The Conferences 11.1–11.15
Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).
Chapter 11
11.1CSEL 13:313
Cum in coenobio Syriae consistentes post prima fidei rudimenta succedentibus aliquatenus incrementis maiorem perfectionis desiderare gratiam coepissemus, statuimus confestim Aegyptum petere ac remotissima etiam Thebaidos heremo penetrata sanctorum plurimos, quorum gloriam fama per uniuersa diffuderat, si non aemulandi, saltim agnoscendi studio inuisere. igitur ad oppidum Aegypti, cui Thennesus nomen est, emensa nauigatione peruenimus. cuius accolae ita uel mari uel stagnis salsis undique circumluuntur, ut solis, quia terra deest, negotiationibus dediti opes atque substantiam nauali conmercio parent, ita ut aedificiis cum uoluerint extruendis terra non suppetat, nisi de longinquo nauigiis adportetur.
When we were living in a coenobium in Syria, after the first rudiments of the faith, and with some growth following, we had begun to long for a greater grace of perfection, we resolved at once to go to Egypt and, penetrating even the most remote desert of the Thebaid, to visit very many of the saints whose fame had spread everywhere, from a desire, if not to imitate them, at least to know them. So we came by sea to a town of Egypt called Thennesus. Its inhabitants are so surrounded on every side either by the sea or by salt lagoons that, since there is no land, they give themselves only to trade and gain their wealth and livelihood by commerce by ship; so much so that when they want to put up buildings there is no earth available unless it is brought by boat from far away.
Notes and citation
Summary: Cassian and Germanus leave their Syrian monastery for Egypt and arrive by sea at Thennesus, a town surrounded by sea and salt marsh.
- This is the opening of the second set of Conferences (11–17), set among the elders of the Nile delta near Panephysis. The dedicatory preface to this set is not part of the digital text used here. Earlier the coenobium is placed at Bethlehem (11.5).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray period in the digital text): fama. per → fama per; ciroumlunntur → circumluuntur.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.1 (CSEL 13:313; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.2CSEL 13:313–315
Vbi cum aduenientibus nobis fauens desideriis nostris diuinitas beatissimi atque praecipui uiri Archebi episcopi praestitisset aduentum, qui raptus de anachoretarum coetu et episcopus Panephysi oppido datus tanta districtione omni aeuo suo propositum solitudinis custodiuit, ut nihil de praeteritae humilitatis tenore laxauerit aut de adiecto sibi honore blanditus sit (non enim tamquam idoneum se ad istud officium testabatur adscitum, sed ut indignum ab illa anachoreseos disciplina querebatur expulsum, eo quod triginta et septem annis in eadem conmoratus ad puritatem tantae professionis nequaquam peruenire potuisset): hic igitur cum in supra dicta Thenneso, quo eum eligendi illic episcopi causa perduxerat, pie nos atque humanissime suscepisset, agnito desiderio nostro, quo sanctos patres etiam in ulterioribus Aegypti partibus inquirere desiderabamus: uenite, inquit, uidete interim senes haud longe a nostro monasterio consistentes, quorum ita et antiquitas in corporibus iam curuatis et sanctitas in ipso etiam fulget aspectu, ut uel sola contemplatio eorum magnam intuentibus possit conferre doctrinam: a quibus id, quod ego amissum doleo quodque tradere iam perditum nequeo, non tam uerbis quam ipso sanctae uitae discatis exemplo. credo autem inopiam meam hoc studio aliquatenus subleuandam, si inquirentibus uobis illam euangelicam margaritam, quam ipse non habeo, saltim prouidero ubi eam conmodius conparetis.
When we arrived there, God, favoring our desires, brought about the arrival of the most blessed and eminent man, Bishop Archebius. He had been snatched from the company of the anchorites and given as bishop to the town of Panephysis, and he kept his purpose of solitude with such strictness all his life that he relaxed nothing of the course of his former humility and was not flattered by the honor added to him. For he did not testify that he had been called to that office as one fit for it, but lamented that he had been driven out of the discipline of the anchoritic life as unworthy, because, though he had stayed in it for thirty-seven years, he had by no means been able to reach the purity of so great a profession. When he had received us devoutly and most kindly in the said Thennesus, where the business of electing a bishop there had brought him, and learned of our desire to seek out the holy fathers even in the further parts of Egypt, he said: “Come, see meanwhile the old men who live not far from our monastery. Their age shines out in their bodies, now bent, and their holiness in their very appearance, so that even the sight of them alone can give great teaching to those who see them. From them you may learn, not so much by words as by the very example of a holy life, what I grieve that I have lost and, having lost it, can no longer hand on. But I believe my poverty will be somewhat relieved by this effort, if, when you are seeking that gospel pearl which I myself do not have, I at least provide where you may more readily buy it.”
Matt 13:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 13:46 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Bishop Archebius of Panephysis, a former anchorite who counted himself unworthy of the desert, receives them and offers to lead them to holy elders nearby.
- Matt 13:45–46 (the pearl).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (o for u)): blanditos → blanditus.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.2 (CSEL 13:313–315; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.3CSEL 13:315–316
Sumpto itaque baculo et pera, ut illic cunctis uiam ingredientibus monachis moris est, ad ciuitatem nos suam, id est Fanephysin itineris dux ipse perduxit: cuius terras, immo etiam contiguae regionis plurimam partem quondam opulentissimam (siquidem ex ea cuncta, ut fama est, in regios cibos subministrabantur) repentino terrae motu excussum mare transgressis limitibus occupauit atque ita conlapsis fere omnibus uicis opimas olim terras salsis paludibus supertexit, ut illud quod in psalmo spiritaliter decantatur: posuit flumina in desertum: et exitus aquarum in sitim. terram fructiferam in salsuginem, a malitia habitantium in ea, secundum litteram de illa putent regione praedictum. in his igitur locis multa in hunc modum oppida eminentioribus tumulis collocata fugatis habitatoribus suis eluuies illa uelut insulas fecit, quae desideratam secedentibus sanctis solitudinem praebent, in quibus tres senes, id est Chaeremon, Nesteros et Ioseph, anachoretae antiquissimi consistebant.
So, taking a staff and a wallet, as is the custom there for all monks setting out on a journey, he himself led us as guide of the way to his own city, that is, Panephysis. Its lands, and indeed most of the neighboring region, once very rich (for, as it is said, everything for the royal table was supplied from it), had been overrun by the sea, which a sudden earthquake had driven out beyond its bounds; and so, almost all the villages having collapsed, it covered lands once fertile with salt marshes, so that people think that what is sung spiritually in the psalm, “He turned rivers into a desert, and springs of water into thirst, a fruitful land into saltness, for the wickedness of those who dwell in it,” was foretold literally of that region. In these places, then, many towns set on higher mounds, their inhabitants driven away, were in this way made into islands by that flood, and they offer the solitude the saints desire in their withdrawal. In them lived three elders, anchorites of great age: Chaeremon, Nesteros, and Joseph.
Ps 107:33 (106:33 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 107:34 (106:34 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Archebius leads them to Panephysis, whose once fertile land an earthquake had turned into salt marsh, leaving island mounds where the aged anchorites Chaeremon, Nesteros, and Joseph lived.
- Ps 107:33–34 (LXX 106:33–34).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (n for u)): at illic → ut illic; at illud quod → ut illud quod; mnlta → multa.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.3 (CSEL 13:315–316; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.4CSEL 13:316–317
Itaque beatus Archebius primum nos perducere ad Chaeremonem maluit, quia et monasterio eius propior et duobus aliis prouectior esset aetate. nam cum centenarium uitae annum spiritu tantum alacer excessisset, ita dorsum eius temporis fuerat uetustate atque orationum iugitate curuatum, ut quasi in primaeuam redactus infantiam submissis ac protentis terra tenus manibus progrederetur. huius igitur et uultum mirabilem et incessum pariter intuentes (siquidem defectis mortificatisque iam omnibus membris nequaquam censuram praeteritae districtionis amiserat) cum sermonem atque doctrinam suppliciter posceremus ac desiderium tantum spiritalium institutionum causam fuisse aduentus nostri protestaremur, grauiter ille suspirans: quid uobis, ait, possum conferre doctrinae, cui inbecillitas senectutis ut rigorem pristinum relaxauit, ita loquendi quoque ademit fiduciam? quemadmodum enim docere praesumam quod ipse non facio, aut alium in eo instruam quod me iam uel minus uel tepidius exercere cognosco? ob quam rem nullum iuniorum mihi in hanc usque aetatem cohabitare permisi, ne exemplo meo alterius districtio relaxetur. numquam enim erit efficax instituentis auctoritas, nisi eam effectu operis sui cordi adfixerit audientis.
So blessed Archebius chose to take us first to Chaeremon, because he was both nearer to his monastery and older than the other two. For he had passed the hundredth year of his life, eager only in spirit, and his back had been so bent by length of years and constancy in prayer that, as if returned to earliest infancy, he went about with his hands let down and stretched out to the ground. Looking at both his wonderful face and his gait (for though all his limbs were now weakened and deadened, he had by no means lost the rigor of his former strictness), we humbly asked him for a word of teaching, declaring that the desire for spiritual instruction alone had been the reason for our coming. Sighing heavily he said: “What teaching can I give you, when the weakness of old age, as it has slackened my former rigor, has also taken away my confidence in speaking? For how should I presume to teach what I myself do not do, or instruct another in what I know I now practise either less or more coldly? For that reason I have not allowed any of the younger men to live with me up to this age, lest another’s strictness be relaxed by my example. For the authority of one who teaches will never be effective unless he fixes it in the hearer’s heart by the effect of his own practice.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The centenarian Chaeremon, bent double with age and prayer, at first refuses to teach, saying one should not teach what one no longer practises.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for c); stray period in the digital text): Arehebius → Archebius; iagitate → iugitate; tantum. spiritalium → tantum spiritalium.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.4 (CSEL 13:316–317; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.5CSEL 13:317
Ad haec nos non mediocri confusione conpuncti ita respondimus: Licet sufficere nobis ad omnem instructionem debeat uel loci istius difficultas uel ipsa etiam solitaria adhuc uita, quam iuuentas quoque robusta uix tolerat, quae nos etiam te tacente satis abundeque instruunt atque conpungunt, rogamus tamen ut taciturnitate paululum praetermissa ea nobis potius dignanter infundas, per quae hanc quam uidemus in te uirtutem non tam imitatione conplecti quam admiratione possimus. nam etiamsi reuelatus tibi tepor noster inpetrare id quod expetimus non meretur, debet hoc saltim labor tanti itineris obtinere, quo huc de Bethleemitici coenobii rudimentis institutionis uestrae desiderio et profectus nostri amore properauimus.
Pierced with no small confusion at this, we answered: “Although the hardness of this place, or the solitary life itself, which even robust youth can hardly endure, should be enough for all our instruction, and these teach us and pierce us quite abundantly even if you are silent, we nevertheless ask you to set aside your silence a little and kindly pour into us those things by which we may embrace the virtue we see in you, not so much by imitation as by admiration. For even if our lukewarmness, revealed to you, does not deserve to obtain what we ask, at least the labor of so long a journey should obtain it, by which we have hurried here from the rudiments of the coenobium at Bethlehem, out of desire for your instruction and love of our own progress.”
Notes and citation
Summary: They press Chaeremon to speak, pleading the length of their journey from their monastery in Bethlehem.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.5 (CSEL 13:317; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.6CSEL 13:317–318
Tunc beatus CHAEREMON: Tria sunt, inquit, quae faciunt homines a uitiis temperare, id est aut metus gehennae siue praesentium legum aut spes atque desiderium regni caelorum aut affectus boni ipsius amorque uirtutum. nam timor ita mali contagium legitur exsecrari: timor domini odit malitiam. spes etiam uitiorum omnium excludit incursum: non enim delinquent omnes qui sperant in eum. amor quoque ruinam non metuit peccatorum, quia caritas numquam cadit, et iterum: caritas operit multitudinem peccatorum. et idcirco beatus apostolus omnem salutis summam in istarum trium uirtutum consummatione concludens nunc, inquit, manet fides, spes, caritas, tria haec. fides namque est quae futuri iudicii ac suppliciorum metu uitiorum facit contagia declinari, spes quae mentem nostram de praesentibus auocans uniuersas corporis uoluptates caelestium praemiorum expectatione contemnit, caritas quae nos ad amorem Christi et spiritalium uirtutum fructum mentis ardore succendens, quidquid illis contrarium est, toto facit odio detestari. quae tria licet ad unum finem tendere uideantur (prouocant enim nos a rebus inlicitis abstinere), magnis tamen excellentiae suae gradibus ab inuicem disparantur. duo namque superiora proprie hominum sunt eorum qui ad profectum tendentes necdum affectum concepere uirtutum, tertium specialiter dei est et eorum qui in sese imaginem dei ac similitudinem receperunt. ille namque solus ea quae bona sunt nullo metu, nulla remunerationis gratia prouocante, sed solo bonitatis operatur affectu. omnia enim, ut ait Salomon, operatus est dominus propter semet ipsum. suae namque bonitatis obtentu omnem bonorum copiam dignis indignisque largitur, quia nec fatigari iniuriis potest nec iniquitatibus hominum passibiliter permoueri, semper scilicet manens perfecta bonitas inmutabilisque natura.
Then blessed Chaeremon said: “There are three things that make people refrain from vices: either the fear of hell or of present laws, or the hope and desire of the kingdom of heaven, or the disposition toward goodness itself and the love of the virtues. For we read that fear abhors the contagion of evil: “The fear of the Lord hates evil.” Hope too shuts out the assault of all vices: “For none who hope in him will offend.” Love also does not fear the fall of sins, since “love never fails,” and again: “Love covers a multitude of sins.” And therefore the blessed apostle, including the whole sum of salvation in the perfection of these three virtues, says: “Now there remain faith, hope, love, these three.” For it is faith that makes us avoid the contagion of vices through fear of the judgment to come and its punishments; hope that, calling our mind away from present things, despises all the pleasures of the body in expectation of heavenly rewards; love that, kindling us with ardor of mind to the love of Christ and the fruit of the spiritual virtues, makes us detest with complete hatred whatever is contrary to them. Although these three seem to tend to one end (for they urge us to abstain from unlawful things), yet they differ from one another by great degrees of excellence. For the two former belong properly to those people who, tending toward progress, have not yet acquired the disposition of the virtues; the third belongs especially to God and to those who have received into themselves the image and likeness of God. For he alone does what is good with no fear and no reward urging him, but solely from the disposition of goodness. For, as Solomon says, “The Lord has made all things for himself.” For by reason of his goodness he bestows all abundance of good things on worthy and unworthy alike, since he can neither be wearied by injuries nor moved in his feelings by the iniquities of men, remaining always perfect goodness and unchangeable nature.
Prov 8:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 34:22 (33:23 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 16:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chaeremon teaches that people refrain from sin through fear of punishment, hope of reward, or love of goodness itself; the third belongs to God and to those who bear his image.
- Prov 8:13; Ps 34:22 (LXX 33:23); 1 Cor 13:8; 1 Pet 4:8; 1 Cor 13:13; Prov 16:4; Gen 1:26. Chaeremon links fear with faith, hope with hope, and love with love.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.6 (CSEL 13:317–318; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.7CSEL 13:318–320
Si quis igitur ad perfectionem tendit, de illo primo timoris gradu quem proprie diximus esse seruilem, de quo dicitur: cum omnia feceritis, dicite: quia serui inutiles sumus, ad altiorem spei tramitem gradu proficiente conscendet, qui iam non seruo, sed mercennario conparatur, quia mercedem retributionis expectat et quasi de peccatorum absolutione et poenali timore securus ac bonorum sibi operum conscius, licet placiti praemium uideatur expetere, tamen ad affectum illum filii, qui de paternae indulgentiae liberalitate confidens omnia quae patris sunt sua esse non ambigit, peruenire non potuit. ad quem etiam ille prodigus, qui cum substantia patris etiam filii nomen amiserat, adspirare non audet dicens: iam non sum dignus uocari filius tuus: post illas enim porcorum siliquas quarum ei satietas negabatur, id est uitiorum sordidos cibos, quia in semet ipsum reuersus et salutari timore conpunctus inmunditiam porcorum horrere iam coeperat ac dirae famis supplicia formidabat, uelut iam seruus effectus etiam mercennarii statura de mercede iam cogitans concupiscit ac dicit: quanti mercennarii patris mei abundant panibus, et ego hic fame pereo. reuertar ergo ad patrem meum et dicam illi: pater, peccaui in caelum et coram te, iam non sum dignus uocari filius tuus: fac me sicut unum de mercennariis tuis. sed istam humilis paenitentiae uocem in occursum eius pater prosiliens maiore quam emissa fuerat pietate suscepit eumque non contentus minora concedere utroque gradu sine dilatione transcurso pristinae filiorum restituit dignitati. festinandum proinde etiam nobis est, ut ad tertium filiorum gradum, qui omnia quae patris sunt sua esse credunt, per indissolubilem caritatis gratiam conscendentes caelestis illius patris imaginem ac similitudinem recipere mereamur et ad imitationem ueri illius filii proclamare possimus: omnia quae habet pater, mea sunt. quod etiam de nobis beatus apostolus profitetur dicens: omnia uestra sunt, siue Paulus siue Apollo siue Cephas, siue mundus siue uita siue mors, siue praesentia siue futura: omnia uestra sunt. ad quam similitudinem etiam saluatoris praecepta nos prouocant: estote, inquit, uos perfecti, sicut et pater uester caelestis perfectus est in illis enim nonnumquam solet interrumpi bonitatis affectus, cum aliquo uel tepore uel laetitia uel oblectatione uigor animi relaxatus aut metum ad praesens gehennae aut desiderium subtrahit futurorum. et est quidem in illis gradus cuiusdam profectus inbuens nos, ut dum uel poenarum metu uel praemiorum spe incipimus uitia declinare, ad caritatis gradum transire possimus, quia timor, inquit, non est in caritate, sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem: quoniam timor poenam habet, qui autem timet non est perfectus in caritate. nos ergo diligamus, quia deus prior dilexit nos. non ergo aliter ad illam ueram perfectionem conscendere poterimus, nisi, quemadmodum nullius alterius nisi nostrae salutis gratia prior nos ille dilexit, ita eum nos quoque nullius alterius rei nisi sui tantum amoris dilexerimus obtentu. quamobrem studendum nobis est, ut de hoc timore ad spem, de spe ad caritatem dei uel ipsarum uirtutum amorem perfecto mentis conscendamus ardore, ut transmigrantes in affectum boni ipsius inmobiliter, quantum humanae possibile est naturae, quod bonum est retentemus.
“If anyone, then, is striving for perfection, from that first stage of fear, which we have called properly servile, of which it is said: “When you have done all things, say: We are unprofitable servants,” he will climb by a step of progress to the higher path of hope. This is compared no longer to a slave but to a hired servant, because it awaits the wages of recompense, and, as though secure about the pardon of sins and the fear of punishment, and conscious of its good works, although it seems to seek the reward promised, it has not yet been able to reach that disposition of the son who, trusting in his father’s generous indulgence, does not doubt that all that is his father’s is his own. To this even the prodigal, who had lost the name of son together with his father’s property, does not dare to aspire, saying: “I am no longer worthy to be called your son.” For after those husks of the swine, of which he was denied his fill, that is, the filthy food of the vices, when he came to himself and, pierced by saving fear, had now begun to shudder at the uncleanness of the swine and to dread the torments of dire hunger, he, having become as it were a slave, now thinking of wages, desires even the rank of a hired servant and says: “How many hired servants of my father have bread in abundance, and I perish here with hunger! I will return to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me as one of your hired servants.” But the father, running out to meet him, received this word of humble repentance with greater kindness than it had been uttered, and, not content to grant him the lesser things, passed over both stages without delay and restored him to the former dignity of sons. We too, then, must hasten, so that, climbing by the indissoluble grace of love to the third stage, that of the sons, who believe that all that is the father’s is theirs, we may deserve to receive the image and likeness of that heavenly Father and be able to cry out, in imitation of that true Son: “All that the Father has is mine.” This the blessed apostle also declares of us, saying: “All things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas, or the world or life or death, or things present or things to come: all are yours.” To this likeness the Savior’s commands also call us: “Be perfect,” he says, “as your heavenly Father is perfect.” For in those others the disposition toward goodness is sometimes interrupted, when the vigor of the soul, slackened by some lukewarmness or joy or delight, takes away for the moment either the fear of hell or the desire of future things. And there is indeed in them a certain stage of progress that teaches us, so that when we begin to avoid vices through fear of punishment or hope of rewards, we may be able to pass on to the stage of love; for, he says, “there is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear has punishment, and he who fears is not perfect in love. Let us therefore love, because God first loved us.” So we shall not be able to climb to that true perfection in any other way than this: that as he first loved us for no other reason than our salvation, so we too love him for no other reason than for love of him alone. Therefore we must strive to climb with perfect ardor of mind from this fear to hope, and from hope to the love of God or the love of the virtues themselves, so that, passing over into the disposition toward goodness itself, we may hold unwaveringly, as far as is possible for human nature, to what is good.
Luke 17:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 15:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:20 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:15 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:48 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 4:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Using the parable of the prodigal son, Chaeremon describes three stages, slave, hired servant, and son, and urges progress from fear through hope to the love that loves God for himself.
- Luke 17:10; Luke 15:19, 15:16–21; Luke 15:31 and John 16:15; 1 Cor 3:22; Matt 5:48; 1 John 4:18–19.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (s for n)): omsia uestra → omnia uestra; Paulus sine Apollo → Paulus siue Apollo; Cephas, sine mundus → Cephas, siue mundus; inquit, nos perfecti → inquit, uos perfecti; ant metum → aut metum; inbaens → inbuens; ut dam uel → ut dum uel.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.7 (CSEL 13:318–320; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.8CSEL 13:320–322
Multum namque differt inter eum qui metu gehennae uel spe retributionis futurae uitiorum in se extinguit incendia, et eum qui diuinae caritatis affectu ipsam malitiam et inmunditiam perhorrescit ac puritatis possidet bonum amore tantum ac desiderio castitatis, nec iam remunerationem futurae promissionis aspiciens, sed praesentis boni delectatus conscientia agit omnia non contemplatione poenarum, sed delectatione uirtutum. hic namque status nec submotis cunctorum hominum testimoniis abuti occasione peccati nec occultis cogitationum uiolari oblectationibus potest, dum affectum uirtutis ipsius medullitus retinens, quidquid illi contrarium est, non solum corde non recipit, uerum etiam summo detestatur horrore. aliud namque est praesenti bono quempiam delectatum odio habere uitiorum carnisue contagia, aliud futurae remunerationis intuitu inlicitas concupiscentias refrenare, aliudque est praesens metuere detrimentum et aliud futurum formidare supplicium. postremo multo maius est propter bonum ipsum a bono nolle discedere, quam propter metum mali malis non praebere consensum. in illo enim uoluntarium bonum est, in isto uero uelut coactum et tamquam nolenti uiolenter extortum uel metu supplicii uel cupiditate praemiorum. nam qui timoris obtentu a uitiorum abstinet blandimentis, adempto timoris obstaculo rursum ad illud quod diligit reuertetur et ob id nec stabilitatem boni iugiter obtinebit, sed ne ab inpugnatione quidem aliquando requiescet, quia nec firmam ac perpetuam pacem castimoniae possidebit. ubi enim est inquietudo bellorum, non possunt non etiam uulnerum interuenire discrimina. necesse est enim quempiam in conflictu situm, quamuis bellator sit ac fortiter dimicans letalia aduersariis uulnera frequenter infligat, nonnumquam tamen hostili mucrone perstringi. qui uero superata inpugnatione uitiorum pacis iam securitate perfruitur et transiit in ipsius uirtutis affectum, ingea statum illius boni cuius iam totus est retentabit, quia damno intimae castitatis nihil credit esse damnosius. nec enim carius ac pretiosius quicquam praesenti iudicat puritate, cui poena grauis est uel uirtutum perniciosa transgressio uel ipsius uitii uirulenta contagio. huic, inquam, nec reuerentia humanae praesentiae quicquam adiciet honestatis nec minuet solitudo, sed ubique secum semperque circumferens arbitram non solum actuum, sed etiam cogitationum suarum conscientiam illi potissimum studere contendet, quam nec circumueniri nec falli nec subterfugere se posse cognoscit.
“For there is a great difference between one who extinguishes the fires of the vices in himself through fear of hell or hope of future reward, and one who, from the disposition of divine love, shudders at wickedness and uncleanness themselves and possesses the good of purity only out of love and desire for chastity, who, no longer looking to the reward of a future promise but delighted with the consciousness of a present good, does everything not in view of punishments but in delight in the virtues. For this state can neither abuse an opportunity to sin when all human witnesses are removed, nor be violated by the hidden delights of thoughts, since, holding the disposition of virtue itself in its very marrow, it not only does not admit into the heart whatever is contrary to it, but even detests it with the greatest horror. For it is one thing for someone, delighted by a present good, to hate the vices and the contagions of the flesh, and another to restrain unlawful desires in view of future reward; and it is one thing to fear present loss and another to dread future punishment. Finally, it is far greater to be unwilling to leave the good for the sake of the good itself than not to consent to evil for fear of evil. For in the former the good is voluntary, but in the latter it is as though forced and violently wrung from one who is unwilling, either by fear of punishment or by desire of rewards. For he who abstains from the allurements of the vices by reason of fear will return again to what he loves once the barrier of fear is removed, and so he will not keep the stability of good continually, nor will he ever rest even from attack, since he will not possess a firm and lasting peace of chastity. For where there is the unrest of wars, the dangers of wounds cannot but occur. For anyone placed in battle, however much a warrior he is and however bravely he fights, often inflicting deadly wounds on his opponents, must sometimes be grazed by the enemy’s sword. But he who has overcome the assault of the vices and now enjoys the security of peace, and has passed over into the disposition of virtue itself, will keep the state of that good to which he now wholly belongs, since he believes nothing more damaging than the loss of inner chastity. For he judges nothing dearer or more precious than present purity, and for him either a harmful transgression of the virtues or the poisonous contagion of vice itself is a grievous punishment. To such a man, I say, neither will reverence for human presence add anything of uprightness, nor will solitude lessen it; but carrying everywhere and always with him his conscience as judge not only of his actions but also of his thoughts, he will strive to please it above all, knowing that he can neither get round it, nor deceive it, nor escape it.”
Notes and citation
Summary: One who avoids sin for love of goodness itself is steadier than one who does so from fear or hope of reward, whose restraint lapses when fear is gone; the lover of purity keeps it the same in solitude as in company.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slip (t for l); OCR slips; OCR slips (e for o)): aiind → aliud; madus eet → maius est; noUe → nolle; IIIud → illud; poesiMit → possidebit; nen possunt nem etiam → non possunt non etiam; inftigat → infligat; pretiosins → pretiosius; eai poena → cui poena; quioquam → quicquam; snbterfugere → subterfugere.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.8 (CSEL 13:320–322; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.9CSEL 13:322–324
Quem statum si quis de adiutorio dei, non de studii sui labore praesumens meruerit possidere, de condicione seruili, in qua timor est, et mercennaria spei cupiditate, in qua non tam bonitas largientis quam praemium retributionis expetitur, in adoptionem incipiet transire filiorum, ubi iam non timor, non cupiditas, sed illa caritas quae numquam cadit iugiter perseuerat. de quo timore et caritate quosdam increpans dominus quid cui personae conueniret ostendit: filius honorat patrem, et seruus dominum suum timet: et si pater ego sum, ubi est honor meus: et si dominus ego sum, ubi est timor meus? necesse est enim timere eum qui seruus est, quia si sciens uoluntatem domini sui fecerit digna plagis, uapulabit multis. per hanc itaque caritatem quisque ad imaginem dei similitudinemque peruenerit, bono iam propter boni ipsius delectabitur uoluptatem, ac similem quodammodo possidens patientiae ac lenitatis affectum nullis deinceps peccantium uitiis irascetur, sed ueniam potius infirmitatibus eorum condolens atque conpatiens inplorabit, seque reminiscens tamdiu similium passionum stimulis inpugnatum, donec miseratione domini saluaretur, nec suo eruditum studio ab inpugnatione carnali, sed dei protectione saluatum, non iracundiam, sed misericordiam errantibus intelleget inpendendam, illum uersiculum ad deum cum omni cordis tranquillitate decantans: tu disrupisti uincula mea: tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis, et: nisi quia dominus adiuuit me: paulo minus habitauerat in inferno anima mea. et in hac mentis humilitate consistens poterit etiam euangelicum illud perfectionis explere mandatum: diligite inimicos uestros, bene facite his qui oderunt uos, et orate pro persequentibus et calumniantibus uos. et ita ad illud praemium quod subiungitur merebimur peruenire, per quod non solum imaginem dei et similitudinem praeferamus, uerum etiam filii nuncupemur: ut sitis, inquit, filii patris uestri qui in caelis est, qui solem suum oriri facit super bonos et malos, et pluit super iustos et iniustos. quem affectum beatus Iohannes adsecutum se esse cognoscens ait: ut fiduciam habeamus in die iudicii, quia sicut ille est et nos sumus in hoc mundo. in quo enim infirma et fragilis humana natura esse, sicut ille est, potest, nisi si in bonos et malos, iustos et iniustos ad imitationem dei placidam semper sui cordis extenderit caritatem, et ut bonum propter boni ipsius operetur affectum, perueniens ad illam ueram adoptionem filiorum dei, de qua idem beatus apostolus ita pronuntiat: omnis qui natus est ex deo peccatum non facit, quia semen ipsius in eo est, et non potest peccare, quoniam ex deo natus est, et iterum: scimus quoniam omnis qui natus est ex deo non peccat, sed generatio dei conseruat eum, et malignus non tangit eum? quod intellegendum est non de omni genere peccatorum, sed de capitalibus tantum criminibus dici. a quibus se quisquis extrahere atque emundare noluerit, pro illo in alio loco praedictus apostolus ne orari quidem debere pronuntiat qui scit, inquiens, fratrem suum peccare peccatum non ad mortem, petet, et dabit ei uitam, peccantibus non ad mortem. est peccatum ad mortem: non pro illo dico ut roget. ceterum de illis quae pronuntiantur non esse ad mortem, a quibus etiam hi qui fideliter Christo deseruiunt, quantalibet semet ipsos circumspectione custodiant, inmunes esse non possunt, ita dicitur: si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, ipsi nos decipimus et ueritas in nobis non est, et iterum: si dixerimus quia non peccauimus, mendacem facimus eum et uerbum eius non est in nobis. inpossibile namque est quemlibet sanctorum non in istis minutiis, quae per sermonem, per cogitationem, per ignorantiam, per obliuionem, per necessitatem, per uoluntatem, per obreptionem admittuntur, incurrere. quae licet ab illo peccato quod ad mortem dicitur aliena sint, culpa tamen ac reprehensione carere non possunt.
“If anyone, relying on God’s help and not on the labor of his own effort, deserves to possess this state, he will begin to pass from the servile condition, in which there is fear, and from the hireling’s desire of hope, in which what is sought is not so much the goodness of the giver as the reward of recompense, into the adoption of sons, where there is no longer fear, no longer desire, but that love which never fails continues for ever. Rebuking certain people about this fear and love, the Lord showed what suits which person: “A son honors his father, and a servant fears his master. If then I am a father, where is my honor? And if I am a master, where is my fear?” For one who is a slave must fear, since “if, knowing his master’s will, he has done things worthy of stripes, he will be beaten with many.” Whoever, then, through this love has reached the image and likeness of God will now delight in the good for the pleasure of the good itself, and, possessing in a way a like disposition of patience and gentleness, will no longer be angry at any vices of sinners, but rather, grieving and suffering with their weaknesses, will beg pardon for them. Remembering that he himself was attacked by the goads of similar passions until he was saved by the Lord’s mercy, and that he was delivered from the assault of the flesh not by his own effort but by God’s protection, he will understand that not anger but mercy should be shown to those who go astray, singing to God that verse with all tranquillity of heart: “You have broken my bonds; to you I will offer the sacrifice of praise,” and: “Unless the Lord had helped me, my soul would soon have dwelt in hell.” And abiding in this humility of mind he will be able to fulfil that gospel command of perfection too: “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who persecute and slander you.” And so we shall deserve to reach that reward which is added, by which we not only bear the image and likeness of God but are even called sons: “that you may be,” he says, “sons of your Father who is in heaven, who makes his sun rise on the good and the evil, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.” Blessed John, knowing that he had attained this disposition, says: “that we may have confidence on the day of judgment, because as he is, so are we in this world.” For in what can weak and frail human nature be as he is, unless it always extends the calm love of its heart to good and evil, just and unjust, in imitation of God, and does good from the disposition of goodness itself, reaching that true adoption of the sons of God of which the same blessed apostle declares: “Everyone who is born of God does not commit sin, because his seed abides in him, and he cannot sin, because he is born of God,” and again: “We know that everyone who is born of God does not sin, but his being born of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him”? This must be understood as said not of every kind of sin but only of capital crimes. Whoever will not withdraw and cleanse himself from these, the same apostle in another place declares should not even be prayed for, saying: “If anyone knows that his brother is sinning a sin not unto death, he shall ask, and He will give him life, for those who sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death; I do not say that one should ask for that.” But of those which are declared not to be unto death, from which even those who serve Christ faithfully cannot be free, however carefully they guard themselves, it is said: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us,” and again: “If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.” For it is impossible for any of the saints not to fall into those small faults which are committed by word, by thought, by ignorance, by forgetfulness, by necessity, by the will, by surprise. Although these are different from the sin that is called unto death, they cannot be free from fault and blame.
1 Cor 13:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mal 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:47 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:16 (115:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:17 (115:8 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 94:17 (93:17 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:44 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:45 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Those who reach the love of sons imitate God’s goodness, showing mercy rather than anger to sinners and loving enemies; the saying that those born of God do not sin refers to capital sins, since even the saints commit small faults.
- 1 Cor 13:8; Rom 8:15; Mal 1:6; Luke 12:47–48; Ps 116:16–17 (LXX 115:7–8); Ps 94:17 (LXX 93:17); Matt 5:44 (with Luke 6:27–28); Matt 5:45; 1 John 4:17; 1 John 3:9; 5:18; 5:16; 1:8; 1:10.
- The distinction between capital sins and small daily faults is Chaeremon’s; it is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for s); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (i for x); OCR slip (t for c); OCR slip (t for r); OCR slips; OCR slips and stray periods): ae lenitatis → ac lenitatis; deum eam omni → deum cum omni; caelis eat → caelis est; siont → sicut; ei deo non peccat → ex deo non peccat; aea do omni → non de omni; a quibus M quisquis → a quibus se quisquis; peeeatam → peccatum; at roget → ut roget; faeimos eam → facimus eum; pet obreptionem → per obreptionem; litet → licet; Mortem.. dieitur → mortem dicitur; petaolntatem → per uoluntatem.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.9 (CSEL 13:322–324; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.10CSEL 13:324–325
Cum ergo quis hunc quem praediximus bonitatis affectum et imitationem dei fuerit adsecutus, tunc uisceribus dominicae longanimitatis indutus pro persecutoribus quoque suis orabit similiter dicens: pater, ignosce eis: non enim sciunt quid faciunt. ceterum euidens indicium est animae necdum uitiorum faecibus eliquatae in criminibus alienis non affectu misericordiae condolere, sed rigidam iudicantis tenere censuram. nam quemadmodum perfectionem cordis poterit obtinere is; qui non habet illud quo apostolus plenitudinem legis consummari posse signauit alterutrum, inquiens, onera uestra portate, et sic adimplebitis legem Christi, sed nec illam uirtutem possidet caritatis, quae non inritatur, non inflatur, non cogitat malum, quae omnia suffert, omnia sustinet? iustus enim miseretur animas pecorum suorum: uiscera autem inpiorum sine misericordia. ideoque isdem uitiis monachum subiacere certissimum est, quae in alio inclementi atque inhumana seueritate condemnat. rex enim rigidus incurret in mala, et qui obturat aures suas ne audiat infirmum, et ipse inuocabit, et non erit qui exaudiat eum.
“When, then, someone has attained this disposition of goodness and imitation of God that we have described, then, clothed with the heart of the Lord’s long-suffering, he will pray even for his persecutors, saying likewise: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” On the other hand, it is a clear sign of a soul not yet strained clean of the dregs of the vices not to grieve with a feeling of mercy at the crimes of others, but to keep the rigid censure of a judge. For how will he be able to obtain perfection of heart who does not have that by which the apostle indicated that the fullness of the law can be completed, saying: “Bear one another’s burdens, and so you will fulfil the law of Christ,” and who does not possess that virtue of love which “is not provoked, is not puffed up, thinks no evil, bears all things, endures all things”? For “the righteous man has pity on the lives of his beasts, but the heart of the wicked is without mercy.” And therefore it is quite certain that a monk is subject to the same vices that he condemns in another with unmerciful and inhuman severity. For “a harsh king will fall into evils,” and “he who stops his ears so as not to hear the weak, he too will call, and there will be no one to hear him.”
Col 3:12 (echo, low confidence) · Luke 23:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 6:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 12:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 13:17 (quotation, medium confidence) · Prov 21:13 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The perfect pray for their persecutors as Christ did, while harsh judgment of others is a sign of unpurified vices and brings one into the same sins.
- Col 3:12 (“heart of mercy”); Luke 23:34; Gal 6:2; 1 Cor 13:4–7; Prov 12:10; Prov 13:17 (LXX; the Hebrew differs); Prov 21:13.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): tnne → tunc; teaare → tenere.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.10 (CSEL 13:324–325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.11CSEL 13:325–326
GERMANVS: Potenter quidem atque magnifice de perfecta dei caritate dissertum est. uerumtamen illud nos permouet, quod, cum eam tanta laude praetuleris, timorem dei et spem retributionis aeternae inperfecta esse dixisti, cum utique multo aliud uideatur de eis propheta sensisse dicens: timete dominum omnes sancti eius: quia nihil deest timentibus eum, et iterum in obseruandis iustificationibus dei retributionis ac contemplatione fateatur exercitum inclinaui, inquiens, cor meum ad faciendas iustificationes tuas in aeternum, propter retributionem. et apostolus fide, inquit, Moyses grandis factus negauit se esse filium filiae Pharaonis, magis eligens adfligi cum populo dei quam temporalis peccati habere iucunditatem, maiores diuitias aestimans thesauris Aegyptiorum inproperium Christi: aspiciebat enim in remunerationem. quomodo ergo inperfecta esse credenda sunt, cum et beatus Dauid retributionis obtentu iustificationes domini se fecisse glorietur, et legislator praemia futura prospiciens spreuisse adoptionem regiae dignitatis et adflictionem dirissimam thesauris Aegyptiorum praetulisse dicatur?
Germanus: “You have discoursed powerfully and magnificently on the perfect love of God. Yet this troubles us: that while you exalted it with such praise, you said that the fear of God and the hope of eternal reward are imperfect, although the prophet seems to have thought quite otherwise of them, saying: “Fear the Lord, all you his saints, for there is no want to those who fear him,” and again confessing that he practised the keeping of God’s righteous ordinances in view of the reward, saying: “I have inclined my heart to do your righteous ordinances for ever, because of the reward.” And the apostle says: “By faith Moses, when he was grown, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to be afflicted with the people of God than to have the pleasure of sin for a time, esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of the Egyptians; for he looked to the reward.” How, then, are they to be thought imperfect, when blessed David boasts that he did the Lord’s righteous ordinances for the sake of the reward, and the lawgiver is said to have scorned adoption into royal dignity and to have preferred the harshest affliction to the treasures of the Egyptians, looking forward to future rewards?”
Ps 34:9 (33:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:112 (118:112 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 11:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 11:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 11:26 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Germanus objects that Scripture praises the fear of God and shows David and Moses acting in view of reward, so how can fear and hope be imperfect?
- Ps 34:9 (LXX 33:10); Ps 119:112 (LXX 118:112, following the Greek and Latin reading “because of the reward”); Heb 11:24–26.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (o for c)): praetularia → praetuleris; ae contemplatione → ac contemplatione; oam populo → cum populo; adfliotionem → adflictionem.
Topics: Ethics, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.11 (CSEL 13:325–326; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.12CSEL 13:326–329
CHAEREMON: Pro statu atque mensura uniuscuiusque mentis scriptura diuina ad diuersos perfectionum gradus arbitrii nostri prouocat libertatem. nec enim poterat uniformis omnibus perfectionis corona proponi, quia nec omnium una uirtus aut uoluntas aut feruor est, et idcirco ipsarum quodammodo perfectionum diuersos ordines diuersasque mensuras sermo diuinus instituit. quod ita esse euangelicarum quoque beatitudinum uarietas euidenter ostendit. licet enim beati dicantur quorum sunt regna caelorum, et beati qui possidebunt terram, et beati qui consolationem recipient, et beati qui saturitate potientur, tamen multum credimus interesse inter habitationem regni caelorum et possessionem illius quaecumque est terrae, et inter perceptionem consolationis et plenitudinem saturitatemque iustitiae, multumque distare inter illos qui misericordiam consequentur et illos qui gloriosissima uisione dei perfrui merebuntur. alia enim gloria solis, et alia gloria lunae, et alia gloria stellarum: stella enim a stella differt in gloria. ita et resurrectio mortuorum. cum igitur iuxta hunc modum scriptura diuina timentes deum laudet et dicat: beati omnes, qui timent dominum, et plenam per hoc illis beatitudinem repromittat, iterum tamen dicit: timor non est in caritate, sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem: quoniam timor poenam habet, qui autem timet non est perfectus in caritate. et rursus, cum seruire deo gloriosum sit et dicatur: seruite domino in timore, et: magnum tibi est uocari seruum meum, et: beatus seruus ille, quem cum uenerit dominus suus inueniet sic facientem, tamen ad apostolos dicitur: iam non dico uos seruos, quia seruus nescit quid faciat dominus suus: uos autem dico amicos, quia omnia quaecumque audiui a patre nota feci uobis, et iterum: uos amici mei estis, si feceritis ea quae praecipio uobis. uidetis ergo perfectionum gradus esse diuersos et de excelsis ad excelsiora nos a domino prouocari ita, ut is qui in timore dei beatus et perfectus extiterit, ambulans sicut scriptum est de uirtute in uirtutem et de perfectione ad aliam perfectionem, id est de timore ad spem mentis alacritate conscendens, ad beatiorem denuo statum, quod est caritas, inuitetur, et qui fuerit fidelis seruus ac prudens, ad amicitiae sodalitatem et adoptionem transeat filiorum. secundum hunc ergo sensum nostra quoque est intellegenda sententia: non quo contemplationem perpetuae illius poenae uel beatissimae retributionis quae repromittitur sanctis nullius pronuntiemus esse momenti, sed quia, cum sint utiles et sectatores suos ad initia beatitudinis introducant, caritas rursum, in qua plenior fiducia perpetuumque iam gaudium est, adsumens eos de timore seruili et mercennaria spe ad dilectionem dei et adoptionem transferet filiorum et quodammodo perfectiores faciet de perfectis. multae enim ait saluator mansiones sunt apud patrem meum, et licet omnia astra esse uideantur in caelo, inter claritatem tamen solis et lunae atque luciferi ceterarumque stellarum multa distantia est. et idcirco beatus apostolus non solum timori ac spei, sed etiam cunctis charismatibus, quae magna ac mirifica habentur, eam praeferens supra modum excellentiorem omnibus uiam caritatis ostendit. nam cum uellet expleto omni catalogo spiritalium charismatum uirtutum eius membra describere, ita praefatus est: et adhuc supra modum excellentiorem uobis uiam demonstro. si linguis hominum loquar et angelorum, et si habuero prophetiam et nouerim mysteria omnia et omnem scientiam, et si habuero omnem fidem ita ut montes transferam, et si distribuero in cibos pauperum omnes facultates meas, et tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, caritatem autem non habuero, nihil mihi prodest. uidetis ergo nihil pretiosius, nihil perfectius nihilque sublimius et ut ita dixerim nihil caritate perennius inueniri. siue enim prophetiae, euacuabuntur: siue linguae, cessabunt: siue scientia, destruetur. caritas autem numquam excidet, sine qua non solum illa praecellentissima charismatum genera, sed etiam martyrii ipsius gloria euacuatur.
Chaeremon: “Divine Scripture calls the freedom of our will to different degrees of perfection according to the state and measure of each mind. For one uniform crown of perfection could not be set before all, since there is not one virtue, will, or fervor in all; and therefore the divine word has established, as it were, different ranks and different measures of perfection itself. The variety of the gospel beatitudes also shows plainly that this is so. For although those are called blessed whose is the kingdom of heaven, and blessed those who will possess the earth, and blessed those who will receive consolation, and blessed those who will obtain their fill, yet we believe there is a great difference between dwelling in the kingdom of heaven and possessing that earth, whatever it is, and between receiving consolation and the fullness and satisfaction of righteousness, and a great distance between those who will obtain mercy and those who will deserve to enjoy the most glorious vision of God. “For there is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead.” Although, then, in this way divine Scripture praises those who fear God and says: “Blessed are all who fear the Lord,” and thereby promises them full blessedness, yet again it says: “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear has punishment, and he who fears is not perfect in love.” And again, though it is glorious to serve God, and it is said: “Serve the Lord in fear,” and: “It is a great thing for you to be called my servant,” and: “Blessed is that servant whom his master, when he comes, will find so doing,” yet it is said to the apostles: “I no longer call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master does; but I call you friends, because all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you,” and again: “You are my friends if you do what I command you.” You see, then, that the degrees of perfection are different, and that we are called by the Lord from high things to higher, so that one who has become blessed and perfect in the fear of God, walking, as it is written, “from strength to strength,” and from one perfection to another, that is, rising with eagerness of mind from fear to hope, may be invited again to a more blessed state, which is love; and that one who has been “a faithful and wise servant” may pass to the companionship of friendship and the adoption of sons. In this sense, then, our statement too is to be understood: not that we declare the thought of that eternal punishment, or of the most blessed reward promised to the saints, to be of no moment, but that, although these are useful and bring those who follow them to the beginnings of blessedness, love, in which there is fuller confidence and joy now lasting, takes them up from servile fear and hireling hope, transfers them to the love of God and the adoption of sons, and in a way makes the perfect more perfect. For “in my Father’s house,” says the Savior, “there are many mansions,” and although all the stars appear to be in the sky, yet there is a great difference between the brightness of the sun and of the moon and of the morning star and of the other stars. And therefore the blessed apostle, preferring love not only to fear and hope but also to all the gifts that are held great and wonderful, shows the way of love as more excellent beyond measure than all. For when, having completed the whole list of spiritual gifts, he wanted to describe the members of its virtue, he began thus: “And yet I show you a more excellent way beyond measure. If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith so that I could move mountains, and if I distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and hand over my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.” You see, then, that nothing is found more precious, nothing more perfect, nothing more sublime, and, if I may so put it, nothing more lasting than love. “For whether there are prophecies, they will pass away; whether tongues, they will cease; whether knowledge, it will be destroyed. But love never fails,” and without it not only those most excellent kinds of gifts but even the glory of martyrdom itself is made void.
Matt 5:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:41 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 128:1 (127:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 49:6 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 24:46 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 84:7 (83:8 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:45 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:31 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chaeremon answers that Scripture calls people to different degrees of perfection; fear and hope are good and lead to blessedness, but love, which surpasses even the spiritual gifts and martyrdom, makes the perfect more perfect.
- Matt 5:3–8; 1 Cor 15:41–42; Ps 128:1 (LXX 127:1); 1 John 4:18; Ps 2:11; Isa 49:6 (Latin text); Matt 24:46; John 15:15; 15:14; Ps 84:7 (LXX 83:8); Matt 24:45; John 14:2; 1 Cor 12:31; 13:1–3; 13:8.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for i); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for u); stray period in the digital text): menauras → mensuras; dico nos seruos → dico uos seruos; nos amici mei → uos amici mei; nidetis → uidetis; dinersos → diuersos; seeundum → secundum; laciferi → luciferi; non solom → non solum; charismatabus → charismatibus; caritatem autem. non → caritatem autem non; uidetis eige → uidetis ergo; perfectias → perfectius; et at ita dixerim → et ut ita dixerim; sine linguae → siue linguae.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.12 (CSEL 13:326–329; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.13CSEL 13:329–331
Quisquis igitur huius fuerit caritatis perfectione fundatus, necesse est ut ad illum sublimiorem caritatis timorem gradu excellentiore conscendat, quem non poenarum terror nec cupido praemiorum, sed amoris generat magnitudo, quo uel filius indulgentissimum patrem uel frater fratrem uel amicum amicus uel coniugem coniunx sollicito reueretur affectu, clam eius non uerbera neque conuicia, sed uel tenuem amoris formidat offensam atque in omnibus non solum actibus, uerum etiam uerbis adtonita semper pietate distenditur, ne erga se quantulumcumque feruor dilectionis illius intepescat. cuius timoris magnificentiam unus prophetarum eleganter expressit diuitiae, inquiens, salutis sapientia et scientia: timor domini ipse thesaurus eius. non potuit timoris istius dignitatem ac meritum magis euidenter exprimere, quam ut diuitias salutis nostrae, quae in uera sapientia dei scientiaque consistunt, diceret nisi a timore domini non posse seruari. ad hunc igitur metum non peccatores, sed sancti propheticis inuitantur eloquiis dicente psalmographo: timete dominum omnes sancti eius: quia nihil deest timentibus eum. qui enim hoc timore dominum metuit, perfectioni eius certum est nihil deesse. nam de illo timore poenali euidenter Iohannes apostolus dicit: qui timet non est perfectus in caritate, quia timor poenam habet. multa ergo distantia est inter istum timorem cui nihil deest, qui sapientiae scientiaeque thesaurus est, et illum inperfectum, qui principium sapientiae nuncupatur quique poenam in sese continens de perfectorum cordibus superueniente plenitudine caritatis extruditur. timor enim non est in caritate, sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem. et re uera si principium sapientiae in timore consistit, quae erit eius nisi in Christi caritate perfectio, quae illum in sese perfectae dilectionis continens metum non iam principium, sed thesaurus sapientiae et scientiae nuncupatur? et idcirco duplex timoris est gradus. unus incipientium, id est eorum qui adhuc sub iugo et terrore seruili sunt, de quo dicitur: et seruus dominum suum timebit, et in euangelio: iam non dico uos seruos, quia seruus nescit quid faciat dominus suus. et ideo seruus, inquit, non manet in domo in aeternum, filius manet in aeternum. inbuit enim nos ut ab illo poenali metu ad caritatis plenissimam libertatem et amicorum filiorumque dei fiduciam transeamus. denique beatus apostolus, qui seruilem illam timoris gradum olim caritatis dominicae uirtute transcenderat, inferiora despiciens maioribus se ditatum bonis a domino profitetur. non enim, inquit, dedit nobis deus spiritum timoris, sed uirtutis et dilectionis et sobrietatis. eos etiam, qui perfecta caelestis illius patris dilectione flagrabant quosque ex seruis filios adoptio diuina iam fecerat, hoc adhortatur eloquio: non enim accepistis spiritum seruitutis iterum in timore, sed accepistis spiritum adoptionis, in quo clamamus Abba pater. de hoc etiam metu, cum illam septiformem spiritum propheta describeret, quem in homine illo dominico secundum incarnationis dispensationem descendisse non dubium est, dixissetque: et requiescet super eum spiritus domini: spiritus sapientiae, et intellectus, spiritus consilii, et fortitudinis, spiritus scientiae, et pietatis, nouissime uelut quiddam praecipuum intulit dicens: et replebit eum spiritus timoris domini. in quo primitus illud est diligentius intuendum, quod non dixerit et requiescet super eum spiritus timoris domini, sicut de illis prioribus dixerat, sed replebit, inquit, eum spiritus timoris domini. tanta enim ubertatis eius est magnitudo, ut, quem semel sua uirtute possederit, non partem, sed totam eius occupet mentem. nec inmerito. illi etenim quae numquam excidet cohaerens caritati non solum replet, sed etiam perpetua et inseparabili eum quem ceperit possidet iugitate, nullis laetitiae temporalis uel uoluptatum oblectationibus inminutus: quod nonnumquam illi qui foras mittitur timori euenire consueuit. hic est igitur perfectionis timor, quo homo ille dominicus, qui non solum redimere humanum genus, sed etiam praebere uenerat perfectionis formam atque exempla uirtutum, repletus fuisse narratur. illum enim seruilem suppliciorum timorem uerus dei filius, qui peccatum non fecit, nec dolus inuentus est in ore eius, habere non potuit.-
“Whoever, then, has been grounded in the perfection of this love must climb by a more excellent step to that more sublime fear of love, which is produced not by terror of punishment or desire of rewards but by the greatness of love. It is the fear with which a son reveres a most indulgent father, or a brother his brother, or a friend his friend, or a spouse a spouse, with anxious affection, dreading not his blows or reproaches but even the slightest offense against love, and in all things, not only deeds but also words, is always intent with anxious devotion lest the fervor of that love toward himself should cool in the least degree. One of the prophets expressed the magnificence of this fear elegantly, saying: “Wisdom and knowledge are the riches of salvation; the fear of the Lord is his treasure.” He could not express the dignity and merit of this fear more plainly than by saying that the riches of our salvation, which consist in the true wisdom and knowledge of God, cannot be kept except by the fear of the Lord. To this fear, then, not sinners but saints are invited by the words of the prophet, as the psalmist says: “Fear the Lord, all you his saints, for there is no want to those who fear him.” For it is certain that nothing is wanting to the perfection of one who fears the Lord with this fear. For of that penal fear the apostle John plainly says: “He who fears is not perfect in love, because fear has punishment.” There is therefore a great distance between this fear to which nothing is wanting, which is the treasure of wisdom and knowledge, and that imperfect fear which is called “the beginning of wisdom,” and which, containing punishment in itself, is driven out of the hearts of the perfect when the fullness of love comes upon them. “For there is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear.” And indeed, if the beginning of wisdom lies in fear, what will be its perfection but in the love of Christ, which, containing in itself that fear of perfect love, is called no longer the beginning but the treasure of wisdom and knowledge? And therefore fear has a twofold degree. One is that of beginners, that is, of those who are still under the yoke and terror of slaves, of which it is said: “And a servant will fear his master,” and in the gospel: “I no longer call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master does.” And therefore, he says, “the servant does not remain in the house for ever; the son remains for ever.” For he teaches us to pass from that penal fear to the fullest freedom of love and to the confidence of the friends and sons of God. Finally, the blessed apostle, who had long since passed beyond that servile degree of fear by the power of the Lord’s love, despises the lower things and declares that he has been enriched by the Lord with greater goods: “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and love and self-control.” Those, too, who were burning with perfect love for that heavenly Father, and whom divine adoption had already made sons out of slaves, he exhorts with these words: “For you have not received the spirit of slavery again in fear, but you have received the spirit of adoption, in which we cry, Abba, Father.” Of this fear also the prophet speaks when he describes that sevenfold Spirit which, without doubt, descended upon the Lord’s man according to the dispensation of the incarnation. Having said: “And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and godliness,” he added last, as something special: “And the spirit of the fear of the Lord shall fill him.” Here we must first note carefully that he did not say, “And the spirit of the fear of the Lord shall rest upon him,” as he had said of the former, but “the spirit of the fear of the Lord shall fill him.” For so great is the abundance of its richness that, when once it has possessed someone by its power, it occupies not a part but the whole of his mind. And not without reason. For, clinging to that love which never fails, it not only fills but possesses the one it has taken hold of with a perpetual and inseparable continuity, not lessened by any delights of temporal joy or pleasures, as sometimes happens to the fear that is cast out. This, then, is the fear of perfection with which the Lord’s man, who had come not only to redeem the human race but also to give a pattern of perfection and examples of the virtues, is said to have been filled. For the true Son of God, “who committed no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth,” could not have that servile fear of punishments.
Isa 33:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 34:9 (33:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 111:10 (110:10 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Mal 1:6 (quotation, medium confidence) · John 15:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 1:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:3 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Perfect love produces a higher fear, the loving reverence of a son or friend who dreads only to offend, which Scripture calls a treasure and which filled Christ, unlike the servile fear that love casts out.
- Isa 33:6 (LXX); Ps 34:9 (LXX 33:10); 1 John 4:18; Ps 111:10 (LXX 110:10); Mal 1:6; John 15:15; John 8:35; 2 Tim 1:7; Rom 8:15; Isa 11:2–3 (LXX and Latin, with “godliness” as the sixth gift); 1 Pet 2:22; Col 2:3.
- “The Lord’s man” (homo dominicus) is an early Christian expression for the humanity assumed by the Son; it is translated literally.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (e for o); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (letters dropped); OCR slip (m for ru); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); line-end hyphen and OCR slips; split word and OCR slip): hains → huius; neoeese → necesse; excellentiere → excellentiore; coauioia → conuicia; erga ee → erga se; magnifioentiam → magnificentiam; ae meritum → ac meritum; poese seruari → posse seruari; psslmographo → psalmographo; timenti bus eom → timentibus eum; distantia eet → distantia est; foras mittit timor. et → foras mittit timorem. et; dico nos seruos → dico uos seruos; filio-. rnmque → filiorumque; eoe etiam → eos etiam; illins → illius; ex semis → ex seruis; praeoipuum → praecipuum; hie est → hic est.
Topics: Ethics, Christology
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.13 (CSEL 13:329–331; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.14CSEL 13:331–332
GERMANVS: Quia de perfectione caritatis sermo digestus est, uolumus etiam de castitatis fine aliqua liberius sciscitari. non enim ambigimus illud praecelsum fastigium caritatis, per quam, sicut huc usque dissertum est, ad imaginem dei similitudinemque conscenditur, sine castitatis perfectione subsistere omnino non posse: sed utrum ita eius possit perpetuitas obtineri, ut numquam libidinis titillatio integritatem nostri cordis infestet, et ita ualeamus ab hac passione carnali in carne degentes peregrinari, ut numquam incentiuorum aestibus aduramur, uolumus edoceri.
Germanus: “Since the discourse has dealt with the perfection of love, we want also to ask somewhat more freely about the end of chastity. For we do not doubt that that most exalted height of love, by which, as has been discussed so far, one climbs to the image and likeness of God, cannot exist at all without the perfection of chastity. But we want to be taught whether its permanence can be obtained so fully that the titillation of lust never troubles the integrity of our heart, and whether we can be so far removed from this fleshly passion while living in the flesh that we are never burned by the heat of its incitements.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Germanus asks whether perfect and lasting chastity, free from every stirring of lust, is possible in this life.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (n for u); stray period in the digital text): fastigium. caritatis → fastigium caritatis; adnramur → aduramur; nolumus edoceri → uolumus edoceri.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.14 (CSEL 13:331–332; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
11.15CSEL 13:332–333
CHAEREMON: Summae quidem beatitudinis ac singularis est meriti ita istum per quem domino cohaeremus affectum uel discere iugiter uel docere, ut meditatio eius secundum psalmographi sententiam omnes uitae nostrae dies noctesque consumat et mentem nostram insatiabiliter esurientem sitientemque iustitiam caelestis huius cibi perpetua ruminatione sustentet. sed consulendum est etiam iumento corporis nostri secundum benignissimam saluatoris nostri prouidentiam, ne deficiat in uia: spiritus enim promptus, caro autem infirma. quae etiam nunc uel exigui cibi perceptione curanda est, ut post refectionem eius etiam ad ea quae desideratis diligentius indaganda mentis quoque addatur intentio.
Chaeremon: “It belongs to the highest blessedness and singular merit so to learn or teach continually this disposition by which we cleave to the Lord that, according to the psalmist’s saying, meditation on it takes up all the days and nights of our life, and sustains our mind, insatiably hungering and thirsting for righteousness, by continual rumination on this heavenly food. But we must also care for the beast of burden that is our body, according to the most kind providence of our Savior, “lest it faint on the way”; for “the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.” It must now be cared for by taking a little food, so that after its refreshment the attention of the mind may also be applied to investigating more carefully what you desire.”
Ps 1:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 15:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:41 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chaeremon postpones the question on chastity until after a meal, since the body too must be cared for.
- Ps 1:2; Matt 5:6; Matt 15:32; Matt 26:41. The question is answered in Conference 12.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 11.15 (CSEL 13:332–333; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/11-1/#p-11-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-11-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).