Sermons to the People 10.1–11.3

Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).

Show

Chapter 10

10.1PL 38:91

Inter duas mulieres certantes de parvulo filio mirabile judicium Salomonis prædicat Scriptura Regnorum. Scriptum est enim: Tunc apparuerunt duæ mulieres meretrices regi Salomoni, et steterunt in conspectu ejus, et dixit mulier una: Animadverte, domine, ego et mulier hæc habitabamus in domo una, et peperi in domo, et contigit die tertio postquam peperi, peperit etiam hæc mulier filium; et eramus in uno, et non erat quisquam nobiscum præter ambas nos in domo: et mortuus est filius mulieris hujus per noctem, quia dormivit super eum; et surrexit media nocte, et tulit filium meum ab ascellis meis, et collocavit in sinu suo, et filium suum mortuum in sinu meo, et surrexi mane dare lac filio meo, et ille erat mortuus: consideravi eum mane, et ecce non erat filius meus quem peperi. Et dixit mulier illa alia: Non, sed filius meus est qui vivit, filius autem tuus qui mortuus est. Et ipsa dixit: Non, filius tuus est ille mortuus, et meus filius est qui vivit. Et locutæ sunt in conspectu Regis. Et dixit eis Rex: Tu dicis, Hic est filius meus qui vivit, et filius ejus mortuus est; et tu dicis, Non, sed filius meus vivit, et filius ejus mortuus est. Et ait Rex; Afferte mihi machæram. Et obtulerunt ei machæram in conspectu Regis. Et dixit Rex: Dividite puerum qui vivit, in duas partes, et date dimidium ejus huic, et dimidium ejus huic. Et respondit mulier cujus erat filius qui vivebat, et dixit ad Regem, quoniam conturbata est vulva ejus super filio suo; et dixit: Animadverte, domine, date ei puerum, et nolite eum morte afficere. Et hæc dixit: Neque mihi, neque huic sit, sed dividite illum. Et respondit Rex, et dixit ei mulieri quæ dixit, Date eum illi, et morte nolite eum afficere; Quia hæc est mater ejus. Prudentia quidem Regis divino munere concessa in hoc judicio mirabilis eminet. Non enim decuit, aut oportuit aliam judicare esse matrem pueri, nisi eam quae illum iterum quodam modo concepit, cum cognovit ablatum; et iterum parturivit, dum a falsa matre defendit; et iterum peperit, dum non permisit occidi. Verumtamen sicut solent divini veteres Libri, non solum rei gestæ fidem, sed etiam futuræ insinuare mysterium; consideranda est ista Scriptura, utrum nobis in duabus istis mulieribus significatum aliquid figuratumque demonstret.

The Scripture of the Kingdoms proclaims Solomon's wonderful judgment between two women contending over a little son. For it is written: "Then two women who were harlots came to King Solomon and stood before him, and one woman said: Hear, my lord: this woman and I lived in one house, and I gave birth in the house; and it happened on the third day after I gave birth that this woman also bore a son; and we were together, and there was no one with us except the two of us in the house: and this woman's son died in the night, because she lay on him; and she got up in the middle of the night and took my son from my arms and laid him in her bosom, and laid her dead son in my bosom; and I got up in the morning to give my son milk, and he was dead: I looked at him in the morning, and behold, it was not my son whom I had borne. And the other woman said: No, the living one is my son, and the dead one is your son. And she said: No, the dead one is your son, and the living one is my son. And they spoke before the king. And the king said to them: You say, This is my son who lives, and her son is dead; and you say, No, but my son lives, and her son is dead. And the king said, Bring me a sword. And they brought a sword before the king. And the king said: Divide the living child in two, and give half of him to this one, and half of him to that one. And the woman whose son was the living one answered and said to the king, for her womb was troubled over her son, and she said: Hear, my lord, give her the child, and do not put him to death. And the other said: Let him be neither mine nor hers, but divide him. And the king answered and said to the woman who said, Give him to her, and do not put him to death: Because this is his mother." The king's wisdom, granted by God's gift, stands out wonderfully in this judgment. For it was not fitting nor right to judge any other woman to be the child's mother than the one who in a way conceived him again when she learned he had been taken away, and gave birth again while she defended him from the false mother, and bore him again when she did not allow him to be killed. Yet as the ancient divine books are accustomed to convey not only the truth of what happened but also a mystery of what was to come, this Scripture must be considered, whether in these two women it shows us something signified and figured.

1 Kgs 3:16–27 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine reads the story of Solomon's judgment between the two harlots and asks what the two women signify.

  • 1 Kgs 3:16-27 (Latin 3 Kings). "The Scripture of the Kingdoms": the books of Kingdoms (1-4 Kgdms, i.e. 1 Sam-2 Kgs).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): duce mulieres meretrices → duæ mulieres meretrices; hac mulier → hæc mulier; non crat quisquam nobiscum præter ambas noa → non erat quisquam nobiscum præter ambas nos; mortuus eat filius → mortuus est filius; mox dormivit → quia dormivit; filius metis → filius meus; filius meus eat qui vivit filius → filius meus est qui vivit, filius; meus filius eat qui → meus filius est qui; locutce → locutæ; dixit cis Rex → dixit eis Rex; vivit, ct filius ejus mortuus est; et tu → vivit, et filius ejus mortuus est; et tu; vivit, ct filius ejus mortuus est. Et ait → vivit, et filius ejus mortuus est. Et ait; vivcbat → vivebat; conturbata eat vulva → conturbata est vulva; Animadrertite → Animadverte; mulieri quoe dixit → mulieri quæ dixit; hoec est → hæc est; ablattim → ablatum; veteres. Libri I, → veteres Libri,; fuluræ → futuræ; significalum → significatum.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.1 (PL 38:91; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.2PL 38:91–93

Et duæ quidem feminae Synagoga et Ecclesia in prima facie considerationis occurrunt: Synagoga enim filium suum Christum ex Judæis secundum carnem natum occidisse convincitur dormiens, id est præsentis vitæ sequendo lucem, manifestationemque veritatis in verbis Domini non intelligens: verum etiam scriptum est, Surge, qui dormis, et exsurge a mortuis, et illuminabit te Christus. Quod vero et duae et solæ in una domo inhabitabant, non absurde illud significat, quod præter circumcisionem et præputium, nullum in hoc mundo religionis genus inventum est: ut in persona unius mulieris unum genus circumcisorum hominum constituas sub unius Dei et cultu et lege comprehensum; in alterius vero mulieris persona universam præputiorum Gentilitatem idolorum cultui deditam intelligas. Meretrices autem ambæ fuerunt: dicit enim Apostolus Judæos et Graecos omnes sub peccato esse. Omnis enim anima quæ deserta æternitate veritatis, terrenis sordibus delectatur, fornicatur a Domino. Et de gentili quidem fornicatione veniens Ecclesia manifestum est quod non occiderit Christum: sed quomodo mater Christi etiam ipsa sit, cogitandum est. Attende Evangelium, et audi Dominum dicentem, Qui fecerit voluntatem Patris mei, hic mater mea, et frater, et soror est. Ubi ergo dormivit hæc, non ut somno præfocaret, sed tamen ut posset ei mortuus supponi, et vivus auferri? An forte hoc est, quod ipsum sacramentum circumcisionis, quod apud Judæos jam mortuum remanserat, quia totum de illo carnaliter sentiebant: hoc ergo sacramentum circumcisionis, quod apud Judæos non vivebat, qui occiderant Christum, qui omnium sacramentorum vita est; quoniam in illo vitaliter intelligitur, quod apud Judaeos visibiliter celebratur: hoc itaque sacramentum circumcisionis tanquam exanime corpus quidam Judæi volebant persuadere Gentilibus, qui Christo crediderant, sicut in Actibus Apostolorum scriptum est, dicentes non posse eos esse salvos, nisi fierent circumcisi? Persuadebant autem hoc ignorantibus Legem, tanquam in tenebris noctis filium mortuum supponentes. Nec tamen potuit aliquid valere illa persuasio, nisi cum Ecclesiæ Gentium ex aliqua parte stultitiæ somnus obrepsit. Quam videtur quasi dormientem Apostolus excitare, clamans, O stulti Galatæ, quis vos fascinavit? et paulo post, Sic stulti estis, inquit, ut cum spiritu coeperitis, nunc carne consummemini. Tanquam si diceret: Sic stulti estis, ut cum prius habueritis spirituale opus vivum, hoc amisso postea mortuum accipiatis alienum. Ipse quippe Apostolus alibi dicit, Spiritus vita est propter justitiam; et alibi, Sapere autem secundum carnem, mors est. His autem atque hujusmodi vocibus illa mater evigilat; et fit ei mane, cum verbo Dei, hoc est, cum Christo, qui oriebatur, hoc est, loquebatur in Paulo, Legis illuminatur obscuritas. Hanc enim illuminavit, cum ait, Dicite mihi sub Lege volentes esse, Legem non audistis? Scriptum est enim quia Abraham duos filios habuit; unum de ancilla, et unum de libera: sed is qui de ancilla, secundum carnem natus est; qui autem de libera, per repromissionem; quæ sunt in allegoria. Hæc enim sunt duo Testamenta; unum quidem a monte Sina, in servitutem generans, quod est Agar. Sina enim mons est in Arabia, quæ conjuncta est huic, quæ nunc est Jerusalem: servit enim cum filiis suis. Quae autem sursum est Jerusalem, libera est. Non ergo mirum, si propter mortua opera, ad eam quæ deorsum est, mortuus; et propter spiritualia, vivus pertinet ad eam quæ sursum est Jerusalem. Quia et inferi deorsum sunt, quo pertinent mortui: superi autem sursum, quo pertinent vivi. Hac illuminatione, tanquam mane facto, intelligit Ecclesia gratiam spiritualem; repellens a se carnale opus Legis, tanquam mortuum alienum; et sibi vindicans vivam fidem, quoniam justus ex fide vivit: quam in Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti nomine consecuta est; et ideo tanquam triduanum filium certa cognoscit, nec eum sibi eripi patitur.

And the two women first present themselves, at first glance, as the Synagogue and the Church. For the Synagogue is shown to have killed, while sleeping, its son Christ, born of the Jews according to the flesh; that is, following the light of the present life, and not understanding the manifestation of the truth in the Lord's words: indeed it is also written, "Arise, you who sleep, and rise from the dead, and Christ will give you light." That the two lived alone in one house signifies, not absurdly, that apart from circumcision and uncircumcision no kind of religion has been found in this world: so that in the person of one woman you may set the one race of the circumcised, comprised under the worship and law of the one God; and in the person of the other woman you may understand the whole Gentile world of the uncircumcised, given over to the worship of idols. Both were harlots: for the Apostle says that Jews and Greeks are all under sin. For every soul that has deserted the eternity of truth and delights in earthly filth commits fornication away from the Lord. And that the Church, coming from the fornication of the Gentiles, did not kill Christ is plain; but how she too is Christ's mother must be considered. Attend to the Gospel, and hear the Lord saying, "Whoever does the will of my Father, he is my mother and brother and sister." Where, then, did this woman sleep, not so as to smother the child in her sleep, but so that the dead one could be put in her bosom and the living one taken away? Perhaps it is this: that the very sacrament of circumcision, which had remained dead among the Jews, because they understood it wholly carnally (this sacrament of circumcision, then, which did not live among the Jews, who had killed Christ, who is the life of all sacraments, since in him is understood in a living way what is celebrated visibly among the Jews), this sacrament of circumcision, then, like a lifeless body, certain Jews wanted to press upon the Gentiles who had believed in Christ, as is written in the Acts of the Apostles, saying that they could not be saved unless they were circumcised? And they pressed this on people ignorant of the Law, as if putting the dead son in her place in the darkness of night. Yet that persuasion could have no force except when the sleep of folly crept over the Church of the Gentiles in some part. The Apostle seems to wake her, as if sleeping, crying out, "O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you?" and a little later, "Are you so foolish," he says, "that having begun in the Spirit, you are now being completed in the flesh?" As if he said: Are you so foolish that, though you first had a living spiritual work, having lost it you now accept a dead one that is not yours? For the Apostle himself says elsewhere, "The Spirit is life because of righteousness"; and elsewhere, "To be carnally minded is death." At these and similar cries that mother wakes up; and it becomes morning for her when, through the word of God, that is, through Christ, who was rising, that is, speaking in Paul, the darkness of the Law is lit up. For he lit it up when he said, "Tell me, you who want to be under the Law, have you not heard the Law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman; but the son of the slave woman was born according to the flesh, the son of the free woman through promise; which things are an allegory. For these are the two covenants: one from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery, which is Hagar. For Sinai is a mountain in Arabia, which corresponds to the present Jerusalem: for she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free." It is no wonder, then, if on account of dead works the dead child belongs to the one who is below, and on account of spiritual works the living child belongs to the Jerusalem which is above. For the underworld is below, to which the dead belong; the realms above are above, to which the living belong. By this illumination, as when morning has come, the Church understands spiritual grace, rejecting from herself the carnal work of the Law as a dead child not her own, and claiming for herself living faith, since "the righteous lives by faith": which she obtained in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit; and so she recognizes with certainty her three-day-old son and does not let him be snatched from her.

Eph 5:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 12:50 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 15:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 4:21–26 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Hab 2:4 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 28:19 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Kgs 3:16–27 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The two harlots are the Synagogue and the Church: the Synagogue killed Christ, and Judaizers tried to substitute the dead rite of circumcision for the Gentile Church's living faith, until Paul woke her up.

  • The opening words of the digital text, "Mulieres duæ coram Salomone litigantes de filio, Synagoga et Ecclesia. Sacramentorum vita, Christus," are Migne's marginal heading and are removed. Augustine's figure of the Synagogue as having killed Christ is translated as written. Quotations: Eph 5:14; Rom 3:9; Matt 12:50; Acts 15:1; Gal 3:1, 3; Rom 8:10; Rom 8:6; Gal 4:21-26; Rom 1:17 (Hab 2:4); Matt 28:19. The "three days" of the child (1 Kgs 3:18) are read as faith in the Trinity.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left at the start of the text; removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in the digital text): Mulieres duce coram Salomone litigantes de filio, Synagoga et Ecclesia. Sacramentorum vita, Christus. Et dux quidem → Et duæ quidem; presentis vitæ sequcndo lucem, manifestationemque i eritatis → præsentis vitæ sequendo lucem, manifestationemque veritatis; veruin etiam → verum etiam; pra'ter circumcisionem → præter circumcisionem; rcligionis gcm I inventum → religionis genus inventum; Judæos ct Graecos → Judæos et Graecos; mani. festum → manifestum; cogitandum cst → cogitandum est; remanscrat → remanserat; persuadcre → persuadere; nisi Cierent → nisi fierent; boc ignorantibus → hoc ignorantibus; 0 stulti → O stulti; stultii estis → stulti estis; metem secundum → autem secundum; qni oriebatur → qui oriebatur; Ilanc enim illuminavit, cum nit → Hanc enim illuminavit, cum ait; liabuit → habuit; quod eat Agar. Sina enim mons eat in Arabia, quas conjuncta eat huic, quæ nunc eat Jerusalem → quod est Agar. Sina enim mons est in Arabia, quæ conjuncta est huic, quæ nunc est Jerusalem; Jerusalem, libera eat → Jerusalem, libera est; quæ deorum est → quæ deorsum est; ad cam quæ → ad eam quæ; a sc carnale → a se carnale; tilium → filium.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.2 (PL 38:91–93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.3PL 38:93

Nunc clamet illa suum esse Evangelium, tanquam sibi debitum, et per se generatum. Nam hoc dicebant Gentibus in ipsa contentione, qui ex Judæis carnaliter sentientes Christianos se dicere audebant. Tanquam debitum enim justitiæ suae dicebant venisse Evangelium. Sed non erat eorum, quod spiritualiter non noverant. Quod ergo Christiani vocabantur, alieno nomine gloriantes, tanquam illa de filio quem non ipsa pepererat, etiam contendere audebant; cum ipsi ex operibus Legis excluso intellectu spirituali tanquam de corpore operis sui animam ejecerant, et exstinguentes prophetiæ spiritum vivum, ad carnalia opera sine vita, hoc est, sine intellectu spirituali remanserant; quae Gentibus etiam supponere cupiebant, et ab eis tanquam vivum filium, nomen auferre Christianum. Quos ita refellit Apostolus, ut tanto minus ad eos pertinere dicat gratiam christianam, quanto magis eam sibi tanquam debitam vindicant, et quasi jure operum suam esse gloriantur. Ei enim qui operatur, inquit, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum. Ei vero qui non operatur, credenti autem in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ad justitiam. Et ideo illos etiam ab eorum numero excludit, qui ex Judæis recte crediderant, et vivam spiritualemque gratiam retinebant. Quas reliquias dicit populi Judæorum salvas factas, cum multitudo isset in perditionem? Sic ergo et in hoc tempore, inquit, reliquiæ per electionem gratiæ salvæ factæ sunt. Si autem gratia, jam non ex operibus: alioquin gratia jam non est gratia. Ut illi excludantur a gratia, qui tanquam suum proprium, id est, operibus suis debitum et datum Evangelii præmium vindicant: quasi clamante Synagoga, Meus est Filius. Sed mentiebatur; acceperat enim eum et ipsa: sed super eum dormiens, id est, superbe sapiens necaverat. Vigilabat autem jam ista mater, et intelligebat, non meritis suis, quia meretrix erat, sed gratia Dei sibi filium esse concessum, opus videlicet evangelicæ fidei, quod in sinu cordis nutrire cupiebat. Itaque illa gloriam hominum quaerebat in alieno filio: hæc affectum dilectionis servabat in suo.

Now let that other woman cry out that the Gospel is hers, as owed to her and born of her. For this is what was said to the Gentiles in that very dispute by those from among the Jews who, thinking carnally, dared to call themselves Christians. For they said that the Gospel had come as something owed to their righteousness. But what they did not know spiritually was not theirs. So, in that they were called Christians, boasting in a name not their own, they even dared, like that woman over the son she had not borne, to contend; whereas they themselves, having shut out spiritual understanding from the works of the Law, had as it were cast the soul out of the body of their own work, and, extinguishing the living spirit of prophecy, had remained with carnal works without life, that is, without spiritual understanding; and these works they wanted to substitute among the Gentiles too, and to take from them the Christian name as a living son. The Apostle refutes them by saying that Christian grace belongs to them the less, the more they claim it for themselves as owed, and boast that it is theirs as of right by works. "For to him who works," he says, "the reward is not reckoned as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work, but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness." And so he excludes them even from the number of those from among the Jews who had rightly believed and held on to living and spiritual grace. These he calls the remnant of the Jewish people that has been saved, while the multitude went to perdition. "So too at this present time," he says, "a remnant has been saved by the election of grace. But if by grace, then no longer by works: otherwise grace is no longer grace." So that those are excluded from grace who claim the reward of the Gospel as their own, that is, as owed and given to their works; as if the Synagogue were crying out, "The son is mine." But she was lying; for she too had received him; but sleeping on him, that is, being proud-minded, she had killed him. But this mother was now awake, and understood that it was not by her merits, since she was a harlot, but by the grace of God that a son had been granted her, namely the work of evangelical faith, which she wished to nourish in the bosom of her heart. And so the one sought human glory in another's son; the other kept the affection of love for her own.

Rom 4:4–5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:5–6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:27 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Judaizing Christians claimed the Gospel as owed to their works, like the false mother claiming the child; but grace is given not to merits, as Paul says, and the Church holds it as a gift.

  • Rom 4:4-5; Rom 11:5-6; Rom 9:27. Augustine's characterization of the Synagogue is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): qui cx Judæis → qui ex Judæis; audeLant → audebant; justitine suae → justitiæ suae; DOn noverant I. → non noverant.; qucm non → quem non; audebant1; → audebant;; ab cis tanquam → ab eis tanquam; dicatgratiam → dicat gratiam; gra. tiam, sed secundum debitune → gratiam, sed secundum debitum; eliam ab eorum → etiam ab eorum; Quas rcliquias → Quas reliquias; gratia jam non eat gratia → gratia jam non est gratia; pramium → præmium; Meus eat Filius. Sed menticbalur → Meus est Filius. Sed mentiebatur; autcm jam → autem jam; meretrix crat, sed gratia Dei sibi lilium → meretrix erat, sed gratia Dei sibi filium; fidei. quod → fidei, quod.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.3 (PL 38:93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.4PL 38:93

Illud autem inter ambas regale judicium nihil aliud nos admonet, nisi ut pro veritate certemus, et expellamus hypocrisim tanquam falsam matrem, a spirituali Ecclesiae dono tanquam ab alieno vivo filio; nec patiamur eam dominari concessæ aliis gratiæ, quae suam custodire non potuit. Sed hoc faciamus defendentes atque certantes non usque ad periculum divisionis. Illa enim sententia judicis, cum jussit parvulum dividi, non est unitatis praecisio, sed probatio charitatis. Salomonis enim nomen, sicut Latini interpretantur, Pacificum est. Rex vero pacificus non dilacerat membra, quae unitate atque concordia vitalem spiritum continent: sed minando invenit matrem veram, et judicando separat falsam. Si ergo ad hujusmodi tentationem ventum fuerit, ne unitas christianæ gratiae dividatur, docemur dicere, Date illi puerum, tantum vivat. Non enim honorem matris, sed salutem filii, quæ mater vera est quaerit. Ubicumque ille fuerit, plus eum possidebit sincera dilectio matris, quam falsae usurpatio.

And that royal judgment between the two warns us of nothing else than that we should contend for the truth, and drive out hypocrisy, like the false mother, from the spiritual gift of the Church, as from a living son not hers; and not allow her who could not keep her own to lord it over the grace granted to others. But let us do this, defending and contending, not to the point of the danger of division. For that sentence of the judge, when he ordered the little one to be divided, is not the cutting off of unity but the proving of love. For the name Solomon, as the Latins interpret it, means "Peaceful." And a peaceful king does not tear apart members which, by unity and concord, hold the spirit of life: but by threatening he finds the true mother, and by judging he separates the false one. If, then, it comes to a trial of this kind, we are taught to say, so that the unity of Christian grace may not be divided, "Give her the child; only let him live." For she who is the true mother seeks not a mother's honor but her son's safety. Wherever he is, the sincere love of the mother will possess him more than the usurpation of the false one.

1 Kgs 3:26 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Chr 22:9 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Solomon's threat to divide the child teaches that we must contend for the truth against hypocrisy, but never to the point of dividing the Church's unity.

  • 1 Kgs 3:26; 1 Chr 22:9 (Solomon, "peaceful"). The application to schism is aimed at the Donatist conflict.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): filio;nec patiamuream dominari concesse → filio; nec patiamur eam dominari concessæ; Rex vero pacificus nun → Rex vero pacificus non; cbrislianæ → christianæ; scd salutem fillii,quæ → sed salutem filii, quæ.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.4 (PL 38:93; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.5PL 38:93–95

Item video significare istas duas mulieres in una domo, duo genera hominum in una Ecclesia: unum eorum in quibus vera charitas regnat, alterum eorum in quibus simulatio dominatur. Ut ista duo omnino tanquam duas mulieres intueamur, dilectionem et simulationem. Dilectionem quippe simulatio fallaciter imitatur. Et ideo istam cavet Apostolus, cum dicit: Dilectio sine simulatione. Quamvis enim habitent in una domo quamdiu reticulum illud evangelicum in mari est, simulque bonos et malos pisces, donec ad littus perducatur, includit; tamen sua opera singulæ faciunt. Meretrices autem fuerunt ambæ; quia omnes ex cupiditate sæculi convertuntur ad gratiam Dei, nec de prioribus justitiæ meritis vere potest quisquam gloriari. Meretrix autem quod fornicatur, ipsius est: quod habet filium, Dei est. Omnes enim homines ab uno Deo creatore formantur. Nec mirandum est, quod etiam in peccatis hominum Deus bene operatur. Nam etiam de scelere Judæ traditoris Dominus noster salutem humani generis operatus est. Sed hoc interest, quod de cujusque peccato cum aliquid boni Deus fecerit, plerumque id nollet ille peccator: non solum quia cum peccat, non eo peccat animo, qua providentia Deus de peccato ejus operatur justitiam ( non enim hoc animo Judas tradidit Christum, quo animo Christus se tradi passus est); sed etiam quia peccati sui eventum, cum in aliquid melius, quod ipse nollet, pervenire cognoverit, dolet potius quam lætatur. Tanquam si venenum aliquis inimico ægrotanti dare cupiens fallatur in specie medicamenti, et aliud pro alio salutare aliquid offerat; fiat et æger sanus Dei beneficio, qui facinus inimici ejus convertere voluit in salutem: quod tamen cum malus ille cognoverit, de sanitate hominis, quae per manus ejus gesta est, cruciatur. Si autem meretrix conceptum filium libenter habeat, nec libidine, nec avaritia turpis mercedis impulsa abortionis poculo de visceribus ejiciat quod conceperat, ne peccanti fecunditas contradicat; cupiditas illa, quae defluebat in plurimos, ad unum Dei donum conversa, non jam cupiditas, sed dilectio nominabitur. Meretricis ergo filius recte intelligitur gratia peccatricis. Ex vetere autem turpitudine novus homo natus indulgentia peccatorum est.

Again, I see that these two women in one house signify two kinds of people in one Church: one of those in whom true love reigns, the other of those in whom pretence rules. So that we may regard these two altogether as two women: love and pretence. For pretence deceitfully imitates love. And that is why the Apostle guards against it when he says, "Love without pretence." For although they live in one house as long as that net of the Gospel is in the sea and encloses good and bad fish together until it is drawn to the shore, yet each does her own works. And both were harlots, because all are converted to the grace of God from worldly desire, and no one can truly boast of previous merits of righteousness. And that a harlot commits fornication is her own doing; that she has a son is God's. For all human beings are formed by the one God the Creator. Nor is it to be wondered at that God works well even in people's sins. For even from the crime of Judas the betrayer our Lord worked the salvation of the human race. But there is this difference: that when God has made something good out of someone's sin, the sinner generally did not want it: not only because, when he sins, he does not sin with the intention with which God by his providence works righteousness from his sin (for Judas did not betray Christ with the intention with which Christ allowed himself to be betrayed), but also because, when he learns that the outcome of his sin has turned to something better, which he did not want, he grieves rather than rejoices. As if someone wanting to give poison to a sick enemy were deceived by the look of a medicine and offered something healthful instead; and the sick man is made well by the kindness of God, who willed to turn his enemy's crime into healing: and yet when that wicked man learns of it, he is tormented by the man's recovery, which was brought about by his own hands. But if a harlot willingly keeps the son she has conceived, and is not driven by lust or by greed for a shameful wage to cast out of her womb by a drink for abortion what she had conceived, lest fruitfulness stand in the way of her sinning; then that desire which flowed out to many, turned to the one gift of God, will no longer be called desire but love. The harlot's son, then, is rightly understood as the grace given to a sinful woman. And from the old shame the new man has been born by the forgiveness of sins.

Rom 12:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:47–48 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:14–16 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The two women also signify love and pretence within the one Church; both were harlots, since all come to grace from sin, but the child is God's gift, as God brings good out of human sin.

  • Rom 12:9; Matt 13:47-48; Matt 26:14-16 (Judas). The reference to abortion is Augustine's illustration and is translated exactly.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): mulieres In una → mulieres in una; in qui bus vcca charitas regnat, alterum corum → in quibus vera charitas regnat, alterum eorum; Ut isia → Ut ista; oper.a → opera; nee de prioribus → nec de prioribus; tilium, Pei est → filium, Dei est; bominum Deus → hominum Deus; Judic traditori → Judæ traditoris; Sed hQc interest, → Sed hoc interest,; Deusde → Deus de; Cbristum → Christum; passus esl → passus est; vcnenum aliquis inimico Tgrotanti → venenum aliquis inimico ægrotanti; æger,anus → æger sanus; facinys inimici ejqs → facinus inimici ejus; bominis → hominis; donum I conversa → donum conversa; est2. → est..

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.5 (PL 38:93–95; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.6PL 38:95

Dominus ergo et in ipso numero discipulorum, quamvis ex peccatoribus omnes elegerit, priores tamen elegit perseveraturos in dilectione, quam Judam simulatorem. Non est quidem scriptum quo ordine electus sit; sed tamen notum est ante illum electos bonos; et non frustra ultimus numeratur. Et post Domini ascensionem omnibus qui erant uno in loco Spiritus sanctus, secundum pollicitationem Domini desuper missus, infusus est: a quibus coepit Ecclesia, boni erant, et sine simulatione diligebant. Postea ergo simulatio cœpit operari in Ecclesia: et ideo dilectio prior peperit. Triduo autem major est fructus dilectionis, ut jam possit agnosci continentia, et justitia, et exspectatio futurorum. Simulatio vero etsi pepererit, id est, etiamsi ad exiguum tempus peccatorum remissione lætata fuerit, tanquam somno sæcularis cupiditatis oppressa, cum de spe coelestium dejecta præmiorum in terrenam requiem gravato corde reliditur, quasi dormiens effocat indulgentiam, quam credendo meruerat. Tales autem homines malunt justitiæ nomine, quam veritate gaudere; bonumque opus alienum per obscuras fallacias, quasi per noctem vivum filium, mentiendo ad se transferre conantur. Nec solum aliorum bona opera sibi usurpant, sed aliis etiam objiciunt scelera sua, quasi mortuum filium supponentes.

So the Lord, in the very number of his disciples, though he chose them all from sinners, still chose first those who would persevere in love, rather than Judas the pretender. It is not written in what order he was chosen; but it is known that good men were chosen before him; and not without reason is he numbered last. And after the Lord's ascension the Holy Spirit, sent from above according to the Lord's promise, was poured out on all who were together in one place: those from whom the Church began were good and loved without pretence. Afterwards, then, pretence began to work in the Church: and that is why love gave birth first. And the fruit of love is three days older, so that self-control, and righteousness, and the expectation of things to come can now be recognized. But pretence, even if it has given birth, that is, even if it has rejoiced for a short time in the forgiveness of sins, as if overcome by the sleep of worldly desire, when, cast down from the hope of heavenly rewards, it sinks with a heavy heart into earthly rest, as if sleeping it smothers the forgiveness which it had earned by believing. Such people prefer to rejoice in the name of righteousness rather than in its truth; and by obscure deceptions, as if by night, they try by lying to transfer to themselves another's good work, like a living son. And not only do they usurp the good works of others, but they also charge others with their own crimes, as if putting the dead son in their place.

Matt 10:2–4 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 2:1–4 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 3:18–20 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Love gave birth first in the Church, as the good apostles were chosen before Judas; pretence, smothering the grace it received, claims others' good works and imputes its own sins to them.

  • The opening words of the digital text, "Simulatores in Ecclesia bonis operariis posteriores," are Migne's marginal heading and are removed. Matt 10:2-4; Acts 1:13-14; Acts 2:1-4; 1 Kgs 3:18-20.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left at the start of the text; removed; OCR slip in the digital text): Simulatore. in Ecclesia bonis operariis posterior res. Dominus → Dominus; tamcn notum → tamen notum; operari ill Ecclesia → operari in Ecclesia; major eat fructus → major est fructus; Vero etsi pepercrit → vero etsi pepererit; exignum → exiguum; præmioum → præmiorum; credento meruerat 1. Tales autem homine? malunt justitiæ noinine, qnam vcritato → credendo meruerat. Tales autem homines malunt justitiæ nomine, quam veritate; filiuni → filium; transferro → transferre.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.6 (PL 38:95; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.7PL 38:95

Quando autem simulationi tantum licebit, ut falso justitiæ nomine, nullo prohibente, glorietur, et spirituale vivum opus, quod ipsa non genuit, et quod in se aliquando genuerat, pondere crudelissimi soporis exstinxit, ad fallacem jactantiam materni nominis applicet sibi, et scelera sua bonis atque innocentibus objiciendo supponat? Quando ergo simulatio ita regnabit, nisi cum abundabit iniquitas, id est, tenebræ peccatorum quasi cæca nocte praevalebunt; et refrigescet charitas multorum, id est, operis spiritualis tanquam vivi pueri interitum obdormiet? Tamen quia ita refrigescet charitas, ut negligentius ferveat; non enim dictum est, Penitus exstinguatur, ut omnino non sit: sic dormivit hæc mater, ut non occideret filium; sed tamen fraudibus simulationis dederit locum. Sed expergefacta, cum impietatem, quam ipsa non fecit, ab eis qui faciunt sibi objici viderit, et spirituali opere gratiæ, quam custodivit, cernit simulationem audere gloriari, se iniquitatis operatricem, simulationem vero matrem boni operis nominari, pacifici Judicis implorat auxilium. Nam Salomon Pacificus interpretatur. Quem videmus duas protulisse sententias: primam tanquam ignorantis; ultimam vero cum manifesta cognitione judicantis. Certamen pietatis prima proponit; dat præmium secunda victori: in prima probatur mater, in ultima lætatur: in prima flens mittit semen suum, in secunda cum exsultatione reportat manipulos suos. Quod pertinet ad duo tempora Ecclesiæ, quae Dominus Christus judex pacificus moderatur; unum quod nunc est, alterum quod futurum est: in isto probamur, in illo coronamur.

But when will pretence be allowed so much that it boasts of a false name of righteousness with no one forbidding it, and claims for itself, in deceitful pretension to the name of mother, the living spiritual work which it did not beget, and which it had once begotten in itself and smothered by the weight of a most cruel sleep, and substitutes its own crimes by charging them on the good and innocent? When will pretence reign like this, if not when iniquity abounds, that is, when the darkness of sins prevails as in a blind night; and the love of many grows cold, that is, falls asleep over the spiritual work as over the living child? Yet because love will grow cold in such a way that it burns more negligently (for it was not said that it will be utterly extinguished so as not to exist at all), so this mother slept without killing her son; but still she gave room to the frauds of pretence. But when she wakes, and sees herself charged by those who commit it with an impiety she did not commit, and sees pretence daring to boast of the spiritual work of grace which she has kept, herself being called the worker of iniquity and pretence the mother of the good work, she implores the help of the peaceful Judge. For Solomon means Peaceful. We see that he delivered two sentences: the first as though not knowing, the last as judging with clear knowledge. The first sets the contest of devotion; the second gives the prize to the victor: in the first the mother is tested, in the last she rejoices; in the first, weeping, she sows her seed; in the second, with exultation, she brings back her sheaves. This belongs to the two times of the Church, which the Lord Christ, the peaceful judge, governs: one which is now, the other which is to come; in this one we are tested, in that one we are crowned.

Matt 24:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 126:5–6 (125:5-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 3:25–27 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: When iniquity abounds and love grows cold, pretence claims the good and blames the innocent; Solomon's two sentences signify Christ's testing of the Church now and his crowning of her at the end.

  • Matt 24:12; Ps 126:5-6 (Latin Ps 125:5-6); 1 Kgs 3:25-27.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): liccbit → licebit; applicct → applicet; objicicndo → objiciendo; Quando ero simulatio → Quando ergo simulatio; peccalorum quasi cæca pocte → peccatorum quasi cæca nocte; viyi pueri inter obdormict? Tamcn → vivi pueri interitum obdormiet? Tamen; spirituali opero → spirituali opere; audero gloriari, se iniquitatis opcratricem, simulationem vcro → audere gloriari, se iniquitatis operatricem, simulationem vero; prolulissc → protulisse; ignoranlis → ignorantis; sccunda → secunda.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.7 (PL 38:95; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

10.8PL 38:95–97

Sed nulla major est in Christi Ecclesia probatio charitatis, quam cum etiam honor ipse, qui apud homines videtur esse, contemnitur, ne membra parvuli dividantur, et unitatis discidio christiana dilanietur infirmitas. Dicit enim Apostolus tanquam matrem se exhibuisse parvulis, in quibus bonum opus evangelicum fecerat; non ipse, sed gratia Dei cum illo. Nam illa meretrix sua non poterat dicere nisi peccata: donum autem fecunditatis ex Deo. Tanto autem amplius diligitur gratia donantis, quanto supplicium debebatur. Et bene de meretrice Dominus ait: Cui plurimum dimittitur, plurimum diligit. Dicit ergo apostolus Paulus: Factus sum parvulus in medio vestrum, tanquam si nutrix foveat filios suos (I Thess. II, 7). Sed cum ad periculum ventum fuerit, quo parvulus dividatur, cum sibi honorem falsum simulatio vindicat, et scindere parata est unitatem; contemnat mater honorem suum, dum filium videat integrum, vivumque servet; ne forte cum debitum visceribus suis honorem pertinacius vindicat, det locum simulationi per machæram schismatis infirma membra dividere. Dicat ergo charitas mater, Date illi puerum. Sive occasione, sive veritate Christus annuntietur (Philipp. I, 18). In Moyse charitas clamat, Domine, aut ignosce illis, aut dele me de libro tuo (Exod. x I XII, 51, 32). In Pharisæis autem simulatio loquitur, Si dimiserimus eum, veniunt Romani, et tollunt nobis gentem et locum. Non enim veritatem, sed nomen volebant habere justitiæ, et honorem debitum justis per fallaciam tenere cupiebant. Tamen regnans in eis simulatio cathedram Moysi sedere permissa est, ut dici posset a Domino, Quæ dicunt, facite; sed quæ faciunt, facere nolite. Ut honorem falsum habentes, veritate tamen Scripturarum parvulos infirmosque nutrirent. Simulatio enim suum habet scelus, quo novum hominem, quem per gratiam donantis acceperat, pondere suæ dormitionis exstinxit: sed lac fidei quod habet, non est ejus. Quia etiam necato parvulo, qui renascentem vitam significat, jam in malis moribus simulatio constituta, retinet tamen in memoria, tanquam in uberibus, verba fidei doctrinamque christianam, quæ omnibus ad Ecclesiam venientibus traditur. Ex isto lacte poterat etiam falsa mater veræ tamen fidei succum sugenti parvulo infundere. Inde secura est vera mater, cum etiam a simulatoribus in Ecclesia parvulus ejus divinarum Scripturarum catholicæ fidei lacte nutritur, cum prohibita divisione unitas salva est, et sententia judicis ultima, qua ultimum Christi judicium figuratur, probata charitas, quæ propter salutem parvuli et unitatis firmamentum etiam simulationi honorem cessit, ut amorem tenens complexumque vitalis gratiæ, sempiterno piæ matris præmio perfruatur.

But there is no greater proof of love in Christ's Church than when even the honor that seems to exist among men is despised, so that the little one's limbs may not be divided and Christian weakness torn apart by the rending of unity. For the Apostle says that he showed himself like a mother to the little ones in whom he had produced the good work of the Gospel; not he, but the grace of God with him. For that harlot could call nothing her own but her sins: the gift of fruitfulness was from God. And the grace of the giver is loved the more, the more punishment was due. And the Lord well said of the sinful woman, "He to whom more is forgiven loves more." So the apostle Paul says: "I became a little one among you, like a nurse cherishing her children." But when it comes to the danger that the little one may be divided, when pretence claims a false honor for itself and is ready to split unity, let the mother despise her own honor, so long as she sees her son whole and keeps him alive; lest, by claiming too stubbornly the honor due to her womb, she give pretence room to divide the weak limbs with the sword of schism. So let mother love say, "Give her the child." "Whether in pretence or in truth, let Christ be proclaimed." In Moses love cries out, "Lord, either forgive them, or blot me out of your book." But in the Pharisees pretence speaks: "If we let him go, the Romans will come and take away our nation and place." For they wanted to have not the truth but the name of righteousness, and desired to hold by deceit the honor due to the righteous. Yet the pretence reigning in them was permitted to sit in the chair of Moses, so that the Lord could say, "What they say, do; but what they do, do not do." So that, though holding a false honor, they still nourished the little ones and the weak with the truth of the Scriptures. For pretence has its own crime, by which it smothered with the weight of its sleep the new man it had received by the grace of the giver; but the milk of faith which it has is not its own. For even when the little one, who signifies the life that is reborn, has been killed, pretence, now settled in bad ways, still keeps in its memory, as in its breasts, the words of faith and Christian teaching which are handed on to all who come to the Church. From this milk even the false mother could give the sucking infant the nourishment of the true faith. Hence the true mother is secure when, even through pretenders in the Church, her little one is nourished with the milk of the divine Scriptures and of the Catholic faith, when division has been prevented and unity is safe; and by the judge's last sentence, by which the last judgment of Christ is figured, love that has been proved, which for the little one's safety and the strength of unity yielded honor even to pretence, holding love and the embrace of living grace, enjoys the everlasting reward of a devoted mother.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

1 Cor 15:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 7:47 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 32:31–32 (quotation, high confidence) · John 11:48 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 23:2–3 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The greatest proof of love is to give up one's own honor rather than divide the Church; even hypocrites in the Church nourish believers with the milk of Scripture, and love will be rewarded at the last judgment.

  • Augustine applies the story to the Donatist schism: better to yield honor than to divide the Church. Quotations: 1 Cor 15:10; Luke 7:47; 1 Thess 2:7; Phil 1:18; Exod 32:31-32; John 11:48; Matt 23:2-3. The last sentence is compressed and partly corrupt in the digital text ("ut amorem tenens"); translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): major cst in Christi Ecclesia 2 → major est in Christi Ecclesia; ex Dco → ex Deo; EI. bene → Et bene; dimiltitur → dimittitur; TAces → Thess; quo parvulos dividatur → quo parvulus dividatur; honorcm falsum → honorem falsum; visceribus sais → visceribus suis; gentem it locum → gentem et locum; vcriiatem → veritatem; debitura justis per fal laciam → debitum justis per fallaciam; regnans in cis → regnans in eis; exstinxit sed lac → exstinxit: sed lac; Quia eliam → Quia etiam; iti memoria → in memoria; doclrinamque → doctrinamque; Indc secura cst → Inde secura est; nUtritur → nutritur; tcnebs → tenens.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 10.8 (PL 38:95–97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-10-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-10-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

Chapter 11

11.1PL 38:97

Dominus Deus noster nolens aliquem nostrum perire, excolens Ecclesiam suam velut agrum suum, quærens fructum de arboribus suis, antequam tempus securis adveniat, cum necesse erit infructuosas arbores amputare, non cessat admonere, ut cum tempus est, et cum Dei adjutorio in nostra potestate consistit, bona opera faciamus. Cum enim transierit tempus bene operandi, non restat nisi recipiendi. Nemo tibi dicturus est post resurrectionem mortuorum in regno Dei, Frange esurienti panem tuum; quia non invenies esurientem. Nemo dicturus est, Vesti nudum, ubi omnium tunica immortalitas erit. Nemo dicturus est, Suscipe peregrinum, ubi omnes in patria sua vivent. Nam modo sumus inde peregrini. Nemo dicet, Visita aegrum, ubi est sanitas sempiterna. Nemo dicet, Sepeli mortuum, ubi mors moritur. Ista omnia pietatis officia in vita æterna necessaria non erunt, ubi sola pax erit et laetitia sempiterna. In isto autem tempore, ut noverimus quantum nobis commendat Deus opera misericordiae, etiam ipsos sanctos suos egere fecit; ut cum fiunt hic amici de mammona iniquitatis, recipiant et ipsi amicos suos in æterna tabernacula: id est, ut cum servis Dei, qui dum jugiter Deo vacant, aliquoties indigent, illi qui habent mundi divitias, eleemosynam largiuntur, quomodo eos participes faciunt in terrena substantia, sic cum illis partem habere mereantur in vita æterna.

The Lord our God, not wanting any of us to perish, tending his Church like his field, seeking fruit from his trees before the time of the axe comes, when it will be necessary to cut down the fruitless trees, does not stop warning us to do good works while there is time and while, with God's help, it lies in our power. For when the time for doing good has passed, nothing remains but the time for receiving. No one will say to you after the resurrection of the dead, in the kingdom of God, "Break your bread to the hungry," because you will not find anyone hungry. No one will say, "Clothe the naked," where everyone's tunic will be immortality. No one will say, "Take in the stranger," where all will live in their own homeland. For now we are strangers from there. No one will say, "Visit the sick," where there is everlasting health. No one will say, "Bury the dead," where death dies. All these duties of devotion will not be necessary in eternal life, where there will be only peace and everlasting joy. But in this time, so that we may know how much God commends works of mercy to us, he has made even his saints to be in need; so that when friends are made here by means of the mammon of iniquity, they too may receive their friends into the eternal tabernacles: that is, so that when those who have the riches of the world give alms to the servants of God, who, while they are constantly free for God, are sometimes in need, then, as they make them sharers in earthly goods, so they may be found worthy to have a share with them in eternal life.

2 Pet 3:9 (echo, medium confidence) · Matt 3:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 58:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:35–36 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:54 (echo, medium confidence) · Luke 16:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Works of mercy are possible only in this life, where there are hungry, naked, strangers and sick; God lets his saints be in need so that the rich may share with them and be received with them into eternal life.

  • 2 Pet 3:9; Luke 13:6-9; Matt 3:10; Isa 58:7; Matt 25:35-36; Tob 1:17-20 (burying the dead); 1 Cor 15:54; Luke 16:9.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): erit' infructuosas → erit infructuosas; rccipieudi → recipiendi; vita.eterna → vita æterna; æterna. tabernacula → æterna tabernacula; servis Det → servis Dei; haberc mereantur in vita æterna 2. → habere mereantur in vita æterna..

Topics: Ethics, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 11.1 (PL 38:97; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-11-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-11-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

11.2PL 38:97–99

Hoc dixi propter lectionem Regnorum, quam primo audivimus. Numquid Deus defecerat pascere servum suum Eliam? Nonne illi, quia deerant homines, alites ministrabant? Nonne illi panem afferebat corvus mane, et ad vesperam carnes? Ostendit ergo Deus quia unde voluerit, et quomodo voluerit, potest pascere servos suos: et tamen ut posset cum religiosa vidua pascere, fecit eum egere. Egestas animæ sanctæ in abundantiam versa est animæ religiosae. Non poterat Elias de misericordia Dei dare sibi, quod lagunculæ dedit? Videtis nempe, et manifestum est, quod aliquando servi Dei ideo non habent, ut probentur qui habent. Et tamen illa vidua nihil habebat: quod illi reliquum erat, finitum fuerat, et cum suis filiis moritura erat. Processit ergo, ut faceret sibi panem, colligere duo ligna: et tunc eam vidit Elias. Tunc eam homo Dei videbat, quando illa duo ligna quærebat. Mulier illa typum gerebat Ecclesiæ: et quia duo ligna crucem faciunt, quærebat moritura, unde semper esset victura. Adumbrato ergo mysterio, Elias loquitur ad eam quod audivit: narrat illa dispositionem suam, morituram se dicit, cum consummaverit quod remansit. Ubi est ergo quod Dominus dixerat Eliæ, Vade in Sarepta Sidoniæ; ibi enim mandavi viduæ, ut pascat te? Videtis quemadmodum mandat Deus, non in aure, sed in corde. Numquid legimus quia missus est aliquis propheta ad illam mulierem, et dictum est ei, Hæc dicit Dominus, Venturus est ad te esuriens servus meus, ex eo quod habes ministra illi: inopiam noli timere; ego supplebo quod dederis? Hoc ei dictum non legimus. Nec hoc legimus, quod in somnis ad eam missus fuerit angelus, et prænuntiaverit Eliam esurientem esse venturum, et de illo pascendo aliquis mulierem illam admonuerit. Sed mandat Deus miris modis, qui in cogitationibus loquitur. Dicimus mandasse Deum loquendo in corde, suggerendo quod opus erat, persuadendo quod utile erat rationali animae viduæ mulieris. Sic etiam in Prophetis legimus, quod Dominus mandaverit vermi, ut roderet radicem cucurbitae (Jonæ IV, 7). Quid est, Mandavit, nisi, Cor præparavit? Inspiratione itaque Domini, vidua illa mulier cor præparatum habebat ad obediendum. Talis venerat, talis cum Elia loquebatur. Qui erat in Elia ut praeciperet, ipse erat in vidua ut obediret. Vade, inquit, mihi prius fac de egestate tua; non deficient divitiae tuae. Patrimonium enim viduæ, modicum erat farinae et modicum olei: hoc modicum non defecit. Quis habet talem villam? Libenter vidua servum Dei esurientem pascebat, quia patrimonium ejus in clavo pendebat. Quid felicius hac paupertate? Si hic talia recipit, qualia in fine sperabit?

I said this because of the reading from the Kingdoms which we heard first. Had God failed to feed his servant Elijah? Did not birds serve him, since men were lacking? Did not a raven bring him bread in the morning and meat in the evening? So God showed that he can feed his servants from wherever he wills and however he wills: and yet, so that he might feed him with a devout widow, he made him be in need. The want of a holy soul was turned into abundance for a devout soul. Could Elijah not have given himself, from the mercy of God, what he gave to the little jar? You surely see, and it is plain, that sometimes the servants of God do not have, precisely so that those who have may be tested. And yet that widow had nothing: what she had left had run out, and she was about to die with her children. So she went out to gather two sticks to make herself bread: and then Elijah saw her. The man of God saw her just when she was looking for those two sticks. That woman bore the type of the Church: and because two pieces of wood make a cross, she, about to die, was looking for that by which she would live for ever. So, with the mystery foreshadowed, Elijah speaks to her what he heard: she tells her situation, says she will die when she has used up what remains. Where, then, is what the Lord had said to Elijah, "Go to Zarephath of Sidon; for I have commanded a widow there to feed you"? You see how God commands: not in the ear, but in the heart. Do we read that some prophet was sent to that woman and it was said to her, "Thus says the Lord: My servant will come to you hungry; serve him from what you have: do not fear want; I will make up what you give"? We do not read that this was said to her. Nor do we read that an angel was sent to her in her sleep and announced that Elijah would come hungry, and that someone admonished that woman about feeding him. But God, who speaks in thoughts, commands in wonderful ways. We say that God commanded by speaking in the heart, suggesting what was needed, persuading the rational soul of the widow woman of what was useful. So too we read in the Prophets that the Lord commanded a worm to gnaw the root of the gourd. What does "commanded" mean, if not "prepared its heart"? So by the Lord's inspiration that widow woman had a heart prepared to obey. Such she had come, such she spoke with Elijah. He who was in Elijah to command was himself in the widow to obey. "Go," he says, "first make something for me from your want; your riches will not fail." For the widow's patrimony was a little flour and a little oil: this little did not fail. Who has such an estate? The widow gladly fed the hungry servant of God, because her patrimony hung on a nail. What is happier than this poverty? If she receives such things here, what will she hope for at the end?

1 Kgs 17:4–16 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 17:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 17:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Jonah 4:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God, who could feed Elijah by ravens, made him need the widow of Zarephath so she might be tested and blessed; God "commanded" her not by a word but by inspiring her heart, and her two sticks prefigure the cross.

  • The opening words of the digital text, "Mandare Deus quomodo intelligitur," are Migne's marginal heading and are removed. 1 Kgs 17:4-16 (Latin 3 Kings); Jonah 4:7. "Her patrimony hung on a nail": the oil jar hung on the wall; Augustine contrasts it with landed estates.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left at the start of the text; removed; OCR slip in the digital text): Mandare Deus quomodo intelligitur. Hoc dixi → Hoc dixi; defccerat → defecerat; alTerebat → afferebat; cum rcligiosa vidua pascere, feci; → cum religiosa vidua pascere, fecit; animæ rcligiosae → animæ religiosae; misericordia Det → misericordia Dei; Tunc cam homo → Tunc eam homo; dispoSitionem → dispositionem; Domiuus → Dominus; in anTe → in aure; Hxc dicit → Hæc dicit; Iloc ei → Hoc ei; et ile illo → et de illo; mu- Heris → mulieris; roderetradiccm → roderet radicem; praparatum → præparatum; miti prius → mihi prius; villam 1? → villam?; servum Dci → servum Dei; bac paupertate → hac paupertate.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 11.2 (PL 38:97–99; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-11-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-11-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

11.3PL 38:99

Ideo hoc dixi, ut seminationis nostrae mercedem, non isto tempore quo seminamus speremus. Hic enim bonorum operum messem cum labore serimus, sed in futuro fructus illius cum gaudio colligemus; secundum illud quod scriptum est, Euntes ibant et flebant, mittentes semina sua; venientes autem venient cum exsultatione, portantes manipulos suos. Illud enim pro signo factum est, non pro dono. Nam si vidua illa quod pavit hominem Dei, hic recepit, non est magnum quod seminavit; quia non magnam segetem messuit. Temporale est quod accepit, non deficientem farinam, nec diminutum oleum, quousque daret Deus pluviam super terram (III Reg. XVII). Ac sic tunc magis cœpit egere, quando dignatus est Deus pluere: tunc enim laboratura erat, exspectatura agri fructus et collectura. Quando autem non pluebat, victus ejus de facili veniebat. Signum hoc ipsum quod Deus illi ad paucos dies præstiterat, signum erat futuri vitae, ubi merces nostra deficere nescit. Farina nostra Deus erit. Quomodo illa per illos dies non defecerunt, sic ille non deficiet in aeternum. Talem mercedem speremus, quando bona facimus: ne forte aliquis vestrum tentetur tali cogitatione, ut dicat, Pascam aliquem servum Dei esurientem, ut lagena mea non deficiat, et in cupa mea semper vinum inveniam. Noli hoc hic quærere. Semina securus, messis tua serius veniet, tardius veniet: sed cum venerit, finem non habebit.

I said this so that we may not hope for the reward of our sowing in this time in which we sow. For here we sow the harvest of good works with toil, but in the future we shall gather its fruit with joy; as it is written, "Going, they went and wept, scattering their seeds; but coming, they will come with exultation, carrying their sheaves." For that was done as a sign, not as a payment. For if that widow received here for feeding the man of God, what she sowed is not great, because she did not reap a great crop. What she received is temporal: flour that did not run out and oil that did not diminish, until God gave rain upon the earth. And so she began to be in greater need just when God deigned to send rain: for then she was going to toil, to wait for the fruits of the field and gather them. But when it was not raining, her food came easily. That very sign which God granted her for a few days was a sign of the future life, where our reward knows no failing. God will be our flour. As those did not fail during those days, so he will not fail for ever. Let us hope for such a reward when we do good; lest perhaps one of you be tempted by a thought like this, saying, "I will feed some hungry servant of God, so that my jug may not run out and I may always find wine in my vat." Do not look for this here. Sow without anxiety; your harvest will come later, it will come more slowly: but when it comes, it will have no end.

Ps 126:6 (125:6 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 17:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 6:9 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The widow's unfailing flour and oil were a sign of the endless reward to come, not a payment; we should do good expecting our harvest in eternity, not here.

  • Ps 126:6 (Latin Ps 125:6); 1 Kgs 17:14 (Latin 3 Kings 17). The "V" after "in æternum" in the digital text is a stray mark.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text): Hic cnim bonorum opernm → Hic enim bonorum operum; scrimus → serimus; colligcmus → colligemus; qnod seminavit → quod seminavit; necdiminuluro → nec diminutum; plucre → pluere; aeternum V Talem → aeternum. Talem.

Topics: Ethics, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 11.3 (PL 38:99; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/10-1/#p-11-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-11-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).