On the Trinity 8.50–9.11

Latin text: Migne, PL 10 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 9 (1899).

Show

Chapter 8

8.50PL 10:273a–274a

Primogenitus itaque omnis creaturae est, quia in ipso creata omnia sunt. Et ne quod in ipso creata omnia sunt, non ad ipsum quisquam auderet referre, ait, Omnia per ipsum et in ipso condita sunt, et ipse est ante omnes, et omnia ipsi constant. Omnia itaque ipsi constant, qui ante omnia est, et in quo omnia sunt. Et haec quidem ad exordia pertinent creaturarum. Caeterum ob dispensationem corporis nostri ait: Et ipse est caput corporis Ecclesiae, qui est initium, primogenitus ex mortuis, ut fieret in omnibus ipse primatum tenens; quia in ipso complacuit omnem plenitudinem habitare, et per ipsum omnia reconciliari in eum. Reddidit Apostolus spiritalibus sacramentis corporeas operationes. Namque qui imago Dei invisibilis est, et ipse est caput corporis Ecclesiae: et qui primogenitus omnis creaturae est, idem initium, primogenitus ex mortuis est: ut in omnibus teneat primatum, dum nobis corpus est, qui Dei imago est; dum qui primogenitus creaturae est, idem primogenitus ad aeternitatem est, ut cui spiritalia debent, in primogenito creata, quod maneant; ei et humana debeant, quod in primogenito ex mortuis renascantur aeterna. Ipse est enim initium, qui cum filius sit, imago est; cum imago est, Dei est. Primogenitus quoque omnis creaturae est, continens in se universitatis exordium. Et rursum ipse caput corporis Ecclesiae est, et primogenitus ex mortuis, ut in omnibus teneat ipse primatum. Et quia omnia ei constant, in ipso complacita plenitudo consistit; dum in eo per ipsum in eum reconciliantur omnia, in quo per ipsum in ipso omnia sunt creata.

He is, then, the firstborn of all creation, because in him all things were created. And so that no one should dare not to refer to him the fact that all things were created in him, he says: "All things were founded through him and in him, and he is before all, and all things hold together in him." All things, then, hold together in him who is before all things and in whom all things are. These words concern the beginnings of creatures. But on account of the dispensation of our body he says: "And he is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things he himself might hold the first place; because in him it pleased all the fullness to dwell, and through him all things to be reconciled to him." The apostle has set bodily operations alongside the spiritual mysteries. For he who is the image of the invisible God is also the head of the body, the church; and he who is the firstborn of all creation is also the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that in all things he may hold the first place, since he who is the image of God is a body for us; since he who is the firstborn of creation is also the firstborn into eternity; so that, as spiritual things owe it to him that they endure, being created in the firstborn, human things too may owe it to him that they are reborn eternal in the firstborn from the dead. For he is the beginning, who, being Son, is image; being image, is of God. He is also the firstborn of all creation, containing in himself the beginning of the universe. And again he is the head of the body, the church, and the firstborn from the dead, so that in all things he may hold the first place. And because all things hold together in him, the fullness well pleasing stands in him, since in him, through him, all things are reconciled to him, in whom, through him, all things were created in him.

Col 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:20 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Col 1:15–20 makes the Son the firstborn both of creation and from the dead, head of creation and of the church.

  • Quotations: Col 1:16–20.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.50 (PL 10:273a–274a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-50). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-50) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.51PL 10:274a–275a

Sentisne jam quid sit esse imaginem Dei? Creari utique omnia in eo per cum. Cum in eo creantur omnia, intellige etiam eum cujus imago est creantem in eo omnia. Cum autem quae in eo creantur, per ipsum creantur; in hoc quoque, qui imago est, naturam ejus cujus imago est inesse cognosce. Per se enim creat, quae in ipso creantur: sicuii per ipsum reconciliantur in eo omnia. Cum in eo reconciliantur, paternae in eo unitatis apprehende naturam reconciliantem sibi in eo omnia. Cum per eum reconciliantur omnia, ipsum Patri reconciliantem in se omnia quae per se reconciliabat intellige. Ait enim idem Apostolus: Omnia autem a Deo, qui reconciliavit nos sibi per Christum, et dedit nobis ministerium reconciliationis; quoniam quidem Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi. Confer cum bis omne evangelieae fidei sacramentum. Qui enim videtur in viso, qui operatur in operante, qui loquitur in loquente, idem in reconciliante reconciliat. Et idcirco in eo et per eum reconciliatio est, quia per indifferentem naturam Pater in eo manens, mundum sibi ipse per eum et iu eo reconciliatione reddebat.

Do you now perceive what it is to be the image of God? It is surely that all things are created in him through him. Since all things are created in him, understand also that he whose image he is creates all things in him. And since what is created in him is created through him, recognize also that in him who is the image the nature of him whose image he is is present. For he creates through himself what is created in him, just as all things are reconciled in him through him. Since they are reconciled in him, grasp the nature of the Father's unity in him, reconciling all things to himself in him. Since all things are reconciled through him, understand that he reconciles to the Father in himself all that he reconciled through himself. For the same apostle says: "But all things are from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; since God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself." Compare with these the whole mystery of the gospel faith. He who is seen in the one seen, who works in the one working, who speaks in the one speaking, the same reconciles in the one reconciling. And therefore reconciliation is in him and through him, because the Father, abiding in him through an undifferenced nature, was himself restoring the world to himself in reconciliation through him and in him.

2 Cor 5:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:20 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Creation and reconciliation in and through the Son, by God who was in Christ (2 Cor 5:18–19), show the Father's nature in him.

  • Quotation: 2 Cor 5:18–19.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.51 (PL 10:274a–275a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-51). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-51) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.52PL 10:275a–276a

Consulens itaque humanae infirmitati Deus non incerta verborum nuditate fidem docuit. Namque cum credendi necessitatem dicti dominici auetoritas sola praestaret, tamen sensum nostrum per intelligentiam editae rationis instituit: ut id quod dixerat: Ego et Pater unum sumus, per causam ipsam unitatis expositae nosceremus, Dicens enim se per loquentem loqui, et per operantem operari, et per judicantem judicare, et per visum videri, et per reconciliantem reconciliare, et manere se in eo qui in se maneret: quaero quo alio ad intelligentiae nostrae sensum expositionis suae uti potuerit aptiore sermone, ut unum esse intelligerentur, quam isto, quo per nativitatis veritatem, et naturae unitatem, quidquid Filius ageret ac diceret, id in Filio Pater et loqueretur etgereret? Non est hoc itaque naturae a se alienae neque per creationem in Deum comparatae, neque ex portione Dei In Deum natae; sed perfecta nativitate in Deum perfectum genitae divinitatis, cujus haec naturalis conscientae fiducia est, ut dicat: Ego in Pater, et Pater in me: et rursum: Omnia quae Patris sunt, mea sunt. Nihil enim ei ex Deo decst, quo operante et loquente et visu, Deus et operatur et loquitur el videtur. Non sunt duo in unius vel operatione, vel sermone, vel visu. Nec solitarius Deus est, qui in operante et loquente et viso Deo, Deus et operatus et locutus et visus sit. Hoc Ecclesia intelligit, hoc Synagoga non credit, hoc philesophia non sapit, unum ex uno, et totum a toto, Deum et filium, neque per nativitatem Patri ademisse quod totum est, neque hoc ipsum totum non secum nascendo tenuisse. Et quisquis in hac infidelitatis stultitia detinebitur, aut Judaeorum sectator, aut gentium est.

Caring for human weakness, then, God did not teach the faith by an uncertain bareness of words. For although the authority of the Lord's word alone would have imposed the necessity of believing, he still trained our sense through the understanding of a reason set forth, so that we might know what he had said, "I and the Father are one," through the very cause of the unity explained. For in saying that he speaks through the one speaking, works through the one working, judges through the one judging, is seen through the one seen, reconciles through the one reconciling, and abides in him who abides in him, I ask what other, more fitting language he could have used in his explanation to the sense of our understanding, so that they might be understood to be one, than this, by which, through the truth of birth and the unity of nature, whatever the Son did and said, the Father spoke and did in the Son? This, then, does not belong to a nature foreign to itself, nor to one acquired as God through creation, nor to one born as God from a portion of God, but to a divinity begotten by a perfect birth as perfect God, whose natural confidence of consciousness it is to say: "I in the Father, and the Father in me," and again: "All that is the Father's is mine." For nothing of God is lacking to him, by whose working, speaking, and being seen God works, speaks, and is seen. There are not two in the working, speaking, or being seen of one. Nor is God solitary, who in God working, speaking, and seen has worked, spoken, and been seen as God. This the church understands, this the synagogue does not believe, this philosophy does not grasp: that one from one, whole from whole, God and Son, neither by birth took from the Father what is whole, nor in being born failed to hold this whole along with him. And whoever is held in this folly of unbelief is a follower either of the Jews or of the Gentiles.

John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ's sayings that the Father speaks and works in him explain how they are one: whole from whole, by a perfect birth.

  • Quotations: John 10:30; John 14:10; John 16:15. Migne's gloss "(supple, naturis distincti)" is removed. The statement about the synagogue and "the Jews" is Hilary's polemic, translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's editorial note removed (not Hilary's text)): (supple, naturis distincti) → .

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.52 (PL 10:275a–276a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-52). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-52) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.53PL 10:276a–276c

Ut autem dictum Domini intelligas quo ait: Omnia quae. Patris sunt, mea sunt; Apostoli et doctrinam et fidem disce dicentis: Videte ne quis vos seducat per philosophiam et inanem deceptionem secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi, et non secundum Christum: quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis corporativer. De mundo est, et doctrinas hominum sapit, et philosophiae praeda est, quisquis Christum verum Deum nescit, quisquis in eo plenitudinem divinitatis ignorat. Humana mens hoc solum sapit quod intelligit, et mundus hoc tantum quod potest credit, secundum elementorum naturas id tantum possibile existimans, quod aut videret, aut ageret. Elementa enim mundi ex nihilo substiterunt: sed Christus non de non substantibus manet, nec coepit ad originem, sed originem ab origine sumpsit aeternam. Elementa enim mundi aut inanima sunt, aut ad animam profecerunt: sed Christus vita est, ex Deo vivente in viventem Deum natus. Elementa mundi a Deo sunt instituta, non Deus Sunt: Christus ex Deo Deus hoc totum est ipse quod Deus est. Elementa mundi cum intra sint, non possunt a se exstare ne intra sint: Deum sub sacramento in se habens Christus in Deo est. Elementa mundi cum ex se sui generis generant ad vitam, per corporales quidem passiones praebent ex se initia nascendi; caeterum non insunt viva ipsa nascentibus: omnis vero corporaliter plenitudo divinitatis In Christo est.

But so that you may understand the Lord's saying, "All that is the Father's is mine," learn the teaching and faith of the apostle, who says: "See that no one leads you astray through philosophy and empty deceit according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ; because in him dwells all the fullness of divinity bodily." He is of the world, savours the teachings of men, and is the prey of philosophy, whoever does not know Christ as true God, whoever is ignorant of the fullness of divinity in him. The human mind savours only what it understands, and the world believes only what it can, reckoning possible, according to the natures of the elements, only what it sees or does. For the elements of the world came to be from nothing; but Christ does not endure from things that did not exist, nor did he begin at an origin; he took an eternal origin from an origin. The elements of the world are either lifeless or have advanced to life; but Christ is life, born from the living God into living God. The elements of the world were established by God and are not God; Christ, God from God, is himself wholly this which God is. The elements of the world, since they are within, cannot stand out from themselves so as not to be within; Christ, having God in himself under a mystery, is in God. The elements of the world, when they beget from themselves offspring of their kind into life, provide from themselves the beginnings of birth through bodily passions, but they are not themselves alive in those born; but all the fullness of divinity is in Christ bodily.

John 16:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Col 2:8–9 contrasts the elements of the world with Christ, in whom the whole fullness of divinity dwells bodily.

  • Quotations: John 16:15; Col 2:8–9. Migne's reference "(Coloss. ii, 8, 9)" is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's Scripture reference removed (not Hilary's)): (Coloss. ii, 8, 9) → .

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.53 (PL 10:276a–276c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-53). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-53) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.54PL 10:276c–277b

Et interrogo, cujus in eo divinitatis plenitudo est? Quae si non Patris est, quem mihi Deum alium unius Dei fallax praedicator imponis, cujus divinitatis plenitudo habitet in Christo? Si vero Patris est, edoce quomodo corporaliter haec in eo habitet plenitudo. Si enim corporali modo Patrem in Filio credis; Pater in Filio habitans non exstabit in sese. Si vero, quod est potius, corporaliter in eo manens divinitas naturae in eo Dei ex Deo significat veritatem; dum in eo Deus est, non aut per dignationem aut per voluntatem, sed per generationem verus et totus corporali secundum se plenitudine manens; dum quod ipse est, id etiam per nativitatem Dei in Deum natum est; neque diversum aut differens aliquid in Deo est, quam id quod corporaliter habitet in Christo; et quidquid inhabitet corporaliter, id ipsum secundum divinitatis est plenitudinem: quid humana sectaris? quid inanium deceptionum doctrinis inhaeres? quid mihi affers unanimitatem, concordiam, creaturam? Plenitudo divinitatis in Christo est corporaliter.

And I ask: whose fullness of divinity is in him? If it is not the Father's, what other God, you deceitful preacher of one God, do you impose on me, whose fullness of divinity dwells in Christ? But if it is the Father's, explain how this fullness dwells in him bodily. For if you believe the Father is in the Son in a bodily manner, the Father dwelling in the Son will not exist in himself. But if, as is rather the case, the divinity abiding in him bodily signifies the truth of the nature in him of God from God, since God is in him not by condescension or by will but by generation, true and whole, abiding in bodily fullness according to himself; since what he himself is has also been born, through the birth of God, into God; and since there is nothing different or diverse in God from what dwells bodily in Christ, and whatever dwells bodily is that very thing according to the fullness of divinity: why do you follow human things? Why do you cling to the teachings of empty deceits? Why do you offer me unanimity, concord, a creature? The fullness of divinity is in Christ bodily.

Col 2:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The fullness that dwells bodily in Christ is the Father's divinity, present by generation, not by will or condescension.

  • Allusions: Col 2:8–9.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.54 (PL 10:276c–277b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-54). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-54) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.55PL 10:277b–278a

Tenuit autem etiam in hoc Apostolus fidei suae legem, ut corporaliter in Christo inhabitare plenitudinem divinitatis doceret: ne ad unionem impiam fidei sermo decideret, nec ad alterius naturae intelligentiam furor irreligiosus erumperet. Habitans enim in Christo plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter, nec singularis nec separabilis est: dum nec se patitur a corporali plenitudine corporalis plenitudo discerni, nec habitans divinitas ea ipsa intelligi potest esse divinitatis habitatio. Atque ita Christus est, ut corporaliter plenitudo divinitatis in Christo sit; sic vero in Christo sit divinitatis corporaliter plenitudo, ut in eo inhabitans plenitudo non aliud intelligatur esse quam Christus. Furare quas voles verborum occasiones, et irreligiosi ingenii aculeos excita. Ementire saltem cujus plenitudo divinitatis in Christo inhabitet corporaliter. Est enim Christus, est et inhabitans in eo divinitatis corporaliter plenitudo.

The apostle kept the law of his faith in this also, teaching that the fullness of divinity dwells in Christ bodily, so that the language of faith should not fall into an impious union, nor irreligious madness break out into the notion of another nature. For the fullness of divinity dwelling in Christ bodily is neither single nor separable, since the bodily fullness does not allow itself to be distinguished from the bodily fullness, nor can the indwelling divinity be understood to be the very dwelling-place of divinity. And so Christ is such that the fullness of divinity is in Christ bodily; and the fullness of divinity is in Christ bodily in such a way that the fullness dwelling in him is understood to be nothing other than Christ. Steal whatever openings in the words you like, and rouse the stings of your irreligious wit. At least make up a lie about whose fullness of divinity dwells in Christ bodily. For there is Christ, and there is also the fullness of divinity dwelling in him bodily.

Col 2:9 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: "Bodily" fullness excludes both a single undistinguished God and a divinity of another nature in Christ.

  • Allusion: Col 2:9.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.55 (PL 10:277b–278a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-55). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-55) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

8.56PL 10:278a–278b

Et si quaeras quae sit habitatio corporalis; intellige quid sit loqui in loquente, et in viso videri, et in operante operari, et in Deo Deum, et ex toto totum, et ex uno unum: et ita corporalis divinitatis plenitudinem recognosce. Et cujus haec divinitatis corporaliter inhabitans plenitudo sit, memento Apostolum non tacere dicentem: Ea enim, quae invisibilia sunt ejus, a constitutione mundi, per ea quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur aeterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas. Hujus itaque divinitas corporalis in Christo est, non ex parte, sed tota; neque portio est, sed plenitudo: ita corporaliter manens, ut unum sint; ita unum sunt, ut a Deo non differat Deus; ita indifferens a Deo Deus, ut perfectura Deum substituerit perfecta nativitas; ita autem perfecta nativitas subsistat, quia in Deo ex Deo nato corporaliter divinitatis inhabitet plenitudo.

And if you ask what a bodily dwelling is, understand what it is to speak in the one speaking, to be seen in the one seen, to work in the one working, God in God, whole from whole, one from one; and so recognize the bodily fullness of divinity. And whose fullness of divinity this is, dwelling bodily, remember that the apostle does not keep silent, when he says: "For his invisible things, from the founding of the world, are understood and clearly seen through the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity." His divinity, then, is bodily in Christ, not in part but whole; it is not a portion but the fullness; abiding bodily in such a way that they are one; one in such a way that God does not differ from God; God undifferenced from God in such a way that a perfect birth has produced perfect God; and the perfect birth so subsists that in God born from God the fullness of divinity dwells bodily.

Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The bodily fullness in Christ is the Father's whole divinity (Rom 1:20), present in the Son by a perfect birth.

  • Quotation: Rom 1:20. "Not in part" follows the sense; the digital text reads ex pane ("from bread"), a slip for ex parte.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slips: pane for parte, lota for tota): non ex pane, sed lota → non ex parte, sed tota.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 8.56 (PL 10:278a–278b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-8-56). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-8-56) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

Chapter 9

9.1PL 10:280a–281a

Tractantes superiore libro de indifferenti natura Dei patris et Dei filii, et id quod dictum est, Ego et Pater unum sumus, demonstrantes non ad solitarium Deum proficere, sed ad unitatem indiscretae secundum generationem divinitatis; dum neque aliunde quam ex Deo Deus natus est, et ex Deo Deus non potest non id esse quod Deus est: percursisque, etsi non omnibus, tamen ad intelligentiam sufficientibus dictorum divinorum atque apostolicorum testimoniis, quibus inseparabilis natura ac potestas Patris ac Filii docebatur, usque ad hunc apostolicae fidei locum venimus, quo ait: Videte ne quis vos seducat per philosophiam et inanem deceptionem secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi, et non secundum Christum: quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter. In quo, per corporaliter habitantem in eo divinitatis plenitudinem, verum et perfectum et paternae naturae Deum demonstrari docuimus: ita ut habitans plenitudo nec diversum intelligeretur significare, neque unicum: cum et incorporalis Dei corporalis habitatio proprietatem naturalis unitatis in Deo qui ex Deo substitisset doceret; et habitans in Christo Deus, subsistentis Christi nativitatem, dum ejus est habitator, ostenderet. Per quod impietati eorum satis superque arbitror fuisse responsum, qui id, quod a Domino dictum est: Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem; et Pater in me, et ego in Patre; et, Ego et Pater unum sumus; et, Omnia quae Patris sunt, mea sunt, ad unitatem et concordiam voluntatis referrent: ut quia dicti fides maneret, dicti tamen intelligentiam fallacis doctrinae religio ementita corrumperet; et cum negari non posset in his voluntatum assensus, in quibus naturae unitas praedicatur, ad abolendam tamen eam quae secundum nativitatem est unitatem, societas tantum concordiae crederetur. Sed beato Apostolo, post multa naturalis veritatis non ambigua praeconia, corporaliter habitantis divinitatis plenitudinem in Christo docente, abscissa est omnis impiae temeritatis assertio, cum naturalem unitatem incorporalis divinitatis habitatio corporalis efficeret: ut id quod non solus est Filius, sed quod in eo manet Pater; neque solum manet, sed et operatur et loquitur; neque solum operatur et loquitur, sed et videtur, non sint nuncupativa, sed vera, dum habet in se per sacramentum nativilatis et virtus virtutem, et potestas potestatem, et natura naturam; tenens per nativitatem ipsa quod suum est, et ex se per imaginem referens quod in se est, dum et imago est auctoris et veritas; quia perfecta nativitas perfectam imaginem prstat, et plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter inhabitans naturalem obtinet veritatem.

In the preceding book we treated of the undifferenced nature of God the Father and God the Son, and showed that the saying "I and the Father are one" does not lead to a solitary God but to the unity of a divinity undivided according to generation, since God was born from nowhere else than from God, and God from God cannot but be what God is. Having run through testimonies of the divine and apostolic sayings, if not all, yet enough for understanding, by which the inseparable nature and power of the Father and the Son was taught, we came to this passage of the apostolic faith, where he says: "See that no one leads you astray through philosophy and empty deceit according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ; because in him dwells all the fullness of divinity bodily." In it we taught that, through the fullness of divinity dwelling bodily in him, he is shown to be true and perfect God and of the Father's nature, so that the indwelling fullness was understood to signify neither a different one nor a single one: since the bodily dwelling of the incorporeal God taught the property of natural unity in God who had come to subsist from God, and God dwelling in Christ, being his indweller, showed the birth of Christ who subsists. By this, I think, more than enough answer has been given to the impiety of those who referred the Lord's sayings, "He who has seen me has seen the Father also," and "The Father in me and I in the Father," and "I and the Father are one," and "All that is the Father's is mine," to a unity and concord of will; so that, while belief in the saying remained, the false religion of a deceitful teaching might corrupt the understanding of the saying; and, since agreement of wills could not be denied in those in whom unity of nature is proclaimed, a fellowship of concord alone might be believed in order to abolish the unity that is according to birth. But when the blessed apostle, after many unambiguous proclamations of the natural truth, taught the fullness of divinity dwelling bodily in Christ, every assertion of impious rashness was cut off, since the bodily dwelling of the incorporeal divinity brought about a natural unity: so that the facts that the Son is not alone but the Father abides in him, and not only abides but works and speaks, and not only works and speaks but is seen, are not nominal but real; since through the mystery of birth he has in himself power from power, might from might, and nature from nature, holding by birth what is his own, and bearing forth from himself through the image what is in himself, being both the image and the truth of the author; because a perfect birth provides a perfect image, and the fullness of divinity dwelling bodily holds a natural truth.

John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Hilary recalls Book 8: the fullness of divinity dwelling bodily in Christ refutes a unity of will and proves natural unity.

  • Quotations: John 10:30; Col 2:8–9; John 14:9, 10; 16:15.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.1 (PL 10:280a–281a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.2PL 10:281a–282b

Et hc quidem quamvis ita se ut sunt habeant, quia naturalis ex Deo Deus non potest nisi in ea nativitatis su natura esse qua Deus est, et viventis natur indifferens unitas inseparabilis a se est sub viventis nativitate natur: tamen per fidei evangelic salutarem confessionem subrepunt hretici ad veritatis excidium, ut naturalem Filio detrahant unitatem, dum aliter atque ad aliud dicta, aliter atque in aliud intelligenda componunt. Negantes itaque Dei filium, utuntur ea auctoritate qua dixerit: Quid me dicis bonum? Nemo est bonus nisi unus Deus: ut quia unum Deum professio ejus locuta sit, quidquid illud exinde in Dei nomine erit, jam non in natura Dei maneat, quia Deus unus est. Atque ut id, quod ipse Deus dicitur, nuncupatione potius quam veritate sit; hinc confirmare nituntur, quia dixerit: Hc est autem vita terna, ut cognoscant te solum verum Deum. Et ut extra proprietatem veri Dei sit, id adjiciunt: Non potest Filius facere ab se quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Tentant quoque et illud: Pater major me est. Postremo jam tamquam indissolubili abnegat divinitatis professione subvertisse se fidem Ecclesi gloriantur, cum relegunt: De die autem illa et hora nemo scit, neque Angeli in clis, nec Filius, nisi Pater solus. Non enim videtur exquabilis per nativitatem esse natura, qu ignorationis sit necessitate diversa; et Pater sciendo ac Filius nesciendo manifestent dissimilitudinem divinitatis: quia et ignorare Deus nihil debeat, et ignorans non comparandus sit ad scientem. Sed hc omnia, nec ratione intelligentes, nec temporibus discernentes, nec sacramentis evangelicis apprehendentes, nec dictorum virtutibus sentientes, stulto atque imperito furore adversus divinitatis naturam loquuntur, ad implendas aures ignorantium sola hc et nuda memorantes, aut absolutionibus eorum tacitis, aut causis: cum dictorum intelligentia aut ex prpositi, aut ex consequentibus expetatur.

And although these things are as they are, because natural God from God can only be in that nature of his birth by which he is God, and the undifferenced unity of the living nature is inseparable from itself under the birth of the living nature, yet the heretics creep in through the saving confession of the gospel faith to destroy the truth, so as to take from the Son his natural unity, while they arrange sayings spoken in one way and for one purpose to be understood in another way and for another purpose. Denying the Son of God, they use the authority of his saying: "Why do you call me good? No one is good but one, God"; so that, because his profession spoke of one God, whatever else is afterwards called by the name of God no longer abides in the nature of God, because God is one. And so that his being called God himself may be by naming rather than in truth, they try to confirm it from his saying: "And this is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God." And so that he may be outside the property of true God, they add: "The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing." They try this also: "The Father is greater than I." Finally, as though with an unanswerable denial of his divinity, they boast that they have overthrown the church's faith when they read again: "But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone." For a nature seems not to be made equal through birth if it differs through the necessity of ignorance; and the Father by knowing and the Son by not knowing would show an unlikeness of divinity, since God ought to be ignorant of nothing, and one who is ignorant is not to be compared with one who knows. But all these things, neither understanding them by reason, nor distinguishing them by times, nor grasping them by the gospel mysteries, nor perceiving them by the force of the sayings, they speak against the nature of divinity with foolish and unlearned madness, quoting only these bare words to fill the ears of the ignorant, keeping silent either about how they are resolved or about their causes; whereas the understanding of sayings is to be sought either from what precedes or from what follows.

Mark 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 18:19 (quotation, medium confidence) · John 17:3 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 13:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:36 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Hilary lists the heretics' proof-texts: Mark 10:18, John 17:3, John 5:19, John 14:28, and Mark 13:32.

  • Quotations: Mark 10:18 (Luke 18:19); John 17:3; John 5:19; John 14:28; Mark 13:32 (Matt 24:36).

Topics: Christology, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.2 (PL 10:281a–282b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.3PL 10:282b–283a

Atque horum quidem superius memoratorum rationem ex ipsis vel evangelicis vel apostolicis professionibus prstituri, admonendos esse omnes communis fidei existimamus: ut in qua confessione ternitas vit est, in eadem sit intelligentiaternitatis. Nescit plane vitam suam, nescit, qui Christum Jesum ut verum Deum ita et verum hominem ignorat. Et ejusdem periculi res est, Christum Jesum vel Spiritum Deum, vel carnem nostri corporis denegare. Omnis ergo qui confitebitur me coram hominibus, confitebor et ego eum coram patre meo, qui est in clis. Qui autem negaverit me coram hominibus, negabo et ego eum coram patre meo, qui est in coelis. Haec Verbum caro factum loquebatur, et homo Jesus Christus Dominus majestatis docebat: Mediator ipse in se ad salutem Ecclesiae constitutus, et illo ipso inter Deum et homines mediatoris sacramento utrumque unus exsistens, dum ipse ex unitis in idipsum naturis, naturae utriusque res eadem est; ita tamen, ut neutro careret in utroque, no forte Deus esse homo nascendo desineret, et homo rursum Deus manendo non esset. Haec itaque humanae beatitudinis fides vera est, Deum et hominem praedicare, Verbum et carnem confiteri: neque Deum nescire quod homo sit, neque carnem ignorare quod Verbum sit.

Before giving the reason for these sayings mentioned above from the very professions of the Gospels or the apostles, we think all who share the common faith must be reminded that in the confession in which eternal life lies, there too lies the understanding of eternity. He plainly does not know his own life, he does not know it, who is ignorant that Christ Jesus is true man as he is true God. And it is a matter of the same peril to deny that Christ Jesus is God the Spirit, or that he is flesh of our body. "Everyone therefore who confesses me before men, I also will confess before my Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven." The Word made flesh said this, and the man Jesus Christ, the Lord of majesty, taught it: himself established in himself as Mediator for the salvation of the church, and by that very mystery of mediator between God and men existing as one who is both, since he himself, from natures united into one, is the same reality of both natures; yet so that he lacked neither in either, lest by being born man he should cease to be God, or again by remaining God he should not be man. This, then, is the true faith of human blessedness: to preach God and man, to confess Word and flesh; neither to be ignorant that God is man, nor to be ignorant that the flesh is the Word.

Matt 10:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:33 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Saving faith confesses Christ as both true God and true man, the one Mediator who unites both natures.

  • Quotation: Matt 10:32–33. Allusions: John 1:14; 1 Cor 2:8; 1 Tim 2:5.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.3 (PL 10:282b–283a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.4PL 10:283a–284a

Cum autem, contra naturam sensus nostri, Deus manens homo nascitur; jam nou est contra naturam spei nostrae, ut natus homo Deus maneat: cum potior natura in inferiorem nata fidem praestet, inferiorem in naturam nasci posse potiorem. Et quidem, secundum legem et consuetudinem mundi, promptior magis spei nostrae, quam divini sacramenti effectus est. Namque mundus in his quae nascuntur habet incrementi virtutem, non habet deminutionis potestatem, Cerne arbores, sata, pecudes. Ipsum quoque participem rationis hominem contuere: semper proficit augmento, numquam vero deminutione contrahitur; nec sese caret, quod excrevit in sese. Nam tametsi aut aetate marcescat, aut morte perimatur; habet quidem aut demutationem in tempore, aut finem in constitutione vivendi: caeterum hoc quod sit non habet in virtute non esse, ut novum se per imminutionem condat ex eodem, id est, ut ex sene decedat in parvulum. Naturae ergo nostrae necessitas in augmentum semper mundi lege provecta, non imprudenter profectum naturae potioris exspectat: cui ei incrementum secundum naturam est, et imminutio contra naturam est. Deo itaque proprium fuit, esse aliud quam manebat, nec tamen non esse quod manserat; nasci in homine Deum, nec tamen Deum esse desinere; contrahere se usque ad conceptum et cunas et infantiam, nec tamen Dei potestate decedere. Hoc non sibi, sed nobis est sacramentum. Neque assumptio nostra Deo profectus est: sed contumeliae suae voluntas, nostra provectio est; dum nec amittit ille quod Deus est, et homini acquirit ut Deus sit.

Since, against the nature of our sense, God, remaining God, is born man, it is no longer against the nature of our hope that, born man, he remains God; for the higher nature, born into the lower, gives faith that the lower can be born into the higher. And indeed, according to the law and custom of the world, the effect is readier for our hope than for the divine mystery. For the world has, in the things that are born, the power of increase, but not the power of diminution. Look at trees, crops, cattle. Consider man himself, a sharer in reason: he always advances by growth, but is never contracted by diminution; nor does he lose himself in what has grown in himself. For although he may wither with age or be cut off by death, he has either change in time or an end in the constitution of living; but what he is, he does not have the power not to be, so as to make himself new by diminution out of the same self, that is, to go back from an old man into a little child. The necessity of our nature, then, always carried forward to growth by the law of the world, not unreasonably expects advancement into a higher nature, since for it increase is according to nature and diminution against nature. It was proper to God, then, to be other than he was remaining, and yet not to cease to be what he had remained; that God should be born in man and yet not cease to be God; that he should contract himself to conception, cradle, and infancy, and yet not depart from the power of God. This mystery is not for himself but for us. Nor is our being taken up an advancement for God; rather his will to suffer humiliation is our promotion, since he does not lose what God is, and gains for man that he should be God.

Notes and citation

Summary: God's being born as man, against nature, grounds the hope that man, whose nature tends to growth, may advance into God.

  • "That he should be God" (ut Deus sit) is Hilary's wording for man's elevation; translated as written.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.4 (PL 10:283a–284a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.5PL 10:284a–284c

Natus igitur unigenitus Deus ex Virgine homo, et secundum plenitudinem temporum in semetipso provecturus in Deum hominem, hunc per omnia evangelici sermonis modum tenuit, ut se filium Dei credi doceret, et hominis filium praedicari admoneret: locutus et gerens homo universa quae Dei sunt, loquens deinde et gerens Deus universa quae hominis sunt; ita tamen, ut ipso illo utriusque generis sermone nuroquam nisi cum significatione et hominis locutus et Dei sit; uno tamen Deo patre semper ostenso, et se in natura unius Dei per nativitatis veritatem professo; nec tamen se Deo patri nou et filii honore et hominis conditione subdente: cum et nativitas omnis se referat ad auctorem, et caro se universa secundum Deum profiteatur infirmam. Hinc itaque fallendi simplices atque ignorantes haereticis occasio est, ut quae ab eo secundum hominem dicta sunt, dicta esse secundum naturae divinae infirmitatem mentiantur: et quia unus atque idem est loquens omnia quae loquatur, de se ipso omnia eum locutum esse contendant.

So the only-begotten God, born man of the Virgin, and in the fullness of times about to advance in himself man into God, kept throughout this manner of gospel speech: he taught that he should be believed the Son of God and urged that he be proclaimed the Son of Man; speaking and doing as man all that is God's, then speaking and doing as God all that is man's; yet so that in that very speech of both kinds he never spoke except with a signifying of both man and God; always showing one God the Father, and professing himself in the nature of the one God through the truth of birth; yet not failing to subject himself to God the Father both by the honour of a son and by the condition of a man, since every birth refers itself to its author, and all flesh professes itself weak before God. Hence the heretics find occasion to deceive the simple and ignorant, falsely claiming that what he said as man was said according to the weakness of the divine nature; and because one and the same is speaking all that he speaks, they contend that he said everything about himself.

Gal 4:4 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ spoke both as God and as man; the heretics take his human sayings as weakness of his divine nature.

  • Allusion: Gal 4:4 ("fullness of times").

Topics: Christology, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.5 (PL 10:284a–284c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.6PL 10:285a–285b

Nec sane negamus, totum illum, qui ejus manet, naturae suae esse sermonem. Sed si Jesus Christus et homo et Deus sit; et neque cum homo, tum primum Deus; neque tum cum et homo, tum non etiam et Deus; neque post hominem in Deo non totus homo totus Deus: unum atque idem necesse est dictorum ejus sacramentum esse, quod generis. Et cum in eo secundum tempus discernis hominem a Deo, Dei tum atque hominis discerne sermonem. Et cum Deum atque hominem in tempore confiteberis, Dei atque hominis in tempore dicta dijudica. Cum vero ex homine ei Deo rursum totius hominis, totius jam Dei tempus intelligis, si quid illud ad demonstrationem ejus temporis dictum est, tempori coaptato quae dicta sunt: ut cum aliud sit ante hominem Deus, aliud sit homo et Deus, aliud sit post hominem et Deum totus homo totus Deus; non confundas temporibus et generibus dispensationis sacramentum, cum pro qualitate generum ac naturarum, alium ei iu sacramento hominis necesse est sermonem fuisse non nato, alium adhuc morituro, alium jam aeterno.

We do not, of course, deny that all his speech, which remains his, belongs to his nature. But if Jesus Christ is both man and God, and neither was he first God when man, nor when also man was he not also God, nor after the man in God is he not wholly man, wholly God, then the mystery of his sayings must be one and the same as that of his kind. And when you distinguish in him man from God according to time, distinguish then the speech of God and of man. And when you confess God and man in time, judge the sayings of God and of man in time. But when, after man and God, you understand again the time of one wholly man and now wholly God, if anything was said to show that time, fit what was said to the time; so that, since God before the man is one thing, man and God another, and wholly man, wholly God after the man and God yet another, you do not confound the mystery of the dispensation by times and kinds, since, according to the quality of the kinds and natures, his speech in the mystery of the man must have been one when he was not yet born, another when he was still to die, another when he is now eternal.

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ's sayings must be distinguished by the three times: God before the incarnation, God and man in the flesh, and wholly God and man after the resurrection.

  • The digital text opens with a fragment of Migne's chapter summary ("nati et morituri, alia aeterni"), removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's chapter summary leaked into the text (a fragment), removed): nati et morituri, alia aeterni. -- → .

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.6 (PL 10:285a–285b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.7PL 10:285b–287a

Nostri igitur causa haec omnia Jesus Christus manens, et corporis nostri homo natus, secundum consuetudinem naturae nostrae locutus est: non tamen omittens naturae suae esse quod Deus est. Nam tametsi in partu et passione et morte naturae nostrae res peregerit; res tamen ipsas omnes virtute naturae suae gessit, dum sibi ipse origo nascendi est, dum pali vult quod eum pati non licet, dum moritur qui vivit. Et tamen cum haec Deus per hominem agit, ex se natus, per se passus, et ex se mortuus; non et hominem se non egit, dum et natus, et passus, et mortuus est. Haec autem jam ante conditionem mundi sacramenta sunt coelestium mysteriorum constituta, ut unigenitus Dens homo nasci vellet, mansuro in aeternum in Deo homine: ut Deus pati vellet, ne passionibus humanae infirmitatis diabolus desaeviens, legem in nobis peccati Deo infirmitatem nostram assumente retineret: ut Deus mori vellet, ne qua insolens potestas adversus Deum esset, neque creatae in se virtutis posset usurpare naturam, cum se immortalis Deus intra legem mortis habuisset. Nascitur itaque Deus assumptioni nostrae, patitur vero innocentiae, postremo moritur ultioni: dum et homo noster in Deo permanet, et infirmitatum nostrarum passiones Deo sociae sunt, et spiritales nequitiae ac malitiae potestates triumpho carnis, Deo per carnem moriente, subduntur.

For our sake, then, Jesus Christ, remaining what he is and born a man of our body, spoke all these things according to the custom of our nature, yet without omitting that his nature is God. For although in birth, suffering, and death he carried through the things of our nature, he still did all those things by the power of his own nature: since he is himself the origin of his own birth, since he wills to suffer what it is not possible for him to suffer, since he who lives dies. And yet, while God does these things through man, born from himself, suffering through himself, and dying of himself, he did not fail to act as man, since he was both born and suffered and died. These mysteries of heavenly secrets were established before the foundation of the world: that the only-begotten God should will to be born man, the man to remain for ever in God; that God should will to suffer, so that the devil, raging through the sufferings of human weakness, might not keep the law of sin in us, God having taken up our weakness; that God should will to die, so that no insolent power should stand against God, nor be able to usurp the nature of the power created in it, since the immortal God had placed himself within the law of death. So God is born for our taking up, suffers for our innocence, and finally dies for vengeance: so that our man abides in God, the sufferings of our weaknesses are partnered with God, and the spiritual powers of wickedness and malice are subdued by the triumph of the flesh, God dying through the flesh.

Eph 1:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 2:15 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ spoke and acted as man for our sake, yet did all by the power of his divine nature, according to a plan fixed before the world.

  • Allusions: Eph 1:4; Eph 6:12; Col 2:15.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.7 (PL 10:285b–287a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.8PL 10:287a–288a

Hujus igitur sacramenti Apostolus conscius, et per Dominum ipsum fidei scientiam adeptus, cum non ignoraret incapacem ejus esse et mundum, et homines, et philosophiam, ait, Videte ne quis vos seducat per philosophiam et inanem deceptionem secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi, et non secundum Jesum Christum: quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter, et estis in illo repleti, quod est caput omnius principatus et potestatis. Exposita itaque habitantis corporaliter divinitatis in eo plenitudine, sacramentum assumptionis nostrae continuo subjecit, dicens: Estis in eo repleti. Ut enim in eo divinitatis est plenitudo, ita nos in eo sumus repleti. Neque sane ait, estis repleti, sed, in eo estis repleti: quia per fidei spem in vitam aeternam regenerati ac regenerandi omnes nunc in Christi corpore manent; replendis postea ipsis, non jam in eo, sed in ipsis, secundum tempus illud de quo Apostolus ait, Qui transfigurabit corpus humilitatis nostrae, conforme corpori gloriae suae. Nunc igitur in eo repleti sumus, id est, per assumptionem carnis ejus, in quo divinitatis plenitudo corporaliter inhabitat. Et hujus spei nostrae non exigua in eo potestas est. Namque quod repleti in eo sumus, hoc est caput ac principium omnis potestatis, secundum illud: Ut in nomine suo omne genu flectat, coelestium, et terrestrium, et infernorum; et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia Dominus Jesus in gloria Dei patris. Confessio itaque haec erit: Jesum in gloria Dei patris, et natum in homine jam non in infirmitate corporis nostri manere, sed in Dei gloria. Et hoc lingua omnis confitebitur. Et cum coelestia et terrestria genu flectent: hoc caput omnis principatus et potestatis est, ut ei universa genu flectendo subjecta sint, in quo sumus repleti, et qui per habitantem in se corporaliter divinitatis plenitudine, in Dei patris sit gloria confitendus.

The apostle, then, aware of this mystery, and having gained the knowledge of faith through the Lord himself, knowing that the world, men, and philosophy could not grasp it, says: "See that no one leads you astray through philosophy and empty deceit according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Jesus Christ; because in him dwells all the fullness of divinity bodily, and you are filled in him, who is the head of all principality and power." Having set forth the fullness of divinity dwelling bodily in him, he at once added the mystery of our being taken up, saying: "You are filled in him." For as the fullness of divinity is in him, so we are filled in him. He does not say, "you are filled," but "you are filled in him," because all who have been or will be regenerated to eternal life through the hope of faith now abide in the body of Christ; they are to be filled afterwards, no longer in him but in themselves, at that time of which the apostle says: "Who will transform the body of our lowliness to be conformed to the body of his glory." Now, then, we are filled in him, that is, through the taking up of his flesh, in whom the fullness of divinity dwells bodily. And this hope of ours has no small power in him. For that in which we are filled is the head and beginning of all power, according to the saying: "That in his name every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." This, then, will be the confession: that Jesus is in the glory of God the Father, and that, born in man, he no longer abides in the weakness of our body but in the glory of God. Every tongue will confess this. And when things in heaven and on earth bow the knee, this is the headship of all principality and power: that all things should be subject to him, bowing the knee, in whom we are filled, and who, through the fullness of divinity dwelling in him bodily, is to be confessed in the glory of God the Father.

Col 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:11 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Col 2:8–10 teaches that we are filled in Christ, in whom the fullness of divinity dwells, and who is confessed in the Father's glory.

  • Quotations: Col 2:8–10; Phil 3:21; Phil 2:10–11.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.8 (PL 10:287a–288a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.9PL 10:288a–288b

Demonstrato autem et naturae suae, et assumptionis nostrae sacramento, cum in eo plenitudine divinitatis manente, nos in eo per id quod homo natus est repleamur: reliquam dispensationem humanae salutis exsequitur, dicens, In quo et circumcisi estis circumcisione non manu facta in exspoliatione corporis carnis, sed in circumcisione Christi consepulti, ei in baptismate, in quo et conresurrexistis per fidem operationis Dei, qui excitavit eum a mortuis. Circumcidimur itaque, non circumcisione carnali, sed circumcisione Christi, id est, in novum hominem renati. Cum enim consepelimur baptismate ejus, mori nos necesse est ex vetere homine; quia regeneratio baptismi resurrectionis est virtus. Et haec circumcisio Christi est, non exspoliari carne praeputii, sed totos commori ei, et per id totos postea ei vivere. In eo enim resurgimus per ejus Dei fidem, qui eum suscitavit a mortuis. Credendus ergo Deus est, cujus operatione Christus excitatus a mortuis est: quia fides ista conresurgit in Christo.

Having shown the mystery both of his nature and of our being taken up, since, while the fullness of divinity abides in him, we are filled in him through his being born man, he goes on to the rest of the dispensation of human salvation, saying: "In whom also you were circumcised with a circumcision not made with hands, in the stripping off of the body of the flesh, but in the circumcision of Christ, buried with him in baptism, in which you also rose with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead." We are circumcised, then, not with a fleshly circumcision but with the circumcision of Christ, that is, reborn into the new man. For when we are buried with him in his baptism, we must die out of the old man, because the regeneration of baptism is the power of resurrection. And this is the circumcision of Christ: not to be stripped of the flesh of the foreskin, but to die wholly with him, and through this afterwards to live wholly for him. For in him we rise again through faith in that God who raised him from the dead. God, then, is to be believed, by whose working Christ was raised from the dead, because this faith rises again in Christ.

Col 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:12 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Col 2:11–12 describes the circumcision of Christ as dying and rising with him in baptism.

  • Quotation: Col 2:11–12.

Topics: Baptism, Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.9 (PL 10:288a–288b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.10PL 10:288b–290a

Consummatur deinde ita omne assumpti hominis sacramentum: Et vos mortui cum essetis in delictis et praeputio carnis vestrae, vivificavit cum illo, donatis vobis omnibus delictis, delens quod adversum nos erat chirographum in sententiis, quod erat contrarium nobis: et ipsum tulit e medio, affigens illud cruci: exutus carnem, et potestates ostentui esse fecit, triumphatis his in semetipso. Aposlolicam fidem saeculi homo non capit, et sensus sui dicta alius praeter quam ipsius sermo non explicat. Deus Christum a mortuis excitat, et Christum in quo corporaliter divinitatis plenitudo inhabitat. Sed convivificavit nos cum illo, donans nobis peccata, et delens chirographum legis peccati, quod per sententias anteriores contrarium nobis erat hoc tollens dc medio, et cruci affigens, mortis lege carne sese spolians, potestates ostentui reddens, triumphatis his in semetipso. Et de triumphatis potestatibus in semetipso, atque ostentui redditis, dcletoque chirographo, vivificatisque nobis, jam superius tractavimus. lloc vero sacramentum quis vel apprehendet, vel cloquetur? Suscitat operatio Dei Christum a mortuis, et haec eadem Dei operatio nos vivificat cum Christo, et haec eadem operatio donat peccata, chirographum delet, et affigit cruci: carnem se exuit, potestates ostentui reddit, ac de his in semetipso triumphat. Habes operationem Dei Christum a mortuis excitantis: habes et Christum haec ipsa in se quae Deus operatur operantem. Christus enim mortuus est, carne se spoiians. Tene ergo Christum hominem a Deo ex mortuis excitatum, tene Deum Christum salutis nostrae operationem cum esset moriturus operantem: ut cum haec Deas operatur in Christo, operans licet Deus, spolians sc tamen Christus carne moriturus Sit: et cum mortuus est Christus, operans ante mortem Deus, mortuum tamen Christum operatio Dei excilet; cum ipse sit Christum a mortuis excitans, qui est ante mortem Christus operatus, et idem sit spolians se carne moriturus.

Then the whole mystery of the man taken up is completed thus: "And you, when you were dead in trespasses and the foreskin of your flesh, he made alive together with him, forgiving you all trespasses, blotting out the handwriting that was against us in decrees, which was contrary to us; and he took it out of the way, nailing it to the cross; having put off the flesh, he made the powers a show, triumphing over them in himself." The man of this world does not grasp the apostolic faith, and no one but the speaker himself explains the words of his meaning. God raises Christ from the dead, the Christ in whom the fullness of divinity dwells bodily. But he made us alive together with him, forgiving us our sins, blotting out the handwriting of the law of sin which through earlier decrees was contrary to us, taking it out of the way and nailing it to the cross, stripping himself of the flesh by the law of death, making the powers a show, triumphing over them in himself. Of the powers triumphed over in himself and made a show, of the handwriting blotted out, and of our being made alive, we have already treated above. But who will grasp or speak this mystery? The working of God raises Christ from the dead; and this same working of God makes us alive with Christ; and this same working forgives sins, blots out the handwriting, and nails it to the cross; it puts off the flesh, makes the powers a show, and triumphs over them in himself. You have the working of God raising Christ from the dead; you have also Christ working in himself these very things that God works. For Christ died, stripping himself of the flesh. Hold, then, that Christ the man was raised from the dead by God; hold that Christ God worked the work of our salvation when he was about to die; so that, when God works these things in Christ, though it is God working, it is still Christ who, stripping himself of the flesh, was to die; and when Christ has died, though God worked before the death, the working of God still raises the dead Christ; since he who raises Christ from the dead is the same who as Christ worked before death, and the same who stripped himself of the flesh when about to die.

Col 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In Col 2:13–15 the same divine working raises Christ and is done by Christ, so Christ is both God who works and man who dies.

  • Quotation: Col 2:13–15. Migne's gloss "(idem sit)" is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's editorial note removed (not Hilary's text)): (idem sit) → .

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.10 (PL 10:288b–290a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.

9.11PL 10:290a–291a

Jamne aposlolicae fidei sacramentum intelligis? Jamne Christum cognitum habes? Quaero enim a te, quis sit carne se spolians, et quae sit caro illa spoliata? Duplicis enim intelligenliae ab Apostolo teneo significationem, spoliatae carnis, seque carne spoliantis: et inter haec Christum audio per operationem Dei a mortuis excitatum. Et cum sit Christum a mortuis excitans Deus, sitque et Christus excitatus a mortuis: interrogo quis est carne se spolians, et quis est Christum a mortuis excitans, nosque vivificans cum Christo? Si enim non idem est Christus mortuus, qui est caro spoliata; carnis spoliatae nomen ostende: et rursus naturam ejus, qui se carne spoliavit, expone. Eumdem enim esse invenio Deum Christum a mortuis excitatum, qui carne se spoliavit, et rursum spoliatam carnem Christum esse a mortuis excitatum: deinde principatus et potestates ostentui reddentem et triumphantem reperio in semetipso. Intelligisne hunc triumphantem potestates iu semetipso? Sentisne quod a se non differat caro spoliata, et carne se spolians? In semetipso enim triumphat, id est, in ea qua se carne spoliavit. Videsne ita Deum et hominem praedicari: ut mors homini, Deo vero carnis excitatio deputetur; non tamen ut alius sit qui mortuus est, et alius sit per quem mortuus resurgit? Spoliata enim caro Christus est mortuus: et rursus Christum a mortuis excitans, idem Christus est carne se spolians. Naturam Dei in virtute resurrectionis intellige: dispensationem hominis in morte cognosce. Et cum sint utraque suis gesta naturis, unum tamen Christum Jesum eum memento esse, qui utrumque est.

Do you now understand the mystery of the apostolic faith? Do you now know Christ? For I ask you who it is that strips himself of the flesh, and what that flesh is that was stripped off? For I hold from the apostle the meaning of a twofold understanding, of the flesh stripped off and of him who strips himself of the flesh; and between these I hear of Christ raised from the dead through the working of God. And since it is God who raises Christ from the dead, and it is Christ who is raised from the dead, I ask who it is that strips himself of the flesh, and who it is that raises Christ from the dead and makes us alive with Christ? For if the dead Christ is not the same as the flesh stripped off, show the name of the flesh stripped off, and again explain the nature of him who stripped himself of the flesh. For I find that the God Christ raised from the dead is the same who stripped himself of the flesh, and again that the flesh stripped off is Christ raised from the dead; then I find him making the principalities and powers a show and triumphing in himself. Do you understand this one who triumphs over the powers in himself? Do you perceive that the flesh stripped off and he who strips himself of the flesh do not differ from each other? For he triumphs in himself, that is, in that flesh of which he stripped himself. Do you see that God and man are so proclaimed that death is assigned to the man and the raising of the flesh to God, yet not so that he who died is one and he through whom the dead rises is another? For the flesh stripped off is the dead Christ; and again, he who raises Christ from the dead is the same Christ who strips himself of the flesh. Understand the nature of God in the power of the resurrection; recognize the dispensation of the man in the death. And since both were done by their own natures, remember nevertheless that he who is both is one Christ Jesus.

Col 2:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 2:15 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The one who stripped off the flesh and the flesh stripped off are one Christ: death belongs to the man, raising to God.

  • Allusion: Col 2:12, 15.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 9.11 (PL 10:290a–291a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/8-50/#p-9-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-9-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.