Tractates on the Gospel of John 19.15–19.20
Latin text: Migne, PL 35 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 7 (1888).
Chapter 19
19.15PL 35:1551–1553
Noli itaque, Domine, tacere de resurrectione carnis; ne non eam credant homines, et remaneamus nos argumentatores, non prædicatores. Ergo sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio habere vitam in semetipso. Intelligant qui audiunt, credant ut intelligant, obediant ut vivant. Audiant adhuc aliud, ne hic finitam esse resurrectionem putent. Et dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere. Quis? Pater. Cui dedit? Filio. Cui enim dedit habere vitam in semetipso, po testatem dedit ei et judicium facere. Quia filius homi nis est. Iste enim Christus, et Filius Dei ct filius ho minis est. In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum; hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Ecce quomodo dedit ei vitam habere in semetipso. Sed quia Verbum caro factum est, et habita vit in nobis, ex virgine Maria homo factus, filius hominis est. Proinde quia filius hominis est, quid accepit? Potestatem et judicium fa cere. Quod judicium? In fine sæculi: et ibi erit re surrectio mortuorum, sed corporum. Animas ergo suscitat Deus, per Christum Filium Dei: corpora sus citat Deus, per eumdem Christum filium hominis. Dedit ei potestatem. Hanc potestatem non haberet nisi acciperet, et esset homo sine potestate. Sed ipse est filius hominis, qui et Filius Dei. Haerendo enim ad unitatem personæ filius hominis Filio Dei, facta est una persona, eademque Filius Dei, quæ et filius ho minis. Quid autem propter quid habeat, dignoscen dum est. Filius hominis habet animam, habet corpus. Filius Dei, quod est Verbum Dei, habet hominem, tanquam anima corpus. Sicut anima habens corpus, non facit duas personas, sed unum hominem; sic Verbum habens hominem, non facit duas personas, sed unum Christum. Quid est homo? Anima rationa lis habens corpus. Quid est Christus? Verbum Dei habens hominem. Video de quibus rebus loquar, et quis loquar, et quibus loquar.
Do not, then, Lord, be silent about the resurrection of the flesh, lest people not believe it, and we remain arguers, not preachers. “So, as the Father has life in himself, so he has given to the Son also to have life in himself.” Let those who hear understand; let them believe in order to understand; let them obey in order to live. Let them hear yet something more, lest they think the resurrection ends here. “And he has given him power to execute judgment also.” Who? The Father. To whom did he give it? To the Son. For to the one to whom he gave to have life in himself, he gave power to execute judgment also. “Because he is the son of man.” For this Christ is both Son of God and son of man. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; he was in the beginning with God.” See how he gave him to have life in himself. But because “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us,” having been made man from the Virgin Mary, he is the son of man. Therefore, because he is the son of man, what did he receive? Power to execute judgment also. What judgment? At the end of the world; and there will be the resurrection of the dead, but of bodies. God, then, raises souls through Christ the Son of God; God raises bodies through the same Christ, the son of man. “He has given him power.” He would not have this power unless he received it, and he would be a man without power. But he who is the son of man is himself also the Son of God. For by the son of man cleaving to the Son of God in unity of person, one person was made, the same who is Son of God and son of man. But what he has, and on account of what, must be discerned. The son of man has a soul, has a body. The Son of God, who is the Word of God, has the man, as the soul has the body. Just as the soul having a body does not make two persons, but one man, so the Word having the man does not make two persons, but one Christ. What is man? A rational soul having a body. What is Christ? The Word of God having man. I see what things I am speaking of, and who I am that speak, and to whom I speak.
John 5:26 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Son of God raises souls; as son of man he received power to judge and will raise bodies; the Word having man is one Christ, as soul and body are one man.
- John 1:1–2 and 1:14 are quoted. The passage is a statement of the unity of Christ's person.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): hn. bet → habet; Dcus erat → Deus erat; Proindc → Proinde; suscitat Ocus, per Christuin → suscitat Deus, per Christum; scd unum Christum → sed unum Christum.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.15 (PL 35:1551–1553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
19.16PL 35:1553
Nunc audite de resurrectione corporum, non me, sed Dominum locuturum, propter eos qui resur rexerunt surgendo a morte, inhaerendo vitæ, Cui vitæ? Quæ non novit mortem. Quare non novit mortem? Quia nescit mutabilitatem. Quare nescit mutabilita tem? Quia vita est in semetipso. Et potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere, quia filius hominis est. Quod ju dicium, quale judicium? Nolite mirari hoc, quia dixi, Dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere. Quia venit hora. Non addidit, et nunc est: ergo horam quamdam vult insinuare in fine sæculi. Hora nunc est ut resurgant mortui, hora erit in fine sæculi ut resurgant mortui: sed resurgant nunc in mente, tunc in carne; resur gant nunc in mente per Verbum Dei Filium Dei, re surgant tunc in carne per Verbum Dei carnem fa ctum, filium hominis. Neque enim ad judicium vivo rum et mortuorum Pater ipse venturus est: nec ta men recedit a Filio Pater. Quomodo ergo non ipse venturus est? Quia non ipse videbitur in judicio. Vi debunt in quem pupugerunt. Forma illa erit judex, quae stetit sub judice; illa judicabit quæ judicata est: judicata est enim inique, judicabit juste. Veniet ergo forma servi, et ipsa apparebit. Etenim forma Dei quomodo appareret justis et ini quis? Nam si judicium non fieret nisi inter solos ju stos, appareret tanquam justis forma Dei: quia vero judicium futurum est justorum et iniquorum, nec Ii cet ut iniqui videant Deum; Beati enim mundi corde, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt; talis appa rebit judex, qualis videri possit et ab eis quos coronaturus est, et ab eis quos damnaturus est. Forma ergo servi videbitur, occulta erit forma Dei. Occultus erit in servo Filius Dei, et apparebit filius hominis; quia potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere, quia filius homi nis est, Et quia ipse solus apparebit in forma servi, Pater autem non apparebit, quia non est indutus forma servi; ideo superius ait, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio. Bene ergo dilatum est, ut ipse esset expositor qui propositor. Superius enim occultum erat; nunc jam, ut arbitror, manifestum est quia dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere, quia Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio: quia judicium per illam formam futurum est, quam non habet Pater. Et quale judicium? Nolite mirari hoc; quia venit hora: non ea quae nunc cst, ut resur gant animæ; sed quæ futura est, ut resurgant corpora.
Now hear, concerning the resurrection of bodies, not me but the Lord, who is about to speak, on account of those who have risen by rising from death, by clinging to life. To what life? To the life that knows no death. Why does it know no death? Because it knows no changeableness. Why does it know no changeableness? Because it is life in itself. “And he has given him power to execute judgment also, because he is the son of man.” What judgment, what kind of judgment? “Do not marvel at this,” that I said, “He has given him power to execute judgment also”; “for the hour is coming.” He did not add, “and now is”; so he wishes to suggest a certain hour at the end of the world. Now is the hour for the dead to rise; there will be an hour at the end of the world for the dead to rise: but let them rise now in the mind, then in the flesh; let them rise now in the mind through the Word of God, the Son of God; let them rise then in the flesh through the Word of God made flesh, the son of man. For the Father himself will not come to the judgment of the living and the dead; and yet the Father does not withdraw from the Son. How, then, will he himself not come? Because he himself will not be seen at the judgment. “They will look on him whom they pierced.” That form will be judge which stood before a judge; that will judge which was judged: for it was judged unjustly; it will judge justly. The form of a servant, then, will come, and it will appear. For how would the form of God appear to the just and the unjust? If the judgment were to take place among the just alone, the form of God would appear as to the just; but because the judgment is to be of the just and the unjust, and the unjust are not permitted to see God—for “blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God”—the judge will appear in such a form as can be seen both by those he is to crown and by those he is to condemn. The form of a servant, then, will be seen; the form of God will be hidden. The Son of God will be hidden in the servant, and the son of man will appear; because “he has given him power to execute judgment also, because he is the son of man.” And because he alone will appear in the form of a servant, while the Father will not appear, because he has not put on the form of a servant, therefore he said above, “The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son.” So it was rightly deferred, that the one who set the question might be the one who explained it. For above it was hidden; now, as I think, it is clear that “he has given him power to execute judgment also,” because “the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son”: because the judgment will be by means of that form which the Father does not have. And what kind of judgment? “Do not marvel at this, for the hour is coming”: not the one that is now, for souls to rise, but the one that is to come, for bodies to rise.
John 5:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Zech 12:10 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:22 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ will judge in the form of a servant, visible to just and unjust alike, which is why “the Father judges no one.”
- Zech 12:10 (as in John 19:37), Matt 5:8, and Phil 2:7 (“form of a servant”) are drawn on.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; words run together in the digital text): Cui vin:? → Cui vitæ?; Quæ nou novit → Quæ non novit; nun novit → non novit; in line sæculi → in fine sæculi; Neque euim → Neque enim; quai judicata → quæ judicata; fierct → fieret; ct ab eis → et ab eis; Bcne ergo → Bene ergo; manifestum cst quia → manifestum est quia; Paler non judicat quemquam, aed → Pater non judicat quemquam, sed; futuraest → futura est.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology, Trinity
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.16 (PL 35:1553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
19.17PL 35:1553
Expressius hoc dicat, ut calumniam haereticus negator resurrectionis corporis non inveniat: quan quam jam intellectus elucescat. Cum superius dictum esset, Venit hora; addidit, et nunc est: modo autem, Venit hora; non addidit, et nunc est. Tamen omnes ansas, omnes claviculas calumniarum, omnes nodos laqueorum aperta veritate disrumpat. Nolite mirari hoc; quia venit hora, in qua omnes qui in monumentis sunt. Quid evidentius? quid expressius? Corpora sunt in monumentis: animæ non sunt in monumentis, nec justorum, nec iniquorum. Justi anima in sinu Abrahæ fuit, iniqui anima apud inferos torquebatur: in monumento, nec illa, nec illa. Supe rius quando ait, Venit hora, et nunc est; obsecro, intendite. Nostis, fratres, quia ad panem ventris cum labore pervenitur; quanto magis ad panem mentis? Cum labore suus, ci auditis; sed nos cum majore stamus, et loquimur. Si laboramus propter vos, col laborare non debetis propter eosdem vos? Superius ergo cum diceret, Venit hora, et adderet, et nunc est, quid subjecit? Quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et qui audierint vivent. Non dixit, Omnes mortui audient, et qui audierint vivent: mortuos enim ini quos volebat intelligi. Et numquid omnes iniqui obau diunt Evangelio? Aperte dicit Apostolus, Sed non omnes obaudiunt Evangelio. Tamen qui audiunt, vivent; quia omnes qui obaudiunt Evange lio, transient ad vitam æternam per fidem: non ta mcn omnes obaudiunt, et hoc nunc est. At vero in fine, omnes qui sunt in monumentis, hoc est justi et injusti, audient vocem ejus, et procedent. Quomodo noluit dicere, et vivent? Omnes enim procedent, sed non omnes vivent. In eo quippe quod supra dixit, Et qui audierint vivent; in ipsa obauditione vitam æternam intelligi voluit et beatam, quam non omnes habebunt qui de monumentis procedent. Jam ergo et commemoratione monumentorum, et expressione processionis de monumentis, aperte intelligimus cor porum resurrectionem.
Let him say this more expressly, so that the heretic who denies the resurrection of the body may find no ground for cavil—although the meaning is already shining out. When it was said above, “The hour is coming,” he added, “and now is”; but now, “The hour is coming,” and he did not add, “and now is.” Still, let him break with open truth all the handles, all the little hooks of cavils, all the knots of snares. “Do not marvel at this, for the hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs.” What is clearer? What more express? Bodies are in the tombs; souls are not in the tombs, neither of the just nor of the unjust. The soul of the just man was in Abraham's bosom; the soul of the unjust man was tormented in hell: neither the one nor the other in a tomb. Above, when he said, “The hour is coming, and now is”—I beg you, pay attention. You know, brothers, that one reaches the bread of the belly with toil; how much more the bread of the mind? You stand and hear with toil; but we stand and speak with greater toil. If we labor for your sake, ought you not to labor with us for your own sake? Above, then, when he said, “The hour is coming,” and added, “and now is,” what did he subjoin? “When the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.” He did not say, “All the dead will hear, and those who hear will live”; for he wished the dead to be understood as the unjust. And do all the unjust obey the gospel? The apostle says openly, “But not all obey the gospel.” Yet those who hear will live, because all who obey the gospel will pass to eternal life through faith; yet not all obey, and this is now. But at the end, “all who are in the tombs,” that is, just and unjust, “will hear his voice and come forth.” Why was he unwilling to say, “and will live”? For all will come forth, but not all will live. For in what he said above, “And those who hear will live,” he wished eternal and blessed life to be understood in the very obeying, which not all will have who come forth from the tombs. So now, by the mention of the tombs and by the express statement of the coming forth from the tombs, we plainly understand the resurrection of bodies.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
John 5:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 16:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 16:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 10:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:29 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: “All who are in the tombs” shows that Christ now speaks of the bodily resurrection of just and unjust, not of the present rising of minds.
- Luke 16:22–23 (the rich man and Lazarus) and Rom 10:16 are drawn on. The digital text is damaged at “You stand and hear with toil” (cum labore suus, ci auditis); translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): non iuveniat → non inveniat; supcrius → superius; omnes ausas → omnes ansas; monumenti, sunt → monumentis sunt; nee justorum → nec justorum; nec illa, nee illa → nec illa, nec illa; cl nunc eat → et nunc est; Filii Deit et → Filii Dei, et; audierim vivent → audierint vivent; quL audiunt → qui audiunt; no-. luit → noluit; qni audierint → qui audierint; vuluit → voluit.
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.17 (PL 35:1553; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-17) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
19.18PL 35:1553–1555
Audient omnes vocem ejus, et procedent. Et ubi judicium, si omnes audient, et omnes procedent? Quasi totum confusum est; nihil video discretum. Certe accepisti potestatem judicandi, quia filius homi nis es; ecce aderis in judicio, resurgent corpora: de ipso judicio dic aliquid, hoc est de discretione malo rum et bonorum. Et hoc audi: Qui bona fecerunt, in resurrectione vitœ; qui mala egerunt, in resurrectionem judicii. Superius cum de resurrectione mentium et animarum loqueretur, numquid fecit discretionem? Sed omnes qui audient, vivent; quia obaudiendo vi vent. At vero resurgendo et procedendo de monumen tis, non omnes ad vitam æternam ibunt, sed qui bene fecerunt: qui autem male, ad judicium. Hic enim judicium pro poena posuit. Et erit diremptio, et non qualis modo est. Nam et modo separamur non locis, sed moribus, affectibus, desideriis, fide, spe, charitate. Simul enim cum iniquis vivimus; sed non una vita est omnium: in occulto dirimimur, in oc culto separamur; quomodo grana in area, non quo modo grana in horreo. Et separantur grana in area, et miscentur: separantur, cum a palea exspoliantur; miscentur, quia nondum ventilantur. Tunc aperta erit separatio, sicut morum, sic et vitae; sicut sapien tiæ, ita et corporum. ibunt qui bene fecerunt, vivere cum Angelis Dei: qui male egerant, torqueri cum diabolo et angelis ejus. Et transiet forma servi. Ad hoc enim se præsentaverat ut faceret judicium: post judicium perget hinc, ducet secum corpus cui caput est, et offeret regnum Deo. Tunc plane videbitur forma illa Dei, quæ non potuit videri ab ini quis, quorum visioni forma servi exhibenda erat. Dicit et alibi sic: Ibunt isti in ambustionem œternam (de quibusdam sinistris); justi autem in vitam œter- Nam: de qua alio loco dicit, Hœc est autem vita œterna, ut cognoscant te unum verum Deum, et quem misisti Jesum Christum. Tunc ibi apparebit qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse œqualis Deo: tunc se ostendet quomodo se dilectoribus suis ostensurum promisit. Qui enim diligit me, ait, man data mea custodit; et qui diligit me, diligetur a Patre meo, et ego diligam eum, et ostendam meipsum illi.. Quibus loquebatur, præsens eis erat: sed formam servi videbant; formam autem Dei non videbant. Per jumentum ad stabulum ducebantur curandi, sed sanati videbunt; quia ostendam, inquit, meipsum illi. Quo modo ostenditur æqualis Patri? Cum dicit Philippo, Qui me videt, videt et Patrem meum.
“All will hear his voice and come forth.” And where is the judgment, if all will hear and all will come forth? It is as if everything is confused; I see nothing distinguished. Certainly you have received the power of judging, because you are the son of man; see, you will be present at the judgment; bodies will rise: say something about the judgment itself, that is, about the separation of the bad and the good. Hear this too: “Those who have done good, to the resurrection of life; those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.” Above, when he was speaking of the resurrection of minds and souls, did he make a distinction? No: “all who hear will live,” because by obeying they will live. But in rising and coming forth from the tombs, not all will go to eternal life, but those who have done well; those who have done evil, to judgment. For here he has put “judgment” for punishment. And there will be a separation, and not such as there is now. For even now we are separated, not by places, but by conduct, affections, desires, faith, hope, love. For we live together with the unjust, but the life of all is not one: we are divided in secret, separated in secret; as grains on the threshing floor, not as grains in the granary. Grains on the threshing floor are both separated and mixed: separated, when they are stripped of the chaff; mixed, because they are not yet winnowed. Then the separation will be open: as of conduct, so also of life; as of wisdom, so also of bodies. Those who have done well will go to live with the angels of God; those who have done evil, to be tormented with the devil and his angels. And the form of a servant will pass away. For it presented itself for this purpose, to execute judgment; after the judgment he will go away from here, he will lead with him the body whose head he is, and he will offer the kingdom to God. Then indeed that form of God will be seen which could not be seen by the unjust, to whose sight the form of a servant had to be displayed. He speaks thus elsewhere too: “These will go into everlasting burning” (of certain ones on the left), “but the righteous into eternal life”; of which he says in another place, “And this is eternal life, that they may know you, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.” Then there will appear he who, “being in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal with God.” Then he will show himself, as he promised he would show himself to those who love him. For “he who loves me,” he says, “keeps my commandments; and he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will show myself to him.” He was present to those to whom he was speaking; but they saw the form of a servant; the form of God they did not see. They were being led on the beast of burden to the inn to be cured; but once healed they will see, because “I will show myself,” he says, “to him.” How is he shown equal to the Father? When he says to Philip, “He who sees me sees my Father also.”
John 5:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 3:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 25:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:46 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:34 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: At the bodily resurrection the good and the wicked will be openly separated, and after judging in the form of a servant Christ will show the form of God to those who love him.
- John 5:29, Matt 25:41, 46, John 17:3, Phil 2:6, John 14:21, and John 14:9 are quoted; the threshing floor recalls Matt 3:12, the delivering of the kingdom 1 Cor 15:24, and the beast and the inn the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:34).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; words run together in the digital text): ouines procedent → omnes procedent; ccce aderis → ecce aderis; »t bonorum → et bonorum; mentium cl animarum → mentium et animarum; AL vero → At vero; separamur nun locis → separamur non locis; spe y charitate → spe, charitate; enin cum → enim cum; dirimimnr → dirimimur; noR → non; vivcre → vivere; curn diabolo → cum diabolo; oferet → offeret; Dieit et → Dicit et; sinisiris → sinistris; Hœc eat autem → Hœc est autem; prOtnisit → promisit; diligitme → diligit me; duccbanturcurandi → ducebantur curandi.
Topics: Eschatology, Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.18 (PL 35:1553–1555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-18) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
19.19PL 35:1555
Non possum ego a meipso facere quidquam: sicut audio judico, et judicium meum justum est. Quia dicturi illi eramus, Tu judicabis, et Pater non judi cabit, quia omne judicium dedit Filio; non ergo se eundum Patrem judicabis: adjecit, Non possum ego a meipso facere quidquam: sicut audio judico, et judi cium meum justum est; quia non quœro voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Certe Filius quos vult vivificat. Non quaerit voluntatem suam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit illum. Non meam, non pro priam; non meam, non filii hominis; non meam, quae resistat Deo. Faciunt enim homines voluntatem suam, non Dei, quando faciunt quod volunt, non quod jubet Deus: quando autem ita faciunt quod vo lunt, ut tamen sequantur voluntatem Dei, non fa ciunt voluntatem suam, quamvis quod volunt faciant. Volens fac quod juberis; atque ita et hoc facies quod vis, et non voluntatem tuam facies, sed jubentis.
“I can do nothing of myself: as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just.” Because we were going to say to him, “You will judge, and the Father will not judge, because he has given all judgment to the Son; so you will not judge according to the Father,” he added, “I can do nothing of myself: as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just; because I do not seek my own will, but the will of him who sent me.” Certainly “the Son gives life to whom he will.” He does not seek his own will, but the will of him who sent him. Not mine, not my own; not mine, not that of the son of man; not mine, such as would resist God. For people do their own will, not God's, when they do what they will, not what God commands; but when they do what they will in such a way that they nonetheless follow the will of God, they do not do their own will, although they do what they will. Do willingly what you are commanded; and so you will both do what you will and not do your own will, but that of the one commanding.
John 5:30 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ seeks not his own will, as son of man, but the Father's; doing God's command willingly is not doing one's own will.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): justum eat. Qnia → justum est. Quia; orne judicium → omne judicium; volutatem → voluntatem; qaae resistat → quae resistat; jubel Deus:: → jubet Deus:; jubcris → juberis; ct non voluntatem → et non voluntatem.
Topics: Christology, Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.19 (PL 35:1555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
19.20PL 35:1555
Quid ergo? Sicut audio, ita judico. Audit Filius, et demonstrat ei Pater, et videt Filius Patrem fa cientem. Et ista distuleramus paulo enucleatius pro viribus pertractare, si tempus nobis peracta lectione et vires remansissent. Si dicam me posse loqui adhuc. forte vos audire jam non potestis. Item forte aviditate audiendi dicitis, Possumus. Melius est ergo ut ego infirmitatem meam fatear, quia jam fatigatus loqui non possum, quam ut vobis jam bene satiatis, adhuc infundam quod non bene digeratis. Proinde hujus promissionis quam ad hodiernum tempus, si superesset, distuleram, tenete me adjuvante Domino in crastinum debitorem.
What then? “As I hear, so I judge.” The Son hears, and the Father shows him, and the Son sees the Father doing. And we had deferred treating these matters a little more thoroughly, as far as our strength allows, if time and strength remained to us when the reading had been finished. If I were to say that I can still speak, perhaps you can no longer listen. Again, perhaps, in your eagerness to hear, you say, “We can.” It is better, then, that I confess my weakness, that being now tired I cannot speak, than that I should pour still more into you, who are already well filled, which you would not digest well. Therefore, as to this promise, which I had deferred to today's time if any remained, hold me, with the Lord's help, your debtor until tomorrow.
John 5:30 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Too tired to continue, Augustine postpones the deferred question to the next day.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Quid crgo? → Quid ergo?; ct vires → et vires.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 19.20 (PL 35:1555; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/19-15/#p-19-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-19-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.