Tractates on the Gospel of John 27.1–27.12

Latin text: Migne, PL 35 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 7 (1888).

Show

Chapter 27

27.1PL 35:1615

Verba Domini ex Evangelio, quæ sermonem pristinum consequuntur, audivimus. Illuc sermo de­ betur auribus et mentibus vestris, et hodierno die non importunus est: est enim de corpore Domini, quod dicebat se dare ad manducandum propter æter­ nam vitam. Exposuit autem modum attributionis hu­ jus et doni sui, quomodo daret carnem suam mandu­ care, dicens, Qui manducat carnem meam, et bibit sanguinem meum, in me manet, et ego in illo. Signum quia manducavit et bibit hoc est, si ma­ net et manetur, si habitat et inhabitatur, si hæret ut non deseratur. Hoc ergo nos docuit et admonuit mysticis verbis, ut simus in ejus corpore sub ipso capite in membris ejus, edentes carnem ejus, non relinquentes unitatem ejus. Sed qui aderant plures non intelligendo scandalizati sunt: non enim cogita­ bant hæc audiendo, nisi carnem, quod ipsi erant. Apostolus autem dicit, et verum dicit, Sapere secun­ dum carnem, mors est. Carnem suam dat nobis Dominus manducare, et sapere secundum carnem mors est; cum de carne sua dicat, quia ibi est vita æterna. Ergo nec carnem debemus sapere secun­ dum carnem, sicut in his verbis:

We have heard the words of the Lord from the Gospel which follow the previous sermon. From them a sermon is owed to your ears and minds, and it is not out of season today; for it is about the body of the Lord, which he said he gives to be eaten for the sake of eternal life. And he explained the manner of this bestowal and gift of his, how he gives his flesh to eat, saying, “He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.” The sign that one has eaten and drunk is this: if he abides and is abided in, if he dwells and is dwelt in, if he clings so as not to be forsaken. This, then, he has taught us and admonished us in mystical words: that we should be in his body, under him as head, in his members, eating his flesh, not abandoning his unity. But most of those present, by not understanding, were scandalized; for in hearing these things they thought only of flesh, which is what they themselves were. But the apostle says, and says truly, “To think according to the flesh is death.” The Lord gives us his flesh to eat, and to think according to the flesh is death; yet he says of his flesh that eternal life is there. So we ought not to think even of the flesh according to the flesh, as in these words:

John 6:56 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:6 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Eating Christ's flesh means abiding in him and in the unity of his body; those who thought of his flesh carnally were scandalized.

  • John 6:56 and Rom 8:6 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray marks in the digital text): auribus ct mentibus vestris, et hodierno dici → auribus et mentibus vestris, et hodierno die; auributionis → attributionis; bibit hoc cst, si → bibit hoc est, si; inhabitatur. si hæret ut non deseratur '. Hoc ergo nos docuit ct admonuit mysticis verbis ♦ ut → inhabitatur, si hæret ut non deseratur. Hoc ergo nos docuit et admonuit mysticis verbis, ut; uon relinquentes → non relinquentes; et veruin dicit → et verum dicit; Carnem suant dat → Carnem suam dat; mors eat; cum → mors est; cum; in bis verbis → in his verbis.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.1 (PL 35:1615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.2PL 35:1615

Multi itaque audientes; non ex inimicis, sed ex discipulis ejus, dixerunt: Durus est hic sermo; quis po­ test eum audire? Si discipuli durum habuerunt istum sermonem, quid inimici? Et tamen sic oportebat ut diceretur, quod non ab omnibus intelligeretur. Se­ cretum Dei intentos debet facere, non adversos. Isti autem cito defecerunt, talia loquente Domino Jesu: non crediderunt aliquid magnum dicentem, et verbis illis aliquam gratiam cooperientem; sed prout volue­ runt ita intellexerunt, et more hominum, quia poterat Jesus, aut hoc disponebat Jesus, carnem quia indu­ tum erat Verbum, veluti concisam distribuere cre­ dentibus in se. Durus est, inquiunt, hic sermo; quis potest eum audire?

“So many, hearing”—not of his enemies, but “of his disciples—said, This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?” If the disciples found this saying hard, what of the enemies? And yet it had to be said in such a way that it would not be understood by all. The secret of God ought to make people attentive, not hostile. But these quickly fell away when the Lord Jesus said such things: they did not believe him to be saying something great and covering some grace with those words; but they understood as they wished, and in the manner of men, that Jesus was able, or that Jesus was planning, to distribute the flesh with which the Word was clothed, cut up as it were, to those who believed in him. “This is a hard saying,” they say; “who can listen to it?”

John 6:60 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Many disciples found the saying hard because they understood it carnally, as if Christ would distribute his flesh in pieces.

  • John 6:60 is quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): nOn ex' inimicis, sed ex discipulisejus, dixerunt: Durus ese hic → non ex inimicis, sed ex discipulis ejus, dixerunt: Durus est hic; quid iuimici? Et tamen sic oportebat ut diccretur, qnod nan ab → quid inimici? Et tamen sic oportebat ut diceretur, quod non ab; Sc­ cretum Dei intentos debet facere, nun adversos → Se­ cretum Dei intentos debet facere, non adversos; quia poternt Jesus → quia poterat Jesus.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.2 (PL 35:1615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.3PL 35:1615

Sciens autem Jesus apud semetipsum quia mur­ murarent de eo discipuli ejus. Sic enim apud se ista dixerunt, ut ab illo non audirentur; sed ille qui eos noverat in seipsis, audiens apud semetipsum, respon­ dit, et ait, Hoc vos scandalizat: quia dixi, Carnem meam do vobis manducare, et sanguinem meum bi­ bere, hoc vos nempe scandalizat. Si ergo videritis Fi­ lium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Quid est hoc? Hinc solvit quod illos moverat? hinc aperuit unde fuerant scandalizati? Hinc plane, si intelligerent. Illi enim putabant eum erogaturum corpus suum; ille autem dixit se ascensurum in cœlum, utique integrum. Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius; certe vel tunc videbitis quia non eo modo quo putatis, erogat corpus suum; certe vel tunc intellige­ tis quia gratia ejus non consumitur morsibus.

“But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples were murmuring about it”—for they said these things among themselves so as not to be heard by him; but he who knew them in themselves, hearing in himself, answered and said, “Does this scandalize you?”—because I said, I give you my flesh to eat and my blood to drink, this, of course, scandalizes you. “What, then, if you see the Son of man ascending where he was before?” What is this? Did he by this resolve what had disturbed them? Did he by this lay open why they had been scandalized? Plainly by this, if they understood. For they thought he was going to dole out his body; but he said he would ascend into heaven, whole, of course. “When you see the Son of man ascending where he was before”: surely then at least you will see that he does not dole out his body in the way you think; surely then at least you will understand that his grace is not consumed by bites.

John 6:61 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:62 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ's ascension, whole, into heaven answers the scandal: his body is not doled out in pieces, nor is his grace consumed by bites.

  • John 6:61–62 is quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): qui cos noverat → qui eos noverat; scandalizal: quia dixi, Cantem meam → scandalizat: quia dixi, Carnem meam; Quid est hoc Hinc solvit → Quid est hoc? Hinc solvit; II i enim putabant eum crogaturum corpus suunt → Illi enim putabant eum erogaturum corpus suum.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.3 (PL 35:1615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.4PL 35:1615–1617

Et ait: Spiritus est qui vivificat, caro noM prodest quidquam. Hoc antequam exponamus, ut Dominus do­ nat, illud non negligenter prætereundum est, quod ait, Si ergo videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Filius enim hominis Christus, ex virgine Maria. Ergo filius hominis hic cœpit esse in terra, ubi carnem assumpsit ex terra. Unde prophetice dictum erat, Veritas de terra orta est. Quid sibi ergo vult quod ait, Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Nulla enim esset quæstio si ita dixisset, Si videritis Filium Dei ascendentem ubi erat prius? cum vero Filium hominis dixit ascenden­ tem ubi erat prius, numquid Filius hominis in cœlo erat prius, quando in terra esse cœpit? Hic quidem dixit, ubi erat prius, quasi tunc non ibi esset quando hæc loquebatur. Alio autem loco ait, Nemo ascendit in cœlum, nisi qui de cœlo descendit, Filius hominis, qui est in cœlo: non dixit, erat, sed, Filius, inquit, hominis qui est in cœlo. In terra loquebatur, et in cælo se esse dicebat. Et non ita dixit: Nemo ascen­ dit in cœlum, nisi qui de caelo descendit, Filius Dei, I? qui cst in cocl>. Quo pertinet, nisi ut intelligamus, quod etiam pristino sermone commendavi Charitati vestræ, unam personam esse Christum Deum et ho­ minem, non duas; ne fides nostra non sit Trinitas, sed quaternitas? Christus ergo unus est: Verbum, ani­ ma et caro unus Christus: Filius Dei et filius homi­ nis unus Christus. Filius Dei semper, filius hominis ex tempore; tamen unus Christus secundum unitatem personæ. In coelo erat, quando in terra loquebatur. Sic erat filius hominis in coelo, quomodo Filius Dei erat in terra; Filius Dei in terra in suscepta carne, filius hominis in coelo in unitate personæ.

“And he said, It is the Spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing.” Before we explain this, as the Lord grants, we must not carelessly pass over what he said: “What, then, if you see the Son of man ascending where he was before?” For Christ is the Son of man, from the Virgin Mary. So the Son of man began to be here on earth, where he took flesh from the earth. Hence it had been said prophetically, “Truth has sprung from the earth.” What, then, does he mean by saying, “When you see the Son of man ascending where he was before”? For there would be no question if he had said, “If you see the Son of God ascending where he was before.” But since he said the Son of man was ascending where he was before, was the Son of man in heaven before, when he began to be on earth? Here indeed he said, “where he was before,” as if he were not there when he was saying these things. But in another place he says, “No one has ascended into heaven except him who came down from heaven, the Son of man, who is in heaven.” He did not say “was,” but, “the Son of man,” he says, “who is in heaven.” He was speaking on earth and saying that he was in heaven. And he did not say, “No one has ascended into heaven except him who came down from heaven, the Son of God, who is in heaven.” What is the point, except that we should understand what I also commended to your Charity in the previous sermon: that Christ, God and man, is one person, not two, lest our faith be not a trinity but a quaternity? So Christ is one: the Word, soul, and flesh, one Christ; the Son of God and son of man, one Christ. Son of God always, son of man from a point in time; yet one Christ in unity of person. He was in heaven when he was speaking on earth. The son of man was in heaven in the same way as the Son of God was on earth: the Son of God on earth in the flesh he had taken up, the son of man in heaven in the unity of person.

John 6:63 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:62 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 85:11 (84:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:13 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Son of man is said to have been in heaven before because Christ, God and man, is one person, not two, lest the Trinity become a quaternity.

  • John 6:62–63, Ps 85:11 (84:12 LXX), and John 3:13 are quoted. The phrase after “Filius Dei” is garbled in the digital text (I? qui cst in cocl>) and is translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray marks): hiccocpil issc in terra → hic cœpit esse in terra; Veritas de erra orta → Veritas de terra orta; cum vcro Filium → cum vero Filium; ascenden­ tcin ubi erat prius, numquid Filius hominis in cœlo crat prius, quando in terra esse cocpit → ascenden­ tem ubi erat prius, numquid Filius hominis in cœlo erat prius, quando in terra esse cœpit; in cælo se csse → in cælo se esse; Christus ergo unus cst: Verbum,aui­ t Ina ct caro → Christus ergo unus est: Verbum, ani­ ma et caro; homi­ i nis unus Cin istus → homi­ nis unus Christus; unilalem → unitatem; filius. luminis in coelo → filius hominis in coelo.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.4 (PL 35:1615–1617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.5PL 35:1617

Quid est ergo quod adjungit, Spiritus est qui vi­ vificat, caro non prodest quidquam? Dicamus ei (pati­ tur enim nos non contradicentes, sed nosse cupientes): O Domine, magister bone, quomodo caro non prodest quidquam, cum tu dixeris, Nisi quis manducaverit car­ nem meam, et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam? An vita non prodest quidquam? et propter quid sumus quod sumus, nisi ut habeamus vitam æter­ nam, quam tua carne promittis? quid est ergo, non prodest quidquam caro? Non prodest quidquam, sed quomodo illi intellexerunt: carnem quippe sic intel­ lexerunt, quomodo in cadavere dilaniatur, aut in ma­ cello venditur, non quomodo spiritu vegetatur. Proin­ de sic dictum est, Caro non prodest quidquam; quomodo dictum est, Scientia inflat. Jam ergo debemus odisse scientiam? Absit. Et quid est, Scientia inflat? Sola, sine charitate: ideo adjunxit, Charitas vero ædificat. Adde ergo scientiae charitatem, et utilis erit scientia; non per se, sed per charitatem. Sic etiam nunc, caro non prodest quidquam, sed sola caro: accedat spiritus ad carnem, quomodo accedit charitas ad scientiam, et prodest plurimum. Nam si caro nihil prodesset, Verbum caro non fieret, ut inhabitaret in nobis. Si per carnem nobis multum profuit Christus, quomodo caro nihil prodest? Sed per carnem Spiri­ tus aliquid pro salute nostra egit. Caro vas fuit; quod habebat attende, non quod erat. Apostoli missi sunt; numquid caro ipsorum nihil nobis profuit? Si caro Apostolorum nobis profuit, caro Domini potuit nihil prodesse? Unde enim ad nos sonus verbi, nisi per vo­ cem carnis? unde stilus, unde conscriptio? Ista omnia opera carnis sunt, sed agitante spiritu tanquam organum suum. Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam: sicut illi intellexerunt carnem, non sic ego do ad manducandum carnem meam.

What is it, then, that he adds: “It is the Spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing”? Let us say to him (for he bears with us, not contradicting but wanting to know): O Lord, good teacher, how does the flesh profit nothing, when you have said, “Unless one eats my flesh and drinks my blood, he will not have life in him”? Or does life profit nothing? And why are we what we are, except that we may have eternal life, which you promise through your flesh? What, then, is “the flesh profits nothing”? It profits nothing—but in the way they understood it. For they understood flesh as it is torn apart in a corpse or sold in the market, not as it is quickened by the spirit. So it was said, “The flesh profits nothing,” in the way it was said, “Knowledge puffs up.” Must we, then, now hate knowledge? Far from it. And what is “Knowledge puffs up”? Alone, without love; therefore he added, “But love builds up.” So add love to knowledge, and knowledge will be useful, not through itself but through love. So too now: the flesh profits nothing, but flesh alone; let the spirit come to the flesh, as love comes to knowledge, and it profits very much. For if the flesh profited nothing, the Word would not have become flesh to dwell among us. If Christ has profited us much through the flesh, how does the flesh profit nothing? But through the flesh the Spirit did something for our salvation. The flesh was a vessel: consider what it held, not what it was. The apostles were sent; did their flesh profit us nothing? If the apostles' flesh profited us, could the Lord's flesh profit nothing? For how does the sound of the word come to us, except through the voice of the flesh? How the pen, how the writing? All these are works of the flesh, but with the spirit moving it as its instrument. “So it is the Spirit that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing”: I do not give my flesh to eat in the way they understood flesh.

John 6:63 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:53 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 8:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “The flesh profits nothing” means flesh alone, understood as dead meat; quickened by the Spirit, as knowledge by love, Christ's flesh profits greatly.

  • John 6:63, John 6:53, 1 Cor 8:1, and John 1:14 are quoted. Augustine's account of how Christ gives his flesh is translated exactly.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): vi­ vificat, raro non → vi­ vificat, caro non; pati­ tur enin nos non contradicentes, sed nosse cupieuLes): O Domine, magister bone, quomodo caru non → pati­ tur enim nos non contradicentes, sed nosse cupientes): O Domine, magister bone, quomodo caro non; Nisi quia manducaverit → Nisi quis manducaverit; non habebit in ac vitam → non habebit in se vitam; carnem quippc sic → carnem quippe sic; spiritu vcgetatur → spiritu vegetatur; Et quid est, Scicntia inflat? Sola, sine charitate: idco → Et quid est, Scientia inflat? Sola, sine charitate: ideo; profuil Christus → profuit Christus; quod habehat attende → quod habebat attende; nihil nobis proruit? Si caro Apostulorum uobis profuit, caro Donnini → nihil nobis profuit? Si caro Apostolorum nobis profuit, caro Domini; per vo­ cern carnis → per vo­ cem carnis; opera caruis sunt → opera carnis sunt; Spiritua ergo est → Spiritus ergo est; caro autem noM prodest → caro autem non prodest.

Topics: Eucharist, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.5 (PL 35:1617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.6PL 35:1617

Proinde, Verba, inquit, quæ ego locutus sum vo­ bis, spiritus et vita est. Diximus enim, fratres, hoc Do­ minum commendasse in manducatione carnis suæ et potatione sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneamus, et ipse in nobis. Manemus autem in illo, cum sumus membra ejus: manet autem ipse in nobis, cum sumus tem­ plum ejus. Ut autem simus membra ejus, unitas nos compaginat. Ut compaginet unitas, quæ facit nisi cha­ ritas? Et charitas Dei unde? Apostolum interroga: Charitas, inquit, Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis. Ergo Spiritus est qui vivificat: spiritus enim facit viva mem­ bra. Nec viva membra spiritus facit, nisi quæ in cor­ pore quod vegetat ipse spiritus, invenerit. Nam spi­ ritus qui est in te, o homo, quo constas ut homo sis, numquid vivificat membrum quod separatum invene­ rit a carne tua? Spiritum tuum dico animam tuam: anima tua non vivificat nisi membra quæ sunt in carne tua; unum si tollas, jam non vivificatur ex anima tua, quia unitati corporis tui non copulatur. Hæc di­ cuntur ut amemus unitatem, et timeamus separatio­ nem. Nihil enim sic debet formidare christianus, quam separari a corpore Christi. Si enim separatur a cor­ pore Christi, non est membrum ejus; si non est mem­ brum ejus, non vegetatur Spiritu ejus: Quisquis au­ tem, inquit Apostolus, Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam. Verba quæ ego lo­ cutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita sunt. Quid est, spiritus et vita sunt? Spiritualiter intelligenda sunt. Intellexisti spiritualiter? spiritus et vita sunt. Intellexisti carnali­ ter? etiam sic illa spiritus et vita sunt, sed tibi non sunt.

Accordingly, “the words,” he says, “that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” For we have said, brothers, that the Lord commended this in the eating of his flesh and the drinking of his blood: that we should abide in him and he in us. And we abide in him when we are his members; he abides in us when we are his temple. But for us to be his members, unity joins us together. What makes unity join us, except love? And the love of God, from where? Ask the apostle: “The love of God,” he says, “has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” So “it is the Spirit that gives life”: for the spirit makes living members. Nor does the spirit make living members except those it finds in the body that the spirit itself quickens. For does the spirit that is in you, O man, by which you are constituted a man, give life to a member that it finds cut off from your flesh? By your spirit I mean your soul: your soul gives life only to the members that are in your flesh; if you take one away, it is no longer given life by your soul, because it is not joined to the unity of your body. These things are said so that we may love unity and fear separation. For a Christian ought to dread nothing so much as being separated from the body of Christ. For if he is separated from the body of Christ, he is not his member; if he is not his member, he is not quickened by his Spirit. “But whoever,” says the apostle, “does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.” “So it is the Spirit that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” What is “are spirit and life”? They are to be understood spiritually. Have you understood spiritually? They are spirit and life. Have you understood carnally? Even so they are spirit and life, but not for you.

John 6:63 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:56 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:16 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 5:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Spirit gives life only to members joined in the unity of Christ's body, as the soul quickens only attached limbs; so the Christian must dread separation from that body.

  • John 6:63, Rom 5:5, and Rom 8:9 are quoted; the temple recalls 1 Cor 3:16.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark in the digital text): quæ ego loculus sum vo­ bia → quæ ego locutus sum vo­ bis; Ut compaginct unitas → Ut compaginet unitas; Apostolum. interroga → Apostolum interroga; Spiritum sancium qui datus eat nobis → Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis; separatura invene → separatum invene; jain non vivificatur → jam non vivificatur; Hæc di. cuntur → Hæc di­ cuntur; separatio. nem → separatio­ nem; quam scparari → quam separari; Quisquis OB. tem, inqnit Apostolus → Quisquis au­ tem, inquit Apostolus; hic non eat ejus → hic non est ejus; spiritus et viia sunt → spiritus et vita sunt; carnali­ tcr → carnali­ ter.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.6 (PL 35:1617; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.7PL 35:1617–1619

Sed sunt quidam, inquit, in vobis qui non cre­ dunt. Non dixit, Sunt quidam in vobis qui non intel­ ligunt; sed causam dixit, quare non intelligant. Sunt enim quidam in vobis qui non credunt; et ideo non intelli­ gunt, quia non credunt. Propheta enim dixit, Nisi credi­ deritis, non intelligetis. Per fidem copulamur, per intellectum vivificamur. Prius hærea­ mus per fidem, ut sit quod vivificetur per intellectum. Nam qui non haeret, resistit; qui resistit, non credit. Nam qui resistit, quomodo vivificatur? Adversarius est radio lucis, quo penetrandus est: non avertit aciem, sed claudit mentem. Sunt ergo quidam qui non credunt. Credant et aperiant, aperiant et illuminabuntur. Scie­ bat enim ab initio Jesus qui essent credentes, et quis tra­ diturus esset eum. Ibi enim erat et Judas. Nam quidam scandalizati sunt: ille autem mansit ad insidiandum, non ad intelligendum. Et quia ideo manserat, non de illo tacuit Dominus. Non illum expressit, sed nec si­ luit; ut omnes timerent, quamvis unus periret. Sed posteaquam dixit et distinxit credentes a non creden­ tibus, expressit causam quare non credant: Propterea dixi vobis, inquit, quia nemo potest venire ad me, nisi fuerit ei datum a Patre meo. Ergo et credere datur nobis: non enim nihil est credere. Si autem magnum aliquid est, gaude quia credidisti, sed noli extolli: quid enim habes quod non accepisti?

“But there are some among you,” he says, “who do not believe.” He did not say, “There are some among you who do not understand,” but he told the cause why they do not understand. “For there are some among you who do not believe”; and therefore they do not understand, because they do not believe. For the prophet said, “Unless you believe, you will not understand.” Through faith we are joined; through understanding we are given life. Let us first cling through faith, so that there may be something to be given life through understanding. For he who does not cling resists; he who resists does not believe. And how is he who resists given life? He is an adversary to the ray of light by which he ought to be penetrated: he does not turn his eye away, but shuts his mind. “So there are some who do not believe.” Let them believe and open; let them open and they will be enlightened. “For Jesus knew from the beginning who were the believers, and who was to betray him.” For Judas too was there. Some, indeed, were scandalized; but he remained to lie in wait, not to understand. And because he had remained for this reason, the Lord did not keep silent about him. He did not name him, but neither did he keep silent, so that all might fear, though only one would perish. But after he had spoken and distinguished believers from unbelievers, he stated the cause why they do not believe: “Therefore I said to you,” he says, “that no one can come to me unless it has been given him by my Father.” So believing too is given to us; for believing is not nothing. And if it is something great, rejoice that you have believed, but do not be lifted up: “For what do you have that you did not receive?”

John 6:64 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 7:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:65 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some did not understand because they did not believe; faith, which joins us to Christ, is itself a gift of the Father, so the believer must not be proud.

  • John 6:64–65, Isa 7:9 (LXX, Old Latin), and 1 Cor 4:7 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark in the digital text; words run together in the digital text): non intelli. gunt → non intelli­ gunt; non intelligelis. Per Odera copulamur → non intelligetis. Per fidem copulamur; Sunt ergo, quidam → Sunt ergo quidam; Ihi enim erat → Ibi enim erat; adinsidiandum → ad insidiandum; nou de illo tacuk → non de illo tacuit; quamvis unus pcrirct → quamvis unus periret; espressit → expressit; credere, Si autem magnum aliquid cst, gaude qnia credidisti, sed noli extolli: quid cnim labes → credere. Si autem magnum aliquid est, gaude quia credidisti, sed noli extolli: quid enim habes.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.7 (PL 35:1617–1619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.8PL 35:1619

Ex hoc multi discipulorum ejus abierunt retro, et jam non cum illo ambulaverunt. Abierunt retro, sed post Satanam, non post Christum. Nam aliquando Domi­ nus Christus Petrum appellavit Satanam, magis quia volebat præcedere Dominum suum, et consilium dare ne moreretur ille, qui venerat ut moreretur, ne nos in æternum moreremur; et ait illi: Redi post me, Sa­ tanas; non enim sapis quæ Dei sunt, sed quæ hominis sunt. Non illum repulit retro ire post Satanam, et appellavit Satanam; sed fecit post se ire, ut non esset Satanas ambulando post Dominum. Isti autem sic redierunt retro, quomodo de quibusdam fe­ minis dicit Apostolus: Quædam enim conversæ sunt retro post Satanam. Ulterius cum illo non ambulaverunt. Ecce præcisi a corpore vitam perdi­ derunt, quia forte in corpore nec fuerunt. Inter non credentes et ipsi deputandi sunt, quamvis discipuli di­ cerentur. Abierunt retro, non pauci, sed multi. Hoc forte factum est ad consolationem, quoniam aliquando contingit ut dicat homo verum, et quod dicit, non ca­ piatur, atque illi qui audiunt, scandalizentur et disce­ dant. Pænitet autem hominem dixisse quod verum est: dicit enim apud se homo, Non debui sic dicere, non hoc dicere debui. Ecce Domino contigit; dixit, et perdidit multos, remansit ad paucos. Sed non tur­ babatur ipse, quia ab initio noverat et qui credentes essent, et qui non credentes: nos si nobis contingat, perturbamur. Solatium in Domino inveniamus, et ta­ men caute verba dicamus.

“From this time many of his disciples went back, and no longer walked with him.” They went back, but after Satan, not after Christ. For once the Lord Christ called Peter Satan, because he wanted to go ahead of his Lord and to give advice that he should not die—he who had come to die, so that we should not die for ever; and he said to him, “Get behind me, Satan; for you do not think the things of God, but the things of man.” He did not drive him back to go after Satan, and call him Satan; but he made him go behind himself, so that by walking behind the Lord he would not be Satan. But these went back in the way the apostle says of certain women: “For some have already turned back after Satan.” They no longer walked with him. See, cut off from the body, they lost life, because perhaps they were not even in the body. They too are to be counted among unbelievers, although they were called disciples. They went back—not a few, but many. This happened perhaps for our consolation, since it sometimes happens that a man says what is true and what he says is not grasped, and those who hear are scandalized and depart. And the man regrets having said what is true; for he says to himself, “I should not have spoken so; I should not have said this.” See, it happened to the Lord: he spoke and lost many; he was left with few. But he himself was not troubled, because he knew from the beginning who were believers and who were not believers; if it happens to us, we are troubled. Let us find comfort in the Lord, and yet let us speak our words with care.

John 6:66 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:23 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 5:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:64 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Many disciples went back after Satan, not behind Christ as Peter was told; this consoles preachers whose truth drives hearers away, while urging care in speaking.

  • John 6:66, Matt 16:23, and 1 Tim 5:15 are quoted. A stray quotation mark at the end of the digital text is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark in the digital text): post Sanam → post Satanam; præeedcre → præcedere; ut morcretur, ne nos in æternum moreremur; ol ait → ut moreretur, ne nos in æternum moreremur; et ait; et appellavil → et appellavit; Quadam enim conversæ → Quædam enim conversæ; cum Ulo non → cum illo non; luter non eredentes ct ipsi → Inter non credentes et ipsi; Hoc furto factum → Hoc forte factum; dicat homo vcrum, et quod dicit, non ca­ piatur, atque iUi qui awdiunl → dicat homo verum, et quod dicit, non ca­ piatur, atque illi qui audiunt; dicit euirn apud se → dicit enim apud se; non boc dicere → non hoc dicere; caute verba dicamus. " → caute verba dicamus..

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.8 (PL 35:1619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.9PL 35:1619

Atque ille ad paucos qui remanserant: Dixit ergo Jesus duodecim; id est illis duodecim qui reman­ serunt: Numquid et vos, inquit, vultis ire? Non dis­ cessit nec Judas. Sed quare manebat, Domino jam apparebat; nobis postea manifestatus est. Respondit Petrus pro omnibus, unus pro multis, unitas pro universis: Respondit ergo ei Simon Petrus: Domine, ad quem ibimus? Repellis nos a te, da nobis alterum te. Ad quem ibimus? Si a te recedimus, ad quem ibi­ mus? Verba vitæ æternæ habes. Videte quemadmodum Petrus, dante Deo, recreante Spiritu sancto, intel­ lexit. Unde, nisi quia credidit? Verba vitæ æternæ habes. Vitam enim æternam habes in ministratione corporis et sanguinis tui. Et nos credidimus, et cogno­ vimus. Non cognovimus, et credidimus, sed credidi­ mus, et cognovimus. Credidimus enim ut cognoscere­ mus: nam si prius cognoscere, et deinde credere vellemus, nec cognoscere nec credere valeremus. Quid credidimus, et quid cognovimus? Quia tu es Christus Filius Dei; id est, quia ipsa vita aeterna tu es, et non das in carne et sanguine tuo nisi quod es.

And he said to the few who had remained: “So Jesus said to the twelve,” that is, to those twelve who remained, “Do you also want to go away?” Not even Judas departed. But why he was staying was already apparent to the Lord; to us it was made manifest afterward. Peter answered for all, one for many, unity for the whole: “So Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go?” If you drive us away from you, give us another you. “To whom shall we go?” If we withdraw from you, to whom shall we go? “You have the words of eternal life.” See how Peter, by God's gift and the renewing of the Holy Spirit, understood. How, except because he believed? “You have the words of eternal life.” For you have eternal life in the ministering of your body and blood. “And we have believed and have known.” Not “we have known and believed,” but “we have believed and known.” For we believed in order to know; for if we wanted first to know and then to believe, we would be able neither to know nor to believe. What have we believed and what have we known? “That you are the Christ, the Son of God”; that is, that you are eternal life itself, and you give in your flesh and blood nothing but what you are.

John 6:67 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:68 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:69 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter, speaking for all as the sign of unity, confessed that Christ has the words of eternal life; we believe in order to know, and Christ gives in his flesh and blood what he himself is.

  • John 6:67–69 is quoted. Peter speaking “unity for the whole” is Augustine’s image of Peter as figure of the church’s unity.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray marks; stray mark in the digital text): Dixit j ergo Jesus duodedm; id est illis duodecim qui reman- ' serunt → Dixit ergo Jesus duodecim; id est illis duodecim qui reman­ serunt; nee Judas. Scd quare → nec Judas. Sed quare; reoedimus → recedimus; Verba vitæ æternæ; habes. Vitam cnim alteram habes in ministratione i corporis → Verba vitæ æternæ habes. Vitam enim æternam habes in ministratione corporis; cogno­ i vimus → cogno­ vimus; nee eognoscere → nec cognoscere; Filius Det; → Filius Dei;.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.9 (PL 35:1619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.10PL 35:1619

Ait ergo Dominus Jesus: Nonne ego vos duo­ decim elegi, et unus ex vobis diabolus est? Ergo undecim elegi diceret: an eligitur et diabolus, et in electis est diabolus? Electi in laude solent dici: an electus est et iste, de quo nolente et nesciente ma­ gnum aliquid boni fieret? Hoc est proprium Dei; con­ trarium iniquis. Sicut enim iniqui male utuntur bonis operibus Dei; sic contra Deus bene utitur malis ope­ ribus hominum iniquorum. Quam bonum est membra corporis ita esse, quemadmodum disponi non pos­ sunt nisi ab artifice Deo! Petulantia tamen quam male utitur oculis! Fallacia quam male utitur lingua! Falsus testis nonne lingua sua et animam suam prius trucidat, et alterum lædere se perempto conatur? Male utitur lingua, nec ideo malum est lingua: opus Dei est lingua, sed bono opere Dei male utitur illo nequitia. Quomodo utuntur pedibus qui currunt ad scelera? quomodo utuntur manibus homicidæ? et illis adjacentibus forinsecus bonis creaturis Dei quam male utuntur mali? Auro judicia corrumpunt, inno­ centes opprimunt. Luce ista mali male utuntur: male vivendo enim etiam ipsam lucem qua vident, ad mi­ nisterium scelerum suorum usurpant. Iens enim ut faciat aliquid mali malus, lucere sibi vult ne offendat, qui jam intus offendit et cecidit: quod timet in cor­ pore, jam incurrit in corde. Omnibus ergo bonis Dei, ne per singula currere longum sit, male utitur ma­ lus: contra, malis hominum malorum bene utitur bonus. Et quid tam bonum quam unus Deus? Quan­ doquidem ipse Dominus dixit, Nemo bonus nisi unus Deus. Quanto ergo ille melior, tanto melius utitur et malis nostris. Quid Juda pejus? Inter omnes adhærentes Magistro, inter duodecim, loculi illi commissi sunt, et dispensatio pauperum distri­ buta: ingratus tanto beneficio, honori tanto, accepit pecuniam, perdidit justitiam: tradidit vitam mor­ tuus; quem ut discipulus secutus, ut inimicus perse­ cutus est. Totum hoc malum Judæ; sed malo ejus bene usus est Dominus. Tradi se pertulit ut redimeret nos. Ecce malum Judae in bonum conversum est. Sa­ tanas quantos martyres persecutus est? Si Satanas persequendo cessaret, hodie tam gloriosam coronam sancti Laurentii non celebraremus. Si ergo ipsius diaboli malis operibus bene utitur Deus: quod facit malus, male utendo, sibi nocet; non bonitati Dei contradicit. Artifex illo utitur; et magnus artifex, si illo uti non nosset, nec eum esse permitteret. Ergo unus ex vobis diabolus est, ait, cum ego vos duodecim elegerim. Potest et sic intelligi quod ait, duodecim elegi, quia sacratus est numerus. Non enim quia pe­ riit inde unus, ideo illius numeri honor demptus est: nam in locum pereuntis, alius subrogatus est. Mansit numerus consecratus, numerus duode­ narius; quia per universum mundum, hoc est per quatuor cardines mundi, Trinitatem fuerant annun­ tiaturi. Ideo ter quaterni. Se ergo exterminavit Ju­ das, non duodenarium numerum violavit: ipse de­ seruit praeceptorem, nam Deus illi apposuit succes­ sorem.

“So the Lord Jesus said, Did I not choose you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” Should he, then, have said “I chose eleven”? Or is a devil also chosen, and is a devil among the chosen? People are usually called “chosen” in praise: or was he too chosen, so that through him, unwilling and unaware, some great good might be done? This is proper to God; the opposite is proper to the wicked. For as the wicked make bad use of God's good works, so on the contrary God makes good use of the evil works of wicked men. How good it is that the members of the body are so made as they could be arranged only by God the craftsman! Yet what bad use does wantonness make of the eyes! What bad use does deceit make of the tongue! Does not a false witness first slay his own soul with his tongue, and then, having destroyed himself, try to harm another? He makes bad use of the tongue, yet the tongue is not therefore evil: the tongue is God's work, but wickedness makes bad use of that good work of God. How do those use their feet who run to crimes? How do murderers use their hands? And what bad use do the wicked make of those good creatures of God that lie outside them? With gold they corrupt judgments and oppress the innocent. The wicked make bad use of this light: for by living badly they press into the service of their crimes even the light by which they see. For the wicked man, going to do something evil, wants light for himself so as not to stumble—he who has already stumbled and fallen within: what he fears in the body he has already run into in the heart. So, not to take long running through them one by one, the wicked man makes bad use of all God's good things; on the contrary, the good man makes good use of the evils of wicked men. And what is so good as the one God? Since the Lord himself said, “No one is good but the one God.” The better he is, then, the better use he makes even of our evils. What is worse than Judas? Among all who clung to the Master, among the twelve, the purse was entrusted to him, and the stewardship for the poor assigned to him: ungrateful for so great a kindness, so great an honor, he took money and lost righteousness; dead himself, he betrayed life; him whom he followed as a disciple he persecuted as an enemy. All this was Judas's evil; but the Lord made good use of his evil. He allowed himself to be betrayed, in order to redeem us. See, Judas's evil was turned to good. How many martyrs has Satan persecuted? If Satan ceased persecuting, we would not today be celebrating the so glorious crown of Saint Laurence. If, then, God makes good use even of the devil's evil works, what the wicked one does, by using badly, harms himself; it does not oppose the goodness of God. The craftsman uses him; and the great craftsman, if he did not know how to use him, would not even allow him to exist. So “one of you is a devil,” he says, “though I have chosen you twelve.” What he said, “I chose twelve,” can also be understood as referring to the fact that it is a sacred number. For the honor of that number was not taken away because one of them perished: for another was put in the place of the one who perished. The consecrated number remained, the number twelve, because they were to proclaim the Trinity throughout the whole world, that is, through the four quarters of the world: that is why three times four. So Judas cut himself off; he did not violate the number twelve: he deserted his teacher, but God appointed a successor in his place.

John 6:70 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:6 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 1:26 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God, supremely good, uses evil well, as he used Judas's betrayal for our redemption and Satan's persecution for the martyrs' crowns; the twelve remained twelve when Matthias replaced Judas.

  • John 6:70, Mark 10:18 (Luke 18:19), John 12:6, and Acts 1:26 are drawn on. Saint Laurence, deacon of Rome, was martyred in 258; the sermon was preached on his feast. The number symbolism (3 × 4 = 12) is Augustine's.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark in the digital text; stray marks in the digital text): duo­ decim elegi, ct unus → duo­ decim elegi, et unus; ErgO. Utidecim elegi diceret → Ergo undecim elegi diceret; operibus Dci; sic contra Deos → operibus Dei; sic contra Deus; Qnam bonum est membra corporis ita esse. quoniadmodum → Quam bonum est membra corporis ita esse, quemadmodum; quam male uhlur oculis? Fallacia qnam → quam male utitur oculis! Fallacia quam; lens enim ut faciat → Iens enim ut faciat; malis bominum → malis hominum; luter omnes adhærentes → Inter omnes adhærentes; perdidit jusliliam → perdidit justitiam; perse­ cutusest. Totum boc → perse­ cutus est. Totum hoc; persecutus cst? Si Satanas persequendo cessaret, hodic lam → persecutus est? Si Satanas persequendo cessaret, hodie tam; bene utitur Dcus → bene utitur Deus; illo uLjtur → illo utitur; sacratus est. numerus → sacratus est numerus; duodc­ narius → duode­ narius; Se ergo cxterminavit → Se ergo exterminavit; succes­ ' sorem.. → succes­ sorem..

Topics: Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.10 (PL 35:1619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.11PL 35:1619–1621

Hoc totum quod Dominus de carne et de san­ guine suo locutus est, et quod in ejus distributionis gratia vitam nobis promisit æternam, et quod hinc voluit intelligi manducatores et potatores carnis et sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneant et ipse in illis, et quod non intellexerunt qui non crediderunt, et quod spiritualia carnaliter sapiendo scandalizati sunt, et quod eis scandalizatis et pereuntibus, consolationi Dominus adfuit discipulis qui remanserant, ad quos probandos interrogavit, Numquid et vos vultis ire? ut responsio permansionis eorum innotesceret nobis; nam ille noverat quia manebant: hoc ergo totum ad hoc nobis valeat, dilectissimi, ut carnem Christi et sanguinem Christi non edamus tantum in Sacra­ mento, quod et multi mali; sed usque ad spiritus participationem manducemus et bibamus, ut in Do­ mini corpore tanquam membra maneamus, ut ejus spiritu vegetemur, et non scandalizemur, etiam si multi modo nobiscum manducant et bibunt tempora­ liter Sacramenta, qui habebunt in fine æterna tor­ menta. Modo enim corpus Christi mixtum est tan­ quam in area: sed novit Dominus qui sunt ejus. Si tu nosti quid trituras, quia ibi est latens massa, nec consumit trituratio quod purgatura est ventilatio; certi sumus, fratres, quia omnes qui sumus in corpore Domini, et manemus in illo, ut et ipse maneat in nobis, in hoc saeculo necesse habemus usque in finem inter malos vivere. Non inter illos dico malos, qui blasphemant Christum: rari enim jam inveniuntur qui lingua blasphemant, sed multi qui vita. Necesse est ergo ut inter illos usque in finem vivamus.

All this that the Lord said about his flesh and his blood; and that in the grace of its distribution he promised us eternal life; and that he wanted those who eat and drink his flesh and blood to be understood as those who abide in him and he in them; and that those who did not believe did not understand; and that they were scandalized by thinking carnally of spiritual things; and that, while they were scandalized and perishing, the Lord was at hand to console the disciples who had remained, whom he asked, to test them, “Do you also want to go away?”—so that the answer of their remaining might be made known to us, for he knew that they were staying: let all this, then, be of value to us, dearly beloved, to this end: that we eat the flesh of Christ and the blood of Christ not only in the sacrament, as many wicked people also do, but that we eat and drink to the point of sharing in the spirit, that we may abide as members in the Lord's body, that we may be quickened by his spirit, and that we may not be scandalized even if many now eat and drink the sacraments with us in time who will have eternal torments at the end. For now the body of Christ is mixed, as on the threshing floor: but “the Lord knows those who are his.” If you know what you are threshing—that the grain lies hidden there, and that the threshing does not consume what the winnowing is to clean—we are certain, brothers, that all of us who are in the Lord's body and abide in him, that he too may abide in us, must of necessity live among the wicked in this world until the end. I do not mean among those wicked who blaspheme Christ: for few are now found who blaspheme with the tongue, but many who do so by their life. It is necessary, then, that we live among them until the end.

John 6:67 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 3:12 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: We must eat Christ's flesh and blood not only in the sacrament, as the wicked also do, but to share in his Spirit as members of his body, which on earth remains mixed with the wicked until the end.

  • John 6:67 and 2 Tim 2:19 are quoted; the threshing floor recalls Matt 3:12. Augustine's teaching that many receive the sacrament without its benefit is translated exactly.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray mark; stray mark in the digital text; words run together in the digital text): Hoc tolum quod → Hoc totum quod; et quoa spiritualia → et quod spiritualia; vultis ire t ut → vultis ire? ut; nam Hie noverat → nam ille noverat; qui suut ejas → qui sunt ejus; nee consumit trituratio quod purgatura i est → nec consumit trituratio quod purgatura est; fdico malos → dico malos; rari enimjam → rari enim jam; Nccesse est → Necesse est.

Topics: Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.11 (PL 35:1619–1621; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

27.12PL 35:1621

Sed quid est quod ait, Qui manet in me, et ego in illo? Quid, nisi quod mar­ tyres audiebant, Qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit? Quomodo mansit in illo sanctus Laurentius, cujus hodie festa celebramus? Mansit usque ad tentationem, mansit usque ad ty­ rannicam interrogationem, mansit usque ad acerri­ mam comminationem, mansit usque ad peremptio­ nem: parum est, usque ad immanem excruciationem mansit. Non enim occisus est cito, sed cruciatus est in igne: diu vivere permissus est; imo non diu vi­ vere permissus est, sed tarde mori compulsus est. In illa ergo longa morte, in illis tormentis, quia bene manducaverat et bene biberat, tanquam illa esca sagi­ natus et illo calice ebrius, tormenta non sensit. Ibi enim erat qui dixit, Spiritus est qui vivificat. Caro enim ardebat, sed spiritus animam vegetabat. Non cessit, et in regnum successit. Dixerat autem illi Xystus martyr sanctus, cujus diem quinto ab hinc retro die celebravimus: « Noli moerere, fili. » Epi­ scopus enim erat ille, iste diaconus. « Noli mœrere, inquit; sequeris me post triduum. » Triduum autem dixit medium inter diem passionis sancti Xysti, et diem hodiernæ passionis sancti Laurentii. Triduum est medium. O consolatio! non ait, Noli moerere, fili; desinet persecutio, et securus eris: sed, Noli moerere; quo ego præcedo, tu sequeris; nec conse­ cutio tua differtur: triduum medium erit, et mecum eris. Accepit oraculum, vicit diabolum, pervenit ad triumphum.

But what is it that he says, “He who abides in me, and I in him”? What, except what the martyrs heard: “He who perseveres to the end will be saved”? How did Saint Laurence, whose feast we celebrate today, abide in him? He abode through temptation, abode through tyrannical interrogation, abode through the fiercest threats, abode through to death; that is too little: he abode through savage torture. For he was not killed quickly, but tortured in the fire; he was permitted to live long—or rather not permitted to live long, but compelled to die slowly. In that long death, then, in those torments, because he had eaten well and drunk well, as one fattened on that food and drunk with that cup, he did not feel the torments. For he was there who said, “It is the Spirit that gives life.” For the flesh was burning, but the spirit was quickening the soul. He did not yield, and he went on into the kingdom. And the holy martyr Xystus, whose day we celebrated five days ago, had said to him, “Do not grieve, my son.” For he was a bishop, the other a deacon. “Do not grieve,” he said; “you will follow me after three days.” He said “three days” for the interval between the day of the passion of Saint Xystus and the day of today's passion of Saint Laurence. Three days is the interval. O consolation! He did not say, “Do not grieve, my son; the persecution will cease and you will be safe,” but, “Do not grieve: where I go before, you will follow; nor is your following delayed: three days will be between, and you will be with me.” He received the prophecy, conquered the devil, and reached the triumph.

John 6:56 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:63 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Saint Laurence abode in Christ through slow torture by fire, strengthened by the food and cup he had received, and followed his bishop Xystus to martyrdom three days later, as Xystus had foretold.

  • John 6:56, Matt 10:22 (24:13), and John 6:63 are quoted. Xystus (Sixtus II), bishop of Rome, was martyred on 6 August 258, and his deacon Laurence on 10 August; Augustine's account of the fire and of Xystus's words follows the tradition known to him. A stray digit in the digital text is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray digit in the digital text): celebramus' Mansit → celebramus? Mansit; quia bene 1 manducaverat → quia bene manducaverat; Ibi enim crat qui dixit, Spiritus eat qui → Ibi enim erat qui dixit, Spiritus est qui; vegetabat, Non cessit → vegetabat. Non cessit; < Noli mœrere → « Noli mœrere; inter dicm passionis → inter diem passionis; desinet persecutio? et → desinet persecutio, et.

Topics: Martyrdom, Eucharist, Persecution

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 27.12 (PL 35:1621; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/27-1/#p-27-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-27-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.