Homilies on Ezekiel 11.1–11.5

Latin text: Migne, PG 13 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 13 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 11

11.1PG 13:745b–746a

Exercitatio corporum, et in totum fortitudinem comparat iis qui exercentur, et per partes unumquodque membrum sensusque membrorum vegetiores εει· cit ad suflcrendum quid, autad sentiendum : ut puta oculorum acies, si exet-citetur in visu, acutior fiat ad videndum ; aures, si frequentius audiant, melius posv sunt vocum capere dissonantias. Hoc autem et in ca:teris membris licet deprehendere, quodin paucis ostendimus. Vcrum quid mihi prodest ad beatitudinem et ad vitam sempiternam, si corpus exercitationibus roboretur? Quod mibi est emolumentum, etiamsi fortissime corpore fiam, etiamsi omnibus membris vegetus incedam? Eeontrario autem si sensus animae habuero exercitatos ad sentiendum quid, ad discendum dies noctesque contrivero, non solum in hac vita mihi conducit, sed etiam recedentem de corpore prosequetur. Idcirco in parabolis et in mnigmatibus loctatus est Deus , ut extenderet se mens nostra. νει potius in unum colligens dictorum intueatur acumina, et a corporis vitiis recedens, dum intelligit veritatem, vitae suae cursum secundum eumdem dirigat. llaec in prooemio diximus, quia sermo Dei factus est ad Ezechielem dicens : Fili hominis, narra narrationem, et dic parabolam ad domum Israel. Pro hoc autem quod Septuaginta interpretes posuerunt narrationem , alius de interpretibus transtulit, propone problema ; alius, profer problema; alius, significa (enigma. Igitur et problema et muigma etparabola est quod lectum est. Si quando illuminatione indiguimus scientiae Dei, nunc vel maxime et necessarie indigemus, ut non tam ego quam orantibus vobis gratia Dei in me edisserat solutionem problematis et a‘nigmatis, sive parabolae.

Exercise of the body both gives strength as a whole to those who are trained and, part by part, makes each member and the senses of the members more vigorous for enduring something or for perceiving: for instance, the keenness of the eyes, if it is exercised in seeing, becomes sharper for seeing; and the ears, if they hear more often, can better catch the differences of sounds. This can be observed in the other members too, as we have shown in a few. But what does it profit me for blessedness and for eternal life if the body is strengthened by exercises? What gain is it to me even if I become very strong in body, even if I go about vigorous in all my members? But, on the contrary, if I have the senses of the soul exercised for perceiving, if I have spent days and nights in learning, it not only benefits me in this life but will also go with me when I depart from the body. That is why God has spoken in parables and riddles: so that our mind might stretch itself, or rather, gathering itself together, might look into the subtleties of what is said, and, withdrawing from the vices of the body while it understands the truth, might direct the course of its life according to that truth. We have said these things by way of preface because the word of God came to Ezekiel, saying: “Son of man, tell a tale and speak a parable to the house of Israel.” Instead of what the Seventy translators put, “tale,” another of the translators rendered “propose a problem,” another “bring forth a problem,” another “signify a riddle.” So what has been read is a problem, a riddle, and a parable. If ever we have needed the illumination of the knowledge of God, we need it now most of all, so that, through your prayers, not so much I as the grace of God in me may set out the solution of the problem and riddle, or parable.

Ezek 17:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 5:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Prov 1:6 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: As exercise strengthens the body, the study of Scripture’s riddles trains the soul for eternal life; Ezekiel’s parable of the eagles is such a riddle.

  • Quotations: Ezek 17:2 (the Septuagint’s “tale” compared with the renderings of the other Greek versions); cf. Heb 5:14; Prov 1:6. Scan debris is removed by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked column number joined to a word; leaked marginal reference and running head; joined words): 3951gitur → Igitur; '° Ezecb. PATROL. Gn. Xlll. necessarieindigemusmt → necessarie indigemus, ut.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Ezech. 11.1 (PG 13:745b–746a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-ezechielem/11-1/#p-11-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-ezechielem-11-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin in the Migne PG 13 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged; badly garbled passages and gaps supplied from Baehrens, GCS 33, and noted); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.

11.2PG 13:746a–748d

Quae est ergo parabola aquila: quam in prasenti Spiritus sanctus ostendit? Quae non solum aquila, sed etiam comparatione exterarum aquilarum magna aquila , et ingentium alarum, et longa extensa, et plena unguibus, sive, ut quidam interpretatus est, plena plumis scribitur. Non solum his quae diximus major est caeteris aquilis, verum in eo vel praecipua est, quod ductum habet intrandi in Libanum. Nam ingrediens illic ab arbore cedri qua: in Libano sita erat electa , teneritudines et summa qumque decerpsit, et attulit in terram Chanaan, in civitatem sive negotiatorum , sive negotiatricem , Si“ U'ansliiwrum, Sive certe, interpretati sunt, muratam ;et posuit hoc quod de cedro Libani sumpserat, ut plantareturet cresceret in terram Chanaan. Post haec eadem aquila de semine terrae, unde sumpserat summitates cedri, extrinse. cus sibi semen accepit, et plantavit illud in campo frondifero super aquam multam. Hoc autem ipsum quod de terra Chanaan fuerat assumptum ab ea quae Libani summa quaeque decerpserat, idest, quod secunda vice acceperat, factum est in vitem non furtem, sed infirmam, verum etiam statura pusillam ; et palmites hujus vitis iutirnue reclinati sunt, pro eo quod de Libano et cedro fuerat assumptum, in tantum ut radices suas sub ipsius trunco consitas haberet. Et quidem facta est vitis, et fecit propagines, et extendit arbusta sua. Et post hzec venit alia aquila, et ipsa magna, magnis alis et copiosis vel plumis sive unguibus; ct ecce ista vitis de qua nunc diximus, veniente secunda aquila, declinavit testamentum suum ad eam, spernens id testamentum quod prius cum arbore feeerat,iu qua reclinata vitis fuerat eflecta , et propaginibus factis arbusta latius fuderat, et complexa est secundam aquilam, et radices suas a priore transtulit ad sequentem. Deinde palmites emisit ad aquilam secundam, ut irrigaret eam cum gleba plantationis ejus in campo bono et aqua multa. Et quidem irrigata est hate ipsa vitis, et translata ad aquilam secundam, ut faceret incrcmcnta, ut all‘erret fructum , ut fieret in vitem magnam. Idcirco propheta: imperatur ut dicat, quia testamentum transgrediens vitis quod fecerat cum aquila priore, et statuens illud cum secunda,non dirigatur, neque radices teneritudinis ejus cillerent; quin potius fructus ejus propter transcensionem ejus putreant, et arescant omnia quae de ea oriebantur, et jam ultra non habeat brachium magnum et populum multum; evellatur autem radicitus, et licet irrigata sit, tamen non perseveret, etnon dirigatur in ubertatem ; statimque ut contigerit eam ventus urens, arescat, et eum gleba plantationis suae siccetur. Hoc propositio ipsius historiae exposcit, ut quae obscurius dicta sunt, qui-l busdam adjunctis sermonibus planius enarremus. lat si tantus labor est, ut ipsum quod dicitur intel- Iigatur, quid necesse est dicere ipsam quaestionem quantam habeat obscuritatem, quae sit aquila prior, quid sit Libanus, quae cedrus, auze summa cedri , quae aquila secunda, quae translatio vitis a priore ad sequentem? Si aliquando Dei indiguimus auxilio (semper autem in intellectu Scripturarum Spiritu ’ - sancto indigemus), nunc profecto tempus estquod nobis praestet auxilium, et pandat ipse qum dixit. Quomodo Salvator noster in Evangeliis quasdam parabolas ipse interpretatur, sic et nunc pmphcta in secunda prophetia quae in reliquis Iecta est , significat. quia aquila prior Nabuchodonosor sit rex Babylonis qui ingressus est in Libanum, id est Jerusalem ; et accepit de summis cedri, id est regem Jerusalem et principes ejus; et attulit ea in terram Chaldaaorum, scilicet in Babylonem. Plantavit quippe in captivitatem accipiens tilios Israel, et de regio semine, etde genere principum in eadem terra constituit. Post hoc autem, et post regiam stirpem, alia quoque multitudo capta est ab eo , et vitis ell‘ecta est, non tam robusta quam fuerat cum fuisset in vinea Dei et in terra sancta, uhi sacrificia Dei celebrantur, sed erat in Babylone translata vitis infirma. llis ita gestis, inter Pharaonem regem Egypti, et NabuchodonosOr regem Babylonis , bellum ortum est. Igitur populus qui cum regibus suis ac stirpe optimatum ab Assyriis fuerat amictus, reperta occasione qua jugum Nabuchodonosor abjiceret et ejus imperio liberaretur, intulit se ad secundam aquilam grandem, magnarum alarum, id est Pharaonem. Deinde sic ordine currente rerum, quia Deus non Pharaoni tradiderat, sed Nabuchodonosor, et illi non sustinentes judicium et imperium ejus, excusserant jugum Nabuchodonosor de cervicibus suis, et ad Pharaonem transgressi fuerant, ira Dei super eos iugruit,et contra evenit quam putaverant. Oportet quippe eum qui a Deo damnatur, non fugere sententiam ejus, nec voluntatem judicantis velle mutare, verum patientissime sustinere, donec ipse Deus liberet qui damnavit. Igitur quia ad Pharaonem transtulit se populus, relinquitur ab auxilio Dei, et pejora patitur quam ante perpessus est a Nabuchodonosor. Diximus solutionem parabolae juxta litteram ,et id quod scriptum est: sequitur durior interpretatio, et diflicilis ad intelligendum, secundum verum Nabuchodonosor, et verum Pharaonem, et ea verba quae de aquilis praedicta sunt. Idcirco autem ante interpositionem sequentis lectionis, hanc expositionem summatim strictimque praediximus, ut et praesens locus facilius intelligatur, ct nihilominus servetur loco suo plenior expositio, et consequens parabola etiam juxta allegoriam latissime disseratur.

What, then, is the parable of the eagle which the Holy Spirit shows in the present passage? It is described not only as an eagle, but, in comparison with other eagles, as a great eagle, with huge wings, long in extent, and full of talons, or, as one translator has it, full of feathers. Not only in what we have said is it greater than other eagles; it is especially distinguished in this, that it has the leading to enter Lebanon. For entering there, from the choice cedar tree that stood in Lebanon it plucked the tender shoots and the topmost parts, and brought them to the land of Canaan, into a city of merchants, or a trading city, or a city of those who carry across, or, as others have translated, a walled city; and it put there what it had taken from the cedar of Lebanon, to be planted and to grow in the land of Canaan. After this the same eagle took to itself seed from outside, from the seed of the land from which it had taken the tops of the cedar, and planted it in a leafy plain over many waters. And this very thing that had been taken from the land of Canaan by the one who had plucked the tops of Lebanon (that is, what it had taken the second time) became a vine, not strong but weak, and small in stature too; and the branches of this vine bent down toward what had been taken from Lebanon and the cedar, so that it had its roots planted under its trunk. And indeed it became a vine, and made shoots, and spread out its branches. And after this came another eagle, it too great, with great wings and abundant feathers or talons; and behold, this vine of which we have just spoken, when the second eagle came, turned its covenant toward it, scorning the covenant it had first made with the tree under which it had become a bent vine and, having made shoots, had spread its branches more widely; and it embraced the second eagle and transferred its roots from the first to the next. Then it sent out branches to the second eagle, that it might water it, with the soil of its planting, in a good plain with much water. And indeed this vine was watered and transferred to the second eagle, so that it might grow, bear fruit, and become a great vine. Therefore the prophet is commanded to say that the vine which transgressed the covenant it had made with the first eagle and established it with the second will not prosper, nor will the roots of its tenderness spring up; rather its fruits will rot because of its going over, and everything that sprang from it will wither, and it will no longer have a great arm and many people; it will be plucked up by the roots, and though it has been watered it will not last nor prosper in fruitfulness; and as soon as the scorching wind touches it, it will wither and dry up together with the soil of its planting. The setting forth of the story itself requires that we tell more plainly, with some added words, what was said obscurely. But if it is so great a labor to understand what is said, what need is there to say how much obscurity the question itself holds: who is the first eagle, what is Lebanon, what is the cedar, what the top of the cedar, who the second eagle, what the transfer of the vine from the first to the next? If ever we needed God’s help (and in understanding the Scriptures we always need the Holy Spirit), now surely is the time for him to give us help and himself open what he has said. Just as our Savior in the Gospels himself interprets certain parables, so now too the prophet, in the second prophecy which was read in what remains, indicates that the first eagle is Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who entered Lebanon, that is, Jerusalem, and took from the tops of the cedar, that is, the king of Jerusalem and his princes, and brought them to the land of the Chaldeans, namely Babylon. For he planted the sons of Israel by taking them into captivity, and settled some of the royal seed and of the race of princes in that land. After this, and after the royal stock, another multitude too was taken by him, and it became a vine, not as strong as it had been when it was in God’s vineyard and in the holy land, where God’s sacrifices are offered: transplanted into Babylon, it was a weak vine. When these things had happened, war arose between Pharaoh king of Egypt and Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon. So the people that had been carried off by the Assyrians with its kings and the stock of its nobles, finding an occasion to throw off Nebuchadnezzar’s yoke and be freed from his rule, betook itself to the second great eagle with great wings, that is, Pharaoh. Then, as the course of events ran on, because God had handed them over not to Pharaoh but to Nebuchadnezzar, and they, not enduring his judgment and rule, had shaken Nebuchadnezzar’s yoke from their necks and gone over to Pharaoh, the wrath of God fell upon them, and the opposite of what they had expected happened. For one who is condemned by God must not flee his sentence, nor want to change the will of the judge, but must endure most patiently until God himself, who condemned him, sets him free. So, because the people went over to Pharaoh, it is abandoned by God’s help and suffers worse things than it had suffered before from Nebuchadnezzar. We have given the solution of the parable according to the letter and to what is written; there follows a harder interpretation, difficult to understand, concerning the true Nebuchadnezzar and the true Pharaoh and the words spoken of the eagles. We have set out this exposition briefly and concisely before bringing in the following reading, so that the present passage may be understood more easily, while a fuller exposition is kept for its place, and the following parable may also be discussed at length according to allegory.

Ezek 17:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:15 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Origen retells the parable of the two eagles and the vine and explains its literal sense: Nebuchadnezzar took Jerusalem’s king and people to Babylon, and their turning to Pharaoh brought worse ruin.

  • Quotations and allusions: Ezek 17:3–10 (retold), 17:12–15 (the prophet’s own explanation). The several renderings of the city’s name come from the different Greek versions. “Carried off” renders the scan’s “amictus”, probably for “abductus”; the Babylonians are called Assyrians. Leaked marginal references are removed by a logged correction.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked marginal references): relinquitur “ lsa. λι, 51. Gen. rus, ab auxilio → relinquitur ab auxilio.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Ezech. 11.2 (PG 13:746a–748d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-ezechielem/11-1/#p-11-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-ezechielem-11-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin in the Migne PG 13 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged; badly garbled passages and gaps supplied from Baehrens, GCS 33, and noted); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.

11.3PG 13:748d–750a

Verum nunc pauca debemus assumere, et quasi quodam armamento futurae interpretationi viam sternere dehis quae nobis Dei gratialargitur, scientes qmd in sequenti plenius exponemusIAc primum quidem videndum est, quare Nabuchodonosor et Pharao aquila: dicantur. Forsitan quarrit quispiam qui non otiose et transitoria Scripturas legit: Nabuchodonosor aquila est magna, et magnarum aiarum, et hic Pharao alia aquila magna similiter alarum ingentium, etin lege inter immunda animalia posita est aquila ; quare et justus dives enectus prseparat sibi alas aquilae, ut possitconverti in domum principis sui ? Quare etiam repromissio quaedam est apud Isaiam prophetam dicentem : Iusti accipient pennas ut aquilae, current et non laborabunt, gradientur et non esurient?Si enim immunda est aquila, non oportet nos pennas accipere ut aquilam, cum justi fuerimus; neque cum divitiae nobis creverint opormodo ergo leo dicitur et in malam partem et in bonam, non est incongruum etiam aquilam in utramque partem accipi. Et ego suspicor, justus non est aquila, sed quasi aquila, aemulatur quippe aquilam. Et quomodo serpens aereus typus fuit Salvatoris : neque enim serpens erat vere, sed imitabatur serpentem, dicente Domino : Ut Moyses elevavit serpentem in deserto, sic oportet exaltari Filium Itaminis; eodem modo et justus non tam aquilaest, quam aquilae similis, quia ei utile est imaginem aquilae sectari. Juxta hunc intellectum , et in alio loco pmceptum accepit justus, ut sit sapiens sicut serpens, non ut fiat serpens, sed ne a veri serpentis capiatur astutia. Si autem sermo Dei Scripturas diligenter excutiens, et spiritus de quo scriptum est 3”: Spiritus omnia scrutatur etiam alta Dei , in alicujus animam venerit, manifestissime ostendet de Scripturis et aquilam et leonem in parte mundorum animalium posita: cherubim Dei habere faciem hominis et faciem leonis a dextris quatuor partium, et faciem vituli et faciem aquin a sinistris quatuor partium : et haec quae in cherubim videntur, id est aquila et leo, munda sunt. Nihil quippe immundum est in curru Dei. Et quomodo tu de gentibus credens mundus effectus es : Et quod Deus mandavit , tu ne commune dixeris , dicitur de omnibus qum caelo pendentiaostensa sunt Petro; sic mundatus est leo et aquila quae in cherubim apparuerunt. Nec non est aliud quod in Christi adventu futurum prtedicatur ε novit mundum leonem, mundam et aqui- ο lam, quae nuncupatur immunda: Lupus enim et agnifpascentur simul δ’. Lupus enim qui cum ove innoxius pascitur, non est ultra observandus. Non mihi dicitur de tali lupo : Attendite ab eis qui veniunt ad vasin vestitu ovium , intus autem sunt lupi rapaces. Signanter loeutus est, dicens : Intus autem sunt lupi rapaces. Sunt quippe alii non rapaces , quando lupi etagnipascentur simul, et vitulus, et taurus, et leo pariteredent. Cum autem fuerit tam diversarum inter se naturarum in fide Christi facta sociatio , leo non erit jam immundus, verum feritatis suae obliviscetur, et universa animalia quae in lege Dei dicuntur immunda, conditionis antiquae recipient puritatem. Hoc autem et ex parte jam factum est, et plenissime in secundo complebitur adventu.Pr:evenit igitur sacramentum quod ostensum est in cherubim, rei veritatem: et in tantum leonis et aquilae facies cum aliis faciebus cognata: sunt, ut majus nobis videatur vitulo, et tauro,etleone simul pascentibus, id quod apparuit in cherubim. Ab Isaia quippe-nihil de his quae praedicta sunt sibi cohaerens et invicem connexum repromittitur. in cherubim vero unumquodque animal cum alio cognatum est, facies vituli faciei leonis, et vultus hominis vultui aquilae. Non igitur magnopere mireris, cum Pharao et praecedens eum Nabuchodonosor aquilae nuncupantur ; justus vero pennas assumere dicatur ut aquila, ct in Dei parte dives effectus aquilae sibi pennas praeparet ad velandum.

But now we must take up a few points and, with a kind of equipment drawn from what the grace of God grants us, pave the way for the interpretation to come, knowing that we will expound it more fully in what follows. And first we must see why Nebuchadnezzar and Pharaoh are called eagles. Perhaps someone who does not read the Scriptures idly and in passing asks: Nebuchadnezzar is a great eagle with great wings, and here Pharaoh is another great eagle, likewise with huge wings; yet in the law the eagle is set among the unclean animals. Why, then, does the righteous man who has become rich prepare for himself the wings of an eagle, so that he can return to the house of his master? Why too is there a promise in the prophet Isaiah, who says: “The righteous will take wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not hunger”? For if the eagle is unclean, we ought not to take wings like an eagle when we are righteous, nor, when riches have grown for us, ought we … So, just as the lion is spoken of both in a bad sense and in a good, it is not unfitting that the eagle too be taken in both senses. And I suspect that the righteous man is not an eagle but like an eagle; for he imitates the eagle. And just as the bronze serpent was a type of the Savior (for it was not truly a serpent but imitated a serpent, as the Lord says: “As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up”), in the same way the righteous man is not so much an eagle as like an eagle, because it is useful for him to follow the image of the eagle. According to this understanding the righteous man received a command in another place to be wise as a serpent: not to become a serpent, but so as not to be caught by the cunning of the true serpent. But if the word of God, examining the Scriptures diligently, and the Spirit of whom it is written, “The Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God,” comes into someone’s soul, he will show most clearly from the Scriptures that the eagle and the lion too are placed among the clean animals: the cherubim of God have the face of a man and the face of a lion on the right of the four, and the face of an ox and the face of an eagle on the left of the four; and the things that are seen in the cherubim, that is, the eagle and the lion, are clean. For nothing is unclean in God’s chariot. And just as you, believing from among the Gentiles, have been made clean (and “What God has cleansed, do not call common” is said of all the things that were shown to Peter hanging from heaven), so the lion and the eagle that appeared in the cherubim have been cleansed. And there is another thing that is foretold for the coming of Christ: it knows a clean lion and a clean eagle, though they are called unclean. “For the wolf and the lambs will feed together.” The wolf that feeds harmlessly with the sheep is no longer to be guarded against. Of such a wolf it is not said to me: “Beware of those who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves.” He spoke pointedly, saying, “But inwardly they are ravening wolves.” For there are others that are not ravening, when wolves and lambs will feed together, and the calf and the bull and the lion will eat together. And when such an association of natures so different from one another has come about in the faith of Christ, the lion will no longer be unclean but will forget its fierceness, and all the animals that are called unclean in God’s law will receive back the purity of their original condition. This has already been done in part, and will be fulfilled most fully at the second coming. So the mystery that was shown in the cherubim anticipated the truth of the thing; and the faces of the lion and the eagle are so closely akin to the other faces that what appeared in the cherubim seems to us greater than the calf, the bull, and the lion feeding together. For Isaiah promises nothing of these foretold things as cohering and joined to one another; but in the cherubim each living being is akin to another: the face of the ox to the face of the lion, and the face of the man to the face of the eagle. So do not greatly wonder when Pharaoh, and Nebuchadnezzar before him, are called eagles, while the righteous man is said to take wings like an eagle, and the man made rich in God’s portion prepares for himself the wings of an eagle to fly.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Lev 11:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Prov 23:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 40:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 21:9 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:16 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 1:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 10:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The eagle, though unclean in the law, is used in Scripture in both bad and good senses; the cherubim and the peace of Isa 11 show unclean creatures cleansed in Christ.

  • Quotations: Lev 11:13; Prov 23:5 (Septuagint); Isa 40:31; Num 21:9 and John 3:14; Matt 10:16; 1 Cor 2:10; Ezek 1:10; Acts 10:15; Isa 11:6–7 (65:25); Matt 7:15. Words are lost in the scan after “nor, when riches have grown for us, ought we”; marked “…”. The hope that unclean animals will regain their original purity is Origen’s; translated as written. A leaked marginal reference is removed by a logged correction.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked marginal reference): dicatur Act. x,15. Λ ut aquila → dicatur ut aquila.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Ezech. 11.3 (PG 13:748d–750a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-ezechielem/11-1/#p-11-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-ezechielem-11-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin in the Migne PG 13 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged; badly garbled passages and gaps supplied from Baehrens, GCS 33, and noted); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.

11.4PG 13:750a–751a

Verum ut ad propositum redeam, specialiter quiddam significatur de Nabuchodonosor, quia magna et magnarum alarum, et sui extensione longissima, in tantum ut ausus fuerit dicere 9‘: Viribus faciam, sapientia intellectus auferam fines gentium et virtutem eorum depascar, et commovebo civitates quae inltabitantur, et orbem terrarum universum comprehendam manu ut nidum, et quasi confracta ova auferam. Ecce ista est extensio alarum ejus. Nec hoc ei sufficit, verum unguibus plenus cst, ct multis plumis, et habet ductum intrandi in Libanum, ut cedri ejus summa decerpat. Quandiu hi qui commorabantur in Libano non peccaverunt, id est quandiu in Jerosolymis positi, sunt in sceleribus deprehensi, non accepit potestatem ista magna aquila ut ingrederetur in Libanum, neque assumpsit sibi electa, et cedri semen regium, et principum stirpem. lsta quippe sunt teneritudinis ejus, quae quodam tempore non fuerunt duro corde : attamen rapuit ea, quia peccaverunt in Dominum. Aquila ista grandis, totius arboris cacumina in Chanaan transtulit, quia figuraliter Babyloniorum terra maledicti Chanaan dicitur, de quo ait Noe θ’ : Maledictus puer Chanaan, famulus erit fratribus suis. In civitate quoque negotiatorum, sive negotia. trice, sive transferentium, aut certe murata, posuit hoc quod de cedro abstulerat, et accepit sibi de scmine terrae, jam non de altioribus solum, sed etiam de minoribus, et de populo Judeeorum, et dedit illud in campum frondiferum, super aquam multant respiciendum constituit illud, et exortum est, et factum est in vitem firmam. lniirmatus est vere populus Dei in Babylone, et ideo neque canticum Domini cantare poterat, dicens : Quomodo cantabimus canticum Domini in terra aliena? Revera non poterat infirma non esse quas plantata fuerat in Babylone. Quo pacto vires pristinas reservaret qua: vitis Babylonia esse cmpisset? Quae quia in sancta terra fructus non fecerat, ideo translata ab aquila, et in terra posita Chanaan, facta est in vitem infirmam etin pusillam statura. Quandiu in terra sancta fuit, ingens vitis erat : quando vero translata est in fines peccatorum, et infit-manet parva effecta est. Et ιιι igitur, vitis quae me audis, si vis esse magna, noli exire de Ecclesia: finibus, permane in terra sancta Jerusalem. Quod si propter peccata in pejora corrueris, transfereris in aliam terram, et eris in vitem pusillam, et palmites tui decident, et radices tuae siccabuntur, in tantum ut postea desideres requiescere super aliam aquilam, ut nunc dicitur, magnarum alarum et plurimorum unguium. Bonum est condemnatum in condemnationis permanere sententia, quandiu ei libet qui damnavit. Non curramus volentes ad Pharaonem. Si enim ad eum currimus, contra Deum facimus qui dixit”: Ego sum Dommus Deus luus,qui te eduxi de terra Egypti, de domo servitutis. Ad Nabuchodonosor enim non tam sponte properamus, quam condemnati et pertract-i ad eum sumus.

But to return to the subject: something is signified specially about Nebuchadnezzar, that he is great, with great wings and of the widest spread, so much that he dared to say: “By strength I will do it; by the wisdom of understanding I will remove the boundaries of the nations and feed on their strength, and I will shake the inhabited cities, and I will seize the whole world in my hand like a nest, and take it away like broken eggs.” Behold, this is the spread of his wings. Nor is this enough for him: he is full of talons and of many feathers, and he has the leading to enter Lebanon, to pluck the tops of its cedar. As long as those who dwelt in Lebanon did not sin, that is, as long as those placed in Jerusalem were not caught in crimes, this great eagle did not receive power to enter Lebanon, nor did he take for himself the choice things, the royal seed of the cedar and the stock of princes. For these are its tender shoots, which at one time were not hard of heart; yet he seized them, because they sinned against the Lord. This great eagle transferred the tops of the whole tree into Canaan, because figuratively the land of the Babylonians is called the land of the accursed Canaan, of whom Noah says: “Cursed be the boy Canaan; he will be a servant to his brothers.” In the city of merchants, or the trading city, or the city of those who carry across, or the walled city, he put what he had taken from the cedar; and he took for himself of the seed of the land, no longer from the higher ones only but also from the lesser, from the people of the Jews, and put it in a leafy plain; he set it to look out over much water; and it sprang up and became a vine, weak. Truly the people of God was weakened in Babylon, and so it could not sing the Lord’s song, saying: “How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?” Truly the vine that had been planted in Babylon could not but be weak. How could the vine that had begun to be a Babylonian vine keep its former strength? Because it had not borne fruit in the holy land, it was transferred by the eagle and set in the land of Canaan, and became a weak vine, small in stature. As long as it was in the holy land, it was a huge vine; but when it was transferred to the territory of sinners, it became weak and small. So you too, the vine who hear me: if you wish to be great, do not go out of the boundaries of the Church; remain in the holy land of Jerusalem. But if because of your sins you fall into worse things, you will be transferred to another land and become a small vine, and your branches will fall and your roots will dry up, so that afterwards you will long to rest upon another eagle, as is now said, with great wings and many talons. It is good for one who is condemned to remain under the sentence of condemnation as long as it pleases him who condemned. Let us not run willingly to Pharaoh. For if we run to him, we act against God, who said: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.” For we do not hasten to Nebuchadnezzar of our own will so much as we are condemned and dragged to him.

Ezek 17:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 10:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 10:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 9:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 137:4 (136:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 20:2 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Nebuchadnezzar could take Jerusalem’s leaders only because they sinned; the transplanted vine grew weak, so believers should stay within the Church and accept God’s chastisement rather than flee to “Pharaoh.”

  • Quotations: Ezek 17:3–6; Isa 10:13–14; Gen 9:25; Ps 137:4 (136:4 LXX); Exod 20:2. “A vine, weak”: the scan reads “firmam” (firm), but the next sentence and the biblical text require “infirmam” (weak); translated by sense.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Ezech. 11.4 (PG 13:750a–751a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-ezechielem/11-1/#p-11-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-ezechielem-11-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin in the Migne PG 13 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged; badly garbled passages and gaps supplied from Baehrens, GCS 33, and noted); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.

11.5PG 13:751a–752b

Sequitur ” : Et [actum est, aquila altera magna, magnis alis et copiosis unguibus, et ecce tritis ista amplexabitur eam, id est, secundam aquilam. Evenit saepe ut ah una contraria fortitudine ad aliam transferamur. Iusserat enim Deus, ut Israclitarum populus sub Nabuchodonosor jugum colla submitteret, ut legimus in Jeremia, in tantum ut comminaretur ei qui ab ejus servitio declinaret; et eo tempore quo Jeremiam exposuimus , ea quas nobis gratia Dei orantibus vobis largita est, sive certe utcunque sensimus, exponere conati sumus. Noluit autem id facere quod fuerat imperatum , sed palmites suos extendit ad Pharaonem in gleba plantationis ejus; ab eo constituta est in campo super aquam multam, ut fructus all'erret uberrimos; et deserta Egypto rursum Aigyptum concupivit, putans se ubertatem pristinam consecuturam : hoc in primis cegitans quod si Nabuchodonosor ad Pharaonem transcenderet, radices firmaret, evelleret staturam, fructus all‘erret. Sed in contrarium quam putavit omnia reciderunt. Fructus quippe ejus omnis computruit, et pullulationes quae saltem modica: in Babylonem venerant, mutatione regionis exaruerunt, in tantum ut radicitus evulsa sit, ne ultra in brachio magno aut in populo plurimo convalesceret. Quid in se haec tanta vel talia continent ο sacramenta? Quid unusquisque sermo significat? Possumus, si tamen habeamus auditores, ad aliam quamdam Ierusalem conscendere, et tibi demonstrare quomodo aquila magna ductum suum fecerit, et in hanc quam nunc nos possidemus Babylonem summitates ejus detulerit. Possumus secretiora quaedam de Pharaone loqui: verum quia tempore coarctamnr, et forte audenter promittimus quod non valeamus implere, ad minora redeamus, et secundum mensuram intellectus nostri sic potius exponamus. Venit ad istum Libanum, hoc est Ecclesiam, ubi IIOSlliB Dei, ubi incensum orationum ejus celebratur, ista magna et vera aquila Nabuchodonosor, id est diabolus, et rapuit. Absit autem a ternporibus nostris, ut de summis cedri, id est de ι) principibus, et de regio semine in Chanaan transferat. Oremus ne fiat quod saepe factum est. Assumpti enim sunt quidam, et in Babylonem translati, qui in Ecclesia principes luerunt, et propter peccatum suum de Libani summitate sublati. Super his dicendum cst, quia aquila magna magnorum unguium, plumis extensa acceperit de cacuminibus cedri, ct deraserit eos de Libano, id est de Jerusalcnt, et plantaverit in terra Chanaan. Non solum autem aquila ista summa cedri, id est de Optimatum genere sibi vindicat, sed et terra: semen rapit, ct transfert in terram Chanaan, quando quis de populo peccat, et de Dei plebe diaboli laqueis prapeditur. Quapropter diebus et noctibus tam pro nobis quam pro fratribus nostris Dei imploremus auxilium, ne quis de Jerusalem transferatur in Chanaan, ne sententia ejus deserta a voluntate illius ad aliam tendamus aquilam, et veniat super nos ira major. et putrescat universa plantatio,et fruetus pariter cum radicibus arescat. Plantatio quippe Jerusalem non potest in alia terra ferre fructus, non facit palmites in finibus alienis, sed statim eum gleba sua siccatur si non perseveraveritin voluntate Dei, et in Ecclesia ejus, id est in factis, et sermonibus, et scientia veritatis Christi Jesu: cui est gloria et imperium in secula saeculorum. Amen.

There follows: “And it came to pass: another great eagle, with great wings and abundant talons; and behold, this vine will embrace it,” that is, the second eagle. It often happens that we are transferred from one opposing power to another. For God had commanded that the people of the Israelites should submit their necks to Nebuchadnezzar’s yoke, as we read in Jeremiah, so much so that he threatened anyone who turned away from serving him; and at the time when we expounded Jeremiah, we tried to set out what the grace of God granted us through your prayers, or at any rate whatever we perceived. But the vine would not do what had been commanded, but stretched out its branches to Pharaoh in the soil of its planting; by him it was set in a plain over much water to bear the richest fruit; and having deserted Egypt, it desired Egypt again, thinking it would regain its former fruitfulness, and thinking above all that if it went over from Nebuchadnezzar to Pharaoh, it would strengthen its roots, raise its stature, and bear fruit. But everything fell out contrary to what it expected. For all its fruit rotted, and the shoots that had come, small as they were, into Babylon withered with the change of region, so that it was plucked up by the roots, no longer to grow strong in a great arm or in many people. What do these mysteries, so great and of such a kind, contain? What does each word signify? If we had hearers for it, we could climb to another Jerusalem and show you how the great eagle made its way and carried off its tops into this Babylon which we now inhabit. We could speak of more secret things concerning Pharaoh; but because we are pressed for time, and perhaps we boldly promise what we cannot fulfil, let us return to lesser things and rather expound according to the measure of our understanding. To this Lebanon, that is, the Church, where God’s sacrifices are offered and the incense of prayers to him is presented, came this great and true eagle Nebuchadnezzar, that is, the devil, and seized. Far be it from our times that he should carry off into Canaan any of the tops of the cedar, that is, of the leaders, and of the royal seed. Let us pray that what has often happened may not happen. For certain men who were leaders in the Church have been taken and transferred into Babylon, and because of their sin removed from the top of Lebanon. Of them it must be said that the great eagle, with great talons and spread with feathers, took from the tops of the cedar and scraped them off from Lebanon, that is, from Jerusalem, and planted them in the land of Canaan. And this eagle claims for itself not only the tops of the cedar, that is, those of the noblest rank, but also seizes the seed of the land and carries it into the land of Canaan, when someone of the people sins and someone of God’s people is entangled in the snares of the devil. Therefore let us implore God’s help day and night, both for ourselves and for our brothers, that no one may be transferred from Jerusalem into Canaan; that we may not, deserting his sentence and his will, turn to another eagle, so that a greater wrath comes upon us, and the whole planting rots, and the fruit withers together with the roots. For the planting of Jerusalem cannot bear fruit in another land, nor make branches in foreign territory, but at once dries up with its soil if it does not persevere in the will of God and in his Church, that is, in the deeds and words and knowledge of the truth of Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Ezek 17:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 17:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 17:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 27:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 27:12 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Allegorically, the great eagle is the devil, who carries off leaders and ordinary believers from the Church through sin; only by remaining in the Church can the vine bear fruit.

  • Quotations: Ezek 17:7–10; Jer 27:8, 12. Origen refers to his own earlier homilies on Jeremiah.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Ezech. 11.5 (PG 13:751a–752b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-ezechielem/11-1/#p-11-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-ezechielem-11-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin in the Migne PG 13 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged; badly garbled passages and gaps supplied from Baehrens, GCS 33, and noted); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.