The Conferences 18.15–18.16
Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).
Chapter 18
18.15CSEL 13:523–526
Nunc aliud abbatis Pafnuti pandamus exemplum, qui in illius insignis et ubique praedicabilis Scitioticae heremi in qua nunc presbyter est secretis tanto studio semper insedit, ut ei ceteri anachoretae Bubali cognomen indiderint, eo quod ingenito ut ita dixerim desiderio solitudinis semper habitatione gauderet. itaque cum tantae in pueritia esset uirtutis ac gratiae, ut etiam praeclari ac summi id temporis uiri grauitatem eius et inmobilem constantiam mirarentur eumque, licet minor esset aetate, pro uirtutum tamen merito senioribus exaequarent suoque ordini ducerent inserendum, liuor ille qui aduersus Ioseph patriarcham fraternos quondam animos instigauit, quendam de numero fratrum edaci zeli igne succendit: qui naeuo quodam ac macula pulchritudinem eius cupiens deformare hoc genus malignitatis excogitat, ut oportunitatem temporis captaret, quo Pafnutius ad ecclesiam die dominica processurus abesset a cella. in quam furtim inruens codicem suum inter eius plectas, quas de palmarum foliis solebat intexere, latenter abscondit, ac de concinnata factione securus ipse quoque uelut purae ac simplicis conscientiae ad ecclesiam uenit. cumque celebrata omnis fuisset ex more sollemnitas, querellam sancto Isidoro, qui ante hunc eundem Pafnutium eiusdem heremi presbyter fuit, coram cunctis fratribus detulit, adserens sibi codicem de cella furto fuisse sublatum. quae cum eius querimonia ita cunctorum fratrum praecipueque presbyteri animos permouisset, ut quid primum suspicarentur quidue decernerent non haberent, summa cunctis admiratione perculsis de tam inauditi illic facinoris nouitate, quippe quod nec ante illud tempus factum in illa heremo quis meminerat nec post aliquando conmissum est, ille qui rem detulerat accusator urguebat, ut retentis in ecclesia omnibus missi electi quique cunctorum singillatim fratrum cellulas scrutarentur. quod cum tribus senioribus a presbytero fuisset iniunctum, uniuersorum cubilia reuoluentes ad extremum in Pafnutii cellula absconditum codicem inter plectas palmarum, quas illi siras uocant, sicut eum insidiator occulerat, reppererunt quem cum inquisitores confestim ad ecclesiam delatum coram omnibus protulissent, Pafnutius, licet de conscientiae suae esset sinceritate securus, tamen uelut qui furti crimen agnosceret satisfactioni se totum tradens locum paenitentiae suppliciter postulauit, hoc uerecundiae suae modestiaeque prospiciens, ne si maculam furti uerbis conaretur abluere, insuper etiam mendacii notaretur, nemine scilicet aliud quam id quod inuentum fuerat suspicante. cumque de ecclesia non tam mente deiectus quam iudicio dei fidens protinus abscessisset, profusis in oratione iugiter lacrimis triplicatisque ieiuniis summa se etiam in conspectu hominum mentis humilitate prostrauit. sed cum duabus ferme ebdomadibus ita se omni contritione carnis ac spiritus subiecisset, ut die sabbati uel dominico non ad percipiendam communionem sacram, sed ad prosternendum se in limine ecclesiae atque ad ueniam suppliciter postulandam matutinus occurreret, nequaquam passus est eum occultorum omnium testis et cognitor uel a se amplius conteri uel ab aliis infamari. nam quod ille inuentor sceleris, rei suae fur inprobus, laudis alienae callidus infamator, nullo hominum teste conmiserat, per diabolum qui ipsius criminis incentor fuerat publicauit. adreptus namque dirissimo daemone cunctas factionis occultae patefecit insidias criminationumque ac fraudium idem fuit proditor qui commentor. ita autem spiritu illo inmundo grauiter diuque uexatus est, ut ne orationibus quidem sanctorum illic consistentium, qui diuinorum charismatum merito daemoniis imperabant, potuerit emundari, sed ne ipsius quidem Isidori presbyteri gratia singularis crudelissimum ab eo extruserit uexatorem, cui tanta erat uirtus domini largitate conlata, ut ne usque ad limina quidem eius quisquam adrepticius qui tardius sanaretur aliquando perductus sit, Christo hanc adulescenti Pafnutio gloriam reseruante, ut illius tantum orationibus cui insidiatus fuerat purgaretur, et cuius laudi aliquid inuidus inimicus decerpere se posse crediderat, eius nomen proclamans et delicti sui ueniam et finem supplicii praesentis acciperet. haec ergo ille in adulescentia sua futurae indolis iam tunc indicia praefigurans lineas quasdam perfectionis illius, quae erat maturitate aetatis augenda, adhuc in annis puerilibus designauit. si igitur ad culmen uirtutum eius uolumus peruenire, talia nobis exordiorum fundamenta iacienda sunt.
“Now let us set out another example, that of Abba Paphnutius. He always kept to the secret places of that famous and everywhere celebrated desert of Scete, where he is now presbyter, with such zeal that the other anchorites gave him the nickname ‘Buffalo,’ because with an inborn, so to speak, desire for solitude he always delighted in living alone. When in his boyhood he was of such virtue and grace that even the eminent and greatest men of that time admired his seriousness and unshakable constancy, and, though he was younger in age, put him on a level with the elders for the merit of his virtues and thought he should be admitted to their rank, that envy which once roused the brothers’ minds against the patriarch Joseph set one of the brothers on fire with the flame of jealousy. Wishing to disfigure his beauty with some blemish and stain, he devised this kind of malice: he watched for an opportunity when Paphnutius would be away from his cell going to church on the Lord’s day, secretly slipped into it, and hid his own book among the plaited mats which Paphnutius used to weave from palm leaves. Then, secure in the plot he had contrived, he too came to church as though his conscience were pure and simple. When the whole service had been celebrated as usual, he brought a complaint before all the brothers to Saint Isidore, who was presbyter of that desert before this same Paphnutius, declaring that his book had been stolen from his cell. This complaint so disturbed the minds of all the brothers, and especially of the presbyter, that they did not know what to suspect first or what to decide, all being struck with the greatest amazement at the novelty of a crime unheard of there; for no one remembered such a thing done in that desert before that time, nor was it ever committed afterward. The accuser who had raised the matter pressed that all should be kept in the church while chosen men were sent to search the cells of all the brothers one by one. When this had been assigned by the presbyter to three elders, they turned over everyone’s bedding and at last found the book in Paphnutius’s cell, hidden among the palm mats, which they call siras, just as the plotter had concealed it. When the searchers at once brought it to church and produced it before all, Paphnutius, although he was secure in the sincerity of his conscience, yet, as one who acknowledged the crime of theft, gave himself wholly to making satisfaction and humbly asked for a place of penance. In this he was looking to his modesty and shame, lest, if he tried to wash away the stain of theft by words, he should also be branded with lying, since no one suspected anything other than what had been found. He at once left the church, not so much downcast in mind as trusting in the judgment of God; and with tears poured out constantly in prayer and with fasts tripled, he prostrated himself with the greatest humility of mind even in the sight of men. When for nearly two weeks he had subjected himself with every contrition of flesh and spirit, so that on Saturday and Sunday he came early in the morning not to receive holy communion but to prostrate himself at the threshold of the church and humbly ask for pardon, he who is the witness and knower of all hidden things would by no means allow him to be crushed any longer by himself or defamed by others. For what that inventor of the crime, the shameless thief of his own property, the cunning defamer of another’s good name, had committed with no human witness, he made public through the devil, who had been the instigator of that very crime. He was seized by a most cruel demon and laid bare all the plots of his secret scheme, and the same man became the betrayer of the charges and frauds who had devised them. He was so severely and for so long tormented by that unclean spirit that he could not be cleansed even by the prayers of the saints who lived there, who by the merit of divine gifts had command over demons. Not even the singular grace of the presbyter Isidore himself drove out his most cruel tormentor, though so great a power had been given him by the Lord’s bounty that no possessed person brought even to his threshold was ever slow to be healed. For Christ was reserving this glory for the young Paphnutius, that the man should be cleansed only by the prayers of the one he had plotted against, and that, calling on the name of the one from whose praise the envious enemy had thought he could take something away, he should receive pardon for his offense and an end to his present punishment. So Paphnutius in his youth, already showing signs of his future character, traced, while still in his boyhood years, some outlines of that perfection which was to grow with maturity of age. If, then, we wish to reach the height of his virtues, we must lay such foundations at the beginning.”
Gen 37:4 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The young Paphnutius, falsely accused of theft by an envious monk, does penance in silence until the accuser, possessed by a demon, confesses and is healed only by Paphnutius’s prayers.
- Joseph and his brothers: Gen 37. Isidore was presbyter of Scete before Paphnutius; Paphnutius is the speaker of Conference 3.
- “A place of penance” (locum paenitentiae): the church’s public penitential discipline, under which Paphnutius abstained from communion.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (g for s); OCR slip (l for i); OCR slip (m for in); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slip and joined words; stray colon; stray full stop; stray full stop inside a word; stray marks and OCR slip (m for n); two words joined in the digital text): ut. ei ceteri → ut ei ceteri; ganderet → gauderet; pneritia → pueritia; aduereus → aduersus; edacierzeli → edaci zeli; Pafiautius → Pafnutius; a cella. m quam → a cella. in quam; Pafnutiug → Pafnutius; nam. quod → nam quod; cunotas → cunctas; crimina.tionumque → criminationumque; ut: ne usque → ut ne usque; adulescenti I Pafnutio gloriam reseruamte, -ut → adulescenti Pafnutio gloriam reseruante, ut; oni insidiatus → cui insidiatus; cnios laudi → cuius laudi; delicti sai → delicti sui; haec ergo llle → haec ergo ille; fnwrae → futurae; lineas quasdam. perfectionis → lineas quasdam perfectionis; exordiorumfundamenta → exordiorum fundamenta.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 18.15 (CSEL 13:523–526; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/18-15/#p-18-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-18-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
18.16CSEL 13:526–533
Duplex sane ad narrationem huius facti causa me conpulit, primum ut hanc immobilitatem uiri constantiamque pensantes, quanto minoribus inimici inpugnamur insidiis, tanto maiorem tranquillitatis atque patientiae sumamus affectum, deinde ut - firma definitione teneamus a temptationem procellis inpugnationibusque diaboli tutos nos esse non posse, si omne praesidium patientiae nostrae omnemque fiduciam non in interioris hominis nostri uiribus, sed in cellulae claustris aut in solitudinis recessu sanctorumue consortio uel cuiusquam quae extra nos sit rei praesidio conlocemus. nisi enim mentem nostram uirtute protectionis suae-ille firmauerit qui in euangelio ait: regnum dei intra nos est, frustra aērii hostis insidias aut; auxilio: cohabitantium hominum uincere aut localibus spatiis declinare a aut munitione tectorum excludere posse - nos credimus. nam cum haec omnia sancto Pafnutio non deessent, non tamen inpugnationis aditum aduersus eum temptator inuenire non; potuit,. neque illum nequissimum spiritum saepta parietum aut heremi solitudo aut tot in illa congregatione sanctorum merita reppulerunt. sed quia sanctus dei famulus non in his quae extrinsecus sunt, sed in ipso occultorum omnium iudice spem sui cordis adfixerat, tantae inpugnationis machinis potuit commoueri. e contra ille quem ad tantum facinus. praecipitauit inuidia, nonne et solitudinis beneficio et munitione remotioris habitaculi et beati Isidori abbatis atque presbyteri aliorumque sanctorum consortio fruebatur? et tamen quia eum supra harenam repperit turbo diabolicus, non solum inpegit eius, uerum etiam subuertit habitaculum. non ergo quietem nostram extrinsecus inquiramus nec opitulari uitiis inpatientiae nostrae alienam putemus posse patientiam. sicut enim regnum dei intra nos est, ita inimici hominis domestici eius. nemo enim mihi magis quam sensus meus, qui mihi est uere intimus domesticus, aduersatur. et idcirco si fuerimus solliciti, ab intestinis hostibus laedi minime poterimus. ubi enim nobis nostri domestici non aduersantur, ibi et regnum dei in tranquillitate mentis adquiritur. nam si rationem diligenter excutias, laedi ab homine quamuis malignante non potero, I si ipse inpatienti aduersum me corde non dimicem. si autem laedor, non est uitium inpugnationis alienae, sed inpatientiae meae. sicut enim grauis ac solidus cibus sano utilis, ita perniciosus est aegrotanti. non autem laedere sumentem potest, nisi ei ad nocendum uires adiecerit percipientis infirmitas. si umquam ergo similis inter fratres fuerit oborta temptatio, nequaquam a cursu tranquillitatis excussi blasphemis saecularium obtrectationibus aditum reseremus nec peruersos atque execrabiles quosque sanctorum uirorum numero insertos latitare miremur, quia, dum in huius saeculi area conculcamur atque conterimur, necesse est etiam paleas igni perpetuo deputandas inter electissima frumenta misceri denique si ad satanan inter angelos uel Iudam inter apostolos uel Nicolaum prauissimae haereseos inuentorem inter diaconos reminiscamur electos, hoc, quod nequissimi homines sanctorum ordini deprehenduntur inserti, mirum esse non poterit. nam licet hose Nicolaum quidam adserant non illum fuisse qui ad opus ministerii ab apostolis est electus, nihilominus tamen eum de illo discipulorum fuisse numero negare non possunt, quos omnes tales tamque perfectos id temporis fuisse manifestum est, quales nunc perpaucos uix in coenobiis inuenimus. non ergo ruinam illius supra dicti fratris, qui in illa heremo tam lugubri lapsus est casu, neque illam horribilem maculam, quam tamen ille ingentibus paenitentiae lacrimis post deleuit, sed beati potius Pafnutii nobis proponamus exempla, nec subuersione illius destruamur cuius antiquum inuidiae uitium etiam auxit in peius adfectata religio, sed huius humilitatem tota uirtute sectemur, quam non illi quies heremi subito genuit, sed inter homines adquisitam consummauit atque excoluit solitudo. sciendum sane est inuidiae morbum difficilius ad medellam quam cetera uitia peruenire. nam eum quem semel ueneni sui peste corruperit paene dixerim carere remedio. ipsa namque est lues de qua figuraliter dicitur per prophetam: ecce ego mittam uobis serpentes regulos, quibus non est incantatio: et mordebunt uos. recte igitur a propheta mortiferis basilisci uenenis morsus inuidiae conparantur, qua primus ille omnium uenenorum auctor et princeps et periit et peremit. nam ante suus quam eius cui inuiderat interemptor priusquam in hominem mortis uirus effunderet, ipse se perdidit: inuidia enim diaboli mors introiuit in orbem terrarum: imitantur ergo illum qui sunt ex parte eius. sicut enim ille qui primus eiusdem mali peste corruptus est nec medellam paenitentiae nec fomentum ullius curationis admisit, ita et hi qui isdem se percutiendos morsibus tradiderunt omnem opem sancti incantatoris excludunt, quia cum utique non culpa eorum quibus liuent, sed prosperitate crucientur, erubescentes ipsam prodere ueritatem extrinsecus sibi quasdam superfluas et ineptas causas offensionis inquirunt: quarum, quia omnimodis falsae sunt, uana curatio est, cum illud mortiferum uirus quod nolunt prodere lateat in medullis. de quibus sapientissimus ille conpetenter expressit: si momorderit serpens non in sibilo, non est abundantia incantatori. isti enim sunt taciti morsus quibus solis sapientium medicina non subuenit. nam usque adeo incurabilis est ista pernicies, ut blandimentis exasperetur, infletur obsequiis, muneribus inritetur, quia, ut idem Salomon ait, nihil sustinet zelus. quanto enim amplius alius aut humilitatis subiectione aut patientiae uirtute aut munificentiae laude profecerit, tanto ille maioribus inuidiae stimulis incitatur, quia non nisi ruinam aut mortem eius cui inuidet concupiscit. denique illorum undecim patriarcharum zelus in tantum nulla innoxii fratris subiectione potuit deleniri, ut de his scriptura commemoret: inuidebant autem ei fratres sui, eo quod diligeret eum pater suus, et non poterant ei loqui quicquam pacificum, donec zelus eorum, qui nulla germani obsequentis atque subiecti sustinuit blandimenta, mortem eius cupiens uix posset uenditionis fraternae crimine satiari. cunctis ergo uitiis perniciosiorem atque ad purgandum difficiliorem esse constat inuidiam, quae ipsis remediis quibus reliqua extinguntur accenditur. nam uerbi gratia qui damnum sibi inlatum dolet, largitatis conpensatione curatur: qui de inlata indignatur iniuria, humili satisfactione placatur. quid illo facias, qui hoc ipso magis quod te humiliorem ac benigniorem sentit offenditur, quem non ad iracundiam cupiditas, quae praemio delenitur, non iniuriae laesio aut amor ultionis accendit, quae officiorum uincitur blandimentis, sed successus tantum alienae felicitatis inritat? quis autem est qui se, ut satisfaciat inuidenti, a bonis corruere aut a prosperis alienari aut a calamitate aliqua optet inuolui? quapropter ne totum, quidquid in nobis uiuidum est et quasi uitali uegetatione sancti spiritus animatum, uno tanti huius mali morsu basiliscus interimat, diuinum cui inpossibile nihil est iugiter inploremus auxilium. cetera enim uenena serpentum, id est carnalia peccata uel uitia, a quibus ut cito inuoluitur, ita facile expurgatur humana fragilitas, habent aliqua uulnerum suorum in carne uestigia, quibus quamuis terrenum corpus perniciosissime contumescat, tamen si theriacae remedium aut illam salutarium uerborum medellam aliquis peritissimus carminum diuinorum incantator admouerit, ad perpetuam animae mortem pernicies uirulenta non peruenit: inuidiae autem quasi a regulo serpente effusum uirus uitam ipsam religionis ac fidei, priusquam uulnus in corpore sentiatur, excludit. non enim aduersus hominem, sed plane aduersus deum blasphemus extollitur, qui nihil in fratre aliud nisi felicitatem carpens non hominis culpam, sed dei tantum iudicia reprehendit. haec ergo est illa sursum germinans amaritudinis radix, quae se erigens ad superna ad contumeliam ipsius qui bona homini confert tendit auctoris. nec quemquam moueat quod deus missurum se serpentes regulos, qui eos quorum criminibus offenditur mordeant, conminatur. nam licet certum sit deum auctorem inuidiae esse non posse, aequum tamen et diuino dignum iudicio est, ut dum bona data humilibus conferuntur et superbis ac reprobis denegantur, eos qui secundum apostolum tradi in reprobum sensum merentur quasi ab ipso missa percutiat et consumat inuidia secundum illud: ipsi me ad aemulationem inritauerunt in non deo: et ego ad aemulationem inducam eos in non gente. Hac beatus Piamun desiderium nostrum, quo de primis coenobii scolis ad secundum anachoreseos gradum tendere coeperamus, disputatione ardentius inflammauit nam primordia solitariae commorationis, cuius scientiam postea sumus Scitii plenius adsecuti, ipso primum iabaeate suscepimus.
“A twofold reason moved me to tell this story. First, that weighing this man’s steadiness and constancy, we may take up a greater disposition of tranquillity and patience in proportion as the snares with which the enemy attacks us are smaller. Second, that we may hold as a firm principle that we cannot be safe from the storms of temptation and the assaults of the devil if we place all the defense of our patience and all our confidence not in the strength of our inner man but in the enclosure of our cells, the retreat of solitude, the company of the saints, or the protection of anything outside ourselves. For unless he who says in the Gospel, ‘The kingdom of God is within you,’ strengthens our mind by the power of his protection, we believe in vain that we can overcome the snares of the enemy of the air by the help of the men who live with us, or avoid them by distance of place, or shut them out by the defense of roofs. For although none of these things was lacking to holy Paphnutius, the tempter nevertheless did find a way to attack him, and neither the enclosure of walls, nor the solitude of the desert, nor the merits of so many saints in that community drove off that most wicked spirit. But because the holy servant of God had fixed the hope of his heart not on things outside but on the judge of all hidden things himself, he could not be moved by the engines of so great an assault. On the other hand, did not the man whom envy hurled into so great a crime enjoy the benefit of solitude, the protection of a more remote dwelling, and the company of the blessed abba and presbyter Isidore and the other saints? Yet because the devil’s whirlwind found him built on the sand, it not only struck his house but overthrew it. Let us not, then, seek our peace outside ourselves, nor think that another’s patience can help the faults of our impatience. For just as the kingdom of God is within us, so ‘a man’s enemies are those of his own household.’ For no one opposes me more than my own mind, which is truly the most intimate member of my household. So if we are watchful, we can by no means be harmed by enemies within. For where the members of our own household do not oppose us, there the kingdom of God too is gained in tranquillity of mind. For if you examine the matter carefully, I cannot be harmed by any man, however malicious, if I do not fight against myself with an impatient heart. If I am harmed, the fault is not in another’s attack but in my own impatience. For just as heavy and solid food is useful to the healthy but harmful to the sick, it cannot harm the one who takes it unless the weakness of the one receiving it gives it the power to do harm. If, then, a similar temptation ever arises among the brothers, let us by no means be shaken from the course of our tranquillity and open the way to the blasphemous slanders of worldly people; nor let us wonder that some perverse and detestable men lurk hidden among the number of holy men. For while we are trodden and threshed on the threshing floor of this world, it must be that chaff destined for eternal fire is mixed in with the choicest wheat. Finally, if we remember that Satan was chosen among the angels, Judas among the apostles, and Nicolaus, the inventor of a most depraved heresy, among the deacons, it cannot be surprising that the most wicked men are found enrolled in the ranks of the saints. For although some say that this Nicolaus was not the one who was chosen by the apostles for the work of ministry, they still cannot deny that he was of the number of the disciples, all of whom, it is clear, were at that time such and so perfect as we now scarcely find a very few in the coenobia. Let us then set before ourselves not the fall of the brother mentioned above, who slipped so lamentably in that desert, nor that horrible stain, which he afterward washed away with great tears of repentance, but rather the example of blessed Paphnutius. Let us not be destroyed by the overthrow of the one whose old vice of envy an affected piety only made worse, but let us follow with all our strength the humility of the other, which the quiet of the desert did not suddenly produce in him, but which, acquired among men, solitude perfected and refined. It must be recognized, indeed, that the disease of envy comes to a cure with more difficulty than other vices. For I might almost say that one whom it has once corrupted with the plague of its poison is without remedy. For this is the plague of which it is said figuratively through the prophet: ‘Behold, I will send among you basilisk serpents, which cannot be charmed, and they shall bite you.’ Rightly, then, does the prophet compare the bites of envy to the deadly poison of the basilisk, by which the first author and prince of all poisons both perished and caused others to perish. For he destroyed himself before the one he envied, and ruined himself before he poured the poison of death into man; ‘for through the envy of the devil death entered into the world, and those who are on his side imitate him.’ For as he who was first corrupted by the plague of this evil admitted neither the remedy of repentance nor the salve of any cure, so those who have given themselves up to be struck by the same bites shut out all the help of the holy charmer. For since they are tormented not by the fault of those they envy but by their prosperity, they are ashamed to reveal the truth itself and look outside themselves for superfluous and foolish causes of offense. Since these are altogether false, curing them is in vain, while that deadly poison which they will not reveal lies hidden in their marrow. Of them that wisest man fittingly said: ‘If a serpent bites without hissing, there is no advantage for the charmer.’ For these are the silent bites for which alone the medicine of the wise is of no help. For this ruin is so incurable that it is aggravated by kindness, swollen by services, and provoked by gifts, since, as the same Solomon says, ‘Jealousy endures nothing.’ The more another advances in humble submission, in the virtue of patience, or in the praise of generosity, the more is the envious man spurred by greater stings of envy, since he desires nothing but the ruin or death of the one he envies. So the jealousy of those eleven patriarchs could not be softened by any submission of their innocent brother, so that Scripture records of them: ‘His brothers envied him because his father loved him, and they could not speak anything peaceable to him,’ until their jealousy, which could bear no kindnesses from an obedient and submissive brother, desiring his death, could scarcely be satisfied by the crime of selling their brother. It is clear, then, that envy is more pernicious than all the vices and harder to purge, since it is inflamed by the very remedies that extinguish the others. For example, one who grieves at a loss inflicted on him is cured by generous compensation; one who is indignant at an injury is appeased by humble satisfaction. What can you do with one who is offended precisely because he feels you are humbler and kinder, whom neither covetousness, which is soothed by a reward, nor the hurt of an injury or the love of revenge, which is overcome by kind services, moves to anger, but only the success of another’s happiness provokes? Who is there who would wish, in order to satisfy one who envies him, to fall from his goods, or be deprived of his prosperity, or be involved in some calamity? Therefore, lest the basilisk kill with one bite of so great an evil all that is alive in us and, as it were, animated by the life-giving vigor of the Holy Spirit, let us constantly implore the divine help, to which nothing is impossible. For the other poisons of serpents, that is, carnal sins or vices, in which human frailty is as quickly entangled as it is easily purged, leave some traces of their wounds in the flesh; and although the earthly body swells with them most perniciously, yet if some most skilled charmer of divine songs applies the remedy of an antidote or the medicine of saving words, the virulent evil does not come to the eternal death of the soul. But the poison of envy, as though poured out by the basilisk serpent, destroys the very life of religion and faith before any wound is felt in the body. For the one who carps at nothing in his brother but his happiness is lifted up in blasphemy not against a man but plainly against God, and finds fault not with the man’s guilt but only with God’s judgments. This, then, is that root of bitterness springing up, which, raising itself on high, reaches to the insult of the very author who bestows good things on man. Nor let it disturb anyone that God threatens to send basilisk serpents to bite those by whose crimes he is offended. For although it is certain that God cannot be the author of envy, it is still just and worthy of the divine judgment that, when good gifts are bestowed on the humble and denied to the proud and reprobate, envy, as though sent by him, should strike and consume those who, according to the apostle, deserve to be handed over to a reprobate mind, according to the word: ‘They provoked me to jealousy with what is not God, and I will provoke them to jealousy with what is not a nation.’” With this discourse blessed Piamun inflamed more ardently our desire, by which we had begun to strive from the first school of the coenobium toward the second grade of anachoresis. For it was under his instruction that we first took up the beginnings of the solitary life, whose knowledge we afterward gained more fully in Scete.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 3:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 6:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 8:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 10:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 27:4 (quotation, medium confidence) · Gen 37:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 1:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 32:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Piamun concludes that peace must be found within, not in solitude or good company, warns that envy is the most incurable vice, and so fires Cassian and Germanus with desire for the solitary life.
- Luke 17:21; Matt 10:36; the chaff and the wheat, Matt 3:12; Nicolaus, Acts 6:5, identified by some ancient writers with the Nicolaitans of Rev 2:6, 15; Jer 8:17 (in the Greek/Latin form, “basilisk serpents”); Eccl 10:11; “Jealousy endures nothing,” Prov 27:4 in the Greek form; Gen 37:4; the root of bitterness, Heb 12:15; a reprobate mind, Rom 1:28; Deut 32:21.
- “Through the envy of the devil death entered into the world”: Wis 2:24–25.
- The digital text reads “potuit commoueri” (“could be moved”) where the sense requires “could not be moved”; translated by sense. The last word of the section (iabaeate) is corrupt in the digital text; “under his instruction” is translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for o); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (h for n); OCR slip (hi for in); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slip (o for u); OCR slip and joined words; OCR slip and stray full stop; OCR slips; doubled full stop; joined words and OCR slip; stray full stops and OCR slip; stray mark splitting a word; two words joined; word repeated with a stray mark in the digital text): inpugnationibusqne → inpugnationibusque; non poesa,. → non posse,; non hi interioris → non in interioris; in cellulae claustris ant in → in cellulae claustris aut in; sanctoramue → sanctorumue; nam eum haec emnla → nam cum haec omnia; inpughationis → inpugnationis; epiritum → spiritum; sanotus → sanctus; extrinsecussunt → extrinsecus sunt; potuit|potuit → potuit; dtmeatious → domesticus; inpacHaco → inpatienti; iupugnataonis → inpugnationis; pernieioeus eat → perniciosus est; uires. adiecerit. pereipientis → uires adiecerit percipientis; insertes → insertos; dmn in → dum in; fromenta → frumenta; ai ad satanan inter angelos vel Iodam inter apostolos oel Nieolaom → si ad satanan inter angelos uel Iudam inter apostolos uel Nicolaum; reminiseamar → reminiscamur; non illam fuisse → non illum fuisse; eletusnihilominus tameneum → electus, nihilominus tamen eum; anzit → auxit; innidiae morbum difficiiins → inuidiae morbum difficilius; remedio.. ipsa → remedio. ipsa; lande profeoerit → laude profecerit; eius eni inuidet → eius cui inuidet; fratres sai → fratres sui; iniuriae laesio ant amor → iniuriae laesio aut amor; conrnere ant → corruere aut; peceata → peccata; ex* purgatur → expurgatur; quieos → qui eos; coeparamusdisputatione → coeperamus, disputatione.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 2:24 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 18.16 (CSEL 13:526–533; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/18-15/#p-18-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-18-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).