Commentary on Matthew 5–6

Latin text: Migne, PL 9 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 5

5PL 9:941–951

Clauso quoque cubiculi ostio jubemur orare, atque in omni loco precem fundere edocemur: el sanctorum oratio inter feras, carceres, flammas, et de profundo maris ac bestiæ ventre suscepta est. Ergo non occulta domus, sed cordis nostri ctibiculum ingredi, et clauso mentis nostræ secreto orare ad Deum, non multiloquio, sed conscienlia admonemur, quia dictorum verbis opus omne pnccellal. De orationis autem sacramenlo necessitate nos commentandi Cyprianus vir sanctæ memoriæ liberavit. Quamquam et Tertullianus hinc volumen aptissimum scripserit: sed consequens error hominis, detraxit scriptis probabilibus auctoritatem. Cum autem jejunatis, notile fieri sicnt hypocritæ tristes: exterminant enim facies suas, ut pareant hominibusjejunantes, etc.. Jejuniorum profectum docet extra jactantiam confecti corporis esse oportere, neque de injuriæ osleniatione favorem gentium consectandum; sed omne jejunium in sanctæ operations decore ponendum. Oleum enim fructum misericordiæ esse, coelestis ei propheticus sermo est. Ergo bonitatis operibus caput nostrum, id est, vitæ nostræ sensus ornandus esi; quia intelligentia omnis in capite est: sordesque in facic abluendæ, ne quid sithorroris ex vitiis, sed magis gratia candoris sit in occursu: atque ita nos in splendorem bonce conscientix elutos, ct in gratiam misericordis operis delibutos, Deo jejunia nostra coimnendent. Ca'terum fugientes in jejuniis hominum conscientiam unctis capilibus, et ridiculi magis erimus, ct cogniti. Nolite thesaurizare vobis thesauros in terra, et reliqua. Prætermissa igitur humanae gloi ix et opulentix sollicitudine, omnem placcndi Deo curam sumi oportere demonstrat: quia humanam laudem vel corporum vitia, vet obtrectatio invidentium corrumpat; et hie thesaurus pecuniæ, aut detrimento sit periculosus, aut furto. cæierum laus cœlestis æterna est, nee subrepeniis furto subtrahenda, ncc tinea aut rubiginc invidix exedenda: corde nostro sedem tliesauri utram sit seculum habituro, et intelligentiæ nostrae lumine aut cum pecunia damnosa futuro, aut cum Deo scmpiterno. Lucema corporis tui est oculus tuus. Continens sensus est. De oculi enim Iuminis officio lumen cordis expressit. Quod si simplex el lucidum manebit; claritatein æterni luminis corpori tribuet, et splendorem originis suae corrnptioni carnis inrundet. Si autem obscurum peccalis, ct voluntate erit nequam; vitiis mentis natura corporis subjacebit. Et si lumen, quod in nobis est, tenebrosum sit; quantas necesse est ipsarum tenebras esse tenebrarum? quia jam periculose so leat animi generositati terrenae carnis vitiosa origo dominari, longeque magis peccata corporum ingravescere, si etiam cupiditatibus adjuventur animo-. rum: ex coque fieri præter naturam suam corpora nostra tenebrosa, si in illis mentium lumen eistinctum sit; quod si per simplicitatein spiritus retinuerimus, lumine suo necesse est ct corpus illumincl. Nemo potest duobus dominis servire, etc.. Duum dominorum infldelc servitium est, nec par cjusdem potest esse ad saeculum atque ad Deum cura. In alterum enim necesse est odium sit, in alteram amor: quia idem opus diversae dominorum non conveniat voluntati, nec pauperes spiritu Deo placeutes ambitiosæ sæculi hujus possint apti esse jactantiæ. Ideo dico vobis, ne cogitetis in corde vestro, quid manducetis; neque corpori vestro, quid vestiatis. Nonne anima vestra pluris est quam esca, et corpus pturis est quam vestimentum? Conlemplum sæculi, ct fiduciam futurorum toto superiore sermone præceperat. Nam cum ad injuriam pronos jubet esse, et ad damnum voluntarios, et ad ullionem negligentes, et ad diligendum promiscuos, etad humanam gloriam incuriosos; confirmari nos in spein bonorum æternorum laborat. Plures enim et amor pnesentium, et desperatio futurorum incertos facit: et aut illecebris capit, aut infidelitate confundit: Ergo regnum coelorum, quod prophetae nuntiaverunt, Joannes prædicavit, Dominus noster in se esse posttum est professus, vult sine aliqua incertae voluntatis ambiguitate sperari: alioquin justificalio ex fide nulla est, si fides ipsa fiat ambigua. Igilur curam nullam esse vestitus et cibi præcipit, dicens et escis animam, ct cilio corpus esse pretiosius. Et quidem pulchrum est, præsentium rerum contemptu, curam tantum divinis rebus impendere: sed aliius sermo descendit, et in cœlestis dicti intelligentiam verbis subjecta ratio extenditur. Thesaurum Dominus condi jussit in cœlo, et ex oculi lumine corpori quoque splendorem spopondit, et dominis duobus neminem placere posse testatus est: ct post hæc ait: Ideo dico vobis, ne cogitetis in corde vestro, quid manducetis; neque corpori vestro, quid induatis. Quae consequuntur, non satis propositionibus congrunnL. Numquid et unius domini servus non possit circa vestem esse cibumque sollicitus? Numquid per adversam valetudinem hebelaio oculi lumine obscurabitur corpus? aut quod corporis lumen esse possit ex oculo? Numquid thesaurizare in cœlis sola nuditas aut fames poterit? Sed quia corruptus circa futurorum curam infidelium sensus est, calumnianliumquse in resurrectione corporum species sit futura, quæ in substantiam acternitatis alimonia; etcum ex difficultatibus quaestionum inutilium, quædam utendarum praesentium voluptatum ratio quaesita est, inutili metu circa Dei reverentiam demoranLes, in sæculi gaudia Iranseunt; atque ita est, ut duobus dominis unius infidele servilium sit: igitur ex summo pietatis affectu, gravissimo diffidentiae periculo ante prsedicto, ita admonet: Nonne anima pluris est quam esca, et corpus pluris est quam vestimentum? In dictis Dei veritas est, et rerum creandarum efficientia omnis in verbo est. Ita nee quod spopondit ambiguum est, nec inefficax quod locutus est. Nihil est quod non in substantia sua et crealione corporcum sit: et omnium, sive in coelo sive in terra, sive visibilium sive invisibilium, elementa formata sunt. Nam et animarum species, sive obtinentiuin corpora, sive corporibus exsulantium, corpoream tamen naturæ suae substantiam sortiuntur; quia omne quod creatum eM, in altqtto sit necesse eat. Atque ideo ineptiam inutilissimæ quæstionis Deus arguens, non patitur, anima et corpore in æternitatis substantia collocandis, spem nostram futuri in resurrectione cibi et vestitus sollicitudine demorari t ne tanto pretiosa reddenti, corpus scilicet atque animam, contumelia in non elflciendis levioribus inferatur. Respicite volatilia cœli, quoniam non serunt, neque congregant in horrea: et pater vesier cœlestis pascit illa. Nonne vos magis pluris estis? Sub nomine volucrum exemplo nos immundorum spirltuum adhortaiur: quibus sine aliquo negotio quærendi el congregandi, vivendi tameu tribuitur de aeterni consilii potestate substantia. Atque ut ad immundos istud spiritus referri oportere monstraret, adjecit: Nonnt vos magis pluris estis illis? de comparationis præstantia, diserimen nequitiae et sanctitatis ostendens. Quis autem vestrum polett adjicere ad staturam suam cubiium unum? Et de vestimento quid solliciti estis? Fidein vitatis substantiæ nostra; do documento spirituum firinavit: opinionem autem habitus futuri, iudicio communis intelligentiæ dereli. quit. Cum enim univeisorum corporum, quae vitam hauserint, diversitatem in unum consummnium virum perfectumque sit excitaturus, solusque potens sit ad uniuscujusque procerilatetn cubituin unum et alterum lettiumve prsestare, de vestitu, id est, de specie corporum, cum quanta ejus contumelia ambigimus t qui ut aequalem atque uniformem omnem hominem efficiat, tahtum ntensura; sit humanis cot poribus additurus. Considerate lilia agri quomodo crescunt; non laborant, neque nent. Dico autem vobis, quoniam net Salomon in omni gloria sua coopertus est sicut unum ex istis, etc.. Lilia non laborant, neque nent: et Salomon coopertus eorum gloria non fuit, propheta magnus, et merito dilectæ sapientiæ Deo carus. Sed lilia nascuntur potius, quam operiuntur. Coopertio autem velamentum est Corporis, non corpus ipsum. Quod si ad sensum humanæ intelligentiæ refertur, colorem filii, velameitti candor potueratæmulari. Sed lilia non laborantia neqUe nentia sighiflcari intelligenda sunt angelorum cœlestium claritates, quibus extra humanæ scientiæ eruditionem, suique operis mercedem, a Deo gloriæ candor indultus est: ne quid ex proprio labore aut arte existimarentur habuisse. Et cum in resurrectione similes homines Angelis erunt, sperare nos coelestis gloriæ voluit operlmentum, exemplo angelicæ claritatis. Est antem In natura istius germinis, ut aptlsslme coelestibus Angelorum substantiis comparetur. Hoc enim effiorescens, cum a stirpe detentæ humi radicis avellltur, natura; suae virtutem licet aruisse putetur occultat, et redeunte tempore rursum filii sui honore vestitur. Ex se enim efflorescit ac redditur; et quod est, nee radici potest debere nee terrae: cum ille qui se subeat succus, ex se sit. Atque ita annua licet hujus viriditatis exemplo, virtutem suae coelestis substantiæ æmutatur: cum ex eo tantum, quod intra se acceptuin babeat, alatur in florem. Ideo ergo lilia non laborani, neque nent: quia Virlutes angelorum, ex ea quam adeplæ sunt originis suae horte, ut sint semper accipiant. Si enim fœnum agri, quod hodie est, el erat in ignem mittitur, Deus sic vestit; quanto magis vos modicœ fidei? Fidei nostræ inviolabilem confldenliam exemplorum auctoritate confirmat: ut tanto majoris periculi res sit ambigere, quanto impensiore cura omnem occasionem infidelitatis abstulerit. Foenum non idcirco nascitur, ut detur igni; neque ideo vestiendi ejus peculiaris Deo cura est, ut cremetur; sed sub fceni nomine nuncupatas esse a Deo gentes, crebro invenimus. Germen autem illud est, quod virtutis suae Core dilapso, ad calorem solis arescit. Igilur requies nulla gentibus, neque mortis, ut volunt, compendio quies dabitur: sed corporalis et ipsis aelernitas deslinabilur ut ignis aeterni in ipsis sil æterna materies, ct in universis sempiternis exerceatur ultio sempiterna. Si igitur gentibus idcirco tantum indulgetur æternitas corporalis, ut mox igni judicii destinentur; quam profanum est, sanctos de gloria æternitatis ambigere, cum iniquis aeternitatis opus præstetur ad poenam. Omnem igitur exspectationem nostram in fide repromissionum et virtutis suae potestate exigit collocari: ut cura rerum quibuB indi Remus omissa, ab eo potius omnia, a quo ipsi vitale exordium sumpsimus, exspectemus, regnumque Dei vitae nostræ stipendiis quæramus. Et haec recte perfecteque viventium merces est, ut in novam cœlestemque substantiam ex hac corruptibilis corporis materie transferantur, et corruptio terrena cœlesti incorruptione muteiur. Gentium igitur est, infidelitatis istius cura angi: quibus sæculi amoredetenlis, et corporis gaudiis occupatis, nullum per (idem et couressionein Dei in cœleste regnum iter quacritur et optatur. Nolite ergo solliciti esse de crastino. Crastinus enim dies sollicitus erit sibi ipse. Suffici diei malitia sua. Commune iudicium est,diem esse labentium temporum cursum luce solis illuminatum, quem nox interjecta discriminat, et interventu suo diei diem subrogat: futuri autem temporis significantia continetur in crastino. Ergo de futuro sollicitos nos esse Deus vetuit. Incuria autem sollicitudinis relaxatæ, non negligentiæ, sed fidei est. Cur enim solliciti simus in crastino; cum crastinus dies sibi ipse sollicitus sit? Ergo anxietatem nostram ipsa pro nobis dies sollicita depellit. Sed sollicitudo, ut arbitror, proprius est hominis affectus: hanc enim excitat aut curæ, aut me.tus, aut doloris anxietas. Dies vero cursus est temporis: el sola providentiam cousecuia solliciiudinis recipiunt affectum. Constituetur ergo dies esse animat, quod el caveat, et prospicial, et curet; cui eL malitia propria sufflciat, neque extrinsecus accidenti sit cumulanda peccato. Sed natura rei non capit, diei depntare mentis affectum: ergo et quod sibi ipsa sollicita est, et quod ei malitia sua sufficit, et quod inbibemur sollicili esse de crastino; totum sub dictis cœlestis significantiæ continetur. Jubemur igitur non ambigere de futuris; saiisenim vitæ nostræ malitia, et dierum quibus vivimus peccata sufficiunt, ut circa bsec purganda el promerenda omnis vitæ nostræ meditatio laborque versetur, ne etiam de futurorum diffidentia inexpiabilis irreligiosilas contrabatur: cum cessante cura nostra, ipsa in officio suo, quo sunt futura, sollicita sint, et nobis æternæ claritmis profectus, Dei procurante bonitate, jam non sollicitis præparetur. Nolile judicare, ne judicemini. Quo enim iudicio judicaveritis, judicabitur de vobis. Omnc judicii officium penitus Deus submovet, nec ullum omnino suscipi patitur. Sed compugnare propositis subsequentia existimautur, cum dicit: Quo iudicio judicaveritis, judicabitur de vobis. Sed superius ait: Nolite judicare, ne judicemini. Numquid boni judicii arbitrium suscipi non oportebit? Atquin profitetur pro conditione judicii judicandos, el universis genere quo mensi sunt metiendum. Ergo numquam bene judicabitur, si omnino non erit judicandum. Sed jam dudum, ut superius cognoscitur, nihil Ih verbis Dei leve aut inane tractatur: otnnisqne hie ultra sensum gentilium nurium sermo est. Judicari enim de sponsionibus suis vetuit: quia ut judicia ex incertis rebus inter homines sumuntur, ita et hoc judicium adversum Deum ex sentiendi atque opinundi ambiguitate suscipitur. quod penitus repellit a nobis, utconstans potius fides retineatur; quia noh sicut in rebus cæteris, peccatum sit perperam judicasse; sed in his rebus tantummodo de Deo iudicium, initium esse sit criminis. Quid autem vides festucam in oculo fratris tui, et trabem in oculo tuo non vides, et reliqua? In consequentibus docuit, solam in Spiritum blasphemfam extra veniam futuram, cæteris omnibus Deo indulgentiam largiente. Peccatum autem in Spiritum est, Deo virtutis potestaiem negare, et Christo substantiam adimerc æternitatis: per quem, quia in hominem Deus venit, homo rursum fiet in Deum. Ergo quantum inter festucam et trabem discriminis est, tantum ostendit peccatum in Spiritum condiilonem cæterorum criminum excedere: ut cum infideles delicta corporis aliis exprobrenL, onus peccati quo de promissis Dei ambigant, in se ante non videant, infidelitalis. trabe in oculo tamquam in mentis acie insidente. Fit enim saepe, ut assumamus nobis arguendi alios auctoritatem, sine ullo propria; emendationis exemplo; et medendæ cæcitatis alienæ jaclantium præferamus, ipsi in teuebris corrupii luminis constiluli: cum difficile quemquamsit præstare quod egeat, et optimum sit exemplo potius docere quam dictis. Cura erga proprisc adhibenda est cæcitati: quia ex natura rerum est, non prius aliquem purgandæ de oculo fratris fstucæ idoneum effici posse doctorem, quam de mentis suae lumine trabem perfidiæ gravantes ejecerit.

We are also commanded to pray with the door of our room shut, and we are taught to pour out prayer in every place: and the prayer of the saints was received among wild beasts, in prisons, in flames, and from the depth of the sea and the belly of a monster. So we are admonished to enter not a hidden part of the house but the room of our heart, and, with the secret place of our mind shut, to pray to God not with many words but with conscience, because the deed surpasses all the words that are spoken. From the need to comment on the mystery of prayer Cyprian, a man of holy memory, has freed us. Tertullian too wrote a most fitting volume on it; but the man’s subsequent error took away authority from his commendable writings. “When you fast, do not become sad like the hypocrites; for they disfigure their faces so as to appear to men to be fasting,” and so on. He teaches that the profit of fasting must lie outside the boasting of a worn-out body, and that the favor of the nations must not be pursued by showing off the injury; rather, all fasting must be set in the beauty of holy works. For it is the heavenly and prophetic word that oil is the fruit of mercy. So our head, that is, the mind of our life, is to be adorned with works of goodness, because all understanding is in the head; and the filth on the face is to be washed away, so that there may be nothing of horror from vices but rather the grace of brightness when one meets us: and so, washed into the splendor of a good conscience and anointed with the grace of merciful work, we may commend our fasts to God. Otherwise, if in our fasts we flee the knowledge of men by anointing our heads, we shall be both more ridiculous and more noticed. “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth,” and the rest. So, setting aside concern for human glory and wealth, he shows that all care must be taken to please God: because either the faults of bodies or the disparagement of the envious spoils human praise; and this treasure of money is dangerous either through loss or through theft. But heavenly praise is eternal, neither to be taken away by thieves creeping in nor eaten away by the moth or rust of envy; and our heart will follow the seat of the treasure, whichever it is, and with the light of our understanding will be either with ruinous money or with the everlasting God. “The lamp of your body is your eye.” The sense continues. From the office of the eye’s light he expressed the light of the heart. If it remains simple and bright, it will give the brightness of eternal light to the body and pour the splendor of its own origin into the corruption of the flesh. But if it is darkened by sins and wicked in will, the nature of the body will be subject to the vices of the mind. “And if the light that is in you is darkness, how great must be the darkness itself?” Because the vicious origin of earthly flesh is apt dangerously to dominate the nobility of the soul, and the sins of bodies grow far heavier if they are also helped by the desires of souls; and from this our bodies become dark contrary to their nature, if the light of minds is extinguished in them; whereas if we keep it through simplicity of spirit, it must illuminate the body too with its light. “No one can serve two masters,” and so on. Service to two masters is faithless, and care for the world and for God cannot be equal. For there must be hatred toward one and love toward the other: because the same work cannot suit the different wills of masters, nor can the poor in spirit who please God be fit for the ambitious boasting of this world. “Therefore I tell you, do not think in your heart what you will eat, nor about your body what you will wear. Is not your soul worth more than food, and your body worth more than clothing?” In all the preceding discourse he had taught contempt of the world and confidence in the future. For when he commands us to be ready for injury, willing for loss, careless of vengeance, indiscriminate in loving, and unconcerned about human glory, he labors to strengthen us in the hope of eternal goods. For both the love of present things and despair of the future make many uncertain, and either capture them with allurements or confound them with unbelief. So he wishes the kingdom of heaven, which the prophets announced, John preached, and our Lord professed to be in himself, to be hoped for without any doubt of an uncertain will: otherwise there is no justification by faith, if faith itself becomes doubtful. So he commands that there be no care for clothing and food, saying that the soul is more precious than foods and the body than clothing. And indeed it is a fine thing to spend care only on divine things in contempt of present things; but the speech goes deeper, and the reason underlying the words extends into the understanding of the heavenly saying. The Lord commanded treasure to be stored in heaven, promised splendor to the body from the light of the eye, and testified that no one can please two masters; and after this he says: “Therefore I tell you, do not think in your heart what you will eat, nor about your body what you will put on.” What follows does not fit the premises well enough. Can a servant of one master not also be anxious about clothing and food? Will the body be darkened if the light of the eye is dulled by ill health? Or what light of the body can there be from the eye? Can nakedness or hunger alone store up treasure in heaven? But since the mind of unbelievers is corrupt concerning care for the future, as they cavil about what form bodies will have in the resurrection and what nourishment there will be for the substance of eternity; and since, from the difficulties of useless questions, a kind of reason has been sought for enjoying present pleasures, and, lingering in useless fear about reverence for God, they pass over into the joys of the world; and so it comes about that the service of one man to two masters is faithless: therefore, out of the highest affection of godliness, having first foretold the gravest danger of distrust, he admonishes thus: “Is not the soul worth more than food, and the body worth more than clothing?” In the words of God there is truth, and the whole efficacy of things to be created lies in the word. So neither is what he promised doubtful nor what he spoke ineffective. There is nothing that is not bodily in its substance and creation; and the elements of all things, whether in heaven or on earth, whether visible or invisible, have been formed. For even the kinds of souls, whether they occupy bodies or are exiled from bodies, still receive a bodily substance of their nature; because everything that is created must be in something. And so God, refuting the folly of a most useless question, does not allow our hope of the future in the resurrection to linger in anxiety about food and clothing, when soul and body are to be placed in the substance of eternity: lest insult be offered to him who restores things so precious, namely body and soul, by supposing he would not provide lesser things. “Look at the birds of the sky: they do not sow or gather into barns, and your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not worth much more?” Under the name of birds he exhorts us by the example of unclean spirits, to whom, without any business of seeking and gathering, the substance of living is nevertheless granted by the power of the eternal counsel. And to show that this must be referred to unclean spirits, he added: “Are you not worth much more than they?”, showing by the superiority of the comparison the difference between wickedness and holiness. “But which of you can add one cubit to his stature? And why are you anxious about clothing?” He strengthened faith in the substance of our life by the proof of the spirits; but he left the opinion about our future appearance to the judgment of common understanding. For since he will raise the diversity of all bodies that have drawn life into one perfect man, and he alone is able to add to each one’s height one cubit, or a second or third, why do we doubt about clothing, that is, about the form of bodies, with such insult to him, who, to make every man equal and uniform, will add only so much measure to human bodies? “Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they do not labor or spin. But I tell you that not even Solomon in all his glory was covered like one of these,” and so on. The lilies do not labor or spin; and Solomon, a great prophet and dear to God by the merit of the wisdom he loved, was not covered with their glory. But lilies are born rather than covered. Covering is the veil of a body, not the body itself. If it is referred to the sense of human understanding, the whiteness of a garment could have rivaled the color of the lily. But by the lilies that neither labor nor spin are to be understood the brightnesses of the heavenly angels, to whom the whiteness of glory was granted by God apart from the learning of human knowledge and the wage of their own work, lest they should be thought to have anything from their own labor or skill. And since in the resurrection men will be like angels, he wished us to hope for the covering of heavenly glory by the example of angelic brightness. It is in the nature of this plant that it is most fittingly compared to the heavenly substances of the angels. For when it is in flower, if it is torn from the stalk of the root held in the ground, it hides the power of its nature, though it may be thought to have withered, and when the season returns it is clothed again with the honor of its lily. For it flowers and is restored from itself; and what it is, it can owe neither to the root nor to the earth, since the sap that rises in it is from itself. And so, though it is annual, by the example of this greenness it imitates the power of their heavenly substance: since it is nourished into flower only by what it has received within itself. So the lilies do not labor or spin, because the powers of the angels receive their everlasting being from the honor of their origin which they obtained. “If God so clothes the grass of the field, which is today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, how much more you, of little faith?” He confirms the inviolable confidence of our faith by the authority of examples: so that the more carefully he has removed every occasion of unbelief, the greater the danger of doubting. Grass is not born in order to be given to the fire, nor does God take special care to clothe it in order that it be burned; but we often find that the nations are called by God by the name of grass. It is a plant that, when the flower of its strength has fallen, dries up in the heat of the sun. So no rest will be given to the nations, nor quiet, as they wish, by the shortcut of death; but a bodily eternity will be appointed for them too, so that there may be in them eternal material for eternal fire, and everlasting vengeance may be exercised on all who are everlasting. If, then, bodily eternity is granted to the nations only so that they may soon be appointed to the fire of judgment, how profane it is for the saints to doubt about the glory of eternity, when the work of eternity is provided to the wicked for punishment. So he requires all our expectation to be placed in faith in the promises and in the might of his power: so that, laying aside care for the things we need, we may rather expect all things from him from whom we ourselves took the beginning of life, and seek the kingdom of God with the service of our life. And this is the reward of those who live rightly and perfectly, that they are carried over from this material of a corruptible body into a new and heavenly substance, and earthly corruption is changed into heavenly incorruption. It belongs to the nations, then, to be tormented by the anxiety of this unbelief: who, held by love of the world and occupied with the joys of the body, seek and desire no way into the heavenly kingdom through faith and confession of God. “So do not be anxious about tomorrow. For tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own evil.” It is the common judgment that a day is the course of passing times lit by the light of the sun, which the intervening night divides and by its coming puts a day in place of a day; and the meaning of future time is contained in “tomorrow.” So God forbade us to be anxious about the future. And the carelessness of relaxed anxiety belongs not to negligence but to faith. For why should we be anxious about tomorrow, when the next day is anxious for itself? So the day itself, being anxious for us, drives away our anxiety. But anxiety, I think, is a feeling proper to man; for it is stirred up by the distress of care, fear, or pain. A day is the course of time; and only things that have attained foresight receive the feeling of anxiety. It would have to be established, then, that the day is a living being, which takes care, foresees, and is concerned, for which its own evil is also enough and is not to be heaped up by sin falling on it from outside. But the nature of the thing does not allow a feeling of mind to be assigned to a day: so both that it is anxious for itself, that its evil is enough for it, and that we are forbidden to be anxious about tomorrow, are all contained under sayings of heavenly meaning. We are commanded, then, not to doubt about future things; for the evil of our life and the sins of the days in which we live are enough that the whole meditation and labor of our life should be spent on cleansing them and on earning merit, lest from distrust about the future an inexpiable irreligion should also be contracted: since, when our care ceases, the future things themselves are anxious in their own office, by which they will be, and the advance of eternal glory is prepared for us, no longer anxious, by the providing goodness of God. “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged. For with the judgment you judge, you will be judged.” God removes every office of judgment entirely and allows none at all to be taken up. But what follows is thought to conflict with what was set forth, when he says: “With the judgment you judge, you will be judged.” But above he says: “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged.” Will it not be right to take up the decision of a good judgment? Yet he professes that we are to be judged according to the condition of our judgment, and that all will be measured by the kind of measure they used. So there will never be good judgment if there is to be no judging at all. But, as is recognized above, for a long time nothing light or empty is treated in the words of God; and all speech here goes beyond the sense of the ears of the nations. For he forbade judgment about his promises: because, as judgments among men are taken up from uncertain matters, so this judgment against God is taken up from ambiguity of feeling and opining. This he drives entirely away from us, so that steadfast faith may rather be kept; because, unlike other matters, the sin is not that one has judged wrongly; but in these matters merely to judge about God is the beginning of crime. “Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye and not see the beam in your own eye?” and the rest. In what follows he taught that only blasphemy against the Spirit will be beyond pardon, God granting forgiveness for all other things. The sin against the Spirit is to deny God the might of power and to take away from Christ the substance of eternity, through whom, because God came into man, man in turn will come into God. So he shows that, as great as the difference between a speck and a beam, so far does the sin against the Spirit exceed the condition of other crimes: so that, while unbelievers reproach others with faults of the body, they do not first see in themselves the burden of the sin by which they doubt the promises of God, the beam of unbelief sitting in their eye as in the eye of the mind. For it often happens that we take to ourselves the authority of correcting others without any example of our own amendment, and put forward the boast of healing another’s blindness while we ourselves are set in the darkness of corrupted light: since it is hard for anyone to supply what he lacks, and it is best to teach by example rather than by words. Care must be taken for one’s own blindness: because it is in the nature of things that no one can become a fit teacher for removing the speck from his brother’s eye until he has cast out from the light of his own mind the heavy beam of faithlessness.

Matt 6:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Dan 6:22 (allusion, low confidence) · Jonah 2:1–2 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 6:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 6:16–18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:19–21 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:22–23 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 17:21 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 5:1 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 6:26–30 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 22:30 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 40:6–7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 6:32–34 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:1–5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:31–32 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Hilary treats secret prayer, fasting, treasure in heaven, the eye as lamp, the two masters, freedom from anxiety (applied to the resurrection body), the lilies as angels, the grass as the nations destined for fire, and judging and the beam in the eye.

  • Migne’s marginal headings, column numbers, and Scripture references are removed by logged corrections.
  • Hilary refers to Cyprian’s On the Lord’s Prayer and Tertullian’s On Prayer; the “subsequent error” is Tertullian’s Montanism.
  • Hilary holds that all created things, even souls, have a bodily substance, and that the birds signify unclean spirits; translated as written. The prophetic saying that “oil is the fruit of mercy” is unidentified.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne column number and Scripture reference in the digital text; Migne column number in the digital text; Migne's Scripture reference left in the text; Migne's marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); stray mark and OCR slip in the digital text; stray mark and split word in the digital text): (Jonœ II, 2) → ; nos 690 in → nos in; Ubi cor hie, ibi post hanc vitam erit.- → ; superiore 691 sermone → superiore sermone; De resurrections quœdam dubia solvuntur. - → ; inefficax 692 quod → inefficax quod; Sub no* mille → Sub nomine; con* silii → consilii; Corpora in statura tiri perfecti suscitandi. — → ; quid 693 solliciti estis (lb. 27, 28)? → quid solliciti estis?; gloriæ 694 candor → gloriæ candor; Frenum, geniet. Resurgent ad ignem œlernum. Justorum resurreclio longe minus ambigenda.— → ; Dies quid. Sollicitudo in diem non cadit. Circa quæ tota versari debeat hominis cura. — → ; Crastinus 695 enim → Crastinus enim; sit 696 perperam → sit perperam; Frustra alios corrigit non correctus. — → .

Extrabiblical texts: Cyprian, Dom. or. (On the Lord's Prayer; allusion); Tertullian, Or. (On Prayer; allusion)

Topics: Prayer, Fasting, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Comm. Matt. 5 (PL 9:941–951; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-commentarius-matthaeum/5/#p-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-commentarius-matthaeum-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the PL 9 text; checked afterwards, privately, against the modern English translation (FOTC 125), which is not quoted or reproduced. No public-domain English exists.

Chapter 6

6PL 9:951–953

Præceptis et promissis Dei nihil preliosius sanctiusque est, quæ sanctificatis nobis immortalitatis thesaurum largiuntur. Horum igitur sacramenta atque virtutes neque in gentes eflerre, neque cum hajreticis conferre permittimur. Canes enim, de oblatrandi adversus Deum rabie, gentes sunt nuncupatæ. Porcorum vero hæreticis est nomen: quia quamvis ungulæ bifidæ sint, acceptam tamen Dei cognitionem non ruminandodisponunt. Ergo et concorporationem Verbi Dei, el passionis mysterium, et virtutem resurreciionis non promiscue tractare nos convenit, neque imperite incurioseque proferre: ne ignorantiam nostram, si perfectæ scientiæ desit instructio, prolerant atque conculcent, et infirmitatem in Deo passionis irrideant; conversique in nos, contradictionum aculeis imperiiiam nostram fidemque disrumpant. Sed in his, quae ignorabimus, via nobis consequendæ veritatis aperitur: quam obtinere in sola precum mora est. Ut igitur sentiamus credamusque omnia, et nullo ambiguæ voluntatis differamur incerto; orandum est, quærendum est, pulsaudum est: oratione misericordiam, inquisitione profectum, tenlamenio aditum reperturi. Quin etiam ad spem obtinendi, exemplo humani affectus docemur. Nam cum nos filiis pisccm panemve poscentibus, non serpentem simus aut lapidem reddituri; quanto magis nobis optimus ac præstantissimus pater Deus orantibus perfectæ fidei inunera largietur; neque sit pro vitæ cilio lapidem duritiæ gentilis, aut pro baptismi conservatione serpentem veneni haeretici præstiturus? Consummavit deinde omnia bonitatis exemplo, universos amoris mutui pace conjungens: in co legis et prophetarnm mandata constituens, ut universorum in nns bonitatem optantes, ipsi omnibus boni simus. Intrate per angustam portam. Quam lata el spatiosa via, quæ ducit ad perditionem! Arduum in cœlum iter hominis est, et aditus angustus ac tenuis: cæterum pcrdilionis via lata est. Hanc plures obtinent, illam porro pauci inveniunt. Paucis enim damna rerum præsenlium carasunt; quibus cupiditates et animi vincere et corporis frangere, et exposita totis sæculi viribus illecebrarum omnium lenocinia præterire, maximum caelestis spei lucrum est. lllis autem quibus solum bonum est scortari, comessari, ambire, iusolescere, fastidire, odisse, diripere, plurimus est frequentatum iter tale comitatus. Et quia paucorum esset viam angustam invenire, frauduleniiam eorum qui earn se quaerere mentirentur exponil, dicens: Attendite a pseudoprophetis, qui veniunt ad vos in vestimentis ovium, elc.. Blandimenla verborum et mansuetudinis simulaiionem admonet fructu operationis expeudi oportere: ut non qualem quis se verbis referat, sed qualem se rebus efficiat spectemus; quia in multis vestitut ovium rabies lupiua contegitur. Ergo, ut spinæ uvas, ut tributi ficus non generant, et ut iniquæ arbores Utilia poma non afferunt: ita ne in istis quidem consistere docet boni operis effectum; et idcirco omnes cognoscendos esse de fructibus. Regnum enim coelorum sola verborum officia non obtinent: neque qui dixerit: Domine, Domine, haeres illius erit. Quid enim meriti est Domino dicere Domine, Domine? Numquid Dominus non erit, nisi fuerit dictus a nobis? El quæ officii sanctitas est nominis nuncupatio; cum coelestis regni iter obedieniia potius voluntatis, non Dei nuncupatio repertura sit? Multi mihi dicent in illa die, Domine Domine, nonne in tuo nomine prophetarimus? et reliqua. Eliam nunc pseudopropheiarum fraudulenliam el hypocritarum simulamenia condemnat, qui gloriam sibi ex verbi virtute præsumunt, in doctrinæ prophetia, et dæmoniorum fuga, et istiusmodi operuM virtutibus: atque hinc sibi regnum coelorum pollicentur. Quasi vero eorum aliquid proprium sit, quæ loquunlur aut faciunt, et non omnia virtus Dei invocata perficiat: cum doctrinæ scientiam lectio-afferat, dæmoniorum, fugam Cbristi nomen exagitet. De nostro igitur est beata illa xternitas promerenda: præstandumque cst aliquid ex proprio, ut bonum velimus, malum omne vitemus, totoque aJfccLu praeceptis coelestibus obtemperemus: ae talihus officiis cogniti Deo simus, agamusque potius qUod vult, quam quod potest gloriemur: repudians cos ac repellens, quos a cognitione sua opera iniquitatis averterint. Omnis ergo qui audit verba mea, et facit, similem cum æstimabo viro sapienti, qui ædificavit domum siiam super petram, et reliqua. Sensus est superioribus junctus. Objurgans enim pseudoprophetarum jactantiam el hypocritarum figmenta, per comparationis exempluin perfectæ in se fidei hominem exponit, quod is, qui verba sua et audiat et faciat, super petratq sit ædificatus, et fundamento stabili (irmoque consistat, eumque incidentium tempestatum impetu non posse dissolvi; in peira se ipsum Dominus significans, validum xdificii fundamentum. Cum autem qui ex se in sublime opus excreverit, moveri non possit vel pluviis, vel fluminibus, vel vento; in pluviis, blandarum et sensim illabentium voluptatum illecebras significat, quibus primum fides rimis patentibus immadescil: post quas torrehtium procursus, id est, graviorum cupiditatum motus incurrit: atque exinde tota ventorum vis circumflaniium desrevit, universus scilicet diabolicæ potestatis spiriius infertur. Sed fundamento petræ homo ædificatus insistet, nee moveri loco suo i poterit. Stultus vero hæc audita dissimulans, tamquam super arenam opus ædificationis impenderit, infideliier stat, cito pluviis illabentibus subluendus, et fluminibus propelleudus, et ventis differeudus, secundum naturam super quas xdificatus est arenarum, cum gravi ruinæ suæ strage solvendus. Atque ita superiorum comparationum exemplo Dominus nos voluit, et,efficere quae jussit, et credere quae spopondit. Consummalis igitur omnibus, turbæ mirabantur doctrinamejus, qua se non Scribarum et Pharisæorum more docuisset. In verborum enim virtutibus effectus potestatum metiebantur.

Nothing is more precious and holier than the precepts and promises of God, which bestow on us, once sanctified, the treasure of immortality. We are not permitted, then, either to carry out their mysteries and powers to the nations or to share them with heretics. For the nations are called dogs because of their rage in barking against God. The name of pigs belongs to the heretics: because, although their hoofs are cloven, they do not dispose of the knowledge of God they have received by chewing it over. So it is fitting that we do not treat indiscriminately the embodiment of the Word of God, the mystery of the passion, and the power of the resurrection, nor bring them out unskillfully and carelessly: lest, if instruction in perfect knowledge is lacking, they trample and tread down our ignorance, mock the weakness of the passion in God, and, turning on us, break apart our unskillfulness and faith with the stings of their contradictions. But in the things we do not know, a way of attaining the truth is opened to us, which can be obtained only by persevering in prayer. So, that we may perceive and believe all things and not be delayed by any uncertainty of a doubtful will, we must ask, seek, and knock: by prayer we shall find mercy, by seeking progress, by trying entrance. Indeed, we are taught to hope for obtaining by the example of human affection. For since we would not give a serpent or a stone to our sons asking for fish or bread, how much more will God, the best and most excellent Father, bestow the gifts of perfect faith on us when we pray; nor will he give, instead of the food of life, the stone of pagan hardness, or, instead of the keeping of baptism, the serpent of heretical poison. Then he completed all things with the example of goodness, joining all in the peace of mutual love: setting in this the commandments of the law and the prophets, that, wishing the goodness of all toward us, we ourselves may be good to all. “Enter through the narrow gate. How wide and spacious is the way that leads to destruction!” Man’s road to heaven is steep, and the entrance narrow and thin; but the way of destruction is wide. Many keep to the latter; few find the former. For losses of present things are dear to few, for whom it is the greatest gain of heavenly hope to conquer the desires of the soul, to break those of the body, and to pass by the enticements of all allurements set out with the whole strength of the world. But for those whose only good is to fornicate, carouse, scheme for office, grow insolent, scorn, hate, and plunder, such a well-trodden road has a very large company. And since it belonged to few to find the narrow way, he exposes the deceit of those who would falsely claim to seek it, saying: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing,” and so on. He warns that flattering words and pretended gentleness must be weighed by the fruit of action: so that we look not at what kind of person someone presents himself to be in words, but at what he makes himself in deeds; because in many a wolf’s rage is covered by sheep’s clothing. So, just as thorns do not produce grapes or thistles figs, and as bad trees do not bear useful fruit, so he teaches that the effect of good work does not lie in these people either; and therefore all are to be known by their fruits. For the mere services of words do not obtain the kingdom of heaven; nor will he who has said, “Lord, Lord,” be its heir. For what merit is there in saying to the Lord, “Lord, Lord”? Will he not be Lord unless he has been called so by us? And what holiness of duty is there in naming a name, since the road to the heavenly kingdom will be found by obedience of the will rather than by naming God? “Many will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name?” and the rest. Here again he condemns the deceit of false prophets and the pretenses of hypocrites, who presume glory for themselves from the power of the word, in the prophecy of teaching, the putting to flight of demons, and powers of works of this kind, and from this promise themselves the kingdom of heaven. As if anything they say or do were their own, and the power of God, when invoked, did not accomplish all: since reading brings the knowledge of teaching, and the name of Christ drives the demons to flight. That blessed eternity, then, must be earned from what is ours; and something must be supplied from our own, that we may will the good, avoid all evil, and obey the heavenly precepts with all our affection, and be known to God by such services, and do rather what he wills than glory in what we can do: he rejects and repels those whom works of iniquity have turned away from knowing him. “Everyone, then, who hears my words and does them, I will liken to a wise man who built his house upon the rock,” and the rest. The sense is joined to what precedes. For rebuking the boasting of false prophets and the fictions of hypocrites, he sets out by the example of a comparison the man of perfect faith in himself: that he who both hears and does his words is built on the rock and stands on a stable and firm foundation, and cannot be broken up by the onset of storms that fall upon him; the Lord signifying himself by the rock, the strong foundation of the building. He who has grown up from it into a lofty work cannot be moved by rains, rivers, or wind. By the rains he signifies the allurements of soft pleasures slipping in gradually, by which faith first grows damp through opening cracks; after these comes the onrush of torrents, that is, the movements of heavier desires; and then the whole force of the winds blowing around rages, that is, the whole spirit of the devil’s power is brought to bear. But the man built on the foundation of the rock will stand and cannot be moved from his place. The fool, ignoring what he has heard, as if he had spent the work of building on sand, stands faithlessly, soon to be washed away by the rains slipping in, driven by the rivers, scattered by the winds, according to the nature of the sands on which he was built, to be broken up with the heavy disaster of his ruin. And so by the example of the preceding comparisons the Lord willed us both to do what he commanded and to believe what he promised. When all had been completed, the crowds marveled at his teaching, since he had not taught in the manner of the scribes and Pharisees. For they measured the effect of his powers by the power of his words.

Matt 7:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 11:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:7–11 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 7:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 7:13–14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:15–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:22–23 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:24–27 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:28–29 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Holy things are not to be given to dogs (pagans) or pigs (heretics); Hilary treats asking and receiving, the golden rule, the narrow gate, false prophets known by fruits, and the houses on rock and sand.

  • The chapter opens without the Gospel lemma (Matt 7:6, “Do not give what is holy to dogs …”), which survives in the digital text only as the remnant “VII, 6)” of Migne’s reference; that remnant and Migne’s marginal headings, column numbers, and references are removed by logged corrections.
  • Hilary’s identification of the dogs with pagans and the pigs with heretics, and his statement that eternity “must be earned from what is ours,” are translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne column number and Scripture reference in the digital text; Migne column number in the digital text; Migne's Scripture reference left in the text; Migne's marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); remnant of Migne's Scripture reference in the digital text; stray mark in the digital text): VII, 6). → ; perfectæ 697 scientiæ → perfectæ scientiæ; (lbid., 9 et seq.) → ; Via cœli a paucis (rita, et e contra. — → ; Dei servus non verbis, sed factis dignoscitur.— → ; Domine, 698 Domine, haeres illius erit (lb., 21). → Domine, Domine, haeres illius erit.; Cœlum non mirabilibussed bonis operibus redditur. — → ; (lb. 2i) → ; Tentationum progressus.— → ; exponit, ] quod → exponit, quod; ædificatus 699 insistet → ædificatus insistet.

Topics: Heresy, Ethics, Prayer

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Comm. Matt. 6 (PL 9:951–953; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-commentarius-matthaeum/5/#p-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-commentarius-matthaeum-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the PL 9 text; checked afterwards, privately, against the modern English translation (FOTC 125), which is not quoted or reproduced. No public-domain English exists.