Explanation of Twelve Psalms

The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.

Show

Explanation 1, chapter 1

1.1.1CSEL 64:3

Summum incentiuum uirtutis proposuit deus futurae beatitudinis delectationem; uehemens quoque calcar erroris delectationem esse diabolus excogitauit. utriusque sententiae praestat indicium primus humani generis Adam a domino deo in paradiso positus uoluptatis, ut aeterna delectatione frueretur ad uirtutem futurae subolis prouocandam — neque enim erat incognitum deo locum eum errori daturum et ceteris propositam spem salutis esse debere, qua in praereptam humano sedem generi contenderent reformari —, et idem per speciem serpentis, quae praefigurauit delectationis illecebras, uxoria persuasione deceptus.

God set before us, as the highest incentive to virtue, the delight of future blessedness; the devil, for his part, devised delight as a vehement spur to error. Of both purposes the first of the human race gives proof: Adam, placed by the Lord God in the paradise of pleasure so that he might enjoy everlasting delight and so be roused to the virtue of the offspring to come (for it was not unknown to God that he would give way to error, and that the hope of salvation must be set before the rest, by which they might strive to be restored to the seat snatched away from the human race), was the same Adam who, through the form of the serpent, which prefigured the enticements of delight, was deceived by his wife's persuasion.

1.1.2CSEL 64:3

occasione igitur accepta aduersarius per delectationem mihi operatus est mortem. itaque quod diuina gratia tributum erat ad uitam, factum est mihi in mortem eoque faciliorem inimicus assensum hominis habuit ad lapsum, quo speciem praetendit naturae. delectarunt enim opera sua dominum, delectarunt prima naturae exordia, quae uidens dominus ait: bona ualde.

So the adversary, seizing the occasion, worked death for me through delight. Thus what had been granted by divine grace for life became for me a means of death, and the enemy found man's consent to the fall all the easier because he held out the appearance of nature. For his works delighted the Lord; the first beginnings of nature delighted him; seeing them the Lord said: "Very good."

Explanation 1, chapter 2

1.2.1CSEL 64:3–4

Laudant angeli dominum, psallunt ei potestates caelorum et ante ipsum initium mundi Cherubim et Seraphim cum suauitate canorae uocis suae dicunt: sanctus sanctus sanctus. innumera angelorum milia adsistunt et seniores et turba magna sicut uoces aquarum multarum concinunt: alleluia. ipsum axem caeli fert expressior sermo cum quadam perpetui concentus

The angels praise the Lord, the powers of the heavens sing psalms to him, and before the very beginning of the world the Cherubim and Seraphim, with the sweetness of their tuneful voice, say: "Holy, holy, holy." Countless thousands of angels stand by, and the elders and a great multitude, like the sound of many waters, sing together: "Alleluia." A more explicit saying holds that the very axis of heaven turns with a certain

1.2.2CSEL 64:4

suauitate uersari, ut sonus eius extremis terrarum partibus audiretur, ubi sunt quaedam secreta naturae. nec id ab usu naturae alienum uidetur, quandoquidem uox missa gratiore plausu e nemoribus resultet aut montibus et suauiore sono reddant quod acceperint. in scopulis quoque ipsis et lapidibus repperit natura quod delectaret; aliorum specula, aliorum usus delectat aut gratia. ferae ipsae atque aues loci amoenioris aut modulatioris uocis delectatione mulcentur, lactantibus quoque paruulis aut seueritas terrori est aut blanditiae uoluptati. naturalis igitur delectatio est.

sweetness of unceasing harmony, so that its sound is heard in the farthest parts of the earth, where certain secrets of nature lie. Nor does this seem foreign to the way nature works, since a voice sent out rebounds with a more pleasing echo from woods or mountains, and they return with sweeter sound what they have received. Even in cliffs and stones nature has found something to delight: some delight by their outlook, others by their use or their beauty. Wild beasts themselves and birds are soothed by the delight of a pleasanter place or a more tuneful voice; and in nursing infants severity causes fear and caresses pleasure. Delight, therefore, is natural.

Explanation 1, chapter 3

1.3.1CSEL 64:4

Unde et Dauid sanctus, qui aduerteret, unde homo et qua esset fraude deiectus — nam si tenuisset infusam sibi a domino aeternae illius caelestisque delectationis gratiam nec saecularibus captus amisisset illecebris, numquam tam miserabilis aerumnae subisset iniurias —, itaque reparare eam studens et reformare psallendi munere caelestis nobis instar conuersationis instituit.

Hence holy David too, who perceived from what height man had fallen and by what fraud he had been cast down (for if he had held fast the grace of that eternal and heavenly delight poured into him by the Lord, and had not lost it, captured by the enticements of the world, he would never have suffered the injuries of so wretched a hardship), therefore, eager to restore and re-form it, established for us, through the office of psalm-singing, a likeness of the heavenly way of life.

Explanation 1, chapter 4

1.4.1CSEL 64:4

Etenim licet omnis scriptura diuina dei gratiam spiret, praecipue tamen dulcis Psalmorum liber, quandoquidem ipse Moyses, qui plano gesta maiorum sermone descripsit, ubi tamen per Mare Rubrum populum patrum memorabili admiratione transduxit, demersum aspiciens regem Pharaonem cum suis copiis, in maiora

For although all divine Scripture breathes the grace of God, the book of Psalms is especially sweet. Moses himself, who described the deeds of the ancestors in plain speech, nevertheless, when he had led the people of the fathers through the Red Sea in a crossing worthy of wonder, seeing King Pharaoh drowned with his forces, raised his genius to greater things,

1.4.2CSEL 64:4–5

ingenium attollens suum, quia maiora uiribus suis fuerat assecutus, canticum domino cecinit triumphale. Maria quoque tympanum sumens ceteras hortabatur dicens: cantemus domino, gloriose enim honorificatus est; equum et ascensorem proiecit in mare. ipse etiam Moyses cum legem domini legisset, quo eius memoriam pectoribus affigeret audientium, per canticum locutus est dicens: audi caelum, et loquar; expectetur sicut pluuia eloquium meum et descendant sicut ros uerba mea, sicut imber super gramen et sicut nix super faenum.

because he had achieved things greater than his own strength, and sang to the Lord a song of triumph. Miriam also, taking a timbrel, urged the other women, saying: "Let us sing to the Lord, for he has been gloriously honored; horse and rider he has thrown into the sea." Moses himself, too, when he had read the law of the Lord, in order to fix its memory in the hearts of the hearers, spoke by means of a song, saying: "Hear, O heaven, and I will speak; let my utterance be awaited like rain, and let my words come down like dew, like a shower upon the grass and like snow upon the hay."

Explanation 1, chapter 5

1.5.1CSEL 64:5

Delectatur igitur cantico deus non solum laudari, sed etiam reconciliari. inde et Moyses tunc maxime cantico usus est, quando caelum testificabatur et terram, ut salutem suam caelestis sono gratiae concinentem auidius mundus audiret et sacrae suauitate dulcedinis in aeternum legis obseruantia mentibus inoleret humanis.

God, then, is delighted by song, not only to be praised but also to be reconciled. That is why Moses made most use of song at the time when he was calling heaven and earth to witness, so that the world might listen more eagerly to its own salvation sounding together with the strain of heavenly grace, and the keeping of the law might be implanted for ever in human minds by the sweetness of a sacred delight.

1.5.2CSEL 64:5

denique legis tabulae priusquam cantico firmarentur, per indignationem Moysi fractae et comminutae sunt; ubi uero tali signaculo consecratae sunt, humana locum ira non habuit, quia sanctificatio eam sacrae suauitatis exclusit. canticum itaque domini sicut ros mollior descendit e caelo et fidem hominum sicut gramen imbre quodam gratiae spiritalis infudit. duo igitur haec cantica in libris Moysi tamquam duo mundi oculi caelique lumina totum corpus operis eius illustrant.

Indeed, before the tablets of the law were confirmed by a song, they were broken and shattered through Moses' indignation; but when they were consecrated with such a seal, human anger had no place, because the sanctification of sacred sweetness shut it out. And so the Lord's song came down from heaven like gentle dew and poured faith into men as a shower of spiritual grace falls on grass. These two songs, then, in the books of Moses, like two eyes of the world and lights of heaven, illumine the whole body of his work.

Explanation 1, chapter 6

1.6.1CSEL 64:5

At uero Dauid principaliter a domino ad hoc munus electus est, ut, quod in aliis rarum praeminere reliquo operi uidetur, in hoc iuge et continuum refulgeret. unum canticum legimus in libro Iudicum, reliqua historiae more decursa, quibus expressa sunt gesta maiorum. unum Esaias canticum scripsit, quo legentium corda mulceret, in reliquis terribili tuba correptionis infremuit.

But David was chosen by the Lord chiefly for this office, so that what in others seems rare and stands out above the rest of their work should shine in him constantly and without break. We read one song in the book of Judges; the rest is told in the manner of history, in which the deeds of the ancestors are set out. Isaiah wrote one song, with which to soothe the hearts of his readers; in the rest he roared with the terrible trumpet of rebuke.

1.6.2CSEL 64:5–6

canticum ei ne ipsi quidem inimici obicere potuerunt, qui eum propter alia dicta usque ad necem sunt persecuti. unum Danihel, unum Habacuc, Salomon ipse Dauid filius, licet innumera cantica cecinisse dicatur, unum tamen quod ecclesia receperit Canticorum canticum dereliquit; scripsit idem Prouerbia. in aliis igitur singula aduertere licet.

Not even his enemies, who persecuted him to death on account of his other sayings, could reproach him for his song. Daniel wrote one, Habakkuk one; Solomon himself, David's son, though he is said to have sung countless songs, left only one that the church has received, the Song of Songs; he also wrote Proverbs. In the others, then, one may notice single instances.

Explanation 1, chapter 7

1.7.1CSEL 64:6

Historia instruit, lex docet, prophetia annuntiat, correptio castigat, moralitas suadet; in libro Psalmorum profectus est omnium et medicina quaedam salutis humanae. quicumque legerit, habet quo propriae uulnera passionis speciali possit curare remedio. quicumque cernere uoluerit, tamquam in communi animarum gymnasio et quodam stadio uirtutum diuersa genera certaminum rep-

History instructs, the law teaches, prophecy announces, rebuke chastises, moral teaching persuades; in the book of Psalms there is the progress of all, and a kind of medicine for human salvation. Whoever reads it has a special remedy with which to heal the wounds of his own passion. Whoever wishes to look into it, finding various kinds of contests made ready, as in a common gymnasium of souls and a sort of stadium of virtues,

1.7.2CSEL 64:6

periens praeparata id sibi eligat, cui se intellegit aptiorem, quo facilius perueniat ad coronam. si quis gesta studet recensere maiorum atque imitari uelit, intra unum psalmum totam paternae historiae seriem accipit conprehensam, ut thesaurum memoriae conpendio lectionis adquirat. faciliora quoque uidentur quae breuius explicantur. illud etiam quantae altitudinis, quod breui interuallo offensionum aduersa distinxit et reconciliationis secunda subtexuit, ut

may choose the one for which he knows himself fitter, so as to reach the crown more easily. If anyone is eager to review the deeds of the ancestors and wishes to imitate them, he receives the whole course of the fathers' history gathered within one psalm, so that he may acquire a treasury of memory in a brief reading. And what is explained more briefly also seems easier. How profound, too, that in a short space he set out the adversities that came from offenses and added the blessings of reconciliation, so that

1.7.3CSEL 64:6

simul cognosceres, quid incredulitatis obesset offensa, quid fides prompta conferret! si quis uim legis explorat, quae tota in uinculo caritatis est — qui enim diligit proximum legem impleuit —, in psalmis legat, quanto dilectionis affectu pro totius plebis obprobrio repellendo periculis se grauibus solus obiecerit; in quo non imparem caritatis gloriam triumpho uirtutis agnoscet. si quis correptionum saeua formidat, audiat dicentem: domine, ne in ira tua arguas me neque in furore tuo

you might learn at once what harm the offense of unbelief does and what ready faith confers! If anyone examines the force of the law, which consists wholly in the bond of love (for "he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law"), let him read in the psalms with what affection of love he alone exposed himself to grave dangers to remove the reproach from the whole people; and in this he will recognize a glory of love not unequal to the triumph of courage. If anyone fears the harshness of rebukes, let him hear one saying: "Lord, do not reprove me in your wrath, nor in your fury

1.7.4CSEL 64:6–7

corripias me et discat, quemadmodum debeat irati iudicis temperare censuram. si quis patientiae cognoscere gestit exemplum, legat in psalmis: si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala et aduertat, quia praeceptum euangelicum spiritu praeuidit, uirtute praeuenit. habes itaque illud prouerbiale, quia mansuetus homo cordis est medicus. si quis praeterea aduersus nequitiae spiritalis incursus uult esse munitus, quid magis quam psallendum sibi esse nouerit? psallebat Dauid adulescentior et Saulis nequam spiritum fugabat, qui eum antea stringebat.

chasten me," and let him learn how he ought to temper the sentence of an angry judge. If anyone longs to know an example of patience, let him read in the psalms: "If I have repaid those who rendered evils to me," and let him note that he foresaw the gospel precept in spirit and anticipated it in virtue. So you have that proverb: "A gentle man is a physician of the heart." And further, if anyone wants to be armed against the assaults of spiritual wickedness, what should he know better than that he must sing psalms? David sang psalms when quite young and put to flight the evil spirit of Saul, which had been gripping him before.

Explanation 1, chapter 8

1.8.1CSEL 64:7

De uirtute autem prophetiae quid loquar? quod alii annuntiauerunt per aenigmata, huic soli palam atque aperte uidetur esse promissum, ut dominus Iesus ex eius semine nasceretur, sicut dixit ad eum dominus: de fructu uentris tui ponam super sedem tuam.

And what shall I say of the power of prophecy? What others announced through riddles seems to have been promised to him alone, plainly and openly: that the Lord Jesus would be born of his seed, as the Lord said to him: "Of the fruit of your womb I will set upon your throne."

1.8.2CSEL 64:7

in psalmis itaque nobis non solum nascitur Iesus, sed etiam salutarem illam suscipit corporis passionem, quiescit, resurgit, ascendit ad caelum, sedet ad dexteram patris. id quod nemo praesumpserit hominum dicere, hoc solus hic propheta annuntiauit, postea ipse dominus in euangelio praedicauit.

So in the psalms Jesus is not only born for us, but also undergoes that saving passion of the body, rests, rises again, ascends to heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father. What no man would have dared to say, this prophet alone announced, and afterwards the Lord himself proclaimed it in the gospel.

Explanation 1, chapter 9

1.9.1CSEL 64:7

Omnes praeterea scriptores psalmorum in suis scriptis exempla posuerunt aut aliqua dicta superiorum; psalmi nihil praeter quod suum est habent. quid igitur psalmo gratius? unde pulchre ipse Dauid: laudate, inquit, dominum, quoniam bonus est psalmus; deo nostro sit iocunda decoraque laudatio. et uere; psalmus enim benedictio populi est, dei laus, plebis laudatio, plausus omnium, sermo uniuersorum, uox ecclesiae, fidei canora confessio, auctoritatis plena deuotio, libertatis laetitia, clamor iocunditatis, laetitiae resultatio. ab iracundia mitigat, a sollicitudine abdicat, a maerore alleuat;

Moreover, all the other writers have placed in their writings examples or some sayings of those before them; the psalms have nothing but what is their own. What, then, is more pleasing than a psalm? So David himself says finely: "Praise the Lord, for a psalm is good; to our God let there be joyful and seemly praise." And truly: for a psalm is the blessing of the people, the praise of God, the commendation of the multitude, the applause of all, the speech of everyone, the voice of the church, the tuneful confession of faith, devotion full of authority, the gladness of freedom, the cry of joy, the echo of gladness. It calms from anger, frees from anxiety, relieves from grief;

1.9.2CSEL 64:7–8

nocturna arma, diurna magisteria, scutum in timore, festum in sanctitate, imago tranquillitatis, pignus pacis atque concordiae, citharae modo ex diuersis et disparibus uocibus unam exprimens cantilenam. diei ortus psalmum resultat, psalmum resonat occasus.

it is armor by night, instruction by day, a shield in fear, a feast in holiness, an image of tranquillity, a pledge of peace and concord, expressing, like a lyre, one song out of different and unlike voices. The rising of the day re-echoes a psalm; its setting resounds with a psalm.

1.9.3CSEL 64:8

Mulieres apostolus in ecclesia tacere iubet, psalmum etiam bene clamant; hic omni dulcis aetati, hic utrique aptus est sexui. hunc senes rigore senectutis deposito canunt, hunc ueterani tristes in cordis sui iocunditate respondent, hunc iuuenes sine inuidia cantant lasciuiae, hunc adulescentes sine lubricae aetatis periculo et temptamento concinunt uoluptatis, iuuenculae ipsae sine dispendio matronalis psallunt pudoris, puellulae sine prolapsione

The apostle bids women keep silent in church, yet they do well to cry out a psalm; it is sweet to every age, fitting for either sex. Old men sing it, laying aside the stiffness of old age; sad veterans answer it in the joy of their heart; young men sing it without reproach of wantonness; youths sing it together without the danger of a slippery age and the temptation of pleasure; young women themselves sing psalms without loss of a matron's modesty; little girls, without lapse

1.9.4CSEL 64:8

uerecundiae cum sobrietate grauitatis hymnum deo inflexae uocis suauitate modulantur. hunc tenere gestit pueritia, hunc meditari gaudet infantia, quae alia declinat ediscere; ludus quidam est iste doctrinae maioris profectus quam cum seria traditur disciplina. quantum laboratur in ecclesia, ut fiat silentium, cum lectiones leguntur! si unus loquatur, obstrepunt uniuersi; cum psalmus legitur, ipse sibi est effector silentii; omnes locuntur et nullus obstrepit.

of modesty, with sober gravity, sing a hymn to God in the sweetness of a modulated voice. Boyhood longs to hold it fast, infancy rejoices to practice it, though it shrinks from learning other things; it is a kind of play of learning, more profitable than when discipline is handed down in earnest. How hard it is in church to get silence when the readings are read! If one person speaks, everyone makes a din; when a psalm is read, it makes its own silence: all speak and no one makes a din.

1.9.5CSEL 64:8

psalmum reges sine potestatis supercilio resultant, in hoc se ministerio Dauid gaudebat uideri; psalmus cantatur ab imperatoribus, iubilatur a populis. certantur clamare singuli quod omnibus proficit. domi psalmus canitur, foris recensetur; sine labore percipitur, cum uoluptate seruatur. psalmus dissidentes copulat, discordes sociat, offensos reconciliat; quis enim non remittat ei, cum quo unam ad deum uocem emiserit? magnum plane unitatis uinculum, in unum chorum totius numerum plebis coire.

Kings sing a psalm aloud without the arrogance of power; David rejoiced to be seen in this ministry. A psalm is sung by emperors, shouted with joy by peoples. Each strives to cry out what profits all. A psalm is sung at home and repeated outside; it is learned without labor and kept with pleasure. A psalm joins those at variance, unites those in discord, reconciles the offended; for who will not forgive one with whom he has lifted a single voice to God? It is truly a great bond of unity, for the whole number of the people to come together into one choir.

1.9.6CSEL 64:8–9

dispares citharae nerui sunt, sed una symphonia. in paucissimis chordis saepe errant digiti artificis, sed in populo spiritus artifex nescit errare. psalmus nocturni operis commercium, diurnae requiei stipendium, institutio incipientium, perfectorum confirmatio, angelorum ministerium, militia caelestis, hostia spiritalis. psalmum et saxa respondent; psalmus canitur et ipsa etiam saxosa pectora molliuntur: uidemus flere praeduros, flecti inmisericordes.

The strings of a lyre are unlike, but the harmony is one. On very few strings the fingers of a craftsman often err, but in the people the Spirit, as craftsman, does not know how to err. The psalm is the exchange of night's work, the wage of daytime rest, the instruction of beginners, the strengthening of the perfect, the ministry of angels, the warfare of heaven, a spiritual sacrifice. Even rocks answer a psalm; a psalm is sung and even rocky hearts are softened: we see the hardest weep and the merciless bend.

Explanation 1, chapter 10

1.10.1CSEL 64:9

Certat in psalmo doctrina cum gratia; simul cantatur ad delectationem, discitur ad eruditionem. nam uiolentiora praecepta non permanent; quod autem cum suauitate perceperis, id infusum semel praecordiis non consueuit elabi. quid est quod non tibi occurrat psalmos legenti?

In the psalm teaching vies with grace; it is sung for delight and learned for instruction. For harsher precepts do not last; but what you have received with sweetness, once poured into the heart, does not usually slip away. What is there that does not meet you as you read the psalms?

1.10.2CSEL 64:9

in his lego canticum pro dilecto et sacrae desiderio caritatis inflammor, in his torcularia diuini mysterii recognosco, in his reuelationum gratiam, resurrectionis recenseo testimonia, repromissionis munera, in his disco uitare peccatum, dedisco erubescere paenitentiam delictorum. tantus rex, tantus propheta suo me prouocauit exemplo, ut aut commissum studeam extenuare peccatum aut non commissum cauere.

In them I read the song for the beloved and am set on fire with longing for sacred love; in them I recognize the winepresses of the divine mystery; in them the grace of revelations; I review the testimonies of the resurrection, the gifts of the promise; in them I learn to avoid sin and unlearn being ashamed of repentance for my offenses. So great a king, so great a prophet has challenged me by his example, that I strive either to lessen a sin committed or to guard against one not committed.

Explanation 1, chapter 11

1.11.1CSEL 64:9

Quid igitur psalmus nisi uirtutum est organum, quod sancti spiritus plectro pangens propheta uenerabilis caelestis sonitus fecit in terris dulcedinem resultare? simul, cum ille in fidibus et chordis, hoc est in reliquiis mortuis diuersarum uocum modulatus discrimina diuinae laudationis ad caelestia dirigeret cantilenam, docuit utique prius nobis peccato esse moriendum et tunc demum in hoc corpore diuersa opera discriminanda uirtutum, quibus ad dominum deuotionis nostrae gratia perueniret, ut occupatis intentione caelestium nulla inreperet terrenorum libido uitiorum, simul animus caelestis gratiae suauitate nitesceret. merito igitur tanti ministrum muneris dominus laudans ait: inueni Dauid secundum cor meum.

What, then, is a psalm but an instrument of the virtues, which the venerable prophet, playing it with the plectrum of the Holy Spirit, made to echo the sweetness of heavenly sound on earth? At the same time, since he directed his song of divine praise to heavenly things on strings and chords, that is, on dead remains, modulating the differences of various notes, he taught us that we must first die to sin, and only then, in this body, distinguish the various works of the virtues, by which the grace of our devotion may reach the Lord; so that, while we are occupied with the pursuit of heavenly things, no lust for earthly vices may creep in, and at the same time the soul may shine with the sweetness of heavenly grace. Rightly, then, does the Lord praise the minister of so great an office, saying: "I have found David after my own heart."

Explanation 1, chapter 12

1.12.1CSEL 64:9–10

Aiunt etiam eorum, qui cithara canunt, peritiores intus canere, ut ferunt fabulae de Aspendio citharista, causas quoque modulaminum et quaedam claustra rhythmorum in superiore parte esse psalterii. docuit ergo Dauid intus nos canere oportere, intus psallere, quemadmodum canebat et Paulus dicens: orabo spiritu, orabo et mente; psallam spiritu, psallam et mente, et ad superiorum intuitum uitam nostram actusque formare, ne delectatio dulcedinis excitet corporis passiones, quibus non redimitur nostra anima, sed grauatur, cum ad redemptionem animae suae psallere se sanctus propheta memorauerit dicens: psallam tibi, deus, in cithara, sanctus Israel. gaudebunt labia mea, cum cantauero tibi, et anima mea quam redemisti. sed iam psalmi istius, qui propositus est nobis, ingrediamur exordia.

They say too that the more skilful of those who sing to the lyre sing inwardly, as the stories tell of the lyre-player of Aspendus, and that the principles of the melodies and certain closures of the rhythms lie in the upper part of the psaltery. So David taught that we must sing inwardly, sing psalms inwardly, as Paul also sang when he said: "I will pray with the spirit, I will pray with the mind also; I will sing psalms with the spirit, I will sing psalms with the mind also"; and that we must shape our life and actions by looking to higher things, lest the delight of sweetness stir up the passions of the body, by which our soul is not redeemed but weighed down; since the holy prophet declared that he sang psalms for the redemption of his soul, saying: "I will sing psalms to you, O God, on the lyre, Holy One of Israel. My lips will rejoice when I have sung to you, and my soul, which you have redeemed." But let us now enter on the opening of this psalm which is set before us.

Explanation 1, chapter 13

1.13.1CSEL 64:10

Beatus, inquit, uir qui non abiit in consilio impiorum. quam aptum, quam oportunum principium! namque ut hi, qui agonis aliquam sollemnitatem receperint exhibendam, proponere praemium solent, iactare coronae nobilitatem, quo certaturi studio maiore conueniant, nisu quoque propensiore decertent, ita dominus noster Iesus regni caelestis gloriam, perpetuae quietis

"Blessed," he says, "is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly." How apt, how timely a beginning! For just as those who have undertaken to stage some solemn contest usually set out the prize and display the splendor of the crown, so that the competitors may gather with greater zeal and contend with more eager effort, so our Lord Jesus has set before human virtue, as its incentives, the glory of the heavenly kingdom, the grace of everlasting rest,

1.13.2CSEL 64:10

gratiam, uitae aeternae beatitudinem ad uirtutis humanae incentiua proposuit. imperator quoque, cum progreditur ad bellum, donatiuum militi et promotiones dignitatum in numeris militaribus pollicetur, ut spes commodi furetur labores et metum abscondat periculi. uelut praeco igitur magni imperatoris sanctus Dauid hortatur milites, athletas uocat, praemium exprimit dicens: beatus uir qui non abiit in consilio impiorum. a praemio coepit, ut pondus futuri certaminis eleuaret, mercedem praemisit, ut unusquisque praesentium rerum sollicitudines ac labores corde transi-

and the blessedness of eternal life. An emperor too, when he goes out to war, promises the soldier a donative and promotions in rank in the military units, so that the hope of gain may steal away the toil and hide the fear of danger. So holy David, like the herald of a great emperor, exhorts the soldiers, calls the athletes, names the prize, saying: "Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly." He began with the prize, to lighten the weight of the contest to come; he put the reward first, so that each one, passing over in his heart the anxieties and toils of present things,

1.13.3CSEL 64:10–11

liens ad emerendam beatitudinem futurorum auida festinatione contenderet. beatus, inquit, uir. quid plus potuit homini donari quam quo nihil amplius potuit deo apostolica auctoritate deferri? beatus enim et solus potens et rex regum et dominus dominantium deus dictus est. ille solus potens, ille rex regum, ille dominus dominantium beatitudinis tamen non supergreditur potestatem; donauit nobis appellationis eius commune consortium, quae digna aestimata est honore diuino.

might strive with eager haste to earn the blessedness of things to come. "Blessed," he says, "is the man." What more could be given to man than that than which nothing greater could be ascribed to God on apostolic authority? For God is called "blessed and only potentate, King of kings and Lord of lords." He who alone is potentate, King of kings, Lord of lords, does not yet go beyond the power of blessedness; and he has given us a common share in that title, which was judged worthy of divine honor.

Explanation 1, chapter 14

1.14.1CSEL 64:11

Consideremus nunc, qua ratione beatus uir dixerit et non magis beati homines, cum uterque sexus uocetur ad gratiam. numquid a consortio beatitudinis exclusit mulieres, quia uirum solum beatum nuncupauit? absit, quia nec a consortio creaturae exclusit deus feminas, quia prius uirum condidit.

Let us consider now for what reason he said "blessed is the man" and not rather "blessed are human beings," since both sexes are called to grace. Did he exclude women from a share in blessedness because he named the man alone blessed? Far from it; for neither did God exclude women from a share in creation because he made the man first.

1.14.2CSEL 64:11

dixit enim deus: faciamus hominem secundum imaginem nostram et secundum similitudinem nostram, et fecit, inquit, deus hominem, ad imaginem dei fecit illum, masculum et feminam fecit eos. in homine uterque signatur, in uiro sexus exprimitur. sed quemadmodum, cum homo dicitur, uterque comprehenditur, ita, cum uir nominatur, et mulier cuius uir ille sit intellegitur.

For God said: "Let us make man according to our image and according to our likeness"; and "God made man," it says, "in the image of God he made him; male and female he made them." In "man" (homo) both are marked; in "man" (uir) the sex is expressed. But just as both are included when "human being" is said, so when "man" is named, the woman whose man (husband) he is is also understood.

1.14.3CSEL 64:11

denique haec uocabitur, inquit, mulier, quoniam de uiro suo sumpta est. accedit illud, quoniam, quorum natura eadem, eorum operationes utique non possunt esse discretae, et quorum opus aequale, eorum utique aequalis et merces. uirum igitur scriptura dicendo consortem copulae non praetermisit, quia et hominem dicendo consortem non tacuit naturae.

Then: "She shall be called woman," it says, "because she was taken from her man." Add this, that those whose nature is the same cannot have separate operations, and those whose work is equal certainly have an equal reward. So when Scripture said "man," it did not pass over his partner in the union, just as in saying "human being" it did not keep silent about his partner in nature.

1.14.4CSEL 64:11

itaque quemadmodum illic hominem factum legimus et, cum sit una natura, tamen principalem sexum prius creatum negare non possumus, ita et hic, cum legimus uirum, de principali portione sexum quoque subparem recognoscimus. paria igitur studia uirtutis, quia par praerogatiua est creaturae. quid autem sexum discutias, ubi non corporis a te, sed animae certamina postulantur, quae sexum non habet? non ergo illic discernas honorem, mercedem diuidas, ubi non discernitur sexus.

So, just as there we read that man was made and, though the nature is one, we cannot deny that the principal sex was created first, so here too, when we read "man," we recognize from the principal part the nearly equal sex as well. Equal, then, are the pursuits of virtue, because equal is the privilege of creation. Why do you examine the sex, where contests not of the body but of the soul are required of you, and the soul has no sex? Do not, then, distinguish honor or divide the reward where sex is not distinguished.

1.14.5CSEL 64:11–12

non incaute tamen, si prior uocetur ad exercitium, qui fuit posterior ad lapsum. quae male coepit, sequi debet, non praecedere; uel post experimentum sit uerecundior. male Eua naturae ordinem praetermisit, expectare debuit praecedentem. astute serpens a posteriore coepit; ideo propheta ad superiorem reuertitur, eum utique qui lapsus non esset, nisi esset posteriorem secutus.

Yet it is not without care that he who was later in the fall is called first to the exercise. She who began badly ought to follow, not to lead; or, after the experience, let her be more modest. Eve did wrong in passing over the order of nature; she ought to have waited for the one who went before. The serpent cunningly began with the later one; so the prophet returns to the earlier, the one who would not have fallen had he not followed the later.

Explanation 1, chapter 15

1.15.1CSEL 64:12

Denique prius nos reuocauit a lapsu quam ad palmam uictoriae prouocauit. beatus, inquit, uir qui non abiit in consilio impiorum. uide, ubi beatus appelleris o homo: non in diuitiis, non in potestatibus et honoribus, non in nobilitate generis aut decore et pulchritudine, non in corporis salubritate, in quibus nihil naturae est bonum; denique non solum facilem commutationem habent in contraria, uerum etiam ministerium ad culpam exhibent ei, qui uti his nesciat. quis enim iustus propter pecuniam, quis humilis in potestatibus, quis misericors propter nobilitatem, quis castus propter decorem? illecebrosa haec magis sunt ad peccatum quam fructuosa ad uirtutis profectum.

So he called us back from the fall before he called us to the palm of victory. "Blessed," he says, "is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly." See where you are called blessed, O man: not in riches, not in powers and honors, not in nobility of birth or comeliness and beauty, not in health of body, in which there is nothing good by nature. Indeed, not only do these change easily into their opposites; they also serve as an instrument of guilt for one who does not know how to use them. For who is just because of money, who humble in high office, who merciful because of nobility, who chaste because of beauty? These things entice to sin more than they bear fruit for progress in virtue.

Explanation 1, chapter 16

1.16.1CSEL 64:12

Quid sibi deinde uult quod maluit dicere: non abiit et non stetit quasi de praeterito, cum potuerit dicere: beatus uir qui non abit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stat et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedet? uide dogma; non enim

What, then, does it mean that he chose to say "has not walked" and "has not stood" as of the past, when he could have said: "Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the ungodly, and does not stand in the way of sinners, and does not sit in the seat of pestilence"? See the teaching: for not

1.16.2CSEL 64:12

statim beatus, qui non est impius aut peccator, propter incerta exitus. non enim otiose scriptum est: ante mortem ne laudaueris aliquem. ergo dum in hac uita quisquam est, non potest definita praedicatione laudari, cum patere adhuc possit errori; ille autem, qui uitam sine offensione concluserit, iure beati appellatione censetur, qui utitur consortio beatorum.

at once is he blessed who is not ungodly or a sinner, because the outcome is uncertain. For it is not idly written: "Before death do not praise anyone." So while anyone is in this life he cannot be praised with a final verdict, since he can still be open to error; but he who has ended his life without stumbling is rightly judged worthy of the name of blessed, for he enjoys the company of the blessed.

Explanation 1, chapter 17

1.17.1CSEL 64:12–13

Sed forte dicas: qua ratione ergo alibi dixit: beatus qui intellegit super egenum et pauperem? non enim dixit beatum qui intellexerit, sed eum qui intellegit. quoniam, qui bonum operantur, in ipso opere et quo probentur inueniunt, remunerationem sui in ipso opere consequentes, siquidem beatae fructus est conscientiae bonum factum. qui autem a malo temperant, non, si semel aut bis declinauerint culpam, statim beati, sed si potuerint culpae contagium per omne tutae suae tempus euadere..

But perhaps you say: For what reason, then, did he say elsewhere: "Blessed is he who considers the needy and the poor"? He did not say blessed is he who has considered, but he who considers. Because those who do good find in the work itself that by which they are approved, obtaining their reward in the work itself, since a good deed is the fruit of a blessed conscience. But those who refrain from evil are not at once blessed if they have avoided a fault once or twice, but only if they have been able to escape the contagion of fault through the whole time of their life.

Explanation 1, chapter 18

1.18.1CSEL 64:13

Nunc illud occurrit, cur beatum dicere maluerit non eum, qui pietatis aliquo sit functus officio, sed eum, qui ab impiorum consilio temperauerit. uidetur enim magis laudandus, qui uirtutis munus impleuerit quam qui peccatum euaserit, siquidem nec bos nec equus nec lapis in peccato esse consueuerit aut sedere in cathedra pestilentiae. sed illa beatitudinis non haber.

Now the question arises why he chose to call blessed not him who has performed some office of piety, but him who has refrained from the counsel of the ungodly. For he who has fulfilled a duty of virtue seems more to be praised than he who has escaped sin, since neither an ox nor a horse nor a stone is accustomed to be in sin or to sit in the seat of pestilence. But those things do not have

1.18.2CSEL 64:13

t fructum, quae uirtutis non habent sensum; nam quomodo perueniunt ad legis praemium quae non habent sequendae legis affectum? de rationabilibus ergo propositam sententiam uideo, hoc est de nobis. nobis autem initium bonorum abstinentia peccatorum est, quoniam legimus: declina a malo et fac bonum. hic enim ordo est disciplinae, ut ab inferioribus ad perfectiora contendas, ne terrearis mole maiorum, qui leuiorum exordio debeas prouocari.

the fruit of blessedness, since they have no sense of virtue; for how do they reach the reward of the law who have no desire to follow the law? So I see that the sentence set before us is about rational beings, that is, about us. And for us the beginning of good things is abstaining from sins, since we read: "Turn aside from evil and do good." For this is the order of discipline: that you strive from lower things to more perfect, lest you be frightened by the bulk of the greater when you ought to be drawn on by beginning with the lighter.

1.18.3CSEL 64:13

scalarum enim similem esse scriptura nos docet pietatis ascensum, per quas uidit angelos domini ascendentes et descendentes sanctus Iacob uir exercitationis, qui nobis propositus est, ut per illum cognosceremus gradum uirtutis paulatim nos proferre debere et ita posse ab imis ad summa contendere, si per processus gradiamur exiguos ad ea, quae uidentur humanae altiora naturae. has tibi scalas semper habeto propositas.

For Scripture teaches us that the ascent of piety is like the ladder on which holy Jacob, the man of exercise, saw the angels of the Lord ascending and descending; he is set before us so that through him we may learn that we must advance a step of virtue little by little, and that we can so strive from the lowest to the highest, if by small advances we go on to things that seem higher than human nature. Keep this ladder always before you.

1.18.4CSEL 64:13–14

ne timeas, o homo, gradus hos ascendere disciplinae. primus gradus uicinus est terrae, sequens similis est prioris. sic per aequales gradus ad summa conscenditur. ne fastidias, o homo, primum illum uelut uilissimum gradum. ille primus ascensus te a terris separat, aerem calcas, ubi ab humo eleuaueris uestigium. in uirtute positus surgendo reliquisti terram; terram relinquis, si culpam declinas. exordium ergo processionis ad uirtutem est abstinere a peccato.

Do not fear, O man, to climb these steps of discipline. The first step is near the earth; the next is like the first. So by equal steps one climbs to the top. Do not despise, O man, that first step as if it were the meanest. That first ascent separates you from the earth; you tread the air when you have lifted your foot from the ground. Set in virtue, by rising you have left the earth; you leave the earth if you turn aside from sin. The beginning of progress toward virtue, then, is to abstain from sin.

Explanation 1, chapter 19

1.19.1CSEL 64:14

Ut sciamus autem hanc disciplinam esse doctrinae, audi legem dicentem: non adulterabis, non homicidium facies; inperfectis enim ista praecepta conuenientia uidebantur. denique ipse dominus Iesus sciens inperfectum, a quo interrogabatur quibus ad uitam aeternam operibus perueniret, respondit ei:

And so that we may know that this is the discipline of the teaching, hear the law saying: "You shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit murder"; for these precepts seemed fitting for the imperfect. Indeed the Lord Jesus himself, knowing that the man who asked him by what works he might attain eternal life was imperfect, answered him:

1.19.2CSEL 64:14

non adulterabis, non homicidium facies, non facies furtum et cetera. deinde dicenti, quod fecisset illa omnia, adiecit perfectiora dicens: uende omnia quae habes et da pauperibus et habebis thesaurum in caelo, tantumque abesse docuit inter malorum declinationem et imitationem bonorum, ut haec abnueret qui illa sibi facilia iudicabat. sed quia nec illa ascenderat, ideo ad haec se aptare non potuit;

"You shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit murder, you shall not steal," and so on. Then, when he said he had done all these things, he added the more perfect, saying: "Sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven"; and he taught that turning away from evil is so far from imitating the good that the man refused the latter who judged the former easy for himself. But because he had not climbed even those, he could not fit himself for these;

1.19.3CSEL 64:14

nam si dilexisset proximum, potuisset pauperibus subsidia sui patrimonii non negare. ideoque gradum primum legis ascende, ut possis ad euangelii caeleste fastigium peruenire. unde arbitror, quod quasi sub lege positus, morem legis in primo psalmo secutus, ex sua persona sanctus propheta magis cauenda denuntiet quam sequenda proponat, in quadragesimo autem psalmo, qui ex persona

for had he loved his neighbor, he could not have refused the poor the help of his patrimony. And so climb the first step of the law, so that you may be able to reach the heavenly summit of the gospel. Hence I think that the holy prophet, as one placed under the law and following the manner of the law in the first psalm, speaking in his own person, declares rather what is to be avoided than proposes what is to be followed; whereas in the fortieth psalm, which is spoken in the person

1.19.4CSEL 64:14–15

dicitur saluatoris, adhortatio magis uirtutis fiat quam erroris repressio; de passione enim saluatoris loquitur. et ideo euangelii dispensator etiam, sicut possumus aestimare, cum audiuimus dicentem: beati misericordes, et psalmo aeque propriae passionis et in euangelio misericordiam coronauit. sed adoriamur iam psalmi explanationem et uirtutem inspiciamus propheticam.

of the Savior, there is rather an exhortation to virtue than a restraint of error; for it speaks of the Savior's passion. And therefore he, as steward of the gospel too, as we may judge when we hear him say: "Blessed are the merciful," crowned mercy both in the psalm of his own passion and in the gospel. But let us now take up the explanation of the psalm and look into its prophetic power.

Explanation 1, chapter 20

1.20.1CSEL 64:15

Beatus, inquit, uir qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. possumus dicere tres esse species peccatorum, quas hic putamus expressas, cogitationis, operationis, permansionis, beatumque eum significari, qui et non cogitauerit quod malum est.

"Blessed," he says, "is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, and has not stood in the way of sinners, and has not sat in the seat of pestilence." We can say that there are three kinds of sins, which we think are expressed here: of thought, of action, of persistence; and that he is meant as blessed who has not even thought what is evil.

1.20.2CSEL 64:15

nam quo modo potest beatus esse, qui suis cogitationibus accusantibus die iudicii reuincendus est? etiamsi hominem fefellit, testem refugit accusatorem euasit, se tamen sui accusatorem uitare non poterit; - quem maxime debet timere, quia et accusatorem habebit et confitentem reum.

For how can he be blessed who, with his own thoughts accusing him, is to be convicted on the day of judgment? Even if he has deceived a man, fled a witness, escaped an accuser, he will not be able to escape himself as his own accuser; and him he ought most to fear, for he will have both an accuser and a confessing defendant.

1.20.3CSEL 64:15

beatus ergo est, qui et non cogitauerit quod malum est et non operatus fuerit peccatum — quia interdum et sine cogitatione delinquimus; ex multiloquio enim non effugimus peccatum — et non perseuerauerit in peccato. uel sic: qui et non cogitauerit quod esset erroris uel in ea cogitatione non steterit uel certe non perseuerauerit in his cogitationibus, quas plenas erroris aduerterit.

Blessed, then, is he who has not thought what is evil, and has not committed sin (for sometimes we offend even without thought; for "in much speaking we do not escape sin"), and has not persisted in sin. Or thus: he who has not thought what belongs to error, or has not stood in that thought, or at least has not persisted in thoughts he perceived to be full of error.

1.20.4CSEL 64:15

sed haec utrum recte conueniant, qui legerit aestimabit. nam qui semel male cogitauit, nec stare in eo debuit nec perseuerare. sed etsi non perseuerauerit, beatus esse non potuit, quia stetit in eo quod improbe cogitauit; etsi non stetit, tamen eo ipso, quod cogitauit male, utrum habeat beatitudinis fructum, clementem aliquem quaerere debet interpretem.

But whether these agree correctly the reader will judge. For he who has once thought evil ought neither to stand in it nor to persist. But even if he did not persist, he could not be blessed, because he stood in what he wickedly thought; and even if he did not stand, yet whether by the very fact that he thought evil he has the fruit of blessedness, he must look for some lenient interpreter.

1.20.5CSEL 64:15

postremo quia nemo potest dicere mundum se habere cor, esto ut ueniabilis cogitatio sit: numquid ueniabilis operatio peccatorum? postremo si ueniabilis statio, numquid etiam plena beatitudinis eo, quod non perseuerat in crimine? deinde qui non cogitauit quae inproba sunt, quomodo in peccato stare potuit aut perseuerare? ut beatus sit, qui tria haec iure seruauerit, certe ordo diuersus est.

Lastly, since no one can say that he has a clean heart, grant that a thought is pardonable: is the doing of sins pardonable? Again, if standing is pardonable, is it also full of blessedness merely because he does not persist in the crime? Then, how could he who did not think wicked things stand in sin or persist in it? For him to be blessed who has rightly kept these three, the order must surely be different.

1.20.6CSEL 64:16

primum est enim, ut non perseueret in peccato, secundum, ut non steterit in eo, tertium, ut non cogitauerit quod esset erroris. qui enim non perseuerauit, potuit tamen stare, qui non stetit, potuit cogitare, qui autem nec cogitauit, uere beatus est.

For the first is not to persist in sin, the second not to have stood in it, the third not to have thought what belongs to error. For he who did not persist could still have stood; he who did not stand could have thought; but he who did not even think is truly blessed.

Explanation 1, chapter 21

1.21.1CSEL 64:16

Unde alteram quoque traditionem non praetermittendam putaui, quo tres gradus recto ordine factos asseramus, ut, qui beatus uult esse, non abeat in consilio impiorum, hoc est in eorum

So I thought that another tradition should not be passed over, by which we may assert that the three steps are made in the right order: that he who wishes to be blessed should not walk in the counsel of the ungodly, that is, should not go about in their

1.21.2CSEL 64:16

cogitationibus non ambulet, deinde non stet in uia peccatorum, tertio non sedeat in cathedra pestilentiae. tu igitur, qui ad ecclesiam factus es christianus, uel tu, qui ad gratiam tendis, abstine ab impiorum consiliis, ut possis dicere: ne perdas cum impiis, deus, animam meam et cum uiris sanguinum uitam meam nec cogites quae sunt impia. quae sunt illa nisi quae in dei excogitantur iniuriam?

thoughts; next, should not stand in the way of sinners; third, should not sit in the seat of pestilence. You, then, who have been made a Christian for the church, or you who are making your way toward grace, abstain from the counsels of the ungodly, so that you may say: "Do not destroy my soul with the ungodly, O God, nor my life with men of blood," and do not think what is ungodly. What are these but things devised to wrong God?

1.21.3CSEL 64:16

pietas enim prima in deum, secunda in parentes. et quidem inimicus inserit frequenter diuersa mentibus nostris et ideo caute propheta cogitationes magis quam infusiones inprouisas putauit ad crimen tenendas. abstinuisti ergo ab impiorum consiliis; recte, non tamen statim beatus. caue etiam, ne in uia peccatorum steteris.

For piety is first toward God, second toward parents. And indeed the enemy often plants various things in our minds; so the prophet cautiously judged that thoughts, rather than sudden suggestions, are to be held as guilt. You have abstained, then, from the counsels of the ungodly; rightly so, yet you are not at once blessed. Take care also not to have stood in the way of sinners.

Explanation 1, chapter 22

1.22.1CSEL 64:16

Quanto examine scripturae diuinae uerba ponuntur! etenim quia omnes sub peccato sumus, non a te exigit quod ultra naturam est, ut peccatum non facias, quia nec unius diei infans sine peccato, sed ut non maneas in peccato quadam statione diuturna. non omnes impii sunt; ideo reuocaris ab omnibus cogitationibus et coniurationibus impiorum; sed omnes peccatores; ideo ammoneris ut desinas peccare. si fueris adulescentioris lapsus aetatis, debet te maturitatis emendare processus.

With what scrutiny the words of divine Scripture are set down! For since we are all under sin, it does not demand of you what is beyond nature, that you commit no sin, for not even an infant of one day is without sin; but that you do not remain in sin by a kind of lasting standing. Not all are ungodly; so you are called back from all the thoughts and conspiracies of the ungodly. But all are sinners; so you are warned to cease from sinning. If you have fallen in the more youthful time of life, the advance of maturity ought to correct you.

1.22.2CSEL 64:16–17

ergo in grauiora non abeas, in leuioribus non stes, habes hoc et in Esaia dictum a domino: exi a Babylone fugiens a Chaldaeis, hoc est: etsi intrasti in confusionem uitiorum, exi. non oportuit intrare, sed ingressus es carnis lege cogente et captiuante te in lege peccati; exi, egredere uel serius, exue te seruitio graui. non potuisti non introire in peccatum per fragilitatem; datur tibi exire peccato per sobrietatem. exi ergo de Babylone fugiens a Chaldaeis. Babylon confusio est, quae uirtutum ordinem non tenet; confusa enim inlecebris mente delinquimus.

So do not go off into graver things; do not stand in lighter ones. You have this also said by the Lord in Isaiah: "Go out from Babylon, fleeing from the Chaldeans"; that is: even if you have entered into the confusion of vices, go out. You ought not to have entered, but you went in under the compulsion of the law of the flesh, which takes you captive in the law of sin. Go out, depart even if late, strip yourself of a heavy slavery. Through frailty you could not avoid entering into sin; it is granted you to go out of sin through sobriety. Go out, then, from Babylon, fleeing from the Chaldeans. Babylon is confusion, which does not keep the order of the virtues; for it is with a mind confused by enticements that we offend.

1.22.3CSEL 64:17

Chaldaei sunt, qui siderum cursus uanae studio superstitionis explorant et impiae serunt gentilitatis errores. ab his fuge, ne te capiant, ne te graui laqueo captiuitatis innectant. Abraham Chaldaeus fuit, sed fugit a Chaldaeis et ante legem; tu sub lege iam natus es, fuge ab impiis. ille hereditatem patrum respuit, ut fidei possideret; tu successionem corporis derelinque, hereditatem deuotionis adquire.

The Chaldeans are those who explore the courses of the stars with the zeal of vain superstition and sow the errors of ungodly paganism. Flee from them, lest they capture you, lest they bind you in the heavy snare of captivity. Abraham was a Chaldean, but he fled from the Chaldeans, and that before the law; you have been born already under the law: flee from the ungodly. He rejected the inheritance of his fathers so as to possess that of faith; you, leave the succession of the body and acquire the inheritance of devotion.

Explanation 1, chapter 23

1.23.1CSEL 64:17

Si autem in peccato non steteris, nec sic beatus; adhuc habes quo carere debeas. multae sunt inlecebrae, multi a uirtute deflexus, grauia inritamenta sunt uoluptatum, grauis fomes auaritiae, cupiditas potestatum, honoris ambitio, quae uelut ueneno quodam mentes hominum et quadam animas pestilenti uitiorum tabe contaminant. haec est cathedra pestilentiae, super quam sederunt scribae et Pharisaei, qui inponunt hominibus onera grauia, ipsi autem digito nolunt ea mouere.

But if you have not stood in sin, even so you are not blessed; there is still something you must be free of. Many are the enticements, many the turnings aside from virtue; heavy are the provocations of pleasures, heavy the tinder of avarice, the desire for power, the ambition for honor, which, as by a kind of poison, defile the minds of men and, by a kind of pestilent wasting of vices, their souls. This is the seat of pestilence, on which the scribes and Pharisees sat, who lay heavy burdens on men but will not themselves move them with a finger.

1.23.2CSEL 64:17–18

has cathedras de templo saluator eiecit eorum, qui se de honore iactarent, primatus quaererent dignitatum, eorum, qui sacerdotio uel primatu honoris uterentur ad quaestum, eorum, qui indulgentes gulae nequaquam debitam continentiae praestarent custodiam. haec uera est pestilentia; denique Heli filii erant filii pestilentiae. in hac quadam sede uitiorum prohibet scriptura nos ceruicem reflectere uiresque totius corporis reclinare. aduerte igitur proprietates.

These seats the Savior cast out of the temple: the seats of those who boasted of honor and sought the primacy of dignities, of those who used the priesthood or the primacy of honor for gain, of those who, indulging their gluttony, by no means kept the guard of continence that was due. This is true pestilence; indeed the sons of Eli were sons of pestilence. On this seat, as it were, of vices Scripture forbids us to bend back our neck and recline the strength of the whole body. Note, then, the precise meanings.

Explanation 1, chapter 24

1.24.1CSEL 64:18

Beatus qui in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra quoque pestilentiae non sedit. uiam dici uitae huius cursum in dubium non uenit, cum ipsa scriptura dicat: in uia hac qua ambulabam absconderunt laqueum mihi, et: esto

"Blessed is he who has not stood in the way of sinners and has not sat in the seat of pestilence." That the course of this life is called a way is not in doubt, since Scripture itself says: "In this way where I was walking they hid a snare for me," and: "Be

1.24.2CSEL 64:18

consentiens aduersario tuo cito, dum es cum illo in uia. etenim quamdiu cursum uitae huius currimus, habemus semitam per quam ambulamus cotidie, donec perueniamus ad finem; etsi non uidemur corporaliter ire, progredimur. nam sicut in nauibus dormientes uentis aguntur in portus, etsi nullus quiescentibus sensus est nauigandi, tamen cursus eos urget ad

agreeable with your adversary quickly, while you are with him on the way." For as long as we run the course of this life, we have a path on which we walk daily until we come to the end; even if we do not seem to go bodily, we advance. For just as those asleep on ships are driven by the winds into harbor, and though they have no sense of sailing while they rest, yet the voyage presses them on to

1.24.3CSEL 64:18

finem et impellit ignaros, sic uitae nostrae spatio defluente ad proprium unusquisque finem cursu latente deducitur. unde dicitur: surge qui dormis - tu enim dormis et tempus tuum ambulat — et uide ne, dum diu dormis, praetereat tempus. ideo, etsi dormis, cor tuum uigilet, cor tuum non ferietur; si cor otiosum non sit, non sunt otiosa tempora tua. in uia es o homo; ambula, ut

the end and drives them on unawares, so, as the span of our life flows away, each one is carried to his own end by a hidden course. Hence it is said: "Rise, you who sleep" (for you are asleep and your time is walking on), and see that while you sleep long your time does not pass by. So, even if you sleep, let your heart keep watch; your heart will not be struck down. If your heart is not idle, your times are not idle. You are on the way, O man; walk, so that

1.24.4CSEL 64:18

peruenias, ne te nox in uia occupet, ne consumatur dies uitae, antequam progressum uirtutis acceleres. uiator es uitae huius, omnia transeunt, omnia post te fiunt, omnia in hac uia cernis et transis. uidisti amoenitatem arborum, herbarum uiriditatem, puritatem fontium et quodcumque huiusmodi, quo delectantur oculi, iuuit spectare: delectauit parumper attendere; dum attendis, pertransisti. iterum, dum ambulas, incidisti scopulosum et confragosum iter, concaua rupium, praerupta montium, densa siluarum:

you may arrive, lest night overtake you on the way, lest the day of life be spent before you hasten your progress in virtue. You are a traveller through this life; all things pass, all things fall behind you; everything on this way you see and pass by. You saw the loveliness of trees, the greenness of grass, the clearness of springs and whatever of this kind delights the eyes: it pleased you to look; it delighted you to pause a little; while you pause, you have passed. Again, as you walk, you have come upon a rocky and rough road, hollow cliffs, steep mountains, dense forests:

1.24.5CSEL 64:18–19

taediasti parum; iterum transisti. talis haec uita est, cuius nec prospera permanent nec aduersa diuturna sunt. ergo quasi in uia locatum neque secunda extollant neque aduersa te frangant nec plausibilia demorentur nec maesta detineant. festina semper ad finem, festina, ut peruenias; elige tamen uiam, antequam curras.

you were wearied a little; again you passed on. Such is this life: neither its prosperity lasts nor its adversity endures. So, as one placed on the way, let neither good fortune lift you up nor adversity break you, neither pleasing things delay you nor sad things hold you back. Hasten always to the end, hasten so that you may arrive; but choose your way before you run.

Explanation 1, chapter 25

1.25.1CSEL 64:19

Duae uiae sunt, una iustorum, altera peccatorum, una aequitatis, altera iniquitatis, de qua dixit propheta: et uide si est uia iniquitatis in me. non solum autem uita nostra uia est, sed etiam ipsa uita nostra aut uirtutis uia est aut iniquitatis. caue igitur, ne in te gressus suos collocet auaritia et sis uia criminis, ne inprobitas, ne libido et sis uia iniquitatis itinerantibus detrita flagitiis. licet tibi eligere quos sequaris, aut iustos aut iniustos.

There are two ways, one of the just, the other of sinners, one of equity, the other of iniquity, of which the prophet said: "And see if there is a way of iniquity in me." Not only is our life a way, but our very life is either a way of virtue or of iniquity. Take care, then, that avarice does not set its steps in you and you become a way of crime; that wickedness or lust does not, and you become a way of iniquity, trodden down by the shameful deeds that travel it. You may choose whom to follow, either the just or the unjust.

1.25.2CSEL 64:19

iustorum uia angustior est, iniustorum latior; illa sobrietatis angustior, haec ebrietatis latior, ut possit capere fluctuantes; haec habet saeculi huius inlecebras, illa habet futurorum praemia. in istis fructus praesentior, in illis spes tardior; quae enim suauia sunt, non differunt diuturnam expectationem, sed praesentem habent perfunctionem, quod autem serium est labore quaeritur, quod beata cogitatione uix capitur, quod oculus non uidit nec auris audiuit quae praeparauit deus diligentibus se.

The way of the just is narrower, that of the unjust broader; the one of sobriety narrower, the other of drunkenness broader, so that it can hold those who stagger; this has the enticements of this world, that has the rewards of things to come. In the one the fruit is more immediate, in the other the hope slower; for what is sweet does not put off a long expectation but has present enjoyment, while what is serious is sought with labor, what is scarcely grasped by blessed thought, what "eye has not seen nor ear heard, which God has prepared for those who love him."

1.25.3CSEL 64:19

difficile solemus credere quae non uidemus et ideo anima aestuat et huc atque illuc uelut oculos quosdam circumfert cogitationes suas. tunc illi occurrunt diuersae rerum species seque offundunt; si ad sempiterna intendat, uirtutem eligit, si ad praesentia, uoluptatem praeponit. graue et iniquum certamen aduersus delectationes praesentium.

We find it hard to believe what we do not see, and so the soul is restless and carries its thoughts this way and that like a kind of eyes. Then various forms of things meet it and press upon it; if it attends to things eternal it chooses virtue, if to things present it prefers pleasure. Heavy and unequal is the contest against the delights of present things.

1.25.4CSEL 64:19–20

hic libertas est cupiditatum, illic seruitutis iniuria facere quae non uis et ab his quae desideraueris abstinere; hic conuiuium, illic ieiunium, hic intemperantia gaudiorum, illic perseuerantia lacrimarum, hic saltatio, illic oratio, hic cantus dulces, illic gemitus graues. scriptum est quidem: cor sapientium in domo luctus et cor stultorum in domo epularum. melius est audire increpationem sapientis magis quam uirum audientem canticum stultorum; sed pauci haec audiunt, pauciores secuntur.

Here there is freedom for the desires; there, the injury of slavery: to do what you do not want and to abstain from what you have desired. Here a banquet, there a fast; here intemperate joys, there persistent tears; here dancing, there prayer; here sweet songs, there heavy groans. It is written indeed: "The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning, and the heart of fools in the house of feasting. It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise than a man hearing the song of fools." But few hear these things, fewer follow them.

1.25.5CSEL 64:20

allicit homines magis dulce peccati, quod ad praesens influit et inpinguat audientis affectum, quam triste uirtutis, quae fidei spem uelut quodam cortice amari laboris inuoluit. beatus ergo atque mirabilis, qui talium uiarum positus in electione non fuerit inlecebris uoluptatis inflexus, ut gradum suum super uadosa et praua constituat; non dicitur ei: qui dereliquisti semitas directas abeundo in uias tenebrarum.

The sweetness of sin, which flows in for the present and fattens the listener's appetite, attracts men more than the bitterness of virtue, which wraps the hope of faith in a kind of rind of bitter toil. Blessed, then, and wonderful is he who, set to choose between such ways, has not been bent by the enticements of pleasure to plant his step on shallows and crooked places; to him it is not said: "You who have left the straight paths by going into ways of darkness."

Explanation 1, chapter 26

1.26.1CSEL 64:20

Cognouimus igitur quae sit peccatorum uia, in qua standum non esse propheta nos ammonet, sed etiam Ecclesiastes docet, qui ait: noli stare in sermone malo, hoc est: non persistere in malis sermonibus, similiter et operibus inprobandis. quomodo in bonis sit standum, sanctus idem propheta praecipit dicens: stantes erant pedes nostri in atriis tuis, Hierusalem.

We know, then, what the way of sinners is, in which the prophet warns us not to stand; and Ecclesiastes too teaches it, saying: "Do not stand in an evil word," that is, do not persist in evil words, and likewise in deeds to be condemned. How one must stand in good things, the same holy prophet directs, saying: "Our feet were standing in your courts, Jerusalem."

1.26.2CSEL 64:20–21

in Hierusalem standum est, de Babylone fugiendum. et Moysi dicitur: tu autem sta mecum, qui de Aegypto fugit et cum domino stans perseuerabat. et in euangelio, qui steterunt usque ad horam undecimam, aequalem mercedem operantibus acceperunt et quae steterant uirgines usque ad aduentum sponsi, ad nuptias simul introire meruerunt, quae autem discesserunt et postea reuerterunt, dominicae excluduntur auctoritate sententiae. didicimus ergo non stare in uia peccatorum, stare autem in uirtutis officio, quia scriptum est: tu autem fide stas.

One must stand in Jerusalem and flee from Babylon. And to Moses it is said: "But you, stand with me"; he fled from Egypt and, standing with the Lord, persevered. And in the gospel those who stood until the eleventh hour received a wage equal to those who worked; and the virgins who stood until the coming of the bridegroom were found worthy to go in together to the wedding, while those who went away and came back afterward are shut out by the authority of the Lord's sentence. We have learned, then, not to stand in the way of sinners, but to stand in the duty of virtue, for it is written: "But you stand by faith."

Explanation 1, chapter 27

1.27.1CSEL 64:21

Nunc consideremus quid sit: et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. et quidem praemittimus, quod non simplex consessus in huiusmodi quod in usu est solio reprehendatur —. quid enim inuidiae haberet ad culpam? - sed cum semper oculi domini super fideles terrae sint, tamquam sub conspectu imperatoris locati et uelut in ministerio quodam positi stare debemus.

Now let us consider what "and has not sat in the seat of pestilence" means. And indeed we state first that it is not simple sitting on the kind of chair in common use that is blamed (for what odium could that bring toward guilt?); but since the eyes of the Lord are always upon the faithful of the earth, we must stand as though placed in the sight of an emperor and set, as it were, in some service.

1.27.2CSEL 64:21

miles in procinctu stat, non sedet, miles in armis non se reflectit, sed excitat atque erigit. ideoque militibus Christi dicitur: ecce nunc benedicite dominum omnes serui domini, qui statis in domo domini. at contra iniquitas in talento plumbeo sedet, eo quod fixa in peccato se ab eo separare non possit. etenim inueterati in errore et studiose flagitiis inhaerentes sedere dicuntur, qui nolunt adsurgere nec audire dicentem: surgite, postquam sederitis.

A soldier ready for battle stands, he does not sit; a soldier under arms does not lean back but rouses and raises himself. So it is said to the soldiers of Christ: "Behold now, bless the Lord, all you servants of the Lord, who stand in the house of the Lord." But iniquity, on the contrary, sits on the talent of lead, because, fixed in sin, it cannot separate itself from it. Indeed those grown old in error and eagerly clinging to shameful deeds are said to sit, who will not rise or hear one saying: "Rise, after you have sat."

1.27.3CSEL 64:21

denique hic ipse propheta alibi ait: sederunt principes et aduersum me detrahebant. an ignoramus, quod tantam uim habeat inueterata consuetudo peccandi, ut excludat naturam, quae, cum sit medicabilis ad salutem, tamen corroboratis tempore passionibus inmedicabilis inuenitur? non ergo permaneamus in uitiis, sed unusquisque, etiamsi fuit, exsiliat a culpa, sicut scriptum est de muliere meretrice: ne intendas in eam oculum tuum, sed exsili, ne moreris, exsili, antequam te anni iuuentutis inueniant.

Indeed this same prophet says elsewhere: "Princes sat and spoke against me." Or do we not know that an inveterate habit of sinning has such force that it shuts out nature, which, though it is curable unto health, yet, when the passions have been strengthened by time, is found incurable? Let us not, then, remain in vices; but let each one, even if he has been there, leap away from guilt, as it is written of the harlot: "Do not fix your eye upon her, but leap away, do not linger; leap away before the years of youth find you."

1.27.4CSEL 64:21–22

sed, quod grauius est, plerique luxuriam corporis nec albenti erubuere canitie et usque ad senectutis aetatem uitam produxere maculosam; intimis enim concepta uisceribus lues culpae processu temporis coacerbatur. caue igitur ab impiorum consiliis; non penetrent huiusmodi consilia mentem tuam, ne dicatur de te: alligabit quis ignem in sinu, uestimenta autem non conburet? etenim qui

But, what is graver, many have followed the luxury of the body, have not blushed even with whitening gray hair, and have prolonged a stained life to old age; for the plague of guilt conceived in the inmost parts grows worse with the passing of time. Beware, then, of the counsels of the ungodly; let such counsels not penetrate your mind, lest it be said of you: "Will anyone bind fire in his bosom and not burn his garments?" For he who

1.27.5CSEL 64:22

semel in sinu mentis flagitii flammam feruentis adoleuerit, cito corporis sui uestimenta conburet. et ut in stipulam ignis exiliens inhaeret ac permanet, donec omne quod corripuit absumat, ita uel exigua scintilla peccati, si quo uitiorum fomite fuerit excitata, incendium grande excitat. noli ergo stare in peccato. postremo posuisti uestigium supra uoraginem culpae; cito aufer pedem, ne supra plantam tibi ascendat pollutio et lapsu faciliore deceptus supra lutum residas.

has once kindled in the bosom of his mind the flame of a burning shameful deed will soon burn the garments of his body. And as fire leaping into stubble clings and stays until it consumes everything it has seized, so even a tiny spark of sin, if fanned by some tinder of vices, kindles a great blaze. Do not, then, stand in sin. If at last you have set your foot over the abyss of guilt, quickly withdraw it, lest pollution rise above your sole and, deceived by an easier slip, you sit down in the mud.

Explanation 1, chapter 28

1.28.1CSEL 64:22

Cauenda ergo prima sunt uitia, ne in plura deinde grauiora proserpant. etenim sicut hi, qui se in luto uersant, quo magis uolutantur, eo amplius inquinantur, ita, qui semel se luto inprobitatis asperserit, nisi ab eo uelociter exiliat, grauius sibi dedecoris sui caenum per singulos dies lutulentae conuersationis obducit.

The first vices, then, must be guarded against, lest they creep on into more and graver ones. For just as those who roll in mud are the more defiled the more they wallow, so he who has once spattered himself with the mud of wickedness, unless he leaps quickly out of it, draws over himself more heavily each day the filth of his disgrace through a muddy way of life.

1.28.2CSEL 64:22

itaque graui odore taetrae illius ac flagitiosae uoraginis contrahitur quaedam animarum pestilentia corruptoque salubrium cogitationum spiramine lues aestuantium passionum miseranda grassatur. hinc letale se mentibus uirus infundit, hinc subrepit aegritudo corporibus, languores animis.

So from the heavy stench of that foul and shameful abyss a kind of pestilence of souls is contracted, and when the breath of wholesome thoughts is corrupted, the pitiable plague of raging passions spreads. From this a deadly poison pours itself into minds; from this sickness creeps into bodies and languor into souls.

1.28.3CSEL 64:22

est enim malus languor erroris languor, auaritiae languor, inexplebilis cupiditatis languor. istae diuitiae sunt, ut dicit Ecclesiastes: est languor malus quem uidi sub sole, diuitias custodiri in malum possidentis eas. dic mihi o Ecclesiastes, qua causa malus hic languor sit. respondebit, quia multos auara spes deuorat. insatiabilis edacitas cupiditatis est; nescii satiari argento qui concupiscit argentum.

For error is an evil languor, avarice a languor, insatiable desire a languor. Such are riches, as Ecclesiastes says: "There is an evil languor which I have seen under the sun: riches kept to the harm of the one who possesses them." Tell me, O Ecclesiastes, why this languor is evil. He will answer: because greedy hope devours many. The voracity of desire is insatiable; those who covet silver do not know how to be satisfied with silver.

1.28.4CSEL 64:22–23

distendunt diuitiae, non explent. etsi quis satiatus fuerit diuitiis, non est, inquit, qui sinat eum dormire. et quidem omnes dies eius in tenebris et luctu et iracundia multa et languore et ira. quomodo enim potest dormire, qui sollicitam auri exercet custodiam, qui damna formidat, qui lucra cogitat, qui usuras computat, qui apothecas numerat? malus ergo languor, qui bonam aufert mentis quietem.

Riches distend; they do not fill. Even if someone is sated with riches, "there is none," it says, "who lets him sleep." And indeed "all his days are in darkness and mourning and much anger and languor and wrath." For how can he sleep who keeps anxious watch over gold, who dreads losses, thinks of gains, reckons interest, counts his storehouses? An evil languor, then, which takes away the mind's good rest.

1.28.5CSEL 64:23

est languor malus luxuria, libido, concupiscentia, delectatio saecularis, ambitio, quae cito corrumpit salutem sobrietatis. omnis postremo mundi huius corruptela pestilentia est. ne ergo tetigeritis, ne attaminaueritis eam: lues est, contaminat; morbus est, polluit. ne gustaueritis quae sunt omnia ad corruptelam ipso usu, ut apostolus dixit, qui et alibi clamat: radix omnium malorum est auaritia.

Luxury, lust, concupiscence, worldly delight, ambition, which quickly corrupt the health of sobriety, are an evil languor. In short, every corruption of this world is a pestilence. "Do not touch it, then, do not defile yourselves with it": it is a plague, it contaminates; it is a disease, it pollutes. "Do not taste the things which all lead to corruption by their very use," as the apostle said, who also cries out elsewhere: "Avarice is the root of all evils."

1.28.6CSEL 64:23

morbos excitat, dolores inserit; denique qui eam appetierunt, inseruerunt se multis doloribus. ista est pestilentia, quae plerumque neque calidos neque frigidos, sed, quod et calidis est deterius et frigidis, tepidos facit, ut euomantur ex ore domini Iesu quos propter grauia peccata reiecerit. ista est quae non paucorum, sed omnium excitat aegritudines. omne caput in dolore, omne cor in maestitia.

It stirs up diseases, implants pains; indeed "those who have desired it have pierced themselves with many pains." This is the pestilence which often makes men neither hot nor cold but, what is worse than hot or cold, lukewarm, so that those whom the Lord Jesus has rejected for grave sins are spewed out of his mouth. This is what stirs up the sicknesses not of a few but of all. "Every head in pain, every heart in sadness."

1.28.7CSEL 64:23

a pedibus usque ad caput peccatorum ulcera. omne caput in dolore, quando sapientes qui aestimantur dolore cruciantur auaritiae. sensus enim sapientis in capite eius; quod referri potest etiam ad ecclesiae praeminentes. omne cor in maestitia, quando sapimus quae sunt carnalia et corporalibus uoluptatibus aciem nostri cordis infodimus. unde ait dominus ad huiusmodi, quod dederit illis cor carneum.

"From the feet to the head, the sores of sinners." Every head is in pain when those who are thought wise are tormented by the pain of avarice. For "the sense of the wise man is in his head"; this may also be referred to those who preside over the church. Every heart is in sadness when we savor fleshly things and bury the sight of our heart in bodily pleasures. Hence the Lord says to such that he has given them a heart of flesh.

Explanation 1, chapter 29

1.29.1CSEL 64:23–24

A pedibus usque ad caput serpit lues dira morborum, quando laborant contagio, quando compatiuntur aliis, si quis effectu libidinis defraudetur, uiduae pudorem expugnare non potuit, agrum inuadere, et aegri cuncti inuicem languores transferunt. quotiens ingemiscunt seniores, quod diu potare non possint! quotiens dolent, quod scortari desierint, cum scortandi habeant uoluntatem! quotiens inter fabulas ebriorum uirtutes probro sunt,

From the feet to the head the dreadful plague of diseases creeps, when men suffer from contagion, when they sympathize with others: if someone is cheated of the fulfilment of his lust, if he could not overcome a widow's chastity or seize a field; and all the sick pass their sicknesses to one another. How often old men groan that they cannot drink long! How often they grieve that they have ceased to go whoring, while they still have the will to whore! How often, amid the talk of drunkards, virtues are a reproach,

1.29.2CSEL 64:24

peccata laudi, honestas ludibrio, continentia risui, misericordia uanitati! isti sunt morbi, qui mala sua in multos transferunt; a paucis corruptela ad omnes peruenit. sedent in conciliis derogantes sobriis, ructantes crapulam, sedent in tabernis de ebrietate certantes, inter hos meretrix plena uino, huic arridens, illum adurens et omnes ardore inflammans libidinis. uerecundus si transeat, erubescit, a singulis carpitur; si flagitiosus, omnium ore laudatur et tamquam morbus transit in animas singulorum;

sins a matter for praise, honor a mockery, continence a joke, mercy folly! These are the diseases that pass their evils on to many; from a few the corruption reaches all. They sit in gatherings disparaging the sober, belching their drunkenness; they sit in taverns competing in drunkenness; among them a harlot full of wine, smiling on this one, burning that one, and inflaming all with the heat of lust. If a modest man passes by, he blushes and is mocked by each of them; if a shameless one, he is praised by every mouth, and like a disease passes into the souls of each;

1.29.3CSEL 64:24

qui enim in flagitiis celebris, plurimos ad imitationem adducit erroris. itaque, dum peccatum imitantur alienum, suum faciunt malum. non sedeas inter eos quos sanctus propheta fugiebat; illum imitare fugientem utique non sedentem, qui ait: non sedi in concilio malignantium et cum iniqua gerentibus non introibo. qua ratione eos fugiebas, Dauid, explica nobis; de-

for he who is famous for shameful deeds draws very many to imitate his error. So, while they imitate another's sin, they make the evil their own. Do not sit among those whom the holy prophet fled; imitate him fleeing and certainly not sitting, who says: "I have not sat in the council of evildoers, and with those who do wicked things I will not go in." Tell us, David, why you fled them;

1.29.4CSEL 64:24–25

monstra has partes, ut et nos eas fugere possimus, ne inficiamur earum contagio. corrupti sunt, inquit, et abominabiles facti sunt, non est qui faciat bonitatem, non est usque ad unum. generaliter ergo ad omnes flagitiosos, demum potest referri specialiter ad inrisores bonorum, quos Aquilas zAevaordg dixit, quod isti uere morbi sunt, qui inridendo bonos plurimum animis operantur errorem mentesque corrumpunt. quanta dixit, a quibus beatus uir debeat abstinere! et adhuc adicit alia.

point out these parts, so that we too may be able to flee them, lest we be infected by their contagion. "They are corrupt," he says, "and have become abominable; there is none who does goodness, not even one." This may be referred generally to all the shameless, then specially to the mockers of the good, whom Aquila called "scoffers"; for these are truly diseases, who by mocking the good work very much error in souls and corrupt minds. How many things he has named from which the blessed man must abstain! And he adds still others.

Explanation 1, chapter 30

1.30.1CSEL 64:25

Sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte, hoc est: beatus ille qui haec faciat consilio ratione prudentia. potest enim et paruulus non per uirtutem, sed per inpossibilitatem et inscientiam delinquendi ab his quae dicta sunt abstinere; potest et inrationabili pecudi conuenire, cui nulla uis consilii, nullus sensus erroris est.

"But in the law of the Lord was his will, and in his law he will meditate day and night"; that is: blessed is he who does these things by counsel, reason and prudence. For even a little child can abstain from the things mentioned, not through virtue but through inability and ignorance of offending; it can also suit an irrational beast, which has no power of counsel and no sense of error.

1.30.2CSEL 64:25

hoc est ergo quartum uel quod sequitur, in quo definitio beati uiri a pecude discernitur, quia uir sapiens subditus legi est uoluntate, non necessitate. plurimum enim refert, quia in uoluntate mercedis est fructus, in necessitate dispensationis obsequium. ita enim docuit nos apostolus dicens: si uolens hoc ago, mercedem habeo; si inuitus, dispensatio mihi credita est. ordo autem conueniens, ut primo diligas legem, secundo ut mediteris. qui diligit, ex uoluntate facit mandata legis, qui timet, inuitus obseruat.

This, then, is the fourth point, or what follows, in which the definition of the blessed man is distinguished from the beast: that the wise man is subject to the law by will, not by necessity. For it makes a great difference: in will lies the fruit of reward, in necessity the obedience of a stewardship. So the apostle taught us, saying: "If I do this willingly, I have a reward; if unwillingly, a stewardship has been entrusted to me." And the fitting order is that you first love the law, second that you meditate on it. He who loves keeps the commandments of the law from will; he who fears observes them unwillingly.

1.30.3CSEL 64:25

hanc disciplinam docendi etiam dei iustitiam in lege accepimus; sic enim scriptum est: audi, Israel: dominus deus tuus deus unus est; et diliges dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et ex tota uirtute tua. et erunt uerba haec, quae ego praecipio tibi hodie, in corde tuo et in anima tua; et demonstrabis ea filiis tuis et loqueris eis sedens et in itinere et in quiete et in uigilia; et alligabis ea in signo in manu tua et erunt monilia ante oculos tuos; et scribes ea super limina in domiciliis tuis et in ianuis tuis.

This discipline of teaching, God's justice too, we have received in the law; for so it is written: "Hear, O Israel: the Lord your God is one God; and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart and in your soul; and you shall show them to your sons and speak of them sitting and on the road and at rest and awake; and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand and they shall be ornaments before your eyes; and you shall write them on the thresholds of your dwellings and on your doors."

1.30.4CSEL 64:25–26

et infra: et nunc, Israel, quid abs te postulat dominus deus tuus quam ut diligas dominum deum tuum et ambules in omnibus uiis eius? Sapientia quoque dicit: concupiscite ergo sermones meos, diligite illos et habebitis disciplinam. clara est et quae numquam marcescat sapientia et facile uidetur ab his qui diligunt illam et inuenitur ab his qui quaerunt illam.

And below: "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you but that you love the Lord your God and walk in all his ways?" Wisdom too says: "Desire, then, my words, love them, and you will have instruction. Wisdom is bright and never fades, and is easily seen by those who love her and is found by those who seek her."

1.30.5CSEL 64:26

legitime ergo docemur a sancto propheta uoluntatem in lege habere, meditationem secundum legem. uoluntas in lege non solum in studio, sed etiam in facto est; prior uoluntas, secunda operatio. denique et dominus dicenti sibi: si uis, potes me mundare respondit: uolo, mundare, quo ostenderet operationibus nostris uoluntatem praeuiam esse debere. denique lex uoluntarios quaerit, quia lex domini inreprehensibilis, conuertens animam, nemo autem conuertitur nisi qui uoluntate conuertitur. uoluntarius autem abscondit et sensum furatur laboris.

Rightly, then, we are taught by the holy prophet to have our will in the law and our meditation according to the law. Will in the law lies not only in zeal but also in deed; first the will, second the working. Indeed the Lord too, to the man who said to him, "If you will, you can make me clean," answered: "I will; be clean," to show that will must go before our works. The law seeks the willing, for "the law of the Lord is blameless, converting the soul," and no one is converted except one who is converted by will. The willing man hides labor and steals away its sense.

Explanation 1, chapter 31

1.31.1CSEL 64:26

Ideoque die et nocte in lege meditatur, in quo non tam continua legendi postulatur intentio quam seruandae legis affectus; ille enim plene meditatur, qui ipse sibi lex est, scriptum in corde suo opus legis intendens. Aquilas tamen diem tantummodo posuit, non etiam noctem; quod non tam a ceteris discrepans quam alio

And so he meditates on the law day and night; in this what is required is not so much a continual effort of reading as a love of keeping the law. For he meditates fully who is a law to himself, attending to the work of the law written in his heart. Aquila, however, put only "day," not also "night"; he put it not so much in disagreement with the others as

1.31.2CSEL 64:26–27

referens posuit, quoniam qui legem meditatur semper in luce est, noctem non habet. etenim cuius lucent opera, non potest utique in tenebris ambulare, quia iustitia eius sicut lumen effulget. meditetur ergo legem uita nostra, meditetur conuersatio, meditetur actus, meditetur intellectus mysteriorum caelestium. lex enim exemplar est et umbra caelestium, umbra futurorum bonorum. qui quae credit in lege in euangelio recognoscit, meditetur in tenebris et die, id est et in aduersis positus et prosperis; lex enim praecipit, ut diligamus dominum. qui diligit, in omni statu suo debet seruare diuturnae caritatis affectum.

referring it to something else, since he who meditates on the law is always in the light and has no night. For he whose works shine cannot walk in darkness, because his justice shines forth like the light. Let our life, then, meditate on the law; let our conduct meditate on it, our actions, our understanding of heavenly mysteries. For the law is the pattern and shadow of heavenly things, the shadow of good things to come. Let him who recognizes in the gospel what he believes in the law meditate in darkness and by day, that is, both when set in adversity and in prosperity; for the law commands us to love the Lord. He who loves must keep the affection of lasting love in every condition.

1.31.3CSEL 64:27

pater diligit filium, diligit etiam cum arguit, diligit etiam cum uerberat baculo; qui enim parcit baculo suo, odit filium suum. nos quoque dominus castigat et diligit. itaque etiam cum digna cohercitione committimus, ille tamen diligit, qui etiam recipit offensum; castigat autem dominus omnem filium quem recipit. et tu cum castigaris dilige, quia ideo castigaris, ut recipiaris.

A father loves his son; he loves him even when he rebukes, loves him even when he beats him with a rod; for "he who spares his rod hates his son." The Lord too chastises us and loves us. So even when we commit what deserves correction, he still loves, who even takes back the offender; "and the Lord chastises every son whom he receives." And you, when you are chastised, love, for you are chastised so that you may be received.

1.31.4CSEL 64:27

nam quid grande est, si tunc diligas dominum deum tuum, cum tibi abundant omnia, cum frueris optatis, cum honoribus facultatibus liberis gaudes? et homini, a quo acceperimus beneficium, gratiam referre consueuimus. denique cum laudaretur Iob iudicio caelesti, hoc retulit diabolus: minime mirum si gratus esset deo, cui tanta subpeteret affluentia prosperorum; sed tunc probandum, si illa amittat uniuersa et pii cultoris praestet officium.

For what great thing is it if you love the Lord your God when you have abundance of everything, when you enjoy your wishes, when you rejoice in honors, means and children? We are used to showing gratitude even to a man from whom we have received a kindness. Indeed when Job was praised by heaven's judgment, the devil answered: no wonder if he was grateful to God, who had such an abundance of prosperity; he must be tested when he loses all of it and still performs the duty of a pious worshipper.

1.31.5CSEL 64:27

haec igitur prima uirtus, ut non frangaris aduersis, non extollaris secundis. id te lex docet, ut in afflictione non relaxes intentionem nec desperationem induas, uictor iam non dicas: uirtus mea et fortitudo mea haec tribuit mihi, sed omnia noueris diuinae misericordiae deputanda.

This, then, is the first virtue: not to be broken by adversity nor lifted up by prosperity. This the law teaches you: in affliction not to slacken your effort or put on despair; and as victor not to say: "My strength and my might have granted me this," but to know that everything is to be credited to God's mercy.

Explanation 1, chapter 32

1.32.1CSEL 64:27–28

Clamat Esaias: non confundetur qui in angustia est usque in tempus. hoc primum bibe. quid est hoc primum bibe? sequestremus mystica, persequamur moralia quae docet littera. propter errorum grauia graues contritiones et uexationes populi dicit futuras, et oportuit eas praecedere, ut sequeretur misericordia. bibe ergo primum tribulationem; per multas enim tribulationes oportet nos

Isaiah cries: "He who is in distress will not be confounded until the time. Drink this first." What is "drink this first"? Let us set aside the mystical sense and follow the moral one which the letter teaches. Because of the grievous errors he says there will be grievous crushings and afflictions of the people, and these had to come first so that mercy might follow. Drink, then, tribulation first; for through many tribulations we must

1.32.2CSEL 64:28

introire in regnum dei. bibe, ut sensus tribulationis pectoris tui infundatur internis, bibe cum patientis affectu maerentis dolorem; cum enim conuersus ingemueris, tunc dominum tibi reconciliabis offensum. hoc ergo primum bibe, ut sis in dolore et angustiis; cito laetitia infundit errorem. pinguis factus et incrassatus populus surrexit ludere et recessit a domino.

enter into the kingdom of God. Drink, so that the sense of tribulation may be poured into the inmost parts of your breast; drink with the patient feeling of one who mourns his grief; for when you have turned and groaned, then you will reconcile the offended Lord to yourself. So drink this first, so as to be in grief and distress; gladness quickly pours in error. The people, grown fat and thick, rose up to play and departed from the Lord.

1.32.3CSEL 64:28

prodest tibi cor habere contritum; hoc primum bibe, ut sacrificium tuum accipiatur a domino. doceat te apostolus, quid sit hoc primum bibe, hoc est tribulationis poculum; tribulatio enim patientiam operatur. non potest esse patientia, nisi ante fuerit tribulatio; tribulatio, inquit, patientiam operatur, patientia autem probationem, probatio uero spem; spes autem non confundit. primum bibe tribulationem, ut postea tibi tot uirtutum pocula

It profits you to have a contrite heart; drink this first, so that your sacrifice may be accepted by the Lord. Let the apostle teach you what "drink this first" is, that is, the cup of tribulation; for tribulation works patience. There can be no patience unless there has first been tribulation: "tribulation," he says, "works patience, patience testing, and testing hope; and hope does not confound." Drink tribulation first, so that afterward so many cups of virtues

1.32.4CSEL 64:28

ministrentur. et ut scias, quia bibitur tribulatio, audisti hodie dicentem prophetam: potasti nos uino conpunctionis, et in posterioribus ait: et potum dabis eis in lacrimis in mensuram. in mensuram petit potum, non supra mensuram, ne ferre non possint. denique quam bono hoc precaretur affectu, suo probabat exemplo, qui potum suum cum fletu miscebat, ut domini in se inclinaret misericordia.

may be served to you. And so that you may know that tribulation is drunk, you heard the prophet today saying: "You have made us drink the wine of compunction," and in later verses he says: "And you will give them drink in tears in measure." He asks for drink in measure, not beyond measure, lest they cannot bear it. And how good a disposition he prayed with he proved by his own example, who mixed his drink with weeping to incline the Lord's mercy toward himself.

Explanation 1, chapter 33

1.33.1CSEL 64:28–29

Bibe ergo hoc primum, ut bibas et secundum — hoc enim tempus est ut inseramus mystica —; bibe primum uetus testamentum, ut bibas et nouum testamentum. nisi primum biberis, secundum bibere non poteris. bibe primum ut sitim mitiges, bibe secundum ut bibendi satietatem haurias. in ueteri testamento conpunctio, in nouo laetitia est.

Drink this first, then, so that you may drink the second too (for this is the time to bring in the mystical sense): drink the Old Testament first, so that you may drink the New Testament too. Unless you have drunk the first, you will not be able to drink the second. Drink the first to soothe your thirst; drink the second to draw the fullness of drinking. In the Old Testament there is compunction, in the New gladness.

1.33.2CSEL 64:29

uide quemadmodum dominus artibus diaboli pro suis seruulis obuiauerit. ille cibo fraudis decepit unum, ut in uno omnes circumueniret; Iesus autem cibo salutis omnes redemit, ut in omnibus et illum, qui deceptus fuerat, reformaret. ille calicem aureum Babylonis excogitauit, ut quicumque plus biberent plus sitirent et, quia potus placere non poterat, auri pretio inliceret ad bibendum.

See how the Lord met the devil's arts on behalf of his servants. He deceived one man with the food of fraud, to ensnare all in one; but Jesus redeemed all with the food of salvation, so that in all he might re-form even him who had been deceived. The devil devised the golden cup of Babylon, so that whoever drank more would thirst more; and since the drink could not please, he enticed men to drink by the value of the gold.

1.33.3CSEL 64:29

propinauit de suo uino, cui metalli suffragia requisiuit; at uero dominus Iesus aquam de petra effudit et omnes biberunt. qui biberunt in typo satiati sunt, qui biberunt in ueritate inebriati sunt. bona ebrietas, quae infunderet laetitiam, non afferret confusionem; bona ebrietas, quae sobriae stabiliret mentis incessum; bona ebrietas, quae uitae munus rigaret aeternae. hoc ergo poculum bibe, de quo dixit propheta: et poculum tuum inebrians quam praeclarum est!

He offered a toast of his own wine, for which he needed the support of the metal; but the Lord Jesus poured water from the rock, and all drank. Those who drank in figure were satisfied; those who drank in truth were made drunk. A good drunkenness, which pours in gladness and brings no confusion; a good drunkenness, which steadies the gait of a sober mind; a good drunkenness, which waters the gift of eternal life. Drink this cup, then, of which the prophet said: "And your cup that makes drunk, how excellent it is!"

1.33.4CSEL 64:29

nec te moueat, quod Babylonis aureum poculum est, quia et tu bibis poculum sapientiae, quae sit auro argentoque pretiosior. utrumque ergo poculum bibe ueteris et noui testamenti, quia in utroque Christum bibis. bibe Christum, quia uitis est, bibe Christum, quia petra est quae uomuit aquam, bibe Christum, quia fons uitae est, bibe Christum, quia flumen est, cuius impetus laetificat ciuitatem dei, bibe Christum, quia pax est, bibe Christum, quia flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae, bibe Christum, ut bibas sanguinem quo redemptus es, bibe Christum, ut bibas sermones eius; sermo eius testamentum est uetus, sermo eius testamentum est nouum.

Do not be troubled that Babylon's cup is golden, for you too drink the cup of wisdom, which is more precious than gold and silver. Drink both cups, then, of the Old and the New Testament, for in both you drink Christ. Drink Christ, because he is the vine; drink Christ, because he is the rock that poured out water; drink Christ, because he is the fountain of life; drink Christ, because he is the river whose stream makes glad the city of God; drink Christ, because he is peace; drink Christ, because rivers of living water will flow from his belly; drink Christ, so that you may drink the blood by which you were redeemed; drink Christ, so that you may drink his words: his word is the Old Testament, his word is the New Testament.

1.33.5CSEL 64:29–30

bibitur scriptura diuina et deuoratur scriptura diuina, cum in uenas mentis ac uires animae sucus uerbi descendit aeterni; denique non in solo pane uiuit homo, sed in omni uerbo dei. hoc uerbum bibe, sed ordine suo bibe, primum in ueteri testamento, cito fac ut bibas et in nouo testamento. et tamquam ipse festinet, dicit: Galilaea gentium et partes Iudaeae, populus qui ambulabas in tenebris, uidete lucem magnam;

Divine Scripture is drunk and divine Scripture is devoured when the juice of the eternal Word goes down into the veins of the mind and the powers of the soul; indeed "man does not live by bread alone, but by every word of God." Drink this word, but drink it in its order: first in the Old Testament; quickly see that you drink also in the New Testament. And as if he himself were in haste, he says: "Galilee of the Gentiles and parts of Judea, people who walked in darkness, see a great light;

1.33.6CSEL 64:30

qui habitatis in regione mortis, lux fulgebit super uos. bibe ergo cito, ut lux tibi effulgeat magna, lux non cotidiana, non diei, non solis, non lunae, sed illa quae umbram mortis excludat. nam qui in umbra mortis sunt, lucem utique solis aut diei uidere non possunt. et quasi requirenti tibi, unde tantus splendor, tanta gratia sit, respondet: quoniam puer natus est nobis, filius datus

you who dwell in the region of death, a light will shine upon you." Drink quickly, then, so that a great light may shine on you: not the daily light, not of the day, not of the sun, not of the moon, but that which shuts out the shadow of death. For those who are in the shadow of death cannot see the light of the sun or of day. And as though you asked whence comes such splendor, such grace, he answers: "For a child is born to us, a son is given

1.33.7CSEL 64:30

est nobis, puer, quia ortus ex uirgine est, filius, quia ex deo natus tantae auctor est lucis. puer nobis natus est, nobis qui credimus, non Iudaeis qui non crediderunt, nobis, non haereticis, nobis, non Manicheis. nobis natus est, quia uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis, nobis natus est qui carnem suscepit ex uirgine, quia homo est natus ex Maria. caro nascitur nobis, uerbum datur; quod nostrum est, inter nos natum est, quod supra nos est, nobis donatum est.

to us": a child, because he arose from a virgin; a son, because, born of God, he is the author of so great a light. A child is born to us, to us who believe, not to the Jews who did not believe; to us, not to heretics; to us, not to Manichees. He is born to us, because "the Word became flesh and dwelt in us"; he is born to us who took flesh from a virgin, because as man he was born of Mary. The flesh is born to us, the Word is given; what is ours was born among us, what is above us was given to us.

Explanation 1, chapter 34

1.34.1CSEL 64:30

Satis excucurrimus, ut putamus, sed non otiose, ut doceremus, quia et in tribulationibus diligere dominum debemus nec recedere ab eo, quoniam et laetitiae tribulatio saepe succedit et laetitia tribulationi. denique qui tribulatione non frangitur et legem sequitur, beatus est.

We have run out far enough, as we think, but not idly, so as to teach that we must love the Lord even in tribulations and not depart from him, since tribulation often succeeds gladness and gladness tribulation. In short, he who is not broken by tribulation and follows the law is blessed.

Explanation 1, chapter 35

1.35.1CSEL 64:30–31

Et erit tamquam lignum quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo, et folium eius non defluet; et omnia quaecumque fecerit prosperabuntur. quae ista beatitudo est quae ligno arboris comparatur, nisi intellegamus in paradiso, illo beatorum loco, lignum uitae in medio lignorum aliorum de terra productum?

"And he will be like the tree that is planted beside the streams of waters, which will give its fruit in its season, and its leaf will not fall; and whatever he does will prosper." What blessedness is this which is compared to the wood of a tree, unless we understand the tree of life in paradise, that place of the blessed, brought forth from the earth in the midst of the other trees?

1.35.2CSEL 64:31

inter multa enim ligna, quae erant speciosa ad aspectum et bona ad escam, etiam hoc lignum terra produxit et in medio paradisi erat, ut cetera ligna eius uiriditate florerent. quod esse hoc lignum dicimus nisi per quod nobis salus uenit? et recte hoc terra produxit, quia eum uirgo generauit, quae erat terra secundum auctoris sententiam quae in eum dicta est: terra es et in terram ibis.

For among the many trees that were beautiful to see and good for food, the earth brought forth this tree also, and it was in the midst of paradise, so that the other trees might flourish with its greenness. What do we say this tree is but that through which salvation came to us? And rightly the earth brought it forth, because a virgin bore him, who was earth according to the Author's sentence spoken against it: "Earth you are, and to earth you will go."

1.35.3CSEL 64:31

pulchre quoque in medio legitur lignorum aliorum, qui erat in medio apostolorum discentium, uel quia in medio erat mentis et cordis, sicut ipse ait: medius uestrum stat quem uos nescitis; et alibi ait: ego autem sum in medio uestrum. denique de ipso et Salomon dixit: lignum uitae est omnibus percipientibus eum.

Finely too it is read "in the midst of the other trees" of him who was in the midst of the apostles as they learned, or because he was in the midst of mind and heart, as he himself says: "In your midst stands one whom you do not know"; and elsewhere he says: "But I am in your midst." Indeed Solomon also said of him: "He is a tree of life to all who lay hold of him."

1.35.4CSEL 64:31

qui ergo beatus est, imitator erit domini Iesu, qui est lignum uitae, lignum sapientiae, plantatum in uterum uirginis uoluntate patris, a quo in perpetuum mansurum plantatur, ut fructum daret in tempore suo. non enim potuit arescere ista plantatio quae habebat ubertatem in se manentem gratiae spiritalis.

He who is blessed, then, will be an imitator of the Lord Jesus, who is the tree of life, the tree of wisdom, planted in the virgin's womb by the Father's will, by whom he is planted to remain for ever, so as to give fruit in his season. For this planting could not wither, which had within it the abiding richness of spiritual grace.

1.35.5CSEL 64:31–32

denique plenus spiritu sancto Iesus regressus est a Iordane. hi sunt decursus aquarum, de quibus dicit in euangelio: flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. hoc autem dicebat de spiritu, quem incipiebant accipere qui credituri erant in eum.

Indeed, "Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan." These are the streams of waters of which he says in the gospel: "Rivers of living water will flow from his belly." This he said of the Spirit, which those who were to believe in him were beginning to receive.

Explanation 1, chapter 36

1.36.1CSEL 64:32

Est et alia traditio, quia sunt aquae de quibus prohibet nos bibere Hieremias dicens: quid tibi et uiae Aegypti, ut bibas aquam Geon? est et Tigris fluuius Assyrios praeterfluens, est et Euphrates in Babyloniam tendens, est et Phison, qui Latina interpretatione dicitur oris commutatio, circumiens terram

There is also another tradition: that there are waters from which Jeremiah forbids us to drink, saying: "What have you to do with the way of Egypt, to drink the water of Gihon?" There is also the river Tigris flowing past the Assyrians, there is the Euphrates stretching toward Babylonia, there is the Pishon too, which in Latin interpretation is called "change of mouth," going around the land

1.36.2CSEL 64:32

Euilat, ubi est aurum, et aurum terrae illius bonum, et lapis carbunculus et lapis prassinus. merito os illic commutatur, ut non teneatur promissorum fides, sed sit in ore dolus, ubi est aurum bonum; auaritia enim fidem frangit nec tenet uerborum simplici-

of Havilah, where there is gold, and the gold of that land is good, and the carbuncle stone and the leek-green stone. Rightly is the mouth changed there, so that the faith of promises is not kept, but there is deceit in the mouth where there is good gold; for avarice breaks faith and does not keep the simplicity

1.36.3CSEL 64:32

tatem, ornamenta quoque pretiosa mentem animumque commutant, ut aliud in pectore, aliud in sermone sit. in illis ergo regionibus fluminum fuerunt Iudaei captiui abducti in Aegyptum et ad Assyrios et ad Babylonios, ubi super flumina Babylonis sedebant et flebant suae calamitatis aerumnam et, ut hic ipse propheta testa-

of words; precious ornaments, too, change the mind and spirit, so that there is one thing in the breast and another in speech. In those regions of the rivers, then, the Jews were led away captive to Egypt and to the Assyrians and to the Babylonians, where they sat by the rivers of Babylon and wept over the hardship of their calamity, and, as this same prophet testifies,

1.36.4CSEL 64:32

tur, illic suspenderunt organa sua et omnem deposuere laetitiam, ubi grauiora tolerarunt. denique reliquae decem tribus ad Assyrios ductae sunt, duae autem Iuda et Beniamin tamquam grauioris reae flagitii in Babyloniam transierunt. atrocius enim sacerdotis filia adultera quam ceterae puniuntur, quia sacerdotalis generis gratiam turpi obprobrio decolorauit.

there they hung up their instruments and laid aside all gladness, where they endured heavier things. In fact the other ten tribes were led to the Assyrians, but the two, Judah and Benjamin, as guilty of a graver crime, passed into Babylonia. For a priest's daughter who commits adultery is punished more severely than other women, because she has discolored the grace of the priestly race with foul disgrace.

Explanation 1, chapter 37

1.37.1CSEL 64:32–33

Sicut illi ergo in temptationibus grauissimis fuerunt, ita multis temptationibus se saluator noster obiecit, ut nulla temptationis nostrae certamina praeteriret. plantatus ergo recte dicitur secus decursus horum fluminum, non in ipsis decursibus, ut finitimum, non demersum intellegas. fuit illi congressio prima carnis et sanguinis. denique ait: pater, transfer a me calicem istum; sed non quod ego uolo sed quod tu uis. fuit diuitiarum obiecta temptatio, cum omnia regna terrae ei inimicus offerret, si procidens dominus adoraret eum. habes duorum fluminum decursus Geon et Phison. fuit illi conluctatio aduersus principes mundi, fuit in ipsa passione certamen aduersus temptatores quos Persas Hebraea appellat interpretatio, qui falsa testimonia deferebant, aduersus eos qui dicebant descendat nunc de cruce, et credimus ei, quae diabolus suggerebat. habes Tigrin et Euphraten flumina.

So, just as they were in the gravest temptations, so our Savior exposed himself to many temptations, so as to pass over none of the contests of our temptation. Rightly, then, he is said to be planted beside the streams of these rivers, not in the streams themselves, so that you may understand him as bordering on them, not submerged. His first encounter was with flesh and blood; indeed he says: "Father, take this cup from me; yet not what I will but what you will." There was the temptation of riches set before him, when the enemy offered him all the kingdoms of the earth if the Lord would fall down and worship him. There you have the streams of two rivers, Gihon and Pishon. He had a struggle against the princes of the world; in the passion itself he had a contest against the tempters, whom the Hebrew interpretation calls "Persians," who brought false testimony, against those who said: "Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe him," which the devil was suggesting. There you have the rivers Tigris and Euphrates.

Explanation 1, chapter 38

1.38.1CSEL 64:33

Quadripertitum autem nobis certamen esse etiam apostolus conprehendit dicens quia non est nobis luctatio aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus principatus et potestates, aduersus mundi huius rectores et tenebrarum, aduersus spiritalia nequitiae quae sunt in caelestibus. hi sunt fluuii qui de paradiso exeunt.

That our contest is fourfold the apostle also includes, saying that "our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world and of darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness which are in the heavenly places." These are the rivers that go out of paradise.

1.38.2CSEL 64:33

unde puto quod is, qui in paradisum gestit redire, hos debeat transire decursus aquarum. quod non otiose expressit idem ipse sanctus propheta, demonstrans quod is, qui temptationes omnes subierit, deberi sibi iam paradisi requiem (speret). itaque sic ait: decursus aquarum descenderunt oculi mei.

Hence I think that he who longs to return to paradise must cross these streams of waters. Not idly did the same holy prophet express this, showing that he who has undergone all temptations may now hope that the rest of paradise is owed him. So he says: "My eyes have gone down streams of waters."

1.38.3CSEL 64:33–34

sicut enim romphaea est in ingressu paradisi ignea, ut qui redit per ignem reuertatur, urat peccata sua, probet aurum suum, ita qui redit per hos decursus redit, meritoque dicunt sancti: transiuimus per ignem et aquam. de istis decursibus et Esaias dicit: si transeas per aquam, flumina non te concludent. quae flumina? audi dicentem Dauid de his qui festinabant ad paradisum: forsitan pertransisset anima nostra aquam intolerabilem.

For just as there is a fiery sword at the entrance of paradise, so that he who returns may return through fire, burn his sins and prove his gold, so he who returns returns through these streams; and rightly the saints say: "We passed through fire and water." Of these streams Isaiah also says: "If you pass through water, the rivers will not shut you in." What rivers? Hear David saying of those hastening to paradise: "Perhaps our soul would have passed through an unbearable water."

Explanation 1, chapter 39

1.39.1CSEL 64:34

Nonnulli de istis quattuor temptationibus etiam illud accipiunt: super aspidem et basiliscum ambulabis et conculcabis leonem et draconem, ut ambulauerit in incarnatione, conculcauerit in passione uel in traditione regni conculcet, quod patri tradet, cum omnem euacuauerit principatum. pulchre autem Aquilas τὸ μεταπεφυτευμένον dixit, hoc est transplantatum, eo quod primo sit plantatus in uirgine, postea transplantatus in paradisum, sicut dixit ad latronem: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso.

Some also take of these four temptations the verse: "You will walk on the asp and the basilisk, and you will tread down the lion and the dragon": that he walked on them in the incarnation and trod them down in the passion, or will tread them down in the handing over of the kingdom, which he will hand over to the Father when he has abolished every principality. Aquila finely said "transplanted," because he was first planted in the virgin and afterwards transplanted into paradise, as he said to the thief: "Amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise."

Explanation 1, chapter 40

1.40.1CSEL 64:34

Hoc lignum igitur fructum dabit in tempore suo. ligna terrena fructum non dare, sed ferre dicuntur, sed lignum uitae ac sapientiae dat fructum, hoc est largitur et donat. rursus illud occurrit: si lignum est sapientiae, cur in tempore dabit et non semper?, ne forte graue sit nobis hoc sentire de Christo. sed tu, qui legisti, quia dispensatorem fidelem et prudentem constituet dominus supra familiam suam, ut det illis in tempore tritici men-

This tree, then, will give its fruit in its season. Earthly trees are said not to give but to bear fruit; but the tree of life and of wisdom gives fruit, that is, bestows and grants it. Again the question arises: if it is the tree of wisdom, why will it give in season and not always? Lest perhaps it be hard for us to think this of Christ. But you who have read that "the Lord will set a faithful and prudent steward over his household, to give them their measure of wheat in season,"

1.40.2CSEL 64:34–35

suram — in tempore utique, non semper —, turbari utique non debes. potest sapientia semper fructum dare, sed, quia sapientia est, debet sapienter dare, dispensare prudenter, si quando nos plenam mensuram aut mereamur aut possimus accipere. sicut hic extremum tempus fructum, ita et illic dabit fructum bonum indigentibus, ut resurrectionis eius consortium capere ac seruare possimus. nunc non possumus, in uitioso saeculo non sustinemus; hic enim corruptela est.

(in season, certainly, not always), you surely ought not to be troubled. Wisdom can always give fruit, but because it is wisdom it must give wisely and dispense prudently, if ever we either deserve or are able to receive the full measure. Just as here the last time gives fruit, so there too he will give good fruit to the needy, so that we may be able to take and keep a share in his resurrection. Now we cannot; in a vicious world we cannot bear it; for here there is corruption.

1.40.3CSEL 64:35

et cauendum fuit, ne corrumperemus bonos fructus quos lignum uitae daret, quia nunc corrupti, illic autem incorrupti, quando et mortui, inquit, resurgent incorrupti et nos commutabimur. oportet enim corruptibile hoc induere incorruptelam et mortale hoc induere inmortalitatem. quid ergo proderat morituro accipere, quod ei mors habebat auferre? nouit ergo sapientia, quibus quando dare debeat, quae nec folium amittit ligni sui. et ideo, quis fructus sit sapientiae, quod folium, consideremus.

And care had to be taken that we should not corrupt the good fruits which the tree of life would give, because now we are corrupt, but there incorrupt, when, he says, "the dead too will rise incorrupt, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality." What good, then, would it have been to one about to die to receive what death would take from him? Wisdom knows, then, to whom and when it should give, and does not lose even the leaf of its tree. And so let us consider what the fruit of wisdom is and what the leaf.

Explanation 1, chapter 41

1.41.1CSEL 64:35

Fructus interior est, folium, quo fructus uel a sole torrenti uel a frigore defendatur. fructus uidetur esse fides, pax, doctrinae excellentia, uerae cognitionis intentio, mysteriorum ratio. hos fructus bona uita custodit, mala, etiamsi percepit, amittit. peccatori autem dixit deus: quare tu enarras iustitias meas? in mysticis fructus est, in moralibus folium contemplatione mysteriorum caelestium.

The fruit is within; the leaf is that by which the fruit is protected from the scorching sun or the cold. The fruit seems to be faith, peace, excellence of doctrine, the pursuit of true knowledge, the understanding of the mysteries. A good life guards these fruits; a bad one loses them even if it has received them. For to the sinner God said: "Why do you recount my justices?" In the mystical things lies the fruit; in the moral things the leaf, by contemplation of the heavenly mysteries.

1.41.2CSEL 64:35

nam uirtutes sine fide folia sunt; uidentur uirere, sed prodesse non possunt, agitantur uento, quia non habent fundamentum. quanti gentiles habent misericordiam, habent sobrietatem, sed fructum non habent, quia fidem non habent! labuntur cito folia, ubi uentus flauerit. et aliqui Iudaei habent castimoniam, sedulitatem lectionis multam et diligentiam, sed sine fructu sunt, sed uersantur ut folia. haec forte sunt folia, quae saluator in illa ficu repperit, sed fructum non repperit.

For virtues without faith are leaves: they seem to be green but cannot profit; they are shaken by the wind, because they have no foundation. How many pagans have mercy and sobriety, but have no fruit, because they do not have faith! Leaves soon fall when the wind blows. And some Jews have chastity, much assiduity and diligence in reading, but they are without fruit; they turn about like leaves. These perhaps are the leaves which the Savior found on that fig tree, but he found no fruit.

Explanation 1, chapter 42

1.42.1CSEL 64:35–36

Mystica saluant et a morte liberant, moralia autem ornamenta decoris sunt, non subsidia redemptionis. praestare autem mystica moralibus etiam ipse dominus docet in euangelio suo dicens de Maria, quae sedens secus pedes domini audiebat uerbum illius, cum Martha circa ministerium festinaret et quereretur, quod soror eam propria circa mensae ministerium non iuuaret: Martha

The mystical things save and free from death; the moral things are ornaments of beauty, not aids to redemption. That the mystical surpasses the moral the Lord himself teaches in his gospel, saying of Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet and heard his word while Martha hurried about the serving and complained that her sister did not help her with serving the table: "Martha,

1.42.2CSEL 64:36

Martha, Maria optimam partem elegit sibi, quae non auferetur illi. si quae Christo ministrabat ad mensam non conferebatur ei quae uerbum cupiebat audire, quem operantem studioso cognitionis aeternae conferre poterimus, ita tamen, ut nec illius operationi fides nec huius cognitioni, sicut Mariae, desit operatio, ne uel folia sine fructu sint uel fructus sine munimentis naturalibus sit intectus et pateat iniuriae?

Martha, Mary has chosen the best part for herself, which will not be taken from her." If she who served Christ at table was not compared with her who longed to hear the word, which man of works shall we be able to compare with one eager for eternal knowledge? Yet in such a way that neither the one's working lacks faith nor the other's knowledge, like Mary's, lacks working, lest either the leaves be without fruit or the fruit be uncovered, without its natural protection, and exposed to harm.

Explanation 1, chapter 43

1.43.1CSEL 64:36

Possumus etiam illud intellegere, quia foliis se texerunt Adam atque Eua corporea uestimenta quaerentes, eo quod resurrectio dominici corporis prophetaretur, quia nec caro, quae antea uice foliorum interire consueuerat, peritura esset in Christo iustorumque omnium, qui secundum euangelium ad imitationem ligni sapientiae nati ex uirgine uitam suam actusque formarent.

We can also understand that Adam and Eve covered themselves with leaves, seeking bodily garments, because the resurrection of the Lord's body was being prophesied: that the flesh, which before used to perish like leaves, would not perish in Christ nor in all the just, who, according to the gospel, would shape their life and actions in imitation of the tree of wisdom born of the virgin.

1.43.2CSEL 64:36

nam Graecus ita dixit: o rov xaQ7iov avxov lJWOSt, quod potest ad beatum referri — (xaxaQioq XOQVZOV <5a>oei Graece —; Latine autem qui dicitur, ut sit: qui beatus dabit fructum in resurrectione sua, quando potest perpetuum dare. potest et sic 8 xov XOQVCOV avrov: vneQ £ vlov, ut referatur ad lignum, cuius facta omnia prosperabuntur. in quo euidens testificatio, quia de saluatore dictum est;

For the Greek says: "which will give its fruit," which can be referred to the blessed man (in Greek "blessed ... will give"), while in Latin it is "which" [the tree], so that the sense is: he who is blessed will give fruit in his resurrection, when he can give it for ever. It can also be taken thus, "its fruit" as of the tree, so that it is referred to the tree, all of whose deeds will prosper. In this there is clear testimony that it was said of the Savior;

1.43.3CSEL 64:36–37

cuius enim nisi ipsius facta possunt uniuersa laudari et prosperos habere exitus? Aquilas autem dirigentur ait, quod et ad quemcumque hominem referendum uidetur quem dirigit dominus fauore caelesti; a domino enim diriguntur gressus uiri et orationem suam in conspectu dei Dauid propheta dirigi postulauit. sed et ipse dominus direxit opera sua, ut nullo erroris curuarentur anfractu.

for whose deeds but his can all be praised and have prosperous outcomes? Aquila, however, says "will be directed," which seems also to be referable to any man whom the Lord directs by heavenly favor; for "a man's steps are directed by the Lord," and the prophet David asked that his prayer be directed in the sight of God. But the Lord himself also directed his works, so that they were bent by no winding of error.

Explanation 1, chapter 44

1.44.1CSEL 64:37

Sequitur: non sic impii, non sic, sed tamquam puluis quem proicit uentus a facie terrae, hoc est: non sic ut beatus uir, qui ideo beatus, quia non abiit in consilio impiorum, quia in peccato non stetit, in concilio pestilentium non sedit uolentium uel credentes pie uel uiuentes peruertere, qui uoluntatem habuit in lege et meditabitur in ea aut, sicut Aquilas posuit, resonabit in lege, ut praecepta legis resonet uita eius, mores resultent, sicut illorum quorum in omnem terram exiuit sonus.

There follows: "Not so the ungodly, not so, but like the dust which the wind drives from the face of the earth"; that is, not so as the blessed man, who is blessed because he has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, because he has not stood in sin, has not sat in the council of the pestilent who wish to pervert those who believe or live piously; who had his will in the law and will meditate on it, or, as Aquila put it, "will resound in the law," so that his life may resound the law's precepts and his conduct echo them, like those whose sound has gone out into all the earth.

1.44.2CSEL 64:37

forte hic sonus doctrinae hominum exeat, illic autem, ubi facie ad faciem dabitur uidere, plenior quaedam uerbi fieri uideatur expressio. non ergo, sicut beatus iste qui haec fecerit, qui erit tamquam lignum plantatum, cuius gesta omnia prosperabuntur, ita erit et impius.

Perhaps here the sound of human teaching goes out, but there, where it will be given to see face to face, a kind of fuller expression of the word seems to come about. Not, then, as this blessed man who has done these things, who will be like a planted tree, all of whose deeds will prosper, so too will the ungodly be.

1.44.3CSEL 64:37

ideo repetiuit uel qui scripsit uel qui postea addidit — ut quidam putant —, quo confirmatior fieret repetita sententia dicendo: non sic impii, non sic, qui erunt tamquam puluis. sunt enim terreni et, sicut puluis proicitur a facie uenti, ita et isti proicientur et dissipabuntur a spiritu sancto, qui terrae fertili atque fecundae animae salutaris sicut uentus auster aspirare consueuit.

So either he who wrote it or he who added it later (as some think) repeated it, so that the sentence might be the firmer for being repeated, saying: "Not so the ungodly, not so," who will be like dust. For they are earthly; and as dust is driven from the face of the wind, so they too will be driven out and scattered by the Holy Spirit, who is wont to breathe on the fertile and fruitful earth of the saved soul like the south wind.

Explanation 1, chapter 45

1.45.1CSEL 64:37–38

Huic uento dicitur in Canticis: ueni, auster, ut clementia aeris mollioris cordis nostri arua laxentur, quae brumali gelu stricta recipiendis gremium seminibus denegabant. bonum est nobis ut hic uentus aspiret, qui naues Tharsis, ferentes uero Salomoni quae ad templum eius necessaria uidentur, tutos deducat in portus.

To this wind it is said in the Song: "Come, south wind," so that, by the mildness of a gentler air, the fields of our heart may be loosened, which, bound by winter frost, refused their lap to the seeds to be received. It is good for us that this wind should blow, which brings safely into harbor the ships of Tarshish, which bear to the true Solomon what seems needed for his temple.

1.45.2CSEL 64:38

sed tunc iste uentus aspirat, si boreas ille grauis uentus flare desierit. ideo uel ecclesia uel anima pia dicit: exurge, borea, et ueni, auster, hoc est: tu, borea, recede et ueni, auster, adspira hortum meum, ut flores non discutias, sed reserues. anima igitur plena pietatis hortum habet uel ipsa hortus est, qui fructus ferat, anima quae impietati patet puluerem habet, qui est infecundus ad fructum. fructiferam illam quidem fecit dominus, sed ipsa sibi collegit impietatis puluerem.

But this wind blows only if that heavy wind, the north wind, has stopped blowing. So either the church or the pious soul says: "Rise up, north wind, and come, south wind," that is: you, north wind, withdraw, and come, south wind, blow upon my garden, not to scatter the flowers but to preserve them. The soul full of piety, then, has a garden or is itself a garden that bears fruit; the soul open to ungodliness has dust, which is barren of fruit. The Lord made it fruitful, but it gathered for itself the dust of ungodliness.

Explanation 1, chapter 46

1.46.1CSEL 64:38

Quid te iactas, o plene impietatis? an quia honoribus es potens et abundas diuitiis? non aduertis, quia puluis es et tu dispergeris et dissipaberis? uidi, inquit, impium superexaltatum et eleuatum super cedros Libani et transiui, et ecce non erat. quid gloriaris, quia multa seruitia ambiunt, multi amici tegunt latera tua, plurimi te equi

Why do you boast, you who are full of ungodliness? Because you are powerful with honors and abound in riches? Do you not notice that you are dust, and will be scattered and dispersed? "I saw," he says, "the ungodly man exalted and lifted above the cedars of Lebanon; and I passed by, and behold, he was not." Why do you glory because many servants throng about you, many friends cover your sides, very many horses

1.46.2CSEL 64:38

secuntur, quorum nobis enarres prosapiam et tamquam maiorum suorum genus? praefers diuitias, quia conuiuiis pascis sodales. utinam egenos pasceres, utinam non iocorum ministros, sed uotorum adiutores! iactas, quia prodeunti ilico ceditur et homines te tamquam ferum declinant aut bestiam. non haec esse aliquid? non audis, quia ea omnia tamquam umbra praetereant? quid iuuant consulares praetextae aut nitentes auro triumphales palmatae?

follow you, whose pedigree you recount to us as if it were the race of their ancestors? You display your riches because you feed your companions at banquets. Would that you fed the needy; would that you fed not the ministers of jests but the helpers of prayers! You boast because people give way at once when you come out, and men avoid you like a wild animal or a beast. Do you not know that these things are nothing? Do you not hear that they all pass away like a shadow? What good are consular robes or triumphal tunics gleaming with gold?

1.46.3CSEL 64:38–39

nudus exibis, nemo illic consulem recognoscet. quid prosunt innumerae possessiones? publicae sunt, non tuae; hodie tu tenes, cras alius. cum tu exieris, alius intrat; uix mouisti pedem, alius gressum intulit. quanti ante te illic fuerunt, quanti post te dominabuntur! et hoc putas esse priuatum? quem umquam a morte diuitiae redemerunt, immo quem non ad mortem diuitiae coegerunt?

Naked you will go out; no one there will recognize a consul. What good are countless possessions? They are public, not yours; today you hold them, tomorrow another. When you go out, another comes in; you have scarcely moved your foot when another has set his step there. How many were there before you, how many will be masters after you! And you think this is private property? Whom have riches ever redeemed from death? Rather, whom have riches not driven to death?

1.46.4CSEL 64:39

quem ab inferis suae reuocarunt opes, quem potentia excusauit a poena? puluis est impietas, sicut puluis est impiorum potentia; caliginem infert, dare salutem non potest. simul ut uehemens flare coeperit spiritus, spargit eam atque dissoluit, aerem turbat, solum nudat; ut puluis proicitur, deficit ut fumus, liquescit ut cera.

Whom have his riches called back from the underworld, whom has power excused from punishment? Ungodliness is dust, as the power of the ungodly is dust; it brings darkness, it cannot give salvation. As soon as a strong wind begins to blow, it scatters and dissolves it, troubles the air, lays bare the ground; like dust it is driven off, it vanishes like smoke, it melts like wax.

Explanation 1, chapter 47

1.47.1CSEL 64:39

Hinc plerique non mediocrem mouerunt quaestionem, utrum perituram naturam uideatur asserere scriptura diuina, maxime quia alibi dicit: comminuam eos ut puluerem ante faciem uenti et ut lutum platearum delebo eos, et alibi: ecce confundentur et reuerebuntur omnes aduersarii; erunt enim tamquam non sint.

Hence many have raised no small question, whether divine Scripture seems to assert that a nature will perish, especially because it says elsewhere: "I will grind them like dust before the face of the wind, and like the mud of the streets I will blot them out," and elsewhere: "Behold, all the adversaries will be confounded and ashamed; for they will be as though they were not."

1.47.2CSEL 64:39

primum ergo interrogo, utrum impietatem secundum naturam putent esse an praeter naturam. si secundum naturam asserant, errare eorum opinionem certum est. denique dicant, utrum naturae peccatum conueniat an non. sed certum est peccare deuiare esse ab eo quod est secundum naturam. quid igitur tam ineptum quam ut dicant minus uideri impium esse quam peccatorem, cum omnium acerbissimum sit quicquid in dei fieri uidetur iniuriam?

First, then, I ask whether they think ungodliness is according to nature or contrary to nature. If they assert it is according to nature, their opinion is certainly mistaken. Let them say whether sin suits nature or not. But it is certain that to sin is to stray from what is according to nature. What, then, is so absurd as for them to say that being ungodly seems a lesser thing than being a sinner, when the bitterest of all is whatever is done to wrong God?

1.47.3CSEL 64:39–40

quodsi impie agere non est praeter naturam, uiuere ergo impie secundum naturam nec peccati loco habendum est nec dignum reprehensione aestimandum; nemo enim reprehenditur qui operatur secundum naturam. unde concluditur, quia impietas praeter naturam est. quomodo igitur cum perditione consuetudinis συναπολλυμένας φύσεις,

But if acting ungodly is not contrary to nature, then living ungodly is according to nature, and is neither to be counted as sin nor judged worthy of blame; for no one is blamed who acts according to nature. Hence it is concluded that ungodliness is contrary to nature. How, then, along with the destruction of the habit, does Scripture introduce "natures perishing together,"

1.47.4CSEL 64:40

hoc est perituras naturas inducit scriptura, cum impietas non utique naturalis sit, sed praeter naturam quod enim non habes, non amittis nec potest ea substantia perire quae non fuit. nam et puluis commotus aut in aquae substantiam transfertur aut in aerem aut in ignem, hoc est: in aliam uidetur saepe transire naturam. non ergo in nihilum deficit, sed in aliud transit.

that is, perishing natures, when ungodliness is certainly not natural but contrary to nature? For what you do not have you do not lose, nor can a substance perish that did not exist. For dust too, when stirred up, is changed either into the substance of water or into air or into fire; that is, it often seems to pass into another nature. It does not, then, vanish into nothing, but passes into something else.

Explanation 1, chapter 48

1.48.1CSEL 64:40

Quid obstat igitur, quin et ille, qui uerbi uirtute et ratione comminuitur ut puluis, non in nihilum dissipetur, sed commutetur in melius, ut ex terreno fiat spiritalis homo et ut lutum platearum sic deleatur, ut tollatur quicquid asperum ac sordidum uidetur, remaneat quicquid planum ac mundum est? et quod ait de aduersariis Hierusalem:

What prevents, then, that he too who is ground like dust by the power and reason of the Word should not be scattered into nothing but changed for the better, so that from an earthly man he becomes a spiritual man, and is blotted out like the mud of the streets in such a way that whatever seems rough and filthy is taken away and whatever is smooth and clean remains? And what he says of the adversaries of Jerusalem,

1.48.2CSEL 64:40

sunt sicut qui non sunt, utique potuit dicere: non erunt. sed cum dixerit: confundentur et reuerebuntur, utique intellegis, quia erunt per substantiam et profectum conuersionis, sed non erunt quasi aduersarii, quod fuerunt. itaque per improbitatis defectum non erunt, erunt fide ac deuotione mutati. denique et alibi ex peccatoris persona dicitur: et iram dei sustinebo, quia peccaui, donec iustificet iudicium meum; conuertere enim deus cupiens peccatorem punit eum et urit, ut purget.

"they are as those who are not," he could surely have said: "they will not be." But since he said: "they will be confounded and ashamed," you surely understand that they will exist in substance and through the progress of conversion, but they will not exist as adversaries, which they were. So through the failing of their wickedness they will not exist; they will exist, changed by faith and devotion. Indeed elsewhere it is said in the person of the sinner: "And I will bear the wrath of God, because I have sinned, until he justifies my cause"; for God, desiring to convert the sinner, punishes him and burns him in order to purify him.

1.48.3CSEL 64:40–41

unde ait: et educet me in lucem. nam et ceram urit ignis, liquescit ut purgetur, et nos per ignem probamur, et fumus consumpto omni materiali expurgatur [et] neque naturam transit. itaque et anima purgata ab omni labe in id quod est deficit, non in id quod non est, ut ait Balaam: moriatur anima mea in anima iustorum, ut moreretur lapsus eius et quidam improbitatis usus, transiret autem in consuetudinem uitamque iustorum; omnia enim deus salua uult esse. unde et Salomon dixit: deus mortem non fecit nec laetatur in perditione uiuorum.

Hence he says: "And he will bring me out into the light." For fire burns wax too, and it melts so as to be purified; and we are tested by fire; and smoke, when all its material is consumed, is purged and does not pass out of nature. So the soul too, purified from every stain, passes away into what is, not into what is not, as Balaam says: "Let my soul die in the souls of the just," so that his fall and a certain practice of wickedness might die, and he might pass into the habit and life of the just; for God wills all to be saved. Hence Solomon also said: "God did not make death, nor does he rejoice in the destruction of the living."

1.48.4CSEL 64:41

fecit animam ut sit, creauit hominem in incorruptionem quem ad imaginem sui fecit; sed homines a naturae munere deuiantes obnoxios fecere se morti, ut quasi terreni corrumpantur. sed deus per tribulationes ad paenitentiam cogit, ut per paenitentiam uratur et consumatur illud accidens malum inprobitatis et pereat et locus ille animae, qui erat accidentis impietatis possessio, pateat ad receptionem uirtutis et gratiae. certum est autem animae naturam esse pretiosam, quae ad similitudinem dei facta receptionem omnis uirtutis admittit, utpote quae cognitionis supernae non sit fraudata consortio.

He made the soul so that it might be; he created man for incorruption, whom he made in his own image; but men, straying from the gift of nature, made themselves liable to death, so that they are corrupted as earthly. But God drives them through tribulations to repentance, so that through repentance that accidental evil of wickedness may be burned and consumed and perish, and that place in the soul which was the possession of accidental ungodliness may lie open to receive virtue and grace. And it is certain that the nature of the soul is precious, which, made in the likeness of God, admits the reception of every virtue, as one not cheated of a share in heavenly knowledge.

Explanation 1, chapter 49

1.49.1CSEL 64:41

Nunc illud superesse arbitramur quod in multorum ore uersatur, qua ratione deus, cuius sine uoluntate nec passer uilissimus cadit et apud quem capilli capitis numerati sunt, dixerit per Esaiam: si omnes gentes ut stillicidium de urceo et sicut momentum staterae aestimatae sunt et ut sputum aestimabuntur. ita ergo peribunt omnes gentes sicut stillicidium de urceo et ut sputum perit et ad nullos usus proficit?

Now there remains, we think, the question that is in many mouths: for what reason God, without whose will not even the cheapest sparrow falls, and with whom the hairs of the head are numbered, said through Isaiah: "If all the nations are counted as a drop from a pitcher and as the turn of a scale, and will be counted as spittle"? Will all the nations, then, perish like a drop from a pitcher, and as spittle perishes and is of no use?

1.49.2CSEL 64:41

sed tu, qui nosti quia gentes non eo usque pro nihilo habuit deus noster, ut et Abrahae dixerit: benedicentur in te omnes gentes per Dauid locutus sit ad filium dicens: dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et infra: omnes gentes seruient ei, qui legisti quia optulit filium suum pro omni gente, ut saluos faceret peccatores, debes hoc loco uim diuinae sententiae considerare.

But you who know that our God did not hold the nations so far for nothing that he said to Abraham too: "In you all nations will be blessed," and spoke through David to the Son, saying: "I will give you the nations as your inheritance," and below: "All nations will serve him"; you who have read that he offered his Son for every nation, to save sinners, ought in this place to consider the force of the divine sentence.

1.49.3CSEL 64:41–42

contemplatione etenim creaturarum caelestium quae multae sunt, sicut caeli, quod multipliciter maius quam terra est, ut a plerisque punctum comparatione caeli terra sit aestimata, angelorum, archangelorum, principatuum et potestatum, thronorum, dominationum, milium et decem milium et innumerabilium milium, contemplatione

For in comparison with the heavenly creatures, which are many: such as heaven, which is many times greater than the earth, so that by most the earth is reckoned a point in comparison with heaven; the angels, archangels, principalities and powers, thrones, dominions, thousands and ten thousands and countless thousands; in comparison

1.49.4CSEL 64:42

ergo horum gentes ut stillicidium de urceo aestimatae sunt, cuius est omnis plenitudo. ex illa igitur plenitudine caelesti tamquam gutta cadens aestimatae sunt gentes. quomodo enim poterant maximae uideri, cum ipsa terra, in qua sunt gentes, minima mundi portio sit et omnium, quae operatus est deus, tamquam staterae exigua inclinatio gentes sint? simul cognosce per hanc stateram omnia deum cum iustitia condidisse et in ipsis gentibus inesse quiddam naturaliter, in quo iustitiae uideretur uel exiguum esse momentum, et sputum ipsum tamquam ex uniuersitate totius corporis interiorem existere portionem.

with these, then, the nations are counted as a drop from a pitcher, of which all is fullness. From that heavenly fullness, then, the nations are counted as a drop falling. For how could they seem very great, when the earth itself, on which the nations are, is the least part of the world, and of all that God has made the nations are like the slight tilt of a scale? At the same time, learn through this scale that God founded all things with justice, and that there is something by nature in the nations themselves in which there seems to be even a slight weight of justice; and that the spittle itself comes, as it were, from the inner part of the whole body.

Explanation 1, chapter 50

1.50.1CSEL 64:42

Magis ergo hic misericordia praedicatur, quoniam, qui uenit quaerere quod perierat, nec stillicidium illud quasi uile contempsit et alleuauit momentum staterae et sputo illi substantiam boni corporis donare dignatus est, id est: gentes omnes in unum corpus ecclesiae congregare. inter gentes autem et Israel annumerari potest nequaquam expers diuinae eius iustitiae, quia ipse Moyses dixit de Israel:

So mercy is rather proclaimed here, since he who came to seek what was lost did not despise that drop as worthless, raised up the turn of the scale, and deigned to give that spittle the substance of a good body, that is, to gather all the nations into the one body of the church. And among the nations Israel too can be counted, by no means without a share in his divine justice, since Moses himself said of Israel:

1.50.2CSEL 64:42–43

ecce populus sapiens et disciplinae tenax gens magna. et scias, quia supra meritum nostrum dei bonitas redundauit, apostolus hunc propheticum locum interpretatus ait: conclusit deus omnia in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur, et subiunxit: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! quis enim cognouit sensum domini? aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? aut quis prior dedit illi, et retribuetur ei? hunc autem locum praemittens propheta ait: si omnes gentes ut stillicidium de urceo aestimatae sunt et reliqua, ut agnoscas intellectum istum cum interpretatione apostolica conuenire.

"Behold a wise people, holding fast to discipline, a great nation." And that you may know that God's goodness has overflowed beyond our merit, the apostle, interpreting this prophetic passage, says: "God has shut up all in unbelief, that he may have mercy on all"; and he added: "O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and his ways past finding out! For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counsellor? Or who has first given to him, and it will be repaid him?" And the prophet, putting this passage first, says: "If all the nations are counted as a drop from a pitcher" and the rest, so that you may recognize that this understanding agrees with the apostle's interpretation.

Explanation 1, chapter 51

1.51.1CSEL 64:43

Sed quid euidentius eo, quod perituras naturas non uideatur inducere, cum ipse subiecerit sanctus propheta: quoniam non resurgunt impii in iudicio? non enim dixit: non resurgunt, sed ait: resurgunt quidem, sed non in iudicio. qui autem resurgit, est utique et manet; sed quia non credidit in Christum, iam iudicatus est et ideo non uenit in iudicium, quem peracti iam manet poena iudicii. et de resurrectione quidem plurima scripturarum sunt testimonia, quae non praetermisimus in libris Consolationis et Resurrectionis.

But what is clearer than that he does not seem to introduce perishing natures, since the holy prophet himself added: "Therefore the ungodly do not rise in judgment"? For he did not say: they do not rise; but he said: they rise indeed, but not in judgment. And he who rises certainly is and remains; but because he did not believe in Christ, he is already judged, and so does not come into judgment, since the penalty of a judgment already made awaits him. And of the resurrection there are very many testimonies of the Scriptures, which we did not pass over in the books On Consolation and On the Resurrection.

1.51.2CSEL 64:43

de eo autem, quod ait: non resurgunt impii in iudicio, secundum euangelium absoluta sententia est, quia non omnes iudicabuntur. apostolus autem ait: omnes enim oportet nos stare ante tribunal Christi, ut recipiat unusquisque propria corporis prout gessit, siue bonum siue malum. haec putant plerique esse contraria nec aduertunt, quia saluator de perfidis dixit atque impiis, qui non crediderunt in dominum Iesum.

As for his saying: "The ungodly do not rise in judgment," according to the gospel the sentence is unqualified, since not all will be judged. But the apostle says: "For we must all stand before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." Many think these contradictory and do not notice that the Savior spoke of the faithless and ungodly, who did not believe in the Lord Jesus.

1.51.3CSEL 64:43–44

sic enim ait: qui credit in me non iudicatur; qui autem non credit iam iudicatus est, quia non credidit in nomine unigeniti filii dei. hoc autem est iudicium, quia uenit lux in hunc mundum et dilexerunt magis homines tenebras quam lucem; erant enim mala ipsorum opera. liquet igitur de quibus dictum sit, hoc est: de his qui non crediderunt in dominum Iesum. apostolus

For he says thus: "He who believes in me is not judged; but he who does not believe is already judged, because he has not believed in the name of the only-begotten Son of God. And this is the judgment, that the light has come into this world and men loved darkness rather than light; for their works were evil." It is clear, then, of whom it was said, that is, of those who did not believe in the Lord Jesus. The apostle

1.51.4CSEL 64:44

quoque, etsi dixit omnes, de his utique dixit qui crediderunt, sed actuum suorum rationem in die iudicii reddituri sunt. denique ipse alibi ait, quia testimonium conscientiae nostrae ad diem iudicii reuelabitur, cum inuicem cogitationes nostrae aut accusabunt se, ut scriptum est, aut defendent et patebunt cordis occulta. quid autem hoc euidentius, quod ait alibi omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur? immutabuntur enim iusti in incorruptionem manente corporis ueritate.

too, though he said "all," certainly said it of those who have believed but will render an account of their actions on the day of judgment. Indeed he himself says elsewhere that the testimony of our conscience will be revealed on the day of judgment, when our thoughts will either accuse one another, as it is written, or defend, and the secrets of the heart will lie open. And what is clearer than his saying elsewhere: "We shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed"? For the just will be changed into incorruption, the reality of the body remaining.

1.51.5CSEL 64:44

Danihel quoque dicit: iudicium sedit et libri aperti sunt. ostendit ergo iudicium futurum, maxime cum alibi idem dicat: multi qui sedent in tumulo terrae exurgent, isti in uitam aeternam et isti in obprobrium et confusionem aeternam; et intellegentes splendebunt sicut splendor caeli et de iustis multi sicut stellae lucebunt.

Daniel too says: "The judgment sat and the books were opened." He shows, then, that there will be a judgment, especially since he says elsewhere: "Many who sit in the mound of the earth will rise, these to eternal life and those to reproach and eternal confusion; and those who understand will shine like the brightness of heaven, and many of the just will shine like the stars."

Explanation 1, chapter 52

1.52.1CSEL 64:44

Quod istud est iudicium sedentium iudicum et qui libri aperti nisi conscientiae nostrae uelut libri peccatorum nostrorum seriem continentes? quamquam hoc ipsum uile sit aestimare quasi humani simile iudicii. aliud est Christi iudicium, ubi conscientia ipsa se prodit, quae latere non potest occultorum arbitrum, ubi cogitationes lucent apud eum qui adhuc cogitantibus dicebat:

What is this judgment of seated judges, and what are the books opened, but our consciences, like books containing the record of our sins? Although it is mean to reckon this as if it were like a human judgment. Christ's judgment is another thing: there conscience itself betrays itself, unable to hide from the judge of secrets; there thoughts shine before him who said to people still thinking them:

1.52.2CSEL 64:44–45

quid cogitatis mala in cordibus uestris? cum Iudaeis diceret, dicebat omnibus, ne quis putaret quod occulta possent esse quae faceret, ne quis putaret quod parietibus clausus testem occulti erroris effugeret. ideoque et euangelista testatur dicens: Iesus autem sciebat cogitationes eorum. quomodo ergo ait: libri aperti sunt? non utique atramento scripti, sed uestigiis delictorum et flagitiorum inquinamento. aperietur liber conscientiae tuae, aperietur liber cordis tui, culpa nostra recitabitur.

"Why do you think evil things in your hearts?" When he said it to the Jews, he said it to all, so that no one might think that what he did could be hidden, no one think that, shut in by walls, he could escape the witness of his secret error. And so the evangelist too testifies, saying: "But Jesus knew their thoughts." How, then, does it say: "the books were opened"? Not written in ink, surely, but by the traces of offenses and the defilement of shameful deeds. The book of your conscience will be opened, the book of your heart will be opened, our guilt will be read out.

1.52.3CSEL 64:45

est ibi liber ubi est tabula, immo sunt libri inscripti ubi sunt inscriptae tabulae, quas inscribit spiritu sancto apostolica doctrina, sicut legimus dicente Paulo epistula nostra uos estis, inscripta non atramento, sed spiritu dei uiui, non in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus. sunt ergo tabulae cordis inscriptae spiritu sancto, istae recitabuntur; si bene egeris, manebit scriptura.

There is a book where there is a tablet; rather, there are books written where there are written tablets, which the apostolic teaching inscribes with the Holy Spirit, as we read when Paul says: "You are our letter, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on fleshly tablets of the heart." There are, then, tablets of the heart written by the Holy Spirit; these will be read out; if you have done well, the writing will remain.

1.52.4CSEL 64:45

uide ne tollas spiritus sancti gratiam, uide ne deleas et scribas atramento flagitia tua, ne ueniat dies iudicii et dicat iudex: recitentur libri, recitentur tabulae gestorum eius et dicat tibi: ego scripsi tabulas tuas; cur delesti apices meos? et ego scripsi dona mea; quomodo delesti munera mea et scripsisti obprobria tua? non legisti quia scribo? non tibi dixi per os prophetae mei: lingua mea calamus scribae uelociter scribentis? iudicium autem uerbi est.

See that you do not take away the grace of the Holy Spirit; see that you do not blot it out and write your shameful deeds in ink, lest the day of judgment come and the judge say: "Let the books be read, let the tablets of his deeds be read," and say to you: "I wrote your tablets; why did you blot out my letters? I wrote my gifts; how did you blot out my gifts and write your disgraces? Did you not read that I write? Did I not say to you through the mouth of my prophet: 'My tongue is the pen of a scribe writing swiftly'?" And the judgment belongs to the Word.

Explanation 1, chapter 53

1.53.1CSEL 64:45

Multi ergo dormientium in tumulo terrae surgent, qui bene egerunt in resurrectionem uitae, qui mala egerunt in resurrectionem iudicii. quod Danihel ait: in uitam aeternam, hoc saluator in resurrectionem uitae dixit; item quod ait Danihel: in obprobrium et confusionem, saluator dixit: in resurrectionem iudicii.

Many, then, of those sleeping in the mound of the earth will rise: those who have done good to the resurrection of life, those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment. What Daniel says, "to eternal life," the Savior called "to the resurrection of life"; again, what Daniel says, "to reproach and confusion," the Savior called "to the resurrection of judgment."

1.53.2CSEL 64:45–46

unde non expedit nobis ad iudicium uenire et non expedit non uenire, ne aut praedamnati uideamur aut in hac labe uitiorum subeamus tanti pondus iudicii. propheta rogat, ne intret dominus in iudicium cum seruo suo; quanto magis nos iudicium domini timere debemus! pone, quia misericors dominus ignoscet; quanta prodentur, quae latere credebam! qui pudor, quae confusio erit, cum, qui alios profitebar docere, ipse in eo deprehendar in quo alios arguebam!

Hence it is not good for us to come to judgment, and it is not good not to come, lest either we seem condemned in advance or, in this stain of vices, undergo the weight of so great a judgment. The prophet asks that the Lord not enter into judgment with his servant; how much more ought we to fear the Lord's judgment! Suppose that the merciful Lord will pardon: how much will be brought to light that I believed was hidden! What shame, what confusion will there be when I, who professed to teach others, am caught myself in what I reproved in others!

Explanation 1, chapter 54

1.54.1CSEL 64:46

Et ideo quoniam et saluator duo genera resurrectionis posuit et Iohannes in Apocalypsi dicens: beatus qui habet partem in prima resurrectione — isti enim sine iudicio ueniunt ad gratiam, qui autem non ueniunt ad primam resurrectionem, sed ad secundam reseruantur, isti urentur, donec impleant tempora inter primam et secundam resurrectionem, aut, si non im-

And so, since the Savior set out two kinds of resurrection, and John too in the Apocalypse, saying: "Blessed is he who has a part in the first resurrection" (for these come to grace without judgment, while those who do not come to the first resurrection but are reserved for the second will be burned until they fulfil the times between the first and the second resurrection, or, if they have not fulfilled

1.54.2CSEL 64:46

pleuerint, diutius in supplicio permanebunt —, ideo ergo rogemus, ut in prima resurrectione partem habere mereamur. sunt qui resurrexerunt in passione Christi et isti plane beati, qui acceperunt Christi gratiam et audierunt uocem eius, de qua scriptum est: uenit hora quando audient mortui uocem filii dei et qui audierint uiuent, et: ingressi sunt in sanctam ciuitatem. puto quod magis illam significet supernam quam istam Hierusalem quam reliquit, quam incusauit, quod in istam pedibus, in illam autem supernam meritis intrauerunt.

them, will remain longer in punishment), therefore let us ask that we may deserve to have a part in the first resurrection. There are those who rose at Christ's passion, and these are plainly blessed, who received Christ's grace and heard his voice, of which it is written: "The hour is coming when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live," and: "They went into the holy city." I think it signifies rather that heavenly city than this Jerusalem, which he left and which he accused; for they entered this one with their feet, but that heavenly one by their merits.

Explanation 1, chapter 55

1.55.1CSEL 64:46–47

Sed et illud caueamus, ut hic positi surgamus de tumulo terrae. sunt qui uiuentes sepulchro sunt circumdati et repleti mortuis, quorum guttur sepulchrum est non loquentium uerba uitae, sed mortis. si hic resurrexerimus a mortuis, et ibi resurgemus; si hic non fuerimus ossa arida, sed acceperimus rorem uerbi, umorem spiritus sancti, et illic uiuemus; si hic nos excitauerit Iesus uoce sua magna, ut excitauit et Lazarum, et per discipulos suos soluerit a uinculis mortis et induxerit in Bethaniam, ubi erat Lazarus, hoc est in domum oboeditionis et adhibuerit conuiuio suo, et illic cum eo semper epulabimur et illic cum eodem recumbemus et illic nobis redolebit unguentum, quod solus proditor dolebat effusum.

But let us beware of this too: that while placed here we rise from the mound of the earth. There are those who, while living, are surrounded by a tomb and filled with the dead, whose throat is a tomb, speaking not words of life but of death. If we rise from the dead here, we shall rise there too; if here we are not dry bones but have received the dew of the Word, the moisture of the Holy Spirit, we shall live there too; if here Jesus has roused us with his loud voice, as he roused Lazarus, and through his disciples loosed us from the bonds of death and led us into Bethany, where Lazarus was, that is, into the house of obedience, and admitted us to his banquet, then there too we shall always feast with him, there too we shall recline with him, and there the ointment will be fragrant for us, whose pouring out only the betrayer lamented.

Explanation 1, chapter 56

1.56.1CSEL 64:47

Ergo impii non resurgunt in iudicio, hoc est: in portionem eorum qui iudicium subituri sunt, nec peccatores surgunt in consilio iustorum. uides quia surgunt impii et non surgunt in iudicio, quia et peccatores, etsi non surgunt in consilio iustorum, resurgunt tamen in iudicio. unde uidentur, qui bene crediderunt et fidem suam etiam operibus exsecuti sunt, ipsi non iudicari, sed surgere in consilio iustorum; peccatores autem, qui non possunt inter iustos surgere, surgent in iudicio.

"Therefore the ungodly do not rise in judgment," that is, into the portion of those who are to undergo judgment, "nor sinners in the council of the just." You see that the ungodly rise and do not rise in judgment, since sinners too, though they do not rise in the council of the just, yet rise in judgment. Hence it seems that those who believed rightly and carried out their faith in works are themselves not judged but rise in the council of the just; while sinners, who cannot rise among the just, will rise in judgment.

1.56.2CSEL 64:47

habes duos ordines; tertius superest impiorum, qui quoniam non crediderunt iam iudicati sunt et ideo non surgunt in iudicio, sed ad poenam; dilexerunt enim magis tenebras quam lucem ideo iudicium eorum poena est et forte poena tenebrarum. et poterat quidem intellegi, quod hi, qui mala opera habent credentes tamen in Christum, uolentes quidem recte uiuere, sed uicti inlecebris peccatorum, dilexerunt plus tenebras quam lucem, id est: utrumque dilexerunt, sed magis tenebras.

You have two orders; there remains a third, that of the ungodly, who, since they did not believe, are already judged, and so rise not in judgment but to punishment; for they loved darkness rather than light; so their judgment is punishment, and perhaps the punishment of darkness. And indeed it could be understood that those who have evil works while believing in Christ, wanting indeed to live rightly but overcome by the enticements of sins, loved darkness more than light, that is, loved both, but darkness more.

1.56.3CSEL 64:47

sed quia de illis praemisit qui non crediderunt, sic accipiendum puto, quod dilexerunt tenebras et non lucem; lux enim Christus. qui ergo non crediderunt luci, absurdum est ut lucem uel dilexisse credantur quam nescierunt; nescierunt enim neque intellexerunt, in tenebris ambulant, sicut scriptum est.

But since he spoke first of those who did not believe, I think it must be taken thus: that they loved darkness and not light; for the light is Christ. It is absurd, then, that those who did not believe the light should be thought to have loved even a little the light they did not know; for "they did not know nor understand; they walk in darkness," as it is written.

Explanation 1, chapter 57

1.57.1CSEL 64:47–48

Sequitur: quoniam nouit dominus uiam iustorum, et iter impiorum peribit. aduerte sensum: non resurgunt impii in iudicio, quoniam nouit dominus uiam iustorum. uias eorum utique nouit, quorum dirigit gressus; sunt enim gressus hominum qui a domino diriguntur. diriguntur a domino et uiae uiri. has nouit dominus uias quae sunt rectae, quae ad illam uitam tendunt dicentis:

There follows: "For the Lord knows the way of the just, and the path of the ungodly will perish." Note the sense: the ungodly do not rise in judgment, because the Lord knows the way of the just. He certainly knows the ways of those whose steps he directs; for there are steps of men that are directed by the Lord. The ways of a man too are directed by the Lord. The Lord knows these ways which are straight, which lead to that life of him who says:

1.57.2CSEL 64:48

ego sum uia et ueritas et uita. haec bona est uia, tortuosa autem est uia saeculi; non dignatur illam uiam nosse. illos enim cognoscit qui sunt ipsius, qui operantur opera eius; qui autem operantur iniquitatem, his dicit dominus: discedite a me omnes operarii iniquitatis; non noui uos. non per ignorantiam, sed per id, quod indigni sint scientia dei, nesciuntur.

"I am the way and the truth and the life." This is the good way; but the way of the world is crooked; he does not deign to know that way. For he knows those who are his, who do his works; but to those who work iniquity the Lord says: "Depart from me, all you workers of iniquity; I do not know you." Not through ignorance, but because they are unworthy of God's knowledge, are they not known.

Explanation 1, chapter 58

1.58.1CSEL 64:48

Pulchre autem ait: et iter impiorum peribit. separauit Latinus, ut iter diceret, et tamquam discreuit iter a uia; Graecus autem in utroque uiam dixit. non otiose tamen Latinus, quia et dominus ego sum uia dixit, non dixit ego sum iter. perire autem iter impiorum dixit, non impios; seruat eorum substantiam, qui si conuertantur solum iter impietatis amittent, quod nec ab initio fuit nec erit. quod accidens igitur est perit, quod substantiuum, manet. pereunt autem ita impii, quomodo dicitur: anima quae peccat ipsa morietur, ut peccati aculeo, non omni substantiae suae dissolutione moriantur.

Finely he says: "and the path of the ungodly will perish." The Latin made a distinction, so as to say "path," and as it were distinguished path from way; but the Greek said "way" in both places. Yet not idly the Latin, since the Lord too said "I am the way," he did not say "I am the path." And he said that the path of the ungodly perishes, not the ungodly; he preserves their substance, so that, if they are converted, they will lose only the path of ungodliness, which neither was from the beginning nor will be. What is accidental, then, perishes; what is substantial remains. And the ungodly perish in the way in which it is said: "The soul that sins shall itself die," so that they die by the sting of sin, not by a total dissolution of their substance.

Explanation 35, chapter 1

35.1.1CSEL 64:48–49

Dicturus propheta in psalmo sequenti, quae esset forma iusti, ante formam expressit iniusti. neque enim possumus cognoscere, quae sit forma iustitiae, nisi cognoscamus, quae sit iniquitatis effigies; sunt enim sibi aduersae atque contrariae. namque in altera simplex habitudo naturae, in altera fallax uersutia nequitiae; alia uirtutum imagines praefert, alia uitiorum commenta praetendit.

The prophet, about to say in the following psalm what the pattern of the just man is, expressed first the pattern of the unjust. For we cannot know what the pattern of justice is unless we know what the likeness of iniquity is; for they are opposed and contrary to each other. In the one there is the simple disposition of nature, in the other the deceitful cunning of wickedness; the one displays images of the virtues, the other holds out the fictions of the vices.

35.1.2CSEL 64:49

conuenire autem ordinem hunc et ipsa ratio docet et, si de contrariis sumenda sunt testimonia, ipsi doctores philosophiae confessi sunt, dum secuntur. quis autem dubitet longe anteriorem Dauid Platonis fuisse temporibus, quem non solum magister eius, sed nec aui quidem auorum eius uidere potuerunt, cum ille in principio regni fuerit Iudaeorum, quod per innumera annorum curricula propagatum est, iste post tempora captiuitatis, quibus regnum gentis eius iam fuerat dissolutum?

That this order is fitting, reason itself teaches; and, if testimony is to be taken from opponents, the teachers of philosophy themselves have acknowledged it, while following it. And who would doubt that David was far earlier than the times of Plato, whom not only Plato's teacher but not even the grandfathers of his grandfathers could have seen, since David was at the beginning of the kingdom of the Jews, which was continued through countless courses of years, and Plato after the times of the captivity, when the kingdom of his nation had already been dissolved?

35.1.3CSEL 64:49

ergo ipse, qui tenet in omnes saecularis sapientiae principatum, cum diceret non posse formam iustitiae comprehendi, nisi ante discutiendam iniustitiae seriem putauissent, exemplum attulit, quod hi, qui uelint aurum quaerere, prius se luto obliniant. aurum itaque iustitia, iniquitas lutum est. quod a nostris quoque dictum esse non dubium est, cum scriptum sit: ut lutum platearum delebo eos; et uere lutum, quia eos inquinat qui sibi appropinquauerint.

So he himself, who holds the first place among all in worldly wisdom, when he said that the pattern of justice could not be grasped unless they first thought the course of injustice must be examined, offered the example that those who want to seek gold first smear themselves with mud. Justice, then, is the gold, iniquity the mud. That this was also said by our writers is not in doubt, since it is written: "Like the mud of the streets I will blot them out"; and truly mud, since it defiles those who come near it.

35.1.4CSEL 64:49–50

fugiamus ergo iniustitiam, ne luteis sordibus inquinemur atque in eius uoraginem non pes noster exterior, sed, quod est grauius, mens nostra mergatur. et philosophia quidem aurum se quaerere dicit, sed lutum uersat, quae diuinitatem quaerit in statuis; sed uasa figuli uirga confringit. nos aurum quaerimus, quo corpora nostra mundemus, mortificationem Iesu Christi in corpore nostro circumferentes, ut et uita Iesu Christi in corpore nostro manifestetur. bonum aurum sanguis est Christi, diues ad pretium, profluus ad lauandum omne peccatum. ordinem diximus; titulum consideremus.

Let us flee injustice, then, lest we be defiled with muddy filth, and lest not our outward foot but, what is graver, our mind be sunk in its abyss. Philosophy indeed says it seeks gold, but it handles mud, seeking divinity in statues; but the rod breaks the vessels of the potter. We seek the gold with which to cleanse our bodies, carrying about in our body the dying of Jesus Christ, so that the life of Jesus Christ may also be manifested in our body. Good gold is the blood of Christ, rich in value, flowing abundantly to wash away every sin. We have spoken of the order; let us consider the title.

Explanation 35, chapter 2

35.2.1CSEL 64:50

In finem, inquit, seruo domini psalmus Dauid. in toto psalterii corpore solus hic titulus est, quo psalmum seruo domini se scripsisse testetur. quis iste est seruus domini? uideamus, quid psalmi series significet, cui dictus hic psalmus sit. audiamus ad quem loquatur: domine, inquit, in caelo misericordia tua et ueritas tua usque ad nubes: iustitia tua sicut montes dei, iudicia tua sicut abyssus multa.

"To the end," it says, "for the servant of the Lord, a psalm of David." In the whole body of the psalter this is the only title by which he testifies that he wrote a psalm for the servant of the Lord. Who is this servant of the Lord? Let us see what the course of the psalm indicates, to whom this psalm is spoken. Let us hear to whom he speaks: "Lord," he says, "your mercy is in heaven and your truth reaches to the clouds; your justice is like the mountains of God, your judgments like a great abyss."

35.2.2CSEL 64:50

cui hoc nisi filio dei dicitur? haec enim non humanae, sed diuinae sunt potestatis. sed quid sibi uult, quod seruo domini dici psalmum hunc titulus declarauit, cum orationem Moysi hominis dei maluerit quam serui domini in posteriore titulo nuncupare? quod ergo consilium prophetae fuerit non intellego uel potius ipsius domini saluatoris, qui locutus est in propheta.

To whom is this said but to the Son of God? For these belong not to human but to divine power. But what does it mean that the title declared that this psalm is spoken to the servant of the Lord, when in a later title it preferred to name a prayer of "Moses the man of God" rather than of the servant of the Lord? What the prophet's purpose was, then, I do not understand, or rather the purpose of the Lord the Savior himself, who spoke in the prophet.

35.2.3CSEL 64:50

uere iudicia eius sicut abyssus multa, ut seruo honorificentiam reseruaret, sibi condicionem seruitutis adscriberet. uideor mihi intellegere, uideor hausisse aliquid de gratia spiritali. aduersus iniustitiam, ut diximus, psalmus hic scriptus est et ideo plus graua-

Truly his judgments are like a great abyss: that he reserved honor for the servant and ascribed to himself the condition of servitude. I seem to myself to understand, I seem to have drawn something of spiritual grace. This psalm, as we have said, was written against injustice; and so the injustice of the faithless is made the heavier,

35.2.4CSEL 64:50

tur iniustitia perfidorum, qui Christum Iesum dominum recipere noluerunt, cum ille propter illos susceperit seruitutem. quid enim tam iniquum quam ingratos tantis fuisse beneficiis, ut, quibus ille salutem daret, hi sanguinem eius effunderent? denique alibi, cum de sua passione loqueretur, ad acerbandam Iudaicae impietatis inuidiam sic ait: ne auertas faciem tuam a puero tuo; quoniam tribulor, uelociter exaudi me. pauper et dolens ego sum.

who refused to receive Christ Jesus the Lord, since he took on servitude for their sake. For what is so unjust as to have been ungrateful for such great benefits, so that those to whom he gave salvation shed his blood? Indeed elsewhere, speaking of his passion, to sharpen the odium of the Jewish ungodliness, he says thus: "Do not turn your face from your servant; for I am afflicted, hear me speedily. I am poor and in pain."

Explanation 35, chapter 3

35.3.1CSEL 64:50–51

Ueni, Paule, interpretare nobis, qua ratione dominus caeli atque terrarum se pauperem dixerit, quae sit ista paupertas. tu certe illum diuitem dixisti; quomodo idem diues et pauper est? audiamus testimonium Pauli: scitis, inquit, gratiam domini nostri Iesu Christi, quia propter uos pauper factus est, cum diues esset, ut uos eius inopia ditaremini.

Come, Paul, interpret for us for what reason the Lord of heaven and earth called himself poor, what this poverty is. You certainly called him rich; how is the same one rich and poor? Let us hear Paul's testimony: "You know," he says, "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that for your sakes he became poor, though he was rich, so that by his poverty you might become rich."

35.3.2CSEL 64:51

ueni et tu, Esaias, interpretare nobis, quomodo se dolentem dixerit Christus, qui dolores uulnerum sanare consueuit. medicus uenit, ut curaret aegrotos: quid ipse habuit quod doleret? audiamus etiam Esaiae testimonium: pro nobis, inquit, dolet, et nos aestimauimus eum esse in doloribus.

Come you too, Isaiah, interpret for us how Christ, who was used to healing the pains of wounds, called himself in pain. The physician came to cure the sick: what had he that pained him? Let us hear Isaiah's testimony also: "He is in pain for us," he says, "and we thought him to be in pains."

35.3.3CSEL 64:51

expressit medici affectum, qui, etiamsi ipse nullum uulnus habuit quod doleret, tamen conpassus est uulneratis. hoc igitur in psalmo dominus exprobrat Iudaeis: ego propter uos pauper, ego pro uobis dolens, et uos mihi manus impias intulistis dicentes: tollamus iustum, quia inutilis est nobis. iniciamus lignum in panem eius. bene panem dicit pro carne eius; ille alimentum detulit, isti pro beneficio retulere supplicium.

He expressed the feeling of a physician, who, even if he himself had no wound to pain him, yet suffered with the wounded. This, then, the Lord reproaches the Jews with in the psalm: "I became poor for you, I am in pain for you, and you laid ungodly hands on me, saying: 'Let us take away the just one, for he is useless to us. Let us throw wood into his bread.'" Well does he say "bread" for his flesh; he brought nourishment, they in return for the kindness repaid him with punishment.

35.3.4CSEL 64:51

non mirum ergo si esuriunt, qui sibi uitae aeternae alimoniam denegarunt. pulchre etiam duo ista iunxerunt: iniciamus lignum in panem eius; nesciebant quid loquerentur Iudaei et mysterium loquebantur. paradisum nobis crux reddidit Christi; hoc est lignum, quod Adae dominus demonstrauit dicens de ligno uitae, quod esset in medio paradisi, edendum, de ligno autem scientiae boni et mali non edendum. errauit Adam, mandata non tenuit, interdictum gustauit;

No wonder, then, if they hunger who denied themselves the nourishment of eternal life. Finely, too, they joined these two: "Let us throw wood into his bread"; the Jews did not know what they were saying and spoke a mystery. The cross of Christ has given paradise back to us; this is the tree which the Lord showed Adam, saying that the tree of life, which was in the midst of paradise, was to be eaten, but the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was not to be eaten. Adam erred, did not keep the commands, tasted the forbidden;

35.3.5CSEL 64:51–52

per lignum coepimus esurire, quoad caro suum accepit alimentum. ideo dominus in Christo carnem iunxit et lignum, ut fames antiqua cessaret, uitae gratia redderetur. beatum lignum domini, quod omnium peccata crucifixit, beata caro domini, quae uictum omnibus ministrauit!

through a tree we began to hunger, until the flesh received its nourishment. So the Lord in Christ joined flesh and wood, so that the ancient hunger might cease and the grace of life be restored. Blessed the tree of the Lord, which crucified the sins of all; blessed the flesh of the Lord, which supplied food to all!

Explanation 35, chapter 4

35.4.1CSEL 64:52

De paupertate igitur et dolore domini idonea, ut arbitror, sanctorum protulimus testimonia, quorum alter uidit et dixit, alter est electus ut diceret. ipsorum igitur qui probati sunt de seruitute domini testimonia iterum proferamus, immo sua, quae de se ipse locutus est in utroque. audiamus ergo quid dicat: sic dicit dominus qui finxit me seruum ex utero sibi ad congregandum Iacob et Israel ad eum. aduer-

On the Lord's poverty and pain, then, we have brought forward, I think, fitting testimonies of the saints, of whom one saw and spoke, the other was chosen to speak. Let us bring forward again the testimonies of these approved men about the Lord's servitude, or rather his own, which he himself spoke of himself in both. Let us hear, then, what he says: "Thus says the Lord who formed me from the womb as his servant, to gather Jacob and Israel to him."

35.4.2CSEL 64:52

timus ergo, quod propter congregationem populi formam susceperit seruitutis. audi, Iudaee: et de gratia contumeliam fers et hoc ad perfidiam deriuas, propter quod magis credere debuisti. ad te uocandum uenit, et conuiciaris. ex utero seruum dixit. audi, Arriane, ex quo utero; paululum supra recurre: ex utero, inquit, matris meae uocauit dominus nomen meum. quod nomen eius sit, audiamus, quo eum pater uocauit: ecce uirgo in utero accipiet et pariet filium et

We note, then, that he took the form of a servant for the gathering of the people. Hear, O Jew: you turn even grace into insult and divert to faithlessness the very thing for which you ought rather to have believed. He came to call you, and you revile him. He said "servant from the womb." Hear, Arian, from what womb; run back a little above: "From the womb of my mother," he says, "the Lord called my name." Let us hear what his name is, by which the Father called him: "Behold, a virgin will conceive in the womb and bear a son, and

35.4.3CSEL 64:52

uocabitur nomen eius Emmanuel, quod interpretatur: nobiscum deus. quod enim aliud nisi filius dei nomen est Christi? accipe aliud. dixerat quidem et Gabriel ad Ioseph de Maria: pariet filium, et uocabis nomen eius Iesum. accipe dei uocem: et tu, Bethleem Iudaeae, non es minima inter principes Iuda;

his name will be called Emmanuel, which is interpreted: God with us." For what other name of Christ is there but Son of God? Take another. Gabriel indeed had said to Joseph of Mary: "She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus." Take the voice of God: "And you, Bethlehem of Judea, are not least among the princes of Judah;

35.4.4CSEL 64:52–53

ex te enim exiet princeps, qui regat populum meum. aduerte mysterium: ex utero uirginis idem et seruus exiuit et dominus, seruus ad operandum, dominus ad imperandum, ut regnum deo in hominum mentibus radicaret; uterque unus, non alter ex patre et alter ex uirgine, sed idem, qui ante saecula ex patre, ipse postea carnem suscepit ex uirgine. ideo ergo et seruus uocatur et dominus, propter nos seruus, sed unitate diuinae substantiae deus ex deo, princeps ex principe, aequalis ex aequali; neque enim degenerem genuit in quo se ipse conplacere memorauit.

for from you will come forth the prince who will rule my people." Note the mystery: from the virgin's womb the same one came forth both servant and Lord, servant to work, Lord to command, so as to root God's kingdom in men's minds; both one, not one from the Father and another from the virgin, but the same, who before the ages was from the Father, himself afterwards took flesh from the virgin. Therefore he is called both servant and Lord: servant for our sake, but by the unity of the divine substance God from God, prince from prince, equal from equal; for he did not beget a degenerate son, in whom he declared that he was well pleased.

Explanation 35, chapter 5

35.5.1CSEL 64:53

Magnum, inquit, tibi est uocari puerum meum, ut statuas tribus Iacob. seruat ubique suae uocabula dignitatis: magnus deus et magnus puer, nec in carne magnitudinis suae nomen amittit cuius magnitudinis nullus est finis. meritoque securus, cum in forma dei esset, ut apostolus dicit, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo, sed semet ipsum exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, in similitudinem hominum factus; et specie inuentus ut homo humiliauit semet ipsum factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis.

"It is a great thing for you," he says, "to be called my servant, to raise up the tribes of Jacob." Everywhere he keeps the titles of his dignity: great God and great servant; nor does he lose the name of his greatness in the flesh, of whose greatness there is no end. And rightly secure, "being in the form of God," as the apostle says, "he did not think it robbery to be equal with God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men; and found in appearance as a man he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross."

35.5.2CSEL 64:53–54

hic est ergo aequalis quasi dei filius, hic serui formam in carne suscepit, hic mortem gustauit, cuius magnitudo non habet finem, quia finis legis est Christus ad iustitiam omni credenti, ut in ipsum omnes credamus, hunc intimo adoremus affectu. bona seruitus quae omnes liberos fecit, bona seruitus quae nomen super omne nomen adquisiuit, bona humilitas quae fecit, ut in nomine eius omnes genu sinuent caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum et omnis lingua confiteatur, quoniam dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris. in hunc ergo finem dirigitur hic psalmus, ut et nos serui simus ad iustitiam, non superbi ad arrogantiam; seruitus enim stipendium libertatis est, stipendium autem mortis arrogantia est. sed iam psalmi seriem adoriamur.

This one, then, is equal as the Son of God; this one took the form of a servant in the flesh; this one tasted death, whose greatness has no end, because "Christ is the end of the law for justice to everyone who believes," so that we may all believe in him and adore him with inmost love. Good servitude, which has made all free; good servitude, which has gained the name above every name; good humility, which brought it about that at his name every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father. To this end, then, this psalm is directed, that we too may be servants for justice, not proud unto arrogance; for servitude is the wage of freedom, but arrogance is the wage of death. But let us now take up the course of the psalm.

Explanation 35, chapter 6

35.6.1CSEL 64:54

Dixit iniustus, ut delinquat sibi. quid dixerit non expressit, et ideo sic intellegendum arbitror, quia, quicquid dicit iniustus, peccatum est. omnis enim iniustitia peccatum, quoniam, ubi organum uitiosum, quomodo potest cantus non esse uitiosus? degeneris materiae decolor partus est. quicquid ergo loquitur iniustus, iniquitas est, quae in suum refertur auctorem

"The unjust man said that he would sin against himself." What he said is not expressed, and so I think it must be understood thus: that whatever the unjust man says is sin. For all injustice is sin; since, where the instrument is faulty, how can the song not be faulty? The offspring of degenerate matter is discolored. Whatever the unjust man speaks, then, is iniquity, which falls back on its own author,

35.6.2CSEL 64:54

sicut uiperae partus, qui primo suam scindit parentem, ut frequens sermo est; sibi ergo delinquit. nihil hac sententia sublimius dictum arbitror; in illis, qui sibi sapientiam saeculi uindicarunt, nihil tale legi, nihil tale cognoui. nec mirum, quandoquidem illi humano ingenio locuti sunt, hoc infudit spiritus dei, spiritus ueritatis, quia iniustus sibi delinquat, sibi generet uulnera, se ipse confodiat. nam sicut spinae nascuntur in manu ebriosi, ut scriptura

like the offspring of the viper, which first tears open its own mother, as the common saying is; so he sins against himself. I think nothing more sublime has been said than this sentence; among those who have claimed for themselves the wisdom of the world I have read nothing like it, known nothing like it. No wonder, since they spoke by human ingenuity, while this the Spirit of God poured in, the Spirit of truth: that the unjust man sins against himself, begets wounds for himself, stabs himself. For just as thorns grow in the hand of a drunkard, as Scripture

35.6.3CSEL 64:54

asserit, ita et in iniusti sermone nascuntur quae conpungant loquentem. loquitur iniustus et interior eius conscientia uulneratur, quia in omni sermone quem loquitur non est fraudis immunis. cuius enim grauior est poena quam propria, cum pro omni sermone det poenas? serpens aliis infundit uenenum, iniustus sibi; in eum enim refunditur quicquid effuderit. iniustus igitur et aliis inutilis et sibi noxius, iusti autem uita fructuosa aliis et sibi dulcis; dicit enim Salomon: fili, si sapiens eris tibi, sapiens eris et proximis; si autem malus euaseris, solus hauries mala.

asserts, so too in the unjust man's speech grow things that prick the speaker. The unjust man speaks and his inner conscience is wounded, because in every word he speaks he is not free of fraud. For whose punishment is heavier than one's own, when he pays the penalty for every word? A serpent pours its venom into others, the unjust man into himself; for whatever he pours out flows back on him. The unjust man, then, is both useless to others and harmful to himself; but the just man's life is fruitful to others and sweet to himself; for Solomon says: "Son, if you are wise for yourself, you will be wise for your neighbors too; but if you turn out evil, you alone will drain the evils."

Explanation 35, chapter 7

35.7.1CSEL 64:54–55

Aduertimus ergo, quia iustitia aliis est potius nata quam sibi; commune commodum, non suum spectat et alienum bonum pro suo ducit emolumento. beata et praeclara iustitia, cuius bonum omnibus proficit; ex uno plerumque proficiscitur atque ad omnes peruenit. iustus Dauid, qui parcebat inimico et malebat innocentiam suam quam uitam tueri, ne malo publico uindicaretur atque appetendi principis in malis quoque causis aliis exemplum ederet, cum ipse uindictam de insidiatore sumpsisset.

We note, then, that justice is born rather for others than for itself; it looks to the common advantage, not its own, and counts another's good as its own gain. Blessed and glorious justice, whose good profits all; it often sets out from one and reaches all. Just was David, who spared his enemy and preferred to guard his innocence rather than his life, lest he be avenged to the public harm, and, by seeking the king's life, give others an example even in bad causes, had he himself taken vengeance on the one who lay in wait for him.

35.7.2CSEL 64:55

iustus Abel, qui de ouibus suis, quas ei dominus dederat, primitias domino putauerit offerendas, et ideo plus placuit deo, quia moram non fecit, deuotionem probauit. sed hoc impius ferre non potuit iustitiae praeuaricator, radix iniquitatis, et ideo fratrem occidit, quia hostia eius deo magis quam oblatio sua fuerat comprobata. sed ille occisus deo loquebatur in uoce sanguinis sui, hic uiuus a facie domini repellebatur et, cum adhuc a domino poena cessaret, torquebat eum suorum conscientia peccatorum.

Just was Abel, who thought that the firstfruits of his sheep, which the Lord had given him, should be offered to the Lord, and so pleased God more, because he made no delay and proved his devotion. But this the ungodly man could not bear, the violator of justice, the root of iniquity, and so he killed his brother, because his brother's victim had been approved by God more than his own offering. But Abel, slain, spoke to God in the voice of his blood; Cain, alive, was driven from the face of the Lord, and, while punishment from the Lord was still held back, the conscience of his sins tormented him.

35.7.3CSEL 64:55

latebat miser tremens et timens et, cum adhuc percussor deesset, ipsa sese iniusti uita cruciabat. acceperat signum, ne eum aliquis occideret, non ut uitae suauitate frueretur, sed ne mors auferret aerumnam percussorem suum cotidie timendo pateretur. meruerat quidem ut percussor inhiberetur, sed sine ulla intermissione ipse sibi suus carnifex erat, ipse percussor.

The wretch lay hidden, trembling and fearing, and, while there was still no one to strike him, the unjust man's very life tormented itself. He had received a sign, so that no one should kill him, not that he might enjoy the sweetness of life, but so that death should not take away his misery, and that he might suffer by fearing his slayer daily. He had indeed deserved that the slayer be held back; but without any respite he was his own executioner, his own slayer.

Explanation 35, chapter 8

35.8.1CSEL 64:55

Quae poena maior quam timere quod uitare non possis nec quod timueris euadere? unde praeclare Dauid exprimens conuentionem grauissimam conscientiae peccatricis ait: quoniam iniquitatem meam ego agnosco et delictum meum contra me est semper. offunditur enim nobis ultrix nostri imago peccati nec quietum reum suum esse permittit inferens miseram seruitutem atque in sua uincula trahit, ut enodare se non queat, quoniam uolens ipse se uendidit, cui liberum erat delictorum aera non capere et libertatem innocentiae reseruare.

What punishment is greater than to fear what you cannot avoid, and not to escape what you have feared? Hence David, describing excellently the very heavy confrontation of a sinning conscience, says: "For I acknowledge my iniquity, and my offense is always against me." For the avenging image of our sin is spread before us and does not allow its defendant to be at peace, bringing on wretched slavery and dragging him into its chains, so that he cannot untie himself, since he sold himself willingly, who was free not to take on the debt of offenses and to keep the freedom of innocence.

35.8.2CSEL 64:55–56

itaque dum oramus, peccatum offunditur, ubi somnus sensum corporis relaxauerit, peccatum recurrit. semper nobis error noster tamquam malus exactor occurrit uel tamquam inprobus faenerator conueniens debitorem.

So while we pray, sin spreads itself before us; when sleep has relaxed the body's senses, sin comes back. Our error always meets us like a harsh tax-collector or like a wicked moneylender accosting his debtor.

35.8.3CSEL 64:56

unde dominus ait: qui facit peccatum seruus est peccati. sed iustus nouit, quemadmodum peccatorum suorum uincula dissoluat, nec expectat accusatorem, sed praeuenit, ut confitendo suum alleuet omne delictum, ne habeat quod aduersarius criminetur. ideoque scriptura tibi dicit: iustus in principio sermonis accusator est sui; uocem enim eripit aduersario et quasi dentes quosdam para-

Hence the Lord says: "He who commits sin is the slave of sin." But the just man knows how to loosen the chains of his sins, and does not wait for an accuser but forestalls him, so as to lighten every offense by confessing it, lest the adversary have anything to charge. And so Scripture says to you: "The just man is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech"; for he snatches the voice from the adversary and, as it were, breaks the teeth

35.8.4CSEL 64:56

tos ad praedam criminationis infestae peccatorum suorum confessione constringit. dixit Iudas Scarioth, ut delinqueret sibi — quid dixit? —: quem osculatus fuero ipse est; tenete eum. hoc dixit et se ipse proprio ore egit in mortem. quantos putamus in ipso fuisse tortores, ut sibi ipse tam grauis poenae exactor incumberet et semet ipse laqueo strangularet!

of hostile accusation, bent on prey, by the confession of his sins. Judas Iscariot said, so as to sin against himself (what did he say?): "Whomever I kiss, he is the one; seize him." This he said, and drove himself to death with his own mouth. How many torturers do we think were in him, that he should press upon himself as the exactor of so heavy a penalty and strangle himself with a noose!

Explanation 35, chapter 9

35.9.1CSEL 64:56

Dixit iniustus et deliquit sibi; locutus est iustus: ecce ego pastor male feci, et grex iste quid fecit? et remissum est omne peccatum. dixit ergo iustus et sibi profuit. dixit Cain: numquid ego custos sum fratris mei? et sibi ipse mentitus est. dixit Ananias omne se uenditi sui ruris pretium pertulisse et mentitus est sibi, qui potuit minus offerre sine fraude. ideoque praeclare ait: et mentita est iniquitas sibi. sibi enim ante mentitur, cum suum mentitur exitium, sibi delinquit, qui sibi innocentiae eripit suauitatem.

The unjust man spoke and sinned against himself; the just man spoke: "Behold, I the shepherd have done wrong, and this flock, what has it done?" And all the sin was forgiven. So the just man spoke and profited himself. Cain said: "Am I my brother's keeper?" and lied to himself. Ananias said he had brought the whole price of the field he sold, and lied to himself, who could have offered less without fraud. So it is excellently said: "And iniquity lied to itself." For it lies first to itself when it lies about its own ruin; it sins against itself which snatches from itself the sweetness of innocence.

35.9.2CSEL 64:56–57

qui enim puritate et simplicitate pectoris dulcior fructus, qui cibus suauior quam is, quem animus bene sibi conscii et mens innocentis epulatur? at uero iniquitas uelut quodam plumbeo talento, ut scriptura testificatur, conscientiam grauat, meritoque Dauid ait: sicut onus graue grauatae sunt super me, et Salomon: sicut uua acerba dentibus et fumus oculis, ita iniquitas omnibus utentibus ea.

For what fruit is sweeter than purity and simplicity of heart, what food more delightful than that on which a soul with a good conscience and the mind of an innocent man feasts? But iniquity, as with a talent of lead, as Scripture testifies, weighs down the conscience; and rightly David says: "Like a heavy burden they have weighed upon me," and Solomon: "As a sour grape to the teeth and smoke to the eyes, so is iniquity to all who use it."

35.9.3CSEL 64:57

grauis poena quae cibum impedit, aspectum obducit et, quod est amplius, oculis mentis internae tenebrosam offundit caliginem, ut, quod uerum est, uidere non possit iniustus. ideoque delinquit sibi qui sibi quae pretiosa sunt eripit.

A heavy punishment, which hinders food, clouds the sight and, what is more, pours dark mist over the eyes of the inner mind, so that the unjust man cannot see what is true. So he sins against himself who snatches from himself what is precious.

Explanation 35, chapter 10

35.10.1CSEL 64:57

Dicit ergo iniustus, ut delinquat sibi, iustus autem loquitur, ut et aliis et sibi prosit; ille loquitur ad perniciem, hic loquitur ad salutem. de iustis uero et fidelibus dictum est: corde creditur ad iustitiam, ore autem confessio fit ad salutem. illius lingua uulnerat, lingua autem prudentum sanat.

So the unjust man speaks so as to sin against himself, but the just man speaks so as to profit both others and himself; the one speaks to ruin, the other to salvation. Of the just and faithful it is said: "With the heart one believes unto justice, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." The tongue of the one wounds, but the tongue of the prudent heals.

35.10.2CSEL 64:57

unde cum expostularet Dauid cum rege Saul, quod oblitus beneficii salutis ingratus eum persequeretur ad mortem a quo totiens iam uideret se esse seruatum, et uitam eius appeteret qui uitam suam pro regis salute periculis obtulisset, ait sibi fructum non perire iustitiae, qui insidiatorem suum in manus suas a domino sibi traditum non peremisset. ab iniustis iniquitas prodiuit, uenenum a serpentibus effusum est; uenenum et iniquitatis arma perierunt.

Hence when David remonstrated with King Saul that, forgetful of the kindness of his own safety, he ungratefully pursued to death the man by whom he saw he had so often been saved, and sought the life of one who had offered his own life to dangers for the king's safety, he said that the fruit of justice was not lost to him, who had not killed the man lying in wait for him when the Lord delivered him into his hands. From the unjust iniquity came forth, venom was poured out by serpents; the venom and the weapons of iniquity perished.

Explanation 35, chapter 11

35.11.1CSEL 64:57–58

Ideo scriptum est: dixit iniustus, ut delinquat sibi. quid dixit? ponam thronum meum super nubes et ero similis altissimo. effectum non habent uerba, sed peccatum habent; inanis quidem pompa iactantiae, sed superbiae spiritu criminosus non timet conuicio maiestatem uiolare diuinam. etenim si ullus dei timor eius inesset affectui, non in conspectu dei plena doli gerenda sibi ausu temerario credidisset, quasi deus non possit occulta cognoscere qui scrutator est intimorum.

So it is written: "The unjust man said that he would sin against himself." What did he say? "I will set my throne above the clouds and I will be like the Most High." The words have no effect, but they have sin; it is indeed an empty display of boasting, but the criminal, in a spirit of pride, does not fear to violate the divine majesty with insult. For if any fear of God were in his heart, he would not with rash daring have thought he could do deeds full of deceit in God's sight, as though God, who is the searcher of inmost things, could not know hidden things.

35.11.2CSEL 64:58

spectat omnia deus; nihil est quod eum praetereat, nemo qui fallat, cui omnia praesentia quae futura sunt et manifesta quae latent. etenim si sol iste mundanus clausis plerumque domiciliorum habitaculis suum lumen interserit, quanto magis deus summus aeternus etiam secreta penetralia mentis humanae atque omne angelorum consilium scientia sua scrutatur et praeuenit! quid ergo aliud agit iniustus nisi ut iniquitatem sibi quaerat et odium?

God sees all things; there is nothing that escapes him, no one who deceives him, to whom all things to come are present and things hidden manifest. For if this worldly sun often slips its light into closed rooms of houses, how much more does God, supreme and eternal, search and anticipate with his knowledge even the secret recesses of the human mind and every counsel of the angels! What else, then, does the unjust man do but seek iniquity and hatred for himself?

Explanation 35, chapter 12

35.12.1CSEL 64:58

Sic enim scriptum est: non est timor dei ante oculos eius, quoniam dolose egit in conspectu eius, ut inueniret iniquitatem suam et odium. quid est inueniret? omnis enim qui quaerit inuenit; ergo si malum quaeritur, quaeritur ut inueniatur. sed quemadmodum laudabilis est ille qui bonum quod quaesiuit inuenit, ita inueniabilis qui laborauit, ut malum quod quaesierat inueniret; bonis rebus, non flagitiis atque criminibus laborem nostrum nos oportet inpendere. quid igitur nisi summae stultitiae atque dementiae est odium quaerere, iniquitatem malis artibus inuenire, quam bonus nemo quaesiuit?

For thus it is written: "There is no fear of God before his eyes, for he acted deceitfully in his sight, so as to find his iniquity and hatred." What is "to find"? For everyone who seeks finds; so if evil is sought, it is sought in order to be found. But just as he is praiseworthy who has found the good he sought, so he is blameworthy who has toiled to find the evil he sought; we ought to spend our labor on good things, not on shameful deeds and crimes. What, then, is it but the height of folly and madness to seek hatred and to find by evil arts iniquity, which no good man has sought?

Explanation 35, chapter 13

35.13.1CSEL 64:58

Quomodo igitur improbi iniquitatem suam et odium quaerant, consideremus. nempe Herodias erat tetrarchae Philippi legitimo conexa coniugio, regiae abundans opibus potestatis. quae Herodem Romam adusque tendentem quasi germanum mariti hospi-

Let us consider, then, how the wicked seek their iniquity and hatred. Herodias, indeed, was joined in lawful marriage to the tetrarch Philip, abounding in the wealth of royal power. She received Herod, on his way to Rome, as her husband's brother, by the right of hospitality

35.13.2CSEL 64:58–59

tii et affinitatis iure suscepit, cum quo peccata sua copulans non multo post relicto uiro consortii sui iura mutauit. nonne ea quaesiuit iniquitatem et odium, quae coniugium deseruit, ut inueniret adulterium? et quia sanctus Baptista nuptias inlicitas constanter increpuit, dicens Herodi: non licet tibi eam uxorem habere, quae maritum contra legem reliquit et fratri mariti quasi ex lege conuenit, commota est adultera, ut eum uellet occidere. sed cognito, quod Herodem ad necem iusti non facile posset inflectere, excogitauit, qua uia istud efficeret.

and kinship; joining her sins with his, not long after she left her husband and changed the rights of her partnership. Did she not seek iniquity and hatred, who deserted her marriage so as to find adultery? And because the holy Baptist steadfastly rebuked the unlawful wedding, saying to Herod: "It is not lawful for you to have her as wife," who had left her husband against the law and came together with her husband's brother as though by law, the adulteress was enraged so that she wanted to kill him. But knowing that she could not easily bend Herod to the killing of the just man, she devised a way to bring it about.

35.13.3CSEL 64:59

natalis erat Herodis, quem luxu nimio, ut plerisque regibus mos est, celebrare consueuerat. adornauit filiam, ut in conuiuio regis pignus regale saltaret. et cum placuisset Herodi, quod displiceret patruo, obtulit ei, ut quod uellet praemium pro saltationis obprobrio postularet. matrem illa consuluit, cuius inpulsu caput Baptistae poposcit.

It was Herod's birthday, which he was accustomed to celebrate with excessive luxury, as is the custom of most kings. She adorned her daughter to dance at the king's banquet, a royal child. And when she had pleased Herod, though it should have displeased him as her uncle, he offered her to ask whatever reward she wished for the disgrace of her dancing. She consulted her mother, at whose urging she asked for the head of the Baptist.

35.13.4CSEL 64:59

uictus Herodes, quia sacramento se constrinxerat daturum quicquid neptis propria petisset, iussit occidi Iohannem et caput eius afferri. quod allatum puellae dedit et illa matri suae pertulit. uerum est ergo, quod iniquitas et odium requirantur, quandoquidem ea mulier, quod facili petitione impetrare non poterat, prauis artibus excogitatae fraudis elicuit.

Herod, overcome because he had bound himself by an oath to give whatever his own niece asked, ordered John to be killed and his head brought. When it was brought he gave it to the girl, and she carried it to her mother. It is true, then, that iniquity and hatred are sought, since that woman drew out by the wicked arts of a fraud she devised what she could not obtain by a simple request.

Explanation 35, chapter 14

35.14.1CSEL 64:59

Quid de Iuda proditore loquar, qui quaesiuit auaritiam et inuenit sacrilegium dicens: quid mihi dabitis, et ego eum uobis tradam?, nec expletus pauperum spoliis ad plenitudinem criminum grauissimorum crimina serendo peruenit pia miscens caritatis sacramenta flagitiis, cum diceret: quem osculatus fuero ipse est; tenete eum, uere ut de eo dictum dubitari non queat: uerba oris eius iniquitas et dolus. oscula labiis ferebat, offundebat uenena pectoribus; meditabatur acerba supplicia, gratiae pignus afferebat.

What shall I say of Judas the betrayer, who sought avarice and found sacrilege, saying: "What will you give me, and I will hand him over to you?" and, not satisfied with the spoils of the poor, reached the fullness of the gravest crimes by sowing crimes, mixing the holy pledges of love with shameful deeds when he said: "Whomever I kiss, he is the one; seize him," so that it cannot be doubted that it was truly said of him: "The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit." He brought kisses with his lips, poured poison into hearts; he was planning bitter tortures and brought the pledge of grace.

Explanation 35, chapter 15

35.15.1CSEL 64:59–60

Bene de eo propheta addi fecit: noluit intellegere, ut bene ageret; non enim per naturam deliquit, sed per uoluntatem. denique apostolus erat, audiebat cotidie diuina mandata, discebat caeleste mysterium, potuit intellegere ut bene ageret, si noluisset. uidebat sanari paralyticos, caecis refundi lumen, mortuos resuscitari;

Well did the prophet add of him: "He would not understand, so as to do good"; for he sinned not by nature but by will. Indeed he was an apostle, heard daily the divine commands, learned the heavenly mystery; he could have understood so as to do good, had he not refused. He saw paralytics healed, light restored to the blind, the dead raised;

35.15.2CSEL 64:60

non debuit intellegere, quod deus esset qui talia posset operari? sed intellegere noluit, quia auarus homo et pecuniae intentus a cognitione diuinitatis uigorem suae mentis auertit. unusquisque enim, qui se flagitiis ingurgitauerit, non uult intellegere quae caelestium mandatorum sunt, ne reuocetur a uitiis. uide illum fugientem intellegere, qui ait: tenebrae operiunt me et circumdant parietes; quis scit an uideat dominus?

ought he not to have understood that he was God who could do such things? But he would not understand, because, a greedy man intent on money, he turned the vigor of his mind away from the knowledge of the Godhead. For everyone who has gorged himself with shameful deeds does not want to understand what belongs to the heavenly commands, lest he be called back from his vices. See him who flees understanding, who says: "Darkness covers me and walls surround me; who knows whether the Lord sees?"

35.15.3CSEL 64:60

non uult enim quaerere et inuenire quod deus omnia uideat atque cognoscat, ne metu retrahatur a crimine. uide regem Achab petentem a Nabutha uineam eius, cognosce respondentem illum: absit. ut cedam hereditatem patrum meorum. non debuit intellegere, quod iusta referebat? sed noluit intellegere, ut bene ageret et aliena non quaereret. non debuit intellegere, quod uero Helias deo seruiebat, cum uideret in uerbo Heliae clausum caelum tribus annis et tribus mensibus et ad preces eius pluuias esse demissas, ut arida omnia rigarentur? sed noluit intellegere, ne perfidiam condemnaret, sequeretur fidem.

For he does not want to seek and find that God sees and knows all things, lest he be held back from crime by fear. See King Ahab asking Naboth for his vineyard; recognize him answering: "Far be it from me to give up the inheritance of my fathers." Ought he not to have understood that he answered justly? But he would not understand, so as to do good and not seek what belonged to others. Ought he not to have understood that Elijah truly served God, when he saw heaven shut at Elijah's word for three years and three months, and rain sent down at his prayers so that everything dry was watered? But he would not understand, lest he condemn faithlessness and follow faith.

Explanation 35, chapter 16

35.16.1CSEL 64:60

Quin etiam iniquitatem meditatus est in cubili suo, ubi uerum quaerere debuisset... in cubilibus enim compungere nos debent nostra peccata, non ipsis delinquendo committi, dicente propheta: quae dicitis in cordibus uestris, et in cubilibus uestris conpungimini.

Moreover, "he meditated iniquity on his bed," where he ought to have sought the truth. For on our beds our sins ought to prick us, not be committed by our sinning in them, as the prophet says: "What you say in your hearts, be pricked with compunction on your beds as well."

Explanation 35, chapter 17

35.17.1CSEL 64:60–61

Adstitit, inquit, omni uiae non bonae, malitiam autem odio non habuit. non enim inmerito iniusta meditatur, qui in uia erroris adsistit et malitiam diligit, quam odisse deberet. plus dixit adstitit, quasi iam dudum in uia nequitiae diuturna statione permaneat; ille enim beatus qui in uia peccatorum non stetit, non is qui in ea stare non desinat.

"He set himself," it says, "on every way that is not good, but did not hate malice." Not without reason does he meditate unjust things who stands by on the way of error and loves malice, which he ought to hate. He said something more with "set himself," as though he had long remained on the way of wickedness in a lasting stand; for that man is blessed who has not stood in the way of sinners, not he who does not cease to stand in it.

35.17.2CSEL 64:61

et ideo prima praecepta sunt sancti prophetae Dauid impietatem fugere, in peccato non stare, in lege meditari, ut intellegas quae bona sunt et iusta atque iniusta secernas. in omnibus igitur radix est spectanda gignendi, ne eam inutilis ab exordio sucus inficiat, grauioraque multo sunt animorum uitia quam uirgultorum.

And so the first precepts of the holy prophet David are to flee ungodliness, not to stand in sin, to meditate on the law, so that you may understand what is good and just and distinguish the unjust. In all things, then, the root of what is begotten must be watched, lest a useless sap infect it from the beginning; and the vices of souls are much graver than those of shrubs.

35.17.3CSEL 64:61

cauendum ergo prae ceteris, ne humano ingenio malitiae usus inolescat atque omnis aetas secutura degeneret; arbor enim mala malos fructus facit. nam si plerumque, quod nolumus, hoc agimus et uitare non possumus et, quod odio habemus, hoc facimus uincti quadam aut delectatione flagitii aut obreptione peccati, quomodo possumus uitare quod amamus? adstringimur et inuiti; quomodo possumus uoluntarii non teneri?

Above all, then, we must take care that the practice of malice does not grow into human nature and every age to come degenerate; for "a bad tree makes bad fruit." For if we often do what we do not want and cannot avoid it, and do what we hate, bound either by a kind of delight in shameful deeds or by the stealth of sin, how can we avoid what we love? We are bound even unwillingly; how can we not be held when we are willing?

35.17.4CSEL 64:61

uix se exsoluit Paulus erroribus cotidiana decertatione luctando, ut uinculis captiuitatis exutus per Christi gratiam seruaretur; et tu putas, quod assistendo delictis possis ad caelestium repromissionum meritum peruenire? luctando corona quaeritur, non reluctando; studio, non refragio comparatur. certantibus quoque diuinae misericordiae suffragia postulanda sunt, ut corona iustitiae pro laborum meritis deferatur.

Paul scarcely freed himself from errors, wrestling in daily combat, so that, stripped of the chains of captivity, he might be saved by Christ's grace; and do you think that by standing by your offenses you can attain the merit of the heavenly promises? The crown is sought by wrestling, not by resisting; it is gained by zeal, not by refusal. And those who strive must ask for the support of divine mercy, so that the crown of justice may be conferred for the merits of their labors.

Explanation 35, chapter 18

35.18.1CSEL 64:61

Denique quid sequatur, consideremus: domine, inquit; in caelo misericordia tua et ueritas tua usque ad nubes; iustitia tua sicut montes dei, iudicia tua sicut abyssus multa. nonne hunc locum secutus est Paulus, ut diceret: infelix ego homo! quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum?

Next let us consider what follows: "Lord," he says, "your mercy is in heaven and your truth reaches to the clouds; your justice is like the mountains of God, your judgments like a great abyss." Did not Paul follow this passage when he said: "Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord"?

35.18.2CSEL 64:61–62

ubi enim mens humana turbatur et certaminum dura atque aspera nos fatigant, domini auxilium postulandum est. ideoque conuersus ad dominum ipsum inuocat et implorat, ut laborantibus adiutor assistat. misericordia ergo petenda de caelo est, ueritas dei ex prophetarum oraculis colligenda, qui quasi nubes mysteria diuinae cognitionis obtexunt.

For when the human mind is troubled and the hard and rough contests weary us, the Lord's help must be asked. So, turning to the Lord, he calls on him and implores him to stand by those who labor as their helper. Mercy, then, must be sought from heaven; the truth of God must be gathered from the oracles of the prophets, who, like clouds, veil the mysteries of divine knowledge.

35.18.3CSEL 64:62

posuit enim tenebras deus latibulum suum, ut primo pluuiam mysticae fertilitatis accipias et tunc infusus rore caelesti fulgorem reseratae lucis agnoscas, ut possis dicere: ex plenitudine eius accepimus. quis enim potest secreta dei facile conprehendere, cuius iustitia sicut montes dei uel, sicut Aquilas

For God made darkness his hiding place, so that you may first receive the rain of mystic fruitfulness and then, soaked with heavenly dew, recognize the brightness of the light disclosed, so that you can say: "Of his fullness we have received." For who can easily grasp the secrets of God, whose justice is like the mountains of God, or, as Aquila

35.18.4CSEL 64:62

posuit, ut montes ualidi, eo quod ualidae uirtutis plena praecepta sint? unde et apostolus uidens esse sublimia audet et dicit: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! quis enim cognouit sensum domini? aut quis consiliarius eius fuit?

put it, "like strong mountains," because the precepts are full of strong power? Hence the apostle too, seeing that they are sublime, dares to say: "O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and his ways past finding out! For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counsellor?"

35.18.5CSEL 64:62

altitudinem itaque diuitiarum sapientiae retulit ad altitudinem montium; audi quorum montium. ipse enim dei filius mons magnus est, et ideo ascende in hunc montem qui euangelizas Sion, ut stes radicatus et plantatus in Christo. est mons quasi sapientia dei, est et mons quasi iusti-

He referred the depth of the riches of wisdom, then, to the height of mountains; hear what mountains. For the Son of God himself is a great mountain; and so: "Go up on this mountain, you who bring good news to Zion," so that you may stand rooted and planted in Christ. There is a mountain that is the wisdom of God, there is a mountain that is the justice

35.18.6CSEL 64:62–63

tia dei, est et mons quasi scientia dei, est mons quasi sanctificatio, est mons quasi redemptio, est mons quasi resurrectio. demonstrauit nobis hos montes scriptura, quae dixit: in ipso autem uos estis in Christo Iesu, qui factus est sapientia nobis a deo et iustitia et sanctificatio et redemptio, uel quia angelis angelus factus est dei filius, prophetis propheta, cuius iudicia sicut abyssus multa. audi bona: abyssus abyssum inuocat in uoce cataractarum tuarum, id est: scriptura ueteris testamenti noui aduocat seriem testamenti ad consummationem sanctificationis et plenitudinem gratiae sonitu quodam atque profluuio redundantiae spiritalis.

of God, there is a mountain that is the knowledge of God, there is a mountain that is sanctification, there is a mountain that is redemption, there is a mountain that is resurrection. Scripture showed us these mountains when it said: "But in him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God, and justice and sanctification and redemption"; or because the Son of God became an angel to angels, a prophet to prophets, "whose judgments are like a great abyss." Hear the good things: "Deep calls to deep at the voice of your cataracts"; that is, the Scripture of the Old Testament calls on the course of the New Testament to the completion of sanctification and the fullness of grace, with a kind of sound and outpouring of spiritual abundance.

Explanation 35, chapter 19

35.19.1CSEL 64:63

Homines, inquit, et iumenta saluos facies, domine, sicut multiplicasti misericordiam tuam, deus; filii autem hominum in protectione alarum tuarum sperant, inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae et torrentem uoluptatis tuae potabis eos. quid est homines et iumenta? rationabiles utique et inrationabiles. rationabilibus indicia, inrationabilibus misericordia; alii reguntur, alii nutriuntur.

"Men and beasts," he says, "you will save, O Lord, as you have multiplied your mercy, O God; but the sons of men will hope in the protection of your wings; they will be drunk with the richness of your house, and you will give them to drink the torrent of your pleasure." What are "men and beasts"? Rational and irrational beings, surely. To the rational, judgments; to the irrational, mercy; the one are ruled, the other fed.

35.19.2CSEL 64:63

ideoque addidit: filii autem hominum in protectione alarum tuarum sperant, id est: non generatio uiperarum, sed filii hominum, qui ad imaginem et similitudinem dei uiuunt, non in pascuis, sed in conuiuiis collocantur; alii enim in loco pascuorum, alii in priuilegio sacramentorum; inperfectis sucus lactis, perfectis mensa refectionis, de qua dixit: parasti in conspectu meo mensam, in qua panis uiuus, id est uerbum dei, in qua oleum sanctificationis, quo inpinguatur caput iusti et sensus firmatur interior, ut aboleatur oleum peccatoris, in qua etiam poculum illud inebrians quam praeclarum uel quam ualidum; κράτιστον enim dixit Graecus uel potens uel forte uel ualidum; ualidum enim, quo abluuntur flagitia uel delentur.

And so he added: "But the sons of men will hope in the protection of your wings," that is, not a brood of vipers but sons of men, who live after the image and likeness of God, are placed not in pastures but at banquets; for some are in a place of pasture, others in the privilege of the sacraments: to the imperfect the juice of milk, to the perfect the table of refreshment, of which he said: "You have prepared a table in my sight," on which is the living bread, that is, the Word of God; on which is the oil of sanctification, with which the head of the just is anointed and the inner sense strengthened, so that the oil of the sinner may be abolished; on which also is that cup that makes drunk, how excellent, or how strong; for the Greek said "mightiest," whether powerful or strong or mighty; mighty, by which shameful deeds are washed away or blotted out.

35.19.3CSEL 64:63–64

bona ergo ebrietas poculi salutaris. sed est alia ebrietas de redundantia scripturarum, est et alia ebrietas per infusionem spiritus sancti; denique illi, qui diuersis linguis in apostolorum Actibus loquebantur, musto pleni audientibus uidebantur. domus ergo ecclesia est, ubertas domus redundantia gratiarum, torrens uoluptatis spiritus sanctus.

Good, then, is the drunkenness of the cup of salvation. But there is another drunkenness from the abundance of the Scriptures, and another through the infusion of the Holy Spirit; indeed those who spoke in different tongues in the Acts of the Apostles seemed to their hearers full of new wine. The house, then, is the church; the richness of the house the abundance of graces; the torrent of pleasure the Holy Spirit.

Explanation 35, chapter 20

35.20.1CSEL 64:64

Nec te nomen aut mos torrentis offendat, quod aliquando aridior aut exilior sit, ut eius soleant fluenta cessare. cessauit et hic noster, cessauit aliquando torrens profluuii spiritalis in populo Iudaeorum. quid dicam torrens cessauit, cum mare cessauerit, sicut lectio hodierna nos docuit dicente domino: ecce ego increpatione mea desolabo mare (et ponam flumi-

Do not let the name or the habit of a torrent offend you, that it is sometimes drier or thinner, so that its streams are wont to cease. Ours too has ceased; the torrent of spiritual outflow once ceased among the Jewish people. Why do I say the torrent ceased, when the sea ceased, as today's reading taught us, when the Lord says: "Behold, by my rebuke I will make the sea desolate (and make the rivers

35.20.2CSEL 64:64

na deserta) et arefient pisces eorum, utique Iudaeorum suae ariditate perfidiae, ut enatare non possint? cessauit ergo torrens propter synagogae sacrilegia, quia erat illa plebs fide arida, sterilis operibus, captiua peccatis. quid enim flueret non bibentibus, sed contaminantibus sacros meatus, cum ipsum fontem negarent? bonus torrens, qui illis cessauit, ut nobis abundaret et sitim humanae captiuitatis auerteret sicut torrens in austro. unde et scriptura dicit: surge, aquilo, et ueni, auster, qui arbusculas paradisi perflare consueuit.

a desert), and their fish will dry up," surely the fish of the Jews, by the dryness of their faithlessness, so that they cannot swim out? The torrent ceased, then, because of the sacrileges of the synagogue, for that people was dry in faith, barren in works, captive to sins. For what should flow for those who did not drink but defiled the sacred channels, when they denied the very fountain? Good the torrent that ceased for them so as to abound for us and turn away the thirst of human captivity, like a torrent in the south. Hence Scripture says too: "Rise, north wind, and come, south wind," which is wont to blow through the shrubs of paradise.

Explanation 35, chapter 21

35.21.1CSEL 64:64–65

Diximus sensum, etiam elocutionem consideremus. quare torrentem uoluptatis dixit potabis eos et non torrente quasi de torrente, nisi quia auiditatem bibentium uoluit exprimere, quasi torrentem ipsum uellent ebibere, si possent? hic est forsitan torrens uoluptatis, quem in Genesi legimus fontem qui adluit paradisum et diuiditur in quattuor flumina, quae circumeunt totam terram. ex hoc etiam fonte uirtutes profluunt spiritales, prudentia temperantia fortitudo iustitia. bonus fons gratiae et splendoris eiusdem atque naturae cuius et illud flumen, de quo in posterioribus dicitur: fluminis impetus laetificat ciuitatem dei.

We have stated the sense; let us consider the wording too. Why did he say "you will give them to drink the torrent of your pleasure" and not "from the torrent," if not because he wished to express the eagerness of the drinkers, as though they wished to drink up the torrent itself if they could? This perhaps is the torrent of pleasure which we read of in Genesis, the fountain which waters paradise and is divided into four rivers which go around the whole earth. From this fountain flow the spiritual virtues too: prudence, temperance, fortitude, justice. Good the fountain of grace and of splendor, of the same nature as that river of which it is said in later psalms: "The rush of the river makes glad the city of God."

Explanation 35, chapter 22

35.22.1CSEL 64:65

Aptissime itaque substituit: quoniam apud te est fons uitae et in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen. praetende misericordiam tuam scientibus te et iustitiam tuam his qui recto sunt corde. etenim post commemorationem caelestium beneficiorum iure gratiae referuntur auctori domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui fons uitae inriguus aeternae descendit in terras, ut ariditates nostri pectoris inrigaret.

Most fittingly, then, he adds: "For with you is the fountain of life, and in your light we shall see light. Extend your mercy to those who know you, and your justice to those who are upright in heart." For after recalling the heavenly benefits, thanks are rightly returned to their author, our Lord Jesus Christ, who, the watering fountain of eternal life, came down to earth to water the dryness of our hearts.

35.22.2CSEL 64:65

idem splendor gloriae dei patris et imago substantiae eius, et ideo in lumine eius uero, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, uidebimus, inquit, patrem, quia deus lux est. recte etiam dicitur: in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen secundum illud: qui uidet, uidet et patrem meum. apud te ergo, fons uitae, praesentem uidebimus patrem.

He is the brightness of the glory of God the Father and the image of his substance; and so in his true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world, we shall see, he says, the Father, for God is light. Rightly too it is said: "In your light we shall see light," according to that saying: "He who sees me sees my Father also." With you, then, fountain of life, we shall see the Father present.

35.22.3CSEL 64:65

sicut enim tu apud patrem eras in principio deus uerbum, ita apud te semper est pater qui in te est; est enim apud ipsum in quo et est. prophetatur autem aduentus domini saluatoris, qui uenturus in terram diceret: ego et pater unum sumus, id est: unum sumus lumen sicut unum nomen; per luminis et nominis unitatem ambo unum sumus, immo trinitas unum in unitate substantiae, sed distinctione uniuscuiusque personae.

For as you were with the Father in the beginning, God the Word, so the Father is always with you, who is in you; for he is with him in whom he also is. And the coming of the Lord the Savior is prophesied, who, when he came to earth, would say: "I and the Father are one," that is: we are one light as one name; by the unity of light and name we both are one; indeed the Trinity is one in unity of substance, but with the distinction of each person.

35.22.4CSEL 64:65–66

trinitas distinctionem significat personarum, unitas potestatem. potest et ad patrem dici: quoniam apud te est fons uitae, id est ex quo uita processit, quod erat uerbum et semper erat ideo, quia apud te erat. omnia per ipsum et in ipso facta sunt et ipse est uita uniuersorum et ipse te nobis manifestauit, ut corda hominum ad cognitionem tuae maiestatis inluminet.

"Trinity" signifies the distinction of the persons; "unity" the power. It can also be said to the Father: "For with you is the fountain of life," that is, from which life proceeded, which was the Word, and was always so, because it was with you. All things were made through him and in him, and he is the life of all, and he has made you manifest to us, so as to enlighten the hearts of men to the knowledge of your majesty.

Explanation 35, chapter 23

35.23.1CSEL 64:66

Praetende ergo misericordiam tuam scientibus te. praerogatiua praetenditur, ut mereantur misericordiam quibus cognitionis tuae meritum suffragatur. denique in posterioribus etiam uilioribus personis studium scientiae agnoscimus suffragatum dicente domino: memor ero Raab et Babylonis scientibus me, id est: meretricis illius Raab et confusionis illius memor ero apud scientes me uel inter ipsos, quia meretrix illa me agnouit, quem populus non cognouit [ut] electus.

"Extend, then, your mercy to those who know you." A privilege is held out, that those may deserve mercy whom the merit of knowing you supports. Indeed in later psalms we recognize that zeal for knowledge supported even lower persons, when the Lord says: "I will be mindful of Rahab and Babylon, for those who know me," that is: I will be mindful of that harlot Rahab and of that confusion among those who know me, or among them themselves, because that harlot recognized me, whom the chosen people did not know.

35.23.2CSEL 64:66

inter illos ergo qui me scierunt commemorabitur Raab, ut dignum fidei praemium adipiscatur. unde et in euangelio dictum aduertimus: meretrices et publicani praecedent uos in regno caelorum. sed quia inualidi sumus ad exsequendum, licet deuoti ad credendum, tu praetende misericordiam tuam in te credentibus, quo deuotioni et fidei facta quoque nostra conueniant nec studium mentis nostrae destituat corporis huius infirmitas: sed in ipsis temptationibus et infirmitatibus gloriemur, in quibus gloriabatur apostolus dicens: libentissime itaque magis gloriabor in infirmitatibus meis, ut praetendat in me uirtus Christi.

Among those, then, who knew me Rahab will be remembered, so that she may obtain the reward worthy of faith. Hence we note that it was said in the gospel too: "Harlots and tax collectors will go before you into the kingdom of heaven." But since we are weak in carrying out, though devoted in believing, extend your mercy to those who believe in you, so that our deeds too may match our devotion and faith, and the weakness of this body may not abandon the zeal of our mind; but let us glory in temptations and weaknesses themselves, in which the apostle gloried, saying: "Most gladly, then, will I glory rather in my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may extend over me."

Explanation 35, chapter 24

35.24.1CSEL 64:66–67

Pulcherrime itaque addidit: non ueniat mihi pes superbiae et manus peccatorum non moueat me. ibi ceciderunt operantes iniquitatem, expulsi sunt nec potuerunt stare. superius quidam accipiunt torrentem uoluptatis tuae in temptationibus fortitudinem, sicut est martyrum, in quibus placuit deo exhibere sibi suauis et grati certaminis uoluptatem. etenim si hiemes pro temptationibus accipiuntur — unde orandum dominus ammonet, ne fiat fuga nostra hieme uel sabbato, hoc est: uel in temptatione uel otio; hieme autem crescit torrens et adimpletur atque intumescit —, torrens utique pro grauiore temptatione potest accipi, quae est in persecutionibus. et ideo bene torrens uoluptatis dicitur, quia, ubi superabundauit peccatum persecutionis, superabundauit et gratia confessionis.

Most beautifully, then, he added: "Let not the foot of pride come to me, and let not the hand of sinners move me. There the workers of iniquity fell; they were driven out and could not stand." Some take the "torrent of your pleasure" above as fortitude in temptations, like that of the martyrs, in whom it pleased God to show the pleasure of a sweet and grateful contest. For if winters are taken for temptations (whence the Lord warns us to pray that our flight be not in winter or on a sabbath, that is, either in temptation or in idleness; and in winter a torrent rises, fills and swells), the torrent can surely be taken for the graver temptation that occurs in persecutions. And so it is well called a torrent of pleasure, because where the sin of persecution abounded, the grace of confession abounded the more.

Explanation 35, chapter 25

35.25.1CSEL 64:67

Uide uirtutem propheticae distinctionis. primo iniustum exposuit, qui uel in corde suo uel in sermone dicit, ut sibi delinquat uel in se delinquat; habet enim Graecus codex ἐν αὐτῷ, id est in se ipso, sed non omnes. et forte ideo, quia insipiens in corde suo dixit quia non est deus, ne forte et iniustus intra se dicat et intra se delinquat, licet deum palam negare dementis sit.

See the power of the prophetic arrangement. First he set out the unjust man, who says either in his heart or in speech that he will sin against himself, or in himself; for the Greek manuscript has "in himself," though not all do. And perhaps for this reason: since "the fool said in his heart, there is no God," lest perhaps the unjust man too should say within himself and sin within himself, although it is the mark of a madman to deny God openly.

35.25.2CSEL 64:67

iniustitiam autem plerique pro laude profitentur; rapere enim, nocere etiam his qui non laeserint, circumuenire plerique sibi existimant gloriosum. ergo primo iniusti uitam exposuit, postea sacramenta diuinae cognitionis adiunxit, ut timentes deum iniquitatem et iniustitiam declinemus. precem addidit, ut ab iniustorum consortio iustos suos liberare dignetur, ut in his quoque, qui mundo sunt corde, iustitia diuina praetendat quasi speculatrix pia, ne nobis peccatorum uelut hostium incursus obrepat et capiat dormientes.

But many profess injustice as a matter of praise; for many think it glorious to rob, to harm even those who have done no injury, to cheat. So first he set out the life of the unjust man, then added the mysteries of divine knowledge, so that, fearing God, we may turn away from iniquity and injustice. He added a prayer, that he would deign to free his just ones from the company of the unjust, so that in those too who are clean of heart divine justice may extend itself like a loving watchman, lest the assault of sins, like that of enemies, steal upon us and capture us asleep.

35.25.3CSEL 64:67–68

ideo uigilandum est semper, castra domini munienda, quia nocte aduenit inimicus et aduersarius, quando somno sensus tenetur, cibo corpus distenditur, orandum, ut iustitia dei praetendat in nobis, quae in infirmitate positos faciat fortiores, ut possit unusquisque nostrum dicere: cum infirmor, tunc potens sum.

So we must always keep watch and fortify the Lord's camp, because the enemy and adversary comes by night, when the senses are held by sleep and the body is distended with food; we must pray that God's justice may extend itself in us, to make us stronger when placed in weakness, so that each of us can say: "When I am weak, then I am strong."

Explanation 35, chapter 26

35.26.1CSEL 64:68

Deinde etiam specialiter pro se orat, ut nos doceat, quemadmodum orare debeamus ad dominum: non ueniat, inquit, mihi pes superbiae, id est: non in superbiam incidam. denique et alibi meminit sui dicens: si non ambulaui in magnis. hic orauit, ibi impleuit; non implesset, nisi orasset. cauenda superbia, quae etiam in prosperis subplantat; denique grauius Adam in paradiso cecidit quam si cecidisset in terra.

Then he prays specially for himself too, to teach us how we ought to pray to the Lord: "Let not the foot of pride come to me," he says, that is: let me not fall into pride. Indeed elsewhere he recalls himself, saying: "If I have not walked in great things." Here he prayed, there he fulfilled; he would not have fulfilled had he not prayed. Pride must be guarded against, which trips us even in prosperity; indeed Adam fell more gravely in paradise than if he had fallen on earth.

35.26.2CSEL 64:68

de altissimis cadere praecipitium est, in planis lapsus uocatur. ideo pes errat superbi, quia caput non tenet; oculi enim sapientis in capite eius. non mirum ergo, si errat uestigium, ubi oculus non habetur. praecedat oculus, ut pes sequatur. quomodo ergo in tenebris uiator incedes? cito pes offendit in nocte, si quasi quidam mundi oculus uiam luna non monstret. et tu in nocte es saeculi; monstret tibi ecclesia uiam, ex alto te iustitiae sol inluminet, ut lapsum timere non possis.

To fall from the heights is a headlong plunge; on level ground it is called a slip. So the foot of the proud man strays, because he does not hold to his head; for "the eyes of the wise man are in his head." No wonder, then, if the step strays where there is no eye. Let the eye go before so that the foot may follow. How, then, will you walk as a traveller in darkness? The foot soon stumbles at night if the moon, a kind of eye of the world, does not show the way. You too are in the night of the world; let the church show you the way, let the sun of justice enlighten you from on high, so that you need not fear a fall.

Explanation 35, chapter 27

35.27.1CSEL 64:68

Et quia pedem dixerat superbiae, addidit: et manus peccatorum non moueat me. etenim sicut sancti membra sunt Christi, ita impii membra sunt diaboli. manus peccatorum non moueat me, id est: actus eorum qui peccant non me de iustitiae statione demoueant. plerumque enim, dum uidemus peccatores prosperis abundare successibus, nutamus affectu et quasi quadam peccatorum manu de radice uirtutis auellimur. cauendum ergo, ne, quos in domo dei manus diuina plantauit, manus aduersa subplantet. pulchre tamen hoc dicit qui a persecutoribus uerberatur. qui autem mouentur de radice sua, quae iam Christo inhaeserat, cadunt.

And because he had spoken of the foot of pride, he added: "and let not the hand of sinners move me." For as the saints are members of Christ, so the ungodly are members of the devil. Let not the hand of sinners move me, that is: let not the actions of those who sin move me from my station of justice. For often, when we see sinners abounding in prosperous successes, we waver in feeling and are torn, as by a hand of sinners, from the root of virtue. We must take care, then, that those whom the divine hand has planted in the house of God an adverse hand does not uproot. Yet he says this finely who is beaten by persecutors. But those who are moved from their root, which had already clung to Christ, fall.

Explanation 35, chapter 28

35.28.1CSEL 64:68–69

Unde addidit: ibi ceciderunt qui operantur iniquitatem. quid est ibi? utrum ubi est Superbia, ubi est manus peccatorum, an ubi stabant, ubi erant ante plantati, ibi ceciderunt, an in caeno, an in continenti, quasi in ipso tempore, in ipso loco? et uidetur ambiguum. sed alibi docemur quid sit ibi, ubi dicitur: ibi dolores sicut parturientis. bonus dolor ei, cui partus est fidei, quo Christus in ecclesia formatur et nascitur.

Hence he added: "There the workers of iniquity fell." What is "there"? Is it where pride is, where the hand of sinners is, or where they stood, where they had been planted before, there they fell; or in the mud, or at once, as it were at that very time, in that very place? It seems ambiguous. But elsewhere we are taught what "there" is, where it is said: "There, pains as of a woman in labor." Good is the pain for one who has a birth of faith, by which Christ is formed and born in the church.

35.28.2CSEL 64:69

et alibi dicit memor ero Raab et Babylonis scientibus me; etenim alienigenae et Tyrus et populus Aethiopum, hi fuerunt ibi, id est: ubi scientes me, ubi fundamenta in montibus sanctis, ibi et alienigenae, quia et ipsi in me putauerunt esse credendum. ibi ergo ceciderunt ubi magis stare debuerunt, quia et in paradiso cecidit Adam et Christus in ruinam uenit et in resurrectionem, ut ruina sit perfidorum, iustorum autem et fidelium resurrectio.

And elsewhere he says: "I will be mindful of Rahab and Babylon for those who know me"; for "the foreigners and Tyre and the people of the Ethiopians, these were there," that is: where those who know me are, where the foundations are on the holy mountains, there are the foreigners too, because they also thought they should believe in me. There, then, they fell where they ought rather to have stood; for Adam fell even in paradise, and Christ came "for the fall and for the rising," so that there might be the ruin of the faithless but the rising of the just and faithful.

Explanation 35, chapter 29

35.29.1CSEL 64:69

Denique expulsi sunt, quia iniusti uiri in loco sancto stare non poterant. unde et apostolus dixit: et tu qui stas uide ne cadas, et utique ei dixit qui non corpore, sed fide dabat. possumus et in futurum intellegere ibi, ut est: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium et: nudus ibi pergam. quam breuis autem in exitu et quanta conclusio!

Then "they were driven out," because unjust men could not stand in the holy place. Hence the apostle too said: "And you who stand, see that you do not fall," and he certainly said it to one who stood not in body but in faith. We can also understand "there" of the future, as in: "There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth," and: "Naked I shall go there." How brief, then, in its close, and how great a conclusion!

35.29.2CSEL 64:69–70

non sim, inquit, superbus, ut peccem; non peccem, ne mouear; non mouear, ne cadam; non cadam, ne expellar, sicut Adam de paradiso expulsus est, quia in ipso primum pes superbiae stare non potuit. nescit stare superbia et, si ceciderit, non nouit resurgere. et ideo pulchre iste et in superioribus locutus est de superbis: hi in curribus et hi in equis, nos autem in nomine dei nostri magnificabimur — hoc enim stabile, illud infidum - et subiecit:

Let me not be proud, he says, lest I sin; let me not sin, lest I be moved; let me not be moved, lest I fall; let me not fall, lest I be driven out, as Adam was driven out of paradise, because in him first the foot of pride could not stand. Pride does not know how to stand, and if it falls it does not know how to rise again. And so he finely spoke in earlier psalms too of the proud: "Some in chariots and some in horses, but we will be magnified in the name of our God" (for this is stable, that untrustworthy), and added:

35.29.3CSEL 64:70

ipsi obligati sunt et ceciderunt, nos uero surreximus et erecti sumus. et libro Michaeae scriptum est prophetae: noli superbe gaudere mihi, inimica mea, quia cecidi; sed resurgam. cecidimus enim in hoc mundo, sed in Christo resurreximus, cui est honor, gloria, uirtus, perpetuitas et a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

"They were bound and fell, but we have risen and stand upright." And in the book of the prophet Micah it is written: "Do not proudly rejoice over me, my enemy, because I have fallen; but I shall rise again." For we have fallen in this world, but in Christ we have risen, to whom be honor, glory, power, eternity, both from the ages and now and always and for all the ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 36, chapter 1

36.1.1CSEL 64:70

Omnis scriptura diuina uel naturalis uel mystica uel moralis est: naturalis in Genesi, in qua exprimitur, quomodo facta sunt caelum maria, terrae et quemadmodum mundus iste sit constitutus; mystica in Leuitico, in quo comprehenditur sacerdotale mysterium; moralis in Deuteronomio, in quo secundum legis praeceptum uita humana formatur. unde et Salomonis tres libri ex plurimis uidentur electi: Ecclesiastes de naturalibus, Cantica canticorum de mysticis, Prouerbia de moralibus.

All divine Scripture is either natural or mystical or moral: natural in Genesis, in which it is expressed how heaven, seas and lands were made and how this world was established; mystical in Leviticus, in which the priestly mystery is contained; moral in Deuteronomy, in which human life is formed according to the precept of the law. Hence too three books of Solomon seem to have been chosen out of very many: Ecclesiastes on natural things, the Song of Songs on mystical, Proverbs on moral.

Explanation 36, chapter 2

36.2.1CSEL 64:70–71

Sed quia omnium psalmorum corpus unum est, idcirco nihil in his diuisum est atque distinctum, sed prout se obtulit ratio, nulla intermissa doctrinae istiusmodi disciplina est. namque et naturalem euidentissime comprehendit dicendo de angelis atque uirtutibus, sole et luna, stellis et lumine caeli caelorum et aqua quae super caelos est: quia ipse dixit et facta sunt, ipse mandauit et creata sunt. statuit ea in saeculum saeculi; praeceptum posuit, et non praeteribit.

But because the body of all the psalms is one, nothing in them is divided and distinguished; but as the occasion presented itself, no part of this kind of teaching has been left out. For it includes the natural very plainly when it speaks of angels and powers, sun and moon, stars and light, the heaven of heavens and the water above the heavens: "For he spoke and they were made, he commanded and they were created. He established them for ever and ever; he set a precept, and it will not pass away."

36.2.2CSEL 64:71

et de mysticis locutus est, cum de occultis et sacrae unctionis unguento et de consummatione scripserit tabernaculi. quorum multiplex gratia, quoniam multifariam et multis modis locutus est dominus in prophetis. nam et uenturum praefatus est dei filium principem sacerdotum, et passurum esse pro nobis et sanguine suo mundaturum nostra peccata tituli pro torcularibus declararunt et resurrecturum psalmus resurrectionis expressit, et alius postea titulus indicauit, in quo terra eius est restituta, commutationem quoque uniuersorum futuram fidei sacramentis.

And it has spoken of mystical things, since it has written of hidden things, of the ointment of sacred anointing and of the completion of the tabernacle. Their grace is manifold, since in many ways and many manners the Lord spoke in the prophets. For it foretold that the Son of God would come as chief of priests; the titles "for the winepresses" declared that he would suffer for us and cleanse our sins with his blood; the psalm of the resurrection expressed that he would rise; and another title afterwards indicated, in which his land was restored, the change also of all things that is to come through the mysteries of faith.

36.2.3CSEL 64:71

et de moralibus plura contexuit diuersaque uirtutum genera demonstrauit et dedit praecepta uiuendi, quibus ulcera nostrorum sanauit errorum moresque renouauit humanos atque intimos mutauit affectus, sicut docet psalmus tricesimus tertius, quem etiam Petrus sanctus in epistula sua tamquam medicamentum nostris pectoribus affixit, atque iste, qui nobis hodierna lectione propositus est. nam isti prae ceteris ethici repperiuntur, sed iste diffusior, qui tricesimus sextus inscribitur.

And of moral things it has woven together a great deal and shown different kinds of virtues and given precepts for living, by which it has healed the sores of our errors, renewed human conduct and changed our inmost feelings, as the thirty-third psalm teaches, which holy Peter too fixed in his epistle on our hearts like a plaster, and this one, which has been set before us in today's reading. For these are found to be ethical above the others, but this one more fully, which is entitled the thirty-sixth.

36.2.4CSEL 64:71–72

nam etsi ille praedulcis et lucidus est, iste tamen dulcior, quia ille me docuit cohibere linguam a malo, iste desinere ab ira, indignationem relinquere, ille praecepit sine dolo loqui, iste instituit esse mansuetum, qui praemia mansuetudinis demonstrauit. quae maiora fomenta sunt cordis humani quam mansuetudo atque simplicitas, quibus et dolor omnis acceptae leuatur iniuriae et labes criminis omnis excluditur?

For although that one is very sweet and clear, this one is sweeter, because that one taught me to restrain my tongue from evil, this one to cease from anger and leave indignation; that one directed me to speak without deceit, this one trained me to be gentle, for it showed the rewards of gentleness. What greater salves are there for the human heart than gentleness and simplicity, by which every pain of an injury received is relieved and every stain of crime is shut out?

Explanation 36, chapter 3

36.3.1CSEL 64:72

Ad haec igitur manum medicamenta mittamus, ut uulnera nostra curemus, ne, si uelimus dicere quod alios curare possimus, dicatur nobis: medice, cura te ipsum. ergo quod etiam non medicis, sed uulgo quoque solet esse commune, ut medicinam pauci profiteantur, plurimi tamen remedia eius aliqua scire se dicant, uel quod medicorum pueri faciunt, nos quoque alieno medicamento remedium indigentibus deferamus.

To these remedies, then, let us put our hand, to cure our wounds, lest, if we wish to say that we can cure others, it be said to us: "Physician, heal yourself." So, as is common not only to physicians but to ordinary people too, that few profess medicine but very many say they know some of its remedies, or as physicians' boys do, let us too bring a remedy to the needy from another's medicine.

36.3.2CSEL 64:72

diues magistrum adhibeat, pauper ministrum. qui perfecti altitudinem capit, sumat ex ipso, qui planiora desiderat, in ualle pascatur, ut paruulus, qui fluuium metuit, de riuulo bibit et qui profundum pauet, ad litora natat. pulchre autem sanctus Dauid in superiore psalmo iniusti uitam describit, hic iusti; ibi iniustus exponitur, hic iustus instituitur; ille sibi delinquit, hic tollit etiam aliena peccata. et ideo quod primum medicamentum sit iustitiae, consideremus.

Let the rich man engage a master, the poor man an assistant. Let him who grasps the height of the perfect take from the psalm itself; let him who desires plainer things graze in the valley, as a little child who fears the river drinks from the brook, and one who is afraid of the deep swims by the shore. Finely holy David describes in the previous psalm the life of the unjust man, here that of the just; there the unjust man is set out, here the just man is trained; the one sins against himself, the other takes away even the sins of others. So let us consider what the first remedy of justice is.

Explanation 36, chapter 4

36.4.1CSEL 64:72–73

Noli, inquit, malignari inter malignantes neque aemulatus fueris facientes iniquitatem. primum discamus quid sit aemulari, licet minor uis sermonis huius sit in Latino quam in Graeco; nam et in bono aemulationem legimus et in malo. denique apostolus dicit: bonum est aemulari in bono semper, et supra ipse dixit: aemulantur uos non bene, sed excludere uos uolunt, ut illos aemulemini, et iterum ipse ait: aemulamini meliora charismata. ad Romanos habes: dico ergo: numquid sic offenderunt ut caderent? absit; sed illorum delictum salus est gentibus, ut illos aemulentur, et infra: uobis enim dico gentibus: quamdiu ego sum gentium apostolus, ministerium meum inlustrabo, si quo modo aemuler carnem meam et saluos faciam aliquos ex ipsis, hoc est: afficiam carnem meam; denique παραζηλώσω Graecus habet. nam et hic μὴ παραζήλου ἐν πονηρευομένοις habet et μηδὲ ζήλου τοὺς ποιοῦντας τὴν ἀνομίαν, hoc est: noli malignos in aemulationem excitare, quoniam illi non de bono, sed de malo certant.

"Do not be malicious," he says, "among the malicious, and do not envy those who do iniquity." First let us learn what it is to be emulous, although the force of this word is less in Latin than in Greek; for we read of emulation both in a good sense and in a bad. Indeed the apostle says: "It is good always to be emulous in a good thing"; and above he himself said: "They are zealous for you not well, but they want to shut you out, so that you may be zealous for them"; and again he says: "Be emulous for the better gifts." To the Romans you have: "I say, then: did they so stumble as to fall? Far from it; but by their offense salvation has come to the Gentiles, to make them emulous"; and below: "For I say to you Gentiles: as long as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I will glorify my ministry, if somehow I may provoke my own flesh to emulation and save some of them," that is: I may move my flesh; indeed the Greek has παραζηλώσω ("I will provoke to jealousy"). For here too it has μὴ παραζήλου ἐν πονηρευομένοις and μηδὲ ζήλου τοὺς ποιοῦντας τὴν ἀνομίαν, that is: do not provoke the malicious to emulation, since they contend not about good but about evil.

Explanation 36, chapter 5

36.5.1CSEL 64:73

Quid est in aemulationem excitare? exemplo, si possumus, aperiamus. intemperantes mulieres quaedam sunt, quae aliorum coniugum corda sollicitant. quos cum suae consuetudini probroque subdiderint, non contentae erroris sui habere secretum student coram iugalibus eorum suum iactare flagitium, ut eas in zelum sui excitent et inflamment triumphum quendam de dolore probarum mentium et commotione captantes.

What is "to provoke to emulation"? Let us show it by an example, if we can. There are certain immoderate women who tempt the hearts of other women's husbands. When they have subjected them to their own habit and shame, not content to keep their error secret, they are eager to flaunt their shameful deed before the men's wives, so as to rouse and inflame them to jealousy of them, seizing a kind of triumph from the pain and agitation of virtuous minds.

36.5.2CSEL 64:73

quae aemulatione feminea tori proprii contumeliam non ferentes soluunt conplaciti uincla coniugii aut cotidiana lite decernunt fitque ex aemulatione discordia, ex dissensione dissidium, quo domus tota turbetur. exemplo igitur proteruae mulieris cognosce, qui legis, partes esse nequissimae detestabilisque uersutiae inproba aemulatione alterius animam commouere aliudque esse zelum, aliud parazelum.

The wives, who with a woman's jealousy cannot bear the insult to their own marriage bed, either dissolve the bonds of the marriage they had agreed to, or contend in daily quarrels; and from emulation comes discord, from dissension separation, by which the whole house is thrown into confusion. By the example of a wanton woman, then, recognize, reader, that it is the part of the vilest and most detestable cunning to stir another's soul by wicked emulation, and that jealousy is one thing, provoking to jealousy another.

36.5.3CSEL 64:73–74

haec est enim praua aemulatio quae bonorum subintrat affectum, qua etiam Iudaeus errauit, qui a uero et bono euangelicae disciplinae deuius legis aemulatione deflexit, sicut de se apostolus ait, quod secundum aemulationem legis persequebatur ecclesiam Christi.

For this is the depraved emulation that steals into the affection of good people, by which the Jew too erred, who, straying from the true and good of the gospel discipline, was turned aside by emulation of the law, as the apostle says of himself, that in zeal for the law he persecuted the church of Christ.

Explanation 36, chapter 6

36.6.1CSEL 64:74

Ergo quamuis deus noster ingratis Iudaeorum offenderetur frequenter affectibus et querelis, tamen adsumptum semel et electum sibi populum minime relinquebat; sed synagoga tamquam meretrix procax irritare eum coepit in aemulationis amaritudinem praeuaricationis se miscendo sacrilegiis. denique dixit ad sacerdotem Aaron:

So, although our God was often offended by the ungrateful feelings and complaints of the Jews, he did not abandon the people he had once taken up and chosen for himself; but the synagogue, like a wanton harlot, began to provoke him to the bitterness of jealousy by mixing itself in the sacrileges of transgression. Indeed they said to the priest Aaron:

36.6.2CSEL 64:74

fac nobis deos, ut adoremus, et uituli caput adorare coeperunt. unde per canticum magnum Moysi dominus in ore ipsius resultauit dicens: ipsi excitauerunt me in aemulationem in non deo, irritauerunt me in simulacris suis; ego autem excitabo eos in aemulationem in non gente, in.

"Make us gods that we may worship," and they began to worship the head of a calf. Hence through the great song of Moses the Lord resounded in his mouth, saying: "They provoked me to jealousy with what is not God, they angered me with their idols; and I will provoke them to jealousy with what is not a nation, with a

36.6.3CSEL 64:74

natione insipienti irritabo eos. en quomodo dominus condemnauit synagogam propter meretricios mores, quo ipsorum in eos uersutiam retorqueret et suo afficerentur ingenio, qui dominum deum suum, a quo assumpti fuerant, grauibus sacrilegiis refutarunt deos sibi quos colerent eligentes, assumens e contrario sibi ecclesiam de profanis, quos praelatos sibi sine lege, sine gratia Iudaeorum populus ingemesceret atque eo amplius in aemulationem illorum excitaretur affectus, quo uiliorum facta esset electio;

foolish nation I will anger them." See how the Lord condemned the synagogue for its harlot's ways, so as to turn their own cunning back on them and let them be moved by their own device, who rejected the Lord their God, by whom they had been taken up, with grave sacrileges, choosing for themselves gods to worship; while he for his part took for himself the church from the profane, so that the Jewish people would groan that these were preferred to them without law, without grace, and their feeling would be roused to jealousy of them the more, the meaner those chosen were;

36.6.4CSEL 64:74–75

nam ante quo afficeretur populus non habebat, cum solum se a domino consideraret electum. ubi uero aduertit adscitam ex nationibus conuenam plebem, quae sibi legem domini, prophetarum oracula, testamentum nouum domini uindicaret, tunc demum excruciari nimio coepit affectu, posteaquam se repudiatum esse cognouit. denique si uideat gentilium caeremonias, non mouetur; si audiat profectum ecclesiae, misera torquetur inuidia. completur ergo in Iudaea: et ego in aemulationem eos excitabo in non gente.

for before the people had nothing to be moved by, since it considered that it alone was chosen by the Lord. But when it noticed a people gathered in from the nations, which claimed for itself the Lord's law, the oracles of the prophets, the Lord's new testament, then at last it began to be tormented with excessive feeling, after it learned that it had been repudiated. Indeed if it sees the ceremonies of the Gentiles, it is not moved; if it hears of the progress of the church, it is tormented with wretched envy. So it is fulfilled in Judea: "And I will provoke them to jealousy with what is not a nation."

Explanation 36, chapter 7

36.7.1CSEL 64:75

Accedit ad cruciatus grauioris aerumnam, quod ex gentibus peccatores sibi uidentur esse praelati, qui ne gentis quidem alicuius aut nationis nomen attollant. nam omnis congregatio cuiusque regionis nomen sibi uindicare consueuit, ut Aegyptii Aethiopes Syri Iudaei Arabes prouinciae suae terrarumque suarum uocabulum praeferunt.

To the misery of a heavier torment is added this, that sinners from the Gentiles seem to have been preferred to them, who do not even bear the name of any nation or people. For every gathering of any region is accustomed to claim a name for itself, as Egyptians, Ethiopians, Syrians, Jews, Arabs bear the title of their province and lands.

36.7.2CSEL 64:75

nos de diuersis populis congregati uocabulum nobis unius gentis non possumus usurpare et ideo, quia nomen non habebamus in terris, de caelo accepimus, ut Christi populus diceremur. sed hoc gentilis stultitiam putat, Iudaeus obprobrium. uerum est ergo quod scriptum est, quia ultus est deus propriam contumeliam ecclesiam sibi ex non gente quaerendo et eam ex gente insipiente uetusto illi atque regali populo praeferendo.

We, gathered from different peoples, cannot take for ourselves the name of one nation; and so, because we had no name on earth, we received one from heaven, so as to be called Christ's people. But the pagan thinks this folly, the Jew a reproach. True, then, is what is written, that God avenged the insult to himself by seeking a church for himself from a non-nation and preferring it, from a foolish nation, to that ancient and royal people.

36.7.3CSEL 64:75

quae sit gens insipiens quae praelata sit, audi dicentem: quoniam stulta mundi elegit deus, ut confundat sapientes, et iterum: si quis uidetur sapiens esse inter uos in hoc saeculo, stultus fiat, ut sit sapiens. reddidit ergo, non intulit dominus aemulationis commotionem, ut esset non in forma imitationis, sed in poena iniquitatis.

Hear one saying what the foolish nation is that has been preferred: "For God chose the foolish things of the world to confound the wise," and again: "If anyone among you seems wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise." So the Lord returned, did not inflict, the disturbance of jealousy, so that it might be not in the form of imitation but in the punishment of iniquity.

Explanation 36, chapter 8

36.8.1CSEL 64:75–76

Denique Latinus interpres uolens distinctionem facere inter aemulationem uirtutis et aemulationem offensionis ait: numquid aemulamur domino? hoc est: numquid domino offensionem aemulationis inferimus, ut de his edamus quae immolata simulacris sunt, sicut Iudaei eum sacrificando simulacris exasperarunt? quodsi inter homines excitandae aemulationis offendit intentio et frequenter persona exasperati superior inuenitur, quod incentori aemulationis fraudi esse consueuit, cuius stultitiae est maiestatem irritare diuinam et offendiculo aemulationis incessere, ubi nulla ultionis est difficultas!

Indeed the Latin translator, wishing to distinguish between emulation of virtue and emulation of offense, says: "Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy?" that is: do we bring on the Lord the offense of jealousy by eating of things sacrificed to idols, as the Jews exasperated him by sacrificing to idols? And if among men the intention of stirring jealousy gives offense, and often the person exasperated is found to be the stronger, which usually turns to the harm of the instigator, what folly it is to provoke the divine majesty and assail it with the stumbling-block of jealousy, where vengeance has no difficulty!

Explanation 36, chapter 9

36.9.1CSEL 64:76

Non debemus igitur malignis aemulandi aduersum nos aculeos ministrare, qui etiam non lacessiti inuidiae stimulis excitantur ut noceant, sicut Cain fratrem occidit, quia magis illius sacrificium acceptum est quam quod ipse putauerat offerendum; in quo non aemulatus Abel, sed inuidus Cain praelationis gratiam scelesto parricidio persecutus est. non enim ille fratris uoluit obumbrare sacrificium, sed seruare sacrificii disciplinam, ut primitias nulla desi-

We must not, then, furnish the malicious with goads of jealousy against us, who, even unprovoked, are roused by the stings of envy to do harm, as Cain killed his brother because his sacrifice was accepted rather than the one he had thought fit to offer; in which Abel was not emulous, but envious Cain pursued with criminal fratricide the favor of preference. For Abel did not wish to overshadow his brother's sacrifice, but to keep the discipline of sacrifice, so that no

36.9.2CSEL 64:76

dia moraretur nec aliqua in usus proprios deriuata usurpatione uiolaret. Saul quoque triumphatorem Palaestinorum Dauid prophetam et propriae conseruatorem salutis iuuencularum sibi sermone praelatum temptauit insidiis, teli iactu parauit occidere ac paene sanguinem generi fuderat innocentis, nisi uulnus ille sinuati corporis inflexione lusisset. quae ibi malitia, si iuuenculae dixerunt: Saul in milibus, Dauid in decem milibus? quam atrox autem inuidia regis Saul, qui sermonis errorem in innocentis exitium deriuauit!

sloth should delay the firstfruits, nor any usurpation violate them by diverting them to private use. Saul too, when David the prophet, the triumpher over the Philistines and preserver of his own safety, was preferred to him in the speech of young women, assailed him with plots, prepared to kill him with the cast of a spear, and almost shed the innocent blood of his son-in-law, had not David evaded the wound by bending his body. What malice was there, if the young women said: "Saul among thousands, David among ten thousands"? But how fierce the envy of King Saul, who turned an error of speech to the ruin of an innocent man!

Explanation 36, chapter 10

36.10.1CSEL 64:76–77

Neque aemulatus, inquit, fueris facientes iniquitatem. non repetiuit, quod dixerat, sed mutauit. aliud est enim subaemulari, aliud aemulari; subaemulatio astutiam habet, aemulatio simplicitatem. sed tamen etiam ipsa cauta debet esse simplicitas et prouida, ut nouerit quid cauendum sit; neque enim otiose dictum est: estote astuti sicut serpentes et simplices sicut columbae. spiritalis ergo debet esse astutia, quae seruet salutem, dolum nesciat, spiritalis debet esse simplicitas.

"And do not envy," he says, "those who do iniquity." He did not repeat what he had said but changed it. For it is one thing to provoke to emulation, another to emulate; provoking has cunning, emulation simplicity. But even simplicity itself must be cautious and provident, so as to know what to beware of; for not idly was it said: "Be cunning as serpents and simple as doves." Cunning, then, must be spiritual, preserving salvation and knowing no deceit; simplicity must be spiritual.

36.10.2CSEL 64:77

uidetur autem etiam alio loco distinctionem subaemulationis scriptura fecisse, cum dicit: et auferetur zelus Ephrem et inimici Iudae peribunt; non erit aemulus Ephrem Iudae et Iuda non uexabit Ephrem. alibi autem habet: sic et uos, quoniam aemulatores estis spiritalium aedificationem ecclesiae quaerite ut abundetis. aemulatores pro bonis et bonae rei imitatoribus posuit, aemulum pro oblico et inuido.

Scripture seems to have made the distinction of provoking to emulation in another place too, when it says: "And the jealousy of Ephraim will be taken away and the enemies of Judah will perish; Ephraim will not be the rival of Judah, and Judah will not vex Ephraim." But elsewhere it has: "So you too, since you are emulous of spiritual gifts, seek the building up of the church, that you may abound." He used "emulous" for the good and imitators of a good thing, "rival" for the oblique and envious.

Explanation 36, chapter 11

36.11.1CSEL 64:77

Primum est ergo, ne malignos ad aemulationis malignitatem lacessas, secundum, ut non aemuleris iniquitatem facientes. plerumque enim uidentes pii fraude aliquos et astutia quaesisse diuitias et peruenisse ad honores aemulatione deformi uias eorum sequi gestiunt, ut ad diuitias et honores simili arte perueniant uel in contrahendo coniugio circumscribant adulescentulas.

The first, then, is not to provoke the malicious to the malice of rivalry; the second, not to envy those who do iniquity. For often the pious, seeing that some have sought riches by fraud and cunning and reached honors, long, with an ugly emulation, to follow their ways, so as to reach riches and honors by a like art, or to trick young girls in contracting marriage.

36.11.2CSEL 64:77

quid enim prodest, cum ipsae diuitiae et omnis gloria saecularis tamquam faenum cito arescat et tamquam holera herbarum in ipsa specie sui floris intercidant? omnis caro faenum et omnis gloria hominis ut flos faeni. noli ergo magnopere affectare quod perpetuum esse non possit, noli esse aemulus et oblicus, noli esse contentiosus et decertator in zelo. unde et Aquilas dixit: noli concertare in malignantibus, Symmachus: noli contendere.

For what does it profit, when riches themselves and all worldly glory dry up like hay and perish like garden herbs in the very beauty of their flower? "All flesh is hay, and all the glory of man like the flower of hay." Do not, then, greatly strive after what cannot be lasting; do not be a rival and oblique; do not be contentious and a combatant in jealousy. Hence Aquila too said: "Do not compete among the malicious"; Symmachus: "Do not contend."

36.11.3CSEL 64:77–78

Noli etiam esse imitator iniquitatis et fraudis, sed esto apostolicae doctrinae, propheticae gratiae sanctorumque uirtutis imitator, ut fructum feras et messem bonitatis recondas, sicut Ioseph, qui multitudine frumenti famem diuturnae sterilitatis exclusit, ut Habacuc, qui prandium messoribus deferendo eleuatus ab angelo aerii tramitis iter carpsit et redditus terris inter saeuos leonum strepitus pio prophetae dulce conuiuium ministrauit.

Do not be an imitator of iniquity and fraud either, but be an imitator of the apostles' teaching, the prophets' grace and the saints' virtue, so that you may bear fruit and store up a harvest of goodness, like Joseph, who with a multitude of grain shut out the famine of long barrenness; like Habakkuk, who, carrying lunch to the reapers, was lifted by an angel and took a path through the air, and, returned to earth amid the fierce roaring of lions, served a sweet meal to the pious prophet.

Explanation 36, chapter 12

36.12.1CSEL 64:78

Recte ergo dicit propheta: spera in domino et fac bonitatem et inhabita terram et pasceris in diuitiis eius. quae est terra quam suadet inhabitandam nisi anima tua, quam bene debes excolere, frequenter spiritalibus inarare uomeribus, ne longo inhorrescat situ? bonus enim agricola cotidiana operatione et peruigili sollicitudine exercet agrum suum et

Rightly, then, the prophet says: "Hope in the Lord and do goodness, and dwell in the land, and you will be fed in its riches." What is the land he urges you to dwell in but your soul, which you ought to cultivate well, often ploughing it with spiritual ploughshares, lest it grow rough with long neglect? For a good farmer works his field with daily labor and watchful care and

36.12.2CSEL 64:78

propria rura custodit, ne deuastet ea aper de silua et fructus maturos raptor eripiat. ara ergo terram tuam, ut, cum uenerit qui seminat uerbum, animam tuam inueniat praeparatam, ne supra inculta cordis tui decidat semen et ueniant aues caeli et diripiant quod fuerit seminatum. quae sit ergo terra, audi dicentem: ecce exiit qui seminat seminare agrum suum. et dum seminat, aliud cecidit secus uiam, aliud supra petram, aliud supra terram bonam. quod autem supra terram bonam, hi sunt qui in corde bono

guards his own fields, lest the boar from the forest lay them waste and a robber snatch the ripe fruit. Plough your land, then, so that when he comes who sows the word he may find your soul prepared, lest the seed fall on the uncultivated parts of your heart and the birds of heaven come and snatch what has been sown. Hear one saying, then, what the land is: "Behold, the sower went out to sow his field. And as he sowed, some fell by the way, some on rock, some on good ground." And what fell on good ground, these are those who with a good heart

36.12.3CSEL 64:78

audientes uerbum retinent et fructum afferunt per patientiam. mundum sit ergo cor tuum, munda sit anima tua, ut fructum bonitatis possis afferre, hoc est gratiae spiritalis. bonitas enim fructus est spiritus sancti, sicut scriptum est: fructus autem spiritus est caritas, gaudium, pax, patientia, benignitas, bonitas, fides, modestia, continentia. hi sunt fructus, quorum diuitiis pascimur et ubertate satiamur. in hac terra uitem illam fructiferam iustus Noe plantauit et de fructu eius bibit

hear the word, keep it, and bear fruit through patience. Let your heart, then, be clean, let your soul be clean, so that you can bear the fruit of goodness, that is, of spiritual grace. For goodness is a fruit of the Holy Spirit, as it is written: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, modesty, continence." These are the fruits on whose riches we are fed and with whose abundance we are filled. In this land righteous Noah planted that fruitful vine, and drank of its fruit

36.12.4CSEL 64:78–79

atque intimo corde solutus est, quando eum laudabili pietatis amictu induit uirtutum suarum geminata posteritas. alio quoque loco nobis istas propheta sanctus diuitias demonstrauit, quibus erat diues in Christo et omnibus, quae ad uitam aeternam conducerent, abundauit. et re uera quis ditior quam qui diues in domino est, ut possit dicere: in uia testimoniorum tuorum delectatus sum quasi in omnibus diuitiis? quid enim poterat deesse uiro qui caelestibus ditabatur oraculis? et ideo suadet hoc psalmo, ut thesaurum illum nobis quaeramus aeternum et delectationem eius adquisitione capiamus.

and was loosened in his inmost heart, when his twofold descendants clothed him with the praiseworthy cloak of their piety and virtues. In another place too the holy prophet showed us these riches, in which he was rich in Christ and abounded in all things that lead to eternal life. And indeed who is richer than he who is rich in the Lord, so that he can say: "In the way of your testimonies I have delighted as in all riches"? For what could be lacking to a man who was enriched by heavenly oracles? And so in this psalm he urges us to seek for ourselves that eternal treasure and take delight in its acquisition.

Explanation 36, chapter 13

36.13.1CSEL 64:79

Ideoque ait: delectare in domino, et dabit tibi petitiones cordis tui. quare non dixit tuas, sed cordis tui petitiones? etenim petitiones exterioris hominis interiorisque communes non sunt nec omnes probantur a Christo, quia lex carnis legi mentis frequenter repugnat. quae autem interioris sunt hominis, qui renouatus est spiritu, illas petitiones dominus petitus donat effectu.

And so he says: "Delight in the Lord, and he will give you the requests of your heart." Why did he not say "your requests" but "the requests of your heart"? For the requests of the outer man and the inner are not common, nor are all approved by Christ, since the law of the flesh often fights against the law of the mind. But those requests that belong to the inner man, renewed by the Spirit, the Lord, when asked, grants in effect.

36.13.2CSEL 64:79

unde et alibi ait: tribuat tibi dominus secundum cor tuum et omnes petitiones tuas confirmet. secundum cor ait, non secundum appetentiam carnis et illas petitiones, inquit, quae prodeunt ex intimo corde, confirmet, non quae ex carnis huius inlecebra et uoluptatibus diriguntur.

Hence he says elsewhere too: "May the Lord grant you according to your heart and confirm all your requests." He says "according to the heart," not according to the appetite of the flesh; and may he confirm, he says, those requests which come from the inmost heart, not those directed by the enticement and pleasures of this flesh.

Explanation 36, chapter 14

36.14.1CSEL 64:79

Reuela ad dominum uiam tuam et spera in eum, et ipse faciet; et educet sicut lumen iustitiam tuam et iudicium tuum sicut meridiem. hoc solo uersiculo qualis esse debeas declarauit; quis enim reuelat uiam suam nisi qui deo occultorum suorum arbitro interna sui pectoris confitetur?

"Reveal your way to the Lord and hope in him, and he himself will act; and he will bring forth your justice like light and your judgment like noonday." By this one verse he has declared what you ought to be; for who reveals his way but he who confesses the inner things of his heart to God, the judge of his secrets?

36.14.2CSEL 64:79

bene ait reuela, hoc est: aperi conscientiam tuam, ne eam saeculi istius grauet umbra uel carnis. prorumpentia enim semina si fuerint obumbrata, tenuantur, soli obiecta pinguescunt. quid de seminibus loquor? ipsas arbusculas, quo minus sese in altum subiciant, umbra siluestris internecat et prohibet brachia ramosa diffundere.

Well does he say "reveal," that is, open your conscience, lest the shadow of this world or of the flesh weigh it down. For sprouting seeds, if overshadowed, grow thin; exposed to the sun they grow fat. Why speak of seeds? The shade of the forest kills even shrubs, so that they do not rise on high, and prevents them from spreading their branching arms.

36.14.3CSEL 64:79–80

pulchre autem dixit: reuela ad dominum uiam tuam, quia natura hominum prona peccato uelut quoddam menti nostrae uelamen obducit, ne nostra domino peccata fateamur, qui potest uulnera nostra sanare,

And finely he says: "Reveal your way to the Lord," because human nature, prone to sin, draws a kind of veil over our mind, so that we do not confess our sins to the Lord, who can heal our wounds,

36.14.4CSEL 64:80

ut erubescat quis ore proprio postulare medicinam, ne coram hominibus sua prodantur obprobria. premit igitur se intra hominem conscientia, cum latere non possit, et tamdiu differt, quoad uulnus efferueat, ut iam non fidei salubritate, sed inmedicabili atrocitate ulceris detegatur. reuela, inquit, ad dominum uiam tuam, hoc est: aperi uiam tuam, noli abscondere, sicut abscondebat Cain, qui latere cupiebat;

so that a man is ashamed to ask for medicine with his own mouth, lest his disgraces be exposed before men. So conscience presses itself in within a man, though it cannot be hidden, and puts off so long that the wound festers, until it is uncovered no longer by the health of faith but by the incurable fierceness of the ulcer. "Reveal," he says, "your way to the Lord," that is, open your way, do not hide it, as Cain hid it, who wished to lie hidden;

36.14.5CSEL 64:80

omnis enim qui male agit odit lucem. reuelabat Dauid uiam suam, qui ait: dico ego opera mea regi. aperi sensum tuum, ut nihil sit quod timeas reprehendi; reuelauit et Paulus, qui praesumpsit dicere: nihil mihi conscius sum. is actus, ea uita sit, ut uia tua coram patre tuo luceat qui in caelis est.

for "everyone who does evil hates the light." David revealed his way, who said: "I tell my works to the king." Open your mind, so that there is nothing you fear to be blamed for; Paul too revealed his, who dared to say: "I am conscious of nothing against myself." Let your action, your life be such that your way may shine before your Father who is in heaven.

Explanation 36, chapter 15

36.15.1CSEL 64:80

Sed quia obnoxia fragilitati omnis humana condicio est et non nostrae est potestatis iter nostrum ex uoluntate dirigere, ideo tibi dicit: spera in domino, et ipse faciet, hoc est: ut aperiat uiam tuam nec talem te esse permittat, ut fugias lucem, dum times prodi, et diligas tenebras, ut tua possis occultare flagitia dicens: tenebrae operiunt me;

But because every human condition is subject to frailty and it is not in our power to direct our path by our will, he therefore says to you: "Hope in the Lord, and he himself will act," that is, to open your way and not allow you to be such as to flee the light, fearing to be exposed, and love darkness so as to be able to hide your shameful deeds, saying: "Darkness covers me;

36.15.2CSEL 64:80

quis scit si uidet altissimus? quomodo enim potest, qui adulterium molitur, non noctem suis accommodam quaerere temptamentis, qui falsum cogitat, testem suae fraudi adhibere, qui corruptelam iudicis captat, ut opprimat innocentem, iniquitatis non explorare secretum? latro solitudines obsidet, noctis tenebras operitur, ut sceleri cedat effectus.

who knows whether the Most High sees?" For how can he who plots adultery not seek a night suited to his attempts, he who plans falsehood not bring a witness to his fraud, he who seeks to corrupt a judge in order to crush the innocent not explore the secrecy of iniquity? The robber besets lonely places and covers himself with the darkness of night so that his crime may succeed.

36.15.3CSEL 64:80–81

iniquitas ergo tenebrae sunt, deus lux est. et si tu uelis tuam occultare iustitiam, deus eam educit in lucem nec patitur latere iudicium, quo ea quae bona sunt elegisti, quae improba refutasti. nec solum facit tuum lucere iudicium, sed lucere sicut meridiem. quando se sol iste in splendorem totus effundit, meridies est; meridies erat, quando Ioseph cum fratribus epulabatur non ultus iniuriam, sed oblitus.

Iniquity, then, is darkness; God is light. And even if you wish to hide your justice, God brings it out into the light and does not allow the judgment to lie hidden by which you chose what is good and rejected what is wicked. And he not only makes your judgment shine, but shine like noonday. When this sun pours itself out wholly into splendor, it is noon; it was noon when Joseph feasted with his brothers, not avenging the injury but forgetting it.

Explanation 36, chapter 16

36.16.1CSEL 64:81

Subditus esto domino et obsecra eum. non solum ut subiectus domino sis, moneris, sed etiam ut obsecres dominum, quo possis tuae studium subiectionis implere, sicut et supra ait: reuela domino uiam tuam et spera in eum. non solum reuelare uiam tuam te conuenit, sed etiam sperare in domino. bona autem subiectio non abiecta, non uilis, sed gloriosa atque sublimis; ille enim subditus deo est qui facit domini uoluntatem.

"Be subject to the Lord and entreat him." You are warned not only to be subject to the Lord but also to entreat the Lord, so that you may fulfil your zeal for subjection; as he said above: "Reveal your way to the Lord and hope in him." It is fitting not only to reveal your way but also to hope in the Lord. Good subjection is not abject, not base, but glorious and sublime; for he is subject to God who does the Lord's will.

36.16.2CSEL 64:81

denique quis ignorat, quod sapientia mentis praestantior quam carnis sapientia sit? sapientia autem mentis subiecta est dei legi, sapientia carnis non est subdita, et addidit apostolus: nec enim potest. esto ergo subditus, hoc est proximus Christo, ut legem impleas. denique Christus faciendo uoluntatem patris legem impleuit et ideo finis est legis et plenitudo est caritatis, quia diligens patrem effectum omnem eius adhibuit uoluntati.

Indeed, who does not know that the wisdom of the mind is more excellent than the wisdom of the flesh? And the wisdom of the mind is subject to God's law, the wisdom of the flesh is not subject, and the apostle added: "nor can it be." Be subject, then, that is, near to Christ, so that you may fulfil the law. Indeed Christ fulfilled the law by doing the Father's will, and so he is the end of the law and the fullness of love, because, loving the Father, he applied all his effort to his will.

36.16.3CSEL 64:81–82

unde pro gloria apostolus dixit: cum autem subiecta illi fuerint omnia, tunc et ipse subiectus erit illi qui sibi subiecit omnia, ut sit deus omnia in omnibus, et ipse de ait: nonne deo subdita est anima mea? ab ipso enim salutare meum. denique pro pietate erat, non pro infirmitate Ioseph et Mariae parentibus subditus. gloria autem Christi maxima, ut se uniuersorum hominum pectoribus infundat et omnes reuocet ab impietate perfidiae et gentilitatis

Hence the apostle said as a matter of glory: "But when all things have been subjected to him, then he himself also will be subject to him who subjected all things to himself, that God may be all in all"; and he himself says: "Is not my soul subject to God? For from him is my salvation." Indeed it was out of piety, not weakness, that he was subject to his parents Joseph and Mary. And Christ's greatest glory is to pour himself into the hearts of all men and call all back from the ungodliness of faithlessness and the attachment to paganism,

36.16.4CSEL 64:82

affectu, ut sibi faciat esse subiectos. cum autem sibi subiecerit omnia, cum intrauerit plenitudo gentium et saluus factus fuerit omnis Israel et toto orbe unum fuerit corpus in Christo, tunc erit et ipse subiectus, munus suum deo patri offerens et quasi princeps omnium sacerdotum et caelestibus compos altaribus, ut sit sacrificium fides omnium. pietatis ergo est ista subiectio, quod

so as to make them subject to himself. But when he has subjected all things to himself, when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in and all Israel has been saved and there is one body in Christ in the whole world, then he himself will be subject, offering his gift to God the Father, as the chief of all priests and possessor of the heavenly altars, so that the faith of all may be the sacrifice. This subjection, then, is one of piety, in that

36.16.5CSEL 64:82

erit subiectus in corpore dominus Iesus, cuius nos sumus corpus et membra. esto ergo, homo, subiectus Christo, hoc est: subditus sapientiae dei, subditus uerbo, subditus iustitiae, subditus uirtuti, quia haec omnia Christus est. omnis homo deo se subiciat; non enim

the Lord Jesus will be subject in his body, whose body and members we are. Be subject, then, O man, to Christ, that is, subject to the wisdom of God, subject to the Word, subject to justice, subject to power, because Christ is all these. Let every man subject himself to God; for

36.16.6CSEL 64:82

unum, sed omnes docet, ut subiciant cor suum, subiciant animam suam, subiciant carnem suam, quo sit deus omnia et in omnibus. subiectus ergo est qui plenus est gratiae et suscipit iugum Christi et mandata domini strenue et incunctanter exequitur, sine subiectione autem, qui se frustra extollit sensu propriae carnis inflatus, insolens deuotionis et piae declinans obseruantiam seruitutis, quam ipso iure naturae auctori debemus aeterno. postremo qui sine peccato est subiectus est Christo, quoniam redemptus a domino est; qui autem in peccato est, non potest dici liber, sed seruus, quem grauia tenent uincla peccati.

he teaches not one but all to subject their heart, subject their soul, subject their flesh, so that God may be all in all. He is subject, then, who is full of grace and takes up the yoke of Christ and carries out the Lord's commands vigorously and without delay; but he is without subjection who exalts himself in vain, puffed up by the sense of his own flesh, unaccustomed to devotion and turning from the observance of loving service which by the very law of nature we owe to the eternal Author. Lastly, he who is without sin is subject to Christ, because he has been redeemed by the Lord; but he who is in sin cannot be called free, but a slave, whom the heavy chains of sin hold.

Explanation 36, chapter 17

36.17.1CSEL 64:82–83

Sequitur: ne aemulatus fueris eum, qui prospere dirigitur in uia sua faciens iniquitatem. euidenter hic quid superius senserit intimauit, non excitandos malignos aemulatione ad malignitatem neque imitandos facientes iniquitatem. non enim iniquitas, sed prosperae res, quae proueniunt iniqua gerentibus, nos saepe sollicitant, ut eos putemus imitandos, quo ad eorum possimus peruenire successus, dicentes: ecce ipsi peccatores et abundantes in saeculo optinuerunt diuitias. et dixi: ergo sine causa iustificaui cor meum et laui inter innocentes manus meas et fui flagellatus tota die.

There follows: "Do not envy him who prospers in his way, doing iniquity." Here he has plainly indicated what he meant above: that the malicious are not to be roused by rivalry to malice, nor those who do iniquity imitated. For it is not iniquity but the prosperity that comes to those who act unjustly that often tempts us to think them worth imitating, so that we may reach their successes, saying: "Behold, these are sinners, and, abounding in the world, they have gained riches. And I said: then in vain have I justified my heart and washed my hands among the innocent, and I have been scourged all day long."

36.17.2CSEL 64:83

si igitur flagellatus est Dauid, cauere debemus, ne et nos flagellemur et dicatur nobis, quia diuitiae honores potentiae generationi huic uideantur esse disposita quasi uaga et incerta pecuniae opera iniquitatisque compendia, non quasi praemia ulla uirtutis ideoque uelut somnium ueniant et cum somnio te surgente deficiant. ipsos athletas, cum uicerint, certum est coronari, non antequam uincant.

If, then, David was scourged, we must take care that we are not scourged too, and that it be said to us that riches, honors, powers seem to be allotted to this generation as wandering and uncertain products of money and profits of iniquity, not as any rewards of virtue, and so they come like a dream and vanish with the dream as you rise. Athletes themselves, it is certain, are crowned when they have won, not before they win.

36.17.3CSEL 64:83

nobis lucta cum saeculo est; uince ante saeculum quam coronam petas. nemo ante coronatur, nisi certamen impleuerit. qui stadium currunt, numquid ante brauium accipiunt quam stadium percucurrerint? quanti priores in exitu cadunt et cursus sui celeritate fraudantur! numquid tu deo quam Paulus acceptior? ille uas electionis, ille gentium doctor numquam sibi in hoc saeculo coronam ausus est postulare. denique audi dicentem: certamen bonum certaui, cursum consummaui, fidem seruaui; quod reliquum, reposita est mihi iustitiae corona, quam reddet mihi dominus in illo die.

Our wrestling is with the world; conquer the world before you seek the crown. No one is crowned before he has completed the contest. Do those who run the race receive the prize before they have run the course? How many who were ahead fall at the finish and are cheated of the speed of their running! Are you more acceptable to God than Paul? He, the vessel of election, the teacher of the Gentiles, never dared to ask for a crown for himself in this world. Indeed hear him saying: "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith; for the rest, there is laid up for me the crown of justice, which the Lord will give me on that day."

36.17.4CSEL 64:83

Paulus ille raptus in tertium caelum - qui audiuit ea quae non licet homini loqui, utrum corpore esset raptus an sine corpore, nescit, sicut ipse testatus est -, Paulus ergo dicit in illa die coronam sibi esse reddendam: tu hic tibi ut reddatur insistis? imple ergo certaminis tui tempus. non semel athleta luctatur nec semel proeliatur miles, ut stipendia sua possit implere; et tibi non cum una passione luctamen est.

Paul, who was caught up to the third heaven (who heard things that it is not lawful for a man to speak, and whether he was caught up in the body or without the body he does not know, as he himself testified), Paul, then, says that the crown is to be given him on that day: and do you insist that it be given you here? Complete, then, the time of your contest. An athlete does not wrestle once, nor does a soldier fight once, so as to complete his service; and you too have a struggle not with one passion only.

Explanation 36, chapter 18

36.18.1CSEL 64:83–84

Superiores si euaseris passiones, ira succedit et ideo tibi dicit scriptura: desine ab ira et relinque indignationem. sunt multa uitia quae obrepunt insipientibus. ira grauis passio est; plerumque accendit inuitum et uolentem mitius uindicare in furorem rapit, ut perimat quem putauerit coercendum. com-

If you have escaped the earlier passions, anger follows; and so Scripture says to you: "Cease from anger and forsake indignation." There are many vices that creep up on the unwise. Anger is a heavy passion; it often kindles a man against his will, and, when he wants to punish mildly, sweeps him into fury, so that he kills one he thought should be corrected.

36.18.2CSEL 64:84

motus gladio saepe transuerberat innocentem, amicos et fratres per indignationem plurimi peremerunt. ideo sapiens dicit: ira perdit etiam sapientes. Salomonis dictum est, quia non solum quoscumque de medio homines, sed etiam ipsos perdat ira sapientes. et Dauid sapientem monet dicens: desine ab ira, ne, cum accenderis illa, non desinat priusquam te eius flamma consumat. relinque, inquit, indignationem, hoc est: natura te rapit, mouet affectus, culpa te alicuius excitat uel offensa, ut indigneris, sed non usque quaque, ut modum nescias:

Stirred up, he often runs an innocent man through with the sword; very many have killed friends and brothers through indignation. So the wise man says: "Anger destroys even the wise." It is a saying of Solomon that anger destroys not only any men from the crowd but the wise themselves. And David warns the wise man, saying: "Cease from anger," lest, once you are kindled by it, it should not cease before its flame consumes you. "Forsake," he says, "indignation," that is: nature sweeps you along, feeling moves you, someone's fault or offense rouses you to be indignant; but not without limit, so that you know no measure:

36.18.3CSEL 64:84

relinque eam, finem inpone, ne te in peccatum trahat. hoc est quod supra dixit: irascimini et nolite peccare. non enim hortatur ut irascaris, sed ad tempus cedit affectui, dat tamen medicamentum, ne diutius uis ulceris serpat. irascimini, quod ait, tuae est passionis. medicus enim non statim adhibet medicamenta languori. si dolor feruet, fomenta adhibet, ut mitescat dolor; si febris

forsake it, put an end to it, lest it draw you into sin. This is what he said above: "Be angry and do not sin." For he does not urge you to be angry, but for a time yields to the feeling, yet gives a remedy, lest the force of the sore creep further. "Be angry," as he says, belongs to your passion. For a physician does not at once apply medicines to an illness. If the pain is burning, he applies poultices so that the pain may ease; if the fever

36.18.4CSEL 64:84

exaestuat, remedii tempus expectat, ipsum potum sitientibus negare consueuit. non dicit: noli febrire, cum uapor feruet aegroti, sed dicit: expecta desinat febris, digeratur commotio. sic et propheta non potuit dicere homini, cuius caro ut uariis morborum, ita commotionum passionibus excitatur: non irasceris, sed dicit: desine ab ira et indignationem relinque, ne pecces;

rages, he waits for the time for the remedy, and is accustomed to deny drink itself to the thirsty. He does not say "do not be feverish" when the patient's heat is burning, but says: wait for the fever to stop, let the agitation be digested. So too the prophet could not say to man, whose flesh is stirred by various passions of agitation as by various diseases: "You shall not be angry," but he says: "Cease from anger and forsake indignation," lest you sin;

36.18.5CSEL 64:84–85

ira enim grauis est magistra, peccati. alius quoque medicus dicit: sol non occidat super iracundiam tuam, ne, dum diu differs, ueniat ille, qui calefactum corporis somno excitare consueuit, et stimulet te, inserat tibi cogitationes et in secreta se tui cordis inmergat dicens: uindica iniuriam tuam, uirum te esse cognosce; femineae infirmitatis est non capere uindictam.

for anger is a heavy teacher of sin. Another physician also says: "Let not the sun go down upon your wrath," lest, while you put it off long, he should come who is wont to rouse the warm body from sleep, and goad you, plant thoughts in you and plunge himself into the secret places of your heart, saying: "Avenge your injury, know that you are a man; it is a woman's weakness not to take vengeance.

36.18.6CSEL 64:85

ergo contemnere te debuit seruus, frater decipere, amicus illudere, et tu adhuc tuam non ulcisceris contumeliam? proscribas necesse est, gladio oportet insurgas et dolorem tuum aduersarii morte soleris. uir fuit ille, qui suum occidit inimicum; merito praedicatur, quia ita se uindicauit, ut alius irrogare ei non auderet iniuriam. his stimulis plus accenditur, plus mouetur, ut compleatur quod scriptum est: ira perdit etiam sapientes.

So a slave was to despise you, a brother deceive you, a friend mock you, and you still do not avenge your insult? You must proscribe him, you must rise up with the sword and console your pain with your adversary's death. He was a man who killed his enemy; he is rightly praised, because he avenged himself so that no one else would dare to do him wrong." With these goads he is kindled more, moved more, so that what is written is fulfilled: "Anger destroys even the wise."

Explanation 36, chapter 19

36.19.1CSEL 64:85

Ergo tu ne audias eum, ne aemuleris ut nequiter facias, quoniam qui nequiter agunt exterminabuntur. exterminantur, qui radices non habent, sicut holera uel faenum. holera infirmus manducet, tu autem uitem insere in agro tuo, uineam institue et, si uenerit Achab, qui tibi dicat: da mihi uineam tuam, ut holera mihi inseram, noli ei adquiescere, ne ex consensu tuo caduca serat, abscidat aeterna.

So do not listen to him; do not envy so as to act wickedly, "for those who act wickedly will be exterminated." Those are exterminated who have no roots, like herbs or hay. "Let the weak eat herbs"; but you, plant a vine in your field, lay out a vineyard; and if Ahab comes and says to you: "Give me your vineyard, so that I may plant herbs for myself," do not consent to him, lest by your consent he sow perishable things and cut down eternal ones.

36.19.2CSEL 64:85

ideo Nabuthe inter sanctos habetur, quia maiorum suorum hereditatem ne regi quidem putauit esse cedendam et lapidari maluit, ut uineam suam non daret in direptionem. hereditas maiorum fides uera est. extiterunt Amani regali subnixi potentia, qui templum domini putarent sibi esse tradendum, supplicia acerba minitantes. sed absit, ut apud mentem domino seruientem praeponderaret magis poenae formido quam forma pietatis.

Naboth is counted among the saints because he thought the inheritance of his ancestors should not be given up even to the king, and preferred to be stoned rather than give his vineyard to be plundered. The inheritance of our ancestors is the true faith. There arose Hamans, propped up by royal power, who thought the temple of the Lord should be handed over to them, threatening bitter punishments. But far be it that, in a mind serving the Lord, fear of punishment should outweigh the form of piety.

36.19.3CSEL 64:85–86

non praeualuit perfidia, quia fides restitit. est etiam quaedam uinea in pectoribus fidelium, de qua dicit Esaias: uinea facta est dilecto in cornu uberi. hanc uineam dominus plantauit in cordibus nostris et ideo legimus dicentem deum: ego te plantaui uitem fructiferam totam ueram. nemo ergo de agro animae nostrae hanc auferat uineam, quia benedicta est ea uinea. ideoque dictum est de sanctis:

Faithlessness did not prevail, because faith stood firm. There is also a kind of vineyard in the hearts of the faithful, of which Isaiah says: "A vineyard was made for the beloved on a fertile horn." This vineyard the Lord planted in our hearts, and so we read God saying: "I planted you a fruitful vine, wholly true." Let no one, then, take this vineyard from the field of our soul, for that vineyard is blessed. And so it was said of the saints:

36.19.4CSEL 64:86

a fructu frumenti, uini et olei multiplicati sunt. bonum est ergo habere intra te torcularia uino redundantia, ut fluat tibi uinum in uas tuum de uinea Sorech, poculum illud inebrians quam praeclarum. Sorech enim uinea noui principii, nouae aequitatis. unde et dicitur nobis: cantate deo uestro canticum nouum; principium eius, magnificate nomen eius ab extremo terrae. haec ergo uinea uuas faciat, non iniquitatem. ideo relicta est uinea Iudaeorum, quia iniquitatem fecit, ut scriptum est, et non iudicium. nos ergo fructum feramus in Christo, ut perpetui esse mereamur.

"By the fruit of grain, wine and oil they were multiplied." It is good, then, to have within you winepresses overflowing with wine, so that wine may flow into your vessel from the vineyard of Sorek, that cup that makes drunk, how excellent. For Sorek is the vineyard of the new beginning, of the new equity. Hence it is said to us too: "Sing to your God a new song; his beginning, magnify his name from the end of the earth." Let this vineyard, then, make grapes, not iniquity. That is why the vineyard of the Jews was abandoned, because it made iniquity, as it is written, and not judgment. Let us, then, bear fruit in Christ, so that we may deserve to be everlasting.

Explanation 36, chapter 20

36.20.1CSEL 64:86

Sustinentes enim dominum possidebunt terram, illam utique terram uiuentium. est quaedam terra caelestis, quae fructum caelestibus ferat, de qua ait: credo uidere bona domini in terra uiuentium. haec terra multo hominum sudore uentri ministrat alimenta, illa terra bona domini

"For those who wait for the Lord will possess the land," surely that land of the living. There is a kind of heavenly land, which bears fruit for heavenly beings, of which he says: "I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living." This land supplies food for the belly with much human sweat; that land, the good land of the Lord,

36.20.2CSEL 64:86–87

sine ullo labore fructificat, in qua iustorum diuturna possessio et piae mentis hereditas est. et bene ait: sustinentes autem dominum hereditate possidebunt terram. haec est enim terra quae non praeterit; nam caelum et terra praeteribunt, uerba autem domini non praeteribunt. et ideo nec illa intellegibilis terra poterit praeterire paradisi, in qua sunt qui domini uerba conseruant. in hac terra conlocatus est Adam, ut fructum aeternae caperet uitae; sed quia uerba domini seruare non potuit, ideo in possessione quam acceperat manere non meruit.

bears fruit without any labor; in it is the lasting possession of the just and the inheritance of the pious mind. And well he says: "But those who wait for the Lord will possess the land by inheritance." For this is the land that does not pass away; for "heaven and earth will pass away, but the words of the Lord will not pass away." And so neither will that intelligible land of paradise be able to pass away, in which are those who keep the words of the Lord. In this land Adam was placed, to take the fruit of eternal life; but because he could not keep the words of the Lord, he did not deserve to remain in the possession he had received.

36.20.3CSEL 64:87

qui autem uerba domini custodit, confidenter dicit: expectans expectaui dominum et respexit me. Adam autem quoniam non expectauit dominum — quomodo enim expectauit qui refugit et offerre se timuit? —, ideo nec dominus eum uidere dignatus est; oculi enim domini Super iustos. hunc autem eo usque uidere nolebat, ut quaereret dicens: Adam, ubi es? qui quaeritur, pro absente habetur. fides est, quae nos repraesentat deo, perfidia, quae facit impios exulare.

But he who keeps the words of the Lord confidently says: "Waiting, I waited for the Lord, and he looked upon me." But because Adam did not wait for the Lord (for how did he wait who fled and was afraid to present himself?), neither did the Lord deign to see him; for "the eyes of the Lord are upon the just." Him he was so unwilling to see that he asked, saying: "Adam, where are you?" He who is sought is counted as absent. It is faith that makes us present to God, faithlessness that makes the ungodly exiles.

36.20.4CSEL 64:87

nullus itaque est deo absens nisi qui se absentem fecerit, et ideo dicit: fiat tibi secundum fidem tuam; qui enim ignorat, ignorabitur. ergo Adam quasi peccator locum suum seruare non potuit; de paradiso eiectus in castellum est relegatus, ut ageret paenitentiam. accepit dilationem, ne continuo penitus interiret, ut salua fieret Eua per generationem filiorum, fidem sancti Abel, prophetarum gratiam, ecclesiae posteritatem.

So no one is absent to God except one who has made himself absent; and therefore he says: "Be it done to you according to your faith"; for "he who does not know will not be known." So Adam, as a sinner, could not keep his place; cast out of paradise, he was banished to a stronghold, to do penance. He received a delay, so as not to perish utterly at once, so that Eve might be saved through the bearing of children: the faith of holy Abel, the grace of the prophets, the posterity of the church.

Explanation 36, chapter 21

36.21.1CSEL 64:87

Sed qui per haec redimi noluerit et in peccato perseuerandum ducit, de eo dicit prophetia: et adhuc pusillum et non erit peccator et quaeres locum eius et non inuenies. quomodo enim esse poterit in futurum, cum peccati locus diuturnus esse non possit? haec est enim terra quae aperuit os suum, ut sanguinem susciperet innocentis, et ideo in hac terra locus est peccatorum.

But he who will not be redeemed through these things and thinks he should persist in sin, of him the prophecy says: "And yet a little while and the sinner will not be; and you will seek his place and will not find it." For how can he exist in the future, when the place of sin cannot be lasting? For this is the land that opened its mouth to receive the blood of the innocent, and so in this land is the place of sinners.

36.21.2CSEL 64:87–88

praeterit terra; quomodo peccatoris locus poterit inueniri? ego arbitror, quod ideo firmamentum inter aquam et aquam deus esse praeceperit, ut a uirtutibus peccata discerneret et superior aqua, quae laudat dominum, quieta maneret erroris, inferior peccato esset obnoxia. denique illa deum uidet, haec non uidet;

The earth passes away; how can the sinner's place be found? I think that God commanded the firmament to be between water and water for this reason: to separate sins from virtues, so that the upper water, which praises the Lord, might remain free of error, and the lower be liable to sin. Indeed that one sees God, this does not see him;

36.21.3CSEL 64:88

quae super caelos, uidet, quae in abysso, non uidet. unde etiam dictum est: uiderunt te aquae, deus, uiderunt te aquae et timuerunt, turbatae sunt abyssi; multitudo sonitus aquarum. merito turbantur abyssi, super quas tenebrae sunt deformes, et ideo pacem habere non possunt. unde rogauit legio daemoniorum, ut in abyssum mitteretur, et se cum magno tumultu praecipitauit in fluctus, ut porcorum gregem quem reppererat strangularet. peccatores itaque abyssum petunt, ubi caligo tenebrarum.

the water above the heavens sees, that in the abyss does not see. Hence it is also said: "The waters saw you, O God, the waters saw you and feared; the abysses were troubled; a multitude of the sound of waters." Rightly the abysses are troubled, over which is ugly darkness, and so they cannot have peace. Hence the legion of demons asked to be sent into the abyss, and threw itself into the waves with great tumult so as to drown the herd of swine it had found. Sinners, then, seek the abyss, where the gloom of darkness is.

Explanation 36, chapter 22

36.22.1CSEL 64:88

Mansueti autem possidebunt terram et delectabuntur in multitudine pacis. merito terram possident in quibus deus ipse requiescit, sicut diuino per Esaiam resultauit oraculo dicens: super quem requiescam nisi supra humilem et quietum et trementem uerba mea? qui sunt mansueti, nisi quos nullus

"But the gentle will possess the land and will delight in the multitude of peace." Rightly they possess the land in whom God himself rests, as he resounded through Isaiah in a divine oracle, saying: "On whom shall I rest but on the humble and quiet and him who trembles at my words?" Who are the gentle but those whom no

36.22.2CSEL 64:88–89

stimulus dissensionis exagitat, non ira perturbat, non saeuitia exasperat, non rabies crudelitatis inflammat? et ideo quia non uina, non epulas, non diuitias, sed pacem domini dilexerunt in corpore constituti, pro illa delectatione corporalium uoluptatum, qua se putarunt esse fraudandos, ut gratiam adipiscerentur aeternam, delectabuntur in multitudine pacis, quam dominus noster Iesus in diebus suis generi donauit humano, sicut prophetia, quae non mentita est, comprehendit asserens: orietur in diebus eius iustitia et multitudo pacis, donec extollatur luna. quae igitur est pax, qua cunctae ecclesiae multiplicatus est populus, nisi illa de qua dominus dixit: pacem meam relinquo uobis, pacem meam do uobis? dedit pacem, qui animorum bella sedauit.

goad of dissension stirs up, anger does not disturb, savagery does not exasperate, the madness of cruelty does not inflame? And so, because while placed in the body they loved not wines, not banquets, not riches, but the Lord's peace, in place of that delight of bodily pleasures of which they thought they would be deprived in order to gain eternal grace, they will delight in the multitude of peace, which our Lord Jesus gave to the human race in his days, as the prophecy, which did not lie, includes, asserting: "In his days justice will arise and a multitude of peace, until the moon is lifted up." What, then, is the peace by which the people of every church has been multiplied, but that of which the Lord said: "My peace I leave you, my peace I give you"? He gave peace who calmed the wars of souls.

Explanation 36, chapter 23

36.23.1CSEL 64:89

Sequitur: obseruabit peccator iustum et fremet super eum dentibus suis. dominus autem inridebit eum, quoniam prospicit quod ueniet dies eius. indignantis quidem et feruescentis in iracundia consuetudo est dentibus fremere, sed habet etiam cor maligni dentes suos, qui non resonare, sed lacerare consueuerunt. insidiae commenta nequitiae dentes sunt peccatoris.

There follows: "The sinner will watch the just man and gnash his teeth at him. But the Lord will laugh at him, for he foresees that his day will come." It is indeed the habit of one who is indignant and seething with anger to gnash with his teeth; but the heart of the malicious also has its teeth, which are wont not to make a noise but to tear. Plots, the devices of wickedness, are the sinner's teeth.

36.23.2CSEL 64:89

insidiatur ergo peccator iusto, quia inuidet; iusti enim uita redarguit peccatorem, quem tacita maiore auctoritate condemnat quam si clara uoce loqueretur. sed iustus timere non debet fremitum peccatoris, quia inprobitas non potest esse perpetua. insidiae temporales sunt, munimenta autem uirtutis aeterna. mors peccatoris omnem eius potentiam fraudemque dissoluit.

So the sinner lies in wait for the just man, because he envies him; for the just man's life refutes the sinner, and condemns him silently with greater authority than if it spoke with a clear voice. But the just man must not fear the sinner's gnashing, because wickedness cannot be perpetual. Plots are temporal, but the defenses of virtue eternal. The sinner's death dissolves all his power and fraud.

Explanation 36, chapter 24

36.24.1CSEL 64:89

Plus adicit: ecce, inquit, gladium euaginauerunt peccatores, extenderunt arcum suum, ut deiciant pauperem et inopem. quis est gladius peccatoris nisi contrarius gladio spiritus sancti? docuit hunc scriptura me gladium, docuit apostolus, dicens quia habemus loricam iustitiae et scutum fidei et galeam salutis et gladium spiritus quod est uerbum dei. ergo uerbum dei gladius spiritus sancti est; e contrario utique gladius nequissimi uerbum est malum.

He adds more: "Behold," he says, "sinners have drawn the sword, they have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy." What is the sinner's sword but the opposite of the sword of the Holy Spirit? Scripture has taught me this sword, the apostle has taught it, saying that we have "the breastplate of justice and the shield of faith and the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God." The word of God, then, is the sword of the Holy Spirit; on the contrary, the sword of the wicked one is an evil word.

36.24.2CSEL 64:89–90

hoc Petrus apostolus Ananiam et Saphiram sermonis sui quodam ense percussit, hoc gladio Paulus Elymo aduersanti disputationibus suis oculorum lumen eripuit et noctem caecitatis infudit. considera nunc mihi iurgantes peccatores atque acerba iactantes insolentiae et criminationum obprobria proferentes. nonne, si eos audias, dices: gladium euaginauerunt peccatores, quando sermo turpis tam-

With this the apostle Peter struck Ananias and Sapphira, as with a sword of his speech; with this sword Paul took away the light of the eyes from Elymas, who opposed his arguments, and poured in the night of blindness. Consider now, I pray, sinners quarrelling and hurling bitter insolence and bringing forth the reproaches of accusations. If you hear them, will you not say: "Sinners have drawn the sword," when shameful speech is brought out of a wanton mouth as if

36.24.3CSEL 64:90

quam de uagina petulanti ex ore profertur, quem cohiberi par fuit et recondi? similiter ut gladius uerbum dei dicitur, idem et sermo est peccatoris, ita et arcus quem extendunt peccatores mens eorum est et sagitta quam iaciunt sermo est uenenatus. sicut enim sagitta Christus qui est uerbum dei, cui dicitur: posui te sicut sagittam electam quae profertur ex pharetra dei, ita sagittae sunt perfidorum, quae arcu quodam iniquitatis emissae incautum

from a sheath, which ought to have been held back and put away? Just as the word of God is called a sword, and so too is the sinner's speech, so also the bow which sinners bend is their mind, and the arrow they shoot is poisoned speech. For as Christ, who is the Word of God, is an arrow, to whom it is said: "I have set you as a chosen arrow which is brought out of the quiver of God," so there are arrows of the faithless, which, shot from a kind of bow of iniquity, wound

36.24.4CSEL 64:90

uulnerant innocentem, nisi ignita eorum iacula scuto fidei repellantur, et ideo sollicitus esse debes miles in proelio, quia pugna tibi non solum aduersus carnem et sanguinem est, sed aduersus ipsas quoque nequitias spiritales quae non uidentur. abundent tibi arma fortia deo, ut facile possis quae uolueris tela depromere, ne pauperem te et inermem hostis possit opprimere. esto deo fortis, deo diues, ut dicatur de te:

the unwary innocent, unless their fiery darts are driven back by the shield of faith; and so you must be careful, soldier in battle, because your fight is not only against flesh and blood but also against the very spiritual forces of wickedness which are not seen. Let weapons mighty for God abound in you, so that you can easily draw out whatever darts you wish, lest the enemy be able to overpower you poor and unarmed. Be strong for God, rich for God, so that it may be said of you:

36.24.5CSEL 64:90

redemptio animae uiri diuitiae eius. abundato thesauro sapientiae, esto diues in uerbo et operibus bonis, ut possis esse munitus. fuge diuitias peccatoris, ne inueniat ubi uulnerare te possit. esto misericors, ut inuulnerabilis maneas uel curare te possis, si fueris uulneratus. est et pauper, quem uolunt aduersarii uulnerare, ex illo numero, de quo saluator dixit: beati pauperes spiritu, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum.

"The ransom of a man's soul is his riches." Abound in the treasure of wisdom, be rich in word and good works, so that you can be fortified. Flee the riches of the sinner, lest he find where he can wound you. Be merciful, so that you may remain unwounded or be able to heal yourself if you have been wounded. There is also a poor man whom the adversaries wish to wound, of that number of whom the Savior said: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

Explanation 36, chapter 25

36.25.1CSEL 64:90–91

Et ideo framea peccatorum intret, inquit, in cor ipsorum et arcus eorum confringantur, ut, quemadmodum reuertitur in dei seruulos ab eis qui non receperint benedicentium pacem, ita etiam malitia peccatorum, qua iusto nocere conantur, in eorum perniciem reuertatur, quo suis telis et uulneribus trucidentur; saepe enim iacula in ipsos qui ea iecerint refunduntur.

And so, he says, "let the sword of sinners enter into their own heart and let their bows be broken," so that, just as the peace of those who bless returns upon the servants of God from those who did not receive it, so too the malice of sinners, with which they try to harm the just man, may return to their own ruin, so that they are slaughtered by their own darts and wounds; for often darts are thrown back on those who threw them.

36.25.2CSEL 64:91

quod etiam proximo accidit bello, cum infideles et sacrilegi lacesserent aliquem in domino confidentem et regnum eius ereptum ire contenderent, ecclesiis domini persecutionum saeua minitantes, ut subito uentus oreretur, qui infidelibus excuteret scuta de manibus ac tela omnium atque missilia in peccatoris exercitum retorqueret.

This happened too in the recent war, when the faithless and sacrilegious were attacking a man who trusted in the Lord and were striving to snatch his kingdom from him, threatening the churches of the Lord with savage persecutions: suddenly a wind arose, which struck the shields from the hands of the faithless and turned the darts and missiles of all back upon the army of the sinner.

36.25.3CSEL 64:91

adhuc hostis deerat et iam illi uentorum proelia ferre non poterant suisque spiculis sternebantur et, quod peius est, non erant corporum grauiora uulnera illa quam mentium; deficiebant enim corde, cum deum aduersum se pugnare cognoscerent. exierant itaque prouocantes et de pharetra cordis sui aduersus populum christianum uenenata perfidiae iacula proferebant, sed in caput eorum sua reuertebatur impietas.

The enemy was not yet at hand, and already they could not bear the battles of the winds and were laid low by their own javelins; and, what is worse, those wounds of the body were not graver than those of the mind; for they lost heart when they realized that God was fighting against them. They had gone out, then, provoking, and from the quiver of their heart were bringing out against the Christian people the poisoned darts of faithlessness; but their ungodliness returned on their own head.

36.25.4CSEL 64:91

denique ipsi inter se sua perfidia sunt soluti paratasque fidelibus insidias dominus dissipauit, ut non solum piis nocere non possent, sed propriis auxiliis nudarentur atque ad hostem sua arma transirent. quanto melius non protulissent gladium de uagina, hoc est impia nequaquam uerba prompsissent! nam si pro otioso sermone redditurus est unusquisque rationem, quanto magis uerba sacrilegii grauibus suppliciis expiabit!

In the end they were broken up among themselves by their own faithlessness, and the Lord scattered the plots prepared for the faithful, so that not only could they not harm the pious but they were stripped of their own auxiliaries and their weapons passed over to the enemy. How much better had they not drawn the sword from the sheath, that is, had never uttered ungodly words! For if each will render an account for an idle word, how much more will he expiate words of sacrilege with grave punishments!

Explanation 36, chapter 26

36.26.1CSEL 64:91–92

Igne nos examinasti, dicit Dauid. ergo omnes igne examinabimur. et Ezechiel dicit: ecce uenit dominus omnipotens. et quis sustinebit diem introitus eius? aut quis sustinebit cum apparuerit nobis? quoniam ipse introibit sicut ignis conflatorii et sicut alueus lauantium. et sedebit conflans et purgans sicut aurum et argentum et purgabit filios Leui et effundet eos sicut aurum et sicut argentum, et

"You have tried us by fire," David says. All of us, then, will be tried by fire. And Ezekiel says: "Behold, the Lord Almighty comes. And who will endure the day of his entrance? Or who will endure when he appears to us? For he will enter like the fire of a furnace and like the lye of the washers. And he will sit smelting and purifying like gold and silver, and he will purify the sons of Levi and pour them out like gold and like silver, and

36.26.2CSEL 64:92

erunt domino offerentes sacrificium in aequitate. igne ergo purgabuntur filii Leui, igne Ezechiel, igne Daniel. sed hi etsi per ignem examinabuntur, dicent tamen: transiuimus per ignem et aquam. alii in igne remanebunt. illis rorabit ignis ut Hebraeis pueris, qui incendio fornacis ardentis obiecti sunt, ministros autem impietatis ultor ignis exuret.

they will be offering sacrifice to the Lord in equity." The sons of Levi, then, will be purified by fire, Ezekiel by fire, Daniel by fire. But these, though they will be tried by fire, will yet say: "We passed through fire and water." Others will remain in the fire. For the former the fire will be as dew, as for the Hebrew youths who were thrown into the blaze of the burning furnace; but the avenging fire will burn up the ministers of ungodliness.

36.26.3CSEL 64:92

uae mihi, si opus meum arserit laboris huius patiar detrimentum etsi saluos faciet dominus seruos suos, salui erimus per fidem, sic tamen salui quasi per ignem; etsi non exuremur, tamen uremur. quomodo tamen alii remaneant in igne, alii pertranseant, alio loco nos doceat scriptura diuina. nempe in Mare Rubrum demersus populus est Aegyptiorum, transiuit autem populus Hebraeorum;

Woe to me, if my work burns: I shall suffer the loss of this labor; even if the Lord saves his servants, we shall be saved by faith, yet saved as through fire; even if we are not burned up, yet we shall be burned. How, though, some remain in the fire and others pass through, let divine Scripture teach us in another place. The people of the Egyptians was sunk in the Red Sea, but the people of the Hebrews passed through;

36.26.4CSEL 64:92

Moyses pertransiuit, praecipitatus est Pharao, quoniam grauia eum peccata merserunt. eo modo praecipitabuntur sacrilegi in lacum ignis ardentis, qui superba in deum iactauere conuicia. sequamur ergo hic positi columnam ignis, quae nos in hoc corpore positos inluminet et uiam monstret, ut in futurum nobis nebula refrigeret noctis, quo saeua incendia releuare possimus.

Moses passed through, Pharaoh was cast down, because grave sins sank him. In the same way the sacrilegious will be cast down into the lake of burning fire, who have flung proud insults at God. While placed here, then, let us follow the pillar of fire, which may enlighten us while we are in this body and show us the way, so that in the future the cloud may cool us by night, by which we may be able to relieve the fierce burnings.

Explanation 36, chapter 27

36.27.1CSEL 64:92–93

Uide autem, scriptura quid dicat: arcus, inquit, peccatorum dominus confringat. arcum autem suum posuit in nube, quando diluuia cesserant, ut tranquillitas refunderetur. unde credendum, quia aduersarius et malignus arcum extendit suum, ut quietis animis moueat tempestates, excitet flatus. oremus ergo, ut arcum malignitatis dissoluat dominus deus noster, assit pauperi suo et inopi, qui propter dei timorem nescit affectandas esse diuitias, occupanda minorum praedia, uiduas relictis maiorum hereditatibus exuendas.

But see what Scripture says: "Let the Lord break the bows of sinners." But he set his own bow in the cloud when the floods had ceased, so that calm might be restored. Hence we must believe that the adversary and wicked one bends his bow to stir storms in quiet souls and raise blasts of wind. Let us pray, then, that the Lord our God may break the bow of malice and stand by his poor and needy one, who, for fear of God, does not know that riches are to be grasped, the estates of lesser men seized, widows stripped of the inheritances left by their elders.

Explanation 36, chapter 28

36.28.1CSEL 64:93

Melius est parum iusto super diuitias peccatorum multas. non ergo diuitiae accusantur, sed diuitiae peccatorum, nisi forte quia peccator dixit: omnia haec mihi tradita sunt et cui uolo do illa, deinde quoniam diuitiae magis facem cupiditatis inflammant et unusquisque, dum maiora desiderat, non declinat diuerticula peccatorum.

"Better is a little to the just than the many riches of sinners." It is not riches, then, that are accused, but the riches of sinners; unless perhaps because the sinner said: "All these things have been handed over to me, and I give them to whom I will"; and then because riches rather inflame the torch of desire, and each one, while he desires more, does not turn aside from the byways of sins.

36.28.2CSEL 64:93

unde et saluator dixit: facite uobis amicos de mamona iniquitatis. iniquitatis enim census est, qui in diaboli potestate est, ut cui ille uoluerit conferatur. potest et illud intellegi, quia melius est parum iusto super diuitias peccatorum multas, quia est quidam diues in uerbis, ut sunt philosophi istius mundi de sacrilegiis disputantes, de motu siderum, de stella Iouis ac Saturni, de generationibus hominum, de simulacrorum cultu, de geometria et dialectica. philosophi ergo in sermone diuites sunt, fidei inopes, ueritatis exsortes.

Hence the Savior too said: "Make friends for yourselves of the mammon of iniquity." For that wealth is of iniquity which is in the devil's power, to be conferred on whom he wishes. It can also be understood that "better is a little to the just than the many riches of sinners," because there is a kind of man rich in words, like the philosophers of this world disputing about sacrileges, about the motion of the stars, about the star of Jupiter and of Saturn, about the generations of men, about the worship of images, about geometry and dialectic. Philosophers, then, are rich in speech, poor in faith, without share in the truth.

36.28.3CSEL 64:93–94

et sunt plerique simplices domini sacerdotes, in sermone pauperes, abstinentia et uirtute sublimes. illi multis locuntur perfidiam, isti paucis fidem asserunt; illi suos amittunt cotidie sacerdotes, hic pauper populos adquirit ecclesiae numeroque credentium. qui ergo hos audierit et uiderit operum qualitatem, dicet: melius est modicum iusto super diuitias

And there are many simple priests of the Lord, poor in speech, sublime in abstinence and virtue. Those speak faithlessness to many, these assert the faith in few words; those daily lose their own priests, this poor man gains peoples for the church and for the number of believers. He who hears these and sees the quality of their works will say: "Better is a little to the just than the many riches

36.28.4CSEL 64:94

peccatorum multas. hinc Salomon deriuauit illud, quod quasi suum ipse posuit: ex multiloquio non effugies peccatum. dialectica ergo diuitias uerborum fluit, pietas timorem dei seruat. ideo hic parcus in uerbis, diues in spiritu magis uult timere quam uana ueri uerba iactare. timor enim disciplina sapientiae est, loquacitas innocentiae uirtutisque naufragium atque incentiuum prolapsionis et culpae.

of sinners." From here Solomon drew what he set down as though his own: "In much speaking you will not escape sin." Dialectic, then, flows with riches of words; piety keeps the fear of God. So this man, sparing in words, rich in spirit, prefers to fear rather than toss about vain words of truth. For fear is the discipline of wisdom; talkativeness is the shipwreck of innocence and virtue and an incentive to falling and guilt.

Explanation 36, chapter 29

36.29.1CSEL 64:94

Quoniam brachia, inquit, peccatorum conterentur, ut actus eorum iusto impedimentum afferre non possint, ne derelinquatur uirga peccatorum super sortem iustorum. et Paulus ait: conterat deus satanan sub pedibus uestris. si enim brachium eius contritum fuerit, totus ipse conteretur, ut conculcentur eius commenta sicut uenena serpentis.

"For the arms of sinners," he says, "will be broken," so that their actions cannot hinder the just man, "lest the rod of sinners be left upon the lot of the just." And Paul says: "May God crush Satan under your feet." For if his arm is broken, he himself will be wholly crushed, so that his devices may be trodden down like the venom of a serpent.

Explanation 36, chapter 30

36.30.1CSEL 64:94

Confirmat autem iustos dominus brachio aduersarii dissoluto, et ideo iustus dicit: et confirmasti super manum tuam, et Iob ait: manus domini tetigit me. misit ergo dominus manum suam in seruum suum et manum peccatoris, quam in eum accepta miserat potestate, brachiumque contriuit. ita diabolus suo sermone deceptus est, qui dixit: mitte manum tuam in eum et uideamus, si in faciem te non benedicit;

"But the Lord strengthens the just," when the adversary's arm is broken; and so the just man says: "And you have strengthened your hand upon me," and Job says: "The hand of the Lord has touched me." The Lord, then, put his hand on his servant and broke the hand of the sinner, which he had put on him with the power he had received, and broke his arm. So the devil was deceived by his own word, who said: "Put your hand on him and let us see whether he will not bless you to your face";

36.30.2CSEL 64:94–95

non enim ausus est dicere maledicit, sed hoc intellegendum reliquit. misit dominus manum suam et confirmatus est Iob, coepit benedicere qui maledicere credebatur; sanat enim iustos cum tangit manus diuina, non uulnerat. misit manum suam et leprosi macula omnis abscessit, tetigit caecorum oculos et caecitate depulsa lumen refulsit oculorum. pete ergo semper ut confirmeris, quoniam et tu qui stas uide ne cadas. nos stare debemus, ut confirmemur a domino. lubricum est saeculum, cito labimur; ideo rogemus, ut nos dominus stabilire et confirmare dignetur.

for he did not dare to say "curses," but left it to be understood. The Lord put out his hand and Job was strengthened; he who was thought to curse began to bless; for the divine hand heals the just when it touches them, it does not wound. He put out his hand and every spot of the leper departed; he touched the eyes of the blind and, the blindness driven away, the light of the eyes shone again. Ask always, then, to be strengthened, since "you too who stand, see that you do not fall." We must stand so as to be strengthened by the Lord. The world is slippery, we soon fall; so let us ask that the Lord may deign to make us stable and strong.

Explanation 36, chapter 31

36.31.1CSEL 64:95

Noli putare, quia uiam tuum nesciat dominus; si iustus es, nouit. crede dicenti prophetae: nouit dominus uias inmaculatorum et hereditas eorum inmaculata erit; non confundentur in tempore malo. qui nouit Christum, scitur a domino; nouit iustos, nescit iniustos. ideo iniustis dicet: discedite a me omnes qui operamini iniquitatem; nescio uos, hoc est: quia estis indigni cognitione diuina; nescio uos, quia me ipsi nescire uoluistis. opera uestra me nesciunt, facta uestra me nesciunt; etsi dicatis, quia scitis me, redarguunt uos uestra peccata.

Do not think that the Lord does not know your way; if you are just, he knows it. Believe the prophet who says: "The Lord knows the ways of the spotless, and their inheritance will be spotless; they will not be confounded in the evil time." He who knows Christ is known by the Lord; he knows the just, he does not know the unjust. So he will say to the unjust: "Depart from me, all you who work iniquity; I do not know you," that is: because you are unworthy of divine knowledge; I do not know you, because you yourselves chose not to know me. Your works do not know me, your deeds do not know me; even if you say that you know me, your sins refute you.

36.31.2CSEL 64:95

omne peccatum a malo est, qui autem non peccat, in me manet; hoc scripsit Iohannes. quid de domino dicam, quia dedignatur impium scire? Paulus dedignatur, qui dixit: si quis in uobis propheta est aut spiritalis, cognoscat quae scribo uobis; qui autem ignorat, ignorabitur, et alibi ita dictum est: cognouit dominus qui sunt eius. simus ergo domini, ut cognoscat nos dominus, et discedat ab iniquitate omnis qui nominat nomen domini.

"Every sin is from the evil one, but he who does not sin abides in me": this John wrote. Why should I speak of the Lord, that he disdains to know the ungodly? Paul disdains it, who said: "If anyone among you is a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge what I write to you; but he who does not know will not be known"; and elsewhere it is said thus: "The Lord knows those who are his." Let us, then, be the Lord's, so that the Lord may know us, "and let everyone who names the name of the Lord depart from iniquity."

Explanation 36, chapter 32

36.32.1CSEL 64:95–96

Graecus habet: nouit dominus dies inmaculatorum; sunt enim dies Heliae, sunt dies Nabuchodonosor. ideo euangelium habet: in diebus Heliae, quando clausum est caelum. nox erat perfidis, sed Heliae lumen erat; clausum erat perfidis caelum, sed Heliae patebat; fames erat perfidis, sed Heliae ubertas. neque enim esurire poterat cui cibum caelestia ministrabant nec esuriebat qui alios ipse pascebat. ergo sibi dies est iustus in tenebris, quia et lux in tenebris lucet. et Ioseph in Aegypto erat et lucebat ei meridies, sicut supra dixit.

The Greek has: "The Lord knows the days of the spotless"; for there are days of Elijah, there are days of Nebuchadnezzar. So the gospel has: "in the days of Elijah, when heaven was shut." It was night for the faithless, but there was light for Elijah; heaven was shut for the faithless, but open for Elijah; there was famine for the faithless, but plenty for Elijah. For he who was fed with food by heavenly things could not hunger, nor did he hunger who himself fed others. So the just man is day to himself in darkness, because "the light also shines in darkness." Joseph too was in Egypt and noon shone for him, as he said above.

36.32.2CSEL 64:96

peccatori autem dixit deus: quare tu enarras iustitias me? iustitia lumen est, quia supra habet: et educet sicut lumen iustitiam tuam. habes ergo quod in te luceat, si iustitiam sequaris. splendet tibi dies, lucet tibi nox, quia fideli et nox tamquam dies inluminabitur. dies igitur iusti nouit dominus, quia ipse inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, hoc est: illum qui ad imaginem et similitudinem dei uiuit, illum qui se hominem eius cognoscit, ut refugiat equorum libidinem adhinnientem, ferarum rabiem, lepusculorum formidinem, uulpium fraudem, rapinam luporum, illum

But to the sinner God said: "Why do you recount my justices?" Justice is light, for above he has: "And he will bring forth your justice like light." You have, then, what may shine in you, if you follow justice. The day shines for you, the night gives you light, because for the faithful even night will be lit up like day. The Lord, then, knows the days of the just man, because he himself enlightens every man coming into this world, that is, him who lives after the image and likeness of God, him who knows himself as God's man, so as to flee the neighing lust of horses, the fury of wild beasts, the timidity of hares, the fraud of foxes, the rapine of wolves; that

36.32.3CSEL 64:96

hominem qui sic agit, quasi in hunc mundum superuenerit, qui non ex sanguine neque ex uoluntate carnis, sed ex deo natus sit. uenisti ergo; noli remanere, noli haerere terrenis. ut scias autem, quia dies boni sunt, audi dicentem: Abraham diem meum uidit et gauisus est. bonum habet diem qui dei filium bonum deum nouit et dominum confitetur. et rursus ipse nos ammonet cauere debere, quia dies mali sunt. qui mali sunt dies? in quibus utique malum cognoscitur, quod est a malo.

man who acts as though he had come into this world as a newcomer, who is born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh but of God. You have come, then; do not stay, do not cling to earthly things. And so that you may know that there are good days, hear one saying: "Abraham saw my day and rejoiced." He has a good day who knows the Son of God as good God and confesses him as Lord. And again he himself warns us that we must beware, because "the days are evil." What days are evil? Those in which evil is known, which is from the evil one.

36.32.4CSEL 64:96–97

aut forte dies saeculi mali sunt, quia saeculum in maligno positum est. sed legimus etiam post saeculum diem malum: in die mala liberabit eum dominus, hoc est: in die iudicii propter multorum supplicia. necesse est enim ut torqueantur iniusti, conpatiantur iusti, quia et angeli gaudent, cum peccator a morte seruatur unus. conpatiuntur igitur cum punitur, etsi alibi legerimus: laetabitur iustus, cum uiderit uindictam impiorum, quod suo loco reseruo, etsi frequenter audieris cur laetetur; sed occupationes occupationibus non inseramus.

Or perhaps the days of the world are evil, because the world lies in the evil one. But we read of an evil day after the world too: "In the evil day the Lord will deliver him," that is, on the day of judgment because of the punishments of many. For the unjust must be tormented and the just must suffer with them, since the angels too rejoice when one sinner is saved from death. They suffer with him, then, when he is punished, even though we have read elsewhere: "The just will rejoice when he sees the vengeance on the ungodly"; this I reserve for its place, though you have often heard why he rejoices; but let us not insert one occupation into another.

Explanation 36, chapter 33

36.33.1CSEL 64:97

Nouit dominus dies inmaculatorum, quia inmaculatae innocentiae gratia eius et plenitudo miseretur, non miseretur errantibus. isti non habent diem, quia lucem fugiunt; de quibus pulchre dictum est: dies eorum sicut umbra praetereunt. cognitio ergo dei dignationis est, non uisionis. oculi eius lux sunt, quos aspicit illuminat; et ideo oculi eius dies iustorum sunt.

"The Lord knows the days of the spotless," because his grace and fullness have mercy on spotless innocence; he does not have mercy on those who go astray. These have no day, because they flee the light; of them it is finely said: "Their days pass like a shadow." The knowledge of God, then, is one of favor, not of sight. His eyes are light; those he looks upon he enlightens; and so his eyes are the day of the just.

Explanation 36, chapter 34

36.34.1CSEL 64:97

Unde et hereditas eorum in aeternum erit, quia aeterna bona, non temporalis hereditatis compendia quaesiuerunt, et non habebunt de quo erubescant in tempore malo, id est iudicii caelestis, et in diebus famis saturabuntur, quia non in pane solo uiuit homo, sed in omni uerbo dei. sed quis homo? scio hominem in Christo ante annos quattuordecim —siue in corpore nescio, siue extra corpus nescio, deus scit - raptum eiusmodi usque ad tertium caelum.

Hence also "their inheritance will be for ever," because they sought eternal goods, not the gains of a temporal inheritance, "and they will have nothing to blush for in the evil time," that is, of the heavenly judgment, "and in the days of famine they will be satisfied," because "man does not live by bread alone, but by every word of God." But what man? "I know a man in Christ fourteen years ago (whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows), caught up as such to the third heaven."

36.34.2CSEL 64:97–98

ille ergo homo qui in Christo est, qui se in carne esse non nouit, qui non in carne ambulat, sed in spiritu, ille qui rapitur non solum ad caelum, sed etiam ad tertium caelum et rapitur ad paradisum et audit uerba quae non licet homini loqui, qui non in uirtutibus suis, sed in infirmitatibus gloriatur, ipse non in solo pane, sed in omni uerbo dei uiuit. uerbum enim dei uita est, quia uerbum caro factum est. unde praeclare dixit euangelista: quod factum est in ipso uita est.

That man, then, who is in Christ, who does not know that he is in the flesh, who walks not in the flesh but in the spirit, who is caught up not only to heaven but to the third heaven, and is caught up to paradise and hears words which it is not lawful for a man to speak, who glories not in his powers but in his weaknesses: he lives not by bread alone but by every word of God. For the Word of God is life, because the Word was made flesh. Hence the evangelist excellently said: "What was made in him is life."

Explanation 36, chapter 35

36.35.1CSEL 64:98

Alexandrini quidem et Aegyptii legunt: omnia per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil quod factum est et interposita distinctione subiciunt: in ipso uita est. salua sit fidelibus illa distinctio; ego non uereor legere: quod factum est in ipso uita

The Alexandrians, indeed, and the Egyptians read: "All things were made through him, and without him was made nothing that was made," and, placing a stop in between, add: "In him is life." Let that punctuation be kept safe for the faithful; I am not afraid to read: "What was made in him is life,"

36.35.2CSEL 64:98

est et nihil habet quod teneat Arrianus, quia non illius uenena considero, sed lectionis sacrae consuetudinem recognosco. non enim dixit factum est uerbum ante omne principium, non dixit factum est uerbum, sed si, quod dixerit, audire desideras: uerbum, inquit, erat apud deum. erat apud deum quod cum ipso operabatur, cum ipso dominabatur. non dixit factum est uerbum, sed dixit: deus erat uerbum.

and the Arian has nothing to hold on to, for I do not consider his poisons but recognize the custom of reading sacred Scripture. For he did not say "the Word was made before every beginning"; he did not say "the Word was made"; but if you want to hear what he said: "The Word," he says, "was with God." He was with God who worked with him, who ruled with him. He did not say "the Word was made," but said: "The Word was God."

36.35.3CSEL 64:98

deus autem non factura, sed factor est et creator. aperi aures et audi: omnia per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil discis esse filium, in quo diuinitatis est plenitudo. aperi aures adhuc paululum et audi dicentem: quod factum est in ipso uita est.

And God is not a thing made, but the maker and creator. Open your ears and hear: "All things were made through him, and without him was made nothing": you learn that he is the Son, in whom is the fullness of the Godhead. Open your ears a little more and hear him saying: "What was made in him is life."

36.35.4CSEL 64:98–99

in ipso, inquit, factum est, non dei uerbum factum est. aut si hoc mouet te ad calumniam, quia dixit in ipso factum est, numquid et deo patri calumniaris, quia dei filius dixit: qui autem facit ueritatem uenit ad lucem, ut manifestentur opera eius, quia in deo sunt facta, aut quia Dauid dixit: confitebor tibi, domine, quoniam exaudisti me et factus es mihi in salutem, hoc est: conuersus es mihi in salutem, operatus es ad salutem? possem aliis uti, sed nolo mihi credas, ne putes argumenta esse ingenii, non testimonia ueritatis.

"In him," he says, "was made," not "the Word of God was made." Or if this moves you to cavil, because he said "was made in him," do you cavil against God the Father too, because the Son of God said: "But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be made manifest, because they have been done in God," or because David said: "I will confess to you, O Lord, for you have heard me and have become my salvation," that is: you have turned to me for salvation, you have worked for my salvation? I could use other passages, but I do not want you to believe me, lest you think them arguments of ingenuity, not testimonies of truth.

Explanation 36, chapter 36

36.36.1CSEL 64:99

Ipse tonitrui filius, ipse qui in Christi pectore recumbebat, ipse cui secreta sua dominus non tacebat, cui Petrus innuit ut dominum interrogaret et ille interrogauit et dominus reuelauit, ipse exponat quid senserit de eo quod ait: quod factum est in ipso uita est. audi ergo interpretantem, quia tuas, Arriane, calumnias iam cauebat: quod erat ab initio et quod audiuimus et uidimus oculis nostris, quod perspeximus et manus nostrae scrutatae sunt de uerbo uitae, et uita apparuit.

Let the son of thunder himself, he who reclined on Christ's breast, he from whom the Lord did not keep his secrets, to whom Peter nodded to ask the Lord, and he asked and the Lord revealed it, let him explain what he meant by saying: "What was made in him is life." Hear him interpreting, then, for he was already guarding against your cavils, Arian: "What was from the beginning, and what we have heard and seen with our eyes, what we have looked upon and our hands have examined, concerning the Word of life; and the life appeared."

36.36.2CSEL 64:99

caro ergo est quae in Christo apparuit uel Christus in carne; ipse nostra in omnibus uita est. ipsius diuinitas uita est, ipsius aeternitas uita est, ipsius caro uita est, ipsius passio uita est. unde et Hieremias ait: in umbra eius uiuemus. umbra alarum umbra crucis, umbra est passionis. ipsius mors uita est, ipsius uulnus uita est, ipsius sanguis est uita, ipsius sepultura est uita, ipsius resurrectio uita est uniuersorum.

It is the flesh, then, that appeared in Christ, or Christ in the flesh; he is our life in all things. His Godhead is life, his eternity is life, his flesh is life, his passion is life. Hence Jeremiah too says: "In his shadow we shall live." The shadow of the wings is the shadow of the cross, the shadow of the passion. His death is life, his wound is life, his blood is life, his burial is life, his resurrection is the life of all.

36.36.3CSEL 64:99

uis scire quam mors ipsius uita sit? in morte ipsius baptizati sumus, ut cum ipso in nouitate uitae ambulemus. et ipse ait: amen amen dico uobis, nisi granum tritici cadens in terram moriatur, ipsum solum manet; si autem mortuum fuerit, multum fructum affert. ipse granum pro nobis corpore solutus et mortuus est, ut fructum multum afferret in nobis. mors itaque eius fructus est uitae. quod factum est ergo in ipso, uita est.

Do you want to know how his death is life? We have been baptized into his death, so that we may walk with him in newness of life. And he himself says: "Amen, amen I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit." He himself, the grain, was loosed in body and died for us, so as to bear much fruit in us. His death, then, is the fruit of life. What was made in him, then, is life.

36.36.4CSEL 64:99–100

caro facta est in ipso, uita est; infantia facta est in ipso, uita est; iudicium factum est in ipso, uita est; mors facta est in ipso, uita est; remissio peccatorum facta est in ipso, uita est; uulnus factum est in ipso, uita est; inlusio facta est in ipso, uita est; diuisio facta est in ipso, uita est; sepultura facta est in ipso, uita est; resurrectio facta est in ipso, uita est. uide quanta in ipso facta sunt, quibus uitae nostrae facta conuersio est, ut quae perierat redderetur.

Flesh was made in him: it is life; infancy was made in him: it is life; judgment was made in him: it is life; death was made in him: it is life; forgiveness of sins was made in him: it is life; a wound was made in him: it is life; mockery was made in him: it is life; division was made in him: it is life; burial was made in him: it is life; resurrection was made in him: it is life. See how many things were made in him, by which the conversion of our life was made, so that the life which had perished might be restored.

36.36.5CSEL 64:100

ad postremum uenditio facta est in ipso, uita est; redemptio facta est in ipso, uita est. ad mortem uenditus est a Iuda, emptus a Iudaeis ad mortem, ut pretioso eius sanguine nos redimeremur ad uitam. haec est uita quae facta est, haec est uita quae apparuit, haec est uita quam uidimus, haec est uita quae erat apud patrem, quia ipse, qui erat in principio, ipse est natus ex uirgine, ut esset uita morituris.

Lastly, sale was made in him: it is life; redemption was made in him: it is life. He was sold to death by Judas, bought to death by the Jews, so that by his precious blood we might be redeemed to life. This is the life that was made, this is the life that appeared, this is the life we have seen, this is the life that was with the Father; because he who was in the beginning, he himself was born of the virgin, to be life for the dying.

Explanation 36, chapter 37

36.37.1CSEL 64:100

Ipsum hunc propositum nobis locum interrogemus. quid est: hominem in Christo? hoc est factum in Christo, in quo facta sunt omnia, siue sedes siue dominationes siue principatus siue potestates, omnia per ipsum et in ipso creata sunt, et ipse est ante

Let us question this very passage set before us. What is "a man in Christ"? That is, made in Christ, in whom all things were made, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers; all things were created through him and in him, and he is before

36.37.2CSEL 64:100

omnes et omnia in ipso constant, hoc est in uirtute eius. homo ergo in Christo, qui factus est ad imaginem eius et similitudinem, homo in Christo, qui totus in Christo sit. sicut enim deus per unitatem et plenitudinem diuinitatis pater deus totus in filio est et filius in patre, ita per intentionem et pietatis affectum, ut exempli uice, non comparationis utamur, homo totus in Christo est; qui enim adhaeret domino unus spiritus est.

all and all things hold together in him, that is, in his power. A man in Christ, then, is one made after his image and likeness; a man in Christ, one who is wholly in Christ. For just as God the Father, through the unity and fullness of the Godhead, is wholly in the Son and the Son in the Father, so, by intention and the affection of piety (to use it as an example, not a comparison), man is wholly in Christ; for "he who clings to the Lord is one spirit."

36.37.3CSEL 64:100

homo ergo in Christo non ille terrenus, non ille peccati, sed homo Christi. quid ergo mouet quod factum est in ipso uita est, si et homo praecipue interior in ipso factus est, in ipso crucifixus, in ipso renouatus, in ipso sepultus et cum ipso consepultus, in ipso resuscitatus? quid mouet, ut dixi, quia scriptum est: quod factum est in ipso uita est, cum homo dixerit:

The man in Christ, then, is not that earthly man, not the man of sin, but Christ's man. Why, then, should "what was made in him is life" trouble you, if the man too, especially the inner man, was made in him, crucified in him, renewed in him, buried in him and buried with him, raised again in him? Why should it trouble you, as I said, that it is written: "What was made in him is life," when a man has said:

36.37.4CSEL 64:100–101

in deo faciemus uirtutem? si quaeris quae uita sit, moueat quod factum sit in ipso, accipe: nempe uita ecclesia est. in ipso facta est, in eius costa, in ipso resuscitata Eua. Eua autem uita, hoc est: quod factum est, quia Eua quae perierat salua facta est per ecclesiam, hoc est: per filiorum suorum generationem, sicut scriptum est, quia delictum superioris sobria emendauit hereditas. unde et ipse Paulus raptus est ad uitam, qui ante erat persecutor ad mortem.

"In God we shall do valiantly"? If you ask what life it is, let it move you what was made in him; take it: surely the life is the church. In him she was made, in his rib; in him Eve was raised again. And Eve is life, that is, what was made, because Eve who had perished was saved through the church, that is, through the bearing of her children, as it is written, because sober posterity amended the offense of the earlier. Hence Paul himself too was caught up to life, who before was a persecutor unto death.

Explanation 36, chapter 38

36.38.1CSEL 64:101

Prolixius euagati sumus, ut de eo homine, qui non in solo pane, sed in omni uerbo dei uiueret, diceremus. reuertamur ad psalmum: et ideo inmaculati non confundentur in die iudicii et in diebus famis saturabuntur.

We have strayed rather far, in order to speak of that man who lives not by bread alone but by every word of God. Let us return to the psalm: and so the spotless will not be confounded in the day of judgment, "and in the days of famine they will be satisfied."

Explanation 36, chapter 39

36.39.1CSEL 64:101

Deficientes sicut fumus deficient. Graecus ἐξέλιπον habet, hoc est defecerunt. uides subito aliquem ad potestatis uenisse et honoris insignia; sublimem iudicas. uides illi esse successum; nonne dicis de eo: ubi honoratus et exaltatus est iste? defecit. ideo plus dixit Graecus, quia, ubi honorari et exaltari quis creditur, ibi defectu proprio praeuenitur, ut meatus fluminum praeterisse citius quam uenisse comprehendas et, dum uentura opperiris fluenta, te adhuc expectante fluxerunt. contra humiles atque mansueti dum subiciuntur a diuitibus et opprimuntur, exaltati sunt a sua humilitate et subito refulserunt. ideoque Paulus in infirmitatibus sibi complacuit, non in uirtutibus.

"Failing, they will fail like smoke." The Greek has ἐξέλιπον, that is, "they failed." You see someone suddenly come to power and the insignia of honor; you judge him lofty. You see he has success; do you not say of him: "Where is this man who was honored and exalted?" He has failed. So the Greek said more, because where someone is thought to be honored and exalted, there he is overtaken by his own failing, so that you realize the flowing of rivers has passed sooner than it came, and while you wait for the streams to come, they have flowed past while you were still waiting. On the other hand, the humble and gentle, while they are put under and oppressed by the rich, are exalted from their humility and suddenly shine. And so Paul was well pleased in weaknesses, not in powers.

Explanation 36, chapter 40

36.40.1CSEL 64:101–102

Sed consideremus, ne quis putet eum in reuelationibus gloriatum, et repetamus ea, ut se ipse defendat humilitatis magistrum: scio, inquit, hominem in Christo ante annos quattuordecim —siue in corpore nescio, siue extra corpus nescio, deus scit-, raptum eiusmodi usque ad tertium caelum. ante annos quattuordecim reuelatum sibi dicit et tamen reuelationem tamdiu tenuit et repressit, nec dixisset, nisi utile nobis iudicasset ut diceret, ne nos reuelationibus extolleremur.

But let us take care that no one thinks he gloried in revelations, and let us repeat the words, so that he himself may defend himself as a teacher of humility: "I know," he says, "a man in Christ fourteen years ago (whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows), caught up as such to the third heaven." He says it was revealed to him fourteen years before, and yet he kept the revelation so long and held it back, and would not have spoken had he not judged it useful to us to speak, lest we be puffed up by revelations.

36.40.2CSEL 64:102

si enim in tanta gratia non est gloriatus Paulus, nec nos gloriari oportet. iuuenis ipse non gloriatus est: senex gloriaretur? deinde raptum se usque ad tertium caelum negare non potuit et tamen, utrum in corpore an extra corpus raptus esset, se ignorare testatus est. non ergo de scientia, sed de ignorantia, gloriatur et dei circa se gratiam praedicat. quod scientiae est negat, quod caritatis est confitetur; scientia enim inflat, caritas uero aedificat. et iterum raptum eiusmodi hominem dixit;

For if Paul did not glory in so great a grace, neither should we glory. He did not glory when young: would he glory when old? Then, he could not deny that he was caught up to the third heaven, and yet he testified that he did not know whether he was caught up in the body or out of the body. He glories, then, not in knowledge but in ignorance, and proclaims God's grace toward himself. What belongs to knowledge he denies, what belongs to love he confesses; for "knowledge puffs up, but love builds up." And again he said such a man was caught up;

36.40.3CSEL 64:102

quemadmodum raptus esset, utrum in corpore an extra corpus, incertum sibi esse memorauit. uide stateram sapientiae. constituit unum in Christo et se alterum, qui ait: nescio. quod alienum est attollit, quod suum humiliat. et audiuit, inquit, uerba ineffabilia. non dixit audiui, sed quod alter audierit non negauit. uerecunde itaque testem se maluit significare quam uatem et refugit uideri caelestium arbiter secretorum. testimonium enim dicere ueritatis est, meritum reuelationis non refugere gloriantis. ideoque ait: pro huiusmodi gloriabor, pro me autem non gloriabor.

how he was caught up, whether in the body or out of the body, he said was uncertain to him. See the balance of wisdom. He set one man in Christ and himself as another, who says: "I do not know." What is another's he extols, what is his own he humbles. "And he heard," he says, "ineffable words." He did not say "I heard," but he did not deny that another had heard. Modestly, then, he preferred to signify himself as a witness rather than a seer, and avoided seeming an arbiter of heavenly secrets. For to bear witness belongs to truth; not to refuse the merit of the revelation belongs to one who glories. And so he says: "Of such a one I will glory, but of myself I will not glory."

Explanation 36, chapter 41

36.41.1CSEL 64:102

Quid est autem quod ait audisse hominem, hominem illum in Christo, quae non licet homini loqui? quomodo hoc conuenit, ut non licuerit homini loqui quae licuerit homini audire? si ipsi homini qui audiuit non licet loqui, quomodo ei creditum est audire quod non permissum est loqui? quae ista distantia est? si alteri homini, qui esset exterior, quomodo potuit homo cognoscere quod homini non licebat audire?

And what does he mean that a man, that man in Christ, heard what it is not lawful for a man to speak? How does it fit that it was not lawful for a man to speak what it was lawful for a man to hear? If it is not lawful for the man who heard to speak, how was he entrusted with hearing what he was not permitted to speak? What is this difference? If it means for another man, an outer one, how could a man come to know what it was not lawful for a man to hear?

36.41.2CSEL 64:102–103

unde uidetur non gratia loquendi illi homini defuisse qui esset in Christo, cui non defuit, sed eis qui audirent locum tempus meritum defuisse. ille enim in caelo audiuit et ideo non competere iudicatum est, ut id loqueretur in terris quod audisset in caelo, cum in ipsa terra sit ista discretio, ut quod in altera regione canitur, in altera non canatur, secundum quod scriptum est: quomodo cantabimus canticum domini in terra aliena?

Hence it seems that it was not the grace of speaking that was lacking to that man who was in Christ, for it was not lacking to him, but that place, time and merit were lacking to those who would hear. For he heard in heaven, and so it was judged unfitting that he should speak on earth what he had heard in heaven, since even on earth there is this distinction, that what is sung in one region is not sung in another, according to what is written: "How shall we sing the Lord's song in a foreign land?"

36.41.3CSEL 64:103

denique Hebraei non canebant in terra captiuitatis quod in sua patria canere consueuerant. haec terra captiuitatis est, alia est terra libertatis; ista peccati, illa quietis aeternae; uallestris ista, illa caelestis. ergo in caelo illa nunc praedicat Paulus quae in terris ante praedicare non poterat; inter perfectos enim secreta sapientiae sunt loquenda..

Indeed the Hebrews did not sing in the land of captivity what they had been accustomed to sing in their homeland. This land is one of captivity, another is the land of freedom; this one of sin, that of eternal rest; this one of the valley, that heavenly. In heaven, then, Paul now proclaims what on earth he could not proclaim before; for the secrets of wisdom are to be spoken among the perfect.

Explanation 36, chapter 42

36.42.1CSEL 64:103

Et tamen quid commemoratio istius reuelationis operatur, nisi ut doceat, quod in reuelationibus minime gloriandum sit, sed in infirmitatibus, quia infirmitas et remedium reuelationis et uirtutis exercitium est, contra autem reuelatio elationis lubricum? namque ne sublimitate reuelationis extolleretur ipse Paulus qui raptus in tertium caelum est, stimulum carnis accepit.

And yet what does the mention of this revelation accomplish, if not to teach that one must by no means glory in revelations but in weaknesses, because weakness is both a remedy against revelation and an exercise of virtue, whereas revelation is a slippery path to elation? For lest Paul himself, who was caught up to the third heaven, should be exalted by the sublimity of the revelation, he received a thorn in the flesh.

36.42.2CSEL 64:103

subuenit igitur infirmitas, ne gratia in periculum uerteretur. utilior infirmitas ergo quam gratia. eadem quoque infirmitas officina uirtutis est, sicut testificatus est dominus, quia uirtus in infirmitatibus consummatur. denique iste ipse post reuelationem rogauit remedium sanitatis et non impetrauit, in infirmitate autem remedium non quaesiuit, sed cursum consummauit et coronam inuenit.

Weakness, then, came to the rescue, lest grace turn into danger. Weakness, then, was more useful than grace. That same weakness is also the workshop of virtue, as the Lord testified, that "power is perfected in weaknesses." Indeed after the revelation he asked for the remedy of health and did not obtain it; but in weakness he did not seek a remedy, but finished the course and found the crown.

Explanation 36, chapter 43

36.43.1CSEL 64:103–104

Mutuatur, inquit, peccator et non soluet, iustus autem miseretur et tribuit. hoc quoque personae conuenit Pauli, quia iustus miseretur et tribuit. uide illum domini eloquia diuidentem, uide argentum domini faenerantem.

"The sinner borrows," he says, "and will not repay, but the just man has mercy and gives." This too fits the person of Paul, because the just man has mercy and gives. See him distributing the Lord's words, see him lending the Lord's silver at interest.

36.43.2CSEL 64:104

unam mnam accepit, duas reddidit, duas accepit, quattuor reddidit, quinque accepit, decem reddidit. non ligauit in sudario quod acceperat, sed nummulariis erogauit et quod erogauerat cum usuris recepit. ita et accipientem a peccato maximo liberauit, ne apud eum pecunia domini deperiret, et ipse ut decem ciuitatibus praeficeretur emeruit. quae sint decem ciuitates in epistulis recognosce quas scripsit, etsi apostoli praescripto numero non teneantur, quibus dictum est:

He received one mina and returned two; he received two and returned four; he received five and returned ten. He did not tie up in a napkin what he had received, but paid it out to the money-changers and received back with interest what he had paid out. So he both freed the receiver from the greatest sin, lest the Lord's money perish with him, and himself deserved to be set over ten cities. What the ten cities are, recognize in the epistles he wrote, although the apostles, to whom it was said, are not bound by a prescribed number:

36.43.3CSEL 64:104

ite per orbem uniuersum et praedicate euangelium uniuersae creaturae. hic ergo ab Hierusalem per orientem et Illyricum et Italiam domini pecuniam dispensauit. et ne quis putaret quod suam faeneraret, domini esse pecuniam testabatur dicens: his autem qui matrimonio iuncti sunt denuntio non ego, sed dominus, uxorem a uiro non discedere, et alibi:

"Go into the whole world and preach the gospel to every creature." So he from Jerusalem through the East and Illyricum and Italy dispensed the Lord's money. And lest anyone think he lent his own, he testified that it was the Lord's money, saying: "To those who are joined in marriage I give charge, not I but the Lord, that the wife should not depart from her husband"; and elsewhere:

36.43.4CSEL 64:104

quid experimentum quaeritis eius qui in me loquitur Christus? denique ipse rex haec dixit, in quo figura est domini: oportuit te pecuniam meam committere nummulariis. meam, inquit, non tuam. iustus ergo miseretur et tribuit. quomodo tribuat, audi dicentem: per omnes ecclesias doceo. peccator autem mutuatur et non soluit. uide diuitem mutuantem et non reddentem, pauperem accipientem et continuo remunerantem, ne diutius in aere alieno sit. haec moralia.

"Do you seek proof of Christ who speaks in me?" Indeed the king himself, in whom there is a figure of the Lord, said this: "You ought to have entrusted my money to the money-changers." "My," he says, not "yours." The just man, then, has mercy and gives. Hear him saying how he gives: "I teach in all the churches." But the sinner borrows and does not repay. See the rich man borrowing and not repaying, the poor man receiving and at once paying back, lest he remain longer in debt. So much for the moral sense.

Explanation 36, chapter 44

36.44.1CSEL 64:104–105

Uide nunc pauperem mysticum, id est simplicem et timentem dei nomen, audientem uerbum de castitate et soluentem, audientem de misericordia et soluentem, audientem de placiditate et non irascentem, diuitem uero illum arrogantem et superbum audientem quidem, sed post se reicientem sermones dei, audientem de condemnatione luxuriae et magis luxuriantem.

See now the mystical poor man, that is, the simple man who fears God's name, hearing the word about chastity and repaying it, hearing about mercy and repaying it, hearing about gentleness and not becoming angry; but that arrogant and proud rich man hearing indeed, but casting God's words behind him, hearing about the condemnation of luxury and indulging in luxury the more.

36.44.2CSEL 64:105

denique ecclesia soluit quod accepit, synagoga non soluit. cognosce ecclesiam soluere: tui, inquit, erant et mihi eos dedisti, et uerbum tuum seruauerunt, et alibi: ipse enim pater diligit uos, quia uos me diligitis. reddidit ergo ecclesia quam accepit a domino pecuniam caritatis, sed synagoga non reddidit. ideoque de Iudaeis dicitur: si non uenissem et locutus non fuissem his, peccatum non haberent; nunc autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo, quia audierunt utique et non crediderunt.

In short, the church repays what it received; the synagogue does not repay. Recognize that the church repays: "They were yours," he says, "and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word"; and elsewhere: "For the Father himself loves you, because you have loved me." The church, then, returned the money of love which it received from the Lord, but the synagogue did not return it. And so it is said of the Jews: "If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin," because they certainly heard and did not believe.

36.44.3CSEL 64:105

probatum est ergo, quia mutuati sunt peccatores et non soluerunt. peccator igitur eget semper, iustus autem abundat et tribuit, cuius diues est conscientia. ideo Iudaei in suis diuitiis eguerunt — diuites eguerunt et esurierunt —, christiani autem in diuitiis simplicitatis suae non defecerunt.

It is proved, then, that sinners borrowed and did not repay. The sinner, then, is always in need, but the just man abounds and gives, whose conscience is rich. So the Jews were in need in their riches ("the rich were in want and went hungry"), but Christians did not fail in the riches of their simplicity.

Explanation 36, chapter 45

36.45.1CSEL 64:105

Bonus ergo iustus, et ideo addidit scriptura: quoniam benedicentes eum possidebunt terram, maledicentes autem eum disperihunt. quomodo iustus possidet terram aut quam terram, cum scriptura dicat: numquid soli habitabitis super terram?, et alibi: uae habitantibus super terram, quod increpationis est atque maledicti? cuius ergo terrae benedicta possessio est? non istius quae tenebris absconditur et amaritudinibus impletur, sed illius quae fluit mel et lac, id est habens gratiam suauitatis et fulgorem lucis aeternae.

The just man, then, is good, and so Scripture added: "For those who bless him will possess the land, but those who curse him will perish." How does the just man possess the land, or what land, when Scripture says: "Will you alone dwell on the earth?" and elsewhere: "Woe to those who dwell on the earth," which is a word of rebuke and curse? Of what land, then, is the possession blessed? Not of this one, which is hidden in darkness and filled with bitterness, but of that which flows with honey and milk, that is, has the grace of sweetness and the brightness of eternal light.

36.45.2CSEL 64:105–106

accipe mellis boni suauitatem, immo super mel: fugit dolor et tristitia et gemitus, quia suauitatis gratia amaritudinem humanae fragilitatis excludet. et alibi: et delebit omnem lacrimam de oculis eorum et mors non erit amplius neque luctus. accipe etiam lactis nitorem: et non indigebunt lucerna et lumine solis; ipse enim dominus inluminabit super illos et regnabunt in saecula saeculorum.

Take the sweetness of good honey, rather, sweeter than honey: "Pain and sadness and groaning have fled," because the grace of sweetness will shut out the bitterness of human frailty. And elsewhere: "And he will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, nor mourning." Take also the brightness of the milk: "And they will not need a lamp or the light of the sun; for the Lord himself will give light upon them, and they will reign for ever and ever."

Explanation 36, chapter 46

36.46.1CSEL 64:106

Est etiam mysticus iustus qui miseretur et tribuit, qui omnia uerba quae accepit a patre dedit nobis et peccatorum nostrorum nobis aera dimisit et sanguinem suum pro nostris debitis soluit, ut non in faenore essemus alieno, sed in suo aere bonus creditor nos haberet. est et peccator ille qui congregauit quae non peperit

There is also a mystical just man who has mercy and gives, who gave us all the words he received from the Father, forgave us the debts of our sins, and paid his blood for our debts, so that we should not be in another's usury, but the good creditor might hold us in his own debt. And there is that sinner who gathered what he did not bring forth

36.46.2CSEL 64:106

et mutuatus est quod non tenebat nec uult restituere quod accepit. audi quia mutuatus est diabolus: tibi, inquit, dabo potestatem hanc uniuersam et gloriam illorum, quia mihi tradita sunt et cui uolo do illa, si procidens adoraueris me. nequissime, accepisti ad temptationem, non ad mortem, hoc est: accepisti ut,

and borrowed what he did not own, and will not give back what he received. Hear that the devil borrowed: "To you," he says, "I will give all this power and their glory, because they have been handed over to me, and I give them to whom I will, if you fall down and worship me." Most wicked one, you received it for testing, not for death; that is, you received it so that

36.46.3CSEL 64:106

probarentur dei seruuli, non ut extinguerentur, accepisti ut deus adoraretur, non ut negaretur. accepisti saecularia; cur eripis quae aeterna sunt? accepisti quae mundi sunt; cur uis auferre quae Christi sunt? da illa cui uis, non inuidemus; cur nobis a te quae nos uolumus inuidentur? tu adorari uis, qui omnibus nequior ipsa quoque indignus es seruitute?

God's servants might be proved, not destroyed; you received it so that God might be worshipped, not denied. You received the things of the world; why do you snatch what is eternal? You received what belongs to the world; why do you want to take away what belongs to Christ? Give those things to whom you will, we do not envy; why are we grudged by you what we want? Do you want to be worshipped, who, more wicked than all, are unworthy even of slavery?

Explanation 36, chapter 47

36.47.1CSEL 64:106–107

A domino gressus uiri corrigentur. Graecus bia$r\\ixaxa dixit, hoc est transitus, et ideo dicitur tibi: si transeas per aquam, flumina te non concludent. transi ergo, noli cessare, sicut bonus uiator, cum uenerit ad aliquod uiae signum, non stat, sed pertransit; et tu in uia es, quamdiu in hoc cursu es constitutus. Paulus si stetisset, cursum suum non consummasset. uide ne ideo dicat et tu qui stas uide ne cadas; non enim qui transiuit potest timere ne cadat.

"By the Lord a man's steps will be corrected." The Greek said "steps" in the sense of crossings, that is, passages, and so it is said to you: "If you pass through water, the rivers will not shut you in." Pass on, then, do not stop, as a good traveller, when he comes to some milestone of the road, does not stand but passes by; and you too are on the way, as long as you are set in this course. Had Paul stood still, he would not have finished his course. See that he does not say for this reason: "And you who stand, see that you do not fall"; for he who has passed on cannot fear falling.

36.47.2CSEL 64:107

uidi, inquit, impium superexaltatum et eleuatum super cedros Libani et transiui, et ecce non erat. uidens ergo impium superexaltatum qui non stetit, non offendit; si stetisset, miratus illum fuisset et secutus esset, offenderat et ceciderat sicut impius. ideo Moyses uidens rubum relucere et non ardere ait: transiens uidebo hoc uisum magnum. qui transit de hoc saeculo, magnum uisum uidet; qui soluit uincula istius nexus, quo ligamur huic corpori, uisum magnum uidet.

"I saw," he says, "the ungodly man exalted and lifted above the cedars of Lebanon; and I passed by, and behold, he was not." Seeing, then, the ungodly man exalted, he who did not stand did not stumble; had he stood, he would have admired him and followed him, would have stumbled and fallen like the ungodly man. So Moses, seeing the bush shining and not burning, said: "Passing over, I will see this great sight." He who passes over from this world sees a great sight; he who loosens the chains of this bond by which we are tied to this body sees a great sight.

36.47.3CSEL 64:107

Moyses [in Exodo legitur] multa uidet miracula in Exodo; non tanta alius uidet qui non est in exodo. idem Moyses transiuit; transiuit et populus patrum, quia de terra captiuitatis exibat. dirigebantur itaque a domino gressus eorum, quibus per noctem ignis columna lucebat, per diem nubis, ut nec diei ardor afficeret commeantes nec impedimentum uiantibus tenebrae noctis afferrent.

Moses saw many miracles in the Exodus; another who is not in the exodus does not see so many. The same Moses passed through; the people of the fathers passed through too, because they were going out of the land of captivity. So their steps were directed by the Lord, for whom a pillar of fire shone by night, of cloud by day, so that neither the heat of day should afflict the travellers nor the darkness of night hinder the wayfarers.

Explanation 36, chapter 48

36.48.1CSEL 64:107

Et tu merere factis uotisque deposce, ut gressus tui a domino dirigantur, ne moueantur pedes tui, quia scriptum est: mei autem paene moti sunt pedes, paulo minus effusi sunt gressus mei. cauendum est quoque, ne rectam semitam derelinquas et deuerticula te uiarum tortuosarum decipiant. ideo dicitur: parate uiam domino, rectas facite semitas eius.

You too, deserve by deeds and ask in prayers that your steps may be directed by the Lord, lest your feet be moved, for it is written: "But my feet were almost moved, my steps had well-nigh slipped." We must take care too not to abandon the straight path and be deceived by the byways of crooked roads. So it is said: "Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight."

36.48.2CSEL 64:107–108

paremus ergo uiam domino deo nostro in mentibus nostris, rectas faciamus semitas eius, rectas faciamus animorum semitas, ne labamur. non effundantur gressus nostri sicut uxoris Loth, quae post se respexit et gressus tenere non potuit, sed effusi sunt, cum in salem esset repente conuersa. non effundantur sicut Aegyptiorum, quorum gressum maris fluctus effudit. ipsis Hebraeis, qui cum Moyse erant, quia peccauerunt in deserto, ceciderunt uestigia pedum, ne in terram resurrectionis intrarent.

Let us prepare, then, the way of the Lord our God in our minds; let us make his paths straight, let us make straight the paths of our souls, lest we slip. Let our steps not slip like those of Lot's wife, who looked back and could not keep her steps, but they slipped when she was suddenly turned into salt. Let them not slip like those of the Egyptians, whose step the waves of the sea overthrew. Even the Hebrews who were with Moses, because they sinned in the desert, the footsteps of their feet fell, so that they did not enter the land of resurrection.

Explanation 36, chapter 49

36.49.1CSEL 64:108

Nonne etiam de his pulchre dicitur, quia effusi sunt processus eorum, quorum spes lapsae, in uanum effusus labor, uota sunt destituta? considera enim aliquem per aliquot annos habuisse studium probitatis, castitatis custodiam, uitae attentioris affectum, piae propositum seruitutis, sedulae obseruationis officium subitoque

Is it not also finely said of these that their progress has slipped away, whose hopes have fallen, whose labor has been poured out in vain, whose vows have been abandoned? Consider someone who for several years has had zeal for uprightness, the guarding of chastity, a love of a more careful life, the purpose of pious service, the duty of diligent observance, and suddenly

36.49.2CSEL 64:108

eum esse mutatum, discessisse de monasterio, ualedixisse ieiuniis, continentiae renuntiasse, indulgere deliciis, studere luxuriae. dudum de monasteriis exierunt et nunc luxuriae sunt magistri, disseminatores incontinentiae, incentores petulantiae, obtrectatores pudoris. nonne de his pulchre dixeris: effusi sunt gressus eorum, quos bene direxisse paenituit? egerunt itaque noui generis paenitentiam pro uirtutibus et non agunt pro delictis. sed hi ex nobis exierunt, dicit Iohannes, sed non erant ex nobis; si

he is changed, has left the monastery, said farewell to fasts, renounced continence, indulges in delights, pursues luxury. Not long ago they went out of the monasteries, and now they are teachers of luxury, sowers of incontinence, inciters of wantonness, detractors of modesty. Will you not say finely of these: their steps have slipped, who regretted having directed them well? They have done penance of a new kind, for their virtues, and do none for their offenses. But "these went out from us," says John, "but they were not of us; for if

36.49.3CSEL 64:108

enim ex nobis fuissent, nobiscum perseuerassent: hi ergo uiam suam condemnauerunt, quibus conuenit dici: o qui dereliquistis semitas rectas abeundo in uias tenebrarum et qui laetamini in malis et gaudetis in euersione mala, quorum semitae prauae et flexuosi cursus eorum, sicut lubricus et flexuosus auctor ipsorum. cur odisse coepistis rectam uiam et iustum consilium deseruistis? non uos direxit dominus. quem autem dirigit dominus, uiam eius cupiet, sicut scriptum est, et ipsius semitis delectabitur.

they had been of us, they would have remained with us." These, then, have condemned their own way, to whom it is fitting to say: "O you who have left the straight paths, going into ways of darkness, and who rejoice in evil things and are glad in evil overthrow, whose paths are crooked and their courses winding," like their slippery and winding author. Why have you begun to hate the straight way and deserted just counsel? The Lord has not directed you. But he whom the Lord directs will desire his way, as it is written, and will delight in his paths.

Explanation 36, chapter 50

36.50.1CSEL 64:108–109

Utrumque tamen intellegi potest — ita est medium —, quod et ipse qui a domino dirigitur uiam domini cupiet, quia duce ipso omnis leuatur labor, omnia impedimenta remouentur, incentiua subministrantur, et ipse dominus non aspernatur, sed libenter accipit uiam uiri quem ad uirtutem ipse direxerit. pulchre autem gressus uiri dirigi dicuntur a domino, quia non uolentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est dei sine offensione seruare uestigium. qui enim plantat et rigat nihil sunt, sed qui dat incrementum deus, ipsi soli gloria uirtutum iure defertur.

Both senses, however, can be understood (the phrase is so balanced): that he who is directed by the Lord will desire the Lord's way, because with him as guide every labor is lightened, all hindrances are removed, incentives are supplied; and that the Lord himself does not spurn but gladly accepts the way of the man whom he himself has directed to virtue. Finely, too, a man's steps are said to be directed by the Lord, because it is not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who has mercy, to keep one's step without stumbling. For he who plants and he who waters are nothing, but God who gives the increase: to him alone the glory of virtues is rightly given.

Explanation 36, chapter 51

36.51.1CSEL 64:109

Denique etiam iustus cadit interdum. sed si iustus est, cum ceciderit non conturbabitur. quod condicionis est cadit, quod iustitiae resurgit, quoniam iustum deus non derelinquit, sed confirmat manum eius. qua ratione non pedem, sed manum dixit nisi forte ea, quoniam qui cadit non magis pede labitur, sed infirmus lubrico saepe decipitur uel offendit in petra? hic autem iusti casum intellege, id est fortioris.

Indeed, even the just man sometimes falls. But if he is just, when he falls he will not be troubled. What belongs to his condition falls; what belongs to justice rises, since God does not abandon the just man but strengthens his hand. Why did he say not "foot" but "hand," unless perhaps because one who falls does not slip by the foot so much, but the weak man is often deceived on a slippery place or stumbles on a rock? But here understand the fall of the just man, that is, of the stronger.

36.51.2CSEL 64:109

denique de populo qui luctatur, si genu fixerit uel pede lapsus fuerit, pro uicto habetur. athleta, qui luctandi peritiam habet et ad coronam luctatur, etiam uolens genu figit, ut uincat, et si lapsus fuerit non excluditur et si ab eo, qui superior sit, prematur, manibus tamen se sustinens iure decertat nec aufertur brauium, nisi fuerit fusus in uentrem aut distentus uinculo lacertorum. inde oriuntur crebra certamina, quia multa et incognita plerisque sunt genera ruinarum. nam casus eorum proprie appellant ruinam;

Indeed, among the people who wrestle, if one goes down on his knee or slips with his foot, he is counted as beaten. An athlete who has the skill of wrestling and wrestles for the crown even goes down on his knee deliberately in order to win; and if he has slipped he is not excluded, and if he is pressed by one who is on top, yet holding himself up with his hands he contends lawfully, and the prize is not taken from him unless he has been laid flat on his belly or pinned by the grip of arms. Hence frequent contests arise, because there are many kinds of falls unknown to most. For they properly call their falls "ruins";

36.51.3CSEL 64:109

Graece enim πτώματα nuncupantur. ergo cum stringitur et urgetur, saepe se uoluit et fit supra qui inferior habebatur superioremque dum surgit elidit. quod uidetur scriptura significare, cum dicit: uniuersum stratum uersasti in infirmitate eius. itaque de eo dicitur: cum ceciderit bonus athleta, non turbatur. plerique etiam uolunt teneri, quo maturius uincant, qui de arte praesumunt.

for in Greek they are called πτώματα (falls). So when he is gripped and pressed, he often rolls himself over, and the one who was held to be underneath gets on top and, as he rises, throws down the one above. This Scripture seems to signify when it says: "You have turned over all his bed in his weakness." And so it is said of him: when the good athlete falls, he is not troubled. Many, too, who trust in their art even want to be held, so as to win sooner.

36.51.4CSEL 64:109–110

sed etiamsi assignatus, ut ipso uerbo utar, et primo et secundo fuerit, non excluditur; licet ei interdum reparare luctamen et uincere saepe contingit et cedere eum qui secunda contentione superauerit. ita ergo etiam iustus etiamsi offendiculum incurrerit

But even if he has been marked down, to use the very word, both a first and a second time, he is not excluded; he is sometimes allowed to renew the struggle, and it often happens that he wins and that the one who overcame him in the second bout yields. So, then, the just man too, even if he has met with a stumbling-block

36.51.5CSEL 64:110

et ceciderit, non relinquat tamen studium deuotionis et fidei, sobrietatem teneat, paenitentiam gerat, saepe se reparet. ideoque interrogat Petrus: si peccauerit in me frater meus, quotiens remittam ei? usque septies? et respondit dominus: non solum septies, sed etiam septuagies septies. ut scias autem, quia athletae sumus et inpellimur et alii ruunt et plerique eliduntur, audi dicentem:

and fallen, should not abandon the zeal of devotion and faith; let him hold to sobriety, do penance, often restore himself. And so Peter asks: "If my brother sins against me, how often shall I forgive him? Up to seven times?" And the Lord answered: "Not only seven times, but seventy times seven." And so that you may know that we are athletes, and are pushed, and others fall, and many are thrown down, hear one saying:

36.51.6CSEL 64:110

suffulcit dominus omnes qui ruunt et corrigit omnes elisos. unde et ipse de se dicit Dauid uel ille qui locutus est in propheta: inpulsus subuersus sum ut caderem, et dominus suscepit me; Iesus enim non cecidit, sed inpulsus est. etenim cum ipse conuertat elisos, quomodo ipse potuit elidi? iustum autem, cum ceciderit, posse resurgere testatur scriptura, quae dicit: numquid qui cadit non adiciat ut resurgat? aut qui auersus fuerit non reuertitur? uae his qui auertuntur auersione inpudenti, dicit dominus.

"The Lord upholds all who fall and raises up all who are thrown down." Hence too David says of himself, or he who spoke in the prophet: "Pushed, I was overturned so as to fall, and the Lord took me up"; for Jesus did not fall, but was pushed. For since he himself raises the thrown, how could he himself be thrown down? And that the just man, when he has fallen, can rise again Scripture testifies, saying: "Does he who falls not add to rise again? Or does he who has turned away not return? Woe to those who turn away with a shameless turning away, says the Lord."

Explanation 36, chapter 52

36.52.1CSEL 64:110–111

Utinam quidem inluctabilis et insuperabilis sit Christi athleta et in omni aetate, in omni uirtutum genere gloriosus, sicut ille ait: sed in omnibus superamus propter eum qui nos dilexit! quid est in omnibus? sunt athletae qui uocentur pueri, ephebi, uiri, hoc est παῖδες, ἀγένειοι, ἄνδρες. etiam scriptura has in luctatoribus nouit aetates dicente Dauid: ne auertas faciem tuam a puero tuo, et: iuuenis fui et senui.

Would that Christ's athlete were unconquerable and unbeatable and glorious at every age, in every kind of virtue, as he says: "But in all things we overcome because of him who loved us"! What is "in all things"? There are athletes who are called boys, youths, men, that is, παῖδες, ἀγένειοι, ἄνδρες. Scripture too knows these ages among wrestlers, when David says: "Do not turn your face from your boy," and: "I was young and have grown old."

36.52.2CSEL 64:111

unde et Iohannes ait: scribo uobis, pueri, quia cognouistis patrem. scribo uobis, iuuenes, quia uicistis malum. scribo uobis, patres, quia cognouistis eum qui est ab initio. maturior itaque ad fratres scribens maturos designat fidei deuotionisque processu. uirtutum ergo istae, non infirmitatis aetates sunt; neque enim sine uirtute est puer qui cognouit patrem deum uirtutum.

Hence John too says: "I write to you, boys, because you have known the Father. I write to you, young men, because you have overcome evil. I write to you, fathers, because you have known him who is from the beginning." Writing to the brothers, then, he marks the mature by progress of faith and devotion. These, then, are ages of virtue, not of weakness; for the boy who has known the Father, the God of powers, is not without virtue.

36.52.3CSEL 64:111

ex illo puero isti sunt pueri, qui, priusquam sciret uocare patrem aut matrem, accepit uirtutem Damasci et spolia Samariae. ipse est puer qui natus est nobis, filius datus est nobis, cuius principium super humeros eius. ipse nos docuit pueritiam esse uirtutem dicens: sinite eos et nolite prohibere pueros ad me uenire, et alibi: amen amen dico uobis, nisi conuersi fueritis et efficiamini sicut puer iste, non intrabitis in regnum caelorum.

From that Boy come these boys, he who, before he knew how to call father or mother, received the power of Damascus and the spoils of Samaria. He is the Boy who is born to us, the Son who is given to us, whose rule is upon his shoulders. He himself taught us that childhood is virtue, saying: "Let them be and do not forbid the children to come to me," and elsewhere: "Amen, amen I say to you, unless you are converted and become like this child, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven."

36.52.4CSEL 64:111

ipsa quoque corporis fortitudine pueri plerumque uiros uincunt. et utique si aetatem pueritiae consideremus, non potest puer aut usum omnem scire aut uim subire luctandi; nouimus tamen, quod frequenter pueri quos non poterant portare uicerunt; adeo uigor animi infirmitatem excludit aetatis.

And even in bodily strength boys often defeat men. And certainly, if we consider the age of boyhood, a boy cannot know the whole practice or endure the force of wrestling; yet we know that boys have often defeated those they could not carry; so far does vigor of mind shut out weakness of age.

Explanation 36, chapter 53

36.53.1CSEL 64:111

Quales autem pueri, tales et ephebi, hoc est spiritales. nouit scriptura adulescentem Paulum iam proximum conuersioni, nouit et Eutychum adulescentem, qui cum sermonibus Pauli intentus haereret, somno uictus de tritecto cecidit et resurrexit, nouit et Iohannem adulescentem in Christi pectore recumbentem, qui tam fortis fuit, ut persecutionem non timeret, malum uinceret.

As the boys are, so are the youths, that is, spiritual. Scripture knows the young man Paul, already near his conversion; it knows the young man Eutychus too, who, clinging intently to Paul's words, overcome by sleep, fell from the third storey and rose again; it knows John too, a young man, reclining on Christ's breast, who was so strong that he did not fear persecution and overcame evil.

36.53.2CSEL 64:111–112

hic est puer, qui patrem genitalem reliquit, secutus est patrem eum quem cognouit aeternum, adulescens amictus sindone dominum sequebatur tempore passionis, qui sua omnia dereliquerat, maturior deum uerbum in principio ipso semper fuisse atque esse cognouit et manere in se probauit.

He is the boy who left his natural father and followed the Father whom he knew as eternal; as a young man wrapped in a linen cloth he followed the Lord at the time of the passion, having left all his things; more mature, he knew that God the Word always was and is in the beginning, and proved that he abides in himself.

Explanation 36, chapter 54

36.54.1CSEL 64:112

Uiros quoque scriptura nos docuit spiritales Agabo propheta dicente: uirum hunc cuius est zona haec sic alligabunt Iudaei in Hierusalem, et Festus ait: uir quidam est relictus a Felice in custodia. ante passionem suam Paulus adulescens dicitur, in passione sua uir significatur, qui cursu consummato esset iam proximus ad coronam.

Scripture has also taught us spiritual men, when the prophet Agabus says: "The man whose belt this is the Jews will bind thus in Jerusalem," and Festus says: "There is a certain man left in custody by Felix." Before his passion Paul is called a young man; in his passion he is signified as a man, who, having finished his course, was already near the crown.

Explanation 36, chapter 55

36.55.1CSEL 64:112

Cognouimus aetates pro fide et deuotione certantes. cognoscamus etiam genera certaminum singulorum. haec quoque scripturae nos doceat tenor. in hoc itaque saeculari agone alii sunt qui simplici quodam et legitimo genere luctantur et ligaturis tantum corporis certant, uerberare non norunt, qui palaestae uocantur, alii qui caedem et pulueris iactum membrorum nisibus miscent omni sibi uerberandi iure permisso, quos pammacharios uocant, eo quod omnis litis et pugnae aduersum se habeant potestatem, alii qui caestibus aduersum se decernunt et dilaceratis capitibus cruciantur; hi pyctae feruntur.

We have learned the ages that contend for faith and devotion; let us learn also the kinds of the several contests. Let the course of the Scriptures teach us these too. In this worldly contest, then, there are some who wrestle in a simple and regular kind and contend only by holds of the body, and do not know how to strike, who are called wrestlers; others who mix blows and the throwing of dust with the efforts of their limbs, with every right of striking allowed them, whom they call pammachoi, because they have power of every kind of struggle and fight against one another; others who contend against one another with the gloves and are tortured with torn heads: these are called boxers.

Explanation 36, chapter 56

36.56.1CSEL 64:112–113

Haec omnia certamina subiit apostolus Paulus, sicut ipse demonstrat. itaque alibi dicit: quoniam non est nobis πάλη aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus principes et potestates et — ut compendio utar — aduersus nequitias spiritales. in Latinis plerisque conluctatio repperitur, in Graecis omnibus πάλη scribitur; πάλη enim Graecorum lucta est Latinorum.

All these contests the apostle Paul underwent, as he himself shows. So he says elsewhere: "For our wrestling (πάλη) is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers and" (to be brief) "against the spiritual forces of wickedness." In most Latin copies "struggle" is found; in all the Greek, πάλη is written; for the Greeks' πάλη is the Latins' wrestling.

36.56.2CSEL 64:113

et uere πάλη, quia caro et sanguis et nequitiae spiritales patientia et continentia corporis et animi moderatione superantur. ira furor caedes arma sunt diaboli. alibi quoque plagis supra modum caesum se esse significat dicens: in plagis supra modum, in mortibus frequenter, Hierosolymis autem pugnis se esse percussum. ubi cum interuenientibus militibus aliquando cessassent Iudaei percutere Paulum, ipse pontifex Ananias circumstantibus iussit percutere os eius.

And truly πάλη (wrestling), because flesh and blood and the spiritual forces of wickedness are overcome by patience and continence of body and moderation of mind. Anger, fury, slaughter are the devil's weapons. Elsewhere too he signifies that he was beaten with blows beyond measure, saying: "in blows beyond measure, in deaths often," and that at Jerusalem he was struck with fists. There, when, soldiers intervening, the Jews had at one point stopped beating Paul, the high priest Ananias himself ordered those standing by to strike his mouth.

36.56.3CSEL 64:113

cui respondit apostolus: percutere te incipiet deus, paries dealbate; et tu sedens iudicas me secundum legem et extra legem iubes me percuti? sciuit profecto referire qui grauiore pugno pontificem repercussit; ipse enim corporaliter caesus est, illi retulit quod in animam percuteretur a Christo. in prima quoque epistula ad Corinthios scribens ait: ego igitur sic curro non ut in incertum, sic enitor non ut aera caedens. quod Latine dixit enitor, Graece ait πυκτεύω.

To him the apostle answered: "God will strike you, you whitewashed wall; and do you sit to judge me according to the law, and contrary to the law order me to be struck?" He certainly knew how to strike back, who struck the high priest back with a heavier fist; for he himself was struck bodily, and he returned to the other that he would be struck in the soul by Christ. Writing too in the first epistle to the Corinthians he says: "So I run, not as uncertainly; so I strive, not as beating the air." What he said in Latin as "I strive," in Greek he says πυκτεύω ("I box").

36.56.4CSEL 64:113

et uere quasi bonus pycta non aerem, sed aerias potestates et Iudaeorum capita uerberabat, quia caput omnium Iesum dominum non habebant. in omni itaque certamine apostolus est probatus, qui etiam coronam cursu consummato accepit. unde et ipse ait: omnia possum in eo qui me confortat.

And truly, like a good boxer, he struck not the air but the powers of the air and the heads of the Jews, because they did not have the Lord Jesus as head of all. In every contest, then, the apostle was proved, who also received the crown when he had finished the course. Hence he himself says: "I can do all things in him who strengthens me."

Explanation 36, chapter 57

36.57.1CSEL 64:113–114

Habet et Christus qui in pueritia sua aeui maturos uicerint, ut Danihel puer spiritu ualido seniores illos redarguit Iudaeorum et de uictoriae iure deiecit in mortem. habet et alios qui, priusquam nascerentur, in matris uentre luctati sunt. denique Iacob fratrem subplantauit Esau et malum uicit atque ita de utero matris exiuit, ut uictoriae insigne monstraret et pedem senioris degeneris uictor inuerteret. Hieremias in uulua matris sanctificatus est et probatus.

Christ also has those who in their boyhood overcame men mature in age, as Daniel, a boy, with a strong spirit refuted those Jewish elders and by right of victory cast them down to death. He has others too who wrestled in their mother's womb before they were born. Indeed Jacob supplanted his brother Esau and overcame evil, and so came out of his mother's womb as to show a mark of victory and, as victor, overturn the foot of the degenerate elder. Jeremiah was sanctified and approved in his mother's womb.

36.57.2CSEL 64:114

Iohannes Baptista principem agonis humani praemiatoremque luctantium necdum natus uenisse cognouit atque in utero matris exiliens piae brauium confessionis emeruit. recte iam tunc designatus est ad coronam qui ante omnes ad Christi agonem fidei testis et praeco uirtutis suum nomen obtulerat. bonus praeco, qui ad certamen alios excitabat et uere bonus praeco, qui tam magna uoce clamauit, ut ad eius sonum secreta caelestia resultarent.

John the Baptist, not yet born, knew that the president of the human contest and giver of prizes to the wrestlers had come, and, leaping in his mother's womb, won the prize of pious confession. Rightly was he already then marked out for the crown, who before all had offered his name for Christ's contest as witness of faith and herald of virtue. A good herald, who roused others to the contest; and truly a good herald, who cried with so great a voice that at its sound the heavenly secrets echoed.

36.57.3CSEL 64:114

quid multa? terram mouit, caelum impleuit. ideoque uocis nomen accepit, quia uerbum dei uox sacrata praecessit, quemadmodum ipse nos docuit dicens: ego uox clamantis in deserto. dixit hoc Esaias propheta, de se dictum iste firmauit. audiuimus quid dixit praeco: parate uiam domini, rectas facite semitas eius. haec est uox singularis et sola tam sonora, ut ab omnibus audiretur, tam dulcis, ut uniuersorum corda mulceret. iustos ergo athletas suos dominus confirmauit, ut uincerent; numquam enim suos deserit et relinquit.

What more? He moved the earth, filled heaven. And so he received the name of voice, because a sacred voice went before the Word of God, as he himself taught us, saying: "I am the voice of one crying in the desert." Isaiah the prophet said it; he confirmed that it was said of him. We have heard what the herald said: "Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight." This is the singular voice, alone so resonant that it was heard by all, so sweet that it soothed the hearts of all. The Lord, then, strengthened his just athletes to win; for he never deserts and abandons his own.

Explanation 36, chapter 58

36.58.1CSEL 64:114–115

Et ideo addidit propheta: iuuenis fui et senui. sic Latini; aliqui autem iuxta Graecos habent: iuuenis fui; etenim senui et non uidi iustum derelictum nec semen eius quaerens panem. simpliciter qui uult intellegere, patet sensus, quod uitae suae tempore Dauid non uiderit iustum derelictum. sed hoc et breuis temporis est et incredibile; siquidem multos uidemus in saeculo iustos ab hominibus derelinqui, quando eos aliqui potentium persecuntur, et nullus ad eos audet accedere, cum se in timore aut iniuria uiderit constitutos.

And so the prophet added: "I was young and have grown old." So the Latins; but some, following the Greeks, have: "I was young; for I have grown old, and I have not seen the just man forsaken nor his seed seeking bread." For one who wants to understand simply, the sense is plain: that in his lifetime David did not see a just man forsaken. But this is both of short time and incredible; for we see many just men in the world forsaken by men, when some of the powerful persecute them, and no one dares to approach them, when he sees them set in fear or injury.

36.58.2CSEL 64:115

unde Iob dicit: fratres mei discesserunt, agnouerunt extraneos magis quam me; amici mei inmisericordes facti sunt et qui me nouerant obliti sunt nomen meum. Dauid quoque non solum destitutum, sed etiam inpugnatum se ab amicis et proximis clamat: amici, inquit, mei et proximi mei aduersum me appropinquauerunt. ergo si in hoc saeculo repperiuntur iusti derelicti, quomodo sibi contraria dixit Dauid, nisi intellegas quod iustus, etsi in saeculo derelinquitur, a domino tamen non derelinquitur?

Hence Job says: "My brothers have gone away, they have acknowledged strangers rather than me; my friends have become merciless and those who knew me have forgotten my name." David too cries that he was not only forsaken but even attacked by friends and neighbors: "My friends," he says, "and my neighbors drew near against me." If, then, just men are found forsaken in this world, how did David say things contrary to himself, unless you understand that the just man, even if forsaken in the world, is yet not forsaken by the Lord?

36.58.3CSEL 64:115

neque enim Iob, cum esset in stercore, a domino derelictus est, quem in angelorum concilio dominus ipse sua uoce laudabat, quem temptari passus est ut coronaret; temptationem autem in corpus dedit, in animam denegauit. nec derelictus Dauid, cui regnum dedit, ut populo imperaret electo, quem parricidalibus proeliis appetitum, regni sui depulsum finibus, uictoriae iure restituit.

For neither was Job, when he sat on the dung heap, forsaken by the Lord, whom the Lord himself praised with his own voice in the council of the angels, whom he allowed to be tempted so as to crown him; he gave the temptation power over the body, he denied it over the soul. Nor was David forsaken, to whom he gave the kingdom, to rule the chosen people; when he was attacked in parricidal battles and driven from the borders of his kingdom, he restored him by right of victory.

36.58.4CSEL 64:115

ipsi quoque Iacob, Helias et Heliseus et Iohannes Baptista et ceteri, qui in caprinis pellibus circumeuntes errabant in solitudinibus et montibus et speluncis et foueis terrae, licet ludibria multa et acerba supplicia tolerasse uideantur, tamen non derelicti sunt. siquidem cum fratrem fugeret Iacob et per deserta incomitatus erraret, obdormiuit et surgens uidit ibi multitudinem caelestis militiae et ait: hic locus uocatur castra angelorum. non satis fuit castrum uocare, sed castra, quae tantae multitudini conuenirent.

Jacob himself too, Elijah and Elisha and John the Baptist and the others who went about in goatskins, wandering in deserts and mountains and caves and holes of the earth, though they seem to have endured many mockeries and bitter punishments, were nevertheless not forsaken. For when Jacob fled his brother and wandered alone through the desert, he fell asleep and, rising, saw there a multitude of the heavenly army and said: "This place is called the camps of angels." It was not enough to call it a camp, but camps, as suited so great a multitude.

36.58.5CSEL 64:115–116

uides ergo quia solum se putabat et castra eum caelestis exercitus sequebantur, sicut et patres nostros Moysi tempore, ne in deserto sitirent, petra, ut scriptum est, sequebatur. nam cum in Exodo legerimus, quod sitiente populo percussit Moyses uirga petram et aqua fluxit et bibit populus dei, iterum in Leuitico legerimus uel in Numeris, quod rursus Moyses tetigerit petram uirga et scaturiuerit aqua patribus ad bibendum, praeclare apostolus hoc interpretatus est dicens: bibebant autem de consequenti eos petra, petra autem erat Christus.

You see, then, that he thought himself alone, and the camps of the heavenly army followed him, just as the rock, as it is written, followed our fathers in Moses' time, so that they should not thirst in the desert. For when we read in Exodus that, the people thirsting, Moses struck the rock with his rod and water flowed and the people of God drank, and again read in Leviticus or in Numbers that Moses again touched the rock with his rod and water gushed out for the fathers to drink, the apostle excellently interpreted this, saying: "And they drank from the rock that followed them, and the rock was Christ."

36.58.6CSEL 64:116

illos igitur querulos, illos murmurantes, illos praeuaricantes tamen non deserebat dominus, sed sequebatur. quid de Helia et Heliseo dicam, quibus per deserta gradientibus equi de caelo et igneus currus occurrit? quomodo derelictus Helias, qui est inuitatus a Christo? quomodo derelictus in terris, qui raptus ad caelum? quomodo egens et nudus et inanis, qui geminati spiritus hereditatem discipulo dereliquit, ut una melotide heres donatus fluuios sisteret, Iordanem reuocaret in fontem, regum exercitus pasceret in deserto et potum sitientibus ministraret?

Those complaining, those murmuring, those transgressing, then, the Lord did not desert, but followed. What shall I say of Elijah and Elisha, to whom, as they walked through the desert, horses from heaven and a fiery chariot came? How was Elijah forsaken, who was invited by Christ? How forsaken on earth, who was caught up to heaven? How needy and naked and empty, who left to his disciple the inheritance of a double spirit, so that the heir, endowed with a single sheepskin, stopped rivers, called the Jordan back to its source, fed the armies of kings in the desert and supplied drink to the thirsty?

36.58.7CSEL 64:116

ad eius arbitrium de caelo profluebant pocula, in terris mortui resurgebant. quomodo erectus est Heliseus, qui cum Syrorum uallatus esset exercitu, ut captiuus raperetur ad regem, dicente Giezi seruo: domine, quid faciemus? ait: noli timere, quoniam nobiscum plures sunt quam cum illis. et dixit: domine, aperi oculos eius ut uideat? et aperti sunt oculi illius

At his will drinks flowed down from heaven, and the dead rose on earth. How was Elisha lifted up, who, when he was surrounded by the army of the Syrians, to be carried off captive to the king, and his servant Gehazi said: "Lord, what shall we do?" said: "Do not fear, for those with us are more than those with them." And he said: "Lord, open his eyes that he may see." And his eyes were opened

36.58.8CSEL 64:116–117

et uidit montem et omnia in circuitu equis innumeris et caelestibus repleta legionibus. Paulus quoque, qui dixit periculis in mari, periculis in deserto se esse iactatum, tamen ipse testificatus est dicens: si deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? ergo ille sic derelictus et destitutus ab hominibus apud deum abundat et profluit. nam et Helias destitutus erat ita, ut diceret: domine, accipe animam meam, et tamen uigebat apud deum, ut ipsis esset regibus uirtute terribilis.

and he saw the mountain and everything around full of countless horses and heavenly legions. Paul too, who said he had been tossed about by perils at sea, perils in the desert, yet himself testified, saying: "If God is for us, who is against us?" He, then, so forsaken and destitute among men, abounds and overflows with God. For Elijah too was so destitute that he said: "Lord, take my soul," and yet he was so strong with God that he was terrible in power to kings themselves.

Explanation 36, chapter 59

36.59.1CSEL 64:117

Quomodo iuuenis Dauid hoc potuit comprehendere? iuuenis enim magis temporalia quam aeterna considerat, quia aetas ea propendit ad uitia. sed sunt quidam in iuuentute senes et alii iuuenes in senectute. sunt, inquam, uiri quorum animi senilium grauitate censentur, in quibus aetas senectutis sit uita inmaculata, in quibus uigeat incana prudentia, qualis erat Hieremias, qui cum se iuuenem contuitu memoraret aetatis et per iuuentutem excusaret, quod praedicandi impar officio uideretur, ait illi dominus: noli dicere quia iuuenis sum ego, quia ad omnes quoscumque misero te abibis.

How could David as a young man understand this? For a young man considers temporal things rather than eternal, since that age leans toward vices. But some are old in youth and others young in old age. There are, I say, men whose minds are judged by the gravity of the old, in whom "the age of old age is a spotless life," in whom white-haired prudence flourishes; such was Jeremiah, who, when he spoke of himself as young in view of his age and excused himself through his youth, because he seemed unequal to the office of preaching, the Lord said to him: "Do not say, I am young, for to all to whom I send you, you shall go."

36.59.2CSEL 64:117

ita iuuenem non putauit quem aptum prophetiae gratiae iudicabat. talis ergo iuuenis fuit Dauid, qui renouatus esset et refloruisset, ut ipse dixit, uelut aquilae iuuentus sua. sic ergo intellegi oportet: iuuenis fui, sed sanctificatus, sed propheta in gentibus positus, qui iam possem regni caelestis sacramenta cognoscere et uera praemia considerare iustitiae, sed non uidi iustum derelictum. postea quoque alibi et usu roboratus et munere adquisiui incrementa sapientiae; eadem circa iustum uisa est mihi gratia permanere.

So he did not think him young whom he judged fit for the grace of prophecy. Such a young man, then, was David, who had been renewed and had flourished again, as he himself said, like the youth of the eagle. It must be understood thus, then: I was young, but sanctified, but set as a prophet among the nations, who could already know the mysteries of the heavenly kingdom and consider the true rewards of justice; but I did not see the just man forsaken. Afterwards too, elsewhere, strengthened both by experience and by gift, I acquired increases of wisdom; the same grace seemed to me to remain toward the just man.

Explanation 36, chapter 60

36.60.1CSEL 64:117

Explanauimus, ut potuimus, quomodo dixerit: iuuenis fui; sed quomodo addiderit: etenim senui consideremus. bona iuuentus, sed melior senectus; qui enim usque in finem perseuerauerit, hic saluus erit. unde non perfunctorie de patriarcha Abraham dictum est, quod nutritus esset in senectute bona. et Iohannes senex coepit scribere euangelium uel epistulas.

We have explained as we could how he said: "I was young"; but let us consider how he added: "for I have grown old." Good is youth, but better old age; for "he who perseveres to the end will be saved." Hence it is not lightly said of the patriarch Abraham that he was nourished in a good old age. And John began to write the gospel or the epistles as an old man.

36.60.2CSEL 64:117–118

qui cum refugeret apostolum se scribere, seniorem scripsit nec minor est aestimatus, cui cygnea quaedam suppeteret gratia senectutis. ipse uas electionis dominicae scribens ad Philemonem ait: cum sis talis ut Paulus senex, nunc autem et uinctus Christi Iesu, obsecro te pro meo filio, quem genui in uinculis, Onesimo. uolens itaque illi plurimum deferre seniori Paulo eum, non iuueni

He, though he avoided writing himself as apostle, wrote himself as the elder, and was not thought less, since a kind of swan-like grace of old age was at hand for him. The vessel of the Lord's election himself, writing to Philemon, says: "Since you are such as Paul the old man, and now also a prisoner of Christ Jesus, I beseech you for my son, whom I have begotten in chains, Onesimus." Wishing, then, to show him the greatest deference, he compared him to the old Paul, not the young,

36.60.3CSEL 64:118

comparauit et ibi se senem est gloriatus, ubi iam in uinculis tenebatur. et uidete distantiam: adulescens significatus est in alterius passione, senex in sua; ibi ut adulescens, quia Iudaeorum uestimenta seruabat, hic senex, ubi sui corporis exuuias exuebat. denique et Petrus ibi senex dicitur, ubi certamen est passionis: cum iunior, inquit, esses, cingebas te et ambulabas ubi uolebas; cum autem senueris, extendes manus tuas et alius te cinget et ducet quo tu non uis.

and gloried in being old where he was already held in chains. And see the difference: he is described as a young man in another's passion, as an old man in his own; there as a young man, because he guarded the clothes of the Jews, here as an old man, when he was putting off the spoils of his own body. Indeed Peter too is called old there where the contest of the passion is: "When you were younger," he says, "you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands and another will gird you and lead you where you do not wish."

36.60.4CSEL 64:118

hoc autem dixit significans qua morte clarificaturus esset deum. ante certamen iunior dicitur, in certamine senex qui omne certamen impleuerit. hoc ergo dicit Dauid ille in iuuentute bellator, in senectute pacificus: iuuenis, inquit, fui, sed nolo me adhuc iuuenem putes; etenim senui et non uidi iustum derelictum nec semen eius quaerens panem.

"This he said signifying by what death he would glorify God." Before the contest he is called younger; in the contest, old, one who has completed every contest. This, then, is what David, a warrior in youth, a peacemaker in old age, says: "I was young," he says, "but I do not want you to think me still young; for I have grown old, and I have not seen the just man forsaken nor his seed seeking bread."

Explanation 36, chapter 61

36.61.1CSEL 64:118

Quod est semen iusti? Abrahae dictae sunt promissiones et semini eius. non dicit et seminibus tamquam in multis, sed sicut in uno: et semini tuo, quod est Christus. audi iusti semen: filioli mei, quos ego parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis. et nunc si quis ex gentibus ueniens sermonem audiat nostrum et dominus iuuare dignetur, ut formetur

What is the seed of the just man? "The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say 'and to seeds,' as of many, but as of one: 'and to your seed,' which is Christ." Hear the seed of the just man: "My little children, with whom I am in labor until Christ be formed in you." And now, if anyone coming from the Gentiles hears our word and the Lord deigns to help, so that

36.61.2CSEL 64:118–119

Christus in animo eius, quo partus fidei ferat, semen ei Christus erit [illic in utroque]. Abraham itaque et generationis pater erat secundum carnem et is, qui uerbum domini in pectoribus iustorum primus infuderit. et ideo hoc semen Abrahae panes istos, quibus praebeatur corporalis alimonia, non requirit, quia habet panem iustitiae qui descendit de caelo. sicut enim negantur filii Abrahae qui opera Abrahae non fecerint, ita semen Abrahae sunt et inter filios recipiuntur qui opus eius effecerint. uerum Abrahae semen Helias, cui angelus alimenta praebebat et in uirtute escae illius quadraginta dierum curriculis ambulabat.

Christ is formed in his soul, so that he bears the fruit of faith, Christ will be his seed. Abraham, then, was both father of the race according to the flesh and he who first poured the word of the Lord into the hearts of the just. And so this seed of Abraham does not seek those loaves by which bodily nourishment is supplied, since it has the bread of justice that came down from heaven. For just as those are denied to be sons of Abraham who have not done the works of Abraham, so those are the seed of Abraham and received among his sons who have done his work. A true seed of Abraham was Elijah, to whom an angel gave food, and in the strength of that food he walked for forty days.

36.61.3CSEL 64:119

non requirebat istam corporis huius alimoniam uerum semen Abrahae, cui panes deferebantur de caelo; denique corui ei cotidianum conuiuium ministrabant. ita indiguus erat omnium, ut nihil haberet suum, et mittebatur ut uictum aliis largiretur. uerum semen Danihel, cui inter leones posito aeria fercula per Habacuc prophetam referta messorum epulis uehebantur.

The true seed of Abraham did not seek this nourishment of the body, he to whom loaves were brought from heaven; indeed ravens served him a daily banquet. He was so needy of all things that he had nothing of his own, and he was sent to bestow food on others. A true seed was Daniel, to whom, placed among the lions, dishes filled with the reapers' meal were carried through the air by the prophet Habakkuk.

36.61.4CSEL 64:119

est ergo panis angelorum quem manducauit homo; sic enim scriptum est: panem angelorum manducauit homo. hic est panis de quo dixit Dauid: dominus pascit me et nihil mihi deerit. in loco uiridi ibi me collocauit, super aquam refectionis educauit me. bonus Dauid docuit me panem angelorum et ipse me docuit aquam refectionis. haec refectio spiritalis est, haec refectio requies est mentis internae. bona aqua quae peccatum lauat, mundat interna.

It is, then, the bread of angels that man ate; for so it is written: "Man ate the bread of angels." This is the bread of which David said: "The Lord feeds me and I shall lack nothing. In a green place there he has set me; beside the water of refreshment he has brought me up." Good David has taught me the bread of angels, and he himself has taught me the water of refreshment. This refreshment is spiritual; this refreshment is rest of the inner mind. Good is the water that washes sin and cleanses within.

36.61.5CSEL 64:119–120

quae sit aqua haec, audiamus: si quis, inquit, sitit, ueniat ad me et bibat. qui credit in me, sicut dicit scriptura, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. hocautem dicebat de spiritu quem incipiebant accipere qui credituri erant in eum. ergo nec pane hoc nec aqua refectionis indiget iustus, cui spiritus sanctus est requies et refectio.

Let us hear what this water is: "If anyone thirsts," he says, "let him come to me and drink. He who believes in me, as Scripture says, rivers of living water will flow from his belly. This he said of the Spirit, which those who were to believe in him were beginning to receive." So the just man does not lack this bread or the water of refreshment, for whom the Holy Spirit is rest and refreshment.

Explanation 36, chapter 62

36.62.1CSEL 64:120

Quomodo autem poterit indigere qui tota die miseretur et faenerat? quid est quod faenerat iustus? non aes, non ferrum, non plumbum, sed argentum igni examinatum. hoc defert ad mensam domini et diuidit requirentibus, cui unam, cui duas, cui quinque mnas cotidie diuidit, et numquam deficit.

And how can he be in need who "all day long has mercy and lends"? What is it that the just man lends? Not bronze, not iron, not lead, but silver tried by fire. This he brings to the Lord's table and distributes to those who seek it, to one one mina, to another two, to another five he distributes daily, and never runs short.

36.62.2CSEL 64:120

sed faenerationem audiuimus in lege reprehensam dicente Moyse non faenerabis. duplex est faeneratio, una pecuniae, altera gratiae. diuide utramque, quia scriptum est: si recte offeras, non recte diuidas, peccasti; quiesce. et tu recte diuide, ne pecces. ipse Moyses doceat te diuidere qui ammonuit recte diuidendum, ut sequaris quod Abel, qui recte diuisit, fugias quod Cain erat; parricida erat qui recte diuidere nesciebat. diuidit ergo spiritus sanctus

But we have heard lending at interest blamed in the law, when Moses says: "You shall not lend at interest." Lending is twofold: one of money, the other of grace. Distinguish the two, for it is written: "If you offer rightly but do not divide rightly, you have sinned; be still." You too, divide rightly, lest you sin. Let Moses himself teach you to divide, who warned that one must divide rightly, so that you may follow what Abel was, who divided rightly, and flee what Cain was; he was a fratricide who did not know how to divide rightly. So the Holy Spirit divides

36.62.3CSEL 64:120

diuisiones, qui operatur omnia diuidens singulis prout uult. ille prout uult, tu prout potes, prout ingenio uales. diuide quando lex de pecunia dicat, quando de gratia. dixit enim tibi: faenerabis gentibus, cuius dominus usuras exigit, tu autem non mutuaberis. est et pecunia faenoris, est et gratia, cuius dominus usuras exigit; pecunia faenoris aes habet, gratia fidem confert. faenerato ergo fidem gentibus, ut tibi abundet gratia;

the divisions, who works all things, dividing to each as he wills. He as he wills, you as you can, as you are able by your talent. Distinguish when the law speaks of money and when of grace. For it said to you: "You shall lend to the nations," whose interest the Lord requires, "but you shall not borrow." There is money for lending and there is grace, whose interest the Lord requires; money for lending holds bronze, grace confers faith. Lend faith, then, to the nations, so that grace may abound to you;

36.62.4CSEL 64:120–121

tu autem noli mutuari quasi indiguus, sed quasi diues et locuples faenerato. faenerauit Petrus, faenerauit Paulus, faenerauit Iohannes Euangelista uel uterque et non indiguit, hoc est: faenerarunt pecuniam Christi, non faenerarunt pecunias ad usuram. faenera ergo et noli desistere faenerare. audis quid dicat scriptura: tota die miseretur et faenerat? iustus per diem faenerat, auarus in nocte; gratia enim lucis est, auaritia autem usura tenebrarum est. et ideo semen faenerantis fidem in benedictione erit, habens utique praemium benedictionis.

but do not borrow as one in need; lend as one rich and wealthy. Peter lent, Paul lent, John the Evangelist lent, or both Johns, and did not lack; that is, they lent the money of Christ, they did not lend money at usury. Lend, then, and do not cease lending. Do you hear what Scripture says: "All day long he has mercy and lends"? The just man lends by day, the greedy man by night; for grace belongs to light, but avarice is the usury of darkness. And so the seed of one who lends faith will be in blessing, having indeed the reward of blessing.

Explanation 36, chapter 63

36.63.1CSEL 64:121

Declina a malo et fac bonum et inhabita in saecula saeculorum. quoniam dominus amat iudicium et non derelinquet sanctos, in aeternum conseruabuntur; iniusti autem punientur et semen impiorum peribit. iusti hereditate possidebunt terram et inhabitabunt in saeculum saeculi super eam. his uersiculis demonstrat propheta, quod pertineamus ad dominum et ipse arbiter cogitationum operationumque nostrarum sit spectans merita singulorum, qui nihil sine iudicio agit, sed malos et bonos actus iudicio discernit.

"Turn aside from evil and do good, and dwell for ever and ever. For the Lord loves judgment and will not forsake his saints; they will be preserved for ever; but the unjust will be punished, and the seed of the ungodly will perish. The just will possess the land by inheritance and will dwell upon it for ever and ever." By these verses the prophet shows that we belong to the Lord and that he is the judge of our thoughts and actions, looking on the merits of each, who does nothing without judgment, but distinguishes evil and good acts by judgment.

36.63.2CSEL 64:121

declinandum ergo est a malo et faciendum bonum. ne bona malaque confundas, prius est ut crimine careas, postea ut innocentiae fructum deferas, quo possis esse perpetuus. noli putare, quod deum tua peccata praetereant; sic enim plerique labuntur. ipse uniuersa cernit et damnat et impiorum semen exterminat, semen utique non corporalis generationis, sed mentis internae et impietatis successionem.

One must, then, turn aside from evil and do good. Lest you confuse good and evil, first you must be free of crime, afterwards bring the fruit of innocence, so that you can be everlasting. Do not think that your sins escape God; for so many slip. He sees all and condemns, and exterminates the seed of the ungodly, the seed not of bodily generation but of the inner mind and the succession of ungodliness.

36.63.3CSEL 64:121

nam utique Iob de semine Esau genitus scripturae testificatione signatur. quomodo ergo semen Esau periit in Iob, cum tantus iste uir fuerit, ut uenturum in terras dominum praeuideret, qui cetum istius saeculi diabolum subiugaret? ergo hoc quaeritur, ne malitia transfundatur in posteros.

For indeed Job is marked by the testimony of Scripture as born of the seed of Esau. How, then, did the seed of Esau perish in Job, when he was so great a man that he foresaw the Lord coming to earth, who would subdue the devil, the sea monster of this world? What is sought, then, is that malice not be passed on to descendants.

36.63.4CSEL 64:121–122

hoc per baptismatis sacramentum Christus operatur, ut exuat unusquisque quod natus est, induat quod renatus, fiat non familiae heres, sed gratiae, ut perpetuum domicilium habitationis aeternae sibi possit adquirere. qui autem habitare meruerit in saeculum saeculi, et ipse honorificabit deum in saecula saeculorum.

This Christ works through the sacrament of baptism, so that each one puts off what he was born and puts on what he was reborn, and becomes heir not of a family but of grace, so as to be able to acquire for himself a perpetual dwelling of eternal habitation. And he who has deserved to dwell for ever and ever will himself honor God for ever and ever.

Explanation 36, chapter 64

36.64.1CSEL 64:122

Ubi moralibus iustum instituit disciplinis, ut, qualis deo deberet esse, te doceret quaeue esset perfectae forma iustitiae, ad sapientiam et theoremata mentem uult eius assurgere et excitat eius intentionem, ut spectet intento corde caelestia et diuina intra se uoluat oracula atque ad ea quae complaceant deo suum informet

When he has trained the just man in moral disciplines, to teach you what he ought to be toward God and what the form of perfect justice is, he wants his mind to rise to wisdom and contemplation, and rouses his attention, so that he may look with intent heart on heavenly things and turn over within himself the divine oracles and shape his affection toward what pleases God;

36.64.2CSEL 64:122

affectum, sit meditatus in lege nec ulla eum domini mandata praetereant, motus diuini sacramenti cognoscat. denique abhinc uide in praeceptis sanctum prophetam assurgere: os iusti meditabitur sapientiam et lingua eius loquetur iudicium; lex dei eius in corde ipsius. nec damnabit, inquit, eum dominus, cum iudicabitur illi. expecta dominum et custodi uiam eius et exaltabit te, ut hereditate possideas terram; cum pereunt peccatores uidebis. uidi impium superexaltatum et eleuatum ultra cedros Libani et transiui, et ecce non erat, et quaesiui eum, et non est inuentus locus eius.

that he may meditate on the law, that none of the Lord's commands may escape him, and that he may know the movements of the divine mystery. Indeed from here see the holy prophet rise in his precepts: "The mouth of the just will meditate wisdom and his tongue will speak judgment; the law of his God is in his heart. Nor will the Lord condemn him when he is judged. Wait for the Lord and keep his way, and he will exalt you, so that you may possess the land by inheritance; when sinners perish you will see. I saw the ungodly exalted and lifted up beyond the cedars of Lebanon, and I passed by, and behold, he was not; and I sought him, and his place was not found."

36.64.3CSEL 64:122

superiora moralia, haec intellegibilia. quod est iusti os quod meditabitur sapientiam nisi interioris hominis? duo sunt enim homines in singulis, unus interior, alter exterior. interior cogitat quae mentis sunt, quae mentis sunt loquitur, exterior quae sunt corporis. tamen adueniens dominus utrumque coniunxit et duos condidit in uno homine, ne diuersis

The earlier things were moral, these are intelligible. What is the mouth of the just that will meditate wisdom but that of the inner man? For there are two men in each one, one inner, the other outer. The inner thinks the things of the mind and speaks the things of the mind; the outer the things of the body. Yet the Lord, coming, joined both and made the two into one man, so that they should not

36.64.4CSEL 64:122–123

sese inpugnent motibus, sed inuicem sibi uoluntatum suarum unitate socientur. ideo os iusti meditabitur sapientiam. iam enim et ipse exterior homo iusti in interioris hominis transfusus est disciplinam et in eius conformatus naturam ipsius exercet officia, ut caro meditetur quod mentis internae est. sed ne hoc incredibile tibi uideatur, audi dicentem, quia dominus Iesus transfigurauit corpus humilitatis nostrae, ut conforme fieret corpori gloriae suae.

attack each other with different movements but be joined to each other in the unity of their wills. Therefore the mouth of the just will meditate wisdom. For now even the outer man of the just has been transferred into the discipline of the inner man and, conformed to its nature, performs its offices, so that the flesh meditates what belongs to the inner mind. But lest this seem incredible to you, hear one saying that the Lord Jesus transfigured the body of our lowliness, so that it might be conformed to the body of his glory.

36.64.5CSEL 64:123

quis audeat dicere carnem sine peccato, carnem assumptam ex uirgine, carnem spiritu dei in Mariam superueniente generatam, quae in nullo discrepauit a sapientiae disciplinis, interioris hominis exsortem fuisse uirtutum nec in usus eius transire potuisse, cum supra hominem fuerit quod tactu eius sanabantur aegroti, caecis refundebatur lux, mortui resurgebant?

Who would dare to say that the flesh without sin, the flesh taken from the virgin, the flesh begotten by the Spirit of God coming upon Mary, which in nothing departed from the disciplines of wisdom, was without share in the virtues of the inner man and could not pass into its uses, when it was above man that by its touch the sick were healed, light was poured back to the blind, the dead rose?

36.64.6CSEL 64:123

competenter ergo scriptum est: os iusti meditabitur sapientiam, eo quod totus homo sit spiritalis, non utique terrenus. qualis enim terrenus, tales et terreni et qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes. abiit ergo terrenus, remansit caelestis. ideoque in tempora redemptionis referens propheta meditabitur dixit, licet unus e pluribus meditatur scripserit neque abhorreat a sensu, quia prophetarum spiritui futura pro praesentibus sunt. alii putant os pro mente dictum.

Fittingly, then, it is written: "The mouth of the just will meditate wisdom," because the whole man is spiritual, not earthly. For "as is the earthly, such are the earthly, and as is the heavenly, such are the heavenly." The earthly, then, has gone; the heavenly has remained. And so the prophet, referring to the times of redemption, said "will meditate," although one of many has written "meditates," nor does it depart from the sense, because to the spirit of the prophets future things are as present. Others think "mouth" is said for "mind."

36.64.7CSEL 64:123

pulchre autem istud exposuit nobis Salomon dicens: narratio iusti semper sapientia, stultus autem sicut luna inmutatur, id est: quod saepe uarietur nec in sua perseueret sententia et tamquam in tenebris lumen uideatur offundere nec tenere.

Finely Solomon explained this to us, saying: "The talk of the just is always wisdom, but the fool changes like the moon," that is, he often varies and does not persevere in his opinion, and seems as it were in darkness to spread light and not hold it.

Explanation 36, chapter 65

36.65.1CSEL 64:123–124

Sit ergo nobis semper in corde et ore meditatio sapientiae et lingua tua loquatur iudicium, lex dei tui in corde sit tuo. ideo tibi dicit scriptura: loqueris in illis sedens in domo, ambulans in uia, dormitans, resurgens. loquamur ergo dominum Iesum, quia ipse est sapientia, ipse est uerbum et uerbum dei. nam et hoc scriptum est: aperi os tuum uerbo dei. ipsum spirat qui sermones eius resonat et uerba meditatur.

Let there be, then, always in our heart and mouth the meditation of wisdom, and let your tongue speak judgment, let the law of your God be in your heart. So Scripture says to you: "You shall speak of them sitting in the house, walking on the way, lying down, rising up." Let us speak, then, of the Lord Jesus, for he is wisdom, he is the Word and the Word of God. For this too is written: "Open your mouth to the word of God." He breathes him who resounds his words and meditates his sayings.

36.65.2CSEL 64:124

ipsum semper loquamur. cum de sapientia loquimur, ipse est, cum de uirtute loquimur, ipse est, cum de iustitia loquimur, ipse est, cum de pace loquimur, ipse est, cum de ueritate et uita et redemptione loquimur, ipse est. aperi os tuum dei uerbo, scriptum est. tu aperi, ille loquitur. ideo dixit Dauid: audiam quid loquatur in me dominus et ipse dei filius dicit: aperi os tuum et adimplebo illud. sed non omnes ut Salomon possunt percipere sapientiae perfectionem, non omnes ut Daniel;

Let us always speak of him. When we speak of wisdom, it is he; when we speak of virtue, it is he; when we speak of justice, it is he; when we speak of peace, it is he; when we speak of truth and life and redemption, it is he. "Open your mouth to the word of God," it is written. You open, he speaks. So David said: "I will hear what the Lord speaks in me," and the Son of God himself says: "Open your mouth and I will fill it." But not all can grasp the perfection of wisdom as Solomon did, not all as Daniel;

36.65.3CSEL 64:124

omnibus tamen pro possibilitate infunditur spiritus sapientiae, sed omnibus qui fideles sunt. si credas, habes spiritum sapientiae. ideo sapiens dicit: credidi, propter quod locutus sum. cum credideris, accipies loquendi gratiam. et qui credit redimitur et qui orat redimitur, si pie intendat orationibus et in oratione assiduus sit, diem praeueniat, noctem frequentet, solis matutinis occurrat, ut ante ipse inluminetur a Christo quam terra solis exortu. et qui psallit redimitur et qui compungitur redimitur.

yet the spirit of wisdom is poured into all according to their capacity, but into all who are faithful. If you believe, you have the spirit of wisdom. So the wise man says: "I believed, therefore I spoke." When you have believed, you will receive the grace of speaking. And he who believes is redeemed, and he who prays is redeemed, if he applies himself devoutly to prayers and is assiduous in prayer, anticipates the day, frequents the night, meets the morning sun, so as to be enlightened by Christ before the earth by the sunrise. And he who sings psalms is redeemed, and he who is pricked to compunction is redeemed.

Explanation 36, chapter 66

36.66.1CSEL 64:124

Ideo meditare semper, loquere quae dei sunt, sedens in domo. domum possumus accipere ecclesiam, possumus domum accipere interiorem in nobis, ut intra nos loquamur. sedent iudices in Hierusalem, sederunt sedes in iudicio, sedit etiam iudicum consilium et libri aperti sunt. propheta dicit: et tu cum consilio omnia fac. cum consilio de factis tuis iudica, cum

So meditate always, speak the things of God, sitting in the house. We can take the house as the church; we can take it as the inner house in us, so that we speak within ourselves. Judges sit in Jerusalem; thrones sat in judgment; the council of judges sat too, and the books were opened. The prophet says: "And do all things with counsel." With counsel judge your deeds, with

36.66.2CSEL 64:124–125

consilio uinum bibe, cum consilio loquere, ut effugias peccatum, ne incidas per multiloquium. sedens loquere tecum quasi qui iudices. in uia loquere, ne umquam uaces. in uia loqueris, si in Christo loquaris, quia uia Christus est. in uia loquere tibi, loquere Christo. audi quomodo illi loquaris: uolo, inquit, uiros in omni loco orare leuantes puras manus suas sine ira et disceptatione. loquere, o homo, dormitans, ne tibi somnus mortis obrepat.

counsel drink wine, with counsel speak, so that you escape sin and do not fall through much speaking. Sitting, speak with yourself as one who judges. On the way speak, so that you are never idle. You speak on the way if you speak in Christ, for the way is Christ. On the way speak to yourself, speak to Christ. Hear how you should speak to him: "I want men," he says, "to pray in every place, lifting up pure hands, without anger and dispute." Speak, O man, when lying down, lest the sleep of death steal upon you.

36.66.3CSEL 64:125

audi quomodo dormitans loquaris: si dedero somnum oculis meis et palpebris meis dormitationem, donec inueniam locum domino, tabernaculum deo Iacob. uince naturam diligentia, exclude corporis somnum. naturam nobis formare non possumus, possumus diligentiam. homo erat Dauid, indulgebat aliquid et somno per noctem, sed excludebat somnum lauans per singulas noctes lectum suum et lacrimis inrigans stratum suum.

Hear how you should speak when lying down: "If I give sleep to my eyes and slumber to my eyelids, until I find a place for the Lord, a tabernacle for the God of Jacob." Overcome nature by diligence, shut out the sleep of the body. We cannot form our nature for ourselves; we can our diligence. David was a man; he indulged somewhat in sleep at night, but he shut out sleep, washing his bed every night and watering his couch with tears.

36.66.4CSEL 64:125

ideo memor erat in stratu suo semper domini sui et in ipso meditabatur, ut diluculum praeueniret et in tenebris ei inlucesceret Christus dicens: surge qui dormis. non in omnibus haec gratia est, sed potest esse et in pluribus diligentia. ne igitur expectes, ut te excitet Christus, sed potius Christum excita. excitat eum qui de ipso dormitans cogitat. si tu illum excitaueris, et ipse te excitabit a somno, resuscitabit a morte dicens tibi: exurge a mortuis.

So he always remembered his Lord on his bed and meditated on him, so as to anticipate the dawn and that Christ might shine on him in the darkness, saying: "Rise, you who sleep." This grace is not in all, but diligence can be in more. Do not wait, then, for Christ to rouse you, but rather rouse Christ. He rouses him who thinks of him while lying down. If you rouse him, he too will rouse you from sleep, raise you from death, saying to you: "Arise from the dead."

36.66.5CSEL 64:125–126

cum surges ergo uel resurges, ipsum loquere, ut impleas quod iuberis. audi quomodo te Christus excitet. anima tua dicit: uox fratris mei pulsat ad ianuam et Christus ait: aperi mihi, soror mea sponsa. audi quomodo tu exsuscites Christum. anima dicit: adiuraui uos, filiae Hierusalem, si suscitaueritis et resuscitaueritis caritatem. caritas Christus est. audi etiam quomodo dormiens loquaris: ego dormio et cor meum uigilat. haec communiter; attolle nunc paulo altius mentem tuam.

When you rise, then, or rise again, speak of him, so that you fulfil what you are commanded. Hear how Christ rouses you. Your soul says: "The voice of my brother knocks at the door," and Christ says: "Open to me, my sister, my bride." Hear how you rouse Christ. The soul says: "I adjure you, daughters of Jerusalem, if you rouse and rouse again love." Love is Christ. Hear also how you speak while sleeping: "I sleep and my heart keeps watch." These things in common; now lift your mind a little higher.

Explanation 36, chapter 67

36.67.1CSEL 64:126

Loquere sedens in domo, in hac terrestri domo huius habitationis quae dissoluitur, in qua peregrinamur a domino. in corpore enim isto positi dum superuestire magis quam expoliare nos uolumus, exulamus a Christo et grauiter ingemescimus. in hac sedens ergo confitere peccata tua, quia sedisti et non stetisti et non dixisti:

Speak sitting in the house, in this earthly house of our dwelling which is dissolved, in which we are exiles from the Lord. For placed in this body, while we wish to be clothed over rather than stripped, we are exiled from Christ and groan heavily. Sitting in this, then, confess your sins, because you sat and did not stand and did not say:

36.67.2CSEL 64:126

stantes erant pedes nostri in atriis Hierusalem. loquere magis et noli occultare delicta, loquere sedens, ut audias dicentem: surgite, postquam sederitis, qui manducatis panem doloris. loquere in uia ambulans, id est carpens uitae istius cursum. hic loquere, ne illic ommutescas, sicut ille ommutuit qui angelo Christi ante non credidit, postea tamen cum credidisset uocem recepit.

"Our feet were standing in the courts of Jerusalem." Speak rather and do not hide your offenses; speak sitting, so that you may hear one saying: "Rise, after you have sat, you who eat the bread of sorrow." Speak walking on the way, that is, running the course of this life. Speak here, lest you become dumb there, as he became dumb who did not at first believe the angel of Christ, yet afterwards, when he had believed, recovered his voice.

36.67.3CSEL 64:126

loquere dormiens et quiescens, consepultus in Christo, ut cum ipso in nouitate uitae resurgas. loquere etiam sepultus in tumulo, sicut loquebantur animae sanctorum de mortis petentes auctore uindictam: usque quo, domine sanctus et uerus, non iudicas et uindicas sanguinem nostrum? loquere postremo, cum surgis, sicut docuit ille qui dixit:

Speak sleeping and resting, buried with Christ, so that you may rise with him in newness of life. Speak even buried in the tomb, as the souls of the saints spoke, asking vengeance from the author of death: "How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not judge and avenge our blood?" Speak, lastly, when you rise, as he taught who said:

36.67.4CSEL 64:126–127

ego dormiui et quieui et resurrexi, quoniam dominus suscipiet me. et illic ergo os iusti meditabitur sapientiam, donec ad sublimiora tabernaculi secreta, caelestis ac sacrae plena iocunditatis atque laetitiae, ipse perueniat, quemadmodum scriptura nos docuit dicente Dauid: haec recordatus sum et effudi super me animam meam, quoniam ingrediar in locum tabernaculi admirabilis usque ad domum dei, in uoce exultationis et confessionis, sonitus epulantis. ergo et sedentes in hac corporea domo et egressi hinc atque ambulantes in uia cum rapimur, si meremur, obuiam Christo et dormientes loquemur.

"I slept and rested and rose again, for the Lord will take me up." There too, then, the mouth of the just will meditate wisdom, until he reaches the more sublime secrets of the tabernacle, full of heavenly and sacred joy and gladness, as Scripture taught us when David said: "These things I remembered and poured out my soul upon me, for I shall go into the place of the wonderful tabernacle, even to the house of God, with the voice of exultation and confession, the sound of one feasting." So, both sitting in this bodily house and having gone out from here and walking on the way, when we are caught up, if we deserve it, to meet Christ, even sleeping we shall speak.

Explanation 36, chapter 68

36.68.1CSEL 64:127

Accipe tertiam ἀναγωγήν, qua se anima eleuat iusti. est enim quidam spiritalis somnus intellegendus, de quo Salomon ait: si enim sedeas, sine timore sedebis, si dormias, suauiter requiesces; et non timebis pauorem qui superuenit tibi neque impetus impiorum superuenientes tibi. cum suauitate requiesces et pauorem et superuenientes impiorum impetus non timebis, si lingua tua loquatur iudicium dei et semper illud ante oculos habeas, ut peccato locum nullum relinquas et noueris, quod delicti pretium supplicii retributione soluetur.

Take a third ascent (anagoge), by which the soul of the just man lifts itself. For there is a kind of spiritual sleep to be understood, of which Solomon says: "For if you sit, you will sit without fear; if you sleep, you will rest sweetly; and you will not fear the terror that comes upon you, nor the attacks of the ungodly coming upon you." You will rest with sweetness and not fear the terror and the attacks of the ungodly coming upon you, if your tongue speaks God's judgment and you always have it before your eyes, so that you leave no place to sin and know that the price of offense will be paid by the requital of punishment.

36.68.2CSEL 64:127

ipse enim hoc in nonagesimo interpretatus est psalmo dicens: non timebis a timore nocturno et a sagitta uolante per diem, a negotio perambulante in tenebris, ab occursu et daemonio meridiano. cadent a latere tuo mille et dena milia a dextris tuis, ad te autem non adpropinquabit; uerumtamen oculis tuis considerabis et retributionem peccatorum uidebis.

For he himself explained this in the ninetieth psalm, saying: "You will not fear the terror of the night nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the business that walks in darkness, nor the attack and the noonday demon. A thousand will fall at your side and ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you; yet with your eyes you will look and see the requital of sinners."

36.68.3CSEL 64:127–128

iustus enim cum loquitur iudicium dei uel cum loquitur ipse quae iusta sunt et ueri plena iudicii, non cum iracundia loquitur, non ex animi maerentis afflictione, non ex dolore, non ex aliqua passione, sed loquitur ex ueritate, loquitur ex aequitate, ut non propendat affectu, sed quae loquitur uero pendat examine; iudicat enim, quae dicenda sint uel non promenda. cui simile est illud: labia sapientium alligata sunt sensu, eo quod omnia quae locuntur uero sensui conuenire uideantur et sensus sui prudentia intellegant, quae loqui debeant uel tacere, ut quae silenda sunt cohibeant claustro quodam

For the just man, when he speaks God's judgment, or when he himself speaks what is just and full of true judgment, does not speak with anger, not from the affliction of a grieving mind, not from pain, not from any passion, but speaks from truth, speaks from equity, so that he does not lean by feeling but weighs what he says by a true balance; for he judges what is to be said or not to be brought out. Like this is that saying: "The lips of the wise are bound by sense," because all they say seems to agree with true sense, and by the prudence of their sense they understand what they ought to speak or keep silent, so that what must be kept silent they hold back with a kind of bar

36.68.4CSEL 64:128

nexuque labiorum, in his autem quae oporteat dici labiorum uincula resoluantur. merito ergo praemisit: os iusti meditabitur sapientiam; meditatio enim diuturna plenum poterit habere iudicium, quod loquetur iustus in tempore, cum ea quae perfecta sunt facie ad faciem uiderit; nunc enim de his quae non comprehendimus loqui uera non possumus. denique nec Paulus praesumpsit dicere, qui raptus in paradisum audiuit secreta caelestia, sed uolens non in his errare quae diceret ait: quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia dei et inuestigabiles uiae eius! nunc autem absolutus corpore forsitan inuestigabilium uiarum genera et iudicia eius, quae sicut abyssus multa sunt, comprehendit.

and binding of the lips, while in what ought to be said the bonds of the lips are loosed. Rightly, then, he put first: "The mouth of the just will meditate wisdom"; for long meditation can hold full judgment, which the just man will speak in its time, when he sees face to face what is perfect; for now we cannot speak true things about what we do not grasp. Indeed not even Paul dared to say, who, caught up into paradise, heard the heavenly secrets; but, wishing not to err in what he said, he said: "How unsearchable are the judgments of God and his ways past finding out!" But now, released from the body, perhaps he grasps the kinds of the unsearchable ways and his judgments, which are like a great abyss.

Explanation 36, chapter 69

36.69.1CSEL 64:128

Adhuc iustitiae forma describitur et augetur dicente scriptura: lex dei eius in corde ipsius et non subplantabuntur gressus eius. in corde iusti lex dei est. quae lex? non scripta, sed naturalis; iusto enim lex non est posita, sed iniusto. in corde eius lex est, non perfunctorie sicut in labiis Iudaeorum; corde enim creditur ad iustitiam. qui credit, et loquitur; qui autem loquitur, non continuo credit. denique non credidit populus, de quo dictum est:

Still the form of justice is described and increased, as Scripture says: "The law of his God is in his heart, and his steps will not be supplanted." In the heart of the just is the law of God. What law? Not written, but natural; for "the law is not laid down for the just man, but for the unjust." The law is in his heart, not superficially as on the lips of the Jews; for "with the heart one believes unto justice." He who believes also speaks; but he who speaks does not necessarily believe. Indeed the people did not believe of whom it was said:

36.69.2CSEL 64:128–129

populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me. si igitur gentes, cum ea quae legis sunt faciunt, ipsi sibi sunt lex cognoscentes quae sequi debeant uel cauere, quanto magis fidelis et iustus, qui ad imaginem et similitudinem dei uiuit, decora nouit et honesta decernere et uti legitimo quodam naturalis sapientiae gubernaculo, ne eius subplantentur uestigia sicut Esau, quem propter gulae auiditatem frater subplantauit, ut caderet, atque in mortem uestigia eius effudit!

"This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me." If, then, the Gentiles, when they do the things of the law, are a law to themselves, knowing what they should follow or avoid, how much more does the faithful and just man, who lives after the image and likeness of God, know how to discern the seemly and honorable and use a kind of lawful rudder of natural wisdom, lest his footsteps be supplanted like Esau's, whom his brother supplanted because of the greed of his gluttony, so that he fell, and poured out his footsteps into death!

Explanation 36, chapter 70

36.70.1CSEL 64:129

Quo magis iustus est quisque, eo magis illi insidiatur inimicus, et ideo ait scriptura: considerat peccator iustum et quaerit perdere eum; dominus autem non derelinquet eum in manibus eius nec damnabit eum, cum iudicabitur illi. uidens ergo peccator, quia iustus in ore suo loquitur et in corde meditatur sapientiam, quia in lingua sua iudicium loquitur, quia in corde suo legem domini custodit, mortem peccati ei conatur inferre, sed dominus tuetur eum.

The more just anyone is, the more the enemy lies in wait for him; and so Scripture says: "The sinner watches the just man and seeks to destroy him; but the Lord will not leave him in his hands nor condemn him when he is judged." So the sinner, seeing that the just man speaks with his mouth and meditates wisdom in his heart, that he speaks judgment with his tongue, that he keeps the law of the Lord in his heart, tries to bring on him the death of sin; but the Lord protects him.

36.70.2CSEL 64:129

et ideo non timeamus insidias peccatoris, quoniam deus pro nobis est. si ergo deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? propterea non derelinquet iustum suum deus nec damnabit eum, cum habuerit de ipso iudicium; uerus enim iudex est et ideo iustitia non potest periclitari. unde et Aquilas dixit: nec damnabit eum in iudicando eo, Symmachus: nec damnabit, cum iudicatur iustus.

And so let us not fear the sinner's plots, since God is for us. "If God, then, is for us, who is against us?" Therefore God will not forsake his just one nor condemn him when he holds judgment on him; for he is the true judge, and so justice cannot be endangered. Hence Aquila too said: "nor will he condemn him in judging him"; Symmachus: "nor will he condemn when the just man is judged."

Explanation 36, chapter 71

36.71.1CSEL 64:129

Sed quia Septuaginta uiri sic posuerunt: cum iudicabitur illi putamus quod ad illud respexerit, quia scriptum est: quoniam ipse dominus ueniet in iudicium. sed in quod iudicium? audi dicentem: tibi soli peccaui et malum coram te feci, ut iustificeris in sermonibus tuis et uincas, cum iudicaris.

But because the Seventy put it thus: "when he is judged," we think it looked to what is written: "For the Lord himself will come into judgment." But into what judgment? Hear one saying: "Against you only have I sinned and done evil before you, that you may be justified in your words and overcome when you are judged."

36.71.2CSEL 64:129–130

ideo ergo praebet se dominus audiendum, ut de se iudicetur, quo magis uincat. quomodo se praebeat, audi: populus meus, quid feci tibi aut in quo contristaui te aut quid molestus tibi fui? responde mihi. quia ex Aegypto eduxi te et de domo seruitutis libera te, et alibi: ego sum ego sum, qui deleo iniquitates tuas et memor non ero. tu autem memor esto et iudicemur.

So the Lord offers himself to be heard, to be judged, so as to overcome the more. Hear how he offers himself: "My people, what have I done to you, or in what have I grieved you, or how have I troubled you? Answer me. For I brought you out of Egypt and freed you from the house of slavery"; and elsewhere: "I am, I am he who blots out your iniquities and will not remember them. But you, remember, and let us be judged."

Explanation 36, chapter 72

36.72.1CSEL 64:130

Graue hoc iudicium, cum dominus de se postulat contra hominem iudicari. quid enim respondeas ei qui uniuersa tibi contulit, omnibus te praefecit, subiecit tibi Aegyptios ad quos hospes adueneras, insectantes postea mari mersit? ille tuos deleuit hostes atque subuertit, ille te creauit et condidit; ille suo sanguine te redemit, et tu tradis te, ut seruias eius inimico?

Heavy is this judgment, when the Lord asks to be judged about himself against man. For what will you answer him who has bestowed all things on you, set you over all, subjected to you the Egyptians to whom you had come as a guest, and afterwards drowned them in the sea when they pursued you? He destroyed and overthrew your enemies; he created and formed you; he redeemed you with his blood; and do you hand yourself over to serve his enemy?

36.72.2CSEL 64:130

ille tibi omnia peccata dimisit, et tu grauiora committis? uocat te: in iudicium ueniens quid responsurus es ei, qui nisi iterum tibi donet, peristi? ideoque uidens sanctus Dauid hac quadam moralitate dei amplius se grauari iudicium refugit, misericordiam poscit dicens: et ne intres in iudicium cum seruo tuo, quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens.

He has forgiven you all your sins, and do you commit graver ones? He calls you: coming into judgment, what will you answer him, without whose giving to you again you have perished? And so holy David, seeing that by this kind of moral dealing of God he is weighed down the more, flees judgment, asks mercy, saying: "And do not enter into judgment with your servant, for no one living will be justified in your sight."

36.72.3CSEL 64:130

confitetur se in tenebris sicut mortuum saeculi conlocatum. caute sicut mortuum saeculi dixit, non mortuum. non enim mortui saeculi sunt qui moriuntur in Christo, illi autem sunt mortui saeculi qui omnem uitam suam, quam uixerunt in saeculo, in interitu et morte constituunt. et ideo quasi desperatus ad remedium confugit dicens: cito exaudi me, domine, quia defecit spiritus meus. talis enim iudicii proposita sibi oblatione defecit, in quo examinanda ueritas foret potius quam misericordia conferenda.

He confesses that he has been placed in darkness like the dead of the world. Carefully he said "like the dead of the world," not "dead." For those who die in Christ are not the dead of the world; but those are the dead of the world who place their whole life, which they lived in the world, in ruin and death. And so, as one desperate, he flees to the remedy, saying: "Hear me quickly, O Lord, for my spirit has failed." For he failed when the offer of such a judgment was set before him, in which truth was to be examined rather than mercy conferred.

Explanation 36, chapter 73

36.73.1CSEL 64:130

Tamen tam pius est dominus, ut, etsi nemo iustificetur in conspectu eius uiuens — quis enim quamuis iustus non obnoxius est peccato aut cuius talis est uita, ut digna iudicetur dei similitudine? -, utique ad imaginem et similitudinem dei factus debeat sicut deus, qui sine peccato est, ita et is qui ad imaginem eius est esse sine peccato.

Yet the Lord is so loving that, even if no one living is justified in his sight (for who, however just, is not liable to sin, or whose life is such as to be judged worthy of God's likeness?), yet one made after the image and likeness of God ought, as God is without sin, so to be without sin as one who is after his image.

36.73.2CSEL 64:130–131

qua ergo dignus est poena, qui gratiam tantam dominicae operationis et similitudinem diuini decoris amisit? sed quia misericors est, etiamsi ipse se iudicio subiciat, iustum tamen non iudicat, sed iniustum. iusto parcit quasi condicionis fragilitate peccanti, iniustum punit, quasi qui detestetur ingratum. deinde etiamsi multa habeas opera iustitiae, noli esse inpatiens atque arrogans, qui praemia tibi iustitiae in hoc saeculo existimes flagitanda aut indigne tibi aduersa accidisse aliqua conqueraris. quamdiu enim uiuis, certamen tibi debetur, non praemium.

What punishment, then, does he deserve who has lost so great a grace of the Lord's working and the likeness of divine beauty? But because he is merciful, even if he subjects himself to judgment, he does not judge the just man, but the unjust. He spares the just man as one sinning through the frailty of his condition; he punishes the unjust as one who detests the ungrateful. Then, even if you have many works of justice, do not be impatient and arrogant, thinking that the rewards of justice should be demanded for you in this world, or complaining that some adversities have befallen you undeservedly. For as long as you live, a contest is owed you, not a reward.

Explanation 36, chapter 74

36.74.1CSEL 64:131

Expecta ergo uel auxiliatorem dominum uel remuneratorem et custodi uias eius. hoc est expectare, eius quem expectandum putas mandata conseruare. etsi conteraris, etsi affligaris, etsi aegritudine deficias, tamen expecta dominum; non te confundet spes.

"Wait, then," for the Lord as helper or as rewarder, "and keep his ways." This is to wait: to keep the commands of him you think you should wait for. Even if you are crushed, even if afflicted, even if you fail through sickness, yet wait for the Lord; hope will not confound you.

Explanation 36, chapter 75

36.75.1CSEL 64:131

Ueniet dominus et exaltabit te, ut hereditate possideas terram. liquet superiorem esse terram, non istam in ualle terrenam, sed illam quae est repromissionis aeternae, in qua quicumque constituitur exaltatur a domino.

The Lord will come "and exalt you, so that you may possess the land by inheritance." It is clear that the land is the higher one, not this earthly one in the valley, but that of the eternal promise, in which whoever is set is exalted by the Lord.

Explanation 36, chapter 76

36.76.1CSEL 64:131

Uidebis autem, cum pereunt peccatores. tunc enim iustorum remuneratio erit, cum iudicium fuerit de meritis impiorum. sed non uno genere pereunt peccatores. ante tibi pereunt, si eorum potentiam, (si) diuitias non mireris, si non te moueat, cum eos honoribus liberis amicis abundare cognoueris.

"But you will see when sinners perish." For then will be the reward of the just, when judgment has been given on the deserts of the ungodly. But sinners do not perish in one way only. They perish for you beforehand if you do not admire their power, (if) not their riches, if it does not move you when you learn that they abound in honors, children, friends.

36.76.2CSEL 64:131

haec enim saeculi sunt et saeculum saeculari subiacet malignitati et princeps mundi his qui sibi seruiunt fauet secundum illud: omnia tibi dabo, si procidens adoraueris me. quid quaeris ut ea tibi dentur, cum ipse impius qui dat in eis diutius esse non possit? transit etiam ipse: quomodo possunt non transire quae contulit? tu modo constantem animum gere, iustitiam tene, nemo te moueat, et uidebis nihil esse impium.

For these belong to the world, and the world lies subject to worldly malice, and the prince of the world favors those who serve him, according to that saying: "All these I will give you, if you fall down and worship me." Why do you seek that these be given you, when the ungodly one who gives them cannot remain long in them himself? He too passes away: how can the things he bestowed not pass? You, only keep a constant mind, hold to justice, let no one move you, and you will see that the ungodly man is nothing.

Explanation 36, chapter 77

36.77.1CSEL 64:131–132

Denique audi dicentem: uidi impium superexaltatum et eleuatum super cedros Libani et transiui, et ecce non erat. uidi eum in saeculo hoc, uidi oculis corporis, uidi etiam iactantem se et superexaltantem sermonibus suis, aestimantem se aliquid esse qui nihil est. quomodo se superexaltat? ponam, inquit, thronum meum super nubes et ero similis altissimo.

In short, hear one saying: "I saw the ungodly man exalted and lifted above the cedars of Lebanon, and I passed by, and behold, he was not." I saw him in this world, I saw him with the eyes of the body; I saw him boasting too and exalting himself with his words, thinking himself to be something when he is nothing. How does he exalt himself? "I will set my throne," he says, "above the clouds and I will be like the Most High."

36.77.2CSEL 64:132

exaltat se, ut uideas eum sicut cedros Libani superexaltatas. et ipsae altae sunt et in monte sunt altissimo; merito ergo superexaltatae sunt et superexaltatus uidetur impius, qui se in illo monte constituit de quo scriptum est: si habueritis fidem sicut granum sinapis, diceretis huic monti: tollere et iactare in mare. huic daemonio, inquit, a quo iste inuasus fuerat et oppressus quem miramini esse sanatum. ideo caritatem magis habetis in Christo quam potestatem in diabolo. uides cedrum in

He exalts himself, so that you see him like the cedars of Lebanon exalted. These too are high and stand on a very high mountain; rightly, then, they are exalted, and the ungodly man seems exalted who has set himself on that mountain of which it is written: "If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you would say to this mountain: be taken up and cast into the sea." "To this demon," he means, by whom this man had been invaded and oppressed whom you wonder to see healed. And so you have more love in Christ than power in the devil. You see a cedar on

36.77.3CSEL 64:132

monte altissimo superexaltatam, sed uento frangitur, sed igni exuritur, sed uetustate dissoluitur. ita est diues in saeculo; fulget quidem splendore quodam gratiae saecularis ut Libanus, nixus est mundi potentia, opibus et diuitiis exultat. uidetur tibi aliquid esse, antequam dicas: transiens uidebo. sicut enim Moyses animo et mente transiuit materialia et deum uidit, ita et tu, si transeas hinc, ad dei gratiam uestigium tuae mentis attollens

a very high mountain exalted, but it is broken by the wind, burned by fire, dissolved by age. So is the rich man in the world: he shines indeed with a kind of splendor of worldly favor like Lebanon, leans on the world's power, exults in wealth and riches. He seems to you to be something, before you say: "Passing over, I will see." For as Moses in mind and spirit passed beyond material things and saw God, so you too, if you pass from here, raising the step of your mind to God's grace,

36.77.4CSEL 64:132

uidebis eum nihil esse, qui in hac terra sibi potentissimus uidebatur. ideo animae tuae dicit, menti tuae dicit deus uerbum: ades huc a Libano, sponsa, ades huc a Libano; transibis et pertransibis. si transeas saecularia, pertransies ad paradisum. audi transeuntem: memento mei, domine, cum ueneris in regnum tuum; audi iterum pertranseuntem: amen amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso.

will see that he is nothing who seemed to himself most powerful on this earth. Therefore God the Word says to your soul, says to your mind: "Come here from Lebanon, bride, come here from Lebanon; you will pass and pass through." If you pass beyond worldly things, you will pass through to paradise. Hear one passing: "Remember me, Lord, when you come into your kingdom"; hear again one passing through: "Amen, amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise."

Explanation 36, chapter 78

36.78.1CSEL 64:132–133

Quid est: ecce non erat? in principio utique uerbum erat et qui uerbum uidet, qui particeps uerbi est, utique et ipse est, quia uerbum dei semper est et sermo qui de ipso est non est est et non, sed est et manet in eo qui sequitur deum. qui autem nescit uerbum, non est, quia non adhaeret ei qui dixit: ego sum qui sum. qui autem adhaeret ei unus spiritus est; ubi autem spiritus, et uita. ideo tibi dicit scriptura de deo: qui uiuificat mortuos et uocat ea quae non sunt tamquam ea quae sunt, hoc est: uocat gentes quae non erant tamquam populum suum qui erat; erant enim patres nostri qui erant electi dei.

What is "behold, he was not"? In the beginning, surely, the Word was, and he who sees the Word, who shares in the Word, himself also is, because the Word of God always is, and the speech that is from him is not "is and is not," but is and remains in him who follows God. But he who does not know the Word is not, because he does not cling to him who said: "I am who am." But he who clings to him is one spirit; and where the Spirit is, there is life. So Scripture says to you of God: "who gives life to the dead and calls the things that are not as though they were," that is, calls the nations which were not as his people which was; for our fathers were, who were God's chosen.

36.78.2CSEL 64:133

et alibi, ubi dicitur: cognouit dominus qui sunt ipsius, non cognoscit eos qui non sunt, et Esther ait: non des uirgam regni tui his qui non sunt. recte ergo iustus dicit: et transiui et ecce non erat, hoc est: uidi eum superexaltatum in saeculo, antequam considerarem quia nihil est saeculum; ubi autem transiui mente supra mundum, uidi quia iam non erat qui ante erat superexaltatus in hoc mundo.

And elsewhere, where it is said: "The Lord knows those who are his," he does not know those who are not; and Esther says: "Do not give your scepter to those who are not." Rightly, then, the just man says: "And I passed by, and behold, he was not"; that is: I saw him exalted in the world before I considered that the world is nothing; but when I passed in mind above the world, I saw that he who before was exalted in this world already was not.

Explanation 36, chapter 79

36.79.1CSEL 64:133

Et tu, si iustus es, transi a praesentibus ad ea quae futura sunt, et transibunt tibi praesentia. caelum et terra transibunt, uerba autem mea non praeteribunt. iusto ergo omnia transeunt. transit impius, similis uanitati est et dies eius sicut umbra praetereunt. nec solum praetereunt iusto praesentia, sed etiam cum ad ea quae sunt futura intenderit, iam ista praetereunt.

And you, if you are just, pass from present things to those that are to come, and present things will pass for you. "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." For the just man, then, all things pass. The ungodly man passes; he is like vanity and his days pass like a shadow. And not only do present things pass for the just man, but when he has turned his attention to things to come, these already pass.

36.79.2CSEL 64:133–134

uide quomodo iusto praesentia praeterierunt. utique temporibus Dauid prophetae synagoga erat, ecclesia ex gentibus non erat et idem futuris quasi praesentibus dicit: benedicite, gentes, deum nostrum, deinde supra ait: ascendit deus in iubilatione. transiuit perfidiae uentura tempora non aetate, sed mente et resurrectionem domini multo post saeculo futuram pia fidei deuotione celebrauit dicens: psallite deo nostro, psallite;

See how present things passed for the just man. Certainly in the times of the prophet David there was the synagogue; the church from the Gentiles did not exist; and yet he speaks of future things as present: "Bless our God, you nations"; then above he says: "God has gone up with jubilation." He passed over the times to come of faithlessness, not by age but by mind, and celebrated with the pious devotion of faith the Lord's resurrection, which was to come many ages later, saying: "Sing psalms to our God, sing psalms;

36.79.3CSEL 64:134

psallite regi nostro, psallite. quasi interesset ipsis Christi et ecclesiae nuptialis copulae sacramentis, ita tripudiat et gaudet. causam quoque celebritatis expressit dicens: regnauit dominus super omnem terram. ergo si nos praetereamus, et illa praeterisse quae futura sunt nobis uidentur, ut, si in nauigando terram praetereas, illam quoque uideas praeterire et quasi a te discedere. saepe nautae, maxime in tempestate, fugiunt terram et tamen, cum eam fugiant nauigantes, ipsa potius fugere uidetur a nauigantibus.

sing psalms to our King, sing psalms." As though present at the very mysteries of the marriage union of Christ and the church, he so dances and rejoices. He also expressed the cause of the celebration, saying: "The Lord has reigned over all the earth." So if we pass on, the things to come also seem to us to have passed, just as, if you pass the land in sailing, you see it too pass and, as it were, depart from you. Often sailors, especially in a storm, flee the land, and yet, while they flee it as they sail, it rather seems to flee from them.

36.79.4CSEL 64:134

et tu si fugias mundum hunc, et ipse te fugiet; si praetereas terram hanc, et ipsa te praeterit. et tu in mari hoc nauigas et in hoc saeculo fluctuas: fuge terram, saxa habet, lapides habet, sicut scriptum est: lapides de uia proicite. si festines per aerium hoc profundum ad portum diuinae uoluptatis, uidebis tibi haec omnia praeterisse. quid enim interest, utrum praeterierint an tibi ea iudices praeterisse?

And you, if you flee this world, it too will flee you; if you pass this land, it too passes you. You too are sailing on this sea and tossed on the waves in this world: flee the land, it has rocks, it has stones, as it is written: "Throw the stones out of the way." If you hasten through this airy deep to the harbor of divine pleasure, you will see that all these things have passed for you. For what difference does it make whether they have passed or you judge that they have passed for you?

Explanation 36, chapter 80

36.80.1CSEL 64:134

Est et alius impius qui uidetur exaltatus et eleuatus super cedros Libani et, si transeas, non erit nec locum eius inuenies. uide mihi scribam Iudaicum reddentem seriem ueterum scripturarum, sed non sequentem; audis quia labiis reddit, miraris ut doctum. interrogas quid sentiat; respondet secundum litteram, percurrit historiam.

There is also another ungodly man who seems exalted and lifted above the cedars of Lebanon, and, if you pass by, he will not be, nor will you find his place. See, I pray, the Jewish scribe reciting the series of the old Scriptures but not following it; you hear that he recites with his lips, you admire him as learned. You ask what he understands; he answers according to the letter, runs through the history.

36.80.2CSEL 64:134

superexaltatus tibi uidetur et eleuatus, si litteram cogites. transi ad intellegentiam spiritalem, quia lex spiritalis; uides illum nihil esse, tum dicis: uidi impium superexaltatum et transiui, et ecce non erat; et quaesiui eum, et non est inuentus locus eius. quaesiui eum ubi esse debuerat, ubi uita est; non illum inueni, non

He seems to you exalted and lifted up, if you think of the letter. Pass to the spiritual understanding, for the law is spiritual; you see that he is nothing; then you say: "I saw the ungodly man exalted and I passed by, and behold, he was not; and I sought him, and his place was not found." I sought him where he should have been, where life is; I did not find him; he was not

36.80.3CSEL 64:134–135

erat ibi ubi uita erat, quia mortuus erat, et ideo nec locus eius inuentus est. qui enim mortui locus, qui non erat nec fuit umquam? non enim fuit qui in littera erat; littera enim occidit, spiritus autem uiuificat. quaesiui ergo eum ut inuenirem; ille se non praebuit ut inueniretur, hoc est: ego eum uolui conuertere, ille se mihi praebere noluit ut conuerteretur. feci quae erant quaerentis, ille refugit ea quae esse debuerant reuertentis.

there where life was, because he was dead, and so neither was his place found. For what place has a dead man, who was not and never has been? For he who was in the letter did not exist; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. I sought him, then, to find him; he did not offer himself to be found; that is: I wanted to convert him; he would not offer himself to me to be converted. I did what belonged to one who seeks; he shunned what should have belonged to one who returns.

36.80.4CSEL 64:135

denique anima quae conuerti uult uerbum requirit et cum inuenerit dicit: tenui eum et non dimittam eum, hoc est dei filium, dei uerbum. iniustum autem, qui sanari noluit, quaesiui eum et non inueni, et ideo non illum imiteris.

In short, the soul that wishes to be converted seeks the Word, and when it has found him says: "I held him and will not let him go," that is, the Son of God, the Word of God. But the unjust man, who would not be healed, I sought, and did not find; and so do not imitate him.

Explanation 36, chapter 81

36.81.1CSEL 64:135

Custodi innocentiam et uide aequitatem. qui custodit innocentiam, aequitatem uidet, quoniam qui mundus est deum uidet, cuius uirga recta est et recta iustitia, ut auersetur eos qui declinauerint ad studia prauitatis. bona innocentia quae deum uidet. denique alii posuerunt: custodi perfectionem; perfectus est enim qui malitiam nescit nec dolum nouit.

"Keep innocence and see equity." He who keeps innocence sees equity, since he who is clean sees God, whose rod is a straight rod and straight justice, so as to turn away from those who have turned aside to pursuits of depravity. Good is innocence, which sees God. Indeed others have put: "Keep perfection"; for he is perfect who does not know malice nor know deceit.

36.81.2CSEL 64:135

ideo, inquit, custodi perfectionem, quia sunt reliquiae homini pacifico. reliquiae dicuntur hominis de corpore mortui, de eius exuuiis. ideo reliquiae, quia post mortem hominis uidentur superesse; supersunt enim quae seruantur ad resurrectionem. oportet enim hoc corruptibile induere incorruptionem et hoc mortale induere inmortalitatem.

"So keep perfection," he says, "for there are remains for the peaceable man." The remains of a man are said of the body of the dead, of his spoils. They are called remains because they seem to survive after a man's death; for what is kept for the resurrection survives. "For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

36.81.3CSEL 64:135

ergo magis reliquiae sunt homini spes resurrectionis et fides conuersionis et gratia dilectionis, quoniam impii non resurgunt in iudicium, uita autem iustorum nota est deo et iudicio domini comprobatur. huic loco pulchre illud conuenit: reliquiae secundum electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt.

So rather a man's remains are the hope of resurrection, the faith of conversion and the grace of love, since the ungodly do not rise in judgment, but the life of the just is known to God and approved by the Lord's judgment. To this place that saying is finely suited: "The remnant according to the election of grace has been saved."

Explanation 36, chapter 82

36.82.1CSEL 64:135–136

Iniusti autem disperibunt simul, reliquiae impiorum interibunt. iustorum reliquiae uirtutes sunt, impiorum reliquiae improbitas atque perfidia ac peccatum. ea delebuntur, ut non sint.

"But the unjust will perish together; the remains of the ungodly will be destroyed." The remains of the just are virtues; the remains of the ungodly are wickedness and faithlessness and sin. These will be blotted out, so as not to be.

Explanation 36, chapter 83

36.83.1CSEL 64:136

Salus autem iustorum a domino, non saeculo, non ab elemento; caelum et terra praeteribunt. non committo salutem meam caelo, quia et ipsum praeterit, quia de pluribus caelis dictum est: ipsi peribunt, tu autem permanes. deo soli committo qui permanet, qui potest donare peccata, ut protector meus sit in tempore tribulationis et adiuuet me et liberet me et eripiat me a peccatoribus iudicii sui tempore et saluum me faciat, quoniam speraui in eum. in ipsum solum speraui; non uult enim nos et sibi et alii seruire. qui ipsi soli seruit, liberatur, quoniam ipsi est laus, gloria, perpetuitas a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

"But the salvation of the just is from the Lord," not from the world, not from an element; "heaven and earth will pass away." I do not entrust my salvation to heaven, because it too passes, since it was said of the many heavens: "They will perish, but you remain." I entrust it to God alone, who remains, who can forgive sins, that he may be my protector in the time of tribulation and help me and free me and rescue me from sinners in the time of his judgment and save me, because I have hoped in him. In him alone I have hoped; for he does not want us to serve both himself and another. He who serves him alone is freed, for to him is praise, glory, eternity, from the ages and now and always and for all the ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 37, chapter 1

37.1.1CSEL 64:136

De paenitentia duos iam dudum scripsi libellos et iterum scribendum arbitror. primum, quia utile est uel cotidie ueniam delictorum precari, deinde, quoniam in illis duobus libellis adhortatio paenitentiae uel profectus est, si geratur, nunc autem, quemadmodum agi paenitentia debeat, exprimendum est; nihil enim prodest agere, nisi ita agatur ut oportet. in quo sanctus Dauid sequendum nobis proposuit magisterium, qui ideo mihi uidetur gustasse peccatum doceret quemadmodum peccatum posset aboleri. unde enim medicina nisi de uulnere sumpsit exordium? dum prima aetas generis humani docet alios quod sibi profuit et, quem-

I wrote two little books on repentance some time ago, and I think I must write again. First, because it is useful to pray for pardon of offenses even daily; then, because in those two books there is exhortation to repentance, or its progress if it is done, but now it must be set out how repentance ought to be done; for it is of no use to do it unless it is done as it ought to be. In this holy David has set before us a teaching to follow, who seems to me to have tasted sin so that he might teach how sin could be abolished. For from what did medicine take its beginning but from a wound? While the first age of the human race teaches others what profited it, and shows others how

37.1.2CSEL 64:136–137

admodum uulnus suum sanauerit, aliis ostendit, usus artem fecit et aegritudo magisterium. ipsa est enim prima et ualida secta medicinae, quam experientia, non coniectura formauit. ideoque ab experientia empirici primo medici sunt uocati et ex ea secta ceterae deriuatae sunt atque ab ea sucum quendam suae sumpsere uirtutis. quid autem est ad cohortationem paenitentiae ualidius quam quod sanctus propheta Dauid peccatorum nostrorum nos docuit paenitere? quis enim dedignetur humiliare se deo, cum rex se humiliauerit, aut quis dubitet affligere animam suam, cum propheta tantus afflixerit, soluens pretium lacrimarum pro redemptione peccati?

it healed its own wound, experience made the art and sickness the teaching. For this is the first and strong school of medicine, which experience, not conjecture, formed; and so from experience physicians were first called empirics, and from that school the others derived and took from it a kind of sap of their own strength. And what is stronger for exhortation to repentance than that the holy prophet David taught us to repent of our sins? For who would disdain to humble himself before God, when a king has humbled himself, or who would hesitate to afflict his soul, when so great a prophet afflicted his, paying the price of tears for the redemption of sin?

37.1.3CSEL 64:137

et quamuis toto scriptorum suorum corpore gerendae paenitentiae praecepta diffuderit — quis enim eius psalmus non medicamentum est conscientiae peccatricis, cum alibi, quemadmodum impulsus sit, alibi, quemadmodum conturbatus ostenderit, ut non solum quemadmodum sananda, sed etiam quemadmodum cauenda uulnera demonstraret et suo nos doceret exemplo? quis autem stare se credat, ubi lapsus est etiam fortior? —, tamen in tricesimo septimo psalmo maiorem uim doloris interni et lamentabilis deplorationis expressit.

And although he spread precepts for doing penance through the whole body of his writings (for which of his psalms is not a medicine for a sinning conscience, since in one he shows how he was pushed, in another how he was troubled, so as to show not only how wounds are to be healed but also how they are to be avoided, and teach us by his own example? And who would think himself standing, where even the stronger has fallen?), yet in the thirty-seventh psalm he expressed a greater force of inner grief and lamenting.

Explanation 37, chapter 2

37.2.1CSEL 64:137

Denique in exordio ipse nos titulus ammonet huiusmodi praecepta formari; sic enim legimus: in commemorationem, inquit, de die sabbati psalmus Dauid. plena enim est definitio paenitentiae commemoratio delictorum, ut unusquisque peccata sua uelut quodam cotidiani sermonis castiget flagello et commissa sibi flagitia condemnet. sic enim docemur dicente deo: dic iniquitates tuas, ut iustificeris, et apostolus ait: ore confessio fit ad salutem.

Indeed at the opening the title itself warns us that precepts of this kind are being formed; for so we read: "For remembrance," he says, "concerning the sabbath day, a psalm of David." For the full definition of repentance is the remembrance of offenses, so that each one may chastise his sins as with the whip of daily speech and condemn the shameful deeds he has committed. For so we are taught, when God says: "Tell your iniquities, that you may be justified," and the apostle says: "With the mouth confession is made unto salvation."

37.2.2CSEL 64:137–138

sed forte moueat, quia non dixit peccatorum commemorationem, sed de die sabbati aut, sicut alius habet, sabbatorum. quid est ergo sabbatum nisi requies futurorum, leuamen praesentium, quo lex iubet hominum opera feriari, onera deponi? quae sunt grauiora onera nisi nostra peccata?

But perhaps it may trouble someone that he did not say "remembrance of sins," but "concerning the sabbath day," or, as another has it, "of the sabbaths." What, then, is the sabbath but the rest of things to come, the relief of things present, on which the law bids men's works cease and burdens be laid down? What are heavier burdens than our sins?

37.2.3CSEL 64:138

haec deponantur in sabbatorum diebus, hoc est in hoc uitae istius tempore. septem enim diebus ebdomada omnis concluditur, sex diebus mundus iste formatus est, septimo die requieuit dominus ab opere suo, qui in nostra mansuetudine requiescit, sicut ipse dixit: super quem requiescam nisi supra humilem atque mansuetum? absolue te ergo omni sabbato, ableua pondus erroris, ut securus ad illius futuri sabbati requiem peruenire merearis; nam si hinc peccata grauia portaueris, illic requiem non habebis. exonera igitur tuam mentem, reice om-

Let these be laid down on the sabbath days, that is, in this time of this life. For every week is concluded in seven days; in six days this world was formed; on the seventh day the Lord rested from his work, who rests in our gentleness, as he himself said: "On whom shall I rest but on the humble and gentle?" Free yourself, then, every sabbath; lift off the weight of error, so that you may deserve to come secure to the rest of that future sabbath; for if you carry grave sins from here, you will have no rest there. Unburden your mind, then; cast off all

37.2.4CSEL 64:138

nia quibus conscientia grauatur et premitur, ne fiat fuga tua hieme uel sabbato. uita haec in labore est, illa in requie. leuiorem te saeculi huius repperiat consummatio, ne oneratus peccatis fugere non possis. ante fuge, ut praeuenias. fugit saeculum qui saeculi inlecebris non tenetur, qui se omni cura eius absoluit. fuge etiam futuram iram, hoc est iudicii diem. fugit eam qui egerit paenitentiam; sic enim definiuit Baptista Iohannes dicens: generatio uiperarum, quis uobis demonstrauit fugere ab ira futura? facite ergo fructus dignos paenitentiae.

that weighs and presses on your conscience, lest your flight be in winter or on the sabbath. This life is in labor, that in rest. Let the end of this world find you lighter, lest, weighed down with sins, you cannot flee. Flee beforehand, so as to anticipate. He flees the world who is not held by the world's enticements, who frees himself from all its care. Flee also the wrath to come, that is, the day of judgment. He flees it who has done penance; for so John the Baptist defined it, saying: "Brood of vipers, who showed you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruits, then, worthy of repentance."

Explanation 37, chapter 3

37.3.1CSEL 64:138

Audistis hodie legi, quia Iohannes baptizabat in Aenon iuxta Salim. Aenon dicitur oculus suppliciorum, Salim ipse ascendens; hoc habet interpretatio. qui ergo baptizari eligit, sup-

You heard it read today that John was baptizing in Aenon near Salim. Aenon is interpreted "eye of punishments," Salim "he who ascends"; so the interpretation has it. He, then, who chooses to be baptized

37.3.2CSEL 64:138–139

plicia praeuidet et ideo confugit ad baptismatis sacramentum, ut peccatum omne deponat, ne obnoxius incipiat esse suppliciis. et forte supplicia praeuidet qui baptizatur baptismo paenitentiae; at uero ille gratiam spectat qui baptizatur in Christo. baptismum ergo Iohannis oculus suppliciorum est, baptismus Christi oculus gratiarum. tamen, etsi in Aenon baptizabat Iohannes, iuxta ascendentem baptizabat; hoc enim et ista habet interpretatio, ut Salim dicatur ipse ascendens. proximus.

foresees punishments and so flees to the sacrament of baptism, to lay down every sin, lest he begin to be liable to punishments. And perhaps he who is baptized with the baptism of repentance foresees punishments; but he who is baptized in Christ looks to grace. John's baptism, then, is the eye of punishments, Christ's baptism the eye of graces. Yet, though John baptized in Aenon, he baptized near the one ascending; for this too the interpretation has, that Salim is called "he who ascends." Near,

37.3.3CSEL 64:139

ergo erat Christo qui eius nuntiabat aduentum. etenim filius hominis, qui descendit de caelo, ipse est et qui ascendit in caelum, ut impleret omnia. sed quia qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes, et ille ascendit in caelum qui terrena deponens consepelitur in Christo, ut cum Christo resurgat a morte peccati ad nouitatem uitae hereditatisque consortium, ut fiat, sicut scriptum est, dei heres, Christi coheres.

then, to Christ was he who announced his coming. For the Son of Man who came down from heaven is he who also ascended into heaven, to fill all things. But because "as is the heavenly, such are the heavenly," he too ascends into heaven who, laying aside earthly things, is buried with Christ, so as to rise with Christ from the death of sin to newness of life and share in the inheritance, to become, as it is written, an heir of God, a co-heir with Christ.

Explanation 37, chapter 4

37.4.1CSEL 64:139

Uera ergo medicina est gerere paenitentiam, quae tunc legitime praedicata est quando medicus uenit e caelo, qui non exasperaret uulnera, sed sanaret. bonus medicus, qui docuit quemadmodum in hac terra corporis nostri remedia quaereremus, cum flos nobis herbae salutaris oriretur, qui de peccato damnauit peccatum in carne.

True medicine, then, is to do penance, which was rightly preached when the physician came from heaven, who would not inflame wounds but heal them. A good physician, who taught how we should seek remedies in this earth of our body, when the flower of the healing herb arose for us, who condemned sin by sin in the flesh.

37.4.2CSEL 64:139

antidotum ergo facta est caro, quae erat uenenum ante peccati, quia erat inlecebra peccatorum. audi, quemadmodum antidoton caro: dei uerbum factum est caro, misit manum in cauernam aspidum, uenenum euacuauit, peccatum abstulit, id est: de peccato damnauit peccatum in carne.

So the flesh, which before was the poison of sin, became an antidote, since it was the enticement of sins. Hear how the flesh is an antidote: the Word of God became flesh, put his hand into the hole of asps, emptied the poison, took away sin; that is, "he condemned sin by sin in the flesh."

Explanation 37, chapter 5

37.5.1CSEL 64:139–140

Et ut hoc possit plenius considerari, ipsum apostoli capitulum recenseamus. namque ita scriptum est: deus filium suum mittens in similitudine carnis peccati et de peccato damnauit peccatum in carne, ut iustificatio legis impleretur in nobis, ut non secundum carnem ambulemus, sed secundum spiritum. uenit ergo filius dei in similitudine carnis peccati; non utique in similitudine carnis uenit qui ueram carnem suscepit, sed in similitudine carnis peccati, id est carnis peccatricis;

And so that this can be considered more fully, let us review the very passage of the apostle. For so it is written: "God, sending his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, also by sin condemned sin in the flesh, so that the justification of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit." The Son of God came, then, in the likeness of sinful flesh; he certainly did not come in the likeness of flesh, who took true flesh, but in the likeness of the flesh of sin, that is, of sinful flesh;

37.5.2CSEL 64:140

facta enim erat fraude et ueneno infusa serpentis caro nostra caro peccati. postquam est obnoxia facta peccato, facta erat caro mortis, quia erat morti debita. huius carnis iam reae, iam praeiudicatae similitudinem Christus in sua carne suscepit, quia, etsi naturalem substantiam huius susceperat carnis, non tamen contagia ulla susceperat nec in iniquitatibus conceptus et natus est in delictis,

for by the serpent's fraud and poured-in poison our flesh had become the flesh of sin. After it became liable to sin, it had become the flesh of death, because it was owed to death. The likeness of this flesh, already guilty, already prejudged, Christ took in his own flesh, because, though he had taken the natural substance of this flesh, yet he had taken no contagion, nor was he conceived in iniquities and born in offenses,

37.5.3CSEL 64:140

qui non ex sanguinibus neque ex uoluntate carnis neque ex uoluntate uiri, sed de spiritu sancto natus ac uirgine est. quid ergo est: de peccato peccatum damnauit in carne? utrum de similitudine carnis peccati an quia peccata nostra Christus non usu, sed qualitate suscepit, non crimine, sed suae misericordiae sacramento, et peccatum pro nobis factus est qui peccatum ipse non fecit; an uero quia etiam de ista carne peccati, hoc est nostra hac obnoxia et praeiudicata damnauit peccatum in carne, docendo

who was born not of bloods nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of the Holy Spirit and the virgin. What, then, is: "by sin he condemned sin in the flesh"? Is it by the likeness of sinful flesh, or because Christ took our sins not by practice but by condition, not by crime but by the mystery of his mercy, and he who did no sin was made sin for us? Or rather because even by this flesh of sin, that is, this liable and prejudged flesh of ours, he condemned sin in the flesh, by teaching

37.5.4CSEL 64:140

quemadmodum in carne positi non secundum carnem ambulemus, sed secundum spiritum? peccatum est quippe secundum carnem ambulare, quia luxui et uoluptatibus et lasciuiis et carnis cupiditatibus uiuit, qui secundum carnis sapientiam conuersatur; sapientia enim carnis inimica est deo, unde qui in carne sunt deo placere non possunt. ideoque peccatum damnat de peccato, qui se a carnis uitiis ableuando secundum spiritum uiuit totus deo deditus et caelestibus intentus oraculis, propter quod Christus aduenit, ut non suam, id est carnis, sed dei faceret uoluntatem. si quis ergo illum sequatur, ut faciat quae placent deo et carnis suae comprimat appetentiam, imitator est Christi.

how, placed in the flesh, we may walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit? For it is sin to walk according to the flesh, because he lives for luxury and pleasures and wantonness and the desires of the flesh who conducts himself according to the wisdom of the flesh; for the wisdom of the flesh is hostile to God, hence those who are in the flesh cannot please God. And so he condemns sin by sin who, lifting himself from the vices of the flesh, lives according to the Spirit, wholly given to God and intent on the heavenly oracles; for this Christ came, to do not his own will, that is the flesh's, but God's. If anyone follows him, then, so as to do what pleases God and restrain the appetite of his flesh, he is an imitator of Christ.

Explanation 37, chapter 6

37.6.1CSEL 64:140–141

Quid senserimus, expressimus; qui legis, elige quid sequaris. nullus error, ubi simplex pietatis affectus atque omnis fidelis est sensus. damnauit peccatum Christus suscipiendo similitudinem carnis peccati, ut delicta nostrae carnis aboleret. damnauit peccatum, ut peccata nostra in sua carne crucifigeret, factus pro nobis ipse peccatum, ut nos in ipso essemus iustitia dei qui eramus captiuitas mortis et praeda serpentis.

We have expressed what we think; you who read, choose what to follow. There is no error where there is a simple feeling of piety and every sense is faithful. Christ condemned sin by taking the likeness of sinful flesh, so as to abolish the offenses of our flesh. He condemned sin, so as to crucify our sins in his flesh, himself made sin for us, so that we might be the justice of God in him, who were the captivity of death and the prey of the serpent.

37.6.2CSEL 64:141

ergo pietatis est susceptio peccatorum ista, non criminis. per hoc peccatum nos deus aeternus absoluit, qui filio suo proprio non pepercit et peccatum eum fecit esse pro nobis. deinde damnauit peccatum Christus in carne de ipsa carne peccati, quae iudicabili quodam uigore et auctoritate censoria odit uitia quae amare consueuerat et horret inpudicitiam quam uoluptatem putabat.

This taking of sins, then, is one of piety, not of crime. By this sin the eternal God absolved us, who did not spare his own Son and made him to be sin for us. Then Christ condemned sin in the flesh by the very flesh of sin, which, with a kind of judging vigor and censorial authority, hates the vices it used to love and shudders at the impurity it used to think pleasure.

37.6.3CSEL 64:141

segregat se a lasciuiis, abdicat a cupiditatibus, renuntiat criminibus atque flagitiis, propulsat auaritiam, quae uirilitatem quandam carnis effeminat. en tibi illum Christi imitatorem et ipsum de peccato peccatum in carne damnantem: sic curro, inquit, non ut in incertum, sic luctor non ut aera caedens, sed castigo corpus meum et seruituti redigo, ne, cum aliis praedicauerim, ipse reprobus efficiar.

It separates itself from wantonness, renounces desires, renounces crimes and shameful deeds, drives off avarice, which makes effeminate a certain manliness of the flesh. Here you have that imitator of Christ himself condemning sin by sin in the flesh: "So I run," he says, "not as uncertainly; so I wrestle, not as beating the air; but I chastise my body and bring it into servitude, lest, having preached to others, I myself become reprobate."

Explanation 37, chapter 7

37.7.1CSEL 64:141

Non superfluo, ut arbitror, euagati sumus, quia et hoc ad medicinam hominis pertinebat. cui medicinae prospiciens deus, sicut terram istam salubres herbarum atque arborum sucos ferre praecepit, quibus carnis uulnera curarentur, ita etiam praeceptis salutaribus repleuit diuinarum seriem scripturarum, quibus infirmitas animae sanaretur.

We have not strayed superfluously, I think, for this too belonged to man's medicine. Providing for this medicine, God, as he commanded this earth to bear healing juices of herbs and trees by which the wounds of the flesh might be cured, so also filled the series of the divine Scriptures with healing precepts by which the weakness of the soul might be healed.

37.7.2CSEL 64:141

itaque quam graue est, ut muta animalia medicari sibi nouerint et uulneribus suis herbas salubres requirant, deligere non refutent, et hominum industria non requirat, quibus etiam medicus est missus, qui medicinae salutaris in ueteribus scripturis semina demonstraret et noua ipse deferret! quam multa itaque salubria sunt, quae noxia perfunctorie iudicantur, de ipsa terra sumamus exempla.

So how grave it is that dumb animals know how to doctor themselves and seek healing herbs for their wounds, and do not refuse to choose them, while human diligence does not seek them, to whom a physician was even sent, to show the seeds of healing medicine in the old Scriptures and to bring new ones himself! How many things, then, are healthful that are lightly judged harmful: let us take examples from the earth itself.

Explanation 37, chapter 8

37.8.1CSEL 64:141–142

Serpens alit uenenum, morsus noxios habet, uulnerat carnem; sed in ipso quoque eius ueneno antidotum repperies, si requiras. denique caro eius exuritur, cuius puluere theriaca conficitur, qua ueneni uis consueuit hebetari, ut nocere non possit. non terra ergo in uitio, quae serpentem generat, sed ille qui nescit cauere serpentem.

The serpent nourishes venom, has harmful bites, wounds the flesh; but in its very venom you will find an antidote, if you seek it. Indeed its flesh is burned, and from its ash theriac is made, by which the force of venom is usually blunted so that it cannot harm. The fault, then, is not in the earth, which produces the serpent, but in him who does not know how to beware of the serpent.

37.8.2CSEL 64:142

ipse serpens potest tibi prodesse, si intellegas, immo si medici praecepta non spernas. imitandum disce quem putas esse fugiendum: estote, inquit, astuti sicut serpentes et simplices sicut columbae. serua caput tuum sicut serpens; etsi laceratus toto corpore fueris, reuiuesces. caput tuum Christus est, quia caput ipse est uiri; si seruaueris fidem, etsi mortuus fueris sicut serpens, et tu resurges. imitare serpentem, qui exteriorem suum exuit, ut renouetur interior; imitare serpentem, qui uenenum suum euomit.

The serpent itself can profit you, if you understand, or rather if you do not spurn the physician's precepts. Learn to imitate him whom you think should be fled: "Be wise," he says, "as serpents and simple as doves." Guard your head as the serpent does; even if you are torn in your whole body, you will revive. Your head is Christ, for he is the head of man; if you keep the faith, even if you die like the serpent, you too will rise again. Imitate the serpent, which strips off its outer self so that the inner may be renewed; imitate the serpent, which vomits up its venom.

37.8.3CSEL 64:142

beatus si et tu cogitationes tuas malas euomas et malitiae tuae uenena deponas. celebris sermo est et scriptorum auctoritate robustus serpentem aquis appropinquantem sibilo sibi feminae anguis sponsare concubitus; illam propriae consulentem saluti ea spondere lege petitos coitus sui usus, si serpens uenenum euomat, captumque oboedire iussis, arma deponere et proprii more conuentus caput ori eius inserere atque, ubi calescere coeperit consuetudo, seu naturae quadam uiolentia seu libidinis ardore feminam stringere ora morsusque libidinis osculis premere atque ita caput serpentis abscidi.

Blessed are you if you too vomit up your evil thoughts and lay aside the poisons of your malice. It is a well-known saying, strengthened by the authority of writers, that the serpent, approaching the waters, betroths by a hiss the embraces of a female eel; she, looking to her own safety, promises the use of the union he seeks on this condition, that the serpent vomit up his venom; and he, caught, obeys the commands, lays down his arms and, in the manner of their union, puts his head into her mouth; and when the intimacy begins to grow warm, whether by a kind of violence of nature or by the heat of lust, the female grips his mouth and presses her bites with the kisses of lust, and so the serpent's head is cut off.

Explanation 37, chapter 9

37.9.1CSEL 64:142–143

Nonne in natura serpentis mysterium fidei recognosces? serpens ille paradisi prior feminam ad culpae adulterium prouocauit. sed ubi uenenum eius effusum est in hunc mundum, suboles illius feminae circumuentionem parentis et fraudem ulta serpentis armis eum suis exuit et caput illius amputauit. quodsi uenena praeualuerint et peccatum in quo est aculeus mortis inrepserit, utere medicorum exemplo, ut tibi serpens uel sero moriatur: conteras eius uenenum corpusque comminuas et admixtum salutaribus sucis noueris temperandum, ut non solum uim suam et uirus amittat, sed etiam fiat remedium de ueneno.

Will you not recognize in the serpent's nature the mystery of faith? That serpent of paradise first provoked the woman to the adultery of guilt. But when his venom had been poured out into this world, the offspring of that woman, avenging the deceiving of their mother and the serpent's fraud, stripped him of his own arms and cut off his head. But if the poisons have prevailed and sin, in which is the sting of death, has crept in, use the physicians' example, so that the serpent may die for you even late: crush his venom and grind his body, and know that it must be mixed with healing juices, so that it not only loses its force and poison but even a remedy is made from the venom.

37.9.2CSEL 64:143

moritur autem tibi serpens ille intellegibilis, si tu moriaris peccato et tibi tua peccata moriantur. sic conteritur eius uenenum, si te tua facta conpungant; sic omnis uis eius aboletur, si bonis operibus tegas et fideli confessione temperes crimen admissum. audi, quemadmodum uirtus draconis ipsius conteratur: conterat, inquit, deus satanan sub pedibus uestris. contere primo cor tuum, in quo erat draconis cubile, ut non inueniat ubi possit habitare. contere carnes draconis; carnes eius peccata nostra sunt.

And that intelligible serpent dies for you if you die to sin and your sins die to you. So his venom is crushed if your deeds prick you; so all his force is abolished if you cover the crime committed with good works and temper it with faithful confession. Hear how the power of the dragon himself is crushed: "May God," he says, "crush Satan under your feet." Crush first your heart, in which was the dragon's lair, so that he finds nowhere to dwell. Crush the dragon's flesh; his flesh is our sins.

37.9.3CSEL 64:143

ideo tibi dicit deus: epulantur in eo gentes et infra ait: praecurrit mori. carnes autem corporis eius sunt adhaerentes ei. sicut enim sancti corpus et membra sunt Christi, ita peccatores, qui peccatum non deserunt, sed peccato inhaerent, corpus draconis et membra. ideo nos Christi corpus epulamur, illi autem corpus epulantur draconis. nos epulamur, qui Christo adhaerere contendimus, remissionem cotidianam et ueniam peccatorum, illi autem, qui peccatis cotidie peccata conectunt, continuationem flagitiorum epulantur et criminum.

So God says to you: "Nations feast on him," and below he says: "Death runs before him." And the flesh of his body is those who cling to him. For as the saints are the body and members of Christ, so sinners, who do not leave sin but cling to sin, are the dragon's body and members. So we feast on the body of Christ, but they feast on the body of the dragon. We who strive to cling to Christ feast on daily remission and pardon of sins; but they, who daily link sins to sins, feast on a continuation of shameful deeds and crimes.

Explanation 37, chapter 10

37.10.1CSEL 64:143

Contere igitur has carnes et super eas contritionem tui cordis asperge, deinde mitte super omnia ea Iordanis aquam. Iordanis enim descensio et ascensio est, quoniam, qui in fontem sacrum descenderit, et ascendit, ut quae superiora sunt quaerat; descendit enim in mortem Christi qui baptizatur in Christo et in resurrectionem eius ascendit.

Crush, then, this flesh, and sprinkle over it the contrition of your heart; then pour over all of it the water of the Jordan. For the Jordan is descent and ascent, since he who goes down into the sacred font also ascends, to seek the things above; for he who is baptized in Christ goes down into Christ's death and ascends into his resurrection.

37.10.2CSEL 64:143–144

si autem iam baptizatus errasti, mitte aquam lacrimarum non mendacem, sed ueram, ut de profundo clames ad dominum deum tuum et dicatur de te: uox audita est in Rama, fletus et ululatus multus; Rachel plorans filios suos et noluit consolari, quia non sunt.

But if, already baptized, you have strayed, pour the water of tears, not false but true, so that you cry from the depths to the Lord your God and it may be said of you: "A voice was heard in Ramah, weeping and much wailing; Rachel weeping for her children, and she would not be consoled, because they are not."

37.10.3CSEL 64:144

Rachel ecclesia est, in qua benedicitur plebs dei. ipsa pro te fleat, ipsa tua peccata deploret et fleat plurimum, ut consolationem non facile admittat, quemadmodum qui plurimum dolent. ideo consolari se noluit, quoniam qui eras esse desisti; sed hac perseuerantia doloris et fletus emereatur, ut dicat: filius meus mortuus erat et reuixit, perierat et inuentus est.

Rachel is the church, in which the people of God is blessed. Let her weep for you, let her lament your sins and weep very much, so that she does not easily admit consolation, as those who grieve very much. So she would not be consoled, because you who were have ceased to be; but by this perseverance of grief and weeping let her deserve to say: "My son was dead and has come to life again; he was lost and is found."

37.10.4CSEL 64:144

aut forte consolari se noluit Rachel in filiis Iudaeorum, quia non sunt, quos utique ideo genuerat, ut essent. et ideo non admisit consolationem occisis paruulis ab Herode, quia nec in aduentum Iesu crediderunt, mensuram sceleris adimplentes, ut et paruulos interficerent, ut inter eos et filius uirginis necaretur. ergo ecclesia domini in Iudaeis consolari se noluit, quia non sunt, in christianis autem, qui ex nationibus congregati sunt, epulatur et gaudet, quoniam coeperunt esse qui non erant.

Or perhaps Rachel would not be consoled in the children of the Jews, because they are not, whom she had borne for this, that they might be. And so she admitted no consolation when the little ones were killed by Herod, because they did not believe even in the coming of Jesus, filling up the measure of crime, so as even to kill little children, so that among them the virgin's son too might be killed. The Lord's church, then, would not be consoled among the Jews, because they are not; but among the Christians, gathered from the nations, she feasts and rejoices, because those who were not have begun to be.

Explanation 37, chapter 11

37.11.1CSEL 64:144

Misisti ergo aquam Iordanis, aquam gratiae; hoc primum bibe. misisti aquam lacrimarum, aquam paenitentiae; hoc secundum est poculum, ut primum repares. bibe aquam de tuis nasi, bibe aquam de tuis fletibus, ut dicas: et potum meum fletu temperabam. fletus ergo tuus potus est tuus et lacrimae tuae cibus est tuus.

You have poured, then, the water of the Jordan, the water of grace; "drink this first." You have poured the water of tears, the water of repentance; this is the second cup, to restore the first. Drink water from your own vessels, drink water from your own weeping, so that you may say: "And I tempered my drink with weeping." Your weeping, then, is your drink, and your tears are your food.

37.11.2CSEL 64:144

fuerunt, inquit, mihi lacrimae meae panis. si lacrimae panes, habes ex peccato iniquitatis cibum conuersionis secundum illud quod legis in euangelio, quoniam cui plus dimittitur plus diligit. unde saepe uidemus aliquos, qui ante neglegentes fuerint christiani, peccato aliquo

"My tears," he says, "have been my bread." If tears are bread, you have from the sin of iniquity the food of conversion, according to what you read in the gospel, that he to whom more is forgiven loves more. Hence we often see some who before were negligent Christians, after committing some sin,

37.11.3CSEL 64:144–145

commisso fieri diligentiores et ex illo per paenitentiam euadere solere perfectos. sicut igitur ex peccato conuersio, ita remedium de ueneno. audi hoc remedium: iustus in principio sermonis accusator est sui. uenenum peccatum est, uenenum iniquitas est; confessio sui criminis remedium prolapsionis est. et ideo uere remedium de ueneno est, si dicas iniquitates tuas, ut iustificeris.

become more diligent, and through penance usually emerge from it perfect. As, then, conversion from sin, so a remedy from venom. Hear this remedy: "The just man at the beginning of his speech is his own accuser." Sin is venom, iniquity is venom; confession of one's crime is the remedy for the fall. And so truly there is a remedy from the venom if you tell your iniquities so as to be justified.

Explanation 37, chapter 12

37.12.1CSEL 64:145

Sed iam psalmum adoriamur, ut ipse nos doceat, quemadmodum agenda paenitentia sit. itaque sic incipit:

But let us now take up the psalm, so that it may itself teach us how penance is to be done. So it begins thus:

Explanation 37, chapter 13

37.13.1CSEL 64:145

Domine, ne in ira tua arguas me neque in furore tuo corripias me. qui paenitentiam agit, paratus esse debet ad obprobria perferenda iniuriasque subeundas nec commoueri, si quis ei peccati sui crimen obiciat. cum enim ipse accusare se debeat, quemadmodum alium non sustinet arguentem? quodsi ab homine argui timere non debet, quanto magis a domino deo suo, cui omnes etiam in his quae sunt occulta peccamus, cum praesertim condemnatio praesentium absolutio futurorum sit; qui autem non condemnantur in saeculo, cum hominibus non flagellabuntur.

"Lord, do not reprove me in your wrath, nor chasten me in your fury." He who does penance must be ready to bear reproaches and undergo injuries, and not be disturbed if someone throws the crime of his sin at him. For since he himself ought to accuse himself, how does he not endure another reproving him? And if he ought not to fear being reproved by a man, how much less by the Lord his God, against whom we all sin even in hidden things, especially since condemnation in the present is absolution for the future; but those who are not condemned in the world will not be scourged with men.

37.13.2CSEL 64:145

uae mihi, si de me dicatur: habet mercedem suam! si bonum factum hac condemnatur sententia, quanto magis crimen grauatur! nam si misericordia facili iactata sermone fructu fraudatur aeterno, quanto magis iniquitatis poena acerbi faenoris accessione differtur! ergo qui paenitentiam agit offerre se debet ad poenam, ut hic puniatur a domino, non ad supplicia aeterna seruetur, nec expectare tempus, sed occurrere diuinae indignationi.

Woe to me if it is said of me: "He has his reward!" If a good deed is condemned by this sentence, how much more is a crime weighed down! For if mercy, flaunted in easy speech, is cheated of eternal fruit, how much more is the punishment of iniquity deferred with the accrual of bitter interest! He, then, who does penance must offer himself to punishment, so as to be punished here by the Lord, not kept for eternal torments; nor wait for the time, but go to meet the divine indignation.

Explanation 37, chapter 14

37.14.1CSEL 64:145–146

Uide facta Dauid eius precibus conuenire. offenderat dominum, quia numerari iusserat populum. confessione praeuenit dei nuntium peccasse se ualde et nimis stulte fecisse commemorans, non quasi ammoneret oblitum, sed quasi urgeret morantem, ne diutius commotionem differret offensae. peccaui, inquit, uade, quoniam hoc uerbum feci; et nunc, domine, dele iniquitatem serui tui. quomodo deleantur peccata, audi dicentem: solutum est peccatum eius,

See David's deeds agree with his prayers. He had offended the Lord because he had ordered the people to be numbered. By confession he anticipated God's messenger, saying that he had sinned greatly and acted very foolishly, not as though reminding one who had forgotten, but as though urging one who delayed, lest he put off longer the anger at the offense. "I have sinned," he says, "go, because I have done this thing; and now, Lord, blot out the iniquity of your servant." Hear one saying how sins are blotted out: "His sin is loosed,

37.14.2CSEL 64:146

quia cepit de manu domini duplicia peccata sua. non ergo penitus sibi peccatum remitti postulat, sed moderata solutione deleri, hoc est ut in futurum eius memoria deleatur. denique quasi interpellantis uoce conuentus dominus, ne uindicta commissi protelaretur erroris, misit ad eum Nathan prophetam, et ille uenit ad regem et dixit ei: quid fieri uelis, elige: triennium famem super terram aut tribus mensibus fugere te a facie inimicorum tuorum et illos persequentes aut triduo fieri mortem in terra.

for he has received from the Lord's hand double for his sins." He does not ask, then, that the sin be entirely remitted to him, but that it be blotted out by a moderate payment, that is, that its memory be blotted out for the future. Indeed the Lord, as though summoned by the voice of one appealing, so that the vengeance of the error committed should not be drawn out, sent to him the prophet Nathan, and he came to the king and said to him: "Choose what you wish to be done: three years of famine on the land, or for three months to flee before your enemies while they pursue, or for three days death in the land.

37.14.3CSEL 64:146

et nunc scito et uide, quid respondeam illi qui misit me. uide docentem deum, qua moderatione eius indignatio leniatur, si non penitus uerbera recusemus, sed qualitatem leuandi, non euitandi supplicii postulemus. tria proposuit, ut quod moderatius putaret eligeret. uide etiam quemadmodum ad paenitentiam prouocat, ut nos offeramus iniuriae, eligere mandans, ut in ipsa poena electionis quaedam praerogatiua seruetur et reo suo blandiatur hoc uerbo. et dixit Dauid ad Nathan: angustiae mihi sunt in his tribus; sed magis incidam in manus domini, quo-

And now know and see what I shall answer him who sent me." See God teaching by what moderation his indignation is softened, if we do not entirely refuse the blows but ask for a kind of lightening, not avoiding, of the punishment. He proposed three, so that he might choose what he thought more moderate. See also how he calls to penance, so that we offer ourselves to suffering, commanding him to choose, so that even in the punishment a certain privilege of choice is kept and he flatters his defendant by this word. "And David said to Nathan: I am in straits in these three; but let me rather fall into the hands of the Lord, for

37.14.4CSEL 64:146–147

niam magna est misericordia illius, quam in hominum manus. numquid donari sibi poenam poposcit erroris? quod si fecisset, inpudentiae notaretur, qui moderationi diuinae fuisset ingratus. plurimum suffragatur reo uerecunda confessio et poenam, quam defensione euitare non possumus, pudore releuamus. elegit non quod a flagello esset immune, sed quod moderatius iudicauit, ut dei lenitati magis, qui nosset ignoscere, quam hominum se committeret potestati, qui mensuram ultionis frequenter excederent. miseretur itaque qui nescit errare, non miseretur qui erroris est particeps.

his mercy is great, than into the hands of men." Did he ask that the penalty for his error be remitted? Had he done so, he would have been marked with impudence, as ungrateful to the divine moderation. A modest confession helps the defendant most, and the punishment that we cannot avoid by defense we lighten by shame. He chose not what was free of the scourge, but what he judged more moderate, so as to entrust himself to the gentleness of God, who knew how to forgive, rather than to the power of men, who often exceed the measure of vengeance. He has mercy who does not know how to err; he does not have mercy who shares in error.

Explanation 37, chapter 15

37.15.1CSEL 64:147

Nec fefellit sanctum Dauid fides sua, sed in ipsa quoque offensione gratiam diuinae miserationis emeruit. nam qui proposuerat mortem triduo exercere in terra, ne unum quidem diem passus est praeterire, sed ad horam prandii libenter indulsit et, ut uerbo scripturae utar, habuit paenitentiam super malitiam. uide quomodo te scriptura hortatur, ut et tu paenitentiam non refugias, si sequaris deum quem sequi debes.

Nor did his faith deceive holy David, but even in the offense he won the grace of divine compassion. For he who had proposed to exercise death three days in the land did not let even one day pass, but at the hour of the midday meal gladly relented and, to use the word of Scripture, repented of the evil. See how Scripture urges you not to shun repentance either, if you follow God, whom you ought to follow.

37.15.2CSEL 64:147

bene addidit super malitiam, quia uidetur omnis dura esse uindicta. ideo et dies iudicii dies dicitur mala, de qua beatus est qui per deum liberatur, ut scriptum est: in die mala liberabit eum dominus. et dixit, inquit, angelo dominus, ut sibi parceret. uide autem quia, quando uult dominus ignoscere, dat gratiam et fiduciam deprecandi. et uidit Dauid ferientem angelum et dixit: ecce ego sum. ego peccaui et ego pastor male feci; et isti in hoc grege quid fecerunt? fiat manus tua in me et in domo patris mei.

Well he added "of the evil," because every vengeance seems hard. So the day of judgment too is called an evil day, from which he is blessed who is freed through God, as it is written: "In the evil day the Lord will deliver him." "And the Lord said," it says, "to the angel, that he should spare." See that, when the Lord wishes to forgive, he gives the grace and confidence to pray. "And David saw the angel striking and said: Behold, it is I; I have sinned and I the shepherd have done evil; and these in this flock, what have they done? Let your hand be upon me and upon my father's house."

37.15.3CSEL 64:147–148

si mandauerat dominus angelo ut parceret, quomodo feriebat adhuc angelus, nisi quia dominus, etsi uult ignoscere, uult rogari et ut rogetur operatur? nec uidisset homo angelum ferientem, nisi dominus eius oculis angelum reuelasset. unde et Heliseus dicit: domine, aperi nunc oculos pueri huius ut uideat; et aperti sunt oculi pueri eius et uidit montem equis repletum et curribus in circuitu prophetae. nec te moueat, quod persona uilior seruuli quam prophetae uel regis, quia uilior et equorum et curruum species quam sanctitas angelorum.

If the Lord had commanded the angel to spare, how was the angel still striking, unless because the Lord, even when he wills to forgive, wills to be asked, and works so that he is asked? Nor would a man have seen the angel striking, unless the Lord had revealed the angel to his eyes. Hence Elisha too says: "Lord, open now the eyes of this boy that he may see"; and the eyes of his boy were opened and he saw the mountain full of horses and chariots around the prophet. Do not be troubled that the person of a servant is meaner than that of a prophet or king, because the sight of horses and chariots is also meaner than the holiness of angels.

Explanation 37, chapter 16

37.16.1CSEL 64:148

Et fortasse aliquibus perfunctorie legentibus durum uideatur, quod Dauid ille humilis corde atque mansuetus, qui parcebat inimicis, mortem magis populi elegit quam suam fugam aut famem super terram. famem uitauit populi, quia grauior morte et omnibus suppliciis habetur, quam sequitur etiam pestilentia quae caelum contaminat, mortem aceruat. suam fugam non poposcit

And perhaps to some who read carelessly it may seem hard that David, humble of heart and gentle, who spared his enemies, chose the death of the people rather than his own flight or famine on the land. He avoided the famine of the people, because it is held graver than death and all punishments, and pestilence also follows it, which pollutes the sky and heaps up death. He did not ask for his own flight

37.16.2CSEL 64:148

propter illud, quia propheta pro populo deprecari poterat, sicut factum est, populus pro propheta interuenire non poterat. scriptum est enim: si populus errauerit, sacerdos orabit pro eo. si sacerdos errauerit, quis rogabit pro eo? et tamen, ubi uidit occidi populum, ipse se angelo ferienti optulit, ut ipse potius pro populo feriretur. plus est quod nec ipsa perterritus specie mortuorum gladio se optulit, quam si remissionem propositae condicionis optasset. in electione itaque rationem secutus est, in dolore pietatem.

because the prophet could pray for the people, as happened, but the people could not intercede for the prophet. For it is written: "If the people err, the priest will pray for them. If the priest errs, who will ask for him?" And yet, when he saw the people being killed, he offered himself to the striking angel, so that he rather might be struck for the people. It is more that, not terrified even by the sight of the dead, he offered himself to the sword, than if he had wished for remission of the proposed condition. In the choice, then, he followed reason; in grief, piety.

Explanation 37, chapter 17

37.17.1CSEL 64:148

Uide autem domini gratiam, quod et ipse de proposita condicione deflexit. numquid aliquod miserationis est crimen, quia plus minatur et minus exigit? qui in remuneratione praemiorum sua promissa custodit, in exactione poenarum praescriptum remordet. cum irascitur, reum differt, cum miseretur, properat ut absoluat. terret ut corrigat, ammonet ut emendet, praeuenit ut ignoscat.

But see the Lord's grace, that he too turned from the proposed condition. Is it any crime of compassion that he threatens more and exacts less? He who in rewarding keeps his promises, in exacting punishments takes back what he prescribed. When he is angry, he puts off the defendant; when he has mercy, he hastens to absolve. He terrifies to correct, warns to amend, anticipates to forgive.

37.17.2CSEL 64:148

unde et alibi ait propheta de domino: calix in manu domini uini meri plenus est mixto; uerumtamen faex eius non est exinanita. ad terrendum plenus est calix, ad feriendum non est exinanitus. plenus erat calix, cum

Hence elsewhere too the prophet says of the Lord: "A cup in the hand of the Lord is full of mixed unmixed wine; yet its dregs are not emptied." To terrify the cup is full; to strike it is not emptied. The cup was full when

37.17.3CSEL 64:148–149

mors per triduum mandaretur, sed occurrit misericordia dei, tenuit manum angeli, priusquam calicem istum exinaniret. ut scias autem, quia calix poena uel gladius est, audi dicentem: accipe calicem uini meri huius de manu mea, et potionabis omnes gentes ad quas ego mittam te, et uoment et insanient a facie gladii, et ad Hierusalem dicitur: bibisti calicem irae de manu domini; calicem enim ruinae bibisti et exinanisti, nec erat qui te consolaretur. Hierusalem mensuram bibit, quae supra mensuram peccauit.

death was commanded for three days; but God's mercy ran to meet it and held the angel's hand before he emptied that cup. And so that you may know that the cup is punishment or the sword, hear one saying: "Take this cup of unmixed wine from my hand, and you will make all the nations to which I send you drink, and they will vomit and go mad before the sword"; and to Jerusalem it is said: "You have drunk the cup of wrath from the hand of the Lord; for you have drunk the cup of ruin and emptied it, and there was none to comfort you." Jerusalem drank the measure, which sinned beyond measure.

37.17.4CSEL 64:149

ecclesia Christianorum calicem irae exinanire non nouit, sed exinaniuit unguentum, propter quam se Christus exinaniuit, ut ubique fragraret. de manu domini hoc munus accepit, poculum autem mortis ignorat. duos calices lego, unum mortis, alterum uitae. mortis calicem suo Christus exinaniuit in sanguine et nouum calicem ministrauit, ut dicamus: calicem salutaris accipiam, noui calicem testamenti, qui in remissionem effunditur peccatorum. effunditur hic calix et faex eius non inuenitur, quia mundat omne delictum.

The Christians' church does not know how to empty the cup of wrath, but it emptied the ointment, for whose sake Christ emptied himself, so that it might be fragrant everywhere. This gift it received from the Lord's hand, but it does not know the cup of death. I read of two cups, one of death, the other of life. The cup of death Christ emptied in his own blood and served a new cup, so that we may say: "I will take the cup of salvation," the cup of the new testament, which is poured out for the remission of sins. This cup is poured out, and its dregs are not found, because it cleanses every offense.

Explanation 37, chapter 18

37.18.1CSEL 64:149

Diximus quemadmodum in ulciscendo inflectat dominus commotionem suam; dicamus quemadmodum in remunerando praeueniat nostram precationem et doceamus exemplo. audi illum ex duobus latronem dicentem domino: memento mei, domine, cum ueneris in regnum tuum. respondit dominus: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. ille adhuc rogabat, ut meminisset sui cum uenisset in regnum, et dominus iam regnum caeleste tribuebat. quam uelox misericordia! tardius uotum precantis quam remunerantis est praemium.

We have said how the Lord bends his anger in avenging; let us say how in rewarding he anticipates our prayer, and teach by an example. Hear that one of the two thieves saying to the Lord: "Remember me, Lord, when you come into your kingdom." The Lord answered: "Amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." He was still asking to be remembered when he came into the kingdom, and the Lord was already granting the heavenly kingdom. How swift a mercy! Slower is the vow of the one praying than the reward of the one giving.

Explanation 37, chapter 19

37.19.1CSEL 64:149–150

Ideo ergo Dauid moderationem tenuit, non remissionem orauit dicens: domine, ne in ira tua arguas me neque in furore tuo corripias me. furor Graece θυμὸς dicitur et irae impetus. hoc ergo Latinus uoluit exprimere: neque in ira neque in ipso impetu irae arguas me aut corripias. correptio autem eruditio est; ipsa Graece dicitur παιδεία, de qua dicitur: beatus homo quem tu erudieris, domine.

So David kept to moderation; he did not pray for remission, saying: "Lord, do not reprove me in your wrath, nor chasten me in your fury." "Fury" in Greek is θυμός, the impetus of anger. This the Latin wished to express: neither in anger nor in the very impetus of anger reprove or chasten me. And chastening is instruction; in Greek it is called παιδεία, of which it is said: "Blessed is the man whom you instruct, O Lord."

37.19.2CSEL 64:150

non enim deus passioni patet, ut irascatur, cum sit inpassibilis; sed quia uindicat, uidetur irasci. nobis hoc uidetur, quia ipsi cum commotione uindicare consueuimus. plerumque tamen et homines inueniuntur, cum uindicant, non moueri, sed summa patientia celebrare uindictam, exercere tormenta. cur ergo mireris in deo, si hoc interdum in homine recognoscas?

For God is not open to passion, so as to be angry, since he is impassible; but because he punishes, he seems to be angry. It seems so to us, because we ourselves are used to punishing with agitation. Yet often men too are found who, when they punish, are not moved, but carry out punishment and apply torments with the greatest calm. Why, then, wonder at it in God, if you sometimes recognize it in man?

37.19.3CSEL 64:150

uindictam autem iram esse supra diximus de die irae. denique usus habet, ut dicamus de quoquam punito, quia iram incidit legum, non quia legum iram, sed quia legum seueritatem incidit. sic et alibi de decem plagis Aegyptiorum ait: misit in eos iram per angelos malos, id est uindictam; lex enim nescit irasci, sed scit legum minister. nescit ergo irasci et qui auctor est legum, cui terrendi est uoluntas, non puniendi. imitamini ergo, imperatores, exemplum diuinum, ut sitis in statuendis legibus seueriores, in exigendis suppliciis misericordes.

And we said above, of the day of wrath, that wrath is punishment. Indeed usage has it that we say of someone punished that he fell into the wrath of the laws, not because the laws have wrath, but because he fell into the severity of the laws. So too elsewhere, of the ten plagues of the Egyptians, he says: "He sent wrath on them through evil angels," that is, punishment; for the law does not know how to be angry, but the minister of the laws does. Neither, then, does he know how to be angry who is the author of laws, whose will is to frighten, not to punish. Imitate, then, you emperors, the divine example, so as to be more severe in making laws, merciful in exacting punishments.

37.19.4CSEL 64:150–151

seueritas legum insolentem restringat audaciam, misericordia principum reos subtrahat poenae. recognoscit igitur propheta culpam suam, uidet uulnera, curari postulat. qui sanari uult, argui non reformidat, sed non uult argui in furore, sed in uerbo dei. uerbum dei sanitas est; sic enim legimus: misit uerbum suum, et sanauit eos. non uult erudiri in ira, sed in doctrina, ut si medicum roges, ne secet uulnus tuum, sed medicamentum apponat. urget medicamento, sed non secat, est dolor, sed non supra mensuram doloris, mordet, sed non cruentat.

Let the severity of the laws restrain insolent boldness; let the mercy of princes withdraw the guilty from punishment. So the prophet recognizes his guilt, sees his wounds, asks to be healed. He who wishes to be healed does not fear to be reproved, but he does not want to be reproved in fury, but in the word of God. The word of God is health; for so we read: "He sent his word and healed them." He does not want to be instructed in anger, but in teaching, as if you asked a physician not to cut your wound but to apply a medicine. He presses with medicine but does not cut; there is pain, but not beyond the measure of pain; it bites, but does not draw blood.

Explanation 37, chapter 20

37.20.1CSEL 64:151

Et addidit: quoniam sagittae tuae infixae sunt mihi. eadem uidetur dicere quae sanctus Iob, sed diuersa sunt. nam et ille ait: sagittae enim domini in corpore meo sunt, quarum furor bibit sanguinem meum, cum incipio loqui, conpungunt me. ille de uulnere sui corporis queritur, hic deplorat animae suae uulnera. et forte hic agit paenitentiam de peccato, ille causam agit infirmitatis humanae et quasi nostrae inbecillitatis assertor ad remedium operis auxilium creatoris exposcit.

And he added: "For your arrows are fixed in me." He seems to say the same as holy Job, but they are different. For he too says: "For the arrows of the Lord are in my body, whose fury drinks my blood; when I begin to speak, they prick me." He complains of the wound of his body; this one laments the wounds of his soul. And perhaps this one does penance for sin, that one pleads the cause of human weakness and, as a defender of our frailty, begs the help of the Creator as a remedy for his work.

37.20.2CSEL 64:151

hic igitur precatur, ille patrocinatur, ideoque uehementior huius est dolor, quia animae uulnera grauiora quam carnis sunt. ille dicit sagittas domini in suo esse corpore, iste deplorat infixas; illius sanguis bibitur, huius effunditur; ille conpungitur, hic uulneratur; illum manus dei tetigit, super hunc confirmata est graui pondere; hic animam suam deflet illusionibus esse completam, ille suum corpus ulceribus. manum autem dei uirtutem intellegimus puniendi.

This one, then, prays; that one pleads; and so this one's grief is the more vehement, because the wounds of the soul are graver than those of the flesh. That one says the arrows of the Lord are in his body; this one laments that they are fixed; that one's blood is drunk, this one's is poured out; that one is pricked, this one wounded; the hand of God touched that one; upon this one it is confirmed with heavy weight; this one weeps that his soul is filled with mockeries, that one that his body is filled with sores. And by the hand of God we understand the power of punishing.

37.20.4CSEL 64:151–152

hanc manum Dauid in se ipso expertus et liberis alterius incestum, alterius parricidium deplorauit et, quod pio patri grauius est suae salutis exitiis, simul obprobria subolis et pietatis defleuit excidia; quorum alter ad incestum ac-

This hand David experienced in himself, and lamented in his children the incest of one, the parricide of another; and, what is graver for a loving father than the ruin of his own safety, he wept at once the disgrace of his offspring and the destruction of family love. Of these, one to incest

37.20.5CSEL 64:152

census de germanitatis affectu, alter ad parricidium armatus est studio castitatis. quemadmodum illos in grauissimis criminibus confinia lusere uirtutum! utinam aut ille sororem non amasset aut hic non uindicasset! ad postremum et ipse patriae finibus pulsus a filio fugiebat hostem quem optabat heredem, metuebat uincere, ne pietatis dispendio uinceretur.

was kindled from brotherly affection, the other armed for parricide by zeal for chastity. How the borders of virtues deceived them in the gravest crimes! Would that the one had not loved his sister or the other had not avenged her! Lastly he himself, driven from the borders of his country by his son, fled the enemy whom he wished as heir; he feared to conquer, lest he be conquered at the cost of fatherly love.

37.20.8CSEL 64:151

haec manus regem Aegyptiorum propter Abrahae iniuriam ob temptatam Sarrae pudicitiam flagellauit, haec manus Aegyptiorum currus et equos et populos Rubri Maris demersit profundo, haec manus mentem grauauit regis Saul, ut gratiam sui conseruatoris odisset et pro praeuaricatione caelestis imperii desertus a sociis, interemptis quoque filiis destitutus, uictus ab hostibus, quo spectaculo nihil est deformius regi, gladium suum in se ipse conuerteret, ne captiuus senex uiueret et filiis superstes et regno.

This hand scourged the king of the Egyptians for the wrong done to Abraham, for the attempt on Sarah's chastity; this hand sank the chariots and horses and peoples of the Egyptians in the depth of the Red Sea; this hand weighed down King Saul's mind, so that he hated the favor of his preserver, and, for his transgression of the heavenly command, deserted by his companions, bereft too when his sons were killed, beaten by his enemies (than which no sight is more shameful for a king), he turned his own sword on himself, lest he live as an aged captive surviving his sons and his kingdom.

Explanation 37, chapter 21

37.21.1CSEL 64:152

Sed forte aliquis dicat, quomodo in parricidio uel incesto manus fuerit dei, cum opus illud inimici sit. cognoscamus igitur, quoniam et, ubi diabolus uulnerat sagittae domini uulnerare dicantur. nempe sic legimus, quod, cum in concilio angelorum sanctum Iob seruulum suum dominus conuersus ad diabolum praedicaret, ut ureretur inuidus et humani generis aduersarius — laus enim inferioris substantiae uiri condemnatio eius est, qui de statu superiore

But perhaps someone may say: how was the hand of God in the parricide or the incest, when that is the enemy's work? Let us learn, then, that even where the devil wounds, the arrows of the Lord are said to wound. Indeed so we read that, when in the council of the angels the Lord, turning to the devil, praised holy Job his servant, so that the envious adversary of the human race might be burned (for the praise of a man of lower substance is the condemnation of him who was cast down from a higher state),

37.21.2CSEL 64:152

deiectus est —, responderit diabolus, quia non gratis Iob dominum ueneraretur qui nutu dei omnibus abundaret. sed mitte, inquit, manum tuam et tange omnia quae habet; uideamus si non in faciem te benedicit. et deus potestatem dedit diabolo, ut mitteret manum suam in omnia quae haberet Iob. quibus gestis cum sanctus Iob in sua fortitudine permaneret, quia non est motus Iob aut in interitu filiorum aut dispendio facultatum, iterum dominus ad diabolum dixit inludens ei, quod dissipasset omnia quae habuerat Iob, filios

the devil answered that Job did not worship the Lord for nothing, who by God's will abounded in all things. "But put out," he says, "your hand and touch all that he has; let us see whether he will not bless you to your face." And God gave the devil power to put out his hand on all that Job had. When this was done and holy Job remained in his fortitude, because Job was not moved either by the death of his sons or by the loss of his means, the Lord again said to the devil, mocking him, that he had scattered all that Job had and killed his sons,

37.21.3CSEL 64:152–153

eius interemisset, ipsum tamen nequaquam mouere de uirtutis statione potuisset. et ille respondit: quaecumque habet homo pro anima sua dabit. sed mitte, inquit, manum tuam et tange carnem et ossa eius. et accepit iterum potestatem, ut mitteret manum suam in corpus eius, tamen ut animam ipsius custodiret, et perfudit ulceribus sanctum Iob, ubi est egressus a domino. aduertimus ergo, quod manus domini dicatur, ubi est hominis diabolo infestante temptatio, siquidem et Iob manum domini dixit esse quae se tetigerit et sagittas domini esse memorauit sagittas piratarum: et tradidit, inquit, me in manus iniusti.

yet could by no means move him from his station of virtue. And he answered: "Whatever a man has he will give for his soul. But put out," he says, "your hand and touch his flesh and bones." And he received power again to put out his hand on his body, yet so as to keep his soul, and he covered holy Job with sores when he went out from the Lord. We note, then, that it is called the hand of the Lord where there is the temptation of a man with the devil attacking, since Job too said it was the hand of the Lord that had touched him, and called the arrows of the robbers the arrows of the Lord: "And he has handed me over," he says, "into the hands of the unjust."

37.21.4CSEL 64:153

ipse itaque absoluit, quia, cum diabolus uulnerat, domini sunt sagittae, qui uulnerandi permisit diabolo potestatem. denique si mandes, ut tuus seruulus uerberetur, nonne, etiamsi ab alio adstante caedatur, a te dicitur uerberatus? est et illa ratio, quia dominus ideo dat temptatori potestatem, ut hominum in temptationibus probetur affectus; ideo fit persecutio, ut fides luceat, uirtus excellat, mens interna omnibus manifestetur.

He himself, then, resolved it: because, when the devil wounds, the arrows are the Lord's, who allowed the devil power to wound. Indeed, if you order your slave to be beaten, is he not said to be beaten by you, even if he is struck by another standing by? There is also this reason: the Lord gives the tempter power so that men's affection may be proved in temptations; persecution happens so that faith may shine, virtue excel, the inner mind be shown to all.

Explanation 37, chapter 22

37.22.1CSEL 64:153

Ergo temptatio quasi sagitta penetrat interiora hominis et quasi gladius dei qui scrutatur interna. gladius autem uerbum est dei ualidum et acutius omni gladio acutissimo. de quo gladio audi dicentem Mariae: et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius, ut reuelentur multorum cordium cogitationes.

So temptation penetrates the inner parts of man like an arrow, and like the sword of God which searches inward things. And the sword is the word of God, powerful and sharper than any sharpest sword. Of this sword hear one saying to Mary: "And a sword will pierce your own soul, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed."

37.22.2CSEL 64:153

uerbo enim dei omnia reuelantur, in cuius conspectu nuda et aperta sunt omnia. anima ipsa diuiditur, medullae interiores cogitationesque manifestae sunt, nec ulla postremo est creatura, ut scriptura dicit, quae se a cognitione eius abscondat. ergo uendamus omnia, ut uerbum emamus, ipsum in nostris uisceribus recondamus.

For by the word of God all things are revealed, in whose sight all things are naked and open. The soul itself is divided, the inner marrow and the thoughts are made manifest; in short, "there is no creature," as Scripture says, that hides itself from his knowledge. Let us sell all things, then, to buy the Word, and store him in our inmost parts.

Explanation 37, chapter 23

37.23.1CSEL 64:153

Ipse postremo diabolus testificatur, quia omnia dat homo quae habet pro anima sua, nec dignum illud pretium totius patrimonii pro redemptione unius animae confitetur. quid parcimus patrimonio, quod et ipse diabolus uile iudicat pro salute? parum dixi pro salute; parum esse et pro errore testatur.

Lastly, the devil himself testifies that a man gives all he has for his soul, and confesses that the price of a whole patrimony is not worthy for the redemption of one soul. Why do we spare a patrimony which even the devil judges cheap for salvation? I have said too little with "for salvation": he testifies it is little even for error.

37.23.2CSEL 64:153–154

denique haec omnia, inquit, tibi dabo, si procidens adoraueris me, nec solum diuitias mundi, sed etiam honores et regna monstrauit. si tanto constat, ut diabolus adoretur, quantum christianus debet offerre, ut cum Christo resuscitetur? sed diabolum dimittamus quasi hircum emissionis in desertum; neque enim fidelis assertor est ueritatis, etsi aliquando transfiguret se in angelum lucis.

Indeed: "All these," he says, "I will give you, if you fall down and worship me," and he showed not only the riches of the world but honors and kingdoms. If it costs so much for the devil to be worshipped, how much ought a Christian to offer to be raised with Christ? But let us send the devil away like the scapegoat into the desert; for he is not a faithful witness of truth, even if he sometimes transforms himself into an angel of light.

Explanation 37, chapter 24

37.24.1CSEL 64:154

Abundant nobis diuinarum testimonia scripturarum, quibus instruimur nihil esse in homine pretiosius fide, nullum tantum esse patrimonium, quod salutis nostrae atque animae pretio conferatur. fide Abraham patriam suam reliquit et terram et proximos etiam quos uidebat, et eum quem non uidebat tamquam aspiciens sequebatur;

The testimonies of the divine Scriptures abound for us, by which we are taught that nothing in man is more precious than faith, that no patrimony is so great as to be compared with the price of our salvation and soul. By faith Abraham left his country and land and neighbors too whom he saw, and followed him whom he did not see as though seeing him;

37.24.2CSEL 64:154

Moyses quoque pretium animae suae maius omnibus Aegypti diuitiis aestimauit. quid de uiris sublimibus loquor? Raab meretrix, alienigena illa de saeculo, tamen animam suam non solum contemptu omnium quae habebat, sed etiam uitae periculis putauit esse redimendam, quae exploratores Iesu Naue ciuibus suis quaerentibus denegauit et hostes patriae, legatos tamen fidei maluit occultare quam prodere.

Moses too judged the price of his soul greater than all the riches of Egypt. Why speak of sublime men? Rahab the harlot, that foreigner of the world, yet thought her soul must be redeemed not only by contempt of all she had but even by the dangers of her life; she refused the spies of Joshua son of Nun to her citizens who sought them, and preferred to hide rather than betray those who were enemies of her country yet envoys of faith.

37.24.3CSEL 64:154

non eam minae ciuium, non bellorum pericula, non incendia patriae, non suorum discrimina terruerunt. disce, uir, disce, christiane, quomodo uerum Iesum sequi debeas, quando femina contempsit omnia sua et Iesum in figura propter similitudinem nominis est secuta. unde praeclare Salomon dixit: diuitiae uiri redemptio animae eius. redime ergo animam tuam. uilis est pecunia, sed fit pretiosa per fidem; uilis est cum conditur, pretiosa cum dispergitur; sic enim scriptum est: dispersit, dedit pauperibus, iustitia eius manet in aeternum.

Neither the threats of the citizens, nor the dangers of war, nor the burning of her country, nor the perils of her family terrified her. Learn, man, learn, Christian, how you ought to follow the true Jesus, when a woman despised all her things and followed Jesus in figure because of the likeness of the name. Hence Solomon excellently said: "The riches of a man are the ransom of his soul." Ransom, then, your soul. Money is cheap, but becomes precious through faith; cheap when hoarded, precious when scattered; for so it is written: "He has scattered, he has given to the poor; his justice remains for ever."

Explanation 37, chapter 25

37.25.1CSEL 64:154–155

Si igitur talis fueris, ut possis contemnere non solum omnia tua, sed etiam ipsam carnem tuam pro iustitia, qua nulla potest locupletior esse possessio — possessio enim pretiosa homo mundus —, etsi flumina te superiora concluserint, transis, etsi dederit temptandi tui dominus potestatem, mandat tamen diabolo ut animam ipse custodiat, secundum quod scriptum est: ut destruas inimicum et defensorem; temptat enim ut aduersarius, defendit ut seruus.

If, then, you are such that you can despise not only all your things but even your very flesh for justice, than which no possession can be richer (for a clean man is a precious possession), even if the upper rivers shut you in, you pass through; even if the Lord has given power to tempt you, yet he commands the devil to keep your soul himself, according to what is written: "to destroy the enemy and the defender"; for he tempts as an adversary and defends as a servant.

37.25.2CSEL 64:155

scriptum est enim: et uolet tibi unicornuus seruire. seruit enim qui non ex uoluntate sua quod optat exequitur, sed ex necessitate mandatis imperialibus inuitus obtemperat. uide altitudinem Christi, qui retorsit in diabolum malitiae suae pretium. ille nos cogit quod odio habemus hoc facere; non enim quod uolo hoc ago, ut apostolus dixit, sed quod odi illud facio. retorsit in illum dominus, ut et ipse plerumque non faciat quod uult, sed quod odit hoc faciat; denique animam quam uult expugnare custodit.

For it is written: "And will the unicorn be willing to serve you?" For he serves who carries out what he desires not by his own will but, by necessity, unwillingly obeys imperial commands. See the depth of Christ, who turned back on the devil the price of his malice. He forces us to do what we hate; for "I do not do what I want," as the apostle said, "but what I hate, that I do." The Lord turned it back on him, so that he too often does not what he wants but what he hates; in short, he guards the soul he wants to conquer.

37.25.3CSEL 64:155

nos corruptelam carnis condemnamus et sequimur ut illa uidua, quae promissam marito fidem irritam fecit et postea nubere uult, quod ante fugiebat. ille inimicus est sanctis et defensor adhibetur, quo amplius puniatur, ut nocere non audeat qui nocere desiderat. et quanto tolerabilius est amare uirtutes, etsi implere non possis, quam odisse uirtutes, quibus nocere non possis!

We condemn the corruption of the flesh and follow it, like that widow who made void the faith promised to her husband and afterwards wants to marry, which before she fled. He is an enemy to the saints and is employed as a defender, so that he may be punished the more, not daring to harm though he desires to harm. And how much more bearable it is to love the virtues, even if you cannot fulfil them, than to hate virtues you cannot harm!

Explanation 37, chapter 26

37.26.1CSEL 64:155–156

Non est, inquit, sanitas in carne mea a uultu irae tuae. exposuit nobis hunc locum Esaias: iratus es, et nos peccauimus. qui est tamen irae domini uultus? ne forte ille, quia oculi domini super facientes mala? si enim oculi domini super iustos, quomodo a uultu irae dei infirmatur propheta? unde et illud considera, quod ipse Dauid in posterioribus dixit: quoniam ex omnibus tribulationibus eripuisti me et super inimicos meos respexit oculus tuus.

"There is no health in my flesh," he says, "from the face of your anger." Isaiah explained this place for us: "You were angry, and we sinned." Yet what is the face of the Lord's anger? Is it perhaps that "the eyes of the Lord are upon those who do evil"? For if the eyes of the Lord are on the just, how is the prophet weakened from the face of God's anger? Hence consider also what David himself said in later psalms: "For you have rescued me from all tribulations, and your eye has looked upon my enemies."

37.26.2CSEL 64:156

sicut enim bona iustorum respicit, ita et peccatorum occulta deprehendit. nisi forte ad Christum hoc referas, qui ab omnibus a quibus conterebatur ereptus est, quando se exuit a populo Iudaeorum, qui eum frequentibus sacrilegiis et cotidianis impietatibus conterebant, et inimicos suos uocauit ad gratiam, quos oculus dei uidit et amauit. ergo quia pius est deus, nequaquam est desperandum; etsi irascitur, ignoscit, etsi percutit, sanat, etsi tradit in interitum carnem, spiritum saluat. noli ergo timere carnis infirmitatem, quia sanctus, cum infirmatur, potentior est.

For as he looks on the good things of the just, so he detects the hidden things of sinners. Unless perhaps you refer this to Christ, who was rescued from all by whom he was crushed, when he stripped himself from the Jewish people, who crushed him with frequent sacrileges and daily impieties, and called his enemies to grace, whom the eye of God saw and loved. Since God is loving, then, there is no reason to despair; even if he is angry, he forgives; even if he strikes, he heals; even if he hands the flesh over to destruction, he saves the spirit. Do not fear, then, the weakness of the flesh, because the saint, when weak, is stronger.

Explanation 37, chapter 27

37.27.1CSEL 64:156

Quid autem est quod ait: non est pax ossibus meis a facie peccatorum meorum? quae sunt ista ossa? utrum animae an corporis? sed non tanta esset doloris cura corporei ubi et anima laborat, cum sancti sit uelle carnem propter animam flagellari, sicut se flagellabat et Paulus, ne eius reprobaretur assertio.. sunt quaedam interioris ossa hominis sicut et membra sunt cetera, oculi mentis et nares, sicut Iob dixit: spiritus diuinus qui est in naribus meis.

And what is it he says: "There is no peace for my bones from the face of my sins"? What are these bones? Of the soul or of the body? But there would not be such care for bodily pain where the soul too suffers, since it is the saint's will that the flesh be scourged for the soul's sake, as Paul too scourged himself, lest his preaching be rejected. There are certain bones of the inner man, just as there are other members, eyes of the mind and nostrils, as Job said: "the divine spirit which is in my nostrils."

37.27.2CSEL 64:156–157

sunt ergo et ossa, quibus caritatis quaedam compago formatur. unde et Adam dixit de consorte caritatis et coherede gratiae uitae: hoc nunc os de ossibus meis et caro de carne mea, quod apostolus interpretatus ait: sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in ecclesia. Christi autem et ecclesiae sacramentum non carnale, sed spiritale esse quis dubitet, cum bonus quisque in ipso coniugio non carnis, sed uirtutis decore teneatur et mores diligat in uxore, non usus? denique audi, quia non secundum carnem loquitur, sed secundum uirtutem interiorem: non est absconditum os meum quod fecisti in abscondito. uirtus itaque, non caro est, quae dei patris nouit abscondita.

There are, then, bones by which a kind of framework of love is formed. Hence Adam too said of his partner in love and co-heir of the grace of life: "This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh," which the apostle interpreted, saying: "This mystery is great, but I speak of Christ and the church." And who would doubt that the mystery of Christ and the church is not carnal but spiritual, since every good man, even in marriage itself, is held not by the beauty of the flesh but of virtue, and loves the character in his wife, not her use? Indeed hear that he speaks not according to the flesh but according to inner virtue: "My bone is not hidden from you, which you made in secret." It is virtue, then, not flesh, that knows the hidden things of God the Father.

Explanation 37, chapter 28

37.28.1CSEL 64:157

Ergo non est pax animae uirtutibus, quando ante oculos nobis nostra peccata concurrunt et offundunt se mentibus nostris. et hoc bene interpretatus est gentium doctor electus in epistula secunda ad Corinthios dicens: nam et cum uenissemus in Macedoniam, nullam requiem habuit caro nostra, sed in omnibus sumus afflicti; foris pugnae, intus timores.

There is no peace, then, for the virtues of the soul when our sins run together before our eyes and spread themselves over our minds. And this the chosen teacher of the Gentiles explained well in the second epistle to the Corinthians, saying: "For even when we had come into Macedonia, our flesh had no rest, but we were afflicted in every way: fightings without, fears within."

37.28.2CSEL 64:157

illum Macedonum peccata uexabant; quanto magis propria unumquemque nostrum peccata perturbant, ut requies nobis esse non possit! grauior aduersaria nobis culpa est nostra, quae sollicitat otiosos, affligit sanos, contristat laetos, inquietat placidos, exagitat mites, excitat dormientes. rei sumus sine accusante, sine torquente cruciamur, sine uinculis astringimur, sine uenditore seruimus.

The sins of the Macedonians troubled him; how much more do each one's own sins disturb us, so that there can be no rest for us! Our own guilt is a heavier adversary to us, which troubles the idle, afflicts the healthy, saddens the glad, disquiets the calm, harasses the gentle, wakes the sleeping. We are defendants without an accuser, tormented without a torturer, bound without chains, slaves without a seller.

37.28.3CSEL 64:157

unde et scriptura dicit: peccatis uestris uenditi estis. haec igitur peccata sunt quae contra nos semper sunt, ut dixit propheta: uendiderunt nos et dominantur nobis. seruus qui uenditur superiore seruitio exit, ut ad dominum alterum migret; nos nec superiorum iugum deponimus et ad noua peccata curuamur.

Hence Scripture too says: "By your sins you have been sold." These, then, are the sins which are always against us, as the prophet said: "They sold us and they rule over us." A slave who is sold leaves his former service to pass to another master; we neither lay down the yoke of the former and bend to new sins.

Explanation 37, chapter 29

37.29.1CSEL 64:157–158

Unde ingemuit sanctus dicens: quoniam iniquitates meae superposuerunt caput meum, sicut onus graue grauatae sunt super me, hoc est: iniquitates meae supertransierunt caput meum et supereminent mihi, ut sensus meos deprimant; oculi enim sapientis in capite eius. et ideo Nabal malus erat et durus, quia sensus eius malitia et iniquitas obserabant. unde et Abigaeae uerbum ferre non potuit, sed obduruit cor eius et quasi infirmus occubuit.

Hence the saint groaned, saying: "For my iniquities have gone over my head; like a heavy burden they have weighed upon me," that is: my iniquities have passed over my head and tower above me, so as to press down my senses; for "the eyes of the wise man are in his head." And so Nabal was evil and hard, because malice and iniquity locked up his senses. Hence he could not bear Abigail's word, but his heart hardened and he died like a sick man.

37.29.2CSEL 64:158

aut uide ne hoc sit caput, de quo ait apostolus, quia non tenet illud mente carnis inflatus. hoc autem caput Christus est, quia omnis uiri caput Christus. hoc est caput, quod per conpaginationes et conligationes totius plebis crescit in incrementum dei, quia in omnibus nobis per singula membra sua Christus assurgit. ergo quando ingrauant nostra peccata et talento quodam iniquitatis plumbeo ad terrena deprimimur, disrumpamus uincula eorum et abiciamus a nobis iugum ipsorum, ut possimus oculos mentis nostrae adtollere et audire dicentem:

Or see whether this is not the head of which the apostle says that he does not hold it, puffed up by the mind of the flesh. And this head is Christ, for the head of every man is Christ. This is the head which, through the joints and bonds of the whole people, grows with the increase of God, because in all of us Christ rises up through each of his members. So when our sins weigh us down and we are pressed to earthly things by a kind of leaden talent of iniquity, let us break their chains and cast their yoke from us, so that we can lift up the eyes of our mind and hear one saying:

37.29.3CSEL 64:158

uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. denique Aegyptum auaritia onerabat, pecunia uexabat mercatus Aethiopum, sicut scriptum est: laborauit Aegyptus et mercatus Aethiopum, et Sabaim uiri excelsi ad te transibunt. laborauit Aegyptus, antequam cognosceret ueritatem, sed iam non laborat, postquam transiuit ad Christum. secuntur uolentes Sabaei uiri qui ante fugiebant, quia tenent eos uincula caritatis, quae adamante fortiora sunt. pulchre et illud Esaiae huic loco aptatur: omne caput in dolore et omne cor in maestitia. a

"Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you." Indeed avarice burdened Egypt, the trade of the Ethiopians troubled it with money, as it is written: "Egypt has labored, and the trade of the Ethiopians, and the Sabeans, tall men, will pass over to you." Egypt labored before it knew the truth, but it labors no longer since it passed over to Christ. The Sabean men who once fled now follow willingly, because the chains of love hold them, which are stronger than adamant. Isaiah's saying too fits this place finely: "Every head in pain and every heart in sadness. From

37.29.4CSEL 64:158–159

pedibus usque ad caput non est uulnus neque cicatrix neque plaga cum feruore. feruet enim iniquitas, cum dominatur super caput nostrum sese extollens et locum occupans, ne eum Christus magister teneat paenitentiae. non mediocrem uim habent istae iniquitates, si consideres hominem illum iniquitatis, qui uenturus est secundum opera satanae in omni uirtute et signis et prodigiis mendacibus et omni seductione iniquitatis, quem cauendum nobis apostolus demonstrauit, quia operationem erroris accipiet, ut probentur fideles, iudicentur infidi.

the feet to the head there is no wound nor scar nor festering sore." For iniquity festers when it rules over our head, exalting itself and occupying the place, so that Christ, the teacher of penance, may not hold it. These iniquities have no small force, if you consider that man of iniquity who is to come according to the working of Satan with all power and lying signs and wonders and every seduction of iniquity, whom the apostle showed must be guarded against, because he will receive the working of error, so that the faithful may be proved and the faithless judged.

Explanation 37, chapter 30

37.30.1CSEL 64:159

Merito ergo sub iniquitatibus posito sibi et, quod peius est, suis computuisse et computruisse dicit cicatrices suas a facie insipientiae suae, quia leuantem onera iniquitatum tardius remedium sequebatur. tamen et Iob sancto, qui saniem radebat suorum ulcerum perfusus ulceribus a pedibus usque ad caput, sanitas est refusa et Lazarus pauper, qui iacebat ad ianuas diuitis lambentibus ulcera eius canibus, de cicatricum suarum faetore sublatus ab angelis in Abrahae sinu est collocatus. est ergo in sancto Dauid spes et remedium sanitatis, quia non unguentum redolent, sed faetorem suorum uulnera peccatorum et quia affligitur his atque curuatur et non delectatur.

Rightly, then, placed under iniquities, he says that his scars have rotted and festered for himself and, what is worse, for his own, from the face of his foolishness, because the remedy followed late on one carrying the burdens of iniquities. Yet health was poured back into holy Job too, who scraped the pus of his sores, covered with sores from his feet to his head; and Lazarus the poor man, who lay at the rich man's gate while the dogs licked his sores, was taken from the stench of his scars by angels and placed in Abraham's bosom. There is, then, in holy David hope and a remedy of health, because the wounds of his sins smell not of ointment but of stench, and because he is afflicted and bowed down by them and does not delight in them.

37.30.2CSEL 64:159–160

specta nunc epheborum aliquem lasciuum et egregie libidinosum, qui in stupris uitam suam exigat, more illius diuitis in bysso et ostro iacentem atque epulantem cotidie splendide, cui natent pauimenta uino, tegatur humus floribus et spinis cooperta piscium incensis diuersorum thymiamatum odoribus triclinia compleantur, quemadmodum se beatum putet et bene se olere iudicet, cum grauia atque diuturna animae suae uulnera gerat et corruptum sanguinem fluat, nullum tamen faetorem suae cicatricis accipiat. obstructas caeno nares habet nec potest dicere: spiritus diuinus qui est in naribus meis. ideo diues ille remedium salutis inuenire non potuit, pauper inuenit; denique alter apud inferos in supplicio, alter in requie.

Look now at some young man, wanton and exceedingly lustful, who spends his life in debauchery, in the manner of that rich man lying in fine linen and purple and feasting splendidly every day, whose floors swim with wine, whose ground is covered with flowers, and whose dining rooms, the fish-bones covered, are filled with the burnt odors of various incenses: how he thinks himself blessed and judges that he smells sweet, when he bears grave and long-standing wounds of his soul and runs with corrupt blood, yet perceives no stench of his scar. He has nostrils blocked with mud and cannot say: "the divine spirit which is in my nostrils." So that rich man could not find the remedy of salvation; the poor man found it; in the end one is in torment in the underworld, the other in rest.

Explanation 37, chapter 31

37.31.1CSEL 64:160

Inuenit ergo perpetuae salutis remedium etiam sanctus propheta Dauid, qui faetere sibi animae suae uulnera fatebatur et a facie insipientiae suae conputruisse sibi cicatrices proprias loquebatur. sed est et insipientia, quae per stultitiam praedicationis credentibus salutem afferat. refugit ergo propheta euangelico iam spiritu

The holy prophet David, then, found the remedy of everlasting salvation, who confessed that the wounds of his soul stank to him and said that his scars had rotted from the face of his foolishness. But there is also a foolishness which through the foolishness of preaching brings salvation to those who believe. The prophet, then, already with the gospel spirit, shuns

37.31.2CSEL 64:160

sapientiam istius mundi qua non cognoscitur deus, quae tegit sua uulnera, non reuelat ad dominum. melior igitur insipientia quae oculos habet, ut uideat ulcera sua, quam sapientia quae non habet. et ideo insipientiae suae obtutu ammonitus spiritali tantus rex afflictum se miseriis protestatur, ut remedium possit paenitentiae repperire, quod Iudas, qui agrum de iniquitatis mercede possedit, repperire non potuit.

the wisdom of this world, by which God is not known, which covers its wounds and does not reveal them to the Lord. Better, then, is the foolishness that has eyes to see its sores than the wisdom that has none. And so, warned by the spiritual sight of his foolishness, so great a king declares himself afflicted by miseries, so as to find the remedy of penance, which Judas, who possessed a field from the reward of iniquity, could not find.

Explanation 37, chapter 32

37.32.1CSEL 64:160

Miseriis, inquit, afflictus sum et curuatus sum usque ad finem, tota die contristatus ingrediebar. usque in quem finem se dicit esse curuatum: utrum legitimum in finem paenitentiae aut amplius, ut mystice intellegamus, usque ad Christum qui finis est legis, qui se passus est lapidari, passus est corpus suum mortuum uulnerari?

"By miseries," he says, "I was afflicted and bowed down to the end; all day long I went about sad." To what end does he say he was bowed down: to the lawful end of penance, or further, that we may understand it mystically, even to Christ, who is the end of the law, who allowed himself to be stoned, allowed his dead body to be wounded?

37.32.2CSEL 64:160–161

sed nullum faetorem paenitentiae, sed odorem gratiae uulnera illa redolebant. denique non tabes mortis de uulnere eius, sicut hominum ceterorum, sed fons uitae scaturiuit aeternae, ut scriptura nos edocet dicens: et saliet aqua cum delectatione de fontibus salutaris. exiliuit ergo de uulnere aqua, ut nos biberemus salutem; bibent omnes peccatores terrae, ut peccata deponant. uide singula. miseriis afflictus est Christus, ut beatos faceret homines qui erant in miseriis constituti. nemo miserum eum qui sit iustus appellet, quia ipse dixit: uos nemo faciet miseros, curuatus est ille, ut nos erigeremur; contristatus est ille, ut nos laetificaret, secundum quod scriptum est: si enim ego contristo uos, et quis est qui me laetificet nisi qui contristatur ex me?

But those wounds smelled not of the stench of penance but of the fragrance of grace. Indeed not the decay of death, as with other men, but the fountain of eternal life gushed from his wound, as Scripture teaches us, saying: "And water will leap up with delight from the fountains of salvation." Water leapt from the wound, then, so that we might drink salvation; all the sinners of the earth will drink, so as to lay down their sins. See each point. Christ was afflicted with miseries, so as to make blessed the men who were set in miseries. Let no one call a just man miserable, because he himself said: "No one will make you miserable." He was bowed down so that we might be raised up; he was saddened so as to gladden us, according to what is written: "For if I sadden you, who is it that gladdens me but he who is saddened by me?"

37.32.3CSEL 64:161

qui contristatur ergo ex domino Iesu Christo ipse laetificat Christum et ipse laetificatur a Christo. ideo ergo et nos non perfunctorie satisfaciendum a nobis esse cognoscimus. curuemur usque in finem, id est non solum Christo fidem, sed etiam passionum nostrarum perseuerantiam deferentes, et gaudeamus in passionibus nostris, sicut et Christus gaudebat in passionibus suis. quas ille suscipiebat pro seruulis suis, nos subeamus pro domino.

He, then, who is saddened by the Lord Jesus Christ himself gladdens Christ and is himself gladdened by Christ. And so we too know that we must not make satisfaction carelessly. Let us be bowed down to the end, that is, bringing to Christ not only faith but also perseverance in our sufferings, and let us rejoice in our sufferings, as Christ too rejoiced in his sufferings. Those he undertook for his servants, let us undergo for the Lord.

37.32.4CSEL 64:161

hic ergo finis, ut adimpleam, inquit, quae desunt tribulationum Christi in carne mea pro corpore eius, quae est ecclesia, cuius sum factus minister. uidemus quid nobis suscipiendum sit, qui ministerium sacerdotale suscipimus, ut non solum pro nobis, sed etiam pro ecclesia domini sustinere fortiter passiones corporis debeamus. Dauid autem addidit et animae passiones.

This, then, is the end: "that I may fill up," he says, "what is lacking of the tribulations of Christ in my flesh for his body, which is the church, of which I have been made a minister." We see what we must undertake, who undertake the priestly ministry: that we ought to bear bravely the sufferings of the body not only for ourselves but also for the Lord's church. But David added the sufferings of the soul too.

Explanation 37, chapter 33

37.33.1CSEL 64:161

Denique ipse ait: quoniam anima mea completa est inlusionibus et non est sanitas in carne mea. incuruatus sum et humiliatus sum nimis, rugiebam a gemitu cordis mei. et ante te omne desiderium meum et gemitus meus non est absconditus a te. cor meum conturbatum est et deseruit me fortitudo mea, et lumen oculorum meorum non est mecum. aduertimus igitur laborem animae maiorem esse quam carnis.

Indeed he says: "For my soul is filled with mockeries, and there is no health in my flesh. I am bowed down and humbled exceedingly; I roared from the groaning of my heart. And before you is all my desire, and my groaning is not hidden from you. My heart is troubled and my strength has left me, and the light of my eyes is not with me." We note, then, that the labor of the soul is greater than that of the flesh.

37.33.2CSEL 64:161–162

denique quibus anima inlusionibus compleatur intellege, eo quod in temptationibus diabolus ei uideatur inludere et insultare quasi grauiter laboranti. Symmachus tamen ait lumbos, in quibus seminaria sunt generationis humanae. unde praecinctos lumbos habere te praecipit sapientia dei, ne tua castimonia resoluatur. denique ut scias, quia in lumbis sint libidinis commotiones quae plerumque excitantur a diabolo, quando contendit dissipare membra Christi et facere

In short, understand with what mockeries the soul is filled: that in temptations the devil seems to mock and insult it as it labors heavily. Symmachus, however, says "loins," in which are the seeds of human generation. Hence the wisdom of God bids you have your loins girded, lest your chastity be loosened. And so that you may know that in the loins are the stirrings of lust, which are often roused by the devil when he strives to scatter the members of Christ and make them

37.33.3CSEL 64:162

membra meretricis, ecce, inquit, fortitudo eius in lumbis et uirtus eius in utero. in lumbis uiri semina sunt, in utero autem feminae. inludit ergo diabolus in his, ut faciat adulterium incestum fornicationes. et ideo qui fornicatur in corpus suum peccat, non extra corpus, primum quia infirmatur caro, quae in libidinibus diffluit et non seruat moderamina castitatis, deinde quoniam seminaria, quae

members of a harlot: "Behold," he says, "his strength is in his loins and his power in his belly." In the man's loins are the seeds, in the woman's womb. So the devil mocks in these, to make adultery, incest, fornications. And so "he who commits fornication sins against his own body," not outside the body: first because the flesh is weakened, which dissolves in lusts and does not keep the restraints of chastity; then because the seeds which

37.33.4CSEL 64:162

debent suboli proficere procreandae, inquinamentum corporis, non fructum posteritatis operantur. illae itaque dicuntur inlusiones, fortasse quod in his corporis aestus sine coitus celebritate frequenter inludat. unde bene Septuaginta uiri animae inlusiones dixerunt eo quod diabolus affectus alicuius inludens in uanum studeat uires eius effundere uirtutemque uacuare, resoluere fortitudinem.

should serve to beget offspring work the defilement of the body, not the fruit of posterity. Those, then, are called mockeries, perhaps because in them the heat of the body often mocks without the act of union. Hence the Seventy rightly called them mockeries of the soul, because the devil, mocking someone's affection, strives in vain to pour out its strength, empty its virtue, loosen its fortitude.

37.33.5CSEL 64:162

ideoque alibi ait: et renes mei resoluti sunt. in quo nos etiam beatus confirmat apostolus, quod non inlusiones animae, non carnis infirmitatem metuere debeamus, quia et animae et corporis nostri Christus est uirtus, qui curat aegrotos quasi medicus, confirmat inualidos quasi omnium fortitudo. denique etsi foris homo noster corrumpitur, sed renouatur interior de die in diem.

And so elsewhere he says: "And my reins are loosened." In this the blessed apostle too confirms us, that we should fear not the weakness of the flesh but the mockeries of the soul, because Christ is the strength both of our soul and body, who cures the sick as a physician and strengthens the weak as the strength of all. Indeed, "even if our outer man is corrupted, yet the inner is renewed day by day."

Explanation 37, chapter 34

37.34.1CSEL 64:162–163

His itaque animae inlusionibus fatigatus incuruauerat et humiliauerat se nimis sanctus Dauid, non quo iniquitatibus superponentibus se supra caput eius, ut diximus, locum daret aut inimico cederet, qui in posterioribus docet ei non esse cedendum dicens: quanta maligne operatus est inimicus in sanctis tuis! et gloriati sunt qui oderant te in medio festi tui. posuerunt signa sua signa et non cognoui sicut in uia supra summum. quasi in silua lignorum securibus conciderunt ianuas eius.

Wearied, then, by these mockeries of the soul, holy David had bowed down and humbled himself exceedingly, not so as to give place to iniquities placing themselves over his head, as we said, or to yield to the enemy, who teaches in later psalms that one must not yield, saying: "How much evil the enemy has worked in your holy places! And those who hated you have boasted in the midst of your feast. They set up their signs as signs, and I did not know, as on the way above the summit. As in a wood of trees they cut down its doors with axes."

37.34.2CSEL 64:163

inimicis meis, inquit, signa iniquitatis suae supra summum ponentibus — quod est summum nisi caput tuum, ubi sensus sunt, ubi Christus est sapientia? — ego non cognoui, id est non adquieui, non his consensi et meae sententiam cogitationis adiunxi. unde et alibi: non cognoui uerbum nequam et declinantes a me malignos non cognoscebam. denique cum omnia nouerit Christus, peccatum non cognouit; cognoscit enim quae sua sunt, id est quae uirtutum sunt, non quae flagitiorum.

When my enemies, he says, set up the signs of their iniquity above the summit (and what is the summit but your head, where the senses are, where Christ is wisdom?), I did not know them, that is, I did not acquiesce, did not consent to them and add the judgment of my thought. Hence elsewhere too: "I did not know the wicked word, and the malicious who turned from me I did not know." Indeed, though Christ knows all things, he did not know sin; for he knows what is his, that is, what belongs to the virtues, not what belongs to shameful deeds.

37.34.3CSEL 64:163

ideoque scriptura tibi dicit: cognouit dominus qui sunt ipsius, iniquis autem dicit: discedite a me, quia non noui uos, et per Hieremiam locutus est dicens: sicut agnus ductus sum ad immolandum et nesciui. quomodo nesciebat quod futurum ante praedixerat? sed nesciui, inquit, cogitationes eorum, malitiam eorum, nolo scire quae sanguinis sunt; denique non congregabo conuenticula eorum de sanguinibus.

And so Scripture says to you: "The Lord knows those who are his," and to the wicked he says: "Depart from me, for I do not know you," and through Jeremiah he spoke, saying: "Like a lamb I was led to the slaughter, and I did not know." How did he not know what he had foretold would come? But I did not know, he says, their thoughts, their malice; I will not know what is of blood; indeed, "I will not gather their assemblies from blood."

37.34.4CSEL 64:163

deleo iniquitates eorum et memor non sum, nolo scire quae remissurus adueni. non cognoui ligna quae ardeant nec quae in aceruo lignorum sunt posita uel stipulam uel faenum, ut citius ea nutrimentis suis flamma consumat. illa uolo scire quae maneant, ut fructum suae mercedis accipiant.

I blot out their iniquities and do not remember; I will not know what I came to forgive. I did not know the wood that is to burn, nor what is placed in the pile of wood, either stubble or hay, so that the flame may consume them sooner with its fuel. I will know those things that remain, so that they may receive the fruit of their reward.

37.34.5CSEL 64:163–164

illa uolo scire quae supra fundamentum aedificata sunt, ut meliorentur, non quae in uia, ubi ea diripiant transeuntes. illa uolo scire quae uitis sunt, illa certa ligna quae ferant fructum, non quae in fasce collecta ad incendium praeparantur; id est: non sum illis arbiter et socius quae caduca sunt. non ergo societas alicuius rei, sed societas criminosa in culpa est.

I will know those things that are built on the foundation, so that they may be improved, not those on the way, where passers-by snatch them. I will know those things that belong to the vine, those sure trees that bear fruit, not those gathered in a bundle and prepared for burning; that is: I am not judge and partner of those things that are perishable. It is not, then, partnership in any thing, but criminal partnership that is in fault.

Explanation 37, chapter 35

37.35.1CSEL 64:164

Qua ratione autem non cognouit in infructuosis et fragilibus gloriantes? quia malis operibus et iniquitatis suae securibus euertunt animae fidelis ingressus et crudelibus factis findunt piae mentis uestibula, ne per ea possit Christus intrare. debet autem unusquisque portas suas et ianuas custodire, ut, cum uenerit Christus et pulsauerit, dicant ministrae potestates quae praeeunt et praecurrunt:

For what reason, then, did he not know those who glory in fruitless and fragile things? Because with evil works and the axes of their iniquity they overturn the entrances of the faithful soul, and with cruel deeds split the porches of the pious mind, so that Christ cannot enter through them. Each one ought to guard his gates and doors, so that, when Christ comes and knocks, the ministering powers who go before and run ahead may say:

37.35.2CSEL 64:164

tollite portas, principes, uestras, et eleuamini, portae aeternales. uere principes qui se bene rexerint, ut in animas eorum Christo ingressus sit. simile quoque illud est Salomonis: si spiritus habentis potestatem ascenderit aduersum te, locum tuum non relinquas, quia cura mitigabit delicta magna. diligentia enim et fides superiorem locum tenent, inferiorem perfidia. ideo ascendat ad te bona diligentia, quae insidias excludit ini-

"Lift up your gates, O princes, and be lifted up, eternal gates." Truly princes are those who have ruled themselves well, so that Christ may enter into their souls. Like this too is Solomon's saying: "If the spirit of one who has power rises against you, do not leave your place, for care will soothe great offenses." For diligence and faith hold the higher place, faithlessness the lower. So let good diligence rise to you, which shuts out the enemy's

37.35.3CSEL 64:164–165

mici et aufert peccatum, ne malitia potestatem habentis nocere possit. in Canticis hanc uidit Ecclesiastes malitiam sub sole, hoc est in hoc mundo, unde et subsolanum locum hunc scriptura memorauit. sub sole ergo uidit, non supra solem, ubi pax angelorum est uel sanctitas caelestium potestatum. aut forte sub sole iniquitatis dixit; malitiae enim diabolus praesidet, uirtutibus Christus. itaque ut uinceret spiritum potestatem habentis, quam ad tempus accepit, incuruabat se in oratione Dauid ceruicem sicut circulum flectens et humiliabat in precibus; oratio enim se humiliantis nubes penetrat et elementorum alta transcendit, ut Christo appropinquet.

snares and takes away sin, so that the malice of the one who has power cannot harm. In "the Canticles" Ecclesiastes saw this malice under the sun, that is, in this world; hence Scripture also called this place the region under the sun. He saw it under the sun, then, not above the sun, where is the peace of angels or the holiness of the heavenly powers. Or perhaps he said "under the sun of iniquity"; for the devil presides over malice, Christ over the virtues. And so, to overcome the spirit of the one who has power, which he received for a time, David bowed himself in prayer, bending his neck like a ring, and humbled himself in his entreaties; for the prayer of one who humbles himself pierces the clouds and goes beyond the heights of the elements, so as to draw near to Christ.

Explanation 37, chapter 36

37.36.1CSEL 64:165

Et rugiebat a gemitu cordis sui. rugit qui gemitum solum, non uerba exprimit. haec est ergo illa praeclara oratio, quando interpellat pro nobis spiritus gemitibus inenarrabilibus, ut uas electionis asseruit. hic est gemitus quem non despicit deus, qui non despicit seruum iuniorem orbatum patre nec uiduam, si effundat loquelam.

"And I roared from the groaning of my heart." He roars who utters only a groan, not words. This, then, is that excellent prayer, when the Spirit intercedes for us with unutterable groanings, as the vessel of election declared. This is the groaning God does not despise, who does not despise the younger servant bereft of his father, nor the widow if she pours out her complaint.

Explanation 37, chapter 37

37.37.1CSEL 64:165

Gemitum ergo ante omnia signum spiritus sancti apostolus ponit, ut legimus. denique custodiamus animae nostrae ianuas, ne multiloquii securibus scindatur nostrae confessionis ingressus. nihil insolens et superbum nostro ex ore procedat nec securim leuemus aut malleum, quae non intrant in ecclesiam domini. claude ianuas, cum oras, ne se ingerat spiritus nequam, ut ibi peccatum extorqueat ubi lucrum uolumus pietatis adquirere.

So the apostle puts groaning, before all, as a sign of the Holy Spirit, as we read. Let us guard, then, the doors of our soul, lest the entrance of our confession be split by the axes of much speaking. Let nothing insolent and proud come from our mouth, nor let us raise the axe or hammer, which do not enter the church of the Lord. Shut the doors when you pray, lest the evil spirit thrust himself in, to extort sin where we wish to gain the profit of piety.

37.37.2CSEL 64:165–166

qui sic orat, non est a domino gemitus eius absconditus. denique Petri sancti gemitus et cognitus et exauditus est, quando fleuit amarissime; utique non lacrimae amarae, sed amarus qui eas fundebat affectus. in ipso perfido Achab gemitus inuenisset gratiam, nisi manens inuidia cumulasset offensam. non enim perfunctorius gemitus praedicatur, sed qui habet conuersionem; scriptum est enim: si conuersus ingemueris, saluus eris.

He who prays thus, his groaning is not hidden from the Lord. Indeed holy Peter's groaning was both known and heard when he wept most bitterly; not that the tears were bitter, but the feeling of him who shed them. Even in faithless Ahab groaning would have found grace, had not persistent envy heaped up the offense. For not a perfunctory groan is praised, but one that has conversion; for it is written: "If, turning, you groan, you will be saved."

Explanation 37, chapter 38

37.38.1CSEL 64:166

Constituamus etiam ante dominum omne desiderium nostrum. quid est desiderium? bonae enim rei legi desiderium: desiderio desideraui manducare hoc pascha uobiscum, et: ceruus desiderat ad fontes aquarum.

Let us also set before the Lord all our desire. What is desire? For I have read of desire for a good thing: "With desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you," and: "The deer desires the springs of waters."

37.38.2CSEL 64:166

puto autem, quod is qui paenitentiam gerit, qui se affligit, non bona sua debeat, sed commissa sibi enumerare peccata. denique uersiculis illis, ut arbitror, hoc docemur, quibus ait: deus, uitam meam nuntiabo tibi, posuisti lacrimas meas in conspectu tuo. non enim quasi innocentem uitam annuntiat, ubi lacrimae funduntur, quae solent legationem suscipere pro delictis. nisi forte sic intellegamus, quod, etsi innocens quisque sit, securus esse non possit, cui sint aduersus grauissimos hostes

But I think that he who does penance, who afflicts himself, ought to enumerate not his good things but the sins he has committed. Indeed by those verses, I think, we are taught this, where he says: "O God, I will declare my life to you; you have set my tears in your sight." For he does not proclaim his life as innocent where tears are shed, which usually undertake the embassy for offenses. Unless perhaps we understand it thus: that even if someone is innocent, he cannot be secure, who has against the gravest enemies

37.38.3CSEL 64:166

cotidiana certamina et ideo et ubi laeta lucet conscientia, tamen pugna lacrimabilis. iuxta hos ergo uersiculos concupiscentiam possumus accipere magis quam desiderium; ἐπιθυμίαν enim Graecus posuit, concupiscentia autem et desiderium ἐπιθυμία dicitur, sed concupiscentia et de bono et de malo dicitur: concupiuit et defecit anima mea in atria domini pro bono, in lege autem aliter: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret:

daily contests; and so even where a glad conscience shines, the fight is still tearful. According to these verses, then, we can take "concupiscence" rather than "desire"; for the Greek put ἐπιθυμίαν, and both concupiscence and desire are called ἐπιθυμία; but concupiscence is said both of good and of evil: "My soul longs and faints for the courts of the Lord," of good; but in the law otherwise: "For I did not know concupiscence, unless the law said:

37.38.4CSEL 64:166–167

non concupisces, utique pro malo. denique subiecta nos doceant, quia occasione accepta peccatum per mandatum operatur omnem concupiscentiam in hominis affectu. possumus tamen sic accipere: ante te omne desiderium pono, hoc est tibi manifesto quae impetrare desidero, ut ad seriem petitionum, non ad iactantiam referendum uideatur esse uirtutum; iactantia enim insolens etiam in integro, deprecatio etiam in peccatore laudabilis.

you shall not covet," surely of evil. Indeed what follows teaches us that sin, seizing the occasion, through the commandment works every concupiscence in man's affection. Yet we can take it thus: I set all my desire before you, that is, I make plain to you what I desire to obtain, so that it seems to refer to the series of petitions, not to boasting of virtues; for boasting is insolent even in a sound man, entreaty praiseworthy even in a sinner.

Explanation 37, chapter 39

37.39.1CSEL 64:167

Addidit etiam hoc propheta, quia, cum cor suum conturbatum sit, deseruerit se fortitudo sua. magnum periculum, si cor exagitetur, quo credimus ad iustitiam. sed tamen ut in magnis periculis aegritudinum, si dolor sentitur et sensus eius exprimitur, remedium salutis ostenditur — dolere enim tolerabilius est quam non dolere; aliud enim uiuificationis adhuc manentis insigne, si doleas, aliud supremae mortis indicium, si nullus sensus doloris sit —, ita et cor salutis signa demonstrat, quando causas suae perturbationis agnoscit.

The prophet also added this: that, since his heart was troubled, his strength left him. A great danger, if the heart with which we believe unto justice is shaken. But yet, as in great dangers of sickness, if pain is felt and its sense expressed, a remedy of health is shown (for it is more bearable to feel pain than not to feel it; it is one sign of life still remaining if you feel pain, another a sign of final death if there is no sense of pain), so the heart too shows signs of health when it recognizes the causes of its disturbance.

37.39.2CSEL 64:167

denique turbatum est cor Dauid aduersus Nabal hominem pestilentem et gratiam repperit. occurrit Abigaea, quae mitigaret commotionem indignationis et sanctificationem benedictionis acciperet. at uero Nabal duro et rigido corde uerbum uxoris ferre non potuit et obstupefactus obriguit, mortem incidit.

Indeed David's heart was troubled against Nabal, a pestilent man, and found grace. Abigail met him, to soothe the agitation of his indignation, and received the sanctification of blessing. But Nabal, with hard and rigid heart, could not bear his wife's word, and, stupefied, grew stiff and fell into death.

Explanation 37, chapter 40

37.40.1CSEL 64:167

Quae autem prophetam deseruit fortitudo, utrum carnis an mentis? si carnis, non utique desperanda sanitas; nam uirtus in infirmitate perficitur. de quo non mediocriter disputauit arbiter et proeliator quidam luctae mentis et corporis, sciens temperare utriusque certamen, ut restringeret carnem, si cerneret fortiorem, ne in lege peccati captiuam duceret mentem. reuocabat itaque carnem, uirtutem autem mentis iungebat; sic ad coronam meruit peruenire.

And what strength left the prophet, of the flesh or of the mind? If of the flesh, health is surely not to be despaired of; for power is perfected in weakness. Of this one argued not lightly who was a judge and fighter in the wrestling of mind and body, knowing how to temper the contest of both, so as to restrain the flesh if he saw it stronger, lest it lead the mind captive in the law of sin. So he called back the flesh and joined it to the strength of the mind; thus he deserved to reach the crown.

37.40.2CSEL 64:167–168

ergo, quod dicit propheta, si carnis fortitudo deseruit, mentis fortitudo praeualuit. quodsi fortitudinem mentis accipimus deseruisse, non mirum si in grauissimis temptationibus corde turbato putat se homo mentis suae fortitudine deseri. ipse te doceat dicens: fortitudo mea et laudatio mea dominus. dominum ergo quaerebat et ideo, ne deseri

So, as to what the prophet says: if the strength of the flesh left him, the strength of the mind prevailed. But if we take it that the strength of the mind left him, no wonder if in the gravest temptations, with troubled heart, a man thinks he is forsaken by the strength of his mind. Let him teach you himself, saying: "The Lord is my strength and my praise." He was seeking the Lord, then, and so, lest he deserve to be forsaken,

37.40.3CSEL 64:168

mereretur, saepius putabat esse quaerendum et, sicubi fluctuabat, putabat se esse desertum. sic apostoli excitant dormientem, ne obdormiret sibi, non quia eum obdormisse credebant. sic Heliseus, ut superiorum utamur exemplis, ubi est, inquit, deus Heliae?, non quo putaret absentem, sed quia praesentiam eius in beneficiis requirebat. sic Hieremias sequebatur ut medicum dicens: sana me, domine, et sanabor; saluum me fac, et saluabor. non laboraui sequens post te.

he thought he must seek him more often, and, if ever he wavered, thought himself forsaken. So the apostles woke the sleeping one, lest he sleep for himself, not because they believed he had fallen asleep. So Elisha, to use examples from earlier: "Where," he says, "is the God of Elijah?" not because he thought him absent, but because he sought his presence in benefits. So Jeremiah followed him as a physician, saying: "Heal me, Lord, and I shall be healed; save me, and I shall be saved. I have not labored following after you."

37.40.4CSEL 64:168

sic ecclesia requirebat eum in Canticis canticorum et rogabat filias Hierusalem, ut suscitarent dilectionem; quaerebat ut inueniret, quem sua dilectione retinebat nec umquam sentiebat absentem. sic ergo et Dauid non querebatur a Christo se esse desertum, sed iudicabat illo praesente se non posse turbari.

So the church sought him in the Song of Songs and asked the daughters of Jerusalem to rouse love; she sought so as to find him whom she held by her love and never felt absent. So, then, David too did not complain that he was forsaken by Christ, but judged that, with him present, he could not be troubled.

Explanation 37, chapter 41

37.41.1CSEL 64:168

Denique ut scias de Christo magis intellegendum, addidit: et lumen oculorum meorum non est mecum. quod est uerum lumen omnium nisi Christus, de quo Iohannes dicit: erat uerum lumen quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, quia ipse est qui inluminat et corporis oculos et mentis obtutum? rogemus ergo, ut semper nobis suum lumen infundat et semper nobiscum sit, sicut erat cum Dauid. et ideo audebat dicere: quoniam apud

Indeed, so that you may know it is rather to be understood of Christ, he added: "And the light of my eyes is not with me." What is the true light of all but Christ, of whom John says: "He was the true light which enlightens every man coming into this world," since he it is who enlightens both the eyes of the body and the sight of the mind? Let us ask, then, that he always pour his light into us and always be with us, as he was with David. And so he dared to say: "For with

37.41.2CSEL 64:168–169

te fons uitae et in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen. ille certe quasi propheta magnum uiderat lumen; nobis lucerna eius luceat, ne possimus errare, et lucerna uerbum est, sicut uerum lumen est uerbum quod totum inluminat mundum. denique lucerna pedibus meis uerbum tuum, domine, et lucernam illam etiam propheta quaerebat, non lanternam, sed lucernam. lucernam Iohannes inuenit et demonstrauit, cum lanterna, persecutor aduenit et demonstrauit; lanterna enim clausum habet, non liberum lumen.

you is the fountain of life, and in your light we shall see light." He certainly, as a prophet, had seen a great light; for us let his lamp shine, so that we cannot go astray; and the lamp is the word, as the true light is the Word who enlightens the whole world. Indeed: "Your word, Lord, is a lamp to my feet"; and the prophet sought that lamp, not a lantern, but a lamp. John found the lamp and pointed it out; with a lantern the persecutor came and pointed him out; for a lantern has a closed, not a free, light.

37.41.3CSEL 64:169

lumen Iudaeorum quasi lucerna sub modio uel faces sub uelamine; potest uideri, sed non uidetur. nos autem reuelata facie gloriam domini speculamur aeternam, ut ad eius imaginem a gloria in gloriam per spiritum sanctum reformemur. uenit ergo persecutorum turba cum lanternis et ideo inclusam lucem uidere eorum oculi nequiuerunt; uenit cum facibus, quae plus habent in fumo caliginis quam splendoris in lumine.

The light of the Jews is like a lamp under a bushel or torches under a veil; it can be seen, but is not seen. But we, with unveiled face, behold the eternal glory of the Lord, so as to be re-formed into his image from glory to glory through the Holy Spirit. So the crowd of persecutors came with lanterns, and so their eyes could not see the enclosed light; it came with torches, which have more gloom in their smoke than splendor in their light.

37.41.4CSEL 64:169

denique facibus mortuorum cadauera ardere consuerunt. sibi ergo Iudaei iam ferebant incendia, qui persequebantur salutis auctorem. uenere cum armis, significantes armis se perituros esse a Romanis usque ad excidium totius ciuitatis et templi, qui pacem domini recusarunt.

Indeed corpses of the dead are usually burned with torches. So the Jews were already carrying burnings for themselves, who persecuted the author of salvation. They came with weapons, signifying that by weapons they would perish at the hands of the Romans, to the destruction of the whole city and temple, they who refused the Lord's peace.

Explanation 37, chapter 42

37.42.1CSEL 64:169

Amici mei et proximi mei aduersum me appropinquauerunt et steterunt et proximi mei a longe steterunt; et uim faciebant qui quaerebant animam meam et qui inquirebant mala mea locuti sunt uanitatem et dolum tota die meditabantur. ego autem uel surdus non audiebam et sicut mutus qui non aperit os suum, et factus sum sicut homo non audiens et non habens in ore suo increpationes.

"My friends and my neighbors drew near against me and stood, and my neighbors stood far off; and those who sought my soul used violence, and those who sought my evils spoke vanity and meditated deceit all day long. But I, like one deaf, did not hear, and like a dumb man who does not open his mouth; and I became like a man who does not hear and has no rebukes in his mouth."

37.42.2CSEL 64:169–170

uidero qui sint, qui argute ista discutiant. mihi in primo praecipue isto uersiculo domini uidetur tenenda sententia, quia in temptationibus inimici fiunt hominis etiam domestici eius. hoc ergo sanctus Dauid pure atque sincere et dolenter fatetur. uerus enim dolor est et interioris cordis confessio, quando enumerantur omnia quibus secreta mentis uiscera amarissimo conpunguntur affectu et domestico felle exacerbantur.

I shall see who they are who discuss these things subtly. To me, especially in this first verse, the Lord's saying seems to be kept, that in temptations a man's enemies are even those of his household. This, then, holy David confesses purely and sincerely and with grief. For true grief and confession of the inner heart is when all those things are enumerated by which the secret inner parts of the mind are pricked with most bitter feeling and embittered by domestic gall.

37.42.3CSEL 64:170

deplorat igitur propheta ab amicis se et proximis inpugnatum, a quibus utique non inpugnari debuit, sed iuuari. quod utique cum sancti Iob querimonia concurrit, quia et ipse arguebat tres illos reges consolatores malorum, qui maiora ei inferebant certamina, cum ad consolandum eum amicitiae gratia conuenissent; quod utique cauendum est nobis. consolatio enim mitis debet esse, non

So the prophet laments that he was attacked by friends and neighbors, by whom he surely ought not to have been attacked but helped. This agrees with holy Job's complaint, for he too reproached those three kings as comforters of evils, who brought him greater contests when they had come together, by the grace of friendship, to comfort him; and this we must beware of. For consolation should be gentle, not

37.42.4CSEL 64:170

aspera, quae magis dolorem leniat, feruorem mitiget quam commotionem excitet. certe ipsius corporis medicina nos doceat, quae feruentibus uulneribus molliora medicamenta consueuit adhibere, quibus dolorem alleuet. ideoque fouentur primo uulnera, post secantur, ne offendat ipsa durities et incisio uulnus exasperet. quanto igitur magis cauere nos conuenit, ut, cum uenerimus ad consolandum, non facile, non perfunctorie loquamur! septem diebus tacuit Iob,

harsh, so as rather to soothe pain and calm fever than stir up agitation. Certainly the medicine of the body itself may teach us, which is accustomed to apply milder remedies to inflamed wounds, by which to relieve pain. And so wounds are first fomented, afterwards cut, lest the hardness itself offend and the incision inflame the wound. How much more, then, ought we to take care, when we have come to console, not to speak easily or carelessly! Job was silent for seven days;

37.42.5CSEL 64:170

tacuerunt amici nec locuti essent, nisi Iob dolore prorupisset in uocem. quaerendum est enim unde incipias, ne in ipso sermone offendat consolatio tua; etiam taciturnitas ipsa medicina est et uelox in sermonibus magis uulnerat. quid miraris si alterum uulnerat, cum frequenter ipse uulneretur, quia ex multiloquio peccatum non fugit? etenim si medicus medendi tempus expectat, ut digestis aegritudinibus medicinae subsidia deferantur, ne acerba adhuc et inmatura, ut asserunt, aegritudo curationis remediis reluctetur et beneficium sentire non possit, quanto magis explorare nos con-

his friends were silent, and they would not have spoken had not Job in his pain burst into speech. For you must seek where to begin, lest in the very speech your consolation offend; even silence itself is medicine, and one quick in words rather wounds. Why do you wonder if he wounds another, when he himself is often wounded, since in much speaking he does not escape sin? For if a physician waits for the time of healing, so that the aids of medicine may be applied when the sicknesses have been digested, lest the sickness, still harsh and unripe, as they assert, resist the remedies of cure and be unable to feel the benefit, how much more ought we to

37.42.6CSEL 64:170–171

uenit, ut oportune a nobis medicabilis sermo procedat, qui non accendere luctum, sed lenire uideatur! uis urget doloris, premitur cor mulieris afflictae, quae inmaturo obitu maritum amisit aut filios: quid properas, cum te illa non audiat, nisi deferuescat dolor? saepe lites de consolationibus uidimus excitatas. uenisti ut doleas, non ut litiges. ordo sermonis ipse quaerendus est, ne peccatum apud deum incurras, dum desideras hominem consolari, ne dicenti tibi: audi haec et alia multa quae nihil prosint, [et] respondeat: audite, consolatores malorum, ne in luctu alterius certamen garrulae disputationis inducas, ne non accedas, cum oporteat, ne accedas et durior sit tuus sermo. denique quid dicatur de talibus, doceat te sanctus Iob: simul mihi uenerunt temptationes grauissimae, circumdederunt me considerantes. fratres mei discesserunt a me, cognouerunt extraneos magis quam me; amici mei inmisericordes facti sunt. hic ergo naturalis est sensus etiam sancti prophetae Dauid: queritur se ab amicis inpugnatum, a proximis destitutum.

examine, so that a healing word may come from us opportunely, which seems not to kindle grief but to soothe it! The force of grief presses, the heart of an afflicted woman is crushed, who has lost her husband or children by untimely death: why do you hurry, when she does not hear you until the grief cools? We have often seen quarrels stirred up over consolations. You came to grieve, not to quarrel. The order of speech must be sought, lest you incur sin before God while you wish to console a man; lest, when you say: "Hear these and many other things," which are of no profit, she answer: "Hear, comforters of evils"; lest you bring into another's mourning the contest of a chattering dispute; lest you not come when you ought, or come and your speech be too harsh. Indeed let holy Job teach you what is said of such men: "At once the gravest temptations came upon me, they surrounded me, watching. My brothers departed from me, they acknowledged strangers rather than me; my friends became merciless." This, then, is the natural sense of holy David the prophet too: he complains that he was attacked by friends, abandoned by neighbors.

Explanation 37, chapter 43

37.43.1CSEL 64:171

Sed ne mysticus quidem abhorreat pietatis affectus, ut pro angelis dixerit qui praetendunt timentibus dominum, ut eripiant eos de temptationibus quas ferre non possunt. quomodo ergo longe stant qui ad adiumentum sunt attributi? sed non illi se separant, sed qui urgetur temptationibus putat eos longe abesse, quos propius sibi adesse desiderat, et arbitratur dissimulare, cum illi iuuandi tempus nutu sui imperatoris expectent, qui athletam suum, quo gloriosius uinceret, diutius certare praecepit.

But not even a mystical feeling of piety should be shunned, so that he may have spoken of the angels, who are set before those who fear the Lord, to rescue them from temptations they cannot bear. How, then, do they stand far off who are assigned to help? But they do not separate themselves; rather he who is pressed by temptations thinks they are far off, whom he desires to be nearer to him, and thinks they hold back, while they await the time for helping at the nod of their commander, who has ordered his athlete to contend longer so as to win more gloriously.

37.43.2CSEL 64:171–172

et uidetur hoc magis sequentibus conuenire, quia angelis protectionis excubias relaxantibus insidiabantur inimici, quaerentes in anima eius inuenire quod noceat. tunc enim potestas illis grauioris temptationis permittitur, cum culpa animae grauior repperitur. unde habes illud in libro Regnorum regis Achab ad Heliam dictum, quando eum propheta uehementer increpauit et mortem ei denuntiauit:

And this seems to fit better with what follows, because, when the angels relaxed the watches of protection, the enemies lay in wait, seeking to find in his soul something to harm. For power of graver temptation is permitted them when graver guilt of soul is found. Hence you have in the book of Kingdoms that saying of King Ahab to Elijah, when the prophet rebuked him vehemently and announced his death to him:

37.43.3CSEL 64:172

inuenisti, inquit, me? et respondit Helias: inueni, quia fecisti malignum in conspectu domini. uides ergo, quia regibus non temere uel a prophetis dei uel a sacerdotibus facienda iniuria sit, si nulla sint grauiora peccata in quibus debeant argui. ubi autem peccata grauiora sunt, ibi non uidetur a sacerdote parcendum, ut iustis increpationibus corrigantur

"Have you found me?" he says; and Elijah answered: "I have found you, because you have done evil in the sight of the Lord." You see, then, that kings must not be rashly wronged by God's prophets or priests, if there are no graver sins for which they should be rebuked. But where sins are graver, there it seems the priest should not spare, so that they may be corrected by just rebukes.

Explanation 37, chapter 44

37.44.1CSEL 64:172

Tamen Dauid in hoc loco dicit quod nihil inuenisse uideantur, et ideo inimici eius uanitatem locuti sunt, quoniam nihil quod pro ueritate loquerentur inuenerint. aut certe quia, etsi peccaui, tamen peccata mea paenitendi dolore purgabam; in quo illi cum dolo mecum loquebantur, ut obiurgatione confunderent et a conuersione reuocarent. et uide ne hoc magis senserit, quaesisse illos mala eius, sed, cum uellent accusare, praeuentos, quod uulnera sua ipse patefecerit sui accusator existens, et ideo uim accusationis eorum esse tenuatam, locutos autem ueri uana, quae confesso culpam iam nocere non possent.

Yet David in this place says that they seem to have found nothing, and so his enemies spoke vanity, since they found nothing to speak for the truth. Or at least: although I sinned, yet I was purging my sins with the grief of repentance; in which they spoke with me with deceit, to confound me with reproach and call me back from conversion. And see whether he did not rather mean this: that they sought his evils, but, when they wished to accuse, were forestalled, because he himself laid open his wounds, being his own accuser, and so the force of their accusation was weakened, and they spoke vain things of the truth, which could not harm one who had already confessed his guilt.

Explanation 37, chapter 45

37.45.1CSEL 64:172–173

Exclusi igitur a criminationis inuidia dolum adhibebant, ut insurgerent, inquit, mihi et insultarent, quo me stimularent ad aliquam commotionem; quorum ego dolum uidens uelut surdus non audiebam. considera uim sermonis. non dixit quia simulabam non me audire quae dicerent, sed non audiebam dixit et quod intentione mentis uocem loquentis excluderet nec aperiret os suum sicut mutus.

Shut out, then, from the odium of accusation, they used deceit, "to rise up," he says, "against me and insult me," so as to goad me to some agitation; seeing their deceit, I, like one deaf, did not hear. Consider the force of the word. He did not say: I pretended not to hear what they said; but he said "I did not hear," and that by the attention of his mind he shut out the voice of the speaker and did not open his mouth, like a dumb man.

37.45.2CSEL 64:173

beatus qui potest tantam habere uirtutem, ut lacessitus non irascatur, commotus se nolit ulcisci. inimici hoc agunt, ut prouocent ad iracundiam, maledicunt, ut maledicamus, criminantur, ut crimen retorqueamus, conuiciantur, ut excitent nos ad uicissitudinem contumeliae. unde praeclare Petrus de domino Iesu in epistula sua posuit, quia cum malediceretur non maledicebat, cum pateretur non comminabatur.

Blessed is he who can have such virtue that, provoked, he is not angry, stirred, he does not want to avenge himself. Enemies do this to provoke to anger: they curse that we may curse, accuse that we may turn the accusation back, revile to rouse us to return the insult. Hence Peter excellently put in his epistle of the Lord Jesus, that when he was cursed he did not curse, when he suffered he did not threaten.

37.45.3CSEL 64:173

ad eius similitudinem atque imaginem iustus suae uitae cupiens instituta formare accusatus tacet, laesus remittit, dissimulat lacessitus et non aperit os suum, ut illum imitetur, qui sicut agnus ad uictimam ductus est et non aperit os suum et, cum posset habere quod referat, magis uult silere quam dicere.

To his likeness and image the just man, desiring to form the ordering of his life, when accused is silent, when hurt forgives, when provoked lets it pass, and does not open his mouth, so as to imitate him who was led like a lamb to the sacrifice and does not open his mouth, and, though he could have something to reply, prefers to be silent rather than speak.

37.45.4CSEL 64:173

ipse enim dominus Iesus uere cum accusaretur tacebat et cum percuteretur non repercutiebat. denique percussus respondit: si male locutus sum, testimonium perhibe de malo; si bene, quid me caedis? uide quemadmodum quasi uere infirmus et quasi is, qui se uindicare non posset, puerili quodam loquebatur affectu. ita ergo et tu, si habeas quo redarguas arguentem, melius tacebis, ne redarguendi uicissitudine commotionem tuam prodas; melius est enim dissimulare iniuriam quam, cum redarguis, uindicare.

For the Lord Jesus himself was truly silent when he was accused, and when he was struck did not strike back. Indeed, when struck, he answered: "If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; if well, why do you strike me?" See how, as if truly weak and as one who could not avenge himself, he spoke with a kind of childlike feeling. So you too, if you have the means to refute your accuser, will do better to be silent, lest by refuting in turn you betray your agitation; for it is better to overlook an injury than to avenge it by refuting.

37.45.5CSEL 64:173–174

bonus mutus qui loqui male nescit, cuius ex ore crimen exire non nouit. hic est mutus uere beatus, qui cum tacet intra se loquitur: dominus dat mihi linguam eruditionis, quando oporteat me dicere sermonem. talia loquebatur intra se Zacharias, cum ommutuisset, et uere, quia loqui ei non profuerat, ne loqueretur ommutuit et ut loqueretur exauditus a Christo est. denique scripsit quod Christus exaudiret et uocem recepit quam

Good is the dumb man who does not know how to speak evil, from whose mouth crime does not know how to go out. This is the truly blessed dumb man, who, when silent, speaks within himself: "The Lord gives me a tongue of instruction, when I should speak a word." Such things Zechariah spoke within himself when he had become dumb; and truly, because speaking had not profited him, he became dumb so as not to speak, and was heard by Christ so as to speak. Indeed he wrote what Christ would hear, and received the voice which

37.45.6CSEL 64:174

Christus indulsit et gratiam adiunxit quam ante non habuit, ut prophetaret eum cuius mandatis ante non credidit. quid de domino omnium uirtutum loquor, cum mulier Susanna nec sexus infirmitate turbata, quibus se ad periculum mortis cognouit addictam, uocem emiserit? accusabatur et tacebat, ducebatur ad mortem et silentio se tegebat, ne nudaret pudorem. intra se tamen loquebatur deo, qui eam magis audiuit tacentem, quae si uoluisset loqui forsitan non esset audita.

Christ granted, and added a grace he had not had before, so as to prophesy of him whose commands he had not believed before. Why speak of the Lord of all virtues, when the woman Susanna, not troubled even by the weakness of her sex, uttered no word to those by whom she knew herself handed over to the danger of death? She was accused and was silent, she was led to death and covered herself with silence, lest she bare her modesty. Yet within herself she spoke to God, who heard her the more when silent, who, had she wished to speak, perhaps would not have been heard.

Explanation 37, chapter 46

37.46.1CSEL 64:174

Et tu ergo, qui proposuisti satisfacere pro delictis domino deo tuo, illi soli interiore corde te purga, illum contuere qui potest peccata diluere. adiuuat te qui putauerit arguendum. denique cum malediceretur Dauid et eius dux Abessa eius iniuriam uellet ulcisci, dixit ad eum Dauid: dimitte illum, ut maledicat, quoniam dixit illi dominus, ut uideatis humilitatem meam et retribuat mihi dominus bona pro maledicto hoc. uides igitur, quod a conuiciantibus adiuueris, ut dominus audiat te et peccatum tuum remittat.

You too, then, who have resolved to make satisfaction for your offenses to the Lord your God, purify yourself to him alone with your inner heart; look to him who can wash away sins. He helps you who thinks you should be reproved. Indeed, when David was being cursed and his captain Abishai wished to avenge his injury, David said to him: "Let him alone, that he may curse, for the Lord has told him, that you may see my humiliation, and the Lord may repay me good for this cursing." You see, then, that you are helped by those who revile you, so that the Lord may hear you and remit your sin.

37.46.2CSEL 64:174

nam cum ipse accusator tuus esse debeas et coacerbare flagitia teque ipsum offerre supplicio, quomodo negare obiecta desideras? paenitentia patientiam quaerit, patientia mitigat delicta magna. quomodo irasceris aliis tuae ipse reus conscientiae? quomodo commoueris, cum debeas esse miserabilis? qui arguitur et, quod est amplius, a semet ipso, curare debet sua uulnera, non alterum uulnerare. nemo alium uulnerando se sanat. medice, cura te ipsum. si medicus, quanto magis reus prius curare se debet!

For since you ought to be your own accuser and heap up your shameful deeds and offer yourself to punishment, how do you desire to deny what is charged? Repentance seeks patience; patience soothes great offenses. How are you angry with others, yourself guilty in your conscience? How are you stirred, when you ought to be pitiable? He who is reproved, and what is more by himself, must cure his own wounds, not wound another. No one heals himself by wounding another. "Physician, heal yourself." If a physician, how much more must a defendant cure himself first!

37.46.3CSEL 64:174–175

confiteris peccatum tuum et medicum profiteris alienum: etsi ueritatis est quod retorques, temporis non est; peccatori enim dixit deus: quare tu enarras iustitias meas? usurpasti tibi ut de lege arguas, qui contra legem ipse stetisti. quid lacrimarum tempus amittis? quid concertando uanos sermones aut audis aut loqueris, cum tibi scriptum sit: non accipias auditum uanum, cum legeris in euangelio pro omni sermone otioso iudicium esse subeundum? etsi alius loquitur, tace, etsi alius conuiciatur, aurem tuam obstrue.

You confess your sin, and profess yourself another's physician: even if what you retort belongs to truth, it does not belong to the time; for God said to the sinner: "Why do you recount my justices?" You have usurped the right to reprove from the law, you who have stood against the law. Why do you lose the time for tears? Why, by contending, do you either hear or speak vain words, when it is written for you: "Do not receive a vain report," when you have read in the gospel that judgment must be undergone for every idle word? Even if another speaks, be silent; even if another reviles, stop your ear.

Explanation 37, chapter 47

37.47.1CSEL 64:175

Dauid tacendo uicit aduersarios suos et, quia sicut mutus factus est, uocem recepit, quia conuersus ad dominum loquebatur dicens: quoniam in te, domine, speraui; tu exaudies me, domine deus meus. quia dixi: ne aliquando exultent in me inimici mei. uide singula. tacebat Dauid, loquebantur inimici, prouocabant ut aliquid et ipse loqueretur.

David overcame his adversaries by keeping silent, and, because he became like a dumb man, he received his voice, for, turned to the Lord, he spoke, saying: "For in you, Lord, have I hoped; you will hear me, O Lord my God. For I said: lest at any time my enemies rejoice over me." See each point. David was silent, the enemies spoke, they provoked him so that he too might say something.

37.47.2CSEL 64:175

dicebant: audiamus uocem tuam, intra se ille tacitus loquebatur. quid opus est ut ista audiant quibus prodesse non possunt? in te, domine, speraui, tibi soli loquor, tu audi qui exaudire potes. a te semper poposci, ne aliquando exultent in me inimici mei, quia, etsi peccaui, tu peccatum dimittis, etsi ego cecidi, tu resuscitas, ne habeant unde exultare possint qui peccatis laetantur alienis.

They said: let us hear your voice; he, silent, spoke within himself. What need is there for these to hear what cannot profit them? In you, Lord, I have hoped, to you alone I speak; you hear, who can hear. I have always asked of you that my enemies may never rejoice over me, because, even if I sinned, you forgive sin; even if I fell, you raise up; so that those who rejoice in others' sins may have nothing to exult over.

37.47.3CSEL 64:175–176

plus enim adquisiuimus qui plus peccauimus, quia beatiores facit tua gratia quam nostra innocentia. habemus hunc sensum et in libro Michaeae prophetae: noli gaudere super me inimica mea, quia cecidi, sed resurgam. non est grauis infirmitatis ruina, si non sit etiam uoluntatis studium ab ea non surgendi. habe uoluntatem surgendi: praesens est qui faciat ut resurgas.

For we who have sinned more have gained more, because your grace makes us more blessed than our innocence. We have this sense in the book of the prophet Micah too: "Do not rejoice over me, my enemy, because I have fallen; but I shall rise." The fall of weakness is not grave, if there is not also a will's desire not to rise from it. Have the will to rise: he is present who will make you rise again.

Explanation 37, chapter 48

37.48.1CSEL 64:176

Dixit ergo Dauid in corde suo, petens ut exaudiretur a domino et ut non exultarent in eum eius inimici, petens etiam ut in conuersionis suae proposito permaneret, ne, dum propositi sui gressus quasi quidam pedes suae animae commouentur, in eum aduersarii superba et magniloquentiae plena loquerentur, ut faciunt qui insultare desiderant.

David spoke, then, in his heart, asking to be heard by the Lord and that his enemies should not exult over him, asking too that he might persevere in the purpose of his conversion, lest, while the steps of his purpose, like certain feet of his soul, were shaken, his adversaries should speak proud things full of boasting against him, as those do who desire to insult.

37.48.2CSEL 64:176

tamen, etsi moueatur ut homo, paratum ad flagella se dicit, ut uel supplicio soluat errorem. etsi cessent flagella domini, se tamen dolore proprio memorat flagellari, ut non inueniat culpa quod damnet, quam bona confessio praeuenerit. hoc est ergo quod ait: et dum commouentur pedes mei, in me magna locuti sunt, eo quod tam prompti sunt ad insultationis ludibria, ut in commotione pedum meorum paratam habuerint magniloquentiam. uel certe sic: dum commouentur pedes mei, putantes quod caderem, superba iam et magniloqua sunt locuti.

Yet, even if he is shaken as a man, he says he is ready for scourges, so as to pay for his error even by punishment. Even if the Lord's scourges cease, he recalls that he is scourged by his own grief, so that guilt, which good confession has forestalled, may find nothing to condemn. This, then, is what he says: "And while my feet were moved, they spoke great things against me," because they are so ready for the mockeries of insult that in the moving of my feet they had boasting ready. Or certainly thus: while my feet were moved, thinking I would fall, they already spoke proud and boastful things.

Explanation 37, chapter 49

37.49.1CSEL 64:176

Sed tamen quia ipse in posterioribus paene motos pedes suos dixit, ne quid oriatur hinc scrupuli, considera hic doceri nos affectum paenitentiae, ibi opinionem eius erroris excludi, quod diuitiae et successus prosperior flagitiosorum nos mouere non debeant.

But yet, because in a later psalm he himself said his feet were almost moved, lest any scruple arise from this, consider that here we are taught the feeling of penance, there the opinion of that error is excluded, that the riches and more prosperous success of the shameless should not move us.

37.49.2CSEL 64:176

consuetudo autem elocutionis in scripturis diuinis huiusmodi repperitur. sic enim et alibi: dum conuerteret dominus captiuitatem Sion, facti sumus sicut consolati, quamquam sanctus non in ostensione uerborum, sed in uirtute spiritus probari se uelit. sensus ergo nobis spectandus est semper, quem etiam ipsum frequens translatio ex Hebraeo in Graecum, ex Graeco in Latinum attenuare consueuit.

And a usage of expression of this kind is found in the divine Scriptures. For so elsewhere: "When the Lord turned back the captivity of Zion, we became like those comforted," although the saint wishes to be proved not in a display of words but in the power of the Spirit. The sense, then, must always be looked to, which frequent translation from Hebrew into Greek and from Greek into Latin usually weakens.

Explanation 37, chapter 50

37.50.1CSEL 64:176–177

Ad omnia itaque superiora pulchrum remedium, quod in flagella paratus est et offert se domino, ut quae placuerint deo flagella sustineat. elegisse quidem lego sanctum Dauid flagelli genus quod aequanimiter sustineret, sed elegit, quia de tribus ei condicionibus eligendae unius necessitas mandabatur.

For all the foregoing, then, there is a fine remedy: that he is ready for scourges and offers himself to the Lord, to bear whatever scourges please God. I read indeed that holy David chose a kind of scourge he could bear with equanimity; but he chose because the necessity of choosing one of three conditions was laid on him.

37.50.2CSEL 64:177

ubi autem non mandatur, ad omnia paratus est dei seruulus, seu corporalem aegritudinem subeat seu fugam a facie inimici siue obitum filiorum, quos non timet praemittere, quia recipere potest inperterritus. nam est sciens, quod, si hic fuerit punitus supplicio temporali, leuare in futurum perpetuae possit poenam aerumnae. rogat ergo, ut recipiatur petitio sua et castigetur ipse, ut recipiatur; castigat enim dominus omnem filium quem recipit.

But where it is not commanded, God's servant is ready for everything, whether he undergo bodily sickness or flight from the face of the enemy or the death of his children, whom he does not fear to send ahead, because he can receive them back undaunted. For he knows that, if he is punished here with temporal punishment, he can lighten the penalty of perpetual misery in the future. He asks, then, that his petition be received and that he himself be chastised so as to be received; "for the Lord chastises every son whom he receives."

Explanation 37, chapter 51

37.51.1CSEL 64:177

Si seruulum tuum uideas peccata propria confitentem ultro offerre se poenae, inflecteris, ignoscis: et de domini miseratione diffidis? iudex ipse, cui non licet in plurimis causis a gladio temperare, quia legibus seruit, potest tamen lucrum donare poenarum, et tu adhuc trepidas, quid a legum domino et misericordiae auctore deposcas, cui lex uoluntas est et donandi ius, si tamen tu petas tibi tua peccata donari nec consideres honores tuos aut erubescas amicos tuos, ne dignitatem tuam flexisse uidearis?

If you see your slave confessing his own sins and offering himself of his own accord to punishment, you are moved, you forgive: and do you distrust the Lord's compassion? A judge himself, who in many cases may not hold back the sword because he serves the laws, can yet grant remission of penalties; and do you still tremble about what to ask of the Lord of the laws and author of mercy, whose will is law and who has the right to give, if only you ask that your sins be forgiven you, and do not consider your honors or blush before your friends, lest you seem to have bent your dignity?

37.51.2CSEL 64:177

amicus dei, propheta dei, rex ab ipso electus deo et unctus in regnum flagellis se spontaneus offerebat nec erubescebat, et tu erubescis? non ista uerecundia multum tibi opitulabitur, cum ad iudicium dei ueneris, sed pudoris te istius paenitebit, cum in conspectu non solum hominum, sed etiam angelorum et omnium potestatum caelestium constitutus coeperis peccata propria non negare. quomodo excusabis, cum tanta commiseris? praetendes condicionis infirmitatem, quia nemo sine peccato.

A friend of God, a prophet of God, a king chosen by God himself and anointed to the kingdom, offered himself willingly to scourges and did not blush, and do you blush? That shame will not help you much when you come to God's judgment; but you will repent of that shame when, set in the sight not only of men but of angels and all the heavenly powers, you begin not to deny your own sins. How will you excuse yourself, when you have committed so much? You will plead the weakness of your condition, because no one is without sin.

37.51.3CSEL 64:177–178

respondebitur tibi: debuisti ergo agere paenitentiam; dederam remedium, cur refutasti? subtexes pudorem, quod honores tuos erubueris. dicet: si tu erubuisti me coram amicis tuis, et ego te erubescam coram patre meo qui est in caelis. disce uerum esse quod scriptum est, quia est uerecundia adducens peccatum. Dauid in conspectu suo dolorem suum ponebat, ne umquam obliuisceretur; Dauid iniquitatem suam ipse pronuntiabat; Dauid de peccato suo, non de opibus cogitabat; Dauid non erubescebat sua recensere peccata, ne de his erubesceret in meo iudicio constitutus:

It will be answered you: then you ought to have done penance; I had given a remedy, why did you refuse it? You will add shame, that you blushed for your honors. He will say: "If you were ashamed of me before your friends, I too will be ashamed of you before my Father who is in heaven." Learn that what is written is true, that "there is a shame that brings sin." David set his grief before his eyes, lest he ever forget it; David himself pronounced his iniquity; David thought about his sin, not his wealth; David did not blush to review his sins, lest he blush for them when set in my judgment:

37.51.4CSEL 64:178

et tu erubescebis? non esset hodie in requie seruulus meus Iob, si erubuisset tres illos reges amicos suos, non ipse Dauid, si erubuisset delicta propria confiteri. ergo quia non erubuit mihi sua aperire peccata, nec ego erubescam ei mea secreta reserare. et quia uterque eorum non erubuit factorum suorum pretium in mea ponere potestate, meo se iudicio uoluntatique committere, nec ego de talibus

and will you blush? My servant Job would not today be at rest if he had been ashamed before those three kings his friends; nor David himself, if he had been ashamed to confess his own offenses. So, because he was not ashamed to open his sins to me, neither will I be ashamed to unlock my secrets to him. And because neither of them was ashamed to place the price of his deeds in my power and to commit himself to my judgment and will, neither shall I be ashamed of such

37.51.5CSEL 64:178

seruulis erubescam, ut appellem amicos qui meam studuerint facere uoluntatem. ideoque quoniam illi ante in maerore, nunc in consolatione; tu quia in deliciis, nunc in suppliciis. chaos inter uos magnum est, ut neque illorum ad te gratia nec tua ad illos possit poena transire. audis ergo quid dicat Dauid? audi, dum tibi corrigere et emendare permittitur; si hic emendaueris, illic requiesces. non te dulcia mundi et saeculi huius amoena delectent; graue fel uomere consuerunt. non ille iocunda quaerebat positus in regno, qui eligebat mortem sanctorum quam uitam flagitiosorum.

servants, so as to call them friends who strove to do my will. And so, since they were formerly in grief, now in consolation; you, because you were in delights, now in torments. There is a great chasm between you, so that neither their grace can pass to you nor your punishment to them. Do you hear, then, what David says? Hear, while you are permitted to correct and amend; if you amend here, you will rest there. Let not the sweet things of the world and the pleasures of this age delight you; they usually vomit heavy gall. He did not seek pleasant things, though set in a kingdom, who chose the death of the saints rather than the life of the shameless.

Explanation 37, chapter 52

37.52.1CSEL 64:178

Inimici, inquit, mei uiuunt et confirmati sunt super me et multiplicati sunt qui oderunt me inique; qui retribuunt mala pro bonis detrahebant mihi, quoniam subsecutus sum iustitiam. sed quanto ille inlustrior qui cotidie moriebatur, ut populum

"My enemies," he says, "live and are strengthened against me, and those who hate me wrongfully are multiplied; those who repay evil for good slandered me, because I followed after justice." But how much more illustrious he who died daily, to give life to his people,

37.52.2CSEL 64:178–179

suum uiuificaret, et corpus suum mortis uulneribus offerebat, sicut ipse ait: in mortibus frequenter! mors enim honesta redemptio uitae est etiam decoloris aut innoxiae firmamentum, exitus autem mortis in manu uitae; et ideo malebat apostolus cotidie mori, ut uitae suae meritum comprobaret; scriptum est enim: non laudes hominem in uita sua. qui enim uiuunt moriuntur, qui moriuntur resurgent. propior ergo saluti est, qui moritur ut resurgat, quam ille, qui uiuit ut moriatur.

and offered his body to the wounds of death, as he himself says: "in deaths often"! For an honorable death is the redemption even of a discolored life, or the confirmation of an innocent one, and the outcome of death is in the hand of life; and so the apostle preferred to die daily, to prove the merit of his life; for it is written: "Do not praise a man in his life." For those who live die; those who die will rise. He is nearer to salvation, then, who dies to rise again than he who lives to die.

37.52.3CSEL 64:179

quis est autem qui cotidie moriatur nisi qui mortem domini Iesu in sua carne circumfert, ut omnia ei peccata moriantur? confirmati autem et multiplicati sunt inimici Dauid in hoc saeculo; sed non idoneum firmamentum nisi eius, qui confirmatur in Christo. denique illi confirmantur in saeculo, qui oderunt iustum inique; non ergo iustum odium, sed iniustum, cum odissent inique.

And who is it that dies daily but he who carries about the death of the Lord Jesus in his flesh, so that all sins may die to him? David's enemies were strengthened and multiplied in this world; but no strengthening is sound except his who is strengthened in Christ. In short, those are strengthened in the world who hate the just man wrongfully; not, then, a just hatred but an unjust, since they hated wrongfully.

Explanation 37, chapter 53

37.53.1CSEL 64:179

Sed uide distantiam. in posterioribus ait: qui oderunt me gratis, hic habet: qui oderunt me inique. sed ibi ex persona Christi, hic ex persona sua; ubi ex persona Christi loquitur, gratis odio habetur, ubi ex sua, inique. homo enim potest uni alicui uulneri non patere — ut puta iniustitiae intemperantiae inpudicitiae —, aliis autem uulneribus patet; in Christo autem nulla causa esse potuit, qua peccati alicuius potuerit uulnus accipere inmunis a culpa et integer a delicto atque inmaculatus a uitio. sunt autem qui putant utrumque psalmum ex persona Christi esse decursum, qui pro nostris peccatis satisfiebat patri. hic ergo dicebat se appetitum contra iustitiam, illic contra gratiam.

But see the difference. In a later psalm he says: "those who hated me without cause"; here he has: "those who hated me wrongfully." But there he speaks in the person of Christ, here in his own; where he speaks in Christ's person, he is hated without cause; where in his own, wrongfully. For a man can be closed to some one wound (for example, injustice, intemperance, impurity) but open to other wounds; but in Christ there could be no cause by which he could receive the wound of any sin, immune from guilt, whole from offense and spotless from vice. Some, however, think both psalms were run through in the person of Christ, who was making satisfaction to the Father for our sins. Here, then, he said he was attacked against justice, there against grace.

Explanation 37, chapter 54

37.54.1CSEL 64:179–180

Et bene addit, ut probaret se iniuste appetitum: quoniam subsecutus sum iustitiam. quanta uis uerbi in huius syllabae adiectione, ut subsecutum se diceret iustitiam, non secutum! propior est enim qui subsequitur quam ille qui sequitur et subpar quam inpar et successio heredis magis quam accessio nuncupatur.

And well he adds, to prove that he was attacked unjustly: "because I followed after justice." What force of the word by the addition of this syllable, so that he said he "followed after" justice, not "followed"! For he who follows after is nearer than he who follows, and "nearly equal" than "unequal," and the succession of an heir is so called rather than an accession.

Explanation 37, chapter 55

37.55.1CSEL 64:180

Et tamen, quamuis subsequatur iustitiam, non suae uirtutis putat esse, sed gratiae caelestis, si non deseratur a Christo, eoque orat inpensius dicens: ne derelinquas me, domine; deus meus, ne discesseris a me, hoc est: homines me dereliquerunt, amici mei inpugnarunt dilectum sibi, proximi non appropinquauerunt. fugiebant me quasi mortuum et abominati sunt, quia peccata mea desideraui tibi confiteri, quia flagellis tuis

And yet, although he follows after justice, he thinks it belongs not to his own virtue but to heavenly grace, if he is not forsaken by Christ, and so he prays more earnestly, saying: "Do not forsake me, O Lord; my God, do not depart from me"; that is: men have forsaken me, my friends have attacked one dear to them, my neighbors have not come near. They fled me as one dead and abhorred me, because I desired to confess my sins to you, because to your scourges

37.55.2CSEL 64:180

me optuli uulnerandum, quia elegi cicatrices uulnerum super epulas regum et iactantiam potestatum. tu solus non me derelinquas, tu adhaereas seruulo tuo, qui de terra suscitas inopem et de stercore erigis pauperem. tuo comitatu fultus frequentiorem me ambientibus populis aestimabo. conputruerunt quidem cicatrices meae, sed adhuc tuorum uerberum desidero cicatrices, quae sanatis uulneribus obducuntur, ut postea nullum ulcus appareat.

I offered myself to be wounded, because I chose the scars of wounds above the banquets of kings and the boasting of powers. Do not you alone forsake me; you cling to your servant, who raise the needy from the earth and lift the poor from the dunghill. Supported by your company I will reckon myself more thronged than if peoples surrounded me. My scars have rotted indeed, but I still desire the scars of your blows, which close over healed wounds so that afterwards no sore appears.

37.55.3CSEL 64:180

bonae triumphalium uulnerum cicatrices, quibus uictores huius terreni proelii gloriantur: quanto inlustriora uulnera, quae pro fide et nominis tui gloria uidentur excepta! ista est cicatrix quae caelum aperit, regnum adquirit, inmortalitatem inuenit. haec est ergo, fratres, cicatrix beata, quoniam beati qui lauerunt stolas suas in sanguine suo. sic coepit stola esse gloriae caro mortis, in qua et Paulus ante periclitabatur electus dei, nisi petisset se liberari de corpore mortis huius, ut legimus.

Good are the scars of triumphal wounds, in which the victors of this earthly battle glory: how much more illustrious the wounds seen to be received for faith and the glory of your name! This is the scar that opens heaven, gains the kingdom, finds immortality. This, then, brothers, is the blessed scar, since blessed are those who have washed their robes in their own blood. So the flesh of death began to be a robe of glory, in which even Paul, God's chosen, was once in danger, had he not asked to be freed from the body of this death, as we read.

Explanation 37, chapter 56

37.56.1CSEL 64:180–181

Et ideo qui sumus in hoc corpore mortis oremus, ne bonus ille dilectus dei nos medicus derelinquat, quem patriarcha Dauid ne a se discederet precabatur. ipsi nos committamus parati curari quo uelit medicamento. nemo dicit medico corporis sui quemadmodum sit curandus. nouit medicus quae singulis uulneribus medicamenta conueniant, cuius ulceris putredo ferro sit amputanda, ne in totius corporis serpat exitium.

And so, we who are in this body of death, let us pray that that good physician, beloved of God, may not forsake us, whom the patriarch David prayed not to depart from him. Let us commit ourselves to him, ready to be cured with whatever medicine he wishes. No one tells the physician of his body how he is to be cured. The physician knows what medicines suit each wound, which ulcer's rot must be cut off with iron, lest it creep on to the destruction of the whole body.

37.56.2CSEL 64:181

si dixerit medicus medicinae genus, quo curari aeger debeat, et ille fastidiat, discedit medicus et aegrum relinquit. uide eum, qui curari uelit, omni genere medico adquiescentem, adtende ordinem. aperit primo uulnera sua medico et dicit: cura me, sed rogo ne in ira tua, quia non sustinent duram medicinam infirmitates meae. medicina Christi correptio est; corripit enim dominus quem uult conuertere. ideo et Paulus ad medicum dicit: argue obsecra increpa. non ergo recusat curari qui petit argui, sed leuari uult poenam, ne iracundia arguatur et impetu irae corripiatur.

If the physician names the kind of medicine by which the sick man should be cured, and he disdains it, the physician leaves and abandons the sick man. See him who wishes to be cured consenting to every kind of medicine; note the order. He first opens his wounds to the physician and says: cure me, but I ask, not in your anger, because my weaknesses do not bear harsh medicine. Christ's medicine is rebuke; for the Lord rebukes him whom he wishes to convert. So Paul too says to the physician: "Reprove, entreat, rebuke." He does not, then, refuse to be cured who asks to be reproved; but he wishes the penalty lightened, lest he be reproved in anger and chastened by the impetus of wrath.

Explanation 37, chapter 57

37.57.1CSEL 64:181

Et uide processum. primo petit argui, postea, quod maius est, corripi. deinde non solum confitetur peccata sua, sed etiam numerat et accusat; non uult enim sua latere delicta. nam ut febres, cum in alto sunt, non queunt mitigari, cum foras erumpunt, spem afferunt desinendi, ita peccatorum morbus dum tegitur inardescit, si confessionibus proditur euaporat.

And see the progress. First he asks to be reproved, then, what is greater, to be chastened. Then he not only confesses his sins but even counts them and accuses them; for he does not want his offenses to lie hidden. For as fevers, when deep within, cannot be soothed, but when they break out give hope of ending, so the disease of sins burns while it is covered, but evaporates if it is betrayed by confessions.

37.57.2CSEL 64:181

et ideo iustus accusator est sui in principio sermonis, priusquam contagio ulceris serpat intrinsecus; grauat enim conscientiam memoria delictorum, nisi medicina poscatur. et si differt medicus, aeger offerre se debet, ut citius secetur, sicut offerebat se Dauid in flagella domini dicens: redde mihi duplicia peccata, dummodo hic uindices; noli me deserere, noli auertere a me faciem tuam, noli dedignari atque horrescere faetorem uulnerum meorum.

And so "the just man is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech," before the contagion of the ulcer creeps inward; for the memory of offenses weighs on the conscience unless medicine is asked. And if the physician delays, the sick man must offer himself, to be cut sooner, as David offered himself to the Lord's scourges, saying: Repay me double for my sins, so long as you punish here; do not desert me, do not turn your face from me, do not disdain and shudder at the stench of my wounds.

37.57.3CSEL 64:181–182

et Iob seruulus tuus percussus erat ulcere a pedibus usque ad caput et remedium suae sanitatis inuenit, licet illud uulnus uirtutis fuerit, istud erroris. faetebant uulnera quae medici curare non possent. locutus es, domine, mysteria sacramentorum tuorum, manifestasti uenena serpentis et solius sermonis tui medicamento serui tui curata sunt uulnera, quia tu eum non deseruisti;

And Job your servant was struck with an ulcer from the feet to the head and found the remedy of his health, although that wound was of virtue, this of error. The wounds stank which physicians could not cure. You spoke, O Lord, the mysteries of your sacraments, you made plain the serpent's poisons, and by the medicine of your word alone your servant's wounds were cured, because you did not desert him;

37.57.4CSEL 64:182

et me non derelinquas, domine, ne discesseris a me. homines me dereliquerunt, quia sordent illis uulnera mea, quae pietati tuae putaui esse reseranda. illi dicunt: exi a nobis, quia peccator es tu, discede, ne nos polluas. tu autem, domine, curas et non pollueris, adiuuas et non contaminaris, quia deus salutis es, domine, et manus tua non perdere, sed sanare consueuit.

do not forsake me either, Lord; do not depart from me. Men have forsaken me, because my wounds, which I thought should be opened to your loving kindness, are foul to them. They say: Go away from us, because you are a sinner; depart, lest you pollute us. But you, Lord, cure and are not polluted, help and are not contaminated, because you are the God of salvation, Lord, and your hand is not wont to destroy but to heal.

Explanation 37, chapter 58

37.58.1CSEL 64:182

Compleuimus psalmum etiam cum eius interpretatione uersiculi, quem Graeci nonnulli codices, sed non omnes habent Latini. nam ante responsorium proximum uersiculus est: et proiecerunt me sicut mortuum abominatum, hoc est illi qui reddebant mihi mala pro bonis. sed tu ne derelinquas me, domine, ne discesseris a me — hoc enim sequitur —, id est:

We have completed the psalm, together with the interpretation of a verse which some Greek manuscripts have, but not all Latin ones. For before the nearest response there is the verse: "And they cast me off like an abominable dead man," that is, those who repaid me evil for good. "But do not forsake me, Lord, do not depart from me" (for this follows), that is:

37.58.2CSEL 64:182–183

tu ne derelinquas, qui mortuum faetentem curare consuesti. denique habemus hoc in euangelio: nam cum uenisset ad monumentum Lazari et dixisset: tollite lapidem, ait Martha: iam faetet, quatriduum enim habet. respondit ei: nonne dixi tibi, quia si credideris uidebis gloriam dei? et clamauit Lazarum et sanus exiuit. credamus ergo et nos, ut de uulneribus nobis adquiramus medicinam salutis et futuram gloriam.

do not forsake me, you who are wont to cure a stinking dead man. Indeed we have this in the gospel: for when he had come to Lazarus's tomb and said: "Take away the stone," Martha said: "He already stinks, for he has been four days." He answered her: "Did I not tell you that if you believe you will see the glory of God?" And he called Lazarus and he came out whole. Let us too, then, believe, so that from our wounds we may gain the medicine of salvation and future glory.

Explanation 37, chapter 59

37.59.1CSEL 64:183

in orationibus igitur et obsecrationibus, cum dolore et lacrimis exigenda paenitentia est, ut illam gloriam dei uidere mereamur. neque te moueat, quod luctus, dolor, commaceratio corporis grauissimae passiones sunt; etsi grauissimae uidentur, tamen indignae sunt huiusmodi passiones ad superuenturam gloriam, sicut testis est apostolus Paulus.

In prayers, then, and supplications, with grief and tears, penance must be carried out, so that we may deserve to see that glory of God. And let it not trouble you that mourning, grief, mortification of the body are the gravest sufferings; even if they seem gravest, yet such sufferings are not worthy to be compared with the glory to come, as the apostle Paul is witness.

37.59.2CSEL 64:183

non pigeat ergo nos hic leuiora deferre, ut ibi plena laudis et gloriae possimus adipisci, pro temporalibus laboribus perpetua praemia reportantes per dominum Iesum, cui laus, honor, gloria, perpetuitas a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

Let it not irk us, then, to bear lighter things here, so that there we may obtain things full of praise and glory, carrying off perpetual rewards for temporal labors, through the Lord Jesus, to whom be praise, honor, glory, eternity, from the ages and now and always and for all the ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 38, chapter 1

38.1.1CSEL 64:183

In superiore psalmo expressa forma paenitentiae est; in hoc sequenti patientiae forma signatur. quem psalmum Dauid scripsit et Idithun uiro disciplinis leuiticis et sacerdotalibus erudito canendum dedit, qui ante arcam domini seriem psalmorum pangendi sollertissimus praecinebat. ergo quia non Idithun scripsit hunc psalmum, sed propheta Dauid et Idithun uiro canendi perito psallendum dedit, ideo sic inscriptus est titulus.

In the previous psalm the pattern of penance was expressed; in this following one the pattern of patience is marked. This psalm David wrote and gave to Jeduthun, a man trained in the Levitical and priestly disciplines, to sing, who used to lead the singing before the ark of the Lord, most skilful at composing the series of psalms. So, because Jeduthun did not write this psalm, but the prophet David, and gave it to Jeduthun, a man skilled in singing, to sing, the title is inscribed thus.

38.1.2CSEL 64:183–184

denique etiam in saecularibus scriptis alii erant qui scribebant, alii qui in scaena uel cantica uel comoedias uel tragoedias canere consuerant. et illi quidem coronam Olympicam postulabant, unde et epinicium hymnum eorum scripta in fine testantur. Dauid autem, qui non haec serta coronarum marcentium requirebat, sed illam incorruptibilem et incontaminatam remunerationem, caelestium hereditatem pio desiderabat affectu, hymnum non uictoriae epi-

Indeed in secular writings too some were those who wrote, others those who used to sing on the stage either songs or comedies or tragedies. And they sought the Olympic crown, whence too their writings at the end bear witness to the epinician hymn. But David, who did not seek these garlands of fading crowns but that incorruptible and undefiled reward, and desired with pious affection the inheritance of heavenly things, wrote a hymn not epinician of victory,

38.1.3CSEL 64:184

nicium, sed ei scripsit, qui uictoriam in se credentibus inpertiebat, qui finis est omnium quae pia mente deposcimus. siue enim sapientiam quaeras siue uirtuti studeas siue ueritati siue uiae atque iustitiae siue resurrectioni, in omnibus tibi sequendus est Christus, qui est uirtus dei atque sapientia, ueritas uia iustitia resurrectio. ad quem igitur contendas nisi ad perfectionem omnium summamque uirtutum? et ideo tibi dicit: ueni sequere me, hoc est, ut ad consummationem uirtutum peruenire merearis. ergo qui sequitur Christum, ipsum pro possibilitate sua debet imitari, ut praecepta eius secum ipse meditetur et diuinorum exempla factorum.

but to him who imparts victory to those who believe in him, who is the end of all we ask with pious mind. For whether you seek wisdom, or pursue virtue, or truth, or the way and justice, or the resurrection, in all you must follow Christ, who is the power and wisdom of God, truth, way, justice, resurrection. To whom, then, would you strive but to the perfection of all and the summit of virtues? And so he says to you: "Come, follow me," that is, so that you may deserve to reach the consummation of virtues. He who follows Christ, then, ought to imitate him as far as he can, so as to meditate within himself his precepts and the examples of his divine deeds.

Explanation 38, chapter 2

38.2.1CSEL 64:184

Et ideo Dauid secum ipse meditabatur, quod Christum in se locutum esse retinebat, ut, cum aliqui ei essent molesti et eum ad contentionem lacessere conarentur, patientiam indueret, certandi studia declinaret, ex quibus inanis strepitus et iurgia frequenter oriuntur. ideoque cum sancto Dauid plerique eius uirtutibus inuidentes, qui eum de proposito mansuetudinis et humilitatis affectu crederent deducendum, frequenter ingruerent, ipsae quoque praecipue nequitiae in caelestibus spiritales, aduersus quas graue luctamen est iustis, ad commouendum eum ministros suae inprobitatis inpellerent, ne inter obstrepentium crebra certamina et

And so David meditated within himself, for he kept in mind that Christ had spoken in him, so that, when some were troublesome to him and tried to provoke him to contention, he might put on patience and avoid eagerness for disputing, from which empty din and quarrels often arise. And so, since many, envying the virtues of holy David, who thought he should be drawn away from his purpose of gentleness and the affection of humility, often attacked him, and the very spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places, against which the just have a heavy wrestling, especially drove the ministers of their wickedness to stir him up, lest amid the frequent contests of those who clamored and

38.2.2CSEL 64:184–185

disceptationis tumultus sermo aliqui sibi offensionis excideret, tacere sanctus propheta proposuit. o ualidum scutum circumspectae munitionis silentium o fidissimum stabilitatis fundamentum, in quo si quis potuerit stare lubricum uerbi timere non possit! multi enim etiam stabili corde firmati, incauti tamen sermonis fluctuantis errore saepe ceciderunt. uidens igitur huiusmodi insidiis et uano concertantium strepitu se propheta temptari intra se ipse tacitus conferebat legem sibi taciturnitatis inponens, et cum taceret insultantibus sibi et ut loqueretur aliquid prouocantibus — qualia solent insolentium esse certamina atque sermones: responde nobis, si de aequalitate praesumis; uides et tu esse te uictum et nihil habere quod referas —, cum se prope ad uocem conuiciis uideretur inpelli, se ipse reuocabat, ut loqueretur in corde:

the tumult of dispute some word of offense should slip from him, the holy prophet resolved to be silent. O silence, strong shield of circumspect defense; O most faithful foundation of stability, on which if anyone can stand he cannot fear the slip of a word! For many, even established with a stable heart, have yet often fallen through the error of careless, wavering speech. So, seeing himself tempted by snares of this kind and the vain din of disputants, the prophet consulted silently within himself, laying on himself a law of silence; and when he was silent to those who insulted him and provoked him to say something (such as are usually the contests and speeches of the insolent: "Answer us, if you presume to be our equal; you see that you too are beaten and have nothing to reply"), when he seemed almost driven to speak by the insults, he called himself back so as to speak in his heart:

Explanation 38, chapter 3

38.3.1CSEL 64:185

Dixi: custodiam uias meas, ut non delinquam in lingua mea; posui ori meo custodiam, dum consistit peccator aduersum me, hoc est: proposui confirmaui imperaui mihi, locutus sum cordi meo: uias meas custodiam. si aliis dixissem, sermo meus stare deberet; quanto magis stabile debet esse quod mihi ipse constitui! si quis alienum fallat indecorum est, si quis proximum graue; quanto igitur grauius, si quis se ipsum eo quod sibi promiserit putet esse fraudandum, ut ipse sibi infidelis suo iudicio et despicabilis aestimetur! cui igitur idoneus uideri potest qui sibi uilis est?

"I said: I will guard my ways, that I may not sin with my tongue; I set a guard on my mouth while the sinner stood against me"; that is: I resolved, I confirmed, I commanded myself, I spoke to my heart: I will guard my ways. If I had said it to others, my word ought to stand; how much more stable ought to be what I have laid down for myself! If anyone deceives a stranger, it is unseemly; if a neighbor, grave; how much graver, then, if anyone thinks he may cheat himself of what he has promised himself, so that he is judged faithless to himself and contemptible by his own judgment! To whom, then, can he seem fit who is cheap to himself?

38.3.2CSEL 64:185

teneamus igitur animae constantiam nostrae, ne in offensionem labia loquendi festina prorumpant. et Iob plagam suam silentio uicit et tolerantiam suam taciturnitate superauit. non bene creditur carni; uixissemus, si Eua tacuisset. ergo primum illud processit ex uoce peccatum et serpens ille nequissimus atque uersutus per uocem nos ante temptauit. atque utinam aut Adam surdus fuisset aut Eua obmutuisset, ille, ne uocem suae uxoris audiret, ista, ne loqueretur marito et lubricae uocis ministerio serpentis in uirum uenena transfunderet!

Let us hold, then, the constancy of our soul, lest lips hasty in speaking burst out into offense. Job too overcame his blow by silence and surpassed his endurance by taciturnity. The flesh is not well trusted; we would have lived had Eve been silent. So that first sin came out from a voice, and that most wicked and cunning serpent first tempted us through a voice. And would that either Adam had been deaf or Eve had been dumb: he, so as not to hear his wife's voice; she, so as not to speak to her husband and pour the serpent's poisons into her man through the ministry of a slippery voice!

38.3.3CSEL 64:185–186

Cain quoque, etsi parricidio naturam uiolauit humanam et obliterauit impius iura pietatis, tamen per uocem sacrilegium sceleri suo addidit, ut negaret deo necati fratris interitum. quid de singulis dicam? populus ipse electus a domino, cui tacitus Moyses aperuit mare, ingratus caelestibus beneficiis obmurmurabat, quo diuinam contraxit offensam. deinde ipsum ducem inuii illius atque inusitati itineris Moysen respuit et a fratre eius Aaron deos sibi fieri quos coleret postulauit.

Cain too, though he violated human nature by fratricide and ungodly blotted out the rights of family love, yet through his voice added sacrilege to his crime, so as to deny to God his murdered brother's death. Why speak of individuals? The very people chosen by the Lord, for whom silent Moses opened the sea, ungrateful for heavenly benefits, murmured, by which it incurred divine offense. Then it rejected Moses himself, the leader of that pathless and unaccustomed journey, and asked his brother Aaron to make it gods to worship.

Explanation 38, chapter 4

38.4.1CSEL 64:186

Unde etiam ipse considerans tanta uocis pericula dixit: custodiam uias meas. quae sint igitur istae uiae hominis quae magnopere praecauendae, ne quid grauioris offensionis incurrant, ammonet nos tantus propheta diligentius considerare, ammonet etiam Salomon eius filius paternae mentis interpres perspicacius examinare, qui scripsit: tria mihi sunt inpossibilia intellegere et quartum quod non agnosco: uestigium aquilae uolantis et uiam serpentis in petra et semitas nauis in pelago nauigantis et uias uiri in iuuentute (et mulieris adulterae

Hence, considering such dangers of the voice, he himself said: "I will guard my ways." What, then, these ways of man are that must be greatly guarded against, lest they incur some graver offense, so great a prophet warns us to consider more carefully; Solomon too, his son, interpreter of his father's mind, warns us to examine more keenly, who wrote: "Three things are impossible for me to understand, and a fourth I do not know: the track of an eagle flying, and the way of a serpent on a rock, and the paths of a ship sailing on the sea, and the ways of a man in his youth. [So is the way of an adulterous woman,

38.4.2CSEL 64:186–187

quae, postquam egit, abluta nihil se egisse dicit iniquum]. tria ergo inpossibilia sibi esse dixit ad intellegendum, quartum, quod ille habens inter homines sapientiae signaculum non agnosceret, uiarum uidelicet uiri in iuuentute processum. quarum igitur uel inexplicabilis uel difficilis agnitio, potest facilis earum esse custodia? unde non inmerito ipse Dauid delictorum iuuentutis suae non defensionem obtulit, sed obliuionem rogauit: delicta, inquit, iuuentutis meae et ignorantiae meae ne memineris. non inmerito igitur Salomon dixit se non agnoscere quod pater eius, in quo maior dei gratia fuit, se ignorasse testatus est.

who, when she has done it, washes and says she has done nothing wrong.]" He said, then, that three things were impossible for him to understand, and a fourth, which he who had among men the seal of wisdom did not know, namely the course of the ways of a man in youth. How, then, can the guarding of things whose knowledge is inexplicable or difficult be easy? Hence not without reason David himself offered no defense for the offenses of his youth, but asked for forgetting: "The offenses," he says, "of my youth and of my ignorance do not remember." Not without reason, then, did Solomon say he did not know what his father, in whom was greater grace of God, testified he had been ignorant of.

38.4.3CSEL 64:187

et fortasse delicta iuuentutis ad feruorem retulit carnis, ignorantiae autem ad uerborum prolapsionem, quae non ex sententia nostra, sed impetu quodam et cursu loquendi plerumque funduntur, quod periculosum esse propheta cognoscens ait: credidi, propter quod locutus sum. supra fundamentum ergo uirtutis uox tuta est, sine fundamento lubrica. ideo quasi quodam tubae sono scripturae diuinae electus interpres increpuit: corde creditur ad iustitiam, ore confessio fit ad salutem. fides credentium principalis est, confessio executionis.

And perhaps he referred the offenses of youth to the heat of the flesh, and those of ignorance to the slip of words, which are often poured out not from our considered judgment but by a kind of impulse and rush of speaking; knowing this to be dangerous, the prophet says: "I believed, therefore I spoke." On the foundation of virtue, then, the voice is safe; without a foundation it is slippery. So the chosen interpreter of divine Scripture rang out as with the sound of a trumpet: "With the heart one believes unto justice, with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." The faith of believers is the principal thing; confession is of the carrying out.

Explanation 38, chapter 5

38.5.1CSEL 64:187

Quomodo igitur proposuerit sanctus propheta Dauid aut propter quid custodire uias suas, audiamus: ut non, inquit, delinquam in lingua mea. si hoc cauet propheta, tu non caues? si hoc metuit in quo dei gratia loquebatur, tu non metuis, qui erroris uerba non refugis et theatralibus sermonibus delectaris? tu non reformidas, cui scriptum est in euangelio, quia pro omni otioso uerbo rationem es redditurus? si pro otioso uerbo periculum est, quanto magis pro criminoso!

How, then, or for what the holy prophet David resolved to guard his ways, let us hear: "that I may not sin," he says, "with my tongue." If the prophet guards against this, do you not guard? If he feared this in whom the grace of God spoke, do you not fear, who do not shun words of error and delight in theatrical speech? Do you not dread, to whom it is written in the gospel that for every idle word you will render an account? If there is danger for an idle word, how much more for a criminal one!

38.5.2CSEL 64:187

non omne, quod otiosum, et criminosum, sed omne, quod non fructuosum, periculosum atque eradicabile; omnis enim arbor non faciens fructum exciditur et in ignem mittitur. cum mouetur animus et exagitatur stimulantibus aduersariis, obstrepentibus inludentibus criminantibus, excidit uerbum commotionis; ideo silentium et tutum est et decorum, quod seruat cum grauitate cautelam.

Not everything idle is also criminal, but everything that is not fruitful is dangerous and to be uprooted; for every tree not bearing fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. When the mind is moved and stirred by adversaries goading, clamoring, mocking, accusing, a word of agitation slips out; so silence is both safe and seemly, keeping caution with gravity.

38.5.3CSEL 64:187–188

quid enim labia nostra nisi quaedam nostra uincula sunt? denique uinculis labiorum suorum unusquisque constringitur. ideo sapiens in tempore tacet et secum ipse considerat, quo tempore loqui debeat. de quo praeclare ipse Salomon: labia sapientis alligata sunt intellectu. quando ergo uides inludentibus proteruis sapientem tacere, dices: ligauit iste intellectu labia sua, hoc est prudenter tacet, ne labiorum suorum uinculis alligetur.

For what are our lips but a kind of chains of ours? Indeed each one is bound by the chains of his own lips. So the wise man is silent in season and considers within himself at what time he ought to speak. Of this Solomon himself excellently says: "The lips of the wise man are bound by understanding." So when you see a wise man silent while the wanton mock, you will say: this man has bound his lips with understanding, that is, he is prudently silent, lest he be bound by the chains of his lips.

38.5.4CSEL 64:188

posuit ori suo custodiam, saepsit aures suas spinis, uectem adhibuit foribus oris sui, seruat thesaurum cordis sui et argentum eloquii sui, ut examinatum et purgatum, quando oportet, proferat, ne quisquam prius fur in cor eius aut perturbator inrumpat et ad eos captiuum trahat, quibus flagitia sua uendat.

He has set a guard on his mouth, hedged his ears with thorns, put a bar on the doors of his mouth; he keeps the treasure of his heart and the silver of his speech, so as to bring it out, tried and purified, when it is fitting, lest any thief or disturber first break into his heart and drag him captive to those to whom he sells his shameful deeds.

Explanation 38, chapter 6

38.6.1CSEL 64:188

Meditabatur Iudas Christum uendere, sed reuocabat eum tanta domini gratia et quaedam paternae delenimenta pietatis, quibus furor eius molliebatur, nec erupisset in scelus, nisi se in cor eius, quia Christum fallere se putabat, aduersarius demersisset. non ergo dubites, quando aliqui tibi molesti sunt uolenti seruare

Judas meditated selling Christ, but the Lord's great grace and certain soothings of fatherly love called him back, by which his fury was softened; and he would not have burst into crime had not the adversary plunged himself into his heart, because he thought he could deceive Christ. So do not doubt, when some are troublesome to you as you wish to keep

38.6.2CSEL 64:188

iustitiam, ministros esse illius nequissimi peccatoris, qui omnium auctor est flagitiorum. uidebat Dauid propheticis oculis, agnoscebat eius figuram; ideo tacebat, ne illius faceret uoluntatem qui interturbare gestit affectum. premebat uocem, claudebat portas suas silentio, praetendebat in eo patientia et taciturnitatis uigilabat custodia, ne inimicus obreperet, ne de claustris oris uagus aliquis sermo et incautus exiret. ideo fortior est patiens qui se ipsum continet quam qui urbes capit. iustus ipse sibi claustrum est, ipse sibi peruigil custos.

justice, that they are ministers of that most wicked sinner who is the author of all shameful deeds. David saw with prophetic eyes, recognized his figure; so he was silent, lest he do the will of him who longs to disturb our feeling. He pressed down his voice, shut his gates with silence, patience stood guard in him and the watch of taciturnity was awake, lest the enemy creep in, lest some wandering and careless word go out of the bars of the mouth. So the patient man who restrains himself is stronger than he who takes cities. The just man is himself his own bar, himself his own watchful guard.

Explanation 38, chapter 7

38.7.1CSEL 64:188–189

Cum sibi ergo ipse praetenderet, loquebatur in suo corde: posui ori meo custodiam, dum consistit peccator aduersum me. adest semper inimicus, quia semper insidiatur. etsi illum non uides, adest, etsi illum non sentis, incursat. si non uides, uidenti crede: consistit, inquit, aduersum me. qui uidet peccatum suum, uidet etiam peccatorem sibi in his quae gesserit inludentem, qui autem peccatorem praeuiderit, potest uitare peccatum.

So, setting this before himself, he said in his heart: "I set a guard on my mouth while the sinner stood against me." The enemy is always present, because he always lies in wait. Even if you do not see him, he is present; even if you do not feel him, he attacks. If you do not see, believe one who sees: "He stands," he says, "against me." He who sees his sin also sees the sinner mocking him in what he has done; but he who has foreseen the sinner can avoid sin.

38.7.2CSEL 64:189

uidebat Dauid consistere aduersum se peccatorem, quando Semei maledicebat et lapidabat regem suum et clamabat: exi, uir sanguinum. neque enim tam praeruptus foret, ut nec tanti regis reuerentia moueretur nec armatum eius timeret exercitum, cum unus de exercitu eius conuiciantem potuisset occidere; sed amentem diabolus fecerat, qui eum inpellebat ad mortem. ideo Dauid aduersus auctorem magis proeliabatur quam ministrum persequebatur. quid enim magnum de homine inualido uindicari, quem ad furorem alter urgebat, in cuius nece peccator habuisset uoluntatis effectum?

David saw the sinner standing against him when Shimei cursed and stoned his king and cried: "Go out, man of blood." For he would not have been so reckless as to be moved neither by reverence for so great a king nor fear of his armed army, when one of his army could have killed the reviler; but the devil had made him mad, driving him to death. So David fought rather against the author than pursued the minister. For what great thing to take vengeance on a weak man whom another drove to fury, in whose death the sinner would have had the effect of his will?

38.7.3CSEL 64:189

non gladio diabolus, sed uerbo dei uincitur; ideo taceat lingua hominis, dei uerbum loquatur. denique et Christus tacebat ante Pilati iudicium constitutus, ut nobis daret formam tacendi, quia lingua corporis facilis est ad errorem, procliuis ad lapsum. sunt autem et qui tacentes loquantur sicut Moyses, qui stabat attonitus et tacebat, cui dixit tacenti deus: quid clamas ad me? ut Susanna, quae tacuit in periculis suis et dominus exaudiuit eam. ergo etiamsi in te uerbum dei sit, et tacebis in dei uerbo et tacitus clamabis, ut audiaris a Christo.

The devil is overcome not by the sword but by the word of God; so let man's tongue be silent, let God's word speak. Indeed Christ too was silent when set before Pilate's judgment, to give us a pattern of silence, because the tongue of the body is easy to error, prone to falling. And there are those who speak while silent, like Moses, who stood astonished and was silent, to whom, silent, God said: "Why do you cry to me?"; like Susanna, who was silent in her dangers and the Lord heard her. So even if the word of God is in you, you will be silent in the word of God and, silent, will cry out, so as to be heard by Christ.

Explanation 38, chapter 8

38.8.1CSEL 64:189

Meditare ergo quae Christi sunt, quae secum meditabatur propheta Dauid, in quo ea, quae secum in hoc psalmo meditatum esse se dicit, ante [in eo] locutus est Christus. sic enim scriptum est: ego autem, cum in aliquo molesti essent mihi, induebam me cilicio et humiliabam in ieiunio animam meam, et oratio mea in sinu meo conuertetur. quid est in aliquo?

Meditate, then, on the things of Christ, on which the prophet David meditated within himself, in whom Christ spoke before what he says in this psalm that he meditated within himself. For so it is written: "But I, when they were troublesome to me in anything, put on sackcloth and humbled my soul with fasting, and my prayer will return into my bosom." What is "in anything"?

38.8.2CSEL 64:189–190

quia tunc maxime aut sermo non oportunus elabitur aut affectus mouetur, quando uel in dolore aliquo aut tristitia sumus uel indignatione animus aegrescit uel aliquibus sollicitudinibus impeditur aut disceptationibus occupatur. qui igitur molesti? primum de ipso auctore pec-

Because it is then above all that either an untimely word slips out or the feeling is moved, when we are in some pain or sadness, or the mind is sick with indignation, or hindered by some anxieties, or occupied with disputes. Who, then, are the troublesome ones? First understand it of the very author of

38.8.3CSEL 64:190

cati et angelis eius intellege, deinde de his qui malunt sequaces eius esse quam Christi. impellitur uxor, ut sancti Iob, amicus, quod in ipso libro manifestatur, filius, ut Abessalon, seruus, libertus atque domesticus, quia inimici hominis etiam domestici eius, ut exagitent eum singuli. quod igitur remedium aduersum huiusmodi animorum aegritudines nisi patientia, nisi silentium? et, quod est grauius, ille te magis lacessit, qui beneficiis tuis usus sit, et inter ipsos amplius ille exasperat, qui plus tibi debeat, quo magis ingrati hominis acerbitate aut uilis alicuius personae indignitate mouearis.

sin and of his angels, then of those who prefer to be his followers rather than Christ's. A wife is driven on, as holy Job's was; a friend, as is shown in that same book; a son, as Absalom; a slave, a freedman and a member of the household, because a man's enemies are those of his own household, so that each one may harass him. What remedy, then, against such sicknesses of souls but patience, but silence? And, what is graver, he provokes you more who has enjoyed your kindnesses, and among them he exasperates more who owes you more, so that you are moved the more by the bitterness of an ungrateful man or the unworthiness of some mean person.

Explanation 38, chapter 9

38.9.1CSEL 64:190

Ergo iustus, etsi amicus ei est insolens, dolet pro amico, quia ita amicus suus labitur, quia a temptatore impellitur. si pro amico dolet, multo magis pro uxore, pro filio, si eos quoque sibi insolentes experiatur, et si frater exagitat, ut Esau sanctum Iacob, dolet et quaerit sibi fratrem reconciliare uel fugere a facie eius, ut Rebecca suadebat, ne iracundia fratris occasionem nocendi aliquam repperiret, et si proximus aut domesticus, dolet, et si minister aut libertus

So the just man, even if his friend is insolent to him, grieves for his friend, because his friend slips so, because he is driven by the tempter. If he grieves for a friend, much more for a wife, for a son, if he finds them too insolent to him; and if a brother harasses him, as Esau did holy Jacob, he grieves and seeks to reconcile his brother to himself or to flee from his face, as Rebekah advised, lest his brother's anger find some occasion to harm; and if a neighbor or member of the household, he grieves; and if a servant or freedman,

38.9.2CSEL 64:190–191

aut seruus, fert patienter et in his omnibus tacet, ne ei respondeat a quo eum cernit impelli. conuiciatur ergo ex domesticis aliquis: dolet et tacet; conuiciatur libertus: tacet; conuiciatur seruus: tacet. sic uincitur qui laqueum eius animae per escam uocis extendit. tace ergo et tu, cum tibi indignus conuiciatur, tace, cum tibi seruus et maxime tuus contumeliam facit, et dic in corde tuo: ego taceo, tu autem ne taceas, domine, et adde: ne discedas a me, ut Dauid propheta dicebat, hoc est: ne solum me inpugnantibus derelinquas; non est enim solus cui deus praesens est. accipe testimonium: ecce, inquit, uenit hora ut dispergamini unusquisque in sua et me solum relinquatis; sed non sum solus, quoniam pater mecum est.

or a slave, he bears it patiently and in all these is silent, lest he answer him by whom he sees him driven. Someone of the household reviles him: he grieves and is silent; a freedman reviles him: he is silent; a slave reviles him: he is silent. So he is overcome who stretches the snare for his soul with the bait of the voice. Be silent, then, you too, when an unworthy person reviles you; be silent when a slave, and especially your own, insults you, and say in your heart: "I am silent; but you, Lord, do not be silent," and add: "Do not depart from me," as David the prophet said; that is: do not leave me alone to those who attack me; for he is not alone to whom God is present. Take the testimony: "Behold," he says, "the hour comes when you will be scattered each to his own and leave me alone; but I am not alone, for the Father is with me."

Explanation 38, chapter 10

38.10.1CSEL 64:191

Iustus ergo aduersus insolentes sibi tacet, iustus orat. audi iustum orantem: pro eo ut me diligerent detrahebant mihi, ego autem orabam. iustus maledicentibus sibi benedicit, ut faciebant apostoli, sicut Paulus asserit dicens: maledicimur et benedicimus. iustus diligit inimicos suos. uide quemadmodum paulatim per gradus singulos ascendere docetur ad incrementa uirtutum dicente domino: diligite inimicos uestros.

The just man, then, is silent against those insolent to him; the just man prays. Hear the just man praying: "Instead of loving me they slandered me, but I prayed." The just man blesses those who curse him, as the apostles did, as Paul declares, saying: "We are cursed and we bless." The just man loves his enemies. See how he is taught to climb little by little, step by step, to the increase of virtues, as the Lord says: "Love your enemies."

38.10.2CSEL 64:191

iustus orat pro calumniantibus, quia et hoc praecepit dominus adiungens: benefacite his qui oderunt uos, orate pro calumniantibus et persequentibus uos. ipse est per omnia iustus, qui haec custodit et seruat, primum quia tacet et non respondet inimicis, deinde quia orat, hoc est non est otiosus affectu. et qui orat bona orat, non ea quaecumque possint suo inimico nocere. plus est ergo orare quam tacere. iustus maledicentibus sibi benedicit.

The just man prays for those who slander him, because the Lord commanded this too, adding: "Do good to those who hate you, pray for those who slander and persecute you." He is just in all things who guards and keeps these: first because he is silent and does not answer his enemies, then because he prays, that is, is not idle in feeling. And he who prays prays for good things, not whatever could harm his enemy. It is more, then, to pray than to be silent. The just man blesses those who curse him.

38.10.3CSEL 64:191

plus est hoc quam orare pro se; securus enim sui benedicit ei quem non timet aut etiam ei quem ante metuebat. iustus diligit inimicum. plus est diligere quam benedicere, quia maior est mentis dilectio quam sermonis gratia. iustus benefacit ei cuius odiis appetitus est, iustus orat pro calumniantibus. bona caritas et pietas bona; utrumque dei et utrumque est deus, quia caritas est deus, ut dixit Iohannes in epistula.

This is more than praying for oneself; for, secure about himself, he blesses one he does not fear, or even one he feared before. The just man loves his enemy. It is more to love than to bless, because love of the mind is greater than the grace of speech. The just man does good to him by whose hatred he has been attacked; the just man prays for those who slander him. Good is love and good is piety; both are of God, and both are God, because God is love, as John said in his epistle.

38.10.4CSEL 64:191–192

ideo utrumque coniunctum est: diligite inimicos uestros et orate pro calumniantibus et persequentibus uos. plenitudo legis est caritas, sed etiam haec euangelii plenitudo, pro calumniantibus et persequentibus nos orare, ut peccatis eorum ueniam postulemus, sicut diuino iudicio Iob sanctus electus est, cuius oratio regum illorum calumniantium iusto aboleret offensam.

So both are joined: "Love your enemies and pray for those who slander and persecute you." Love is the fullness of the law, but this too is the fullness of the gospel, to pray for those who slander and persecute us, asking pardon for their sins, as holy Job was chosen by divine judgment, whose prayer would abolish the offense of those kings who slandered the just man.

Explanation 38, chapter 11

38.11.1CSEL 64:192

Ergo et si infirmus es ora et si fortis es ora; infirmus pro te oras, fortis pro inimico tuo oras. bonum scutum infirmitatis oratio; tu oras et dominus te protegit. bonum scutum etiam triumphantis, ut inimicum tuum, quem possis ferire, defendas, ne ab aliquo trucidetur et, quod est maius, a Christo, qui dixit:

So, whether you are weak, pray, and whether you are strong, pray; weak, you pray for yourself; strong, you pray for your enemy. Prayer is a good shield of weakness: you pray and the Lord protects you. A good shield also of one triumphant, so that you defend your enemy, whom you could strike, lest he be slain by someone, and, what is more, by Christ, who said:

38.11.2CSEL 64:192

mihi uindictam, ego retribuam. haec est oratio quae in sinum conuertitur deprecantis, fructum referens eorum quae uoluit impetrare, ut dona in eius animam ac mentem recurrant quae poposcit a domino, sicut in posterioribus hic idem propheta te docuit dicens: sic benedicam te in uita mea et in nomine tuo leuabo manus meas. tam-

"Vengeance is mine, I will repay." This is the prayer that returns into the bosom of the one praying, bringing back the fruit of what he wished to obtain, so that the gifts he asked of the Lord return into his soul and mind, as this same prophet taught you in later psalms, saying: "So I will bless you in my life, and in your name I will lift up my hands. As

38.11.3CSEL 64:192

quam adipe et pinguedine repleatur anima mea. ipse est sinus animae secretum orationis eius, penetralia uoluntatis et quaedam recurrentium uotorum intima receptacula. unde et iusti in Abrahae sinu requiescere leguntur, quod in eius gratia, in eius requie, in eius placiditate requiescant, qui conformem ei induerint fidem et eandem in bonis operibus fecerint uoluntatem.

with fat and fatness let my soul be filled." This is the bosom of the soul: the secret of its prayer, the inner rooms of its will and certain inmost receptacles of returning prayers. Hence too the just are read to rest in Abraham's bosom, because they rest in his grace, in his rest, in his calm, who have put on a faith like his and done the same will in good works.

Explanation 38, chapter 12

38.12.1CSEL 64:192

Sed forte miretur aliquis, cum dominus dixerit per os Dauid, quod humiliabat in ieiunio animam suam, quomodo ipse Dauid ait in posterioribus: si non humiliter sentiebam, sed exaltaui animam meam. uerum is consideret aliud esse quod ad sapientiam mentis refertur, aliud quod ad humilitatem cordis.

But perhaps someone may wonder, since the Lord said through David's mouth that he humbled his soul with fasting, how David himself says in later psalms: "If I was not humbly minded, but exalted my soul." But let him consider that it is one thing that refers to the wisdom of the mind, another to the humility of the heart.

38.12.2CSEL 64:192–193

sapientia mentis sublimis est, sapientia autem carnis non debet inflari. humiliabat ergo in ieiunio animam suam, ut castigandum nostrae carnis tumorem doceret, exaltabat animam propheta per sublimem dei gratiam, quoniam et qui se exaltat humiliabitur et qui se humiliat exaltabitur. nec solum superbus retunditur et humilis attollitur digna remuneratione meritorum, sicut primum est intellegendum; sed quia uerbum dei ex omni parte acutum est uelut gladius, qui ex tribus acutus est partibus, ego arbitror posse intellegi, quia et qui se exaltat nouit se humiliare et qui se humiliare nouit etiam exaltare se nouit. denique Paulus ostendit dicens:

The wisdom of the mind is sublime, but the wisdom of the flesh ought not to be puffed up. So he humbled his soul with fasting, to teach that the swelling of our flesh must be chastised; the prophet exalted his soul through the sublime grace of God, since "he who exalts himself will be humbled and he who humbles himself will be exalted." And not only is the proud beaten back and the humble raised by a worthy reward of merits, as must first be understood; but because the word of God is sharp on every side like a sword, which is sharp on three sides, I think it can be understood that he who exalts himself knows how to humble himself, and he who knows how to humble himself also knows how to exalt himself. Indeed Paul shows it, saying:

38.12.3CSEL 64:193

ego autem didici in quibus sum sufficiens esse. scio et humiliari, scio et abundare. ergo et Dauid non humiliter sentiendo de Christo exaltabat animam suam, quam humiliant et deiciunt Arriani, et exaltando animam suam sensus uigore fideique gratia uirtutem humilitatis pio repraesentabat affectu.

"But I have learned to be content in whatever state I am. I know how to be humbled and I know how to abound." So David too, by not thinking humbly of Christ, exalted his soul, which the Arians humble and cast down; and by exalting his soul with vigor of sense and grace of faith he displayed the virtue of humility with pious affection.

Explanation 38, chapter 13

38.13.1CSEL 64:193

Ideo ergo dicebat: ommutui et humiliatus sum et silui a bonis, quia nouerat, quando se humiliare deberet, et nouerat, quando silere deberet. ommutuit, ne ipse litigiosa cum obiurgantibus contentione perstreperet, humiliatus est, ut tumorem deiceret superborum uel ut ipsos, quomodo humiliare se deberent, suo doceret exemplo. siluit a bonis, quia bona conscientia non eget defensione uerborum, quae suo nixa est testimonio, ipsa sui iudex. ideoque iustus dicit: quis contradicat aut quis resistat mihi? et Paulus dicit: mihi enim pro minimo est ut a uobis diiudicer aut ab humano die.

So he said: "I was dumb and was humbled and kept silent from good things," because he knew when he ought to humble himself and knew when he ought to be silent. He was dumb, lest he make a din with quarrelsome contention with those who rebuked him; he was humbled, to cast down the swelling of the proud or to teach them by his example how they ought to humble themselves. He kept silent from good things, because a good conscience needs no defense of words, resting on its own testimony, itself its own judge. And so the just man says: "Who will contradict or who will resist me?" and Paul says: "For to me it is a very small thing to be judged by you or by a human day."

38.13.2CSEL 64:193–194

aduersum calumniantes et peccatores iustus suo iudicio contentus est, meritorum autem suorum iudicium Christo reseruat. ideoque addidit: qui diiudicat me dominus est. pulcherrime eum iudicem elegit qui nulla fraude fallatur, ut eum nec occulta praetereant nec infirmae condicionis lapsus offendat, qui fragilitati norit ignoscere. ad omnia igitur utile silentium. si peccatum agnoscis, tace, ne negando exaggeres; si non agnoscis, tace securus de innocentia. non possunt aliena uerba crimen affigere quod propria non recipit conscientia.

Against slanderers and sinners the just man is content with his own judgment, but reserves the judgment of his merits to Christ. And so he added: "He who judges me is the Lord." Most finely he chose as judge one who is deceived by no fraud, whom neither hidden things escape nor the slip of a weak condition offends, who knows how to forgive frailty. Silence, then, is useful for everything. If you acknowledge sin, be silent, lest by denying you magnify it; if you do not acknowledge it, be silent, secure in your innocence. Others' words cannot fix on you a crime which your own conscience does not admit.

Explanation 38, chapter 14

38.14.1CSEL 64:194

Sequitur: et dolor meus renouatus est. adhuc in inferiore uirtutis gradu positus haec uerba depromit, quod dolor sibi peccatorum ueterum obiectione renouatus sit, quae deleta iam obduxisse uidebatur obliuio uel bonorum operum texerat compensatio. denique in posterioribus quasi fortior dicit: uiderunt me et mouerunt capita sua, eo quod minarentur et nocere non possent, et addidit:

There follows: "And my grief was renewed." Still placed on a lower step of virtue, he utters these words, that his grief was renewed by the reproach of old sins, which forgetfulness, now that they were blotted out, seemed to have covered, or the compensation of good works had hidden. Indeed in later psalms, as one stronger, he says: "They saw me and shook their heads," because they threatened and could not harm, and he added:

38.14.2CSEL 64:194

maledicent illi et tu benedices. et hoc quasi ualidior loquitur neglegens iniuriae uel pudoris, cui benedictio domini pro omnibus abundaret. ergo in isto psalmo tricesimo octauo quasi in quadam meditatione, nondum tamen in omni locatus perfectione uirtutis dicit sibi dolorem esse renouatum.

"They will curse and you will bless." And this he says as one stronger, heedless of injury or shame, for whom the Lord's blessing abounded for all. So in this thirty-eighth psalm, as in a kind of meditation, not yet set in all perfection of virtue, he says his grief was renewed.

38.14.3CSEL 64:194

ualidissimus enim cicatricis offensionem sentire non nouit nec plagam potest timere qui fortior est. in ipso pugilum certamine solet plerumque qui fortior est expectare, ut inferioris ictu aliquo lacessatur, quo acrior offensus insurgat; ita exercitatione nimia atque patientia roboratur, ut tamquam insensibilis ad dolorem plagam sentire non possit, percussus ridet, lacessitus minatur. at uero inferior si forte ictum ferientis supra obductam cicatricem ueteris uulneris exceperit, renouatum sentit dolorem. sic est cui obiciuntur peccata superiora quae competenter

For the strongest man does not know how to feel the hurt of a scar, nor can he fear a blow who is stronger. In the very contest of boxers the stronger often waits to be provoked by some blow of the weaker, so as to rise up more fiercely when struck; so he is strengthened by much exercise and patience, that, as if insensible to pain, he cannot feel a blow: struck, he laughs; provoked, he threatens. But the weaker, if he happens to receive the striker's blow on the scar of an old wound, feels the pain renewed. So it is with one to whom former sins are thrown up, which he fittingly

38.14.4CSEL 64:194–195

doluit atque defleuit, ut satisfactione congrua uulneri peccatorum suorum obduceret cicatricem. si perfectus est, tacet conuiciantibus nullo sibi dolore renouato, quia, etsi peccauit, securus est, quia sine paenitentia sunt dei dona et ideo quae semel donauit resoluere ac renouare non soleat, cum ipse dixerit: ego sum ego sum, qui deleo iniquitates et memor non ero. si autem inperfectus et inmemor caelestium praeceptorum, dolor ei tamquam recisa cicatrice reparatur.

grieved over and wept, so as to cover the wound of his sins with a scar by fitting satisfaction. If he is perfect, he is silent to revilers, with no grief renewed in him, because, even if he sinned, he is secure, because the gifts of God are without repentance, and so he is not wont to undo and renew what he has once forgiven, since he himself said: "I am, I am he who blots out iniquities and will not remember." But if he is imperfect and unmindful of the heavenly precepts, his grief is restored as if the scar were cut open.

Explanation 38, chapter 15

38.15.1CSEL 64:195

Concaluit cor meum intra me et in meditatione mea exardescet ignis. grauiora uulnera, sicut nouimus, caustico medicamento uel admoto igne curantur. ergo uir sapiens ipse medicus est sibi; tamen, etsi medicus est, uulnus suum urit ideoque, si non plene consummatus est ad inoffensae habitudinem sanitatis, uaporatur eius cor, habet febrem, ignescit ad obiecta conuicia et, si tacet, uel intra se teritur.

"My heart grew hot within me, and in my meditation a fire will blaze." Graver wounds, as we know, are cured with a caustic medicine or with fire applied. So the wise man is himself his own physician; yet, though he is a physician, he burns his wound; and so, if he is not fully perfected to the condition of unharmed health, his heart steams, has a fever, takes fire at insults thrown at him, and, if he is silent, is ground within himself.

38.15.2CSEL 64:195

lapis si ad lapidem teratur, ignem excutit. ita ergo etiam bona conscientia pudore succenditur, si renouetur ei suorum recordatio delictorum, et in ipsa meditatione ignis exardescit. non malus ignis qui adurat, sed non exurat; talis ignis quem Moyses in rubo uidit, quando rubus urebatur, sed non exurebatur.

If stone is struck against stone, it strikes out fire. So, then, even a good conscience is kindled by shame if the memory of its offenses is renewed, and in its very meditation a fire blazes. Not an evil fire, which scorches but does not burn up; such was the fire Moses saw in the bush, when the bush was burning but was not consumed.

38.15.3CSEL 64:195

est ergo ignis, qui peccatum minuit et suo culpam ardore depascit. est et ignis, qui caelestium scripturarum meditationibus excitatur, uelut ille de quo dicit Hieremias: et erat ignis flammigerans in ossibus meis, aut ille de quo Cleophas et qui simul iter agebat, quando post resurrectionem eis se Christus adiunxit, sermone mutuo conferebant dicentes: nonne cor nostrum ardens erat in nobis, cum aperiret nobis scripturas? ideo et dominus uenit, ut ignem hunc in terram mitteret, quo inluminaret animas uniuersorum, studium accenderet, crimen exureret.

There is, then, a fire which lessens sin and feeds on guilt with its heat. There is also a fire which is kindled by meditations on the heavenly Scriptures, like that of which Jeremiah says: "And there was a flaming fire in my bones," or that of which Cleopas and he who walked with him, when Christ joined them after the resurrection, spoke together, saying: "Was not our heart burning within us, when he opened the Scriptures to us?" And so the Lord came to send this fire on the earth, by which to enlighten the souls of all, kindle zeal, burn up crime.

Explanation 38, chapter 16

38.16.1CSEL 64:195–196

Locutus sum in lingua mea: notum fac mihi, domine, finem meum et numerum dierum meorum qui est, ut sciam quid desit mihi. bonus ignis, qui fecit ut propheta loqueretur. et uide ne ipse sit ignis, qui uisus est quando in die pentecostes in unum locum discipulis congregatis decidit cum ui magna super eos spiritus sanctus et linguis uariis loquebantur. sic enim scriptum est, quia uisae sunt linguae eorum dispersae tamquam ignis.

"I spoke with my tongue: make known to me, Lord, my end and the number of my days, what it is, that I may know what is lacking to me." Good is the fire which made the prophet speak. And see whether it is not that fire which was seen when, on the day of Pentecost, with the disciples gathered in one place, the Holy Spirit fell upon them with great force and they spoke in various tongues. For so it is written, that their tongues were seen divided like fire.

38.16.2CSEL 64:196

hic est ergo qui dixit ad Hieremiam: ecce do tibi in os uerba mea ignem. hanc ergo et Dauid linguam ignis accepit, ut diuinae cognitionis succensus ardore loqueretur: notum fac mihi, domine, finem meum. non de morte sua quaerit — neque enim hic finis resurrecturo —, sed de eo fine quaerit de quo apostolus dixit: quia ille finis, quando dominus Iesus tradet regnum deo et patri et euacuabit omnes principatus et potestates

This, then, is he who said to Jeremiah: "Behold, I give my words into your mouth as fire." This tongue of fire David too received, so as to speak kindled by the ardor of divine knowledge: "Make known to me, Lord, my end." He does not ask about his death (for this is no end for one who will rise again), but about that end of which the apostle said: "For that is the end, when the Lord Jesus hands over the kingdom to God the Father and abolishes all principalities and powers

38.16.3CSEL 64:196

et quando mors nouissima omnium destruetur, ut mala deficiant et bona aeterna succedant. et ideo dictum est: fugit dolor, tristitia et gemitus. hunc finem in hominibus operabatur et Paulus dicens: aut quis est qui laetificat me nisi qui contristatur ex me? obiurgando enim dolorem, tristitiam, gemitus excitabat,

and when death, the last of all, is destroyed," so that evils may cease and eternal goods follow. And so it is said: "Pain, sadness and groaning have fled." This end Paul too was working in men, saying: "Or who is it that gladdens me but he who is saddened by me?" For by rebuking he roused pain, sadness, groaning,

38.16.4CSEL 64:196

ut agerent paenitentiam, quo inreuocabilem ueniam et salutem, cuius non paeniteret deum, mererentur. ille igitur uerus est finis qui non unius erit finis, sed omnium. quomodo ergo finem meum dixit? sed considera quis loquatur. utique homo uel unus ex hominibus usus communitate substantiae uel qui ad formam uniuersorum describitur et ad perfectionem consummati hominis eruditur.

so that they might do penance, by which they might deserve irrevocable pardon and salvation, of which God would not repent. That, then, is the true end, which will be the end not of one but of all. How, then, did he say "my end"? But consider who is speaking. Surely a man, either one among men sharing the common substance, or one who is portrayed in the form of all and instructed toward the perfection of the complete man.

Explanation 38, chapter 17

38.17.1CSEL 64:196–197

Unde et addidit notum sibi fieri numerum dierum qui est, ut sciat quid desit sibi, ad perfectionem utique quid desit, non ad istius corporis uitam, de quo propheta Dauid cupiebat absolui dicens: heu me quod incolatus meus prolongatus est! habitaui cum habitantibus Cedar. denique dierum numerum cognoscere uolebat, non etiam noctium. hic.

Hence he also added that the number of his days, what it is, be made known to him, so that he may know what is lacking to him, lacking for perfection, surely, not for the life of this body, from which the prophet David desired to be released, saying: "Woe is me, that my sojourning is prolonged! I have dwelt with the dwellers of Kedar." Indeed he wanted to know the number of days, not also of nights. Here

38.17.2CSEL 64:197

enim dies et noctes sunt, ibi uero dies soli, ibi lumen perpetuum atque diuturnum. et ideo addidit: qui est. qui est, inquit, non qui transeat; caelum enim et terra praeteribunt, fides autem permanet et dies Christi, quia heri et hodie ipse est et in saecula. quem autem numerum quaerat, accipe: in domo, inquit, patris mei mansiones multae sunt.

there are days and nights, but there days alone; there light is perpetual and lasting. And so he added: "what it is." "What is," he says, not what passes; for heaven and earth will pass away, but faith remains and the day of Christ, because he is the same yesterday and today and for ever. And what number he seeks, hear: "In my Father's house," he says, "are many mansions."

38.17.3CSEL 64:197

dat ergo unicuique locum dominus Iesus, hoc est aptam pro uniuscuiusque meritis mansionem; unusquisque enim in suo ordine. praecessit ergo, ut pararet in se credentibus locum; unde etiam ait: si abiero et praeparauero uobis locum, iterum uenio ad uos et accersiam uos ad me ipsum, ut ubi ego sum uos sitis. et quo uado uos scitis et uiam scitis. est ergo uia per quam resurgens Christus ascendit.

The Lord Jesus, then, gives each a place, that is, a mansion fitting the merits of each; for "each in his own order." He went ahead, then, to prepare a place for those who believe in him; hence he also says: "If I go away and prepare a place for you, I come again to you and will take you to myself, so that where I am you may be. And where I am going you know, and you know the way." There is, then, a way by which Christ, rising, ascended.

38.17.4CSEL 64:197–198

et ille quidem ascendit super omnes caelos ad dei sedem, homines autem a primo caelo ad secundum et deinceps a secundo ad tertium et ab illo per distinctiones fere ad septimum caelum atque in ipsam apsidem et summitatem caeli qui merentur ascendunt. si ergo numerus uiarum est et numerus mansionum, utique numerus dierum est per quos ad caeli altitudinem peruenitur.

And he indeed ascended above all the heavens to God's seat; but men ascend, those who deserve it, from the first heaven to the second and then from the second to the third, and from that by stages almost to the seventh heaven and into the very vault and summit of heaven. If, then, there is a number of ways and a number of mansions, surely there is a number of days by which one reaches the height of heaven.

Explanation 38, chapter 18

38.18.1CSEL 64:198

Ecce, inquit, ueteres posuisti dies meos. alius habet: palaestas posuisti dies meos. si secundum Septuaginta uiros ueteres accipimus dies, hoc est: secundum ueterem hominem intellegimus exactos. sed uetus homo noster affixus est cruci; ergo et uetus dies praeteriit, nouus uenit. alius enim dies hominis, alius dies Christi quem Abraham uidit et gauisus est, de quo et Dauid ait:

"Behold," he says, "you have made my days old." Another has: "You have made my days handbreadths." If, according to the Seventy, we take "old days," that is, we understand them as spent according to the old man. But our old man has been fixed to the cross; so the old day too has passed, the new has come. For one is the day of man, another the day of Christ which Abraham saw and rejoiced, of which David too says:

38.18.2CSEL 64:198

hic est dies quem fecit dominus; exultemus et laetemur in eo. sanctus ergo in die domini exultat, in die nouo in quo deus dominus inluxit nobis et dedit nouam lucem innoxiam uitam et integram reformatis. ideo uir iustus securus nouae lucis et gratiae dei dicit: erit mihi caelum nouum et terra noua et nouum lumen. non enim lucerna et lumen solis illic lucebit aut lunae, sed dominus inluminabit super populum suum. illa ergo desideraui, illa exoptaui et ideo diem hominis non requisiui.

"This is the day which the Lord has made; let us exult and rejoice in it." The saint, then, exults in the day of the Lord, in the new day in which God the Lord has shone on us and given a new light, an innocent and whole life to those re-formed. So the just man, secure of the new light and grace of God, says: there will be for me a new heaven and a new earth and a new light. For no lamp nor light of the sun or moon will shine there, but the Lord will give light upon his people. Those things, then, I have desired, those I have longed for, and so I have not sought the day of man.

Explanation 38, chapter 19

38.19.1CSEL 64:198

Quodsi palaestas accipimus dies, ex nomine intellegimus plenos certaminis et laboris, quoniam palaestae luctatores in agone dicuntur qui luctantur ad coronam. ergo quia et nobis lucta non solum aduersus carnem et sanguinem est, sed et aduersus spiritalia nequitiae in caelestibus, dies nostri;

But if we take the days as "handbreadths" (palaestae), we understand from the name days full of contest and labor, since palaestae are the name for wrestlers in the contest who wrestle for the crown. So, because we too have a wrestling not only against flesh and blood but also against spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places, our days,

38.19.2CSEL 64:198–199

hoc est uitae istius, in labore sunt et dolore. unde et in posterioribus ait: anni nostri sicut aranea meditabantur. dies annorum nostrorum in ipsis septuaginta anni, si autem in potentatibus, octoginta anni, et plurimum eorum labor et dolor. unde et apostolus Paulus abundantius ceteris apostolis laborauit, ut legitime certando ad coronam quam cuperet perueniret.

that is, of this life, are in labor and grief. Hence too in later psalms he says: "Our years were meditated like a spider. The days of our years in them are seventy years, but if in strength, eighty years, and most of them labor and grief." Hence the apostle Paul too labored more abundantly than the other apostles, so as by striving lawfully to reach the crown he desired.

Explanation 38, chapter 20

38.20.1CSEL 64:199

Sed tamen, quia et architectorum mensurae palaestae dici feruntur, quibus ad structurae numerum uel modum spatii colligendum aedificia metiuntur locumque eum, in quo aedificia sunt locanda, et quia per Esaiam locutus est deus: quis mensus est manu aquam et caelum palmo et uniuersam terram clausa manu? quis statuit montes in statera?, uideamus, ne forte hic sensus hoc sermone sit colligendus, eo quod cognitos dies omnium habeat deus, cui nihil inmensum sit, qui omnia mensura quadam suae scientiae comprehendat, nihilque ei sit inaestimabile, nihil inexaminatum atque inenumerabile, qui ait: sed et capilli capitis uestri omnes numerati sunt.

But yet, since the measures of architects are also said to be called palaestae, by which they measure buildings to gather the number of the structure or the extent of the space and the place in which buildings are to be set; and since God spoke through Isaiah: "Who has measured the water with his hand and heaven with his span and the whole earth with closed hand? Who has set the mountains in a balance?", let us see whether this sense is not perhaps to be gathered from this word: that God has the days of all known, to whom nothing is immeasurable, who comprehends all things by a kind of measure of his knowledge, and to whom nothing is beyond estimate, nothing unexamined and innumerable, who says: "But even the hairs of your head are all numbered."

38.20.2CSEL 64:199–200

hoc ergo dicit propheta: ecce nouisti dies meos, non te praetereunt cotidiani actus mei, peccata mea ante oculos tuos posuisti et ideo substantia mea tamquam nihil ante te. quid enim est homo nisi quia memor eius es? homo uanitati similis factus est, homo in peccato et, si aliquid habeat probitatis atque uirtutis, recte ceteris terrenis animantibus antefertur et in conspectu animalium quibus est praepositus antecellit, in conspectu autem dei tamquam nihil est eius substantia. unde et alibi ait: quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis homo uiuens, quod Symmachus manifestius expressit dicens: et uita mea tamquam nihil ante te.

This, then, the prophet says: Behold, you know my days, my daily actions do not escape you, you have set my sins before your eyes; "and so my substance is as nothing before you." For what is man that you are mindful of him? "Man has become like vanity"; man is in sin, and, if he has something of uprightness and virtue, he is rightly preferred to the other earthly living things and excels in the sight of the animals over which he is set; but in God's sight his substance is as nothing. Hence too elsewhere he says: "For no man living will be justified in your sight"; which Symmachus expressed more plainly, saying: "And my life is as nothing before you."

Explanation 38, chapter 21

38.21.1CSEL 64:200

Sunt autem qui breues putant dies dictos, quia Symmachus σπιθαμάς posuit. σπιθαμή autem palmus est et quia palmo mensus dicitur deus caelum - palma autem uel palmus portio manus est metientis et aliquid comprehendentis —, ideo tamquam breues dies aestimant nuncupatos, cum cognitio dei per mensuram, ut supra diximus, possit intellegi, caelestis autem ista cognitio, ut ad mensuram facta sint omnia. non ergo breues, sed magni dies prophetae possunt intellegi quos deus mensus est palmo, quo mensus est caelum.

But there are those who think the days are called short, because Symmachus put "spans." A span is a palm's breadth; and because God is said to have measured heaven with his span (and a palm or span is a portion of the hand that measures and grasps something), they therefore think the days are called short; whereas the knowledge of God can be understood through measure, as we said above, and this is heavenly knowledge, that all things were made to measure. Not short, then, but great days of the prophet can be understood, which God measured with the span with which he measured heaven.

38.21.2CSEL 64:200

neque enim breues suae uitae diceret qui postea ait: heu me quia incolatus meus prolongatus est, nisi forte quia propter peccata hominum breuiores uitae istius dies fecit, quae ante et nongentis et septingentis annis extendebatur, ut nunc intra centum annorum curricula claudatur. sic ergo intellegendum: ecce peccato obnoxios dies meos nosti; dies enim uitae huius quae peccato est obnoxia breues sunt, dies autem uitae aeternae sine fine.

For he would not call the days of his life short who afterwards said: "Woe is me, that my sojourning is prolonged!" unless perhaps because, on account of men's sins, he made the days of this life shorter, which before extended to nine hundred and seven hundred years, so that now it is enclosed within a course of a hundred years. So it must be understood thus: behold, you know my days liable to sin; for the days of this life, which is liable to sin, are short, but the days of eternal life without end.

Explanation 38, chapter 22

38.22.1CSEL 64:200

Aut certe sic — nostrum est enim argumentis quaerere ueritatem, tuum est eligere quid sequaris —: ne peccatum, inquit, cresceret, adbreuiasti dies uitae humanae qua uiuimus in his terris, et tamen, cum maturior in hoc breui cursu istius uitae finis sit peccatorum mortis celeritate, substantia mea tamquam nihil ante te, quia, etsi ad imaginem et similitudinem dei facti sumus, grauat nos tamen in hoc corpore constitutos quaedam terrena contagio, quae non grauaret, si nos exuere magis ueterem hominem, cum induimus gratiam, quam superuestire mallemus;

Or certainly thus (for it is ours to seek truth by arguments, yours to choose what to follow): lest sin increase, he says, you have shortened the days of human life by which we live on this earth; and yet, though in this short course of this life the end of sins comes sooner by the swiftness of death, my substance is as nothing before you, because, although we were made after the image and likeness of God, yet a certain earthly contagion weighs on us set in this body, which would not weigh on us if we chose rather to put off the old man when we put on grace than to be clothed over;

38.22.2CSEL 64:200–201

minorem enim laborem nobis expoliatus homo uetus quam superuestitus afferret. nam quod expoliamus, abicimus, quod superuestimus, includimus et ideo ingemescimus et laboramus, donec mortale hoc ueteris hominis indumentum errori effectum obnoxium nouitate suae uitae spiritalis absorbeatur, ut, si supra uenenum plurima mella fundantur, aegre ac nimis sero ueneni uirus aboletur, aqua etiam multa diu cum ueneni felle luctatur, si non illud expuat, sed absorbeat. ideo laboriosa paenitentia, suauis gratia, quia peccatum expoliatur ubi gratia est, absorbetur ubi paenitentia; ibi remittitur, hic absconditur, et ideo scriptum est: beati quorum remissae sunt iniquitates et quorum tecta sunt peccata.

for the old man stripped off would bring us less labor than one clothed over. For what we strip off we cast away; what we put on over we enclose; and so we groan and labor until this mortal garment of the old man, made liable to error, is swallowed up by the newness of its spiritual life; as, if much honey is poured over poison, the poison's venom is abolished with difficulty and too late, and much water too struggles long with the gall of poison, if one does not spit it out but swallows it. So penance is laborious, grace sweet, because sin is stripped off where grace is, swallowed up where penance is; there it is remitted, here hidden; and so it is written: "Blessed are those whose iniquities are remitted and whose sins are covered."

Explanation 38, chapter 23

38.23.1CSEL 64:201

Et requieuit paulisper, ingemescens humanae condicionis aerumnam, quia dixerat: uerumtamen uniuersa uanitas, omnis homo uiuens, et post diapsalma resumpto spiritu ait: quamquam in imagine dei ambulet homo, tamen uane conturbabitur; thesaurizat, et ignorat cui congregat ea. uide quomodo ante asperitatem suae sententiae temperauit, postea rationem suae uocis absoluit. temperauit dicendo, quia in imagine dei ambulat homo.

And he rested a little, groaning over the hardship of the human condition, because he had said: "Yet all things are vanity, every man living"; and after the pause, taking up his breath again, he says: "Although man walks in the image of God, yet he is troubled in vain; he heaps up treasure, and does not know for whom he gathers it." See how he first tempered the harshness of his sentence, and afterwards set out the reason of his word. He tempered it by saying that man walks in the image of God.

38.23.2CSEL 64:201–202

beatus homo, qui ad similitudinem dei per fidem ambulas; beatus quia in te fidem habes, beatior si auaritiam non haberes. aliud bonum mentis aeternum, aliud uanum carnalis cupiditatis incendium; fides enim deo militat, auaritia temptatori; ista congerit quod sibi prosit, illa quod proficiat alienis. quid igitur tam uanum quam nescire cui laboret heredi? quis enim scit, si aut filius aut nepos proprius superuiuat? saepe aut in tabulis testamenti scriptus heres funesto obitu testatorem praecedit ad tumulum aut heredi-

Blessed are you, man, who walk by faith after the likeness of God; blessed because you have faith in you, more blessed if you had no avarice. One is the eternal good of the mind, another the vain fire of fleshly desire; for faith serves God, avarice the tempter; the one heaps up what profits itself, the other what profits others. What, then, is so vain as not to know for what heir one labors? For who knows whether his son or his own grandson will survive? Often either the heir written in the tablets of the will precedes the testator to the tomb by a deadly death, or the survivor swallows the inheritance,

38.23.3CSEL 64:202

tatem superstes absorbet aut luxuriosus dissipat aut stultissimus non tuetur aut proscriptus amittit. si quem ergo uideris studiose diuitias congregantem, dices tu: uane conturbatur; thesaurizat, et ignorat cui congregat ea. neque enim secum potest auferre quae possidet et, cum morietur, relinquet alienis diuitias suas. succedit frequenter inimicus et ingratus et decessori successor insultat; quos ille dilexit iste persequitur, quos ille nutriuit hic uendit.

or the luxurious man dissipates it, or the very foolish does not look after it, or the proscribed loses it. If, then, you see someone eagerly gathering riches, you will say: "He is troubled in vain; he heaps up treasure and does not know for whom he gathers it." For he cannot take with him what he possesses, and when he dies he will leave his riches to others. Often an enemy and ungrateful man succeeds, and the successor insults his predecessor; those whom he loved this one persecutes, those whom he nourished this one sells.

Explanation 38, chapter 24

38.24.1CSEL 64:202

Graecus tamen non habet: in imagine dei, sed tantummodo: in imagine. in qua ergo imagine ambulat homo? in ea utique ambulat ad cuius similitudinem factus est, id est ad imaginem dei; imago autem dei Christus, qui est splendor gloriae et imago substantiae eius. Christus ergo imago sancti. ad imaginem haec imago uenit in terras, ut iam non in umbra ambularemus, sed in imagine;

The Greek, however, does not have "in the image of God," but only "in the image." In what image, then, does man walk? Surely in that after whose likeness he was made, that is, after the image of God; and the image of God is Christ, who is the brightness of his glory and the image of his substance. Christ, then, is the image of the saint. After the image this Image came to earth, so that we might no longer walk in shadow but in the image;

38.24.2CSEL 64:202

in Christo enim ambulat qui sequitur euangelium. ideo discipulo suo dicit: uade retro post me, ut me sequaris. ideo errauit populus Iudaeorum, quia in umbra ambulauit; ideo non errat populus christianus, quia in imagine ambulat, habens solem sibi iustitiae refulgentem. bona imago non ceris picturae figurata radiantis, sed plenitudine diuinitatis expressa.

for he walks in Christ who follows the gospel. So he says to his disciple: "Get behind me," so that you may follow me. So the Jewish people erred, because it walked in shadow; so the Christian people does not err, because it walks in the image, having the sun of justice shining for it. Good is the image, not formed in the wax of a gleaming picture, but expressed by the fullness of the Godhead.

38.24.3CSEL 64:202–203

in qua imagine et pater simul uidetur et filius, quia utriusque eorum unitas operationis effulget. etsi iam resurrexerit Christus, tamen in euangelio nobis adhuc eius imago monstratur. lego quod Lazarum suscitauerit, et patris opus et filii credo. filius uocauit, pater audiuit, Lazarus ambulauit. lego quia eum daemones fatebantur; et patrem, qui dei filium precabantur, fatebantur et in ipso uel per ipsum eiciebantur, (ut) scriptum est: quodsi in spiritu dei eicio daemonia, filii uestri in quo eiciunt?

In this image both Father and Son are seen together, because the unity of operation of both shines forth. Although Christ has already risen, yet in the gospel his image is still shown us. I read that he raised Lazarus, and I believe it the work of Father and Son. The Son called, the Father heard, Lazarus walked. I read that the demons confessed him; they confessed the Father too, who besought the Son of God, and they were cast out in him or through him, as it is written: "But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, by whom do your sons cast them out?"

Explanation 38, chapter 25

38.25.1CSEL 64:203

Primum igitur umbra praecessit, secuta est imago, erit ueritas; umbra in lege, imago uero in euangelio, ueritas in caelestibus. umbra euangelii et ecclesiae congregationis in lege, imago futurae ueritatis in euangelio, ueritas in iudicio dei; ergo quae nunc celebrantur in ecclesia, eorum umbra erat in sermonibus prophetarum, umbra in diluuio, umbra in Rubro Mari, quando baptizati sunt patres nostri in nube et in mari, umbra in petra quae aquam fluxit et populum sequebatur.

First, then, the shadow went before, the image followed, the truth will be: the shadow in the law, the image in the gospel, the truth in heavenly things. The shadow of the gospel and of the congregation of the church was in the law; the image of the future truth in the gospel; the truth in the judgment of God. So the things now celebrated in the church had their shadow in the words of the prophets; a shadow in the flood, a shadow in the Red Sea, when our fathers were baptized in the cloud and in the sea; a shadow in the rock that flowed with water and followed the people.

38.25.2CSEL 64:203

nonne illud in umbra erat sacrosancti huius mysterii sacramentum? nonne in umbra erat aqua de petra quasi sanguis de Christo, qui fugientes se populos sequebatur, ut biberent et non sitirent, redimerentur et non perirent? sed iam discessit umbra noctis et caliginis Iudaeorum, dies appropinquauit ecclesiae. uidemus nunc per imaginem bona et tenemus imaginis bona. uidimus principem sacerdotum ad nos uenientem, uidimus et audiuimus offerentem pro nobis sanguinem suum.

Was not the sacrament of this most sacred mystery in shadow? Was not the water from the rock in shadow, as the blood from Christ, which followed the peoples fleeing it, so that they might drink and not thirst, be redeemed and not perish? But now the shadow of the night and gloom of the Jews has departed; the day of the church has drawn near. We now see good things through the image and hold the good things of the image. We have seen the chief of priests coming to us; we have seen and heard him offering his blood for us.

38.25.3CSEL 64:203–204

sequimur ut possumus sacerdotes; ut offeramus pro populo sacrificium etsi infirmi merito, tamen honorabiles sacrificio, quia, etsi nunc Christus non uidetur offerre, tamen ipse offertur in terris, quia Christi corpus offertur, immo ipse offerre manifestatur in nobis, cuius sermo sanctificat sacrificium quod offertur. et ipse quidem nobis apud patrem aduocatus adsistit, sed nunc eum non uidemus; tunc uidebimus, cum imago transierit, ueritas uenerit. tunc iam non per speculum, sed facie ad faciem ea quae sunt perfecta uidebuntur.

We priests follow as we can, so as to offer sacrifice for the people, though weak in merit, yet honorable by the sacrifice; because, although Christ is not now seen to offer, yet he himself is offered on earth, because the body of Christ is offered; rather he himself is shown to offer in us, whose word sanctifies the sacrifice that is offered. And he himself indeed stands by us as advocate with the Father, but now we do not see him; then we shall see him, when the image has passed and the truth has come. Then no longer through a mirror, but face to face, the things that are perfect will be seen.

Explanation 38, chapter 26

38.26.1CSEL 64:204

Ascende ergo, homo, in caelum et uidebis illa, quorum umbra hic erat uel imago; uidebis non ex parte, non in aenigmate, sed in consummatione, non in uelamine, sed in luce. uidebis uerum lumen, aeternum atque perpetuum sacerdotem, cuius hic imagines uidebas Petrum Paulum Iohannem Iacobum Matthaeum Thomam. uidebis perfectum hominem iam non in imagine, sed in ueritate; qualis enim caelestis, tales et caelestes, utique et ipsi iam in gloria uel decore, iam in resurrectionis gratia, non in corpore mortis et corruptionis deformitate.

Ascend, then, O man, into heaven, and you will see those things whose shadow or image was here; you will see not in part, not in a riddle, but in completion, not under a veil but in light. You will see the true light, the eternal and perpetual priest, whose images you saw here: Peter, Paul, John, James, Matthew, Thomas. You will see the perfect man no longer in image but in truth; for as is the heavenly, such are the heavenly, they too already in glory or beauty, already in the grace of resurrection, not in the body of death and the deformity of corruption.

Explanation 38, chapter 27

38.27.1CSEL 64:204

Uide ne eo deferas imaginem terrestris, ubi lux caelestium est. hic si quis tyranni imagines habeat, qui iam uictus interiit, iure damnatur. quomodo tu hostis et aduersarii imaginem in ciuitatem ueri imperatoris inducis, nisi ut ipse te damnet? et si uolueris imaginem terrestris inferre, contradicet tibi princeps istius mundi; dicet: mea est imago haec et quae offers mea sunt. quid facies deprehensus, cum tibi dixerit: mea est auaritia, mea est ambitio, meae diuitiae, quarum imaginem in te recognosco?

See that you do not carry the image of the earthly where the light of the heavenly is. Here, if anyone has images of a tyrant who has been defeated and perished, he is rightly condemned. How do you bring the image of the enemy and adversary into the city of the true emperor, except so that he condemn you? And if you wish to bring in the image of the earthly, the prince of this world will contradict you; he will say: "This image is mine, and what you offer is mine." What will you do, caught, when he says to you: "Avarice is mine, ambition is mine, mine are the riches whose image I recognize in you"?

38.27.2CSEL 64:204–205

ipse est enim aduersarius et defensor. quodsi fueris qualis Iacob, dices Labae qui se transfigurat in angelum lucis: recognosce si quid tuorum in me inueni. tunc ille requiret et non inueniens confutatus abscedet, quia abscondisti atque obliterasti omnia simulacra uitiorum. beatus qui potest dicere: ueniet huius mundi princeps et in me suum inueniet nihil. quae sua sunt enim quaerit ille, non ista quae Christi. si ergo Christum sequeris, noli quas non habeas affectare diuitias, augere quas habeas, sed diuitem te sibi sentiat pauper.

For he is both adversary and defender. But if you are such as Jacob, you will say to the Laban who transforms himself into an angel of light: "Recognize if you have found anything of yours with me." Then he will search and, finding nothing, go away confounded, because you have hidden and blotted out all the idols of vices. Blessed is he who can say: "The prince of this world will come and will find nothing of his in me." For he seeks what is his, not what is Christ's. If, then, you follow Christ, do not strive for riches you do not have, nor increase those you have; but let the poor man feel you rich for him.

38.27.3CSEL 64:205

induc in domum tuam inopem, frange panem esurienti et nudum operi, ut tibi thesaurus condatur in caelo qui tecum transeat. pauper Christus est factus, cum diues esset, ut nos sua inopia diuites faceret. noli ergo propter diuitias uane conturbari, excitari de somno, cogitare quemadmodum pecuniam tuam serues, opes tuas augeas, de nocte procedere, excubare ad iudicis domum, ut aliena diripias, litem moueas pauperi, uerearis exactorem tributi. uana est ista conturbatio.

Bring the needy into your house, break bread for the hungry and cover the naked, so that a treasure may be laid up for you in heaven which may pass with you. Christ became poor, though he was rich, so as to make us rich by his poverty. Do not, then, be troubled in vain on account of riches, roused from sleep, thinking how to keep your money, how to increase your wealth, setting out by night, keeping watch at the judge's house to plunder others' goods, bringing a lawsuit against a poor man, fearing the tax-collector. Vain is that disturbance.

Explanation 38, chapter 28

38.28.1CSEL 64:205

Et ideo iustus dixit: et nunc quae est expectatio mea? nonne dominus? et substantia mea ante te est. spes et patientia nostra Christus est, ipse factus est redemptio nostra, ipse est nostra expectatio, ut dicamus singuli: expectans expectaui dominum et respexit me. respice ergo nos in iudicio tuo, respiciat super nos misericordia tua, ut qui de merito diffidimus nostro per tuam misericordiam liberemur cuius potestate est animae nostrae uitaeque substantia. et ideo non timeamus corporis mortem, sed eum qui potest animam nostram uel seruare uel perdere, cuius substantia uirtus est, quam deus ad similitudinem sui pectoribus infudit humanis.

And so the just man said: "And now what is my expectation? Is it not the Lord? And my substance is before you." Our hope and patience is Christ; he has become our redemption, he is our expectation, so that each of us may say: "Waiting, I waited for the Lord, and he looked upon me." Look, then, on us in your judgment, let your mercy look upon us, so that we who distrust our own merit may be freed through your mercy, in whose power is the substance of our soul and life. And so let us not fear the death of the body, but him who can either save or destroy our soul, whose substance is virtue, which God poured into human hearts after his own likeness.

Explanation 38, chapter 29

38.29.1CSEL 64:205–206

Quisquis igitur habet istam substantiam animae suae, dicit: ab omnibus iniquitatibus meis eripe me. non unius criminis lapsum fatetur qui ab omnibus se iniquitatibus solui precatur. scit enim quod, nisi dominus ignoscat, nemo saluus esse possit quicumque natus est sub peccato, quem ipsa noxiae condicionis hereditas adstrinxit ad culpam.

Whoever, then, has this substance of his soul says: "Rescue me from all my iniquities." He does not confess the fall of one crime who prays to be loosed from all iniquities. For he knows that, unless the Lord forgives, no one can be saved who was born under sin, whom the very inheritance of a guilty condition has bound to guilt.

Explanation 38, chapter 30

38.30.1CSEL 64:206

Obprobrium, inquit, insipienti dedisti me. quis est insipiens nisi qui peccatum facit et eligit mala pro bonis? ergo, qui auctor est peccatorum, ipse insipiens magis quam eius minister.

"You have given me," he says, "as a reproach to the fool." Who is the fool but he who commits sin and chooses evil for good? So he who is the author of sins is himself more a fool than his minister.

38.30.2CSEL 64:206

cum peccamus igitur, in obprobrium tradimur aduersario, ut ille nos quasi inimicus in die iudicii accuset et prodat. suscipiamus ergo obprobrium crucis Christi, quod suscepit Moyses et Aegypti thesauris regalibus praetulit et ideo non est insipienti in obprobrium traditus. alii habent codices: obprobrium insipienti ne tradas me. sed magis Dauid eam consuetudinem habet, ut sua magis obprobria et peccata fateatur nec de peccatis suis erubescat et obprobriis, qui scit in confessione esse ueniam et in peccati sui condemnatione iustitiam.

When we sin, then, we are handed over as a reproach to the adversary, so that he, as an enemy, may accuse and betray us on the day of judgment. Let us take up, then, the reproach of Christ's cross, which Moses took up and preferred to the royal treasures of Egypt; and so he was not handed over as a reproach to the fool. Other manuscripts have: "Do not give me as a reproach to the fool." But David rather has this habit, that he confesses his own reproaches and sins and does not blush at his sins and reproaches, for he knows that in confession is pardon and in condemnation of one's sin is justice.

Explanation 38, chapter 31

38.31.1CSEL 64:206

Denique ex his quae secuntur manifestatur hic sensus, quia subiecit: ommutui et non aperui os meum, quoniam tu fecisti me, hoc est: dedisti me tu obprobrium insipienti; ideo ommutui et non aperui os meum, ne peccata maiora contraherem. agnoui uoluntatem tuam, ut ad tempus erubescerem et postea saluus fierem ueniam postulando. prodest ergo interdum et obprobrium, siquidem etiam ipse prodest carnis interitus, ut testificatur apostolus dicens: tradidi eum in interitum

Indeed from what follows this sense is made plain, for he added: "I was dumb and did not open my mouth, because you made me"; that is: you gave me as a reproach to the fool; so I was dumb and did not open my mouth, lest I contract greater sins. I recognized your will, that I should blush for a time and afterwards be saved by asking pardon. Reproach, then, sometimes profits, since even the destruction of the flesh profits, as the apostle testifies, saying: "I have handed him over to the destruction

38.31.2CSEL 64:206–207

carnis, ut spiritus saluus sit in die domini nostri Iesu Christi. obprobrium quoque prodesse Dauid ipse testatus est dicens ad Abessam: sine maledicat mihi Iemineus, quoniam dixit illi dominus, ut uideat humilitatem meam et retribuat mihi dominus bona pro maledicto hoc. et re uera uidit obprobrium eius dominus, quod flens ibat et excalciatus operto capite, et amouit eius obprobrium. liquet igitur quia, cum datus in obprobrium fugerit et humiliatus sit et nudis pedibus domino satisfecerit et lapides iacientem non repercusserit et in maledicentem non permiserit uindicari et post haec regno suo integro resumptus sit, quia et obprobrium a domino sit et prosit magis sustinere obprobrium quam repellere. denique uictoria post secuta est.

of the flesh, so that the spirit may be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ." That reproach profits, David himself testified, saying to Abishai: "Let the Benjaminite curse me, for the Lord has told him, that he may see my humiliation and the Lord repay me good for this cursing." And indeed the Lord saw his reproach, that he went weeping, barefoot, with covered head, and took away his reproach. It is clear, then, that since, given as a reproach, he fled and was humbled and made satisfaction to the Lord with bare feet and did not strike back at the one throwing stones and did not allow vengeance on the curser, and after this was restored to his kingdom intact, the reproach was from the Lord and it profits more to bear reproach than to repel it. Indeed victory followed afterwards.

38.31.3CSEL 64:207

ergo obprobrium prodest. sed quid est quod addidit: quoniam tu fecisti me? nonne ideo ommutuisse se dicit et non aperuisse os suum, quia agnouit domini uoluntatem, et propterea patienter se pertulisse, ut satisfieret domino per obprobrium pro peccato?

Reproach, then, profits. But what is it that he added: "because you made me"? Does he not say he was dumb and did not open his mouth because he recognized the Lord's will, and therefore bore patiently, so as to make satisfaction to the Lord for sin through reproach?

Explanation 38, chapter 32

38.32.1CSEL 64:207

Unde et adiunxit: amoue a me plagas meas. quomodo hoc sibi congruit? in superiore psalmo flagellis se optulit, hic flagella a se postulat amoueri, nisi quia soluit iam de manu domini duplicia peccata sua erubescendo, obprobria sustinendo. conpunctiones cordis sui sunt et cogitationum, sunt et increpationum flagella. uideamus tamen ne ideo dixerit ante deum esse substantiam animae suae, quia non inpugnaret aduersarius eam, nisi potestatem accepisset a domino; quod enim fecit dominus, et tuetur.

Hence he also added: "Remove your blows from me." How does this agree with itself? In the previous psalm he offered himself to the scourges; here he asks that the scourges be removed from him, unless because he has already paid double for his sins from the Lord's hand by blushing, by bearing reproaches. There are compunctions of his heart and thoughts, and there are scourges of rebukes. Let us see, though, whether he did not say that the substance of his soul is before God for this reason: that the adversary would not attack it unless he had received power from the Lord; for what the Lord made, he also protects.

38.32.2CSEL 64:207

denique angelus in circuitu est hominis, qui praetendat, ne quis noceat ei. non discedit angelus nisi iussus a domino, ut suus athleta decertet. ergo quasi substantia domini praesumit ueniam sibi iniquitatum suarum a conditore suo posse concedi et ideo rogat, quia nouit auctorem suum misericordem.

Indeed an angel is around a man, to stand guard lest anyone harm him. The angel does not depart unless commanded by the Lord, so that his athlete may contend. So, as the Lord's substance, he presumes that pardon of his iniquities can be granted him by his maker, and so he asks, because he knows his author is merciful.

38.32.3CSEL 64:207

deinde, quia datus sit in obprobrium, non resistit, sed patitur aduersum se assistere peccatorem et silet substantiae suae conscientia, quae bona est, et potest corporis ferocitatem refrenare, ut uirtus succedat, culpa ponatur. postremo, quia factus a domino est, citius sibi posse donari peccatum confidenter aestimat, qui fortitudinem manus domini potuerit sustinere.

Then, because he has been given as a reproach, he does not resist, but allows the sinner to stand against him, and the conscience of his substance, which is good, is silent and can rein in the body's ferocity, so that virtue may succeed and guilt be laid down. Lastly, because he was made by the Lord, he confidently reckons that sin can be forgiven him the sooner, who has been able to bear the strength of the Lord's hand.

Explanation 38, chapter 33

38.33.1CSEL 64:207–208

Et hoc utique bonae substantiae est, etsi fortitudine manus domini defecisse se dicit. fortis manus sicut male percutit, sic cito sanat; quae fortis ad uulnus, fortis et ad remedium est. unde et ipse ait: percutiam et sanabo, ut non meminerit uulneris qui sanatus euasit. denique haec manus domini sancto Iob omnia

And this surely belongs to a good substance, even though he says he failed from the strength of the Lord's hand. A strong hand, as it strikes hard, so it soon heals; that which is strong for the wound is strong also for the remedy. Hence he himself says: "I will strike and I will heal," so that he who has escaped healed does not remember the wound. Indeed this hand of the Lord took away everything from holy Job

38.33.2CSEL 64:208

abstulit et omnia repraesentauit, immo omnia cumulo auxit, ut amissa geminaret. nec te moueat quod defecisse se dixit. est qui deficit et fortior surgit; suffulcit enim dominus omnes qui ruunt et corrigit omnes elisos; cum uirtute enim surgit quicumque corrigitur. defecit Paulus a fortitudine manus huius; cecidit persecutor et surrexit euangelii praedicator. hoc est quod ait: a fortitudine manus tuae ego defeci.

and restored everything, rather increased everything in abundance, so as to double what was lost. And do not be troubled that he said he failed. There is one who fails and rises stronger; for the Lord upholds all who fall and raises up all who are thrown down; for whoever is raised up rises with strength. Paul failed from the strength of this hand; the persecutor fell and the preacher of the gospel rose. This is what he says: "From the strength of your hand I have failed."

Explanation 38, chapter 34

38.34.1CSEL 64:208

Et addidit: in increpationibus super iniquitatem erudisti hominem et tabescere fecisti sicut araneam animam eius. Graecus ὑπὲρ ἀνομίας dixit, hoc est pro iniquitate et integrum uersum κατὰ κοινοῦ posuit, quod est: in increpationibus pro iniquitate erudisti hominem. ideo Sapiens dixit: quis mihi dabit cogitationum mearum flagella et labiorum meorum signaculum?, ut cor suum ipse suis cogitationibus flagellaret et signaret labia sua, quo et uetera peccata

And he added: "With rebukes for iniquity you have instructed man, and you have made his soul waste away like a spider." The Greek said ὑπὲρ ἀνομίας, that is, "for iniquity," and put the whole verse in common construction, which is: "With rebukes for iniquity you have instructed man." So the Wise Man said: "Who will give me scourges for my thoughts and a seal for my lips?", so that he might scourge his heart with his own thoughts and seal his lips, so as both to lessen old sins

38.34.2CSEL 64:208–209

minueret nec alia loquendo renouaret, quo propriis increpationibus eruditus exercitia uirtutis indueret. tabescit autem anima; quando peccatum minuitur, uel cum anima tabescit, culpa deponitur; incrassatur, cum peccata cumulantur. unde ait dominus de peccatoribus: non permanebit in his spiritus meus aeternum, quoniam carnes sunt, et alibi scriptura dicit: incrassatum est cor populi huius. ideo et Hieremias primum baculum uidit nucinum, deinde ollam feruentem, ut tabesceret anima prophetae incipientis, quo culpa decederet, ut accederet gratia.

and not renew others by speaking, so that, instructed by his own rebukes, he might put on the exercises of virtue. And the soul wastes away when sin is lessened; or, when the soul wastes away, guilt is laid down; it grows fat when sins are heaped up. Hence the Lord says of sinners: "My spirit will not remain in them for ever, because they are flesh"; and elsewhere Scripture says: "The heart of this people has grown fat." So Jeremiah too saw first a rod of almond, then a boiling pot, so that the soul of the beginning prophet might waste away, that guilt might depart and grace come in.

38.34.3CSEL 64:209

sed cur prius baculum, postea ollam? quoniam qui baculo non corrigitur in ollam mittitur, ut ardeat et tabescat. et ideo et ad prophetam Hiezechiel dicitur: accipe tibi sartaginem et accipies iniquitates domus Israel et consummabis; et tabescent, inquit, in suis iniquitatibus, et alibi in eodem libro dicit dominus: sed ego magnum faciam titionem et multiplicabo ligna et succendam ignem, ut liquefiat caro et imminuatur ius.

But why first the rod, afterwards the pot? Because he who is not corrected by the rod is put into the pot, to burn and waste away. And so to the prophet Ezekiel too it is said: "Take for yourself a pan, and you will receive the iniquities of the house of Israel and complete them; and they will waste away," he says, "in their iniquities"; and elsewhere in the same book the Lord says: "But I will make the firebrand great and multiply the wood and kindle the fire, so that the flesh may melt and the broth be lessened."

38.34.4CSEL 64:209

quibus testimoniis significatur, quod animae perfidorum admoto igne tabescant, ut deponant crassitudinis quendam carnalis humorem. mittuntur ergo in sartaginem et animae peccatorum, ut defluat quaedam peccati caro, quae obduxerat animae ac mentis uigorem et uelut iure quodam ita quibusdam infuderat animam inlecebris cupiditatum. expectant igitur nos quaedam sartagines. ideo hic conteramus cor nostrum, ut subtile fiat et deponat omnem duritiam et pinguedinem quandam carnalis aruinae.

By these testimonies it is signified that the souls of the faithless waste away when fire is applied, so as to lay down a kind of fluid of carnal fatness. So the souls of sinners too are put into a pan, so that a certain flesh of sin may run off, which had covered the vigor of soul and mind and had, as it were, steeped the soul in the enticements of desires. Certain pans, then, await us. So let us crush our heart here, so that it becomes fine and lays down all hardness and a kind of fatness of carnal lard.

38.34.5CSEL 64:209–210

quod patientur qui luxuriati sunt in hac uita et ludibria dedecorum quam opera ulla uirtutum exercenda sibi more Iudaico crediderunt. incrassatus est enim Iacob et pinguis factus est et surrexit ludere, quem a fidei ueritate lusus ille in perfidiae traduxit errorem. merito ergo Paulus castigabat corpus suum, ne nutriret carnes peccati; luxuriando enim facimus membra peccati, sobrietate autem membra iustitiae. non natura ergo, sed culpa delinquit.

This those will suffer who have lived in luxury in this life and believed, in the Jewish manner, that they should practice the mockeries of disgrace rather than any works of virtue. For Jacob grew fat and became thick and rose up to play, whom that play led from the truth of faith into the error of faithlessness. Rightly, then, Paul chastised his body, lest he nourish the flesh of sin; for by luxury we make members of sin, but by sobriety members of justice. It is not nature, then, but guilt that offends.

Explanation 38, chapter 35

38.35.1CSEL 64:210

Nec iterum uana et inania sequamur, ne telam araneae texere iudicemur, eo quod peccata nullam perpetuitatis possunt habere substantiam. unde cum uideris aliquos studere facultatibus ampliandis, cumulandis potestatibus, affectando decori, dices illud Esaiae: telam araneae texunt isti in omnibus diei unius, quae diuturna esse non potest, sed cito diuiditur atque opus eius omne dissoluitur; non enim supra solidum aliquod firmamentum locatur, sed in uacuo suspenditur. nihil laxum, nihil molle uerum Christi militem decet; ecce enim qui mollibus uestiuntur in domibus regum sunt.

Nor again let us follow vain and empty things, lest we be judged to weave a spider's web, because sins can have no substance of permanence. Hence, when you see some eager to enlarge their means, heap up powers, seek after beauty, you will say that saying of Isaiah: "These weave a spider's web" in everything of a single day, which cannot last but is soon torn and all its work dissolved; for it is not set on any solid foundation but hung in the void. Nothing slack, nothing soft befits the true soldier of Christ; for behold, those who are clothed in soft garments are in kings' houses.

38.35.2CSEL 64:210

arguti sibi et industrii omnes auari uidentur. quid argutius, quid sollicitius aranea, quae operi suo diebus ac noctibus semper intendit nec ullo sumptu ullaque inpensa conficit uestimentum? sed uanum est omne quod fecerit. sic homo omnis est qui opus suum supra Christi non constituit fundamentum; uane noctibus et diebus et ipse turbatur, cum eum plerumque araneae modo etiam in ipso suae improbitatis molimine operis sui ruina conuoluat.

All the greedy seem to themselves shrewd and industrious. What is shrewder, what more careful than the spider, which always attends to its work day and night and makes its garment with no cost or expense? But all it has made is vain. So is every man who does not set his work on the foundation of Christ; he too is troubled in vain nights and days, since often, like the spider, in the very effort of his wickedness the ruin of his work entangles him.

Explanation 38, chapter 36

38.36.1CSEL 64:210

Et ideo sapiens, qui cognoscit huius saeculi uanitatem, non diuturnam uitae huius precatur usuram, sed ad illa aeterna festinat et labore huius corporis et dolore gestit absolui, sicut propheta desiderasse cognoscitur dicens: exaudi, domine, orationem meam et deprecationem meam, auribus percipe lacrimas meas. ne sileas a me, quoniam ego aduena sum apud te in terra et peregrinus sicut omnes patres mei.

And so the wise man, who knows the vanity of this world, does not pray for a long use of this life, but hastens to those eternal things and longs to be freed from the labor and pain of this body, as the prophet is known to have desired, saying: "Hear, Lord, my prayer and my supplication; give ear to my tears. Do not be silent toward me, for I am a stranger with you on earth and a sojourner, as all my fathers were."

38.36.2CSEL 64:210–211

aliud est incola, aliud aduena, aliud accola: incola qui de loco est et genitalem locum incolit, aduena qui aliunde uenit, accola qui ad tempus colit et mutatur annorum uicibus. hoc est ergo quod dicit Dauid: apud te alienus sum, dum in terra sum; non sum nunc paradisi tui incola\\ unde exposuit hoc ipse subiciens: et peregrinus sicut omnes patres mei. quod aperuit et apostolus Paulus, asserens quoniam, cum sumus in corpore, peregrinamur a domino, quia, etsi fides in nobis est, per fidem tamen ambulamus, non per speciem, id est non facie ad faciem quasi praesentes; ambulamus enim in aenigmate adhuc, non in ueritate.

An inhabitant is one thing, a stranger another, a sojourner another: the inhabitant is he who is from the place and dwells in his place of birth; the stranger he who comes from elsewhere; the sojourner he who dwells for a time and moves with the turns of years. This, then, is what David says: I am a foreigner with you while I am on earth; I am not now an inhabitant of your paradise. Hence he himself explained it, adding: "and a sojourner, as all my fathers." The apostle Paul too made this plain, asserting that, while we are in the body, we are exiles from the Lord, because, though faith is in us, we walk by faith, not by sight, that is, not face to face as though present; for we still walk in a riddle, not in truth.

38.36.3CSEL 64:211

denique addidit: audemus ergo et confidimus magis peregrinari de corpore et adesse ad dominum. audemus praesumptionis in deo fidei, non temeritatis est uerbum, et confidimus id est: uolentes adquiescimus et optantes, non plenioris scientiae auctoritatem uelut principaliter nostro iudicio dependentes uolumus uerum esse quod cupimus, ut appropinquemus ad dominum, a quo nos uidetur futurorum et praesentium distantia separare. audemus ergo adesse, et ideo, inquit, conitimur. cognoscis uerbum uolentis adhuc peruenire, non eius qui peruenerit; affectus igitur in hoc sermone, non effectus ostenditur.

Then he added: "We are bold, then, and are confident rather to be exiled from the body and to be present with the Lord." "We are bold" is a word of the presumption of faith in God, not of rashness; and "we are confident," that is: willing we acquiesce and wishing, not depending as on our own judgment principally on the authority of fuller knowledge, we want what we desire to be true, that we may draw near to the Lord, from whom the distance of things future and present seems to separate us. We are bold, then, to be present, and so, he says, "we strive." You recognize the word of one still wishing to arrive, not of one who has arrived; desire, then, is shown in this word, not attainment.

38.36.4CSEL 64:211–212

denique ipsum affectum sui sermonis interroga, immo audi dicentem uel potius audi dubitantem, cum dicit: ideo conitimur siue absentes siue praesentes placere illi, absentes adhuc per fidem, praesentes per speciem. unde et hoc potest intellegi, quod et hic positi et illic placere et nostro iudici, redemptori quoque nostrarum desideramus animarum. necesse est enim nos ei assistere per speciem, ut unusquisque operum suorum merita dignae adipiscatur sortis examine, uel iustus in requie

Indeed question the desire of his very word, or rather hear him saying, or rather hear him doubting, when he says: "So we strive, whether absent or present, to please him": absent still by faith, present by sight. Hence this too can be understood: that both placed here and there we desire to please both our judge and the redeemer of our souls. For we must stand before him by sight, so that each may obtain the merits of his works by the examination of a worthy lot, either the just in rest

38.36.5CSEL 64:212

uel impius in aerumna. fundit igitur lacrimas, quoniam, cum aduena in terram uenerit, demoretur et separetur a patria longo detentus exilio. considera nunc mihi illum Adam de paradiso eiectum in castellum relegatum spectantem, unde deiectus sit, flentem ubertim, quia reminiscitur quid amiserit quoue deciderit. et ideo gratias agamus deo, qui nos perpetuo exilio liberauit, aperiens ianuam qua reuertamur ad patriam. unde apostolus praesumpsit dicere: ergo iam non estis aduenae atque peregrini, sed estis ciues sanctorum et domestici dei.

or the ungodly in misery. He sheds tears, then, because, when the stranger has come to earth, he lingers and is separated from his homeland, held in long exile. Consider now, I pray, that Adam, cast out of paradise, banished to a stronghold, looking toward the place from which he was cast down, weeping abundantly, because he remembers what he lost or whence he fell. And so let us give thanks to God, who has freed us from perpetual exile, opening a door by which we may return to our homeland. Hence the apostle dared to say: "So you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but fellow citizens of the saints and members of God's household."

Explanation 38, chapter 37

38.37.1CSEL 64:212

Hoc uolens recipere Dauid, antequam Christus ueniret in terras, dixit: remitte mihi ut refrigerem, priusquam eam, et amplius non ero, hoc est: hic mihi remitte ubi peccaui. nisi hic remiseris mihi, ibi remissionis requiem inuenire non potero; quod enim ligatum in terra manserit, ligatum manebit in caelo, quod solutum in terra fuerit, solutum erit in caelo. propheta enim et praedicator ecclesiae congregandae euangelico spiritu indulgentias domini praeuidebat et praecipienda apostolis

Wishing to receive this, David said, before Christ came to earth: "Remit to me, that I may be refreshed, before I go, and be no more"; that is: remit to me here where I sinned. Unless you remit to me here, I shall not be able to find there the rest of remission; for what remains bound on earth will remain bound in heaven; what is loosed on earth will be loosed in heaven. For the prophet and herald of the church to be gathered foresaw with the gospel spirit the Lord's pardons, and the Lord revealed to him what was to be commanded to the apostles;

38.37.2CSEL 64:212–213

ei dominus reuelabat, immo haec erat uetus sententia, ut qui se ligasset in terris uinctus migraret a corpore. ideo dominus, quod erat ante iudicii sui, dedit apostolis peccata remittendi aequitatem, soluenda ne diu ligata manerent. denique audi dicentem: tibi dabo claues regni caelorum, et quodcumque ligaueris super terram erit ligatum et in caelo, et quodcumque solueris super terram erit solutum et in caelo. tibi, inquit, dabo claues regni caelorum, ut et soluas et liges. hoc Nouatianus non audiuit, ecclesia dei audiuit; ideo ille in lapsu, nos in remissione, ille in inpaenitentia, nos in gratia. quod Petro dicitur, apostolis dicitur.

rather, this was the old sentence, that he who had bound himself on earth would depart from the body bound. So the Lord, what before belonged to his judgment, gave the apostles the equity of remitting sins, to be loosed lest they remain long bound. Indeed hear him saying: "To you I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound also in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed also in heaven." "To you," he says, "I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven," so that you may both loose and bind. This Novatian did not hear; the church of God heard it; so he is in a fall, we in remission; he in impenitence, we in grace. What is said to Peter is said to the apostles.

38.37.3CSEL 64:213

non potestatem usurpamus, sed seruimus imperio, ne postea, cum uenerit dominus et ligatos inuenerit quos oportuit solui, commoueatur aduersus dispensatorem, qui ligatos seruauerit seruos quos dominus iusserat solui dicens, quoniam qui cognouit uoluntatem domini sui et non fecit secundum uoluntatem eius, uapulabit multum; qui autem non cognouit et fecit digna plagis, uapulabit minus.

We do not usurp a power, but serve a command, lest afterwards, when the Lord comes and finds bound those who ought to have been loosed, he be moved against the steward who kept bound the servants whom the Lord had ordered to be loosed, saying that the servant who knew his master's will and did not act according to his will will be beaten much; but he who did not know and did what deserved blows will be beaten less.

Explanation 38, chapter 38

38.38.1CSEL 64:213

Merito ergo Dauid remitti sibi postulat, quod sciebat non esse his qui secundum Aaron erant sacerdotibus adtributum, sed euangelio seruabatur. cui ergo non remittitur in exilio est, in peregrinationis iniuria perseuerat. hic ergo petenda est uenia — hic enim dictum est: beati qui fletis, quia ridebitis —, hic locus est ueniae postulandae. deploremus igitur in terris, ut mereamur indulgentiam.

Rightly, then, David asks that remission be given him, which he knew had not been granted to the priests after Aaron but was reserved for the gospel. He, then, to whom there is no remission is in exile, persists in the injury of sojourning. Here, then, pardon must be asked (for here it is said: "Blessed are you who weep, for you will laugh"); here is the place for asking pardon. Let us lament, then, on earth, so that we may deserve indulgence.

38.38.2CSEL 64:213

nisi remissum peccatum hic fuerit, non habebimus requiem, si requies non fuerit, non erit uita aeterna, si uita aeterna non fuerit, non erimus. ideo petit remitti sibi, antequam eat, ut sit. si enim remissum non fuerit, non ero, inquit, cum his qui sunt, cum his qui in paradisum merentur ascendere. qui autem non est, consumetur cum descendentibus in lacum, qui in catenis et carcere fuerit derelictus.

Unless sin has been remitted here, we shall not have rest; if there is no rest, there will be no eternal life; if there is no eternal life, we shall not be. So he asks that it be remitted to him before he goes, so that he may be. For if it is not remitted, I shall not be, he says, with those who are, with those who deserve to ascend into paradise. And he who is not will be consumed with those who go down into the pit, who has been left in chains and prison.

Explanation 38, chapter 39

38.39.1CSEL 64:213–214

Non ergo definitiue dicit non ero, quia alibi dicit: psallam tibi in cithara, deus, sanctus Israel. gaudebunt labia mea cum cantauero tibi, et anima mea quam redemisti; de redemptione ergo praesumit. et alibi audi dicentem: placebo domino in regione uiuorum; erit ergo, qui placere praesumit. potest et sic intellegi, quia dixit: aduena ego sum apud te in terra et peregrinus sicut omnes patres mei et ideo remitte mihi, ut peregrinus esse desinam;

He does not, then, say definitively "I shall not be," because elsewhere he says: "I will sing psalms to you on the lyre, O God, Holy One of Israel. My lips will rejoice when I have sung to you, and my soul which you have redeemed"; he presumes, then, on redemption. And elsewhere hear him saying: "I will please the Lord in the land of the living"; he will be, then, who presumes to please. It can also be understood thus, because he said: "I am a stranger with you on earth and a sojourner, as all my fathers," and therefore: remit to me, so that I may cease to be a sojourner;

38.39.2CSEL 64:214

remitte mihi exilium quo relegatus sum. si remiseris, antequam discedam hinc, non ero amplius exul atque peregrinus; cum enim tu remiseris, non ero peregrinus, sed ciuis ero sanctorum tuorum, ero cum patribus meis qui et ipsi fuerunt ante peregrini, nunc uero iam ciues sunt. ero domesticus dei, ut poenam non timeam, gratiam merear per dominum nostrum Iesum, cum quo tibi est laus, honor, gloria, perpetuitas cum spiritu sancto a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

remit to me the exile to which I have been banished. If you remit it before I go from here, I shall no longer be an exile and a sojourner; for when you have remitted it, I shall not be a sojourner, but I shall be a citizen of your saints, I shall be with my fathers, who themselves were sojourners before but now are citizens. I shall be a member of God's household, so as not to fear punishment and to deserve grace through our Lord Jesus, with whom to you be praise, honor, glory, eternity, with the Holy Spirit, from the ages and now and always and for all the ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 39, chapter 1

39.1.1CSEL 64:214

In superioribus psalmis paenitentiam praedicauit, deinde de patientia sua et perturbatione hominis est locutus. in tricesimo autem et nono psalmo nouum adnuntiat testamentum; qui enim malorum paenitentiam agit expectat, sed non est perfecti expectare, sed expectasse; nemo enim, nisi qui perseuerauerit usque in finem, saluus erit.

In the preceding psalms he preached repentance; then he spoke of his own patience and of the distress of man. But in the thirty-ninth psalm he announces the New Testament. For one who does penance for evils is waiting; but it belongs to the perfect not to be waiting but to have waited; for no one will be saved except one who has persevered to the end.

Explanation 39, chapter 2

39.2.1CSEL 64:214–215

Ideo addidit: expectans expectaui dominum. ubi ergo recte hoc dicitur nisi in euangelio? in quo iam nobis qui expectabatur aduenit, in quo iam nobis non legis caligat umbra, sed ueritas fulget, quia Christus inluxit, qui exaudiuit deprecationem suorum et eduxit nos de lacu miseriae et de luto faecis, ubi iam demersi tenebamur nostrorum uoragine peccatorum et totus homo noster inhaerebat nec poterat sese animus noster eruere, obrutus multiplicis labe flagitii.

Therefore he added: “Waiting, I waited for the Lord.” Where, then, is this rightly said but in the gospel? In it the one who was awaited has now come to us; in it the shadow of the law no longer darkens us, but the truth shines, because Christ has shone forth, who heard the prayer of his own and brought us out of the pit of misery and out of the mire of the dregs, where we were held sunk in the whirlpool of our sins, and our whole man stuck fast, and our mind, overwhelmed by the stain of manifold wickedness, could not pull itself out.

39.2.2CSEL 64:215

gratias igitur domino Iesu unigenito dei filio redemptori nostro, qui nobis peccata omnia remissurus descendit e caelo, ut nos de lacu ac limo istius mundi et caenulenta quadam palude terrarum, de corpore quoque mortis huius eriperet atque in carne sua statueret animi nostri interiora uestigia, ut confirmati in dei uerbo et per crucem dominici corporis absoluti ambulemus iam non in obprobrio dedecoris, sed in remissione peccati.

Thanks, then, to the Lord Jesus, the only-begotten Son of God, our Redeemer, who came down from heaven to forgive us all our sins, to rescue us from the pit and the slime of this world and from a kind of muddy swamp of the earth, and also from the body of this death, and to set in his own flesh the inner footsteps of our mind, so that, made firm in the word of God and set free through the cross of the Lord’s body, we may walk no longer in the reproach of disgrace but in the forgiveness of sin.

39.2.3CSEL 64:215

confirmatus igitur et radicatus in Christo supra petram sibi memorat pedum suorum statuta uestigia. unde dicit apostolus: bibebant autem de consequenti petra, petra autem erat Christus. petra eo, quod sitientes sequatur, confirmet labentes, ne sitientibus aqua desit, labentibus firmamentum.

Made firm, then, and rooted in Christ, he recalls that the steps of his feet were set upon a rock. Hence the apostle says: “They drank from the rock that followed, and the rock was Christ.” A rock, in that it follows the thirsty and makes firm those who slip, so that the thirsty may not lack water nor those who slip a firm footing.

Explanation 39, chapter 3

39.3.1CSEL 64:215

Expectanti ergo mihi, domine Iesu, aliquando uenisti, direxisti gressus meos in euangelio, inmisisti in os meum canticum nouum quod est nouum testamentum. gaudentes iam canimus hymnum deo nostro, quia nouarum uirtutum praecepta cognouimus, ut nostra omnia relinquamus Christum sequentes et nostros diligamus inimicos. nouos etiam hausimus mores, ut pro persequentibus nos precem domino deferamus; maledicentes ecce benedicimus, nescimus opera nostra iactare aut celare peccata, angelorum etiam more nuptias refutamus.

To me, then, as I waited, Lord Jesus, you came at last; you directed my steps in the gospel; you put into my mouth a new song, which is the New Testament. Rejoicing, we now sing a hymn to our God, because we have come to know the precepts of new virtues: that we should leave all that is ours to follow Christ and should love our enemies. We have drunk in new ways of life too: that we should bring prayer to the Lord for those who persecute us. See, we bless those who curse; we do not know how to boast of our works or to hide our sins; after the manner of the angels we even decline marriage.

Explanation 39, chapter 4

39.4.1CSEL 64:215–216

Quid multa? de illo aerumnoso peccatore beatus homo factus est iam non respiciens in istius mundi uarias uanitates; uanitas enim uanitatum et omnia uanitas totus hic mundus est, sicut dixit sapiens Salomon. quid enim nisi uanum est ea sequi, quae perseuerare non possunt et omnia tamquam umbra praetereunt? insaniae autem falsae aut certamina ista bellorum, in quibus pro temporali possessione sanguis tantus est fusus, aut contentionum theatralium dissensiones aut circensium plena furoris studia declarantur aut haereticorum doctrina feralis aut pseudoprophetarum in modum oraculorum caelestium simulati gestus, uerba composita. sic enim dixit propheta: beatus uir cuius est nomen domini spes eius, et non respexit in uanitates et insanias falsas.

In short: from that wretched sinner a blessed man has been made, no longer looking to the varied vanities of this world; for this whole world is “vanity of vanities, and all is vanity”, as the wise Solomon said. For what is it but vain to pursue things that cannot last and all pass away like a shadow? And “false madnesses” is the name declared for these contests of wars, in which so much blood has been shed for a temporal possession, or the quarrels of the theatre’s contests, or the frenzied passions of the circus, or the deadly doctrine of heretics, or the feigned gestures and contrived words of false prophets in the manner of heavenly oracles. For so the prophet said: “Blessed is the man whose hope is the name of the Lord, and who has not looked to vanities and false madnesses.”

Explanation 39, chapter 5

39.5.1CSEL 64:216

Sunt ergo et uerae insaniae et forsitan prophetarum, qui in excessu mentis positi prophetabant repleti dei spiritu, ut quibusdam insanire uiderentur, cum propriae salutis immemores nudi plerumque et excalciati, sicut Esaias sanctus, per populos currerent, uociferantes non quae ipsi uellent, sed quae a domino iuberentur. ex his igitur intellegitur affluxisse remedium salutis, quoniam qui expectabatur adest.

There are, then, also true madnesses, perhaps those of the prophets, who prophesied in ecstasy, filled with the Spirit of God, so that to some they seemed to be mad, when, heedless of their own safety, often naked and barefoot like holy Isaiah, they ran among the peoples, crying out not what they themselves wished but what they were bidden by the Lord. From these things, then, it is understood that the remedy of salvation has flowed to us, since the one who was awaited is here.

Explanation 39, chapter 6

39.6.1CSEL 64:216

Expectauit eum Adam de paradiso eiectus, ut longo liberaretur exilio. expectauit eum in Noe iusto, qui ad semen futurorum est reseruatus, ut ex eo iustitiae semina in hominibus pullularent. ipsum putabat publicae salutis auctorem, qui diluuio superstes esse

Adam, cast out of paradise, awaited him, to be freed from long exile. He awaited him in righteous Noah, who was kept for the seed of those to come, so that from him the seeds of righteousness might spring up among men. He took Noah himself to be the author of the common salvation, since he had been found worthy to survive the flood,

39.6.2CSEL 64:216–217

meruisset, ipsum sapientiae principem, qui excoluisset uitem et eius fructu ebriatus foret — quid est enim uitis nisi sapientia? sicut aperuit nobis Dauid caelestis interpres oraculi dicens: uxor tua sicut uitis abundans in lateribus domus tuae, eo quod in ipso esset sapientiae plenitudo quae expectabatur in Christo, qui nouo repletus sapientiae sacramento, quod oculus non uidit nec auris audiuit, inusitatum nobis deferre mysterium properauit, ut nudus iaceret et exuberantis sapientiae pocula inaudita proflueret, ut obliti superiorum in nouos mores et nouam sobrietatem uitae resurgeremus aeternae, quo per stultitiam praedicationis deus agnosceretur, quem per sapientiam non cognouit hic mundus.

and him the prince of wisdom, since he had cultivated the vine and been made drunk with its fruit — for what is the vine but wisdom? as David, the interpreter of the heavenly oracle, has revealed to us, saying: “Your wife like a fruitful vine on the sides of your house” — because in him was the fullness of wisdom that was awaited in Christ. Christ, filled with the new mystery of wisdom, which “eye has not seen nor ear heard”, hastened to bring us an unheard-of mystery: to lie naked and pour out unheard-of cups of overflowing wisdom, so that, forgetting what lay behind, we might rise again to new ways and a new sobriety of eternal life, and so that through the foolishness of preaching God might be known, whom this world did not know through wisdom.

39.6.3CSEL 64:217

denique in figura illa dormientis et nudati patris qui stultitiam risit maledictus est, qui uenerati sunt benedictionis gratiam sunt adepti. ideoque qui mortem unigeniti filii dei, patris et creatoris omnium, ad offendiculum aut obprobrium nostrae fidei obiciendam esse crediderint, peccatorum suorum nexibus ad perpetuam maledictionis aerumnam tenentur adstricti; qui uero eam pro totius humani generis absolutione suscipiunt, uirtutis aeternae praesidio fulciuntur. crux enim Christi Iudaeis offendiculum, Graecis stultitia, ut apostolus dixit, nobis autem, qui credimus in dominum nostrum, uirtus dei atque sapientia est.

Finally, in that figure of the sleeping and uncovered father, the son who laughed at the folly was cursed, while those who showed reverence obtained the grace of blessing. And so those who believe that the death of the only-begotten Son of God, the Father and Creator of all, is to be thrown up as a stumbling block or a reproach to our faith are held bound by the chains of their sins to the everlasting misery of the curse; but those who accept it for the release of the whole human race are upheld by the protection of eternal power. For the cross of Christ is to the Jews a stumbling block, to the Greeks foolishness, as the apostle said, but to us who believe in our Lord it is the power and wisdom of God.

Explanation 39, chapter 7

39.7.1CSEL 64:217

Expectatus est in Moyse, cum scidisset et pertransisset undas maris et inpossibile uiribus humanis pedestris uiae aperiret in fluctibus iter, sequeretur petra, uomeret aquas, ut sitientium patrum in medio deserti uiscera interna satiaret.

He was awaited in Moses, when he had divided and crossed the waves of the sea and opened in the floods a path to walk on, impossible to human strength, when the rock followed and poured out waters to satisfy the inward parts of the thirsting fathers in the midst of the desert.

Explanation 39, chapter 8

39.8.1CSEL 64:217–218

Expectatus est et in Aaron principe sacerdotum, qui inter uiuos ac mortuos medius stetit et serpentem statuit luem mortis, ne a cadaueribus defunctorum ad uiuentium transisset interitum. quid enim tam proprium Christi quam aduocatum apud deum patrem adstare populorum, mortem suam offerre pro cunctis, repellere necem, uitam reformare perituris?

He was awaited also in Aaron, the chief of the priests, who stood between the living and the dead and checked the creeping plague of death, so that it should not pass from the corpses of the dead to the destruction of the living. For what is so proper to Christ as to stand as advocate for the peoples before God the Father, to offer his own death for all, to drive back death, to restore life to those about to perish?

Explanation 39, chapter 9

39.9.1CSEL 64:218

Expectatus est et in Iesu Naue et certe uenit, qui et potestatem suam et nomen accepit, ut et populum in terram repromissionis induceret et uere Iesus nomine uocaretur. siccauit fluenta, conuertit undas in suum fontem, solem statuit, donec consummaret in uirtute uictoriam. sed adhuc figura erat illa, non ueritas. denique uerus dux militiae caelestis effulsit et adorauit eum Iesus Naue, quamuis nondum in corpore uerus adstiterat, sed adhuc uenerat in figura.

He was awaited also in Jesus son of Nave, and surely he came, who received both his power and his name, to lead the people into the land of promise and to be truly called by the name Jesus. He dried up the streams, turned the waves back to their source, made the sun stand still until he completed the victory in power. But that was still a figure, not the truth. Finally the true leader of the heavenly army shone forth, and Jesus son of Nave worshipped him, although he had not yet stood there in a true body, but had still come in a figure.

Explanation 39, chapter 10

39.10.1CSEL 64:218

Quando igitur uerus aduenit? audi dicentem: annuntiaui et locutus sum, multiplicati sunt super numerum. sacri ficium et oblationem noluisti, corpus autem perfecisti mihi. tunc dixi: ecce uenio, in capite libri scriptum est de me; ut faciam uoluntatem tuam, deus meus, uolui. quid euidentius quam quod cum euangelii sui munere nobis Iesus uerus aduenit? ipse locutus est et innumeri credentium populi congregati sunt, qui uix singuli ante credebant. ipse uenit in carne et cessauit sacrificium Iudaeorum, cessauit oblatio pro peccato, quia peccatorum remissor aduenerat. non erat remedium necessarium legis ubi legis auctor adstabat.

When, then, did the true one come? Hear him saying: “I have announced and spoken; they are multiplied beyond number. Sacrifice and offering you did not want, but a body you have perfected for me. Then I said: See, I come; in the head of the book it is written of me; to do your will, my God, I have willed.” What is clearer than that the true Jesus came to us with the gift of his gospel? He himself spoke, and innumerable peoples of believers were gathered, where before scarcely one here and there believed. He himself came in the flesh, and the sacrifice of the Jews ceased, the offering for sin ceased, because the forgiver of sins had come. The remedy of the law was not needed where the author of the law stood present.

Explanation 39, chapter 11

39.11.1CSEL 64:218

Tunc dixi: ecce uenio, in capite libri scriptum est de me. scriptum profecto de Christo est in principio ueteris testamenti, quod uenturus esset, ut in redemptione hominum dei patris faceret uoluntatem, quando scriptum est, quia Euam in specie ecclesiae ad hominis adiumenta formauit. quid enim nobis in hac corporis infirmitate et saeculi istius pertur-

“Then I said: See, I come; in the head of the book it is written of me.” It was certainly written of Christ at the beginning of the Old Testament that he would come to do the will of God the Father in the redemption of men, when it is written that he formed Eve, as a type of the church, to be a help for man. For what can be a protection to us in this weakness of the body and the turmoil

39.11.2CSEL 64:218–219

batione praesidio potest esse nisi sola ecclesiae gratia, qua redimimur, et fides nostra, qua uiuimus? in capite libri scriptum est: os de ossibus meis et caro de carne mea. propter hoc relinquet homo patrem et matrem et adhaerebit uxori suae, et erunt duo in carne una. quis iste sit qui locutus est aut de quo istud sit sacramentum, audi dicentem: sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in ecclesia. unde et ammonet, ut sic diligat homo uxorem suam quemadmodum ecclesiam Christus, quoniam membra sumus corporis eius, de carne ipsius et de ossibus eius. quae igitur maior salus quam esse cum Christo et ei unitate quadam corporis adhaerere, in quo nec macula sit ulla nec sorditudo peccati?

of this world but the grace of the church alone, by which we are redeemed, and our faith, by which we live? In the head of the book it is written: “Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. For this reason a man will leave father and mother and cleave to his wife, and the two will be in one flesh.” Who it is who spoke, or of whom this mystery is, hear him saying: “This mystery is great, but I speak in Christ and in the church.” Hence he also admonishes that a man should love his wife as Christ loves the church, since we are members of his body, of his flesh and of his bones. What greater salvation, then, than to be with Christ and to cleave to him by a certain unity of body, in which there is neither any stain nor filth of sin?

Explanation 39, chapter 12

39.12.1CSEL 64:219

Scriptum est in capite libri, quod Abel iusti placuit hostia deo, displicuit oblatio parricidae. nonne aperte significauit dominus Iesus esse se offerendum pro nobis, ut in sua passione noui sacrificii gratiam consecraret, ritum populi parricidalis aboleret? quid autem expressius quam quod a sancto patriarcha oblatus est filius et aries immolatus est? nonne aperte ostendit hominis carnem, quae omnibus terrenis est communis animantibus, non diuinitatem unigeniti filii dei obnoxiam futuram sacrae uulneri passionis?

It is written in the head of the book that the sacrifice of righteous Abel pleased God and the offering of the fratricide displeased him. Did not the Lord Jesus plainly signify that he himself was to be offered for us, so as to consecrate in his passion the grace of a new sacrifice and to abolish the rite of a parricidal people? And what more express than that a son was offered by the holy patriarch and a ram was sacrificed? Did it not plainly show that the flesh of the man, which is common to all earthly living things, and not the divinity of the only-begotten Son of God, would be liable to the wound of the sacred passion?

Explanation 39, chapter 13

39.13.1CSEL 64:219

Scriptum est in capite libri uenturum hominem qui potestatibus caelestibus imperaret. impletum est, quando Iesus dominus uenit in terras et angeli ministrabant ei, sicut ipse dignatus est dicere: ex hoc uidebitis caelos apertos et angelos dei ascendentes et descendentes ad filium hominis..

It is written in the head of the book that a man would come who would command the heavenly powers. It was fulfilled when the Lord Jesus came to earth and angels ministered to him, as he himself deigned to say: “From now on you will see the heavens opened and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.”

Explanation 39, chapter 14

39.14.1CSEL 64:219–220

Scriptum est in capite libri: agnus sine macula mundus maturus masculus anniculus erit uobis, et occidet eum omnis synagoga. quis iste sit agnus, audisti dicentem: ecce agnus dei, ecce qui tollit peccatum mundi. hic est qui occisus est ab omni populo Iudaeorum, quem adhuc hostili odio persecuntur. et illum quidem oportebat pro omnibus mori, ut in eius cruce fieret remissio peccatorum et sanguis ipsius mundi inquinamenta lauaret. sed uae illis qui auctorem salutis propriae negauerunt! fecistis, inquit, consilium, sed non per me. quomodo poterat probare parricidium qui consilium non probabat? et tamen quanta pietas! abhorrebat quidem a consilio, sed si conuerterentur remedium non negabat.

It is written in the head of the book: “A lamb without blemish, clean, full-grown, male, a year old, shall be yours, and the whole synagogue shall slay it.” Who this lamb is you have heard him say: “Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who takes away the sin of the world.” This is he who was slain by the whole people of the Jews, whom they still pursue with hostile hatred. And it was indeed necessary for him to die for all, so that in his cross there might be forgiveness of sins and his blood might wash away the defilements of the world. But woe to those who denied the author of their own salvation! “You have made a counsel,” he says, “but not through me.” How could he approve the parricide who did not approve the counsel? And yet how great his mercy! He shrank from their counsel, but if they turned, he did not refuse them the remedy.

Explanation 39, chapter 15

39.15.1CSEL 64:220

Scriptum est etiam non solum in capite, sed in omni legis complexione uenturum hominem ad conseruandum hominum genus, qui omnia uellet quae deus uellet. unde intellegis quoniam diuinitatis eiusdem est qui eiusdem est uoluntatis. unde etiam ad sacrificium passionis uoluntarius accessit meritoque praedixit: uoluntarie sacrificabo tibi.

It is written, not only in the head but in the whole compass of the law, that a man would come to preserve the human race who would will all that God wills. From this you understand that he who is of the same will is of the same divinity. Hence too he came of his own will to the sacrifice of the passion, and rightly foretold: “Willingly I will sacrifice to you.”

Explanation 39, chapter 16

39.16.1CSEL 64:220

Sed forte dicas: quomodo in euangelio dixit: pater, si possibile est, transfer a me calicem hunc; sed non sicut ego uolo sed sicut tu uis? et uidetur esse distantia uoluntatis. uerum intellegimus aliud esse quod secundum unitatem diuinitatis exprimitur, ubi dicit: ego et pater unum sumus, aliud quod secundum hominis est locutus affectum, quem imbuit cautum esse debere nec prae-

But perhaps you say: How did he say in the gospel: “Father, if it is possible, take this cup from me; but not as I will, but as you will”? There seems to be a difference of will. But we understand that what is expressed according to the unity of the Godhead, where he says: “I and the Father are one”, is one thing, and what he spoke according to the feeling of a man is another; he taught man that he must be cautious and not presume

39.16.2CSEL 64:220–221

sumere quod facile implere non possit, ne, dum praemium quaerit, incidat sacrilegium. unde ait: cum persecuntur uos in hac ciuitate, fugite in aliam. merito ergo et hic subiturus corporis passionem coepit contristari et maestus esse et assumptis Petro et duobus filiis Zebedaei: tristis est anima mea. ante praemisit et subiecit postea: uigilate et orate, ne intretis in temptationem; spiritus promptus est, caro autem infirma. uides ubique eum secundum hominem loqui, secundum hominem orare, secundum hominem tristem esse, secundum hominem dixisse: pater meus, si possibile est. quid utique inpossibile deo? sed hominis est.

what he could not easily fulfil, lest, while he seeks the prize, he fall into sacrilege. Hence he says: “When they persecute you in this city, flee to another.” Rightly, then, here too, about to undergo the passion of the body, he began to be sorrowful and sad, and having taken Peter and the two sons of Zebedee: “My soul is sorrowful.” This he said first, and added afterwards: “Watch and pray, that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.” You see that everywhere he speaks as man, prays as man, is sad as man, said as man: “My Father, if it is possible.” What indeed is impossible to God? But it belongs to man

39.16.3CSEL 64:221

dubitare, dei confirmare. ideo promptiores assumpsit quasi electos ultimi iudicii sui testes, qui uerborum eius agnoscerent sacramentum. denique alii dormiebant, isti soli fida mente uigilabant. unde et per Hieremiam nondum suscepto corpore ipse ait: ego sicut agnus ductus sum et nesci. quid est quod nesciat sapientia dei quae in arcano patris semper est? et ideo enarrauit omnia filius dei, quia dei patris ipse sapientia est.

to doubt, to God to confirm. Therefore he took the readier ones as chosen witnesses of his last judgment, men who would recognize the mystery of his words. Finally, the others were sleeping; these alone kept watch with faithful mind. Hence also through Jeremiah, before he had taken a body, he himself says: “I was led like a lamb, and I did not know.” What is there that the Wisdom of God does not know, which is always in the secret of the Father? And therefore the Son of God has declared all things, because he himself is the Wisdom of God the Father.

39.16.4CSEL 64:221

quomodo praesciuit se sicut agnum esse ducendum, et quo duceretur nescisse se dicit? aut quomodo in superioribus per os ipsius Dauid ait: deus deus meus, quare me dereliquisti? quomodo derelinquitur a patre filius qui ait: et non sum solus, quia pater mecum est, et alibi: traditus sum et non egrediebar, et alibi: exsurrexi et adhuc tecum sum, nisi ut aduertas, quod hominum sensum exprimit, qui putant se a domino suo, quando sunt in periculis, derelictos?

How did he foreknow that he was to be led like a lamb, and yet say that he did not know where he was being led? Or how did he say above, through the mouth of David himself: “God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” How is the Son forsaken by the Father, who says: “And I am not alone, because the Father is with me”, and elsewhere: “I was delivered up and did not go out”, and elsewhere: “I arose and am still with you”— unless you are to notice that he expresses the feeling of men, who think that they have been forsaken by their Lord when they are in danger?

39.16.5CSEL 64:221–222

denique audi quod sequitur: longe, inquit, a salute mea uerba delictorum meorum, hoc est: alia uerba sunt delictorum, alia sacramenta salutis aeternae. non praeiudicant uerba uirtuti; suis uiribus substantia diuina fulcitur: homo uidetur, homo auditur, deus in operibus agnoscitur. et tamen de hoc homine dictum est: et homo est, et quis cognoscet eum? quid est quis? non quo nemo, sed quo rarus, quo sapiens, sicut illud: quis ascendet in montem domini? quis

Finally, hear what follows: “Far from my salvation,” he says, “are the words of my offences”; that is, the words of offences are one thing, the mysteries of eternal salvation another. Words do not prejudge power; the divine substance is upheld by its own strength: man is seen, man is heard, God is recognized in the works. And yet of this man it was said: “He is also a man, and who will know him?” What does “who” mean? Not that no one will, but that few will, the wise will, as in that verse: “Who shall ascend the mountain of the Lord?” “Who

39.16.6CSEL 64:222

sapiens et intelleget ea? denique alibi: uir insipiens non cognoscet et stultus non intelleget haec. et tu ergo, cum legis euangelium, quasi sapiens et non stultus cognosce quae legis; inluminet te sapientiae fulgor aeternae. uerba quidem sunt, sed et ipsa mundant et ipsa inluminant et ipsa confirmant et ipsa uiuificant. unde ait Petrus: domine, ad quem ibimus? uerba uitae aeternae habes, et non relinquemus te.

is wise, and will understand these things?” Finally elsewhere: “The foolish man will not know, and the stupid will not understand these things.” So you too, when you read the gospel, as a wise man and not a fool, understand what you read; let the brightness of eternal wisdom enlighten you. They are words, yes; but they themselves cleanse, they enlighten, they confirm, they give life. Hence Peter says: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we will not leave you.”

Explanation 39, chapter 17

39.17.1CSEL 64:222

Denique ut aduerteremus, quod secundum hominem loquitur, paulo post dixit: ecce adpropinquat hora, ut filius hominis tradatur in manus peccatorum, et Iudae osculanti ait: Iuda, osculo filium hominis tradis?, hoc est: uenenum infundis osculo quo gratia caritatis infunditur, osculo quod sacrae pacis insigne est, osculo quo amicitia fida firmatur, osculo quo fides sancta signatur? hoc ergo osculo tradis periculo quem propter osculi commercium uenerari

Finally, so that we might notice that he speaks as man, a little later he said: “See, the hour draws near when the Son of Man is to be delivered into the hands of sinners”; and to Judas as he kissed him he said: “Judas, do you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?” That is: do you pour poison into the kiss by which the grace of love is poured in, the kiss which is the sign of holy peace, the kiss by which faithful friendship is made firm, the kiss by which holy faith is sealed? With this kiss, then, do you hand over to danger one whom, because of the exchange of the kiss, you ought

39.17.2CSEL 64:222

deberes, et tradis filium hominis homo, qui propter hominum salutem descendit de caelo? sic enim scriptum est:.filius hominis qui est in caelo, ipse est qui descendit e caelo. filium hominis tradis qui te ex peccatore apostolum fecit, filium hominis tradis qui uenit, ut in sanguine suo omnium peccata dilueret? ego osculum non nego; ipse uideris qui uiolaueris osculi sanctitatem. aut non legisti, quod utilia sunt uulnera amici quam uoluntaria oscula inimici? nec inmerito grauiore

to revere; and do you, a man, betray the Son of Man, who came down from heaven for the salvation of men? For so it is written: “The Son of Man who is in heaven, he it is who came down from heaven.” Do you betray the Son of Man, who made you an apostle out of a sinner; do you betray the Son of Man, who came to wash away the sins of all in his blood? I do not refuse the kiss; it is for you to see to it, you who have violated the holiness of the kiss. Or have you not read that the wounds of a friend are more useful than the willing kisses of an enemy? And not undeservedly with a heavier

39.17.3CSEL 64:222–223

telo tantae dignationis percussus est ludas quam si eum fulmine perculisset. denique patientiam domini ferre non potuit qui maiestatem prodidit, adeo ut sibi ipsi tanti sceleris reatus non posset ablui. itaque a biL, pecuniam refudit, hoc est condemnauit auaritiam suam tantae impietatis auctorem, pretium perfidiae synagogae reddidit. non excusatur proditor, qui paenitentiae locum inuenire non potuit, sed acerbatur sacrilegium Iudaeorum, qui etiam proditoris uocibus arguuntur. ille suum crimen agnouit, dicens quod tradiderit sanguinem iustum; isti et pretium sceleris receperunt et acrioribus studiis iustitiae principem persecuti sunt.

weapon of such great condescension was Judas struck than if he had struck him with a thunderbolt. Finally, he who betrayed the majesty could not bear the patience of the Lord, so that the guilt of so great a crime could not be washed away by himself. And so … he paid back the money, that is, he condemned his avarice, the author of such great impiety, and returned the price of treachery to the synagogue. The traitor is not excused, for he could find no place for repentance; but the sacrilege of the Jews is made heavier, for they are refuted even by the traitor’s words. He acknowledged his crime, saying that he had betrayed righteous blood; they both received the price of the crime and persecuted the prince of righteousness with fiercer zeal.

39.17.4CSEL 64:223

ideo ad istorum omnium perpetuam condemnationem latro crucifixus absoluitur, quia ille Christum in suppliciis agnouit suis, quem isti in beneficiis non agnouerunt, et peccatum suum confessus est Christo qui sciret ignoscere, quia in cruce sua regnum domini mente conspexit, quod in conuiuio Christi ludas uidere non potuit.

Therefore, to the everlasting condemnation of all of these, the crucified thief is absolved: because he acknowledged Christ in his own punishment, whom they did not acknowledge in his benefits, and confessed his sin to Christ, who knew how to forgive; because on his cross he discerned in his mind the Lord’s kingdom, which Judas could not see at Christ’s supper.

39.17.5CSEL 64:223

ideo precationem latronis uox secuta est caelestis huiusmodi: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. tripudiabas, draco, quod apostolum subtraxeras Christo: plus amisisti quam sustulisti, qui latronem uides in paradisum esse translatum. nemo est qui possit excludi, quando receptus est latro minister tuus et eo peruenit, unde ipse deiectus es.

Therefore the thief’s prayer was followed by a heavenly voice of this kind: “Amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” You exulted, dragon, that you had taken an apostle away from Christ: you have lost more than you took, you who see a thief carried over into paradise. There is no one who can be shut out, when a thief, your servant, has been received and has reached the place from which you yourself were cast down.

Explanation 39, chapter 18

39.18.1CSEL 64:223–224

Subtexuimus ista propter illum uersiculum, quia dixit: ut faciam uoluntatem tuam, deus meus, uolui, hoc est: diuinitatis mihi tecum, pater, una uoluntas est, et quia una uoluntas, una substantia est et inseparabilis maiestas et potentia trinitatis. sed alia uox carnis, et tamen ad uoluntatem dei et ipsa consensit dicens: non quod ego uolo sed quod tu uis, et alibi: si non potest hoc transire nisi illud

We have added these things because of that verse, for he said: “To do your will, my God, I have willed”, that is: Father, my will of the Godhead is one with yours; and because there is one will, there is one substance and an inseparable majesty and power of the Trinity. But the voice of the flesh is another, and yet it too consented to the will of God, saying: “Not what I will, but what you will”, and elsewhere: “If this cannot pass unless I

39.18.2CSEL 64:224

bibam, fiat uoluntas tua. communis affectus est mortem timere, quem suscepit Christus, ut crucifigeret, sicut crucifixit, et carnem; mihi enim est luctatus, ut mihi uinceret. etsi caro Christi fortis nec peccato obnoxia, tamen peccata suscepit; infirmitates suscepit, etsi nihil habuit quod doleret. denique audi dicentem:

drink it, your will be done.” To fear death is a common feeling, which Christ took on in order to crucify it, as he crucified the flesh too; for he wrestled for me, to conquer for me. Though the flesh of Christ was strong and not subject to sin, yet he took on sins; he took on weaknesses, though he had nothing to grieve over. Finally, hear one saying:

39.18.3CSEL 64:224

quia pro nobis dolet, donec eiciat in ueritate iudicium. non enim alteram carnem, sed hanc suscepit, ut apostolus docet dicens: oportet enim corruptibile hoc induere incorruptionem et mortale hoc inmortalitatem. etsi de uirgine natus et sancto est spiritu, tamen hominis est filius, quia homo uirgo. et ideo quod natum est ex carne caro est et qui natus est de homine homo dicitur, mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesus.

“that he grieves for us, until he brings forth judgment in truth.” For he did not take on another flesh, but this one, as the apostle teaches, saying: “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal immortality.” Though he was born of the Virgin and of the Holy Spirit, yet he is the son of man, because the virgin is human. And therefore what is born of the flesh is flesh, and he who is born of a human being is called man: “the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”

Explanation 39, chapter 19

39.19.1CSEL 64:224

Propterea incorruptibilis suscepit hanc carnem, ut faceret incorruptibilem, et inmortalis, ut faceret inmortalem. si quis ergo eum sequitur, induet inmortalitatem; si quis uoluntatem eius facit, non morietur in aeternum, sed dicet ei Christus: hodie mecum eris in paradiso. quid est hodie? hoc est: de nocte transisti, mecum eris in lumine;

For this reason the incorruptible took on this flesh, to make it incorruptible, and the immortal, to make it immortal. If anyone, then, follows him, he will put on immortality; if anyone does his will, he will not die for ever, but Christ will say to him: “Today you will be with me in paradise.” What is “today”? That is: you have passed out of night, you will be with me in light;

39.19.2CSEL 64:224

noli tenebras formidare quem aeterna lux suscepit. pulchre etiam subiunxit: mecum eris in paradiso, hoc est: noli dubitare de carne, et me in carne uidisti. noli timere, ne et tu cadas de paradiso sicut cecidit Adam, sed audi quia mecum eris, quo cadere praesente non possis.

do not fear darkness, you whom eternal light has received. Beautifully, too, he added: “You will be with me in paradise”, that is: do not doubt about the flesh; you have seen me too in the flesh. Do not fear that you too may fall from paradise as Adam fell, but hear that you will be with me, in whose presence you cannot fall.

39.19.3CSEL 64:224–225

ceciderat caro in paradiso, antequam susciperetur a Christo. ibi eris susceptus, ubi et ille qui suscepit, qui non mentitus est dicens: uolo ut ubi ego sum et illi sint mecum. non recedet pastor a gregibus suis, licet iam lupum in paradiso timere non possis, cui dictum est: uidebam satanan sicut fulgur de caelo cadentem. ideo ante consummationem aduersarius deicitur in incendium, catenis quoque perpetuis alligatur, ut tu iam nullas insidias pertimescas.

The flesh had fallen in paradise before it was taken up by Christ. You will be received there where he too is who took it up, who did not lie when he said: “I will that where I am they too may be with me.” The shepherd will not depart from his flocks, although you can no longer fear the wolf in paradise, of whom it was said: “I saw Satan falling like lightning from heaven.” Therefore before the consummation the adversary is cast down into the burning and is bound with everlasting chains, so that you need no longer fear any snares.

Explanation 39, chapter 20

39.20.1CSEL 64:225

Et Adam, ut caderet, a serpente deceptus est et flexus est ab uxore. ideo iam nullae in paradiso nuptiae, sed omnes erunt sine celebritatibus nuptiarum sicut angeli in caelo. non dixerat Adae mecum eris, quia sciebat illum esse casurum, ut redimeretur a Christo. felix ruina, quae reparatur in melius. ideo iam pius pastor, bonus negotiator gregem suum et mercem propriam non relinquit. erit quidem et adhuc in paradiso cum angelis pugna serpenti, donec deiciatur; sed qui cum Christo est timere non poterit.

And Adam, so that he fell, was deceived by the serpent and swayed by his wife. Therefore there will be no more marriages in paradise, but all will be without the celebrations of marriage, like the angels in heaven. He had not said to Adam “You will be with me”, because he knew that he would fall, so as to be redeemed by Christ. Happy ruin, which is repaired for the better! Therefore now the kind shepherd, the good merchant, does not leave his flock and his own merchandise. There will indeed still be a fight in paradise with the angels against the serpent, until he is cast down; but whoever is with Christ will not be able to fear.

39.20.2CSEL 64:225

Adam cum Christo non fuit, quando deceptus est; nam si cum Christo fuisset et in eius praeceptione mansisset, perire utique non potuisset. non mansit in Christo, quia non in eius sermone permansit. denique audi qui maneat in Christo: si manseritis, inquit, in me et uerba mea in uobis manserint, quodcumque uolueritis petetis et fiet uobis, et infra: si praecepta mea seruaueritis, manebitis in mea dilectione. uis scire, quia non cum Christo Adam? dixit ei dominus: Adam, ubi es?

Adam was not with Christ when he was deceived; for if he had been with Christ and had remained in his command, he certainly could not have perished. He did not remain in Christ, because he did not abide in his word. Finally, hear who remains in Christ: “If you remain in me,” he says, “and my words remain in you, you will ask whatever you will and it will be done for you”; and below: “If you keep my commandments, you will remain in my love.” Do you want to know that Adam was not with Christ? The Lord said to him: “Adam, where are you?”

39.20.3CSEL 64:225–226

qui utique quasi absentem requirit, non diceret: ubi es?, si eum in se manere cognosceret. sed quis eum absentem fecerit, audiamus: absconderunt se, inquit, ambo a facie domini. omnes uidet Christus, sed qui se abscondit absconditur, quoniam qui ignorat ignorabitur; cognoscit enim dominus eos qui sunt

He who seeks him as though absent would surely not say “Where are you?” if he knew that he remained in him. But let us hear who made him absent: “They both hid themselves,” it says, “from the face of the Lord.” Christ sees all, but the one who hides himself is hidden, since “he who does not know will not be known”; for “the Lord knows those who are

39.20.4CSEL 64:226

ipsius. ille omnes suos uult esse, quos condidit et creauit. utinam tu, homo, non fugias et te ipse a Christo abscondas! ille etiam fugientes requirit et absconditos non uult perire, sed clamat dicens: Adam, ubi es?, hoc est: homo, ubi es? ego te in lumine posui, tu tenebras requisisti.

his.” He wants all whom he formed and created to be his. Would that you, man, did not flee and hide yourself from Christ! He seeks even those who flee and does not want the hidden to perish, but cries out, saying: “Adam, where are you?”, that is: Man, where are you? I set you in light; you have sought out darkness.

Explanation 39, chapter 21

39.21.1CSEL 64:226

Denique in paradiso, ubi semper matutinus dies, uesper est factus, quoniam omnia tenebrosa peccata sunt. ideo habes, quia audierunt uocem domini dei deambulantis ad uesperam in paradiso. simul cognosce mysterium. mane errasti, ad uesperam liberaris. quomodo enim uespera, ubi Christus est?

Finally, in paradise, where the day is always morning, evening came, since all sins are darkness. Therefore you have it that they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in paradise toward evening. Recognize the mystery as well: in the morning you went astray, toward evening you are set free. For how is there evening where Christ is?

39.21.2CSEL 64:226

nam licet sedes eius supra caelum caelorum, tamen in sanctis suis Christus est. quomodo ergo uesper ubi deus est, cum deus lux sit? denique Saulo in itinere lux refulsit, quando ei Christus occurrit, unde etiam lumine dei refulgente caecatus persecutor. cur ergo caecatus, nisi quia non agnouerat Christum? nam si cognouisset lucis arbitrum, non amisisset lumen oculorum. denique et ubi agnouit recepit. iudicio est quod non nouerat Christum, quia audita uoce: Saule Saule, quid me persequeris? respondit: quis es, domine? non quaesisset quis esset, si cognouisset.

For although his seat is above the heaven of heavens, yet Christ is in his saints. How, then, is there evening where God is, since God is light? Finally, a light shone around Saul on the road when Christ met him, so that the persecutor was blinded as the light of God shone. Why, then, was he blinded, unless because he had not known Christ? For if he had known the arbiter of light, he would not have lost the light of his eyes. And indeed when he acknowledged him, he received it back. It is evidence that he had not known Christ that, when he heard the voice: “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”, he answered: “Who are you, Lord?” He would not have asked who he was if he had known him.

39.21.3CSEL 64:226–227

unde et dominus quasi ignoranti dicit: ego sum Iesus quem tu persequeris. durum tibi est aduersus stimulum calcitrare. et ille dixit: domine, quid me facere oportet? uide congruentia utrorumque magisteria. medicus minatur ut corrigat, tenet ut curet. aeger primo medici personam requirit, si sit idoneus a quo sanari se posse praesumat; ubi medicinae audiuit auctorem, remedium poposcit, salutem inuenit. denique ab accedente non solum expulit caecitatem, sed etiam lucem quam non habuerat accepit, ut Christum uideret quem antea non uiderat.

Hence the Lord too says, as to one who did not know: “I am Jesus whom you persecute. It is hard for you to kick against the goad.” And he said: “Lord, what must I do?” See how fittingly each plays his part. The physician threatens in order to correct, holds fast in order to cure. The sick man first asks who the physician is, whether he is competent, from whom he may expect to be healed; when he heard the author of the medicine, he asked for the remedy, and found health. Finally, when he came, not only was his blindness driven away, but he also received a light he had not had, so that he saw Christ whom before he had not seen.

Explanation 39, chapter 22

39.22.1CSEL 64:227

Sed uideamus sequentia, repetito tamen uersiculo de quo uidetur esse tractatum: ecce uenio, ut faciam uoluntatem tuam, deus meus, uolui, et legem tuam in medio cordis mei. bene nuntiaui iustitiam tuam in ecclesia magna; ecce labia mea non prohibebo. domine, tu cognouisti iustitiam tuam; non abscondi in corde meo.

But let us look at what follows, repeating, however, the verse that seems to have been treated: “See, I come, to do your will, my God, I have willed, and your law in the midst of my heart. I have well announced your righteousness in the great church; see, I will not restrain my lips. Lord, you have known your righteousness; I have not hidden it in my heart.”

39.22.2CSEL 64:227

de superiore itaque uersiculo intellegimus: ecce uenio: non solum uoluntatem tuam faciam, sed etiam legem tuam in medio cordis mei. alii habent: in medio uentris mei. est enim uenter et mentis, qui semina concipit sensuum, de quo Esaias dixit: in utero accepimus et parturiuimus spiritum salutis. hoc utero parturiuit et Paulus, qui ait: filioli mei, quos ego parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis. Christus ergo non in

From the earlier verse, then, we understand: “See, I come”: not only will I do your will, but also your law, in the midst of my heart. Others have: “in the midst of my belly”. For there is also a belly of the mind, which conceives the seeds of thoughts, of which Isaiah said: “In the womb we have conceived and brought forth the spirit of salvation.” With this womb Paul too was in labour, who says: “My little children, with whom I am in labour until Christ is formed in you.” Christ, then, is formed not in a

39.22.3CSEL 64:227

corporeo, sed in animae quodam uentre formatur. hoc uentre apostolus genuit, sicut scriptum est: ego uos per euangelium genui. ideo alii habent: in medio cordis, alii: in medio uentris, ut interioris hominis uentrem intellegas, qui in medio esse cordis accipitur, in quo naturalis legis praescripta seruamus, quae non solum custoditur, sed etiam fit in cordibus nostris. unde et scriptum est, quia non solum auditores legis iusti sunt apud deum, sed etiam factores legis iustificabuntur.

bodily womb but in a certain womb of the soul. In this womb the apostle begot, as it is written: “I have begotten you through the gospel.” Therefore some have “in the midst of the heart”, others “in the midst of the belly”, so that you may understand the womb of the inner man, which is taken to be in the midst of the heart, in which we keep the precepts of the natural law, which is not only kept but also done in our hearts. Hence also it is written that not only the hearers of the law are righteous before God, but the doers of the law will be justified.

39.22.4CSEL 64:227–228

sunt enim qui naturaliter ea quae legis sunt faciunt, sicut gentes qui legem non audiunt et sibi lex sunt, qui incognita sibi legis praecepta conseruant. ergo quasi gentilis populi congregator personam nostram suscepit hoc loco Christus, ut diceret facere se legem in medio cordis sui. siquidem populus nationum legem quam non audiuit impleuit, ut agnosceret Christum, quem populus Iudaeorum qui legem acceperat non recepit nec cognoscendum putauit, quia scriptum est: agnouit bos possessorem suum et asinus praesepe domini sui;

For there are those who by nature do what belongs to the law, like the gentiles, who do not hear the law and are a law to themselves, who keep precepts of the law that are unknown to them. Here, then, Christ, as the gatherer of the gentile people, has taken on our person, to say that he does the law in the midst of his heart. For the people of the nations fulfilled the law it had not heard, so as to acknowledge Christ, whom the people of the Jews, which had received the law, did not receive and did not think should be acknowledged, because it is written: “The ox knew its owner and the ass its master’s crib;

39.22.5CSEL 64:228

Israel autem me non cognouit. hic ergo credentium uenter est in quo spiritus sanctus operatur et eum semine spiritali implere consueuit, sicut testificatur in euangelio dominus Iesus, qui ait: qui credit in me, sicut dicit scriptura, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. ex illo flumine ista sunt flumina, de quo legimus: fluminis impetus laetificat ciuitatem dei. de quibus ergo fluunt huiusmodi flumina spiritalia, de his bene dicitur: eleuauerunt flumina, domine, eleuauerunt flumina uocem suam a uoce aquarum spiritalium, quae supra caelos deum laudant.

but Israel has not known me.” This, then, is the belly of believers, in which the Holy Spirit works and which he is accustomed to fill with spiritual seed, as the Lord Jesus testifies in the gospel, saying: “He who believes in me, as the Scripture says, rivers of living water will flow from his belly.” From that river come these rivers, of which we read: “The rush of the river gladdens the city of God.” Of those, then, from whom such spiritual rivers flow it is well said: “The rivers have lifted up, Lord, the rivers have lifted up their voice from the voice of spiritual waters”, which praise God above the heavens.

Explanation 39, chapter 23

39.23.1CSEL 64:228

Qui eleuauerit uocem suam, hic potest dicere: bene nuntiaui iustitiam tuam in ecclesia magna. quid est quod addidit magna, nisi quia fuit ante non magna? quae est magna nisi de totius orbis terrarum partibus congregata,

He who has lifted up his voice can say: “I have well announced your righteousness in the great church.” Why did he add “great”, unless because before it was not great? Which church is great, unless the one gathered from all parts of the whole world,

39.23.2CSEL 64:228–229

quando ab oriente et occidente, septentrione et meridie populi gentium sunt uocati? ubi tamen legimus alibi magnam ecclesiam: confitebor tibi. domine, in ecclesia magna, in populo graui laudabo te, ibi ergo ecclesia magna ubi populus grauis, hoc est non inquietus et mobilis, qui sedit manducare et bibere et surrexit ludere. grauis populus est qui fidem deo suo seruat et qui non aliqua leuitate mutetur neque nutet et fluctuet, sed caritate sit fundatus in Christo, ut possit dicere: confido enim quia neque mors neque gladius neque tribulatio separare me possit a caritate dei quae est in Christo Iesu.

when peoples of the nations were called from east and west, north and south? Yet where do we read elsewhere of the great church? “I will confess to you, Lord, in the great church; among a weighty people I will praise you.” There, then, is the great church, where the people is weighty, that is, not restless and fickle, like the people that “sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play”. A weighty people is one that keeps faith with its God and is not changed by any levity, nor wavers and fluctuates, but is founded in Christ by love, so that it can say: “For I am confident that neither death nor sword nor tribulation can separate me from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus.”

Explanation 39, chapter 24

39.24.1CSEL 64:229

Qui autem praedicat in ecclesia magna, non abscondit iustitiam dei in corde suo, sed exaltat uiribus uocem suam, annuntiat Christum. non timet eum coram populo praedicare, non erubescit crucem eius, sed gloriatur in illa domini passione. non sequitur litteram legis, sed eruit profunda mysteria, quibus reuelet domini Iesu gloriam, quem lex significauit esse uenturum ad ecclesiam quae magna est congreganda. iustitia igitur fides est. denique credidit Abraham deo et reputatum est ei ad iustitiam. ecce labia mea non prohibebo. domine, tu cognouisti. sic et alibi: tu cognouisti sessionem meam et resurrectionem meam.

He who preaches in the great church does not hide the righteousness of God in his heart, but raises his voice with strength and announces Christ. He is not afraid to preach him before the people; he is not ashamed of his cross, but glories in that passion of the Lord. He does not follow the letter of the law, but digs out the deep mysteries by which to reveal the glory of the Lord Jesus, whom the law signified would come to the church that is to be gathered and is great. Righteousness, then, is faith. Finally, “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him for righteousness.” “See, I will not restrain my lips. Lord, you have known.” So too elsewhere: “You have known my sitting down and my rising up.”

Explanation 39, chapter 25

39.25.1CSEL 64:229

Ad patrem dicit: iustitiam meam non abscondi in corde meo, ueritatem tuam et salutare tuum dixi. totus ex persona Christi psalmus iste est. ideo iustitiam meam dicit, licet non arroganter et homo possit dicere iustitiam suam, qui deo credit et fidem suam sibi reputari ad iustitiam confitetur. ueritatem et misericordiam diligit, qui fidem praedicat ueram et peccata dimittit. ideo enim Christus aduenit, ut fidem statueret, remissionem tribueret peccatorum.

To the Father he says: “My righteousness I have not hidden in my heart; your truth and your salvation I have spoken.” This whole psalm is from the person of Christ. Therefore he says “my righteousness”, though a man too may say “his righteousness” without arrogance, if he believes God and confesses that his faith is reckoned to him for righteousness. He loves truth and mercy who preaches the true faith and forgives sins. For Christ came for this: to establish faith and to grant forgiveness of sins.

Explanation 39, chapter 26

39.26.1CSEL 64:229–230

Et quia ex persona saluatoris totum hunc esse diximus psalmum, ne forte dicant Apollinaristae: ecce corpus, dixit, praeparasti mihi, non etiam animam, audiant in inferioribus psalmi huius dicentem: confundantur et reuereantur simul qui quaerunt animam meam, ut auferant eam.

And since we have said that this whole psalm is from the person of the Saviour, lest the Apollinarians perhaps say: “See, he said: you have prepared a body for me”, not a soul as well, let them hear him saying in the later part of this psalm: “Let them be confounded and put to shame together who seek my soul, to take it away.”

Explanation 39, chapter 27

39.27.1CSEL 64:230

Haec sunt, quae in hoc psalmo (ardua) arbitrati sumus. reliqua plana et facilia nec indiga interpretationis aestimauimus, cum, si in tractatum incidant in alio psalmo, in quo uidentur esse repetita, rectius prosequemur fauente domino Iesu, cui est laus, honor, gloria, perpetuitas a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

These are the things in this psalm that we judged (difficult). The rest we reckoned plain and easy and in no need of interpretation; if they come up for treatment in another psalm in which they seem to be repeated, we will go through them more properly, with the favour of the Lord Jesus, to whom be praise, honour, glory and everlastingness from the ages, now and always and for all ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 40, chapter 1

40.1.1CSEL 64:230

Bono ordine, qui in superiore psalmo dixit: ecce uenio, in hoc iam uenit et patitur. et ideo quadragesimus psalmus inscribitur, quia quadraginta diebus ieiunauit dominus Iesus, ut eo numero consummaret hominis qui perierat perfectionem. sicut enim per appetentiam interdicti fructus amiserat gratiam, ita per ieiunium reparari eius uirtutem oportuit, ut, qui perierat in Adam, repararetur in Christo. ideo ergo in finem, quia ipse finis est spei nostrae, ad ipsum studia nostra dirigimus, ad ipsum

In good order, he who in the preceding psalm said, “See, I come,” in this one has now come and suffers. And therefore it is entitled the fortieth psalm, because the Lord Jesus fasted forty days, so as to complete by that number the perfection of the man who had perished. For as man had lost grace through craving for the forbidden fruit, so it was fitting that his virtue should be restored through fasting, so that the one who had perished in Adam might be restored in Christ. Therefore, then, “to the end”, because he himself is the end of our hope; to him we direct our efforts, to him

40.1.2CSEL 64:230–231

uota nostra conferimus, quia ipse est plenitudo, ipse est consummatio uniuersorum, ipse omnium summa uirtutum. ideo ipsi Dauid quasi ei, qui solus ex omnibus in sua carne nostra peccata suscepit, qui solus dei agnus peccatum totius mundi abstulit, qui solus chirographum decreti sanguinis sui effusione deleuit et tulit de medio atque affixit cruci, quasi sapientia, sciens quomodo uetus peccatum mundi solueret, quasi redemptio, quomodo hominem renouaret a culpa, quasi sanctificatio, quomodo eum sanctificaret ad gratiam. hic ergo titulus, hoc principium.

we bring our prayers, because he is the fullness, he is the consummation of all things, he is the sum of all virtues. Therefore “to David himself”, as to him who alone of all took on our sins in his flesh, who alone, the Lamb of God, took away the sin of the whole world, who alone blotted out the handwriting of the decree by the shedding of his blood and took it out of the way and nailed it to the cross; as to Wisdom, knowing how to undo the ancient sin of the world; as to Redemption, how to renew man from guilt; as to Sanctification, how to sanctify him for grace. This, then, is the title; this the beginning.

Explanation 40, chapter 2

40.2.1CSEL 64:231

Beatus qui intellegit super egenum et paupere. aperi aures tuas, qui incipis sacramenta dominicae cognoscere passionis. ideo tibi dicitur: qui habet aures audiendi audiat. ideo surdo illi et muto aures et labia tetigit dominus in euangelio, ut sciret quid audiret in mysterio, quid etiam loqueretur et quando loqueretur. neque enim otiose scriptum est: dominus mihi dedit linguam eruditionis, ut scirem quando oporteat sermonem dicere. scire ergo debes quid audias, scire quid loqui debeas, scire etiam quando loqui debeas.

“Blessed is he who understands concerning the needy and the poor.” Open your ears, you who are beginning to know the mysteries of the Lord’s passion. That is why it is said to you: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.” That is why in the gospel the Lord touched the ears and lips of that deaf and dumb man, so that he might know what he was hearing in the mystery, and also what he should speak and when he should speak. For it is not idly written: “The Lord has given me a tongue of instruction, that I may know when I ought to speak a word.” You must know, then, what you hear, know what you ought to say, know also when you ought to speak.

Explanation 40, chapter 3

40.3.1CSEL 64:231

Audi ergo dicentem: beatus qui intellegit super egenum et paupere. beatus quidem qui compatitur pauperi, qui haurit eius necessitates, scit quid mali inopia afferat indigenti; sed quid sibi uult istud exordium in domini passione? uerum est quidem quod propter pauperes passus est, sed tamen ipse corripuit ludam dicentem de illo unguento, quod effuderat Maria super pedes Christi: potuit hoc uenundari trecentis denariis et dari pauperibus.

Hear him, then, saying: “Blessed is he who understands concerning the needy and the poor.” Blessed indeed is he who has compassion on the poor man, who takes his needs to heart, who knows what evil want brings to the needy; but what does this opening mean in the Lord’s passion? It is true indeed that he suffered for the sake of the poor; and yet he himself rebuked Judas when he said of that ointment which Mary had poured on the feet of Christ: “This could have been sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor.”

40.3.2CSEL 64:231

idem et ceteri apostoli senserant, sed alio affectu, ille per auaritiam, isti per misericordiam; ludas enim furto prospiciebat, discipuli pauperum alimoniae consulebant. quibus in commune respondit: sinite illam, ut in diem sepulturae meae seruet illud; pauperes enim semper habetis uobiscum, me autem non semper.

The other apostles had felt the same, but with a different disposition: he out of avarice, they out of mercy; for Judas was looking to his thieving, the disciples were concerned for the feeding of the poor. To them in common he replied: “Let her alone, so that she may keep it for the day of my burial; for the poor you always have with you, but me you do not always have.”

Explanation 40, chapter 4

40.4.1CSEL 64:231–232

Ergo alius intellegendus est hic beatus qui intellegit super pauperem. hic de fide dicit, alibi de misericordia; prior ergo fides, secunda misericordia. cum fide pretiosa misericordia, sine fide nuda, sine fide instabilis; fides enim uirtutum omnium stabile fundamentum est. beatus ergo qui intellegit super Christi inopiam et paupertatem, qui propter nos pauper factus est, cum diues esset; diues in regno, pauper in carne, quia suscepit hanc pauperum carnem. pauperes enim facti sumus nimis, qui uirtutum exuuias pretiosas fraude serpentis amisimus exclusi de paradiso, eiecti de patria,

So another must be understood here as the blessed man who understands concerning the poor. Here he speaks of faith, elsewhere of mercy; faith, then, comes first, mercy second. With faith mercy is precious; without faith it is bare, without faith unstable; for faith is the firm foundation of all virtues. Blessed, then, is he who understands concerning the want and poverty of Christ, who for our sake became poor, though he was rich: rich in the kingdom, poor in the flesh, because he took on this flesh of the poor. For we had become exceedingly poor, we who through the serpent’s fraud lost the precious spoils of virtues, shut out of paradise, cast out of our homeland,

40.4.2CSEL 64:232

in exilium relegati, ipso quoque nudati corporis tegumento, quod antea uirtutum saepta munibant, postea delicta nudarunt. si ergo egenus et pauper in carne, utique egenus et pauper in carnis istius passione. non ergo in diuitiis suis, sed in nostra passus est paupertate. ideoque non plenitudo diuinitatis quae in illo corporaliter habitat, ut scriptura testatur, sed caro passa est. hoc intellege, hoc persequere, id tene, ne dicatur tibi:

banished into exile, stripped even of the covering of the body, which before the hedges of the virtues had protected and afterwards our offences laid bare. If, then, he was needy and poor in the flesh, surely he was needy and poor in the passion of that flesh. So he suffered not in his riches but in our poverty. And therefore it was not the fullness of the Godhead which dwells in him bodily, as Scripture testifies, but the flesh that suffered. Understand this, pursue this, hold this, so that it may not be said to you:

40.4.3CSEL 64:232

noluit intellegere super mendicum et pauperem. nam si hic dubitas, certe in illo psalmo, qui aduersus proditionem Iudae ex persona dicitur saluatoris, de illo uersiculo dubitare non poteris, in quo ait: et persecutus est hominem pauperem et mendicum. intellege ergo in paupertatem Christi, ut diues sis, intellege in infirmitatem eius, ut accipias sanitatem, intellege in crucem eius, ut non erubescas, intellege in uulnus eius, ut uulnera tua cures, intellege in mortem eius, ut adquiras uitam aeternam, intellege in sepulturam eius, ut inuenias resurrectionem.

“He would not understand concerning the beggar and the poor.” For if you doubt here, certainly in that psalm which is spoken in the person of the Saviour against the betrayal of Judas you will not be able to doubt that verse in which he says: “And he persecuted the poor man and the beggar.” Understand, then, the poverty of Christ, that you may be rich; understand his weakness, that you may receive health; understand his cross, that you may not be ashamed; understand his wound, that you may heal your wounds; understand his death, that you may gain eternal life; understand his burial, that you may find resurrection.

Explanation 40, chapter 5

40.5.1CSEL 64:232

Sed forte dicas: quomodo diues in paupertate Christus? etsi meum ingenium deficiat, tamen non deficiunt diuinarum subsidia lectionum, cum dixerit apostolus: quoniam dominus Iesus pauper factus est, cum diues esset, ut uos eius inopia ditaremini. quae ergo ista paupertas quae diuites facit? consideremus eam, intendamus in ipsum uenerabile sacramentum. quid purius potest eo esse atque simplicius?

But perhaps you say: How is Christ rich in poverty? Though my own wit may fail, yet the help of the divine readings does not fail, since the apostle has said: “For the Lord Jesus became poor, though he was rich, that by his want you might be made rich.” What, then, is this poverty that makes men rich? Let us consider it; let us turn our attention to that venerable mystery itself. What can be purer or simpler than it?

40.5.2CSEL 64:232–233

non taurino quisquam perfunditur sanguine, ut sacra dicuntur habere gentilium, non hircorum atque arietum cruore peccator lauatur — neque enim purificatur; caro enim lauatur, non culpa diluitur -, sed: exi, inquit, aqua cum delectatione de fontibus salutaris, et paratur in conspectu tuo mensa caelestis, et poculum inebrians quam praeclarum est. haec sunt diuitiae simplicitatis, in quibus est Christi pretiosa paupertas. est et in moribus paupertas bona, unde et dominus dixit:

No one is drenched in a bull’s blood, as the rites of the gentiles are said to require; the sinner is not washed with the gore of goats and rams — for he is not purified; the flesh is washed, the guilt is not washed away — but: “Go out,” he says, “water, with delight from the fountains of salvation”, and a heavenly table is prepared in your sight, and the cup that inebriates, how excellent it is! These are the riches of simplicity, in which is the precious poverty of Christ. There is also a good poverty in conduct, and so the Lord said:

40.5.3CSEL 64:233

beati pauperes spiritu, et in psalmis inuenimus, quia dominus humiles spiritu saluabit. est et in collatione tenui paupertas abundans, si abundet fides. unde apostolus ait: et profunda paupertas eorum abundauit in diuitiis simplicitatis eorum.

“Blessed are the poor in spirit”; and in the psalms we find that the Lord will save the humble in spirit. There is also an abundant poverty in a slender contribution, if faith abounds. Hence the apostle says: “And their deep poverty abounded in the riches of their simplicity.”

Explanation 40, chapter 6

40.6.1CSEL 64:233

Ut autem et ex aliis uocibus eius intellegamus, quia ipse se pauperem dixit, habemus alibi scriptum: pauper et dolens ego sum, hoc est quia pro nobis dolet, ut legimus; neque enim in se habuit quod doleret. sicut ergo pro nobis dolet, ut Esaias interpretatus est qui eum uidit in spiritu, pro nobis utique tristis erat, iuxta quod animam suam tristem appellauit usque ad mortem, tamen non propter mortem, et carnem dixit infirmam quae mortis subiacuit infirmitati, ut aculeum mortis infringeret, quo nos in die iudicii liberaret, quam non perfunctorie malam dixit.

And that we may understand from other sayings of his as well that he called himself poor, we have it written elsewhere: “I am poor and in sorrow”, that is, because he grieves for us, as we read; for he had nothing in himself to grieve over. As, then, he grieves for us, as Isaiah, who saw him in the Spirit, explained, so surely it was for us that he was sad, according to which he called his soul sorrowful even to death, yet not because of death; and he called the flesh weak which was subject to the weakness of death, so that he might break the sting of death, and so free us on the day of judgment, which not lightly he called evil.

Explanation 40, chapter 7

40.7.1CSEL 64:233–234

Sic enim subtexuit: in die mala liberabit eum dominus, quoniam amara uidetur quae plures adiudicat poenae. uia enim angusta uirtutis est, lata delicti; ideo rariores in uirtute ambulant, plures in flagitio uersantur. quo fit, ut inferior eorum sit numerus, qui praemia remunerationis accipient quam qui ob pretium grauium peccatorum sortem aduersam iudicii reportabunt. quasi dolens igitur dixit malam iudicii diem. nam si angeli in unius peccatoris absolutione laetantur, quanto magis homines in

For so he added: “In the evil day the Lord will deliver him”, since that day seems bitter which assigns many to punishment. For the way of virtue is narrow, that of sin broad; therefore fewer walk in virtue, more are engaged in wickedness. So it comes about that the number of those who will receive the rewards of recompense is smaller than of those who, as the price of grave sins, will carry away the adverse lot of judgment. As one grieving, then, he called the day of judgment evil. For if the angels rejoice at the absolution of one sinner, how much more will men

40.7.2CSEL 64:234

tantorum condemnatione hominum macerabuntur! et bene dolet pro ea oue quam humeris suis reportauit et ad ouile suum reuocauit errantem. affectu nostro loquitur dei filius, quia nobis dies iudicii acerba est quam timemus. omnibus mala uidetur, quia plena terroris est, qua deus non solum forensia hominis, sed etiam occulta diiudicat, qua cogitur unusquisque aperire quod fecit aut quod sensit. ideoque multi damnantur, pauci coronantur. sed etiam ipsi qui coronantur dolebunt;

be grieved at the condemnation of so many men! And rightly he grieves for that sheep which he carried back on his shoulders and called back, as it strayed, to his fold. The Son of God speaks with our feeling, because the day of judgment is bitter to us, and we fear it. To all it seems evil, because it is full of terror, the day on which God judges not only the public acts of man but also his hidden ones, on which each is compelled to lay open what he did or what he thought. And therefore many are condemned, few are crowned. But even those who are crowned will grieve;

40.7.3CSEL 64:234

iusti enim coronabuntur, iustus autem quasi suam putat fratris aerumnam. et quis ego sum qui de illa iudicem, qua homo angelorum conciliis inseretur? ipsius domini audiamus sententiam: ueniet, inquit, hora in qua omnes qui in monumentis sunt audient uocem filii hominis et procedent qui bona fecerunt in resurrectionem uitae, qui mala fecerunt in resurrectionem iudicii. iudicabuntur ergo qui male egerunt et ideo mala dies et aspera ab ipso iudice nuncupatur, ut scias, quia ipse nobis compatitur in euangelio qui compassus est in prophetis.

for the righteous will be crowned, and the righteous man regards his brother’s misery as though it were his own. And who am I to judge of that day on which man will be set among the councils of the angels? Let us hear the sentence of the Lord himself: “The hour will come,” he says, “in which all who are in the tombs will hear the voice of the Son of Man, and those who have done good will come forth to the resurrection of life, those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment.” Those, then, who have done evil will be judged, and therefore the day is called evil and harsh by the Judge himself, so that you may know that he who had compassion in the prophets has compassion on us in the gospel.

Explanation 40, chapter 8

40.8.1CSEL 64:234

Sed etiam sic possumus accipere in die mala, est in tempore malo; mundus enim in malo positus est et ideo mali dies istius mundi et abundat diei malitia sua. non mediocre est, ut hic liberemur ab insidiis peccatoris. qui fuerit hic liber a crimine, ibi erit liber a poena et seueritatem iudicii subire non poterit.

But we can also take “in the evil day” in this way, that is, in an evil time; for the world is set in evil, and therefore the days of this world are evil, and the day has enough evil of its own. It is no small thing that we should be delivered here from the snares of the sinner. He who has been free from crime here will be free from punishment there, and will not have to undergo the severity of judgment.

Explanation 40, chapter 9

40.9.1CSEL 64:234–235

Et ideo uotis opus est et precibus cotidianis et aduocatione principis sacerdotum, de quo dicit Iohannes euangelista: aduocatum habemus ad patrem dominum Iesum, et ipse est deprecatio pro peccatis nostris. hic ergo aduocatus noster et deprecatio pro peccatis totius saeculi orat pro eo, qui intellegit et credit in Christum et dicit: dominus conseruet eum et uiuificet eum et beatum faciat eum. conseruet a periculis, uiuificet tamquam in mortis tenebris constitutum, beatum facere bonorum operum accessione dignetur.

And therefore there is need of vows and daily prayers and of the advocacy of the chief of priests, of whom John the evangelist says: “We have an advocate with the Father, the Lord Jesus, and he is the propitiation for our sins.” This our advocate, then, and propitiation for the sins of the whole world prays for him who understands and believes in Christ, and says: “The Lord preserve him and give him life and make him blessed.” May he preserve him from dangers, give him life as one set in the darkness of death, deign to make him blessed by the addition of good works.

Explanation 40, chapter 10

40.10.1CSEL 64:235

Et emundet, inquit, in terra uitam eius. bene addidit in terra, quia, nisi hic mundatus fuerit, ibi mundus esse non poterit. uel certe hoc modo: emundet in terra; quomodo enim quis mundus in luto, cum terra obliniat? ergo domini manus est necessaria, quae fecit de terra corpus, ut ipsa mundare dignetur.

“And may he cleanse his life on earth,” he says. Rightly he added “on earth”, because unless he has been cleansed here, he cannot be clean there. Or certainly in this way: “may he cleanse on earth”; for how is anyone clean in mud, when earth smears him? So the hand of the Lord is needed, which made the body from earth, that it may deign itself to cleanse it.

Explanation 40, chapter 11

40.11.1CSEL 64:235

Et non tradat eum in manus inimici eius. quis est inimicus nisi leo ille qui circuit rugiens, quaerens quem deuoret? alii habent Graeci: et non tradat eum in animas inimicorum eius. animas pro manibus posuit, eo quod inimicorum animae bonis insidientur et cogitationibus suis iustum conentur euertere. dicuntur et animae pro hominibus: omnes animae septuaginta quae descenderunt in Aegyptum. ideo et Dauid maluit dei se committere potestati quam insidiis inimicorum, qui parcere sua uoluntate nescirent.

“And may he not deliver him into the hands of his enemy.” Who is the enemy but that lion who goes about roaring, seeking whom he may devour? Other Greek copies have: “And may he not deliver him into the souls of his enemies.” It has put “souls” for “hands”, because the souls of enemies lie in wait for the good and try to overthrow the righteous by their designs. “Souls” is also used for men: “All the seventy souls who went down into Egypt.” Therefore David too preferred to commit himself to the power of God rather than to the snares of enemies, who would not know how to spare of their own will.

Explanation 40, chapter 12

40.12.1CSEL 64:235

Sequitur: dominus opem ferat illi supra lectum doloris eius, uniuersum stratum eius uersasti in infirmitate eius. quis est lectus doloris nisi caro infirmitatis? et bene lectus doloris, quia corpus est mortis, de quo se liberari apostolus deprecatur, ut tamquam de tumulo quodam possit assurgere, in quo aegra iacet anima et quasi quodam decumbit in lectulo. Symmachus lectum miseriae dixit, Aquilas grabatum miseriae, expressius Septuaginta uiri lectum doloris putauerunt esse dicendum.

There follows: “May the Lord bring him help upon the bed of his pain; you have turned all his bedding in his sickness.” What is the bed of pain but the flesh of weakness? And rightly the bed of pain, because it is the body of death, from which the apostle prays to be freed, so that he may rise as though from a tomb, in which the sick soul lies and reclines as on a little bed. Symmachus said “bed of misery”, Aquila “pallet of misery”; the Seventy thought more expressly that it should be called “bed of pain”.

40.12.2CSEL 64:235–236

his ergo uersiculis utendum est apud eos, qui diutius infirmitate corporis detinentur, ut habeant medicinam dei,. quo sani esse mereantur. lectus ergo animae caro infirma est, cuius aegritudini anima nostra compatitur, quae si habeat adiutorem dominum, dicit ei: surge, tolle lectum tuum et uade in domum tuam.

These verses, then, should be used with those who are long held by bodily sickness, that they may have the medicine of God by which they may be found worthy to be healed. The bed of the soul, then, is the weak flesh, with whose sickness our soul suffers; and if it has the Lord as helper, he says to it: “Rise, take up your bed and go into your house.”

40.12.3CSEL 64:236

quo confortatus dei uerbo qui aeger erat surgit et tollit lectum suum in quo iacebat et redit in statum pristinum sanitatis. hoc est in domum suam regredi, ut habitet in domicilio robustissimae ualitudinis. qui habitat regit, qui regit uirtutis habet sibi gratiam suffragantem. sed etiam stratum omnem uersat dominus in infirmitate languentis, cui adesse dignatur. quod uersatur, statum mutat aut ex sanitate in aegritudinem aut ex aegritudine ad sanitatem. hic ergo, qui aegrotat, uersat se ad remedium sanitatis.

Strengthened by this word of God, he who was sick rises and takes up the bed on which he lay and returns to his former state of health. This is to go back into his house, so as to dwell in the home of the most robust health. He who dwells rules; he who rules has the grace of virtue supporting him. But the Lord also turns all the bedding in the sickness of the one who languishes, to whom he deigns to be present. What is turned changes its state, either from health to sickness or from sickness to health. So the one who is sick here turns himself toward the remedy of health.

Explanation 40, chapter 13

40.13.1CSEL 64:236

Sic ergo dominus Iesus, etsi uulneratus est propter peccata nostra, tamen non in illa infirmitate permansit, sed se ipse uersauit in melius ad uniuersorum salutem. itaque passione infirmitas est soluta, mors resurrectione. sicut ergo se ipse uersauit ad populorum redemptionem nec sensit aculeum mortis aut uulneris infirmitatem,

So, then, the Lord Jesus, though he was wounded for our sins, yet did not remain in that weakness, but turned himself for the better, for the salvation of all. And so weakness was undone by his passion, death by his resurrection. As, then, he turned himself for the redemption of the peoples and did not feel the sting of death or the weakness of the wound,

40.13.2CSEL 64:236

sic eum, qui in se credit, etsi grauiter aegrotantem, ut a morte liberet, uersat ad uitam. omnem ergo stratum; hoc est uniuersorum hominum infirmitatem in sua infirmitate uersauit. suscepit enim infirmitates omnium in sua carne, erexit se in crucem et uersauit omnium infirmitates in sui corporis infirmitate. unde dicit Esaias: liuore eius nos sanati sumus. habent hoc luctatores, ut se subiciant his quibus congrediuntur atque luctantur, ut opprimi posse uideantur, et subito, cum superati aestimantur elidi, quadam arte se uersant, ut effundant superiorem; cadit qui portabatur et is qui portabat superior inuenitur, ut sternat urgentem.

so he turns toward life the one who believes in him, even when gravely ill, to free him from death. “All the bedding”, then: that is, he turned the weakness of all men in his own weakness. For he took on the weaknesses of all in his flesh, raised himself onto the cross, and turned the weaknesses of all in the weakness of his own body. Hence Isaiah says: “By his bruise we are healed.” Wrestlers have this practice: they put themselves under those with whom they are engaged and wrestling, so that they seem able to be pinned, and suddenly, when they are thought to be overcome and thrown, they turn themselves by a certain art so as to throw off the one on top; the one who was being carried falls, and the one who was carrying is found on top, so as to lay low the one pressing on him.

40.13.3CSEL 64:236–237

spiritali itaque palaestra dominus Iesus onera nostra suscipiens in illa se passionis suae congressione subiecit et infirmitatis specie, ut eum aduersarius hominem parem ceteris iudicaret quem facile posset opprimere, diuinitatis arma deposuit, humanitatis tegmen assumpsit. securus uictoriae propius temptator accessit, in costa eum telo militis uoluit uulnerare, reputans et hunc sicut Adam per costam posse prosterni.

So in the spiritual wrestling-school the Lord Jesus, taking up our burdens, put himself underneath in that bout of his passion, and in the guise of weakness, so that the adversary might judge him a man like the rest whom he could easily pin, he laid aside the arms of divinity and took up the covering of humanity. Sure of victory, the tempter came closer and wished to wound him in the rib with the soldier’s spear, thinking that he too, like Adam, could be laid low through a rib.

40.13.4CSEL 64:237

sed uulneratus latere dominus Iesus uitam produxit e uulnere, euacuauit omne peccatum, deiecit aduersarium, cui mortem latronis eripuit, et in illa morte, in illa sui corporis sepultura, cum aestimaretur oppressus elisus, sua se uirtute uersauit, cecidit aduersarius, dominus resurrexit.

But the Lord Jesus, wounded in the side, brought forth life from the wound, made void all sin, cast down the adversary, from whom he snatched the death of the thief; and in that death, in that burial of his body, when he was thought pinned and thrown, he turned himself by his own power: the adversary fell, the Lord rose again.

Explanation 40, chapter 14

40.14.1CSEL 64:237

Sequitur: ego dixi: domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam quoniam peccaui tibi. potest et ex persona Dauid regis hoc dici, qui uidens in spiritu tantam uictoriam et gratiam Christi petit, ut in illa remissione peccatorum omnium et sui misereatur, quoniam et ipse, si legibus quasi rex non teneretur humanis, deo tamen obnoxium se pro peccatis suis esse cognoscit. confitetur ergo peccatum suum, ut accipiat remissionem et generalis indulgentiae munus inueniat. potest et ex persona saluatoris hoc exprimi, qui nobis misericordiam dei postulat et peccasse se dixit, quia pro nobis peccatum factus est.

There follows: “I said: Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you.” This can also be said in the person of King David, who, seeing in the Spirit so great a victory and grace of Christ, asks that in that forgiveness of all sins he may have mercy on him too; since he himself, even if as king he was not held by human laws, yet knows that he is answerable to God for his sins. He confesses his sin, then, that he may receive forgiveness and find the gift of the general pardon. It can also be expressed in the person of the Saviour, who asks God’s mercy for us and said that he had sinned because he was made sin for us.

40.14.2CSEL 64:237

simul nos docet, cum in aliquo sumus aduersus inimicos dei certamine constituti, ut dei imploremus auxilium, ipsi peccata nostra fateamur et tunc maxime, cum urgemur et terimur, cum dolore et amaritudine nos prosternamus, ne tacuisse uideamur, quo medicina citius nostris uulneribus deferatur, ut sanati aduersario resistamus. quomodo enim potest congredi uulneratus? unde discimus, quia peccatorum nostrorum aculeis uulneramur. uulnus medicum quaerit, medicus confessionem exigit.

At the same time he teaches us that, when we are set in some contest against the enemies of God, we should implore God’s help and ourselves confess our sins, and most of all when we are pressed hard and crushed, we should prostrate ourselves with grief and bitterness, lest we seem to have kept silent, so that medicine may be brought the sooner to our wounds and, healed, we may resist the adversary. For how can a wounded man join battle? From this we learn that we are wounded by the stings of our sins. A wound seeks a physician; the physician demands confession.

Explanation 40, chapter 15

40.15.1CSEL 64:237–238

Hinc quoque magis ac magis aperire saluator sacramentum suae incipit passionis, quod cum euangelio concordare non dubium est. nam maledicebant ei Iudaei, mortem eius expetebant, insidiabantur, urgebant, crescentem cotidie gloriam eius operis non ferentes. hoc ergo prophetia annuntiat, quod in euangelio completum est: inimici mei dixerunt mala mihi: quando morietur et peribit nomen eius?

From here too the Saviour begins to lay open more and more the mystery of his passion, which without doubt agrees with the gospel. For the Jews cursed him, sought his death, laid snares, pressed him, unable to bear the glory of his work, which grew daily. This, then, the prophecy announces, which was fulfilled in the gospel: “My enemies spoke evil against me: When will he die, and his name perish?”

40.15.2CSEL 64:238

amentes, qui uitae auctorem mori posse credebant! sed uota eorum ecclesia destruebat, credens quod etiam mortuus secundum corporis condicionem suum nomen augeret. et ideo psallebat ei dicens: memor ero nominis tui in generatione et generatione, repetebat: unguentum exinanitum est nomen tuum.

Fools, who believed that the author of life could die! But the church was destroying their hopes, believing that even when dead according to the condition of the body he was increasing his name. And therefore it sang to him, saying: “I will remember your name in generation and generation”; it repeated: “Your name is ointment poured out.”

40.15.3CSEL 64:238

monentur illi qui te mori posse praesumunt, non moriar ego quae te noui uitae arbitrum, salutis auctorem. nouimus enim, quod tempore passionis et resurrectionis orabant discipuli congregati, quando eis Magdalena resurrexisse dominum nuntiauit et quando eis clausa ianua dominus se in corpore resurrectionis ostendit, quando Thomas uulnera eius uidit et credidit.

Let those be warned who presume that you can die; I shall not die, I who have known you as the arbiter of life, the author of salvation. For we know that at the time of the passion and resurrection the disciples were gathered in prayer, when Magdalene announced to them that the Lord had risen, and when, with the door shut, the Lord showed himself to them in the body of the resurrection, when Thomas saw his wounds and believed.

40.15.4CSEL 64:238

insultabant ergo Iudaei quasi mortuo, sed dominus uiuentem se apostolis reuelabat. cum ergo dicerent Iudaei: ecce mundus totus post eum abiit, cum dicerent, quia mirabilibus operibus suis seducit populum, quid aliud dicebant nisi: quando morietur et peribit nomen eius? et ideo in eius passione clamabant: tolle tolle a terra talem hunc, crucifigatur crucifigatur. factum est quod petebant, sublatus a terra est, surrexit, ad caelum ascendit et regnum suum de nobis paradisi sedibus reformauit.

The Jews, then, mocked him as one dead, but the Lord was revealing himself alive to the apostles. When the Jews said: “See, the whole world has gone after him”, when they said that he was leading the people astray by his wonderful works, what else were they saying but: “When will he die, and his name perish?” And therefore at his passion they cried out: “Away, away with such a man from the earth; let him be crucified, let him be crucified.” What they asked for came about: he was taken up from the earth, he rose, he ascended to heaven and restored his kingdom from us to the seats of paradise.

Explanation 40, chapter 16

40.16.1CSEL 64:238–239

De Iuda quoque proditore euidens prophetia subtexitur in his uersiculis qui secuntur: et ingrediebatur ut uideret, uana locutus; cor eius congregauit iniquitatem sibi. et egrediebatur foras et loquebatur. sic distinctum Graecis in codicibus inuenimus. ingrediebatur ergo ludas quaerens prodere saluatorem, ut uideret quid ageret quidue loqueretur, ut eum caperet in sermone et Iudaeis annuntiaret; sed nihil inueniebat qui nihil intellegebat.

A clear prophecy about Judas the traitor too is added in the verses that follow: “And he came in to see; he spoke vain things; his heart gathered iniquity to itself. And he went out and spoke.” So we find it divided in the Greek copies. Judas, then, came in seeking to betray the Saviour, to see what he was doing or what he was saying, so as to catch him in his words and report to the Jews; but he who understood nothing found nothing.

40.16.2CSEL 64:239

bene ait scriptura, quia intus cum Iesu non erat qui de doctrina eius recesserat et institutiones eius reliquerat. uolebat intrare, sed penetrare non poterat, quia eum sua excludebat perfidia; omnis enim inpudicus aut auarus aut inmundus, quod est idolorum seruitus, non habet hereditatem in regno Christi et dei. non solum ergo ingredi moliebatur et non ingrediebatur, sed etiam uolebat uidere et non uidebat. denique loquebatur Iesus in parabolis, sed non audiebat ludas.

Scripture rightly says it, because the one who had withdrawn from his teaching and abandoned his instructions was not inside with Jesus. He wanted to enter but could not penetrate, because his faithlessness shut him out; for “every unchaste or covetous or unclean person, which is the service of idols, has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.” So not only was he trying to come in and did not come in, but he also wished to see and did not see. Finally, Jesus spoke in parables, but Judas did not hear.

40.16.3CSEL 64:239

denique diuina non uidebat mysteria; non enim omnes audiunt uerbum dei qui sibi uidentur audire. nam si omnes audirent, non diceret Iesus: qui habet aures audiendi audiat. et ideo, quia non audiebat neque uidere poterat, loquebatur uana pro ueris et putabat quod Iesum falleret dicens: potuit hoc uenundari et dari pauperibus, cum furtis suis, non pauperibus prouideret, appellans rabbi atque doctorem a cuius magisterio deuiabat cuiusque cor, in quod se immiserat, diabolus congregabat sibi et augebat iniquitates.

Finally, he did not see the divine mysteries; for not all hear the word of God who think they hear. For if all heard, Jesus would not say: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.” And therefore, because he did not hear and could not see, he spoke vain things instead of true, and thought that he was deceiving Jesus when he said: “This could have been sold and given to the poor”, though he was providing for his thieving, not for the poor; calling him rabbi and teacher, from whose teaching he was straying, and whose heart, into which he had entered, the devil was gathering to himself and increasing its iniquities.

40.16.4CSEL 64:239–240

sibi enim erat iniquus, sibi iniustus, sibi delinquebat, qui intra se dolum meditabatur qui latere non poterat. non enim circumueniebatur Iesus, qui prodebatur uolens et testificabatur: unus ex uobis tradet me. denique confessus est ludas dicens: numquid ego sum, rabbi? et dominus ait: tu dixisti. nec sic intellexit ludas quod cognosceretur; nam si intellexisset, non prodidisset.

For he was unjust to himself, wicked to himself, sinning against himself, he who was devising within himself a deceit that could not be hidden. For Jesus was not deceived, who was betrayed willingly and testified: “One of you will betray me.” Finally Judas confessed, saying: “Is it I, Rabbi?” And the Lord said: “You have said it.” Not even so did Judas understand that he was known; for if he had understood, he would not have betrayed him.

Explanation 40, chapter 17

40.17.1CSEL 64:240

Sed nihilominus et egrediebatur foras et loquebatur. aptus uersiculus aduersum eos qui secretum alicuius produnt. pulchre ait: egrediebatur foras; foris enim lupi, foris praedones. intus Moyses in nube cum Iesu, foris Iudaei; intus Zacharias sacerdos in templo, foris multitudo; intus spiritus sanctus in cordibus nostris clamat ad patrem, foris aduersarius noster sicut leo peruigilat ad rapinam;

But nonetheless “he went out and spoke”. A fitting verse against those who betray anyone’s secret. Beautifully he says: “He went out”; for outside are the wolves, outside the robbers. Inside is Moses in the cloud with Jesus, outside the Jews; inside is Zechariah the priest in the temple, outside the multitude; inside the Holy Spirit in our hearts cries to the Father, outside our adversary like a lion keeps watch for prey;

40.17.2CSEL 64:240

foris infideles, intus fideles. et ideo eos qui foris sunt deus iudicabit, eos autem qui intus sunt Christus absoluet. egrediebatur igitur ludas et loquebatur. egrediebatur de fide, egrediebatur de consilio et numero apostolorum, egrediebatur de conuiuio Christi ad latrocinium diaboli, egrediebatur de gratia sanctificationis ad laqueum mortis, qui uana ad perfidos loquebatur,

outside are the unbelievers, inside the faithful. And therefore God will judge those who are outside, but Christ will absolve those who are inside. Judas, then, went out and spoke. He went out from faith, he went out from the council and number of the apostles, he went out from Christ’s supper to the devil’s brigandage, he went out from the grace of sanctification into the snare of death, he who spoke vain things to the faithless;

40.17.3CSEL 64:240

egrediebatur foras, qui uitae interna mysteria relinquebat, egrediebatur, qui scripturae interiora non nouerat. si enim scisset, intellexisset dicentem: numquid qui dormit non adiciet ut resurgat? intellexisset etiam illud: tu uero, homo unanimis, dux meus et notus meus, qui semper mecum dulces capiebas cibos, in domo domini ambulauimus cum consensu. non intellexit ergo hunc psalmum, non centesimum atque octauum, non alios, non alia testimonia scripturarum. de quo bene euangelista dicit Iohannes et ceteris infidelibus: ex nobis exierunt, sed non erant ex nobis; si enim ex nobis fuissent, nobiscum mansissent.

he went outside, who left behind the inner mysteries of life; he went out, who did not know the inner meaning of Scripture. For if he had known it, he would have understood the one who says: “Will he who sleeps not rise again?” He would also have understood this: “But you, a man of one mind with me, my guide and my familiar friend, who always took sweet food with me; in the house of the Lord we walked in harmony.” So he did not understand this psalm, nor the hundred and eighth, nor others, nor other testimonies of the Scriptures. Of him and the other unbelievers John the evangelist rightly says: “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us.”

Explanation 40, chapter 18

40.18.1CSEL 64:240–241

Non manebat ergo cum apostolis proditor, qui foras exiebat et cum perfidis susurrabat. quo uerbo usa est scriptura diuina demonstrans sine auctoritate esse perfidiam, quae timet quod loquitur deprehendi. fideli autem dicitur: exalta uiribus uocem tuam. en quo deciderat apostolus ludas, qui missus erat fidem gentibus pleno auctoritatis praeconio praedicare, ut in aurem insusurraret insidiatoribus magistri sui quod timeret audiri. nonne iudicio suo se ipse damnauit?

So the traitor did not remain with the apostles, he who went outside and whispered with the faithless. Divine Scripture used that word to show that faithlessness is without authority, since it fears that what it says will be found out. But to the faithful it is said: “Lift up your voice with strength.” See to what the apostle Judas had fallen, who had been sent to preach the faith to the gentiles with the full authority of a herald: to whisper into the ear of his master’s plotters what he feared to have heard. Did he not condemn himself by his own judgment?

40.18.2CSEL 64:241

sed erubescebat audiri quod facere non timebat; erubescebat, quia aduersus uitae suae: sanctificationis et honoris auctorem cogitabat mala nec gratiam beneficiis rependebat, sed mala pro bonis bono referebat magistro, quod etiam saeculi homines damnare consuerunt; erubescebat ingratus deprehendi, erubescebat auarus uideri, cum pro pecunia auctoris sui salutem proderet; erubescebat uideri perfidus.

But he was ashamed to have heard what he was not afraid to do; he was ashamed, because he was planning evil against the author of his life, his sanctification and his honour, and did not repay his benefits with gratitude, but returned evil for good to a good master — a thing even men of the world are accustomed to condemn; the ungrateful man was ashamed to be found out, the avaricious man was ashamed to be seen, since for money he was betraying the salvation of his author; he was ashamed to be seen as faithless.

40.18.3CSEL 64:241

similiter et Iudaei, qui aduersus fidei magistrum falsos testes perfidi subornabant, ut dicerent, eo quod praedicasset templum dei quod Salomon condidit destruendum, cum ille de templo sui corporis significasset: soluite hoc templum, et in triduo suscitabo illud, uere foris erant, qui a cognitione erant uerbi caelestis exclusi.

Likewise the Jews too, who faithlessly suborned false witnesses against the teacher of the faith, to say that he had preached that the temple of God which Solomon built was to be destroyed, when he had signified the temple of his body: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” — they were truly outside, who were shut out from the knowledge of the heavenly word.

Explanation 40, chapter 19

40.19.1CSEL 64:241

Uerbum, inquit, iniquum proposuerunt aduersum me, id est: inlicitum et contra ius et fas sermonem proposuerunt mihi, facientes de humano sanguine pactiones, quem sceleratissime uendidit ludas, Iudaei quoque emendum non minore scelere crediderunt, uanissimi homines, quasi, qui dormiat, num quid non adiciat ut resurgat. quid sit adiectio. consideremus.

“An unjust word,” he says, “they set forth against me”, that is: they set forth against me an unlawful word, contrary to right and justice, making bargains over human blood, which Judas most wickedly sold and which the Jews with no lesser wickedness thought fit to buy — most vain men, as though he who sleeps would not rise again. What the “adding” is, let us consider.

Explanation 40, chapter 20

40.20.1CSEL 64:241–242

Naturale est omnibus terrenis animantibus et uolatilibus caeli et piscibus maris nasci et mori; homini, quem pretiosiorem ceteris terrae animantibus deus fecerat, hanc praecipue contulit gratiam, ut mortuus reuiuescat. haec dicitur ad renouationem uitae superioris adiectio. denique et Ezechiae regi cum praescripsisset dominus, quod uitae suae tempus implesset, et per Esaiam mandasset, ut ordinaret domum suam, quia moriturus esset, atque ille orasset ad dominum et fleuisset fletu magno, miseratus dominus mandauit ei:

It is natural to all earthly animals and to the birds of the sky and the fishes of the sea to be born and to die; to man, whom God had made more precious than the other animals of the earth, he gave this grace above all, that when dead he should live again. This is called the “adding” for the renewal of the former life. So too, when the Lord had decreed for King Hezekiah that he had completed the time of his life, and had commanded him through Isaiah to set his house in order, because he was going to die, and he had prayed to the Lord and wept with great weeping, the Lord took pity and sent word to him:

40.20.2CSEL 64:242

ecce adicio ad tempus tuum annos quindecim. et alibi Dauid sanctus ait: dies super dies regis adicies annos eius. inuentum ergo homini quod addatur, deo autem addi nihil potest, quia scriptum est: non est adicere neque minuere in quo perfecta et plena sunt omnia. etsi Christus resurrexit, utique in eo quod assumpserat resurrexit, in quo plenitudini diuinitatis eius nihil uel decedere potuit uel accedere. deus enim incorporeus et

“See, I add fifteen years to your time.” And elsewhere holy David says: “Days upon days of the king; you will add to his years.” Something, then, is found that may be added to man; but nothing can be added to God, because it is written: “There is no adding or taking away” in him in whom all things are perfect and full. Even if Christ rose again, he certainly rose in what he had assumed, in which nothing could either go from or come to the fullness of his Godhead. For God is incorporeal and

40.20.3CSEL 64:242

inmortalis est, cuius summa natura et plenitudo uirtutum sine ulla carnis accessione signatur. caro autem dispensationis in Christo est, quam miserationis titulo et pietatis iure suscepit, ut captiuam redimeret, ablueret contaminatam, mortuam resuscitaret. et pulchre ait:numquid qui dormit non adiciet ut resurgat? non dixit non adicitur, sed non adiciet ut resurgat, eo quod ipse se dei filius resuscitauit, sicut supra diximus dixisse eum Iudaeis:

immortal, whose highest nature and fullness of powers is marked without any addition of flesh. But the flesh in Christ belongs to the dispensation, which he took on by the title of compassion and by the right of mercy, to redeem it as a captive, to wash it when defiled, to raise it when dead. And beautifully he says: “Will he who sleeps not add so as to rise again?” He did not say “will it not be added”, but “will he not add so as to rise again”, because the Son of God raised himself, as we said above that he said to the Jews:

40.20.4CSEL 64:242

soluite hoc templum, et in triduo suscitabo illud. adiectionem accepit caro quasi sumpta de homine, suscepta de uirgine, sed quasi deus adiectionem ipsam operatus est, qui uirtute propria resurrexit, ut esset suae resurrectionis operator. cum legas, quod et pater filium et filius ipse se resuscitauerit, agnosce operationem illam diuinae fuisse uirtutis, quia patri et filio una uirtus, communis operatio, quandoquidem una atque eadem substantia trinitatis est.

“Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” The flesh received the adding, as taken from man, assumed from the Virgin; but as God he himself worked the adding, who rose by his own power, so that he was the worker of his own resurrection. When you read that both the Father raised the Son and the Son raised himself, recognize that that work was of divine power, because the Father and the Son have one power, a common work, since the substance of the Trinity is one and the same.

Explanation 40, chapter 21

40.21.1CSEL 64:242–243

Sed quid ego ceteros arguo? dicit dominus Iesus; quid mirum si populus me non cognouit et cruci adiudicauit, cum apostolus meus mercedem proditionis exegerit, cum conuiua meus mortem meam uendiderit? etenim homo pacis meae, in quem speraui, qui edebat panes meos, ampliauit super me supplantationem. aliqui ludam excusandum putant, quia refudit pecuniam quam pro mercede emptionis acceperat.

“But why do I accuse the others?” says the Lord Jesus. “What wonder if the people did not know me and condemned me to the cross, when my apostle demanded the price of betrayal, when my table companion sold my death?” “For the man of my peace, in whom I hoped, who ate my bread, has magnified his tripping up against me.” Some think that Judas is to be excused, because he paid back the money which he had received as the price of the sale.

40.21.2CSEL 64:243

sed ecce quia ultra Iudaeorum condemnatur infidelitatem; cui enim plus datum est, plus exigitur ab eo. quid, inquit, de aliis querar? homo pacis meae, Cui pacem meam dederam, pacem meam relinquere uolueram, persecutoribus deductis me tradidit et fefellit me in quem speraui. numquid ignorauit proditorem sui futurum, de quo ante praedixit: unus ex uobis me tradet?

But see, he is condemned beyond the unbelief of the Jews; for from him to whom more has been given, more is required. “Why,” he says, “should I complain of the others? The man of my peace, to whom I had given my peace, to whom I had wished to leave my peace, led the persecutors and betrayed me, and deceived me, in whom I hoped.” Was he ignorant that he would be his betrayer, of whom he had foretold: “One of you will betray me”?

40.21.3CSEL 64:243

[hoc autem dicebat de luda, sicut scriptum est in euangelio.] non utique. sed quo amplius condemnaret eum, de fide eius sperasse se dixit. Aquilas confisus eram dixit, Symmachus posuit confidebam. plus enim grauamus eum in quo plurimum spei uel fiduciae habuisse nos dicimus, si postea spem nostram opinionemque destituit.

Certainly not. But to condemn him the more, he said that he had hoped in his faithfulness. Aquila said “I had trusted”, Symmachus put “I was trusting”. For we weigh more heavily against the one in whom we say we had very much hope or confidence, if afterwards he has disappointed our hope and opinion.

Explanation 40, chapter 22

40.22.1CSEL 64:243

Simul ostendit, quanta uis diuinae sanctificationis sit, quae excludat malitiam et deprauatum emendet ingenium, si forma propositi melioris accedat. quantos scimus esse conuersos! mutatus est Zachaeus ille publicanus et ad quaestum auaro intentus affectu, qui postea quadrupla redhibitione soluit errorem, condemnauit in se auaritiam, temporis superioris abiurauit lucra, compensauit in paupere, si deesset exactor.

At the same time he shows how great is the power of divine sanctification, which shuts out malice and corrects a depraved character, if the pattern of a better purpose comes in. How many we know to have been converted! Zacchaeus, that tax collector, intent on gain with an avaricious disposition, was changed; afterwards he paid for his error by fourfold restitution, condemned avarice in himself, forswore the gains of his former time, made it up to the poor if the one he had exacted from was not there.

40.22.2CSEL 64:243

latro ipse nequitiam suam proposito meliore mutauit, agnouit in cruce Christum, confessus est dei filium, regem uoce propria nuncupauit. quo tempore iusti plerique nutabant, ipsi certe latebant apostoli, carnifex ipse Centurio non negauit. quid de tempore euangelii loquor?

The thief himself changed his wickedness with a better purpose, recognized Christ on the cross, confessed the Son of God, and called him king with his own voice. At a time when many of the righteous were wavering, and the apostles themselves certainly lay hidden, the executioner himself, the centurion, did not deny him. Why do I speak of the time of the gospel?

40.22.3CSEL 64:243–244

Raab meretrix erat, quae perfidiae atque intemperantiae se alebat stipendiis?. tamen ubi exploratores uidit, quos miserat Iesus Naue, fidem induit et periculo imminente iustitiam reseruauit nec susceptos prodidit, sed fideli humanitate protexit. ideo ergo sperasse se dicit, quasi iure praesumpserit, ut apostolus superiora deponeret, meliora sequeretur

Rahab was a harlot, who fed herself on the wages of faithlessness and intemperance. Yet when she saw the spies whom Jesus son of Nave had sent, she put on faith, kept righteousness when danger threatened, and did not betray those she had received, but protected them with faithful kindness. Therefore, then, he says that he had hoped, as though he had rightly presumed that the apostle would put off his former ways and follow better ones,

40.22.4CSEL 64:244

et, qui sanctificandi alios munus acceperat, ipse in se sanctitatis gratiam custodiret et sinceritatis inhaereret officiis. bene ait speraui, quia homini dedit eligendi arbitrium, quid sequatur. posui, inquit, ante te bonum et malum. si malum elegeris, non natura delinquit, sed eligentis affectus. si unusquisque hominum condemnatur qui malum elegerit, quid de Iuda dicimus, qui prodidit eum cui copulabatur suauitate conuiuii?

and that he who had received the office of sanctifying others would himself keep the grace of holiness in himself and cleave to the duties of sincerity. Rightly he says “I hoped”, because he gave man the power to choose what he will follow. “I have set before you,” he says, “good and evil.” If you choose evil, it is not nature that sins but the disposition of the one choosing. If every man who chooses evil is condemned, what shall we say of Judas, who betrayed him to whom he was joined in the sweetness of the shared table?

Explanation 40, chapter 23

40.23.1CSEL 64:244

Qui edebat, inquit, panes meos, ampliauit super me subplantationem. quid est quod addidit panes meos? potuit dicere: qui edebat panes mecum, nisi illam intellegas, quae specialis est Christi, hoc est uerbi caelestis alimoniam; non enim in solo pane uiuit homo, sed in omni uerbo dei.

“He who ate my bread,” he says, “has magnified his tripping up against me.” Why did he add “my bread”? He could have said “he who ate bread with me”, unless you are to understand that food which is Christ’s own, that is, the nourishment of the heavenly word; for man does not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

40.23.2CSEL 64:244

denique alibi dicit: qui semper mecum dulces capiebas cibos. quibus uersiculis bene utimur aduersum eos, qui necandos esse crediderint cum quibus uidentur epulati. gentiles hoc custodire memorantur, hostes plerumque, latrones etiam, ut parcant his cum quibus recumbunt. [ipsa pabulorum societate mitescunt unde propter huiusmodi

Finally elsewhere he says: “You who always took sweet food with me.” We rightly use these verses against those who have thought that those with whom they are seen to have feasted may be killed. The gentiles are said to observe this, enemies very often, even robbers: that they spare those with whom they recline at table. They grow gentle through the very fellowship of food. Hence, because of such a feeling

40.23.3CSEL 64:244–245

affectum gratiae conuiualis, si uerba consideremus, non otiose dulces cibos dixit. quomodo enim dulces qui cito corrumpuntur? sed uide ne dulces cibos dixerit uerba uitae; hos enim cibos nulla amaritudo corrumpit,, nulla mortis corruptela contaminat. unde et semper dixit. non enim semper edere quis poterit, semper autem uerbo dei possumus inhaerere et noctibus et diebus, si in lege dei die et nocte meditemur.

of the grace of the shared table, if we consider the words, he did not idly say “sweet food”. For how are foods sweet which quickly spoil? But see whether by sweet food he did not mean the words of life; for no bitterness spoils these foods, no corruption of death defiles them. That is why he also said “always”. For no one can always be eating, but we can always cleave to the word of God, nights and days, if we meditate on the law of God day and night.

Explanation 40, chapter 24

40.24.1CSEL 64:245

Quid est etiam ampliauit? Graecus ἐμεγάλυνεν dixit, hoc est magnificauit. utrumque nobis exposuit dominus quod mouere nos posset, dicens in euangelio: qui manducat mecum panem leuauit super me calcaneum. unde assumptus hic sermo sit, consideremus: fuimus, inquit, increduli, errantes, seruientes desideriis et uoluptatibus. fateamur errorem, ut diluamur. et ego uidi aliquem puer athletam, cum elisisset aduersarium, frontem ei percussisse calcaneo, quod signi fuit, eo quod insultauerit uicto.

And what is “has magnified”? The Greek said emegalynen, that is, “has made great”. The Lord explained to us both words that might trouble us, saying in the gospel: “He who eats bread with me has lifted up his heel against me.” Let us consider where this expression is taken from. “We were,” he says, “unbelieving, going astray, serving desires and pleasures.” Let us confess our error, that we may be washed. I too as a boy saw an athlete who, when he had thrown his opponent, struck his forehead with his heel, which was a sign that he was insulting the vanquished.

40.24.2CSEL 64:245

hoc est quod ait: magnificauit super me subplantationem, quo uerbo insultantis iactantiam declarauit. leuauit ergo et ludas super Christum calcaneum suum, cum proderet eum, sed non leuauit inpune. adhuc Adam calcaneum leuat quod a serpente est uulneratum. et utique ei pedes lauerat Christus, audierat dicentem: qui lotus est non indiget nisi ut pedes lauet, sed est mundus totus. sed quod lauit gratia, inquinauerat perfidia. ludas ergo calcaneum leuauit ad uulnus. uere non tenuit caput qui calcaneum super Christum leuauit.

That is what he says: “He has magnified his tripping up against me”, by which word he declared the boasting of one who insults. Judas, then, also lifted his heel against Christ when he betrayed him, but he did not lift it with impunity. Adam still lifts the heel that was wounded by the serpent. And surely Christ had washed his feet; he had heard him saying: “He who has been washed needs only to wash his feet, but is clean all over.” But what grace had washed, faithlessness had defiled. Judas, then, lifted his heel to his own wounding. Truly he did not hold to the head, who lifted his heel against Christ.

40.24.3CSEL 64:245

-Adam super se leuauit, hic super Christum, et ideo eum serpens grauius quam ceteros uulnerauit. leuauit calcaneum suum qui fraudulentum osculum porrigebat, quo subplantaret auctorem, ideoque scriptum est in propheta: ampliauit super me subplantationem. Esau quoque ait de fratre suo: bis me iam subplantauit. qui subplantat, dolum facit, quo aduersarium elidit aut uulnerat. ideo et ludas subplantasse dicitur, quia osculo suo uulnus infixit, quo inuadendi saluatoris signum persecutoribus demonstrauit.

Adam lifted it against himself, this man against Christ, and therefore the serpent wounded him more gravely than the rest. He lifted his heel who offered the deceitful kiss by which to trip up his author, and therefore it is written in the prophet: “He has magnified his tripping up against me.” Esau too said of his brother: “He has tripped me up twice now.” He who trips up uses a trick to throw or wound his opponent. Therefore Judas too is said to have tripped him up, because by his kiss he inflicted a wound, and by it showed the persecutors the sign for seizing the Saviour.

40.24.4CSEL 64:245–246

subplantauit ergo quasi serpens, qui suo ore uenenum infundit et uulnerat dente calcaneum; et hic enim non diuinitatem Christi, sed corporis extremum calcaneum uulnerauit. leuauit etiam ludas calcaneum quasi luctator insolens et superbus, in quo caput percuteret saluatoris. sed caput Christi ferire non potuit, quia caput Christi deus. suum sane caput informis laquei nodo ligauit, ut remedium sibi salutis auferret.

He tripped him up, then, like a serpent, which pours in poison with its mouth and wounds the heel with its tooth; for here too he wounded not the divinity of Christ but the lowest part of the body, the heel. Judas also lifted his heel like an insolent and proud wrestler, with which to strike the Saviour’s head. But he could not strike the head of Christ, because the head of Christ is God. Indeed he bound his own head with the knot of a shameful noose, so as to take from himself the remedy of salvation.

Explanation 40, chapter 25

40.25.1CSEL 64:246

Uide si pie potes illud aptare, quod in Genesi dixit sanctus patriarcha Iacob, cum de filiis prophetaret: Dan iudicabit populum suum tamquam unam tribum in Israel, et: fiat Dan sicut serpens sedens in uia et in semita, mordens calcaneum equi, et

See whether you can piously apply here what the holy patriarch Jacob said in Genesis when he prophesied about his sons: “Dan will judge his people like one tribe in Israel”, and: “Let Dan be like a serpent sitting in the way and in the path, biting the horse’s heel, and

40.25.2CSEL 64:246

cadet eques retrorsum salutem expectans a domino. legimus quidem, quod Samson de tribu Dan iudex fuerit in Israel, sed alius hic significatur futurus, qui ex ea tribu progressus populum suppliciis sacrilegae impietatis affliget, antichristus ille

the rider will fall backward, awaiting salvation from the Lord.” We read indeed that Samson of the tribe of Dan was a judge in Israel; but here another is signified as to come, who, coming forth from that tribe, will afflict the people with the torments of sacrilegious impiety: that Antichrist

40.25.3CSEL 64:246

qui sedebit in templo tamquam sit deus, uere iudicium, quod habet interpretatio; Dan enim iudicium significatur. et pulchre dixit, quia populum suum iudicabit, qui perpetuae poenae fiet obnoxius; qui enim non credit iam iudicatus est, qui autem credit non iudicabitur, quia credit in dei filium suae animae redemptorem. et ideo tamquam iudicii liber dicit: qui diiudicat me dominus est. iudicaturus est ergo populum impietatis, non plebem fidei; illi enim iudicantur qui cadunt ruina perfidiae, non qui resurgunt fidei libertate.

who will sit in the temple as though he were God — truly judgment, as the interpretation has it; for Dan means “judgment”. And beautifully he said that he will judge his people, he who will become liable to everlasting punishment; for he who does not believe has already been judged, but he who believes will not be judged, because he believes in the Son of God, the redeemer of his soul. And therefore, as one free of judgment, he says: “He who judges me is the Lord.” He is to judge, then, the people of impiety, not the people of faith; for those are judged who fall in the ruin of faithlessness, not those who rise in the freedom of faith.

Explanation 40, chapter 26

40.26.1CSEL 64:246–247

Sedebit igitur in uia et insidiabitur in semita sicut serpens, ut uulneret transeuntes et mordeat equi nostri calcaneum; animam enim fidelium non poterit uulnerare. in qua autem uia sedebit et in qua semita nisi ex quibus Christus dominus, ut legimus, nationum populum uocauit ad cenam suam dicens: exi in uias et circa saepes et compelle ut intrent, ut impleatur domus mea?

He will sit, then, in the way and lie in wait in the path like a serpent, to wound those who pass by and to bite the heel of our horse; for he will not be able to wound the soul of the faithful. And in what way will he sit, and in what path, unless those from which Christ the Lord, as we read, called the people of the nations to his supper, saying: “Go out into the ways and along the hedges and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled”?

40.26.2CSEL 64:247

et quia similiter ludas amplificasse super Christum legitur subplantationem, uidetur hoc loco ipse signari, quod mordere haberet calcaneum equi quo Christus dominus uehebatur. unde dictum est: equitatus tuus salus, quod caro eius mundi totius erat susceptura peccatum, ut salus pro exitio et uita aeterna pro morte succederet.

And since likewise Judas is read to have magnified his tripping up against Christ, he himself seems to be signified in this place, as one who was to bite the heel of the horse on which Christ the Lord was carried. Hence it was said: “Your horsemanship is salvation”, because his flesh was to take up the sin of the whole world, so that salvation might follow instead of destruction and eternal life instead of death.

40.26.3CSEL 64:247

uulneratus est ergo equus non mendax solus ad salutem, uulneratus est equus qui mundi totius peccata suscepit et onera nostra portauit et non fuit fatigatus, uulneratus est equus qui ad furorem concubitus adhinnire nesciuit. et ideo fortassis Iohanni euangelistae caelum apertum et albus equus est demonstratus, super quem sedebat habens in capite diademata et in femore suo nomen scriptum: rex regum et dominus dominantium. albus erat qui erat inmaculatus, qui nulla peccati inquinamenta cognouerat. nam si libido tenebrosa est, recte sanctimonia relucet et splendet.

So the horse was wounded, not the horse that is vain for safety; the horse was wounded that took up the sins of the whole world and bore our burdens and was not wearied; the horse was wounded that did not know how to neigh in the frenzy of lust. And therefore perhaps to John the evangelist heaven was shown opened and a white horse, on which sat one with diadems on his head and on his thigh a name written: King of kings and Lord of lords. He was white who was spotless, who had known no defilements of sin. For if lust is dark, rightly holiness shines and gleams.

40.26.4CSEL 64:247

hic ergo equus est uulneratus, sed non retardatus. denique cum ipso uulnere de tumulo resurrexit, cucurrit ad caelum supra omnes angelos et archangelos, uelocior omni equitatu militiae caelestis inuentus, supra equos etiam illos igneos de quibus Helias raptus est. et merito uelocior, qui super omnes caelos et supra caelum caelorum ad sedem dei omnipotentis ascendit et sedet, ut scriptura nos docuit dicens: uidebitis abhinc filium hominis sedentem ad dexteram uirtutis.

This horse, then, was wounded but not slowed. Finally, with that very wound he rose from the tomb, ran to heaven above all angels and archangels, found swifter than all the cavalry of the heavenly army, above even those horses of fire by which Elijah was carried off. And rightly swifter, who ascended above all the heavens and above the heaven of heavens to the seat of God almighty and sits there, as Scripture has taught us, saying: “From now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power.”

Explanation 40, chapter 27

40.27.1CSEL 64:247–248

Hic itaque equus in figura et ante est demonstratus tempore Machabaeorum, quem sedebat dux ille militiae caelestis aureis armis refulgens, qui Heliodorum depeculatorem illum depositi uidualis ceterorumque, quae sacrae fuerant commendata custodiae, strauit perculit et postea exoratus Oniae precibus sacerdotis

This horse, then, was shown beforehand in a figure too, in the time of the Maccabees, on which sat that leader of the heavenly army, gleaming in golden armour, who threw down and struck Heliodorus, the plunderer of the widows’ deposit and of the other things that had been entrusted to sacred keeping, and afterwards, entreated by the prayers of Onias the priest,

40.27.2CSEL 64:248

uitali usui reformauit. unde uere in eo arma aurea refulserunt, quia solus equum hunc sedit et uicit in quo nullus culpae immunis euasit, non Enoch, qui raptus est, ne malitia mutaret cor eius, non Abraham, non Isaac, non Iacob, non Moyses. omnes enim sub peccato, omnes sub morte. denique regnauit mors ab Adam usque ad Moyse. solus iste est qui peccatum non fecit, solus est Christus qui peccatum abstulit mundi, qui dixit morti: ubi est, mors, uictoria tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus?

restored him to the use of life. Hence truly golden armour gleamed on him, because he alone sat this horse and conquered, the horse on which no one escaped free of guilt: not Enoch, who was carried off lest wickedness should change his heart, not Abraham, not Isaac, not Jacob, not Moses. For all are under sin, all under death. Finally, death reigned from Adam to Moses. He alone is the one who did no sin; Christ alone is he who took away the sin of the world, who said to death: “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?”

Explanation 40, chapter 28

40.28.1CSEL 64:248

Quomodo ergo amplificauit super hunc subplantationem suam ludas et cecidit eques retrorsum? quod in Iuda est, dolum fecit, quod in Christo, uolens passus est. saepe uidemus fortiorem uelle percuti, ut acrior lacessitus insurgat, uehementius excitetur. momordit ergo serpens calcaneum equi, uirus suae fraudis euomuit;

How, then, did Judas magnify his tripping up against him, and the rider fall backward? What was in Judas was a trick; what was in Christ was willing suffering. We often see the stronger man willing to be struck, so that, being provoked, he may rise up the more fiercely and be roused more vehemently. So the serpent bit the horse’s heel and spewed out the venom of its deceit;

40.28.2CSEL 64:248

uolens eques se ipse deiecit, uolens cecidit, ut nos leuaret. quid est tamen quod ait scriptura: et cadet eques retrorsum? cur retrorsum nisi ut retro regeret se sequentes? retrorsum erat Petrus, cui dixit: uade retro post me, retro erant apostoli et ceteri discipuli. ideo retrorsum cecidit, quia super quos cadit saluat. omnis enim qui super hunc lapidem, inquit, ceciderit, conquassabitur, supra quem ceciderit autem, mundabit eum.

the rider willingly threw himself down; willingly he fell, to raise us. Yet why does Scripture say: “And the rider will fall backward”? Why backward, unless so as to guide from behind those who follow him? Peter was behind, to whom he said: “Go back behind me”; the apostles and the other disciples were behind. Therefore he fell backward, because he saves those on whom he falls. For “everyone,” he says, “who falls on this stone will be broken, but on whomever it falls, it will cleanse him.”

40.28.3CSEL 64:248

alii habent: uentilabit eum, alii: comminuet. qui enim uentilat frugem, mundat a paleis, qui comminuit aliquid, in puluerem redigit, ut mollitia pulueris uel poculo salubri uel reliquo medicinae proficiat. unde colligimus cauendum, ne quis semel per baptismum susceptus a Christo ex eius deerret corpore, hoc est excutiatur ab ecclesia;

Others have “it will winnow him”, others “it will crush him”. For he who winnows grain cleans it of chaff; he who crushes something reduces it to powder, so that the softness of the powder may be of use either in a healthful drink or in some other medicine. From this we gather that we must take care that no one who has once been received by Christ through baptism should stray from his body, that is, be shaken out of the church;

40.28.4CSEL 64:248–249

ipsa est enim mortis ruina perpetuae. Illum autem, qui uenit crediturus in Christum, ut eum mors eius inueniat, crux eius assumat, clauus infigat, sanguis infundat, sepultura quoque eius inuoluat,. gratia resurrectionis attollat, de somno suscitet, a morte uiuificet, illum, inquam, a saeculo liberat, a peccato mundat, sanat a uulnere, a duritia impietatis inflectit, ad mansuetudinem pietatis emollit, ut circumciso corde suauem illum et inconprehensibilem hauriat spiritum, bibat poculum salutis aeternae. cecidit ergo eques retrorsum.

for that is the ruin of everlasting death. But the one who comes to believe in Christ, so that his death may find him, his cross take him up, his nail pierce him, his blood pour into him, his burial too enfold him, the grace of the resurrection lift him up, raise him from sleep, give him life from death — that one, I say, he frees from the world, cleanses from sin, heals of his wound, bends from the hardness of impiety, softens to the gentleness of piety, so that with circumcised heart he may draw in that sweet and incomprehensible Spirit and drink the cup of eternal salvation. So “the rider fell backward”.

Explanation 40, chapter 29

40.29.1CSEL 64:249

Accipe et aliud, cur retrorsum cecidit. post ipsum omnes, nemo ante ipsum. cecidit ergo non sibi, sed omnibus, ut duritiam cordis nostri super nos cadendo molliret. cecidit super Adam, quem quaerebat, ut inueniret. retro eum quaesiuit, ut supra umeros suos bonus pastor inponeret secumque paradiso in illius redemptione latronis inueheret.

Take also another reason why he fell backward. After him come all, no one before him. He fell, then, not for himself but for all, so that by falling upon us he might soften the hardness of our heart. He fell upon Adam, whom he was seeking, in order to find him. He sought him behind, so that as the good shepherd he might put him on his shoulders and carry him with himself into paradise in the redemption of that thief.

Explanation 40, chapter 30

40.30.1CSEL 64:249

Sed forte dicas: et persecutores ceciderunt retrorsum; sic enim scriptum est, quia principes sacerdotum, quos adduxerat proditor ludas, et ceteri, qui ad comprehendendum aduenerant dominum Iesum, abierunt retrorsum et ceciderunt in terram. hoc est quod et ego dico, quia super peccatores uoluit cadere, non super iustos; iustus enim medico non indiget, sed peccatores. si apostolorum umbra sanabat, quanto magis caro Christi quos tangit a morte defendit!

But perhaps you say: the persecutors too fell backward; for so it is written, that the chief priests, whom Judas the traitor had brought, and the others who had come to seize the Lord Jesus, went backward and fell to the ground. That is just what I too say: that he willed to fall upon sinners, not upon the righteous; for the righteous man does not need a physician, but sinners do. If the shadow of the apostles healed, how much more does the flesh of Christ defend from death those it touches!

40.30.2CSEL 64:249

denique leprosum tetigit et sine dilatone mundauit. ut scias autem qui legis, quia et persecutores suos uoluit liberare, testem Christi interroga. nam cum inueheretur Petrus in Iudaeos, quod principem uitae interfecissent, remedium demonstrauit, ut agerent paenitentiam et remitti sibi peccatum quod admiserant mererentur. quid autem dubitas, quod ideo cecidit, ut resuscitaret, cum ipse dixerit: per cut i do met sanabo a b o? uerborum tamen uideto distantiam.

Finally, he touched the leper and cleansed him without delay. And so that you who read may know that he willed to free even his persecutors, ask Christ’s witness. For when Peter inveighed against the Jews because they had killed the prince of life, he showed them the remedy: that they should repent and be found worthy to have the sin they had committed forgiven. Why do you doubt that he fell for this purpose, to raise up, since he himself said: “I will strike and I will heal”? Yet note the difference of the words.

40.30.3CSEL 64:249–250

in Genesi habet: cadet eques retrorsum salutem expectans a domino, hoc est ut oculos non auertat a deo, mentem propriam non reflectat, resurrectionis suae praerogatiuam uindicet et diuina se resuscitet potestate. hic autem habet: abierunt retrorsum et ceciderunt in terram. qui terrenus est in terram cadit, qui caelestis caelo inhaeret. etsi corpore cadit, uirtute non cadit, sed quae sursum sunt semper intendit; semper enim ad patrem respicit, ut eius circa nos impleat uoluntatem.

In Genesis it has: “The rider will fall backward, awaiting salvation from the Lord”, that is, so that he does not turn his eyes away from God, does not turn his mind back, claims the prerogative of his resurrection, and raises himself by divine power. But here it has: “They went backward and fell to the ground.” He who is earthly falls to the earth; he who is heavenly clings to heaven. Even if he falls in the body, he does not fall in power, but always aims at the things above; for he always looks to the Father, to fulfil his will toward us.

40.30.4CSEL 64:250

utinam et isti non abissent retrorsum, sed Christum excepissent, sicut excepit Ioseph et sepeliuit eum in monumento nouo! qui fidelis est in terram non cadit, qui infidelis cadit et descendit in inferiora terrarum, sicut scriptum est: descendant in infernum uiuentes. ergo persecutor super terram et in infernum cadit, Christus super resurrecturos, Christus super petram, Christus super ecclesiam. audi quomodo super ecclesiam cadat. retro erat

Would that they too had not gone backward, but had received Christ, as Joseph received him and buried him in a new tomb! He who is faithful does not fall to the earth; he who is unfaithful falls and goes down into the lower parts of the earth, as it is written: “Let them go down alive into hell.” So the persecutor falls on the earth and into hell; Christ falls upon those who will rise again, Christ upon the rock, Christ upon the church. Hear how he falls upon the church. Peter was behind

40.30.5CSEL 64:250

Petrus et sequebatur eum, cum a Iudaeis ad Caiphae domum synagogae principis duceretur. ipse est Petrus cui dixit: tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam. ubi Petrus, ibi ergo ecclesia, ubi ecclesia, ibi nulla mors, sed uita aeterna. et ideo addidit: et portae inferi non praeualebunt ei, et tibi dabo claues regni caelorum. beatus Petrus, cui non inferorum porta praeualuit, non caeli porta se clausit, sed e contrario destruxit inferni uestibula, patefecit caelestia. in terris itaque positus caelum aperuit, inferos clausit.

and was following him, when he was being led by the Jews to the house of Caiaphas, the chief of the synagogue. It is the same Peter to whom he said: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church.” Where Peter is, then, there is the church; where the church is, there is no death but eternal life. And therefore he added: “And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it, and I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven.” Blessed Peter, against whom the gate of hell did not prevail, against whom the gate of heaven did not close, but who on the contrary destroyed the entrances of hell and opened the heavenly places. So, placed on earth, he opened heaven and closed hell.

Explanation 40, chapter 31

40.31.1CSEL 64:250–251

Potest et illud conuenire huic loco, quod Samaritanus descendentem de Iericho hominem uulneratum illum a latronibus non praeteriuit, sed suscepit eum et uulnera eius curauit infundens oleum et uinum et imposuit supra iumentum suum et duxit ad stabulum. quid dubitas de equo bono, cum bonum et iumentum legeris, cum legeris in Hierusalem illam et equites multos et plurimos cum quadrigis et curribus introire?

That too can fit this place: that the Samaritan did not pass by that man who was going down from Jericho and had been wounded by robbers, but took him up and treated his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast and brought him to the inn. Why do you doubt about a good horse, when you read of a good beast too, when you read that into that Jerusalem many horsemen and very many enter with chariots and carriages?

40.31.2CSEL 64:251

nec te moueat, quod legisti: hi in curribus et hi in equis, nos autem in nomine domini dei nostri magnificabimur. ipsi obligati sunt et ceciderunt. sed Helias non cecidit, qui curru introiuit; ubi enim dei nomen est, ibi nullus obligatur, sed absoluuntur uniuersi. in nomine autem dei nostri et pauper est tutus et diues et nobilis et ignobilis et infirmus et potens. fidei non praeiudicant opes, si tamen uti opibus nouerimus.

And do not be troubled by what you have read: “Some in chariots and some in horses, but we will be magnified in the name of the Lord our God. They have been bound and have fallen.” But Elijah did not fall, who went in by chariot; for where the name of God is, there no one is bound, but all are set free. In the name of our God the poor man is safe, and the rich, the noble and the lowborn, the weak and the powerful. Riches do not prejudice faith, if only we know how to use riches.

Explanation 40, chapter 32

40.32.1CSEL 64:251

Et ideo nomen dei in se habens dicit: tu autem, domine nnine, miserere mei et resuscita me, et retribuam illis. quod utique non quasi de resurrectione dubitans dicit qui in potestate habebat dicere: soluite templum hoc, et triduo resuscitabo illud, sed formam dat homini, ut misericordiam a deo et resurrectionem de deo speret. deinde non resuscitari se petit, sed resuscitari sibi postulat Mathiam in locum Iudae, ut apostolicus numerus impleatur. etenim quia necesse habebat perire filius perditionis, ut scriptura impleretur, oportebat in locum ipsius subrogari filium salutis. tertium accipe.

And therefore, having the name of God in himself, he says: “But you, Lord, have mercy on me and raise me up, and I will repay them.” He surely does not say this as though doubting about the resurrection, he who had it in his power to say: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”; but he gives a pattern to man, that he may hope for mercy from God and resurrection from God. Next, he does not ask to be raised himself, but asks that Matthias be raised up for him in the place of Judas, so that the apostolic number might be filled. For since the son of perdition had to perish, that the Scripture might be fulfilled, it was fitting that a son of salvation be put in his place. Take a third meaning.

40.32.2CSEL 64:251–252

resuscitari se, hoc est corpus suum poscit, corpus autem Christi ecclesia est. et quia ludas figura erat infidelis populi Iudaeorum, qui pecunia uel emit uel uendidit Christum — quod faciunt qui pluris ducunt pecuniam quam religionem —, pro interitu plebis infidae significat ecclesiae sibi gratiam resurrecturam. unde et ipsa dicit in Canticis: si suscitaueritis et resuscitaueritis caritatem, cum quaereret de iuuenculis Christum, quia Christus caritas est.

He asks that he himself, that is, his body, be raised; and the body of Christ is the church. And since Judas was a figure of the unbelieving people of the Jews, who either bought or sold Christ for money — as those do who value money more than religion — he signifies that in place of the destruction of the unbelieving people the grace of the church will rise again for him. Hence the church herself says in the Song: “If you rouse and raise up love”, when she was seeking Christ from the young maidens, because Christ is love.

Explanation 40, chapter 33

40.33.1CSEL 64:252

Quod autem ait: retribuam eis, hoc intellegimus, quia florentis ecclesiae processibus cruciabuntur et tunc cognoscent, quae poena perfidiae sit, cum aduerterint, qui fidei sit splendor et gratiae. uel quia bonus dominus est, qui poterat dicere: retribuebant mihi mala pro bonis, et medium uerbum est retributionis uel in bono uel in malo, retributurum in bono esse se dicit, quia, etsi caecitas in Israel ex parte continget, tamen, cum plenitudo gentium intrauerit, tunc omnis Israel Christi miseratione saluabitur.

And what he says, “I will repay them”, we understand thus: that they will be tormented by the advances of the flourishing church, and then they will know what the punishment of faithlessness is, when they notice what the splendour of faith and grace is. Or, since the Lord is good, who could have said: “They repaid me evil for good”, and the word “repay” is neutral, whether for good or for evil, he says that he will repay for good; because, although blindness has befallen Israel in part, yet, when the fullness of the gentiles has come in, then all Israel will be saved by the mercy of Christ.

Explanation 40, chapter 34

40.34.1CSEL 64:252

Et subiecit: in hoc cognoui quoniam uoluisti me, quoniam non gaudebit inimicus meus super me. superius de passione sua locutus est quasi homo, hinc iam aperit maiestatem suam, quod solus sine peccato, solus cui peccator inequitare non potuit, solus quem pater ut unicum filium dilexerit. qua ratione ergo inimicus non est laetatus super eum? quia, etsi

And he added: “In this I have known that you have willed me, because my enemy will not rejoice over me.” Above he spoke of his passion as a man; from here he now discloses his majesty: that he alone is without sin, he alone on whom the sinner could not ride, he alone whom the Father loved as his only Son. For what reason, then, did the enemy not rejoice over him? Because, although

40.34.2CSEL 64:252

mortem suscepit pro nobis, resurrexit tamen et ipse insultauit inimico, cuius uictoriam destruxit et aculeum mortis infregit. et nos, licet in saeculo maesti simus atque in maerore nostro et contritione cordis animique nostri laetetur inimicus, tamen resurgentes eius gaudium destruimus. unde et Michaeas dixit: noli super me gaudere, inimica mea, quia cecidi, sed resurgam. resurrectio est ergo qua inimici omnia uincla soluuntur, triumphus omnis aboletur.

he took on death for us, yet he rose again and himself triumphed over the enemy, whose victory he destroyed and whose sting of death he broke. And we too, though we are sad in the world and the enemy rejoices in our grief and in the contrition of our heart and mind, yet by rising again we destroy his joy. Hence Micah too said: “Do not rejoice over me, my enemy, because I have fallen; but I will rise again.” The resurrection, then, is that by which all the enemy’s chains are loosed and all his triumph is abolished.

Explanation 40, chapter 35

40.35.1CSEL 64:252–253

Sequitur: propter innocentiam autem meam suscepisti me et confirmasti me in conspectu tuo in aeternum. benedictus dominus deus Israel in aeternum a saeculo et in saeculum; fiat, fiat. innocens nulli nocet, in neminem peccat. ideo sine peccato, sine dolo Christus scripturae diuinae auctoritate signatur; hoc igitur et hic declaratur, ubi dicit: propter innocentiam autem meam suscepisti me. quae autem susceptio significatur? nam et alibi legimus: suscepisti me ex utero matris meae.

There follows: “But because of my innocence you have upheld me and strengthened me in your sight for ever. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel for ever, from age to age; so be it, so be it.” The innocent man harms no one, sins against no one. Therefore Christ is marked by the authority of divine Scripture as without sin, without deceit; and so this is declared here too, where he says: “But because of my innocence you have upheld me.” And what upholding is signified? For elsewhere too we read: “You have upheld me from my mother’s womb.”

40.35.2CSEL 64:253

ergo quia ab omni concretione generationis humanae mundus est natus qui de spiritu est natus et uirgine, ideo eum pater suscepit, quia ortum eius nulla corporeae generationis concretio usitata fuscauit. suscepit eum resurgentem, quia nulla eum offensio prolapsionis aspersit. inmaculatus ad patrem rediit a quo inmaculatus exiuit, quando descendit in terras. unde dicit ei pater: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, hoc est: generationis meae in te priuilegium recognosco, quem nulla macula potuit inquinare peccati.

So, because he who was born of the Spirit and the Virgin was born pure from every admixture of human generation, therefore the Father upheld him, because no usual admixture of bodily generation darkened his birth. He upheld him as he rose, because no stain of falling had spattered him. Spotless he returned to the Father, from whom he had come out spotless when he came down to earth. Hence the Father says to him: “You are my Son; today I have begotten you”, that is: I recognize in you the privilege of my generation, you whom no stain of sin could defile.

40.35.3CSEL 64:253

inter peccatores uersatus es, peccata omnium suscepisti, peccatum pro omnibus factus es, maledictum pro omnibus factus es, sed nullus usus potuit ad te transire peccati. ita inter peccatores uersatus es, quasi inter angelos uersareris. fecisti terram esse quod caelum est, ut et ibi peccatum tolleres. hodie te genui in quo complacui. probasti te filium qui implesti patris in omnibus uoluntatem.

“You have lived among sinners, you have taken on the sins of all, you were made sin for all, you were made a curse for all; but no practice of sin could pass over to you. So you lived among sinners as though you were living among angels. You made earth to be what heaven is, so as to take away sin there too. Today I have begotten you, in whom I am well pleased. You have proved yourself the Son, you who have fulfilled the Father’s will in all things.

40.35.4CSEL 64:253

hodie te genui in quo lucem inmaculatae prolis agnosco. heri mihi et hodie ipse es et in saeculum. nox in te nulla est, quia totus es dies. bene confirmatus in conspectu patris dicitur in aeternum, quia apud patrem semper est et uere in conspectu eius, cuius splendor est gloriae et imago substantiae. sed quemadmodum complacet in filio pater, ita et filius benedicit patrem; pater enim honorificat filium et filius honorificat patrem.

Today I have begotten you, in whom I recognize the light of a spotless offspring. Yesterday and today you are the same, and for ever. There is no night in you, because you are wholly day.” Rightly he is said to be strengthened in the sight of the Father for ever, because he is always with the Father and truly in his sight, being the brightness of his glory and the image of his substance. But as the Father is well pleased in the Son, so also the Son blesses the Father; for the Father honours the Son and the Son honours the Father.

Explanation 40, chapter 36

40.36.1CSEL 64:253–254

Benedictus, inquit, dominus deus Israel, hoc est populi deum uidentis, qui et dominum suum et deum credit, a saeculo et in saeculum; fiat, fiat. in Hebraeo habet amen, amen, ut asseruerunt qui librum legerunt in Hebraicis litteris scriptum. Graecus hoc loco γένοιτο, γένοιτο dixit, quod est fiat, fiat. quod uerbum diuersas signi-

“Blessed,” he says, “be the Lord God of Israel”, that is, the God of the people that sees God, which believes him to be both its Lord and God, “from age to age; so be it, so be it.” The Hebrew has “amen, amen”, as those have asserted who have read the book written in Hebrew letters. The Greek in this place said genoito, genoito, which is “so be it, so be it”. This word has different

40.36.2CSEL 64:254

ficationes habet, ut sit interdum imperantis, interdum precantis, interdum confirmantis aliquid. imperantis est, cum superior inferiori statuit quid faciendum sit uel sequendum. precantis est sicut illud: fiat uoluntas tua; non enim deo quis imperat, sed precem fundit. confirmantis est, cum benedicit propheta uel sacerdos uel sanctus aliquis et populus respondet: fiat, fiat. hic ergo magis confirmatio mihi uidetur benedictionis quam oratio uel deprecatio, maxime quia repetitio ipsius facta sermonis est.

meanings: sometimes it is of one commanding, sometimes of one praying, sometimes of one confirming something. It is of one commanding when a superior lays down for an inferior what is to be done or followed. It is of one praying, as in that: “Your will be done”; for no one commands God, but pours out a prayer. It is of one confirming when a prophet or a priest or some holy man blesses and the people answers: “So be it, so be it.” Here, then, it seems to me rather a confirmation of the blessing than a prayer or entreaty, especially because the word itself is repeated.

40.36.3CSEL 64:254

I et uidetur Hebraeus quidem sermo mutatus, sed idem sensus expressus. sicut enim, cum sacerdos benedicit, populus respondet amen, confirmans benedictionem sibi quam plebi sacerdos a domino deprecatur, ita in psalmo responsum est fiat, fiat quasi amen, amen. amen autem confirmationis uerbum euidenter ostenditur in euangelio, ubi dominus confirmans sermonem suum dicit:

And it seems that the Hebrew word has indeed been changed, but the same sense expressed. For just as, when the priest blesses, the people answers “amen”, confirming for itself the blessing which the priest asks from the Lord for the people, so in the psalm the answer is “so be it, so be it”, as though “amen, amen”. And that amen is a word of confirmation is clearly shown in the gospel, where the Lord, confirming his word, says:

40.36.4CSEL 64:254

amen dico uobis. maior autem uis est, ubi repetitus est sermo, quod in libro euangelii secundum Iohannem frequentius inuenimus, quia ipse maxime de caelestibus et profundis mysteriis est locutus, sicut scriptum est: amen amen dico tibi, nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu sancto, non potest introire in regnum dei, et alibi: amen amen dico uobis, si quid petieritis a patre in nomine meo dabit uobis. abundant duo exempla; reliqua uero, si quis quaerit, inueniet.

“Amen I say to you.” But the force is greater where the word is repeated, as we find more often in the book of the gospel according to John, because he above all spoke of heavenly and deep mysteries, as it is written: “Amen, amen I say to you, unless one is reborn of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God”, and elsewhere: “Amen, amen I say to you, if you ask anything of the Father in my name, he will give it to you.” Two examples are enough; the rest anyone who seeks will find.

Explanation 40, chapter 37

40.37.1CSEL 64:254–255

Indicium quoque est libri finiti fiat, fiat. nam in quinque libros diuisum uidetur esse psalterium. primus liber hoc psalmo finitur, hoc est quadragesimo. et pulchre usque ad passionem saluatoris quadragesimus psalmus est comprehensus qui finem libro daret, quoniam passio domini finis est quadragesimae, ut secundus liber a mysteriis renouationis inciperet, qui liber, utpote quadragesimae, perfectiora sacramenta complectitur.

“So be it, so be it” is also the sign of a finished book. For the Psalter seems to be divided into five books. The first book ends with this psalm, that is, the fortieth. And beautifully the fortieth psalm, which takes in everything up to the passion of the Saviour, was to end the book, since the Lord’s passion is the end of Lent, so that the second book might begin from the mysteries of renewal; and this book, as following Lent, contains more perfect sacraments.

40.37.2CSEL 64:255

nam et baptismatis praenuntiat sacramenta, cum dicit: sicut ceruus desiderat ad fontes aquarum, et requiem sanctorum, qui ad tabernaculum caeleste peruenerint, et spiritus sancti descensionem, quando effusa est gratia spiritalis in quadam uoce caelestium cataractarum, quia uirtute magna spiritus ferebatur, ut legimus in Actibus apostolorum, et ingressum renouati hominis ad altare et saluatoris ascensum et sanctificationem propositi uirginalis.

For it foretells the sacraments of baptism, when it says: “As the hart longs for the springs of waters”; and the rest of the saints who reach the heavenly tabernacle; and the descent of the Holy Spirit, when the spiritual grace was poured out in a certain sound of heavenly cataracts, because the Spirit came with great power, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles; and the entry of the renewed man to the altar; and the Saviour’s ascension; and the sanctification of the virginal life.

40.37.3CSEL 64:255

qui liber finitur in psalmo septuagesimo primo, quo regnum Christi pacificum toto orbe diffusum prophetico sermone annuntiatur remissioque peccatorum; ubi, cum benedictionem domini praemisisset, subtexuit: et replebitur maiestate eius omnis terra. fiat, fiat. tertius quoque liber finitur octuagesimo octauo psalmo, et ibi habet: benedictus dominus in aeternum. fiat, fiat. quartus liber finitur centesimo quinto psalmo, et ibi habet: benedictus dominus deus Israel a saeculo et usque in saeculum; et dicet omnis populus: fiat, fiat. quintus liber usque ad finem est, ubi pro hoc uerbo propheta dicit: omnis spiritus laudet dominum.

This book ends in the seventy-first psalm, in which the peaceful kingdom of Christ spread through the whole world and the forgiveness of sins are announced in prophetic language; there, after giving the blessing of the Lord, it added: “And the whole earth will be filled with his majesty. So be it, so be it.” The third book also ends with the eighty-eighth psalm, and there it has: “Blessed be the Lord for ever. So be it, so be it.” The fourth book ends with the hundred and fifth psalm, and there it has: “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel from age to age; and all the people will say: So be it, so be it.” The fifth book runs to the end, where instead of this word the prophet says: “Let every spirit praise the Lord.”

Explanation 40, chapter 38

40.38.1CSEL 64:255–256

Sed iterum forsitan moueat, quomodo libros quinque adseram, cum unum psalterium sit. sed etiam euangelium unum est et quattuor libros esse negare non possumus. unum autem euangelium esse et alibi, ni fallor, intimauimus et, si iterum exigitur, facile possumus edocere, cum saluator dixerit: amen dico uobis, ubicumque praedicatum fuerit euangelium, et apostolus: miror quod sic tam cito transferimini in aliud euangelium quod non est aliud, nisi aliqui sunt qui uos peruertunt, et alibi: notum enim facio uobis, fratres, euangelium, nec usquam habes aliter de corpore isto quattuor librorum nisi euangelium significatum. denique quia unum corpus est etiam psalmorum, scriptura dixit: in decachordo psalterio cum cantico in cithara. sed iterum quia quinque libri sunt, dixit alibi: in uasis psalmorum.

But perhaps it may trouble someone again how I can assert five books when there is one Psalter. But the gospel too is one, and we cannot deny that there are four books. That the gospel is one we have shown elsewhere, if I am not mistaken, and if it is asked again, we can easily show it, since the Saviour said: “Amen I say to you, wherever the gospel is preached”, and the apostle: “I wonder that you are so soon being moved to another gospel, which is not another, except that there are some who pervert you”, and elsewhere: “For I make known to you, brothers, the gospel”; nor do you ever find this body of four books signified otherwise than as “the gospel”. Finally, because the psalms too are one body, Scripture said: “On the ten-stringed psaltery with a song on the harp.” But again, because there are five books, it said elsewhere: “On the vessels of psalms.”

Explanation 40, chapter 39

40.39.1CSEL 64:256

Pulchre autem quinque libri et unum psalterium, quoniam quinque sensibus homo exterior uiuificatur et rursus quinque spiritalibus sensibus ille absconditus cordis homo noster consummatur interior, qui solus ante deum locuples Petri apostoli testimonio repperitur. qui habet, inquit, aures audiendi audiat. habes unum sensum.

Beautifully, then, there are five books and one Psalter, since the outer man is given life by five senses, and again our inner man, that hidden man of the heart, is perfected by five spiritual senses, which alone is found rich before God, by the testimony of the apostle Peter. “He who has ears to hear,” he says, “let him hear.” You have one sense.

40.39.2CSEL 64:256

et sicut sunt qui oculos habent et non uident, ita sunt qui oculis non uidentibus plus uidere creduntur. unde et prophetae dicebantur uidentes, etiam qui oculis non uiderent. bonus etiam ille odor de quo apostolus dixit: bonus odor Christi sumus deo, unde et Iob dixit: et spiritus diuinus qui est in naribus meis. idem ergo odor Christi et spiritus sancti est deo, quia unus odor est trinitatis. est et interior cibus, de quo dixit dominus: meus cibus est ut

And just as there are those who have eyes and do not see, so there are those who, with eyes that do not see, are believed to see more. Hence the prophets were called seers, even those who did not see with their eyes. Good too is that fragrance of which the apostle said: “We are the good fragrance of Christ to God”; hence Job too said: “And the divine Spirit which is in my nostrils.” The same, then, is the fragrance of Christ and of the Holy Spirit to God, because there is one fragrance of the Trinity. There is also an inner food, of which the Lord said: “My food is to

40.39.3CSEL 64:256–257

faciam uoluntatem patris mei qui in caelo est. est et interior tactus, quo Christum tetigit illa in euangelio, quae per duodecim annos sanguinem profluebat nec a medicis acceperat sanitatem, sed accepit a Christo. fidei tactus est quo tangitur Christus. denique eum homines non uidebant, sed uidebat Iesus et se uidisse testatus est dicens: tetigit me aliquis; nam et ego cognoui uirtutem de me exisse. cognitio Christi conlatio sanitatis est. ergo quoniam decem sensus homini inesse manifestum est, ideo Dauid, qui et foris et intus canebat, foris corpore, intus corde, dicit in psalmo: in decachordo psalterio psallam tibi.

do the will of my Father who is in heaven.” There is also an inner touch, by which in the gospel she touched Christ who had suffered from a flow of blood for twelve years and had not received health from physicians, but received it from Christ. It is the touch of faith by which Christ is touched. Finally, men did not see her, but Jesus saw, and testified that he had seen, saying: “Someone touched me; for I perceived that power had gone out from me.” To be known by Christ is the gift of health. So, since it is clear that there are ten senses in man, David, who sang both outwardly and inwardly, outwardly with the body, inwardly with the heart, says in the psalm: “On the ten-stringed psaltery I will sing psalms to you.”

Explanation 40, chapter 40

40.40.1CSEL 64:257

Psalterium ergo est homo consummatus in Christo, in quo, sicut arte concinentium fila chordarum, ita conuenientium resonant opera canora uirtutum, ut possit dicere: psallam tibi, deus, in cithara, sanctus Israel. gaudebunt labia mea cum cantauero tibi, et anima mea quam redemisti. Paulus ait de se: foris pugnae, intus timores.

The psaltery, then, is the man perfected in Christ, in whom, as the strings sound together by the art of the players, so the melodious works of harmonious virtues resound, so that he can say: “I will sing psalms to you, God, on the harp, Holy One of Israel. My lips will rejoice when I sing to you, and my soul, which you have redeemed.” Paul says of himself: “Fightings without, fears within.”

40.40.2CSEL 64:257

hic et intus et foris gaudet, sed ille adhuc in certamine, iste in remissione, quia redemptionem animae suae se meruisse cognouerat. qui psallit, in laetitia est, qui luctatur, in sollicitudine. uerum et Paulus sciebat psallere, sed adhuc se processibus reseruabat, cum foret plenius comprobatus, ut psalleret. et ideo dixit: orabo spiritu, orabo et mente; psallam spiritu, psallam et mente.

This man rejoices both within and without, but that one was still in the contest, this one in release, because he knew that he had obtained the redemption of his soul. He who sings psalms is in gladness; he who wrestles is in anxiety. Yet Paul too knew how to sing psalms, but he was still keeping himself for further advances, until, more fully proved, he might sing psalms. And therefore he said: “I will pray with the spirit, I will pray with the mind also; I will sing psalms with the spirit, I will sing psalms with the mind also.”

Explanation 40, chapter 41

40.41.1CSEL 64:257

Et quia geminum psallendi officium demonstrauit, geminam quoque uocem esse scriptura edocuit propheta dicente: uoce mea ad dominum clamaui et uox mea ad deum, et intendit mihi. quid est mea? potuit enim dicere: clamaui ad dominum. sed quae nostra est uox nisi ista quae melior est, quae nescit errare? nam ex multiloquio peccatum incurrimus et uitare non possumus.

And since he showed a twofold duty of singing psalms, Scripture taught that there is also a twofold voice, the prophet saying: “With my voice I cried to the Lord, and my voice to God, and he gave heed to me.” What is “my”? For he could have said: “I cried to the Lord.” But what is our voice but that which is better, which does not know how to err? For from much speaking we incur sin and cannot avoid it.

40.41.2CSEL 64:257–258

illa uox prophetae est quae ad deum peruenit, quae tacente Moyse clamauit ad dominum, qua etiam in orationibus suis Anna clamabat, cum oris sui labia non moueret, et impetrauit filium quem ante diu non impetrauerat, cum corporis uoce clamasset. de hac uoce dixit dominus: tu autem cum oras, intra in cubiculum tuum et clauso ostio ora patrem tuum qui est in abscondito; et pater tuus qui uidet in abscondito reddet tibi. quid est reddet? hoc est quod deprecatus es, quod orasti.

That is the voice of the prophet which reaches God, which cried to the Lord while Moses was silent, with which Hannah too cried out in her prayers when she did not move the lips of her mouth, and obtained the son whom she had long not obtained when she had cried out with the voice of the body. Of this voice the Lord said: “But you, when you pray, go into your room and, shutting the door, pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will repay you.” What is “will repay”? That is, what you have entreated, what you have prayed for.

40.41.3CSEL 64:258

sicut enim peccatores de manu domini recipiunt peccata sua duplicia, ita e contrario iusti recipiunt cum effectu propria postulata. audi quomodo recipiant. ascendit oratio tua ad deum et descendit ad. unde et in psalmo legimus: et oratio mea in sinum meum conuertetur, ut fructum scilicet referat postulanti. benedictus dominus deus Israel, qui tanta nobis aperuit mysteria, a saeculo et in saeculum, id est ex infinito in infinitum. fiat, fiat.

For just as sinners receive their sins double from the hand of the Lord, so on the contrary the righteous receive their own requests with effect. Hear how they receive them. Your prayer goes up to God and comes down to [you]. Hence in the psalm too we read: “And my prayer will return into my bosom”, that is, so as to bring back fruit to the one who asks. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, who has opened such great mysteries to us, from age to age, that is, from the infinite into the infinite. So be it, so be it.

Explanation 43, chapter 1

43.1.1CSEL 64:258–259

Psalmi titulus est: in finem; filiis Core intellectus. ubi passionis dominicae et baptismatis et ingressionis ad altare sacrosanctum decursa mysteria sunt, docet sanctus propheta Dauid, quemadmodum athletam suum, cuius nomen teneatur in agone sanctorum, Christus exerceat. sicut enim sine labore nostro non ex operibus, sed ex fide per gratiam suam nobis peccata donauit et ad coronae petitionem indulgentissimus nos et benignus admisit nec superiora nobis fecit obesse flagitia, quibus tanto certamine iudicaremur indigni — quaeritur enim etiam in his, qui lustrale certamen hoc subeunt, etiam disciplina uiuendi —, ita rursus, ne tanta peccatorum donatione resoluti in superiora flagitia uel desidiam reuertamur, psalmus iste nos ammonet multa nobis et grauia certamina esse proposita, ut nemo nisi qui legitime certauerit coronetur.

The title of the psalm is: “To the end; for the sons of Korah, for understanding.” After the mysteries of the Lord’s passion and of baptism and of the entry to the most holy altar have been gone through, the holy prophet David teaches how Christ trains his athlete, whose name is to be held in the contest of the saints. For just as, without labour of ours, not from works but from faith, he forgave us our sins by his grace, and most indulgently and kindly admitted us to seek the crown, and did not let our former crimes stand against us, by which we would be judged unworthy of so great a contest — for even in those who undergo this contest of purification a discipline of living is also required —, so again, lest, relaxed by so great a forgiveness of sins, we return to our former crimes or to sloth, this psalm warns us that many and grave contests are set before us, so that no one is crowned unless he has competed lawfully.

43.1.2CSEL 64:259

luctandum est igitur aduersus carnis huius inlecebras et feruorem sanguinis, luctandum est aduersus nequitias spiritales. nemo grauior domestico aduersario, nemo nocentior eo hoste cui caelestis substantiae potentia suffragatur. cum dico nemo, diuini memento sermonis, quo dixit dominus, quia maior ex natis mulieris Iohanne Baptista nemo; nam qui natus est ex uirgine, ipse super omnes est. et ideo neminem uereamur qui Christum habemus, quoniam, si Christus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

We must wrestle, then, against the enticements of this flesh and the heat of the blood; we must wrestle against spiritual wickedness. No adversary is more grievous than the one at home, no enemy more harmful than the one supported by the power of a heavenly substance. When I say “no one”, remember the divine saying in which the Lord said that among those born of woman none is greater than John the Baptist; for he who was born of the Virgin is himself above all. And therefore let us fear no one, we who have Christ; since, if Christ is for us, who is against us?

43.1.3CSEL 64:259

certemus ergo usque ad finem, ut euacuatis omnibus, quae aduersum Iesum et domini uoluntatem in nostro ante corpore militabant, uerae exercitiis uirtutis intenti soli deo nostro et domino seruiamus. hic enim finis, ut scriptum est: primitiae Christus, deinde finis, cum tradiderit regnum deo et patri, cum euacuauerit omnem principatum et potestatem et uirtutem, ut mors nouissima destruatur et incipiamus deo esse subiecti regnum in nobis caeleste seruantes, ubi erat ante conluuio peccatorum.

Let us contend, then, to the end, so that, when everything has been made void which formerly fought in our body against Jesus and the will of the Lord, we may be intent on the exercises of true virtue and serve our God and Lord alone. For this is the end, as it is written: “Christ the firstfruits, then the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has made void every principality and authority and power”, so that death may be destroyed last, and we may begin to be subject to God, keeping the heavenly kingdom in us where formerly there was the filth of sins.

Explanation 43, chapter 2

43.2.1CSEL 64:259–260

Merito ergo in finem; filiis Core intellectus inscribitur, ut in eo cognoscendo non uulgaris auditus, sed intellectus spiritalis operetur. denique Aquilas psalmum disciplinae posuit. et ideo tibi dicit scriptura: da in disciplinam cor tuum, aures autem tuas praepara sermonibus intellectus, et alibi dilige sapientiam et disciplinam.

Rightly, then, it is entitled “To the end; for the sons of Korah, for understanding”, so that in knowing it not common hearing but spiritual understanding may be at work. Indeed Aquila put “a psalm of discipline”. And therefore Scripture says to you: “Give your heart to discipline, and prepare your ears for words of understanding”, and elsewhere: “Love wisdom and discipline.”

43.2.2CSEL 64:260

sapientia est quae sensu scaturit, disciplina in habitudinem quandam naturae coalita forma uirtutum et mentis confirmata sententia scientiae disciplinis. intellegere quoque obscurum sermonem atque dictionum prudentiam et aenigmata Prouerbiorum scriptura nos docuit, cuius auctoritate colligimus has prudentiae principales esse uirtutes, eo quod sapientia semper quasi mater fecunda parturiat, disciplina quasi seuerior magistra distringat, intellectus quasi diligens quaesitor inueniat et ueram iustitiam iudiciumque rimetur.

Wisdom is what springs from the mind; discipline is the form of the virtues grown together into a kind of natural habit and the judgment of the mind made firm by the disciplines of knowledge. Scripture has also taught us to understand dark sayings and the prudence of words and the riddles of Proverbs; by its authority we gather that these are the principal virtues of prudence, because wisdom always gives birth like a fruitful mother, discipline restrains like a sterner teacher, understanding finds like a diligent searcher and investigates true justice and judgment.

Explanation 43, chapter 3

43.3.1CSEL 64:260

Doceamus haec sacrae testimoniis lectionis. Sapientia dicit: ego quasi fons a paradiso dixi: rigabo meum hortum et adhuc doctrinam quasi prophetiam effundam; nam generationes suas menti hominis et bonos sensus quasi pia mater infundit. accipe etiam testimonia disciplinae: fili, ne neglexeris disciplinam dei nec defeceris ab eo correptus;

Let us teach these things by the testimonies of the sacred reading. Wisdom says: “I said, like a fountain from paradise: I will water my garden; and further I will pour out teaching like prophecy”; for like a loving mother she pours her offspring and good thoughts into the mind of man. Take also the testimonies of discipline: “My son, do not neglect the discipline of God, nor faint when you are rebuked by him;

43.3.2CSEL 64:260

quem enim diligit deus corripit. seuera quidem in corripiendo, sed dulcis in corrigendo est disciplina, ne fluitemus et uagemur errantes, sed recipiamur a Christo; disciplina enim non examinata uagatur, ut scriptum est. sed pro conuersatione hic posuit disciplinam. tamen sicut sapientia, ita et disciplina: et perfecta et inperfecta eodem nomine nuncupatur;

for whom God loves he rebukes.” Discipline is severe indeed in rebuking, but sweet in correcting, so that we may not drift and wander in error, but be received by Christ; for undisciplined discipline wanders, as it is written. But here he has put “discipline” for “way of life”. Yet, like wisdom, discipline too, both perfect and imperfect, is called by the same name;

43.3.3CSEL 64:260–261

sed ubi sine adiectione uel disciplina uel sapientia nuncupantur, definitionem perfectionis accipiunt. inexaminata ergo fluitat disciplina, sed examinata non fluitat. de intellectu quoque eadem scriptura definit, quia intellectus bonus est omnibus qui eum faciunt. intellectus autem cum in se et sapientiae gratiam habeat et ordinem disciplinae, utique docemur quod et sapientia et disciplina bonae sint eis, qui earum instituta suis ministeriis execuntur. diximus de titulo, psalmum adoriamur.

but where discipline or wisdom are named without qualification, they take the definition of perfection. Undisciplined discipline, then, drifts; but disciplined discipline does not drift. Of understanding too the same Scripture defines that “understanding is good to all who do it”. And since understanding has in itself both the grace of wisdom and the order of discipline, we are surely taught that both wisdom and discipline are good to those who carry out their precepts in their services. We have spoken of the title; let us approach the psalm.

Explanation 43, chapter 4

43.4.1CSEL 64:261

Deus, auribus nostris audiuimus. sic Symmachus. Theodotion in auribus nostris dixit, sicut et Septuaginta uiri. quid est quod ait nostris auribus? quodsi non satis esset audiuimus, certe, si hoc placuerat, auribus audiuimus plenum erat. cum ergo additum est nostris, quid sibi hoc uult, nisi ut intellegas illa esse nostra quae mentis sunt et ea esse meliora quam quae istius corporis?

“O God, with our ears we have heard.” So Symmachus. Theodotion said “in our ears”, as did the Seventy. What does he mean by “our ears”? If “we have heard” was not enough, surely, if that was what he wanted, “with ears we have heard” was complete. Since, then, “our” has been added, what does it mean, unless that you should understand that the things of the mind are ours, and that they are better than those of this body?

43.4.2CSEL 64:261

et ideo quasi de alio dicit hic ipse propheta: non timebo quid faciat mihi caro, et alibi uoce mea ad dominum clamaui, et uox mea ad deum, et respexit me. illa uox mea, quae auditur a Christo, non quae resultat in publico. non uult igitur suum esse quod corruptibile atque terrenum est, qui ad imaginem dei et similitudinem meminit se creatum. denique scriptura nos edocet prius hominem ad imaginem dei esse formatum, postea de luto factum. quasi?

And therefore this same prophet says, as though of another: “I will not fear what flesh may do to me”, and elsewhere: “With my voice I cried to the Lord, and my voice to God, and he looked on me.” That is my voice which is heard by Christ, not that which resounds in public. He who remembers that he was created to the image and likeness of God does not wish what is corruptible and earthly to be his own. Indeed, Scripture teaches us that man was first formed to the image of God, afterwards made from clay.

43.4.3CSEL 64:261–262

i superior ergo — superior enim qui antiquior — et gubernator et rector huius corporis animae uigor dicit: auribus nostris audiuimus. quis iste est nisi cui dicitur: qui habet aures audiendi audiat? sunt enim qui aures habent et mysteria audire non possunt, de quibus dicit Iesus in Reuelatione Iohannis: foras canes et ueneficos et inpudicos, quibus flagitiorum cupiditas et aerugo pecuniae aurem obstruit audiendi. consideremus igitur, quae audisse se dicant uel a quibus audisse commemorent.

So as the superior — for the superior is the older — the vigour of the soul, the governor and ruler of this body, says: “With our ears we have heard.” Who is this but the one to whom it is said: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear”? For there are those who have ears and cannot hear the mysteries, of whom Jesus says in the Revelation of John: “Outside are the dogs and the sorcerers and the unchaste”, whose ear for hearing is stopped by the lust of crimes and the rust of money. Let us consider, then, what they say they have heard, or from whom they recall that they heard it.

Explanation 43, chapter 5

43.5.1CSEL 64:262

Patres, inquit, nostri annuntiauerunt nobis. qui isti sunt patres? titulus habet, quia psalmus filiis Core scriptus sit, ut ab ipsis canatur, qui psallendi munus receperunt et in huiusmodi officium fuerant deputati. Core autem et Dathan et Abiron cum aliis, qui aduersum Moysen et Aaron insurrexerant studio contumaci, terrae hiatu in deserto uorati sunt et necati. quibus mortuis qui alii patres eorum filiis mirabilia opera domini annuntiare potuerunt?

“Our fathers,” he says, “have told us.” Who are these fathers? The title has it that the psalm was written for the sons of Korah, to be sung by them, who had received the office of singing psalms and had been appointed to that kind of duty. But Korah and Dathan and Abiram, with others who had risen against Moses and Aaron with stubborn zeal, were swallowed up in the desert by the opening of the earth and killed. When they were dead, what other fathers could have told their sons the wonderful works of the Lord?

43.5.2CSEL 64:262

in maliuolam enim animam non ingreditur sapientia. si suis ergo non annuntiarunt filiis, alienis multo minus, qui declinarent subolem perfidorum. qui sunt itaque isti patres? uide ne illi, de quibus dictum est: interroga patrem tuum, ipse tibi dicet. interrogas quando legis Paulum; uel si non legis et mouet te aliquid, in ipso require. ipse est enim bonus pater, qui potest docere et formare in nobis dominum Iesum. sicut ipse testatus est dicens: filioli mei, quos ego parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis.

For wisdom does not enter a malicious soul. If, then, they did not tell their own sons, much less others’, who would avoid the offspring of the faithless. Who, then, are these fathers? See whether they are not those of whom it was said: “Ask your father, and he will tell you.” You ask when you read Paul; or if you do not read him and something troubles you, seek it in him. For he is the good father, who can teach and form the Lord Jesus in us, as he himself testified, saying: “My little children, with whom I am in labour until Christ is formed in you.”

43.5.3CSEL 64:262

ostendit tibi hos patres euangelista Iohannes, qui ait: dico uobis patres, qui cognouistis quod ab initio est. isti sunt patres, quorum senectus uita inmaculata est. ideo in conuentu seniorum appone digitum ori tuo, ut audias quod tibi prosit et uitae aeternae sacramenta cognoscas, ne interstrepas insolens tiro doctoribus et qui adhuc discere debeas dicere praesumas. quid igitur isti patres annuntiauerint Core filiis, audiamus.

John the evangelist shows you these fathers, who says: “I say to you, fathers, who have known what is from the beginning.” These are the fathers whose old age is a spotless life. Therefore in the assembly of the elders put your finger to your lips, so that you may hear what is profitable to you and come to know the mysteries of eternal life, so that you do not, as an insolent recruit, make a noise against the teachers and presume to speak when you still ought to learn. Let us hear, then, what these fathers told the sons of Korah.

Explanation 43, chapter 6

43.6.1CSEL 64:262–263

Opus, inquit, quod operatus es in diebus antiquis. qui sunt isti dies, in quibus deus magna et mirabilia operatus sit, requiramus. edocet nos scriptura esse aliquos praeclaros dies, in quibus refulserint facta diuina, cum lectum sit, quia sol in tenebras conuertetur et luna in sanguinem, priusquam ueniat dies domini magnus et inlustris; et erit quicumque inuocauerit nomen domini saluus erit.

“The work,” he says, “which you worked in the days of old.” Let us inquire which are these days in which God worked great and wonderful things. Scripture teaches us that there are certain glorious days in which divine deeds have shone, since we have read that the sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood, before the great and glorious day of the Lord comes; and whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.

43.6.2CSEL 64:263

in ipso enim die Christus hominibus resurrexit et ideo specialiter de ipso dictum est: hic est dies quem fecit dominus; exultemus et laetemur in eo. cum igitur omnes dies deus fecerit, huic tamen diei prae ceteris diuini operis praerogatiua delata est, quo peccatum omne sublatum est; dies autem alii peccatorum sunt. hic ergo est dies quem inluminauit sol ille iustitiae; nam et ipsa ortus suos et occasus habere consueuit, unde et scriptum est: orietur in diebus eius iustitia. sunt ergo dies Christi quibus.

For on that day Christ rose again for men, and therefore it was said specially of it: “This is the day which the Lord has made; let us exult and rejoice in it.” Although God made all days, yet to this day above the rest the privilege of divine work has been given, on which all sin was taken away; but other days belong to sins. This, then, is the day which that sun of righteousness has lit; for righteousness too is accustomed to have its risings and settings, and so it is written: “In his days righteousness will rise.” There are, then, days of Christ in which

43.6.3CSEL 64:263

orta iustitia est, sunt dies Christi quibus orta est pacis abundantia, sunt dies Christi quibus orta sapientia est. audi quomodo exoriatur sapientia: si quis uidetur sapiens esse inter uos in hoc saeculo, stultus fiat, ut sit sapiens. et ideo dicit Sapientia, quae stulta istius mundi elegit: dominus creauit me principium uiarum suarum in opera sua. sicut enim in diebus Oziae regis, in diebus Nabuchodonosor exorta perfidia est, dominata captiuitas, sic in diebus domini Iesu exorta est fides, quae splendorem suae claritatis et luminis toto orbe diffudit.

righteousness has risen; there are days of Christ in which abundance of peace has risen; there are days of Christ in which wisdom has risen. Hear how wisdom rises: “If anyone among you seems to be wise in this age, let him become foolish, that he may be wise.” And therefore Wisdom, which chose the foolish things of this world, says: “The Lord created me the beginning of his ways for his works.” For just as in the days of King Uzziah, in the days of Nebuchadnezzar, faithlessness arose and captivity held sway, so in the days of the Lord Jesus faith arose, which has spread the splendour of its brightness and light over the whole world.

43.6.4CSEL 64:263–264

qui enim meliores dies quam quibus refulsit nobis uisio dei, sicut dixit Iacob? sic enim scriptum est: uidi deum facie ad faciem et saluata est anima mea. et continuo exortus est ei sol. quis iste sol nisi qui dies fecit fulgere iustitiae, quibus in terra natus est Christus ex uirgine? in specie uidit Iacob et deum uidisse se dixit; in ueritate uiderunt Iudaei et non crediderunt.

For what better days than those in which the vision of God shone upon us, as Jacob said? For so it is written: “I have seen God face to face, and my soul has been saved.” And at once the sun rose upon him. Who is this sun but the one who made the days of righteousness shine, in which Christ was born on earth of the Virgin? Jacob saw in a figure, and said that he had seen God; the Jews saw in truth and did not believe.

43.6.5CSEL 64:264

ideo illis breuiati sunt dies, nobis inluminati, quoniam illis deficiebat dies, nobis appropinquabat. unde Iudaicam sanctus Dauid refugiens caecitatem ait: ne deducas in dimidium dierum meorum. sic enim dies domini magnus et inlustris est utique non prolixitate temporis, sed iustitiae uel gratiae claritate. ergo sunt dimidii dies quibus breuiantur impietatis caligine et squalore perfidiae, quibus occidit sol super prophetas, sicut scriptum est. namque ut iustis oritur sol iustitiae, sic occidit infidelibus.

Therefore for them the days were shortened, for us lit up, since for them the day was failing, for us it was drawing near. Hence holy David, shunning the blindness of the Jews, says: “Do not take me away in the half of my days.” For so the great and glorious day of the Lord is so certainly not by length of time, but by the brightness of righteousness or grace. So there are half-days, which are shortened by the darkness of impiety and the squalor of faithlessness, in which the sun sets upon the prophets, as it is written. For as the sun of righteousness rises for the righteous, so it sets for the unbelieving.

Explanation 43, chapter 7

43.7.1CSEL 64:264

Sed occurrit illud, quia dicit dominus: propter electos breuiabuntur dies et uidetur contrarium, nisi diligenter aduertas et superiora repetas. dicit enim dominus: tunc si quis uobis dixerit: ecce hic Christus, aut: ecce illic, nolite credere; surgent enim pseudochristi et pseudoprophetae et dabunt signa

But this occurs to us, that the Lord says: “For the sake of the elect the days will be shortened”, and it seems contrary, unless you pay close attention and go back over what precedes. For the Lord says: “Then if anyone says to you, See, here is the Christ, or, See, there, do not believe; for false christs and false prophets will arise and will give great signs

43.7.2CSEL 64:264

magna et prodigia, ita ut in errorem inducantur, si fieri potest, etiam electi. et ideo, ne decipiantur electi, ammonet dominus quid sequendum sit, ut non falsorum prophetarum sermone capiamur neque nos eorum aliqua prodigiosa facta decipiant, sed tunc credamus Christum esse uenturum, cum dies pleni iustitiae coeperint refulgere. Christus enim pleno maiestatis suae lumine reuelabitur et, sicut fulgur exit ab oriente et toto lumen suum usque in occidentem orbe diffundit, sic

and wonders, so as to lead into error, if possible, even the elect.” And therefore, so that the elect may not be deceived, the Lord warns what is to be followed: that we should not be caught by the talk of false prophets nor be deceived by any of their prodigious deeds, but believe that Christ is coming when days full of righteousness begin to shine. For Christ will be revealed in the full light of his majesty, and, as lightning goes out from the east and spreads its light over the whole world to the west, so

43.7.8CSEL 64:264–265

et filius hominis cum suis angelis ueniens inluminabit hunc mundum, ut credat omnis homo et salua fiat omnis caro. non ergo credamus antichristo, de quo dicent falsi prophetae: hic est Christus; dies enim perfidiae erunt antichristi dies. non credamus his qui dicent: Christus in deserto, Christus in penetralibus; iam enim omnia plena sunt Christi, ubi appropinquare coeperit Christus. sed cum uiderimus facta quae Christus in euangelio suo ante praedixit, tunc credamus eius aduentum, ne, dum uerum quaerimus lumen, infidelitatis tenebras incidamus.

the Son of Man too, coming with his angels, will light up this world, so that every man may believe and all flesh be saved. So let us not believe the Antichrist, of whom false prophets will say: “This is the Christ”; for the days of faithlessness will be the days of the Antichrist. Let us not believe those who will say: “Christ in the desert, Christ in the inner rooms”; for by then all things are full of Christ, when Christ begins to draw near. But when we see the things that Christ foretold in his gospel, then let us believe his coming, lest, while we seek the true light, we fall into the darkness of unbelief.

Explanation 43, chapter 8

43.8.1CSEL 64:265

Cauenda ergo signa perfidiae, quibus breuiantur dies atque minuuntur. sol enim obscurabitur, stellae cadent, hoc est iusti dei; sunt enim qui fulgeant sicut stellae in caelo. cum haec uidens, crede adhuc tardare Christum; ubi enim Christus, ibi fides clarior, ubi antichristus, ibi dies dimidii. de quibus utique non quereretur Dauid propheta, si ad temporis breuitatem uideretur esse referendum, cum ipse alibi dixerit: heu me quod incolatus meus prolongatus est!

We must beware, then, of the signs of faithlessness by which the days are shortened and diminished. For the sun will be darkened, the stars will fall, that is, the righteous of God; for there are those who shine like stars in heaven. When you see these things, believe that Christ is still delaying; for where Christ is, there faith is brighter; where the Antichrist is, there are the half-days. Of these the prophet David would surely not complain, if they were to be referred to shortness of time, since he himself says elsewhere: “Woe is me, that my sojourning is prolonged!”

43.8.2CSEL 64:265

quomodo aut illum dilatum incolatum caelestem aut hunc terrenum comperendinatum doleret, qui ante poposcerat, ne in dimidium dierum suorum deduceretur, cum dierum breuitas celerandi cursus istius compendium uideretur afferre? unde colligitur et illud, quod ait: honora patrem et matrem, ut longaeuus sis super terram, quomodo intellegere debeamus. multi enim, qui honorant, cito saepe rapiuntur, ut inmatura aetate moriantur, multi etiam, qui minus deferunt parentibus suis, longaeuae fruuntur stipendiis senectutis, et nisi longaeuitatem illam uitae accipiamus aeternae, inuenitur scriptura destitui subsidio ueritatis.

How could he grieve either that the heavenly sojourning was delayed or that this earthly one was prolonged, he who had earlier asked not to be taken away in the half of his days, when shortness of days would seem to bring a shortcut to hasten this course? From this we also gather how we ought to understand that saying: “Honour your father and mother, that you may be long-lived upon the earth.” For many who honour them are often snatched away quickly, so as to die at an untimely age, and many who show less respect to their parents enjoy the long wages of old age; and unless we take that long life as eternal life, Scripture is found to be without the support of truth.

43.8.3CSEL 64:265–266

unde Graecus expressius dixit: ut sis multorum dierum, hoc est πολυήμερος; quicumque enim cultus pios sedulo seruat officio, a tenebris noctis alienus in dierum luce uersatur. et ideo, qui legit Deuteronomium, leget, inquit, illud omnibus diebus uitae tuae, non utique noctibus, sed diebus, quia dies fulget legenti mysteria ueritatis et diuinae pietatis oracula. consideremus sequentia.

Hence the Greek said more expressly: “that you may be of many days”, that is, polyēmeros; for whoever diligently keeps the duties of piety lives in the light of days, a stranger to the darkness of night. And therefore he says of the one who reads Deuteronomy: “He shall read it all the days of his life”; certainly not by nights, but by days, because day shines on the one who reads the mysteries of truth and the oracles of divine piety. Let us consider what follows.

Explanation 43, chapter 9

43.9.1CSEL 64:266

Manus tua gentes disperdidit, et plantasti eos, afflixisti populos et expulisti eos. scimus quidem quod multas gentes eradicauerit dominus et euerterit, ut possessionem sibi Iudaeorum populus inueniret, quarum gentium terras Abrahae semini daturum se dominus declarauit. sed cum psalmus iste euangelium domini et tempora aduentus eius annuntiet, non mihi uidetur quae superius a Iudaeis gesta sunt

“Your hand destroyed the nations, and you planted them; you afflicted peoples and drove them out.” We know indeed that the Lord uprooted and overthrew many nations, so that the people of the Jews might find a possession for themselves, nations whose lands the Lord declared he would give to the seed of Abraham. But since this psalm announces the gospel of the Lord and the times of his coming, it does not seem to me to

43.9.2CSEL 64:266

recensere, sed quae futura signare, quemadmodum crediturus esset populus nationum. confirmat igitur fidem ecclesiae, antequam nuntiet, et uictorias pietatis eius enumerat, quae non in brachio neque in gladio suo feras expulit gentes et non certamine bellico turmas fugauit hostiles, sed mansuetudine ac fide terras inimicorum sine ullo cruore possedit; fides enim sola pugnauit. et ideo triumphos

review what was done before by the Jews, but to signify what was to come: how the people of the nations would believe. So it confirms the faith of the church before announcing it, and lists the victories of its piety, which drove out fierce nations not by its arm or its sword, and put enemy troops to flight not by warlike combat, but possessed the lands of enemies without any bloodshed, by gentleness and faith; for faith alone fought. And therefore it won triumphs

43.9.3CSEL 64:266

meruit quos non reuocaret perfidia, sed augeret, quia persecutionibus suis non uincitur ecclesia domini, sed probatur. quae sunt igitur istae gentes, quas uicerit ecclesia, cognoscamus. uetera dico uocabula, sed mysteria noua: Chananaei sunt, Chettaei et Amorraei, Pherezaei uel ceteri quorum infra uocabula digeremus. haec autem

which faithlessness did not undo but increased, because the Lord’s church is not conquered by its persecutions but proved. Let us learn, then, which are these nations that the church has conquered. I speak old names, but new mysteries: they are the Canaanites, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Perizzites and the others whose names we shall set out below. These

43.9.4CSEL 64:266

populorum sunt nomina, sed passionum infirmitates et humanorum incentiua et obprobria peccatorum. quod primum est igitur, homo in Christo ipse se domuit et ipse se uicit, ut sibi uiueret; sibi enim uiuit qui deo uiuit, ut uitam Christi uiuat aeternam. non ergo pugnauit militaribus armis et ferreis telis populus ecclesiae, sicut pugnauit populus Iudaeorum. ille in figura pugnauit, nos pugnamus in spiritu; ille aduersum alienigenas pugnauit, nos ipsi bellum habemus in nobis et ideo prius nobis uincendae sunt proprii corporis passiones.

are names of peoples, but they are the weaknesses of the passions and the incitements and reproaches of human sins. What comes first, then, is that man in Christ has tamed himself and conquered himself, so as to live for himself; for he lives for himself who lives for God, so as to live the eternal life of Christ. So the people of the church did not fight with military weapons and iron darts, as the people of the Jews fought. They fought in a figure, we fight in the spirit; they fought against foreigners, we have the war within ourselves, and therefore the passions of our own body must first be conquered.

Explanation 43, chapter 10

43.10.1CSEL 64:266–267

Audi pugnantem apostolum Paulum aduersus gentem Chananaeorum: uideo, inquit, legem carnis meae repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuantem me in lege peccati. nunc se erigit caro nostra, nunc deicit; erigit menti, deicit potestati et, ubi se urgeri uiderit, constantiam deserit et ad subiectionem parata ducitur in lege peccati, ut fidem deserat, perfidiae succumbat et Chettaeae infirmitatis in dicione destituta uero cedat mendacio, seruiat crimini, adquiescat errori et tamquam Amorraeus loquatur amara pro dulcibus; fides enim dulcis, amara perfidia est. unde praeclare Petrus, quid fides esset, expressit dicens: domine, ad quem ibimus? uerba uitae aeternae habes, et nos credimus. quomodo igitur iubes ut discedamus a te? captus enim caelestium suauitate uerborum discedere nolebat a Christo; qui autem negat Christum, ipse se separat uel separatur a Christo.

Hear the apostle Paul fighting against the nation of the Canaanites: “I see,” he says, “a law of my flesh warring against the law of my mind and taking me captive in the law of sin.” Now our flesh lifts itself up, now casts itself down; it lifts itself against the mind, casts itself down before power, and when it sees itself pressed, it abandons constancy and, ready for submission, is led in the law of sin, so as to abandon faith, give way to faithlessness, and, left in the dominion of Hittite weakness, yield the truth to falsehood, serve crime, acquiesce in error, and like an Amorite speak bitter things instead of sweet; for faith is sweet, faithlessness bitter. Hence Peter splendidly expressed what faith is, saying: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we believe.” How then do you bid us depart from you? For, captivated by the sweetness of the heavenly words, he did not wish to depart from Christ; but he who denies Christ separates himself, or is separated, from Christ.

43.10.2CSEL 64:267

sed neque uersuta Amorraeorum disputatio, quae per philosophiam nonnullos a ueritate transducit, neque Iebusaeorum turpis abiectio, quae se subicit atque substernit cursum currentibus saecularem, qui non potest esse perpetuus, sed in portis deficit mortis, de quibus exaltatum Dauid propheta se gaudet, neque Cinaeus, qui per suam pecuniam possidetur sicut insatiabili auarus affectu, neque Cenezaeus, qui putat in diuitiis possessionem esse perpetuam et uanam spem constituit in caducis atque inani opinione se iactat, neque Raphaim, qui profitetur aliis se ferre medicinam, cum uulnera sua curare non possit.

But neither the crafty disputation of the Amorites, which by philosophy leads some away from the truth; nor the base dejection of the Jebusites, which submits and prostrates itself to those running the course of the world, which cannot be lasting but fails at the gates of death, above which the prophet David rejoices to have been lifted up; nor the Kenite, who is possessed by his money, as the miser is by insatiable desire; nor the Kenizzite, who thinks that in riches there is a lasting possession, and sets vain hope on perishing things and boasts in empty opinion; nor the Rephaim, who professes to bring medicine to others, though he cannot heal his own wounds.

43.10.3CSEL 64:267–268

et ideo, si quis ad huiusmodi medicum confugerit, prius necesse est patrimonium suum omne consumat quam profectum sanitatis accipiat, sicut illa mulier in euangelio, quae per duodecim annos fluentem sanguinem corporalium uoluptatum statuere non potuit, nisi posteaquam confugit ad Christum. intellexit enim, quod nemo perfectus medicus nisi qui descendisset e caelo, de quo cognouerat dictum: misit uerbum suum et sanauit eos, et aduertit de ipso dictum: ecce dedi uerba mea in os tuum et constitui te hodie super gentes et regna, eradicare et destruere et perdere et aedificare et plantare. nam licet frequenter deus locutus sit in prophetis, in quo tamen expressius quam suo locutus in filio est, qui uirtutem omnem exprimens patris ait: mea doctrina non est mea sed eius qui me misit? non ergo Hieremias, qui tempore captiuitatis suscepit exilium, sed dominus Iesus suis uerbis eradicauit ex intimis pectoribus uitia gentilium, perfidiam nationum et uersutarum cogitationum praua commenta destruxit atque omnia uestigia iniquitatis aboleuit. deinde infudit postea fidem et continentiae disciplinam, ne tamquam in uase corrupto confusione uitiorum coacescerent sacramenta uirtutum.

And therefore, if anyone flees to a physician of this kind, he must first spend all his patrimony before he receives any progress in health, like that woman in the gospel who for twelve years could not stop the flowing blood of bodily pleasures until after she fled to Christ. For she understood that no one is a perfect physician except him who had come down from heaven, of whom she had known it said: “He sent his word and healed them”; and she noticed that it was said of him: “See, I have put my words in your mouth and set you this day over nations and kingdoms, to uproot and to destroy and to ruin, and to build and to plant.” For although God often spoke in the prophets, yet in whom did he speak more expressly than in his own Son, who, expressing all the power of the Father, says: “My teaching is not mine, but his who sent me”? So it was not Jeremiah, who underwent exile at the time of the captivity, but the Lord Jesus who by his words uprooted the vices of the gentiles from their inmost hearts, destroyed the faithlessness of the nations and the depraved inventions of crafty thoughts, and abolished all traces of iniquity. Then afterwards he poured in faith and the discipline of continence, so that the sacraments of the virtues should not turn sour, as in a spoiled vessel, by the confusion of vices.

Explanation 43, chapter 11

43.11.1CSEL 64:268

Unde pulchre tibi apostolus dicit: sed regnauit mors ab Adam usque ad Moyse. quid est Moyses nisi lex, quoniam ipse interpres est legis? finis autem legis Christus Iesus. regnauit ergo peccatum in hoc mundo et in peccato mors saeua atque intolerabilis quaedam poena peccati. docuit quidem nos Moyses leuare ad dominum manus, pii cultus instituens disciplinam.

Hence the apostle rightly says to you: “But death reigned from Adam to Moses.” What is Moses but the law, since he himself is the interpreter of the law? But the end of the law is Christ Jesus. Sin, then, reigned in this world, and in sin death, a cruel and unbearable punishment of sin. Moses indeed taught us to lift up our hands to the Lord, establishing the discipline of pious worship.

43.11.2CSEL 64:268

docuit quemadmodum Amalec uersutilocus uinceretur, ut mores nostros et opera leuaremus ad Christum; sic destrui posse perfidiam; sin uero deiceremus animam, inclinaremus affectum et a continentiae studio auerteremus ingenium, ut persuasio nos uana superaret, nullum

He taught how Amalek, the crafty-tongued, was to be conquered: that we should lift up our ways of life and our works to Christ; so faithlessness could be destroyed. But if we let our soul sink, bent down our affection, and turned our mind away from the pursuit of continence, so that vain persuasion overcame us, there would be no

43.11.3CSEL 64:268–269

remedium futurum, nisi Iesus depressa iam brachia Moysi tamquam infirmitatem legis attolleret et sua misericordia sustineret. sed infirmum adhuc fuisset legis auxilium, nisi ipse Iesus uenisset in terras, qui in se nostras susciperet infirmitates, quem solum nostra peccata grauare non possent nec inclinare manus eius, qui se inclinauit usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis, in qua expandens manus suas totum orbem qui erat periturus erexit, leuauit iacentes atque ad se omnium gentium fidem traxit dicens homini: hodie mecum eris in paradiso. hoc est ergo disperdere atque plantare, ut uitiosa eradicentur, meliora plantentur in pectoribus singulorum.

remedy to come, unless Jesus lifted up the arms of Moses, already sinking, as being the weakness of the law, and sustained them by his mercy. But the help of the law would still have been weak, had not Jesus himself come to earth, to take upon himself our weaknesses, whom alone our sins could not weigh down nor make his hands sink, he who humbled himself to death, even the death of the cross, on which, stretching out his hands, he raised up the whole world that was about to perish, lifted up those lying down, and drew to himself the faith of all nations, saying to a man: “Today you will be with me in paradise.” This, then, is to destroy and to plant: that vices be uprooted and better things planted in the hearts of each.

43.11.4CSEL 64:269

de quo praeclare Moyses in Exodi cantico ait: inducens planta eos in montem hereditatis tuae, in praeparatum habitaculum tuum, petens ut induceret dominus populum suum in illa praecelsae uirtutis sapientiaeque plantaria ibique plantaretur in opera sua et institueretur praeceptorum caelestium disciplinis atque in eo praepararet sibi suae sanctificationis habitaculum, quod utique non hereditario iure nec nostrorum contemplatione meritorum, sed pro sua gratia dominus conferre dignatur. quomodo enim, ubi remanere non potuimus, eo redire possemus nisi priuilegio fulti redemptionis aeternae?

Of this Moses splendidly says in the song of Exodus: “Bringing them in, plant them in the mountain of your inheritance, in your prepared dwelling”, asking that the Lord would bring his people into those nurseries of high virtue and wisdom and plant it there in his works and train it in the disciplines of the heavenly commandments, and prepare in it a dwelling of his sanctification, which the Lord deigns to grant not by hereditary right nor in view of our merits, but by his grace. For how could we return to the place where we could not remain, unless supported by the privilege of eternal redemption?

Explanation 43, chapter 12

43.12.1CSEL 64:269

Et ideo pulchre dixit propheta: quoniam non in gladio suo possederunt terram et brachium suum non liberauit eos, sed dextera tua et brachium tuum et inluminatio uultus tui, quoniam complacuit tibi in illis. quae est igitur terra, quae non brachio capiatur, non gladio possideatur, nisi terra repromissionis, de qua hic ipse dixit propheta: credo uidere bona domini in terra uiuentium? non inmerito igitur eius tam praeclara possessio est, in qua non saeculi aduersa dominantur, sed domini bona aeterna fructificant.

And therefore the prophet rightly said: “For they did not possess the land by their own sword, and their own arm did not free them, but your right hand and your arm and the light of your countenance, because you were well pleased with them.” What, then, is the land which is not taken by the arm nor possessed by the sword, unless the land of promise, of which this same prophet said: “I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living”? Not undeservedly, then, is its possession so glorious, in which the adversities of the world do not rule, but the eternal good things of the Lord bear fruit.

43.12.2CSEL 64:269–270

ideoque non gladio adquiritur, sed mansuetudine possidetur, sicut dominus Iesus testificatus est dicens: beati mites. ipsi enim possidebunt terram. nemo ergo inpacificus, nemo arrogans aut superbus, sed mansuetus et humilis corde, qui nihil sibi arroget, sed totum ad gratiam referat, non in sua fortitudine glorietur, sed dextera dei credat se esse protectum dicens: dextera domini fecit uirtutem, dextera domini exaltauit me, gladio quoque dei memoret se esse seruatum, inluminat quoque dei uultu omnipotentis;

And therefore it is not acquired by the sword but possessed by gentleness, as the Lord Jesus testified, saying: “Blessed are the meek, for they shall possess the land.” So let no one be unpeaceful, no one arrogant or proud, but gentle and humble of heart, claiming nothing for himself but referring all to grace, not glorying in his own strength, but believing that he is protected by the right hand of God, saying: “The right hand of the Lord has done mightily, the right hand of the Lord has exalted me”; let him recall too that he has been kept safe by the sword of God and by the light of the countenance of almighty God;

43.12.3CSEL 64:270

in quibus omnibus Christus est protector, dextera, defensor et gladius. unde et Symeon dixit ad Mariam: et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius. gladius enim dei uerbum est, quod acutius omni gladio usque ad diuisiones animae cogitationesque pertransit, ut nulla cognitionem eius occulta praetereant. uultus quoque paterni splendor est Christus et ideo dicit: qui me uidet, uidet et patrem, quasi splendor gloriae eius et imago substantiae.

in all of which Christ is the protector, the right hand, the defender and the sword. Hence Simeon too said to Mary: “And a sword will pierce through your own soul.” For the sword is the word of God, which, sharper than any sword, pierces to the divisions of soul and thoughts, so that nothing hidden escapes its knowledge. Christ is also the brightness of the Father’s countenance, and therefore he says: “He who sees me sees the Father also”, as the brightness of his glory and the image of his substance.

43.12.4CSEL 64:270

ad ipsum ergo omnia iure referenda sunt. ipsi Moyses, ipsi Aaron, ipsi etiam patres sacrabant uniuersa quae gesserant, ut de hostibus triumpharent. neque enim in sua confidentia dixit Iesus Naue: stet sol contra Gabaon, sed quia praesumebat in Christo, quem ducem militiae caelestis agnouit et suppliciter adorauit. et ideo gentes feras eradicare promeruit et populum patrum in terram repromissionis inducere, quia nihil suis operibus deputabat, credens indigna esse opera hominum tanta gloriae remuneratione caelestis, quam dominus

To him, then, all things must rightly be referred. To him Moses, to him Aaron, to him the fathers too consecrated all that they had done, in order to triumph over their enemies. For it was not in his own confidence that Jesus son of Nave said: “Let the sun stand still over Gibeon”, but because he presumed upon Christ, whom he recognized as leader of the heavenly army and worshipped as a suppliant. And therefore he was found worthy to uproot fierce nations and bring the people of the fathers into the land of promise, because he attributed nothing to his own works, believing that the works of men are unworthy of so great a reward of heavenly glory, which the Lord

43.12.5CSEL 64:270–271

ex sua magis misericordia quam pro nostrorum contemplatione factorum statuit in se credentibus conferendam. unde et Abraham inpigre deo credidit, ut apud eum iustificationis gratiam repperiret quam mercedem sui operis collocaret; uberiora enim dona sunt largientis quam merces operantis. propterea et illi, qui aequalitatem mercedis inuiderat, respondit dominus: si ego bonus, oculus tuus quare nequam? patres ergo nostri, utpote proximi et heredes patriarcharum, plantati in terra repromissionis non suis hoc meritis uindicabant.

has determined to bestow on those who believe in him out of his own mercy rather than in consideration of our deeds. Hence Abraham too promptly believed God, so as to find with him the grace of justification, rather than to place it as the wage of his work; for the gifts of the giver are richer than the wage of the worker. Therefore to that man who had begrudged the equality of the wage the Lord replied: “If I am good, why is your eye evil?” Our fathers, then, as neighbours and heirs of the patriarchs, planted in the land of promise, did not claim this by their own merits.

43.12.6CSEL 64:271

ideo nec Moyses eos induxit, ne legis hoc aestimetur esse, sed gratiae; lex enim merita examinat, gratia fidem spectat. unde praeclare apostolus fidem patrum secutus ait: sed neque qui plantat est quicquam neque qui rigat, sed qui dat incrementum deus. non enim Iesus Naue, quia induxit neque quia plantauit eos, sed deus, qui incrementum populo dedit, habet gloriae principatum.

Therefore Moses did not bring them in either, so that this should not be thought to be of the law but of grace; for the law examines merits, grace looks to faith. Hence the apostle, following the faith of the fathers, splendidly says: “Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth.” For it is not Jesus son of Nave, because he brought them in or because he planted them, but God, who gave the people growth, who has the primacy of glory.

Explanation 43, chapter 13

43.13.1CSEL 64:271

Nec te moueat, quia superius dixit: manus tua gentes disperdidit, et plantasti eos. hinc enim colligis, quia non omnis qui plantat aut qui rigat incrementum dat, sed qui incrementum potest dare potest ipse plantare, sicut gentes plantasse dicitur dominus. ipse enim plantauit qui plantationi donauit effectum, in his tamen qui per fidem Christi domino placere meruerunt, cui soli a patre dicitur deo: filius meus tu es, in te complacui.

And do not be troubled because he said above: “Your hand destroyed the nations, and you planted them.” From this you gather that not everyone who plants or waters gives the growth, but he who can give the growth can himself plant, as the Lord is said to have planted the nations. For he planted who gave effect to the planting, yet in those who were found worthy through the faith of Christ to please the Lord, to whom alone as God it is said by the Father: “You are my Son, in you I am well pleased.”

43.13.2CSEL 64:271

qui ergo participes Christi sunt, ab eo placendi gratiam consecuntur. et pulchre ait: complacuit tibi in illis, ut distantia uideatur iure seruata. recte enim deus in filio complacet, quia aequalis est patri nec in ullo decolor inuenitur, quia complacet diuinae iure naturae et unitate substantiae. et recte complacet in filio pater, quia pater honorificatur in filio sicut in patre filius. in nobis autem deo complacuit, quia nobis ipse donauit, ut ei placere possimus. pie autem et hoc homini specialiter donatum, non arrogantius usurpatum scriptura nos docuit.

Those, then, who are partakers of Christ obtain from him the grace of pleasing. And beautifully he says: “You were well pleased with them”, so that the distinction seems rightly kept. For rightly God is well pleased in the Son, because he is equal to the Father and found unlike in nothing, because he is well pleasing by right of the divine nature and by unity of substance. And rightly the Father is well pleased in the Son, because the Father is honoured in the Son as the Son in the Father. But with us God was well pleased, because he himself gave us the power to please him. And Scripture has taught us that this too was piously given to man as a special gift, not arrogantly usurped.

43.13.3CSEL 64:271–272

decet enim, ut in his complaceat deo, quos ad similitudinem suam fecit et quos per imaginem suam uoluit praerogatiuam gratiae habere caelestis. in imagine ergo sua deus complacet, in his autem, qui secundum imaginem ipsius sunt, complacet deo. in his autem suum munus et suum donum, quod tunc reuelabitur, cum perfectum illud aduenerit, quia, cum apparuerit quid simus, similes ei erimus, ut scriptum est.

For it is fitting that he should be well pleased with those whom he made to his likeness and whom through his image he wished to have the privilege of heavenly grace. So God is well pleased in his Image, and in those who are according to his image he is well pleased. In them is his gift and his present, which will be revealed when that which is perfect has come, because, when it appears what we are, we shall be like him, as it is written.

Explanation 43, chapter 14

43.14.1CSEL 64:272

Ergo qui non in brachio suo, hoc est in sua operatione praesumit, sed in dei gratia, credens quod non facta sua unumquemque iustificant, sed fides prompta, dicit domino: tu es ipse rex meus et deus meus, qui mandas salutes Iacob. non perfunctorius sermo est, ut dicas: tu es ipse rex meus. non quicumque hoc dicit, sed in quo dei regnum est, in quo autem regnat deus, utique in eo peccata non regnant; non enim deo regnum est commune cum crimine.

So he who presumes not on his own arm, that is, on his own working, but on the grace of God, believing that it is not one’s own deeds that justify each one but ready faith, says to the Lord: “You are yourself my king and my God, who command the salvations of Jacob.” It is no casual saying, that you should say: “You are yourself my king.” Not anyone who says this, but the one in whom the kingdom of God is; and in whom God reigns, sins certainly do not reign; for God has no kingdom in common with crime.

43.14.2CSEL 64:272

quis autem dicit deum suum nisi qui ipsi exhibet plenum reuerentiae et pietatis affectum? iusto enim dicitur: ego sum deus tuus. denique et Thomas, ubi tetigit manu propria latus Christi et euidentia indicia indubitatae resurrectionis inuenit, respondit: dominus meus et deus meus;

And who calls God his own except one who shows him a disposition full of reverence and piety? For to the righteous it is said: “I am your God.” Finally Thomas too, when he touched Christ’s side with his own hand and found the evident marks of an undoubted resurrection, answered: “My Lord and my God”;

43.14.3CSEL 64:272

dominus, quia redemit seruulos suos, deus, quia non solum resurrexit, sed etiam ipse se suscitauit. mandauit autem salutes Iacob, quia in singulis oraculis salus est, in singulis quoque salus est mansionibus, salus in ministeriis angelorum qui ad protectionem hominum deputantur. ex mandato ergo dei salus homini, non ex sua operatione confertur. deus enim maluit, ut salus homini fide potius quam operibus quaereretur, ne quis gloriaretur in suis factis et peccatum incurreret. qui autem gloriatur in domino, fructum pietatis adquirit et iactantiae crimen euadit.

Lord, because he redeemed his servants; God, because he not only rose again but also raised himself. And he commanded the salvations of Jacob, because in each oracle there is salvation, in each of the dwellings there is salvation, salvation in the ministries of the angels who are appointed for the protection of men. So salvation is given to man by the command of God, not from his own working. For God preferred that salvation should be sought by man through faith rather than works, lest anyone should glory in his deeds and incur sin. But he who glories in the Lord gains the fruit of piety and escapes the crime of boasting.

Explanation 43, chapter 15

43.15.1CSEL 64:272–273

Hic igitur est qui potest dicere: in te inimicos nostros uentilabimus. quid est uentilare? dedit dominus cornua pluribus animantibus, ut possint se a ferarum incursione defendere. ideoque et bos leoni frequenter resistit, ursum proterit; ceruus quoque, quamuis sit pauidus, tamen et ipse cornibus se tuetur, aries quoque arietat lupum. ergo ea quae cornua habent animalia uentilare dicuntur. sed homo cornua non habet: quomodo ergo uentilat?

This, then, is the one who can say: “In you we will toss our enemies.” What is “to toss”? The Lord gave horns to many animals, so that they might defend themselves from the attack of wild beasts. And so the ox often resists the lion and tramples the bear; the stag too, although timid, yet protects itself with its horns; the ram too butts the wolf. So those animals that have horns are said to toss. But man has no horns: how, then, does he toss?

43.15.2CSEL 64:273

unde uide scriptura quid dicat: in te, inquit, inimicos nostros uentilabimus. cornu nostrum es tu, domine Iesu, et ideo, sicut non in brachio nostro praesumimus, ita non in cornibus nostris uentilandi habemus praesidium, sed in Christo. habet enim fides cornua sua, quae mutuatur a Christo. siquidem non otiose in benedictionibus Moysi legimus: qui est uisus in rubo ueniat super caput Ioseph et super uerticem eius glorificatus inter fratres suos primogenitus. tauri decus [species] ipsius, cornua unicornui cornua ipsius; in ipsis gentes uentilabit simul usque ad extremum terrae. haec decem milia Ephraem et haec milia Manasse.

See, then, what Scripture says: “In you,” it says, “we will toss our enemies.” You are our horn, Lord Jesus; and therefore, just as we do not presume on our own arm, so we do not have the protection for tossing in our own horns, but in Christ. For faith has its own horns, which it borrows from Christ. Indeed, not idly do we read in the blessings of Moses: “May he who was seen in the bush come upon the head of Joseph, and upon his crown, glorified among his brothers, the firstborn. The beauty of a bull is his; the horns of the unicorn are his horns; with them he will toss the nations together to the end of the earth. These are the ten thousands of Ephraim and these the thousands of Manasseh.”

43.15.3CSEL 64:273

quis est in rubo uisus Moysi nisi primogenitus dei filius, qui ait: ego sum deus patrum tuorum, deus Abraham, deus Isaac, deus Iacob? ideo se demonstrauit humanis aspectibus, quia uenturus erat, ut ab omnibus uideretur. ideo rubus urebatur et non exurebatur, quia terram istam, quae nobis spinas germinabat et sentes, disponebat urere per continentiae disciplinam. quam consumere per mortis aerumnam. unde dicit propheta: ure renes meos et cor meum.

Who is the one seen by Moses in the bush but the firstborn Son of God, who says: “I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob”? Therefore he showed himself to human sight, because he was to come so as to be seen by all. Therefore the bush burned and was not burnt up, because he was disposing to burn this earth, which was sprouting thorns and briars for us, through the discipline of continence, rather than to consume it through the misery of death. Hence the prophet says: “Burn my reins and my heart.”

43.15.4CSEL 64:273–274

reuelauit ergo futurum quoddam corporei splendoris indicium, quo per resurrectionem caro ista fulgeret. quid enim significabat ignis innoxius nisi lumina resurgentium? unde praesumpsit apostolus dicere, quia, sicut stella a stella differt in claritate, ita et resurrectio mortuorum. hic ergo, inquit, ueniat super caput tribus Ioseph, ut exaltet caput populi sui, ueniat etiam super uerticem, ut uerticem capilli perambulet amputaturus superflua delictorum, sanctificaturus ornamenta uirtutum.

So he revealed a certain sign of the future splendour of the body, by which this flesh would shine through the resurrection. For what did the harmless fire signify but the lights of those who rise again? Hence the apostle ventured to say that, as star differs from star in brightness, so also is the resurrection of the dead. “Let him come,” then, he says, “upon the head” of the tribe of Joseph, to exalt the head of his people; let him come also upon the crown, to pass over the crown of the hair, to cut away the superfluities of sins and to sanctify the adornments of virtues.

Explanation 43, chapter 16

43.16.1CSEL 64:274

Hic est glorificatus inter fratres suos, sicut ipse dicit: narrabo nomen tuum fratribus meis. quae maior est gloria quam pectoribus nationum cognitionem diuinitatis infundere? quem in uisione uidit Ioseph, quod manipulum eius adorarent fratrum manipuli, adoraret eum sol et luna cum stellis. manipulus ille in figura carnis accipitur; omnis enim caro faenum. fae-

This is he who was glorified among his brothers, as he himself says: “I will tell your name to my brothers.” What greater glory than to pour the knowledge of the Godhead into the hearts of the nations? It was he whom Joseph saw in his vision, that his brothers’ sheaves bowed down to his sheaf, and that the sun and moon with the stars bowed down to him. That sheaf is taken as a figure of the flesh; for all flesh is grass. He took up

43.16.2CSEL 64:274

num suscepit hoc nostrum, ut suum triticum germinaret et fructum resurrectionis afferret. quaeris testimonium? audi de se dicentem: nisi granum tritici cadens in terram moriatur, ipsum solum manet; si autem mortuum fuerit, multum fructum afferet. denique ut scias, quia de dei filio dicit Moyses, ait: glorificatus inter fratres suos primogenitus. utique non Ioseph erat primogenitus inter filios Iacob, sed Ruben; nam Ioseph post plurimos erat. sed primogenitus dicitur qui uenturus erat, ut nationum populos congregaret.

this grass of ours, so that it might sprout his wheat and bring the fruit of resurrection. Do you seek a testimony? Hear him saying of himself: “Unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it will bear much fruit.” Finally, so that you may know that Moses speaks of the Son of God, he says: “Glorified among his brothers, the firstborn.” Certainly Joseph was not the firstborn among the sons of Jacob, but Reuben; for Joseph came after very many. But he is called firstborn who was to come to gather the peoples of the nations.

Explanation 43, chapter 17

43.17.1CSEL 64:274

Unde pulchre ait scriptura: tauri decus eius. sicut enim taurus ducit armentum, ita Christus plebem gentium duxit ad ecclesiam, induxit ad pascua, ut posset dicere: in locum pascuae, ibi me conlocauit; Super aquam refectionis constituit me. huius tauri decorem pro captu nostrae fragilitatis armenta secuta sunt praecedentem, ut uitam adipiscerentur aeternam. mugiuit hic taurus et mors refugit.

Hence Scripture beautifully says: “The beauty of a bull is his.” For as the bull leads the herd, so Christ led the people of the nations to the church, led them into pasture, so that it could say: “In a place of pasture, there he has set me; by the water of refreshment he has placed me.” The herds, as far as our frailty allows, have followed the beauty of this bull as he went before, to obtain eternal life. This bull bellowed, and death fled.

43.17.2CSEL 64:274–275

leo rugit, et quis non timet? uere maxima taurus uictima, ut ab aduersariis assumamus testimonia; quae maior enim uictima quam quae mundi totius peccatum suo cruore mundauit? audi, quia ipsum taurum dicit etiam sanctus propheta Iacob, cum reuelaret domini passionem, quem Iudaei postea persecuti sunt: in furore, inquit, suo subneruauerunt taurum. et ut aperiret, quia de Iudaeis dicebat, addidit: diuidam eos in Iacob et dispergam in Israel.

“The lion roars, and who will not fear?” Truly the bull is the greatest victim, to take a testimony from our adversaries; for what greater victim than the one that cleansed the sin of the whole world with its blood? Hear that the holy prophet Jacob too calls him a bull, when he revealed the passion of the Lord, whom the Jews afterwards persecuted: “In their fury,” he says, “they hamstrung the bull”; and to make it clear that he spoke of the Jews, he added: “I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel.”

43.17.3CSEL 64:275

hic est homo qui luctatus est cum Iacob et femur eius tetigit, quo tactu patriarchae neruus obstupuit, significans ex eius successione secundum carnem se esse uenturum, qui subneruandus esset a populo Iudaeorum in sui corporis passione. quod non intellegentes mysterium statuerunt, ne neruum manducarent filii Israel.

This is the man who wrestled with Jacob and touched his thigh, at whose touch the sinew of the patriarch grew numb, signifying that he would come from his descendants according to the flesh, he who was to be hamstrung by the people of the Jews in the passion of his body. Not understanding this mystery, they decreed that the sons of Israel should not eat the sinew.

43.17.4CSEL 64:275

et ideo sacri sanguinis se redemptione fraudarunt, salutiferae quoque passionis se beneficiis abdicauerunt, ne uitam mereantur aeternam, quia scriptum est: nisi manducaueritis carnem filii hominis et biberitis eius sanguinem, non habebitis uitam in uobis ipsis. qui autem manducat meam carnem et bibit meum sanguinem, habebit uitam aeternam. accipe aliud.

And therefore they cheated themselves of the redemption of the sacred blood and renounced the benefits of the saving passion, so as not to be found worthy of eternal life, because it is written: “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you will not have life in yourselves. But he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood will have eternal life.” Take another meaning.

43.17.5CSEL 64:275

quid est neruus nisi quo corpus omne constringitur? corpus Christi ecclesia est, quae uinculo stringitur caritatis. quid aliud in Christo Iudaei nisi caritatis uinculum omne soluerunt? merito Petrus sacerdos eligitur, qui spiritu caritatis diuinae triplici se ligauit.

What is the sinew but that by which the whole body is bound together? The body of Christ is the church, which is bound by the bond of love. What else did the Jews do in Christ but loosen every bond of love? Rightly Peter is chosen as priest, who bound himself with the threefold spirit of divine love.

Explanation 43, chapter 18

43.18.1CSEL 64:275–276

Accipe adhuc, quia ipsum significauit Moyses. adiecit: cornua unicornui cornua ipsius; in ipsis gentes uentilabit. sed noli timere quia uentilat; dixit enim: percutiam et sanabo. bona cornua, quibus inclusit orbem terrarum; bona cornua, quibus leonem illum nostrum aduersarium uentilauit; bona cornua, quibus fecit ut cornua aduersarii timere nequeamus, quia et satanas habet cornua sua, sicut testificatus est Danihel dicens: uidebam et cornu illud quod faciebat pugnam cum sanctis, et inualescebat eis, donec uenit antiquus dierum.

Take it further that Moses signified him. He added: “The horns of the unicorn are his horns; with them he will toss the nations.” But do not fear that he tosses; for he said: “I will strike and I will heal.” Good horns, with which he enclosed the world; good horns, with which he tossed that lion our adversary; good horns, with which he brought it about that we need not fear the horns of the adversary; for Satan too has his horns, as Daniel testified, saying: “I saw, and that horn made war with the saints and prevailed over them, until the Ancient of Days came.”

43.18.2CSEL 64:276

hic est antiquus dierum. quis autem unicornuus nisi unigenitus dei filius et unicum dei uerbum, quod erat in principio apud patrem? quod uerbum suis cornibus gentium populos mortificauit et uiuificauit, ut fierent in decem milia Ephraem usque ad terminos terrae et usque in milia Manasse, eo quod crediturus esset in eum populus nationum, qui totum repleret orbem terrarum, crediturus esset postea etiam populus Iudaeorum ex obliuione conuersus ad gratiam; oblitus est enim salutem suam, qui tam sero conuerteretur ad Christum. ideo Saul in milibus, Dauid in decem milibus, quia durus in paucis, mansuetus in pluribus.

He is the Ancient of Days. And who is the unicorn but the only-begotten Son of God and the only Word of God, which was in the beginning with the Father? This Word with his horns put to death and gave life to the peoples of the nations, so that they became the ten thousands of Ephraim to the ends of the earth and the thousands of Manasseh, because the people of the nations would believe in him and fill the whole world, and afterwards the people of the Jews too would believe, turned from forgetfulness to grace; for it has forgotten its salvation, since it would be converted to Christ so late. Therefore Saul in thousands, David in ten thousands, because he is harsh in few, gentle in more.

Explanation 43, chapter 19

43.19.1CSEL 64:276

Neque tamen abnuo, si quis quasi ad Ioseph dictum putat: primogenitus tauri decus eius et sic distinguendum putat, quia dedit et sanctis suis cornua. exaltauit enim cornua populi sui, et Anna mater prophetae Samuhel dicit: exultauit cor meum in domino, exaltatum est cornu meum in deo meo. habuit utique et Ioseph in domino cornua spiritalia. accipiatur itaque Ioseph, dummodo in ipso figura sit Christi, cui dicitur:. Ioseph filius meus amplificatus, filius meus iunior; ad me reuertere.

Yet I do not refuse if anyone thinks it was said to Joseph: “The firstborn, the beauty of a bull is his”, and thinks it should be divided thus, because he gave horns to his saints too. For he exalted the horns of his people, and Hannah, mother of the prophet Samuel, says: “My heart has exulted in the Lord, my horn is exalted in my God.” Joseph too certainly had spiritual horns in the Lord. So let it be taken of Joseph, provided that in him there is a figure of Christ, to whom it is said: “Joseph my son increased, my younger son; return to me.”

43.19.2CSEL 64:276–277

neque enim Ioseph ad Iacob reuertitur, sed Christus a mortuis resuscitatus ad patrem deum reuertitur, ut scriptum est: a summo caelo egressio eius et occursus eius usque ad summum eius. est tamen ut de Ioseph accipiatur: reuertere ad me, quia populus reuertitur in terram Chananaeorum, in quibus ante habitauerant patriarchae. unde dicit Isaac ad Iacob: non accipies uxorem a filiabus Chananaeorum et mittit eum in Mesopotamiam, ut ibi sibi coniugem repperiret. numquid ei insidiati sunt domini sagittarum?

For it is not Joseph who returns to Jacob, but Christ, raised from the dead, returns to God the Father, as it is written: “His going out is from the highest heaven, and his meeting is to its highest point.” Yet it may be taken of Joseph: “Return to me”, because the people returns to the land of the Canaanites, in which the patriarchs had lived before. Hence Isaac says to Jacob: “You shall not take a wife from the daughters of the Canaanites”, and sends him to Mesopotamia to find a wife there. Did the lords of the arrows lie in wait for him?

43.19.3CSEL 64:277

numquid ipse - propter benedictionem uteri materni - in toto orbe benedictus est et non dominus Iesus, quem uirgo generauit? et ideo non solum super homines, sed etiam supra angelos et archangelos et supra omnem sublimitatem caelestium benedictus est potestatum, sicut scriptura testatur dicens benedictus qui uenit in nomine domini; deus dominus et inluxit nobis. dominus enim deus ipse est rex regum et dominus dominantium in his quae habentur in caelis.

Was he — because of the blessing of his mother’s womb — blessed in the whole world, and not the Lord Jesus, whom a virgin bore? And therefore he is blessed not only above men but also above angels and archangels and above every height of the heavenly powers, as Scripture testifies, saying: “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord; the Lord is God, and he has shone upon us.” For the Lord God himself is King of kings and Lord of lords in the things that are in heaven.

43.19.4CSEL 64:277

propter haec cornua domini Iesu et Dauid in uoce tubae corneae canens auditus a Christo est et Moyses docuit sacrificiorum ritus tubae sonitu esse celebrandos, sicut scriptum est: canite initio mensis tuba. cui hoc nisi nobis scriptum est? menses enim ab initio lunae ueteres obseruare consuerant. luna autem ecclesia est, quae spiritalibus et euangelicis praedicationibus in abundantia pacis, ut propheta dixit, extollitur. in Christo ergo uentilabimus inimicos nostros.

Because of these horns of the Lord Jesus, David too, singing with the sound of the horn trumpet, was heard by Christ, and Moses taught that the rites of the sacrifices were to be celebrated with the sound of the trumpet, as it is written: “Sound the trumpet at the beginning of the month.” For whom was this written but for us? For the ancients used to observe the months from the beginning of the moon. And the moon is the church, which is lifted up by spiritual and gospel preaching in abundance of peace, as the prophet said. In Christ, then, we will toss our enemies.

Explanation 43, chapter 20

43.20.1CSEL 64:277

Et in nomine eius spernemus insurgentes in nos. quod est nomen nisi quo proprie unusquisque significatur, quod ei non sit commune cum ceteris? homo enim commune uocabulum est; nisi addas qui uocetur, non potest declarari. nomen ergo proprietas uniuscuiusque est, quo possit intellegi. unde arbitror quod et Moyses, uolens propria dei et aliquid de eo speciale cognoscere quod non esset commune cum caelestibus potestatibus. interrogauit: quod est nomen tuum?

“And in his name we will despise those who rise up against us.” What is a name but that by which each one is properly signified, which he does not have in common with the rest? For “man” is a common word; unless you add what he is called, he cannot be made known. A name, then, is the property of each one, by which he can be understood. Hence I think that Moses too, wishing to know the properties of God and something special about him that was not common with the heavenly powers, asked: “What is your name?”

43.20.2CSEL 64:277–278

denique cognoscens mentem eius deus non respondit nomen, sed negotium, hoc est rem expressit, non appellationem dicens: ego sum qui sum, quia nihil tam proprium dei quam semper esse. qui ergo negant Christum coaeternum patri, uideant quia deum negant, cuius est semper esse nec aliquando non fuisse. hac ergo cognitione proprietatis diuinae Moyses insurgentes in se uolebat spernere uel, ut Aquilas aut Symmachus dixerunt, calcare resistentes sibi tamquam serpentes et scorpiones, quos etiam dominus dicit in euan-

Finally, God, knowing his mind, did not answer with a name but with the thing, that is, he expressed the reality, not an appellation, saying: “I am who I am”, because nothing is so proper to God as always to be. Let those, then, who deny that Christ is co-eternal with the Father see that they deny God, whose property it is always to be and never at any time not to have been. With this knowledge of the divine property, then, Moses wished to despise those who rose up against him, or, as Aquila or Symmachus said, to trample those who resisted him like serpents and scorpions, which the Lord too says in the gospel

43.20.3CSEL 64:278

gelio esse spiritalibus uestigiis proterendos, ut uiam nostram impedire non possint, quae ducit ad secreta paradisi. habemus ergo in nobis studium diuinae cognitionis, habemus dei uerbum, quod est nomen patris. haec uere proprietas dei, quia pater Christi est, et ideo in nomine patris uenit qui uenit ut patris faceret uoluntatem. et ideo ait: in nomine patris ueni et non me suscepistis; si alius uenerit in nomine suo, illum suscipietis, significans Iudaeos in antichristum credituros, qui in Christum credere noluerunt. ergo qui in Christum credit, non in arcu suo nec gladio suo sperat, sed in nomine eius spem uictoriae locat.

are to be trampled with spiritual footsteps, so that they cannot hinder our way, which leads to the secrets of paradise. We have in us, then, the pursuit of divine knowledge; we have the Word of God, which is the name of the Father. This truly is the property of God, that he is the Father of Christ; and therefore he who came to do the Father’s will came in the name of the Father. And therefore he says: “I have come in my Father’s name, and you did not receive me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive”, signifying that the Jews, who would not believe in Christ, would believe in the Antichrist. So he who believes in Christ hopes not in his own bow nor in his own sword, but places the hope of victory in his name.

Explanation 43, chapter 21

43.21.1CSEL 64:278

Et ideo ait: non enim in arcu meo sperabo et gladius meus non saluabit me, etsi in arcu sperandum est, sed in dei arcu quem posuit in nube, ut a diluuio genus humanum timere desineret. isto arcu nos protegit, quo arcu et iaculatur sagittas, quibus percutiat inimicos et aduersarios nostros.

And therefore he says: “For I will not hope in my bow, and my sword will not save me”; though there is hope to be placed in a bow, but in God’s bow, which he set in the cloud so that the human race might cease to fear the flood. With this bow he protects us, the bow with which he also shoots the arrows with which he strikes our enemies and adversaries.

Explanation 43, chapter 22

43.22.1CSEL 64:278–279

Unde et ait: liberasti enim nos ex affligentibus nos et eos qui oderunt nos confudisti; in deo laudabimur tota die et in nomine tuo confitebimur in saecula l a. audi quomodo nos liberet, quia sagittis quas iaculatur e caelo terrae nostrae interiora penetrantur, ut motus omnis terrenus intereat et quiescat, sicut in posterioribus ait: de caelo iaculatus es iudicium, terra tremuit et quieuit.

Hence he also says: “For you have freed us from those who afflict us and have put to shame those who hated us; in God we shall be praised all the day, and in your name we shall confess for ever.” Hear how he frees us: the inner parts of our earth are pierced by the arrows which he shoots from heaven, so that every earthly movement may die and be still, as he says further on: “From heaven you shot judgment; the earth trembled and was still.”

43.22.2CSEL 64:279

sic igitur liberamur, dum confunduntur inimicae et aduersariae potestates uel sapientia carnis istius retunsa caelestibus imperatis in suis criminibus erubescit et flagitiorum suorum pudore confunditur: adulter in libidinis suae flammis et uaesani amoris incendio, auarus in inmodicae cupiditatis ardore, qui aliena rapiendo, quo plura inuaserit, eo maiora desiderat, ebriosus in temulentia, facinorosus in scelere.

So, then, we are freed when the hostile and adverse powers are put to shame, or when the wisdom of this flesh, beaten back by heavenly commands, blushes in its crimes and is put to shame by its wicked deeds: the adulterer in the flames of his lust and the fire of insane love, the greedy man in the heat of immoderate desire, who, seizing what belongs to others, desires more the more he has seized, the drunkard in his drunkenness, the criminal in his crime.

43.22.3CSEL 64:279

qui et hic confunduntur grauissime, sed multo amplius confundentur, cum uiderint sanctos domini resurgentes et euangelicum illud impleri, quod ait dominus: multi dormientium in terrae monumentis resurgent, isti in uitam aeternam et hi in obprobrium et perpetuam confusionem.

These are put to shame most grievously here too, but they will be put to shame much more when they see the saints of the Lord rising again and that word of the gospel fulfilled which the Lord spoke: “Many of those who sleep in the tombs of the earth will rise again, these to eternal life and those to reproach and everlasting shame.”

Explanation 43, chapter 23

43.23.1CSEL 64:279

Cum coeperint ergo illi resuscitari in confusionem perpetuam, sanctus domini dicet: in deo laudabimur tota die et in nomine tuo confitebimur in saecula. opulentus in diuitiis laudatur, luxuriosus in conuiuiis, scortator in nocte, potens in hac uita quae habet noctes; sanctus autem non in hac uita, sed in deo laudabitur, qui domino per omnia placere gestiuit, qui potest dicere: fortitudo et laudatio mea dominus. laudabitur tota die, quia honeste egit et opera sua non abscondit et crimina, sed regi patefecit aeterno, in die ambulans, non in tenebris et occultis.

When, then, they begin to be raised to everlasting shame, the saint of the Lord will say: “In God we shall be praised all the day, and in your name we shall confess for ever.” The rich man is praised in his riches, the luxurious in his feasts, the fornicator at night, the powerful man in this life, which has nights; but the saint will be praised not in this life but in God, he who has striven to please the Lord in all things, who can say: “The Lord is my strength and my praise.” He will be praised all the day, because he acted honourably and did not hide his works and his offences, but opened them to the eternal King, walking in the day, not in darkness and in secret.

43.23.2CSEL 64:279–280

unde et apostolus: sicut in die honeste ambulemus, hoc est non in ganeis atque gurgustiis, non in cubilibus et inpudicitiis, in quibus flagitiosus putat parietibus se esse tectum, ut possit dei scientiam praeterire, cum inuelata apud deum uniuersorum flagitia sint et occulta diuinae cognitioni peccata hominum esse non possint. ergo sanctus laudabitur in futurum, quia non quaesiuit praesentium laudem, sed gratiam futurorum.

Hence the apostle too: “Let us walk honourably as in the day”, that is, not in taverns and dens, not in beds and impurities, in which the wicked man thinks he is covered by walls, so that he can escape the knowledge of God, though the crimes of all are uncovered before God and the sins of men cannot be hidden from the divine knowledge. So the saint will be praised in the future, because he sought not the praise of present things but the grace of future things.

Explanation 43, chapter 24

43.24.1CSEL 64:280

Uide tamen distantiam. hic dum est, in domino gloriatur, illic in domino laudabitur, pro breui tempore mercedem aeternitatis accipiet. Aquilas tamen posuit: in domino gloriabimur tota die, Symmachus ait: deo hymnum dicemus per omnem diem. concordat omnium sensus, ut non desinamus circa dei laudes siue hymnum dicendo siue diuinam per omnia momenta gloriam concinendo. qui enim hymnum dicit, puro corde et spiritaliter dicit et omne genus passionis excludit humanae, ut nullo maerore, nullius doloris acerbitate impediatur eius officium, exasperetur eius affectus, sed hymnum deo dicendo immobilis atque inreuocabilis perseueret sicut ipse Dauid, qui ait: benedicam dominum in omni tempore, semper laus eius in ore meo, sicut Iob, qui amissis filiis, interemptis omnibus p.uis, direptis facultatibus ait: dominus dedit, dominus abstulit; sit nomen domini benedictum.

See, however, the difference. While he is here, he glories in the Lord; there he will be praised in the Lord; for a short time he will receive the reward of eternity. Aquila, however, put: “In the Lord we shall glory all the day”; Symmachus says: “To God we shall sing a hymn every day.” The sense of all agrees: that we should not cease from the praises of God, whether by singing a hymn or by singing the divine glory at every moment. For he who sings a hymn sings with a pure heart and spiritually, and shuts out every kind of human passion, so that his service is hindered by no grief, by the bitterness of no pain, his disposition is not soured, but in singing a hymn to God he perseveres unmoved and unshaken, like David himself, who says: “I will bless the Lord at all times; his praise is always in my mouth”, like Job, who, when he had lost his sons, when all his [flocks] were slain and his possessions plundered, said: “The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”

Explanation 43, chapter 25

43.25.1CSEL 64:280

Nunc autem reppulisti et confudisti nos, et non progredieris, deus, in uirtutibus nostris. cum ipse sanctus Dauid alio loco dixerit: quia non repellet dominus plebem suam, quomodo hoc loco ait: reppulisti nos, praesertim cum hoc de plebe dicat, cui non mediocria insignia propriae uirtutis enumeret? neque enim mediocre est dicere, quod tempestates et uariae temptationes super se uenerint

“But now you have cast us off and put us to shame, and you will not go forth, O God, with our forces.” Since holy David himself said in another place: “For the Lord will not cast off his people”, how does he say in this place: “You have cast us off”, especially since he says this of a people for whom he lists no small marks of its own virtue? For it is no small thing to say that storms and various temptations have come upon it

43.25.2CSEL 64:280–281

et obliti non sint dominum deum suum et inique non egerint in testamentum eius et cetera quae secuntur. unde etiam apostolus sanctus interpretatur et dicit, quod eo usque non reppulerit plebem suam dominus, ut posuerit eum loquentem: tota die expandi manus meas ad plebem non credentem et contradicentem. cuius sermonis auctoritate subnixus ait: dico igitur: numquid reppulit deus hereditatem suam? absit; nam et ego Israelita sum ex semine Abraham, tribu Beniamin. non reppulit deus plebem suam quam praesciuit. sed potest hoc loco dici, quoniam ideo non reppulit plebem, quia reliquiae secundum electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt.

and they have not forgotten the Lord their God nor acted unjustly against his covenant, and the rest that follows. Hence the holy apostle too interprets it and says that the Lord did not cast off his people so far that he put him speaking thus: “All day long I have stretched out my hands to a people that does not believe and contradicts.” Relying on the authority of this saying he says: “I say, then, has God cast off his inheritance? By no means; for I too am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not cast off his people whom he foreknew.” But it can be said in this place that he did not cast off the people because a remnant according to the election of grace has been saved.

43.25.3CSEL 64:281

et uidetur in paucis non reppulisse quidem populum, tamen, etsi non totum populum, sed ex eo plurimos reppulisse. unde addidit ponendo responsum dei, quod non solum in paucis seruauerit plebem, sed etiam septem milia uirorum sibi reliquerit, qui non curuauerunt genua ante Baal. uerum fuerit hoc dictum ab apostolo secundum euangelium, quoniam dominus transierat ad gentes, responsi autem diuini tempus referatur ad zelum adhuc fidei feruentem, quando etiam prophetarum gratia redundabat populo Iudaeorum. unde si Heliae tempore negauit dominus a se plebem repulsam, multo magis tempore Dauid uel filiorum Core, quo adhuc fides electi populi praenitebat.

And it seems that, in a few, he did not cast off the people; yet, though not the whole people, he cast off very many of it. Hence he added, giving God’s answer, that he not only kept the people in a few but also left for himself seven thousand men who had not bowed the knee before Baal. That was said by the apostle according to the gospel, since the Lord had passed over to the gentiles; but let the time of the divine answer be referred to the zeal of faith still fervent, when the grace of the prophets also abounded for the people of the Jews. Hence, if in Elijah’s time the Lord denied that the people had been cast off by him, much more in the time of David or of the sons of Korah, when the faith of the chosen people still shone brightly.

Explanation 43, chapter 26

43.26.1CSEL 64:281–282

Tamen [ ut et ipsum sanctum Dauid interrogemus, (ut), quomodo dominus plebem suam non reppulerit, colligamus. nam cum sit deus appropinquans, non elonginquans: sicut habet scriptura ueteris testamenti, utique qui appropiat non repellit. est enim misericordiae diuinae, ut nulli causa sit mortis et omnes putet esse redimendos. sed uide ne ille repellatur, qui se elongat a domino, sicut dicit Dauid: quoniam ecce qui se elongant a te peribunt; perdidisti omnes qui fornicantur abs te. quid est abs te fornicantur? quia turpitudinis

Yet let us ask holy David himself, so that we may gather how the Lord did not cast off his people. For since he is a God who draws near, not one who withdraws, as the Scripture of the Old Testament has it, surely he who draws near does not cast off. For it belongs to the divine mercy to be the cause of death to no one and to think that all are to be redeemed. But see whether the one cast off is not he who withdraws from the Lord, as David says: “For see, those who withdraw from you will perish; you have destroyed all who go whoring from you.” What is “go whoring from you”? That with the mockeries

43.26.2CSEL 64:282

suae ludibriis te relinquunt et a te recedunt et a praeceptis tuis deuii sunt. denique alibi habes scriptum: adulteros autem iudicat deus disperdens eos a se, hoc est: alienando abs te perdidisti eos. ergo qui se a domino separat, ipse a domino separatur et qui non cognoscit dominum, a domino non cognoscitur et qui ignorat, ignoratur, sicut ipse dominus dixit: discedite a me omnes operarii iniquitatis. nescio uos, non enim scire dignatur iniustitiae ministros et iniquitatis auctores. peccator ergo non repellitur, quia ipse se repellit. hoc igitur genere dicit: nunc autem reppulisti et confudisti nos.

of their own baseness they leave you and depart from you and stray from your commandments. Finally you have it written elsewhere: “But adulterers God judges, destroying them from himself”, that is: by estranging them from you, you have destroyed them. So he who separates himself from the Lord is himself separated from the Lord, and he who does not know the Lord is not known by the Lord, and he who is ignorant is ignored, as the Lord himself said: “Depart from me, all you workers of iniquity; I do not know you”; for he does not deign to know the servants of injustice and the authors of iniquity. So the sinner is not cast off, because he casts himself off. In this sense, then, he says: “But now you have cast us off and put us to shame.”

Explanation 43, chapter 27

43.27.1CSEL 64:282

Quomodo tamen repellat deus, qui sequitur uersiculus exponit, quia non progredieris, inquit, deus, in uirtutibus nostris. deus quando non adiuuat, repellere uidetur; unusquisque enim, qui adiumenta non sentit diuinitatis sibi opitulatione conferri, repulsum se putat atque desertum. quid est autem quod ait: non progredieris, deus, et quid sibi uult, quod

How God casts off, however, the following verse explains, for “you will not go forth,” it says, “O God, with our forces.” When God does not help, he seems to cast off; for everyone who does not feel the help of the Godhead brought to him in aid thinks himself cast off and deserted. But what does he mean by “you will not go forth, O God”, and what does it mean that

43.27.2CSEL 64:282

deus interdum aut progredi dicitur aut egredi aut exurgere aut descendere? non enim corporaliter deus mouetur aut de aliquo loco exit aut ad alterum transit, qui supra omnia est, aut uere exurgit, quasi in aliquo iaceat cubili uel in aliqua sede corporaliter sedeat, sed haec dicuntur, ut tu intellegas, quando et ad quem egredi dicatur et ad quem exurgere; legimus enim in hoc ipso psalmo:

God is sometimes said to go forth, or to go out, or to rise up, or to come down? For God is not moved bodily, nor goes out of one place or passes to another, he who is above all; nor does he truly rise up, as though he lay on some bed or sat bodily on some seat. But these things are said so that you may understand when and to whom he is said to go out, and to whom to rise up; for we read in this very psalm:

43.27.3CSEL 64:282–283

exurge; quare obdormis, domine? et considerandum, ne quando nostris improbabilibus actibus obdormire uideatur. ut in euangelio legimus, cum adhuc inperfecti essent apostoli, quod his Iesus Christus dormiebat. uerum ubi metu naufragii et timore percussi sunt, Christum excitauerunt dormientem. perfidis ergo dormit dominus Iesus, fidelibus uigilat.

“Rise up; why do you sleep, O Lord?” And it must be considered lest he seem at times to sleep because of our unworthy actions. As we read in the gospel, when the apostles were still imperfect, Jesus Christ was asleep for them. But when they were struck with fear and terror of shipwreck, they woke Christ as he slept. So for the faithless the Lord Jesus sleeps; for the faithful he keeps watch.

Explanation 43, chapter 28

43.28.1CSEL 64:283

Denique et qui fidelis est intrat ad deum et a neglegente deus uidetur exire atque discedere. certe inperfectos et adhuc infirmos attrahit ad se dominus, sicut legisti dicentes iuuenculas: attrahe nos; post odorem unguentorum tuorum curramus. at uero Moyses, qui iam fortior erat et electus a domino, et ascendere legitur et intrare ad dominum deum suum, sicut scriptum est: quia ascendit Moyses in montem et circumdedit lux montem. et descendit maiestas domini in montem Sina et cooperuit eum nubes sex diebus; et uocauit dominus Moysen die septimo de media nube. aspectus autem maiestatis domini tamquam ignis ardens super uerticem montis coram filiis Israel. et intrauit Moyses in mediam nubem.

Finally, he who is faithful goes in to God, and from the negligent God seems to go out and depart. Certainly the Lord draws to himself the imperfect and still weak, as you have read the young maidens saying: “Draw us; let us run after the fragrance of your ointments.” But Moses, who was now stronger and chosen by the Lord, is read both to go up and to go in to the Lord his God, as it is written: “Moses went up into the mountain, and light surrounded the mountain. And the majesty of the Lord came down upon Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it six days; and the Lord called Moses on the seventh day from the midst of the cloud. And the appearance of the majesty of the Lord was like a burning fire on the top of the mountain before the sons of Israel. And Moses went into the midst of the cloud.”

43.28.2CSEL 64:283–284

sicut ergo hic Moyses intrabat in nubem, ubi primum ad montem uocatus a domino est, ita in posterioribus perfectior cum ipse intraret in tabernaculum suum, descendebat ad eum columna nubis et stabat in ostio tabernaculi. et stans totus populus adorauerunt unusquisque ad ostium tabernaculi. in nube autem dominus; posuit enim tenebras latibulum suum. ut scias autem, quia de domino dicit: et locutus est, inquit, dominus ad Moysen. quod autem extra castra tabernaculum Moysi positum esse commemoratur, ut occurreret deo, non uidetur esse contrarium; qui enim deum quaerit quasi ad deum intrat et tota mente ad cognitionem eius ingreditur

As, then, Moses here entered into the cloud when he was first called to the mountain by the Lord, so later, more perfect, when he went into his tabernacle, the pillar of cloud came down to him and stood at the door of the tabernacle; and all the people, standing, worshipped, each at the door of his tent. And the Lord was in the cloud; for he made darkness his hiding place. And so that you may know that it speaks of the Lord: “And the Lord spoke,” it says, “to Moses.” That Moses’ tabernacle is recorded as set outside the camp, so that he might meet God, does not seem contrary; for he who seeks God, as it were, goes in to God and enters with his whole mind into the knowledge of him.

Explanation 43, chapter 29

43.29.1CSEL 64:284

Iustus ergo intrat ad dominum, sicut Moyses intrabat in nubem; in nube autem deus. denique ecce uenit dominus in nube leui. et in euangelio habes scriptum: cum autem oras, intra in cubiculum tuum et clauso ostio ora patrem tuum in abscondito; et pater tuus qui uidet in abscondito reddet tibi.

The righteous man, then, goes in to the Lord, as Moses went into the cloud; and God is in the cloud. Finally: “See, the Lord comes on a light cloud.” And in the gospel you have it written: “But when you pray, go into your room and, shutting the door, pray to your Father in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will repay you.”

43.29.2CSEL 64:284

ergo intus quasi in cubiculo tuo deus est. audi etiam alibi quia intus est deus: ecce, inquit, dominus procedet de loco suo et descendet et ascendet super excelsa terrae et mouebuntur montes sub eo et ualles liquescent. scriptura hoc dicit et iam tunc significabat, quod desereret populum Iudaeorum et transiret ad gentes. denique et in psalmo hoc inuenimus expressum, cum dicit Dauid: et ipse tamquam sponsus procedens de thalamo suo, exultauit tamquam gigans ad currendam uiam.

So God is within, as in your room. Hear elsewhere too that God is within: “See,” it says, “the Lord will go forth from his place and come down and go up upon the heights of the earth, and the mountains will be moved under him and the valleys will melt.” Scripture says this, and already then it signified that he would leave the people of the Jews and pass over to the gentiles. Finally we find it expressed in the psalm too, when David says: “And he, like a bridegroom going forth from his chamber, exulted like a giant to run his way.”

Explanation 43, chapter 30

43.30.1CSEL 64:284

His igitur generibus repperimus egressum dei aut eius ingressum, sicut et dominus dicit Iesus, quia ad uirum timentem ueniat: ecce, inquit, sto ad ianuam et pulso; et si quis audierit uocem meam et aperuerit ianuam, intrabo ad eum et cenabo cum illo et ipse mecum. haec igitur diximus propterea, quod ait propheta: reppulisti nos et non progredieris, deus, in uirtutibus nostris.

In these ways, then, we have found God’s going out or his going in, as the Lord Jesus too says that he comes to the man who fears him: “See,” he says, “I stand at the door and knock; and if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him and he with me.” We have said these things because the prophet says: “You have cast us off, and you will not go forth, O God, with our forces.”

Explanation 43, chapter 31

43.31.1CSEL 64:284–285

Similiter autem et illud accipiamus, quia deus progressus est in uirtutibus Iudaeorum, quando Iesus Naue ducem militiae caelestis adorauit et ideo sine ferro uicit et sine ulla obsidione destruxit urbem Iericho, quae habebat ualidissimos muros. quando enim progressus est in uirtutibus seruorum suorum deus, uictoria consecuta est; nam progressus est angelus ad Ezechiae preces et strauit innumeras copias Assyriorum.

Likewise let us take this too: that God went forth with the forces of the Jews when Jesus son of Nave worshipped the leader of the heavenly army, and therefore conquered without iron and destroyed without any siege the city of Jericho, which had very strong walls. For when God went forth with the forces of his servants, victory followed; for an angel went forth at the prayers of Hezekiah and laid low countless troops of Assyrians.

43.31.2CSEL 64:285

sed interdum et quos uult in certamine coronari dominus ueluti derelinquit ad tempus, ut fide uincant nec rebus secundis et prosperis deuotio remittatur. denique saepe, qui prosperorum cursu et secundorum usurpatione ceciderunt, corriguntur aduersis. ideo frequenter inuenimus Iudaeos post uictoriam lapsos, post seruitium correctos, quia precibus et deplorationibus deum ad se redire fecerunt.

But sometimes the Lord, as it were, leaves for a time those whom he wishes to be crowned in the contest, so that they may conquer by faith and their devotion may not slacken in success and prosperity. Indeed, those who have fallen through a course of prosperity and the enjoyment of success are often corrected by adversity. Therefore we often find the Jews fallen after victory and corrected after servitude, because by prayers and laments they made God return to them.

Explanation 43, chapter 32

43.32.1CSEL 64:285

U"lld" et illud, quod secundum hominem dictum est et hominis affectum, huic sententiae non repugnat. quia dixit dominus: deus deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti? non quod derelictus sit dominus, qui ait alibi: quoniam solus non sum, quia pater mecum est, sed quia secundum carnem hominis et affectum, qui in certamine graui est constitutus, derelictus uidetur a domino. denique non otiose ait scriptura, quia post temptationem primam discessit ab eo diabolus usque ad tempus, hoc est usque ad certamen; ubi enim magnum certamen sacrae passionis aduenit, iterum aduersarius ad temptamenta successit.

And that too which was said according to man and the feeling of man is not opposed to this view: that the Lord said, “God, my God, look upon me; why have you forsaken me?” Not that the Lord was forsaken, who says elsewhere: “For I am not alone, because the Father is with me”, but because, according to the flesh and feeling of man, which is set in a grave contest, he seems forsaken by the Lord. Indeed, Scripture does not idly say that after the first temptation the devil departed from him until a time, that is, until the contest; for when the great contest of the sacred passion came, the adversary came on again to tempt.

43.32.2CSEL 64:285

homo autem, quando uelut in ambiguo constitutus est, putat se a suo deo esse desertum. sed quemadmodum hoc secundum carnis affectum accipimus, quia sibi homo uisus est derelictus, cuius processum operatus est Christus in corpore suo, ita etiam diuinitate sciebat se numquam derelinqui a patre, quia ipse dixit: ego in patre et pater in me et solum non esse signauit.

But man, when he is set as it were in uncertainty, thinks he has been deserted by his God. But just as we take this according to the feeling of the flesh, because the man seemed to himself forsaken, whose advance Christ worked in his own body, so too by his divinity he knew that he was never forsaken by the Father, because he himself said: “I am in the Father and the Father in me”, and indicated that he was not alone.

Explanation 43, chapter 33

43.33.1CSEL 64:285–286

Substituit etiam uersiculum istum: auertisti nos retrorsum prae inimicis nostris. non est bene qui retrorsum auertitur, quia nemo mittens manum in aratrum respiciens retro habilis est regno dei. denique uxor Loth, quia retro respexit, ad uerticem montis, hoc est ad superiora peruenire non potuit, sed in salem conuersa est, quae species cito soluitur nec potest usum habere diuturnum. sic sunt qui temporalia secuntur et non secuntur aeterna: et hic infatuantur a stultitia sua et futurorum gratiam habere non possunt.

He also adds this verse: “You have turned us back before our enemies.” It is not well with the one who is turned back, because “no one who puts his hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.” Finally Lot’s wife, because she looked back, could not reach the top of the mountain, that is, the higher things, but was turned into salt, a substance that quickly dissolves and cannot last long. So are those who follow temporal things and do not follow eternal ones: they are made foolish here by their own folly and cannot have the grace of the things to come.

43.33.2CSEL 64:286

sunt tamen qui retro positi obliuiscuntur superiorum et ad priora se extendunt, ut ad brauium ualeant peruenire. et Petro dicitur: uade retro me, satana, ut melius prouocetur, et in numeris prior est qui post Christum est. ideo ergo prae inimicis, quia illi nos affligunt et illi insectantur, retrorsum nos esse uoluisti, ut extendamus nos ad superiora, ut semper ante nos attendamus, persequentes inimicos nostros et eorum locum transire cupientes.

Yet there are those who, set behind, forget what is behind and stretch forward to what lies ahead, so as to be able to reach the prize. And to Peter it is said: “Get behind me, Satan”, so that he may be better spurred on; and in the reckoning he is first who is behind Christ. So, therefore, “before our enemies”, because they afflict us and they pursue us, you wished us to be behind, so that we may stretch forward to higher things and always look ahead of us, pursuing our enemies and desiring to pass their place.

Explanation 43, chapter 34

43.34.1CSEL 64:286

Denique Theodotion sic habet quomodo Septuaginta uiri, hoc est quomodo iste uersus expositus est. Aquilas habet: auertisti nos retro ab affligente, Symmachus: ordinasti nos nouissimos ab omni aduersario. contraria nobis quae sunt nisi uoluptaria istius saeculi et plena deliciarum atque lasciuiae et quae sunt incentiua luxuriae? uxor Loth decepta est, quia post se habebat luxuriam Sodomitanorum et eius regionis inlecebras. unde decepta est? quia post se respexit.

Finally Theodotion has it as the Seventy do, that is, as this verse has been explained. Aquila has: “You turned us back from the one who afflicts”; Symmachus: “You set us last before every adversary.” What things are contrary to us but the pleasures of this world, full of delights and wantonness, which are incitements to luxury? Lot’s wife was deceived because she had behind her the luxury of the Sodomites and the enticements of that region. How was she deceived? Because she looked back.

43.34.2CSEL 64:286–287

et tu ergo ne ad inimicos tuos respicias, posuit te deus nouissimum in saeculo; uel: qui humilitate se ultimum facit, non conuertitur retro, sed semper ante respicit. ut scias autem, qui sint inimici tui, audi dicentem: audi, Israel; quid est quod in terra es inimicorum? pollutus es in mortuis. quis tamen tam inimicus et hostis tuus quam princeps istius mundi et eius socii, qui persecuti sunt usque ad crucem dominum Iesum, eius potentiam nescientes? si enim cognouissent, numquam dominum maiestatis crucifixissent.

So do not you look back to your enemies; God has set you last in the world. Or: he who makes himself last by humility does not turn back but always looks ahead. And so that you may know who your enemies are, hear him saying: “Hear, Israel; why is it that you are in the land of your enemies? You are defiled among the dead.” Yet who is so much your enemy and foe as the prince of this world and his associates, who persecuted the Lord Jesus even to the cross, not knowing his power? For if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of majesty.

43.34.3CSEL 64:287

ergo tu, etsi nouissimus es, noli inimicos tuos sequi, sed sequere dominum Iesum et crucem eius leua et insiste uestigiis eius. qui enim Christum sequitur, post se non respicit, id est ad luxurias atque inlecebras peccatorum, et ideo potest dicere cum sanctis: non recessit retro cor nostrum. unde intellegitur, quod et is, qui ante inimicos suos est, corde fit nouissimus atque postremus, si ad illos respiciat et carnalibus potius quam spiritalibus affectu mentis intendat.

So you, even if you are last, do not follow your enemies, but follow the Lord Jesus, and lift up his cross and keep to his footsteps. For he who follows Christ does not look behind him, that is, to the luxuries and enticements of sins; and therefore he can say with the saints: “Our heart has not turned back.” From this it is understood that even he who is before his enemies becomes last and lowest in heart, if he looks back to them and attends with the affection of his mind to carnal rather than spiritual things.

43.34.4CSEL 64:287

potest etiam, qui nouissimus est, corde prior esse, si ea quae in caelo sunt consideret et non quae in terris. audi, quia nouissimus in saeculo inter primos sit apud Christum: puto quia deus nos apostolos nouissimos ostendit sicut morti destinatos, ut spectaculum simus huic mundo et angelis et hominibus. nouissimum se dixit et idem tamen quod primus esset ostendit, cum dicit: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est.

He who is last can also be first in heart, if he considers the things that are in heaven and not those on earth. Hear that one who is last in the world is among the first with Christ: “I think that God has shown us apostles last, as men appointed to death, so that we are a spectacle to this world, both to angels and to men.” He called himself last, and yet he showed that he was first, when he says: “But our citizenship is in heaven.”

Explanation 43, chapter 35

43.35.1CSEL 64:287

Sequitur: et qui oderant nos diripiebant sibi; dedisti nos tamquam oues escarum et in nationes dispersisti nos. miraris forsitan, quod, cum in posterioribus, ut diximus, summam habeant fidei constantiam qui locuntur, hic dicant, quod ab his qui oderant eos diripiebantur; sed non te ista perterreant; multi enim hic diripiuntur et tamen mentes eorum a Christo non queunt separari.

There follows: “And those who hated us plundered for themselves; you have given us like sheep for food and scattered us among the nations.” You are perhaps surprised that, while those who speak have, as we have said, the highest constancy of faith in what follows, here they say that they were plundered by those who hated them; but let these things not frighten you. For many are plundered here, and yet their minds cannot be separated from Christ.

43.35.2CSEL 64:287–288

rapiebantur apostoli, caedebantur uirgis, in carcerem trudebantur, separabantur a se, et tamen cum Christo manebant, immo hoc ipso, quod rapiebantur a perfidis, eorum merita crescebant et gratia in caelestibus augebatur; non enim statim, qui ab hominibus diripitur, etiam uincitur. uide apostolum Paulum gratulatum in periculis suis, uide gloriantem, quod per fenestram in sporta demissus sit. uide quemadmodum sanctus Hieremias, sanctus Ezechiel, sanctus Danihel in captiuitatem deducti et ab Assyriis direpti nullam tamen captiuitatem propriae fidei pertulerunt nec in testamentum domini deliquere, qui seruarunt in captiuitate etiam legis praecepta diuinae nec de interdictis cibis putauerunt contra institutionem maiorum aliquid usurpandum.

The apostles were seized, beaten with rods, thrust into prison, separated from one another, and yet they remained with Christ; indeed, by the very fact that they were seized by the faithless, their merits grew and their grace in heaven was increased; for not everyone who is plundered by men is at once also conquered. See the apostle Paul rejoicing in his dangers, see him glorying that he was let down through a window in a basket. See how holy Jeremiah, holy Ezekiel, holy Daniel were led into captivity and plundered by the Assyrians, yet suffered no captivity of their own faith, nor sinned against the covenant of the Lord, for they kept even in captivity the precepts of the divine law and did not think that anything should be taken from forbidden foods against the teaching of their elders.

Explanation 43, chapter 36

43.36.1CSEL 64:288

Unde bene Theodotion dixit: et qui oderant nos exultabant super nos; insultatio enim inimicorum non affert praeiudicium bonis mentibus, sed nec direptio inimicorum. ideoque sanctus dicit, qui certus est quod direptio sibi obesse non possit: quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? tribulatio an angustia? et cetera. sed in his omnibus superamus et superuincimus per eum qui dilexit nos, scientes quod neque mors neque uita neque angelus neque potestates neque praesentia neque futura separare nos

Hence Theodotion rightly said: “And those who hated us exulted over us”; for the insults of enemies bring no prejudice to good minds, nor does the plundering of enemies. And therefore the saint, who is sure that plundering cannot harm him, says: “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation or distress?” and the rest. “But in all these we overcome and more than conquer through him who loved us, knowing that neither death nor life nor angel nor powers nor things present nor things to come can separate us

43.36.2CSEL 64:288

possint a caritate dei quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. ergo, qui talis est, non separatur a Christo. unde, etiamsi corporaliter diripiatur, spiritaliter tamen liber est et non solum direptioni obnoxius non est, sed etiam rapinam sibi laudabilem quaerit, sicut illi, de quibus scriptum est: a diebus Iohannis Baptistae regnum caelorum cogitur et cogentes diripiunt illud. uictor est itaque, qui in terrenis positus captiuus perfidiae esse non nouit; nec solum ei non diripitur quod praeclarum est, sed magis ipse diripit quod aeternum est.

from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” So he who is such is not separated from Christ. Hence, even if he is plundered in body, yet in spirit he is free, and not only is he not liable to plundering, but he even seeks for himself a praiseworthy plunder, like those of whom it is written: “From the days of John the Baptist the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent plunder it.” So he is a victor who, set among earthly things, does not know how to be a captive of faithlessness; and not only is what is glorious not plundered from him, but rather he himself plunders what is eternal.

Explanation 43, chapter 37

43.37.1CSEL 64:288–289

Sunt etiam qui fiant oues escarum. bonus dominus noster Iesus Christus, quia factus est ouis epulationis nostrae. quaeris, quomodo factus sit? audi dicentem: pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus et considera, quemadmodum parentes nostri in figura diripientes agnum manducabant, significantes domini Iesu passionem, cuius cotidie uescimur sacramento.

There are also those who become sheep for food. Good is our Lord Jesus Christ, because he became the sheep of our feast. You ask how he became so? Hear the one who says: “Christ our Passover has been sacrificed”, and consider how our fathers in a figure tore the lamb and ate it, signifying the passion of the Lord Jesus, whose sacrament we eat daily.

43.37.2CSEL 64:289

per ipsam igitur ouem facti sunt greges escarum, sicut Aquilas dixit, uel greges in escas, sicut Theodotion locutus est, uel pascua edentium, sicut Symmachus dixit. sed bona epulatio non solum non est metuenda sanctis, sed etiam concupiscenda. aliter enim ad regnum caelorum non potest perueniri, cum ipse dominus dixerit: nisi manducaueritis carnem meam, non habebitis uitam aeternam. probatum est igitur, quod dominus noster sit epulatio uel alimentum edentium, sicut ipse ait: ego sum panis uiuus qui de caelo descendi.

Through that very sheep, then, they became flocks for food, as Aquila said, or flocks for eating, as Theodotion put it, or pasture of eaters, as Symmachus said. But a good feast is not only not to be feared by the saints but even to be desired. For otherwise the kingdom of heaven cannot be reached, since the Lord himself has said: “Unless you eat my flesh, you will not have eternal life.” It is proved, then, that our Lord is the feast or the food of those who eat, as he himself says: “I am the living bread who came down from heaven.”

Explanation 43, chapter 38

43.38.1CSEL 64:289

Et ut scias, quia haec omnia propter nos facta sunt, ex quo ille descendit, ex illo sanctus ait: nos omnes unus panis sumus. non ergo timeamus, quia facti sumus oues escarum. sicut enim domini caro et sanguis ipsius nos redemit, ita etiam Petrus pro ecclesia multa tolerauit; multa etiam sanctus apostolus Paulus et ceteri apostoli pertulerunt, cum caederentur uirgis, cum lapidarentur, cum in carcerem truderentur.

And so that you may know that all these things were done for our sake, from the time he came down, from then the saint says: “We all are one bread.” Let us not fear, then, that we have become sheep for food. For as the flesh of the Lord and his blood redeemed us, so Peter too endured much for the church; much also did the holy apostle Paul and the other apostles suffer, when they were beaten with rods, when they were stoned, when they were thrust into prison.

43.38.2CSEL 64:289

illa enim tolerantia iniuriarum et usu periculorum domini fundatus est populus et ecclesia incrementum est consecuta, cum ceteri ad martyrium festinarent, uidentes per illas passiones nihil apostolorum decessisse uirtutibus, sed etiam propter hanc breuem uitam inmortalitatem illis esse quaesitam.

For by that endurance of injuries and the experience of dangers the Lord’s people was founded and the church obtained its increase, while the others hastened to martyrdom, seeing that through those sufferings nothing had been taken from the virtues of the apostles, but that for this short life immortality had been gained for them.

Explanation 43, chapter 39

43.39.1CSEL 64:289–290

Quod ostendit etiam qui sequitur uersiculus, quia dixerunt: inter gentes dispersisti nos. similiter Theodotion dixit; Aquilas autem et Symmachus: in gentibus aut inter gentes uentilasti nos. missi sunt enim apostoli sancti ad gentes et dispersi sunt inter gentes sicut et prophetae sancti, de

This the following verse also shows, for they said: “You have scattered us among the nations.” Theodotion said the same; but Aquila and Symmachus: “In the nations” or “among the nations you have winnowed us.” For the holy apostles were sent to the nations and were scattered among the nations, as were the holy prophets, of

43.39.2CSEL 64:290

quibus supra diximus, ut in illa dispersione fructus plurimi nascerentur. ut enim dominus noster Iesus Christus sicut granum cecidit in terram et mortuus est, ut multum fructum afferret, ita etiam dispersi sunt apostoli sancti, ut bonum inter gentes semen afferrent, quo ad eorum similitudinem fructus gentium pullularet. denique scriptura hoc dicit dixisse dominum: quia propterea uos misi, ut uos eatis et fructum plurimum afferatis et fructus uester maneat.

whom we spoke above, so that in that scattering very much fruit might be born. For as our Lord Jesus Christ fell into the ground like a grain and died, so as to bear much fruit, so too the holy apostles were scattered, so as to bring good seed among the nations, by which the fruit of the nations might spring up in their likeness. Finally, Scripture says that the Lord said this: “For this reason I have sent you, that you may go and bear much fruit, and that your fruit may remain.”

43.39.3CSEL 64:290

factus est ergo dominus sicut semen, secundum quod dictum est ad Abraham: et semini tuo, quod est Christus. semen ergo omnium Christus et ideo cadere se passus est et spargi, ut conforme corpori suo transfiguraret corpus humilitatis nostrae. hoc ergo semen salutare omnibus hominibus pullulauit et ex illo ad eius imaginem figurati quasi semina apostoli sancti missi sunt per diuersa atque

So the Lord became like seed, according to what was said to Abraham: “And to your seed, which is Christ.” Christ, then, is the seed of all, and therefore he allowed himself to fall and be scattered, so as to transform the body of our lowliness to be conformed to his body. This saving seed, then, sprang up for all men, and from it, shaped to his image, the holy apostles were sent like seeds to different places and

43.39.4CSEL 64:290

dispersi, ut in agrum ecclesiae gentes congregatae diuersis fructibus refulgerent toto orbe terrarum. isti ergo dispersiones dicuntur, sicut etiam in posterioribus idem Dauid dicit: aedificans Hierusalem dominus et dispersiones Israel congregans. dispersi sunt enim, ut nouos fructus facerent et postea ueluti triticum nouum ecclesiae horreis inueheretur.

scattered, so that the nations gathered into the field of the church might shine with various fruits throughout the whole world. These, then, are called the dispersions, as the same David says further on: “The Lord builds Jerusalem and gathers the dispersions of Israel.” For they were scattered so as to bear new fruit and afterwards be brought, like new wheat, into the barns of the church.

Explanation 43, chapter 40

43.40.1CSEL 64:290

Haec autem dispersio non in inferioribus fit, hoc est non in terra, sed in caelo. denique legis hoc praecepta confirmant, per quam dicit dominus: si fuerit dispersio tua a summo caelo usque ad summum caeli, inde congregabo te, dicit dominus. quae est dispersio a summo caelo usque ad summum caelum? quis iste tantus, qui sic potuerit disseminari?

But this scattering does not take place in the lower regions, that is, not on earth, but in heaven. Finally, the precepts of the law confirm this, through which the Lord says: “If your dispersion is from the highest heaven to the highest heaven, from there I will gather you, says the Lord.” What is the dispersion from the highest heaven to the highest heaven? Who is so great that he could be sown in this way?

43.40.2CSEL 64:290–291

si homo in terra natus est, ab imo, non a summo coepit. si ista te mouent atque perturbant, redi ad superiora istius sancti prophetae et audi, quis ille sit tantus, qui huiusmodi in terris segetes fecundauit, ut fructus earum ad caelestia receptacula perueniret. est autem ille sponsus, qui quasi gigans percucurrit hanc uiam totam inuiam aliis, sibi peruiam; et ex illo coepit peruia iam esse mortalibus, ita tamen, ut isti ascenderent, solus tamen ille ipse ante descenderet, ut postea sancti eius mererentur ascendere.

If a man is born on earth, he began from below, not from the top. If these things trouble and disturb you, go back to the earlier words of this holy prophet and hear who is so great that he made such harvests fruitful on earth that their fruit reached the heavenly storehouses. He is the bridegroom who like a giant ran this whole way, impassable to others, passable to himself; and from him it began to be passable now to mortals, yet so that, for these to ascend, he alone first came down, so that afterwards his saints might be found worthy to ascend.

43.40.3CSEL 64:291

audi ergo, quomodo disseminatio fuerit de caeli summo ad caeli summum: a summo, inquit, caelo egressio eius et occursus eius usque ad summum eius. cui homini hoc possit attribui? Moyses uix in uerticem Sina montis ascendit et hoc quia uocatus a domino est et hortatus est uoce caelesti.

Hear, then, how the sowing was from the highest heaven to the highest heaven: “From the highest heaven,” he says, “is his going out, and his meeting to its highest point.” To what man could this be attributed? Moses scarcely went up to the top of Mount Sinai, and that because he was called by the Lord and urged by a heavenly voice.

43.40.4CSEL 64:291

a summo caelo quis descenderet nisi Christus, qui et cum descendit in terras manebat in caelo? nemo enim ascendit in caelum nisi qui descendit de caelo, filius hominis qui est in caelis. uides ergo, quia et cum descenderet et ascenderet ipse erat et manebat in caelo. ipse enim dixit: caelum et terram ego compleo, dicit dominus; ipse est qui est in caelo. haec de dispersione satis dicta sint.

Who would come down from the highest heaven but Christ, who even when he came down to earth remained in heaven? For “no one has ascended into heaven but he who came down from heaven, the Son of Man who is in heaven.” You see, then, that both when he came down and when he went up he was the same and remained in heaven. For he himself said: “I fill heaven and earth, says the Lord”; he it is who is in heaven. Let this suffice about the dispersion.

Explanation 43, chapter 41

43.41.1CSEL 64:291

Ceterum quod ait: uentilasti nos, etsi uerbo distat, sensu congruit. sicut enim illi qui dispersi sunt probati, ita etiam qui uentilati sunt ad probationem peruenire meruerunt. sicut enim triticum uentilatur et a paleis separatur et mundum est, si autem uentilatum non fuerit mundum esse non poterit, sed extat paleis concretum atque permixtum, ita etiam homo, nisi temptationibus fuerit uentilatus, fragilia quaeque uel paleas a se non potest separare.

As for his saying, “You have winnowed us”, though it differs in word it agrees in sense. For as those who were scattered were proved, so those who were winnowed were found worthy to reach approval. For as wheat is winnowed and separated from the chaff and is clean, but if it has not been winnowed it cannot be clean, but remains stuck together and mixed with chaff, so too a man, unless he has been winnowed by temptations, cannot separate from himself whatever is frail, or his chaff.

43.41.2CSEL 64:291–292

unde etiam ad Petrum dictum est: Simon, ecce satanas expostulauit ut uentilet uos sicut triticum; ego autem rogaui patrem meum, ut non deficiat fides tua. uide quid dicit et intellege: uentilatur Petrus; ut Christum negare cogatur. incidit temptationes, quaedam locutus est quasi plena palearum, sed locutus est uerbo, ut fundatior esset affectu.

Hence it was also said to Peter: “Simon, see, Satan has demanded to winnow you like wheat; but I have asked my Father that your faith may not fail.” See what he says and understand: Peter is winnowed, so that he is driven to deny Christ. He fell into temptations; he spoke certain words as though full of chaff; but he spoke in word, so as to be more firmly grounded in affection.

43.41.3CSEL 64:292

denique fleuit et paleas suas lauit et illis temptationibus meruit, ut pro se Christus interueniret. quanto maius est patrocinium quam perturbationis illius temptamentum! et ideo plus quam passus est adquisiuit; adquisiuit enim Christum sibi patrocinantem. cogitur autem aduersarius sanctos domini ad sua damna temptare; dum enim temptat, meliores reddit, ut qui temptatur possit et alios instituere, qui sibi ipse inualidus uidebatur.

Finally he wept and washed his chaff, and by those temptations he was found worthy to have Christ intercede for him. How much greater is the patronage than the trial of that disturbance! And therefore he gained more than he suffered; for he gained Christ as his patron. And the adversary is compelled to tempt the saints of the Lord to his own loss; for while he tempts, he makes them better, so that the one who is tempted, who seemed weak to himself, can also train others.

43.41.4CSEL 64:292

denique Petrus ecclesiae praeponitur, postquam temptatus a diabolo est. ideoque ante significat dominus, quid sit illud, quod postea eum pastorem elegit dominici gregis. nam hic dixit: tu autem conuersus confirma fratres tuos. conuersus est ergo sanctus apostolus Petrus ad bonam frugem et uentilatus est sicut triticum, ut esset ipse cum sanctis domini unus panis, qui nobis esset alimentum. dum enim Petri actus legimus, Petri praecepta cognoscimus, fit nobis uitae aeternae et salutis alimentum.

Finally, Peter is set over the church after he was tempted by the devil. And therefore the Lord signifies beforehand what that is, that afterwards he chose him as shepherd of the Lord’s flock. For here he said: “But you, when you have turned, strengthen your brothers.” So the holy apostle Peter turned to good fruit and was winnowed like wheat, so that he himself might be with the saints of the Lord one bread, which would be food for us. For while we read the acts of Peter, we learn the precepts of Peter, and it becomes for us food of eternal life and salvation.

Explanation 43, chapter 42

43.42.1CSEL 64:292

Uendidisti, inquit, populum tuum sine pretio. emendi et uendendi uidetur aequalis quidam esse contractus; sed tamen, si ementis et uendentis affectum consideres, unusquisque sibi uiliorem uendit et complacitum emit. ut enim praeter id genus hominum loquamur, qui negotiationem uendendis mancipiis exercent, non facile quisquam uendit nisi eum, qui sibi displiceat et quem usui suo inhabilem putet, et iterum unusquisque emere desiderat eum, quem utilitati uel ministerio accommodum iudicauerit. sed et ipsi, qui in uendendis mancipiis sumptum exercent suum et sectantur lucra, utique ita uiles habent eos quos uendunt, ut eis uiliores sint quam pecunia, et saepe etiam ipsi, quos negotiationi suae magis habiles aestimauerint, malunt tenere quam uendere.

“You have sold your people,” he says, “without price.” There seems to be a kind of equal contract of buying and selling; but if you consider the disposition of the buyer and the seller, each sells what is of less value to him and buys what pleases him. For, to speak apart from that class of men who carry on a trade in selling slaves, no one easily sells anyone except one who displeases him and whom he thinks unfit for his use; and again each desires to buy one whom he has judged suitable for his advantage or service. But even those who spend their outlay on selling slaves and pursue gain certainly hold those they sell so cheap that they are worth less to them than money; and often they prefer to keep rather than sell those whom they have thought more suited to their business.

Explanation 43, chapter 43

43.43.1CSEL 64:292–293

Ita ergo et deus uiliorem uendidit, potiorem emit. uendidit populum Iudaeorum non inclementia dei, sed sua culpa, quibus recte dicitur: ecce peccatis uestris uenditi estis et propter iniquitates uestras dimisi matrem uestram. hoc itaque genere uenditus populus Iudaeorum, emptus est populus Christianus, ille peccato uenditus, hic emptus sanguine. unde Petrus ait:

So too, then, God sold what was of less worth and bought what was better. He sold the people of the Jews, not through God’s harshness but through their own fault, to whom it is rightly said: “See, you have been sold for your sins, and for your iniquities I have put away your mother.” In this way, then, the people of the Jews was sold and the Christian people bought, the one sold by sin, the other bought with blood. Hence Peter says:

43.43.2CSEL 64:293

non corruptibilibus, argento uel auro, empti estis, sed pretioso sanguine. qui est sanguis pretiosus nisi agni illius inmaculati, hoc est domini nostri Iesu Christi? ergo sine pretio populus Iudaeorum, pretiosus autem populus Christianus; ille pretium non habet, quia peccatum habet, iste in pretio est, cui peccatum remissum est.

“You were bought not with corruptible things, silver or gold, but with precious blood.” What is the precious blood but that of the spotless Lamb, that is, of our Lord Jesus Christ? So the people of the Jews is without price, but the Christian people is precious; the one has no price because it has sin, the other has value because its sin has been forgiven.

43.43.3CSEL 64:293

unde recte ecclesiae filiis dicitur: pretio empti estis; nolite fieri serui hominum. si tibi dicitur, ne seruus fias hominum et perdas propriam libertatem, multo magis dicitur tibi, ne seruus fias peccati, et iterum, ne seruus fias serpentis inimici et aduersarii, sed seruias soli domino, qui propria te redemit caritate, quia ipse est suorum redemptio seruulorum.

Hence it is rightly said to the sons of the church: “You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.” If you are told not to become a slave of men and lose your own freedom, much more are you told not to become a slave of sin, and again not to become a slave of the serpent, the enemy and adversary, but to serve the Lord alone, who has redeemed you by his own love, because he is the redemption of his servants.

Explanation 43, chapter 44

43.44.1CSEL 64:293

Non uendit ergo dominus nisi seruum malum, non uendit utique bonum. nam etsi Ioseph uenditus est, non dixit tamen propheta: a domino uenditus est Ioseph, sed: in seruum uenditus est Ioseph, quem fratres proprii uendiderunt, quem dominus tamen in figura propriae passionis redemit a seruitute, renouauit ad gratiam.

So the Lord sells only a bad servant; he certainly does not sell a good one. For although Joseph was sold, the prophet did not say: “Joseph was sold by the Lord”, but: “Joseph was sold as a slave”, whom his own brothers sold, whom yet the Lord, as a figure of his own passion, redeemed from slavery and renewed to grace.

43.44.2CSEL 64:293

uendiderunt itaque eum fratres et acceperunt pecuniam, sed dominus eum non solum libertati reddidit, sed etiam dignitate cumulauit. figuram autem in eo fuisse domini Iesu ostendit scriptura, quae dicit: filius meus zelo appetitus, ad me reuertere, et alibi: primogenitus tauri decus eius, eo quod exaltauerit deus pater cornu christi sui.

So his brothers sold him and took money, but the Lord not only restored him to freedom but also loaded him with dignity. That he was a figure of the Lord Jesus Scripture shows, which says: “My son, sought out in envy, return to me”, and elsewhere: “The firstborn, the beauty of a bull is his”, because God the Father exalted the horn of his Christ.

Explanation 43, chapter 45

43.45.1CSEL 64:293–294

Qui ergo uenditur, uilis et sine pretio est, quasi qui magis non sit quam qui sit. unde et Aquilas dixit: tradidisti populum tuum, ut non esset, et Symmachus: tradidisti populum tuum sine substantia. non sunt enim qui repudiantur a Christo; sunt autem qui eliguntur a domino, quoniam dominus uocauit quae non sunt tamquam quae sint et electae sunt gentium nationes, ut destrueretur perfidia Iudaeorum. in nihilum ergo traditus est ille populus, quia peccato suo uenditus est; nullam enim habet culpa substantiam.

He who is sold, then, is cheap and without price, as one who rather is not than is. Hence Aquila too said: “You handed over your people, so that it should not be”, and Symmachus: “You handed over your people without substance.” For those who are rejected by Christ are not; but those who are chosen by the Lord are, since the Lord called the things that are not as though they were, and the peoples of the nations were chosen, so that the faithlessness of the Jews might be destroyed. That people was handed over into nothing, then, because it was sold by its own sin; for guilt has no substance.

Explanation 43, chapter 46

43.46.1CSEL 64:294

Unde dictum puto: et non fuit multitudo in commutationibus eorum, hoc est: gratis nos dispersisti per nationes. neque enim tu quicquam per commutationem accipis, ut animam tradas hominis; nihil enim tibi gratius est animae conuersione. sed si conuerti detractat, ipsa se tradit in nihilum, ut peccato et flagitio mancipetur. ideo tu sine pretio et sine commutatione degenerem populum uendidisti. unde in posterioribus ait: non enim est illis commutatio. quare non est illis commutatio? quia non timuerunt, inquit, deum.

Hence I think it was said: “And there was no abundance in their exchanges”, that is: you scattered us freely among the nations. For you receive nothing by exchange in handing over the soul of a man; for nothing is more pleasing to you than the conversion of a soul. But if it refuses to be converted, it hands itself over into nothing, so as to be made the property of sin and wickedness. Therefore you sold the degenerate people without price and without exchange. Hence he says further on: “For there is no exchange for them.” Why is there no exchange for them? “Because,” it says, “they did not fear God.”

Explanation 43, chapter 47

43.47.1CSEL 64:294

Duplex autem intellectus, quare commutationem non habuerit populus erroris, quia non potest homo argento uel auro uel possessionibus redimere animam suam. quam enim dabit commutationem animae suae, cum illa temporalia uel caduca sint, anima autem permaneat uel ad praemium uel ad poenam? non fuit autem etiam illa commutatio in impiis quae est in resurrectione, de qua dicit apostolus:

But there is a twofold understanding of why the people of error had no exchange: because a man cannot redeem his soul with silver or gold or possessions. For what exchange will he give for his soul, since those things are temporal and perishable, while the soul remains, either for reward or for punishment? Nor was there in the ungodly that exchange which is in the resurrection, of which the apostle says:

43.47.2CSEL 64:294–295

omnes resurgemus, non omnes immutabimur. potest quoque et sic intellegi, quia, etsi pauci redempti immutari meruerunt ut Abraham Isaac Iacob Moyses, non tamen ad omnes commutatio ipsa peruenit. est etiam illud, ut non sit multitudo in commutationibus grauium peccatorum, secundum quod scriptum est, quia quorundam hominum peccata manifesta sunt praecedentia in iudicium, quosdam autem et subsecuntur. quae grauia sunt atque manifesta praecedunt et sine ulla dubitatione merguntur, quae autem leuiora sunt bonis operibus saepe releuantur; beati enim quorum remissae sunt iniquitates et quorum tecta sunt peccata. ubi autem iniquitas propendit, nulla bonorum operum commutatione reuocatur.

“We shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed.” It can also be understood thus: that although a few redeemed were found worthy to be changed, like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, yet the change itself did not reach all. There is also this: that there may be no abundance in the exchanges of grave sins, according to what is written, that the sins of some men are evident, going before them to judgment, but those of others follow after. Those that are grave and evident go before and are sunk without any doubt; but those that are lighter are often relieved by good works; for “blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered.” But where iniquity outweighs, it is not recalled by any exchange of good works.

Explanation 43, chapter 48

43.48.1CSEL 64:295

Ergo et si quis est redemptus de populo Iudaeorum, non ideo redemptus, quia multam habuit aestimationem sui nec quia multitudinem habuit in commutatione sua, sed redemptus est gratis, quod te docet apostolus dicens: reliquiae secundum electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. ubi autem gratia, non utique merito operum nec iustificatione uirtutum, sed liberalitate donantis, electione redimentis.

So even if anyone of the people of the Jews is redeemed, he is not redeemed because he had a great estimation of himself, nor because he had abundance in his exchange, but he is redeemed freely, as the apostle teaches you, saying: “A remnant according to the election of grace has been saved.” Where there is grace, it is certainly not by merit of works nor by justification of virtues, but by the generosity of the giver, by the choice of the redeemer.

43.48.2CSEL 64:295

quod aeque scriptura te docuit dicente apostolo Paulo: si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia. quid ergo? quod quaerebat Israel, hoc non est consecutus. quare non sit consecutus agnosce: quia se iustificare cupiebat, quia operum suorum iactantiam requirebat, quia fidem non detulit nec gratiam recognouit. et ideo electio consecuta quae uocantem audiuit, aduenientem suscepit.

This Scripture has likewise taught you, the apostle Paul saying: “But if by grace, it is no longer from works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.” What then? What Israel sought, it did not obtain. Learn why it did not obtain it: because it wished to justify itself, because it sought the boasting of its own works, because it did not offer faith nor recognize grace. And therefore the election obtained it, which heard the one who called and received the one who came.

Explanation 43, chapter 49

43.49.1CSEL 64:295–296

Merito ergo in persona populi illius dicitur: posuisti nos in obprobrium uicinis nostris, inlusionem et derisum his qui sunt in circuitu nostro. qui sunt isti finitimi et quemadmodum ad uiciniam Israelitae populi pertinuisse uideantur, non est facile discernere. si spiritalis uicinia requiratur, abest quoddam lumen cognitionis ad inuestigandum mysterium Christi, praesertim cum in ipso libro Salomonis qui inscribitur Ecclesiastes didicerimus, quia, quo magis quaeritur sapientia, eo profundior iudicetur. sic enim scriptum est: dixit: sapientiam requiram, et ipsa longe facta est a

Rightly, then, it is said in the person of that people: “You have made us a reproach to our neighbours, a mockery and derision to those around us.” Who these neighbours are, and how they seem to have belonged to the neighbourhood of the Israelite people, is not easy to discern. If a spiritual neighbourhood is sought, some light of knowledge is lacking for investigating the mystery of Christ, especially since in that very book of Solomon which is entitled Ecclesiastes we have learned that the more wisdom is sought, the deeper it is judged. For so it is written: “He said: I will seek wisdom, and it went far from

43.49.2CSEL 64:296

me, longe magis quam erat, et in profundo altitudinem quis inueniet eius? unde diffidentia oboritur mihi scrutari diuinitus spirantis scripturae mysteria et eius examinare sermones, quod ille digne potuit qui inter perfectos sapientiam loquebatur. ego perfectos uideo nec inmerito perfectos dixerim, cum uideam uos sensus exercitatos habere ad discretionem boni et mali; sed et ipse tamen, qui sciebat solidiores capere cibos, adiumenta quaerebat, ut in eo uerbum domini curreret. nec iste quoque sine precatione hoc potuit usurpare, ut laudatio eius iocunda fieret deo; non enim usurpantis, sed precantis assertio est.

me, much farther than it was, and in the depth, who will find its height?” Hence distrust comes over me in searching the mysteries of the divinely inspired Scripture and examining its words, which he could worthily do who spoke wisdom among the perfect. I see that you are perfect, and not undeservedly would I call you perfect, since I see that you have your senses trained for the discernment of good and evil; but even he who knew how to take more solid food sought help, that the word of the Lord might run in him. Nor could this one either claim this without prayer, that his praise might be pleasing to God; for it is the assertion not of one who claims but of one who prays.

Explanation 43, chapter 50

43.50.1CSEL 64:296

Tamen ne penitus refugisse uideamur, consideremus qui uicini tribubus fuerint Iudaeorum. nam ut uetera recenseamus, Philistienses tribus Iudae finitimi habebantur; ex alio latere idem tribui Ruben appropinquabant. Ammanitae quoque in deserto erant et, qui erant in finibus Tyri et Sidonis, Galilaeae copulabantur, hoc est tribui Zabulon et tribui Neptalim quae erant in Galilaea, sicut Esaias dixit:

Yet, lest we seem to have shrunk back altogether, let us consider who were neighbours of the tribes of the Jews. For, to review the old things, the Philistines were held to border the tribe of Judah; on another side they also came near the tribe of Reuben. The Ammonites too were in the desert, and those in the borders of Tyre and Sidon were joined to Galilee, that is, to the tribe of Zebulun and the tribe of Naphtali, which were in Galilee, as Isaiah said:

43.50.2CSEL 64:296

terra Zabulon et terra Neptalim, uiam maris trans Iordane. unde potest quis colligere, quae proprietas uniuscuiusque singularum fuerit tribuum, ut certis quibusque finitimis iungerentur, quo paulatim etiam gentibus infunderetur cognitio caelestium sacramentorum. quod utique potest intellegi de illa muliere Chananaea, quae exiuit de finibus suis, ut domino Iesu occurreret transeunti et posthabitis simulacris suis adoraret uerum salutis auctorem; cui testi-

“Land of Zebulun and land of Naphtali, the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan.” From this one can gather what was the particular character of each of the tribes, so that they were joined to certain neighbours, through whom the knowledge of the heavenly sacraments might gradually be poured into the nations too. This can certainly be understood of that Canaanite woman who went out from her borders to meet the Lord Jesus as he passed, and, putting aside her idols, to worship the true author of salvation; to whom

43.50.3CSEL 64:296–297

monium dedit dominus noster Iesus Christus, quod magna esset fides eius. resplendebat quidem iam gratia euangelii et praesentiae lumen augustae; sed tamen, quia sponte exiuit et misericordiam postulauit et dominum pia uoce confessa est et quasi fastidio habita in clamore petitionis propriae perseuerauit, non mediocrem praerogatiuam accepit istiusmodi mulier, quae prima exiuit de gentium nationibus et perseueranti obsecratione tantum domini testimonium meruit reportare.

our Lord Jesus Christ bore witness that her faith was great. The grace of the gospel and the light of his august presence were already shining; yet, because she went out of her own accord and asked for mercy and confessed the Lord with a devout voice and, as though disdained, persevered in the cry of her petition, this woman received no small privilege, she who first went out from the nations of the gentiles and by persevering entreaty was found worthy to carry away so great a testimony from the Lord.

Explanation 43, chapter 51

43.51.1CSEL 64:297

In quo quidem loco uelut quosdam dubitasse cognoui, quid sit quod ait: non sum missus nisi ad oues quae perierunt domus Israel, quasi nobilitatem generis electi ad saluandas animas dominus quaesisse uideatur, qui uenit, ut omnes redimerentur. sed ostendere dignatus propositum, quod eos, quos primo elegerat, nequaquam refutare cupiebat et saepe deuios et errantes tamen paterno quodam reuocare quaerebat affectu. sed ubi ipsi auctorem proprium reliquerunt, sciens se deum montium esse, non uallium et regnum caelorum non a fastidientibus, sed a cogentibus diripi, paulatim conuersus ad gentes est, ut et nationum plus probaretur affectus et illorum merito pertinacia condemnaretur.

In this place I have learned that some have, as it were, doubted what it means that he says: “I was sent only to the sheep that have perished of the house of Israel”, as though the Lord, who came so that all might be redeemed, seemed to have sought nobility of chosen race for saving souls. But he deigned to show his purpose: that he in no way wished to reject those whom he had first chosen, and often sought, with a kind of fatherly affection, to call back those who strayed and wandered. But when they left their own author, knowing that he was a God of the mountains, not of the valleys, and that the kingdom of heaven is seized not by the disdainful but by the violent, he gradually turned to the gentiles, so that both the affection of the nations might be the more proved and their stubbornness deservedly condemned.

Explanation 43, chapter 52

43.52.1CSEL 64:297

Quid deinde sibi uult quod ait: non licet accipere panem filiorum et mittere catulis? utique filios dixit Israelitas, hoc est populum Iudaeorum, catulos autem populum nationum. quid ergo? diuitum aut nobiliorum est accipere sacramenta caelestia et non eorum, qui magis ad cognitionem mysterii caelestis pio mentis feruore contendant? et si Israelita fuerit aliquis remissus et neglegens uel contumax, qui reiciat post se sermones dei, Chananaeus autem, qui inpigre uelit adquirendis mentem intendere sacramentis, ille potius qui dissimulat quam iste qui defert studium praeferendus est? non utique.

What, then, does he mean by saying: “It is not lawful to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs”? Certainly he called the Israelites, that is, the people of the Jews, children, and the people of the nations dogs. What then? Does it belong to the rich or the more noble to receive the heavenly sacraments, and not to those who strive with a devout fervour of mind for the knowledge of the heavenly mystery? And if some Israelite is slack and negligent or stubborn, who casts the words of God behind him, but a Canaanite eagerly wishes to set his mind on acquiring the sacraments, is the one who pretends to be preferred to the one who offers zeal? Certainly not.

43.52.2CSEL 64:297–298

et ideo diligenter oportet intendi quid expresserit, qui cum dixisset: non licet accipere panem filiorum et mittere catulis, respondente Chananaea: quia et catuli canum edunt de micis quae cadunt de mensa dominorum suorum, studium eius humilitatemque laudauit, quae non sibi profundum sapientiae a primordio uindicauit, quamuis de finibus Tyri et Sidonis iam esset egressa, sed micas quasdam uerbi

And therefore we must attend carefully to what he expressed: when he had said, “It is not lawful to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs”, and the Canaanite woman answered, “For even the dogs eat of the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table”, he praised her zeal and humility, for she did not claim for herself the depth of wisdom from the beginning, although she had already gone out from the borders of Tyre and Sidon, but believed that certain crumbs of the saving

43.52.3CSEL 64:298

salutaris, quae de mensa dominorum suorum caderent, crederet colligendas. qui enim diligenter et subtiliter scripturae uerba rimatur, is ad altitudinem mysteriorum peruenire consueuit. unde et huic dicitur: magna est fides tua. fiat tibi sicut uis, hoc est: ut aperiatur tibi ostium uerbi et refulgeat uitae aeternae salubre mysterium.

word, falling from her masters’ table, should be gathered. For he who searches the words of Scripture diligently and subtly is accustomed to reach the height of the mysteries. Hence it is said to her too: “Great is your faith; let it be done for you as you will”, that is: let the door of the word be opened to you, and let the saving mystery of eternal life shine.

Explanation 43, chapter 53

43.53.1CSEL 64:298

Ergo qui uicinus est exeat et Christum uidere desideret et in oratione clamet, sicut ista Chananaea exiuit de finibus suis et Christum uidit et iugi uoce clamauit, ut eius misericordiam reportaret. credentibus itaque Chananaeis Iudaeus in obprobrio sit, quia ipse non credidit, et inludi sibi doleat et derideri se ab his qui in circuitu sunt ingemiscat.

So let him who is a neighbour go out and desire to see Christ and cry out in prayer, as this Canaanite woman went out from her borders and saw Christ and cried with unceasing voice, so as to carry away his mercy. So, while the Canaanites believe, let the Jew be in reproach, because he himself did not believe, and let him grieve that he is mocked and groan that he is derided by those around him.

Explanation 43, chapter 54

43.54.1CSEL 64:298

Et uidetur prophetia haec esse de nationibus credituris, maxime cum sequentia istud ostendant, quia ait: posuisti nos in similitudinem gentibus, commotionem capitis in populis, quia Iudaeorum delicto salus gentibus et quae in illis in figura gesta sunt ad cognitionem nostram profecisse apostolo auctore cognouimus. et uere in obprobrium positi sunt

And this prophecy seems to be about the nations that would believe, especially since what follows shows it, for he says: “You have made us a likeness to the nations, a shaking of the head among the peoples”, because by the offence of the Jews salvation came to the gentiles, and what was done among them in a figure has, as we know on the apostle’s authority, served our knowledge. And truly they were made a reproach

43.54.2CSEL 64:298

gentibus, quia gentes obprobrium crucis dominicae omnibus diuitiis saecularibus praetulerunt. qui autem crucem illam putauit obprobrium et quasi obprobrium refugit, is uere in diuturno mansit obprobrio. tamen quia non secundum carnem Israelitae uidentur qui potuerunt dicere: quia inique non egimus in testamento domini nec recessit retro cor eorum a domino, uide ne his se in circuitu positis inlusioni et derisui fuisse commemorent, de quibus dicit dominus: circumdederunt me uituli multi;

to the gentiles, because the gentiles preferred the reproach of the Lord’s cross to all the riches of the world. But he who thought that cross a reproach and fled it as a reproach truly remained in lasting reproach. Yet, since those who could say: “For we have not acted unjustly against the covenant of the Lord, and their heart has not turned back from the Lord” seem not to be Israelites according to the flesh, see whether they do not recall that they were a mockery and derision to those set around them, of whom the Lord says: “Many calves have surrounded me”;

43.54.3CSEL 64:298–299

circumdederunt enim eum persecutores, quando secundum consilium uoluntatis suae subiit passionem. unde et alibi ait: circumdantes circumdederunt me et in nomine domini ultus sum eos. ideo melius est uiam rectam tendere, in qua facinorosi ambulare non possunt; cito cadunt, quia non in directione ambulant. unde et illi, quando uoluerunt Iesum dominum comprehendere, ubi respexit eos, ceciderunt. propter hos igitur, qui in circuitu ambulare consuerunt, angelum dominus apposuit, qui a tergo insidiantes repellat inimicos. praetendit igitur angelus domini in circuitu timentium eum et eos tuetur atque custodit; in circuitu enim impii ambulant, sicut scriptum est. uide itaque distantiam.

for the persecutors surrounded him when, according to the counsel of his will, he underwent his passion. Hence elsewhere too he says: “Surrounding, they surrounded me, and in the name of the Lord I took vengeance on them.” Therefore it is better to keep to the straight way, in which the wicked cannot walk; they fall quickly, because they do not walk in uprightness. Hence those too, when they wished to seize the Lord Jesus, fell when he looked at them. Because of those, then, who are accustomed to walk around, the Lord has set an angel to drive back the enemies who lie in wait from behind. So the angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear him, and protects and guards them; for the ungodly walk around, as it is written. See, then, the difference.

43.54.4CSEL 64:299

impii in circuitu ambulant, angelus autem praetendit in circuitu eorum qui non ambulant in circuitu, et ideo praetendit, ut eruat iustos ab insidiis persequentium. iusti ergo spiritales Israelitae uidentur esse qui haec locuntur, eo quod temptationibus saeculi subiacuerint et obprobrium fuerint uicinorum, hoc est eorum qui Hierusalem patriam non incolebant, inlusioni etiam fuerint spiritalibus nequitiis et potestatibus, contra quas iustis lucta esse consueuit.

The ungodly walk around, but the angel encamps around those who do not walk around, and encamps so as to rescue the righteous from the snares of persecutors. So those who say these things seem to be righteous, spiritual Israelites, because they were subject to the temptations of the world and were a reproach to their neighbours, that is, to those who did not dwell in the homeland of Jerusalem, and were also a mockery to the spiritual wickednesses and powers against which the righteous are accustomed to wrestle.

43.54.5CSEL 64:299

denique historia te doceat, quod abducti Iudaei in Babyloniam, etsi propter peccata sua uidebantur esse subiecti, tamen multo meliores gentibus habebantur. peiores enim erant in circuitu eorum qui insultabant eis, cum ipsi peccatorum grauium essent mole curuati.

Finally, let history teach you that the Jews carried off to Babylon, although they seemed to be subjected because of their sins, were yet held to be much better than the gentiles. For those around them who insulted them were worse, since they themselves were bowed down under the weight of grave sins.

Explanation 43, chapter 55

43.55.1CSEL 64:299

Primus ergo intellectus de captiuis patribus usurpandus est, quibus insultauerunt Assyrii inludentes eis in Babylonia, quibus etiam rex ille nequissimus dominabatur Nabuchodonosor. secundus intellectus ad altiora referendus, quod saeuissimus rex diabolus est. ipse est Assyrius Nabuchodonosor qui bonis insidiari solet, ut eos in peccatum trahat per carnis inlecebram.

The first understanding, then, is to be applied to the captive fathers, whom the Assyrians insulted, mocking them in Babylon, over whom that most wicked king Nebuchadnezzar also ruled. The second understanding is to be referred to higher things: that the cruellest king is the devil. He is the Assyrian Nebuchadnezzar, who is accustomed to lie in wait for the good, so as to draw them into sin through the enticement of the flesh.

43.55.2CSEL 64:299–300

attende igitur hunc regem eo loco, ubi dicit apostolus: uideo legem carnis meae repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati, hoc est in illa lege carnalis inlecebrae. aduersarius leo est qui urget obnoxios, iustos fatigat unde pulchre posuit Aquilas: spretionem et

Notice this king, then, in that place where the apostle says: “I see a law of my flesh warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive in the law of sin”, that is, in that law of carnal enticement. The adversary is a lion who presses those who are liable and wears out the righteous; hence Aquila beautifully put: “Contempt and

43.55.3CSEL 64:300

pompam posuisti nos his qui in circuitu nostro sunt. ita enim despicabiles aestimabantur, qui theatrum facti sunt huic mundo et angelis et hominibus, quia, etsi in testamento non peccent dei nec carnis inlecebris reflectantur a domino, tamen quasi in pompa quadam circumferri uidentur et despici, quandoquidem peccatores humilitati iustorum insultare consueuerint, ut

a show you have made us to those around us.” For those were thought so despicable who were made a spectacle to this world and to angels and to men, because, even if they do not sin against the covenant of God nor are turned from the Lord by the enticements of the flesh, yet they seem to be carried about as in a kind of procession and despised, since sinners are accustomed to insult the humility of the righteous, so as to

43.55.4CSEL 64:300

obprobrium ducant crucem domini saluatoris humilitatemque iustorum. denique quasi in quadam pompa theatri constitutus apostolus dicit: placeo mihi in iniuriis, in necessitatibus, in persecutionibus, in angustiis. in WS placet qui omnia quae mundi sunt ut detrimentum putat, ut Christum lucri faciat, solum per uitam et mortem requirens, cui uiuere Christus est et mori lucrum, ut inueniatur in Christo.

count the cross of the Lord Saviour and the humility of the righteous a reproach. Finally, set as it were in a kind of theatrical procession, the apostle says: “I am content with insults, with hardships, with persecutions, with distresses.” He is content in these who counts everything of the world as loss, so as to gain Christ, seeking him alone through life and death, for whom to live is Christ and to die is gain, that he may be found in Christ.

Explanation 43, chapter 56

43.56.1CSEL 64:300–301

Adiciunt adhuc isti Israelitae dicentes: posuisti nos in parabolam gentibus, commotionem capitis in populis. quibus gentibus positi nisi credituris? etenim quae acciderunt Iudaeis, in similitudinem [figura] facta sunt, ut fieret nobis typus et figura excidium Iudaeorum atque ex illa similitudine per parabolam solutionem praesentibus requiramus, quo exempla eorum cauere possimus; deinde, quia Iudaicae res omnes quasi parabolae sunt, hoc est quasi figurae egentes solutione. denique dominus Iudaeis in parabola loquebatur, ut inperiti non intellegerent, intellegerent sapientes, ut intellegebant apostoli et in quo mouebantur interrogabant dominum; Iudaei autem nec intellegebant nec iterum discere non intellecta cupiebant.

These Israelites add further, saying: “You have made us a parable to the nations, a shaking of the head among the peoples.” To which nations were they made so, if not to those that would believe? For what happened to the Jews was done in a likeness, so that the destruction of the Jews might become a type and figure for us, and from that likeness, through the parable, we might seek the solution for present things, so that we can beware of their examples; and further, because all the affairs of the Jews are, as it were, parables, that is, as it were, figures needing a solution. Finally, the Lord spoke to the Jews in parables, so that the unlearned might not understand, but the wise might understand, as the apostles understood and asked the Lord about what troubled them; but the Jews neither understood nor wished to learn what they had not understood.

Explanation 43, chapter 57

43.57.1CSEL 64:301

Quid sit parabola, accipe: Abraham igitur duos filios habuit, unum de ancilla et unum de libera. non intellegebat hoc Iudaeus nisi secundum litteram; nesciebat quis de filiis duobus acceperit hereditatem patris, quia ad carnalia propendebat. egebat parabola solutione. uenit gentium doctor et fides nationum et intellexit, quod duae illae mulieres duo sint testamenta, unum a monte Sina, quod in seruitutem generauit populum Iudaeorum quod est Agar; et ideo Sina, quod per interpretationem mensuram eius significat; mensura autem legis est, superabundans autem gratia est.

Learn what a parable is: Abraham, then, had two sons, one by the slave woman and one by the free woman. The Jew did not understand this except according to the letter; he did not know which of the two sons received the father’s inheritance, because he inclined to carnal things. The parable needed a solution. The teacher of the gentiles and the faith of the nations came and understood that those two women are two covenants, one from Mount Sinai, which bore the people of the Jews into slavery, which is Hagar; and therefore Sinai, which by interpretation means “its measure”; and the measure is of the law, but grace is superabundant.

43.57.2CSEL 64:301

Sina quoque merces dicitur et conuenit populo Iudaeorum, qui iustificari se mercede operum quam fidei gratia maluerunt. ergo quae sub lege erat Hierusalem cum suis filiis seruiebat, quae autem sursum est Hierusalem libera est. et ideo Sarra, quae principalis dicitur, libertatem habet, quod princeps sui sit qui iustus atque integer est.

Sinai also means “wage”, and it suits the people of the Jews, who preferred to be justified by the wage of works rather than by the grace of faith. So the Jerusalem which was under the law was in slavery with her children, but the Jerusalem above is free. And therefore Sarah, whose name means “princess”, has freedom, because he who is righteous and upright is his own master.

43.57.3CSEL 64:301

ex duobus igitur testamentis duo populi, unus Iudaeorum, alius nationum qui in Christo credidit. ille Iudaeorum qui non credidit seruit; ipse est secundum carnem natus, quia secundum carnem interpretatus est scripturam diuinam et secundum litteram, non secundum spiritum. qui autem de libera, natus est per repromissionem, hoc est cui repromissio ex fide.

From the two covenants, then, come two peoples, one of the Jews, the other of the nations, which believed in Christ. That of the Jews which did not believe is in slavery; it is the one born according to the flesh, because it interpreted divine Scripture according to the flesh and according to the letter, not according to the spirit. But the one from the free woman was born through promise, that is, the one to whom the promise is from faith.

43.57.4CSEL 64:301–302

ipse est ecclesiae filius tenens gratiae libertatem, propter quem ecclesia dicit: expelle ancillam et filium eius; non enim heres erit filius ancillae cum filio meo Isaac, et apostolus ait: itaque, fratres, non sumus ancillae filii, sed liberae. haec est ergo solutio, quia quod ignorabat Iudaeus fides gentium soluit infusa a Paulo doctore mentibus nationum. ideo ergo illorum gesta nobis in parabola sunt.

He is the son of the church, holding the freedom of grace, because of whom the church says: “Cast out the slave woman and her son; for the son of the slave woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac”; and the apostle says: “So, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free.” This, then, is the solution: that what the Jew did not know, the faith of the gentiles solved, poured into the minds of the nations by Paul the teacher. Therefore, then, their deeds are a parable for us.

Explanation 43, chapter 58

43.58.1CSEL 64:302

Sed et dominus dixit: factus sum illis in parabolam. aduersus me exercebantur qui sedebant in porta, in parabolam autem factus, quia dicitis, inquit: medice, cura te ipsum. in parabolam factus est, quia sedentes in porta increpabat; in exitu enim non otiosi, sed exerciti esse debemus. ideoque scriptum est: uidete ne fiat fuga

But the Lord too said: “I became a parable to them. Those who sat in the gate were busy against me.” He became a parable, because, he says, you say: “Physician, heal yourself.” He became a parable because he rebuked those sitting in the gate; for at the going out we ought not to be idle but exercised. And therefore it is written: “See that your flight be not

43.58.2CSEL 64:302

uestra hieme uel sabbato, hoc est non in otio, sed in negotio. ergo pigri sedebant Iudaei, quia stare non poterant qui uerae Hierusalem atria nesciebant; si enim scientes essent, illam Hierusalem requisissent. isti ergo fatigati in porta sedebant. nec solum dixit sedebant, sed etiam oderant dominum in portis redarguentem. in porta enim erat qui subiturus erat sui corporis passionem, per quam migraret e terris, rediret ad caelum. in porta erat, cum diceret: ambulate dum lucem habetis.

in winter or on the sabbath”, that is, not in idleness but in business. So the Jews sat sluggish, because those who did not know the courts of the true Jerusalem could not stand; for if they had known, they would have sought that Jerusalem. So, wearied, they sat in the gate. And he did not only say “they sat”, but also that they hated the Lord who reproved them in the gates. For he was in the gate who was to undergo the passion of his body, through which he would depart from the earth and return to heaven. He was in the gate when he said: “Walk while you have the light.”

43.58.3CSEL 64:302

quid est ergo: factus sum illis in parabolam, nisi quia finis legis est Christus et mors eius soluit aenigmata prophetarum eaque, quae ante Iudaeis erant incognita, cum prophetarentur, postea manifestata sunt dominicae passionis effectu? factus est illis in parabolam, quia quasi uilem se praebuit, ingerens se illis nec refugiens eorum seditiones et perducens eos ad tempus beneplaciti sibi, ut moreretur pro omnibus hominibus, quo illius sanguine genus hominum mundaretur.

What, then, is “I became a parable to them”, unless that Christ is the end of the law, and his death solved the riddles of the prophets, and the things that had been unknown to the Jews when they were prophesied were afterwards made plain by the effect of the Lord’s passion? He became a parable to them because he offered himself as though cheap, putting himself forward to them and not fleeing their seditions, and leading them on to the time of his good pleasure, so as to die for all men, so that by his blood the human race might be cleansed.

Explanation 43, chapter 59

43.59.1CSEL 64:302

Similiter in parabola scriptum est: non alligabis os boui trituranti. soluit hanc parabolam apostolus dicens: numquid de bubus cura est deo? an propter nos utique dicit? nam propter nos scripta sunt.

Likewise it is written in a parable: “You shall not muzzle the ox that treads out the grain.” The apostle solved this parable, saying: “Is it for oxen that God is concerned? Or does he not speak entirely for our sake? For it was written for our sake.”

43.59.2CSEL 64:302–303

quis est qui arat nisi qui in spe arat, ut in iudicio domini metat? et ideo quasi boni agricolae, ubi propter spem inarata fuerit terra nostra continentia corporali, non carnalia, sed spiritalia seminemus, quoniam de carnalibus corruptela colligitur, de spiritalibus uita aeterna adquiritur. typus itaque et figura nobis sint gesta maiorum, typus lex scripta in cordibus nostris, ut nobis in ea quaedam futurorum figura, non ueritas sit. lex ergo quasi figura sit nobis, euangelium quasi lumen et signaculum ueritatis.

Who is it who ploughs but he who ploughs in hope, so as to reap in the Lord’s judgment? And therefore, like good farmers, when for hope’s sake our earth has been ploughed by bodily continence, let us sow not carnal things but spiritual, since from carnal things corruption is gathered, from spiritual things eternal life is gained. So let the deeds of our forefathers be a type and figure for us; a type is the law written in our hearts, so that there is in it for us a kind of figure of things to come, not the truth. So let the law be for us as a figure, the gospel as the light and seal of truth.

Explanation 43, chapter 60

43.60.1CSEL 64:303

In parabola ergo dominus ostendit se Iudaeis, sed non intellexerunt parabolam, quia medicum non receperunt, qui curaret animas laborantium et omni aegritudine et inaequalitate incommoditatis absolueret. factus est etiam in parabolam, quia carnem suscepit quam crucifixerunt Iudaei, non intellegentes parabolam spiritalem.

In a parable, then, the Lord showed himself to the Jews, but they did not understand the parable, because they did not receive the physician who would cure the souls of the suffering and free them from every sickness and the unevenness of ailment. He also became a parable because he took on flesh, which the Jews crucified, not understanding the spiritual parable.

43.60.2CSEL 64:303

eo usque enim non intellexerunt, ut, cum auctorem uitae crucifigerent et suspensam in cruce cernerent carnem domini salutarem, mouerent caput; nam si intellexissent, utique non insultassent, sed ingemuissent. et tamen ipsa commotio capitis illis in similitudinem cessit, ut non hoc significaret quod illi sentiebant, sed quod mysteria declarabant. illi enim secundum uulgi usum insultantes domino mouebant caput suum, sicut qui iustis insultare desiderant, si forte eos uiderint in hoc saeculo fatigari, mouent caput.

So far did they fail to understand that, when they crucified the author of life and saw the saving flesh of the Lord hanging on the cross, they shook their heads; for if they had understood, they would certainly not have insulted but groaned. And yet that very shaking of the head became for them a likeness, so that it signified not what they meant but what the mysteries declared. For they, insulting the Lord after the common custom, shook their heads, as those who wish to insult the righteous shake their heads if they happen to see them wearied in this world.

Explanation 43, chapter 61

43.61.1CSEL 64:303–304

Quae commotio capitis geminum intellectum habet. reprehensibiles enim uidentur secundum scripturae auctoritatem qui mouent caput, cum dicat et Matthaeus: qui transiebant blasphemabant dominum Iesum mouentes capita sua, et Marcus: qui praeteribant blasphemabant eum mouentes capita sua. transeuntes autem quod reprehensibiles aestimentur, docet hic ipse propheta, qui dicit de uinea Sabaoth:

This shaking of the head has a twofold meaning. For those who shake their heads seem blameworthy by the authority of Scripture, since Matthew too says: “Those who passed by blasphemed the Lord Jesus, shaking their heads”, and Mark: “Those who passed by blasphemed him, shaking their heads.” That those who pass by are thought blameworthy this same prophet teaches, who says of the vineyard of the Lord of hosts:

43.61.2CSEL 64:304

et uindemiant eam omnes transeuntes uiam. denique et qui sequitur uersus hoc signat: deuastauit eam aper de silua et singularis ferus depastus est eam, et in posterioribus ait: et non dixerunt transeuntes uiam: benedictio domini super uos, eo quod, qui transit et non stat in atriis domini, non dat benedictionem. ita ergo Iudaei mouebant caput super dominum Iesum, ut praeterirent qui firmum solidumque uestigium fidei habere non poterant. mouebant autem

“And all who pass along the way pluck its grapes.” Finally the following verse too signifies this: “The boar from the wood has laid it waste, and the solitary wild beast has fed on it”; and further on he says: “And those who passed by the way did not say: The blessing of the Lord be upon you”, because he who passes by and does not stand in the courts of the Lord does not give a blessing. So the Jews shook their heads over the Lord Jesus, as passers-by who could not have a firm and solid footing of faith. And they shook

43.61.3CSEL 64:304

caput suum, quorum caput Christus esse debuerat, quem non debuit demouere et deturbare perfidia Iudaeorum. sed quia non passi sunt membra se esse Christi, ideo caput eorum non fuit Christus. non erat etiam lex caput eorum, quia expoliabantur et lege a populo nationum. non fuit his caput uerbum dei, quia amiserant prophetas et apostolos non habebant. hoc de reprehensibili commotione capitis dictum sit. est tamen et laudabilis capitis commotio, reprehensibilis Iudaeis, laudabilis populo nationum.

their own head, whose head Christ ought to have been, whom the faithlessness of the Jews ought not to have moved and disturbed. But since they did not allow themselves to be members of Christ, Christ was not their head. Nor was the law their head either, because they were being stripped even of the law by the people of the nations. The word of God was not their head, because they had lost the prophets and did not have the apostles. Let this be said about the blameworthy shaking of the head. But there is also a praiseworthy shaking of the head: blameworthy in the Jews, praiseworthy in the people of the nations.

43.61.4CSEL 64:304

quid est enim caput nisi in quo sensus sunt? oculi sapientis in capite eius, quos moueri oportet oculos, id est mentis tuae sensus, ne aliquo torpore pigrescant. moue ergo prudentiam tuam, moue sapientiam, moue cogitationes tuas caelestium conlatione sermonum et propheticorum disputatione uerborum, ita ut non pecces in testamento dei, sed fides firma sit. sunt enim haeretici qui mouent sensus suos, ut perfidiam tamen, non fidem excitent.

For what is the head but that in which the senses are? “The eyes of the wise man are in his head”; these eyes must be moved, that is, the senses of your mind, lest they grow sluggish with some torpor. Move, then, your prudence, move your wisdom, move your thoughts by comparing the heavenly sayings and discussing the prophetic words, so that you do not sin against the covenant of God, but your faith is firm. For there are heretics who move their senses, yet so as to stir up faithlessness, not faith.

Explanation 43, chapter 62

43.62.1CSEL 64:304–305

Sed iam expressius de ipsa capitis commotione, quae in similitudinem populi est posita, dicendum est. quis est caput populorum nisi Christus? caput enim mulieris uir, caput uiri Christus, sed et lex caput intellegibilis mulieris. denique sub lege tamquam sub uiro est populus Iudaeorum, quia lex νόμος dicitur Graece et ideo synagoga νόμῳ qua masculo copulata est, sed legi corporali, non spiritali, hoc est ritui legis Iudaico, cuius uinculis inligata est legitimi nesciens sacramenta coniugii.

But now we must speak more expressly of the shaking of the head itself, which is made a likeness for the people. Who is the head of the peoples but Christ? For “the head of the woman is the man, the head of the man is Christ”; but the law too is the head of the woman understood spiritually. Finally the people of the Jews is under the law as under a husband, because the law is called nomos in Greek, and therefore the synagogue is joined to the law as to a male, but to the bodily law, not the spiritual, that is, to the Jewish ritual of the law, by whose bonds it is tied, not knowing the sacraments of lawful marriage.

43.62.2CSEL 64:305

si autem mortua fuerit lex, hoc est legis interpretatio corporalis, tunc plebs quasi mortuo coniuge priore legitime nubet secundo uiro qui ex mortuis resurrexit. est etiam caput mulieris huius euangelium. unde quidam mystice interpretati mortificato ritu Iudaico tamquam fratri defuncti euangelio mulierem eam nubere ex lege uoluerunt, quia lex annuntiauerit euangelium. ideo prior lex uir, postea secundi uiri nuptiae, hoc est euangelii sacramenta sunt; duo enim quasi coniugia duo sunt testamenta. unum coniugium uetus est testamentum, quod morte uiri prioris solutum est.

But if the law has died, that is, the bodily interpretation of the law, then the people, as though its former husband were dead, will lawfully marry a second husband, who rose from the dead. The gospel too is the head of this woman. Hence some, interpreting mystically, have held that, once the Jewish ritual had been put to death, the woman marries the gospel, as the brother of the deceased, according to the law, because the law announced the gospel. So the law was the first husband; afterwards came the marriage to the second husband, that is, the sacraments of the gospel; for the two covenants are like two marriages. One marriage is the Old Testament, which was dissolved by the death of the first husband.

43.62.3CSEL 64:305

et ideo mulier illa, cui lex mortua est, recte secundum coniugium conuenit, hoc est testamentum nouum. sic duobus fratribus una coniungitur, cui superiora peccata moriuntur, meliora postea sacramenta renouantur. hoc nobis apostolus euidenter exposuit dicens: quoniam quae sub uiro est mulier uiuente uiro ligata est legi; hoc est uiri sui legi, ut ei debeat castitatem.

And therefore that woman for whom the law has died rightly comes to a second marriage, that is, the New Testament. So one woman is joined to two brothers, for whom her former sins die and better sacraments are afterwards renewed. This the apostle clearly explained to us, saying: “For the woman who is under a husband is bound to the law while the husband lives”, that is, to the law of her husband, so that she owes him chastity.

43.62.4CSEL 64:305

si autem mortuus fuerit uir, soluta est a lege uiri, id est ut cui uelit nubat, dummodo mortuo uiro nubat, quia uiuo uiro uocabitur, inquit, adultera, si iuncta fuerit alteri uiro; si autem mortuus fuerit uir eius, liberata est a lege uiri, ita ut non sit adultera, si fuerit cum alio uiro.

“But if the husband dies, she is freed from the law of the husband”, that is, so that she may marry whom she will, provided she marries after her husband is dead; because, “while the husband lives,” he says, “she will be called an adulteress if she is joined to another man; but if her husband dies, she is freed from the law of the husband, so that she is not an adulteress if she is with another man.”

43.62.5CSEL 64:305–306

hoc sacramentum etiam ad Christum et ecclesiam pertinere etiam alibi demonstrauit, quia magnum est sacramentum. hic quoque non praetermisit dicens: itaque, fratres mei, et uos mortificati estis legi per corpus Christi, ut sitis alterius qui ex mortuis resurrexit. quomodo mortificatus es legi nisi ut tibi legis umbra moriatur cum accedis ad sacramenta caelestia? nec enim aliter debes accedere ad euangelium nisi

That this sacrament also concerns Christ and the church he showed elsewhere too, because it is a great sacrament. Here also he did not pass it over, saying: “So, my brothers, you too have been put to death to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, who rose from the dead.” How have you been put to death to the law, except that the shadow of the law dies for you when you come to the heavenly sacraments? For you ought not to come to the gospel otherwise than

43.62.6CSEL 64:306

solutus interpretationis corporalis impedimentis. alioquin adulterium est ueris falsa miscere, pudicitia autem spiritalis, si anima tua exuta omnibus impedimentis deuiae cognitionis sine ruga accedat ad dei uerbum. ergo sicut ecclesiae caput Christus, ita et synagogae caput lex, hoc est his qui sub lege sunt, propter quos apostolus fecit se esse sub lege, cum sub lege non esset, ut eos qui sub lege sunt lucri faceret. et iterum doctor gentium factus est quasi esset ipse sine lege, ut eos qui erant sine lege adquireret Christo. pulchre autem ait, quod sine lege dei non esset et in lege Christi maneret.

freed from the hindrances of bodily interpretation. Otherwise it is adultery to mix false things with true, but it is spiritual chastity if your soul, stripped of all the hindrances of errant knowledge, comes without wrinkle to the word of God. So, as Christ is the head of the church, so the law is the head of the synagogue, that is, of those who are under the law, for whose sake the apostle made himself as under the law, though he was not under the law, so as to win those who are under the law. And again the teacher of the gentiles became as though he were himself without law, so as to gain for Christ those who were without law. And beautifully he says that he was not without the law of God but remained in the law of Christ.

Explanation 43, chapter 63

43.63.1CSEL 64:306

Lex autem synagogae caput non a principio, quia Christus erat caput ueteris synagogae quam Moyses fundauit et condidit. denique audi dicentem, quia uerbo domini fundata est: fide, inquit, Moyses grandis factus negauit se esse Pharaonis regis nepotem; maluit enim afflictis compati quam temporalibus delectari maioresque diuitias aestimauit et praetulit thesauris Aegypti improperium Christi; aspi-

But the law was not the head of the synagogue from the beginning, because Christ was the head of the old synagogue which Moses founded and built. Finally, hear that it was founded by the word of the Lord: “By faith,” he says, “Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be called the grandson of Pharaoh the king; for he chose rather to suffer with the afflicted than to enjoy temporal pleasures, and he esteemed the reproach of Christ greater riches and preferred it to the treasures of Egypt;

43.63.2CSEL 64:306

ciebat enim mercedem repromissionum dei, quae est resurrectionis gratia. sed ubi propter perfidiam Iudaeorum mortuum est infidelibus dei uerbum et excidit pectoribus Iudaeorum, legis spiritalis intellectus occubuit et nupsit synagoga ritui corporali obseruationique perfidiae. sed non fuit illa sobrietas spiritalium nuptiarum, sed adulterium castitatis. ideo synagoga libera esse non

for he was looking to the reward of God’s promises”, which is the grace of the resurrection. But when, through the faithlessness of the Jews, the word of God died for the unbelieving and fell from the hearts of the Jews, the spiritual understanding of the law perished, and the synagogue married the bodily rite and the observance of faithlessness. But that was not the sobriety of a spiritual marriage but an adultery against chastity. Therefore the synagogue could not be free,

43.63.3CSEL 64:306–307

potuit, quae male nupserat, non crediderat resurrectionem Christi futuram. unde bene ei nupsit ecclesia, cui secundum sacram dispensationem secundum carnem mortuus Christus, ut illa Iudaea anima, quae ante fuerat ligata peccato, per mortem Christi absolueretur uinculo delictorum. non nubit ergo mulier alteri uiro nisi mortuus fuerit uir suus, hoc est nisi a uinculo legitimi amoris fuerit absoluta; si autem mortuus uir eius fuerit, liberata est.

having married badly, not having believed that Christ’s resurrection would come. Hence the church rightly married him, for whom Christ died according to the flesh in the sacred dispensation, so that that Jewish soul, which had before been bound to sin, might be freed by the death of Christ from the bond of offences. So a woman does not marry another husband unless her husband has died, that is, unless she has been freed from the bond of lawful love; but if her husband has died, she is free.

Explanation 43, chapter 64

43.64.1CSEL 64:307

Sane tenebatur ex lege, ut fratri proprii coniugis copularetur, si semen nullum maritus eidem reliquisset. quod uinculum magis nectebat interpretatio litterae quam gratia spiritalis. denique habebat in uoluntate frater defuncti, ut, si nollet, non acciperet fratris uxorem ad semen defuncti resuscitandum. unde calciamentum suum soluere iubebatur, ut esset a nexu copulae eius exutus quam a sui gratia ostendisset alienam.

Indeed, by the law a woman was held to be joined to the brother of her own husband, if the husband had left her no offspring. This bond the interpretation of the letter tied more tightly than spiritual grace did. Finally, the brother of the deceased had it in his choice, if he was unwilling, not to take his brother’s wife to raise up offspring for the dead man. Hence he was commanded to loose his shoe, so as to be released from the tie of union with her, whom he had shown to be outside his favour.

43.64.2CSEL 64:307

sic enim scriptum est, quia soluebat calciamentum suum et dabat proximo suo dicens: hoc erit in testimonium in Israel. et dicebat propinquus: accipe et adquire tibi tu. et soluebat calciamentum suum. dicebant etiam adstantes: det dominus uxorem quae intrat in domum tuam, sicut Rachel et sicut Lia quae aedificauerunt utraeque domum Israel et fecerunt uirtutem in Ephratha.

For so it is written, that he loosed his shoe and gave it to his neighbour, saying: “This will be a testimony in Israel.” And the kinsman said: “Take it and acquire it for yourself.” And he loosed his shoe. And the bystanders said: “May the Lord make the wife who comes into your house like Rachel and like Leah, who both built up the house of Israel and did valiantly in Ephrathah.”

43.64.3CSEL 64:307

sed hoc ex litterae interpretatione Iudaeum ligabat; ceterum figura erat, quod Christus uenturus esset in terras, qui semen defuncti populi resuscitaret merito fratris, quia dictum est: narrabo nomen tuum fratribus meis, et: quorum patres, et ex quibus Christus secundum carnem, uel quia euangelium defunctae legis reparationem operaretur in posteris, ut semen, quod lex non reliquerat, euangelii tenor resuscitaret.

But this, by the interpretation of the letter, bound the Jew; otherwise it was a figure that Christ would come to earth, to raise up the offspring of the dead people by right of a brother, because it was said: “I will tell your name to my brothers”, and: “Whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh”; or because the gospel would work the restoration of the dead law in the descendants, so that the tenor of the gospel would raise up the offspring which the law had not left.

Explanation 43, chapter 65

43.65.1CSEL 64:307–308

Non mirum ergo si caput suum praua interpretatione mouerunt, ut ipsi a se deturbarent sapientiam, suae salutis auctorem aut certe mouendo caput suum causa fierent commotionis capitis non paucis, sed populis. commotio haec capitis facta est, quandoquidem in omnem terram exiuit sonus eorum, ut fieret omnis terra domini et regnum domini esset in nationibus. unde et in posterioribus dicit: dominus regnauit, irascantur populi;

No wonder, then, if they shook their heads by a wrong interpretation, so as to cast away from themselves wisdom, the author of their own salvation; or at least, by shaking their head, became the cause of a shaking of the head not for a few but for peoples. This shaking of the head came about since their sound went out into all the earth, so that the whole earth became the Lord’s and the kingdom of the Lord was among the nations. Hence he says further on: “The Lord has reigned; let the peoples be angry;

43.65.2CSEL 64:308

qui sedes super Cherubim, moueatur terra. quod pulchre Aquilas interpretatus est, ut μετάστασιν diceret, hoc est transmutationem quae est de loco ad locum, de Iudaea ad populos nationum. quod ex ea lectione quae in euangelio est liquido poterit manifestari, quemadmodum lex mota sit, dicente scriptura: super cathedram Moysi sederunt scribae et Pharisaei. omnia ergo quae dicunt uobis seruate et facite, secundum opera eorum nolite facere; quae enim dicunt non faciunt. alligant autem onera grauia et imponunt super umeros hominum, ipsi autem digito suo nolunt ea mouere. omnia autem faciunt ut uideantur ab hominibus.

you who sit upon the Cherubim, let the earth be moved.” Aquila beautifully rendered this, saying metastasis, that is, a change from place to place, from Judea to the peoples of the nations. How the law was moved can be made clear from the reading in the gospel, Scripture saying: “The scribes and Pharisees have sat on Moses’ seat. So keep and do all that they tell you, but do not do according to their works; for they say and do not do. They bind heavy burdens and lay them on men’s shoulders, but they themselves will not move them with their finger. And they do all their works to be seen by men.”

Explanation 43, chapter 66

43.66.1CSEL 64:308

Quid est sederunt scribae, nisi quia littera scribitur? unde et γραμματεῖς Graece dicuntur scribae, litterae sequentes interpretationem, non spiritus intellectum; littera autem occidit. litteram ergo occidentem sequentes et ipsa appellatione resonantes scribae et Pharisaei sunt, hoc est qui a ueritatis unitate diuisi sunt; phares enim interpretatur diuisio. diuidunt autem Pharisaei

What is “the scribes have sat”, if not that the letter is written? Hence scribes are also called grammateis in Greek, following the interpretation of the letter, not the understanding of the spirit; but the letter kills. So those who follow the killing letter and echo it in their very name are the scribes and Pharisees, that is, those who are divided from the unity of the truth; for phares is interpreted “division”. And the Pharisees divide

43.66.2CSEL 64:308–309

hoc genere uerba legis, ut resonent et in ipsa meditentur, spiritalis autem mysteria legis et sacramenta non uideant. nam si lex spiritalis est, utique praecepta legis sunt spiritalia et opera eius spiritalia sunt. dicentes ergo quae Moyses scripsit onera grauia ligant corporalibus legis — grauia sunt enim quae contraria iugo Christi sunt — et per doctrinam suam deuiam grauia onera imponunt auribus audientium, quae ipsi ne tantum quidem uolunt mouere, ut a corporalibus legis ad spiritalia scripturae uerba commoueant. sic enim intellegendum, quia digito suo nolunt mouere illa, hoc est nec exiguo puncto atque momento transferunt se ad intellegentiam spiritalem.

the words of the law in this way: so that they echo them and meditate on them, but do not see the spiritual mysteries and sacraments of the law. For if the law is spiritual, surely the precepts of the law are spiritual and its works are spiritual. So, saying what Moses wrote, they bind heavy burdens with the bodily things of the law — for heavy are the things contrary to the yoke of Christ — and by their errant teaching lay heavy burdens on the ears of the hearers, which they themselves will not move even so much as to shift them from the bodily things of the law to the spiritual words of Scripture. For so it must be understood that they will not move them with their finger, that is, not even by a small point and moment do they transfer themselves to spiritual understanding.

43.66.3CSEL 64:309

est et illud, quia scriptum est: quodsi in digito dei ego eicio daemonia. quid sit digitus, interpretatur ipsa scriptura, quae dicit in alio libro euangelii: quod in spiritu dei ego eicio daemonia. digitus ergo dei spiritus dei est; deus enim spiritus est et nihil habet in sua substantia corporale, sed totus est spiritus. in spiritu ergo dei eicit daemonium qui in digito dei eicit. unde et sanctus Dauid ait: quoniam uidebo caelos tuos, opera digitorum tuorum, hoc est: spiritus tui opera sunt caeli, sicut et scriptum est: uerbo domini caeli firmati sunt et spiritu oris eius omnis uirtus eorum.

There is also this, that it is written: “But if I cast out demons by the finger of God.” What the finger is, Scripture itself interprets, which says in another book of the gospel: “That I cast out demons by the Spirit of God.” The finger of God, then, is the Spirit of God; for God is spirit and has nothing bodily in his substance, but is wholly spirit. So he who casts out by the finger of God casts out the demon by the Spirit of God. Hence holy David too says: “For I shall see your heavens, the works of your fingers”, that is, the heavens are the works of your Spirit, as it is also written: “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made firm, and by the Spirit of his mouth all their power.”

Explanation 43, chapter 67

43.67.1CSEL 64:309

Ut ergo concludamus disputationem, scribae et Pharisaei nihil ad interiorem hominem referunt, qui, ut ipse est ad imaginem dei et similitudinem factus, ita in his, quae cogitat et quae meditatur, debet magis quae spiritalia sunt quam quae carnalia cogitare. totum ergo ad illum exteriorem, ad illum terrenum hominem referre contendunt et ideo omnia eorum talia sunt, ut uideantur ab hominibus, non ut placeant patri qui in abscondito uidet; timent enim sua opera reuelare.

To conclude the discussion, then: the scribes and Pharisees refer nothing to the inner man, who, as he himself is made to the image and likeness of God, so in what he thinks and meditates ought to think rather of spiritual than of carnal things. They strive to refer everything to that outer, that earthly man, and therefore all their works are such as to be seen by men, not to please the Father who sees in secret; for they fear to reveal their works.

Explanation 43, chapter 68

43.68.1CSEL 64:309–310

Haec est ergo commotio capitis quae facta est in populis uel, sicut Aquilas et Symmachus dixerunt: in gentibus; omnes enim gentes mouerunt caput suum, ut legem spiritaliter interpretarentur. nemo secundum litteram legis se putet esse saluandum, quia littera legis maledictum habet, spiritus benedictionem affert.

This, then, is the shaking of the head that took place among the peoples, or, as Aquila and Symmachus said, among the gentiles; for all the gentiles shook their heads so as to interpret the law spiritually. Let no one think that he will be saved according to the letter of the law, because the letter of the law has a curse, the Spirit brings a blessing.

43.68.2CSEL 64:310

nemo ex operibus legis iustificari potest, quia sub maledicto sunt omnes qui sub littera sunt. fugiant ergo omnes maledictum legis et confugiant ad benedictionis gratiam, ut benedictionem habeant in caelestibus in Christo Iesu, qui mortuus est pro nobis, ut fides transiret ad gentes, qui, etsi uir fuit ante synagogae, nec ipsam deseruit et nos redemit.

No one can be justified by the works of the law, because all who are under the letter are under a curse. Let all flee, then, the curse of the law and take refuge in the grace of blessing, so as to have the blessing in heavenly places in Christ Jesus, who died for us so that faith might pass to the gentiles, he who, though he was formerly the husband of the synagogue, did not desert it and redeemed us.

43.68.3CSEL 64:310

illam enim non deseruit, ut reliquiae saluae fierent, nos redemit eligendo populos nationum. haec ergo electio gentium salus Iudaeis; reliquiae enim non per opera sua, sed per electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. gratia est ergo Christi, quae et nos redemit et reliquias uiuificauit. commotio autem capitis facta est gentibus, sed ex hac commotione non mediocris mutationis Iudaei gratiam pertulerunt, quorum reliquiae saluae factae sunt.

For he did not desert it, so that a remnant might be saved; he redeemed us by choosing the peoples of the nations. This choice of the gentiles, then, is salvation for the Jews; for the remnant was saved not by its own works but by the election of grace. It is, then, the grace of Christ which both redeemed us and gave life to the remnant. The shaking of the head took place among the gentiles, but from this shaking the Jews received the grace of no small change, a remnant of whom has been saved.

Explanation 43, chapter 69

43.69.1CSEL 64:310

Sequitur: tota die uerecundia mea contra me est et confusio uultus mei operuit me. quid est quod interdum ex persona unius, interdum ex persona plurimorum psalmus hic dicitur? namque a principio a pluribus coepit, ut est: deus, auribus nostris audiuimus et cetera quae secuntur; deinde ait: tu es ipse rex meus et deus meus, iterum: in te inimicos nostros uentilabimus et postea: non in arcu meo sperabo et: in deo laudabimur tota die et:

There follows: “All the day my shame is before me, and the confusion of my face has covered me.” Why is this psalm said sometimes in the person of one, sometimes in the person of many? For from the beginning it started with many, as in: “O God, with our ears we have heard”, and the rest that follows; then he says: “You are yourself my king and my God”; again: “In you we will toss our enemies”; and afterwards: “I will not hope in my bow”, and: “In God we shall be praised all the day”, and:

43.69.2CSEL 64:310–311

tota die uerecundia mea contra me est. quid sibi uult ista mutatio, quae frequenter in psalmis repetitur, sicut et in centesimo octauo psalmo ait: deus, laudem meam ne tacueris, quia os peccatoris et os dolosi super me apertum est? hoc de uno; sequitur de pluribus: locuti sunt aduersum me lingua dolosa, et odium pro dilectione mea. deinde de uno: constitue super eum peccatorem.

“All the day my shame is before me.” What does this change mean, which is often repeated in the psalms, as in the hundred and eighth psalm he says: “O God, do not keep silent about my praise, because the mouth of the sinner and the mouth of the deceitful is opened against me”? This is of one; there follows of many: “They spoke against me with a deceitful tongue, and hatred for my love.” Then of one: “Set a sinner over him.”

43.69.3CSEL 64:311

quod uidetur in centesimo octauo psalmo aliud ad populum Iudaeorum referri, aliud ad ludam proditorem; quando pluraliter dicta, ad populum, quando singulariter, ad ludam. hic quoque possumus dicere, quando pluraliter dicta, ad sanctos, quando singulariter, ad dominum nostrum Iesum Christum referri, quia aestimari potest et pro pluribus in propheta locutus et ipse pro se, et ideo dixerit: uerecundia mea contra me est, quae dicitur ἐντροπή.

In the hundred and eighth psalm one part seems to refer to the people of the Jews, another to Judas the traitor; when things are said in the plural, to the people; when in the singular, to Judas. Here too we can say that when things are said in the plural they refer to the saints, when in the singular to our Lord Jesus Christ, because it can be thought that he spoke in the prophet both for many and for himself; and therefore he said: “My shame is before me”, which is called entropē.

43.69.4CSEL 64:311

ἐντροπή autem est, quando uerecundiam uult aliquis incutere alicui, ut inflectat propositum suum, sicut est: descendat nunc de cruce et credimus ei. confidit in deo, liberet nunc eum. pulchre autem ait tota die, quia incarnatio domini nostri Iesu Christi lucem attulit mundo. dies itaque incarnationis est, de quo idem dicit dominus: ambulate dum lucem habetis et: Abraham diem meum uidit. ergo haec uerecundia habet in se confusionem, unde et Symmachus: tota die, inquit, confusio mea contra me est.

Entropē is when someone wishes to strike shame into another, to bend his purpose, as in: “Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe him. He trusted in God; let him deliver him now.” Beautifully he says “all the day”, because the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ brought light to the world. So it is the day of the incarnation, of which the same Lord says: “Walk while you have the light”, and: “Abraham saw my day.” So this shame has confusion in it, and hence Symmachus too says: “All the day my confusion is before me.”

43.69.5CSEL 64:311

quae autem confusio Christi nisi crux, quod nudus pependit mea? et bene tota die, quia ex quo affixus est cruci usque in horam nonam tenebrae factae sunt et post horam nonam lux refulsit usque in uesperum. hic dies ex tribus primus. potest tamen et chorus sanctorum pluraliter de se et singulariter loqui. chorus enim quasi singularem personam habet, sed numerus plurimorum est, sicut illud est: populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me.

And what is the confusion of Christ but the cross, that he hung naked? And well “all the day”, because from the time he was fixed to the cross until the ninth hour there was darkness, and after the ninth hour light shone until evening. This day is the first of the three. Yet the choir of the saints too can speak of itself in the plural and in the singular. For a choir has as it were a single person, but it is a number of many, as in that: “This people honours me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.”

Explanation 43, chapter 70

43.70.1CSEL 64:311–312

Quae autem est confusio quae operuit dominum Iesum, cum confusionem peccata faciant — ipsa sunt enim quae operiunt peccatorem —, hic autem peccatum non fecerit? sed quemadmodum est confusio adducens peccatum, ita est confusio quae peccatum abolet, ut confusio crucis domini nostri Iesu Christi, per quam peccata mundantur. est etiam omnis confusio bona, quam pro Christi nomine subeas, et admodum gloriosa, si uerbi gratia in persecutione lex sit, ut uerberetur christianus, ut dignitatem amittat, ut careat priuilegio, ut in uincla ducatur.

But what is the confusion that covered the Lord Jesus, since sins cause confusion — for they are what cover the sinner — but he did no sin? But just as there is a confusion that brings on sin, so there is a confusion that abolishes sin, such as the confusion of the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which sins are cleansed. Every confusion too is good which you undergo for the name of Christ, and very glorious, if, for example, in persecution there is a law that a Christian is to be flogged, lose his rank, lack his privilege, be led into chains.

43.70.2CSEL 64:312

haec utique confusio, etsi priuilegium non habet, habet gloriam piae confessionis. est autem et Christi confusio, sicut ipse ait: qui me confusus fuerit coram hominibus, confundam et ego eum coram patre meo qui est in caelis. bona ergo confusio; plerisque tamen huiusmodi confusio Christi amara est, hoc est non credentibus, iocunda credentibus.

This confusion, though it has no privilege, has the glory of a pious confession. There is also confusion about Christ, as he himself says: “He who is ashamed of me before men, I too will be ashamed of him before my Father who is in heaven.” So the confusion is good; yet to very many such confusion over Christ is bitter, that is, to unbelievers, but pleasant to believers.

Explanation 43, chapter 71

43.71.1CSEL 64:312

Siue ergo uelis confusionem Christi intellegere in crucem eius, quae Iudaeis uidebatur esse confusio, qui insultabant ei, quasi erubesceret Christus in eo opere in quo publicam operabatur salutem, siue etiam hanc confusionem, quae ingeri uidebatur a uoce exprobrantis et obloquentis, a facie inimici et persequentis. erubescebat enim sic lapsum esse electum populum suum et confundebatur in eos apud patrem, quorum finis aduenerat. praesens enim erat filio pater, a quo numquam potest filius separari, et ideo audiebat dicentem Iudaeis: ecce relinquetur uobis domus uestra deserta.

So, whether you wish to understand the confusion of Christ as his cross, which seemed a confusion to the Jews who insulted him, as though Christ blushed in that work in which he was working the salvation of all; or also this confusion which seemed to be inflicted “by the voice of the one who reproaches and reviles, by the face of the enemy and persecutor”: for he blushed that his chosen people had fallen so, and he was confounded at them before the Father, whose end had come. For the Father was present with the Son, from whom the Son can never be separated, and therefore he heard him saying to the Jews: “See, your house will be left to you desolate.”

Explanation 43, chapter 72

43.72.1CSEL 64:312–313

Sunt autem etiam qui in confusione sua gloriantur, sicut illi de quibus dicit apostolus, quia gloria eorum in confusione ipsorum. quibus contraria est gloria Christi, qui crucem suscepit nec confusionem refugit, quam nos quoque minime timere debemus nec formidine aut fastidio declinare, ne peccatum supra nos adducat quae potest adducere gratiam uitae. est enim et confusionis gloria, ut si in multos gentiles incidas uel philosophos et illi tibi obiciant crucem Christi et uerbo respondere non possis nec quisquam audiat salutaria uerba referentem.

But there are also those who glory in their confusion, like those of whom the apostle says that their glory is in their shame. Contrary to them is the glory of Christ, who took up the cross and did not shrink from confusion, which we too ought not to fear at all nor avoid from dread or disdain, lest the thing that can bring the grace of life bring sin upon us. For there is also a glory in confusion: as if you fall among many gentiles or philosophers and they cast the cross of Christ up at you, and you cannot answer them with a word, and no one listens to you as you speak saving words.

43.72.2CSEL 64:313

est confusio, sed a uoce exprobrantis et obloquentis, a facie inimici et persequentis. et ideo noli respondere insipienti ad insipientiam eius; esto sicut homo mutus et tacens et quasi non audiens uerba insultantium et obloquentium, non quo respondere non queas, sed quo respondere non debeas. omni enim rei tempus, tempus tacendi et tempus loquendi. tacendum est, quando paratum non inuenis auditorem, loquendum est, quando dominus linguam eruditionis indulget, ut sermo tuus operetur in affectibus audientium.

It is a confusion, but “from the voice of the one who reproaches and reviles, from the face of the enemy and persecutor.” And therefore do not answer a fool according to his folly; be like a man who is dumb and silent and as though not hearing the words of those who insult and revile, not because you cannot answer but because you ought not to answer. For there is a time for everything, a time to keep silence and a time to speak. One must keep silence when one does not find a ready hearer; one must speak when the Lord grants a tongue of instruction, so that your word may work in the affections of the hearers.

43.72.3CSEL 64:313

quomodo autem te audiat, qui ideo tibi obloquitur, eo quod salubrem tuum nolit audire sermonem, aut quomodo tibi adquiescat, qui persecutor est et uelit te sibi uindicare aut, ut Aquilas dixit uel Symmachus, ut ulciscatur et puniat in te, quod Christi hereditas ad gentes uideatur esse transfusa? longe itaque ista confusio a confusione et obprobrio peccatoris. istius enim conscientia inluminatur, qui oblitus non est dei sui, illorum confunditur, quorum ingenium caligat atque perturbat recordatio delictorum.

For how will he hear you who reviles you because he does not wish to hear your saving word; or how will he agree with you who is a persecutor and wishes to take vengeance on you, or, as Aquila or Symmachus said, to avenge himself and punish in you the fact that the inheritance of Christ seems to have passed over to the gentiles? Far, then, is this confusion from the confusion and reproach of the sinner. For the conscience of this one, who has not forgotten his God, is enlightened; that of those is confounded, whose minds the remembrance of their offences darkens and disturbs.

Explanation 43, chapter 73

43.73.1CSEL 64:313

Et ideo bene sibi conscii dicunt: haec omnia uenerunt super nos et obliti non sumus te et inique non egimus in testamento tuo; et non recessit retro cor nostrum et declinasti semitas nostras de uia tua. uidetur uersiculus ultimus non concordare superioribus. nam quomodo declinarunt hi, quibus diuinitatis nulla obrepsit obliuio nec alicuius iniquitatis conscientia nec ulla desidia?

And therefore, well aware of themselves, they say: “All these things have come upon us, and we have not forgotten you, and we have not acted unjustly in your covenant; and our heart has not turned back, and you have turned aside our paths from your way.” The last verse seems not to agree with the preceding ones. For how did those turn aside on whom no forgetfulness of God crept, no consciousness of any iniquity, no sloth?

43.73.2CSEL 64:313–314

sed si consideres, quia iustus uix saluus fit, intellegis profecto et ipsius nonnumquam titubare uestigia et auctorem declinationis eorum deum uideri, quia ipse quoque patitur iustos saepe temptari, quo magis probentur temptationibus eruditi. quis autem est

But if you consider that the righteous man is scarcely saved, you understand that even his footsteps sometimes stagger, and that God seems to be the author of their turning aside, because he too allows the righteous to be tempted often, so that, trained by temptations, they may be the more proved. And who is

43.73.3CSEL 64:314

tam fortis, ut nequaquam in temptatione moueatur, nisi dominus ei adiutor adsistat? denique conturbatus est et ipse propheta Dauid, quia dixit in sua abundantia: non mouebor in aeternum. aut quis est ille, quem locus afflictationis et terrae corruptela non moueat, cum diuina sententia neminem exceperit qui sit ab exercitio et a fatigatione terrae huius immunis, cui dictum est: maledicta terra in omnibus operibus tuis?

so strong that he is in no way moved in temptation, unless the Lord stands by him as helper? Finally, the prophet David himself was troubled, because he said in his abundance: “I shall not be moved for ever.” Or who is there whom the place of affliction and the corruption of the earth does not move, since the divine sentence excepted no one from being free of the toil and weariness of this earth, to which it was said: “Cursed is the earth in all your works;

43.73.4CSEL 64:314

spinas, inquit, et tribulos germinabit. denique ipse Paulus, dominicae uas electionis, a maledictione ueteris sententiae absolutus domini Iesu passione tamen captiuum se duci in lege peccati uehementissime deplorauit nec quemquam nisi Christum a quo liberaretur inuenit, cum eum lex sui corporis et umbra mortis urgeret.

thorns,” it says, “and thistles it will bring forth.” Finally, Paul himself, the Lord’s chosen vessel, freed from the curse of the old sentence by the passion of the Lord Jesus, yet most vehemently lamented that he was led captive in the law of sin, and found no one but Christ to free him, when the law of his body and the shadow of death pressed upon him.

Explanation 43, chapter 74

43.74.1CSEL 64:314

Diximus sensum. sed expressius, qui locus sit afflictationis, considerare nos conuenit, utrum hic mundus, qui in maligno positus est, an uero caro nostra, in qua anima nostra humiliatur, dum in istius carnis descendit societatem, an aduersa, quibus exercemur

We have given the sense. But it is fitting for us to consider more expressly what the place of affliction is: whether this world, which is set in the evil one, or our flesh, in which our soul is humbled when it comes down into the fellowship of this flesh, or the adversities by which we are exercised

43.74.2CSEL 64:314

in hoc corpore constituti, in quo ingemescimus grauati, quod nolumus spoliari, sed superuestiri. grauis enim labor est, dum expectamus, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita hoc quo nos expoliare debemus; minore enim labore expoliatur quam absorbetur. et uide, ne ea diuersitas sit expoliantis se et expectantis, ut absorbeatur a uita: expoliat gratia, absorbet paenitentia;

while set in this body, in which we groan, being burdened, because we do not wish to be stripped but to be clothed over. For it is a heavy labour while we wait for what is mortal to be swallowed up by life, which we ought to strip off; for it is stripped off with less labour than it is swallowed up. And see whether this is not the difference between one who strips himself and one who waits to be swallowed up by life: grace strips, repentance swallows up;

43.74.3CSEL 64:314–315

expoliat sublimitas mentis, absorbet diligentia. quomodo autem dubites, quod afflictationis hic locus sit, quando corpus est mortis, in quo operit nos etiam umbra mortis? et ideo ad lucernam illam semper debemus intendere, quae est uerbum dei, ut sciamus, quemadmodum nostri animi semitas dirigamus et uestigia mentis interna, ut lux animorum soluat tenebras corporales.

loftiness of mind strips, diligence swallows up. And how can you doubt that this is the place of affliction, since it is the body of death, in which the shadow of death too covers us? And therefore we ought always to look to that lamp which is the word of God, so that we may know how to direct the paths of our soul and the inner footsteps of the mind, so that the light of souls may dissolve the darkness of the body.

Explanation 43, chapter 75

43.75.1CSEL 64:315

Pulchre autem et Aquilae interpretatio, quemadmodum intellegere debeamus locum afflictationis, expressit dicendo: quoniam humiliasti nos in loco sirenum, ut non caro in uitio sit siue natura, sed ea quae carnem corruptibilem esse fecerunt. denique sirenas, quarum secundo et tertio mentionem fecit scriptura diuina, quasdam puellas gentilis tradidit historia, quae uocis propriae suauitate canendo inlecebris prouocabant audiendi studio nauigantes ad litus admouere nauigium; eosque, cum gratiam uocis secuntur, scopuloso in loco incidisse naufragium uetus historia posteris tradidit.

Aquila’s rendering too beautifully expressed how we ought to understand the place of affliction, saying: “For you have humbled us in the place of the sirens”, so that it is not the flesh or nature that is at fault, but the things that made the flesh corruptible. Finally, the sirens, of which divine Scripture makes mention a second and third time, gentile story has handed down to be certain maidens who by the sweetness of their own voice in singing enticed sailors, by the desire to hear, to bring their ship to the shore; and ancient story has handed down to later generations that, when they followed the charm of the voice, they suffered shipwreck in a rocky place.

43.75.2CSEL 64:315

earum autem interpretatio haec est: uoluptas uocis et quaedam adulatio. ita ergo saeculi uoluptas nos quadam carnali adulatione delectat, ut decipiat. ut ergo illic non litus in uitio erat, sed canora dulcedo, quae faciebat asperitatem litoris non caueri, ita non caro in uitio, sed ea quibus caro ista sollicitatur et fluctuat. denique mare, cum tempestas desit, quietum est, si procella saeuiat, periculosum.

Their interpretation is this: pleasure of the voice and a kind of flattery. So, then, the pleasure of the world delights us with a kind of carnal flattery, so as to deceive. So, just as there the shore was not at fault, but the melodious sweetness which made men not beware of the roughness of the shore, so the flesh is not at fault, but the things by which this flesh is solicited and tossed. Finally, the sea, when there is no storm, is calm; if a gale rages, it is dangerous.

Explanation 43, chapter 76

43.76.1CSEL 64:315–316

Et Septuaginta uirorum uidetur cum his sententia conuenire, cum dicunt [quia scriptum est]: quoniam humiliasti nos s. cuius interpretationis testimonia de scripturis nobis sunt arcessenda diuinis. ait enim in Deuteronomio: si exieris, inquit, in pugnam aduersus inimicos tuos et tradiderit tibi eos dominus deus tuus in manus tuas et depraedatus fueris spolia eorum et uideris in ea depraedatione mulierem bonam specie et cohabitaueris cum ea, et infra:

And the view of the Seventy seems to agree with these, when they say: “For you have humbled us …” Testimonies to this interpretation must be brought for us from the divine Scriptures. For he says in Deuteronomy: “If you go out to battle against your enemies, and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands, and you take their spoils, and in that plundering you see a woman of good appearance and live with her”; and below:

43.76.2CSEL 64:316

si nolueris eam postea, dimittes eam liberam, quia humiliasti eam. uides ergo, quoniam non natura sui eam, sed is, qui ei integritatem pudoris eripuit, humiliasse perhibetur. humilitas ergo operis est, per quod caro ista peccati corpus effecta est et locus afflictationis. iterum alibi: si desponsata fuerit uirgo uiro et inueniens eam homo in ciuitate dormierit cum ea, educentur ambo ad portam ciuitatis suae et lapidabuntur et morietur iuuencula, quia non exclamauit in ciuitate nec inuocauit hominem qui subueniret, et uir, inquit, quia humiliauit mulierem proximi sui.

“If afterwards you do not want her, you shall let her go free, because you have humbled her.” You see, then, that it is not her own nature but he who took from her the integrity of her modesty who is said to have humbled her. So the humiliation is of the deed, by which this flesh has become a body of sin and a place of affliction. Again elsewhere: “If a virgin is betrothed to a man, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her, both shall be brought out to the gate of their city and shall be stoned; and the girl shall die because she did not cry out in the city nor call a man to help her, and the man,” it says, “because he humbled his neighbour’s wife.”

43.76.3CSEL 64:316

et hic eadem est huius causa sermonis, ut a corruptore humiliata dicatur. tertium quoque habes de hac re testimonium et plura, si quaeras. tamen de eodem libro audi: siquis inuenerit uirginem quae non sit desponsata et uim faciens ei dormierit cum ea et inuentus fuerit, dabit qui dormiuit cum ea patri iuuenculae quinquaginta denarios et erit uxor eius, quia humiliauit eam; nec poterit dimittere eam per omne tempus, propter quod humiliauit eam. ipse sermo repetitus est, ut intellegas, quia non condicio carnis uideatur nos humiliare, sed culpa.

And here the reason for this word is the same: that she is said to be humbled by the one who corrupted her. You have a third testimony on this matter too, and more if you seek them. Yet hear from the same book: “If anyone finds a virgin who is not betrothed and, using force on her, lies with her and is found, the one who lay with her shall give the girl’s father fifty denarii, and she shall be his wife, because he humbled her; nor shall he be able to put her away all his life, because he humbled her.” The same word is repeated so that you may understand that it is not the condition of the flesh but guilt that seems to humble us.

Explanation 43, chapter 77

43.77.1CSEL 64:316–317

Nec tamen negare possumus, quod multis humilietur et caro, loco ipso, inlecebris ipsis, fragilitate quoque qua patuit errori. quae licet non a mediocri aduersario serpente decepta sit, habebat tamen sui non mediocrem gratiam, antequam peccatum inreperet: in conspectu erat dei Adam, in paradiso uigebat, caelesti gratia refulgebat, loquebatur cum deo. num eum humiliatum ante legisti nisi posteaquam praeuaricatio eum humiliauit sua?

Yet we cannot deny that for many the flesh too is humbled, by the place itself, by the enticements themselves, and also by the frailty by which it lay open to error. Though it was deceived by no ordinary adversary, the serpent, yet before sin crept in it had no ordinary grace of its own: Adam was in the sight of God, he flourished in paradise, he shone with heavenly grace, he spoke with God. Have you read that he was humbled before his own transgression humbled him?

43.77.2CSEL 64:317

cuius uitii hereditatem ad nos utique transmisit, ut in hoc corpore constituti nolimus peregrinari de corpore et adesse deo. et ideo humiliamus animam nostram, quae se ad deum gestit attollere; sed corruptibile corpus grauat animam terrenaque habitacula praeponderant, ut mens deuota deo frequenter inclinetur nec se subicere deo possit, quoniam subiectionem sui sapientia carnis ignorat, quae nostrum inuoluit affectum.

He certainly passed on to us the inheritance of this fault, so that, set in this body, we do not wish to be away from the body and present with God. And therefore we humble our soul, which longs to lift itself up to God; but the corruptible body weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling outweighs it, so that the mind devoted to God is often bent down and cannot submit itself to God, since the wisdom of the flesh, which wraps round our affection, does not know how to submit itself.

Explanation 43, chapter 78

43.78.1CSEL 64:317

Dicentes haec de nobis quid de carne domini nostri Iesu Christi dicimus? qui utique suscepit carnis istius ueritatem et ideo semet ipsum humiliauit usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. diligenter adtende et considera singula. uide quia uolens suscepit hanc formam corporis nostri et tuae obsequia seruitutis, in similitudinem hominum factus, non in similitudinem carnis, sed in similitudinem hominum peccatorum; omnis enim homo sub peccato.

Saying these things about ourselves, what do we say of the flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ? He certainly took on the reality of this flesh, and therefore humbled himself to death, even death on a cross. Attend carefully and consider each point. See that he willingly took on this form of our body and the obedience of your servitude, made in the likeness of men, not in the likeness of flesh, but in the likeness of sinful men; for every man is under sin.

43.78.2CSEL 64:317–318

ideo et specie inuentus ut homo — ut scriptum est de eo: et homo est, et quis cognoscet eum? homo secundum carnem, sed ultra hominem secundum operationem —, ut homo, inquit, humiliauit semet ipsum, quia ad eos deus uenit qui humiliati fuerant liberandos. ipse se ergo humiliauit propter nos. non ergo corpus illius corpus mortis, siquidem corpus est uitae, nec caro illius umbra mortis, siquidem fulgor est gloriae, nec in quo locus afflictationis, siquidem in illo corpore omnibus gratia

Therefore he was also found in appearance as a man — as it is written of him: “And he is a man, and who will know him?”: man according to the flesh, but beyond man according to his working —; as a man, it says, he humbled himself, because God came to free those who had been humbled. So he humbled himself for our sake. So his body is not a body of death, since it is a body of life; nor is his flesh the shadow of death, since it is the brightness of glory; nor is there in it a place of affliction, since in that body there is for all the grace

43.78.3CSEL 64:318

consolationis. humiliauit se, ut disceres quid sit humilitas. denique audi dicentem: discite a me, quia mitis sum et humilis corde. ille se humiliauit, ut tu exaltareris; qui enim se humiliat exaltabitur. sed non omnes qui humiliantur exaltabuntur; multos enim crimen humiliat ad ruinam. humiliatus autem dominus usque ad mortem est, ut de portis mortis exaltaretur.

of consolation. He humbled himself, so that you might learn what humility is. Finally, hear him saying: “Learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart.” He humbled himself, so that you might be exalted; for he who humbles himself will be exalted. But not all who are humbled will be exalted; for crime humbles many to ruin. But the Lord was humbled to death, so as to be exalted from the gates of death.

Explanation 43, chapter 79

43.79.1CSEL 64:318

Ecce uide gratiam Christi, uide beneficia eius. posteaquam Christus aduenit, haec caro quae erat umbra mortis coepit per gratiam domini refulgere et habere lumen proprium, unde et dictum est: lucerna corporis tui est oculus tuus. sed uide de quo oculo dicat: non de exteriore, sed de interiore. si oculus, inquit,

See, then, the grace of Christ, see his benefits. After Christ came, this flesh, which was the shadow of death, began by the grace of the Lord to shine and to have its own light; hence it was also said: “The lamp of your body is your eye.” But see of what eye he speaks: not of the outer but of the inner. “If your eye,” he says,

43.79.2CSEL 64:318

tuus simplex fuerit, totum corpus tuum lucidum erit. interior utique est oculus qui totum hominis corpus inluminat, interior est etiam oculus qui affert toto corpori caecitatem, quia scriptum est: si autem nequam fuerit oculus tuus, totum corpus tuum tenebrosum erit. uides in uno homine, ut, unde tenebrae nascuntur, inde lumen oriatur.

“is single, your whole body will be full of light.” Certainly it is the inner eye that lights the whole body of a man; it is also the inner eye that brings blindness to the whole body, because it is written: “But if your eye is evil, your whole body will be dark.” You see that in one man light rises from the same place where darkness is born.

43.79.3CSEL 64:318

ipse tibi ergo es caligo uel lumen, caligo iniquitatis et tenebrae peccatorum, lumen innocentiae. ipse tibi ergo es uel iniuriae auctor uel gratiae; operatio diuina nil errat. lumen in te ipso est, quia innocentia infantia tua est, pura mens hominis ante adulescentiae lubricum et iuuentutis errorem. tu tibi ergo tenebras fecisti esse quod lumen est. denique idem oculus, hoc est sensus hominis tenebrosus est in peccatore, splendidus in innocente.

So you yourself are your darkness or your light: the darkness of iniquity and the darkness of sins, the light of innocence. You yourself are the author either of injury or of grace for yourself; the divine work does not err. The light is in you yourself, because innocence is your infancy, the pure mind of man before the slipperiness of adolescence and the error of youth. So you have made what is light into darkness for yourself. Finally the same eye, that is, the sense of man, is dark in the sinner, bright in the innocent.

Explanation 43, chapter 80

43.80.1CSEL 64:318–319

Nec illud praetereamus quod Symmachus ait: afflixisti nos in loco deserto. ideo affligimur, quia interdum destituimur protectione caelesti et regio ista sub maledicto est uel in lubrico saeculari. necdum quoque benedixerat terram suam dominus noster Iesus Christus et ideo laborabant nec ad lumen pietatis eius oculorum spiritalium intendebatur obtutus. deinde quia uoluptas et delectatio mundi frequenter inrepit.

Nor let us pass over what Symmachus says: “You have afflicted us in a desert place.” We are afflicted because at times we are deprived of heavenly protection, and this region is under a curse or in the slipperiness of the world. Our Lord Jesus Christ had not yet blessed his earth, and therefore they toiled, and the gaze of spiritual eyes was not directed to the light of his mercy. Then, too, because the pleasure and delight of the world often creep in.

43.80.2CSEL 64:319

unde non uinculis hominis illius ligare nos atque uincire debemus nec cera aures claudere, sed auertere aurem, quotienscumque aliena a fide et contraria uel aduersa utilitati nostrae aliquis existimat obloquenda, ne in eo sermone operiat umbra nos mortis. et si quid tale profertur, nos tamen dei uerbum debemus inserere, quod mentis nostrae oculos fulgore disputationis inluminet.

Hence we ought not to bind and tie ourselves with the bonds of that man, nor stop our ears with wax, but turn our ear away whenever someone thinks things should be said that are foreign to the faith and contrary or opposed to our benefit, lest in that talk the shadow of death cover us. And if anything such is put forward, we ought nevertheless to put in the word of God, to light up the eyes of our mind with the brightness of its discussion.

Explanation 43, chapter 81

43.81.1CSEL 64:319

Sequitur: si obliti sumus nomen dei nostri et si expandimus manus nostras ad deos alienos, nonne deus requiret ista? — Aquilas: inuestigabit ista? Symmachus: inueniet ista? — ipse enim nouit occulta cordis. quia propter te morte afficimur tota die, aestimati sumus ut oues occisionis. quid est quod ait requiret deus? quasi, si non requirat, ignoret, et sic requiret deus obliuionem tuam quae inrepsit, ut auferat eius omne uestigium. unde et Aquilas dixit: inuestigabit.

There follows: “If we have forgotten the name of our God and if we have stretched out our hands to strange gods, will not God require this?” — Aquila: “will search this out?”; Symmachus: “will find this?” — “for he knows the secrets of the heart. For your sake we are put to death all the day; we are counted as sheep for slaughter.” What does he mean, “God will require”? As though, if he did not require it, he would not know; and so God will require your forgetfulness which has crept in, so as to take away every trace of it. Hence Aquila too said: “will search out”.

43.81.2CSEL 64:319

nam utique qui nouit cordis occulta quomodo quaerit, cui etiam ea quae sunt interiora manifesta sunt siquidem apud deum conscientia uniuscuiusque se prodit et cogitatio hominis apud eum se aut condemnat aut purgat. denique Aquilas uisiones cordis dixit, eo quod uideat cor nostrum et omnis nostri cogitatio cordis in promptu sit apud deum atque ei cogitationum nostrarum imago resplendeat. bene illud ait Aquilas: in te morte afficimur, quoniam in Christo mori gloriosum et in ipso moritur, qui pro eius nomine sacra passione est coronatus.

For how does he who knows the secrets of the heart seek, to whom even what is within is plain? For before God each one’s conscience betrays itself, and a man’s thought either condemns or clears itself before him. Finally Aquila said “visions of the heart”, because he sees our heart and every thought of our heart is open before God and the image of our thoughts shines back to him. Aquila said that well: “In you we are put to death”, since it is glorious to die in Christ, and he dies in him who has been crowned with sacred suffering for his name.

43.81.3CSEL 64:319–320

sed quid miraris, quod requirentem deum occulta cordis uersiculus iste declaret, cum alibi deum scrutatorem legeris cordis? quid etiam miraris, si uerbis nostris maiestas diuinae substantiae explicari non possit, cum ait apostolus: nolite ante tempus quid iudicare, donec ueniat dominus, qui inluminabit occulta tenebrarum et manifestabit consilia cordium; et tunc laus erit unicuique a deo?

But why are you surprised that this verse declares that God requires the secrets of the heart, when you read elsewhere that God is the searcher of the heart? Why are you surprised, too, if the majesty of the divine substance cannot be explained by our words, when the apostle says: “Do not judge anything before the time, until the Lord comes, who will light up the hidden things of darkness and make manifest the counsels of hearts; and then each one will have praise from God”?

43.81.4CSEL 64:320

tenebras cordis saepe loco criminis legimus, immo prope ubique. uide ergo, ne ista sint occulta tenebrarum quae sunt cordis occulta, ideoque tenebrarum nomen acceperint, quod ea ab aliis non deprehendantur, sed lateant. et ideo dominus in die iudicii inluminaturus asseritur occulta tenebrarum, quia cor uniuscuiusque manifestabitur quod ante occultum erat, soli quidem Christo cognitum, qui sciens iudicii sui gratiam ait: nihil est occultum quod non manifestabitur.

We often read of the darkness of the heart in place of crime, indeed almost everywhere. See, then, whether the hidden things of darkness are not the secrets of the heart, and have received the name of darkness because they are not detected by others but lie hidden. And therefore the Lord is asserted to be going to light up the hidden things of darkness on the day of judgment, because each one’s heart will be made manifest which before was hidden, known indeed to Christ alone, who, knowing the grace of his judgment, says: “Nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest.”

Explanation 43, chapter 82

43.82.1CSEL 64:320

Sunt autem multa quae propter uerecundiam premimus et, ut impleamus caeleste mandatum, tacito apud nos tenemus affectu, ne uideamur in his quae nostra sunt gloriari et eorum fructum uulgando incipiamus amittere. sunt autem occulta sapientiae, quae raptus in paradiso apostolus Paulus audiuit et, quia non licebat ea homini loqui, apud se tegebat, non quia usum eorum aut gratiam aliis inuideret, sed, quod non licebat homini loqui, forte etiam

But there are many things which we suppress out of modesty and, to fulfil the heavenly command, keep to ourselves with silent affection, lest we seem to glory in what is ours and, by publishing them, begin to lose their fruit. And there are the hidden things of wisdom, which the apostle Paul, caught up into paradise, heard, and, because it was not lawful for a man to speak them, kept them to himself, not because he begrudged others their use or grace, but because what it was not lawful for a man to speak perhaps also

43.82.2CSEL 64:320–321

homini audire non proderat, quae tunc inluminabit dominus, cum inluminandorum secretorum tempus aduenerit. uide ne etiam in euangelio distantiam aliquam repperias, ubi dixit: nihil occultum quod non manifestabitur neque opertum quod non reuelabitur. illud tamen adstipulatur ad superiorem interpretationem, ut utrumque de bonis esse credamus, quia scriptum est: cognoscit dominus qui sunt ipsius. suos ergo cognoscit et eos cognoscit qui cognoscunt deum, ignorat autem eos qui ignorant deum; qui enim ignorat, ignorabitur. dominus ergo quae bona sunt recognoscit; ea quae sunt plena cognitionis diuinae, ea quae sunt occulta sapientiae nouit dominus, auersatur autem ea quae sunt plena iniquitatis atque peccati.

did not profit a man to hear; these the Lord will light up when the time has come for the secrets to be lit up. See whether you may not also find some difference in the gospel, where he said: “Nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest, nor covered that will not be revealed.” Yet this supports the earlier interpretation, that we should believe both refer to good things, because it is written: “The Lord knows those who are his.” So he knows his own, and knows those who know God, but does not know those who do not know God; for he who does not know will not be known. So the Lord recognizes the things that are good; the things full of divine knowledge, the hidden things of wisdom, the Lord knows; but he turns away from the things full of iniquity and sin.

Explanation 43, chapter 83

43.83.1CSEL 64:321

Denique si istorum personam consideres, quos nulla diuini cultus obliuio separauit, ut alieno deo expanderent suas manus, atque aperire suas animas noluerunt, intelleges, quod in occultis suis non flagitia aliqua erant, sed ea quae essent innocentiae continebant, quandoquidem morte afficiebantur pro dei cultu, tota quoque die uersabantur in morte, sicut uersabatur Paulus, qui ait: cotidie morior per uestram gloriam.

Finally, if you consider the person of those whom no forgetfulness of divine worship separated so that they stretched out their hands to a strange god, and who did not wish to open their souls, you will understand that in their hidden things there were no crimes, but they held things that belonged to innocence, since they were put to death for the worship of God, and all the day too they were engaged with death, as Paul was engaged, who says: “I die daily, by your glory.”

43.83.2CSEL 64:321

et uere cotidie Paulus moriebatur secundum carnem in ieiuniis, in naufragiis, in diuersis periculis, in miseriis constitutus, sed non totus moriebatur. moriebatur homo eius exterior, sed renouabatur interior et ideo non deficiebat, cum tot periculis urgeretur, quia, etsi exterior homo eius corrumpebatur, interior renouabatur de die in diem, quia diem sibi uniuscuiusque fides et gratia operationis inluminat.

And truly Paul died daily according to the flesh, set in fastings, in shipwrecks, in various dangers, in miseries; but he did not die wholly. His outer man was dying, but the inner was being renewed, and therefore he did not fail, though pressed by so many dangers, because, even if his outer man was being corrupted, the inner was being renewed day by day, because faith and the grace of working light up the day for each one.

43.83.3CSEL 64:321

unde nec Paulus apostolus noctem sciebat, quia qui renouatur semper in luce est. an tibi non uidetur in luce qui Christi in se continet caritatem? et ideo immolationis securus dura non refugit nec eum persecutio ulla aut fames aut gladius potest a Christo domino separare, quem uincula diuinae caritatis adstringunt.

Hence the apostle Paul did not know night, because he who is being renewed is always in the light. Or does he not seem to you to be in the light who holds within himself the love of Christ? And therefore, secure in his sacrifice, he does not flee hard things, nor can any persecution or famine or sword separate from Christ the Lord the one whom the bonds of divine love bind.

Explanation 43, chapter 84

43.84.1CSEL 64:321–322

Interim tamen etiam in bonis operibus mens humana turbatur et temptationibus quatitur. tamen et hoc iustorum est, ut, cum se temptari uiderint, adiumentum deposcant, sicut apostoli in euangelio, cum Christus dormiret in naue, tempestatem fluctuum formidantes excitauerunt dominum Iesum, ut ab his formidinem propulsaret. nonne tibi uidentur sancti apostoli istos dixisse uersiculos: exurge; quare obdormis, domine? exurge et ne repellas usque in finem?

Meanwhile, however, even in good works the human mind is troubled and shaken by temptations. Yet this too belongs to the righteous: that when they see themselves tempted, they ask for help, as the apostles did in the gospel when, Christ sleeping in the boat, they feared the storm of the waves and woke the Lord Jesus, so that he might drive the fear from them. Do not the holy apostles seem to you to have said these verses: “Rise up; why do you sleep, O Lord? Rise up, and do not cast us off to the end”?

43.84.2CSEL 64:322

certe, etsi littera distare uideatur, concordat sententia. neque uero uel in corpore constitutus ita dormiebat dominus noster Iesus Christus, ut ignoraret tempestatem maris et exorta procella uentorum cognitionem eius per altitudinem soporis excederet. dormiebat corpore, sed uirtute uigilabat. et dispositio illa fuit, ut ascenderet in nauem dei filius dei uerbum, ascenderent etiam simul discipuli sui, quos remissos et

Certainly, even if the letter seems to differ, the meaning agrees. Nor, even when set in the body, did our Lord Jesus Christ sleep in such a way as not to know of the storm of the sea, or that, when a gale of winds arose, the depth of sleep went beyond his knowledge. He slept in body, but kept watch in power. And the arrangement was this: that the Son of God, the Word of God, should go up into the boat, and his disciples should go up with him, whom, not allowing them to be slack and

43.84.3CSEL 64:322

neglegentes esse non passus, quasi de domini praesentia et fauore securos, somno corporis sese composuit. ergo illa specie somni dormire se mundo huic apostolis uerbum dei demonstrabat. uigilabat tamen eius potestas prouidentiaque, quae excitauit tempestatem in mari, ut nauis propemodum insurgentibus fluctibus operiretur, qua discipuli tempestate turbati utrum salubris consilii se prouisione fulcirent an uero remedium excederent cognosceretur. sed illis, quibus Iesus non dormiebat, uigilabat fides et ideo surgentes excitauerunt dominum Iesum dicentes: domine, salua nos, perimus.

negligent, as though secure in the Lord’s presence and favour, he settled himself in bodily sleep. So by that appearance of sleep the Word of God showed the apostles that he was asleep to this world. Yet his power and providence were watching, which stirred up the storm in the sea, so that the boat was almost covered by the rising waves, so that it might be known whether the disciples, troubled by the storm, would support themselves with the provision of sound counsel or would go beyond the remedy. But for those for whom Jesus was not asleep, faith was awake, and therefore they rose and woke the Lord Jesus, saying: “Lord, save us, we are perishing.”

Explanation 43, chapter 85

43.85.1CSEL 64:322

Uide si etiam illud discrepat ab euangelio quod de Iona legimus, qui dormiebat in uentre nauis et stertebat, in quo sacrae passionis figura praecessit. sicut enim Ionas dormiebat in naui et stertebat securus quasi non metuens deprehendi, ita dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui figuram illam sacramento suae mortis impleuit, tempore euangelii in naue dormiuit, et sicut ille tribus diebus et tribus noctibus fuit in uentre ceti, ita filius hominis tribus diebus et tribus noctibus fuit in corde terrae in sui corporis passione.

See whether what we read of Jonah also differs from the gospel, who slept in the belly of the ship and snored, in whom a figure of the sacred passion went before. For as Jonah slept in the ship and snored securely, as though not fearing to be found out, so our Lord Jesus Christ, who fulfilled that figure by the mystery of his death, slept in a boat at the time of the gospel; and as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so the Son of Man was three days and three nights in the heart of the earth in the passion of his body.

43.85.2CSEL 64:322–323

qui ubi se excitauit a morte et somnum sui corporis relaxauit, ut pro salute resurgeret uniuersorum, discipulos uisitauit. hic est ergo uerus Ionas, qui obtulit animam suam redemptionem pro nobis. propterea ergo sublatus et missus est in mare, ut exciperetur et deuoraretur a ceto, quo intra aluum ceti positus eius interiora uacuaret. de quo ceto hoc dictum sit, audi Iob dicentem:

When he roused himself from death and released the sleep of his body, so as to rise for the salvation of all, he visited his disciples. This, then, is the true Jonah, who offered his soul as a ransom for us. Therefore he was taken up and thrown into the sea, so as to be received and swallowed by the whale, so that, set within the whale’s belly, he might empty its insides. Of what whale this was said, hear Job saying:

43.85.3CSEL 64:323

qui habet, inquit, magnum cetum captiuum reddere. quis iste est, utique cognoscis, cum legeris, quod dominus noster Iesus Christus captiuam duxerit captiuitatem; deuicto enim aduersario et inimico nos, qui captiui eramus, coepimus libertatem possidere per Christum.

“He who has,” he says, “to make the great whale captive.” Who this is you surely recognize, when you read that our Lord Jesus Christ led captivity captive; for, the adversary and enemy having been conquered, we who were captives began to possess freedom through Christ.

Explanation 43, chapter 86

43.86.1CSEL 64:323

Denique ipsa oratio sancti Ionae docet dominicae passionis esse mysteria: et dixit: clamaui, inquit, ad dominum deum meum in tribulatione mea et audiuit me de uentre inferni. uides quia inferni uentrem dixit, non ceti. dominus autem non in cetum, sed in infernum descendit, ut et illi qui in infernis erant a perpetuis uinculis soluerentur. denique plerique etiam resurrexerunt.

Finally, the very prayer of holy Jonah teaches that these are mysteries of the Lord’s passion: “And he said: I cried,” he says, “to the Lord my God in my tribulation, and he heard me from the belly of hell.” You see that he said the belly of hell, not of the whale. And the Lord went down not into the whale but into hell, so that those too who were in hell might be loosed from everlasting chains. Finally, very many even rose again.

43.86.2CSEL 64:323

quae autem flumina circumdederunt Ionam aut de qua abysso dixit Ionas: abyssus circumdedit me nouissima, mersit caput meum in fissuras montium, descendi in terram cuius serae sunt continentes aeternales? utique hoc ad personam Ionae non quadrat et conuenit.

And what rivers surrounded Jonah, or of what abyss did Jonah say: “The deepest abyss surrounded me, it sank my head into the clefts of the mountains, I went down into the land whose bars are everlasting holds”? Certainly this does not square and fit with the person of Jonah.

43.86.3CSEL 64:323

filius autem dei descendit in fissuras montium, quando descendit in tumulum. ipsum enim Ioseph, sicut euangelium docet, posuit in monumento suo nouo, quod excidit in petra, et aduoluit saxum magnum ad ostium monumenti. denique et in alio libro: posuit, inquit, eum in monumento exciso, in quo nondum quisquam positus erat.

But the Son of God went down into the clefts of the mountains when he went down into the tomb. For Joseph, as the gospel teaches, laid him in his new tomb, which he had hewn in the rock, and rolled a great stone to the door of the tomb. Finally in another book too: “He laid him,” it says, “in a hewn tomb, in which no one had yet been laid.”

Explanation 43, chapter 87

43.87.1CSEL 64:323–324

Quis autem est, qui cum uoce laudis et confessionis domini sacrificauit nisi princeps omnium sacerdotum et uota pro omnibus uouit et reddidit? solus enim effectus sui habuit potestatem. sicut ergo Ionas missus est in mare et quieuit mare a commotione sua, ita dominus noster Iesus Christus uenit in hunc mundum, ut

And who is it who sacrificed with the voice of praise and of confession of the Lord but the chief of all priests, who also vowed vows for all and paid them? For he alone had the power to carry out what he vowed. As, then, Jonah was thrown into the sea and the sea ceased from its raging, so our Lord Jesus Christ came into this world, so as to

43.87.2CSEL 64:324

mundum lucri faceret et sanguine suo omnia pacificaret siue terrena siue caelestia. aduentu igitur suo redemit uniuersos homines et prouocauit ad dei cultum operibus suis; cum mortuos resuscitaret, sanaret infirmos, timorem dei humanis infudit affectibus. ipse est qui sacrificauit domino sacrificium salutare pro nobis et dignas conuersionis nostrae hostias deo obtulit; ipse est qui dormiuit et euigilauit.

win the world and make peace by his blood for all things, whether on earth or in heaven. By his coming, then, he redeemed all men and called them to the worship of God by his works; when he raised the dead and healed the sick, he poured the fear of God into human affections. He is the one who sacrificed to the Lord a saving sacrifice for us and offered to God the worthy victims of our conversion; he is the one who slept and awoke.

Explanation 43, chapter 88

43.88.1CSEL 64:324

Cauendum est ergo, ne obdormiat peccatoribus; obdormire enim uidetur his quibus non resurrexerit et quos in finem reppulit. quis autem est qui repellitur nisi qui peregrinatur a domino, quia non peregrinatur a corpore? quomodo enim possunt deo placere qui in carne sunt? et ideo non in carne simus, sed spiritu adhaereamus domino Iesu, qui se in octogesimo et octauo psalmo repulsum dicit pro nobis: tu uero reppulisti pro nihilo, distulisti christum tuum;

We must beware, then, lest he sleep for sinners; for he seems to sleep for those for whom he has not risen and whom he has cast off to the end. And who is it who is cast off but he who is away from the Lord, because he is not away from the body? For how can those who are in the flesh please God? And therefore let us not be in the flesh, but cling in spirit to the Lord Jesus, who in the eighty-eighth psalm says that he was cast off for us: “But you have cast off for nothing, you have put off your anointed;

43.88.2CSEL 64:324

euertisti testamentum serui tui. itaque repulsus pro nobis factus est in obprobrium uicinis suis; ille enim suscepit obprobrium crucis, ut nos gloriam suae resurrectionis indueret. repulsus uidetur quasi mortuus et perfusus confusione quasi crucifixus, sed benedictus est in aeternum qui maledictionem sustulit, benedictionis gratiam comparauit.

you have overturned the covenant of your servant.” So, cast off for us, he became a reproach to his neighbours; for he took on the reproach of the cross, so as to clothe us with the glory of his resurrection. He seems cast off as one dead and covered with confusion as one crucified, but he is blessed for ever who took away the curse and won the grace of blessing.

Explanation 43, chapter 89

43.89.1CSEL 64:324–325

Sequitur: quare faciem tuam auertis? auertere a nobis deum faciem suam putamus, quando sumus in aliquibus afflictionibus constituti, ut tenebrae nostro offundantur affectui, quibus impediti fulgorem ueritatis oculis nostris haurire nequeamus. etenim si in nostrum deus attendat ingenium et nostram mentem uisitare dignetur, certi sumus, quod nulla res nobis caliginem possit obducere.

There follows: “Why do you turn away your face?” We think God turns his face away from us when we are set in some afflictions, so that darkness is poured over our affection, hindered by which we cannot draw in with our eyes the brightness of truth. For if God attends to our mind and deigns to visit our soul, we are sure that nothing can draw darkness over us.

43.89.2CSEL 64:325

etenim si uultus hominis ceteris membrorum partibus plus refulget et quemcumque intuemur uel incognitum agnoscimus uel cognitum recognoscimus, quem aspectus noster latere non patitur, quanto magis dei uultus quem spectat inluminat! de quo, ut cetera eius sunt, ita et hoc praeclarum sancti apostoli qui uere interpres est Christi, ut aptiore eum sensu et sermone nostris infunderet mentibus.

For if a man’s face shines more than the other parts of the members, and whoever we look at we either come to know if unknown or recognize if known, our sight not allowing him to be hidden, how much more does the face of God light up the one whom it looks upon! Of this, as of the rest, the holy apostle, who is truly the interpreter of Christ, gave a splendid account, so as to pour it into our minds with more fitting sense and speech.

43.89.3CSEL 64:325

unde ait: quoniam deus, qui dixit de tenebris lumen splendescere, inluxit in cordibus nostris ad inluminationem scientiae claritatis domini in facie Christi Iesu. ubi igitur in nobis reluceat Christus, audiuimus. est enim fulgor aeternus animorum, quem ideo pater misit in terras, ut in eius inluminati uultu aeterna et caelestia spectare possemus, qui ante terrena caligine tenebamur.

Hence he says: “For God, who said that light should shine out of darkness, has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of the Lord in the face of Christ Jesus.” Where, then, Christ shines in us, we have heard. For he is the eternal brightness of souls, whom the Father sent to earth for this reason, that, lit up in his face, we might be able to look on eternal and heavenly things, we who before were held in earthly darkness.

43.89.4CSEL 64:325

quid de Christo loquar, cum etiam Petrus apostolus dixerit ad illum claudum ex utero matris suae: respice in nos? qui respexit in Petrum et fidei inluminatus est gratia; neque enim accepisset remedium sanitatis, nisi fideliter credidisset.

What shall I say of Christ, when even the apostle Peter said to that man lame from his mother’s womb: “Look at us”? He looked at Peter and was lit up by the grace of faith; for he would not have received the remedy of health if he had not faithfully believed.

43.89.5CSEL 64:325

unde, cum tanta gloria esset in apostolis, audiens transire dominum Iesum Zachaeus ascendit in arborem, quia exiguus et pusillus in turba eum uidere non poterat. uidit Christum et lumen inuenit, uidit eum et qui ante aliena rapiebat sua contulit. merito ergo dicunt isti: quare faciem tuam auertis?

Hence, since there was such glory in the apostles, Zacchaeus, hearing that the Lord Jesus was passing by, climbed a tree, because, small and short, he could not see him in the crowd. He saw Christ and found light; he saw him, and he who before had seized what belonged to others gave away his own. Rightly, then, do these say: “Why do you turn away your face?”

Explanation 43, chapter 90

43.90.1CSEL 64:325–326

Aut fortasse propterea dicitur, quia desiderantibus Christi moram faciebat aduentus; ipse enim est uultus patris qui est imago et gloria dei. certe si non ad incarnationis eius hoc accipimus sacramentum, recte etiam illud usurpant sancti dicentes: quare faciem tuam auertis?, hoc est: etsi auertis, domine, faciem tuam a nobis, tamen signatum est in nobis lumen

Or perhaps it is said because Christ’s coming was delaying for those who longed for it; for he himself is the face of the Father, who is the image and glory of God. Certainly, if we do not take this of the mystery of his incarnation, the saints also rightly use it, saying: “Why do you turn away your face?”, that is: even if you turn away your face from us, Lord, yet the light

43.90.2CSEL 64:326

uultus tui, domine. tenemus illud in cordibus nostris et in intimo splendet affectu; neque enim quisquam potest subsistere, si tu auertas faciem tuam. omnia enim a te expectant, ut tu des illis cibum in tempore; dante te his colligent, aperiente te manum tuam uniuersa implebuntur bonitate. auertente autem te faciem turbabuntur. auferes spiritum eorum et deficient et in puluerem suum conuertentur. emittes spiritum tuum et creabuntur, et renouabis faciem terrae.

of your face is sealed upon us, Lord. We hold it in our hearts, and it shines in our inmost affection; for no one can stand if you turn away your face. For all things look to you, that you may give them food in due season; when you give it to them, they will gather it; when you open your hand, all things will be filled with goodness. But when you turn away your face, they will be troubled. You will take away their spirit and they will fail and return to their dust. You will send forth your Spirit and they will be created, and you will renew the face of the earth.

43.90.3CSEL 64:326

agnoscis quae sit esca, quam deus hominibus subministrat? ipse est cibus quem secundum uoluntatem patris unigenitus filius eius dominus noster epulatur, sicut ipse ait: meus cibus est ut faciam uoluntatem patris mei qui in caelis est. hic cibus nobis est salutaris et omnia dei sunt salutaria.

Do you recognize what the food is that God supplies to men? It is the food which, according to the will of the Father, his only-begotten Son our Lord feasts on, as he himself says: “My food is to do the will of my Father who is in heaven.” This food is saving for us, and all the things of God are saving.

Explanation 43, chapter 91

43.91.1CSEL 64:326–327

Audis quaedam dei membra; cognosce uirtutes: manus quippe eius plenitudo bonitatis est, facies eius inluminatio mentis est. et ideo semper ab eo speremus, in ipsum uota nostra et omnia studia dirigamus nec desperemus, etsi corporaliter eum uidere non possumus. neque enim desperauit Moyses, cui dictum est: non potes uidere faciem meam; non enim uidebit faciem meam homo et uiuet, et addidit: ecce locus apud me, stabis in petra; et cum transierit gloria mea, ponam te in cauernam petrae et operiam te manu mea, donec transeam; et tollam manum meam et uidebis posteriora mea, faciem autem meam uidere non poteris. non ergo uidetur ab homine facies dei. est tamen locus in quo fide se monstret homini deus. est hic locus apud deum et ideo si steterimus in petra, id est in carnis istius conscientia et fidei firmitate, etsi plenitudinem eius uidere non possumus, tamen quantum possumus quasi reliquias eius luminis hauriemus. neque enim Moyses totam diuinitatis eius plenitudinem uidit quae habitat in Christo corporaliter, sed uidit posteriora Christi, uidit splendorem eius ut homo, uidit eius gloriam passionis per quam regnum nobis caeleste reserauit.

You hear of certain members of God; recognize the powers: his hand is the fullness of goodness, his face is the enlightening of the mind. And therefore let us always hope from him, let us direct to him our prayers and all our efforts, and let us not despair, even if we cannot see him bodily. For Moses did not despair, to whom it was said: “You cannot see my face; for no man shall see my face and live”; and he added: “See, there is a place by me; you shall stand on the rock; and when my glory passes by, I will put you in a cleft of the rock and cover you with my hand until I pass; and I will take away my hand and you will see my back, but my face you will not be able to see.” So the face of God is not seen by man. Yet there is a place in which God shows himself to man by faith. This place is by God, and therefore if we stand on the rock, that is, in the conscience of this flesh and the firmness of faith, even if we cannot see his fullness, yet as far as we can we shall draw in, as it were, the remains of his light. For Moses did not see the whole fullness of his Godhead which dwells in Christ bodily, but he saw the back of Christ, he saw his brightness as a man, he saw the glory of his passion, through which he opened the heavenly kingdom to us.

Explanation 43, chapter 92

43.92.1CSEL 64:327

Aquilas autem quare faciem tuam abscondis? posuit, sed etiam ceteri, quod uidetur conuenire cum Moysi dictis, qui ait: demonstra te mihi, quasi diceret: noli uultum tuum mihi abscondere, sed magis demonstra uidere cupienti.

But Aquila put: “Why do you hide your face?”, and so did the others; this seems to agree with the words of Moses, who says: “Show yourself to me”, as though he said: Do not hide your face from me, but rather show it to one who longs to see.

Explanation 43, chapter 93

43.93.1CSEL 64:327

Et addidit: obliuisceris, inquit, inopiam nostram et tribulationem nostram? de qua inopia dicit sanctus propheta, quod in obliuionem uenerit dei, aut quae est ista inopia, quam excidisse deo nostro et domino conqueratur? non otiosa est inopia nisi forte ea, quae protectorem deum et remuneratorem habere consueuerit.

And he added: “Do you forget,” he says, “our poverty and our tribulation?” Of what poverty does the holy prophet say that it has come into God’s forgetfulness, or what is this poverty which he complains has slipped from our God and Lord? Poverty is not idle unless perhaps it is the kind that is accustomed to have God as protector and rewarder.

43.93.2CSEL 64:327

si enim est inopia cui patet regnum caelorum, recte isti inopiam suam diuinis excidisse sensibus arbitrabantur, qui animam suam humiliatam in puluerem deplorabant et uentrem suum in terra haerere dicebant; qui autem in terra haerent, uidentur diuina benedictione priuari. quae sit ergo ista inopia, audi: beati enim pauperes spiritu, ipsorum enim est regnum caelorum.

For if there is a poverty to which the kingdom of heaven lies open, these rightly thought that their poverty had slipped from the divine mind, who lamented their soul humbled into the dust and said their belly cleaved to the earth; and those who cleave to the earth seem to be deprived of the divine blessing. What this poverty is, then, hear: “For blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

43.93.3CSEL 64:327

si ergo beata paupertas est cui patet caelum, terrenas istas diuitias neglegamus, corporalem redundantiam declinemus. sequamur gesta apostolorum, ante quorum pedes unusquisque quod habebat pecuniae ex suorum agrorum pretio conferebat, ut pauperibus dispensaretur.

If, then, blessed is the poverty to which heaven lies open, let us neglect these earthly riches and avoid bodily abundance. Let us follow the acts of the apostles, before whose feet each one laid whatever money he had from the price of his fields, to be distributed to the poor.

43.93.4CSEL 64:327–328

istam ergo inopiam euangelicam hi sancti uiri multo ante exercere coeperant et ideo dicebant: obliuisceris inopiam nostram? tale est hoc quale illud apostolicum: ecce nos reliquimus omnia et secuti sumus te. bona ergo paupertas quae a pietate procedit et uirtutum exercitatione suscipitur.

So these holy men began long before to practise this gospel poverty, and therefore they said: “Do you forget our poverty?” This is like that apostolic saying: “See, we have left everything and followed you.” Good, then, is the poverty which proceeds from piety and is taken up in the exercise of virtues.

Explanation 43, chapter 94

43.94.1CSEL 64:328

Nec solum inopiam, sed etiam tribulationem suam in obliuionem deo uenisse deplorant. bonae sunt et tribulationes quae sunt propriae iustorum, qui non pro meritis suis, sed pro pietate eas sustinent, in quibus iustus non atteritur, sed dilatatur, sicut sanctus propheta declarat dicens: in tribulatione dilatasti mihi, et ipse dominus Iesus ait: in tribulatione in-

And they lament that not only their poverty but also their tribulation has come into God’s forgetfulness. Good too are the tribulations that are proper to the righteous, who endure them not for their merits but for piety, in which the righteous man is not crushed but enlarged, as the holy prophet declares, saying: “In tribulation you have enlarged me”; and the Lord Jesus himself says: “In tribulation I

43.94.2CSEL 64:328

uocaui dominum et exaudiuit me in latitudinem. dilatauit sancto apostolo Paulo, quando ei oculorum lumen eripuit; ita enim confessus est Christum quem negabat antea. ideo uas electionis esse promeruit. denique ut scias, quia dilatauit Paulo dominus Iesus, audi ipsum apostolum dicentem: os nostrum patet ad uos o Corinthii, cor nostrum dilatatum est. aperi ergo os, confitere Christum, quia plenitudo est; ubi plenitudo, ibi etiam latitudo. et quasi bonus magister, qui discipulos habere optaret aequales, nos quoque hortatus est ut dilataremur, dicens: dilatamini et uos.

called on the Lord, and he heard me in a broad place.” He enlarged the holy apostle Paul when he took from him the light of his eyes; for so he confessed Christ, whom before he denied. Therefore he was found worthy to be a chosen vessel. Finally, so that you may know that the Lord Jesus enlarged Paul, hear the apostle himself saying: “Our mouth is open to you, O Corinthians, our heart is enlarged.” Open, then, your mouth, confess Christ, because he is fullness; where there is fullness, there is also breadth. And like a good teacher who wished to have disciples equal to himself, he urged us too to be enlarged, saying: “Be enlarged, you too.”

Explanation 43, chapter 95

43.95.1CSEL 64:328

Cum autem deus alicubi in tribulatione dilatat, tunc fiet latitudo cordis sicut harena maris innumerabilis. quae sit ista latitudo, audi dicentem sanctum Salomonem, ut acciperet sapientiam a deo. non diuitias, non nobilitatem, non potestatem, sed sapientiam postulauit et in illa omnia quae.

And when God somewhere enlarges in tribulation, then there will be breadth of heart like the sand of the sea, innumerable. What this breadth is, hear from holy Solomon, so that he might receive wisdom from God. Not riches, not nobility, not power, but wisdom he asked for, and in it all the things which

43.95.2CSEL 64:328–329

etiam non postulauit inuenit. unde scriptura dicit, quia talis erat latitudo cordis eius sicut harena maris innumerabilis. unde hanc percipias latitudinem, ait de se ipso cognoscens: in latitudine cordis tui describe eam. et ideo qui habet sapientiam non in occulto teneat eam, non ad momentum, sed canat eam in exitu, ubique quod sentit cum auctoritate praedicet.

he had not asked for he also found. Hence Scripture says that the breadth of his heart was like the sand of the sea, innumerable. That you may receive this breadth, he says, knowing it from himself: “In the breadth of your heart write it.” And therefore he who has wisdom should not keep it hidden, nor for a moment, but sing it at the going out, and everywhere proclaim with authority what he thinks.

Explanation 43, chapter 96

43.96.1CSEL 64:329

Symmachus autem pro tribulatione afflictationem posuit. siue tamen afflictio sit siue tribulatio, opus est ut nos maneamus in domino nec ab eodem recedamus, quoniam praesule domino et assistente nobis omne certamen fortiter possumus sustinere. si autem dominum neglegamus et longe nos faciamus a domino, facimus nobis aduersarium fortiorem.

Symmachus, however, put “affliction” for “tribulation”. But whether it be affliction or tribulation, we need to remain in the Lord and not withdraw from him, since with the Lord as our guardian and standing by us we can endure every contest bravely. But if we neglect the Lord and put ourselves far from the Lord, we make our adversary stronger.

Explanation 45, chapter 1

45.1.1CSEL 64:329

Titulus psalmi huius ita inscribitur: In finem; pro filiis Core, pro occultis psalmus ipsi Dauid. quid est pro occultis? occultorum habuisse se cognitionem per reuelationem domini Iesu in quinquagesimo quoque psalmo sanctus propheta commemorat dicens: incerta et occulta sapientiae tuae manifestasti mihi. quae autem illa sint occulta, in euangelio sancto docemur dicente dei filio, quod mysteria sapientiae abscondita sint sapientibus et paruulis reuelata.

The title of this psalm is written thus: “To the end; for the sons of Korah, for the hidden things; a psalm to David himself.” What is “for the hidden things”? In the fiftieth psalm too the holy prophet recalls that he had knowledge of hidden things through the revelation of the Lord Jesus, saying: “The uncertain and hidden things of your wisdom you have made known to me.” And what those hidden things are we are taught in the holy gospel, the Son of God saying that the mysteries of wisdom are hidden from the wise and revealed to little ones.

45.1.2CSEL 64:329–330

haec sunt illa, ni fallor, quae oculus non uidit nec auris audiuit nec in cor hominis ascenderunt, quae praeparauit dominus diligentibus eum. ergo in occulto cordis nostri occulta sapientiae recondamus, non temere aliquibus diuulgemus nisi sacramentorum consortibus, quos dominus uocauit ad gratiam suam, qui se in abscondito uult rogari, quoniam solus est qui abscondita et occulta cognoscat.

These, if I am not mistaken, are those things which eye has not seen nor ear heard, nor have they entered into the heart of man, which the Lord has prepared for those who love him. So let us store up the hidden things of wisdom in the hidden place of our heart, and not rashly publish them to any except those who share the sacraments, whom the Lord has called to his grace, who wishes to be asked in secret, since he alone knows hidden and secret things.

Explanation 45, chapter 2

45.2.1CSEL 64:330

Denique ipse dominus Iesus ad percipiendam legem solum Moysen, non absque Iesu tamen, in montem uoluit ascendere, in euangelio quoque Petro, Iohanni et Iacobo solis ex omni numero discipulorum resurrectionis suae gloriam reuelauit. ita occultum suum uoluit esse mysterium et ammonebat frequenter, ne cui facile quae uiderant annuntiarent, ne offendiculum quisquam subiret in-

Finally, the Lord Jesus himself willed that Moses alone, yet not without Jesus, should go up the mountain to receive the law; in the gospel too he revealed the glory of his resurrection to Peter, John and James alone of the whole number of the disciples. So he willed his mystery to be hidden, and often warned them not to tell anyone readily what they had seen, lest anyone weaker should meet a stumbling block,

45.2.2CSEL 64:330

firmior, qui uim sacramentorum fluctuanti ingenio haurire non posset. denique ipse Petrus nesciebat quid diceret, qui tria tabernacula domino et seruulis crederet esse facienda. deinde fulgorem gloriae domini transfigurantis se sustinere non potuit, in terram cecidit; ceciderunt et filii tonitrui Iacobus et Iohannes et nubes operuit eos nec potuerunt surgere nisi posteaquam Iesus uenit et tetigit eos et iussit, ut surgerent et formidinem sequestrarent. introierunt ergo in nubem, ut abdita et occulta cognoscerent, atque ibi audierunt uocem dei dicentis: hic est filius meus dilectus, in quo mihi complacui; ipsum audite.

one who could not take in the force of the sacraments with a wavering mind. Finally, Peter himself did not know what he was saying, who thought three tents should be made for the Lord and his servants. Then he could not bear the brightness of the glory of the Lord transfiguring himself; he fell to the ground; the sons of thunder, James and John, fell too, and the cloud covered them, and they could not rise until Jesus came and touched them and bade them rise and put away fear. So they went into the cloud, so as to know the secret and hidden things, and there they heard the voice of God saying: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear him.”

45.2.3CSEL 64:330

quid est hic est filius meus dilectus? hoc est: noli errare, Simon, ut seruulis dei filium conferendum putes. hic est filius meus; non Moyses filius, non Helias filius, quamuis alter aperuerit mare, alter clauserit caelum. in uerbo enim domini uterque naturam uicit elementi; sed illi ministerium praebuerunt, hic est qui soli-

What is “This is my beloved Son”? That is: Do not err, Simon, in thinking that the Son of God is to be compared with servants. This is my Son; Moses is not my Son, Elijah is not my Son, although the one opened the sea and the other closed the sky. For each by the word of the Lord overcame the nature of an element; but they provided a ministry, while this is the one who made

45.2.4CSEL 64:330–331

dauit aquas, caelum siccitate clausit et quando uoluit in imbres resoluit. ubi testimonium resurrectionis adsciscitur, adstipulentur ministeria seruulorum; ubi gloria domini resurgentis ostenditur, seruulis splendor absconditur. namque ipsos stellarum globos sol exortus obducit et omnia earum lumina mundano sub sole uanescunt. quomodo ergo sub aeterno sole iustitiae atque illo fulgore diuino uideri poterant stellae carnales? ubi ergo sunt illa lumina quae uestris ante oculis quodam miraculo refulgebant? tenebrae sunt uniuersa comparatione lucis aeternae.

the waters solid, closed the sky with drought and, when he willed, loosed it into rain. Where testimony to the resurrection is called in, let the ministries of the servants lend support; where the glory of the risen Lord is shown, the splendour of the servants is hidden. For the rising sun covers even the globes of the stars, and all their lights fade under the sun of this world. How, then, could the fleshly stars be seen under the eternal Sun of righteousness and that divine brightness? Where then are those lights which before shone before your eyes by a kind of miracle? All things are darkness in comparison with the eternal light.

45.2.5CSEL 64:331

alii ministeriis suis deo placere festinent; hic solus est uerum lumen et aeternum, in quo pater complacet uel in quo bene placitum est mihi, ut meum sit quicquid hic fecit et quicquid ego feci filii opus esse iure credatur. ipsum audite dicentem: ego et pater unum sumus. non dixit: ego et Moyses unum sumus, non dixit sibi et Heliae ullum diuinae gloriae esse consortium. quid tria tabernacula praeparatis? non in terris habet iste tabernaculum, sed in caelo. audierunt apostoli et ceciderunt pauore turbati. uenit dominus et leuauit eos et iussit, ne cui dicerent quod uidissent.

Let others hasten to please God by their ministries; this one alone is the true and eternal light, in whom the Father is well pleased, or in whom “it has pleased me well”, so that whatever he has done is mine and whatever I have done is rightly believed to be the Son’s work. Hear him saying: “I and the Father are one.” He did not say: I and Moses are one; he did not say that he and Elijah had any share in divine glory. Why do you prepare three tents? This one has his tent not on earth but in heaven. The apostles heard and fell, troubled with fear. The Lord came and raised them and bade them tell no one what they had seen.

Explanation 45, chapter 3

45.3.1CSEL 64:331

Huic ergo tua occulta seruato, cui Dauid sua occulta mandabat dicens: ab occultis meis munda me, domine; munda enim debent esse receptacula in quibus sunt pietatis occulta mysteria. et ideo tibi dicitur: bibe aquam de tuis uasis et de puteorum tuorum fontibus, et in plateis superfluant aquae tuae, ut inriguo fonte munderis. ideo tibi dicitur:

Keep your hidden things, then, for him to whom David entrusted his hidden things, saying: “From my hidden faults cleanse me, O Lord”; for the vessels in which the hidden mysteries of piety are must be clean. And therefore it is said to you: “Drink water from your own vessels and from the springs of your own wells, and let your waters overflow in the streets”, so that you may be cleansed by a watering spring. Therefore it is said to you:

45.3.2CSEL 64:331

uino torcularia tua redundent, ideo dicitur: in tribulatione inuocasti me et liberaui te et exaudiui te in abscondito tempestatis, probaui te in aqua contradictionis. est enim quaedam in tribulationibus interna pectorum saeua tempestas, quando sunt foris pugnae, intus timores. est aqua contradictionis, quando uelut quodam maritimi sali aestu fluctuant nostrae cogitationes nec ulla in profundo mentium definitionis stabilitate placidantur.

“Let your winepresses overflow with wine”; therefore it is said: “In tribulation you called on me and I delivered you, and I heard you in the hidden place of the storm; I proved you at the water of contradiction.” For there is in tribulations a certain fierce inward storm of the heart, when there are fightings without, fears within. There is the water of contradiction, when our thoughts toss as with the surge of the salt sea and are not calmed by any stability of decision in the depth of the mind.

45.3.3CSEL 64:331–332

tunc tempestas in abscondito, tunc aqua contradictionis, quae solo potest Christi sermone sedari, quo peccata nobis nostra dimittit, secundum quod ipse dignatus est dicere: iam uos mundi estis propter sermonem quem locutus sum uobis. loquere, domine Iesu: uerbum tuum medicina est, uerbum tuum lumen est, uerbum tuum nostrae conluuionis ablutio est, uerbum tuum fons est; tu loqueris et culpa lauatur.

Then there is the storm in the hidden place, then the water of contradiction, which can be calmed only by the word of Christ, by which he forgives us our sins, according to what he deigned to say: “You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.” Speak, Lord Jesus: your word is medicine, your word is light, your word is the washing away of our filth, your word is a spring; you speak, and guilt is washed away.

Explanation 45, chapter 4

45.4.1CSEL 64:332

Et quia de abscondito tempestatis et de aqua contradictionis ductus est sermo, omnia nobis factum est dei uerbum. caro factum est, ut carnem seruaret, aqua factum est, ut aquam contradictionis sua gratia temperaret et amaritudines impietatis auferret. ideoque scriptum est: aqua alta uerbum in corde uiri; alibi uerbum, alibi iterum consilium;

And since the discussion has been led from the hidden place of the storm and from the water of contradiction, the Word of God has become all things for us. He became flesh, to save flesh; he became water, to temper by his grace the water of contradiction and take away the bitterness of impiety. And therefore it is written: “Deep water is the word in the heart of a man”; in one place “word”, in another “counsel”;

45.4.2CSEL 64:332

ibi enim bonum consilium ubi bonum est dei uerbum. et ideo tibi lex dicit: attende tibi, ne fiat tibi uerbum malum in corde tuo, et dicat Iesus: quid cogitat mala in cordibus uestris? misit enim deus uerbum suum, ut sanaret hominem, non ut perderet. hoc uerbum medicina, non poena est. hoc uerbum in corde tuo et in ore sit tuo, hoc uerbum sit in occultis, ubi diabolus insidiatur; intret uerbum, exeat diabolus. nam si inrepserit

for there is good counsel where the word of God is good. And therefore the law says to you: “Take heed to yourself, lest an evil word arise in your heart”; and Jesus says: “Why do you think evil in your hearts?” For God sent his word to heal man, not to destroy him. This word is medicine, not punishment. Let this word be in your heart and in your mouth, let this word be in the hidden places where the devil lies in wait; let the word enter, let the devil go out. For if the devil has crept in,

45.4.3CSEL 64:332

diabolus, Christus recedit, quomodo recessit a Iuda, postquam se diabolus in cor eius inmersit, et tu ergo dic: ab occultis meis munda, domine, ne diabolus insidietur in occultis, sicut leo in cubili suo. quodsi Christi occulta pie fideliterque seruaueris, insidiandi diabolo locus esse non poterit. ideoque in psalmo nono Dauid de occultis scribens domini sacramentis, quod est conuersio peccatorum, uocatio gentium, dei regnum, praeparatio cordis, iudicium pauperum, refectio inopum, ante de occultis pectoris tui

Christ withdraws, as he withdrew from Judas after the devil plunged himself into his heart. So you too say: “From my hidden faults cleanse me, O Lord”, so that the devil may not lie in wait in the hidden places, like a lion in his den. But if you keep the hidden things of Christ piously and faithfully, there can be no place for the devil to lie in wait. And therefore in the ninth psalm David, writing of the Lord’s hidden sacraments — that is, the conversion of sinners, the calling of the gentiles, the kingdom of God, the preparation of the heart, the judgment of the poor, the refreshment of the needy — first says that the adversary must be driven out of the hidden places of your breast

45.4.4CSEL 64:332–333

atque secretis exterminandum aduersarium dicit, ne sedeat in occultis interficere cupiens innocentem. ideoque tibi dicitur: intra in cubiculum tuum et clauso ostio ora patrem tuum in abscondito. illo tua descendat oratio, ubi eam audiat qui scrutatur abscondita, ibi tuam patientiam deprehendat uel tegendae iniuriae uel iactantiae declinandae; occultat enim sapiens iniuriam suam. ibi est latibulum sapientiae; posuit enim tenebras latibulum suum; quaerent me mali et non inuenient.

and its secrets, lest he sit in hidden places wishing to kill the innocent. And therefore it is said to you: “Go into your room and, shutting the door, pray to your Father in secret.” Let your prayer go down there, where he who searches hidden things may hear it; there let him find your patience, whether in covering an injury or in avoiding boasting; for the wise man hides his injury. There is the hiding place of wisdom; for he made darkness his hiding place; the wicked will seek me and will not find me.

Explanation 45, chapter 5

45.5.1CSEL 64:333

Ideo Abraham puteum fodit, ut aquam qui quaereret inueniret, ideo puteum fodit Isaac, ideo Iesus dominus sedebat ad puteum — erat autem ibi fons Iacob —, sedebat ad puteum, ut quaereres. fons ibi erat tibi Christus. fons est, ut aquae superfluant requirentibus, quo et uniuersa carnis uel flagitia diluantur uel exstinguantur incendia. haec ergo est altitudo sapientiae et scientiae dei, ut mali eam non inueniant, boni quaerant atque in eius adquirendae studio et meditatione uersentur. uis scire quam uerum sit? audi Sapientiae ipsius uerba: petite, et dabitur uobis; quaerite, et inuenietis; pulsate, et aperietur uobis.

That is why Abraham dug a well, so that whoever sought water might find it; that is why Isaac dug a well; that is why the Lord Jesus sat by the well — and Jacob’s spring was there —; he sat by the well so that you might seek. Christ was there a spring for you. He is a spring, so that waters may overflow for those who seek, by which all the sins of the flesh may be washed away or its fires quenched. This, then, is the depth of the wisdom and knowledge of God: that the wicked do not find it, the good seek it and are engaged in the pursuit and meditation of acquiring it. Do you want to know how true this is? Hear the words of Wisdom itself: “Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.”

45.5.2CSEL 64:333

pulsa ergo ianuam, quia Christus est ianua, pulsa ostium uerbi, ut aperiatur tibi ad eloquendum mysterium Christi et absconditos in Christo sapientiae possis inuenire thesauros. in ipso nobis sapientia, in ipso uita nostra abscondita est, sicut Paulus asseruit qui usque ad tertium raptus est caelum, ut audiret ea quae homini non licet loqui. quanta occultorum est disciplina! licet scire homini et non licet loqui. scire uita est, loqui mors est.

Knock, then, at the door, because Christ is the door; knock at the door of the word, that it may be opened to you to speak the mystery of Christ, and you may be able to find the treasures of wisdom hidden in Christ. In him is our wisdom, in him our life is hidden, as Paul asserted, who was caught up to the third heaven to hear things which it is not lawful for a man to speak. How great is the discipline of the hidden things! A man may know and may not speak. To know is life, to speak is death.

Explanation 45, chapter 6

45.6.1CSEL 64:333–334

Cognoscentes ergo, quia finis occultorum, qui Graece σκοπός dicitur, hic est atque ea summa, ut et indigni non apprehendant sapientiae disciplinam et, qui desiderium habent, uitae tamen et fidei meritis suffragantibus, cognitionem diuinorum capere sacramentorum laborant et cotidianis exercitationibus desudant, intentionis suae fructum mereantur adipisci, nonum psalmum et quadragesimum quintum diligentius legamus, ut absconditam in mysterio sapientiam fideli possimus mente conprehendere; soli enim isti de occultis titulum praetulerunt. sed iam psalmum adoriamur.

Knowing, then, that the end of the hidden things, which in Greek is called skopos, is this, and this the sum: that the unworthy may not grasp the discipline of wisdom, and that those who have the desire, supported by the merits of life and faith, who labour to grasp the knowledge of the divine sacraments and toil in daily exercises, may be found worthy to obtain the fruit of their effort — let us read the ninth psalm and the forty-fifth more diligently, so that we may grasp with a faithful mind the wisdom hidden in mystery; for these alone have put “of the hidden things” in their title. But now let us approach the psalm.

Explanation 45, chapter 7

45.7.1CSEL 64:334

Deus noster refugium et uirtus. quid est noster? hoc est: eorum qui in te credimus. sic et alibi: domine, refugium factus es nobis; nobis, inquit, credentibus. non incredulis, nobis quaerentibus, non refugientibus ueritatem. ille enim hoc potest dicere, qui in solius dei praesidio suae constituit spem salutis.

“Our God is refuge and strength.” What is “our”? That is: of us who believe in you. So too elsewhere: “Lord, you have become a refuge for us”; for us, he says, who believe, not for the unbelieving; for us who seek, not who flee the truth. For he can say this who has placed the hope of his salvation in the protection of God alone.

45.7.2CSEL 64:334

nobis ergo refugium factus es et nostrum refugium et uirtus, qui sumus ex populis nationum. Iudaei te negauerunt, Iudaei non receperunt et ideo es conuersus ad gentes, uocasti nos et refugium factus es nostrum et uirtus es nobis. uis scire, quam de nobis qui sumus ex gentibus dictum sit? crux domini Iudaeis offendiculum, Graecis stultitia, nobis autem uirtus dei atque sapientia est, et infra: ex ipso autem uos estis in Christo Iesu, qui factus est sapientia nobis a deo.

So for us you have become a refuge, and our refuge and strength, we who are from the peoples of the nations. The Jews denied you, the Jews did not receive you, and therefore you turned to the gentiles; you called us and became our refuge and are our strength. Do you want to know how it was said of us who are from the gentiles? “The cross of the Lord is to the Jews a stumbling block, to the Greeks foolishness, but to us the power of God and wisdom”; and below: “But from him you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God.”

45.7.3CSEL 64:334

utique Paulus non de Iudaeis nec de gentibus dixit, sed de his qui conuersi ad dominum Iesum suae praedicarent salutis auctorem. confugisti ergo ad Christum: non deseras fundamentum, confirmatorem tuum non derelinquas, ut te qui suscepit ipse tueatur et mercem suam pius animarum nostrarum negotiator agnoscat.

Certainly Paul did not speak of the Jews or of the gentiles, but of those who, converted to the Lord Jesus, proclaimed him the author of their salvation. You have taken refuge, then, in Christ: do not desert the foundation, do not abandon the one who strengthens you, so that he who received you may himself protect you, and the kind merchant of our souls may recognize his merchandise.

Explanation 45, chapter 8

45.8.1CSEL 64:334–335

Adiutor in tribulationibus quae inuenerunt nos nimis. bene nimis ad utrumque respondet, ut et in tribulationibus quae nos nimis inuenerunt et adiutor nimis possit intellegi. quanto enim maiores tribulationes fuerint, tanto maiora nobis et uehementiora adiumenta sunt necessaria. et ideo plerumque fit, ut in grauioribus et asperioribus certaminibus coronemur, quia lacrimis et gemitibus et orationibus frequentioribus aeternae opem nobis diuinitatis adsciscimus.

“A helper in the tribulations that have found us exceedingly.” “Exceedingly” rightly answers to both, so that it can be understood both of the tribulations that found us exceedingly and of the helper exceedingly. For the greater the tribulations, the greater and stronger the help we need. And therefore it often happens that we are crowned in the heavier and harsher contests, because by tears and groans and more frequent prayers we call in to ourselves the help of the eternal Godhead.

Explanation 45, chapter 9

45.9.1CSEL 64:335

Quo fit ut non timeamus, cum terra nostra turbatur et transferuntur montes, quia si tu pro nobis, quis contra nos? timere non possumus fragilitates istius carnis, quae timore ac metu frangitur, inflammatur cupiditatibus, luxuria mollitur, deliciis eneruatur, uaporatur febribus, dolore uexatur, exanimatur angustiis.

So it comes about that we do not fear when our earth is troubled and the mountains are moved, because if you are for us, who is against us? We cannot fear the frailties of this flesh, which is broken by fear and dread, inflamed by desires, softened by luxury, enervated by delights, heated by fevers, troubled by pain, made breathless by distress.

45.9.2CSEL 64:335

uel cum transferuntur illi montes in cor maris, de quibus dixit saluator: si habueritis fidem sicut granum sinapis, non solum de ficulnea facietis, sed etiam si monti huic dixeritis: tollere et iactare in mare, nihil inpossibile erit uobis. misit se hic mons in cor Iudae et mentem eius graui tempestate turbauit diuersarum exagitans fluctibus passionum.

Or when those mountains are carried into the heart of the sea, of which the Saviour said: “If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will do not only what was done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain: Be taken up and cast into the sea, nothing will be impossible to you.” This mountain sent itself into the heart of Judas and troubled his mind with a heavy storm, tossing it with the waves of different passions.

45.9.3CSEL 64:335

sicut enim terrarum fertilitati fecunda bonis operibus et deuotionis ac fidei fructibus anima comparatur, ut odor Iacob sicut odor agri pleni, ita etiam procellosi maris inquietudine figuratur anima eius, qui quietus esse non nouit et amaris cogitationibus excitat graues fluctus. denique nec osculo suo dominus Iesus Iudae proditoris amaritudinem temperauit. suscepit osculum proditor, infudit uenenum, mortem inrogauit, cuius aculeum quidem Christus obtudit, sed solus proditor non euasit.

For just as the soul fruitful in good works and the fruits of devotion and faith is compared to the fertility of the earth, so that the smell of Jacob is like the smell of a full field, so too the soul of one who does not know how to be quiet and stirs up heavy waves with bitter thoughts is figured by the restlessness of the stormy sea. Finally, not even by his own kiss did the Lord Jesus soften the bitterness of Judas the traitor. The traitor received the kiss, poured in poison, brought death, whose sting Christ indeed blunted, but the traitor alone did not escape.

45.9.4CSEL 64:335–336

et ut euidenter montem huiusmodi nobis manifestaret, alibi quoque, cum daemonium ab homine iussisset exire, apostolis interrogantibus, qua causa illud ipsi eicere nequiuissent, ait: non eicitur hoc genus nisi in oratione et ieiunio, et addidit: si habueritis fidem sicut granum sinapis, dicetis huic monti: transi hinc illo, manu significans, quis ille mons esset quem posset perfecta transferre fides. perfecta enim fides grano sinapis comparata est dicente apostolo: si habeam omnem fidem ita ut montes transferam, caritatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest.

And to make such a mountain plain to us, elsewhere too, when he had commanded a demon to go out of a man, and the apostles asked why they could not cast it out, he said: “This kind is not cast out except by prayer and fasting”, and added: “If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: Move from here to there”, pointing with his hand to show what mountain it was that perfect faith could move. For perfect faith is compared to a grain of mustard seed, as the apostle says: “If I have all faith, so as to move mountains, but have not love, it profits me nothing.”

Explanation 45, chapter 10

45.10.1CSEL 64:336

Sunt etiam qui ita distingunt: et transferentur montes, ut sequatur: in cordibus maris sonuerunt et turbatae sunt aquae eius, conturbati sunt montes in fortitudine eius. non bonae aquae, quae sonant atque turbantur, et potum praebere non possunt; meliores sunt quae pertranseunt, sicut scriptum est: inter medios montes pertransibunt aquae et potabunt omnes bestiae agri, suscipient onagri in sitim suam.

There are also those who punctuate thus: “and the mountains will be moved”, so that there follows: “in the hearts of the sea; its waters roared and were troubled; the mountains were troubled by his strength.” Not good are the waters that roar and are troubled and cannot give drink; better are those that pass through, as it is written: “Between the mountains the waters will pass, and all the beasts of the field will drink; the wild asses will take them in their thirst.”

45.10.2CSEL 64:336

denique ubi legio daemoniorum petiit et accepit potestatem, ut introiret in porcos, et magno impetu se praecipitauit in mare et aquae illae gregis sui praecipitatione turbatae sunt. alibi quoque idem Dauid propheta sic posuit: uiderunt te aquae, deus, uiderunt te aquae et timuerunt, hoc est bonae uirtutes, quae uerbi caelestis cognitione sunt placidae, non sonitu et fragore terribiles. de malis autem uirtutibus quid dicit? et conturbatae sunt abyssi;

Finally, when the legion of demons asked and received power to enter the swine, it threw itself with great force into the sea, and those waters were troubled by the plunge of its herd. Elsewhere too the same prophet David put it thus: “The waters saw you, O God, the waters saw you and were afraid”, that is, the good powers, which are calm through knowledge of the heavenly word, not terrible with roar and crash. But what does he say of the evil powers? “And the depths were troubled;

45.10.3CSEL 64:336–337

multitudo sonitus aquarum. abyssi deum non uident et ideo turbationibus semper obnoxiae sunt. et exposuit quid essent abyssi: multitudo, inquit, sonitus aquarum. nam et bestia illa antichristus ex abysso ascendit, ut aduersus Heliam atque Henoch atque Iohannem, qui propter testimonium domini Iesu terris sunt redditi, proeliaretur, ut legimus in Iohannis Apocalypsi. cui datum est os loquendi magna, ut aduersus deum plena furoris conuicia et sacrilegii personaret.

a multitude, the sound of waters.” The depths do not see God, and therefore they are always subject to troubles. And he explained what the depths were: “a multitude,” he says, “the sound of waters.” For that beast too, the Antichrist, ascends from the abyss, to make war against Elijah and Enoch and John, who have been given back to the earth for the testimony of the Lord Jesus, as we read in the Apocalypse of John; to him was given a mouth to speak great things, so as to sound out against God insults full of fury and sacrilege.

Explanation 45, chapter 11

45.11.1CSEL 64:337

Sonuerunt ergo aquae, id est inmundi spiritus, cum turbarentur uidentes opera dei, in domini salutaris aduentu appropinquare sibi iudicium pertimescentes. sonuerunt et turbatae sunt aquae in domini passione. unde et dictum est: quare fremuerunt gentes et populi meditati sunt inania?

So the waters roared, that is, the unclean spirits, when they were troubled seeing the works of God, fearing that judgment was drawing near to them at the coming of the saving Lord. The waters roared and were troubled at the Lord’s passion. Hence it was also said: “Why have the nations raged, and the peoples meditated vain things?”

45.11.2CSEL 64:337

et alibi scriptura dicit: periit memoria eorum cum strepitu. diabolus sonum quaerit, Christus silentium. denique sicut agnus coram tondente se, sic non aperuit os suum, et alibi: non clamabit neque contendet nec quisquam audiet in platea uocem eius, donec eiciat in uictoria iudicium. quae est ista nisi de serpente uictoria?

And elsewhere Scripture says: “Their memory has perished with a crash.” The devil seeks noise, Christ silence. Finally, “like a lamb before its shearer, so he did not open his mouth”; and elsewhere: “He will not cry out nor contend, nor will anyone hear his voice in the street, until he brings forth judgment to victory.” What victory is this but the victory over the serpent?

45.11.3CSEL 64:337

in hac fortitudine filii dei conturbati sunt montes, cum diabolus et ministri eius uiderent mortuos resurgentes. isti sunt montes qui turbantur, illi montes qui transferuntur in paradisum, quibus dicitur: hodie mecum eris in paradiso, et alius, cui dicitur: si uolo eum manere donec ueniam, quid ad te? tu me sequere, et Henoch qui raptus est, ne malitia saeculi mutaretur.

In this strength of the Son of God the mountains were troubled, when the devil and his ministers saw the dead rising. These are the mountains that are troubled; those are the mountains that are carried over into paradise, to whom it is said: “Today you will be with me in paradise”; and another, to whom it is said: “If I will that he remain until I come, what is that to you? Follow me”; and Enoch, who was carried off lest he be changed by the wickedness of the world.

Explanation 45, chapter 12

45.12.1CSEL 64:337–338

Post passionem domini quid aliud sequi debuit, nisi quia de corpore domini flumen exiuit, quando de latere eius aqua fluxit et sanguis, quo laetificauit animas uniuersorum, quia illo flumine lauit peccatum totius mundi? est et fluuius qui de Eden exit et circuit uniuersam terram, uerbum dei quo paradisus intellegibilis inrigatur et omnis anima uocatur ad gratiam Christi dicente ipso dei uerbo: si quis sitit, ueniat ad me et bibat.

After the Lord’s passion what else should follow but that a river went out from the Lord’s body, when water and blood flowed from his side, by which he gladdened the souls of all, because with that river he washed away the sin of the whole world? There is also the river that goes out from Eden and goes round the whole earth: the word of God, by which the spiritual paradise is watered and every soul is called to the grace of Christ, the Word of God himself saying: “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink.

45.12.2CSEL 64:338

cui ego dedero aquam, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. ex illo enim unico uerbo dei quattuor fluuiorum prudentiae et fortitudinis, temperantiae quoque et iustitiae fluenta manarunt. alii enim per spiritum datur sermo sapientiae, alii fides in eodem spiritu, alii gratia curationum in uno spiritu, alii operatio uirtutum. haec enim omnia operatur unus atque idem spiritus, diuidens singulis prout uult. hi sunt impetus fluminis, cum se in gratiam ministeriorum operationis atque uirtutis spontanea diuisione transfundit.

To whom I give water, rivers of living water will flow from his belly.” For from that one Word of God the streams of the four rivers flowed: of prudence and fortitude, of temperance also and justice. For to one through the Spirit is given the word of wisdom, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another the grace of healings in the one Spirit, to another the working of powers. For one and the same Spirit works all these things, dividing to each as he wills. These are the rushings of the river, when it pours itself out by a spontaneous division into the grace of the ministries of working and power.

Explanation 45, chapter 13

45.13.1CSEL 64:338

His igitur fluminis superni meatibus ciuitas illa in qua deus inhabitat inrigatur et sanctificatur altissimi tabernaculum, omnis anima quae inhabitatur a Christo uel corpus illud quod uirgo generauit, de quo Gabriel angelus dixit: et quod nascetur ex te sanctum uocabitur filius dei uiui. bonum tabernaculum, quod nulla potuerunt obumbrare peccata, admirabile templum dei et aula caelestis, quod solutum corrumpi

By these courses of the heavenly river, then, that city in which God dwells is watered, and the tabernacle of the Most High is sanctified: every soul that is inhabited by Christ, or that body which the Virgin bore, of which the angel Gabriel said: “And what will be born of you will be called holy, the Son of the living God.” A good tabernacle, which no sins could overshadow, a wonderful temple of God and heavenly court, which, though dissolved, could not be corrupted,

45.13.2CSEL 64:338

non potuit, sed intra triduum resurrexit resuscitatum ab ipso qui mortuus uidebatur. nec mirum, quando deus in medio ciuitatis eius erat nec commotus est, siue quia nullius peccati prolapsione commotus est dei filius nec alicuius erroris offensione titubauit aut corporalis inlecebrae nutauit inpulsu, siue quia non reliquit animam eius dei gratia, sed inseparabilis in ea mansit, quod ab omni conluuione delicti inmaculata durauerit. unde et ad patrem dei filius dixit:

but rose within three days, raised by him who seemed to be dead. No wonder, since God was in the midst of his city and he was not moved, whether because the Son of God was not moved by the slip of any sin nor staggered at the stumbling of any error nor wavered at the impulse of bodily enticement, or because the grace of God did not leave his soul but remained inseparably in it, because it remained spotless from every filth of offence. Hence the Son of God also said to the Father:

45.13.3CSEL 64:338–339

nec derelinques animam meam in inferno. ergo quia suberat ei nec in carne peccare, diuine ait: ego in patre et pater in me est, et alibi: traditus sum et non egrediebar. ab eo utique non egrediebatur, cui dixit postea: exsurrexi, et adhuc tecum sum. ubi autem aliquis grauius peccat, commouetur in eo deus, ut ab eo transeat. unde et Adae peccanti deambulare uisus est et Stephano stare, quia ille in praeuaricatione lapsus est, hic in martyrio coronatus.

“You will not leave my soul in hell.” So, since it lay in his power not to sin even in the flesh, he says divinely: “I am in the Father and the Father is in me”; and elsewhere: “I was delivered up and did not go out.” Certainly he did not go out from him to whom he said afterwards: “I arose, and I am still with you.” But where someone sins more gravely, God is moved in him, so as to pass away from him. Hence he was seen walking for Adam when he sinned, and standing for Stephen, because the one fell in transgression, the other was crowned in martyrdom.

45.13.4CSEL 64:339

et in Zachariae libro ita scriptum est: ambulabit in commotione comminationis irae suae dominus. simile et in euangelio dictum est Iudaeis: ecce derelinquetur uobis domus uestra deserta; dereliquit enim dominus Iudaeos et statim secuta est ruina synagogam. quodsi eam Christus non deseruisset, numquam eam supremum secutum esset excidium. aperuimus ergo quod dictum est: deus in medio eius, non commouebitur.

And in the book of Zechariah it is written thus: “The Lord will walk in the commotion of the threatening of his anger.” Something like it was said in the gospel to the Jews: “See, your house will be left to you desolate”; for the Lord left the Jews, and at once ruin followed the synagogue. But if Christ had not deserted it, final destruction would never have followed it. So we have explained what was said: “God is in the midst of her; she will not be moved.”

Explanation 45, chapter 14

45.14.1CSEL 64:339

Sequitur: adiuuabit eam deus diluculo, quo significatur, quia resurrectio matutina adiumentorum nobis caelestium subsidia confert, quae noctem reppulit, diem refudit dicente scriptura surge qui dormis et exurge a mortuis, inlucescet tibi Christus. uide autem mysterium. uespere passus est Christus; ideo et secundum legem ad uesperam agnus occiditur. mane resurrexit; sic enim scriptum est: una autem sabbati uenit Maria Magdalene prima luce ad monumentum, cum adhuc esset obscurum, et uidit lapidem amotum ab ostio.

There follows: “God will help her at daybreak”, by which it is signified that the morning resurrection brings us the support of heavenly help, which drove back the night and poured back the day, Scripture saying: “Rise, you who sleep, and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.” See the mystery. Christ suffered in the evening; therefore according to the law too the lamb is slain toward evening. He rose in the morning; for so it is written: “On the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came at first light to the tomb, while it was still dark, and saw the stone taken away from the door.”

45.14.2CSEL 64:339–340

ad uesperam mundi occiditur deficiente iam luce, quia in tenebris erat hic totus mundus et maioribus fuisset tenebrarum squaloribus inuolutus, nisi Christus nobis e caelo lux aeterna uenisset innocentiae tempora generi refusurus humano. passus est ergo dominus Iesus et sanguine suo nostra peccata donauit, lux refulsit conscientiae purioris et dies resplenduit gratiae spiritalis;

He is slain at the evening of the world, when the light was already failing, because this whole world was in darkness and would have been wrapped in the greater squalor of darkness, had not Christ come to us from heaven as eternal light, to pour back the times of innocence to the human race. So the Lord Jesus suffered and by his blood forgave our sins; the light of a purer conscience shone, and the day of spiritual grace gleamed;

45.14.3CSEL 64:340

unde et apostolus ait: nox praecessit, dies appropinquauit. euigilauimus igitur, iam non dormiamus; uestem lucis induimus, non in amictus tenebrosae conuersationis atque exuuias reuertamur; comessationibus atque deliciis, quae nocturni sunt temporis, uale diximus, sobrietatem elegimus, cuius gratia Iacob primatus quos non habebat inuenit.

hence the apostle too says: “The night is far gone, the day is at hand.” We have awakened, then; let us no longer sleep. We have put on the garment of light; let us not return to the cloaks and cast-off clothes of a dark way of life. We have said farewell to revellings and delights, which belong to the night-time; we have chosen sobriety, by grace of which Jacob found the primacy he did not have.

Explanation 45, chapter 15

45.15.1CSEL 64:340

In aliis quoque codicibus inuenitur: adiuuat eam deus uultu. quid hoc quoque significet, ipse propheta nos doceat; namque ipse in posterioribus dixit: ostende faciem tuam, et salui erimus. aspectus ergo dei salus nostra est atque in eius uultu nostrum est adiumentum. in quo quanta uis sit, diuina scriptura declarat, quae non otiose adtexuit, quod respexit deus super munera Abel, super Cain autem non respexit;

In other copies too one finds: “God helps her with his countenance.” What this too means the prophet himself may teach us; for he himself said further on: “Show your face, and we shall be saved.” The sight of God, then, is our salvation, and in his countenance is our help. How great the power in it is, divine Scripture declares, which not idly added that God looked upon the gifts of Abel, but upon Cain he did not look;

45.15.2CSEL 64:340

et ideo contristatus est Cain, quod sacrificium suum deo displicuisse cognouit, placuisse germani. unde et illud, quod hodie in psalmi responsorio decantatum est, plurimum nostrae conducit assertioni: expectans expectaui dominum, et respexit me. quem dominus respicit saluat. denique in domini passione cum titubaret Petrus sermone, non mente — licet ipse Petri sermo titubantis fidelior sit quam doctrina multorum —, respexit eum Christus et Petrus fleuit, quo proprium lauit errorem. ita quem uoce uisus est denegare, lacrimis fatebatur.

and therefore Cain was sad, because he knew that his sacrifice had displeased God and his brother’s had pleased. Hence too what was sung today in the responsory of the psalm greatly serves our argument: “Waiting, I waited for the Lord, and he looked on me.” Whom the Lord looks on, he saves. Finally, at the Lord’s passion, when Peter wavered in word, not in mind — though even the word of Peter wavering is more faithful than the teaching of many —, Christ looked on him and Peter wept, by which he washed away his error. So him whom he seemed to deny with his voice, he confessed with tears.

Explanation 45, chapter 16

45.16.1CSEL 64:340–341

Conturbatae sunt gentes, inclinata sunt regna; dedit uocem suam altissimus et mota est terra. aduentu domini saluatoris aduersariae potestates cum sua legione turbatae sunt iussae ab humanis exire corporibus et precatae, ut mitterentur in porcos. turbatis nequissimis potestatibus necesse fuit turbari cultores simulacrorum, inclinari quoque regna peccati. erat enim graue regnum, quod sibi in graue seruitium subiugauerat omnium animos peccatorum; qui enim peccatum facit seruus est peccati.

“The nations were troubled, the kingdoms bowed down; the Most High gave his voice, and the earth was moved.” At the coming of the Lord Saviour the adverse powers with their legion were troubled, commanded to go out of human bodies, and begged to be sent into the swine. When the most wicked powers were troubled, the worshippers of idols had to be troubled, and the kingdoms of sin to bow down. For it was a heavy kingdom, which had subjected to itself in heavy servitude the minds of all sinners; for he who commits sin is the slave of sin.

45.16.2CSEL 64:341

regnum autem peccati mortis est regnum, quod diu toto orbe praeualuit. unde et apostolus ait: sed regnauit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen etiam in eos qui non peccauerunt in similitudinem praeuaricationis Adae, qui est forma futuri. uenit ueritas, figura cessauit; uenit uita, regnum mortis euanuit; uenit remissio peccatorum et peccati uincla resoluta sunt. ante etiam leuiora delicta mortis nexibus stringebantur, post aduentum autem domini salutaris etiam grauiora flagitia sunt remissa.

And the kingdom of sin is the kingdom of death, which long prevailed in the whole world. Hence the apostle too says: “But death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of the one to come.” The truth came, the figure ceased; life came, the kingdom of death vanished; the forgiveness of sins came, and the chains of sin were loosed. Before, even lighter offences were bound with the knots of death; but after the coming of the saving Lord even graver crimes have been forgiven.

45.16.3CSEL 64:341

inclinata sunt ergo regna spiritalium nequitiarum quae sunt in caelestibus, quia cultus simulacrorum et inlecebra peccati coepit inminui euangelicae praedicatione doctrinae. inclinata est perfidia, postea quam fides coepit in nationum regnare pectoribus. inclinantur regna peccati, cum legitur: non regnet peccatum in uestro mortali corpore. inclinauit omnia regna perfidiae uoce sua dominus dicens: uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam.

So the kingdoms of the spiritual wickednesses that are in the heavenly places bowed down, because the worship of idols and the enticement of sin began to diminish through the preaching of gospel teaching. Faithlessness bowed down after faith began to reign in the hearts of the nations. The kingdoms of sin bow down when it is read: “Let not sin reign in your mortal body.” The Lord bowed down all the kingdoms of faithlessness with his voice, saying: “Come to me, all you who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you.”

Explanation 45, chapter 17

45.17.1CSEL 64:341

Hanc uocem dedit altissimus et omnes secuti sunt populi nationum, dura peccati regna fugientes et perpetuae mortis atrocitatem atque intolerabilem flagitiorum omnium seruitutem, cum polliceretur fessis requiem, captiuis remissionem, seruientibus libertatem et decusso iugo ferreo Babylonii regis iugum suum suaue ceruicibus fidelium subrogaret, ne uacua colla gentilium rursus inimicus catenis suae iniquitatis adstringeret. Christus enim quos alligat liberat et quos adstringit absoluit.

This voice the Most High gave, and all the peoples of the nations followed, fleeing the hard kingdoms of sin and the cruelty of everlasting death and the intolerable servitude of all crimes, since he promised rest to the weary, release to captives, freedom to slaves, and, having shaken off the iron yoke of the Babylonian king, put his own sweet yoke on the necks of the faithful, lest the enemy should again bind the empty necks of the gentiles with the chains of his iniquity. For Christ frees those whom he binds and releases those whom he ties.

45.17.2CSEL 64:341–342

denique, qui seruus uocatus a domino est, libertus est domini, et qui liber uocatus, seruus Christi est. ideoque Paulus in suis uinculis gloriatur dicens: Paulus uinctus Iesu. quod sub aliis contumelia, sub Christo gloria est. dedit uocem suam in passione dominus et uniuersa elementa tremuerunt, omnis terra commota est, ut ritus gentilium solueretur, fieret terra domini et plenitudo eius, ut scriptum

Finally, he who is called by the Lord as a slave is the Lord’s freedman, and he who is called free is the slave of Christ. And therefore Paul glories in his chains, saying: “Paul, a prisoner of Jesus.” What under others is an insult is glory under Christ. The Lord gave his voice in his passion, and all the elements trembled, the whole earth was moved, so that the rites of the gentiles might be undone, and the earth might become the Lord’s and its fullness, as it is

45.17.3CSEL 64:342

est, cessarent auguria perfidorum, sacrificium impietatis cognitio fidei et studium deuotionis abolerent. dat uocem suam dominus cotidie et resultat in cordibus singulorum, ut terrenum omne decidat eius qui bene credit affectu atque omnis interiorum sensus animorum ab errore, a corruptione luxuriae et dissolutione ad cognitionem caelestium sacramentorum et studium castitatis, a nequitia ad uirtutem pia confessione moueatur.

written, so that the auguries of the faithless might cease, and knowledge of the faith and zeal of devotion might abolish the sacrifice of impiety. The Lord gives his voice daily, and it resounds in the hearts of each, so that everything earthly may fall away from the affection of him who believes well, and every sense of the inner mind may be moved by pious confession from error, from the corruption and looseness of luxury, to the knowledge of the heavenly sacraments and the pursuit of chastity, from wickedness to virtue.

Explanation 45, chapter 18

45.18.1CSEL 64:342

Motos ergo eos dicit qui in terra sunt, uel quia terra erant omnes homines in quibus erat terrena corruptio, quia oculos mentium ad sublime gratiae caelestis eleuare atque attollere nesciebant nec poterant dicere:

So he says that those who are on the earth were moved, or because all men were earth in whom there was earthly corruption, because they did not know how to lift up and raise the eyes of their minds to the height of heavenly grace, nor could they say:

45.18.2CSEL 64:342–343

deus uirtutum nobiscum, cum quibus non erat nisi prolapsionis incentor et auctor erroris. sed posteaquam uox domini in euangelio resultauit, audet propheta dicere: deus uirtutum nobiscum. bene dicit: deus uirtutum nobiscum, qui credidit quod uirgo in utero accepit et peperit. audemus et nos dicere: deus uirtutum nobiscum, posteaquam Emmanuel, hoc est deus coepit esse nobiscum. ubi ergo Emmanuel, ibi deus uirtutum nobiscum.

“The God of powers is with us”, with whom there was none but the instigator of the fall and the author of error. But after the voice of the Lord resounded in the gospel, the prophet dares to say: “The God of powers is with us.” Rightly says “The God of powers is with us” he who has believed that a virgin conceived in the womb and gave birth. We too dare to say: “The God of powers is with us”, since Emmanuel, that is, God, began to be with us. Where, then, Emmanuel is, there the God of powers is with us.

Explanation 45, chapter 19

45.19.1CSEL 64:343

Susceptor noster deus Iacob. imitemur ergo patriarcham Iacob, odorem eius, uirtutem eius, laborem eius. sicut enim Abrahae opera facere debemus, ut filii eius appellari iure mereamur, ita etiam exercitia atque certamina sancti Iacob subire debemus, ut deus Iacob deus noster esse credatur. nam si opera Iacob uel, quia illum aequare non possumus, studia operis eius ac fidei non agnoscat in nobis, quomodo quasi deus Iacob nos iuuare dignabitur?

“The God of Jacob is our protector.” Let us imitate, then, the patriarch Jacob, his fragrance, his virtue, his labour. For just as we ought to do the works of Abraham to be found worthy to be rightly called his sons, so too we ought to undergo the exercises and contests of holy Jacob, so that the God of Jacob may be believed to be our God. For if he does not recognize in us the works of Jacob, or, since we cannot equal him, the zeal of his work and faith, how will he deign to help us as the God of Jacob?

Explanation 45, chapter 20

45.20.1CSEL 64:343

Cum haec dicit, ecce per spiritum sanctum praesens imago ei infusa est futurorum et uidens ex graui perturbatione bellorum pacem toto orbe diffusam in aduentu domini salutaris clamat ad uniuersos dicens: uenite et uidete opera domini, quae posuit prodigia super terram. uenite ad congregationem spectat, uidete ad intentionem et cognoscendae studium ueritatis. uidete, inquit, opera domini plena miraculis, in quibus magnarum sunt signa uirtutum. denique τέρατα Graece admiranda dicuntur Latine. non ergo quasi prodigialis horroris accipias opera domini, sed quasi plena admirationis. praeclare posuit super terram, id est in terram.

When he says this, see, through the Holy Spirit a present image of things to come is poured into him, and, seeing peace spread over the whole world after the heavy turmoil of wars at the coming of the saving Lord, he cries to all, saying: “Come and see the works of the Lord, the wonders he has set upon the earth.” “Come” refers to the gathering, “see” to attention and zeal for knowing the truth. See, he says, the works of the Lord full of miracles, in which are the signs of great powers. Indeed terata in Greek is said “things to be wondered at” in Latin. So do not take the works of the Lord as of portentous horror, but as full of wonder. Splendidly he put “upon the earth”, that is, onto the earth.

Explanation 45, chapter 21

45.21.1CSEL 64:343

Auferens bella usque ad fines terrae arcum conteret et confringet arma et scuta comburet igni. et uere, antequam Romanum diffunderetur imperium, non solum singularum urbium reges aduersum se proeliabantur, sed etiam ipsi Romani bellis frequenter ciuilibus atterebantur. pugnauit Marius aduersus Cinnam, in utraque parte Romanus fusus est sanguis. Sylla insurrexit et Mario uictori rursus ciuilia bella commouit.

“Taking away wars to the ends of the earth, he will break the bow and shatter weapons and burn shields with fire.” And truly, before the Roman empire spread abroad, not only did the kings of single cities fight one another, but the Romans themselves too were worn down by frequent civil wars. Marius fought against Cinna; on both sides Roman blood was shed. Sulla rose up and stirred civil wars again against the victorious Marius.

45.21.2CSEL 64:343–344

Lepidus Sertoriusque rebelles se Romano imperio praebuerunt. Caesar Pompeium est persecutus et Galliarum furorem excitauit aduersus arma Romana. deuicto seniore Pompeio iuniorem in Hispaniarum partibus debellauit. quid triumuiros loquar ex hostibus amicos, ex amicis rursus in hostiles tumultus esse progressos, maria quoque Actiaco bello infecta sanguine Romanorum? unde factum est, ut taedio bellorum ciuilium Iulio Augusto Romanum deferretur imperium, et ita proelia intestina sedata sunt.

Lepidus and Sertorius showed themselves rebels against the Roman empire. Caesar pursued Pompey and stirred up the fury of the Gauls against Roman arms. Having conquered the elder Pompey, he defeated the younger in the regions of Spain. Why should I speak of the triumvirs, who went from enemies to friends and from friends back again to hostile tumults, and of the seas too stained with Roman blood in the war of Actium? Hence it came about that, from weariness of civil wars, the Roman empire was offered to Julius Augustus, and so internal battles were calmed.

45.21.3CSEL 64:344

hoc autem eo profecit, ut recte per totum orbem apostoli mitterentur dicente domino Iesu: euntes docete omnes gentes. illis quidem etiam interclusa barbaricis motibus regna patuerunt, ut Thomae India, Matthaeo Persia. sed tamen, quo plura obirent spatia terrarum, in exortu ecclesiae potestatem Romani imperii toto orbe diffudit et dissidentium mentes terrarumque diuortia donata pace composuit. didicerunt omnes homines sub uno terrarum imperio uiuentes unius dei omnipotentis imperium fideli eloquio confiteri.

And this served the purpose that the apostles might rightly be sent through the whole world, the Lord Jesus saying: “Go, teach all nations.” To them indeed even kingdoms closed by barbarian movements lay open, as India to Thomas, Persia to Matthew. But yet, so that they might travel over more of the earth, at the rise of the church he spread the power of the Roman empire through the whole world and reconciled the minds of those at variance and the separations of lands by the gift of peace. All men, living under one earthly empire, learned to confess with faithful speech the empire of the one almighty God.

Explanation 45, chapter 22

45.22.1CSEL 64:344

Abstulit ergo bella usque in fines terrae, quod factum esse non dubium est. sed uide ne bella infirmitatis abstulerit, quae sunt in corde titubantium. qui enim terrena transierit, iam non dicit: foris pugnae, intus timores, sed dicit: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est. transi ergo mundum, ut incipias esse supra mundum; περᾶσαι enim transire est uel, ut dicam expressius, transfretare. abstulit ergo dominus bella quae mouebat nobis nequitia spiritalis et deuicto diabolo pacem suam nobis reliquit. arcum confregit, de quo ignita aduersarii iacula spargebantur et scuta perfidiae combussit igni, ut scutum fidei inuiolabile permaneret.

So he took away wars to the ends of the earth, which no doubt came about. But see whether he has not taken away the wars of weakness which are in the heart of the wavering. For he who has passed beyond earthly things no longer says, “Fightings without, fears within”, but says: “But our citizenship is in heaven.” Pass beyond the world, then, so that you may begin to be above the world; for perasai means to pass over or, to speak more expressly, to cross the sea. So the Lord took away the wars which spiritual wickedness stirred against us, and, having conquered the devil, left us his peace. He broke the bow from which the fiery darts of the adversary were scattered and burned the shields of faithlessness with fire, so that the shield of faith might remain inviolable.

Explanation 45, chapter 23

45.23.1CSEL 64:344–345

Uacate, inquit, et uidete quia ego sum dominus. uox domini post bella sedata uacate, ut nulla animarum sit occupatio, ne offusio saecularium perturbationum internae oculum mentis obducat. uacate, inquit, ab erroribus, uacate a perturbationibus, uacate a peccatis, quia omnis qui peccat non uidit deum nec cognouit eum, sicut in epistula sua dixit Iohannes euangelista.

“Be still,” he says, “and see that I am the Lord.” The voice of the Lord after wars are calmed is “be still”, so that there may be no occupation of souls, lest the overflow of worldly disturbances cover the inner eye of the mind. Be still, he says, from errors; be still from disturbances; be still from sins, because everyone who sins has not seen God nor known him, as John the evangelist said in his epistle.

45.23.2CSEL 64:345

uacate ergo studio cognoscendae diuinitatis, nolite terrenis operibus occupari. ideo rex Aegyptiorum augeri iubebat numerum laterum et cetera onera Iudaeorum, ne cognoscerent deum et cultui sacro uacarent, offensus Moysi et Aaron uoce sanctorum, qui dicebant: dimitte populum dei, ut eamus et seruiamus domino deo nostro.

So be free for the pursuit of knowing the Godhead; do not be occupied with earthly works. That is why the king of the Egyptians ordered the tally of bricks and the other burdens of the Jews to be increased, so that they might not know God and be free for sacred worship, offended at the voice of the saints Moses and Aaron, who said: “Let the people of God go, that we may go and serve the Lord our God.”

Explanation 45, chapter 24

45.24.1CSEL 64:345

Exaltabor inter gentes et exaltabor in terra. erat sublimis dominus in excelsis, id est in angelis et archangelis, in patriarchis et prophetis, qui de illo sublimia sentiebant nec eum terrenis imaginibus et simulacris scrupeis conferebant, sed non erat sublimis in populis nationum, qui deum suum in antris et spelaeorum habitaculis requirere uidebantur. denique reprehenditur Magdalena, quae Christum quasi mortuum flebat et quasi sepultum quaerebat in tumulo.

“I will be exalted among the nations, and I will be exalted on the earth.” The Lord was lofty in the heights, that is, among the angels and archangels, among the patriarchs and prophets, who thought lofty things of him and did not compare him to earthly images and stony idols; but he was not lofty among the peoples of the nations, who seemed to seek their god in caves and the dwellings of grottoes. Finally Magdalene is rebuked, who wept for Christ as though dead and sought him in the tomb as though buried.

45.24.2CSEL 64:345

unde dicit ad eam Christus: Maria, quid ploras? quem quaeris? numquid eum qui posset auferri? audiuit uocem et recognouit eum et uolebat contingere et ait dominus: noli me tangere quem putas mortuum; ad patrem uado. miraris, quod in tumulo non inuenisti quem caelestia praestolantur? aut forte reprehenditur, quia Christum nisi fides perfecta non tangit, sicut haemorrousa plena eum tetigit fide. unde ait dominus: tetigit me aliquis; sentio de me uirtutem exisse.

Hence Christ says to her: “Mary, why are you weeping? Whom do you seek?” Is it one who could be taken away? She heard the voice and recognized him and wished to touch him, and the Lord said: “Do not touch me”, whom you think dead; “I go to the Father.” Are you surprised that you did not find in the tomb him whom heavenly things await? Or perhaps she is rebuked because nothing but perfect faith touches Christ, as the woman with the flow of blood touched him with full faith. Hence the Lord says: “Someone touched me; I perceive that power has gone out from me.”

45.24.3CSEL 64:345–346

quo dicto agnouit in se illa, quod exeunte fuerat uirtute curata, et statim confessa est sui conscia, quod dominum ipsa tetigisset. unde dominus ait: fides tua te saluam fecit; uade in pace. exaltatus autem in terra dominus est, secundum quod ipse ait: cum exaltatus fuero, omnia traham ad me ipsum, uel quod facta est uoluntas eius sicut in caelo et in terra.

At this word she recognized in herself that she had been healed by the power going out, and at once, conscious of herself, confessed that she had touched the Lord. Hence the Lord says: “Your faith has saved you; go in peace.” And the Lord was exalted on the earth, according to what he himself says: “When I am exalted, I will draw all things to myself”; or because his will was done as in heaven so on earth.

Explanation 45, chapter 25

45.25.1CSEL 64:346

Et repetit dicens: deus uirtutum nobiscum, susceptor noster deus Iacob. repetitio confirmatio est. uel quia non solum, quando natus ex uirgine est, factus est nobiscum deus, sed etiam post resurrectionem ipse dixit: ecce ego uobiscum sum usque ad consummationem mundi, cui honor et gloria, perpetuitas a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

And he repeats, saying: “The God of powers is with us; the God of Jacob is our protector.” Repetition is confirmation. Or because not only when he was born of the Virgin did God become with us, but also after the resurrection he himself said: “See, I am with you until the end of the world”; to whom be honour and glory, everlastingness, from the ages, now and always and for all ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 47, chapter 1

47.1.1CSEL 64:346

Huius titulus hic est: Psalmus cantici filiis Core, secunda sabbati. boni filii Core et psalmis iam superioribus approbati, eo quod congruis sensibus et cogitationibus ad uirtutum studia conuenientibus in semet ipsis pangerent spiri-

Its title is this: “A psalm of a song for the sons of Korah, on the second day of the week.” Good are the sons of Korah, and approved already in the preceding psalms, because with fitting thoughts and reflections agreeing with the pursuit of virtues they composed in themselves a spiritual

47.1.2CSEL 64:346–347

tale psalterium et cognitioni diuinitatis peruigili specula mentis intenti caelestium mysteriorum digni forent haurire secreta. et ideo cum psalmorum ante arcam domini cotidie canendorum munus et officium recepissent, uidentur electi, ut psalmum cantici in secunda sabbati specialiter reciperent concinendum. etenim quibus recte uidebatur esse commissum, ut ascensionem domini ab inferis resurgentis uoce sua psallerent, his utique deferendum fuit, ut ipsum resurrectionis diem munere suo ministerioque celebrarent.

psaltery, and, intent with the watchful look-out of the mind on the knowledge of the Godhead, were worthy to draw in the secrets of the heavenly mysteries. And therefore, since they had received the office and duty of singing psalms daily before the ark of the Lord, they seem to have been chosen to receive specially the psalm of a song for the second day of the week to sing. For to those to whom it seemed rightly entrusted to sing with their voice the ascension of the Lord rising from the dead, it was surely fitting to entrust also the celebration by their office and ministry of the very day of the resurrection.

47.1.3CSEL 64:347

quid est enim secunda sabbati nisi dominica dies, quae sabbatum sequebatur? dies autem sabbati erat dierum ordine posterior, sanctificatione legis anterior. sed ubi finis legis aduenit, qui est Christus Iesus — finis enim legis Christus ad iustitiam omni credenti — et resurrectione sua sanctificauit octauam, coepit eadem prima esse quae octaua est et octaua quae prima, habens ex numeri ordine praerogatiuam et ex resurrectione domini sanctitatem.

For what is “the second day of the week” but the Lord’s day, which followed the sabbath? The sabbath day was later in the order of days, earlier in the sanctification of the law. But when the end of the law came, which is Christ Jesus — for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes — and by his resurrection sanctified the eighth day, the same day began to be the first which is the eighth, and the eighth which is the first, having its privilege from the order of number and its holiness from the Lord’s resurrection.

47.1.4CSEL 64:347

unde et in euangelio legimus δευτερόπρωτον sabbatum, quod Latine dicitur secundoprimum. ubi enim dominica dies coepit praecellere qua dominus resurrexit, sabbatum quod primum erat secundum haberi coepit a primo; prima enim requies cessauit, secunda successit. unde et ad Hebraeos scribens apostolus ait: postera die ergo restat requies populo dei. festinemus igitur intrare in requiem illam.

Hence we also read in the gospel of a deuteroprōton sabbath, which in Latin is called “second-first”. For when the Lord’s day, on which the Lord rose, began to take precedence, the sabbath that was first began to be held second from the first; for the first rest ceased, the second followed. Hence the apostle too, writing to the Hebrews, says: “So on the following day there remains a rest for the people of God. Let us hasten, then, to enter that rest.”

Explanation 47, chapter 2

47.2.1CSEL 64:347

Requies ergo uera iam non in operis cessatione, sed in resurrectionis est tempore. ideoque qui sabbati secundum legem sollemnitatem custodiebant, unam sabbati nuncupabant, quasi unum esset sabbatum et non aliud. nos, qui obseruantiam induimus spiritalem et ad similitudinem et requiem dei cupimus nostram formare militiam atque in illa ciuitate caelesti nostrum exhibere ministerium, ubi non est exemplar, non umbra, sed ueritas, primam dicimus sabbati, sicut est scriptum: uespere autem sabbati, quae lucescit in primam sabbati.

The true rest, then, is no longer in the cessation of work but in the time of the resurrection. And therefore those who kept the solemnity of the sabbath according to the law called it “one of the sabbath”, as though there were one sabbath and not another. We, who have put on a spiritual observance and wish to form our warfare to the likeness and rest of God and to show our service in that heavenly city, where there is no copy, no shadow, but truth, say “the first of the sabbath”, as it is written: “But late on the sabbath, as it was dawning toward the first of the sabbath.”

47.2.2CSEL 64:347–348

nihil autem pulchrius, nihil expressius. ante resurrectionem sabbatum dixit, post resurrectionem primam sabbati nuncupauit. Iohannes quoque euangelista dicit: prima sabbati uenit mane Maria Magdalena, cum adhuc tenebrae essent,

Nothing is more beautiful, nothing more expressive. Before the resurrection he said “sabbath”; after the resurrection he named it “the first of the sabbath”. John the evangelist also says: “On the first of the sabbath Mary Magdalene came in the morning, while it was still dark”;

47.2.3CSEL 64:348

tenebrae pro tempore, mane pro gratia. sed isti expressius secundum euangelium quasi recusso uelamine, Dauid autem sub lege positus et moderationem tenuit debitae cautionis et mysterium non repressit, ut secunda sabbati diem dominicam declararet, quo Iudaeis ordinem numeri putaret esse seruatum et spiritale sacramentum agnosceret reuelatum. audiamus igitur quid dicat qui in secunda sabbati deo psallit.

darkness for the time, morning for grace. But these spoke more expressly, according to the gospel, as with the veil pulled back; David, however, set under the law, both kept the moderation of due caution and did not hold back the mystery, so as to declare the Lord’s day as “the second of the sabbath”, by which he might think the order of number kept for the Jews and recognize the spiritual sacrament revealed. Let us hear, then, what he says who sings to God on the second of the sabbath.

Explanation 47, chapter 3

47.3.1CSEL 64:348

Magnus, inquit, dominus et laudabilis nimis in ciuitate dei nostri, in loco sancto eius. non ergo ubique deus magnus et laudabilis est? ille quidem ubique magnus et potens est, sed angusta mens non capit magnitudinem diuinae eius potestatis et gratiae. quanto autem magis appropin-

“Great,” he says, “is the Lord and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in his holy place.” Is God not great and praiseworthy everywhere, then? He is indeed great and powerful everywhere, but a narrow mind does not grasp the greatness of his divine power and grace. But the more our knowledge draws near

47.3.2CSEL 64:348

quat deo nostra cognitio, tanto praecellentior eius nobis uidetur esse maiestas. denique Thomas, qui ante dicebat: nisi uidero in manibus eius fixuras clauorum et mittam manum meam in latus eius, non credam, ubi misit digitum suum et euidentia resurrectionis cognouit indicia, admiratus intra se dei gratiam:

to God, the more surpassing his majesty seems to us. Finally Thomas, who before said: “Unless I see in his hands the print of the nails and put my hand into his side, I will not believe”, when he put in his finger and recognized the evident signs of the resurrection, marvelling within himself at the grace of God,

47.3.3CSEL 64:348

dominus, inquit, meus et deus meus. tunc ergo plenissime diuinitatem eius dominationemque confessus est, ubi eum resurrexisse non dubitauit ab inferis. denique in Sion hymnus deum decet et uotum ei soluitur in Hierusalem. quid igitur mirum, si in ciuitate caelesti et in illo superno et aetherio loco potentia eius uehementius praedicatur?

said: “My Lord and my God.” Then, therefore, he most fully confessed his divinity and lordship, when he did not doubt that he had risen from the dead. Finally, “in Sion a hymn befits God, and a vow is paid to him in Jerusalem.” What wonder, then, if in the heavenly city and in that high and ethereal place his power is more strongly proclaimed?

Explanation 47, chapter 4

47.4.1CSEL 64:348–349

Addidit: dilatans exultationem uniuersae terrae. et uere magnus dicitur, qui istius terrae, in qua ante intolerabilium peccatorum germina pullulabant, ubi erat maeror, tristitia et gemitus, exultationem toto orbe diffudit. itaque hominum conscientia, quae ante flagitiorum suorum gurgitibus demersa lugebat, nunc per indulgentiam Christi et remissionem omnium peccatorum metu absoluta laetatur. conuenit igitur et si ita intellegamus ut diximus.

He added: “Spreading the exultation of the whole earth.” And truly he is called great who spread exultation over the whole world of this earth, in which before the shoots of intolerable sins were sprouting, where there was grief, sadness and groaning. And so men’s conscience, which before mourned, sunk in the whirlpools of its crimes, now rejoices, freed from fear through the indulgence of Christ and the forgiveness of all sins. It fits, then, if we understand it as we have said.

47.4.2CSEL 64:349

sed quia in uetustis exemplaribus aliquibus repperimus: εὐρίζω ἁγαλλιάματι πάσης τῆς γῆς, quod Latine significat bona radice exultatione uniuersae terrae, sensum quidem eundem aduertimus, quia diuina in nobis dei patris dona laudentur, qui dedit nobis exultationem bona radice fundatam, deum uidelicet Iesum, ueram et fecundissimam uitem, de qua sacramenta fluxere caelestia, in quibus est perpetua et diuturna laetitia, quod his abluatur omne peccatum et conscientia interna mundetur, elocutionemque conuenire cognoscimus, quia bene radicata exultatione laetamur qui exultamus in Christo. saeculi enim laetitia temporalis est, perpetua autem laetitia eius qui gaudet in domino.

But since in some old copies we have found: euridzō agalliamati pasēs tēs gēs, which in Latin means “well-rooted with the exultation of the whole earth”, we notice indeed the same sense, that the divine gifts of God the Father in us are praised, who has given us an exultation founded on a good root, namely God Jesus, the true and most fruitful vine, from which the heavenly sacraments have flowed, in which there is perpetual and lasting joy, because by them every sin is washed away and the inner conscience is cleansed; and we recognize that the wording fits, because we who exult in Christ rejoice with a well-rooted exultation. For the joy of the world is temporal, but perpetual is the joy of him who rejoices in the Lord.

Explanation 47, chapter 5

47.5.1CSEL 64:349

Mons Sion, latera aquilonis, ciuitas regis magni. deus in gradibus eius dinoscitur, cum suscipiet eam. cur sit exultatio uniuersae terrae, euidenter expressit, quoniam dominus Iesus ecclesiam sibi ex peccatoribus congregauit. itaque qui erant ante latera aquilonis, id est socii et inhaerentes diabolo, cui dicitur: exurge, aquilo, ut ueniat auster, facti sunt Christo fideles. ipsi sunt enim de quibus dicitur: qui confidunt in domino sicut mons Sion.

“Mount Sion, the sides of the north, the city of the great king. God is known in her steps, when he takes her up.” Why there is exultation of the whole earth he expressed clearly, since the Lord Jesus gathered a church to himself from sinners. So those who were before the sides of the north, that is, allies and adherents of the devil, to whom it is said: “Arise, north wind, that the south wind may come”, have become faithful to Christ. For they are the ones of whom it is said: “Those who trust in the Lord are like Mount Sion.”

47.5.2CSEL 64:349–350

facti sunt itaque mons Sion per gratiam Christi et baptismatis sacramentum. aquilonis intellegibilis graues flatus, quibus tempestates asperrimas et procellas humanis mouebat affectibus. coepit suos amittere qui uexabat alienos. gentem omnem euerterat Iudaeorum, nationes omnes suo reuictas tenebat imperio, ipsius erant latera, hoc est adspirabant cum eo. sicut principis latera dicimus stipatores eius et comites, sicut mulier latus est uiri, eo

So they have become Mount Sion through the grace of Christ and the sacrament of baptism. The heavy blasts of the spiritual north wind, by which he stirred the harshest storms and gales in human affections — he who harassed others began to lose his own. He had overthrown the whole nation of the Jews, held all the nations conquered under his rule; they were his sides, that is, they breathed with him. As we call the sides of a prince his guards and companions, as the woman is the side of the man, because

47.5.3CSEL 64:350

quod morigera ei societate iungatur, ita latera erant diaboli qui faciebant ipsius uoluntatem. hi ergo nunc sunt mons Sion, qui deum speculantur aeternum et ipsi noctibus et diebus intendunt. uide mihi Paulum, cum persequeretur ecclesiam domini, latus aqui-

she is joined to him in compliant fellowship, so those were the sides of the devil who did his will. These, then, are now Mount Sion, who keep watch for the eternal God and attend to him night and day. See Paul, when he persecuted the church of the Lord, a side of the north;

47.5.4CSEL 64:350

lonis fuisse, uide nunc, cum legitur in ecclesia, montem esse speculatorium, per quem Christi gloriam cognoscimus et uidemus. et quia Graecus montes dixit, hoc est ὄρη, uide quomodo serui Christi montes sint, montes in circuitu eius, in quibus est ecclesia domini quae est ciuitas regis magni. simul quia dominus secundum caeli tractum ἐν Κρανίῳ passus est, qui erat locus in latere aquilonis. ibi autem et mons Sion, ibi Hierusalem quae in terris.

see him now, when he is read in the church, a mountain of watch, through whom we know and see the glory of Christ. And since the Greek said “mountains”, that is, orē, see how the servants of Christ are mountains, mountains round about him, among which is the church of the Lord, which is the city of the great king. At the same time, because the Lord suffered according to the tract of the sky at Kranion, which was a place on the side of the north. And there is Mount Sion, there the Jerusalem which is on earth.

Explanation 47, chapter 6

47.6.1CSEL 64:350–351

Uide ne id quoque uideatur expressum, quia congregatio plebis dei, quae erat aquiloni coniuncta per culpam, ecclesia Christi est facta per gratiam, ut iam non synagoga, sed Christi ecclesia nuncupetur. et quia reliquiae Iudaeorum per electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt, in ipsis deus cognoscitur, in Petro Paulo Iohanne Iacobo, qui graues et excelsi uiri uelut fundamenta et culmina sunt ecclesiae, quasi fundamenta grauia, quos nulla grauis aquilonis flabra concusserint, sed immobiles fidei seruauerunt fundamentum, ne ecclesia tota nutaret, praecelsi quasi culmina, qui uerticem eius turribus suae uirtutis erexerint.

See whether this too does not seem to be expressed: that the congregation of the people of God, which was joined to the north wind by guilt, has become the church of Christ by grace, so that it is now called not synagogue but church of Christ. And since a remnant of the Jews was saved by the election of grace, in them God is known, in Peter, Paul, John, James, who, weighty and lofty men, are as it were foundations and summits of the church: weighty foundations, whom no heavy blasts of the north wind shook, but who kept the foundation of faith unmoved, lest the whole church should totter; lofty as summits, who raised its top with the towers of their virtue.

47.6.2CSEL 64:351

etenim sicut in operibus suis conditor et in aedificationibus suis aedificator agnoscitur, ut, etiamsi nomen non audias, tamen ex operum qualitate artificem deprehendas — et quid mirum de humanis, cum ipsius creatoris aeterni, qui non uidetur a nobis, inuisibilia tamen [eius] per ea quae facta sunt intellegamus? —, ita in excelsis et magnis domibus, quae domus nos sumus, si libertatis et gloriae fundamentum usque ad finem firmum tenuerimus, deus habitator agnoscitur, ut deus Abraham, deus Isaac, deus Iacob.

For as the founder is recognized in his works and the builder in his buildings, so that, even if you do not hear his name, you find out the craftsman from the quality of the works — and what wonder in human things, when we understand the invisible things of the eternal Creator himself, who is not seen by us, through the things that have been made? —, so in lofty and great houses, which houses we are, if we hold firm to the end the foundation of freedom and glory, God is recognized as dweller, as the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob.

47.6.3CSEL 64:351

ipse enim uerus deus, qui tales uiros praeceptorum suorum institutione fundauit. ergo sicut in illis se deum demonstrauit aeternum, ita, inquit, cum regis magni suscipiet ciuitatem, gradibus eius receptionem suae audierint et putauerint exsequendum, ne ab illius domus aedificatae in petra firmitate degenerent.

For he is the true God who founded such men by the instruction of his commandments. So, as he showed himself the eternal God in them, so, he says, when he takes up the city of the great king, … they have heard his reception in her steps and have thought it should be followed, so that they do not fall away from the firmness of that house built on the rock.

Explanation 47, chapter 7

47.7.1CSEL 64:351

Hoc, inquit, uidentes reges terrae congregati sunt et transierunt in unum; ipsi uidentes tunc admirati sunt. boni reges, qui sui corporis possunt se praebere rectores, ab ipsa patriarchae Abrahae origine et institutione manantes, qui docuit peccatum posse superari, ideo uerus rex, qui flagitiis esse nesciuit obnoxius, in quo culpae et erroris inlecebra regnare non potuit. unde et dictum est ad huiusmodi uirum a filiis Het: rex a deo tu es nobis.

“For see,” he says, “the kings of the earth were gathered together and passed over into one; they themselves seeing it then marvelled.” Good kings, who can show themselves rulers of their own body, flowing from the very origin and teaching of the patriarch Abraham, who taught that sin can be overcome; therefore a true king is he who did not know how to be liable to crimes, in whom the enticement of guilt and error could not reign. Hence it was also said to such a man by the sons of Heth: “You are a king from God among us.”

47.7.2CSEL 64:351–352

tales ergo reges terrae, qui carni imperitarent, congregati sunt, ut in uno essent corde et in uno spiritu, sicut legimus, quia multitudo credentium habebat unam animam et cor unum et non erat in his aliqua separatio. hi sunt qui transierunt in unum non tam locum quam in eundem affectum atque propositum; probato enim dicitur:

Such kings of the earth, then, who commanded the flesh, were gathered together, so as to be of one heart and one spirit, as we read that the multitude of believers had one soul and one heart and there was no separation among them. These are they who passed over into one, not so much one place as the same affection and purpose; for to one approved it is said:

47.7.3CSEL 64:352

transi, recumbe. neque enim mediocris uirtutis est ab improbis ad honesta, a terrenis ad aeterna transire et carnalis uitae consuetudinem commutare omnemque eius abolere usum, nouos mores assumere totumque statum conuersationis ueteris detorquere, meritoque dicitur ei: si transeas per aquam, tecum sum. cum transeunte est deus, non cum desistente.

“Pass over, recline.” For it is no small virtue to pass over from the wicked to the honourable, from earthly to eternal things, to change the habit of carnal life and abolish all its practice, to take up new ways and turn about the whole state of the old way of life; and rightly it is said to him: “If you pass through water, I am with you.” God is with the one who passes over, not with the one who stops.

Explanation 47, chapter 8

47.8.1CSEL 64:352

Hi ergo, qui intra semet ipsos erant ante discordes, ubi in unum mente et studio conuenerunt, recepta pace, quae fecit utraque unum et inimicitias in carne sua medii parietis destructione dissoluit, admirati sunt uel eum, qui in gradibus suis dinoscitur, uel ho-

These, then, who were before at variance within themselves, when they came together in mind and pursuit, having received the peace which made both one and dissolved the enmities in his flesh by destroying the middle wall, marvelled either at him who is known in her steps, or that

47.8.2CSEL 64:352

mines ita esse conuersos, ut, qui ante diabolo seruiebant, nunc domino Iesu iusti pietate seruitii mancipati sint. et quia reges sui corporis, in semet ipsis non mediocris laboris experti — neque enim facile atque mediocre est animum uincere, resecare cupiditates, edomare carnis lasciuiam, auerruncare luxuriam, quae repugnabat et Paulo, ut captiuum sibi peccati lege constringeret —, sicut gratiam in his qui uirtute processerant mirabantur, ita etiam, ne quis relaberetur in uitia de superiore uirtutum deiectus fastigio, commouebantur. procliuis enim et mutabilis in utrumque est humana condicio, ut quocumque intenderit eo propendat et uergat uel ad studia uirtutum uel ad inlecebram delictorum.

men were so converted that those who before served the devil are now bound over to the Lord Jesus by the righteous piety of service. And since, as kings of their own body, they had experienced in themselves no small labour — for it is not easy or slight to conquer the mind, cut off desires, tame the wantonness of the flesh, root out the luxury that fought even against Paul, to bind him captive by the law of sin —, as they marvelled at the grace in those who had advanced in virtue, so too they were disturbed lest anyone should slip back into vices, cast down from the height of virtues. For the human condition is prone and changeable either way, so that wherever it inclines it leans and turns, either to the pursuit of virtues or to the enticement of offences.

Explanation 47, chapter 9

47.9.1CSEL 64:352–353

Et ideo non mediocri quatiebantur affectu, ita ut ex formidine tremor adprehenderet eos, considerantes illud quod scriptum est, quia in locis impiorum ingemescunt iusti. denique uide mihi Petrum amarissime flentem, quod ei error obrepserit et uirtutem suae mentis prolapsione corporeae fragilitatis inflexerit, meritoque a Christo suppresse reprehensum, quod ausus sit usurpare constantiam nec obnoxiam considerarit naturam.

And therefore they were shaken with no slight feeling, so that trembling from fear seized them, considering what is written, that in the places of the ungodly the righteous groan. Finally, see Peter weeping most bitterly, because error had crept upon him and had bent the virtue of his mind by a slip of bodily frailty, and rightly rebuked quietly by Christ, because he had dared to claim constancy and had not considered that his nature was liable.

47.9.2CSEL 64:353

et hic quidem per gratiam emendauit errorem, sed ludas mansit in crimine, perseuerauit in gemitu. iustus erat, cum apostolorum numero necteretur; sed quia subplantatus a diabolo est, in locis nunc deplorat et ingemit impiorum, quod de gratia sit relapsus ad poenam. ergo cadentibus huiusmodi uiris, qualis fuit proditor ludas uel Saul a domino deo suo adscitus ad regnum, etiam fortes uiri trepidabant.

And he indeed corrected his error through grace, but Judas remained in his crime and persevered in groaning. He was righteous when he was joined to the number of the apostles; but because he was tripped up by the devil, he now laments and groans in the places of the ungodly, because he has slipped back from grace to punishment. So when men of this kind fell, such as Judas the traitor, or Saul, called by the Lord his God to the kingdom, even strong men trembled.

Explanation 47, chapter 10

47.10.1CSEL 64:353

Conferentes deinde, quanto certamine perueniretur ad finem, quantae contritiones iustorum, quantae sollicitudines, qualis aduersarius, quanta diuturno labore contentio, quantae amaritudines propositi seuerioris, quae uincula continentiae, quae conscientiae uerbera, non mediocriter conturbabantur, ne quis tantis uel laboribus uitae austerioris cederet uel doloribus. sunt enim ibi dolores acerbi et graues, id est in ecclesia, in illa ciuitate regis magni sunt dolores sicut parturientis, donec formetur Christus in nobis.

Comparing, then, with how great a contest the end is reached, how great are the contritions of the righteous, how great the anxieties, what an adversary, how great the struggle with long labour, how great the bitternesses of a sterner purpose, what bonds of continence, what scourges of conscience, they were greatly troubled lest anyone should give way to such labours of a stricter life or to such pains. For there are bitter and heavy pains there, that is, in the church; in that city of the great king there are pains as of a woman in labour, until Christ is formed in us.

47.10.2CSEL 64:353

neque enim sine dolore Paulus erat, cum uideret in Galatis insipientibus doctrinae suae tardiorem profectum, ideoque dicebat: filioli mei, quos iterum parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis. testificatur et dominus in euangelio graues esse parturientis dolores, cum dicit: mulier cum parturit tristitiam habet, quia uenit dies eius; cum autem pepererit puerum, iam non meminit tristitiae propter gaudium, quia natus est homo in hoc mundo.

For Paul was not without pain when he saw the slower progress of his teaching in the foolish Galatians, and therefore he said: “My little children, with whom I am again in labour until Christ is formed in you.” The Lord too testifies in the gospel that the pains of a woman in labour are heavy, when he says: “A woman when she is in labour has sorrow, because her day has come; but when she has borne the child, she no longer remembers the sorrow for joy that a man is born into this world.”

47.10.3CSEL 64:353–354

magnus ergo labor, ut aliquis sibi Christum adquirat, ne sine gubernatore quasi nauis in saeculi istius salo fluctuet. denique apostoli tristes erant, cum se Christus ad patrem rediturum esse memoraret, quod absente rectore destitui se putarent. gaudium Christus est, ipse est et puer, quem parturit qui in utero suae mentis accepit spiritum salutis. qui pepererit et enutrierit exultat, qui parturit quatitur atque compungitur.

Great, then, is the labour that one may acquire Christ for oneself, lest one toss like a ship without a helmsman on the sea of this world. Finally, the apostles were sad when Christ said that he would return to the Father, because they thought themselves left without their ruler. Christ is joy; he is also the child whom he bears who has received in the womb of his mind the spirit of salvation. He who has borne and nourished exults; he who is in labour is shaken and pricked.

Explanation 47, chapter 11

47.11.1CSEL 64:354

Bonum est ut et parias et enutrias eum. ne coquas agnum in lacte matris suae, ne dicatur tibi: uae in utero habentibus et nutrientibus. sic enim Christus est natus ex Maria, ut agnoscas eum, sicut bos agnouit possessorem suum, et scias quia ipse te creauit et maiores tuos ipse possedit. non eum quasi paruulum nutrias, sed quasi uerum atque perfectum deum ex uero et perfecto deo noueris adorandum.

It is good that you both bear him and nourish him. Do not cook the lamb in its mother’s milk, lest it be said to you: “Woe to those who are with child and to those who nurse.” For Christ was born of Mary so that you may recognize him, as the ox recognized its owner, and know that he created you and possessed your forefathers. Do not nourish him as a little child, but know that he is to be adored as true and perfect God from true and perfect God.

47.11.2CSEL 64:354

sic enim magus adorauit, ut non in lacte matris agnum coqueret, sed quasi deum ueneraretur aeternum. denique ut eum inueniret caelum aspiciebat; non ergo quaerebat in terris quem de caelo fulgens stella monstrabat. ideo eum Maria non parturiuit, sed peperit, quia et dominum et salutare sciebat ex se esse generandum, sicut ipsa testatur dicens: magnificat anima mea dominum et laetatus est spiritus meus in deo salutari mea. ibi ergo dolores sicut parturientis. dolor est ut parturias, dolor est ut enutrias quem in principio debes habere perfectum.

For so the magus adored him, not cooking the lamb in its mother’s milk, but venerating him as eternal God. Finally, to find him he looked at the sky; he did not seek on earth the one whom the star shining from heaven pointed out. Therefore Mary did not labour with him, but bore him, because she knew that both Lord and Saviour was to be born of her, as she herself testifies, saying: “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Saviour.” There, then, are pains as of a woman in labour. It is pain to labour, pain to nourish him whom you ought to have perfect from the beginning.

Explanation 47, chapter 12

47.12.1CSEL 64:354

Ideoque plerique grauiter conteruntur, sicut uersiculus significat qui secutus est: in spiritu uehementi conteres naues Tharsis. nam dum ad perfectionem fidei desiderant dei famuli peruenire, commacerant corpus suum castigando seuerius et redigendo in ministerium seruitutis, ne reprobentur qui fuerant iam probati.

And therefore many are grievously crushed, as the verse that follows signifies: “With a vehement wind you will break the ships of Tarshish.” For while the servants of God desire to reach the perfection of faith, they wear down their body, chastising it severely and bringing it into the service of slavery, lest they be rejected who had already been approved.

47.12.2CSEL 64:354

hoc autem faciunt in spiritu sancto ualido atque uehementi. est enim spiritus consilii atque uirtutis, ut nimia abstinentia dissoluant corpus suum, quo omnes eius euacuent uoluptates, ut dicatur illis: conualescite, manus remissae et genua dissoluta.

And this they do in the strong and vehement Holy Spirit. For he is the spirit of counsel and power, so that by great abstinence they dissolve their body, by which they empty all its pleasures, so that it may be said to them: “Be strong, you weakened hands and loosened knees.”

47.12.3CSEL 64:354–355

cum enim solutus quis fuerit ab ista compage terrena, tunc fortior ad uitam resurgit aeternam. mentior, nisi adstipulatur scriptura, quae dicit: dissolui et cum Christo esse multo melius — qui dissoluitur, incipit esse cum Christo — et alibi: tempus meae resolutionis instat. qui ergo meditatus fuerit se ipsum dissoluere per abstinentiam, diem passionis suae timere non poterit.

For when someone has been dissolved from this earthly frame, then he rises stronger to eternal life. I lie, unless Scripture supports me, which says: “To be dissolved and to be with Christ is much better” — he who is dissolved begins to be with Christ —, and elsewhere: “The time of my dissolution is at hand.” He, then, who has practised dissolving himself through abstinence cannot fear the day of his passion.

Explanation 47, chapter 13

47.13.1CSEL 64:355

Et bene ait spiritum uehementem, naues dicturus. naues autem de corporibus dixit, quae uago diuersarum passionum fluctu mouentur et cito merguntur, nisi habeant gubernatorem. unde et alibi ait: qui descendunt in mare in nauibus.

And rightly he said “a vehement wind”, when he was going to say “ships”. He spoke of ships for bodies, which are moved by the wandering wave of different passions and quickly sink unless they have a helmsman. Hence he says elsewhere: “Those who go down to the sea in ships.”

47.13.2CSEL 64:355

bene autem nauigant, qui in nauibus Christi crucem sicut arborem praeferunt atque inde explorant flabra uentorum, ut corpora sua dirigant ad sancti spiritus gratiam, in ligno domini tuti atque securi, nec permittunt naues suas uago fluctu errare per maria, sed ad portum salutis et ad consummationem gratiae cursus sui directione contendunt, ut fida statione potiantur, quo dissolutae cursus suos possint in resurrectione reparare, ubi naufragium timere non possint.

But they sail well who carry the cross of Christ on their ships like a mast and from it observe the blasts of the winds, so as to direct their bodies to the grace of the Holy Spirit, safe and secure on the wood of the Lord; and they do not let their ships wander over the seas on the wandering wave, but strive by the direction of their course to the harbour of salvation and the consummation of grace, so as to reach a faithful anchorage, where, dissolved, they can restore their course in the resurrection, where they cannot fear shipwreck.

Explanation 47, chapter 14

47.14.1CSEL 64:355

Et nos igitur circumspectemus hanc gratiam, speculatores eius simus, exploremus eam, ut fiant corpora nostra naues Tharsis. tunc enim caro ad seruitutem redigitur, cum ad dei intendimus gratiam, ut id quod amarum ad tempus sit, sicut est ieiunium, non quod dulce et uoluptarium sequamur. Tharsis ergo est speculatorium gratiae, intellegibilis ciuitas, ut Sion superior. ad eam festinabat Ionas. de ea dixit scriptura, quia sociatus est Iosaphat Oziae regi et sic placuit, ut facerent et irent ad eum naues in Tharsis.

Let us too, then, look about for this grace, let us be its watchmen, let us explore it, so that our bodies may become ships of Tarshish. For then the flesh is brought into servitude, when we attend to the grace of God, so that we follow what is bitter for a time, as fasting is, not what is sweet and pleasurable. Tarshish, then, is the watch-tower of grace, a spiritual city, like the higher Sion. To it Jonah was hastening. Of it Scripture said that Jehoshaphat joined with King Ahaziah and it pleased them to make ships to go to Tarshish.

47.14.2CSEL 64:355–356

sed quia impio se coniunxit, ideo missus est ad eum propheta, qui diceret ei: destruxit dominus opus tuum et contritae sunt naues tuae et non potuerunt ire in Tharsis. quo significatur, quod praeuaricantium mandatum dei corpora ad consummationem gratiae peruenire non possint. ad Salomonem autem, utpote sapientem et pacificum uirum, naues de Tharsis cum auro et argento et dentibus eburneis sine ulla

But because he joined himself to an ungodly man, a prophet was sent to him to say: “The Lord has destroyed your work, and your ships have been broken and could not go to Tarshish.” By this it is signified that the bodies of those who transgress the command of God cannot reach the consummation of grace. But to Solomon, as a wise and peaceable man, ships came from Tarshish with gold and silver and ivory without any

47.14.3CSEL 64:356

offensione ueniebant et eo ipse mittebat. habebat enim cum rege Hiram sacrae negotiationis spiritale commercium et mutuae gratiae concertantis affectum. has ergo naues hi, qui regali in se auctoritate potiuntur ad cohercendam ferociam corporalem, uidentes ex corruptibilibus incorruptas, ex maculosis summa gratiae luce fulgentes, ex dissolutis atque detritis esse renouatas, uiuere ex mortuis, ex sepultis resurgere celebri sermone commemorant.

mishap, and he himself sent there. For he had with King Hiram a spiritual traffic of sacred trade and an affection of mutual grace in rivalry. These ships, then, those who possess a royal authority in themselves to restrain bodily fierceness, seeing them made incorrupt from corruptible, shining with the highest light of grace from stained, renewed from dissolved and worn out, living from dead, rising from buried, commemorate in famous speech.

Explanation 47, chapter 15

47.15.1CSEL 64:356

Sicut audiuimus, ita et uidimus in ciuitate domini uirtutum, in ciuitate dei nostri; deus fundauit eam in aeternum. audiuimus extra ciuitatem, uidimus in ciuitate, cui deus est lumen aeternum, fulget dies sine sole mundano, luna non quaeritur; fundamentum eius non temporale, sed aeternum est.

“As we have heard, so have we seen in the city of the Lord of powers, in the city of our God; God has founded it for ever.” We heard outside the city, we saw in the city, for which God is eternal light; the day shines without the sun of this world, the moon is not sought; its foundation is not temporal but eternal.

Explanation 47, chapter 16

47.16.1CSEL 64:356

Suscepimus, inquit, deus, misericordiam tuam in medio templi tui. si ad filium dei dicitur, templum ita intellegimus, secundum quod ipse de corpore suo dixit: soluite templum hoc, et in triduo resuscitabo illud. uere templum dei corpus est Christi, in quo est nostrorum purificatio peccatorum. uere templum dei caro illa, in qua nullum

“We have received, O God,” he says, “your mercy in the midst of your temple.” If it is said to the Son of God, we understand the temple according to what he himself said of his body: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” Truly the temple of God is the body of Christ, in which is the purification of our sins. Truly the temple of God is that flesh, in which no

47.16.2CSEL 64:356–357

peccati potuit esse contagium, sed ipsa pro delicto mundi totius fuit sacrificium. uere templum dei caro illa, in qua dei imago fulgebat, corporaliter plenitudo diuinitatis habitabat, quoniam ipse Christus est plenitudo. ergo ad ipsum dicitur: suscepimus, deus, misericordiam tuam in medio templi tui. quod quid est, nisi quod ait: medius uestrum stat quem uos nescitis, hoc est: in medio uestri est et non uidetur? si autem ad patrem refertur, quid est in medio templi tui, nisi quia deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi?

contagion of sin could be, but which itself was the sacrifice for the offence of the whole world. Truly the temple of God is that flesh, in which the image of God shone and the fullness of the Godhead dwelt bodily, since Christ himself is the fullness. So it is said to him: “We have received, O God, your mercy in the midst of your temple.” What does this mean, unless what he says: “There stands in the midst of you one whom you do not know”, that is: he is in your midst and is not seen? But if it is referred to the Father, what is “in the midst of your temple”, unless that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself?

Explanation 47, chapter 17

47.17.1CSEL 64:357

In illo ergo templo suscepimus, inquit, misericordiam tuam, hoc est uerbum quod caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. sicut enim redemptio Christus, ita et misericordia. quae autem maior misericordia quam quod pro nostris flagitiis se praebuit immolandum, ut sanguine suo mundum lauaret, cuius peccatum nullo alio modo potuisset aboleri? etenim si de sanctis uiris apostolus dixit: templum dei uos estis et spiritus sanctus habitat in uobis, quanto magis carnem domini Iesu templum dei dixerim, qui semper plenus spiritu sancto legitur et ipse testificatur dicens: sentio de me uirtutem exisse, quae uirtus omnium uulnera acerba sanabat!

In that temple, then, he says, we have received your mercy, that is, the Word which became flesh and dwelt among us. For as Christ is redemption, so too he is mercy. And what greater mercy than that he offered himself to be sacrificed for our crimes, to wash the world with his blood, whose sin could have been abolished in no other way? For if the apostle said of holy men: “You are the temple of God, and the Holy Spirit dwells in you”, how much more should I call the flesh of the Lord Jesus the temple of God, who is always read to be full of the Holy Spirit and himself testifies, saying: “I perceive that power has gone out from me”, the power which healed the bitter wounds of all!

47.17.2CSEL 64:357

potest et illud intellegi, quod dixit suscepisse se cum populo misericordiam dei in medio templi eius, quoniam ipse ecclesiam suam fundauit et propagauit In aeternum, quoniam uere ipse cum filio suo unigenito hanc gratiam plebi suae contulit, quem aedificatorem etiam demonstrauit dicens: hic aedificabit mihi ciuitatem, quae diffusa toto orbe terrarum fecit, ut tota terra plena laudis eius esset et nominis. sicut enim scriptum est:

That too can be understood: that he said he had received with the people the mercy of God in the midst of his temple, since he himself founded his church and spread it for ever, since truly he himself with his only-begotten Son bestowed this grace on his people, whom he also showed to be the builder, saying: “He will build me a city”, which, spread over the whole world, brought it about that the whole earth was full of his praise and name. For as it is written:

47.17.3CSEL 64:357

laudis eius plena est terra, ita scriptum est: datum est ei nomen super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu curuet caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum et omnis lingua confiteatur, quod dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris.

“The earth is full of his praise”, so it is written: “A name was given him above every name, that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father.”

Explanation 47, chapter 18

47.18.1CSEL 64:357–358

Unde proprie dixit propheta: secundum nomen tuum, deus, ita et laus tua in fines terrae; iustitia tua plena est dextera tua. non mirum est, si plenus est iustitiae dei qui est dextera dei. idem autem est uirtus dei et iustitia dei, ut et secundum id, quod iustitiae dei plenus est, eam iustitiae plenitudinem in eo esse, quam pater habet, noueris et secundum id, quod uirtus et iustitia dei patris et sapientia legitur, nihil in eo diuinae maiestatis intellegas esse diuisum, sed omnia accepisse a patre filium et omnis gloriae paternae filium splendorem esse cognoscas et eius characterem substantiae, qui ita expressit patrem, ut in eo totus sit pater, sicut in patre totus est filius.

Hence the prophet properly said: “According to your name, O God, so too is your praise to the ends of the earth; your right hand is full of righteousness.” It is no wonder if he is full of the righteousness of God who is the right hand of God. And the power of God and the righteousness of God are the same, so that, according as he is full of the righteousness of God, you may know that the fullness of righteousness is in him which the Father has, and, according as he is read to be the power and righteousness and wisdom of God the Father, you may understand that nothing of the divine majesty in him is divided, but know that the Son received all things from the Father and is the brightness of all the Father’s glory and the stamp of his substance, who so expressed the Father that the whole Father is in him, as the whole Son is in the Father.

Explanation 47, chapter 19

47.19.1CSEL 64:358

Et quia uidit in spiritu propheta laudes Christi terris in omnibus praedicandas, uelut epilogo quodam faciens suscepti sermonis excessum ad laetitiam nos et cultura nominis eius hortatur dicens: laetetur mons Sion, id est qui confidunt in domino, sicut ipse postea interpretatus est dicens:

And since the prophet saw in the Spirit that the praises of Christ were to be proclaimed in all lands, as though making, in a kind of epilogue, a digression from the discourse he had undertaken, he urges us to gladness and the worship of his name, saying: “Let Mount Sion be glad”, that is, those who trust in the Lord, as he himself afterwards interpreted it, saying:

47.19.2CSEL 64:358

qui confidunt in domino sicut mons Sion et cetera. ipse dominus Iesus, qui est mons et altitudo ecclesiae suae, quae Christum suum toto speculatur affectu, laetetur fide eius et deuotione quae complacuit deo, quoniam repudiata est infidelis. potest igitur et hoc pie intellegi, quoniam etiam superior omnibus ipse est mons, in quem ascendere iubetur qui fidem praedicat dicente scriptura: in montem excelsum ascende, qui euangelizas Sion.

“Those who trust in the Lord are like Mount Sion”, and the rest. The Lord Jesus himself, who is the mountain and height of his church, which watches for its Christ with all its affection, let it be glad in his faith and devotion, which has pleased God, since the faithless one has been rejected. This too can then be piously understood: that he himself, higher than all, is the mountain onto which he who preaches the faith is commanded to go up, Scripture saying: “Go up onto a high mountain, you who bring good news to Sion.”

Explanation 47, chapter 20

47.20.1CSEL 64:358

Exultent, inquit, animae confitentes tibi. ipsae sunt filiae Iudaeae illius in qua notus est deus. nam ista Iudaea, quae in carne uel littera, non agnouit dominum; nam si agnouisset, etiam recepisset. sed non agnouit quem non recepit et iudicia eius refugit,

“Let the souls,” he says, “that confess you exult.” These are the daughters of that Judea in which God is known. For this Judea, which is in the flesh or the letter, did not acknowledge the Lord; for if it had acknowledged him, it would also have received him. But it did not acknowledge whom it did not receive, and it fled his judgments,

47.20.2CSEL 64:358–359

quibus eos non ex patre Abraham, sed ex diaboli semine manare memorabat, quoniam omne peccatum semen inimici est. confessionis autem filiae peccatum non faciunt, sed obumbrant, et ideo beati quorum tecta sunt peccata. meritoque exultabunt filiae confessionis propter iudicia domini, cum cognouerint iudicia eius et uias eius, quae in hoc saeculo inscrutabilia et inuestigabilia sunt hominibus; sed cum facie ad faciem spectare coeperint ueritatem, tunc quae nunc uidentur inscrutabilia comprehendent et eorum cognitione gaudebunt.

by which he declared that they came not from father Abraham but from the seed of the devil, since every sin is the seed of the enemy. But the daughters of confession do not commit sin, but cover it, and therefore blessed are those whose sins are covered. And rightly the daughters of confession will exult because of the judgments of the Lord, when they know his judgments and his ways, which in this world are unsearchable and inscrutable to men; but when they begin to behold the truth face to face, then they will comprehend what now seems unsearchable and rejoice in the knowledge of it.

Explanation 47, chapter 21

47.21.1CSEL 64:359

Circumdate, inquit, Sion et complectimini eam; narrate in turribus eius. qui intellegunt Sion, circumdant eam et complectuntur suis sensibus, ut teneant et non dimittant eam, ne sibi speculatoria disciplina uirtutis possit auferri. ideoque illa in Canticis dicit: tenui eum et non dimittam eum, quae dei sapientiam requirebat et complectebatur iustitiam dei brachiis caritatis et quibusdam fidei et deuotionis lacertis; ipse est enim piae mentis amplexus.

“Go round Sion,” he says, “and embrace her; tell it in her towers.” Those who understand Sion go round her and embrace her with their minds, so as to hold her and not let her go, lest the watchful discipline of virtue be taken from them. And therefore she says in the Song: “I held him and will not let him go”, she who sought the wisdom of God and embraced the righteousness of God with the arms of love and with certain shoulders of faith and devotion; for he is the embrace of a devout mind.

47.21.2CSEL 64:359

comprehendamus ergo et nos, quantum possumus, interna mysteria ueritatis et scribamus ea atque affigamus ea sensibus nostris uirtutemque caelestis oraculi, quam ut assequeretur Moyses ille peritus in omni sapientia Aegyptiorum in montem ascendit atque in nubem intrauit, ut operta et occulta cognosceret, adhaerente sibi socio Iesu, quia nemo sine uero Iesu potest incerta sapientiae et occulta comprehendere. et ideo in specie Iesu Naue ueri saluatoris ei significabatur adspiratura praesentia, per quem fierent omnes docibiles dei, qui legem aperiret, euangelium reuelaret.

Let us too, then, grasp as far as we can the inner mysteries of truth, and write them and fix them in our minds, and the power of the heavenly oracle, to attain which Moses, skilled in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, went up the mountain and entered the cloud, so as to know covered and hidden things, with Jesus clinging to him as companion, because no one can grasp the uncertain and hidden things of wisdom without the true Jesus. And therefore in the figure of Jesus son of Nave the coming presence of the true Saviour was signified to him, through whom all would be taught by God, who would open the law and reveal the gospel.

Explanation 47, chapter 22

47.22.1CSEL 64:359

Ergo qui Sion circumdederint prudentia sua et complexi fuerint intellectu, ascendentes super turres eius narrant desuper ei, qui non potuerit ascendere in turres eius, quid agendum uel quid cauendum sit. murata est enim ciuitas dei ideoque alibi dicit dominus: ecce ego, Hierusalem, pinxi muros tuos; distincta est turribus, de quibus insidiator possit, si appropinquare coeperit; deprehendi.

So those who have gone round Sion with their prudence and embraced her with their understanding, going up on her towers, tell from above to him who could not go up her towers what is to be done or what avoided. For the city of God is walled, and therefore the Lord says elsewhere: “See, Jerusalem, I have painted your walls”; it is marked out with towers, from which the plotter can be detected if he begins to approach.

47.22.2CSEL 64:359–360

habet ille exercitus suos quibus animas dei obsidere consueuit, admouere machinas, ut possit turres expugnare munitas. sed uos, inquit, praedicate de turribus; est enim in turribus Hierusalem abundantia. praedicate iustitiam, monete custodiam; sapientia enim in exitu canitur et in murorum altissimis praedicatur, et alibi iterum dicit: in

He has his armies, with which he is accustomed to besiege the souls of God, to bring up siege engines so as to storm the fortified towers. But you, he says, preach from the towers; for in the towers of Jerusalem there is abundance. Preach righteousness, warn to keep watch; for wisdom is sung at the going out and preached on the highest walls; and elsewhere again he says: “On

47.22.3CSEL 64:360

muris tuis constitui custodes diebus ac noctibus, in finem non tacebunt. narrate ergo sine intermissione, sine fine. aduersarius uigilat, circuit et rabie ferina quaerit quos inuenerit deuorare. ideo semper canendus est dominus, qui dentes leonum conterat et ora confringat, ut nobis nocere non possint.

your walls I have set watchmen day and night; to the end they will not be silent.” Tell it, then, without ceasing, without end. The adversary keeps watch, goes about and with savage rage seeks whom he may find to devour. Therefore the Lord is always to be sung, who crushes the teeth of lions and breaks their mouths, so that they cannot harm us.

Explanation 47, chapter 23

47.23.1CSEL 64:360

Ponite, inquit, corda uestra in uirtute eius, id est ut uirtutem eius intellegatis, et distribuite gradus eius, ut enarretis in progeniem alteram, quoniam hic est deus noster in aeternum et in saeculum saeculi. ipse reget nos in saecula. βάρεις dicit Graecus, hoc est excelsas et turritas domos.

“Set,” he says, “your hearts on his power”, that is, so that you understand his power, “and distribute her steps, so that you may tell it to another generation, for this is our God for ever and for ages of ages. He will rule us for ever.” The Greek says bareis, that is, lofty and towered houses.

47.23.2CSEL 64:360

unde propheta, cum de ciuitate dei et inhabitantibus eam loqueretur, distribuite, inquit, gradus eius, hoc est mansiones eius altas atque sublimes in caelestibus, quo docet ordinem seruandum esse meritorum; unusquisque enim in suo ordine. unde et dominus ire et praeparare se dicit discipulis mansiones, ut pro suorum ratione meritorum digna unusquisque habitacula consequatur, in quibus requiem illam carpat aeternam.

Hence the prophet, speaking of the city of God and those who dwell in it, says: “Distribute her steps”, that is, her high and lofty dwellings in heaven, by which he teaches that the order of merits is to be kept; for each in his own order. Hence the Lord too says that he goes to prepare dwellings for his disciples, so that each may obtain worthy dwellings according to the measure of his merits, in which to enjoy that eternal rest.

Explanation 47, chapter 24

47.24.1CSEL 64:360–361

Sunt etiam sublimia et alta praecepta, in quibus sunt occulta pietatis mysteria et theoremata sermonum caelestium. haec, inquit, distribuite et pro captu uniuscuiusque diuidite, quantum possit unusquisque ingenio proprio comprehendere. neque enim omnibus Paulus eadem disputabat. aliis nihil praedicabat nisi Christum Iesum et hunc crucifixum, non in persuasione sapientiae uerbi, sed in ostensione spiritus atque uirtutis; inter perfectos autem sapientiam loquebatur, quia non capiebat uniuersus populus percipere sapientiam in mysterio quae abscondita est.

There are also lofty and high precepts, in which are the hidden mysteries of piety and the theorems of the heavenly sayings. These, he says, distribute, and divide according to each one’s capacity, as much as each can grasp by his own mind. For Paul did not discuss the same things with everyone. To some he preached nothing but Christ Jesus and him crucified, not in the persuasion of wisdom of word but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power; but among the perfect he spoke wisdom, because the whole people could not take in the wisdom hidden in mystery.

Explanation 47, chapter 25

47.25.1CSEL 64:361

Ideo eam Christus abscondit, ut eam stulti non intellegant, prudentes studiosius quaerant et enarrent in progeniem alteram, quae spiritus foret uirtute perfectior, quoniam generatio superior infirmitate fidei perfectae sapientiae cognoscere sacramenta non potuit et ideo signum quaerebat, ueritatem repudiabat, cum utique non ueritas signi, sed signum ueritatis sit.

Therefore Christ hid it, so that fools might not understand it, the prudent might seek it more zealously and tell it to another generation, which would be more perfect by the power of the Spirit; since the former generation, through weakness of faith, could not know the mysteries of perfect wisdom, and therefore sought a sign and rejected the truth, though surely truth is not of the sign, but the sign is of the truth.

47.25.2CSEL 64:361

unde respondit ei dominus: generatio nequam et adultera signum quaerit, et signum non dabitur ei nisi Ionae prophetae. ad arguendam itaque perfidiam Iudaeorum Ionae exemplum accersitur, eo quod Nineuitae signo crediderunt et praedicationem Ionae, qui fuerat in utero ceti, sequendam putarunt, Iudaei autem nec post resurrectionem domini Iesu crediderunt, qui de corde terrae post triduum resurrexit et uiuit ac regnat per omnia saecula. amen.

Hence the Lord answered it: “An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign, and no sign will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.” To refute the faithlessness of the Jews, then, the example of Jonah is brought in, because the Ninevites believed the sign and thought the preaching of Jonah, who had been in the belly of the whale, should be followed, but the Jews did not believe even after the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, who rose from the heart of the earth after three days and lives and reigns for all ages. Amen.

Explanation 48, chapter 1

48.1.1CSEL 64:361–362

Audite haec, omnes gentes, auribus percipite, omnes qui habitatis orbem terrae, in principio ipso uocem domini salutaris agnoscimus gentes uocantis ad ecclesiam, ut errori renuntient, ueritatem sequantur et pii cultus munus agnoscant. sed quia serpentis uenenis infecta erant corda successionis humanae et peccatis obnoxia conscientia, dum desperat ueniam, se reuocare non poterat, remedium pollicetur, indulgentiam sponte pietatis suae largitate promittit, ut reus non timeat, bene conscius gratuletur, quod bono domino exhibeat ministerium seruitutis, qui nouerit peccata donare, honorare uirtutes.

“Hear these things, all nations; give ear, all you who inhabit the world.” In the very beginning we recognize the voice of the saving Lord calling the nations to the church, so that they may renounce error, follow the truth and recognize the gift of pious worship. But because the hearts of human descendants were infected with the serpent’s poison and the conscience, liable to sins, could not call itself back while it despaired of pardon, he promises a remedy and of his own accord, by the generosity of his kindness, promises indulgence, so that the guilty may not fear, and the one with a good conscience may rejoice that he renders the service of slavery to a good Lord, who knows how to forgive sins and honour virtues.

48.1.2CSEL 64:362

denique eadem serie uocationis etiam in euangelio nos dominus adhortatur dicens: uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quia mitis sum et humilis corde. deinde iugum suum suaue et onus leue esse commemorat, quoniam qui desperauerit medicinam sanus esse non poterit. et ideo omnibus grata est mansuetudo, quae uulnera interiorum curat animorum.

Finally, in the same pattern of calling the Lord also exhorts us in the gospel, saying: “Come to me, all you who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart.” Then he recalls that his yoke is sweet and his burden light, since he who despairs of medicine cannot be healed. And therefore gentleness is welcome to all, which heals the wounds of inner souls.

Explanation 48, chapter 2

48.2.1CSEL 64:362

Uenturus igitur ad aegrotos, uenturus ut medicus, qui grauia ulcera nostra curaret, medicamenta proponit, ut audiant homines et ad remedium salutis fida sedulitate concurrant. sic illa in euangelio meruit sanitatem, quae profluuio per duodecim annos sanguinis laborabat. audiuit medicum uenisse, festinauit contingere dicens: si tetigero fimbriam eius, salua ero.

So, about to come to the sick, about to come as a physician to heal our grave ulcers, he sets out medicines, so that men may hear and run together with faithful diligence to the remedy of salvation. So that woman in the gospel who for twelve years suffered from a flow of blood was found worthy of health. She heard that the physician had come and hastened to touch him, saying: “If I touch the fringe of his garment, I shall be well.”

48.2.2CSEL 64:362

intra se hoc dixit et Christus audiuit, et tetigit fimbriam et uirtus de saluatore processit quae curauit aegram, firmauit inualidam, profluuium statuit, pietatem probauit. similiter ergo et hic omnes gentes uocat ad sapientiae fontem atque prudentiae, redemptionem omnibus pollicetur, ut nemo trepidet, nemo desperet, ubi nullus excipitur, sed omnis anima inuitatur ad gratiam, ut sine pretio redimatur a crimine et fructum uitae adipiscatur aeternae.

She said this within herself, and Christ heard; she touched the fringe, and power went out from the Saviour, which healed the sick woman, strengthened the weak, stopped the flow, proved her piety. So likewise here too he calls all nations to the fountain of wisdom and prudence; he promises redemption to all, so that no one may tremble, no one despair, where no one is excepted, but every soul is invited to grace, to be redeemed from crime without price and to obtain the fruit of eternal life.

Explanation 48, chapter 3

48.3.1CSEL 64:362–363

Hic sensus est psalmi, quem suo ordine digeremus, cum explicauerimus superiorum uim qualitatemque uerborum. praecipiuntur enim audire gentes et auribus percipere qui inhabitant orbem terrae, illum utique orbem terrarum, de quo supra dixit: domini est terra et plenitudo eius, orbis terrarum et qui habitant in eo. ipse super maria fundauit eum et super flumina praeparauit eum.

This is the sense of the psalm, which we shall set out in its order when we have explained the force and nature of the preceding words. For the nations are commanded to hear, and those who inhabit the world to give ear — that world, surely, of which he said above: “The earth is the Lord’s and its fullness, the world and those who dwell in it. He has founded it upon the seas and prepared it upon the rivers.”

48.3.2CSEL 64:363

quem Graeci οἰκουμένην dicunt, eo quod inhabitetur a Christo, sicut ipse dixit: quoniam inhabitabo in illis; inhabitat enim, ut impleat quae uacua uidebantur. quae est ergo οἰκουμένη nisi sancta ecclesia, templum dei et habitaculum Christi? nec incongrue Latini dissono quidem sermone, sed pari sensu orbem terrae nuncupauerunt, eo quod uita sanctorum, qui inhabitantur ab spiritu, sicut rota in orbem sine ulla cursus sui offensione uoluatur.

The Greeks call it oikoumenē, because it is inhabited by Christ, as he himself said: “For I will dwell in them”; for he dwells so as to fill what seemed empty. What, then, is the oikoumenē but the holy church, the temple of God and the dwelling of Christ? Nor unfittingly did the Latins, in different words but with equal sense, name it orbis terrae, because the life of the saints, who are inhabited by the Spirit, rolls like a wheel in a circle without any stumbling in its course.

Explanation 48, chapter 4

48.4.1CSEL 64:363

In tribulationibus igitur fundatur ecclesia, in tempestatibus et procellis, in sollicitudinibus et maerore, in rebus aduersis et in fluminibus praeparatur. in quibus fluminibus, audi dicentem: eleuauerunt flumina uocem suam. audi et in euangelio: qui credit in me, sicut dixit scriptura, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. hoc autem dicebat de spiritu quem accipiebant credentes in eum.

The church, then, is founded in tribulations, in storms and gales, in anxieties and grief, in adversities, and is prepared in rivers. In which rivers, hear him saying: “The rivers have lifted up their voice.” Hear too in the gospel: “He who believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from his belly.” He said this of the Spirit which those who believed in him were to receive.

48.4.2CSEL 64:363

in his ergo fluminibus praeparatur ecclesia, in quibus profluit dei gratia. hi sunt fluuii qui aure percipiunt uerbum dei et locuntur, ut uerbum infundant pectoribus singulorum. ideoque scriptura discretionem fecit dicendo: audite haec, omnes gentes, auribus percipite, omnes qui habitatis orbem terrae. possunt omnes audire, non omnes tamen auribus percipere nisi electi dei. ideoque saluator dicit: qui habet aures audiendi audiat.

In these rivers, then, the church is prepared, in which the grace of God flows. These are the rivers which take in the word of God by the ear and speak, so as to pour the word into the hearts of each. And therefore Scripture made a distinction, saying: “Hear these things, all nations; give ear, all you who inhabit the world.” All can hear, yet not all give ear except the elect of God. And therefore the Saviour says: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

48.4.3CSEL 64:363–364

illas aures dicit interioris hominis spiritales, cuius et nares legimus dicente Iob: spiritus diuinus qui est in naribus meis. non omnes homines has aures et has nares habent; alia est enim forma corporis, alia gratiae spiritalis. qui spiritalis est audit omnia, diiudicat omnia, animalis autem homo non percipit quae sunt spiritus dei; hic enim terrigena est, ille caelestis.

He means those spiritual ears of the inner man, whose nostrils too we read of, Job saying: “The divine Spirit which is in my nostrils.” Not all men have these ears and these nostrils; for the form of the body is one thing, that of spiritual grace another. He who is spiritual hears all things and judges all things, but the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God; for this one is earth-born, that one heavenly.

Explanation 48, chapter 5

48.5.1CSEL 64:364

Ideoque addidit: quique terrigenae et filii hominum, simul in unum diues et pauper, ut uniuersos uocaret. quis est terrigena nisi filius hominis? quis est spiritalis nisi dei filius? ille ex sanguine concretus et ex carnis et uiri uoluptate generatus, iste ex deo natus; alius diues in omni uerbo

And therefore he added: “Both earth-born and sons of men, rich and poor together in one”, so as to call all. Who is earth-born but the son of man? Who is spiritual but the son of God? The one formed from blood and born of the pleasure of flesh and of a man, the other born of God; one rich in every word

48.5.2CSEL 64:364

et scientia, alius pauper, gratia tamen diues, quia et pauper clamauit et dominus exaudiuit eum. e contrario est et diues in superbia et pauper in humilitate. omnes uocantur ad ecclesiam, ut omnes redimantur a Christo. qui aeger est medicum inuenit, qui sanus sapientiam adquirit, captiuus redemptorem, liber remuneratorem. omnes aedificat scriptura diuina;

and knowledge, another poor yet rich in grace, because the poor man too cried out and the Lord heard him. On the other hand there is also the rich in pride and the poor in humility. All are called to the church, so that all may be redeemed by Christ. The sick man finds a physician, the healthy acquires wisdom, the captive a redeemer, the free a rewarder. Divine Scripture builds up all;

48.5.3CSEL 64:364

in ea inuenit unusquisque, quo aut uulnera sua curet aut merita confirmet. simul autem in unum diuitis et pauperis facta uocatio in quandam humilitatem aequalitatemque nos prouocat, ut neque diues fastidiat inopem neque diuiti pauper inuideat, sed utrumque sibi gratia una conectat, quia et dominus pauper factus est cum diues esset, ut idem et pauperum saluator esset et diuitum.

in it each one finds that by which to heal his wounds or confirm his merits. And the call of rich and poor together into one calls us to a certain humility and equality, so that neither the rich man disdains the needy nor the poor man envies the rich, but one grace joins both to itself, because the Lord too became poor though he was rich, so that he might be the Saviour both of the poor and of the rich.

Explanation 48, chapter 6

48.6.1CSEL 64:364–365

Et subtexuit: os meum loquetur sapientiam et meditatio cordis mei prudentiam. merito omnes uocantur, quia omnibus sapientiae fons abundat, nec thesauro pecuniario comparatur quae pretiosior thesauris omnibus declaratur. ideoque nec diues auertitur nec pauper excluditur, quia sapientia non facultates discriminat, sed uoluntates; ille aptior, qui prior affectu et proximus disciplina. quodsi meditatio cordis prudentiam loquitur, quanto magis perfecta doctrina! deinde ammonemur non tumultuarium proferre sermonem, sed exercitio quodam meditationis et statera mentis internae examinare dicenda, quia scriptum est alibi: statera fallax non bonum,

And he added: “My mouth will speak wisdom, and the meditation of my heart prudence.” Rightly all are called, because the fountain of wisdom abounds for all, and it is not compared to a treasure of money, being declared more precious than all treasures. And therefore neither is the rich turned away nor the poor shut out, because wisdom distinguishes not resources but wills; that one is fitter who is first in affection and nearest in discipline. But if the meditation of the heart speaks prudence, how much more perfect teaching! Then we are warned not to bring forth a hasty speech, but to examine what is to be said by a kind of exercise of meditation and the balance of the inner mind, because it is written elsewhere: “A false balance is not good.”

Explanation 48, chapter 7

48.7.1CSEL 64:365

Inclinabo ad parabolam aurem meam, aperiam in psalterio propositionem meam. sapiens auditor intendit atque inclinat aurem suam, ut intellegat parabolarum figuras. ipsum aurem suam dicit saluator qui aurem habet audiendi. aperit etiam dominus clausam propositionem suam, cum aptum organum sibi et uas electionis inuenerit, quod psalterium uocat, cuius similis Paulus dulcis gratiae cantilenam neruis omnibus sibi concinentibus resultauit, sancti spiritus plectro interiorem chordam exterioremque pulsando, ut et lingua oraret et mente.

“I will incline my ear to a parable; I will open my proposition on the psaltery.” The wise hearer attends and inclines his ear, so as to understand the figures of parables. The Saviour calls him his ear who has an ear to hear. The Lord also opens his closed proposition when he has found a fit instrument and chosen vessel for himself, which he calls a psaltery; like this, Paul sounded out the song of sweet grace with all his strings in concord, striking the inner and the outer string with the plectrum of the Holy Spirit, so as to pray both with the tongue and with the mind.

48.7.2CSEL 64:365

ideoque ait: orabo spiritu, orabo et mente; psallam spiritu, psallam et mente. huiusmodi ergo uirum Christus multo ante promittit, per quem manifestaret abscondita et inuoluta prophetici obscuritate sermonis aperiret. bonum psalterium, cum fidei uita consentit et caro animae, uirtuti adspirat uoluntas. hoc est dulce psalterium, ubi canora est disciplina uiuendi, ut impleatur illud quod scriptum est: clara erit lingua mutorum.

And therefore he says: “I will pray with the spirit, I will pray with the mind also; I will sing psalms with the spirit, I will sing psalms with the mind also.” Such a man, then, Christ promises long before, through whom he would make plain hidden things and open what was wrapped in the obscurity of prophetic speech. A good psaltery, when life agrees with faith and the flesh with the soul, and the will breathes in harmony with virtue. This is a sweet psaltery, where the discipline of living is melodious, so that what is written is fulfilled: “Clear will be the tongue of the dumb.”

Explanation 48, chapter 8

48.8.1CSEL 64:365

Sequitur: ut quid timebo in die mala? iniquitas calcanei mei circumdabit me, hoc est: cum os meum loquatur sapientiam et meditatio cordis mei prudentiam, in die iudicii timere quid possum, nisi forte calcanei mei iniquitas mihi sit abluenda? alia est iniquitas nostra, alia calcanei nostri, in quo Adam dente serpentis est uulneratus et obnoxiam hereditatem successionis humanae suo uulneri dereliquit, ut omnes illo uulnere claudicemus.

There follows: “Why shall I fear in the evil day? The iniquity of my heel will surround me”, that is: since my mouth speaks wisdom and the meditation of my heart prudence, what can I fear in the day of judgment, unless perhaps the iniquity of my heel must be washed from me? Our iniquity is one thing, the iniquity of our heel another, in which Adam was wounded by the serpent’s tooth and left a liable inheritance to human descendants by his wound, so that we all limp from that wound.

48.8.2CSEL 64:365–366

unde dominus discipulis pedes lauit, ut lauaret uenena serpentis, et Petrus reprehenditur, quod excusabat, ne sibi dominus pedes lauaret. ideoque dictum est ei: nisi lauero tibi pedes, non habebis mecum partem. quo audito non solum pedes, sed etiam manus obtulit abluendas. cui dominus respondit: qui lotus est non habet necesse ut iterum lauet nisi ut pedes lauet, sed est mundus totus.

Hence the Lord washed his disciples’ feet, so as to wash away the serpent’s poisons, and Peter is rebuked for excusing himself, lest the Lord should wash his feet. And therefore it was said to him: “Unless I wash your feet, you will have no part with me.” Hearing this, he offered not only his feet but also his hands to be washed. To him the Lord answered: “He who has been washed has no need to wash again, except to wash his feet, but is clean all over.”

Explanation 48, chapter 9

48.9.1CSEL 64:366

Ergo Dauid dicit: iniquitates meae superposuerunt caput meum, qui nouerat in iniquitate esse conceptum et in delictis a matre generatum. dominus autem, qui sua peccata non habuit nec cognouit proprias iniquitates, ait: iniquitas calcanei mei circumdabit me, hoc est iniquitas Adae, non mea. sed ea non potest mihi esse terrori; in die enim iudicii nostra in nobis, non alienae iniquitatis flagitia puniuntur.

So David says: “My iniquities have gone over my head”, he who knew that he was conceived in iniquity and born of his mother in offences. But the Lord, who had no sins of his own nor knew iniquities of his own, says: “The iniquity of my heel will surround me”, that is, the iniquity of Adam, not mine. But that cannot be a terror to me; for in the day of judgment our own crimes in us, not another’s iniquities, are punished.

48.9.2CSEL 64:366

unde reor iniquitatem calcanei magis lubricum delinquendi quam reatum aliquem nostri esse delicti. meritoque dominus, qui pro nobis uniuersa suscepit, lauemus, inquit, et pedes, ut calcanei lubricum possimus auferre, quo fida statio possit esse uirtutum nec paterno quis errore labatur, qui suo paratus est stare proposito, non metuat lubricum hereditatis, qui cupit uestigium tenere uirtutis. iniquitas ergo calcanei nostri praeuaricatio est Adae, per quam prolapsus est in contemptum et dissimulationem caelestium mandatorum.

Hence I think that the iniquity of the heel is the slipperiness of sinning rather than any guilt of our own offence. And rightly the Lord, who took up all things for us, says: Let us wash the feet too, so that we may take away the slipperiness of the heel, so that there may be a faithful standing of virtues, and that no one may slip by his father’s error who is ready to stand by his own purpose, nor fear the slipperiness of inheritance who wishes to keep the footing of virtue. So the iniquity of our heel is the transgression of Adam, by which he slid into contempt and neglect of the heavenly commands.

Explanation 48, chapter 10

48.10.1CSEL 64:366–367

Est etiam iniquitas calcanei Iudae detestanda proditio. calcanei ideo, quia scriptum est: qui manducat meum panem leuauit super me calcaneum suum. bene et ibi suum et hic meum dixit: suum, quia Christus sine iniquitate, haec autem solius iniquitas proditoris; meum autem calcaneum quasi ultimum sui corporis ludam Christus appellat, cuius nos sumus corpus et membra.

There is also the detestable betrayal of Judas, the iniquity of the heel. “Of the heel”, because it is written: “He who eats my bread has lifted up his heel against me.” Rightly there he said “his” and here “my”: “his”, because Christ is without iniquity, and this was the iniquity of the traitor alone; but Christ calls Judas “my heel” as the last part of his body, whose body and members we are.

48.10.2CSEL 64:367

apostoli praestantiora et actuosa membra sunt Christi, ludas calcaneum, quasi extrema pars corporis serpenti obnoxia et patens uulneri. primum ergo calcaneum Adam, secundum calcaneum ludas; ille lapsus totius hereditatis, hic solius proditoris, qui hereditatem implicare non potuit, quia iam non carnales sumus, sed redemptoris hereditas scriptura dicente: est hereditas credentibus in domino.

The apostles are the more excellent and active members of Christ, Judas the heel, as the furthest part of the body, exposed to the serpent and open to wounding. So the first heel is Adam, the second heel Judas; the one the fall of the whole inheritance, the other of the traitor alone, who could not entangle the inheritance, because we are no longer carnal but the inheritance of the redeemer, Scripture saying: “There is an inheritance for those who believe in the Lord.”

Explanation 48, chapter 11

48.11.1CSEL 64:367

Est et illa iniquitas calcanei sui quae circumdedit Christum: circumdantes, inquit, circumdederunt me et in nomine domini ultus sum eos. calcaneum eius synagoga est, decor et gloria uultus eius ecclesia, sicut scriptum est: dominus regnauit, decorem induit.

There is also that iniquity of his heel which surrounded Christ: “Surrounding,” he says, “they surrounded me, and in the name of the Lord I took vengeance on them.” His heel is the synagogue; the beauty and glory of his countenance is the church, as it is written: “The Lord has reigned, he has put on beauty.”

Explanation 48, chapter 12

48.12.1CSEL 64:367

Illi ergo sunt calcaneum de quibus dicit: qui confidunt in uirtute sua quique in abundantia diuitiarum suarum gloriantur; diuites enim eguerunt et esurierunt. quod de Iudaeis dictum est; sed et omnes, qui luxuriose uiuunt et non tenent caput, calcaneum Christi sunt. sed haec generalia, quae late patent; ceterum specialiter de Iuda locutus est proditore, qui sibi ualidus et diues apostolatus gloria uidebatur.

They, then, are the heel, of whom he says: “Those who trust in their strength and glory in the abundance of their riches”; for “the rich have wanted and been hungry.” This was said of the Jews; but all too who live luxuriously and do not hold the head are the heel of Christ. But these are general things, which extend widely; but specially he spoke of Judas the traitor, who seemed to himself strong and rich in the glory of the apostleship.

Explanation 48, chapter 13

48.13.1CSEL 64:367

Denique de passione domini sermo contexitur: frater non redimet, redimet homo. nec dabit deo propitiationem suam et pretium redemptionis animae suae. hoc est: ut quid timebo in die mala? quid enim potest mihi nocere, qui non solum non indigeo redemptore, sed ipse omnium sum redemptor? alios liberos faciam, et pro me ipso ipse trepidabo?

Then the discourse is woven about the Lord’s passion: “A brother does not redeem; a man will redeem. Nor will he give to God his propitiation and the price of the redemption of his soul.” That is: “Why shall I fear in the evil day?” For what can harm me, who not only do not need a redeemer but am myself the redeemer of all? Shall I make others free, and myself tremble for myself?

48.13.2CSEL 64:367–368

ecce faciam noua omnia, qui supra ipsum germanitatis affectum sim atque pietatem. quem frater eodem matris utero effusus in lucem redimere non potest, quia parilis naturae infirmitate retinetur, redimet homo, sed ille homo de quo scriptum est, quia mittet illis dominus hominem qui saluabit eos, qui de se ipso dixit: quaerit me occidere, hominem qui ueritatem locutus sum uobis.

“See, I will make all things new”, I who am above even the affection of brotherhood and piety. The one whom a brother, poured into light from the same mother’s womb, cannot redeem, because he is held by the weakness of a like nature, a man will redeem — but that man of whom it is written that the Lord will send them a man who will save them, who said of himself: “You seek to kill me, a man who has spoken the truth to you.”

48.13.3CSEL 64:368

sed quamuis homo sit, quis cognoscet eum? quare nemo cognoscet? quia, sicut unus deus, ita unus mediator dei et hominum, homo Christus Iesus. ipse est solus qui redimet hominem, uincens pietate germanos, quia pro alienis sanguinem suum fudit, quem nemo potest offerre pro fratre. itaque corpori proprio non pepercit, ut nos redimeret a peccato, et dedit semet ipsum redemptionem pro omnibus, sicut uerus eius testis adseruit apostolus Paulus, qui ait:

But although he is a man, who will know him? Why will no one know him? Because, as there is one God, so there is one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus. He alone is the one who will redeem man, surpassing brothers in kindness, because he shed his blood for strangers, which no one can offer for a brother. And so he did not spare his own body, so as to redeem us from sin, and gave himself as a redemption for all, as his true witness the apostle Paul asserted, who says:

48.13.4CSEL 64:368

ueritatem dico, non mentior. sed quare solus hic redimet? quia nemo potest eum aequare pietate, ut pro seruulis suis animam suam ponat, nemo integritate; omnes enim sub peccato, omnes Adae illius subiacent prolapsioni, solus redemptor eligitur qui peccato ueteri obnoxius esse non possit. ergo per hominem dominum Iesum intellegamus, qui suscepit hominis condicionem, ut in carne sua peccatum omnium crucifigeret et chirographum uniuersorum suo cruore deleret.

“I speak the truth, I do not lie.” But why will this one alone redeem? Because no one can equal him in kindness, so as to lay down his life for his servants, no one in integrity; for all are under sin, all lie under the fall of that Adam; the redeemer alone is chosen who could not be liable to the old sin. So by “man” let us understand the Lord Jesus, who took on the condition of man, so as to crucify the sin of all in his flesh and blot out the handwriting of all with his blood.

Explanation 48, chapter 14

48.14.1CSEL 64:368–369

Sed forte dicas: quomodo redempturus frater negatur, cum ipse dixerit: narrabo nomen tuum fratribus meis? sed non quasi frater [nobis], sed quasi homo Christus Iesus, in quo deus erat, nobis peccata dimisit. sic enim scriptum est: deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi, in illo Christo Iesu, de quo solo dictum est, quia uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. non ergo quasi frater, sed quasi dominus habitauit in nobis, cum habitaret in carne. cum igitur reconciliauerit deo mundum, utique ipse reconciliatione non eguit; pro quo enim peccato suo propitiaret deum qui nulla peccata cognouit?

But perhaps you say: How is a brother denied to be the redeemer, when he himself said: “I will tell your name to my brothers”? But not as a brother, but as the man Christ Jesus, in whom God was, he forgave us our sins. For so it is written: “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself”, in that Christ Jesus of whom alone it was said: “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” So not as a brother but as Lord he dwelt among us, when he dwelt in the flesh. Since, then, he reconciled the world to God, surely he himself had no need of reconciliation; for for what sin of his own would he propitiate God, who knew no sin?

48.14.2CSEL 64:369

denique didragma poscentibus Iudaeis, quod pro peccato dabatur ex lege, dixit ad Petrum: Simon, reges terrae a quibus accipiunt tributum uel censum? a filiis suis aut ab alienis? respondit Petrus: ab alienis. cui dixit dominus: ergo liberi sunt filii. ut autem non faciamus illis offendiculum, mitte hamum et eum piscem qui primus ascenderit tolle, et aperto ore eius inuenies staterem; illum tollens dabis pro me et pro te.

Finally, when the Jews asked for the didrachma, which was given for sin according to the law, he said to Peter: “Simon, from whom do the kings of the earth receive tribute or tax? From their sons or from strangers?” Peter answered: “From strangers.” The Lord said to him: “Then the sons are free. But so that we may not give offence to them, cast a hook, and take the fish that first comes up, and when you open its mouth you will find a stater; take it and give it for me and for you.”

48.14.3CSEL 64:369

ostendit quod non pro se propitiationem debeat peccatorum, quia seruus peccati non erat, sed ab omni erat liber errore filius dei. filius enim liberat, seruus est in reatu. ergo liber iste ab omnibus nec pretium redemptionis animae suae dat, cuius sanguinis pretium poterat abundare ad uniuersa mundi totius redimenda peccata. recte ergo alios liberat qui pro se nihil debeat.

He showed that he did not owe propitiation for sins on his own account, because he was not a slave of sin, but the Son of God was free from all error. For the son frees; the slave is in guilt. So this one, free from all, does not give the price of the redemption of his soul, whose blood’s price could abound to redeem all the sins of the whole world. Rightly, then, does he free others who owes nothing for himself.

Explanation 48, chapter 15

48.15.1CSEL 64:369

Plus adicio. non solum pro se Christus pretium non debet suae redemptionis aut propitiationem pro peccato, sed etiam si de quocumque homine accipias, possit intellegi, quia non debeant singuli propitiationem suam, quia propitiatio omnium Christus est et ipse est uniuersorum redemptio. cuius enim hominis sanguis iam idoneus est ad redemptionem sui, cum pro redemptione omnium suum sanguinem Christus effuderit?

I add more. Not only does Christ not owe the price of his redemption or propitiation for sin for himself, but even if you take it of any man whatever, it can be understood that individuals do not owe their own propitiation, because Christ is the propitiation of all and he himself is the redemption of all. For whose blood is now fit for his own redemption, since Christ has shed his blood for the redemption of all?

48.15.2CSEL 64:369

est ergo cuiusquam sanguis qui Christi possit sanguini comparari? aut quis tam potens homo, qui pro se propitiationem suam dare possit supra eam propitiationem, quam in se optulit Christus, qui solus deo mundum reconciliauit per suum sanguinem? quae maior hostia, quod praestantius sacrificium, qui melior aduocatus quam qui pro peccatis omnium factus est deprecatio et animam suam dedit pro nobis redemptionem?

Is there, then, anyone’s blood that can be compared to the blood of Christ? Or what man is so powerful that he can give his propitiation for himself beyond that propitiation which Christ offered in himself, who alone reconciled the world to God through his blood? What greater victim, what more excellent sacrifice, what better advocate than he who became the intercession for the sins of all and gave his life as a ransom for us?

48.15.3CSEL 64:369–370

non quaeritur ergo propitiatio aut redemptio singulorum, quia omnium pretium sanguis est Christi quo nos redemit dominus Iesus, qui solus patrem reconciliauit et laborauit usque in finem, quia nostrum laborem ipse suscepit dicens: uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis, et ego uos reficiam. uide laborantem: laboraui clamans, raucae factae sunt fauces meae, et alibi: Isachar quod bonum est concupiuit, requiescens inter sortes, et infra:

So the propitiation or redemption of individuals is not sought, because the blood of Christ is the price of all, by which the Lord Jesus redeemed us, who alone reconciled the Father and laboured to the end, because he himself took up our labour, saying: “Come to me, all you who labour, and I will refresh you.” See him labouring: “I have laboured crying out; my throat has become hoarse”; and elsewhere: “Issachar desired what is good, resting between the lots”; and below:

48.15.4CSEL 64:370

supposuit humerum suum ad laborandum et factus est uir agricola. ergo non dabit homo iam propitiationem suam nec redemptionem, quia semel ablutus est a peccato per sanguinem Christi, laborabit tamen, ut seruet praecepta uiuendi et a mandatis caelestibus non recedat. dum uiuit, in labore sit et perseueret in eo, ut uiuat in finem, ne et ipse morte moriatur, cum sit iam redemptus a morte.

“He set his shoulder to labour and became a farmer.” So a man will no longer give his own propitiation or redemption, because he has once been washed from sin through the blood of Christ; yet he will labour to keep the precepts of living and not depart from the heavenly commands. While he lives, let him be in labour and persevere in it, so as to live to the end, lest he too die the death, when he has already been redeemed from death.

Explanation 48, chapter 16

48.16.1CSEL 64:370

Qui autem seruauerit mandata uitae, non uidebit interitum, cum uiderit mori eos qui sibi sapientissimi et prudentissimi in hoc saeculo uidebantur. quod specialiter ad scribas et Pharisaeos spectat, qui sibi cathedras in synagogis uindicant quasi sapientiae principatum. qui uere frustra laborant, cum putant, quia per didragmum liberentur, cum spiritale pretium animae suae atque illud singulare dominici corporis sacrificium inani quadam legis interpretatione contempserint refugientes baptismatis sacramentum. neminem enim sanguis redimit hircorum atque taurorum, sed omnes unus sanguis liberat Christi, cuius in Leuitico figura, non ueritas. non enim didragma, sed illius solius sanguinis pretio liberamur.

But he who keeps the commands of life will not see destruction, when he sees those die who seemed to themselves most wise and prudent in this world. This applies specially to the scribes and Pharisees, who claim for themselves the chairs in the synagogues as though the primacy of wisdom. They truly labour in vain, when they think that they are freed by the didrachma, since they have despised by an empty interpretation of the law the spiritual price of their soul and that unique sacrifice of the Lord’s body, fleeing the sacrament of baptism. For the blood of goats and bulls redeems no one, but the one blood of Christ frees all, of which there is a figure in Leviticus, not the truth. For we are freed not by the didrachma but by the price of that blood alone.

Explanation 48, chapter 17

48.17.1CSEL 64:370–371

Simus ergo docibiles dei, ut nemo nostrum uideat interitum in illo die, quando damnabuntur morte perpetua sapientes istius mundi uel principes Iudaeorum, quando simul insipiens et stultus peribunt. non idem est utrumque: stultus est qui nihil sapit et stulta intellegit, insipiens qui male sapit: dixit insipiens, quia non est deus; quomodo iniquus, non quia aequitatem nesciat, sed quia improbitate cordis sui iniqua committat, improbus quoque dicitur, eo quod probitatem malitia sua destruere uelit, non quia probitatem ignoret.

Let us be, then, taught by God, so that none of us may see destruction on that day when the wise of this world or the leaders of the Jews will be condemned to everlasting death, when the senseless and the fool will perish together. The two are not the same: the fool is one who knows nothing and understands foolish things, the senseless one who knows badly: “The senseless one has said: There is no God”; just as the unjust man is so called not because he does not know justice but because by the wickedness of his heart he commits unjust things; the wicked too is so called because by his malice he wishes to destroy uprightness, not because he does not know uprightness.

48.17.2CSEL 64:371

ipsi ergo insipiens et stultus quando pereunt, alienis relinquunt diuitias suas; suum enim et legitimum stultitiae et improbitatis heredem repperire non possunt. legitimi enim dicunt: quia filii dei sumus. si autem filii, et heredes; heredes quidem dei, coheredes autem Christi, si tamen compatimur, ut et simul glorificemur. insipientes ergo diuitias non habent, quia nec hereditatem habent.

So when the senseless and the fool perish, they leave their riches to strangers; for they cannot find a proper and lawful heir of folly and wickedness. For the lawful heirs say: “For we are sons of God. And if sons, also heirs; heirs indeed of God, fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with him, so that we may also be glorified with him.” The senseless, then, have no riches, because they have no inheritance.

48.17.3CSEL 64:371

non habent diuitias infidi, non possessionem; fideli enim totus mundus possessio est. non habent hereditatem, quia sola est hereditas credentibus in domino. suas autem diuitias habent, ideoque auarus dicit: non habeo quo congregem fructus meos; non enim uerus fructus, sed auari fructus pecunia est. et dominus auaro dicit: uade, uende bona tua et ueni, sequere me; non enim perfectum bonum est patrimonium, sed haec sunt auari bona, quae in emolumento aliquo constituta sunt.

The faithless have no riches, no possession; for to the faithful the whole world is a possession. They have no inheritance, because the inheritance belongs only to those who believe in the Lord. But they have their own riches, and therefore the greedy man says: “I have nowhere to gather my fruits”; for money is not true fruit but the fruit of the greedy. And the Lord says to the greedy man: “Go, sell your goods, and come, follow me”; for a patrimony is not the perfect good, but these are the goods of the greedy, which are set in some profit.

48.17.4CSEL 64:371–372

uende, inquit, quae putas tua esse, cum tua non sint, quia ad alios fluminis modo transeunt, et sequere me, ut bonum inmortale cognoscas. sapientes ergo in interitum deducuntur, quibus deus abscondit quae paruulis reuelauit. peribunt simul et in uno eodemque loco erunt insipiens et stultus et alienis relinquent diuitias suas, quia non inuenit nequitia legitimum successorem.

Sell, he says, what you think is yours, when it is not yours, because it passes to others like a river, and follow me, so that you may know the immortal good. So the wise are led into destruction, from whom God has hidden what he has revealed to little ones. The senseless and the fool will perish together and will be in one and the same place, and they will leave their riches to strangers, because wickedness does not find a lawful successor.

Explanation 48, chapter 18

48.18.1CSEL 64:372

Et sepulchra eorum domus eorum in saeculum, tabernacula eorum in progenie et generatione; inuocauerunt nomina eorum in terris ipsorum. ubique scriptura sepulchra pro uilibus ducit, quibus degeneres et uitae huius cupidi comparantur: sepulchrum patens est guttur eorum. his ergo, qui ad diem de die uiuunt, sepulchra pro domibus sunt. domus enim iustorum non in terra est, sed in caelo, sicut apostolus docuit dicens:

“And their tombs are their houses for ever, their dwellings in generation and generation; they have called their names in their lands.” Everywhere Scripture regards tombs as base things, to which the degenerate and those greedy for this life are compared: “Their throat is an open tomb.” For those, then, who live from day to day, tombs are in place of houses. For the house of the righteous is not on earth but in heaven, as the apostle taught, saying:

48.18.2CSEL 64:372

nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est. ipsa est domus nostra quae domus Christi est, unde ait scriptura: et Moyses quidem fidelis in tota domo eius tamquam famulus in testimonium eorum quae dicenda essent, Christus uero tamquam filius in domo sua. piis ergo domus ecclesia est, piis patria caelum est, ideoque iustus ait:

“But our citizenship is in heaven.” That is our house which is the house of Christ; hence Scripture says: “And Moses indeed was faithful in all his house as a servant, for a testimony of the things that were to be spoken, but Christ as a son in his own house.” For the devout, then, the house is the church, for the devout the homeland is heaven, and therefore the righteous man says:

48.18.3CSEL 64:372

aduena ego sum apud te in terra et peregrinus sicut omnes patres mei. luxuriosis domus sepulchrum est; denique tamquam in sepulchro uiuunt, qui possunt dicere: manducemus et bibamus, cras enim moriemur, resurrectionem ante oculos non habentes. ideoque tumulis suis affixi atque attumulati adhaerent, quia resuscitari se posse non crediderunt. habitaculum ergo illis in suo busto est et tabernaculum eorum in progenie et generatione terrena est, qui uermes sui corporis heredes relinquunt, ut hic tantum sit memoria eorum, in aeternum transire non possit.

“I am a stranger with you on earth and a sojourner, like all my fathers.” For the luxurious the house is a tomb; indeed they live as in a tomb, who can say: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die”, not having the resurrection before their eyes. And therefore they cling, fixed and entombed, to their tombs, because they did not believe that they could be raised. So their dwelling is in their own grave, and their tabernacle is in an earthly generation and lineage, who leave worms as heirs of their body, so that their memory is only here and cannot pass into eternity.

Explanation 48, chapter 19

48.19.1CSEL 64:372–373

Denique nomina eorum in terris ipsorum, quia opera eorum corruptibilia atque terrena, et ideo ibi scribuntur eorum nomina ubi uiuere maluerunt. qui autem eleuauerunt opera sua, his dicitur: nolite gaudere quia daemonia uobis subiecta sunt, sed gaudete quia nomina uestra scripta sunt in caelo. hinc ergo intellegamus, quia non otiose dominus eos arguit, qui aedificabant sepulchra sibi uel tumulos prophetarum et exornabant ea.

Finally, their names are in their lands, because their works are corruptible and earthly, and therefore their names are written where they preferred to live. But to those who have raised up their works it is said: “Do not rejoice that the demons are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” From this, then, let us understand that not idly did the Lord rebuke those who built tombs for themselves or tombs of the prophets and adorned them.

48.19.2CSEL 64:373

condemnantur enim Iudaei, qui prophetis quos occiderant terrena solacia, non aeterna praemia deferebant. ideoque prohibet, ut discipulus suus sepeliat patrem, quia aeterno patri sine cessatione esse debet intentus. et in Esaiae libro scriptum est: quid, inquit, quia aedificasti et excidisti tibi sepulchrum? et reprehenditur Maria, quae Christum in tumulo requirebat.

For the Jews are condemned, who offered the prophets whom they had killed earthly consolations, not eternal rewards. And therefore he forbids his disciple to bury his father, because he ought to be intent without ceasing on the eternal Father. And in the book of Isaiah it is written: “Why,” he says, “have you built and hewn yourself a tomb?” And Mary is rebuked, who sought Christ in the tomb.

48.19.3CSEL 64:373

relinque sepulchra, quae reliquerunt qui audita uoce domini in ipsius passione surrexere de tumulis, noli inter mortuos habitare qui uiuis. audi uocem resuscitantis Iesu: surge qui dormis et exurge a mortuis, ut lumen tibi Christi infundatur aeternum. lumen eius spiritus sanctus est, qui apostolis sanctis in dispersione linguarum tamquam ignis inluxit.

Leave the tombs, which those left who, hearing the voice of the Lord in his passion, rose from their graves; do not dwell among the dead, you who live. Hear the voice of Jesus raising you: “Rise, you who sleep, and arise from the dead”, so that the eternal light of Christ may be poured into you. His light is the Holy Spirit, who shone like fire on the holy apostles in the dividing of the tongues.

Explanation 48, chapter 20

48.20.1CSEL 64:373

Sequitur: homo cum in honore esset non intellexit; comparatus est iumentis quae sine sensu sunt et similis factus est illis. haec uia eorum in offendiculum ipsis, et postea in ore eorum complacebunt. quia non intellexit homo cum in honore esset — est autem honor, quod ad imaginem dei factus est, factus est rationis capax —, comparatus est iumentis quae sensum non habent; qui autem intellexit angelis comparatur.

There follows: “Man, when he was in honour, did not understand; he is compared to the beasts that are without sense and has become like them. This way of theirs is a stumbling block to them, and afterwards they will be pleased in their mouth.” Because man did not understand when he was in honour — and the honour is that he was made to the image of God, made capable of reason —, he is compared to beasts that have no sense; but he who has understood is compared to the angels.

48.20.2CSEL 64:373–374

et ideo hic bonorum operum claritate magnificus est, ille sicut equus adhinniens aestimatur conluuione uiuendi, quae uiae offendiculum affert in turpitudine et obscenitate uiuentibus; insipientia enim uiri contaminat uias eius. huiusmodi autem uiri uiuunt secundum appetentiam suam, quae offendiculum creat, et post offendiculum complacebunt in ore suo, sed non in corde; non enim boni de quibus dicitur: ore suo benedicebant et corde suo maledicebant. quo responsum est etiam his qui habent in codicibus suis ita scriptum: et postea in ore suo benedicent. uerbum enim tuum prope et in ore tuo sit et in corde.

And therefore this one is magnificent in the brightness of good works, that one is reckoned like a neighing horse by the filth of his living, which brings a stumbling block to the way of those who live in baseness and obscenity; for the folly of a man defiles his ways. Such men live according to their appetite, which creates a stumbling block, and after the stumbling block they will be pleased in their mouth, but not in their heart; for they are not good, of whom it is said: “With their mouth they blessed and with their heart they cursed.” This answers those too who have it written thus in their copies: “And afterwards they will bless with their mouth.” For let your word be near you, in your mouth and in your heart.

Explanation 48, chapter 21

48.21.1CSEL 64:374

Sicut oues in infernum deducentur, mors depascet eos; et dominabuntur eorum iusti in matutinum et auxilium eorum ueterascet in inferno a gloria eorum. qui noluerunt, ut pasceret eos Christus, depascet eos mors. quis ergo dimittat bonum pastorem, qui pro ouibus suis animam suam ponit, quia pertinet ad eum gregis sui cura? aut quis eligat mercennariam mortem, quae operum pessimorum digna mercede referatur? simul cognosce o homo, quia Christus uerus est pastor, qui suos pascit ad uitam. mors sub-

“Like sheep they will be led down into hell; death will feed on them; and the righteous will rule over them in the morning, and their help will grow old in hell, away from their glory.” Those who did not wish Christ to feed them, death will feed on. Who, then, would leave the good shepherd, who lays down his life for his sheep, because the care of his flock belongs to him? Or who would choose death, the hireling, which is paid back as the worthy wage of the worst works? Know at the same time, O man, that Christ is the true shepherd, who feeds his own for life. Death

48.21.2CSEL 64:374

intrauit, quae ad interitum adducit alienos et deuorat eos, quibus potest propter eorum flagitia praeualere. quibus licet in hac uita studium potentiae fuerit et diuitiarum, ut aliis dominarentur, sed in resurrectione erit seruitus, cum iustis matutinus splendor inluxerit, quorum figura est, quod Iacob dominus praeponitur fratri. miserabilis itaque seruitus, ut eo tempore, quo alii uocantur in gloriam splendoris et luminis, horum gloria ueterascat et consumatur in tenebris inferorum, meritoque de his dicitur: de honore suo et a gloria sua expulsi sunt, quia temporalis haec gloria.

crept in, which leads strangers to destruction and devours those over whom it can prevail because of their crimes. Though in this life they had the pursuit of power and riches, so as to rule over others, in the resurrection there will be servitude, when the morning splendour shines on the righteous, of which there is a figure in Jacob being set as lord over his brother. A wretched servitude, then, that at the time when others are called into the glory of splendour and light, their glory should grow old and be consumed in the darkness of hell; and rightly it is said of them: “They have been driven from their honour and from their glory”, because this glory is temporal.

Explanation 48, chapter 22

48.22.1CSEL 64:374–375

Uerumtamen deus liberabit, inquit, animam meam de manu inferni, cum acceperit eam. bene hoc dicit qui sciebat animam suam in inferno non derelinquendam. descendit enim, ut captiuos absolueret de faucibus inferorum, non ut in his captiua remaneret.

“But God,” he says, “will free my soul from the hand of hell, when he receives it.” Rightly he says this who knew that his soul would not be left in hell. For he went down to free the captives from the jaws of hell, not to remain a captive among them.

Explanation 48, chapter 23

48.23.1CSEL 64:375

Ergo quoniam haec, quae in isto saeculo sunt, nobiscum transire non possunt, ideo tibi dicitur: ne timueris, cum diues factus fuerit homo et cum multiplicata fuerit gloria domus eius, quoniam non cum morietur accipiet omnia neque simul descendet cum eo gloria domus eius. noli, inquit, expauescere diuitias et potentiam diuitis et gloriam saecularem, quoniam caduca illa sunt et citius abeunt quam uenerunt.

So, since the things of this world cannot pass over with us, therefore it is said to you: “Do not fear when a man has become rich and when the glory of his house has been multiplied, since when he dies he will not take all things, nor will the glory of his house go down with him.” Do not, he says, be afraid of the riches and power of the rich man and worldly glory, since they are perishable and go away faster than they came.

48.23.2CSEL 64:375

somnium est iste thesaurus; euigilas et recessit, quoniam, qui potuerit crapulam mundi istius edormire et sobrietatem uirtutis assumere, ista contemnit et pro nihilo pecuniam ducit. neque timueris, cum multiplicatam gloriam domus alicuius potentis audieris. inspice diligenter, et uacua est quae nihil habeat de fidei plenitudine. et quid de domo dicam? uacuus erat totus hic mundus, antequam numero credentium eum Christus impleret, ideoque scriptum est: iudicabit inter gentes, replebit ruinas.

This treasure is a dream; you wake and it has gone, since he who has been able to sleep off the drunkenness of this world and take up the sobriety of virtue despises these things and counts money as nothing. And do not fear when you hear of the multiplied glory of some powerful man’s house. Look carefully, and it is empty, having nothing of the fullness of faith. And what shall I say of a house? This whole world was empty before Christ filled it with the number of believers; and therefore it is written: “He will judge among the nations; he will fill up the ruins.”

48.23.3CSEL 64:375

quid enim aliud erat ante in hoc mundo nisi ruina perfidiae? quid est ruina? audi dicentem: ubi ruina, ibi et a quilae, est: ubi ruina, ibi et resurrectio. ruina uacua firmitatis est, resurrectio plenitudo uiuendi est. ideoque nos Adae illius ruina uacuauit, sed Christi repleuit gratia. ideo se ille exinaniuit, ut nos repleret atque in carne hominis plenitudo uirtutis habitaret. quid sit ruina, cognosce.

For what else was there before in this world but the ruin of faithlessness? What is ruin? Hear him saying: “Where the ruin is, there too the eagles”, that is: where the ruin is, there too is the resurrection. Ruin is empty of firmness; resurrection is the fullness of living. And therefore the ruin of that Adam emptied us, but the grace of Christ filled us. Therefore he emptied himself, so as to fill us and so that the fullness of virtue might dwell in the flesh of man. Learn what ruin is.

48.23.4CSEL 64:375

dum uiuit homo, infusus est spiritu; ubi mortuus fuerit, uacuus utique huius uitalis est spiritus. multo magis uacuum facit amissio gratiae spiritalis, quem gratia replere consueuit, ut possimus dicere: quoniam nos omnes de plenitudine eius accepimus, et gratiam pro gratia. de alio dicitur: in uacuum laboraui, iustus autem sicut odor agri pleni.

While a man lives, he is filled with spirit; when he has died, he is certainly empty of this vital spirit. Much more does the loss of spiritual grace make empty the one whom grace was accustomed to fill, so that we can say: “For we have all received of his fullness, and grace for grace.” Of another it is said: “I have laboured in vain”; but the righteous man is like the smell of a full field.

Explanation 48, chapter 24

48.24.1CSEL 64:375–376

Quid autem non uacuum quod saeculare atque mundanum, cum recte dixerit qui mundum istum sobria uirtute contempsit: nudus sum natus, nudus et moriar? numquid secum quis potest auferre quae possidet? hic omnia derelinquit, solus intrat in tumulum et uacuum illius diuitis est sepulchrum, quem nec ipsa terra capiebat. unde dictum est: numquid soli habitabitis super terram? numquid descendit in illud sepulchrum gloria domus eius aut copiae? uide uim scripturae.

And what is not empty that is worldly and of this world, since he rightly said who despised this world with sober virtue: “Naked I was born, naked too I shall die”? Can anyone take with him what he possesses? Here he leaves everything, he enters the tomb alone, and empty is the tomb of that rich man whom the earth itself could not hold. Hence it was said: “Will you alone dwell upon the earth?” Did the glory of his house or his wealth go down into that tomb? See the force of Scripture.

48.24.2CSEL 64:376

gloria saeculi non descendet cum peccatore, sed gloria uirtutis ascendet cum innocente et, ut compendiosius dicamus, gloria hominis cum ascendente ascendet, cum descendente non descendet. quod gratiae est ac uirtutis, ascendet. in paradisum ascenditur, in infernum descenditur. descendant, inquit,

The glory of the world will not go down with the sinner, but the glory of virtue will go up with the innocent; and, to say it more briefly, the glory of a man will go up with one who goes up, it will not go down with one who goes down. What belongs to grace and virtue will go up. One goes up to paradise, one goes down to hell. “Let them go down,” he says,

48.24.3CSEL 64:376

in infernum uiuentes, ideoque Lazarus pauper per angelos in Abrahae sinum est eleuatus. diues luxuriosus eleuans in inferno oculos suos rogat Abraham, ut mittat pauperem et digito suo contingat linguam eius, quo requiem aliquam in ardore maximo constitutus possit adipisci. uide illum pauperem bonis omnibus abundantem, quem sancti patriarchae requies beata circumdabat; uide hunc uacuum, qui sibi in hoc saeculo abundare omnibus uidebatur, cuius anima in uita ipsius benedicebatur, sed nunc iners morte cruciatur.

“alive into hell.” And therefore Lazarus the poor man was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom. The luxurious rich man, lifting his eyes in hell, asks Abraham to send the poor man to touch his tongue with his finger, so that, set in the greatest burning, he may obtain some rest. See that poor man abounding in all good things, whom the blessed rest of the holy patriarch surrounded; see this empty one, who seemed to himself in this world to abound in all things, whose soul was blessed in his life, but now is tormented, helpless, by death.

Explanation 48, chapter 25

48.25.1CSEL 64:376

Unde pulchre sequitur: quoniam anima eius in uita ipsius benedicetur, confitebitur tibi cum benefeceris ipsi. benedicent, inquit, eum benedictione terrena stulti homines, qui praesentia, non futura considerant, benedicent eum adseclae eius atque parasiti. ipse quoque beatum se putat, si agrum aliquem quem desiderabat inuaserit. confitetur tunc deo, cum ei in hoc saeculo secunda succedunt, quando autem aduersa contingunt, impio ore maledicit. hoc ergo dicit, quia saecularis non agit gratias in paupertate positus et aduersis;

Hence there follows beautifully: “Since his soul will be blessed in his life, he will confess to you when you do good to him.” Foolish men, he says, who consider present things, not future, will bless him with an earthly blessing; his hangers-on and parasites will bless him. He himself too thinks himself blessed if he has seized some field he desired. He confesses to God when things go well for him in this world; but when adversities come, he curses with an impious mouth. This, then, he says: that the worldly man does not give thanks when set in poverty and adversity;

48.25.2CSEL 64:376–377

iustus autem in angustiis magis dominum grato benedicit affectu. denique diabolus ad deum dicit: quid mirum si te benedicit Iob? abundant ei omnia. sed mitte, inquit, manum tuam et tange ea quae possidet; uideamus si in faciem te benedicit. et dedit ipsi dominus potestatem, ut, quae saeculi essent huius, auferret, carnem ipsius ulceris atrocitate perfunderet. Iob tamen benedicebat dicens: dominus dedit, dominus abstulit; sit nomen domini benedictum.

but the righteous man in distress blesses the Lord the more with grateful affection. Finally the devil says to God: “What wonder if Job blesses you? He has everything in abundance. But send,” he says, “your hand and touch what he possesses; let us see whether he blesses you to your face.” And the Lord gave him power to take away the things of this world and to cover his flesh with the horror of sores. Yet Job blessed him, saying: “The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”

Explanation 48, chapter 26

48.26.1CSEL 64:377

Introibit usque in progeniem patrum eius, usque in saeculum non uidebit lumen. homo cum in honore esset non intellexit, comparatus est iumentis quae sensum non habent et similis factus est illis. ideo, inquit, iste in progeniem patrum suorum introibit. qui est pater impiorum, dominus declarauit dicens: uos ex patre diabolo estis.

“He will go in to the generation of his fathers; for ever he will not see light. Man, when he was in honour, did not understand; he is compared to the beasts that have no sense and has become like them.” Therefore, he says, this one will go in to the generation of his fathers. Who is the father of the ungodly the Lord declared, saying: “You are of your father the devil.”

48.26.2CSEL 64:377

sunt et illi patres, de quibus dicitur: relinque mortuos sepelire mortuos suos. ideo et Moabitae usque in tertiam et quartam generationem prohibiti sunt introire in ecclesiam domini, ut filii eorum propter peccata patrum suorum introirent in eorum generationem, quorum facta imitabantur et mores. unde et scriptum est: filii adulterorum inconsummati erunt.

There are also those fathers of whom it is said: “Let the dead bury their dead.” Therefore the Moabites too were forbidden to enter the assembly of the Lord to the third and fourth generation, so that their sons, because of the sins of their fathers, entered into the generation of those whose deeds and ways they imitated. Hence it is also written: “The children of adulterers will not come to maturity.”

48.26.3CSEL 64:377–378

ergo qui non illum patrem qui in caelo est sequitur, sed illum terrena conluuione uiuentem, in progeniem terreni patris intrat. qualis enim terrenus, tales et terreni, ut sit eius uita terrena, requies nulla post mortem, in aeternum non uideat lumen, quoniam temporale quaesiuit. ille autem, qui Christi secutus est gloriam, qui desiderauit illud lumen, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, inueniet et uidebit lumen aeternum, quia eum Christus redemit a morte.

So he who follows not that Father who is in heaven, but that one living in earthly filth, enters the generation of the earthly father. For as is the earthly, such are the earthly, so that his life is earthly, there is no rest after death, he does not see light for ever, since he sought what is temporal. But he who has followed the glory of Christ, who has desired that light which enlightens every man coming into this world, will find and see the eternal light, because Christ has redeemed him from death.

Explanation 48, chapter 27

48.27.1CSEL 64:378

Tunc ergo cogitabit secum, quia cum in honore esset non intellexit, et ideo erit similis iumentorum, qui similis debuit esse angelorum per domini nostri Iesu Christi gratiam, cui est honor, gloria, perpetuitas a saeculis et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.

Then, therefore, he will think to himself that, when he was in honour, he did not understand, and therefore he will be like the beasts, he who should have been like the angels through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be honour, glory and everlastingness from the ages, now and always and for all ages of ages. Amen.

Explanation 61, chapter 1

61.1.1CSEL 64:378–379

Omnium nostrum indubia consuetudo est, ut festinemus ad finem et eorum, quae legimus uel uidimus et audiuimus, uelimus summam cognoscere. unde titulus ipse otiosos nos esse non patitur nec feriatis praeterire auribus desiderii communis indicium. prae ceteris enim, licet etiam in ceteris clareat, diuinum tamen in huiusmodi psalmo refulget oraculum. unde diligentius qui sit finis consideremus; finis enim dicitur σκοπός; et summa rei eius, quam uolumus explicare. finis dicitur Christus, quia ipse est finis legis, sicut scriptum est:

It is the undoubted custom of us all to hasten to the end and to wish to know the sum of what we read or have seen and heard. Hence the title itself does not allow us to be idle, nor to pass over with holiday ears the sign of a common desire. For above the rest, though it shines in the rest too, the divine oracle shines in a psalm of this kind. Hence let us consider more carefully what the end is; for the end is called skopos, and the sum of the matter we wish to explain. Christ is called the end, because he is the end of the law, as it is written:

61.1.2CSEL 64:379

finis enim legis Christus ad iustitiam omni credenti. finis etiam dicitur, quia ipse est principium et finis. ergo isti psalmi qui titulantur in finem aut de Christo sunt aut ipsius Christi: de Christo, cum ipse annuntiatur, ipsius Christi, cum ipse se nuntiat uenturumque promittit in terras et futuram nobis reuelare dignatur proprii corporis passionem.

“For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” He is also called the end because he is the beginning and the end. So these psalms which are entitled “to the end” are either about Christ or Christ’s own: about Christ, when he is announced; Christ’s own, when he announces himself and promises that he will come to earth and deigns to reveal to us the coming passion of his own body.

Explanation 61, chapter 2

61.2.1CSEL 64:379

Ideoque ipsi Dauid inscribuntur in titulo, quasi uero Dauid, ipsi domino, prophetici oris ministeria deputentur, per quem humanae uocis officio uis caelestis increpuit et diuina sententia resultauit.

And therefore they are inscribed in the title “to David himself”, as though the ministries of the prophetic mouth were assigned to the true David, the Lord himself, through whom the heavenly power sounded forth by the office of a human voice and the divine sentence resounded.

Explanation 61, chapter 3

61.3.1CSEL 64:379

Meritoque pro Idithun, qui fuit propheta et psalmos cum sex filiis canebat suis, uelut quaedam praefatio est, eo quod esset his uenia prophetandi, qui in psallendi ministerio constituti diuina oracula humana uoce loquerentur. et quia pro totius mundi abolendo errore suscipienda dominici corporis passio foret, huius scilicet nomine, cuius sedulitas probaretur, commendatiorem eruditionem plebis expressit. itaque ipsum audiamus loquentem.

And rightly “for Jeduthun”, who was a prophet and sang psalms with his six sons, is a kind of preface, because the leave to prophesy belonged to those who, appointed to the ministry of singing psalms, spoke the divine oracles with a human voice. And since the passion of the Lord’s body was to be undergone for abolishing the error of the whole world, by the name of this man, whose diligence was approved, he expressed the more commended instruction of the people. So let us hear him speaking.

Explanation 61, chapter 4

61.4.1CSEL 64:379

Nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? suscepturus carnem hominis dominus noster Iesus, ut in se eam ipse mundaret, quid prius quam peccati ueteris primum debuit abolere contagium? nam quia per inoboedientiam culpa inrepserat, dum mandata diuina temerantur, oboedientiam utique prae ceteris debuit reformare, ut seminarium erroris excluderet.

“Will not my soul be subject to God?” Our Lord Jesus, about to take on the flesh of man so as to cleanse it in himself, what ought he to have abolished first but the contagion of the old sin? For since guilt had crept in through disobedience, while the divine commands were violated, he surely ought above all to restore obedience, so as to shut out the seedbed of error.

61.4.2CSEL 64:379

fibra enim peccati inde manauerat et ideo sicut bonus medicus radices prius ulceris debuit amputare, ut medicamentorum salubre remedium uulneris ora sentirent. frustra enim cicatricem curaueris, si serpant interiora contagia, immo acerbatur uulnus, si foris clauditur, cum interius uirus exaestuat. nam quid proderat donasse peccatum, si peccandi maneret affectus?

For the fibre of sin had flowed from there, and therefore, like a good physician, he ought first to cut away the roots of the ulcer, so that the edges of the wound might feel the healthful remedy of the medicines. For in vain will you treat a scar if the inner infections creep on; rather the wound grows worse if it is closed outside while the poison seethes within. For what would it profit to have forgiven sin, if the disposition to sin remained?

61.4.3CSEL 64:379–380

hoc erat non sanare cicatricem, sed claudere. uoluit itaque mundare uulnus, ut affectum sanaret, ne inoboedientiae sors ulla remaneret. suscepit ipse oboedientiam, ut nobis eam transfunderet. sic enim oportebat, ut, quoniam per inoboedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti erant plurimi, per unius rursus oboedientiam iusti constituerentur multi.

That would be not to heal the scar but to close it. So he willed to cleanse the wound, so as to heal the disposition, lest any lot of disobedience remain. He himself took on obedience, so as to pour it into us. For it was fitting that, since through the disobedience of one man very many were made sinners, through the obedience of one in turn many should be made righteous.

Explanation 61, chapter 5

61.5.1CSEL 64:380

Unde ualde errare eos res indicat, qui carnem hominis a Christo aiunt esse susceptam, affectum negant, et contra ipsius domini Iesu uenire consilium, qui hominem ex homine tollunt, cum homo sine affectu hominis esse non possit; nam caro sine affectu et praemii immunis et culpae est. illud ergo suscipere debuit et sanare, unde

Hence the fact shows that those err greatly who say that the flesh of man was taken on by Christ but deny the human disposition, and go against the counsel of the Lord Jesus himself, they who take the man away from the man, since a man cannot be without the disposition of a man; for flesh without disposition is free of both reward and guilt. He ought, then, to take on and heal that from which

61.5.2CSEL 64:380

culpa manauerat, ut originem erroris et quasdam prorumpentis delicti fores clauderet. unde ego hodie hominem agnoscerem dominum Iesum, cuius carnem non uideo, affectum lego, unde, inquam, hominem eum agnoscerem, nisi esurisset, nisi sitisset, nisi fleuisset, nisi dixisset: tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem? denique scriptum est: et homo est, et quis cognoscet eum?

guilt had flowed, so as to close the origin of error and certain doors of bursting offence. For how would I today recognize the Lord Jesus as man, whose flesh I do not see but whose disposition I read of; how, I say, would I recognize him as man unless he had hungered, unless he had thirsted, unless he had wept, unless he had said: “My soul is sorrowful even to death”? Finally it is written: “And he is a man, and who will know him?”

61.5.3CSEL 64:380

sed homo per ista cognoscitur, qui per opera diuina supra homines aestimatur. itaque ipse eo usque se hominem credi uolebat, cum deus esset, ut se appellaret hominem dicens: quid me quaeritis occidere, hominem qui ueritatem locutus sum uobis?, nec solum hominem, sed etiam filium hominis diceret, sicut ait: quid me dicunt esse homines filium hominis? unde ille summam tenere fidei pronuntiatus est, qui et dei filium cognouit et hominem non negauit.

But he who by divine works is reckoned above men is known as man through these things. So he himself wished to be believed a man to the point, though he was God, of calling himself a man, saying: “Why do you seek to kill me, a man who has spoken the truth to you?”; and he called himself not only man but also Son of Man, as he says: “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” Hence he was declared to hold the sum of faith who both recognized the Son of God and did not deny the man.

61.5.4CSEL 64:380–381

ipse igitur utrumque unus, inseparabilis numero et agnoscendus operis distinctione, non uarietate personae. non enim alter ex patre et alter ex Maria, sed qui erat ex patre carnem sumpsit ex uirgine, affectum assumpsit ex matre, ut infirmitates nostras ipse susciperet. unde ait propheta et pro nobis dolet. quomodo dolebat meo dolore, si meum non gerebat affectum? homo, inquit, in plaga et sciens ferre infirmitatem.

He himself, then, is both in one, inseparable in number and to be recognized by the distinction of his works, not by a difference of person. For it is not one from the Father and another from Mary, but he who was from the Father took flesh from the Virgin, took on human disposition from his mother, so as to take on our infirmities himself. Hence the prophet says: “And he grieves for us.” How did he grieve with my grief, if he did not bear my disposition? “A man,” he says, “in affliction, and knowing how to bear infirmity.”

Explanation 61, chapter 6

61.6.1CSEL 64:381

Itaque quasi homo infirmatus est, quasi homo doluit et nos quasi hominem aestimauimus eum esse in doloribus; sed quasi uictor infirmitatum, non infirmitatibus uictus pro nobis, non pro se dolebat et infirmatus est non propter sua, sed propter nostra peccata, ut nos suo liuore sanaret. quid utique est homo in plaga et sciens ferre infirmitatem, nisi quia plagae habebat compassionem?

So as a man he was made weak, as a man he grieved, and we esteemed him as a man in sorrows; but as the conqueror of weaknesses, not conquered by weaknesses, he grieved for us, not for himself, and was made weak not because of his own sins but because of ours, so as to heal us by his bruise. What indeed is “a man in affliction and knowing how to bear infirmity”, unless that he had compassion in his affliction?

61.6.2CSEL 64:381

aut quomodo sciebat ferre infirmitatem, si sensum infirmitatis excluserat? quod enim portamus, hoc pro onere sustinemus. suscepit ergo peccata nostra, ut portaret, suscepit etiam, ut purgaret. denique scriptum est: et peccata eorum ipse purgauit. ideo ipse hereditate possidebit multos et fortium partietur spolia. ibi enim maior triumphus, ubi mens interna mundatur. quod portat igitur, ad remissionem pertinet, quod purgat, ad correctionem.

Or how did he know how to bear infirmity, if he had excluded the sense of infirmity? For what we carry, we bear as a burden. So he took on our sins, to carry them; he also took them on, to cleanse them. Finally it is written: “And he himself cleansed their sins.” Therefore he will possess many as an inheritance and divide the spoils of the strong. For there is a greater triumph where the inner mind is cleansed. What he carries, then, belongs to forgiveness; what he cleanses, to correction.

61.6.3CSEL 64:381

suscepit itaque compassionem nostram, suscepit et subiectionem; quod enim subiecit sibi omnia suum est, quod subiectus est nostrum est. ideoque ait: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? anima, inquit, subdita, non diuinitas, anima subiecta, non dei uirtus; uirtus enim dei non potestati subdita est, sed unitati, et consortio eius utitur potestatis. illa subiecta est, quae humanae condicionis fragilitate plerumque mutatur, non quae mutari non potest.

So he took on our compassion, he took on subjection too; for that he subjected all things to himself is his own, that he was subject is ours. And therefore he says: “Will not my soul be subject to God?” The soul, he says, subject, not the Godhead; the soul subjected, not the power of God; for the power of God is not subject to power but to unity, and enjoys the fellowship of his power. That is subjected which is often changed by the frailty of the human condition, not that which cannot be changed.

61.6.4CSEL 64:381–382

anima carni compatitur et animae caro, quae sibi quodam contubernio copulantur. illa subicitur quae tristis est, quia scriptum est: tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem; illa subicitur quae suscepta, non ex deo patre nata. quamquam ipsa subiectio non in specie quidem infirmitatis sit, sed in operatione uirtutis, dispensationis magis temporariae arbitra quam perpetuo seruitio mancipata. unde et ait: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea?

The soul suffers with the flesh and the flesh with the soul, which are joined to each other in a kind of shared dwelling. That is subjected which is sorrowful, because it is written: “My soul is sorrowful even to death”; that is subjected which was taken up, not born of God the Father. And yet that subjection itself is not in the appearance of weakness but in the working of power, the arbiter rather of a temporary dispensation than bound over to perpetual slavery. Hence he says: “Will not my soul be subject to God?”

Explanation 61, chapter 7

61.7.1CSEL 64:382

Cur dixit erit, si sempiterna subiectio est? sed quia filius dei qui loquebatur aeternus est, animam autem suscepit ex tempore, ideo futuram subiectionem animae suae dicit. per ipsam ergo ob-

Why did he say “will be”, if the subjection is everlasting? But because the Son of God who was speaking is eternal, but took on a soul in time, therefore he speaks of the subjection of his soul as future. Through it, then, came obedience,

61.7.2CSEL 64:382

oedientia, per ipsam humilitas, quae tamen non ad infirmitatem potentiae suscepta sunt, sed ad magisterium disciplinae. ipse enim dominus Iesus, cum esset in dei forma, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo, sed semet ipsum exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, in similitudine hominum factus; in specie inuentus ut homo humiliauit semet ipsum factus oboediens usque ad mortem, sicut apostolus dicit, non iugem et perpetuam, sed temporalem subiectionem cu-

through it humility, which yet were taken on not for weakness of power but for the teaching of discipline. For the Lord Jesus himself, though he was in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal to God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men; found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, as the apostle says, wishing to declare a subjection not continual and perpetual but temporal,

61.7.3CSEL 64:382

piens declarare, qualis sit suscepta cum carne et deposita cum ipsius corporis seruitute. sic etiam ad Hebraeos scriptum est. nam cum proposuisset exemplum dicens: tu es sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech, subiecit idem Paulus: qui in diebus carnis preces et supplicationes adhibuit ei qui posset liberare eum de morte cum magna uoce et lacrimis et exauditus ab illo metu, quamquam esset filius, didicit ex his quae passus est oboedientiam et consummatus obtemperantibus sibi causa factus est salutis aeternae,

such as was taken on with the flesh and laid aside with the servitude of that body. So too it is written to the Hebrews. For when he had set out the example, saying: “You are a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek”, the same Paul added: “Who in the days of his flesh offered prayers and supplications to him who was able to save him from death, with loud cries and tears, and was heard from that fear; although he was a Son, he learned obedience from what he suffered, and being made perfect he became the cause of eternal salvation to those who obey him,

61.7.4CSEL 64:382

uocatus a deo sacerdos secundum ordinem Melchisedech. nonne igitur euidenter clamauit apostolus, dicens oboedientiam illam et humilitatem non diuinitatis fuisse, sed carnis? quod enim discitur, temporale est. quasi homo ergo ex his quae passus est didicit oboedientiam, ut consummaretur in carne et per oboedientiae transfusam in nos successionem causa fieret nobis salutis aeternae, quibus ante per inoboedientiae hereditatem primus ille Adam causa factus est mortis.

called by God a priest after the order of Melchizedek.” Did not the apostle, then, clearly cry out, saying that that obedience and humility belonged not to the Godhead but to the flesh? For what is learned is temporal. So as a man he learned obedience from what he suffered, so as to be made perfect in the flesh and, through the succession of obedience poured into us, to become the cause of eternal salvation for us, for whom before, through the inheritance of disobedience, that first Adam became the cause of death.

Explanation 61, chapter 8

61.8.1CSEL 64:382–383

Subiectio ergo magisterium uirtutis humanae, non diuinae imminutio potestatis est. nam si illum minorem filium et inaequalem patri dicunt, quia erat subditus patri deo, numquid et matre ideo minor, quia erat subditus matri? lectum est enim de Ioseph et Maria: et erat subditus illis. sed pietas omnibus nobis non dispendio, sed incremento est, per quam omnibus nobis dominus Iesus fidem infudit et gratiam, ut nos spiritu fideli subditos patri faciat deo.

Subjection, then, is a teaching of human virtue, not a lessening of divine power. For if they call the Son less and unequal to the Father because he was subject to God the Father, is he therefore less than his mother too, because he was subject to his mother? For it is read of Joseph and Mary: “And he was subject to them.” But piety is not a loss but a gain for all of us, through which the Lord Jesus has poured faith and grace into all of us, so as to make us subject to God the Father with a faithful spirit.

61.8.2CSEL 64:383

et ideo nouo et profundo consilio apostolus ait, quod ipse patri erit subiectus in nobis, cum fuerit in omnibus plenitudo fidei et quaedam deuotionis unitas. nunc enim, quamdiu sententiis discrepamus, quodammodo regnum Christi minoramus, quia nondum ei subiecta sunt omnia cuius regnum unitas est; cum autem subiecta illi fuerint omnia, tunc et ipse subiectus erit illi qui sibi subiecit omnia, ut sit deus omnia in omnibus, sicut scriptum est.

And therefore with new and deep counsel the apostle says that he will be subject to the Father in us, when there is in all the fullness of faith and a kind of unity of devotion. For now, as long as we differ in opinions, we in a way lessen the kingdom of Christ, because not yet are all things subject to him whose kingdom is unity; but when all things have been subjected to him, then he too will be subject to him who subjected all things to himself, so that God may be all in all, as it is written.

61.8.3CSEL 64:383

nunc enim potestate supra omnes est, sed opus est ut sit in omnibus uoluntate; uolet autem, cum omnia in nobis cognouerit sui plena et uacua delictorum. nondum igitur subiectus est patri, quia nondum omnia et in omnibus Christus; cum autem fuerit omnia et in omnibus Christus, erit omnia et in omnibus deus. unde colligitur unum esse regnum patris et filii et etiam spiritus sancti, quia qui filium receperit recipit et patrem, recipit et spiritum sanctum, quia una potestas, una gratia, una operatio trinitatis est.

For now he is above all by power, but he needs to be in all by will; and he will will it when he has known that all things in us are full of him and empty of offences. So he is not yet subject to the Father, because Christ is not yet all and in all; but when Christ is all and in all, God will be all and in all. From this it is gathered that the kingdom of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit too is one, because he who has received the Son receives also the Father, receives also the Holy Spirit, because there is one power, one grace, one working of the Trinity.

Explanation 61, chapter 9

61.9.1CSEL 64:383

Meritoque addidit dominus: ab ipso enim salutare meum, quasi diceret: nolite turbari, quia dixi animam meam fore deo subditam: anima erit subdita quae uestri est portio, salutare autem meum ab ipso, hoc est quia a patre et in patre semper sum. a patre enim ueni in hunc mundum et si uidetis hominem, dei filium credite; cum uenerit autem paracletus quem ego mittam uobis a patre meo, spiritus ueritatis qui a patre meo procedit, ille testimonium perhibebit de me.

And rightly the Lord added: “For from him is my salvation”, as though he said: Do not be troubled because I said that my soul would be subject to God: the soul will be subject which is your portion, but my salvation is from him, that is, because I am always from the Father and in the Father. For from the Father I came into this world, and if you see a man, believe the Son of God; “but when the Paraclete comes, whom I will send you from my Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from my Father, he will bear witness to me.”

61.9.2CSEL 64:383–384

et filius a patre procedit et spiritus ab ipso procedit; de unitate ergo diuinitatis ambiguum nihil. ideoque concupiuit Dauid hoc salutare dei nobis dari, quia ipse est uita aeterna, si et patrem uerum deum cognoscamus et filium, quem pro nostra certum est salute uenisse, sed non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo. assertionem suae diuinitatis sequestrat et dispensationis humanae repraesentat officium.

Both the Son proceeds from the Father and the Spirit proceeds from him; so there is nothing doubtful about the unity of the Godhead. And therefore David longed for this salvation of God to be given to us, because it is eternal life, if we know both the Father as true God and the Son, who certainly came for our salvation, but did not think it robbery to be equal to God. He sets aside the assertion of his divinity and presents the office of the human dispensation.

Explanation 61, chapter 10

61.10.1CSEL 64:384

Ideoque adiunxit statim: etenim ipse est deus meus, adiutor meus, defensor meus; non mouebor amplius. haec utique quasi homo loquitur, quia in deo spem nostram debemus reponere, ne facile labamur; quamquam in eo quod locutus est: non mouebor amplius ostendat habere se diuinae insignia potestatis.

And therefore he added at once: “For he is my God, my helper, my defender; I shall be moved no more.” These things he certainly says as man, because we ought to place our hope in God, so as not to slip easily; though in saying “I shall be moved no more” he shows that he has the marks of divine power.

61.10.2CSEL 64:384

habes enim alibi dicentem: adhuc ego semel terram mouebo. mouit diluuio, quando praeter arcam Noe caro omnis interiit, mouit, cum Sodoma et Gomorra sacro igne consumptae sunt. haec supernae indignationis indicia sunt. sed quia elegit genus hominum dominus magis seruare quam perdere, non mouebitur amplius ad indignationem, qui uenit ad misericordiam, uenit, ut redimeret nos suo sanguine, non ut nostrum effunderet, uenit, ut se offerret pro nobis et quasi bonus negotiator mercem suam proprii corporis passione seruaret.

For you have elsewhere him saying: “Yet once more I will move the earth.” He moved it by the flood, when all flesh perished except Noah’s ark; he moved it when Sodom and Gomorrah were consumed by sacred fire. These are signs of heavenly indignation. But because the Lord has chosen rather to save the human race than to destroy it, he will no longer be moved to indignation who has come for mercy; he came to redeem us by his blood, not to shed ours; he came to offer himself for us and, like a good merchant, to save his merchandise by the passion of his own body.

Explanation 61, chapter 11

61.11.1CSEL 64:384

Et cum hoc diceret, leuauit oculos suos et uidit hinc persecutores, inde nequitias spiritales in unum conuenire et ait: quo usque irruitis in hominem, interficientes uniuersos?, hoc est: quid delere genus festinatis humanum? nescitis me pro omnium redemptione uenisse? obtuli me pro cunctis, ut omnes mea oblatione protegerem. hominem ergo aut pro humana omni accipimus multitudine aut, si de uno accipimus, de ipso dictum intellegimus: irruitis, sed in hominem, quia supra deum irruere non potestis, sicut habes alibi:

And as he said this, he lifted up his eyes and saw on one side the persecutors, on the other the spiritual wickednesses coming together into one, and said: “How long will you rush upon a man, killing all?”, that is: Why do you hasten to destroy the human race? Do you not know that I have come for the redemption of all? I have offered myself for all, so as to protect all by my offering. “Man”, then, we take either for the whole human multitude or, if we take it of one, we understand it said of him: you rush, but upon a man, because you cannot rush upon God, as you have elsewhere:

61.11.2CSEL 64:384–385

quid me quaeritis occidere hominem? neque enim diuinitas morti poterat esse subiecta, sed humana susceptio. si ergo in me irruitis et me uultis tenere, quid eos qui mecum sunt uultis occidere? satis est uobis habere quem quaeritis. non quaero consortem passionis, qui ad salutem omnium adiutore non egeo. non requiro legatum, nuntium non praemitto, sed ipse me nuntius obtuli non quaerentibus, me tradidi non comprehendentibus, ut liberarem eos qui mortis laqueis fuerant comprehensi.

“Why do you seek to kill me, a man?” For the Godhead could not be subject to death, but the human nature taken on could. If, then, you rush upon me and wish to hold me, why do you wish to kill those who are with me? It is enough for you to have the one you seek. I do not seek a sharer in the passion, I who need no helper for the salvation of all. I do not seek an envoy, I do not send a messenger ahead, but I myself offered myself as messenger to those who did not seek me, I gave myself up to those who did not seize me, so as to free those who had been seized by the snares of death.

61.11.3CSEL 64:385

irruitis igitur tamquam parieti inclinato et maceriae inpulsae, ignari quia ueni, non ut inclinarem parietem et maceriam inpellerem, sed ut soluerem. ueni enim pax, ut faciam utraque unum, et medium parietem maceriae soluens, qui carnem et animam diuidebat, ut unum sentire non possent. et ideo caro animae repugnabat et subdita imperio eius esse non poterat, quia obiecti parietis obstaculo gubernaculis eius parere non poterat.

You rush, then, as on a leaning wall and a tottering fence, not knowing that I came not to make the wall lean and push the fence, but to break it down. For I came as peace, to make both one, and breaking down the middle wall of the fence, which divided flesh and soul so that they could not think as one. And therefore the flesh fought against the soul and could not be subject to its rule, because, through the obstacle of the wall set between, it could not obey its government.

Explanation 61, chapter 12

61.12.1CSEL 64:385

Lex igitur carnis legi mentis aduersabatur. hunc parietem ueterum inimicitiarum uelut murum sustulit dominus Iesus et peruios fecit esse conuentus mentis et carnis, ut in unum coeuntes id quod erat utrique salutare sequerentur. paries ergo quaedam eminentia delictorum est, unde ad pontificem Iudaeorum dicit Paulus: percutere te incipiet deus, paries dealbate; paries enim luto caementisque construitur.

So the law of the flesh was opposed to the law of the mind. This wall of old enmities the Lord Jesus took away like a rampart, and made open meetings of mind and flesh, so that, coming together into one, they might follow what was saving for both. The wall, then, is a kind of prominence of offences; hence Paul says to the high priest of the Jews: “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall”; for a wall is built of mud and rubble.

61.12.2CSEL 64:385

hinc aedificabant Aegyptii ciuitates, quando Iudaei lateres facere cogebantur. in Aegypto lutum conficiebatur et populus dei peccatum illic operabatur; ideo gemebat, ideo exauditus et liberatus est a peccato: ideo lex data, promissa gratia, ut lex peccatum ex parte resecaret, gratia omne donaret.

From this the Egyptians built cities, when the Jews were forced to make bricks. In Egypt clay was prepared, and the people of God worked sin there; therefore they groaned, therefore they were heard and freed from sin; therefore the law was given, grace promised, so that the law might cut away sin in part, grace might forgive it all.

Explanation 61, chapter 13

61.13.1CSEL 64:385

Et cum haec nobis conferret, haec pro nobis subiret, nos pretium eius repellebamus, unde ait: uerumtamen pretium meum cogitauerunt repellere, quando referente Iuda pretium proditore Iudaei in loculum mittere noluerunt dicentes: non licet nobis mittere in loculum, quia pretium sanguinis est. damnatur hic iudicio suo proditor, qui refudit pretium quod accepit, infirmus ad sacri muneris testimonium, sed ualidus sceleris sui testis; unusquisque enim grauior accusator est sui et inexcusabilem in se fert ipse sententiam.

And when he was conferring these things on us, undergoing these things for us, we were rejecting his price; hence he says: “Yet they thought to reject my price”, when, as Judas the traitor brought back the price, the Jews would not put it into the treasury, saying: “It is not lawful for us to put it into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.” Here the traitor is condemned by his own judgment, who paid back the price he had received, weak in testimony to the sacred gift, but strong as witness of his own crime; for each one is his own more grievous accuser and brings an inexcusable sentence on himself.

61.13.2CSEL 64:385–386

principes synagogae suo condemnant se iudicio; profitentur enim pretium esse sanguinis quod dederunt, dum arguunt refundentem. nam si recipiendum non fuit, nec soluendum fuit. atque utinam aut non dedissent aut, quia dederant, nec recepissent! repudiarunt enim quod in loculum mittere noluerunt et emerunt inde agrum in sepulturam peregrinorum. merito ergo gentiles, quibus agri eius, qui morte emptus est Christi, sepultura profecit, iam non sunt aduenae atque peregrini, sed ciues sanctorum facti sunt et domestici dei, quia consepeliuntur dei filio; Iudaei

The chiefs of the synagogue condemn themselves by their own judgment; for they confess that what they gave was the price of blood, while they rebuke the one who pays it back. For if it was not to be received back, neither was it to be paid. And would that they had either not given it or, since they had given it, had not received it back! For they rejected what they would not put into the treasury, and from it they bought a field for the burial of strangers. Rightly, then, the gentiles, whom the burial in the field bought by the death of Christ has profited, are no longer strangers and foreigners, but have become fellow citizens of the saints and members of God’s household, because they are buried with the Son of God; but the Jews,

61.13.3CSEL 64:386

autem, qui passionis eius pretium repudiarunt, peregrinantur a Christo. tolerabilior illis uel in hoc proditor, quod confitetur errorem, illi autem crimen suum excusando acerbant; uerecundior est enim confessio post delictum. impudenter igitur refellebant commune sacrilegium confitentem dicentes: quid ad nos? tu uideris; quid enim dicebat proditor nisi hoc: peccaui quod tradiderim sanguinem iustum? quod erat crimen tradentis, quomodo suscipientis non poterat esse peccatum, cum scelus sceleri sit adiunctum, ut quem scelerate emerunt sceleratius trucidarent?

who rejected the price of his passion, are strangers to Christ. The traitor is more tolerable than they even in this, that he confesses his error; but they make their crime worse by excusing it; for confession after an offence is more modest. So they shamelessly rejected the one who confessed the common sacrilege, saying: “What is that to us? See to it yourself.” For what was the traitor saying but this: “I have sinned in betraying innocent blood”? How could what was the crime of the one who betrayed not be the sin of those who received him, since crime was joined to crime, so that they more wickedly slaughtered the one they had wickedly bought?

Explanation 61, chapter 14

61.14.1CSEL 64:386

Cucurri, inquit, in siti. uerum est quidem quod dominus noster Iesus sitiuit. beata domini sitis, quia sitiuit pro nobis et maxime in passione; denique dixit: sitio. tunc itaque sitiebat, quando de latere suo restinctura sitim omnium uiuae aquae fluenta fundebat. denique scriptum est: flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae.

“I ran,” he says, “in thirst.” It is true indeed that our Lord Jesus thirsted. Blessed the Lord’s thirst, because he thirsted for us, and most of all in the passion; finally he said: “I thirst.” So he thirsted then, when from his side he poured out streams of living water to quench the thirst of all. Finally it is written: “Rivers of living water will flow from his belly.”

61.14.2CSEL 64:386–387

sed in Graeco medie positum est, quia ἔδραμον et singularem et pluralem numerum significat. ergo quia cucurri et cucurrerunt iuxta Graecum possumus intellegere — diximus autem quid exprimat cucurri, hoc est festinaui sitim omnium suscipere, ut uniuersos perpetui fontis ubertate satiarem; cui enim dedero aquam, non sitiet nec hic nec in futurum, sicut dictum est ad Samaritanam —, nunc dicamus, quid significet: cucurrerunt in siti, hoc est festinauerunt, ut perfidiae suae aestu fontem uiuum negantes aeterna fauces suas ariditate siccarent, sicut ipse dominus ait: me dereliquerunt fontem aquae uiuae et fecerunt sibi contritos lacus.

But in the Greek it is put ambiguously, because edramon signifies both singular and plural number. So, since according to the Greek we can understand both “I ran” and “they ran” — we have said what “I ran” expresses, that is, I hastened to take up the thirst of all, so as to satisfy all with the richness of the everlasting fountain; for to whom I give water, he will not thirst either here or in the future, as was said to the Samaritan woman —, now let us say what “they ran in thirst” means, that is, they hastened, so that, denying the living fountain in the heat of their faithlessness, they dried up their throats with everlasting drought, as the Lord himself says: “They have forsaken me, the fountain of living water, and have made for themselves broken cisterns.”

61.14.3CSEL 64:387

nec mirum, si sitierunt qui aquam fontis aeterni tenere non poterant; lubrici perfidiae suae rimis. sitierunt ergo, quia se potu priuauerunt spiritali quem hauserant de consequenti petra. unde et Symmachus ait: owe d oxei, hoc est placuit illis in mendacio, cum obicerent falsa pro ueris. omne mendacium sitim habet, ueritas ubertatem quae in perpetuum perseuerat.

No wonder if they thirsted who could not hold the water of the eternal fountain, through the cracks of their slippery faithlessness. They thirsted, then, because they deprived themselves of the spiritual drink which they had drawn from the rock that followed. Hence Symmachus too says: “They were pleased …”, that is, it pleased them in falsehood, when they cast up false things instead of true. Every falsehood has thirst; truth has richness, which lasts for ever.

Explanation 61, chapter 15

61.15.1CSEL 64:387

Et quam cito probauit quia cucurrerunt in mendacio: ore suo, inquit, benedicebant et corde suo maledicebant. misera perfidorum sitis, qui aliud tenebant corde et ore aliud loquebantur. ubi autem fidei exundat ubertas, corde creditur ad iustitiam, ore confessio fit ad salutem. quomodo autem benedixerint ore et corde maledixerint, series passionis ostendit, cum dicerent: descendat de cruce et credimus ei — stulti! de morte surrexit et non crediderunt: quomodo, si de cruce descenderet, credidissent? —, sperauit in domino, eripiat eum; liberet nunc eum, quoniam uult eum, quia illudentes potius quam optantes ista dicebant et interrogabant, utrum esset dei filius, uerbis pacifica loquentes, corde accusationem sacrilegii cogitantes.

And how quickly he proved that they ran in falsehood: “With their mouth,” he says, “they blessed, and with their heart they cursed.” Wretched the thirst of the faithless, who held one thing in their heart and spoke another with their mouth. But where the richness of faith overflows, one believes with the heart unto righteousness, confession is made with the mouth unto salvation. How they blessed with the mouth and cursed with the heart the course of the passion shows, when they said: “Let him come down from the cross and we will believe him” — fools! He rose from death and they did not believe: how would they have believed if he had come down from the cross? —, “He hoped in the Lord, let him rescue him; let him deliver him now, since he wants him”, because they said these things mocking rather than wishing, and asked whether he was the Son of God, speaking peaceable words, but in their heart planning the charge of sacrilege.

Explanation 61, chapter 16

61.16.1CSEL 64:387–388

Sed haec mystica; ueniamus ad moralia. etenim quoniam non semel appetitur Christus — appetitus est semel in suo corpore quod suscepit in uirgine, appetitus est frequenter in eo corpore quod est ecclesia, nos enim sumus corpus Christi et membra, appetitur et in singulis sanctis suis et innocentibus qui domino se dicarunt —,

But these are mystical things; let us come to moral ones. For since Christ is attacked not once — he was attacked once in his own body which he took from the Virgin; he is attacked often in that body which is the church, for we are the body of Christ and its members; he is attacked also in each of his saints and the innocent who have dedicated themselves to the Lord —,

Explanation 61, chapter 17

61.17.1CSEL 64:388

recordemur aliquem proxime ab omnibus appetitum, a suis destitutum ac proditum; qui dudum in suggestu locatus imperii subito egens omnium ab ipsis, quorum hereditarium fuerat sortitus obsequium, coepit urgeri ingruentibus in exitium, inferentibus mortem.

let us remember one recently attacked by all, abandoned and betrayed by his own; who, lately set on the high seat of empire, suddenly, in need of everything, began to be pressed by those very men whose hereditary allegiance had fallen to his lot, as they rushed in to destroy him and brought death upon him,

61.17.2CSEL 64:388

nullo auxiliatore, nullo iam socio sui, nullo comite. quid aliud melius dixerit quam quod ex ipso cui se deuouit acceperat: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? hoc est: quid persequimini, quid furitis, quid insultatis? carnem potestis interficere, animam non potestis. uitam istam corporis potestis eripere, meritum non potestis extinguere; scriptum est enim: nolite timere eos qui possunt occidere carnem, animam autem non possunt; sed potius eum timete qui potest animam et corpus perdere in gehennam.

with no helper, no ally of his own left, no companion. What better could he say than what he had received from the one to whom he had devoted himself: “Will not my soul be subject to God?” That is: Why do you persecute, why do you rage, why do you insult? You can kill the flesh, you cannot kill the soul. You can snatch away this life of the body, you cannot extinguish merit; for it is written: “Do not fear those who can kill the flesh but cannot kill the soul; but rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”

61.17.3CSEL 64:388

anima ergo quae deo subdita est non est humanae subdita potestati; ab ipso enim uitae fructum sperat aeternae et perpetuae salutis auxilium. ille ergo, cui me tradidi, et necatum tuebitur et mortuum resuscitabit et ulciscetur occisum. raptus est iustus, ne malitia mutaret cor eius. mors ergo ista magis peccati fuga quam morientis est detrimentum.

So the soul that is subject to God is not subject to human power; for from him it hopes for the fruit of eternal life and the help of perpetual salvation. He, then, to whom I have given myself, will protect me when slain, will raise me when dead, and will avenge me when killed. The righteous man was snatched away, lest wickedness should change his heart. So this death is rather a flight from sin than a loss for the one who dies.

Explanation 61, chapter 18

61.18.1CSEL 64:388

Etenim ipse est deus meus, adiutor meus, defensor meus; non mouebor amplius. qui labitur, commouetur, eo quod de integritatis et innocentiae suae quadam statione defluat. semel enim in petra Christi locatus lubricum non debet habere uestigium, sed tenere status proprii firmamentum;

“For he is my God, my helper, my defender; I shall be moved no more.” He who slips is moved, because he slides from a certain standing-place of his integrity and innocence. For one once placed on the rock of Christ ought not to have a slippery footing, but to hold the firmness of his own standing;

61.18.2CSEL 64:388–389

unde immobilis dicitur qui seruat Immobilem uoluntatem et propositum aliquod intentione animi fidelis exequitur. nam et dei immobilem uoluntatem legimus, sicut habes ad Hebraeos: in quo amplius deus ostendere nolens heredibus repromissionis immobilitatem uoluntatis suae interposuit ius iurandum. recte ergo immobilis uoluntas dei quae nullius peccati mouetur illecebris; homines mobiles, lubrici ad delinquendum, faciles ad errandum. denique de Iudaeis dictum est: transeuntes autem blasphemabant eum mouentes capita sua, et ipse dominus in psalmo ait: omnes qui uidebant me aspernabantur me et locuti sunt labiis et mouerunt caput.

hence he is called immovable who keeps an immovable will and carries out a purpose with the intention of a faithful mind. For we read of the immovable will of God too, as you have in Hebrews: “In which God, wishing to show more abundantly to the heirs of the promise the immovability of his will, interposed an oath.” Rightly, then, the will of God is immovable, which is moved by the enticements of no sin; men are movable, slippery to offend, easy to err. Finally it was said of the Jews: “Those who passed by blasphemed him, shaking their heads”, and the Lord himself says in the psalm: “All who saw me despised me, and spoke with their lips and shook their heads.”

61.18.3CSEL 64:389

caput omnium Christus est; melius est igitur ut maneat Christus in nobis quam aliqua nostri commotione moueatur. unde Iudaei mouentes capita sua dicebant: tolle a terra talem hunc, Geraseni rogabant, ut de finibus eorum recederet, ecclesia autem tenuit eum nec dimisit eum. ideo illa quae tenuit eum possidet, illi qui mouerunt tenere non possunt. pulchre autem ait euangelista, quia transeuntes mouebant capita sua, transeuntes, non stantes. stamus in atriis sanctis, praeterimus in plateis. sacerdos praeteriit.

Christ is the head of all; it is better, then, that Christ should remain in us than be moved by any movement of ours. Hence the Jews, shaking their heads, said: “Away with such a man from the earth”; the Gerasenes begged him to depart from their borders; but the church held him and did not let him go. Therefore she who held him possesses him; those who moved him cannot hold him. Beautifully the evangelist says that those passing by shook their heads — passing by, not standing. We stand in the holy courts; we pass by in the streets. The priest passed by,

61.18.4CSEL 64:389

leuita pertransiuit, stetit ille qui uulnera inflicta curauit. et ideo illi non dixerunt qui transibant uiam: benedictio domini super uos, benedicimus uos de domo domini; stantes enim, non transeuntes sunt pedes benedicentium. denique et uineam, cuius soluta munitio est, transeuntes uindemiant, non manentes; transeuntes sibilant, sicut in Threnis Hieremiae legimus: tenuerunt super te manus omnes transeuntes per uiam, sibilauerunt et mouerunt caput suum super filiam Hierusalem.

the Levite passed by; he stood who healed the wounds inflicted. And therefore “those who passed by the way did not say: The blessing of the Lord be upon you; we bless you from the house of the Lord”; for the feet of those who bless are standing, not passing by. Finally those who pass by, not those who remain, pluck the grapes of the vineyard whose fence has been broken down; those who pass by hiss, as we read in the Lamentations of Jeremiah: “All who pass by the way have clapped their hands over you; they have hissed and shaken their heads over the daughter of Jerusalem.”

61.18.5CSEL 64:389–390

Ideo sacerdos non potuit coronari, leuita non potuit, quia transierunt et tamquam umbra praeterierunt; Stephanus autem martyrio coronatus est, quia stantem uidebat dominum Iesum immobilem, non praetereuntem. immobilis ergo fide Stephanus immobilem Christum uidebat, nullo erat mortis timore commotus; non mouit se Stephanus, non mouit et Christus. commoti sunt filii proditoris, de quibus dicitur: commoti amoueantur filii eius et mendicent; eget enim medico qui mouetur. inops peccator, diues est iustus, quia nullo bono deficit qui dominum semper inquirit.

Therefore the priest could not be crowned, nor the Levite, because they passed by and went by like a shadow; but Stephen was crowned with martyrdom, because he saw the Lord Jesus standing immovable, not passing by. So Stephen, immovable in faith, saw the immovable Christ, and was moved by no fear of death; Stephen did not move himself, nor did Christ move. The sons of the traitor were moved, of whom it is said: “Let his sons be moved away and beg”; for he who is moved needs a physician. The sinner is poor, the righteous man is rich, because he lacks no good who always seeks the Lord.

Explanation 61, chapter 19

61.19.1CSEL 64:390

Et quia inde tractus est sermo, quia dixit: non mouebor amplius, quod moueri ad culpam sit, ostendit ipse Dauid dicens: qui posuit animam meam ad uitam et non dedit commoueri pedes meos. unde et sancto dicitur a domino deo nostro:

And since the discussion has been drawn from his saying, “I shall be moved no more”, that to be moved is to fall into guilt David himself shows, saying: “Who has set my soul to life and has not let my feet be moved.” Hence it is also said to the saint by the Lord our God:

61.19.2CSEL 64:390

tu autem hic sta mecum, quoniam qui deo proximus est lapsui non potest esse uicinus. omnis enim culpa uelut aduersario nisu de loco deicere et de proprio statu mentem mouere consueuit; quod uel ab hoste uel ab luctamine tractum uidetur. perturbat ira, incendit libido, stimulat inuidia, excruciat auaritia, timor deicit, maeror affligit. et Petro dictum est a domino Iesu: ueni retro post me. non dixit: ueni retro — hoc enim diabolo soli dixit —, sed: ueni retro post me;

“But you, stand here with me”, since one who is near to God cannot be near to falling. For every fault, as by a hostile effort, is accustomed to throw the mind from its place and move it from its proper standing; which seems drawn either from an enemy or from wrestling. Anger disturbs, lust inflames, envy goads, avarice torments, fear casts down, grief afflicts. And to Peter it was said by the Lord Jesus: “Come back behind me.” He did not say “Come back” — for that he said to the devil alone —, but “Come back behind me”;

61.19.3CSEL 64:390

non est enim retro qui post Christum est. sed quia errabat Petrus, sicut dominus ipse ait ad ipsum: quia non sapis, inquit, quae dei sunt sed quae sunt hominum, ideo post me ueni, ut incipias non humana, sed diuina sentire. ideo et hic iustus rapiendus e terris ait: non mouebor amplius; dissolui enim et cum Christo esse multo melius. non enim labi poterit qui coeperit esse cum Christo, quia mors iusto non naturae finis, sed culpae est.

for he is not behind who is after Christ. But since Peter was in error, as the Lord himself says to him: “For you do not savour,” he says, “the things of God but the things of men”, therefore come behind me, so that you may begin to think not human but divine things. And therefore this righteous man too, about to be snatched from the earth, says: “I shall be moved no more”; for to be dissolved and to be with Christ is much better. For he cannot slip who has begun to be with Christ, because for the righteous death is the end not of nature but of guilt.

Explanation 61, chapter 20

61.20.1CSEL 64:390

Inter has uoces subito uidet agmina persequentium et inter pericula positus non de se sollicitus, sed de his, quos liberare cupiebat, ait: quo usque irruitis in hominem, interficientes uniuersos? si me quaeritis, cur alios uultis occidere?

Amid these words he suddenly sees the troops of pursuers and, set amid dangers, anxious not for himself but for those he wished to free, he says: “How long will you rush upon a man, killing all? If you seek me, why do you wish to kill others?”

61.20.2CSEL 64:390–391

offero me ipse pro multis, quia pro omnibus solus se ille potuit offerre qui auctor est omnium. ipsius ergo quem sequebatur imitator ait: si me quaeritis sinite hos abire, ut impleatur sermo quem dixit Iesus: quia non perdidi ex ipsis quemquam praeter unum — hoc enim in alio libro sententia domini comprehendit — qui tamen sua magis periit uoluntate quam mea, inquit, seueritate punitus est.

“I offer myself for many”, because he alone who is the author of all could offer himself for all. So the imitator of him whom he followed says: “If you seek me, let these go”, so that the word which Jesus spoke might be fulfilled: “That I have lost none of them except one” — for the Lord’s sentence includes this in another book —, who yet perished rather by his own will than, he says, was punished by my severity.

61.20.3CSEL 64:391

et cum ego me sponte offeram, irruitis et incumbitis tamquam parieti inclinato et maceriae inpulsae, hoc est: apex dudum nobilis sedis Augustae et circumfusi toto orbe Romano ualidus quondam murus imperii sicut paries inclinatus aut maceries inpulsa collabor.

“And though I offer myself of my own accord, you rush and press upon me as on a leaning wall and a tottering fence”, that is: I, lately the noble summit of the August seat and once the strong wall of the empire spread over the whole Roman world, collapse like a leaning wall or a pushed fence.

Explanation 61, chapter 21

61.21.1CSEL 64:391

Sed esto, ad mortem me usque appetierunt, quaesierunt ad necem dicentes: tollamus iustum, tollamus misericordem, quia grauis est nobis etiam ad uidendum: sed etiam existimationem meam, castimoniam meam sauciandam falsis calumniis putauerunt. hoc est enim: pretium meum cogitauerunt repellere, quia pretium nostrum pudicitia est, quae nos separat a pecudibus, angelis iungit; pretium nostrum misericordia est, quae nos, dum confertur inopibus, redimit a morte; pretium nostrum fides est, quae omnes homines gentili errore et seruitute depressos Christo adquisiuit; pretium nostrum bona existimatio est, qua uniuscuiusque nostrum meritorum series aestimatur; pretium nostrum munditia atque simplicitas est, quia scriptum est: possessio pretiosa uir mundus; nihil enim pretiosius uiro simplici.

“But be it so: they attacked me even to death, they sought me for slaughter, saying: Let us take away the righteous, let us take away the merciful, because he is burdensome to us even to look at. But they also thought my reputation, my chastity, should be wounded by false accusations.” For this is: “They thought to reject my price”, because our price is chastity, which separates us from beasts and joins us to angels; our price is mercy, which, when it is given to the needy, redeems us from death; our price is faith, which has gained for Christ all men weighed down by gentile error and slavery; our price is good reputation, by which the course of each one’s merits is valued; our price is purity and simplicity, because it is written: “A pure man is a precious possession”; for nothing is more precious than a simple man.

61.21.2CSEL 64:391–392

unde apostolus pulchre: abundauit, inquit, in diuitiis simplicitatis suae. quid enim simplicitate ditius, quae sicut bonus pater familias satis sibi abundat et sua puritate contenta non quaerit alienum nec abrodit, sed de se ceteris fundit? innocens enim credit omni uerbo nec se in artes uarias saepe commutat sicut astutia, quae, ut sit cauta, timet omnia nec se consiliis suis credit, uersat suas ipsa sententias; simplicitas autem timere nil nouit. hoc igitur genere pretium iusti repellere temptauerunt, etsi possit et illud intellegi, quia aurum eius manibus accipiebant, corde intimo repellebant, praedam tenentes, fidem negantes.

Hence the apostle beautifully says: “It abounded,” he says, “in the riches of their simplicity.” For what is richer than simplicity, which, like a good householder, abounds sufficiently for itself and, content with its own purity, does not seek another’s nor gnaw at it, but pours from itself to others? For the innocent man believes every word and does not often change himself into various arts, like cunning, which, to be cautious, fears everything and does not trust its own counsels, but turns its opinions over and over; but simplicity knows no fear. In this way, then, they tried to reject the price of the righteous; though that too can be understood: that they received his gold with their hands and rejected it in their inmost heart, holding the booty, denying the faith.

Explanation 61, chapter 22

61.22.1CSEL 64:392

Unde et ait: cucurri in siti, eo quod fidem quaereret et inuenire non posset, destitutus a sociis, a propriis derelictus. sic dominum Iesum legimus in euangelio et esurisse et sitisse, cum esuriret fidem nostram, sitiret opera nostra, quaerere uideretur aliena. aut, ut ad sitim corporis referamus, quanta indignitate dicit: cucurri in siti! hoc est: ego sitiebam, cum alii mea uina ructarent, et ex illo suggestu sublimis imperii opulentiaque regali ad extrema sitis plebeia quadam uilitate deductus sum.

Hence he also says: “I ran in thirst”, because he sought faith and could not find it, deserted by his allies, abandoned by his own. So we read in the gospel that the Lord Jesus both hungered and thirsted, when he hungered for our faith and thirsted for our works, and seemed to seek what belonged to others. Or, to refer it to bodily thirst, with what indignity he says: “I ran in thirst”, that is: I was thirsting, while others were belching my wine, and from that lofty seat of empire and royal wealth I was brought down to the extremes of thirst with a kind of common baseness.

Explanation 61, chapter 23

61.23.1CSEL 64:392

Et quia Graecus habet ἔδραμον, quod significat et cucurri singulariter et cucurrerunt pluraliter, potest et sic intellegi: cucurrerunt in siti, quorum fauces aestu nimio fundendi mei sanguinis aruerunt. sicut enim est sitis fidei, ita est et perfidiae. sitim illam iustus sitit, qui ait: sitiuit anima mea ad te, deus, istam perfidi, quorum lingua prae siti aruit; quam sitiuit

And since the Greek has edramon, which means both “I ran” in the singular and “they ran” in the plural, it can also be understood thus: “They ran in thirst”, whose throats were dried up by the excessive heat of shedding my blood. For as there is a thirst of faith, so there is one of faithlessness. That thirst the righteous man thirsts, who says: “My soul has thirsted for you, O God”; this one the faithless, whose tongue has dried up for thirst; with which he thirsted

61.23.2CSEL 64:392

ille, qui inter conuiuii dapes et pocula constitutus innocentis conuiuae necem moliebatur Augusti. nonne tibi uidebatur, impie, cum manducares, caedem parares, quod humana sub dentibus tuis ossa crepitarent? cum uinum biberes et parricidium cogitares, quod illis poculis sanguinem tibi innocentis infunderes? ita prorsus alienus non solum ab imitatione, sed etiam a lectione diuina, ut non tibi ueniret in mentem uersiculus ille psalmorum: tu uero, homo unanimis, dux meus et notus meus, qui simul mecum dulces capiebas cibos, atque ille alius, cuius meminit in euangelio ipse dominus Iesus: qui edebat mecum panem leuauit super me calcaneum suum?

who, set amid the dishes and cups of a banquet, was plotting the death of the innocent Augustus, his table companion. Did it not seem to you, wicked man, while you ate and prepared the slaughter, that human bones were cracking under your teeth? While you drank wine and plotted parricide, that you were pouring yourself the blood of the innocent in those cups? So utterly a stranger were you not only to imitation of divine Scripture but even to reading it, that that verse of the psalms did not come to your mind: “But you, a man of one mind with me, my guide and my familiar friend, who took sweet food with me”, and that other, which the Lord Jesus himself recalls in the gospel: “He who ate bread with me has lifted up his heel against me.”

Explanation 61, chapter 24

61.24.1CSEL 64:392–393

Quid tibi faciam, Ephraim? quid tibi faciam, Iuda? plures reliquisti nobis proditionis tuae et fraudis heredes; hoc enim etiam ad proditorem ludam potest per apostropham deriuari. prodidisti uitam, regnum domino. sed Iesus dominus semel in se, frequenter in seruulis suis proditur; quod enim uni horum minimorum fecistis, mihi, inquit, fecistis. tu commissos tibi loculos et pecunias pauperum suscepisti, iste prouincias sibi creditas; tu apostoli honorem, ille militiae dignitatem, administrationis infulas. numero honores eius, ut crimen exaggerem.

“What shall I do to you, Ephraim? What shall I do to you, Judah?” You have left us many heirs of your betrayal and deceit; for this too can be turned by apostrophe to Judas the traitor. You betrayed life, the kingdom, to the Lord. But the Lord Jesus is betrayed once in himself, often in his servants; for “what you did to one of the least of these, you did to me,” he says. You received the purse entrusted to you and the money of the poor, this man the provinces entrusted to him; you the honour of an apostle, he the dignity of military command, the insignia of administration. I count his honours, so as to heap up his crime.

61.24.2CSEL 64:393

conuiuii uiolastis uterque consortium; tu tamen de conuiuio ad proditionem surrexisti, iste ad necem; hoc est: tu, licet in scelere, uerecundior, qui negasti, quod inferendam necem credideris domino quem prodebas, qui pretium refudisti, ne residere apud te merces parricidii uideretur; iste non solum tenuit acceptam, uerum etiam extorsit non oblatam mercedem proditionis, iste non solum deceptus non est alieno mendacio, sed fefellit suo, et fefellit ut occideret.

Both of you violated the fellowship of the table; yet you rose from the supper to betrayal, this man to murder; that is: you, though in crime, more modest, who denied that you believed death would be brought on the Lord whom you betrayed, who paid back the price, lest the wages of parricide seem to remain with you; this man not only kept the wages of betrayal he received, but even extorted those not offered; this man not only was not deceived by another’s lie, but deceived by his own, and deceived so as to kill.

61.24.3CSEL 64:393

et cum ille conuiuium recusaret qui se uideret esse perimendum, iste sacramentum obtulit, ne qua periret sibi cumulandi pars criminis. postremo superioris proditoris pecunia profecit ad sepulturam peregrinorum, iste sepulturam integram suo principi denegauit.

And when the one who saw he was to be killed refused the banquet, this man offered an oath, lest any part of heaping up the crime should be lost to him. Finally, the money of the former traitor served for the burial of strangers; this man denied burial altogether to his prince.

Explanation 61, chapter 25

61.25.1CSEL 64:393

Nec defuit qui manus lauaret dicens: innocens sum a sanguine iusti huius; in quo se Pilatus non diluit, sed inquinauit et implicauit, non exuit. nam etsi nullum pondus in perditorum iudiciis, tamen uinculum maius in confessionibus. iustos enim non aliena absoluit sententia, sed sua uita; iniusti se ipsos uehementius suis uocibus alligant, qui alios alligare non possunt. tamen, ne huic quoque deesse confessio propria uideretur;

Nor was there lacking one to wash his hands, saying: “I am innocent of the blood of this righteous man”; by which Pilate did not wash himself clean but defiled and entangled himself, did not free himself. For though there is no weight in the judgments of the lost, there is yet a greater bond in confessions. For it is not another’s sentence that absolves the righteous, but their own life; the unjust bind themselves more strongly by their own words, who cannot bind others. Yet, lest this man too should seem to lack his own confession,

61.25.2CSEL 64:393

iurauit, ut peiuraret, lauit manus, cum euangelium tangeret, ne quid deesset exemplo, lauit aqua manus, ut sceleratius inquinaret innocentis sanguine. nec Herodes defuit, cui alter Pilatus se placiturum credidit, si captum principem destinasset.

he swore so as to perjure himself, he washed his hands while touching the gospel, so that nothing should be lacking to the example; he washed his hands with water, so as to defile them more wickedly with innocent blood. Nor was Herod lacking, to whom another Pilate believed he would be pleasing if he sent the captured prince.

61.25.3CSEL 64:393–394

quid illud quoque dicam, quod is quoque uestem dealbatam indutus est ad illudendum, postea quoque regia ueste donatus est ad moriendum, ne amisisse honorem debitum uideretur? nam etsi scelere interiit, ius tamen collatae sibi potestatis etiam mortuus reseruabat eorum ipsorum, a quibus negabatur; uel ministerio uel assensu.

Why should I mention that too, that he too was dressed in a white robe for mockery, and afterwards was given a royal robe for dying, lest he seem to have lost the honour due to him? For although he perished by crime, he yet kept, even when dead, the right of the power conferred on him from those very men by whom it was denied, either by their service or by their assent.

Explanation 61, chapter 26

61.26.1CSEL 64:394

Addebatur huic tanto sceleri pompa feralis, nisi is, qui inpatienter ista deflebat, cognitis quae parabantur iusto commotus dolore increpasset uictorem superbum tyrannis illa, non regibus inferri solere. sic horrore flagitii excitus deposuit taeterrimi sceleris apparatum. nec petitor igitur sepulturae defuit, etsi Ioseph ille qui iustus dicebatur defuit. sed longe Maximus saeuior denegabat quod Pilatus ipse auferre non potuit. in quo parricidae humanitas defuit, innocenti tamen non defuit gratia et ad tempus assumpta patientia uindicta paululum comperendinata est.

A funeral procession would have been added to this great crime, had not the one who was bitterly lamenting these things, on learning what was being prepared, moved by just grief, rebuked the proud victor, saying that such things were usually inflicted on tyrants, not on kings. So, stirred by the horror of the deed, he put aside the apparatus of that foulest crime. Nor was there lacking one to ask for burial, even though that Joseph who was called righteous was lacking. But Maximus, far more cruel, denied what Pilate himself could not take away. In this the parricide lacked humanity, but grace did not fail the innocent, and, patience having been taken up for a time, vengeance has been postponed a little.

Explanation 61, chapter 27

61.27.1CSEL 64:394

Ideoque ait: uerumtamen deo subiecta est anima mea, quoniam ab ipso est patientia mea. quia ipse est deus meus et salutaris meus, susceptor meus; non emigrabo. hoc est: numquid sepultura negata corporis perpetuae quietis mansionem mihi abstulit? habeo habitaculum

And therefore he says: “Yet my soul is subject to God, since from him is my patience. For he is my God and my salvation, my protector; I shall not move away.” That is: Has the denial of burial for my body taken from me the dwelling of everlasting rest? I have my dwelling

61.27.2CSEL 64:394

meum in domini tabernaculo et in sancto eius monte requiescam. non emigrabo humano scelere, quia domini fauore susceptus sum, quia neque mors neque gladius neque tribulatio a caritate Christi me separare poterunt. non enim innocens de tabernaculis iustorum, sed peccator emigrat. migrant Iudae proditoris heredes, de quibus et similibus eorum merito dicitur: commoti amoueantur filii eius et mendicent, eiciantur de habitaculis suis.

in the Lord’s tabernacle, and on his holy mountain I shall rest. I shall not move away through human crime, because I have been received by the Lord’s favour, because neither death nor sword nor tribulation will be able to separate me from the love of Christ. For it is not the innocent but the sinner who moves away from the tabernacles of the righteous. The heirs of Judas the traitor move away, of whom and of those like them it is rightly said: “Let his sons be moved away and beg; let them be cast out of their dwellings.”

Explanation 61, chapter 28

61.28.1CSEL 64:394–395

Quod bene et ad dominum Iesum Christum refertur, qui cum descendisset in terras, crucifigeretur, sepeliretur, non emigrauit a patre, sed in patre mansit: traditus sum et non egrediebar. nec deposuit quod erat, sed reseruauit, nec desiuit esse in forma dei, sed perseuerauit, non inminuta per susceptionem corporis dei gloria, sed manente triumphum adquisiuit, potentiam non amisit. unde ipse ait: a modo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem ad dexteram uirtutis.

This is also well referred to the Lord Jesus Christ, who, when he had come down to earth, was crucified and buried, did not move away from the Father but remained in the Father: “I was delivered up and did not go out.” Nor did he lay aside what he was, but kept it; nor did he cease to be in the form of God, but persevered, the glory of God not lessened by taking on the body, but, remaining, he won a triumph and did not lose his power. Hence he himself says: “From now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power.”

Explanation 61, chapter 29

61.29.1CSEL 64:395

Unde conuocatos gentium populos et adquisitos patri suo sanguine hortatur ad fidem dicens: sperate in eum, omnis conuentus plebis meae, hoc est non solus Israel, sed omnis, inquit, nec solae reliquiae, sed etiam gentium plenitudo, nec solae gentes, sed Israel; cum enim intrauerit plenitudo gentium, tunc omnis Israel saluus erit. quis potest diuina mysteria comprehendere?

Hence he exhorts to faith the peoples of the nations called together and gained for his Father by his blood, saying: “Hope in him, all the assembly of my people”, that is, not Israel alone, but all, he says; not the remnant alone, but also the fullness of the gentiles; not the gentiles alone, but Israel; for when the fullness of the gentiles has come in, then all Israel will be saved. Who can comprehend the divine mysteries?

61.29.2CSEL 64:395

quorum tanta multitudo est, ut iure Paulus miretur meritoque dixerit: o altitudo diuitiarum sapientiae et scientiae dei! repulsae gentes sunt, ut eligeretur Israel; caecatus est postea Israel propter uocationem gentium et caecati Israel reliquiae secundum electionem gratiae saluae factae sunt, postquam intrauit gentium plenitudo. ita culpa Israel profuit gentibus, fides gentium Israeliten populum liberauit.

So great is their multitude that Paul rightly marvels and rightly said: “O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God!” The gentiles were rejected, so that Israel might be chosen; afterwards Israel was blinded because of the calling of the gentiles, and the remnant of blinded Israel was saved according to the election of grace, after the fullness of the gentiles came in. So the fault of Israel profited the gentiles, the faith of the gentiles freed the Israelite people.

Explanation 61, chapter 30

61.30.1CSEL 64:395

Effundite, inquit, coram illo corda uestra. qui induit fidem, prius perfidiam debet exuere, euacuare cor suum omni labe malitiae, ut capax fiat cor eius gratiae spiritalis. ideoque apostolus ait: renouamini spiritu mentis uestrae; cum enim effunditur uetus malitia, noua sumitur gratia, qua unusquisque renouatur.

“Pour out,” he says, “your hearts before him.” He who puts on faith must first put off faithlessness, empty his heart of every stain of malice, so that his heart may become capable of spiritual grace. And therefore the apostle says: “Be renewed in the spirit of your mind”; for when old malice is poured out, new grace is taken up, by which each one is renewed.

61.30.2CSEL 64:395–396

dicit ergo filius dei: effundite coram illo corda uestra, quia sciebat patrem esse dicturum: effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem. est etiam illa traditio, ut cor nostrum uideamur effundere, quando omnes cogitationes alicui et uoluntates nostri cordis aperimus. ergo iactemus in deum cogitationes nostras nec aliquid eum latere credamus. effundimus cor nostrum coram ipso, cum disceptationes exinanimus humanas

So the Son of God says: “Pour out your hearts before him”, because he knew that the Father would say: “I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh.” There is also that usage, that we seem to pour out our heart when we open all our thoughts and the wishes of our heart to someone. So let us cast our thoughts on God and not believe that anything is hidden from him. We pour out our heart before him when we empty out human disputings.

Explanation 61, chapter 31

61.31.1CSEL 64:396

Uerumtamen uani filii hominum, mendaces filii hominum in stateris ut decipiant. si uani filii hominum et mendaces filii hominum, possunt non uani esse filii dei, qui non ex sanguine neque ex uoluntate carnis neque ex uoluntate uiri, sed ex deo nati sunt. nam filii hominum uidentur sibi ponderare aequitatem et grauitate seuerioris iudicii examinare iustitiam, duri aliis, remissi (sibi), operibus iniqui, sermone censores. unde Salomon ait:

“But vain are the sons of men, the sons of men are liars in the balances, so as to deceive.” If the sons of men are vain and the sons of men liars, the sons of God, who are born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of a man, but of God, can be not vain. For the sons of men seem to themselves to weigh equity and to examine justice with the gravity of stricter judgment: hard on others, lax (on themselves), unjust in works, censors in speech. Hence Solomon says:

61.31.2CSEL 64:396

execrabile domino duplex pondus et statera fallax non bona. in quo significat eos, qui rapinam inexplebili corde meditantur et sobrietatem fronte praetendunt. tales scribae Iudaeorum sunt, qui onera grauia aliis obseruantiae durioris inponunt non habentes rectum iugum animae suae, sed propensa iniquitate curuati, ipsi autem suorum refugi praeceptorum sunt. inuenitur itaque in auaritia, tamquam in radice uitiorum omnium, quae sit caput iniquitatis et fomes, quam homo renuntians mundo et consepultus Christo per baptismatis sacramentum, qui sit mortuus saeculo, declinare debet atque defugere.

“A double weight is an abomination to the Lord, and a false balance is not good.” By this he signifies those who plan robbery with insatiable heart and put on a show of sobriety on their face. Such are the scribes of the Jews, who lay heavy burdens of harsher observance on others, not having a straight yoke for their own soul, but bent by inclined iniquity, while they themselves flee their own precepts. So avarice is found to be, as it were, the root of all vices, the head and kindling of iniquity, which a man who has renounced the world and been buried with Christ through the sacrament of baptism, who has died to the world, ought to avoid and flee.

Explanation 61, chapter 32

61.32.1CSEL 64:396

Nolite, inquit, sperare in iniquitate et rapinam nolite concupiscere; diuitiae si fluant, nolite cor apponere. uides quia affluunt; non uides quia praeterfluunt? nudus es natus, nudus moriturus es. quid excipere quaeris quod tecum auferre non possis? fluenta sunt quae miraris; quomodo ueniunt, sic transeunt et recedunt. solus Iordanis retrorsum conuersus est, in quem descendisti, qui te admonet, ut in

“Do not,” he says, “hope in iniquity, and do not desire robbery; if riches flow, do not set your heart on them.” You see that they flow in; do you not see that they flow past? Naked you were born, naked you will die. Why do you seek to receive what you cannot take with you? They are streams that you admire; as they come, so they pass and recede. Only the Jordan was turned back, into which you went down, which warns you to

61.32.2CSEL 64:396

ipsum naturae fontem et originem reuertaris, quae te nudum, non ueste amictum edidit, ut discas superflua non requirere. hoc, quod erubescis esse te nudum, culpa docuit, non natura; nulla enim esset uerecundia genitalium, si culpa non esset. neque enim cetera animalia uestiuntur ut tegantur neque uestiuntur ut muniantur; satis munita sunt omnia naturae suae tegmine.

return to the very fountain and origin of nature, which brought you forth naked, not clothed in a garment, so that you may learn not to seek superfluous things. That you blush to be naked, guilt taught, not nature; for there would be no shame of the genitals if there were no guilt. For the other animals are neither clothed to be covered nor clothed to be protected; all are sufficiently protected by the covering of their own nature.

61.32.3CSEL 64:396–397

nos dum superflua quaerimus, tegmen naturae amisimus, ius commune perdidimus. ideoque in hoc psalmo ascribitur doctrina medicabilis, quia uel Idithun uel se ipsum illius nomine exercitio spiritali subeundis temptationibus erudiuit, ut in angustiis quis positus subiciat se deo et, si peccauit ante, peccare desistat nec recidiuo errore moueatur.

We, while we seek superfluous things, have lost the covering of nature and forfeited the common right. And therefore in this psalm a healing teaching is ascribed, because either Jeduthun, or himself under his name, he trained by spiritual exercise for undergoing temptations, so that one set in distress may subject himself to God and, if he has sinned before, may cease to sin and not be moved by relapsing error.

Explanation 61, chapter 33

61.33.1CSEL 64:397

Semel locutus est deus, duo haec audiui. semel locutus est deus et plura audita sunt, quia non per litteras et syllabas est locutus. locutus est per aenigmata, locutus est per uisiones, locutus est per diuisiones gratiarum, locutus est per spiritum singulorum; nos autem plura loquimur et uix audimur. semel locutus in lege est, eadem iterum locutus est in euangelio.

“Once God has spoken; these two things I have heard.” God spoke once and many things were heard, because he did not speak by letters and syllables. He spoke through riddles, he spoke through visions, he spoke through the divisions of graces, he spoke through the spirit of each one; but we speak many things and are scarcely heard. He spoke once in the law; the same things he spoke again in the gospel.

61.33.2CSEL 64:397

aut fortasse, ut ego puto, quia multifariam locutus est in prophetis, nouissime autem locutus est in filio suo, semel locutus est, quando locutus in filio est, et audita sunt etiam illa, quae ante audita non erant ab his quibus locutus fuerat per prophetas. semel ergo locutus est in nouo testamento et uetus auditum est testamentum quod non audiebatur, quia ipse dominus dixit de populo Iudaeorum: uidebunt et non uidebunt, audient et non audient. audient aure corporea, sed non audient mentis auditu.

Or perhaps, as I think, since he spoke in many ways in the prophets but last of all spoke in his Son, he spoke once when he spoke in the Son, and then those things too were heard which had not been heard before by those to whom he had spoken through the prophets. So he spoke once in the New Testament, and the Old Testament, which was not heard, was heard; because the Lord himself said of the people of the Jews: “They will see and not see, they will hear and not hear.” They will hear with the bodily ear, but they will not hear with the hearing of the mind.

Explanation 61, chapter 34

61.34.1CSEL 64:397

Nobis ergo, hoc est ecclesiae semel locutus est et duo audita sunt, quia in illa audiuimus et intelleximus, quae non intellexerant qui legerunt, non audierunt qui audierunt. solus enim Christus aurem aperuit humanam ad cognoscenda mysteria, solus libri signaculum soluit et resoluit aenigmata prophetarum.

So to us, that is, to the church, he spoke once and two things were heard, because in it we have heard and understood what those who read it did not understand, what those who heard it did not hear. For Christ alone opened the human ear to know the mysteries, he alone loosed the seal of the book and solved the riddles of the prophets.

Explanation 61, chapter 35

61.35.1CSEL 64:397–398

Ideoque ipse reddet unicuique secundum opera sua; in quo et qualitatem operum comprehendit, ut aut conplurium et meliorum restituat praemia meritis singulorum aut contra et numero grauemur et acerbitate meritorum.

And therefore he will render to each according to his works; in which he includes also the quality of works, so that he either restores to the merits of each the rewards of more and better works, or, on the contrary, we are weighed down both by the number and by the bitterness of our deserts.