On Man's Perfection in Righteousness 38–44

Latin text: Urba–Zycha, CSEL 42 (Latin text: Urba–Zycha, De perfectione iustitiae hominis (CSEL 42), digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 5 (1887), "A Treatise Concerning Man’s Perfection in Righteousness.".

Show

Chapter 38

38CSEL 42:38–39

Item dicunt, inquit, quia non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens, et huic testimonio quasi respondit ad nihil aliud, nisi ut scripturae sanctae se litigare uideantur, quarum concordiam nos debemus ostendere. ait enim: quibus respondendum est, quod de sancto Zacharia euangelista testatur dicens: erant autem Zacharias et Elisabeth uxor eius iusti ambo in conspectu domini et incedentes in omnibus mandatis et iustificationibus domini sine querella. qui iusti ambo utique legerant inter ipsa mandata, quemadmodum sua peccata mundarent. nam Zacharias, quod de omni sacerdote ex hominibus accepto in epistula ad Hebraeos dicitur, etiam pro suis peccatis utique hostias offerebat. quomodo autem intellegendum sit quod dicitur sine querella, iam supra satis, quantum opinor, ostendimus. et beatus, inquit, apostolus ait: ut simus sancti et inmaculati in conspectu eius. hoc agitur, ut hoc simus, si inmaculati intellegendi sunt qui omnino sine peccato sunt; si autem inmaculati sunt qui sunt sine crimine, etiam in hac uita fuisse atque esse negare non possumus, quia non ideo sine ullo peccato est aliquis, quoniam non habet maculam criminis. unde et apostolus cum ministros eligeret ordinandos, non ait: si quis sine peccato — quod inuenire non posset — sed ait: si quis sine crimine, quod utique posset. nec tamen iste ostendit, quemadmodum secundum suam causam debeamus accipere quod scriptum est: quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens. aperta quippe sententia est de superiore uersu inlustrius declarata. ne intres, inquit, in iudicium cum seruo tuo, quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens. iudicium timet, quia misericordiam desiderat, quae superexsultat iudicio. hoc est enim ne intres in iudicium cum seruo tuo: noli me iudicare secundum te, qui es sine peccato, quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens, quod de hac uita dictum sine difficili quaestione intellegitur. et quod ait: non iustificabitur, ad illam perfectionem iustitiae retulit, quae in hac uita non est.

“Also they say,” he says, “‘For no one living will be justified in your sight’”; and to this testimony he replied, as it were, to no other effect than to make the holy Scriptures seem to quarrel, whose harmony we ought to show. For he says: “They must be answered with what the evangelist testifies of holy Zechariah, saying: ‘And Zechariah and Elizabeth his wife were both righteous in the sight of the Lord, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord without complaint.’” These two righteous people had certainly read, among those very commandments, how they should cleanse their sins. For Zechariah, as the letter to the Hebrews says of every priest taken from among men, certainly offered sacrifices for his own sins too. And how “without complaint” should be understood we have, I think, sufficiently shown above. “And the blessed apostle,” he says, “says: ‘That we should be holy and without blemish in his sight.’” This is being done so that we may be this, if those without blemish are to be understood as those who are altogether without sin; but if those without blemish are those who are without crime, we cannot deny that there have been such even in this life and are such, because someone is not without any sin just because he has no blemish of crime. Hence the apostle too, when choosing ministers to be ordained, did not say, “if anyone is without sin” (which he could not find), but, “if anyone is without crime,” which he certainly could. Yet he did not show how, according to his case, we should take what is written, “For no one living will be justified in your sight.” For the meaning is plain, declared more clearly by the preceding verse: “Do not enter into judgment with your servant,” he says, “for no one living will be justified in your sight.” He fears judgment because he desires mercy, which triumphs over judgment. For this is the meaning of “Do not enter into judgment with your servant”: “Do not judge me according to yourself, who are without sin; for no one living will be justified in your sight”; which is understood without difficult question as said of this life. And “will not be justified” he referred to that perfection of righteousness which is not in this life.

Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 5:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Titus 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 3:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Jas 2:13 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Zechariah and Elizabeth were blameless, not sinless, since the priest offered sacrifice for his own sins; Ps 143:2 asks for mercy because no one will be found perfectly righteous in this life.

  • Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX/Vulg.); Luke 1:6; Heb 5:1–3; Eph 1:4; 1 Tim 3:10 and Titus 1:6 (“without crime”); Jas 2:13.

Topics: Heresy, Church office

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 38 (CSEL 42:38–39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-38) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 39

39CSEL 42:39–42

Item dicunt, inquit, si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, ipsi nos seducimus. et ueritas in nobis non est et huic euidentissimo testimonio quasi contrariis testimoniis respondere conatus est, quod idem sanctus Iohannes in eadem epistula dicat: hoc autem dico, fratres, ut non peccetis. omnis qui natus est ex deo peccatum non facit, quia semen ipsius in eo manet, et non potest peccare; item illic: qui natus est ex deo, non peccat. quia generatio dei conseruat eum, et malignus non tangit eum. item illic, inquit, ubi de saluatore ait: quoniam ille apparuit, ut peccata tolleret. omnis qui in eo manet non peccat; omnis qui peccat non uidit eum nec cognouit eum. item illic: carissimi, nunc filii dei sumus, et nondum apparuit quid erimus. scimus quoniam cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum sicuti est. et omnis qui habet spem hanc in eum sanctificat se, sicuti et ipse sanctus est. et tamen cum haec omnia testimonia uera sint, uerum est et illud quod proposuit et non soluit quod si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et ueritas in nobis non est. ac per hoc secundum id, quod ex deo nati sumus, in eo qui apparuit, ut peccata tolleret, id est in Christo manemus et non peccamus — hoc est autem, quod interior renouatur de die in diem — secundum autem quod de homine illo nati sumus, per quem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors, et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, sine peccato non sumus, quia sine illius infirmitate nondum sumus, donec illa renouatione, quae fit de die in diem, quoniam secundum ipsam ex deo nati sumus, infirmitas tota sanetur, in qua ex primo homine nati sumus et in qua sine peccato non sumus. cuius reliquiis in homine interiore manentibus, quamuis de die in diem minuantur in proficientibus, si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et ueritas in nobis non est. quomodo enim uerum est: omnis qui peccat non uidit eum neque cognouit eum, cum secundum uisionem et cognitionem quae erit in specie nemo eum in hac uita uideat atque cognoscat? secundum uisionem autem et cognitionem quae est in fide multi sunt, qui peccent, certe ipsi apostatae, qui tamen in eum aliquando crediderunt, ut de nullo eorum dici possit: secundum uisionem et cognitionem, quae adhuc in fide est, non uidit eum neque cognouit eum. sed intellegendum arbitror, quia renouatio perficienda uidet et cognoscit, infirmitas uero absumenda nec uidet nec cognoscit eum, in cuius quantiscumque reliquiis interius constitutis si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et ueritas in nobis non est. cum ergo per gratiam renouationis filii dei simus, tamen propter reliquias infirmitatis nondum apparuit quod erimus. scimus quoniam cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum sicuti est. tunc peccatum nullum erit, quia infirmitas nec interior nec exterior ulla remanebit. et omnis qui habet hanc spem in eum, sanctificat se, sicut et ipse sanctus est; sanctificat enim se non per se ipsum, sed credendo in illum et inuocando illum qui sanctificat sanctos suos. cuius sanctificationis perfectio, quae nunc proficit et crescit de die in diem, omnes infirmitatis reliquias ablatura est.

“Also they say,” he says, “‘If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.’” And to this most evident testimony he tried to reply with testimonies as if contrary, since the same holy John says in the same letter: “But I say this, brothers, that you may not sin. Everyone who is born of God does not commit sin, because his seed remains in him, and he cannot sin.” Also there: “He who is born of God does not sin, because the generation of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him.” “Also there,” he says, “where he says of the Savior: ‘For he appeared to take away sins. Everyone who remains in him does not sin; everyone who sins has not seen him or known him.’ Also there: ‘Beloved, we are now children of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. And everyone who has this hope in him sanctifies himself, as he also is holy.’” And yet, though all these testimonies are true, that one is true also which he put forward and did not resolve: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” So, according as we are born of God, we remain in him who appeared to take away sins, that is, in Christ, and we do not sin (this is the inner man being renewed day by day); but according as we are born of that man through whom sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so it passed to all men, we are not without sin, because we are not yet without his infirmity, until, by that renewal which takes place day by day, since according to it we are born of God, the whole infirmity is healed in which we were born of the first man and in which we are not without sin. While its remnants remain in the inner man, though they are lessened day by day in those who make progress, if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. For how is it true that “everyone who sins has not seen him or known him,” when, according to the seeing and knowing that will be in sight, no one sees and knows him in this life? But according to the seeing and knowing that is in faith, there are many who sin, certainly the apostates themselves, who nevertheless once believed in him, so that of none of them can it be said, according to the seeing and knowing that is still in faith, that he has not seen him or known him. But I think it is to be understood that the renewal that is being perfected sees and knows him, while the infirmity that is to be consumed neither sees nor knows him; and while any remnants of it, however great, are situated within, if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. Although, then, we are children of God by the grace of renewal, yet because of the remnants of infirmity it has not yet appeared what we shall be. We know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. Then there will be no sin, because no infirmity, inner or outer, will remain. “And everyone who has this hope in him sanctifies himself, as he also is holy”: he sanctifies himself not through himself but by believing in him and calling on him who sanctifies his saints. The perfection of this sanctification, which now progresses and grows day by day, will take away all the remnants of infirmity.

1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: 1 John's texts on not sinning apply to what is born of God in us, while 1 John 1:8 applies to the remaining infirmity inherited from Adam, healed fully only at Christ's appearing.

  • 1 John 1:8; 1 John 2:1; 3:9; 5:18; 3:5–6; 3:2–3; 2 Cor 4:16; Rom 5:12. The backslash after “est” and the digit after “est.” are stray marks in the digital text.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (note marker leaked into the digital text; words joined in the digital text): quiapeccatum → quia peccatum; est.5 et → est. et.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 39 (CSEL 42:39–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-39) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 40

40CSEL 42:42–43

Item dicunt, inquit, non uolentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est dei. quibus respondendum esse dicit, quod idem apostolus alibi de quodam ait: quod uult faciat. item, inquit, ad Philemonem de Onesimo: quem ego uolueram apud me detinere, ut pro te mihi ministraret; sed sine consilio tuo nihil uolui facere, ut non quasi ex necessitate bonum tuum esset, sed uoluntarium. item in Deuteronomio: uitam et mortem dedit ante faciem tuam, bonum et malum. elige uitam, ut uiuas. item apud Salomonem: deus ab initio constituit hominem et reliquit eum in manu consilii sui. adiecit ei mandata et praecepta: si uoles praecepta, seruabunt te et in posterum fidem placitam facere. apposuit tibi aquam et ignem; ad quod uis porrige manum tuam. ante hominem bonum et malum, uita et mors. paupertas et honestas a domino deo sunt. item apud Esaiam: et si uolueritis et audieritis me, quae bona sunt terrae manducabitis; si autem nolueritis nec obaudieritis me, gladius uos comedet; os enim domini locutum est haec. hic uero, quantumlibet isti obtegant, aperiuntur. declarant enim se contra dei gratiam uel misericordiam disputare, quam uolumus impetrare cum dicimus: fiat uoluntas tua sicut in caelo ita et in terra. uel: ne nos inferas in temptationem, sed libera nos a malo. ut quid enim ista orando tanto gemitu petimus, si uolentis hominis et currentis, non miserentis est dei? non quia hoc sine uoluntate nostra agitur, sed quia uoluntas non implet quod agit, nisi diuinitus adiuuetur. haec est fidei sanitas, quae nos facit orare: quaerere, ut inueniamus, petere, ut accipiamus, pulsare, ut aperiatur nobis. contra istam qui disputat, contra se ipsum claudit ostium misericordiae dei. nolo plura dicere de re tanta, quia melius eam committo fidelium gemitibus quam sermonibus meis.

“Also they say,” he says, “‘It is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy.’” He says they must be answered with what the same apostle says elsewhere of a certain man: “Let him do what he wills.” “Also,” he says, “to Philemon, about Onesimus: ‘I wanted to keep him with me, so that he might serve me on your behalf; but I wanted to do nothing without your consent, so that your good deed might not be as if from necessity but voluntary.’ Also in Deuteronomy: ‘He has set life and death before your face, good and evil. Choose life, that you may live.’ Also in Solomon: ‘God from the beginning established man and left him in the hand of his own counsel. He added his commandments and precepts: if you will keep the precepts, they will keep you, and hereafter to do the faith that pleases. He has set before you water and fire; stretch out your hand to whichever you wish. Before man are good and evil, life and death. Poverty and honor are from the Lord God.’ Also in Isaiah: ‘And if you are willing and listen to me, you shall eat the good things of the land; but if you are unwilling and do not listen to me, the sword shall devour you; for the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things.’” Here, however much they cover themselves, they are laid open. For they declare that they argue against the grace or mercy of God, which we wish to obtain when we say, “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven,” or, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” For why do we ask for these things with so much groaning in prayer, if it is of man who wills and runs, not of God who shows mercy? Not that this is done without our will, but that the will does not accomplish what it does unless it is helped by God. This is the soundness of faith that makes us pray: seek, that we may find; ask, that we may receive; knock, that it may be opened to us. Whoever argues against this shuts the door of God's mercy against himself. I do not want to say more about so great a matter, because I commit it better to the groanings of the faithful than to my words.

Rom 9:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Phlm 1:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Phlm 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:7 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Caelestius answers Rom 9:16 with texts on free choice, but by doing so he argues against the mercy we pray for in the Lord's Prayer.

  • Rom 9:16; 1 Cor 7:36; Phlm 13–14; Deut 30:15, 19; Sir 15:14–17 and 11:14 (ascribed to Solomon); Isa 1:19–20; Matt 6:10, 13; Matt 7:7.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 15:14-17 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Sir 11:14 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Heresy, Prayer

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 40 (CSEL 42:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-40). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-40) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 41

41CSEL 42:43–44

Videte tamen, obsecro, quale sit ideo uolenti et currenti misericordiam dei non necessariam, quae illum etiam praeuenit, ut curreret. quia de quodam ait apostolus: quod uult faciat, ibi, ut arbitror, ubi sequitur et dicit: non peccat, nubat — quasi pro magno habendum sit uelle nubere, ubi de adiutorio diuinae misericordiae operosius disputatur, aut uero etiam ibi prodest aliquid uelle, nisi deus prouidentia, qua gubernat omnia, marem feminamque coniungat — aut quoniam ad Philemonem scripsit apostolus: ut non quasi ex necessitate bonum eius esset, sed uoluntarium, quasi aliter sit uoluntarium bonum, nisi cum deus operatur in nobis et uelle et operari pro bona uoluntate; aut quia in Deuteronomio scriptum est: uitam et mortem dedit ante faciem hominis, bonum et malum et ammonuit ut eligeret uitam, quasi et ipsa ammonitio non de misericordia ueniat, uel aliquid prodesset eligere uitam, nisi deus eligendi caritatem inspiraret et electam habere praestaret, de quo dictum est: quoniam ira in indignatione eius et uita in uoluntate eius; aut quia dictum est: si uoles praecepta, seruabit te, quasi non debeat deo agere gratias, quia praecepta uoluit, qui desertus omni lumine ueritatis haec uelle non posset. positis ante hominem igne et aqua, quo uult quidem porrigit manum, sed altior est qui uocat altius quam omnis humana cogitatio, quandoquidem initium corrigendi cor fides est, sicut scriptum est: uenies et pertransies ab initio fidei, et quisque ita eligit bonum, sicut unicuique deus partitus est mensuram fidei, et: nemo potest ad me uenire, ait princeps fidei, nisi pater qui misit me traxerit eum. quod de fide dictum esse qua in eum creditur postea satis euidenter explanat, ubi dicit: uerba, quae ego locutus sum uobis, spiritus et uita sunt. sed sunt quidam ex uobis qui non credunt. sciebat enim ab initio Iesus, qui essent credentes et quis traditurus esset eum. et dicebat: propterea dixi uobis, quia nemo potest uenire ad me, nisi fuerit ei datum a patre meo.

Yet see, I beg you, what sort of argument it is that God's mercy, which even went before him so that he might run, is therefore not necessary to one who wills and runs: because the apostle says of a certain man, “Let him do what he wills,” in the place, I think, where he continues and says, “He does not sin; let him marry”; as though willing to marry were to be counted something great where the help of divine mercy is being argued about so laboriously; or as though even there willing did any good unless God, by the providence by which he governs all things, joined man and woman. Or because the apostle wrote to Philemon, “so that his good deed might not be as if from necessity but voluntary”; as though a good deed were voluntary in any other way than when God works in us both to will and to work for his good will. Or because it is written in Deuteronomy, “He has set life and death before man's face, good and evil,” and he urged him to choose life; as though this very admonition did not come from mercy, or as though choosing life did any good unless God breathed in the love of choosing it and granted that what was chosen be held, of whom it is said, “For wrath is in his indignation, and life in his will.” Or because it is said, “If you will keep the precepts, they will keep you”; as though he who willed the precepts ought not to give thanks to God, since, deserted by all light of truth, he could not will them. With fire and water set before man, he does stretch out his hand where he wills; but higher than all human thought is he who calls from on high, since the beginning of correcting the heart is faith, as it is written, “You will come and pass on from the beginning of faith”; and each chooses good according as God has assigned to each a measure of faith; and, “No one can come to me,” says the prince of faith, “unless the Father who sent me draws him.” That this was said of the faith by which one believes in him he explains clearly enough afterwards, where he says: “The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning who were believing and who would betray him. And he said: This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is given him by my Father.”

1 Cor 7:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Phlm 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 30:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 30:5 (29:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Song 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 12:3 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:63 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:64 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:65 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: None of Caelestius's texts on choice excludes grace: even marriage, voluntary goodness, choosing life, and willing the commandments depend on God, who gives faith.

  • 1 Cor 7:36; Phlm 14; Phil 2:13; Deut 30:15, 19; Ps 30:5 (29:6 LXX/Vulg.); Sir 15:15–16; Song 4:8 (Old Latin, following the Greek); Rom 12:3; John 6:44, 63–65.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 15:15-16 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)

Topics: Heresy, Marriage

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 41 (CSEL 42:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-41). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-41) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 42

42CSEL 42:44–45

Magnum autem aliquid pro sua causa se inuenisse arbitratus est apud Esaiam prophetam, quia deus dixit: si uolueritis et audieritis me, quae bona sunt terrae manducabitis; si autem nolueritis et non audieritis me, gladius uos comedet; os enim domini locutum est haec. quasi non lex tota huius modi condicionibus plena sit aut ob aliud superbis praecepta ista data sunt, nisi quia lex praeuaricationis gratia posita est, donec ueniret semen cui promissum est, unde subintrauit ut abundaret delictum; et ubi abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia: id est ut acciperet homo praecepta superbe de suis uiribus fidens, in quibus deficiens et factus etiam praeuaricator liberatorem saluatoremque requireret atque ita eum timor legis humilem factum tamquam paedagogus ad fidem gratiamque perduceret. ita multiplicatis infirmitatibus postea accelerauerunt, quibus sanandis oportune Christus aduenit. in cuius gratiam etiam iusti antiqui crediderunt eadem ipsa gratia eius adiuti, ut gaudentes eum praenoscerent et quidam etiam praenuntiarent esse uenturum, uel in illo populo Israel, sicut Moyses et Iesus Naue et Samuhel et Dauid et ceteri tales, uel extra ipsum populum, sicut Iob, uel ante ipsum populum, sicut Abraham, sicut Noe et quicumque alii sunt, quos uel commemorat uel tacet scriptura diuina. unus enim deus et unus mediator dei et hominum, homo Christus Iesus, sine cuius gratia nemo a condemnatione liberatur, siue quam traxit ex illo in quo omnes peccauerunt siue quam postea suis iniquitatibus addidit.

But he thought he had found something great for his case in the prophet Isaiah, where God said: “If you are willing and listen to me, you shall eat the good things of the land; but if you are unwilling and do not listen to me, the sword shall devour you; for the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things.” As though the whole law were not full of conditions of this kind; or as though these commandments were given to the proud for any other reason than that the law was placed because of transgression, until the offspring should come to whom the promise was made; whence the law came in so that trespass might abound; and where trespass abounded, grace superabounded. That is, so that man, proudly trusting in his own strength, might receive the commandments, and, failing in them and becoming even a transgressor, might seek a deliverer and savior; and so the fear of the law, having made him humble, might, like a tutor, lead him to faith and grace. So, “their infirmities were multiplied; afterwards they made haste,” and for healing them Christ came at the fitting time. In his grace even the righteous of old believed, helped by that same grace of his, so that they joyfully foreknew him, and some even foretold that he would come: whether within that people of Israel, like Moses, Joshua son of Nun, Samuel, David, and others like them; or outside that people, like Job; or before that people, like Abraham, like Noah, and any others whom the divine Scripture mentions or passes over. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, without whose grace no one is freed from condemnation, whether that which he contracted from him in whom all sinned, or that which he added afterwards by his own iniquities.

Isa 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 3:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 3:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX) (quotation, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The conditional promises of the law were given to humble the proud and lead them to grace; the righteous of old too were saved by Christ, the one mediator.

  • Isa 1:19–20; Gal 3:19; Rom 5:20; Gal 3:24; Ps 16:4 (15:4 LXX/Vulg., Old Latin form); 1 Tim 2:5; Rom 5:12.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray mark in the digital text): superabundauit. gratia → superabundauit gratia.

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 42 (CSEL 42:44–45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-42). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-42) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 43

43CSEL 42:45–46

Quale est autem, quod iste posuit in extremo, si quis dixerit: potest fieri ut homo uel in uerbo non peccet? respondendum est, inquit, si uult deus, potest; uult enim deus, ergo potest. item ait: si quis dixerit: fieri potest ut homo non in cogitatione delinquat? respondendum est: si uult deus, potest; uult enim deus, ergo potest. uidete quemadmodum noluerit dicere: si deus adiuuet, potest, cui dicitur: adiutor meus esto, ne derelinquas me, non utique ad corporalia bona capessenda et mala cauenda, sed ad gerendam perficiendamque iustitiam. propter quod dicimus: ne nos inferas in temptationem, sed libera nos a malo. nec adiuuatur, nisi qui et ipse aliquid agit; adiuuatur autem, si inuocat, si credit, si secundum propositum uocatus est, quoniam quos ante praesciuit, et praedestinauit conformes imaginis filii sui, ut sit ipse primogenitus in multis fratribus: quos autem praedestinauit, illos et uocauit; quos autem uocauit, illos et iustificauit; quos autem iustificauit, illos et glorificauit. currimus ergo, cum proficimus, dum sanitas nostra in proficientibus currit — sicut etiam cicatrix currere dicitur, quando bene uulnus diligenterque curatur omni ex parte perfecti sine ulla simus omnino infirmitate peccati, quod non solum uult deus, uerum etiam ut impleatur facit atque adiuuat. et hoc nobiscum agit gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum non solum praeceptis, sacramentis, exemplis, sed etiam spiritu sancto, per quem latenter diffunditur caritas in cordibus nostris, quae interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus, donec in nobis sanitas perficiatur et deus, sicuti est, uidendus in aeterna ueritate monstretur.

And what of what he put at the end: “If anyone says, ‘Can it be that a man does not sin even in word?’, the answer must be: If God wills, he can; and God wills, therefore he can.” He also says: “If anyone says, ‘Can it be that a man does not offend in thought?’, the answer must be: If God wills, he can; and God wills, therefore he can.” See how he would not say, “If God helps, he can,” to whom it is said, “Be my helper, do not forsake me,” certainly not for obtaining bodily goods and avoiding evils, but for doing and accomplishing righteousness. That is why we say, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” And no one is helped unless he himself also does something; but he is helped if he calls on God, if he believes, if he is called according to his purpose; for “those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, so that he might be the firstborn among many brothers; and those whom he predestined he also called; and those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified.” We run, then, when we make progress, while our health runs forward in those who make progress (as a scar too is said to run, when a wound is well and carefully treated), so that we may be perfect in every part, without any infirmity of sin at all; which God not only wills, but also brings about and helps to be fulfilled. And the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord does this with us, not only by commandments, sacraments, and examples, but also by the Holy Spirit, through whom love is secretly poured into our hearts, who intercedes with groanings too deep for words, until health is perfected in us and God is shown, to be seen as he is, in eternal truth.

Ps 27:9 (26:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 3:2 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Caelestius says man can avoid sin if God wills, avoiding “if God helps”; Augustine insists that the Spirit's help heals us progressively until we see God.

  • Ps 27:9 (26:9 LXX/Vulg.); Matt 6:13; Rom 8:28–30; Rom 5:5; Rom 8:26; 1 John 3:2. The parenthesis on the scar is unclosed in the digital text; translated by sense. The opening parenthesis before “si quis” is a quotation marker.

Topics: Heresy, Prayer

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 43 (CSEL 42:45–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-43). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-43) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).

Chapter 44

44CSEL 42:46–49

Quisquis ergo fuisse uel esse in hac uita aliquem hominem uel aliquos homines putat excepto uno mediatore dei et hominum, quibus necessaria non fuerit remissio peccatorum, contrarius est diuinae scripturae, ubi apostolus dicit: per unum hominem peccatum intrauit in mundum et per peccatum mors, et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccauerunt, et necesse est ut inpia contentione asserat esse posse homines, qui sine mediatore Christo liberante atque saluante sint liberi saluique peccato, cum ille dixerit: non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus, non ueni uocare iustos, sed peccatores. quisquis autem dicit post acceptam remissionem peccatorum ita quemquam hominem iuste uixisse in hac carne uel uiuere, ut nullum habeat omnino peccatum, contradicit apostolo Iohanni, qui ait: si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus et ueritas in nobis non est, non enim ait habuimus, sed habemus. quod si quisquam asserit de illo peccato dictum, quod habitat in carne mortali nostra secundum uitium quod peccantis primi hominis uoluntate contractum est, cuius peccati desideriis ne oboediamus Paulus apostolus praecipit, non autem peccare, qui eidem peccato quamuis in carne habitanti ad nullum opus malum omnino consentit, uel facti uel dicti uel cogitati, quamuis ipsa concupiscentia moueatur, quae alio modo peccati nomen accepit, quod ei consentire peccare sit nobisque moueatur inuitis: subtiliter quidem ista discernit, sed uideat quid agatur de dominica oratione, ubi dicimus: dimitte nobis debita nostra. quod, nisi fallor, non opus esset dicere, si numquam uel in lapsu linguae uel in oblectanda cogitatione eiusdem peccati desideriis aliquantum consentiremus, sed tantummodo dicendum esset: ne nos inferas in temptationem, sed libera nos a malo, nec Iacobus apostolus diceret: in multis offendimus omnes. non enim offendit, nisi cui mala concupiscentia contra iustitiae rationem appetendo seu uitando faciendum uel dicendum uel cogitandum aliquid, quod non debuit, siue fallens siue praeualens persuadet. postremo, si excepto illo capite nostro, sui corporis saluatore, asseruntur uel fuisse in hac uita uel esse aliqui homines iusti sine aliquo peccato, siue numquam consentiendo desideriis eius siue quia pro nullo peccato habendum est, quod tantum est, ut hoc pietati non imputet deus — quamuis aliter sit beatus sine peccato, aliter autem beatus cui non imputat dominus peccatum — non nimis existimo reluctandum. scio enim quibusdam esse uisum, quorum de hac re sententiam non audeo reprehendere, quamquam nec defendere ualeam. sed plane quisquis negat nos orare debere, ne intremus in temptationem — negat autem hoc qui contendit ad non peccandum gratiae dei adiutorium non esse homini necessarium, sed sola lege accepta humanam sufficere uoluntatem — ab auribus omnium remouendum et ore omnium anathemandum esse non dubito.

Whoever, then, thinks that there has been or is in this life any man or men, except the one mediator between God and men, for whom forgiveness of sins was not necessary, is contrary to the divine Scripture, where the apostle says: “Through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so it passed to all men, in whom all sinned”; and he must assert with ungodly contention that there can be men who are free and saved from sin without Christ the mediator freeing and saving them, though he said: “Those who are well do not need a physician, but those who are sick; I came not to call the righteous but sinners.” But whoever says that, after receiving forgiveness of sins, any man has lived or lives so righteously in this flesh that he has no sin at all contradicts the apostle John, who says: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” For he does not say “had” but “have.” If anyone asserts that this was said of that sin which dwells in our mortal flesh, according to the defect contracted by the will of the first man in sinning, whose desires the apostle Paul commands us not to obey; and that he does not sin who does not consent at all to that same sin, though it dwells in the flesh, for any evil work, whether of deed, word, or thought, although desire itself is stirred (which in another sense has received the name of sin, because to consent to it is to sin, and it is stirred in us against our will): he distinguishes these things subtly, but let him see what becomes of the Lord's Prayer, where we say, “Forgive us our debts.” This, unless I am mistaken, would not need to be said if we never consented even a little to the desires of that same sin, whether in a slip of the tongue or in taking pleasure in a thought; but we would only need to say, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” Nor would the apostle James say: “We all offend in many things.” For no one offends except one whom evil desire, against the rule of righteousness, persuades, whether by deceiving or by overpowering, to do or say or think something he ought not, in seeking or in avoiding. Finally, if it is asserted that, except for that head of ours, the savior of his body, there have been or are in this life some righteous men without any sin, either because they never consent to its desires or because what is so small that God does not impute it to godliness is not to be counted as any sin (although it is one thing to be blessed as being without sin, and another to be blessed as one to whom the Lord does not impute sin), I do not think it should be resisted too strongly. For I know that some have held this view, whose opinion on this matter I do not dare to reprove, though I cannot defend it either. But plainly, whoever denies that we ought to pray that we may not enter into temptation (and he denies this who contends that the help of God's grace is not necessary for man not to sin, but that human will suffices once the law has been received), I do not doubt should be removed from the ears of all and anathematized by the mouth of all.

1 Tim 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 9:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 9:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 5:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 32:2 (31:2 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:41 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine concludes: no one but Christ has lived without needing forgiveness; he will not fight those who think some saints never consented to sin, but whoever denies the need to pray for grace against temptation is to be anathematized.

  • 1 Tim 2:5; Rom 5:12 (Old Latin “in quo,” “in whom”); Matt 9:12–13; 1 John 1:8; Rom 6:12; Matt 6:12–13; Jas 3:2; Eph 5:23; Ps 32:1–2 (31:1–2 LXX/Vulg.); Matt 26:41. The digital text of the quotation of 1 John 1:8 is badly broken and is corrected by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (letters scattered and repeated in the digital text; stray letters in the digital text): quia p peccatum a turn non hab em u s, nos i psos s seducimus et us et u ueritas → quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus et ueritas; desideriis eri i s ne → desideriis ne.

Topics: Heresy, Prayer

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Perf. iust. 44 (CSEL 42:46–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-perfectione-iustitiae/38/#p-44). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-perfectione-iustitiae-44) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Urba and Zycha (CSEL 42, 1902); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 5 (1887).