Homilies on Leviticus 13.1–13.6

Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 13

13.1PG 12:544a–545a

Qui perfectus est , ab ipso Deo docetur de solemnitatqu ratione, et homine ad luec discenda Inagistro non utitur, sed a Deo discit, si quis [must capere Dei vocem. Qui autem non est talis, sed iaferior, discit ab eo qui didicerit a Deo. Ilaec erga cst de solemnitatibus (lupch quaedam ratio thCIritue. llumquailluminata per spiritum prophetica mea; docetur, quae, ut ita dicam, magis intuitu mentis discitur quam sono vocis, per quam veritas ipsa, non mnbra et imago veritatis agnoscitur. lli vero qui ipsam Dei claritatem capere non possunt, nec totum fulgorem veritatis intenta mentis acie conspicari, audiunt de solemnitatibus secundo loco ab his, qui primo didicerunt; et cum illis veritatem rerum ipsa inspectiouis proprietas dederit, ad istos veritatis umbram profert solus auditus. Hujus mysterii Apostolus conscius dicebat de Iudaeis, quia umbra: et exemplari deserviunt cmicstiutii ’. Ipsa enim coelestia Moyses vidisse describitur, typos autem et imagines eorum quae viderat populo tradidisse. Sic enim ad eum divinum dicit eloquium: Vide, inquit ", omnia facito secundum formal quae ostensa est tibi in monte. Tale ergo estqaol et in hoc loco recitatum est, quia Dominus locutus luerit de solemnitatibus ad Moysen. Et post haec: Et locutus est Moyses, inquit", dies solemucs Domini Dei liliis Israel. Transacto vero de his sermone videamus quid post haec educetur Moyses. Primo de lucerna et candelabro, et oleo quod ei iafunditur; secundo loco de mensa , et panibus pro. positionis, ac numero eorum, et qui eis uti debeant. lntendamus ergo animum diligentius his quae scripta sunt, el ad haec dignoscenda concedi nobis gratiam Domini deprecemur, ιιι in his quae legimus litteris,quze sit voluntas sancti Spiritus agnoscamus. Praecipe, inquit", filiis Israel, ut deferant tibi oleum de olivis-mundum expressum ad lumen. ιιι ardeat lucerna semper extra velum in taberna. culo testimonii, et accendent illam Aaron et lilii ejus a vespere usque in mane contra Dominum indesinenter, legitimum aeteruale iu progenies vestras. In candelabro nmndo accendetis lucernas contra Dominum usque mane. Candelabrum mundum nontiuat, lucernas accendi per pontificem jubet, et earnm lumen ministrari ex oleo quod datur a populo praecepit. Itaque nisi dederit oleum populus. sine dubio exstingnctur lucerna , et non erit lumen in sanctis. Secundum litteram ergo hzec erat consequentia, ut conferret populus olemu tnundum de olivis expressum, ut ex eo ministraretur lumen lucernas; et Aaron accendebat lucernas a vespera usque inane, fomentis olei quod contulerat populus, lumini pabulum praebens. ’ ν

One who is perfect is taught by God himself about the meaning of the festivals, and does not use a human teacher to learn these things but learns from God, if anyone is able to receive the voice of God. But one who is not such, but lower, learns from one who has learned from God. There is, then, a twofold account of the festivals. One is taught by a prophetic mind enlightened by the Spirit, which, so to speak, is learned more by the gaze of the mind than by the sound of the voice, and through which the truth itself, not the shadow and image of the truth, is recognized. But those who cannot receive the very brightness of God, nor behold the whole radiance of the truth with the keen gaze of the mind, hear about the festivals in the second place from those who learned first; and whereas to the former the very nature of their seeing has given the truth of the realities, to the latter hearing alone brings the shadow of the truth. Conscious of this mystery the Apostle said of the Jews that they serve a shadow and copy of the heavenly things. For Moses is described as having seen the heavenly things themselves, but as having handed on to the people types and images of what he had seen. For so the divine word says to him: “See,” it says, “make everything according to the pattern that was shown you on the mountain.” Such, then, is what was read in this place also, that the Lord spoke about the festivals to Moses. And after this: “And Moses spoke,” it says, “the solemn days of the Lord God to the children of Israel.” Having finished the discourse about these, let us see what Moses is taught after this: first about the lamp and the lampstand and the oil that is poured into it; second about the table and the loaves of presentation, their number, and who ought to use them. Let us then attend more carefully to what is written, and pray that the grace of the Lord be granted us to discern these things, so that in the letters we read we may recognize what the will of the Holy Spirit is. “Command,” it says, “the children of Israel to bring you pure oil pressed from olives for the light, so that a lamp may burn continually outside the veil in the tabernacle of testimony; and Aaron and his sons shall light it from evening until morning before the Lord without ceasing, a perpetual ordinance for your generations. On the pure lampstand you shall light the lamps before the Lord until morning.” It names a pure lampstand, orders the lamps to be lit by the high priest, and commands that their light be supplied from oil given by the people. And so, unless the people give oil, the lamp will without doubt go out, and there will be no light in the holy place. According to the letter, then, the sequence was this: the people contributed pure oil pressed from olives, so that light might be supplied to the lamp from it; and Aaron lit the lamps from evening until morning, giving food to the light from the supply of oil that the people had contributed.

Heb 8:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 25:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 23:44 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:4 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The perfect learn the meaning of the festivals directly from God, others through teachers; Origen introduces the laws of the lamp and the loaves of presentation.

  • Heb 8:5; Exod 25:40; Lev 23:44; Lev 24:2–4. Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.1 (PG 12:544a–545a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

13.2PG 12:545a–546b

Verum quoniam lex spiritalis est, petamus a Domino (si tamen conversi sumus ad Dominum) auferri nobis velamen de lectione Veteris Testa. menti, nt possimus advertere quae ratio sit candelabri, vel lucernarum ejus secundum intelligentiam spiritalem. Ante adventum Domini mei Jesu Christi, sol non oriebatur populo Israel, sed lucernae lumine utebatur. Lucerna enim erat apud eos sermo legis, et sermo prOpheticus, intra augustos conclusa parietes, qua, ηοη potem ίη orbem lumen cil‘undere. Intra Judaeam namque concludebatnr scientia Dei, sicut et Propheta dicit” : Notus in Jutltea Deus. Ubi vero exortus est sol justitize‘Dominus et Salvator noster, et natus est vir de quo scriptum est ε Ecce vir, Oriens nomen est ei; per universum mundum scientiae Dei lumen etfusum est. Sermo ergo legis, ct sermo propheticus erat lucerna ardens, sed ardebat intra sedem, nec ultra poterat emittere splendorem suum. Quod autem sermo legis et prophetarum lucerna dicatur, Dentinus ipse nos docuit dicens de Joanne Baptista : llle erat lucerna ardens et lucens, et vos voluistis ad horam exsultare in lumine ejus. fit alibi dicit , quia lex et prophetae usque ad Joannem. Lucer— α na itaque ardens estJoannes, in quo lex concluditur et prophetae. Donec ergo populus ille habebat oleum quod eonferretad lumen, lucerna non est exstincta. Ubi vero defecit in eis oleum misericordiae, oleum operum bonorum, nec inventa est apud eos puritas, purum namque oleum quaerebatur ad lumen, et quia defecit in eis oleum misericordiae, necessario exstincta lucerna est. Sed quid dicemus quia illis haec evenerunt, a nobis vero aliena sunt ista? IIIIO major cura est Christiano olei conquirendi. Vide enim 255 quomodo Dominus in Evangeliis‘pcr parabo- ο lattt stultas virgines nominat,qu:e oleum non portabant in vasculis suis; et intantum stultas, ut quoniam defuit eis oleum ad suceendendas lampades suas, thalamis exclusa: sint nuptiarmn, nec pulsan— ι) tibus quae olei curam neglexerant, ultra aperirijusserit sponsus. Memini tamen dudum nos cum ceniesimi decimi octavi psalmi exponeremus illmn .ersiculum, in quo scriptum est : Lucerna peiibus meis lex tua, Domine, et lumen semitis neis, diversitatem Incertum. et lucis pro viribus lSlCIIdISSC. Dicebamus enim quod lucernam quidem ledibus, id est inferioribus corporis partibus demtarit, lucem vero semitis dederit, quae semita: in alio loco semita: aeternae nominantur. Quia ergo secundum quamdam mysticam rationem inferiores partes creaturae mundus hic intelligitur, ideo lucerna legis his, qui in hoc mundo tauquam totius creatura: pedes sunt, accensa memoratur. Lnx autem azterna erit illis semitis, per quas in futuro saeculo unusquisque pro meritis incedet. Sed de his in suo loco sufficienter pro nostris viribus dictum est. Nunc ergo quoniam vespera est et nox usque ad consummationem saeculi, et usquequo novus dies futuri saeculi et novae lucis eil’ulgeat, ardet unicuique nostrum lucerna haec, intantnm splendorem luminis praebens, quantum olei copia ubertate ορδεruml’uerit ministrata. Denique et Job in quodam loco, cum bona operum suorum exponeret, addidit etiam hoc : ί Cum splenderet, inquit, lucerna super caput meum. Splendet ergo unicuique nostrum lucerna haec, inquantum oleo bonorum operum fuerit accensa. Si autem male agamus, et opera nostra mala sint, non solum non accendimus, sed exstinguimus nobis istam lucernam : et completur in nobis illud, quod Scriptura dicit", quia qui male agit, in tenebris est, et qui odit fratrem suum, in tenebris ambulat. Exstinxit enim lucernam charitatis, et ideo in tenebris ambulat. Annon tibi videtur exstinxisse lucernam, qui lumen charis tatis exstinxit? Qui autem diligit fratrem, in charitatis luce perdurat, etcum fiducia potest dicere : Ego autem sicut oliva fructifera in domo Dei, μ et”: «Filii ejus sicut novella: olivarum in circuitu mensae ejus. Oleum ergo offerri jubetur a populo, et oleum non qualecunque, sed mundum, etnon ex quibuscunque seminibus (ut fieri diversis in regionibus mos est), sed de olivis expressum, in quibus indicittm pacis ostenditur. Neque enim accepta possunt esse Deo opera tua, nisi in pace peragantnr : sicut et Jacobus apostolus dicit : Fructus autem justitia: in pace seminatur. Et idcirco, credo, etiam Dominus discipulis suis tradebat fidele depositum dicens “ : Pacem meam do vobis, pacem meam relinquo vobis. De hac ergo oliva oleum premamus operum nostrorum, ex quo lucerna Domino possit accendi, ttt nonin tenebris ambulemus. Ilaec quidem a nobis dicta sunt, quantum ad lucernam candelabri et oleum ejus spectat.

But since the law is spiritual, let us ask the Lord (if indeed we have turned to the Lord) to take away from us the veil over the reading of the Old Testament, so that we may perceive what the meaning of the lampstand and its lamps is according to spiritual understanding. Before the coming of my Lord Jesus Christ the sun did not rise for the people of Israel, but they used the light of a lamp. For the lamp among them was the word of the law and the prophetic word, enclosed within narrow walls, which could not pour its light out into the world. For the knowledge of God was shut up within Judaea, as the prophet too says: “God is known in Judaea.” But when the sun of righteousness, our Lord and Saviour, rose, and the man was born of whom it is written, “See, a man, East is his name,” the light of the knowledge of God was poured out through the whole world. The word of the law, then, and the prophetic word was a burning lamp, but it burned within a house and could not send its brightness beyond it. That the word of the law and of the prophets is called a lamp the Lord himself taught us, saying of John the Baptist: “He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for an hour in his light.” And elsewhere he says that the law and the prophets were until John. John, then, is a burning lamp, in whom the law and the prophets are concluded. As long, then, as that people had oil to contribute for the light, the lamp was not put out. But when the oil of mercy, the oil of good works, failed among them, and purity was not found among them (for pure oil was required for the light), then, because the oil of mercy failed in them, the lamp was necessarily put out. But what shall we say? That these things happened to them, while they are foreign to us? Rather, the Christian has a greater care to procure oil. For see how the Lord in the Gospels, through a parable, names as foolish the virgins who did not carry oil in their vessels; so foolish that, because they lacked oil to light their lamps, they were shut out of the wedding chamber, and the bridegroom ordered that it should no longer be opened to those who had neglected the care of oil when they knocked. I remember, however, that some time ago, when we were expounding the hundred and eighteenth psalm, at that verse in which it is written, “Your law, O Lord, is a lamp to my feet and a light to my paths,” we showed according to our strength the difference between a lamp and light. For we said that he assigned the lamp to the feet, that is, to the lower parts of the body, but gave light to the paths, which paths in another place are called eternal paths. Since, then, according to a certain mystical account, this world is understood as the lower parts of creation, therefore the lamp of the law is said to be lit for those who in this world are, as it were, the feet of the whole creation. But eternal light will belong to those paths along which each will walk in the age to come according to his merits. But of these things enough has been said in its place, according to our strength. Now, then, since it is evening and night until the consummation of the age, and until the new day of the age to come and of the new light shines forth, this lamp burns for each of us, giving as much brightness of light as the supply of oil from the abundance of works has furnished. Indeed Job too, in one place, when he set out the good of his works, added this also: “When,” he says, “the lamp shone above my head.” This lamp, then, shines for each of us in so far as it has been lit with the oil of good works. But if we act badly and our works are evil, we not only do not light this lamp but put it out for ourselves; and what Scripture says is fulfilled in us, that he who does evil is in darkness, and he who hates his brother walks in darkness. For he has put out the lamp of love, and therefore he walks in darkness. Does not he seem to you to have put out the lamp who has put out the light of love? But he who loves his brother abides in the light of love, and can say with confidence: “But I am like a fruitful olive tree in the house of God,” and: “His sons like young olive shoots around his table.” Oil, then, is commanded to be offered by the people, and not just any oil, but pure; and not from just any seeds (as is the custom in various regions), but pressed from olives, in which a sign of peace is shown. For your works cannot be acceptable to God unless they are done in peace, as the apostle James too says: “But the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace.” And therefore, I believe, the Lord too handed over a faithful deposit to his disciples, saying: “My peace I give you, my peace I leave you.” From this olive, then, let us press the oil of our works, from which a lamp may be lit for the Lord, so that we may not walk in darkness. These things we have said, then, as regards the lamp of the lampstand and its oil.

Rom 7:14 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 76:1 (75:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Mal 4:2 (3:20 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Zech 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 16:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 119:105 (118:105 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 6:16 (echo, low confidence) · Job 29:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:9 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 52:8 (51:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 128:3 (127:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 3:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:27 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The lamp fed by the people's oil is the law and the prophets, which went out among the Jews when their good works failed; Christians must keep their own lamps burning with the oil of good works, love, and peace.

  • Rom 7:14; 2 Cor 3:14–16; Ps 76:1 (Ps 75:2 LXX); Mal 4:2 (Mal 3:20 LXX); Zech 6:12 LXX; John 5:35; Luke 16:16 (Matt 11:13); Matt 25:1–12; Ps 119:105 (Ps 118:105 LXX; Origen's “hundred and eighteenth psalm” follows the LXX numbering; his commentary on it is lost); Jer 6:16 (“eternal paths”, uncertain); Job 29:3; 1 John 2:9–11; Ps 52:8 (Ps 51:10 LXX); Ps 128:3 (Ps 127:3 LXX); Jas 3:18; John 14:27. The statement that the lamp went out among the Jews is Origen's; translated exactly.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray Migne note marker): olivarum (l) in → olivarum in.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.2 (PG 12:545a–546b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

13.3PG 12:546b–548b

Nunc vero videamus quid etiam in consequentibus de panibus propositionis scriptum sit. Et sumetis, inquit ", sitnilaginem, et facietis de ea duodecim panes. De duabus decimis erit unus panis, et imponetis eos duas positiones, sex panes una positio super mensam ntundam contra Dominum. lit imponetis super positionem thus mundum, et 83‘ lem, et erunt panes in commemorationem appositi Domino : die sabbatorum proponentur contra Dominum semper a filiis Israel, in testamentum :eternum. Et erunt Aaron, et liliorum ejus, et edent ea in loco sancto : sunt cnim Sancta sanctorum. lloc erit illis de eis quae offeruntur Domino legitimum a-ternum. Secundum ea quae scripta sunt, in duodecim panibus duodecim trilmutn Israel videtur ronnnemoratio ante Dominum fieri, et praeceptum dari, ut sine cessatione isti duodecim panes in conspectu Domini proponantur; ut et memoria duodecim tribuum apud eum semper habeatur, quo veluti exoratio quanlam et supplicatio per lucc pro singulis fieri videatur. Sed parva satis et tenuis εει hujuscemodi intercessio. Quantum enim profecit ad repropitiandum, ubi uniuscujusque tribus per panem fructus, per fructus opera consideranda suntl Sed si refcrantur hazc ad mysterii magniludinem, invenies commemorationem istam habere ingentis repropitiatiouis efl'ectum. Si redeas ad illum panem qui de cwlo descendit, et dat huic mundo vitam : illum panem propositionis, quem proposuit Deus prOpitiationem per [idem in sanguine ejus: etsi respicias ad illam commemorationem, de qua dicit Dominus : lloc facile in meam commemorationem; invenies quod ista est commemoratio sola, quae propitium facit hominibus Demn. Si ergo intentius ecclesiastica mysteria recorderis, in his quae lex scribit, futura: veritatis invenies imaginem prasformatam. Sed de bis non est plura disse. rere, quod recordatione sola intelligi Sufficit. Possumus vero et aliter dicere. Omnis sermo Dei panis est, sed εει differentia in janilius. Est enim aliquis sermo, qui ad communem proferri possit auditum, et edet-ere plebem de operibus miscricordiae, ac totius beneficentiar, ct iste est panis qui communis videbitur. Est vero alius, qui secreta contineat, et de fide Dei et rerum scientia disserat. Iste panis mundus est, et ex simila confectus. Iste in conspectu Domini semper ponendtts εει, et super mensam mundam proponendus. Iste solis sacerdotibus sequestratus est, et liliis Aaron aeterno munere condonatus.\"erum ne putes lucc nos propriis sensibus excogitata narrare, ct non in divinis observas-0 voluminibus, proferant tibi de Scripturis quomodo apud diversos viros panis diversitas pro merito uniuscujusque servata est. Refertur in Genesi “ quod Abraham patriarcha angelos suscepit hospitio, similiter autem et Lot. Sed Abraham, qui meritis praecellebat, panes ex simila apposuisse describitur, quos et ἐγκρυφίας, id est occultos ac reconditos nominavit. Lot vero eo quod non habuit similam, ex farina panes hospitibus apposuit; non quod i'a pauper esset, ιιι ηυξ. habuerit similam, qui iu divitiis non inferior patruo scribitur; sed utriusque meritorum differentia per lucc designatur indicia :quod is quidem cui erant a Domino mysteria rcvclauda, et ad quem dicebatur ιδ, non celabo a puero meo Abraham quod facturus sum, qui imbuendus erat et edocendns de occultis et secretis Dei, ille panes ex simila Scribitur habuisse; ille vero ad quem nihil sacratnenti deferebatur, sed ratio przrscntis salutis et vitae, panes communes ex sola farina scribitur b.1buisse confectos. Et tu ergo si habes scientiam se cretorum, si de lide Dei, de mysterio Christi,da sancti Spiritus unitate potes scienter cauteque d ssererc, panes ex simila offers Domino. Si vero communibus meris ad populum monitis, et moralem scis tantummodo lorum tractare qui ad omnes pcrtinet, communem te obtulisse noveris panem.

Now let us see what is written in what follows about the loaves of presentation. “And you shall take fine flour,” it says, “and make twelve loaves of it. Each loaf shall be of two tenths, and you shall set them in two rows, six loaves in a row, on the pure table before the Lord. And you shall put pure frankincense and salt on the row, and the loaves shall be set before the Lord for a memorial. On the sabbath day they shall be set before the Lord continually by the children of Israel, as an everlasting covenant. And they shall be for Aaron and his sons, and they shall eat them in a holy place, for they are the holy of holies. This shall be for them an everlasting ordinance from the things offered to the Lord.” According to what is written, in the twelve loaves a memorial of the twelve tribes of Israel seems to be made before the Lord, and the command is given that these twelve loaves be set without ceasing in the sight of the Lord, so that the memory of the twelve tribes may always be kept before him, by which a kind of entreaty and supplication seems to be made through these for each one. But such intercession is quite small and slight. For how much did it avail for propitiation, where the fruits of each tribe are to be considered through the loaf, and its works through the fruits? But if these things are referred to the greatness of the mystery, you will find that this memorial has the effect of a mighty propitiation. If you return to that bread which came down from heaven and gives life to this world, that bread of presentation whom God set forth as a propitiation through faith in his blood; and if you look to that memorial of which the Lord says, “Do this in remembrance of me,” you will find that this is the only memorial that makes God propitious to men. If, then, you recall more attentively the mysteries of the church, you will find the image of the future truth prefigured in what the law writes. But it is not necessary to discuss these things further, for it suffices to understand them by recollection alone. But we can also speak otherwise. Every word of God is bread, but there is a difference among loaves. For there is a word which can be brought before a common audience and teach the people about the works of mercy and all beneficence, and this is the bread that will be seen as common. But there is another which contains secrets and discourses about faith in God and the knowledge of realities. This bread is pure and made of fine flour. This must always be set in the sight of the Lord and laid out on the pure table. This is reserved for the priests alone and granted to the sons of Aaron as an everlasting gift. But lest you think that we are telling things thought out by our own understanding and not observed in the divine books, let us bring forward for you from the Scriptures how among different men a difference of bread was kept according to each one's merit. It is related in Genesis that the patriarch Abraham received angels as guests, and likewise Lot. But Abraham, who excelled in merits, is described as having set out loaves of fine flour, which he also called enkryphiai, that is, hidden and stored away. But Lot, because he did not have fine flour, set before his guests loaves of meal; not that he was so poor as not to have fine flour, since he is described as not inferior in riches to his uncle; but by these signs the difference of the merits of each is indicated: the one to whom mysteries were to be revealed by the Lord, and to whom it was said, “I will not hide from my servant Abraham what I am about to do,” who was to be instructed and taught about the hidden and secret things of God, is written to have had loaves of fine flour; but the other, to whom nothing of the sacrament was brought, but only the account of present safety and life, is written to have had common loaves made of meal only. You too, then, if you have knowledge of secrets, if you can discourse knowledgeably and carefully about faith in God, the mystery of Christ, and the unity of the Holy Spirit, offer to the Lord loaves of fine flour. But if you know only how to give the people common, plain admonitions and to treat the moral topic which concerns all, know that you have offered common bread.

Lev 24:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 3:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 22:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 18:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 19:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 13:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 18:17 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The loaves of presentation point to Christ, the bread from heaven, and to the eucharistic memorial; spiritually they distinguish deep teaching ('fine flour', as Abraham's loaves) from ordinary moral exhortation ('meal', as Lot's).

  • Lev 24:5–9; John 6:33; Rom 3:25; Luke 22:19 (1 Cor 11:24); Gen 18:6 (LXX ἐγκρυφίας, “loaves baked in ashes”, which Origen takes as “hidden”); Gen 19:3; Gen 13:2, 5–6; Gen 18:17. Words lost in the Migne scan, among them the Greek word ἐγκρυφίας (Gen 18:6 LXX), are supplied from Baehrens's edition. Leaked footnote references and stray note markers removed by logged corrections. The reserve about the church's mysteries is Origen's; translated exactly.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references leaked into the text; word rejoined; stray Migne note marker): Do- Luc. xvt, cxvrtt, I05. ν ο Jacob. tn, 18. Joan. xtv, 27. ‘ cxxvtt, 5. minum semper → Dominum semper; a-ternum (9.). → a-ternum.; disse. rere (ιι), → disse. rere,.

Topics: Eucharist, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.3 (PG 12:546b–548b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

13.4PG 12:548b–550a

Sed videamus jam quae sit confectio in istis panibus propositionis, quiante Dominum poni seutper jnbentur. De duabus, inquit ", decimis sit panis unus. Duas quidem decimas dixit, sed cujus mensurae sint ista: decimas non comprehendit; cum utique consequens fuisset, si de quantitate volebat agnosci, ipsam cujus duas decimas sumi jubebat, nominare mensuram. Quae ergo ista res εει, cujus mensura et modus nec comprehendi potuit nec numerari? Decem numerus ubique perfectus invenitur. Totius enim muneri ex ipsa ratio et origo consurgit. Contpetentcr igitur auctor et origo omnium Deus, sub hoc numero videtur ostendi. Sed si in Ecclesia de solo Patre loquar,et ipsius solius laudes proferam, unius decimae panem feci. Aut si de Christo solo fecero sertnouem,et ipsius enuntiavero passionem, ct resurrectionem praedicavero, unius decima: obtuli panem. Si vero dixero ” quia Pater cum Filio semper est, et ipse facit opera sua : vcl etiam si dixero quia Paterin Filio est, et Filius in Patre, et qui videt Filium, τιο dct ct Patrem, et quia Pater ct Filius unurn sunt : cx duabus decimis similae mundae obtuli unum panem : panem verum qui vitam dat huic mundo. lltcretici non faciunt de duabus decimis unum panem : negant enim creatorem Deum Patrem Christi υ neque Vetus et Novum Testamentum unum faciunt panem, nec unum Spiritum in utroque instrumentoprofitentur. Nos autem in lege et Evangeliis unum atque eumdem inesse sanctum Spiritum dicimus, et quoque modo ex duabus decimis unum panem prepositionis offerimus. Qui ergo separantChristum a creatore Deo Patre suo banetici, et Judaei qui soluat Patrem recipiunt, et Verbum et sapientiam ejus Christum non recipiunt, non faciunt ex duabus decimis unum panem. Nos autem mensurae quidem ipsius, id est substantiae nomen vel rationem comprehendere aut invenire non possumus : confitentes tamen Patrem, et Filium, unum facimus panem ex duabus decimis: non ut panis unus ex una decima fiat, et alius ex alia, ut sint ipsze dua: decimae separatae, sed sint dua: ista: decima? una massa, et unus panis. Quomodo dum decimaa'una massa fit? quia non separo Filium a Patre, nec Patrem a Filio : ε Qui enim vidit me, inquit ιθ, vidit et Patrem. Fittnt ergo panes singuli ex duabus decimis, et pr0p0nuntur ditabus positionibus, id est duobus ordinibus. Si enim una positio fieret, contrusus et permistus esset sermo de Patre ac Filio. Nunc autem unus quidem est panis, una enim voluntas est et una substantia : sed dua: sunt positiones, id est duae personarum proprietates. Illum enim Patrem, qui non sit Filius, et hunc Filium dicimus qui non sit Pater. Et hoc modo duas decimas in uno pane servamus. et duas positiones ante Dominum profitemur. Sed revera magni, ut ita dicam, cujusdam pistoris et docti artificis est, valde diligenter istas servare mensuras, et ita temperare de Patre et Filio sermonem, conjungere ubi oportet, et rursum tibi competit separare, ιιι neque duae mensura: aliquando desint, neque unquam nisi unus panis appareat. Duodecim ergo panes ex ista simila fieri ε niandantur secundum numerum tribttum quae tunc erant carnalis Israel. in quo mihi videtur forma trtius creatura: rationalis contineri. Duodecim namque putantur esse generales ordines rationalis creaturae, quorum figura erat in illis duodecim tribubus. in quibus erat unus quidam ordo regalis, qui Judas 257 nominatur. Alius erat ordo sacerdotalis , et Levi appellatur. Erat et alius ordo Iudae vicinus , qui Benjamin dicitur , in quo ordine et templum Dei, et altare collocatum est. Alius ordo Issachar , et Zabulon, et Ephrem, aliique quos nominatim designat Scriptura divina, quorum rationem non est tinnc temporis explicare. Est tamen uniuscujusque tribus, vel ordinis panis ante Dotuinum. Et licet sit aliqua tribus, qttze non ex libera, sed ex concubina ὦ Israel descendat, et ex parte libera , ex parte servilis sit , tamen pro omnibus ex duabus decimis panis proponitur ante Dominum, et in universis dum decimae similaginis constant. Proponi autem jnhentur supra mensam mundam. Quis autem nostrum est, qui ita habent mensam mundam, ut pauos super eam Domino offerantur? Si sederis (inquit Salomon '9) etBnare ad mensam potentis , intelligibiliter intellige qoze apponuntur tibi. Quae est ergo mensa potentis , nisi mens illius qui dicebat”: «Omnia possum in eo qui me confortat Christo, et ; ‹ Cum iufirmor, tunc potens sum? lu istius potentis mensa munda , hoc est in istius corde, in ipsius mente, Domino panis offertur. Ad hujus potentis Apostoli mensam si sedes coartatum ς, intelligibiliter intellige quae apponuntur tibi , hoc est spiritaliter adverte quze dicuntur ab eo , nt et tu facere possis quod additur. Ait enim ε Sciens quia talia te Oportet przeparare.

But let us now see what the making of these loaves of presentation is, which are commanded always to be set before the Lord. “Let each loaf,” it says, “be of two tenths.” He said two tenths, but did not state of what measure these are tenths; whereas it would certainly have been consistent, if he wished the quantity to be known, to name the measure itself of which he ordered two tenths to be taken. What, then, is this thing whose measure and amount could neither be comprehended nor counted? The number ten is everywhere found to be perfect. For the account and origin of all number arises from it. Fittingly, then, God, the author and origin of all things, seems to be shown under this number. But if in the church I speak of the Father alone and proclaim his praises alone, I have made a loaf of one tenth. Or if I make a discourse about Christ alone, and declare his passion and preach his resurrection, I have offered a loaf of one tenth. But if I say that the Father is always with the Son and he himself does his works; or if I say that the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father, and he who sees the Son sees the Father also, and that the Father and the Son are one, I have offered one loaf of two tenths of pure fine flour: the true bread that gives life to this world. The heretics do not make one loaf of two tenths; for they deny that God the creator is the Father of Christ, and they do not make the Old and New Testaments one loaf, nor do they confess one Spirit in both instruments. But we say that one and the same Holy Spirit is in the law and in the Gospels, and in this way also we offer one loaf of presentation of two tenths. Those heretics, then, who separate Christ from God the creator, his Father, and the Jews, who receive the Father alone and do not receive Christ, his Word and wisdom, do not make one loaf of two tenths. But we, though we cannot comprehend or find the name or account of the measure itself, that is, of the substance, yet, confessing the Father and the Son, make one loaf of two tenths; not so that one loaf is made of one tenth and another of the other, so that the two tenths are separated, but so that these two tenths are one mass and one loaf. How do two tenths become one mass? Because I do not separate the Son from the Father nor the Father from the Son: “For he who has seen me,” he says, “has seen the Father also.” The loaves, then, are made each of two tenths and are set in two rows, that is, two orders. For if there were one row, the discourse about the Father and the Son would be confused and mingled. But now there is indeed one loaf, for there is one will and one substance; but there are two rows, that is, two properties of the persons. For we call that one the Father who is not the Son, and this one the Son who is not the Father. And in this way we keep two tenths in one loaf, and confess two rows before the Lord. But truly it belongs to a great baker, so to speak, and a learned craftsman, to keep these measures very carefully and so to temper the discourse about the Father and the Son, joining where it is fitting and again separating where it is proper, that neither are the two measures ever lacking, nor does anything but one loaf ever appear. Twelve loaves, then, are commanded to be made from this fine flour, according to the number of the tribes of the carnal Israel of that time, in which, it seems to me, the form of the whole rational creation is contained. For there are thought to be twelve general orders of the rational creation, whose figure was in those twelve tribes. Among them there was one royal order, which is called Judah. Another was the priestly order, called Levi. There was also another order neighbouring Judah, called Benjamin, in whose territory the temple of God and the altar were placed. Another order is Issachar, and Zebulun, and Ephraim, and others whom the divine Scripture designates by name, whose meaning there is no time to explain now. Yet there is a loaf of each tribe, or order, before the Lord. And though there is a tribe that descends not from the free woman but from a concubine of Israel, and is partly free and partly slave, yet for all a loaf of two tenths is set before the Lord, and in all the two tenths of fine flour are present. And they are commanded to be set on a pure table. But which of us has so pure a table that loaves may be offered to the Lord upon it? “If you sit,” says Solomon, “to dine at the table of a powerful man, consider intelligently what is set before you.” What, then, is the table of the powerful man, if not the mind of him who said, “I can do all things in Christ who strengthens me,” and, “When I am weak, then I am powerful”? On the pure table of this powerful man, that is, in his heart, in his mind, a loaf is offered to the Lord. If you sit at the table of this powerful Apostle, consider intelligently what is set before you, that is, attend spiritually to what is said by him, so that you too may be able to do what is added; for it says: “knowing that you must prepare such things.”

Lev 24:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:6 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 5:19 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 10:38 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (allusion, high confidence) · John 6:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 30:3 (allusion, low confidence) · Prov 23:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 23:2 (quotation, medium confidence) · Phil 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 12:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Each loaf of 'two tenths' figures the confession of Father and Son as one substance yet two distinct persons, against heretics who separate them; the twelve loaves stand for the orders of rational creation.

  • Lev 24:5–6; John 5:17, 19; John 10:38; John 14:9; John 10:30; John 6:33; Prov 23:1–2 LXX; Phil 4:13; 2 Cor 12:10. The Trinitarian vocabulary (“one will and one substance”, “two properties of the persons”) is as it stands in Rufinus's Latin; translated exactly. The heretics who deny that the Creator is Christ's Father are presumably the Marcionites (not named). The tribes descended from Jacob's concubines: Gen 30:3–13. Stray Migne note markers removed by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray Migne note marker): modus (7'; nec → modus nec; Qui ergo t9; separant → Qui ergo separant; diligenterHO) istas → diligenter istas; mens (Η) illius → mens illius.

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.4 (PG 12:548b–550a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

13.5PG 12:550a–551b

Sed videamus quonme hi duodecim panes proponantur: Duae, inquit, ’positiones, iu una positione sex panes. » Putasne, otiosa est ista divisio? Quid est quod duodeeitnus numerus iterum partitur iu sex? liabet enim propinquitatem quamdam cum hoc mundo senarius numerus. In sex enim diebus factus est iste visibilis mundus. Duo igitur ordines habentur in hoc nmndo, id est duo populi, qui fidem Patris ac Filii in una-Ecclesia tanquam in una mensa munda custodiunt. Et superponitur, inquit ", super positionem thus mundum. Thuris species formam tenet orationum. Oportet ergo panibus fidei orationum vigilantiam puritatenupze conjungere. Pura autem oratio est , sicut Apostolus dicit ’δε Levantes puras manus sine ira et disceptatione. Simul et odoris suavitas impleri facit illud quod scriptum est ’δε Dirigatur oratio mea sicut incensum in conspectu tuo. Si quis ergo orationes quidem ofi‘erat Deo , non tamen habeat mundam conscientiam ab operibus malis: hic thus quidem videtur panibus superponere, sed non penitus nmndmn. Nam si omne thus mundum esset, non utique addidisset Scriptura, thus mundum super panes prepositionis ponendum ante Dominum. Nec enim putes quod omnipotens Deus hoc mandabat, et hoc lege sanciebat, ut thus ei ex Arabia deferretur. Sed hoc est thus qttod Deus ab hominibus sibi quaerit offerri, ex quo capit odorem suavitatis , orationes ex corde puro et conscientia bona , in quibus vere Deus suscipit fragrantiam suavitatis. t Et erunt, inquit ", panes in commemorationem propositi ante Domiumu. In die Sabhatorum proponetis ea. Si nondum tibi manifestum est quia panes isti verbum Dei est, ex his nunc sermonibus confirmare. Quid est enim quod nobis commemorationem Dei faciat? Quid est quod nos ad memoriam justitiae , et totius boni revocet, nisi verbum Dei? ideo ergo dicit , quia erunt in cornmemorationem prepositi ante Dominum. Addit et in die Sabhatorum, id est in requie animarum. Et qua- major fideli anitnze requies quam memoria Dei? quam in conspectu Dei versari? quam in fide Patris ac Filii permanere? quam orationes Domino tanquam odorem suavitatis olferre? Testamentum, inquit ", aeternum erit Aaron et [iliis ejus, et manducabunt ea in loco sancto. Aaron et filii ejus genus est electum , genus sacerdotale , quibus haec portio Sanctorum donatur a Deo, quod sumus omnes qui credimus in Christo. Locum autem sanctmn ego in terris non requiro potitum, sed in corde. Locus enim dicitur sanctus , rationalis anima, propter quod et Apostolus dicit : Nolite locum dare diabolo. iAnima ergomea locus ρει, si male ago, diaboli : si bene, Dei. Denique et spiritus malignus cum , inquit ", exierit ab homine , et circuierit loca arida , et requiem non invenerit, tunc dicit: Revertar ad locum meum unde exivi. Locus ergo sanctus anima est pura. In quo loco edere nohis mandatur cibum verbi Dei. Neque enim convenit ut sancta verba anima non sancta suscipiat; sed cum purificaverit se ab omni inquinamento carnis et morum , tunc locus sanctus cll‘ecta cibum capiat panis illius qui de caalo descendit. Nonne melius sic intelligitur locus sanctus, quam si putemus structuram lapidum insensibilium locum sanctum nominari? Unde simili modo etiam tibi lex ista proponitur, ut cum acceperis panem mysticum in loco mundo manduces eum: hoc est, ne in anima contaminata et peccatis polluta Dominiei corporis sacramenta percipias: ‹ Quicunque enim manducaverit. inquit , panem, et biberit calicem Domini indigne, reus erit corporis et sanguinis Domini. Probet autem se unusquisque, et tunc de pane manducet, et de calice bibat. t

But let us see how these twelve loaves are set out: “Two rows,” it says, “six loaves in one row.” Do you think this division is idle? Why is the number twelve divided again into sixes? The number six has a certain kinship with this world, for in six days this visible world was made. There are, then, two orders in this world, that is, two peoples, who keep the faith of the Father and the Son in one church, as on one pure table. “And there shall be put,” it says, “pure frankincense on the row.” The kind of frankincense holds the form of prayers. To the loaves of faith, then, we must join watchfulness and purity of prayers. Pure prayer is, as the Apostle says, “lifting up pure hands without anger or quarrelling.” At the same time the sweetness of fragrance fulfils what is written: “Let my prayer be directed as incense in your sight.” If anyone, then, offers prayers to God but does not have a conscience clean from evil works, he seems to put frankincense on the loaves, but not wholly pure. For if all frankincense were pure, Scripture would certainly not have added that pure frankincense is to be put on the loaves of presentation before the Lord. Nor should you think that almighty God commanded this and established it by law, that frankincense be brought to him from Arabia. But this is the frankincense which God seeks to be offered to him by men, from which he receives a fragrant odour: prayers from a pure heart and a good conscience, in which God truly receives a sweet fragrance. “And the loaves,” it says, “shall be set before the Lord for a memorial. On the sabbath day you shall set them out.” If it is not yet clear to you that these loaves are the word of God, be confirmed now by these words. For what is it that makes us remember God? What is it that recalls us to the memory of righteousness and of all good, if not the word of God? That is why it says that they will be set before the Lord for a memorial. And it adds “on the sabbath day,” that is, in the rest of souls. And what greater rest is there for a faithful soul than the memory of God? than to dwell in the sight of God? than to remain in the faith of the Father and the Son? than to offer prayers to the Lord as a fragrant odour? “It shall be an everlasting covenant,” it says, “for Aaron and his sons, and they shall eat them in a holy place.” Aaron and his sons are a chosen race, a priestly race, to whom this portion of the holy things is given by God, which we all are who believe in Christ. But I do not look for the holy place on earth so much as in the heart. For the rational soul is called a holy place; that is why the Apostle too says: “Do not give place to the devil.” My soul, then, is a place of the devil if I act badly, of God if well. Indeed, “when the evil spirit,” it says, “has gone out of a man and gone about dry places and not found rest, then it says: I will return to my place from which I came out.” The holy place, then, is a pure soul. In this place we are commanded to eat the food of the word of God. For it is not fitting that an unholy soul should receive holy words; but when it has purified itself from every defilement of flesh and conduct, then, having become a holy place, let it take the food of that bread which came down from heaven. Is not the holy place better understood so than if we think that a structure of senseless stones is called a holy place? Hence in a similar way this law is set before you too, that when you receive the mystical bread you eat it in a clean place: that is, that you do not receive the sacraments of the Lord's body in a soul defiled and polluted by sins. “For whoever eats the bread,” it says, “and drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let each one examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.”

Lev 24:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 24:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 141:2 (140:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:5 (echo, medium confidence) · 1 Pet 2:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 4:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:44 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 7:1 (allusion, high confidence) · John 6:41 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:28 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The pure frankincense on the loaves is pure prayer, the sabbath is the soul's rest in God, and the 'holy place' where the loaves are eaten is a pure soul, which alone may receive the Lord's body worthily.

  • Lev 24:6–9; Gen 1:31–2:2 (six days); 1 Tim 2:8; Ps 141:2 (Ps 140:2 LXX); 1 Tim 1:5; 1 Pet 2:9; Eph 4:27; Matt 12:43–44; 2 Cor 7:1; John 6:41; 1 Cor 11:27–28. “Two peoples” are presumably believers from Jews and from Gentiles (cf. Eph 2:14), not stated. Leaked footnote references and stray note markers removed by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references leaked into the text; stray Migne note marker): impleri (Ιὲ) facit → impleri facit; penitus (t3) nmndmn → penitus nmndmn; est (l4) quia → est quia; Patris li Cor. xu, 10. “Prov. ac Filii → Patris ac Filii.

Topics: Prayer, Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.5 (PG 12:550a–551b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

13.6PG 12:551b–552b

Sancta enim sanctorum sunt . Vides quomodo nou dixit sancta tantummodo, sed Sancta sanctorum: ut si diceret, cibus iste sanctus non est conunuuis onmium nec cujuscunque indigni , sed sanctorum est. Quanto magis hoc etde verbo Dei recte meritoque dicemus, hic sermo non est omnium , nec cujuscunque , sed sanctorum est. Non quilibet Verbi hujus potest audire mysterium, nam tantummodo qui purificati sunt mente, qui mundi sunt corde, qui simplices animo , qui vita irreprehensibiles , qui conscientia liberi, ipsorum est de huc audire sermonem , ipsis possunt explanari ista mysteria. Vobis enim datum est, inquit , nosse mysteria regni Dei; illis autem, id est qui non merentur , qui non sunt tales ut mereantur nec capaces esse possunt ad intelligentiam secretorum illis non potest dari- iste sacerdotalis panis, qui est secretus et mysticus sermo, sed in parabolis , qui communis est vulgi. Legitiuuun aeternale hoc erit . Legitimum namque et aeternum est omne quod mysticum est. Nam praesentia haec et passim visibilia, temporalia sunt , et finccito accipiunt: Praeterit enim habitus hujus muadi “. Quod si hujus mundi prreterit. sine dubio et littera": habitus prteterit, et manent illa quae aeterna sunt, quae sensus continet spiritalis. Si ergo intelleximus primo quomodo Deus loquebatur ad Moysen, et Moyses filiis Israel, secundo etiam rationem candelabri mundi, et lucernarum, atque olei ejus. tertio quoque panes propositionis ex duabus decimis singulos conlectos secundum voluntatem spiritus intelleximus, demus operam quomodo et nos huc tanto et tam sublimi intellectu non efficiamur indigni : sed ut anima nostra prius fiat loeus sanctns , et in loco sancto capiamus sancta mysteria per gratiam Spiritus sancti , ex quo sanctificatur omne quod sanctum est. lpsi gloria et imperiumin sarcula saeculorum. Amen.

“For they are the holy of holies.” You see how he did not say only “holy,” but “holy of holies”: as if he said, this food is holy; it is not common to all nor for any unworthy person, but belongs to the saints. How much more rightly and fittingly shall we say this also of the word of God: this word is not for all, nor for anyone at all, but belongs to the saints. Not just anyone can hear the mystery of this Word, but only those who are purified in mind, who are pure in heart, who are simple in soul, who are blameless in life, who are free in conscience: it is theirs to hear this discourse, to them these mysteries can be explained. “For to you,” he says, “it has been given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God; but to them”—that is, to those who do not deserve it, who are not such as to deserve it, and cannot be capable of understanding secrets—to them this priestly bread cannot be given, which is the secret and mystical word, but [are spoken to] in parables, which is the common word of the crowd. “This shall be an everlasting ordinance.” For everything mystical is lawful and everlasting. For these present and everywhere visible things are temporal and quickly come to an end: for the form of this world is passing away. And if that of this world passes away, without doubt the form of the letter also passes away, and those things remain which are eternal, which the spiritual sense contains. If, then, we have understood, first, how God spoke to Moses and Moses to the children of Israel; second, the meaning of the pure lampstand and its lamps and oil; and third, if we have understood according to the will of the Spirit the loaves of presentation, each made of two tenths, let us take pains that we too may not be made unworthy of so great and so sublime an understanding, but that our soul may first become a holy place, and that in the holy place we may receive the holy mysteries through the grace of the Holy Spirit, by whom everything that is holy is sanctified. To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Lev 24:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 8:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:18 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: As the loaves are 'holy of holies', so the deeper meaning of God's word is reserved for the pure in heart, while others receive it in parables.

  • Lev 24:9; Luke 8:10 (Mark 4:11); 1 Cor 7:31; 2 Cor 4:18. The scan is garbled and doubled around the quotation of Luke 8:10 (“qui non sunt tales ut mereanparabolis , mereantur”); it is corrected by logged correction, and Baehrens's edition shows that no words are lost there. Stray note marker removed by a logged correction.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (garbled, doubled OCR (Baehrens shows that no words are lost); stray Migne note marker): secundum (l8) voluntatem → secundum voluntatem; ut mereanparabolis , mereantur → ut mereantur.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 13.6 (PG 12:551b–552b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/13-1/#p-13-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-13-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.