On Joseph

The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.

Show

Chapter 1

1CSEL 32.2:73–74

Sanctorum uita ceteris norma uiuendi est, ideoque digestam plenius accipimus seriem scripturarum, ut dum Abraham, Isaac et Iacob ceterosque iustos legendo cognoscimus, uelut quendam nobis innocentiae tramitem eorum uirtute reseratum enitentibus uestigiis persequamur. de quibus mihi cum frequens tractatus fuerit, hodie sancti Ioseph historia occurrit. in quo cum plurima fuerint genera uirtutum, tum praecipue insigne effulsit castimoniae. iustum est igitur ut, cum in Abraham didiceritis inpigram fidei deuotionem, in Isaac sincerae mentis puritatem, in Iacob singularem animi laborumque patientiam, ex illa generalitate uirtutum in ipsas species disciplinarum intendatis animum. nam licet illa diffusiora, tamen ista expressiora sunt eoque facilius mentem penetrant quo magis circumscripta ac determinata sunt.

The life of the saints is the rule of living for everyone else, and therefore we receive the sequence of the Scriptures set out more fully, so that, as we come to know Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the other just men by reading, we may follow with shining footsteps a kind of path of innocence opened for us by their virtue. Since I have often treated of them, today the story of holy Joseph presents itself. Though there were very many kinds of virtue in him, the virtue of chastity shone out in him especially. It is right, then, that, having learned in Abraham the tireless devotion of faith, in Isaac the purity of a sincere mind, in Jacob a singular patience of spirit and in labors, you should turn your mind from that general class of virtues to the particular kinds of discipline. For though the former are more widespread, the latter are more clearly defined, and they penetrate the mind the more easily the more they are circumscribed and determined.

Chapter 2

2CSEL 32.2:74

Sit igitur nobis propositus sanctus Ioseph tamquam speculum castitatis. in eius enim moribus, in eius actibus lucet pudicitia et quidam splendet castimoniae comes nitor gratiae. unde etiam a parentibus plus quam ceteri filii diligebatur. sed ea res inuidiae fuit, quod silentio praetereundum non fuit.

Let holy Joseph, then, be set before us as a mirror of chastity. For in his character and in his actions modesty shines, and a certain brightness of grace, the companion of chastity, gleams. Hence he was also loved by his parents more than the other sons. But this was the occasion of envy, which should not be passed over in silence.

Chapter 3

3CSEL 32.2:74

hinc ergo argumentum totius historiae processit, simul ut cognoscamus perfectum uirum non moueri ulciscendi doloris iniuria nec malorum rependere uicem. unde et Dauid ait: si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala. quid autem esset quo praeferri Ioseph mereretur ceteris, si aut laedentes laesisset aut diligentes dilexisset? hoc enim plerique faciunt. sed illud mirabile, si diligas inimicum tuum, quod saluator docet. iure ergo mirandus qui hoc fecit ante euangelium, ut laesus parceret, adpetitus ignosceret, uenditus non referret iniuriam, sed gratiam pro contumelia solueret, quod post euangelium omnes didicimus et seruare non possumus.

From here, then, the plot of the whole story proceeded, and at the same time we may learn that the perfect man is not moved by the injury of a grievance to avenge it, nor repays evil for evil. Hence David too says: 'If I have repaid those who returned evil to me.' What would there be for which Joseph deserved to be preferred to the others, if he had either injured those who injured him or loved those who loved him? For most people do this. But that is wonderful, if you love your enemy, as the Savior teaches. Rightly, then, is he to be admired who did this before the gospel: when injured he spared, when attacked he forgave, when sold he did not return the injury but repaid insult with kindness — what after the gospel we have all learned and cannot keep.

Chapter 4

4CSEL 32.2:74

discamus ergo et sanctorum inuidiam, ut imitemur patientiam, et cognoscamus illos non naturae praestantioris fuisse, sed obseruationis nec uitia nescisse, sed emendasse. quodsi inuidia etiam sanctos adussit, quanto magis cauendum est ne inflammet peccatores?

Let us learn, then, of the envy suffered even by saints, so that we may imitate their patience, and recognize that they were not of a superior nature but of superior observance, and that they did not not know vices but corrected them. But if envy scorched even the saints, how much more must we take care lest it inflame sinners?

Chapter 5

5CSEL 32.2:74–75

Instruimur igitur qualis esse debeat affectus parentum filiorumque gratia. amare liberos dulce et inpensius amare praedulce, sed frequenter amor ipse patrius, nisi moderationem teneat, nocet liberis, si aut nimia indulgentia dilectum resoluat aut praelatione unius ceteros ab adfectu germanitatis auertat. plus adquiritur filio, cui fratrum adquiritur amor. haec praeclarior munificentia patrum. haec ditior hereditas filiorum. iungat liberos aequalis gratia, quos iuncxit aequalis natura. lucrum pietas nescit pecuniae, in quo pietatis dispendium est. quid miraris si propter fundum aut domum oriuntur inter fratres iurgia, quando propter tunicam inter Iacob sancti filios exarsit inuidia?

We are instructed, then, what the affection of parents ought to be for the sake of their children. To love one's children is sweet, and to love them more intensely is very sweet; but often fatherly love itself, unless it keeps moderation, harms children, if either excessive indulgence makes the loved one slack, or the preference of one turns the others away from brotherly affection. More is gained for a son for whom the love of his brothers is gained. This is the more splendid generosity of fathers, this the richer inheritance of sons. Let equal favor join the children whom equal nature has joined. Piety knows no gain of money in which there is a loss of piety. Why do you wonder if quarrels arise between brothers over a farm or a house, when envy blazed up among the sons of holy Jacob over a tunic?

Chapter 6

6CSEL 32.2:75

quid ergo? reprehendendus Iacob, quia praeferebat unum ceteris? sed nec libertatem possumus auferre parentibus, ne eos plus diligant quos plus credant mereri. nec filiis resecare debemus studium plus placendi. denique et Iacob illum plus amabat, in quo maiora uirtutum insignia praeuidebat, ut non tam filium pater praetulisse uideatur quam propheta mysterium, meritoque uariam tunicam fecit ei, quo significaret eum diuersarum uirtutum amictu fratribus praeferendum.

What then? Is Jacob to be blamed because he preferred one to the others? But neither can we take from parents the freedom to love more those whom they believe deserve more, nor should we cut off in children the eagerness to please more. Indeed Jacob loved more the one in whom he foresaw greater marks of virtue, so that it seems not so much that a father preferred a son as that a prophet preferred a mystery; and rightly he made him a many-colored tunic, to signify that he was to be preferred to his brothers by the garment of various virtues.

Chapter 7

7CSEL 32.2:75–76

Denique in puero adhuc refulsit diuina gratia, siquidem somniauit quod, cum alligasset, ut sibi uidebatur per uisum, manipulos cum fratribus suis, surrexerit manipulus eius et steterit erectus, conuersi autem fratrum manipuli adorauerint manipulum suum. in quo utique futura domini Iesu resurrectio reuelata est. quem et Hierosolymis cum uidissent, undecim adorauere discipuli et omnes sancti, cum resurrexerint, adorabunt fructus honorum operum praeferentes, sicut scriptum est: uenientes autem uenient cum exultatione tollentes manipulos suos. unde fratres, licet somnii fidem per inuidiam derogarent, interpretationem tamen eius propriis sermonibus exprimentes responderunt ei: numquid regnando regnaturus es nobis aut dominando dominaturus es nobis? regem enim uenturum uisio illa significabat, quem omnis caro generis humani inflexo adoraret genu.

Indeed divine grace shone out in him while still a boy, since he dreamed that, when he had bound sheaves with his brothers, as it seemed to him in the vision, his sheaf rose and stood upright, while his brothers' sheaves turned and bowed down to his sheaf. In this the future resurrection of the Lord Jesus was surely revealed. When the eleven disciples saw him in Jerusalem, they worshiped him, and all the saints, when they rise again, will worship him, bringing the fruits of good works, as it is written: 'But coming they will come with exultation, carrying their sheaves.' Hence his brothers, though from envy they disparaged the trustworthiness of the dream, nevertheless expressed its interpretation in their own words and answered him: 'Shall you indeed reign over us, or shall you indeed have dominion over us?' For that vision signified the king to come, whom all the flesh of the human race would worship on bended knee.

Chapter 8

8CSEL 32.2:76

uidit autem aliud somnium et narrauit illud patri suo et fratribus, eo quod sol et luna et undecim stellae adorarent eum. unde obiurgauit illum pater eius dicens: quid ergo erit hoc uisum, quod somniasti? numquid uenientes ego et mater tua et fratres tui adorabimus te super terram? quis est ille quem parentes et fratres adorauerunt super terram nisi Christus Iesus, quando eum Ioseph et mater cum discipulis adorabant, deum uerum in illo corpore confitentes, de quo solo dictum est: laudate eum, sol et luna; laudate eum, omnes stellae et lumen? obiurgatio autem patris quid significat nisi duritiam populi Istrahel, ex quibus Christus secundum carnem, quem hodieque deum esse non credunt nec uolunt adorare quasi dominum, quia ex se, natum esse cognoscunt? audiunt itaque responsa eius, et non intellegunt: legunt ipsi quod eum sol et luna laudant, sed nolunt credere dictum esse de Christo. itaque Iacob typo fallitur alieno, sed suo amore non fallitur. pietas in eo paterna non deerrat, sed erraturae plebis adfectus exprimitur.

He saw another dream and told it to his father and brothers: that the sun and moon and eleven stars bowed down to him. Hence his father rebuked him, saying: 'What then is this vision that you have dreamed? Shall I and your mother and your brothers come and bow down to you upon the earth?' Who is he whom parents and brothers worshiped upon the earth but Christ Jesus, when Joseph and his mother with the disciples worshiped him, confessing true God in that body, of whom alone it is said: 'Praise him, sun and moon; praise him, all stars and light'? And what does the father's rebuke signify but the hardness of the people of Israel, from whom is Christ according to the flesh, whom even today they do not believe to be God nor will worship as Lord, because they know he was born from among them? So they hear his answers and do not understand; they read that sun and moon praise him, but they will not believe it was said of Christ. So Jacob is mistaken in a type not his own, but he is not mistaken in his own love. Fatherly love does not go astray in him; rather, the disposition of a people that would go astray is expressed.

Chapter 9

9CSEL 32.2:76–78

Non ergo tanto somnio patriarcha non credidit, qui utrumque pariter gemino prophetabat oraculo, ut et personam iusti repraesentaret et populi, quod dei filius uenturus esset in terras, qui et diligeretur a iustis et negaretur a perfidis. uidebat igitur futurae incarnationis mysteria, qui filium mittebat ad fratres, ut uideret si recte sunt oues. quas oues deus in illo iam tunc patriarchae studio requirebat nisi eas, de quibus ipse dominus Iesus in euangelio dixit: non ueni nisi ad oues perditas domus Istrahel? et misit inquit in Sychem, quod interpretatione dicitur umerus siue dorsum, hoc est ad eos qui non conuerterentur ad dominum, sed fugientes a facie eius se auerterent, quod est proprie peccatoris; exiit enim Cain a facie dei, et propheta dicit: pones eos dorsum. iustus autem non se auertit a domino, sed occurrit dicens: oculi mei semper ad dominum. et Esaias dicenti domino: quem mittam? sponte se obtulit dicens: ecce ego. et Symeon expectauit, ut uideret Christum dominum, et, posteaquam uidit, quoniam remissorem peccatorum et totius mundi uiderat redemptorem, quasi leuatus a peccato poposcit usu carnis huius absolui dicens: nunc dimitte, domine, seruum tuum, quoniam uiderunt oculi mei salutare tuum. et Zacchaeus hinc primum suae praerogatiuam commendationis inuenit, quod in arborem, ut Christum uideret. ascendit. ergo Ioseph a patre est missus ad fratres, ab illo magis patre, qui filio proprio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum, ab illo patre, de quo scriptum est: deus filium suum mittens in similitudinem carnis peccati.

So it was not that the patriarch did not believe so great a dream; he prophesied both things together by a twofold oracle, representing both the person of the just and that of the people: that the Son of God would come to earth, who would be both loved by the just and denied by the faithless. He saw, then, the mysteries of the future incarnation, who sent his son to his brothers to see whether the sheep were well. What sheep was God already then seeking in that patriarch's concern but those of whom the Lord Jesus himself said in the gospel: 'I came only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel'? 'And he sent him,' it says, 'to Shechem,' which by interpretation means 'shoulder' or 'back,' that is, to those who would not turn to the Lord but, fleeing from his face, would turn their backs — which is properly the mark of a sinner; for Cain went out from the face of God, and the prophet says: 'You will make them turn their back.' But the just man does not turn away from the Lord but goes to meet him, saying: 'My eyes are ever toward the Lord.' And Isaiah, when the Lord said: 'Whom shall I send?', offered himself of his own accord, saying: 'Here am I.' And Simeon waited to see Christ the Lord, and after he saw him, since he had seen the forgiver of sins and the redeemer of the whole world, as though relieved of sin he asked to be released from the use of this flesh, saying: 'Now dismiss your servant, Lord, for my eyes have seen your salvation.' And Zacchaeus first found the prerogative of his commendation in climbing a tree to see Christ. So Joseph was sent by his father to his brothers — rather, by that Father who did not spare his own Son but delivered him up for us all, by that Father of whom it is written: 'God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh.'

Chapter 10

10CSEL 32.2:78

Et errabat, inquit, Joseph, quia fratres suos inuenire non poterat. non inmerito errabat, qui quaerebat errantes; eos enim agnoscit dominus qui sunt ipsius. denique et Iesus fatigatus ex itenere sedebat super puteum. fatigabatur, qui non inueniebat dei populum, quem quaerebat; exierat enim a facie domini. qui enim culpam sequitur exit a Christo. peccator exit. iustus intrat. denique Adam se peccator abscondit, iustus autem dicit: intret ratio mea in conspectu tuo.

'And Joseph wandered,' it says, because he could not find his brothers. Not without reason did he wander, who was seeking the wanderers; for the Lord knows those who are his. Indeed Jesus too, tired from the journey, sat by the well. He was weary, who did not find the people of God he was seeking; for it had gone out from the face of the Lord. For whoever follows guilt goes out from Christ. The sinner goes out; the just man goes in. Indeed Adam, a sinner, hid himself; but the just man says: 'Let my reasoning enter into your sight.'

Chapter 11

11CSEL 32.2:78–79

inuenit autem fratres suos Ioseph in Dothaim, quod significat defectionem. ubi est enim nisi in defectione qui deum deserit? nec mirum si deficiebant qui non audiebant dicentem: uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. uenit igitur Ioseph in Dothaim, et praeuiderunt illum de longe uenientem, antequam adpropiaret ad illos. et insaeuiebant, ut occiderent eum. merito longe erant qui erant in defectione et ideo insaeuiebant, quia iis non adpropiauerat Christus. nam si adpropiasset iis typus Christi, fratrem utique dilexissent; sed prope esse non poterant qui parricidium cogitabant. ecce inquit somniator ille uenit. nunc ergo uenite occidamus illum. nonne haec uerba dicebant qui de parricidiali sacrilegio cogitabant, sicut Solomon de ipsis ait:

Joseph found his brothers in Dothan, which means 'failing.' For where is he who deserts God, if not in failing? Nor is it surprising that those failed who did not hear him saying: 'Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you.' So Joseph came to Dothan, and they saw him coming from afar, before he drew near to them, and they raged, to kill him. Rightly were they far away who were in failing, and therefore they raged, because Christ had not drawn near to them. For if the type of Christ had drawn near to them, they would surely have loved their brother; but those who were plotting fratricide could not be near. 'Behold,' it says, 'that dreamer is coming. Now come, let us kill him.' Did not those who were plotting the sacrilege of fratricide say these words, as Solomon says of them:

Chapter 12

12CSEL 32.2:79

tollamus iustum, quia inutilis est nobis? et addiderunt in Genesi: et uidebimus quid erunt somnia eius. hoc scriptum est de Ioseph, conpletum est de Christo, quando Iudaei in eius passione dixerunt: si rex Istrahel est, descendat nunc de cruce, et credimus ei. confidit in deum: liberet nunc eum, si uult eum. numquid et ipsi fratres tam impii, ut fratrem occiderent? et unde tantorum merita patriarcharum, ut lex tribus totius plebis eorum uocabulis designaret? quomodo conueniunt pietatis nomina et sceleris insignia? sic etiam isti typo populi, non animi sui uitio laborabant. inde omnis inuidia, inde parricidii meditatio: inuidia per figuram, pietas per adfectum.

'Let us take away the just man, for he is useless to us'? And they added in Genesis: 'And we shall see what his dreams will be.' This was written of Joseph and fulfilled in Christ, when the Jews said at his passion: 'If he is the King of Israel, let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe him. He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he wants him.' Were these brothers so impious as to kill their brother? And whence the merits of such great patriarchs, that the law should designate the tribes of the whole people by their names? How do names of piety and marks of crime agree? So these too labored under the type of the people, not through a fault of their own soul. Hence all the envy, hence the plotting of fratricide: envy by way of figure, piety by way of affection.

Chapter 13

13CSEL 32.2:79–80

Denique Ruben et Iudas germanitatis pia iura seruantes de manibus eorum liberare eum cupiebant, meritoque Iudas paterna benedictione praefertur, cum dicitur ei: adorabunt te filii patris tui. catulus leonis Iuda et ipse expectatio gentium. quod utique soli conuenit Christo, cui repositum fuit ut adoraretur a fratribus et expectaretur a gentibus, lauaret in uino stolam suam proprii corporis passione, quia carnem suam nulla peccati labe maculauit. Aser quoque non utique sibi conuenire credebat Aser, pinguis eius panis et ipse Aser cum principibus. quid uero ipse Ioseph, cui dictum est: filius ampliandus meus Ioseph, filius ampliandus meus, zelatus filius meus, filius meus adulescentior, ad me reuertere, in quem consilium conferentes maledicebant, in quo benedictio praeualuit super benedictiones montium manentium et desideriis collium aeternorum, quem significari in se intellegebat nisi illum qui omnium merita supereminens supra omnium desideria sanctorum inmensae teneret apicem potestatis, quem uoto nullus aequaret? conpensatur ergo in patriarchis inuidia per gratiam, qui et excusantur a culpa et reuelationis munere consecrantur. non enim tam culpabile est dixisse quae plebis sunt quam beatum uidisse quae Christi sunt. subierunt personam peccatoris populi, ut acciperent gratiam domini redemptoris. certe culpam aboleuit gratia, gratiam culpa non minuit.

Indeed Reuben and Judah, keeping the devoted rights of brotherhood, wished to free him from their hands; and rightly Judah is preferred in his father's blessing, when it is said to him: 'The sons of your father shall bow down to you. Judah is a lion's whelp, and he is the expectation of the nations.' This surely fits Christ alone, for whom it was reserved to be worshiped by his brothers and awaited by the nations, and to wash his robe in wine by the passion of his own body, because he stained his flesh with no blemish of sin. Asher too surely did not believe that this fitted himself: 'Asher, his bread is rich, and he is with princes.' And what of Joseph himself, to whom it was said: 'My son Joseph is to be increased, my son is to be increased, my son envied, my youngest son, return to me' — against whom they took counsel and cursed, in whom the blessing prevailed above the blessings of the abiding mountains and the desires of the everlasting hills — whom did he understand to be signified in himself, except him who, surpassing the merits of all and above the desires of all the saints, holds the summit of immeasurable power, whom no one equals even in wish? The envy of the patriarchs, then, is compensated by grace: they are both excused from guilt and consecrated by the gift of revelation. For it is not so blameworthy to have spoken what belongs to the people as it is blessed to have seen what belongs to Christ. They took on the role of a sinful people, to receive the grace of the Lord the Redeemer. Certainly grace abolished the guilt; guilt did not lessen the grace.

Chapter 14

14CSEL 32.2:80–82

et ut agnoscamus omne hoc de populo et de domino Iesu esse mysterium, uenite inquit uendamus Ioseph Ismahelitis. quid interpretationis habet nomen Ioseph nisi quod diuinam gratiam significet et expressionem dei summi? quis igitur uenditur nisi ille qui, cum in forma dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo, sed semet ipsum exinaniuit formam serui accipiens? neque enim nos eum emissemus, nisi uendidissent eum sui. male uendiderunt, peius emerunt. uendiderunt negotiatoribus, bonum odorem emerunt a proditoribus; uendidit enim Iudas, emerunt Ismahelitae, qui significantur Latina interpretatione odio habentes deum suum. ideo alibi uiginti, alibi uiginti et quinque aureis, alibi triginta inuenimus emptum Ioseph, quia non omnibus unius aestimatione pretii ualet Christus. aliis minus, aliis amplius. fides ementis incrementum est mercis. religiosiori pretiosior deus, peccatori pretiosior est redemptor. pluris et illi ualet qui plus habet gratiae. sed etiam cui multa donata sunt pluris ualet, quia cui plus remissum est plus diligit, sicut ipse dominus in euangelio pronuntiauit de illa muliere, quae super eius pedes effudit unguentum et lacrimis lauit et capillis suis tersit et osculis siccauit, de qua ait ad Simonem: propter quod dico tibi: remissa sunt ei peccata eius multa, quoniam dilexit multum. cui autem minus dimittitur minus diligit. interdum diuersitates pretii non solum quantitatis habent, sed etiam numeri expressionem, sicut habes de unguento, quod ad sepeliendum se dominus fusum esse memorauit, (ut) scriptum dicente Iuda: potuit hoc ueniri denariis trecentis, quo numero non quantitatis, sed significatio crucis uidetur expressa. ita hic quoque diuersitas uel uiginti uel triginta. aureorum uel argenteorum habet uel geminatae uel trinitae perfectionis indicium. nam uiginti quinque aurei iubelaei, qui est remissionis numerus, significant pretiosissimam portionem. hic quoque, ut dominicae figuram passionis aduertas, ait Iudas patriarcha: tradamus Ioseph Ismahelitis; manus autem nostrae non sint iniectae super eum. et bene superius dixerat: manus autem nolite inferre ei, quod Iudaei in domini passione dixerunt: nobis non licet interficere quemquam, ut sermo Iesu inpleretur significans qua morte moriturus esset.

And so that we may recognize that all this is a mystery concerning the people and the Lord Jesus, 'Come,' he says, 'let us sell Joseph to the Ishmaelites.' What interpretation does the name Joseph have, except that it signifies divine grace and the image of the most high God? Who, then, is sold but he who, though he was in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal with God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave? For we would not have bought him unless his own had sold him. Badly they sold, worse they bought. They sold to traders; the good fragrance was bought from traitors. For Judah sold, the Ishmaelites bought, who by Latin interpretation are signified as 'those hating their God.' Therefore in one place we find Joseph bought for twenty gold pieces, in another for twenty-five, in another for thirty, because Christ is not worth the same price to all — to some less, to others more. The faith of the buyer is the increase of the goods. To the more devout God is more precious; to the sinner the Redeemer is more precious. He is worth more to one who has more grace; but he is also worth more to one to whom much has been forgiven, because the one to whom more has been forgiven loves more, as the Lord himself declared in the gospel about that woman who poured ointment on his feet, washed them with tears, wiped them with her hair, and dried them with kisses, of whom he said to Simon: 'Therefore I tell you, her many sins are forgiven, because she loved much. But he to whom less is forgiven loves less.' Sometimes the differences of price express not only quantity but also number, as you have in the case of the ointment which the Lord said was poured out for his burial, (as) it is written, Judas saying: 'This could have been sold for three hundred denarii,' in which number not quantity but the signification of the cross seems to be expressed. So here too the difference of twenty or thirty gold or silver pieces gives a sign of a double or triple perfection. For twenty-five gold pieces of the jubilee, which is the number of remission, signify a most precious portion. Here too, so that you may notice the figure of the Lord's passion, the patriarch Judah says: 'Let us hand Joseph over to the Ishmaelites, but let our hands not be laid upon him.' And above he had said well: 'But do not lay hands on him,' which the Jews said at the Lord's passion: 'It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death,' so that the word of Jesus might be fulfilled, signifying by what death he was to die.

Chapter 15

15CSEL 32.2:82–83

iam tunc ergo crucis futurae figurabatur insigne, simul et quod exutus est tunica, id est carne, quam adsumpsit, exutus est decora diuersitate uirtutum. ergo tunica eius, id est caro, non diuinitas cruentata est et indumentum ei carnis, non inmortalitatem uitae auferre potuerunt. hanc tunicam Iudaeicae bestiae cruentauerunt, illae de quibus dicit:

Already then, therefore, the sign of the future cross was figured, and also that he was stripped of his tunic, that is, of the flesh which he took on, stripped of the comely variety of the virtues. So his tunic, that is, the flesh, not the Godhead, was bloodied, and they could take from him the garment of flesh, not the immortality of life. This tunic the beasts of the Jews bloodied, those of whom he says:

Chapter 16

16CSEL 32.2:83

ecce ego mitto uos sicut agnos inter lupos. quod autem lacus siccus erat, quid mirum si Iudaeorum lacus aquam non habet, qui dereliquerunt fontem aquae uiuae et fecerunt sibi contritos lacus? et ut scias uerum hoc esse mysterium, ipse de se dominus ait: posuerunt me in lacu inferiori, in tenebris et in umbra mortis.

'Behold, I send you as lambs among wolves.' As for the cistern being dry, what wonder if the cistern of the Jews has no water, who have forsaken the fountain of living water and made for themselves broken cisterns? And so that you may know that this is truly a mystery, the Lord himself says of himself: 'They put me in the lower pit, in darkness and in the shadow of death.'

Chapter 17

17CSEL 32.2:83–84

Illi igitur emunt Christum, qui bonos odores deferunt, thymiama, quo adolent altaria piae mentis, unde et Dauid graece ait: κατευθυνθήτω ἡ προσευχή μου ὡς θυμίαμα ἐνώπιόν σου, resinam quoque, qua marmora confracta sociantur. est resina spiritalis, quae fracturam animae tuae solidet et diuulsa conectat, resoluta constringat. haec enim spiritalis resina conroborat et quaedam conminuta animae membra conponit, ut sine offensione socientur. denique Hieremias hanc quaerit, ut Babyloniam curet sanare, si possit, dicens: accipite resinam conruptioni eius, si quo modo sanabitur. curauimus Babyloniam, nec sanata est. non est sanata synagoga, quia resina ista migrauit ad ecclesiam. ideo ex Galaad ueniebant negotiatores, hoc est de possessione uel incolatu testimonii merces suas ad ecclesiam transferentes, ut gentium peccata resina ista curaret. de quibus dicitur: conualescite, manus dimissae et genua dissoluta. fides sincera resina est. hanc adhibebat Petrus, cum diceret claudo: in nomine Iesu Christi Nazaraei surge et ambula. meritoque surrexit et ambulauit. hanc habebat, cum diceret paralytico: Aeneas, sanat te dominus Iesus: surge et sterne tibi. et surrexit et strauit sibi. hanc habebat, cum diceret mortuae: surge in nomine domini nostri Iesu Christi. et defuncta surrexit. huius resinae temperamento lapides illi, de quibus potens est deus resuscitare filios Abrahae, conpaginantur. huius resinae medicamento claudus erigitur, paralyticus reformatur, mortua resuscitatur.

Those, then, buy Christ who bring good fragrances, incense, with which they burn the altars of a devout mind — hence David too says in Greek: 'Let my prayer be directed as incense in your sight' — and resin, too, by which broken marbles are joined. There is a spiritual resin which can make firm the fracture of your soul, join what is torn apart, and bind what is loosened. For this spiritual resin strengthens and puts together certain shattered members of the soul, so that they are joined without a flaw. Indeed Jeremiah seeks this, to heal Babylon if he can, saying: 'Take resin for her corruption, if perhaps she may be healed. We cared for Babylon, and she was not healed.' The synagogue was not healed, because this resin passed over to the church. Therefore traders came from Gilead, that is, from the possession or dwelling of testimony, bringing their goods to the church, so that this resin might cure the sins of the nations, of whom it is said: 'Be strong, you slack hands and loosened knees.' Sincere faith is resin. Peter applied it when he said to the lame man: 'In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise and walk.' And rightly he rose and walked. He had it when he said to the paralytic: 'Aeneas, the Lord Jesus heals you: rise and make your bed.' And he rose and made his bed. He had it when he said to the dead woman: 'Rise in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.' And the dead woman rose. By the mixing of this resin those stones are bonded together from which God is able to raise up children to Abraham. By the medicine of this resin the lame is raised, the paralytic restored, the dead woman brought back to life.

Chapter 18

18CSEL 32.2:84

illud quoque quod haedi sanguine resperserunt tunicam eius uidetur significare, quoniam falsis testimoniis adpetentes in inuidiam deduxere peccati omnium peccata donantem. nobis agnus est, illis haedus. nobis agnus dei occisus est, quibus abstulit peccata mundi: illis haedus, quorum aceruauit errores, delicta cumulauit. ideoque ait: inplete mensuram patrum uestrorum. meritoque Iacob posteritatis suae deplorans dispendia quasi pater filium flebat amissum, quasi propheta lugebat interitum Iudaeorum. denique scidit etiam uestimentum suum, quod in passione domini Iesu factum legimus a principe sacerdotum, in quo esset non priuata persona, sed publici munus officii. et uelum templi scissum est, ut profanata mysteria, nudatum populum salutaribus indumentis, diuisum regnum talibus manifestaretur insignibus destruendum, quia omne regnum diuisum facile destruetur. et uere diuisum, quando id quod erat Christi coepit esse iam diaboli. neque enim poterant indiuisi manere qui a patre filium separabant.

That they sprinkled his tunic with a kid's blood seems to signify that, attacking him with false testimonies, they brought into odium of sin him who forgives the sins of all. For us he is a lamb, for them a kid. For us the Lamb of God was slain, for whom he took away the sins of the world; for them a kid, whose errors he heaped up and whose offenses he accumulated. Therefore he says: 'Fill up the measure of your fathers.' And rightly Jacob, deploring the losses of his posterity, wept as a father for a lost son, mourned as a prophet the destruction of the Jews. Indeed he also tore his garment, which we read was done at the passion of the Lord Jesus by the high priest, in whom there was not a private person but the function of a public office. And the veil of the temple was torn, so that by such signs it might be shown that the mysteries were profaned, the people stripped of saving garments, and the kingdom divided, to be destroyed, because every kingdom divided will easily be destroyed. And truly divided, when what was Christ's began now to be the devil's. For those could not remain undivided who separated the Son from the Father.

Chapter 19

19CSEL 32.2:84–86

Uenditus est ergo Ioseph, ductus in Aegyptum, emptus a praeposito coquorum. non otiosa persona, quae cruda ciborum coqueret, ut epularentur animi fidei suauitate; nullus enim cibus scientia et doctrina dulcior. erat ante in Aegypto cruda perfidia, quam nullus diuinae cognitionis ardor et uerae scientiae cupiditas nulla molliuerat, non eloquia domini ignita decocserant. uenditus est autem Ioseph in Aegypto, quia Christus uenturus erat ad eos quibus dictum est: peccatis uestris uenditi estis et ideo suo sanguine redemit quos propria peccata uendiderant. sed uenditus Christus condicionis susceptione, non culpae peccati pretio non tenetur, quia peccatum ipse non fecit. pretio igitur nostrum debitum, non sua aera contraxit, chirographum sustulit, faeneratorem remouit, exuit debitorem: unus exoluit quod ab omnibus debebatur. non licebat nobis exire seruitio. suscepit hoc ille pro nobis, ut seruitutem mundi repelleret, libertatem paradisi restitueret, gratiam nouam consortii sui honore donaret. hoc de mysterio.

Joseph, then, was sold, taken to Egypt, and bought by the chief of the cooks. Not an idle character, one who would cook raw food so that souls might feast on the sweetness of faith; for no food is sweeter than knowledge and teaching. Before, there was in Egypt a raw faithlessness, which no ardor for divine knowledge and no desire for true knowledge had softened, and which the fiery words of the Lord had not cooked. Joseph was sold in Egypt because Christ was to come to those to whom it was said: 'By your sins you were sold,' and therefore he redeemed with his own blood those whom their own sins had sold. But Christ, sold by taking on our condition, not by guilt, is not held by the price of sin, because he himself did no sin. By the price, then, he incurred our debt, not his own; he took away the bond, removed the moneylender, freed the debtor. One paid what was owed by all. We were not allowed to go out of slavery. He took this on for us, to drive back the slavery of the world, restore the freedom of paradise, and bestow new grace by the honor of fellowship with him. So much for the mystery.

Chapter 20

20CSEL 32.2:86–87

ceterum quod ad moralem pertinet locum, quia omnes saluos uult fieri dominus deus noster, dedit etiam per Ioseph his qui sunt in seruitute solacium, adtribuit magisterium, ut discerent etiam in ultima condicione posse mores esse superiores nec ullum statum inmunem esse uirtutis, si animus se uniuscuiusque cognoscat, carnem seruituti subditam esse, non mentem multosque seruulos esse dominis liberiores, si in seruitute positi a seruilibus putent operibus abstinendum. seruile est omne peccatum, libera est innocentia. unde et dominus ait: omnis qui facit peccatum seruus est peccati. quomodo enim non seruus auarus omnis, qui pro exiguo pecuniae lucello se ipsum auctionatur? timet omnia ne congesta amittat qui non utenda congessit, maiore periculo seruaturus quo maiora quaesiuit. quomodo non mendicus cui sunt parua quae possidet? nam etsi mihi diues uideatur, sibi eget, nec testimoniis sua uota solatur qui quod optat nescit credere. quomodo autem non et ille seruus qui subditus libidini est? primum suis ardet incendiis et pectoris sui facibus exuritur. quibus recte dicit propheta: ambulate in lumine ignis uestri et in flamma, quam accendistis. suscipit omnes metus, insidiatur somno singulorum, ut unius cupiditate potiatur, fit seruus omnium. seruit igitur ac miseram quidem seruitutem qui ipse sibi dominos facit, ipse uult habere quos timeat; nihil enim tam speciale seruitutis est quam semper timere. ille uero in quauis condicione seruitii semper liber qui amore non capitur, auaritiae uinculis non tenetur, metu criminis non alligatur, qui securus spectat praesentia, quem futura non terrent. nonne tibi uidetur iste in seruitute dominari, ille autem in libertate seruire? seruiebat Ioseph, regnabat Pharao: beatior huius seruitus quam regnum illius. denique tota Aegyptus conlapsa esset fame, nisi regnum suum consilio seruuli subdidisset.

But as for the moral sense, since the Lord our God wills all to be saved, he gave through Joseph comfort and instruction to those who are in slavery, so that they might learn that even in the lowest condition character can be superior, and that no state is without virtue if each one's soul knows itself: that the flesh is subject to slavery, not the mind, and that many slaves are freer than their masters if, though placed in slavery, they think they must abstain from slavish works. Every sin is slavish; innocence is free. Hence the Lord too says: 'Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin.' For how is not every greedy man a slave, who auctions himself for a petty profit of money? He who has amassed what he will not use fears everything, lest he lose what he has amassed; he will keep it at greater risk the more he has gained. How is he not a beggar to whom what he possesses is small? For even if he seems rich to me, to himself he is needy, and he does not comfort his desires with testimonies, since he does not know how to trust what he wants. And how is he too not a slave who is subject to lust? First he burns with his own fires and is consumed by the torches of his own breast. To these the prophet rightly says: 'Walk in the light of your fire and in the flame you have kindled.' He takes on all fears; he lies in wait for the sleep of individuals, so that to possess one by desire he becomes the slave of all. He serves, then, and a wretched slavery indeed, who makes masters for himself, who wishes to have those he must fear; for nothing is so proper to slavery as always to fear. But he is always free in any condition of servitude who is not captured by love, not held by the chains of avarice, not bound by fear of crime, who looks on the present untroubled and whom the future does not terrify. Does not the one seem to you to rule in slavery, the other to serve in freedom? Joseph served, Pharaoh reigned: the slavery of the one was happier than the kingdom of the other. Indeed all Egypt would have collapsed in famine, had he not subjected his kingdom to the counsel of a slave.

Chapter 21

21CSEL 32.2:87

habent igitur unde glorientur originis seruuli; seruiuit et Ioseph. habent unde se consolentur qui ex libertate in seruitutem aliqua necessitate uenerunt. habent quod imitentur, ut discant condicionem se mutare posse, non mores, esse et in uernaculis libertatem et in seruitute constantiam. habent etiam domini quod per seruulos bonos sperent. Abraham filio per uernaculum inuenit uxorem. benedixit dominus domum Aegyptii propter Ioseph, et facta benedictio domini in toto censu eius et in domo et in agris. et conuertit inquit [ei] omnia quaecumque erant illi in manus Ioseph. aduertimus quod ea quae domini gubernare non poterant seruuli gubernauerunt.

Slaves by origin, then, have something to glory in: Joseph too was a slave. Those who have come from freedom into slavery by some necessity have something to console them. They have something to imitate, so that they may learn that they can change their condition but not their character, that there is freedom even among house-born slaves and constancy in slavery. Masters too have something to hope for from good slaves. Abraham found a wife for his son through a house-born slave. 'The Lord blessed the Egyptian's house because of Joseph, and the blessing of the Lord was on all his property, in the house and in the fields.' 'And he turned over,' it says, 'all that he had into Joseph's hands.' We notice that slaves governed what their masters could not govern.

Chapter 22

22CSEL 32.2:87–88

Sed quid de priuata domo dispositiones eius seruuli adstruam, qui rexit imperium? plus tamen est quod ipse ante se rexit et, cum esset decorus aspectu et speciosus facie ualde, uenustatem sui uultus non ad alienam diriuauit iniuriam, sed ad suam seruauit gratiam, hoc se pulchriorem ratus, si non dispendio castitatis, sed cultu pudoris speciosior probaretur. illum esse uerum decorem, qui non alienos oculos caperet nec fragiles mentes uulneraret, sed iudicia adquireret uniuersorum fraudi nullis futurus, laudi sibi. iam si qua petulantibus aspexit oculis, crimen est solius quae male uidit, non huius qui male nollet uideri, nec in eo quod uisus est culpa est. non erat in potestate seruuli ut non uideretur: maritus debuit cauere uxoris oculos. si ille nihil timebat de coniuge, arbitrabatur iste testimonium esse castimoniae, non remissionem incuriae. discant tamen etiam uiri cauere oculos feminarum; adamantur et qui nolunt amari. denique adamatus est Ioseph, qui amantem contemneret. et bene excusauit eum scriptura dicens: inmisit oculos uxor domini eius in Ioseph, hoc est: non ipse se ostentauit nec cepit incautam, sed illa retia sua misit et indagine sui capta est, laqueos suos sparsit et suis haesit uinculis.

But why should I describe the arrangements of the slave in a private house, when he ruled an empire? Yet it is more that he first ruled himself; and though he was handsome in appearance and very beautiful in face, he did not turn the beauty of his face to the injury of another but kept it for his own grace, thinking himself more beautiful if he were proved more comely not by loss of chastity but by the cultivation of modesty: that that is true beauty which does not capture others' eyes nor wound frail minds, but wins the judgment of all, harmful to none, praiseworthy for himself. If some woman looked at him with wanton eyes, the crime belongs only to her who saw wrongly, not to him who did not wish to be wrongly seen; nor is there guilt in being seen. It was not in the slave's power not to be seen; the husband ought to have guarded his wife's eyes. If he feared nothing regarding his wife, Joseph thought it a testimony to her chastity, not an indulgence of carelessness. Yet let men too learn to beware of the eyes of women; even those who do not wish to be loved are loved. Indeed Joseph was loved, who despised the one who loved him. And Scripture excused him well, saying: 'His master's wife cast her eyes on Joseph,' that is, he did not show himself off nor capture her unawares; she cast her nets and was caught in her own snare, she spread her nooses and stuck in her own bonds.

Chapter 23

23CSEL 32.2:88–89

dixit autem illi: dormi mecum. prima adulterae oculorum tela sunt, secunda, sed qui non capitur oculis potest uerbo resistere. suppetit defensio, ubi adhuc liber affectus est. ideo scriptum est quia ille noluit. primum igitur mentis congressione superauit tamquam scuto animi inruentem repellens, deinde sermonem tamquam hastam uibrauit, ut se illa reuocaret. et dixit uxori domini sui. recte uxor domini, non ipsa domina dicitur, quae non potuit extorquere quod uoluit impetrare. nam quomodo domina, quae dominandi non habebat effectum, quae disciplinam dominae non tenebat, quae seruulis libidinis incentiua praestabat? ille dominus, qui amantis non excepit faces, qui lenocinantis uincula non sensit, quem nulla mortis formido perterruit, qui maluit liber criminis mori quam potentiae criminosae eligere consortium. ille liber qui turpe credidit uicem gratiae non referre. denique non ut meticulosus excusat nec tamquam periculi timidus cauet, sed tamquam beneficii erilis et innocentiae suae debitor fugit crimen ingrati peccatique labem et culpae contagium quasi iustus horrescit. tertium spiculum adultera interpellandi adsiduitate uibrabat. sed Ioseph non audiebat eam. habes post prima uerba quid caueas. non solum lubrica, sed etiam procax inportuna petulans est libido, nec habet quod uereatur adultera. quae dispendia pudoris prima non doluit insidiatur, ut capiat.

And she said to him: 'Sleep with me.' The first darts of the adulteress are her eyes, the second her words; but he who is not captured by the eyes can resist a word. Defense is at hand where the affection is still free. Therefore it is written that he refused. First, then, he overcame by the engagement of the mind, repelling her attack as with the shield of the soul; then he brandished his speech like a spear, so that she might call herself back. 'And he said to his master's wife.' Rightly she is called his master's wife, not his mistress, who could not extort what she wanted to obtain. For how was she mistress, who had no effective power of command, who did not keep a mistress's discipline, who offered slaves incitements to lust? He was master, who did not receive the torches of a lover, did not feel the bonds of a seductress, whom no fear of death terrified, who preferred to die free of crime rather than choose a partnership in criminal power. He was free, who thought it base not to return kindness for kindness. Indeed he does not excuse himself as fearful nor beware as one timid of danger, but as one indebted to his master's kindness and to his own innocence he flees the crime of ingratitude and, as a just man, shudders at the stain of sin and the contagion of guilt. The third dart the adulteress brandished was persistence in pleading. 'But Joseph did not listen to her.' You have what to beware of after the first words. Lust is not only slippery but also shameless, importunate, wanton, and the adulteress has nothing to respect. She who did not grieve at the first losses of modesty lies in wait to capture.

Chapter 24

24CSEL 32.2:89

Denique officii sui et commissi muneris ingressum gratia remotis arbitris ac domesticis adprehendit eum dicens: dormi mecum. excusatur Ioseph scripturae testimonio, quia commissum a domino deserere nequibat obsequium. non enim satis est quod securus sui domus interiora quasi qui capi non posset ingressus est: iustus debuit prouidere, ne furenti copiam daret et eius illa peccato periret. sed qui aduersari sibi domini sui uidebat uxorem neclecti officii etiam a domino cauere debebat offensam. simul adhuc sermonis, non conprehensionis putabat audaciam.

Then, when he went in for the sake of his duty and the task entrusted to him, with witnesses and household removed, she seized him, saying: 'Sleep with me.' Joseph is excused by the testimony of Scripture, because he could not abandon the service entrusted to him by his master. For it was not enough that he went into the inner parts of the house secure about himself, as one who could not be caught; the just man ought to have taken care not to give the frenzied woman an opportunity, lest she perish by his sin. But one who saw that his master's wife was against him ought also to have guarded against offending his master by neglecting his duty. At the same time he still thought hers a boldness of words, not of seizing.

Chapter 25

25CSEL 32.2:89–91

excusatur quod ingressus est, praedicatur quod elapsus est nec pluris fecit uestimenta corporis quam animi castimoniam. reliquit tamquam non sua quae adultera suis manibus detinebat et aliena iudicauit quae tactu inpudicae potuerant conprehendi. magnus tamen uir, qui uenditus seruile nesciuit ingenium, adamatus non redamauit, rogatus non adquieuit, conprehensus aufugit, qui cum ab uxore domini conueniretur, teneri ueste potuit, non potuit animo capi ac ne ipsa uerba diu quidem passus contagium iudicauit, si diutius moraretur, ne per manus adulterae libidinis incentiua transirent. itaque uestem exuit, crimen excussit et relictis quibus tenebatur exuuiis spoliatus quidem, sed non nudus aufugit, quia erat tectior indumento pudoris; non est enim nudus nisi quem culpa nudauerit. denique in superioribus habemus quod Adam, posteaquam dei mandata praeuaricatione deseruit et peccati grauis aera contracxit, nudus erat. unde et ipse ait: uocem tuam audiui in paradiso et timui, quia nudus sum, et abscondi me. intellexit enim esse se nudum, qui infulas diuinae protectionis amiserat. et ideo latebat, quia uestem fidei non habebat, quam utique praeuaricando deposuit. magnam rem uides. ille nudus erat, qui tunicam non amisit: iste nudus non erat, qui uestimentis se exuit, quae in manibus adulterae dereliquit. eadem scriptura illum nudum adseruit, hunc abnuit. et ideo expoliauit iste se potius quam nudauit, qui incorrupta uirtutum uestimenta seruabat, expolians se ueterem hominem cum actibus eius, ut indueret nouum. qui secundum imaginem creatoris in agnitione renouatur: ille autem nudus remansit, qui se iterum uestire non potuit singulari spolio uirtutis exutus. unde pelliciam accepit tunicam, quia peccator habere non poterat spiritalem. reliquit igitur uestimenta Ioseph et nudauit adulterae inuerecundiam, quae postea latere non potuit.

He is excused for going in; he is praised for slipping away, and he did not value the garments of the body more than the chastity of the soul. He left behind as not his own what the adulteress held in her hands, and judged as another's what could be grasped by the touch of a shameless woman. A great man indeed, who when sold knew nothing of a slave's character, when loved did not love in return, when asked did not consent, when seized fled; who, when accosted by his master's wife, could be held by his garment but could not be captured in soul; and he judged it a contagion to endure even her words for long, if he stayed longer, lest the incitements of lust pass through the adulteress's hands. So he put off his garment, shook off the crime, and, leaving behind the spoils by which he was held, fled stripped indeed but not naked, because he was better covered by the garment of modesty; for no one is naked except one whom guilt has stripped. Indeed in the earlier passages we have that Adam, after he deserted the commandments of God by transgression and contracted the debt of grave sin, was naked. Hence he too says: 'I heard your voice in paradise and was afraid, because I am naked, and I hid myself.' For he understood that he was naked, who had lost the insignia of divine protection. And therefore he hid, because he did not have the garment of faith, which surely he put off by transgressing. You see a great thing: the one was naked who did not lose his tunic; this one was not naked who put off the garments which he left in the adulteress's hands. The same Scripture declared the one naked and denied it of the other. And therefore this man stripped himself rather than became naked, keeping the incorrupt garments of the virtues, stripping off the old man with his deeds to put on the new, which is renewed in knowledge according to the image of the creator; but the other remained naked, who could not clothe himself again, stripped of the unique spoil of virtue. Hence he received a tunic of skin, because a sinner could not have a spiritual one. So Joseph left his garments and laid bare the shamelessness of the adulteress, which afterward could not be hidden.

Chapter 26

26CSEL 32.2:91

Denique exiuit foras et ipsa adulterii sui temptamenta uulgauit exaltans uocem suam, eo quod relictis uestibus Hebraeus aufugerat. ipsa igitur quod debuerat celare prodebat, ut conposito crimine laederet innocentem. iustus autem accusare non nouit et ideo inpune hoc inpudica faciebat. illam igitur uere exutam dixerim, etiam aliena uestimenta seruantem. quae omnia amiserat uelamina castitatis, illum satis ornatum. satis defensum, cuius uox non audiebatur et innocentia loquebatur. sic Susanna postea, dum tacet in iudicio, melius est locuta oraculo et ideo prophetae meruit defensionem, quae propriae uocis non quaesiuit auxilium. illum ergo beatiorem dixerim, cum in carcerem mitteretur, quia subibat pro castitate martyrium. bonum enim munus pudicitia, sed minoris meriti, cum periculum non habet; ubi uero etiam salutis periculo defenditur, ibi plenius coronatur. inaudita causa, inexplorata fide ueri tamquam reus criminis in carcerem Ioseph mittitur, sed eum dominus nec in carcere deserebat. non turbentur innocentes, cum falsis criminibus adpetuntur, cum oppressa iustitia truduntur in carcerem.

Then she went out of doors and herself published the attempts of her adultery, raising her voice, because the Hebrew had fled, leaving his garments. So she herself betrayed what she ought to have concealed, so as to injure an innocent man by a fabricated crime. But the just man did not know how to accuse, and therefore the shameless woman did this with impunity. I would say that she was truly the one stripped, even while she kept another's garments, she who had lost all the coverings of chastity; and that he was well enough adorned, well enough defended, whose voice was not heard but whose innocence spoke. So later Susanna, while she was silent at the trial, spoke better by an oracle, and therefore deserved the prophet's defense, she who did not seek the help of her own voice. I would call him happier, then, when he was sent to prison, because he was undergoing martyrdom for chastity. For modesty is a good gift, but of less merit when it involves no danger; but where it is defended even at the risk of one's life, there it is crowned more fully. With the case unheard and the truth unexamined, Joseph is sent to prison as though guilty of the crime; but the Lord did not desert him even in prison. Let the innocent not be troubled when they are attacked with false charges, when justice is crushed and they are thrust into prison.

Chapter 27

27CSEL 32.2:91–92

uisitat deus et in carcere suos, et ideo ibi plus est auxilii, ubi plus periculi. sed quid mirum si uisitat Christus in carcere positos, qui ipsum se in suis in carcere clausum esse memorauit, sicut habes scriptum: in carcere eram, et non uenistis ad me? quo non penetrat diuina misericordia? inuenit Ioseph huiusmodi gratiam, ut qui fuerat clausus in carcere ipse potius carceris claustra seruaret, cederet munere clauicularius, inclusos omnes potestati eius committeret. itaque non solum Ioseph carcerem non sentiebat, sed etiam alios quoque carceris leuabat aerumna.

God visits his own even in prison, and therefore there is more help where there is more danger. But what wonder if Christ visits those placed in prison, who said that he himself was shut up in prison in his own, as you have it written: 'I was in prison, and you did not come to me'? Where does the divine mercy not penetrate? Joseph found such grace that he who had been shut up in prison himself rather kept the bars of the prison: the keeper of the keys gave up his office to him and entrusted all the prisoners to his authority. So not only did Joseph not feel the prison, but he even relieved others of the hardship of prison.

Chapter 28

28CSEL 32.2:92

Huius igitur iniuriae auctor mulier et spadones sunt: sed mulier est Aegyptiarum, quae procaces cum uiris solent miscere sermones, lacessere uerecundos, refugientes insequi, pudentes perurguere. cum uitia sua non posset defendere, innoxios criminabatur perfidiam admiscens perfidiae, aliena tenens, alios ipsa condemnans, modum nullum ponens furori. quae enim causa crudelitatis nisi quod cupiditatibus suis obsisti uidebat et desideria sua uetita adsensione fraudari? en propter quod aperiatur carcer, ut suscipiat innocentes, soluantur catenae reis, ut inponantur fidelibus, dimittantur ueritatis adulteri, ut includatur qui adulterium fidei recusauit.

The authors of this injury, then, were a woman and eunuchs. But the woman is of the Egyptian women, who are accustomed to mix wanton talk with men, to provoke the modest, to pursue those who flee, to press hard on the bashful. Since she could not defend her own vices, she accused the innocent, adding treachery to treachery, holding what was another's, herself condemning others, setting no limit to her fury. For what was the cause of her cruelty but that she saw her desires opposed and her longings cheated by refused consent? Behold why the prison is opened to receive the innocent, why chains are loosed from the guilty to be put on the faithful, why the adulterers of truth are let go so that he may be shut up who refused the adultery of faith.

Chapter 29

29CSEL 32.2:92–94

de istis uero spadonibus quid dicam? qui exemplo debent esse spadonibus ceteris quod status eorum fragilis et tenuis et in uoluntate regia spes omnis quibus leuis offensa summum periculum sit, secundae autem res uile ministerium. gloriabatur alter quod esset uini praepositus, alter quod pistorum. uterque offendit missique in carcerem et conmendati sancto Ioseph ab ipso carceris clauiculario, cum essent illic dies complures, uiderunt somnium. et cum reuiseret eos Ioseph, tristes turbatosque animi offendit, quia turbabantur somnio, cuius interpretem non inuenirent. nonne per deum inquit interpretatio somnii est? narrate ergo mihi. et narrauit praepositus uini somnium suum: erat uitis in conspectu meo, in uite autem tres radices et ipsa florens, ferens germina, maturi et butrones uuarum et calix Pharao in manu mea. et sumpsi eam et expressi eam in calicem et dedi calicem in manus Pharao. et dixit illi Ioseph: tres radices tres dies sunt. adhuc triduum, et in mentem habebit Pharao principatum tuum et restituet te super officium tuum pristinum et dabis calicem in manus Pharao. sed memor esto per temet ipsum, cum tibi bene erit, et facies in me misericordiam et memor eris mei ad Pharao et educes me de carcere isto, quia furto inuolatus sum de terra Hebraeorum et hic nihil mali feci, sed miserunt me in lacum carceris huius.

And what shall I say of those eunuchs? They ought to be an example to other eunuchs, because their state is fragile and slight, and all their hope lies in the king's will; a slight offense is the greatest danger to them, and their prosperity a mean service. One boasted that he was in charge of the wine, the other of the bakers. Both gave offense and were sent to prison, and were entrusted to holy Joseph by the keeper of the prison himself; and when they had been there many days, they saw a dream. And when Joseph visited them again, he found them sad and troubled in mind, because they were troubled by a dream for which they found no interpreter. 'Is not the interpretation of a dream through God?' he said. 'Tell it to me, then.' And the one in charge of the wine told his dream: 'There was a vine before me, and on the vine three roots, and it was flowering, putting forth shoots, ripe clusters of grapes, and Pharaoh's cup was in my hand. And I took it and pressed it into the cup and gave the cup into Pharaoh's hands.' And Joseph said to him: 'The three roots are three days. Within three days Pharaoh will remember your office and will restore you to your former office, and you will give the cup into Pharaoh's hands. But remember me yourself when it is well with you, and show me mercy, and remember me to Pharaoh, and bring me out of this prison; for I was stolen by theft from the land of the Hebrews, and here I have done nothing evil, but they cast me into the pit of this prison.'

Chapter 30

30CSEL 32.2:94–95

alterius somnium non libet dicere. meministis certe uerborum meorum, quod etiam tunc refugerim eius interpretationem in eo, cuius exitum refugio, mortem horresco. de isto prius dicamus, qui sibi beatus uidebatur, cum esset uini praepositus, et hunc summum credebat apicem omnis potentiae, quod regi calicem dabat. haec gloria illius, haec magnificentia in hoc saeculo: hac defraudatus dolebat, huic redditus gratulabatur. sed hoc somnium est et omnis potentia saeculi somnium, non ueritas est. denique per somnium uidit reddi sibi principatum suum. et Esaias dicit ita esse huiusmodi homines, qui in hoc saeculo delectantur rebus secundis. sicut qui in somnis manducat et bibit uidetur sibi cibo aut potu, dum dormit, repleri, sed cum uigilauerit, incipit esurire amplius — tunc intellegit quam inanis ille cibus et potus fuerit somniantis —: sic qui in hoc dormit saeculo nec oculos aperit ad mysteria diuina, quamdiu somno grauatur corporis, putat alicuius momenti esse hanc saecularem potentiam — quasi in somnis eam uidet — ubi euigilauerit, deprehendit quam inanis huius uoluptas saeculi sit.

I do not care to speak of the other's dream. You certainly remember my words, that even then I avoided its interpretation in that man, whose end I avoid, whose death I shudder at. Let us speak first of this one, who thought himself happy because he was in charge of the wine and believed it the highest summit of all power that he gave the king his cup. This was his glory, this his magnificence in this world: deprived of it he grieved, restored to it he rejoiced. But this is a dream, and all the power of the world is a dream, not truth. Indeed he saw in a dream his office restored to him. And Isaiah says that such are the men who delight in prosperity in this world: just as one who eats and drinks in his sleep seems to himself to be filled with food or drink while he sleeps, but when he wakes begins to be hungrier — then he understands how empty the dreamer's food and drink were — so one who sleeps in this world and does not open his eyes to the divine mysteries thinks, as long as he is weighed down by the sleep of the body, that this worldly power is of some moment, seeing it as in a dream; when he wakes, he discovers how empty the pleasure of this world is.

Chapter 31

31CSEL 32.2:95

Considera nunc illum uerum Hebraeum, illum non somnii, sed ueritatis et praeclarae uisionis interpretem, qui de illa diuinitatis plenitudine ac libertate caelestis gratiae in hunc corporeum carcerem uenerit, quem non potuit saeculi huius inlecebra mutare, non ulla corruptela mundanae uoluptatis euertere, qui temptatus non decidit, adpetitus non adpetiuit, postremo adulterina quadam synagogae manu ueste corporis adprehensus carnem exuit, liber mortis ascendit. calumniata est meretrix, ubi eum tenere non potuit, quem non carcer terruit. non inferna tenuerunt. quin etiam quo ueluti puniendus descenderat, inde alios liberauit:

Consider now that true Hebrew, the interpreter not of a dream but of truth and of a glorious vision, who from that fullness of divinity and freedom of heavenly grace came into this bodily prison; whom the enticement of this world could not change nor any corruption of worldly pleasure overthrow; who when tempted did not fall, when desired did not desire; and finally, seized by the garment of the body by a kind of adulterous hand of the synagogue, he put off the flesh and ascended free of death. The harlot slandered him when she could not hold him, whom prison did not terrify, whom hell did not hold. Indeed, from the place to which he had descended as though to be punished, he freed others:

Chapter 32

32CSEL 32.2:95–96

ubi ipsi stringebantur mortis uincula, ibi laxauit ipse uincula mortuorum. considera ergo istum Hebraeum dicentem illi praeposito spadonum, qui contraxerat offensam regiam, quem restituerat muneri suo: memor esto per temet ipsum. cum tibi bene erit, et facies in me misericordiam et memor eris mei. ideo secundo repetiuit, quia sciebat non recordaturum quid euasisset iniuriae, cum potentiam recepisset. ideo secundo admonuit, quia secundo liberauit, ut si prioris beneficii eum memoria non teneret, uel posterioris subiret, non despiceret auctorem salutis suae, non perfida praeuaricatione uiolaret. sed quod peius est, cito beneficii inrepit obliuio rebus secundis. redditus officio suo non est memor factus interpretis, sed oblitus est eum. sed etsi ille obliuiscebatur, Christus non obliuiscebatur, sed loquebatur ei et per seruulum loquebatur dicens ad eum: memor esto per temet ipsum, hoc est uel officii tui contemplatione quid audieris recordare. sed etsi nunc oblitus es, memor eris mei, ut euadas periculum, qui oblitus es beneficium. tamen elatus potentia non recordabatur. et quanta haec potentia, ubi uini ministerium? en unde omnis iactantia! quia erat spadonum praepositus, qui uinum poculis regiis ministrabant.

where the bonds of death were being tightened on him, there he loosened the bonds of the dead. Consider, then, this Hebrew saying to that chief of the eunuchs who had incurred the king's displeasure, whom he had restored to his office: 'Remember me yourself when it is well with you, and show me mercy, and remember me.' He repeated it a second time because he knew that the man would not remember what injury he had escaped once he had regained his power. He admonished him a second time because he had freed him a second time, so that if the memory of the first kindness did not hold him, at least that of the later one might occur to him, and he would not despise the author of his safety nor violate him by faithless betrayal. But what is worse, forgetfulness of a kindness quickly creeps in with prosperity. Restored to his office, he did not remember the interpreter but forgot him. But even if he forgot, Christ did not forget, but spoke to him, and spoke through the slave, saying to him: 'Remember yourself,' that is, at least in consideration of your office, recall what you have heard. But even if you have forgotten now, you will remember me, so that you may escape danger, you who have forgotten the kindness. Yet, elated by power, he did not remember. And how great is this power, where the service is of wine? Behold the source of all boasting: that he was chief of the eunuchs who served wine in the royal cups.

Chapter 33

33CSEL 32.2:96

Et factum est inquit post biennium. mentior de hoc nostri spadonis tempore, nisi et dies conuenit, quia post biennium recepit officium nec recordatus est, sed admonitus. cognouit enim quod etiam regnum ipsum in hoc saeculo esset somnium qui suo somnio non credidit. didicit etiam regum.... esse somnia nec ipsorum potestates esse perpetuas. sed cito hunc locum praetereat dolor. ne ipsa commemoratione crudescat; ne ipsius quidem sermonis mei meminisse delectat, quem tunc temporis uel effuderit dolor uel extorserit ecclesiae contumelia.

'And it came to pass,' it says, 'after two years.' The time agrees with our eunuch, even to the day, or I am lying, since after two years he recovered his office and did not remember, but was reminded. For he who did not believe his own dream learned that even a kingdom in this world is a dream. He learned also that the … of kings are dreams and that their powers are not everlasting. But let grief pass this place quickly, lest it grow raw again by the very mention; nor does it please me to remember even my own speech, which at that time either grief poured out or an insult to the church extorted.

Chapter 34

34CSEL 32.2:96–97

admonitus ergo sui per somnium regis ait: peccatum meum recordor. sera quidem ista est, sed utinam uera confessio. post peccatum fateris quod ante peccatum cauere debueras. quam cito oblitus fueras memor esto mei. scis nempe tunc temporis hunc fuisse sermonem, sed obtunsas aures habebas fastu potentiae et uini ebrius non audiebas uerba sobrietatis. uel nunc memor esto mei, qui peccatum sero fateris. qui rogas seruulum cur dominum negas? inebriare iam non uino, sed sancto spiritu. recordare quid passus sit, cum quo dormisti somnum tuum et somniasti somnium. et ipse praepositus erat et praepositus epularum regis, quae ad opus pistorium pertinebant. sublimem se esse credebat, quia in potestate habebat panem regium: nesciebat multos anfractus esse huius potentiae. minabatur aliis ipse mox supplicio dedendus extremo nec audiuit eum, qui licet seruulus domini tamen loquebatur oraculum, quod ipsius iussu regis, de quo sibi plurimum blandiebatur, caput amissurus esset,. esca auibus derelinquendus. uel hoc te exemplum reuocare debebat, ut perfidiae non crederes.

Reminded, then, by the king's dream, he says: 'I remember my sin.' Late indeed is this confession, but would that it were true! After the sin you confess what you ought to have guarded against before the sin. How quickly you had forgotten 'Remember me'! You know surely that this was the saying at that time, but you had ears dulled by the pride of power, and drunk with wine you did not hear the words of sobriety. At least now remember me, you who confess your sin late. You who ask the slave, why do you deny the master? Be drunk now not with wine but with the Holy Spirit. Remember what happened to the one with whom you slept your sleep and dreamed your dream. He too was a chief, and chief of the king's food that belonged to the baker's work. He thought himself exalted because he had the king's bread in his power; he did not know that this power has many twists. He threatened others, though he himself was soon to be handed over to the ultimate punishment; nor did he listen to him who, though a slave, still spoke the oracle of the Lord: that by the order of that very king in whom he so greatly flattered himself he would lose his head and be left as food for the birds. At least this example ought to have called you back, so that you would not trust faithlessness.

Chapter 35

35CSEL 32.2:97

sunt et alia exempla de fastu et fragilitate ministrorum regalium, quae posterioris temporis historia habet. et Doec praepositus erat et praepositus regis animalium ad disciplinam mulorum, hoc est spadonum animalium. hic quoque sacerdotem domini detulit et regem fraude conmouit in sacerdotis periculum et hic Syrus erat. num mentior, quando et patria et facta conueniunt? Aman quoque a cubiculo regis et ipse praepositus, dum inuadere ecclesias domini inproba temeritate contendit populumque fidelem spoliare ac persequi, grauibus sacrilegia suppliciis expendit.

There are other examples too of the pride and fragility of royal ministers, which the history of later times has. Doeg too was a chief, chief of the king's animals for the training of the mules, that is, eunuch animals. He too denounced the priest of the Lord and by fraud stirred up the king to the priest's danger, and he too was a Syrian. Am I lying, when both country and deeds agree? Haman too, the king's chamberlain and himself a chief, while he strove with wicked boldness to invade the churches of the Lord and to despoil and persecute the faithful people, paid for his sacrileges with grave punishments.

Chapter 36

36CSEL 32.2:97–98

Sed reuertamur ad istum uini praepositum, qui quasi multo ebrius mero beneficii auctorem oblitus est diu, aliquando tamen, ut regi prouideret interpretem, non quasi gratus, sed quasi callidus intimauit seriem rei gestae. quo cognito rex quoque eum iussit arcessiri erutumque de carcere interrogauit, si posset interpretari sibi somnium. cuius explanatione delectatus remouit iniuriam, honorem detulit. itaque uidete si non praesentibus et ista conueniunt. iniuria inlata est prius quam cognosceretur a rege, gratia relata, ubi regi est cognitus. ita rex uacat culpa, quia et id quod excepit uir sanctus iniuriae alienum fuit et id quod recepit gratiae regis est proprium.

But let us return to this chief of the wine, who, as though drunk with much wine, long forgot the author of his kindness; yet at length, to provide the king with an interpreter, not as one grateful but as one shrewd, he made known the sequence of events. When the king learned it, he ordered Joseph to be summoned, and, when he had been brought out of prison, asked him if he could interpret his dream. Delighted with his explanation, he removed the injury and conferred honor. So see whether these things do not fit the present too. The injury was inflicted before he was known to the king; favor was returned when he became known to the king. So the king is free of guilt, because both the injury the holy man received was foreign to him, and the favor he received belongs to the king.

Chapter 37

37CSEL 32.2:98–99

somnium autem et eius interpretatio huiusmodi est: quaecumque inquit facit deus ostendit Pharao. septem uaccae bonae septem anni sunt, et septem spicae bonae septem anni sunt. somnium Pharao unum est. et septem uaccae macrae, quae ascendebant post illas, septem anni sunt, et septem spicae macrae et a uento corruptae septem anni sunt. erit septem annis famis. uerbum autem quod dixi quaecumque deus facit ostendit Pharao, ecce septem anni ueniunt ubertatis magnae in totam terram Aegypti; uenient autem septem anni famis post haec et obliuiscentur ubertatem in tota Aegypto. et consumet famis totam terram et non agnoscetur ubertas terrae a fame, quae futura est post haec; ualida enim nimium. quod autem iterauit somnium Pharao bis, quia uerum erit uerbum a deo et festinabit deus facere illud.

The dream and its interpretation are these: 'Whatever God does,' he says, 'he has shown to Pharaoh. The seven good cows are seven years, and the seven good ears are seven years; Pharaoh's dream is one. And the seven lean cows that came up after them are seven years, and the seven lean ears blasted by the wind are seven years; there will be seven years of famine. As for the word I spoke, whatever God does he has shown to Pharaoh: behold, seven years of great plenty are coming throughout all the land of Egypt; but seven years of famine will come after these, and they will forget the plenty in all Egypt. And the famine will consume all the land, and the plenty of the land will not be known because of the famine that will come after this; for it will be very severe. And that the dream was repeated to Pharaoh twice is because the word from God will be true, and God will hasten to do it.'

Chapter 38

38CSEL 32.2:99

Uetus somnium, res recentes. posterioribus priora consumpta sunt et ubi erat ante ubertatis copia, ibi rerum omnium facta est indigentia. quod si quis huiusmodi consilium regi dedisset, ut aliquid de superiori ubertate posteriori principatus sui seruaret aetati, reliquo quoque tempori larga donandi affluentia redundasset. sed inmodica aeui superioris effusio etiam posteriora destituit et homines diripientes uniuersa aliquem Ioseph adhibere nolebant. etsi non ego Ioseph — quis enim istud? —, clamabam tamen uaccas illas pinguis non solum lasciuiam, sed etiam incuriam diuinae significare reuerentiae — de perfidis enim dictum est: tauri pingues obsederunt me et de Iudaeorum populo scriptum est: inpinguatus et obesus factus est et dilatatus est et dereliquit deum, qui fecit eum — et ideo somnium illud redundantiae saecularis perpetuum esse non posse: fore tempus, quo his famis dura succederet.

An old dream, recent events. The earlier things were consumed by the later, and where before there was abundance of plenty, there arose a want of all things. But if anyone had given the king such advice, to keep something of the former plenty for the later age of his rule, the remaining time too would have overflowed with a lavish abundance for giving. But the immoderate squandering of the former age left the later times destitute as well, and men plundering everything were unwilling to employ any Joseph. Even if I am not Joseph — for who would claim that? — still I cried out that those fat cows signified not only wantonness but also neglect of reverence for God — for it is said of the faithless: 'Fat bulls have beset me,' and of the people of the Jews it is written: 'He grew fat and thick and broad, and forsook God who made him' — and that therefore that dream of worldly abundance could not be everlasting: there would come a time when harsh famine would follow on these things.

Chapter 39

39CSEL 32.2:99–100

nec tamen hoc somnium uni aut duobus demonstratum arbitror, sed omnibus propositum, eo quod septem anni istius mundi pingues et saeculari ubertate opimi absorbeantur ab illis saeculis, quae futura sunt, in quibus perpetua quies et legis obseruantia spiritalis, quam Ephraem illa tribus patrum deo fructuosa custodiat, bona uacca, non illa corporeo distenta ubere, sed abundans spiritalis lactis et gratiae, super cuius decorem ceruicis deus sedere se dicit, ut scriptum est: Ephraem uacca docta diligere uictoriam. ego autem transiui super decorem ceruicis eius. non ergo inpinguet caput nostrum oleum peccatoris nec falsi fructus delectare nos debent, ne dicatur et de nobis: seminastis inpietatem et iniquitates eius uindemiastis. manducasti fructum falsum, quia sperasti in curribus tuis. nec me mouet quod habet spicas macras et uento corruptas, quia et Dauid tum melior erat, quando sicut aranea tabescebat, et spiritus contribulatus sacrificium dei est et illi praestantiores euadunt quos in hoc saeculo grauibus iniuriis spiritus malignus exercuit.

Yet I do not think this dream was shown to one or two, but set before all: that the seven fat years of this world, rich with worldly plenty, are swallowed up by the ages to come, in which there will be everlasting rest and the spiritual observance of the law, which that tribe of the fathers, Ephraim, fruitful to God, may keep — a good cow, not swollen with a bodily udder but abounding in spiritual milk and grace, on the beauty of whose neck God says that he sits, as it is written: 'Ephraim is a trained heifer that loves victory, but I passed over the beauty of her neck.' Let not the oil of the sinner, then, anoint our head, nor should false fruits delight us, lest it be said of us too: 'You have sown ungodliness and harvested its iniquities; you have eaten false fruit, because you trusted in your chariots.' Nor does it trouble me that it has lean ears blasted by the wind, because David too was better then, when he wasted away like a spider, and 'a troubled spirit is a sacrifice to God,' and those come out more excellent whom the evil spirit has exercised in this world with grave injuries.

Chapter 40

40CSEL 32.2:100–101

unde magis mystica meruisse praemia Ioseph arbitror, quia de mysticis est locutus. quid enim sibi uult anulus digito eius insertus nisi ut intellegamus pontificatum ei fidei esse delatum, ut alios ipse signaret? quid stola, quae amictus est sapientiae, nisi tributum ei ab illo rege caelesti prudentiae principatum? torques aureus intellectum bonum uidetur exprimere; currus quoque significat fastigium sublime meritorum. quis autem est qui ex gentibus accepit uxorem nisi qui ecclesiam sibi ex nationibus congregauit et suscepit ex ea filium Manassem, per quem oblitus est omnes dolores suos, quos habuit de sacrilegiis Iudaeorum? suscepit alium quoque filium Ephraem, per cuius profectum claruit quod suscepta in carne humilitas et diuinitatem non humiliauit et cumulauit gloriam.

Hence I think Joseph deserved more mystical rewards, because he spoke of mystical things. For what does the ring put on his finger mean but that we should understand that the high priesthood of faith was conferred on him, so that he himself might seal others? What does the robe, the garment of wisdom, mean but that the primacy of prudence was granted him by that heavenly king? The golden necklace seems to express good understanding; the chariot too signifies the lofty summit of merits. And who is it who took a wife from the gentiles but he who gathered a church for himself from the nations and received from her a son, Manasseh, through whom he forgot all the sorrows he had over the sacrileges of the Jews? He received another son too, Ephraim, through whose progress it became clear that the humility taken on in the flesh did not humble the divinity but heaped up glory.

Chapter 41

41CSEL 32.2:101

Denique quicumque famem patiebantur ad Ioseph mittebantur. qui sunt isti nisi de quibus dictum est: conuertentur ad uesperam et famem patientur ut canes? erat autem fames non unius loci, sed totius terrae, quia non erat qui faceret bonitatem. ideo dominus Iesus ieiunia mundana miseratus aperuit horrea sua et mysteriorum caelestium thensauros scientiae sapientiaeque patefecit absconditos. ut nulli alimenta deessent. dixit enim Sapientia: uenite edite panes meos, et ideo ab illo solo dicitur: dominus pascit me, et nihil mihi deerit qui saturatur a Christo. aperuit ergo horrea sua Christus et uendebat non aera pecuniae, sed fidei pretium et deuotionis stipendium quaerens. uendebat autem non paucis in Iudaea, sed uendebat omnibus, ut ab uniuersis nationibus crederetur.

Then whoever suffered famine was sent to Joseph. Who are these but those of whom it is said: 'They will return at evening and suffer hunger like dogs'? And the famine was not of one place but of the whole earth, because there was none who did good. Therefore the Lord Jesus, pitying the world's fasts, opened his granaries and laid open the hidden treasures of knowledge and wisdom of the heavenly mysteries, so that no one should lack nourishment. For Wisdom has said: 'Come, eat my bread,' and therefore it is said by him alone who is filled by Christ: 'The Lord feeds me, and I shall lack nothing.' Christ, then, opened his granaries and sold, seeking not the bronze of money but the price of faith and the wage of devotion. And he sold not to a few in Judea, but to all, so that he might be believed by all nations.

Chapter 42

42CSEL 32.2:101–102

et omnes regiones uenerunt in Aegyptum ad Ioseph emere; optinuerat enim fames. omnes enim esuriunt quos non pauerit Christus. emamus ergo alimenta, quibus famem possimus repellere. nemo paupertatis suae contemplatione reuocetur, nemo uereatur qui argentum non habet. non quaerit Christus argentum, sed fidem, quae argento pretiosior est. denique emit eum Petrus, qui non habebat argentum. argentum inquit et aurum non habeo, sed quod habeo do tibi. in nomine Christi Iesu surge et ambula. et propheta Esaias dicit: qui sititis ite ad aquam et quicumque non habetis argentum ite emite et bibite et manducate sine argento et pretio uini. neque enim pretium quaesiuit a nobis qui pro nobis sanguinis sui pretium soluit, quia non auro et argento, sed pretioso nos redemit sanguine. ergo id pretium debes, quo emptus es. etsi ille non semper exigat, tu tamen debes. eme igitur tibi Christum non eo quod pauci habent, sed eo quod omnes habent per naturam, pauci offerunt per timorem. suum est quod a te Christus reposcit. ipse uitam omnibus dedit, ipse pro omnibus mortem suam optulit. solue pro auctore quod soluturus es lege. non mediocris iste contractus est, non omnes eum facile uident. denique illae uirgines in euangelio, quas ueniens sponsus exclusit, ideo foris relictae sunt, quia uenale oleum non emerunt. unde dicitur his: ite potius ad uendentes et emite uobis. et negotiator non inmerito praedicatur, qui uendidit omnia sua et emit margaritam.

'And all countries came to Egypt to Joseph to buy; for the famine had prevailed.' For all hunger whom Christ has not fed. Let us buy, then, food with which we can drive away hunger. Let no one be held back by consideration of his poverty, let no one who has no silver be afraid. Christ does not seek silver but faith, which is more precious than silver. Indeed Peter, who had no silver, bought him. 'Silver and gold,' he says, 'I have not, but what I have I give you: in the name of Jesus Christ rise and walk.' And the prophet Isaiah says: 'You who thirst, go to the water, and whoever has no silver, go, buy and drink and eat without silver and without price of wine.' For he who paid the price of his blood for us did not seek a price from us, because he redeemed us not with gold and silver but with precious blood. So you owe the price with which you were bought. Even if he does not always exact it, still you owe it. Buy Christ for yourself, then, not with what few have, but with what all have by nature and few offer through fear. What Christ asks back from you is his own. He gave life to all; he offered his death for all. Pay for the author what you will pay by law. This is no small contract, and not all easily see it. Indeed those virgins in the gospel whom the bridegroom shut out when he came were left outside because they did not buy the oil for sale. Hence it is said to them: 'Go rather to those who sell and buy for yourselves.' And the merchant is rightly praised who sold all he had and bought the pearl.

Chapter 43

43CSEL 32.2:102–103

Et Iacob dixit filiis suis: quare pigri estis? ecce audiui quia est frumentum in Aegypto. descendite illo et emite nobis escas. non semel hoc Iacob dixit, cotidie omnibus filiis suis dicit, qui serius ueniunt ad gratiam Christi: quare pigri estis? ecce audiui quia est frumentum in Aegypto. ex hoc frumento granum est quod resurgit.

'And Jacob said to his sons: Why are you idle? Behold, I have heard that there is grain in Egypt. Go down there and buy food for us.' Jacob did not say this once; daily he says to all his sons who come late to the grace of Christ: 'Why are you idle? Behold, I have heard that there is grain in Egypt.' Of this grain is the seed that rises again.

Chapter 44

44CSEL 32.2:103

qui igitur famem sustinet suae segnitiae debet adscribere. ecce inquit audiui quia est frumentum in Aegypto. citius utique iuniores aliquid quam seniores audire consuerunt, dum foris positi multi circumeunt. sed hanc negotiationem prius senex audit, sed ille senex, in quo est fidei longaeua canities, prior senex intellegit, senex, in quo uenerabilis est senectus et aetas senectutis uita inmaculata. nec omnes hanc negotiationem suscipiunt nisi filii Iacob et ipsi prouectioris aetatis. ideo decem pergunt, non pergit iunior. non misit eum pater, ne contingat inquit eum infirmitas. adhuc obnoxius erat infirmitate Beniamin iunior. patriarcha quidem legitur Beniamin, sed ille ex tribu Beniamin Paulus praefigurabatur. merito Iacob de eius infirmitate dubitabat. denique infirmatus est, ut sanaretur: caecitatem passus est, sed haec infirmitas ad salutem. denique illa caecitas lucem adtulit. accepimus historiam, cognoscamus mysterium.

Whoever endures famine, then, must ascribe it to his own sluggishness. 'Behold,' he says, 'I have heard that there is grain in Egypt.' Young men usually hear something sooner than old men, since many of them go about outside. But the old man hears of this trade first — but that old man in whom there is the long gray hair of faith; the old man understands first, the old man in whom old age is venerable and the age of old age is a spotless life. Nor do all undertake this trade, but only the sons of Jacob, and they of more advanced age. So ten go; the youngest does not go. His father did not send him, 'lest,' he says, 'weakness befall him.' Benjamin the youngest was still liable to weakness. We read of the patriarch Benjamin, but Paul, of the tribe of Benjamin, was being prefigured. Rightly Jacob had doubts about his weakness. Indeed he was made weak in order to be healed: he suffered blindness, but this weakness was for salvation. Indeed that blindness brought light. We have taken the story; let us recognize the mystery.

Chapter 45

45CSEL 32.2:103–104

sine Beniamin patriarchae primo perrexerant, sine Paulo apostoli. uterque non primus aduenit, sed arcessitus a primis uberiorem mercem priorum suo fecit aduentu. est inquit frumentum in Aegypto, hoc est: ubi maior fames, ibi maior ubertas est. magnum frumentum in Aegypto. denique et deus pater dicit: ex Aegypto uocaui filium meum. ex isto grano illa fecunditas; neque enim messis esse potuisset, nisi Aegyptii granum ante seuissent. est ergo frumentum, quod nemo ante esse credebat; in hoc frumento negotiantur patriarchae. et illi quidem argentum detulerant, sed bonus Ioseph frumentum dedit, argentum reddidit; non enim pecunia emitur Christus, sed gratia: pretium tuum fides est, hac emuntur diuina mysteria. portat autem frumentum hoc asinus ille ante inmundus in lege, sed iam mundus in gratia.-

The patriarchs first went without Benjamin, the apostles without Paul. Neither came first, but, summoned by the first, each by his coming made the merchandise of the earlier ones richer. 'There is grain,' he says, 'in Egypt,' that is, where the famine is greater, there the plenty is greater. Great is the grain in Egypt. Indeed God the Father too says: 'Out of Egypt I called my Son.' From that grain comes that fruitfulness; for there could have been no harvest unless the Egyptians had first sown the grain. There is, then, grain which no one before believed to exist; in this grain the patriarchs trade. And they indeed had brought silver, but good Joseph gave grain and returned the silver; for Christ is not bought with money but with grace. Your price is faith; by it the divine mysteries are bought. And that ass carries this grain, unclean before in the law, but now clean in grace.

Chapter 46

46CSEL 32.2:104–105

Tenebatur tamen Beniamin iunior et patrio adhuc haerebat adfectu. tenebant eum legis uincula, mos paternus. fames inualescebat, quia sero ueniebat. intercedunt pro eo duo, Ruben et Iudas, hoc est humilitas atque confessio. his uadibus aput patrem utitur, his committitur, quorum unus primitiuus, alius resuscitatus. lex primitiui, euangelium resuscitati. his deducitur Beniamin iunior et bonis odoribus comitatus aduenit portans secum resinam, qua lapides marmorum conectuntur, eo quod praedicatione propria tamquam spiritali resina uiuos lapides etiam iste conecteret: portans etiam mel, quo noxia uulneris interius exeduntur sine acerbitate aliqua sectionis. talis enim Pauli praedicatio, ut putrem aboleret adfectum conruptumque euacuaret umorem disputationis suae aculeo, urere magis aegra mentis uiscera cupiens quam secare. incensum orationis et casiam et guttam sepulturae insignia esse Dauid propheta nos docuit dicens: murra et gutta et casia a uestimentis tuis. uenit enim Paulus crucem domini praedicare, ilicem semper uirentem et nuces, quarum testa durior, fructus tenerior — meritoque uirga sacerdotalis Aaron nucina et Hieremiae baculum huiusmodi —, argentum quoque duplex. non otiosa munera esse quis dubitet, cum et patriarchae uita et apostoli sermo semper uirescat in pectoribus singulorum et eloquium sanctorum sicut argentum igne examinatum praecepti salubris fulgore resplendeat? nec inmerito duplex argentum referunt, in quibus Pauli praefigurabatur aduentus, qui laborantes presbyteros in uerbo atque doctrina duplici honore donabat.

Yet young Benjamin was held back and still clung to his father's affection. The bonds of the law held him, the ancestral custom. The famine grew worse, because he came late. Two intercede for him, Reuben and Judah, that is, humility and confession. He uses these as sureties with his father; to these he is entrusted, of whom one is the firstborn, the other the raised one. The law belongs to the firstborn, the gospel to the raised one. By these young Benjamin is brought down, and he comes accompanied by good fragrances, bringing with him resin, by which marble stones are joined, because he too would join living stones by his preaching as by a spiritual resin; bringing also honey, by which the harmful parts of a wound are eaten away from within without any bitterness of cutting. For such was Paul's preaching, so as to abolish a rotten disposition and drain corrupt humor by the sting of his argument, wishing rather to cauterize the sick inward parts of the mind than to cut. The prophet David taught us that incense is a sign of prayer, and cassia and the drop of myrrh are signs of burial, saying: 'Myrrh and the drop and cassia from your garments.' For Paul came to preach the cross of the Lord, an ever-green oak, and nuts, whose shell is harder and fruit tenderer — and rightly the priestly rod of Aaron was of walnut and Jeremiah's staff of the same kind — and double silver too. Who would doubt that these were not idle gifts, since both the life of the patriarch and the word of the apostle are always green in the hearts of individuals, and the speech of the saints, like silver tried in fire, shines with the brightness of saving precept? Nor without reason do they bring double silver, in whom the coming of Paul was prefigured, who gave double honor to presbyters who labor in the word and teaching.

Chapter 47

47CSEL 32.2:105

Uidit autem illos Ioseph et Beniamin fratrem suum ex eadem matre. iam uidentur Hebraei et uidentur a Christo, qui Ioseph uerus est, quando cum Pauli ueniunt typo, et loquitur illis mitia atque mansueta, ut pariter cibum sumant. supra autem, quia sine Beniamin uenerunt, agnoscebat quidem eos, sed ab his se auertebat, ut scriptum est: et loquebatur his dura, quia ipsi non agnoscebant eum a quo agnoscebantur. Pauli igitur merito profecerunt, quem dominus Iesus tamquam iuniorem fratrem ex eadem matre generatum amplius ceteris fratribus diligebat. aduertant Iudaei quem dominum negauerunt. qui etiam crucifixus ex synagoga eorum tamen tamquam ex eadem ortos parente plus diligit, si uel sero cognoscant suae salutis auctorem. sed propriorum conscii delictorum non credunt tantam Christi esse misericordiam, ut donet peccatum, remittat iniuriam. ideoque praefigurabantur in patriarchis quales essent futuri. inuitabantur ad gratiam, ad salutaris mensae uocabantur conuiuium, et calumniam sibi parari, insidias fieri suspicabantur.

'And Joseph saw them and his brother Benjamin, son of the same mother.' Now the Hebrews are seen, and seen by Christ, who is the true Joseph, when they come with the type of Paul; and he speaks gentle and mild things to them, so that they may take food together. But earlier, because they came without Benjamin, he recognized them but turned away from them, as it is written: 'And he spoke harsh things to them,' because they did not recognize him by whom they were recognized. By the merit of Paul, then, they made progress, whom the Lord Jesus loved more than the other brothers as a younger brother born of the same mother. Let the Jews take note of the Lord they denied. Even though crucified by their synagogue, he still loves them more as born of the same parent, if even late they recognize the author of their salvation. But conscious of their own offenses, they do not believe that Christ's mercy is so great as to forgive sin and remit injury. And therefore it was prefigured in the patriarchs what they would be like. They were invited to grace, they were called to the banquet of the saving table, and they suspected that a false charge was being prepared and a trap laid for them.

Chapter 48

48CSEL 32.2:105

et coeperunt ad hominem, qui erat supra domum, in ianua domus causam suam uelle agere. adhuc dubitant introire et ex operibus suis malunt iustificari qui causam uolunt adstruere quam gratiam accipere et ideo in portis redarguuntur. qui autem fructum uteri uirginalis expectat et hereditatem domini, filii mercem negotiatur non erubescit in porta, sed in exitu uitae huius repellit inimicum, ne ad altiora properanti conscius culpae grauioris obsistat.

'And they began to plead their case with the man who was over the house, at the door of the house.' They still hesitate to go in, and they prefer to be justified by their works, wishing to establish their case rather than receive grace; and therefore they are refuted in the gates. But he who awaits the fruit of the virgin's womb and the inheritance of the Lord, who trades in the merchandise of the Son, is not put to shame in the gate, but at the exit of this life drives back the enemy, so that he, conscious of graver guilt, may not oppose one hastening to higher things.

Chapter 49

49CSEL 32.2:105–107

unde mystice illis respondit maior domus. et is qui sit intellege, cum legeris Moysen fidelem in tota domo eius. maiores enim domus Moyses Petrus Paulus et ceteri sancti sunt, Christus autem solus est dominus. scriptum est quia Moyses fidelis in tota domo eius tamquam famulus in testimonium eorum quae dicta essent, Christus uero tamquam filius in domo sua, quae domus nos sumus, si libertatem et gloriam spei tenuerimus.

Hence, mystically, the steward of the house answered them. Understand who he is when you read that Moses was faithful in all his house. For the stewards of the house are Moses, Peter, Paul, and the other saints; but Christ alone is Lord. It is written that Moses was faithful in all his house as a servant, for a testimony of the things to be spoken, but Christ as a son in his own house, which house we are, if we hold fast the freedom and glory of hope.

Chapter 50

50CSEL 32.2:107–108

Hic ergo maior domus respondit illis: propitius sit uobis, nolite timere. deus enim uester et deus patrum uestrorum dedit uobis thensauros in sacculis uestris: argentum uestrum probum acceptum habeo. illi enim dixerant: argentum uniuscuiusque in sacculis nostris inuenimus. argentum nostrum ad pondus rettulimus. o magna mysteria et euidenter expressa! hoc est dicere: cur inflamini? argentum uos habere uestrum in sacculis saepius usurpatis? quid enim habetis quod non accepistis? si autem accepistis, quid gloriamini quasi non acceperitis? iam saturati estis, diuites facti estis. qui argentum habere uos creditis, sed argentum uobis deus patrum uestrorum dedit. ille deus uester, ille patrum uestrorum deus est, quem negastis. sed ignoscit. sed indulget, sed recipit, si reuertamini. ipse est, qui uestrum non quaerit argentum, suum donat. ipse uobis dedit argentum in sacculis uestris. iam sacculi uestri argentum habent, qui lutum habebant; et ideo uester est qui dicit: conscidisti saccum meum et induisti me laetitia. laetitiae munus est Christus. ipse est argentum uestrum, ipse est pretium uestrum. non exigit a uobis dominus Iesus frumenti sui pretium, non quaerit uestri pondus argenti.

This steward of the house, then, answered them: 'Peace to you, do not be afraid. Your God and the God of your fathers gave you treasures in your sacks; your good silver I have received.' For they had said: 'We found each man's silver in our sacks; we have brought back our silver by weight.' O great mysteries, and plainly expressed! It is as if to say: Why are you puffed up? Do you often claim that you have your own silver in your sacks? For what do you have that you did not receive? But if you received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it? Already you are filled, already you have become rich. You who believe you have silver — but the God of your fathers gave you the silver. He is your God, he is the God of your fathers, whom you denied. But he pardons, he forgives, he receives you back, if you return. He it is who does not seek your silver, but gives his own. He has given you silver in your sacks. Now your sacks, which held clay, have silver; and therefore he is yours who says: 'You have torn my sackcloth and clothed me with gladness.' Christ is the gift of gladness. He is your silver, he is your price. The Lord Jesus does not demand from you the price of his grain; he does not seek the weight of your silver.

Chapter 51

51CSEL 32.2:108

argentum uestrum reprobum est, argentum sacculi non est bonum. argentum uestrum probum acceptum habeo, hoc est: non est illud materiale argentum, sed spiritale argentum uestrum, hoc est probum, quod fida deuotione quasi Iacob filii detulistis, quod sine damno datur et sine ullo adnumeratur dispendio, quandoquidem tali pretio detrimentum mortis excluditur, lucrum uitae adquiritur. Parauerunt autem munera, donec introiret Ioseph meridie.

Your silver is reprobate; the silver of the sack is not good. 'Your good silver I have received,' that is: not that material silver, but your spiritual silver, which is good, which you have brought with faithful devotion as sons of Jacob, which is given without loss and counted out without any expense, since by such a price the loss of death is shut out and the gain of life is acquired. 'And they prepared the gifts until Joseph came in at noon.'

Chapter 52

52CSEL 32.2:108

accelerauit meridiem fides Pauli. ante caecus erat, postea coepit lumen uidere iustitiae, quoniam qui reuelat ad dominum uiam suam et sperat in eum, dominus quoque educet tamquam lumen iustitiam eius et iudicium eius sicut meridiem. et Abrae quando deus apparuit ad ilicem Mambrae, meridies erat, cui de praesentia domini lux aeterna fulgebat. meridies est, quando Ioseph uerus in domum suam intrat, ut prandeat. tunc enim plus dies lucet, quando sacramenta celebramus.

Paul's faith hastened the noon. Before he was blind; afterward he began to see the light of righteousness, since whoever reveals his way to the Lord and hopes in him, the Lord too will bring forth his righteousness as the light and his judgment as the noon. And when God appeared to Abraham at the oak of Mamre, it was noon, and eternal light shone on him from the presence of the Lord. It is noon when the true Joseph enters his house to dine. For the day shines more then, when we celebrate the sacraments.

Chapter 53

53CSEL 32.2:108

et intulerunt inquit ei munera. nos munera inferimus, ille instaurat conuiuium. ille dicit: adponite panes, quos soli Hebraei sumunt, Aegyptii manducare non possunt. sed ante conuiuium quanta dignatio! quam usus istius et sedulitatis et gratiae morale magisterium! adhuc de calumnia, quam sibi a Ioseph fieri putabant, fratres suspecti erant. ille inuitabat ad prandium: horum nutabat adfectus, illius perseuerat gratia. primus adpellat, primus interrogat: quomodo habetis?

'And they brought him the gifts,' it says. We bring gifts; he provides the banquet. He says: 'Set out the bread,' which only the Hebrews take, which the Egyptians cannot eat. But before the banquet, how great a condescension! What a moral lesson in his practice of attentiveness and graciousness! The brothers were still suspicious about the false charge they thought Joseph was preparing against them. He invited them to dinner: their feeling wavered, his grace persevered. He is the first to address them, the first to ask: 'How are you?'

Chapter 54

54CSEL 32.2:108–109

et iterum ait: recte est pater uester senior? superioris est inferiorem ad conloquium prouocare, dare sermonis fiduciam, quaerere non solum de ipsis, sed etiam de parentibus.

And again he says: 'Is your father, the old man, well?' It belongs to the superior to invite the inferior to conversation, to give him confidence in speaking, to ask not only about them but also about their parents.

Chapter 55

55CSEL 32.2:109

respondent illi: recte est puer tuus, pater noster. ille seniorem dixit, ut honoraret: isti puerum nominarunt, ut deferrent humilitatis obsequium, quod senectus honoratae sit dignitatis, pueritia autem subiecta uideatur et propior uerecundiae quam superbiae.

They answer: 'Your servant, our father, is well.' He said 'the old man,' to honor him; they named him 'servant' (puer), to offer the deference of humility, since old age is of honored dignity, while servanthood seems subject and nearer to modesty than to pride.

Chapter 56

56CSEL 32.2:109

Respiciens autem oculis uidit Beniamin fratrem suum ex eadem matre. morale est, ut quos diligimus eos uideamus prae ceteris et quos animi intentio tenet priores eos obtutus offendat oculorum, siquidem plerumque circa alia mentis occupatione districti quos habemus ante oculos non uidemus. ita duce animo dirigitur noster aspectus. uidit igitur Beniamin fratrem suum sanctus Ioseph, quem tenebat animo, quem oculis requirebat, quo absente fratres paene non uiderat, quia uidere nihil proderat. nec solum uidisse contentus quasi nesciret interrogauit: hic frater uester est adulescentior? consuetudo et gratia caritatis est, ut dilectos nobis non solum oculis, sed etiam sermone teneamus. agnouerat Ioseph dilectum suum, sed ideo interrogabat, ut quem tenebat animus uox sonaret.

'And looking up with his eyes he saw Benjamin his brother, son of the same mother.' The moral is that we see those we love before others, and those whom the attention of the mind holds the gaze of the eyes meets first, since often, occupied with other things in the mind, we do not see those we have before our eyes. So our sight is directed with the mind as guide. Holy Joseph, then, saw Benjamin his brother, whom he held in his mind, whom he sought with his eyes, without whom he had scarcely seen his brothers, because seeing them was of no profit. Nor was he content only to have seen him, but as though he did not know him he asked: 'Is this your youngest brother?' It is the custom and grace of love that we hold those dear to us not only with our eyes but also with speech. Joseph had recognized his beloved, but he asked so that his voice might sound the name of the one his mind held.

Chapter 57

57CSEL 32.2:109–110

denique non expectauit ut responderetur, sed continuo benedixit eum et turbatus est desiderii sui fructu. torquebantur autem uiscera eius, quia conplectendi eius quem desiderauerat libertas differebatur. denique ingressus in promptuarium plorauit et lauit faciem suam et continuit se. grandis amoris aculei cito corda conpungunt, nisi desiderii frena laxentur. uincebatur adfectu Ioseph, differebatur consilio: ratio cum amore certabat. fleuit, ut amoris pii aestus lacrimis temperaret.

Indeed he did not wait for an answer, but at once blessed him and was troubled at the fruit of his longing. For his inward parts were tormented, because the freedom to embrace the one he had longed for was delayed. Then, going into his chamber, he wept, washed his face, and restrained himself. The stings of great love quickly pierce the heart unless the reins of desire are loosened. Joseph was being overcome by feeling and held back by counsel; reason contended with love. He wept, so as to temper with tears the surge of devoted love.

Chapter 58

58CSEL 32.2:110–111

Haec moraliter; mystice autem uidit dominus Iesus Paulum oculi enim domini super iustos — et dixit: hic frater uester est adulescentior? adhuc adulescentior dicitur, qui nondum maturam canae fidei gerebat aetatem, nondum in uirum perfectum excreuerat. in illam, sicut ipse ait, mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi. denique adulescens legitur tantum ibi, ubi lapidantium Stephanum uestimenta seruabat. et ideo Philemonem non adulescentiae suae, sed senectutis similem esse cupiebat, ut scripsit: magis obsecro, cum sis talis ut Paulus senex. ideo adulescentiores uiduas praedicat declinandas, non propter aetatem, sed propter quandam pubiscentium delictorum lasciuiam inmaturitatemque uirtutis. ceterum maior in iuuene quam in sene laus castitatis est. puto autem quod a uero non sit alienum, si illud intellegamus, quia, cum hoc Paulus haberet et horreret correptus, quod caecitas accidisset ei, inciperet tamen adpropinquare dicendo: domine, quid me uis facere? ideo adulescentior dicebatur a Christo. ut qui uocabatur ad gratiam excusaretur a culpa, quod ea lubricae fuisset aetatis. denique uidit eum Christus. ubi lux circumfulsit eum, et quia adulescentes metu magis quam ratione reuocantur a uitio, adhibuit stimulum et miseratus admonuit, ne aduersus stimulum calcitraret.

So much in the moral sense. In the mystical sense, the Lord Jesus saw Paul — for the eyes of the Lord are on the just — and said: 'Is this your youngest brother?' He is still called the youngest, who did not yet bear the mature age of gray-haired faith and had not yet grown into the perfect man, into that measure of the age of the fullness of Christ, as he himself says. Indeed he is called a young man only in the place where he kept the garments of those stoning Stephen. And therefore he wished Philemon to be like not his youth but his old age, as he wrote: 'I rather beseech you, since you are such a one as Paul, an old man.' Therefore he teaches that younger widows are to be avoided, not because of their age, but because of a certain wantonness of budding offenses and immaturity in virtue. Yet the praise of chastity is greater in a young man than in an old one. I think, however, that it is not far from the truth if we understand it thus: that when Paul was seized and terrified because blindness had befallen him, he nevertheless began to draw near, saying: 'Lord, what do you want me to do?' Therefore he was called the youngest by Christ, so that he who was called to grace might be excused from guilt, as belonging to a slippery age. Indeed Christ saw him when the light shone around him; and since young men are called back from vice by fear rather than by reason, he applied the goad and in pity warned him not to kick against the goad.

Chapter 59

59CSEL 32.2:111

turbatus est autem, sicut habes in euangelio quia turbauit se spiritu, cum Lazarum suscitaret, et ibi fleuit. ut prius lacrimis suis mortui delicta lauaret. sed intra fleuit et lauit faciem suam. caecitas Pauli fletus est Christi: lauat faciem suam, ubi lumen ei reparatur amissum. lauit faciem suam Christus, ubi baptizatus est Paulus, per quem dominus Iesus a pluribus uideretur. et ideo in conuiuio pars eius quinquipliciter maior effecta est, quod haberet superioribus anteferri non solum mentis prudentia, sed etiam militia corporis et gratia castitatis.

He was troubled, as you have in the gospel that he troubled himself in spirit when he raised Lazarus, and there he wept, so as first to wash away the dead man's offenses with his tears. But he wept within and washed his face. Paul's blindness is Christ's weeping: he washes his face when lost light is restored to him. Christ washed his face when Paul was baptized, through whom the Lord Jesus would be seen by many. And therefore at the banquet his portion was made five times greater, because he was to be preferred to those before him not only in prudence of mind but also in the service of the body and the grace of chastity.

Chapter 60

60CSEL 32.2:111

Biberunt autem et inebriati sunt pariter cum eo. a principio fidei maior Paulo praerogatiua defertur, de quo dictum est ad Ananiam: uade, quoniam uas electionis est mihi ad sufferendum nomen meum coram gentibus. a principio inebriatur ebrietate, sed sobria, ut et ipse cum sanctis diceret: et poculum tuum inebrians quam praeclarum est!

'And they drank and were drunk together with him.' From the beginning of faith a greater prerogative was conferred on Paul, of whom it was said to Ananias: 'Go, for he is a chosen vessel to me, to bear my name before the nations.' From the beginning he was made drunk with a drunkenness, but a sober one, so that he too might say with the saints: 'And how glorious is your inebriating cup!'

Chapter 61

61CSEL 32.2:111

et scyphus argenteus soli sacco eius inseritur. nesciebat hoc Beniamin: fallebatur Paulus, sed uocabatur. mittitur post eum mane; nox enim processerat caecitatis, dies fidei adpropinquabat.

And the silver cup is put into his sack alone. Benjamin did not know this: Paul was deceived, but he was being called. They are sent after him in the morning; for the night of blindness had passed, the day of faith was at hand.

Chapter 62

62CSEL 32.2:111–112

per ordinem singulorum prius inspiciuntur sacculi. docet te moralitatem scriptura diuina. per ordinem ante discubuerunt in conuiuio contra eum, primitiuus secundum aetatem. uides quod seniori locus ille sit deferendus. per ordinem iterum requiruntur sacculi singulorum, ut scias electum Paulum caelesti esse iudicio. discussit ceteros, hunc praetulit. in nullius alterius sacco scyphus inuentus est argenteus nisi istius. quid sibi uult quod insertus est sacculo? Ioseph quidem inebriauit ut falleret, scyphum misit ut fratrem quem diligebat pia fraude reuocaret, sed refulgent mysteria diuina.

The sacks of each are searched in order first. Divine Scripture teaches you a moral. In order they had earlier reclined at the banquet before him, the firstborn according to his age. You see that the first place is to be given to the elder. In order again the sacks of each are searched, so that you may know that Paul was chosen by heavenly judgment. He examined the others; this one he preferred. In no one else's sack was the silver cup found but in his. What does it mean that it was put into his sack? Joseph indeed made them drunk in order to deceive them, and put in the cup in order to call back by a loving deceit the brother he loved; but the divine mysteries shine through.

Chapter 63

63CSEL 32.2:112

Hoc inuenit in nobis Christus argentum, quod ipse donauerit. habemus naturae argentum, habemus et gratiae. natura opus est creatoris, gratia munus est redemptoris. etsi non possumus uidere dona Christi, ille tamen donat et operatur occulte et donat omnibus, sed seruare paucorum est et non amittere. non omnibus tamen donat omnia. triticum multis datur, scyphus uni, qui prophetico et sacerdotali donatur munere. non enim omnis, sed propheta dicit: calicem salutaris accipiam et nomen domini inuocabo.

This silver Christ found in us, which he himself had given. We have the silver of nature, and we have that of grace. Nature is the work of the creator, grace the gift of the redeemer. Even if we cannot see the gifts of Christ, he still gives and works in secret, and gives to all; but to keep and not lose belongs to few. Yet he does not give all things to all. Wheat is given to many, the cup to one, who is given the prophetic and priestly gift. For not everyone but the prophet says: 'I will take the cup of salvation and call upon the name of the Lord.'

Chapter 64

64CSEL 32.2:112–113

in corpore igitur Pauli iam doctrinae caelestis adloquium refulgebat, cum esset eruditus in lege. sed quia adhuc iustitiae dei subiectus non erat, intra saccum erat scyphus, doctrina intra legem, lucerna intra modium. missus tamen Ananias, qui benedictionem daret, manum inponeret, saccum solueret. sacco soluto reluxit argentum et decidentibus squamis uelut quibusdam sacci uinculis statim uidit. uinculum eius perfidia erat, absolutio eius fides facta est. et ideo tamquam soluto sacco, hoc est deposito legis uelamine, quod supra cor est positum Iudaeorum, conuersus ad dominum, liber a nexu adeptus gratiam libertatis ait: nos itaque omnes reuelata facie gloriam dei speculantes ad eandem imaginem reformamur. soluto enim calciamento legis nudo uestigio liberi sermonis euangelium praedicabat. tenebant eum Iudaei et inpedire cupiebant, sed ubi in eius sacco argentum resplenduit, sciderunt uestimenta sua et reuersi sunt retro. libera enim pro Christo Pauli praedicatio nudauit populum Iudaeorum et omnem eorum rescidit gratiam,

In Paul's body, then, the voice of heavenly teaching was already shining, since he was learned in the law. But because he was not yet subject to the righteousness of God, the cup was inside the sack, teaching inside the law, the lamp under the bushel. Yet Ananias was sent to give a blessing, lay on his hand, and untie the sack. When the sack was untied, the silver shone out, and as the scales fell, like the ties of a sack, at once he saw. Faithlessness was his bond; faith became his release. And therefore, as though the sack were untied, that is, the veil of the law laid aside that is placed over the heart of the Jews, turned to the Lord, free from the bond and having gained the grace of freedom, he says: 'And so we all, beholding the glory of God with unveiled face, are transformed into the same image.' For with the sandal of the law loosed, he preached the gospel with the bare foot of free speech. The Jews held him and wished to hinder him; but when the silver shone in his sack, they tore their garments and turned back. For Paul's free preaching for Christ stripped the people of the Jews and cut away all their grace,

Chapter 65

65CSEL 32.2:113

ideoque retro regressi sunt, qui ante se uidere non poterant. retro redeunt qui Christum amittunt. denique et in euangelio, cum corriperent ad mortem dominum Iesum, redeuntes retro ceciderunt in terram. merito retro reuertebantur, qui in terrenam labem ab illa caelesti gratia recidebant. nolebant igitur moraliter redire sine fratre, mystice sine Paulo reuerti, quo amisso adserebant in maerorem deducendam parentis populi senectutem.

and therefore they turned back, who could not see before them. Those who lose Christ go back. Indeed in the gospel too, when they seized the Lord Jesus for death, they went back and fell to the ground. Rightly they turned back, who were falling from that heavenly grace into earthly ruin. They were unwilling, then, morally to return without their brother, mystically to go back without Paul, without whom they declared that the old age of the parent people would be brought down in sorrow.

Chapter 66

66CSEL 32.2:113

et ideo Iudas apud Ioseph remanere cupiebat, ne uideret mala, quae inuenerunt patrem suum, hoc est iam praeuidebat et cauere cupiebat mala, quae uentura erant populo Iudaeorum. sed cum adhuc haec ipsa non esset in typo illo principum populi Iudaeorum libera praedicatio, fleuit Ioseph, hoc est in illo plorauit Iesus.

And therefore Judah wished to remain with Joseph, so as not to see the evils that would befall his father; that is, he already foresaw and wished to guard against the evils that were to come upon the people of the Jews. But since that free preaching was not yet in that figure of the leaders of the Jewish people, Joseph wept, that is, in him Jesus wept.

Chapter 67

67CSEL 32.2:113–114

Et iussit omnes recedere, ut cognosceretur a fratribus; non uenerat enim, sicut ipse ait, nisi ad oues, quae perierunt domus Istrahel. et emittens uocem cum fletu ego sum inquit Ioseph; adhuc pater meus uiuit? hoc est: expandit manus suas ad populum non credentem et contradicentem, non legatum neque nuntium quaerens, sed ipse dominus saluum facere uolens populum suum. ipse qui loquebar adsum inquit et palam factus non quaerentibus me adpareo his qui me non interrogabant. quid igitur aliud tunc clamauit nisi: ego sum Iesus, cum a principibus Iudaeorum < temptatus > interrogantibus: tu es filius dei? responderet: uos dicitis quod ego sum, cum Pilato diceret: tu dicis quia rex sum; ego in hoc natus sum, cum principi sacerdotum dicenti: adiuro te per deum uiuum, ut dicas nobis si tu es Christus filius dei, referret: tu dixisti. amen dico uobis, amodo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem ad dexteram uirtutis et uenientem cum nubibus caeli. hoc est ergo quod ait: ego sum Ioseph, ego sum diuinae potentiae. adhuc pater meus uiuit? hoc est: ego patrem non nego, ego fratres agnosco, si aut uos fratrem aut pater filium recognoscat. adhuc ergo populus meus uiuit, de cuius populi familia fratrem mihi elegi?

And he ordered everyone to withdraw, so that he might make himself known to his brothers; for, as he himself says, he had come only to the sheep that were lost of the house of Israel. And raising his voice with weeping he said: 'I am Joseph; is my father still alive?' That is: he spread out his hands to an unbelieving and contradicting people, seeking no envoy or messenger, but the Lord himself wishing to save his people. 'I who spoke am here,' he says, 'and I was made manifest to those who did not seek me, I appeared to those who did not ask for me.' What else did he cry out then but: 'I am Jesus,' when, < tested > by the leaders of the Jews asking: 'Are you the Son of God?', he answered: 'You say that I am'; when he said to Pilate: 'You say that I am a king; for this I was born'; when to the high priest, who said: 'I adjure you by the living God to tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God,' he replied: 'You have said so. Truly I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven.' This, then, is what he says: 'I am Joseph,' I am of divine power. 'Is my father still alive?' That is: I do not deny my father, I acknowledge my brothers, if either you recognize your brother or the father his son. Does my people still live, then, from whose family I chose a brother for myself?

Chapter 68

68CSEL 32.2:114

accedite ad me, quia ego ad uos adpropinquaui et eo usque, ut per carnis susceptionem facerem me uestrae consortem naturae. nolite uel participem fugere uestrae societatis, si non agnoscitis auctorem salutis.

'Come near to me,' because I have come near to you, even so far as to make myself a sharer in your nature by taking on flesh. Do not flee even the partner of your fellowship, if you do not recognize the author of salvation.

Chapter 69

69CSEL 32.2:114–115

et accesserunt inquit ad illum, et dixit: ego sum Ioseph frater uester, quem uos tradidistis in Aegyptum. nunc ergo nolite maesti esse neque uobis durum uideatur, quoniam hic me uendidistis; ad uitam enim misit me deus ante uos. quam fraterna pietas, quam dulcis germanitas, ut etiam parricidale excusaret admissum dicens diuinae illud prouidentiae fuisse, non inpietatis humanae, quandoquidem non ab hominibus oblatus ad mortem, sed a domino missus ad uitam sit. quid aliud habet illa domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui fratres omnes pietate superauit, in cruce positi intercessio pro plebe dicentis: pater, dimitte illis; non enim sciunt quid faciunt? quid aliud illa appellatio sanctitatis in medio discipulorum dicentis: pax uobis: ego sum, nolite timere? et cum conturbati et conterriti existimarent spiritum uidere, iterum dixit ad illos: quid turbati estis et quare cogitationes ascendunt in corde uestro? uidete ecce manus meas et pedes meos, quia ego sum ipse. palpate et uidete quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me uidetis habere. haec ergo iam tunc futura posterioribus temporibus mysteria reuelata sunt.

'And they came near to him,' it says, 'and he said: I am Joseph your brother, whom you handed over into Egypt. Now, then, do not be sad, nor let it seem hard to you that you sold me here; for God sent me before you for life.' What brotherly love, what sweet kinship, that he even excused the fratricidal deed, saying that it was of divine providence, not of human ungodliness, since he was not offered to death by men but sent by the Lord for life! What else does that intercession of our Lord Jesus Christ have, who surpassed all brothers in love, as he hung on the cross, saying for the people: 'Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do'? What else that address of holiness in the midst of his disciples, saying: 'Peace to you; it is I, do not be afraid'? And when, troubled and terrified, they thought they saw a spirit, he said to them again: 'Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your heart? See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Handle and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.' These mysteries, then, which were to come in later times, were revealed already then.

Chapter 70

70CSEL 32.2:115–116

Denique ipsis exprimuntur sermonibus, ut ipsum esse intellegamus et qui ante in Ioseph et postea in suo locutus est corpore, quandoquidem nec uerba mutauit. ait enim tunc: nolite maesti esse et infra: ascendite ad patrem meum et dicite illi: haec dicit filius tuus Ioseph: fecit me deus dominum totius terrae Aegypti. et in euangelio ait: nolite timere. ite nuntiate fratribus meis, ut eant in Galilaeam, et ibi me uidebunt. et infra ait: data est mihi omnis potestas in caelis et in terra, hoc est dicere: diuinae hoc fuit dispositionis, ut acciperem potestatem, non acerbitatis humanae. non obicit scelus qui enumerat praemium.

Indeed they are expressed in the very words, so that we may understand that it is he himself who spoke first in Joseph and afterward in his own body, since he did not even change the words. For he said then: 'Do not be sad,' and further on: 'Go up to my father and say to him: Thus says your son Joseph: God has made me lord of all the land of Egypt.' And in the gospel he says: 'Do not be afraid; go, tell my brothers to go to Galilee, and there they will see me.' And further on he says: 'All power has been given to me in heaven and on earth,' that is to say: this was of divine disposition, that I should receive power, not of human harshness. He who enumerates the reward does not reproach the crime.

Chapter 71

71CSEL 32.2:116

quod autem habet in Genesi: ad uitam enim misit me deus ante uos reddit in euangelio dicens: docete omnes gentes, baptizantes eas in nomine patris et fili et spiritus sancti; haec enim est merces et uita sanctorum, quod etiam alios redemerunt.

And what it has in Genesis, 'For God sent me before you for life,' he renders in the gospel, saying: 'Teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit'; for this is the reward and life of the saints, that they have redeemed others too.

Chapter 72

72CSEL 32.2:116

illud quoque aduerte non otiose scriptum in Genesi: et eris prope me, tu et fili tui et filii filiorum tuorum; hoc est enim quod dixit in euangelio: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi.

Notice also that it is not idly written in Genesis: 'And you shall be near me, you and your sons and your sons' sons'; for this is what he said in the gospel: 'Behold, I am with you all days until the end of the age.'

Chapter 73

73CSEL 32.2:116

quam euidens quoque illud mysterium, quod ueluti conpleto omni mandato fratrem suum Beniamin amplectitur Ioseph et cecidit super collum eius, sicut conpleto euangelio Paulum Christus amplectitur quibusdam misericordiae suae bracchiis, ut interna opinione curuatum uelut a collo in caelum erigat. unde et ille erectus a Christo ait: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est.

How evident too is that mystery, that, as though every command had been fulfilled, Joseph embraces his brother Benjamin and fell on his neck, as, when the gospel was fulfilled, Christ embraces Paul with the arms, as it were, of his mercy, so as to raise him, bowed down by inner conviction, from the neck, as it were, to heaven. Hence, raised up by Christ, he says: 'But our citizenship is in heaven.'

Chapter 74

74CSEL 32.2:116–117

Et gauisus est Pharao, quod Ioseph agnouisset fratres suos. unde et uulgata est uox in domo Pharao et hortatus est sanctum Ioseph, ut fratres suos inuitet. ut ueniant cum patre, et mandat inpleri eorum sarcinas tritico et in uehicula dari. unde haec humanitas barbaro, nisi illud ostenderetur magnum mysterium, quod iam non inuidet ecclesia, cum redimuntur Iudaei, et populus Christianus hac adiunctione. laetatur et quibus potest subsidiis iuuat et mittit euangelizantes regnum dei, quo maturius euocentur? quibus dantur binae stolae.

'And Pharaoh rejoiced that Joseph had recognized his brothers.' Hence the news was spread in Pharaoh's house, and he urged holy Joseph to invite his brothers to come with their father, and he orders their packs to be filled with wheat and wagons to be given them. Where did a barbarian get this kindness, unless a great mystery was being shown: that the church no longer envies when the Jews are redeemed, and the Christian people rejoices at this joining and helps with whatever support it can, and sends those who preach the kingdom of God, so that they may be called out the sooner? To them two robes are given.

Chapter 75

75CSEL 32.2:117–118

et allegat Paulum, cum eius dicta depromit, cui trecenti aurei et quinque stolae diuersi coloris conferuntur a Christo. trecentos aureos habet qui crucem praedicat Christi, ideoque ait: neque enim iudicaui scire me aliquid inter uos nisi Christum Iesum et hunc crucifixum. et bene aureos accipit. quia non in suasoriis sapientiae uerbis, sed in ostensione spiritus praedicabat. quinque autem stolas accipit uel sapientiae multiplicis disciplinas uel quod nullis sensuum corporalium captus inlecebris ubi aliis periculum illic teneret uictoriam, qui omnes uoluptates carnis singulari continentia et uirtute superaret, cuius ingenium studiumque nulla corporis hebetaret infirmitas, qui, cum esset in corpore, corpus se habere nesciret. denique raptus in paradisum siue in corpore siue extra corpus nesciens audiuit uerba ineffabilia, quae loqui homini non liceret, qui postremo terrenum nihil oleret in terris, sicut ipse docet dicens: quia Christi bonus odor sumus deo in his qui salui fiunt.

And he sends Paul as his envoy when he sets forth his words, on whom three hundred gold pieces and five robes of various colors are conferred by Christ. He has three hundred gold pieces who preaches the cross of Christ, and therefore he says: 'For I decided to know nothing among you except Christ Jesus and him crucified.' And rightly he receives gold pieces, because he preached not in persuasive words of wisdom but in the demonstration of the Spirit. And he receives five robes, either the disciplines of manifold wisdom, or because, captured by no enticements of the bodily senses, he held victory where others had danger; he overcame all the pleasures of the flesh with singular continence and virtue; no weakness of the body dulled his talent and zeal; while he was in the body he did not know he had a body. Indeed, caught up into paradise, not knowing whether in the body or out of the body, he heard unspeakable words which it is not lawful for a man to speak; and finally he smelled of nothing earthly on earth, as he himself teaches, saying: 'For we are the good fragrance of Christ to God among those who are being saved.'

Chapter 76

76CSEL 32.2:118

praecellit igitur Paulus et eius exuberat portio, sed tamen habent et alii praedicatores gratiam suam. binas stolas accipiunt. quas? illas utique, de quibus dubitare non debes, quia legisti de Sapientia dictum: binas uestis fecit uiro suo. una est mystica, moralis altera. sed non omnes apostoli, non omnes prophetae. non omnes pastores, non omnes uirtutes, non omnes habent gratiam curationum, non omnes linguis loquuntur. ubi diuersa praemia, merita diuersa.

Paul, then, excels, and his portion overflows; yet the other preachers too have their grace. They receive two robes each. Which? Surely those about which you ought not to doubt, since you have read it said of Wisdom: 'She made double garments for her husband.' One is mystical, the other moral. But not all are apostles, not all prophets, not all pastors, not all workers of miracles; not all have the grace of healings, not all speak in tongues. Where there are different rewards, there are different merits.

Chapter 77

77CSEL 32.2:118

et praemittuntur et patri munera. filius honorat patrem, Christus populum suum inuitat promissis, inuitat muneribus. portant haec munera illi asini inutiles et laboriosi ante, nunc utiles, portant in typo Christi munera portaturi in euangelio munerum largitorem.

And gifts are sent ahead to the father too. The son honors the father; Christ invites his people with promises, invites them with gifts. These gifts are carried by those asses, useless and toiling before, now useful; in the type of Christ they carry gifts, being about to carry the giver of gifts in the gospel.

Chapter 78

78CSEL 32.2:118–119

Dimisit autem fratres suos et abierunt. et dixit illis Ioseph: nolite irasci in uia. quam bene docet ab iracundia praecauendum, quod ea possit etiam amantes sui separare germanos, et maxime in uia fugiendam esse discordiam, ubi ipse uiandi comitatus debet inuiolabilis gratiae habere consortium. quid aliud autem ait dominus noster Iesus ex hoc corpore recessurus, cum discipulos dimitteret suos, nisi ne irascerentur in uia, dicens: pacem relinquo uobis, pacem meam do uobis? ubi enim pax est, iracundia locum non habet, ablegatur discordia, fugatur dissensio. hoc est ergo quod ait: pacem meam do uobis, id est nolite irasci in uia. et uide ne in hac uia dicat, hoc est in hoc cursu totius uitae indignationem cauendam, quod ira saepe etiam innocentes in crimen adducat, quia, dum iusto amplius irascimur et uolumus alienum coercere peccatum, grauiora peccata conmittimus. ideo apostolus non uos ipsos inquit uindicantes, carissimi, sed date locum irae, hoc est declinemus eam, ne nos illa corripiat. unde et dominus Iesus dimittens ad euangelizandum discipulos misit eos sine auro, sine argento, sine pecunia, sine uirga, id est ut et incentiua litis et instrumenta eriperet ultionis.

'And he sent his brothers away, and they departed. And Joseph said to them: Do not be angry on the way.' How well he teaches that we must guard against anger, because it can separate even brothers who love one another, and that discord must be avoided especially on the way, where the very companionship of travel ought to have the fellowship of inviolable grace. And what else did our Lord Jesus say when about to depart from this body, when he sent away his disciples, but that they should not be angry on the way, saying: 'Peace I leave you, my peace I give you'? For where there is peace, anger has no place, discord is banished, dissension put to flight. This, then, is what he says: 'My peace I give you,' that is, do not be angry on the way. And see whether he does not mean 'on this way,' that is, in this course of the whole of life, indignation must be avoided, because anger often leads even the innocent into crime, since, while we are angry beyond what is just and wish to restrain another's sin, we commit graver sins. Therefore the apostle says: 'Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but give place to wrath,' that is, let us avoid it, lest it seize us. Hence the Lord Jesus too, sending his disciples to preach the gospel, sent them without gold, without silver, without money, without a staff, that is, so as to take away both the incitements to strife and the instruments of revenge.

Chapter 79

79CSEL 32.2:119–120

Et ascenderunt inquit de Aegypto et uenerunt in terram Chanaan ad Iacob patrem suum et nuntiauerunt illi dicentes quia Ioseph filius tuus uiuit et ipse est princeps totius terrae Aegypti. quae est terra Chanaan? quae nutabat. quid igitur tam euidens quam apostolorum tempora designari, quibus ingressi Iudaeorum synagogas nutantes Iesu domini potentiam praedicabant, sicut habemus in Actibus apostolorum dicente Petro: hunc ergo Iesum resuscitauit deus, cuius nos testes sumus. dextera igitur dei exaltatus repromissione spiritus sancti accepta a patre effudit hoc donum, quod uos uidetis? aduertimus certe quomodo et uiuere eum et terrae totius principem dicat, qui aperiens horrea sua spiritalis gratiae donet omnibus ubertatem. haec dicebant apostoli, sed Iudaei non credebant, sed iniciebant manus in eos et trudebant in custodiam praedicatores salutis.

'And they went up out of Egypt,' it says, 'and came into the land of Canaan to Jacob their father, and told him, saying that Joseph your son is alive, and he is ruler of all the land of Egypt.' What is the land of Canaan? One that wavered. What, then, is so evident as that the times of the apostles are designated, when they went into the wavering synagogues of the Jews and preached the power of the Lord Jesus, as we have in the Acts of the Apostles, Peter saying: 'This Jesus, then, God raised up, of whom we are witnesses. Being exalted, then, by the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this gift which you see'? We certainly notice how he says both that he lives and that he is ruler of all the earth, who, opening the granaries of spiritual grace, gives abundance to all. This the apostles said, but the Jews did not believe; rather they laid hands on them and thrust the preachers of salvation into custody.

Chapter 80

80CSEL 32.2:120

unde et de Iacob scriptum est: expauit mente; non enim credebat eis. expauit adfectu plebis incredulae, sed posteaquam Christi gesta cognouit, tantis beneficiis et operibus delinitus resumpsit spiritum dicens: magnum mihi est, si adhuc filius meus Ioseph uiuit. ibo et uidebo illum, priusquam moriar. primum et maximum fidei fundamentum in resurrectionem Christi credere. quicumque enim crediderit resuscitatum festinus requirit, deuotus accedit et intima deum mente ueneratur; credit enim quod ipse non moriatur, si credat in resurrectionis auctorem. Et eleuans se Istrahel uenit ad puteum iuramenti et immolauit hostiam deo patris sui Isaac.

Hence it is written of Jacob too: 'He was stunned in mind, for he did not believe them.' He was stunned with the disposition of an unbelieving people; but after he learned the deeds of Christ, softened by such great kindnesses and works, he revived in spirit, saying: 'It is a great thing to me if my son Joseph is still alive. I will go and see him before I die.' The first and greatest foundation of faith is to believe in the resurrection of Christ. For whoever has believed that he was raised seeks him eagerly, approaches devoutly, and venerates God with inmost mind; for he believes that he himself does not die, if he believes in the author of the resurrection. 'And Israel set out and came to the well of the oath and offered a sacrifice to the God of his father Isaac.'

Chapter 81

81CSEL 32.2:120

merito eleuatur qui festinat ad Christum. fides praecedit deuotionem. prius se eleuauit, postea immolauit: ille enim bene immolat qui cognitionem diuinitatis inuestigauerit.

Rightly he is lifted up who hastens to Christ. Faith precedes devotion. First he lifted himself up, then he sacrificed; for he sacrifices well who has searched out the knowledge of the divinity.

Chapter 82

82CSEL 32.2:120–121

dixit autem deus ad Istrahel in uisu nocte dicens: Iacob, Iacob. qui dixit: quid est? dicens: ego sum deus patrum tuorum: noli timere, descende in Aegyptum; in gentem enim magnam te faciam ibi. ego descendam tecum in Aegyptum et ego deducam te in perpetuum. quemadmodum quae ipsi legunt non intellegunt et Moysen quem laudant abnegant, cum eius scriptis nolunt credere! quid euidentius quam quod hoc loco inuitantur, ut ad ecclesiam dei transeant et qui ante intra Iudaeae terminos coartabantur angustos ad populum dei migrent, qui ex toto orbe, ex omnibus nationibus et populis congregatus in magnam factus est gentem? denique in omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum. uocatur ergo a filiis suis Iacob, id est a Petro Iohanne Paulo populus Iudaeorum inuitatur ad gratiam.

'And God said to Israel in a vision by night, saying: Jacob, Jacob. And he said: What is it? Saying: I am the God of your fathers; do not be afraid, go down into Egypt, for I will make you a great nation there. I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will lead you forever.' How they do not understand what they themselves read, and deny Moses whom they praise, when they will not believe his writings! What is more evident than that in this place they are invited to pass over to the church of God, and that those who were before confined within the narrow borders of Judea should migrate to the people of God, which, gathered from the whole world, from all nations and peoples, has become a great nation? Indeed their sound went out into all the earth. Jacob, then, is called by his sons, that is, the people of the Jews is invited to grace by Peter, John, and Paul.

Chapter 83

83CSEL 32.2:121–122

ipse quoque deus noster proprio eum hortatur oraculo, spondet ei profectum fidei muneris sui fructum dicens ei: Ioseph mittet manum super oculos tuos. non utique sanctus patriarcha. sollicitus erat a quo ei oculi clauderentur, licet etiam intellectu simplici moralis exprimatur adfectus. nam si eos quos diligimus cupimus frequenter amplecti, quanto magis recessuri ex hoc corpore ipso carorum pignorum tactu delectamur extremo et hoc mulcemur uiatico. tamen mystice licet nobis intellegere quod postea cogniturus deum sit populus Iudaeorum. hoc est enim mysterium, quod uerus Ioseph immittet manus super oculos eius, ut qui non uidebat ante iam uideat. ueni ad euangelium, lege quemadmodum caecus ille sanatus sit, cui Iesus manum inposuit et eius abstulit caecitatem. non enim morituris manum Christus inponit, sed uicturis, aut si morituris, recte, quia prius morimur, ut reuiuiscamus; non enim possumus deo uiuere, nisi peccato ante moriamur.

Our God himself also encourages him by his own oracle and promises him the progress of faith, the fruit of his gift, saying to him: 'Joseph will put his hand on your eyes.' Surely the holy patriarch was not anxious about who would close his eyes, though even by a simple understanding a moral affection is expressed. For if we desire often to embrace those we love, how much more, when about to depart from this body, do we delight in the last touch of our dear children and are soothed by this provision for the journey. Yet mystically we may understand that the people of the Jews would afterward come to know God. For this is the mystery: that the true Joseph will put his hands on its eyes, so that one who before did not see may now see. Come to the gospel, read how that blind man was healed on whom Jesus laid his hand and took away his blindness. For Christ lays his hand not on those about to die but on those who are to live; or if on those about to die, rightly so, because we first die in order to live again; for we cannot live to God unless we first die to sin.

Chapter 84

84CSEL 32.2:122

Descendunt igitur in Aegyptum septuaginta quinque animae, sicut scriptum est, et hoc mystice numero remissionis, quia post tantam duritiam, post tanta peccata haberentur indigni, nisi donaretur his remissio peccatorum. occurrit illi Iudas, hoc est confessio erroris. hunc sui uenturus Iudaeorum populus praenuntium mittit. ideo et Ioseph uerus, id est arbiter et interpres diuinitatis, occurrit, quia praecedit iam confessio quos ante perfidia possidebat. interpres est enim diuinitatis Christus, quia deum nemo uidit umquam, nisi unigenitus filius, qui est in sinu patris, ipse enarrauit. hic senilis iam aetatis et fessum suscipiet ultimis temporibus populum Iudaeorum, non secundum illius merita, sed secundum electionem suae gratiae et inponet manum super oculos eius, ut caecitatem auferat. cuius ideo distulit sanitatem, ut postremus crederet, qui ante non putauit esse credendum, et praerogatiuam superioris electionis amitteret. unde et apostolus ait: quia caecitas ex parte Istrahel contigit, donec plenitudo gentium intraret et sic omnis Istrahel saluus fieret.

Seventy-five souls, then, go down into Egypt, as it is written, and this mystically in the number of remission, because after such hardness, after so many sins, they would be held unworthy unless the remission of sins were granted them. Judah meets him, that is, the confession of error. This the people of the Jews, when it is to come, sends as its forerunner. Therefore the true Joseph too, that is, the judge and interpreter of the divinity, meets them, because confession now goes before those whom faithlessness formerly possessed. For Christ is the interpreter of the divinity, because no one has ever seen God except the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father; he has made him known. He will receive the people of the Jews, already of old age and weary, in the last times, not according to its merits but according to the election of his grace, and will lay his hand on its eyes to take away its blindness. He has postponed its healing so that it might believe last, which before did not think it should believe, and lose the prerogative of its earlier election. Hence the apostle too says that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the gentiles should come in, and so all Israel would be saved.

Chapter 85

85CSEL 32.2:122–123

gesta igitur patriarcharum futurorum mysteria sunt. denique ipse Iacob sic ait ad filios suos: congregamini, ut adnuntiem uobis quae occursura sunt uobis in nouissimis diebus. congregamini et audite Istrahel patrem uestrum.

The deeds of the patriarchs, then, are mysteries of things to come. Indeed Jacob himself speaks thus to his sons: 'Gather together, that I may tell you what will befall you in the last days. Gather together and hear Israel your father.'