Sermons to the People 95.1–96.9
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 95
95.1PL 38:367
Scripturas sanctas exponentes vobis, quasi panes frangimus vobis. Vos esurientes accipite, et saginam laudis corde eructuate: et qui estis divites in epulis, nolite macri esse in opcribus et factis bonis. Quod cgo erogo vobis, non est meum. Quod manducatis, manduco: unde vivitis, vivo. Commune habemus in cœlo cellarium: inde enim venit verbum Dei.
When we explain the holy Scriptures to you, it is as if we were breaking bread for you. Receive it hungrily, and let your hearts belch forth the rich fare of praise; and you who are rich in feasts, do not be lean in works and good deeds. What I pay out to you is not mine. What you eat, I eat; what you live on, I live on. We have a common storeroom in heaven: for from there comes the word of God.
Mark 8:1–9 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Explaining Scripture is breaking bread for the people, from a storeroom in heaven that preacher and hearers share.
- The reading is the feeding of the four thousand with seven loaves (Mark 8:1–9).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Scripturas sanetas exponentes → Scripturas sanctas exponentes.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.1 (PL 38:367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
95.2PL 38:367
Septem panes significant septiformem operationem Spiritus sancti: quatuor millia hominum, Ecclesiam sub quatuor Evangeliis constitutam: septem sportæ fragmentorum, perfectionem Ecclesiæ. Hoc enim numero saepissime perfectio figuratur. Unde est enim quod dictum est, Septies in die laudabo te? Numquid errat homo, qui toties laudaverit Dominum? Quid est ergo, Septies laudabo; nisi, Nunquam a laude cessabo? Totum enim tempus significat qui dicit, septies. Unde septem dierum volumine sæcula provolvuntur. Quid est crgo, Septies in die laudabo te, nisi quod alio loco dicitur, Semper laus ejus in ore meo? Propter ipsam perfectionem ad septem Ecclesias scribit Joannes. Apocalypsis liber est sancti Joannis evangelistæ: scribit ad septem Ecclesias. Veraces estote, sportas agnoscite. Non enim fragmenta illa perierunt: sed quia et vos ad Ecclesiam pertinetis, vobis utique profccerunt. Quod vobis ista expono, Christo ministro: vos cum tranquille auditis, discumbitis. Ego corpore sedeo, corde consisto, et sollicitus ministro vobis; ne forte aliquem vestrum oflendat vasculum, non cibus. Epulas Dei nostis, sæpe audistis, mentes quærunt, non ventres.
The seven loaves signify the sevenfold working of the Holy Spirit; the four thousand men, the church established under the four Gospels; the seven baskets of fragments, the perfection of the church. For by this number perfection is very often figured. For why was it said, “Seven times a day I will praise you”? Does a man go wrong who has praised the Lord that many times? What, then, does “seven times I will praise” mean, if not, “I will never cease from praise”? For he who says “seven times” signifies all time. Hence the ages roll on in a cycle of seven days. What, then, is “seven times a day I will praise you,” if not what is said in another place, “His praise is always in my mouth”? Because of this very perfection John writes to seven churches. The Apocalypse is a book of holy John the evangelist: he writes to seven churches. Be greedy eaters; recognize the baskets. For those fragments were not lost; but because you too belong to the church, they have surely profited you. In explaining these things to you, I serve Christ; you, when you listen quietly, are reclining at table. I sit in body, I stand in heart, and I serve you anxiously, lest perhaps the dish, not the food, should offend any of you. You know God’s banquets; you have often heard: they look for minds, not bellies.
Mark 8:5–9 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 11:2–3 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 119:164 (118:164 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 34:1 (33:2 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 1:4 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The seven loaves signify the sevenfold work of the Spirit, the four thousand the church of the four Gospels, and the seven baskets the church’s perfection, seven standing for all time.
- Quotations: Ps 119:164 (118:164 Vulg.); Ps 34:1 (33:2 Vulg.); seven churches, Rev 1:4, 11. Augustine ascribes the Apocalypse to John the evangelist. The feeding: Mark 8:5–9 (Matt 15:34–38). “Be greedy eaters” follows the probable reading voraces; the digital text has veraces (“truthful”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slips; stray mark): Septies in dit laudabo te? Numquid errat homo, qAi toties → Septies in die laudabo te? Numquid errat homo, qui toties; sæcula provolvuntur I. → sæcula provolvuntur..
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.2 (PL 38:367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
95.3PL 38:367
Certe saginata sunt quatuor millia hominum de septem panibus: quid mirabilius? Et tamen parum erat, nisi etiam sportæ septem de fragmentis residuis implerentur. 0 magna mysteria! operabantur, et opera loquebantur. Facta illa si intelligas, verba sunt. Et vos ad quatuor millia pertinetis, quia sub Evangelio quaternario vivitis. Ad nurnerum non pertinuerunt pucri et mulieres. Sic enim dictum est; Erant autem qui manducaverunt quatuor millia hominum, exceptis pueris et mulieribus. Quasi sine numcro essent insensati ct effeminati. Tamen manducent et ipsi. Manducent: forte pueri crescunt, et non erunt pueri; forte effeminati corriguntur, et castilicantur. Manducent: erogamus, impendimus. Qui sint autem isti, Deus inspicit convivium suum, ct si se non correxerint, qui novit invitare, novit et separare.
Certainly four thousand men were fed on seven loaves: what more wonderful? And yet it was too little unless seven baskets were also filled from the fragments left over. O great mysteries! They were doing works, and the works were speaking. Those deeds, if you understand them, are words. You too belong to the four thousand, because you live under the fourfold Gospel. Children and women were not counted. For so it was said: “Those who ate were four thousand men, not counting children and women.” As if the foolish and the effeminate were without number. Yet let them eat too. Let them eat: perhaps the children grow and will no longer be children; perhaps the effeminate are corrected and made chaste. Let them eat: we pay out, we spend. But who they are, God looks over his banquet; and if they do not correct themselves, he who knows how to invite knows also how to separate.
Matt 15:37–38 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 8:8–9 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The miracle’s deeds speak as words: the hearers are the four thousand under the fourfold Gospel, and the uncounted children and women stand for the foolish and effeminate, who are still fed in the hope that they will change.
- The opening words “Mysteria in iis qui saturati sunt de septem panibus” (“Mysteries in those who were fed from the seven loaves”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotation: Matt 15:38. Augustine’s allegory of the women as “effeminate” is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip): Mysteria in iia qui saturati sunt de septem panibus. Certe → Certe; nisi etiam sporta: septem → nisi etiam sportæ septem; exceptia pueris et mulieribus → exceptis pueris et mulieribus.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.3 (PL 38:367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
95.4PL 38:367–368
Nostis, charissimi: recolite evangelicam parabolam; quia intravit Dominus inspicere recumbentes in quodam convivio suo. Paterfamilias qui invitaverat, sicut scripium est, invenit ibi hominem non vestitum vestem nuptialem (Jd. xxn, 11). Ad nuptias enim invitaverat sponsus ille speciosus forma præ filiis hominum. Sponsus ille fœdus factus propter sponsam foedam, ut eam faceret pulchram. Unde foedus factus est pulcher? Si non probo, blasphemo. Dat mihi pulchritudinis ejus testimonium propheta, dicens: Speciosus forma præ filiis hominum. Dat mihi deformi. talis ejus testimonium alius propheta, dicens: Vidimus eum, et non habebat speciem neque decorem; sed vultus ejus abjectus, deformis positio ejus (Isai. liii, i). 0 propheta qui dixisli, Speciosus forma præ filiis hominum, contradicitur libi: alius propheta procedit conlra te, et dicit, Mentiris: Vidimus eum. Quid ost quod dicit, Speciosus forma præ filiis hominum? Vidimus eum non habentem speciem neque decorem. Ergo isti prophetae duo in angulo pacis discordant? Do Christo ambo dixerunt, de lapide angulari ambo dixerunt. In angulo concordant parietes. Si non concordaverunt, non est ædificium, sed ruina. Concordaut Prophetæ, non eos dimittamus in rixa. Imo nos eorum pacem cognoscamus: nam illi litigare non norunt. 0 Propheta qni dixisti, Speciosus forma præ filiis hominum, ubi vidisti? Responde, responde, ubi vidisti? Cum in forMa Dei esset non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Ibi vidi. An tu dubitas cum qui æqualis est Deo, speciosum esse præ (iliis hominum? Respondisti: respondeat ille qui dixit, Vidimus eum, et non habebat speciem neque decorem. Dixisti: dic ubi vidisti. A verbis ipsius sumit exordium: ubi ille finivit, ibi iste incipit. Ubi ille finivilt? Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Ecce ubi vidit speciosum forma præ filiis hominum: dic tu, ubi vidisti quia non habehat speciem neque decorem. Sed semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens; in similitudinem hominum fetus, et habitu inventus ut homo. De dcformitate ipsius adhuc dicit: Humilsavit se ipsum, factus obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis (Philipp. n, 6-8). Ecce ubi vidi. Concordant ergo ambo pacifici, et pacati sunt ambo. Quid est speciosius Deo? Quid dcformius Crucifixo? Iste ergo sponsus speciosus forma præ filiis hominum, deformis factus ut pulchram faceret sponsam, cui dicitur, O decora inter mulieres! de quj dicitur?Quæ eat ista quæ ascendit dealbata. illuminata, non colore mendacii fuscata? invenit ergo iste qui vocavit ad nupLias, bominem non habentem vestem nuptialem, et ait illi, Amice, quid huc intrasti non habens vestem nuptialem? At ille obmutuit. Non onim invenit quod responderet. Et ait paterfamilias qui intraverat: Ligate illi manus et pedes, et projicite illum in tenebras exteriores: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium. De tam parva culpa tam magna paena? Magna enim. Parva dicitur culpa non habere vestem nuptialem: parva, sed non intelligentibus. Quando ille sic succenscret, quando ille sic judicaret, ut propter vestem nnpiialem quam non habebat, mitteret cum ligatis manibus et pedibus in tenebras exteriores, ubi csset fletus et stridor dentium, nisi culpa esset valde gravis vestem non habere nuptialem? Dico: quia per me invitati estis, et si vos ille invitavit, per nos invitavit. In convivio estis omnes, habetote vestem noptialem. Expono quæest, ut omnes habeatis, et si aliquis me non audit qui non habet, antequam veniat paterfamilias ct convivas suos inspiciat, mulelur in mclius, accipiat vestem nuplialem, securus discumbat.
You know, dearly beloved; recall the Gospel parable, that the Lord came in to look at those reclining at a banquet of his. The householder who had invited them, as it is written, found there a man not clothed in a wedding garment. For that bridegroom “fair in form beyond the sons of men” had invited them to a wedding: that bridegroom who became ugly for the sake of an ugly bride, to make her beautiful. How was he who became ugly beautiful? If I do not prove it, I blaspheme. A prophet gives me testimony to his beauty, saying, “Fair in form beyond the sons of men.” Another prophet gives me testimony to his ugliness, saying, “We saw him, and he had no form or comeliness; but his face was despised, his bearing unsightly.” O prophet who said, “Fair in form beyond the sons of men,” you are contradicted: another prophet comes out against you and says, “You lie: we saw him.” What does it mean that he says, “Fair in form beyond the sons of men”? “We saw him having no form or comeliness.” Are these two prophets, then, at odds in the corner of peace? Both spoke of Christ; both spoke of the cornerstone. At the corner the walls agree. If they did not agree, there is no building, but a ruin. The prophets agree; let us not leave them quarrelling. Rather let us recognize their peace: for they do not know how to dispute. O prophet who said, “Fair in form beyond the sons of men,” where did you see it? Answer, answer, where did you see it? “Though he was in the form of God, he did not count it robbery to be equal with God.” There I saw it. Or do you doubt that he who is equal to God is fair beyond the sons of men? You have answered; let him answer who said, “We saw him, and he had no form or comeliness.” You have said it; say where you saw it. He takes his beginning from the other’s words: where the one ended, there the other begins. Where did the one end? “Who, though he was in the form of God, did not count it robbery to be equal with God.” See where he saw him fair in form beyond the sons of men. You, say where you saw that he had no form or comeliness. “But he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men and found in appearance as a man.” Of his ugliness he says further: “He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even death on a cross.” See where I saw it. So both agree, peaceable both, and both at peace. What is fairer than God? What uglier than the Crucified? So this bridegroom, fair in form beyond the sons of men, became ugly to make his bride beautiful, to whom it is said, “O fairest among women!”, of whom it is said, “Who is this who comes up made white?”, made bright, not darkened by the color of falsehood. This man, then, who called them to the wedding found a man without a wedding garment, and said to him, “Friend, why did you come in here without a wedding garment?” And he was silent: for he found nothing to answer. And the householder who had come in said: “Bind his hands and feet, and throw him into the outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” For so small a fault so great a punishment? Great indeed. Not to have a wedding garment is called a small fault: small, but only to those who do not understand. When would he have been so angry, when would he have judged so as to send him, bound hand and foot, into the outer darkness where there would be weeping and gnashing of teeth, because of the wedding garment he did not have, unless it were a very grave fault not to have a wedding garment? I say this because you were invited through me; and if he invited you, he invited you through us. You are all at the banquet; have the wedding garment. I am explaining what it is, so that you may all have it; and if anyone who does not have it is listening to me, let him change for the better before the householder comes and looks over his guests; let him take the wedding garment and recline in safety.
Matt 22:11–13 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 45:2 (44:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 53:2–3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 118:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 2:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 2:6–8 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 8:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is the bridegroom both fairest in the form of God and disfigured in the form of a servant, as the two prophets agree; the guest without a wedding garment shows that lacking it is a grave fault.
- Quotations: Matt 22:11–13; Ps 45:2 (44:3 Vulg.); Isa 53:2–3; Ps 118:22 (cornerstone); Phil 2:6–8; Song 1:8; Song 8:5 (LXX “made white”). Migne’s paragraph 5 begins inside this staged section (his marginal heading “The guest without a wedding garment rejected” was removed by the importer); the paragraph number is not in the staged text.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): Vidinius eum, et non habebat → Vidimus eum, et non habebat; Qni cum informa Dei esset, noM rapinam arbitratus eat esse aqualis Deo. → Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo.; Efce ubi vidi. Concor dant → Ecce ubi vidi. Concordant; Amice, quid huc intratsi nan habens → Amice, quid huc intrasti non habens.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.4 (PL 38:367–368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
95.6PL 38:368
Non enim vere, charissimi, ille qui inde projectus est unum bominem significat: absit. Multi sunt. Et ipse Dominus qui hanc parabolam proposuit, Sponsus ipse convivii convocalor et convivarum vivificator, ipse nobis exposuit, quia homo ille non unum hominem significat, sed multos, ibi, in ipso loco, in cadem parabola. Non eo longe, ibi expono, ibi frango et manducandum appono. Ait enim, cum inde missus esset ille non habens vestem nuptialem in tenebras exteriores: ait ergo, ct secutus adjunxit, Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi (Matth. x XII, 11-14). Unum hinc projecisti, et dicis, Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci electi. Sine dubio electi non sunt projecti: et ipsi erant pauci qui discmubentes remanscraut; et mulli crant in illo uno, qnia ille unus unum corpus malorum est, qui non habet vestem nuptialem.
For truly, dearly beloved, the man who was thrown out from there does not signify one man; God forbid. They are many. And the Lord himself who set forth this parable, the bridegroom himself, the one who called the banquet together and gives life to the guests, has himself explained to us that that man signifies not one man but many: there, in that very place, in the same parable. I do not go far afield; there I explain, there I break the bread and set it out to be eaten. For when the man without a wedding garment had been sent from there into the outer darkness, he went on and added: “For many are called, but few are chosen.” You threw out one from here, and you say, “For many are called, but few are chosen.” Without doubt the chosen were not thrown out; and they were the few who had remained reclining; and the many were in that one, because that one who has no wedding garment is the one body of the wicked.
Matt 22:13–14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The one guest thrown out signifies the many, the single body of the wicked, as Christ’s words “many are called, but few are chosen” show.
- The staged text notes that the paragraph number jumps from 4 to 6; paragraph 5 is inside 95.4 (see there). Quotation: Matt 22:13–14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slips; OCR slips and divided word): Non eolonpc, ibi expono → Non eo longe, ibi expono; Multi enini sunt vocati, pau-. ci vero electi → Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.6 (PL 38:368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
95.7PL 38:368
Quid est vestis nuptialis? Quæramus illam in Litteris sanctis. Quid est vestis nuptialis? Sine dubio aliquid est quod mali et boni commune non babent: hoc inveniamus, et invenimus vestem nuptialem. Iii donis Dei quid cst quod commune non babent boni ct mali? Quod homines sumus et pecora non sumus, Dei doRum est: sed commune hoc cum bonis et malis. Quod nobis lux de cœlo oritur, de nube pluiviæ descendunt, fontes IIlanant, agri fructificant, dona sunt, sed bonis malisque communinia. Intremus ad nuptias; foris alios relinquamus, qui non vcnerunt vocati. Ipsos convivas, id cst, Chi istianos considercmus. Baptismus donum Dei est, habent illum boni ct mali. Altaris Sacramenta simul accipiunt boni et mali. Prophetavit Saul iniquus, et viro sancto atque justissimo infestus; dum eum persequeretur prophetavit (I Reg. xix). Numquid dicuntur credere soli boni? Et dæmones credunt, et contremi cunt. Quid facio? Excussi omnia, et ad vestem illam nondurn perveni. Involucrum meum explicavi, omnia vel pene omnia consideravi, ad vestem illam nondum perveni. Quodam loco Paulus apostolus attulit milii magnum involucrum maguarum rerum; exposuit ante me, et dixi ei, Ostende mihi si forte hic illam vestem nurptialem reprrisli. Coepit excutere singula, et dicere: Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, si habeam omnem scientiam, et prophetiam, ci omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam; si distribuero omnia mea pauperibus, et tradam corpus meum ut ardeam. Magnæ vestes: nondum tamen est illa nuptialis. Jam profer nobis nuptialem vestem. Quid nos, Apostole, suspendis? Prophetia forte Dci donum esi, quod non habent boni et mali, Si charitatem, inquit v non habeam, nihil sum, nihil mihi prodest. Ecce vestis nuptialis: induite vos, o convivæ, at securi discumbatis. Nolile dicere: Ad istam vestem habendam pauperes sumus. Vestite, et vestimini. Hiems est:: vestite nndos: nudus est Christus; et quicumque non hahetis vestem nuptialem, dabit illam. Ad illum currite, ipsum rogate: novit sanctificare fideles suos, novit vestire nudos suos. Ut possitis vestem habentes nuptialem non timere tenebras exteriores, vincula membrorum et mannum et pedum; non deficiant opera. Si deficiunt, ligatis manibus quid facturus est? ligatis pedibus quo fugiturus cst? Illam teneatis vestem nuptialem, induimini ipsam, et scruri discumbite, quando venit inspicere. Dies judicii aderit: magnutn spatium modo largitur, qui nudas crat aliquando vestiatur.
What is the wedding garment? Let us look for it in the holy writings. What is the wedding garment? Without doubt it is something that the bad and the good do not have in common: let us find this, and we have found the wedding garment. Among God’s gifts, what is it that good and bad do not have in common? That we are human and not cattle is God’s gift; but it is common to good and bad. That light rises for us from heaven, that rains come down from the cloud, that springs flow, that fields bear fruit: these are gifts, but common to good and bad. Let us go in to the wedding; let us leave outside the others, who did not come when called. Let us consider the guests themselves, that is, Christians. Baptism is God’s gift; good and bad have it. The sacraments of the altar good and bad alike receive. Saul the wicked prophesied, hostile to a holy and most righteous man; while he was persecuting him he prophesied. Are only the good said to believe? “The demons also believe, and tremble.” What shall I do? I have shaken out everything, and I have not yet come to that garment. I have unrolled my bundle, I have considered everything or almost everything, and I have not yet come to that garment. In a certain place the apostle Paul brought me a great bundle of great things; he spread it out before me, and I said to him, “Show me whether perhaps you have found that wedding garment here.” He began to shake out the items one by one and to say: “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if I have all knowledge and prophecy and all faith, so as to move mountains; if I give away all my goods to the poor and hand over my body to be burned.” Great garments; yet that is not yet the wedding garment. Now bring out the wedding garment for us. Why do you keep us in suspense, apostle? Perhaps prophecy is God’s gift which good and bad do not both have. “If I have not love,” he says, “I am nothing; it profits me nothing.” See the wedding garment: put it on, guests, so that you may recline in safety. Do not say, “We are too poor to have that garment.” Clothe others, and be clothed. It is winter: clothe the naked. Christ is naked; and to all of you who do not have the wedding garment he will give it. Run to him, ask him: he knows how to sanctify his faithful, he knows how to clothe his naked ones. So that, having the wedding garment, you may not fear the outer darkness, the bonds on your limbs, hands and feet: let works not fail. If they fail, what will he do with his hands bound? Where will he flee with his feet bound? Hold on to that wedding garment, put it on, and recline in safety when he comes to look. The day of judgment will come: now he grants a long space, so that whoever was once naked may be clothed.
Matt 5:45 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Sam 19:23–24 (allusion, high confidence) · Jas 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:1–3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:36 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 22:13 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The wedding garment is not any gift shared by good and bad, such as baptism, the eucharist, prophecy, or faith, but love, which is put on by clothing Christ in the naked.
- Quotations: Jas 2:19; 1 Cor 13:1–3; Saul prophesying, 1 Sam 19:23–24; light and rain for good and bad, Matt 5:45; Christ naked in the poor, Matt 25:36. Baptism and the eucharist shared by good and bad: a point aimed at the Donatists, translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray mark; joined words): Quid est vestis uuptialis? Quæramus illam in Litteris sanctis I. → Quid est vestis nuptialis? Quæramus illam in Litteris sanctis.; hoc inveniamus, et inenimus vestem nuptialem → hoc inveniamus, et invenimus vestem nuptialem; Altaris Sacramenta sunu! accipiunt → Altaris Sacramenta simul accipiunt; Prophetavit Sauliniquus → Prophetavit Saul iniquus; dabit iIlam → dabit illam.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 95.7 (PL 38:368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-95-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-95-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
Chapter 96
96.1PL 38:368–369
Durum videtur ct grave quod Dominus imperavit, ut si quis eum vult sequi, abneget se ipsum. Sed non est durum nec grave quod ille imperat, qui adjuvat ut fiat quod imperat. Nam et illud verum est quod ei dicitur in Psalmo: Propter verba labiorum tuorum ego custodivi vias duras. Et illud verum est quod ipse dixit: Jugum meum lene est, et onus meum leve eat. Quidquid enim durum est in præceptis, ut sit lene, charitas facit. Novi mus quanta ipse amor faciat. Plerumque etiani ipse amor reprobus atque lascivus est: quanta homines dura perpessi sunt, quanta indigna et intolerabilia pertulerunt, ut pervenirent ad id quod amaverunt; sive sit amator pecuniæ, qui vocatur avarus; sive sit honoris amator, qui vocatur ambitiosus; sive sit corporum pulchrorum amator, qui vocatur lascivus? Et quis posset cnumerarc omnes amores? Considerate tamen, quantum laborent omnes amatores, nec sentiunt quod laborant: ct tunc ab eis plus laboratur, quando a labore quisque prohibetur. Cum ergo tales sint homines plures, quales sunt amores, nihilque aliud curæ esse debeat quomodo vivatur, nisi ut quod amandum est eligatur; quid miraris, si ille qui diligit Christum, et qui vult sequi Christum, amando negat se ipsum? Si enim perit homo amando se, profecto invenitur negando se.
It seems hard and heavy, what the Lord commanded: that if anyone wants to follow him, he must deny himself. But what he commands is not hard or heavy, since he helps us do what he commands. For both are true: what is said to him in the Psalm, “Because of the words of your lips I have kept hard ways”; and what he himself said, “My yoke is gentle and my burden light.” For whatever is hard in the commandments, love makes light. We know how much love itself can do. Often love is even reprobate and lustful: how many hard things have people endured, how many shameful and unbearable things have they suffered, to reach what they loved, whether a lover of money, who is called greedy; or a lover of honor, who is called ambitious; or a lover of beautiful bodies, who is called lustful? And who could count all the loves? Yet consider how much all lovers labor, and they do not feel that they labor; and they labor the more when anyone is kept from the labor. Since, then, people are for the most part such as their loves are, and nothing else ought to concern us about how we live except that we choose what is to be loved, why are you surprised if he who loves Christ and wants to follow Christ denies himself by loving? For if a man is lost by loving himself, surely he is found by denying himself.
Mark 8:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 17:4 (16:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:25 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ’s command to deny oneself is not hard, because love makes every burden light, as even sinful loves show; one who loves Christ finds himself by denying himself.
- The reading is Mark 8:34. Quotations: Ps 17:4 (16:4 Vulg.); Matt 11:30; Matt 16:25 (losing and finding).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): ut sit leae, charitas facit → ut sit lene, charitas facit; Si euim per it homo amando se → Si enim perit homo amando se.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.1 (PL 38:368–369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.2PL 38:369
Prima hominis perditio, fuit amor sui. Si enim se non amaret, et Deum sihi præponeret, Deo esse scm - per subditus vellet: non autem converteretur ad negligendam voluntatem illius, et faciendam voluntatem saam. Hoc est enim amare se, velle lacere voluntatem suam. Praepone his voluntatem Dei: disce amare te, non amando te. Nam ut sciatis vitium esse se amare, sic Apostolus dicit: Erunt enim homines se ipsos amantes. Et numquid qui amal se, fidit in se? incipit enim deserto Deo amare se, et ad ea diligenda quæ sunt extra se, pellitur a se: usque adeo ut cum dixisset idem Apostolus, Erunt homines seipsos amantes, continuo sobjiceret, amatores pecuniae. Jam vides quia foris es. Amare te coepisti: sta in te, si potes. Quid is foras? Numquid pecunia dives factus es, amator pecuniæ? Coepisti diligere qnod est extra te, perdidisti te. Cum ergo pergit amor hominis etiam a se ipso ad ca quæ foris sunt, incipit cum vanis evanescere, et vires suas quodam modo prodigus erogare. Exinanitur, effunditur, inops redditur, porcos pascit: et bhorans in pastione porcorum, aliquando recordatur ct dicit, Quanti mercenarii patris mei panem manducant, et ego fame hic pereo? Sed hoc quando dicit, quid narratum est de ipso filio, qui omnia effudit in meretricibus, qui habere voluit in potestate quoe bene illi apud patrem servabantur; habere illa voluit in arbitrio suo,effudit ea, factus est inops? quid de illo dicitur? Et reversus ad semetipsum. Si reversus est ad se, exierat a se. Quia ceciderat a se, et exierat a se, redit prins ad se, ut redeat in illo unde ceciderat a se. Sicut enim cadendo a se, remansit in se: sic redeundo ad se, non debet remanerc in se, ne iterum exeat a se. Reversus ad semetipsum, ut non remaneret in semetipso, quid dixit? Surgam, et ibo ad patrem meum. Ecce unde ceciderat a se, ceciderat a patre suo: cecidcrat a se, ad ea quæ foris sunt exiit a se. Redit ad se, et pergit ad patrem, ubi tutissime servet se. Si ergo cxicrat a se, eta quo exierat; rcdeundo ad se, ut cat ad patrem, neget se. Quid est, neget se? Non præsumat de se, sentiat se hominem, et respiciat dictum propheticum: Maledictus omnis, qui spem suam ponit in homine. Subducat se sibi, sed non dcorsum versus. Subducat se sibi, ut hæreat Deo. Quidquid boni habet, iili trihuat a quo factus est: quidquid mali habet, ipse sibi fecit. Deus quod in illo malum est, non fecit: perdat quod fecit, qui inde defecit. Abneget, inquit, se, et tollat crucem suam, et sequatur me.
The first ruin of man was love of himself. For if he had not loved himself, and had put God before himself, he would have wished always to be subject to God; he would not have turned to neglect God’s will and do his own. For this is what it is to love oneself: to wish to do one’s own will. Put God’s will before these: learn to love yourself by not loving yourself. For so that you may know that loving oneself is a vice, the apostle says: “For men will be lovers of themselves.” And does he who loves himself trust in himself? He begins, having deserted God, to love himself; and he is driven out of himself to love the things that are outside himself: so much so that the same apostle, having said, “Men will be lovers of themselves,” added at once, “lovers of money.” Now you see that you are outside. You began to love yourself: stand in yourself, if you can. Why do you go outside? Have you been made rich by money, lover of money? You began to love what is outside you; you have lost yourself. So when a man’s love goes out even from himself to the things outside, it begins to vanish with vain things and, like a prodigal, to squander its strength. It is emptied, poured out, made destitute; it feeds pigs; and laboring at feeding pigs, it at last remembers and says, “How many hired men of my father eat bread, and I am perishing here of hunger?” But when he says this, what is told of that son who poured out everything on harlots, who wanted to have in his own power what was kept safe for him with his father, wanted to have it at his own disposal, poured it out, and became destitute? What is said of him? “And he came back to himself.” If he came back to himself, he had gone out from himself. Because he had fallen from himself and gone out from himself, he first returns to himself, so as to return to him from whom he had fallen in falling from himself. For as in falling from himself he remained in himself, so in returning to himself he must not remain in himself, lest he go out from himself again. Having come back to himself, so as not to remain in himself, what did he say? “I will arise and go to my father.” See whence he had fallen from himself: he had fallen from his father. He had fallen from himself; he had gone out from himself to the things outside. He returns to himself and goes on to his father, where he may keep himself most safely. If, then, he had gone out from himself, he had also gone out from him from whom he had gone out; in returning to himself so as to go to his father, let him deny himself. What does “deny himself” mean? Let him not presume on himself; let him know he is a man, and look at the prophetic saying: “Cursed is everyone who puts his hope in man.” Let him withdraw himself from himself, but not downward. Let him withdraw himself from himself so as to cling to God. Whatever good he has, let him ascribe it to him by whom he was made; whatever evil he has, he made for himself. God did not make what is evil in him: let him destroy what he himself made, he who fell away from it. “Let him deny himself,” he says, “and take up his cross, and follow me.”
2 Tim 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:13–18 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 17:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 8:34 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Self-love was man’s first ruin and drives him out to love external things, like the prodigal son; to return he must come back to himself and go on to the Father, denying himself and trusting God, not man.
- The opening words “Amor sui, prima hominis perditio” are Migne’s marginal heading, repeated at once by Augustine’s own sentence; the heading is removed. Quotations: 2 Tim 3:2; Luke 15:13–18; Jer 17:5; Mark 8:34. The sentence “Si ergo exierat a se, et a quo exierat” is obscure in the digital text; translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slip; OCR slips): Amor sui, prima hommis perditio, Prima hominis perditio, fuit amor stri. → Prima hominis perditio, fuit amor sui.; Nam ut sciatis vitium esse se ainarc → Nam ut sciatis vitium esse se amare; Erunt enim homines se ipsos amanlea. → Erunt enim homines se ipsos amantes.; sentiat sr hominem → sentiat se hominem.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.2 (PL 38:369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.3PL 38:369
Quo sequendus est Dominus? Quo iit, novimus: eamdem solemnitatem ante dies paucissimos celebravimus. Resurrexit enim, et ascendit in coelum: illo sequendus est. Plane desperandum non est, quia ipsc promisit, non quia homo aliquid potest. Longe a nobis crat coelum antequam caput nostrum iisset in caelum. Jam quare desperemus, si membra illius capitis sumus? Illo ergo sequendus est. Et quis nolit eum scqui ad talem sedem? Maxime quia inultum timoribus et doloribus laboratur in terra. Quis nolit illo sequi Christum, ubi summa est felicitas, summa pax, perpetua securitas? Bonum est illo eum sequi: sed videndum est qua. Etenim verba ista Dominus Jesus non tunc dicebat, quando a mortuis jam resurrexerat. Nondum erat passus, venturus erat ad crucem, venturus ad cxhonorationem, ad contumelias, ad flagella, ad spinas, ac vulnera, ad insultationes, opprobria, mortem. Quasi exasperata est via: pigrum te facit: non vis sequi. Sequerc. Asperatum est quod sibi homo fecit, sed contritum est quod Christus redeundo calcavit. Nam quis non velit ire ad exaltationem? Omnes delectat celsitudo: sed humilitas gradus cst. Quid tendis pedem ultra te? Cadere vis, non ascendere. A gradu incipc, et ascendisti. Istum gradum humilitatis nolebant attendere duo illi discipuli, qui dicebant: Domine, jube ut unus nostrum in regno tuo sedeat ad dexteram tuam, et alius ad sinistram tuam. Sublimitatem quarebant, gradum non videbant. Dominus autem ostendit gradum. Quid enim respondit? Potestis bibere calicem quem ego bibiturus sum? Qui quæritis apicem sublimitatis, potestis bibere calicem humilitatis? Ideo non utcumque ait, Abneget seipsum, et sequatur me; sed addidit, Tollat crucem suam, et sequatur me.
Where is the Lord to be followed? We know where he went: we celebrated that very feast a very few days ago. For he rose again and ascended into heaven: there he is to be followed. Plainly we must not despair, because he himself promised, not because man can do anything. Heaven was far from us before our head had gone into heaven. Why should we despair now, if we are members of that head? There, then, he is to be followed. And who would not want to follow him to such a seat? Above all since on earth there is much toil with fears and sorrows. Who would not want to follow Christ there, where there is the highest happiness, the highest peace, everlasting security? It is good to follow him there; but we must see by what road. For the Lord Jesus did not say these words when he had already risen from the dead. He had not yet suffered; he was to come to the cross, to come to dishonor, to insults, to scourges, to thorns and wounds, to mockery, reproaches, death. The road seems rough; it makes you slow; you do not want to follow. Follow. What man made for himself is rough; but what Christ trod on his way back has been worn smooth. For who would not want to go to exaltation? Height delights everyone: but humility is the step. Why stretch your foot beyond yourself? You want to fall, not to climb. Begin with the step, and you have climbed. That step of humility those two disciples would not notice who said, “Lord, command that one of us may sit at your right hand in your kingdom, and the other at your left.” They looked for the height; they did not see the step. But the Lord showed them the step. For what did he answer? “Can you drink the cup that I am about to drink?” You who seek the summit of exaltation, can you drink the cup of humility? So he did not say merely, “Let him deny himself and follow me,” but added, “Let him take up his cross and follow me.”
Acts 1:9–11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 20:21–22 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:37–38 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mark 8:34 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is to be followed into heaven, where he ascended, but by the road of his cross; humility is the step, as he told the sons of Zebedee who wanted the highest seats.
- The opening words “Quo sequendus Christus et qua via” (“Where Christ is to be followed, and by what road”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. The feast celebrated a few days before is the Ascension. Quotations: Matt 20:21–22 (Mark 10:37–38); Mark 8:34.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips): Quo sequendus Christus et qua via. Quo sequendus → Quo sequendus; ante dies p tucissimos celebravimus. Hesurrexit enim → ante dies paucissimos celebravimus. Resurrexit enim; Quas exasperata est via: pigrum tc facit: non vissequi. → Quasi exasperata est via: pigrum te facit: non vis sequi..
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.3 (PL 38:369; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.4PL 38:369–370
Quid est, Tollat crucem suam? Ferat quidquid molestum est: sic mc scquatur. Cum enim cæperit me moribus ct præceptis meis sequi, multos habebit contradictores, multos habebit prohibitores, multos habebit dissuasores, et hoc de ipsis quasi comitibus Christi. Cum Christo ambulabant, qui cæcos clamare prohibebant. Sivc ergo minas, sive blandi menia, sive quaslibet prohibitiones, si sequi vis, in crucem verte; tolera, porta, noli succumbere. V!dentur his verbis Domini exhortata martyria. Si persecutio est, nonne pro Christo debent cuncta contemni? Amatur mundus: sed præponatur a quo factus est mundus. Magnus est mundus: sed major cst a quo factus est mundus. Pulcher est mundus: sed pulchrior est a quo factus cst mundus. Blandus est mundus: sed suavior est a quo factus est mundus. Malus est mundus: et bonus est a quo factus est mundus. Quomodo potero absolvere et explicare quod dixi? Adjuvet Deus. Quid enim dixi? quid laudastis? Ecce quaestio est, et tamen jam laudastis. Quomodo malus est mundus, si bonus est a quo factus est mundus? Nonne Deus fecit omnia, et ecce bona valde? Nonne per singula testatur Scriptura quod bona fecerit Deus, dicendo, Et vidit Deus quia bonum est? Et universa in fine ita conclusit quemadmodum fecit Deus omnia, et ecce bona valde (Gen. i).
What does “let him take up his cross” mean? Let him bear whatever is troublesome: so let him follow me. For when he begins to follow me in my way of life and my commandments, he will have many to oppose him, many to forbid him, many to dissuade him, and that from among Christ’s companions, as it were. Those who were forbidding the blind men to cry out were walking with Christ. So whether threats or flatteries or any prohibitions whatever, if you want to follow, turn them into a cross; endure, carry, do not give way. In these words of the Lord martyrdoms seem to be encouraged. If there is persecution, should not everything be despised for Christ? The world is loved; but let him by whom the world was made be put first. The world is great; but greater is he by whom the world was made. The world is beautiful; but more beautiful is he by whom the world was made. The world is alluring; but sweeter is he by whom the world was made. The world is evil, and good is he by whom the world was made. How shall I be able to resolve and explain what I have said? May God help. For what did I say? What did you applaud? See, there is a question, and yet you have already applauded. How is the world evil, if he by whom the world was made is good? Did not God make all things, and behold, very good? Does not Scripture testify one by one that God made good things, by saying, “And God saw that it was good”? And at the end it concluded all of them, how God made all things, and behold, very good.
Mark 8:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 20:31 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Taking up the cross means bearing all opposition, even from fellow Christians, and preferring the Creator to the world; Augustine then raises the question how the world is evil if its maker is good.
- The blind men silenced by the crowd: Matt 20:31 (Mark 10:48). God saw that it was good: Gen 1:10–31.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Quid est, Tollat crucem suam? h'erat quidquid → Quid est, Tollat crucem suam? Ferat quidquid; si sequi vis, iit crucem verte → si sequi vis, in crucem verte; Quomodo malus rst mundus → Quomodo malus est mundus.
Topics: Martyrdom, Persecution
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.4 (PL 38:369–370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.5PL 38:370
Quomodo ergo malus est mundus, et honus est a quo factus est mundus? quomodo? Quoniam mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognovit. Mundus per eum factus est, cœlum et terra, et omnia quæ in eis sunt: mundus eum non cognovit, amatores mundi; amatores mundi, ct contemptores Dci: iste mundus eum non cognovit. Sic ergo malus est mundus, quia mali sunt qui Deo præferunt mundum. Et bonus est qui fecit mundum, cœlum et terram et mare, et ipsos qui amant mundum. Solum enim quod amant mundum et non amant Dcum, in illis non ipse fecit. Ipsosautem, quod ad naturam pertinet, ipse fecit: quod ad culpam pertinet, non ipse fecit. Hoc est quod paulo ante dixi, Deleat homo quod fecit, et placebit ei qui cum fecit.
How, then, is the world evil, and good he by whom the world was made? How? Because “the world was made through him, and the world did not know him.” The world was made through him: heaven and earth and all that is in them. The world did not know him: the lovers of the world; lovers of the world and despisers of God: this world did not know him. So the world is evil in this way, because those are evil who prefer the world to God. And good is he who made the world, heaven and earth and sea, and those very people who love the world. For only the fact that they love the world and do not love God he did not make in them. But themselves, as far as nature is concerned, he made; as far as fault is concerned, he did not make. This is what I said a little earlier: let a man destroy what he made, and he will please him who made him.
John 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The world is evil only in its lovers who prefer it to God; God made their nature, not their fault.
- Quotation: John 1:10.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): et mundus cum non cognovit → et mundus eum non cognovit; Et bonus est qui iecit mundum → Et bonus est qui fecit mundum.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.5 (PL 38:370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.6PL 38:370
Nam est et mundus bonus in ipsis hominibus; sed ex malo factus. Totum enim mundum, si homines ponas mundum, excepto quod dicimus mundum coelum et terram, et omnia qune in eis sunt; si homines dicas mundum, totum mundum malum fecit, qui primo peccavit. Omnis massa in radice vitiata est. Bonum hominem fecit Deus: sic habet Scriptura, Fecit Deus hominem rectum, et ipsi homines adinvenerunt cogitationes multas. A multis curre ad unum, dispersa collige in unum: conflue, munitus esto, mane apud unum; noli ire in multa. Ibi est bcatitudo. Sed defluximus, in perditionem perreximus: omnes cum peccato nati sumus, et ad id quod nati sumus, male vivendo et nos addidimus, et totus mundus factus est malus. Christus autem venit, et elegit quod fecit, non quod invenit: nam omnes malos invenit, et gratia sua bonos fecit. Et factus est alter mundus: et mundum persequitur mundus.
For there is also a good world in men themselves; but it was made out of an evil one. For the whole world (if you take men as the world, apart from what we call the world, heaven and earth and all that is in them), if you call men the world, the whole world was made evil by the one who first sinned. The whole lump was corrupted at the root. God made man good; so Scripture has it: “God made man upright, and men themselves have sought out many thoughts.” From the many run to the one; gather what is scattered into one; flow together, be fortified, stay with the one; do not go off into the many. There is blessedness. But we flowed away, we set out for perdition: we were all born with sin, and to what we were born with we added by living badly, and the whole world was made evil. But Christ came, and chose what he made, not what he found: for he found all evil, and by his grace made them good. And another world was made: and the world persecutes the world.
Eccl 7:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Mankind, the world made evil by Adam’s sin and our own, was remade good by Christ’s grace into another world, which the evil world persecutes.
- Quotation: Eccl 7:29 (Augustine’s Latin, “many thoughts”). “The whole lump” (massa) echoes Rom 9:21; 11:16, a recurring term of Augustine’s for fallen humanity.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Nain est et mundus bonus → Nam est et mundus bonus; et totus mundos factus est malus → et totus mundus factus est malus; et elegit quod frcit, non quod invenit → et elegit quod fecit, non quod invenit.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.6 (PL 38:370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.7PL 38:370
Quis est mundus qui persequitur? De quo nobis dicitur, Nolite diligere mundum, et ea quæ in mundo sunt. Quisquis dilexerit mundum, non eat charitas Patris in illo. Quia omnia quas in mundo sunt concupiscentia carnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio sæculi, quæ non eat a Patre, sed ex mundo est. Et mundus transit, et concupiscentia ejus. Qui autem perficit voluntatem Dci, manet in æternum, sicut et Deus manet in æternum. Ecce ambos mundus dixi, ct persequentem, et quem persequitur. Quis cst mundus persequens? Omnia qucc in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio sacculi, quæ non est a Patre, sed ex mundo est: et mundus transit. Ecce iste est mundus persequens. Quis est mundus quem persequitur! Quisquis fecerit voluntatem Dei, manet in æternum, sicut et Deus manet in æternum.
Which is the world that persecutes? That of which it is said to us: “Do not love the world or the things in the world. Whoever loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world is the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the ambition of the age, which is not from the Father but from the world. And the world passes away, and its lust; but whoever does the will of God abides forever, as God also abides forever.” See, I have named both “world,” the one that persecutes and the one it persecutes. Which is the persecuting world? “All that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the ambition of the age, which is not from the Father but from the world; and the world passes away.” See, that is the persecuting world. Which is the world it persecutes? “Whoever does the will of God abides forever, as God also abides forever.”
1 John 2:15–17 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The persecuting world is the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and worldly ambition; the persecuted world is those who do God’s will and abide forever.
- Quotation: 1 John 2:15–17, with the addition “as God also abides forever” found in some Latin texts.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (joined words, OCR slip): Ecccambos mundus dixi → Ecce ambos mundus dixi.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.7 (PL 38:370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.8PL 38:370
Sed ecce, ille qui persequitur, mundus vocatur: probemus, si et ille qui persecutionem patitur, mundus vocatur. An vero surdus es adversus vocem Christi dicentis, vel potius Scripturæ sanctæ attestantis, Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi? Si odit vos mundus, ait, scitote quia me prius odio habuit. Ecce odit mundus Quem, nisi mundum? Quem mundum? Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi. Persequitur mundus damnatus: persecutionem patitur mundus reconciliatus. Mundus damnatus, quidquid praeter Ecclesiam: mundus reconciliatus, Ecclesia. Non enim venit Filius hominis, ait, ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum.
But see, the one that persecutes is called the world; let us prove whether the one that suffers persecution is also called the world. Or are you deaf to the voice of Christ saying, or rather of holy Scripture testifying, “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself”? “If the world hates you,” he says, “know that it hated me first.” See, the world hates. Whom, if not the world? Which world? “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself.” The condemned world persecutes; the reconciled world suffers persecution. The condemned world is whatever is outside the church; the reconciled world is the church. “For the Son of Man did not come,” he says, “to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him.”
2 Cor 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:17 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture also calls the persecuted church “the world,” the world God reconciled to himself in Christ, while the condemned world outside the church persecutes it.
- The opening words “Mundus in Scripturis duplex, redemptus et damnatus” (“The world in Scripture is twofold, redeemed and condemned”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: 2 Cor 5:19; John 15:18; John 3:17 (Augustine’s form “Son of Man”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Mundus in Scripturis duplex, redemptus et damnatus. Sed ecce → Sed ecce.
Topics: Persecution
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.8 (PL 38:370; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
96.9PL 38:370–371
Sed in hoc mundo sancto, bono, reconciliato, salvato; imo salvando, nunc autem spe salvato, Spe enim salvi facti sumus ( Rom. VIII, 24): in hoc ergo mundo, boc est Ecclesia, quæ tota sequitur Christum, universaliter dixit, Qui vult me sequi, abneget semetipsum. Non enim hoc virgines debent audire, et maritatæ non debent, aut vidulæ debent, et nuptæ non debent: aut monaclii debent, et conjugati uon debent; aut clerici debent, et laici non debent: sed universa Ecclesia, universum corpus, cuncta membra per oflicia propria distincta et distributa, sequantur Cbristum. Tota sequatur ipsa unica, scquatur columba. sequatur sponsa, sequatur redempta et dotata sanguine sponsi. Habet ibi locum suum integritas virginalis; habet ibi locum suum con tinentia vidualis; habet ibi locurn suum pudicitia conjugalis: non ibi habet locum suum adulterium; non ibi habet locum suum illicita et punienda Iascivia. Ista autem membra quæ habent ibi locum suum in genere suo, et in loco suo, ct in suo modo, sequantur Christum; abnegent se, id cst non præsumant de se; tollant crucem suam, id est, tolerent in muodo pro Christo quidquid intulerit mundus. Ament eum qui solus non decipit, qui solus non fallitur, solus non fallit: ament eum, quia verum est quod promittit. Sed quia non modo dat, titubat fides. Dura, persevera, tolcra, porta dilationem, et tulisti cruccm. Non dicat virgo: Sola ibi ero. Non enim sola ibi erit Maria, sed crit ibi et Anna vidua. Non dicat nupta: Vidua ibi erit, non ego. Non enim erit ibi Anna, et non ibi erit Susanna. Sed plane inde se probent qui ibi futuri sunt, at qui habent hic inferiorem locum, non invideant, sed diligant in aliis meliorem locum. Etenim, verbi gratia, fratres mei, ut advertatis: conjugalem vitam quisque elegit, continentem vitam quisque elegit; si ille qui elegit vitam conjugalem, concupiverit adulteria, retro respexit; illud concupivit quod illicitum est Qui vero a continentia ad nuptias postea redire voluerit, retro respexit: licitum clegit, et retro respexit. Ergo damnandæ sunt nuptiæ? Nou. Non sunt damnandæ nuptiæ: sed ille qui eas elegit, quo accesserat vide. Jam ante ierat. Quando vivebat lascive adolescens, nuptiæ ante illum erant; ad eas se tendebat: cum vero elegit continentiam, nuptiæ post illum suut. Memores estote, ait Dominus, uxoris Lot ( Luc. XVII, 32 ). Uxor Lot retro respiciendo remansit ( Gen. XIX, 26 ). Quisque ergo quo po:uit pervenire, inde timeat retro respicere: et ambulet in via, sequatur Christum: qune retro oblitus, in ca quæ ante sunt extentus, secundum intentionem intus sequatur ad palmam vocationis Dei in Christo Jesu ( Philipp. III, 13,14). Conjugati præponant sibi innuptos; fateantur cos esse meliores: in eis diligant quod ipsi non habent; et in illis Christum ament.
But in this holy, good, reconciled, saved world; rather, to be saved, but now saved in hope (“for in hope we have been saved”): in this world, then, that is, the church, which follows Christ as a whole, he said universally, “Whoever wants to follow me, let him deny himself.” For it is not that virgins ought to hear this and married women not; or widows ought and wives not; or monks ought and the married not; or clergy ought and laity not: but let the whole church, the whole body, all the members, distinguished and distributed by their proper offices, follow Christ. Let her follow as a whole, the only one; let the dove follow, let the bride follow, redeemed and endowed with the bridegroom’s blood. Virginal integrity has its place there; widowed continence has its place there; married chastity has its place there: adultery has no place there; unlawful and punishable lust has no place there. But let these members that have their place there, each in its kind, its place, and its measure, follow Christ: let them deny themselves, that is, not presume on themselves; let them take up their cross, that is, endure in the world for Christ whatever the world inflicts. Let them love him who alone does not deceive, who alone is not deceived and alone does not deceive: let them love him, because what he promises is true. But because he does not give it now, faith wavers. Hold out, persevere, endure, bear the delay, and you have taken up the cross. Let the virgin not say, “I alone shall be there.” For not Mary alone will be there; Anna the widow will be there too. Let the married woman not say, “The widow will be there, not I.” For it is not that Anna will be there and Susanna will not. But let those who will be there prove themselves in this: that those who have a lower place here do not envy, but love in others the better place. For example, my brothers, so that you may take note: one has chosen married life, one has chosen a life of continence. If the one who chose married life lusts after adulteries, he has looked back: he has lusted after what is unlawful. But whoever wants afterward to go back from continence to marriage has looked back: he has chosen what is lawful, and yet he has looked back. Is marriage, then, to be condemned? No. Marriage is not to be condemned; but see where he had come who chose it. He had already gone on ahead. When he lived lustfully as a youth, marriage was ahead of him; he was stretching toward it; but when he chose continence, marriage is behind him. “Remember,” says the Lord, “Lot’s wife.” Lot’s wife, by looking back, stayed where she was. So let each one fear to look back from where he has been able to reach; and let him walk on the road, let him follow Christ: “forgetting what lies behind, and stretched out toward what lies ahead,” let him press on inwardly in purpose toward the prize of God’s calling in Christ Jesus. Let the married put the unmarried before themselves; let them confess that they are better; let them love in them what they themselves do not have; and in them let them love Christ.
Rom 8:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 8:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 2:36–38 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 17:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 19:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 3:13–14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ’s call to self-denial is for the whole church, virgins, widows, and married alike, each in its place; to turn from a chosen continence back to marriage, though lawful, is looking back like Lot’s wife.
- Migne’s paragraph 10 begins inside this staged section at “Let the virgin not say”; his heading “10. The various ranks of those who follow Christ, and what it is for them to look back” is left in the digital text and removed by a correction. Quotations: Rom 8:24; Mark 8:34; Luke 17:32; Gen 19:26; Phil 3:13–14. Mary the virgin, Anna the widow (Luke 2:36–38), and Susanna the wife (Sus 1–64, an extrabiblical text) stand for the three states. Passages on marriage and continence translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's paragraph number and marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slips): iO. Varii gradus sequentium Christum, quidve in illis sit retro respicere. Non dicat virgo → Non dicat virgo; Sed ili hoc mundo sancto → Sed in hoc mundo sancto; concupiverit adulteria, Tetro respexit; itlud concupivit quod illicitum esu → concupiverit adulteria, retro respexit; illud concupivit quod illicitum est; sed ille qui ca3 elegit → sed ille qui eas elegit.
Extrabiblical texts: Sus (Susanna [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Marriage
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 96.9 (PL 38:370–371; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/95-1/#p-96-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-96-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).