Against Heresies 1.5.1–1.8.5

Latin text: Harvey 1857 (Latin text: Harvey (1857), transcribed from archive.org OCR of the printed volumes; section numbers checked against Stieren (1853)).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1 (1885), Irenaeus, Against Heresies.

Show

Against 1, chapter 5

1.5.1Harvey 1:41–43

Tria igitur heec cum subsistant secundum eos, unum quidem ex passione, quod erat materia, alterum vero de conversione, quod erat animale: alterum vero quod enixa est, quod est spiritale, sic conversa est in formationem ipsorum. Sed spiritale quidem non potuisse eam formare, quoniam ejusdem substantiae ei erat. Conversam autem in formationem ejus, que facta erat de conversione ejus, animalis substantie, emisisse quoque a Salvatore doctrinas. Et primo quidem formasse eam de animali substantia dicunt Deum Patrem, et Salvatorem, et Regem omnium ejusdem substantiae ei, id est, animalium, quas dextras vocant; et eorum qus ex passione et ex materia, quas sinistras dicunt. Ea enim qus» post eum sunt, eum dicunt formasse latenter motum a matre sua, Unde et Metropatorem, et Apatorem, et Demiurgum eum, et Patrem vocant: dextrorum quidem Patrem dicentes eum, id est, Psychicorum; sinistrorum vero, id est, Hylicorum, Demiurgum: omnium autem Regem. Hane enim Enthymesin volentem in /Eonum honorem omnia facere, imagines dicunt fecisse ipsorum, magis autem Salvatorem per ipsam. Et ipsam quidem in imagine invisibilis Patris conservasse incognitam a Demiurgo. Hune autem unigeniti Filii: reliquorum vero /7Etonum eos, qui ab hoc facti sunt Angeli et Archangeli.

These three things, then, existing according to them, one from the passion, which was matter, another from the turning back, which was the animate (soul), and the third that which she brought forth, which is the spiritual, she turned to their formation. But the spiritual she could not form, because it was of the same substance as herself. Turning to the formation of the animate substance, which had come from her turning back, she brought forth the teachings she had received from the Saviour. And first, they say, she formed from the animate substance God, the Father and King of all, both of those of the same substance as himself, that is, the animate, whom they call the right-hand ones, and of those from the passion and from matter, whom they call the left-hand ones. For they say that he formed all that came after him, being secretly moved by his mother. Hence they call him Metropator (Mother-father), Apator (Fatherless), Demiurge, and Father: Father of the right-hand ones, that is, the psychics, Demiurge of the left-hand ones, that is, the hylics (material ones), and King of all. For this Enthymesis, wishing to make all things in honour of the Aeons, made, they say, images of them, or rather the Saviour made them through her. And she herself, in the image of the invisible Father, remained unknown to the Demiurge; he is in the image of the only-begotten Son; and the angels and archangels made by him are images of the other Aeons.

Notes and citation

Summary: Achamoth forms from soul-substance the Demiurge, Father of the psychics and maker of the material, who with his angels images the Aeons.

  • The Latin has “God, the Father, the Saviour and King of all”; “Saviour” is probably a slip and is omitted (the Greek has “God, Father and King of all”). Debris from Harvey's notes (“Ut scilicet … συζυγος”) is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (debris from Harvey's notes; stray line number): omnium 5ejusdem → omnium ejusdem; Salvatorem 1 Ut scilicet. hee formatio non esset 3 Lwrporáropa because Achamoth, tinguebatur. no other cv{vyos. per ipsam. → Salvatorem per ipsam..

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.1 (Harvey 1:41–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.5.2Harvey 1:43–45

Patrem itaque et Deum dicunt factum eorum quis sunt extra Pleroma, fabricatorem esse omnium Psychicorum et Hylicorum. Separantem enim duas substantias confusas, et de incorporalibus corporalia facientem, fabricasse quz sunt coelestia et terrena, et factum Hylicorum et Psychicorum, dextrorum et sinistrorum fabricatorem, levium et gravium, sursum advolantium, et deorsum devergentium: septem quoque ecelos fecisse, super quos Demiurgum esse dicunt. Et propter hoc Hebdomadam vocant eum, matrem autem Áchamoth Ogdoada, servantem numerum primogenitze et primariae Pleromatis Ogdoadis. Septem autem c«los, quos intellectuales esse dicunt, Angelos autem eos tradunt et Demiurgum et ipsum angelum, Deo autem similem, quemadmodum et Paradisum supra tertium colum existentem virtutem Archangelum quartum dicunt esse, et ab hoc aliquid accepisse Adam conversatum in eo.

So they say that the Father and God who came to be of those outside the Pleroma is the maker of all psychic and hylic things. For separating the two confused substances and making bodily things from incorporeal ones, he made the heavenly and the earthly things, and became the maker of the hylic and psychic, of the right and the left, of the light and the heavy, of what flies upward and what sinks downward. He also made seven heavens, above which, they say, the Demiurge is. And for this reason they call him the Hebdomad, and the mother Achamoth the Ogdoad, preserving the number of the primal and first Ogdoad of the Pleroma. The seven heavens they say are intelligent, and they hold them to be angels; the Demiurge too is himself an angel, but like God; and likewise they say that Paradise, which is above the third heaven, is a fourth archangel in power, and that Adam received something from it when he lived in it.

2 Cor 12:2–4 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Demiurge makes heaven and earth and the seven heavens, above which he dwells as the Hebdomad beneath Achamoth, the Ogdoad.

  • Allusion: 2 Cor 12:2–4 (Paradise and the third heaven).

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.2 (Harvey 1:43–45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.5.3Harvey 1:45–46

Hee autem Demiurgum dicunt a semetipso quidem putasse in totum fabricasse; fecisse autem ea Achamoth. Colum enim fecisse nescientem ccelum, et hominem plasmasse ignorantem hominem, terram autem ostendisse non scientem terram, et in omnibus sic dicunt ignorasse eum figuras eorum, que faciebat, et ipsam matrem; semetipsum autem putasse omnia esse. Causam autem ei fuisse matrem ejus talis operationis dicunt, quz sic voluerit producere eum: caput quidem et initium sus substantism, dominum autem universe operationis. Hanc autem Matrem et Ogdoadem vocant, et Sophiam, et Terram, et Hierusalem, et Spiritum sanctum, et Dominum masculiniter. Habere autem medietatis locum eam, et esse quidem super Demiurgum, subtus autem sive extra Pleroma usque ad finem.

They say that the Demiurge thought he had made all these things wholly of himself, but that Achamoth made them. He made heaven without knowing heaven, formed man without knowing man, brought earth to light without knowing earth; and in everything, they say, he was ignorant of the patterns of what he made, and of the mother herself, and thought that he himself was all. His mother, they say, was the cause of his working in this way, since she wished to bring him forth as head and beginning of his own substance and lord of the whole work. This mother they also call Ogdoad, Sophia, Earth, Jerusalem, Holy Spirit, and, in the masculine, Lord. She holds the place of the middle, being above the Demiurge, but below or outside the Pleroma until the end.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Demiurge makes the world in ignorance of his mother Achamoth, who holds the middle place until the end.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.3 (Harvey 1:45–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.5.4Harvey 1:46–49

Quoniam quidem materialem substantiam ex tribus passionibus constare dicunt, timore, et tristitia, et aporia, de timore quidem et de conversione animalia subsistentiam accepisse: de conversione quidem Demiurgum volunt genesin habuisse: de timore autem reliquam omnem animalem substantiam mutorum animalium, et hominum. Et propter hoc superiorem eum existentem praescire quse sunt spiritalia, et se putasse solum Deum, et per prophetas dixisse, Ego Deus, et prater me nemo. De tristitia autem spiritalia malitie docent facta: unde et diabolum genesin habuisse, quem et Cosmocratorem vocant, et daemonia, et omnem spiritalem malitise substantiam. Sed Demiurgum quidem psychicum filium matris suae dicunt, Cosmocratorem vero creaturam Demiurgi: et Cosmocratorem quidem intelligere ea quae sunt supra eum, quoniam sit epiritalis malitia; Demiurgum vero ignorare, cum sit animalis. Habitare [autem] matrem quidem ipsorum in eo qui sit caelestis [/. supercaelestis ] locus, hoc est in medietate; Demiurgum vero in eo qui sit ecelo locus, hoc est hebdomade: Cosmocratorem vero in eo qui sit secundum nos mundo. De expavescentia vero et aporia, quasi de vesaniori, corporalia, quemadmodum praediximus, mundi elementa facta esse: terram vero secundum expavescentiae statum, aquam vero secundum timoris motum, acrem vero secundum materiae [mcoestitize [ fixionem: ignem vero omnibus iis inesse mortem et corruptelam, quemadmodum et ignorantiam omnibus tribus passionibus inabsconsam doaent.

Since they say that the material substance consists of three passions, fear, grief, and perplexity, the animate things took their existence from fear and from the turning back: from the turning back, they hold, the Demiurge had his origin; from fear, all the rest of the animate substance, of irrational animals and of men. And for this reason he, being [unable] to know the spiritual things, thought that he alone was God, and said through the prophets, “I am God, and besides me there is no one.” From grief, they teach, the spiritual forces of wickedness were made: hence the devil, whom they also call Cosmocrator (World-ruler), and the demons, and all the spiritual substance of wickedness had their origin. They say that the Demiurge is the psychic son of his mother, and the Cosmocrator a creature of the Demiurge; and that the Cosmocrator knows the things above him, being a spiritual wickedness, while the Demiurge is ignorant of them, being animate. Their mother dwells in the heavenly [read: supercelestial] place, that is, in the Middle; the Demiurge in the place that is in heaven, that is, in the Hebdomad; the Cosmocrator in our world. From terror and perplexity, as from the more senseless part, came the bodily elements of the world, as we said before: earth according to the fixity of terror, water according to the movement of fear, air according to the congealing of grief; and fire is inherent in them all, as death and corruption, just as ignorance, they teach, is hidden in all three passions.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Isa 45:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: From fear, grief, and perplexity come the Demiurge, the devil and the demons, and the four elements of the world.

  • The Latin as printed says the Demiurge, “being superior, foreknows the spiritual things”, which contradicts the context; the surviving Greek says he was unable to know them, and the translation follows the sense. Quotation: Isa 45:5 (46:9). Harvey's margin reference is removed. Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. The bracketed reading is Harvey's. Allusion: Eph 6:12.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: digits for 'iis'; margin reference debris (Isa 45); stray line number): 5superiorem → superiorem; nemo, ἘΜ. χὶν. 56; De → nemo. De; omnibus 118 inesse → omnibus iis inesse.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.4 (Harvey 1:46–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.5.5Harvey 1:49

Cum fabricasset igitur mundum, fecit et hominem choicum, non autem ab hac arida terra, sed ab invisibili substantia, et ab effusili et fluida materia accipientem: et in hunc insufflasse psychicum definiunt. Et hune aese secundum imaginem et similitudinem faetum: secundum imaginem quidem hylicum esse, proximum quidem, sed non ejusdem substantiae esse Deo: secundum similitudinem vero psychicum, unde et spiritum vite substantiam ejus dictam, cum sit ex spiritali defluitione. Post deinde circumdatam dicunt ei dermatinam tunicam: hanc autem sensibilem carnem esse volunt.

Having made the world, then, he also made the earthy man, taking him not from this dry land but from the invisible substance, from the fluid and flowing matter; and into him, they declare, he breathed the psychic man. And this is the man made “according to the image and likeness”: according to the image, the hylic, near to God but not of the same substance; according to the likeness, the psychic; hence his substance is also called “the spirit of life”, since it comes from a spiritual outflow. Afterwards, they say, he was clothed with the “garment of skin”; and this they hold to be the perceptible flesh.

Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:21 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Demiurge makes the earthy man and breathes the psychic man into him; the “garments of skin” are the flesh.

  • Allusions: Gen 1:26; Gen 2:7; Gen 3:21.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.5 (Harvey 1:49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.5.6Harvey 1:49–51

Partum vero matris ipsorum, quze est Achamoth, quem secundum inspectionem eorum Ángelorum qui sunt erga Salvatorem generavit, existentem ejusdem substantie matri suse spiritalem, et ipsum enim ignorasse Demiurgum dicunt: et latenter depositum esse in eum, nesciente eo, uti per eum in eam quz ab eo esset animam seminatum, et in materiale hoc corpus, gestatum quoque velut in utero in iis et amplificatum, paratum fiat ad susceptionem perfects rationis. Latuit igitur, quemadmodum dicunt, Demiurgum conseminatus insufflationi ejus a Sophia spiritalis homo, inenarrabili virtute et providentia. Quemadmodum enim Matrem suam ignoravit, sic et semen ejus. Quod etiam ipsum Ecclesiam esse dicunt, exemplum superioris Ecclesie: et huno esse in semetipsis hominem volunt, uti habeant animam quidem a Demiurgo, corpus autem a limo, et carneum a materia, spiritalem vero hominem a matre Achamoth.

The offspring of their mother Achamoth, which she bore by contemplating the angels around the Saviour, being spiritual and of the same substance as its mother, the Demiurge too, they say, did not know; and it was secretly deposited in him without his knowledge, so that, sown through him into the soul that came from him and into this material body, carried in them as in a womb and growing, it might become ready to receive the perfect Word. So, as they say, the spiritual man, sown by Sophia together with his breathing, escaped the Demiurge's notice by unspeakable power and providence. For as he did not know his mother, so he did not know her seed. This seed, they say, is the Church, a copy of the upper Church. And they hold that this is the man within themselves: so that they have the soul from the Demiurge, the body from the slime and the fleshly part from matter, but the spiritual man from the mother Achamoth.

Notes and citation

Summary: Achamoth's spiritual seed is secretly sown in the Demiurge's man; the Valentinians claim to be this spiritual Church.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: digit for 'a'): carneum 8 materia → carneum a materia.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.6 (Harvey 1:49–51; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-5-6).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-5-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 6

1.6.1Harvey 1:51–53

Cum sint igitur tria, alterum materiale (quod etiam sinistrum vocant) ex necessitate perire dicunt, quippe cum nullam spirationem incorruptele recipere possit: Animale vero (quod etiam dextrum appellant) cum sit medium spiritalis et materialis, iluc redigi, quocunque declinaverit: Spiritale vero emissum esse, uti hic animali conjunetum formetur, coéruditum ei in conversatione. Et hoc esse dicunt, sal, et lumen mundi. Opus erat enim animali sensibilibus disciplinis. Ob quam causam et mundum fabricatum dicunt, et Salvatorem autem ad hoc venisse animale, quia suze potestatis est, ut id salvet. — Quse enim salvaturus erat, eorum primitias eum suscepisse dicunt: ab Achamoth quidem spiritale, à Demiurgo autem indutum psychicum (id est animalem) Christum, a dispositione autem circumdatum corpus, animnalem habens substantiam, paratum vero inenarrabili arte, ut et visibile, et palpabile, et passibile fieret. Et hylicum autem nihil omnino suscepit: non enim esse hylicum capacem salutis. Consummationem vero futuram, cum formatum et perfectum fuerit scientia omne spiritale, hoc est, homines qui perfectam agnitionem habent de Deo, et hi qui ab Achamoth initiati sunt mysteria: esse autem hos semetipsos dicunt.

There being, then, three kinds, the material (which they also call the left), they say, must necessarily perish, since it cannot receive any breath of incorruption; the animate (which they also call the right), being midway between the spiritual and the material, passes to whichever side it inclines; and the spiritual was sent forth so that it might be formed here, joined to the animate and trained together with it in this life. And this, they say, is “the salt” and “the light of the world”. For the animate needed perceptible instruction. For this reason, they say, the world was made, and the Saviour came to the animate for this purpose, since it has free will, in order to save it. For they say that he took up the firstfruits of what he was to save: from Achamoth the spiritual; from the Demiurge he put on the psychic (that is, animate) Christ; and from the dispensation he was clothed with a body that has animate substance, prepared with unspeakable art so that it became visible, tangible, and passible. But he took up nothing whatever hylic, for the hylic is not capable of salvation. The consummation will come when everything spiritual has been formed and perfected by knowledge, that is, the men who have perfect knowledge of God and have been initiated into the mysteries by Achamoth; and these, they say, are themselves.

Matt 5:13–14 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians teach that the material perishes, the animate may be saved, and the spiritual, which they claim to be, will be perfected by knowledge.

  • Allusion: Matt 5:13–14.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.6.1 (Harvey 1:51–53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-6-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-6-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.6.2Harvey 1:53–54

Erudiuntur autem psychica (id est animalia) psychici (id est animales) homines, qui per operationem et fidem nudam firmantur, et non perfectam agnitionem habent. Esse autem hos nos, qui sumus ab Ecclesia, dicunt. Quapropter et nobis quidem necessariam esse bonam conversationem respondent: aliter enim impossibile esse salvari. Semetipsos autem non per operationem, sed eo quod sint naturaliter spiritales, omnimodo salvari dicunt. Quemadmodum enim choicum impossibile est salutem percipere, (non enim esse illum capacem salutis dicunt,) sic iterum quod spiritale (quod semetipsos esse volunt) impossibile esse corruptelam percipere, licet in quibuscunque fuerint factis. Quemadmodum enim aurum in ceno depositum non amittit decorem suum, sed suam naturam custodit, cum coenum nihil nocere auro possit: sic et semetipsos dicunt, licet in quibuscunque materialibus operibus sint, nihil semetipsos noceri, neque amittere spiritalem substantiam.

The psychic (that is, animate) things are taught to the psychic (that is, animate) men, who are established by works and bare faith and do not have perfect knowledge. These, they say, are we who belong to the Church. Therefore they reply that good conduct is necessary for us, for otherwise it is impossible to be saved; but they themselves, they say, will be saved in every case, not by works, but because they are spiritual by nature. For just as the earthy cannot receive salvation (for they say it is not capable of salvation), so again the spiritual (which they claim to be) cannot receive corruption, whatever deeds it may be engaged in. For just as gold laid in mud does not lose its beauty but keeps its own nature, since the mud can do the gold no harm, so they say of themselves that, whatever material deeds they are engaged in, they are in no way harmed, nor do they lose their spiritual substance.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians say that church members need good works to be saved, but that they themselves, being spiritual by nature, are saved whatever they do.

Topics: Heresy, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.6.2 (Harvey 1:53–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-6-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-6-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.6.3Harvey 1:54–56

Quapropter et intimorate omnia que vetantur hi, qui sunt ipsorum perfecti, operantur, de quibus Seripturs confirmant, quoniam qui faciunt ea, Regnum Dei non hareditabunt. Etenim idolothyta indifferenter manducant, nihil inquinari ab its putantes, et in omnem diem festum ethnicorum pro voluntate factum primi conveniunt; uti in nihilo quidem abstineant, quod est apud Deum et apud homines odiosum muneris homicidiale spectaculum. Quidam autem et carnis voluptatibus insatiabiliter inservientes, carnalia carnalibus, spiritalia spiritalibus reddi dicunt. Et quidam quidem ex ipsis clam eas mulieres, que discunt ab eis doctrinam hane, corrumpunt: quemadmodum multe sepe ab iis suassm, post converse mulieres ad Ecclesiam Dei, cum reliquo errore et hoc confess sunt. Alii vero et manifeste, ne quidem erubescentes, quascunque adamaverint mulieres, has a viris suis abstrahentes, suas nuptas fecerunt. Alii vero valde modeste initio, quasi eum sororibus fingentes habitare, procedente tempore manifestati sunt, gravida sorore a fratre facta.

For this reason the “perfect” among them do without fear all the forbidden things, of which the Scriptures declare that “those who do them will not inherit the kingdom of God.” They eat food offered to idols without scruple, thinking that they are in no way defiled by it; and they are the first to gather at every pagan festival held for pleasure, so that they do not even abstain from the murderous spectacle of the gladiatorial show, hateful to God and men. Some, serving the pleasures of the flesh insatiably, say that fleshly things are to be rendered to the fleshly and spiritual things to the spiritual. Some of them secretly seduce the women who learn this doctrine from them; many women, often persuaded by them and afterwards converted to the Church of God, have confessed this along with the rest of their error. Others, openly and without even blushing, have taken whatever women they fell in love with away from their husbands and made them their own wives. Others again, very modestly at first, pretending to live with them as with sisters, were exposed as time went on, when the sister was made pregnant by the brother.

Gal 5:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:9–10 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus charges the Valentinian “perfect” with eating idol food, attending games, and seducing or taking other men's wives.

  • Quotation: Gal 5:21 (1 Cor 6:9–10); the margin reference is removed. “Murderous spectacle” refers to the gladiatorial games. Irenaeus's charges are polemical and are translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (margin reference debris (Gal 5:21)): hareditabunt, cat v.21. Etenim → hareditabunt. Etenim.

Topics: Heresy, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.6.3 (Harvey 1:54–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-6-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-6-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.6.4Harvey 1:56–59

Et alia multa odiosa et irreligiosa facientes, nos quidem, qui per timorem Dei timemus etiam usque in mentibus nostris et sermonibus peccare, arguunt quasi idiotas,.et nihil Bclentes; semetipsos extollunt, perfectos vocantes, et semina electionis. Nos enim in usu gratiam accipere dicunt, quapropter et auferri à nobis: semetipsos autem proprie possidere, desursum ab inenarrabili et innominabili syzygia descendentem habere gratiam, et propterea adjici eis. Quapropter ex omni modo oportere eos semper syzygie meditari mysterium. Et hoc suadent insensibilibus iis sermonibus dicentes sic: Quicunque in seculo est, et uxorem non amat, ut ei conjungatur, non est de veritate, et non transiet in veritatem. Qui autem de seculo est mixtus mulieri, non transit in veritatem: quoniam in concupiscentia mixtus est mulieri. Quapropter nobis quidem, quos psychicos vocant, et de saeculo esse dicunt, necessariam continentiam, et bonam operationem, uti per eam veniamus in medietatis locum. Sibi autem, spiritalibus et perfectis vocatis, nullo modo. Non enim operatio in Pleroma inducit, sed semen quod est inde pusillum quidem emissum, hic autem perfectum factum.

And doing many other hateful and irreligious things, they reproach us, who through the fear of God are afraid to sin even in our thoughts and words, as simple people who know nothing; and they exalt themselves, calling themselves perfect and seeds of election. For they say that we receive grace for use, and therefore it will be taken away from us; but that they possess it as their own, having grace that came down from above from the unspeakable and unnameable conjunction, and therefore it will be increased for them. For this reason they must always practise the mystery of conjunction in every way. And they persuade the senseless of this with these words: “Whoever is in the world and does not love a woman so as to be united with her is not of the truth and will not pass into the truth; but whoever is of the world and has intercourse with a woman does not pass into the truth, because he has intercourse with a woman in lust.” Therefore for us, whom they call psychic and say are of the world, continence and good works are necessary, so that by them we may come to the place of the middle; but for themselves, called spiritual and perfect, in no way. For it is not works that bring one into the Pleroma, but the seed sent forth from there in infancy and here brought to perfection.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians call church members simple and claim grace as their own possession, saying that the spiritual must practise the mystery of conjunction and need no works.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. Debris (“MASSUET”, a stray digit) is removed. The saying about women is quoted from the Valentinians and is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (running-head debris (Massuet); stray digit): quapropter M.ASSUET et auferri → quapropter et auferri; habere 0 gratiam → habere gratiam.

Topics: Heresy, Marriage, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.6.4 (Harvey 1:56–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-6-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-6-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 7

1.7.1Harvey 1:59

Cum autem universum semen perfectum fuerit, Achamoth quidem matrem ipsorum transire de medietatis loco dicunt, et intra Pleroma introire, et recipere sponsum suum Salvatorem, qui est ex omnibus factus, uti syzygia fiat Salvatoris et Sophie, que est Achamoth. Et hoc esse sponsum et sponsam: nymphonem vero universum Pleroma. Spiritales vero exspoliatos animas, et spiritus intellectuales factos, inapprehensibiliter et invisibiliter intra Pleroma ingreasos, sponsas reddi iis qui circa Salvatorem sunt angelis. Demiurgum vero transire et ipsum in matris suse Sophie locum, hoc est, in medietatem. Justorum quoque animas frefrigerare et ipsas in medietatis loco. Nihil enim psychicum intra Pleroma transire. His autem factis ita, is qui latet in mundo ignis ardescens et comprehendens, universam materiam consumit, et ipsum simul consumptum abire in id, ut jam non sit. Demiurgum autem nihil horum cognovisse ostendunt ante Salvatoris adventum.

When all the seed has been perfected, they say, their mother Achamoth will pass from the place of the middle and enter the Pleroma, and receive her bridegroom, the Saviour, who was made from all, so that a conjunction may come about of the Saviour and Sophia, who is Achamoth. And this is the bridegroom and the bride, and the bridal chamber is the whole Pleroma. The spiritual, stripped of their souls and become intelligent spirits, will enter the Pleroma beyond grasp and unseen, and be given as brides to the angels around the Saviour. The Demiurge too will pass into the place of his mother Sophia, that is, into the middle. The souls of the righteous will also find rest in the place of the middle; for nothing psychic passes within the Pleroma. When these things have been done in this way, the fire that lies hidden in the world, blazing up and seizing all matter, will consume it and be consumed together with it and pass into non-existence. They show that the Demiurge knew none of these things before the Saviour's coming.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: At the end Achamoth enters the Pleroma as bride of the Saviour, the spiritual become brides of his angels, the righteous rest in the middle, and fire consumes matter.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray line number): 5inapprehensibiliter → inapprehensibiliter.

Topics: Heresy, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.7.1 (Harvey 1:59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-7-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-7-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.7.2Harvey 1:60–62

Sunt autem qui dicunt emisisse eum Christum filium suum, sed et animalem: et de hoc per Prophetas locutum esse. Esse autem hunc qui per Mariam transierit, quemadmodum aqua per tubum transit, et in hune in baptismate descendisse illum qui esset de Pleromate ex omnibus Salvatorem in figura columba: fuisse autem in eo et illud quod est ab Achamoth semen spiritale. Dominum igitur nostrum ex quatuor iis compositum fuisse dicunt, servantem typum primogenite et primes quaternionis; de spiritali, quod erat ab Achamoth: et de animali, quod erat de Demiurgo: et de dispositione, quod erat factum inenarrabili arte: et de Salvatore, quod erat illa, quse descendit in eum columba. Et hunc quidem impassibilem perseverasse: (non enim possibile erat pati eum, cum esset incomprehensibilis et invisibilis) et propter hoc ablatum esse, cum traheretur ad Pilatum, illum qui depositus erat in eum spiritus Christi. Sed ne id quidem quod a matre erat semen, passum esse dicunt. Impassibile enim et illud, quippe spiritale, et invisibile etiam ipsi Demiurgo. Passus est autem secundum hos animalis Christus, et ille qui ex dispositione fabricatus in mysterio, ut ostendat per eum mater typum superioris Christi, illius qui extensus est Cruci, et formavit Achamoth formationem secundum substantiam: omnia enim hsc exempla illorum esse dicunt.

Some say that he also emitted a Christ, his own son, but animate, and that he spoke about him through the prophets. This is the one who passed through Mary as water passes through a pipe; and on him at his baptism there descended, in the form of a dove, that Saviour from the Pleroma who is from all; and there was in him also the spiritual seed from Achamoth. So they say that our Lord was composed of these four, preserving the type of the primal and first Tetrad: of the spiritual, which was from Achamoth; of the animate, which was from the Demiurge; of the dispensation, which was made with unspeakable art; and of the Saviour, which was the dove that descended on him. This last remained impassible (for he could not suffer, being incomprehensible and invisible), and for this reason the Spirit of Christ that had been placed in him was taken away when he was brought before Pilate. And they say that not even the seed from the mother suffered, for it too was impassible, being spiritual and invisible even to the Demiurge. According to them, the one who suffered was the animate Christ, and the one fashioned from the dispensation in a mystery, so that through him the mother might show a type of the upper Christ, the one who was stretched upon the Cross and gave Achamoth her formation according to substance. For they say that all these things are copies of those.

Matt 3:16 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some Valentinians make the Lord a composite of four elements, of which only the animate Christ and his fashioned body suffered.

  • Valentinian Christology, reported by Irenaeus and translated as written. Allusion: Matt 3:16 (the dove at the baptism).

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.7.2 (Harvey 1:60–62; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-7-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-7-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.7.3Harvey 1:62–63

Eas vero que habuerunt semen id quod est ab Achamoth animas, meliores dicunt fuisse quam reliquas: quapropter et plus eas dilectas a Demiurgo, non sciente causam, sed a semetipso putante esse tales. Quapropter et in prophetas, aiunt, distribuebat eas, et sacerdotes, et reges. Et multa de [ab] hoc semine dicta per prophetas exponunt: quippe cum altioris naturs esset. Multa autem et matrem de superioribus dixisse dicunt; sed et per huno, et per eas, que ab hoc facts sunt anims. Ac deinceps dividunt prophetias, aliquid quidem a matre dictum docentes, aliquid a semine, aliquid autem ab ipso Demiurgo: et Jesum tantundem aliquid quidem [a] Salvatore[m] dixisse, aliquid a matre, aliquid a Demiurgo, quemadmodum ostendemus procedente nobis sermone.

They say that the souls that had the seed from Achamoth were better than the rest; and that for this reason they were loved more by the Demiurge, who did not know the cause but thought they were such because of himself. For this reason, they say, he distributed them among prophets, priests, and kings. And they expound many things spoken through the prophets as spoken by this seed, since it was of a higher nature. And they say that the mother too spoke many things about the higher realities, but through him and through the souls made by him. And so they divide the prophecies, teaching that some were spoken by the mother, some by the seed, and some by the Demiurge himself; and likewise that Jesus spoke some things from the Saviour, some from the mother, and some from the Demiurge, as we shall show as our account proceeds.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians divide the words of the prophets and of Jesus among the mother, the spiritual seed, and the Demiurge.

  • The words in square brackets in the Latin are Harvey's.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.7.3 (Harvey 1:62–63; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-7-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-7-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.7.4Harvey 1:63–65

Demiurgum autem, quippe ignorantem qu essent super eum, moveri quidem in iis quz dicuntur, contempsisse vero ea, aliam atque aliam causam putantem, quam [sive] spiritus qui prophetat, habens et ipse suam aliquam motionem, sive hominem, sive perplexionem pejorum: et sic ignorantem conservasse usque ad adventum Cum venisset autem Salvator, didicisse eum ab eo omnia dicunt, et in gaudium ei cessisse cum omni virtute sua, et eum esse illum in Evangelio Centurionem, dicentem Salvatori: Et ego enim sub potestate mea habeo milites et servos, et quod juesero, faciunt. Perfecturum autem eum eam, quae secundum ipsum est, mundi creationem, usque ad id tempus quod oportet, maxime autem propter Ecclesise diligentiam atque curam, et propter agnitionem preparati praemii, quoniam in locum matris transibit.

The Demiurge, being ignorant of what was above him, was moved by what was said but despised it, thinking it had one cause or another: either the prophetic spirit, which itself has some motion of its own, or the man, or the intermingling of the worse; and so he remained ignorant until the coming [of the Saviour]. When the Saviour came, they say, he learned everything from him and gladly went over to him with all his power; and he is the centurion in the Gospel who says to the Saviour, “For I too have soldiers and servants under my authority, and what I command they do.” And he will complete the creation of the world that is his to make, until the time required, chiefly because of his care and concern for the Church, and because of his knowledge of the reward prepared for him, namely that he will pass into the place of the mother.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Matt 8:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 7:8 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Demiurge, ignorant until the Saviour came, then learned from him and is figured by the centurion of the Gospel.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. Quotation: Matt 8:9 (Luke 7:8).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letters for 'et'): σέ quod → et quod.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.7.4 (Harvey 1:63–65; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-7-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-7-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.7.5Harvey 1:65

Hominum autem tria genera dicunt, spiritale, psychicum, choicum, quemadmodum fuit Cain, Abel, Seth; ut ostendant et ex his tres naturas, jam non secundum unumquemque, sed secundum genus. Et Choicum quidem in corruptelam abire: Animale vero, si meliora elegerit, in loco medietatis refrigeraturum: si vero pejora, transire et ipsum ad similia. Spiritalia vero inseminat Achamoth, ex illo tempore usque nunc, propter quod et anims erudientur quidem hic: et semina enutrita, quia pusilla emittantur, post deinde perfectione digna habita, sponsas reddi Salvatoris Angelis respondent; animabus eorum ex necessitate in medietaje cum Demiurgo refrigeraturis in seternum. Et ipsas autem animas rursus subdividentes, dicunt quasdam quidem natura bonas, quasdam autem natura malas. Et bonas quidem has esse, quae capaces seminis fiunt: alias vero natura nequam, nunquam capere illud semen.

They say there are three kinds of men: spiritual, psychic, earthy, as were Cain, Abel, and Seth, so as to show from these the three natures, no longer in each individual but by kind. The earthy goes to corruption; the animate, if it chooses the better, will find rest in the place of the middle, but if the worse, it too will pass to its like. The spiritual seeds Achamoth has been sowing from that time until now in righteous souls, so that they are trained here and nourished, because they are sent forth in infancy, and afterwards, judged worthy of perfection, they reply, are given as brides to the Saviour's angels, while their souls necessarily rest for ever in the middle with the Demiurge. And subdividing the souls again, they say that some are good by nature and some evil by nature: the good are those that become capable of the seed; the others, worthless by nature, never receive that seed.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Gen 4:1–2 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 4:25 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians make Cain, Abel, and Seth types of the earthy, animate, and spiritual natures, and divide souls into good and evil by nature.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. “In righteous souls” follows the sense of the Greek; the Latin as printed omits it. Allusion: Gen 4:1–2, 25.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.7.5 (Harvey 1:65; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-7-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-7-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 8

1.8.1Harvey 1:65–67

Cum sit igitur tale illorum argumentum, quod neque Prophete predieaverunt, neque Dominus docuit, neque A postoli tradiderunt, quod abundantius gloriantur plus quam ceteri cognovisse, de iis guise non sunt scripta legentes, et quod solet dici, de arena resticulas nectere affectantes, fide digna aptare eonantur iis que dicta sunt, vel parabolas dominicas, vel dictiones propheticas, aut sermones apostolicos, ut figmentum illorum non sine teste esse videatur; ordinem quidem et textum Scripturarum supergredientes, et quantum in ipsis est, solventes membra veritatis. Transferunt autem et transfingunt, et alterum ex altero facientes, seducunt multos ex iis que aptant ex dominicis eloquiis male composito phantasmati. Quomodo si quis regis imaginem bonam fabricatam diligenter ex gemmis pretiosis a sapiente artifice, solvens subjacentem hominis figuram transferat gemmas illas, et reformans faciat ex iis formam canis, vel vulpecule, et hane male dispositam; dehinc confirmet et dicat, hanc esse regis illam imaginem bonam, quam sapiens artifex fabricavit, ostendens gemmas, quse bene quidem a primo artifice in regis imaginem composite erant, male vero a posteriore in canis figuram translate sunt, et per gemmarum phantasiam decipiat idiotas, qui comprehensionem regalis forms non habeant, et suadeat quoniam turpis vulpecule figura illa est bona regis imago: eodem modo et hi anicularum fabulas assumentes [adsuentes], post deinde sermones, et dictiones, et parabolas hine inde auferentes, adaptare volunt fabulis suis eloquia Dei. Et quanta quidem iis, qui [qus] sunt intra Pleroma, aptant, diximus.

Such, then, is their system, which neither the prophets proclaimed, nor the Lord taught, nor the apostles handed down, but which they boast of knowing more abundantly than others. Reading from things that are not written, and, as the saying goes, trying to weave ropes from sand, they try to fit to their claims, plausibly, things that have been said, whether the Lord's parables, or the prophets' sayings, or the apostles' words, so that their fiction may not seem to be without witness. They disregard the order and connection of the Scriptures and, as far as in them lies, dismember the truth. They transfer and refashion, and making one thing out of another they deceive many by the badly assembled fantasy they fit together from the Lord's words. It is as if someone, taking a fine image of a king carefully made by a skilful artist out of precious stones, were to break up the underlying figure of the man, rearrange the stones, and refashion them into the shape of a dog or a fox, and that badly put together; and then were to insist that this is the fine image of the king which the skilful artist made, pointing to the stones, which were well arranged by the first artist into the king's image but badly transferred by the second into the shape of a dog; and by the show of the stones were to deceive the simple who have no conception of the king's form, and persuade them that this ugly figure of a fox is the fine image of the king. In the same way these people stitch together old wives' fables, and then, snatching words, sayings, and parables from here and there, try to fit the words of God to their fables. We have said how much they fit to the things within the Pleroma.

1 Tim 4:7 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus compares the heretics' use of Scripture to rearranging the jewels of a king's mosaic into the image of a fox.

  • “Ropes from sand” is a proverb for wasted labour. The words in square brackets in the Latin are Harvey's alternative readings. Allusion: 1 Tim 4:7 (“old wives' fables”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray digits): quoniam 11000 turpis → quoniam turpis.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.8.1 (Harvey 1:65–67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-8-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-8-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.8.2Harvey 1:67–69

Quanta autem de iis, qui [que] extra Pleroma sunt ipsorum, ad suos insinuare conantur ex Scripturis, sunt talia: Dominum in novissimis mundi temporibus propter hoc venisse ad passionem dicunt, ut ostendat, que circa novissimum /Eonum facta est, passionem, et per hunc finem manifestet finem ejus, que est eirca /Eonas, dispositionis. Duodecim autem annorum virginem illam archisynagogi filiam, quam insistens Dominus a mortuis liberavit. typum esse narrant Achamoth. quam extensus Christus eorum figuravit, et ad sensibilitatem adduxit ejus, quod dereliquerat eam, luminis. Quoniam autem ei manifestavit semetipsum Salvator, existenti extra Pleroma in abortionis partu [parte], Paulum dicunt dixisse in prima ad Corinthios epistola: Novissime autem tanquam abortivo visus est et mihi. Et illami quz est cum cosetaneis Salvatoris adventationem ad Achamoth, similiter manifestasse eum in eadem epistola dicentem: Oportere mulierem velamen habere in capite propter Angelos. Et quoniam adventante Salvatore ad eam, propter verecundiam velamen imposuit Achamoth in faciem suam. Et passiones autem, quas passa est, significasse Dominum dicunt': in hoc quidem, quod derelicta est a lumine; in eo, cum dicit in cruce: Deus meus, Deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? manifestasse eum, quoniam derelicta est a lumine Sophia, et prohibita est ab Horo in priora impetum facere. Taedium autem ejus, in eo quod dixisset: Quam tristis est anima mea Timorem autem, in eo quod dixerit: Pater, si possibile est, transeat a me calix. Et aporiam autem (id est consternationem) similiter in eo. quod dixerit: Et quid dicam nescto.

The things they try to suggest to their followers from the Scriptures concerning what is outside their Pleroma are such as these. They say that the Lord came to his passion in the last times of the world for this reason: to show the passion that happened to the last of the Aeons, and by this end to reveal the end of the dispensation concerning the Aeons. The twelve-year-old girl, the daughter of the ruler of the synagogue, whom the Lord stood over and raised from the dead, they say is a type of Achamoth, whom their Christ, stretched out, formed and brought to perception of the light that had left her. And since the Saviour appeared to her when she was outside the Pleroma, in the state of an untimely birth, they say that Paul said in the first letter to the Corinthians, “Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.” And the coming of the Saviour with his companions to Achamoth, they say, he likewise showed in the same letter when he said, “A woman ought to have a veil on her head because of the angels.” And because, when the Saviour came to her, Achamoth put a veil on her face out of modesty. And they say that the Lord signified the passions she suffered: that she was abandoned by the light, when he says on the cross, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” He showed by this that Sophia was abandoned by the light and prevented by Horos from rushing forward. Her grief, when he said, “How sorrowful is my soul”; her fear, when he said, “Father, if it is possible, let the cup pass from me”; and her perplexity (that is, bewilderment) likewise, when he said, “And what shall I say, I do not know.”

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Mark 5:41–42 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 34:33 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 27:46 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 22:1 (21:2 LXX) (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 26:38 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:39 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:27 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians read Jairus's daughter, Paul's “untimely birth”, the veiled woman, and the cries of Jesus's passion as figures of Achamoth.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. Allusion and quotations: Mark 5:41–42 (Luke 8:42); 1 Cor 15:8; 1 Cor 11:10; Exod 34:33; Matt 27:46 (Ps 22:1); Matt 26:38; Matt 26:39; John 12:27 (the last in a form not found in the Gospel text). A running head (“PERVERSIONES”), a page number, and margin debris are removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letters for 'si'; margin debris and page number; running head and page number): est pue vill 41 eirca → est eirca; a mortuis PERVERSIONES.. 69 liberavit. → a mortuis liberavit.; Pater, δὲ possibile → Pater, si possibile.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.8.2 (Harvey 1:67–69; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-8-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-8-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.8.3Harvey 1:69–73

Tria autem genera hominum [sic] ostendisse docent eum; hylicum quidem, in eo quod responderit dicenti: Sequar te? Non habet filius hominis ubi caput reclinet. Animale autem, in eo quod dixerit dicenti: Sequar te, permitte autem mihi ire et renunciare domesticis; Nemo super aratrum manum imponens, et in posteriora respiciens, aptus est regno colorum. — Hunc autem dicunt de mediis esse. Et illum autem similiter, qui multas partes justitice confitebatur se fecisse, post deinde noluisse [no- lentem] sequi, sed a divitiis victum, ut ne fieret perfectus, et hunc de psychico genere fuisse volunt. Spiritale vero, in eo quod dicit: Remitte mortuos sepelire mortuos suos, tu autem vade et annuncia regnum Det; Et Zaccheo publicano, dicens: Properans descende, quoniam hodie in domo tua oportet me manere. Et fermenti parabolam, quod mulier abscondisse dicitur in farinae sata tria, tria genera manifestare dicunt. Mulierem quidem Sophiam dici docent; farinse vero sata tria, tria genera hominum, spiritale, animale, choicum. Fermentum vero ipsum Salvatorem dictum dicunt. Et Paulum autem manifeste dixisse choicos, animales, spiritales. Alibi quidem: Qualis choicus, tales et choici. Alibi autem: Animalis homo non percipit que sunt gpirifus. Alibi autem: Spiritalis evaminat omnia. Id autem, Animalis autem non percipit que sunt spiritus, de Demiurgo dictum dicunt, qui cum l'sychicus sit. non cognoverit neque matrem spiritalem existentem, neque semen ejus, neque eos qui sunt in Pleromate /Eones. Quoniam autem eorum quos salvaturus erat Salvator initia accepit, Paulum dixisse: E si delibatio sancta, et massa. Delibationem quidem, quod est spiritale dictum docentes: conspersionem autem nos, id est psychicam Ecclesiam, cujus substantiam assumpsisse dicunt eum, et cum semetipso erexisse, quoniam erat ipse fermentum.

They teach that he showed the three kinds of men: the hylic, when he replied to the one who said, “I will follow you”: “The Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head”; the animate, when he said to the one who said, “I will follow you, but let me first go and take leave of my household”: “No one who puts his hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of heaven.” This one, they say, is of the middle kind. And likewise that man who professed to have done many parts of righteousness, but afterwards was unwilling to follow, being overcome by riches so as not to become perfect, they hold to have been of the psychic kind. The spiritual, when he says, “Let the dead bury their dead, but you go and proclaim the kingdom of God”; and when he said to Zacchaeus the tax collector, “Make haste and come down, for today I must stay in your house.” And the parable of the leaven, which a woman is said to have hidden in three measures of flour, they say shows the three kinds: the woman, they teach, means Sophia; the three measures of flour, the three kinds of men, spiritual, animate, earthy; and the leaven, they say, means the Saviour himself. And they say Paul plainly spoke of the earthy, the animate, and the spiritual: in one place, “As was the earthy, so are those who are earthy”; in another, “The animate man does not receive the things of the Spirit”; in another, “The spiritual man judges all things.” And the saying “The animate man does not receive the things of the Spirit” they say was spoken of the Demiurge, who, being psychic, knew neither the mother, who is spiritual, nor her seed, nor the Aeons in the Pleroma. And since the Saviour took up the firstfruits of those he was to save, Paul said, “If the firstfruits are holy, so is the lump”; teaching that the firstfruits means the spiritual, and the lump means us, that is, the psychic Church, whose substance, they say, he assumed and raised up with himself, since he himself was the leaven.

Matt 8:19–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 9:61–62 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:16–22 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 9:60 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 19:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:33 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:48 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians find their three kinds of men in Jesus's sayings to would-be followers, the parable of the leaven, and Paul's letters.

  • Quotations and allusions: Matt 8:19–20 (Luke 9:57–58); Luke 9:61–62; Matt 19:16–22; Luke 9:60 (Matt 8:22); Luke 19:5; Matt 13:33 (Luke 13:21); 1 Cor 15:48; 1 Cor 2:14; 1 Cor 2:15; Rom 11:16. Margin references and Harvey's supplement mark (“Suppl.”) are removed. “Animate” renders animalis (Greek psychikos).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Harvey's supplement marks; OCR digit and margin reference debris (1 Cor 2); margin reference debris (1 Cor 15); margin reference debris over 'choici' (1 Cor 15:48); stray marks): manere...*. → manere.; choicos, 1 Cor.xv.4& animales → choicos, animales; tales et Cors. chor. → tales et choici.; 4nimalis homo non percipit que sunt 1Cori.!& gpirifus → Animalis homo non percipit que sunt gpirifus; (Suppl. Id autem, [ Animalis → Id autem, Animalis.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.8.3 (Harvey 1:69–73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-8-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-8-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.8.4Harvey 1:73

Et quoniam erravit Achamoth extra Pleroma, et formata est a Christo, et qusesita est a Salvatore, manifestare eum dicunt, in eo quod disit, semetipsum venisse ad eam quse errasset ovem. Ovem enim errantem matrem suam referunt dici, ex qua eam, qua sit hie, volunt esse seminatam Ecclesiam. Errorem autem, eam, que est extra Pleroma, in omnibus passionibus immorationem, ex quibus factam materiam tradunt. Mulierem auterh illam que mundat domum, et invenit drachmam, superiorem — Sophiam narrant dici: que cum perdidisset intentionem suam, post deinde, mundatis omnibus per Salvatoris adventum, invenit eam: quoniam et haec restituitur secundum eos intra Pleroma. Simeon autem eum qui in manus suas accepit Christum, ei gratias egit Deo, et dixit: Nunc remittis seroum tuum, Domine, secundum sermonem tuum in pace, typum esse Demiurgi dicunt, qui veniente Salvatore didicit transpositionem suam, et gratias egit Bytho. Et per Annam, que in Evangelio dicitur septem annis cum viro tirisse, reliquum autem omne tempus vidua perseverasse, donec vidisset, Salvatorem, et agnovisset eum, et loqueretur de eo omnibus, manifestissime Achamoth significari dicunt: que cum ad modicum vidisset tunc Salvatorem cum coaetaneis suis postero omni tempore perseverans in medietate, sustinebat eum, quando iterum veniat et reponat eam sus conjugationi. Et nomen autem ejus significatum a Salvatore, in eo quod dixerit: Justificata est Sapientia a filiis ejus: et a Paulo autem sic: Sapientiam autem loquimur perfectis. Et conjugationes autem quae sunt intra Pleroma Paulum dixisse dicunt, in uno ostendentem; de ea enim conjugatione, que est secundum hano vitam scribens ait: Hoc enim mysterium magnum est; dico autem tn Christo et Ecclesia.

And since Achamoth wandered outside the Pleroma, was formed by Christ, and was sought by the Saviour, he showed this, they say, when he said that he had come to the sheep that had gone astray. For they say that the wandering sheep means their mother, from whom they hold that the Church here was sown; and the wandering means her lingering in all the passions outside the Pleroma, from which they teach that matter came to be. The woman who sweeps the house and finds the drachma they say means the upper Sophia, who, having lost her Intention, afterwards found it when all things had been cleansed by the Saviour's coming; for this too, according to them, is restored within the Pleroma. Simeon, who took Christ in his arms and gave thanks to God and said, “Now you let your servant depart, Lord, according to your word, in peace,” they say is a type of the Demiurge, who, when the Saviour came, learned of his change of place and gave thanks to Bythus. And by Anna, who in the Gospel is said to have lived seven years with her husband and to have remained a widow all the rest of her time, until she saw the Saviour and recognized him and spoke of him to all, they say Achamoth is most plainly signified, who, having seen the Saviour for a short time with his companions, remained all the following time in the middle, waiting for him to come again and restore her to her conjunction. And her name, they say, was indicated by the Saviour when he said, “Wisdom is justified by her children”, and by Paul thus: “We speak wisdom among the perfect.” And they say that Paul spoke of the conjunctions within the Pleroma, showing them in one instance; for writing of the conjunction that belongs to this life he says, “This mystery is great; but I speak of Christ and the Church.”

Luke 15:4–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 15:8–9 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 2:28–29 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 2:36–38 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 7:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 5:32 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The lost sheep, the lost coin, Simeon, Anna, and texts on wisdom and marriage are made into figures of Achamoth, the Demiurge, and the conjunctions.

  • Allusions and quotations: Luke 15:4–6 (Matt 18:12); Luke 15:8–9; Luke 2:28–29; Luke 2:36–38; Luke 7:35 (Matt 11:19); 1 Cor 2:6; Eph 5:32. Margin references and a long passage of Harvey's notes that had intruded into the text are removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (intrusion from Harvey's notes; margin reference (1 Cor 2:6); margin reference (Eph 5:32); margin reference (Luke 15:8); margin reference (Luke 2); stray mark; stray marks): ex qua "2 eam → ex qua eam; Mulierem auterh Luc xv. 8 illam → Mulierem auterh illam; intra Pleroma. luc. ii.9¢ Simeon → intra Pleroma. Simeon; Nunc ! remittis → Nunc remittis; , δὲ inter se, Keri potest; si vero Soteri consubstantivos (ambigue enim positum ἐπvent) qua erit eminentia ejus enter satellites → ; autem 1cor.ii. 6. quae → autem quae; dico autem Eph. v.32. tn Christo → dico autem tn Christo.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.8.4 (Harvey 1:73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-8-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-8-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.8.5Harvey 1:73

Adhuc autem Johannem discipulum Domini docent primam ogdoadem, et omnium generationem significasse ipsis dictionibus. Itaque principium quoddam subjecit, quod primum factum est a Deo: quod etiam Nun vocat et filium: et unigenitum Domini vocat, in quo omnia Pater praemisit seminaliter. Ab hoc autem aiunt Verbum emissum, et in eo omnem /Eonum substantiam, quam ipsum postea formavit Verbum. Quoniam igitur de prima genesi dicit, bene a principio, hoc est a Filio, et Verbo doctrinam facit. Dicit autem sic: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud. Deum, & Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Prius distinguens in tria, Deum, et Principium, et Verbum, iterum ea univit, uti et emissionem ipsorum utrorumque ostendat, id est, Filii et Verbi. et eam quz» est ad invicem simul et ad Patrem unionem. Iu Patre enim et ex Patre principium, in principio autem et ex principio Verbum. Bene igitur dixit, In principio erat Verbum; erat enim in Filio: Et Verbum erat apud Deum: etenim principium. Et Deus erat Verbum, consequenter; quod enim ex Deo natum est, Deus est. Hic enim erat in principio apud Deum, ostendit emissionis ordinem. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Omnibus enim iis qui post eum sunt /Eonibus, formationis et generationis causa Verbum factum est. Sed quod factum est in eo, inquit, vita est: hic enim syzygias manifestavit: Omnia enim, ait, per tpsum facta sunt, vita autem in ipso. Hee ergo que in eo facta est, proximior est quam ea que per ipsum facta sunt: cum ipso est enim, et per ipsum fructificat. Quoniam infert, Et vita erat luae hominum. Hominem autem nunc et Ecclesiam simili nomine significavit, ut per unum nomen manifestet syzygiae communionem. Ex Logo enim et Zoe Homo generatur et Ecclesia. Lumen autem dixit hominum vitam, quoniam illuminati sunt ab ea, quod est formatum et manifestatum. Hoc autem et Paulus dicit: Omne enim quod manifestatur lumen est. Quoniam igitur vita manifestavit et generavit Hominem et Ecclesiam,. lumen dicta est eorum. Aperte igitur manifestavit Johannes per sermones hos, et alia, et quaternationem secundam, Logon et Zoen, Anthropon et Ecclesiam. Sed et primam significavit tetradem. Narrans enim de Salvatore, et docens omnia, que extra Pleroma sunt, per eum formata, fructum quoque eum esse dicens intra Pleroma. Etenim lumen dixit illum quod in tenebris lucet, et non comprehenditur ab eis, quoniam omnia que facta sunt ex passione formans, ignoratus est ab eis. Et Filium et Veritatem et Vitam dicit eum, et Verbum carnem factum: cujus gloriam vidimus, ait, et erat gloria ejus qualis erat unigeniti, que a Patre data est ei, plena gratia et veritate. autem sic: Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitaett in nobis, el vidimus gloriam ejus, gloriam quasi unigeniti a Patre, plenum gratia et veritate. Diligenter igitur ostendit primam quaternationem, Patrem dicens, et Gratiam, et Monogenem, et Veritatem. Sic Johannes de prima et matre omnium /Eonum ogdoade dixit. Patrem enim dixit, et Gratiam, et Monogenem, et Veritatem, et Verbum, et Vitam, et Hominem, et Ecclesiam.

Further, they teach that John, the disciple of the Lord, signified the first Ogdoad and the generation of all things in these very words. He posited a certain Beginning, which was first made by God, which he also calls Nus and Son, and calls the Only-begotten [God], in whom the Father emitted all things as seed. From him, they say, the Word was emitted, and in him the whole substance of the Aeons, which the Word himself afterwards formed. Since, then, he speaks of the first generation, he rightly begins his teaching from the Beginning, that is, from the Son, and from the Word. He speaks thus: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; he was in the beginning with God.” First distinguishing three, God, the Beginning, and the Word, he again unites them, to show both the emission of each of the two, that is, of the Son and of the Word, and their union with each other and with the Father. For the Beginning is in the Father and from the Father, and the Word in the Beginning and from the Beginning. He rightly said, then, “In the beginning was the Word”, for he was in the Son; “and the Word was with God”, for so was the Beginning; “and the Word was God”, consequently, for what is born of God is God. “He was in the beginning with God”: this shows the order of emission. “All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made”: for to all the Aeons that come after him the Word was the cause of formation and generation. “But what was made in him,” he says, “is life”: here he revealed a conjunction. For “all things,” he says, “were made through him,” but life “in him”. This, then, which came to be in him, is closer than what was made through him; for it is with him, and bears fruit through him. For he adds, “And the life was the light of men.” By saying “men” he now signified Anthropos and Ecclesia by one name, to show by one name the communion of the conjunction; for from Logos and Zoe are generated Anthropos and Ecclesia. He called life the light of men because they are enlightened by it, that is, formed and made manifest; and Paul says this too: “For everything that is made manifest is light.” Since, then, life manifested and generated Anthropos and Ecclesia, it was called their light. John, then, by these words and others plainly showed the second Tetrad, Logos and Zoe, Anthropos and Ecclesia. But he also signified the first Tetrad. For speaking of the Saviour, and teaching that all things outside the Pleroma were formed through him, he also says he is the fruit of the Pleroma. For he calls him the light that shines in the darkness and is not grasped by it, since, forming all things that came from the passion, he was unknown to them. And he calls him Son, Truth, Life, and the Word made flesh, “whose glory we have seen,” he says; and his glory was such as was that of the Only-begotten, given him by the Father, “full of grace and truth.” [He speaks] thus: “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only-begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.” So he carefully showed the first Tetrad, naming the Father, Grace, the Only-begotten, and Truth. Thus John spoke of the first Ogdoad, the mother of all the Aeons. For he named the Father, Grace, the Only-begotten, Truth, the Word, Life, Man, and Church.

John 1:1–2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3–4 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 5:13 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians read the prologue of John's Gospel as a description of their first eight Aeons.

  • This is the Valentinian (Ptolemaean) exegesis of John 1, reported by Irenaeus. Quotations: John 1:1–2; John 1:3–4 (punctuated, as the Valentinians read it, “what was made in him is life”); Eph 5:13; John 1:5; John 1:14. A Harvey's note “[leg. emisit]”, margin references, and stray Greek letters are removed. A word is missing before the full quotation of John 1:14; “[He speaks]” is supplied. The Latin “unigenitum Domini” is probably a slip for “Only-begotten God” (so the Greek); “[God]” is supplied.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Harvey's note on an alternative reading, removed; OCR: Greek letters for 'et'; margin reference (John 1:3) and Greek letters for 'et'; stray Greek character; stray line number): Nun vocat οὖ filium → Nun vocat et filium; [leg. emisit] → ; iterum 2. ea univit → iterum ea univit; Omnia per ipsum jon. 1.3. facta sunt, σέ sine → Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine; luae hominum. ὃ Hominem → luae hominum. Hominem.

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.8.5 (Harvey 1:73; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-5-1/#p-1-8-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-8-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).