Letters on the Arian Controversy 2.1–2.4

Greek text: PG 82; PG 67.English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 2

2.1Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893)

Τοῖς ἀγαπητοῖς καὶ τιμιωτάτοις συλλειτουργοῖς τοῖς ἁπανταχοῦ τῆς καθολικῆς ἐκκλησίας, Ἀλέξανδρος ἐν Κυρίῳ χαίρειν. Ἑνὸς σώματος ὄντος τῆς καθολικῆς ἐκκλησίας, ἐντολῆς τε οὔσης ἐν ταῖς θείαις γραφαῖς, τηρεῖν τὸν σύνδεσμον τῆς ὁμονοίας καὶ εἰρήνης, ἀκόλουθόν ἐστι γράφειν ἡμᾶς, καὶ σημαίνειν ἀλλήλοις τὰ παῤ ἑκάστοις γιγνόμενα, ἵνα εἴτε πάσχει, εἴτε χαίρει ἓν μέλος, ἢ συμπάσχωμεν, ἢ συγχαίρωμεν ἀλλήλοις. Ἐν τῇ ἡμετέρᾳ τοίνυν παροικίᾳ, ἐξῆλθον νῦν ἄνδρες παράνομοι καὶ Χριστομάχοι, διδάσκοντες ἀποστασίαν, ἣν εἰκότως ἄν τις πρόδρομον τοῦ Ἀντιχρίστου νομίσειε καὶ καλέσειε. Καὶ ἐβουλόμην μὲν σιωπῇ παραδοῦναι τὸ τοιοῦτον, ἵν’ ἴσως ἐν τοῖς ἀποστάταις μόνοις ἀναλωθῇ τὸ κακὸν, καὶ μὴ εἰς ἑτέρους τόπους διαβὰν, ῥυπώσῃ τινῶν ἀκεραίων τὰς ἀκοάς: ἐπειδὴ δὲ Εὐσέβιος, ὁ νῦν ἐν τῇ Νικομηδείᾳ, νομίσας ἐπ’ αὐτῷ κεῖσθαι τὰ τῆς ἐκκλησίας, ὅτι καταλείψας τὴν Βηρυτὸν, καὶ ἐποφθαλμίσας τῇ ἐκκλησίᾳ Νικομηδέων, οὐκ ἐκδεδίκηται κατ’ αὐτοῦ, προΐσταται καὶ τούτων τῶν ἀποστατῶν, καὶ γράφειν ἐπεχείρησε πανταχοῦ, συνιστῶν αὐτοὺς, εἴπως ὑποσύρῃ τινὰς ἀγνοοῦντας εἰς τὴν ἐσχάτην καὶ Χριστομάχον αἵρεσιν, ἀνάγκην ἔσχον, εἰδὼς τὸ ἐν τῷ νόμῳ γεγραμμένον, μηκέτι μὲν σιωπῆσαι, ἀναγγεῖλαι δὲ πᾶσιν ὑμῖν, ἵνα γινώσκητε τούς τε ἀποστάτας γενομένους, καὶ τὰ τῆς αἱρέσεως αὐτῶν δύστηνα ῥημάτια, καὶ ἐὰν γράφῃ Εὐσέβιος, μὴ προσέχητε. Τὴν πάλαι γὰρ αὐτοῦ κακόνοιαν τὴν χρόνῳ σιωπηθεῖσαν, νῦν διὰ τούτων ἀνανεῶσαι βουλόμενος, σχηματίζεται μὲν ὡς ὑπὲρ τούτων γράφων: ἔργῳ δὲ δείκνυσιν, ὡς ὅτι ὑπὲρ ἑαυτοῦ σπουδάζων, τοῦτο ποιεῖ. Οἱ μὲν οὖν ἀποστάται γενόμενοι εἰσὶν, Ἄρειος, Ἀχιλλὰς, Ἀειθαλὴς καὶ Καρπώνης, καὶ ἕτερος Ἄρειος, καὶ Σαρμάτης, καὶ Εὐζώϊος, καὶ Λούκιος, καὶ Ἰουλιανὸς, καὶ Μηνᾶς, καὶ Ἑλλάδιος, καὶ Γάϊος, καὶ σὺν αὐτοῖς Σεκοῦνδος καὶ Θεωνᾶς, οἱ ποτὲ λεχθέντες ἐπίσκοποι. Ποῖα δὲ παρὰ τὰς γραφὰς ἐφευρόντες λαλοῦσιν, ἐστὶ ταῦτα. Οὐκ ἀεὶ ὁ θεὸς Πατὴρ ἦν, ἀλλ’ ἦν ὅτε ὁ Θεὸς Πατὴρ οὐκ ἦν: οὐκ ἀεὶ ἦν ὁ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγος, ἀλλ’ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων γέγονεν. Ὁ γὰρ ὢν Θεὸς τὸν μὴ ὄντα ἐκ τοῦ μὴ ὄντος πεποίηκε: διὸ καὶ ἦν ποτὲ ὅτε οὐκ ἦν. Κτίσμα γάρ ἐστι καὶ ποίημα ὁ Υἱός. Οὔτε δὲ ὅμοιος κατ’ οὐσίαν τῷ Πατρί ἐστιν, οὔτε ἀληθινὸς καὶ φύσει τοῦ Πατρὸς Λόγος ἐστὶν, οὔτε ἀληθινὴ Σοφία αὐτοῦ ἐστί:

Tois agapētois kai timiōtatois sylleitourgois tois hapantachou tēs katholikēs ekklēsias, Alexandros en Kyriǭ chairein. Henos sōmatos ontos tēs katholikēs ekklēsias, entolēs te ousēs en tais theiais graphais, tērein ton syndesmon tēs homonoias kai eirēnēs, akolouthon esti graphein hēmas, kai sēmainein allēlois ta par hekastois gignomena, hina eite paschei, eite chairei hen melos, ē sympaschōmen, ē synchairōmen allēlois. En tę̄ hēmeterą toinyn paroikią, exēlthon nyn andres paranomoi kai Christomachoi, didaskontes apostasian, hēn eikotōs an tis prodromon tou Antichristou nomiseie kai kaleseie. Kai eboulomēn men siōpę̄ paradounai to toiouton, hin’ isōs en tois apostatais monois analōthę̄ to kakon, kai mē eis heterous topous diaban, rhypōsę̄ tinōn akeraiōn tas akoas: epeidē de Eusebios, ho nyn en tę̄ Nikomēdeią, nomisas ep’ autǭ keisthai ta tēs ekklēsias, hoti kataleipsas tēn Bēryton, kai epophthalmisas tę̄ ekklēsią Nikomēdeōn, ouk ekdedikētai kat’ autou, proïstatai kai toutōn tōn apostatōn, kai graphein epecheirēse pantachou, synistōn autous, eipōs hyposyrę̄ tinas agnoountas eis tēn eschatēn kai Christomachon hairesin, anankēn eschon, eidōs to en tǭ nomǭ gegrammenon, mēketi men siōpēsai, anangeilai de pasin hymin, hina ginōskēte tous te apostatas genomenous, kai ta tēs haireseōs autōn dystēna rhēmatia, kai ean graphę̄ Eusebios, mē prosechēte. Tēn palai gar autou kakonoian tēn chronǭ siōpētheisan, nyn dia toutōn ananeōsai boulomenos, schēmatizetai men hōs hyper toutōn graphōn: ergǭ de deiknysin, hōs hoti hyper heautou spoudazōn, touto poiei. Hoi men oun apostatai genomenoi eisin, Areios, Achillas, Aeithalēs kai Karpōnēs, kai heteros Areios, kai Sarmatēs, kai Euzōïos, kai Loukios, kai Ioulianos, kai Mēnas, kai Helladios, kai Gaïos, kai syn autois Sekoundos kai Theōnas, hoi pote lechthentes episkopoi. Poia de para tas graphas epheurontes lalousin, esti tauta. Ouk aei ho theos Patēr ēn, all’ ēn hote ho Theos Patēr ouk ēn: ouk aei ēn ho tou Theou Logos, all’ ex ouk ontōn gegonen. Ho gar ōn Theos ton mē onta ek tou mē ontos pepoiēke: dio kai ēn pote hote ouk ēn. Ktisma gar esti kai poiēma ho Huios. Oute de homoios kat’ ousian tǭ Patri estin, oute alēthinos kai physei tou Patros Logos estin, oute alēthinē Sophia autou esti:

To the beloved and most honored fellow-ministers of the catholic church everywhere, Alexander sends greeting in the Lord. Since the body of the catholic church is one, and there is a command in the divine Scriptures to keep the bond of concord and peace, it follows that we should write and make known to one another what happens among each of us, so that whether one member suffers or rejoices, we may either suffer with or rejoice with one another. In our diocese, then, there have now gone out lawless men and fighters against Christ, teaching an apostasy which one might fairly think and call a forerunner of the Antichrist. I wished indeed to pass over such a thing in silence, so that perhaps the evil might be spent among the apostates alone and not pass over into other places and defile the ears of some simple people. But since Eusebius, now in Nicomedia, thinking that the affairs of the church rest with him, because, having left Berytus and cast his eyes on the church of the Nicomedians, he has not been punished for it, puts himself at the head of these apostates too, and has undertaken to write everywhere commending them, in case he might draw some who are ignorant into this last and Christ-fighting heresy, I was compelled, knowing what is written in the law, no longer to keep silent but to announce it to all of you, so that you may know both those who have become apostates and the wretched little phrases of their heresy, and, if Eusebius writes, pay no attention. For wishing now through these men to renew his old ill will, which had been silent for a time, he pretends to be writing on their behalf, but in fact he shows that he is doing this out of zeal for himself. Those who have become apostates, then, are Arius, Achillas, Aithales and Carpones, and another Arius, and Sarmates, and Euzoius, and Lucius, and Julian, and Menas, and Helladius, and Gaius, and with them Secundus and Theonas, who were once called bishops. And what they have invented contrary to the Scriptures and speak is this: “God was not always Father, but there was when God was not Father. The Word of God was not always, but came into being from things that are not. For God who is made him who was not from what was not; therefore also there was once when he was not. For the Son is a creature and a thing made. He is neither like the Father in essence, nor is he the true and natural Word of the Father, nor is he his true Wisdom;

Eph 4:3 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 2:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 John 2:19 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In an encyclical letter Alexander tells all bishops of the apostasy of Arius and his followers, warns them against Eusebius of Nicomedia, and begins to list the Arian propositions.

  • Encyclical letter of Alexander, preserved by Socrates, Church History 1.6 (also in the Athanasian corpus as Depositio Arii), ca. 324.
  • Eusebius of Nicomedia had moved from the see of Berytus to Nicomedia, against church custom. The polemic against him is Alexander's and is translated as written.
  • “What is written in the law” is perhaps Lev 5:1 or Ezek 33:6; uncertain.

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Alexander of Alexandria, Ep. 2.1 (Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893); trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/alexander-alexandria-epistulae/2-1/#p-2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-alexander-alexandria-epistulae-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek (Theodoret, Hist. eccl. 1.4; Socrates, Hist. eccl. 1.6); compared afterwards with NPNF² 3 and NPNF² 2.

2.2Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893)

ἀλλ’ εἷς μὲν τῶν ποιημάτων καὶ γενητῶν ἐστί: καταχρηστικῶς δὲ λόγος καὶ σοφία, γενόμενος καὶ αὐτὸς δὲ τῷ ἰδίῳ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγῳ, καὶ τῇ ἐν τῷ θεῷ Σοφίᾳ, ἐν ᾗ καὶ τὰ πάντα καὶ αὐτὸν πεποίηκεν ὁ Θεός: διὸ καὶ τρεπτός ἐστι καὶ ἀλλοιωτὸς τὴν φύσιν, ὡς καὶ πάντα τὰ λογικά: ξένος τε καὶ ἀλλότριος, καὶ ἀπεσχοινισμένος ἐστὶν ὁ Λόγος τῆς τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐσίας. Καὶ ἄρρητός ἐστιν ὁ Πατὴρ τῷ Υἱῷ: οὔτε γὰρ τελείως καὶ ἀκριβῶς γινώσκει ὁ Λόγος τὸν Πατέρα, οὔτε τελείως ὁρᾷν αὐτὸν δύναται. Καὶ γὰρ ἑαυτοῦ τὴν οὐσίαν οὐκ οἶδεν ὁ Υἱὸς ὡς ἔστι: δἰ ἡμᾶς γὰρ πεποίηται, ἵνα ἡμᾶς δἰ αὐτοῦ ὡς δἰ ὀργάνου κτίσῃ ὁ Θεός: καὶ οὐκ ἂν ὑπέστη, εἰ μὴ ἡμᾶς ὁ Θεὸς ἤθελεν ποιῆσαι. Ἠρώτησε γοῦν τις αὐτοὺς, εἰ δύναται ὁ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγος τραπῆναι ὡς ὁ διάβολος ἐτράπη: καὶ οὐκ ἐφοβήθησαν εἰπεῖν, Ναὶ δύναται: τρεπτῆς γὰρ φύσεως ἐστὶ, γενητὸς καὶ τρεπτὸς ὑπάρχων. Ταῦτα λέγοντας τοὺς περὶ Ἄρειον, καὶ ἐπὶ τούτοις ἀναισχυντοῦντας, αὐτούς τε καὶ τοὺς συνακολουθήσαντας αὐτοῖς, ἡμεῖς μὲν μετὰ τῶν κατ’ Αἴγυπτον ἐπισκόπων καὶ τὰς Λιβύας, ἐγγὺς ἑκατὸν ὄντων, συνελθόντες ἀνεθεματίσαμεν. Οἱ δὲ περὶ Εὐσέβιον προσεδέξαντο, σπουδάζοντες συγκαταμίξαι τὸ ψεῦδος τῇ ἀληθείᾳ, καὶ τῇ εὐσεβείᾳ τὴν ἀσέβειαν. Ἀλλ’ οὐκ ἰσχύσουσι, νικᾷ γὰρ ἡ ἀλήθεια: καὶ οὐδεμία ἐστὶ κοινωνία φωτὶ πρὸς σκότος, οὐδὲ συμφώνησις Χριστῷ πρὸς Βελίαρ. Τίς γὰρ ἤκουσε πώποτε τοιαῦτα; ἢ τίς νῦν ἀκούων οὐ ξενίζεται, καὶ τὰς ἀκοὰς βύει, ὑπὲρ τοῦ μὴ τὸν ῥύπον τούτων τῶν ῥημάτων ψαῦσαι τῆς ἀκοῆς; Τίς ἀκούων Ἰωάννου λέγοντος, Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος, οὐ καταγινώσκει τούτων λεγόντων, Ἠν ποτὲ ὅτε οὐκ ἦν; ἢ τίς ἀκούων ἐν τῷ εὐαγγελίῳ, Ὁ μονογενὴς Υἱὸς, καὶ, Δἰ αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο τὰ πάντα, οὐ μισήσει τούτους φθεγγομένους, ὅτι εἶς ἐστὶ τῶν ποιημάτων ὁ Υἱός; Πῶς δὲ δύναται εἷς εἶναι τῶν δἰ αὐτοῦ γενομένων; ἢ πῶς μονογενὴς, ὁ τοῖς πᾶσι κατ’ ἐκείνους συναριθμούμενος; πῶς δὲ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων ἂν εἴη, τοῦ Πατρὸς λέγοντος, Ἐξηρεύξατο ἡ καρδία μου λόγον ἀγαθόν: καὶ, Ἐκ γαστρὸς πρὸ ἑωσφόρου ἐγέννησα σέ; ἢ πῶς ἀνόμοιος τῇ οὐσίᾳ τοῦ Πατρὸς, ὁ ὢν εἰκὼν τελεία καὶ ἀπαύγασμα τοῦ Πατρὸς, καὶ λέγων, Ὁ ἐμὲ ἑωρακὼς, ἑώρακε τὸν Πατέρα;

all’ heis men tōn poiēmatōn kai genētōn esti: katachrēstikōs de logos kai sophia, genomenos kai autos de tǭ idiǭ tou Theou Logǭ, kai tę̄ en tǭ theǭ Sophią, en hę̄ kai ta panta kai auton pepoiēken ho Theos: dio kai treptos esti kai alloiōtos tēn physin, hōs kai panta ta logika: xenos te kai allotrios, kai apeschoinismenos estin ho Logos tēs tou Theou ousias. Kai arrētos estin ho Patēr tǭ Huiǭ: oute gar teleiōs kai akribōs ginōskei ho Logos ton Patera, oute teleiōs horąn auton dynatai. Kai gar heautou tēn ousian ouk oiden ho Huios hōs esti: di hēmas gar pepoiētai, hina hēmas di autou hōs di organou ktisę̄ ho Theos: kai ouk an hypestē, ei mē hēmas ho Theos ēthelen poiēsai. Ērōtēse goun tis autous, ei dynatai ho tou Theou Logos trapēnai hōs ho diabolos etrapē: kai ouk ephobēthēsan eipein, Nai dynatai: treptēs gar physeōs esti, genētos kai treptos hyparchōn. Tauta legontas tous peri Areion, kai epi toutois anaischyntountas, autous te kai tous synakolouthēsantas autois, hēmeis men meta tōn kat’ Aigypton episkopōn kai tas Libyas, engys hekaton ontōn, synelthontes anethematisamen. Hoi de peri Eusebion prosedexanto, spoudazontes synkatamixai to pseudos tę̄ alētheią, kai tę̄ eusebeią tēn asebeian. All’ ouk ischysousi, niką gar hē alētheia: kai oudemia esti koinōnia phōti pros skotos, oude symphōnēsis Christǭ pros Beliar. Tis gar ēkouse pōpote toiauta? ē tis nyn akouōn ou xenizetai, kai tas akoas byei, hyper tou mē ton rhypon toutōn tōn rhēmatōn psausai tēs akoēs? Tis akouōn Iōannou legontos, En archę̄ ēn ho Logos, ou kataginōskei toutōn legontōn, Ēn pote hote ouk ēn? ē tis akouōn en tǭ euangeliǭ, Ho monogenēs Huios, kai, Di autou egeneto ta panta, ou misēsei toutous phthengomenous, hoti eis esti tōn poiēmatōn ho Huios? Pōs de dynatai heis einai tōn di autou genomenōn? ē pōs monogenēs, ho tois pasi kat’ ekeinous synarithmoumenos? pōs de ex ouk ontōn an eiē, tou Patros legontos, Exēreuxato hē kardia mou logon agathon: kai, Ek gastros pro heōsphorou egennēsa se? ē pōs anomoios tę̄ ousią tou Patros, ho ōn eikōn teleia kai apaugasma tou Patros, kai legōn, Ho eme heōrakōs, heōrake ton Patera?

but he is one of the things made and created, and is called word and wisdom by a misuse of terms, having himself come into being by God's own Word and by the Wisdom in God, in which God made both all things and him. Therefore he is changeable and alterable in nature, like all rational beings; and the Word is foreign and alien to, and separated from, the essence of God. And the Father is ineffable to the Son; for the Word neither knows the Father perfectly and exactly, nor can he see him perfectly. For the Son does not even know his own essence as it is; for he was made for our sake, so that God might create us through him as through an instrument; and he would not have come into existence if God had not wished to make us.” Someone asked them, then, whether the Word of God can change as the devil changed; and they were not afraid to say, “Yes, he can; for he is of a changeable nature, being created and changeable.” Arius and his followers, saying these things and being shameless about them, both themselves and those who followed them, we, having come together with the bishops of Egypt and the Libyas, nearly a hundred in number, have anathematized. But Eusebius and his followers received them, eager to mix falsehood with truth and impiety with piety. But they will not prevail, for the truth conquers; and there is no fellowship of light with darkness, nor agreement of Christ with Beliar. For who ever heard such things? Or who, hearing them now, is not astonished and does not stop his ears, so that the filth of these words may not touch his hearing? Who, hearing John say, “In the beginning was the Word,” does not condemn these men who say, “There was once when he was not”? Or who, hearing in the Gospel “the only-begotten Son” and “through him all things came into being,” will not hate them for uttering that the Son is one of the things made? How can he be one of the things that came into being through him? Or how is he only-begotten who, according to them, is counted with all things? And how could he be from things that are not, when the Father says, “My heart has uttered a good word,” and “From the womb before the morning star I begot you”? Or how is he unlike the essence of the Father, who is the perfect image and radiance of the Father, and who says, “He who has seen me has seen the Father”?

2 Cor 6:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 45:1 (44:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:3 (109:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The letter completes the Arian propositions (the Son a changeable creature, foreign to God's essence), reports their condemnation by about a hundred bishops, and begins to refute them from Scripture.

  • “My heart has uttered a good word” is Ps 45:1 (LXX 44:2); “From the womb before the morning star …” is Ps 110:3 (LXX 109:3).

Topics: Heresy, Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Alexander of Alexandria, Ep. 2.2 (Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893); trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/alexander-alexandria-epistulae/2-1/#p-2-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-alexander-alexandria-epistulae-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek (Theodoret, Hist. eccl. 1.4; Socrates, Hist. eccl. 1.6); compared afterwards with NPNF² 3 and NPNF² 2.

2.3Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893)

Πῶς δὲ εἰ Λόγος καὶ Σοφία ἐστὶ τοῦ Θεοῦ ὁ Υἱὸς, ἦν ποτὲ ὅτε οὐκ ἦν; ἵσον γὰρ ἐστὶν αὐτοὺς λέγειν, ἄλογον καὶ ἄσοφον ποτὲ τὸν Θεόν. Πῶς δὲ τρεπτὸς ἢ ἀλλοιωτὸς, ὁ λέγων δἰ ἑαυτοῦ, Ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ Πατρὶ, καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί: καὶ, Ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν: διὰ δὲ τοῦ προφήτου, Ἴδετέ με ὅτι ἐγὼ εἰμὶ, καὶ οὐκ ἠλλοίωμαι; Εἰ δὲ καὶ ἐπ’ αὐτόν τις τὸν Πατέρα τὸ ῥητὸν δύναται ἀναφέρειν, ἀλλὰ ἁρμοδιώτερον ἂν εἴη περὶ τοῦ Λόγου νῦν λεγόμενον, ὅτι καὶ γενομένος ἄνθρωπος οὐκ ἠλλοίωται, ἀλλ’ ὡς ὁ Ἀπόστολος, Ἰησοῦς Χριστὸς χθὲς καὶ σήμερον ὁ αὐτὸς, καὶ εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας. Τί δὲ ἄρα εἰπεῖν αὐτοὺς ἔπεισεν, ὅτι δἰ ἡμᾶς γέγονε, καίτοι τοῦ Παύλου γράφοντος, Δἰ ὃν τὰ πάντα, καὶ δἰ οὗ τὰ πάντα; Περὶ μὲν οὖν τοῦ βλασφημεῖν αὐτοὺς, ὅτι οὐκ οἶδε τελείως ὁ Υἱὸς τὸν Πατέρα, οὐ δεῖ θαυμάζειν. Ἅπαξ γὰρ προθέμενοι Χριστομαχεῖν, παρακρούονται καὶ τὰς φωνὰς αὐτοῦ Κυρίου λέγοντος, Καθὼς γινώσκει με ὁ Πατὴρ, κᾀγὼ γινώσκω τὸν Πατέρα. Εἰ μὲν οὖν ἐκ μέρους γινώσκει ὁ Πατὴρ τὸν Υἱὸν, δῆλον ὅτι καὶ ὁ Υἱὸς ἐκ μέρους γινώσκει τὸν Πατέρα. Εἰ δὲ τοῦτο λέγειν οὐ θέμις, οἶδε, δὲ τελείως ὁ Πατὴρ τὸν Υἱὸν, δῆλον ὅτι καθὼς γινώσκει ὁ Πατὴρ τὸν ἑαυτοῦ Λόγον, οὕτω καὶ ὁ Λόγος γινώσκει τὸν ἑαυτοῦ Πατέρα, οὗ καὶ ἔστι Λόγος. Καὶ ταῦτα λέγοντες, καὶ ἀναπτύσσοντες τὰς θείας γραφὰς, πολλάκις ἀνετρέψαμεν αὐτούς. Καὶ πάλιν ὡς χαμαιλέοντες μετεβάλλοντο, φιλονεικοῦντες εἰς ἑαυτοὺς ἐφελκύσαι τὸ γεγραμμένον, Ὅτ̓ ἂν ἔλθῃ ὁ ἀσεβὴς εἰς βάθη κακῶν, καταφρονεῖ. Πολλαὶ γοῦν αἱρέσεις πρὸ αὐτῶν γεγόνασιν, αἵτινες πλέον τοῦ δέοντος τολμήσασαι, πεπτώκασιν εἰς ἀφροσύνην: οὗτοι δὲ διὰ πάντων αὐτῶν τῶν ῥημάτων, ἐπιχειρήσαντες ταῖς ἀναιρέσεσι τῆς τοῦ Λόγου θεότητος, ἐδικαίωσαν ἐξ ἑαυτῶν ἐκείνας, ὡς ἐγγύτεροι τοῦ Ἀντιχρίστου γενόμενοι. Διὸ καὶ ἀπεκηρύχθησαν ἀπὸ τῆς ἐκκλησίας, καὶ ἀνεθεματίσθησαν. Λυπούμεθα μὲν οὖν ἐπὶ τῇ ἀπωλείᾳ τούτων, καὶ μάλιστα ὅτι μαθόντες ποτὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ τὰ τῆς ἐκκλησίας, νῦν ἀπεπήδησαν. Οὐ ξενιζόμεθα δέ: τοῦτο γὰρ καὶ Ὑμέναιος καὶ Φιλητὸς πεπόνθασι: καὶ πρὸ αὐτῶν Ἰούδας. ἀκολουθήσας τῷ Σωτῆρι, ὕστερον δὲ προδότης καὶ ἀποστάτης γενόμενος.

Pōs de ei Logos kai Sophia esti tou Theou ho Huios, ēn pote hote ouk ēn? hison gar estin autous legein, alogon kai asophon pote ton Theon. Pōs de treptos ē alloiōtos, ho legōn di heautou, Egō en tǭ Patri, kai ho Patēr en emoi: kai, Egō kai ho Patēr hen esmen: dia de tou prophētou, Idete me hoti egō eimi, kai ouk ēlloiōmai? Ei de kai ep’ auton tis ton Patera to rhēton dynatai anapherein, alla harmodiōteron an eiē peri tou Logou nyn legomenon, hoti kai genomenos anthrōpos ouk ēlloiōtai, all’ hōs ho Apostolos, Iēsous Christos chthes kai sēmeron ho autos, kai eis tous aiōnas. Ti de ara eipein autous epeisen, hoti di hēmas gegone, kaitoi tou Paulou graphontos, Di hon ta panta, kai di hou ta panta? Peri men oun tou blasphēmein autous, hoti ouk oide teleiōs ho Huios ton Patera, ou dei thaumazein. Hapax gar prothemenoi Christomachein, parakrouontai kai tas phōnas autou Kyriou legontos, Kathōs ginōskei me ho Patēr, kągō ginōskō ton Patera. Ei men oun ek merous ginōskei ho Patēr ton Huion, dēlon hoti kai ho Huios ek merous ginōskei ton Patera. Ei de touto legein ou themis, oide, de teleiōs ho Patēr ton Huion, dēlon hoti kathōs ginōskei ho Patēr ton heautou Logon, houtō kai ho Logos ginōskei ton heautou Patera, hou kai esti Logos. Kai tauta legontes, kai anaptyssontes tas theias graphas, pollakis anetrepsamen autous. Kai palin hōs chamaileontes meteballonto, philoneikountes eis heautous ephelkysai to gegrammenon, Hot an elthę̄ ho asebēs eis bathē kakōn, kataphronei. Pollai goun haireseis pro autōn gegonasin, haitines pleon tou deontos tolmēsasai, peptōkasin eis aphrosynēn: houtoi de dia pantōn autōn tōn rhēmatōn, epicheirēsantes tais anairesesi tēs tou Logou theotētos, edikaiōsan ex heautōn ekeinas, hōs engyteroi tou Antichristou genomenoi. Dio kai apekērychthēsan apo tēs ekklēsias, kai anethematisthēsan. Lypoumetha men oun epi tę̄ apōleią toutōn, kai malista hoti mathontes pote kai autoi ta tēs ekklēsias, nyn apepēdēsan. Ou xenizometha de: touto gar kai Hymenaios kai Philētos peponthasi: kai pro autōn Ioudas. akolouthēsas tǭ Sōtēri, hysteron de prodotēs kai apostatēs genomenos.

And how, if the Son is the Word and Wisdom of God, was there once when he was not? For it is the same as their saying that God was once without word and without wisdom. And how is he changeable or alterable, who says through himself, “I am in the Father and the Father in me,” and “I and the Father are one,” and through the prophet, “See me, that I am, and I have not changed”? And even if someone can refer the saying to the Father himself, yet it would more fittingly be said now of the Word, that even having become man he has not changed, but, as the Apostle says, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and for ever.” What then persuaded them to say that he came into being for our sake, though Paul writes, “for whom are all things and through whom are all things”? As for their blasphemy that the Son does not know the Father perfectly, one need not be surprised. For having once resolved to fight against Christ, they also thrust aside the words of the Lord himself, who says, “As the Father knows me, I also know the Father.” If, then, the Father knows the Son in part, it is clear that the Son also knows the Father in part. But if it is not lawful to say this, and the Father knows the Son perfectly, it is clear that as the Father knows his own Word, so also the Word knows his own Father, whose Word he is. By saying these things and unfolding the divine Scriptures we have often refuted them. And again, like chameleons, they changed, striving to draw upon themselves what is written: “When the wicked man comes into the depth of evils, he despises.” Many heresies, then, have arisen before them, which, daring more than is right, have fallen into folly; but these men, by all their words attempting to do away with the divinity of the Word, have justified those in comparison with themselves, having come nearer to the Antichrist. Therefore they have been publicly expelled from the church and anathematized. We grieve, then, at their destruction, especially because, having once themselves learned the things of the church, they have now leaped away. Yet we are not astonished; for Hymenaeus and Philetus suffered this too, and before them Judas, who followed the Savior but afterward became a traitor and apostate.

John 14:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Mal 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 32:39 (allusion, low confidence) · Heb 13:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 18:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:17 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Alexander refutes the claims that the Son is changeable and does not know the Father, noting that the Arians have been expelled like Hymenaeus, Philetus, and Judas before them.

  • “See me, that I am, and I have not changed” is Mal 3:6 (LXX, with Deut 32:39). “When the wicked man comes into the depth of evils, he despises” is Prov 18:3 (LXX).

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Alexander of Alexandria, Ep. 2.3 (Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893); trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/alexander-alexandria-epistulae/2-1/#p-2-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-alexander-alexandria-epistulae-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek (Theodoret, Hist. eccl. 1.4; Socrates, Hist. eccl. 1.6); compared afterwards with NPNF² 3 and NPNF² 2.

2.4Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893)

Καὶ περὶ τούτων δὲ αὐτῶν, οὐκ ἀδίδακτοι μεμενήκαμεν: ἀλλ’ ὁ μὲν Κύριος προείρηκε, Βλέπετε μή τις ὑμᾶς πλανήσῃ: πολλοὶ γὰρ ἐλεύσονται ἐπὶ τῷ ὀνόματί μου λέγοντες, Ἐγὼ εἰμὶ, καὶ ὁ καιρὸς ἤγγικε: καὶ πολλοὺς πλανήσουσι: μὴ πορευθῆτε ὀπίσω αὐτῶν. Ὁ δὲ Παῦλος μαθὼν ταῦτα παρὰ τοῦ Σωτῆρος, ἔγραψεν, Ὅτι ἐν ὑστέροις καιροῖς ἀποστήσονταί τινες τῆς πίστεως τῆς ὑγιαινούσης, προσέχοντες πνεύμασι πλάνοις, καὶ διδασκαλίαις δαιμονίων, ἀποστρεφομένων τὴν ἀλήθειαν. Τοῦ τοίνυν Κυρίου καὶ Σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, διά τε αὑτοῦ παραγγέλλοντος, καὶ διὰ τοῦ Ἀποστόλου σημαίνοντος περὶ τῶν τοιούτων, ἀκολούθως ἡμεῖς αὐτήκοοι τῆς ἀσεβείας αὐτῶν γενόμενοι, ἀνεθεματίσαμεν, καθὰ προείπομεν, τοὺς τοιούτους, ἀποδείξαντες αὐτοὺς ἀλλοτρίους τῆς καθολικῆς ἐκκλησίας τε καὶ πίστεως. Ἐδηλώσαμεν δὲ καὶ τῇ ὑμετέρᾳ θεοσεβείᾳ, ἀγαπητοὶ καὶ τιμιώτατοι συλλειτουργοὶ, ἵνα μήτε τινας ἐξ αὐτῶν, εἰ προπετεύσαιντο καὶ πρὸς ὑμᾶς ἐλθεῖν, μὴ προσδέξησθε, μήτε Εὐσεβίῳ, ἢ ἑτέρῳ τινὶ γράφοντι περὶ αὐτῶν πεισθῆτε. Πρέπει γὰρ ὑμᾶς ὡς Χριστιανοὺς ὄντας, πάντας τοὺς κατὰ Χριστοῦ λέγοντάς τε καὶ φρονοῦντας, ὡς Θεομάχους καὶ φθορέας τῶν ψυχῶν ἀποστρέφεσθαι, καὶ μηδὲ κἂν χαίρειν τοῖς τοιούτοις λέγειν, ἵνα μή ποτε καὶ ταῖς ἁμαρτίαις αὐτῶν κοινωνοὶ γενώμεθα, ὡς παρήγγειλεν ὁ μακάριος Ἰωάννης. Προσείπατε τοὺς παῤ ὑμῖν ἀδελφούς. Ὑμᾶς οἱ σὺν ἐμοὶ προσαγορεύουσι.

Kai peri toutōn de autōn, ouk adidaktoi memenēkamen: all’ ho men Kyrios proeirēke, Blepete mē tis hymas planēsę̄: polloi gar eleusontai epi tǭ onomati mou legontes, Egō eimi, kai ho kairos ēngike: kai pollous planēsousi: mē poreuthēte opisō autōn. Ho de Paulos mathōn tauta para tou Sōtēros, egrapsen, Hoti en hysterois kairois apostēsontai tines tēs pisteōs tēs hygiainousēs, prosechontes pneumasi planois, kai didaskaliais daimoniōn, apostrephomenōn tēn alētheian. Tou toinyn Kyriou kai Sōtēros hēmōn Iēsou Christou, dia te hautou parangellontos, kai dia tou Apostolou sēmainontos peri tōn toioutōn, akolouthōs hēmeis autēkooi tēs asebeias autōn genomenoi, anethematisamen, katha proeipomen, tous toioutous, apodeixantes autous allotrious tēs katholikēs ekklēsias te kai pisteōs. Edēlōsamen de kai tę̄ hymeterą theosebeią, agapētoi kai timiōtatoi sylleitourgoi, hina mēte tinas ex autōn, ei propeteusainto kai pros hymas elthein, mē prosdexēsthe, mēte Eusebiǭ, ē heterǭ tini graphonti peri autōn peisthēte. Prepei gar hymas hōs Christianous ontas, pantas tous kata Christou legontas te kai phronountas, hōs Theomachous kai phthoreas tōn psychōn apostrephesthai, kai mēde kan chairein tois toioutois legein, hina mē pote kai tais hamartiais autōn koinōnoi genōmetha, hōs parēngeilen ho makarios Iōannēs. Proseipate tous par hymin adelphous. Hymas hoi syn emoi prosagoreuousi.

And concerning these very men we have not remained untaught; but the Lord foretold, “Take heed that no one leads you astray; for many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am he,’ and ‘The time is near,’ and they will lead many astray; do not go after them.” And Paul, having learned these things from the Savior, wrote that “in later times some will depart from the sound faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and teachings of demons,” who turn away from the truth. Since, then, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ both commands through himself and signifies through the Apostle concerning such people, we, accordingly, having heard their impiety with our own ears, have anathematized such men, as we said before, declaring them strangers to the catholic church and faith. And we have made this known also to your godliness, beloved and most honored fellow-ministers, so that you may not receive any of them, if they should rashly venture to come to you also, nor be persuaded by Eusebius or anyone else writing about them. For it befits you, as Christians, to turn away from all who speak and think against Christ, as fighters against God and corrupters of souls, and not even to say “Greetings” to such people, lest we too become partakers in their sins, as the blessed John commanded. Greet the brothers with you. Those with me greet you.

Luke 21:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 4:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 John 1:10 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 John 1:11 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: As Christ and Paul foretold, false teachers have come; Alexander asks the bishops to refuse communion and even greetings to the Arians and to ignore Eusebius's letters.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Alexander of Alexandria, Ep. 2.4 (Hussey, Socratis Scholastici Ecclesiastica Historia (Oxford, 1853; Bright 1893); trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/alexander-alexandria-epistulae/2-1/#p-2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-alexander-alexandria-epistulae-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek (Theodoret, Hist. eccl. 1.4; Socrates, Hist. eccl. 1.6); compared afterwards with NPNF² 3 and NPNF² 2.