The Conferences 1.1–1.13

Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).

Show

Chapter 1

1.1CSEL 13:6–8

Cum in heremo Sciti, ubi monachorum probatissimi patres et omnis commorabatur perfectio, abbatem Moysen, qui inter illos egregios flores suauius non solum actuali, uerum etiam theoretica uirtute fragrabat, institutione eius fundari cupiens expetissem una cum sancto abbate Germano (cum quo mihi ab ipso tirocinio ac rudimentis militiae spiritalis ita indiuiduum deinceps contubernium tam in coenobio quam in heremo fuit, ut cuncti ad significandam sodalitatis ac propositi nostri parilitatem pronuntiarent unam mentem atque animam duobus in corporibus), pariterque ab eodem abbate aedificationis sermonem fusis lacrimis posceremus (quippe cuius hunc animi rigorem manifestissime noueramus, ut nisi fideliter desiderantibus et cum omni cordis contritione quaerentibus nequaquam adquiesceret ianuam perfectionis aperire, ne scilicet, si passim uel nolentibus eam uel tepide sitientibus exhiberet, res necessarias et quae solis perfectionem cupientibus debent esse conpertae, indignis et fastidiose suscipientibus pandens aut iactantiae uitium aut proditionis crimen uideretur incurrere), tandem fatigatus precibus nostris ita exorsus est.

In the desert of Scetis, where the most approved fathers of the monks dwelt and all perfection had its home, I sought out Abba Moses, who among those outstanding flowers gave off the sweetest fragrance, not only in practical but also in contemplative virtue, wishing to be grounded by his instruction. I went together with the holy Abba Germanus, with whom, from the very beginning and first rudiments of spiritual warfare, I had shared so inseparable a companionship both in the coenobium and in the desert that everyone, to express the sameness of our fellowship and purpose, would say that we were one mind and one soul in two bodies. Together we asked the same abba with tears for a word of edification (for we knew very well the strictness of his mind: he would by no means consent to open the door of perfection except to those who desired it faithfully and sought it with all contrition of heart, lest, if he displayed it indiscriminately to those who did not want it or thirsted for it only lukewarmly, he should seem, by laying open necessary things, which ought to be known only to those who long for perfection, to the unworthy and to those who received them with disdain, to incur either the vice of boasting or the crime of betrayal). At last, worn down by our entreaties, he began thus.

Acts 4:32 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Cassian and Germanus, lifelong companions, come to Abba Moses in the desert of Scetis and beg him for instruction until he agrees to speak.

  • Terms used throughout the Conferences: abbas “abba” (the title of a desert elder); puritas cordis “purity of heart”; discretio “discernment”; theoria/contemplatio “contemplation”; actualis “practical” (the life of ascetic practice, as opposed to contemplation); coenobium “coenobium” (a community monastery) as distinct from the eremitic desert. “One mind and one soul” echoes Acts 4:32.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (line-break hyphen and a stray margin siglum (Be) leaked into the text): in- Be corporibus → in corporibus.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.1 (CSEL 13:6–8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.2CSEL 13:8–9

Omnes, inquit, artes ac disciplinae scopon quendam, id est destinationem, et telos, hoc est finem proprium habent, ad quem respiciens uniuscuiusque artis industrius adpetitor cunctos labores et pericula atque dispendia aequanimiter libenterque sustentat. nam et agricola nunc torridos solis radios, nunc pruinas et glaciem non declinans terram infatigabiliter scindit et indomitas agri glaebas frequenti subigit uomere, dum scopon seruat, ut eam cunctis sentibus expurgatam uniuersisque graminibus absolutam in modum solubilis harenae exercendo comminuat, finem, id est perceptionem copiosarum frugum et exuberantiam segetum non alias adepturum se esse confidens, quo uel ipse deinceps uitam securus exigere uel suam possit amplificare substantiam. referta etiam frugibus horrea libenter exhaurit easque putribus sulcis instanti labore commendat, praesentem deminutionem futurarum messium contemplatione non sentiens. illi etiam, qui negotiationum solent exercere commercia, non incertos pelagi timent casus, non ulla discrimina perhorrescunt, dum ad finem quaestus spe praepeti prouocantur. nec non etiam hi qui militiae mundialis ambitione flammantur, dum prospiciunt honorum ac potentiae finem, peregrinationum exitia ac pericula non sentiunt nec praesentibus aerumnis bellisque franguntur, dum propositum sibi dignitatis finem cupiunt obtinere. habet ergo et nostra professio scopon proprium ac finem suum, pro quo labores cunctos non solum infatigabiliter, uerum etiam gratanter inpendimus, ob quem nos ieiuniorum inedia non fatigat, uigiliarum lassitudo delectat, lectio ac meditatio scripturarum continuata non satiat, labor etiam incessabilis nuditasque et omnium rerum priuatio, horror quoque huius uastissimae solitudinis non deterret. ob quem uos ipsi procul dubio parentum spreuistis affectum et patrium solum ac delicias mundi tot pertransitis regionibus despexistis, ut ad nos homines rusticos et idiotas atque in hoc heremi squalore degentes peruenire possetis. propter quod respondete, inquit, mihi quae sit destinatio uestra uel finis, qui ad haec omnia libentissime sustinenda nos prouocat.

“All arts and disciplines,” he said, “have a certain skopos, that is, a goal, and a telos, that is, an end proper to them. Looking to it, the diligent pursuer of any art bears all labors, dangers, and losses calmly and gladly. The farmer, shrinking neither from the scorching rays of the sun nor from frost and ice, tirelessly cleaves the earth and subdues the untamed clods of the field with frequent ploughing, while he keeps his goal in view: to clear it of all briars, free it of every weed, and break it up by working it until it is like loose sand. He is confident that he will not otherwise attain his end, that is, the gathering of plentiful crops and an abundant harvest, by which he may afterwards either live free from care or increase his property. He even gladly empties his well-stocked barns of grain and entrusts it with pressing labor to the crumbling furrows, not feeling the present loss because he contemplates the harvests to come. Those too who carry on trade do not fear the uncertain chances of the sea and shrink from no dangers, while they are spurred on by swift hope toward their end, which is profit. So also those who are fired with the ambition of worldly service, while they look ahead to the end of honor and power, do not feel the ruin and dangers of travel, nor are they broken by present hardships and wars, while they long to obtain the end of rank they have set before themselves. Our profession, then, also has its own goal and its end, for which we spend all our labors not only tirelessly but even gladly. For its sake the hunger of fasting does not weary us, the fatigue of vigils delights us, continual reading and meditation on the Scriptures do not sate us, and unceasing labor, nakedness, the lack of all things, and even the horror of this vast solitude do not deter us. For its sake you yourselves, no doubt, spurned the affection of your parents, and despised your native land and the delights of the world, passing through so many regions to reach us, rustic and unlearned men living in the squalor of this desert. Therefore,” he said, “answer me: what is your goal, or your end, which spurs us to bear all these things most gladly?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses explains that every art has a goal and an end, as the farmer, merchant, and soldier show, and asks the visitors what the goal and end of the monk's life are.

  • Cassian keeps the Greek terms skopos (“goal”, glossed by destinatio) and telos (“end”, glossed by finis); the translation renders scopos/destinatio as “goal” and finis as “end” throughout this conference.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip in the digital text (refertJ, for referta, agreeing with horrea)): refertJ, → referta; solitndinis → solitudinis.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.2 (CSEL 13:8–9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.3CSEL 13:9

Et cum persisteret nostram elicere super hac interrogatione sententiam, respondimus regni caelorum causa haec cuncta tolerari.

When he insisted on drawing out our opinion on this question, we answered that all these things are endured for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.

Notes and citation

Summary: Cassian and Germanus answer that they endure everything for the kingdom of heaven.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.3 (CSEL 13:9; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.4CSEL 13:9–10

Ad quod ille: Bene, inquit: argute de fine dixistis. qui uero debeat esse scopos noster, id est destinatio, cui iugiter inhaerentes finem ualeamus adtingere, prae omnibus nosse debetis. et cum ignorationem confessi simpliciter fuissemus, adiecit: in omni ut dixi arte ac disciplina praecedit quidam scopos, id est animae destinatio siue incessabilis mentis intentio. quam nisi quis omni studio perseuerantiaque seruauerit, nec ad finem desiderati fructus poterit peruenire. nam ut dixi agricola finem habens secure copioseque uiuendi in prouentu segetum fecundarum scopon, id est destinationem gerit agrum suum cunctis sentibus expurgare eumque uniuersis infructuosis uacuare graminibus, nec aliter se quieti finis opulentiam adepturum esse confidit, nisi id, quod usu obtinere desiderat, quadam prius operis ac spei suae ratione possideat. negotiator quoque conparandarum mercium desiderium non deponit, per quod possit quaestuosius diuitias congregare, quia frustra concupisceret lucrum, nisi uiam qua ad id tenderet elegisset. et qui certis quibusque dignitatibus Mundi huius cupiunt honorari, cui se officio uel ordini debeant mancipare ante proponunt, ut per legitimum spei tramitem finem quoque ualeant desideratae dignitatis adtingere. itaque et uiae nostrae finis quidem est regnum dei. quid uero sit scopos debet diligenter inquiri: qui si nobis similiter conpertus non fuerit, frustra nitendo fatigabimur, quia sine uia tendentibus labor est itineris, non profectus. ad quod obstupescentibus nobis senex intulit: finis quidem nostrae professionis ut diximus regnum dei seu regnum caelorum est, destinatio uero, id est scopos, puritas cordis, sine qua ad illum finem inpossibile est quempiam peruenire. in hac ergo destinatione defigentes nostrae directionis obtutus uelut ad certam lineam cursum rectissimum dirigemus, ac si paululum quid ab hac cogitatio nostra deflexerit, ad contemplationem eius ilico recurrentes rursus eam uelut ad quandam normam rectissime corrigemus, quae semper omnes conatus nostros ad unum hoc reuocans signum arguet statim, si a proposita directione mens nostra uel paululum deuiauerit.

To this he said: “Good; you have spoken shrewdly about the end. But what our goal ought to be, that is, the aim to which we must cling constantly in order to reach the end, you ought to know before all else.” When we had simply confessed that we did not know, he added: “In every art and discipline, as I said, there goes before a certain skopos, that is, an aim of the soul or unceasing intention of the mind. Unless one keeps it with all zeal and perseverance, he will not be able to reach the end of the fruit he desires. For, as I said, the farmer, whose end is to live securely and plentifully on the yield of fruitful crops, has as his goal, that is, his aim, to clear his field of all briars and empty it of every unfruitful weed; and he is not confident that he will attain the abundance of the restful end unless he first possesses, by a kind of plan of work and hope, what he desires to enjoy in use. The merchant, too, does not lay aside the desire of acquiring goods by which he may gather riches more profitably, because he would long for gain in vain if he had not chosen the way by which to pursue it. And those who desire to be honored with particular ranks in this world first decide to what office or order they must commit themselves, so that by the lawful path of hope they may reach the end of the rank they desire. So too the end of our way is the kingdom of God. But what the goal is must be diligently asked; for if it is not likewise known to us, we shall wear ourselves out striving in vain, because for those who travel without a road there is the labor of the journey but no progress.” When we were astonished at this, the old man went on: “The end of our profession, as we have said, is the kingdom of God or the kingdom of heaven; but the aim, that is, the goal, is purity of heart, without which it is impossible for anyone to reach that end. Fixing the gaze of our direction on this aim, we shall direct our course most straight, as though toward a sure line; and if our thought turns aside from it even a little, we shall run back at once to the sight of it and correct it again most exactly, as by a rule. This rule, always calling all our efforts back to this one mark, will show at once if our mind has strayed even a little from the direction set before it.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses teaches that the end of the monk's life is the kingdom of God, but its immediate goal, by which every effort is measured, is purity of heart.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (foent for fuerit); OCR slip (ii for fi); stray full stop in the digital text): seopos → scopos; conpertus non foent → conpertus non fuerit; sine uia. tendentibus → sine uia tendentibus; deiigentes → defigentes.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.4 (CSEL 13:9–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.5CSEL 13:10–12

Quemadmodum hi, quibus usus est bellica tela tractandi, cum ante regem mundi huius artis suae cupiunt peritiam demonstrare, in paruissima quaedam scutula, quae depicta in se continent praemia, iacula uel sagittas intorquere contendunt, certi quod non alias nisi destinationis suae linea ad finem possint desiderati praemii peruenire, quo tum demum utique potientur, cum propositum scopon ualuerint obtinere: qui si forte ab eorum fuerit subtractus intuitu, quantumlibet a recto tramite cassa imperitorum deerret intentio, excidisse se tamen ab illius disciplinatae lineae directione non sentient, quia nullum habent certum signum quod uel peritiam directionis probet uel arguat prauitatem. et ideo cum inutiles in aera uacuumque fuderint iactus, in quo peccauerint quoue decepti sint diiudicare non possunt, quippe quos nullum accusat indicium quantum a directione discesserint, nec quo deinceps corrigere uel reuocare debeant lineam disciplinae docere potest passiuus obtutus. ita igitur et nostri propositi finis quidem secundum apostolum uita aeterna est, ita eodem pronuntiante: habentes quidem fructum uestrum in sanctificationem, finem uero uitam aeternam, scopos uero est puritas cordis, quam sanctificationem non inmerito nuncupauit, sine qua praedictus finis non poterit adprehendi, acsi dixisset aliis uerbis: habentes quidem scopon uestrum in cordis puritate, finem uero uitam aeternam. de qua destinatione docens nos idem beatus apostolus ipsum nomen, id est scopon, significanter expressit ita dicens: quae posteriora sunt obliuiscens, ad ea uero quae in ante sunt extendens me, ad destinatum persequor, ad brauium supernae uocationis domini. quod euidentius in Graeco ponitur κατὰ σκοπὸν διώκω, id est secundum destinationem persequor, tamquam si dixisset: hac destinatione qua illa quae posteriora sunt obliuiscor, id est anterioris hominis uitia, ad finem brauii caelestis peruenire contendo. quidquid ergo nos ad hunc scopon, id est puritatem cordis potest dirigere, tota uirtute sectandum est, quidquid autem ab hac retrahit, ut perniciosum ac noxium deuitandum. pro hac enim uniuersa agimus atque toleramus, pro hac parentes, patria, dignitates, diuitiae, deliciae mundi huius et uoluptas uniuersa contemnitur, ut scilicet puritas cordis perpetua retentetur. hac itaque nobis destinatione proposita semper actus nostri et cogitationes ad eam obtinendam rectissime dirigentur. quae si prae oculis nostris iugiter statuta non fuerit, non solum cunctos labores nostros uacuos pariter atque instabiles reddens in cassum eos ac sine ullo emolumento conpellet effundi, sed etiam cogitationes omnes diuersas sibique contrarias suscitabit. necesse est enim mentem quo recurrat cuiue principaliter inhaereat non habentem per singulas horas atque momenta pro incursuum uarietate mutari atque ex his quae extrinsecus accedunt in illum statum continuo transformari qui sibi primus occurrerit.

“It is like those who are practised in handling weapons of war: when they wish to show the skill of their art before a king of this world, they strive to hurl darts or arrows at very small targets on which the prizes are painted. They are certain that they cannot reach the end of the prize they desire except by the line of their aim, and they will obtain it only when they have been able to hit the goal set before them. If that goal happens to be withdrawn from their sight, however far the vain aim of the unskilled strays from the right path, they will not perceive that they have fallen away from the direction of that trained line, because they have no sure mark to prove the skill of their direction or expose its fault. And so, when they have poured out useless shots into the empty air, they cannot judge where they went wrong or how they were misled, since no sign shows them how far they have departed from the direction, and an undirected gaze cannot teach them how they ought to correct or recall the line of their discipline afterwards. So also the end of our purpose, according to the apostle, is eternal life, as he declares: ‘Having your fruit unto sanctification, and the end eternal life.’ But the goal is purity of heart, which he rightly called sanctification, without which the aforesaid end cannot be grasped; as if he had said in other words: ‘Having your goal in purity of heart, and the end eternal life.’ Teaching us about this aim, the same blessed apostle expressly used the very word, that is, skopos, saying: ‘Forgetting what is behind, and reaching out to what is ahead, I press on toward the mark, toward the prize of the heavenly calling of the Lord.’ This is put more plainly in the Greek, kata skopon diōkō, that is, ‘I press on according to the mark,’ as if he had said: ‘With this aim, by which I forget what is behind, that is, the vices of the former man, I strive to reach the end, the heavenly prize.’ Whatever, then, can direct us to this goal, that is, purity of heart, must be pursued with all our strength; whatever draws us away from it must be avoided as ruinous and harmful. For its sake we do and endure everything; for its sake parents, homeland, honors, riches, the delights of this world, and every pleasure are despised, so that purity of heart may be kept for ever. With this aim always set before us, our acts and thoughts will be directed most rightly to obtaining it. If it is not continually set before our eyes, it will not only make all our labors empty and unstable and force them to be poured out in vain and without any profit, but will also stir up all kinds of thoughts, different and contrary to one another. For a mind that has nowhere to return to and nothing to cling to principally must change every hour and moment with the variety of what assails it, and be transformed at once, by what comes to it from outside, into whatever state first presents itself.”

Rom 6:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Like archers who need a visible target, monks need purity of heart always before their eyes as the goal by which everything is judged, with eternal life as the end.

  • Rom 6:22, quoted with Cassian's reading. Phil 3:13–14 is quoted in a Latin form with “ad destinatum” (“to the mark”), and Cassian cites the Greek κατὰ σκοπὸν διώκω.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR of the Greek (z for κ, ϭ for σ, ϰ for κ, stray accent); stray letter in the digital text; stray marks splitting a word; two words joined in the digital text): directionisprobet → directionis probet; cordis puri.. tate → cordis puritate; zατὰ ϭϰοπὸν ϭ̀ιώϰω → κατὰ σκοπὸν διώκω; proaposita → proposita.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.5 (CSEL 13:10–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.6CSEL 13:12–13

Hinc namque est quod nonnullos mundi huius maximas facultates et non solum multa auri atque argenti talenta, uerum etiam praediorum magnificentiam contemnentes post haec uidimus pro scalpello, pro graphio, pro acu, pro calamo commoueri. qui si contemplationem cordis mundi fixam tenerent, numquam utique pro paruis rebus admitterent, quod ne pro magnis ac pretiosis incurrerent opibus, easdem penitus abicere maluerunt. nam et plerumque nonnulli tanto zelo codicem seruant, ut eum ne leuiter quidem legi uel contingi ab aliquo sinant, et inde occasiones inpatientiae ac mortis incurrunt, unde monentur stipendia patientiae et caritatis adquirere, cumque omnes diuitias suas pro Christi amore disperserint, pristinum tamen cordis affectum in rebus minimis retentantes et pro ipsis nonnumquam mobiliter irascentes, ueluti qui non habeant apostolicam caritatem, ex omnibus infructuosi sterilesque redduntur. quod in spiritu beatus apostolus praeuidens et si distribuero, inquit, in cibos pauperum omnes facultates meas et tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, caritatem autem non habuero, nihil mihi prodest. unde liquido conprobatur perfectionem non statim nuditate nec priuatione omnium facultatum seu dignitatum abiectione contingi, nisi fuerit caritas illa cuius apostolus membra describit, quae in sola cordis puritate consistit. nam quid est aliud non aemulari, non inflari, non inritari, non agere perperam, non quaerere quae sua sunt, non super iniquitate gaudere, non cogitare malum et reliqua, nisi cor perfectum atque mundissimum deo semper offerre et intactum a cunctis perturbationibus custodire?

“This is why we have seen some who despised the greatest wealth of this world, not only many talents of gold and silver but also magnificent estates, afterwards become agitated over a knife, a stylus, a needle, or a pen. If they held fixed the contemplation of a pure heart, they would certainly never have fallen, for small things, into what they chose to cast off altogether with their great and precious riches, so as not to fall into it for their sake. Very often some guard a book with such zeal that they will not let anyone so much as read or touch it lightly; and from the very thing by which they are admonished to gain the rewards of patience and love, they take occasions of impatience and death. And though they have given away all their riches for the love of Christ, they keep their former attachment of heart in the smallest things and sometimes become quickly angry over them; and so, as those who do not have apostolic love, they are rendered fruitless and barren in everything. The blessed apostle foresaw this in the Spirit when he said: ‘Though I distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.’ From this it is clearly proved that perfection is not reached at once by nakedness and the loss of all possessions or by casting off honors, unless there is that love whose parts the apostle describes, which consists in purity of heart alone. For what else is it not to be envious, not to be puffed up, not to be provoked, not to act wrongly, not to seek one's own, not to rejoice in iniquity, not to think evil, and the rest, than always to offer God a perfect and utterly clean heart and to keep it untouched by all disturbances?”

1 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:6 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Those who renounce great wealth but then quarrel over a pen or a book show that renunciation without love, which is purity of heart, is fruitless.

  • 1 Cor 13:3 and 13:4–6, in Cassian's Latin.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (u for n); two words joined in the digital text): qui nou habeant → qui non habeant; nihil mihi prodestunde → nihil mihi prodest. unde.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.6 (CSEL 13:12–13; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.7CSEL 13:13–14

Omnia igitur huius gratia gerenda adpetendaque sunt nobis. pro hac solitudo sectanda est, pro hac ieiunia, uigilias, labores, corporis nuditatem, lectionem ceterasque uirtutes debere nos suscipere nouerimus, ut scilicet per illas ab uniuersis passionibus noxiis inlaesum parare cor nostrum et conseruare possimus et ad perfectionem caritatis istis gradibus innitendo conscendere, et non propter has obseruantias, si forte honesta ac necessaria occupatione praeuenti sollemnitatem districtionis nostrae non potuerimus implere, incidamus in tristitiam uel iram siue indignationem, ob quae expugnanda illud quod praetermissum est fueramus acturi. non enim tantum est lucrum ieiunii quantum irae dispendium nec tantus lectione capitur fructus quantum contemptu fratris incurritur detrimentum. ea igitur quae sequentia sunt, id est ieiunia, uigiliae, anachoresis, meditatio scripturarum, propter principalem scopon, id est puritatem cordis, quod est caritas, nos conuenit exercere et non propter illa principalem hanc proturbare uirtutem, qua in nobis integra inlaesaque durante nihil oberit, si aliquid eorum quae sequentia sunt pro necessitate fuerit praetermissum: siquidem nec proderit uniuersa fecisse adempta hac qua diximus principali causa, cuius obtentu sunt omnia peragenda. ob hoc enim quis ferramenta cuiuslibet artis instituere sibimet ac praeparare festinat, non ut ea possideat otiosa nec ut emolumenti illius fructum qui speratur ex ipsis in nuda instrumentorum possessione constituat, sed ut eorum ministerio peritiam finemque illius disciplinae cuius haec adiumenta sunt efficaciter adprehendat. igitur ieiunia, uigiliae, meditatio scripturarum, nuditas ac priuatio omnium facultatum non perfectio, sed perfectionis instrumenta sunt, quia non in ipsis consistit disciplinae illius finis, sed per illa peruenitur ad finem. in cassum igitur haec exercitia molietur, quisque his uelut summo bono contentus intentionem sui cordis huc usque defixerit et non ad capiendum finem, propter quem haec adpetenda sunt, omne studium uirtutis extenderit, habens quidem disciplinae illius instrumenta, finem uero, in quo omnis fructus consistit, ignorans. quidquid igitur potest istam mentis nostrae puritatem tranquillitatemque turbare, quamuis utile ac necessarium uideatur, ut noxium deuitandum est. hac enim norma et errorum peruagationumque omnium dispersiones poterimus euadere et desideratum finem linea certae directionis adtingere.

“Everything, then, must be done and sought for the sake of this. For this solitude is to be pursued; for this we should know that we must undertake fasts, vigils, labors, bodily nakedness, reading, and the other virtues: that through them we may prepare and keep our heart unharmed by all harmful passions, and by leaning on these steps climb up to the perfection of love. And we must not, because of these observances, if perhaps we are prevented by some honorable and necessary occupation from fulfilling our customary strictness, fall into sadness or anger or indignation, the very things we were going to fight against by doing what has been left undone. For the gain from a fast is not as great as the loss from anger, nor is as much fruit gained from reading as harm is incurred by despising a brother. The things that are secondary, then, that is, fasts, vigils, withdrawal into solitude, meditation on the Scriptures, we ought to practise for the sake of the principal goal, that is, purity of heart, which is love, and not for their sake disturb this principal virtue. As long as it remains whole and unharmed in us, it will do no harm if any of the secondary things has been omitted out of necessity; whereas it will profit nothing to have done them all if this principal thing, for the sake of which everything is to be done, is taken away. For this is why someone hastens to get and prepare the tools of any art: not to have them lying idle, nor to place the profit he hopes for from them in the mere possession of the instruments, but so that by their service he may effectively grasp the skill and end of the discipline which they assist. Fasts, vigils, meditation on the Scriptures, nakedness, and the lack of all possessions are therefore not perfection but the instruments of perfection, because the end of that discipline does not consist in them, but through them one reaches the end. In vain, then, will a man labor at these exercises if he is content with them as the highest good and fixes the intention of his heart only so far, and does not extend all his zeal for virtue to grasping the end for which they are to be sought, having the instruments of the discipline but not knowing the end in which all the fruit consists. Whatever can disturb this purity and tranquillity of our mind, however useful and necessary it may seem, must be avoided as harmful. By this rule we shall be able to escape the scattering of all errors and wanderings and reach the desired end by the line of a sure direction.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Fasting, vigils, reading, and poverty are only instruments of perfection; they serve purity of heart, which is love, and must never be kept at the cost of anger or contempt for a brother.

  • anachoresis: withdrawal into solitude (the life of the anchorite).

Topics: Fasting, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.7 (CSEL 13:13–14; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.8CSEL 13:14–16

Hic ergo nobis principalis debet esse conatus, haec immobilis destinatio cordis iugiter adfectanda, ut diuinis rebus ac deo mens semper inhaereat. quidquid ab hac diuersum est, quamuis magnum, secundum tamen aut etiam infimum seu certe noxium iudicandum est. huius mentis uel actus figura etiam in euangelio per Martham et Mariam pulcherrime designatur. cum enim Martha sancto utique ministerio deseruiret, utpote quae ipsi domino eiusque discipulis ministrabat, et Maria spiritali tantummodo intenta doctrinae Iesu pedibus inhaereret, quos osculans bonae confessionis liniebat unguento, praefertur tamen a domino, quod et meliorem elegerit partem et eam quae ab ea non possit auferri. nam cum laboraret Martha pia sollicitudine ac dispensatione distenta, solam se uidens ad tantum ministerium non posse sufficere adiutorium sororis a domino postulat dicens: non tibi sedet quia soror mea reliquit me solam ministrare? dic ergo ei ut me adiuuet. utique non ad uile opus, sed ad laudabile eam ministerium prouocabat. et tamen quid audit a domino? Martha, Martha, sollicita es et turbaris erga plurima: paucis uero opus est aut etiam uno. Maria bonam partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea. uidetis ergo principale bonum in theoria sola, id est in contemplatione diuina dominum posuisse. unde ceteras uirtutes, licet necessarias et utiles bonasque pronuntiemus, secundo tamen gradu censendas esse decernimus, quia uniuersae huius unius patrantur obtentu. dicens enim dominus: sollicita es et turbaris erga multa, paucis uero opus est aut etiam uno, summum bonum non in actuali quamuis laudabili opere et multis fructibus abundanti, sed in sua contemplatione quae uere simplex et una est collocauit, paucis opus esse pronuntians ad perfectam beatitudinem, id est illa theoria quae prius in paucorum seruabatur consideratione sanctorum. a quorum contemplatione conscendens is qui adhuc in profectu positus est ad illud quoque quod unum dicitur, id est dei solius intuitum ipso adiuuante perueniet, ut scilicet etiam sanctorum actus ac ministeria mirifica supergressus solius dei iam pulchritudine scientiaque pascatur. Maria ergo bonam partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea. et hoc diligentius intuendum est. nam cum dicit Maria bonam partem elegit, licet taceat de Martha et nequaquam eam uituperare uideatur, illam tamen laudans hanc inferiorem esse pronuntiat. rursum cum dicit quae non auferetur ab ea, ostendit quod ab hac sua portio possit auferri (nec enim ministerium corporale eam homine poterit iugiter permanere), illius uero studium nullo prorsus aeuo docet posse finiri.

“This, then, must be our principal effort, and this the immovable aim of the heart to be sought continually: that the mind may always cling to divine things and to God. Whatever differs from this, however great, must be judged secondary, or even the lowest, or certainly harmful. A figure of this disposition and way of acting is beautifully shown in the Gospel in Martha and Mary. For while Martha was engaged in a service that was certainly holy, since she was serving the Lord himself and his disciples, and Mary, intent only on spiritual teaching, clung to the feet of Jesus, kissing them and anointing them with the ointment of a good confession, yet the Lord preferred her, because she had chosen the better part, and one that could not be taken from her. For when Martha, laboring with pious care and distracted by her serving, saw that she could not manage so great a service alone, she asked the Lord for her sister's help, saying: ‘Do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? Tell her then to help me.’ She was certainly calling her not to a mean task but to a praiseworthy service. And yet what does she hear from the Lord? ‘Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things; but few things are needed, or even one. Mary has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken from her.’ You see, then, that the Lord placed the principal good in theoria alone, that is, in divine contemplation. Therefore, though we declare the other virtues necessary, useful, and good, we judge that they must be ranked in the second degree, because all of them are practised for the sake of this one. For when the Lord says, ‘You are anxious and troubled about many things, but few are needed, or even one,’ he placed the highest good not in practical work, however praiseworthy and abounding in many fruits, but in contemplation of himself, which is truly simple and one. He declares that few things are needed for perfect blessedness, that is, the contemplation which is first practised in considering a few saints. Rising from contemplating them, one who is still in the course of progress will come, with God's help, to that which is called one, that is, the vision of God alone, so that, passing beyond even the wonderful acts and services of the saints, he may feed on the beauty and knowledge of God alone. ‘Mary, therefore, has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken from her.’ This must be looked at more closely. When he says, ‘Mary has chosen the good part,’ though he says nothing about Martha and does not seem to blame her at all, yet by praising the one he declares the other inferior. Again, when he says, ‘which shall not be taken from her,’ he shows that Martha's portion can be taken from her (for bodily service cannot remain with a human being for ever), but he teaches that Mary's pursuit can never come to an end in any age.”

Luke 10:39 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:42 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:3 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 7:38 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Martha and Mary show that the highest good is contemplation of God, to which all other virtues, however good, are secondary, and which alone will never be taken away.

  • Luke 10:38–42, in Cassian's Latin, which reads “few things are needed, or even one”. Mary kissing and anointing the Lord's feet combines this Mary with the anointing stories (Luke 7:38; John 12:3).
  • “eam homine” in the digital text is garbled; translated by sense (bodily service cannot remain with a human being for ever).

Topics: Prayer

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.8 (CSEL 13:14–16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.9CSEL 13:16

Ad quod nos ualde permoti: Quid ergo? diximus: labor ieiuniorum, lectionis instantia, opera misericordiae, iustitiae, pietatis et humanitatis auferentur a nobis et non permanebunt cum auctoribus suis, praesertim cum ipse dominus retributionem regni caelorum his operibus repromittat dicens: uenite benedicti patris mei, possidete paratum nobis regnum a constitutione mundi. esuriui enim et dedistis mihi manducare, sitiui et dedistis mihi bibere, et cetera? quomodo ergo auferentur haec quae introducunt factores suos in regnum caelorum?.

Deeply moved at this, we said: “What then? Will the labor of fasting, diligence in reading, and works of mercy, justice, piety, and kindness be taken from us and not remain with those who do them? Especially since the Lord himself promises the reward of the kingdom of heaven to these works, saying: ‘Come, you blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me to drink,’ and the rest. How then will these things be taken away which bring those who do them into the kingdom of heaven?”

Matt 25:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:35 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Germanus and Cassian object that works of mercy cannot be taken away, since Christ rewards them with the kingdom.

  • Matt 25:34–35.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (o for u)): permanebunt com auctoribus → permanebunt cum auctoribus.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.9 (CSEL 13:16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.10CSEL 13:16–18

MOYSES: Nec ego dixi mercedem boni operis auferendam dicente eodem domino: qui potum dederit uni ex minimis istis calicem aquae frigidae tantum in nomine discipuli, amen dico nobis, non perdet mercedem suam, sed actionem dico, quam uel necessitas corporalis uel inpugnatio carnis seu mundi huius inaequalitas administrari exigit, auferendam. nam lectionis instantia uel ieiuniorum adflictio ad emundationem cordis et castigationem carnis in praesenti tantummodo utiliter exercentur, donec caro concupiscit aduersus spiritum. quae nonnumquam ab his, qui labore nimio seu aegritudine corporis senioue defessi sunt, etiam in praesenti uidemus auferri nec ab homine posse iugiter exerceri. quanto magis ergo haec in futuro cessabunt, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem corpusque istud quod nunc animale est surrexerit spiritale et coeperit caro non esse iam talis ut aduersus spiritum concupiscat. de quibus etiam beatus apostolus manifeste pronuntiat corporalis, inquiens, exercitatio ad modicum utilis est: pietas autem (quae sine dubio caritas intellegitur) ad omnia utilis est, promissionem habens uitae quae nunc est et futurae. quae ergo dicitur ad modicum esse utilis, manifeste pronuntiatur nec per omne tempus exerceri nec summam perfectionis per se solam laboranti posse conferre. modicam quippe ad utrumque referri potest, id est uel ad breuitatem temporis, quod scilicet homini tam in praesenti quam in futuro exercitatio corporalis coaeterna esse non possit, uel certe ad paruitatem utilitatis quae de carnali exercitatione conquiritur, eo quod adflictio corporalis initia quaedam profectus, non ipsam perfectionem pariat caritatis, quae promissionem habet uitae praesentis et futurae. et idcirco exercitia eorum praedictorum necessaria esse censemus, quia sine ipsis ad caritatis fastigia non possit ascendi. haec etiam quae dicitis opera pietatis ac misericordiae necessaria sunt in hoc tempore, dum adhuc inaequalis diuersitas dominatur: quorum ne hic quidem expectaretur operatio, nisi inopum, indigentum infirmorumque pars maxima redundaret, quae iniquitate hominum facta est, eorum scilicet, qui ea quae omnibus a communi creatore concessa sunt in suos tantum occupata usus nec tamen utenda tenuerunt. donec ergo in hoc mundo inaequalitas ista grassatur, erit haec actio necessaria et utilis exercenti, restituens quidem bono affectui et piae uoluntati retributionem hereditatis aeternae: ipsa uero in futuro saeculo parilitate regnante cessabit, cum iam non fuerit inaequalitas propter quam haec debeant exerceri, sed cuncti ab hac multiplici, id est actuali operatione ad caritatem dei et diuinarum rerum contemplationem perpetua cordis puritate transibunt. cui se hi, quibus cura est uel scientiae uel emundationi mentis insistere, iam in hoc saeculo constituti elegerunt omni conatu ac uiribus mancipare, illi scilicet semet ipsos officio adhuc in carne corruptionis positi deputantes, in quo erunt corruptione deposita permansuri, peruenientes ad illam promissionem domini saluatoris qua dicitur: beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt.

Moses: “I did not say that the reward of a good work will be taken away, for the same Lord says: ‘Whoever gives one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, truly I say to you, he shall not lose his reward.’ But I say that the activity itself will be taken away, which bodily necessity, or the assault of the flesh, or the inequality of this world requires to be carried out. For diligence in reading and the affliction of fasting are usefully practised only in the present, for cleansing the heart and chastening the flesh, while ‘the flesh lusts against the spirit.’ We see that even in the present they are sometimes taken away from those worn out by excessive labor, bodily illness, or old age, and that a person cannot practise them continually. How much more will they cease in the future, when ‘this corruptible has put on incorruption’ and this body which is now ‘natural’ has risen ‘spiritual’, and the flesh has begun to be no longer such as to lust against the spirit. Of these things the blessed apostle also plainly declares: ‘Bodily exercise is profitable for a little; but godliness’ (which is certainly to be understood as love) ‘is profitable for all things, having the promise of the life that now is and of that which is to come.’ What is said to be profitable for a little is plainly declared neither to be practised for all time nor able by itself to give the laborer the summit of perfection. ‘A little’ can refer to either: to the shortness of time, since bodily exercise cannot last for ever with a man both in the present and in the future; or else to the smallness of the profit gained from exercising the flesh, since bodily affliction brings about certain beginnings of progress, not the very perfection of love, which has the promise of the present life and of the future. And therefore we judge the exercises we have mentioned to be necessary, because without them one cannot climb to the heights of love. These works of piety and mercy you speak of are also necessary in this time, while unequal differences still prevail. Their exercise would not be expected even here if there were not an overwhelming number of the poor, the needy, and the sick, brought about by the wickedness of men: of those, namely, who seized for their own use alone what was granted to all by the common Creator, and yet did not use it. So as long as this inequality rages in the world, this activity will be necessary and useful to the one who does it, repaying a good disposition and a godly will with the reward of the eternal inheritance. But it will itself cease in the world to come, when equality reigns, since there will no longer be the inequality for which it must be done; all will pass from this manifold, that is, practical activity to the love of God and the contemplation of divine things in perpetual purity of heart. To this, those who care to devote themselves either to knowledge or to cleansing of the mind have already chosen, while still in this world, to give themselves with all their effort and strength, assigning themselves, while still in corruptible flesh, to that office in which they will remain when corruption is laid aside, and reaching the promise of the Lord and Savior in which it is said: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’”

Matt 10:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:44 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Tim 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses answers that the reward of good works remains, but the works themselves, which exist because of bodily need and human inequality, will cease, while love and contemplation continue for ever.

  • Matt 10:42; Gal 5:17; 1 Cor 15:53, 44; 1 Tim 4:8 (with Cassian's gloss that godliness means love); Matt 5:8.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (aeram for eorum); OCR slip (rn for u); OCR slip in the speaker's name (V for Y); two words joined in the digital text): MOVSES → MOYSES; pietasautem → pietas autem; exercitia aeram → exercitia eorum; infirmoramque → infirmorumque; corrnptionis → corruptionis.

Topics: Ethics, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.10 (CSEL 13:16–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.11CSEL 13:18

Et quid miramini si illa officia superius conprehensa transibunt, cum sanctus apostolus etiam sublimiora spiritus sancti charismata transitura describat, solam uero caritatem designet sine fine mansuram siue, inquiens, prophetiae euacuabuntur: siue linguae, cessabunt: siue scientia, destruetur, de hac autem: caritas numquam excidit omnia namque dona pro usu ac necessitate tribuuntur ad tempus, consummata dispensatione mox procul dubio transitura, caritas uero nullo intercipietur tempore. non solum enim in praesenti mundo utiliter operatur in nobis, sed etiam in futuro sarcina corporeae necessitatis abiecta efficacior multo atque excellentior permanebit, nullo umquam corrumpenda defectu, sed per incorruptionem perpetuam flagrantius deo atque intentius adhaesura.

“And why are you surprised that those duties mentioned above will pass away, when the holy apostle describes even the higher gifts of the Holy Spirit as passing away, and marks out love alone as remaining without end? ‘Whether there be prophecies,’ he says, ‘they shall be done away; whether tongues, they shall cease; whether knowledge, it shall be destroyed’; but of love: ‘Love never fails.’ For all gifts are given for a time, for use and need, and will surely pass away as soon as the dispensation is completed; but love will be cut off by no time. For it not only works usefully in us in the present world, but in the future too, when the burden of bodily need has been cast off, it will remain far more effective and excellent, never to be spoiled by any failing, but through perpetual incorruption clinging to God more ardently and more intently.”

1 Cor 13:8 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Even the higher spiritual gifts will pass away, but love never fails and will cling to God more intensely in the age to come.

  • 1 Cor 13:8.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (e for o); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (n for u) and stray full stop): sine, inquiens, prophetiae. → siue, inquiens, prophetiae; sine linguae → siue linguae; nen solum → non solum.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.11 (CSEL 13:18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.12CSEL 13:18

GERMANVS: Quis ergo potest fragili carne circumdatus ita esse huic theoriae semper adfixus, ut numquam cogitet de fratris aduentu, de uisitatione infirmi, de opere manuum, certe de humanitate peregrinis uel aduenientibus exhibenda? postremo quis non interpelletur corporis ipsius prouisione uel cura? aut quemadmodum mens uel in quo illi inuisibili et inconprehensibili deo ualeat cohaerere, cupimus edoceri.

Germanus: “Who then, surrounded by frail flesh, can be so fixed on this contemplation that he never thinks of a brother's arrival, of visiting the sick, of the work of his hands, or at any rate of the kindness to be shown to strangers and visitors? Finally, who is not interrupted by providing for and caring for the body itself? We want to be taught how, and in what, the mind can cling to that invisible and incomprehensible God.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Germanus asks how anyone in the flesh can remain constantly fixed on contemplation of the invisible God.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the speaker's name (B for R)): GEBMANVS → GERMANVS.

Topics: Prayer

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.12 (CSEL 13:18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.13CSEL 13:18–21

MOVSES: Inhaerere quidem deo iugiter et contemplationi eius quemadmodum dicitis inseparabiliter copulari inpossibile est homini ista carnis fragilitate circumdato. uerum oportet nos scire ubi nostrae mentis intentionem debeamus habere defixam et ad quam destinationem semper animae nostrae reuocemus intuitum: quam cum potuerit obtinere mens, gaudeat et a qua distractam se doleat atque suspiret totiensque se a summo bono sentiat reccidisse, quotiens se ab illo intuitu deprehenderit separatam, fornicationem iudicans uel momentaneum a Christi contemplatione discessum. a quo cum deuiauerit paululum noster obtutus, rursus ad eum cordis oculos retorquentes uelut rectissima linea mentis aciem reuocemus. totum namque in animae consistit recessu, unde expulso diabolo ac nequaquam in ea iam regnantibus uitiis consequenter regnum dei fundatur in nobis dicente euangelista: regnum dei non ueniet cum obseruatione, neque dicent: ecce hic aut ecce illic est: amen enim dico uobis quia regnum dei intra nos est. intra nos uero nihil aliud esse potest quam scientia, ant ignoratio ueritatis et uel uitiorum amicitia uel uirtutum, per quae aut diabolo aut Christo regnum paramus in corde. cuius etiam regni qualitatem describit apostolus ita dicens: non enim regnum dei est esca et potus, sed iustitia et pax et gaudium in spiritu sancto. itaque si regnum dei intra nos est et ipsum regnum dei iustitia et pax et gaudium est, ergo qui in istis commoratur sine dubio in regno dei est, et e contrario illi qui in iniustitia et discordia et tristitia mortem operante uersantur, in regno diaboli et in inferno ac morte sunt constituti. his enim indiciis uel dei uel diaboli discernitur regnum. et re uera si sublimi mentis intuitu consideremus statum illum, in quo degunt caelestes supernaeque uirtutes quae uere in regno dei sunt, qui alius esse credendus est quam perpetua iugisque laetitia? quid enim tam proprium uerae beatitudini tamque conueniens quam tranquillitas iugis et gaudium sempiternum? et ut hoc ipsum quod dicimus ita esse non mea coniectura, sed ipsius domini auctoritate certius instruaris, audi eum qualitatem et statum mundi illius apertissime describentem: ecce, inquit, ego creo caelos nouos, et terram nonam: et non erunt in memoria priora, neque ascendent super cor. sed gaudebitis et exultabitis usque in sempiternum in his, quae ego creo. et rursum: gaudium et laetitia inuenietur in ea, gratiarum actio et uox laudis. et erit mensis ex mense, et sabbatum ex sabbato. et iterum: gaudium et laetitiam obtinebunt, fugiet dolor et gemitus. et si adhuc clarius de illa conuersatione et ciuitate sanctorum uultis agnoscere, adtendite quae ad ipsam Hierusalem uoce domini dirigantur: et ponam, inquit, uisitationem tuam pacem, et praepositos tuos iustitiam. non audietur ultra iniquitas in terra tua, uastitas et contritio in terminis tuis, et occupabit salus muros tuos, et portas tuas laudatio. non erit tibi amplius sol ad lucendum per diem, nec splendor lunae inluminabit te: sed erit tibi dominus in lucem sempiternam, et deus tuus in gloriam tuam. non occidet ultra sol tuus, et luna tua non minuetur: sed erit dominus in lucem sempiternam, et conplebuntur dies luctus tui. et idcirco beatus apostolus non generaliter neque simpliciter omne gaudium regnum dei esse pronuntiat, sed signanter ac specialiter illud solum quod in spiritu sancto est. nouit enim esse aliud quoque uituperabile gaudium, de quo dicitur: mundus iste gaudebit, et: uae uobis qui ridetis, quia plorabitis. regnum sane caelorum tripliciter accipiendum est: aut quod regnaturi sint caeli, id est sancti in aliis subditis secundum illud: esto tu super quinque ciuitates, et tu super decem, illudque quod dicitur ad discipulos: sedebitis super sedes duodecim iudicantes duodecim tribus Israhel, ant quod ipsi caeli incipiant a Christo regnari, cum scilicet omnibus ei subiectis coeperit esse omnia in omnibus deus, uel certe quod sancti in caelis sint cum domino regnaturi.

Moses: “To cling to God continually and to be joined inseparably to contemplation of him, as you say, is impossible for a human being surrounded by this frailty of the flesh. But we ought to know where we should keep the intention of our mind fixed, and to what aim we should always recall the gaze of our soul. When the mind has been able to keep it, let it rejoice; when it is drawn away from it, let it grieve and sigh, and feel that it has fallen from the highest good as often as it finds itself separated from that gaze, judging even a momentary departure from the contemplation of Christ to be sexual immorality. When our gaze has strayed from him even a little, let us turn the eyes of the heart back to him and recall the mind's sight as by a perfectly straight line. For everything depends on the inner recess of the soul: when the devil has been driven out of it and vices no longer reign there, the kingdom of God is consequently founded in us, as the evangelist says: ‘The kingdom of God will not come with observation, nor will they say, Look, here it is, or, Look, there it is; for truly I say to you that the kingdom of God is within you.’ But within us there can be nothing else than knowledge or ignorance of the truth, and love either of the vices or of the virtues, by which we prepare a kingdom in the heart either for the devil or for Christ. The apostle also describes the character of this kingdom, saying: ‘For the kingdom of God is not food and drink, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.’ So, if the kingdom of God is within us, and the kingdom of God itself is righteousness and peace and joy, then whoever dwells in these is without doubt in the kingdom of God; and, on the contrary, those who live in unrighteousness and discord and the sadness that works death are placed in the kingdom of the devil, and in hell and death. For by these signs the kingdom either of God or of the devil is distinguished. And indeed, if we consider with the lofty gaze of the mind the state in which the heavenly and supernal powers live, who are truly in the kingdom of God, what else should we believe it to be than perpetual and unbroken gladness? For what is so proper to true blessedness, and so fitting to it, as unbroken tranquillity and everlasting joy? And so that you may be more surely taught that what we say is so, not by my conjecture but by the authority of the Lord himself, hear him describe most plainly the character and state of that world: ‘Behold,’ he says, ‘I create new heavens and a new earth; and the former things shall not be remembered, nor shall they come up upon the heart. But you shall rejoice and exult for ever in the things which I create.’ And again: ‘Joy and gladness shall be found in it, thanksgiving and the voice of praise. And it shall be month after month, and sabbath after sabbath.’ And again: ‘They shall obtain joy and gladness; sorrow and sighing shall flee away.’ And if you want to know still more clearly about that life and city of the saints, attend to what is addressed by the Lord's voice to Jerusalem itself: ‘I will make your visitation peace, and your overseers righteousness. Iniquity shall no more be heard in your land, nor devastation and destruction within your borders; salvation shall take possession of your walls, and praise of your gates. You shall no more have the sun to give light by day, nor shall the brightness of the moon give you light; but the Lord shall be to you an everlasting light, and your God for your glory. Your sun shall no more go down, and your moon shall not wane; but the Lord shall be an everlasting light, and the days of your mourning shall be ended.’ And therefore the blessed apostle does not declare generally or simply that every joy is the kingdom of God, but pointedly and specifically only that which is in the Holy Spirit. For he knew there is also another, blameworthy joy, of which it is said, ‘This world shall rejoice,’ and, ‘Woe to you who laugh, for you shall weep.’ The kingdom of heaven, indeed, is to be understood in three ways: either that the heavens, that is, the saints, will reign over others made subject to them, according to the words, ‘Be over five cities,’ and ‘you over ten,’ and what is said to the disciples, ‘You shall sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel’; or that the heavens themselves begin to be reigned over by Christ, when all things have been made subject to him and God has begun to be all in all; or else that the saints will reign with the Lord in heaven.”

Luke 17:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 14:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 65:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 65:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 51:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 35:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 60:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 60:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 60:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 60:20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 6:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 19:17 (quotation, medium confidence) · Luke 19:19 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 19:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Constant contemplation is impossible in the flesh, but the mind must keep returning to God; the kingdom of God is within, as righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.

  • “Sexual immorality” (fornicatio) is used figuratively here, of the soul's unfaithfulness to God, as in the prophets.
  • Luke 17:20–21; Rom 14:17; Isa 65:17–18; Isa 51:3 with 66:23; Isa 35:10 (or 51:11); Isa 60:17–20; John 16:20; Luke 6:25; Luke 19:17–19; Matt 19:28; 1 Cor 15:28.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (J and I for l); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (stray letter and space); stray full stop in the digital text; two words joined in the digital text): ab illo intuitu. deprehenderit → ab illo intuitu deprehenderit; deuiaaerit → deuiauerit; leiorquentes → retorquentes; diar bolo → diabolo; eeoe illic → ecce illic; cuins etiam → cuius etiam; bia enim → his enim; etrursum → et rursum; etoccupabit → et occupabit; ngnatori → regnaturi; iJIud → illud.

Topics: Prayer, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.13 (CSEL 13:18–21; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-1/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).