On First Principles 3.1.24–3.2.7

Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.

Show

On 3, chapter 1

3.1.24GCS 22:243

Verum quoniam sermo apostoli in his quidem, quae de vasis honoris vel contumeliae dicit, quia »si quis se ipsum mundaverit, erit vas ad honorem, sanctificatum et utile domino, ad omne opus bonum paratum«, nihil videtur in deo posuisse, sed totum in nobis, in his vero in quibus ait: »Potestatem habet figulus luti de eadem massa facere aliud quidem vas ad honorem, aliud autem ad contumeliam«, totum videtur ad deum rettulisse: non est accipiendum ista sibi esse contraria, sed uterque sensus ad unum vocandus, et duobus unus effici debet intellectus, id est, ut neque ea, quae in nostro arbitrio sunt, putemus sine adiutorio dei effici posse, neque ea, quae in dei manu sunt, putemus absque nostris actibus et studiis et proposito consummari; scilicet quo neque nos vel velle aliquid vel efficere ita in nostro habeamus arbitrio, ut non scire debeamus hoc ipsum, quod possumus vel velle vel efficere, a deo nobis datum esse secundum eam distinctionem, quam supra diximus; nec rursum cum deus fingit »vasa, alia quidem ad honorem, alia vero ad contumeliam«, putandum est quod honoris vel contumeliae causa tamquam materiam quandam nostras vel voluntates vel proposita vel merita habet, ex quibus singulos nostrum vel »ad honorem« vel »ad contumeliam« fingat, dum motus animae et propositum mentis de se suggerat illi, quem non latet cor et cogitatio animi, utrum »ad honorem« fingi vas eius, an »ad contumeliam« debeat. Sed sufficiant ista a nobis, prout potuimus, de liberi arbitrii quaestionibus agitata.

But since the apostle's words, in what he says about vessels of honour or dishonour, that “if anyone cleanses himself, he will be a vessel for honour, sanctified and useful to the Lord, prepared for every good work,” seem to place nothing in God but everything in us, while in the words, “The potter has power to make from the same lump one vessel for honour and another for dishonour,” he seems to refer everything to God, these must not be taken as contrary to each other, but both senses must be brought together and one understanding made out of the two: namely, that we should neither think that the things in our choice can be accomplished without the help of God, nor think that the things in God's hand are brought to completion without our acts and efforts and purpose. That is, we do not have it in our own choice to will or to accomplish anything in such a way that we need not know that this very ability to will or to accomplish has been given us by God, according to the distinction we made above; nor again, when God fashions “vessels, some for honour and some for dishonour,” must it be thought that he has our wills or purposes or merits as a kind of material, the cause of honour or dishonour, from which he fashions each of us either “for honour” or “for dishonour,” while the movement of the soul and the purpose of the mind suggest of themselves to him, from whom the heart and the thought of the mind are not hidden, whether its vessel ought to be fashioned “for honour” or “for dishonour.” But let these things suffice that we have discussed, as best we could, concerning the questions of free choice.

2 Tim 2:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:21 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Paul's two sayings about vessels must be read together: nothing in our power is done without God's help, and nothing in God's hand is completed without our acts and purpose.

  • Sources: 2 Tim 2:21; Rom 9:21.
  • The last long sentence is obscure in Rufinus and is translated literally; the point of the argument (compare the Greek, Philoc. 21.24) is that the soul's own movement and purpose determine whether its vessel is made for honour or for dishonour.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.24 (GCS 22:243; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-1-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-24) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

On 3, chapter 2

3.2.1PG 11:303a–305a

Videndum nunc est (l6) secundum Scripturas, quomodo contrariae virtutes. vel ipse diabolus, reluctantur humano generi provocantes et instigantes ad peccatum. Et primo quidem in Genesi serpens Evam seduxisse describitur 7‘; de quo in Ascensione Moysi (l7), cujus libelli meminit in Epistola sua apostolus Judas, Michael archangelus cum diabolo disputans de corpore Moysi, ait a diabolo inspiratum serpentem (l8) causam exstitisse praevaricationis Adte et Eva: τ’. Sed et illud requiritura quibusdam, quis est angelus qui de ctelo loquitur ad Abraham dicens: Nunc cognovi quoniam ιιι times Deum, et non pepercisti tilio tuo dilecto quem dilexisti pro me . Manilestc enim angelus fuisse describitur, qui dicit cognovisse se tunc quia timeret Deum Abraham, et non pepercisset lilio suo dilecto, sicut Scriptura dicit: sed non declaravit, quia pro Deo, sed pro se, hoc est pro eo qui hoc dicebat. llequireudum est etiam illud de quoin Exodo dicitur", quia voluerit interficere Moysem pro eo quod abibat in IEgyptum. Sed et postea quis est qui exterminator angelus dicitur: necnon et ille qui sit qui in Levitico scriptus est Apopompwus, id est transmissor, de quo ait ila Scriptura : Sors una domino, etsors una Apopompaeo, id est transmissori . Sed et in primo libro Regnorum spiritus pessimus Saulcm dicitur clior-are . ln tertio vero libro Michmas propheta dicit: ι, Vidi Dominum lsrael sedentem super tltnnum suum, etomnis militia εωιὶ stabat circa eum a dextris ejus, eta sinistris ejus. Et dixit Dominus : Quis seducet Achab regem Israel (il), ut ascendat et cadat in llamoth Galaad? Et dixit iste sic, et ille dixit sic. Exiit spiritus, et stetit in conspectu Domini, et dixit: Ego sedueam eum. Et dixit Dominus ad eum : in quo? Et dixit : Exeam etero spiritus mendax in ore omnium prophetarum ipsius Et dixit: Seduces, et quidem poteris. Exi ergo, et fac cito sic. Et nunc dedit Dominus spiritum meudacem in ore omnium prophetarum tuorum; Dominus locutus est super te mala ττ. Manifesm enim per hoc ostenditur voluntate et proposito suo elegisse spiritus quidam ut seduceret et mendacium operaretur quo abuteretur Dominus ad necem Achab qui boc pati dignus erat. lu primo quoque libro Paralipomenon, ε 8ιιεςίιιινίι,ἶ inquit, diabolus Satan in lsrael,et concitavit David ut numeraret populum . 1η Psalmis vero angelus malus atterere dicitur quosdam. In Ecclesiaste quoque Salomon ait : Si spiritus potestatem habentis ascenderit super te , locum tuum nejdimittas. quoniam sanitas compescet peccata multa . ln Zacharia vero legimus diabolum stantem a dextris Jesu , et resistentem ei . Isaias vero ait gladium Domini exsurgere super draconem serpentem perversum . Quid autem dicam dc Ezechiel in secunda visione ad principem 'l‘yri manifestissime de virtute conο traria prophetaute, qui etiam in fluminibus Egypli draconem dicit habitare? Totus autem liber qui scriptus est de Job, quid aliud quam de diabolo continet, petente potestatem sibi dari omnium, quae habet Iob, et filiorum eius, insuper et corporis eius? Qui tamen per eius patientiam vincitur. In quo libro multa responsis suis edocuit dominus de adversante nobis virtute draconis istius. Haec interim cx Veteri Testamento, quantum ad praesens memorite succurrere potuerunt, dicta sint de eo quod contraria: virtutes vel nominantur in Scripturis, vel humano generi dicuntur adversari, postmodum puniendis. Videamus autem et itt Novo Testamento, ubi Satanas ad Salvatorem accedit, tetttans eum ; spiritus vero maligni et daemonia immunda, qua: aliquantus obsederant, fugata sunt a Salvatore de corporibus patientium, qui et liberati ab eo dicunlnr. Sed et ludas, cum jam diabolus misisset in cor ejus ut traderet Christum , postea etiam totum Satanam suscepit in sese : scriptum est enim quia post burcellam introivit in illum Satanas. Paulus vero apostolus docet nos non debere dare locum diabolo, sed induite, inquit, arma Dei, ut possitis rtsistere adversus astutias diaboli ; tlesiguatts «luctamen esse sanctis non adversus carnem rtsanguincm, sed adversus principatus , adversus potestates, adversus mundi hujus rectores tenebrarum, adversus spiritalia nequitiae in ctelcstiitus. Sed et Salvatorem crucifixum esse dicit a principibus hujus mundi qui destruenturJ quorum etiam sapientiam dicit se non loqui . Per haec igitur omnia docet nos Scriptura divina, esse quosdam invisibiles hostes dimicantes adversus nos, et prteripitarmari nos debere contra eos. Unde et simpliciores quique Domino Christo credentium existimant, quod omnia peccata qumcunque commiserint homines, ex istis contrariis virtutibus mentem delinquentium perurgentibus fiant, pro eo quod in certatnine isto invisibili superiores inveniantur potestates. Quod si , verbi causa, diabolus non ενα, nemo hominum omnino delinquerct. Ξ.

We must now see, according to the Scriptures, how the opposing powers, or the devil himself, struggle against the human race, provoking and inciting it to sin. First, in Genesis the serpent is described as having led Eve astray; concerning which, in the Ascension of Moses, a little book that the apostle Jude mentions in his epistle, the archangel Michael, disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, says that the serpent, inspired by the devil, was the cause of the transgression of Adam and Eve. Some also ask who the angel is who speaks from heaven to Abraham, saying: "Now I know that you fear God, and you have not spared your beloved son, whom you loved, for my sake." For he is plainly described as an angel, who says that he knew then that Abraham feared God and had not spared his beloved son, as Scripture says; but he did not declare that it was for God's sake, but for his own, that is, for the one who said this. We must also inquire about the one of whom it is said in Exodus that he wished to kill Moses because he was going into Egypt; and afterwards, who is the one called the destroying angel; and also who is the one written of in Leviticus as Apopompaeus, that is, 'the one who sends away', of whom Scripture says: "One lot for the Lord, and one lot for Apopompaeus," that is, the sender-away. In the first book of Kingdoms, too, an evil spirit is said to choke Saul. And in the third book the prophet Micaiah says: "I saw the Lord of Israel sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven stood around him, on his right and on his left. And the Lord said: Who will deceive Ahab king of Israel, that he may go up and fall at Ramoth Gilead? And one said this, and another said that. A spirit came out and stood before the Lord and said: I will deceive him. And the Lord said to him: By what means? And he said: I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said: You shall deceive him, and indeed you shall prevail. Go out, then, and do so quickly. And now the Lord has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all your prophets; the Lord has spoken evil against you." By this it is clearly shown that a certain spirit chose by its own will and purpose to deceive and to work falsehood, which the Lord made use of for the death of Ahab, who deserved to suffer this. In the first book of Chronicles also: "The devil Satan stirred up Israel, and incited David to number the people." In the Psalms an evil angel is said to afflict certain people. In Ecclesiastes, too, Solomon says: "If the spirit of one who has power rises up against you, do not leave your place, for healing will check many sins." In Zechariah we read of the devil standing at the right hand of Jesus and resisting him. Isaiah says that the sword of the Lord rises up against the dragon, the crooked serpent. And what shall I say of Ezekiel, who in his second vision prophesies most plainly to the prince of Tyre about the opposing power, and who says that the dragon dwells in the rivers of Egypt? And the whole book written about Job, what else does it contain than an account of the devil, who asks that power be given him over all that Job has, and over his sons, and even over his body? Yet he is overcome through Job's patience. In that book the Lord taught many things in his answers about the power of this dragon that opposes us. These things, meanwhile, as far as they could come to mind at present, have been said from the Old Testament about how the opposing powers are either named in the Scriptures or said to oppose the human race, and are to be punished afterwards. Let us look also at the New Testament, where Satan comes to the Saviour, tempting him; and the evil spirits and unclean demons that had besieged certain people were driven by the Saviour from the bodies of the sufferers, who are said to have been set free by him. Judas too, when the devil had already put it into his heart to betray Christ, afterwards received Satan wholly into himself; for it is written that after the morsel Satan entered into him. And the apostle Paul teaches us that we should not give place to the devil, but, he says, "put on the armour of God, that you may be able to resist the wiles of the devil," indicating that the saints' struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. He also says that the Saviour was crucified by the rulers of this world, who are coming to nothing, whose wisdom he also says he does not speak. Through all these things, then, divine Scripture teaches us that there are certain invisible enemies fighting against us, and that we must arm ourselves against them. Hence the simpler of those who believe in the Lord Christ think that all the sins people commit come about from these opposing powers pressing on the minds of sinners, because in that invisible contest the powers are found to be superior; so that if, for example, there were no devil, no human being would sin at all.

Gen 3:1–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Jude 1:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 22:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 4:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 12:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 16:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 16:14 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 22:19–23 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Chr 21:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 78:49 (77:49 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Eccl 10:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Zech 3:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 27:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 28:2–19 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ezek 29:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 4:1–11 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:2 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:11–12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6–8 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Scripture shows hostile powers inciting human beings to sin, from the serpent in Eden to the rulers who crucified the Lord, so that simpler believers think all sin comes from them.

  • Sources: Gen 3:1–6; Jude 9 and the Assumption (Ascension) of Moses; Gen 22:12; Exod 4:24; Exod 12:23; Lev 16:8 (the scapegoat, LXX ἀποπομπαῖος); 1 Sam 16:14; 1 Kgs 22:19–23; 1 Chr 21:1; Ps 78:49 (77:49 LXX); Eccl 10:4 (LXX 'healing will check great sins'); Zech 3:1; Isa 27:1; Ezek 28:2–19 and 29:3; Job 1–2; Matt 4:1–11; John 13:2, 27; Eph 4:27; Eph 6:11–12; 1 Cor 2:6–8.
  • 'First and third book of Kingdoms' are 1 Samuel and 1 Kings in the English Bible.
  • Migne's footnotes printed inside the text are removed by logged corrections.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (label of Migne's parallel version): INTERI'RETATIO → .

Extrabiblical texts: As. Mos. (Assumption of Moses; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.1 (PG 11:303a–305a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.2PG 11:305a–307a

Nos vero rationem dilucidiusiutuentes, hazc ita esse non arbitramur, considerantes ea qua) manifcsle ex corporali necessitate descendunt. λιι vero putandum est quod diabolus esuriendi vel sitiendi causa nobis exsistat? Neminem esse puto qui hoc audeat aflirmare. Si ergo esuriendi et sitiendi non nobis ipse sit causa, quid aliud cum uniuscujusque mtas ad virilitatis tempus advenerit, et naturalis caloris incentiva suggesserit? Consequens est sine deuio, utsicut esuriendi et sitiendi diabolus causa nflu est, ita nec ejus quidem motus qui adulta: tutati munraliter suggeritur, id est appetendi coitus desidcriutn. Quam causam non utique sempera diabolo mereri eertum est, ita ut putandum sit quia si diabolus non esset, hujuscemodi admistionis desiderium corpora non haberent. Tum deinde consideretuus si, ut superius ostendimus, cibus hominibus non ex diabolo, sed naturali quodam appetitur instinctu, utrum posset fieri ut si diabolus npn esset, humana experientia tanta in percipiendo cibo disciplina uteretur, ut nunquam penitus excederet modum, id est, ut vel aliter quant res' posceret, vel amplius quatn.ratio indulgeret, acciperet. et nunquam eveniret hominibus in servando cibi tundo mensuraque delinquere. Ego quidem non arliitrnr hoc ab hominibus ita potuisse servari, etiamsi nulla diaboli provocasset instinctio, ut iu percipiendo cibo modum (‘25) disciplinamque nullus excederet, priusquam id longo usu experientiaque didicissent. Quid igitur est?lu escis quidem et potu possibile erat delinquere nos etiam sine diaboli incitamentis, si forte minus continentes, vel tniuus industrii fuissemus inventi; in appetendo vero coitu, vel naturalibus desideriis temperandis, putandum est quod non simile aliquid paterenntflArbitror autem quod eadem rationis consequentia etiam in czeleris naturalibus motibus possit intelligi, cupiditatis, vel ita), vel tristitite, vel iu omnibus omnino quae per intemperantiae vitium, modum mensura: naturalis excedunt. Evidens igitur (Ἦ) ratio cst, quia sicut in bouis rebus humanum propositum solum per seipsum imperfectum est ad consummationem boni, atljutOrio namque divino ad perfecta qutequc perducitur; itactiam itt contrariis initia quaedam, et velut quaedam semina peccatorum ab Itis rebus qute iu usu naturaliter habentur, accipimus. Cum vero ittdulserimus ultra quam Satis est, etnon restiterimus adversus primos intemperantiae motus, tunc primi hujus delicti accipiens locum virtus inimica insngat et perurget omnibus modis, studens profusius dilatare peccata, etquidem nobis hominibus occasiones et initia prtcbentibus peccatorum, inimicis autem potestatibus latius ea et longius, et si tieri potest absque ullo fine propagantibus. Ita denique in avaritiam lapsus edicitur, cum primo homines parum quid pecunia: desiderant, deinde augescente vitio cupiditas increscit. Post hoc jam cum etiam caecitas mentis ex passione successerit, inimicis virtutibus suggerentibus ac perure gentibus, pecunia jam non desideratur, sed rapitur, et vi, aut etiam sanguinis humani profusione couquiritur. Ad certiorem denique rei (idem, quod immensitates istae vitiorum a daemonibus veniant, contemplari etiam ex eo facile potest, quod nihil minus his qui corporaliter vexantur a daemonibus, etiam illi patiuntur, qtti vel immoderatis amoribus, vel ira: intemperantia, vel nimietate tristitiae perurgentttr. Nam et itt nonnullis historiis refertur, quod iu insaniam quidam ex amore deciderunt, aliiJ ex iracundia, nonnulli ex tristitia, vel nimio gaudio: quod arbitror ex eo accidere, quia contraria: ista: virtutes, id est daemones, loco sibi ineorum mentibus dato, quem intemperantia prius patefecerit, sensum eorum penitus possederint: maxime cuin nulla eos ad resistendum virtutis gloria concitarit.‘

But we, looking at the reasoning more clearly, do not think this is so, considering the things that come plainly from bodily necessity. Are we to think that the devil is the cause of our being hungry or thirsty? I think no one would dare to affirm it. If then he is not the cause of our hunger and thirst, what else [is he the cause of] when a person's age has reached the time of manhood and the incentives of natural heat have prompted him? It follows without doubt that, as the devil is not the cause of hunger and thirst, so neither is he the cause of that motion which nature prompts at a mature age, that is, the desire for intercourse. It is certain that this cause is by no means always stirred up by the devil, as if we had to think that, if there were no devil, bodies would have no desire for such union. Then let us consider whether, if, as we showed above, food is sought by people not from the devil but by a kind of natural instinct, it could happen, if there were no devil, that human experience would use such discipline in taking food as never to exceed the measure at all, that is, never to take it otherwise than the matter required or in greater quantity than reason allowed, and that it would never happen to people to err in keeping to the measure and limit of food. I for my part do not think that people could have kept this, even if no instigation of the devil had provoked them, so that no one would exceed the measure and discipline in taking food, before they had learned it by long use and experience. What then? In food and drink it was possible for us to sin even without the devil's incitements, if we happened to be found less self-controlled or less careful; and are we to think that in desiring intercourse, or in tempering the natural desires, we should not suffer something similar? I think the same line of reasoning can be applied to the other natural motions as well, of desire, or anger, or sadness, or in all things whatever that exceed the limit of natural measure through the vice of intemperance. The reasoning is plain, then: as in good things the human purpose by itself alone is incomplete for the accomplishment of the good, for it is brought to perfection by divine help, so also in the contrary we receive certain beginnings, and as it were certain seeds of sins, from the things we naturally use. But when we have indulged beyond what is enough and have not resisted the first motions of intemperance, then the hostile power, seizing the opening given by this first fault, incites and presses us in every way, striving to spread sins more widely; we human beings provide the occasions and beginnings of sins, while the hostile powers propagate them more widely and further, and, if possible, without any end. So, finally, the fall into avarice comes about: at first people desire a little money; then, as the vice grows, greed increases. After this, when blindness of mind has also followed from the passion, with the hostile powers prompting and pressing, money is no longer desired but seized, and acquired by violence or even by the shedding of human blood. For a surer proof that these monstrous excesses of vice come from demons, it can easily be seen that those who are driven by immoderate loves, or by uncontrolled anger, or by excessive sadness, suffer no less than those who are vexed bodily by demons. For it is reported in some histories that some people fell into madness from love, others from anger, not a few from sadness or from excessive joy; which I think happens because these opposing powers, that is, demons, having been given a place in their minds, which intemperance had first opened, took full possession of their senses, especially when no glory of virtue had roused them to resist.

Notes and citation

Summary: Many sins arise from natural bodily motions such as hunger and desire; the hostile powers then inflame these beyond measure, at times even to madness.

  • The section on sexual desire treats it as natural, like hunger, not as caused by the devil.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes and references printed inside the text; Migne's marginal Scripture references): Epltes. vt, il, Matth. tv. ἰδ Joan. xm. → ; lCor. ιι. Vide lib. 0rigenian., q. 7, nttm. et M. (‘28) Sic _IIISS. Alias, substiterintus.) Infra mss, ἰ deinde augescente vitio. lu libb. editis deest, deinde. b (9.9) Virtutibtts._ Deest in antea editis, sed hac etur tu mss. → .

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.2 (PG 11:305a–307a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.3PG 11:307a–308b

Quod autem sint quzcdam peccata quo: non a contrariis virtutibus veniant, sed ex naturalibus corporis motibus initium sumant, manifestissime declarat apostolus Paulus in co dum dicit: σ Caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, spiritus autem adversus carnem ; bzec sunt quae sibi invicem resistunt ut non quae vultis illa faciatis . Si ergo caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem, est nobis aliquando colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem, id est cum homines sumus , et secundum carnem ambulamus, etcum non possumus tentari in majoribus tentationibus quam Ehumanis, cum dicitur de nobis: Tentatio vos non comprehendat nisi humana. Fidelis autem Deus qui non permittet vos tentarilsupra id quod potestis -. Sicut enim hi qui agonibus prmsunt, eos qui adcertamen veniunt, non utcunque, neque fortuito inter se sinunt inire certamina, sed diligenti examinatione prout vel corpora viderint, vel aetates, aequissima comparationeiungentes illum cum illo, verbi gratia, pueros cum pueris, viros cum viris, qui sibi vel aevi vel roboris propinquitate conveniant; ita intelligendum est etiam de divina providentia, quod omnes qui in bos humanaevitze descenderint agones, α justissima moderatione dispenset secundum rationem uniuscujusque virtutis, quam ipse solus, qui solus corda hominum intuetur, agnoscit ;ut alius quidem pugnet adversus carnem talem, alius vero adversus talem (5‘2), et alius quidem in tantum tempus, alius vero in tantum, et ut alter instigetur carne in hoc vel illttd, alius vero in aliud; tum vero ut alius resistat adversus inimicam potestatem illam vel illam, alius vero adversus duas vel tres simul, aut nunc quidem adversus aliam, nunc iterum adversus aliam, et certo tempore quodam adversus illam, et certo quodam adversus aliam, vel post quae gesta adversus quas pugnet, postque: vero adversus alias.!ntuere enim, ne forte tale aliquid indicetur per hoc quod dicit Apostolus: Fidelis autem Deus qui non patietur vos tentari supra id quod potestis, id est, pro eo quod singuli pro virtutis suae quantitate vel possibilitate temptantur. Nec tamen quoniam diximus iusto dei iudicio unumquemque pro virtutis suae quantitate temptari, idcirco putandum est quia omni genere debeat vincere qui tentatur; sicut ille quidem qui in agone contendit, quamvis atque moderatione comparatus sit} adversario, non tamen omni genere vincere powrit. Verum nisi mqualis fuerit concertantium virtus, non erit justa palma vincentis, nec juste culpabitur vict-us, propterea quod permittit quidem nos tentari, non tamen supra id quod possumus; pro viribus enim nostris tentantur; nec tamen scriptum est. quia faciet in tentatione etiam exitum sustinendi, sed exitum, ut sustinere possimus. id est: ipse praestat, ut sustinere possimus. Ut vero hoc quo posse nobis ipse dedit vel strenue, vel segniter impleamus, in nobis est. Dubium enim non est quod in omni tentatione adest nobis tolerandi virtus, si tamen nos competenter utamur virtute concessa. Non enim idem esthabere vincendi virtutem, et vincere, sicut ipse Apostolus cautissimo sermone signavit dicens, quia Dabit Deus exitum ut sustinere possitis, non, ut sustinentis. Multi enim non sustinent, sed in tentatione vincuntur. A Deo autem datur, non ut sustineamus: alioquin nullum jam videretur esse certamen; sed ut sustinere possimus. Ea autem virtute quae nobis data est ut vincere possimus, secundum liberi arbitrii facultatem aut industrie utimur, et vincimus; aut segniter, et superamur. Si enim totum nobis hoc detur ut omni genere superemus, et nullo modo vincamur, quae jam superest, causa certandi ei qui vinci non potest? Aut quod palma: meritum, ubi repugnandi adimitur vincendique facultas? Si vero atque quidem omnibus nobis vincendi possibilitas prebeatur, in nostra autem positum sit potestate, quomodo hac possibilitate uti debeamus, id est vel industrie, vel segniter, justa eritvel victi culpa, vel palma victoris. igitur ex his quae pro viribus nostris disputata sunt, arbitror quod evidenter apparuit, esse quaedam delicta quae nequaquam malignis virtutibus perurgentibus committamus, alia‘vero esse quibus instinctu earum ad nimietatem quamdam immoderationemque provocemur. Unde consequens est nunc inquirere quomodo ipsa) contrariae virtutes haec ipsa incitamenta operentur in nobis. ι.

That there are some sins which do not come from the opposing powers but take their beginning from the natural motions of the body, the apostle Paul declares most plainly where he says: "The flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; these resist each other, so that you do not do the things you wish." If, then, the flesh lusts against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh, we have at times a struggle against flesh and blood, that is, when we are merely human and walk according to the flesh, and when we cannot be tempted with greater temptations than human ones, as is said of us: "Let no temptation take hold of you but what is human. But God is faithful, who will not let you be tempted beyond what you are able." For as those who preside over the games do not let those who come to the contest engage each other at random or by chance, but with careful examination of their bodies or ages match them with the fairest pairing, this one with that, for example boys with boys and men with men, who are close to one another in age or strength; so we must understand of divine providence too, that it disposes with the most just moderation all who descend into these contests of human life, according to the strength of each, which he alone knows who alone sees the hearts of men: so that one fights against such flesh and another against such, one for so long a time and another for so long, and one is incited by the flesh to this or that, another to something else; and so that one resists this or that hostile power, another two or three at once, or now one and now another, at a certain time this one and at another time that one, or after certain deeds against some and after others against others. Consider whether something of this kind is not indicated by what the apostle says, "God is faithful, who will not let you be tempted beyond what you are able," that is, because each is tempted in proportion to the amount or capacity of his strength. Yet because we have said that by the just judgment of God each one is tempted in proportion to the amount of his strength, it must not therefore be thought that the one who is tempted must conquer in every way; just as the one who strives in the games, although he has been matched with his opponent with fair equality and moderation, cannot always conquer. But unless the strength of the contestants is equal, the victor's palm will not be just, nor will the loser be justly blamed. Therefore God allows us to be tempted, but not beyond what we are able; for we are tempted according to our strength. Nor is it written that he will make with the temptation a way out of enduring, but a way out, that we may be able to endure; that is, he himself grants that we may be able to endure. But whether we fulfil vigorously or idly this ability he has given us is up to us. For there is no doubt that in every temptation the strength to bear it is present to us, if only we use the strength granted us properly. For to have the strength to conquer is not the same as to conquer, as the apostle himself indicated with very careful wording, saying that "God will give a way out, that you may be able to endure," not "that you will endure." For many do not endure but are overcome in temptation. What is given by God is not that we endure, otherwise there would seem to be no contest at all, but that we may be able to endure. And the strength that is given us so that we may be able to conquer we use, according to the faculty of free choice, either diligently, and we conquer, or idly, and we are overcome. For if this were given us entirely, that we should prevail in every way and never be overcome, what reason for contending would remain for one who cannot be overcome? Or what merit is there in the palm, where the faculty of resisting and of conquering is taken away? But if the possibility of conquering is offered equally to all of us, and it is placed in our power how we are to use this possibility, that is, diligently or idly, then the fault of the vanquished and the palm of the victor will be just. From the things we have discussed as well as we could, I think it has clearly appeared that there are some offences that we commit without malign powers pressing us, and others to which we are provoked by their instigation to a certain excess and lack of measure. Hence it follows that we must now inquire how these opposing powers work these incitements in us.

Gal 5:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:13 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some sins arise from the flesh warring against the spirit; God, like a just president of the games, lets each be tempted only according to his strength, while the use of that strength is in our power.

  • Sources: Gal 5:17; 1 Cor 10:13.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.3 (PG 11:307a–308b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.4PG 11:308b–310b

Cogitationes quae de corde nostro procedunt, vel memoria quorumcunque gestorum, vel quarumlibet rerum causarumque contemplatio, invenimus quod aliquoties ex nobis ipsis procedant, aliquoties a contrariis virtutibus concitentur ('58); interdum etiam a Deo, vel a sanctis angelisimmittantur. Verum lure ita esse fabulosum fortasse videbitur, nisi Scriptura: divinae testimoniis fuerit comprobatum. Quod ergo cogitatio oriatur ex nobis, David testatur in Psalmis dicens: α Quia cogitatio hominis confitebitur tibi. et reliquiae cogitationis diem festum agent tibi θ’. Quod autem et a convtrariis virtutibus fieri soleat, Salomon in Ecclesiaste testatur hoc modo: α Si spiritus potestatem habentis ascenderit super te, locum tuum ne dimittas; quoniam sanitas compescit peccata multa . Et Paulus apostolus de iisdem testimonium dabit, dicens: t Cogitationes destruentes, et omnem elationem quae se extollit adversus scientiam Christi ".iEx Deo autem quod iiat, David nihilominus testatur in Psalmis dicens: ά Beatus vir cujus est susceptio apud te, Domine, ascensus in corde cjus .» Et Apostolus dicit,quoniam Deus dedit in corde Titi ". Quod vero etiam per angelos vel bonos, vel malos aliqua humanis cordibus suggerantur. designat vel Tobiam angelus comitatus vel propheta: Sermo dicentis: ε Et reSpondit angelus qui loquebatur in me ’5; sed et Pastoris liber haec eadem declarat dicens quod bini angeli singulos quosque hominum comitentur; ζει si quando bonae cogitationes cor nostrum ascenderint, a bono angelo suggcri dicit; si vero contrariae, mali angeli dicit esse instincmm. Eadem quoque Barnabas in Epistula sua declarat, cum duas vias esse dicit, unam lucis, alteram tenebrarum, quibus et praeesse certos quosque angelos dicit: vim quidem lucis, angelos Dei; tenebrarum autem viae, angelos Sataute. Nihil tamen aliud putandum est accidere nobis es ipsis quae cordi nostro suggeruntur bonis vel malis, nisi commotionem solam et incitamentum provocans nos vel ad bona vel. ad mala. Possibile autem nobis est cum maligna virtus nos ceperit ad malum incitare}, abjicere a nobis pravas suggestiones, et resistere suasionibus pessimis, et nihil prorsus culpabiliter gerere. 141 Et rursum possibile est ut cum nos divina virtus ad meliora provocaverit, non sequamur, liberi arbitrii potestate in utraque nobis servata. bicebamus sane in superioribus, quod etiam memoria: nobis quaedam vel bonorum vel malorum suggerantur, sive per divinam providentiam sive per virtutes contrarias; sicut ostenditur in libro Hester, cum beneficia iustissimi viri Mardochaei Artaxerxes non meminisset et nocturnis vigiliis fatigatus a deo in memoriam recepisset rerum gestarum monumenta chartis mandata requirere; in quibus de beneficiis Mardochaei ammonitus inimicum quidem eius Aman suspendi iuberet, ipsi honores magnificos, universa: autem sanctorum genti salutem periculo jam imminente conterret. Per contrariam vero diaboli virtutem memoria: pontificum et scribarum putandum est suggestum illud quod venientes ad Pilatum dixerunt: Domine, recordati sutnus quomodo seductor ille dixit, dum adhuc viveret,quia, Post tertiam diem resurgam ". Sed et ludas quod de proditione Domini Salvatoris cogitavit, non fuit a sola mentis ejus malitia veniens. Testata est enim Scriptura, quia diabolus jam misisset itt cor ejus ut traderet eum θ’. Propter quod et Salomon recte przecepit, dicens: ε Cum diligentia serva tuutn cor . Et Paulus apostolus ait : Amplius debemus intendere his quae audivimus, ne forte ellluamus”. Et cumdicit : Nolite locum dare diabolo‘, sosteudens per hoc, quia certo opere, vel certa quadam desidia animi locus diabolo datur, ut si semel ingressus fuerit cor nostrum, aut obtineat nos, aut certe vel polluat animam, si non penitus obtinere potuerit. cum ignita sua jacula jactat in nos; quibus aliquando quidem in. altum descendente vulnere sauciamur, aliquando vero tantummodo inflammamur. Raro certe et paucis quibusdam haec ejus ignita jacula restinguuntur, ita ut locum vulneris non inveniant, id est, cum quis munitissimo et validissimo scuto lidei fuerit obtectus. Quod vero dictum est in Epistula ad Ephesios: Quia non est nobis colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem, sed adversus principatus et potestates, adθ. versus mundi hujus rectores tenebrarum harum, adversus spiritalia nequitiae in ctelestibus‘: ita oportebit intelligi quod dixit, ‹ nobis; id est, mihi Paulo, et vobis Ephesiis, et quibuscunque non est colluctatio cum carne et sanguine. His etenim certamen est adversus principatus et potestates, adversus tnundi hujus rectores tenebrarum, non sicut erat Corinthiis, quibus certamen adhuc adversus carnem et. sanguinem erat, quos tentatio non apprehenderat nisi humana.

The thoughts that proceed from our heart, or the memory of any deeds whatever, or the contemplation of any things and causes, we find sometimes proceed from ourselves, sometimes are stirred up by opposing powers, and at times are also sent in by God or by holy angels. But this may perhaps seem fabulous unless it is proved by the testimonies of divine Scripture. That thought arises from ourselves, David testifies in the Psalms, saying: "For the thought of man shall confess to you, and the remnants of thought shall keep festival to you." That it is also usually done by opposing powers, Solomon testifies in Ecclesiastes thus: "If the spirit of one who has power rises up against you, do not leave your place; for healing will check many sins." And the apostle Paul will give testimony of the same, saying: "Destroying thoughts and every height that exalts itself against the knowledge of Christ." That it happens from God, David likewise testifies in the Psalms, saying: "Blessed is the man whose help is from you, O Lord; ascents are in his heart." And the apostle says that God put it in the heart of Titus. That some things are suggested to human hearts through angels, whether good or evil, is shown both by the angel who accompanied Tobias and by the word of the prophet who says, "And the angel who spoke in me answered." The book of the Shepherd also declares the same, saying that two angels accompany each human being, and that if good thoughts arise in our heart they are suggested by the good angel, but if contrary ones, they are the instigation of the evil angel. Barnabas declares the same in his epistle, when he says there are two ways, one of light and the other of darkness, over which, he says, certain angels preside: over the way of light, the angels of God; over the way of darkness, the angels of Satan. Yet we must think that nothing else happens to us from the things suggested to our heart, good or evil, except only a movement and incitement provoking us either to good or to evil. It is possible for us, when a malign power has begun to incite us to evil, to cast the depraved suggestions away from us and to resist the worst persuasions and to do nothing at all that is blameworthy. And again it is possible that, when a divine power has called us to better things, we do not follow, the power of free choice being preserved to us in both cases. We said above that certain memories of good or evil things are also suggested to us, whether by divine providence or by the opposing powers; as is shown in the book of Esther, when Artaxerxes had not remembered the services of that most just man Mordecai, and, wearied by sleepless nights, was brought by God to remember to ask for the records of past events committed to writing; and, reminded in them of Mordecai's services, he ordered his enemy Haman to be hanged, and conferred on Mordecai himself magnificent honours, and on the whole nation of the saints salvation when danger was already imminent. But by the contrary power of the devil we must think it was suggested to the memory of the chief priests and scribes when they came to Pilate and said, "Lord, we remember how that deceiver said while he was still alive, After three days I will rise." And what Judas thought about the betrayal of the Lord and Saviour did not come from the malice of his own mind alone; for Scripture testifies that the devil had already put it into his heart to betray him. Therefore Solomon rightly commanded, saying, "Keep your heart with all diligence"; and the apostle Paul says, "We ought to give the more earnest heed to what we have heard, lest perhaps we drift away"; and when he says, "Do not give place to the devil," he shows by this that by a certain deed, or by a certain sloth of mind, place is given to the devil, so that once he has entered our heart he either takes possession of us or at least pollutes the soul, if he cannot wholly possess it, when he hurls his fiery darts at us; by these we are sometimes wounded, the wound going deep, and sometimes only set on fire. Rarely indeed, and in a few people, are these fiery darts of his quenched so that they find no place to wound, that is, when someone is covered with the strongest and most powerful shield of faith. But what is said in the Epistle to the Ephesians, "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places," must be understood thus: "our" means mine, Paul's, and yours, the Ephesians', and of all whose struggle is not with flesh and blood. For these have a contest against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world; not as it was for the Corinthians, whose contest was still against flesh and blood, and whom no temptation had seized but what was human.

Ps 76:10 (75:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 10:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 10:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 84:5 (83:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 8:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Zech 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Esth 6:1–11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 27:63 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Prov 4:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Esth 6:1 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Thoughts arise from ourselves, from hostile powers, or from God and the angels, as Scripture, Hermas and Barnabas attest; but in every case we remain free to accept or reject them.

  • Sources: Ps 76:10 (75:11 LXX); Eccl 10:4; 2 Cor 10:5; Ps 84:5 (83:6 LXX); 2 Cor 8:16; Tob 5; Zech 1:14; Hermas, Mandate 6.2; Barn. 18.1; Matt 27:63; John 13:2; Prov 4:23; Heb 2:1; Eph 4:27; Eph 6:16, 12.
  • The memory sent by God is the story of Mordecai in Esther 6, the king's sleepless night and his remembrance of Mordecai.
  • Hermas and Barnabas are cited as authorities alongside Scripture; Origen counted the Shepherd as inspired.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Extrabiblical texts: Tob 5 (Tobit [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion); Herm. Mand. 6.2 (Shepherd of Hermas: Mandates; allusion); Barn. 18.1 (Epistle of Barnabas; allusion)

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.4 (PG 11:308b–310b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.5PG 11:310b–312a

Nec tamen putandum est quod singuli quique ν adversus omnia haec decertent. lmpossibile enim id esse arbitror ulli hominum, quamvis ille sit sanctus, ιιι adversus omnia haec simul possit habere certamen. Quod si ullo modo id accidat, quod certe tieri non potest, impossibile est ut id prorsus ferre possit humana natura sine maxima subversione sui; sed sicut, verbi gratia, quinquaginta aliqui milites si dicant sibi imminere cer- quinquaginta, non ita intelta mea adversus alios ligendum est, quod unus ex illis adversus quinquaginta dimicaturus sit, sed recte dicit unusquisque illorum, quia certamen nobis est adversum quinquaginta , omnibus tamen adversum omnes; ita etiam hoc audiendum est quod Apostolus dicit, quod universis athletis et militibus Christi colluctatio et certamen est adversus omnia ista qua: enumerata sunt; omnibus, singulis tamen, vel cum singulis futuro certamine, vel certe prout prohatum fuerit ab agonis ipsius justo prmside Deo. Arbitror namque quia certa mensura sit humanae natura: etsi Paulus ille sit de quo dicitur: Vas electionis est mihi iste‘; aut Petrus adversus quem portze interi non praevalent, aut si Moyses ille sit amicus Dei, quOrum nullus prorsus nnurcm simul adversariarum virtutmn catervam posset sine [sui aliqua pernicie tolerare, nisi forte illius solius virtus operetur in eo qui dixit: Contidite, ego vici mundmn‘. Propter quem conti. denter etiam Paulus dicebat: Omnia possum in eo qui me confortat Christus . Et iterum : Amplius autem (l5) quam omnes illi laboravi, non autem ego, sed gratia Dei mecum . › Propter hanc ergo virtutem qum utique hmnana non est, operantem et loquentem in se, Paulus dicebat : Certus sum autem quia neque mors, neque vita, neque angeli, neque principatus, neque potestates, neque prmsentia , neque futura, neque altitudo, neque profundum, neque virtus, neque alia ulla creatura ο poterit nos separare a charitate Dei, quae est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro ". Sola enim per se luuuana natura non arbitror quia possit adversus angelos, et excelsa et profunda, et aliam creaturam habere certamen; sed cum senserit praesentem in se Dominum et inhabitantem, conlidentia divini adjutorii dicet: Dominus illuminatio mea et Salvator meus, quem timebo? Dominus protector vitae meat, a quo trepidabo? Dum appropiant super me nocentes ut edant carnes meas, qui tribulaut me inimici mei, ipsi infirmati sunt et ceciderunt. Si consistant adversum me castra, non timebit cor nicum; si exsurgat adversum me praelium, in hoc ego sperabo ‘. Unde ego arbitror quod numquam fortassis homo per se ipsum virtutem contrariam vincere potest, nisi usus fuerit adiutorio divino. Unde et angelus dicitur »luctatus esse« cum Iacob. Quod nos quidem ita intellegimus quia non idem sit luctatum esse cum Iacob angelum, quod est adversum Iacob; sed is quidem, qui ei salutis ipsius causa aderat, qui et cognitis profectibus ejus, etiam nomen ei lsrael dedit, iste cum ipso luctatur; id est, cum ipso est in agone, et juvateum in certamine; cum sine dubio alius esset adversus quem dimicaret, et adversus quem ei certamen ageretur. Denique Paulus non dixit nobis esse luctamen cum principibus, vel cum p0testatibus, sed adversus principatus et potestates ι’. Unde etsi Jacob luctatus est, sine dubio adversus aliquam harum virtutum luctatus est, quas humano generi, et sanctis praecipue adversari et movere certamina Paulus enuntiat. Ideo denique dicitde eo Scriptura , quia luctatus est cum angelo, et invaluit ad Deum “; ιιι sit agouis quidem certamen angeli adjutorio sustentatum, perfectionis vero palma vincentem perducat ad Deum.

Yet we must not think that each individual contends against all these. For I think it impossible for any human being, however holy he may be, to be able to wage a contest against all these at once. And if this should somehow happen, which certainly cannot be, it is impossible that human nature could bear it at all without its utter overthrow. But just as, for example, if some fifty soldiers say that a battle with fifty others is imminent for them, it is not to be understood that one of them is to fight against fifty, but each of them rightly says, "We have a battle against fifty," all of them, however, against all; so too we must hear what the apostle says, that all the athletes and soldiers of Christ have a struggle and a contest against all these things that have been listed: all of them, but each singly, either in a contest to come with single opponents, or at least as shall have been approved by God, the just president of the contest himself. For I think there is a certain measure to human nature, even if it is Paul, of whom it is said, "This man is a chosen vessel to me," or Peter, against whom the gates of hell do not prevail, or Moses, the friend of God; none of whom could at all endure the whole troop of opposing powers at once without some ruin to himself, unless perhaps the power of him alone were at work in him who said, "Take courage, I have overcome the world." Because of him Paul too said confidently, "I can do all things in Christ who strengthens me"; and again, "I laboured more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me." Because of this power, then, which is certainly not human, working and speaking in him, Paul said: "But I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor power, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." For I do not think that human nature alone by itself can wage a contest against angels, and heights and depths, and any other creature; but when it has felt the Lord present and dwelling in it, it will say in confidence of divine help: "The Lord is my light and my Saviour; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the protector of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? When evildoers draw near against me to eat my flesh, my enemies who afflict me, they themselves are weakened and have fallen. If an army should encamp against me, my heart shall not fear; if war should rise against me, in this will I hope." Hence I think that a human being can perhaps never overcome an opposing power by himself unless he has made use of divine help. Hence the angel too is said to have “wrestled” with Jacob. We understand this to mean that it is not the same for the angel to have wrestled with Jacob as against Jacob; rather, the one who was present to him for the sake of his salvation, and who, when he knew his progress, also gave him the name Israel, wrestles with him, that is, is with him in the contest and helps him in the fight; while without doubt there was another against whom he fought and against whom his contest was waged. Indeed Paul did not say that our wrestling is with principalities or with powers, but against principalities and powers. Hence, even if Jacob wrestled, he without doubt wrestled against one of those powers which Paul declares oppose the human race, and especially the saints, and stir up contests. That is why Scripture says of him that he wrestled with an angel and prevailed with God; so that the struggle of the contest was sustained by the help of an angel, while the palm of perfection brings the victor to God.

Acts 9:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 33:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 16:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:38–39 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 27:1–3 (26:1-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 32:24–28 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 32:24 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: No one fights all the hostile powers at once; God, the just umpire, measures each contest, and the saints prevail only by Christ's power, as Jacob's wrestling shows.

  • Sources: Acts 9:15; Matt 16:18; Exod 33:11 (Moses the friend of God); John 16:33; Phil 4:13; 1 Cor 15:10; Rom 8:38–39; Ps 27:1–3 (26:1–3 LXX); Eph 6:12; Gen 32:24–28 (Jacob wrestling).
  • Origen here takes the one who wrestled with Jacob as a helping angel and supposes a hostile power against which Jacob strove.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.5 (PG 11:310b–312a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.6PG 11:312b–313a

Nec sane arbitrandum cst quia hujusmodi certamina corporum robore et palaestrica: artis exercitiis peraguntur, sed spiritui adversus spiritum pugna est, similiter ut Paulus designat adversus principatus, et potestates, et mundi tutius rectores tenebrarum nobis. imminere certamen. Ipsa vero certaminum species ita intelligenda est, cum danma , cum pericula, cum opprobria, cum criminationes excitantur adversum nos, neu id agentibus adversis potestatibus ιιι haec tantununodo patiamur, sed ut per lucc vel ad iram multam, vel ad tristitiam nimiam, vel ad desperationem ultimam provocemur; vel certe quod est gravius, conqueri adversus Deum tatigati et. victi taediis con'tpellamur, tauquam humanam vitam non asque justeque moderantem; ut per hoc infirmemurin lide, vel decidamus ab spe, vel transterri cogamur a veritate dogmatum , et impium aliquid de Deo sentire persuadeamur. Talia namque quaedam scripta sunt de Joh, cmn diabolus dari sibi facultatem bonorum ejus poposcisset a Deo. Per quod etiam illud educentur, quod non fortuitis aliquibus incursionibus impugnemur, si quando nos talia aliqua facultatum damna percusserint, neque quod fortuito nostrorum aliquis captivus abducitur, vel domorum ruina: in quibus chari quique opprimantur, eveniunt; in quibus onmibus unusquisque fidelium dicere debet, quia Νοη haberes adversum me potestatem, nisi esset data tibi desuper . Vide enim quia non cecidisset domus Job supra (ilius ejus nisi prius adversus eos diabolus accepisset potestatem; neque equites ternis ordinibus irruissent, ut raperent camelos ejus, vel boves ceteraque animalia, nisi instincti ab eo spiritu, cui se ministros ex propositi sui oboedientia mancipaverant. Sed ne ille quidem qui videbatur vel ignis,vel quod putatum est fulmen, cecidisset super Ores Joh, antequam diabolus diceret ad Deum: «Nonne tu communisti omnia quae foris sunt, et ejus reliqua? Sed nunc immitte maumn tuam, et continge omnia quae habet, nisi in faciem benedixerit tibi ”.

Nor must we suppose that such contests are carried on by bodily strength and the exercises of the wrestling school; rather, the fight is of spirit against spirit, just as Paul indicates that our contest is against principalities and powers and the rulers of the darkness of this world. The very form of these contests must be understood thus: when losses, when dangers, when insults, when accusations are stirred up against us, the hostile powers do not aim at this, that we should merely suffer these things, but that through them we should be provoked either to great anger, or to excessive sadness, or to utter despair; or, what is worse, that, worn out and overcome by weariness, we should be driven to complain against God, as if he did not govern human life fairly and justly; so that through this we may be weakened in faith, or fall away from hope, or be compelled to abandon the truth of the doctrines and be persuaded to think something impious about God. For some such things are written about Job, when the devil asked God to be given power over his goods. Through this we are also taught that we are not assailed by chance attacks when such losses of property strike us, and that it is not by chance that one of our family is led away captive, or that the collapse of houses in which our dear ones are crushed happens. In all these each of the faithful ought to say, "You would have no power against me, unless it had been given you from above." For see that the house of Job would not have fallen upon his sons unless the devil had first received power against them; nor would the horsemen have rushed in three companies to carry off his camels or oxen and other animals, had they not been driven by that spirit to which they had bound themselves as servants by the obedience of their own purpose; nor would that which seemed to be fire, or what was thought to be lightning, have fallen on Job's sheep, before the devil said to God: "Have you not fenced around all that is his, outside and within? But now put forth your hand and touch all that he has, and see if he does not bless you to your face."

Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Job 1:9–19 (allusion, high confidence) · John 19:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 1:10–11 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The demons' warfare is spiritual: misfortunes like Job's are allowed by God and aim to drive us to anger, despair or complaint against God.

  • Sources: Eph 6:12; Job 1:9–19; John 19:11. 'Bless you to your face' renders Origen's Latin literally; the Hebrew and Greek use 'bless' as a euphemism for 'curse'.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Topics: Ethics, Persecution

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.6 (PG 11:312b–313a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.2.7PG 11:313a

Ex quibus erunibus illtul ostenditur, quod mnuia haec quae Iittnt in hoc mundo, quzc media existimantur, sive illa tristia sint,sive quoquomodo sint, non quidem a Deo fiunt. nec tamen sine Deo; dum niaiignas et contrarias virtutes talia volentes operari non solum non prohibet Deus, sed et permittit facere haec, sed certis quibusque temporibus et personis; sicut et in ipso Job dicitur, quia ad certum tempus paratus est cadere suh aliis. ct domus ipsius dcprredari ab iniquis. Propterea docet nos Scriptura divina oumia quae accidunt nobis tauquam a Deo illata suscipere, scientes quod sine Deo nihil fit. Quod autem hzec ita sint, id est, quod sine Deo nihil liat, quomodo possumus dubitare, Domitio et Salvatore pronuntiante et iliccute: Nonne duo passeres asse vanieunt, et unus rt ipsis non cadet super terram sine Patre vestro qui in caelis est"?t Sed necessitas nos traxit paulo amplius evagari de colluctatione adversarmu virtutum, quam adversus homines gerunt, dison tantes et de his qum humano generi accidunt tristioribus, id est tentationibus vita: hujus, sicut ait Job: Nonne tentatio est omnis vita hominis super terram ? ut manifestius quomodo inec accidant, ο et quam pie de his sentiri debeat, panderetur. Itane videamus quomodo homines etiam in peccatum talsze scientia: dilabuntur. vel quo prospectu virtutes contraria; etiam de his pugnas adversum nos soleant commovere.

From all these it is shown that all the things that happen in this world which are reckoned indifferent, whether they are sad or of whatever kind, are not done by God, and yet not without God; for God not only does not prevent the malign and opposing powers that wish to work such things, but even permits them to do them, though only at certain times and to certain persons; as is said of Job himself, that for a certain time he was appointed to fall under others, and his house to be plundered by the wicked. Therefore divine Scripture teaches us to receive all things that happen to us as brought on us by God, knowing that nothing happens without God. And that this is so, that is, that nothing happens without God, how can we doubt, when the Lord and Saviour declares and says: "Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? And not one of them will fall to the ground without your Father who is in heaven"? But necessity has drawn us to wander a little further in discussing the struggle of the opposing powers which they wage against human beings, and the sadder things that befall the human race, that is, the trials of this life, as Job says, "Is not the whole life of man on earth a trial?", so that it might be set out more clearly how these things happen and how piously we ought to think about them. Now let us see how people also slip into the sin of false knowledge, or with what aim the opposing powers are accustomed to stir up battles against us concerning these things as well.

Matt 10:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 7:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 12:5 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Misfortunes happen not by God's doing yet not without him, since he permits the hostile powers within limits; next Origen turns to false knowledge.

  • Sources: Matt 10:29; Job 7:1 (LXX πειρατήριον, 'a trial'). The phrase about Job being 'appointed to fall under others' paraphrases Job 12:5 in the Greek version.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.2.7 (PG 11:313a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-24/#p-3-2-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-2-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).