Church History 1.7.17
Summary: Since the law required marriage within one's tribe, Mary too was of Joseph's tribe.
Greek text · Dindorf 4:28–29
καὶ δὴ τοῦ Ἰωσὴφ ὧδέ πως γενεαλογουμένου, δυνάμει καὶ ἡ Μαρία σὺν αὐτῷ πέφηνεν ἐκ τῆς αὐτῆς οὖσα φυλῆς, εἴ γε κατὰ τὸν Μωυσέως νόμον οὐκ ἐξῆν ἑτέραις ἐπιμίγνυσθαι φυλαῖς· ἑνὶ γὰρ τῶν ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ δήμου καὶ πατριᾶς τῆς αὐτῆς ξευγνυσθαι πρὸς γάμον παρακελεύεται ὡς ἂν μὴ περιστρέφοιτο τοῦ γένους ὁ κλῆρος ἀπὸ φυλῆς ἐπὶ φυλήν. ὡδὶ μὲν οὖν καὶ ταῦτα ἐχέτω.
English · Claude translation
And since Joseph's genealogy is traced in this way, Mary too is implicitly shown to be of the same tribe as he, since by the law of Moses it was not permitted to intermarry with other tribes; for it commands to be joined in marriage with one of the same district and the same family, so that the inheritance of the family might not pass from tribe to tribe. Let this, too, be as it is.
About this passage
Notes
Translation notes
- Allusion to Num 36:6–9.
Cite this passage
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 1.7.17 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/1/7/17/).
Plain text
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 1.7.17 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/1/7/17/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text