as God, the resurrection, the New and Old Testaments, and absolutely everything in which they dissent from the truth; which of them even have baptism and which do not, and after whose baptism the Church does not rebaptize; how she receives those who come over; and what she answers to each by law, authority and reason.

### Translation notes

- This request led to Augustine's De haeresibus (428).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 221.2 (CSEL 57:443–444; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-2).

## Letter 221.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-3
- Source: CSEL 57:444–445
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus asks not for full refutations but for a brief summary of each heresy and the Catholic answer, useful to learned and unlearned clergy alike.

### Latin text

Nec me tantae tua beatitudo credat ineptiae, ut non inspiciam, quantis et quam ingentibus uoluminibus opus sit, ut possint ista dissolui. uerum hoc ego fieri non expeto; id enim multipliciter factum esse non dubito; sed breuiter, perstricte atque summatim et opiniones rogo cuiuslibet haeresis poni et, quid contra teneat ecclesia catholica, quantum instructioni satis est, subdi, ut uelut quodam ex omnibus concepto commonitorio, si quis aliquam obiectionem aut conuictionem uberius, plenius ac planius nosse uoluerit, ad opulenta et magnifica uolumina transmittatur, quibus a diuersis et praecipue a ueneratione tua in hoc ipso constat elaboratum. sufficiet autem admonitio talis, ut puto, doctis et inperitis, otiosis et occupatis et ad cuiuslibet gradus ministerium ecclesiae undecumque promotis, dum et ille, qui multa legit, eadem breuiter recordatur et compendio ignarus instruitur, ut nouerit, quid teneat, quid euitet, quid auersetur. ne faciat. quid. ut faciat, adsequatur. fortassis autem, si tamen, quod arbitror. uerum est. etiam aduersus calumniantium malignas mentes et dolosa labia opus hoc paruum inter cetera magnifica testimonio coronae tuae non deerit, ut, quibus patet campus calumniandi profusior, ualidis et ex omni parte conclusis fidei limitibus coartati omnibusque ueritatis telorum generibus circumacti etiam uno multiformi iaculo repente prostrati morticinos spiritus non audeant anhelare.

### English translation (Claude)

Let Your Blessedness not think me so foolish as not to see how many huge volumes would be needed to refute all this. But that is not what I ask, for I do not doubt it has been done in many ways. Rather, I ask that the opinions of each heresy be set out briefly, concisely and in summary, and that what the Catholic Church holds against them be added, as much as suffices for instruction, so that, as from a kind of memorandum drawn from them all, anyone who wishes to know some objection or refutation more fully, completely and clearly may be sent on to the rich and magnificent volumes which, as is well known, various writers, and above all Your Reverence, have produced on this very matter. Such a reminder will suffice, I think, for the learned and the unlearned, the leisured and the busy, and for those promoted from anywhere to the ministry of the Church in any grade: the one who has read much will recall the same things briefly, and the ignorant will be instructed in summary, so that he may know what to hold, what to avoid, what to turn from; that he may not do what he should not, and may attain what he should do. And perhaps, if what I think is true, this small work, among your other magnificent ones, will not fail to bear witness to your crown even against the malicious minds and deceitful lips of slanderers, so that those who have a wider field for slander, hemmed in by strong boundaries of faith closed on every side, surrounded by every kind of weapon of truth, and struck down suddenly even by one many-formed javelin, may not dare to breathe out their deadly spirits.

### Translation notes

- “Deadly” renders morticinos (literally “carrion”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 221.3 (CSEL 57:444–445; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-3).

## Letter 221.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-4
- Source: CSEL 57:445–446
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus apologizes for burdening the aged Augustine and begs him by Christ to write for the untaught.

### Latin text

Video, quam onerosus existam meliora cogitanti et disponenti maiora sancto seni et querelas corporis sustinenti. sed per Christum dominum rogo, qui te participem sapientiae suae sine inuidia esse concessit, ut hanc gratiam dones indoctis ecclesiae, qui te agnoscis sapientibus atque insipientibus debitorem merito ac iure dicturus: Videte, quoniam non mihi soli laboraui sed omnibus exquirentibus ueritatem. potui adhuc offerre supplices ac multiplices preces et mecum inperitorum classes adsciscere, sed malui iam gaudere dictantem quam adhuc occupare legentem.

### English translation (Claude)

I see how burdensome I am to a holy old man who is thinking of better things, planning greater ones, and bearing the complaints of the body. But I beg you by Christ the Lord, who granted you to share his wisdom without envy, to give this gift to the untaught of the Church, since you acknowledge yourself a debtor to the wise and the foolish, and can rightly and justly say: “See that I have not labored for myself alone but for all who seek the truth.” I could still offer many humble prayers and gather the ranks of the unlearned with me, but I preferred to rejoice already in you dictating rather than to occupy you any longer in reading.

### Scripture references

- Rom 1:14: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:13 (Wisdom of Solomon): allusion, medium confidence
- Sir 24:34 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Wis 7:13 (“without envy”); Rom 1:14. Quotation: Sir 24:34 (Vulgate 24:47; cf. 33:18).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 221.4 (CSEL 57:445–446; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-221-4).

## Letter 222.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-1
- Source: CSEL 57:446
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Quodvultdeus that he has already written of the difficulty of a work on all heresies and now explains it.

### Latin text

Acceptis litteris caritatis tuae, ubi a me ardentissimo studio postulasti, ut de omnibus haeresibus, quae post domini saluatoris aduentum aduersus eius doctrinam pullulauerunt, aliquid breuiter scriberem, quam sit hoc difficile, continuo reperta occasione rescripsi per filium meum Hipponiensium primarium Philocalum. mox autem etiam ista oblata est, qua nunc rescribo et breuiter difficultatem operis eius ostendo.

### English translation (Claude)

When I received the letter of Your Charity, in which you asked me with most ardent zeal to write something brief on all the heresies that have sprung up against the teaching of the Lord and Savior since his coming, I wrote back at once at the first opportunity, through my son Philocalus, a leading citizen of Hippo, how difficult this is. Soon another opportunity has offered, by which I now write back and briefly show the difficulty of the task.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Quodvultdeus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 222.1 (CSEL 57:446; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-1).

## Letter 222.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-2
- Source: CSEL 57:446–448
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that Philastrius counted 156 heresies and Epiphanius 80, showing how hard it is to define heresy, and offers to send Epiphanius's book for translation at Carthage.

### Latin text

Philastrius quidam, Brixensis episcopus, quem cum sancto Ambrosio Mediolani etiam ipse uidi, scripsit hinc librum nec illas haereses praetermittens, quae in populo Iudaeo fuerunt ante domini aduentum, easque XX et VIII commemorauit et post domini aduentum CXX et VIII. scripsit hinc etiam Graece episcopus Cyprius Epiphanius in doctrina catholicae fidei laudabiliter diffamatus. sed et ipse utriusque temporis haereses colligens LXXX complexus est. cum ergo ambo id uellent facere, quod a me petis, quantum tamen inter se differant, de numero interim sectarum uides. quod utique non euenisset, nisi aliud uni eorum uideretur esse haeresis et aliud alteri. neque enim putandum est aliquas ignorasse Epiphanium. quas nouerat Philastrius, cum Epiphanius longe Philastrio doctior eminuerit. ita ut Philastrium potius dicere debeamus latuisse plurimas. si tam plures esset ille complexus et iste pauciores. sed procul dubio in ea quaestione, ubi disceptatur, quid sit haeresis, non idem uidebatur ambobus. et re uera hoc omnino definire difficile est et ideo cauendum, cum omnes in numerum redigere conamur, ne praetermittamus aliquas, quamuis haereses sint, aut adnumeremus aliquas, cum haereses non sint. uide ergo, ne forte librum sancti Epiphanii tibi mittere debeam; ipsum enim arbitror Philastrio doctius hinc locutum. qui possit apud Carthaginem in Latinam linguam uerti facilius atque commodius, ut tu potius praestes nobis, quod quaeris a nobis.

### English translation (Claude)

A certain Philastrius, bishop of Brescia, whom I myself saw with Saint Ambrose at Milan, wrote a book on this, not omitting the heresies that existed among the Jewish people before the Lord's coming; he listed twenty-eight of these, and after the Lord's coming one hundred and twenty-eight. Epiphanius, a bishop of Cyprus, widely and deservedly praised for his teaching of the Catholic faith, also wrote on this in Greek. He too collected the heresies of both periods, and included eighty. Since both wished to do what you ask of me, you see how far they differ from each other in the mere number of sects. This would surely not have happened unless one of them thought one thing a heresy and the other another. For we must not suppose that Epiphanius was ignorant of any that Philastrius knew, since Epiphanius stood out as far more learned than Philastrius; so that we should rather have to say that very many escaped Philastrius if he had included so many more and Epiphanius fewer. But without doubt, on the question of what a heresy is, the two did not think alike. And in truth it is altogether hard to define, and so, when we try to bring them all into a count, we must take care not to omit some although they are heresies, or to count some although they are not. Consider, then, whether I should perhaps send you Saint Epiphanius's book, for I think he spoke on this more learnedly than Philastrius. It could be translated into Latin more easily and conveniently at Carthage, so that you might rather provide us with what you ask of us.

### Translation notes

- Philastrius, Diversarum hereseon liber; Epiphanius, Anacephalaeosis (the summary of the Panarion), with its 80 heresies.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 222.2 (CSEL 57:446–448; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-2).

## Letter 222.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-3
- Source: CSEL 57:448–449
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine commends the bearer, a subdeacon, and asks about Theodosius, who exposed some Manichees, and about the bishops' departure.

### Latin text

Perlatorem multum commendo. subdiaconus est de nostra dioecesi, de fundo autem uiri spectabilis nobisque carissimi Oronti. pro illo autem et pro eius patre. a quo adoptatus est, etiam ad ipsum scripsi. quas litteras cum legerit Christiana benignitas tua. peto, ut eas apud memoratum uirum tua intercessione adiuuare digneris. misi autem cum illo etiam hominem ecclesiae, ne ad tuam sanctitatem difficilis ei esset accessus; non enim parum de illo sollicitus sum, a qua me sollicitudine dominus, ut spero, per tuae caritatis instantiam liberabit. peto etiam mihi rescribere non graueris. quem ad modum sit in fide catholica ille Theodosius. per quem Manichaei nonnulli sunt proditi, et ipsi, quos ab eo proditos putamus esse correctos. si quid etiam de profectione sanctorum episcoporum fortassis audisti, fac, ut nouerim. deo uiuas.

### English translation (Claude)

I warmly commend the bearer. He is a subdeacon of our diocese, from the estate of the distinguished Orontius, a man very dear to us. I have also written to Orontius himself on his behalf and on behalf of his father, by whom he was adopted. When your Christian kindness has read that letter, I ask you to deign to support it with your intercession before the man I mentioned. I have also sent a man of the church with him, so that he may not find access to Your Holiness difficult; for I am not a little anxious about him, an anxiety from which the Lord, I hope, will free me through Your Charity's earnestness. I ask you also not to mind writing back to me how that Theodosius stands in the Catholic faith, through whom some Manichees were exposed, and how those stand whom we think were corrected after he exposed them. And if you have perhaps heard anything about the departure of the holy bishops, let me know. May you live to God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 222.3 (CSEL 57:448–449; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-222-3).

## Letter 223.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-1
- Source: CSEL 57:449–450
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus acknowledges Augustine's reply on the difficulty of the task but trusts in God's grace and Augustine's gifts.

### Latin text

Unum quidem reuerentiae tuae commonitorium, quod per ecclesiasticum dignatus es destinare, suscepi; nam quod prius directum esse beatitudo tua significauit per uirum honorabilem Philocalum, necdum ad me peruenit. uerum quamuis conscius propriorum semper fuerim peccatorum, nunc tamen euidenter agnoui adipiscendo illi, quod exoraui. muneri meam toti ecclesiae impedimento esse personam. sed omnino confido, quoniam, qui per unici sui gratiam humani generis dignatus est delere facinora, nec mea in perniciem cunctorum praeualere permittet potiusque, ubi abundauit peccatum, gratiam faciet redundare, domine merito uenerabilis ac uere beatissime sancte pater. difficultatem operis, quod instruendis inperitissimis nobis praestari per tuam beneficientiam suppliciter exoraui, nec ipse ignorans ante praedixi; sed de diuini fontis ubertate, quam tibi dominus tribuit, ueraci corde praesumpsi.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received the one memorandum that Your Reverence deigned to send by the church's messenger; the one Your Blessedness said had been sent earlier by the honorable Philocalus has not yet reached me. Though I have always been conscious of my own sins, I now plainly recognize that my person is an obstacle to the whole Church in obtaining the gift I begged for. But I trust completely that he who deigned to blot out the crimes of the human race through the grace of his only Son will not let my sins prevail to the ruin of all, but rather, where sin abounded, will make grace abound the more, my lord justly venerable and truly most blessed holy father. I knew, and said beforehand, how difficult is the work that I humbly begged your kindness to provide for the instruction of us most unlearned people; but I trusted with a sincere heart in the abundance of the divine fountain that the Lord has given you.

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:20: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quodvultdeus to Augustine. Allusion: Rom 5:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 223.1 (CSEL 57:449–450; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-1).

## Letter 223.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-2
- Source: CSEL 57:450–451
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus objects that Philastrius and Epiphanius give no answers to each heresy, are not brief, are in Greek, and omit later heresies.

### Latin text

Nam etsi Philastrius et Epiphanius, uenerandi episcopi, tale aliquid scripsisse monstrantur, quod procul dubio me inter cetera, immo sicut omnia latet, non tamen arbitror eos hanc curam diligentiamque seruasse, ut singulis quibusque opinionibus contrarias etiam responsiones adiungerent ritusque subicerent; tunc deinde opus illud utriusque, qualecumque sit. non habet fortassis eam, quam desidero, breuitatem. frustra etiam homini, qui Latine non didici, Graeca facundia delegatur, quia non ego tantum modo consilium sed et auxilium postulaui. quid autem uenerationem tuam de interpretum non solum difficultate sed etiam obscuritate commoneam, cum ipse hoc magis ac plene diiudices? accedit ad causam, quod nonnullae etiam ab illorum obitu haereses emersisse doceantur, quarum nullam illi fecerint mentionem.

### English translation (Claude)

For although Philastrius and Epiphanius, venerable bishops, are shown to have written something of this kind, which, among other things, or rather like everything, is no doubt unknown to me, I do not think they took the care and diligence to add to each opinion the answers against it and to set out the Church's rites; and then the work of each, whatever it is, perhaps does not have the brevity I desire. It is also useless to refer Greek eloquence to a man who has not even learned Latin well, since I asked not only for advice but also for help. And why should I remind Your Reverence of the difficulty, and even the obscurity, of translators, when you yourself judge this better and fully? Add to this that some heresies are known to have arisen even since their deaths, of which they made no mention.

### Translation notes

- “Who has not even learned Latin well”: the Latin reads qui Latine non didici (“who have not learned Latin”), evidently modest exaggeration or a slip for Graece; translated by the likely sense, uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 223.2 (CSEL 57:450–451; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-2).

## Letter 223.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-3
- Source: CSEL 57:451
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Quodvultdeus begs Augustine to write the work himself rather than refer him to Greek authors, promising to keep knocking.

### Latin text

Quas ob res ad peculiare patrocinium pietatis tuae confugio et uoce mea sed uniuersali desiderio paratum ad misericordiam sacrosanctum pietatis pectus appello. sequestratis saporibus peregrinis considerato textu prioris epistulae panem Afrum, quem nostra prouincia solet habere praecipuum caelesti etiam manna conditum, sero pulsanti sed famem patienti non deneges: profecto enim nec ego pulsare cessabo, donec ipse concedas, ut, quod non impetrat priuilegium, quod nullum est, meritorum, saltem indefessa importunitas mereatur.

### English translation (Claude)

For these reasons I take refuge in the special protection of your goodness, and with my voice, but with the desire of all, I appeal to that holy heart of goodness ever ready for mercy. Set aside foreign flavors, consider the text of my former letter, and do not refuse African bread, which our province usually has as its finest, seasoned too with heavenly manna, to one who knocks late but suffers hunger. For I certainly will not stop knocking until you grant that what the privilege of merit, which is none, does not obtain, at least untiring importunity may earn.

### Scripture references

- Luke 11:5–8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Luke 11:5–8 (the friend who knocks at midnight).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 223.3 (CSEL 57:451; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-223-3).

## Letter 224.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-1
- Source: CSEL 57:451–452
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Quodvultdeus that he has reread his request but has been prevented from beginning the work on heresies.

### Latin text

Cum mihi haec scribendi offerretur occasio per Fussalensem presbyterum, quem commendo caritati tuae, recensui epistulam tuam, in qua petis, ut de haeresibus. quae oriri potuerunt, ex quo domini in carne adnuntiari coepit aduentus, aliquid scriberem. hoc autem feci, ut uiderem. utrum iam deberem opus ipsum adgredi et inde tibi aliquid mittere. ubi considerares tanto esse difficilius, quanto uis effici breuius. sed ne hoc quidem potui talibus curis superuenientibus impeditus, a quibus omnino dissimulare non possem; nam me et ab eo, quod habebam in manibus. auerterunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Since this opportunity of writing offered itself through the presbyter of Fussala, whom I commend to Your Charity, I reread your letter in which you ask me to write something about the heresies that have been able to arise since the Lord's coming in the flesh began to be proclaimed. I did this to see whether I ought now to undertake the work itself and send you something of it, in which you would see that it is the harder the shorter you want it done. But I could not do even this, hindered by cares that came upon me which I could not ignore at all; for they turned me aside even from what I had in hand.

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Quodvultdeus (428).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 224.1 (CSEL 57:451–452; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-1).

## Letter 224.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-2
- Source: CSEL 57:452–453
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that he is answering Julian's eight books and has finished two books of Retractations covering 232 works, and plans to begin the work on heresies alongside.

### Latin text

Hoc autem est, ubi respondeo libris Iuliani. quos octo edidit post illos quattuor, quibus ante respondi. hoc enim cum Romae accepisset frater Alypius, nondum omnes descripserat, cum oblatam occasionem noluit praeterire, per quam mihi quinque transmisit promittens alios tres cito esse missurum et multum instans, ne respondere differrem. cuius instantia coactus sum remissius agere, quod agebam, ut operi utrique non deessem uni diebus alteri noctibus. quantum mihi ab aliis occupationibus hinc atque inde uenire non desistentibus parceretur. agebam uero rem plurimum necessariam; nam retractabam opuscula mea et. si quid in eis me offenderet uel alios posset offendere, partim reprehendendo partim defendendo, quod legi posset et deberet, operabar. et duo iam uolumina absolueram retractatis omnibus libris meis, quorum numerum nesciebam eosque CCXXX et duos esse cognoui: restabant epistulae, deinde tractatus populares, quas Graeci homilias uocant. et plurimas iam epistularum legeram, sed adhuc nihil inde dictaueram. cum me etiam isti Iuliani libri occupare coeperunt, quorum nunc quarto respondere iam coepi. quando ergo id explicauero quintoque respondero, si tres non superuenerint, dispono, si dominus uoluerit, et, quod poscis, incipere simul agens utrumque et hoc scilicet et illud de retractatione opusculorum meorum nocturnis et diurnis temporibus in singula distributis.

### English translation (Claude)

This is where I am answering the books of Julian which he published, eight in number, after the four I answered before. When brother Alypius received them at Rome, he had not yet copied all of them when he did not want to miss an opportunity that offered, and by it sent me five, promising to send the other three soon and pressing me hard not to delay my reply. Compelled by his urging, I have had to slacken what I was doing so as not to fail either work, giving one the days and the other the nights, as far as I was spared by other business that keeps coming from every side. And I was doing something very necessary: I was revising my works, and if anything in them offended me or could offend others, I was setting out, partly by correcting and partly by defending, what could and should be read. I had already finished two volumes, having revised all my books, whose number I did not know, and I found them to be two hundred and thirty-two. The letters remained, then the sermons to the people, which the Greeks call homilies. I had already read most of the letters, but had dictated nothing on them yet, when these books of Julian began to occupy me as well; I have now begun to answer the fourth of them. When I have finished it and answered the fifth, if the other three have not arrived, I plan, if the Lord wills, to begin what you ask too, doing both together, this and the revision of my works, dividing the night and day hours between them.

### Translation notes

- The two volumes are the Retractations; the reply to Julian is the Unfinished Work against Julian.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 224.2 (CSEL 57:452–453; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-2).

## Letter 224.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-3
- Source: CSEL 57:453–454
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Quodvultdeus to pray for him and to help the bearer in his business.

### Latin text

Hoc ideo insinuo sanctitati tuae, ut, quantum tibi desiderium est sumendi, quod poscis, tanto flagrantius a domino mihi poscas adiutorium, quo seruiam laudabili studio tuo atque utilitati eorum, quibus id existimas profuturum, domine sinceriter dilectissime frater. commendo iterum perlatorem et negotium, propter quod eo perrexit. cum cognoueris. apud quem agendum sit, peto, ne pigeat adiuuare; non enim possumus necessitates hominum eius modi deserere. qui nostri non coloni sed, quod maius est, fratres sunt et in caritate Christi ad curam pertinent nostram. deo uiuas.

### English translation (Claude)

I tell Your Holiness this so that, the more you desire to receive what you ask, the more ardently you may ask the Lord for help for me, by which I may serve your praiseworthy zeal and the benefit of those you think it will profit, my lord, sincerely most beloved brother. I commend the bearer again and the business for which he has gone there. When you learn with whom it must be handled, please do not mind helping; for we cannot abandon the needs of such men, who are not our tenants but, what is more, our brothers, and who belong to our care in the love of Christ. May you live to God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 224.3 (CSEL 57:453–454; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/220-1/#p-224-3).

## Letter 225.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-1
- Source: CSEL 57:454–455
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper of Aquitaine writes to Augustine to report a matter harmful to the faith.

### Latin text

Ignotus quidem tibi facie sed iam aliquatenus, si reminiscaris, animo ac sermone compertus — nam per sanctum fratrem meum Leontium diaconum misi epistulas et recepi — nunc quoque beatitudini tuae scribere audeo non solum salutationis ut tunc studio sed etiam fidei, qua ecclesia uiuit, affectu. excubante enim pro uniuersis membris corporis Christi uigilantissima industria tua et aduersus haereticarum doctrinarum insidias ueritatis uirtute pugnante nullo modo mihi uerendum putaui, ne onerosus tibi aut importunus essem in eo, quod ad multorum salutem ac perinde ad pietatem tuam pertinet, cum potius reum futurum esse me crederem, si ea, quae ualde perniciosa intellego, ad specialem patronum fidei non referrem.

### English translation (Claude)

Unknown to you by face, but already known to you to some extent in mind and speech, if you remember (for I sent and received letters through my holy brother the deacon Leontius), I now again dare to write to Your Blessedness, not only out of the wish to greet you, as then, but also out of devotion to the faith by which the Church lives. Since your most vigilant diligence keeps watch for all the members of the body of Christ and fights by the power of truth against the snares of heretical doctrines, I thought I need not at all fear being burdensome or importunate to you in a matter that concerns the salvation of many and therefore your goodness; rather, I believed I would be guilty if I did not refer what I see to be very harmful to the special patron of the faith.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Prosper of Aquitaine to Augustine (428/429).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.1 (CSEL 57:454–455; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-1).

## Letter 225.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-2
- Source: CSEL 57:455–457
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper reports that monks at Marseilles reject Augustine's teaching on the calling of the elect, and that On Rebuke and Grace has hardened their opposition.

### Latin text

Multi ergo seruorum Christi, qui in Massiliensi urbe consistunt, in sanctitatis tuae scriptis, quae aduersus Pelagianos haereticos condidisti, contrarium putant patrum opinioni et ecclesiastico sensui, quicquid in eis de uocatione electorum secundum dei propositum disputasti. et cum aliquamdiu tarditatem suam culpare maluerint quam non intellecta reprehendere quidamque eorum lucidiorem super hoc atque apertiorem beatitudinis tuae expositionem uoluerint postulare, euenit ex dispositione misericordiae dei, ut, cum quosdam intra Africam similia mouissent, librum de correptione et gratia plenum diuinae auctoritatis emitteres. quo in notitiam nostram insperata opportunitate delato putauimus omnes querelas resistentium sopiendas, quia uniuersis quaestionibus, de quibus consulenda erat sanctitas tua, tam plene illic absoluteque responsum est, quasi hoc specialiter studueris, ut, quae apud nos erant turbata. componeres. recensito autem hoc beatitudinis tuae libro. sicut, qui sanctam atque apostolicam doctrinae tuae auctoritatem antea sequebantur, intellegentiores multo instructioresque sunt facti, ita, qui persuasionis suae impediebantur obscuro. auersiores, quam fuerant, recesserunt. quorum tam abrupta dissensio primum propter ipsos metuenda est, ne tam claris tamque egregiis in omnium uirtutum studio uiris spiritus Pelagianae impietatis inludat, deinde ne simpliciores quique, apud quos horum magna est de probitatis contemplatione reuerentia, hoc tutissimum sibi aestiment, quod audiant eos. quorum auctoritatem sine iudicio sequuntur. adserere.

### English translation (Claude)

Many of the servants of Christ who live in the city of Marseilles think that whatever you argued in Your Holiness's writings against the Pelagian heretics about the calling of the elect according to God's purpose is contrary to the opinion of the fathers and the mind of the Church. For some time they preferred to blame their own slowness rather than to criticize what they did not understand, and some of them wanted to ask Your Blessedness for a clearer and plainer explanation of this. Then it came about by the disposition of God's mercy that, since similar questions had troubled some in Africa, you issued the book On Rebuke and Grace, full of divine authority. When it reached us by an unhoped-for opportunity, we thought all the complaints of the objectors would be laid to rest, since all the questions on which Your Holiness needed to be consulted are answered there so fully and completely, as if you had made it your special aim to settle what was disturbed among us. But when this book of Your Blessedness had been read, those who already followed the holy and apostolic authority of your teaching became much more understanding and better instructed, while those who were hindered by the obscurity of their own conviction withdrew more opposed than they had been. Their abrupt dissent is to be feared, first for their own sake, lest the spirit of Pelagian impiety make sport of men so distinguished and outstanding in the pursuit of every virtue; then lest the simpler people, who have great reverence for these men because of their evident uprightness, think that what they hear asserted by those whose authority they follow without judgment is the safest course for them.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:28: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Marseilles group are those later called “Semi-Pelagians” (a modern term). Allusion: Rom 8:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.2 (CSEL 57:455–457; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-2).

## Letter 225.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-3
- Source: CSEL 57:457–460
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper sets out the Marseilles monks' position: grace is offered to all, predestination rests on foreknowledge of faith, and Augustine's doctrine breeds fatalism and despair and is new.

### Latin text

Haec enim ipsorum definitio ac professio est: omnem quidem hominem Adam peccante peccasse et neminem per opera sua sed per dei gratiam regeneratione saluari. uniuersis tamen hominibus propitiationem, quae est in sacramento sanguinis Christi, sine exceptione esse propositam, ut, quicumque ad fidem et ad baptismum accedere uoluerint, salui esse possint. qui autem credituri sunt quiue in ea fide, quae deinceps per gratiam sit iuuanda, mansuri sunt, praescisse ante mundi constitutionem deum et eos praedestinasse in regnum suum, quos gratis uocatos dignos futuros electione et de hac uita bono fine excessuros esse praeuiderit. ideoque omnem hominem ad credendum et ad operandum diuinis institutionibus admoneri, ut de adprehendenda uita aeterna nemo desperet, cum uoluntariae deuotioni remuneratio sit parata. hoc autem propositum uocationis dei, quo uel ante mundi initium uel in ipsa conditione generis humani eligendorum et reiciendorum dicitur facta discretio, ut, secundum quod placuit creatori, alii uasa honoris alii uasa contumeliae sint creati, et lapsis curam resurgendi adimere et sanctis occasionem teporis adferre eo, quod in utramque partem superfluus labor sit, si neque reiectus ulla industria possit intrare neque electus ulla neglegentia possit excidere. quoquo enim modo se egerint, non posse aliud erga eos. quam deus definiuit, accidere et sub incerta spe cursum non posse esse constantem, cum, si aliud habeat praedestinantis electio, cassa sit adnitentis intentio. remoueri itaque omnem industriam tollique uirtutes, si dei constitutio humanas praeueniat uoluntates, et sub hoc praedestinationis nomine fatalem quandam induci necessitatem aut diuersarum naturarum dici dominum conditorem, si nemo aliud possit esse, quam factus sit. utque breuius ac plenius, quod opinantur, exponam, quicquid in libro hoc ei contradicentium sensu sanctitas tua sibi opposuit, quicquid etiam in libris contra Iulianum ab ipso sub hac quaestione obiectum potentissime debellasti, hoc totum ab istis sanctis intentiosissime conclamatur. et cum contra eos scripta beatitudinis tuae ualidissimis et innumeris testimoniis diuinarum scripturarum instructa proferimus ac secundum formam disputationum tuarum aliquid etiam ipsi. quo concludantur, adstruimus, obstinationem suam uetustate defendunt et ea, quae de epistula apostoli Pauli Romanis scribentis ad manifestationem diuinae gratiae praeuenientis electorum merita proferuntur, a nullo umquam ecclesiasticorum ita esse intellecta, ut nunc sentiuntur, adfirmant. cumque, ut ipsi ea exponant, secundum quorum uelint sensa, deposcimus, nihil se profitentur inuenisse, quod placeat, et de his taceri exigunt, quorum altitudinem nullus adtigerit. eo postremo peruicacia tota descendit, ut fidem nostram aedificationi audientium contrariam esse definiant ac sic, etiam si uera sit, non promendam, quia et perniciose non recipienda tradantur et nullo periculo, quae intellegi nequeant, conticeantur.

### English translation (Claude)

For this is their definition and profession: that every man sinned when Adam sinned, and that no one is saved by his own works but by the grace of God through regeneration; yet that the propitiation which is in the sacrament of the blood of Christ is offered to all men without exception, so that whoever wishes to come to faith and to baptism can be saved. They say that God foreknew before the foundation of the world who would believe or who would persevere in that faith, which must afterwards be helped by grace, and that he predestined to his kingdom those whom, called freely, he foresaw would be worthy of election and would leave this life with a good end. Therefore every man is admonished by the divine teachings to believe and to act, so that no one may despair of attaining eternal life, since a reward is prepared for voluntary devotion. But this purpose of God's calling, by which, either before the beginning of the world or in the very creation of the human race, a separation is said to have been made of those to be chosen and those to be rejected, so that, as it pleased the Creator, some were created vessels of honor and others vessels of dishonor, they say both takes from the fallen the concern to rise again and gives the saints an occasion of lukewarmness, since labor is superfluous either way if the rejected cannot enter by any effort and the elect cannot fall away by any negligence. For however they act, nothing can happen to them other than what God has determined, and under an uncertain hope the course cannot be steady, since, if the choice of the one predestining holds otherwise, the effort of the one striving is in vain. So, they say, all effort is removed and virtues abolished if God's decree precedes human wills; under this name of predestination a kind of fatal necessity is introduced, or the Creator is said to be the author of different natures, if no one can be other than he was made. And to set out their opinion more briefly and fully: whatever Your Holiness raised against yourself in this book in the sense of those who contradict you, and whatever objection on this question you most powerfully defeated in the books against Julian, all this these holy men cry out most strenuously. And when we bring against them the writings of Your Blessedness, armed with the strongest and countless testimonies of the divine Scriptures, and after the pattern of your arguments ourselves add something to corner them, they defend their obstinacy by antiquity, and assert that the passages brought from the apostle Paul's letter to the Romans to show the divine grace that precedes the merits of the elect were never understood by any churchman as they are now understood. And when we ask them to explain these passages according to whose sense they please, they say they have found nothing that satisfies them, and demand silence about things whose depth no one has reached. Their obstinacy finally goes so far as to declare that our faith is contrary to the edification of hearers, and so, even if true, ought not to be brought forward, since what should not be received is harmful when taught, and there is no danger in keeping silent about what cannot be understood.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 3:25: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Prosper reports the views of others, not his own. Allusions: Rom 9:21 (vessels of honor and dishonor); Rom 3:25 (propitiation).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.3 (CSEL 57:457–460; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-3).

## Letter 225.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-4
- Source: CSEL 57:460–461
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper describes how some at Marseilles reduce prevenient grace to the grace of creation and make the beginning of salvation lie in the natural will.

### Latin text

Quidam uero horum in tantum a Pelagianis semitis non declinant, ut. cum ad confitendam eam Christi gratiam, quae omnia praeueniat merita humana, cogantur, ne, si meritis redditur, frustra gratia nominetur, ad condicionem hanc uelint uniuscuiusque hominis pertinere, in qua eum nihil prius merentem quia nec existentem liberi arbitrii et rationalem gratia creatoris instituat, ut per discretionem boni ac mali et ad cognitionem dei et ad oboedientiam mandatorum eius possit suam dirigere uoluntatem atque ad hanc gratiam, qua in Christo renascimur, peruenire per naturalem scilicet facultatem petendo, quaerendo, pulsando, ut ideo accipiat. ideo inueniat, ideo introeat, quia bono naturae bene usus ad istam saluantem gratiam initialis gratiae ope meruerit peruenire. propositum autem uocantis gratiae in hoc omnino definiunt, quod deus constituerit nullum in regnum suum nisi per sacramentum regenerationis adsumere et ad hoc salutis donum omnes homines uniuersaliter siue per naturalem siue per scriptam legem siue per euangelicam praedicationem uocari. ut et, qui uoluerint. fiant filii dei et inexcusabiles sint, qui fideles esse noluerint, quia iustitia dei in eo sit, ut. qui non crediderint. pereant. bonitas in eo appareat, si neminem repellat a uita, sed indifferenter uniuersos uelit saluos fieri et in agnitionem ueritatis uenire. iam hic proferunt testimonia, quibus diuinarum scripturarum cohortatio ad oboediendum incitat hominum uoluntates, qui ex libero arbitrio aut faciant, quae iubentur, aut neglegant. et consequens putant, ut, quia praeuaricator ideo dicitur non oboedisse, quia noluit, fidelis quoque non dubitetur ob hoc deuotus fuisse, quia uoluit, et quantum quisque ad malum tantum habeat facultatis ad bonum parique momento animum se uel ad uitia uel ad uirtutes mouere, quem bona adpetentem gratia dei foueat, mala sectantem damnatio iusta suscipiat.

### English translation (Claude)

Some of them, indeed, do not turn aside from the Pelagian paths so far that, when they are compelled to confess the grace of Christ that precedes all human merits (lest, if it is given for merits, it be called grace in vain), they want it to refer to the state of each man in which the Creator's grace established him, deserving nothing beforehand since he did not even exist, as free in choice and rational, so that by distinguishing good and evil he can direct his will both to the knowledge of God and to obedience to his commandments, and can reach this grace by which we are reborn in Christ through, of course, his natural capacity, by asking, seeking and knocking: so that he receives, finds and enters because, having used the good of nature well, he has deserved by the help of that initial grace to reach this saving grace. The purpose of the calling grace they define entirely as this: that God determined to take no one into his kingdom except through the sacrament of regeneration, and that all men universally are called to this gift of salvation, whether through the natural law, or the written law, or the preaching of the gospel, so that those who are willing may become sons of God, and those who were unwilling to believe may be without excuse; for God's justice lies in this, that those who have not believed perish, and his goodness appears in this, that he repels no one from life but wills all without distinction to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. Here they bring forward the testimonies in which the exhortation of the divine Scriptures urges the wills of men to obey, men who by free choice either do what is commanded or neglect it. And they think it follows that, since the transgressor is said not to have obeyed because he did not will to, the faithful man too must be held without doubt to have been devout because he willed to; and that each man has as much capacity for good as for evil, and moves his mind with equal force either to vices or to virtues: God's grace fosters it when it seeks the good, and just condemnation receives it when it follows evil.

### Scripture references

- Matt 7:7: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:12: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 7:7; John 1:12; Rom 1:20; 1 Tim 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.4 (CSEL 57:460–461; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-4).

## Letter 225.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-5
- Source: CSEL 57:461–463
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper reports how the Marseilles monks explain the different fates of infants and unevangelized nations by God's foreknowledge of their future merits.

### Latin text

Cumque inter haec innumerabilium illis multitudo obicitur paruulorum, qui utique excepto originali peccato, sub quo omnes homines similiter in primi hominis damnatione nascuntur, nullas adhuc habentes uoluntates, nullas proprias actiones non sine iudicio dei secernuntur, ut ante discretionem boni ac mali de usu uitae istius auferendi alii per regenerationem inter caelestis regni adsumantur heredes alii sine baptismo inter mortis perpetuae transeant debitores, tales aiunt perdi talesque saluari. quales futuros illos in annis maioribus, si ad actiuam seruarentur aetatem, scientia diuina praeuiderit. nec considerant se gratiam dei, quam comitem, non praeuiam humanorum uolunt esse meritorum, etiam illis uoluntatibus subdere, quas ab ea secundum suam phantasiam non negant esse praeuentas. sed in tantum quibuscumque commenticiis meritis electionem dei subiciunt, ut, quia praeterita non extant. futura. quae non sint futura, confingant nouoque apud illos absurditatis genere et non agenda praescita sint et praescita non acta sint. hanc sane de humanis meritis praescientiam dei, secundum quam gratia uocantis operetur, multo sibi rationabilius uidentur adstruere, cum ad earum nationum contemplationem uenitur, quae uel in praeteritis saeculis dimissae sunt ingredi uias suas uel nunc quoque adhuc in ueteris ignorantiae impietate depereunt nec ulla eis aut legis aut euangelii inluminatio coruscauit. cum tamen, in quantum praedicatoribus ostium apertum est et uia facta est, gentium populus, qui sedebat in tenebris et in umbra mortis, lucem uiderit magnam et, qui quondam non populus, nunc autem populus dei sit et, quorum aliquando non misertus est, nunc autem misereatur, praeuisos inquiunt a domino credituros et ad unamquamque gentem ita dispensata tempora ac ministeria magistrorum. ut exortura erat bonarum credulitas uoluntatum; nec uacillare illud, quod deus omnes homines uelit saluos fieri et in agnitionem ueritatis uenire, quando quidem inexcusabiles sint, qui et ad unius ueri dei cultum potuerint instrui intellegentia naturali et euangelium ideo non audierint quia nec fuerint recepturi.

### English translation (Claude)

And when, in the midst of this, the multitude of countless infants is put to them as an objection, infants who, apart from original sin, under which all men are equally born in the condemnation of the first man, have as yet no wills and no actions of their own, and yet are not separated without God's judgment, so that, being taken from the use of this life before they can distinguish good and evil, some through regeneration are taken up among the heirs of the heavenly kingdom and others without baptism pass among the debtors of eternal death, they say that such are lost and such saved according as divine knowledge foresaw what they would be in their later years if they were kept until the age of action. They do not consider that they are subjecting the grace of God, which they want to be the companion and not the forerunner of human merits, even to those wills which, by their own fancy, they do not deny were preceded by it. But they subject God's election to merits of any kind, however fictitious, so far that, since past merits do not exist, they invent future ones that will never be; and by a new kind of absurdity among them, things are foreknown that will not be done, and things foreknown are not done. This foreknowledge by God of human merits, according to which the grace of the One who calls is said to work, they think they establish far more reasonably when they come to consider those nations which in past ages were left to walk in their own ways, or even now still perish in the impiety of their ancient ignorance, on whom no light either of law or of gospel has shone. Yet, insofar as the door has been opened and the way made for preachers, the people of the Gentiles who sat in darkness and the shadow of death have seen a great light, and those once not a people are now the people of God, and those on whom he once had no mercy he now has mercy on. These, they say, were foreseen by the Lord as believers, and the times and ministries of teachers were so arranged for each nation as the belief of good wills was going to arise. Nor, they say, does it waver that God wills all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth, since those are without excuse who could have been taught by natural understanding to worship the one true God, and did not hear the gospel because they would not have received it.

### Scripture references

- Acts 14:16: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 4:16: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:25: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 2:10: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 2:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Acts 14:16; Isa 9:2 / Matt 4:16; Hos 2:23 / Rom 9:25; 1 Pet 2:10; 1 Tim 2:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.5 (CSEL 57:461–463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-5).

## Letter 225.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-6
- Source: CSEL 57:463–464
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper reports that the Marseilles monks hold Christ died for all, reject a fixed number of the elect, and make human obedience precede grace.

### Latin text

pro uniuerso autem humano genere mortuum esse dominum nostrum Iesum Christum et neminem prorsus a redemptione sanguinis eius exceptum, etiam si omnem hanc uitam alienissima ab eo mente pertranseat, quia ad omnes homines pertineat diuinae misericordiae sacramentum, quo ideo plurimi non renouentur, quia, quod nec renouari uelle habeant. praenoscantur. itaque, quantum ad deum pertinet, omnibus paratam uitam aeternam, quantum autem ad arbitrii libertatem, ab his eam adprehendi, qui deo sponte crediderint et auxilium gratiae merito credulitatis acceperint. in istam uero talis gratiae praedicationem hi, quorum contradictione offendimur, cum prius meliora sentirent, ideo se uel maxime contulerunt, quia, si profiterentur ab ea omnia bona merita praeueniri et ab ipsa, ut possint esse, donari, necessitate concederent deum secundum propositum et consilium uoluntatis suae occulto iudicio et opere manifesto aliud uas condere in honorem aliud in contumeliam, quia nemo nisi per gratiam iustificetur et nemo nisi in praeuaricatione nascatur. sed refugiunt istud fateri diuinoque adscribere operi sanctorum merita formidant nec adquiescunt praedestinatum electorum numerum nec augeri posse nec minui, ne locum apud infideles ac neglegentes cohortantium incitamenta non habeant ac superflua sit industriae ac laboris indictio, cuius studium cessante electione frustrandum sit; ita demum enim posse unumquemque ad correctionem aut ad profectum uocari. si sciat se sua diligentia bonum esse posse et libertatem suam ob hoc dei auxilio iuuandam, si, quod deus mandat, elegerit. ac sic, cum in his, qui tempus acceperunt liberae uoluntatis, duo sint, quae humanam operentur salutem, dei scilicet gratia et hominis oboedientia, priorem uolunt oboedientiam esse quam gratiam, ut initium salutis ex eo, qui saluatur, non ex eo credendum sit stare, qui saluat, et uoluntas hominis diuinae gratiae sibi pariat opem, non gratia sibi humanam subiciat uoluntatem.

### English translation (Claude)

They say that our Lord Jesus Christ died for the whole human race, and that no one at all is excepted from the redemption of his blood, even if he passes all this life with a mind utterly estranged from him, because the sacrament of divine mercy belongs to all men; and that very many are not renewed by it because they are foreknown not even to wish to be renewed. Therefore, as far as God is concerned, eternal life is prepared for all; but as far as freedom of choice is concerned, it is grasped by those who have believed God of their own accord and have received the help of grace as the merit of their belief. Those whose opposition troubles us, though they formerly thought better, have taken up this preaching of such a grace chiefly because, if they professed that all good merits are preceded by grace and given by it so that they can exist, they would necessarily concede that God, according to the purpose and counsel of his will, by a hidden judgment and a manifest work, makes one vessel for honor and another for dishonor, since no one is justified except through grace and no one is born except in transgression. But they shrink from confessing this; they are afraid to ascribe the merits of the saints to the work of God, and they do not accept that the predestined number of the elect can neither be increased nor diminished, lest the urgings of those who exhort have no place among unbelievers and the negligent, and the imposition of effort and labor be superfluous, since its zeal would be frustrated if election were lacking. For only so, they say, can each man be called to correction or to progress, if he knows that by his own diligence he can be good and that his freedom will be helped by God's aid for this, if he chooses what God commands. And so, since in those who have reached the age of free will there are two things that work human salvation, namely God's grace and man's obedience, they want obedience to come before grace, so that the beginning of salvation must be believed to rest with the one who is saved, not with the One who saves, and so that the will of man obtains for itself the help of divine grace, not grace subjecting the human will to itself.

### Scripture references

- Eph 1:11: allusion, medium confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Eph 1:11; Rom 9:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.6 (CSEL 57:463–464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-6).

## Letter 225.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-7
- Source: CSEL 57:464–466
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper says the opponents' standing, some now bishops, silences resistance, and begs Augustine to explain the obscure questions clearly.

### Latin text

Quod cum peruersissimum esse reuelante dei misericordia et instruente nos tua beatitudine nouerimus, possumus quidem ad non credendum esse constantes, sed ad auctoritatem talia sentientium non sumus pares, quia multum nos et uitae meritis antecellunt et aliqui eorum adepto nuper summi sacerdotii honore supereminent; nec facile quisquam praeter paucos perfectae gratiae intrepidos amatores tanto superiorum disputationibus ausus est contra ire. ex quo non solum his. qui eos audiunt, uerum etiam ipsis, qui audiuntur, cum dignitatibus creuit periculum, dum et multos reuerentia eorum aut inutili cohibet silentio aut incurioso ducit adsensu et saluberrimum ipsis uidetur, quod paene nullius contradictione reprehenditur. unde si in istis Pelagianae reliquiis prauitatis non mediocris uirulentiae fibra nutritur, si principium salutis male in homine conlocatur, si diuinae uoluntati impie uoluntas humana praefertur, ut ideo quis adiuuetur, quia uoluit, non ideo. quia adiuuatur, uelit, si originaliter malus receptionem boni non a summo bono sed a semet ipso inchoare male creditur, si non aliunde deo placetur, nisi ex eo, quod ipse donauerit, tribue nobis in hac causa, papa beatissime, pater optime. quantum iuuante domino potes, diligentiam pietatis tuae, ut, quae in istis quaestionibus obscuriora et ad percipiendum difficiliora sunt, quam lucidissimis expositionibus digneris aperire.

### English translation (Claude)

Since we know, by the revelation of God's mercy and your teaching, Your Blessedness, that this is most perverse, we can stand firm in not believing it; but we are not equal to the authority of those who hold such views, for they far surpass us in the merits of their lives, and some of them stand above us having recently attained the honor of the highest priesthood. Nor has anyone easily dared to go against the arguments of men so much his superiors, except a few fearless lovers of perfect grace. As a result the danger has grown with their dignities, not only for those who hear them but also for those who are heard, while reverence for them holds many in a useless silence or leads them to careless assent, and what is contradicted by almost no one seems to them most sound. Therefore, if in these remnants of the Pelagian perversity a fiber of no small virulence is being nourished; if the beginning of salvation is wrongly placed in man; if the human will is impiously put before the divine will, so that a man is helped because he willed, not wills because he is helped; if a man evil by origin is wrongly believed to begin receiving good not from the highest Good but from himself; if God is pleased by nothing except what he himself has given: then grant us in this cause, most blessed pope, best of fathers, as far as you can with the Lord's help, the diligence of your goodness, and deign to open with the clearest explanations what is more obscure and harder to grasp in these questions.

### Translation notes

- “The highest priesthood”: the episcopate (Hilary of Arles became bishop in 429). Papa (“pope”) was a title used of bishops generally.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.7 (CSEL 57:464–466; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-7).

## Letter 225.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-8
- Source: CSEL 57:466–467
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper lists questions for Augustine: the danger of the error, grace and free choice, the relation of foreknowledge and purpose, exhortation, and the earlier fathers' view of predestination by foreknowledge.

### Latin text

Ac primum, quia plerique non putant Christianam fidem hac dissensione uiolari, quantum periculi sit in eorum persuasione, patefacias; deinde, quo modo per istam praeoperantem et cooperantem gratiam liberum non impediatur arbitrium; tum, utrum praescientia dei ita secundum propositum maneat, ut ea ipsa, quae sunt proposita, sint accipienda praescita, an per genera causarum et species personarum ista uarientur, ut, quia diuersae sunt uocationes in his, qui nihil operaturi saluantur, quasi solum dei propositum uideatur existere, in his autem, qui aliquid boni acturi sunt, per praescientiam possit stare propositum, an uero uniformiter, licet diuidi praescientia a proposito temporali distinctione non possit. praescientia tamen quodam ordine sit subnixa proposito et. sicut nihil sit quorumcumque negotiorum, quod non scientia diuina praeuenerit, ita nihil sit boni, quod in nostram participationem non deo auctore defluxerit; postremo. quem ad modum per hanc praedicationem propositi dei, quo fideles fiunt, qui praeordinati sunt ad uitam aeternam, nemo eorum, qui cohortandi sunt, impediatur nec occasionem neglegentiae habeant, si se praedestinatos esse desperent. illud etiam qualiter diluatur, quaesumus, patienter insipientiam nostram ferendo demonstres, quod retractatis priorum de hac re opinionibus, paene omnium par inuenitur et una sententia, qua propositum et praedestinationem dei secundum praescientiam receperunt, ut ob hoc deus alios uasa honoris alios contumeliae fecerit, quia finem uniuscuiusque praeuiderit et, sub ipso gratiae adiutorio in qua futurus esset uoluntate et actione, praescierit.

### English translation (Claude)

First, since most people do not think the Christian faith is violated by this dissent, show how much danger lies in their conviction. Next, how free choice is not impeded by this grace that works beforehand and works with us. Then, whether God's foreknowledge remains according to his purpose in such a way that the very things purposed are to be taken as foreknown; or whether this varies by kinds of cases and types of persons, so that, since callings differ, in those who are saved without doing any work God's purpose alone seems to exist, while in those who are going to do some good the purpose may rest on foreknowledge; or whether it is uniform, so that, although foreknowledge cannot be divided from purpose by a difference in time, foreknowledge nevertheless rests in a certain order on purpose, and, as there is nothing in any affairs whatever that divine knowledge has not anticipated, so there is no good that has not flowed into our participation from God as its author. Finally, how, by this preaching of God's purpose by which those become believers who have been foreordained to eternal life, none of those who must be exhorted is hindered, nor do they have an occasion for negligence if they despair of being predestined. We also ask you, bearing patiently with our foolishness, to show how this is to be answered: that when the opinions of earlier writers on this matter are reviewed, almost all are found to hold one and the same view, by which they took God's purpose and predestination as according to foreknowledge, so that God made some vessels of honor and others of dishonor because he foresaw the end of each, and foreknew in what will and action each would be under the very help of grace.

### Scripture references

- Acts 13:48: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 9:21: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Acts 13:48; Rom 9:21.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.8 (CSEL 57:466–467; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-8).

## Letter 225.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-9
- Source: CSEL 57:467–468
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Prosper hopes Augustine's reply will win over the opponents, mentions Hilary of Arles, and urges him to write again on grace.

### Latin text

Quibus omnibus enodatis et multis insuper, quae altiore intuitu ad causam hanc pertinentia magis potes uidere, discussis credimus et speramus non solum tenuitatem nostram disputationum tuarum praesidio roborandam sed etiam ipsos, quos meritis atque honoribus claros caligo istius opinionis obscurat. defaecatissimum lumen gratiae recepturos. nam unum eorum praecipuae auctoritatis et spiritalium studiorum uirum, sanctum Hilarium, Arelatensem episcopum, sciat beatitudo tua admiratorem sectatoremque in aliis omnibus tuae esse doctrinae et de hoc, quod in querelam trahit, iam pridem apud sanctitatem tuam sensum suum per litteras uelle conferre. sed quia, utrum hoc facturus aut quo fine sit facturus, incertum est et omnium nostrum fatigatio prouidente hoc praesenti saeculo dei gratia in tuae caritatis et scientiae uigore respirat, adde eruditionem humilibus, adde increpationem superbis. necessarium et utile est etiam, quae scripta sunt, scribere, ne leue existimetur, quod non frequenter arguitur. sanum enim putant esse, quod non dolet, nec uulnus superductum cute sentiunt; sed intellegant peruenturum ad sectionem, quod habuerit perseuerantem tumorem. gratia dei et pax domini nostri Iesu Christi coronet te in omni tempore et ambulantem de uirtute in uirtutem glorificet in aeternum, domine papa beatissime, ineffabiliter mirabilis, incomparabiliter honorande, praestantissime patrone.

### English translation (Claude)

When all these points have been untied, and many more besides, which you with your deeper insight can better see to belong to this cause, have been discussed, we believe and hope that not only will our feebleness be strengthened by the defense of your arguments, but those too, distinguished by merits and honors, whom the fog of this opinion darkens, will receive the purest light of grace. For let Your Blessedness know that one of them, a man of outstanding authority and spiritual pursuits, the holy Hilary, bishop of Arles, is an admirer and follower of your teaching in all other matters, and that on this point which he calls into complaint he has long wished to share his view with Your Holiness by letter. But since it is uncertain whether he will do this, or to what purpose, and since the weariness of all of us finds relief, by God's providing grace in this present age, in the vigor of your love and knowledge, add instruction for the humble and rebuke for the proud. It is necessary and useful to write even what has been written, lest what is not often refuted be thought trivial. For they think healthy what does not hurt, and do not feel a wound covered over by skin; but let them understand that what keeps a persistent swelling will come to the knife. May the grace of God and the peace of our Lord Jesus Christ crown you at all times and glorify you forever as you go from strength to strength, my lord pope most blessed, ineffably wonderful, incomparably to be honored, most excellent patron.

### Scripture references

- Ps 84:7 (83:8 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Identification of this Hilary with Hilary of Arles is debated; the text names him so. Allusion: Ps 84:7 (LXX 83:8).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 225.9 (CSEL 57:467–468; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/225-1/#p-225-9).

## Letter 226.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-1
- Source: CSEL 57:468–469
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary, a layman of Gaul, introduces his report to Augustine on teachings contrary to the truth.

### Latin text

Si cessantibus contradicentium quaestionibus gratae sunt plerumque studiosorum inquisitiones, ut etiam illa. quae absque periculo ignorarentur, ediscant, arbitror gratiorem fore sedulitatem nostrae relationis, quae, dum indicat secundum quorundam prosecutiones quaedam aduersantia ueritati, non tam sibi quam illis, qui turbantur et turbant, per consilium sanctitatis tuae satagit prouideri, domine beatissime ac toto affectu desiderande et multum in Christo suscipiende pater.

### English translation (Claude)

If, when there are no questions from opponents, the inquiries of the studious are usually welcome, so that they may learn even things that could be unknown without danger, I think the diligence of our report will be the more welcome, since, in pointing out certain things contrary to the truth according to the arguments of some, it seeks to provide, through Your Holiness's counsel, not so much for itself as for those who are troubled and who trouble others, my lord most blessed, father to be longed for with all affection and to be greatly revered in Christ.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Hilary, a layman of southern Gaul and friend of Prosper, to Augustine (429).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.1 (CSEL 57:468–469; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-1).

## Letter 226.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-2
- Source: CSEL 57:469–470
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the Gallic opponents hold that the fallen can still will to be healed and believe, and that grace then helps those who begin to will.

### Latin text

Haec sunt itaque, quae Massiliae uel etiam aliquibus locis in Gallia uentilantur: nouum et inutile esse praedicationi, quod quidam secundum propositum eligendi dicantur, ut id nec arripere ualeant nec tenere nisi credendi uoluntate donata. excludi putant omnem praedicandi uigorem, si nihil, quod per eam excitetur, in hominibus remansisse dicatur. consentiunt omnem hominem in Adam perisse nec inde quemquam posse proprio arbitrio liberari: sed id conueniens adserunt ueritati uel congruum praedicationi, ut, cum prostratis et numquam, suis uiribus surrecturis adnuntiatur obtinendae salutis occasio, eo merito, quo uoluerint et crediderint a suo morbo se posse sanari, et ipsius fidei augmentum et totius sanitatis suae consequantur effectum. ceterum ad nullum opus uel incipiendum nedum perficiendum quemquam sibi sufficere posse consentiunt; neque enim alicui operi curationis eorum adnumerandum putant exterrita et supplici uoluntate unumquemque aegrotum uelle sanari. quod enim dicitur: Crede et saluus eris, unum horum exigi adserunt aliud offerri, ut propter id, quod exigitur, si redditum fuerit. id, quod offertur, deinceps tribuatur. unde consequens putant exhibendam ab eo fidem, cuius naturae id uoluntate conditoris concessum est, et nullam ita deprauatam uel extinctam putant. ut non debeat uel possit se uelle sanari. propter quod uel sanetur quis a sua uel, si noluerit, cum sua aegritudine puniatur. nec negari gratiam. si praecedere dicatur talis uoluntas, quae tantum medicum. quaerat, non autem quicquam ipsa iam ualeat. nam illa testimonia, ut est illud: Sicut unicuique partitus est mensuram fidei et similia, ad id uolunt ualere, ut iuuetur. qui coeperit uelle, non ut etiam donetur. ut uelit, reiectis ab, hoc dono aliis pariter reis et qui possent similiter liberari, si ea, quae pariter indignis praestatur, credendi uoluntas etiam ipsis similiter praestaretur. si autem, aiunt, dicatur uel talem omnibus remansisse, qua uel contemnere quis ualeat uel oboedire. de compendio putant reiectorum reddi electorum uel reiectorum in eo, quod unicuique meritum propriae uoluntatis adiungitur.

### English translation (Claude)

These, then, are the things being aired at Marseilles and in some other places in Gaul. They say it is new and useless for preaching that some are said to be chosen according to purpose in such a way that they can neither grasp nor hold it unless the will to believe is given them. They think all the force of preaching is excluded if nothing is said to remain in men that preaching may arouse. They agree that every man perished in Adam and that no one can be freed from that by his own choice; but they assert that it is in keeping with the truth and suited to preaching that, when the opportunity of obtaining salvation is announced to those who are prostrate and will never rise by their own strength, they should, by the merit of willing and believing that they can be healed of their disease, obtain both the increase of faith itself and the effect of their whole healing. For the rest, they agree that no one can suffice for himself to begin, let alone complete, any work; for they do not think it should be counted as any work of their healing that each sick person, terrified and suppliant, wishes to be healed. For in the saying, “Believe and you will be saved,” they say one thing is demanded and another offered, so that, on account of what is demanded, if it is rendered, what is offered is then granted. Hence they think it follows that faith is to be shown by the one to whose nature this has been granted by the Creator's will, and they think no nature so depraved or extinguished that it ought not or cannot will to be healed. So a man is either healed of his sickness, or, if he is unwilling, punished with his sickness. Nor, they say, is grace denied if such a will is said to precede, one that only seeks so great a physician but can itself do nothing. For they want testimonies such as “As he has apportioned to each the measure of faith,” and the like, to mean that he who has begun to will is helped, not that he is given the willing too, since others, equally guilty, would be excluded from this gift, who could likewise be freed if the will to believe, which is given to the equally unworthy, were given to them likewise. But if, they say, it is said that such a will has remained in all, by which one can either despise or obey, they think the account of the rejected and the elect is thereby settled, since each is credited with the merit of his own will.

### Scripture references

- Acts 16:31: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Acts 16:31; Rom 12:3. The last sentence is corrupt in the digital text (de compendio putant reiectorum reddi electorum uel reiectorum…); translated by the probable sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.2 (CSEL 57:469–470; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-2).

## Letter 226.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-3
- Source: CSEL 57:470–472
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the opponents appeal to Augustine's own earlier writings (Letter 102 against Porphyry and the Exposition of Propositions from Romans) for election based on foreseen faith.

### Latin text

Cum autem dicitur eis, quare aliis uel alicubi praedicetur uel non praedicetur uel nunc praedicetur, quod aliquando paene omnibus sicut nunc aliquibus gentibus non praedicatum sit, dicunt id praescientiae esse diuinae, ut eo tempore et ibi et illis ueritas adnuntiaretur uel adnuntietur, quando et ubi praesciebatur esse credenda. et hoc non solum aliorum catholicorum testimoniis sed etiam sanctitatis tuae disputatione antiquiore se probare testantur, ubi tamen eandem gratiam non minore ueritatis perspicuitate docueris, ut est illud, quod dixit sanctitas tua in quaestione contra Porphyrium de tempore Christianae religionis: Tunc uoluisse hominibus apparere Christum et apud eos praedicari doctrinam suam, quando sciebat et ubi sciebat esse, qui in eum fuerant credituri uel illud de libro in epistula ad Romanos: Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc conqueritur?nam uoluntati eius quis resistit? cui sane inquisitioni inquis, sic respondet,. ut intellegamus spiritalibus uiris etiam non secundum terrenum hominem uiuentibus patere posse prima merita fidei et impietatis, quo modo deus praescientia eligat credituros et damnet incredulos nec illos ex operibus eligens nec istos ex operibus damnans sed et illorum fidei praestans, ut bene operentur, et istorum impietatem deserendo obdurans, ut male operentur; et iterum in eodem libro superius: Aequales omnes sunt ante meritum nec potest in rebus omni modo aequalibus electio nominari. sed quoniam spiritus sanctus non datur nisi credentibus, non quidem deus eligit opera, quae ipse largitur, cum dat spiritum sanctum, ut per caritatem bona operemur, sed tamen eligit fidem, quia, nisi quisque credat et in accipiendi uoluntate permaneat, non accipit donum dei, id est spiritum sanctum. per quem infusa caritate bonum possit operari. non ergo eligit opera cuiusquam in praescientia, quae ipse donaturus est, sed fidem eligit in praescientia, ut, quem crediturum esse praesciuit, ipsum eligeret, cui spiritum sanctum daret, ut bona operando etiam aeternam uitam consequeretur. dicit enim apostolus: Idem deus, qui operatur omnia in omnibus. nusquam autem dictum est: Deus credit omnia in omnibus; quod enim credimus, nostrum est, quod autem operamur, illius et cetera in eodem opere. quae se acceptare et probare testantur tamquam conuenientia euangelicae ueritati.

### English translation (Claude)

And when they are asked why the gospel is preached to some or in some places and not to others, or is preached now, when once it was not preached to almost all nations, as now it is not to some, they say this belongs to divine foreknowledge: that the truth was or is announced at that time, in that place and to those people when and where it was foreknown that it would be believed. And they claim to prove this not only from the testimonies of other Catholics but also from an earlier discussion of Your Holiness, although there you taught the same grace with no less clarity of truth. Such is what Your Holiness said in the question against Porphyry on the time of the Christian religion: that Christ chose to appear to men and to have his teaching preached among them when and where he knew there were those who would believe in him. Or this, from the book on the Letter to the Romans: “You say to me, then: ‘Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will?’” To this inquiry, you say, he answers “so that we may understand that to spiritual men, who do not live according to the earthly man, the first merits of faith and impiety may be clear: how God by foreknowledge chooses those who will believe and condemns unbelievers, neither choosing the former for their works nor condemning the latter for their works, but granting to the faith of the former that they work well, and hardening the impiety of the latter by abandoning them, so that they work evil.” And again, earlier in the same book: “All are equal before merit, and in things in every way equal there can be no talk of choice. But since the Holy Spirit is given only to believers, God does not indeed choose works, which he himself bestows when he gives the Holy Spirit so that we may do good through love; yet he does choose faith, because unless each one believes and remains in the will to receive, he does not receive the gift of God, that is, the Holy Spirit, through whom love is poured in so that he can do good. So he does not choose in foreknowledge anyone's works, which he himself is going to give, but he chooses faith in foreknowledge, so that he chose the very one he foreknew would believe, to give him the Holy Spirit, so that by doing good works he might also attain eternal life. For the apostle says: ‘It is the same God who works all things in all.’ But nowhere is it said, ‘God believes all things in all’; for that we believe is ours, but what we do well is his,” and the rest in the same work. They declare that they accept and approve these passages as agreeing with the truth of the gospel.

### Scripture references

- Rom 9:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 12:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 5:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Augustine, Letter 102.14 (on Porphyry's question) and Exposition of Some Propositions from Romans 60–62 (Augustine later corrected these views in the Retractations). Quotations within: Rom 9:19; 1 Cor 12:6; Rom 5:5 (allusion).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.3 (CSEL 57:470–472; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-3).

## Letter 226.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-4
- Source: CSEL 57:472–474
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the opponents reduce predestination to foreknowledge of faith, deny that perseverance is given irresistibly, and reject Wisdom 4:11 as non-canonical.

### Latin text

Ceterum praescientiam et praedestinationem uel propositum ad id ualere contendunt, ut eos praescierit uel praedestinauerit uel proposuerit eligere, qui fuerant credituri. nec de hac fide posse dici: Quid habes, quod non accepisti? cum in eadem natura remanserit licet uitiata, quae prius sana ac perfecta donata sit. quod autem dicit sanctitas tua neminem perseuerare nisi perseuerandi uirtute percepta, hactenus accipiunt, ut, quibus datur, inerti licet, praecedenti tamen proprio arbitrio tribuatur. quod ad hoc tantum liberum adserunt, ut uelit uel nolit admittere medicinam. ceterum et ipsi abominari se et damnare testantur, si quis quicquam uirium in aliquo remansisse, quo ad sanitatem progredi possit, existimet. nolunt autem ita hanc perseuerantiam praedicari, ut non uel suppliciter emereri uel amitti contumaciter possit. nec ad incertum uoluntatis dei deduci se uolunt, ubi eis, quantum putant, ad obtinendum uel admittendum euidens est, qualecumque sit, initium uoluntatis. illud etiam testimonium, quod posuisti: Raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum eius, tamquam non canonicum definiunt omittendum. unde illam praescientiam sic accipiunt, ut propter fidem futuram praesciti sint intellegendi; nec cuiquam talem dari perseuerantiam, a qua non permittatur praeuaricari, sed a qua possit sua uoluntate deficere et infirmari.

### English translation (Claude)

For the rest, they contend that foreknowledge and predestination or purpose mean only that God foreknew, predestined or purposed to choose those who were going to believe. And they say that of this faith one cannot say, “What do you have that you did not receive?”, since it has remained in the same nature, although vitiated, that was first given healthy and whole. As for Your Holiness's statement that no one perseveres unless he has received the power to persevere, they accept it only so far as to say that it is granted to those to whom it is given when their own choice, however feeble, has preceded. They assert that choice is free only to this extent, that it can will or refuse to admit the medicine. For the rest, they too declare that they abhor and condemn anyone who thinks any strength remains in anyone by which he could advance to health. But they do not want this perseverance preached in such a way that it cannot either be earned by supplication or lost by obstinacy. Nor do they want to be led to the uncertainty of God's will when, as they think, the beginning of the will, such as it is, is evident for obtaining or admitting. The testimony you cited, “He was snatched away lest wickedness change his understanding,” they declare must be set aside as not canonical. Hence they understand that foreknowledge thus: that people are to be understood as foreknown on account of their future faith; and that to no one is such perseverance given that he is not permitted to fall away, but only such that he can fail and weaken by his own will.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 4:7: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 4:11 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 4:7; Wis 4:11 (cited by Augustine in On Rebuke and Grace 13.40; Hilary reports that the opponents reject it as not canonical).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.4 (CSEL 57:472–474; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-4).

## Letter 226.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-5
- Source: CSEL 57:474
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports the objection that exhortation and rebuke are useless if the elect and the rejected are fixed and nothing in man can respond.

### Latin text

Adserunt inutilem exhortandi consuetudinem, si nihil in homine remansisse dicatur. quod correptio ualeat excitare. quod quidem inesse naturae sic se dicere confitentur, ut hoc ipso, quod ignoranti ueritas praedicatur, ad beneficium praesentis gratiae referendum sit. nam si sic praedestinati sunt, inquiunt, ad utramque partem, ut de aliis ad alios nullus possit accedere, quo pertinet tanta extrinsecus correptionis instantia, si ab homine etsi non fides integra saltem uel dolor compunctae infirmitatis exoritur aut periculum demonstratae mortis horretur? nam si non potest timere quis, unde terretur, nisi ea uoluntate, quae sumitur, non ex eo culpandum, quod nunc non uult, sed in eo et cum eo, qui sic aliquando noluit, ut eam damnationem cum suis posteris mereretur incurrere. ut numquam recta, semper autem praua uellet appetere. si autem est qualiscumque dolor, qui ad exhortationem corripientis oriatur, hanc ipsam causam dicunt, propter quam uel reiciatur alius uel alius adsumatur, atque ita non opus esse partes constitui, quibus nec adiciendum sit aliquid nec detrahendum.

### English translation (Claude)

They assert that the custom of exhorting is useless if nothing is said to remain in man that rebuke can arouse. They admit they say that this is in nature in such a way that, by the very fact that the truth is preached to someone ignorant of it, it must be credited to the benefit of present grace. “For if,” they say, “people are so predestined to either side that no one can pass from the one to the other, what is the point of so much insistent rebuke from outside, unless from the man himself there arises, if not full faith, at least the grief of a weakness pricked to the heart, or a horror at the danger of death shown him? For if one cannot fear what he is threatened with except by a will that is received, he is not to be blamed for not willing now, but the blame lies in him and with him who once so refused that he deserved to incur that condemnation with his descendants, so that he would never desire what is right but always what is evil. But if there is some grief, of whatever kind, that arises at the exhortation of the one rebuking, this,” they say, “is the very reason why one is rejected and another taken up; and so there is no need to fix sides to which nothing may be added or taken away.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.5 (CSEL 57:474; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-5).

## Letter 226.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-6
- Source: CSEL 57:474–476
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the opponents object to Augustine's contrast between Adam's grace and the gift of perseverance to the elect, saying it produces despair.

### Latin text

Deinde moleste ferunt ita diuidi gratiam, quae uel tunc primo homini data est uel nunc omnibus detur, ut ille acceperit perseuerantiam, non qua fieret. ut perseueraret, sed sine qua per liberum arbitrium perseuerare non posset, nunc uero sanctis in regnum per gratiam praedestinatis non tale adiutorium perseuerantiae detur. sed tale, ut eis perseuerantia ipsa donetur, non solum ut sine isto dono perseuerantes esse non possint, uerum etiam ut per hoc donum non nisi perseuerantes sint his uerbis sanctitatis tuae ita mouentur, ut dicant quandam desperationem hominibus exhiberi. si enim, aiunt. ita Adam adiutus est, ut et stare posset in iustitia et a iustitia declinare, et nunc ita sancti iuuantur, ut declinare non possint, si quidem eam acceperunt uolendi perseuerantiam, ut aliud uelle non possint, uel sic quidam deseruntur, ut aut nec accedant aut, si accesserint, et recedant, ad illam uoluntatem pertinuisse dicunt exhortationis uel comminationis utilitatem. quae et persistendi ac desistendi obtinebat liberam potestatem, non ad hanc, cui nolle iustitiam ineuitabili necessitate coniunctum est praeter illos, qui sic concreati sunt his, qui cum uniuersa massa damnati sunt, ut exciperentur per gratiam liberandi. unde in hoc solo uolunt a primo homine. omnium distare naturam, ut illum integris uiribus uoluntatis iuuaret gratia nolentem, sine qua perseuerare non poterat, hos autem amissis et perditis uiribus credentes tantum non solum erigat prostratos, uerum etiam suffulciat ambulantes. ceterum quicquid libet donatum sit praedestinatis, id posse et amitti et retineri propria uoluntate contendunt; quod tunc falsum esset, si uerum putarent eam quosdam perseuerantiam percepisse, ut nisi perseuerantes esse non possint.

### English translation (Claude)

Next, they take it ill that grace, whether that given then to the first man or that given now to all, is so divided that he received perseverance (“not one by which it came about that he persevered, but one without which he could not persevere through free choice; but now to the saints predestined to the kingdom through grace not such a help to perseverance is given, but such that perseverance itself is given them, not only so that without this gift they cannot persevere, but also so that by this gift they cannot but persevere”). These words of Your Holiness move them so much that they say a kind of despair is presented to men. “For if,” they say, “Adam was helped in such a way that he could both stand in righteousness and turn from righteousness, and now the saints are helped in such a way that they cannot turn away, since they have received a perseverance of will such that they cannot will otherwise, or some are so abandoned that they either do not come or, if they come, also go back,” then they say the usefulness of exhortation and threat belonged to that will which had the free power both of persisting and of desisting, not to this one to which unwillingness for righteousness is joined by inevitable necessity, except for those who are so created together with those condemned with the whole mass that they were exempted by the grace of the one who frees. Hence they want the nature of all to differ from the first man in this alone: that grace helped him, with the strength of his will intact, when he did not will, as without it he could not persevere, while these, whose strength is lost and ruined, it not only raises up when they lie prostrate if only they believe, but also supports as they walk. For the rest, they contend that whatever has been given to the predestined can be both lost and kept by their own will; which would be false if they thought it true that some have received perseverance such that they cannot but persevere.

### Translation notes

- The quoted words are from Augustine, On Rebuke and Grace 12.34. The middle of the section is involved and partly unclear in the Latin; translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.6 (CSEL 57:474–476; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-6).

## Letter 226.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-7
- Source: CSEL 57:476–477
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the opponents deny a fixed number of the elect, interpret 1 Tim 2:4 of all without exception, and dispute Augustine's use of texts on Saul and David.

### Latin text

Inde est, quod et illud pariter non accipiunt, ut eligendorum reiciendorumque esse definitum numerum nolint atque illius sententiae expositionem non eam, quae a te est deprompta, suscipiant, id est ut non nisi omnes homines saluos fieri uelit et non eos tantum. qui ad sanctorum numerum pertinebunt, sed omnes omnino, ut nullus habeatur exceptus. nec hoc timendum, quod quidam eo inuito perire dicantur; sed quo modo, aiunt, non uult a quoquam peccari uel deseri iustitiam et tamen iugiter illa deseritur contra eius uoluntatem committunturque peccata. ita eum uelle saluare omnes homines nec tamen omnes homines saluari. testimonia etiam scripturae, quae de Saule uel de Dauid posuisti, non pertinere putant ad quaestionem, quae de exhortatione uersatur; alia autem ad id referunt, ut ex his eam gratiam accipiant commendari, qua unusquisque post uoluntatem iuuatur, uel ad ipsam uocationem, quae praestatur indignis. hoc enim et illis locis tuorum opusculorum et aliorum. quae persequi longum est, se demonstrare testantur.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence also they equally do not accept that the number of those to be chosen and rejected is fixed, and they do not take the interpretation of that saying which you put forward, but hold that he wills all men without exception to be saved, not only those who will belong to the number of the saints, but absolutely all, so that no one is excepted. Nor, they say, should we fear the statement that some perish against his will; for, they say, just as he does not will that anyone sin or abandon righteousness, and yet righteousness is constantly abandoned and sins are committed against his will, so he wills to save all men and yet not all men are saved. They also think the testimonies of Scripture you cited about Saul and David do not bear on the question, which concerns exhortation; and others they refer to the grace by which each is helped after he wills, or to the calling itself, which is granted to the unworthy. They claim to show this both from those passages of your works and from others which it would be long to go through.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:4: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 1 Tim 2:4. Augustine's interpretation is in On Rebuke and Grace 14.44; the Saul and David texts in 14.45.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.7 (CSEL 57:476–477; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-7).

## Letter 226.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-8
- Source: CSEL 57:477–478
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary reports that the opponents dismiss the argument from infants, appeal to earlier authorities, and ask why the doctrine needed to be raised at all.

### Latin text

Paruulorum autem causam ad exemplum maiorum non patiuntur adferri. quam et tuam sanctitatem dicunt eatenus attigisse, ut incertum esse uolueris ac potius de eorum poenis malueris dubitari. quod in libro tertio de libero arbitrio ita positum meministi, ut hanc eis occasionem potuerit exhibere. hoc etiam de aliorum libris, quorum est in ecclesia auctoritas, faciunt, quod perspicit sanctitas tua non parum posse iuuare contradictores, nisi maiora aut certe uel paria proferantur a nobis; non enim ignorat prudentissima pietas tua, quanto plures sint in ecclesia, qui auctoritate nominum in sententia teneantur aut a sententia transferantur. ad summam fatigatis omnibus nobis ad id prosecutio eorum uel potius querela conuertitur consentientibus etiam his, qui hanc definitionem inprobare non audent, ut dicant: Quid opus fuit huiusce modi disputationis incerto tot minus intellegentium corda turbari? neque enim minus utiliter sine hac definitione. aiunt, tot annis a tot tractatoribus tot praecedentibus libris et tuis et aliorum cum contra alios tum maxime contra Pelagianos catholicam fidem fuisse defensam.

### English translation (Claude)

They do not allow the case of infants to be brought forward as an example for adults. They say Your Holiness too touched on it only so far as to wish it left uncertain and to prefer that their punishments be doubted; you remember you put it in the third book On Free Choice in a way that could give them this occasion. They do the same with the books of others who have authority in the Church, which, as Your Holiness sees, can help the opponents not a little unless greater or at least equal authorities are brought forward by us; for your most prudent goodness knows how many more there are in the Church who are held in an opinion, or moved from it, by the authority of names. In sum, when we are all worn out, their argument, or rather complaint, comes to this, and even those who do not dare to reject this definition agree with them in saying: “What need was there to trouble the hearts of so many less intelligent people with the uncertainty of such a discussion? For,” they say, “the Catholic faith was defended no less usefully without this definition for so many years by so many writers in so many earlier books, both yours and others', against other heretics and especially against the Pelagians.”

### Translation notes

- Augustine, On Free Choice 3.23.66–68.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.8 (CSEL 57:477–478; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-8).

## Letter 226.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-9
- Source: CSEL 57:478–479
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary explains that he sends only a summary, notes the high rank of some opponents, and says they admire Augustine in everything but this.

### Latin text

Haec, mi pater, et alia interminabiliter plura sic, ut summa mea uota confitear, per me deferre maluissem uel, quia hoc non merui. saltem prolixiore tempore omnia, quibus mouentur, collecta dirigere, ut, quicquid de hac re contra dicitur, quatenus refelli uel, si id non potest, tolerari deberet, audirem. sed quia neutrum ex uoto prouenit, malui, quo modo potui, haec comprehensa dirigere quam penitus de tanta quorundam contradictione reticere. sunt ex parte tales personae, ut his consuetudine ecclesiastica laicos summam reuerentiam necesse sit exhibere. quod quidem ita curauimus deo iuuante seruare, ut, cum opus fuit, non taceremus, quae ad quaestionis huius assertionem exiguitas nostrarum uirium suggerebat. sed nunc summatim, quantum festinatio perlatoris admisit, haec uelut commonendo suggessi. tuae sanctae prudentiae est dispicere, quid facto opus sit, ut talium et tantorum superetur uel temperetur intentio. cui ego iam parum prodesse existimo te reddere rationem, nisi et addatur auctoritas, quam transgredi infatigabiliter contentiosa corda non possint. sed plane illud tacere non debeo, quod se dicant tuam sanctitatem hoc excepto in factis et dictis omnibus admirari. tuum erit decernere, quo modo sit in hoc eorum contradictio toleranda. nec mireris; quod aliter uel aliqua in hac epistula addidi, quantum puto, quae in superiore non dixeram; talis est enim nunc eorum definitio praeter illa, quae per festinationem aut obliuionem fortasse praeterii.

### English translation (Claude)

These things, my father, and endlessly many more, I would have preferred, to confess my highest wish, to bring you myself; or, since I did not deserve that, at least to send you, after a longer time, everything that troubles them, collected, so that I might hear how far whatever is said against this doctrine ought to be refuted or, if that cannot be done, tolerated. But since neither happened as I wished, I preferred to send these things summarized as best I could rather than keep entirely silent about such great opposition from certain people. Some of them are persons of such rank that by church custom laymen must show them the highest reverence. We have taken care, with God's help, to observe this in such a way that, when it was needed, we did not keep silent about what the smallness of our strength suggested in defense of this question. But now I have set these things down in summary, as a reminder, as far as the haste of the bearer allowed. It is for your holy prudence to see what must be done so that the determination of such and so great men may be overcome or moderated. I think it will do little good now for you to give them reasons unless authority is added which untiringly contentious hearts cannot get past. But I certainly must not keep silent about this: they say they admire Your Holiness in all your deeds and words except this. It will be for you to decide how their opposition on this point is to be borne. And do not be surprised if in this letter I have added some things, or put them differently, which, I think, I had not said in my earlier letter; for such is now their position, apart from things I may have passed over through haste or forgetfulness.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.9 (CSEL 57:478–479; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-9).

## Letter 226.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-10
- Source: CSEL 57:479–481
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Hilary asks for Augustine's Retractations and On Grace and Free Choice, mentions the enclosed letter of Prosper, and asks prayers for his brother and wife who have vowed continence.

### Latin text

Libros, cum editi fuerint, quos de uniuerso opere moliris, quaeso habere mereamur, maxime ut per eorum auctoritatem, si qua tibi in tuis displicent, a dignitate tui nominis iam non trepidi sequestremus. librum etiam de gratia et libero arbitrio non habemus: superest, ut eum, quia utilem quaestioni confidimus. mereamur accipere. nolo autem sanctitas tua sic me arbitretur haec scribere, quasi de his, quae nunc edidisti. ego dubitem. sufficiat mihi poena mea, quod a praesentiae tuae deliciis exulatus, ubi salubribus tuis uberibus nutriebar, non solum absentia tua crucior uerum etiam peruicacia quorundam, qui non tantum manifesta respuunt, sed etiam non intellecta reprehendunt. ceterum hac suspicione in tantum careo, ut potius infirmitatem meam, qua tales parum patienter fero, notabilem putem. qualiter autem ad haec consulendum iudices, ut dixi. tuae sapientiae derelinquo. nam ad me hoc pertinere credidi pro ea, quam Christo uel tibi debeo, caritate, ut, quae in quaestionem ueniunt, non tacerem. quicquid pro ea gratia, quam in te pusilli cum magnis miramur, uolueris aut ualueris, gratissime accipiemus, tamquam a nobis carissima et reuerentissima auctoritate decretum. sane, quia urgente perlatore timui, ne uel non omnia uel haec ipsa minus digne conscius mearum uirium possem dirigere, egi cum uiro tum moribus tum eloquio et studio claro, ut, quanta posset. collecta suis litteris intimaret. quas coniunctas his destinare curaui. est enim talis, qui etiam praeter hanc necessitatem dignus tuae sanctitatis notitia iudicetur. sanctus Leontius diaconus, cultor tuus, cum meis parentibus multum te salutat. memorem mei paternitatem tuam dominus Christus ecclesiae suae annis pluribus donare dignetur, domine pater. [Et infra:] Sciat sanctitas tua fratrem meum, cuius maxime causa hinc discessimus, cum matrona sua ex consensu perfectam deo continentiam deuouisse. unde rogamus sanctitatem tuam. ut orare digneris, quo hoc ipsum in eis dominus confirmare et custodire dignetur.

### English translation (Claude)

I ask that we may have the books you are preparing on your whole work, when they are published, especially so that by their authority, if anything in your writings displeases you, we may set it apart, no longer fearful of the dignity of your name. We also do not have the book On Grace and Free Choice; it remains that we may receive it, since we trust it is useful for the question. I do not want Your Holiness to think that I write this as if I doubted what you have now published. Let my punishment be enough for me: exiled from the delight of your presence, where I was nourished at your wholesome breasts, I am tormented not only by your absence but also by the obstinacy of some who not only reject what is plain but also criticize what they have not understood. For the rest, I am so free of this suspicion that I rather think my own weakness, by which I bear such people with too little patience, is noteworthy. How you judge that this should be dealt with, as I said, I leave to your wisdom. For I believed it belonged to me, for the love I owe to Christ and to you, not to keep silent about what is coming into question. Whatever you will or can do for the grace that we, small and great, admire in you, we will receive most gratefully as decreed by an authority most dear and most revered to us. Since, with the bearer pressing, I feared, conscious of my strength, that I could not send everything, or even this, worthily enough, I arranged with a man distinguished in character, eloquence and learning to set out in his own letter as much as he could gather. I have taken care to send it joined to this; for he is one who, even apart from this need, would be judged worthy of Your Holiness's acquaintance. The holy deacon Leontius, your devotee, greets you warmly together with my parents. May the Lord Christ deign to grant your fatherhood, mindful of me, to his Church for many years, my lord father. [And below:] Let Your Holiness know that my brother, chiefly on whose account we left there, has with his wife by mutual consent vowed perfect continence to God. So we ask Your Holiness to deign to pray that the Lord may confirm and guard this in them.

### Translation notes

- The “books on your whole work” are the Retractations; the enclosed letter is Prosper's (Letter 225). “[And below:]” is in the edition, marking a postscript.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 226.10 (CSEL 57:479–481; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-226-10).

## Letter 227.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-227-1
- Source: CSEL 57:481–484
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Alypius of the baptism of Gabinianus and of the physician Dioscorus, converted after his daughter's healing and successive blindness and paralysis.

### Latin text

Frater Paulus hic est incolumis; adportat negotiorum suorum secundas curas; praestabit dominus, ut etiam ipsa ultima sint. multum uos salutat et narrat gaudia de Gauiniano, quod ab illa sua causa misericordia dei liberatus non solum Christianus sed etiam fidelis sit ualde bonus per pascha proxime baptizatus in corde atque in ore habens gratiam, quam percepit. quantum eum desiderem, quando explicabo? sed nosti, ut eum diligam. archiater etiam Dioscorus Christianus fidelis est simul gratiam consecutus. audi etiam quem ad modum; neque enim ceruicula illa uel lingua nisi aliquo prodigio domarentur. filia eius, in qua unica adquiescebat, aegrotabat et usque ad totam desperationem salutis temporalis eodem ipso patre renuntiante peruenit. dicitur ergo — et constat, cum mihi hoc et ante fratris Pauli reditum comes Peregrinus, uir laudabilis et bene Christianus, qui cum eis eodem tempore baptizatus est, indicaret —, dicitur ergo ille senex tandem conuersus ad inplorandam Christi misericordiam uoto se obligasse Christianum fore, si illam saluam uideret. factum est. at ille. quod uouerat, dissimulabat exoluere. sed adhuc manus excelsa. nam repentina caecitate suffunditur statimque uenit in mentem, unde illud esset. exclamauit confitens atque iterum uouit se recepto lumine impleturum esse, quod uouerat. recepit, impleuit. et adhuc manus excelsa. symbolum non tenuerat aut fortasse tenere recusauerat et se non potuisse excusauerat. deus uident. iam tamen post festa omnia receptionis suae in paralysin soluitur multis ac paene omnibus membris tunc somnio admonitus confitens per scripturam ob hoc sibi dictum esse accidisse, quod symbolum non reddiderit. post illam confessionem redduntur officia membrorum omnium nisi linguae solius. se tamen didicisse symbolum ideoque memoria iam tenere nihilo minus in eadem temptatione litteris fassus est et omnis est ab eo deleta nugacitas, quae, ut scis. multum dedecorabat naturalem quandam eius benignitatem eumque insultantem Christianis faciebat ualde sacrilegum. quid dicam domino, nisi hymnum canamus et superexaltemus eum in saecula? amen.

### English translation (Claude)

Brother Paul is here, safe and sound; he brings a favorable outcome of his affairs; the Lord will grant that it may be the last. He greets you warmly and tells joyful news of Gabinianus: that, delivered by God's mercy from that case of his, he is not only a Christian but even one of the faithful, a very good one, baptized this last Easter, having in heart and mouth the grace he received. When shall I express how much I long for him? But you know how I love him. The chief physician Dioscorus too is one of the Christian faithful, having received grace at the same time. Hear how, too; for that stiff neck and tongue could not have been tamed without some prodigy. His daughter, in whom alone he found rest, fell ill and came to complete despair of her temporal health, her father himself giving her up. It is said, and it is certain, since Count Peregrinus, a praiseworthy man and a good Christian, who was baptized with them at the same time, told me so even before brother Paul's return, it is said, then, that the old man, at last turning to implore Christ's mercy, bound himself by a vow to become a Christian if he saw her well. It happened. But he put off fulfilling what he had vowed. But the hand was still raised high. For he was suddenly struck with blindness, and at once it came to his mind why. He cried out, confessing, and vowed again that if his sight were restored he would fulfill what he had vowed. He recovered it; he fulfilled it. And still the hand was raised high. He had not learned the Creed, or perhaps had refused to learn it and had excused himself on the ground that he could not. God knows. But now, after all the festivities of his reception, he was struck with paralysis in many and almost all his limbs; then, warned in a dream, he confessed in writing that he had been told this had happened to him because he had not recited the Creed. After that confession the use of all his limbs was restored except his tongue alone. Yet, still in that same trial, he admitted in writing that he had learned the Creed and so now held it in memory; and all that frivolity has been wiped out of him which, as you know, greatly disgraced a certain natural kindness of his and made him, in his mockery of Christians, very sacrilegious. What shall I say to the Lord, but let us sing a hymn and exalt him above all forever? Amen.

### Scripture references

- Isa 9:12: allusion, low confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Pr Azar 35 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Alypius (ca. 428). “The hand was still raised high”: allusion to Isa 9:12 etc. “God knows”: the digital text reads deus uident, evidently a slip (for uidet or uiderit); translated by sense. The closing phrase echoes the Song of the Three Young Men (Dan 3:57 LXX/Vulgate).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 227.1 (CSEL 57:481–484; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/226-1/#p-227-1).

## Letter 228.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-1
- Source: CSEL 57:484–485
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds Bishop Honoratus that he has already advised, in a letter to Quodvultdeus, that clergy must not abandon their people during the barbarian invasion.

### Latin text

Caritati tuae misso exemplo epistulae, quam fratri Quoduultdeo nostro coepiscopo scripsi, putabam me hoc onere caruisse, quod mihi inposuisti quaerendo consilium, quid in his periculis, quae tempora nostra inuenerunt, facere debeatis. quamuis enim epistulam illam breuiter scripserim, nihil me tamen praetermisisse arbitror, quod et respondenti dicere et quaerenti audire sufficeret, quando quidem dixi nec eos esse prohibendos, qui ad loca, si possunt, munita migrare desiderant, et ministerii nostri uincula, quibus nos Christi caritas alligauit, ne deseramus ecclesias, quibus seruire debemus, non esse rumpenda. ista quippe uerba sunt, quae in illa epistula posui: Restat ergo, inquam, ut nos, quorum ministerium quantulaecumque plebi dei, ubi sumus, manenti ita necessarium est, ut sine hoc eam non oporteat remanere, dicamus domino: Esto nobis in deum protectorem et in locum munitum.

### English translation (Claude)

When I sent Your Charity a copy of the letter I wrote to our brother and fellow bishop Quodvultdeus, I thought I was free of the burden you laid on me in asking advice on what you ought to do in these dangers that have come upon our times. For although I wrote that letter briefly, I think I left out nothing that would be enough for the one answering to say and the one asking to hear, since I said both that those who wish to move to fortified places, if they can, should not be prevented, and that the bonds of our ministry, by which the love of Christ has bound us not to desert the churches we ought to serve, must not be broken. These are the words I put in that letter: “It remains, then,” I said, “that we, whose ministry is so necessary to the people of God, however small, who remain where we are, that they ought not to remain without it, should say to the Lord: ‘Be to us a God of protection and a fortified place.’”

### Scripture references

- Ps 71:3 (70:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Honoratus, bishop of Thiava (428/429), during the Vandal invasion. Quotation: Ps 71:3 (LXX 70:3).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.1 (CSEL 57:484–485; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-1).

## Letter 228.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-2
- Source: CSEL 57:485–486
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Christ's command to flee persecution applies when a minister is personally sought, not when the whole people is endangered and needs its clergy.

### Latin text

Sed hoc consilium tibi propterea non sufficit, ut scribis, ne contra domini praeceptum uel exemplum facere nitamur, ubi fugiendum esse de ciuitate in ciuitatem monet; recolimus enim uerba dicentis: Cum autem persequentur uos in ciuitate ista, fugite in aliam. quis autem credat ita hoc dominum fieri uoluisse, ut necessario ministerio, sine quo uiuere nequeunt, desererentur greges, quos suo sanguine comparauit? numquid hoc fecit ipse, quando portantibus parentibus in Aegyptum paruulus fugit, qui nondum ecclesias congregauerat, quas ab eo desertas fuisse dicamus? numquid, quando apostolus Paulus, ne illum comprehenderet inimicus, per fenestram in sporta submissus est et effugit manus eius, deserta est, quae ibi erat, ecclesia necessario ministerio et non ab aliis fratribus ibidem constitutis, quod oportebat, impletum est? eis quippe uolentibus hoc apostolus fecerat, ut se ipsum seruaret ecclesiae, quem proprie persecutor ille quaerebat. faciant ergo serui Christi, ministri uerbi et sacramenti eius. quod praecepit siue permisit. fugiant omnino de ciuitate in ciuitatem, quando eorum quisquam specialiter a persecutoribus quaeritur, ut ab aliis, qui non ita requiruntur. non deseratur ecclesia, sed praebeant cibaria conseruis suis, quos aliter uiuere non posse nouerunt. cum autem omnium, id est episcoporum et clericorum et laicorum est commune periculum, hi, qui aliis indigent, non deserantur ab his. quibus indigent. aut igitur ad loca munita omnes transeant aut, qui habent remanendi necessitatem, non relinquantur ab eis, per quos illorum est ecclesiastica supplenda necessitas, ut aut pariter uiuant aut pariter sufferant, quod eos pater familias uolet perpeti.

### English translation (Claude)

But this advice does not satisfy you, you write, because we should not strive to act against the Lord's command or example, where he warns us to flee from city to city; for we remember the words of the one who says: “When they persecute you in this city, flee to another.” But who would believe that the Lord wanted this done in such a way that the flocks he bought with his own blood should be deprived of the necessary ministry without which they cannot live? Did he himself do this when, as a little child, he fled into Egypt carried by his parents, when he had not yet gathered churches that we could say were deserted by him? When the apostle Paul was let down through a window in a basket so that the enemy would not seize him, and escaped his hands, was the church that was there deprived of the necessary ministry, and was it not fulfilled, as was right, by other brothers stationed there? Indeed the apostle had done this at their wish, so as to preserve himself for the Church, since that persecutor was seeking him in particular. Let the servants of Christ, then, the ministers of his word and sacrament, do what he commanded or permitted. Let them by all means flee from city to city when any one of them is sought in particular by the persecutors, so that the church is not deserted by the others, who are not sought in this way; let them provide food for their fellow servants, who they know cannot live otherwise. But when the danger is common to all, that is, to bishops, clergy and laity, let not those who need others be deserted by those whom they need. Either, therefore, let all move to fortified places, or let those who must remain not be left by those through whom their church needs must be supplied, so that they may either live together or suffer together what the Father of the household wills them to endure.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:23: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 20:28: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 24:45: allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 10:23. Allusions: Acts 20:28; Matt 2:13–14; 2 Cor 11:32–33 (Acts 9:25); Matt 24:45.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.2 (CSEL 57:485–486; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-2).

## Letter 228.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-3
- Source: CSEL 57:486
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that clergy who stay with their people and suffer lay down their lives for the brothers, as 1 John 3:16 commands.

### Latin text

Quod si contigerit, ut siue alii maius alii minus siue omnes aequaliter patiantur, qui eorum sint, qui pro aliis patiuntur, apparet, illi scilicet qui cum se possent talibus malis eripere fugiendo, ne aliorum necessitatem desererent, manere maluerunt. hinc maxime probatur illa caritas, quam Iohannes apostolus commendat dicens: Sicut Christus pro nobis animam suam posuit, sic et nos debemus animas pro fratribus ponere. nam qui fugiunt uel suis deuincti necessitatibus fugere non possunt, si comprehensi patiantur, pro se ipsis non pro fratribus utique patiuntur; qui uero propterea patiuntur, quia fratres. qui eis ad Christianam salutem indigebant, deserere noluerunt, sine dubio suas animas pro fratribus ponunt.

### English translation (Claude)

If it happens that some suffer more and others less, or all suffer equally, it is clear which of them are those who suffer for others: namely those who, although they could have rescued themselves from such evils by fleeing, preferred to remain so as not to desert the need of others. Here above all is proved that love which the apostle John commends when he says: “As Christ laid down his life for us, so we too ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.” For those who flee, or cannot flee because bound by their own necessities, if they are caught and suffer, surely suffer for themselves and not for the brothers; but those who suffer because they would not desert the brothers who needed them for their Christian salvation without doubt lay down their lives for the brothers.

### Scripture references

- 1 John 3:16: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 John 3:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.3 (CSEL 57:486; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-3).

## Letter 228.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-4
- Source: CSEL 57:486–487
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine grants that flight from barbarians is acceptable for those without church office, but says the minister who stays bears greater fruit of love than a martyr who fled for himself.

### Latin text

Unde illud. quod episcopum quendam dixisse audiuimus: Si dominus nobis imperauit fugam in eis persecutionibus. ubi potest fructus esse martyrii, quanto magis debemus fugere steriles passiones, quando est barbaricus et hostilis incursus!" uerum est quidem et acceptabile sed his, quos ecclesiastici officii non tenent uincula. nam qui clades hostiles ideo non fugit. cum posset effugere, ne deserat ministerium Christi, sine quo non possunt homines uel fieri uel uiuere Christiani, maiorem caritatis inuenit fructum, quam qui non propter fratres sed propter se ipsum fugiens atque comprehensus non negat Christum suscipitque martyrium.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence what we heard a certain bishop said, “If the Lord commanded us to flee in those persecutions where there can be the fruit of martyrdom, how much more ought we to flee barren sufferings when there is an invasion of barbarian enemies!”, is true indeed and acceptable, but for those whom the bonds of church office do not hold. For he who does not flee the disasters of war, when he could escape, so as not to desert the ministry of Christ, without which men cannot become or live as Christians, finds a greater fruit of love than he who flees not for the brothers' sake but for his own, and, being caught, does not deny Christ and undergoes martyrdom.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.4 (CSEL 57:486–487; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-4).

## Letter 228.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-5
- Source: CSEL 57:487–488
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Honoratus's fear of massacre and torture: the clergy may leave only when their people have left, and bishops who deserted their flocks in Spain did wrong.

### Latin text

Quid est ergo, quod in epistula tua priore posuisti? dicis enim: Si in ecclesiis persistendum est, quid simus nobis uel populo profuturi, non uideo, nisi ut ante oculos nostros uiri cadant, feminae constuprentur, incendantur ecclesiae. nos ipsi tormentis deficiamus, cum de nobis quaeritur, quod non habemus. potens est quidem deus audire preces familiae suae et haec, quae formidantur, auertere; nec ideo tamen propter ista, quae incerta sunt, debet esse nostri officii certa desertio, sine quo est plebi certa pernicies non in rebus uitae huius sed alterius incomparabiliter diligentius sollicitiusque curandae. nam si certa essent ista mala, quae timentur ne in locis, in quibus sumus. forte contingant, prius inde fugerent omnes, propter quos ibi manendum est, et nos a manendi necessitate liberos redderent; non enim quisquam est. qui dicat ministros manere oportere, ubi iam non fuerint, quibus necesse sit ministrare. ita quidam sancti episcopi de Hispania profugerunt prius plebibus partim fuga lapsis partim peremptis partim obsidione consumptis partim captiuitate dispersis; sed multo plures illic manentibus, propter quos manerent, sub eorundem periculorum densitate manserunt. et si aliqui deseruerunt plebes suas, hoc est, quod dicimus fieri non debere; neque enim tales docti auctoritate diuina, sed humano uel errore decepti uel timore sunt uicti.

### English translation (Claude)

What, then, of what you put in your earlier letter? For you say: “If we are to remain in the churches, I do not see what good we will do ourselves or the people, except that before our eyes men will fall, women be violated, churches be burned, and we ourselves die under torture when what we do not have is demanded of us.” God is indeed able to hear the prayers of his household and to avert the things that are feared; and yet, because of these things, which are uncertain, there ought not to be a certain desertion of our office, without which there is certain ruin for the people, not in the affairs of this life but of the other, which must be cared for incomparably more diligently and anxiously. For if these evils that are feared might happen in the places where we are were certain, all those for whose sake we must remain there would flee from there first and set us free from the need to remain; for no one says that ministers must remain where there is no longer anyone who needs to be ministered to. So some holy bishops fled from Spain, after their people had partly slipped away in flight, partly been killed, partly been consumed by siege, and partly been scattered in captivity; but many more remained under the thick of the same dangers, because those for whose sake they should remain were remaining there. And if some have deserted their people, this is what we say ought not to be done; for such men were not taught by divine authority, but were either deceived by human error or overcome by fear.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.5 (CSEL 57:487–488; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-5).

## Letter 228.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-6
- Source: CSEL 57:488–489
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reconciles the command to flee with the condemnation of the hireling: ministers may flee only if no people remain or others can minister, as with Paul and Athanasius.

### Latin text

Cur enim sibi putant indifferenter obtemperandum esse praecepto, ubi legunt de ciuitate in ciuitatem esse fugiendum, et mercennarium non exhorrent. qui uidet lupum uenientem et fugit, quoniam non est ei cura de ouibus? cur non istas duas dominicas uerasque sententias unam scilicet, ubi fuga sinitur aut iubetur, alteram, ubi arguitur atque culpatur, sic intellegere student, ut inter se reperiantur non esse contrariae, sicut non sunt? et hoc quo modo reperitur, nisi adtendatur. quod iam superius disputaui, tunc de locis, in quibus sumus, premente persecutione fugiendum esse Christi ministris, quando ibi aut plebs Christi non fuerit. cui ministretur, aut potest impleri per alios necessarium ministerium, quibus eadem non est causa fugiendi, sicut in sporta submissus. quod supra memoraui, fugit apostolus, cum a persecutore ipse proprie quaereretur, aliis utique necessitatem similem non habentibus, a quibus illic ministerium absit ut desereretur ecclesiae, sicut fugit sanctus Athanasius, Alexandrinus episcopus, cum eum specialiter adprehendere Constantius cuperet imperator, nequaquam a ceteris ministris deserta plebe catholica, quae in Alexandria commanebat? cum autem plebs manet et ministri fugiunt ministeriumque subtrahitur, quid erit, nisi mercennariorum illa fuga damnabilis, quibus non est cura de ouibus? ueniet enim lupus. non homo sed diabolus, qui plerumque fideles apostatas esse persuasit, quibus cotidianum ministerium dominici corporis defuit, et peribit infirmus in tua non scientia sed ignorantia frater, propter quem Christus mortuus est.

### English translation (Claude)

For why do they think they must obey indiscriminately the command where they read that one should flee from city to city, and yet do not shudder at the hireling who sees the wolf coming and flees, because he has no care for the sheep? Why do they not try to understand these two true sayings of the Lord, the one where flight is permitted or commanded and the other where it is censured and blamed, so that they may be found not to be contrary to each other, as they are not? And how is this found unless attention is paid to what I have already argued above: that Christ's ministers should flee from the places where they are under the pressure of persecution when either there is no people of Christ there to be ministered to, or the necessary ministry can be fulfilled by others who do not have the same reason to flee? So the apostle fled, let down in a basket, as I mentioned above, when he himself was sought in particular by the persecutor, while others did not have the same necessity, by whom, far be it, the ministry of the church there was not deserted. So the holy Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, fled when the emperor Constantius wished to seize him in particular, while the Catholic people that remained in Alexandria was in no way deserted by the other ministers. But when the people remain and the ministers flee and the ministry is withdrawn, what is that but the damnable flight of hirelings, who have no care for the sheep? For the wolf will come, not a man but the devil, who has often persuaded believers to become apostates when the daily ministry of the Lord's body was lacking to them; and through your, not knowledge, but ignorance the weak brother will perish, for whom Christ died.

### Scripture references

- Matt 10:23: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:12–13: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 11:33: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:11: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 10:23; John 10:12–13; 2 Cor 11:33; 1 Cor 8:11 (adapted: “not knowledge but ignorance”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.6 (CSEL 57:488–489; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-6).

## Letter 228.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-7
- Source: CSEL 57:489–490
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges fearful clergy to fear spiritual ruin of their flocks more than bodily harm, adding that rape without consent does not violate chastity.

### Latin text

Quod autem ad eos adtinet, qui in hac re non falluntur errore, sed formidine superantur, quare non potius contra suum timorem domino miserante atque adiuuante fortiter dimicant, ne mala sine comparatione grauiora, quae multo amplius sunt tremenda, contingant? fit hoc, ubi dei caritas flagrat. non mundi cupiditas fumat. caritas enim dicit: Quis infirmatur et non ego infirmor? quis scandalizatur et non ego uror? sed caritas ex deo est oremus ergo, ut ab illo detur, a quo iubetur. et per hanc magis timeamus, ne oues Christi spiritalis nequitiae gladio in corde, quam ne ferro in corpore trucidentur. ubi quandocumque quocumque mortis genere morituri sunt; magis timeamus, ne sensu interiore corrupto pereat castitas fidei, quam ne feminae uiolenter constuprentur in carne, qua uiolentia non uiolatur pudicitia, si mente seruatur, quoniam nec in carne uiolatur, quando uoluntas patientis sua turpiter carne non utitur, sed sine consensione tolerat, quod alius operatur; magis timeamus, ne lapides uiui extinguantur deserentibus nobis, quam ne lapides et ligna terrenorum aedificiorum incendantur praesentibus nobis; magis timeamus, ne membra corporis Christi destituta spiritali uictu necentur, quam ne membra corporis nostri oppressa hostili impetu torqueantur, non quia ista non sunt uitanda, cum possunt, sed quia potius ferenda sunt, quando uitari sine impietate non possunt, nisi forte quisquam contenderit non esse ministrum impium, qui tunc subtrahit ministerium pietati necessarium, quando magis est necessarium.

### English translation (Claude)

As for those who in this matter are not misled by error but overcome by fear, why do they not rather fight bravely against their fear, with the Lord's mercy and help, so that evils incomparably heavier, which are far more to be dreaded, may not befall? This happens where the love of God burns, not where the desire of the world smokes. For love says: “Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?” But love is from God. Let us pray, then, that it may be given by him by whom it is commanded. And through it let us fear more that Christ's sheep be slain in the heart by the sword of spiritual wickedness than by steel in the body, where, at some time and by some kind of death, they are going to die anyway. Let us fear more that the chastity of faith perish through the corruption of the inner sense than that women be violently defiled in the flesh; for by such violence modesty is not violated if it is kept in the mind, since it is not violated even in the flesh when the will of the one who suffers does not make shameful use of her own flesh but endures without consent what another does. Let us fear more that living stones be extinguished when we desert them than that the stones and timbers of earthly buildings be burned while we are present. Let us fear more that the members of Christ's body be killed when deprived of spiritual food than that the members of our body be tortured when overwhelmed by the enemy's attack: not because these things should not be avoided when they can be, but because they should rather be borne when they cannot be avoided without impiety; unless perhaps someone will contend that a minister is not impious who withdraws the ministry necessary for godliness at the very time when it is most necessary.

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 11:29: quotation, high confidence
- 1 John 4:7: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 2:5: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 2 Cor 11:29. Allusions: 1 John 4:7; 1 Pet 2:5 (living stones). On violence without consent cf. City of God 1.16–18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.7 (CSEL 57:489–490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-7).

## Letter 228.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-8
- Source: CSEL 57:490–491
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes the crowds seeking baptism, reconciliation and communion in a crisis, and the eternal loss if the clergy have fled.

### Latin text

An non cogitamus, cum ad istorum periculorum peruenitur extrema nec est potestas ulla fugiendi, quantus in ecclesia fieri soleat ab utroque sexu atque ab omni aetate concursus aliis baptismum flagitantibus aliis reconciliationem aliis etiam paenitentiae ipsius actionem omnibus consolationem et sacramentorum confectionem et erogationem? ubi si ministri desint, quantum exitium sequatur eos, qui de isto saeculo uel non regenerati exeunt uel ligati? quantus est etiam luctus fidelium suorum. qui eos secum in uitae aeternae requiem non habebunt! quantus denique gemitus omnium et quorundam quanta blasphemia de absentia ministeriorum et ministrorum! uide, quid faciat malorum temporalium timor et quanta in eo sit adquisitio malorum aeternorum. si autem ministri adsint. pro uiribus, quas eis dominus subministrat, omnibus subuenitur: alii baptizantur, alii reconciliantur, nulli dominici corporis communione fraudantur, omnes consolantur, aedificantur, exhortantur, ut deum rogent, qui potens est omnia, quae timentur, auertere, parati ad utrumque, ut, si non potest ab eis calix iste transire, fiat uoluntas eius, qui mali aliquid non potest uelle.

### English translation (Claude)

Do we not consider, when the extremity of these dangers is reached and there is no possibility of flight, how great a crowd of both sexes and every age usually gathers in the church, some demanding baptism, others reconciliation, others even the performance of penance itself, all of them consolation and the celebration and distribution of the sacraments? If ministers are lacking there, what destruction follows for those who leave this world either unregenerate or bound! How great too is the grief of their faithful relatives, who will not have them with them in the rest of eternal life! How great, finally, the groaning of all, and how great the blasphemy of some, at the absence of ministries and ministers! See what the fear of temporal evils does, and how much it gains of eternal evils. But if ministers are present, all are helped according to the strength the Lord supplies them: some are baptized, others reconciled, none is cheated of the communion of the Lord's body, all are consoled, built up and exhorted to ask God, who is able to avert all that is feared, ready for either outcome, so that, if this cup cannot pass from them, the will may be done of him who cannot will anything evil.

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:42: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Bound”: still under penitential discipline, unreconciled. Allusion: Matt 26:39, 42.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.8 (CSEL 57:490–491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-8).

## Letter 228.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-9
- Source: CSEL 57:491–492
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the presence of ministers in danger benefits the people, citing Paul's example of seeking others' good.

### Latin text

Certe iam uides, quod te scripseras non uidere, quantum boni consequantur populi Christiani, si in praesentibus malis non eis desit praesentia ministrorum Christi. quorum uides etiam quantum obsit absentia, dum sua quaerunt, non quae Iesu Christi. nec habent illam, de qua dictum est: Non quaerit, quae sua sunt, nec imitantur eum, qui dixit: Non quaerens, quod mihi utile est, sed quod multis, ut salui fiant. qui etiam persecutoris principis illius insidias non fugisset. nisi se aliis. quibus necessarius erat, seruare uoluisset, propter quod ait: Compellor autem ex duobus concupiscentiam habens dissolui et esse cum Christo, multo magis optimum; manere in carne necessarium propter uos.

### English translation (Claude)

Surely you now see what you had written that you did not see: how much good the Christian people gain if in present evils the presence of Christ's ministers is not lacking to them. You see too how much their absence harms, while they seek their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ, and do not have that love of which it was said, “It does not seek its own,” nor imitate him who said, “Not seeking what is profitable to me, but to many, that they may be saved.” He would not even have fled the plots of that persecuting ruler had he not wished to preserve himself for others who needed him; that is why he says: “I am hard pressed between the two, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better; but to remain in the flesh is necessary for your sake.”

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 13:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:33: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 1:23–24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Phil 2:21; 1 Cor 13:5; 1 Cor 10:33; Phil 1:23–24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.9 (CSEL 57:491–492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-9).

## Letter 228.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-10
- Source: CSEL 57:492–493
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine allows a minister to flee to preserve himself for the Church only when others remain, as Athanasius did and as David's men asked of him.

### Latin text

Hic forte quis dicat ideo debere dei ministros fugere talibus imminentibus malis, ut se pro utilitate ecclesiae temporibus tranquillioribus seruent. recte hoc fit a quibusdam. quando non desunt alii, per quos suppleatur ecclesiasticum ministerium, ne ab omnibus deseratur, quod fecisse Athanasium supra diximus; nam quantum necessarium fuerit ecclesiae quantumque profuerit, quod uir ille mansit in carne, catholica fides nouit, quae aduersus Arrianos haereticos ore illius et amore defensa est. sed quando est commune periculum magisque timendum est, ne quisquam id facere credatur non consulendi uoluntate sed timore moriendi magisque fugiendi obsit exemplo, quam uiuendi prosit officio. nulla ratione faciendum est. denique sanctus Dauid, ne se committeret periculis proeliorum et fortassis extingueretur, sicut ibi dictum est, lucerna Israhel, a suis hoc petentibus sumpsit, non ipse praesumpsit; alioquin multos imitatores fecisset ignauiae, qui eum crederent hoc fecisse non consideratione utilitatis aliorum sed suae perturbatione formidinis.

### English translation (Claude)

Here someone may perhaps say that God's ministers ought to flee when such evils threaten, so as to preserve themselves for the benefit of the Church in calmer times. Some do this rightly, when there are others through whom the church's ministry may be supplied, so that it is not deserted by all; this, as we said above, is what Athanasius did. For how necessary it was to the Church, and how much it profited, that that man remained in the flesh, the Catholic faith knows, which was defended against the Arian heretics by his mouth and love. But when the danger is common, and it is more to be feared that someone may be thought to do this not from the wish to provide but from the fear of dying, and that he may do more harm by the example of flight than good by the duty of living, it must by no means be done. Indeed holy David, so as not to commit himself to the dangers of battle and perhaps be extinguished, as it says there, as the lamp of Israel, accepted this from his men who asked it; he did not presume it himself. Otherwise he would have made many imitators of cowardice, who would have believed he did it not out of regard for the good of others but out of the agitation of his own fear.

### Scripture references

- 2 Sam 21:17: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 2 Sam 21:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.10 (CSEL 57:492–493; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-10).

## Letter 228.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-11
- Source: CSEL 57:493–494
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine considers the case where only clergy are hunted, and compares the Church to a ship whose crew and helmsman must not desert it in common danger.

### Latin text

Occurrit aliquanto alia quaestio, quam contemnere non debemus. si enim haec utilitas neglegenda non est, ut aliqui ministri propterea fugiant imminente aliqua uastitate, ut seruentur, qui ministrent eis, quos post illam cladem residuos potuerint inuenire, quid fiet, ubi omnes uidentur interituri. nisi aliqui fugiant? quid? si enim hactenus saeuiat illa pernicies, ut solos ministros ecclesiae persequatur, quid dicam? an relinquenda est a ministris fugientibus ecclesia, ne a morientibus miserabilius relinquatur? sed si laici non quaeruntur ad mortem, possunt occultare quoquo modo episcopos et clericos suos, sicut ille adiuuerit, in cuius potestate sunt omnia, qui potest et non fugientem per mirabilem conseruare potentiam. sed ideo quaerimus, quid nos facere debeamus. ne in omnibus expectando diuina miracula temptare dominum iudicemur. non quidem talis est ista tempestas, quando laicorum et clericorum est commune periculum, sicut in naui una commune periculum est mercatorum atque nautarum. uerum absit, ut tanti pendenda sit haec nauis nostra, ut debeant eam nautae et maxime gubernator periclitantem deserere, etiam si in scapham transiliendo uel etiam natando possit effugere. quibus enim metuimus, ne nostra desertione pereant, non temporalem mortem, quae quandoque uentura est, sed aeternam, quae potest, si non caueatur, uenire et potest, si caueatur, etiam non uenire, metuimus. in communi autem periculo uitae huius cur existimamus, ubicumque fuerit hostilis incursus, omnes clericos et non etiam omnes laicos esse morituros, ut simul finiant hanc uitam, cui sunt clerici necessarii? aut cur non speremus sicut aliquos laicos sic etiam clericos remansuros, a quibus eis necessarium ministerium ualeat exhiberi?

### English translation (Claude)

Another question arises, somewhat different, which we must not disregard. If this benefit is not to be neglected, that some ministers flee when some devastation threatens so that there may be survivors to minister to those they may find left after the disaster, what will happen where all seem likely to perish unless some flee? What if that destruction rages so far as to pursue only the ministers of the Church? What shall I say? Is the church to be left by ministers fleeing, so that it may not be left more miserably by them dying? But if laymen are not sought out for death, they can hide their bishops and clergy in some way, as he helps in whose power are all things, who can preserve even one who does not flee by his wonderful power. But we ask what we ought to do, so that we may not be judged to tempt the Lord by expecting divine miracles in everything. This storm, indeed, is not of that kind, since the danger is common to laity and clergy, as on one ship the danger is common to merchants and sailors. But far be it that this ship of ours should be valued so little that the sailors, and above all the helmsman, ought to desert it in danger, even if they could escape by leaping into a boat or even by swimming. For in the case of those we fear may perish by our desertion, it is not temporal death we fear, which will come some time, but eternal death, which may come if not guarded against, and, if guarded against, may not come. But in the common danger of this life, why do we think that wherever there is an enemy invasion all the clergy will die and not all the laity too, so that those for whose life the clergy are necessary will end this life at the same time? Or why should we not hope that some clergy will remain, as some laity will, by whom the necessary ministry can be provided for them?

### Scripture references

- Matt 4:7: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Matt 4:7 (tempting the Lord).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.11 (CSEL 57:493–494; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-11).

## Letter 228.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-12
- Source: CSEL 57:494–495
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine suggests that if clergy dispute who should stay and who flee, the matter be decided by lot, and warns against anyone judging himself too valuable to stay.

### Latin text

Quamquam o si inter dei ministros inde sit disceptatio, qui eorum maneant, ne fuga omnium, et qui eorum fugiant, ne morte omnium deseratur ecclesia! tale quippe certamen erit inter eos, ubi utrique ferueant caritate et utrique placeant caritati. quae disceptatio si aliter non potuerit terminari, quantum mihi uidetur, qui maneant et qui fugiant, sorte legendi sunt. qui enim dixerint se potius fugere debere, aut timidi uidebuntur, quia imminens malum sustinere noluerunt, aut adrogantes, quia se magis, qui seruandi essent, necessarios ecclesiae iudicarunt. deinde fortassis hi, qui meliores sunt, eligant pro fratribus animas ponere et hi seruabuntur fugiendo, quorum est minus utilis uita, quia minor consulendi et gubernandi peritia; qui tamen, si pie sapiunt, contradicent eis, quos uident et uiuere potius oportere et magis mori malle quam fugere. ideo, sicut scriptum est, contradictiones sedat sortitio et inter potentes definit; melius enim deus in huiusce modi ambagibus quam homines iudicat, siue dignetur ad passionis fructum uocare meliores et parcere infirmis siue istos facere ad mala perferenda fortiores et huic uitae subtrahere, quorum non potest dei ecclesiae tantum quantum illorum uita prodesse. res quidem fiet minus usitata, si fiat ista sortitio; sed si facta fuerit, quis eam reprehendere audebit? quis non eam nisi inperitus aut inuidus congrua praedicatione laudabit? quod si non placet facere, cuius facti non occurrit exemplum, nullius fuga faciat, ut ecclesiae ministerium maxime in tantis periculis necessarium ac debitum desit. nemo accipiat personam suam, ut, si aliqua gratia uidetur excellere, ideo se dicat uita et ob hoc fuga esse digniorem. quisquis enim hoc putat, nimium sibi placet; quisquis autem etiam hoc dicit. omnibus displicet.

### English translation (Claude)

And yet, O that there might be a dispute among God's ministers over which of them should stay, so that the church is not deserted by the flight of all, and which should flee, so that it is not deserted by the death of all! Such a contest will take place among them where both sides burn with love and both please love. If this dispute cannot be ended otherwise, it seems to me that those who stay and those who flee should be chosen by lot. For those who say that they ought rather to flee will seem either timid, because they were unwilling to bear the threatening evil, or arrogant, because they judged themselves more necessary to the Church and so more to be preserved. Then perhaps the better men will choose to lay down their lives for the brothers, and those will be preserved by flight whose life is less useful because they have less skill in counseling and governing; yet these, if they are wise in a godly way, will oppose those whom they see both ought rather to live and prefer to die rather than flee. Therefore, as it is written, “the lot puts an end to disputes and decides between the powerful”; for God judges better than men in perplexities of this kind, whether he deigns to call the better to the fruit of suffering and to spare the weak, or to make the latter stronger to endure evils and to take from this life those whose life cannot profit God's Church as much as the life of the others. It will indeed be an unusual thing if this casting of lots is done; but if it is done, who will dare to find fault with it? Who, except the ignorant or the envious, will not praise it as it deserves? But if it is not thought good to do what has no example to recall, let no one's flight cause the ministry of the Church, necessary and owed above all in such dangers, to be lacking. Let no one favor his own person, so as to say that, because he seems to excel in some grace, he is more worthy of life and therefore of flight. For whoever thinks this is too pleased with himself, and whoever also says it displeases everyone.

### Scripture references

- Prov 18:18: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Prov 18:18.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.12 (CSEL 57:494–495; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-12).

## Letter 228.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-13
- Source: CSEL 57:495–496
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine advises clergy to tell their people they stay for the people's sake, and to leave only if the people leave.

### Latin text

Sunt sane. qui arbitrantur episcopos et clericos non fugientes in talibus periculis sed manentes facere, ut plebes decipiantur. cum ideo non fugiunt, quia manere suos praepositos cernunt. sed facile est hanc responsionem uel inuidiam declinare adloquendo easdem plebes atque dicendo: Non uos decipiat, quod de loco isto non fugimus; non enim propter nos sed propter uos potius hic manemus, ne uobis non ministremus, quicquid saluti uestrae, quae in Christo est, nouimus necessarium. si ergo fugere uolueritis, et nos ab istis, quibus tenemur, uinculis soluistis. quod tunc puto esse dicendum, quando uere uidetur utile esse ad loca tutiora migrare. quo audito si uel omnes uel aliqui dixerint: In illius potestate sumus. cuius iram nullus, quocumque uadit, euadit, cuius misericordiam. ubicumque sit, potest inuenire, qui nusquam uult ire siue certis necessitatibus impeditus siue laborare nolens ad incerta suffugia et non ad finienda sed ad mutanda pericula, procul dubio isti deserendi non sunt ministerio Christiano. si autem hoc audito abire maluerint, nec illis manendum, qui propter illos manebant, quia ibi iam non sunt, propter quos manere adhuc debeant.

### English translation (Claude)

There are, to be sure, those who think that bishops and clergy who do not flee in such dangers but remain cause the people to be deceived, since the people do not flee because they see their leaders remaining. But it is easy to avoid this reply or reproach by addressing these same people and saying: “Do not be deceived because we do not flee from this place; for we remain here not for our own sake but rather for yours, so as not to fail to minister to you whatever we know is necessary for your salvation, which is in Christ. If, then, you wish to flee, you also free us from these bonds by which we are held.” I think this should be said when it truly seems useful to move to safer places. If, on hearing this, all or some say, “We are in the power of him whose anger no one escapes wherever he goes, and whose mercy one can find wherever he is,” and do not wish to go anywhere, whether hindered by definite necessities or unwilling to toil toward uncertain refuges, not to end their dangers but to exchange them, without doubt they must not be deprived of the Christian ministry. But if, on hearing this, they prefer to leave, those who were remaining for their sake need not remain either, because there are no longer any there for whose sake they should still remain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.13 (CSEL 57:495–496; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-13).

## Letter 228.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-14
- Source: CSEL 57:496–497
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that flight is permitted only if the flock is not left without ministry, and commends prayer and the example of those who stayed.

### Latin text

Quicumque igitur isto modo fugit, ut ecclesiae necessarium ministerium illo fugiente non desit, facit, quod dominus praecepit siue permisit. qui autem sic fugit, ut gregi Christi ea, quibus spiritaliter uiuit, alimenta subtrahantur, mercennarius ille est. qui uidet lupum uenientem et fugit, quoniam non est ei cura de ouibus. haec tibi. quia me consuluisti, frater dilectissime, qua existimaui ueritate et certa caritate, rescripsi; sed ne meliorem, si inueneris, sequaris sententiam, non praescripsi. melius tamen, quod in his periculis faciamus, inuenire non possumus quam orationes ad dominum deum nostrum, ut misereatur nostri. quod ipsum, ut scilicet ecclesias non desererent, dei dono nonnulli prudentes et sancti uiri et uelle et facere meruerunt et inter dentes obtrectantium a sui propositi intentione minime defecerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Whoever, then, flees in such a way that the necessary ministry of the Church is not lacking because of his flight does what the Lord commanded or permitted. But whoever flees in such a way that the flock of Christ is deprived of the nourishment by which it lives spiritually is that hireling who sees the wolf coming and flees, because he has no care for the sheep. I have written this back to you, dearest brother, since you consulted me, with what I judged to be truth and with sure love; but I have not prescribed that you should not follow a better opinion, if you find one. Still, we can find nothing better to do in these dangers than prayers to the Lord our God that he may have mercy on us. And by God's gift some prudent and holy men have deserved both to will and to do this very thing, namely not to desert their churches, and amid the teeth of detractors have in no way failed in the purpose they set themselves.

### Scripture references

- John 10:12–13: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: John 10:12–13.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 228.14 (CSEL 57:496–497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-228-14).

## Letter 229.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-229-1
- Source: CSEL 57:497
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine greets Darius, the imperial envoy, whom he knows through the bishops Urbanus and Novatus, as a peacemaker.

### Latin text

A sanctis fratribus et coepiscopis meis Urbano et Nouato, qualis sis uir et quantus, accepi, quorum alteri apud Carthaginem in Hilarensi oppido et modo in Siccensi. alteri autem apud Sitifim te nosse prouenit. per hos ergo factum est, ut nec ego te habere incognitum possem. neque enim, quia me infirmitas corporis et geminum frigus, id est hiemis et aetatis. non sinit coram tecum conloqui, ideo non te uidi: nam iste mihi etiam praesens, quando ad me uenire dignatus est. ille autem litteris non faciem tuae carnis sed cordis ostendit, ut tanto suauius quanto interius te uiderem. hanc faciem tuam etiam in sancto euangelio et nos et tu ipse propitio deo tamquam in speculo laetissimus inspicis, ubi scriptum est a ueritate dicente: Beati pacifici, quoniam filii dei uocabuntur.

### English translation (Claude)

I have learned what kind of man you are, and how great, from my holy brothers and fellow bishops Urbanus and Novatus, one of whom came to know you near Carthage in the town of Hilara and now at Sicca, and the other at Sitifis. Through them it has come about that I too could not have you unknown to me. For although bodily weakness and a double cold, that is, of winter and of age, do not allow me to converse with you face to face, I have not therefore not seen you: for one of them, when he deigned to come to me in person, and the other by letter, showed me not the face of your flesh but of your heart, so that I saw you the more pleasantly the more inwardly. This face of yours we too, and you yourself, by God's favor, look upon with great joy as in a mirror in the holy gospel, where it is written by the Truth who says: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:9: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Darius, an official sent by the court to negotiate peace with Boniface (429). Quotation: Matt 5:9.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 229.1 (CSEL 57:497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-229-1).

## Letter 229.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-229-2
- Source: CSEL 57:497–499
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine praises Darius for ending war by words rather than the sword, asks for a reply, and greets the pledge of peace he has obtained.

### Latin text

Magni quidem sunt et habent gloriam suam non solum fortissimi sed etiam, quod uerioris origo laudis, fidelissimi bellatores et quorum laboribus atque periculis dei protegentis atque opitulantis auxilio hostis indomitus uincitur, quies rei publicae pacatisque prouinciis comparatur; sed maioris est gloriae ipsa bella uerbo occidere quam homines ferro et adquirere uel obtinere pacem pace non bello. nam et hi, qui pugnant, si boni sunt, procul dubio pacem sed tamen per sanguinem quaerunt; tu autem, ne cuiusquam sanguis quaereretur, es missus. est itaque aliis illa necessitas, tibi ista felicitas. proinde, domine merito inlustris et magnificentissime atque in Christo carissime fili, gaude isto tuo tam magno et uero bono et fruere in deo, unde sumpsisti, ut talis esses et talia gerenda susciperes. confirmet deus, quod per te operatus est nobis. accipe hanc salutationem nostram et tuam dignare rependere. sicut mihi scripsit frater Nouatus, egit, ut me excellentia et eruditio tua etiam in meis opusculis nosset. si ergo legisti, quae dedit. ego quoque innotui interioribus tuis sensibus non multum displicens, quantum existimo, si propensiore caritate quam seueritate legisti. non est multum sed multum gratum, si pro litteris nostris et his et illis unam nobis epistulam reddas. saluto etiam pignus pacis, quod domino deo nostro adiuuante feliciter accepisti, ea dilectione, qua debeo.

### English translation (Claude)

Great indeed are warriors, and they have their glory, not only the bravest but also, which is the source of truer praise, the most faithful ones, by whose labors and dangers, with the help of God who protects and aids, an untamed enemy is conquered and quiet is secured for the state and the provinces pacified. But it is greater glory to slay wars themselves with a word than men with steel, and to gain or keep peace by peace, not by war. For those who fight, if they are good, without doubt seek peace, but through blood; you, however, were sent so that no one's blood should be sought. For others, then, there is that necessity; for you this happiness. Therefore, my lord justly illustrious and most magnificent, and my dearest son in Christ, rejoice in this great and true good of yours, and enjoy it in God, from whom you received it that you should be such a man and should undertake such tasks. May God confirm what he has wrought for us through you. Receive this greeting of ours and deign to repay it with yours. As brother Novatus wrote to me, he has arranged that Your Excellency and learning should know me also through my writings. If, then, you have read what he gave you, I too have become known to your inner mind, and, I think, not much to your displeasure, if you read with more inclined love than severity. It is not much, but very welcome, if for our letters, both this and those, you return us one letter. I also greet the pledge of peace that, by the help of the Lord our God, you have happily received, with the love I owe.

### Scripture references

- Ps 68:28 (67:29 LXX): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Ps 68:28 (LXX 67:29). “The pledge of peace”: probably a hostage or treaty pledge; uncertain. Augustine distinguishes the necessity of just war from the happiness of peacemaking.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 229.2 (CSEL 57:497–499; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-229-2).

## Letter 230.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-1
- Source: CSEL 57:499
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius replies to Augustine, wishing he could have met him and heard his voice in person.

### Latin text

Utinam, domine sancte pater, ut meum nomen ad aures tuas coepiscoporum, ut ais, tuorum Urbani et Nouati benigna erga me gratia faciente perlatum est, ita memet ipsum deus omnium deus tuus manibus tuis atque oculis obtulisset, non quo maiorem aut forsitan talem, qualem tantorum uirorum apud te beniuolus sermo et litterarum commendatio fecerat. tui me probauisset melior lima iudicii, sed ut caelestis sapientiae tuae uerissimos atque inmortales fructus ore tuo potius ueluti cuiusdam purae aquae dulcedinem ab ipso fontis praesenti ac perpetuo liquore sumpsissem! o me non modo ter aut quater, ut apud nescio quem est, sed miliens et omni numero plus beatum, si mihi datum esset praesenti intueri tuos uere sidereos uultus uocemque diuinam ac diuina canentem non solum mentis fructu sed etiam cum aurium iucunditate sumere et haurire licuisset! putarem profecto me quasdam inmortalitatis leges non modo de caelo sed in ipso constitutum caelo suscipere et quasdam dei uoces non longe de templo sed propter ipsum dei adstantem tribunal audire.

### English translation (Claude)

Would, holy lord father, that as my name has reached your ears through the kind favor toward me of your fellow bishops, as you say, Urbanus and Novatus, so God, the God of all and your God, had presented me myself to your hands and eyes: not that the better file of your judgment might have proved me greater, or perhaps such as the kindly words of such great men and the recommendation of their letters had made me in your eyes, but that I might have taken the truest and immortal fruits of your heavenly wisdom rather from your mouth, like the sweetness of pure water from the present and perpetual stream of the spring itself! O me, not only three or four times, as some poet says, but a thousand times and beyond all number blessed, if it had been given me to look upon your truly starry face in person, and to take in and drink your divine voice, singing divine things, not only with the fruit of the mind but with the delight of the ears! I would surely have thought that I was receiving certain laws of immortality, not merely from heaven but set in heaven itself, and hearing certain voices of God, not far off from the temple but standing beside God's very tribunal.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Virgil, Aen. 1.94 (Virgil): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Letter of Darius to Augustine (429). “Three or four times”: Virgil, Aen. 1.94.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.1 (CSEL 57:499; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-1).

## Letter 230.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-2
- Source: CSEL 57:499–500
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius rejoices in being commended to Augustine by two bishops and in his letter, and prays to live up to Augustine's praise.

### Latin text

Haec ut mihi contingerent, propter ardentissimum tui desiderium forsitan merebar, propter conscientiam, fateor. non merebar. sed absens quoque cepi fructus cupiditatis bonae non minimos et est mihi de secundis bonis bonorum summa perfectio. commendatus sum ei, cui uellem, ore sanctorum et duorum locis ac regionibus inter se distantium sacerdotum: unius, quod iam dixi, de me beniuolus sermo et praesens. ut ita dicam. testimonium. alterius eiusdem sensus parilisque sententiae uolantia ad te scripta concurrunt. coronam mihi apud te quandam tanti ac tales uiri non uiridantium florum germine sed gloriosae uocis testimonio tamquam quibusdam perpetuitatis gemmulis texerunt. quod deum summum oro pro te et tuam intercessionem, sancte pater, expostulo, ut. quoniam minime mihi testimonii tanti sum conscius. esse mihi tali uel quandoque proueniat. iam illa nonne omnia absentiae meae detrimenta uicerunt. quod ipse nos conloqui, quod scribere, quod salutare dignaris et absentem me absente esse non pateris? dolebam me σωτηρι meo post deum σωτηρα non uisum; at tamen non carnis faciem — sic enim ais — sed, quod plus est, cordis adtendis eoque uisus sum tibi esse iucundior, quo penitus inspexisti. faxit deus, ut iudicio, mi pater, tuo respondeam nec sim apud meam conscientiam reus, cum talem me, qualem tibi ipse formasti, interius ego non uideam.

### English translation (Claude)

That these things should happen to me I perhaps deserved because of my most ardent longing for you; because of my conscience, I confess, I did not deserve it. But even in absence I have gained not the least fruits of good desire, and for me the summit of goods is perfected from the second-best goods. I have been commended to the one I wished by the mouth of saints and of two bishops far apart in place and region: on the one side his kindly words about me and, so to speak, his present testimony; on the other, the writings of the second, of the same mind and equal judgment, flying to you, concur. Such great men have woven for me a kind of crown in your sight, not with the buds of green flowers but with the testimony of a glorious voice, as with gems of permanence. For this I pray the most high God for you, and I ask your intercession, holy father, that, since I am not at all conscious of deserving such testimony, it may some day come about that I am such. And have not these things overcome all the losses of my absence, that you yourself deign to converse with us, to write, to greet, and do not let me be absent though absent? I grieved that I had not seen, next after God, the savior of my savior; but yet you look not at the face of the flesh, as you say, but, what is more, of the heart, and so I appeared more pleasing to you the more inwardly you looked. God grant, my father, that I may answer to your judgment and not be guilty before my conscience, if I do not inwardly see myself as you have formed me for yourself.

### Translation notes

- “The savior of my savior” renders the Greek σωτῆρι … σωτῆρα in the Latin text; the sense of the wordplay is uncertain (perhaps “the one who saves me, next to God my Savior”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.2 (CSEL 57:499–500; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-2).

## Letter 230.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-3
- Source: CSEL 57:500–501
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius says he has at least postponed war, hopes for lasting peace through Augustine's blessing, and asks his prayers for the empire.

### Latin text

Bella me in eadem diuina ac caelesti epistula tua ex more tibi, quod laudare uelles. eloquentia ministrante, bella me. inquam, uerbo ais occidere. hic uero, mi sancte pater. animus mihi tamquam e quibusdam cogitationum tenebris, quasi ueras sui laudes recognouisset, emersit. ut enim totum breuiter ac simpliciter beatitudini tuae confitear, si non extinximus bella. certe distulimus et deo opitulante omnium principe, quae iam usque ad quendam calamitatum apicem increuerant mala, sopita sunt. spero tamen ab eo, a quo, quicquid bonum est. totum sperare debemus, quin etiam de ipsius epistulae tuae auguror benedictione tam larga, tam certa, ut haec ipsa bellorum, quam dixi. dilatio pacis habeat teneatque perennem ac perpetuam firmitatem. dixisti enim et perpetua dei lege fixisti. ut gaudeam isto, ut tu ais, meo tam magno et uere bono et fruar in deo, unde sumpsisse me dicis, ut et talis essem et talia gerenda susciperem. conectis deinde: Confirmet, inquis, deus, quod per me operatus est nobis. o uota non modo pro me sed pro salute omnium nuncupata! nec enim mea ista gloria separari a salute omnium potest et, ut ego orationibus tuis felix esse possim, una mecum omnes felices esse necesse est. diu. pater, pro Romano imperio, pro Romana re publica, pro his etiam, quos dignos esse tibi occurrerit, talia uota sumas ac nuncupes, quandoque te serus in caelum tollis. tradas posteris mandesque sequentibus.

### English translation (Claude)

In that same divine and heavenly letter of yours, with your usual eloquence serving what you wished to praise, you say that I slay wars, slay them, I say, with a word. Here indeed, my holy father, my mind emerged as if from certain darkness of thoughts, as though it recognized its true praises. For, to confess everything to Your Blessedness briefly and simply, if we have not extinguished wars, we have certainly postponed them, and with the help of God, the ruler of all, the evils that had grown to a kind of peak of calamity have been laid to rest. Yet I hope from him from whom we must hope for every good thing, and indeed I augur from the blessing of your letter itself, so ample, so sure, that this very postponement of wars I spoke of may have and keep the lasting and perpetual firmness of peace. For you have said it and fixed it by God's perpetual law, that I should rejoice in this, as you say, great and truly good thing of mine and enjoy it in God, from whom you say I received it, that I should be such and undertake such tasks. You then add: “May God confirm,” you say, “what he has wrought for us through me.” O vows uttered not only for me but for the salvation of all! For this glory of mine cannot be separated from the salvation of all; and for me to be happy by your prayers, all must be happy together with me. For a long time, father, may you take up and utter such vows for the Roman Empire, for the Roman state, and for those too whom you find worthy, and when at last, late, you are taken up to heaven, may you hand them on to posterity and entrust them to those who follow.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Horace, Carm. 1.2.45 (Horace): echo, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- “Late … taken up to heaven”: echo of Horace, Odes 1.2.45 (serus in caelum redeas).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.3 (CSEL 57:500–501; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-3).

## Letter 230.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-4
- Source: CSEL 57:501–502
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius confesses his longing to keep writing, says Augustine's writings freed him from lingering pagan superstition, and asks for the Confessions.

### Latin text

Satis progressus sum fortasse, quam debui, sed parum locutus certe, quam uolui. confiteor enim: scribens ad te uultus mihi tuos tamquam praesentis imaginor et, cum olim me sermo rudis et inops lingua deficiat. tamen, quasi coram tecum conloquar fabulerque. non satior. proinde hinc etiam nostra in te desideria metire. cum iam diu finem mereretur epistularis paginae forsitan ingrata uerbositas, subtrahimus uerecundiam, dum cupiditati consulimus et sermonem relinquere esse a te recedere suspicamur. nolo ergo non desinere, sed non possum. si enim credis, mi pater, ex eo nostris sensibus ac praecordiis inhaesisti, ex quo non contenti tua fama tam gloriosa, tam maxima scriptis te tuis intueri maluimus, cum una mihi atque haec breuis epistula tua ardoris tantas flammas incendiaque commouerit. unde deprecamur te ac tota mente deposcimus, ut, quoniam gentiles ritus te etiam legendo ut numquam alias abunde affatimque contempsimus — quamquam enim a parentibus, ab auis et postrema usque gentis prole Christi iura percepimus, tamen aliquotiens sensibus nostris superfluae superstitionis superba uanitas inerrabat —, peto, ut etiam confessionum libros a te perscriptos nobis mittere ac donare digneris. si enim alii quoque prono animo ac benigna mente tua nobis scripta largiti sunt, quanto magis de tuis ipse excusare non debes!

### English translation (Claude)

I have gone on perhaps further than I should, but certainly said too little compared with what I wished. For I confess: in writing to you I imagine your face as if you were present, and, though rough speech and a poor tongue have long failed me, yet, as if I were conversing and talking with you face to face, I am not satisfied. Measure from this our longing for you. Although the perhaps unwelcome wordiness of this letter has long deserved an end, we lay aside modesty while we serve our desire, and suspect that to leave off speaking is to withdraw from you. So it is not that I do not wish to stop, but I cannot. For, believe me, my father, you have clung to our mind and heart ever since, not content with your fame, so glorious and so great, we preferred to look upon you in your writings, since one letter of yours, and a short one, has stirred such flames and fires of ardor in me. Therefore we beg and ask with our whole mind, since through reading you too we have despised pagan rites amply and fully as never before (for although we received the laws of Christ from our parents, from our grandfathers, and down to the latest offspring of our family, yet sometimes the proud vanity of superfluous superstition wandered into our thoughts), I ask that you deign to send and give us also the books of the Confessions you have written. For if others too have given us their writings readily and kindly, how much less ought you to excuse yourself from giving your own!

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.4 (CSEL 57:501–502; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-4).

## Letter 230.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-5
- Source: CSEL 57:502–503
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius recalls the story of King Abgar's letter to Christ and asks Augustine to intercede daily for his sins.

### Latin text

Fertur satrapae seu regis potius cuiusdam epistula deum dominum Christum deprecantis, cum intra Iudaeae regiones adhuc uersaretur et necdum in caelum suum remeauerat, quoniam is ad eum ire ac pergere per aegritudinem praepediretur et sanari aliter se posse non crederet, ad se, si dignaretur, mundi salus ac medicina decurreret; et ne tantae maiestati, quam ignarus rex prouida sed non perfecta mente conceperat, iniuriam fieri uideretur, laudasse insuper suam dicitur ciuitatem, ut pulchritudine urbis et regis hospitio deus inlectus preces supplicis non dedignaretur. adfuit deus regi, sanatus est; et amplificato petitionis munere per epistulam non modo salutem ut supplici sed etiam securitatem ut regi transmisit; iussit insuper eius urbem ab hostibus in perpetuum esse ac semper immunem. quid his addi beneficiis potest? ego humilis et regum seruus a te meo domino peto, ut apud istum Christum, omnium dominum ac principem deum, cotidie pro meis peccatis intercedere ne cuncteris ac pro me indefessus ores ac petas, quicquid ipse nolueris.

### English translation (Claude)

There is reported a letter of a satrap, or rather a king, who besought the Lord God Christ, while he was still living in the regions of Judea and had not yet returned to his heaven, that, since the king was hindered by sickness from going to him and did not believe he could be healed otherwise, the salvation and medicine of the world might, if he deigned, hasten to him; and, lest any insult seem done to so great a majesty, which the king, not knowing it, had conceived with a foresighted but not perfect mind, he is said also to have praised his city, so that God, attracted by the beauty of the city and the king's hospitality, might not disdain the prayers of the suppliant. God came to the king's aid; he was healed. And, enlarging the gift requested, he sent by letter not only health, as to a suppliant, but also security, as to a king; he ordered moreover that his city should be forever and always free from enemies. What can be added to these benefits? I, lowly and a servant of kings, ask of you, my lord, that you do not hesitate to intercede daily for my sins with this Christ, Lord and sovereign God of all, and that you pray for me untiringly and ask whatever you yourself will.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Abgar (Correspondence of Jesus and Abgar): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The Abgar legend (Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 1.13). The promise that the city would be safe from enemies is a later addition to the story. Darius reports it as tradition (“fertur”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.5 (CSEL 57:502–503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-5).

## Letter 230.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-6
- Source: CSEL 57:503–504
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Darius asks Augustine to write again, sends greetings from his son Verimodus, and sends medicines by the presbyter Lazarus.

### Latin text

Si tibi taedium adfert longa epistula nostra, hoc tuae magnanimitatis patientia moderare et tibi inputa. quoniam ipse iussisti. oramus tamen atque identidem deprecamur, ut iterum scribas; hinc enim fiet, ut libenter suscepisse te scripta nostra suspicari possimus. deus donet nobis beatitudinem tuam per multos annos pro nobis orantem, domine uere sancte pater. filius noster Verimodus multum salutat beatitudinem tuam, qui admodum gratulatus est, quod epistula ad nos tua eius mentionem fecisse dignatus es. nescio qua medicamenta ab archiatro, qui nobiscum est, accepta dedimus Lazaro sancto presbytero ad tuam beatitudinem deferenda; quae, ut uir memoratus adfirmat, ad leuationem doloris et morbi curationem non parum proficient.

### English translation (Claude)

If our long letter wearies you, temper it with the patience of your magnanimity and blame yourself, since you yourself ordered it. Yet we pray and beg again and again that you write once more; for from this we will be able to suppose that you received our writing gladly. May God grant us Your Blessedness for many years praying for us, my truly holy lord father. Our son Verimodus warmly greets Your Blessedness; he was very glad that your letter to us deigned to mention him. We have given the holy presbyter Lazarus some medicines received from the chief physician who is with us, to bring to Your Blessedness; the man I mentioned assures us that they will help not a little to relieve pain and cure illness.

### Translation notes

- Verimodus is probably the “pledge of peace” of Letter 229.2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 230.6 (CSEL 57:503–504; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/228-1/#p-230-6).

## Letter 231.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-1
- Source: CSEL 57:504
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Darius that words cannot express how much his letter delighted him.

### Latin text

Quod acceperim libenter litteras tuas, mea rescripta indicio esse noluisti. ecce rescribo et tamen rescriptis hoc indicare non possum uel istis uel quibuslibet aliis, siue breuiter siue prolixissime scribam; neque enim aut paucis aut multis uerbis indicari potest, quod indicari uerbis non potest. et ego quidem parum eloquor, etsi multum loquor; sed nulli eloquenti omnino concesserim, ut qualicumque et quantacumque epistula sua affectum explicet, quem fecit in me tua, quod non possum ego, etiam si eum possit ita in animo meo uidere sicut ego. restat ergo sic tibi indicare, quod scire uoluisti, ut in uerbis meis, et quod non indicant. sentias. quid igitur dicam nisi delectatum me esse litteris tuis ualde ualde? repetitio uerbi huius non est repetitio sed quasi perpetua dictio; quia enim fieri non posset, ut semper diceretur, ideo factum est, ut saltem repeteretur: sic enim fortasse dici potest, quod dici non potest.

### English translation (Claude)

You wished my reply to be the evidence that I received your letter gladly. Here I am replying, and yet I cannot show this by my reply, whether this one or any other, whether I write briefly or at great length; for what cannot be shown in words cannot be shown in few words or in many. I indeed speak little eloquently even when I speak much; but I would grant to no eloquent man at all that by any letter, of whatever kind or length, he could express the feeling your letter produced in me, which I cannot do, even if he could see it in my mind as I do. It remains, then, to show you what you wished to know in such a way that in my words you may feel even what they do not show. What, then, shall I say, except that I was delighted with your letter, very, very much? The repetition of this word is not repetition but as it were a perpetual saying; because it could not be said forever, it was at least repeated: for perhaps in this way what cannot be said can be said.

### Translation notes

- To Darius (429).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.1 (CSEL 57:504; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-1).

## Letter 231.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-2
- Source: CSEL 57:504–505
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that he did enjoy Darius's eloquence and praise, but neither was the chief cause of his delight.

### Latin text

Hic si quaerat aliquis, quid me tandem in tuis tam ualde litteris delectauerit, utrum eloquium, respondebo: Non; et ille forsitan respondebit: Ergo laudes tuae; sed de his quoque respondebo: Non nec ideo, quia non sunt ista in illa epistula: nam et eloquium ibi tantum est, ut et optimo te natum ingenio et talibus disciplinis satis eruditum praeclarissime luceat, et prorsus plena est meis laudibus. ergone, ait quispiam, non te ista delectant? immo uero; neque enim mihi, ut ait quidam, cornea fibra est, ut haec non sentiam uel sine delectatione sentiam. delectant et ista; sed ad illud, quo me ualde dixi esse delectatum, quid sunt ista? nam eloquium tuum me delectat, quoniam grauiter suaue est uel suauiter graue: meis autem laudibus cum profecto nec omnibus delecter nec ab omnibus sed eis, qualibus me dignum esse arbitratus es. et ab eis. qualis es, id est qui propter Christum diligunt seruos eius. etiam laudibus meis me delectatum in litteris tuis negare non possum.

### English translation (Claude)

If someone here should ask what it was in your letter that delighted me so very much, whether its eloquence, I will answer: No. And he may answer: Then your praises. But to these too I will answer: No. And not because these are not in that letter: for there is so much eloquence there that it shines out most brilliantly that you were born with the finest talent and are well educated in such studies, and it is altogether full of my praises. “So,” someone says, “these things do not delight you?” Indeed they do; for my heart is not, as someone says, made of horn, so that I do not feel them or feel them without delight. These things too delight me; but compared with what I said delighted me very much, what are they? For your eloquence delights me because it is gravely sweet or sweetly grave. As for my praises, although I am certainly not delighted by all of them nor by everyone's, but by such as you thought me worthy of and from such men as you are, that is, those who love Christ's servants for Christ's sake, I cannot deny that I was delighted even by my praises in your letter.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Persius, Sat. 1.47 (Persius, Satires): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “Made of horn”: Persius, Sat. 1.47.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.2 (CSEL 57:504–505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-2).

## Letter 231.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-3
- Source: CSEL 57:505–506
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine discusses the love of praise, citing Themistocles, Ennius, and Horace, and distinguishes seeking truth from vanity in human praise.

### Latin text

Viderint graues et periti uiri, quid de illo Themistocle sentiant, si tamen hominis nomen uerum recolo, qui cum in epulis, quod clari et eruditi Graeciae facere solebant, canere fidibus recusasset et ob hoc indoctior haberetur totumque illud iucunditatis genus aspernatus esset, dictum illi est: Quid ergo audire te delectat? ad quod ille respondisse fertur: Laudes meas. uiderint ergo, quo fine qua intentione illud dixisse crediderint uel ipse qua dixerit. erat enim secundum hoc saeculum uir magnificus. nam etiam cum ei dictum fuisset: Quid igitur nosti? Rem publicam, inquit, ex parua magnam facere. ego autem, quod ait Ennius: (Omnes mortales sese laudari exoptant), partim puto adprobandum partim cauendum. ut enim appetenda est ueritas, quae procul dubio est, etiam si non laudetur, sola laudabilis. sic ea, quae facile subrepit, uanitas in hominum laude fugienda est: haec est autem, cum uel ipsa bona. quae laudatione digna sunt, non putantur habenda, nisi laudetur ab hominibus homo. uel ea quoque uult in se multum quisque laudari, quae aut exigua laude aut etiam uituperatione digniora sunt. unde Horatius Ennio uigilantior ait: Laudis amore tumes? sunt certa piacula, quae te ter pure lecto poterunt recreare libello.

### English translation (Claude)

Let grave and learned men decide what they think of that Themistocles, if I recall the man's name correctly, who, when at a banquet he refused to play the lyre, as the famous and learned men of Greece used to do, and was therefore thought rather uncultured, and had scorned that whole kind of pleasure, was asked: “What, then, do you enjoy hearing?” To which he is said to have answered: “My own praises.” Let them decide, then, with what aim and intention they believe he said it, or with what intention he did say it. For he was, by the standards of this world, a magnificent man; for when he had also been asked, “What, then, do you know?” he said, “How to make a small state great.” But as for what Ennius says, “All mortals long to be praised,” I think it partly to be approved and partly to be guarded against. For as truth is to be sought, which beyond doubt is alone praiseworthy even if it is not praised, so the vanity that easily creeps in with human praise is to be shunned. And this is it: when even the good things that are worthy of praise are not thought worth having unless a man is praised by men; or when each one wants to be much praised for things in himself that deserve little praise or even blame. Hence Horace, more watchful than Ennius, says: “Do you swell with love of praise? There are sure remedies that can restore you if you read the little book three times with purity.”

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Arch. 20 (Cicero): allusion, medium confidence
- Ennius (Ennius): quotation, high confidence
- Horace, Ep. 1.1.36–37 (Horace): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Themistocles: Cicero, Pro Archia 20 and Tusc. 1.2.4. Ennius, fragment (source uncertain). Horace, Ep. 1.1.36–37.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.3 (CSEL 57:505–506; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-3).

## Letter 231.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-4
- Source: CSEL 57:506–507
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains, from Paul, that praise should be sought not for oneself but for the good of those who praise, and says Darius's praise spurs him to become what he is praised for.

### Latin text

Ita tumorem de amore laudis humanae uelut serpentis morsum medicinalibus uerbis quasi excantandum putauit. docuit itaque nos per apostolum suum magister bonus neque propterea nos recte uiuere et recte facere, ut laudemur ab hominibus, id est finem recti nostri non in hominum laudibus ponere et tamen propter ipsos homines quaerere laudes hominum. etenim cum laudantur boni, non laudatis sed laudantibus prodest. nam illis, quantum ad ipsos adtinet, quod boni sunt, sufficit; sed eis, quibus expedit imitari bonos, gratulandum est, cum ab eis laudantur boni, quoniam sic indicant eos sibi placere, quos ueraciter laudant. dicit ergo apostolus quodam loco: Si hominibus placerem, Christi seruus non essem, et idem dicit alio loco: Placete omnibus per omnia, sicut et ego omnibus per omnia placeo, sed adiungens causam: Non quaerens, quod mihi utile est. sed quod multis, ut salui fiant. ecce, quod quaerebat in laude hominum, ubi etiam dicebat: De cetero. fratres, quaecumque sunt uera, quaecumque pudica, quaecumque casta, quaecumque sancta, quaecumque carissima, quaecumque bonae famae. si qua uirtus. si qua laus, haec cogitate; quae didicistis et accepistis et audistis et uidistis in me, haec agite et deus pacis erit uobiscum. cetera igitur, quae supra commemorauit. uirtutis nomine amplexus est dicens si qua uirtus; illud autem, quod subiecit quaecumque bonae famae, alio uno uerbo congruo prosecutus est dicendo si qua laus. quod itaque ait: Si hominibus placerem, Christi seruus non essem, sic utique accipiendum est, tamquam dixerit: Si bona. quae facio, fine laudis humanae facerem, laudis amore tumescerem,. uolebat ergo apostolus placere omnibus et eis placere gaudebat, non quorum laudibus tumescebat in se ipso, sed quos laudatus aedificabat in Christo. cur ergo me non delectet laudari abs te, cum et uir bonus sis, ne me fallas, et ea laudes, quae amas et quae amare utile ac salubre est, etiam si non sint in me? neque hoc tibi tantum sed etiam mihi prodest. si enim non sunt in me, salubriter erubesco atque, ut sint, inardesco. ac per hoc, quae agnosco mea in laude tua, gaudeo me habere et abs te illa ac me ipsum diligi propter illa: quae autem non agnosco, non solum, ut ipse habeam, desidero consequi uerum etiam, ne semper in mea laude fallantur, qui me sinceriter diligunt.

### English translation (Claude)

So he thought that the swelling from the love of human praise should be charmed away with healing words, like a serpent's bite. Accordingly the good Teacher taught us through his apostle that we should not live rightly and act rightly in order to be praised by men, that is, should not place the goal of our right conduct in men's praises, and yet should seek men's praise for the sake of those men themselves. For when the good are praised, it profits not those praised but those who praise. For the good, as far as they themselves are concerned, it is enough that they are good; but those for whom it is profitable to imitate the good are to be congratulated when they praise the good, since they thereby show that those whom they truly praise please them. So the apostle says in one place, “If I were pleasing men, I would not be a servant of Christ”; and the same man says in another place, “Please all in all things, as I also please all in all things,” but adding the reason: “not seeking what is profitable to me, but to many, that they may be saved.” See what he sought in the praise of men, where he also said: “Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is modest, whatever is chaste, whatever is holy, whatever is most lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any virtue, if there is any praise, think on these things. What you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, do these things, and the God of peace will be with you.” The other things he listed above he embraced under the name of virtue, saying “if there is any virtue”; but what he added, “whatever is of good repute,” he followed with another single fitting word, saying “if there is any praise.” So his saying, “If I were pleasing men, I would not be a servant of Christ,” must surely be taken as if he had said: “If I did the good things I do with human praise as their goal, I would be swelling with love of praise.” The apostle, then, wished to please all and rejoiced to please them, not those by whose praises he swelled in himself, but those whom, being praised, he built up in Christ. Why, then, should I not be delighted to be praised by you, since you are both a good man, so as not to deceive me, and you praise things that you love and that it is useful and wholesome to love, even if they are not in me? And this profits not only you but me too. For if they are not in me, I blush wholesomely and burn with desire that they may be. And so, the things I recognize as mine in your praise, I rejoice to have, and that they and I for their sake are loved by you; but the things I do not recognize, I long to attain, not only so that I may have them, but also so that those who love me sincerely may not always be deceived in praising me.

### Scripture references

- Gal 1:10: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 10:33: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 4:8–9: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 6:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Gal 1:10; 1 Cor 10:33 (the first clause adapted); Phil 4:8–9. Allusion: Matt 6:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.4 (CSEL 57:506–507; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-4).

## Letter 231.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-5
- Source: CSEL 57:507–508
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the chief delight of Darius's letter was gaining him as a friend, whose commendation will spread his writings against paganism.

### Latin text

Ecce quam multa dixi et, quid sit illud, quod me longe amplius eloquio tuo, longe amplius laudibus meis in tuis litteris delectauit, non adhuc dixi. quid autem putas esse, o bone homo. nisi quod te talem uirum etiam non uisum feci amicum, si tamen non uisum dicere debeo, cuius non corpus sed animum in ipsis tuis litteris uidi. ubi de te non sicut antea fratribus meis sed mihi credidi? quis enim esses, iam quidem acceperam, sed qualis erga me esses, nondum tenebam. ex hac amicitia tua etiam laudes meas, quae me quo fine delectent. satis dixi, multo uberius ecclesiae Christi non dubito profuturas. quando quidem etiam labores meos in defensione euangelii aduersus reliquias impiorum daemonicolarum sic habes, sic legis, sic amas, sic praedicas, ut in eis tanto fiam notior, quanto es ipse nobilior; eos enim latentes inlustris inlustras clarusque declaras et, ubi prodesse posse perspicies, ignorari omnino non sines. si, unde id sciam, quaeris, talis mihi apparuisti in litteris tuis. hinc iam uide, quantum me illae litterae delectare potuerint, si bene de me existimans cogitas, quantum me Christi lucra delectent. iam uero quod te ipsum, qui, ut scribis, a parentibus. ab auis et postrema usque gentis prole Christi iura percipere potuisti. tamen aduersus gentiles ritus ut numquam alias eisdem laboribus meis adiutum esse significas, parumne cogito, quantum boni aliis et quam multis. quam claris et quam facile quamque salubriter per illos ceteris, quibus talia conueniunt, possint scripta nostra te commendante ac disseminante conferre? aut hoc cogitans possumne paruorum uel mediocrium gaudiorum iucunditate perfundi?

### English translation (Claude)

See how much I have said, and I have not yet said what it was that delighted me in your letter far more than your eloquence, far more than my praises. What do you think it is, good man, except that I have made a man such as you my friend even without seeing you, if indeed I should say “without seeing” one whose mind, not body, I saw in your very letter, where I believed about you not my brothers, as before, but myself? For who you were I had already heard, but what you were toward me I did not yet know. From this friendship of yours I have no doubt that even my praises, with what aim they delight me I have said enough, will profit the Church of Christ much more richly, since you so possess, so read, so love and so commend my labors in defense of the gospel against the remnants of the impious demon-worshipers, that I become the better known in them the nobler you yourself are; for, illustrious and renowned as you are, you make them illustrious and renowned where they were hidden, and where you see they can be of use you will not let them be wholly unknown. If you ask how I know this, so you appeared to me in your letter. From this see how much that letter could delight me, if, thinking well of me, you consider how much the gains of Christ delight me. And now, when you tell me that you yourself, who, as you write, could receive the laws of Christ from your parents, from your grandfathers, and down to the latest offspring of your family, have nevertheless been helped against pagan rites by these same labors of mine as never before, do I think it a small thing how much good our writings, commended and spread by you, may bring to others, and to how many, how distinguished, how easily and how wholesomely, and through them to the rest whom such things suit? Or, thinking of this, can I be filled with the pleasure of small or middling joys?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.5 (CSEL 57:507–508; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-5).

## Letter 231.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-6
- Source: CSEL 57:508–510
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Darius the Confessions, telling him to see there what he really was and to praise God, and begs his prayers.

### Latin text

Quia igitur non potui uerbis explicare, quantam delectationem de tuis litteris ceperim, unde me delectauerint, dixi. iam quod nequiui satis dicere, id est quantum delectauerint, tibi coniciendum relinquo. sume itaque, mi fili. sume, uir bone et non in superficie sed Christiana caritate Christiane. sume, inquam, etiam libros. quos desiderasti, confessionum mearum: ibi me inspice, ne me laudes ultra, quam sum, ibi non aliis de me crede sed mihi, ibi me adtende et uide, quid fuerim in me ipso per me ipsum. et si quid in me tibi placuerit, lauda ibi mecum. quem laudari uolui de me, neque enim me, quoniam ipse fecit nos et non ipsi nos; nos autem perdideramus nos, sed, qui fecit, refecit. cum autem ibi me inueneris, ora pro me, ne deficiam, sed perficiar; ora, fili, ora. sentio, quid dicam, scio, quid petam; non tibi uideatur indignum et quasi ultra merita tua; fraudabis me magno adiutorio, si non feceris. non solum tu sed etiam omnes, qui me ex ore tuo dilexerint, orate pro me. hoc eis me petiuisse indica aut, si multum nobis tribuitis, iussisse nos existimate, quod petimus; et tamen date petentibus uel obtemperate iubentibus. orate pro nobis. lege litteras dei et inuenies ipsos arietes nostros apostolos petisse hoc a filiis suis siue praecepisse auditoribus suis. ego certe, quoniam hoc a me petisti pro te, quantum faciam, uidet, qui exaudiat, qui uidebat, quia et ante faciebam; sed redde etiam in hac re dilectionis uicem. praepositi uestri sumus, grex dei estis; considerate et uidete pericula nostra maiora esse quam uestra et orate pro nobis. hoc enim et nobis conducit et uobis, ut bonam rationem de nobis reddamus pastorum principi et omnium nostrum capiti pariterque euadamus huius mundi periculosiores blanditias quam molestias. nisi cum pax eius ad hoc proficit, quod apostolus orare nos monuit, id est ut quietam uitam et tranquillam agamus in omni pietate et caritate. si enim desit pietas et caritas, quid est ab illis et a ceteris mundi malis tranquillitas et quies nisi luxuriae perditionisque materies siue inuitamentum siue adiumentum? ut ergo habeamus quietam et tranquillam uitam in omni pietate et caritate. quod oro pro nobis, orate pro nobis, ubicumque estis, ubicumque sumus; nusquam enim non est, cuius sumus.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, I could not explain in words how great a delight I took from your letter, I have said what delighted me in it. What I could not say adequately, that is, how much it delighted me, I leave you to guess. Take, then, my son, take, good man, and Christian not on the surface but in Christian love, take, I say, also the books of my Confessions that you wanted. There look at me, so that you may not praise me beyond what I am; there believe not others about me but me; there pay attention to me and see what I was in myself, through myself. And if anything in me pleases you, praise there with me him whom I wished to be praised for me, and not me; for he made us and not we ourselves; and we had ruined ourselves, but he who made us remade us. And when you find me there, pray for me, that I may not fail but be made perfect; pray, my son, pray. I feel what I am saying; I know what I am asking. Let it not seem unworthy of you and as if beyond your merits; you will cheat me of a great help if you do not do it. Not only you, but all who have come to love me from your mouth, pray for me. Tell them that I asked this, or, if you attribute much to us, consider that we commanded what we ask; and yet grant it to us asking, or obey us commanding. Pray for us. Read the letters of God, and you will find that our very rams, the apostles, asked this of their sons or commanded it of their hearers. For my part, since you asked this of me for yourself, how much I do it he sees who hears, who saw that I was doing it even before; but return love's exchange in this matter too. We are your leaders; you are God's flock. Consider and see that our dangers are greater than yours, and pray for us. For this benefits both us and you, that we may render a good account of ourselves to the chief of shepherds and head of us all, and may likewise escape the flatteries of this world, more dangerous than its troubles, unless its peace serves the end for which the apostle bade us pray, that is, that we may lead a quiet and peaceful life in all godliness and love. For if godliness and love are lacking, what is tranquillity and quiet from those troubles and the other evils of the world but the material, or the enticement, or the aid of luxury and perdition? So that we may have a quiet and peaceful life in all godliness and love, which I pray for you, pray for us, wherever you are, wherever we are; for there is nowhere that he is not whose we are.

### Scripture references

- Ps 100:3 (99:3 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Heb 13:17: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 5:4: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 2:2: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Ps 100:3 (LXX 99:3); Heb 13:17; 1 Pet 5:4; 1 Tim 2:2 (Old Latin “love” for “dignity”). “Rams”: the apostles as leaders of the flock.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.6 (CSEL 57:508–510; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-6).

## Letter 231.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-7
- Source: CSEL 57:510–511
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sends Darius several other works, asks for his judgment, and thanks him for gifts for his health and library.

### Latin text

Misi et alios libros, quos non petisti, ne hoc tantum modo facerem, quod petisti: de fide rerum, quae non uidentur, de patientia, de continentia, de prouidentia et unum grandem de fide et spe et caritate. hos omnes si, dum es intra Africam. legeris, iudicium tuum mitte de illis, aut mitte nobis aut, quod nobis a domino sene Aurelio mittatur, ibi dimitte. quamquam et, ubicumque fueris, speramus inde litteras tuas et hinc tu, dum possumus, nostras. suscepi gratissime, quae misisti, ubi et salutem meam quamuis corporalem, quoniam uis me utique sine impedimento malae ualitudinis deo uacare, et bibliothecam nostram, ut sit, unde libri uel parentur uel reparentur, adiuuare dignatus es. rependat tibi dominus et hic et in futuro saeculo bona, quae talibus, qualem te esse uoluit, praeparauit. pignus pacis apud te depositum nostrumque utrique dulcissimum sicut ante a me salutari ita nunc resalutari peto.

### English translation (Claude)

I have also sent other books, which you did not ask for, so as not to do only what you asked: On Faith in Things Not Seen, On Patience, On Continence, On Providence, and one large one On Faith, Hope and Love. If you read all of these while you are in Africa, send me your judgment on them; either send it to us, or leave it there to be sent to us by the aged lord Aurelius. Though wherever you may be, we hope for your letters from there, and you for ours from here, while we can. I received most gratefully what you sent, by which you deigned to help both my health, bodily though it is, since you surely want me to be free for God without the hindrance of ill health, and our library, so that there may be means to provide or restore books. May the Lord repay you both here and in the world to come with the good things he has prepared for such as he willed you to be. I ask you to greet again for me the pledge of peace deposited with you, most dear to us both, as I greeted it before.

### Translation notes

- On Providence is not otherwise known as a separate work of Augustine; its identity is uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 231.7 (CSEL 57:510–511; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-231-7).

## Letter 232.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-1
- Source: CSEL 57:511
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the pagan council of Madaura why they greeted him “in the Lord” while still worshiping idols, unless they mean to mock him.

### Latin text

Si forte illi, qui inter uos catholici Christiani sunt, talia mihi scripta miserunt, hoc tantum miror, quod non suo potius quam ordinis nomine. si autem re uera omnes aut prope omnes ordinis uiri ad me dignati estis litteras dare, miror, quod patri et in domino salutem scripsistis, quorum mihi superstitiosus cultus idolorum, contra quae idola facilius templa uestra quam corda clauduntur uel potius quae idola non magis in templis quam in uestris cordibus includuntur, cum magno est dolore notissimus, nisi forte iam de salute ipsa, quae in domino est, per quam me salutare uoluistis, tandem prudenti consideratione cogitatis. nam si non ita est, quaeso uos, quid laesi, quid offendi beniuolentiam uestram, ut me titulo epistulae uestrae inridendum potius quam honorandum esse putaretis, domini praedicabiles et dilectissimi fratres?

### English translation (Claude)

If perhaps those among you who are Catholic Christians sent me such a letter, I only wonder that they did so not in their own name rather than in the name of the council. But if truly all or almost all the men of the council have deigned to write to me, I wonder that you wrote “to father” and “greeting in the Lord,” since your superstitious worship of idols is very well known to me, to my great grief, idols against which your temples are more easily shut than your hearts, or rather which are shut up not more in your temples than in your hearts; unless perhaps you are at last thinking with prudent consideration of that very salvation which is in the Lord, by which you wished to greet me. For if it is not so, I ask you, how have I hurt, how have I offended your goodwill, that you thought I should be mocked rather than honored by the heading of your letter, my praiseworthy lords and dearly beloved brothers?

### Translation notes

- To the council (ordo) of Madaura, Augustine's own school town. The play is on salus (“greeting” and “salvation”).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.1 (CSEL 57:511; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-1).

## Letter 232.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-2
- Source: CSEL 57:511–512
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the Madaurans' Christian greeting and closing must be either sincere, in which case nothing bars them from the Church, or mockery of Christ's name.

### Latin text

Quod enim scripsistis: Patri Augustino in domino aeternam salutem, cum legerem, tanta spe subito erectus sum, ut crederem uos ad ipsum dominum et ad ipsam aeternam salutem aut iam esse conuersos aut per nostrum ministerium desiderare conuerti. sed ubi legi cetera, refriguit animus meus; quaesiui tamen ab epistulae perlatore, utrum iam uel essetis Christiani uel esse cuperetis. cuius responsione posteaquam comperi nequaquam uos esse mutatos, grauius dolui, quod Christi nomen, cui iam totum orbem subiectum esse conspicitis, non solum a uobis repellendum sed etiam in nobis inridendum esse credidistis. non enim potui cogitare alterum dominum, secundum quem posset episcopus pater a uobis uocari, praeter dominum Christum et, si esset hinc aliqua de interpretatione uestrae sententiae dubitatio, subscriptione epistulae tolleretur, ubi aperte posuistis: Optamus te, domine, in deo et Christo eius per multos annos semper in clero tuo gaudere. quibus omnibus perlectis atque discussis quid aliud mihi occurrere potuit aut cuilibet homini potest nisi aut ueridico aut fallaci scribentium animo haec esse conscripta? sed si ueridico animo ista scribitis, quis uobis ad hanc ueritatem interclusit uiam? quis aspera dumeta substrauit? quis rupium praerupta inimicus opposuit? postremo quis basilicae ianuam ingredi cupientibus clausit, ut in eodem domino, per quem nos salutatis, eandem salutem nobiscum habere nolitis? si autem fallaciter atque inridenter haec scribitis, itane tandem mihi negotia uestra curanda inponitis, ut nomen eius, per quem aliquid possum, audeatis non ueneratione debita adtollere sed insultatione adulatoria uentilare?

### English translation (Claude)

For when I read what you wrote, “To father Augustine, eternal salvation in the Lord,” I was suddenly raised to such hope that I believed you had either already turned to the Lord himself and to that eternal salvation, or desired to be turned through our ministry. But when I read the rest, my mind grew cold. I asked the bearer of the letter, however, whether you were already Christians or wished to be. After I learned from his answer that you were in no way changed, I grieved the more deeply that you thought the name of Christ, to whom you see the whole world now subject, should not only be rejected by you but also mocked in us. For I could not think of any other lord according to whom a bishop could be called father by you except the Lord Christ; and if there were any doubt about the interpretation of your meaning here, it would be removed by the closing of the letter, where you plainly put: “We wish that you, lord, may always rejoice in God and his Christ for many years among your clergy.” When all this was read and examined, what else could occur to me, or can occur to anyone, but that these things were written either with a truthful or with a deceitful mind? But if you write these things with a truthful mind, who has barred your way to this truth? Who has strewn rough thorns in it? What enemy has set the steep rocks in your path? Finally, who has shut the door of the church to you who wish to enter, so that you will not have the same salvation with us in the same Lord through whom you greet us? But if you write these things deceitfully and mockingly, do you then lay your business on me to look after, and at the same time dare, not to exalt with due veneration the name of him through whom I can do anything, but to toss it about with flattering insult?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.2 (CSEL 57:511–512; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-2).

## Letter 232.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-3
- Source: CSEL 57:512–514
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from fulfilled prophecy: the dispersion of the Jews, the spread of the gospel, heresies and schisms, and the fall of idolatry and conversion of the emperors.

### Latin text

Sciatis me, carissimi, cum ineffabili pro uobis tremore cordis haec dicere; noui enim, quanto grauiorem et perniciosiorem causam sitis habituri apud deum. si frustra uobis haec dixero. omnia, quae praeteritis temporibus erga humanum genus maiores nostri gesta esse meminerunt nobisque tradiderunt, omnia etiam, quae nos uidemus et posteris tradimus, quae tamen pertinent ad ueram religionem quaerendam et tenendam, diuina scriptura non tacuit, sed ita omnino cuncta transeunt, ut transitura esse praedicta sunt. uidetis certe populum Iudaeorum auulsum a sedibus suis per omnes fere terras disseminatum atque diffusum; et origo eiusdem populi et incrementa et regni amissio et per cuncta dispersio sicut praedicta, ita facta sunt. uidetis certe ex ipso populo uerbum dei legemque prodeuntem per Christum, qui ex illis mirabiliter natus est, omnium gentium fidem occupasse atque tenuisse; ita haec omnia praenuntiata legimus, ut uidemus. uidetis certe multos praecisos a radice Christianae societatis, quae per sedes apostolorum et successiones episcoporum certa per orbem propagatione diffunditur, de sola figura originis sub Christiano nomine quasi arescentia sarmenta gloriari, quas haereses et schismata nominamus; praeuisa, praedicta, scripta sunt omnia. uidetis certe simulacrorum templa partim sine reparatione conlapsa partim diruta partim clausa partim in usus alios commutata ipsaque simulacra uel confringi uel incendi uel includi uel destrui atque ipsas huius saeculi potestates, quae aliquando pro simulacris populum Christianum persequebantur, uictas et domitas non a repugnantibus sed a morientibus Christianis et contra eadem simulacra, pro quibus Christianos occidebant, impetus suos legesque uertisse et imperii nobilissimi eminentissimum culmen ad sepulcrum piscatoris Petri submisso diademate supplicare.

### English translation (Claude)

Know, dearest friends, that I say this with an unspeakable trembling of heart for you; for I know how much heavier and more ruinous a case you will have before God if I say these things to you in vain. All that our forebears remembered to have happened to the human race in past times and handed down to us, and all that we too see and hand down to posterity, insofar as it concerns seeking and holding the true religion, divine Scripture has not kept silent about; but everything passes exactly as it was foretold that it would pass. You certainly see the Jewish people torn from their homeland and scattered and spread over almost all lands; and the origin of that people, its growth, the loss of its kingdom and its dispersion everywhere happened as they were foretold. You certainly see that the word of God and the law, coming forth from that people through Christ, who was wonderfully born of them, has taken hold of and held the faith of all nations; we read all this foretold just as we see it. You certainly see many cut off from the root of the Christian fellowship, which is spread through the world by sure propagation through the sees of the apostles and the successions of bishops, glorying under the Christian name only in the appearance of their origin, like withering branches; these we call heresies and schisms. All was foreseen, foretold, written. You certainly see the temples of idols partly fallen without repair, partly torn down, partly closed, partly converted to other uses, and the idols themselves broken or burned or shut up or destroyed; and the very powers of this world which once persecuted the Christian people for the sake of idols conquered and tamed, not by Christians fighting back but by Christians dying, and turning their attacks and laws against those same idols for which they used to kill Christians; and the highest summit of the noblest empire laying down its diadem and making supplication at the tomb of Peter the fisherman.

### Scripture references

- Isa 2:3: allusion, medium confidence
- John 15:6: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The Jewish dispersion is presented as fulfilled prophecy, as was common in the period. Allusions: Isa 2:3; John 15:6 (withered branches).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.3 (CSEL 57:512–514; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-3).

## Letter 232.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-4
- Source: CSEL 57:514
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns that the judgment foretold in Scripture will surely come like the rest, and no one can plead ignorance, since everyone speaks of Christ.

### Latin text

Haec omnia diuinae scripturae, quae in manus omnium iam uenerunt, ante longissima tempora futura esse testatae sunt: haec omnia tanto robustiore fide laetamur fieri, quanto maiore auctoritate praedicta esse in sanctis litteris inuenimus. numquidnam, obsecro uos, numquidnam solum iudicium dei, quod inter fideles atque infideles futurum esse in eisdem litteris legimus, cum illa omnia, sicut praedicta sunt, uenerint, numquidnam solum iudicium dei uenturum non esse putabimus? immo uero ueniet, sicut omnia illa uenerunt. nec quisquam erit homo nostrorum temporum, qui se in illo iudicio de sua possit infidelitate defendere, cum Christum cantet et iustus ad aequitatem et periurus ad fraudem et rex ad imperium et miles ad pugnam et maritus propter regimen et uxor propter obsequium et pater propter praeceptum et filius propter oboedientiam et dominus propter dominationem et seruus propter famulatum et humilis ad pietatem et superbus ad aemulationem et diues, ut porrigat, et pauper, ut sumat, et ebriosus ad phialam et mendicus ad ianuam et bonus, ut praestet, et malus, ut fallat, et Christianus uenerator et paganus adulator: omnes Christum cantant et, qua uoluntate atque ore cantent, eidem ipsi, quem cantant, rationem sine dubio reddituri sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

All these things the divine Scriptures, which have now come into everyone's hands, testified long ages ago would happen; we rejoice that all these things are happening with a faith the firmer the greater the authority with which we find them foretold in the holy writings. Shall we then, I beg you, shall we think that the judgment of God alone, which we read in the same writings will come between believers and unbelievers, when all those other things have come as they were foretold, shall we think that God's judgment alone will not come? No indeed, it will come, as all those things have come. Nor will there be any man of our times who can defend himself at that judgment for his unbelief, since Christ is sung by the just man for fairness and the perjurer for fraud, by the king for rule and the soldier for battle, by the husband for governing and the wife for submission, by the father for commanding and the son for obedience, by the master for lordship and the slave for service, by the humble for devotion and the proud for rivalry, by the rich man to give and the poor man to receive, by the drunkard at his cup and the beggar at the door, by the good man to do good and the bad man to deceive, by the Christian as worshiper and the pagan as flatterer: all sing of Christ, and with what will and what mouth they sing, they will without doubt give account to him of whom they sing.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.4 (CSEL 57:514; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-4).

## Letter 232.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-5
- Source: CSEL 57:514–515
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine sketches for the Madaurans the Trinity, the Father as invisible Beginning, the equal Word, and the Holy Spirit as their communion, accessible only to the humble.

### Latin text

Est quiddam inuisibile. ex quo creatore principio sunt omnia. quae uidemus. summum, aeternum, incommutabile et nulli effabile nisi tantum sibi. est quiddam, quo se ipsa summitas maiestatis narrat et praedicat, non inpar gignenti atque narranti uerbum, quo ille, qui uerbum gignit, ostenditur. est quaedam sanctitas omnium, quae sancte fiunt, sanctificatrix, ipsius incommutabilis uerbi, per quod narratur illud principium, et ipsius principii, quod pari se uerbo narrat, inseparabilis et indiuisa communio. quis autem hoc totum, quod non dicendo dicere conatus sum et dicendo non dicere. quis hoc possit serenissima et sincerissima mente contueri eoque contuitu beatitudinem ducere atque in id, quod intuetur, deficiens quodam modo se obliuisci et pergere in illud, cuius uisione sibi uilis est, quod est inmortalitate indui et obtinere aeternam salutem. per quam me salutare dignamini? quis hoc possit. nisi qui omnes superbiae suae toros inanes peccata sua confitens complanauerit seque substrauerit mitem atque humilem ad excipiendum doctorem deum?

### English translation (Claude)

There is something invisible, from which as Creator and Beginning are all things that we see: highest, eternal, unchangeable, and utterable by none except itself. There is that by which the very summit of majesty utters and proclaims itself, the Word, not unequal to the one who begets and utters it, by which he who begets the Word is shown. There is a certain Holiness, sanctifier of all that is done in holiness, the inseparable and undivided communion of that unchangeable Word through which that Beginning is uttered and of the Beginning itself, which utters itself by an equal Word. But who could behold this whole, which I have tried to say without saying and not to say in saying, who could behold it with a most serene and pure mind, and draw happiness from that beholding, and, failing in some way into what it beholds, forget itself and pass into that by whose vision it is worthless in its own eyes, which is to be clothed with immortality and to obtain the eternal salvation with which you deign to greet me? Who could do this, except one who, confessing his sins, has leveled all the empty swellings of his pride and laid himself down meek and humble to receive God as teacher?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:53: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 11:29: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:53; Matt 11:29.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.5 (CSEL 57:514–515; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-5).

## Letter 232.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-6
- Source: CSEL 57:515–516
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the Word became man to cure pride by humility, and that Christ crucified, confirmed by miracles, has conquered the world.

### Latin text

Quoniam ergo a uanitate superbiae prius ad humilitatem deponendi sumus, ut inde surgentes solidam celsitudinem teneamus, non potuit nobis hoc tanto magnificentius quanto blandius inspirari, ut nostra ferocitas non ui sed persuasione sedaretur, nisi uerbum illud, per quod se angelis indicat deus pater. quod uirtus et sapientia eius est, quod corde humano uisibilium rerum cupiditate caecato uideri non poterat, personam suam in homine agere atque ostendere dignaretur, ut magis homo timeret extolli fastu hominis quam humiliari exemplo dei. itaque non Christus regno terreno decoratus nec Christus terrenis opibus diues nec Christus ulla terrena felicitate praefulgens sed Christus crucifixus per totum terrarum. orbem praedicatur, quod riserunt prius populi superborum et adhuc rident reliquiae, crediderunt autem prius pauci, nunc populi, quia tunc ad fidem paucorum et contra inrisionem populorum, cum Christus crucifixus praedicaretur, claudi ambulabant, muti loquebantur, surdi audiebant, caeci uidebant, mortui resurgebant. sic tandem animaduertit terrena superbia nihil in ipsis terris esse potentius humilitate diuina, ut etiam saluberrima humilitas humana contra insultantem sibi superbiam diuinae imitationis patrocinio tueretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, we must first be brought down from the vanity of pride to humility, so that rising from there we may hold a solid height, this could not have been inspired in us more magnificently or more gently, so that our fierceness might be calmed not by force but by persuasion, unless that Word through which God the Father makes himself known to the angels, which is his power and wisdom, which could not be seen by a human heart blinded by desire for visible things, had deigned to act and show his person in a man, so that man might fear to be lifted up by human pride more than to be humbled by God's example. And so it is not Christ adorned with an earthly kingdom, nor Christ rich in earthly wealth, nor Christ shining with any earthly happiness, but Christ crucified who is preached through the whole world: at which the peoples of the proud first laughed, and the remnant still laughs; but at first a few believed, now whole peoples, because then, when Christ crucified was preached, to support the faith of the few and against the mockery of the peoples, the lame walked, the dumb spoke, the deaf heard, the blind saw, the dead rose. So at last earthly pride perceived that nothing on earth is more powerful than divine humility, so that even the most wholesome human humility might be protected against the pride that mocks it by the patronage of imitating God.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 1:23–24: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 11:5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 1:23–24; Matt 11:5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.6 (CSEL 57:515–516; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-6).

## Letter 232.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-7
- Source: CSEL 57:516–517
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges the Madaurans to wake up, mentions helping Florentius, and warns them to fear Christ the judge if they meant to mock.

### Latin text

Expergiscimini aliquando, fratres mei et parentes mei Madaurenses; hanc occasionem scribendi uobis deus mihi obtulit. quantum potui quidem in negotio fratris Florenti, per quem litteras misistis, sicut deus uoluit, adfui et adiuui; sed tale negotium erat, quod etiam sine opera mea facile peragi posset; prope omnes enim domus ipsius homines, qui apud Hipponem sunt, nouerunt Florentium et multum eius orbitatem dolent. sed epistula mihi a uobis missa est, ut non inpudens esset epistula mea, cum occasione a uobis accepta idolorum cultoribus de Christo aliquid loqueretur. sed obsecro uos, si eum non inaniter in mea epistula nominastis, ut non inaniter uobis haec scripserim. si autem me inridere uoluistis, timete illum. quem prius iudicatum inrisit superbus orbis terrarum et nunc iudicem subiectus expectat; erit enim testis affectus in uos cordis mei per hanc, quantum potui, paginam expressus, erit testis uobis in iudicio eius, qui credentes sibi confirmaturus est et incredulos confusurus. deus unus et uerus uos ab omni huius saeculi uanitate liberatos conuertat ad se. domini praedicabiles et dilectissimi fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

Wake up at last, my brothers and my fellow citizens of Madaura; God has given me this occasion of writing to you. In the business of brother Florentius, by whom you sent your letter, I have been present and helped as far as I could, as God willed; but it was a business that could easily have been completed even without my help, for almost all the people of his house who are at Hippo know Florentius and greatly grieve at his bereavement. But a letter was sent me by you, so that my letter would not be impudent if, taking the occasion from you, it said something about Christ to worshipers of idols. But I beg you, if you did not name him in vain in your letter to me, let me not have written this to you in vain. But if you wished to mock me, fear him whom the proud world first mocked when he was judged, and now, subjected, awaits as judge. For the love of my heart toward you, expressed as far as I could in this page, will be a witness; it will be a witness against you at the judgment of him who will confirm those who believe in him and confound unbelievers. May the one true God free you from all the vanity of this world and turn you to himself, my praiseworthy lords and dearly beloved brothers.

### Translation notes

- “Parentes” here probably means fellow townsmen (Augustine studied at Madaura); possibly “kinsmen.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 232.7 (CSEL 57:516–517; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-232-7).

## Letter 233.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-233-1
- Source: CSEL 57:517–519
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the pagan Longinianus how he thinks God should be worshiped and whether Christ's way is the only way to the happy life.

### Latin text

Solere aiunt quendam ueterum dicere, quibus satis persuasum esset, ut nihil mallent se esse quam uiros bonos, his reliquam facilem esse doctrinam. hanc sententiam — nam, si rite recolo, Socratica est — longe antiquior prophetica iam praecesserat praecipiens hominibus breuiter et simul, non tantum ut se nihil malit esse quam bonum, uerum etiam unde fiat bonus: Diliges, inquit. dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et ex tota mente tua et: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. hoc cui persuasum esset, non ei reliquam facilem sed eam totam esse doctrinam dum taxat utilem ac salubrem. multae enim doctrinae sunt, si tamen doctrinae dicendae sunt, uel superfluae uel noxiae. ueterum libris Christus adtestans: In his, inquit, duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet et prophetae. proinde, quia mihi uideor inspexisse tamquam in speculo sermocinationis mecum tuae nihil te esse malle quam uirum bonum, deum, quo nihil est melius et unde humanus animus haurit, ut bonus sit, quonam modo colendum credas, audeo percontari; nam quod eum colendum credas, iam teneo. quaero etiam, quid de Christo sentias: quod enim eum non parui pendas, aduerti, sed utrum ea sola uia. quae ab illo demonstrata est, ad uitam beatam perueniri posse existimes et aliqua ex causa non eam neglegas ire, sed differas, an et aliam uel alias ad tam opimam et prae omnibus appetendam possessionem uias esse arbitreris et aliquam earum iam te ingredi credas, nosse cupio non, ut opinor, inpudenter; diligo enim te propter id, quod supra dixi, meque abs te diligi non temere existimo nec ulla de re alia inter eos, qui se beniuole nouerunt, sermo fructuosior uel inpenditur uel reposcitur uel accipitur uel recipitur quam, unde boni beatique simus.

### English translation (Claude)

They say one of the ancients used to say that for those who were fully persuaded that they wished to be nothing other than good men, the rest of learning was easy. This saying (for, if I recall correctly, it is Socratic) had long been preceded by a much more ancient prophetic one, which teaches men briefly and at once not only that one should wish to be nothing other than good, but also how one becomes good: “You shall love,” it says, “the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind,” and, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Whoever is persuaded of this has not the rest of learning easy, but has the whole of it, at least of what is useful and wholesome. For there are many teachings, if indeed they should be called teachings, either superfluous or harmful. Christ, bearing witness to the books of the ancients, says: “On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” Therefore, since I seem to have seen, as in a mirror of your conversation with me, that you wish to be nothing other than a good man, I venture to ask how you believe God, than whom nothing is better and from whom the human mind draws its goodness, is to be worshiped; for that you believe he is to be worshiped I already know. I also ask what you think of Christ. That you do not hold him cheap I have noticed; but I want to know, not, I think, impudently, whether you think the happy life can be reached by that way alone which he showed, and for some reason do not neglect but postpone going on it, or whether you think there is another way or ways to so rich a possession, desirable above all, and believe you are already entering on one of them. For I love you for the reason I gave above, and I think, not rashly, that I am loved by you; and among those who know each other with goodwill no conversation is more fruitful to spend, to ask for, to receive or to return than on how we may be good and happy.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37: quotation, high confidence
- Deut 6:5: quotation, medium confidence
- Lev 19:18: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 22:40: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Longinianus, a pagan (ca. 395). Quotations: Deut 6:5 / Matt 22:37; Lev 19:18; Matt 22:40.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 233.1 (CSEL 57:517–519; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-233-1).

## Letter 234.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-1
- Source: CSEL 57:519–520
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: The pagan Longinianus replies with elaborate compliments, appealing to Socratic, Orphic and Hermetic precepts, and calls Augustine a uniquely good man.

### Latin text

Beatus sum et relucentis puro uirtutis tuae lumine admodum inlustratus, qui dignum me diuini tui affaminis honore cumulandum esse duxisti. sed graue mihi onus et difficillimam respondendi prouinciam, domine uenerande, satis inponis praecipue tuis percontationibus et sub hoc tempore in talibus explicandis per meae opinionis sententiam, id est a pagano homine, quaestionibus si quidem abundet, quod ex parte uel iam dudum inter nos conuenerit uel nunc identidem litteris magis magisque conueniat praeceptis non dicam tantum Socraticis nec tuis, Romanorum uir uere optime. propheticis aut paucis Hierosolymiticis sed etiam Orpheicis atque Ageticis et Trimegisticis longe ante illis antiquioribus et paene rudibus adhuc saeculis diis auctoribus enatis et toti orbi terrae certis limitibus partitae trifariam diuinitus ostensis, priusquam nomen aut Europa caperet aut Asia acciperet aut Libya possideret uirum bonum, ut tu, medius fidius, et eris et fuisti, si quidem adhuc post hominum memoriam, nisi Xenophontis figmentum ut compositae fabulae schema concedas, adhuc audierim, legerim, uiderim neminem aut certe post unum nullum, quod deo teste bono periculo certoque dixerim, nisi te deum et coniti semper agnoscere et posse puritate animi corporisque proiecta grauedine sectari facillime et spe perfectae conscientiae non dubia credulitate tenere.

### English translation (Claude)

I am blessed and greatly illumined by the pure light of your shining virtue, since you have thought me worthy to be honored with your divine address. But you lay on me a heavy burden and a most difficult task of replying, venerable lord, especially by your questions, and at this time, in explaining such questions by the judgment of my opinion, that is, from a pagan man. For indeed it is abundantly clear what has partly long since been agreed between us, or is now again agreed more and more by letters: by precepts, I will not say only Socratic, nor yours, truly best of Romans, the prophetic or the few from Jerusalem, but also Orphic, Agetic and Trismegistic, born far earlier in those more ancient and almost still rude ages with the gods as their authors, and divinely shown to the whole world, divided into three by sure boundaries, before Europe took its name, or Asia received it, or Libya possessed it, that a good man, such as, by heaven, you will be and have been, unless you grant me Xenophon's fiction as the pattern of a composed story, I have still heard of, read of, seen no one since the memory of men, or certainly after one none (I say this with God as witness, safely and surely), except you, who strive always to acknowledge God, and are able most easily to follow him in purity of mind and body, the heaviness cast away, and to hold him in the hope of a perfect conscience with no doubtful belief.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Longinianus to Augustine. The Latin is highly mannered and in places obscure or corrupt in the digital text (e.g. coniti, Ageticis); translated by the probable sense. “Agetic” perhaps refers to Egyptian (Hageticis?) or Chaldean precepts; uncertain. “Trismegistic”: Hermes Trismegistus. “Xenophon's fiction”: probably the Cyropaedia's ideal ruler.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 234.1 (CSEL 57:519–520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-1).

## Letter 234.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-2
- Source: CSEL 57:520
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Longinianus says the way to God is a life of virtue with the help of the gods and purification by the ancient rites and abstinence.

### Latin text

Verum qua uia effici possit, magis est, ut tu non nescias et mihi non insinuato extrinsecus aliquo dissertes, quam ut a me, domine percolende, scias, quia tunc. fateor, huius boni in sedem profecturus sufficiens, ut mea expetunt sacerdotia. minime necdum et, si tamen potuero, uiaticum colligo. uerum quid traditum sancte atque antiquitus teneam atque custodiam, ut potuero, paucis edicam. uia est in deum melior, qua uir bonus piis, iustis, puris, castis, ueris dictis factisque sine ulla temporum mutatorum captata iactatione probatus et deorum comitatu uallatus dei utique potestatibus emeritis, id est eius unius et uniuersi et incomprehensibilis et ineffabilis infatigabilisque creatoris impletis uirtutibus, quod, ut uestrum est, angelos dicitis uel quid alterum post deum uel cum deo. aut a deo aut in deum intentione animi mentisque ire festinat. uia est, inquam. qua purgati antiquorum sacrorum piis praeceptis expiationibusque purissimis et abstemiis obseruationibus decocti anima et corpore constantes deproperant.

### English translation (Claude)

But by what way this can be accomplished, it is more fitting that you should not be ignorant of it and discourse on it to me, without anything brought in from outside, than that you should learn it from me, most esteemed lord, since, I confess, I am not yet sufficient to set out for the seat of this good, as my priesthoods require; I am still gathering provisions for the journey, if indeed I can. But what has been handed down holily and anciently, which I hold and guard as best I can, I will tell in a few words. The better way to God is that by which a good man, proved by pious, just, pure, chaste, true words and deeds without any boasting sought from changing times, and surrounded by the company of the gods, the powers of God having been earned, that is, the virtues of that one, universal, incomprehensible, ineffable and untiring Creator having been fulfilled, whom, as is your custom, you call angels, or something else after God or with God, either from God or toward God, hastens to go with the intention of soul and mind. It is the way, I say, by which those who are purified by the pious precepts of the ancient rites and by most pure expiations, and refined by abstinent observances, hasten on, steadfast in soul and body.

### Translation notes

- Longinianus was evidently a pagan priest (mea sacerdotia). The syntax of the second sentence is confused in the Latin; translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 234.2 (CSEL 57:520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-2).

## Letter 234.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-8
- Source: CSEL 57:520–521
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Longinianus declines to say what he thinks of Christ, since he does not know, and asks Augustine to instruct him by letter.

### Latin text

De Christo autem tuae iam credulitatis carnali et spiritus deo, per quem in illum summum, beatum, uerum et patrem omnium ire securus es, domine pater percolende, non audeo nec ualeo, quid sentiam, exprimere, quia, quod nescio, difficillimum credo definire. ut autem me cultorem tuarum uirtutum dignatus es iam olim scienti insinuare, quod diligas, satis ad bonae uitae testimonium habeo, quam cum, ne tibi displiceam, qui deo per te animamque tuam cotidie insinuas, custodio. intellegis procul dubio, quod et ego delectabiliter diligam, cum tui iudicii de me habiti normam lineamque accipiens teneam. sed ante omnia quaeso te, ut exiguissimae opinioni meae ueniam concedas et sermoni meo ad te, quia coegisti, remisso, forte incongruo facile indulgeas et me, quid de his existimes uel tu quid sentias, sanctis scriptis tuis, ut ille ait, iam non melle sed nectare dulcioribus, si mereor, informare digneris. dei pietate perfruaris, domine pater, ac perpetua sanctitate deo placeas, quod necesse est.

### English translation (Claude)

But about Christ, the God of the flesh and the spirit of your belief, through whom you are confident of going to that highest, blessed, true Father of all, most esteemed lord father, I do not dare and am not able to express what I think, because I believe it most difficult to define what I do not know. But as you once deigned to make known to me, the admirer of your virtues, what you love, I have enough as testimony of a good life, which I keep so as not to displease you, who daily commend yourself to God through yourself and your soul. You surely understand that I too love with delight, since I take and hold the rule and line of the judgment you have formed of me. But above all I ask you to grant pardon to my very slight opinion, and readily to indulge my speech to you, slack and perhaps unfitting, since you compelled it; and, if I deserve it, to deign to instruct me on what you think of these things, or what you feel, by your holy writings, sweeter, as someone says, no longer than honey but than nectar. May you enjoy the goodness of God, lord father, and please God with perpetual holiness, as must be.

### Translation notes

- The numbering jumps from 234.2 to 234.8 in the digital text (sections 3–7 are not printed there). The quoted phrase about honey and nectar is unidentified.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 234.8 (CSEL 57:520–521; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/231-1/#p-234-8).

## Letter 235.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-235-1
- Source: CSEL 57:521–522
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine welcomes Longinianus's reserve about Christ and asks him first to clarify his view of the ancient rites, quoting his letter back to him.

### Latin text

Cepi fructum scripti mei, rescriptum scilicet beniuolentiae tuae. unde iam uideo exortum et exorsum inter nos magnae ac de re magna disputationis quasi sementum. hoc est, quod uolebam prius; deinde quod adhuc uolo, deus adiuuabit; id autem est, ut hoc coeptum debito ac salubri fine claudatur. proinde, quod de Christo nihil temere tibi uel negandum uel adfirmandum putasti, hoc in pagani animo temperamentum non inuitus acceperim. quod uero etiam scriptis meis de hac re doceri te cupis, nequaquam abnuam neque desistam huic tam bonae mihique carissimae seruire uoluntati tuae. sed prius opus est eliquare quodam modo perspicuamque sumere sententiam tuam de antiquis sacris. cum enim dixisses eam uiam in deum esse meliorem, qua uir bonus piis, iustis. puris, castis. ueris dictis factisque sine ulla temporum mutatorum captata iactatione probatus et deorum comitatu uallatus dei utique potestatibus emeritis, id est eius unius et uniuersi et incomprehensibilis et infatigabilis infatigabilisque creatoris impletis uirtutibus, quod, ut uestrum est, angelos dicitis uel quid alterum post deum uel cum deo, aut a deo aut in deum intentione animi mentisque ire festinat, quae uerba ex epistula tua recognoscis, tum addidisti et aisti: Via est, inquam, qua purgati antiquorum sacrorum piis praeceptis expiationibusque purissimis et abstemiis obseruationibus decocti anima et corpore constantes deproperant.

### English translation (Claude)

I have gained the fruit of my letter, namely the reply of your goodwill. From it I now see that there has arisen and begun between us something like the seed of a great discussion about a great matter. This is what I wanted first; what I still want, God will help with: that is, that what has been begun may be brought to its due and wholesome end. So I accept, not unwillingly, this restraint in a pagan's mind, that you thought you should neither rashly deny nor affirm anything about Christ. And as for your wish to be taught by my writings about this, I will by no means refuse, nor will I cease to serve this good will of yours, very dear to me. But first it is necessary in some way to clarify and grasp plainly your view of the ancient rites. For when you had said that the better way to God is that by which a good man, “proved by pious, just, pure, chaste, true words and deeds without any boasting sought from changing times, and surrounded by the company of the gods, the powers of God having been earned, that is, the virtues of that one, universal, incomprehensible, untiring Creator having been fulfilled, whom, as is your custom, you call angels, or something else after God or with God, either from God or toward God, hastens to go with the intention of soul and mind” (you recognize these words from your letter), you then added: “It is the way, I say, by which those who are purified by the pious precepts of the ancient rites and by most pure expiations, and refined by abstinent observances, hasten on, steadfast in soul and body.”

### Translation notes

- Augustine to Longinianus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 235.1 (CSEL 57:521–522; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-235-1).

## Letter 235.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-235-2
- Source: CSEL 57:522–523
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Longinianus whether the ancient rites purify the good life, produce it, complete it, or form part of it.

### Latin text

In his uerbis sentio. ni fallor, uideri tibi non sufficere ad uiam, qua itur in deum, ut uir bonus piis, iustis, puris, castis, ueris dictis factisque promereatur deos. quorum comitatu uallatus in illum summum deum omnium creatorem ire festinet, nisi etiam sacrorum antiquorum piis praeceptis expiationibusque purgetur. quam ob rem uelim scire, quid arbitreris esse per sacra purgandum in eo, qui pie, iuste, pure ueraciterque uiuendo promeretur deos et per eos unum illum deorum deum. si enim adhuc sacris purgandus est, utique mundus non est et, si mundus non est, pie, iuste, pure casteque non uiuit. si autem iam ita uiuit, iam mundus est. porro iam mundum atque purum quid opus est sacris expiando purgari? itaque hic nodus est disputationis nostrae, quo soluto consequentia uidebimus: uiuatne homo bene, ut sacris purgetur, an sacris purgetur, ut bene uiuat, an ipse quantuscumque bene uiuendi in homine modus nondum sit idoneus ad beatam uitam, quae ex deo capitur, nisi accedant adiumenta sacrorum, an bene uiuendi quaedam uelut portio sit etiam sacra percipere. ut scilicet non aliud sit bene uiuere aliud sacrate uiuere, sed bene uiuendi terminis etiam sacrata uita claudatur. horum quattuor, quae proposui, quid potissimum probes, quaeso te litteris aperire non pigeat. plurimum quippe interest ad id, quod suscepimus inter nos conloquendo peragere, ne, cum multa non necessaria, tamquam ea sentias, quae forte non sentis, refellere molior, tempus necessarium in superfluis insumatur. onerare itaque epistulam nolui, ut te cito rescribente cetera contexamus.

### English translation (Claude)

In these words I sense, unless I am mistaken, that you think it is not enough for the way by which one goes to God that a good man, by pious, just, pure, chaste, true words and deeds, should earn the favor of the gods, so that, surrounded by their company, he may hasten to go to that highest God, Creator of all, unless he is also purified by the pious precepts and expiations of the ancient rites. Therefore I would like to know what you think must be purified by rites in one who, by living piously, justly, purely and truthfully, earns the favor of the gods and through them of that one God of gods. For if he still has to be purified by rites, he is certainly not clean; and if he is not clean, he does not live piously, justly, purely and chastely. But if he already lives so, he is already clean. And what need is there for one already clean and pure to be purified by expiating rites? So here is the knot of our discussion; when it is untied, we will see what follows: whether a man lives well in order to be purified by rites, or is purified by rites in order to live well; or whether the measure of good living in a man, however great, is not yet fit for the happy life that is received from God unless the aids of the rites are added; or whether receiving the rites is itself, as it were, a part of living well, so that living well is not one thing and living by the rites another, but the life of the rites is included within the bounds of good living. Which of these four I have proposed you most approve, please do not mind disclosing by letter. For it matters greatly for what we have undertaken to carry through in conversation with each other that, while I try to refute many unnecessary things as if you held views you perhaps do not hold, necessary time should not be spent on superfluous things. So I did not want to burden the letter, so that when you reply quickly we may weave together the rest.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 235.2 (CSEL 57:522–523; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-235-2).

## Letter 236.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-1
- Source: CSEL 57:523–524
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine informs Bishop Deuterius that Victorinus, an aged subdeacon of Malliana, has confessed to being a Manichaean Hearer.

### Latin text

Nihil melius me facere posse arbitratus sum. quam ut tuae sanctitati potissimum scriberem, ne per neglegentiam in uestra prouincia domini nostri Iesu Christi ouile uastet inimicus, qui non desinit insidiari, ut perdat animas tam magno pretio comparatas. Mallianensem quendam subdiaconum Victorinum apud nos constitit esse Manichaeum et in tam sacrilego errore sub nomine clerici latitabat; nam est etiam aetate iam senex. ita est autem manifestatus, ut etiam ipse a me interrogatus. antequam a testibus coargueretur, negare non posset. tot enim et tales iam esse sciebat, quibus se incautus effuderat. ut nihil aliud, si negare temptaret, quam non dico inpudentissimus sed insanissimus appareret. auditorem sane Manichaeorum, non electum se esse confessus est.

### English translation (Claude)

I thought I could do nothing better than to write to Your Holiness above all, so that the enemy, who never stops lying in wait to destroy souls bought at so great a price, may not through negligence lay waste the sheepfold of our Lord Jesus Christ in your province. A certain subdeacon of Malliana, Victorinus, has been proved among us to be a Manichee, and in so sacrilegious an error he was hiding under the name of a cleric; and he is already an old man in age. He was so exposed that, when questioned by me, even before he was convicted by witnesses, he could not deny it; for he knew there were already so many, and such people, to whom he had incautiously poured himself out, that if he tried to deny it he would appear, I will not say most shameless, but quite insane. He confessed, however, that he was a Hearer of the Manichees, not one of the Elect.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 6:20: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Deuterius, bishop of Caesarea in Mauretania. Allusion: 1 Cor 6:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 236.1 (CSEL 57:523–524; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-1).

## Letter 236.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-2
- Source: CSEL 57:524–525
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes Manichaean Hearers and Elect and their doctrines: docetism, rejection of the Old Testament, the soul as part of God, and God's mixture with darkness.

### Latin text

Auditores autem qui appellantur apud eos, et carnibus uescuntur et agros colunt et, si uoluerint, uxores habent. quorum nihil faciunt, qui electi uocantur. sed ipsi auditores ante electos genua figunt, ut eis manus supplicibus inponatur non a solis presbyteris uel episcopis aut diaconis eorum sed a quibuslibet electis. solem etiam et lunam cum eis adorant et orant. die quoque dominico cum illis ieiunant et omnes blasphemias cum illis credunt, quibus Manichaeorum haeresis detestanda est, negantes scilicet Christum natum esse de uirgine nec eius carnem ueram confitentes fuisse sed falsam ac per hoc et falsam eius passionem et nullam resurrectionem fuisse contendunt. patriarchas prophetasque blasphemant. legem per famulum dei Moysen datam non a uero deo dicunt sed a principe tenebrarum. animas non solum hominum sed etiam pecorum de dei esse substantia et omnino partes dei esse arbitrantur. deum denique bonum et uerum dicunt cum tenebrarum gente pugnasse et partem suam tenebrarum principibus miscuisse eamque toto mundo inquinatam et ligatam per cibos electorum suorum et per solem ac lunam purgari adseuerant et, quod purgari de ipsa dei parte non potuerit, in fine saeculi aeterno ac poenali uinculo conligari, ut non solum uiolabilis et corruptibilis et contaminabilis credatur deus, cuius pars potuit ad mala tanta perduci, sed non possit saltem totus a tanta coinquinatione et inmunditia et miseria uel in saeculi fine purgari.

### English translation (Claude)

Those who among them are called Hearers both eat meat and till the fields and, if they wish, have wives; none of which those called the Elect do. But the Hearers themselves kneel before the Elect, so that hands may be laid on them as suppliants, not only by their presbyters or bishops or deacons but by any of the Elect. They also worship and pray to the sun and moon with them. They fast with them on the Lord's day too, and believe with them all the blasphemies for which the Manichaean heresy is to be detested: denying that Christ was born of a virgin, not confessing that his flesh was real but false, and therefore contending that his passion too was false and that there was no resurrection. They blaspheme the patriarchs and prophets. They say the law given through God's servant Moses was not from the true God but from the prince of darkness. They think that the souls not only of men but even of beasts are of God's substance and altogether parts of God. Finally they say that the good and true God fought with the race of darkness and mixed part of himself with the princes of darkness, and they assert that this part, defiled and bound throughout the whole world, is purified by the food of their Elect and by the sun and moon; and that what of this very part of God could not be purified is bound at the end of the world in an eternal and penal bond: so that God is believed not only to be violable, corruptible and capable of defilement, since part of him could be brought to such evils, but also unable to be purified wholly from such defilement, uncleanness and misery even at the end of the world.

### Translation notes

- Augustine's description of Manichaean teaching, as he understood it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 236.2 (CSEL 57:524–525; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-2).

## Letter 236.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-3
- Source: CSEL 57:525–526
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Deuterius to depose Victorinus from clerical rank and to admit him to penance only if he names other Manichees in the province.

### Latin text

Has cum illis intolerabiles blasphemias subdiaconus iste quasi catholicus non solum credebat, sed, quibus uiribus poterat, et docebat. nam docens patefactus est, cum se quasi discentibus credidit. rogauit me quidem, postea quam se Manichaeorum auditorem esse confessus est, ut eum in uiam ueritatis doctrinae catholicae reuocarem, sed, fateor, eius fictionem sub clerici specie uehementer exhorrui eumque coercitum pellendum de ciuitate curaui. nec mihi hoc satis fuit, nisi et tuae sanctitati t etenim meis litteris intimarem, ut a clericorum gradu congrue ecclesiastica seueritate deiectus cauendus omnibus innotescat. petenti autem paenitentiae locum tunc credatur, si et alios, quos illic nouit esse, manifestauerit nobis non solum Mallianae sed in ipsa omnino prouincia.

### English translation (Claude)

These intolerable blasphemies this subdeacon, as though a Catholic, not only believed with them but also taught with what strength he could; for he was discovered while teaching, when he trusted himself to people he took for learners. After he confessed that he was a Hearer of the Manichees, he did ask me to call him back to the way of the truth of Catholic doctrine; but, I confess, I was deeply horrified at his pretense under the guise of a cleric, and I had him restrained and arranged for him to be expelled from the city. Nor was this enough for me unless I also informed Your Holiness by my letter, so that, deposed from the clerical rank with fitting church severity, he may become known to all as one to be avoided. But when he asks for a place of penance, let him be believed then, if he also discloses to us the others he knows to be there, not only at Malliana but in the whole province.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 236.3 (CSEL 57:525–526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-236-3).

## Letter 237.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-1
- Source: CSEL 57:526
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Bishop Ceretius that the writings he sent are Priscillianist and that Argyrius either met them unawares or is caught in the heresy.

### Latin text

Lectis his, quae misit sanctitas tua, uidetur mihi Argyrius in Priscillianistas aut nesciens inruisse. ita ut omnino, utrum ipsi essent Priscillianistae, ignoraret, aut iam eiusdem haeresis retibus implicatus. nam scripturas illas Priscillianistarum esse non dubito. uix autem mihi uacare utcumque potuit aliis atque aliis sine intermissione necessitatibus superantibus, ut unus mihi saltem totus ex duobus ipsis codicibus legeretur. nescio quo enim modo alius aberrauit et diligentissime inter nostros requisitus nullo modo potuit inueniri, domine beatissime et merito uenerabilis pater.

### English translation (Claude)

Having read what Your Holiness sent, it seems to me that Argyrius either fell upon the Priscillianists unawares, so that he did not know at all whether they were Priscillianists, or is already entangled in the nets of that heresy. For I do not doubt that those writings are the Priscillianists'. But, with one necessity after another pressing on me without a break, I could barely find leisure to have even one of the two volumes read through to me entire; for somehow the other went astray and, though searched for most diligently among our people, could in no way be found, my most blessed lord and justly venerable father.

### Translation notes

- To Ceretius, a bishop (probably of Grenoble).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.1 (CSEL 57:526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-1).

## Letter 237.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-2
- Source: CSEL 57:526–527
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the hymn ascribed to Christ comes from apocrypha shared by several heresies, which reject the Old Testament and parts of the New, as Manichees reject Acts.

### Latin text

Hymnus sane, quem dicunt esse domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui maxime permouit uenerationem tuam, in scripturis solet apocryphis inueniri. quae non propriae Priscillianistarum sunt. sed alii quoque haeretici eis nonnullarum sectarum impietate uanitatis utuntur inter se quidem diuersa sentientes. unde suas quisque uarias haereses sunt secuti, sed scripturas istas habent in sua diuersitate communes easque illi praecipue frequentare adsolent, qui legem ueterem et prophetas canonicos non accipiunt. negant enim haec ad deum bonum et ad Christum eius filium pertinere sicut Manichaei. sicut Marcionistae et ceteri, quibus haec blasphemia damnabilis placuit. qui etiam in scripturis canonicis testamenti noui, hoc est in ueris euangelicis et apostolicis litteris non accipiunt omnia, sed quod uolunt, et libros eligunt, quos accipiant. aliis inprobatis. sed et in singulis quibusque libris loca distinguunt, quae putantur suis erroribus conuenire: cetera in eis pro falsis habent. nam quidam Manichaei canonicum librum, cuius titulus est actus apostolorum, repudiant. timent enim euidentissimam ueritatem. ubi apparet sanctus spiritus missus, qui est a domino Iesu Christo in euangelica ueritate promissus. sub eius quippe spiritus nomine. a quo penitus alieni sunt, indocta hominum corda decipiunt mira caecitate adserentes eandem domini promissionem in suo haeresiarcha Manichaeo esse completam. quod et illi haeretici faciunt, qui uocantur Cataphryges, dicentes per nescio quos insanos, Montanum scilicet et Priscillam, quos et proprios suos prophetas habent, uenisse spiritum sanctum, quem dominus missurum se esse promisit.

### English translation (Claude)

The hymn which they say is our Lord Jesus Christ's, which most disturbed Your Reverence, is usually found in apocryphal writings, which are not peculiar to the Priscillianists; other heretics too use them with the impious vanity of several sects, although they differ among themselves. So each followed his own different heresy, but they hold these writings in common amid their diversity, and those who do not accept the Old Law and the canonical prophets are especially accustomed to use them. For they deny that these belong to the good God and to Christ his Son, like the Manichees, like the Marcionites and the others who have favored this damnable blasphemy. Even in the canonical Scriptures of the New Testament, that is, in the true Gospel and apostolic writings, they do not accept everything, but what they wish; they choose which books to accept and reject others. And in each book they mark off the passages they think agree with their errors and hold the rest as false. For some Manichees reject the canonical book entitled the Acts of the Apostles. They fear its most evident truth, where the Holy Spirit appears sent, who was promised by the Lord Jesus Christ in the truth of the Gospel. For under the name of this Spirit, from whom they are utterly estranged, they deceive untaught human hearts, asserting with wonderful blindness that this promise of the Lord was fulfilled in their heresiarch Mani. The heretics called Cataphrygians do the same, saying that through some madmen, Montanus and Priscilla, whom they hold as their own prophets, the Holy Spirit came whom the Lord promised to send.

### Scripture references

- John 14:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The hymn is the Hymn of Jesus found in the Acts of John (94–96). Allusion: John 14:16, 26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.2 (CSEL 57:526–527; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-2).

## Letter 237.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-3
- Source: CSEL 57:527–528
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the Priscillianists accept all scriptures but twist them, hide their real teaching, and even have a precept permitting perjury to keep it secret.

### Latin text

Priscillianistae uero accipiunt omnia et canonica et apocrypha simul; sed quaecumque, quae contra eos sunt, in suae peruersitatis sensus aliquando callida et astuta aliquando ridicula et hebeti expositione peruertunt nec saltem ita, ut ea ipsa, quae exponunt ab suae sectae hominibus alienis, uera esse credant. alioquin aut catholici essent aut non multum a ueritate alieni. qui et in ipsis scripturis apocryphis sensus catholicos inuenirent aut inuenire uelle uiderentur, sed, cum ipsi alia cum suis sentiant atque inter suos doceant siue discant, quae non audent prodere, quoniam re uera nefaria sunt et detestanda, tamen fidem catholicam eis, quos timent, praedicant, non quam teneant, sed sub qua lateant. possunt enim aliqui haeretici reperiri fortasse inmundiores, sed nullus istis fallacia comparatur. alii quippe, ut sunt hominum uitia, de huius uitae consuetudine uel infirmitate men an autem in ipsa nefaria doctrina haeresis suae praeceptum habere perhibentur. ut occultandorum dogmatum suorum causa etiam cum falsa iuratione mentiantur. hi, qui eos experti sunt et ipsorum fuerant atque ab eis dei misericordia liberati sunt, etiam uerba ipsa praecepti huius ista commemorant: Iura, periura, secretum prodere noli.

### English translation (Claude)

The Priscillianists, however, accept everything, canonical and apocryphal alike; but whatever is against them they twist into the sense of their perversity, sometimes by a cunning and crafty interpretation, sometimes by a ridiculous and dull one; and not even so that they themselves believe true the very interpretations they give to people outside their sect. Otherwise they would either be Catholics or not far from the truth, if they found Catholic meanings even in the apocryphal writings, or seemed to wish to find them. But since they think other things with their own people and teach or learn among themselves things they do not dare to divulge, because they are truly wicked and detestable, they nevertheless preach the Catholic faith to those they fear, not a faith they hold but one under which they hide. For perhaps some more unclean heretics can be found, but none is comparable to these in deceit. For other heretics, as human failings go, lie out of the habit or weakness of this life; but these are said to have, in the wicked doctrine of their heresy itself, a precept to lie even with false oaths in order to conceal their tenets. Those who have had experience of them, who were once their members and were freed from them by God's mercy, even recall the very words of this precept: “Swear, forswear, do not betray the secret.”

### Translation notes

- The digital text is defective at “men an autem”; translated by the evident sense (“lie …; but these”). The Priscillianist maxim is reported by Augustine from former members.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.3 (CSEL 57:527–528; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-3).

## Letter 237.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-4
- Source: CSEL 57:528
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refutes the Priscillianist claim that the hymn was kept out of the canon to hide it from carnal men, which implies the canon itself is unspiritual.

### Latin text

Proinde, ut sine ulla difficultate uideatur, quam non hoc sentiunt de scripturis apocryphis, quod se exponere simulant, ratio consideranda est, quam reddere uidentur. ut eisdem scripturis tamquam diuina tribuatur auctoritas, ut, quod scelestius est, etiam canonicis praeferant. habes uerba eorum in illo codice ita posita: Hymnus domini, quem dixit secrete sanctis apostolis discipulis suis, quia scriptum est in euangelio: Hymno dicto ascendit in montem, et quod in canone non est positus propter eos. qui secundum se sentiunt et non secundum spiritum et ueritatem dei. et quia scriptum est: Sacramentum regis bonum est abscondere, opera autem dei reuelare honorificum est. ista est magna eorum ratio, cur iste hymnus non sit in canone, quia uelut sacramentum regis abscondendum fuit his, qui secundum carnem sentiunt et non secundum spiritum et ueritatem dei. ergo scripturae canonicae non pertinent ad sacramentum regis, quod istis abscondendum uidetur, et eis conscriptae sunt. qui secundum carnem sentiunt et non secundum spiritum et ueritatem dei. quod quid est aliud quam dicere scripturas sanctas canonicas nec secundum spiritum dei sapere nec pertinere ad ueritatem dei? quis hoc audiat? quis ualeat sustinere tantae impietatis horrorem? aut si scripturae canonicae spiritaliter a spiritalibus carnaliter a carnalibus sentiuntur, cur non est et iste hymnus in canone, si et ipsum spiritales spiritaliter carnales carnaliter sentiunt?

### English translation (Claude)

Therefore, so that it may be seen without any difficulty that they do not think about the apocryphal writings what they pretend to set forth, we must consider the reason they seem to give for ascribing divine authority to those writings, and, what is more wicked, even preferring them to the canonical ones. You have their words set down in that volume as follows: “The hymn of the Lord, which he spoke in secret to the holy apostles his disciples, because it is written in the Gospel, ‘When the hymn had been said, he went up the mountain’; and it was not placed in the canon because of those who think according to themselves and not according to the Spirit and the truth of God; and because it is written, ‘It is good to hide the sacrament of a king, but it is honorable to reveal the works of God.’” This is their great reason why this hymn is not in the canon: that, as the sacrament of the king, it had to be hidden from those who think according to the flesh and not according to the Spirit and the truth of God. Therefore the canonical Scriptures do not concern the sacrament of the king, which they think must be hidden, and were written for those who think according to the flesh and not according to the Spirit and the truth of God. What is this but to say that the holy canonical Scriptures neither savor according to the Spirit of God nor belong to the truth of God? Who would listen to this? Who could bear the horror of such impiety? Or, if the canonical Scriptures are understood spiritually by the spiritual and carnally by the carnal, why is this hymn not also in the canon, if the spiritual understand it too spiritually and the carnal carnally?

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:30: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 12:7 (Tobit): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quoted within the Priscillianist text: Matt 26:30 (Mark 14:26); Tob 12:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.4 (CSEL 57:528; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-4).

## Letter 237.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-5
- Source: CSEL 57:528–529
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that the Priscillianists explain the hymn's “I wish to loose and be loosed” from canonical texts, so the hymn's supposed secret is already open in the canon.

### Latin text

Deinde quid causae est, ut eundem hymnum isti secundum scripturas canonicas conentur exponere? si enim propterea non est in scripturis canonicis. quia illae scripturae carnalibus hymnus autem iste spiritalibus scriptus est, quo modo de scripturis ad carnales homines pertinentibus exponitur hymnus, qui non pertinet ad carnales? si enim uerbi gratia propterea in isto hymno cantatur et dicitur: Soluere uolo et solui uolo’. quia, sicut isti haec uerba exponunt, soluit nos dominus Christus a conuersatione saeculi. ut non iterum ligemur in eo, haec in scripturis canonicis utique didicimus, quod soluat nos dominus a conuersatione saeculi et quia in eo non debemus iterum conligari. nam quid est aliud: Dirupisti uincula mea? quid est aliud: Dominus soluit compeditos? iam solutos autem apostolus admonet dicens: State ergo et ne iterum seruitutis iugo detineamini et apostolus Petrus dicit: Si enim refugientes coinquinationes mundi in cognitione domini nostri et saluatoris Iesu Christi his rursus impliciti superantur, facta sunt eis posteriora deteriora prioribus sic ostendens, cum soluti fuerimus, alligari nos mundo iterum non debere. cum itaque ista in canone sine ex his testimoniis. quae commemoraui. siue ex aliis plurimis manifesta sint et legi et praedicari non cessent, quid est, quod isti hunc hymnum, ubi ‛uerba’, ut secundum ipsos loquar. uerba obscurissime sunt posita, propterea dicunt in canone non esse, ne reuelarentur carnalibus, cum potius et uideamus in canone reuelata, in hoc autem hymno omnino uelata, sicut ipsi adserunt? nam, sicut magis credendum est, prorsus non sunt ipsa sed nescio quae alia. quae tali expositione multo amplius uelant et reuelare formidant..

### English translation (Claude)

Then what reason is there for them to try to explain this same hymn according to the canonical Scriptures? For if it is not in the canonical Scriptures because those Scriptures were written for the carnal and this hymn for the spiritual, how is a hymn that does not concern the carnal explained from Scriptures that concern carnal men? For if, for example, it is sung and said in this hymn, “I wish to loose and I wish to be loosed,” because, as they explain these words, the Lord Christ looses us from the way of life of the world, so that we are not bound in it again, this we have certainly learned in the canonical Scriptures: that the Lord looses us from the way of life of the world and that we ought not to be bound in it again. For what else is “You have broken my bonds”? What else is “The Lord looses the fettered”? And the apostle admonishes those already loosed, saying, “Stand fast, therefore, and do not be held again by the yoke of slavery”; and the apostle Peter says, “For if, having fled the defilements of the world in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first,” showing thus that, once loosed, we ought not to be bound to the world again. Since, then, these things are plain in the canon, from the testimonies I have mentioned and from very many others, and never cease to be read and preached, why do they say that this hymn, where, to speak as they do, the words are set down very obscurely, is not in the canon so that it might not be revealed to the carnal, when rather we see things revealed in the canon and in this hymn altogether veiled, as they themselves assert? For, as is more to be believed, the meanings are not these at all but some others, which by such an explanation they veil far more and are afraid to reveal.

### Scripture references

- Ps 116:16 (115:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 146:7 (145:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Gal 5:1: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Pet 2:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The hymn line is from the Acts of John 95. Quotations: Ps 116:16 (LXX 115:7); Ps 146:7 (LXX 145:7); Gal 5:1; 2 Pet 2:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.5 (CSEL 57:528–529; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-5).

## Letter 237.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-6
- Source: CSEL 57:529–530
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine continues that the Priscillianist interpretations of the hymn do not fit its words and are in any case already plain in Scripture.

### Latin text

Nam utique. si hoc illis uerbis significatur, quod nos soluit dominus a conuersatione saeculi et ut non iterum eo, non diceretur: Soluere uolo et solui uolo sed: Soluere uolo et eos. quos soluero, ligari uolo. aut si membra sua, id est fideles suos in se transfigurat, quem ad modum ait: Esuriui et dedistis mihi manducare, diceret potius: Solui uolo et ligari nolo’. aut si propterea ipse soluit et ipse soluitur, quia soluit caput, membra soluuntur, quae persequebatur, cui clamauit de caelo: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? — hoc quidem uerborum istorum expositor iste non dixit, sed etiam si dixisset, id ei respondemus, quod paulo ante respondimus, quoniam haec in scripturis canonicis legimus. ibi intellegimus, inde firmamus, inde cotidie praedicamus. quid est igitur, quod iste hymnus dicitur carnalibus fuisse subtractus, ut non poneretur in canone, cum, quod in illo opertum est, in canone apertum sit? an usque adeo desipiunt. immo insaniunt, ut audeant dicere sacramentum regis in hoc hymno absconditum esse spiritalibus, in canone autem manifestum esse carnalibus?

### English translation (Claude)

For surely, if what is meant by those words is that the Lord looses us from the way of life of the world, and that we are not bound in it again, it would not be said, “I wish to loose and I wish to be loosed,” but, “I wish to loose, and I wish those whom I have loosed not to be bound.” Or if he transfers his members, that is, his faithful, into himself, as when he says, “I was hungry and you gave me to eat,” he would rather say, “I wish to be loosed and not to be bound.” Or if he both looses and is loosed because the head looses and the members are loosed, the members that the one persecuted to whom he cried from heaven, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”, this indeed the interpreter of these words did not say; but even if he had said it, we answer him what we answered a little before: that we read these things in the canonical Scriptures, understand them there, confirm them from there, and preach them from there daily. Why then is this hymn said to have been withheld from the carnal, so as not to be placed in the canon, when what is covered in it is uncovered in the canon? Or are they so foolish, or rather mad, as to dare to say that the sacrament of the king is hidden from the spiritual in this hymn but manifest to the carnal in the canon?

### Scripture references

- Matt 25:35: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 9:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- A word is missing in the digital text (“that we are not [bound in it] again”); supplied by sense. Quotations: Matt 25:35; Acts 9:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.6 (CSEL 57:529–530; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-6).

## Letter 237.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-7
- Source: CSEL 57:530–531
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine shows that the hymn's “I wish to save and be saved,” as the Priscillianists explain it of baptism, is clearly taught in canonical Scripture.

### Latin text

Hoc et de superioribus eiusdem hymni uerbis dici potest. ubi ait: ‛Saluare uolo et saluari uolo. si enim, sicut ipsi exponunt, hoc ista uerba significant, quod saluamur a domino per baptismum et saluamus, id est custodimus in nobis spiritum datum nobis per baptismum, nonne istum sensum scriptura canonica clamat, ubi legimus: Saluos nos fecit per lauacrum regenerationis et ubi nobis dicitur: Spiritum nolite extinguere? quo modo ergo iste hymnus in canone ideo non est, ne carnalibus innotescat, cum id, quod in illo obscurum est, in canone luceat. nisi quia sub hac qualicumque expositione, quam quibuslibet aliis obtendunt, illud, quod hic ipsi sapiunt, occultare conantur? qui tamen usque adeo caeci sunt, ut etiam quaedam uerba de ipso canone adhibeant ad exponendum hymnum, quem propterea dicunt in canone non esse, ne sacramentum regis carnalibus proderetur. quid ergo faciunt in canone clarius posita, per quae in isto hymno aperiantur obscura?

### English translation (Claude)

The same can be said of the earlier words of the same hymn, where it says, “I wish to save and I wish to be saved.” For if, as they explain, these words mean that we are saved by the Lord through baptism and that we save, that is, keep in ourselves, the Spirit given us through baptism, does not canonical Scripture proclaim this sense, where we read, “He saved us by the washing of regeneration,” and where we are told, “Do not quench the Spirit”? How, then, is this hymn not in the canon so that it may not become known to the carnal, when what is obscure in it shines in the canon, unless it is that under this explanation, such as it is, which they hold out to any outsiders, they try to hide what they themselves understand here? Yet they are so blind that they even bring in certain words from the canon itself to explain the hymn, which they say is not in the canon lest the sacrament of the king be betrayed to the carnal. What, then, are they doing with things set more clearly in the canon, through which the obscure things in this hymn are opened?

### Scripture references

- Titus 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Titus 3:5; 1 Thess 5:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.7 (CSEL 57:530–531; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-7).

## Letter 237.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-8
- Source: CSEL 57:531–532
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine lists further lines of the hymn and the canonical texts the Priscillianists use to explain them, concluding that their explanations are a cover for hidden doctrines.

### Latin text

Nam si hoc, ut dicunt, intellegendum est in isto hymno, ubi ait: ‛Generari uolo’, quod in canonica epistula Pauli apostoli scriptum est: Quos iterum parturio, donec Christus formetur in uobis; si hoc intellegendum est in isto hymno, ubi ait: Cantare uolo quod in psalmo canonico scriptum est: Cantate domino canticum nouum; si hoc intellegendum est in isto hymno, ubi ait: Saltate cuncti. quod scriptum est in cantico euangelico: Cantauimus uobis et non saltastis: si hoc intellegendum est in isto hymno: Plangere uolo, tundite uos omnes, quod scriptum in cantico euangelico: Planximus uobis et non luxistis; si ‛ornare uolo et ornari uolo hoc significat in isto hymno, quod scriptum est in canone: Habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus uestris et: Vos estis templum dei et spiritus dei habitat in uobis; si, quod ait in isto hymno: Lucerna sum tibi, ille qui me uides, hoc significat, quod scriptum est in psalmo canonico: In lumine tuo uidebimus lumen; si, quod ait in isto hymno: Ianua sum tibi, quicumque me pulsas, hoc significat, quod in psalmo canonico legitur: Aperite mihi portas iustitiae, ingressus in eis confitebor domino et in alio psalmo: Tollite portas principes uestri et eleuamini portae aeternales et introibit rex gloriae; si, quod ait in isto hymno: ‛Qui uides, quod ago, tace opera mea, hoc significat, quod scriptum est in libro Tobiae: Sacramentum regis bonum est abscondere. cur iste hymnus non esse in canone propterea dicitur, ut sacramentum regis abscondatur carnalibus, cum ea, quae in isto hymno exponuntur, etiam in canone legantur et sic ibi reperiantur manifesta, ut per haec illa exponantur obscura, nisi quia istas expositiones habent, in quibus lateant, in uerbis uero illius hymni. quem exponere se simulant, hoc sapiunt, quod alienis exponere timeant?

### English translation (Claude)

For if, as they say, where the hymn says, “I wish to be begotten,” we are to understand what is written in the canonical letter of the apostle Paul, “whom I am again in labor with until Christ is formed in you”; if, where the hymn says, “I wish to sing,” we are to understand what is written in a canonical psalm, “Sing to the Lord a new song”; if, where it says, “Dance, all of you,” we are to understand what is written in the Gospel canticle, “We sang to you and you did not dance”; if, by “I wish to lament; beat your breasts, all of you,” we are to understand what is written in the Gospel canticle, “We lamented to you and you did not mourn”; if “I wish to adorn and I wish to be adorned” means in this hymn what is written in the canon, “that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith,” and, “You are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you”; if what it says in this hymn, “I am a lamp to you who see me,” means what is written in a canonical psalm, “In your light we shall see light”; if what it says in this hymn, “I am a door to you, whoever knocks at me,” means what is read in a canonical psalm, “Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will go in through them and give thanks to the Lord,” and in another psalm, “Lift up your gates, you princes, and be lifted up, eternal gates, and the King of glory shall come in”; if what it says in this hymn, “You who see what I do, keep silent about my works,” means what is written in the book of Tobit, “It is good to hide the sacrament of a king”: why is this hymn said not to be in the canon so that the sacrament of the king may be hidden from the carnal, when the things explained in this hymn are also read in the canon, and are found so manifest there that by them those obscure things are explained, unless it is that they have these explanations to hide in, while in the words of that hymn, which they pretend to explain, they understand something they fear to explain to outsiders?

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:19: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:17: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:16: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 36:9 (35:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 118:19 (117:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 24:7 (23:7 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Tob 12:7 (Tobit): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Hymn lines from the Acts of John 95. Quotations: Gal 4:19; Ps 96:1 (LXX 95:1); Matt 11:17; Eph 3:17; 1 Cor 3:16; Ps 36:9 (LXX 35:10); Ps 118:19 (LXX 117:19); Ps 24:7 (LXX 23:7); Tob 12:7.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.8 (CSEL 57:531–532; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-8).

## Letter 237.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-9
- Source: CSEL 57:532–533
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that the Priscillianist explanations are an evasion, condemns the hymn's line making Christ a mocker, and urges Ceretius to heal the sheep they have wounded.

### Latin text

Longum est cuncta disputando monstrare. uerum ex his, quae diximus, cetera considerare facillimum est et uidere ea, quae in expositione huius hymni bona et honesta dicunt. etiam in canone reperiri. unde illa eorum non ratio sed tergiuersatio est, ideo illum esse a canone separatum, quia carnalibus hominibus abscondendum regis fuerat sacramentum. unde non inmerito creduntur istis expositionibus non aperire uelle, quod legunt, sed potius operire, quod sentiunt. nec mirum, quando quidem ipsum dominum Iesum loquentem non per ora prophetarum uel apostolorum uel angelorum sed per os proprium illusorem potius quam ueritatis doctorem fuisse crediderunt. huic utique hymno diuinam tribuentes auctoritatem, ubi eum dixisse nescio quis eiusdem hymni conditor finxit: Verbo inlusi cuncta et non sum lusus in totum, respondeant, si possunt, egregii spiritales, quo eamus, cui aures aperiamus, cui loquenti utcumque credamus, in cuius promissione spem ponamus, si uerbo cuncta Christus inlusit, si uerbo cuncta omnipotens magister inlusit, si uerbo cuncta ille, qui est unigenitus. uerbum dei patris inlusit. quid ulterius loquar de perditis. uaniloquis et mentis seductoribus primum suae deinde ceterorum, quos sibi ad interitum praedestinatos aeternum consociare potuerunt? rescripsi uenerationi tuae et multo serius, quam uolueram, et plura, quam disposueram. optime facitis uigilanter lupos cauere; sed etiam pro sanandis ouibus, si quas forte uiolauerint siue iam uulnerauerint, pastorali diligentia ipso adiuuante pastorum domino laborate.

### English translation (Claude)

It would take long to show everything by argument. But from what we have said it is very easy to consider the rest and to see that the good and honorable things they say in explaining this hymn are also found in the canon. So that claim of theirs is not a reason but an evasion: that the hymn was separated from the canon because the sacrament of the king had to be hidden from carnal men. Hence they are rightly believed not to wish by these explanations to open what they read, but rather to cover what they think. Nor is it surprising, since they have believed that the Lord Jesus himself, speaking not through the mouths of prophets or apostles or angels but through his own mouth, was a mocker rather than a teacher of truth, ascribing divine authority to this hymn, where some author of the hymn invented his saying, “By a word I mocked all things, and I was not mocked at all.” Let these distinguished spiritual men answer, if they can: where shall we go, to whom shall we open our ears, whom shall we believe when he speaks, in whose promise shall we place our hope, if Christ mocked all things by a word, if the almighty Teacher mocked all things by a word, if he who is the only-begotten Word of God the Father mocked all things by a word? What more shall I say of these lost men, these vain talkers and deceivers, first of their own minds and then of others whom they have been able to join to themselves, predestined to eternal destruction? I have written back to Your Reverence both much later than I wished and at greater length than I had planned. You do very well to guard vigilantly against wolves; but labor also with pastoral diligence, with the help of the Lord of shepherds himself, to heal the sheep, if they have perhaps violated or already wounded any.

### Scripture references

- John 6:68: allusion, medium confidence
- Titus 1:10: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The hymn line is from the Acts of John 96. Allusions: John 6:68; Titus 1:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 237.9 (CSEL 57:532–533; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-237-9).

## Letter 238.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-1
- Source: CSEL 57:533
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the Arian count Pascentius, setting out his faith in writing since Pascentius refused to have their debate recorded.

### Latin text

Volueram quidem petente te atque instante, ut meminisse dignaris, immo uero pro merito aetatis ac dignitatis tuae iubente te de fide Christiana etiam praesens cum praesente, in quantum mihi facultatem dominus largiretur, conferre sermonem; sed quia tibi post prandium displicuit, quod inter nos mane placuerat. ut a notariis uerba nostra exciperentur, ne ulterius dicas, quod te audio non tacere, non me fuisse ausum tibi dicere fidem meam, his litteris accipe, quod et tu legas et, cui uolueris, legendum tradas et, quod nolueris, uicissim scribendo ipse respondeas. iniquum est enim, ut quisque iudicare de alio uelit et iudicari de se nolit.

### English translation (Claude)

I had wished, at your request and insistence, as you will remember, or rather at your command, as befits your age and rank, to confer with you in person about the Christian faith, as far as the Lord gave me ability. But since after lunch you were displeased with what had pleased us both in the morning, namely that our words should be taken down by stenographers, so that you may no longer say, as I hear you do not stop saying, that I did not dare to tell you my faith, receive it in this letter, which you may read and give to whomever you wish to read, and to which, if you disagree, you may reply in writing in turn. For it is unjust for anyone to wish to judge another and not wish to be judged himself.

### Translation notes

- To Pascentius, an Arian count and imperial official in Africa.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.1 (CSEL 57:533; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-1).

## Letter 238.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-2
- Source: CSEL 57:533–534
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reproaches Pascentius for breaking their agreement to have the debate recorded and notes that Pascentius varied his creed each time he repeated it.

### Latin text

Et de praeterito quidem placito nostro, quod condicto meridiano implere noluisti, facile existimari potest, quis nostrum fidei suae fiduciam non habuerit, utrum qui uolebat, ut diceretur, et timebat, ne teneretur, an qui usque adeo nolebat eam disceptantium iudicio subtrahi, ut mandata litteris uellet etiam legentium memoriae commendari, ne quisquam uel obliuione opinatus uel dissensione inritatus diceret ab aliquo nostrum aut non esse dictum, quod dictum erat, aut dictum esse, quod dictum non erat. in his enim solent latebras suae malae defensionis inquirere, qui contentionis sunt cupidiores quam ueritatis. hoc autem nec a te nec a me nec de te nec de me dici posset, si in fide condicti permaneres, ut uerba nostra exciperentur et scriberentur, praesertim quia tu ipse in his uerbis, quibus fidem tuam pronuntiasti, quotiens ea repetisti, totiens uariasti, quod nulla credo fraude sed obliuione factum esse.

### English translation (Claude)

As for our earlier agreement, which you refused to keep at the arranged noon meeting, it can easily be judged which of us lacked confidence in his faith: the one who wished it to be spoken and feared that it would be held to, or the one who was so unwilling to withdraw it from the judgment of those in debate that he wished it committed to writing and so entrusted to the memory of readers too, so that no one, either imagining through forgetfulness or provoked by disagreement, might say that one of us had not said what had been said, or had said what had not. For in such things those who are more eager for contention than for truth usually look for hiding places for their bad defense. But this could not have been said by you or by me, of you or of me, if you had kept faith with the agreement that our words should be taken down and written. Especially since you yourself, in the words in which you pronounced your faith, varied them as often as you repeated them; which I believe was done not by any fraud but through forgetfulness.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.2 (CSEL 57:533–534; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-2).

## Letter 238.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-3
- Source: CSEL 57:534–535
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that Pascentius's creed, when written, omitted “Father” and “incomprehensible.”

### Latin text

Nam primo dixisti credere te in deum patrem omnipotentem, inuisibilem, ingenitum, incapabilem et in Iesum Christum filium eius deum natum ante saecula, per quem facta sunt omnia. et in spiritum sanctum. quibus ego auditis cum respondissem nondum a te quicquam dictum, quod meae fidei repugnaret, et ideo, si ea scripsisses, me his etiam posse subscribere, ad hoc nescio quo modo res perducta est, ut accepta charta ea ipsa, quae dixeras, uelles etiam litteris tua manu exprimere. quod cum mihi ad legendum dedisses, animaduerti minus te scripsisse patrem, cum scripsisses deum omnipotentem, inuisibilem, ingenitum, innatum). quod ubi commemoraui, non post multam altercationem addidisti patrem; et incapabilem quidem, quod uerbis dixeras, scripto praetermiseras, sed nulla hinc a me facta commemoratio est.

### English translation (Claude)

For first you said that you believed “in God the Father almighty, invisible, unbegotten, incomprehensible, and in Jesus Christ his Son, God born before the ages, through whom all things were made, and in the Holy Spirit.” When I heard this and answered that nothing had yet been said by you that contradicted my faith, and that therefore, if you wrote it down, I could also subscribe to it, the matter somehow came to this, that you took a sheet and wished to set down in writing with your own hand the very words you had spoken. When you had given it to me to read, I noticed that you had not written “Father,” since you had written “God almighty, invisible, unbegotten, unborn.” When I pointed this out, you added “Father” after not much argument; and “incomprehensible,” which you had said in speech, you had left out in writing, but I made no mention of that.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: allusion, medium confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.3 (CSEL 57:534–535; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-3).

## Letter 238.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-4
- Source: CSEL 57:535–536
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that Pascentius anathematized Arius and Eunomius but demanded that the word homoousios be shown in Scripture, while Augustine insisted the thing matters more than the word.

### Latin text

Deinde cum dixissem me paratum esse subscribere, adhuc illa uerba etiam mea esse posse, prius quaesiui, ne, quod in mentem uenerat. laberetur, utrum alicubi scripturarum diuinarum legeretur pater ingenitus; hoc autem feci, quia in exordio sermonis nostri, cum Arrius et Eunomius commemorati essent non a me sed a fratre meo Alypio requirente, quemnam eorum secutus esset Auxentius, qui abs te paulo ante fuerat non parua praedicatione laudatus, exclamando anathemasti et Arrium et Eunomium. tum continuo flagitasti, ut et nos anathemaremus όμοούσιον. quasi quisquam homo esset, qui hoc uocaretur. sicut Arrius et Eunomius. deinde uehementer exigebas, ut hoc uerbum tibi in scripturis ostenderemus, et statim nobis communicares. respondebatur a nobis, quia nos Latine loqueremur et illud Graecum esset, prius quaerendum esse, quid sit όμοούσιον, et tunc exigendum, ut in libris sanctis ostenderetur. tu contra uerbum ipsum crebro repetens et inuidiose uentilans atque in conciliis maiorum nostrorum conscriptum commemorans uehementer urguebas, ut ipsum omnino uerbum, quod est όμοούσιον, in sanctis libris ostenderemus, nobis etiam atque etiam reuocantibus. quia lingua nostra Graeca non esset, prius interpretandum et exponendum esse. quid sit όμοούσιον, tum demum in diuinis litteris requirendum, quia, etsi fortasse nomen ipsum non inueniretur, res ipsa tamen inueniretur; quid est enim contentiosius quam, ubi de re constat, certare de nomine?

### English translation (Claude)

Then, when I had said I was ready to subscribe, since those words could also be mine, I first asked, so that what had come to mind would not slip away, whether “the Father unbegotten” was read anywhere in the divine Scriptures. I did this because at the beginning of our conversation, when Arius and Eunomius had been mentioned, not by me but by my brother Alypius, who asked which of them Auxentius had followed (Auxentius having shortly before been praised by you with no small commendation), you cried out and anathematized both Arius and Eunomius. Then you at once demanded that we too anathematize homoousios, as though there were some man called that, like Arius and Eunomius. Then you insisted vehemently that we show you this word in the Scriptures, and you would immediately enter into communion with us. We answered that, since we spoke Latin and that was Greek, we must first ask what homoousios is, and then demand that it be shown in the holy books. You, on the contrary, repeating the word itself often and tossing it about invidiously, and recalling that it was written in the councils of our forebears, pressed vehemently that we show that very word, homoousios, in the holy books, while we again and again recalled that, since our language was not Greek, we must first translate and explain what homoousios is, and only then look for it in the divine writings; because, even if the name itself was perhaps not found, the thing itself would be found. For what is more contentious than to fight about a name when the thing is agreed?

### Translation notes

- Homoousios (“of the same substance”), the term of the Creed of Nicaea. Auxentius: the Arian bishop of Milan before Ambrose (or Auxentius of Durostorum); uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.4 (CSEL 57:535–536; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-4).

## Letter 238.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-5
- Source: CSEL 57:536
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts how an Arian admitted “unbegotten” is not in Scripture yet rightly said, which Augustine applied to homoousios.

### Latin text

Haec ergo quia inter nos iam conlocuti fueramus, posteaquam ad id uentum est, ut fidem tuam, sicut commemoraui, scriberes, quamquam nihil in eis uerbis uiderem nostrae fidei esse contrarium et propterea me dicerem paratum esse subscribere, quaesiui, ut dixi, utrum scriptura dei contineret hoc uerbum, quod pater esset ingenitus, et, cum scriptum esse respondisses, instantius quaerebam, ut ostenderes. tunc unus ex eis, qui aderant, quantum intellegi datur, fidei tuae socius ait mihi: Quid ergo? tu patrem genitum dicis? respondi: Non dico. et ille: Si ergo genitus non est, inquit, utique ingenitus est. cui ego: Vides. inquam, posse fieri, ut etiam de uerbo, quod in scriptura dei non est, reddatur tamen ratio, unde recte dici ostendatur. sic ergo et όμοούσιον, quod in auctoritate diuinorum librorum cogebamur ostendere, etiamsi uocabulum ipsum non ibi inueniamus, fieri posse, ut illud inueniamus, cui hoc uocabulum recte adhibitum iudicetur.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, then, we had already discussed these things, when it came to your writing down your faith, as I have related, although I saw nothing in those words contrary to our faith and therefore said I was ready to subscribe, I asked, as I said, whether the Scripture of God contained this word, that the Father is unbegotten; and when you answered that it was written, I pressed you more urgently to show it. Then one of those present, a partner in your faith as far as one can tell, said to me: “What then? Do you call the Father begotten?” I answered: “I do not.” And he said: “If, then, he is not begotten, he is certainly unbegotten.” I said to him: “You see that it can happen that even for a word that is not in the Scripture of God a reason can be given showing that it is rightly said. So also with homoousios, which we were being forced to show on the authority of the divine books: even if we do not find the term itself there, it can happen that we find that to which this term is judged rightly applied.”

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.5 (CSEL 57:536; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-5).

## Letter 238.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-6
- Source: CSEL 57:536–537
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that Pascentius first said “unbegotten” would injure God, then defended it, tore up his written creed, and agreed to a recorded afternoon debate.

### Latin text

Quibus dictis, quid hinc tibi uideretur, adtendi, ut audirem, et aisti recte factum esse, ut ingenitus pater in scripturis sanctis non diceretur, ne illi uel tali uerbo fieret iniuria. ergo inquam, modo facta est iniuria deo et hoc manu tua. quo audito fateri iam coeperas nec te hoc dicere debuisse. sed cum admonerem. ut, si tibi tale uideretur hoc uerbum, ut ad dei pertineret iniuriam, deleres illud inde, ubi scripseras, considerasti, credo. posse id recte dici et posse defendi et rursus aisti: Prorsus ego hoc dico. tum ego illud, quod iam dixeram. repetiui ita fieri posse, ut etiam όμοούσιον neque scriptum in sanctis paginis inueniatur et tamen dictum in assertione fidei defendatur. sicut patrem in illis libris nusquam ingenitum legimus et tamen dicendum esse defenditur. tunc a me chartam, quam dederas. abstulisti et conscidisti. et constituimus, post meridianum tempus ut adessent notarii ad excipienda uerba nostra atque inter nos ista, quantum possemus, diligentius tractaremus.

### English translation (Claude)

When this had been said, I waited to hear what you thought of it, and you said it was rightly done that the Father was not called unbegotten in the holy Scriptures, so that no injury might be done to him by such a word. “Then,” I said, “injury has just been done to God, and by your hand.” On hearing this you had begun to admit that you ought not to have said it either. But when I advised you that, if this word seemed to you such as to injure God, you should delete it from where you had written it, you considered, I believe, that it could rightly be said and defended, and said again: “I certainly say it.” Then I repeated what I had already said, that it could happen that homoousios too is not found written in the holy pages and yet is defended as said in the assertion of the faith, just as we nowhere read in those books that the Father is unbegotten, and yet it is defended as something that must be said. Then you took from me the sheet you had given me and tore it up. And we agreed that in the afternoon stenographers should be present to take down our words, and that we should treat these matters between us more carefully, as far as we could.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.6 (CSEL 57:536–537; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-6).

## Letter 238.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-7
- Source: CSEL 57:537–538
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that at the afternoon meeting Pascentius refused to dictate his words, accusing the bishops of preparing a false charge.

### Latin text

Venimus, ut nosti, ad horam condictam; notarios adduximus, ut et tui adessent: consedimus. dixisti rursus fidem tuam atque in uerbis tuis non audiui ingenitum patrem, credo, quod cogitaueris, quid inde mane dictum fuerit, et praecauere uolueris. deinde poposcisti. ut etiam ego dicerem fidem meam. ubi cum postulassem commemorans antemeridianum placitum nostrum, ut ea. quae dixeras, dictare potius dignareris, tunc exclamasti calumniam parare nos tibi et ideo uerba tua conscripta uelle retinere. ibi quid responderim, recordari non libet atque utinam nec tu memineris. seruaui tamen debitam honorificentiam honori tuo nec maledictum deputaui, quod non a ueritate sed a potestate audire meruissem. tamen. quia uel ipsa uerba repetiui, ut pressa uoce dicerem: Itane calumniam paramus nos tibi? ut ignoscas, peto.

### English translation (Claude)

We came, as you know, at the agreed hour; we brought stenographers, and yours too were to be present; we sat down. You stated your faith again, and in your words I did not hear “the Father unbegotten,” I suppose because you had thought about what had been said about it in the morning and wished to be on guard. Then you asked me to state my faith too. When I asked, recalling our morning agreement, that you rather deign to dictate what you had said, you cried out that we were preparing a false charge against you and therefore wanted to keep your words in writing. What I answered then I do not like to recall, and I wish you did not remember it either. Yet I kept the respect due to your rank, and did not count as an insult what I had deserved to hear not from truth but from power. Still, because I did repeat those very words, saying in a low voice, “Are we really preparing a false charge against you?”, I ask your pardon.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.7 (CSEL 57:537–538; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-7).

## Letter 238.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-8
- Source: CSEL 57:538–539
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recounts that Pascentius omitted “God the Son,” refused to have the words recorded, and mocked Augustine's reputation.

### Latin text

Sed tu his auditis rursus fidem tuam sono clariore repetisti atque in uerbis tuis non audiui deum filium quod numquam, quotiens eam dixisti, tacueras. hic ego cum modeste, ut poteram, postularem, ut de excipiendis uerbis nostris. quod inter nos placuerat, impleretur, etiam ipsam utilitatem de praesenti experimento suggessi dicens te ipsum non potuisse in memoria uerba tua tibi usitatissima retinere, quando numquam ea repetere ualuisti, ubi non aliquid et maxime necessarium praeterires; quanto minus posse illos, qui nos audirent, ita nostrorum meminisse uerborum, ut, si quid forte uel tu de meis uel ego de tuis uerbis uellem retractare atque discutere, ualerent seu dictum seu non dictum liquido recordari, in qua nobis difficultate facillime notariorum recitatio subueniret! tunc indignanter dixisti melius fuisse, ut famam meam semper audires, eo quod longe inferiorem me expertus esses, quam tibi illa iactasset. tunc ego commemoraui, cum te ante prandium salutaremus et eam nobis famam praedicasses. hoc me dixisse, quod de me illa mentita sit. hic sane aisti uerum me dixisse. proinde cum duo tibi de me diuersa locuti sint. aliud fama mea et aliud ego, magis utique gaudere debeo me potius quam illam repertum esse ueracem. sed quia scriptum est: Solus deus uerax, omnis autem homo mendax, uereor, ne hoc quoque de me temere dixerim; neque enim in nobis ipsis uel per nos ipsos ueraces sumus, cum sumus, sed cum ille in seruis suis loquitur, qui solus est uerax.

### English translation (Claude)

But when you heard this, you repeated your faith again in a louder voice, and in your words I did not hear “God the Son,” which you had never left out whenever you stated it. Here, when I asked as modestly as I could that our agreement about taking down our words be kept, I also pointed out its usefulness from the present experience, saying that you yourself had not been able to keep in memory your own most familiar words, since you could never repeat them without leaving out something, and something most necessary; how much less could those listening to us remember our words so well that, if either you wished to reconsider and discuss something of mine or I of yours, they could clearly recall whether it was said or not; in which difficulty the stenographers' reading back would most easily help us! Then you said indignantly that it would have been better for you always to hear my reputation, because you had found me far inferior to what it had boasted to you. Then I recalled that when we greeted you before lunch and you had spoken of that reputation to us, I had said that it had lied about me. Here indeed you said I had spoken the truth. So since two things have told you different things about me, my reputation one thing and I another, I ought surely to rejoice that I rather than it was found truthful. But since it is written, “God alone is true, but every man is a liar,” I fear I may have said this too rashly of myself; for we are not truthful in ourselves or by ourselves, when we are, but when he speaks in his servants who alone is true.

### Scripture references

- Rom 3:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Rom 3:4 (Ps 116:11).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.8 (CSEL 57:538–539; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/235-1/#p-238-8).

## Letter 238.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-9
- Source: CSEL 57:539–540
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that Pascentius's refusal of stenographers shows his own fear, not Augustine's, and that such debates should be recorded.

### Latin text

Haec si, ut narraui, gesta esse recolis, uides, quam non debeas iactare apud homines, quod non ausus sim tibi adserere fidem meam. quando quidem in fide nostri placiti stare noluisti et uir tantus, qui pro fide. quam rei publicae debes. non times maledicta prouincialium, pro fide, quam Christo debes, times calumnias episcoporum. deinde, cum disputationi nostrae etiam honoratos uiros interesse cupiueris, miror, quo modo in ipsa deuitatione calumniae uerba tua times a notariis conscribi et ex ore tuo a clarissimis testibus non times audiri. nonne consideras difficile esse, ut homines suspicentur te a nobis ullam formidasse calumniam, ut uerba tua excipi nolles, sed, cum cogitasses retentum te fuisse in uerbo ante prandium manu tua conscripto, simul etiam cogitasse non tam facile te notariorum tabulas delere potuisse, quam facile illam chartulam conscidisti? si autem dicis non illa ita gesta esse, ut a me narrata sunt, aut tu obliuione falleris - non enim audeo dicere mentiris - aut ego uel similiter fallor uel mentior. uides ergo. quam recte dicam ea, quae de his maxime rebus geruntur, excipi atque conscribi oportere et quam tibi quoque hoc ipsum recte placuerat, nisi postmeridianus timor antemeridianum placitum frangeret.

### English translation (Claude)

If you remember that these things happened as I have told them, you see how wrong it is for you to boast among men that I did not dare to state my faith to you, since you would not keep faith with our agreement; and that so great a man, who for the loyalty you owe the state do not fear the curses of provincials, for the faith you owe Christ fear false charges from bishops. Then, since you wanted men of rank to be present at our debate, I wonder how, in the very avoidance of false charges, you fear having your words written down by stenographers and do not fear their being heard from your mouth by most distinguished witnesses. Do you not see that people will hardly suspect that you feared any false charge from us, so that you would not let your words be taken down, but rather that, when you thought you had been held to a word written by your own hand before lunch, you also thought that you could not delete the stenographers' tablets as easily as you tore up that sheet? But if you say these things did not happen as I have told them, either you are deceived by forgetfulness (for I do not dare to say you are lying), or I am likewise deceived or lying. You see, then, how rightly I say that what is done above all in these matters ought to be taken down and written, and how rightly this had pleased you too, had not your afternoon fear broken your morning agreement.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.9 (CSEL 57:539–540; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-9).

## Letter 238.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-10
- Source: CSEL 57:540
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine states his faith in the eternal Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and the rule of reading texts about Christ according to the form of God or the form of a servant.

### Latin text

Audi ergo iam fidem meam. potens est misericordia domini dei nostri, quae praestet me, quod credidi. sic loqui, ut nec eius offendam ueritatem nec humanitatem tuam. in omnipotentem deum patrem me credere profiteor eumque aeternum ea aeternitate, hoc est inmortalitate dico, quam solus deus habet; hoc et de filio eius unigenito credo in forma dei, hoc et de spiritu dei sancto, qui spiritus est dei patris et filii eius unigeniti. sed quia ipse dei patris unigenitus filius, dominus et deus noster Iesus Christus, postquam uenit plenitudo temporis, opportune ad diem salutis nostrae formam serui accepit, multa de illo in scripturis secundum formam dei dicuntur, multa secundum formam serui. quorum exempli gratia duo quaedam commemoro, ut singula ad singula referantur. secundum formam dei de se ipse dixit: Ego et pater unum sumus, secundum formam serui: Quoniam pater maior me est.

### English translation (Claude)

Hear now, then, my faith. The mercy of the Lord our God is able to grant me to speak what I have believed in such a way as to offend neither his truth nor your courtesy. I profess that I believe in God the Father almighty, and that he is eternal with that eternity, that is, I mean immortality, which God alone has. This I believe also of his only-begotten Son in the form of God; this also of the Holy Spirit of God, who is the Spirit of God the Father and of his only-begotten Son. But since the only-begotten Son of God the Father himself, our Lord and God Jesus Christ, after the fullness of time came, fittingly for the day of our salvation took the form of a servant, many things are said of him in the Scriptures according to the form of God and many according to the form of a servant. Of these I mention two for example, so that each may be referred to its own. According to the form of God he said of himself, “I and the Father are one”; according to the form of a servant, “For the Father is greater than I.”

### Scripture references

- Gal 4:4: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:6–7: allusion, high confidence
- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence
- John 14:28: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Gal 4:4; 2 Cor 6:2; Phil 2:6–7. Quotations: John 10:30; John 14:28.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.10 (CSEL 57:540; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-10).

## Letter 238.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-11
- Source: CSEL 57:540–541
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that texts on God's sole immortality apply to the whole Trinity, and that if those joined are called one body or one spirit, Father, Son and Spirit are much more one God.

### Latin text

Quod autem de deo scriptum est: Qui solus habet inmortalitatem et: Inuisibili soli deo honor et gloria et cetera huius modi, non de patre tantum accipimus sed etiam de filio, quod ad formam dei adtinet, et de spiritu sancto. pater enim. et filius et spiritus sanctus unus deus est et solus uerus deus et solus inmortalis secundum incommutabilem omnino substantiam. si enim de carne diuersi sexus dictum est: Qui adhaeret meretrici, unum corpus est et de spiritu hominis. qui non est, quod dominus, consequenter scriptum est: Qui autem adhaeret domino, unus spiritus est. quanto magis deus pater in filio et deus filius in patre et spiritus patris et filii unus deus est, ubi nulla est diuersa natura. cum ex diuersis modo quodam sibi cohaerentibus dicatur uel spiritus unus uel corpus unum!

### English translation (Claude)

What is written of God, “who alone has immortality,” and, “To the invisible, only God be honor and glory,” and other things of this kind, we take not of the Father only but also of the Son, as regards the form of God, and of the Holy Spirit. For the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God, and the only true God, and the only immortal one, according to their altogether unchangeable substance. For if it is said of flesh of different sexes, “He who joins himself to a harlot is one body,” and of the spirit of man, which is not what the Lord is, it is consequently written, “But he who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit,” how much more are God the Father in the Son and God the Son in the Father and the Spirit of the Father and the Son one God, where there is no different nature, since even of different things joined in some way to each other it is said “one spirit” or “one body”!

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 6:16: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 1:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:16–17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Tim 6:16; 1 Tim 1:17; 1 Cor 6:16–17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.11 (CSEL 57:540–541; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-11).

## Letter 238.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-12
- Source: CSEL 57:541–542
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues by analogy with soul and body and the inner and outer man that Father and Son, being one in nature, are not two gods but one God.

### Latin text

Et cum ex anima et corpore sibi cohaerentibus dicatur unus homo, cur non multo maxime patre et filio sibi cohaerentibus dicatur unus deus, cum sibimet inseparabiliter cohaereant, quo modo non corpus et anima? et cum corpus et anima sit unus homo, quamuis corpus et anima non sint unum cur non multo magis sit pater et filius unus deus, cum pater et filius unum sint secundum illam ueritatis uocem: Ego et Pater unum sumus? item cum homo interior et homo exterior non sint unum — neque enim eiusdem naturae est exterior cuius interior. quia exterior cum nuncupato corpore dicitur homo. interior autem in sola rationali anima intellegitur — utrumque tamen simul non homines duo sed unus dicitur, quanto magis pater et filius unus deus est, cum pater et filius unum sint, quia eiusdem naturae uel substantiae sunt uel si quo alio uocabulo congruentius dicitur id, quod deus est, unde dictum est: Ego et pater unum sumus! itaque unus spiritus domini et unus spiritus hominis et non sunt unum et tamen, ille cum cohaeret domino. non sunt duo sed unus spiritus; et unus homo interior et unus homo exterior et non sunt unum et tamen propter conexionem uinculi naturalis simul utrumque non duo sed unus homo; multo magis, cum filius dei dicat: Ego et pater unum sumus, unus est deus pater et unus deus filius et tamen simul utrumque non duo dii sed unus deus.

### English translation (Claude)

And if from soul and body joined to each other one man is spoken of, why should not one God be spoken of all the more from Father and Son joined to each other, since they are joined inseparably, as body and soul are not? And if body and soul are one man, though body and soul are not one, why are not the Father and Son much more one God, since the Father and the Son are one, according to that voice of truth, “I and the Father are one”? Again, although the inner man and the outer man are not one (for the outer is not of the same nature as the inner, since the outer is called man together with the body, while the inner is understood in the rational soul alone), yet the two together are called not two men but one; how much more are the Father and Son one God, since the Father and the Son are one, because they are of the same nature or substance, or whatever other word more fittingly expresses what God is, whence it was said, “I and the Father are one”! So the one spirit of the Lord and the one spirit of a man are not one, and yet, when the latter is joined to the Lord, they are not two but one spirit; and the one inner man and the one outer man are not one, and yet, because of the connection of the natural bond, both together are not two but one man; much more, since the Son of God says, “I and the Father are one,” is the Father one God and the Son one God, and yet both together not two gods but one God.

### Scripture references

- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 4:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 10:30 (three times). Allusion: 2 Cor 4:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.12 (CSEL 57:541–542; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-12).

## Letter 238.13

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-13
- Source: CSEL 57:542–543
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that if the unity of the first believers made them one soul and heart, the Father and Son, eternally one in nature, are all the more one God.

### Latin text

Quod enim fecit in multis sanctis in adoptionem filiorum uocatis coheredibus Christi una fides et una spes et una caritas, ut esset eis anima una et cor unum in deum, hoc praecipue cogit intellegi una eademque patris et filii natura. si ita dicendum est, deitatis, ut pater et filius, qui unum sunt et inseparabiliter unum sunt et sempiterne unum sunt, non sint duo dii sed unus deus. illi enim homines per consortium et communionem unius eiusdemque naturae, qua omnes homines erant, unum erant, etsi aliquando secundum diuersitates uoluntatum et sententiarum et opinionum morumque dissimilitudines non erant unum; erunt autem plene perfecteque unum. cum peruentum fuerit ad eum finem, ut sit deus omnia. in omnibus. deus autem pater et filius eius, uerbum eius, deus apud deum, semper atque ineffabiliter unum sunt, unde magis non duo dii sed unus deus.

### English translation (Claude)

For what one faith, one hope and one love did in many saints called to the adoption of sons and fellow heirs with Christ, so that they had one soul and one heart toward God, compels us above all to understand the one and the same nature, or, if it should be so said, deity, of the Father and the Son, so that the Father and the Son, who are one, and inseparably one, and eternally one, are not two gods but one God. For those men were one through sharing and communion in the one and the same nature by which they were all men, though at times, because of differences of will and opinion and dissimilarity of character, they were not one; but they will be fully and perfectly one when that end is reached in which God will be all in all. But God the Father and his Son, his Word, God with God, are always and ineffably one; hence all the more not two gods but one God.

### Scripture references

- Rom 8:17: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:28: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Rom 8:15–17; Acts 4:32; 1 Cor 15:28; John 1:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.13 (CSEL 57:542–543; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-13).

## Letter 238.14

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-14
- Source: CSEL 57:543
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the names Father, Son and Spirit signify relations, not different substances, and that confusing the form of a servant with the form of God leads to error.

### Latin text

Homines autem minus intellegentes, quid propter quid dicatur, praecipites uolunt habere sententias et scripturis non diligenter scrutatis arripiunt defensionem cuiusque opinionis et ab ea uel numquam uel difficile deflectuntur, dum docti atque sapientes magis putari quam esse concupiscunt; ea quippe, quae propter formam serui dicta sunt. uolunt transferre ad formam dei et rursus. quae dicta sunt, ut ad se inuicem personae referantur, uolunt nomina esse naturae atque substantiae. fides autem nostra est patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum unum deum credere et confiteri nec tamen eum, qui filius est, patrem dicere nec eum, qui pater est, filium nec eum, qui spiritus patris et filii est, aut patrem aut filium nuncupare. his enim appellationibus hoc significatur, quod ad se inuicem referuntur, non ipsa substantia, qua unum sunt. nam et pater cum dicitur, nonnisi alicuius filii dicitur et filius nonnisi alicuius patris intellegitur et spiritus secundum id, quod ad aliquid refertur, spirantis alicuius est et spirans utique spiritum spirans est.

### English translation (Claude)

But men who do not understand well what is said on account of what, want to have hasty opinions, and, without searching the Scriptures diligently, seize on a defense of whatever opinion they hold, and from it are turned either never or with difficulty, as long as they desire to be thought learned and wise rather than to be so. For they want to transfer to the form of God what was said on account of the form of a servant; and again, what was said so that the persons are related to one another, they want to be names of nature and substance. But our faith is to believe and confess that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God, and yet not to call him who is the Son the Father, nor him who is the Father the Son, nor to name him who is the Spirit of the Father and the Son either Father or Son. For these names signify that they are related to one another, not the substance itself by which they are one. For when “Father” is said, it is said only of some son, and “Son” is understood only of some father, and “Spirit,” insofar as it is related to something, is of someone who breathes, and the one who breathes certainly breathes a spirit.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.14 (CSEL 57:543; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-14).

## Letter 238.15

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-15
- Source: CSEL 57:543–545
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that “spirit” as a name of nature applies to Father, Son and Spirit alike, and to all incorporeal natures, while “Holy Spirit” names the relation to Father and Son.

### Latin text

Non autem ista corporaliter sentiuntur nec usitato modo intelleguntur in deo, qui potens est facere, sicut apostolus dicit, supra, quam petimus et intellegimus; si autem facere. quanto magis esse! nam hoc nomen, quod spiritus dicitur, non secundum id, quod refertur ad aliquid. sed secundum id, quod aliquam naturam significat. omnis incorporea natura spiritus in scripturis appellatur: unde non tantum patri et filio et spiritui sancto sed omni rationali creaturae et animae hoc uocabulum congruit. unde dominus dicit: Spiritus est deus et ideo, qui adorant deum, in spiritu et ueritate oportet adorare; scriptum est etiam: Qui facit angelos suos spiritus; dictum est et de hominibus quibusdam: Quoniam caro sunt et spiritus ambulans et non reuertens; et apostolus ait: Nemo scit. quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est: item scriptum est: Quis scit. spiritus filiorum hominis si ascendat ipse sursum et spiritus pecoris si descendat ipse deorsum in terram? dicitur etiam spiritus in scripturis secundum quandam distinctionem in ipsa una unius hominis anima, unde apostolus dicit: Et integer spiritus uester et anima et corpus in die domini nostri Iesu Christi seruetur; item alio loco: Si orauero lingua. spiritus meus orat; mens autem mea infructuosa est. quid ergo est? orabo spiritu, orabo et mente. proprio autem modo quodam dicitur spiritus sanctus, secundum quod refertur ad patrem et filium, quod eorum spiritus sit nam secundum substantiam, quoniam semel dictum est: Spiritus est deus, et pater spiritus est et filius et ipse spiritus sanctus nec tamen tres sed unus spiritus sicut non tres dii sed unus. deus.

### English translation (Claude)

But these things are not perceived bodily nor understood in the usual way in God, who is able to do, as the apostle says, beyond what we ask and understand; and if to do, how much more to be! For the name “spirit” is used not according to relation to something but as signifying a certain nature. Every incorporeal nature is called spirit in the Scriptures; hence this word fits not only the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit but every rational creature and soul. So the Lord says, “God is spirit, and therefore those who worship God must worship in spirit and truth”; it is also written, “who makes his angels spirits”; and it is said of certain men, “for they are flesh and a spirit that goes and does not return”; and the apostle says, “No one knows what goes on in a man except the spirit of the man that is in him”; again it is written, “Who knows whether the spirit of the sons of men goes upward, and the spirit of the beast goes down to the earth?” In the Scriptures “spirit” is also used by a certain distinction within the one soul of one man, so that the apostle says, “and may your spirit and soul and body be kept whole in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ”; and again elsewhere, “If I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful. What then? I will pray with the spirit, I will pray with the mind also.” But the Holy Spirit is so called in a particular way insofar as he is related to the Father and the Son, being their Spirit. For as to substance, since it has once been said, “God is spirit,” the Father is spirit and the Son and the Holy Spirit himself, and yet not three spirits but one spirit, just as not three gods but one God.

### Scripture references

- Eph 3:20: allusion, high confidence
- John 4:24: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 104:4 (103:4 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 78:39 (77:39 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 2:11: quotation, high confidence
- Eccl 3:21: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Thess 5:23: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 14:14–15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Eph 3:20 (adapted); John 4:24; Ps 104:4 (LXX 103:4); Ps 78:39 (LXX 77:39); 1 Cor 2:11; Eccl 3:21; 1 Thess 5:23; 1 Cor 14:14–15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.15 (CSEL 57:543–545; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-15).

## Letter 238.16

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-16
- Source: CSEL 57:545–546
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine appeals to the peace of God that surpasses understanding, which unites Father, Son and Spirit far more than it united the first believers, and urges a peaceful search of Scripture.

### Latin text

Quid miraris? tantum ualet pax non qualiscumque, ut solet intellegi, nec talis. qualis laudatur in hac uita per concordiam caritatemque fidelium, sed illa pax dei, quae, sicut dicit apostolus, supergreditur omnem intellectum; quem, nisi nostrum, id est omnis rationalis creaturae? quapropter considerantes, infirmitatem nostram et audientes apostolum confitentem et dicentem: Fratres, ego me non arbitror adprehendisse et: Qui se putat aliquid scire, nondum scit, quem ad modum oportet scire, cum diuinis scripturis, quantum possumus, conloquamur sine contentione pacati. non inani ac puerili animositate studentes alterutrum uincere, ut pax Christi potius uincat in cordibus nostris, quantum eam nobis et in hac uita percipere posse donauit, ut cogitantes, quid eadem pax inter fratres egerit, quorum ex tam multis animabus et multis cordibus fecit animam unam et cor unum in deum, debita pietate credamus multo maxime in illa pace dei. quae superat omnem intellectum, et patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum non esse tres deos sed unum deum tanto excellentius. quam istorum erat anima et cor unum. quanto illa pax. quae superat omnem intellectum, excellentior est ista pace, quam tenebat omnium illorum cor unum et una anima in deum.

### English translation (Claude)

Why are you surprised? Such is the power of peace, not of any kind, as it is usually understood, nor such as is praised in this life through the harmony and love of believers, but that peace of God which, as the apostle says, surpasses all understanding: whose understanding, if not ours, that is, of every rational creature? Therefore, considering our weakness and hearing the apostle confess and say, “Brothers, I do not consider that I have laid hold of it,” and, “Whoever thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know,” let us converse with the divine Scriptures as far as we can, peacefully, without contention, not striving with empty and childish animosity to defeat each other, so that rather the peace of Christ may conquer in our hearts, as far as he has granted us to receive it even in this life. And considering what that same peace did among the brothers, making of so many souls and many hearts one soul and one heart toward God, let us believe with due piety that much more in that peace of God which surpasses all understanding the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are not three gods but one God, as much more excellently than those men's soul and heart were one, as that peace which surpasses all understanding is more excellent than this peace which held the one heart and one soul of all of them toward God.

### Scripture references

- Phil 4:7: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 3:13: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:2: quotation, high confidence
- Col 3:15: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Phil 4:7; Phil 3:13; 1 Cor 8:2; Col 3:15; Acts 4:32.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.16 (CSEL 57:545–546; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-16).

## Letter 238.17

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-17
- Source: CSEL 57:546
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the one Christ is both Son of God and Son of Man, so the Son of God is said to be crucified in his human weakness.

### Latin text

Filium autem hominis eundem dicimus, quem filium dei, non tamen propter formam dei, in qua est aequalis deo patri. sed propter acceptam formam serui, qua maior est pater. et quia eundem filium hominis dicimus, propter hoc et filium dei crucifixum fatemur non ex uirtute diuinitatis sed ex infirmitate humanitatis, non ex suae naturae permansione sed ex nostrae susceptione.

### English translation (Claude)

We call the same one the Son of Man whom we call the Son of God, not, however, on account of the form of God, in which he is equal to God the Father, but on account of the form of a servant that he took, in which the Father is greater. And because we call the same one the Son of Man, for this reason we also confess that the Son of God was crucified, not from the power of his divinity but from the weakness of his humanity, not by the abiding of his own nature but by his taking up of ours.

### Scripture references

- Phil 2:6–7: allusion, high confidence
- 2 Cor 13:4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Phil 2:6–7; 2 Cor 13:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.17 (CSEL 57:546; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-17).

## Letter 238.18

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-18
- Source: CSEL 57:546–547
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Deut 6:4, Thomas's confession and 1 Cor 8:5–6 that Father and Son are together the one Lord God.

### Latin text

Iam nunc paululum intuere, quae scripturarum eloquia nos cogant unum dominum deum confiteri, siue tantum de patre siue tantum de filio siue tantum de spiritu sancto siue simul de patre et filio et spiritu sancto interrogemur. certe scriptum est: Audi, Israhel, dominus deus tuus dominus unus est. de quo putas dictum? si tantum de patre, non est dominus deus noster Iesus Christus; et ubi Thomae uox illa tangentis et clamantis: Dominus meus et deus meus, quam Christus ipse non reprehendit, sed adprobauit dicens: Quia uidisti, credidisti? porro si et filius dominus deus est et pater dominus deus et ambo iam duo domini et duo dii, quo modo erit uerum: Dominus deus tuus dominus unus est? an forte pater est unus dominus, filius autem non unus dominus sed tantum dominus, sicut sunt dii multi et domini multi, non sicut ille unus, de quo scriptum est: Dominus deus tuus dominus unus est? quid ergo apostolo respondebimus dicenti: Nam etsi sunt, qui dicuntur dii, siue in caelo siue in terra, sicut sunt dii multi et domini multi, nobis tamen unus deus pater. ex quo omnia et nos in ipso, et unus dominus noster Iesus Christus, per quem omnia et nos per ipsum? porro si, quod de uno deo patre dicitur, cogit inde filium separari, dicant, qui audent, non posse iam intellegi dominum patrem, quia unus, inquit, dominus noster Iesus Christus. nam si unus, utique solus; si solus, quo modo et pater, nisi quia et ipse et pater unus deus et solus deus non separato spiritu sancto? unus ergo deus pater et cum illo filius unus deus, quamuis non cum illo unus pater, itemque unus dominus Iesus Christus et cum illo unus dominus pater, quamuis non cum illo unus Iesus Christus, tamquam et pater sit Iesus Christus; hoc enim nomen ex dispensatione misericordiae susceptaeque humanitatis adsumptum est.

### English translation (Claude)

Now consider for a little which words of the Scriptures compel us to confess one Lord God, whether we are asked about the Father alone, or the Son alone, or the Holy Spirit alone, or about the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit together. Certainly it is written: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one Lord.” Of whom do you think this was said? If of the Father only, then our Lord Jesus Christ is not Lord God; and where is that cry of Thomas as he touched him, “My Lord and my God,” which Christ himself did not rebuke but approved, saying, “Because you have seen, you have believed”? Further, if the Son is Lord God and the Father is Lord God, and both are now two lords and two gods, how will it be true that “the Lord your God is one Lord”? Or perhaps the Father is one Lord, but the Son is not one Lord but only a lord, as there are many gods and many lords, not as that one of whom it is written, “The Lord your God is one Lord”? What then shall we answer the apostle when he says, “For although there are those called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, as there are many gods and many lords, yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we in him, and one Lord, our Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we through him”? Further, if what is said of one God the Father forces the Son to be separated from it, let those who dare say that the Father can no longer be understood as Lord, because, it says, “one Lord, our Jesus Christ.” For if one, certainly alone; if alone, how is the Father Lord too, unless because he and the Father are one God and God alone, the Holy Spirit not being separated? So the Father is one God, and with him the Son is one God, though not with him one Father; and likewise Jesus Christ is one Lord, and with him the Father is one Lord, though not with him one Jesus Christ, as if the Father too were Jesus Christ; for this name was taken from the dispensation of mercy and the humanity assumed.

### Scripture references

- Deut 6:4: quotation, high confidence
- John 20:28–29: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:5–6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Deut 6:4; John 20:28–29; 1 Cor 8:5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.18 (CSEL 57:546–547; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-18).

## Letter 238.19

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-19
- Source: CSEL 57:547–548
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Rom 11:34–36 that “from him, through him and in him are all things” refers to one Lord, Father and Son together.

### Latin text

An forte. quod ait apostolus: Unus dominus noster Iesus Christus, per quem omnia, non uultis adiungi. quod dictum est unus, ad id, quod est dominus. sed ad id, quod ait per quem omnia, ut non unus dominus sed unus, per quem omnia: intellegatur, ut non sit pater. per quem omnia. sed pater solus, ex quo omnia, et filius solus. per quem omnia? si ita est, iam tandem fatemini unum dominum et deum nostrum esse patrem et filium. quis enim cognouit sensum domini? aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? aut quis prior dedit ei et retribuetur ei? quoniam ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia, ipsi gloria. neque enim dixit ex patre omnia et per filium omnia sed ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso. quo? nisi domino. de quo ait: Quis enim cognouit sensum domini? ex domino ergo et per dominum et in domino omnia non alio illo et alio isto sed uno domino, quia non dixit ipsis gloria sed ipsi gloria.

### English translation (Claude)

Or perhaps in what the apostle says, “one Lord, our Jesus Christ, through whom are all things,” you do not want “one” to be joined to “Lord” but to “through whom are all things,” so that it is understood not as one Lord but as the one through whom are all things, so that the Father is not the one through whom are all things, but the Father alone is the one from whom are all things, and the Son alone the one through whom are all things? If so, then at last confess that the Father and the Son are our one Lord and God. For “who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor? Or who has first given to him, that it should be repaid him? For from him and through him and in him are all things; to him be glory.” For he did not say “from the Father all things and through the Son all things,” but “from him and through him and in him.” From whom, but the Lord of whom he says, “For who has known the mind of the Lord?” So all things are from the Lord and through the Lord and in the Lord, not from one and through another, but from one Lord, because he did not say “to them be glory” but “to him be glory.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 8:6: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 11:34–36: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 8:6; Rom 11:34–36.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.19 (CSEL 57:547–548; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-19).

## Letter 238.20

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-20
- Source: CSEL 57:548–549
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Eph 4:5–6 that “one Lord” refers to Christ without excluding the Father, so that Father, Son and Spirit, though distinct, are the one true Lord God.

### Latin text

Quod si quisquam dicit id. quod ait apostolus unus dominus Iesus Christus, per quem omnia, non intellegi unus dominus nec unus. per quem omnia. sed unus Iesus Christus. qui unus Iesus Christus etiam dominus dicitur. non tamen ut unus dominus sit sed unus Iesus Christus. quid dicturus est. cum audierit eundem apostolum clamantem: Unus dominus, una fides, unum baptisma. unus deus et pater omnium? cum enim deum patrem hic commemoret. ubi ait: Unus deus et pater omnium. procul dubio superius. ubi dixit: Unus dominus. quem nisi dominum Iesum Christum uoluit intellegi? si ergo eis placet. desinat esse dominus pater, quia unus est dominus Iesus Christus. quod si absurdum et impium est opinari, discamus intellegere unitatem patris et filii et spiritus sancti, ut, quod de uno solo deo dictum fuerit, non continuo prohibeamur de filio uel de spiritu sancto intellegere, quia pater quidem non est filius et filius non est pater et spiritus utriusque non est pater aut filius, sed tamen et pater et filius et spiritus sanctus unus, qui solus et uerus est dominus deus.

### English translation (Claude)

But if anyone says that in the apostle's words, “one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things,” we are to understand not one Lord, nor the one through whom are all things, but one Jesus Christ, who, being one Jesus Christ, is also called Lord, yet not so as to be one Lord but one Jesus Christ, what will he say when he hears the same apostle proclaim, “One Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all”? For since he mentions God the Father here, where he says, “one God and Father of all,” without doubt above, where he said “one Lord,” whom did he wish to be understood but the Lord Jesus Christ? If, then, it pleases them, let the Father cease to be Lord, because there is one Lord, Jesus Christ. But if it is absurd and impious to think so, let us learn to understand the unity of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, so that what has been said of one God alone we are not at once forbidden to understand of the Son or of the Holy Spirit; because the Father indeed is not the Son, and the Son is not the Father, and the Spirit of both is neither Father nor Son, but yet the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one, who alone is the true Lord God.

### Scripture references

- Eph 4:5–6: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Eph 4:5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.20 (CSEL 57:548–549; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-20).

## Letter 238.21

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-21
- Source: CSEL 57:549–550
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from 1 Cor 6:19–20 that the Holy Spirit is God, and shows that texts seeming to rank the persons would prove too much.

### Latin text

Neque enim, spiritus sanctus si aut deus aut uerus deus non esset, templum eius essent corpora nostra. nescitis, inquit, quia corpora uestra templum in uobis est spiritus sancti, quem habetis a deo? et ne quisquam ipsum spiritum negaret deum, continuo secutus ait: Et non estis uestri; empti enim estis pretio. glorificate ergo deum in corpore uestro, eum scilicet, cuius templum corpora nostra esse praedixerat. iam hoc mirabile est, si uerum est, quod uos audio dicere, ita esse spiritum sanctum minorem filio, sicut patre minor est filius. cum enim corpora nostra membra sint Christi, sicut dicit apostolus. itemque corpora nostra templum sint spiritus sancti, sicut idem dicit apostolus, nimium miror, quo modo sint membra maioris templum minoris. an forte iam placet dicere spiritum sanctum domino Iesu Christo esse maiorem? uidetur enim suffragari huic opinioni etiam illa sententia. quoniam, qui dixerit uerbum aduersus filium hominis, remittetur ei; qui autem dixerit aduersus spiritum sanctum. non remittetur ei neque in hoc saeculo neque in futuro. periculosius enim peccatur in maiorem quam in minorem; nec separari fas est filium hominis a filio dei, quia ipse filius dei factus est filius hominis non mutando, quod erat, sed adsumendo, quod non erat. sed absit etiam talis impietas, ut spiritus sanctus maior filio esse credatur. non ergo facile in peruersum moueant. quae ita dicuntur. quasi ostendant alterum altero esse maiorem.

### English translation (Claude)

For if the Holy Spirit were not God or true God, our bodies would not be his temple. “Do you not know,” he says, “that your bodies are a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God?” And so that no one would deny that the Spirit himself is God, he went on at once: “And you are not your own; for you were bought with a price. Glorify God, then, in your body,” that is, him whose temple he had just said our bodies are. Now this is a wonder, if what I hear you say is true, that the Holy Spirit is less than the Son just as the Son is less than the Father. For since our bodies are members of Christ, as the apostle says, and likewise our bodies are a temple of the Holy Spirit, as the same apostle says, I am greatly astonished how the members of the greater can be the temple of the lesser. Or perhaps you now wish to say that the Holy Spirit is greater than the Lord Jesus Christ? For that saying too seems to support this opinion: “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.” For it is more dangerous to sin against the greater than against the lesser; and it is not right to separate the Son of Man from the Son of God, since the Son of God himself became the Son of Man, not by changing what he was but by taking what he was not. But far be such impiety too, that the Holy Spirit should be believed greater than the Son. So let not sayings that seem to show one greater than another easily move anyone to perversity.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 6:19–20: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 6:15: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 12:32: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 6:19–20; Matt 12:32. Allusion: 1 Cor 6:15. The Arian view that the Spirit is less than the Son is reported by Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.21 (CSEL 57:549–550; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-21).

## Letter 238.22

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-22
- Source: CSEL 57:550–551
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that John 17:3 should be read as including Christ as the one true God, and that the Father is true by begetting the Truth, not by sharing in it.

### Latin text

Nam quaedam etiam sic dicuntur, hominibus parum intellegentibus ut et ipse filius maior patre uideatur. quis enim. cum fuerit interrogatus, quid sit maius uerus aut ueritas. non potius respondeat ueritatem esse maiorem? ab illa enim uera sunt, quaecumque uera sunt. non autem ita est in deo. nam filium maiorem patre utrique non dicimus et tamen filius dictus est ueritas: Ego sum, inquit. uia et ueritas et uita. de patre autem tantum modo uos uultis intellegi, quod ait: Ut cognoscant te unum uerum deum et, quem misisti, Iesum Christum, ubi nos subaudimus etiam Iesum Christum uerum deum, ut haec sit sententia: te et, quem misisti. Iesum Christum cognoscant unum uerum deum ne illa consequatur absurditas, ut, si propterea non est uerus deus Iesus Christus, quia dictum est patri: Te unum uerum deum, propterea non sit dominus pater, quia dictum est de Christo: Unus dominus. uerum tamen secundum prauum intellectum uel potius errorem maior est deus ueritas quam deus uerus. quia uerus a ueritate est; maior ergo patre filius, quia iste est ueritas, ille uerus. hanc peruersitatem pellit ex animo, qui didicerit patrem deum uerum esse gignendo ueritatem, non participando; non est autem alia substantia ueri gignentis et alia genitae ueritatis.

### English translation (Claude)

For some things are said in such a way that, to people of little understanding, even the Son seems greater than the Father. For who, asked which is greater, the true or truth, would not rather answer that truth is greater? For whatever things are true are true by it. But it is not so in God. For neither of us says the Son is greater than the Father, and yet the Son is called the Truth: “I am,” he says, “the way and the truth and the life.” But you wish the saying, “that they may know you, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you sent,” to be understood of the Father only, where we understand Jesus Christ also as true God, so that the sense is: “that they may know you and Jesus Christ whom you sent as the one true God”; lest that absurdity follow that, if Jesus Christ is not true God because it was said to the Father, “you, the one true God,” then the Father is not Lord because it was said of Christ, “one Lord.” Yet by a perverse understanding, or rather error, God the Truth is greater than the true God, since the true is from the truth; so the Son would be greater than the Father, because he is the Truth and the Father is true. This perversity is driven from the mind of one who has learned that the Father is true God by begetting the Truth, not by participating in it; and the substance of the true one who begets is not other than that of the Truth begotten.

### Scripture references

- John 14:6: quotation, high confidence
- John 17:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 14:6; John 17:3; 1 Cor 8:6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.22 (CSEL 57:550–551; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-22).

## Letter 238.23

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-23
- Source: CSEL 57:551–552
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects the Arian claim that the Son before the incarnation was visible and corruptible, citing the Wisdom of Solomon on divine Wisdom.

### Latin text

Sed cum ad haec contemplanda infirmus sit oculus cordis humani, accedit, ut de contentione etiam turbulentus sit. et quando ista conspiciet? dicit scriptura filium dei, dominum et saluatorem nostrum Iesum Christum, uerbum dei esse et ueritatem et sapientiam et homines eum ante incarnationem, quam de Maria uirgine accepit, sine ulla omnino susceptione corporeae creaturae per ipsam naturam et substantiam suam, qua uerbum dei est et sapientia dei, uisibilem et corruptibilem dicunt, dum sibi nolunt constare, quod sentiunt. de patre tantum modo esse dictum: Inuisibili. incorruptibili soli deo! rogo te: uerbum hominis non est uisibile, nedum uerbum dei: iam uero sapientia illa, de qua dictum est: Adtingit ubique propter suam munditiam et: Nihil inquinatum in eam incurrit et: In se ipsa manens innouat omnia et si qua similia, quae numerari non possunt, si corruptibilis est. nescio quid dicam. nisi ut doleam praesumptionem humanam et mirer patientiam diuinam.

### English translation (Claude)

But since the eye of the human heart is weak for contemplating these things, it happens besides that it is also troubled by contention. And when will it behold them? Scripture says that the Son of God, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, is the Word of God and the Truth and the Wisdom; and men say that before the incarnation, which he received from the Virgin Mary, without taking up any bodily creature at all, by his very nature and substance, by which he is the Word of God and the Wisdom of God, he was visible and corruptible, while they want to hold, as they think, that “to the invisible, incorruptible, only God” was said of the Father alone! I ask you: a man's word is not visible, much less the Word of God. And as for that Wisdom of which it was said, “She reaches everywhere because of her purity,” and, “Nothing defiled enters into her,” and, “Remaining in herself she renews all things,” and other such things that cannot be counted, if she is corruptible, I do not know what to say, except to grieve at human presumption and wonder at divine patience.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 1:17: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:24 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 7:25 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence
- Wis 7:27 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Tim 1:17; Wis 7:24, 25, 27. The Arian view is reported by Augustine.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.23 (CSEL 57:551–552; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-23).

## Letter 238.24

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-24
- Source: CSEL 57:552
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from Wis 7:26 that the Father was never without the Son, who is eternally begotten, and confesses the limits of language before Isa 53:8.

### Latin text

Cum uero de illa dictum sit: Candor est enim lucis aeternae, nec uestri, ut arbitror, iam dicunt lucem patris. quae quid est nisi eius substantia, fuisse aliquando sine candore a se genito, sicut ista in diuinis et spiritalibus et incorporeis et incommutabilibus credi et utcumque intellegi possunt; audio enim iam eos emendasse. an forte falsum est hoc eos aliquando dixisse, quod fuerit aliquando pater sine filio, tamquam fuerit lux aeterna sine candore, quem genuit? quid ergo dicimus? si natus est filius dei de patre, iam pater destitit gignere; et si destitit, coepit; si autem coepit gignere. fuit aliquando sine filio; sed numquam fuit sine filio, quia filius eius sapientia eius est, quae candor est lucis aeternae: ergo semper gignit pater et semper nascitur filius. hic rursus timendum est, ne putetur inperfecta generatio, si non dicimus natum esse sed nasci. compatere mecum, obsecro, in his angustiis humanae cogitationis et linguae et pariter confugiamus ad spiritum dei per prophetam dicentem: Generationem eius quis enarrabit?

### English translation (Claude)

But since it is said of her, “For she is the brightness of eternal light,” not even your people, I think, now say that the light of the Father, which is nothing but his substance, was ever without the brightness begotten from it, as such things can be believed and somehow understood in divine, spiritual, incorporeal and unchangeable matters; for I hear they have now corrected this. Or is it perhaps false that they once said that the Father was once without the Son, as if eternal light had been without the brightness it begot? What, then, do we say? If the Son of God has been born of the Father, the Father has ceased begetting; and if he ceased, he began; but if he began to beget, he was once without a Son. But he was never without a Son, because his Son is his Wisdom, which is the brightness of eternal light; therefore the Father always begets and the Son is always born. Here again we must fear lest the generation be thought imperfect if we say not that he has been born but that he is being born. Have compassion on me, I beg you, in these straits of human thought and speech, and let us take refuge together in the Spirit of God, who says through the prophet: “Who shall declare his generation?”

### Scripture references

- Isa 53:8: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Wis 7:26 (Wisdom of Solomon): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Wis 7:26; Isa 53:8 (Old Latin/LXX).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.24 (CSEL 57:552; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-24).

## Letter 238.25

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-25
- Source: CSEL 57:552–553
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine challenges Pascentius to find Scripture calling different substances “one,” and cites the argument that God either would not or could not beget an equal Son.

### Latin text

Hoc unum interim peto ut diligenter exquiras, utrum alicubi scriptura diuina de diuersis substantiis dixerit, quod unum sint. si enim non inuenitur dictum nisi de his rebus, quas constat esse unius eiusdemque substantiae, quid opus est, ut rebellemus aduersus ueram et catholicam fidem? si autem inueneris alicubi hoc scriptum etiam de diuersis substantiis, tunc aliud cogar inquirere, unde ostendam recte ὁμοούσιον dictum patrem et filium. nam si illi, qui scripturas nostras aut nesciunt aut non laboriose scrutantur et tamen filium eiusdem substantiae et aequalem patri credunt, dicant eis, qui hoc nolunt credere, cum tamen deum patrem filium habere unigenitum credant: Noluit deus habere aequalem filium, an non potuit? si noluit, inuidus est; si non potuit, infirmus est; utrumuis autem horum de deo sentire sacrilegum est nescio. utrum possint inuenire, quid dicant, si nolint res absurdissimas et stultissimas dicere.

### English translation (Claude)

For now I ask this one thing: that you diligently inquire whether divine Scripture anywhere says of different substances that they are one. For if it is not found said except of things that are agreed to be of one and the same substance, what need is there for us to rebel against the true and Catholic faith? But if you find this written somewhere even of different substances, then I will be forced to look for something else by which to show that the Father and the Son are rightly called homoousios. For if those who either do not know our Scriptures or do not search them laboriously, and yet believe that the Son is of the same substance as the Father and equal to him, say to those who will not believe this, although they believe that God the Father has an only-begotten Son, “Did God not wish to have an equal Son, or was he unable? If he did not wish it, he is envious; if he was unable, he is weak; and to think either of these of God is sacrilege,” I do not know whether they can find anything to say, unless they want to say the most absurd and foolish things.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.25 (CSEL 57:552–553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-25).

## Letter 238.26

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-26
- Source: CSEL 57:553–554
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he has signed his statement of faith and invites Pascentius to reply in writing, signed or unsigned.

### Latin text

Ecce, quantum potui, exposui tibi fidem meam. et plura quidem dici possunt et diligentius disputari, sed uereor, ne ista ipsa, quae dixi, oneri sint occupationibus tuis. tamen ea non solum dictata conscribi uolui, sed etiam manu mea subscribenda curaui, quod quidem et antea uolueram, si, quod inter nos placuerat, seruaretur. sed modo certe puto iam non a te debere dici timuisse me tibi dicere fidem meam, quando non solum dixi. sed scriptam subscripsi, ne me quisquam dicat aut dixisse, quod non dixi, aut non dixisse, quod dixi. hoc fac et tu, si iudices quaeris. non qui in ore tuo reuereantur personam tuam, sed qui in litteris tuis exerant libertatem suam. si enim calumniam times, quod nullo modo auderem dicere, nisi hoc ipse dixisses, licet tibi non subscribere; nam et ego propterea nolui scribi nomen tuum in his meis litteris, ne hoc forte noluisses.

### English translation (Claude)

There, as best I could, I have set out my faith to you. More could indeed be said and argued more carefully, but I fear that even what I have said may be a burden to your busy life. Yet I wished it not only dictated and written down, but I also took care to sign it with my own hand, which indeed I had wished before too, if what we had agreed had been kept. But now surely I think it can no longer be said by you that I was afraid to tell you my faith, since I have not only told it but signed it in writing, so that no one may say that I said what I did not say or did not say what I said. Do the same yourself, if you seek judges, not ones who would revere your person in your presence, but ones who exercise their freedom over your writing. For if you fear a false charge, which I would in no way dare to say had you not said it yourself, you may refrain from signing; for I too did not want your name written in this letter of mine, in case you perhaps did not wish it.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.26 (CSEL 57:553–554; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-26).

## Letter 238.27

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-27
- Source: CSEL 57:554
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine warns Pascentius that to defeat or seem to defeat him is easy and that flatterers will applaud a powerful man.

### Latin text

Facile est. ut quisque Augustinum uincat. uidens, utrum ueritate an clamore; non est meum dicere, nisi quia facile est, ut quisque Augustinum uincat, quanto magis, ut uicisse uideatur aut, etsi non uideatur uicisse, dicatur! facile est hoc: nolo magnum putes, nolo pro magno appetas. nam cum aduerterint homines in hac re tam ingentem flammam cordis tui, multi gaudebunt se inuenisse occasionem, ut ad pauca euge, euge tam potentem uirum faciant amicum, nolo dicere, quia, si non foueant uel si contrariam sententiam proferant, etiam formidare poterunt inimicum inepte quidem et stulte. sed tamen plerique homines ita sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

It is easy for anyone to defeat Augustine; let others see whether by truth or by shouting. It is not for me to say, except that it is easy for anyone to defeat Augustine, how much more to seem to have won, or, even if he does not seem to have won, to be said to have won! This is easy: I do not want you to think it great, I do not want you to seek it as something great. For when people notice so great a flame in your heart on this matter, many will rejoice to have found an occasion, with a few cries of “Bravo, bravo,” to make so powerful a man their friend; I do not like to say that, if they do not support you or if they put forward the contrary view, they may even fear you as an enemy, foolishly and stupidly indeed, but most people are like that.

### Translation notes

- “Let others see”: the digital text reads uidens, evidently a slip (probably for uiderit); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.27 (CSEL 57:554; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-27).

## Letter 238.28

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-28
- Source: CSEL 57:554–555
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from John 10:30 and 17:11, 20–23 that “one” is said only of those of the same substance, so the Father and Son are homoousios.

### Latin text

Noli ergo adtendere, quo modo uincatur Augustinus qualiscumque unus homo, sed adtende potius, utrum uinci possit όμοούσιον, non ipsum uerbum Graecum, quod facile est non intellegentibus inridere, sed illud, quod scriptum est: Ego et pater unum sumus et: Pater sancte, serua eos in nomine tuo, quos dedisti mihi, ut sint unum sicut et nos. item paulo post: Non pro his autem rogo tantum, inquit, sed et pro eis, qui credituri sunt per uerbum eorum in me, ut omnes unum sint sicut tu, pater, in me et ego in te. ut et ipsi in nobis unum sint, ut mundus credat, quia tu me misisti. et ego claritatem, quam dedisti mihi, dedi illis, ut sint unum, sicut nos unum sumus ego in eis et tu in me. ut sint consummati in unum. uide, quotiens dixit sint unum, sicut et nos unum sumus. nusquam tamen dixit ipsi et nos sumus unum sed sicut ego et tu sumus unum. sic et ipsi in nobis sint unum, quia, sicut illi erant unius eiusdemque substantiae, quos etiam unius participationis uitae aeternae facere uolebat, ita de patre et filio propterea dictum est: Unum sumus. quia unius sunt eiusdemque substantiae et non participes uitae aeternae sed ipsa principaliter uita aeterna. et poterat dicere secundum formam serui ego et ipsi unum sumus aut unum simus; nec hoc tamen dixit, quia unam substantiam patris et suam et unam illorum uolebat ostendere. si autem dixisset et tu et ipsi unum sitis, sicut et ego et tu unum sumus aut et tu et ego et ipsi unum simus. sicut et ego et tu unum sumus, nemo nostrum recusaret posse dici unum sunt etiam diuersas substantias. nunc autem uides, quam non ita sit, quia non ita dixit et saepe. dicendo uehementer commendauit, quod dixit.

### English translation (Claude)

So do not pay attention to how Augustine, a single man of whatever worth, may be defeated, but rather to whether homoousios can be defeated: not the Greek word itself, which is easy for those who do not understand it to mock, but what is written, “I and the Father are one,” and, “Holy Father, keep in your name those whom you have given me, that they may be one, as we are.” And again a little later: “I do not pray for these only,” he says, “but also for those who will believe in me through their word, that they all may be one, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be one in us, that the world may believe that you sent me. And the glory you gave me I have given them, that they may be one, as we are one, I in them and you in me, that they may be made perfect in one.” See how often he said “that they may be one, as we also are one”; yet nowhere did he say “that they and we are one,” but “as I and you are one, so they too may be one in us”; because, as they were of one and the same substance, whom he also wished to make sharers in one eternal life, so it was said of the Father and the Son, “We are one,” because they are of one and the same substance, and are not sharers in eternal life but are themselves, originally, eternal life. And he could have said, according to the form of a servant, “I and they are one,” or “let us be one”; yet he did not say it, because he wished to show the one substance of the Father and himself, and the one substance of the disciples. But if he had said, “that you and they may be one, as I and you are one,” or, “that you and I and they may be one, as I and you are one,” none of us would refuse to grant that even different substances can be said to be one. But now you see how it is not so, because he did not say so, and by saying it often he strongly emphasized what he did say.

### Scripture references

- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence
- John 17:11: quotation, high confidence
- John 17:20–23: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 10:30; John 17:11; John 17:20–23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.28 (CSEL 57:554–555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-28).

## Letter 238.29

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-29
- Source: CSEL 57:555–556
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine concludes that Scripture calls things simply “one” only when they share one substance, urges Pascentius to let the truth conquer him willingly, and signs the letter.

### Latin text

Inuenis ergo in scripturis aliquid unum de diuersis naturis. sicut supra ostendimus, sed additur uel subauditur quid unum. sicut ex anima et corpore dicimus unum animal et una persona et unus homo uel est uel sunt. sine aliqua uero adiunctione dici unum sunt si inueneris in scripturis nisi de his, qui unius substantiae sunt, iustissime flagitabis. ut alia proferamus, unde ὁμοούσιον demonstremus. sunt enim et alia multa; sed interim de hoc uno cogita deposito studio contentionis, ut habeas propitium deum. non enim bonum hominis est hominem uincere, sed bonum est homini. ut eum ueritas uincat uolentem, quia malum est homini, ut eum ueritas uincat inuitum. nam ipsa uincat necesse est siue negantem siue confitentem. da ueniam, si quid liberius dixi non ad contumeliam tuam sed ad defensionem meam. praesumpsi enim de grauitate et prudentia tua, quia potes considerare, quantam mihi respondendi necessitatem inposueris, aut. si et hoc non recte feci, et hinc da ueniam. Huic scripturae a me dictatae et relectae Augustinus subscripsi.

### English translation (Claude)

You do find in the Scriptures something called one from different natures, as we showed above, but something is added or understood: “one” what, as from soul and body we say that there is, or they are, one animal, one person, one man. But if you find in the Scriptures “they are one” said without any addition except of those who are of one substance, you will most justly demand that we bring forward other things by which to demonstrate homoousios. For there are many others; but for now think about this one, putting aside the zeal for contention, so that you may have God favorable. For it is not good for a man to conquer a man; but it is good for a man that the truth conquer him willing, because it is bad for a man that the truth conquer him unwilling. For it must conquer, whether he denies or confesses. Pardon me if I have said anything rather freely, not to insult you but to defend myself. For I presumed on your gravity and prudence, since you can consider how great a necessity of replying you laid on me; or, if I did not do right in this either, pardon me for this too. I, Augustine, have signed this writing, dictated and reread by me.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 238.29 (CSEL 57:555–556; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/238-9/#p-238-29).

## Letter 239.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-1
- Source: CSEL 57:556–557
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Pascentius that the creed he recited is common to both, and asks him to state and defend from Scripture the Arian points on which they differ.

### Latin text

Si dicis te mihi dixisse fidem tuam et me tibi noluisse dicere fidem meam, quod et audio te non tacere, recordare, obsecro, quam utrumque sit falsum. nam nec tu mihi uoluisti dicere fidem tuam et ego tibi fidem meam non dicere nolui, sed ita dicere uolui, ut nemo posset dicere aut dixisse me aliquid, quod non dixerim, aut non dixisse, quod dixerim. diceres autem mihi fidem tuam, si hoc diceres, unde dissentis a nobis, si diceres: Credo in deum patrem, qui filium fecit primam creaturam ante omnes ceteras creaturas, et in ipsum filium nec aequalem patri nec similem nec uerum deum et in spiritum sanctum factum per filium post filium; haec enim uos audio dicere aut, si forte falsum est, quod ista dicatis, hoc potius abs te nolo scire. si autem uerum est, quia ista dicatis, uolo scire. quem ad modum ea de scripturis sanctis defendatis. nunc autem dixisti credere te in deum patrem omnipotentem. inuisibilem. inmortalem, non ab aliquo genitum et ex quo sunt omnia, et in filium eius Iesum Christum deum natum ante saecula, per quem facta sunt omnia, et in spiritum sanctum. haec fides non est tua sed utriusque nostrum, quem ad modum si adiungeres, quod eundem filium dei Iesum Christum etiam Maria uirgo peperit, quod pariter credimus, et si qua alia communiter confitemur. si uoluisses ergo tuam dicere, non istam diceres, quae communis est nobis, sed illam potius, in qua dissentimus a uobis.

### English translation (Claude)

If you say that you told me your faith and I would not tell you mine, as I hear you keep saying, remember, I beg you, how false both are. For you did not wish to tell me your faith, and I was not unwilling to tell you mine; but I wished to tell it in such a way that no one could say that I had said something I did not say, or had not said what I did say. You would have told me your faith if you had said where you differ from us, if you had said: “I believe in God the Father, who made the Son the first creature before all other creatures, and in the Son himself, neither equal to the Father nor like him nor true God, and in the Holy Spirit made through the Son after the Son”; for I hear that you people say this. Or, if perhaps it is false that you say these things, that rather I do not wish to learn from you; but if it is true that you say them, I want to know how you defend them from the holy Scriptures. But now you said that you believe “in God the Father almighty, invisible, immortal, begotten by no one, and from whom are all things, and in his Son Jesus Christ, God born before the ages, through whom all things were made, and in the Holy Spirit.” This faith is not yours but both of ours, as it would be if you added that the Virgin Mary bore this same Son of God, Jesus Christ, which we believe alike, and whatever else we confess in common. If, then, you had wished to state your own faith, you would not have stated this one, which is common to us, but rather the one in which we differ from you.

### Translation notes

- To Pascentius. The Arian positions are those Augustine reports hearing attributed to them.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 239.1 (CSEL 57:556–557; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-1).

## Letter 239.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-2
- Source: CSEL 57:557–558
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine repeats that Pascentius's refusal to have the debate recorded shows his lack of confidence, not Augustine's.

### Latin text

Haec et praesens dicerem, si, quem ad modum placuerat, uerba nostra exciperentur. sed quia hoc noluisti dicens te a nobis timere calumniam et a placito, cui mane consenseras, post prandium recessisti, ut quid dicerem, quod. quem ad modum uelles, me dixisse narrares et ego non haberem, unde ostenderem, quid uel quem ad modum dixerim? noli ergo ulterius iactare. quod tu fidem tuam dixeris et ego meam non dixerim, quia sunt homines, qui considerent me potius habuisse fiduciam fidei meae, qui eam scribi uoluerim, te autem non habuisse, dum quasi calumniam pertimescis. paratus ergo eras negare, si tibi obiceretur, quod contra fidem meam aliquid dixeris. uide ergo, quid de te ipse sentiri feceris. quod si obiectum non eras negaturus, cur dictum scribi noluisti. praesertim cum magnopere uoluisses etiam honoratos uiros nostro interesse sermoni? cur ergo uolens calumniam deuitare notariorum stilum timebas et clarissimorum testimonium non timebas?

### English translation (Claude)

I would say these things in person too, if our words were taken down as had been agreed. But since you refused this, saying you feared a false charge from us, and after lunch withdrew from the agreement you had consented to in the morning, why should I say anything that you could report I had said in whatever way you wished, while I would have nothing by which to show what I had said or how? Do not, then, boast any longer that you stated your faith and I did not state mine, for there are people who will consider that I rather had confidence in my faith, since I wished it to be written, and you did not, since you dreaded a so-called false charge. So you were ready to deny it, if it were put to you that you had said something against my faith. See, then, what you have made people think of you. But if you were not going to deny it when it was put to you, why did you not want what was said to be written, especially when you had so much wanted men of rank to be present at our conversation? Why, then, wishing to avoid a false charge, did you fear the stenographers' pen and not fear the testimony of the most distinguished men?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 239.2 (CSEL 57:557–558; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-2).

## Letter 239.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-3
- Source: CSEL 57:558–559
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine states the distinctively Catholic point, three distinct persons who are one God, and offers to reply in writing to any objection.

### Latin text

Si autem sic uis ut etiam ego dicam fidem meam. quo modo te dicis dixisse tuam, ego etiam breuius possum dicere credere me in patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum. si autem proprium aliquid. unde dissentis a me, uis audire, credo in deum patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum nec filium dicens patrem nec patrem filium nec utrumque spiritum uel patrem uel filium et tamen patrem deum et filium deum et spiritum sanctum deum et patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum unum deum solum aeternum et inmortalem propria sua substantia, sicut deus solus aeternus et inmortalis est ea diuinitate, quae est ante saecula. hoc si tibi displicet et placet a me audire, quem ad modum de scripturis sanctis adseratur, lege etiam illud, quod prolixius conscriptum misi benignitati tuae. si autem tibi non uacat legere, nec mihi uacat frustra uerba iactare. possum tamen, quantum deus dederit facultatis uel dictandi tibi uel scribendi, ego quoque uel dictando uel scribendo, ad quod nolueris, respondere. Huic scripturae meae a me dictatae et relectae Augustinus subscripsi.

### English translation (Claude)

But if you want me too to state my faith in the way you say you stated yours, I can say even more briefly that I believe in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. But if you want to hear something distinctive, where you differ from me, I believe in God the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, not calling the Son the Father nor the Father the Son, nor the Spirit of both either the Father or the Son; and yet the Father is God and the Son God and the Holy Spirit God, and the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God, alone eternal and immortal by his own substance, as God alone is eternal and immortal by that divinity which is before the ages. If this displeases you, and you would like to hear from me how it is asserted from the holy Scriptures, read also what I have sent to your kindness written at greater length. But if you have no leisure to read, neither have I leisure to toss words about in vain. Yet I can, as far as God gives me ability, whether you dictate or write, myself reply by dictating or writing to whatever you dislike. I, Augustine, have signed this writing of mine, dictated and reread by me.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 239.3 (CSEL 57:558–559; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-239-3).

## Letter 240.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-240-1
- Source: CSEL 57:559–560
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Pascentius replies scornfully, likening Augustine's view to muddy water and a crooked tree, asking which of the three is the one God, and proposing an unrecorded meeting.

### Latin text

Optaueram te, frater dilectissime, pristini erroris tui consilium deponere; nunc miror te in ipso adhuc permanere, sicut epistula, quam ad me misisti, clamat. nam ita est dignatio tua, sicut sitiens nimio calore accensus si inuenerit aquam caenosam et se ingurgitauerit; postea, etiam si limpidam et frigidam reperiens biberit, non satis proficere potest, quando quidem caeno semel eius cor et anima obruitur. denique, quod pace tua dicam, ita est consilium praestantiae tuae sicut arbor curua et nodosa, quae nihil in se rectum habet et aciem peruertit oculorum. rescribit mihi sanctitas tua patrem deum, filium deum, spiritum sanctum deum, sed unum deum. quis e tribus unus deus? an forte una est persona triformis. quae hoc nomine nuncupetur? tu si uoluisses et confideres de professione tua. resideres mecum cum coepiscopis tuis puro ac pacifico animo et spiritu et conferres de his. quae dei sunt et quae ad gloriam et gratiam spiritalem pertinent. unde quid opus est scribere et rescribere, quod nos non aedificat?

### English translation (Claude)

I had hoped, dearest brother, that you would lay aside the opinion of your former error; now I am surprised that you still persist in it, as the letter you sent me proclaims. For Your Excellency is like a thirsty man burning with great heat who finds muddy water and gulps it down; afterwards, even if he finds and drinks clear cold water, it can do him little good, since his heart and soul have once been overwhelmed with mud. In short, if I may say so with your leave, Your Eminence's opinion is like a crooked and knotty tree that has nothing straight in it and distorts the eyesight. Your Holiness writes back to me: God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, but one God. Which one of the three is the one God? Or perhaps it is one three-formed person that is called by this name? If you had wished, and had confidence in your profession, you would sit down with me, with your fellow bishops, with a pure and peaceful mind and spirit, and confer about the things of God and those that pertain to spiritual glory and grace. What need is there, then, to write and write back what does not edify us?

### Translation notes

- Letter of Pascentius to Augustine. His charge that Augustine believes in a “three-formed person” is his own characterization.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 240.1 (CSEL 57:559–560; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-240-1).

## Letter 241.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-241-1
- Source: CSEL 57:560–561
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Pascentius's insults by pointing to his broken agreement, and denies that he believes in a “three-formed person,” since the one deity makes Father, Son and Spirit one God.

### Latin text

Litterae tuae nec ad reddenda conuicia me prouocare nec a reddendis litteris reuocare potuerunt. ea quippe, quae scripsisti, mouerent me. si a ueritate dei, non a potestate hominis dicerentur. dixisti consilium meum arborem curuam et nodosam, quae nihil in se rectum habet et aciem peruertit oculorum. quid in me diceres, si a placito, quod inter nos mane statueramus, ego recessissem et in re facillima, quae recte placuerat, curuam refragationem et nodos difficultatis posuissem? neque enim aqua caenosa ingurgitatum me iudicares sed perfidiae. quod multo peius est, ebrietate submersum, si non talis post prandium redissem, qualis ante prandium recessissem. sed ecce numquid non rescripsisti. quod uoluisti, et nullam calumniam formidasti? sic ergo potes et cetera, ut sit, quod uel nos ipsi uel alii possint considerare et iudicare. quod enim dicis triformem dei personam me credere, si legere dignatus fuisses, quod aliud aliquanto prolixius misi. et ad ea, quae ibi scripta sunt, respondere uoluisses, hoc fortasse non diceres. sed tamen ecce et hoc ipsum. quod triformem dei personam dicam, et dictasti et conscriptum misisti et nullam calumniam timuisti; ecce ostendisti uerum esse. quod dico, non ideo te. sicut placuerat, cum simul essemus, uerba tua dictare noluisse. quia calumniam timebas. sed quia de ueritate non confidebas. et modo quia iam tibi placuit dictare, an triformem dei personam credam. respondeo non me ita credere; una quippe forma est, quia una. ut ita dicam, deitas est, et ideo unus deus pater et filius et spiritus sanctus.

### English translation (Claude)

Your letter could neither provoke me to return insults nor call me back from returning a letter. What you wrote would move me if it were said by the truth of God, not by the power of man. You called my opinion a crooked and knotty tree that has nothing straight in it and distorts the eyesight. What would you say of me if I had withdrawn from the agreement we made between us in the morning, and in a very easy matter that had rightly pleased us both had put crooked opposition and knots of difficulty? You would judge me not gulped full of muddy water but drowned in the drunkenness of bad faith, which is much worse, if I had not come back after lunch the same as I had gone away before lunch. But see, did you not write back what you wished, and did you fear no false charge? So you can do the rest too, so that there is something that we or others can consider and judge. As for your saying that I believe in a three-formed person of God, if you had deigned to read what else I sent at somewhat greater length and had been willing to answer what is written there, perhaps you would not say this. But still, look: this very thing, that I speak of a three-formed person of God, you have both dictated and sent in writing, and feared no false charge. See, you have shown that what I say is true: that you refused to dictate your words, as had been agreed when we were together, not because you feared a false charge but because you lacked confidence in the truth. And now, since it has pleased you to dictate whether I believe in a three-formed person of God, I answer that I do not believe so; for there is one form, because there is, so to speak, one deity, and therefore the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 241.1 (CSEL 57:560–561; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-241-1).

## Letter 241.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-241-2
- Source: CSEL 57:561–563
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks Pascentius to explain 1 Cor 6:16–17, which shows unity without a “two-formed” spirit, and agrees to meet only if their words are recorded.

### Latin text

Tu autem. peto, digneris breuiter respondere, quo modo accipias. quod ait apostolus: Qui adhaeret meretrici, unum corpus est: qui autem adhaeret domino. unus spiritus est. diuersi enim sexus corpora sibi adhaerentia unum corpus dixit et. cum spiritus humanus nullo modo posset dicere: Ego et dominus unum sumus, tamen, cum adhaeret domino, unus spiritus est; quanto, magis ille, qui uerissime dixit: Ego et pater unum sumus. quia inseparabiliter patri cohaeret, ipse et pater unus deus est, si tamen uel hoc uerbum admittitur in illa diuinitate. ut dicamus cohaeret, quod numquam omnino uel fuit uel esse poterit ulla distantia separatum! ad hoc responde, utrum tibi placeat biformem spiritum dici, quando, qui adhaeret domino, unus spiritus est. quod si tibi non placet, nec ego triformem deum dixi patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum sed unum deum. si autem in praesentia uis ut conloquamur, gratiam quidem habeo dignationi et beniuolentiae tuae. sed sicut iam mihi aliud, quod uoluisti, rescribere dignatus es, ita dignare rescribere dictaturos nos esse, quae dicturi sumus, et non deero uoluntati tuae, quantum me adiuuerit dominus. nam si scribis et scribo non nos aedificat, quo modo nos aedificat dicis, dico, ubi post uerborum strepitum non inueniamus, quid legendo recenseamus? Augustinus haec dictaui et relectis subscripsi. abstineamus nos a conuiciis, ne tempus inaniter inpendamus, et ad id, quod agitur inter nos, potius aduertamus.

### English translation (Claude)

But please deign to answer briefly how you understand what the apostle says: “He who joins himself to a harlot is one body; but he who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit.” For he called bodies of different sexes joined to each other one body; and although the human spirit could in no way say, “I and the Lord are one,” yet when it joins itself to the Lord it is one spirit. How much more is he who said most truly, “I and the Father are one,” because he is inseparably joined to the Father, one God with the Father, if indeed even this word “joined” is admissible in that divinity, which never has been nor could be separated by any distance! Answer this: whether you would have the spirit called two-formed when he who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit. If you would not, neither did I call the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit a three-formed God, but one God. But if you want us to confer in person, I am grateful for your courtesy and goodwill; but as you have already deigned to write me back something else you wished, so deign to write back that we will dictate what we are going to say, and I will not fail your wish, as far as the Lord helps me. For if you say, “writing and writing back does not edify us,” how do you say it edifies us when, after the din of words, we find nothing to review by reading? I, Augustine, dictated this and, having reread it, signed it. Let us refrain from insults, so as not to spend time in vain, and let us rather attend to what is at issue between us.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 6:16–17: quotation, high confidence
- John 10:30: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 6:16–17; John 10:30.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 241.2 (CSEL 57:561–563; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-241-2).

## Letter 242.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-1
- Source: CSEL 57:563–564
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks the Arian Elpidius for trying to correct him and for sending an Arian bishop's treatise, and wishes him true knowledge from God, quoting 1 Cor 2:12–14.

### Latin text

Quis nostrum erret in fide uel cognitione trinitatis, alia quaestio est. gratum sane habeo, quod me quamuis incognitum facie tamen. quia errare credidisti, reuocare ab errore conatus es. huius tibi beniuolentiae mercedem retribuat deus et nosse te faciat, quod nosse te putas; res enim ardua est. ut existimo. et quaeso te. ne in ullam contumeliae partem acceperis, quod tibi tantae cognitionis munus optaui. uereor enim, ne opinatae scientiae praeiudicium si non praecepta uera, quae nequaquam ad te mihi adrogauerim, at certe bona uota nostra, quae mihi etiam indocto habere de te licet — non enim perite sed amice exhibenda sunt —, repellat ab auribus tuis potiusque mihi suscenseas, quod non tibi iam sicut sapienti gratulatus, quam gratias agas, quod tibi sapientiam deprecatus sim. uerum tamen si ego portans episcopalis nominis sarcinam libentissime amplector beniuolentiam tuam, quod me Bonoso et Iasoni, ut scribis, doctissimis uiris, etiam trans mare mittere dignatus es ad reportandos ex eorum disputationibus uberes fructus, quod denique ad detergendas totius erroris caligines libellum cuiusdam episcopi uestri ingenio et uiribus elaboratum ad me perferendum sollicita benignitate curasti, quanto est aequius te bono animo accipere. quod, ea, quae nulla humana ope et uiribus dari possunt, a domino deo tibi ut concedantur, optaui! apostolus enim inquit: Non spiritum huius mundi accepimus sed spiritum, qui ex deo est. ut sciamus, quae a deo donata sunt nobis: quae et loquimur non in doctis humanae sapientiae uerbis sed docti spiritu spiritalibus spiritalia comparantes. animalis autem homo non percipit, quae sunt spiritus dei; stultitia est enim illi.

### English translation (Claude)

Which of us errs in faith or in knowledge of the Trinity is another question. I am indeed grateful that, though I am unknown to you by face, you tried to call me back from error because you believed I was erring. May God repay you for this goodwill and make you know what you think you know; for it is, I think, an arduous matter. And I beg you not to take it as any insult that I have wished you the gift of so great a knowledge. For I fear lest the prejudgment of a supposed knowledge drive from your ears, if not true precepts, which I would by no means presume to offer you, at least our good wishes, which even I, unlearned, may have for you (for they are to be shown not skillfully but in friendship), and lest you be angry with me for not congratulating you already as a wise man rather than thank me for praying that you may have wisdom. Yet if I, carrying the burden of the name of bishop, most gladly embrace your goodwill in deigning, as you write, to send me even across the sea to the most learned men Bonosus and Jason, to bring back rich fruits from their discussions, and in finally taking care with anxious kindness to have brought to me a little book worked out with the talent and strength of one of your bishops to wipe away all the fog of error, how much fairer it is that you take in good spirit my wish that the Lord God may grant you what can be given by no human help or strength! For the apostle says: “We have not received the spirit of this world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we may know the things given us by God; which we also speak, not in the learned words of human wisdom, but taught by the Spirit, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:12–14: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 8:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Elpidius, an Arian. Bonosus and Jason were apparently Arian teachers; otherwise unknown. Quotation: 1 Cor 2:12–14. Allusion: 1 Cor 8:2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 242.1 (CSEL 57:563–564; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-1).

## Letter 242.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-2
- Source: CSEL 57:564–565
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from John 1:3 that the Son, through whom all things were made, cannot himself have been made.

### Latin text

Magis ergo tecum, si fieri posset, mallem quaerere, quousque appellandus sit animalis homo, ut, si eum iam transcendimus, recte fortasse illa, quae supra humanam mentem atque intellegentiam incommutabiliter manent, aliqua ex parte nos attigisse gaudeamus. cauendum est enim, ne propterea uideatur stultum, cum filium patri audiamus aequalem, quia hominem animalem adhuc agimus, de quo dictum est, quod stultitia sunt illi, quae sunt spiritus dei. quamquam sane maiestas illa supra cuncta sublimis ab spiritalibus cogitari possit, a nullo autem possit effari, uidere tamen, quantum arbitror, facile est non esse factum, per quem facta sunt omnia et sine quo factum est nihil. si enim per se ipsum factus est. erat. antequam fieret, ut fieri per se posset, quod certe tanto absurdius dicitur, quanto uanius cogitatur. si autem non per se factus est, non est factus omnino, quoniam, quicquid factum est. per ipsum factum est; omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil.

### English translation (Claude)

I would rather, then, if it were possible, inquire with you how far one is to be called the natural man, so that, if we have already passed beyond him, we may perhaps rightly rejoice that we have in some measure reached those things that abide unchangeably above the human mind and understanding. For we must take care that it does not seem foolish to us, when we hear that the Son is equal to the Father, because we are still living as the natural man, of whom it was said that the things of the Spirit of God are foolishness to him. Although that majesty, exalted above all things, may be thought of by the spiritual but uttered by no one, yet it is easy to see, I think, that he was not made, through whom all things were made and without whom nothing was made. For if he was made through himself, he existed before he was made, so that he could be made through himself, which is certainly the more absurd to say the emptier it is to think. But if he was not made through himself, he was not made at all, since whatever was made was made through him; for all things were made through him and without him nothing was made.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 2:14: allusion, high confidence
- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 2:14; John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 242.2 (CSEL 57:564–565; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-2).

## Letter 242.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-3
- Source: CSEL 57:565–566
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reasons from John 1:3 that the Word was neither made through himself nor without himself, and so was not made but begotten.

### Latin text

Miror parum adtendi. quae tam expresse euangelista uoluit intimare. ut neminem dissimulare permitteret; non enim satis fuit dicere: Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, nisi adderet: Et sine ipso factum est nihil. at ego quamuis tardus et nondum detersa caligine saucium mentis oculum gerens ad intuendam patris et filii incomparabilem ineffabilemque praestantiam tamen hoc tota facilitate complector. quod nobis in euangelio propterea praeseminatum est, non ut hinc comprehenderemus illam diuinitatem, sed ut hinc admoneremur non oportere nos de temeraria comprehensione iactare. si enim omnia per ipsum facta sunt, quicquid non per ipsum factum est, non est factum. ipse autem per se factus non est; non est igitur factus. et omnia per ipsum facta esse ab euangelista credere cogimur; ab eodem ergo cogimur eum factum esse non credere. item, si sine ipso factum est nihil, ipse ergo nihil est, quia sine se factus est. quod si opinari sacrilegum est, restat. ut fateamur aut non sine se factum esse aut factum non esse. non autem sine se factum esse non possumus dicere. si enim ipse se fecit, iam erat ante, quam fieret; si autem ad se faciendum alteri, a quo factus est, adiutorium praebuit, nihilo minus, ut se adiuuante ipse fieret. iam erat ante, quam fieret. relinquitur itaque, ut sine se factus sit. quicquid autem sine illo factum est, nihil est. aut nihil est igitur aut factus non est; sed non est nihil, factus igitur non est. at si factus non est et tamen filius est, sine dubio natus est.

### English translation (Claude)

I am surprised that so little attention is paid to what the evangelist wished to state so expressly that he allowed no one to ignore it; for it was not enough to say, “All things were made through him,” unless he added, “and without him nothing was made.” And I, though slow and still bearing a wounded eye of the mind, its fog not yet wiped away, for gazing on the incomparable and ineffable excellence of the Father and the Son, nevertheless grasp this with complete ease: that it was sown beforehand for us in the Gospel, not so that we might comprehend that divinity from it, but so that we might be warned by it not to boast of a rash comprehension. For if all things were made through him, whatever was not made through him was not made. But he was not made through himself; therefore he was not made. And we are compelled by the evangelist to believe that all things were made through him; by the same evangelist, therefore, we are compelled not to believe that he was made. Again, if without him nothing was made, then he himself is nothing, because he was made without himself. But if it is sacrilege to think this, it remains that we confess either that he was not made without himself or that he was not made. But we cannot say that he was not made without himself. For if he made himself, he already existed before he was made; and if he gave help to another, by whom he was made, in making himself, nonetheless, for him to be made with his own help, he already existed before he was made. So it remains that he was made without himself. But whatever was made without him is nothing. Therefore he is either nothing or not made; but he is not nothing; therefore he was not made. But if he was not made, and yet is the Son, without doubt he was born.

### Scripture references

- John 1:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 1:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 242.3 (CSEL 57:565–566; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-3).

## Letter 242.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-4
- Source: CSEL 57:566–567
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the Son's generation cannot be declared, but Phil 2:6 calls him equal to God, and only the pure in heart can see this.

### Latin text

Quo modo. inquis, potuit de solo patre nasci filius aequalis ei. de quo natus est? iam hoc enarrare non possum et cedo prophetae dicenti: Generationem eius quis enarrabit? quod si tu de humana generatione, qua per uirginem natus est, accipiendum putas, ipse te discute et interroga animam tuam, utrum, si in generatione humana deficit. audeat enarrare diuinam. noli ergo, inquis, dicere aequalem. cur non dicam, quod dixit apostolus? non rapinam, inquit, arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo. etsi enim aequalitatem illam non explicauit humanae menti nondum purgatae, posuit tamen in uerbo, quod in re possit inuenire purgata. demus itaque operam mundando cordi nostro, ut inde exsurgat acies, qua ista uidere ualeamus; beati enim mundicordes, inquit, quia ipsi deum uidebunt. ita excedentes animalis hominis caliginosas imagines ad serenitatem illam sinceritatemque ueniemus, qua uidere possimus, quod dici non posse uideamus.

### English translation (Claude)

“How,” you say, “could a Son equal to him be born of the Father alone, of whom he was born?” This I cannot declare, and I yield to the prophet who says, “Who shall declare his generation?” But if you think this should be taken of the human generation by which he was born of the Virgin, examine yourself and ask your soul whether, if it fails in the human generation, it dares to declare the divine. “Do not, then,” you say, “call him equal.” Why should I not say what the apostle said? “He did not think it robbery,” he says, “to be equal to God.” For although he did not explain that equality to the human mind not yet purified, he put it in a word, so that the purified mind could find it in reality. Let us therefore give our effort to cleansing our hearts, so that from there may arise the sight by which we can see these things; for “blessed are the pure in heart,” he says, “for they shall see God.” So, going beyond the foggy images of the natural man, we shall come to that serenity and clarity in which we can see what we see cannot be said.

### Scripture references

- Isa 53:8: quotation, high confidence
- Phil 2:6: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 5:8: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Isa 53:8 (LXX/Old Latin); Phil 2:6; Matt 5:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 242.4 (CSEL 57:566–567; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-4).

## Letter 242.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-5
- Source: CSEL 57:567–568
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine criticizes the Arian treatise's claim to set forth the “naked truth,” citing 1 Cor 13:12, and excuses the length of his letter by Cicero's example.

### Latin text

Nam libello, quem dignatus es mittere, si mihi sit otium facultasque tribuatur ad singula respondere, arbitror te cogniturum tanto minus quemque uestiri lumine ueritatis, quanto magis sibi uidetur nudam depromere ueritatem. quis enim ferat, ut alia omittam et hoc solum interim commemorem, quod maxime ingemui, cum apostolus Paulus dicat: Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem, istos iam dicere omni integumento retecto nudam se depromere ueritatem? qui si diceret: Nudam uidemus ueritatem, nihil esset caecius ista arrogantia uisionis; non autem dixit uidemus sed depromimus, ut non solum iam ueritas intentioni mentis patere sed etiam potestati linguae subiacere uideatur. multa sunt, quae de trinitatis ineffabilitate dicantur, ut ipsa non dicatur — alioquin non est ineffabilis —, sed ut illis dictis illa dici non posse intellegatur. uerum iam, ut arbitror, modum excessit epistula mea, cum per tuam me admonueris breuiter scribere. sed quia institutione ueterum te excusare dignatus es, non tibi absurdus uidebor, si modum quarundam epistularum Ciceronis, quia eius quoque in litteris tuis mentionem fecisti, non te pigeat recordari.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the little book you deigned to send, if I had leisure and the opportunity were given me to answer it point by point, I think you would learn that each man is clothed with the light of truth the less, the more he thinks he is setting forth the naked truth. For who could bear it (to pass over other things and mention only this for now, which made me groan most) that, when the apostle Paul says, “We see now through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face,” these people now say that, every covering removed, they set forth the naked truth? If they said, “We see the naked truth,” nothing would be blinder than that arrogance of vision; but they did not say “we see” but “we set forth,” so that truth seems not only to lie open to the gaze of the mind but also to be subject to the power of the tongue. There are many things said about the ineffability of the Trinity, not so that it may be said (otherwise it is not ineffable), but so that by those sayings it may be understood that it cannot be said. But my letter has now, I think, exceeded the limit, since you warned me in yours to write briefly. But since you deigned to excuse yourself by the practice of the ancients, I will not seem absurd to you if you will not mind recalling the length of certain letters of Cicero, since you mentioned him too in your letter.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 13:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Cor 13:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 242.5 (CSEL 57:567–568; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/239-1/#p-242-5).

## Letter 243.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-1
- Source: CSEL 57:568–569
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Laetus, a young monk tempted to leave, urging him as Christ's recruit to build the tower and fight like the king in the Gospel parable.

### Latin text

Legi epistulam, quam misisti fratribus. consolari te cupiens, quod multis temptationibus tua tirocinia quatiantur, in qua etiam insinuasti desiderare te litteras meas. condolui, frater, et cessare ab scribendo non potui, ne non solum tuo sed etiam meo desiderio negarem, quod me uidebam officio debere caritatis. si te igitur tironem Christi profiteris, castra ne deseras, in quibus tibi etiam aedificanda turris est illa, de qua in euangelio dominus loquitur. in ea quippe stantem et sub armis uerbi dei militantem nulla ex parte penetrare ullae temptationes ualent; inde et iacta in aduersarium tela graui pondere ueniunt et prospecta firmo munimine deuitantur. considera etiam dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, cum sit rex noster, tamen ea societate, qua etiam frater esse dignatus est, reges appellasse milites suos et unumquemque ad bellandum cum rege, qui habet uiginti milia, instructione decem milium idoneum esse debere praemonuit.

### English translation (Claude)

I have read the letter you sent the brothers, wishing to console you because your novitiate is being shaken by many temptations; in it you also indicated that you wanted a letter from me. I grieved with you, brother, and could not refrain from writing, lest I deny not only your desire but also my own what I saw I owed by the duty of love. If, then, you profess yourself a recruit of Christ, do not desert the camp in which you must also build that tower of which the Lord speaks in the Gospel. For no temptations can penetrate at any point one who stands in it and fights under the arms of the word of God; from it weapons hurled at the adversary come with heavy weight, and those seen in advance are avoided by its firm defense. Consider also that our Lord Jesus Christ, though he is our King, yet by that fellowship by which he deigned to be also our brother called his soldiers kings, and warned beforehand that each must be fit, with the equipment of ten thousand, to fight with the king who has twenty thousand.

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:28–32: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Laetus, a novice monk troubled by his mother's demands. Allusions: Luke 14:28–32; Eph 6:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.1 (CSEL 57:568–569; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-1).

## Letter 243.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-2
- Source: CSEL 57:569–570
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine quotes Luke 14:26–33, where the parables of the tower and the king lead to the demand to renounce all one's own.

### Latin text

Sed paulo ante, quam de turre et de rege exhortatorias similitudines proponeret, adtende. quid dixerit: Si quis uenit ad me et non odit patrem suum et matrem et uxorem et filios et fratres et sorores adhuc et animam suam. non potest meus discipulus esse; et si non tulerit crucem suam et uenerit post me, non potest meus esse discipulus. deinde subiungit: Quis ex uobis nolens turrem aedificare non primo sedet et computat, si habet sumptum ad consummationem, ne quando, cum posuerit fundamentum, non possit aedificare et omnes, qui transeunt et uident, incipiant dicere: Hic homo coepit aedificare et non potuit perficere? aut quis rex uadens cum alio rege bellum committere non primum sedet et cogitat, si potens est cum decem milibus occurrere ei, qui cum uiginti milibus uenit ad illum? ceterum, dum adhuc longe est, mittit legationem rogans pacem. quo autem pertinerent istae similitudines, ipsa conclusione satis aperuit; ait enim: Sic ergo omnis ex uobis, qui non renuntiat omnibus, quae sunt eius, non potest meus esse discipulus.

### English translation (Claude)

But note what he said a little before he proposed the exhortatory comparisons of the tower and the king: “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother and wife and sons and brothers and sisters, yes, and his own soul too, he cannot be my disciple; and whoever does not carry his cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.” Then he adds: “Which of you, wishing to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it, lest, when he has laid the foundation and cannot build, all who pass by and see begin to say, ‘This man began to build and could not finish’? Or what king, going to wage war with another king, does not first sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? Otherwise, while the other is still far off, he sends an embassy asking for peace.” What these comparisons referred to he made clear enough by the conclusion itself; for he says: “So, then, any one of you who does not renounce all that is his cannot be my disciple.”

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:26–33: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Luke 14:26–33.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.2 (CSEL 57:569–570; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-2).

## Letter 243.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-3
- Source: CSEL 57:570–571
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that renouncing all one's own includes hating private family ties, since a mother as mother is temporal, but as a sister in Christ is shared eternally.

### Latin text

Itaque et sumptus ad turrem aedificandam et ualentia decem milium aduersus regem, qui uiginti habet, nihil est aliud, quam ut renuntiet unusquisque omnibus. quae sunt eius. praelocutio autem superior cum extrema conclusione concordat. in eo enim, quod quisque renuntiat omnibus, quae sunt eius, etiam illud continetur, ut oderit patrem suum et matrem et uxorem et filios et fratres et sorores adhuc et animam suam. omnia enim haec propria eius sunt, quae plerumque implicant et impediunt ad obtinenda non ista propria temporaliter transitura sed in aeternum mansura communia. quo enim tibi nunc quaedam mulier mater est, hoc ipso utique non est et mihi. quapropter hoc temporale ac transitorium est, sicut transisse iam uides, quod te concepit, quod gestauit utero, quod peperit, quod lacte nutriuit. quod autem soror in Christo est, et tibi est et mihi et omnibus, quibus una caelestis hereditas et pater deus et frater Christus in eadem caritatis societate promittitur. haec aeterna sunt: haec nulla temporis labe deteruntur: haec tanto firmius tenenda sperantur, quanto minus priuato sed communi potius iure obtinenda praedicantur.

### English translation (Claude)

So both the cost of building the tower and the strength of ten thousand against the king who has twenty are nothing other than that each should renounce all that is his. And the earlier preface agrees with the final conclusion. For in renouncing all that is one's own is included also hating one's father and mother and wife and sons and brothers and sisters, yes, and one's own soul too. For all these are one's own, and they often entangle and hinder one from obtaining not these private things that pass in time but common things that abide forever. For insofar as a certain woman is now your mother, by that very fact she is not mine too. Therefore this is temporal and passing, as you see that it has already passed that she conceived you, carried you in her womb, bore you, nursed you with milk. But insofar as she is a sister in Christ, she is so to you and to me and to all to whom one heavenly inheritance, God as Father and Christ as brother, is promised in the same fellowship of love. These things are eternal; these are worn away by no decay of time; these are hoped to be held the more firmly the less they are proclaimed as obtained by private right and the more by common right.

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:26: allusion, high confidence

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.3 (CSEL 57:570–571; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-3).

## Letter 243.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-4
- Source: CSEL 57:571–572
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Laetus that his mother hinders him only as his private mother, not as a sister in the Church, and that he must also hate private affection in his own soul.

### Latin text

Potes hoc facillime in ipsa tua matre cognoscere. nam unde te nunc inretitum inuoluit et ab instituto cursu retardatum reflectit et curuat. nisi ex quo tua propria mater est? nam ex quo soror est omnibus. quibus est pater deus et mater ecclesia, tam te non impedit quam neque me neque omnes fratres nostros, qui eam non priuata sicut tu in domo uestra sed publica in domo dei caritate diligimus. quod ergo tu illi etiam carnali necessitudine adnecteris, ad sortem ualere debet familiarius conloquendi et apertiore ianua consulendi. ipsum, quo te priuatim diligit, interficiatur in ea, ne. quod ex utero suo te genuit. pluris pendat, quam quod ex utero ecclesiae genita est tecum. quod autem de matre dixi, hoc et de tali cetera propinquitate intellegendum est. hoc etiam quisque de anima sua cogitet. ut etiam in ipsa priuatum affectum oderit, qui procul dubio temporalis est, diligat autem in ea communionem societatemque illam, qua dictum est: Erat illis in deum anima et cor unum. sic enim anima tua non est propria sed omnium fratrum, quorum etiam animae tuae sunt uel potius quorum animae cum tua non animae sed anima una est. Christi unica, quae de manu canis ut eruatur, cantat in psalmis. inde ad contemptum mortis facillime peruenitur.

### English translation (Claude)

You can recognize this very easily in your own mother. For from what source does she now entangle and involve you, and turn you back and bend you, held back from the course you had set, except from the fact that she is your own mother? For insofar as she is a sister to all who have God as Father and the Church as mother, she does not hinder you any more than me or all our brothers, who love her not with a private love in your house, as you do, but with a public love in the house of God. That you are bound to her also by a fleshly tie ought to count toward the privilege of speaking with her more familiarly and of advising her with a more open door. Let that very thing by which she loves you privately be slain in her, so that she may not value more highly that she bore you from her womb than that she was born with you from the womb of the Church. What I have said of a mother is to be understood of other such kinship as well. Let each one think this too of his own soul, so that in it also he may hate the private affection, which is without doubt temporal, but love in it that communion and fellowship of which it was said, “They had one soul and one heart toward God.” For thus your soul is not your own but that of all the brothers, whose souls are also yours, or rather whose souls together with yours are not souls but one soul, the only one of Christ, which sings in the psalms that it may be rescued from the hand of the dog. From there one comes very easily to contempt of death.

### Scripture references

- Acts 4:32: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 22:20 (21:21 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Acts 4:32; Ps 22:20 (LXX 21:21).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.4 (CSEL 57:571–572; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-4).

## Letter 243.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-5
- Source: CSEL 57:572–573
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that hating and losing one's parents, like hating one's own soul, means killing the fleshly affection that binds them to the world, not harming them.

### Latin text

Nec suscenseant parentes hoc praecipere dominum, ut eos oderimus, quando nobis hoc de anima nostra praecipitur. nam sicut nunc de anima iubetur, ut eam propter Christum cum parentibus oderimus, ita. quod alio loco de anima idem dominus dicit, in parentes quoque potest congruentissime conuenire: Qui amat, inquit. animam suam, perdet eam. dicam etiam fidenter: Qui amat parentes suos, perdet eos. de anima quippe ibi dixit oderit, quod hic perdet. sicut autem hoc praeceptum, quo perdere iubemur animam nostram, non ad id ualet. ut se quisque interimat, quod inexpiabile nefas est, et tamen ualet, ut interimat in se carnalem animae affectum, quo cum impedimento futurae uitae praesens uita delectat- hoc est enim, quod dictum est oderit animam suam et perdet eam. quod tamen diligendo fit, quando quidem apertissime fructum eiusdem animae adquirendae in eodem praecepto commemorat dicens: Qui perdiderit eam in isto saeculo. in uitam aeternam inueniet eam —, ita de parentibus rectissime dicitur, ut, qui eos amat. perdat eos non more parricidarum interficiens, sed spiritali gladio uerbi dei carnalem affectum eorum. quo et se ipsos et eos, quos genuerunt, implicamentis huius saeculi obligare conantur, pie fidenterque percutiens et occidens illud in eis uiuere faciat. quo fratres sunt, quo cum filiis suis temporalibus parentes aeternos deum ecclesiamque cognoscunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Let parents not be angry that the Lord commands this, that we hate them, since this is commanded us about our own soul. For as here it is commanded about the soul that we hate it for Christ's sake together with our parents, so what the same Lord says about the soul in another place can also apply most fittingly to parents: “Whoever loves his soul,” he says, “will lose it.” I will even say confidently: whoever loves his parents will lose them. For of the soul he said there “hate,” what here he says “lose.” But just as this command, by which we are told to lose our soul, does not mean that anyone should kill himself, which is an inexpiable crime, and yet does mean that he should kill in himself the fleshly affection of the soul by which the present life delights to the hindrance of the future life (for this is what is said, “he shall hate his soul and lose it”; yet this is done by loving, since in the same command he plainly mentions the fruit of gaining that same soul, saying, “Whoever loses it in this world will find it unto eternal life”), so it is said most rightly of parents that whoever loves them should lose them, not killing them in the manner of parricides, but striking piously and confidently with the spiritual sword of the word of God their fleshly affection, by which they try to bind both themselves and those they have begotten in the entanglements of this world, and slaying it, so that he makes that live in them by which they are brothers, by which together with their temporal children they acknowledge their eternal parents, God and the Church.

### Scripture references

- John 12:25: quotation, high confidence
- Luke 14:26: allusion, high confidence
- Eph 6:17: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 12:25 (with Luke 14:26). Augustine calls suicide an inexpiable crime.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.5 (CSEL 57:572–573; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-5).

## Letter 243.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-6
- Source: CSEL 57:573–574
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine contrasts Laetus's mother, who holds him back from God's service, with the mother of the Maccabees and the Spartan mothers.

### Latin text

Ecce rapit te studium ueritatis et cognoscendae atque percipiendae uoluntatis dei in scripturis sanctis. rapit euangelicae praedicationis officium. dat signum dominus, ut uigilemus in castris. ut aedificemus turrem. de qua hostem sempiternae uitae et prospicere et propellere ualeamus. rapit militem Christi tuba caelestis ad proelium et retinet mater non plane talis, qualis Machabaeorum fuit, nec saltem similis Lacedaemoniis matribus, de quibus memoriae proditum est, quod filios suos, ut pro terrena patria sanguinem funderent, multo amplius atque ardentius in certamina bellica quam signorum sonitus excitabant. nam mater, quae te ad discendam uitam remoueri a curis saecularibus non permittit, satis ostendit, quem ad modum te, si opus esset. ad subeundam mortem penitus saeculum repudiare permitteret.

### English translation (Claude)

See, zeal for truth and for knowing and grasping the will of God in the holy Scriptures carries you off; the duty of preaching the gospel carries you off. The Lord gives the signal to keep watch in the camp, to build the tower from which we can see and drive back the enemy of eternal life. The heavenly trumpet carries off the soldier of Christ to battle, and his mother holds him back: a mother certainly not like the mother of the Maccabees, nor even like the Spartan mothers, of whom it is recorded that they roused their sons, to shed their blood for an earthly fatherland, into the battles of war far more and more ardently than the sound of the trumpets. For a mother who does not allow you to be withdrawn from worldly cares in order to learn how to live shows clearly enough how she would allow you, if need be, to renounce the world entirely in order to undergo death.

### Extrabiblical texts

- 2 Macc 7 (2 Maccabees): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The mother of the seven brothers: 2 Macc 7. Spartan mothers: a commonplace of classical moral literature.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.6 (CSEL 57:573–574; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-6).

## Letter 243.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-7
- Source: CSEL 57:574
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Laetus to kill the fleshly affection his mother appeals to, while still showing her filial gratitude where higher duties do not call.

### Latin text

Sed quid dicit aut quid allegat? forte decem illos menses, quibus uiscera eius onerasti, et dolores parturitionis ac labores educationis? hoc, hoc interfice uerbo salutari; hoc perde matris; ut in uitam aeternam inuenias eam: hoc memento ut oderis in ea, si diligis eam, si tiro Christi es, si turris fundamenta posuisti, ne dicant transeuntes: Hic homo coepit aedificare et non potuit perficere. carnalis enim affectus est iste et adhuc ueterem hominem sonat. hunc carnalem affectum et in nobis et in nostris militia Christiana ut perimamus hortatur nec tamen ita, ut ingratus sit quisque parentibus et eadem ipsa beneficia, quibus in hanc uitam editus, susceptus atque nutritus est, enumerata derideat. seruet potius ubique pietatem; habeant haec locum, ubi maiora non uocant.

### English translation (Claude)

But what does she say, or what does she plead? Perhaps those ten months in which you burdened her womb, and the pains of childbirth and the labors of rearing? This, this kill with the saving word; this lose in your mother, so that you may find her in eternal life; this remember to hate in her, if you love her, if you are a recruit of Christ, if you have laid the foundations of the tower, so that passers-by may not say, “This man began to build and could not finish.” For this is a fleshly affection and still sounds of the old man. This fleshly affection, both in ourselves and in our own, the Christian soldiery urges us to destroy; yet not so that anyone should be ungrateful to his parents and mock the very benefits by which he was brought into this life, received and nourished, when they are listed. Let him rather keep filial duty everywhere; let these things have their place where greater things do not call.

### Scripture references

- Luke 14:30: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 4:22: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Luke 14:30. Allusion: Eph 4:22 (the old man). The phrase hoc perde matris is defective in the digital text; translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.7 (CSEL 57:574; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-7).

## Letter 243.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-8
- Source: CSEL 57:574–575
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine reminds Laetus that the Church is mother to him and his mother alike, and needs his help against heresy and lukewarmness, as Christ endured all for him.

### Latin text

Mater ecclesia mater est etiam matris tuae. haec uos de Christo concepit, haec martyrum sanguine parturiuit, haec in sempiternam lucem peperit, haec fidei lacte nutriuit et nutrit cibosque maiores praeparans, quod adhuc paruuli et sine dentibus uagire uultis, horrescit. haec mater toto orbe diffusa tam uariis et multiplicibus errorum infestationibus agitatur, ut abortiui etiam filii eius aduersus eam infrenis armis belligerare non dubitent. ignauia etiam atque torpore quorundam. quos gremio continet, et membra sua frigescere plurimis locis et fouendis paruulis minus idonea fieri dolet. unde nisi per alios filios, unde nisi per alia membra, quorum e numero es, iustum ac debitum poscit auxilium? huiusne tu necessitates deserens ad carnalia uerba conuerteris? nonne haec grauioribus querelis insonat auribus? nonne cariora uiscera et caelestia ubera ostentat? adde uiri eius susceptionem carnis, ne carnalibus inhaereres. et a uerbo aeterno uniuersa, quae tibi mater inproperat, ne his implicareris, adsumpta: adde contumelias, flagella, mortem, mortem autem crucis.

### English translation (Claude)

Mother Church is the mother of your mother too. She conceived you both of Christ; she brought you forth in labor through the blood of the martyrs; she bore you into everlasting light; she nursed and nurses you with the milk of faith, and, preparing stronger food, she shudders that you still wish to cry like toothless infants. This mother, spread through the whole world, is shaken by such varied and manifold attacks of errors that even her miscarried sons do not hesitate to wage war against her with unbridled arms. She grieves too that through the laziness and torpor of some whom she holds in her lap, her members grow cold in many places and become less fit to cherish the little ones. From whom, if not through other sons, from whom, if not through other members, of whose number you are, does she ask just and due help? Will you desert her needs and turn to fleshly words? Does she not sound in your ears with weightier complaints? Does she not show you dearer womb and heavenly breasts? Add her Husband's taking of flesh, so that you might not cling to fleshly things, and his taking up by the eternal Word all that your mother reproaches you with, so that you might not be entangled in them; add insults, scourges, death, and death on a cross.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:2: allusion, medium confidence
- Phil 2:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 3:1–2; Heb 5:12; Phil 2:8. “Miscarried sons”: heretics and schismatics.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.8 (CSEL 57:574–575; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-8).

## Letter 243.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-9
- Source: CSEL 57:575–577
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Christ's answer “Who is my mother?” as an example of putting heavenly kinship above earthly ties, while noting that Mary also did the Father's will.

### Latin text

Talibus concepte seminibus talique in uitam nouam conubio procreate, languescis et contabescis in ueterem hominem! itane matrem terrenam non habebat imperator tuus? quae tamen cum ei nuntiaretur agenti caelestia. respondit: Quae mihi mater aut qui mihi fratres? et extendens manum in discipulos suos. non dixit pertinere ad cognationem suam. nisi qui faceret uoluntatem patris eius. in quo numero profecto etiam ipsam Mariam benignus, inclusit: faciebat enim et illa uoluntatem patris. ita optimus magister atque diuinus et maternum nomen. quod ei quasi priuatum propriumque nuntiauerant, quia terrenum erat, in comparatione caelestis propinquitatis abiecit et eandem caelestem propinquitatem in discipulis suis commemorans, quo sibi rursum consortio generis cum ceteris sanctis uirgo illa cohaereret, ostendit. et ne isto saluberrimo magisterio, quo contemni carnalem affectum in parentibus docuit. adminiculum error acciperet. quo matrem habuisse a quibusdam negatur, alio loco discipulos monuit, ne se patrem in terris dicant habere, ut. quo modo illos habuisse manifestum est patres, sic se habuisse matrem manifestaret, cuius tamen terrena cognatione contempta contemnendarum talium necessitudinum discipulis praeberet exemplum.

### English translation (Claude)

Conceived from such seeds and begotten to new life by such a marriage, do you languish and waste away into the old man! Did your Commander not have an earthly mother? Yet when she was announced to him while he was doing heavenly things, he answered: “Who is my mother, or who are my brothers?” And stretching out his hand to his disciples, he said that none belonged to his kindred except him who did the will of his Father; in which number he kindly included Mary herself, for she too did the will of the Father. So the best and divine Teacher set aside the name of mother, which they had announced to him as if private and his own, because it was earthly, in comparison with heavenly kinship; and, mentioning that same heavenly kinship in his disciples, he showed by what fellowship of kind that virgin was joined to him again with the other saints. And lest the error by which some deny that he had a mother should take support from this most wholesome teaching, by which he taught that fleshly affection toward parents is to be despised, in another place he warned his disciples not to say that they had a father on earth, so that, as it is clear they had fathers, so he might make clear that he had a mother, whose earthly kinship he nevertheless despised to give his disciples an example of despising such ties.

### Scripture references

- Matt 12:48–50: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:9: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Matt 12:48–50; Matt 23:9. “Those who deny that he had a mother”: the Manichees.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.9 (CSEL 57:575–577; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-9).

## Letter 243.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-10
- Source: CSEL 57:577–578
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Laetus to repay his mother with spiritual benefits but not let her draw him back, comparing her appeals to Eve and the serpent's cunning.

### Latin text

Haec ergo interrumpuntur uocibus matris tuae et inter haec locum inuenit commemoratio praegnantis atque lactantis, ut de Adam et Eua alius Adam nascereris et nutrireris? respice potius, respice Adam secundum de caelo et porta iam caelestis imaginem, sicut terreni portasti. immo et hic habeant locum materna terrena ipsa beneficia, quae tibi ad eneruationem cordis enumerantur, habeant prorsus locum; noli esse ingratus, repende gratiam matri tuae, repende spiritalia pro carnalibus, pro temporalibus sempiterna. sed non uult sequi? non impediat. non uult conuerti in melius? caue, ne in deterius peruertat et euertat. quid interest, utrum in uxore an in matre, dum tamen Eua in qualibet muliere caueatur? nam ista umbra pietatis de foliis illius arboris uenit. quibus se primum parentes nostri in illa damnabili nuditate texerunt. et quicquid in illis uerbis atque suggestione quasi officium tibi caritatis obtendit. ut te a germanissima et sincerissima euangelii caritate detorqueat, ad astutiam serpentis pertinet et ad duplicitatem regis illius, qui habet uiginti milia. quam nos docemur decem milium, hoc est cordis, in qua deum quaerimus, simplicitate superare.

### English translation (Claude)

Are these things, then, to be interrupted by your mother's voice, and among them does mention of her pregnancy and nursing find a place, so that you were born and nourished as another Adam from Adam and Eve? Look rather, look to the second Adam from heaven, and now bear the image of the heavenly, as you have borne that of the earthly. Even so, let your mother's earthly benefits themselves, which are listed to unnerve your heart, have their place here too; let them indeed have their place. Do not be ungrateful; repay your mother's kindness; repay spiritual things for fleshly, eternal for temporal. But she will not follow? Let her not hinder. She will not be converted to better things? Take care that she does not pervert and overturn you to worse. What difference does it make whether in a wife or in a mother, as long as Eve is guarded against in any woman? For that shadow of filial duty comes from the leaves of that tree with which our first parents first covered themselves in that damnable nakedness. And whatever she holds out to you in those words and suggestions as a duty of love, to twist you away from the most genuine and sincere love of the gospel, belongs to the cunning of the serpent and to the duplicity of that king who has twenty thousand, which we are taught to overcome by the simplicity of ten thousand, that is, of the heart in which we seek God.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 15:47–49: allusion, high confidence
- Gen 3:7: allusion, high confidence
- Luke 14:31: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:47–49; Gen 3:7; Luke 14:31; Wis 1:1 (simplicity of heart).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.10 (CSEL 57:577–578; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-10).

## Letter 243.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-11
- Source: CSEL 57:578
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Laetus to take up his cross, the mortality of the flesh, and crucify it so as to follow Christ.

### Latin text

His potius intende, carissime, et tolle crucem tuam et sequere dominum. nam cum te praesentem animaduerterem domesticis curis a diuino studio retardari, ferri te potius et duci a cruce tua quam eam te ferre ac ducere sentiebam. crucem enim nostram dominus. quam portari a nobis iubet. ut eum expeditissimi sequamur, quid aliud quam mortalitatem carnis huius significat? ipsa enim nos cruciat, donec absorbeatur mors in uictoriam. crux ergo haec ipsa crucifigenda est et transfigenda clauis timoris dei, ne solutis et liberis membris reluctantem portare non possimus. sequi enim dominum nisi eam portans omnino non uales; nam quo modo eum sequeris, si non es eius? qui autem Iesu Christi sunt, ait apostolus, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum passionibus et desideriis.

### English translation (Claude)

Attend rather to these things, dearest, and take up your cross and follow the Lord. For when you were with me and I noticed that you were held back from divine study by household cares, I felt that you were rather being carried and led by your cross than carrying and leading it. For what does our cross, which the Lord commands us to carry so that we may follow him unencumbered, signify but the mortality of this flesh? For it torments us until death is swallowed up in victory. This very cross, then, must be crucified and pierced with the nails of the fear of God, lest, its members loose and free, we be unable to carry it as it resists. For you cannot follow the Lord at all unless you carry it; for how will you follow him if you are not his? “But those who belong to Jesus Christ,” says the apostle, “have crucified their flesh with its passions and desires.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 16:24: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:54: allusion, high confidence
- Ps 119:120 (118:120 LXX): allusion, medium confidence
- Gal 5:24: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 16:24; 1 Cor 15:54; Ps 119:120 (LXX 118:120, “pierce my flesh with your fear”). Quotation: Gal 5:24.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.11 (CSEL 57:578; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-11).

## Letter 243.12

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-12
- Source: CSEL 57:578–580
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Laetus to give his family estate to his mother and household, then not let family troubles hold him back, for ordered love puts greater things first.

### Latin text

Si quid sane pecuniae res tua familiaris habet, cuius te implicari negotio nec oportet nec decet, re uera tribuendum est matri et domesticis tuis. horum quippe indigentia, si pauperibus, ut sis perfectus, instituisti distribuere talia tua. primum apud te locum obtinere debent; si quis enim suis et maxime domesticis, ait apostolus, non prouidet, fidem negauit et est infideli deterior. quibus ordinandis rebus si. ut collum exueres induendum sapientiae uinculis, profectus a nobis es, quid tibi nocent aut quo pacto te peruellunt matris lacrimae fluentes carnem aut serui fuga aut mors ancillarum aut fratrum morbosa ualitudo, si est in te caritas ordinata sciens praeponere maiora minoribus et misericordia moueri. ut pauperes euangelizentur, ut ne messis domini copiosa operariorum inopia in praedam uolucribus iaceat, et paratum habere cor ad sequendam domini uoluntatem in eo, quod uel flagellando uel parcendo agere statuerit cum seruis suis? haec meditare, in his esto, ut prouectus tuus manifestus sit in omnibus. obsecro te, ut caueas. ne maiorem tristitiam des bonis fratribus torpore tuo, quam laetitiam alacritate iam dederas; commendare autem litteris. quibus uoluisti, tam superfluum putaui, quam si quisquam te mihi eodem modo commendare uoluisset.

### English translation (Claude)

If your family estate has any money, with whose business you ought not and it is not fitting to be entangled, it should indeed be given to your mother and your household. For if you have resolved to distribute such things of yours to the poor so as to be perfect, their need should have first place with you; for “if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for his household,” says the apostle, “he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” If you left us to arrange these matters, so that you might free your neck to put on the bonds of wisdom, what harm do your mother's tears, flowing for the flesh, or a slave's flight, or the death of maidservants, or your brothers' sickly health do you, or how do they tear at you, if there is in you ordered love that knows how to put greater things before lesser and to be moved by mercy so that the poor may have the gospel preached, so that the Lord's abundant harvest may not lie as prey to the birds for want of workers, and to have a heart ready to follow the Lord's will in whatever he decides to do with his servants, whether by scourging or by sparing? Meditate on these things, be in them, so that your progress may be evident in all things. I beg you, take care not to give the good brothers greater sadness by your torpor than the joy you had already given them by your eagerness. As for commending you by letter to those you wished, I thought it as superfluous as if someone had wished to commend you to me in the same way.

### Scripture references

- Matt 19:21: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 9:37: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 4:15: quotation, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 6:24 (Sirach): allusion, low confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Matt 19:21; 1 Tim 5:8; Sir 6:24–25 (neck in the bonds of wisdom); Song 2:4 Old Latin (“ordered love”); Matt 11:5; Matt 9:37; 1 Tim 4:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 243.12 (CSEL 57:578–580; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-243-12).

## Letter 244.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-244-1
- Source: CSEL 57:580
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to Chrisimus, who in grief over losses was rumored to have contemplated suicide, to remind him that earthly goods cannot compare with heavenly ones.

### Latin text

Rumor ad me detulit — deus faciat, ut non sit! — sic te animo perturbatum, ut multum mirer prudentiam tuam et Christianum animum parum cogitare terrenarum rerum condicionem nullo modo aequare posse caelestibus, ubi cor nostrum et spes nostra conlocanda est. uir cordate, numquid aut totum bonum tuum in his rebus erat, quas nunc uideris amittere, aut tam magnum bonum illic deputabas, ut eo subtracto sic tenebrescat mens nimia tristitia, quasi lumen eius non deus sed terra sit? audiui enim — iam dixi: deus faciat. ut falsum audierim! —, quod tibi etiam manus uelles inferre. quod melius non credo aut ascendisse in cor tuum aut exisse de ore tuo. sed tamen, quia ita perturbatus es. ut hoc de te dici potuerit, grauiter de te contristatus hoc litterarum alloquio putaui consolandam caritatem tuam, quamquam non dubitem dominum deum nostrum in corde tuo loqui meliora; noui enim, quam pio studio semper audieris uerbum eius.

### English translation (Claude)

Rumor has brought me word (may God grant it is not so!) that you are so disturbed in mind that I greatly wonder that your prudence and Christian mind give so little thought to the fact that the condition of earthly things can in no way equal heavenly ones, where our heart and our hope must be placed. Man of sense, was your whole good in these things which you now seem to be losing, or did you count them so great a good that, when it is taken away, your mind grows dark with excessive sadness, as if its light were not God but the earth? For I have heard (I have said it already: God grant I heard falsely!) that you even wished to lay hands on yourself. I do not believe that it entered your heart or came out of your mouth. But still, since you are so disturbed that this could be said of you, I am deeply saddened about you and have thought to console Your Charity with this address by letter, although I do not doubt that the Lord our God speaks better things in your heart; for I know with what devout zeal you have always heard his word.

### Scripture references

- Col 3:2: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Chrisimus, a layman. Allusion: Col 3:1–2.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 244.1 (CSEL 57:580; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-244-1).

## Letter 244.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-244-2
- Source: CSEL 57:580–581
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Chrisimus to take courage, since God uses losses to free us from love of fragile things, and mentions a letter to the count.

### Latin text

Erige itaque animum, frater in Christo carissime; deus noster nec perit a suis nec perdet suos. uult autem monere nos, quam sint haec fragilia et incerta. quae nimis diligunt homines, ut soluant ab eis uinculum cupiditatis, per quod implicatos nos trahunt, et totum amorem nostrum consuefaciamus in eum currere, in quo nulla damna timeamus. ipse te hortatur per ministerium nostrum, uiriliter cogites te fidelem esse Christianum et eius redemptum esse sanguine, qui non solum aeterna sapientia sed etiam humana praesentia docuit nos temperanter prospera saeculi huius contemnere et fortiter aduersa tolerare eius felicitatis mercedem pollicens, quam nemo nobis possit auferre. scripsi sane etiam ad uirum laudabilem comitem, quam epistulam in tuo erit arbitrio utrum dari uelis; nam per quem detur, non dubito deesse non posse adiuuante domino uel episcopum uel presbyterum uel quemlibet

### English translation (Claude)

Lift up your mind, then, dearest brother in Christ; our God is neither lost to his own nor will he lose his own. But he wishes to warn us how fragile and uncertain are these things that men love too much, so as to loosen from them the chain of desire by which they drag us along entangled, and so that we may accustom all our love to run to him in whom we fear no loss. He himself exhorts you through our ministry to consider manfully that you are a faithful Christian, redeemed by the blood of him who, not only by his eternal wisdom but also by his human presence, taught us to despise with moderation the prosperity of this world and to bear its adversity with courage, promising the reward of that happiness which no one can take from us. I have also written to the praiseworthy count; it will be at your discretion whether you want that letter delivered. For I do not doubt that, with the Lord's help, there cannot be lacking someone to deliver it, whether a bishop or a presbyter or anyone…

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 1:19: allusion, medium confidence
- John 16:22: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- The letter breaks off in the digital text (and in the edition) mid-sentence. Allusions: 1 Pet 1:18–19; John 16:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 244.2 (CSEL 57:580–581; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-244-2).

## Letter 245.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-245-1
- Source: CSEL 57:581–582
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine advises Bishop Possidius not to forbid married women all ornaments, but to forbid uncovered hair and cosmetics, since true adornment is good character.

### Latin text

Magis, quid agas cum eis, qui obtemperare nolunt, cogitandum est, quam quem ad modum eis ostendas non licere, quod faciunt. sed nunc epistula sanctitatis tuae et occupatissimum me repperit et celerrimus baiuli reditus neque non rescribere tibi neque ad ea, quae consuluisti, ita, ut oportet, respondere permisit. nolo tamen de ornamentis auri uel uestis praeproperam habeas in prohibendo sententiam nisi eos, qui neque coniugati neque coniugari cupientes cogitare debent. quo modo placeant deo. illi autem cogitant, quae sunt mundi, quo modo placeant uel uiri uxoribus uel mulieres maritis, nisi quod capillos nudare feminas, quas etiam caput uelare apostolus iubet, nec maritatas decet; fucari autem pigmentis, quo uel rubicundior uel candidior appareat, adulterina fallacia est, qua non dubito etiam ipsos maritos se nolle decipi, quibus solis permittendae sunt feminae ornari secundum ueniam non secundum imperium. nam uerus ornatus maxime Christianorum et Christianarum non tantum nullus fucus mendax uerum ne auri quidem uestisque pompa sed mores boni sunt.

### English translation (Claude)

You should think more about what to do with those who will not obey than about how to show them that what they do is not permitted. But just now Your Holiness's letter found me very busy, and the very quick return of the bearer allowed me neither not to reply to you nor to answer your questions as I should. Still, I do not want you to be too hasty in forbidding ornaments of gold or dress, except for those who, neither married nor wishing to marry, ought to think how they may please God. But the others think of the things of the world, how husbands may please their wives or wives their husbands; except that it is not fitting even for married women to uncover their hair, since the apostle commands women to veil their heads. But to paint oneself with cosmetics so as to appear more rosy or more fair is an adulterous deceit, by which I do not doubt even husbands themselves do not wish to be deceived, and only for them may women be permitted to adorn themselves, by way of concession, not of command. For the true adornment, especially of Christian men and women, is not only no lying paint, but not even a display of gold and dress, but good character.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:32–34: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:6: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Tim 2:9–10: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 3:3–4: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Possidius, bishop of Calama. Allusions: 1 Cor 7:32–34; 1 Cor 11:5–6; 1 Tim 2:9–10; 1 Pet 3:3–4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 245.1 (CSEL 57:581–582; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-245-1).

## Letter 245.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-245-2
- Source: CSEL 57:582–583
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine condemns amulets and superstitious earrings as service of demons, and declines to advise ordaining a man baptized among the Donatists.

### Latin text

Execranda autem superstitio ligaturarum, in quibus etiam inaures uirorum in summis ex una parte auriculis suspensae deputantur: non ad placendum hominibus sed ad seruiendum daemonibus adhibentur. quis autem possit speciales nefariarum superstitionum prohibitiones in scripturis inuenire, cum generaliter apostolus dicat: Nolo uos socios fieri daemoniorum et iterum: Quae enim consonantia Christi ad Belial? nisi forte, quia Belial nominauit et generalem societatem daemoniorum prohibuit, licet Christianis sacrificare Neptuno, quia nihil proprie de Neptuno uetitum legimus. moneantur interim miseri, ut, si obtemperare nolunt praeceptis salubrioribus. saltem sacrilegia sua non defendant, ne maiore se scelere implicent. quid autem cura eis agendum sit. si soluere inaures timent et corpus Christi cum signo diaboli accipere non timent? De ordinando autem, qui in parte Donati baptizatus est, auctor tibi esse non possum: aliud est enim facere. si cogaris, aliud consulere, ut facias.

### English translation (Claude)

But the superstition of amulets is to be abhorred, among which are counted even men's earrings hung from the top of the ear on one side; they are used not to please men but to serve demons. Who could find specific prohibitions of wicked superstitions in the Scriptures, when the apostle says in general, “I do not want you to become partners of demons,” and again, “What harmony has Christ with Belial?” Unless perhaps, because he named Belial and forbade fellowship with demons in general, Christians may sacrifice to Neptune, since we read no prohibition specifically about Neptune! Meanwhile let the wretched people be warned that, if they will not obey more wholesome precepts, they at least should not defend their sacrileges, so as not to entangle themselves in a greater crime. But what is to be done with them, if they are afraid to take off their earrings and are not afraid to receive the body of Christ with the sign of the devil? As for ordaining one who was baptized in the party of Donatus, I cannot advise you to do it; for it is one thing to do it if you are compelled, another to advise that you do it.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 10:20: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 6:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 10:20; 2 Cor 6:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 245.2 (CSEL 57:582–583; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-245-2).

## Letter 246.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-1
- Source: CSEL 57:583–584
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine promises Lampadius a fuller reply on fate and fortune, warning that the doctrine of fate leads people to defend their sins.

### Latin text

De quaestione fati ac fortunae, qua tuum animum non leuiter moueri et, cum praesens essem, aduerti et nunc tuis litteris gratius certiusque cognoui, rescriptum tibi non parui uoluminis debeo, quod dominus praestabit ut ita explicem, quem ad modum nouit tibi congruere ac saluti fidei tuae. non enim paruum malum est peruersis opinionibus non solum ad committendum blandimento uoluptatis adduci sed etiam ad defendendum peccatum a medicamento confessionis auerti.

### English translation (Claude)

On the question of fate and fortune, by which I noticed when I was with you that your mind is not lightly moved, and now have learned more pleasantly and more certainly from your letter, I owe you a reply of no small volume, which the Lord will grant me to set out as he knows suits you and the health of your faith. For it is no small evil to be led by perverse opinions not only to commit sin by the allurement of pleasure but also to be turned from the remedy of confession to defending it.

### Translation notes

- To Lampadius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 246.1 (CSEL 57:583–584; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-1).

## Letter 246.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-2
- Source: CSEL 57:584
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that all law and discipline presuppose that the will causes sin, and that astrologers themselves punish their wives rather than blame the stars.

### Latin text

Illud sane quanto citius ac breuiter noueris, omnes leges atque instituta omnia disciplinae, laudes, uituperationes, exhortationes, terrores, praemia. supplicia ceteraque omnia, quibus humanum genus administratur et regitur, penitus labefactari atque subuerti nihilque in eis omnino iustitiae remanere. nisi uoluntas sit causa peccandi. quanto ergo licentius et aequius mathematicorum inprobamus errores, quam diuinas leges uel etiam domorum nostrarum curam damnare atque abicere cogimur, quod nec ipsi mathematici faciunt! nam cum aliquis eorum hominibus nummatis fatua fata uendiderit. mox, ut oculum a tabellis eburneis ad domus suae moderamen ac sollicitudinem reuocauerit, non solum uocibus sed etiam plagis emendat uxorem, non dico si petulantius iocantem sed si inmoderatius per fenestram aspicientem animaduerterit. quae tamen si ei dicat: Quid me caedis? Venerem caede, si potes, a qua cogor hoc facere, tunc uero ille non curat, quam uana uerba componat fallendis extraneis, sed quam iusta uerbera inponat corrigendis suis.

### English translation (Claude)

Know this, however, the sooner and more briefly the better: all laws and all institutions of discipline, praise, blame, exhortation, threats, rewards, punishments, and all the other things by which the human race is administered and governed, are utterly shaken and overturned, and no justice at all remains in them, unless the will is the cause of sinning. How much more freely and justly, then, do we reject the errors of the astrologers than we would be forced to condemn and cast away the divine laws, or even the care of our own households, which not even the astrologers themselves do! For when one of them has sold foolish fates to moneyed men, as soon as he turns his eye from his ivory tablets to the management and care of his own house, he corrects his wife not only with words but with blows, I do not say if he finds her jesting too wantonly but if he notices her looking out of the window too much. Yet if she says to him, “Why do you beat me? Beat Venus, if you can, by whom I am forced to do this,” then indeed he does not care what empty words he puts together to deceive strangers, but what just blows he lays on to correct his own.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 246.2 (CSEL 57:584; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-2).

## Letter 246.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-3
- Source: CSEL 57:584–585
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that anyone who blames fate refutes himself by punishing and rewarding others, and promises a fuller book if Lampadius wishes.

### Latin text

Quando ergo quisque, cum reprehendi coeperit, causam conuertit in fatum et ideo se culpari non uult. quia fato se dicit coactum fecisse id. quod arguitur, redeat ad se ipsum. seruet hoc in suis, non castiget seruum furem, non de contumelioso filio conqueratur, uicino inprobo non minetur. quid enim horum faciens iuste facit, si omnes, a quibus iniurias patitur, non culpa sua sed fato inpelluntur, ut faciant? si autem iure proprio et patris familias diligentia. quoscumque homines pro tempore in potestate habet, hortatur ad bonum, deterret a malo, imperat, suae uoluntati ut obtemperent, honorat eos, qui sibi ad nutum oboediunt. uindicat in eos, qui se contemnunt, rependit gratiam beneficis, odit ingratos, egone expectabo, ut contra fatum disputet, cum tanta eum non uerbis sed factis eloqui deprehendam, ut prope manibus suis omnes mathematicorum lapillos supra capita eorum frangere uideatur? his itaque paucis si auiditas tua contenta non est et librum aliquem de hac re, quem diutius legas, desideras. patienter tibi sunt expectandae uacationes nostrae et rogandus deus, qui et otium et facultatem satiando de hac re animo tuo tribuere dignetur. ero tamen alacrior, si et saepe commemorare me litteris tuam non piguerit caritatem et, quid de hac epistula sentias, rescribendo edocueris.

### English translation (Claude)

When, therefore, anyone, on beginning to be reproved, turns the cause onto fate and does not want to be blamed because he says he was forced by fate to do what he is accused of, let him come back to himself and keep this rule with his own: let him not punish a thieving slave, not complain of an insolent son, not threaten a wicked neighbor. For what does he do justly in doing any of these, if all from whom he suffers wrongs are driven to do it not by their own fault but by fate? But if by his own right and the diligence of a head of household he exhorts to good whatever persons he has under his power for the time being, deters them from evil, commands them to obey his will, honors those who obey him at a nod, punishes those who despise him, repays kindness to benefactors, hates the ungrateful, shall I wait for him to argue against fate, when I find him saying so much, not in words but in deeds, that he seems almost to break with his own hands all the astrologers' pebbles over their heads? If your eagerness is not content with these few words and you want some book on this matter to read at greater length, you must wait patiently for our leisure and ask God to deign to grant both the leisure and the ability to satisfy your mind on this matter. I will be the more eager, however, if Your Charity does not mind reminding me often by letter, and lets me know by writing back what you think of this letter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 246.3 (CSEL 57:584–585; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-246-3).

## Letter 247.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-1
- Source: CSEL 57:585–586
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes the landowner Romulus for demanding a second payment from poor tenants who had already paid his agent.

### Latin text

Veritas et dulcis est et amara. quando dulcis est, parcet, quando amara, curat. si non recusas bibere, quod in hac epistula offero, probabis, quod dixi. utinam, sicut mihi non obest, sic nec tibi obesset, quicquid contumeliarum mihi inrogas, et utinam uel tantum tibi obesset iniquitas, quam miseris et pauperibus facis, quantum obest ipsis, quibus eam facis! illi enim ad tempus laborant, tu autem uide. quid tibi thesaurizes in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii dei, qui reddet unicuique secundum opera sua. cuius misericordiam deprecor. ut hic te corrigat, quo modo ipse nouit, potius, quam reseruet in illum diem, quando iam nullus erit correctionis locus, ut, qui tibi dedit timorem suum, propter quem de te non despero, aperiat tibi sensum et uideas, quae facis, et exhorreas et emendes. parua enim et quasi nulla tibi uidentur, quae tam magna mala sunt, ut, quando te domita cupiditas ea considerare permiserit, riges lacrimis terram, ut deus misereatur tui. aut si ego iniquus sum, qui hoc tecum ago, ne miseri et egeni homines bis reddant, quod debent, cum coloni actori suo dederint subdito praeposito et iubenti seruientes nec ille se accepisse negare potuerit, si ergo ego iniquus sum, quia mihi uidetur iniustum, ut bis exigantur, qui semel reddere uix sufficiunt, fac. quod uis: si autem tu uides. quia iniustum est. fac, quod decet. faciat, quod deus iubet et ego rogo.

### English translation (Claude)

Truth is both sweet and bitter. When it is sweet, it spares; when it is bitter, it heals. If you do not refuse to drink what I offer in this letter, you will prove what I have said. Would that, as the insults you heap on me do me no harm, so they did you no harm; and would that the injustice you do to the wretched and poor harmed you only as much as it harms those to whom you do it! For they suffer for a time, but you see what you are storing up for yourself in the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who will repay each according to his works. I pray his mercy to correct you here, as he knows how, rather than reserve you for that day when there will be no more room for correction; that he who gave you his fear, because of which I do not despair of you, may open your understanding, and you may see what you are doing, shudder at it and amend it. For the things that seem small and almost nothing to you are such great evils that, when your desire is tamed and lets you consider them, you will water the ground with tears so that God may have mercy on you. Or if I am unjust in pressing you about this, that poor and needy men should not pay twice what they owe, since the tenants gave to your agent, serving the overseer placed over them as he commanded, and he could not deny having received it; if, then, I am unjust because it seems unjust to me that those who can barely pay once should be made to pay twice, do what you wish. But if you see that it is unjust, do what is fitting. Let him do what God commands and I ask.

### Scripture references

- Rom 2:5–6: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Romulus, a landowner. Allusion: Rom 2:5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 247.1 (CSEL 57:585–586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-1).

## Letter 247.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-2
- Source: CSEL 57:586–587
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Romulus to have mercy on his own soul, and reproaches him for leaving after Sunday worship without seeing him.

### Latin text

Non pro illis magis — nouit ille, quem timeo — sed pro te ipso te ipsum rogo, ut, quo modo scriptum est. miserearis animae tuae placens deo. et modo quidem non rogandus sed obiurgandus es; nam et hoc scriptum est: Ego quem amo. redarguo et castigo. ego tamen, si pro me rogandus esses, forte non te rogarem; quia uero pro te rogandus es, rogo te iratum. ut parcas tibi, ut placeris tibi, ut tibi placetur ille, quem rogas. misi ad te die sabbati, cum adhuc pranderes. ut non proficiscereris. nisi me uidisses. renuntiasti ita te esse facturum. surrexisti die dominico et, ut audiui, uenisti in ecclesiam et orasti et profectus es et me uidere noluisti. deus tibi ignoscat. quid enim aliud tibi dicam, nisi, quod ipse nouit, quia cupio? sed scio, quia, nisi te correxeris, ille iustus est. cum autem tibi parcis, et mihi parcis; neque enim tam miser sum et alienus a uisceribus Christi, ut non grauissimo uulnere feriatur cor meum. quando sic agunt, quos in eius euangelio genui.

### English translation (Claude)

Not for them more (he whom I fear knows it) but for your own sake I ask you yourself, as it is written, to have mercy on your soul by pleasing God. And now indeed you should not be asked but rebuked; for this too is written: “Those whom I love I rebuke and chasten.” Yet if you had to be asked on my behalf, perhaps I would not ask you; but since you must be asked on your own behalf, I ask you, angry as you are, to spare yourself, to be reconciled to yourself, to have him whom you ask reconciled to you. I sent to you on the Sabbath, while you were still at lunch, asking you not to leave without seeing me. You sent back word that you would do so. You rose on the Lord's day, and, as I have heard, came to church and prayed and left, and would not see me. May God forgive you. What else shall I say to you except what he knows I desire? But I know that, unless you correct yourself, he is just. When you spare yourself, you spare me too; for I am not so wretched and so estranged from the heart of Christ that my heart is not struck with a most grievous wound when those whom I begot in his gospel behave like this.

### Scripture references

- Rev 3:19: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 30:23 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Sir 30:24 (Vulgate 30:24; Greek 30:23); Rev 3:19. Allusion: 1 Cor 4:15. “Sabbath” here is Saturday.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 247.2 (CSEL 57:586–587; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-2).

## Letter 247.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-3
- Source: CSEL 57:587–588
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine refutes Romulus's excuses, showing that the tenants could not tell what he had ordered and must not be made to pay twice.

### Latin text

Iterum dicturus es: Non eis iussi, ut darent Ponticano. respondetur tibi: Sed iussisti, ut seruirent Ponticano; nec possent distinguere. quousque seruirent et quousque non seruirent. maxime cum ea peteret, quae se debere sciebant. tuas autem litteras habere debuerunt, quas proferrent actori, si te nolente exigebat, et relegerent ei non se debere dare, nisi cum tuas litteras accepissent. nam si uerbo aliquando iussisti, ne actori aliquid darent, multum est, ut meminerint, multum est, ut tu ipse memineris, an uere iusseris an ipsis iusseris an aliis an omnibus, maxime quia etiam nunc alteri actori audisti datum et saluam esse ipsam pecuniam et non tibi displicuit. quia dederunt. sed cum ego dixissem: Quid, si et iste interuertisset, ab ipsis iterum exigendum erat. rursus tibi coepit displicere, quia dederunt, et, cum mihi saepe dixisses numquam te iniunxisse uices tuas uel Valerio uel Aginesi, subito, cum de uino ageretur, quia debuerunt ostendere, si acescere coeperat, et diceretur tibi, quod absens erat, credo, excidit tibi, quid mihi totiens dixeras, et dixisti, quia habuerunt Aginesi ostendere et ex ipsius agere arbitrio. ibi ego cum dixissem: Certe uices tuas istis non soles iniungere. respondisti: Sed litteras meas habebat Aginesis, quasi semper illi, quibus aliquid iniungis, litteras tuas recitent rusticanis hominibus, ut credant, quia tu iussisti. sed quia eos uident tibi sic iniungi, non utique credunt temere illos aliquid audere praesumere nisi a te data potestate. ideoque inter ista incerta non apparet, quid iubeas, nec possunt firmum aliquid retinere, nisi litteras tuas habuerint, quas omnibus proferant et non nisi tuis litteris prolatis obtemperent, quando eis aliquid dandum est.

### English translation (Claude)

You will say again: “I did not order them to give to Ponticanus.” The answer to you is: “But you did order them to serve Ponticanus; and they could not distinguish how far they should serve him and how far not, especially when he asked for what they knew they owed.” They ought to have had your letter to produce to the agent, if he was demanding against your will, and to read out to him that they need not give except on receiving your letter. For if you once ordered by word that they give nothing to the agent, it is a lot to expect them to remember, a lot to expect you yourself to remember whether you really ordered it, and whether to them or to others or to all; especially since even now you have heard that it was given to another agent and the money itself is safe, and you were not displeased that they gave it. But when I had said, “What if he too had embezzled it, would it then have to be demanded from them again?”, you began to be displeased again that they had given it. And although you had often told me that you never delegated your authority to Valerius or Aginesis, suddenly, when the matter of the wine came up, since they ought to have shown it if it had begun to turn sour, and you were told that he was absent, I suppose you forgot what you had so often told me, and said that they should have shown it to Aginesis and acted at his discretion. Then, when I said, “Surely you do not usually delegate your authority to these men,” you answered, “But Aginesis had my letter,” as if those to whom you assign anything always read out your letter to country people so that they may believe you ordered it! But since they see them so assigned by you, they certainly do not believe that they would rashly dare to presume anything except by power given by you. So amid these uncertainties it is not clear what you order, and they can hold nothing firm unless they have your letter to produce to all, and obey only when your letter is produced, when something has to be given.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 247.3 (CSEL 57:587–588; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-3).

## Letter 247.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-4
- Source: CSEL 57:588–589
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine closes by saying he fears more for Romulus than for the tenants, and leaves the outcome to God.

### Latin text

Sed quid opus est tam diu tecum disputare et onerare uerbis occupationes tuas, ut forte, cum irasceris uerbis meis, uelis saeuire in homines miseros? illis inputabitur ad meritum bonum, quia pro salute tua, propter quam tibi tanta loquor, te patiuntur iratum; tibi autem nolo aliquid grauius dicere, ne putes me non timendo sed male optando tale aliquid loqui. time deum, si non uis decipi; ipsum testem inuoco super animam meam plus me tibi timere, cum haec dico, quam illis, pro quibus apud te intercedere uideor. si credis, deo gratias; si autem non credis, consolatur me, quod dominus ait: Dicite: Pax huic domui); et, si est ibi filius pacis, requiescet super eam pax uestra. si quo minus. ad uos reuertetur. dei misericordia te tueatur, domine dilectissime fili.

### English translation (Claude)

But what need is there to argue with you so long and burden your busy life with words, so that perhaps, angered by my words, you may want to rage against the poor men? It will be counted to them as good merit that they endure your anger for the sake of your salvation, for which I say so much to you; but to you I do not want to say anything harsher, lest you think I speak so not from fear but from ill will. Fear God, if you do not wish to be deceived. I call him as witness upon my soul that I fear more for you, when I say this, than for those for whom I seem to intercede with you. If you believe it, thanks be to God; but if you do not believe it, I am consoled by what the Lord says: “Say, ‘Peace to this house’; and if a son of peace is there, your peace will rest upon it; if not, it will return to you.” May God's mercy protect you, my lord, dearly beloved son.

### Scripture references

- Luke 10:5–6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 1:23: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Luke 10:5–6. Allusion: 2 Cor 1:23.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 247.4 (CSEL 57:588–589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/243-1/#p-247-4).

## Letter 248.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-248-1
- Source: CSEL 57:589–592
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine consoles Sebastianus, grieved by sinners who abandon God's law, saying such grief is the persecution of the godly and urging perseverance; Alypius adds a greeting.

### Latin text

Quamuis ab animo nostro nullo modo te separatum esse permittat dulce uinculum caritatis et indesinenter tuos sanctos mores atque conloquia recolamus, tamen bene fecisti et gratias agimus, quod nobis etiam corporalis salutis tuae nuntios apices mittendo nos plurimum exhilarasti. sensi autem in epistula tua, quod taedium te detinuerit a peccatoribus relinquentibus legem dei; illo enim spiritu uiuis, quo dictum est: Vidi insensatos et tabescebam. pia est ista tristitia et, si dici potest, beata miseria uitiis alienis tribulari non implicari, maerere non haerere, dolore contrahi non amore adtrahi, haec est persecutio, quam patiuntur omnes, qui uolunt in Christo pie uiuere secundum apostolicam mordacem ueracemque sententiam. quid enim sic persequitur uitam bonorum, quam uita iniquorum. non cum cogit imitari. quod displicet, sed cum cogit dolere. quod uidet, quoniam coram pio uiuens impie, etsi non obligat consentientem, cruciat sentientem? nam saepe et diu impiorum corporibus a saecularibus potestatibus et quorumlibet uexationibus parcitur. piorum autem cordibus a malis hominum moribus numquam usque ad huius saeculi finem. sic ergo potius impletur, quod commemoraui dixisse apostolum. quia omnes. qui uolunt pie in Christo uiuere, persecutionem patiuntur et tanto amarius quanto interius, donec diluuium transeat, ubi arca continet coruum et columbam. Sed inhaere, frater, illi, a quo audisti: Qui perseuerauerit usque in finem, hic saluus erit; coniungere domino. ut crescat in nouissimis tua uita. scio enim non deesse recreationem cordis de fratribus bonis. huc adiunge promissiones dei fideles, magnas, certas. sempiternas ipsiusque tolerantiae inperturbabilem ineffabilemque mercedem et uide, quam uerum domino cantes: Secundum multitudinem dolorum meorum in corde meo consolationes tuae iucundauerunt animam meam. mitte fratri Firmo litteras nostras. sanctitatem tuam et familiam dei, quae tuo ministerio gubernatur, fratres et sorores. quae apud nos sunt, nobiscum in domino resalutant. [Et alia manu: Incolumes pro nobis oretis, dilectissimi et sancti fratres. Ego Alypius inpensissime saluto sinceritatem tuam omnesque tibi in domino coniunctos atque, ut hanc tamquam meam epistulam deputes, peto; etsi enim aliam propriam mittere potuissem. tamen malui huic subscribere, ut unanimitatem nostram una etiam pagina testaretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Although the sweet bond of love in no way allows you to be separated from our mind, and we unceasingly recall your holy character and conversations, still you did well, and we thank you, that by sending us a letter announcing your bodily health too you greatly cheered us. But I sensed in your letter that weariness has gripped you because of sinners who abandon the law of God; for you live by that spirit in which it was said, “I saw the senseless and I wasted away.” This sadness is godly, and, if one may say so, it is a blessed misery to be troubled by others' vices and not entangled in them, to grieve and not cling, to be wrung by sorrow and not drawn in by love. This is the persecution that all suffer who wish to live godly in Christ, according to the apostle's biting and true saying. For what so persecutes the life of the good as the life of the wicked, not when it compels them to imitate what displeases them, but when it compels them to grieve at what they see? For one who lives impiously before a godly man, even if he does not bind him to consent, tortures him as he perceives. For often and for long the bodies of the impious are spared by worldly powers and by vexations of every kind, but the hearts of the godly are never spared by the evil ways of men until the end of this world. Thus rather is fulfilled what I mentioned the apostle said, that all who wish to live godly in Christ suffer persecution, and the more bitterly the more inwardly, until the flood passes, in which the ark holds both the raven and the dove. But cling, brother, to him from whom you heard, “Whoever perseveres to the end will be saved”; join yourself to the Lord, so that your life may grow in its last days. For I know that you do not lack refreshment of heart from good brothers. Add to this the promises of God, faithful, great, sure, eternal, and the untroubled and ineffable reward of patience itself, and see how truly you sing to the Lord: “According to the multitude of my sorrows in my heart, your consolations have gladdened my soul.” Send our letter to brother Firmus. The brothers and sisters who are with us join us in greeting in the Lord Your Holiness and the family of God that is governed by your ministry. [In another hand:] May you pray for us in safety, dearly beloved and holy brothers. I, Alypius, most warmly greet your sincerity and all who are joined to you in the Lord, and I ask you to count this letter as mine too; for although I could have sent another of my own, I preferred to sign this one, so that one page might also testify to our unanimity.

### Scripture references

- Ps 119:158 (118:158 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- 2 Tim 3:12: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 8:7–8: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 10:22: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 94:19 (93:19 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Sebastianus, an abbot. Quotations: Ps 119:158 (LXX 118:158); 2 Tim 3:12; Matt 10:22; Ps 94:19 (LXX 93:19). Allusion: Gen 8:6–12 (the ark, raven and dove as an image of the mixed Church).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 248.1 (CSEL 57:589–592; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-248-1).

## Letter 249.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-249-1
- Source: CSEL 57:592–593
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine recommends to the deacon Restitutus Tyconius's treatment of tolerating evil in the Church for the sake of unity, while pointing him to Scripture itself.

### Latin text

Aestus indicantes piam flammam cordis tui indicauit mihi fidelissimus, ut scis. particeps eorum. frater Deogratias. lege itaque Tychonium, quem bene nosti, non quidem omnia probaturus; nam quae in illo cauenda sint, bene nosti, hanc tamen quaestionem, quo modo in ecclesia dei, si qua forte peruersa uel etiam scelerata corrigere aut extinguere non ualemus, saluo unitatis uinculo toleranda sint, strenue mihi uidetur tractauisse atque soluisse. quamquam in eius litteris tantum modo intentione correcta ad ipsos diuinarum scripturarum fontes recurrere nos oportet, ut ibi uideamus, quam pauca de hac re testimonia sententiarum uel exempla gestorum posuit et quam nemo possit omnia ponere, nisi qui paene omnes sanctorum librorum paginas in sua scripta transferre uoluerit. ita prope nulla est, quae nos non admoneat intus in ipsa societate sacramentorum, quibus inbuimur ad uitam aeternam, cum his, qui oderunt pacem, esse debere pacificos, donec ingemescendo nostra longinqua peregrinatio transeat atque in uirtute Hierusalem matris aeternae securissima pace perfruamur et in turribus eius abundantia uerorum fratrum, quorum nunc inter multos falsos gemimus paucitatem. quae est autem uirtus illius ciuitatis nisi deus eius deus noster? uides igitur, in quo solo fiat pax et singulis hominibus, qui secum sine illo bellum gerunt et in nullo extrinsecus oborto scandalo, et omnibus simul, qui quamquam se in hac uita diligant et amicitiae fidae nexibus teneantur. tamen nec praesentia corporis nec consensione animi summe perfecteque copulentur. confortetur cor tuum in domino memor nostri.

### English translation (Claude)

The agitations that show the godly flame of your heart have been made known to me by brother Deogratias, who, as you know, most faithfully shares them. Read, then, Tyconius, whom you know well, not indeed to approve everything in him, for you know well what in him is to be guarded against; but this question, how things in the Church of God that we cannot correct or extinguish, however perverse or even criminal, are to be tolerated without breaking the bond of unity, he seems to me to have treated and solved vigorously. Yet with his writings we must only redirect our attention and run back to the very springs of the divine Scriptures, so as to see there how few testimonies of statements or examples of deeds on this matter he set down, and how no one could set down all of them unless he wished to transfer almost all the pages of the holy books into his own writings. So there is hardly a page that does not warn us that within the very fellowship of the sacraments, by which we are initiated into eternal life, we ought to be peaceable with those who hate peace, until, groaning, our long pilgrimage passes and we enjoy in most secure peace the strength of Jerusalem, our eternal mother, and in her towers the abundance of true brothers, whose fewness we now groan over among many false ones. And what is the strength of that city but its God, our God? You see, then, in what alone peace comes about: both for individual men, who without him wage war with themselves even when no stumbling block arises from outside, and for all together, who, although they love one another in this life and are held by bonds of faithful friendship, are yet joined neither by bodily presence nor by agreement of mind supremely and perfectly. May your heart be strengthened in the Lord, mindful of us.

### Scripture references

- Ps 120:7 (119:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Ps 122:7 (121:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Gal 4:26: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- To Restitutus. Tyconius was a Donatist writer whom Augustine valued on this point. Allusions: Ps 120:7 (LXX 119:7); Ps 122:7 (LXX 121:7); Gal 4:26.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 249.1 (CSEL 57:592–593; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-249-1).

## Letter 250.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-1
- Source: CSEL 57:593–595
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the young bishop Auxilius by what right he excommunicated Count Classicianus together with his whole household, since spiritual punishment binds souls and each soul answers for its own sin.

### Latin text

Vir spectabilis filius noster comes Classicianus grauiter apud me litteris questus est, quod sit anathematis iniuriam a tua sanctitate perpessus, narrans, quod uenerit ad ecclesiam apparitione paucorum suae potestati congrua comitatus et egerit tecum, ne contra salutem suam faueris eis, qui per euangelia peierando adiutorium uiolandae fidei in ipsa domo fidei requirebant; quos tamen considerantes. quid mali fecerint. non inde uiolenter abductos sed sponte dicit egressos atque hinc uenerationem tuam ita sibi suscensuisse, ut ecclesiasticorum confectione gestorum cum omni domo sua anathematis sententia feriretur. quibus litteris eius lectis non mediocriter aestuans cogitationibus magna cordis tempestate fluctuantibus apud tuam caritatem tacere non potui, ut, si habes de hac re sententiam certis rationibus uel scripturarum testimoniis exploratam, nos quoque docere digneris, quo modo recte anathemetur pro patris peccato filius aut pro mariti uxor aut pro domini seruus aut quisquam in domo etiam nondum natus, si eodem tempore, quo uniuersa domus est anathemate obligata, nascatur, nec ei possit per lauacrum regenerationis in mortis periculo subueniri. neque enim haec corporalis est poena, qua legimus quosdam contemptores dei cum suis omnibus, qui eiusdem impietatis participes non fuerunt, pariter interfectos. tunc quippe ad terrorem uiuentium mortalia corpora perimebantur quandoque utique moritura; spiritalis autem poena, qua fit, quod scriptum est: Quae ligaueritis in terra, erunt ligata et in caelo, animas obligat, de quibus dictum est: Anima patris mea est et anima filii mea est; anima, quae peccauerit, ipsa morietur.

### English translation (Claude)

Our son, the distinguished Count Classicianus, has complained gravely to me by letter that he has suffered the injury of anathema from Your Holiness. He relates that he came to the church accompanied by a few attendants befitting his office, and dealt with you so that you would not, against his safety, favor men who, having perjured themselves by the Gospels, were seeking help in the very house of faith to violate faith; yet, he says, considering what evil they had done, they were not dragged out from there by force but left of their own accord; and that thereupon Your Reverence was so angry with him that, by the drawing up of church proceedings, he was struck with the sentence of anathema together with his whole household. When I had read his letter, greatly agitated, my thoughts tossed in a great storm of the heart, I could not keep silent with Your Charity, so that, if you have a view on this matter proven by sure reasons or testimonies of the Scriptures, you may deign to teach us too how a son can rightly be anathematized for his father's sin, or a wife for her husband's, or a slave for his master's, or anyone in the household, even one not yet born, if he is born at the time when the whole household is bound by anathema and cannot be helped by the washing of regeneration in danger of death. For this is not a bodily punishment, such as that by which we read some despisers of God were killed together with all their family, who were not sharers in the same impiety. Then mortal bodies, which would surely die at some time, were destroyed to terrify the living; but spiritual punishment, by which is done what is written, “Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven also,” binds souls, of which it is said: “The soul of the father is mine and the soul of the son is mine; the soul that sins, it shall die.”

### Scripture references

- Num 16:32: allusion, medium confidence
- Matt 18:18: quotation, high confidence
- Ezek 18:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Auxilius, a newly ordained bishop. The case concerns men who had taken asylum in a church. Allusions: Num 16:31–33 (Korah); Josh 7:24–25 (Achan). Quotations: Matt 18:18; Ezek 18:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 250.1 (CSEL 57:593–595; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-1).

## Letter 250.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-2
- Source: CSEL 57:595–596
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he has never dared to excommunicate a whole household, since innocents would be punished and some might die unbaptized, and asks Auxilius for his reasons.

### Latin text

Audisti fortassis aliquos magni nominis sacerdotes cum domo sua quempiam anathemasse peccantium. sed forte, si essent interrogati, reperirentur idonei reddere inde rationem; ego autem, quoniam, si quis ex me quaerit, utrum recte fiat, quid ei respondeam, non inuenio, numquam hoc facere ausus sum, cum de quorundam facinoribus immaniter aduersus ecclesiam perpetratis grauissime commouerer. sed. si tibi forte, quam iuste fiat, dominus reuelauit, nequaquam in te aetatem tuam et honoris ecclesiastici rudimenta contemno. en adsum senex a iuuene et episcopus tot annorum a collega necdum anniculo paratissimus discere, quo modo possimus uel deo uel hominibus iustam reddere rationem, si animas innocentes pro scelere alieno, ex quo non trahunt sicut ex Adam, in quo omnes peccauerunt, originale peccatum, spiritali supplicio puniamus. etenim Classiciani filius etsi traxit ex patre noxam primi hominis sacro fonte baptismate expiandam, tamen quicquid. posteaquam genuit, peccati pater eius admisit, ubi particeps ipse non fuit, ad eum non pertinere quis ambigit? quid dicam de coniuge? quid de tot animabus in uniuersa familia? unde si una anima per istam seueritatem, qua tota domus ista anathemata est, sine baptismate de corpore exeundo perierit, innumerabilium mors corporum, si de ecclesia homines innocentes uiolenter abstrahantur et interficiantur, huic damno non potest comparari. si ergo de hac re potes reddere rationem, utinam et nobis rescribendo praestes, ut possimus et nos; si autem non potes, quid tibi est inconsulta commotione animi facere, unde si fueris interrogatus, responsionem rectam non uales inuenire?

### English translation (Claude)

You have perhaps heard that some bishops of great name have anathematized a sinner together with his household. But perhaps, if they had been asked, they would be found able to give a reason for it; I, however, since I find no answer to give if anyone asks me whether it is rightly done, have never dared to do it, though I was most gravely moved by the crimes of certain people monstrously committed against the Church. But if perhaps the Lord has revealed to you how justly it is done, I by no means despise in you your youth and the beginnings of your church office. Here I am, an old man ready to learn from a young one, and a bishop of so many years from a colleague not yet a year in office, how we can give a just account to God or to men if we punish with spiritual punishment innocent souls for another's crime, from which they do not inherit original sin as they do from Adam, in whom all sinned. For although Classicianus's son inherited from his father the guilt of the first man, to be expiated by the sacred font of baptism, yet who doubts that whatever sin his father committed after begetting him, in which he himself had no part, does not concern him? What shall I say of his wife? What of so many souls in the whole household? Hence, if one soul perishes by leaving the body without baptism through this severity by which this whole household has been anathematized, the death of countless bodies, if innocent men were dragged from the church by force and killed, cannot be compared with this loss. If, then, you can give a reason for this, I wish you would give it to us too by writing back, so that we can also; but if you cannot, what business have you to do, in a rash commotion of mind, something for which, if you are questioned, you cannot find a right answer?

### Scripture references

- Rom 5:12: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 5:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 250.2 (CSEL 57:595–596; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-2).

## Letter 250.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-3
- Source: CSEL 57:596–598
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Auxilius, if Classicianus did no wrong, to withdraw the sentence, admitting that bishops too can act in anger, and to restore peace.

### Latin text

Haec autem dixi. etiamsi filius noster Classicianus aliquid admisit, quod tibi anathemate plectendum iustissime uideretur. ceterum si ueras ad me litteras misit, nec solus in domo sua debuit ista correptione coherceri. sed hinc cum tua sanctitate nihil ago, nisi tantum peto, ut ignoscas precanti ueniam, si agnouerit culpam; si autem nihil eum peccasse prudenter agnoscis, quoniam ipse in domo fidei iustius flagitabat fidem debere seruari, ne ibi frangeretur, ubi docetur, fac, quod sanctum uirum facere oportet, ut, si tibi contigit tamquam homini, quod utique homo dei dicit in psalmo: Turbatus est prae ira oculus meus, exclames ad dominum: Miserere mei, domine. quoniam infirmus sum, ut porrigat tibi dexteram suam et comprimat iracundiam tuam et tranquillet mentem tuam ad uidendam faciendamque iustitiam. sicut enim scriptum est, iracundia uiri iustitiam dei non operatur. nec arbitreris ideo nobis non posse subrepere iniustam commotionem, quia episcopi sumus, sed potius cogitemus inter laqueos temptationum nos periculosissime uiuere, quia homines sumus. aufer itaque gesta ecclesiastica, quae perturbatior fortasse fecisti, et redeat inter uos caritas, quam cum illo et catechumenus habuisti; aufer litem et reuoca pacem, ne tibi pereat homo amicus et de uobis gaudeat diabolus inimicus. potens est autem misericordia dei nostri, qui et me exaudiat orantem, ne mea tristitia de uobis augeatur, sed potius, quae est exorta, sanetur, et te regat per gratiam suam et laetificet iuuentutem tuam non contemnentem senectutem meam.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said this even supposing our son Classicianus committed something that seemed to you most justly to deserve anathema. But if he has written me a true letter, he did not deserve to be restrained by this censure either, not even alone in his household. But on this point I do nothing with Your Holiness except to ask you to pardon him if he asks forgiveness, should he acknowledge a fault; but if you prudently recognize that he did not sin at all, since he was rather justly demanding that in the house of faith faith should be kept, so as not to be broken where it is taught, do what a holy man ought to do: if it has happened to you as a man, as the man of God certainly says in the psalm, “My eye is troubled because of anger,” cry out to the Lord, “Have mercy on me, Lord, for I am weak,” so that he may stretch out his right hand to you, restrain your anger, and calm your mind to see and do justice. For, as it is written, “the anger of man does not work the justice of God.” And do not think that unjust agitation cannot creep upon us because we are bishops; let us rather consider that we live most dangerously amid the snares of temptations, because we are men. So remove the church proceedings that you perhaps drew up when too agitated, and let the love return between you that you had with him even as a catechumen; remove the quarrel and recall peace, so that you may not lose a man who is a friend and the devil, an enemy, may not rejoice over you. The mercy of our God is able both to hear me as I pray that my sadness over you may not increase but rather that what has arisen may be healed, and to guide you by his grace and gladden your youth, which does not despise my old age.

### Scripture references

- Ps 6:7 (6:8 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 6:2 (6:3 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:20: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Ps 6:7 (LXX 6:8); Ps 6:2 (LXX 6:3); Jas 1:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 250.3 (CSEL 57:596–598; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-250-3).

## Letter 251.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-251-1
- Source: CSEL 57:599–600
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Pancarius, a landowner, that charges against the presbyter Secundinus will be heard only from Catholics, and asks him not to let the presbyter's house or church be harmed.

### Latin text

Cum, antequam ueniret religio tua, presbyter Secundinus Germanicianensibus non displiceret, unde modo factum est, ut eum, sicut scripsisti, etiam de nescio quibus criminibus accusare parati sint, nescio. domine dilectissime meritoque honorabilis fili. uerum tamen nullo modo nos possumus contemnere, quod presbytero uidentur obicere, tantum si catholici sunt, qui obiciunt; nam haereticorum accusationes contra catholicum presbyterum admittere nec possumus nec debemus. proinde hoc primo agat prudentia tua, ut haeretici non sint, ubi ante aduentum tuum non fuerunt, et audiemus causam presbyteri, sicut eam oportet audiri. illud sane moneo, quia dignaris, quoniam et salus et existimatio tua carissima nobis est et ipsi Germanicianenses pertinent ad curam humilitatis nostrae, ut ea, quae a gloriosissimis imperatoribus impetrasti, et ea, quae apud competentes iudices egisti, fidenter allegare digneris, ut appareat omnibus nihil te inordinate agere, ne iterum in causa uestra, qui de possessione contenditis, ipsi miseri fatigentur et grauius afflicti dispereant. simul etiam commendo, ut eiusdem presbyteri domus non diripiatur neque uastetur; nam de ecclesia sua nuntiatum est nobis, quod eam nescio qui uelint deponere; sed non puto, quod ullo pacto possit hoc a tua religione permitti.

### English translation (Claude)

Since, before Your Reverence came, the presbyter Secundinus was not displeasing to the people of Germaniciana, how it has now come about that, as you wrote, they are ready to accuse him even of some crimes or other, I do not know, my lord dearly beloved and justly honorable son. Yet we can by no means disregard what they seem to charge against the presbyter, but only if those who make the charges are Catholics; for we neither can nor should admit accusations by heretics against a Catholic presbyter. So let Your Prudence first see to it that there are no heretics where there were none before your coming, and we will hear the presbyter's case as it ought to be heard. I do advise this, since you are so kind, because both your welfare and your reputation are very dear to us, and the people of Germaniciana themselves belong to the care of our humility: please produce with confidence what you obtained from the most glorious emperors and what you did before the competent judges, so that it may appear to all that you do nothing irregularly, lest in your case, you who are contending over the estate, those poor people themselves be worn out again and perish more grievously afflicted. At the same time I also ask that the presbyter's house not be plundered or laid waste; for it has been reported to us that some want to pull down his church; but I do not think that this can in any way be permitted by Your Reverence.

### Translation notes

- To Pancarius.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 251.1 (CSEL 57:599–600; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-251-1).

## Letter 252.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-252-1
- Source: CSEL 57:600
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Felix that he cannot hand over an orphan girl entrusted to the church without consulting her guardian.

### Latin text

Nouit optime religio tua, quam curam tuendis cum omnibus hominibus tum maxime pupillis ecclesia uel episcopi debeant. unde receptis litteris tuis et exemplo litterarum uiri spectabilis fratris nostri nec potui nec debui passim puellam cuiquam committere, praesertim quia eam ecclesiae commendauit domine dilectissime meritoque honorabilis et praeferende frater. proinde aduentum eius expecto, ut, si quid fieri oporteat, eius praesentia deliberem et faciam, quod dominus faciendum esse inspirauerit.

### English translation (Claude)

Your Reverence knows very well what care the Church and the bishops owe to protecting all people, and especially orphans. So, having received your letter and a copy of the letter of our distinguished brother, I neither could nor should hand the girl over to anyone at random, especially since he entrusted her to the church, my lord dearly beloved, justly honorable and preeminent brother. Therefore I await his coming, so that, if anything should be done, I may deliberate in his presence and do what the Lord inspires to be done.

### Translation notes

- To Felix. This and the following letters concern an orphan girl under the church's protection.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 252.1 (CSEL 57:600; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-252-1).

## Letter 253.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-253-1
- Source: CSEL 57:600–601
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine advises Bishop Benenatus that, if he arranges the orphan girl's marriage, it should be with a Catholic household.

### Latin text

Per quem saluto sanctitatem tuam, de fide eius et bono circa ecclesiam studio gratulamur. uoluit autem ad tuam benignitatem cum litteris meis uenire, domine dilectissime et uenerabilis frater. et quoniam audiui, quod de negotio illo transigere cogitas, si uerum est, quod miror, si uerum est, nosti, quem ad modum debeas episcopali paternitate catholicae ecclesiae prouidere. ut non cum quolibet id agas, si tamen, ut dixi, uerum est, quod audiui, sed potius cum domo catholica, cuius non solum nullam aduersitatem uerum etiam fidele adiutorium habere possit ecclesia.

### English translation (Claude)

We congratulate the man through whom I greet Your Holiness on his faith and good zeal for the Church. He wished to come to your kindness with a letter from me, my lord dearly beloved and venerable brother. And since I have heard that you are thinking of settling that matter, if it is true, which I wonder at, if it is true, you know how you ought to provide for the Catholic Church with episcopal fatherliness: not to do it with just anyone, if indeed, as I said, what I have heard is true, but rather with a Catholic household, from which the Church can have not only no opposition but even faithful help.

### Translation notes

- To Benenatus, a bishop.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 253.1 (CSEL 57:600–601; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-253-1).

## Letter 254.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-254-1
- Source: CSEL 57:601–602
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains to Benenatus that the orphan girl is too young to be promised, may wish to be a nun, has relatives and perhaps a mother to be consulted, and so cannot yet be betrothed.

### Latin text

Puella, de qua mihi scripsit sanctitas tua, in ea uoluntate est, ut, si aetas ei iam matura esset, nulli in nuptiis conueniret. in ea uero aetate est, ut, si uoluntatem nubendi haberet, nulli adhuc dari uel promitti deberet. huc accedit, quia eam deus in ecclesia sic tuetur, ut contra inprobos tueatur, non ut, cui uoluero, tradi possit, sed ut. a quo non oportet. rapi non possit, domine Benenate dilectissime et uenerabilis frater. condicio itaque. quam insinuare dignatus es. non mihi displicet, si nuptura est; utrum autem nuptura sit, etsi illud, quod in ore habet, magis optamus, nunc tamen ignoramus. quia in his annis est, ut et. quod se dicit uelle esse sanctimonialem, iocus sit potius garrientis quam sponsio profitentis. deinde habet materteram. cuius uir honorabilis frater noster Felix, dum de hac re contulissem cum illo — neque enim possem aliter uel deberem —. non quidem inuitus accepit, immo etiam gratulatus est: sed iure amicitiae non importune doluit, quod eis nihil inde sit scriptum. fortassis enim. quae nunc non apparet, apparebit et mater, cuius uoluntatem in tradenda filia omnibus, ut arbitror, natura praeponit, nisi eadem puella in ea iam aetate fuerit, ut iure licentiore sibi eligat ipsa. quod uelit. illud quoque cogitet sinceritas tua, quia, si mihi de nuptiis eius potestas summa ac tota tribuatur atque ipsa quoque iam matura et nubere uolens, cui uoluero, se tradendam sub deo iudice mihi committat, sic dico et uerum dico mihi placere istam condicionem, ut propter deum iudicem non possim respuere meliorem. quae utrum aduentura sit, utique incertum est. quapropter uidet caritas tua. quanta consideranda concurrant, ut nunc a me cuiquam promitti omnino non possit.

### English translation (Claude)

The girl about whom Your Holiness wrote to me is of such a mind that, if she were already of mature age, she would agree to marry no one. But she is of such an age that, even if she had the wish to marry, she ought not yet to be given or promised to anyone. Add to this that God protects her in the Church in such a way as to protect her against the wicked, not so that she can be handed over to whomever I wish, but so that she cannot be carried off by anyone by whom she should not be, my lord Benenatus, dearly beloved and venerable brother. So the match you deigned to suggest does not displease me, if she is to marry; but whether she will marry, although we rather wish for what she has on her lips, we do not know now, since she is at such an age that her saying she wants to be a nun may be the jest of a chatterer rather than the pledge of one professing. Then she has a maternal aunt, whose husband, our honorable brother Felix, when I had conferred with him about this matter (for I neither could nor should do otherwise), did not take it unwillingly, indeed even rejoiced; but by the right of friendship he complained, not unreasonably, that nothing had been written to them about it. For perhaps her mother too, who does not appear now, will appear, whose will in giving her daughter in marriage nature puts before all others, I think, unless the girl herself is already of an age to choose for herself by a freer right what she wishes. Consider this too, my sincere friend: if supreme and complete power over her marriage were given to me, and she herself, being mature and willing to marry, entrusted herself to me to be given to whom I wished, under God as judge, I say, and I say truly, that this match pleases me, but in such a way that, because of God the judge, I could not reject a better one; and whether one will come is certainly uncertain. So Your Charity sees how many things must be considered together, so that she cannot be promised by me to anyone at all now.

### Translation notes

- The girl was evidently under marriageable age in Roman law.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 254.1 (CSEL 57:601–602; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-254-1).

## Letter 255.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-255-1
- Source: CSEL 57:602–603
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the pagan Rusticus that he cannot promise the orphan girl to his son, especially since a Christian girl could be given only to a Christian and his son is still a pagan.

### Latin text

Quamuis tibi et uniuersae domui tuae omnia bona optem nec tantum ad felicitatem praesentis saeculi pertinentia uerum etiam ad uitam futuram ac sempiternam, quae tibi nondum credenda persuasa est. tamen, quae me moueant, ut de puella, quam petis, nihil adhuc audeam polliceri, quantum sufficere uisum est, sancto fratri et coepiscopo meo Benenato rescripsi, domine dilectissime et uenerabilis fili. si enim tu, cum certissime noueris, etiamsi nostrae absolutae sit potestatis quamlibet puellam in coniugium tradere, tradi a nobis Christianam nisi Christiano non posse, nihil tamen mihi tale de filio tuo, quem adhuc paganum audio, promittere uoluisti, quanto magis ego propter illa, quae in epistula memorati fratris mei legere poteris quicquam de illius puellae conubio spondere non debeo, etiamsi,quod dixi de filio tuo, non tantum promissum tenerem, sed iam etiam factum esse gauderem!

### English translation (Claude)

Although I wish you and your whole household all good things, not only those belonging to the happiness of this present world but also those belonging to the future and eternal life, which you have not yet been persuaded to believe, yet I have written back to my holy brother and fellow bishop Benenatus, as much as seemed sufficient, what moves me not to dare to promise anything yet about the girl you ask for, my lord dearly beloved and venerable son. For if you, though you know most certainly that, even if we had absolute power to give any girl in marriage, a Christian girl could not be given by us except to a Christian, nevertheless did not wish to promise me any such thing about your son, whom I hear is still a pagan, how much less ought I, because of the things you will be able to read in the letter of my brother I mentioned, to pledge anything about that girl's marriage, even if I not only held a promise about your son, as I said, but rejoiced that it had already come about!

### Translation notes

- To Rusticus, a pagan.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 255.1 (CSEL 57:602–603; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-255-1).

## Letter 256.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-256-1
- Source: CSEL 57:603–604
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine answers Christinus's request for a letter, contrasting the easy fruitful way of God that people fear with the hard barren way of the world they endure.

### Latin text

Epistulam meam desiderare te mihi tua epistula nuntiauit; frater autem Iacobus eius desiderii erga nos tui locupletior testis accessit, quia plura mihi de te suauia atque in se ipso experta locutus est, quam illa parua chartula potuit. unde tuae benignitati congratulor et de tuo pectore Christiano domino deo nostro, cuius haec dona sunt, gratias ago, domine merito praedicande sinceriterque carissime ac desiderantissime frater. quod autem petis, ut litteris te quaeram, ego te affectu quaero, qui omnes litteras superat, et, ubi te quaeram, quod bene intellegas, noui. quantum autem ad me legendam adtinet, magis uereor in manibus uestris loquacitatem meam reprehendi quam eloquium requiri. illud breuiter dixerim, quod diuturna cogitatione si ruminaueris, senties, quid sapiat: cum in itinere dei faciliora et fructuosa ignaua formidine fugiuntur, in itinere saeculari duriora et sterilia aerumnoso labore tolerantur. incolumis in Christo uigeas et proficias, domine merito praedicande sinceriterque carissime ac desiderantissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

Your letter told me that you wanted a letter from me; and brother James came as a richer witness of that desire of yours toward us, since he told me more pleasant things about you, and experienced in himself, than that little sheet could. So I congratulate your kindness, and thank the Lord our God, whose gifts these are, for your Christian heart, my lord justly praiseworthy, sincerely dearest and most longed-for brother. As for your asking me to seek you by letter, I seek you with an affection that surpasses all letters, and I know you understand well where I seek you. But as for reading me, I fear more that my talkativeness may be criticized in your hands than that eloquence may be looked for. Let me say this briefly, and if you chew on it in long thought you will taste what it savors of: when on the way of God easier and fruitful things are fled from with lazy fear, on the way of the world harder and barren things are endured with wretched labor. May you be safe in Christ, flourish and make progress, my lord justly praiseworthy, sincerely dearest and most longed-for brother.

### Translation notes

- To Christinus.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 256.1 (CSEL 57:603–604; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-256-1).

## Letter 257.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-257-1
- Source: CSEL 57:604–605
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine thanks Orontius for his letter and expresses hope that he will share in the source of holiness, God's grace.

### Latin text

Ago gratias, quod aduentum eximietatis tuae litteris etiam praeuenire dignatus es et ante contuitum misisti conloquium, ut tuo prius affatu quam aspectu frueremur et diu desideratam notitiam epistulari solacio quodam modo praegustantes expectaremus auidius et ardentius, quod iucundius gratiusque caperemus, domine eximie meritoque honorabilis et suscipiende fili. reddo itaque meritis tuis et praecurrentibus officiis debitum resalutationis obsequium incolumitatem tuam gaudens nuntiatam optansque continuam. et quod rescripta exiguitatis meae iure praerogatae beniuolentiae reposcendo addidisti dicens: Si tamen id de tanta sanctitate possumus promereri, nullo modo audeo desperare sanctitatis eiusdem, cuius haustu pro nostro modulo aliquid sumus, ipsum fontem non solum laudandum uerum etiam nobiscum participandum tuae prudentiae placiturum, ut deus incomparabiliter atque incommutabiliter bonus per suam potentiam tam bonae tuae mentis institutor sit etiam per gratiam restitutor. incolumem te deus omnipotens felicioremque tueatur, domine eximie meritoque honorabilis ac suscipiende fili.

### English translation (Claude)

I thank you for deigning to send a letter even before Your Excellency's arrival, and for sending conversation before sight, so that we might enjoy your address before your appearance, and, foretasting with a kind of letter's consolation the long-desired acquaintance, might await more eagerly and ardently what we would receive the more pleasantly and gratefully, my excellent lord, justly honorable and esteemed son. So I return to your merits and your forerunning courtesies the due service of a return greeting, rejoicing that your safety has been announced and wishing that it may continue. And as for your adding, in asking by the right of your prior goodwill for a reply from my littleness, “if indeed we can deserve this from such holiness,” I by no means dare to despair that it will please your prudence that the very fountain of that holiness, by drinking from which we are something in our small measure, should be not only praised but also shared with us, so that God, incomparably and unchangeably good, who by his power formed so good a mind of yours, may also by his grace restore it. May God almighty keep you safe and happier, my excellent lord, justly honorable and esteemed son.

### Translation notes

- To Orontius, evidently not yet a baptized Christian.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 257.1 (CSEL 57:604–605; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-257-1).

## Letter 258.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-1
- Source: CSEL 57:605–606
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells his old friend Marcianus that by Cicero's definition their friendship was incomplete until they agreed on divine things as well as human.

### Latin text

Abripui uel potius subripui et quodam modo furatus sum memet ipsum multis occupationibus meis. ut tibi scriberem antiquissimo amico, quem tamen non habebam, quam diu in Christo non tenebam. nosti quippe, ut definierit amicitiam Romani, ut ait quidam, maximus auctor Tullius eloquii. dixit enim et uerissime dixit: Amicitia est rerum humanarum et diuinarum cum beniuolentia et caritate consensio. tu autem, mi carissime, aliquando mihi consentiebas in rebus humanis, cum eis more uulgi frui cuperem, et mihi ad ea capessenda, quorum me paenitet. fauendo uelificabas, immo uero uela cupiditatum mearum cum ceteris tunc dilectoribus meis inter praecipuos aura laudis inflabas. porro in rebus diuinis, quarum mihi illo tempore nulla eluxerat ueritas, utique in maiore illius definitionis parte nostra amicitia claudicabat: erat enim rerum tantum modo humanarum non etiam diuinarum quamuis cum beniuolentia et caritate consensio.

### English translation (Claude)

I have snatched, or rather stolen, and in a way pilfered myself from my many occupations to write to you, a very old friend, whom yet I did not have as long as I did not hold you in Christ. For you know how Tully, as someone says, “the greatest author of Roman eloquence,” defined friendship. For he said, and said most truly: “Friendship is agreement on things human and divine, with goodwill and love.” But you, my dearest, once agreed with me in human things, when I wanted to enjoy them in the manner of the crowd, and by your favor you set sail with me toward those things I am now sorry for; indeed, among my chief admirers at that time you filled the sails of my desires with the breeze of praise. But in divine things, of which no truth had then shone on me, our friendship was lame in the greater part of that definition: for it was agreement only on things human, not also divine, although with goodwill and love.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Lucan, 7.62 (Lucan, Civil War): quotation, high confidence
- Cicero, Amic. 20 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Marcianus. “The greatest author of Roman eloquence”: Lucan, Pharsalia 7.62–63. Cicero, On Friendship (Laelius) 20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 258.1 (CSEL 57:605–606; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-1).

## Letter 258.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-2
- Source: CSEL 57:606–607
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that without agreement in divine things there is no true agreement even in human things, so Marcianus is only now truly his friend.

### Latin text

Et posteaquam illa cupere destiti, tu quidem perseuerante beniuolentia saluum me esse cupiebas salute mortali et ea rerum prosperitate felicem, quam mundus optare consueuit. et iam sic itaque aliquantum tibi erat mecum rerum humanarum beniuola et cara consensio. nunc ergo quantum de te gaudeo, quibus explicem uerbis, quando eum, quem quoquo modo habui diu amicum, habeo iam uerum amicum? accessit enim rerum etiam consensio diuinarum. quoniam, qui mecum temporalem uitam quondam iucundissima benignitate duxisti, nunc in spe uitae aeternae mecum esse coepisti. modo uero etiam de rebus humanis inter nos nulla dissensio est, qui eas rerum (diuinarum) cognitione pensamus. ne plus eis tribuamus. quam modus earum iustissime postulat, nec eas iniquo contemptu abiciendo creatori earum domino rerum caelestium atque terrestrium faciamus iniuriam. ita fit, ut, inter quos amicos non est rerum consensio diuinarum, nec humanarum esse plena possit ac uera. necesse est enim, ut aliter, quam oportet, humana aestimet, qui diuina contemnit, nec hominem recte diligere nouerit, quisquis eum non diligit, qui hominem fecit. proinde non dico: Nunc mihi plenius amicus es, qui eras ex parte, sed, quantum ratio indicat, nec ex parte eras, quando nec in rebus humanis mecum amicitiam ueram tenebas. rerum quippe diuinarum. ex quibus recte humana pensantur, socius mihi nondum eras, siue quando nec ipse in eis eram siue posteaquam ego eas utcumque sapere coepi, a quibus tu, longe abhorrebas.

### English translation (Claude)

And after I stopped desiring those things, you, with persevering goodwill, wanted me safe with a mortal safety and happy with that prosperity which the world is accustomed to wish for. So even then there was some measure of kindly and loving agreement between us in human things. Now, then, with what words can I explain how much I rejoice over you, when I have as a true friend one whom I long had as a friend in some fashion? For agreement on divine things too has been added, since you, who once spent temporal life with me in most delightful kindness, have now begun to be with me in the hope of eternal life. And now there is no disagreement between us even about human things, since we weigh them by the knowledge of divine things, so as not to attribute more to them than their measure most justly demands, nor, by rejecting them with unjust contempt, to do injury to their Creator, the Lord of things heavenly and earthly. So it happens that, among friends between whom there is no agreement on divine things, there cannot be full and true agreement even on human things. For he who despises divine things must value human things otherwise than he ought, and whoever does not love him who made man does not know how to love man rightly. Therefore I do not say, “Now you are more fully my friend, who were so in part,” but, as reason shows, you were not my friend even in part, since you did not hold true friendship with me even in human things. For you were not yet my companion in divine things, by which human things are rightly weighed, whether when I myself was not in them, or after I began in some measure to taste them, from which you shrank far away.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 258.2 (CSEL 57:606–607; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-2).

## Letter 258.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-3
- Source: CSEL 57:607–608
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that while he loved iniquity he was his own enemy, so Marcianus, sharing his worldly aims, could not then be a true friend.

### Latin text

Nolo autem suscenseas nec tibi uideatur absurdum, quod illo tempore, cum in uana mundi huius aestuarem, quamuis me multum amare uidereris. nondum eras amicus meus, quando nec ipse mihi amicus eram sed potius inimicus. diligebam quippe iniquitatem et uera, quia diuina, sententia est. qua scriptum est in sanctis libris: Qui autem diligit iniquitatem, odit animam suam. cum ergo odissem animam meam, uerum amicum quo modo habere poteram ea mihi optantem, in quibus ipse me ipsum patiebar inimicum? cum uero benignitas et gratia saluatoris nostri inluxit mihi non secundum merita mea sed secundum ipsius misericordiam. tu ab hac alienus quo modo esse poteras amicus meus, qui, unde beatus esse possem, penitus ignorabas et non in hoc me amabas, in quo mihi ipse iam fueram utcumque amicus effectus?

### English translation (Claude)

Do not be angry, and do not think it absurd, that at that time, when I was burning in the vanities of this world, though you seemed to love me much, you were not yet my friend, since I was not a friend to myself but rather an enemy. For I loved iniquity, and true, because divine, is the saying written in the holy books: “But he who loves iniquity hates his own soul.” Since, then, I hated my own soul, how could I have a true friend who wished me the things in which I was suffering myself as my own enemy? But when the kindness and grace of our Savior shone on me, not according to my merits but according to his mercy, how could you, a stranger to it, be my friend, since you were utterly ignorant of what could make me happy and did not love me in that respect in which I had already become in some measure a friend to myself?

### Scripture references

- Ps 11:5 (10:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Titus 3:4–5: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: Ps 11:5 (LXX 10:6, Old Latin); Titus 3:4–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 258.3 (CSEL 57:607–608; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-3).

## Letter 258.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-4
- Source: CSEL 57:608–609
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the two great commandments supply agreement on divine and human things, making his friendship with Marcianus true and eternal.

### Latin text

Gratias itaque domino, quod te mihi amicum facere tandem aliquando dignatur. nunc enim nobis est rerum humanarum et diuinarum cum beniuolentia et caritate consensio in Christo Iesu domino nostro uerissima pace nostra. qui duobus praeceptis cuncta praeconia diuina conclusit dicens: Diliges dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et ex tota mente tua et: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum: in his duobus praeceptis tota lex pendet et prophetae. in illo primo rerum diuinarum. in hoc secundo rerum humanarum est cum beniuolentia et caritate consensio. haec duo si mecum firmissime teneas, amicitia nostra uera ac sempiterna erit et non solum inuicem nos sed etiam ipsi domino sociabit.

### English translation (Claude)

Thanks be to the Lord, then, that at long last he deigns to make you my friend. For now we have agreement on things human and divine, with goodwill and love, in Christ Jesus our Lord, our most true peace, who summed up all the divine proclamations in two commandments, saying: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind,” and, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself; on these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” In the first is agreement on divine things, in the second on human things, with goodwill and love. If you hold these two most firmly with me, our friendship will be true and eternal, and will unite us not only to each other but also to the Lord himself.

### Scripture references

- Matt 22:37–40: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 2:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Matt 22:37–40. Allusion: Eph 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 258.4 (CSEL 57:608–609; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-4).

## Letter 258.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-5
- Source: CSEL 57:609–611
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Marcianus to enroll for baptism, citing Terence and Virgil's Fourth Eclogue, which he says may echo a Sibylline prophecy of Christ.

### Latin text

Quod ut fiat, exhortor grauitatem et prudentiam tuam. ut iam etiam fidelium sacramenta percipias; decet enim aetatem et congruit, quantum credo. moribus tuis. memento, quid mihi dixeris profecturo comicum quidem de Terentio recolens uersum sed tamen aptissimum et utilissimum: Nunc hic dies aliam uitam adfert, alios mores postulat. quod si ueraciter dixisti. sicut de te dubitare non debeo. iam profecto sic uiuis, ut sis dignus baptismo salutari remissionem praeteritorum accipere peccatorum. nam omnino non est, cui alteri praeter dominum Christum dicat genus humanum: Te duce, si qua manent sceleris uestigia nostri, inrita perpetua soluent formidine terras. quod ex Cymaeo, id est ex Sibyllino carmine se fassus est transtulisse Vergilius, quoniam fortassis etiam illa uates aliquid de unico saluatore in spiritu audierat, quod necesse habuit confiteri. haec tibi, domine merito suscipiende et in Christo dilectissime ac desiderantissime frater, siue pauca siue forsitan multa sint, utcumque occupatissimus scripsi. tua sumere rescripta desidero et te nomen uel dedisse inter competentes uel daturum esse iam iamque cognoscere. dominus deus, in quem credidisti, et hic et in futuro saeculo te conseruet. domine merito suscipiende et in Christo dilectissime ac desiderantissime frater.

### English translation (Claude)

That this may come about, I exhort your gravity and prudence now to receive the sacraments of the faithful as well; for it befits your age and suits, I believe, your character. Remember what you said to me as I was leaving, recalling a line from Terence, a comic one, but most apt and useful: “This day brings another life and demands other ways.” If you said it truly, as I ought not to doubt of you, you surely now live so as to be worthy to receive in saving baptism the remission of past sins. For there is absolutely no one but the Lord Christ to whom the human race can say: “Under your leadership, if any traces of our crime remain, they will be undone and free the lands from perpetual fear.” Virgil admitted that he took this from the Cumaean, that is, the Sibylline song, since perhaps that prophetess too had heard something in the spirit about the only Savior, which she had to confess. These things, my lord justly esteemed and in Christ dearly beloved and most longed-for brother, whether few or perhaps many, I have written somehow, being very busy. I long to receive your reply and to learn that you have given in your name among the candidates for baptism, or are about to give it at any moment. May the Lord God, in whom you have believed, keep you both here and in the world to come, my lord justly esteemed and in Christ dearly beloved and most longed-for brother.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Terence, Andr. 189 (Terence): quotation, high confidence
- Virgil, Ecl. 4.13–14 (Virgil): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Terence, Andria 189. Virgil, Eclogue 4.13–14; the Cumaean song is mentioned in Ecl. 4.4. “The candidates” (competentes): those enrolled for baptism at Easter.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 258.5 (CSEL 57:609–611; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-258-5).

## Letter 259.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-1
- Source: CSEL 57:611–612
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the widower Cornelius, who asked for a letter of consolation praising his wife, that he must first live chastely, since his own conduct is unlike hers.

### Latin text

Scripsisti mihi, ut ad te aliquam prolixam consolatoriam epistulam darem, quod grauiter optimae uxoris morte mouereris, sicut sanctum Paulinum ad Macarium fecisse meministi. et illa quidem anima in societatem recepta fidelium atque castarum laudes nec curat nec quaerit humanas, sed quia propter eos fiunt ista, qui uiuunt. prius est, ut tu, qui consolari eius laude desideras, ita uiuas, ut illic. ubi ipsa est, esse merearis. neque enim dubito, quod eam non credas ibi esse, ubi illae sunt, quae uel adulteriis lectulum coniugalem polluerunt uel nullo coniugio deligatae fornicatione fluxerunt. quare de illius laude uiro longe dissimili quasi fugare uelle maestitiam adulatio est non consolatio. nam si eam diligeres, sicut te ipsa dilexit, seruasses ei, quod tibi ipsa seruauit; et cum illa, si prior obisses, nullo modo credenda sit cuiquam fuisse nuptura, nonne, si uere obitum eius laudibus eius consolandus doleres, ne unam quidem ac licitam post illam coniugem quaereres?

### English translation (Claude)

You wrote asking me to send you a long letter of consolation, since you are gravely moved by the death of your excellent wife, as you remember holy Paulinus did for Macarius. That soul, indeed, received into the company of the faithful and chaste, neither cares for nor seeks human praises; but since these things are done for the sake of the living, the first thing is that you, who wish to be consoled by her praise, should live so as to deserve to be where she is. For I do not doubt that you do not believe her to be where those women are who either polluted the marriage bed by adulteries or, bound by no marriage, ran loose in fornication. Therefore, to want to drive away sadness by praising her to a husband far unlike her is flattery, not consolation. For if you loved her as she loved you, you would have kept for her what she kept for you; and since she, if you had died first, is by no means to be believed to have married anyone else, would you not, if you truly grieved over her death so as to be consoled by her praises, refrain from seeking even one lawful wife after her?

### Translation notes

- To Cornelius, a layman known for loose living. Augustine says even a lawful second marriage would fall short of her fidelity; this is moral exhortation, not a ruling against remarriage.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 259.1 (CSEL 57:611–612; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-1).

## Letter 259.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-2
- Source: CSEL 57:612
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine defends his severity toward Cornelius, adapting Cicero's words against Catiline to his pastoral duty.

### Latin text

Hic tu dicturus es: Quid mecum aspere agis? quid dure obiurgas? nonne inter haec uerba ecce senuimus. dum uita ducitur prius finienda quam corrigenda? uis. ut ignoscam exitiabili securitati tuae; quanto satius tu ignoscis si non amabili certe miserabili sollicitudini meae! inimico quidem animo Tullius inuehebatur et longe aliter erat terrenam rem publicam gubernantis intentio et tamen ait: Cupio, patres conscripti, me esse clementem, cupio in tantis rei publicae periculis non dissolutum uideri. quanto iustius ego dico, cum ipse noueris, quam tibi amicum animum geram, in aeternae ciuitatis seruitio constitutus minister uerbi sacramentique diuini: Cupio, frater Corneli, me esse clementem, cupio in tantis tuis meisque periculis non dissolutum uideri!

### English translation (Claude)

Here you will say: “Why do you deal with me so harshly? Why do you rebuke me so severely?” Have we not grown old amid these words, while life is led to be ended before it is corrected? You want me to pardon your deadly unconcern; how much better that you pardon my anxiety, if not lovable, at least pitiable! Tully, indeed, was inveighing with a hostile mind, and the purpose of one governing an earthly state was far different, and yet he said: “I desire, senators, to be merciful; I desire not to seem lax amid such great dangers to the state.” How much more justly do I say, since you know what a friendly mind I bear toward you, set as I am in the service of the eternal city as a minister of the divine word and sacrament: “I desire, brother Cornelius, to be merciful; I desire not to seem lax amid such great dangers, yours and mine!”

### Extrabiblical texts

- Cicero, Cat. 1.4 (Cicero): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Cicero, Against Catiline 1.4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 259.2 (CSEL 57:612; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-2).

## Letter 259.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-3
- Source: CSEL 57:612–614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rebukes Cornelius, a baptized old friend from his Manichaean days, for keeping many concubines while asking praise for his chaste dead wife.

### Latin text

Plebs mulierum excubat lateribus tuis; crescit in dies pellicum numerus; eiusdem autem numeri dominum, immo uero seruum insatiabili per tot scorta libidine diffluentem et laudes defunctae castae coniugis a nobis uelut ad mitigandam maestitiam suam iure amicitiae flagitantem episcopi patienter audimus? cum esses non dicam catechumenus sed in errore nobiscum perniciosissimo constitutus iuuenis iunioribus nobis, ab hoc te uitio temperantissima uoluntate correxeras, quo non post longum tempus sordidius reuolutus deinde in extremo uitae periculo baptizatus non dicam te fideli sed etiam nobis ecce iam senibus et insuper episcopis nondum emendaris. uis de bonae uxoris morte per nos consolari; nos de hac tua ueriore morte quis consolatur? an, quia non possumus obliuisci tanta erga nos merita tua, ideo cruciandi adhuc sumus moribus tuis, ideo contemnendi et pro nihilo habendi, quando gemimus ad te de te? sed fatemur nos non esse aliquid ad te corrigendum ac sanandum; deus adtendatur, Christus cogitetur. apostolus audiatur dicens: Tollens ergo membra Christi faciam membra meretricis? si qualiscumque episcopi amici tui uerba spernis in corde tuo, corpus domini tui cogita in corpore tuo. postremo quonam de die in diem differendo peccas, cum extremum diem tuum nescias?

### English translation (Claude)

A crowd of women keeps watch at your sides; the number of concubines grows daily; and are we bishops patiently to listen to the master of that number, or rather its slave, flowing away in insatiable lust through so many harlots, demanding of us by right of friendship praises of his dead chaste wife, as if to soothe his grief? When you were, I will not say a catechumen, but caught with us in a most pernicious error, a young man with us when we were younger, you had corrected yourself of this vice with most temperate resolve; you fell back into it more foully not long after, and then, baptized in extreme danger of life, you have not yet been corrected, I will not say for a faithful man, but even for us, now old men and bishops besides. You want to be consoled by us for the death of a good wife; who consoles us for this truer death of yours? Or, because we cannot forget your great services to us, must we therefore still be tormented by your ways, and therefore despised and counted as nothing, when we groan to you about you? But we confess that we are nothing for correcting and healing you; let God be attended to, let Christ be thought of, let the apostle be heard saying: “Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot?” If in your heart you spurn the words of a bishop, your friend, of whatever worth, think of your Lord's body in your body. Finally, why do you sin, putting it off from day to day, when you do not know your last day?

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 6:15: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- “A most pernicious error”: Manichaeism, which Augustine and Cornelius shared in youth. Quotation: 1 Cor 6:15.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 259.3 (CSEL 57:612–614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-3).

## Letter 259.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-4
- Source: CSEL 57:614
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine offers to praise Cornelius's wife Cypriana once Cornelius pays the “fee” of becoming chaste himself.

### Latin text

Nunc probabo, quantum ab ore nostro laudes Cyprianae desideres. certe. si adhuc in schola rhetoris uerba discipulis uenderem, prius ab eis mercedem sumerem. uendere tibi uolo laudem pudicissimae uxoris tuae: prius mihi mercedem da pudicitiam tuam: da. inquam, et accipe. humanum dico propter infirmitatem tuam: puto, quod non sit a te digna Cypriana, cuius laudibus anteponas amorem concubinarum tuarum, quod utique facies, si permanere in illo amore quam. ad istas laudes peruenire malueris. quid mihi uis extorquere poscendo, cum pro te uideas esse, quod posco? quid precaris subiectus. quod potes iubere correctus? mittamus munera spiritui coniugis tuae. tu imitationem. ego laudem. quamquam, sicut supra dixi, laudem ab hominibus iam illa non quaerat, imitationem uero tuam tantum quaerit etiam defuncta, quantum dilexit etiam dissimilem uiua. faciam de illa, quod uis, cum tu feceris. quod et ego uolo et illa.

### English translation (Claude)

Now I will test how much you want praises of Cypriana from my mouth. Certainly, if I were still selling words to pupils in a school of rhetoric, I would take my fee from them first. I want to sell you the praise of your most chaste wife: first give me the fee, your chastity; give it, I say, and receive. I speak in human terms because of your weakness: I think Cypriana is not worthy of you if you put the love of your concubines before her praises, which you will certainly do if you prefer to remain in that love rather than to come to these praises. Why do you want to wring something from me by asking, when you see that what I ask is for your own good? Why do you beg as a subject for what you could command if corrected? Let us send gifts to your wife's spirit: you imitation, I praise. Although, as I said above, she no longer seeks praise from men, she seeks your imitation even in death as much as she loved you, unlike her, in life. I will do what you wish about her when you have done what both I and she wish.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 259.4 (CSEL 57:614; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-4).

## Letter 259.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-5
- Source: CSEL 57:614–616
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from the parable of the rich man and Lazarus that Cornelius's chaste wife would not want him to share the punishment of adulterers, and urges him to love her by amending his life.

### Latin text

Si enim diues ille superbus atque impius. sicut in euangelio dominus loquitur, qui induebatur purpura et bysso et epulabatur cotidie splendide, cum malorum meritorum poenas apud inferos lueret neque de digito contempti ante ianuam suam pauperis aquae stillam impetrare ualuisset. recordatus est quinque fratres suos et rogauit ad eos eundem pauperem mitti, cuius requiem in sinu Abrahae longe prospiciebat, ne et ipsi uenirent in illum tormentorum locum, quanto magis tua coniux te recordatur! quanto magis te casta non uult ad poenas uenire moechorum, si fratres suos nec superbus ad poenas uenire uoluit superborum! et cum frater nollet fratribus in malis se esse coniunctum, quanto minus uult in bonis constituta coniux uirum in malis habere separatum! lege ipsum locum in euangelio: Christi est uox pia; crede deo. doles uidelicet coniugem mortuam et putas, si eam laudauero, quod meis affatibus consolaberis. disce. quod doleas. si cum illa non eris. an magis tibi dolendum est, quod a me nondum laudatur, quam mihi, quod a te non amatur? nam utique, si amares, cum illa esse post mortem desiderares, quo profecto non eris, si, qualis es, talis eris. ama ergo, cuius exigis laudem. ne, quod mendaciter exigis, iuste negem. [Et alia manu:] Dominus nobis praestet de tua salute gaudere, domine dilectissime et honorabilis frater.

### English translation (Claude)

For if that proud and impious rich man, as the Lord says in the Gospel, who was clothed in purple and fine linen and feasted splendidly every day, when he was paying the penalty of his evil deeds in the underworld and could not obtain a drop of water from the finger of the poor man he had despised before his door, remembered his five brothers and asked that the same poor man, whose rest in Abraham's bosom he saw far off, be sent to them, so that they too might not come to that place of torment, how much more does your wife remember you! How much more does the chaste one not want you to come to the punishment of adulterers, if even the proud man did not want his brothers to come to the punishment of the proud! And if a brother did not want his brothers joined to him in evils, how much less does a wife set among the good want to have her husband separated in evils! Read the passage itself in the Gospel: it is the loving voice of Christ; believe God. You grieve, of course, over your dead wife, and think that if I praise her you will be consoled by my words. Learn what to grieve over: if you will not be with her. Or ought you to grieve more that she is not yet praised by me than I that she is not loved by you? For surely, if you loved her, you would desire to be with her after death, where you certainly will not be if you remain as you are. Love, then, the one whose praise you demand, lest I justly refuse what you deceitfully demand. [In another hand:] May the Lord grant us to rejoice over your salvation, my lord dearly beloved and honorable brother.

### Scripture references

- Luke 16:19–31: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Luke 16:19–31. “Adulterers” renders moechorum; Augustine treats Cornelius's concubinage as adultery.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 259.5 (CSEL 57:614–616; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/248-1/#p-259-5).

## Letter 260.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-260-1
- Source: CSEL 57:616–617
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Audax praises Augustine extravagantly, complains that his letter was too short, asks for more of his wisdom, and adds five lines of verse.

### Latin text

Habeo gratiam beatitudini tuae, quod libenter mei sumpseris temptamenta sermonis; tunc enim bonae fidei filiis datur audacia. cum paterni fontis imbribus fuerit inrorata. prouocaui itaque, dulcis antistes, non ut praelargi pectoris pusillum libamen acciperem, sed ut ingens diuitis ubertim flumen haurirem. thesaurum sapientiae desideraui, sed minus accepi, quam uolui, licet minus non debet dici sed munus. quod oraculum legis contulerit Augustinus, sacrator iustitiae, instaurator spiritalis gloriae, dispensator salutis aeternae. tam tibi mundanus orbis notus est quam notatus, tam tu ei cognitus quam probatus. opto itaque sapientiae floribus pasci et uiui fontis haustibus inrigari. praesta cupienti, quod utrique prosit. potest enim seminudi roboris uelamen genitale uiridari, si meruerit tuis sensim fluentis augeri. itaque humilitatis meae praesentiam spondeo non tam stilo quam uoto, si uenerabilitatis tuae scripta pro uisu relegero. diuina te clementia tueatur annis innumeris, domine uenerabilis. Cur mihi fons orbis paruo sermone meauit? an minus apta suis sperauit corda fluentis? cum pateat mens omnis aquis spectetque loquacem religionis opem, gratos dat sensibus imbres, expectat quos plena fides Christi de stipite pendens.

### English translation (Claude)

I am grateful to Your Blessedness for gladly receiving the trial of my speech; for sons of good faith are given boldness when they have been watered by the showers of the paternal fountain. So I provoked you, sweet bishop, not to receive a small libation from a most generous heart, but to drink abundantly from the rich man's great river. I desired the treasure of wisdom, but I received less than I wished; though it should not be called “less” but a gift, which Augustine, oracle of the law, has conferred: consecrator of justice, restorer of spiritual glory, dispenser of eternal salvation. The world knows you as well as it marks you, and you are as known to it as you are approved. So I wish to be fed with the flowers of wisdom and watered with draughts of the living fountain. Grant the one who desires it what will benefit us both. For the native covering of a half-bare oak can grow green if it is privileged to be increased gradually by your streams. So I promise my humble presence, not so much by pen as by prayer, if I may reread Your Reverence's writings instead of seeing you. May divine clemency keep you for countless years, venerable lord. Why has the fountain of the world flowed to me in a small speech? Did it hope that hearts were less fit for its streams? Since every mind lies open to its waters and looks to the eloquent help of religion, it gives welcome showers to the senses, which full faith awaits, hanging from the tree of Christ.

### Translation notes

- Letter of Audax to Augustine. The style is ornate and some phrases are obscure (e.g. “the native covering of a half-bare oak”); translated closely.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 260.1 (CSEL 57:616–617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-260-1).

## Letter 261.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-1
- Source: CSEL 57:617–618
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Audax that he lacks leisure for long letters and is himself a beggar at the treasure of wisdom.

### Latin text

Breuem epistulam tuam sed plane uehementem flagitatricem prolixae epistulae meae non inuitus immo etiam laetus accepi, non quod facile sufficerem auiditati, sed quod gratularer caritati tuae, quia, etsi non de idoneo expetis, bonum est tamen, quod expetis. et ad longam quidem epistolam conscribendam magis mihi otium quam facultas defit occupatissimo scilicet ecclesiasticis curis, a quibus pauculae temporum stillae uix recreant uel cogitantem aliquid uel ea, quae magis urgent et mihi uidentur pluribus profutura, dictantem uel reficientem corporis uires nostrae necessarias seruituti. nam uerba non desunt, quibus possit multa charta compleri: sed quod a nobis in eadem sermonis prolixitate desideras. ad hoc me idoneum non esse respondeo. thesaurum enim sapientiae te desiderasse dixisti, sed minus accepisse quam uoluisti, cum ego ex illo thesauro mendicabunda prece cotidianam stipem rogem uixque impetrem.

### English translation (Claude)

I received your brief letter, but plainly a vehement demander of a long letter from me, not unwillingly but even gladly, not because I could easily satisfy your eagerness, but because I congratulated your charity, since, even if you ask it of one who is not fit, what you ask is good. And for writing a long letter I lack leisure more than ability, being very busy with church cares, from which a few little drops of time barely refresh me, whether in thinking something out, or in dictating things that are more pressing and seem to me likely to profit more people, or in restoring the bodily strength necessary for our service. For words are not lacking with which much paper could be filled; but what you desire from us in that same length of speech, I answer that I am not fit for. For you said you desired the treasure of wisdom but received less than you wished, whereas I beg a daily alms from that treasure with a beggar's prayer and barely obtain it.

### Translation notes

- To Audax.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 261.1 (CSEL 57:617–618; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-1).

## Letter 261.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-2
- Source: CSEL 57:618–619
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine rejects Audax's titles for him except “dispenser of salvation,” noting that salvation is dispensed through good and bad ministers alike.

### Latin text

Oraculum autem legis quo modo sum, de cuius latis atque abditis penetralibus nescio longe plura, quam scio. eiusque multiplices sinus opacosque secessus adire ac penetrare non ualeo, sicut uolo, et me non aliud quam minus dignum esse cognosco? porro sacrator iustitiae quis ego. cui me sacratum esse permagnum est? iam uero quod instauratorem spiritalis gloriae me appellas, — da ueniam — multum. cui loquaris, ignoras; ipse quippe adhuc in hac gloria sic instauror, ut de die in diem, non solum quantum accedam, sed utrum omnino aliquid accedam, latere me fatear. dispensator plane salutis aeternae cum ceteris innumerabilibus conseruis meis sum. quod si uolens facio, mercedem habeo. si autem inuitus, tantum dispensatio mihi credita est; neque enim esse salutis illius dispensatorem per uerbum et sacramentum iam hoc est etiam esse participem. nam si per bonos non dispensaretur. non recte apostolus diceret: Imitatores mei estote sicut et ego Christi. rursus si per malos non dispensaretur: non de quibusdam dominus diceret: Quae dicunt, facite. quae autem faciunt, facere nolite; dicunt enim et non faciunt. multi ergo dispensatores sunt. per quorum ministerium peruenitur ad aeternam salutem; sed quaeritur inter dispensatores, ut fidelis quis inueniatur, et inter ipsos fideles, in quorum me numero ille, qui non fallitur, computet, alius est sic alius autem sic, sicut unicuique deus partitus est mensuram fidei.

### English translation (Claude)

And how am I an oracle of the law, of whose broad and hidden inner places I do not know far more than I know, and whose many recesses and shady retreats I cannot approach and penetrate as I wish, and know myself to be nothing but less worthy? Further, who am I to be a consecrator of justice, when it is a very great thing for me to be consecrated? And as for calling me a restorer of spiritual glory (pardon me), you very much do not know to whom you are speaking; for I myself am still being so restored in this glory that I confess it is hidden from me from day to day, not only how much I advance, but whether I advance at all. A dispenser of eternal salvation I plainly am, together with countless other fellow servants of mine. “If I do it willingly, I have a reward; but if unwillingly, a stewardship has nonetheless been entrusted to me.” For to be a dispenser of that salvation through word and sacrament is not yet to be a sharer in it. For if it were not dispensed through good men, the apostle would not rightly say, “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.” Again, if it were not dispensed through bad men, the Lord would not say of some, “Do what they say, but do not do what they do; for they say and do not do.” So there are many dispensers through whose ministry eternal salvation is reached; but “it is required among dispensers that one be found faithful,” and among the faithful themselves, in whose number may he who is not deceived count me, “one has this gift, another that,” as God has apportioned to each the measure of faith.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 9:17: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:1: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:3: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 4:2: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- Rom 12:3: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 9:17; 1 Cor 11:1; Matt 23:3; 1 Cor 4:2; 1 Cor 7:7; Rom 12:3.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 261.2 (CSEL 57:618–619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-2).

## Letter 261.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-3
- Source: CSEL 57:619
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine directs Audax to his longer works and invites him to visit.

### Latin text

Itaque te. frater carissime atque dulcissime, pascat potius dominus sapientiae floribus et uiui fontis haustibus inriget. si quid autem per operulam meam religiosissimo studio tuo conferri posse arbitraris, quia et capacem te esse intellego et auidum sentio, magis in alia nostra opuscula, quae multis uoluminibus comprehenduntur, tibi animus intendendus est, quam per epistulas aliquid sperandum, quod tuum desiderium possit explere. aut certe in praesentia sume, quod potero, quam te puto tuam nobis ideo non exhibere, quia non uis; quid enim magnum est adiuuante domino, ut homo liber a cuiusquam loci munere uenias ad nos siue nobiscum diu futurus siue peracto saltem pauxillo temporis rediturus?

### English translation (Claude)

So may the Lord rather feed you, dearest and sweetest brother, with the flowers of wisdom and water you with draughts of the living fountain. But if you think anything can be contributed to your most devout zeal through my little work, since I perceive that you are capable and feel that you are eager, you should rather turn your mind to our other works, which are contained in many volumes, than hope for anything through letters that could satisfy your desire. Or at least take what I can give in person, which I think you do not afford us only because you do not wish to; for what great thing is it, with the Lord's help, for you, a man free from duty to any place, to come to us, whether to be with us for a long time or to return after at least a little time?

### Translation notes

- The phrase quam te puto … exhibere is defective in the digital text (presumably praesentiam); translated by sense.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 261.3 (CSEL 57:619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-3).

## Letter 261.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-4
- Source: CSEL 57:619–620
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes playfully that the last line of Audax's poem has seven feet.

### Latin text

Ecce paene factum est, quod in quinque uersuum tuorum tertio posuisti, ut magis loquacem quam eloquentem haberes epistulam meam. quod autem in quinto atque ultimo uersu septem pedes sunt, utrum numerus tuum fefellit auditum, an experiri uoluisti, utrum ego adhuc ista diiudicare meminerim, quae forte iam obliti sunt, qui talium aliquando studiosi postea plurimum in ecclesiasticis litteris profecerunt?

### English translation (Claude)

See, it has almost come about, as you put it in the third of your five verses, that you have a letter of mine more talkative than eloquent. But as for there being seven feet in the fifth and last verse, did the count deceive your ear, or did you want to test whether I still remember how to judge these things, which perhaps those have forgotten who were once devoted to such things and afterwards advanced greatly in church literature?

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 261.4 (CSEL 57:619–620; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-4).

## Letter 261.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-5
- Source: CSEL 57:620–621
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says he does not have Jerome's Psalter from the Hebrew, and that he only corrected Latin Psalter manuscripts from the Greek.

### Latin text

Psalterium a sancto Hieronymo translatum ex Hebraeo non habeo. nos autem non interpretati sumus, sed codicum Latinorum nonnullas mendositates ex Graecis exemplaribus emendauimus. unde fortassis fecerimus aliquid commodius, quam erat, non tamen tale, quale esse debebat. nam etiam nunc, quae forte nos tunc praeterierunt, si legentes mouerint, conlatis codicibus emendamus. ita illud, quod perfectum est. tecum nos quoque requirimus.

### English translation (Claude)

I do not have the Psalter translated by holy Jerome from the Hebrew. We, however, did not translate, but corrected some errors of the Latin manuscripts from the Greek copies. So perhaps we made something more suitable than it was, but not such as it ought to be. For even now, if things that perhaps escaped us then strike readers, we correct them by comparing manuscripts. So we too, with you, are still looking for what is perfect.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 261.5 (CSEL 57:620–621; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-261-5).

## Letter 262.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-1
- Source: CSEL 57:621–622
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Ecdicia that her husband, who had vowed continence with her, has fallen into adultery because she failed to treat him with conjugal obedience.

### Latin text

Lectis litteris reuerentiae tuae et earum perlatore interrogato. quae interroganda restabant, uehementer dolui sic te uoluisse agere cum marito, ut aedificium continentiae, quod in eo iam construi coeperat, amissa perseuerantia in adulterii ruinam miserabiliter laberetur. cum enim lugendus esset, si post continentiam uotam deo iamque actu ipso moribusque susceptam reuerteretur ad coniugis carnem, quanto magis nunc demersus in interitum profundiorem lugendus est, qui tam abrupta dissolutione moechatur iratus tibi perniciosus sibi, tamquam in te acerbius saeuiat, si ipse pereat! hoc autem tantum mali accidit. dum tu eius animum non, qua debuisti, moderatione tractasti, quia, etsi carnali consortio iam ei consensu uobis non miscebamini, in ceteris tamen rebus coniugali obsequio uiro tuo mulier seruire debuisti, praesertim cum ambo essetis membra corporis Christi. et utique, si maritum infidelem fidelis habuisses, agere te conuersatione subdita oportuit. ut eum domino lucrareris, sicut apostoli monuerunt.

### English translation (Claude)

Having read Your Reverence's letter and questioned its bearer about what remained to be asked, I grieved greatly that you chose to deal with your husband in such a way that the building of continence, which had already begun to be raised in him, has lost its perseverance and slid wretchedly into the ruin of adultery. For if he would have been mourned had he returned to his wife's flesh after continence vowed to God and already taken up in practice and habit, how much more is he now to be mourned, plunged into a deeper destruction, committing adultery with such abrupt abandon, angry with you and ruinous to himself, as if he raged more bitterly against you by perishing himself! This great evil happened because you did not handle his mind with the moderation you should have. For although by consent you were no longer united in fleshly intercourse, yet in other things you, as a woman, ought to have served your husband with conjugal obedience, especially since you were both members of the body of Christ. And surely, if you, a believer, had had an unbelieving husband, you ought to have lived in submission so as to win him for the Lord, as the apostles advised.

### Scripture references

- 1 Pet 3:1: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Ecdicia, a married woman who had taken a vow of continence with her husband. Allusions: 1 Pet 3:1; 1 Cor 7:12–16. Augustine's counsel on wifely submission is translated as written.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.1 (CSEL 57:621–622; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-1).

## Letter 262.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-2
- Source: CSEL 57:622–623
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes that Ecdicia wrongly took up continence before her husband agreed, contrary to Paul's teaching on the marital debt in 1 Cor 7.

### Latin text

Omitto enim, quod ipsam continentiam illo nondum uolente non secundum sanam doctrinam te suscepisse cognoui. neque enim corporis tui debito fraudandus fuit, priusquam ad illud bonum, quod superat pudicitiam coniugalem, tuae uoluntati uoluntas quoque eius accederet, nisi forte non legeras nec audieras uel non adtenderas apostolum dicentem: Bonum est homini mulierem non tangere; propter fornicationes autem unusquisque suam uxorem habeat et unaquaeque suum uirum habeat. uxori uir debitum reddat, similiter autem et uxor uiro. uxor non habet potestatem corporis sui sed uir; similiter autem et uir non habet potestatem corporis sui sed mulier. nolite fraudare inuicem nisi ex consensu ad tempus, ut uacetis orationi, et iterum ad id ipsum estote, ne uos temptet Satanas propter incontinentiam uestram. secundum haec uerba apostolica. etiam si se ipse continere uoluisset et tu noluisses, debitum tibi reddere cogeretur et illi deus inputaret continentiam, si non suae sed tuae cedens infirmitati, ne in adulterii damnabile flagitium caderes, maritalem tibi concubitum non negaret; quanto magis te, quam magis subiectam esse decuerat, ne ipse quoque in adulterium diabolica temptatione traheretur. in reddendo huius modi debito uoluntati eius obtemperare conuenerat, cum tibi uoluntatem continendi acceptaret deus, quia propterea non faceres, ne periret maritus!

### English translation (Claude)

I pass over the fact that I learned you took up this continence when he did not yet wish it, which was not according to sound doctrine. For he ought not to have been defrauded of the debt of your body before his will too joined yours toward that good which surpasses conjugal chastity; unless perhaps you had not read or heard, or had not paid attention to, the apostle saying: “It is good for a man not to touch a woman; but because of sexual immorality let each man have his own wife and each woman have her own husband. Let the husband render to the wife her due, and likewise the wife to the husband. The wife does not have power over her own body, but the husband; and likewise the husband does not have power over his own body, but the wife. Do not defraud one another, except by consent for a time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again, lest Satan tempt you because of your lack of self-control.” According to these apostolic words, even if he had wished to be continent and you had not, he would be obliged to render you the debt, and God would credit him with continence if, yielding not to his own weakness but to yours, he did not deny you marital intercourse, lest you fall into the damnable crime of adultery. How much more fitting was it for you, for whom it was more fitting to be subject, to comply with his will in rendering this kind of debt, so that he too might not be drawn into adultery by the devil's temptation, since God would have accepted your will to be continent, because you refrained from it so that your husband might not perish!

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:1–5: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Cor 7:1–5.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.2 (CSEL 57:622–623; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-2).

## Letter 262.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-3
- Source: CSEL 57:623–624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that since her husband later agreed to continence, Ecdicia should persevere in their joint vow even though he has fallen away.

### Latin text

Sed hoc, ut dixi, omitto, quoniam postea tibi nolenti sibi ad reddenda coniugalia debita consentire ad eadem continentiae pacta ipse consensit et tecum continentissime diu uixit suoque consensu a peccato illo, quo ei debitum carnis negabas, ipse te absoluit. non ergo iam in tua causa ista uertitur quaestio, utrum redire debeas ad concubitum uiri. quod enim deo pari consensu ambo uoueratis, perseueranter usque in finem reddere ambo debuistis. a quo proposito si lapsus est ille, tu saltem constantissime perseuera. quod te non exhortarer, nisi quia tibi ad hoc ipse consenserat. nam si numquam tenuisses eius adsensum, numerus te nullus defendisset annorum, sed post quantum libet tempus me consuluisses, nihil tibi aliud responderem. nisi quod ait apostolus: Uxor non habet potestatem corporis sui sed uir. de qua potestate sic tibi iam permiserat continentiam, ut eam tecum et ipse susciperet.

### English translation (Claude)

But this, as I said, I pass over, since afterwards, when you were unwilling to consent to render him the conjugal debt, he himself consented to the same pact of continence and lived with you most continently for a long time, and by his consent he himself absolved you of that sin by which you denied him the debt of the flesh. So the question in your case is no longer whether you ought to return to intercourse with your husband. For what you had both vowed to God with equal consent, you both ought to have rendered perseveringly to the end. If he has fallen from that purpose, you at least persevere most steadfastly. I would not exhort you to this unless he had consented to it. For if you had never had his assent, no number of years would have defended you; but after however long a time you had consulted me, I would answer you nothing other than what the apostle says: “The wife does not have power over her own body, but the husband.” By that power he had already permitted you continence in such a way that he too took it up with you.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:4: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Cor 7:4.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.3 (CSEL 57:623–624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-3).

## Letter 262.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-4
- Source: CSEL 57:624
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says that continence did not end their marriage, so Ecdicia should have done nothing with her property without her husband's consent.

### Latin text

Sed illud est, quod minus te obseruasse contristor, quia tanto humilius et oboedientius ei obsequi in domestica conuersatione debuisti, quanto ille religiosius tibi rem tam magnam etiam imitando concesserat. non enim. quia pariter temperabatis a commixtione carnali, ideo tuus maritus esse destiterat; immo uero tanto sanctius inter uos coniuges manebatis, quanto sanctiora concorditer placita seruabatis. nihil ergo de tua ueste, nihil de auro uel argento uel quacumque pecunia, rebus ullis terrenis tuis sine arbitrio eius facere debuisti, ne scandalizares hominem, qui deo tecum maiora uouerat et ab eo, quod de tua carne licita potestate posset exigere, se continenter abstinuerat.

### English translation (Claude)

But what grieves me is that you did not observe this: that you ought to have served him in domestic life the more humbly and obediently, the more devoutly he had granted you so great a thing, even by imitating you. For he had not ceased to be your husband because you both abstained from fleshly union; on the contrary, you remained spouses to each other the more holily, the holier the agreements you kept in harmony. You ought, then, to have done nothing with your clothing, nothing with gold or silver or any money or any earthly possessions of yours without his consent, so as not to scandalize a man who had vowed greater things to God with you and had continently abstained from what he could have demanded of your flesh by lawful right.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.4 (CSEL 57:624; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-4).

## Letter 262.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-5
- Source: CSEL 57:624–625
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine relates that the husband abandoned continence in anger after Ecdicia gave away almost all her property to two wandering monks without his knowledge.

### Latin text

Denique factum est, ut uinculum continentiae. quo se dilectus innexuerat, contemptus abrumperet et iratus tibi non parceret sibi. sicut enim mihi rettulit perlator epistulae tuae, cum cognouisset, quod omnia uel paene omnia. quae habebas, nescio quibus duobus transeuntibus monachis tamquam pauperibus eroganda donaueris, tunc ille detestans eos tecum et non dei seruos sed domus alienae penetratores et tuos captiuatores et depraedatores putans tam sanctam sarcinam, quam tecum subierat, indignatus abiecit. infirmus enim erat et ideo tibi. quae in communi proposito fortior uidebaris, non erat praesumptione turbandus sed dilectione portandus, quia, etiamsi ad ipsas elemosynas largius faciendas forte pigrius mouebatur. posset et ista condiscere, si tuis inopinatis non feriretur expensis, sed expectatis inuitaretur obsequiis. ut etiam hoc, quod temere sola fecisti, multo consultius dilectione concordi multoque ordinatius et honestius ambo faceretis nec blasphemarentur serui dei. si tamen hoc fuerunt, qui marito absente atque nesciente ab ignota muliere et aliena uxore tanta sumpserunt. et laudaretur deus in operibus uestris, quorum esset tam fida societas, ut a uobis communiter teneretur non solum summa castitas uerum etiam gloriosa paupertas.

### English translation (Claude)

In the end it happened that the bond of continence, in which he had bound himself while loved, he broke when despised, and, angry with you, did not spare himself. For, as the bearer of your letter told me, when he learned that you had given all or almost all you had to two passing monks or other, to be distributed as to the poor, then, detesting them together with you, and thinking them not servants of God but intruders into another's house and your captors and plunderers, he indignantly threw off the holy burden he had taken up with you. For he was weak, and therefore, by you who seemed stronger in your common purpose, he should not have been upset by presumption but carried by love; because, even if he was perhaps slow to be moved to give alms more generously, he could have learned this too if he had not been struck by your unexpected expenditures but invited by awaited acts of deference; so that what you did rashly alone, you might both have done much more prudently in harmonious love, and much more orderly and honorably, and the servants of God would not be blasphemed, if indeed they were such, who took so much from an unknown woman and another man's wife in her husband's absence and without his knowledge; and God would be praised in your works, whose partnership would be so faithful that you held in common not only the highest chastity but also a glorious poverty.

### Scripture references

- Rom 15:1: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Tim 6:1: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Rom 15:1; 1 Tim 6:1.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.5 (CSEL 57:624–625; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-5).

## Letter 262.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-6
- Source: CSEL 57:625–626
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Ecdicia that losing her husband's soul outweighs the good of her alms, since rescuing a man from the devil is the greater mercy.

### Latin text

Nunc autem inconsiderata festinatione adtende quid feceris. ut enim de illis monachis, a quibus te ipse non aedificatam sed spoliatam esse conqueritur, ego bene sentiam nec homini prae ira turbatum oculum habenti contra dei fortasse famulos facile consentiam. numquid tantum bonum est, quod pauperum carnem largioribus elemosynis refecisti, quantum malum est, quod uiri tui mentem a tam bono proposito subruisti? an cuiusquam tibi temporalis salus carior esse debuerat quam huius aeterna? nonne, si ampliorem misericordiam cogitans ideo pauperibus res tuas erogare differres. ne scandalizatus maritus tuus deo periret, uberiores tibi deus elemosynas inputaret? proinde, si recolis. quid adquisiueras, quando lucrata fueras uirum tuum, ut tecum Christo sanctiore castitate seruiret, intellege, per illas elemosynas tuas. quibus cor eius euersum est, quanto grauiore damno percussa fueris, quam sunt illa lucra, quae caelestia cogitabas. si enim habet ibi magnum locum panis fractus esurienti, quantum locum ibi credenda est habere misericordia, qua homo eripitur diabolo tamquam leoni rugienti et. quem deuoret. inquirenti!

### English translation (Claude)

But now consider what you have done by your thoughtless haste. For even if I think well of those monks, by whom he complains you were not edified but despoiled, and do not readily agree with a man whose eye is troubled by anger against those who are perhaps God's servants, is it so great a good that you refreshed the flesh of the poor with more generous alms as it is an evil that you undermined your husband's mind from so good a purpose? Or ought anyone's temporal welfare to have been dearer to you than his eternal welfare? If, thinking of a greater mercy, you had put off giving your goods to the poor so that your husband might not be scandalized and perish to God, would God not have credited you with richer alms? So, if you remember what you had gained when you had won your husband to serve Christ with you in a holier chastity, understand by how much heavier a loss you have been struck through those alms of yours, by which his heart was overturned, than are those gains you thought of as heavenly. For if bread broken for the hungry has a great place there, how great a place must we believe that mercy has there by which a man is snatched from the devil, like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour!

### Scripture references

- Isa 58:7: allusion, medium confidence
- 1 Pet 5:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Ps 6:7 (LXX 6:8); Isa 58:7; 1 Pet 5:8; 1 Cor 7:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.6 (CSEL 57:625–626; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-6).

## Letter 262.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-7
- Source: CSEL 57:626–627
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that a wife may not dispose of her goods as she pleases, since she belongs to her husband, citing 1 Pet 3:5–6.

### Latin text

Neque hoc ita dicimus. ut, si quisquam scandalizatus fuerit de bonis operibus nostris, ab eis desistendum putemus; sed alia causa est alienarum alia necessariarum in societate aliqua personarum, alia fidelis alia infidelis: alia parentum erga filios alia filiorum erga parentes. alia postremo ea, quae in his rebus uel maxime intuenda est, uiri et uxoris, ubi mulierem coniugatam non licet dicere: Facio, quod uolo, de meo, cum et ipsa non sit sua sed capitis sui, hoc est uiri sui. nam sic quaedam, ut commemorat apostolus Petrus, mulieres sanctae, quae in deum sperabant, ornabant se subiectae suis uiris. sicut Sarra obsequebatur Abrahae dominum eum uocans, cuius. inquit, factae estis filiae. cum ad Christianas, non ad Iudaeas feminas loqueretur.

### English translation (Claude)

Nor do we say this as if we thought that we should desist from our good works if anyone is scandalized by them; but the case of strangers is one thing, that of persons necessarily joined in some partnership another; that of a believer one thing, of an unbeliever another; that of parents toward children one thing, of children toward parents another; and finally, the one most to be considered in these matters, that of husband and wife, where a married woman may not say, “I do what I want with what is mine,” since she herself is not her own but her head's, that is, her husband's. For thus, as the apostle Peter recalls, certain holy women who hoped in God adorned themselves, being subject to their husbands, as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, “whose daughters,” he says, “you have become,” speaking to Christian, not Jewish, women.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 11:3: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:5–6: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 7:4; 1 Cor 11:3; Eph 5:23; 1 Pet 3:5–6.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.7 (CSEL 57:626–627; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-7).

## Letter 262.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-8
- Source: CSEL 57:627–628
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the husband rightly wished to provide for their son, and that Ecdicia should have planned almsgiving together with him and deferred to his authority.

### Latin text

Quid autem mirum, si pater communem filium nolebat huius uitae sustentaculis a matre nudari ignorans, quid sectaturus esset, cum in aetate grandiuscula esse coepisset, utrum monachi professionem an ecclesiasticum ministerium an coniugalis necessitudinis uinculum? quamuis enim ad meliora excitandi et erudiendi sint filii sanctorum, unusquisque tamen proprium donum habet adeo alius sic alius autem sic, nisi forte talia prospiciens et praecauens reprehendendus est pater, cum beatus apostolus dicat: Quisquis autem suis et maxime domesticis non prouidet, fidem denegat et est infideli deterior. cum uero de faciendis ipsis elemosynis loqueretur, ait: Non ut aliis refectio, uobis autem angustia. pariter ergo consilium de omnibus haberetis, pariter moderaremini, quid thesaurizandum esset in caelo, quid ad uitae huius sufficientiam uobis et uestris uestroque filio relinquendum, ne aliis esset refectio. uobis autem angustia. et in his disponendis atque faciendis si quid tibi forte melius uideretur, suggereres uiro reuerenter eiusdemque auctoritatem tamquam tui capitis sequereris oboedienter. ut omnes, qui sanum sapiunt, ad quos posset hoc bonum uestrum fama perferre, de domus uestrae fructu ac pace gauderent et aduersarius reuereretur nihil habens de uobis dicere praui.

### English translation (Claude)

And what wonder if the father did not want their common son stripped by his mother of the supports of this life, not knowing what he would follow when he reached an older age, whether the monastic profession or the church's ministry or the bond of marriage? For although the children of the saints are to be stirred up and taught toward better things, yet each has his own gift, one this, another that; unless perhaps a father is to be blamed for foreseeing and providing for such things, when the blessed apostle says: “But whoever does not provide for his own, and especially for his household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” And when he was speaking of giving alms itself, he said: “Not that others should have relief and you hardship.” So you should have taken counsel together about everything, and decided together what was to be stored up in heaven and what was to be left for the sufficiency of this life for yourselves and your household and your son, so that others might not have relief and you hardship. And in arranging and doing these things, if something perhaps seemed better to you, you should have suggested it reverently to your husband and followed his authority obediently as your head; so that all of sound mind to whom report of this good of yours could come might rejoice in the fruit and peace of your house, and the adversary might stand in awe, having nothing evil to say of you.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 7:7: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Tim 5:8: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 8:13: quotation, high confidence
- Titus 2:8: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Cor 7:7; 1 Tim 5:8; 2 Cor 8:13. Allusion: Titus 2:8.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.8 (CSEL 57:627–628; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-8).

## Letter 262.9

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-9
- Source: CSEL 57:628–629
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Ecdicia should not have adopted widow's dress against her husband's will, since matronly dress is compatible with religious life.

### Latin text

Porro si de faciendis elemosynis et in pauperes inpendendis rebus tuis, de quo bono opere et magno tam euidentia praecepta sunt domini. cum uiro tuo fideli et tecum sancta continentiae pacta seruante consilium communicare deberes eiusdemque non spernere uoluntatem, quanto magis de habitu atque uestitu nihil tibi praeter eius arbitrium mutandum uel usurpandum fuit, unde nihil diuinitus legimus imperatum! scriptum est quidem mulieres esse debere in habitu ordinato aurique circumpositio et intortio crinium et cetera huius modi, quae uel ad inanem pompam uel ad inlecebram formae adhiberi solent. merito reprehensa sunt. sed est quidam pro modulo personae habitus matronalis a uiduali ueste distinctus, qui potest fidelibus coniugatis salua religionis obseruantia conuenire. hunc te maritus si deponere noluit, ne te uelut uiduam illo uiuente iactares, puto, quia non fuerat in hac re usque ad dissensionis scandalum perducendus magis inoboedientiae malo quam ullius abstinentiae bono. quid est enim absurdius quam mulierem de humili ueste uiro superbire, cui te potius expediret obtemperare candidis moribus quam nigellis uestibus repugnare, quia. etsi te indumentum monachae delectabat, etiam hoc gratius posset marito obseruato exoratoque sumi quam illo inconsulto contemptoque praesumi? quod si omnino non sineret. quid tuo proposito deperiret? absit, ut hinc displiceres deo. quod coniuge tuo nondum defuncto non induereris sicut Anna sed sicut Susanna.

### English translation (Claude)

Further, if about giving alms and spending your goods on the poor, a good and great work about which the Lord's commands are so clear, you ought to have shared counsel with your husband, a believer and keeping the holy pact of continence with you, and not to have spurned his will, how much more ought you to have changed or assumed nothing in your dress and clothing without his consent, about which we read nothing divinely commanded! It is indeed written that women should be in seemly dress, and the putting on of gold and braiding of hair and other such things, which are usually used either for empty display or for the allurement of beauty, are rightly censured. But there is a certain matron's dress, in keeping with one's station, distinct from widow's clothing, which can befit married believers while religious observance is kept. If your husband did not want you to lay this aside, lest you parade yourself as a widow while he was alive, I think he should not have been driven in this matter to the scandal of dissension, by the evil of disobedience rather than by the good of any abstinence. For what is more absurd than for a woman to be proud toward her husband over humble dress, when it would be better for you to obey him with shining conduct than to resist him with dark clothes? For even if the dress of a nun delighted you, it could have been taken up more pleasingly after your husband had been respected and entreated than presumed upon without consulting him and in contempt of him. And if he did not permit it at all, what would your purpose have lost? Far be it that you should displease God because, while your husband was not yet dead, you were clothed not like Anna but like Susanna.

### Scripture references

- 1 Tim 2:9: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Pet 3:3: allusion, medium confidence
- Luke 2:36–37: allusion, medium confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sus (Susanna): allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: 1 Tim 2:9 (Old Latin “in seemly dress”); 1 Pet 3:3. Anna: the widow of Luke 2:36–37; Susanna: the married woman of the Greek additions to Daniel.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.9 (CSEL 57:628–629; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-9).

## Letter 262.10

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-10
- Source: CSEL 57:629–630
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine cites Esther, who kept a humble heart under royal attire while submitting to a pagan husband, as an example for Ecdicia.

### Latin text

Neque enim et ille, qui tecum iam coeperat custodire tam magnum continentiae bonum, etiamsi coniugale non uiduale uoluisset ut acciperes indumentum, ad indecentem quoque te compulisset ornatum, quo etsi aliqua dura condicione cogereris. posses habere in superbo cultu cor humile. nempe apud patres Esther illa regina deum timens, deum colens, deo subdita marito regi alienigenae non eundem secum colenti deum tamen subiecta seruiebat. quae cum extremo periculo non suo tantum sed etiam gentis suae, qui tunc erat populus dei, domino prosterneretur orando. in ipsa oratione sua dixit ita sibi esse ornatum regium sicut pannum menstrualem; et ita orantem confestim exaudiuit, qui cordis inspector eam uerum dicere sciuit. et utique maritum habebat multarum mulierum uirum et deorum alienorum falsorumque cultorem. tu autem. si et ille in proposito. quod tecum susceperat, perduraret nec a te offensus in flagitium corruisset. maritum habebas non solum fidelem et uerum deum tecum colentem sed etiam continentem, qui procul dubio propositi uestri non inmemor, etsi te ad coniugalia cogeret indumenta, ad superba tamen ornamenta non cogeret.

### English translation (Claude)

For he too, who had already begun to keep so great a good of continence with you, even if he had wanted you to wear a married woman's and not a widow's dress, would not have compelled you to unseemly adornment either; and even if you were forced to it by some harsh condition, you could have a humble heart in proud attire. Indeed, among the fathers, that Queen Esther, fearing God, worshiping God, subject to God, served in submission her husband, a foreign king who did not worship the same God with her. When, in extreme danger not only to herself but also to her nation, which was then the people of God, she prostrated herself before the Lord in prayer, she said in that very prayer that her royal adornment was to her like a menstrual rag; and he who inspects the heart and knew she spoke the truth heard her at once as she prayed so. And she certainly had a husband who was the husband of many women and a worshiper of foreign and false gods. But you, if he too had persevered in the purpose he had taken up with you and had not fallen into crime when offended by you, had a husband not only a believer and worshiping the true God with you but also continent, who, surely not forgetful of your purpose, even if he made you wear married women's clothing, would not have made you wear proud ornaments.

### Extrabiblical texts

- Add Esth 14:16 (Additions to Esther): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusion: Additions to Esther C 14:16 (Greek Esther 4:17w).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.10 (CSEL 57:629–630; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-10).

## Letter 262.11

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-11
- Source: CSEL 57:630–631
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine urges Ecdicia to pray for her husband, ask his pardon, and promise obedience if he returns to continence, noting that their son is legally in the father's power.

### Latin text

Haec tibi, scripsi, quoniam me consulendum putasti, non ut tuum rectum institutum sermone meo frangerem, sed quod te inordinate et incaute agente uiri tui factum dolerem. de cuius reparatione debes uehementissime cogitare, si uere ad Christum uis pertinere. indue itaque humilitatem mentis et, ut te deus conseruet perseuerantem, noli maritum contemnere pereuntem. funde pro illo pias et assiduas orationes, sacrifica lacrimas tamquam uulnerati sanguinem cordis et scribe ad eum satisfactionem petens ueniam, quia in eum peccasti, quod praeter eius consilium et uoluntatem de rebus tuis fecisti, quod faciendum putasti, non ut te paeniteat tribuisse pauperibus sed eum boni tui operis participem et moderatorem habere noluisse. promitte de cetero in adiutorio domini, si et illum suae turpitudinis paenituerit et continentiam, quam deseruit, repetiuerit, te illi, sicut decet. in omnibus seruituram. ne forte, ut ait apostolus, det illi deus paenitentiam et resipiscat de diaboli laqueis. a quo captiuus tenetur secundum ipsius uoluntatem. filium autem uestrum. quoniam de legitimis eum et honestis nuptiis suscepisti. magis in patris quam in tua esse potestate quis nesciat? et ideo ei negari non potest. ubicumque illum esse cognouerit et iure poposcerit; ac per hoc, ut secundum tuam uoluntatem in dei possit nutriri et erudiri sapientia, necessaria illi est etiam uestra concordia.

### English translation (Claude)

I have written you this, since you thought I should be consulted, not to break your right resolve by my words, but because I grieve over what your husband has done through your disorderly and incautious conduct. You must think most earnestly about his restoration, if you truly wish to belong to Christ. Put on, then, humility of mind, and, so that God may keep you persevering, do not despise your husband as he perishes. Pour out devout and constant prayers for him, sacrifice tears as the blood of a wounded heart, and write to him making amends and asking pardon, because you sinned against him by doing with your goods what you thought should be done without his counsel and will; not that you should repent of having given to the poor, but of having been unwilling to have him as sharer and director of your good work. Promise that for the future, with the Lord's help, if he repents of his shameful conduct and takes up again the continence he deserted, you will serve him in all things, as is fitting; so that perhaps, as the apostle says, God may grant him repentance and he may come to his senses out of the devil's snares, by whom he is held captive at his will. As for your son, since you bore him in lawful and honorable marriage, who does not know that he is in his father's power rather than yours? And therefore he cannot be denied to him wherever he learns he is and rightly asks for him; and so, in order that he may be brought up and taught in the wisdom of God according to your wish, your concord too is necessary for him.

### Scripture references

- 2 Tim 2:25–26: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 2 Tim 2:25–26. On the son: Roman law placed children under paternal power (patria potestas).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 262.11 (CSEL 57:630–631; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-262-11).

## Letter 263.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-1
- Source: CSEL 57:631–632
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine accepts and wears the tunic the virgin Sapida had made for her late brother, the deacon Timothy, and urges her to seek greater consolations.

### Latin text

Accepi, quod de iustis et piis laboribus manuum tuarum me accipere uoluisti, ne te grauius contristarem, quam potius consolandam uiderem, praesertim quia hoc ipsum tuum non paruum deputasti esse solacium. si eam. quam germano tuo sancto dei ministro feceras tunicam. ego induerer, cum iam a terra morientium recedens nullis rebus corruptibilibus indigeret. feci ergo. quod desiderasti, et. qualecumque hoc existimaueris uel quantulumcumque solacium. tuo erga fratrem pectori non negaui. missam abs te tunicam accepi et. quando haec ad te scripsi, ea me uestire iam coeperam. bono animo esto; sed multo melioribus multoque maioribus consolationibus utere, ut nubilum tui cordis humana infirmitate contractum serenetur auctoritate diuina, et perseueranter ita uiue, ut cum fratre uiuas, quoniam sic mortuus est tuus frater, ut uiuat.

### English translation (Claude)

I have received what you wished me to accept from the just and devout labors of your hands, so as not to sadden you more heavily when I saw that you should rather be consoled, especially since you thought it no small comfort if I should wear the tunic you had made for your brother, a holy minister of God, now that, departing from the land of the dying, he needed no corruptible things. So I have done what you desired, and, whatever you may think this comfort, however small, I have not denied it to your heart's love for your brother. I have received the tunic you sent, and when I wrote this I had already begun to wear it. Be of good courage; but use far better and far greater consolations, so that the cloud of your heart, gathered by human weakness, may be cleared by divine authority; and live perseveringly so that you may live with your brother, since your brother died so as to live.

### Translation notes

- To Sapida, a consecrated virgin of Carthage.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 263.1 (CSEL 57:631–632; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-1).

## Letter 263.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-2
- Source: CSEL 57:632–633
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine consoles Sapida over her brother Timothy's death: their love is stored safely with Christ, and she should set her mind, as her name suggests, on things above.

### Latin text

Est quidem materies lacrimarum, quod germanum dilectorem tuum teque plurimum pro tua uita et sacrae uirginitatis professione reuerentem diaconum Carthaginensis ecclesiae non uides, sicut solebas, intrantem et exeuntem et in sui ecclesiastici officii strenuitate uersantem et honorifica illa ab eo uerba non audis, quae tuae germanitatis sanctitati morigero, pio et officioso inpendebat affectu. haec cum cogitantur et consuetudinis uiolentia requiritur. cor pungitur et tamquam sanguis cordis fletus exoritur. sed sursum sit cor et sicci erunt oculi. Neque enim, quia ista, quae tibi maeres esse subtracta, suo temporali cursu praeterierunt. ideo periit illa caritas. qua Timotheus Sapidam dilexit et diligit: manet illa seruata in thesauro suo et abscondita est cum Christo in domino. qui diligunt aurum, numquid perdunt, quando recondunt? nonne tunc de illo, quantum fieri potest, securiores fiunt, cum remotum a suis oculis loculis tutioribus seruant? itane uero terrena cupiditas munitius se habere putat, si non uideat id, quod amat, et caelestis caritas dolet, tamquam amiserit, quod in horrea superna praemiserit? Sapida quod uocaris, adtende et, quae sursum sunt, sape, ubi Christus est ad dexteram dei sedens. qui pro nobis dignatus est mori, ut uiueremus et mortui et ne mors ipsa ab homine tamquam consumptura hominem timeretur nec mortuorum quisquam, pro quibus uita mortua est. tamquam uitam perdiderit, doleretur. haec atque huius modi tua sint diuina solacia. quibus erubescat et cedat humana tristitia.

### English translation (Claude)

There is indeed cause for tears in not seeing, as you used to, your loving brother, who greatly revered you for your life and your profession of sacred virginity, a deacon of the church of Carthage, coming in and going out and busy in the vigor of his church office, and in not hearing from him those honoring words which he spent on the holiness of his sister with obliging, devout and dutiful affection. When these things are thought of and the force of habit seeks them, the heart is pierced and weeping rises like the heart's blood. But let the heart be lifted up, and the eyes will be dry. For because these things you grieve to have lost have passed in their temporal course, that love with which Timothy loved and loves Sapida has not perished: it remains kept in its treasury and is hidden with Christ in the Lord. Do those who love gold lose it when they put it away? Do they not become, as far as possible, more secure about it when they keep it out of their sight in safer coffers? Does earthly desire think it holds more securely if it does not see what it loves, and does heavenly love grieve as if it had lost what it has sent ahead into the barns above? Note that you are called Sapida, and savor the things that are above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God, who deigned to die for us so that we might live even when dead, and that death itself might not be feared by man as if it would consume man, nor any of the dead, for whom Life died, be mourned as if he had lost life. Let these and such things be your divine consolations, before which human sadness may blush and give way.

### Scripture references

- Col 3:1–3: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 6:20: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Wordplay on Sapida and sapere (“savor, be wise”). Allusions: Col 3:1–3; Matt 6:20.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 263.2 (CSEL 57:632–633; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-2).

## Letter 263.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-3
- Source: CSEL 57:633
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says Christians may grieve for the dead, as Christ wept for Lazarus, but not long or like those without hope.

### Latin text

Non quidem suscensendum est de caris mortuis dolori mortalium, sed diuturnus dolor non debet esse fidelium. si ergo contristata es, iam sit satis nec sic contristeris quem ad modum gentes. quae spem non habent. non enim contristari prohibuit apostolus. cum hoc diceret, sed sic contristari quem ad modum gentes, quae spem non habent. nam et Martha et Maria, piae sorores et fideles. resurrecturum suum fratrem Lazarum flebant, quamuis eum tunc ad hanc uitam rediturum esse nescirent; et ipse dominus eundem, quem fuerat resuscitaturus, Lazarum fleuit; nimirum, ut fleamus etiam nos eos mortuos, quos ad ueram uitam resurrecturos credimus, etsi non iussit praecepto, concessit exemplo. nec frustra scriptura dicit in libro ecclesiastico: In mortuo produc lacrimas et quasi dira perpessus incipe lamentationem: sed paulo post ait: Et consolare propter tristitiam; a tristitia enim procedit mors et tristitia cordis flectet fortitudinem.

### English translation (Claude)

Mortals are not to be blamed for grieving over dear ones who have died, but the grief of the faithful should not be long. If, then, you have been saddened, let it be enough now, and do not be saddened like the Gentiles who have no hope. For the apostle, when he said this, did not forbid being saddened, but being saddened like the Gentiles who have no hope. For Martha and Mary too, devout and faithful sisters, wept for their brother Lazarus who would rise again, although they did not know that he would then return to this life; and the Lord himself wept for that same Lazarus whom he was going to raise. Clearly, that we too may weep for those dead who we believe will rise to true life, he allowed by example, though he did not command it by precept. And not in vain does Scripture say in the book of Ecclesiasticus: “Shed tears over the dead, and begin lamentation as one who has suffered dreadfully”; but a little later it says: “And be consoled because of sadness; for from sadness comes death, and sadness of heart will bend strength.”

### Scripture references

- 1 Thess 4:13: quotation, high confidence
- John 11:35: allusion, high confidence

### Extrabiblical texts

- Sir 38:16 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence
- Sir 38:17-18 (Sirach): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 1 Thess 4:13; Sir 38:16–18 (Vulgate numbering 38:16–19). Allusion: John 11:33–35.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 263.3 (CSEL 57:633; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-3).

## Letter 263.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-4
- Source: CSEL 57:633–635
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine assures Sapida that her brother's body will rise, not a hair perishing, and that he is now clothed with immortality, a better garment than the tunic she made.

### Latin text

Frater tuus. filia, mente uiuit, carne dormit. numquid, qui dormit, non adiciet, ut resurgat? deus, qui spiritum eius iam suscepit, restituet ei corpus suum, quod non perdendum abstulit. sed reddendum distulit. nulla est igitur causa tristitiae diuturnae, quia potior est causa laetitiae sempiternae, quando quidem germani tui nec pars ipsa mortalis, quae in terra sepulta est. tibi peribit, in qua tibi praesentabatur, per quam te adloquebatur tecumque conloquebatur, ex qua promebat uocem sic tuis auribus notam, quem ad modum faciem tuis oculis offerebat, ita ut, ubicumque sonuisset. etiam non uisus soleret agnosci. haec enim uiuorum sensibus subtrahuntur, ut dolorem faciat absentia mortuorum. sed quando nec ipsa in aeternum peribunt, ubi capillus capitis non peribit. et ad tempus deposita sic recipientur, ut numquam ulterius deponantur, sed in melius demutata firmentur. profecto maior est causa gratulationis in spe inaestimabilis aeternitatis quam causa maeroris in re breuissimi temporis. hanc spem non habent gentes nescientes scripturas neque uirtutem dei, qui potest perdita reparare et uiuificare mortua et redintegrare corrupta et separata iterum iungere et corrupta atque finita deinceps sine fine seruare. haec facturum se esse promisit, qui ex his fidem fecit, quae iam promissa perfecit: haec tecum sermocinetur fides tua, quoniam non fraudabitur spes tua, etsi nunc differatur caritas tua; haec meditare, his uberius et uerius consolare. si enim, quia uestior, quoniam ille non potuit, ea ueste, quam fratri texueras, te aliquid consolatur quanto debes amplius et certius consolari, quia, cui fuerat praeparata, incorruptibili indumento nulla egens corruptione atque inmortalitate uestitur!

### English translation (Claude)

Your brother, daughter, lives in mind and sleeps in flesh. Will he who sleeps not rise again? God, who has already received his spirit, will restore to him his body, which he took away not to destroy but postponed to give back. There is no cause, then, for long sadness, since there is a stronger cause for everlasting joy; since not even the mortal part of your brother, which is buried in the earth, will perish for you, the part in which he was present to you, through which he spoke to you and conversed with you, from which he brought forth a voice as known to your ears as the face he offered to your eyes, so that wherever it sounded he was usually recognized even unseen. These things are withdrawn from the senses of the living, so that the absence of the dead causes grief. But since not even these will perish forever, where not a hair of the head will perish, and, laid down for a time, they will be received back so as never again to be laid down, but changed for the better and made firm, surely there is greater cause for rejoicing in the hope of an inestimable eternity than cause for grief in a matter of the briefest time. This hope the Gentiles do not have, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God, who can restore what was lost, give life to the dead, make whole the corrupted, join again what was separated, and keep without end what was corrupted and ended. He who has given faith in these things by fulfilling what he had already promised has promised that he will do them. Let your faith converse with you about these things, since your hope will not be cheated, even if your love is now postponed; meditate on these things, be consoled by these more richly and truly. For if it consoles you somewhat that I am clothed, since he could not be, in the garment you had woven for your brother, how much more and more surely ought you to be consoled that he for whom it had been prepared, needing nothing corruptible, is clothed with an incorruptible garment and with immortality!

### Scripture references

- Ps 41:8 (40:9 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Luke 21:18: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 22:29: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 15:53–54: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Ps 41:8 (LXX 40:9); Luke 21:18; Matt 22:29; 1 Cor 15:53–54.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 263.4 (CSEL 57:633–635; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-263-4).

## Letter 264.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-1
- Source: CSEL 57:635–636
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Maxima that heresies troubling her province were foretold and that God uses the evil of the wicked to prove and train the good.

### Latin text

Quantum nos tuum studium sanctum laetificat! tantum rursus contristat, quod per errores noxios et perniciosissimos prouinciam uestram nimium periclitari significas. sed quia ista futura praedicta sunt, mirandum non est. quod exsurgant, sed uigilandum, ne noceant. haec autem deus liberator noster exsurgere non permitteret, nisi sanctis eius etiam per huius modi temptationes erudiri expediret. comparant sibi quidem illi sua uoluntate peruersa et praesentis meritum caecitatis et futuri aeterni supplicii, si per contumaciam indociles fuerint seque, cum in hac uita sunt. corrigere atque emendare neglexerint. uerum tamen, sicut ipsi male utuntur bonis dei, qui facit solem suum oriri super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos, qui eos per patientiam suam ad paenitentiam uocat, cum thesaurizant sibi iram in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii dei, sicut ergo ipsi benignitate et patientia, id est bonis dei male utuntur. dum non corriguntur, sic contra deus etiam malis eorum bene utitur non solum ad iustitiam suam, quae his digna in fine retribuet. sed etiam ad exercitationem et prouectum sanctorum suorum, ut ex ipsa etiam malorum peruersitate boni proficiant et probentur et manifestentur, sicut apostolus ait: Oportet et haereses esse, ut probati manifesti fiant inter uos.

### English translation (Claude)

As much as your holy zeal gladdens us, so much does it sadden us that, as you indicate, your province is in great danger through harmful and most pernicious errors. But since these things were foretold to come, it is not to be wondered at that they arise, but we must watch that they do no harm. God our deliverer would not allow them to arise unless it were profitable for his saints to be trained even by temptations of this kind. Those people indeed, by their perverse will, earn for themselves both present blindness and future eternal punishment, if through obstinacy they remain unteachable and neglect to correct and amend themselves while they are in this life. Yet, just as they make bad use of the good things of God, who makes his sun rise on the good and the bad and sends rain on the just and the unjust, who calls them to repentance by his patience while they store up wrath for themselves in the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God; just as they make bad use of his kindness and patience, that is, of God's good things, while they are not corrected, so, conversely, God makes good use even of their evils, not only for his justice, which will repay them what they deserve at the end, but also for the training and progress of his saints, so that from the very perversity of the wicked the good may advance and be proved and made manifest, as the apostle says: “There must be heresies, so that those who are approved may be made manifest among you.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 5:45: allusion, high confidence
- Rom 2:4–5: allusion, high confidence
- 1 Cor 11:19: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Maxima, a devout woman, probably in Spain. Quotations and allusions: Matt 5:45; Rom 2:4–5; 1 Cor 11:19.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 264.1 (CSEL 57:635–636; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-1).

## Letter 264.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-2
- Source: CSEL 57:636–637
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says God permits the wicked to train his people, commends Maxima's grief and vigilance, and urges her to keep those around her in the right faith.

### Latin text

Nam si nullus etiam malorum bonus usus esset deo ad utilitatem electorum suorum, qui etiam de malo Iudae tantum bonum nobis praestitit. ut Christi sanguine redimeremur, poterat eos aut nasci non permittere. quos malos futuros esse praesciebat, aut in ipso eorum initio malignitatis extinguere. sed tantum eos esse permittit, quantum nouit expedire atque sufficere admonendae atque exercendae sanctae domui suae. ideo nostram de illis tristitiam consolatur, quia et ipsa tristitia, quam pro illis habemus, nos releuat, illos autem in sua peruersitate perseuerantes grauat. gaudium uero, quod percipimus, quando aliqui ex eis correcti in melius commutantur et sanctorum societati copulantur, nulli gaudio in hac uita comparari potest. propterea scriptum est: Fili, si sapiens fueris, tibi sapiens eris et proximis tuis: si autem malus euaseris, solus hauries mala, quia, cum gaudemus de fidelibus et iustis, et illis et nobis prodest bonum eorum, cum autem contristamur de infidelibus et iniquis, illis solis nocet et eorum malitia et nostra tristitia; nos autem etiam hoc plurimum adiuuat apud deum. quod pro eis misericorditer contristamur et pro ipsa tristitia congemescimus et oramus. unde, honorabilis et in Christo laudabilis famula dei, et maestitiam tuam de talibus et uigilantiam atque cautelam contra tales. quam tuis litteris expressisti, multum adprobo et laudo atque, in hac uia perseueranter ambules, pro meis uiribus. quia hoc exigis. et exhortor et moneo, ut miserearis eorum tamquam simplex ut columba, caueas autem illos tamquam astuta sicut serpens desque operam, quantum potes. ut. qui tibi adhaerent, tecum in recta fide permaneant aut ad fidem rectam, si forte in aliquo aliqui deprauati sunt, corrigantur.

### English translation (Claude)

For if God had no good use even of the wicked for the benefit of his elect, he who even from Judas's evil gave us so great a good, that we were redeemed by the blood of Christ, could either not have allowed those he foreknew would be wicked to be born, or have extinguished them at the very beginning of their malice. But he allows them to exist only as far as he knows it to be profitable and sufficient for admonishing and training his holy household. Therefore he consoles our sadness about them, since even the sadness we have for them relieves us, while it weighs on them as they persist in their perversity. But the joy we receive when some of them are corrected, changed for the better and joined to the fellowship of the saints, cannot be compared to any joy in this life. That is why it is written: “Son, if you are wise, you will be wise for yourself and your neighbors; but if you turn out evil, you alone will draw up evils”; because, when we rejoice over the faithful and the just, their good profits both them and us; but when we are saddened over the unbelieving and the wicked, both their malice and our sadness harm them alone, while this too helps us greatly before God, that we are mercifully saddened for them and, in that sadness, groan and pray. Therefore, honorable handmaid of God, praiseworthy in Christ, I greatly approve and praise both your sadness over such people and your vigilance and caution against them, which you expressed in your letter; and, as you ask, I exhort and urge you as far as I can to walk perseveringly in this way, to have pity on them as simple as a dove but to beware of them as wise as a serpent, and to strive as much as you can that those who are attached to you remain with you in the right faith or, if some are perhaps perverted in anything, be corrected to the right faith.

### Scripture references

- Prov 9:12: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 10:16: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Prov 9:12 (LXX/Old Latin form). Allusion: Matt 10:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 264.2 (CSEL 57:636–637; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-2).

## Letter 264.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-3
- Source: CSEL 57:637–638
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine confirms Maxima's faith that the Son took a complete human nature, rational soul and flesh, without sin, and asks for the heretics' writings to refute them.

### Latin text

De homine autem, quem suscepit uerbum dei, cum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis, emendarem aliquid. si in eo. quod credis. falsum aut peruersum inuenirem. hoc ergo crede. quod credis, quia in illo homine totam naturam nostram suscepit filius dei, id est et animam rationalem et carnem mortalem sine peccato. infirmitatis enim nostrae particeps factus est non iniquitatis, ut per infirmitatem communem solueret iniquitatem nostram et adduceret nos ad iustitiam suam bibens mortem de nostro et propinans uitam de suo. sed si habes aliquam scripturam eorum, in qua adserunt, quod huic fidei sit contrarium. dignare eam mittere, ut non solum fidem nostram dicamus, sed eorum quoque perfidiam, quantum possumus, refellamus. sine dubio enim hoc ipsum. quod peruerse et impie sentiunt, aliquibus testimoniis diuinarum scripturarum conantur adstruere. in quibus eis ostendendum est, quam non recte intellegant litteras sacras conscriptas ad fidelium salutem, tamquam si quisquam se medicinalibus ferramentis grauiter uexet, quae utique non ad uulnerandum sed ad sanandum sunt instituta. multum autem laborauimus et laboramus, quantum dominus donat, contra diuersos errores arguendos. sed laborum nostrorum opuscula si forte habere desideras, mitte, qui tibi describant; uoluit enim deus, ut hoc facillime possis, qui tibi dedit, unde possis.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the man whom the Word of God took up when the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, I would correct something if I found anything false or perverse in what you believe. So believe what you believe: that in that man the Son of God took up our whole nature, that is, both a rational soul and mortal flesh, without sin. For he became a sharer in our weakness, not in our iniquity, so that through the shared weakness he might undo our iniquity and lead us to his righteousness, drinking death from what is ours and offering life from what is his. But if you have any writing of theirs in which they assert something contrary to this faith, please send it, so that we may not only state our faith but also refute their unbelief as far as we can. For no doubt they try to support their perverse and impious views by some testimonies of the divine Scriptures, in which we must show them how wrongly they understand the sacred writings composed for the salvation of the faithful, as if someone were to wound himself gravely with medical instruments, which were surely made not for wounding but for healing. We have labored and labor much, as far as the Lord grants, in refuting various errors. If you perhaps wish to have the works of our labors, send people to copy them for you; for God, who has given you the means, has willed that you can do this very easily.

### Scripture references

- John 1:14: allusion, high confidence
- Heb 4:15: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: John 1:14; Heb 4:15. The error in question is probably Apollinarian or Priscillianist; uncertain.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 264.3 (CSEL 57:637–638; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/260-1/#p-264-3).

## Letter 265.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-1
- Source: CSEL 57:638–639
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine replies to Seleuciana about a Novatianist who claimed Peter was not baptized though the other apostles were.

### Latin text

Lectis litteris tuis de salute uestra laetatus ad ea, quae scripsisti, respondere non distuli. et primum miratus sum, quo modo dicat Nouatianus iste Petrum baptizatum non fuisse, cum paulo superius scripseris eum dixisse. quod apostoli fuerint baptizati. unde illi uideatur, quod inter apostolos baptizatos Petrus non fuerit baptizatus, ignoro et ideo exemplum epistulae tuae. ne forsitan tu non habeas, misi tibi, in quo diligentius consideres ad ea me respondere, quae inueni in litteris tuis: si enim notarius non mendose excepit aut scripsit, nescio. quale cor habeat. qui, cum apostolos baptizatos dicat. Petrum baptizatum negat.

### English translation (Claude)

Having read your letter and rejoiced at your welfare, I did not delay to answer what you wrote. And first I wondered how this Novatian can say that Peter was not baptized, when a little earlier you wrote that he said the apostles were baptized. Why he thinks that Peter was not baptized among the baptized apostles I do not know; and so I have sent you a copy of your letter, in case you do not have one, in which you may consider more carefully that I am answering what I found in your letter. For if the stenographer did not take it down or write it wrongly, I do not know what kind of heart a man has who says the apostles were baptized and denies that Peter was baptized.

### Translation notes

- To Seleuciana. “Novatian” here means a Novatianist.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.1 (CSEL 57:638–639; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-1).

## Letter 265.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-2
- Source: CSEL 57:639–640
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that Peter's repentance for his denial was not the formal penance of the Church's penitents.

### Latin text

Quod autem dicitur Petrus egisse paenitentiam, cauendum est, ne ita putetur egisse, quo modo agunt in ecclesia. qui proprie paenitentes uocantur. et quis hoc ferat, ut primum apostolorum inter tales paenitentes numerandum putemus? paenituit enim eum negasse Christum, quod eius indicant lacrimae; sic enim scriptum est, quia fleuit amare. nondum enim fuerant resurrectione domini confirmati et illo aduentu spiritus sancti, qui apparuit die pentecostes, uel illa inspiratione. quam demonstrauit dominus, posteaquam resurrexit a mortuis, cum sufflauit in eorum faciem dicens: Accipite spiritum sanctum.

### English translation (Claude)

As for the statement that Peter did penance, we must take care that he is not thought to have done it in the way those do it in the Church who are properly called penitents. And who could bear that we should think the first of the apostles should be numbered among such penitents? For he repented of having denied Christ, as his tears show; for it is written that he wept bitterly. For they had not yet been strengthened by the Lord's resurrection and by that coming of the Holy Spirit who appeared on the day of Pentecost, or by that inbreathing which the Lord showed after he rose from the dead, when he breathed on their faces, saying, “Receive the Holy Spirit.”

### Scripture references

- Matt 26:75: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 2:1–4: allusion, medium confidence
- John 20:22: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Allusions: Matt 26:75; Acts 2:1–4. Quotation: John 20:22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.2 (CSEL 57:639–640; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-2).

## Letter 265.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-3
- Source: CSEL 57:640–641
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine explains that the apostles had not yet received the baptism of the Spirit when Peter denied Christ, but that they had been baptized with water, as baptism is not to be despised.

### Latin text

Unde recte dici potest, quia, cum Petrus negauit dominum, nondum fuerant apostoli baptizati non tamen aqua sed spiritu sancto. hoc enim eis dixit, posteaquam resurrexit et conuersatus est cum eis: Iohannes quidem baptizauit aqua. uos autem spiritu sancto baptizabimini, quem et accepturi estis non post multos dies hos usque ad pentecosten. aliqui autem codices habent: Vos autem spiritu sancto incipietis baptizari; sed siue dicatur baptizabimini siue dicatur incipietis baptizari, ad rem nihil interest. nam in quibuscumque codicibus inueniuntur baptizabis aut incipietis baptizare, mendosi sunt, qui ex Graecis facillime conuincuntur. si autem dicimus aqua non fuisse baptizatos, metuendum est, ne grauiter in eis erremus, ne demus hominibus auctoritatem contemnendi baptismum. quem usque adeo non contemnendum ipsa apostolica disciplina commendat, ut Cornelius centurio et hi, qui cum illo erant. etiam iam accepto spiritu sancto fuerint baptizati.

### English translation (Claude)

Hence it can rightly be said that when Peter denied the Lord the apostles had not yet been baptized, not, however, with water, but with the Holy Spirit. For he said this to them after he rose and lived with them: “John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit, whom you are also going to receive not many days from now, at Pentecost.” Some manuscripts have, “but you will begin to be baptized with the Holy Spirit”; but whether “you will be baptized” or “you will begin to be baptized” is said makes no difference to the matter. For any manuscripts in which “you will baptize” or “you will begin to baptize” is found are faulty, and are very easily refuted from the Greek. But if we say they were not baptized with water, we must fear lest we err gravely about them and give men authority to despise baptism, which apostolic discipline itself commends as so far from being despised that the centurion Cornelius and those who were with him were baptized even after they had already received the Holy Spirit.

### Scripture references

- Acts 1:5: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 10:44–48: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Acts 1:5 (with an Old Latin addition “until Pentecost”); Augustine discusses variant Latin readings. Allusion: Acts 10:44–48.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.3 (CSEL 57:640–641; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-3).

## Letter 265.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-4
- Source: CSEL 57:641–642
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues that since Christ made baptism necessary, the apostles must have been baptized even though Scripture does not record it, as martyrdom alone substitutes for baptism.

### Latin text

Sicut antiqui iusti si non circumciderentur, non erat eis peccatum, postea uero quam iussit deus, ut circumcideretur Abraham eiusque posteritas, iam si non fieret, graue peccatum fuit, sic etiam, antequam dominus Christus in ecclesia sua sacramentum noui testamenti pro circumcisione carnis sanctum baptismum dedit et apertissime dixit: Si quis non renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu sancto, non intrabit in regnum caelorum. iam non debemus quaerere, quando quisque fuerit baptizatus. sed, quoscumque legimus in corpore Christi, quod est ecclesia, pertinere ad regnum caelorum, nonnisi baptizatos intellegere debemus, nisi forte quos angustia passionis inuenit et nolentes negare Christum, antequam baptizarentur, occisi sunt, quibus ipsa passio pro baptismo deputata est. sed numquid hoc possumus de apostolis dicere, qui usque adeo largum tempus habuerunt, quo baptizarentur, ut alios etiam baptizauerint? sed non omnia, quae facta sunt, etiam scripta inueniuntur; uerum tamen facta esse ex ceteris documentis probantur. scriptum est, quando baptizatus sit apostolus Paulus, et scriptum non est, quando baptizati sint alii apostoli: uerum tamen etiam ipsos baptizatos intellegere debemus, quem ad modum scriptum est, quando baptizatae sint plebes ecclesiarum in Hierusalem et in Samaria, quando autem baptizatae sint aliae plebes gentium, quibus apostoli epistulas miserunt, non est utique scriptum et tamen etiam ipsas baptizatos utique minime dubitamus propter illam domini sententiam: Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu sancto, non intrabit in regnum caelorum.

### English translation (Claude)

Just as for the righteous of old it was no sin if they were not circumcised, but after God commanded that Abraham and his descendants be circumcised, it was a grave sin if it was not done, so also, after the Lord Christ gave holy baptism in his Church as the sacrament of the New Testament in place of circumcision of the flesh, and said most plainly, “Unless one is reborn of water and the Holy Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven,” we need no longer ask when each one was baptized; but whoever we read belong to the kingdom of heaven in the body of Christ, which is the Church, we must understand only as baptized; except perhaps those whom the strait of martyrdom overtook and who, refusing to deny Christ, were killed before they were baptized, for whom that suffering itself is counted as baptism. But can we say this of the apostles, who had so much time to be baptized that they even baptized others? Not everything that was done is found written; yet it is proved to have been done from other evidence. It is written when the apostle Paul was baptized, and it is not written when the other apostles were baptized; yet we must understand that they too were baptized, just as it is written when the peoples of the churches in Jerusalem and Samaria were baptized, but it is certainly not written when the other peoples of the Gentiles, to whom the apostles sent letters, were baptized, and yet we have not the least doubt that they too were baptized, because of that saying of the Lord: “Unless one is reborn of water and the Holy Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven.”

### Scripture references

- John 3:5: quotation, high confidence
- Gen 17:10: allusion, high confidence
- Acts 9:18: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 2:41: allusion, medium confidence
- Acts 8:12: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: John 3:5 (Old Latin “kingdom of heaven”). Allusions: Gen 17:10; Acts 9:18; Acts 2:41; Acts 8:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.4 (CSEL 57:641–642; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-4).

## Letter 265.5

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-5
- Source: CSEL 57:642–644
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine argues from John 3:22, 4:1–3 and 13:10 that Christ baptized through his disciples, who must themselves have been baptized, Peter included.

### Latin text

Utrumque autem de domino scriptum est, et quia baptizabat plus quam Iohannes et quia ipse non baptizabat sed discipuli eius, ut intellegeremus et ipsum quidem baptizasse praesentia maiestatis, non tamen ipsum baptizasse manibus suis. ipsius enim erat baptismi sacramentum, ad discipulos autem baptizandi ministerium pertinebat. tunc ergo, quando dicit Iohannes euangelista in euangelio suo: Post haec exiit Iesus et discipuli eius in Iudaeam terram et illic morabatur cum eis et baptizabat, tunc paulo post de illo loquens ait: Ut ergo cognouit Iesus, quia audierunt Pharisaei, quod Iesus plures discipulos haberet et baptizaret plures quam Iohannes, quamquam Iesus ipse non baptizaret sed discipuli eius, reliquit Iudaeam terram et abiit iterum in Galilaeam, tunc ergo, quando ab Hierosolymis exiit cum discipulis suis in Iudaeam terram et illic morabatur cum eis, baptizabat non per se ipsum sed per discipulos suos, quos intellegimus iam fuisse baptizatos siue baptismo Iohannis, sicut nonnulli arbitrantur, siue. quod magis credibile est, baptismo Christi. neque enim ministerium baptizandi defugeret, ut haberet baptizatos seruos, per quos ceteros baptizaret, qui non defugit memorabilis illius humilitatis ministerium, quando eis lauit pedes et petenti Petro. ut non tantum pedes uerum etiam manus et caput ei lauaret, respondit: Qui lotus est, non indiget, nisi ut pedes lauet, sed est mundus totus. ubi intellegitur, quod iam Petrus fuerat baptizatus.

### English translation (Claude)

Both things are written of the Lord: that he baptized more than John, and that he himself did not baptize but his disciples; so that we might understand that he baptized by the presence of his majesty, yet did not baptize with his own hands. For the sacrament of baptism was his, but the ministry of baptizing belonged to the disciples. So when John the evangelist says in his Gospel, “After this Jesus and his disciples went into the land of Judea, and there he stayed with them and baptized,” and a little later, speaking of him, says, “When Jesus knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John, although Jesus himself did not baptize but his disciples, he left the land of Judea and went again into Galilee,” then, when he went out from Jerusalem with his disciples into the land of Judea and stayed there with them, he baptized not by himself but through his disciples, whom we understand to have already been baptized, whether with John's baptism, as some think, or, which is more credible, with Christ's baptism. For he who did not shrink from the ministry of that memorable humility, when he washed their feet, would not have shrunk from the ministry of baptizing, so as to have baptized servants through whom he might baptize the rest. And when Peter asked him to wash not only his feet but also his hands and head, he answered: “He who has been washed needs only to wash his feet, but is wholly clean.” Here it is understood that Peter had already been baptized.

### Scripture references

- John 3:22: quotation, high confidence
- John 4:1–3: quotation, high confidence
- John 13:10: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: John 3:22; John 4:1–3; John 13:10.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.5 (CSEL 57:642–644; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-5).

## Letter 265.6

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-6
- Source: CSEL 57:644–645
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the claim that the apostles gave penance instead of baptism, with no penance after baptism, is foreign to Catholic faith, whether or not Novatianists hold it.

### Latin text

Quo modo autem iste dicat. quod in epistula tua posuisti, quod apostoli dederint paenitentiam pro baptismo, non euidenter expressum est. si enim pro baptismo ideo dicit. quia per paenitentiam remittuntur peccata, habet aliquid rationis. quod dicit. sed talis paenitentia post baptismum potest utilis esse. si quis peccauerit. iste autem quoniam negat post baptismum dari paenitentiae locum, cum dicit, sicut scripsisti. paenitentiam solam ante baptismum esse, datur intellegi sic eum dixisse. quod apostoli dederant paenitentiam pro baptismo. ut ante baptismum eam dederint atque hi, quibus data sit. postea non fuerint baptizati, quia eis illa pro baptismo fuit, quod Nouatianos dicere numquam audiui. unde quaere diligenter, ne forte alicuius alterius erroris sit et Nouatianum se esse confingat uel putet. aut, si et hoc Nouatiani dicunt, nescio: illud tamen scio, quoniam, quisquis hoc dicit, a regula fidei catholicae et doctrina Christi et apostolorum prorsus alienus est.

### English translation (Claude)

But how this man means what you put in your letter, that the apostles gave penance in place of baptism, is not clearly expressed. For if he says “in place of baptism” because sins are forgiven through penance, what he says has some reason in it. But such penance can be useful after baptism, if someone has sinned. Yet since he denies that a place for penance is given after baptism, when he says, as you wrote, that there is penance only before baptism, it is given to be understood that he said the apostles gave penance in place of baptism in this sense: that they gave it before baptism, and those to whom it was given were not afterwards baptized, because for them it took the place of baptism. I have never heard the Novatianists say this. So inquire carefully whether perhaps he belongs to some other error and pretends or thinks himself to be a Novatianist. Or, if the Novatianists say this too, I do not know; but this I do know, that whoever says it is utterly estranged from the rule of the Catholic faith and the teaching of Christ and the apostles.

### Translation notes

- The Novatianists denied reconciliation to those who sinned gravely after baptism.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.6 (CSEL 57:644–645; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-6).

## Letter 265.7

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-7
- Source: CSEL 57:645–646
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine distinguishes penance before baptism, as in Acts 2:38, from the public penance of baptized sinners, as in 2 Cor 12:21 and the case of Simon Magus.

### Latin text

Agunt enim homines ante baptismum paenitentiam de suis prioribus peccatis ita tamen, ut etiam baptizentur, sicut scriptum est in actibus apostolorum loquente Petro ad Iudaeos et dicente: Agite paenitentiam et baptizetur unusquisque uestrum in nomine domini Iesu Christi; et dimittentur uobis peccata uestra. agunt etiam homines paenitentiam. si post baptismum ita peccauerint. ut excommunicari et postea reconciliari mereantur, sicut agunt in omnibus ecclesiis illi. qui proprie paenitentes appellantur. de tali enim paenitentia locutus est apostolus Paulus, ubi ait: Ne iterum cum uenero. humiliet me deus ad uos et lugeam multos ex his, qui ante peccauerunt et non egerunt paenitentiam super inmunditia et luxuria et fornicatione, quam egerunt; neque enim scribebat ista nisi eis, qui iam fuerant baptizati. habemus etiam in actibus apostolorum Simonem iam baptizatum, cum pecunia uellet emere, ut per inpositionem manus eius daretur spiritus sanctus, admonitum a Petro, ut de hoc graui peccato ageret paenitentiam.

### English translation (Claude)

For people do penance before baptism for their former sins, yet in such a way that they are also baptized, as it is written in the Acts of the Apostles, when Peter speaks to the Jews and says: “Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and your sins will be forgiven you.” People also do penance if after baptism they have sinned so as to deserve to be excommunicated and afterwards reconciled, as those do in all the churches who are properly called penitents. Of such penance the apostle Paul spoke, where he says: “Lest, when I come again, God humble me before you, and I mourn many of those who sinned before and did not repent of the uncleanness and licentiousness and sexual immorality they committed”; for he wrote this only to those who had already been baptized. We also have in the Acts of the Apostles Simon, already baptized, admonished by Peter, when he wished to buy with money that the Holy Spirit be given by the laying on of his hand, to repent of this grave sin.

### Scripture references

- Acts 2:38: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 12:21: quotation, high confidence
- Acts 8:18–22: allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Acts 2:38; 2 Cor 12:21. Allusion: Acts 8:18–22.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.7 (CSEL 57:645–646; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-7).

## Letter 265.8

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-8
- Source: CSEL 57:646–647
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine describes the daily penance of the faithful for small sins through the Lord's Prayer, fasting and almsgiving, comparing small sins to water seeping into a ship.

### Latin text

Est etiam paenitentia bonorum et humilium fidelium paene cotidiana, in qua pectora tundimus dicentes: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. neque enim ea nobis dimitti uolumus. quae dimissa non dubitamus in baptismo, sed illa utique, quae humanae fragilitati quamuis parua tamen crebra subrepunt. quae si collecta contra nos fuerint, ita nos grauabunt. et oppriment sicut unum aliquod grande peccatum. quid enim interest ad naufragium, utrum uno grandi fluctu nauis operiatur et obruatur, an paulatim subrepens aqua in sentinam et per neglegentiam derelicta atque contempta impleat nauem atque submergat? propter hoc ieiunia et elemosynae et orationes inuigilant. in quibus cum dicimus: Dimitte nobis, sicut et nos dimittimus. manifestamus habere nos. quod nobis dimittatur, atque in his uerbis humiliantes animas nostras cotidianam quodam modo agere paenitentiam non cessamus. ad ea, quae scripsisti, puto me breuiter sed sufficienter respondisse; superest, ut ille non sit contentiosus, propter quem lucrandum ad me tales litteras dandas putasti.

### English translation (Claude)

There is also the almost daily penance of good and humble believers, in which we beat our breasts, saying, “Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors.” For we do not want those sins forgiven us which we do not doubt were forgiven in baptism, but surely those which creep in on human frailty, small but frequent, which, if gathered together against us, will weigh us down and crush us like some one great sin. For what difference does it make for shipwreck whether a ship is covered and overwhelmed by one great wave, or whether water creeping little by little into the hold and left and disregarded through negligence fills the ship and sinks it? For this reason fasts and alms and prayers keep watch, in which, when we say, “Forgive us, as we also forgive,” we show that we have something to be forgiven, and, humbling our souls in these words, we do not cease to do a kind of daily penance. I think I have answered what you wrote briefly but sufficiently; it remains that he not be contentious, for whose winning you thought such a letter should be obtained from me.

### Scripture references

- Matt 6:12: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Matt 6:12.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 265.8 (CSEL 57:646–647; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-265-8).

## Letter 266.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-1
- Source: CSEL 57:647–648
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine writes to the young consecrated virgin Florentina, at her mother's report of her wish, inviting her to ask him whatever she wishes to know.

### Latin text

Sanctum propositum tuum et inuisceratus cordi tuo timor domini castus permanens in saeculum saeculi curam pro te nostram non solum in precibus apud deum uerum etiam in admonitionibus ad te ipsam non mediocriter suscitat. quod quidem in epistulis meis, quas ad matrem reuerentiae tuae debito mihi cum honore nominandam dedi, non semel feci. sed quia hoc mihi rescribere dignata est. prius te uelle accipere litteras meas, tum demum, si quid forte tibi opus esset ex ministerio meo, quod uenerando studio tuo omniumque talium, quantum possum, libera seruitute debere me noui, non te esse tacituram et rescribendo insinuaturam, ecce feci, quod te uoluisse quamuis non per te comperi, ne uiderer tibi ostium fiduciae inhumaniter claudere. superest, ut promas ipsa. si quid ex me quaerendum putas: aut enim scio, quod inquisieris. nec negabo aut ita nescio, ut nullo fidei salutisque detrimento nesciam et de hoc etiam te ipsam, si potuero. faciam reddita ratione securam. aut certe, si et nescio et tamen sciendum est. uel impetrabo a domino. ne tibi desim nam saepe officium impertiendi meritum est accipiendi, uel ita tibi respondebo, ut noueris, pro hac ipsa re, quam pariter nescimus; ad quem pulsare debeamus.

### English translation (Claude)

Your holy purpose and the chaste fear of the Lord, rooted in your heart and enduring forever and ever, stir up in no small way our care for you, not only in prayers to God but also in admonitions to you yourself. This I have done more than once in my letters to your mother, whom I must name with due honor. But since she deigned to write back to me that you wished first to receive a letter from me, and that then, if you needed anything from my ministry, which I know I owe as far as I can, in free service, to your venerable zeal and that of all such persons, you would not keep silent but would let me know by writing back, see, I have done what I learned you wished, though not from you, so as not to seem to shut the door of confidence on you unkindly. It remains that you yourself bring forward anything you think should be asked of me. For either I know what you will ask and will not refuse it; or I do not know it in such a way that I can be ignorant without any harm to faith and salvation, and about this too I will, if I can, make you secure by giving a reason; or certainly, if I do not know and yet it must be known, I will either obtain it from the Lord so as not to fail you (for often the duty of imparting is the merit of receiving), or I will so answer you that you may know at whose door we must knock for this very thing which we both alike do not know.

### Scripture references

- Ps 19:9 (18:10 LXX): allusion, high confidence

### Translation notes

- To Florentina, a young consecrated virgin. Allusion: Ps 19:9 (LXX 18:10).

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 266.1 (CSEL 57:647–648; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-1).

## Letter 266.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-2
- Source: CSEL 57:648–649
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Florentina he is no perfect teacher, that it is better to be taught by God, and that learning is safer for humility than teaching.

### Latin text

Haec ideo praelocutus sum, ne te pro certo speres, quicquid a me quaesieris, audituram et, cum hoc non prouenerit. audacter potius quam prudenter me fecisse arbitreris, quod tibi quaerendi, si quid uoles, facultatem dedi. hoc enim feci non doctor perfectus sed cum docendis perficiendus, domina eximia meritoque honorabilis in Christo ac suscipienda filia. equidem etiam in his rebus, quas utcumque scio, magis te cupio esse scientem quam scientiae nostrae indigentem. neque enim, ut, quod scimus, doceamus, aliorum ignorantiam optare debemus; multo quippe melius omnes sumus docibiles deo, quod utique in illa superna patria, cum in nobis completum fuerit, quod promissum est, perficietur, ut non dicat homo proximo suo: Cognosce dominum; omnes enim cognoscent eum, sicut scriptum est, a minore usque ad maiorem eorum. et sollicitissime cauendum est in docendo superbiae uitium, quod in discendo non ita est. unde et sancta scriptura nos admonet dicens: Sit omnis homo uelox ad audiendum, tardus autem ad loquendum; et ille in psalmo ait: Auditui meo dabis exultationem et laetitiam continuoque subiecit: Et exultabunt ossa humiliata. uidit enim in audiendo facillime seruari humilitatem, quae difficilis est in docendo, quoniam necesse est, ut doctor habeat superiorem locum, ubi laboriosum est obtinere, ne subrepat elatio.

### English translation (Claude)

I have said this beforehand so that you may not hope for certain to hear whatever you ask of me, and, when that does not happen, think that I acted boldly rather than prudently in giving you the opportunity to ask anything you wish. For I have done this not as a perfect teacher but as one to be perfected together with those to be taught, my excellent lady, justly honorable daughter in Christ, to be welcomed. Indeed, even in the things I know in some fashion, I would rather you knew them than needed our knowledge. For we ought not to wish for others' ignorance in order to teach what we know; for it is much better that we all be taught by God, which will surely be perfected in that heavenly fatherland when what is promised is fulfilled in us, that a man shall not say to his neighbor, “Know the Lord,” for all shall know him, as it is written, from the least to the greatest of them. And in teaching we must most carefully guard against the vice of pride, which is not so in learning. Hence holy Scripture admonishes us, saying, “Let every man be quick to hear but slow to speak”; and he says in the psalm, “To my hearing you will give exultation and gladness,” and at once adds, “and the humbled bones will exult.” For he saw that humility is very easily kept in hearing, which is difficult in teaching, since the teacher must have the higher place, where it is laborious to prevent pride from creeping in.

### Scripture references

- Jer 31:34: quotation, high confidence
- Jas 1:19: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:8 (50:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- John 6:45: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Jer 31:34 (Heb 8:11); Jas 1:19; Ps 51:8 (LXX 50:10). Allusion: John 6:45.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 266.2 (CSEL 57:648–649; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-2).

## Letter 266.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-3
- Source: CSEL 57:649–650
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine notes the danger of pride for teachers, citing Paul's thorn, Christ's warning against being called Rabbi, and John the Baptist's humility.

### Latin text

Videsne. quem ad modum periclitemur, a quibus hoc expectatur, ut non solum doctores simus, uerum etiam, cum simus homines, diuina doceamus? sed laborum periculorumque nostrorum singulare solacium est, cum ita proficitis, ut illo perueniatis, ubi nullius hominis doctoris egeatis. isto autem periculo non tantum nos — nam ad illum, de quo dicturus sum, quid sumus nos? — non ergo nos tantum isto periculo sed etiam ille doctor gentium periclitatum se esse testatur, cum dicit: Ne in magnitudine reuelationum mearum extollar, datus est mihi stimulus carnis et cetera. unde et ipse dominus, tumoris huius admirabilis medicus: Nolite, inquit, ab hominibus uocari Rabbi; unus est enim magister uester Christus, quod retinens idem ipse doctor gentium dicit: Neque qui plantat, est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus. hoc et ille meminit, qui in natis mulierum, quanto magnus erat, tanto se in omnibus humiliabat indignum se adfirmans, qui Christi calciamenta portaret. quid enim aliud ostendit, ubi ait: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amicus autem sponsi stat et audit eum et gaudio gaudet propter uocem sponsi? hic est ille auditus, de quo paulo ante commemoraui in psalmo positum: Auditui meo dabis exultationem et laetitiam et exultabunt ossa humiliata.

### English translation (Claude)

Do you see in what danger we are, from whom it is expected that we not only be teachers but, though we are men, teach divine things? But the special consolation of our labors and dangers is when you so advance that you reach the point where you need no human teacher. Not only we (for what are we compared with him of whom I am about to speak?), not only we, then, but even that teacher of the Gentiles testifies that he was in this danger, when he says: “Lest I be lifted up by the greatness of the revelations, a thorn in the flesh was given me,” and the rest. Hence the Lord himself, the wonderful physician of this swelling, says: “Do not be called Rabbi by men; for you have one teacher, Christ.” Holding to this, the same teacher of the Gentiles says: “Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth.” He too remembered this who, among those born of women, humbled himself in all things the more the greater he was, declaring himself unworthy to carry Christ's sandals. For what else did he show when he said: “He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom stands and hears him and rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom's voice”? This is that hearing which I mentioned a little before, set in the psalm: “To my hearing you will give exultation and gladness, and the humbled bones will exult.”

### Scripture references

- 2 Cor 12:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 23:8: quotation, high confidence
- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 11:11: allusion, high confidence
- Matt 3:11: allusion, high confidence
- John 3:29: quotation, high confidence
- Ps 51:8 (50:10 LXX): quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: 2 Cor 12:7; Matt 23:8, 10; 1 Cor 3:7; John 3:29; Ps 51:8 (LXX 50:10). Allusions: Matt 11:11; Matt 3:11.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 266.3 (CSEL 57:649–650; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-3).

## Letter 266.4

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-4
- Source: CSEL 57:650–651
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine invites Florentina to ask what she wishes, reminding her that God is the inner teacher who gives the growth.

### Latin text

Proinde tanto me certius, tanto solidius, tanto sanius gaudere scias de fide et spe et dilectione tua, quanto minus indigueris non tantum a me quicquam discere sed ab ullo prorsus hominum. uerum tamen, quia, cum illic essem, te quidem per aetatem uerecundante boni parentes et amantissimi bonorum studiorum tuorum, quanto pietatis ueraeque sapientiae ardore flagrares, mihi intimare dignati sunt et beniuolentissime petierunt, ne tibi instruendae, in quo opus esset, meam operulam denegarem, admonendam te his litteris credidi secundum supra dictas optiones, ut quaeras, quod uis, ne sim superfluus, si conatus fuero docere, quod scis, dum tamen firmissime teneas, quod, etsi aliquid salubriter per me scire potueris, ille te docebit, qui est interioris hominis magister interior, qui in corde tuo tibi ostendit uerum esse, quod dicitur, quia neque qui plantat, est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus.

### English translation (Claude)

Know, then, that I rejoice in your faith and hope and love the more surely, solidly and soundly, the less you need to learn anything not only from me but from any human being at all. Yet, since when I was there, while you were held back by the modesty of your age, your good parents, who greatly love your good pursuits, deigned to tell me with what ardor of piety and true wisdom you were burning, and most kindly asked me not to deny you my small help in instructing you wherever it was needed, I thought I should admonish you by this letter, according to the options mentioned above, to ask what you wish, so that I may not be superfluous by trying to teach what you know; provided that you hold most firmly that, even if you are able to learn something wholesome through me, he will teach you who is the inner teacher of the inner man, who shows you in your heart that what is said is true, that neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth.

### Scripture references

- 1 Cor 3:7: quotation, high confidence
- Eph 3:16: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: 1 Cor 3:7. Allusion: Eph 3:16.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 266.4 (CSEL 57:650–651; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-266-4).

## Letter 267.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-267-1
- Source: CSEL 57:651–652
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells Fabiola that true presence lies in knowing one another's minds rather than in seeing bodies, and that each is most present to himself through conscience.

### Latin text

Quamquam rescripta reddideris, sic tamen legi litteras sanctitatis tuae. ut eis respondere debitum duxerim. doluisti enim peregrinationem, qua contingit perpetuo gaudere cum sanctis, et desiderium supernae patriae, ubi iam non terrarum spatio diuidemur, sed semper unius contemplatione laetabimur, merito praetulisti. felix es talia fideliter cogitando, amando felicior et ideo eris etiam felicissima consequendo. sed etiam nunc diligentius intuere, unde magis dicamur absentes, utrum quia nostra inuicem corpora non uidemus, an quia signa non damus et recipimus animorum, quod est conloqui. puto enim, quod licet longinquis regionibus corpore separati, si nostras cogitationes nosse possemus, magis essemus nobiscum, quam si uno in loco alter alterutrum conspicantes taciti sederemus nulla in uocibus signa sensus intimi proferentes. nullis corporum motibus nostros animos indicantes. quocirca intellegis ideo unumquemque sibi esse praesentiorem quam alterum alteri, quod unusquisque sibi magis quam alteri notus est non faciem suam, quae. nisi adsit speculum, gestatur et latet, sed conscientiam contuendo, quam et clausis oculis uidet. quanta est igitur etiam uita, quae pro magno habetur, nostra!

### English translation (Claude)

Although you have returned a reply, I have read Your Holiness's letter in such a way that I thought I owed it an answer. For you lamented the pilgrimage in which it falls to us not to rejoice perpetually with the saints, and you rightly preferred the longing for the heavenly fatherland, where we will no longer be divided by distance of lands but will rejoice always in the contemplation of the One. You are happy in thinking such things faithfully, happier in loving them, and so you will be happiest in attaining them. But even now consider more carefully in what respect we are more truly said to be absent: whether because we do not see each other's bodies, or because we do not give and receive signs of our minds, which is to converse. For I think that, even though separated in body in distant regions, if we could know each other's thoughts we would be more with each other than if we sat silent in one place looking at each other, bringing forth no signs of our inner feeling in words, showing our minds by no movements of the body. So you understand that each one is more present to himself than one is to another, because each is better known to himself than to another, not by looking at his own face, which, unless there is a mirror, he carries about and it is hidden, but by beholding his conscience, which he sees even with eyes closed. How great, then, is even our life, which is thought so great!

### Translation notes

- To Fabiola. The letter ends abruptly in the edition.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 267.1 (CSEL 57:651–652; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-267-1).

## Letter 268.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-1
- Source: CSEL 57:652
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine tells the congregation of Hippo that he borrowed seventeen solidi to pay the tax debt of Fascius, who had taken refuge in the church, on condition that the people be asked if Fascius failed to repay.

### Latin text

Notissima mihi et probatissima deuotio sanctitatis uestrae in domino nostro Iesu Christo fiduciam dedit, ut etiam absens praesumerem, unde praesens gaudere consueui. qui semper spiritu uobiscum sum, non solum quia gratia domini nostri Iesu Christi tantae suauitatis flagrare non cessat, sed etiam quia me ipsum, qui uobis in euangelio seruio, angustiam pati non permittitis. cum enim frater noster Fascius debito decem et septem solidorum ab opinatoribus urgeretur, ut redderet, quod ad praesens, unde explicaret se, non inueniebat, ne corporalem pateretur iniuriam, ad auxilium sanctae ecclesiae conuolauit. illi etiam exactores, cum proficisci cogerentur et ideo dilationem dare non possent, grauissimis me querelis onerauerunt ita, ut eis illum traderem aut, quod sibi deberi ostendebant, unde acciperent, prouiderem. cumque obtulissem Fascio, ut uestram sanctitatem de necessitatibus eius adloquerer. pudore deterritus, ne facerem, deprecatus est. ita ego maiore necessitate coartatus a fratre nostro Macedonio decem et septem solidos accepi, quos in causam eius continuo dedi promittente illo, quod ad certum diem cum eis reddendis posset occurrere, et consentiente, ut, si non posset occurrere, sermo de illo fieret ad uestram misericordiam, quam fraternam fratribus exhibere consuestis.

### English translation (Claude)

The well-known and well-proven devotion of Your Holiness in our Lord Jesus Christ has given me confidence to presume, even when absent, on what I am accustomed to rejoice in when present. I am always with you in spirit, not only because the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ never ceases to breathe with such sweetness, but also because you do not allow me, who serve you in the gospel, to suffer distress. For when our brother Fascius was being pressed by the tax collectors for a debt of seventeen solidi, to pay what he could not at present find the means to settle, he fled to the help of the holy church so as not to suffer bodily injury. The collectors, since they were obliged to set out and so could not grant a delay, burdened me with the gravest complaints, demanding that I either hand him over to them or provide for them to receive what they showed was owed them. And when I offered Fascius to speak to Your Holiness about his needs, he begged me, deterred by shame, not to do so. So, pressed by a greater necessity, I received seventeen solidi from our brother Macedonius, which I paid at once in his case, Fascius promising that by a fixed day he could come with the money to repay it, and agreeing that, if he could not come, his case should be put to your mercy, which you are accustomed to show brotherly to the brothers.

### Translation notes

- To the people of the church of Hippo, written in Augustine's absence.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 268.1 (CSEL 57:652; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-1).

## Letter 268.2

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-2
- Source: CSEL 57:652–654
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine asks the congregation to repay the loan for Fascius as an act of charity to a brother in the faith, citing Gal 6:9–10 and 2 Cor 9:6.

### Latin text

Nunc ergo, quoniam absens est, restat, ut subueniatis non illi, quem nemo compellat absentem, sed pollicitationi meae. cuius existimatio uobis semper est praesens. iam enim dies, ad quem se promiserat occursurum, transactus est et ego ei. qui solidos suos fidei meae commisit, quid respondeam, non inuenio. nisi ut faciam, quod me facturum esse promisi. sed quoniam non sum de hac re commonitus, ut die pentecostes. quando aderat maior uestra frequentia, sermonem inde facerem, peto, ut has litteras pro lingua mea praesente habere dignemini admonente uos et exhortante in cordibus uestris deo et domino nostro. cui credidistis, qui numquam discedit a nobis timentibus et honorantibus nomen suum, in quo uobis et nos semper coniuncti sumus, quamuis corpore a uobis profecti esse uideamur, qui uobis de isto bonorum operum semine messem uitae aeternae promittit dicente apostolo: Bonum autem facientes non deficiamus; tempore enim suo metemus infatigabiles. itaque, dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum ad omnes, maxime autem ad domesticos fidei. quoniam ergo domesticus fidei est, Christianus fidelis, catholicus frater noster, pro cuius supplenda necessitate uos peto, ut faciatis, quod dominus imperat, sine tristitia, sine murmuratione et cum laetitia et hilaritate facite; deo enim creditis non homini, quia ille promittit uos nihil eorum, quae misericorditer facitis, perdituros. sed in illo die cum usuris inmortalibus recepturos. et quoniam ipse apostolus dicit: Hoc autem dico: Qui parce seminat. parce et metet, intellegere debetis tempus esse, ut donum uitae aeternae, cum adhuc in ista uita sumus, festinanter et alacriter comparemus, quia, cum finis saeculi uenerit, non dabitur nisi eis, qui per fidem sibi hoc emerunt, antequam uidere potuissent.

### English translation (Claude)

Now, then, since he is absent, it remains for you to come to the aid, not of him, whom no one presses in his absence, but of my promise, whose reputation is always present to you. For the day by which he had promised to come has now passed, and I do not know what to answer the man who entrusted his solidi to my good faith, except to do what I promised I would do. But since I was not reminded of this matter so as to speak about it on the day of Pentecost, when more of you were present, I ask you to deign to take this letter in place of my tongue present among you, God our Lord, in whom you have believed, admonishing and exhorting you in your hearts; he never departs from us who fear and honor his name, and in him we are always joined to you, though we seem to have gone away from you in body; he promises you a harvest of eternal life from this seed of good works, as the apostle says: “Let us not grow weary in doing good; for in due season we shall reap, unwearied. So then, while we have time, let us do good to all, but especially to those of the household of faith.” Since, then, he for whose need I ask you is of the household of faith, a Christian believer, our Catholic brother, do what the Lord commands; do it without sadness, without murmuring, and with joy and cheerfulness; for you entrust it to God, not to man, since he promises that you will lose nothing of what you do mercifully, but will receive it on that day with immortal interest. And since the apostle himself says, “But this I say: he who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly,” you must understand that it is the time for us to acquire the gift of eternal life quickly and eagerly while we are still in this life; because, when the end of the world comes, it will be given only to those who bought it for themselves by faith before they could see it.

### Scripture references

- Gal 6:9–10: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 9:6: quotation, high confidence
- 2 Cor 9:7: allusion, high confidence
- Phil 2:14: allusion, medium confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotations: Gal 6:9–10; 2 Cor 9:6. Allusions: 2 Cor 9:7; Phil 2:14.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 268.2 (CSEL 57:652–654; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-2).

## Letter 268.3

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-3
- Source: CSEL 57:654
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine says the presbyters will make up any shortfall from church funds, but hopes the people will give cheerfully as fruit of their faith.

### Latin text

Scripsi etiam presbyteris. ut, si quid minus fuerit post conlationem sanctitatis uestrae. compleant ex eo, quod habet ecclesia, dum tamen uos, secundum quod placet, hilariter offeratis, quia, siue de uestro siue de ecclesia detur, omnia dei sunt et deuotio magis uestra dulcior erit thesauris ecclesiae. sicut apostolus dicit: Non quia quaero datum, sed requiro fructum. laetificate ergo cor meum, quia de fructibus uestris gaudere cupio; uos enim estis arbores dei, quas assiduis imbribus etiam per nostrum ministerium rigare dignatur. tueatur uos dominus ab omni malo et hic et in futuro saeculo, domini dilectissimi et desiderantissimi fratres.

### English translation (Claude)

I have also written to the presbyters that, if anything is lacking after Your Holiness's collection, they should make it up from what the church has, provided that you offer cheerfully as you please; for whether it is given from yours or from the church's, all things are God's, and your devotion will be sweeter than the church's treasures, as the apostle says: “Not that I seek the gift, but I seek the fruit.” Gladden my heart, then, for I long to rejoice in your fruits; for you are God's trees, which he deigns to water with constant showers even through our ministry. May the Lord protect you from all evil both here and in the world to come, my dearly beloved and most longed-for lords and brothers.

### Scripture references

- Phil 4:17: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- Quotation: Phil 4:17.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 268.3 (CSEL 57:654; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-268-3).

## Letter 269.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-269-1
- Source: CSEL 57:654–655
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: Augustine excuses himself to Bishop Nobilius from attending a church dedication because of winter and old age.

### Latin text

Tanta est sollemnitas, ad quam me affectus tuae fraternitatis inuitat, ut corpusculum meum ad uos traheret uoluntas, nisi teneret infirmitas. possem uenire, si hiems non esset; possem hiemem contemnere, si iuuenis essem; aut enim ferret rigorem temporis feruor aetatis aut temperaret frigus aetatis feruor aestatis. nunc hieme iter tam prolixum non suffero cum annositate algida. quam mecum fero, domine beatissime, sancte ac uenerabilis frater et consacerdos. salutationem debitam reddo meritis tuis; salutem uero meam commendo precibus tuis poscens et ipse a domino, ut dedicationem tantae fabricae pacis prosperitas prosequatur.

### English translation (Claude)

So great is the solemnity to which Your Fraternity's affection invites me that my will would drag my poor body to you, were not weakness holding it back. I could come if it were not winter; I could disregard winter if I were young; for either the warmth of youth would bear the rigor of the season, or the warmth of summer would temper the chill of age. As it is, I cannot endure so long a journey in winter with the cold burden of years that I carry with me, my most blessed lord, holy and venerable brother and fellow priest. I return the greeting due to your merits; and I commend my health to your prayers, asking the Lord myself that the prosperity of peace may attend the dedication of so great a building.

### Translation notes

- To Nobilius, a bishop. One of Augustine's last letters.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 269.1 (CSEL 57:654–655; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-269-1).

## Letter 270.1

- URL: https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-270-1
- Source: CSEL 57:655–656
- Translation: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27

Summary: An unknown writer tells a friend, apparently a bishop, of his sorrow at missing him at Leges, asks his prayers, and points him to the day of judgment.

### Latin text

Cum in urbem Leges anteriori tempore commeassem, nimium sum contristatus, quod te totum ibidem minime potui reperire. inueni enim te medium et, ut ita dicam, partem animae tuae. Seuerum carissimum, de quo ex parte gauisus sum. perfecte enim gauderem, si te totum inuenirem. unde ex parte. qua te reppereram, gratulabar et propter partem tuam, quam nequaquam cernebam, omnibus modis contristabar. proinde dixi animae meae: Quare tristis es et quare conturbas me? spera in deo et faciet praesentem amicum, quem diligis. unde confido in domino et spero, quod me faciet de tua uisione gratulari. o si oculis cerni dilectio posset! profecto uideres, quanta apud te nostra esset dilectio. aut enim aequiperans dilectioni tuae magnum tibi adferret gaudium aut, si maior esset, magnum tibi adferret imitationis studium. ergo. quia in domino te diligo, dilige diligentem. et ut ceteri tecum diligant, per ecclesiasticam auctoritatem hortare. nam quod petis in litteris tuis, ut ego pro te orem, id recte facerem, si ego ipse a peccatis liber essem, ut pro aliis liceret orare. et ideo te admoneo, ut orationes assiduas animi tui pro me emittas ad dominum et memor professionis illam ante oculos tuos constituas diem, in qua iustus ab auditu malo non timebit et ideo iustus non timebit, quia non audiet: Vade in ignem aeternum, sed: Veni, benedicte patris mei, percipe regnum ad quod nos perducat, qui uiuit et regnat in saecula saeculorum. amen.

### English translation (Claude)

When I came earlier to the city of Leges, I was very saddened that I could not find all of you there. For I found half of you and, so to speak, a part of your soul, dearest Severus, in whom I partly rejoiced; for I would have rejoiced perfectly if I had found all of you. So for the part in which I had found you I was glad, and for your part, which I could by no means see, I was in every way saddened. Therefore I said to my soul: “Why are you sad, and why do you disquiet me? Hope in God,” and he will make present the friend you love. So I trust in the Lord and hope that he will make me rejoice in seeing you. O, if love could be seen with the eyes! Surely you would see how great our love for you is. For either, equaling your love, it would bring you great joy, or, if it were greater, it would bring you great zeal to imitate it. Therefore, since I love you in the Lord, love the one who loves you, and urge others by church authority to love with you. As for what you ask in your letter, that I pray for you, I would rightly do so if I myself were free from sins, so as to be permitted to pray for others. And so I admonish you to send up constant prayers of your heart for me to the Lord, and, mindful of your profession, to set before your eyes that day on which the righteous will not fear evil tidings; and the righteous will not fear because he will not hear, “Go into the eternal fire,” but, “Come, blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom”; to which may he lead us who lives and reigns forever and ever. Amen.

### Scripture references

- Ps 42:5 (41:6 LXX): quotation, high confidence
- Ps 112:7 (111:7 LXX): allusion, high confidence
- Matt 25:41: quotation, high confidence
- Matt 25:34: quotation, high confidence

### Translation notes

- The writer and addressee are not named in the text; the letter is printed among Augustine's correspondence but its authorship is uncertain. “Leges” is unidentified. Quotations: Ps 42:5 (LXX 41:6); Ps 112:7 (LXX 111:7); Matt 25:41, 34.

### Citation (SBL)

Augustine, Ep. 270.1 (CSEL 57:655–656; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-epistulae/265-1/#p-270-1).
